Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1885-10-29

Where the defendant pleads improve
mentS Ia good faith, proof OF the value .ui
the Improvements made, and not the
value OF the land, viii not be sufficient TO
authorize finding upon that issue. The
statute does not award him the value Of Il
the improvements made, but only the I
difference between the value OF the land
with and It's value without the improve
mcnts. Affirmed. Opinion by Robert
son, j.
George Keiselbaum vs.. l.. h Harris,
appeal from Camp. The only as
signmcnt of error Ia the
record Is, "rho court erred IN over
ruling the motion Tor o new trial. The /
ground OF the motion for a new trial Is
that the verdict is contrary to law and /
against the evidence. Under the we'll 1
settled rules OF this court, such an as /
/ signment Is too general TO ho considered, |
| There being no fundamental error IN the
proceedings which can bc noticed in thu
absence OF q proper assignment OF error
the Judgment must be affirmed. Opinion
! by While, CD,
s Leon & II Blum vs., Black, Open.
helmer & Cos appeal from Smith
In the absence OF a statement OF facts
the assignments of error based upon the
refusal of the court To give instructions
the pleadings show that the in
structons were such as must lnevi.
tally have been proper in the case,
A party complaining of the ruling OF the
court in excluding evidence must show
by the bin of exceptions what the evil
dencc would have been. II a refusal TO
allow q witness To answer q question W
! complained OF the bill should show what
the answer would have been, Affirmed.
Opinion by Stayton, j.
: International 4 Great Northern Railway
Company VS. Lydia Gilbert, appeal from
: Gregg Appellee, Lydia Gilbert, pur-
D chased q ticket from Decatur, Ala, TO
, Terrell, Tex When she arrived at Long
, view she asked the conductor of az.
I pelant's train II she was on the right
train, TO which nc replied by telling her
! to keep her seat, Alter the train started
I in the direction of Palestine the oonduc-
! tor passed through the train collecting
! fare and on reaching plaintiff took her
D ticket, destroyed Il and elected her from
l. the train. Held, that the question asked
. by the plaintiff put the conductor upon
y notice that SHE was ignorant OF the run
\ ming of the trains, and the fact that she
o was a woman travelling without q male
+ companion should have made him doubly
s careful to see that She did not take the
Il wrong train, II was no excuse to say
u that She did not show him her ticket, II
i was his duty under the circumstances to
Il call for her ticket, or at least TO inquire
d as to the route she wished to travel. A
y person who hy mistake gets on pasScu'
> ger train other than the one ON which ht
Intended 20 take passage is, never
- 'S a MT, ~
"a ',,1,,,,o, n,,3 oo,.,n. 49, %",,,,o,, it,
"A ,' "''" 49,, ,,,,,,,,, a.,
~ 81 49,, o'I an I,,I p,r,S.,. pni},,a,
No ,,',,,,,, ~ sna M. noso "a
N. , -, -, a,
re ,h..,,,,, ~ ,,,'
~ ,'u'r ~ ~ w.
-. ""l wy WV Ei,5,',, Nv ,, WIKI, ~
mn i',,r,,, M AZ sr,,, N,r,,,,r, lgot,,,,
# ,,,,,,' - tr,i,,,, a,oi fr,,
I'm M ,.' -, -, ,,d,. t'r r.,
In 49, i,,r, a,, oiio,,,,i',n ,n ~ Int
No ~, 81 H., dis.,i,,ion 80 :, ,a,.t,,,,elin ,
- MI, y, Wv t,,fs va. ,,.,,',,nr tr IN
NJ m'.'on Wy go, i,,ir,n, h ,,,a ~
,ir ~ ,,,.s,r ,,i ,3,,I Snr,t,
,'V'1 III. a. ~ r,,s,,s,' nf shor,,,
nj ,' 800 ii,,, AZ, ,r,,,,, ,tis,Ii'
an ti,' 49,, iIIIni,,, lis ardIna,., g,oc
m t ,',, a a,,d nn, as ,,rn,,nb of ds,aSes
~, NV, s,'i,toct ~, ,,,,cn,,tion
~ ny ,ri,, M, ,',i,, hor,,ol ,, iur, IA,
~ ,iS h,t',,I,',, ,o,o,,r,d f,r,, ~ ni,tnt,
az a,.a aIi,,,'I it, riIe mo-, 4, trci,,l
' '.iJ bo ,.as ra,eor,,nr within ii
1911 M i,c AMI M Gntonds,
he ~ i',,nd Ia, ttn sa,,o dcyroc ~ carr ,
WE opV =, , ng Wv s"a,,or trsin I,el
. iat H., >. S IL ,i,l,, c,,ract p y ~
.''"' t 1'o - o5 ~ ooS. Thn,nnson
G w., possononr, - 81
,oi" ",,, az ,l,rn, urhoco
WHo q; "s, rt;,s,,,, ~ oiro 80 IA, inv u
he ,nltrncti,ns osl,d 5v drfondont MN
ins'' u0t , "SNOu ~ 49,, t,',,i,,si,,',
=, otIcu lIo'h ohV w NIt''h HiNl"sNN'