The Hawaiian gazette. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1865-1918, 1884-02-20
9awaiian 6azrttr.
wEnNESpAY, FEBIUAEY y. Ia.
Ssrreae cez-s ek the Hawaiian IslAzas--
In ES@aty. Special Tsr=. Dee - 1855
In EazceN

Czrt-,S 4 Co ~ rsSs FStNcEvrr.S PAM
SrtcN O..
-1sss e. i Ns9,sas srrs g-ssas .rt-tagass ,r a. sls
CIsrs ~ -'sssf G. =
Tbs III e os1Plai-s avezs hat sls Gs6sa3-
AZ ce-pszass,a s-ss, a. asTssasa; viii lie
-lsszsiss sases Narcs ls;. lSSs vhf,A IS IS
s,rtc5x
',wh<reas Tx FsSucerSlls plsristscs. oor-
rcSsssoa Ssty tGSlyl c-gsrlrss rus;eV ard b
virs-s e tie laws * the Havai,ss Nf-S3o-i.
as agreed e rS1s u Cezlss 4, Cs-. SseeAN.sS,
sos-c ti-ss7exS II Hcze'els. Oahs. certain
lasts ss.uste II Hx-.isS. lslsu5 q NszsS. Tex
IL pz-pc<s & eslsivssi.S gScs. ard she said
Fri-cSviiis F,Ez,SgSc7 CovsvSEy eeG sAe Sasi
Ct-lzz 4 Co d hs-sAy ssTss . sss., seal
al szcczse tsass Il iEr,sesss = ee hsSsat,s-
p-s-a-ei urc- sse terms x-G cs0SS,ico< - are
ss-satssz -A-'sG ,uG expressed The Friacs-
VILE Pl.-sxrSc- Cezrps-y sSges te lease frSr
sh-ss h--G-Si u Ssvsz k1a3reS Ee-s< q lari
= - useG cc}y u tie e-l;ivx,icc q Trcs AZ
saSS Hs-xlei. ard rzs Ceu,1- \ c., q thsiC
-rS1us. i possesses &C al ls-SS cve- th-se
hz1irci sc-sS Is secn as Re oa-eSer elects
Il & s., IL three e113geG ac-ss :, X taken
-cssskSs,a o. i---,e3s1ssly, te- Ire ssr- & Eve
yss-s. VIII = rz5vlisSs 81 a. e1ser<ss1 . he
ssSs lss<s tx ! further psvSct & 6vs wears
-p,z IL s1=S ss-zS All ec0&isie1S Ct Ire
--sssz. Is,se. II ghe yearly rectal x svcz.v
icll1rs rs- ScTs ray1ois c=Rrse-ly. Also thai
.he Fi1-szsScc Cc=r1ry vii TX lease Szv
cshs- ard = Hazslsi VsIssy f,z tie Purpose
q czi-ivzsi-- ne. - 1-y psESse q perSc2S,
ui.hczs ths cczsezs q Ch1iaz & Cc-s alsc 10
alIc- s1Si CbEta- i &c. 70 cut dead vso6 froz
la,s. c-ss6 g controlled by lie PiazsztiSs
Ccc,71-y &c fszcirS, ros-s ard hszsshc,i
-z-yoSs>, be; Ssek c=.ti1s ShAll bs So2s Sr6sg
he r4r1cerssss and ccu,rol Ct The Manager 6
he Filu;1tic1 CczrIrys also 70 tEg1ish all TIE
water recssszry fc- TIE eclgivst5c7 C sid issj
zs-h rics slso rzszzrSgs CF,,z IL lzr1< owed
cz c,c.rrIie.: b. lie Pizzss;isz CczeTs-y scr
IL ho-Ses S7G cattle C Chzi2r X Co U>s,S io
uc-ki-S a-s cuisivzrizS the iE-i; alSo ;hs. IN
svs-v c-s E--6rs6 1crss q lyzt. suc ssrsS
sail ts slic-s, IN; frse fo< e-ectics & HOSES
t,- CE-l1- y Co.'S lSocrsrS, sllzi sad Chulsr
4 Co shsii 80 sUbls. q zSS5-c the lsElS e.
arr r4rs she-sof rist,Es he cc-<sus II WIT
~ q sad PiA-sstic1 &C.. ucr II any r1s--sS
l s-.s-fs-e With tie Piszsatics labor. xlSo shz;
ths re-s e tie three hundred 1crss shall CO.
