The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1884-09-18

d. | ||- L.HLM L#-. -|. DO |M"-
ftt...I ,ut .,II ..
~. ...,
.Y .
10y. TI.
, .I' .
u .
I.I..
.
,nj tist t.
H. 49, .rh.
'
pei" 1877. l
''
''
.- 49,, l.
' '''"
'"''
wy ''' .N'""'.
'.'' ny l',' "tI ~"
u.s. ,""'ip" y 49,
'"' a." 'i'-' 'u'n' ~ -
N"'' ll,'tnlSN WIZ h,ll ~"
l',' ,~'-'"ls'l 'N-'N ,',''V.' Us
80,
''' '."" '"N' " '"'-''
nv. .,lh 'Nlylln'" ~ ~ '.N'
''' w 800 :"
~ "''' '' ''l''''''' I'',','u ,l N'N'
l'' .' u ''u''', IVY u' ,.
'". l""sh 'l.vi"', vi
''''' w ~'''u'I 'unl
'"'' "'. wv '' "a. N' 'lI'l
1881 w 10y 'n'
.',l.' VI tn' 80"
'." :" 49," ~
~ W. .'''' 70 '''' 80 'hi'
v w, 49,, . '''', -. ~"
y" 'N'N' ~, '" ~, ''' -
~, 80 E '' "
'.'-' w. WV
~. ~ ~ r,,
Wv I'm r -,
!" '"'9 s"i ""'' '"','''f NV
'.,, - .'' ,riIl,. II.
'
.'"'" I" ~ - " ''' ,,''''', '"" ~"
49, r'' -, 49, W.
~, Il - ,,, NJ,
,,nuv hal ,rry Ilttir InGn,rrr. I,r in
,r,usrI vote nf 1851 over 1915 was IH.lgl,
which lluucock received g.Iii or
, IG-Ipp urr rpnt.. us ugniust u NOR ryut. In
his ritv,
These figures show that the largest In,
,rcasc of Unnrock's vote over TiIdrn'S
vas whore Tammnny cXertcd her inliiI-
nee. The final vote .h0ws that ~ rural
'ounties reduced their Democratic yOts
n lsSO COMPARED with that of 1915, In
S16 Tildcn and Hendricks rnrriol ~
,ountips; Hancock and English received
upiurlties In ONLY ~ counties, nllhuurh
he Democratic vote in New York rDuuiy
ucrCusrd lO,iS5 iu $50 over lS,b-nypr
u upr cent: vet tho Democratic yutc or
me rest of lie State shows nm increase /
4 1,UTT ONLY, or less than onc-hulr of 1
.er cent, The same gain of 10 per cent, |
State in the Democratic
.otc that WAS east for MIN in New York
ounty would have carried the Empire
tate for Hancock by II larger majority
han was given Tildcn in 1876. Ii will
Il thus apparent TO any unbiased mind
hat the defeat of Gen. Hancock cannot
and no fair minded man who
'ill examine these figures can doubt
he entirely loyal support of Tummany
lail to Con. iancocK.
Win These SANDERS resting unop ne
hriiryrd i'm rrnnt mari ever bv tbose
are inclined TO admit our influence
nd mower M n nnli;irnl body. our
moments were alart and prcparnd for
: at Chicago an atmosphere Of duubt
nd suspicion, through which all our
cts were to be viewed, and while we
,e,e celebrating the anniversary of our
ational independence our opponents
every OCCASION 10 lltlll'iltt me !
linds Of delegates to Chicago against
8. We presented our ARGUMENTS to in
iyidual and assembled delegates of the
convention, and were debarlrd
10 right to speak, except by consent of
.,loga.cs from other States, and we're
under undcmocratic unit
lie from cgStiur orr ballots for the
lndidates of our ]cloice. We failed
ut in our duties to our
,ns;ituents who sen us, nor
tLn marty whose rnnrosnutntives
n vyero. and If any mistake has been
ado IL is not of orr doing and cannot
!, charged TO rs. The candidate OF the
marty hawai- been nomin-
I'D f~niinwiuy ma uniform and mn
rrro,I of our or,anigoiinn wa'
nuiosro i'm the will or The inrii y or
va erroyent.tivns NJ thn n,r,v
+ bough we brIicvo fth!,f
in tn have heen unvisrIy
inroesnJ T'hn,e is hut ono ,,tnrmoti,,Gc
II 10 saynT. o,,r -cn,,nortinn vim The
=, nn.ratic n,r T,Lis ~ nnrrnt nni
-, onG ;,dr,innt wo oanr,t nrrsna
, ~ "ir w. in," W. ,fmin v,n IN Ii
a ~ W. uoi'T," n - 49,
'ni,'VG 'hu En.%G az ,|on n'h p"us
Wv UH -
Ino'' p1"" 70 ''VIy nnu w
.nIiesce in. although protest
,I orainst. the unwise and
''f1ndicious course which they nursucd.
saW witI, I'm Adams that ..Ihern
no Good government bmt what is Re
,hIicsn FAR tba Renuhlic is the rmnire
+ Nv. mi NOT of menU
Mist,E"s Of men cannot blind us to
~ hrn,,ties and immortal priuciples of
a. namnrrntic marty. and for the
orrot,I.tion Of ihese prinrinles orr
cgpniyatinn was established. lis found
s nrntootod or9;nst tho mou.r.hial
po,n ~ 10 Eoder,iists ana we
u.s. tbe samo Standardization Of
P t,,or IN tho R"nmhlican Marty today.
10 bnlieve in The retention Of all con
. n; nna ga Ia ruards. tbnv wonld de-
""io 'Nsu 'I;