Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1884-04-16
The Charge Against Dr. :. 8. rkond.

MRS. CARR TELLS IN THE POLICE COURT TO-DAY THE
STORY OF THE ALLEGED OUTRAGE.
The case against DIR. Samuel S. Bond. charged
with committing an outrage on the person OF Mrs.
Louisa Carr, OF 7l3 III street northeast on the 81
OF last February, called Cor trial in the Police
Court this morning. Assistant District Attorney
Thomas appeared for the government, and Mr.
VIM. A. Cook for the defendant. The court room
was crowded.
MRS. CARR'S TESTIMONY.
Mrs. Carr. who is fine looking woman. rather be-
low the medium height, blue eyed and dark haired.
attired in a black alpaca dress, trimmed with
beads, and wearing dark blue hat, trimmed with
Sky blue ribbon, was sworn, and testified that she
was slightly acquainted with DR. Bond. who had
called at her house, 713 street northeast. profess
sionally. three times and on the day I'm question
March 21th--he came about or 2% O'Clock. She
had sent for him to see her child. about fourteen
months old. In the morning her husband told her
TO go TO see Dr. Bond and she did, but he said that
he could not then prescribe, but would call in
the afternoon. When he came in the afternoon She
handed him chair and prepared To bring the child
down stairs, but he said he would go up stairs He
then said, after looking at the child. that
It did not need any attention. She then describtd
the assault on her. which concluded by saying that
the doctor succeeded in overcoming her.
On cross-examination by Mr.. Cook, witness said
It was between IL and O'Clock when she was AT
DR.. Bonds ONCE, and it after two O'Clock when
he came to her house. She again rehearsed the
story OF the outrage.
witness said she had fought him during the
whole occurrence, and did not consent at any time
Witness tried to cry for help but prevented by
the defendant, who threatened her IL she made an
outcry, but she did pull his hair. Witness first told
her husband about the affair the following Sunday
Mr.. Thomas announced the case closed for the
government
DR. BOND pENIEs
The defendant was sworn and denied the whole
story as told by Mrs Carr saying that after exam
lining the child he sat while and conversed with
Mrs. Carr When he left she went TO the door with
him, smiling. On croSS-eXamination the witness
denied that he had ever performed an abortion on
Mrs. Carr, as claimed by her.
Mr.. Cook said that he expected to show hereafter
that Carr had been inquiring as TO Dr. Bonds
property, but he would not Introduce any more
testimony now.
THE CASE SENT TO THE GRAND JURY.
The court sent the case to the grand fury,
remarking that It did not follow that the court
adJudged the defendant guilty.
CABLE TRAMwAY Casa. ii. Lighboll to-day
filed bill In equity against George f. Lemon W
II. Reed and ChaS- B. Flint and the United States
Tramway and Construction Co. for an Injunction
and specific performance. The bill sets forth that
plaintiff, on February 23d last, was the owner
OF certain patents; that G. T.. Lemon
and w. II. Beck contracted with him for the for
nation OF q company. TO be known above, with A
capital stock OF 000 for the purpose OF con-
struct1ng cable tramways, using his patents.
sued, to be divided between Lemon, Beck and him
self and they were TO bear all the expenses. He
performed his part OF the contract, but they have
not performed theirs, and he therefore prays as
above. Judge James issued restraining order, re-
turnable on the sd inst