Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1885-10-07
MISCELLANEOUS.
iMFOR
~....F0B..-
OWNERS AND L0cAT0RS
M NES.
APPLICATION pon PATENT.

Whera papers hava once been lied with the
Register and heeeiver they become O part OF
the record, and CAL neither bs withdrawn nGr
returned. but must ia m to tina Gen.
eral Land Office.
An application will be rejected when the de-
scrfpt1on OF tho premises Ia errnue0ug or In
sufficient
Application for patent viii be rsisetsd be-
Ga1HB:
First The notics was pubiisnsd without she
knowledge Of the Register.
~SecDnd-rhs notice was NOT published In q
newspaper desi gnated 10 published nesrasf this
claim.
rhlrd-Record title was found dsfecttve,
and
Fourrh-A previous application had been
made Tur the same premises, which was with
drawn pending . suit IN Courr commencsds by
the adverse claimant.
An application tor patent viii bs reieGtsd
when the survey does not accurately iefine the
boundaries Or this oinim.
Where tina claim was not located in accurd-
aucs with Law.
Inct portions Ut q claim, application for
patent may De made by either for that portion
Of the claim owned by him. but whare several
parties own undivided interests in . mining
claim all snonId Join in an application for o
pafent.
A person on association may purchase Az
many placer Locations an the local Law admits.
and embraces them all in one application for .
patent.
Two or more Iodes cannot be embraced in
ona application for q patent except tor placer
oiaIms embracing TWO or mnre loaes within
their boundaries.
Papers sworn TO before any person purport-
ing 10 act Az . deputy for tins Register and Be-
ceiver cannot De recorded as evidences.
In all patents for mining claims situated
within the interior boundaries of q town site
o ciAuss is Inserted excepting and excluding
all town property rights upon ths surface,
and al honses, buildings. structures, Lots,
blocks. streets. alleys or 0fher municipal Inn
p~rovemenrs not belonging To the grantee here
IN. and all rights necessary or proper To the
occupation, possession and enjoyment Of tins
same
Publication Of notes must ia made a only
ons newspaper for the period Of 90 iays.
Notice must Be published 10 consecutive
weeks In weekly newspapers. and IN daily
reTspapers so days must sispse between the
irAt anu last insertions.
Where the Observation-Disclosures thsdaiiy Issue
Of . newspaper for publication Of notices of .
mining application for patent IL is not a COM
pliHnce With law 70 change TO tle weekly sdi-
zion of the same paper without authority of
the Register.
land yithdrsws it from the operation Of this
homestead and pre-emptiun IAws. A hearing
for the purpose Of proving this agricultural
character Of such land If MT allowed. Land
containing Valuable deposits OF slafe may Ou
snrersd under ths mining acts.
ADVERSE GLAEas.
Adverse claimants must aIe 8 separate and
distinct claim against sach application which
II ~ alleged conflicts with tia premises owned
1y such adverse claimant.
L The papers In an adverse claim. ones Al.d
cannot De Withdrawn. mt becomes . part Of this
record.
When an adverse claim has besu iled il can.
not be amended 40 ~ 70 embraces q lnraer pGr.
tton 0f the premises than tliaf described IN tne
original adverse claim.
An adverse claim must bs made out IN
proper form and iisd in the proper local OH ce
turing the period Of publication III the appli-
cation for tbs patent u De effective.
It is the dury VI tfs adverse claimant to
commences suit in proper form within the re-
4 quIrsd time. and ii hs trusts Vie uncertain
medium Of the United States mail he must
abide the GnnBsqusnees, should the delay
snsue, through misfortune or accident. Should
. the failure 70 commences suit be the result III
the curruptu or dishonest actfunof his attorney,
the Interior Department. cannot redress tbs
wrong.
An adverse claimant should sat forth in do.
tail tbs fscfa up0n which he bases mis- adverse
ciAlm. A statement in general tsrsns, smbndy-
Ing conclusions of law, without stating the
facts specially, VIII not Os considered Ia sv1-
Deuce.
An adverse claimant should show . compli-
ance with the local laws III reenrxflnK his claim
snd IN regard 70 axpsnditurt .. and shall ule q
copy Of The original noftes of his location, and
show the nature or extent Of thu conflict
alleged.
An allegation OF parties to a suit that they
compose the company is sufficient. and tilsy
are not requires 20 prove that thoy are this
original ~locAtors on the Identical parties who
present tbs sdvarse claim.