The Indianapolis sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1880-1904, 1885-02-26

under the Old Law. and in that county !
have seen $4,000 of property confscated
under il. | am opposed 10 the msjoritY con-
hscating the property OF The minority, and,
OF course, / am mucn more opposed to the
minority con hscsting the property of the
old Law, If we can not have the proposed bill
made q law.
Mr.. BOYD There are some objec
lions to this bill. ont il is far
better than the old one. When il goes 70 the
Senate / hope that the bill will be Sc
anend eo as TO strike out lines 20, -, Is %
20 and 81 and ell before the word provided"
10 line > OF Section 3 page printed bill).
30 IS 10 allow any man the right to drain mis-
lard If he Is willing to pay damages
Dir. GORDON moved The previous ques-
tion.
The House seconded the demand. aud uu-
der its operation the bill passed by yeas 90,
n6ys so.
Mr. FRENCH explaining his vote said
that the bill lad been SO d15torsd as u be
come monstrosiiy, and be would be com
PEELED 20 vote no"
Mr.. GORDON. when his name was called.
ssio: The bill is far better than toe old one.
Ii does a~av with the most serious cbjec-
tons. and I shall vote aye"
Alr. H0BAN in explanation OF his vote,
said The old Law vas robbery on poor
men, VINO have hard struggles 10 support
are Democrats I vote aye"
Mr.. SMITH, Of Tippscanoe, said; This bill
Tepesls very bad law, and while the bill
may be free from OBJ rctiesis. yst a. IT Is
far better tban the law, snail 7ote aye"
TIE vote was thea announced rs above.
60 the bill passed.
NARCOTICS Is TdE SCHOOL.
Mr. Staleys bill A. r 16l relating to the
teaching of physiology aud hygiene IN the
public schools wss Je ID the third tine aud
passed. oy ayes 81, nays 80
Mr. FRENCH explaining his vote, said
he thought that if there were morality aud
intelligence 10 the pablo schools. this qGss
ton would o. properly taught; therefore
he voted no"
Mr.. HARRELL when his name was
called, said ne believed that sucn Law on
the statute books would throw our school
books to change aud make everything in
consistent; be therefore voted no"
Mr.. LLOYD, explaining his vote: Ever
since l have been here havs bsen opposed
TO sll laws that will necessitats unnecessary
change in our text books, and as this bill, II
il becames Law, will compel that, I vote
s'nO.n
Mr.. McHENRY: Fo, two reasons do
not favor this bill. One is because OF the
change of the text books the other bscaasa
il is TOO comprehensive TO be defined Clearly
in any law. I vots mo
Mr.. McMICHAE1, when hIs name wss
called, said: DO not ses in the mes3ure
vhefe benefit can occur. because 1t is not
clearly defined. vote no"
Mr.. PASSAGE: Becuuse it will not
necessitate a change II text books, and be-
cause the evils OF alcohol should bs learned
in the schools I vote ave"
Mr. PArTEN, in explaining his vote, said
| II looks Ike o jobbery, especially IN oar
common schools I vote mo 4"
Mr.. RIVERS: Because il viii teach chii-
dren who will have no other means of learn.
ing il, the evils OF alcohol vote aye"
All SMITH, OF Tippscanos l am not
fsnstical tsmperSncs toan. bat ss the texs
books on this question gre already pra
pared and as it should be taught to check
the era OF drgn kennsss, | vote ave"
Mr. STALEY, when his name was called,
fald: owe II TO my constituents 10 sup.
port The bill, and were my wife and daughter
here they would urge me to vote for is; aye,
tue sainfed mother above would urge me u
vote for il. I vote AYE"
Mr.. WILSON: IL is not taught as il should
be. and believing that it should be made
mandatory. ! vote aye"
Mr.. GO0DING: If this bill were confined
Is alcohol and tobacco I should vote for it
but il embraces all narcotics, aud to teach
al the lstter won'd oe ID consume al ths
school time. vote no "
Tiif rote was then announced a. above.
So the bill passed
Mr.. WILLIAMS: ] move 10 reconsider the
vote DS WulCn the Dil passed. III tue haste
10 call up the bill one feature of it was over
looked-thst is that all pupils shall be so
taught-even the abecedarians
Mr.. ADAMS: ! move to lay the motion
Oh the table. There could have been no sur.
prise.
The motion to reconsider was laid on the
table by yeas IS. nays 80.
JOHN MARTINS cLAIu.
Mr.. Pendleton's bill Il i. So for work
done the Insane sylum came up "a the
second reading
The question being upon the engrossmeDt
: - 3D.