davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

VIXEN you want a GOOD bowl O
coffee and snula NEE agagimuts, goto
Duaton sReataErat1t.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30
sHlRlNfss aALg,
9efgitcss az lReatat q
Giants 2f Druie

tissgiiikt
A~ignesalil t9wn Ste Co., Hefautia1ts
hs.taes As hereby given sftt ~ virtue al az az.
aeatlort TO fnaditeeted ard delivered slnd nov,
IN my hands. Issued oar OF tse Gteskt othe,. nj
Jbt, ~. jRdisili histaast Gottt, Territory u ps-
5Sota, III ARD Cor the County VI 2rule apoat
iasisinent q Justice efttt and tyeascsapt Of
Judgment. tiie4 ia aissfic5 court MAJ sii 1883
rendered III raid tdlrti n favor ef &bpert Broth
5ffs d GatgpatS. tt.d ;Rrgilet hinlhgJlt Town 8itn
G9ainlfs II on tas Third day ~ MAY a. W.4lSs5i [
haselegia1 upon the faifowing dseGrlpt-i l{eel
Estittlof sii3 aafgibiaiita. to-wit The north tialf
ri pcfta-east quifrtsr See, three. Ia,siahiD tY.re
bauipifeti and t,Fee, Bf4tos slNty-eigilt III iirale
kSso, y Il. srG tflntI stAta on Saturday tl.e fTil
Siap4 q NuFenl5es A y. lss5 iG tie hcar Of I
e'eipco p N. Of SAID day as the front door OF
GilcEii House ii Chamberlain BrRle Go. Do.
that heiisss the l;4st place wnere court wSs acid ii
said courts aid Territory. proceed 10 eel all Tie.
right., 1tlissss aHi nltAFeat oi the aboFt manned
titatali Town Site C~pIapanyia add 10 th8a above
sstserlhsd I~feJrafts to satisfy said JafealaeHt and
costs tspluusttiis TO SltG finadfsi and slS stalt1cs
ai.d f~|arteefs CENTS. together with ali aectuias
costs OF sila and interest IN the same from the
lMs dis pf October l3s5 at the rafa5ui7 ifer cent.
tefsaanurt at pnhfgc asiotiest to the bisfest hid
der for cash.
Moyara i, f3fowIi, 81 j. b. Ryan,
RiRtntilts' Attorney Sheriff t5rlii tte, p.T.
Dated Goi, Ttft ID, U, i2.SS.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

TIE only Veterinary establishment
in soHh Dakota is 4.at Il Collins &
l!Wry in hiGb4li.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

VIII YOU SUFFER- With Dysrepsir and Liver
Gomp!s,at} Siiluh's Nis4ltasr IS guaranteed 70
care YOU,
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

SLsAPLEss NiGIlIGi ,nude miserable pg ,t,4t
eefrih.o eeash. Shiioh's Cure 4, tins rautyy 10y
yoa.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

=. ". lt&t|yg VIII loan money f.;
low rates on tg.fn property.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

THAT HACKING C0Ut.5 eaa be so quickly
eGr9d Is ShiiGlGs Cure. W. gaIeatee i,
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

2tea's Boots d Shoes al actual cost
10 close out al Warmers.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30
40 HNraM

Fresh Oysters Il D~uaten's Restaa.
r3nt.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30
4 Maihar Attr

~ ~ iyyt1lAtd tJaLtSs .t@t
land !bkca nj Mitchell d, /. Oct, 9Th ies5,
s5Nttict IL besiytJ giynn that Che acknowledgements
sftsttlag hiAHtlpG H3siee of his intention 10 Eif.St.
Sydsa1lss proof id srupertp OF his eiaifd and that -aid
proof MiA be made hefareGik hist. Court Brals
No. at fHharnJ1erias oh on NoFnInbes 18Th Iss5
Is@AstGii Grba d. /. M. aN4As; f3t tia MY q
as lfs3-s4 He names fhe following witaesses 4,
sprorEe his sslt iltitoii s rs.s4leatcs my,on and cuitf-5
WESTON ut sasd Inns, viz: santjI kntigisn, Mike
~ atfsek1s Yhon,assJ vhUa, Ait5art ht,wasfi. eli of
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

