The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1884-04-24

Auh State Capirai Affairs iu General,

AUSTIN, April 2.-[Speclal. l-ChArters
filed: Globe Manufacturing company;
Houston; capital stock, $4,000 Keller
| Cooperative association, patrons OF hus
bandry, Llano, capital, $4,000
| Queen City, Ces' county, and Athens,
Henderson county, sent In Applications Tor
summer normal schools to-day.
Duval county - the first TO send up q
scholastic CEN us, showing 5i4 white males,
i26 whice females, 2 coiored males aud
colored femule-lo,al, 973, against 76t last
year.
The adju'ant. general has received no r..
ports about the alleged fence.cuttlng in
ComaDche county.
The Comptroller paid in to-day, $50 o, o 10
the general revenue: Si5 COZ 10 tue avail,.
| HE school fund; Sl5 wv interest and sink.
ing fundon Bye I lty. III
K Pasc county pal $lbonds.in,srest on
court. houtr o., a. and II ,ckwall county
paid over 90. eco for Red RIVER county boDds
purchased Saturday.
The collector of Galveston county was
instructed to-day to perm I lsndS 10 be re-
deemed sold Tor taxes due tor the years
| 1878 and 1915, Inclusive, without waiting
for lists tom ,ne compIvller's office.
The land boa d will convene sgain Tn
award bids on the Sd day of June. Some
OF the small lessess are psyiog annual rents
for lands leased ~ the lost lt,iDg OF the
board.
Joseph Spence, attorney foe " w. Lce
O.dham County, rendered the land board
today SO 800 for ;ha lease of 100 seciions Of
ieod for one year at 4 cent, per acre. 1t
was refused.
A move is on foot at Gslgc9,ou 81 c,n.
| siruct magnificent iron bridge gcr1s. che
bay, and it l. expected the chir'er will bs
n,ed In few days ana ncs,re work ". be-
giu on the work A. sn early dnv.
tor ltl =. Anx fEns
parties by Hlow'ng hcir lands to be sci
fr tsxes waive theu richtto pay the couu-
tv taxes in county scrip. The law author
iz7s the sheriff 20 sell onl7 tor cash ard he
must require oil redompti n to be made in
cash.
7 Po'essor 4. Il Lester, d mu'e teacher II
the deaf aod oumo ins it,i'e, Wss rcnGv d
day b. the Suparintepde0t. No rsvs1h
is assigned Tor rlakiDg the removal.
The com mplroller writes county jIe3eureI
\ thai he is the proper custodian or al
coun'y funds and emitted to fees for d la-
bufsine .he same. Some countr commiS-
sioneTs hEyo taken control Of the couIt
houseSp acs; hence tne sbpve letter.
It. is uNfderstoOd that She povernor has
rendered t&e position Of superintendent o
education 10 Hon. b. M. Baker and that ne
Colonel AHiS,l Saith passed through
TODAY eli routeNtp Beiton 10 attend the
medical convention. y
General McCullooh, \senersl passenger
agent of the Gou'd system, is in the city
OIL important business.
The westher continues disagreeaSly cool
but there is no danger of irost. Cool'Hight,
are iDjuIing young cott'u. Er
Internal revenue collections for Msrch
were as follows: Spirits aud whiskies, $513.
tobacco and cigars, $656; beer, etc, $296.
Total, ST., ,465,
This morning W. Y. Leader editor of
the EyeniHg Disps Oh, was arrested n, the
ipstanca OF Or. Stodderd, prominent dem
tist Of this city, the charge being libel
Leader accused him Of bavirg his office
''pied' and the type injured. Leader
promptly gave bail.
The supreme court affirmed Dallas g.
Wichita railway vs. Spiker, ct. 81, from
Dallas; Holbert We. Oldham, ct. al. from
Flnnin; Willis VS.. Missouri Pacific rail.
way, from Graysop.
Reversed ard remanded: Richoff VS..
Tidbaii ct al, from Tarrant.
/ Motion to affirm on certificate dismissed
Bnopevs Cobb, from Fdnnin; Welch VS..
Warden Ell al, from Collin; Osborne ct al
We. Gunter, from Clay.
Submitted on motion to sffirm on certifi-
cate: Epstein VS.. Holmes ct. al., from La
mar.
The commission OF appeals reported to the
supreme court, to be affirmed: Davis vs..
Dickson ct al from Cook; opinion by, De-
lauey. Payton Ell al. vs. Leon
ard, from Dallas; opinion by
Delany j. Parr vs.. Connor, from Lamar;
opinion by Delanv Western Union Teie.
graph company VS.. Hitson, from Parker;
opinion BY Watts j. Fort Worth 4
Denver City railway vs.. Dabney ct al,
from Wise. opinion by Watts Texas &
Pacific railway vs.. McClanehan, from
Lamar: opinion by Watts, j. Handley
vs. Houston & Texas Central railway, from
Dallas; opinion by Delaney, j. Aeken vs.
Mcdonald, from Lamar; opinion BY
Walker, D. j. Morrill, VS.. Stell, from Lamar;
opinion by Walker, p. j..
70 be reversed and remanded: Houston
G. Texas Central railway VS.. Leskey, from
Grayson; opinion by Watts, /; Houston &
Texas Central railway vs. Booser. from
Grayson; opinion by Watts, j.. Strong
VS.. Curtis et al, from Clay; opinion by
Watts, j. House and wife VS.. Stone. from
Tarrant; opinion by Walker, o. j. Hous.
ton & Texas Central railroad vs. Hicks,
from Dallas; opinion by Walker, p.j.
To be reversed ami reformed: Bumpass
ct. sf. VS.. Spencer ct. al, from Dallas: opin.
ion by Watisj.
In the conssnt case of Henry VS.. Fay 4
Co., from Cooke, opinion by Walker, p. j.
the judgment was reversed and tho caues
remanded.