The Indianapolis sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1880-1904, 1885-01-03

The trial calendars Of the Superior Court
are ready for attorneys.
Jbe jury in the Denny Bush roadcase went
out for elaboration at 10 O'CLOCK yesterday
morning.
Edward P. McCorkle has given $500 bonds
as the administrator of the estate OF Nancy
J. McCorkle, deceased.
Msria Rhodius has flied suit to foreclose a
mortgage against Mary Ann King and others
for s. eco. Demand, SO 600.
Judge Taylor disposed of 40 cases during
the past four months. He has about ten
cases under sdyisement. His record consists
of over 900 pages
The Christian Woman's Board Of Missions
of Marion County has filed suit against
Luke Roppner and wife and two others TO
toreclese = mortgage for 5000. Demand,
$500.
The divorce suit of Jennie /. B~oughmsn
VS.. jacob A. ~Boughman came no before
Judge Ayres yesterday, and a part of the
evidence was heard. The case will be finished
to day.
John Daniels, the Brightwood horse thief,
was filed against In the Criminal Court yes
terday, and upon arraignment he entered a
plea OF guilty. Judge Norton took the case
under advisement until to-day In order 20
make some inquiries into the life and ad-
venturers of the prisoner before tempering
his sentence.
+. /. and a. w. Ritzinger have filed suit
against William A. Niedhamer and others
10 forclose a mortgage given by Niedhamer
and wife to the Indiana Foundry Company
on lots 6 aud % in McCarty's West Side ad-
ditiOn TO the city to secure a note FOR $500
made a year ago. Demand is made for
s., 600 and for a receiver for the mortglged
premises.
William D. Jones wants a divorce from
MsIena Jones, whom he married at New
Ross, Montgomery County, in January. 1879.
While he does not charge Marena with
adultery. he says she kept the company of
men and women of loose morals. In July
lest she abando ed him. and her where
sbOuts are unknown. William is 4 farmer
and teaInster.
Colonel Gray yesterday called on the
Criminal Court and paid fines In the follow
ing cases against his lottery agents: Charles
Glszier, four cases; Josiah F. Mouiton. one
case; Louis G.. Bright, one case; Levi Wal
Ter, one case; Daniel Casey, one case, and
DAVID 4. Scott, one case. The ii1e in each
case was $40 and the costs Sil.5 80. The total
amount paid was S2l5 50, aud ACCOMPANY
ing this was an agreement to go and sin no
more.
Carrie I. Burton has begun the new year
with an application for divorce from Johu
c.. Burton, whom she married in October,
1876. Carrie alleges that for six years JOhn
has neglected 10 provide for her and her
children. The Goth OF last month he aban-
doned her and Nv pt % Texss. The complaint
says that inssmuch as John is not able nor
lit to have the care Of the children, and mas
much as Carrie is both able and at TO take
them and care for them she asks for a decree
10 conform TO the eternal fitness OF things as
above set forth. Carrie is owner Of the
grocery at C2I North Mississippi street. She
SAYS that as a judgment against John would
be but a burden on the court records and of
no earthly use, she does not want it.
The Baltimore and Ohio Telegraph Com
pany yesterday filed suit for restraining
order and injunction against the Central
Union Telephone Company. The complaint
alleges that IL is incorporated under the laws
of Maryland, the defendant under the laws
of this state and the Western Union Tele-
graph Company unde the laws of New
York. Since the plaintiff has put up its
lines and established its Office here il has CO.
tered into competition with the Western
Union, which company uses the telephone
instruments and wires of the defendant for
the purpose OF receiving the business 90 be
transacted over its wires. The plaintiff ap-
piled for an instrument for the same pur-
pose, and offered to pay in advance for its
use, but it was Te.Esed. IL is charged that
the defendant by this course is favor
ing the Western Union and i~njuring
the plaintiffs business, The complaint in
Inmates that there is no disposition 10 sue the
defendant for damages in each case where
it has failed to secure business because
it had not the use of the defendants wires
and instruments, for the reason that the
suits would be numerous. and would cause
endless litigation and pile up costs. For
this reason the Court is asked 10 compel de-
PENDANT to rent the use of is wires and in
stTuments to plaintiff, so that il may have
an equal chance with the Western Union,
its great competition.