The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1885-03-28
OF PUBLICATION.
In the Circuit Court for Carroll County,
in Equity.

Fyetta Sauble and George Sauble, her hus
band; NoahPeterman and Julian Peterman,
his wife; John F. Peterman and Elizabeth
Peterman, complainants, against Samuel
Peterman and Susanna Peterman, his wife;
Barbary Miller and Cyrus Miller, her hus-
band; Sarah Lehey and Amos Lehey, her
husband; Samuel H. Peterman and Cath
crime Peterman, his wife; John b. Peter
man and Cecilia Peterman, his wife; Bar
barry j. Bechtel and William Bechtel, her
husband; Jacob P. Peterman and Savanna
Peterman, his wife; Caroline Mcmillan and
James Mcmillan, her husbands Susanna
Griner and John H. Griner, her husband;
William H. Peterman and Annie NJ Peter
man, his wife, Lewis l.. Peterman and
Harvey Albright, defendants.
The object of this suit is to procure a decree
for sale of certain real estate in Carroll
county, in the State of Maryland, of which
certain Ferdinand Peterman died seized and
possessed.
The Bill states that certain Ferdinand
Peterman departed this life interstate, in Car
roll county, Maryland, about the month of
December, 1884, seized and possessed of
parcel of land containing LOG acres and 80
square perches, more or less, situate, lying
and being in the county and State aforesaid,
a certain paper writing fled in this cause
marked Exhibit A.
That the said Ferdinand Peterman at the
time of his death left no children or descen-
dants, but the following brothers and sisters
and their descendants, to wit: Samuel Pc
terman, brother; Sarah Lehey, neice, wife
of Amos Lehey; Samuel H. Peterman, a
nephew; John B. Peterman, nephew; Har-
vey Albright, an infant, son of Matilda Al
bright, who was neice of said deceased, who
reside, in York county, Pennsylvania; Henry
Fl. Peterman, a nephew; Barbary Miller,
neice, wife of Cyrus Miller, who reside in
Adams county, Pennsylvania; Elizabeth Pc
terman, sister; Catherine Peterman, neice;
Barbary ]. Bechtel, neice, wife of William
H. Bechtel; Jacob P. Peterman, q nephew:
Noah Peterman, nephew; John f. Peter
man, a nephew; Fyetta Sauble, a sister, wife
of George Sauble, who reside in Carroll
county, Maryland; Caroline MCMILLAN, a neice,
wife of James McMullan Susanna Griner,
neice, wife of John HI. Griner; William H.
Peterman, a nephew; and Lewis L. Peterman,
nephew, who are non-residents and reside in
the State of Ohio.
That at the time of the death of said Ferdi-
nand Peterman he had four deceased brothers
whose undivided interests descends to the
aforesaid nephews and neices and their de-
scendants according to their respective rights.
That the aforesaid real estate descends to
and is vested in the aforesaid brothers and
sisters and heirs Flaw of said intestate as
tenants in common in fee simple.
That all the parties aforesaid are adults,
above the age of twenty one years, except
said Harvey Albright, who is an infant, under
twenty one years.
That said real estate cannot be divided
without loss or injury to the parties interested
therein, and it would be to the interest and
advantage of all the parties that said real es-
tate should be sold under decree of said
court, and the proceeds of the sale thereof
divided among the parties interested therein
according to their respective rights.
That the said Samuel Peterman, Sarah
I.ehey and Amos Lehey, her husband; Samuel
H. Peterman and John B. Peterman reside
in York county, in the State of Pennsylvania
Henry II. Peterman, Barbary Miller and Cy-
rus Miller, her husband, reside in Adams
county, in the State of Pennsylvania; Caroline
Mcmillan and James MCMILLAN, her hus-
band; Susanna Griner and John 81. Griner,
her husband; William II. Peterman and Lewis
L. Peterman reside in the State of Ohio, be-
yond the limits of the State of Maryland.
1t is thereupon adjudged and ordered that
the compliments, by causing copy of this
order to be inserted in some newspaper pub
lished in Carroll county, Maryland, once in
each of four successive weeks before the 9th
day of April next, give notice to the said alb
sent defendants of the object and substance
of this bill, and warn them and each of them
to appear in this Court, in person or by solic
itof, on or before the 9Th day of July next, to
answer the premises and show cause, if any
they have, why decree ought not to pass as
prayed.
GEO. A. MILLER, Clerk.
True copy,-Test:
mario Gro. A. MILLER, Clerk.