The Pascagoula democrat-star. (Pascagoula, Miss.) 1878-1920, 1885-05-01
CIRCUIT COURT.
Second Week.

court al JOurneu Saturday out OIL
respect to the memory of Mr.. j. q
Heidelberg, deceased. Business
was resumed Monday morning, and
the court adjourned sine dc Tues
day evening. The bulk of the
business was disposed of and the
dockets considerably reduced. Our
efficient officers were prompt in the
discharge of their duties, aud all
things moved on smoothly. We
publish below the proceedings bad
since u last issue, which makes
the complete report:
Y. Allis s. Co VS.. +. DeSmet ct nj. Dis
missed as to h. l.. Ca riere, CD. Carriere,
Ciiizens Bank of Louisiana aud Jas. j.
Tarleton. Issue Joined and verdict Tor
plaintiffs for $50 aud costs.
W. Ii. Howell vs.. Mnrdock McInnis-
certiorari from w. G, McQuistOn's Justice
court. The court heard and considered
assignment of error and finding no error
on the face of the record the Judgment of
the Justice court was affirmed.
ii. n. Cudabac VS.. Il. U. Delmas. Con
tinued by consent,
Smith, HOullemet & Davis VS.. Z. De-
Smet ct al. Continued.
Two cases Of The Peter Stowell Il Co.
vs.. T.. DeSmet ell al, in which plaintiffs
moved TO strike ont of de-
PENDANTS. Motion oycrruled and defend
ants ulloyed to plead. Wicks Bros. VS..
4. DeSmet, allowed to plead also.
Smith & BUullemet vs.. Emile l.. Car
rieIc ct al. Motion TO strike out plea of
defendant, which was sustained. Defend
ants in open court de clined to plead fur
tber or to apply for leave to plead, there
fore Judgment against Emile j.. Carriere
and Charles j, Carriere was rendered for
S96G. SO and a lieu given upon the Phoenix
and Borden and Elder saw mills rs per
chapter SO of the code of 1880.
The State VI. Jas. Hall, burglary-jury
and verdict for defendant.
The State VS.. L. L. Maxwell, violation
Of privilege tax law. Guilty and fined
$50 aud costs.
L. Castanera VS.. Citizens Bank of La,
ejcctment-jnry and verdict for plaintiff.
The State vs. Fritz Cromer. Nolle
prOsequi.
The State VS.. Jerry Showers, Buck Mel
son, James Hall David Hill, Henry Glen
and John Hogan. Continued.
The State We. Andrew Mcdonald, Aba
ted by death of Mcdonald.
The State VS. Albert James. NOlle pros
equi.
A. J. Ramsay VS.. Thos. Stiglets, Con-
tinued.
Citizens Bank vs.. z. Csstanera, eject.
ment-jury and verdict for defendant.
J. II. Wright VS.. G. NJ. Browne, re-
J.. 4. Muse, elaimant-jury aud
verdict for claimant.
A, Blumer VS.. S. p. Taylor, ~replevin.
d. J. McLead, claimant-judgmcntby the
for claimant.
ID. A. Cheffraix VS.. Z. i. Carriere.
Plaintiff required to give y new bond in
attachment.
II. NJ. Cudabac VS.. E.. DeSmet. Citizens
Bank claimant-jury aud verdict for
claimant.
d. Il. Dunlap VS.. NJ. G. Oneal-judg-
ment by consent for 500 for plaintiff.
The State VS.. Chas. Campbell. false pre-
Plead guilty and sentenced two
years in the p~enitentiary.
The State vs.. Abe Stewart-iury and
guilty Of assault and battery.
The State VS.. j. j. ROden and Ii. +.
acknowledgement nisi made final.
w. A. Dawson VS.. Z. Bentz aud VIM.
Gill VS.. II. Shannon, MuusOn g. Co. and
Rice, Borne g. Co. W.. +. DeSmet ct al.
II. b. Schurck vs.. u. DeSmet ct al,
Two cases Filler stOwell g. Co. VS.. E.
DeSmet, Wicks Bros. Va Z, DeSmet, Dan
ner Land g. Lumber Co. VS.. Mead Bros.
aud Justin Durell VS.. Mrs. Ada Henry are
lll continued until next term.
Zuberbier & Behan VS.. II. Krebs & Son.
to the u. S. court.
HarralsOn a. Co. VS.. L. Randall-jndg-
nent by consent for S309.29 in favor Of
A. Blumer vs. L. Randall-judgment By
consent for S27675 IN favor Of plaintiff
Peoples Savings Bank Ts. l.. Randall
Judgment by consent for S296.l 10 in favor
# plaintiff.
John c. Phelan VS.. L. Randall-judg-
nent by consent for S3O0.A2 in favor Of
John Henry a. Co. vs.. L. Randall
Judgment by default for 341.67.
John Henry d Co. vs.. Lyman Randall,
a. L. Cumbost, garnisdees-judgment
" default for &41-H against J. a L.
;umbest, and in favor Of plaintiff sohn
henry & Co. Va l. Randall.
&. N. Howell, ganishce-iudgment BY
for E4f.H against 9. n. Howell
Moses Lobe a. Co. vs.. i. Randall at
achment. No defense, therefore con sid
red By the court Is nghtfnlly sued out
lyman ReeveA garnishee, having made
Judgment wa rendered for S25505.
Mary Frohne ". L. Randall, attach
sustained snd Judgment for plaintiff {
Delmas Broa ". l.. Randall, attach
lent. No defense and attachments sus- !
lined and Judgment for plaintiff. {
James Howell. garuishec, having made {