New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1885-11-03
THE COURTS.
UNITED STATE, SUPREME COURT.

WAsHISer5N, Nov. 2.-The United States
snrTeme Court to-day rendered decision IN the case
of Peter c. A. Van Weet OF Netherlands agai Fred
erick II. Winston. The allegation is that Mr.. Winston
as president of the Chicago and Southwestern Railroad
Company, PERFORATED fraud in connection with the
issue of the bond transaction of tho company. Tho
Supreme Court Is Of opinion that Mr. Winston COM
mtted no fraud in the matter; that appellant has
shown right to relief and that the action of the Cir
cult Court diminishing the bill is therefore approved
Mr. Winston Is the recently appointed Minister TO Per-
STA.
The Supreme Court also rendered decision in tho
of John H. Sarin and Independent Steamboat
Company, appellants, against the Mayor Aldermen
and commonalty of the City of New-York. Orig1nal
suit brought In equity in 1884 against appellants
IN these TO restrain them from operati the
Staten Island Ferry Company without license por
mission of the appelees. The suit was renewed upon
Of United states and the cords in the State
having been ed tho Circuit Court remanded it. where
United States The lattor sustained the motion OF the
manded.
Opinions were also announced in the following
No l4-Richard Lancaster pl1n error at Henry T. o.
e ie @
costs Opinion by Nj Justice Blatehford l., u. ~,
baTa iSd In error 10 the CeM! GSsr o. the sd
affirmed with costs and Interest opinion BY MI Justice
GRAY.
No S97willam H. Anderson. executor &c. plaintiff in
aG tsio ,6 II. sTST to Of he T
Dgme an Ieyers with cofs and cause femsnGed Win d.
rectims to award new trial Opinion by Mr. Justice
No S3sHoward L: Henderson plaintiff in error. agt H.
aSs error sy e S 10 Pa1
ender-on plaintiff in error asst H. Es5e,lc wsdsw0rth
error S S syt il Eslse %sGs%oh eSrSS
Tor the wan" Of Opinion BY M
Justice " Gods.
Appeal from the Conrt OF Claims Judgement affirmed opn
No 40s.Soomon Noses ct al appellants agt George H.
Mo sler suit ordered 70 pc IN inc name 81 Tie
f., yina Notion 10 dismiss or aGrm denied: go,
States Motion advance gTsnte and cause assigned 9r
No. DO tdwad Boyd ct al plaintiffs in error against
n snd o on IL s Mondy in December next
mo ETC. SrSTn Mdcn 9snce ansa and
aeped for argument on first Monday in december
No 256,-E Z, g. HsnreK, plaintiff in aSt Eliza N.
wits Ra1'H G. d. -'''''D ''''''' '''''''N
No s2O-The Pacific Railway Improvement Company,
No. G27-Thc PaeinG Railway Improvement Company
ps o gss F, % hasay f1 Company
pSs1 U fTST a a 1 SaCad ffHs
TN qst Ella, Asie m In error 10 9e ce
York psmsNedper spustion each party paying Their own
20 55S4 ne City watersve pralntirin error BAL
s e tqHP"'' Of motion anu r. s"n, IL os'|'l'H
plaintiff v il M j. Osborn etc. In
error rcoit Court Onitei STATES the dis
Of KengucAy on motion OF sohn Is Goodoc ior pain
tin an error dismissed with costs
Gilman crook ct al, appellants agt the indian
apois, cincinnati aud Lafayette railroad Company ct al
IN TO tue circuit Court OF the United states or the
Southern iisr!ct OF ohio On motion OF Henry Wise Gar
OF counsel for appellants decree Of dismissal Of oeobsr
o. e5 rsnded case G missed at the cost OF The up
peee per stipuiati n
No go and 10 Us Thomas NJ jacks, plahtH IN error
City Of Helena motion 10 DISMISS suDmittci 10y
saunders support Of motion aud by J. {. TapIan and
J. O.. Horner position thereto
No 5o-antOn hilleT ct al appellants aGt 81 Force
ct al Argument began by Art1ur stern for appellants
continued By f. hurs0n he appeees and concluded
by George arding for appellants. ,-..,,
No 37-1he COUNTY OF Rolls County ps niih
In error agt. the United states rel {. e, Orge,
No ie County Court OF GP County plantin In error,
agt the United states rel. NJ Douglass
391he County Court OF RAILS county plaintid In er
ror agt. the United States rel N SARGENT.
lhe County Court OF Rails County, pantn IN CT.
rOr agt. the United States eG rel. VI DOuSlas;
NO5l-Te County Court Of Rails plaintiff IN er
r1r the United STATES rel Wa Is Montgomery
Circuit OF the United states 10 the
District oil Missouri Dismissed with costs pursu'
section :. rule 10. -
No 4Z-AssOel Gage. appellant 6gt Maria i Puupely
aud others Submitted by Augustus Gage ana \ q lnd.
lie appellant. and by = q Mason for apPellc-s.
No 44-IhOm Drew and others plaintiffs IN rnr, agt
Irving Grinnel and others sIecutOrs etc submitted Dy
Attorney General Garland for the defendant In error with
leave for plaintiffs ia 10 file brief Oh or be-
fore November Il