St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1885-01-11
DISTRICT Court.
before Luige Brill.


In the matter of the assessment for con-
struction Of stoae sidewalks, estimate No. 4;
continued two weeks.
In the matter Of the assessment for grad
ing and guttering Joselte street, from Day
ton avenue to Fuller street; continued two
weeks.
In the matter Of the assessment for curb
ing and paving Broadway street, from laird
to Mississippi street; continued two weeks.
In the matter of the assignment of VIM.
Schmidt u Co.; to be heard by Judge
Simons.
Alfred n. Hehre VS.. John Larson; sub
mitted.
Warren H. Mead and Philip Reilly VS..
Chester Hitchcock; submitted
Anna l.. LindhOlm VS.. John Lindholm
heard and taken under advisrment
TAYLOR u Craig company Us, 2. r. Nc
Donald ct al. pend and taken under advise
ment.
Christian Koch VS.. Mary Frank; contin-
ucd.
f !ward Rice and John Kennedy, serving
trustees, VS.. the st. Paul IL Pacific Railway
company ct AL. submitted
Edward Rec and John S. Kennedy, sur
viving trucstees, VS.. the First division of the
st. Paul IL Pacific Railway company; sub
mittcd.
John s. Kennedy, surviving trustee, VS..
the First division OF the st. Paul q Pacific
Railway company; submitted.
The Northwl stern Fuel company vs. Lang
don, Richardson IL Co, heard and taken
under adviscment.
Maria Hendress VS.. Carl Hendress; heard
and granted.
II. NJ. Weiss & Co. VS.. " B. Cohen; or.
der to show cause dismissed.
In the matter OF the assignment OF VI. A.
Schultz 81 Co., insulvents; continued.
In the matter OF the assignment Of J. NJ.
Smith X Co.; continued.
D. f. Wcdelstadt VS. c. f. Keller ct al
no response and stricken off.
A. +. johnson vs.. NJ. II. franklin ct al.
and Wheeler d Carter, garnishees; no re-
spouse and stricken Off.
|. Alfred Plciss W. Emma Plelss; heard and
taken under advisrment.
The State of Minnesota ex rel. Robert II.
Strong VS.. e. d. Strong; submitted.
COURT CASES.
Before judge Wnkinl
Met and adjourned without transactlng any
business to 10 4. IN. Monday.
DECISIONS.
10y "uAA' w hktu
Thomas Il. Murrctt vs. Reuben Overpeck
suit for recovery of SO worth of harness in
the keeping of Overpeck, with whom plain.
tiff boarded his horses In summer, which hRr-
ness was stolen or disappeared from the
stables; verdict for defendant for costs and
disbursements Of trial.
john Wagner ". +. +. Edmond; deci-
sion Of Alfred 5. Hall, referee, that the only
agreed con pensation Of defendant as clerS
for the plaintiff from February
1852, to July, 1854, was sl.5C
per day for his services, and 10 b,
paid 81 30 Tor every sunday be worked. Tia
defendant believing enormously that he wai
| entitled TO $50 per month from July, 1883
until he left the service Of the plaintiff cred
/ tied himself or had credited that amount o
wages in the books. lie worked 1S6 DAYS
| jncludiug fifty-fvc SUNDAYS which at Sl.5C
per day would amount 10 sl.tT9, and wa
/ erroneously credited Sl,216. % or an excess
I of S91.13 more than ne was entitled TO. Tha
I be was paid in al by plaintiff $1,000 or $3I
! more than he was entitled 20. That the dc
| feudaut also routed q room OF plaintiff 10
! s. . month for twelve months. The plaintiff
I IS adiudged entitled to $50 and The cost
I Of this action.