The Saline County journal. [volume] (Salina, Kan.) 1871-1893, 1884-06-26

the enforcement thereof; that he Is
not = fanatic on the question Of the
prOhibitOry liquor law but simply In
favor OF its enforcement while il Is q
law, that he was not asked any ques-
tons tending to disclose what his
views were that the testimony Ia
these cases showed the guilt OF the
defendant Beyond any question Of
doubt, and such testimony was not
disputed by any witness; that in the
case Of the State vs.. VIM. ii. Sweeney
he, the said Sweeney voluntarily and
in open court during the progress Of
his trial made admission Of his guilt,
that In the conduct Of said eases Judge
Prescott manifested hO prejudice and
his actions impressed ailiant AS being
entirely fair aud impartial that the
county attorney Joseph Moore and
the counsel associated with him con-
Quoted themselves calmly and with
fairness towards the defendants and
further affiant saith not.
LEANDER MAPEs.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 18th day Of June, 1884.
w. II. BISHOP,
Notary Public.
STATE OF KANSAS, I 90
SALINE COUNTY, -
Geo. w. McPhail being duly sworn
says that be was a juror at the May
term Of 1884, Of the District court Of
Saline county, State Of Kansas, and at
said term served as a juror IN the
cases Of State VS.. Gustav Behr, State
Va. Peter Mugler and State vs.. NJ. J.
Ludes, that In the impaneling Of the
juries heard no one questioned as to
his sentiments on the prOhibitOry
law, except as to the penalties and the
enforcement thereof, That he was
then and Is now not in favor OF said
law, but he was not asked any ones
lions tending to disclose what his
views were; that the testimony I'm
these cases showed the guilt OF the
defendants beyond any question or
doubt, and such testimony was not
disputed by any witness that In the
conduct Of said cases Judge Prescott
manifested no prejudice and his ac-
tiOns impressed affiant as being
entirely fair and impartial, that the
county attorney, Joseph Moore, and
the counsel associated with him con-
Quoted themselves calmly and with
firmness towards the defendants, that
In the case Of State vs.. Peter Mugler
testimony did show that the defend
ant did sell, barter and give away in
tOxicating liquors at the time and
during the progress Of his trial and
further affiant saith not.
GEO. w. MCPHAIL.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 18th day Of June, 1884.
w. II. BISHOP,
Notary Public.
STATE OF KANSAS,
COUNTY OF SALINE,
T.W. WOlcOtt being duly sworn says
that he was a Juror at the May term,
1884, Of the district court OF Saline
county, Kansas, and at said term
served in the following cases, to wit:
State vs.. Gustav BehT, State vs.. VIM,
Huebner, State vs.. Peter Mugler;
that In the impaneling Of the jury he
heard no one questioned as to his SELL
timents on the prOhibitOry law, eX-
oept as to the penalties and the ell
fOrcement thereof that he was then,
and is now, not in favor Of said law,
but he was not asked any questions
tending TO disclose what his views
were that the testimony in each Of
the cases showed the guilt of the de-
PENDANTS beyond any question OF
doubt, and such testimony was not
disputed by any person or witness
that in the conduct Of said cases Judge
Prescott manifested no prejudice or
feeling against the defendants or any
of them and his actions impressed
affiant as being entirely fair and i'm
partial that the County Attorney,
Joseph Moore. and the counsel assO-
ciated with him, conducted them
selves with calmness and fairness to-
wards the defendants that in case of
the State W.. Peter Mugler, the testi-
mOny showed that the defendant did
barter and give away intoxicating
liquors during the progress Of his tri-
al, and further afliRnt saith not.
T. w. WOLCOTT.
Subscribed and sworn TO before me,
this 18th day Of June. 1884.
w. H. Bishop,
Notary Public.
STATE OF KANSAS
COUNTY OF SALINE,
L. NJ. Shaw being duly sworn says,
that he was a juror at the May team,
1884, OF the District court Of Saline
county, Kansas, and at the said term
served as n juror In the case Of State
vs.. Jacob Mugler. That I'm the en-
panelling Of the jury heard no one
questioned as to his sentiments on the
prOhibitOry law except as to the penal
ties and the enforcement thereof that