The Milan exchange. (Milan, Gibson County, Tenn.) 1874-1978, 1885-10-03
TESTING ANIMALS.
Reasons Why More InteIligents Test Can
BE Made on the Farm.

Reasons Why More lntelligenS TEST Cah
BE Made on the Farm.
Public tests of celebrated dairy COWS
may be of little value to the average
farmer, as he does not practice the modes
of feeding d6ring such tests, nor give
the same care and management to his
stock. But the tests are valuable, as in
dicating what an animal can be forced
to do if the conditions essential to sue
cess are complied with. Now, the
farmers business is to discover what
the conditions for the success OF his
stock are. He may have the examples
of others as guides, which will materi-
ally assist him, but there are conditions,
however, peculiar to his own circum-
stances, to which he must conform, and
in which no one can assist him. His
soil, climate, buildings. water, shade,
quality of pasture, method of feeding
and kinds of food used are all important
factors to be considered. So far as the
denial of the utility of the public tests
is concerned, the fSct remains that they
serve as beacon lights in the direction OF
which all must steer. 1t signifies moth
ing that the product of the COW may APP
parently exceed the nutritive value OF
the food consumed, for the figures are
stern, and point uuerringly to the real
ization of the object sought, and though
tie high-pressure public tests may be
of kind not approved by the farmer,
yet they open up to him wide field for
reflection, and teach him that while he
may not hope to equal such, yet he
must also test his stock, if he is to sue
coed, without regard to capacity.
Every animal on the farm should be
tested-whether cattle, sheep, swine or
horses. The ordinary cow should have
her merits known to the dairyman, and
he should familiarize himself with her
qualifications, not only as a mixer, but
as to the kind and quantity of food best
adapted for her purposes, and the
most profitable. A COW may give only
twenty pounds of milk a day, and yet
be AN excellent animal if she can produce
that amount at a low cost, while another
cow in the same herd may yield thirty
pounds per day, and yet prove unproiit-
able compared with the other. The eve
should give twin lambs, but it is more
important that she give them sufficient
nourishment, aswell as yielding for her
self fair average of wool. The mare
may be serviceable for all kinds of work,
and yet be unproductive as breeder,
while the SOW, though bring forth large
filters of pigs, may be unsuccessful with
them as q nurse. Nor are the males 10
be excepted The quality of their get
is important, while they must also give
profit for themselves as individuals.
In order to know each animal il must,
therefore, be tested, and not only tested
during certain seasons, but at periods
ranging over the whole year in order to
thoroughly understand the conditions.
Then the feed itself is to be tested, as il
differs in quality at certain times. A
crop of hay one year may be different
substance from that of another time, and
hence the results obtained during GER
tain periods will not always enlighter
the farmer as to his proper course al
another time. But such tests will ma
terially assist him TO avoid mistakes
previously committed, and teach him
where to economic and when to be lib
eral and generous with his stock.
Public tests demonstrate that there II
no limit to the capacity of an animal a
long as the conditions are not compiled
with. She may be able to do more with
out having been given an opportunity o
so doing, and thus it is on the farm
The farmer should not condemn his ami
mails until he has faithfully endeavoreC
to give them the full privilege of demon
strating their capacity, and when he ha
performed his part he will then know
that his profits will be according to tn
quality of the stock, as he can retail
any such as have proved themselve
worthy of his confidence, while the in
ferior class will be discarded, the resul
being that the stock will be gradual
improved and the profits increased
Philadelphia Record.