New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1885-10-01
WARD HAS THEM ON HIS LIST.
NAMES THAT APPEAR IN HIS SCHEDULES.
THE RECEIVERS ASSERT THAT THEY ARE NOT NEW
y

THE RECEIVERS ASSERT THAT THEY ARE NOT NEW
oNEs-LIvELY HEARING IN THE CASE.
Ferdinand Wards list of names continues to he
the centre of interest in the lotWarner litigation
and its notifications. Mr.. Ward. under the advice
of counsel still continues to withhold the names.
Julien 4. Davies the receiver of Grant IL Ward,
and Walter $. Johnston. the receiver Of the Marine
on the schedules made out by Mr.. ward Tor
Mcssrs. Davies and Johnston and others W no have
seen the paners corroDorate theSe statements. Inc
only perceptions regarding the names are those of
few men in private life, who, Mr.. Davies asserts,
merely bought the paper of Grant Il Ward and had
nothing TO do with the contract business. Mr..
Dawes said yesterday:
Unless Mr. Ward has on his list some names
which are known neither to me nor to others in
terested in the estate of Grant d Ward, lie has no
new names to announce. Y0u can say that authorl-
tatively."
The following is a list of those who, according
to the schedules in the hands of Mr.. Davies and
Others had dealings with the firm of Grant n
Ward and who either shared i'll the contract enter
prise or discounted the paper Of the 6rm; W. s.
McNamee. Charles McNamee, Jerome g. Chafee =:
NJ. Wilmerdnc. f.. L. HeITick (brother-in-law of
Charles F. Brtton, +. A. futile, j. G. Gardner, +.
D. Grant L. S. Grant r., Jesse Il. Grant, f. Spicer,
jr., j. Nelson Tappan, +. II. Toby, +: G. Toby,
James D Fish, b. W, Spencer; ". w Smith; James
u. Smith, G. K Garrison. J. NJ. Randal,W. A. Hall.
w. r. Grace, Mr., Bingham, of the Marine Bank
This list was shown Yesterday by u TRIBUNE re-
scLednIcs and has seen Mr. Wards list ana he said
"That list IS substantially correct. There may be
some minor differences, but none of any cOnsc-
0nence MIR Ward has no other names on his list,
unless there some unknown to me and those
have not appeared on the schedules. You have
everything substantially correct"
The list was shown to Mr.. Ward, who said d" |
have been misunderstood If have conveyed the i'm
preston that my list of names embraces those of
twentv-ninc different persons. what meant was
that | had made ont twentT-n;ne different
schedules or statements; some OF these show losses
and some gains, that two of them may be devoted
Mr. Ward took his pencil and, drew a line
through tue following 4anes ). II. WORK, julien
r. Davies James McNamec, Charles McNamee, j.
T. Chaffee Z. NJ Wllmerding, F., Z. James, f. l.
Herrck. f. 7. Wood, f. l.. short Charles p
Brltton, f. 4. Tattle aud }. q. Gardner, and sad
all dealt MS | understand it, through Mr.. Warner
and not directly with me; For that reason know
nothinE Of them beyond e ihhI ia Ssnc rougb the
names nf Jesse r. Grant and J. NJ. Randall and
added al did not deal directly with them. and SO
my statement includes no account with them, The
others are on my list"
The Others left were F.; D. Grant. !, S Grant, ir,
Spce r FG Nelson W. rssPen9 n W. o Smith, +
cousin of Z. ID. Grant, James r. Smith; C.. X.
Garrison. W. A. Hall, w. R. Grace and Mr.; bng,,
ham Mr. Ward again called attention to the fact
that he did not pretend that he had twenty-niIe
different names on his list. What the number was
or whether there were any others than those LETT
unpenciled he declined TO say, acting he said under
the advice of his counsel to make no further state
ment.
Thare was n lively scene in the attempted hearing
in the Holt Warner case yesterday. Charles Is.
Alexander had come all the way from Boston TO at
tend to the ir teresS of his client, w. :. Warner
Charles II. Butler in behalf of Assignee Holt, asked
Referee Cote to adjourn the hearing, as General
Hubbard was in Detroit Mr. Alexander gently re-
onstratcd declaring that this was no reason at all
for an adjournment, as General Tracy had been
representing Mr. Ward and Mr. Holt both and might
as well continue ir that capacity.
Straightway Mr. Butler said that General Tracy
ander's patient endurance and, in the vein of Re
ceiver Johnston who had accused Mr.. Warner of
keeping out of sight he said blandly: These
gentlemen are becoming very mysterious. wish
Mr.. Bntler would tell me where can get hold OF
them | shall have to subpoena them. | do not
believe the application is made on the sole ground
of absence but that the real reason is that the
plaintiffs have no evidence whatever against Mr..
Warner SO | don't wonder you don't want to go
on
This reused NJ Butler who insisted that he was
seeking evidence agarst Mr.. Warner, whcrcupon
Mr. Alexander considerably informed him THAI
9that fishing excursion Of theirs would not end
in ANYTHING except tho catching of stones" and
fiat they had no case and never would have. Mr..
Alexander objected to taking Adjourned DAYS in
October " As well set the case down. said he,
g for the next five Sundays" Mr. Butler thought
that little more evidence would enable tho
plaintiffs TO rest Mr. Alexander got in blow
from the shoulder regarding Wards sits TO the
Office of Mr. Warmers opponents and then the case