New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-06-21
EVIDENCE AGAINST MR.. EMO.
TESTIMONY OF AN ACcoUNTANT-cHECKs SIGNED
BY THE PRISONER
rBY TELEGRAPH To THE TRrBUNE.i

TESTIMONY OF AN ACcoUNTANT-CHECKs sIGNED
BY THE PRISONER
tBY TELEGRAPH To THE TRIBUNEi
QUEBEC, June 20.-There was an interesting
sitting Of the Court this afternoon in the Emo cass The
application made yesterday in behalf Of the private pro-
secution for p communication OF the information LAID
originally in the case before Judge Monk, refused
On application of the Quebec Bar. AssisantDstrict
Attorney Adams, OF NswYOrk, placed on the same
footing members OF the Quebec Bar, and was allowed
10 act counsel in the for the private proseeu
ton. Mr.. Allan, OF NewYork, accountant, was then
examined the inspection which he has been making
for time past the books and vouchers OF the
Second National Bank His evidence this afternoon was
entirely with reference to three checks the second
National Bank, which placed in bis hands by the
private prosecution The first OF these. dated January
II 1884 was in the handwriting OF the prisoner, and
signed John C. Emo, president OF the bank IL was
for Sl25, COO which was made payable TO COTE X
Rande stockbrokers OF No. go Broadway The witness
produced charge tickets slips in the handwriting OF
Emo which made out instructions TO the book
keeper the bank Of these instructed the entry OF
S25 900 a demand loan COTE Rande, and $780,
600 to f. :. Harwood, and such entries he found
actually made in the books OF the bank In another
book, known the demand loans book, he found a
similar entry in the handwriting Of Emo.
subsequent entry also Ia EnOs writing purported TO
represent of $4,000 by COTE Randle. but the
balance OF 100000 has not yet returned to the Oahk
and stanwood applied to for 1t be denied any
liability and said no had never received sncn loan
The second note was for $4,000 sgncd by Emo and
made PAYABLE to COTE & Randle dated May l3.
1884 There was entry whatever To account for
this amount and the note subsequently guaranteed
and paid by william Walter Phelps and Amos K Eno'
father Of the prisoner Tue reception Of this evidence
based upon this objected TO very strenuOn'y
by defence The ground that 10 not SPECIFIED III
the warrant but allowed by the ludgt SUBJECT 10
the opuosition Of the defence, which was nled.
The guaranteeing ~ this note was rendered nece5
sary said the witness IN consequence OF EnOs reSiS
nation OF the presidency and the discoyered detciI Oh
50 OF which several directors undertook 10 pay
their proper proportion Tho witness f0IRd no
entry Whatever in the books OF the bank
OF this amount any Justification lot
the making and OF this note For some DAYS II
WAS counted the teeT's cash The third note pro
duced was for 100000 in favor OF Dyc CO., stock
brokers' and also OF 80 Broadway. The note was dated
Septem % and purpOred 70 represent Time loan
Entries In the books showed that $4,000 was pad re-
spectlyely 10 W a. Randle J. e. Fraser d. Cooke and
j l. smith The first y, these said to be lawyer AZ
No 81 Cedarst but when -earched for was not 10 De
found j C. Fraser said by Mr.. Dyett 70 nave peei
a former Office boy Of his d B. Cooke could not DC FOUND
anywhere and j. l. SuGth another Office boy Oh NIX
Dyett. The court then adjourned I'LL tomorrow.