-succ % he SrSt 6sy q Agrii. l>>9, z-i he
5.tla-cs of said land % 70 seven bueirsi ard
trC-- date Y possess 5cs bsi-- -ivsr In Ui.-sss
wEs-gct- stc-
Ttzi rzrszz; - tlls aSrsSus-,. defendant
I 5v Is s-sz; c keeling. sbczt l>s Av-il. DE-
.jvs-sj 70 v,azsifs. al r.zirti5s ;ccS POSES
I sea e al land marked On > zap (Ra-rcll' : J
| IL. 5. 5. :, :. and Gsfs,i&n; stated . plata
Ji=s l. Vas e iks area e sec acres AID te-
| -t-Se5 re-. ths-Sfo-- That defendant 1hcut
Is. JCly.ISS,, delivered e plaintiffs ard pllla-
/ Us t,ck pcxssssScz q Lex :. CT sad zap and
I r---s r-af IL
! tat cyz-li- cher pieces then delivered ccn-
/ .1irs5 SOS acres and 6s-tr6cG vcas- Tla;
Pjaiz.i5 paid he rszs. believing that lie STATE
/ -'S-.k Eers tue g Isl April. iSS- That 10
I SC-vsy & tbs PRAISES UzS made a. Tie tIus Of
I 1--ss-s-i- hat rlKiE.i5s s1clcsst lie land
| zS.L f,2cs vt-r !. v1s delivered 10 then and
lks Tease rov s1cic<ss al ths Land a. any ti1-s
n shsir TcTssssio-. Plaintiffs suspected frCE
tie low yield that The acreage under ccliivaii11
49, isss iha1 Vas stated By te.eo3Aus and
czzxsG 4 szEvsy . bs C1ts by which i 81
rsSrS c2iy ScS.es 1c-eS sVs-e IL lisig p1sSss-
sic-- IA. then pikiuIifs refused 10 pay rs1t
Il claimed bv 6stsoiIzi CT SsS.5S acres, tgi
! r5s-et 10 nay &C 5es.Cs .cTsS AID demanded
Ct csss-l;N-i rspsyUsztS q tie excess ct zen
paid. psfsa6zz; Estcsst &c zceSgE tie rsrl
s5s-st C e Pay bseS lie excess AMI b.cusl
tc.i,1 n tie District Co1rt 70 recover posses.
sS1z CT he premises fer Ee--pSyueni Of rent
lie bill p-eys that tsfszi1-. ts ordered q
szscEts : lease fo- SoS-eS Ct such number q
1cres - TIE Cszrt nay sot 10 be in plziu;itFs
p,k.sssic- and Il order The defendant TO ~
bGcS sks excess Ct EsCt ard &c accsps the zrrelu
Ct rsns Gcs e. The blSis Ct SlS.os acres. fer a
[ frfcrctica sSzinSs tie SEit ard general rsiist
ne answer admits he agreement and ALICE
i substance ih1t isfesizni delivered. Nzrch
lsse, to pt1iu.ifs SSs > zcres q nee l1-i, ba
plzi-1iEs bei1- dissatisfied viii = acres thersc
= Eus1ii1bIs for rice, tefeci1ri took tLs-
bscs. IesviUS SIsls acrss II plaintiffs possss
sio1, hat Jelly lst- lSSo, they delivered Vlzin
: gisS 1zcsksr Tract Of 81 acres. and ghzr ihe
pl1iutI5s hSi STI acres. 6eiucsiDS acres u
hz16rsd - psr 7-rssEsui HERE uCCli renal
SsS.5S scrgs, Gu vhich rgut las Isca 6tl1uis
\ zui paid 70 April Isl, ISs2
That survey vas made beiore any Of q
premises we've delivered sni that whcu pcs
session vas given, the boundaries were rcjlg.
