The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, 1885-10-28
Supreme Court-Oclober Term.
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JUDD.

tuesday, October 9th.
The King VS.. All Fook, forging and
uttering. The defendant was arraigned
on the indictment and pleaded not
guilty. The case was tried before a
foreign jury who rendered verdict OF
guilty, by direction of the Court. The
defendant was sentenced to imprison-
ment at hard labor for one year and pay
a fine of $50 and $15 % costs. The At
torney General and Major Rosa for the
Crown, J. A. Magoon for defendant.
j. Austin VS. c. Michiels, trover. The
case was continued for the term on
plaintiffs motion, he to pay 81 80 costs.
J. Austin and F. NJ Hatch for plaintiff,
l.. A. Thurston for defendant.
Nakuaimano VS.. Achoi, assumpsit and
damage. The case is continued for the
term on plaintiffs motion. Kinney &.
Peterson for plaintiff, Ashford & Ashford
for defendant
Mrs. R. Love ct al. VS.. George Caven-
agh, assumpsit. Appeal from Inter
mediary Court. The defendant was
called three times and failed to appear.
The Court dismissed the appeal. W. A.
Whiting for plaintiff.
G.. 7. Gulick, Minister of Interior, VS.,
George S. Harris, assumpsit. Jury
waived. Default was entered on October
18th. The Court ordered judgment for
plaintiff for $3.50. Major Rosa, Deputy
Attorney General, for plaintiff
IN CHASIBERs-BEFoRE JUSTICE PRESTON.
The Onomea Sugar Company VS..
Franklin H. Austin and Herbert c..
Austin. F. NJ Hatch for plaintiffs,
Ashford & Ashford and L. A. Thurston
for the defendants. The Court heard the
argument of counsel on a motion filed by
defendants to dissolve the temporary in
junction issued in the case, and denied
the same on the ground that it is not
shown by an affidavit that said defend
ants are not the servants of the Onomea
Sugar Company. Further hearing was
suspended until next Thursday morning.
when the defendants will put in an
affidavit to the effect that they are not
nor have they been the servants of said
Onomea Sugar Company.
MR. JUSTICE M'CULLY, PRESIDING.
w. c. Parke and II. r. Macfarlane,
assignees of Aiau, bankrupt, VS.. Lau
ING. W. A. Whiting for plaintiffs, w.
/ r. Castle for defendant. This case was
heard after several postponements, and
argued by counsel, after which it was
submitted. This is case in equity to
set aside deed of conveyance from one
Aiau, now deceased, well known as an
extensive rice planter in Eva, on this
island, to one Lau ING, the defendant in
this case, who is a brother of said Aiau.
The complaint alleges that the deed is
fraudulent and void ON the ground that
said defendant knew of the insolvency
of said Aiau at the time of its execution.
On the other hand the defendant sets up
that he had no knowledge whatever of
the insolvency of his brother. His
Homer took time to consider the merits
of the case.
In the matter of the estate of John
Russell, deceased. Kinney & Peterson
for the petition. Mrs. Anna Long pre-
scented the will, together with a petition
praying that said will be admitted to
probate. The Court appointed Wednes-
day, December Is, 1885, as the day for
hearing the petition and will. The
devisees under the will are the officiating
clergyman at the funeral service, Ella
Mann Russell, daughter, of Philadelphia,
State of Pennsylvania, and Mrs. Anna
Long. The latter is named as the execu-
trix who is to act without any bond.
The estimated value of the estate is
81 900, consisting OF cash, book accounts
and law library.