Daily Republican., 1885-05-20
T IF 7 H EDITH


uHo.lor court Resumed
a. ~ o'clock this inornin, pf'ccs
; Nh with the trial Of Xxx, and
w. Crumbanah W.. WIN Nv use Il
" iillam I. Hopes was c. -. J"c
MI p, and testified thai t4. ut
mr., Robinson incved out at, ~
gay previous to March *, y" ,le
run Is hi, pangh moved in the na NO. >.
W hlm' and the witness h.in a', W
,n "a stove. He also notirs5 'gG 70
ierent deadlatch had been '' mat
OF the hall doors Hs pun q
latch was the same that VA. ,Ao ,,u
on Dr. Crumbaugh's of1ica i tteVl
Lore cross'exainined him 1oof;
before he was permitted 70 el
stand. '0u 70 leaV
George Wilson was sworn
i,su ina, ,haI no saw DR.. Crunban aJu
in shortly after ilr. Iohi"sousn
away. 'o'hsJn d
Mr. Nields presented ami i
letters from Mr.. jackson 10 ~ ,ela
nauGh, ono of which was 1a ~
Ii, lSs3,in which ! o warns t G"'10
W erect a los-pen on the prer,.e0
me other letter IN dated Nav =.
same year, and calls The DE-,
non to the fact that he was H.
the premises without hav,nn."'''l
leases, and that had he kn . ,'sAe
DOCTORS way of doing Ln,ia
would never have pernit,o1 'u ~
occupy any part OF the prerois.. III
| lie also claimed in IN. let.e, y.
CrumbanGh had obtained pr , ~
the part occupied by Mr.. hin,
forcibie entry, and tArole, "'I
with him. He STATED thai pv .I
would sign such leases as h, J'a
would have prepared, he VOW
him accountable for double 10,
OF rent paid by Robinson. and s's
Did him to cut the.rrass on tsaIa
An argument then eusuei h.,
counsel, which continued t,tstms
on the legality of toe dis,ralnt INV
as 1t Was made at night on The S5
the month. Mr.. lore con,eu led
no distraint could be made ryrenl
rent due and in arrears, ana ,bs,J
rent was not in arrears un,i at,aI
day 1t was due. He also c,ai,nrd
distraint TO be- legal must DE- ma1a
ing the daytime, and tina, a, ina
traint was made after nigh il wac
gal and void.
This was disputed by III. N
who commended that rent unDaiI he
in arrears the day 1t was due and
several authorities In supo,r Al
position. He also Claimed M
distraint could to laid Il, ary
when an officer could get il. The bd
The court decided thar the dls,!essI
ILLEGAL, but differed as 10 the time }
il should lie paid.
Mr.. Nields then said ilattheir Il
was for 1928, and il tle plaintiff
willing TO pay that amount they \
willing to allow judgment to be en-
against them anu pay the costs.
Lore said he was satisfied with lid
rangement, as they had always
willing to pay the amountGue and
on several occasions rendered /, I'd
II. jackson, who had refused % a
1t, AZ he claimed Goubie Tie ami
Tho jury then, under the ius;ruc,i(
tho Court, rendered verdict in (
of the plaintiff Tor & cou!a damagas|
costs.
] lie next case taken mp was lid
fthe Minneapolis Harvester w0;ks
Alfred P. Crocker, with Wiiilsl
Lyman, Esq, for,the plaintiff and
Biggs, Esq., Tor the defendant II
"a suit brought TO recoTerS!!j
Interest .ere u August lst, ISIS, tor a
sold and delivered.
Abner II. Woodward Wa sFt'r,
testified that in 1883 lie wa: engage
the agricultural implemeL; tuslna
this city, under the firm name Of A
Woodward * Co. HIS tTm was
lReneIal agency for this STATE tur
Minneapolis Harvester WORKS,
power to appoint other agents, u
This power they appointed Thomas
Lockwood their agent at Miidc;c,
and he sold a machine 10 AIi'ed|
CIocker. The machine wa; the 4
perry of the MlnneapO..s Ha'vs1
Works.
Thomas A. Lockwood testified lha'
solu The binder To Alfred r tr0Cser
the latter part OF june, -, VIII
understanding that il II was not q
factory he would return Ia oucs' ,
price was S225, and 1t was IL Lave
paid for by note but no note was
given. He had tried to sell hun
binder before harvest, but lie dla
buy it until b . old one broke do"D'
Mr.. Biggs cross. examired the wiz
at length, with view Ct los w
the machine was not in perfect olu'
the time he sod it 10 Mr.. Crockett
would not do the work. Before
cross. examination was mpeled,O
took 9 recess until 3 O'clock ms q
noon.