Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1885-11-06
THE HIGHER COURTS.
Yesterdays Rulings In the Supreme and
Appellate Courts AT Tyler.

Yesterdays Rulings In the Supreme and
Appellate Courts AT Tyler.
Special 10 the Gazette.
TYLER, TEX, Nov. 5.-ln the supreme
court yesterday motions to dismiss were
entered in the cases Of lIutchison ct al.
VS.. Mcagell ct al, from Navarro county.
The Houston & Texas Central VS.. NAL
10y, from Navarro county.
Crockett VS. John ID. Templcton, from
Navarro county.
Submitted on briefs for appellee; Clark
VS., Nelson, from Nacogdoches county.
j. & w. Buchanan VS. Belgcr, from Ma
rion county.
In the court of appeals the following
orders were made to-day; Affirmed, Rag
land VS.. FELTON,, from Upshur county.
Cakcr VS.. the State from Henderson
county.
Adams VS.. the State, from Maverick
county.
The Cult Colorado & Santa Fe Railway
VS.. Jones, from Johnson county.
Hopper ct al. VS.. Donald, from Brazos
county.
Wathrop vs.. Ice Company, from Bell
county.
Abrams vs.. the State, from Dallas
county.
Reversed and rendered: Waddngton
vs., the state, from Williamson county
Reversed and rcmandcd: Tcssip VS..
Hayes, from Wood county.
Wilbarger County VS. Bran, from Will
bargcr county.
Reversed and dismisscd Williams vs.
the State, Cadet VS.. the State, Raincy
vs.. the State, Johnson vs.. the State,
Bentley VIZ. the State, all from Cooke
county.
Wheeler VS. Davis, from Mitchell
county.
Bud English vs.. the State, from Hunt
county.
Johnson VS.. the State, from Kaufman
county.
wilkins VS.. Ward, from Hunt county.
Motion to dismiss submitted:
English vs.. the State from Hunt county.
Johnson VS.. the State, from kaufman
county.
Sowal VS.. the State. from Navarro
county.
Submitted on briefs and documents
from both parties,
county.
Jackson vs.. the State, from Kaufman
county.
Lloyd vs., the State, from Kaufman
county.
Submitted on briefs for both parties:
Rex VS. the State, from Hunt county.
Lance VS. the State, from Hunt county.
McGrcw vs.. the State, from Hunt
county.
Walker vs.. the State, from Hopkins
county.
Grisson VS. the State, from Hunt
county.
Anderson ct al. VS. the State, from Ma
varro county.
Williams w, the State, from Navarro
county. s%iN s,Sesag5 q az g ,sJsYp.
Overstrect vs.. Patty, from Hunt county
Lattcram VS.. the State, from Hunt
county.
reculand vs., Jardcan, from Hopkins
county.
Lapicr vs.. Limestone, OK partc Linn,
from Milan county.
Submitted on briefs for appellant:
RsGG.IrX[as 1Poci4e Railway VS. Wolch,
/ The TeNas& Pacific Railway VS.. Mid.
| ford, from Red River county
/ The Texas 4 Pacific Railway VS.. Jack.
/ son, from Red River county,
/ Mistral VS. on Company, from Navarro
county.
Western Union Telegraph Company VS..
smith Co., from Hopkins county.
Mallory vs.. Bond, from Kaufman
county.
/ In supreme court to-day motions to dis,
miss were ovcrrucd IN the following
cases: Hutchinson ct al. VS. Mesal, from
/ Navarro county.
| The Houston & Texas Central Railway
vs., Mallory, from Navarro county.
Racket vs. Templcton, from Navarro
| county.
/ submitted ON briefs for both parties:
Jones vs. Powers, from Kaufman
/ county
Crabtrec vs., Whitesel, from Navarro
county,
Crockett vs. Tcmplcton, from Navarro
county.
tIayes VS.. Rogers, from Navarro
county
Submitted on briefs for appellant
Johnson vs.. Johnson, from Hopkins
county.
Osborne vs., Nash, from kaufman
county,
Whitehead vs., Fisher from Navarro
county.