Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1884-05-14
WALSH'S STAR ROUTE STORY.
Continued From the First Edition.

WAISTS TRANSACTIONS WITH BRADY.
In reply to questions, Walsh again explained his
moneyed transactions with Brady. Peterson,
another mail contractor, had some postal drafts
to the amount Of s15OOO to be divided between KEEL
witness, which the latter refused to buy: After
that, at different times, witness advanced Brady
which Brady 'snatched" from him.
Mr.: Stewart wanted the details Of this 'snatch-
ing"
HOW BRADY PoCKErED THE NOTES
The witness took all the notes, memoranda, &c
OF his transactions with Brady to the latters house
Witness laid the notes and memoranda on a table.
Brady took up the papers and notes, looked at and
handled them, and finally claimed that, having in
sls5OOO which was an Increase Of 10000 for three
years, that his lBrady'l share was twenty per
cent GEM year OF sns sS8 lor Tn snree years ana ne
Walsh. He also claimed that Walsh owed 5000
as an assessment to the fund for Influencing Con-
uon In this way Brady figured his Indebtedness
to Walsh as Cancelled, and put the notes In his
pocket Brady said Price and Others had paid their
assessments Witness threatened Brady that he
would 60 into the courts, and the latter told him
to go ahead, that such policy would not do him
claimed money from him as q contribution to a
fund which Brady said was employed to influence
to pass the desisncy IL
time that Brady stole the fund himself
The witness gave an amusing description Of his
dttcIupI W Sct OTUcF
to get his deposition as to Walsh's claim against
Brady. The witness next came to the fact that q
report OF his testimony in the Spoiord Kellogg case
de found the place containing his testimony In the
election case marked. Witness read from that tes.
timony, In which he testified that he had no Of
fetal or financial relations with Kellogg in New Or
leans Bliss admitted that Walsh, on that occasion,
testified only as 70 matters that occurred In New
Orleans
Mr.. Walsh read from Bliss testimony, wherein he
pretended not to know how the report OF the cleo
ton case got before the jury, and called attention
to Foreman HutchtnsOn's testimony that &C his ne
quest, Bliss made out q reQuistion for the book.
The witness said that Bliss told him early In the
latters connection with the star route cases that
C0RKHILL WAS 10 b REMOVED
because the prosecution could not trust him. The
witness swore that Bliss had admitted the Justice
OF his {Walsh's) claim for q months extra pay,
though Bliss testified before the committee that II
was not Just claim. Mr.. Walsh insisted that it
WaSnOt Bliss intention 20 convict; that Bliss delib-
erately selected the weakest case and schemed 70
prevent conviction. Witness had no doubt that
BLISS WAS IN SYMPATHY WITH TIE DEFINHI
In the star route trials from the beginning. The
witness protested against BLISS testimony; that he
(Walsh) was finally served with asubp1na through
the assistance OF lady who went out sleigh riding
with the deputy marshal Walsh said no lady
friend OF his would 60 out riding with "process
server" The witness went On 70 point out what be
claimed were discrepancies and inconsistencies In
Bliss testimony before the commffsee
Tn tina honsa n cnFnynons lasf ni0ft Nar Nlchae