The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-06-17
oRTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST
SESSION.
SENATE

W~A'HIhGfON, June 10 ~-lfitss ne
o!lowifg rttoiulipr, offered by Mr.. Vsu
Fvck, was lid over tilt 10 morrow;
Rssniy 4, That tho committee on judi
iary 70, directed TO irquire Whether the
Tnion ur Central Pacific raj way com pauies
fave become Responsible for or guaranteed
he iAlcfus, 90 any bondg other tAan those
lspeCTNIly authorized by congress or out
tnndiog 40 the date OF the passage al the
,ot maxine appropr atoms for legislative,
xecniiss end Judicial expenses o. the GOV.
irnfneuf tor rEe year ending June Goth,
S75, a1d n ~ 70 Whist extent and under
ybat rctaal or alleged authority; also
whether any new stock has been issued by
ithsr a ssid companies 10 relation to said
ct.
Mr.. Plumb, from tho committee on ap.
ropria ious, reported be army apprOpria.
lon bin. Asagfeed upnn by the commit.
De-, 30 spgIopr!ates $205 COO more than the
iDuse bill.
i sensatlon wsI created in the ssuete
c-Gay ny Mr.. Iugats, who Unlimited that
'enator BrOrB EsA insbr'Cd in an official
'eport Of a debate words not spoken by
Ar. ingalls,, thus CGrdmiptiDg forgery upon
he records Of the senate. The chair called
Ar. Iugslls 10 order and after considerable
xcited tall, the matter " NJ over until to-
borrow.
Mr.. Ingalls, rose 10 q question OF pera- nal
privilege. He read the debate Of last Fri
lay in the bill relating 20 the claim Of The
tate OF Georgia fos money expended for
ommon defense in l7T He objected to
erLain words Waich hs said had been in.
erted IL The hand Writing Of Mr.. Brown IN
ne official reporters manuscript Of debate,
nd which Mr.. Ingblls claimed had not
cen spoken in the senate. He
MD he wss ALWAYS willing to subject him.
elf TO the .Jrtunes Of daily DEBATE, whether
victory or defeat, but was not secure
gaiEst the Psrthian arrows that d flying
De mighI ee tit to discharge from the safe
,mbush Of ~printiug.hcuse. The words he
lbjec,sd To were: His monopoly OF which
have no right to infringe" referring 10
That Mr.. Brown had called one OF Mr.. In.
,alls' char c~teristic %tpeechee, and words
10 will not 10 state" referring TO n Of The
rgsl voints sr'sin" IN y discussion.
This mode Of warfare, Mr.. Ing0ils con-
fnued, was e%minently safe to the II who
wages II, bat was not satisfactory 10 the
'ictim.
Mr.. Ingalls, IL quired whether the senator
rom Georgia (Mr. Brown was satisfied he
issd the language he used.
MIR. Brown replied 1t was his recollection
be usen IL.
Mr.. Ingalla asked whether no did not,
after debate was over and the report pre-
pared iof the printer, deliberately inferno
late into the report OF the proceedings
thereby falsiiying the record nnd commit
ting forgery upon the records OF court.
[Sensafion
The chair said the senator vas out Of
order. II he had any accusations to make,
he sbould make them in c different way.
Mr.. Beck (sotto voict)-"I would no. an
awer thai.n
Mr.. Ingalls-"Lnnguags like that was
not uttered In debate and Is susceptible OF
offensive Interpretation"
Mr.. Brown-"I decline to make shy re.
ply 10 that"
Mr.. Iogslls-"I supposed he would"
The ohAir-'rhe senator from Kansas -
out Of order"
Mr.. Brown addressed the chair.
Mr.. Ingslls-'I have The floor, | believe"
The char agreed hat Mr.. Ingalls, bad
the floor, hut that 10 the opinion Of the
chair, the senator's remarks imputed i'm.
proper conduct TO another senator. III
b. no objections" the chair added,
''the senator will proceed 10 ORDER
Mr.. ingalls, said the mode OF attack re.
ferred TO required about the same amount
OF courage as that exhibited bv n thug who
waited until his enemy was asleep aud then
him. He moved that the language
to which hs had called attention be ex-
plunged from the official record OF debates.
Mr.. German objected 10 tho present con-
OF the motion and 1t went over
till tomorrow.
Mr.. Brown said he intended 10 say
something in reply, but as the matter was
TO go over he supposed he would be hesfd
Tomorrow. He did not wish It TO 70 I'M
challenged. lie did not intend that any
OF scquiescence by him should be
from the fact that the MISTER was
goiu COVER.
Mr.. Butler called uD bis resolution, of.
fered some days since. providing Tor ex-
OF New York banks by n CON-
OF tho eenate.
Mr.. Morrill, moved to refer 1t to the COM
on finance.
Mr.. Blair favored the reso-
lutioD. and eetd that IL the
comptroller Of the currenov was not
doing his duty concerning the bank he had
withheld his activity too long.
Mr.. West eaid the Marine National, Met
ropolitsn ka,ional and Second National
banks Of New York, failed with deposits Of
many millions. The people bad been
sWipdled out OF these millions. He in
ouired what the comptroller OF the cur
renew had been doing while these banks
were piling their swipdiing operations and
mekine false statements under the eyes OF
!. NJ. Butler referred to the recent defalcl.