The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1884-06-05
InH rnrnfs.


~ w NNMMA
u Lewis sis. Nuktn VI ,hs alsie
tm Hfosn oluay/ ~ Ton ~ int,
cord Ou ilis apHssl hff urht bsi0fe ne ron.
taius no b lis ~ tsespu1n, - the soit1l 81
he oinft iH OysHulinf d%Gfendant's motion
iOf clntiHusrCs, nor n lie Tulitf ~ GA W.,
admission, of ftelutiln Of evidences .nh
'te syidrnts hsing aIuplY tutialeut ~ SUI
sort TIE ysfdiot and judgment and tue
he charge Of the eourt tut aud correct
aud 90 fundamental error hsing apparent
VI FtenTd, the Judgment Is affirmed,
Pau Va the state; if0m Falls County
TniH appellant was o0s yiotsd 0i the bur
slsry of Bucks smoke h0uss, Tor which lhe
Jury assessed the punishment OF hYs ysirs'
imprisonment Ia the p~sniientiaIy, Hsli /;
We see no error In the charge Ut The court
rxesptfd r.. The evidence, W. think, y.
anply sufficient n support the verdict snd
iude nj, and the question Of the defend
ants purchase OF the oAenn was airiy snb
mili.d TO the jnrv, who iounn rgAins' him.
There 10 no error, and the Judgment IL
RanE.n vs.. the State; from Kendall ooun'
ty, This appellant IL before THIS court mp,
pealing from u conviction Tor the theil OF
shfep, and upon q careful inspeetioh OF ,hs
records, the courts holds that the volnn'
Iary statement of defendant was properly
ad.ni ted In evidence; that the charge oi
the court is not erroneous la sny material
particular OF which appellant cen com
lain; that The evidence IL ami " sniheiant
70 support tho verdict and that the lndg'
ment should be and Is atifme'.
smith vs.. the State; IRON HUI county
App. liaLt was copvict"d OF the murder OF
W. b Gresham. Ia Aquila, Hill county,
and MS palisb ment affixed at 20 years La.
nrsoument Ia tns penitentlary. q
o,nIt's charge Ia iull ard correct; the eve
dpncs amIls TO support he verdict, ana
besides no exceptions were taken 10 TIE
Indictment, charge OF the court, or 10 the
ADM sion, or exclusion OF evinepce ano
there appearing no fundamental error, the
Judgment IL affirmed.
C.rrington We. Elllfon; from Robertson
clunty This motion to dismlss IL based
upon the fact that the appeal bond mis-
describes The judgment. Ia that. his', IL
r ,cites a judgment against y. and her hn..
uand, when the judgment was rendered
against U. es prii cipal. and q. and NJ. ~
~sursiies on the claim bond. Second, IL
describes a Judgment for $50 and cosis,
when the judgment was for 500 aud 70, be-
ing 10 per cent. damages aud al costs;
Hello, the motion is well taken. Appeal
dismissed.
Workman VS.. the State; from Bosque
connty. This appellant appeals from a cot.
yiction for swearing In q public assembly,
the tame being at u picnic, he being fintd
S25 therefor. The Information upon which
the conviction 10 based complies with the
n quirement' OF the law. The charge oil The
court Is toll, lair and correct. and the ev'-
depce being amply sufficient 10 support the
JUDGMENT, the same Is affirmed.
Oscar VS.. the state; from Robertson
county. This Ia an appeal from q conyic.
ton Tor playing CARD, for which a fine OF
$40 vas ASSESSED. The indictment is SUI.
tciant, the charge OF the court Is full and
cor.ec. and the evidence amply sufficient
10 support the Judgment. The record
shows That the county court very properly
acquired jurisdiction OF the Case. Al
iirmed.
Ley endecker vs.. the State; from Bell
county. Conviction for uDlawfully carry
ing y pistol. The question as TO whether
or NOT the defendant was travelling" was
properly submitted to the jury, VIM found
against the defendant. The term o. the
county courr held on the first Monday in
September, 1888. was legal and proper; the
amendment TO the constitution, charging
the terms Of that court not having token
effect until the 23d Of that month. Al
tirmed.
Moore vs.. the State; from Milan county.
Conviction tor the theft OF q COW belonging
to Dan Rowland. TIE case was not ole OF
O rCumstantisl evidence alone, ano, there
fore, there was no error IN the charge ~
the court. An uprecorded brsnd 10 evil
dence OF identity but not Of ownership.
The newly discovered evidence eought BY
The motion for continuance would not prob
ably change the result, as the same was
merely cumulative. Affirmed.
Broadnax We. the State; from Frio coun-
ty. Appellant prosecutes this appeal from
u conviction tor the theft Of q horse be.
longing 10 one Crabch, his punishment be-
ing assessed at ten wears imprisonment in
the penitentiary. the application for con.
t'nusnoe was properly, overruled, as The
same did not show due diligence. The
charge Of the court is full and correct, the
indictment good, and the evidence amply
sufficient to supper; the judgment, which
is affirmed.
Hubbard va. the State: from Bell county.
Appellant WIGS convicted Tor an aggravated
sssuult and battery on oor Tyler. Tue in.
d,ctment il coed snd sufficient. There is
error in the charge o. the court, nor .wss
any exception taken thereto. The excap.
lions taken to the evidence srs not avail.
abb, the evidence showing q ~premeditated
and aggravated ass ult by two men on an
man. Affirmed,
Zo.licoffer VS.. the State; from Hill county.
by Wilson, ]. This conviction Is
b ised upoD the te' tlmoDy OF one Green.
whose evidence unq~uest'onably shows him
to he MI accomplish. He, with others, was
Indicted jointly for the same offence and
ment. Such being the case, there being no
zorro borating testimony duplicating de-
with the offence committed the
Judgment is without sufficient evil
dence to support it and the Judgment is
and the cause remanded.
The Egyptian Slave TRADE.