The Waco daily examiner. [volume] (Waco, Tex.) 187?-1888, 1884-08-02
THE PERJURY TRIAL.
Aldrich Still on The Stand
all Day.
The Details nj a Rigid tros>-EN-
animation Answers 10
questions.

ldrlth. Gu trO->-rNaiillllhltOh. lt>il-
fled H. follows:
lp to the time of the MURRAY trans
action | had been ON very friendly
terms with Major II. ll"had been up
to that time the only agent and Gus
toner in Waco of our house during
my administrations had testimonial
from from Major IT, ~ to the merit,
of my >ulkl pillow and used ii through
out the state as an advertisement i'll
connection with many others. was
on very intimate and confidential
terms with MAJOR H.. the same an
with all my trade; no more 50 and
equally aS much 80. In lsS2 he told
me II great deal about hi business.
assets, etc supposed AT the time hr
was telling me all. but il since dcvcl-
opcd he did not tell me all. One item
he did not tell the particular of, l.
the transfer of this farm, never
knew of that unt:l this year lie said
he sold the farm to Mr.. spencer My
recollection is he sold it for Sl2.Oo0.
1t il in evidence it was tor $4,000.
Nv recollection wa, Sl2.Wu. re
member he said it wa, sold to pay hi,
debts. | think he told me he owed
H.. spencer n Go. So 900 and lac had
reduced il and the farm would pay the
balance. He did not tell me lac had Il
contract to rcpurrhase the farm at
any time. That farm cut no
figure in my affidavit for
attachment. Prior to the Murray
transaction, Major H., place of bu,i-
ness was my general headquarters
when in Waco. lie has offered me
his books time and time again Al
WAYS offered TO me on different Occa-
/ sions. | did not examine thcn At
/ the time of Major IL embarrassment,
he had owed IT, about Sl2,oOo. The
/ Indebtedness at that time may have
/ been about $1,000, may be more or
may be less. Sold IT, the carload of
goods last of November or December,
/ for which notes were given IN attach
| nrnt suit. At that date | can SAY
how much WIS due or past due. Don
know whcth"r any was due or not
/ due at the time took the order. En-
plantation. We had Major H. paper
for portion of this $1,000 AT Nh"
| time took this order All of that
we held. think. had been renewed
/ the second time. | don't know what
/ portion was outstanding of the
/ renewed notes will npproxiuntr
and sny about ST 600. II ma, lee more
or less This \,ns all settled Al ;hr
time of the Murray transaction.
/ think it was paid about the last Of
/ April. At the time sold him this
/ carload of goods, had not implicit
confidence in Major IT. in what he
said. ! referred the matter TO my
house in all lis bearings. and let them
NET in the matter \ pnrt of these
notes drew per cent. and part 10.
| They did moi NIL draw 10 pcr cent
| There were some that drew per cent.
/ think thr renewed note, drew . per
cent. more thnn the original uutcs |
think i'm the r,trNtcn>ion notes there
was no change of interest but ON the
/ second renewal 1 think the interest
wa, increased > per cent iEXpnna-
tionl ACCORDING to my recollection
the first extension was : per cent. The
first renewal wa, < per cent ON the
second renewal the house objected to
ANY more extension, al : per cent. and
Major II proru.rd To Give TO pcr cent
if they would renew. They " rutr me
they didn't want tu renew nt that even.
A. they were not looming money or
goods. But they did renew n, 10 per
cent These second renewals were,
between Minor Ilinchman and my
house. by mail. They notified me of
H. Murray did not tell me nj Tcmplr
that the collateral. were. nut Nv for
UinchuIau'. benefit lie said the
money was borrowed to pay Major II.
and he ~ rot the money. Major II
endorsed for him and hr put ip the
collatcrnl> TO secure the Endorsement
lie stated hc rave Major II. the
money He did not tell me there wa,
an excess, of collateral, nut up to
secure the l.aBcllc X Harrison Wagon
Co. ON the contrnr, he told me the
collateral. were hi when the 5000 wa,
paid and upon my paN ing tine 5000
ihev would come IT, me. don't re-
member of meeting Richardson.