The sun. [volume] (Morris, Stevens County, Minn.) 1882-1895, 1885-03-19
SPECIAL Iro1s1Ar1os prsxrpaovxp.


Several acts are disapproved on the ground
of special legislation, an follows:
Amending Sec 2 chap. 19, General Statutes
1878, relating TO division fences lapplying only
to Fillmore Chisago. Carver. Waseca and Ohm
An S act to alter and better define the bounda-
rics Of the independent school district OF Little
AM An act to change the name OF the Norwegian
Evangelical congregation, Minneapolis
An act 10 create . school district In the ooun-
An act relating to public schools Of School
District No. 4, Dakota county.
An act to establish . common school district
In withholding his approval from all bills
of The above SharacteS, the governor fol
lowed tie lShkuASs used i. the vetoes upon
similar bills eeSt the fouse or senate
when in session. He says This iegfsla,
Of art IA. u the constitution OF the state,
and is. therefore, disapproyed"
IN GENERAL So
The other acts disapproved, with the gov
elnor's comments thereon, are as follows:
An act TO amend sec. 4. chap. IA. General
For the reason that the act has no saving
clause. and its effect, therefore would BE- to
all s On with the
An sct relative to the insurance Of real
property, and the measure Of DAMAGES In case
Of loss thereof.
its friends. A valued policy bill had frst been
defeated Id th6 senate, whereupon this was in
PRODUCED ~ compromise, under the impression
the measure Of damages as to the value of the
property, and under this impression the bill
passed. The evidence Of this is cumulative, un-
Contradicted, and cannot be ignored Many
members who supported this bill express them
selves strongly opposed to It's eject. which. &C
sording to the attorney generals opinion. would
be the same precisely as that Of the bill which
the senate had first decisively defeated.
An act to amend sec. 81, chap. 10, General
Statutes 1873, and chap. 63. Special Laws 1888
not express the subject. and also makes an err
ronsous reference to the chapter Of the statute
An act to amend SEQ. 10, chap. 14s, General
Objection has been made to this act that its
purpose @ss to meet certain case and AFFECT
parties appeared and entered his protest, From
the showing made. tho claim seems to be well
founded
counties attached to others Tor judicial pur-
poses.
another and different one which Is not there ex-
pressed. 1t is therefore. repugnant to Sec q,
art. 4, of the constitution.
STATUTES 1875.
There is no saving clause to this act. and If
approved it would release every person charged
The title Is also defective
4 joint resolution respecting the Indian pol
icy Of the United States: approve, In the
main. OF the policy which seems to be herein ad-
vocated, and will cause . copy Of the resolution
to be transmitted Ito congress) as desired, but
dsapprove Of the publication Of SO crude and
carelessly formed an expression OF this high
character upon SO important = subject
Refunding $1S6.92 paid for certain state
lands in Clay county by H. J. and K N. Tatlis
This act attempts to appropriate money from
the permanent and general school funds Of the
state. It is clearly in violation Of section arti-
Gle 8, of the constitution. and therefore disap-
proved.
House File No 514, an act to amend Sec 1877.
chap. 8; General Statutes 1873, relating to the
duty Of registers of deeds Then Instruments are
deemed to be recorded. 1t has been made
known to me that the vote whereby the
senate passed this bill on the 4th OF March,
1885, was reconsidered by the senate the next
day, and the vote upon passing the bill was not
again taken. This. therefore, is not properly
before me.
Some three or four bills were disapproved
because already covered by an approved bill
of the other house.