Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1885-05-19

SUPERIOR COURT.
Department one-suilivan, Judge.

MONDAY, May is, 1885.
People VS.. T. II. Reynods-On trial.
People vs.. January-Sentence postponed for
two weeks
tiers issued to both petitioners, Francis Van
Hcusen and Charles Van Heusen; bond, $, 900
Appraisers, J. L. Huntoon, p. BOIL and G. ".
Baker. Notice in REcoED-UNIoN.
Estate OF Charlotte Miller, deceased-Letters
issued to LeOna Miller bond, $500. Appraisers
K. J. Fletcher, y Butler and f. G. Warehouse
Estate Of Frank Keller, deceased-Order Of
final discharge entered.
Estate of Martin Nonsch deceased-N e.
Curtis appointed to represent minors-W. T.
Mousch, NJ. g. Monsch and Allen c. ". Monsch.
Estate of W. 7. Lefavor, deceascd-Order
granted to sell real estate bond, $1,000.
Estate of Henry Anderson, deccased-Con-
tinued.
Estate of r. j. Peters deceascd-Order for sale
of real estate entered.
Estate of Thomas Nichols, q minor-COntirma-
ton of sale of real estate granted.
Estate of Edward Dorset, deceascd-F. II.
Russell appointed administrator.
Estate OF r. A Rodman, deceased-Continued
one week.
Estate of T. II. Jackson, dcceased-Order en-
tered confirming sale OF real estate.
Guardianship of Carrie Shaw ct al.-Annual
account of guardian allowed.
Estate of Walter Cannon, deceased-Con
tinued one week
Estate of Charles N. Beard, deceased-Order
entered tischarging executor
Estate OF Martha Harrington, deceased-Order
to sell real estate entered.
King vs.. MeiSter-Contlnued.
Department Two-McFarland, Judge.
MONDAY, May IS, 1885.
Green Il Trainor vs. State of California-Argu-
ment CT demurrer continued until June LIST. and
cases to be set for trial in June term. Counsel
for defendant given five days to file special de-
muTrer.
r. C. Hoagland VS. State of California-same
order.
George Cooper vs.. State of CaIifornia-same
order.
james Reid vs.. State Of California-same
order.
Jas. Henderson VS.. State of Califomia-same
order.
J. N. Hoagland vs. State of California-same
order.
W. 3. Todhunter vs. State of California-same
order.
Henry Leinberger vs., State of California
Same order.
Davis Anderson VS. Charles swanton-Pro-
ceedings stayed until bond is filed by plaintiff
Further ordered that defendant have five days
after notice of the filing of the bond to plead.
Oliver Sanders vs.. Finn ct al-A. C. Hlnkson
appointed guardian ad Item in this action.
Margaret Nichols VS.. Ezra Nichols-Decree of
divorce granted. Custody of the minor children
awarded to the plaintiff defendant to pay the
plaintiff 50 per month for the support OF said
children.
California StGte Bank vs.. Hamburg Bremen
Insurance Company-Continued for two weeks
Friend 4 Terry Lumber Company VS.. f. n.
Bush ct al.-Motion to retaX costs denied.
Peter c. King VS.. Central Pacific Railroad
Company-Demurrer sustained. Plaintiff de
Ginning to further amend, judgment entered for
the defendant.
Edward Malone vs. n Mcdonald ct al.-De-
murrer overruled. One week to answer.
Thomas DwYer VS.. J. McIsaacS-Demurrer
oyerruled. Ten days to answer.
w. II. Clark VS.. Mary Clark-Demurrer over
ruled Defendant declines to answer.
Daniels VS. Henderson-Contin one week,
George W. Chesley VS. /; S, Barnes-Passed
Falconer vs.. RamGge Continued one week
John Reynolds vs.. l.. NJ. Lincoln-Continued
until 10 a. NJ tomorrow.
Ketie L. o Brien ct al. vs. Patrick Riley ct al
Demurrer Withdrawn. PlaintifftakeS judgment,
as prayed for
Red Jacket Tribe, No 2S, VS.. J. A. Gibson ct
| al.-Cost bill retaxed by striking out the sum of
! 81 10.
J. l.. Garrett vs.. Central Pacific Railroad Com
pany-DemUrTer oyerruled, and defendant given
until June list to answer Case to go on the June
trial calendar.
Emma Gould VS.. Simeon Gould-Continued
one week
Geo. Atkinson VS.. Amador and Sacramento
| Canal Company-Cont nued.
| Estate of +. l.. Billings, ACKNOWLEDGMENT
| that the moneys remaining in the hands of the
administrator be distributed among the heirs of
F. L. Billings. Further ordered that the sup
plemetal account be allowed, approved and
| settled.
People vs. Patrick Campbell, on habeas cor
pus-rhe defendant having fully satisfied the
| Judgment against him by the payment OF the
| fine imposed upon him for contempt of Court in
| the action of Iuba Company VS.. Golden Gate
| Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Company it is
| ordered that this writ of habeas corpus be and
the same is hereby dismissed.