Lewiston teller. [volume] (Lewiston, North Idaho) 1878-1900, 1885-07-16
CLARK ; judgement for plaintiff.

taiu~eii Judgement Tor plalntiifs.
-. VIM. NJ. plympton vs. Todd &
Sweet judgement for plaintiff.
25. John Burke vs. A. N. Williams
Judgement for plaintiff.
=. John Burk vs. d. 7. Chambers /;
default and decree entered.
~. John Bark VS. ingla and Sutton;
settled.
IS. Frank Taplin KS j p Kester; con
tiuucd,
90. Halls Safe and Lock Co. VS. j.
I. AIS; judgement for defendant.
80. j. G. Shissler and Go. VS. d. W..
Vining verdict for plaintiff.
81. Il Grostein VS. G. N. and G.
Hollister; settled.
30. Il. Levi VS. Garrett Van Horn
ct al; Judgement for plaintiff.
So. Louis Tanssig VS. II. W. and I.
Little; settled.
81. Louis Levy VS. Ncz Perez co. );
dismissed.
35. N. w. McGee vs. J. A. Fansler
and r. II. Beeman; judgement for
plaintiff
SO. r. H. Barton VS. Floyd and
Sherman; judgement for plaintiff.
81. c. johnson VS. A. Meyers ct al. ;
judgement for plaintiff.
| SO. Il. J. Parker VS. A. +. Parker !;
continued
80. VIM Evans VS. Nez Perez co. !;
dismissed.
40. I. Il. Dawson VS. W. D. Robbins
ct. al; judgement for plaintiff.
Al. G. johnson VS. Il DAVIS settled.
/ ~. c. Miller VS. B. H. Vaughn and
T. Sampson settled.
i 43. Newell Night VS. Harriet Night
| decree Of divorce granted.
A. Frank Bros vs l.. p. Wilmot
judgement for plaintiff.
IS. S. S. Davis VS. A. 4. and Sarah
Lieuellen judgement for plaintiff and
decree.
46. Thos. Humphrey VS. T. B. Muir
ray verdict for plaintiff.
AZ. Matte Iceberg VS. John Lieberg
decree denied for want Of proper service
4S. A. r, Fink vs. H. CLARK. d. S
Baker, j. F. Boyer and W. W. Baker
w. W. Baker discharged as defendan
t and decree granted as per prayer.
, 40. The Second National Bank o
! Colfax VS. Taylor and Shelter; judge
ment for plaintiff.
r so. Weisgerber Bros. N. 7. and W
Hyatt; settled.
81. Mccain, Wash and Co. vs. "
I. Cox !; judgement for plaintiff.
I, 81 W. j. Mcconnell and Co., VS. A
!, A. Lieuellen continued.
e SO. John Buchanan vs Il. G. Eishe
): Judgement for defendant.
81. Baptiste Esculi VS. Eugene ,
. Bonhore; Judgement for plaintiff.
IS. Petition in insolvency of Euger
s. Bonhore; notice to creditors publisho
and complete
So. d S Baker vs. John Peterso
and Samuel Moore Judgement for plai1
tiff.
81, Baker and Boyer VS. Gilbert J
Thompson judgement for plaintiff.
IS, w B Martin vs. Il Il jerome
continued.
50. Fieisehner, Meyer and Co. ,
: Thatcher and Son i judgement for plai
tiff.
60. Neustadter- Bros. VS. Thatch
aad Son /; udscmant for plaintiffs.
IS 81. L II Stockwell VS. RS Brown
7. verdict for plaintiff.
Il 62. + Il Jerome vs. E ONeil We
diet for plaintiff.
d 63. A. Bittner vs. l.. r. and j.
Chapman; continued
d. Ga. M. NJ. Williams vs. Ezra BAN
ct as mayor; tried and submitted,
e5. nj Leitch VS. Baird Bros
missed.
&C. T. III. Stockwell VS. A. r. and
& Biddison; court finds for plaintiff
points j. G. Elder referee.
k 67. The People VS. j A Mile
of pleads guilty to an assault and fined s.
and costs,
by 68. ] A Miller VS. Lucinda Brearle
dismissed
& 50. The People VS. John COTE
f.. plead to an assault and fined 500 a
Ii costs.
n 20. J. W. Northrup VS. Ezra Bali
sheriff continued,
l.. II. The People vs. A 3 Gallowa
n continued.
u. A A Lieuellen vs. Wasserm
rd and Co, /; stricken from Calendar,