New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1885-11-28
THE TORY REACTION.
p,n,cus RESPONSIBLE FOR DEFEAT
,vonr,s,xc GAINS FOR THE GovERNMrNT-LoNDo"

..,o,r,sIvG q \INs FOR THE GoNFi'NMHNi
o,,,us SWEPT BY THE ToMEs--Ihh
cor,xTIrs STILL TO BE JlEARD fRoM'
fpY CABLE TO THE TRiBUNE'l
ox Nov. o. The latest election returns
.ho,v no check to the course OF the CohSclN "'''o
,coction. which aow promises to exceod 'n"' Vi
1874. Unexpected gains and losses occur VI
hotb sides. but tho Conservatives MAINTAIN s''"'
n,enonderance They carried yesterday - So"''
30 oc tor the Liberals. The same boroughs seh' u
,hs last Parliament 10 Liberals and 10 CohS'r'"-
tives The net Conservative gain III three. u'S'
is 43.
The result Is nowhere more remarkable tina" III
.ho ,oetronolitan constituencies. Tho Liberals III
,ba last Parliament held Ii seats and the tories =
The number of seats IS now trc1led Inc L'''i'''S
courted unon winning threefourths of them. Inc
Tories have already won 30 and tho L'"oi'i' i''
Onc-thirl still remain.
Manchester. with five Tories to one Liberal, JOINS
Iivernool Leeds and nearly every great English
town cxceot Birmingham in the protest against tie
Liberal Surrender to Radicalsm
The evidence pours in that tic Liberal party IS
indebted to tho Radical wing for its defeat I.c
LIST Of conspicuous Radicals beaten at the polls
includos Mr. Childors Formerly Chancellor of the
Exchequery, Mr.. Shaw-LefeSre (formey Postmaster
Gcnerap. both of whom were inprudent on IRISH
ouestions, T.. C. Thompson, whom Mr., Parnei 5
patronage failed tc elect at Durham, ana MI OShea
who was vainly recoWmcnlcl to Liverpool by
botb Mr.. Parncll and Nh Gladstone. Liverpool also
dismisses Sociahstc Samuel Saith; Fulhain rejects
George ". Russell, Mr.. SteaNs friend; Manchester
tarns ont Jacob Bright and Nr. Siags; West
mInsler prefers w. Durdett-COutts to Professor
Tersly; Hackney declares itself tlrcl OF IT'S old
favoritc. Mr.. Holms; Mr.. FIRTH lately Sir Charles
d lle's colleague, loses North Kcnsington; jesse
Ceilings has only 60 majority III Ipswich; p. Id
wards mt Rochester Arthur Arrold at SaIiord' e
Hops ood at Stockport, Or. Pankhnrst at South
yark aud L. Collier at Chatham, have all gone
unler Mr. Chamberlain loses great number 0l
his stanchcst partSans.
The Liberal papers profess to rely on the
COMMITTEES 10 reverse the verdict of the borugh' The
Dqily Ndos boldly declares that Liberal majority
is still probable but judiciouSly abstainS from
figures The facts that tie Liberals eApected
a majority of 60 in the English JoroughS which
tins fax return Conservative l11iortv Of II. Tho
most authoritative Liberal estimate before Tie cec-
tions began claimed hut 115 Liberal Enslis county
members to 119 Conservatives. Ireland With -
Parneites and Scotland with 81 Liberals offset
each other There is 10 part Of the Kingdom there
fore. from which Liberal majority can come
unless the few remaining horougHs stem tie cnrcit
which has swept away the othcTs, or unless the
counties il the presence of all these Torr tr rls
outrun all previous L'bual hopes Mrrcoy~r t'e
same Liberal computation gives the Conservatives
l. seats IN Scotland and IL in ireland, not included
above Upon tie assu"ption that r'c Tories hc'ce-
forward win only tie seats coacclci 10 then. by
The Liberals. tie probabilities now are that the
Tories without the Parncllitcs will nave an actual
majority over the Liberals. {. VI. =.