Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1885-02-03

NNAAN'f AaN'A "
The removal q our County Baildings
hts called forth through the DrNocHAr,
many communications. embracing the
Gains and views Of those upon both
sides Of the question. and suppose IN
this correspondenoe there Is intended 10
BE- conveyed fair aad truthful state
ment q public opinion. bu, IN your
Published oorrcsPondence from Wet
PARIS IN your Jas, paper there = a mis-
conception q the sentimeni here n IA
deed your oorrssPondeni s resident q
West Pafis-ths correspondent says
"thcfe i difference q opinion smong
people in regard TO L.. and i 'inehned
u think vote would no, Be favorable
o. removar-esryins the impression
that a d.fcrence exists here and implied
majority only against removal. Nov
The fact IL. there Is no practical dlhefenof
and the sentiment IN this vicinity Is
unanimous sgains, Il With the exception
u oas man ard he j. under elnoern Of
mind and j. NJ, % BE- counted
There are many reasons 20 my mind
MY a removal. a. this time. should not
BE- made. many q Which have been
presented. but there are points Of night
ard Justice ard public sSigeneies 10 BE-
pfcssnied and properly settled before
making any change.
Among the claims BY ihose IN favor
II removal. are. Il viii bald up and
ircrase the property valuation sroand
~terc they shah be located. hence IN
crease che value q TAXABLE PfoP-riy,-
and asain ii j.. a. one gentleman from
Greenwood told me. TOO bad % b drag
sei "a % Paris Hill % DO bis public
business wien b. . - much neArrr and
more convenient % the intended locaiion
a maa too ~bo never bad a la- su'i
in hs hfs which speaks vel fof him
ani never ~as "a jury but once and
nay never Dc again, and yet "a his pub
d. coayenienoe removal should take place
~iils the lrf-rcs oa in f1ro % pay 90
.lch rmovl would be- more than The
extra trouble and expense % - % Paris
Hil for hi. reasonable life liability thus
sho~ins hoe nea vii ~ from the sub
line O. The ridiculous poin'.
Are we o. BE- hood~inked and believe
that The costs q god set Of County
Ba.ldings Or cd Oxford vii no, exceed
,he sun q $40 600. Gnl believe The
rers nfs q some ~ho circulated the
petitions ia removal and Who ASSURED
GOD citizens q average valuation Of
rropcfty AL average tAX payers that To-
lO cent. they would pay all the yearly
tax they woa,d b. liable % On account 81
such removal. o. Arc We % exercise
good Judgment and FAIR Discretion, and
u ~c 90. 90 ~ili SO that the doaoling
1p on ola r. r. shares we're never mote
likely THAI an increase % $4,000. o.
500. 900. O. complete such bailtings'
To The ,o,ers IN one AID al. lei us
fgurc. Pars pays abogi one tenth q
The County ,ax Anl cur proPof,ion would
b. ~i,h these fgufes from eight . ten
thousand dollar. 10 yoa want 10 pay
,hi. f,r looks and exirAvagance. iof u D.
no,hins else. unls.. the public conven-
isnce demands removal. a. oai present
tu.iiings are ccnven.cnt and IN so0a
condition and the public eonvcaience
doe no, call. IN NY Jatsmen, 20 TO-
cat.on so Gar from Posi-Othce o. Hotel,
- r. n. S,a,ion. 10 the question u
convenience "a The saints a. Norway
and South Pans. dd yoa ever stop 70
think that when citizen ~Gs a. Nor
way. or half wsy % south Pans. q va
Cd farther o. dnvc cato Pafis Ill and
bach. than Il ~as Coz c.tifen ~ Pans
Hll. ofacitfea from The eastern part
II cur Coaniy driving over. % BY he
Hill % ~ 90 Norway And back. neither
lrs the peoPlc any better o. more law
atiding m either u these place. than On
PAr.s Hi,l A. % The increase 81 value
Ia property where heated. vii NJ, that
incfease b. made a. the expense q
pfupcfiy valuation ~ fAfis I'm. Nnef.
ne ci,.rens have erected % enjoy snd
planted % reap. Such narrow Vie~
d, cause Coz removal Is worse % the peo-
pc 81 Psrs Hli than downright rob
berry and I cannot coincide therein. and
further the otly real claim Coz removal 20
BE- biad.ng On the people q Oa'ofd
Coua,y j.. does the public oonSenienee
demand 10. and say no. and vii vote
no. and this j. The opinion held here and
VAL b. 90 expressed.
Are no, the people q South Pans al
losing Norway the Use q their tngefs
% pgn Nor~ays ehesnuis oai q the
m, for II The Cosniy Baiidings arr %
be- locaied on the line u X X. for
conwnience. plant them On Railroad a.
south Pans and thea Ne can make = TEA
sonAble claim for Railroad convenience,
bl, a. Or me. I sAy. With the fine seen
cry beautiful shade trees and healthy
Reality; around which cluster those
memories o. the past. With oar Cogn,y
free from burdens and TAXATION o. debt,
am CO.. The Pans Hill location s,ilL