Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1885-01-27

49, NAaA 49, = 'ts
not favor the change. Il the question y
%, 20 vote.
Last week The Norway AipeTt,scr Ask.
"a q ooue.pondents 20 voice the senti-
uent q their section. in regard 10 the
question. Knowing that the Publisher Of
the Alrofi,,r favored the removal. ne
expected that bis correspondents would
lean TIA; way; bat an ovef~helmingly
large majority Of them rePor, the sen'i-
timent = against removAl.
We have reports from t-eniy-i~o
Correspondents. representing every section
q Oxiord Coaniy, in answer TO oar lei'efs
q inquiry, and ind them to correspond
very vel With the Adrertiser's rrpor's
No one can doubt AFTER reading and con-
par.ng these opinions. that the MOVE
men, will b. defeated BY large majority
II The question be submitted ~ March
meeting
There are thir,y-fvc towns and III
plantations in Oxford C0uniy. and The
r,por,s from these towns are condensed
a. foilows
Albany. supposed 70 favor the move
merit BY cutie a ma oriiy. has l5s voters
Anlovtr. 200 voters. majority opposed.
Bethel. 59T voter, very close. bat
probably q majority opposed
Bfownfcld. 32s voters, largely op-
posed.
Backfsli. 500 vo,er.. Almos, II not
quite unanimous IN opposition.
Byron. 50 voters. no rrPofi IN either
paper. bat private reports s'y the town
j. opposed
Can,oa. % voters. Almosi unAni-
moa,ly opposed. over 200 names on the
rcmons,rancc
nenmark. 30 voters. svenly divided
DS6eli. 26t voters. no BY ,~o-ihifd'
vote.
Fyebars. iio voters. majority oP-
posed. ,
Glsad. % voters. opposed By small
majority.
Grafton. q voters. no returns
Grcen~ood. 81 vo,ers. locke's Mus
people favor the change. Bat no canvas
las BEEN made 80 a. 70 tell how The town
s,ands
Hanover. 81 voters. claimed 10 b in
favor q removal BY the Adrerisrr'' cor
rcspondeat
Hartford, 2ae voters. almost unAni-
moasly opposed.
Hsbroa. 100 voters. nearly al 'isned
femons;rAnce
Hiram. SCI voters. nearly all 'isned
rrmonsirAnce.
Lowell. $40 voters, quite a nameer
signed petition. b., i u doubtful n The
town ~oald vote 10 change loca,ion.
Mason. 20 vo,srs. Almos, al opposed
% removal
Mex.oo. 100 voters. majority opposed.
Newry. no voters. no canvass
Nor~ay. cas- voters. claims 10 have
coo agaers q Peiit.on. ba, q rsnoa-
strAncs has quite = number u signers,
morr than enough 20 make IN The aggre
gate the ocns1. number q votefs.
Oxford. f05 voters. evenly divided.
Pns. 20 voters. cvcnly divided.
Peru. PSI voters. largely opposed.
Porter. 307 voters. Almos, unanimous
IN oPposii.on.
Roxbury. a. voters. nearly AL signed
rrmonstrAncc.
Rumford. 297 voters, ten 10 one against
removal. says the Aireriissr's core
spondsn,
Stoaeham ll9 voters. largely signed
petition. ba, closely divided on vote.
S,o~. iOg voters. 40 re,urns. bu, Ike
other western towns. doubtless opposed.
Sumner. 2s3 voters. almos, unanimous
IN opPosition.
sweden. lfi voter. no returns.
Waterford. $40 voters. opposed.
Woodstock. 2fs voters. largely oP-
posed.
Plantations no, heard from. With
such a showing. made BY correspondents
q one paper whose Publisher fsvors the
removal. add one whose Publisher = =
rsal estate owner on Paris Hill. 4 seems
that the petitioners can have bat little
hops q carrying the measure. al this time.
OuR Eas, Bethel eouesPondea, tells Of
a very sensible arrangement made in thA,
section Three School Districts have
united and built = modern school house
BY the union they arv enabled TO main
tain large school and provide suihcien,
schooling Coz their ehildren. II this good
judgment were universal or even common
there would no, be 80 much complaint
aboa, our Dis,rie; system. But the gen.
,ral practice o. making little districts Is
a nuisance. The terms are short and far
apart. money Is scarce 30 inferior teachers
mus, Be employed. the scholars few % no
spin, q emulation Is sngendered-,he
whole thing works bad. The only reA.
sou Why small districts are called for Is
that the children are saved some travel.
But this advantage Is generAlly ohse, BY
the al Disadvantages above enumerated
Ckildren who travel . mile or two 10
school appreciate their school and often
MAKE better progress. than those who have
everything brought close % their dOors.
THE Maias H,s,orical and GeAsaloy-
zeal Recorder Vol. I. No. 4. Is in hand.
IT, typographical appearance !. equal to
that o. any Of Is predecessor, being an
honor 10 b. ThurstOa & Co., printers.
The present number eontl los hfty-,wo
pages Of historical and biographical mat
ter. and = fine portal, Of Jane. o King
born May $. 1891.
OBITUARY.
MrsL Mary keens (nes RAssoal died In south
Paris. Ne. Nov. tl. $50
Tender and sally Interesting letters nom the
hereaved friends inf0rm the uritsr OF tnis.
that afer mouths - poor health and q fes
cur "hay- has Eone home. rive and = hall
years ago. I'm revival meetings near her home.
abe gave her heart AMI her lifs 20 her saviour
= Avorits with All Who knew Der, n vss an %.
casion ~ much rejoicing. The feu years she
has had In ZACH " serve Der Lord ana His
church have been years o. Christian living and
Influence. some four years since shs married
hro. Leslie y. keene. % south PARIS. nov Of
49, a. -. Al. =. -. "a -. =. -. -