Peninsula enterprise. [volume] (Accomac, Va.) 1881-1965, 1885-05-09
ORRIS a. BROWNE,
Accomac c H., Va.

CAPT. O.. 4. BROWNE Sir
I used half a ton of your Cedar Island
Guanon last year Oh Corn and can say
that it doubled my crop in corn ami fod-
der. and nv neighhOrS and all others
who passed the field can testify to it.
1t was on very poor land. think it
paid me well-would like to use two or
three tons this year. Very Truly y ours,
George S, Mapp.
Bobtown, January, 26, 1888,
I used Cedar Island Guano on Sweet
potatoes, and am perfectly well salts
fled with the result, also used it on
Onions and other vegetables with the
best result w. d. FoSQue
SturgiS Z. o.
MIR. BI0wNE:-T tried your Cedar Is
land Guano last Spring on Sweet Pota-
toes. alongside of other fertilizers, and
think it nearly doubled in yield of any
other used. In fact, if | had not used it
at all. my potatoes would not have been
worth digging. John j. Ward,
IlaulOck, JilluttIy ID 1000.
CAPT. o. a. BROwAE:-DEAi; SIR:
used half il bag of your Cedar Island
Guano last year on Sweet Potatoes. al d
can truly say it eXcelS any fertilizer |
ever used. If had used it more extern
siyely | am confident it would have
doubled my crop, Willtry it again next
season. II. G. Johnson.
Willis Wharf, january, 29,1SS5,
I used Cedar Island Guano on Sweet
ard Irish Potatoes and Corn. On the
Irish it was fully equal to Peruvian
Guano. and better than any other fertil-
iZers. On the Sweets and Corn it was
equal to any fertilizer | have ever used,
Accomac G.. Ii. Va. Thos. Beasley,
I used Cedar Island Guano Oh Irish
Potatoes, next to Peruvian guano, there
was no difference in tile yield of either.
am of the opinion that with time &C.
dar Island will yield more. [ also put
it OIL Sweet Potatoes, and the results
were satisfactory, its yield WAS one
third more than where put no guano.
Drummondtown, WIN. w. CoXton.
1 used Cedar Island Guano on Peas
by the side Of Peruvian Guano, your
guano eXcelled the Peruvian by fur. and
on Irish Potatoes my experience is they
grow longer and yield more; | mean by
growing longer, that the vines do not
give up so early and Outyield the PERU
Wan. also appliedit to Corn, only about
{; handful to every three or four hills
with very good results. A. L. james,
Locus.ville, December, 10, 1854.
I used your guano last year side Peru
Wan guano and other commercial NAH
ures, on Irish and Sweet Potatoes, the
Cedar Island was equal to any. ! prefer
it. for the quality is up to amy, and it
costs less money. w. r. Bunting.
Folly Greek, near Drummondtown, JAN
uary, 9, 1855.
I used one-half ton of Cedar Island
Glrano on Irish Potatoes side by side
with Peruvian guano that cost $50 per
ton of 5000 pounds and other CONNER
cial fertilizers, that on which Cedar Is
land was used was better than Peruvian,
ard there was no comparison with the
other fertilizers. OF course, the long
drought and bugs prevented full crop
from maturing. +. U. IafkaS.
Matomkin, L. O.
used Cedar Island Guano on Irish
Potatoes with Peruvian Guano, and |
believe it to be equal to the Peruvian,
L also used it on Sweets; and the result
was excellent, ain going to use it again.
E. M. Savage.
Bells Neck. October, 8, 1854
| used Cedar Island Guano on Sweet
and Irish Potatoes with other fertlliz-
ers. and on Sweets I had better results
than any other, and fully as good on
Irish. am going to use it again next
year E. w. Kellam.
Sturgis, October, 8, 1884.
fused the Cedar Islaud Guano on Irish
Potatoes Notwithstanding the drouth l
realized at rate Of 10 barrels from one
barrel of seed by the use of 5000 pounds
of gu;lno per barrel of seed. | think it
the cheapest and best fertilizer in the
market. l shall continue to use it in the
future. Edwin I, Parks.
Leemont, Va, October, %, 1854,
I used your Guano last spring on Irish
potatoes side by side with Peruvian
tiuano and yours excelled it by one third
and was green While the OtllarS dried al
,,,oci out from thp lOur 6rO,lrht