Orleans County monitor. [volume] (Barton, Vt.) 1872-1953, 1885-02-16

the money can be traced to county and
district rings which have been Allotted by
the Legislature
ORLEANS COUNTY COURT.
The winter term of the county
court commenced on the Sd, inst,
and closed on the morning of the 9TH,
Judge Ross presiding. Hon. A. 2.
Button and Hon. j. C.. Oliver, as
sistant judges; c. w. Prouty, Esq,
states attorney; L. D. Miles. sher
iff. The following is list of the
jurors:
Albany, John A. Brown, c. +.
Rodgers.
Barton, Job Guild, VIM. Cheney.
Charleston, r. p. Stevens, Milo
Gay.
Coventry, r. Parker, E. H. Lath-
rop.
Craftsbury, John A. Morse, w.
P. Kaiser.
Derby, H. B. Crandall, Geo. F.
Dane.
Glover, John f. Wylie, N. A.
Smith.
Greensboro, G. n. Drury, John
| Wilson.
Holland, HI. H. Bryant.
Irasburgh, l.. S. Alden, Frank
Conner.
Jay, VIM. Ryan.
Lowell, VIM. f. Patterson, Irwin
Stevenson, Jr.
Morgan, Joel Williams.
Newport. Geo. r. Lane, Charles
Litchfeld.
Troy, Fl. HI. Lewis, Oscar Abbott.
Westfeld, Frank Bean. James HI.
Kenerson.
Westmore, II. B. Farmer.
There were three jury cases tried
The first was that of Sally Davis VS..
Geo. w. Jenness, to recover the
value of certain animals attached by
defendant on a writ issued by Garvin
Anderson, Mr.. Jenness being deputy
sheriff. The property was in posses
sion of Myron Dunn,s and the officer
believes and claimed that it was his.
The plaintiff claimed she owned the
property and brought proof and
chattel mortgage records TO prove
her ownership. Defendant claimed
that by subsequent mortgage and
other evidence of ownership the prop.
erty was shown to belong to Dunn
Verdict for plaintiff. Burke and
Crane for plaintiff, Circuit and Miles
for defendant.
The second case tried was that oil
Charles w. Wheeler VS.. ID. O. Par.
lin. This was an action to recover
a note which Parlin gave G. S. Page
of Hydepark which was to be paid in
lumber delivered at Barton Landing
Mr.. Parlin drew the lumber, but
failing to Immediately notify Mr..
Page, the lumber was attached by
Mr.. Parlin's creditors and sold. The
note remaining unpaid, one Darling in
in whose possession it fell went to
Parlin and demanded payment. Mr.
Parlin paid him So, as he claimed
''to get rid of him. The money
was endorsed on the note then just
ready to outlaw. Afterwards the
note was sold and drifted about until
it came into the possession of Mr..
Wheeler. The question before the
| jury was whether the S.. was an in
dorsement or not, as the endorsement
kept the note alive and made defend
ant liable. The jury decided that
the payment was an endorsement and
brought in for the plaintiff. Circuit
and Miles for plaintiff, O. HI. Austin
and w. d. Crane for defendant.
The third case was VIM. M. Fayel
VS.. J. O. Drew. This was to recov-
er balance claimed to be due on a
horse. Fayer sold defendant mare
for $50, twenty-five was paid down
and he claimed that he was to have
$50 more in year if the mare had q
colt. He stipulated that he was to
have the colt when it was four months
old for S25 if he wished to take it.
Defendant claimed that he was only
to pay the S25 in any event, and
that he was not indebted to plaintiff
The jury found for the plaintiff
S2S.65. Baldwin and Miles fol
plaintiff, Thompson and Cook fol
defendant.
The following is a list of the di
vorces granted:
Laura Story VS.. Henry j. Story
Cause, intolerable severity. Custod,
of minor child decreed petitioner.
Ella E. Hanson VS.. I'll. III. Hanson
Cause, willful desertion. Custody O
minor child decreed petitioner.
M. E. Barrett VS.. John M. Barrett
Intolerable severity. Custody O
minor child decreed petitioner.
Emma Jane Grow VS.. Orson A
Grow. Intolerable severity. Custo
dy of minor child, and alimony.
Emma Jondro VS.. Lewis Jondro
Deser.ion. Custody of minor child
Ann M. Judkins VS.. Joseph B
.Judkins. Willful desertion.