The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1885-05-12
Abel Leonard VS. James P. Fisher, note

u. t. ,
defendants file joint answer and also file
motion 10 dismiss suit for want of bond for
costs.
In re. jos Barrett, Geo. p. B. Jackson,
assignee, assignment, John Montgomery
appointed commissi ner to examine az
counts and rrpOrt at this term Of court.
Bette Lackey VS.. Charlts L. Lackey, di-
vorce; p:ainiiff makes proof of publication
Charles Psrson, trustee, VS.. Truman l..
Vets, Ell C ment; oe'endani files answer.
VIM. smith VS.. Sedalia Brewing cOmps.
nv, equity; defendant files answer.
Barbara Hoffmeister VS. A. {. Sneed, &C
count; defendant has leave to file answer
In vacation.
Josephine Williams VS.. J. s. Williams,
divorce, cause docketed, petition filed; de-
PENDANT enters appearance. leave TO file
answer on or before May 10th.
Urias Gordon VS.. the city of Sedalia,
appeal motiou to retsx costs sustained
and costs OF appeal and costs in this court
ordered taxed sgaint plaintiff the appel
liant.
Abel Hoover ct al, VS.. i. y. Baker, notes !;
defendant files affidavit and canse continued
al defend ant costs.
Jason Chamberlain VS. Jesse L. Heard ct
al, attachment; motion for judgment on
pleadings taken up for hearing, heard and
finding for plsintiff.
The defendant asks leave to amend his
plea to the granting of which the plsinIif
objects, leave granted and plaintiff objects,
amended plea 10 abatement fled, motion
overruled ind defendant objects,
Maggie Lower VS.. Missouri Pacific Rail-
way company, damages; defendant files
motion TO r., quire plaintiff to submit 10 an
examination motion heard and granted
aad Drs. Z. Z. Evans, Scott and Bronson
appointed to make such examination.
A. p. McLgchlin VS.. Austin P. Snsed,
contract, dismissed by plaintiff.
John Murray VS. SalIie A. Rhodes ct al,
appeal, plaintiff files amended snswer.
F. ID. Bronson VS. w. F. Burcham, sc-
count, continued on application of plain
tiff at bis cost,
Morris Sullivan VS.. First Natio ,al bank,
damages, plaintiff files amended answer.
George L. Smith Middling and Purify
ing company VS.. B. S. Rembsugh, note,
plaintiff files motion for judgment on
A. Meyer & Co. VS.. III. w. Wood ct al |
mechanics lien, plaintiff files reply 10 an
sWer of defendant.
Tbos. Ellis g. Co. VS.. VIM. Dugsn, at |
tachment taken up for final hearing and |
Judgment for plaintiff for SlS5.
Aultman q Taylor company VS.. VIM. |
Duniee ct al, notes, dismissed as 10 defend |
ant Kenntd ard judgment by default and \
final for plaintiff against defendant Dunfee |
on first count for Sl42, and on the second |
count for S6l0, total Judgment, S752 with S
per cent. interest.
Same VS. w. .. Means ct al, notes, dis
missed ss to defendant Boyd ard judgment
by default and final for plaintiff against
defendant Mears for S342 with per cent.
interest.
A. J. Haverly VS.. Phillip Wareham,
note, judgement by default and final for
plaintiff for S256 go with per ceDt in
erest.
j. S. Mcdowell VS.. O. FL. Coe ct al note,
defendant files answer.
Aul man Miller q Co., VS.. Geo. w.
Williams ct al, note, smissed as 10 de-
endant Clark and judgment by default
and final for plaintiff VS.. defend mt Viii
Jams for $3.50 with 10 per cent interest.
Virgil n. Harris ct al. VS.. w. j. Harris
It al, partition, defendants Overton Har-
rs and Macon Brsdy enter their appear
D..
De made a party defendant, motion sus.
aimed and Sabra b. Harris enters her APP
lesrInCe.
Barstow & Whitelow VS. E. T. Baldwin,
appeal from assignee, assignee and con-
ignees waive notice OF appeal and enter
heir appearance.
Dora 4. Ksgley VS.. John B. Peffiey,
preach OF promise, defendant files snswer
o petition.
Cyrus Newkirk VS.. G. Galbreaih, gar
lishee of J. w. BushoDg dockeIed and dis
missed by plaintiff.
Same VS.. Geo, P. B. Jackson, same
cause, docke;ed and plaintiff files inter-
ogatOries..
Same VS.. Citizens National Bank, same
'ause, same entry.
Elizabeth Buckley, VS. B. X. Greenwsy,
notion for writ for possession, motion for
writ filed and writ ordered to issue.
The attachment case of Jason Chamber
ain VS. Jesse F. Heard ct al, was concluded
md given to the jury, who returned YER
lict for the defendant and the attachment
vas ordered abated at the cost of the plain
if and his securities.
The only other jury Gaze called was that
Il
Railway company, In which the plaintiff
eeks to recover damages for injuries re-
eived by stepping from train while ii
vas in motion. The case promises to be
utterly contested and quite an array of
egal talent has been retained on both sides.
jury was empanreied and qualified and
he attorneys tegau skirmish for FositioD
With cross fire of motions tor rulings and
when court adjourned until
o day,
Following are the other entries on the
locket:
Jasper Williams VS.. John Shackleford
by agreement at defendant
osts.
t1iram T. Thornton VS.. j. ID. and J. w.
v arsh, appeal Continued by consent.
Ruskem Gerratty d Co, Us. w. NJ.
Moore, rote and account; taken up for
inal hearing, heard and final Judgment