Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1885-10-28
WHOLE NO. 1O,77l.

stand that we can cross-examine the wit
ness at this time2
General Carey-Certainly.
Mr.. Jones-Mr. Gale, what relation are
you to d. NJ. Burns?
MuneSs-I am his brother-in-law
MIR. Jones-Where is he now? Do you
know?
General Carey-We object on the grounds
that 1t Is immaterial and irrelevant.
Inc Court don't know what the ques-
uon leads to. The objection is overruled
" itness-l believe him to be in Mexico.
MT Jones-4 on state that Mr. Reynolds
acted as Deputy Secretary of State Now,
now much was Reynolds in the office? Is
1t not fact that he was away greater
part of the time?
Wltness--Sometimes he would be gone
three OF four days out of week Then
again sometimes he would not be cone
more than one day in a week.
Mr.. Jones-Is it not a fact that he was
away from the Office most of the time: in
TACT so much 50 that the employees talked
about it?
Wimess-He was away a great deal of
the time. Think he was absent more than
present During the year 1882 he was back
and forth great deal
MI Jones-Now sir, do you know or
can you tell where Thomas II. Reynolds
was on the 18th day OF February, 1892
NltnesS-Nc sir, cannot say. The his
tory OF a transaction commenced in the
blOtter Mr.. Danf0lth made those entries
IN the absence Of Nr. Reynolds Occasion
ally others made them. DanioTth had
charge OF the trademark department It
was cuStom2rY 10 hand Reynolds the
money and tel him whqt It was lor.
Because the entry in the Zee book of the
tTanSSacn9n OF February 2Sth appeared in
the Handwriting of Thomas Reynolds, wit
ness Admitted that it did not prove that he
was IN the Office on that date. for the fee
pook may nave been written up days, even
weeks afterwards. When Reynolds was
away ar. Danlor,h acted for him
witness continuing s2id-I recognize
the cash book only 50 fer as my own writ
ing IS concerned. saw Reynolds writing
IA " Sii'il't o'ls'
I'll" SECOND WITNESS.
4. /. Dewey was next called to the wit
ness stand. lie said he was a resident Of
san FRANCISCO; was engaged in q patent
agency and the publication Of newspaper
lie was in the same business at the same
pace IN February, 1882.
He recognized a letter that was handed
INN by the prosecuting attorney as being
written ON one of his letter heads. and also
IN the Handwriting of his clerk The letter
was addressed to Secretary of State incIos-
ing check Oh the Pacific Bank for S24
and requesting four certified copies of
trademarks.
Cross -eXamlnation-l am tolerabiy fami-
Iiar with my clerks handwriting. Have
no particular recollection "t this particular
tIa!isaC!!oh' Don know whether | was
IN III the Glty or nor. presume 1t all came
lhroush INC Hsual channels III the daily
routine OF business. ! cannot say that
knew such letter had been written or q
checR ior that amount drawn until after
WARDS.
he-olrect eNanlnauon-l was asked for
the check and hunted 1t up, and came
win II before the Grand jury.
Feheral Carey told the witness not to 20
away rs ne would desire 10 ask him few
more questions later on III the case.
J. j. O'CoTNoR TEsTTFrEs.
lie soid be had boa,, . ,Io.l. :, .t...a,-.
of tho State CnnfrnIIcr s;co fo,,-,o slr Iot
He was aconaintcd ,,itb 10 g''t,,,1, 1000
ITe noirtaJ n,,+ tIa oorI - rI
which he saif ,,o ,.ii ,,oS ieG IooAs
,he PiI,1s oJ,,,;ni,t,.o+;, Oi''' ''e" IiS
General Carev1As cIcri, IN Tho Co,+ro1
Io,,s e. II ;.-.!.: ~ 'I4e Coii'lol-
Iai9,r "ftat az ~ e9.i uiu you
retarv Of Stote9 VI '-'' oi''00 Vi '1e ''ec-
Indga nonSo,, W. o<,I.ioo..,, -, .1........,
OF its iI,,,notnrio1it,- III G-i @ 'Ie io,lllS
Obiactinn snstoinn5 anu iieo'H potency
rrS,g,i Ito,,,.aI Soro~Wou ,,,r,.,i-eS; il,o,,
ros,,It 81 tI, .it'''' Iial vas the
IeST1t ~, .! u tile lhNeSt'Sa,IGH
! nc Coult-,3ehfTat carey that IS OF the
Sil,e ':lu callS IoT me san, answer as
tHc question lIlst oVerruied. Will allow you
~ '''f '5iS WINES I'iatVe 10 me charge IN
!uls llIdlc'lneIt, put snail sustain the OBJ
JeGlloH 70 al! other questions relating to
~ =, .-.'.I q l"IisaclloI4s; Ji
Hel'eIai Carey-" Ell, then, answer as to
u'19 ", !..' .ll-- t--"l2: "a transaction;
r,..'...s l.iit,sS-" = - onhd me letter from
i,I % - sla'ls tIal IouI traGe-InarAs
tiau oeglt SGll'' anu also mat 81 had been
loL #aI,iel III payment OF me Iees. By IN
Ae?tiE4'IiIs we loulu that ~ had been