The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, 1885-10-24
jackson home, I went there TO ael

he was sick, II felt sorry for him
and / feel sorry for you too, Mrs.
jackson. He said if | would step
into private room he would give
me glass of wine, and if / would
go home and say nothing more
about it, he would give me his word
that if Mr.. Jackson came there
again, he would give him no more
liquor. Mr.. Jackson didn't know
anything about my bringing this
suit; he has tried to force me to
withdraw it. | gave Mr.. Kinney
power of attorney. l got the funds
from no relatives.
Cross-examined by Mr.. Hatch:
l shall have lived here three years
next Christmas. My husband has
been in the habit of drinking more
or less since the first year after our
marriage. He drank heavily at
times in Washington Territory, but
not to keep him from work. He
has drunk more than ever before
during the past year. / knew that
he drank occasionally before our
marriage. He began to go to the
Anchor Saloon soon after it opened.
He first began to miss days work
last year, about July. l do not
know how many days he lost this
year. He has not been in good
health for the past three years.
ROBERT LANG, sworn: | know
where the Anchor Saloon is located.
| know Mr.. jackson. live in the
Sailors Home. | saw Mr.. Jackson
come out of the Anchor Saloon as
near as | can remember about the
last Saturday of May. He was what
is called well under the influence of
liquor. He did not recognize me.
He made a remark to some men
near by about trying to stop man
from drinking whiskey in free
country. l saw Mrs. Jackson go
out with her hat on, rs if she was
going to look for HIM, and l passed
on.
Cross examined by Mr.. Hatch: 1t
was about ten O'Clock when l met
Mrs. Jackson near the Bethel Church
gate. jackson walked right across
the street to the opposite side, and
spoke to gentleman there. L do
not remember whether it was dark
or light, but know it was very fine
night.
(The evidence for the plaintiff
will be continued in next issue.)
THE DEFENCE.
Mr.. LovEJoY, sworn: | am sole
proprietor of the Anchor Saloon.
My instructions to bar-keepers were
always very particular to obey all
rules and regulations, and the pro-
visions of the law, particularly with
regard to any notice that might be
given, and not to give liquor to any
intoxicated person. l trusted they
would respect the woman's notice.
| do not know Jackson. Never
knew there were such parties in
Honolulu.
Cross-examined by Mr.. Kinney
l have been in the liquor business
about eight years. knew what the
laws were, have always tried to obey
the laws, and to keep myself in
formed. l have never known Of any
man getting drunk in my saloon
Have never known of any man being
furnished with liquor after notice
had been given to the contrary.
have never known of liquor being
sold in my saloon on Sundays or OF
holidays. l have never considered
the matter of selling to man unit
he is drunk, nor of selling to {
drunkard. 1t is understood that
man is not expected TO remain owe
half an hour in saloon. Abou
selling to n man until he is drunk,
have not considered the law bearin,
upon that matter. There are man
things in the liquor business, as il
other business, that man does nc
consider. l have read over the law
| L nave llCilItt lnclltiOu Vi III
case of Mrs. Watson against til
keystone Saloon. was not ir
terested in saloons ut that time.
was in the liquor business in Ser
TENDER, 1883. l did not interes
myself in that case. heard it wa
a compromised case. | am not awar
from my own knowledge that Mrs
Jackson had given n notice to m
bar-keepers. They never told me q
it. They told me she had bee
there. think my bar-keepers hav
not done wrong. ! presume ths
some notice should be given by pa
ties wishing to prevent the giving {
liquor to any person. | imagine I'll
section under which the suit
brought applies to all licensed dea
ers. have taken no legal advi'
on the point. pay 81 200 a yet
for license.
Q. Do you consider, if man wi