New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-02-24
THE CLAIM AGAINsTTHE WALLER ESTATE.
WHAT 1HE PAPERS IN THE CREAMER-HUTCHINs
APPLICATION STATE.

WHAT 1HE PAPERS IN THE CREAMER-HUTCHINs
APPLICATION STATE.
The proceedings begun by Thomas J. Crea-
mer 10 whom Mrs Robert c. Hutchins has assigned
claim against the estate Of the late John r. Waller
against Mrs Mary n Waller the eXecuriI have excited
much interest ia mining circles. where Mr.. Waller
been been well known. They in the shape CT an
application 10 revoke Walters letters administration
or compel give bond rhe IS before SURF
Rollins who decided 10 send the case a referee
additional testimony necessary TO enable him TO arrive
At a decision.
Mr. Dreamer in his petition declares that he Is creditor
OF the Waller in the sum OF S25O0OO and upwards
Mrs Hutchns having gned the claiIS to him on
cember 3 last. She claims 70 have loaned Mr.. Waller
moneys from January l. 1873, 70 April 15 s93, 70 the
amount Of S6o OOO and 10 have furnished him further
cash 1879 to the amount Of $4,000 and fftyfour geld
bond, Of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway valued
al $4,000 the purpose OK business operations for
their joint account. Mrs. Hutchlns was
to receive tvo-thrIs Of the capital aud
profits ON investments. Mr.. Waller retaining the
remainder. Part OF this money invested in the TOR
rance Mining Company and the Torrance Milling aud
Smelling Company, whose properties are near socorIo,
Ney-MexicO The profits arising from these investments
are said TO be several hundreds OF thousands Of dollars
II s also alleged that the executx has mi,managed the
estate and j. unfit s due execuJi0n that her cIrc
stances dc not afford adequate security 10 creditors and
that she purposes removing her residence from this state
II Is further aveued that Mrs.. waller has, in col
mslon with the trustees OF the mining companies,
agreed 10 sell the property fer 100000 less
IL value Mrs. Wauers property sai 10 consist
solely OF "A house and lot in NewNOrk mcrtguged for
$4,000. Tue petition charges thar the eXCcJJrX had
admitted the Justice OF Mrs Huohingss claim, knowing
the re ATOMS between the latter and Mr.. waller and
their business dealings Finally 10 Is averred that for
nearly aud quarter sr prior To the Death Of tie
testatnr the execufrX had means to discharge her
ordinary household expenses and thai to meet such
ueuses Mrs Hutcuing- oaDed the restaOr sufficient FOR
that purpose and pay his family expenses advancing
for tlat purpose ZOO montG for several months"
Ia Mra. Waller denies ea"n ana every one OF
the Allegations She says that the assignment 81 Mr..
Hutchngs's claim TO Mr.. Dreamer was Intended as
fraud court; that loans OF money made 20
the testatOr any business agreement concluded that
Mr. HUiching did not pay her household expenses and
that Mr. Hutchngs IL creditor or the estate MrB.
Waller declares that she Is worth over 100000 in ner
own right which il than the value OF the "
the estate, and she characterized tne statements
about her proposed removal from the State "a
wilul corrupt and intentional flsehCod" She
admits know ledge OF the relations between the testatOr
and Mrs Hutchngs and their business dealings but de-
MES that she admitted the Justice OF Mrs Hujchingss
claim part of tire estate. she AYERS that the price
was receive for the missing property was the full
amount OF the value.