Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1884-01-25
ADDISON COUNTY COURT.
full Report cfthc Cases and DecisiO


Continued from tHrd page
Tho fret c,eo or,,od Tues,,ov afternoon
=, W. l,.,,1','. .....~'
was 'nc H. W. Oo1cn"ci company w. - d.
Marshall year ago last Summer Harry
A. Rowe. who was keeping a billiard and
ol ro,,. :, Nidd1o,,,,r,, ,r,,, int, i,so1-
pun '''N' - -''9
VehcY' anu MI Na'suaA was "Pp''u'eu
assignee. Among the property which came
into the possession of Mr.. Marshall as as
s;,,roo ,roro billiard table and no,I table
A. :, ',r..,,1.,
which Rowe hau OOlAihcu nom 'le OJI'cAutI
company of New York by lease, as the
nl,in,ifr claims and by \ conditional sale. as
he defendant claims The C1l,cnder com
narv rooiavirod thn tolrcs ard in The triol in
he con5ty court Mr. MARSHALL obtained a iudg.
n r1o for Snn cont and costs and an order
hat tba tah,es ha retnrncI In him to he dis.
nosoi NJ fnr the hcnrci; of fine creditors The
ppIaintir carried the cac. mo Inc case oc.
rnniad half the Afternoon. 4. p. Turner.
George f. Lawrence and I. II. Mcleod rem.
resented the plaintiff aud Charles NJ. Wilds
a IrC ' for 'tha defendant
The nryt cosc was A. Il. L4,ubcrt's adj
minis,rotor vs. Thomas A. Ncrrijrs estate.
TINS IiItis was branTbt M on m apneaI
rrim n decision of n probate illra The
annnoI was dismissed Dyo fyT5,r by the
CIrntv CONT and taken M On executions
by the plaintiff. Charles : Colblrn. Of
pitlsford rrnrpscn,cl the plUinti,Tacd Daniel
r ,lnrts tho defendant
DARWIN Rider vs. Henry /. SaelIglet al.
vas thc newt and last case argued At the
Inn, when InJre Knapn sued the Adj ,:sop
C|un,v .E5,,ru1I ATTACHING the plupt Of the
noner the defendants rcccipiedtyr tie prop
r,, t,nr, ~. nr,nortv .ohse,1antiy.
Knonn Tbn nronertv was finally sold 10
tha ip.o,si., priniinT comranv If which
InI,o 'Knonn Is member The de-
San,io,,,s WIZ h.J rcca;3tcd for the propertv
whom n,iainally attached. refused to pay the
amount If Inc Judgment against the Jo,raal
c,mptny and in favor of judge Knapp,
,,rop a;' oNrc,iti,n against them WIS placed
for collection in the lands Of Deputy Sheriff
Darwin. Rider Hence this suit At the
DNc'n,har form If the comfy court a iudg.
oLt,rni Nv fine rIaintiT Wildes
I'lcII WV, N'3 ,,,,,roi f,r Rtar md NicIcSd
ciala ani = 5ib,r,s aopcar,d for the defend
- "'''
The two following cases which have been
,in nv Inn, ,%W in curt in one stage or another,
were moi arrued. hut were left with the
M,re ''I I, INK Frne's ndmiuis,rl,1r vs..
I ,,,,or;ooo RnqrJ of Commissioners for
Hll.'t,C" H,;ssI1ns and The American b ard
- CI7lnnissIonrrs for Foreign Missions VS..
Iosonh K Ferra's administrator.
'o, ,I,,, a. Wi,n,,r,G nnnrIlaut vs.. Alfred
- Amos "l,'l.l W'i,n,r,h w Aired Prott
,,.ora Submitted to the court without argu-
Meir n',H a., tho brirfs Slte aud WIdes
s sr w iu,' va 'I Grondev for Pratt
This c,mnicted The list of cases on the
,,d in's on nd ,Se ~orIl in court was finished
nv oI b Nt' adiSnrnment Tuesday evening
"Wednesday morning the judges came into
o,nr, ', ond on1,unced their decisions 50 far as
arrived at The disposition so far made of
MI the case on The docket is as follows:
Ira Tucker ct nj. VS.. f. Lawrence ct al.
conntv court verdict for plaintiffs. Judg-
ment reversed and case reminded to county
court for new trial.
YIN. Giles executor VS., VIM Aldehs eX-