The pioneer express. [volume] (Pembina, Dakota [N.D.]) 1883-1928, 1884-10-10
=. 1900 ~ CO..

II III NJ speecAee vsre hr,es IA nooal,v v;th
rs,f ,.e....s.. u .s,ss Ts.X S-s..H-.
- 4, - IL pas "a low oeessaona
- refefrsd . ~ pending canvass
~ Tolsdc 10 aid: I should d any tim,
= ~, sN = - - ~ Poc1ully
" PohacaA oppcQ0n@ 1shouldtn my present
position, deem II altogeeher improper. Ivoald
rather b IL victim n .Iaraar ma, ~ .,t,,,,
.,.ssss-, s--e .
a. ssT nus tnese arc some @ins'
The position fdo. 10 can vour atsent,on - NJ.
RennhI,r., 49,. =. s.s.---.s ~ ~
+ .'otHps'csa parry nas governed mo country
ION sWeny-four yoaIs IN the spirit and accord
ing 10 The measures Of . broad nat,on.litv.
Tho progress under our royernmenf IN TX
spirit has far trenecended she ,,rnSress n,slss
(Applsusal 10 remand the e q. mi. ny Y.
% Tie control Of our opponcnts. Who 40 not be-.
heye In The constitu6onality Of the meesrire,
which have given Ills progress, would b !
shouts Of "Corroct y When v sP ara.e i BID
question Of protective teri6. No Arc i,ot mar.
initted to re1srl Il mofelv - "a h ~ ~
tied on the basis Of e1pediency. because the
large majority Of our Opponents hold 4 pro.
tective tariff TO be unconstitutional There r
party has adopted nor one grest step fhe nsrtv
has taken sinoe the inaugufstion Of I6rshsrn
lincoln in 1881. that ina 6emoo1,tic nsytv ~.
not opposed and has mot considered nnconsti.
tutionsl 30 that today 70 remand the row
e.: eminent Of the United States e the control q
change Of parties; II d . total fsversai Of tbs
Of the United states since 1851. fReneWed an.
plsusal Il 10 giving to the narrowing doQms
Of states rights the precedence In TIA Orsnd
march which has been made, and which could
nationality. fssThAt's right, Il Il il on M
great plane that the Rep16licsn nsrtv has dom
me the honor 10 present me e. csnalidate b.
fore yon. rApplausel II IL on that plane.
with I'll that IL implies. that I am tofore you
and before III tho people Of tho United sssses
At Hamilton, he spoke more q length. q fol
lows: = : -
Citizens Of Ohio: II Il now forty Year, sinos
the question Of protective tariff eiesQed M
attention Of the American people e. profound
y q IL does to-day. Il was IL tho contest BE-
tween Nj. Clay and Polk. In 1874. mt ina rrest
national debate on ibis question toof pisoe. m
the protective tariff NJ defested not ~ m
popular vote, but by The bad faith Of The party
which succeeded In The election; and I bee "a
call your at.enticn to the fact that tho policy Of
defeated In tho United States b. popular. vote
pie ct different times through the bad fsit6 Of
their representatives: but never. / repeat Nv
popular vote upon . deliberate appeal To- tie
people in their primary capacity. Il there
fore would seem to be the duty Of
the people Of the United states, II majority
Of them believe in the policy Of projection. "a
soc to It that that party Is sustained which can
be trusted to uphold il [Cheera ssYes. but. >
said gentleman to mo yesterday. ssprofection
does not always secure abundant prosperity.
There arc : great many idle mon now IN Tic
e. Mgl Grant, there ere There has
man that viii insure, through III times. and
Ill seasons, CONTINUOUS dow Of prosperity:
but the question 10 whether, over eivcn se.
ries Of years, there has moi been . lsrrer de-
gree Of prosperity to the people under The
policy Of protection than under The policy Of
tested not by the experience of . single year,
~. ts o. series we