The Portland daily press., 1885-11-12
LINCOLN COUNTY S. ). COURT.
BEFORE JUDGE DANFoRTH.
Especially Reported for the PRESS. !

WIsCAssET, Nov 10.
MONDAY Inhabitants Of Nobleboro VS.. in
habitants of Wiscasset. Action for pauper sup
ply. The plaintiff town presented bill OF $40 as
the amount due said town for the support of VIM.
said Barter always alluded to Wscasset as his
home; he having lived there for years with his
parents, and whenever he. had occasion to return
to WiScasset from out of town, he spoke of going
home. The defendant town refused to recognize
the validity of the BILL claiming that although
said Barter had lived in Wiscasset up to the time
of his becoming Of age, he subsequently went to
another town, and that WiScasset was no longer
his home. They claim that said Barter lived in
Jefferson for five consecutive years. The teSti-
mony was all out by 4 O'Clock this afternoon. The
arguments will be heard tomorrow morning.
Gilbert & Hilton for Nobleboro
Folger & Sawyer for Wiscasset.
State VS.. Thomas Sullivan, common seller. De-
murrer and exceptions fled Goes to Law Cou r t
Bliss, Jr., for defendant aos
The inhabitants of Nobeboro VS.. Inhabitants ol
Wiscasset Action for pauper supply. The argu-
charge to the Jury one hour. The jury retire to
their room and did not reach a decision until
about O'Clock this afternoon, which was in favor
of defendant town. This closes an interesting
case which has been before the court since last
Thursday
FOlger & Sawyer for Wiscasset
The Rockland Water Company vs. Camden and
naQ m bp aeT 0r
from using a blow-off near Toman's Pond, the
first named company claiming that the water COM
ing from the blow-oh is drained into the stream
leading from Tolman's Pond to the Mill Pond and
that when the force pump is used the alleged inn
purities from the blowof are forced into the main
pipe for consumers.
WEDNESDAY
In the case of Rockland Water Company VS..
Camden and Rockland Water Company, the Judge
declined granting an injunction as the defendants
Pond stream, closed, and will not make use of it
to prove detrimental to the interests of said
plaintiff
Robinson for plaintiff.
Lttlefeld for defendant.
In the case of the inhabitants of Nobleboro VS.
inhabitants OF Wiscasset, action for pauper sup
port the plaintiffs file exceptions. and the motion
to set aside the verdict The case goes before the
Gilbert s. Hilton for Nobleboro
Folger Sawyer for Wiscasset.
Divorces Decreed.
Eliza J. Philbrick VS.. Hannibal F. Philbrick.
Cruelty and desertion.
Bliss, Jr for libellant
Emma L. Bruce vs. Royal T. Bruce. Abuse and
desertiOn.
R. S. Partridge for libellant.
Cora K. Weeks VS.. Frank Weeks. Extreme
cruelty. Divorce decreed. Custody of children
Hilton & Huston for libellant.
Nellie j. Sidelinger VS.. Webster HI. Sidelinger
Adultery: Divorce decreed. Custody of children
Hilton s. Huston for libellant
Martha J; Cloudy vs. Thomas II, Holden and
others suit ON bastardy bond. Tried by the
court. Judgment Tor plalntlf
Hilton g. Huston for plaintiff
Pike for defendant.
Elzina Bracket vs. Thomas E. Mcfarland
Bastardy suit Dismissed.
Pike for plaintiff
Hilton & Huston for defendant.
Lucinda A. Seayey VS.. M. P. Seavey Divorce
decreed. ;and custody of two children given to
libellant.
c. H. Fisher for libelant
Case IN Equity.
Joseph Seavey VS.. Henry Ingalls, administra-
tor. de bO1lis estate 0f al In
seek relief for payment of note alleged to have
wrongfully been takenup Defence claim statute of
limitations and also payment, producing in court
receipt from Seavey. Decision reserved.
Sawyer for Seavey.
ingalls,, pro se
The November term of the Supreme Judicial
Court came to close this noon. 1t has been I'M
usually long, owing perhaps to the very bad
travelling which caused considerable delay in get
ting important witnesses.