St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1885-03-03

resentative; the Fifth ward, one representa-
tive, and the Seventh and Eighth wards, one
Representatives The act is to take effect after
Dec. 1, 1885.
The other bill relates to the board of edu-
cation, and provides: That at the annual
city election to be held ON the first Tuesday
of May, 1885, there shall be elected
one school inspector in each OF
the Eighth and Ninth wards, and
in each of the even numbered aldermanic
districts of the other wards, and at the an
nual city election in May, 1886, one school
inspector in each OF the odd numbered alder
manic districts, and annually thereafter
school inspectors shall be elected in the
aldermanic districts where the school in
spectors' terms of Office will expire on the
LIST of June next succeeding, and each of
said school inspectors shall hold Office for
two years from and after the first day of
June next succeeding his election.
Both bills were referred to the Ramsey
county delegation.
THE CRIMINAL CODE AND MARITAL RIGHTS.
Mr. Durant yesterday introduced the fol-
lowing resolution, which was adopted:
Resolved, That it is the sense of the house
that section 26 of chapter 5 of the penal code
is a gross innovation of the marital rights
of the citizens of the commonwealth of Min
nesota; and therefore be it further
ReSolved, That a proper regard for good
morals, and in obedience to the divine COM
mand, we recall said penal code from
the governor for correction and amendment.
DULUTH & IRON RANGE RAILROAD COMPANY.
The bill reached IN the calender to allow
the Duluth u Iron Range Railroad company
to go outside of the three counties in which
its land grant was located, to select the same,
a call Of the house was had and members
brought in, by which the bill was just saved,
the vote standing yeas Sc, nays 35.
HIGH LICENSE.
When the high license bill was reached on
the calendar, il was found the original bill
was absent from the house. When it was
received by the clerk the house then being
engaged in the passage of senate bills, Mr..
Daniels moved the license bill be taken up
and put upon its passage. Mr. Lienau raised
the point of order that such action would re-
quire suspension of the rules, but the
CudlI Tuleu uOI. Llendu ID6u moved
the bill be referred back to the committee of
the whole. Upon this motion Mr.. Dyar
moved call of the house, which was or
dered, and absentees were hunted up and
brought in, when vote was ordered upon
Mr.. Lienau's motion to commit, Messrs.
Dyar and Turrell first explaining that
the motion meant the death of the bill. Mr..
Lienau said his object was to give time TO
bat-a fhn WV tod bafc I1nr lofo
voting on it, so all could know what they
were voting on. Mr.. Pattee thought every
member knew the purport of the bill, and
that the delay attempted was for the mere
sake of killing the bill. He wanted to meet
the issue now. If the friends of the bill were
not strong enough to pass the bill, then let it
die. Mr.. Hendrickson favored the motion to
commit as did Messrs. Durant and Drake,
the latter protesting he did not do so to delay
the measure, but simply wanted time to ex-
anime the bill. Mr. Daniels made an appeal
for the bill when the roll was called and the
motion TO commit lost by vote of AZ to 81.
The vote announced, Mr.. Lienau moved
to lay the bill on the table, which motion was
lost by the same vote as above, 81 nays to
AZ yeas. Mr.. Dyar moved the previous
question and Mr.. Downs, D., moved the bill
be indefinitely postponed, claiming his mo-
ton was in order. The chair ruled Mr.. Dyar
in order, and on the roll being called the
previous question was ordered, yeas 81, nays
SO. The vote announced, Mr.. Downs, D.,
moved the house adjourn, but the speaker
refused to consider the motion, declaring the
third reading Of the bill to be in order and
the clerk proceeded to read the same. The
bill read, Mr.. Teubert moved the house adj
journ, which motion the speaker declared in
order. The roll call resulted, Yeas Sc,
nays 81. Mr.. Lienau moved a recess be
taken until s o'clock. Mr.. Evans raised
the point the motion was not in order, but
the speaker received the motion and on the
roll being called the motion was lost yeas 80,
nays 81. AS soon as the vote was announced
Mr.. Lienau moved the house adjourn and
another roll call was gone through with, re-
sulting yeas "a, nays 81. The result an
nounced, both Mr.. Dyar and Mr. Lienau
yelled "Mr Speaker the first moving the
previous question on call of the roll and
the latter that the house take recess. The
speaker recognized Mr.. Dvar and the roll was
called upon the question of ordering the
previous question and it was ordered, yeas
81, nays 80. The vote announced, Mr. Dyar
and others cried "question, question:" while
Mr.. Lienau moved the house adjourn, and on
a vote it was lost The roll was then called
on the bill and it was passed, yeas So, nays
80, as follows: