Morning journal and courier., 1884-03-29

Carpet company and the result that the debtosa
children employees there compelled to total
Of Winchester asked II the debtor had refused to pay
the 50. Mr.. Morrison said he did not know. Mr..
workingmen. The factorizing law is for the advan-
taae Of shyster lawyers He favored the Senate bill,
persons having large salaries who might wish to
dodge payment. Mr.. Lewis, of Waterbury, advocated
sides tbs working CLASSES as ven as their creditors
Mr.. Mclean, If simsbury, spoke to the same effect
their creditors It is the men who are working for
daily Mr.. Cook of Stamford said that fronl
working people but none for these who get trusted
for groceries, andeun of and spend their money for
whiskey, do. He believed that the factoriz-
ing law is abused, but as there was much differ
ence Of opinion to what change should be made ne
@ Mo- TO nEoed Nm bin
perfectly fair 1t would put the LEGISLATURE Of 1884
Morrison. of Enfield, said that there
lily. excepting that only $40 shall be exempt from
attachment for debts due for rent, food and Other
poneent, and again urged the Senate bill as giving
all that the working people demand Mr.. Talmsdg
of Bridgeport represented the importance Of the sub
jsct and the necessity action at this session.
He did not believe the Senate bill went far enough:
wages. He urged q series of votes on the various
propositions to test the Of the House. MT NC
the question The creditors, the storekeepers and
others need some protection Be did not believe
repealed, for they do not suffer from 1T. Mr. Rspge
suggested that there ecalawag merchants as we'll as
dishonest working people Pc thought $50 exemp-
ton would be about right. Mr.. Bowers, OF New
Milford, hored the law could be fixed SO as TO dis
criminse in favor of the honest creditor and against
the dishonest otherwise it Is best to leave the
law as it is to-day. Mr.. Coats. of Windsor Locks
claimed that resort to the factorziEg law
only last resort. Ninetynine psr cent of the
working people pay their debts promptly; the others
should be forced to pay what they owe man 9
wages we'll his other property should be held
liable for his debts. Mr. Neale. Of South1ngton,
advocated the Senate bill IS just and right. and
satisfactory to all parties 1t will do away with an
existing ~evii in manufacturing towns, the making
OF assignments -
by q rising vote.
The veto of the resolution creating commission TO
compile and revise thu probate law was taken up ana
read. Mr. Case, Of CRANKY, defended the action o.
the Legislature appointing two members OF the Houe
out of the five members of the com 1sslon. ne oe-
Tended the Legislature against any idea OF 1mpro-
prety. The commission would be only an arm OF the
petsnt gentlemen should not be selected from among
its members. Simlsr appointments have been Inade
in years past and have been sanctioned by Connec-
ticut's Governors. There are prece6ents at71
peecedens. In 1887 the Legislature appointed M1es
I. Granger, member, judge. Governor waller
was number of that Legislature, and there Is nc
record of any protest from him. In 1885, William
Minor, q member of the House, was appointed
not protest In 1870 Lafayette 8. Foster. the Speak
er, appointed judge. Mr. Case said that while
bowling executive of the State he bowed to the
will OF the people of the State whose wishes are rep
objecteo to by the Governor is a gentleman, lGoV
Fennl of Winchester, who came to us MANNED anc
SCARED from the battle field Of his country. zap
| plsusel
The resolution was passed over the Governor
veto.
at 1880 the House adjourned until Monday at 10 N