The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1885-10-24

want to make the levles referred to,
| ny virtue OF that precedent, they
could nave refused, NOTWITHSTANDING
the Democrat says the county was
made responsible by the Republican
Board. connected win the item OF
S2,OSO, levied IN 1854, TO be applied
to the bonded debt OF the School
Board, as well as with the entire
debt, there Is history. The School
Doalu ''"9 always oeel De'iiocra'lc ;
1t e'"'i"c'eu d ueo' VI 9lo'ooo "'t'iou.
au ''l''i'S Vi ''"' IL 1907 ny 1A'. Vi
A9Se","'E '.'' i"'9'''', "'''''''' '''''
ue"' H'''o'' ~ ''''''''''' ny '"0 co''i'S
c"'ii''''9'' D''''9 ''o'''''S ""''"7' "39
ou','i''''e'i ~ NC WIZ vi '''e P'"pie'
anu "''0 ''''''''''' u ~ d ''''J'' 40 VI ne
N"'v9' -N"' ''''''''''"'''S 'i'e leSu''
vi ''''' N''e' d Il" wa" e'I"v.e" u"
l"01 ''''"o'" INV emu - VI 9NEF''
oV''S an" o''"'""' "p'"'Ne'' Wy ~
]
county commissioners 10 ISSUE Hones
l" pay 'laI "eo'' WITHOUT permitting
'ie people |" nave Il voice III ttfe
'i'"''er' 'l'u9 III" NIi'S II d "ep' "i Vhe
Deinocra'lc party by Whom II was
cast upon l'e TAX payers ana ms
sum vi 2-'ooo IL Tue 'r9t ItFy upon
acc"u". Vi t''aC "r"' "h'ch WIN run
through II PERIOD Vi elghteen Years
"el''f'''V - I'S''0'
Admitting, however, to be frue
| that the present Board was Obliged
to provide for SI436l SO more than
the preceding Board, and S9,l1991
Of which it should have provided for.
| there is still to he accounted for, but
which is not, the sum S4,493.49 to
make up the difference between 1888
and 1884. Nor does the democrat. as
we have said, attempt to account for
the difference between the leVieS 1888
and 1888, except by saving that heavy
eynanJituras Unrn rodo for briagoc
I'D ,La,, ,o.,,.o,l, i,;,,..a,c...,I ,-';e.,
'''i" '''0'' W O''i0o'e 'ii'iioe'' anu p''''lS
the tax payers says that the rate
this year is no larger than it was in
! 1877. But let us see. the rate this
vaar i q az and far 1877 = wos
% go
9i'oo' ana W"u'u nave neeh very
much less had it not have been'fOr
the assessment law of 1876, WHICH
Mr.. r. ~ Rrowninu as member of
the T,aUislature voted f,r and for the
i,oo,,,7a,oa+ o-,,o,',,u, anaHntod ~
-,N''' - ''0''t ",7N''''' "pr'''''ND g
MI bF""hlhg'S suggestion ana re-
quest, and which cost the county
| S4,6S5,5O, levied in 1877. But the
/ Democrat "dpfips the REPUBLICAN
to point ONT an instance where the
,,.,,.,,,, p,,,.,I h,, hoa,, I,, ,ooIoo..
- ,00"' i'''''' -" ''''' '"N' "07
luI or extravaganza. Again le' Us
examine the records-record evidence
! being the best-and we observe the
foIlowin~.
Taa,,;,4o,, oc.ou o,oatio.
iir. ,t,I
d we. T,'d !" "G we, to' '"9v p'S
| 800 uer annuIn. Mr.. q. 7. Fringer.
a Dpnorrat. fallv competpnt, was a.,
ambient for the posjtior at 5000 par
wear. Mr.. Merrill received the an
nointment. and i'm 1884 there was
| levied to him 800, and an order for
! 500 was drawn on the cOnting mt
! fund, and in 1885 he received IA levy
| of S40O in all 5000 for the work Mr..
/ Fringer proposed to do for $500.
> Rowan White WAS appointed
ianit0r 10 the Court House in January
/ 1884 at $50 ppr annum. Mr.. Whor-
rel Rpnublican. agreed fO do the
same work for Sl15 per wear.
. Tha ATTORNEYS to tho BOARD for
1893 and 1900 n1.t tho onnntv Gnr
thn-a vn.rs &25 The nroCnnt Ronrd
a,,,niHtnd r, = U,n,iII ~ 49, -,
,,ttnrmn,, =, oall,, mf SI5n nl e"
,,,id ,,,,t ~ ;,,ont f,,,,d 1 ,,,
"'Ic a. y" n',,,imwnd p ~ Snnhr "'','
,,, ii Xiv, fpa' ~ 1,oo nI-o nmt %,
~ nl-,ti,,,rnnt r,ni ,,,,J,i,,n. coz0 s,r
toSt. and aiso 'nii Son 70 n th3T ~. ~
]