National Republican., 1885-10-20
THE COURT RECORD.

United States Supreme Court Several mo.
tions to advance cases for hearings were dis
posed Of the most important being In the Nir.
ginia coupon cases, six In number. All were
advanced, ana five Of thom were fNel for
hearing on the third Monday In November.
Tie petition Of X. II. Chanin (Chaiin W.. 1ny.
lOr, virginia coupon case, for summary pro.
s Scss 10 compel ohedi,ncc to The Judgment Of
NE court rendered last year, was denied
without inquriug as to its merits, for the
reason thnt atcr the mandate IN the case went
down to the circuit court of lIenrico county, a
trial was had that resulted In another iidg.
mcnt, which has been brought TO the Supreme
Court Tor review upon another writ Of error,
in ms case the court Will be called on TO dc.
tcrmine whether the mandate has been followed
ana If not to direct what should have been
done The PROCESS asked for by the petitioner
Is therefore unnecessary.
Michael Hanlcy ct nl., plaintiff In error VS..
Charles nonoghuG; motion to advance granted
and case assigned for argument nj foot of call
ON third Monday In November next ID. NJ.
Ferry & Co.. plaintiff in error, vs.. WIN. Living.
ston, jr,, collector, &c. William Livingston,
Jr, plaintiff in error, vs.. ID. VI. Ferry ~ Co.;
motion TO advance granted and cases assigned
for argument on third Monday In November
next, after No. DO Bernard Arnson ct al,
plaintiff in error, vs. Thomas Murphy, late col.
loctor &c; motion to advance granted and
case assigned for argument on third Monday in
pnrto VIM. l.. Royal (No. ~, appellant aud
plaintiff In error, Tx parc Win. l.. Royall
no. y, appellant ana plaintiff IN error. WIN.
u, SANDS, plaintiff IN error, vs. y. q.
Edmunds, treasurer, &c; motion to nd.
vance granted and cases assigned for
argument on third Monday of November next,
alter No SS7. william l.. Royal, plaintiff W
error vs. the state Of Virginia: motion TO ad.
vance granted and case assigned for argument
on third Monday In November next, aitcr No.
1909 II, II. Chafin plaintiff in error VS.. Will
lam Taylor: motion to advance granted and
case assigned for argument on third Monday In
November next, after No. 1910. Robert L.
Barry, plnintili in error, VS.. l.. q. Edmunds,
treasurer, &c.; motion 10 advance under thirty.
second rulc granted Henry G. Brown, appel.
liant. vs. james Il. Grant, &c, ct al; motion to
dismiss denied, j. w, Jefferson, trustee, ct al.
VS.. John II. Driver administrator, &c: motion
to advance under thiTty.sccond rule granted.
Pnttie A. Clay, plaintiii in error, VS.. David |.
Field, submitted pursuant to twentieth rule by
William J.. Nugcnt for plaintiff In error aud by
Frank Johnston and j. Il. McKcighan for dc.
icndant in error. The Cincinnati, New orleans
nnd Texas Pacific Railroad Company, plaintiff
in error, VS.. the commonwealth of Kentucky;
the Louisville aud Nashville Railroad Com
pany, plaintiff In error VS.. the commonwealth
of Kentucky, and the Chesapeake, Ohio and
Southwestern Railroad Company, plaintiff In
error, VS.. the commonwealth of Kentucky; ar.
gument continued by T. W. Hardin for the de.
iendant IN error aud concluded by William
Lindsay for plaintiffs in error. John Thom.
messen ot al, owners, &c, appellants, VS.. Mark
Whitewill; argument commenced by Z. Van
Snntvoord for appellants.