The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1884-06-12


nsssissros sousyy surav.
J.ss Ter. tsSt
Hos, W o ynasrs. chssi gsdge
Hos NJ cssYualn. 49,. -
Hos. omrp Haal. Asst sads"
y " fns. STATS Attorney.
1enx Lomssoe. SkeFgf
Tie srssd Jsry vas aiscissssa Tssu
a., Eersins. having repcrisi three ira
bills ssd Gvs net fsasd.
The sAss Of 4l~sars ". Shoaim 10
slssSs 81 plsintsnrs ~if. The jury breush
iIsrsraiai for rlsis,ir 10 recover sTdc'
ssd cost
", r. Pwi~ "a A. n Wa. II,
plslstr .bo vss ocllss.sr 81 the town q
sssSsfissd claimed that the isssadas
vso uA ssvs treasurer did no, give hin
credit for fsry dollars which had bssu
paid him. Parker held rscsip.s fer ihs
Gums be claimed but Webb claimed thai
there vs mistake 10 the receipts asd
iAss Parker never paid him the assust Of
nossy sansd 10 The receipts. II 10 svi,
dsss tbst Csc Of them lied Asd The Jury
failed 10 sgrss and there Vas sviisstly
division ansng them ~ 10 which enc Il
vas BAishsidsr Asd J. L. Martin for
plaistir. Mossoa ssd Baker for dsiss.
aast
Johs r. Bar1o "a. q. Richardson. Jr.
This Vas ~ action Of rsplsvis for hsrss,
bat lie plsisiif failed TO shsv > title 10
the animal ssd the court directed n yer.
diet for the dsfesdsai Bstchslitr and
J. l. Msftis for plsis.ia. aud Muason
and Baker fer dsisndsnt.
a. n. Gralna sa Ion csaire This
v1 - action Of rsplsvia for ysks Of OF.
e. The plsisiif established bis title TO
the property and the jury gave verdict
Of one csst ssd costs. Bstehsldsr and j.
l. Martin fer plaintin, J. q. Martin and
sprisg for defssdast
Eisrd Eeyaolh rs. Charles Roberts. In
this case the defendant ssld the plaintiff
sons property upoa which there Vas .
chstlsl mortgage to other parties, repre-.
ss1iing that !, vas free from iaeunbsranss.
rcssrving lisn upsn it for security Of .
portion Of purchase price. After tho plain.
TN had paid a portion Of tho purchase
price but before he had paid the whole the
mortgages came and took the property and
,he suit was brought on breach OF wsrran.
tee In sale to the plaintiff After the tes-
,imsuy was in the defendant asked for
verdict on the ground that the plaintiff |
had no right Of action on = conditional
sais to him until be had paid fer the prop
srty in full and perfected his title. On
tho trial il was proved that al the parties
interested il the chatiel mortgage were
present and asssntsd to the sale TO the
plaintiff, consequently they had no right
TO take the property II ho had objected.
A there WAS no question for the jury to
decide the Court ruled pro /orma that
verdict be given for the plaintiff and the
whole matter could bs decided by the
'uPf0tbs Aout@ OstcHriscr hsu ". VI. |
Martin for plaintiff and Musson and Bs.
ksr for defendant
Maze rs. Joseph X. Hema,oay. The 70.
~popaent who was charged with assault
lived ia Bennington and was il court en-
Monday asking for trial. On Tuesday
beisrs his case was called his bondsmsn
received . telegram from him dated at
uoosick ssyiag that his case looked rather
dark and h. bid them IN affsctionats fare
vsll. The bonds were $500.
.Saie "a. C. J. Hnrd This wss A indict.
meat for assault upon OIL Day. Who VA
highway surveyor in Ssndgats, and In re- ,
pairing the road had, ~ the respondent
claimed trespasssd upon Ais Land. And that
he respondent used no more fierce than !.
VAS necessary 10 remove him from Ne
'ams. The claim on the part Of The State
vas that Day Vas withia the limits OF The
highway. that NO trsspass was committed
md that rsspoadeat did use more isrcs I
han was necessary etc. The Jury brought I
: svsrdic. Of not guilty. Stats's Attorney
- Nuasss for tho Stale aud Bstshsldsr Ii
nv l.. Martha fer respondent. This
'nds.'Ns jury trials. ssd the session il !
hrsssL except some divorce cases and /
rourt bus'sess.