The Red Cloud chief., 1885-11-27
~sEHORiCkS AND lGg.
Each Taiis iats tho othsr. tTa. oses
the Rs.ait ts NtFs aia

the h"sAit 10 NFE aHa
Bourbon mrt Hcurhon shen FEzhnEh
Lee and Hendricks exchanged en-
g~ratulatious over The >;Atssgpgrm2ey
victory m Virginia Ftts i~r in hh.
telegram Ia H,ain-ks Puusly prayed
thai ''thc spirit e ,hc Sage Il Monti-
cello might watch oyer the drstni., q
Virginia forever, and uo ioub; thts
sentiment va, highly acceptable "a tho
Indiana mus.back. Lee AMI Hendricks
ar united Ia their blsuiesi attachment
% Jh- -u-cailci principles ot Jcdcr-
spu.au Democracy a. ia;d down ~ Tho
>tat.-syru-fsuty and src-un re~oiu-
tons 81 l.a> which Jefferson declared
tho .tvatr,t WORK of hi. itv Ia.
flower 81 ~Jca,r-anlau democracy Is tho
>,at,~,ssrciEufs doctrine. anj 4, -
th. supposed revival Il thi, theory IN
Virgins which prompt, Hendricks aud
L,r - indulge ia f,ile.ittHus
- FAR Mr. Cleveland bts not seen ft
60 iDfWari anv congratulations - the
Virginia Buur.s,us irrhap. u" rral-
ifes tklt 10 would he uusrvtuly 10 him
- congratulate "a. Virginia Huurlsons
ON their dc' ou' and rrEtiii.aa attitude
toward the National Governments. and
,hs; such displays q hirptTs Bui bad
tastc should J., Ia Ia the icc-i'rs- 81
dent. IN, platform CA Wairh the Nr
gtnia D,mp,r,t- have won their victory
Il. q virtual dryirrsiou q re lian
against the a%gtaurt, of the ln4~i
Sti'.- Supreme Court and a ishAncr
81 ;hc National Government L. put
ting 1t forth the Virginia ilpUstons
-aii Tho question j. whether TIA.
state If virginia .hsil t,r atrslsLrd be-
fore the Federal Courts. controlled Nv
Republican Judgvs. s.ijud eating upon
thu sovereign right. IF ihr state. and
n the Supreme Court hal dared "a de-
eide the bond eases contrary to the dc
sire % The bourbon, they appeal e. thr
/ people "f Virginia ." ''units IN defend
ing the imprriI.d r.chts q The tDin-
monwcalth Ia almost any other
country such language a. ,his would be
ranked a. reasonable and e.ditious
The Nicc-l'rc~idrnt hasi"ns u con
graiulaie the Virginia E"ufbpns on
their programme II resistance 10 the
United States supreme Court. He 81
course agrees that the "spyrTeign
STATE can not be aTra;gEcd ia the
! Federal courts. and that the Sirgtnians
must defend the imI"uled rights 81
tbc >iatr But a. the ~upreiae ,ouri
has arraignei Virginia at t. hfr s.s.
passed Judgment On the ioai eases 10
would be interesting 20 know ~hst
Hendricks and fltzhugh Lee propose
20 10 in the way - forcing the C"ur Ia
reverse 10. decision. The Eouri-ons
base carried Virginia hv election cheats
and swindle.. bat the decision OF th.
supreme Cont In the bond csse. z;iIl
stands. Ordinarily when ".osrTeign
rights are invaded the "uly r~sfs~ty 10
io take up arms. bat as the NiTxiaiAn
Bourhons make 80 hint of var u = not
| clear bow they intend 10 protect The
Stat from The decisions - the supreme
Court. I; J. perfectly clear. however.
that the Vce-Prcs.den; of the Uai,e.i
States in oongtA;uiating and isiici,st-
Ing a Bourbon organization ~hich has
taken 4 rebellion. and hstan; stand
toward the highc.; court "a The country
| violates sl the pEoprietisz Of bis posi-
tion and de-rsde- an Office which hs 70
unfit ~ hold A an individual Hen.
drIcks might cherish sts;e-soysreignty
bigo.ry 90 hia hearts content. but ne
has no right 10 scanialiEe the yHs-
PRESIDENCY by encouraging resistance
10 the authority 81 the Supreme Court
-rf,<1gO Tytbuns.