CATAREH CURED, health aud sweet hraa.h so
aared BY Shlioh1a Gat4rrh l~Ia,ue,iy, Price 80
cent?. &sstl INJECTOR FREQ, Sod by +, II. Miller.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

SUsfMGNs
Territory of Dakota lsa
IN 4 tlstipe's Court Gae1lty Of Brute 80
Befprs II. {, DaflaP J~9sticte ri fhs Itef,ae
e. y Seltsfsaf and -. Y. 9cs+llerR capagtiIs tsbip
nrller the hra, liafas of ttiisner fSf5a. piair-
tifl
SUMMONS
Rs.ni.oid t, iScholt1
The t~IsrritorS ef Dakota aauas greeting to 3lle
above named Detsnaaat: sq1 arc here5s sun
molesi e apgeaf befarN tns, At my eihcc IL the
town OF hinitsiI in said county on tie .a!ad day
nf Nav. A. IL tfs5 at = o'cieok 5. NJ. 70 answer
% tie es2iaptais ef the aiseye nnafantl ptsintjiis
(which coBtslsint Is Iow on hiRIn said once
0iioc!ia5ri ta recover u yon the -sm of eighty
,ilne tailarsalts tygets's fire cents on q lete fissy-
in by sou To said pla'iltiifs IN ihpe. lst iss* due,
JaEuiry ist 1855 Tor $3.50 With interests at S
per cent. And you are hereby NOTIFIED tilat Is
you faii to appear and ;lnsWnr SAID complaint AZ
above reatnses5, Sid plaintiff Will take jut5g-
Inent against you Cor tie SUM of ss9.25 with III
terfest From this date. Attgie tees ard costa Of
his sat. Given tadeF my hard this 221a day Of
aseptsaifsef u. tSs5.
HIS I,niilGp, ggs'iso of the Peace within ana
for Brule comfy. Dci
Gfayer6 Known
Plaintiffs Atty,
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

D h, Long, Atty.
Land gniaiss III al itcIlsii Z. &. si,t. 7tfa issss.
ANpties IL hfrehy gwen tIat aissd ba-iia,stett
sattifr aisg iiiied ps,tica Of hts ntpatien 70 make
Email proof IN p port at This claim md that said
proof Will be made before Judge Probate court
Hrnla ga. ~ Nj Iuberiain u. sr.sun Nos. Ifit.
oa,sn 1ss5 VIZ LySiia Iika y S. No. ssssa2;E2 Tor
the OF NE z Bri0l-sS. Heliatrlcs the fol-
lGuNillg witnesses 10 prove his continuous res.-
datae. z p5il ,sld cultivation us sad land. VIZ;
~ aseph Isastl2 kS a osepllss sf3nlshn, Elmer Burgess
'SsEhsTisB IMylg MsbfsfSiHt u. T.
.s&e $780, Eyerirt. 1tesistpr.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

sBIl4E'S g~lIALiZER % what goa need for
Constipation, Loss Of tppsftta, Dizziness and all
symptom Of Dyspersia. Prize 10 and - cents
per bottle.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

Look out fur n faa li0e Of la:ieS
wool dress sa:tiuE at BaT4in,s nest
wee2.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

$faLoaG COUGH a.& lonsumr on Care 10
sola ny r5 on u guarantee. It cures consumption.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30
49,
TIE kIMEsAGL aFi pune
TIE Gapifai.

-
-I-
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

Sag latae Etels, $ IL or 1hesg aa9 81 ii1l' Porous
PlG8.er. Pfice y acnts.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

Glotbing. Glothing!! Great relue-
tion on clothing aJ BaTd}n's.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

Ohio viii hereafter hold her state
elections in November.
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30

.91 Lo1A
The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1885-10-30
Insurance.

