Peninsula enterprise. [volume] (Accomac, Va.) 1881-1965, 1885-05-30

| FIIStltld. LII ID HUN ICdllS lOI NC
livery.
ORRIS 4. BROWNE,
Accomac G H., Va.
CAPT. O. a. BRowNE-Dea Sir
I used halfa ton of your Cedar Island
Guano" last year on Corn and can say
that it doubled my crop in corn and fod-
der, and my neighbors and all others
who passed the field can testify to it,
1t was on very poor land. think it
paid me well-woulu like to use two or
three tons this year. Very Truly Yours,
George S, Mapp.
Bobtown, January, 90, 1883,
fused Cedar Island Guano on Sweet
potatoes, and am perfectly well salts
fled with the result, | also used it on
Onions and other vegetables with the
hest result w. j. Fosque.
Sturgis Z. o.
MIR. BRowNE:-I tried your Cedar Is
land Guanolast Spring on Sweet Pota-
toes. alongside of other fertilizers, and
think it nearly doubled in yield of any
other used. In fact, if had moi used it
at all, my potatoes would not have been
worth digging. John j. Ward,
Hadlock, january, %, 1855.
CAPT. o. a. Brow NE;-DEAR SIR:
fused half a bag of your Cedar Island
Guano last year OH Sweet Potatoes, and
can truly say it eXcelS any fertilizer |
ever used. If had used it more extern
sively l am confident it would have
doubled my crop, Will try again next
season, II. G. Johnson,
Willis Wharf, January, 29,lSS5,
I used Cedar Island Guano on Sweet
Irish it was fully HepluG"t8 efnvtln
Guano, and better than any other fertil-
izers. On the Sweets and Corn it was
equal to any fertilizer l have ever used
Accomac G. II. Va. Thos. BeaSley,
I used Cedar Island Guano on Irish
Potatoes, next to Peruvian guano, there
was no difference in the yield Of either.
am of the opinion that with time Ce-
dar Island will yield more. | also put
it on Sweet Potatoes, and the results
were satisfactory, its yield was one
third more than where put no guano.
Drummondtown, WIN. w. CoXton.
I used Cedar Island Guano on Peas
bv the side Of Peruvian Guano, your
cIano excelled the Peruvian by far, and
on Irish Potatoes my experience is they
grow longer and yield more; L mean by
Growing longer, that the vines do not
Five up so early and outyied the PERU
Wan. | also applied it to Corn. only about
handful to every three or four hills
with very good results. A. L. James,
Locusteille, December, 10, 1854.
/ used your guano last year side Peru
Wan guano and other commercial man
ures, on Irish and Sweet Potatoes, the
Cedar Island was equal to any. l prefer
it. for the quality is up to any, and it
costs less money. w. r. Bunting.
Folly Greek, near Drummondtowll, jan
uary, 8, 1855.
used one-half ton of Cedar Island
Guano on Irish Potatoes side by side
with Peruvian guano that cost $50 per
ton of ) 600 pounds and other CONNER
cial fertilizers, that on which Cedar Is
land was used was bette than Peruvian,
ard there was no comparison With the
other fertilizers. Of course, the long
drought and bugs prevented full crop
! from maturing. z. G. Parkes.
Matomkin, z. o.
! used Cedar Island Guano Oh Irish
Potatoes with Peruvian Guano, and l
believe it to be equal to the Peruvian,
| also used it on Sweets; and the result
was excellent, l ann going to uselt again
E, NJ. Savage.
Bells Neck. October, 9, 1884
fused Cedar Island Guano on Sweet
and Irish Potatoes with other fertiliz.
ers. and on Sweets I had better results
than any other, and fully as good or
Irish. am going to use it again next
wear Z. w. Kellam.
Sturgis, October, 9, 1884.
fused the Cedar Island Guano on Irisl
Potatoes Notwithstanding the drouth
realized at rate Of 40 barrels from ONT
barrel of seed by the use of 5000 pounds
of guano per barrel of seed. ! think i
! the cheapest and best fertilizer in TIN
market. L shall continue to use it in thu
future. Edwin I, Parks
!, Leemont, Va, October, %, 1854,
l used your Guano last spring on 1risl
potatoes side by side with Peruvian
Guano and yours eXcelled it by one TIL"
. and was green while the others drled al
N, oSt-nnt from the long drOuClt.