The Red Cloud chief., 1884-11-07

49, ~@e - sSte e@E<
eos.sss~s ss<~A<av s~s - uss.~s rss~e
ira e@ast~ 81 Lua Nal
r~gayxttSs on asoruxs's vF.sxf-ss.
y poz txSvsfEs
Arsrsoa travelling &C . rssirusi CO..
RON nutassoa swkes iss~I 20 aanshsS
prrsoa cas NOD recptsr damages fcr M
isrses rexxftci tsroe<a tae n-ex<wses
IRENE .uafs 81 lsza "A sbS ua~ u
Way w. q. o. l. 4. ~ Go. 4adrs
Adan IN tkr uPsnua ressrs a. he de-
esaoa % The loser soars. satiaS
Ihe only resfssn rxssInE hwf~~-a
Fsluoa ani Tar cuEa AN "a =s b~~r
= dscei hy fFasL b. oa Bs
alpaea TO 81 Gp that r~tasas
q .sino Tho c~osnTans A. . bass ~ 20
fG very. he "a. thea. st ihs taas e
S<Ar Inerv. the ear ultto1i iko ssAss
- . pae.cnser. All si;h~u; tn rEh,
% 10 thrFv ~ all We 10 aCs az
IA; ih necessary tina; a pVrson sasad
fas far "a - saIiled IN ths ;
. pa~cns~f. 10 t. - Ec rai, = ps-
tcy Il be has The nscat 81 10
eusapsEy. fairy obssintd Hat 81,
tns wil claim tAat 4 uscrc tFc-
zscr has sRh uEh;s. ard i A.
tesrs % us o. D. Ncli ~u~i ihAl
dpnseni obtained et iragi Is equal
p ssilles
e4lEN oF sREpITOG;-.
II, Lao. the Er.i entry 81 al men, Il
a4stys ur,t lg.n. provided dae dts-
gtn c h. been made n making thc
10y. Ii j. also Tue - rsaois part
ptrs A mortgage az the individual
ptderty o! on partner WAs forr-
cats 1. an both IA Individual erred .or
AL . firm credt 2 ella mSd Tao .uT Jas
ns4n.y. b Ia had udgusent. the latter
bsfns firsi entered ihc former
eleued . prrt rencv n. an indsv dual
crtikor. bat was defeated. and carr ei
tht case. LONDON ~ hall Ia tlc
supaeme Z ourt 81 Indiana. who're Tho
"a dgsi-nt pa, u rmvd. on the lo.laa-
in4o,inion lii y not doI.ici that
thd ,enenl rule 4, that partnership
ctcS ii,rs ar postponed A. - individual
pruP p ~. sbd indis'du crcdltor. pre-.
frrSd but tins genera rule does no.
apply shers = lieu has b-cn obt. ned
b. Judgment rendered PRIOR to tho
cresekn of the individual debt
pKib LpERs-LIABtLiTY ~.
Inue CAS- If Bank 50. fi,kc, the
Sup6eIic Court oi NcS liampshiTr
heidi ttst Ia n sut against the stock
hoidSn of acorpora,ion under the stat
ute, u is immaterial whether n debt
for h>rei moncy. for the recovery of
whice the sui Is brought. vas beyond
the over q the corporation To- con
traettir the absence - fra ii or ,olu-
sion Z the part e the plant iis. IL
the c&Torstion received AMI used the
piainofs mency. IL j, al,o immatcriai
whe;ff r tho dcbt was contracted by
Offices proper \ authorized or hit IL
Is no u cction IL the maintenance of
such { suit hat tn. plaintiff. rave
commonecd % action nj law against
the coz psrat on fur the IL oyery OF the
same d.bt; nor are they obliged to nrst
eNhau4 their r medy against the
suretiet pa the note before calling an
the s~,oskholdcrs-
CogPoaatioS TRAN>FER of sTotk.
In tie recently decided case of
Robinson vs. National tsank Of New
Berne, ab, New York Court of APP.
peals h3lo that n provision n tho
statute tuidcr which a corporation j.
org:ni 81 or Ia it, bylaws r. uir-
ing tra1Dfers OF it- stocSs Ia b. made
upon. add WHERE the owner II sock
has assk and transferred Tor a
valuable consideration the certificate
issued 10 h IN. aud the corporation
when rc& usstcd T. make the tran fer
without : aid rcason refuses {, do 80.
this amdart ~ to "A waiver ot the re-
quircm. Is aud the transfer j. com
plcie. aet the corporation y bound
To recogoi q tho title of the assignee.
recis .lys1is, same a. 4 & hal done t.
duty sndtnadc thc proper entries upon
the books
vIFx's TAENiSGS
A receSt opinion Of the Supreme
Court IL 3'cnnsyls will -hUrk tie
sensibilitio. II fair IA n1ei people. be-
II dke os.s the fact that there Y
remains ID the Statute book, o. The
keystone s>tale enactmeut- whi h. IL
they do M SAVIOR If uarJarlsm. werc
based or j6esd ani injustice. Brefy
Pd0rsyivan as supreme Tod
hold. JUDE isxon delivering tie
opinion. tto, the earnings 81 the wife
belon 20 she husban ave ia certain
except onat Eases > e lhr'i ia yari us
acts OF the ksembly aud unless Il can
b. shown ttai there was a gIit by tire
husband l vii her earnings bc-
long 10 AIM
P.apM!IkbEY NoTE-ISUoHsER.
IN indorS on . promissory rot. il
ne than a surety. The
of kaorscnen mean. that tho
indorser vi par On The single condi-
n that tn &rnaker or ace tor does
An ind bsscr 81 a note hv no
20 demkni thea the holdcr sha
sell coliateraS 10 his possession anil pas
he no,s out Il oroceeis The I'M
iorser s dus = To paw the mote. and
then he him<sf cxueon.r 10 ihe eolIat-
erals. -SaprS ns Conf Of isnns,l-
amin
rnPe tHT~o kwAEp
A written /pfymon law award upon
, written al : - @. can not te m
peaehe. IN arS a ton D. law gppn .; by
.xtraneous Ell isnce. Dot n proceed
ny. simply IA the al ance Of CLAIMS
by tb& s,atute II I'm ,aiions--
Piece va. P{rse. Soprme tour' Of
New Hampsb4 r
nogusA.Klks sH1s oy NseSEE
The supreme toufto Penn 'lvaaia.
Of Ernest Hopk ns. holds that
he assixne. o. norsga e. unl - the
h15[r oppei himsef from
Inc defense. III IL e Z To all the
. ,ui; es with wkieh 6 VS. a-lectei in
he hands Of u , sissof. /,