St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1884-10-08
ST. PAUL NEWS.
SUPREME COURT,
An Unusually Heavy Calendar
for the Term.
Assignment of Causes-Cases Acted
Upon.
Examining Committee for Admission to the
Bar.

cdIHe III dI uOOu NeslCIUol IL 'A-N -'- ~
representatives, a large attendance OF the
legal talent of the state being present, and
Chief Justice James Gilfllan presiding, with
Associate Justices Berry, Mitchell, Dicker-
son, Vanderburg and Clerk Samuel 81. Mich
OILS, present. The assignment OF the l73
cases on the calendar and other business
occupied the court for fully three hours.
ASSIGNMENT OF CASES.
Nathan Myrick, appellant, VS.. JudsQn L..
ioure and L. E. BROKER, implicated with Daniel
F. Brawley, ct al, respondents; continued.
Daniel B. Vermilye, respondent, VS.. Mary c.
Vermilye, appellant; October p.
c. e. Keller & Co., appellants, Michael Hou1-
han, respondent; Nov. 10.
Nelson f. Griswold, respondent, vs.. James Z.
Edison, appellant; October 30
j. a. jacobson and j. c. Peterson, former
co-partners as jacobson 81 Peterson, respondents,
VS.. j. W. Williams, appellant; passed.
Franklin county bank, respondent VS.. S. b.
Elder and William Parr Is. Il. Elder), appellant;
October 16.
The State of Minnesota, plaintiff, vs. Patrick
Williams, defendant; December 10.
The State of Minnesota, plaintiff, vs.. John
Sweeney, defendant; November %.
The State of Minnesota, ex rel F. W. Luley,
relator, VS.. Orlando Simons, respondent; Octo-
Der 81.
D. j. McNerney, plaintiff, VS.. Eugene Haynes,
defendant and the Chicago, milwaukee 81 St.
Paul Railway company, garnishees; October 10.
The tate of Minnesota, ex rel, Maria L. Bron-
son, vs. Henry Moll, sheriff Of Nicollet county;
October s.
State of Minnesota respondent, VS.. William
johnson, indicted as William Smith, appellant:
November 20.
in the matter of the application for license TO
sell the real estate of Mary J. Alderman, late Of
tugns Il county, Virginia, deceased; passed.
The tate Of Minnesota ex rel Robert p. Lewis,
reator rs. the District Court of Ramsey county,
re pon ient; October21.
alvin Townsend, appellant, VS.. Peter Fenton,
respondent; October %.
j he State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. Eman-
mel cen, appellant; November &c.
G. Aultman IL Co., q corporation, appellant
vs.. Charles Kennedy, respondent; passed.
The Minneapolis g. Northwestern Railroad
compIny. appellant, VS.. G. P Woodwork, res
pond mt; November 10.
c. p. Carlson, respondent, VS.. Hiram Small,
appellant; passed.
Frederick Williams and August Scheffer, re-
spon Tents, VS.. the Central Land company, ap-
pellall; October "a.
Christine Retan, respondent, VS.. Eliza Goebel,
appellant; passed.
Daniel ID. Merrill, respondent, VS.. Samuel
Dearing, appellant; October 90.
The Security Bank of Minnesota, appellant,vs.
5. n. Bell, respondent; November IL.
n. A. Carlson, respondent, VS.. Hiram Small,
appellant; passed.
Frank A. Berry, appellant, VS.. Philip o. Con-
nor respondent; submitted on briefs.
Elizabeth D. Smith, Carrie L. Fitch and Ella
b. Dixon, respondents, VS.. Malcolm Anderson,
appellant; December 10.
Anton Shelter, administrator, ETC., respond
ent, VS.. the Minneapolis d st. Louis Railway
company, appellant; October 80,
Elias Bedal, appellant, VS.. Cyrus B. Spur, re-
spondent; January 5.
Rai
Fire and Marine Insurance company, appellant
October g.
Peter Bott, respondent, VS.. Frank II. Pratt
and Fred 5. Pratt, partners as 4. II. Pratt g. Son,
appellants; October g.
