Beverly banner. [volume] (Beverly, N.J.) 1877-1964, 1885-09-19

8. Executors of Henry Kreiner VS..
Frank Matlack, ct ais. Case. NJ, r.
Sooy and A. Flanders.
4. John McLardy VS.. Frank Matlack,
ct ais. Case. M. R. Sooy and A. Elan
ders.
5. William EIdridge VS.. William B.
Wills. Case Israel Roberts and M. L.
Haines.
g. Edward Barrett vs.. John Roman.
On Appeal. Hutchinson & Beldon and
NJ. Hutchinson.
7. George B. johnson VS.. Robert W.
Darlington. Case. c. E. Hendrickson
and j. H. Gaskill.
8. Lafayette l.. Webster VS.. Townsend
B. Baldwin Case. NJ r. Sooy and R
S. Jenkins.
9. David G. Smith VS.. Harriet ID,
Rogers ct ais. Trespass. j. II. Gaskill
and J. G. Hendrickson.
10. James Peak VS.. John Clevenger.
Replevin. Samuel K Robbins and j. Q.
Hendrickson.
IL. State-Thomas Adams, Prosecutor,
VS.. David Warner. Certiorari, Hutch
inson Il Beldon and M. r. Sooy.
II. Mary A. Wells vs.. Job H. Gaskll
implicated, &c. Case. NJ. r. Sooy and
C. E. Hendrickson.
13. Alfred Danley VS.. Job H. Gaskill.
implicated, &c. Case. NJ. R. Sooy and
G. E. Hendrickson.
IA. Samuel S. Hansbury VS.. Chas.
Riley. Trespass. M. r. Sooy and
George Gilbert.
Is. Amos G. Miller VS.. Samuel Rud.
derow Lien. ]. H. Gaskill and b. d.
Shreye.
Is. Charles Heiser VS., Patrick Martin.
Trespass. G. <. Hendrickson and M. r.
Sooy.
All the cases in the Supreme Court
were ready, and No. 8 was referred to
Joseph H. Gaskil as referee.
In the Circuit Court No. / went off
for the present. Nos. 2, 3, and 10
off by consent. The rest were ready.
A jury was then empanelled in Case
No. l of the Supreme List, after which
the Judge said he was ready to hear
excuses Of jurors. AS usual there were
the usual number Of jurors who had
business that nobody else could attend
to. His Honor remarked that Jurors
who were so anxious to get excused
generally were the best. Henry B.
Satterthwaite was excused on certii-
cate of physician and Joshua S. Feni-
more on account of an infrmity in
hearing. Others were excused for one
and two weeks.
After cautioning the jurors empan-
elled not to allow any one to converse
with them on the case they were about
to try, Court took recess.
At the afternoon session the Jurors
not engaged on Case No. l were dis
charged until Monday morning at 10
o'clock.
The case Of Joseph M. Reeves. VS..
Job HI. Gaskill, and Others, implicated,
was then opened by Col. Stratton. The
suit was founded on promissory note
made by Joseph g. Haines and Job
H. Gaskill to Sarah C. Ellis dated
January /, 1883. Mr.. Reeves sues for
the amount of the note, 500, and in
terest less 5000 principal and interest
to December 81, 1888.
Joseph G. Haines was the first wit
ness and said he was one of the defen-
dants in the suit; he recognized note
and said he saw Mr.. Gaskill sign it at
Reeves hotel, Pemberton. Mr.. Gas
kill was in room adjoining bar-room
and witness brought him in and he
signed the note.
Samuel S. COLON recognized the
note and saw Sarah Z. Ellis endorse it.
Mr.. Reeves was to cash the note, and
it laid in Colloms store till he was
ready to take it, when the cash was
paid into the hands of witness.
The note was then offered in evil
dence.
The Grand Jury finished their labofs
about six o'clock on wednesday even
ing, and returned twenty-four true bills
of indictment. The following prisoner
were brought into court this morning
and answered to indictments found
against them:
John Wells, Burlington, larceny, not
guilty also stealing clothing, not gail
ty
Daniel Winkelspecht, robbing shoot
ing gallery at Riverside not guilty.
Peter Hurd, grand larceny; not
guilty.
Edward Casperson Beverly, assault
and battery; not guilty.
Kate Beugliss, larceny; not guilty.
Joseph Dueschle, Mount Holly, as
sault and battery; not guilty.
John Fitzpatrick, Mount Holly, as
sault and battery not guilty.
Richard Brown, Chesterfield, assault
and rape; not guilty.
Frederick Tenny, larceny; guilty.
Frank Pearce, assault and battery
not guilty.
Sixty complaints of varions kinds
were made to the Grand Jury, 48 of
which were considered. The alleged
illegal liquor selling cases from Bur.
lington were ignored, as was also the
complaint against James Russ, of Bey-
erly. True bills were found against
Mrs. Hershoff and Edward P. Grooms,
of Beverly, for illegal liquor selling,
and the libel cases of that place were
also ignored. A true bill was also
found against the Beverly BARRIERS who
had the cutting ARRAY with razors in
=