davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13

in other words he had chosen @ find fsaii VIII ths
state Of the Chicago mind which dd not prize above All
things Ia particular form Of mental culture winch TIE
critic valued highly, the criticism woqd nave Como
further % prove the critics prOyincialsn IMAM he city
Phllistlnisn Chicago could very well bdys an8sefea.
bridges and temples houses, grain elevators ana ff-
roads evidences Of state Of mental cuits tLtD
which there higher, and gone on her way OF wen
asked. Have you read "Obernanni she could nave -
piled: Have you built a lOcOmOtivei Tie wissst men
go 10 learnnOt % teach Something the Uiest man can
teach, but a0t much when his kE0Tedge IL compare
VITA the wisdom aud experience which TIE rest Oh tns
world bas M store.
Tue clever satire upon the fobles 0f the vOtares ~
culture exposes. not the thin ~ the culture %
Chicago society. but the hOlOwues- Of the posing
culture whose followers aud advocates can readily 10
supposed expressing views and sentiments similar
those forth In the ingenious decepton has
tracted nnch attention. We all know what genuine
culture Is and who 10 high priests But here
mock exhibition OF culture which could Dot be ~
uyIshed from The real article V hen the
make diamonds, % what value viii the dian Onis b.
We think impOsturP committed In tnc Of
Matthew Arnold has done %. much % draw the Inc
between true culture ald the assumption 81 cutge -
Mr.. Arnold himself could 10 There IL real learning,
knowledge wisdom experience. There are real lovers
truth But the light has carried further nin The
darkness ny have followed single phfh hsrs-
records OF the earth There Il The real
learning winch consists o. knowing much ~ one thing.
assGpji % learning which results from trying
10 know little ~ many things. Il u worth Wlie then,
To try o It Id an fObermanus'
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
IL ALITTLE TEMPER.
From TIE Eoehes'er b'i9oryat

How So many newspaper from Chicago to
Boston should have been deceived hT me article said 20
have beeu written hy Matthew Arnold and published III
H. Pa N lorna. cIlL.ziu- American civilization t-
exhibited Doe te Queen Cify ~ tho Wet, only be eL
planned upon thc theory that Is charges against me
american people 1It Nfu founded. A more inpndrui
ul-G!.r. arl feeble literary fraud never pcrpe-
trtted Only the dcu.r.t iruorance of Nr. Arnold
writings and she most needles, peui-u 0f the article II
SELL could ua l,daLy one t0 suppose i1r moment lAAt
O. Was ta, lI.u production NJ Tie apostle OK sweetness
aAd LIGHT.
External evidence alone should have aroused TIE sl
pc0l of tle victims of the Fui-ar iMDOatuie Ia lur
nr-t place puIppred 10 be- from The columns or me
Pal Sal J9rl0L There i- 10 -IDA paIt. ia me WoIin
There g. 90 lqH Nal Gl-ee. The Boston Adrcrflser ana
TIE Cbila0o TTi5tue. thinking that some mistake had
been made I4 trsrul. sion or flc article py cih'
credited % Tie I;N iil ln-rtS They seemed % have
thought That Mr Arnold uupuuUp.cd enough % ~
regard ls nzerru- uldc before D. sIDd homo that he
dd not intend write any articles on books on his Fslt
% the I lited states.
The mteruaI evidence % mpo,tUre does no; seem 10
have struck VIII! tie slightest effect tho mind, oil tAcse
two allie Icpre,ol az as rr and western cu4ll4
and CIVILIZATION Fave tnc use o.. the words culture anu
Pll.tui III. which hy The way DO not have inc meaning
mar ST. Arnold attaches 70 them there Is nothing In the
afcie 10 .ug.rs. the cleag-cu in-yc sparkling, TO
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
HAVE YOU READ OBERNANN'

