The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1884-07-12


No. 1870.
THE object Of this suit is to procure a
i decree to set aside two deeds of conveyance
OF Il certain farm in said county; one made by
William McAllister and Susan, his wife, to Anna
Elizabeth McAllister, dated March 2s, 1882, and
recorded among the land records Of said county
in Liber J. A. d., No. 4 folio $50 the other made
BY said Anna Elizabeth McAllister to said Susan
McAllister, dated April /. 1882. and recorded as
aforesaid in Liber ]. A. d.. No. 4, folio 49,, as
liam McAllister, and to sell said farm to pay the
debts OF said William McAllister.
The bill states that the said William McAllis
ter deceased, was in his time ind ebted to
the complainant upon his note dated uly !, 1885,
in the sum OF sl55, with interest thereon from
August l, 1880.
Allister on said note, February 2, 1882, In the
Circuit Court for Cecil County. and on the 10Th OF
June. 1882, obtained Judgment thereon against
him for the sum of $4,000, with interest thereon
from date of Judgment till paid and costs, which
said Judgment, debt, interest and costs remain
unpaid and due to the complainant.
That at the times said note was gwen and said
suit WAS brought the said William McAllister
owned said FARM which is particularly described
in the bill and its accompanying exhibits.
note the said William McAllister by the first
deed above mentioned conveyed said farm to said
Anna Elizabeth McAllister on Il stated consider
alton OF love and affection and the sum Of SO.
That afterwards the said Anna Elizabeth HE
Ailister by the second deed above mentioned con-
viewed the SAID Iarln 10 Sllu susan McAlllStcT,
wife of said William, on a like stated consider
alton.
That at the times said deeds were made the
said William McAllister was insOlyent and had
no property but said farm that could be applied
to the payment OF the compliments claim, and
that said deeds were made for the purpose Of
hindering, delaying and deirauding the com
about the collection OF their ju.t debts against
said William. and that each OF said deeds was
made without consideration. and that both said
a ANN hath Ira .Iisfar . tba
times each OF said deeds was executed were aware
Of said insolvency, and of compliments debt
and OF said purposes, and OF said want Of consd-
GRAFTON, and that said William had no other prop
crty applicable to the payment OF complainants
That on or about the month OF December, 1882,
Susan, and seven children, w.. Norris Meal
lister, Anna Elizabeth NcAllister, John b. Nc
Allister, who has 3 wife named - McAllister !:
Thomas p. McAllister, Syvilla Schooner, wife OF
Charles w. Schooner Lewis q. McAllister, who
has wife named Eva McAllister; and Lydia
Emma Condor, wife of Newton Condor, as his
only children and heirs at-law.
That the said William LETT last will and tesla
msnt OF which he appointed the said Norris and
Lewis the executors, but which will did not dis
pose OF real estate and that letters Parliamentary
thereon were granted by the Orphans Court Tor
Cecil County TO said Executors but that the per-
sonal estate let by said William is not sufficient
to Day the specific liens thereon.
That William IL. Ross William NJ. Ross and
Edgar &. Ross, partners trading Ms W. 81. Ross X
Co and George Il. Evans claim liens upon said
farm OF the nature and extent Of which the coin
plainant is ignorant.
That the said Charles w. Schooner Syvilla
Schooner his wife, William II. Ross, William NJ.
Ross Edgar e. Ross, and George q. Evans reside
out OF the State OF Maryland.
A petition filed i'll said cause also states that
since the ming OF the bill oi complaint the COM
plainant has discovered that the said John b.
Nc Allister - McAllister his wife Thomas
r. MeAliister, and Eva McAilister reside out Of
the State OF Maryland and that two successive
subp9nas issued IN this suit against them have
been returned mon est"
1t thereupon adIudged and ordered this sth
day OF July IN the year 1884. that the complain
ant by causing copy OF this order to be inserted
10 some newspaper published in Cecil County
once q week Tor one month before the 18th day OF
August next give notice to the said absent de-
iendants OF the object and substance OF this bill
and warn them TO appear in this court in person
or by solicitor on or before the 18th day OF Novem
Der next to answer the premises and show cause
il any they have, why II decree ought not to pass
as prayed.
JAMES A. DAVIS,
Truo Copy-Test: Clerk.
July lift JAMES A. DAVIS, Clerk.