Jamestown weekly alert. [volume] (Jamestown, Stutsman County, D.T. [N.D.]) 1882-1925, 1885-04-23
Case No. 275. Territory Of Dakota vs.


leave the city within "a hours.
No. 269. Same vs. Frank Tracy an,
W. Mckearney, refers to Frank Tracy
Tracy discharged same as above.
No. $50. Same W.. Jas. Conroy, sam,
as above.
No. 2S2. Same Va. VIM. L.. William.
same as above.
The court request in form of an order
that the county commissioners furnish
this man with suitable clothing, medicine
and care as he needs.
No. 26l. Same vs. Z. NJ Burr. Thi
Is the prisoner from Kitdcr county fol
forgery. Same motion and discharged
as above. This man had been IN prison
for several months.
! No. 427. Mary Mckay vs. Robert &
Mckay. This case occupied the cour
until no IN.
No. 49, Referred to II. A. Bill to TAX,
testimony.
No. 42O Heber A. Powell VS.. Lewis
Powell referred to A. G. Mcmillan to tcs.
timony
Adjourned TO 2 O'Clock p. IN.
| No. 462 James River Lumber Com
pany vs.. JAS. A. Atkinson, continued by
consent.
No. 4s3. w. +. Martin appellant, vs.
| Will Clark resp ondent, continued by con-
seat.
No. 4s9. Herman C. Wagner respond
ent, ". Geo. A. Case.
No, 400. Mike Helm respondent, VS..
Geo. a. Case appellant
No. 491. Richard Giese respondent,
vs. Geo. A. Case appellant. Appellant
novel to yet aside judgment Of lower
court with ~l0 cost IN each case. Mo-
tion sustained.
No. $751; y. A. Curtis respondent. vs..
e. e. Fish appellant. Appellant moved
continuance and were given S days to
procure witnesses.
No. l62. S. f. Campbell, ys. Alonzo
E. Gardner, continued and referred to II.
Rose, for an accounting and to take tes-
timony. -t
Jury in Mckay VS.. Mckay, rtturned
SPECIAL verdict. Jury finds defendant
did commit scts Of cruelty charged IN
complaint and finds defendant's property
worth 81 300
No. 1Gs. Leonard Verdegan vs.. Jack
son McAbey continued, 1t being one of
the 3rd district judicial cases.
No. 392. Rosellia NJ. i)ougherty VS..
Samuel II. Dongherty, same rs abovc.
No. 26O. .jno. Lock vs. 4. T. Dear.
born settled.
No. 2s5. Jno. A. Alden vs. J. pensum
Cox, and
No 1896. d. E. Haadell respondent, vs..
J. s. lays appellant, both dismissed by
consent.
No. Al and A. Diclsey county cases
dismissed on account of appeal not having
been perfected.
Petit jury excused nntil1 p. ~. Mon
day.
Grand jury came in aud presented three
indictments and reported nine cases in
which no bills were found, which at the
proper time the district attorney, will
move to dismiss.
No. SIS. The Importers & Traders
National Bank vs.. Geo. w. ssVennul:; ct
al, judgment for plaintiff or default 81
3l5 36-lOO.
No. .l6. Importers & Traders Nation
al Bank vs.. Archibald McKechnie ct al.
| judgment for plaintiff or default 81, ,l24.-
y.
70. 3l7. same vs.. Same, judgment for
10 or default S2,224.l2
paw. Nv :. y. Edward IL. Pitk,n ct al, VS..
49, 49, ~, I. johnson judgment for plain
,;n ~ defau,, al.o4l 81.
NJ ae7 Fra 'ak''n McVeogh VS. Fred
'ss ,o,n.o, Judgment for plaintiff
or default 1894 95. o
M AZ Lardy Il. Pratt ct al VS.
Patrick Ganrey judgmen : '"' p'a''''n o.
default &3l5.25. T., .,.,,o ~,
The court as occupied 70 eoamt err
TO, some time with cases fr Va ''a'"eS
county.
SATURDAY, ApEI Aos
The court convened at $50 a. m. pu'
suant to adjournment, Judge francis
presiding.
Attorney Rose moved the admiss'op
of Joseph C!eary to practice at the oar'
on proper examination as to quai'nca'
tions.
The court appo nted attorneys itose
Mcfiugh srd Davis, ss examining com
m,ttee for the term, and ordered that th'
examination he made in open court
The examination for this term to Re ora
only.
The morning was occupied in argumcn
on demurrer TO complaint 10 the case 0
sn,smau county VS. w. f Mansfield. 6
al.
Adjourned TO $3.50 p. IN. Monday next
MONDAY, April Goth.
The term al district court reconVche'
"A ner notice in the morning Alert at
! o clock p. IN,
The first business to occupy the atten
, ton Of the court was the admission
Edward W. Camp and Alfred Steele
the bar
Case No 70. Known as the count
0 treasurer Mansfield case. was argue
i on demurrer. The Judge stated upon 10
}. conclusion OF the argument of the atto'
news IN the case that he would decide II
!. question as 10 whether the demur'
n should he sustained or over ruled strict
according to law, and that the at'orne
). on either side might present briefs
:" early as possible.
l. The grand jury came in and report
SIX new indictments.