The Waco daily examiner. [volume] (Waco, Tex.) 187?-1888, 1884-07-27
THE GRAND PER-
No Important De,
Testimony CT
Evidence of Col. J
Bennett and Nr.


what amount. | thinl
papers in both cases.
whether both ainou
the same party. hut oi
,cntcd both firms.
made. No bond wa
was prepared. | a
whether il was
! don't remember the
the a tiidaVits prepared
wv recollection il tina
executed by Major II
cipal or n grantor.
Ny recollection is tina
notes was long ovcrdl
member a. to the 9th
amount was $500 or )
member the amour
knew MIR. I;aIstou.
office two or three lin
10Th, or about that iii
ing the papers. The
pcrs were not 10 b'
further consultation.
consultation was. that
on with the attachincl
| gave my client the
had not sufficient s
attachment. ! read
lining the grounds. |
cludcd not to proccc,
ton. | don't rccollrc
IL To why we conclude
Question Wa- il
client could not or
the affidavit?
Answer No. that
reason. | never pa;
him.
Question second ]
into and form II part
not proceeding!
Answcr-l think
reason, because lac -ai
make the affidavit.
marked that he had k
; ward Mr.. II. and pl
little slow. | have II
an attachment when
r. doubt. | was not AN
| attachment. He sal
toward MIR. II. and
slow. but he could
affidavit. llinclnna
t said that if any one
would prosecute
- United States Cou
i and would make
And upon his repeat
guagc, he said very e
e "A significant nod o
II meant business III
or three hours before
l. ton issued and had
a hands of sheriff liar
sion is that | was coi
notes from which |
Is limlnary papers the
II same day or evening
II. certain which. Tn,
n. don't remember. l'
.r anything to him to e
N. the remark. No one
office at that time.
was sitting III the
90 may have heard iii
" MIR. II. went out. |
r think MIR. II. said thi
lust before dinner.
@. son to see sheriff ili
.r execution of the -
~ been returned. H. | !
turned on the prom
hr would pay by tn
Up his honor. Andcr,
III execution returned.
IL n new one to be is
| think Sheriff
~ between and >
tc remember whrth,
T.. threat more than on
nj pcatcd il rs he wen
AT the same intcrvit
cution rs quick n
Il The evening before
T." my client had given
IL client remarked tha
~ take very active p
" prepare the paper
re- | saw my client in
| came to my office
ire there. | think | pr
hr. that evening. 10
rs add affidavit WRITE
Is oi'tlc 10Th. before
interview with me.
said anything To VI
tnchIucnt. | never
ing to attach. lie +
we were several cred
am considerable stir.
ust the Exchange ont
nd DIST. Mr.. II. told
ids before the 2lst tina
ed; had II receipt Fl,
ed; show | got it on
,an Mr.. Harris and Nj
mr. office and Harris :
full lrrcd him $40. |
ore Sl60. | agreed to
hat sheriff. may hav,
of to my office, and
nth had paid him 81
called for $40 orr
have repeated tn
evening. | thin
mark such H. mo
m affidavit without
AR, in the evening, ms
ind for the atlachInen
IN in the evening. |
aud in the office. He
We pay and would /
ash they would give |
ock morning and even
all his property "
~ reached except !
'"f' had turned hi, |
Waco state Bank
pay all his credit,
and him alone. | e,
or money out of VI;
ult: from the time fills
DaN issued. lie always
red / don't think TIA,
aco hurried me AT all
ark ton. | know | ii
zen an attachment wa
ven. II was the threat
WA, caused me to hav,
col responsible for il
NER that the attachm
a.
like operative cause of
ion execution in con
our matters. On cNa
We made this staten
En- had gone out, and |
ter looked at my doch'
.ws, caused execution Il
the him for the money
the March, and that on
,tcd gave me his wore