Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1885-12-15
couUr NOTES.
DrsrulcrcouRr.

CoUUr NOTES.
DISTRICT COURT.
J. IL Barwise VS.. G.. O. Edwards. tres.
pass 10 try title 70 soc acres three miles
west Of the CITY, Verdict for plaintiff for
one-third of the land
Il. A. Wallace vs., G.. y. King, ". r..
King and w. j Murphy. Verdict for
1925, with foreclosure of yendors lien
Suit hlcd: j G. Bennett VS., City of
[ Fort Worth, for S5G90 damages on Gc-
conn. OF injuries sustained while 10 the
employ oi tIe wGter-works. Plaintiff al-
| leges IN his petition that on the l8th day
lot October, while acting In such
/ a capacity, he was ordered by the fore
imam, Cbaucy Ward, 20 unscrrw9 bolt un
/ the engine, and that while carrying out
such instructions, the 9olt blew out,
strikmg him and dlslocaUng both his
/ kHe, Joints. The petition declares that
Ward was an unsEillful engineer and
! that the injuries OF the plaintiff, who WAS
not machinlst, resulted from Wards
( ignorance, for which the city should be
| held responsible.
COUNTY COURT.
Suit Gled; j. H. Brown VS.. D. H..
/ Hightower, on note for S4l5 40.
COMMISSIONERS COURT.
The county commissioners met in
special session yesterday
Returns from the election in Keller
school district No. ii were opened. 1t
was held to determine whether an ad-
dltional tax of twenty cents ON
the hundred dollars should be
levied to supplement the school
4 Ilt.t, AZ
stood % for and 3 against; being two
thirds majority, the proposition was de-
clared carried.
Considerable discussion took place IN
regard t. tine unsettled boundary lines be-
tween this and Dallas ana Johnson coun-
ties. Tn re seems To be q disposition %
order survey at once, and it is not ian.
probable that o resolution to that effcci
win be adopted to-day, Seriou,
complications result every yeol
from the present indetinit,
status of the com.Ys boundaries, and as
the matter must ultimately he settled 10
some way, The sooner ii Is attended 10 On,
better,
The commissioners VIII he IN session
again to-day and viii probably pass Oh
claim, against tine county.
JusucE' -Cutkr.
Yesterday was Appearance day in Jus
tice Iun's court and u unmber OF lndg
IA ut~ were taken by default The FOL
, lowing is tue doc6ct
, II Tuliy VS. Nat brdmcG accouu
50 so; Judgment by default,
I.ucroiN Bros, AGENTS, vs.. John Eggie
,tou, account SO go; judgment oy dc
fault.
LacruiS Bros, agents, vs.. G. y, Odcm
= account SIG 10; Judgment by default.
WE. Lake vs.. II, G.. CrOW,nute $3.50
, Judgment by default
d. r. Myers ys. Celia Medium, TO
; $500 damages violation contract; dis
: missed for want Of cost bond fled on MI
M0Ilie Cross vs.. Maud Lourand, di,
trcss for rent $3.50; dismissed at defene
ants cost,
.. NJ. d. Priest VS.. Joseph d. Wood, gai
Y nishment, Judgment for plaintiff to
!. amount owed by original defendant.
n S. b. Cain & Co. vs.. I. Il. DawSon,not'
. SIG; judgment by default.
r Elliott & Roc VS.. $. i. Bib, mott
IS Sg44s; Judgment by default.
i. Roche 4 Tierncy vs.. o. n. Vaughn, az
a count, Sl34 90; Judgment for amour
- claimed with foreclosure OF Lien,
~ M. Il. Ellis VS. Henry humphreys, tw
notes, $3.50 90 Judgment by default
! l.. Hutchinson vs.. j Morgan and
Edgar. note Sll0; against MO
- gnn; continued as 10 Edgar
4, Randall & Darling vs. $. b. Easter, no
a. ST. 80 aud mortgage; dismissed
/. plaintiff.
u Up. Dederlck VS.. W. b. simmons, no
r s77 80; judgment by default for aho,,ul
=. of note and foreclosure OF mortgage ne
:, ,To,eth H. Brown VS. j. IL Erersai
If note 527 judgment by deilult'
~ G. ". Gillespie VS.. j. p Afford q
= count, $50 50; judgment by default
~ I'D. Red VS. J 4. Wheat, distress l.
" rent. $40; Judgment for plantlh i'
amount claimed with foreclosure Oh nc
RIAL ESTATE TRANSPORTS.
!. Robert Bailey to Tnos. Gamewcl' o.
~ acres $ b Hopkins survey, "a mn
~ north OF Fort Worth; consideration p -
~ KITE j. Monica 10 w +. Lake. loI
NJ block D, Iiirshtlrld's additions -oAiV
cousidt ration, $1,000. ~.
,% r. Harrington and wife to ko1erI = Oh
If "A acres on Little Bear creek cousluei
hs ton, $500. .. g.,h
81 acres out OF Jessie lloss s"INo
~ consideration, $3.50.
- NJ A Bcan 10 Ro1cTt Ieall, 40 acr
10 ont of VIM. L. Prices patent; consider
~ ton, $50. n,
~ .John A. Martin aud wife to Z. Z, ia
ar ,ett lot b. block ~. jennings south 2
10 linton: Consideration, 500.
Ia Nm Burkhardt and wife to Lawfenr
GG' f. way, lots and 5, block { .Alll99fo
a' Vsal's abolition; Consideration, $500
". c. Mullins and p BOYD 70 6;
Adam and Stoefel, quit claim deco
A. ioys B. 4 aud g. Hillside additions lu'
~ sideradon, $500.