Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1885-02-03
THE DrsTRIcT QUIT.

Judge Rives' Charge 30 the Jury.
The District Court of the Sixth Judicial
| District OF the State Of Nevada in and for
the county Of Eureka met yesterday morn.
ing, Hon. Henry Rives presiding.
The calendar being called for, ii was dis.
posed Of as follows:
State OF Nevada ys. Ben Marshal; as.
sault with intent to kill. Passed for second
setting.
Pioneer Con. Mining Company vs.. W. A,
Roberts. Continued for the term at the re.
ouest OF counsel.
State OF Nevada, OK rel Martha Garrett
vs.. st. Clair Barnes ct al; answer. By
jury Feb. l6.
A. p. Hegemsn vs.. J. G. Powell; answer.
Passed to second setting by request Of
counsel.
Thomas Haley vs.. P. G. Manning; an.
swer. Same order.
Morris II. Joseph vs.. Red Bird Con. Min.
ing Company; answer. BY jury Feb. %,
George Young vs.. Adolph Brehe; answer,
By jury Feb. "a.
County of Eureka ys. Baker Il Wines;
demurrer. Passed without day ct request
of counsel.
Albion Mining Company va. Richmond
Mining Company OF Nevada; demurrer.
Same order.
O. L. Broy vs.. Secret Canyon Tunnel
and Mining Company; demurrer. Cause
dismissed on motion Of counsel Of plain
tiff. and at cost OF plaintiff.
f. M. Baum vs.. b. W. Goodhue ct al
demurrer. Passed ct request OF counsel
without day.
E. NJ. Baum VS.. Goodhue & Schroeder;
4 ~ Mama nFAAY
j. Il. Howes ct al. VS.. O~nondage Gold
and Silver Mining Company; demurrer,
No counsel on behalf of demurrer-the
Court ordered overruled for want Of prose.
cution for ten days, in which to file an
answer.
j. @. Powell OF al. vs.. Bowman Mining
Company; demurrer-Passed at request
OF counsel without day.
James Rowe ct al, vs.. Richmond Mining
Company; demurrer-Same order.
Paxton Il 90. Va. Henry Kind; demur-
rer-Demurrer overruled by consent; ten
days. by jury Feb. 25.
II. Sadler W. Henry Kind; demurrer
Same order; by jury Feb. IS.
f. j. Kiesel 4 Co. vs.. Henry Kind; de-
murrer. Same order; by jury; Feb. 20.
Thos. Fitzharris vs.. b. W. Goodhue. e'
al; on appeal. BY jury Feb. "a.
Joe Dejou VI. A. Dumas. Passed te
second setting at request Of counsel.
John r. Garrett vs.. John Potter. Judg'
ment for plaintiff according to the findings
and conclusions hereinafter 10 be entered.
Tho following Grand Jurors were ex'
cused from serving: J. w. Lambert, ii
Cole, Joseph Tognini, B. F. McEwen, p
Mcbride and o. Rice.
NJ. b. Bartlett was sworn in as foreman
OF the Grand Jury.
Judge Rives. after calling the attention
OF the Grand Jury TO the prisoners in Gus
tody and their duties relative to the i'm
mediate consideration Of their cases, ther
proceeded TO charge them as follws
Gentlemen, q matter Of vital Importance
to the administration of Justice in thi'
county, and one which deserves your dill
rent aud patient investigation. Is th'
alleged attempt at bribery in the recen
Albion. Richmond trial. which is now pend
ing In this court on motion for n new trial
From the afidayits and evidence sub
mitted 70 the court upon that motion, il ii
plainly evident that q most outrageous at
= temp. to foul the pure fountains Of justic'
were not only attempted, but consum
: mated upon that trial, but tn
only fear entertained by the Cour
az q legal proposition, Is that tn
sdroit aud cunning methods pursued
in accomplishing this nefarious attempt q
. bribery, employing the questionable eva
sion OF present making, may place tn
, artihcer beyond the pale OF our erimina
I statutes. This will be q matter for you
consideration. and the Court s%incerel.
hopes that In this respect its presen
A opinion may be successfully overcome
In connection with this matter, however
the Court il also Of the opinion that som
. Of the parties making sfidavits TO be used
. upon the motion have been lees cunning
and that the perjury painfully conspicuou
. In ,hose afidavits NAV render the guilt,
: parties within the reach Of our crimins
proceedure-spare neither time nor pain
to bring the guilty parties to Justice.
3 b.. Mayer W. Enterprise Mining anc
Irricating Company. The default OF the
4 defendant having been duly entered, test
r mony was introduced on behalf OF IN
/ plaintiff, and judgment was ordered In III
behalf for the amount claimed and costs, II
accordance with the findings and conclu
sions. to be hereinafter filed.
;. Ordered by the Court that q yenir'
OF so Jurors be drawn 10 serve as tria
Jurors for the ensuing term, w~hereupon, A
A. Andre. Clerk, and the Judge proceeded
10 draw alternately from the jury box tn
names OF 80 persons for the ensuing term
and the same we're duly certified and
venire ordered 10 be issued, returnabl
Monday. Feb. I6, 1885, at 10 O'Clock A. NJ
Court adjourned until the 10th instan
at 10 A. NJ.