Savannah morning news. [volume] (Savannah) 1868-1887, 1884-02-13

Chatham Superior Court.

The Superior Court met yesterday morn
ing at 10 o'clock, Judge Adams presiding,
and the following business was trans
acted.
State VS.. VIM. Singleton Larceny from the
vessel. Verdict guilty, with a recommended
ton to mercy. sentenced to four years IN the
penitentiary.
State vs. Richard Butler. Burglary. Plea
of guilty entered, and prisoner sentenced to
seven years in the penltentlary.
State VS.. VIM. Z. Deubler and Charles
Harper. Assault with intent to murder.
Verdict not guilty.
State VS.. James T. Fogarty. Malpractice
IN office. Verdict of guilty rendered and SEN
fenced to pay fine of 500 and costs, or serve
four months in Jail, and. IN addition thereto,
he to be removed from the office of Justice
of the Peace.
Martha A. Crosby VS.. John Crosby. Di-
vOrce. First verdict rendered for ibellant.
Mary Il. McCarthan VS.. Barnard McCar-
than. Divorce. Order granted to perfect
service by publication.
Tauulah Warner VS.. George Warner. Di-
vOrce. Order granted setting aside dismissal
of libelants motion to amend libel.
Ellen O'Brien VS.. the Skidaway Shell Road
Company Motion for new trial. Rule nsl
granted requiring plaintln to show cause, II
any She has, at 10 a. IN. on 18th INST. why
new trial should not be granted to the defend
ant.
In re application of Robert P. Warner
and others for partition of land. Decree
granted upon motion, and request OF all par
ties in interest authorizing the partition
prayed for.
Messrs. w. Scotia Tison and James H.
Lewis were appointed and commissioned no
taries public.
The petit Jurors were discharged for the
term with thanks of the court for their
promptness and strict attention to their du-
ties.
Court adjourned to 10 o'clock this morning.
City Court.
This court met yesterday morning at 10
O'Clock, when the following proceedings
were had:
Patrick Manning VS.. Michael Daley. Judg-
ment for plaintf on attachment for $2l1 So
principal, $l4 IS interest and costs of suit.
Charlotte Dittman. eXecutriX Of the will Of
Edward Dttman, who sued for the use of
Leeman Dittman VS.. Max Elsenman. Judg-
ment for plaintif in the sum of SI99 "a princi
pal, so u interest and costs.
Same VS.. Moses krauss. Action on account.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of 1891 is
principal, SIS 81 interest and costs.
Same VS.. Max Krauss. Action ON note.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of 1897 SO
principal, $64 10 interest and costs.
Henry Suter VS.. Christopher J. Zealy.
Action an account. Judgment for plaintiff
for $50 80 with interest from Feb. 2, 1888,
and costs.
Henry suffer VS.. Joseph F. Zealy. Settled.
John II. Taylor vs. The Central Railroad
and Banking Company Of Georgia. Settled,
John o. Ferrill, Ordinary, for the use of
Lucy Gallie and Charles II. Galle
VS.. John Cunningham principal,
and Charles II. Olmstead, adj
ministrator of the estate of James McHenry.
Judgment against both defendants IN the sum
of SO. O55 Sc to be discharged and satisfied by
the delivery to the said John o Ferrill, as Or
binary, for use as aforesaid by the SAID de-
PENDANTS of two shares of the capital stock of
the southwestern Railroad Company; four
shares of the capital stock of the Central Rail
road and Banking Company of Georgia; and
5000 in the certificates of in
debtedness of said Central Railroad
and Banking Company, of Georgia, with all
dividends and interest that have been col
lected since Feb. l, 1888, and the payment to
the said John o. Ferrill, as Ordinary, for the
use as aforesaid of the sum of $2,035 10, with
interest from Feb. l, 1883, and costs of suit,
within sixty DAYS from the date of this judg
John L. Hardee VS.. p. Bandholtz, John
Schou. claimant. Order for sciere facias to
make parties the death of claimant having
been suggested to the court.
John C. Cassidy, administrator, VS. Charles
Clark In this case the court rendered the
following Judgment: 1.-THE within cause of
John c. Cassidy, administrator Of Mary E.
Schafer. VS.. Charles Clark, came on to be
heard by consent of all parties without the
Intervention of a jury, and thereupon, after
proof submitted, judgment is rendered by the
court in favor of the defendant. Charles
Clark, and that he do go hence without day"
The petit Jurors were discharged until
Tomorrow morning at 10 O'Clock, to which
time the court was then adjourned.
They are Quick and Sure.
81 use Benson's Capcine Porous Plasters
constantly in my practice DR.. j. NJ.