THE rAhNrgr MC-tsL lrstGsSoE Assor.A~
qI5ti' Of iir-ie e3iaiy. !]$asqta. nov lave their
iitliSs ;u4d iSfi2$.,e, and IRE Foadsi3 writR iuii-
oifsVa t2rtlf and Eeis"GRi property Of TURNER'S,
a.sapn t2nA AsGfsacn mi sI2ck ~ large.
association y u,Ia kuti is iaws u Wisconsin.
alg Farmer NiI II -atis:iati tant tiir /, the Vai.
N.Y. to get safe l!iallr,ulcp ftIis ;+,ttts! cs,st. l3il
communication sas1Esi ~ Ht.IspSs"a 10 the SEC
Fet;'rs at hitobali 'rhese piliI6 applications can
te hid.
IL. u i,n.t, f.cs. G. j NGynurl Sec
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
PETTIS. BASSETT & CO..
A CELEBRATED CASE.
Final End of the Damage Suit by Man
Once Condemned to Death.

One of the most remarkable cases ever tried
States Court yesterday. The plaintiff is Lamb
den r Millgan. and among the dozen or more
defendants appear the names of such distin-
guished persons as Oliver P. Morton, Gen. Alvin
p. Hovey, Benjamin Spooner, James r. Slack,
and others, well known in the State The history
OF the case is still fresh in the memory of most
people. Lambden F Millgan, with number of
other men in Indiana, was arrested during the
war as leader in the reasonable conspiracy of
the organization known as the Knights of the
Golden Circle, and after trial before military
commission, was condemned to suffer the pen
atty of death. The sentence, however was COM
muted by President johnson to Imprisonment
for life, at Columbus, 0. The case was car
decision was finally rendered by Judge Davis,
which gave Milligan his liberty on the ground that
his conviction by the military commission was
illegal, because military law had not been de-
ciared IN force In Indiana and the defendant
was therefore, entitled to trial in the civil courts
in the usual way. After his release Milligan en-
tered suit against the members of the military
commission for damages. The case was trans
ferred from the Huntington Circuit Court to the
United States Court in July, 1868, and after
pending TWO years was finally tried, resulting
In verdict in favor of the plaintiff for
90 aud costs. An appropriation was made by
Congress for the payment of the costs, bnt
the government officers were slow in giving at
tention to the settlement Of the matter and the
formalities were never entirely completed. Re-
Gently Noble G. Butler, the clerk of the Federal
Court. opened correspondence with the Depart
nent OF Justice regarding the case. resulting in
the final payment of the costs, amounting to
1886, by the Treasury officials yesterday.
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
FORCED TO SIGN A MORTGAGE.
A Wife Given the Alternative of Mortgaging
Her Property or Supporting Herself.

Before Judge Walker the suit for the foreclos-
ure of a mortgage on the part of Martha E.
Burt. of Hendricks county, against Charles H.
Jenne aud his wife Nellie, was heard. The
mortgage was given on property held jointly by
the defendants, and when the plaintiffs
attorney made the loan of $1,000
to them, he said he could not
loan to either one separately, nor
with the wife becoming surety for the husband
The Hercules Powder Company claims that the
mortgaged property is held in trust for it by
Jenne, because he put into the property $l4 600
of the companys money. Mrs JENNIE testified
that she was only surety for her husband, and,
moreover, that she signed the mortgage
through force. She had refused to sign
it until the night before it was executed
when her husband told her she must either sign
it or take the property and children, and care for
herself. Mr. Cummings testified that Jenne
came to him for the money. He told him he did
not have it. Jenne said he needed it as he had
used more of the company's money than he
ought to have used. The case was taken under
adyisement
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30

W. d. SEAToN, 1.-THE Halter" has the New
Style Hats at 25 North Pennsylvania street
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
A CORPORATIONS BIG FORFEIT.
The Great Risk Alleged to Have Been In
Cured by the Adams Express Company.

