Richmond dispatch. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1884-1903, 1885-11-17

Nf
pear sir-As I told YOU I shall not per.
sonaIly answer through the newspans~s
Mayor tauiugtun limitations to the pub
10 what will - the gruunts uf his s.to o.
toe resolution authorizing the pay msnt ~
| your bin in the tluNerius case. write You
TIE fO wing hrcsu~e you think fha' tho
| statements maie by the Mayor might hay.
some elect upon some OF the me ntier. Of
The ems Council The saturday e.e-
uIua ON which took charge Of the rase VI.
VIII suggested mat hn and J should sec
/ sou. rs tuu were working in fne csse aut
/ ascertain what eN ldrnce Nou had. We d 4
| so Tue follow iug Monday. after the cxafnI-
/ nation was Waived In the lower court, /
81 sou fn Aeui our ~ our operatives 90
! work .n king william and Ming aud q 1crn
! counties some time fhlu The uekf lew
1nNs sou fo.d me- ~ tn tnt natan' of your
/ author '1 tn Wutk zoe fne cHrr. luu aIso
! ssktd me- i1 en vill yuu tp ses the Mayur
| and learn from nIn whether yuu .nfrertiY
urtrfs' Unf Nnur position A. Z vas husyf
/ to.i sou e.d uoi sec Oh" nercs'iS ~
l our lu'nf Rni TOLD Nou That f the
/ Mstof had 'sid what ,ou hEi stated
Z 10 wUud hardly HH fH stand un fo
f Nnu 80 unf soru rnn1fnnt ~
/ '.s' nn' vHs f"" .Hs n.'' sl'ri Fr
/ al. Hn Hu. No mon.
49, NHf.s. me NafHf nl Hn.r
] sfr.. fi. ...II H.af .f I..
N. aI I.H....H IIr Mafu aIafII
/ tUal Hr ID. % auihof' lrh ,nn fn snrk lee 100
I ca.r RIfn 'ht understand nH fhaI 5000 ef".f
rut fo .,.,k in hIm fr PAYMENT ani WIff
f.e fufhei un''rfa auf mat Ne hai 100
/ IHvfI lH N|nI fHI I.Hu. I N.f fIH ps ffIr.u.
/ on f.. mooney a. sa.i nIHf Yuu wluIf
] nave |H fIusf fn fNF i.uu.I IIf faFmruf.
! o. f.ffI.r sIa',i ffRi Hs 'n fht a1loun' uf
/ '"r I Hf v"..i .ninfer anN hNI mat 4
/ ...u.f saN Wnsff.I
/ I-au h.m ars.u SOM. tImr DURING AMI
| nI Nat ant fu|i H that 5000 hsf sTsnf aIi
] .fNtuI Wuu,t u ilr rtp"n-e attendanf
/ Nf"n 'Nr M"h'nf " N.hl .lffHilf h th"
/ counties ahutr named AMI needed $50 g.
I kl.U f.Nf operative fuWn There longer H.
/ declined fo my the money fnNuu mot 90
] fHp ground f.Hf son hat nnf fHren author.
/ It..I In nufk 100 fHr rss. huf pu thr Ernunf
/ tnsf no uudrrs' audIns was thst you we're
] not fn 'u"k fn him fuf payment uut u the
+ sfrtef. -rr, .ce fund aud hat hr would not
I ret fIo nrtuuni mixed up win your hil.
i Nut De- agreed to give me "a warrant fur that
amount tn be- u,'i as Thought best. or
/ ruuee got 10 fur you and turned 10 over Ia
,ou. / don thInk thai ins Mayo had any
/ dlncury iu und'rsianding to whom tho
I warrant would gu.
AgaIu Anrrthc ras,. 4, .r inen Z b. -. 7 nre-
pared q letter, addtr--ct to th" Gify toun-
en-. asking the IaN Nment 20 your hili which
. aecon PANIED the letter. hcforc -snilug
/ the letter aud hill 10 thr Council / showed
4 them 10 the Mayor. iic r'ad over your bIli.
/ Tho only objection tO % that he Int mated
Z was whether son ought tO be paid bDin
J NOur expenses ana I'r dirM. | told nina
; that / thought yOu ought To be-, An \ ex-
7 p.alnrd to him why thought ~. do not
. remember his language hut in substance
T he eN pressed himself satisfied with NY eX-
p'anatlop. He further said on that Occa-
' : on that he could not endorse n then. a. Q
would not he proper To do SO. m lt would De
referred 10 him for his signature " the
i Council passed Z. tut said in subst ,nce that
when 10 came to him he would approve u.
Again: BE fore publishing my brief adj
Nocatiug the payment of your claim rad
10 him That Tart Of II which narrated the
conversation had when Mr.. Wit was pre-
sent. and also that part Of 10 referring to
the payment Of the $50. Ny recollection
now II That he only asked that / woald
make verbal change In that part Of 10 tina,
referred TO the payment of the $50. Inc
change was made and was published as he
had approved IL. II was In substance what
fhaVe stated above.
Idid not employ YOU. when came into
the case | found you In IL. having hcen
authorized by the Mayor 10 work In ~.
simply made use Of your assistance, which
YOU rendered faithfully and efficiently.
Very truly,