The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1885-10-11
sss L0CA. sEWS accord
BONES IN COURT CIRCLES,
bummary Of Street improvtments-Rs-
iisious Sotes-Cupid's Capsrs-ver-
diet of tho Jury Of Is4sest.
Prisoners Nslsased-Hcsi
Hststs Transfers. Etc.
TheNourts.


s Suit wea Instituted in the county
lourt yesterday by IL. d. Drexe, the
next friend o. Loais G. Schaokel, a
minor, sgaihet Frank DsBeoque, pro
bristor of. the Cslisssm theatre. rae
petition alleges that the defendant
claimed TO bs proprietor Of tho above
.aSnss theatre, that he awn6d the hsr
i1turen, atago sOenery, musical iU-
tca SCENTS, ihrnitErs, etc, aud that be
Aaa lease on tho building which hal
yet one year to ran. He represented
hat the profits ol the concern were
BOrmous aud that ne
foed9d q partner 20 help him manSg5
tae business. l5g his wil0s, blauuian-
aenta and Misrepresentation hg sac.
Needsd in sgogttng acbuackci to pur-
chase a half interest ia $40 concern,
for which he paid Si00 Gown and gave
notes for $500 more, Plaintiff Gyers
thIt that 30 sndAnG dots ~ own bao
property claimed ~ above. that he mas
no leas9 on the building; that the husl-
ness is Ast making nunay, and that
tao only profit ha hss ever rscaIVej
for his $40 was sad eIDenaucf.
Plaintiff c6Es th8t judgment he reL-
dered IN his favor aud against dfftoI-
ant for $500 and that tao alleged CON
tract between them he rcsolnded,
The cana OF William Vaughan w. tso
Texas Il Pacific Railway soiup2ny, de-
PENDANTS, and y. NJ, Bond d. Bro, inter-
venors, WIS tried IN tho county court
yesterday. The manner OF irving this
oAsa was somowhas novel. Vaughan
sued thu railway company Tor
S446.75, for boarding aection
shnds. Defendants Claim to
how paid 3. M. ROnd & Bro, $751; for
supplies furnished plaintiff, sns file
ihs amount 40 paid 1s an offset. The
Jury was Instructed 70 decide the
special Issues which, with lheir re-
apoctive rnswsrs, are given below:
!. What is the nnonnt tua William
Vaughan for boarding section hands
for March, 1851 Answer, $2l4.05
IL, What ia the amount due Willi,m
Vaughan FOR boarding section hlnns
for April, 1886, Answer, $23l70. 8.
How much did the Texas q Pacific
railway company pay to X, M. Bond &
Bra, on account Of William
Vaughan, cut of HE March
board blly Answer--$l7S15 4. what
amount doea William Vaughsn owe
to u nj. Hond Il Bro. for supplies for.
nishsd, not allowing any credit Tor
the money paid by the Texas It Pacific
Railway company Answor-$lsl.
o. Was tho amount paid by tho rsil.
way company 10 y. NJ. Bond & Bro.
paid under and by virtue of an sgree-
ment botwesn the plaintiff, the defend.
aut and b. NJ. Bond " Bro? Anawer--
Yes. o, Was tho amount paid by tho
railway company TO Is. M. Bond q Bra.
paid by virtue of spy custom aasented
TO by all the said psttissnNi acted ON
by Thorn? Answer, veg
SccordRace with tha &xlwer given
sbUyo the court oriered Judgment on
tered in favor Of tho plaintiff for
t2s475.
Ed Loo pleadedigutlty IN tho county
court yesterday TO tne charso of carry
Ing q pistol, and was iinsd $50 aud
coats.
CITY COURT.
The old Offenders are ltill vre,tlipg
with tho dengHe and consequently
didn't SHOW up yesterday morning in
tho mayors court. Whisky ID said to
bo turo cure for tho denguo aud IL ia
bat charitable 10 rl,DpOge Lh at ma nnl .