The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1885-06-17

The plaiasiH lrirgs her action eff eiectnepl
% recover pcSSslsSsoa cG Firstly, 4 parcel q
land situated ea Eczt street, haliu) Homo
lulu, beng lard ccuveyed by kaU,ehaDeha "
= gas keoui Ii4ikulaui, BY deed dated August
i2.b, lSs2s sB,s BY hsoai LisikUlaui conveyed
C plsiuu8. By deed dated The sth Ct October,
1872.
The Court below, Mr.. Justice Austin, jury
being waived, held that plaintiff could ue.
take iadgusens for tbs parcel as 10 original
TILE II ktmeh1meha ~ was shown To his
nc exception was taken by plaintiff aud we are
uos % consider Il further.
The ecuplaiss also Claims (secCn1ly) par
Gel Of llud also situate .. H1liu, Honolulu,
bei1g part q Tie land described n Royal Pa
tsas 1ambec 45tT, Land Commission award
$50 Gated Nay -, 1852. &c LiGSulani Tie
plaintiff claims this Parcel under the deed
above uenCicGed, q keoni Ll1iSullai to her,
3. rp. 4Qs and 4g7.
The Court below gave judgment to plaintiff
for tbs parcel.
TIE btll ct exceptions raises, RESt, the ques-
t1cu Bheshsr-uo entry or possession OF this
Land By the plaintiff or her predecessor or An
cssscr, being SAown-ths plaintiff has right
4-a-A 4AAi4-- Same -AA--a-A-A'A
actions enacted II 1910
We 90 not shiak that the statute bears the
construction put upon II BY the counsel fer
defendant. that, IN order e sn.igls , person to
recover IN ejeesmeuE be mus show IN addition
C lis nile IN fee staple that lie has been in
Icr11I possession Of the land within twenty
years.
1T Is 4 familiar rule Of law thu. there can
&c bgs Cne scszll seizi1 Of AZ estate, that pos
session f,iicEs the title IN the absence Of any
pcssessl1H adverse to IL, and is j result Of
these sEg principles, that the rigttful owner
Of and Is deemed to have the possession until
be 5 c1stsd from It or 6isselzsd, and also, II
the abssEcs Of LIMITATIONS, that be l. restored
70 PcsSessicu when the hostile possession OF
tlsseizil ceases. Want Ct possession, there
fore, II the true owner implies 1gscsr Ct him
BY another through N entry and hostile pos
session
~Hsnce- the Ultimate test Of the want Of res
session ct the true 5wHer, AMI bis neglect 20
assert his n yhs to the possession, upoH which
the sel1l-es CT Limitation rest, Is the existence
Ct N diverse possession gf another denying
the owners right.
Sedgwicz lad W1i5. ssTriaI Of Title to
Land, Sec rs
The true CWuer being IL possession by
force Of his title, be 80 remains until fisseized
CT oGsssc b.F scms Q1s who enters With clam
CT adverse possession When this custer takes
Place, the Imitation Of the stItats begins to
run Bearing IN mind At the outset that the
chest CT the sEa-T1s Is % catCff and defeat the
claim CT the true owner We arrive At the gen
sraI principle that the crItsrl1u gf the time
when TIE seazIts Legfns % run, u the 1Gstzr
Ct the true GEuer Ilf his cunse,i 1euE ri-1. 70
&c rei1sti1si n the Fcssessicl- and -lat Il Il
net N theory the snlryof the adverse claimant
To determine, them the character and sui
cIgncy Ct N entry az the f1G1dIsICu CT N I'd
verse Vcssessigu- We inquire whsther It Is SUI
icIsns % ccustltlss an custer Qf the one en-
G-Is,i t1 the possession Il sec 80
We quite tins largely frrm the sbCVs work
Is expressing cur ufaaz fully
Il Is u be aoe1sei thaE cur statute l. very
similar &c chcse Gf the New England Slases,
ssilsEiHg very closely that Of Massachusetts,,
AMI IN urne Of them Is there any FruFisi11 az
Q, wdaz shall be deemed an adverse possession
sufficient &c car a SUE CT entry
-1Ehe stI1lEs VIII nat commence % r,Il Until
= Cause ct lcEi1H has arisen Ii fIvCr CT the
person having the II --fIl -Itls- n ether verbs
lutH be has nesn disssizEd 1F the gerzon n
pCsssssi1n, CT those n prIyity with him IN the
pCsEgsE5gu-
Weed 3 Lin Actinls, Sec 95s
We &c 1at think fE incumbent uguu the
plaintiff t. snow rias she or ler ancestors have
1een n PossessiGH CT the and within twenty
ysars, If she shGws tisis u the sams and 10
adverse possession Ii proved L 4 theref1rs
UNNECESSARY -l iisEusH tie question whather
csrraiH accounts II the 1rgbals CGgfs are e7i-
Gsnce gf admission b. defsni1aE's ancastlr gf
g Z
5ei1alf az kecnI LlIilfuI11I- The tificlItT
viii the Vrgof sahmiEtsif appears u be that L
does 1Ge IpFear trum whaE specific land the
rents we're cgliectstf
Bdt iE IL further cun1andsG tiIlE the rsrtr-is
CT Tie Court IdilCed 81 plaintiff are net cna-
e IsIVe zIfiier IN her fIFur or lr1inat the fs-
fsnfanE
In ISIS. IeErzrz sf administration vera
zrHldzd T. kIaiIwa q and M1lIiaf w On
lie estate Of Lilllsuianf- Mahiaf vas Lailsu
aHF iisfar. and she By EaaisrW9, bad / son.