The search for Obermann' may cease. The
cOp das may be returned % the Shelves The book
sellers wt longer be Piled with unp-onJacle inquiries
for volume which not IN the market. 10 wac case "
a demand eTsung without a corresponding supply Inc
OF the Librarians has been raised The votares ~
culture who thrown into agony ~ safilstrst
because Mr. Matthew Arnold mad pierced joint IA tAer
nrmor with the question: have You read " Opeihadhf
will relapse into the OF rehabilitation which begins
aud ends the knowledge chat they cherish Ia secret
To- from the grand total Of the WOfd eAge9ctu
which has been undiscovered, mistad, tossed ASIDE or
gsteu by the OF mankind There Il no Pdh II i't
JJafu4f Mt Matthew Arnold has not written paper
upon Chicago. OF held American en- tire up 70 me us
az least public. asked, Have sou read OD-rhdhh
Let as return to our dreams. - "a,
Bat watt a moment A study o, American ne ana
habits purpOrting 70 be written by Mt hattuoS AhOd,
the paper upon Chicago neither new PIoiouLu nor
important. As an impOsture practsel nt more a tue
expense 81 Western newspaper than 10 the lsouAt ure
o. certain poron Of American society, inc deception
wa, not only clever or could not nave deceived 80
many hut e had positive value and corrective force
VINE her the author shot his arrow over the house
stood with back the target or taken deliberate ain
lie has scored a bulls eye all the same.
HAD Matthew Arnold, any critio actually comment
Ell upou the assumption Of culture In Chicago and eK
pressed surprise thai Ia the person should be com
blned tse ability pack pork and studg Fhihstnism OF
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
DID THEY NOURIsn A VIPER ,

Frou o let,ar in The Chjr1go Tribyrr
Mr. Matthew Arnold the apostle from the
land OF suobhery records tie most melancholy proof
OF the utter absence culture In this Western country
that the few gentlemen OF Chicago OF whom he asked,
Have YOU rrud Obeuuauu t' had never read IT,
Nj Arnold himself however, IN note 10 his poem,
Obtlmauu," states: -@ulucoIr l. little known IN
France h- own country and or France b. f. almost
unknown. And Mr. -ant-buTv, in his sketch or Flench
literature characteriZC- SfuaucOW q weak mOraIst
who echoes the Thought of Rousseau l. this the solo
test 10 decide our culture or PhiIl-tinl-u
In Chicago there has been hol-trd uo cunant with en-
blazOicd as-cIu--tdr, OF culture but We has stand
ard ~ etiquette floating above We expect those Who
receive orr entertainment win return uS gnciousu"~s.
but this expectation rapidly IoW- smaller and beauu-
fully less Tic more that English celebrities rub against
An we'll - Nlr. Arnold mission i- 20 show Hight '
solely bur he call himself also on apostle %,
sweetness - The Chicago Literary Club threw wide it,
doors receive and entertain him. 10 showed him ahec
non ana esteem III brought tears his ewes by affecting
remark. recalling memories of Li- loved father lt-lcr
dIv in hi, article in The Irit"tr are cynical .git-.
alone for tho club i'm characteristic English good taste
Does he believe the Chicago Literary uh dog WHO
loves his master I'D the more for few kicks
More pointed than this attack. however arc w.
AruoI- brutal tErusts beloved and culfurod ccrsl
man who lad entertained 1f. Arnold aud his fdmil y
her. 4 Ike rIdoue-- the ouiu.uI.sf chicago %" n-i
mon -or" would hlu.h 20 hear bis pork mercer 20
brother had committed
Have we -nouri~ted % v.per1 Evidently The itto mp
nraclfiou faf u tIi- country for Mt Arnold "a lee
r-r aud Che criticism (which our press hd- passed upon
him bias cnttercu tnat sweet soul and furnished That
r..
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
POOLING WITH SWEETNESS AND LIGHT
FroEa The Sorinaaelt Union.

