The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-03-30
A sOUrI TWAS JurHNAiA us
NAFHANtrp 1IiisNsi AT
kpllIn IiNAs,

Post, Nz"the iIufiuorel N,tth Itath man
Wi continue 10 get len ttorls sioilow'
"N. believe the larl IL elton settled the
a ie,t on ssto where the democratic major
t,iss we've pl,d up, aud Moth Texas had
no cause 10 blush FL the full JUS hoa'
ion Of This statement let isots attest Tn'so
sill show that North Texas Is today The
Glbfsl ar OF the d,moorsoy and us only
nope for the iu ufe. Year by
year since 1870 has the demo
era 10 M i,ny OF TN, state been decreased
until a, The lasi ,lscti II II 1ss indeed den'
oiGTsi,d ,ha, e. ihsss sections was due the
election Il G,vtKsoR IsLssD. The Cokx
m ,l1rty In is'6 wfs ~ round numbers
.lmtOO. The RoBshrs vote In ISIS
VS. i65 t0l ss against HANNAH aud
NoLroEs Of 7s0l7, showing me-
iorty for tho iuimr of 10 $40. Ia
1851 tie vote stood, ior ROb.hTs l6S,3.3
against DAVIS and HANNAH "i ~ ~ snow
inta ntjoIiiy fer tie ioimer OF 6s,sbi. In
$50 the yot, itCoo, fo' lgiL,AD l5o,SO
against JOhks ard II nELT On OF lU2 s1
sho vii . m,j5rity Tor thu ioimtr OF A. 0J5
II re has b,en a gradual and sure rduc-
a OF tie dc mt cibt c pubeirnioiill VOC at
GOO vet within AK y,sI0. Now, let us
a,a.a w., LIST vote OF the state election
fhe total voie II the state was, for las.
LAID l'O,SDt 10 JONAS md RoDtnTsos lu2-
80 or "A mi Hty fr the ioimrr ~ Il ga. A
cibsicefsn,e por ion OF ihis msj ,fiy wac
rom etuu,i,- H. Iorilwet, T.IAs, bus this
W. throw ol aud count oily the vote a.
gwen IA OF y ,he 100 Congressional dis.
trOi oourths. An ,Ntmibsuon here *
h. bite tnat Ia the h nro districts, the
tSo districts OF purely D,T Texas, such NJ
d Las. Graysyn, Colin, etc, alone OF on,
10 ciunue', IRELAND received "a ms.
rty OF a "a, or over ou'-ssl OF his en-
lir m nj Ia the whole state. The 9th,
or d l. a.. d strict oi7 oluntiss gave him
m 81 My OF ~ $50, he .srs,.t maj nifty m
tn he, OF toe II districts.
In abe Il,h oisiric', of % counties, c'm'
p,s,d OF Parser l. Psso etc. IRELAED's
m rily wat $50 Ia the 81 district, Of
II counties. com posed OF Va Z,udt, Smith,
co his msjIrity was 3 2G5. In the h
d strict, OF II o,ur ties, composed OF Fan
min, Hopkins etc, his M jri,y was 660.
In the % district, OF o cour tee, composed
OF Henderson. San Augu tine, ,tc., his ma
jlrity was l,4i3 In til. III or Galveston
district, Of 20 counties, which rave OculL
rRsaa majority OF some 2 $50 over the
de ncc-s'ic nominee, lBELAsD's majority
was but a60 TIE msj priuss in these
districts OF SO counties 10 I up "a ,0So, which
|, sm ,ller ihsn the Da las, Tsrfant and
Gfayson district mojoriti1s, only 10 cur
/ es of "a ,2i0.
Now LIT us see how the cste
stands IN oentrel, southern ard wes-
ern Texas We have Their districts, VIZ {:
the Lat, sth, OH and lob, with total OF "a
couoties aud VIZ fHd mai nifty against
iRLLAkD In every district, and in favor OF
JoEEs OF some G,o7l ,oteg. The exhibit II
as iollowf: The Isl district OF ~ counties,
composed o. Harris. etc.. shows II M jori y
over IRELAND Of 59S. Tho s h district, Of
10 coui ties composed OF Gaudslnpe, ETC.,
gives the heaviest o. all the nal 'ritics
AGAINST him, OF 2772 votes. Ths d.
triot OF 4 counties composed OF Washing
ton, atc, shows u majority Of 100 votes
| against him. The 10Th district OF "a oouu'
tiss. composed OF Bexsr, ETC., eivss Ds-
jorty Of M against him.
| IL IL iaot, therefore, that the I
counties In tbs Dallas'Tsfrsn, dissnc',
with their majorities for IRELAND OF 1900,
were larger than the msjofisies given him
py the 30 counties in the eastern
Texas district, tho Galveston county, the
Harris county, the Bexar, Gusds ups and
Washington county disirists oil pu, to-
gs,her. 1t 10 equally fact that his 'ams
Dallas a-rant district, with IL $50 demo-
cratic msj)ritv. wss more than double the
tire majority. GOA. of Jones. in the
"a southern and southwestern counties
Again, In the matter OF state c'nvsniitn
representation, we bsvs this tsms
Dallas Tarr.nt IRELAND vote OF ooun
ties. 81 05). with portion o.
1913 woes out Of the possible Total 503 the
nun Der at the coming crnvettion, bised
on the last one. II to this dntrct We ado
the other purely north. Texas districts, viz
the Atm, and II IN. 1. O., the FAnnan- Parker
40 counties, 20 800, We will have IL moe
VOICE. or loi vc,es. To this. y. be'one'r
to north Texas we may add the Is 0sl IL
the 3rd, or Van Z,nd,- Hunt district, which
increases the figure 80 more votes, all told
pa votes or more then hrlf Of the who's
for these, our 20 counties. o. the other 0'
counties, ca In south and sou Invest Texas
gave majority against IRELAND Of 6O7i
D.duotipg from this his entire mtj rifles o
2s73 votes for the rem aiming IS counties
Galveston and east Texas, We see short
sgs OF 3, pol votes.
Bu, this is not all. BY further refere nc'
we di.cover that the democratic vote II
sou h, west and southwett Texas has beer
falling oiT, whereas in oil this region th'r'
CON es Il lrg With our great increase o. pop
nation an increase OF democratic power
Surely, the caee Is now clear that to morn
re.as must the democracy lonk In thu
fut ire for democr attic victory, and must as
pirap,s TO state ffres look for their Pup
mort. Sid the Gszette not right, and bat
the HERALD not shown now be
yond all question ihst Tho las
election settled the question ns tt
vhe-e the democretlc m,jorities weri
piled mp, and north Texas had M cause tt
blush?n II the friends of that journal n
the peorl, OF its SECTION endorse the propo
si,ion OF the Houston Poet, published
where the democracy got lait." that "ih'
4 aiitiontl North Texss man will continue
TO get Isft,n the propecy can have the de
,ir-d fulillment 80 far as concern candi
dates beyond north Texas.
.pouT PUBLISHING DIsBEPUrABLi