The semi-weekly miner. [volume] (Butte, Mont.) 1882-1886, 1884-09-17
836. J A Langstaff vs. Frank Z

S36. J A Langstaff vs. Frank !
Miles.
SATURDAY, Sept. q.
9S7. Summit Valley Railway com
pany W. Silver Bow Mining ant
Milling company.
9S8. Summit Valley Railway com
pany vs. o c Middleswert.
MONDAY, Sept. %.
940. Montana Railway company VS.
Chas S Warren ct al
TUESDAY. Sept. 30.
40. Jas Patten ct al VI. Chas N
Buck ct al.
$50. London Bank of Utah vs. Jos
B Meader.
94s. ] Mckinley ct al vs. Shelley
futile.
WEDNESDAY, Oct. l.
$40. Jas A Talbot ct al vs. Si1As F
King ct al.
THURSDAY, Oct. 2.
500. Montana Railway company We.
Dennis Farrell ct al.
AFTERNOON.
5O8.-John Noyes ct al vs.. George
S Kawis; case taken under advise
ment.
627-William level vs. John G
Carroll ct al, debt; taken under adj
visement.
67l-Samuel s Welton vs. Vulcan
Mining Company, demurrer; with
drawn and five days to file replica
ton.
ia Silas F King vs. James A Muir
ray; same entry.
721-Silas F King vs. Lewis Cooper
ct al; heard on motion to strike
answer from file and taken under ad-
visement.
8O7-Erastris A Nichols vs. J G G
Thornton; heard on demurrer and
taken under advisement.
818-John Noyes ct al vs.. Charles
G Thornton; heard on motion to
strike out and taken under advise
ment.
84l-George s Lewis respondent,
vs.. Samuel X Long appellant con-
tinued until Saturday Sept. 9th, 1884
at Q a. m.
854- Charles A Nuss vs.. Frank
Hammond plaintiff. granted leave to
withdraw his motion to amended
answer and file his replication forth
with.
S96-Joseph Perron vs.: John Long
maid ct al, submitted to the court
upon the demurrer of the defendant
and taken under advisement.
1857. A A Mcmillan vs. Edward
King. Submitted and taken under
advisement.
The grand jury then came in, who,
upon roll call, were found to be all
present and the following indict-
mentS were presented to the court by
the foreman of the grand jury in
their presence, to-wit:
Territory of Montany VS.. Charles
Girton; indictment for grand larceny;
designated rs cause Nc. 1929.
Territory of Montana VS.. Henry
Johnson; indictment for grand lar
cenv; designated as cause No. 1880.
Both of which said indictments
were filed in the presence of the
s97. Patrick Clark vs.. James r
heard on motion to correct
and decree and court sus-
motion.
1929. Territory of Montana VS..
Charles Girton; Indictment for grand
larceny; Indictment waived and
granted until Sept. H., 5 p. ~, to
antwer.
1880. Territory of Montana VS..
Henry johnson; Indictment for
grand larceny; Indictment waived
and granted until Sept. II, 5 p. NJ,
to answer.
Oil. Lew w Foster ct al vs.. Jere
submitted and taken under
advisement.
939. Summit Valley Railway conn.,
.any vs. James A Murray; case
stricken from the calendar.
952. John COrcOran VS. Matt Sulll-
submitted and taken under
advisement.
959. George G Randolph ct al vs.
Rice; demurrer withdra IN
and defendant granted ten days to
answer.
GIL. Silver Bow Mining and Mill
ing company vs. Summit Valley Rail
way company; demurrer withdrawn
and defendant allowed until Septem-
Der q 8 q IN to answer.
972. James A Murray vs. Summit
Railway company; demurrer
and defendant allowed
until September % 9 q m to answer.
987. William Hirman ct al vs. Jno
+ Grayson e al; demurrer submitted
and taken under advisemeDt.
983. Alonzo G Young vs. George w
cause submitted and taken
advisement.
900. James A Talbot ct al VS. Par
rott S & G company; submitted and
taken under advisement.
99S. Laura Landoy VS. Marcelle
Landoy; submitted and taken under
advisement.
999. James A Murray ct al vs. Mon
lana Copper company; submitted
and taken under advisement.
1907. Adam FaIaday vs. Laura E
submitted and taken I'M
der advisement.
91o. territory of Montana vs Peter
Nadeau and Napoleon Paucette; con-
for term as to Peter Nadeau.