Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1885-06-02

the west side of Commercial street
within the corporate limits Of said city
and they, the said Meyers and Powers
did, on the 10Th day Of April, 1886, and
on other days between the 18th day OF
March, 1855, and said 10Th day of April
Ia said drinking saloon. unlaufully sell
and dispose Of intoxicating and malt
liquors without being licenscd % to dc
by said civ Of seattle, In violation ui
Ordinance No. 6S7 Of said city, and aisO
10 violation Of Section 800 OF the Code
0f Washington Territory. All OF which
be, the said James II. WoOlery. thea
and there, and az all times aforesaid,
well knew; and On the llth day OF April,
lesi5, IN said city of seattle, he, the
said James II. Woolery, being then in
Office a. Chief OF Pslics of said city,
was, by John Leary, the then duly
elected. qualified and acting Mayor. and
Chief Executive OF said city, lawfully
ooEnmanded and directed 70 ascertain
tbs facts In relatisn 10 any sales OF in
toEicatinQ liquor or malt liquor by said
Myers and Powers,and TO make sworn
complaint against said Meyers and
Powers for their unlawful acts afore-
said; and 10 ascertain the names OF ihe
eanid be- sustained; and 70 place such
swafn complaint, with the llst OF wit
nesses TO Support tue same. IN the hands
Of the City Attorney, 20 enable hin 20
prosecnts said Offenders; or to detail
one or more OF the Subordinate polace
officers of said city 10 perform said ser
vices. And tire said tawful COMMAND,
he, the said James IA. WooleEy, Chief
Of Police, then and there did wilfuliy
refuss aud fail to obey; aud be, the
said James II. Woolery, has ever since
wilfuliy refused and failed, and still
wilfully refuses and fails 70 execute
said lawful command, or any part
thereof.
AKIicrE I.-NEaLHcT OF DurY.
In this, that be, the said James II.
Woolery, while In Office AZ Chief Of Po-
lioe, ~ aforesaid. towik: on the 10Th
dag of April, 1885, IN the city Of Seattle,
was requested By q. III. Hauford, City
Attorney Of said city Of Seattle, TO make
sworn cnmpinint against certain per
cons, toeit.: William Meyers and 4. j.
Powera, for selling intoxicating LIQUORS
In tbs city Of Seattle withous being
| lissnsad 10 70 do by aaid city, 90 enabls
him, The said City Attorney, 10 rrose
cuts said offenders according 10 laW
and be, the said James h. Woolsry
uhisf Of Police, then and three did 70
fnse aad fail, and ever since fAs Tsfuset
and failed 90 make such sworn CON
plaint. although said Meyer cad Pow
ers were then, and prevtous 10 that tint
| and ever since were and have been, viii
| the knovledRe OF said James II. Wool
cry, eonlinuousiy engaged In the bust
mess Of selling iutoxiosting liquor II
said city Of Seattle without beins
licensed 40 TO do BY said city.
/ ARTtoGR ur.--SEoLncT OF DUrY.
In this, that said James H. wsolery
| Chisf Of Police as a'oreaaid, during 81
the time he has held said Office hae, II
violation OF section "a Of the city char
/ ter, neglected and failed to keep, ans
| be does now neglect and fail 20 KEGS
record OF the arrests made in said Uit,
| BY himself and the other police officer
OF said city; and hts monthly reports h
| the Common Council are made frou
| the records Of the Justices ct the Peac
instead Of being made from record 4
his own ofiioe.
AgrxcLR Ty.--NEoLncT oY DuTT.
| In this. that the ssid James H. Wool
cry, CHIEF Of Police as aforesaid, has 10
more than six months last past. In yio
lAtien Of session 4 OF division 2 of ordi
nan.,e a6t Of said city, willfuliy nealeci
ed and failed 70 inform against, wato
| for. search out, arrest or cause 10 be Al
| rested, persons whom be has REASONABLE
sause 10 believe offenders against th
provisions Of sections l, and ) Of d
vision : Of saia ordinances No. bsl Q
said city.
/ ARrpcLk v.--NRoI.xCr on Duty,
Ia shss that be, the said James 3
Woe,.ery, Ohief Of police ~ aforesaid
has neglected 10 arrest or eAnse 10 b
arrested and coBpiained OF, an unli
censad saloon keeper named Peter An
dsrson, iu south Seattle, also, an unl
casnsed saloon keeper nAEaed Peter bar
mar, At OF near Lske Union; Aiao. ~
unlicensed saloon keepers 10 the bas
mess part Of the City.
| Asrsu1k vI.-NEaLxrS or DUrr.
| In shis, that the said James H. wool
| ery, Ohief Of Pulice as aforesaid, Ia
| more than aix months bass past has, 4
| violation of section 4 Of Ordinance NJ
aNs. wtlifully neglected aud tailed 10 eu
force said Ordinances No. -. aad IN
psrusitsed large nnmber Of anlieense'
dsas % run ai large IN said CITY, an
made no effort 70 disirain and happens
the same.
Lxrlclx yu.-xsoEDcr eK DUH,
In this, that be, the said James y
| MsSl<ry, Chief Of Police - Aforesait
has nasiessea and failed, and stiii NJ
aaec.s and fails. 10 euforce The orders .
The Council directing him 70 carry %
| the orders and Instructions OF "a
| Health Ofscer Of the City Of Seattle !
cleeniEe klthy aiisys. ETC., usihtn 81
Csty.
1 akTIuLz vEEr.-xRoERcr on Durr,
In this, thai be, the said James /
Wosslery. Chisf % foiIce - aforesail
has nhaented himself from the Cft
without ieAve. unnecsesaztly, ana eot
tiAry 10 tss.
ARTICLE N -c0xDUcr srBvKRsrvE q
assap oapKn And fOa1cH nEsciFhEsz.
In ,hia. THAI be, the said James /
wo.hery, Cnief of Police ~ afefesAis
did iensre and disregard. and thersh
exis9 into cunsSmp1 The anshorisy
our Cs,s Chisf Eseesiive IN rsfasis
he ahsy his lawful order.
AnrirIx x.-ccxpccr srnvxExrsE or eoo
oEDxx Axp rorscn DEscrrEn,n
| Il, ahia thst be. The sAid J1rnee |
Noelery, Chisf of Rolioe - atoresas
did iznoss and aisre1axd. and therse
hriIla tnse es1tempa the e1tboltly ~
loxasEs ef the Csamitlse % he.lth sz
| Police. il releasing - fafntsA sBos
eouiplainsz 10 tks cifs AtturnsS - en'
/ lie him. he said CITY Aiiernef, 70 ~
Issnt uneet the difsc<ian u ths "a