St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1884-07-24
Adjourned to 10 a. m. to-day.
COMPLAINTS FILED.

Ferdinand Boyer ct al; argued and submit
ted.
Adjourned to 10 a. m. to-day.
COMPLAINTS FILED.
Chas. William Weber VS.. Charles Stahnke,
Robert NJ Bell aud Frederick s. Bell, his
wife Robert NJ. Bell is the owner of lots 5
and 6, of block 80, of Lyman Dayton's addi-
ton: on lot 6 and close to the line
of block 5, said Bell sank a well
to supply dwelling houses on both
lots. March s, 1888 Bell sold lot 5 with full
right to use well in lot 6 and right to ingress
and egrcss thereupon for water, and he has
since used said well and paid money to keep
appliances for raising water in repair. May
"a, 1884 Bell sold lot to Charles Stain Ike
subject to rights of plaintiff on premises who
has refused plaintiff use of the well, kept the
appliances Of the same under lock and key
and forbids plaintiff going upon lot 6 to
draw water. He has also erected a high
board fence without an outlet between the
two lots and wholly estopped the plaintiff
from his rights. Weber asks that his title to
the well be cleared and also that Stahnke be
enjoined from shutting him out of lot 6 to
obtain his water supply until the suit is de-
cided.
Otto G. Hospes VS.. Schultz & Becht; Feb.
Is, 1888, the defendants entered into agree
ment of copartnership by which plaintiff was
to pay in $4,000 cash and defendants to
turn over the same amount in the stock of
goods Of NJ. A. Schultz & Co., of which the
latter were partners and half owners. The
goods were to be turned over at cost price
and certain guaranteed accounts and notes
due at their face value which should not be
collected and due the firm of Nc. A. Schultz
d Co., by July, 1888. The plaintiff paid in
$4,000 cash and the defendants turned In
the property and assets of the said M. A.
Schultz & Co. Oct. Is, 1883, Schultz sold to
Becht & Hospes his share in the firm, and
it was agreed that the defendants should re-
main liable for the uncollected accounts of
NJ. A. Schultz 81 Co, as agreed in the part
nership, except the time be extended until
nine months from Oct. 18th, 1888, and to
pay interest on such sums that they thus
become liable for from Oct Is, 1888.
Therefore said Becht sold to Hospes for value
received, all his right title and interest,
claims and demands in the rights, assets,
property or shares in action of the firm of
Schultz, Becht q Harper. The complaint
states that there remains unsolicited of the
accounts of M. A. Schultz 81 Co. turned
over to Schultz, Becht & Hospes, 70 July Is,
1884, the sum of So, 4o3.01, with interest at
10 per cent from Oct. Is, 1883, for which
plaintiff demands judgment against defend
ants.
The Chicago st. Paul. Minneapolis &
Omaha Railway company VS.. the Cedar
Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northern Railway COM
pany, the Chicago. Milwaukee and st. Paul
Railway company and the Burlington, Cedar
Rapids and Northern Railway company, their
contractors and agents; action to enjoin de-
fendents from tearing up the tracks of plain
tiff on their right of way at the town of Pipe
stone for the purpose of laying tracks across
the same and occupying said right of way
belonging to plaintiff; also to enioin defend
ants from using or occupying any of plain
tiff's right of way in Pipestone county.
Plaintiffs injunction bond filed and temper
airy injunction granted by Judge Simons.