Clarksville weekly chronicle. (Clarksville, Tenn.) 1873-1890, 1884-05-03
Chancery Court Proceedings.


Following Is a list of the causes dis
posed of in the Chancery Cuurt,
Jnage Seay presiding, last week:
Waller vs. Waggener; former or
der Of sale revived
Mckenzie VS.. Quarles, executor !;
bill dismissed at cost of defendent.
Grinstead VS.. Ogburn; former or
der for an account revived.
Mar VS.. Toller; order for publica-
tion as to Geo. Mari.
County vs.. Water Co.; conp't
given till June rules to answer cross
bill.
Quarles VS.. Trice bill dismissed at
cost of eompl't.
Little VS.. Mimms; Julien Gracey
appointed guardian ad Item.
Warfield VS.. Meriwether; former
order of sale revived.
johnson vs.. Hampton report OF
Sale to McMurry confirmed.
Beaumont VS.. Beaumont; decree
of title to S. f. Beaumont
McMurry VS.. Willoughby report
of sale to McMurry confirmed.
Allen vs.. Wilson; A. III. Munford
appointed guardian al. Item.
/. Radford VS.. Rogers; report of G.
& M. as to Bailey's purchase and upon
taxes confirmed.
Talley VS.. Herring; order of sale.
Herring VS.. Talley; compromise
decree.
Sampson VS.. Kincannon iefen.
dants given till June rules to answer.
Merritt VS.. Darden; defendants
given till June rules to answer.
Quarles VS.. Harris; bill dismissed
at cost of complainant.
Williams VS.. Williams; order to
pay attorney fees.
Adams VS.. Tilley ;.defendantsg given
till June rules TO answer.
Gossett vs.. Gossett; appearance OF
Henry Wall entered by attorney and
issuance of process waived.
G. and r. Turnpike Co. VS.. Dolan ;
former order for an account revived.
Dority, Wood < Co. W.. T. P. Ed
lin s; former order OF safe revived.
Pat Sullivan vs.. Mary Sullivan
Leech IL Savage appointed guardians
Stacker vs.. Wilcox paid guardian
ad litem fee.
Merritt VS.. Bell; hill dismissed at
cost of defendant
Sullivan VI Nike Sullivan /; G. M.
Bell appointed guardian ad liteh.
Johnson VS.. Rogers; land pur-
chased bp Charm Allen ordered sold
to enforce lien for purchase money.
Caldwell VS.. Dixon report of sale
to Goodlett confirmed.
Mechanics B. and L. Ass'tn VS.
Oneal; report of commissioners on
homestead confirmed.
Stacker VS. Wilcox; report of sale
to j. E. Wilcox confirmed.
Sullivan VS.. S. Sullivan report of
renting confirmed. g.
Williams vs Williams; report of
SAL Ia Frech confirmed.
Mlrtiu, Logan and Gum vs. Neb-
let, Executor; final decree in favor OF
complainants and appealed from by
de-; udant to Supreme Court.
b iley vs. Newman; compromise
decree. t#.#
Lewis VS. Toombs; decree vesting
title i'm purchasers.
Stacker vs.. Wilcox order of refer
ence to @. and M. on taxes.
nume VS. Hume order to pay city
taxes.
Sullivan VS.. NJ. Sullivan; order to
pay city taxes.
Russell VS. Lewis; bill dismissed at
c"st,of complainant.
Jackson VS. Rawlings; decree for
sale.
GAINESVILLE National Bank VS. Lind
ley decree for sale.
Sullivan VS. S. Sullivan order to
pay city taxes.
Lockert q BrOckman former order
for an account revived. sff
Lewis VS. Toombs; sale to w. g.
Russell set aside. I..
Davis VS. Oliver Davis; decree for
sale.
Brandon VS. McNichols; decree for
sale.
Mechanics 3. and l.. Association
vs. Oneal report of sale confirmed.
Browder VS. Edwards decree for
aale.
Dycus VS. Young; decree pro con-
fesso VS. defendant.
Hatcher VS.. Allen; order for ac-
count recommitted.
Pettus VS.. Dycus; decree pro con-
fesso VS.. Fletcher and wife.
Wooden VS.. Wooden: decree pro
confesso VS.. defendent and prayer
for divorce granted.
Hatcher VS.. Allen; executor; de-
70 II A We N
Allen executor restrained from vast
ing or selling timber from the place.
Merit d Fort VS. Hannums x Co.
order of reference to G. d M.
Bailey col. VS. Bailey col bill for di-
vorce dismissed at complainants cost.
Bowman VS. OvertOn; decree of
title to Elvira Browman.
House VS. McQuade; decree for
sale.
Noyes VS. Noyes decree of divorce
entered.
Stewart VS. Greenfield order of
reference to @. q M. on taxes.
Mechanics B. and l.. Association
VS. Oneal ; decree allowing purchasers
to pay notes before due.
Pettus VS.. Allen application for re-
ceiver disallowed.
Snadon VS.. Irwin; Jas. M. Bow
ing made party complainant. De-
PENDANTS given to June rules to
answer.
Tramwell VS.. Tramwell; bid adj
vanced and resale ordered.
Laird VS. Wilson; final decree in
'avor of defendant, appealed. |
Sullivan VS.. M. Sullivan claim of
Pearce & Lawrence admitted and |