Wheeling register. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1878-1935, 1885-09-09
JUDGE JACgS0N'S ORDER
In tbs Case of the C. & o. r. r. vs..
the State of West Virginia.
Full Te>, Of the Judges Conclusion in the
Interesting Ta> Injunction
Case.

fJd,e e.. j Jackson in the case OF the State
Oh West Virginia vs. the Chesapeake ald
ohio Railroad Company, in which tenn
,ors-v Injunction had been granted restrain
I'M, .ieriIfs from the collection OF tsxss due
me >.a.. by the company:
-. No., CON-. ~ Tho r-,i,s5 Sac,
90 Sow ,ba Disr-;c, ~ Wes, Vi- ,ipis
- @ba,~,s-s ., ,La c;,v of Wb.-'nO in
III +.s,-;., lrsvorGa- r G.a.p and
T.. -, -, p Z DDr, Arl;,o- or
u -, al - scn;,,.
T,..--r., -, ~ .ba o-,or.ira,.s for
- g. ,Jss;rr,.Ii ,s-a.r
- -. 49, A. I,- bsa-;n, A. cSar,,
90 ~ -. ..r ~, n. H., on his f-st day
~. .s...-,5,- -, 30 .,.,,.- o-,iar made
- ~ ,5a .,r.. 5,,y -. .II,Ir I.SJ And
.7,s'"' oH ~ - -. W,-,LaI
,',,,- - -, a val "a q
no. F:I--,-- ,I,.ssr' al
~. o. 'Ae an 20 ~ ~ 49,,
On o. re "''''4au - 49,
y' o'r ~ .p' - n ,,LS'i
b'EAh h'' H. 3. p" ,.A"-'i.' @'N .'s -.
i'"s' OonPAh! q We" to'Al ..'', .LI
l"e"'. Gays '..lr ~ I.'s uHL an. -, ,.'Y
com Pi"t-"T,S ' ne. S'..'.0' O. -
'@'-''' a. : 50 ~ H 10 Sef.'5Fnt
lance o. sl'e 80 y. - Cleo an
l. l'I"l ~. ~, Ill H., $500,
p-aE'hL Ol A'''s4 ~ a. L.;,,;o ,rbo
HyIe'", VI -, -, I-.,-s.,,,- -,
s,"''S INA, ne : u'-sC;s1 = ~ - sba.;F, =,
the >,A'e 10 apH,H, a''1 III Do, Eo
th' CoOh't-s u " a. ~ I, ,oN 49, a,5
na"Aa, IAle,'s' SUu''Ns;s' S' c'lJ.,.':,,
GceeEor'er, "eo are 1aMe5 as ue'5naAu.' ~"
the com H.ainAnt o''' anu i"7 e.
putY Auo!loV' As rc,I al -, n,.b:h;.s
MS answer 70 sAtu ~ - III onar;ca.
lA'Fe'n haILI,i " We - ga a. ~ .,
I'u "s 1u "'''.''', ~ O'-'!
.Ie yo -. oS d. , ~; Is n4iourned
the nearing Oh 'aI HpP..Iny.'. - Joo.5 a,
---r'-'uI i,n .'"l u US. .",' ,-'''''0 ~
cnS'u SsIs u 'I ~ 20 Jn ,,,.o,5ar 1885
A"u On u: t,u 20! - "a i1 - he nI,ca
Tue SS''I p"'''sI 80 .Io;n.;Gs eD,,v
H'o'es'''t a, ; 80, - liz amendment
-. - - III 49, o~5 ,Esrarnon the ami
~ :.s t ~ ;n;,,nn,ion y,as orgraJ D. ths
10 .i I0' - ~ co,rIainents who had
I 80. -T.S- o,,roo-sd and bg Hon. Vim J.
p,Sar;.oI' q h, nov also Appeared a. solici
I 80, nornssI ;nr the r5mnlaiuarts, aud
~ 10 A,to-ney General for the defendants
- named and said arguments not De,
3d.. ror-%'n,ai the fJ-,ber hearing Of sale
rro,ion was adjourned until the 9TH day o.
/ S,n.,m5er I-s5, OF this place, in chambers
Aud on the J.h day Of ap:ember l~~j, th'
said parties again appeared q. the place
aforesaid. and the complainants, in pu:3a
ance oftheir said notice, filed two amend
n-r,s 10 their sail ill, and the sad appll
cation bein. further argued hy the co1nse
aiortsai but sad arguments not beng con
Guided. the further hearing OF said app'Is'
ION was adjourned until tae Ith dag OF >-p
-eplbsr l~-5. al chamber IN the city 0
Wheeling aforesaid
And on the tn dAy Of September, 1850
the said Parties again appeared at the pIac,
aforesaid on which day the argument OF sac
application Was continued aud concluded
AID n app ,orrng from The said bill answer
,,I .vL.o;ts thar Tire right Of the State o
VI Vi-r MA. aud OF the counties, district
I'D u.-rir...I corrora.ious through whlct
t,r railway Of the defendant, the Che'a
,....,, ard Ohio Railway Company, rams
- 10 ,,vs. and l,gies IN question IA ,hi
"a, s..:l-d and determined By
..' CO 80 mill ,he month of April. l~-j
l'' 80. - asssssn,aa- Of the said taxes
"LG m 1.f, ,' - ,Ia ad5iion thereto o! ii,
anu 'e'. 80. IN, ,,sr,;on~d and complained o
ga p. -sL,, L;,r ,,,snot fully com
'H '"T C'''. So - - Inc 1855 es an
s-'e" IN '.'o - ,bs r.-.ifcstss Of ,h,
t'aI' %! r.;.f L;s ssid answer a
.'.l AuU,'' ~. fl 80 LID or5 ais,
rNn.'Ts nos. g. . = ~, O. 80, on,
2y me aL'gsnonS OF ,Ue sa't : @i'o s.;,
t.a' the said taxes ana 1e'l.s lI', o3 sry
'e" per cent, were not crEhHeu tu r., =,
.Tea to the ss'I onsrsus' VI Hu ~ NIL n,
NE Se'1 AT.". o' 'O' ,Tarac,-a n
month OF July - Sii. ~, -, s",r,'I 81 m,
ice op'a'on ina. a"osy ~ :.-c liza 0rsr,