National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1884-03-25

The proceedings in the United States supreme
court yesterday were as follows:
No, 62S. The Canal Bank ct al, appellants, vs..
Robert q. Hudson OF al. Appeal from the circuit
court of the United States for the southern district
OF Mississippi. Decree affirmed with COSTS opin.
ion by Mr.. Justice Blatchford
No, 25l. joseph ID. Taylor ct al, executors &C.,
appellants, VS. Albert Bowker. Appeal from the
circuit court OF the United States for the district
OF Maine; Decree affirmed with costs and interest.
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Harlan.
=, no. nv. Horace ID. Moore appellant, vs. Belle
tncd states for the northern district tS Of Illinois,
tice Field.
No. 2ol. Oliver s.. Garretson, appellant, VS..
court Of the United states ior the northern district
ofNew York. Decree affirmed with costs. Opin-
Ion by Mr. Justice Field. ,-,--.--
90, appellants, VS.. Samuel Thorn ct al. Appeal
from the circuit court Of the United States for the
Of New SS York Dg EsiS affirmed
No. 5S7, &c Alfred Slidell ct al, appellants, vs.
q. II. Grandjean, United States deputy surveyor,
OF nj. Reargument ordered on points specified An
nounced by Mr.. Justice Field.
No. 229. The Phoenix bank of the city of New
York, plaintiff In error, vs.. David Risley: Inerror
TO the court OF appeals Of the state of New York.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr..
No. sio. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway
company, plaintiff in error, vs.. A. L. White. ad-
ministrator, &c. Petition for attachment for con-
tempt denied, with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Chief
Justice Waite.
No. 725. johnson Hngood, comptroller general,
&c ct al, appellants, W. John p. Southern ct al,
assignees, &c. and No. 726. Johnson Hagood,
comptroller general, &c., ct al, APPELLANTS, vs. Amos
p, Williams. Motions TO advance denied.
No 1881 Jesse Seligman, appellant, VS.. George
a. Walser ct al. Motion to advance, pursuant 10
thirty. second rule, granted.
No. $40. The United States, plaintiff, vs. David
Waddell et al. Motion TO advance granted, and
case assigned for second day Of October term,
No. iio2. Henry W. O. Edge ct al, plaintiffs in
error, vs.. Vim. II. Robertson, collector, &C.; mo
| li6S. The Cunard Steamship company Qimited)
plaintiff In error, vs. VIM. II. Robertson, collector
pany Qmited), plaintiff in error, VS.. VIM. II. Rob-
ertson. collector, &C. Motion to advance granted
and cases assigned for foot of call, Nov. IS. 1884.
plaintiff In error vs. J. j. Knox, comptroller, &c.
Motion to advance granted, and case assigned for
argument after No. 627, on April next.
follows:
No. 1888 The Houston and Texas Central Rail-
road company, APPELLANTS, VS.. Thomas NJ. Shibley.
Nos. 3i7 to $3.50 and 4SO to 49, inclusive. Calvin
Amory et al, appellants, VS.. the Memphis and
Charleston Railroad company ct oil. Continued
by consent OF counsel.
No. 1863 The ST. Paul Minneapolis and Mani.
ioba Railway company. plaintiff in error, VS.
David Burton. Advanced under thirty.second
rule.
No. 1915. John B. Ally, appellant, VS.. Eliphalo,
No; III YIN. Astor, plaintiff In error VS.. Z. A
Merritt. collector, &c. Argument concluded.
NO. 21S. The Liverpool, New York and Phila
delphia steamship company, plaintiffs in error
VS.. the commissioners of emigration. Argument
commenced.
Admissions to the bar: William NJ. Barnum
and J. G.. 7. Foster, of New York city; James o
Crosby of Garnaville, Iowa; Chester A. Snow, OF
Washington, d. G., and Leander d. Condee, o.
Chicago III.
Adjourned,