The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1885-06-17

The islsaGlz-, a5cgs fs1- years a,sc. teizS
lacas &c yisis Chil8, received from cHe Al
Egck, rwgugy pci-lrs 60 be By hin delivered
b. Al E'2sk mother. resident IN China Hs
81 gc5 pay the ucrey C. tie mother, ard ~
lg-zl-y c. tbs cCza.ry be has roE refunded /.
Go Al Ecck I. b, pcs 1czbcsG that there =
az ealbezzi s1lsnt- The G1esticn 5 whether
Z was ecrl-ii-sss vtths8 lie ilris,iicsicn Ct
tlis Ccgrl CT II CHA
The defendant excepted TO The refusal q
he Cc1rs Go i1s--ucs the i1ry that the cfenss
&C snI5ezzlgnlsu. Under E1vaiiI1 law S not
cc1ul-1e,i b. q party entrusted with money
bare Go lie d lvergC C a1Ccher n The Emrire
e China fall 1s 81 % deliver the same"
Ard i : submitted 90 behalf II the defend
All la. &C the evidence the gffecse Of en-
1szz .smsHs vas not ccEiz1isssG within this
Kingdom. Is could not have been Committed
cef-rs tie defendant Isfs sor China II the
cisrse WIS cc1Iui.esG az al Il vas committed
AL ccus11--la1sG n China a-G thersf,rs
crgii -cs have been 5Sa51 committed II this
Kingdom thas IT, cniv euihezzlsmenE that
c-ulc have been c,uIml-lsc n this case wcuit
e refusal CT tll-1re 10 par ever the money II
Cli1a C tie persc1 thsresl gn6zied- 4 flilurs
&c pay CTsr O. lccCulE fer the mccsy - All
E9ck sitlsr here CT elsewhere world aos con-
se-E-s smcezz-snenE-
Fte sv1fezcs eE the case a. It vas recorded
10 Tie Fc-ce CC1rs Is considered Is annexed
b lie I'll CT szcsptlCus. L 1Ppears BY tins
tlls the complainant All Fcck. having heard
By letter Of -le 1cn delivery Ct the money 10
BIS ugller. sVCSs o. The Gstsn,iInE sccr after
lls -szgr1 11 tbs County,, And demanded tie
rsll-u Ct tls money. The defendant said be
would pay NE bucS 1y-llt-bv, but Gu nv
meeting hin lEa-1 and making demand hs N
severed --ggU g and sue ne.
"ArClcclls Criminal PrIctice an6 Plead
Igs RIssei On Crimes 1pGn the SUBJECT
Ct venue depend uFCH the sqiic-vi1lr cases n
E1escus cass tie Prisoner received some
money the property CT has master. II ShrCr
sli-e, wlicl be sic1lG have t;sIlvsrg,; 10 him n
>5Iigr-is1i-s where be AMI his master resided
6sin- inflicted u the f-ruer county {. vas
considered By uIicrisy eff the fui-es thas
ne m,:-cfmsuz "a gls le L S1rvpshi-g where
-le prisoner rscsivef the -Gnev Is veil as n
>1liurisli-s waers be su1bezzlssd I. By mas
l-rcu1Elg FIR Il, 30 his master thaf the
stitl1s having naGs tiE receiving grurerrv
llii sm'eZz. ny r ImCGns 10 i larceny. mad.
the Ciflsuse felony waere the property WIS
lrst iIisn, and -Iar tie gif=ul;sr might there
t7rs BE aclclst n liar. Ct II any ether crunty
mn waica De carried the pruperrv
Argi- siig
IN sIg 1ilsr- EIElGrs case tia rrfscrer de-
EVsring 1s Ct behring's n tie COUNTY gf
Surrey received tan s.Idiu.rg. wli,-h be should
have rendered 30 lis MASTER IN the county sf
l1iiles=z- rhs i1liicfueul vas IN Ilfr;,fT.ssz
The Court say -glaE here there Il no szi,s
snce e any acs % bring the Prisuuer within
lie sEI-l1s Intli he u called a1cH By ~
mister . Iccugut- When called mon 81 h,
nusisr r- Icruans the prisoner denied .hat be
had ever -scgIved Il Tins WIS the irsr 4cs
t11m vllcl ne lIry cgGlt with certainty saz
tn PrlsCner lltsl,is,i b subezzie tie nIcner-
In tins cuse Ilgrz WIS 10 evidence Of the pri-
sUuer having done any act q subezzls IN the
;i1ulfy CT SGrrgZr 1Gr caalf Tie affenEe a.
;rnlFiens, 1Cr the prisoner be rui1sy wirhin
lie Statute Glnl Ia refused a 1ccuanr % b,
1aIs'zr- c-lsll.Hllg the Indictment n Md
desc
II k-g- ". lLgaigcs cited IN zuf RrsseH
al nGueT rscaIvsi n lert.sl,irs 20 be paHf
= lis snPigzer Y SGei17gilam vas held %
have 1een siubezzlsii N Nottingham.
In AZ these instances tire 1ri7riDIe II. tTlas
lie gfigHse Is committed within lie Tirfs,iI,-
lGu where the party EIi7s o. lcrruTs = 81.
person % vhgm be vas bcunG ID f.l 7rsr tie /
properly and WIN vas the owner Of IT,
II lHr case he avHsr WIS Al Fork win,
senl he m1reE ls a -Ift b ms mutier. The /
property mist Be considered b iava renamed (
~ An Fla5 InGl sum ieiiTgry. Il II Rasi
been iei-zgr-lii 70 CHINA Ellera wuuif have besu
~ .mnezzlefnenE. I1f lie cau-grsipl b- tie I
1efsntianf AMI nom delivery Ii cieariv an .m- {
ne-zizmenr IN China There ranuge b. tvs
sninezzierueHds- 5Tr IN -lie ether hanrf 4 lie
fst,int,anr laIi upan tie demand If All F,oE
lsilI1lei lIm ale uunsF, aH be mirhc sav
lia1 sa laG tlr7c1rsH- 1r cuuid aut ind ~. 4
lerz-cn, lr ili nat sala tl taxa the sruu5ie =
ieilger rie mnuey IN China. iE wuuif 1ue BE- 4
aeid % be al -iHiiezziemenE II China. E7s
'iiliiI's % accaaHE fur tle money here On All
-auii also makes -l amir-zieIusnf- eut n 10 4
SENSE fecunrt sHiisel-zi emeHE Il "a al AIT az 4
I'm Fef-'nn ar appropriations by tie haiiae az
iiii1,sr r1riIn Gle isriasiirflGn u the Caurr
luH11u On Grim. Law Is5T
L Ne case had been prlsee.rlrl..t n China. A
liea Or cnIsigtlnn ar lciI1irsll S1uIf BE- bar
b Erua'.ciliinu here, amt -icg -erpz.
The szEapGnns an avar--Ilis.f
y q >lnIfi1 tlr 1r1asrIIralHz 4 : EIrt-
veli far defendant.
Eanuiuin, My u, Iss5