Daily Los Angeles herald., 1884-05-14
lothian Bixby and
Humphrey w. Willett, PLAINTIFF,
VS..
William M. johnson and
Felipe Alvarado. Defendants.

Action brought In the Superior Court Of the
State Of California. In and for the County Of
Los Angeles, and the complaint hled In said
County Of Los Angeles. In the office Of the Clerk
of said Superior Court. .if
ing to William NJ. johnson snd Felipe Alvsrsdo.
You Are hereby required To appear In en- action
brought against you by the above named plain
tiis In the Superior Court o. tho State Of Calior
mis-, In and for the county Of Los Angeles and to
answer the complaint fled therein, within ten
days (exclusvs OF the day Of service), after tho
service on you OF this Summons-if SER cd within
this county; or, II served elsewhere within thirty
days-or judgment by default will be taken
against you according 70 the prayer Of said com
plant.
The said action Is brought TO require you
and each Of you TO set forth the nature Of your
aud TO obtain decree Of this Court tnat plain
tin, Jotham Bixby. Is the ownes In fee Of the fol-
lowing described .premisss, IL, Al that real
property 10 the city OF 10. t.ssIes county Of
Los Angeles, state Of CaliiorifA. ,,ounded and
described as follows. C0lninsnciug At the south
west oornos Of said tract At post Of the fumes
marked - station Il one, being the northeast
corner 81 Chzvis street and Lovers Lane, n bk'
East eighty six one hundIsdths chains; thsnos
N. 24l' East four and Ul-l00 chains; thence n
H' X 62.i0o chains; thence N. 5sl' Y. nine
0O10O chains; thence N. co. H. four and l5-lOO
chains; thence South 35A' X. nine TO- 100 chains:
themes 3 ~ W. two 3rl0O chaiss thencs 8. 81
W. two 10 100 chains; thence ~ ". nine s5-l0o
chains; thence D. So W. six 9O-10O chains; thence
N. 37i' W. two G0-l0J chains: thence NJ a3Y W.
Ave e6-lO0 chains 70 point 81 beginning, accord-
Ing to survey Of Geo. HansGn, sur,c ,cyog, made
March =, A. D 1916. Tho lAUd shove described
comprising what Is low known ~ "NiIls Sub
division OF the Ssbicbi Tract" o. per map rec
ordsl In O0anty Recosder's Once Of Los Angeles
county. Excepting thsrsisom the tract Of land
previously sold to the southern pscihc Raiiroad
company md lots and In block of said sA-
And that plaintiff, Humphrey W. wilietts. l.
the owner In fee Of the foiiowin,, described prem
lsss. via: AL that real property In the city u
Los Angeles. county OF Los Angeles. State Of
California, known and described a. lots 8 and
In block 8 OF Mills su bdivison of szid sabichi
tract
And further, that II be adjudgea shd dsors>d
that you nor either Of you have any right title
or interest In sati premises or any psrt thsrsof,
and that you and each Of you be forever dehar
lsss or any part thereof adverse 10 the plaibtiAs
or either OF them, and tor costs OF suit
Rsfsrence is had 70 complaint for partlculArs.
And You ase hereby notified that II you fall 70
appsar and answer the said complaint ~ above
required, the mid plaintiffs viii cause your de-
isult 70 be eatsr:i and apply "a The cour sos
the relief demanded. 81
Given under m, hand and tho zeal Of the su-
peFior Court Of the Sta " of California In And ios
ihs county Of Los Angeles, this 6th day q Feb.
tusTy In tho year Of our Lord, one Thousand eight
hundred and eighty fosr. "e.
IScai.I A. W. POTTS,
Clerk.
BY A. RsnrAu. Deputy.
A. II. JudsoD. Attorney for Plaintias.