The Indianapolis sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1880-1904, 1885-05-10
COURTHOUSE LOCALS.
Several New Suits F,ssd In the Various
tours.
Twelve Additional Paragraphs OF An.
aver IN the Famous Hanway Suit
Notes from the Corridors.

II ere were thirty huildgng permits issre1 l.st
week sggreGating 81 80.
Austin F. Denny has given :: 90 bonds a.
guardian OF Corycon K. Mclaughlin. recenllg de-
ciared insaLe
Christina Keeper fas qualified as guardian Of
Mary snd Anna koepeer, minor heirs OF Fred
srick Keeper. ceccssi 3.
Judge Taylor ytsitrtisy granted n divorce IN
Mary Bacon from Kirk hsCUn. on proof II cruef
treatment sid fassEIc 0 provide.
Judge Howe yests'dsy granted divorce 70
Emma Schwinge from Eawsrd SChwinge. on proof
OF drUpKenness anG fEusl tT.atGnenL
Franklin Vonnegut Las given S7s.5c0 tonds a.
guardian OF AieXarosT and benno Schmidt,
minor heirs CT Robsrl schmidt, deceased.
The County Board r. sisr6ay allowed o. ". Has
selnan 81 5s5 Cowie x ADAM. on their sixth esii.
mate OF work cone on tie work house. 81 $50:
City d srensaTy, q, o. sud about 500 IN small
accounts.
served $50 notices TO oitsn vaults and premises,
and put Up 20 healta Tags. Officer Barker made
IS visits 10 the saush 'er houses and stock PEN.
and condemned IS enluss.
Louisa Hendricks has fled suit against PHILIP
Franklin and Others 20 II, spas. alleging that o.
bly,, broke down the fsnces destroyed the herb
age. dug excavations. he complaint IN in two
paragraphs. Demsnc. S .e0'-
In the suit OF Itase Jones " BENJAMIN Thorn
ton ct al. motion ior s new trial was oyeTruled
by Judge Howe ycs,e,csy. Plaintiff SUD for
dsmsges alleging be had been under srtest on a
charge OF larceny. ne'ei dants denied the arrest
and the Jury returned 2 verdict ior the defense
John b. Powers bss 5ei for divorce from AIice
Powtrs, whom he nsr led ia December, lsS He
ALLEGES abandonment DUNG the same month,
and cruel trestment f.einuG lives at act ~, and
is OF the man referred to ia yesierda Is sec
not be had been married, as his children and
Deighbors alleged.
Amanda Prics has filed for divorce from vii
liam Price, whom SIC mssrled Ia KENTUCKY IN
1870. They have two children. Amanda alleges
abandonment failure 10 proyice snd cruel treat
ment. IN September &c Grew kuife and tried 10
kill her. he has tatea aTGy all their household
goods and left ~ithout means of support.
Pe'ilion is made for ainODy and tie custody OF
the children.
John w. and Isabella D. Maxwell have flsda
suit 10 forclose lnoTtssfe siven by Kate T. Cole,
lince deceased, on C ram lots IN Brown and Nor
sis on's So bdi vision enslout secure the pay
ment of two notes for 81 2C0. There is siil Que
balance OF s. SEQ. J. Is alleged that the properly
mortsaeed has been Csec rs boarding-house snd
taxes have not been psid, ard the property is
going 10 waste. Petition is made for the appoint
ment OF o receiver for The rents and profits
In the suit Of Felix Davis vs.. Annie Davis, for
divorce, Judge Walker fUund adversely 10 the
plaintiff The charge was abandonment but the
proof WIS too veal. Plaintiffs attorneys wanted
TO dismiss the suit but the Court held that IL
could not he done. saying that the case he'd been
immunity at large was interested in the fair adj
minit.retion OF the aw IN such cases. The PAT
ties he held. should OF be divorced: and he did
rot think they should be allowed to dismiss so
TO re file the suit il another court. The parties
aIe coloTed.
In the case of the State ex rel. W. A Pfaf. Audi
tor of Marion COUNTY. Samuel Hanway ct al.
the defendant yestefasy fled twelve additional
paragraphs of answer. there being eight para
sIsPPhs aIiere that 81. June. is7s HanHsy, under
Section 925 OF the Statu G. made full settlement
with the County BOARD which was approved. snd
elusive. IN the ninth paragraph II Is claimed that
the county is indebted 70 Hsnway IN the sum OF
Tnieh 10 ne se m sss. O9 S CAIN sot %
tiff, which amounts to $500 10 $4,000. The tenth
Par s5Ssn aeSee t ~ 'ne b. nn the
thirteenth section OF the act OF June H. 1852. re-
latiDg 10 the organization OF county boards etc.
which is Still in force the board passed an order
providing for the complete audit OF all The &C.
counts Of Treasures. and that sfierward the
By their acts uncer the statute, aEd that
the bond sued on Is not now their
cHsrge fiom ell iiabiiiy Under the bond after the
accounts were audited that certain securities ha1
been given by harwsy 10 Fletcher and New. two
of the bondemen, which were surrendered after
the foregoing action OF the County Board and be-
fore the beginning OF the suit aud that they are
thirteenth paragraph alleged that in August,
1850 Willis W. Wright was elected County
Ires.uTeT Tor three 5esrs term and and sierw v,
fee two years. Hanway's term began in August.
1877 and expired in two years. bat his successor
began, which Increased bis liability for two weeks
longer than his bond called Tor, and thereby In
creased DIS liability Against his NIL am
The fourteenth paragraph is substantially tbs
same as the preceding paragraph. Inc fifteenth
grsph alleges hat the bond sued on IS illegal
and void. because Hsnvay was elected for two
years term from August ). ls77. but that Jackson
September g. 1877 and was recognized as the legal
Treasurer by the County Commissioners. which
action on their part is claimed 10 be Tele-se from
and seventeenth. The eighteenth ard nineteenth
allefe a difference OF sisC0 occasion d by the
running over OF Mr.. LGnders' term into danway's
term.