National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1884-01-24

THE COURT RECORD.
Business Transacted by tho District Ju-
dietary Yesterday.

UNITED buPkfME tOlhl'
In the supreme court of the United states yes
to-day, on motion of ID. T. Littler, Clark f. Carr,
OF GalesbuTg, Ill. was admitted 70 practice ON
motion Of r. A. Harrison John W. Heron Of Gin
Ohio were admitted to practice. On motion Of
q. a. Breaux, II. Pilans, of Mobile, Ala, was ad-
No. i2io. james X. Kennedy, claimant &C., ap-
pellant VS.. The United States. Appeal from tue
circuit court of the United States for the district
of California. On motion of Ms Solicitor GEN
erai Phillips for tho appellee, docketed and dis
missed
No ilii The city of East ST. Louis OF al, plain.
til in error, vs.. the United States ex rel. John L.
zebley. Submitted, under twentieth rule by
special Lease by Mr., J.. NJ FreSs and Mr.. = u.
Mather for defendant in error.
-, No. 1907 Joseph Hurtado plaintiff in error, vs.
the people Of the state Of California Argument
continued by Mr. a. l., Hart for the plaintiff in
error, and by Mr.. John T. Carey for the defendant
in error, and concluded by Mr.. A. Il. Hart for the
No i5 Original Ex partc In the matter of Jas
per Marlborough et al, petitioners. Argument
commenced by Mr.. II. 1ompkins for the petitioner.
Adjourned until to-day.
Court in Genera, Term-Chie Justice Cartier. Jus.
tees Hdoner and Cor.-AIackall VS., Richards argued
and submit tied,
EQUITY Court--y,tdgc ,Jdmes.--on account of the
indisposition of Judge James no court was held.
NEW SUITS.
SSe2. Margaret Ogden VS.. Margaret L. Ogden; for
divorce Huntun and Chandler solicitors.
250i2. Frank p. Blair VS.. John Guethler; appeal.
]. Williamson and q. Darlington, attorneys for de-
fendant.
COURT CALL.
Court in General TerM-Chief Justice Ca ritter, Jus.
tees HdgRcr and Cor--Nos. G..
Eqnig Court-Judge Jdnes-ASsignmen I'M
changed.
ALABAMA CLAIMS.
In the court of commissioners OF Alabama
claims yesterday case No. els. James +. Britt
ct al. VS.. The United States was argued and sub
mitted. Judgments were announced as follows,
and the court adjourned to Monday, Jan. 2S: No.
TihN nn TrntsN IttlN
%, 1868; 1904, John W. Jones, 1854, with interest
from Sept. 4, 1866 1906, Reuben Kent, 1903, with
Int interest from Oct 20 1851 1872 jeremiah C. York
mnisIrator estate of Robl. NJ York, deceased, $780,
with interest from April IL, 1864: l422 f. H. Kenset
surviving partner Of Thomas Kenset 4 Co. SAIL
with interest from Dec. 20, 1864 No $780, Geo. II.
Richardson, administrator of the estate OF Charles
Richardson, deceased, ~ with interest from
of the firm of Calvin Edwards d Co., sSl, with in
| terest from May %, 1864 No. 2l65, Mary II. Waite.
administrative Of the estate of Edward Waite,
deceased, aud Nathan Cleaves, administrator
of the estate of Bobert NJ. York, deceased,
45, with interest from March 3, 1865. No 2l66,
Robert NJ YORK deceasaa ssio with int6ss from IN
Jan. 10. 1864; 2l71 John W. CfoytEdr s5S ,jwi in
terest from Nov. %, 1861 2i7tg Samuel a Pierce
est from Dec 8, 1862; 21f5, Nathaniel o. Crane
s0i5, with interest from April 3, 1863 2l77
York, ISL, with Interest from Aug. l5 1851; 25S2
Harrison J, Libby and James Brockett llguidat-
ing partners firm OF H. J. Libby & Co., S22l, with
interest from March 16 1854; 1858, william Ferris
$50, with interest from May 0, 1888; GIT, Adolpli
Stoecker $40. with interest from Nov, II, 1854
Nov. II, 1868; 1854, Francis l.. Eingwood, sl,Sl5
with interest from Aug. 6, 1861 1885, Samuel Sic
vens, John Atkinson, and II. w Peabody, ofthe firm
| OF Samuel Stevens d Co., Sl2,IiO, with interest
| from July s, 1861 As to the beneiicaries named
| in this case, they have had the full consideration
| ofthe court and the conclusion has been reached
that the evidence already submitted does not sus
| tain their claims