THE NEw-YORK TRIBUNE published. a few
DAYS ago either A. Joke or belated April fool. what
purpOrted 10 Dee 1Ir ArnOds impressions OF CMeagO
II was very clever oaricature Mr. AnOd- idea and
not at all c.mpmentary 20 che pork packing city Now
there Is PdH Nal Journal a. most newspaper eOr-
know. but The Boston Advertiser thought TIE TRIBUNE
had been caught mapping and made the article the ID
ieci OF learned editorial. carefully correcting Pau MAJ
J0uy7sdi 70 PdH MgH G0-stte, and Inserting before
Arnold Mr.. Matthew" which THE TRIBUNE mad
omitted The funny man of he Ne,o York Times gave
himself away il aud yesterday morning Inc Bosom
Hrald followed with three-quarter- or column 81 \,
solemn editorial reflections "the mere money getter-,
taking Mr.. ArnOd'- criticisms ~ Chicago a. a text
And now The. ChicdgO Tribune with the Whoe
article reproduced bodily under shreknZ mead -he, a.
it, special cable dispatch nom London. tdt iHt
J0,nra l. carefully corrected to- PW hnU -ehe ana an
editorial article expresses the natural Indignation OF
Chicago the low estimate OF is culture by the ny per
critical migrate who prefers sweetness ana ueht 10 COM
mercidl prosperity and Obcrmann 10 ham,
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
IGNORANT or cHICAGo's INNER LIFE.


NT Matthew Arnold L. writing a series Of
papers for London periodical giving LIS mp e'-'. p,
America II II amusing 90 note iu what very snort iht
ana under what very superficial circumstances JLc,
English tourists and writer's master all there l ol Nt
lea and American ufe and character and how quick Aey
are 10 write them for publication M home. OMc'-J
l. tine theme on MI Arnods last paper and .s course
dude IKE De sneers- at CMcagos culture md social
life of winch he had scarcely any opportunity Jo I"rM
Am intelligent Judgment except from what he chanccd 10
see OIL be- an at the public uOtc ~ the public street. su
IN public hall. , ..,... A.. ID. .. . ..+
fer of focf ne ior1uf to-day " chicago lnnef nhn t
Ter ffc ~ me- wa- before spent lees than jvcnty-iour
waking hours ia looking it's brick and stone ais az h
reryl evipg less than half score Of lf- reifriht
men Indeed. 10 fair 10 say that Alr MhttAr" AihnH
h A. incapable .Of passing correct luiEirh up"A NH
cago i'm nv respect whatever since lis brief visit here as
he was before be had seen the city lie pietuoA
criticism A. simply piece ~ impcrtLehi p,ILl tv-
lie might a. well nndertakeO describe me mirhet] d
the elaborate structure Of sieam-eneine ar d
very nasty glance al the exterior ~ the boiler IN "h o
mohve-power is generated 90 undertake To- pas nos
nept upon ChcagOs intellectual ANA hOcno ehi - u
tcs after the exoeedingy opportunities nc -. o.
forming an intelligent opinion OF any DouJ OF '4! INNS
whatever IN Chicago ,.t. ,-,..fd
The disgusting lfconceit and egotism OF ,lr Arnold
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
NO NATTER ABOUT THE GROCERY.

There was time when Americans We're
exceedingly sensitive OF the observations Of Englslmen
who made free ~ their hospitality and went BACK To Ing
land and sneered them That tie however, Is past
and Mr. ArnOds COntr butiOn5 ~ The Pal MAJ Journal
VIII not cause much excitement There i only one hlng
the first cOllWn OF impressions which we care 70
notice lust II devoted 20 Chicago ana u recall
evening a literary club, where pleasant niue
paper on the subject OF Phi,tlu-m read aud Mr.
Arnold admits that he was much interested In H. Upon
inquiry to the calling oI the writer he Informed
he tells this tho British guest easily be seen with
single glass IN eyo and uOstdl elevated" that the essay
list was the owner OF n large grocery business Well
what Of II the paper good did nc grocery bs-
make 10 worse II II were any other than an as
thec evangelist who told this, some people might say
that he who turned mp his AZ the grocer vas
snlh end" Or whathO they cal lt. YOU know
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13

