Daily Republican. [volume] ([Wilmington, Del.]) 1874-1890, 1885-11-23
{ IF I H EDIT


~ pOfbDf buft
The November term AZ II
Court opened this m~yn,r,
) nstice ComePys and A".ss.
houston on The hcnca ri
large attendance O. a,,e,nsJ
a a, number OF other ,stn
me names o; the genera
called and al answtrfJ u
rue parliamentary cs ''rl M
and of the IA cases va
81 passed, 10 rerortel
marked for trial.
The Court imuedia,Ty j
business, and had a lar
the case Of Isaac i. Nh
Mary J Valentine v I'D
tum. with Levi c. B,fl ii
plaintiffs, and CAar,.a
for the defendant, II
by MI. Bird, Is an s.'.yt \
70 recover a cons!le,al 4
the defendant, thri.G n
lows In 1873 the rAuuel
farm in Brandywine u h
by Henry DUPONT, aulr- /
their personal propeit5 sad
sold.
I Previous TO the "a \
called en- Mr.. DuPor' srl }
wou Id become responsp.e /
LOT the farm, and On H. tay|
stated to those in,,at,ea.farsI
there Tor the purpose ,ttl
tprc perty for Mrs. V4il n
account OF ihia s.at
reirained from bidd.is \
enabled 10 buy the mn "a
was valued at tl2r
low fgute.
The plaintiffs contl 4
the farm until Decsli i.
Dr. Tantum, without AZ d
them I'll and reta.reG W. l
he afterwarr su.d f., Il \
lclairned that durir. u
tplainti!is were on tn la.ml
uIe supplied the Doc
milk, eggs, butter. =
farm producs, for Win.
no pay whatever, AID .t.|
brought to recover . ~ |
for MIR. Valentine, AZ
his wife. for the tou, sci l
Ion tie farm, with lutt |
They also claim tar All 4
value of their goods t..'a
Dr. TantuM paid ~ D..
iprica at which be a. theI
tero 81 from 1919 u r. |
he would show Ia. DE 4
iiered to settle tue T.
the plaintiffs Sl2j0, a. 4
refused ,oitrrel 81 500 a. 4
land that by 30 doisst4 4
their claim,
Isaa,'. Il Valentine was
II and, but before IL Va.
Lore objected TO his ED 4
ground that az his STE VI
o4t.d party, AID 70 4
-vidence could not w ~
This point vs. G.s 4
Il time, whr1 The Cg,' 4
T THAT the evidence c.g II
n Mr., Bird then wl'lt.tA
ia the rema ming eleven wenl
land the case cuit.raA' VI
standing thai tlr ria!
the coats alreai;v iu-l
ct. Mr.. Lore val! tlf ~ Il
70 anxious Z" 20 lheat
10 Mary j valentine
q tun. Mr.. bird ~
plaintiff, sid he So -
the nanAes Of Tie VI"
g veral " 70 HsF4
plaintiff dlt 10 A,.'Ns
ments were l-''l'7' ~
D. In the cases q "a q
Emily G RaTiho'oiif"
Tn. Lee ( yso.atr "
son ard " lam il--'.f-s
lHoffecker, ladgmeh'
the plaintiffs. Il
,. A jury Ua. draw
!" Thomas Wiliamtof
Yetter was taken q. q
Harrington for tie
,c' Emmons for ne delt'.'' On,
% This is an action % ie'el
~ OF a horse, with tsna-'
which the detebdAll 80
in 1882, with a %a.iaa
sound, but wnlch wa
DFi to have rihFo"'ie'
owl The price paid was .
Williamson gave his Iig9 !,
days after the pia!ht'n =
horse he SHOVE sigii'
upon Yetter & atteii .c1
the matter he told "
= 1.-THE animal 10 a blaes = =. -
Old have her shod, When "
10 = 1.-The lameness wonld d !, y
u when the blacksmith
arsl horse he pronounced ~
.lbone, and npon 1ettti
nod of this fact he proui'r,.
.,ib1ek, but as he dii nj
III the ma'tef f.,
inc horse to him, when y
1t back
' ~, He after wa-ds co.lft
lof the note, and tie
aid horse ahou. seven M w.
.e1 ha Moved a snrgeaH
'o' thing possible, he u 'l
animal, and was .
Ito sell IL for a tIiis'l.t
l.w loss TO himself
a. Thomas Williamsoh y
ure testified to the fact oil . ,
.,b and that Yetter SAID
vii horse was perfectly = s -.
.bie be no sale. ara 'ho -
InIat RptDIe CUIsht'