The San Antonio light. (San Antonio, Tex.) 1883-1886, 1885-01-14


No 2Oss-I the District Court OF Bexar
County NARcIso LEAL 1T AT. vs.. RonEIT
JOHNSON.
The State OF Texas to tho sheriff or any Con
stable of Bexar County. Greeting;
You are hereby commanded that by max
Ing publication OF this citation In some
newspaper published In the county OF
Bexar once In each week, for four con-
secutlve weeks previous to the return
day hereof, you summon Robert johnson,
whose residence Ia unknown, to be and appear
at the next regular term OF tho Honorable DIS
trict court OF BcNar county, to be holden at
the court hodse thereof In the city OF San An
tonic, on the first Monday in March. A. d.,
1852 the same beng the second day OF March,
a. d., 1881, then and there TO answer n petition
filed In aaid court on the 2sih day OF Novom-
Der, A. d., 1884, In suit numbered e05s, on the
div,, uoekst Oh said court whIre'n Narciso
plaintiffs, and Robert johnson Is defendant.
The. plaintiffs in their petition allege that de-
PENDANT on May ~. 1888, executed and delivered
to them his promissory note for -Four Hundred
Dollars $40 00), payable eighteen months af-
ter Its date with lawful interest thereon after
maturity until paid.
That said motto was given for a part Of the
purchase money Of certain lots OF land stu
ated in San Antonio. Bexar county. Texas,
three t0, in block No. three CiI; said three lots
together fronting forty-four 40 varas on tho
west side OF Flores street, ana running back
49, In block No. !; lots Nos. .. II, 12 and Is, in
:, ., 10 %. II, i5 % . and a. in block II; lot %,
In block ", and lots T. q o. 8, o, TO- II and ~,
in block ~; all OF said lots being OF subdi-
vision made by Lecomte de watine. as shown
by Vol. No. II. page 3, of the records of Bexar
county, Texas. Al of the pr perty herein
described is situated In Ward No. of said oity.
southwest OF the San Pedro creek.
] hat said lots were on May cath, 1883 con-
veyed by plaintiffs TO defendant In con,idera-
ton OF The note herein described, and that In
said deed OF conveyance vendors lien was
reserved to secure the payment of said note;
that defendant, though often requested, has
never paid said note or any part thereof, but
has failed and refused and still fails and re-
that said note al remains due and unpal T.
and that plaintiffs are the lawful holders and
owners OF said note.
Wherefore plaintiffs pray for Judgment fol
tn eir debt, interest ard costs OF suit and FOL
tho foreclosure Of their lien on the above des-
crlbed premises and for general relief.
herein fail not, but have you before said
court on the said first day OF the next term
thereof, this writ with your return thereon
showing how you have executed the same.
Witness. George Il Dashicll, Clerk OF
- ! the District Court OF Bexar county
IsEAL given under my hand and seal OF said
- court ut Office In the city OF San An
A. d., 1884.
GEORGE Il. DAsnIKLL.
Clerk District Court Bexlr County.
by NJ. YTuRnI, in, Deputy.
lssu' d December % 1854
GEORGE Il. DAsHIFLL,
Clerk District Court licxar County.
by NJ. Y1uRRI. in, Deputy.
Game to han December %, A. ID 1884, at
O'Clock, y. IN and publication ordered the
same day In The SAY ANTONIO LIOnT.
Il. A. sTEvENs,
1871 Sheriff Bexar County.