Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1885-10-20
SUPERIOR COURT.
Department one-yan Fleet, Judge.

MONDAY, October 10, 1885.
Estate of Daniel Mulberger, deceascdITrans-
ferred to Department Two owing to the disnuel-
lhcation OF Judge Van Fleet.
Estate of Henrietta Quincy deceased-Con-
tinued two weeks.
Estate of William Eschinger, deceased-Order
ing family allowance.
Estate of NJ. Esquiyal, deceased-Demurrer to
contest of +. II. Russell TO probate of will sus-
tanned. Probate of viii continued one week
Estate of Flora NJ Ogg, deceased-Order of
sale OF personal property granted.
Estate and guardianship of Edward Corbett-
i Petition allowing guardian to pay E. Corbett
Estate of Hiram Hubbard, deceased-Letters
granted to Mary Hubbard. Bond, $4,000. Ap-
pralsers, +. q. Warehouse, Thomas Snyder and
j. l.. HuntOon. Notice in RECoRD-UNIoN
Guardianship of Ralph F. Zeitler ct al mi
nors-Abby b. Zeitler granted letters of guard
lanShlp, on filing bond in the sum OF GOO in
each case.
for order compelling administrative to sell real
estate dismissed. Orders entered confirming
sale OF real estate and personal property
Estate of James Godfrey, deceased-Order en-
tered confirming sale of property
Estate Of J. /. Briggs Observation-Disclosures grant
ed TO Robert Cristie. Bond, 81 900. Appraisers,
7. BOIL, j. /. HuntOOn and J. n Young. Notice
In the matter of c. H. Shear, insolvent-No-
tice OF motion by assignee to set aside home
stead and personal property exempt from exc
cGtlon dismissed, Motion to discharge insolvent
from debts and liabilities continued one week.
In the matter OF J. Kaerth, iusOlvent-Con-
tinued one week.
In the matter Of A. Paquin, insolvent-De-
murrer to amended petition sustained. Ten
days to answer.
Miller vs.. Kripp-Cost bill retaxed.
Department Two-McFaTland, Judge.
MONDAY, October 10. 1855.
George s. Putney VS.. II. 5. Putney ct al. two
caSeS)-Contlnued one week by consent
aNnsara
Continued
John Watt vs. j. A. Parker-Demurrer over
ruled and ten days to answer Notice waived.
John +. CardWell VS.. r. F. Cavitt-Continucd
one week by consent.
f. S. George VS. Kate George-Demurrer ar
gued, submitted and taken under advisement
Howell Clark vs.. A. S. Olsen-Demurrer over
ruled ana seven days to answer. Notice waived.
Mary II. Schardin VS. n. Schardin-COntinued
one week.
Occidental Building and Loan Association vs..
Charles II. Shear ct al-Argued and submitted
c. A. Niemeister VS.. L. MISUNDERSTANDING
ued one week by consent.
People VS.. c. r. Clark, murder-Continued one
week.
A. Coolot VS.. Board of Supervisors of Sacra-
mento County-Decree entered in favor of plain
till canceling certain old delinquent taxes
Daniel Meyer VS.. James N Porter-It appear
ing doubtful whether evidence had been intro
duced as TO the monthly balance in the CITY
treasury, on motion Of S. c. benson, evidence is
introduced showing the balance in the city
treasury from January l, 1881, to February II,
1888. Ordered that cases Nos. 81, l ,3S9 $40
13l1, 1872 l,S9S. 500 ,766 ST. 1854 and 93l
being all applications for WritS of mandate
against the same respondent, as Treasurer ofthe
city, be and the same are consolidated each
party reserving all oh ections and exceptions
heretofore taken to any order or ruling of the
Court i'll any Of said cases. Cases submitted
findings filed, and decree filed and ordered en-
tered. stay OF execution granted City Treasurer
and City of Sacramento for thirty DAYS on mo-
ton of W. a. Anderson and W. F. George 1t is
by the Court considered and adudged: First
That all the coupons for interest on the bonds
issued by the city and county of Sacramento, for
city Indebtedness which are particularly men
toned and described i'll the findings, are legal
ana valid claims against the said city of Sacra-
M MO. ana are payable out OF the interest and
sinking fund whenever there shall be money in
said fund applicable to their payment in the
order OF their maturity and presentation for pay
ment SecOnd-That the petitioner Daniel
Meyer, in eases Nos. 1S71, ,39S and 100: F.
Roeding. in No. 1899; Albert Gallatin in No
1889; the Board of Commissioners of the Fund
ed Debt Sinking Fund of the CITY of Sacramento
IN No. 1,3i0; John d. Lord. in No. l 81: l. & s.
Wormser, in No. 1872; Frank Miller, in No. / ST.
and John Partridge, in No. 1,93l are not nor
are any OF them, entitled TO a writ of mandate
to the defendant commanding him, out of the
moneys now in the interest and sinking fund
to pay any of the coupons by them or any of
them. described in their petitions and in the
hhdings ana that SAID petitioners take nothing
by their said actions. Third-That the petit
TONERS G. X. Fitch, in suit No. ISL and the
intervenors Samuel Davis. the Board of Com
misSionerS of the Funded Debt Sinking Fund of
the City OF sacramento /. q s Wormser and E.
d. Kennedy, are, and each of them is entitled
to writ of mandate to be issued out of this
Court, directed to the defendant and command
ing him to pay them respectively out of the
moneys now in the interest and sinking fund of
the treasury of said city of Sacramento all of
the coupons held by them respectively which
matured on and prior to the 1st day of January
1874, upon the surrender by them of such coi-
pons for cancellation; and that, if the money in
said fund shall be more than sufficient to paw
all outstanding coupons of the bonds of said
city and county issued for city Indebtedness I'M
der said Act of April 2i, 1858, which mstured on
and prior to the LIST day of January, 1874 that he
proceed to pay the coupons of the next succeed
ing year, in the order of their presentation
Estate of Daniel Mulberger deceased-Will
admitted to probate and letters issued to Robert
G. Montgomery. Phil. Siebenthaler and r. S
Carey. without bonds Appraisers, Lee Stanley
Kent Blessing and Fred. Cox Notice in RECORD
UNION.
People VS.. Louis Hansche, on appeal from Po-
lice Court-Judgment of Police Court affirmed
Mrs K. G. Hoagland VS.. the State of Califor-
nia-Demurrer sustained. Ten days to file
amended complaint.
J. NJ. Hoagland VS.. the State of California
Same order.
James Henderson VS.. the State of California
Same order.
George Cooper VS.. the State of California
Same order.
Henry Leinberger VS.. the State of California
Same order.
James Reid VS.. the State of California-Same
order.