New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1885-11-24
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
DECISIONS IN VARIOUS CAsEs-AN AMENDMENT Tc


WASHINGTON, Nov. 23.-AmOng the cases
upon which the Supreme Court of tho United States de-
liyered Its opinion TO LAY that OF Thomas Drew
and Edmund Wobb against the executors OF Moses H.
Grlnnell Collector OF tho port OF NewIork IL was
brought up on IA OF from the Circuit Court OF
the United for the Southern Dstric Of New YORK.
The pln IN error imported quantity OF spotted
or dotted net" but which found In reality
lace component part OF chief value being SILK Dnty
was collected by Collector Grnne the rate Of 80 per
cent adyaorcm the rate hxej by law upon SIX laces
The importers commended that the merchandise was SUBJ
feet only TO duty of 80 per manufacture Z" of
which silk the component material OF chief value,
not otherwise provided for" The Circuit Court found
verlct the defendant and the Supreme Court abrs
tho ina ,nent Opnlou delivered by Justice Batchtord
IN the case Of Mott and Field against stephen Kurz.
appealed from the superior Court OF the City and County
OF IAN Francisco the decision the lower
vrrscd The effect OF this decision is that neither
police officer private citizen In his capacity as such
Of military authority deserter from the United
Tho other business Transacted by the oour was fol-
lows:
No. 81 II BQhcn plaintiff in erroE agt Mch2r Arthur
G ap gr ne, eern ufstrct ~ pooDsyv5ntt
Judgment aGrmcd with costs Opinion by Justice Batch
40 lG--wnam Gibson, p,an!tr IN error sgt Edward
states oT the Eastern District Of PenasY Judgment
affirmed ~ith costs Up by Justice Matthew'S ~ r.
TIC o. Coud ud.m;nt oilrmei and interest.
~. I6tJo'n s. racr end others, pllnrf u error at
iowa Decree Affirmed Win costs BY Justice
e. '2 2 eesc s9qcaq9l , qis c Sr9 Of gaPpG
~m"s .r tle No.il IN .ntrc o. Ii'o@ Decree airmci
10. o. M lts,oiu "a ac .uf,ld Company. pnntiT
30 c'ior 90, i,cr iwnes - error 20 ihc sup n, court
| Opinion D., Just cr Field.
20 5,-ric Missouri Pacific Eailrold Company, plaintiff
IN 20 the Court
fuc STAGE ot Missouri. judgment affirmed with costs
~ e1 i.,g;on aole.n as, t., A ~, , cqaPy an!
FOR tn' District Oh Ec1LuCNy Irc,e a1rnc. with costs
Np5'-rhr ~ LOUIS !-oa N.lut.iH ana soIthcrn Ran.
49, w. irt ,f he 10 og i.sanrj Jii, 1eUt
r xxx ,c.-. Ct,I,nl y Cli Ius.icc w.fe ''''
IN Sr to ra1 f S' oar o,hc srl, q coaa5s
Judgment auiun,d with costs by DIVIDED Court,
No l3-E - Iau sen, appellant, AIT tho Chesapeake
~ l ~ m e tres for me tttn DiTict s Of
virginia Decree affirmed with costs opinion BY Chisf
so ~ GoJt.ned Bachmann appellant, the Chesa
ES say al o te - 5 G stRn pS S Of i
T. Decree Affirmed with costs. opinion by Chief Justice
! 70 Gs-Mr'. Laura Ellen Jones, widow etc. palnudin or
Court Of tn United states Tor the Distrc
Gna Juilnc1t affirmed Opnion by
g. Isl " Leonard, and others appellants agt. W II
NO Ilt,JW conn,a and others eppeuants agt. tho
/ IDEAS denied. opinion by Chiet Justice Waite
The Chle Justice announced the following ORDER Or
dercd by the that the 33d rule Of this Court
! amended SO 10 read as fOllowsi
MopIGs DIAGRAMS AND EXHIBITS or MATERIAL.
l. Models diagrams ana exhibits oi material forming
part OF the evidence taken IN the court below, in any
cnse pending this Court writ OF appeal,
shall he placed IN the custody Of the marshal OF this
Court least month before the case is heard
submitted.
Q Al models, diagrams and exhibits Of materials
placed the custody of the marshal for the Inspection
OF the Court the hearing OF "A be- taken
away by the parties within month after the case Is
decided when this IL MT done II shall BE- the duty
the masha notify the counsel In the case, by mail
otherwise OF the requirements or this rue and II the
article are removed within reasonable time alter
the notice Is gwen he shall destroy them make such
other disposition uf them a. to MIN may seem best.
No 9ji-Harriet \ Burnett, appellant. agt. the United
states. SuAmte ulpcr 2lth rule 4 Norman for
appellant and solicitor General G00dc FOR Ppd' lice.
SO 2lO-Ihe United states plaintiff error. agt. Dcn
Price. Submitted under 2Oth rule By .e-
land FOR the Ulnln and by George defendant
|
lpuS William ii ls7lll. trustee appellant, :
Wilcox others Motion 10 dismiss Riim united by
alctt Philips In support OF motion and BY George Bid
/ die in opposition thuretO
No nG9-AnEIs NJ Cannon. plaintiff IN error, ag the
United states Argument be, ln bl sol c0r General GOOde
for The defendant In rrOt and concluded by Richards
for plailtih IN error
No 72-Wliam Marvel plalntr n error aSt E \ Meg
rift late collector Argued by solicitor General Code
Tor the defendant and submitted by Lee for the
plaintil In
no 7g-trmGn Pros5cr plaintiff eprlP agt The People
OF tue state .. Illinois Argument begun by Allen story
| Tor the plaintiff III