The San Antonio light. (San Antonio, Tex.) 1883-1886, 1885-01-03


No al5s In the District Court OF BeSar
County NARcIso LEAL 1T AT vs.. RoBERT
JOHNSON.
The state Of Texas, to the sheriff or any Con
stable OF Boxer County, Greeting;
You arc hereby commanded that by max
ing publication of this citation In some
newspaper published In the county OF
Bexar once IN each week, for four con-
secutive weeks previous to the return
day hereof, you summon Robert johnson,
whose ftsidenCc Is unknown, to be and appear
at the next regular term Of the Honorable Dis
trict coui of BeNar county, TO be holden at
the court hodse thereof In the city of San An
tonic, ON the first Monday In March, A. d.,
lss1 the same beng the second day of March,
a, d., 1881, then aud there to answer a petition
filed In said court on the 2s'h day Of Novem-
Der, A. d., 1854, In n suit numbered 205s, on the
Giyl, docket Of said court, Wherein Narciso
Ieal and silyesire q. de I.eal. his wife, are
nlaintitfs, and Robert johnson is defendant.
The plaintiffs In their petition allege that de
PENDANT on May "a. 1888, executed and delivered
to thom his prom issory note for -Four Hundred
Dollars $40 0D), payable eighteen months af-
ter It's date with lawful interest thereon after
maturity until paid.
That said note was given for IA part of the
purchase money Of certain lots Of land stu
ated In San ANTONIO, llexar county. Texas
to-wii; Parts of lots Nos. one a.. two ~ and
Three o. In block No. three az; said three lots
together fronting forty-four 40 varas on the
west side Of Flores street, ana running back
~, in block No. !; lots Nos. y, II, IL and IL, In
block q lots y. 10, and Is, in block Z; lots, 8
., " ~ 10, IL, To- ~ - ana ~ In block ii; lot H.
10 block -, and lots I, 2, i, o, TO- II and ~
10 block 10; all OF said lots being OF subdi-
vision made by Lecomte de Watine, as shown
by Nol. No. IL, page ., of the records OF Bexar
county, Texas. AL of the property herein
described is situated In Ward No. of said CITY,
southwest Of the San Pedro creek.
I hat said lots were on May cath, 1888. con-
ton OF the note herein described, and that In
SAID deed OF conveyance a vendors lien was
reserved to secure the payment of said note;
that deft ndant, though often requested. has
never paid said note or any part thereof, but
has failed and refused and still falls and re-
fuses TO pay the same or any part thereof, and
that said note al remains due and unpaid,
and that plant IFS are the lawful holders and
owners of said note.
-, Wherefore plaintiffs pray for judgment for
th2ir debt, interest and costs OF suit and for
the foreclosure OF their lien ON the above des-
cribed premises and for general relief.
Herein fail not, but have you before said
court on the said first day OF the next term
thereof, this writ with your return thereon
showing how you have executed the same.
Witness, George r. Dasheli, Clerk OF
- the District Court of Bexar county,
SEAL given under my hand and seal OF said
- court at office In the city OF San An
A. d.. 1884.
GEORGE Il. DAsHIELL.
Clerk District Court Bexar County.
liy NJ. iTuRitI, JR., Deputy.
lssu December %, 1884.
GEORGE II. DAsHIEIL,
Clerk District Court Bexar County.
by NJ. N1uhRI, JR., Deputy.
Came to hand December %, A. ID 1884. nj &
O'Clock, p. m and publication ordered the
same day ia The san ANTONIO LIGHT.
II. A. STEVENS,
IL ~ sheriff Bexar County.