New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1885-09-30

,,oarip0 IN a controversy between
:. 49, 49, ,.orations on behalf OF one 0i 'N' ,,l,,.
49,, - say The only explanation thAo ,'.,e, -,
80 ~, ,tve,i was that the Unled St"'e - ,,,,e
- osaee suit stood practically Ior 'no
fhe iennesSo. rvals fine Bell Company ms was
A' W ,na tone of tho speeches made by 'lie
"es ',S cloctrle The Government SUIT la -
- oLen OF as their own proeeeu'hs- ad
We !. qF,ev ha 20 now brought another Sdis, $50.
- ,a.ve OF the Accomplishment Oh tho -,
,.,,av the money Of tho Uniteu States ~ -, en-
10 s"i1os , tho American Bell Telephone Company ~
81 where the Bell Company is not an inh'''
ant aud never was ETC. -, .,,o pon.T Electric
rha.a w az no denial by the couhsei Vi ''o 80, 10
.s, tho limited states suit was ihSti'u'ou :" 80,
'a ~, the contrary United states Dls'ric'-H'o
s'" ~ .neakIng on behalf of the Pan-E'ee'IiV,
-. :. rn,s proceeding in TENNESSEE, SO iar as inc IN
,ri,ed STATES is concerned Is OF course pfooeo"
tnc "a far as I know of, which Is rare
:, s,nnld think So" said Mr.. Dickersoh' g.
.I, must be treated, however" continuou wi -
A., :. "a entitled to absolute bona nae
49, thinks IL strange that the Attorney
- Irrited states who he admits bas authorizes ~,
VI 'uo and the money of the United States on Dill
,~h,ch he says contains so many allegations wii."
s,.nosad of in other cases but sueh Is inc i"0-
Now the very strangeness oil the proeeous I'm,
80 the legal bona fdes that court must give W O'.
ehs 'ne '0s o,a,og II does strike me that
Of the 9nl UNI 1nroessdng is fled set aside the paen
nnless so ne act of the United states and as long Us
mai h peuding in that way to declare tns ainst
sna rs on g6t not exercise Its discretion ,i
NE ade usiness and grant preliminary lJinc
'' rims the Pan Electric Company, a .P,pnay
an court by a United states esse as
,t ~ use the United states suit In Iennessee d"
s Of STAYING of the hearing of the motion iOr h
sse ion sLed for against them III olheI ~
Iarai suit aupears have been instituted WIN .no
rnose of using II just that way to prevent suit
Ip nv the Bell Company while the tennessee sun
s slow length along in the courts III 'na'
State ~ s,o.smants OF the counsel
80" ,ha pan Electric Company IN the bat 1 40
"a that they had been spendlng lucn tlT ~
onSns papers ana evidence to be used IN PnhS
r. Temnessee against the Bell Company Jnage Duly
INA ,ht N seemed very strange that parties snot t
wa hecn 40 active in another case AGAINST lls .s
and should not ready in the defence mere Wi we
ann,t . General Johnson aferwaId salu Mhiie a.
49, ,,ranorinO the case in Tennessee my pr0thet
sWby conldn't we prepare case here Juus -; asE
remarkrd that that very proper question: W AT
eneri Johnsons response was that the cour Va hegore
eomired Jurisdiction should be allowed 10 go OF th
anaher court would be allowed TO- Inc eounse the
thus we'd their strong preferences o o
sraanesses eourts and also that they were uIect9
tsresfed in the result of the United states st
rnssee Even N they did not succeed there III r
ba Reil patent set they hoped TO use TINS &
ment litigation In Tennessee 10 oDSllu0' 'N0 w. -
caedngs AGAINST them elsewnefe'