bust stvc and thought ~ English ossnyst From
first 10 last II s. feeble. rabby, ncoherent and grossly
impotent and udcrous The writer started out 20 mad
one or two OF those leading principles sol when crit
csm Il in seach" but he forgot his aim II he ever
had any as he dawdled along, and clOscd WIN Hcky
piece of tahy. with which he supposed That ne would DE
able 20 c0unteract in degree the effect OF his I'M
beetle remarks upon the Infatuated Chicagoans HOW
well he succeeded may De Judged by tDe oolha OF ell
tOtla ana epsoiary abuse that ,he nCHsD 1PeI7 n'P
upon the head and shoulders Of Matthew Arnold ,,
Can any one believe for moment mat Matthew Arnold
wrote such commonplace rot as THIS tlat ne used ne
word dispense IN the sense o. pIeaeHn3 tnat . NJ
combined the adjective diluted with the substantive
rhetoric and produced phrase that is destitute o any
exact meanlngi that he stole from the penny -Iher
phraseOOgy such verbal combination "a writ large as
1t we're - Il any can, he must attlbute to Mt
Arnold the inexact writing and the silly efforts NJ wit
OF miserable scriDber. judging from the iabri-
Gators mention of timed meats, PORK anu gram
hc must be the market reporter on some metropolitan
Possibly this market reporter has heard Of Mr. Arnold
possibly he read three pages or hi nine vol
OF essays and poems but not more Tor ne ma not
the rrmOtest Idea Of Mr. Arnold. conception OF culture
and Phstinism. He does NOT seem 70 snow tnal nj
Arnold never talks about the things Of culture Inc
sIO-tic Of sweetness and light always speaks OF (ul
itself aud by culture he means familiarity win the Dtsl
to receive ideas assniate them ana dct upon thel
Pmistlnlsm i Just the reverse OF tls IL means Hol
only ignorance and stupidity but iEdsI O.on 70 become
einancipated from Ignorance ana 7Iupu. IN IN ih
tne IL unperviOus tO ideas lie Ohthes anu aoho'
them But such aBcreature Mr. Arnold dld MOI; aeg"lu
Ing 10 the article IN question ira IN CHlcagO me lu,
beers OF the literary club, where he heard peasan Htc
paper on "PEistinsm." seemed 10 De ANXIOUS 10 seI
new IDEAS Although they were succe7-tul traders, as
he found by inquiry that fact does not rs the Iah-
Gator seemed 10 think when he wrote his article make
But there IL little need OF carrying the analyst? OF the
article any further point out thnl e author uos Hol
know how Mr. Arnold uses the English Language. mere
j. tte need either OF endcavOrng 20 refute the story
that Mr. Arnold went about Chicago OF any where cl'c
asking people n thew had rcad Obcrmann and con-
cudng from their ignorance OF that they were PhiS-
Arnolds standard OF culture IL not familiarity with
fnlr - a IA rrr1prV de %
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
" DISGRUNTLED.'

Matthew Arnold is dlsgrmtlod. and proceeds
10 rub his public Upon his recent visit to Chi
caeo his audiences somewhat slu, from the TACT
thar tEetWu great rival opera companies were OuorIhg
greater attractions than lectures on Sweetness ana
Light" bur Notwithstanding this De had iliI audiences
But two duller drcdIIcr lectures lad not been de
Hycrcd during the year Ills Affected aud INDECENT man
uer was generally commented upon. No single person
who heard had desire hear his second lee
ture. But he was distinguished stranger aud was
treated courtesy. Upon hs arrival hc driven 20
one OF hospitabc aud cultivated homes on the
North side Low lie teaJ- such Coulle7ic- can best DC
seen from his vulgar article written FOR The IH MdH
Cgsfc II Matthew had \ lied into lis hreeches pocket
thousand more good dollars tEln he dd 2- result D
his lectures we doubt not bUt shat would have ttd a
marked effect Upon his estimate o. tho culture oil CHI
CdgO.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
IS TITS A HCMORIsTl

FI1U IN Ia TfTITI ~ ITIUTt
TIE Nrw-YoRK Tribune printed. April g,
what pUrportcd % Dee Mr. ATuois impressions Of CHI
cago, written % The PtH MN Journal Many news
papers -uppCsug that Journal OF the ordinary
i-prnt- in THF TRIBUNE and that Gazette was Intended
accepted tAe paper geuuueespecaly 20, the time for
April FOOL Jokes had gone by. r. seemed Incredible THAT
Mr Arnold would have commented on Chicago people IN
fashion drter receiving their hospitality but 10 was
almost more ncrcdib- that newspaper Of high char
acter would indulge IN such hoaN-n personal hoax.
not clcdab.e 10 American journalism under all the CIR
cumstlnces 0f Mr. Arnold, visit Tue IElBCNE's con-
r-ou " it@ imposition hardly overtdke and cOun-
toract IT, grave ruputatiou Mr. Amod- .good-en-e
n voluntarily put itself into The list OF newspapers
whose news must De suspected
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
WHAT HE THOUGHT ABOUT IT At FIRST WITH
INCIDENTAL REF ERENCE TO HIS Own 2AGACII1'
LI.LLu Tna m lIfl-i. n D LIZ D