L. q. Salisbury, w. T. Rolf and W. p. Wash-
burn, partners as Salisbury, Rolf 81 Co., respond
ents, vs., The HeclIla Fire Insurance company of
Madison Wis, appellant; October 49,
Herman CUM, appellant vs.. Daniel Heffner,
respondent; passed,
The Mccormick Harvesting Machine company.
appellant, VS.. j. M. Chesrown, respondent; No
yember IL.
d. d. G.. Duncan. respondent, VS.. Joseph
Menurd, Amelia Menard, his wife, and William
IL. lngersoll ct al, appellants; October IS.
Inc IoVn OF Montgomery, appellant, VS.. the
Board OF County Commissions of the county of
lie SuFur, respondent, November 1S.
NJ. Guthrie, respondent, VS.. George Olson, APP
pc liant; passed
Matilda Roberts, as administrators of Y. W.
Roberts, deceased, appellant, w. the Chicago,
st. Paul, Minneapolis IL Omaha Railway com
pany, respondent December 10.
Nathan Herrick, appellant, Mary Ammer-
man. respondent; November 5.
Edward Jordan, respondent vs.. James W.
Humphrey, appellant; October 30.
Daniel h. Moves, Charles p. Noyes ct al APP
pelants, VS.. Bruno Beaupre, Frank Keogh ct al,
respondents; November H.
William Deering, appellant vs. Peter John
Jon, respondent; December II.
Eva Clapp formerly Morse) administrators of
.he estate of Henry l.. Morse deceased. appel
liant, vs.. the Minneapolis & st. Louis Railway
company, respondent; DEFENDERS.
John A. Brakken, respondent, vs. the Mime
Rpois q st. Louis Railway company, appellant ;
October 10.
Thomas l.. Fishback and Frank II. Allen, as
administrators OF the estate Of John NJ Cole,
deceased, respondents, VS.. G. W. Van Dusen &
Co ct al, appellants December 49,
p. p. Mast IL Co :, appellants, VS. j. C. Easton.
respondent; December II.
William + Davidson, appellant vs.. the St.
Paul. Minneapolis Il Manitoba Railway COMPANY
respondent; December IL
John Erickson, appellant VS. Christopher
Roehm and Adam Stein, respondent; Decem
Der IL.
Eli II. Sibley, respondent vs. Northern Pacific
Railroad company, appellant; November II.
orville s. Corey, respondent VS.. Northern
Pacific Railroad company, appe liant; Nov. IA
Cushman Il. Davis, respondent VS. Charles p
Chouteau and Julia Maflitt appellants; Nov. II
Ellen T. Cooibaugh, respondent, VS. Eliza j
Roemer, appellant; Oct. IA
Martin Minister, respondent,vs. A. B. Holbert
appellant passed.
Daniel b. Nermilye, respondent VS. Mary C
Vermilye, appellant; Oct 81.
Ii. o. Hamlin and z. E. Brown, partners as
hamin q Brown, appellants, VS.. John Schultz
respondent; Nov. g.
John II Randall ne
of Elizabeth G. Randall respondent, VS.. William
Constans, appellant; November IS.
Margaret |. Wsdron., respondent VS.. The CITY
Of st. Paul, appellant, November "a.
{. W. Shatto, appe liant, VS.. +. Z. Latham, re
epondent; December 49,
Maria Hefty, adm inistratrfx NJ the estate -
Nicholas Hefty, dece ased, VS.. Patrick Fox. Dnyi,
Bronson, ct al, appe llants; Oct. g.
The Waseea Comfy Bank appellant va G
Mokeuna as county treasurer of Waseca conn ty
respondent; Nov. Z.
In the matter Of the last viii and testament I,
John s Brown, deceased, George ", Brown
appellant VS.. Emily Brown, respondent: OCT 3
H. :. Branham, appellant,vs James Bezanson.
respondent; December Is.
Charles d. Boom, respondent vs. the 81 Pan
Foundry Manufacturing Co., appellant; Decem
Der 10.
Davis, appellant; passed.
X. T. Russell, respondent VS. the 81. Paul
Minneapolis & Manitoba railway comnsnv an
pellant; October Il.
Hamilton Beatty, respond VS.. the Bosrd G
county commissioners OF ssibley county, appeI
liant; October 20,
A G. Anderson, appellant VS.. Hans Knudsor
Anna knudson and NJ. Howard. respondents
December Is.
The city OF st. Paul respondent, VS.. J. W
Stultz, appellant; Dec Q.
John W. Corbeit, appellant, vs.. Julia A. Wood
Sylvester kipp orrin kipp, Alexander Ramsey
Nehemiah r Clark, eft al, respondents; oct. Is
respondent; Nov.1O,