Salt Lake evening Democrat. [volume] (Salt Lake City, Utah) 1885-1887, 1885-10-10
THE CIVIL CALENDAR.
Cases Set for the Present Term-A
Long List of Litigants.


The Third District Courtroom was
filled this morning with good repre-
sentation of the light and heavy lega
luminaries of the Salt Lake bar, to listen
to the setting of the civil docket of the
present term. The cold, drilling rain
caused large crowd of listeners to flock
from the streets to the comfortable quar-.
tiers of the courtroom.
The civil cases for the term were SET
for the following dates:
! TUESDAY, OCTOBER Is.
No. 49, Frederick Heath VS. Salt Lake
County. ]. D. Lomax for plaintiff, q.
Snow for defendant.
So. Mary M. Bevis VS.: James Mcknight
ct al. w. w. Gee for plaintiff, Hoge and
Mcknight for defendant.
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER IA.
60. BENZ. Hampton vs. George I. Bow
ron. Marshall & Royle for plaintiff;
Sutherland & Mcbride for defendant.
ia. Henry Collins VS.. Daniel Leatham.
E. T. Sprague for plaintiff; G. R. Max
well for, defendant.
al. Annette Cummings ct al VS.. Brig
ham Young, ct al. Darke & Kenner for
plaintiff; Sheeks & Rawlins for defend
ant.
THURSDAY, OCTOBER Is.
So. Amos X. Smith VS.. Samuel Han
mock, ct al. E. T. Sprague for plaintiff;
Hoge & Burmester for defendant
1876. E. A. Cook ct al VS.. M. T. Eakel.
Marshall & Royle for plaintiffs; w. w.
Gee for defendant.
F III. Laura A. Croker vs.. Isabelle
Brunker. G. O.. Whittemore for plaintiff;
Williams & Young for defendant.
FRIDAY, OCTOBER Is.
80. ]. NJ. Kennedy VS.. w. M. Pierce.
Hall & Marshall for plaintiff; Hoge &
Burmester for defendant. .
LIS. Frank Foote va. the Kansas City
S. &. R. Co. R. B. Trip for plaintiff;
Hall & Marshal for defendant.
OCTOBER II.
81. w. S. Simpkins ct. al. vs.. G. F. At
kins. G. K. Gilchrist for plaintiff; James
Mcknight for defendant.
SO. B. B. Bitner vs.. Utah Central Ry.
Co. Sheeks & Rawlins, for plaintiff;
Williams & Young, for defendants.
154. Park City Water Works VS..
William Muryhew. w. I. Snyder. for
OCTOBER 20.
1922 Lewis Oviatt VS.. C. F. Dixon ct.
al. ]. ID. Lomax, for plaintiff; James
Mcknight, for defendant.
103. D. 0. Dickinson vs.. w. P. Rowe
Woods & Hoffman, for plaintiff; Hoge &
Burmester, for defendant.
1872. E. A. Ireland, Receiver, VS.. w.
H. III. Bowers ct al. Marshal & Royal
for plaintiff; Darke 4 Kenner for defend
ant.
OCTOBER 81.
70. Thomas Mcbride, vs. Joseph Boxer
ct al. Sheeks & RawIins for plaintiff:
Darke & Wenner for defendants.
III. Will White ct al. VS.. Joseph Hay
ward. Hoge & Burmester for plaintiffs;
Denney for defendant.
161. John b. Bennion vs. E. A. Ireland |
ct al. Hall & Marshall for plaintiff;
Woods & Hoffman for defendants.
OCTOBER %.
lib. U. j. Wenner vs.. Elias Smith. U. |
j. Wenner for plaintiff; Bennett, He X
ness & kirkpatrick for defendant.
l16. Lewis Oviat VS.. Evan Phelps. J.
d. Lomax for plaintiff; Hoge & BURMESE.
er for defendant.
ITO. Herman Brisacher vs. J. II. Gill
espie: w. w. Gee for plaintiff; w. w.
Woods for defendant.
OCTOBER %.
81. William Brochen ct. al. VS.. job,
Brooks. Hoge & Burmester for plaintiff:
B. H. & K. for defendant.
l18. Augusta Hogan VS.. Alex. Burt.
Woods & Hoffman for plaintiff; J. d.
Lomax for defendant.
$50. j. W. Farrell ct. all, VS.. Randolph
Hagen: ]. D. Lomax for plaintiff; Woods
Z Hoffman for defendant.
OCTOBER 26.
81. Charles F. Blandin VS.. M. M. Hill. |
sutherland q Mcbride for plaintiff; Pres
ey Denny for defendant.
IL. II. A. Van Praag vs. E. A. Ireland.
,res'ey Denny for plaintiff, Bennett,
darkness and kirkpatrick for defendant.
l2O: Frederick Crowton VS.. J. T. Lynch.
Woods & Hoffman for plaintiff.
OCTOBER 81. t,
56. London Bank of Utah (limited) va. 8
ne Flagstaff District S. M. Co. Baskin {
M Van Horn for plaintiff, Gilchrist. t
dickson and Varian for defendant. $
IL. Henry Newell ct al. VS.. S. P. Hoyt.
}. .. Mclaughlin for plaintiff, Williams
nd Young for defendant.
l26.-B. O'Brien vs.. E. c. Dance ct al.
ioge and Burmester for plaintiff, Woods
nd Hoffman for defendant.
OCTOBER 90.
/
06. w. II. H. Bowers VS.. London Bank
Utah (limitedD. Sutherland & Nc
ride for plaintiff, Baskin & Van Horn
n defendant.
l29. William R. Stewart VS.. VIM. Jen-
lngs ct al. Marshall & Royle for plain
u; Williams & Young for defendant.
l64. Juliana Smith vs.. James Nc
night ct al. a. Snow for plaintiff. I
& Mcbride for defendants. j
OCTOBER 49,.
III: John Gagan VS.. j. III. Kyner ct al
arshall q Royle for plaintiff; Kimball
Haywood for defendants.
l4O. John Cunnington ct al. VS.. J. s. \
sott ct al. Woods & Hoffman for plain 4
is; Marshall & Royle for defendants.
100. Nils ii. Halstrom VS.. j. II. Lar
MS. Hall & Marshall for plaintiff:
rthur Brown for defendant.
OCTOBER so.
90. Frank Hoffman VS.. The London
INK OF Utah. w. w. Woods. for =
alntlff; Baskin & Van Horn for de- u
u; John Coulam ct. al. VS.. Ann Doull
!: Sprague for plaintiffs; Sheeks & =
awlins for defendant. :" i
lo4. Peter Kraller VS.. James Lawrence
oods q Hoffman for plaintiff; W. s. ~
yder for defendant. = u u
y we pay l5cents each for Coal Oil Cans. :