Daily Republican. [volume] ([Wilmington, Del.]) 1874-1890, 1885-11-28
FIT ! H E1
This Mornt-]


clock this morning. y
present. but no busins
until 10 O'Clock, wheu
charged BY the Chief
OF Mrs. Mary j. ValeJ
Il. Tantum.
HIS Honor said tina
ing his charge no deer
warn the jury that M
Influenced by sympat
against the plaintiff 81
In considering the cal
sight Of sex. aud all 81
ter, and be governed
evidence.
He then explained
the Legislature, VII
married woman TO br
own name, and said
the passage Of this act
could only bring a 8
and In the name of N
read the act passed m
object was TO put 1t 81
her husband, or attac
tors, to dispose Of her
The act passed In ii
she can hold real or
In her own name, wi
subject to debts contu
band, but are subie1
tracted by herself. 81
marriage.
The act ofl873 give
man the right TO brin1
name for wages, or OF
.Jprovides that she can
Independent of hsr hui
according To these act
. married woman is
and distinct from that
He then reviewed th|
,Iby the plaintiff, and cal
i tion In this case Ia her
whether she has any
this suit. She defends
Igoods by proving the I
made at th,
: was buying them for
the further claim Of 81
), services on the farm.
81 She also alleges that
duce twice q week TO
which is admitted, bu
/. PENDANT, with the alleg
..thing raised on the I
B him.
The defendant D,
; agreements for the diff
:. were on the farm, tina,
, made with Isaac 4
:! which the attorney for
jected to admitting a
i which the Court did az
:. the Jury should careful
=. These agreements Oh
} tine contracted with Il
work the farm, with h
stipulated sum, and
. oppose the claim OF
the ground that her VI
I the place, in accorda
agreement made betw,
and her husband.
ell Notwithstanding the
:. islature, Valentine hat
|, TO enter into an agreen
wife, as the husband Il
,.Jof the family.
Il In conclusion he sail
y not produced any eyii
she has any right 10
lCourt against the defel
,Iof the acts of the Legi
, The charge CONSUME
g. hour in its delivery,
81 tired at 10. IS O'Clock.
Il On motion OF Charlie
attorney for the resp0
vorce case OF Edward
la. Forrest, an order
flowing her $50 o montl
the suit Is pending, al
Isel fees, payable Jam
Eli ofiecker, Esq,, Mr.. !
in the case, announced
JRumford, Esq had bet
commissioner to lear
lease.
; Charles b. Lore, Eiq
1.-The respondent In tie
IJoseph ID. Billings, vs.
ings, requested that b,
to hle exceptions to I
commissioner.
I'll The application wa
I'M. Macallister, Esq,
libellant, and lie all
order giving the libel
lost Of certain proper
him, subject TO the 8
costs and other expeni
a. out of employment 90
He stated that somt
defendant was about
IAmerica on business,
house for 81. 900, ali o
!. his wife, with the ex'
n he took away with hiI
He alleges that the
money Was squandert
dent, on the man VIII
she lived In adultery
sence. After the I
pretty fully discussed
cd Mr.. Lore antil 10
morning to Ale his OK
The case of Elizabel
istratoz Va. the =. "
company, and the thl
and Elizabeth Lynn
81 were, on the apple
y IGrsy, Esq, continuet
these suits are brough
Id ages incurred by the
=. railroad accidents.
L. g. Bradford,
ICourt ii they were re'
sion on the applies
Bird, ESQ, attorney
rel & Ohio Telegraph Col
e. on the Delaware an
n, graph s. Telephone o
cause why o writ OF I
not be granted. comp
,gIpany to place o telsl
in the Office Of the am
The decision Was
lChief Justice, and SUI
ford's N o.ion TO al
land denies the applies
Idamus. The jury In
were still out at l o'c