Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1884-07-19
LEGAL NOTICES.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF
! L Sacramento, State of California. II is or
! dered than notice is hereby given to all whom
itmay concern, that the State of California has
! commenced an action TO escheat the estate OF
| JOHN SMITH. deceased, which estate is de-
seribed in the information which is made part
| of this notice
In the Superior Court. county of Sacramento.
| State of California. THESTATE OF CALIFOR-
SPRINGER, GEORGE MADDUX, JOHN sKEL-
| TON, WILLIAM GROSSLY. NJ. HANRAHAK.
| GEO. F. BR0NNER, JOHN DOE, RICHARD
ROE, JOHN DEN Defendants. The above
named plaintiff. by E. c. MARSHAL, Attorney
General of the State of California files this in
| formation on behalf of the State of California
! First-That JOHN SMITH, resident foreigner,
| ana native OF the Kingdom OF Great Britain,
died intestate, on or about the Sd day OF NoVem-
| Der 1888 in the city of Sacramento county of
| Sacramento and State of California seized and
possessed at the time of his death of the follow
ing described real estate lying and being in said
| city county and State described as follows:
| Lots one, two, five, six, seven, eight, ard the
east . feet OF lot four, in the block bounded by
| K and l., Twenty ninth and Thr.icth streets;
| lots one two, three and four, in block X and J.,
( and Twenty-eighth and Twenty ninth streets;
| lots one two, three, four five, six seven and
eight, in block NJ and n and Twenty-sixth and
TWenty-seyenth streets; a three-aere tract of
land next east of Thirty-first street, between j
and K streets OF the city OF Sacramento, if ex-
tended.
second-That John Smith Jr.. and John
Springer, defendants, foreigners and natives of
Of the state of California, at the time and prior
To the deeease of the said John Smith deceased
and George ModduX, NJ. Hanrahan, George F.
Bronner, William Grossly, John Shelton, defend
ants, aud others whose names are unknown to
plaintiff, and are named by fictitious names as
John Doe, Richard Roe and John Den, defend
ants, are all now in the possession of said real
estate, claiming some right therein adverse to
this plaintiff and against law.
1hlrd-Ihat all the relatives next of kin and
heirs of the said John Smith, deceased, were
nonresident foreigners and residents of tho
state Of California at tina time OF his DEATH that
he had no wife, no children no descendants
or next of kin residents OF the State of Califor-
ma at the time OF his death capable OF inherit
ing, of succeeding 10 his estate at the time of
his death, of which all persons and camants
nave notice IN and by virtue OF the records OF
this Court.
Fourth-That by reason of the foregoing fact
stated and the law in such eases the real estat
of John Smith, deceased has escheated TO In
state of California, plaintiff herein, and tina
the state oi California plaintiff, is legally the
owner thereof and entitled to the possession o
said estate.
Fith-Wherefore. the State of California
plaintiff herein, asks and demands Judgment
of this Court declaring that said estate has es-
cheated, and that the State OF California is in
law the Tightful owner thereof and entitled to
E. c. MARSHALL.
Acknowledgement of California.
Per s. p. SCANIRER of Counsel.
And it is further ordered that this notice be-
published in SACRAMENTO DAILY RRCoRD-UNIoN
a newspaper published in the city of Sacra
mento, county of Sacramento and State OF Cal
fOrIia, for the period OF one month, requirin
all persons interested in said estate to appea
and show cause, if any they have within for
days from the date of this order, why the sa
estate should not vest in the State of california
June 20, 1884, JOHN W. ARMSTRONG,
Superior Judge.
lsEAL.l CHAs. NJ. CoGLAN, Clerk.
le2-2plm