St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1884-09-21
THE COURTS.
District Court.
SPECIAL TERM.
tBcfore Judge Brill.)


Clara Schwarz vs. C.. c. Schwarz; no re-
spouse and stricken off
In the matter for the opening of Herman
street; judgment to be entered against
property for $25.
In the matter OF the assignment of the
st. Paul Harvester works; continued
c. S. Schmidt VS.. August Lehman; con-
tnued.
Thomas Greeley VS.. the St Paul, Mime
apolis " Manitoba Railway Co.; heard and
taken under adyisement.
Caroline Hauessler VS.. John Hauessler:
continued.
Rudolph SchifTman. assignee, VS.. David
Ramaley, ct al. continued.
Nils Nosslin VS. James Carroll; continued
James NJ Granger VS.. Mayor Hall and r..
+. Marvin garnishee; case continued three
weeks for service on the defendant.
Alonzo Bryant VS.. VIM. Lee, John NJ.
Mcclure, John c. Nugent ct al. f.; to be heard
by Judge Simons.
VIM. Gels vs. John Linstad heard and
Judgment ordered for $500.
In the matter of the insolvency of Muller
" Thompson; continued.
Jane b. Shaw vs.. Alvah Midget; heard
and granted.
Eliza \: NORM VS.. VIM. Mudgett and Geo.
Jay Owens VS.. Edward Longevin; submit
TED.
Samuel D. Lord VS. c. B. Gallagher; sub
mitted.
AnGorn Easton vs.. VIM R. Merriam /;
heard and taken under advisement
Louise Hahmann VS.. John Hahmann
continued.
Samuel Judd ct al VS.. E. F. SkIdmore; to
be heard by Judge Simous.
In the matter OF the application of C..
Crowley for certain moneys paid into the
court; heard and granted.
In the matter of the assignment of Wilson
Il Monkhouse; heard and taken under adj
ysemeut.
In rc-assignment of Orsneau & Mersduc
continued.
In re-assigument of James NJ. Smith Il
CO.; continued.
Louis earle vs.. School District No. 3, etc. /;
continued.
JAS. \. Smith VS.. Berry Dripps ct al, Math-
ias Item garnishee; referred 10 J. b. Shipman
10 take disclosure.
Board of county commissioners vs. Geo.
w. Reese; order made absolute.
Emilie Ranhat vs.. Gustav Ranhat; heard
and taken under advisement
DECISIONS FILED.
(By Judge Simons.)
Laura X. Stone vs.. f. T. Skidmore; mo-
ton of plaintiff for new trial denied.
COMPLAINTS FILED,
Bisslsnd Il Brown vs.. John L. Merrill.
surviving partners of the late firm Of J. L.
Merrill y Co. action to recover Judgment
for $3.50 and interest for goods sold and
delivered.
Horatio Houlton vs.. Michael O'Br!en; ac-
ton for =, 600 damages against defendant
for injuries by blasting TO leased building
and grounds at the foot of the bluff iE DAw-
son addition to West ST. Paul. Answer fled
that the bluff fell down OF itself upon the
premises by action of the elements,
Frederick Bauholzer vs.. Robert J. Dia-
moud and Kate Knoll; action 10 declare Ger
tain premises on which q mortgage was
given to secure a promissory note of s., goo,
aud which was sftcrward sold by Diamond to
Kate Knoll and a warranty deed given, be
declared subject 10 such lien aud sold 10 sat
iSfy claim and expenses.
Wm. Giles vs.. John Linstad; action TO re
cover 500 damages for the unlawful CONVEX
sion OF personal property.
Frederick Banho,zer vs.. Robert J. Dia-
mond, Katie Knoll aud Julia A. Goforth
action that mortgage Of plaintiff on land
on university avenue to secure . note OF
81. 500 be declared 4 hen upon said premises
a. against all persons claiming interest
therein.