Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1885-08-05

be-. o.. oil s q o o s
4 IN, Observation-Disclosures. %
e,0 ................,.. l7g ~
+, p,s ................. ! 90
a N Erwin and Othcrs.,..,..,........ US ~
\ M arcouut OF J. NJ. Hartsfcld for the
4 d $3.50, account cost in the suit OF
4 ,laboncy VS.. the City, which had
a sou,ly been referred to the city attor-
4 III examination, was by him reported
N M and upon motion Of Alderman
. ssgy allowed
account OF James w. Swayne,
for expenses incurred while attend
A bihe suit OF the city at Austin and
klYh the capacity Of city attorney. hay-
a seI referred back to the council by
i shlms committee, was the subject
\ aptb talk. 4 vote was finally reached
n he account not allowed.
IIm account OF Smith \ Bardon for in
Il upon unpaid and overdue accounts
y committee reported upon as having
&athorty TO pay, since the original
Niucl called for no interest. Upon
sOn OF Alderman Daggett the report
n received aud the account not al
H.
1t account OF II II, Early, city clerk,
n slGS,gs was upon motion allowed.
icoul of Pan-Elcctric Telephone
for the use of phone at the cen
n arcmen's hall, amounting to 50 90,
h Supon motion allowed.
account of same company for phone at
~ Of Dire departments residence
Fffcd not paid,
Ernaiority report of the street and
ggcommittee upon the petition Of A..
\ Briilon and others, signed by Alder-
n Barter and Alexander, was uS fol-
n Thai We believe that Houston street
Il once open across said railroad tracts
ever end OF Houston street.
4 That the same has been closed by
A aroad company To the great dctri-
fa'ol property owners on said street,
4 'Aal We believe that II il the duty of
n eaycouncil to see that said obStruC-
~ ae removed, or some other salts
Hop arrangements be made by which
a property might not be further dam
y lla' we, yonr committee, would
,a'ehu that said railroad company
3 Y some suitable plan by which the
Flucuohs can he removed, so as not to
slfllaenlal to the property owners on
suvet, and suggest that said cross
"A . oFneu up as 1t formerly was, and
pes'reet be continued accordingly
'nalsht line across said reservation,
n uaMeslon avenue, or to the alley
y nalh street south of said reserya-
= INTO Main street by continuing
~, NJ. street. $, 20 c. into Main street.
sus 'lls council give said railroad
XIV .nlrly days to decide which
Nv uesire said street opened on,
,% event That said railroad com
= ~u.a desire a bridge across said
NY they let this council know what
<I ''s'lllngtod do towards building che
w. a. DARTER.
e< tl, j. L. ALEXANDER.
l barier spoke at length in
n,, nv N'llle Alderman Daggctt, who
4 Il, MN minority report, spoke adj
+ IN ' ~ ne said II was a bad idea to
" company to terms, etc
III n , uu Aldridge thought the city was
n ,nul'ion OF sick man who re-
axe medicine.
Y I, T sn discussion and before ar
IA h,s conclusion, Alderman Alex
III lthrttv'' a previously prepared
81 parties. "'''''' ''e'''" 10
's,u'an Daggett Withdrew his
nnsn tugport, and, upon motion OF
ti,d ,sneS, the resolutions werr
y .udmen, 9''ncr with an mimportani
,.n ,'porbof the committee an nr,nt
i. rsio sa upon the account of |. Carb,
4 goi GS.'nea That he be allowed 500
( "a acr ~, ,,.a'm OF Ss0.iS, as a bal
ahec. an I'M, OF the printing of the
+ b. lld,,, ~ tAe board voting ave, ex-
IN IoIlalileh Daggett and barter
comD H,lg report of the water
+ lsd, ANA Nas- then received and
Y lqpmbi, proposition OF the Fort
6l + sogr c ou company accepted:
!, lan Nm. ~ on water-works.
-del Il 'slerred the petitions of W,
y IT'D, sirs' u, $. Holmes 81 al.
,,slass 4,S,kaoery Ct al, n. q. VOCAL
M ay h water mains be laid bv
hen gisaln streets therein
{ W. pn,vo,. "aye to recommend
Y, NIX 1ysfs of the petitioners bc
Aond, N'as portion Of The nusoId
r d tnoo now IN New YORK No
- tSer', Tue market and he
pbes,il sot spilled 70 laylnD wa, ''ae
apparent Nalesl demand for
oilhlon M, '9ur committee are
l = aeoeleS' u, II the policy Indicated
ny we Naler-works would