Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1884-05-20
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.
ptIH Il
DEPARTMENT ONE.

DEPARTMENT ONE.
| SATURDAY, May 18th
| 9i6O-Taylor vs.. Bidwell-Appellant allowed
ten days from date to file brief. The Court
DEPARTMENT ONE.
| MONDAY, May 18th.
Court met pursuant to adjournment: Present,
) McKinstry j., presiding; Ross j.: Mckee j.:
| Mccarthy, Clerk Finkler, Bailitf
| Calkins VS.. Stembach ct als.-Upon the stipu-
lations filed it is hereby ordered that defendants
and appellants may have twenty days from May
| :, 1881, within which to serve and file their
| opening brief herein, and that appellants and
| respondents may withdraw their respective
| points and authorities now on file, and may
authorities.
sedgwick. executrix, vs. sedgwick, sr.-By
| consent, ordered placed at the foot of the cal
endar for this day.
Si95-Hetterman VS. Treadway-Uporft the sug-
gestion of diminutiOn OF record, ordered that the
| transcript herein be amended pursuant to the
stipulation ON file herein By consent, cause or
| dered submitted on the points and authorities
on file.
| S25O-Farington VS.. Brown eli aI-Argued by
| Budd for appellant, Campbell for respondent,
| and submitted.
S277-West vs.. Girrard-By consent ordered
| submitted on the points and authorities on file
S300-Bank OF Stockton vs.. JOnes-Argued by
| Carter for appellant, Campbell for respondent,
and submitted.
| Henry Powell VS.. a. r. Crayton-Petition for
| supersedeas, etc, argued by Harpham for petit
| toner and Milford in opposition, and ordered
submitted on the at1idayits and papers on file.
Sl36-Porter VS. Miller ct al.-Argued by Budd
for appellants ana Pillsbury for respondents and
| submitted.
| Society of Stockton VS. Dahl ct al-By con-
sent, ordered to foot of calendar for this day.
S691-SedgWicH. eXecutriX, vs.. SedgNyick ST.
| Upon the suggestion by respondent of diminu-
ton of the record ordered that the transcript be
amended by the insertion of additional plead
ings. Cause argued by Budd for appellant, Pills
| don't ug,I stti rNif
! S62-Bennett, administrative. FiSheret al
| Pursuant to stipulation, ordered continued and
| placed at foot of san Francisco calendar at its
| next session.
9OS9-IIart vs. Western Union Telegraph Com
! pany-By consent appellant allowed ten days
! to file brief respondent ten days TO reply; cause
| to be thereon submitted.
| II. Powell VS.. \. X. Creightou-In this case it
| is ordered that the appellant do appear on
Thursday, May -. 1884, at 10 O'Clock \. NJ. of said
| day, before Mr.. Chief Justice Morrison, mt his
! chambers in the city of san Francisco, prepared
| to execute an undertaking on appeal under Sec
ton 95i OF the Code of Civil Procedure with two
| or more SUrctieS in the sum fixed by the Judge
of the lower Court and in the meantime sale of
| the mortgage premises il stayed upon payment
of The costs incurred by advertising the sale.
The Court.
In the matter OF Tuesday calcndar-Ordered
that all eases on Wednesday calendar be adj
Vdnccd and placed on Tuesdays calendar for
argument.
Adjourned until tomorrow at 10 L.. NJ
DEPARTMENT TWO.
SATURDAY, May 18th.
7925-Marteen vs.. Hill-Judgnent and order
reversed and cause remanded with instructions
| to render Judgment for plaintiff in accordance
! with the prayer of his complaint.
MONDAY, May 18th.
Court net pursuant to adjournment Present
| Thornton, j., presiding; Myrick, j., SharpStein
! j.; Williams, Deputy Clerk kerWin, Bailitf.
9}2S-tiilespie v. Wlnn-ArgueG by Freeman
| for appellant, Hart for respondent, and submit
| ted
| 872-Heggerty ". POWerS-Argued by John
| son for appellant ScanHiker for respondent, and
| submitted.
9H9-johnson vs.. Board of Supevisors-Ar-
| gued by Catlin for appellant, Johnson for re-
! spOndent. and submitted.
| 9iol-CrOSs v. Sacramento Savings Bauk-Ar
| gued by Mckunc and Hart for appellant Free
| man for respondent, and submitted.
| 9i2O-Nan 1ussell, Estate of-Argued by Edger-
| ton for appellant. Appellant allowed ten days
| 70 file brief; cauSe thereon to be submitted
| 952S-HCrzog vs. Julien Argued by Laura De
| Force Gordon for appellant, Abels for respond
| cnt. and submitted.
Adjourned until tomorrow at 10 A. NJ
McCue V. Observation-Disclosures reversed with
| directions to the Court below 10 enter Judgment
| in favor OF the plaintiff on the findings. The
Court.
IN BANK.
SATURDAY. May 18th.
9l2i-People vs.. Acknowledgements affirmed
The Court.