New-York tribune., 1884-02-27
'NEwyoRK DAILY TRIBUNE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY a7, 1884

wocntt and o'hers executors etc. appellant Judgment re-
Ann B'Sso @ rcspoadent a William smith, acting qpeT2
tendent of nsnranoo, appellant Judgment ahfmeu VIZ"
In re- account ., James Hughes administration etc Jnds;
mru General ard Of surrogate Reversed ad
he case rand surrogate for further proceents N
accord ne with this opinion Costs Of both parties to be PAID
Jacob K eEecuor etc appellant ag Thomas ~ ns u
Re, respondent order reversed and judgment Oh 9lei
Mary Peek execurx, etc appellant as Pelrck 0a
lagnal r.sp9nden h9Ilin Csin r TSe VassaTr bank
t n. 1 IT, % ny y =, Ic 'syee9tor etc respondent VIII
lam II. Crossnan and others appel elans agt henE 80
man ard others Respondents Ida dabic Tgtpoa@,.ni ir
Lewis II. Bucy, executor ETC. appeant AenI1cs % vian
mch and another executor elG Irsfraor ere
respondent ag Rome, WaterOwn and OSlensnto ' J
others respondents agt Lauren C. Woodruff appellant Two
william ". Prchard Others executors. respohdents
ag John B. Thompson Rdiydualy ana I an2 & ITeversed
and the decree Of the below ed 80 ~ To declare
the beqHes, to the defendant as resdairy gaee he costs
Of both parties to be paid ont Of the estate ,+ ot
Elizabeth ~ Cock, infant respondent and appeAn III
AIandeT Lowry appellant and TesPo9den ,n a. moded
aT%ea % pco1 Without s cost ct tS either Charles
Geetum and another impleadel etc. appellants OiN''
In re Application Of Emily P woosey and another ETC.
respondents, ag W Romsen Tayor and other c1 comni51
Sae thai q SPECIAL rerm aairme3 With costs
Mary ~ Johnson execurx ETC. respondent p az, ants s
Judgment Of General and special Terms Teyef1ea re- u
M mt ordered for the defendants dismssing the con'
Flrin Ball executor ETC. respondent aEt Russell B Bid,
modified by reducing the rate cent rom
June 1880, to September IA, 1881 and as mOdineu
with costs.
tor appellant and George A. White and another
Affirmed on opinion in the OF Tlman agt Davis win
q both parties out OF the estate ,, T.
Albert r. Gladding, executor appella
Folett respondent Judgment affirmed win cOs'H As 'no
appellant personally. -..o,ao,.
George Hollis and others appellants Jndgmet O ien
eral reversed Of Special Tenn modified so as .
conform the opinion Costs O all parties upon appeals o
General Term and 70 this court 10 be pad out OF te
estate. go, r, ,r-ooio-
and another respondent Judgment OF General Iern
decree reversed and hearing odere oeO
Surrogate Cost Of the party finally pevang 10 DC pau
out Of the estate.
Appeals from orders argued
No 719-The People ex rel Clinton b Smith appellant agt
The Of Trustees OF Fushing Appeal from an oIus
order denying motion for mandaIus 10
OF Flushing TO audit and pay the say Oh
latOr a. Justice at the Of 81 900 annum
No 723-The People The Empire Mutual Life lnsur-
No 72s|T2e Attorney agt Receiver Mutual Life
No a75in the matter Of the probate Of the will Of Felix
No 9Ss-The Emigrant Industrial Bank, respondent agt
Thomas J. Clue, impleaded appellant - 4. ..., -.
No 535-In the matter Of Adelaide Clement 70 cOmpe an
accounting by John Waller. special guardian
Motions:
Robert l. Cooke others appellants srt John Prince
respondent; the County Of Kings motion 10 SET
cases down for a certain day
The following Is the day calendar forI Wednesday;
Nos TO- 81, Al, 4s, s6, 10, 80, 20.