Roseburg review. [volume] (Roseburg, Or.) 1885-1920, 1885-05-01
COURT DOCKET.

yeyance.
VIM L. Wilson vs. O. & c. R. R. Action
at law to recover damages.
s. Marks & Co. VS. FL. G. Crow, ct al Suit
in Equity to set aside fraudulent convey
ance.
]. Sellers VS. B. R. Fitch, Action at law to
recover money.
). Marks & Co. VS. A. Martindale, ct al
Confirmation.
VIM. Hutson VS. o. L G. R. R. Action
at law to recover damages.
In the matter of the assignment OF G. w.
Barr, insolvent debtor
D. I. McGuirs VS. w. r. Wells, ct al,
Confirmation.
George Connell VS. Ida NJ Connell, Divorce.
Zsttie Ball VS. C. Ball, Divorce.
C. Ball VS. Zettie Ball, Divorce.
The State of Oregon VI NJ. A. Teller, Rec
ognizance.
The State VS. John Nichols, same.
State VS. Robert O!ford, same.
Ss.te VS. Wm. Heffron. same.
State VS. Sam Paisley and Geo. Turpin,
same.
State VS. Patrick Gallager, same
krewson l. co. VS. JOS. :. purdom and II.
G. 81 cum, action at Jaw to recover damages
j. f. Saubert VS. F. H. Noble, ct al suit
in Equity for an account aud dissolution Of
partnership.
Robert Phipps, ct al VS. Sidney Mynatt, ct
al, suit i'll Equity for dissolution Of partner
ship and for an accounting.
Louis Bellils, ct al VS. John Stephan, suit
in Equity for dissolution Of partnership and
for an accounting.
z. w. Barrage, ct al VS. The Bonanza Gold
and Quicksilver Mining Co., ct al, Confirm
alton.
John S. Miller, ct al VS. Wm McBee, ct
al, action at law to recover real property.
Robert Phipps VS. Sarah J Kelley, ct al.
Confirmation.
P.H. Dawson VS. Ella NJ. Dawson, divorce.
Carolina Il. Wood vs. T. Nj. Wool, aale'
EllzaDeth Alexander vs. David Alexander,
same.
Klttie Gs,Lb rt vs. Keeler H. Gabbert,
same.
J-s. A. Watkins vs. Elizabeth j. Watkins,
same.
Susan Banks VS. John Banks, same.
W. Cochran vs. w. ". Walker, action at
law o recover money
B. Herman vs. VIM. Phillips, ct al, SAINT
3. o. Booth VS. NJ. A. Roberts, SAM.
Dram & CO. VS. John alackey, same.
JOS b. Upton VS. W. 3. Atterbury, same.
W. F. Owens VS. JAS G. Marshall. suit IN
Equity to foreclose mortgage
H. H. Nichols VS. Edison Adams, action
atlaw to recover money.
Henry Conn vs. The Countyof Douglas, ct
a., appeal from County Court on assessment
of damages.
Geo. " Jones vs. The County of Douglas,
same.
John Bruckner vs. Douglas County, same.
Thos. McCul1oueh VS. Douglas County,
same.
W. r. KerleY vs. Harrison Allen.
S. Marks s. Co. vs. Jno. N. McCulloch,
action at law to recover money.
f. j. Page VS. Sampson Sutherlin, same,
Jos. Cellers vs D. S. ctriker;et ct al, suit in
equity to foreclose mortgage
T r. Sheridan VS. j. F. w Sauhert. same
John Rast VS. D. B. Hamblin, same
Tie State Of Oregon, ex Rel VS. A. G.
Young, ct al.
Ed Haines rs w. r. Patterson, applica
tion for writ Of Review.
Page & Dlmmicb VS. Wm. K. Hannah, eft
81, suit in equity to foreclose mortgage.
Abraham, Wheeler & Co VS. NJ. f. Pogur,
ct al action at law to recover money
JAS. Davis VS. WIN. McNeel, action at law
to recover real property and damages.
Rasalie Peland, ct al v Thos 0'Reiliy, Ell
al, suit to quiet title to real Property.
w Trask VS. r. T. McCulloch, action at
law to recover money.
JIM. Rosenberg & Co. VS. E.. j. Sutherliu.
same.
Geo. w. Riddle VS. John Nvinders. ct a
same.
Abraham, Wheeler & 20. vs. George De
ment, same.
Nasburg Hirst vs. Henry Flock, same
Willis & Jones vs. Solomon Abraham
same.
School Commissioners VS. Geo. w. Noah
SUIT in equity to foreclose mortgage.
0. L. Willis VS. Abraham, Wheeler & Co,
action at law to recover money
In the matter Of the assignment of Georg
III
The State Of Oregon vs. George Adams an,
James Adams, rrcOgnizance
In the matter of the assignment of B. r
Fitch, lnsolyent debtor.
j. w. Carlon VS. J. r. Dixon, ct al.
II N Dumbleton VS. L Murton, actor
at law to recover personal property al,
damages.
H NJ Dumbleton vs. Constance Dakyns
same:
RETURNED Emanuel Hartsock some tw
years ago went back to old Virginia. his ma
tive home but has returned to Oakland t
stay He,is = frst-class carpenter. We wei
come hila to our fair western cline.