Upon the petition of the defendants the dam
age suits of John W. OHarrow and Clarence W.
Jackson against the Adams Express Company
have been transferred from the Circuit Courts
to the United States Court. The suit of O'Har-
row was filed in tt county, and Jackson's com
plant was filed i Hnox county. O'Harrow is
the employe of the Adams company who was
kept under surveillance suspicion of having
stolen money package which was afterwards
found jackson was an employee of the COM
pany at Vincennes and was arrested on charge
of embezzlement preferred by the company, but
was acquitted. In their respective suits for
damages OHarrow and Jackson each asked
judgment for $25, 900.
An important question is raised by a promi-
nent attorney in regard to the action of the
company in having the case transferred to the
United States Court 1t is claimed that under
Section 1929 of the Revised Statutes, relating to
foreign corporations, the company has forfeited
its rights to hold property and do business in
the State by pettionlng for the transfer. The
statute provides that "every foreign corporation
now doing or transacting, or that shall hereafter
do or transact any business in this State. or ac
quire any right, title, interest in or lein upon
real estate in this State, that shall transfer or
cause to be transferred from any court of this
State to any court of the United States, save
by regular course Of appeal, after trial
in the State courts, any action commenced by or
against such corporation in any court of this
State by or against any citizen resident
thereof, or that shall commence in any court of
the United States in this State on any contract
made IN this State or liability accrued therein,
any suit or action against any citizen resident
of the State of Indiana shall thereby forfeit all
right and authority to do or transact business in
this State, or hold real property or liens thereon:
and all contracts between such
porations and citizens or residents of
this State, made after the passage
of this act, shall be rendered void as in favor of
such corporation, but enforceable by such citizen
at his election. The provisions of this act are
hereby made conditions upon which said copor
atoms may be authorized to do business in this
State, or hold titles to or liens on real estate
therein"
The act was passed by the General Assembly
during the session of 1879. and there has never
been any test of its constitutonality. The at
torneys of the express company are Baker Hord
q Hendricks, and it seems altogether improbable
that they should unknowingly make mistake
involving such great risks. Whether not the
cases We're transferred to the federal court with
full knowledge of the provisions of the act
quoted above could not be learned last night.
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
Comment Of the State Press
THE BLOODY SHIRT IN INDIANA.
LIE DhOODf ohIRI
Kokomo Gazette

Koko mo Gazette Tribune.
The Republican party of Indiana must fling
the bloody shirt" to the breeze. A free ballot
and fair count are needed and must be demand
ed in Indiana as well as in the South and if to
demand that is to wave the "bloody shirt we
hoist it now for the next campaign. We want
no more Southern election methods in indiana
The ballot box has been, in the eyes of the aver
age Hoosier, the sacred bulwark of the peoples
rights 1t must not be defled by the LAYING on
of violent hands. If Commissioner Holt is not
to feel the full import and meaning Of Section
2l95, Revised Statutes. then the people will make
the party he represents feel their power and in
fence at the next election by such an overwhelm-
ing defeat that they will not again dare to try
the Ratchet scheme.
NOT THE WAY OF HONEST MEN
Lafayette Can.
The equities in the case can hardly be fixed
without statement of all the different cases of
doubt, and the rulings of the commission there
on, which has not been given; but the breaking
open of the ballot boxes. by force and making of
a count, was clearly unlawful and outra-
geous, matter what were the facts concern
ing the ballots themselves, for the ballot box and
its contents were in the hands Of the court and
courts do not proceed in that way. II the
Republican committeeman was in the wrong, it
was the duty of his colleagues to report all the
facts to the courts and abide its order. That is
the way the honest and law abiding men would
proceed.
NOT DENOUNCED BY DEMOCRATS
Columbus Republican.
Under the direction of the notorious Sim Gov
and John =. Sullivan chairman of the city com
mittee, the box was chopped open with Ratchet
and third count commenced. which was so
manipulated as to give the Democrats two major
ity. The city is very naturally much excited
over this high handed outrage and it is de-
nounced by all honorable citizens; but little do
the scoundrels care who have charge of the party
machinery there, if they only carry their point,
as they seem likely to do.
WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE ''REBUKE.s
Lafayette Journal
Not being able to carry the election at the
polls, the Democrats of Indianapolis are trying
to count their candidates in by fraudulent
manipulation of the ballot-boxes They have
some adopts at that kind of business, but they
are likely to come to grief in the present emer-
gency. We mistake our guess of the people of
the capital city if they do not rebuke the high
handed outrage which has been perpetrated in
the forcible opening of the ballot boxes and
manipulating the ballots in defiance of law or
precedent.
THE MISSISSIPPI PLAN.
Lafayette Journal.
Counting in by fraud is not confined to the
South any longer. The Democrats of Chicago,
Cincinnati and Indianapolis have concluded to
adopt the method which has proved so success
full in Mississippi and Louisiana.
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
A QUORUM AT LAST.
The Aldermanic Board Advance the Saloon
Tax Ordinance to First Reading.

