The Indianapolis sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1880-1904, 1885-02-21

land. We cannot evade the responsibility
II ee refuse TO allow the evil e5.ct- Of those
narcotics 10 be taught in the paoiic sch pols.
Mr.. WILLARD demanded tie previous
question.
The Senate refused to second the demand
by yeas 20, nays p.
Pending the roll-call-
Mr.. MCINTOSH said: II I understand il
Alright. II the demand for the previous cues
ton is seconded and the Senate refuses to
sustain the motion TO strike the enactlng
claute from this bill, the bill will be carried
10 the engrossment without giving chance
TO amend t. T. therefore, vote no"
Mr.. THOMPSON said: l am Ia favor, in
the abstract, OF tee ching morals Ia the poO
lie schools. think il OF the highest i'm
pOItsnce, and that We owe Il 70 the childTea
OF the State hut this idea Of making il
statute appesrs TO me Is not good policy. As
1t is ! don't suppose there is 3 school Ia the
Commonwealth but what the eff-cts Of alcO-
hol taught. The tea cher that don't do il
ought to be turned oct. But this bill says
it is not TO be taught till next September.
think that develops q job. There is prob
ably some man who has book that will be
out about that time. ard he expects the
schools 90 adopt it. / vote aye"
The vote was then announced as above.
The motion to strike out the enacting
clause was also rejected By yeas p, nays 3.
Pending the roll-call-
Mr.. DUNCAN. of Brown, said / am op-
D sed to the bill, but desire TO see its friends
receive fair treatment, and would like to
meet that question squarely. Therefore
vote no"
Mr. FAULKNER: want to explain my
vote. While / want to give every body fair
chance, l want to get ri d of this sometime or
other. Therefore | vote aye"
Mr.. MAY: / simply want to say that
am not in favor of this summary way of
killing bill in any legislative body There
fore ! vote 40"
Mr.. MCCLURE: Ali the explanation 1
have is that I wish TO give the friends OF
this bill fair chance, and l consequently
vote no.
Mr. MCCULLOUGH said: | AN in favor
OF fair dealing. but think this bill has had
more than a fair chauce-a great deal more
than a fair chance. 1t had more discussion
than il was entitled TO before the motion to
lay on the table was made. There are bat
Ten or twelve days before the close OF this
session, and if we going to discuss bills of
this sort and that sort a great deal of i'm
portant legislation must 90 over. The SEN
are shou d not spend hours and hours upon
a bill they all have their minds made up en-.
l am opposed to it oil the time, and am will
ing 70 90 on the record as opposed to it with.
out any discussion. / vote ave"
Dir. RAIN The same reasons | gave
when / made motion 70 lay the bill oa the
table. are the same reasons l shall vote in
favor of this motion; because there is no use
IN fOoliDg away our time; and there Is no
chance 10 pass this bill here or ia the other
H0uze. I vote aye"
Mr.. WEIR said: As the amendments
proposed show, am opposed to some o: the
provisions. while the OBJECT of the bill ! em
in favor OF. But there WAS no opportunity
allowed 10 offer amend nents, therefore ]
think the friends OF this measure have not
been treated IN such manner as they are
entitled to upon question OF Sc much i'm.
portance. ] therefore vote no "
The vote WAS II en amour ced SIS SbDTe.
nr. WILLARD moved % iGdefi nitely
postpone the bill.
The motion was agreed tO by yeas q,
, nsvs y.
Then came a recess for dinner.