The Lake Charles echo. [volume] (Lake Charles, Parish of Calcasieu, La.) 1876-1898, 1884-08-16

a Ra s
Mes Fssk unrna uAicl zspigas
ss1ininanne Il - sppp1lt q l5lslnes
sags N zhe ssfn Hrsslaen&ia cusi
tes sha aaeasion i simply this .
SHALL ssse IaisGd safas rso1eet is
sad sxtend Its Legitimate IN
uannn 6n6 H. trade aith othFz Arneg
7caa xEna I.hss Il 81 to be sup-
pasn5 has referancc tnSfhe alleged 81
risifv ~ Biaines s&nsssfnans llTi
hiSh. II hA Hese President would
ee III line ekiEnns and 4bn country
Tie rnntngrs 6f passonal psoteetion
aud SECESSION idhnenea and tlakie
Is AugEnsted ~ she A6ses
ona ian Aheg 4 q nct ehj0Y
question represented A. being
she sians pgiht e. the cAsapaigsss
ousnsa1t II Ia daaa fvnin knFhasllsan
sonSse uoafd Be- Inare pertinent i
AN antF 3 i pguaeckiag uitisaBa Of sbe
.sd states zn1 sf extending It's in
finnnna nnd trade, which il must Be
irfssred i being neglected. were not
incnmhunf upon the pazty in power.
III Ahas aufy Il MT bping attended 70
and su1uebody Is sasvezable for the
nealert. Acre n the blnlna 40 be laid /
E1ea eau no qllsstion be brought into
she easapAinn Mslli any aavaEtage g
fha ruling party
But the idea Is intended 10 be cor
wcred tint there y something wrong
which czn be ssmeiiea only By put
siur Blnins ipao ahe Presidential char.
This posision is assumed By his sup
porters exen at the expense OF has
party wEieh, whTic ii holds The reins,
must be held responsible Il The goE@
esmFnent issdereiscs in it duty either
81 knsne o. abrnad
Empty prnAauAiun, however u not
ssiiseieni 20 eobriRce sise people thsi
aheFc il anything ~ aile nhnFarter or
alsilisy ID tie Aulilgsn statesman that
Mahad femeay any drieienties n the
administration 81 ahe goseEnmsHt
uhaAher selaaiBg 20 eslher home o.
forssrn inseresis. His inaiseFeei an
tesfrTrnes as SseFegary Of Statesin The
alfaira cf Other cuansFies Which came
ncsr ieaaing 20 UNNECESSARY trouble
waa not indicative Of lhs ability %
pFoaect the rights Of American c1fit
zeHs and advaBes the National infia-
enee IN fcreign countries wbieh hss
supporters elaim fer him.
0ur EEssh citizens who are liable 20
arreat and Imprisonment BY the Eng
lish aushprities could be more bene-
fisied " vigorous inieTp0sltien ahan
ans olhsxel Of uasuralized citizens.
Bet Blaine has never shewr oIspo-
sstisn &c interest himself in lheir be-
hmiF. dis record when az ahe hsad OF
Ehe Slsle DeBarsmezt. in the esses OF
sas .Amexieans confined IN hRg-
lish prisons, Nss marked by an iua5f-
fssrnce which appeared 10 strong con-
trast 10 the Vigcr displayed in mss
dsalin9 1IiEh She seak South AmtEi-
can Repnbiies. He nOnsiy conceded
he right Of The English authorities 70
arrest and treat rs they saw b. any
IrishsAmezican citizen they chose 30
.consideF obDezi0ns and who Was so
unfortunate u 10 come within their
grasp.
IL the Blaine supporters propose 70
make The protection Of American citi-
xens abroad and Ghs extension Of oar
trade and influence with Other eoan-
tries leading qaesiiaH so The cam
paign, ahey have made poor choice OF
aesendara-bsaFer who failed TO protest
against English imprisonment Of IRISH
American citizens when he had the
official opportunity 20 do 80, and
~hose restrictive tariff policy confines
oar trade ard commercial Influence
wiss c1ler countries to the naErowest
limit