The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-01-24

rsilroad comnany hiss been rendered o. snh
rejected by i've Pniindrlphlsrs Nc, >,
Cs,sst hos positively declined % near
Lumner al, propositions thn' hsNp 49,,
mate to nin - iHke ihr presidency Wl wv
company. lla assorla thsf ne SUI Hnt''SS
h. the resolve he made when pc t', 49,
from the yios-prsr'dency ~ VIC Al
wanna Iailrnad o1mpnny to ft'fn pm
soliyp pnitioipilnn ip railroad dntrs'
N undrfNoot that tue prfsidrnpi mas ns'u
/ terderrd "a aud declined by me inho"lrt
p@utirmfu: Chsr'Hmnr e Tower, q, ~
I Wright, John n. hhlitl ana joseph
/ Pnus, OF thr poits lifolnefs Iron com pAll
suntriuientenf shnrne, nl lhr l. lul',,u.'
Texts and d0uthfTn Railroad, states ina
/ trAnk-isy ing uu tHu line has nHrn o'mpi''
/ Ted wlihln q mite aud hfh oi M"s,'"ll.'
ana no uxpruf- 90 reach ihiI place ss'ul
say ui.ht. TnH will open The tohn 10
Mfmphis. A distance ~ ftysN milrs, sna
/ "a Train will be- run over % Suuday tor 'hr
/ first time By The L.. of hsroh, II ~
| Thought. the lire win on c1mplet, % 10
! ClHrssylle, leaving gap 81 nrlV hl',nn
miI,sin ools he,",eu Nc" pLIoln' ~
| Mrmpha. lNrniy fhpu.Aud men 80 "A.
work oE the road, a. IL expected thAt
T. though trains viii be- running o, stay l.
Replying 10 'Lr question, what DO "a
Ite.ard ns the OBJECT M bululhk N,'t
! 81 orr, Vanderbilt sail; TO blackmaI Tue
New Iurk uentra, inero vas 40 herd pl
the risd. Tho West Slure VII nave 70
tstenll tho New Nlrk ufnliNlH put,ne.s
In this shio ga earn thu 81 GOO necessary 10
nav inc nurrt,t.uu exc .. s,s aud interest GA
the bn.da lttlU New York Centred i"is
The Yves. Snofr frt rs blaines' ~ VIZ o."
bpcausr am turred nut Of me road, nave
often said name SUMO property tHM "hh
good tJu YEAR, ego THAI 10 not gpou now
and IL yoa can ssmr something on.ihe-
ting within ten yestb tHal ~ COCA row, " ~
au eycep,ion II viii axe Ten yehfs 10 nut
he W'st shoTs ON a sound basis. WI
!nfd, who equlrted up and then squlrt.l
down, WAS In tho West shore. He might
better have dcvusyu his ftleniion moro ei-
elusivoiy'to mis- OWu properties
"You defined what the altitude OF the
New YORK Central would be II yon w.fo
not turned out. what do you mean ny
that AR. Nandefbilt?'
"Wby. nave not neld the controlling In.
t.rest FOR yeart-not since | sold my Large
block. That was tour or 1--we years ago, !
do not own oue.iourtA, mr. anything lhe
it--uo, not une-slxth. II the STOCKHOLDERS
can hnd sly other b:ter sble 10 run the
road than idg folks tney can turn ne out.
/ sold not 70 buy beck. WHAT TO 90 apou'
] the WCsl Shore WAS alkcd over Al q meet
ing three months ago, aud he tlocRnolurTa
concluded they Uanteo nothing 10 90 WIN
IT,"
,;onceruing the Coup Wabash care IN De-
troit. Superintendent Blown, Of The Michi-
gan Central fines y question inYol,sd no,
greatly interests railroad men. IL refer
sold he, ITO the matter of consequential
damages. Ofcourar railroad company -
responsible Tor the direct results oi care
les,uess on their part, and don't lhihk
! their contracts relieve them OF that respon
siblity. Int am anxious 10 know rhtth-
err a company can be held liable for injury
done TO q man's business Il Ehe circus had
q horse killed. a band wagon, or ohtrol
Knocked 20 pieces ard this vas tho result Of
negligence or care.essness, II is plain WIZ
they should pay the value Ofth property
destroyed. Dui they ray Comp wants 10
recover for the consequent loss to his SHOW
business. II "A man has his stock OF goods
damaged by fire, Hn INSURANCE CON pnny
pays him tue actual value Of what 10 lost
aud max good tine injury done 70 any
portion OF ihn STOCK dsmageo. Bat II
| H. costs him hundreds OF dol
lars to get ready Tor business
again, IL he mas 70 move, o. wait Tor a new
suppiy ofrcods. the insurance company
doesn't have snY added responsibility.
Bat then the law on me question will prom.
ably be determined ir this care, and Pm
sure To learn what " ~"