The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1884-05-24

The original docket-11O cases-was prelimi-
narily called.
The case of Robert S. Corse VS.. John Register,
ST., ct al. countermanded, and in that of Geo.
A. Stevens Daniel Keller fiat nisi was entered.
The trial or civil docket-19l cases-was called
preliminarily and judgments by default entered
for the plaintiffs with leave to extend the same as
against the defendants in the following cases
John G. Sidel VS.. j. Pearce Richardson and Robert
Royston, Lineweaver & Bro. VS.. Croft Bros,
Woods & Robertson VS.. Thomas Shanks, Seligman
Herzberg vs.. Charles F. Cole, HeinrichC. Tieck
VS.. Joseph Twink; J. Crawford Lyon ct al. VS..
E. G.. Leitch Gilmartin Doyle VS.. Edward II.
Roberts; Sebastian Helldorfer vs.. Ernest Tuercke;
Abraham Lehman VS.. George Wennewetch L.
Jackson VS.. William 7. Jackson; James Hall,
&C., VS.. Edward P. Patterson John W. Burton
vs.. Samuel N. Wetzel; Willard G. Milburn VS..
John l.. Barranger; Emma ]. Royston We. John
T. Street; The Rasin Fertilizer Company, of Bal
timore city, VS.. Jacob B. Bull James Button
VS.. Adam Seelig, and August c. Buzby vs.. John
Schultheis.
Other disposals were made as follows Philip
Walsh Sons vs.. John Moore, garnishee Of
George Horn judgment by confession for plain
tiff for costs. George Merryman VS.. the County
Commissioners of Baltimore county; removed to
the Circuit Court for Howard county. Thos. j.
Higgins VS.. Vaughan 4 Co.; judgment for plain
tiff for $ll9.62. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
use Of the county of Lancaster. We. j. +. c. Tai
bolt off. George Hawkins Williams vs.. John
NJ. Curtis; judgment for plaintiff by confession,
on terms to be filed. Lemuel L. Lynch, admins
traitor, &C., VS.. Edward N. Matthews Judgment
for plaintiff for STEPS. The Maryland FertiIiz-
ing and MaaSsgpSasetqrng Company vs. Joshua
Same vs. Jacob F. Keller judgment for plaintiff
for S12795.
The magistrates appeal docket, thirty three
cases. preliminarily called, jury trials selected.
continuance made, &c. The peremptory call of
the civil or trial docket seventy six of which
instant Assignment for that day-Nos. l, =, Z,
8, SO 81 43, Az 49, 81 "a, Sc, IS, SO, GO, 65, &c,
81, &c. 70, rs, II, Is, 70 and 81.
George NJ. Manager VS.. the Consolidated Gas
Company of Baltimore city, appeal from Justice
Pole; judgment below for the Consolidated Gas
Company for S4,320; affirmed by the verdict of a
jury. C. V. Cherbonner VS.. VIM. II. II. Billings
ley, appeal from Justice Walter; judgment below
for Biilingsley for $21; agreed. Gilmartin &
Doyle vs.. Edward II. Roberts; judgment extend
ed for plaintiff for $1O2.S3. James J. Mccain vs.
Henry Shirk; removed to the Superior Court of
Baltimore city. In the cases of Henry Kidd,
James A. Parker and Sarah Sampson VS.. John
W. Royston, demands for bills of particulars were
filed.
George N. Flack VS.. Stevenson A. Williams,
administrator of John I. Ayers, appeal from
Justice Henry; judgment below for plaintiff, Ayers,
for $40; verdict and judgment above for plaintiff
for S44SO. Moritz Sacks VS.. c. Daulong, appeal
from Justice Hevern; judgment below for defend
ant Daulong; judgment above of non suit. VIM.
Akers vs.. Henry Boty, appeal from Justice Storm ;
judgment below for plaintiff for $40; agreed,
each party to pay his own costs Caleb v, cher-
BONNER VS.. II. g. Chase Co., appeal from Justice
Pole; Judgment below for r. G. Chase & Co.;
judgment above of non suit. VIM. Morrison VS..
John L. Crise, appeal from Justice Pole; judg-
ment below for Crise for property replevied, namely
black stallion horse appeal dismissed. JOHN f.
and Laura F. Brown VS.. Seigman Herzberg, ap-
peal from Justice Hevern; judgment below fol
Herzberg for $9l As; appeal dismissed. Stephen
and Daniel Hurting vs.. Seligman Herzberg; ap.
peal from Justice Hevern; judgment below fol
Herzberg for $94.77; appeal dismissed. William
J. II. Gluck VS.. the Maryland Central Railroad
Company; appeal from Justice Pole; judgment
below for the Maryland Central Railroad Com
pany ; appeal dismissed. Adolphus D. Gordon
VS.. VIM. II. Cox; appeal from Justice N. r. Dor
sey Judgment below for Cox: that he keep the
goods repevied; appeal dismissed. The appeal
docket was concluded. James Hall, &C., VS.. Ed
ward P. Patterson; judgment extended for plain
tifffor $ll3.17. Emma J. Royston VS.. John I
Street judgment extended for plaintiff for Sl1O.-
so. John G. Sidel VS.. j. Pearce Richardson and
Robert Royston; judgment extended for plaintiff
for S119.15. Charles C. Cook VS.. Susan and Car
one Baughman; case docketed by consent, and
Judgment for plaintiff by confession for $3.50.
The petit jury was discharged on Wednesday till
Monday, Goth instant.
Thomas Richardson VS.. T. Monroe Richardson
judgment for plaintiff for $4,000. Mrs. Amanda
M. Hawkins filed a bill in equity here for
divorce a mensa ct horo from her husband, DR.
John w. Hawkins, the ground OF alleged
cruelty, and also asked for an injunction restrain
ing him from disposing of or interfering in any
way with her own property. The court ordered
the injunction to issue. The complainant wa!
originally Miss Novel; and her first husband
was the late William r. FRESHMAN.