The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1885-09-08
FORT WORTH LOCAL NEWS
LIST OF CASES IN THE COURTS.
Detective woody's Murder Trial-The
killing and what Led to it-An
Effort TO Compromise the
NewspaperlWar-Pcrsonals
and Other Matters.

Fort WORTH, Sept. 7.-lSpoclal.l =
The regular fall term of the county
court commenced to-day, Judge Tur-
ner presiding. The docket this term
being unusually large the term OF the
court will very probably DO quite a
long one. The trial docket was called |
with the following result:
State w. A. Fulmer ct al, forfeiture |
of bond and final judgmedt by default.
State va. Henry Beard ct al, foriei-
ture OF bond and final Judgment by
default.
j. l., Wallace VS.. A. p. Higgins, &C.
count due; jury demanded by do
PENDANT.
Sam Finley VS.. Fort Worth Street
railway company, damages; jury de-
msuded by plaintiff.
Casey ~ Swasoy vs. Hickey Il Beh-
rens, debt; case dismissed at plaintiffs
cost.
George b. Cornelius va. j. Branch Il
Co.; jury demanded by plaintiil.
ID. Bowden VS.. Henry Tanner, debt;
iinal Judgment by default on note.
ID. Bowden vs.. East Texas Fire In
suranc0 company, garnlshee, Henry
TANNER, defendant; Judgment rem
oered against garnishee.
A. M. McKillen vs. A..P. and jose
phine Ryan; Sdismisssd.
State vs.. l. Mcconnell OF al; forfeit
ure OF bond ana final judgment.
State VS.. Bill Heirmen ct al; eame
order.
State Va, Bob Galloway OF al; same
order.
State VS. Joe Gribble OF al; same or
der.
State VS.. John Thomas ct al. same
order.
G. Il. Glenn VS.. Gulf, Colorado a.
Santa Fe railroad, damages; jury de-
msnded by defendant.
Charles Frank VS.. Missouri Pacific
railway company, damages; jury de-
,nandod by the plaintiff,
Casey " Swasey vs. j. r. Hickey ct
al; oase dismissed at plaintiffs cost.
u. w. Gillespie VI. Mamie Jones,
account; jury demanded by tho de-
fendant.
j. Il. Smith Va. w. Dunn, debt; jury
demanded by plaintiff,
j. M. Burney VS.. Fort Worth Street
Railway company, damages; Jury de-
" n R3rton on a,,,na;otron4 49,.
appravafed assault. entaraG nias ~
@niItv and be was fineJ S55 N''" Vi
Thsodnra C,irton wos thor r,t ~,
trial for stealing a Ict of bacdp, '' ,~ ~
this case occnnied the rom indar ~
the dsv VI
WV 49,
IN Disihiof COUNT
In the district clerks Office to-day
the following suits were tiled
Jss. McCreary ~ GO. VS.. j. j. Lauril,
an action OF debt for $l,0lS.2O worth
OF goods sold aud delivered.
5. A. Garyin vs.. j. ID. Wood, suit fol
partition OF W acros OF land In John
son county.
N. u. Daggetg Vs. u. NJ Brown. suit
Tor Siov ana 10 ioreclose vendors iien
on LOT Ia city,.
L. Ward OF. al. va. w. N. Riddle
Bnsr9ihn, sun ior @l,yiS oep,'
", d. Daggett e.. III, w. .. l.. Bole
et' ai', sun ior SoO ana ioreciosure OF
vendors lien on lot ia city.
DETEuTINEs DIFFICULTY.
mr; , "a, ~ Ec, WoCny; cniei uesecTyo on
.he uuii, Colorauo q SAINT re railway
leit tnis morning Tor meridian, III
bosque county, where nc stands IN
ulcteu Tor K,iilng ono Bass kDvanaugl
on tue loth OF Al srch, 1851. some time
pelore that aste the santa 10 passen-,
ger Trains hau oenn repeatedly stoned
heAr cersa,n loosiity IN bosqut
county, hhu Woody was engaged IN
leIIetins oui tne perpelrators OF this
crilno. ne learned that hayanaugt
was "ahteu III houston county foi
muruor, Wnom nc also suspected o.
no,ng aniohg tnose VINO hau stoned
VIC trains. atheu Win toe proper
g1p9rs, no anu ueputy snerlii named
Wits unuerloos 10 arrest kaVa-
haugn H., haavansugh resisted, and IN
.no u,nicuity shst ioilowou, was shot
nnu kiiieu. Whlto anu Woody were
iru.cteu ior we muruer. On chang'
" Senue, Wits Mas acquitted IL
y on, uuun'y' "oouy,s Trial IL se
'o' 'o''iiof'o"' ,, .Sn&
A RUMOR,