The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-05-11

Some Real Good sunday Reading.
AUSTIN.

"a IHisHs Whl " WILL Nv Nh0s tCi
Of the Dol1re Lard and CstIla company OF
Au.uu gss flied 70 day, capital s,ocR, 81,
600 GOO incorDoratois, W. y. CarotheTs, q.
Starlight and W T. SosTight
Mr.. Jacob II Fisher, assistant tregsurer
OF the Galveston, Harrisburg Il San Anto'
pio rnilrnud psid 70 he treasurer to day
$50 7C0. oeiug the amount OF intefeet and
s,uking funn QUO % the school iund ON the
school losu. z j. L.wlrst, Of the IuterDa.
tinnai Il Great Northern railroad, paid
10 700 into the same fund
Tue camptr Her states there is ia iransi'
tn the arconnt OF The general reveu ue
about 1900 CO.,
An official comm unicstion has been re-
ceived ~ the anjutant generals office that
Colonel B ylor with detachment of iaG'
gers has arrested eight fence.cutters at
Fort Cbsdhcurne, and they are now con-
6ned ia the jail a. Runnels. They are toe
men VINO for the las, three months have
been depredating on the property Of Colo
n Oiom.
The artillery companies havo on one or
Two occasions fired their guns bv permis-
siop. but no complaint WAS made; last nicht
~ attract special meeting, Two shots were
fred. To-day II wig disGoveled that soOe
vilsin or malicious psreou hnd spiked all
tour pieces with rst.tail flies Tae cannon
were on uisie gronDd and tire Travis ertii.
levy have never been fequestad not 10 irs
them, or evel remove tnsn The citizers
ora indignant at such nn outrage.
Ia the matter of the hoslirstion fol
maudamus in the case Of Wells ". Little,
field ct al. from Lampa as county, ihs
,upreme court to-day eu,erad this order;
"rhe ci.ra of This court will issue tho writ
~ mandsmus prayed TO-, conmmandinp
iaS iadso hHp si the d,,.ilct A SSSf0afo ooSIt o
tine seventeenth jpdiciul circuit. to render
judgment IN favor or M Msrshefi Wells sgai sI
George w Litilsfield aud mis- sureiies on
r. plsvin bond Hugh Lewis and G.. q Dill.
worth. for the snin II $500 with 10 pei
cent. per anrus intsress Irogi August 20,
1891. in = CASE now on the docket
OF said cur, numbered 453, ent tlet
George W Litilef i'd We. Marshall Wells
which cause was on appeal reversed BY ou
said supreme court on the day oi june
1888, and rsmabded 10 tne sid distr q
court. with directions as to &c flu disposi
ton, and to that end be 81
aside all orders OF the sai
district ocnrt entered up since tn
S,h day of Deoember, 1888. in sal,
cause, which In any manner In eyfe,e will
tho rendition Of said judgavnt In acoord
auce with this writ, that ne appear before
| LIST day of Jane Droximo and show cause,
any no ba., why this order and writ hav
moi been oneved The CLERK will also Civ,
notice OF the issuance Of this writ 10 th
said Littleti.,d Lewis and Dilworth
who reside in Gonzales couoty, and TO A.
8. Fisher and Walter Acker, attorneys fol
paid Lltt, field 10 said os,a. The follow
Ing is a briei Statement. Of the facts relaiiv,
tn this case: Wells T. Littlefeld sued Ia
recrver u stock Of cattle ,.questered from
hin, which cattle were placed In his handl
40 the o operiy If Mosy & McNuity TO ee
cnre gebt sac Wells by them on note
rhe case wss tried by toe court without q
ia ana judgment rendered against Wells
| from winch he appooled. The supreme
iurt rsvetsd j that judgment aud re.
mardsd the cause with diieItious that trt
lowe cour. ente M indgne in favor o
Wei IS against Ltflene.d ard his snretie'
upon mis- repleyy bond tor the agent OF tnt
not and acquired interest. In receivinl
the mandate frum .he supreme
court. The judge entered judgment
a. ordered ny said court, and
on motion OF Lit'lefield granted him new
t,ni on tho ground of newly disccye RED
-v,denns. W-ila flied motion asking
Judgment avaiust L,tltfs snd his sure
les in compliance With the mandate opin'
iou OF the sup eme court which motion
was refused ard this writ ~ msudarus Il
prsyed tor to compel said distric Judge tc
Grey the m .noate of the supreme court.
Tue cour, of appeals eversed and re
mandrd Burton 70. the State, troM
Mitchell; Gonzslss vs.. the State, from Tom
Green.
Reversed and dismissed I: Zweife VS. the
S'aie from Cnmanche. (swo css.s); Hsr
rold q, Al w. tue S.ats, irom Callahan
Alier vs.. the state. rom Psio Pinto.
Affirmed: rerss q Pse,dc railway We
Anu, rson, from Fspn,n; Bsuerton. ct al
vs. BUCK, T. Lom Dallas; Caro- a vs.. the State
from Kinney; Adsms 70. the State, froH
Comsnohe; Trevino vs.. .he State, from
Klnnoy; Kssnan w tne State, from Uvsld'