, 1885-12-10
A Judicial ROUND UP.
a Field Day in the District Court
Yesterday.
A Wholesale Sentencing of Prls-
Oners.

The district coui convened yesterday
morning at 10 O'Clock, Chief Justice John
w. Lacey presiding
The journal record of the preceding day
was read and approved.
Yesterday proved what is sometimes
termed a field day, or a sort Of a general
judicial round up.
Early in the forenoon Judge Lacey an
nounced his determination to close h
term with the adjournment of court in
the evening, aud alter this conclusion was
reached there was a tremendous busting
around Of the attorneys, each Of whom
had several little kettles Of fish to fry.
The following is the report in detail Of
the entire court proceedings yesterday.
W. d. Chandler vs.. Elizabeth Chan.
der, a decree OF divorce awarded the
complainant.
Mathew LSheenan vs.. Howard Halver-
son; judgment in favor of the plaintiff
Tor the amount of his claim and costs.
Susan LOOMS vs.. Richard Whalen;
Judgment entered in favor of defendant
for costs, etc.
l. Usher VS.. A. Martin; case tried and
taken under Amusement by the court.
East for plaintiff, Potter for defendant.
Frank B. Tatersall vs.. Mary NJ. later
sail; defal alt of defendant taken, and the
case referred to master in chancery.
City of Cheyenne vs.. Warren Richard
son, Jr.; case dismissed on motion of the
city attorney.
Annie Clawson vs.. Frank Halstead; de-
fault of plaintiff taken and judgment to
be entered in favor OF defendant on sup
plying certain proofs,
Dynmene q Son vs.. n. b. Haynes; the
answer Of the garnishee in the case filed.
Territory of Wyoming vs. John Wal
lace; continued until the next term Of
court; the question of bail, etc, to be
settled at chambers.
Culver & Arnold VS.. Jeremiah Graham;
replication to defendant answer filed.
re- ~ ~ n
NAAe O'eu Vs. Jus Oie"' Il "ee'ee VI
divorce awarded.
In the case against |. s.. Bartlett, A. +
Regain and Edward Mallery, who were
WIN avsis.pI II oU'ei VI 'ne
oou'' tDepu'y 0neii" 'AuR"ul WINE az
tempting to execute the orders of the
court attaching certain property, the
'"iee ue''.u'S "ppeA'eu !" CUT anu
were peim'.eu " inc cou'' 70 uaAe ene'r
stS'eIne',s !" eAp'A""'''" u 'nc ",a"'
NE Dar'e'' maue 'ne statement ior n'm
SCH ""u "i'V ." pei''i VI inc o'uei '"o,
AmonK o.ner mugs W. pAr''e'' sA'u
ina, tue o'ner TWO ueienuan'S were acting
unuer Tue or1eis "nlen ~ JUSTICE Oh the
peace nc ia" give" mem u"u "e nopeu
cue eVu'' "ou'n "o' "0'' 'u'"i
Io'e ioi .nlnE 'u"' "Su "Nfpe"1u
Depu'F oner'" Augnn 'nsn mAue ms
s'a'einc"'' auu oi1iineu '"". ne went WIN
a VIII 10 attaou certain s'oeN not lar from
ror' AAia~,e' anu N 80 uonns was not
o"'y resisted Oy Tue 'nree out
was ooi'seu 10 uesiS' ior 'ne tune Oelns
'Iom executing tue VIII WI Dar'e',
eA'n'eu Una. 'n' property was oeiIs neiu
oy virtue Oh certain process 'Ssueu py nun
as d JUSTICE oI tue pe"e, Ahe cur
e'eu'uai. u,scnarReu 'ne u~eieuuan'S ne
gan anu WINERY Dar'le'I WIS Aiso u's'
e"arReu WI Tue pAS"'s"' Vi eo''S' "niou"'-
lug s'or ~,
,o'' NyoN"1" ""u ',D
CIiA were aulni.'eu as memoers u 'ne
psr Oh Tue nrs' luu'ei"i ui''r'''' anu o 0
'ne lelu'reu oa'n'
iue uceou"'S 0i Tue oiS'A VI 1ou
u".'eI o'a'es A't''nor N""poei a"u
O"i'eu ''a'es "",'"@i N1i' against '"'
government ioi ie's anu se''''es At ''v
present te,u u Vo"r'' were p'eSe"'eu A"'
app'o''u py ,ls court
"eo' a. Di"pe' " a. D's
lu1gueh, enIe'eu ior p'''n''n,
"eo, "A draper w. D"n'oi'n' luuH
"en' 'or piA'n',u.
1erri'ory o' wyoming vs. H. Altman
e. III Ncl'l. casel' the demurrer 10 pe''
ulon arHueu oy COUNSEL anu .aNen u"ue
ui'i'eni'nr ny rue eo"t~ 'i"'n ~ .n'
'err''ory' ahpe'a''cr " COUNCILMAN III
ueIenuAnu'
Inc lOloWllg named parties, VINO nat