The Kimball graphic. (Kimball, Brule County, Dakota [S.D.]) 1883-1905, 1884-02-01

to make their decision. 1t was grant
ed and the same question will be dis
cussed again on next Monday eve
enlng.
We invite the attention of our
readers to the card Of DR.. L. Milliron
DENTIST of Chamberlain, which
appears in this issue. The DR.. has
been at Chamberlain for the past
ten months, has received a share of
the work pertaining to dentistry and
proved himself a competent and
reliable dentist. His work speaks for
itself. He has done work for parties
in and about Kimball, which shows
artistic as well as mechanical skill.
He talks Of paying regular visits to
this place in the near future but
wishes to become more acquainted
before ves*psing.
One of the upreme judges OF Iowa
in an address recently delivered to
young men, said: When l see q
young man who is a clerk on a mod
crate salary in a store, smoking ten
cent cigars and occasionally going to
get his drinks in a saloon, I make up
my mind that that young man is
spending all he earns. When l see
him in addition to these, riding about
town on Sunday i'll a livery rig, l am
then satisfied that same young man is
stealing from his employer; and it is
strange that young men do not know
that old business men read them
through and through and such young
men can neve secure places of trust
and responsibility.
Justice Whites office Monday was
the scene of an cnraged mother seek
ing r%etribution for grievances against
a young man who became too tamil
lar with her daughter. Owing to
some popularity of the case, it could
not come under the jurisdiction of the
justic court, and was dismissed. 1t
seems the young nan lived ncighbor
to the compliments, and spent much
of the time in company with the
young lady whose name he has dis.
graced. We understand the fellow
is soon to be married to q young lady
i'll Iowa or WIS. A man guilty of
such conduct deserves the sey,rest
punishment. The parties. hail from
Buffalo Co. who desire t. have their
names withheld and the matter l.ept
quiet.
Henry Smith, while scr'ing IN the.
Union Army, in the latter part Of
1864, lost a diary near Winchester,
Va, where his regiment was at that
time. The diary was not very val
liable, therefore he made no effort to
find it, and of course never expected
to see or hear OF it again. Last Wed.
nesday he received q letter from a
friend enclosing a clipping from some
eastern paper, which stated that a
diary belonging to Henry G. Smith
had been picked up after an engage,
ment near Winchester, and the finder
had kept it in his possession until the
present time, and Mr.. S. or his friends
could obtain it by addressing him.
Henry was very much surprised at
receiving this news and sent at once
for the WADE MEcuM of those trying
and never to be forgotten days.
1t has been rumored that petitions
to remove the U. S. Land office from
Iankton to Chamberlain were being
quietly circulated iii Brule, Charles
Mix ane Douglas counties. Regard
ing 1t the Press and Dakotaian saws:
These petitions when ciculatcd
fully, are to be returned to Chamber.
lain, and will be taken by a commit
tee from that city TO Washington to
be presented to the department. of the
interior and the removal asked. The
q%nietncss with which these petitions
have been circulated, evidences a
well concerted plan of action. The
people of Yank,on will not allow the
land Office removed from that city
without heroic opposition. The par.
ties circulating these petitions have
carefully avoided Yankton,s as well
as the town of Kimball, which is neal
Chamberlain. and the interests OF the
two towns are antagonist,c, and bitter
feeling prevails among the leading
men of each. John II. King OF
Chamberlain is a politician of indom
table energy, and a good wireworker
but he and his Chamberlain friend.
will not have a walk over in getting
the land Office removed from Yanktol
as it is ofsquite as much value to that