Daily Republican., 1885-11-27
tIF I A E01
This nornir-

oeus A~convened AZ
morning with the On.
Associates Woottep s sss
he bench. The nam 10
panel OF Jurors wsrs :. \
Cochran, after which ~
Valentine vs.. Joseph % -
!! and the opepia,
The plaintiff made 10 nv
drew u. Ssnborn, Eco w
He commended that N.
had been most outrsp.au
BY DR., Tantum, and ~,
aud Mrs. Valentine on ma =.
years, toiling and slsvi ~
for his benefit. and tba. !,
them for It was the littI.
. few worn ont cas-, II, =.
Mrs. Tantum gave 10 NJ
Then, when they had %.
ont OF them, he took a n,
belonging 70 them, and
ont without . home, WIN
60, or any means Of sunns
Of winter.
He claimed that |, wa,
that Mr. Valentine eve, |,
tsnts Of the agreemsn, IN
duced In Court with his
tached, and said ~
In his right senses womb
paper, binding himself
work for such o pittapes
lated. He spoke abou; n
and closed by making AN
TO the jury to render a "a,
OF his client, allow her 4
for her services, and III.
tween the amount Dr. ny
I ne goods and the amount
for them.
Harry Enmops. Fan
the opening argument " Y,
at 10. 80 O'Clock. He ~,
easy thing to institute H.,
and threaten and blps,s,
will be done II money |.
1t IL another thing vSsn
10 presented before A NJ,
men.
He did not wonder ina,
tines heart failed her WIZ
that DR.. Tantum iu,snds;
case taken to court, ~
try TO show that u, n
avaricious Shylock. bu,
known in this oommunl,,|
impression 10 prevail X
the claim ~ presented M
was allowed, II would M
tine about 81. 900 and Ia,
certainly entitled n a.
which was simply an out
for the services Rendered
It had been claimed Nv
for the plsintiffs that M
ignorant man. and did n
purport Of the apreemspt
signed, but this had no,
but II had been proved
shiftless. and not only
money but q considersbs
the doctor,
He COMMANDED that Il n
probable that Mrs. MI
know Of this agreement. h
It's provisions. for fin
fool, she is not,
Everything tended 10 4
| Valentine Was 10 have y
when she paid DIR, Tau,u1
he had paid for them, but
not pay him, he sold tbe |.
one else. which he had !
right 70 do.
"A strange feature Of III
| fact that the plaintiff ask,
| for work and labor, on ! 4
her own Testimony, syeryd
vlded by Doctor Taniun,
S3 n week additional foi
| raised by her on that farm
| was furniabed the doctor.
Mr.. Emmons rad IN
| entered into betvsr d..
IIaaae E. Valeutiu, il 1
ali the stock and plud
1.-The farm was 70 b ,he vi
lTaptum. and tina. Vailed
Ieven privileged TO eel or
| any wav withou, vhtta
from Inc Doctor.
In this aareemen. d.
Ito nav them 800 a year,
THAT he was losing money
1.-The amout for the succeed
IS50 a wear.
The agreement also shoi
ITantnm had the poxer,
to mt them off the place
Icsss Of law or notice, aud
mo circamstance were thsl
adhered a. tenants bu.
lvanis MI. EmmoBs n
vas but an exemplihcaiid
storv ~ tha countryman 1
A. soon ss the ssrpen. |
Iinto life IL tried to sting I
land his cbilirep. and sOi5
.Iinstance. DR.. Tantuu hsi|
friendl The valentines 4
latter he had assisted thsr|
lin his mower they turned
Ito stinr him. and nov ID
Ia AZ that he NAV still ID
tbe,r victim and placed d
III nitiless nd ventures,
nr Tautnm has lived !
.Iknovn tco well In this .
u ha red hy these peOE
Emmons CONCLUDED bis v
!. mani at 10 O'clock, and VI
No I' =, - vbo made tho
ms s t Tor the defendant,
Il M Lore commenced B
.VHDr Tsntnm was guilt!
. neanle claim. he Is diesel
u If tar and feathers, bu'
al Suiitv and he did not b
eua ybo had heard the Q
nj wss This suit was enter
r.I,ss0 Int he cause was
!. - toe eo,s III he "a a.torney for
lin INT them until July, Il
-Ih,iI ~ nartIculars, or in
y land ont What they were
!. IDr Tsntmm for.
81 No,r thev come into !