Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1885-09-11
sgTTLED AT LAST.
.nsr war In Fort Worth is
~ N s.s,d, and Harmony Once
'' More Prevails.
,rn and viii be Introduced
..fhilt y n..,,,c To. Morrow as the
y ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.

..,of the suspension OF the
" ,.h GAZETTE and its subsc-
IN s,.nmption is familiar TO all
~ s,asrs, and it would be an act
~ H"N ,,ation to again publish the
~ .noected with II in these col
~ ,nmediately after the suspension
% 4 ,rrrK the business men'of the
=. ,or,us under misrepresentation of
sg' a thinking that The GAZETTE
',.ls Ssi resume publication formed a
~ ,oupany and launched again upon
~ a journalism the Daily Democrat.
an undertaking that required
IA eylnced the fact that the peo-
. HnI Az city will be deferred from
mai viii rebound TO the welfare
w. .s,.nerlty Of Fort Worth. In "A few
q r .ter the Democrat appeared The
w ~ resumed publication, and
es~r claimed to be news
W VAR was commenced, The
" l.oprs of rival towns referred
ii ~ so.called discussions here
80 Of exultation, and did all that
~ done 20 stir up strife between
a.e journals and thus destroy that
rt%s of action that has IN all past
% characterized the business ele-
wv II Fort Worth. The man
lots of the two paperS-THE
,y,Tr and the Democrat--soonr realized
y M that no two morning papers
.dl i've in Fort Worth; that while the
.bisss Of the city would handsomely
-oort one good paper, that supported
rt'l would be of no benefit TO either.
4 ~ heinr the case, overtures were made
| .,rb management to the other, but
4, while il seemed that no solution of
.problem could be arrived at. Propo-
sdn after proposition was made, first
ouq side and then by the other. MIR.
lcrge b. Loving on behalf of THE GA
m Printing company ut one time of
mi either to buy the Democrat or sell
I'm GAZETTE, but his proposition
|,k rejected on account OF
N. prlce placed on THE GAZETTE
|vd there was no desire to aban-
|S,athe Democrat enterprise. Day after
N psssed by until yesterday, when 1t
az determined by both the management
|draE GAZETTE and the Democrat that
n,iiers should be brought to crisis,
na an amicable settlement of differences
,ranged. A meeting was settled on be-
lttn Mr. George b. Loving and Mr..
George Spiller on the part of THE GA
NTH, and Major X. NJ. Van Zandt, Cap
lain B. b. Paddock and MIR. j. w. Swayne,
o. behalf OF the Democrat. The meeting
VS. held in the office of the Fort Worth
gi,Onal, when the situation was freely
discussed by all parties interested. After
Qute lengthy meeting solution of the
Eoblem was arrived ut by Mr.. Loving
agreeing to dispose of the Daily ant
Weekly GAZETTE, together with all Its
tights and franchises, except the job Of
tre and TIE GAZETTE building
yaIchremain the property of Mr.. Loving
'hrthe sum of $4,000 cash. This propo
shon was accepted, and the closing o.
Ah transaction ends the threatened
newspaper war and restores harmony il
he city.
TIE new management Will take charge
III TnE GAZETTE office to-day, and til,
PAPER will appear tomorrow morning a.
lar DEMoCRAT-GAZETTE. The change
hhe name is the result of n compromise
Both sides were welded to the name o
their paper and would not consent TO /
aslng completely merged into ne other
therefore, the hyphenated title was settled
upoe, and by 1t the paper will be known
Ia the future. The follow
as are names - of the gentle
neA who are the Aincorporator
q the new company: b. b. Paddock, j
l,Smlth, W. l., Malone, w. A,Calloway
&c, Sentef, George b. Hendricks, S. NJ
Fr, 7. A. Tidball, j, w. Spencer, sgd
NY Mhrtln, :. p. Tucker, w, =. Pendle
ioh, WIG. Turner, Joseph II. Brown, X
y, Van Zandt, WA. Huffman, James W
NTsgne and C. j. Swasey. AS will read
woe seen, the above names represent
aise amount of capital, and so long Il
ae gentlemen have guaranteed staunc
sapportto the enterprise, there can be II
eonata as to the future fortunes OF tn
paper