BUUGi0
The people who are surprised at Matthew
about the man. WithOu. doubt he found there thln
veueerng culture scud base OF PhistnisIn aud
~ matter course lie says so The world expects MN
20 eve his impre--iOns Of America. and he VIII give tnen
quietly plainly and honestly. They will nor he duted
with Hes compliments and they Will uOl De EN-
FILTERED bv prejudice hatred They VIII De IN
rerf-rf, because Arnold saw but -mal part ot AneL
can IL and saw u hastily but they will Dr. worth the
&C., study people far a. they 90 Arnold tooS
r1 pains make himself popular while ne was mere ana
Vs. feel tempted repeat this point what we said al
TO be simple forward and honest; and he told the
truth 4 people who Ike % He cejOed and deceived
The first thing he did after he landed 70 lecture 20 a
New-Nurk audience the doctrine that the majority Is
wrong. aud that the only hope of the race
e. tie mere remnant OF the wise and vrtuous. In
a word. he attacked the fldam-ut idea
Of our Government or course thcro was
a fall4cy ~ his argument, and his main
cOnclu.i0n was wrong often happens with hin ;
but Away happens with him, De Illustrated MS argu-
with uuuberess side truths, presented quantity
and fcre.by, and edvend the whole matter Win the
sincerity NJ scholar What be said Wa worthy of tue
study " the nation but chose 10 take coming
from q politician. not u thinker lie becomes IN the pop
uar eyes the who hates republcdul-m Instead OF
The who loves truth He followed up TINS piece ~
honest 20 chere by going 90 Boston, where e hIl eFoy
reason eTpect strong literary cOcric would rally
round him. and there i.rtuIu- on Emerson Win
judicial Guinness that mi sht become critic OF ne next
lecture about the sage ~ Concord hundred year. from
now. This was Ike splitting 10 The high priests beard
and Arnold the support OF New gland culture He
treated politely, but al enthusiastic p-rt7ausiip
disappeared AS n struck by sheet %, black lightning
a. Dee did descend 10 cant or caOlery while le vas
among uz there reason suppose tllt DE Will re-
either that hc hIs returned home We regret
thar Arnold aid not more Of Amera but chat part OF
which he did stands n the worst need Of Htte
discriminating ana fearless criticism aud seems likely TO
get o sd.utdry dose OF IL
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
THEY DON'T THINK MUCH OF HIM


II i to be regretted, perhaps that Mr.. Mat
thew Arnold has not vervhlsh opinion Of those Of Chi
Cages people whom he seems 70 regard - rcpre-eniitl' G.
but NAV he that the dislike is mutual. and that our
folk do not think very much OF Mr. Arnold. As be has
embraced the first opportunity 10 let Us aud all the Wofd
know just IN what esteem cor contempt Lee holds U.s. sc
hope he will not consider 10 an impcrtinencc u some OF
citizens shall say precisely what they thnk OF NM
M Arnolds small audiences IN this city we're not AT az
dltt,ring 10 his vanity. especially when be compared
them with the one he az Professor swings church.
may be feeling o Jealousy that induced MIN 10
sneak di-parHgiugy that reverend gentleman. The
fact Is. of solid brains, Professor swing Is th
superior OF Matthew Arnold. ana. besides, hc has thr
good sense and the good TASTE not 10 parade lis eE0
teal suicicHcy before the world, as Arnold delights
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13