CT b Moo<8rrat ard hcsiliu,., AMI that plsir
& tIf=s 1c,spsej NcasarTat's survey. SID dsIi,
7 sb1i Plliutias s1Evsy SHOWS the area Of iar
. KEEP. IN p0sssssio1 By then. and AYERS that
large petition u the land 80 delivered suitzb
Ter nee ezltE-s has rcs been planted, tb55 &
tszGans hzs ossTsd 70 take back certain po
G tieus Q; l1nd lsfi idle by plaintiffs, bui Oh.
ustis-s are denied.
he rights Ct the parties bcrcll are d, Z
determined by the agreement. AMI q. 49,
= that Il o1Eht to bs construed as q lease
transfers the VCsssszicu OF tie Isni. sr77rIst,
4 The annual rent payable Per arrs aui e-,,si,
J tia cryen81;s and co1iisiC1s s-rssi m
he rsrs q tie SO aerss zss 10 bs-fn /
Ap-ii. ISSo, and fer the remainder I'D Z, :,
d. zcrsss tru1 date q possession given.
TsylUC's Landlord and Tenant, - q ---gf
--FrOu a Consideration Of the cases The ~
Eogid APPEAR to h, that # the izstrsu,s1, m
Tossing 70 = Al agreement for lease, Is Itss
4 trsusteT Ct posssS<ioa. whether Immediate
O. rsfaT,l, II Is = lease, although II crutzTrs
: stlls1la'lo1 fcS executing : Subsequent lease
For the three budrei acres 70 he taken -,
j, se.sico e iunsiistsly, Il seems 70 Be z5zI
TED y the plaintiffs that the agreement vas
isass. The plaintiffs urge that there
70 tenancy bssEssl the parties established 7
tie agreement beyocd this ara q land. n
tszi they are oaly liztle, for Use and oscau.
" tlels t1T Tie azcEut Of land oTsr three irutfrr
leres actually Ceczp;si b. then Tie defend
an cial1-s- hat tie plaintiffs should be holds
foT Tslt q whatever land over the SEQ &C..
vez delivered &c the plaintiffs
We thlnk tie pl1iztiEs are hound &c nav ~
- ~-1-zscE A4Ll Vas le4LFsEEl uT rrs az
fs1dszi and accepted BY the plaintiffs, sitbo,
reference as % whether the sane rs there
after plated c. ros By plaintiffs. This r1ul
however, be qualified HE Land must Be suc
, - = suitable foT rics Culture. The land VI
70 be '.1ssd o1ly II tie cultivation Of rics.
aid tbs Implies that Il ~. TO be nee Ian,
capable, b Al ordinary s1psniitgrs Of none
N PEsPsrziioa, q growing nee. The plain
N. were Rsi boaui 70 take land zhic
=Iih an extraordinary expenditure Ct lab
and F7cney might possibly be made to no
nee, bui l4ud rszsgzahly level 50 As to
easily laid cat IN patches and czpzbleof bciu
pat Under water as required That the azrs,
nsui vas 80 Understood By the parties i Ell
cent from the fact that the plaintiffs surrs-
dsTed ! piece Of land Of II acres CLos ~
Aoasarssts mzpl a. beiEs unsuitable fer M
aed II rs accepted by defendant II M
also ie land zpou which water couId BE- trus-i
7 iron ditchss OF streams couTeuisut and aece;
. slble- We DO net think It necessary in III
case 70 decide whether Il. words N the acre,
zszi binding the defendant to furnish al n
EsisE necessary fer the cultivation Of sal
land With nee, = cpzpels them to cut and kee
n repair the Necessary canals 70 lead KAT,
70 the land cultivated IN nee b. plaintiffs. r
! ths1e Is 10 slieSstiou IN the bill settirz f5rt
, any default q this character By the defesizul
Il might &c said, however, that IN dsfzult al