The river press. [volume] (Fort Benton, Mont.) 1880-current, 1884-10-15
DISTRICT COURT.
October Term-Wade, G. j. Presiding.

October Term-Wade, G. ]. Presiding.
WEDNESDAY, October8
MORNING SESSION.
w E Turner VS. E Davis; stricken
from the docket with leave to reinstate.
Lip Kim VS. King Maing Ordd; stay
of execution released.
John w Tattan presented to the court
the resolutions Of respect passed by the
bar of Fort Benton to the memory OF
the late Jacob A Kanouse. On motion
the court ordered the resolutions spread
upon the minutes.
CASES DISMISSED.
Meloche VS. Meloche.
w III Burgess vs j w Johns.
Cans & Klein VS. j w Johns.
Greenhood, Bohm & Cows j w Johns.
Gabische VS. The Helena & Benton
Stage Co.
ID q Browne, assignee, vs. John 5 At
Gibson and Charles Atchison.
Kennedy & Kelly vs. Spitzley & Ira
vers.
A M Valley VS. J M Arnoux and Jno
Hunsberger.
Chas Peterson VS. Fred Merchant.
ID G Browne, assignee, VS. the Glen
denim Mining & Smelling Co.
J w Tattan VS. the Clendenin Mining
& Smelling Co.
Morris Bros VS. w A Cameron.
Pepin VS. Pepin.
Fiske & Burghardt VS. Burton Bros.
CONTINUED FOR TERM.
CB Fowler vs. the Collar Mining Co.
Samples vs. Richard Nee.
First National Bank of Fort Benton
VS. II G Tillinghast ct al.
Geo r Choate VS. the ClendeEin Min
ing & Smelling Co.
Sullivan & Settle VS. James McDevitt.
w III Wright VS. Jno B Terhune.
WP Wren VS. D Weatherwax.
Court Sheriff VS. d w Culbertson.
DG Browne VS. Houston q Mckay.
DEFAULT ENTERED.
Kleinschmidt & Bro VS. M w Endsley
John r Murphy & Co VS. the Clenden-
in Mining & Smelling Co.
Standley VS. Keilhauer.
Dyas VS. Dyas
J. D. Weatherwax VS. Jos Hanna.
Copenhaver VS. COpenhaver.
r C Power & Bro VS. Spitzley & Ira
vers.
A M Hotter & Bro VS. K Castner.
Hart VS. Hart.
AFTERNOON SESSION.
Territory VS. Eva Lamont; stricken
from the docket.
VIM Rowe VS. the City of Fort Ben
ton: demurrer to comp1aintssustained,
and Judgment for defendant; notice OF
appeal given.
JOS Curry VS. Houston & Mckay; de-
murrer Overruled; leave to answer III
stanter.
DG Browne VS. S L Houston; demur-
rer argued and submitted; taken under
ad Erisement.
Morril VS. Burgess; demurrer sustain
ed: plaintiff ordered to amend COM
plaint: defendant ordered to answer
instanter.
Cannon VS. w III Buck ct al; default
andjudgment entered; cause continued
as to defendant J ] Healy.
Copenhaver VS. Copenhaver default
entered; decree of divorce granted plain
tiff and custody OF child.
J B Dyas VS. Lizzie E Dyas; default
entered and decree of divorce granted.
THURSDAY. October 9.
Territory VS. Pomeroy; continued fol
Territory VS. Richard Nee; continued
for term.
Territory VS. Winschell and Pomeroy
continued; defendant Winschell order
ed to furnish new bond.
Territory VS. VIM Young; continued.
Randall VS. Craig; continued.
d G. Browne VS. S L Houston; con-
tinued.
Kleinschmidt ct al VS. NJ w Endsley
Judgment rendered for plaintiff.
Murphy, Maclay & Co vs. Clendenin
Mining & Smelling Co; Judgment fol
plaintiff.
Lip Kim VS. King Maing Ordd; judg.
ment for plaintiff.
Standley VS. Keilhauer; judgment fo1
plaintiff.
TC Power & Bro VS. Spitzley & Tray
ers !; judgment for plaintiff.
I 6 Baker & Co VS. Houston q Mckay;
judgment for plaintiff.
r A Cummings VS. Choteau County
Commissioners; judgment for plaintiI
Jno G. Maclay VS. Choteau County
Commissioners Judgment for plaintiff.
Mary Hart VS. Samuel Hart: contin-
ued.
Eliza Sample VS. A 2 Sample; decree
of divorce granted.
Lucy Bourassa VS. w A Cameron
continued.
Jos Curry VS. Houston & Mckay; con
tlnued.
There being 30 further business the
court adjourned for the term.
~-+@~Dt..-1.-
Rapid Extinction of Robe and Fur Bearing
Animals Effect on the Market