The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1885-10-16
The C1nrts.

In the city court yesterday norning
the following individuals received
justice and equity to the fun
amount of the cost they contributed (:
John McDuff, lave Johnson, d. G..
Parry and James Doyle paid So each 70 {,
the privilege accorded every Ameri-
oan cltiz0n nn the Fourth of Jnly,
OF getting glorlously full. S. G. An
ders0D, tor obstructing tho street, was
dismissed, while for using had Ian
guage, Franz O'Donnell WAS fined SO,
and George Frances WAS tincd $40.
IN THE COUNTY COURT
yesterday morning the ctso OF j. NJ,
Justice vs.. the receiver of the Hous-
ton Il Texas Central railway came M
for vial, but it was adjourned until
next Tuesday. The court then went
grinding away on matters of no iu-
terest To the public
IN JUSTICE KENpALL'S
court the only case before his honor
was thai of J. j. Ganwyler, charged
with disturbing tho peace. He was &C
quilted by Il jury, ana the court picked
up his teeth, put on his overcOat and
put out tor home.
ASSIGNMENT or CASES IN DISTRICT
COURT.
Assignment OF jury civil cases In the
district court for Two weeks beginning
Monday. October 10.
IL w. JONES District CIork.
1913 John Brown vs. Thomas Fiyron.
III Srigsby We. -owle
20)l Walcoman, STAG te co vs. u. b, War
1913 i ] wald1en vs. W. J. Keller.
AlI Mary NJ. Cameron ct al. VS.. j. 81
Thurman ct al.
1868 Francis FOX Va. Silas Read
$500 i. Hcaton VS.. JaC. h w, Davis OF al.
3'2l j. III, Sherard VS.. James h. Barklsy
tia
flu ct al.
3SlS Dallas Compress company VS.. Hous-
ton d Texas Central Railroad COM
pHnN.
1910 State and city VS. j. N. Ogden Ell al.
$3.50 August Weber vs. John Wonderliek.
Has w. III. CASTOR VS. j. Ia Burton
1850 Daniel Whitfield OF al. Vi. Thomas
Whitfield.
ll5l CIR or NJ, Boyd VS.. Houston & Texas
Central Railroad company.
All Henry Rider VS.. Houston q Texas
Central Rg:iIoad company.
IDS John Naples VS.. Texas Trunk Rail
4el5 Il. IL Motley ct nj. vs.. city Of Dallas.
4s2l j j. Good VS.. Texas Il Pacific Rail-
road company.
SEA 4. Ferguson 4 Son VS.. Schneider &
Davis
1908 q W. Parker VS.. w. @. Howard ct al.
1905 Dillon 4 Barrow Va. Cleveland 81 n
iSl0 Frank ferguson VS., Clinton n McGin-
mis-,
1893 w. +. Thompson Va. Texas Trunk
Railroad company
1865 stephen Moore VS. Daniel Carver.
iill a. T. boyleS VS. sam Hunncut
iilj Louis Il, Hickman Va, Texas < paciac
Railroad company,
ii.o II II. Smyrl vs., Texas Trunk Railroad
company.
The following cases ara assigned Tor
the week beginning October 10, 1855:
iii2 Lewis, 4 Ferguson VS.. James II,
Swindels.
ii36 Phllllps n Barnes VS. Chicago. Texas
4 Mexican Central Railroad com
pany.
ii66 H. II Laws vs.. A, p. Cornelius ct nj
ii9j W, G, Patty VS., Isaac Thompson etal
ills \. d Rust VS.. A. c Rust.
ass Julia Keller ct al. Va. William Mills
i,.5 I'D hayes va. j. NJ. Gross.
1926 j. u. Simpson VS.. Texas Trunk Rail
road company.
asa v, NJ. Tiliman Va. Kahn 4 Campbell.
i5i5 J. h Filge aid ct nj. vs., Lcnmgn
Field.
i5,6 William Doran va II. g. Davis.
ttto lun Il. Whitevs y, Nj. Berry
800 Samuel Beck Va i. II Page,
4U)i =. Sellnhaut Va. Gulf, Colorado &
SANTA Fe Railroad compn- y.
iUia wentworth Manning Va. a y, Whls-
sen.
is6a samuel Brovnwen VS.. II. O Putnam
te9 ]. a. Quin VI. NJ Douahuc.
io.l Henry Loeb VS. Samuel Frlodlander
leS q. a kea'ing VS., John Sioue
i'e' :. q, = ewart vs.. Texas n Pacific Rail