Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1885-10-27


nv PRISONERS IN Iol m
NhN YIN '''' -, rus AFTERNOON
pl>trlct A'IntneN Mar'lhe openeu ulr
VusG' nc saw warn nou peeh lnu'cleu
ior luIveuN' auu ne i,SyaGG 'oe statute Gov
er'hS Hle 'IIuv' Nnue uc ulstrlcl az
torhoy was speaNlhS' james w. flsh' Wlll'
nus CUSlouiaiI entered 'he COURTROOM
private ROOM Wh're me- renalneu ulth
wanted aS witness. lne dlstr'c' atlor-
ney sad
Naru on May o. leat IN thls Guy
presence y cncoN iof 9thouu 10 lh'
Marine DahN HraWna agalnst a checE lof
S.@Voo OK lhe tlrst NRuohal pahk'
Wald received tae money from t1e
Marlne oale; ne Sio'VVo ch'eE was
nov hoROr'u ny lhe hlrNt National, ahu
Nard was @Nllly OF grand larceny ny pro-
curing H,o'u'V ON VI from the Maflhc
nanh; Iu' Jury must remember ll"l
ware was not ON lFlal Ior running
ven NrahL ana Sehullg MN
nr'heh.h'arleu I'D 'a' grave or lor >ehu-
ing 10 'h' ,ltle prison lor zen years
gentleman hGh'} connected IN n"hNln@
circles Aut NnN ON tfal lofgiahu larceny.
James -. fish was t1e hrst witness
chliru' lr ivdNeo oNVr M nus
ghali ana glanced SaVaSelN al
Ward, VINO lowered ms eyes Nafd rs
couhscl lhoNtu lhal the Jury De as
missed, on account OF lhe statement OF
lhe ul'tt!eI attorney regarding "laub
ana w. Fi'o' ne motion! was denied
MI FlSh Na'0i ~ am slA'N-SlN years
oIu' convict ~ the AunuFn state prls-
on 10 Wnlch J was S'u'ebceu LOT zen
years, hI nara amor SAW lhe chccN
! liluVeu 10 me on Nay d. lsN' ~ was
Iauucu lnf uI th' paNloE telier' J
0liec,'u u Nei'lHeu' ulter went To the
ltiephuu' aHN rang up Nalu'
VutHu"h' we prisoner mere lht
Hovd you mean
ar, rlSl Leaning over AGAIN.
Woulu ilhe 10 sec MN oS' that Is me
man" ICohtenpluously)
continuing the witness SAID 81 said
over thc phone Nafu, nave
your cheek mere Tor certlllcauon Tor
l,6uO, against an Underlined chock Tor
Si0,oOo' ward phoned PACK That 1t was
an right ana certlheu' saw ward ON
May o. about y O'Clock lie came IN Mon.
day morning before business hours aud
asked lor the WltildilWnl OF certlled
@ol,OuO Ileck, because an SeIuOo,
against when the former sum was drawn,
hau Decn MithuraWh' Mr. Johh H. Carr,
the receiving teller, was present, ana
instructed MN 10 Wl'huraW thc check.
men INC exchanges came IA found That
the Soo'ooo cneck Wilch ward SAID was
wllhdraWn, was presented ana PAID
by the bank rang Ward up
ana told HIM. lie said IL was
arrange. but that IL would be all right.
lie was too busy to come TO see me
then"
On cross-eNamlnatlon the witness said
he ala not know That Wards account had
been oyerdrawn on May o. 1889, TO the
amount OF 100000, 81 knew That Ward I
often had his general account oyerdrawn,
but ward told me the money was depos- /
tied to the Grant ward account ON
April u, 1881, told ward That IL seemed /
to me now annirs were drifting IN a way
! could not understand Mr. Carr the I
second teller had charge ol the cash nc
count. ON May ! expected Ward /
all day, according TO his written
promise TO make deposit 10
relieve the ISL, 900 check which did come
IN, though he assured me that II was
withdrawn We waited Tor Ward at the
bank all that day untll o'clock Ward
had promised 10 raise the money, and n
understood that he was trying TO borrow
II on The 9TH Of May. was pressing him