The Eaton Democrat. (Eaton, Ohio) 1875-1903, 1885-09-10
LORD NAPIER.
How a Great Military History was Con-
ceived and Written.

How a Great Military History was Con-
ceived and Written.
One day early in 1928 he went for a
walk with Lord Langdale, one of his
intimate friends, owe some fields which
are now covered by the mansions of
Belgravia. The conversation turned on
Southey's recently published narrative
of the Peninsular Lord Langdale
was greatly struck by Napier's remarks
on the events of the struggle and the
characters of the principal actors. Sud-
denly he asked him what he was think
ing of doing. 'Do you mean," replied
Napier, ''where am I going to dine?"
NO." said Lord Langdale; ''what are
you thinking of turning to as an occu-
pationP" Then he urged him to turn
to literature. The article on Jomini
proved hat he could write. He must
not waste his life in mere amusement.
Why should he not write a history OF
the war himself? On returning home
Napier told his wife what Lord Lang
dale had said, and added that
he himself felt doubtful wheth-
or he was clever enough to
write properly such a book as a history
of the war. But she, believing firmly
in her husband, encouraged him to try.
For several nights he lay awake think
ing over the matter. At last his scru-
Piles were overcome by the thought that
he might be able at least to indicate
the illuminated memory of Moore, and
he resolved to make the attempt.
Those of his acquaintance who did not
really know him We're surprised to hear
of his intention, and remarked that
being a comparatively young man, he
was presumptuous to think that he
could write such a history. Having
formed his resolve he lost no time in
proceeding to execute it. First of all,
he called upon the Duke of Wellington
and asked him for the loan of his
papers. The Duke replied that he had
himself thought of writing a plain,
didactic history of the war, which
should be published after his death.
Till then it would be impossible to make
known the whole truth without giving
pain to many worthy officers, whose
only fault had been dizziness. For
these reasons he told Napier that he
could not lend him his private papers;
| but he intrusted him with a number of
important documents, and gave him au-
| thority to obtain from the Quartermas-
ter-General. Sir George Murray, all his
| orders of movements. Of his own ac-
| cord he promised to answer any ques-
| lions as to matters of fact which Napier
| might wish to ask him in the course Of
| his work. Murray, however, refused to
| let Napier have the orders of movs-
ments, stating that he reserved them for
| a history which he himself intended to
write. After taking these preliminary
| steps Napier went to Paris to collect
materials for the French side. He
walked about the streets. exploring the
| contents of the bookstalls. and bought
| every book that seemed likely to be of
| any use to him. He also went regular
~ to the Depot de la Guerre and made
| copious extracts from the documents
| which were stored on its shelves. On
returning to England he took up his
| abode for a time at Strathfieldsaye for
The purpose of consulting the Duke.
| Marshal Soult. with whom when in Paris
he had struck up an acquaintance, lent
him valuable papers; he correspondent
with Marshal Jourdan, and received in
formation from officers who had served
On the staff of Ney and Massena. He
also collected an immense mass OF let
tors and journals from British officers.
National Review,