Salt Lake evening Democrat. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1885-1887, 1885-11-07
A TRIO OF U. C'S.
Henry Grow Says He Is Not Guilty
of the Charge,
While Keddington Owns Up to 1t Like
Little Man.
Brother Foulger Arraigned on Three
Indictments for His OfIense.

This being the day set for Henry Grow,
John w. Keddngton and Herbert j.
Foulger to appear before the Third Dis
trict Court and enter their plea to the
charge OF unlawful cohabitation, the trio
presented themselves, with the following
results:
HENRY GROW WAS THE FIRST ONE
Called, and the indictment found by the
Grand Jury was read, charging him with
living unlawfully in the marriage relation
from 1882 to October, 1885, with Julia Il.
Grow and Emily s. Rawlins as his wives.
On being asked his answer to the charge
against him, he pleaded not guilty, and
was allowed to go for the present on n
continuing bond from Commissioner Nc
Kay's Court.
JOHN w. KEDDINGToN
Listened to the indictment charging him
with unlawful cohabitaton from 1888 to
May, 1885, with Aquilla f.. Keddington
and Mary Jane Tall, in the marriage rela-
ton rs his wives. He entered u plea OF
guilty, and by request the Court post
poned the sentence for two weeks from
to-day, and Keddington was released
until the DIST inst. on the bond given in
the Commissioners Court. Friends OF
the defendant believe that he will take
the sensible road out Of his present
troubles by promising to obey the laws
in the future and thereby save term in
the Penitentiary.
HERBERT j. FoLGER.
Superintendent of the Twentieth Ward
| Coop, was the last of the U. C's to face
the Court, while the clerk administered
to him triple dose Of the unpalatable
remedy furnished by the Grand Jury fol
his stubborn complaint. The first in.
dictment set forth that the defendant had
lived the criminal life of cohab. with
Eliza Ii. Foulgcr and Charlotte Maris
Hall as his wives during the period be
tween January LIST, 1884, and December
3lst, 1885. Folger pleaded not guilty t.
the charge and was about to retire OIL
the continuing bond now holding him TO
trial, when the clerk politely informed
the self-assured defendant that there wa
another document to which he desired t
his attention.
A SECOND INDICTMENT
For unlawful cohabitation, covering tn
period of time passed between January
1885, and October |, 1885, was read, an
Foulger answered rs before, "Not guilty.
But this was not all, and the wilful vic
lator OF his country's laws suffered al
other repetition of the effectual antidot
for U. G..
THE THIRD INDICTMENT
Embraced the happy time passed b
Foulger with his plural wives from d,
! cember LIST, 1882, up to December, 1888;
A plea OF not guilty was entered alongsid
the two former ones, and the Cou
allowed the continuing bond to answ,
for the first count, but obliged the defenc
ant to furnish 81 900 sureties for each
the other two charges. Foulger reptile
that he could getallthe bonds demande,
p and a deputy marshal escoted him dow
. town among his friends.
: 1t would seem that doubling the do
would prove sufficient to knock all IL
romance OF going to prison and being
: martyr out OF any Latter-day Saint, al
= , to make the treatment three times strol
!, seems next to sure death to the unlawf
practice of living in the marriage relate
with more than one woman.