Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1885-08-11

fOymp.s e,andasa.l

Ma HB-ehip Chsflsaeer ct 81 rs-
Oha4. Smith 1t sI.s Judgment rnodjasd
a11 gestTistsd 70 otstin for wages a. sIs-
mss, and eosss Of lowtR Court. ssrsvs It
Haipes for appellants and Burks a Hal
lsr contra. Opinisn By EOJt. ..
No. 403-A J. Leonard VI. Territory
Of Washington; tu5ament rsTeFsed aud
ssnne rcEnanded tot 1ess trial. Oplns-
leu By Greene G. y. The Court holds
that:
lss. The inaietmssss herein charges
manslanebtsf only. WhaRAfd, ]. dast
ssuss from tkis deeissiou.
81. Thas the ruling ~ tbs trial Court,
adasittinR evidences Of the e~EteBts OF q
Istspr slsimad 70 bsvs beea written
hy dsfesdans ses sEf0g. All concur.
zsl. That taa Courts iussruetisn ~ 10
a rsesonsbIs doubt vss error.
eck. Ihe CosEt's instrustion - 10 The
presamptiou sFisiriz from defendanGs
failuse 10 exgiain evb3enas Of . Grimm
atiEg nature, was err1f.
6th. A form Of indictment for murder
In tbe first dsgres is furnished By the
OsaFt st the sloss Ct the able opision By
the Chief Jasaies.
An Impression sesros 10 prevail very
aeaer&lly among the lsesl Fraternity
that this eaas, can cnly be- retired on
skares Of 0ansisafsbleF.
No. l06--J. Gardner Kenyon ~. Rob&-
Knipe; ingmsnt reversed and cause re-
mailded fer new trial. Opinion ~
Turner, J.: A. l.. Palmer for appellant
and Hanfofd, BaFHss Hsller and Kaarl
sentra. CouFt hsla that the detective
acknowledgment ia appellants deed 10
secured by statute or that subisct.
No. sO7--kadrsa MsroliAnt Va K c.
Huineston; Judgment affirmed. Opinion
by hoyt, j. A. l.. Palmer, fer plaintiff
n error and BuFke q HalIaf centra-
Ne, li0-Wm. d. Kosl0vski ys. II. l.
Ysslsf; affirused. Opipion By WineaEd,
J. f3tFuve q Hsin4s for appellant. Q. n
Hauferd contra.
No. lIi.-t. N. BiQelaw ~. Arthur
Bccti; iuil msnt affirmed. Opinion By
WhnsNd,J. C.E-B ssWan and BarssG
Hailef for plainsih m error, O. Vensole
aml3h for dsfsDdamt 10 erfof-
No. sl4--Pu0st BcIand Iron Go. w.
Worhinztou Bros., Judgment affirmed.
OpAnion By Tarnes,J j. Jacobs q Jeunar,
J. g. Lewis 4 g<rn end Bradshaw d
Hasiha for piaintif in error, Barks d
Halter contra. The pieadiinGs Of ooan-
eel In this case were somewhat severely
criticised by the Csnrt.
No. ll9-Hoilen PARKER W. George
D'Acres, judgmeiit affirmed. A. u.
IshAw for appellant, u. L. and L.
HhArpsiesn for spriiise. be Court holds
that thsse is no rNismption from sale Of
Land ON foreclosure of mortgage In tiis
Territory,
No. 42e-Jsrusha Sparks and J. L.
sRAfka appellanls 70. Harrist II. Bro'sn
ct. al. SPECIFIES; judgment affirmed.
Opinion By 6feaLe, q. J. Williams.
Durham a Th0mps0u fof appellants,
and Rafns Mallory and b. r. Denniscn
for appeilseH.
No. z2s-Wm. Lemon and Bridget
Lemon 70. 3, Waterman and Solomon (.
Kate; Judgment rav8rseA and Gauss 70.
nAnded, with Instructions 10 ailow
anssndmtns Of complaint. The Court
holds that the sherifi's deed 10 appel
iMiz conveyed no iitAe. Dpinion by Ter.
nsr, J. q. w. Hartman, ID. r. Ballard
Aad J. q. MdFaddsn for appellants, aud
MoNsneht, Ferry. McNsneht and Nit.
ehal fer Appslleas.
No. z32--P. p. Carroll We. W. Il. An
dnrBon; rebOari-g denied. Opinion by
0sssne. Oh. r. p. Oarrsll In propriA
esrsesa for plaintiff In error ana q. w.
Hartman for Defendant 10 error.
4s Ne. 4ae-iHm. Page w. Geo. d. Bod
nsy; Judgment affirmed. Opinion by
Wfnexrd. .. Elwo,d Evans Tor plAin.
iii In error and ]. NJ. Ashton for de-
fspdant.
No. f34--lsaac Wingasd appellant ".
Barbara Jameson and J. NJ. Olaughton
eI,pelisss; judgment sffirpsed. Ovipion
by Greene, q. J. r. r. Carroll for up
psllaat and Struse, Hainss d MeMIckeD
for appelleee.
No. ls5--t3. O. Phinney Va. W. b
Hubhssd; iudRment affirmed. Opiuiop
By Nineafd, J. Hovt, J., does not coo.
cur as 20 the findings Of fact Of ths
ntferse. Richard Osborne and J. u
Haines for appellant and 7. j. Hurnes
contra.
Ne. 4ss--,J. II. wilt, guardian ct al. W
Joseph BuehteI, Judgement reversed ant
eense rsnandea. Opinion by Vineyard
J. Carroll, Ten z Ok and Heed for ap
peilsnt and Merrill 4 Heald and J.. Q
MeEadden contra.
No. 3is--Hoiisn Parker VI. ID. p. Den
ny; rehearing denied Opinion b,
Clreere, O. J.
0ollina vs. Seattle; rsaeaFing derlied
Opinion b. Wineard, J.