At half past o'clock last night, Aldermen
Endly and Tallentire appeared in the alder
manic chamber, and few minutes later Alder
Following them came Mr.. Cobb, who having
business interests in st. Louis, has not, attended
a meeting for more than six months, but who
came in answer to a pressing summons to at
tend the special session He was received by his
colleagues with great enthusiasm, and hailed as
the long-lost Charley Ross of the board.
President Rorison raped to order, and the
clerk called the roll, the following, all the Re-
publican members, answering: Cobb. Prior,
Prtchard, Endly, Tallentire and Rorison.
President Rorison-We have reason to con-
graduate ourselves, gentlemen, on securing a
quorum. After tomorrow night. suppose our
Democratic brethren will be here, and things
will go on in peace and harmony.
The clerk gave notice that all the members
had been served by the superintendent of police
with summonses calling them to the special
meeting.
At this the three Democratic members of the
board-Messrs. Bernhamer, McHugh and King
who so successfully lodged the serge ant-at-
arms on last Monday night, filed in and took
their seats with great dignity.
Several matters from the City Council were
concurred in, among which were petition from
the Brush Electric Light Company. asking per-
mission to erect poles; to provide for tempo
rary loan of 500 O00 various estimates on street
work, and reports from city officers
An ordinance was passed to grade and pave
with brick the north sidewalk of Ninth street,
from Tennessee street to first alley east of Ten
nessee street.
The following ordinances were read a first
time: To appropriate So. 900 for the State ditch;
to lay sewer pipe from the Home for the Aged
along Michigan street, to connect with the Mas
sachusetts-avenues sewer; to provide an addition
al saloon tax of $48 per year.
The seargeanU-at-arms served notice upon the
members to meet in special session this FRIDAY
evening at 7:3O o'clock. The Board then ad-
journed.
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
Tickets for the Charity Ball.

The regular meeting of the ladies of the
Flower Mission was held at Plymouth Church
yesterday morning at 10 o'clock The tickets
for the coming ball were to have been distrib-
uted to the ladies selling them, but owing to
mistake in the printing were not ready. A
committee was appointed to distribute tickets
and invitations as soon as printed.
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
Ladies, Attention!

We have just received new assortment of
brass fre-sets, tenders, andirons, coal-hods.
coal-vases, all of which we are offering at
duced prices. No trouble to show goods and
invite an inspection whether you buy not.
Hildebrand & Fugate, 50 South Meridian street.
The Indianapolis journal. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1867-1904, 1885-10-30
Is Entitled to a Telephone.

Judge Taylor decided the telephone man
damus case yesterday in favor OF the petitioner,
Daniel NJ. Bradbury. He ordered the company
t. put into Bradbury's Office telephone, and all
the appliances, as understood in the word tele-
phone, for So per month. Exceptions were taken
and an appeal TO the general term was granted.
The Florida agriculturist. [volume] (DeLand, Fla.) 1878-1911, 1885-02-18
THE FLORIDA AGR1CULTURIsT.

