The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-12-20
STATE SUPREME COURT.
DISPOSED OF YESTERDAY
The Tribunal Adjourns after Making
Transfers to Galveston and APP
pointing "a State Bar Commit
see to submit Rules

TYLER, Dec. l9.-[Special.i The gu
preme court affirmed: Belo VS., Wren,
from Travis; Sullivan & Co. VIZ. w. d. !
Cleveland OF al, from Navarro; Calves
ton, Harrisburg X San Antonio railway
vs.. Gage, from San Saba; Etherldge vs..
Ethcridge, from Falls; Gillenw aters ct
al, w. Sect, from Cooke.
Reheariug refused: Heath vs.. Lane |
ct al, FROM Harrison; City OF Galveston
VS.. Posnansky, from Galveston; Stoker
ct al. vs. Bailey ct al, from Camp;
stephens & Andrews vs. Gainesville !
National bank, from Cooke.
Dismissed: lewis VS.. Alexander e.
al, from Fanuin.
! Reversed and rendered: Galveston
Wharf company VS.. Galveston city,
| from Galveston.
Reversed aud remanded: Risdgill
VS.. Oliphant ct AL, from Fannin; Jones
VS.. Andrews et al, from Bastrop.
! The following cases were transferred
! to- Galveston: Meredith VS., Coker, from
| Henderson,; Missouri Pacific railway
vs.. Watts, from Anderson; Interna-
Iional Il Great Northern railway VS.
| Smith X Co, from Smith
! Skaggs w. Murchison & Cole
man, from Henderson,; Stuart
,s. Western Union Telegraph company,
from Harrison; Aiken VS.. jefferson,
from Harrison; Keowno ct al. vs.. Love
at al, from Harrison; Brown VS.. Will
lam Chambers, from Cherokce; Texas
n st. Louis railroad VS.. FLOYD, from
Cass; Hawkins w. Cromer, from Nor
rus; Duncan a. al. vs.. Taylor, from Rcd
River; TCSas& Pacific railroad VS.. Tan
kersly from kaufman; Ridden VS..
Smith, from Navarro; Farrar VS.. Bee
man, from Navarro; Allyn & Co. W..
Willis & Bro. from Navarro; Burgess
/; VS.. Hargroye, from Hopkins; Interna.
tiOnal u Great Northern railroad VS..
Blanton, Nunnally d Co., from Rusk;
CAudle va. Parks, from Grayson; Ryan
. w Missouri, Kansas ~ Texas railroad,
o. from GrlySOn; Underwood VS.. Missouri,
4 Kansas a TeXasrairoad, from Graysnn;
House vs. Stone, from Tarrant; Parr vs.
b ConnOr, from Lamar; International g.
= Great Northern railroad Vs. Avertt,
= from Milan; Greer VS.. Howell from
$ Hood; Divaro VS.. Crowder, from Erath;
a City of Gainesville VS.. Wilson, from
Cooke; Hamilton ct al. VS.. Hurt, from
@ Dallas; Wiedonavers VS.. the State. from
{ Burnett; Texas e. Pacific railway vs..
y Harris, from Tarrant; Smith VS.. Miller,
from Fauuin; MatlOGk W.. Glover, from
rarraut; Western linton telegraph COM
y
A VS.. Crow, from Burnett; Smith vs.. Cas-
9 siday, from Travis; Pullman car com.
pauy Va, the State, from Bexar; Gold
9 frank Va. Young, from Bcxar; lntcrua
II tjoual & Great Northern railway vs.
= Raiuholt, from Milan; Delk Va. Punch
l. ard, II ON Hill; GUT, Colorado d Santl
u Fo railway vs.. Levy, from Milan; Viii
iams vs.. Robinson, from Robertson
Hammond VS.. Connolly, from Robert
son; Carrothers vs.. Mcllhenny com
4 pany, from Milan; Kennedy VS.. Up
q. shaw. FROM Johnsnn; Kennedy vs.. Jar
- Wis, from Webb;t State VS. eLeon, IRON
" Travis; remau vs.. Baker, from Gusda
!, luupc; H,rseberr vs.. Houston & TeNa
" Central railway, from Navarro; Han
:, rick VS.. HanriCk, tr IN Williamson
" Cage va. Mcilurd, from Erath; Mule
vs.. Boon, from Dallas; Wright VS.
Sraub, nom Erath; Lawrence VS.. An
,s dersOu, from Faunin; Hubbard vs.
-, Arnold, from Lampasas; Maytou vs.
" Texas & Pacific railway, from Grayson
vt Coleman w. Lord, from Donley.
Pr The court made the following orde
r aud, having finished its business, ad
dc juurnod tor the term:
Upon the request of the state Bar As
n, ISOLATION, IL Is ordered that a commilte
M OF i've lawyers be appointed to suggo,
Tn for the consideration OF this court sUc
amendments to the rules prescribed ia
the government ot the several courts
THIS state, ~ in the opinion q
II, said committee, may be advisahl
The following are appointed momhel
he Of said committees: Bon H. Bassett,
" Washington county, Chairman; job
ns A. Green, OF BeXar county; Thomas
Brown, OF Grayson county; John Your
~ GOOch, of Anderson county; Sam v
We Jones, of Galveston county. II is IA
" Their ordered that said committee repO
A.. to this court on or before tho first Mo-
N day IN January, 1886, mt Galveston; IA
mi further, that the clerk of this court fu
~ nish each member of tho commits
eu with copy of this order.