Matthew Arnold says, ia order 10 test Amer
car cllture he asked many il they had read ODER
"a poem OF MS paM.,Rlgd some ne e4ri
tEat hardly anybody had ever even heard OF
-Oacrmuun." Now. n the rcadlns OF Dit, Arnold 5
hooks some % winch are as heavy lead. IS 4
tc.t OF ones culture fear the number 0f cultivated
people j. exceedingly small even IN his own country
Ne can conceive that there may bc very cultured
people in the world both Ia Europe and America. who
have NOT even heard oi existence OF such an individual.
a. "A tft4ew Arnold
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
STILL ANOTHER WICKED AUTHOR

II the article IN question l. q hoax, The
T.,a1I believes that would pu' IT, aud upon the
shoulder OF the who pcrpclatcd the fraud by slap
tlug upou tho back tie ludiNduJI-a Chicago e1-
nreaclrr. journalist and lecturer-WhO some years
ago -ccc .sfur p,pctr1tcd sluar hoax Dn tAQ puDt
by rub shin au alleged letter from Thomas Carlyle ~
MI auv To- getting the tender OF an honorary degree OF
M. D. from Harvard College. The Carlyle letter Wt- $50
ch.r..fari.tsAv fro that great wufer- peculiar style
aud temper that 30 deceived even those who were mos
familiar with mis- writing and ,hc may De- said OK
the alleged Arnold production
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
SAVING ITSELF on THE HOME STRETCH.

From The Rochester Express or AOr l0At me end Of
column o seUers dispDDrCr1i u MG'',e1o ATn0'd.
The public Is not edited to see him run his
sores In HE daylight and since he ha- begun the digging
Of his grave the Western papers can perhaps be e3
cused for such evident willingness As they EXHIBIT 10 ad
him in finishing the Before the public accepts the
story a. fact however II Will nrst have 10 De
shown that there any such newspaper IL London rs
The Pal nal JJulmdi that Mr.. Matthew Arnold l. tie
one referred 20 plain Mr. Arnold: and that the wh0e
thing l. NOT "A hoax of The NEW-YORK TRIBUNE, pub
hshed a. a bait for easily-gulhbe journalists Every
with the true character ~ Matthew Arnold that II is
prng that trained newspaper did not instantly re
fuse TO be hoodwinked.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
WHAT He THINKS ABOUT IT NOW.

The letter itself purportel 10 be the work
Of Matthew Arnold. AMI it was rot published in
TIE IElHrNE on the first 0f April. quoted
from paper published on that day. but from
one said 70 De published on ATrl >. We confess
thar " the letter wa4 not written by Arnold be
contained opinions vcry.he what supposed Ills would
clever fellow; but the Journalist Who printed orig
na has advertised his natural bent toward deception 80
extensively that his utility a campaign lar VIII De
greatly impaired for several years 20 come.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
OH. on, 1.-THE wAus OF ToADIEs.r

The great city of Chicago j. not deeply at
fecred by hag:in Of few toade- who ohtided them
~ yes upon Matthew Arnold representatives, Of the
cifvs best culture Mr.. Arnou- inference from Vhl he
saw Is unjust 20 tho Intelligent and uupIcj"utousy cu-
treL portion Of society mat Lu aid not see hu az even
NOR. courteous man might have bean misiei by some or
tJo.e Inc met and CHICAGO VIII attend 20 u- timed
meals" and other n0urshuC Industries but little d--
urG.d by ls critic aud not greatly distressed over
the walls OF the persons who feel hurt.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-04-13
MI. ARNOLD" ALL EIGHT; CHICAGO ALI


Though Nj Matthew Arnold published
comments on certain supposed types OF Chicago culture
are manifestations OF Remarkably good taste, there IL
mucu moro than a grain OF wholesome truth IN them.
and the evidence VI this Is furnished IN the abund
ant bad taste a. say nothing ~ tie bad temper tLa mas
been displayed by number OF persons who come for
ward with confessions THAT they have been h ana hurt
by the shafts pimed by -he too critical apostle OF sweet
ue-s and light"
What rather plainly appears, hut no more plainly IN
the comments OF Mr Arnold on Chicago culture tndn IA
those Of Chicago culture Nj Arnold, s that The apostle
Of sweetness and light was rather unfortunate az least
ia Instances In Ie-pe, ~ the representatives OF
culture and seutsAdlaess Ot mind that came under
lie II.lLl.lp al \ LfLIl.