Best six head caulihower Abel Penny,
st Johns county, w
Second best six heads, Sanders Ram
sey, 90
Best SIX heads celery, Sanders
Ramsey. Duval county, 3 90
Best bunch parsley, Abel Penny, st
Johns county, 90
Second best bunch parsley. II + Nc
Graw & Son, Buffalo Bluff, Diploma
Best peck okra, Mrs c FShelton, Du-
val county, 90
Second best peck olSra, ] S Parker, Diploma
Best half peck tomatoes, Jordon &
Dukes, Yallaha. 5 90
Best half peck peas in the pod,
Parker Duval county. 90
Second best peck peas, Mrs NJ Park
er, Duval county, Diploma
Best peck snap beans, J D Mckinley,
Duval county, 90
Best half dozen squashes, Mrs L Muir
dock, Duvai county, 90
Best 10 stalks sugar cane, Disston
Company. 5 90
Second best, Jno Huffman, Diploma
Third best, c Mattox, Duval coun-
ty, Diploma
Best half bushel cow-peas Plow Brand
Fertilizer Company, volusia coun-
Second best bushel E Jamison, Du-
val county, : 90
Third best bushel, Mrs A Mcneil
Duval county. Diploma
Best dozen beets, Mrs NJ Parker,Du-
val county. 3 90
Best bushel sweet potatoes, M l. Bro
ward, Duval county. 5 90
Second best bushel, Mrs A c Mcneil,
Duval county, 90
Third best br,shel, A G Castel, Duval
county, Diploma
Best peck peanuts, Mrs Mary Breadal-
jane, Duval county. 3 90
Best bunch radishes, G \ Cobb, Duval
county. : %
Best bushel Irish potatoes, J Parker
Duval county 8 90
Best half bushel turnips, J A Pickett,
Duval county, B 90
Second best, A C Mcneil, Duval coun-
ty, Diploma
Best half bushel Ruta Baga turnips,
] A Pickett, Duval county. 3 90
Best half bushel carrots. E NJ Parker 3 90
Best peck arrow root, Mrs Shell
don, Duval county 90
Second best, Mrs A B Mcneil, Duval
county, Diploma
Best Cassava root. J d Mckinley, Du-
val County, D w
Best West India yams, o Rocks,
Leesburg, . %
Best display of products grown in one
county, Colum bia county 100 90
Best display of honey, w S Hart,
Nolusia county, ~ w
Herald.
The Florida agriculturist. [volume] (DeLand, Fla.) 1878-1911, 1885-02-18
A New Rose.

Few people have an idea of the high
prices that are paid for new roses. One
has lately been produced in England,
called the civilian Francis Bennett. "
An English paper says:
"Mr. Benefits Pedigree Roses, if not
appreciated at their full worth in this
country, appear to be elsewhere. 1t is
stated that an enterprising Philadelphia
plant merchant, Mr.. Evans, has bought
half the stock of the Crimson Tea Rose
William Francis Bennet-for So, 500, and
has legally bound himself not to sell, or
otherwise dispose of any bud, cutting, or
scion, but only the flowers for term of
four years. The rose has made its mark
in the Covent Garden and other markets,
many thousands of its bloom buds hav-
ing been sold at highly remunerative
prices, it being one of the most persist
ent winter boomers"
1t will interest our readers to know
that this famous rose will be on the mar
ket ready to be delivered May ist, OF this
year, instead of 1887. Mr.. Evans having
made arrangements to that effect by buy
ing, we are told, the whole of the origin
ator's stock. The immense amount of
money invested in it will necessarily
make the price high at first, and we sim
cerely hope Mr.. Evans will be well re-
paid for his enterprise.
To illustrate the high value placed on
this rose by florists, we would say that
$500 was offered for one dozen cuttings,
and only short while ago we heard a
prominent rose grower say that he would
gladly give 500 for a single cutting.
Such rose is worth having and we are
gland to hear that several of our adver-
tisers are cataloguion it.