The Hawaiian gazette., 1884-10-15

Ia seems e ne that this case Is Without icund-
sffoa. and Il arises IN this way. On The dc4sA
az NakziuS. interstate. her heirs 81 law sup
pcsci they Inherited az interest IN her pre-
pessy Prcocoiings were then instituted IN
rebate fo-p administration ou her estate. Puuhe
ana suo-e thai her name vas Naka'uhi and
hat Nakaluhis name was puaheana- Il was
afterwards discovroi hat ihcsc two woncn
ho-e these namos iuterehangesbly. 81; the
facts arc uudispuiei that the plaintiff Puu-
hssua IS TIC widow q Nalaweha, the patez,ce.
luki deceased was the wife q lao, The II :
hate Court decided hat " survivorship The
husband. Iio. was entitled 70 the whole estate
l il he land. the decd bc5ns 10 hin and his wife
io;u,lv. and declined to syAui letters Of admin
isirston.
When NJ. Castle read The decd 10 them,
Pruhcaua. wGilehua. tNakzluhi's fathcyl kciki
and others 10 ajssafisfac;ScG was oppressed
/ think this suii Was conceived by The rela-
iives o. Puuhcaua on her hchalf, N their dts
Eppoirtu,eus thar Las hcoale BY the operation
q law TIC owner os The whole estate.
Tie numerous declarations maze ty Puu-
hsaua land which ART not douiedl iha, she had
given the land % Nasalnhl and Lilo arc
vrcichsv These admissions against her pre-
sent position 20 yeIy iar towards destroy ING
her ev58encs.-hutShc Is old and iccble and
D &
arr promising this sui;-
The remarkable aSuconcai q Tx witnesses
al the plaiutie as 10 the date q The deed beng
Sept 9Th. which Is The wrong date, shows
something q concert IN srrauSlns thsiE iesii-
ulo-v Tor whisA, hcrcastc-. SCuncii are no,
al Al responsible
NJ n sheloua received uo over tSSool
Eve dollars fcr bis services and u Is incoa-
caivahle tha, be should have committed =
cTuss fra1i upoa hts coghdiuC fellow county
men and backed ]; uT with perjury. toS Sc
small san q money.
I cannot rosiss he impression MADE upon
ne Nv shc evidence that thC-c was 90 fTz1a
przciioed upon Fauhozua, and IND the truth 70
he that tie decd o. The 9Th Of Sept. lS7s was
intended 10 be maic, Is ii vas ia TAG; made,
70 Maksluhi and Lao. FC- shis reason the
bill nus, he dismissed.
The amended bill alleges substantially that
since the Sling OF the o-lsiu2l lill the plaintiff
discovered Tia; .ha; the said Lie had had
executed and delivered &c lea b, Castle =
deci q Conveyance q TIC saIc land and that
SAID l. had Afterwards 20 VII On thu
CAV O.. -.---------lS ISIS made = dscS a con
veyzuco q = p5T.iou q SAID land II Robe-s
Levers and .horeuDou tie plaintiff ot;Ainei
leave &c make la and ". Z Castle and K.
Levers parties defendant TEa; SAID deed
10 Castle and Levers arc clouds upoa p.zla-
tits title. Tx plaintiff charges that these de-
PENDANTS s-s %; bona nit purchases and thai
Ms Castle uttaiuc5 TIE deed froz Las WITH
On; adequate calsi5e-ztio-.s 1A&I these ceiea-
ants had uo;ics q the fraudulent character q
The deed to l.io before The purcassc froua Lla
thai the defendants had uosIce q such iAciS
and Circumstances as were reasonably cal
ezlzse5 &c -; then upo- iulliEy as q Ire
frariulaui chz-acsc- q The 6ee1 &c l.lo- and
that he defendants had -o4sla Is suspec. and
had heard HAT plaintiff 5aals1 lie validity 9.
The iesi and proposed &c comics; lie sane
The answer q NJ. ana Ms. C4sac &c such
gzris Of lie bll Is they a-e ADVISED Is material
tl- then &c 4asv7e- Is, 'tlat Q-lJ- &c The SID
dee5s q sid Ida i. Castle and Z, Levers
respectively neither uue O. these defendants
had no;ics O; any f-su6Eie1. oaar2cior Q. sad
deed 10 sad Lilo, 0- q z1y facts O. circuzsi-
Eaccs reasonably calculated e PM Ehc-l O.
any one O! then uFsu enquiry concerning Ihs
sane and TIA. neither one g: tleSc defendants
pIios 20 shs taking @ ilsiI respective des1s
had heard 81 tc1a lai1-Es1 tias the plaintiff
disputed q proposed e oa1sos; 90 Gti-2ie tEs
validity .. her sad deed
NJ evidence vas CEc-c5 on tbs raTs o. Tue
plaintiff = show lhzi Nj. ana Ms Castle O
NJ. Levers ha5 Eailu1 g shc tc4l-luicai
character CT The dea5 10 Iio-
Tae testimony 90 behalf g lie defendants
- show thsi- VA. q. ll.i1e ~. Vas chest
e l. ~ plaintiffs C-Elsol OF La --ggu1 ihzt
I The zusWe- does %; contain Tie c1liSi.e avG--
meas &c sui7slG then l. lll bsaezi ui 'sucl
eyi5cnce. And ihc CCaase. oise5 cases not-
ably Boo iza5 Lll5l1s, Do Pac-s 77-2Ss-. 70
sustain he p1si5oa tA2s ,1 caasls : defendant
70 tie bcae6, O. TIC defense @; bona dde
purchase. -. ms -lll-c IA. sle .-auiu- Vas
sezze5 u lex and ll possession. tlzi sssc Of
fe-sizui paid ri-c c1lslda-zsiul N good talsa
and vishou; actual c- construction uolce g.
the trau5.
Al extended cxzzl51-atiaz q the oase q
Boone - Gales viii show. .lzi ne "dee1
referred e vas lc7g cla,-sc; @. p1,ce Sc,
AID Thai there v-zs % 4llsE@slo- q The answer
-eie-llC IL lie ~5ea5. he descl54u.s zaerely
a-ss-ss5 = co1s-aci &c purchase aa5 lie CozSz
vel say Ia; . party Is uoi allowed 30 st4ss
oas case il ths' hi GO answer and make oai
= di5o-eus ous ty q-oat-
In lie case .. da- lie charge q b1ius par
chsss-s raj a5-i1s IS dis.lucsly made asaias'
5eies5azis which ihey deny and 7 think under
.iis plea55l-< shis VS. szsz-isa:-
Bz3 havia- 6ec5ei .h-- :hs decd fro1
plaintiff q Nakli1ai and Il59 ms. S.El5, ile-s
Is % accas5a1 sa-.le- 90 discuss tie s1asioas
IS . tie Stains o. The subsequent purchase =.
oaly ueei repeal tasi tbs-s j uo evidence
affecting ihaz vii ucs5cs- b-s . positive
5szial q iht pz-s q NJ. Castle thai lie had
AZ -szsa- II s1spec. this The 5eei % cues
tio- vaS s-1u5uiea;-
he tlll l-ass ts Llsu-ssc1-
n. Tb1-l7so1, : Russell and :. 4 FoeP0s
f1- plaintiff