The San Antonio light. (San Antonio, Tex.) 1883-1886, 1885-10-14
THE DISTRICT COURT.
Trial OF Justice Neuendorff, Charged
With Malfeasanee IN Office.

At the reassembling Of the District
court yesterday afternoon, the case OF
Max Neuendorfr was proceeded with.
Hattie Baxter deposed to being ar
rested on n warrant Issued from Max
Neuendorll's court by II. krempkau,
and that she paid to him fine of Sl3 60.
first paying So and then the balance.
An affidavit was submitted showing
that il bore no signature, nor had It been
sworn to by any complainant. Barbara
Cano testified to the same facts. In this
case the docket was offered In evidence,
showing the entry that defendant had
plead guilty and was fined one dollar
and costs for being vagrant. The
cases Of Carlotta Galvan, Emma Nicker-
son, Jesusa CARA and Lilly" were
shown by the docket entry that they
had all pleaded guilty aud were fined,
the money having been received either
by defendant or krempkau.
Cuca Esparza deposed to the same
facts.
Georgia Guerrero stated that she was
arrested some time In June on COM
plant from Neuendoril's court and paid
= q
stating he would pay the balance him
self If 1t became necessary.
Kitty Hutchinson, or Miller, deposed
TO the fact that an affidavit was made
against her, and that she went TO Neuen-
dorn7s Office and demanded trial, and
Krempkau told her If she paid S. she
could go home. She paid the money to
Krempkau and he gave her receipt for
Sl3 G5. The docket in this case showed
1t was dismissed.
Henry Krempkau stated that he ar
rested Kitty Miller and gave her re-
ceipt for Sl3 %, although only So was
collected. which witness turned over to
defendant. Witness denied having re-
ceived $40 in the case OF the woman
Lilly. lie never arrested her. Defend
ant told him Ii was n mistake and should
have been marked dismissed. lie col
lected money from Hattie Baxter and
paid the last amount to Fred Bader. He
deposed to collecting the money in the
other cases mentioned and turning the
money over.
Fred Bader stated that he was CON
stable of the precinct, and that the book
| produced was his fee book. lie denied re-
| ceiving any money from Ida Baker
| George Guerrero, Regina Sanchez, Cuca
| Esparzas, Emma Nickerson or Hattie
| Baxter. In Nellie Towards case. he
admitted recovering 81; in Kitty Hutch
| insons and Nincente Sanchez case no
money had been received by him.
| Krempkau told him that defendant was
| In the habit of sending him out to col
leot money without any legal documents
| and witness instructed krempkau to
| collect money on legal papers.
Witness could not make up his report
| from defendants, because II had been
entered up.
| Tom Harrison stated that he was an
| attic rney at-law, and that he represented
| the plaintiff in case OF Clifford, john
son Il Winter VS.. G.. II. Merritt In de-
PENDANTS court, and he had CONVERSE
ton with him about making other par
| ties to the suit.
| A motion was made by Mr.. Pasohal to
| Join the remainder of the executive
| committee of the Committee of 100 as
defendants. Witness afterwards spoke
to defendant about granting the motion,
and defendant replied that he did II fol-
the sake of extra costs. Witness spoke
to defendant again when Bader said to
him that he would not win that suit and
defendant asserted that would be all
right and proposed that witness should
make n motion to have the whole com.
mittee of 100 Joined rs defendants, and
that II it were made 1t would be granted
and the extra costs should be divided
with witness, and he expressed desire
that the matter should be kept secret.
Edward FrOebOese depOsed to receiv'
ing various amounts from Max Neuen'
dorll, who stated they were fines col
ected by him.