The semi-weekly miner. [volume] (Butte, Mont.) 1882-1886, 1885-10-03
THE LEGAL LOG.
yerivss Proceedings in the District
Court.

The following were this proceedings in the
District Court Wednesday:
John O'Connell VS.. William GuedelhOefer.
A Jury having been waived by the respect !
i've parties. the case is tried before the
court without a jury and taken under adj
visement.
Silas F.. King VS., Lewis Cooper ct al.
This. cause was given to the Jdry at II
o'clock. The jury had not agreed at a iate
hour last night.
Silver Bow Mining and Milling Company
VS., Thomas NJ. Lowry, The jury IN this
case brought in a verdict for the plalntlh
for 81. -.
John Caplice ct al. VS.. James A. Maxwell
ct al. The default OF the defendants for
failure to answer was ordered entered and
the case was referred to Reuben L. Davis
as commissioner to compute the amount
due and report the same to the court.
James Sharpe VS.. James A. Maxwell ct
al. Same order as in case of Caplice VS..
Maxwell.
AlonzO G. Young vs.. George W. Irwin,
sheriff, etc. By consent Of parties in open
court this case is continued for the term.
Hermidas Goodwin VS.. Pierre Demmer ct
al. The default of defendants for failure to
answer was ordered entered.
James A.. Talbot ct al. VS.. Parrot Silver
and Copper Mining Company. The defend
anus OleE ~ dAlOW Pld1iiC1A6 w UnnO I" "a .
cree by consent for the sum of $40, and for
the equitable relief by Injunction as prayed
for in the complaint herein. and for costs.
ia accepted by plaintiff and the order was
accordingly made.
James A. Murray VS.. Montana Copper
Company. By consent, a judgment for
plaintiff for 81 damages and costs and Tor
perpetual injunction as prayed for in plain
tiff g complaint was ordered entered.
Hart VS.. Butler. This cause was, on
/ motion OF plaintiff, dismissed without pre-
| JUDGE as to bringing another action.
Charles A. Nuss VS.. II. +. Hammond.
This cause occupied the attention of the
court until noon. Verdict for plaintiff for
$500.
Butte Hardware Company VS.. William G.
| Price ct al. On motion it was ordered that
the default of the defendants Tor failure to
answer be entered and cause referred to
Reuben L. Davis to compute amount Que
and report.
Levy Siebenhauer vs. Joseph Mobile.
| Plaintiff, by consent, is allowed to file
amended complaint, and defendant given
! ten days in which to answer.
| Missouri Crabb VS.. James H. Crabb. The
appearance of C. ]. Walsh as associate
counsel for plaintiff is ordered entered.
Thursday the District Court. Judge Gal
braith presiding, transacted the following
business.
William Owsley VS.. William Warfield:
demurrer withdrawn and defendant given
till Friday to answer,
Samuel A. Carey vs. Maxwell & Price;
default OF defendant entered and cause re-
ferred to the clerk to ASSESS the damages.
Lee Mantle vs.. A. NJ. Hotter; Joseph
Chapleau, Della E.. Nadeau, and Joseph
Nadeau allowed to file their complaint.
Eliza w. Jackson VS.. L. D. Jackson,
divorce; proof of publication OF summons
offered; default of defendant entered and
cause referred to John Madden to take tes-
tiinnny and report the facts.
i'll. Calvert VS.. Eugene D. Sullivan; court
iinuts for plaintiff.
Thomas C. Porter, administrator. vs.. J.
r. Clark, executor; jury waived, caused
submitted to court, and arguments to be
submitted IN Friday.
Stephen w. Putnam VS.. Thomas Wal
lace ct AL; trial concluded and court finds
for plaintiff Judgment for $500 and in
terest,
Silas F. King VS.. John johnson (tried
Wednesday); jury disagreed and dis
charged, after being out tw%enty-four hours.
James Renshaw vs.. James King. The
regular panel OF jurors having been ex-
hausted, d special venire was ordered and
a Jury of twelve selected and sworn. The
witnesses for the plaintiff were examined,
after which the counseifordefendant moved
for a non-suit, which was overriled.