The Indianapolis sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1880-1904, 1885-03-20
COURTHOUSE LOCALS.
John Eusey sues for Divorce From
Mary z. Rusey-Mary Duffey's
Claim Against the Receiver
OF Hsrrison's Bank
Notes.


for petit larceny by Jud &c Norton yesterday.
The damage suit Of Robert L. Worrell VS..
The /. and st. L. Road, was yesterday dis-
missed in Room ?.
Fred Boettchsr has fled suit against Hugh
Goudy, to replevy horse and wagon valued
AZ 500. Demsud Is made for 500 for IN.
lawful detention.
New tris ma been refused by Judge Han
ra in the suit OF Nettie Young VS.. The Cent?
mental Life Insurance Company. and juig-
mept given the plaintiff fer 81 or.
Louisa Grtan has been given Judgment
against Charles Girton for Sl4s, new ia
having been refused by Judge Howe. Tois
was the suit to recover the value OF a hack.
Fannie Lee was put on trial yesterday in
the Criminal CoGrt for petit larceny. she is
the c0lored woman charged with the theft of
tubs from party on Massachusetts avenue.
The trial o. May NJ. Eaton VS.. the c., H.
and I. Road, for 81 600 damages, was put on
trial before jury in Room l yesterday.
Plaintiff sues to recover damages for being
put oil q train some two or three years ago.
The case has been on the docket for q long
time.
The Auditor desires to call the attention
of all persons having deeds to real estate to
the necessity of having In, ir deeds record al
on or before the last day of March, to have
the property appear in their names for the
eneuing year. The transfer book will close
March 81.
Mary s. Denker asks for a divorce from
Christian Denker. They were married in
August, 1888. she charges defendant with
cruelty treating her, threatening to cut hsr
throat and kill her. On the 81 of January
last he assaulted her with q hammer aud
home for protection. Defendant is q non
resident and was last heard from in Cinciu-
natl.
The suit of James II. Pritchard VS.. Laura
Sprsgue is on trial before iury in Room
,. Plaintiff is suing for 500 attorneys
fees, for services rendered. He alleges thst
be acted as attorney in some transactions in
volving the collection of assigned accounts,
judgments, etc, and the title TO real estate
sold by the. Sheriff This was continued for
four wears, az the services have never been
paid for.
In the suit OF the State ex rel. vs the
Board OF Commissioners OF Washington
County the Supreme Court yesterday ruled
that where the State becomes suitor it is as
much bound by the laws OF the land, by the
rules of pleading and by decisions and judy
ments OF courts, inferior or superior as any
other suitor. In this case the result Ia that
the Attorney General must pay the costs of
course, having recourse against the State for
reimbursement
John Eusey yesterday filed suit for divorce
from Mary Elizabeth Eusey. They were
married in November, 1873. John charges
that his wife has neglected her household
iDg Der children alone. The children
are so email that they need sps-
cial care. and on one occasion
when she so left them they set fire TO the
house and came near burning it down. He
also carged her with adultery with Louis
Schaffner, who was arrested at plaintiff in
stance last Saturday night on a charge of
trespass. Plaintiff ASKS for the custody of
the children. Re is an engineer by trade,
and lives at 40 Br0okside avenue.
The intervening petition of Julia Dufey,
in the HayrIson's Bank receivership, was
heard yesterday by Judge Walker and taken
under sdvisement. Plaintiffs petition showed
that she had leaned 81 O00 to the Harrisons,
to be invested for her in real estate. This
was done, and sevsral arrangements
sultiug in transfers of the prop.
erty because OF unproductiveness. A
final arrangement was made, and pending
The investment of the money the bank went
INTO the hand Of a receiver. Plaintiff seeks
70 recover her money with interest, claiming
il was not part OF the banks funds. She
soldiers widow, drawing a pension, aud
. living somewhere in one of the Western
States.
Thomas W. Bullitt, OF Louisville, Ky, has
begun suit in the Federal Court for the
Southwestern Contract and Construction
Company against the city of New Albany for
an injunction against the municipal officers
OF the city TO keep them from interfering
with the delivery Of bonds amounting to
S250,co0 to the plaintiff, to whom they had
been assigned by the company, which is
buildin,' the bridge across the Ohio between
Louisville and New Albany. The latter city
guaranteed the payment OF the bonds in
1881, and they were placed in the hands Of
John A. Butler and W. c. DePauw, who
were to turn them over as the work pro.
crossed. a few weeks ago the Common
Council, by resolution directed the trustees
not to turn over the bonds, thus indicating
that payment will be contested on the
erourds of alleged irregularity in making
the guarantee, and the present proceedings
are 10 prevent any interference OF this kind.
Speaker Jewett represents the city of New
Albany, and will probably demur to the
complaint, alleging want of jurisdiction.
Local Courts.