The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1884-05-13
CIRCUIT COURT.
Entries Made and Motions Filed
In a Number Of Gases
Yesterday.

ton.
Bethemea Summers VS.. John 81. Sum-
mers, divorce; defendant files answer.
State ex rel. NJ r. Priest VS.. Michael
Welsh, suit for taxes; defendant files
answer
Campbell & Cutler vs.. May II. Stewart
ct al, suit on account; defendant files
answer.
J. A. Gage ct al. vs.. Siegel & Lewis, at.
tachment; defendant Lewis files separate
answer, r. c. Sneed, interpleader.
John Galligan VS.. John w. Menifee,
suit on note judgment by consent of plain
tiff for $50. and costs VS.. plaintiff, and by
consent judgment entered satisfied.
B. Levy VS.. s. n. Lewis, salt on note
continued by consent.
Wells w. Taylor VS.. J. Frank Tomlln,
trespass defendant files plea in abatement.
Joseph Higgins vs.. Jos L. Cartwright,
suit on note plaintiffs demurrer to answer
sustained and defendant desiring further to
plead; judgment is rendered for plaintiff
for 5 1880 with ten per cent. interest.
w. d. Ilgenfritz VS.. Pettis County bank
appeal; continued By consent.
Dona CeJarnett VS.. Arthur 5. Lantz, at
tachment; judgment by default and final
for plaintiff for $444 10.
4 w Vs. LdutZ,
attachment judgment by default and final
for plaintiff for S646.65.
Robert McClung VS. Dona Del arnett, in
terpleader in the case OF Dona Del arnett
VS.. Arthur S. Lantz; motion for new trial
overruled by consent.
Same VS.. William II. Finley same en-
try.
State ex rel Brown VS.. Martha J. Kemp
ct al, suit for taxes continued by consent.
Same VS.. Richard Ritter; continued at
defendants costs.
Same VS.. Martha E. Smith, ct al; same
entry.
State ex rel, Moses VS.. Samuel Shanks,
suit for taxes; motion for new trial over
ruled.
George Thomas VS.. S., w. & S. Ry. Co:
suit for damages; dismissed at defendants
cost.
Curtis Field VS.. Elizabeth Moberly. suit
on account; defendant files answer.
Sarah E. Porter VS.. II. II. Marean, suit
for dover; defendant files answer.
Ira Hinsdale VS.. F. A Sampson eft al,
suit in equity; demurrer taken up, heard
and oyerruled.
Sarah E. Bradley ct al, VS.. Missouri Pa.
cihc Railway company, suit in ejectment
by request ordered that the name OF j. j;
Cockrell as attorney be stricken from the.
record in this case.
The same entry was made in all OF the
Bradley ejectment cases now on docket,
fourteen in number.
John d. heterogeneous vs. Missouri Pa
ciic Railway company, garnishee Of John
Turner; plaintiff files interrogatories to
garnishee.
w. s. Horr VS. Missouri Pacific Railway
company, garnishee of George Beene alias
LA. Grow plaintiff files interrogatories to
garnishee.
r. Sneed, interpleader in the case of T..
A Gage ct al, VS. Siegel & Lewis; inter
plea filed and cause docketed.
w. E. Ford vs. Jesse Higdon, suit for
damages, motion to dismiss taken up and
heard and leave granted to file q good
bond by the 23d inst.
w. III. Gummersoll, ct al vs. Daniel B.
Talbot ct al, suit on account ordered
placed on equity docket.
Moore, Dyas & Co., vs. w. r. Thomas,
suit on account; jury waived; case taken
up and heard by the court judgment for
plaintiff for $176.18.
L. F. Robbins vs.. r. c. Sneed, suit on
account, by consent Judgment for plaintiff
lies for costs.
Pettis County bank vs. George Suedaker
It al, suit on note plaintiff files reply to
oint answer, also to separate answer of
defendant Snedaker defendants file motion
10 strike out parts of reply to Snedsker's.
separate answer motion heard and over
ruled defendant Snedaker withdrsws sep
arate answer and stands on original Joint
oaOo far Mnn1ov
Pettis County bank VS.. S. n. Lewis, suit
IN account judgment by consent for plain
.iff for 1926. so.
Same vs.. same, suit on note; judgment
,y consent for plaintiff for S208.34.
Same VS.. George Snedaker ct al, suit on
lote plaintiff files reply to Joint answer,
llso separate answer to defendant Sneda-
Ier case set for Monday.
Sarah J. Flick vs.. Rachel Thomas, gar
,ishee of James McRorey; dismissed for
want of prosecution.
Orr & Lindsey vs.. B. RI. Ingram, gar
lishee of Berry Brothers; defendant files
notion to require Sangree & Lamm to pro-
luce papers.
James II. Cole VS.. Richard Rush ct al,
eplevin dismissed By plaintiff at his cost.
A. J. Hall vs.. r. M. Fraker ct al, suit on
tote; dismissed as to defendants Fraker
md Snoddy, and judgment by default and
NAL against other defendants for $82666,
Nth ten per cent interest.
James M. Sparks vs.. Missouri Pacific
ailway company, suit for damages; de-
endant files answer.
Johanna Tevis, ct al, vs. Missouri Pa
i6c Railway company, suit for damages.
files answer.
F. c. Maynard VS. John r. Skinner, suit
n contract, by consent leave to defendant
o plead in thirty days after term.
A. J. Hall ct al, Us the Missouri Print
ng company ct al, suit in equity; by con-
emit, leave to defendants to plead on or be-
ore July LIST.
John b. Hieronymus VS. Missouri Pacific
Railway company, garnishee of Johu Tur-
er; motion to dismiss and discharge filed
y defendant; defendant, John Turner, files,
-