AaawIIi4 tsrrgneausiF Prinhssi EaahiI whg a
iefsnGaHG's -rlHr1r
In E-1L, klaisIva. Surviving administering
q lie estate CT LialzHIani AMI ralriian CT
.;'snr klailiIiani- vas summoned Gu the pc
1ilnu gf sait hsunI- Chen % years cfd @ lie
lIs l;-uuHfs. IL int 80. ant the same Esrs
ii1'Feii By the pr1naie Court Eaaiaga tIeu
lsi1tsnei fer has 1isEii.sr, and that she urup-
srtF ml-ilE BE- Distributed % the htirs Pun
icaiiGH al made If ne lme II hearing, aud
lruafs -Ilfzn- The 9ruhaEz 7Il-a deerasff that
4 asnI LialisIIlauI WIS the 5Gn and heir Is law
Il LIal.EIiIni- EIdWIli sunrsafai the claim IT
al lslIiI1Is ami appealed q a my, claiming
lac AsruI LiaIEIiauI vas llssifinlars. All.
-iaG be- az ngpheW Of LiaIEIIani- WIS the
ielr sf laE- The VIry 6luu,i By tlieir Vsr,iiGr
2; lIT1r gf haaNiiIis ana md s1nenG vas snhargsf
lierzun- EIE ale Cggrr Eranfsd a new rrial
The case II rspgrrszi IN lawn $50
gen a szs-uur lr1Gi au tie same isHue. Tie
IsIiics Of he IIry vas IA Elv1r af Esnui Lfai-
Iliam- anr 10 IFItrnenE Wis snharsh auan
liaf F=rTilrr- EXCEPTIONS were aiken huE Esrs [
isizr'Earfa Withdrawn By EiIe Guanasi s1r Easa-
Vlliii- L h sislimesi BY fefsslriaars .anaaei I
here n ~ Judgment N EIEur of EsnnI Lf.ilz1I I
lsIis amt Eiiat halEiliI II net sziapped By tie 4
-sriicr
": riiiui5 tias al the law rnzi5sa It the ,.is.rfs
ny "a enrar up Judgment On Flll7iier f1nl,sss
sr-i-liH lalnisf FrIcEafiiurE azz raEgnY tae
nlrr nlHe uuw rss-Ird sIEh entry Is having
ean MADE, amt may arTtsr Il 70 be made astll.
~ ar4c-
Sse Tgslas-i8 =. E.-rrrs- 4 E..Vzr s;,5
We arz aware EiaE X WIS he 1rzrrirs AZ
~ -- ~ '-i.---t 4tA--- --t-4lA1 AlNAtlalAal
nr ~ t1sa alme far them afrsu afssr rIi,s
eiIrr lad IltlHHraet inr tie azrn and ,-zner-
y when s-lcErrgna Ezrs tzssn- rta INDY
Enl vas luc snrsrsi ami tie .1la wa sIlsl.Iu
apnAlsit a. EzzapGnns hazilsr seen tslIsz
iliis ssi;ana Fsl7tlcf, entry AZ Judgment Wa
lalgnuiif ailIi pr1daliy- iIrg1rfsn 81 the clerk
Ina principle lIaE -tiie zlfiInfsl.lfiuu at A
IeSfiHn a geiiIs7ss VII be binding. ant auiy
t-iH Pr1reaiiingE n wE;En iiey take rils.a. Z
q n every afiissr wiii-s tina same ,'Iaafi,Ir
asElllfl'is E-za assrias. N Essli1 a. E.1ss1.
lls'v' . aias ana has EiuEa -fsaH rspsasssily I
1rued
4 rHula aat be EsrinHIlF -lnle1lil.sf sdaL Il
i.1's.ar and ass.I sHisns'i ca lis ss.sauli seq