Daily Republican., 1884-05-30
+ # I 4 ED|1|@|
superior l'ou-

'uPorior Court resum.a
at at 10 o'clock this ni mnrni. procesd
on1eI and woa,,bs Justiee and Associate, W. W.
William G. spruancs. n.H'
cat;aa sas attention snt of the Court nsJ to h.
case Of David NJ. EitIallus il
h..s, n. swift, President Of SD 'Ss ". W.
Match Company, and askaS one D.. Ha1
heard. e' and argu
oh account of the amoun,,n.
ot, before the Court, it a.''i, was aS1.SG D' D1d
consultation consa between the at,"'sl, as,ro,
continue the rule and ,oaI, ai,ofltl ne
alternative, returnabie At "@he 'he IN sAs
oer terln' with leave for tae -" "on't 's
.i .he COMPANY to file objection. ,via u
u. ,lon = TO Jurisdiction. The I' c"n,, u
satisfied with this srran.,,'au,s oO"fs
Judge Wootten said he waa,el n, ,ltnE ,a
'". III writing, so that there wml,
10 any mistake about the ,n.,.s. @Ua'
The trial of the Lape vs.. ,'i W",, >.
case was then procee,ied with IN" "
James NJ. Bryan was swarm v r''' -.
tilted that he is a house i,n, nain,., an
business in this city. In lssi i.
contract with Mr.. fape to doa%, n'
OF painting ard glazing on N@i5.
merry, amounting to sG&1, Af.,.
he done other work on difip,rr,
lngs at the cannery ,amonu,nem ~
54, which Mr.. Lape told him VA,
work. ' ~ way
The jury in the Gre"p.Na'o,s,
came in at 1910 . clock, and m ::
to the usual question said ,b,,
had not agreed, The Chief ,Iu.,;s,
ed how they stood, and The n,
replied there were s in favor If Il
tendant, and 4 for the r,,ints
that they had been that way rv4,
the first ballot was taken Aha,
sultatiOn with the other Iaiys
Chief Justice told them fa rpfn
thelr chamber, and try to a !rrp
verdict of some kind.
Thomas Davidson wa, >yorn
testified that he is engaged ia rh4
BILE business in this city; Ap iur1
some material lor the building,
understood that part Of il was nv
work outside oJ the origirsI yI
George |. Spear TESTIFIED tla, h
rooter, and that several c' Ne
ings on which l;e worked were nj
cludad in the original contract,
amount of his bill for this Extra
Is S456 40.
Andrew Carey testified tia, b,
the jackson q Sharp Company
had furnished sash, doors and
mill work for extra buildings
cannery.
Edward Murphey testified I'd
is tin a and galvanized iron NOrk
that he furnished material and dwd
the extra buildings to the amOl
S66S. 90.
Thomas b. Hizar testified d
worked on the buildings in ID
john MOir & Son. The work va
cling and repairing a wal, au
Lspe paid him 1851 for the job.
Edward l.. Rice testified 10 d
tho plans for the cannery buiIlil
upon being shown a draft idelt
as his work; and pointed out the
nal buildings; ard also those on
it is cl aimed extra work wa: LC
Mr.. Bird said that witness aft
ness was being examined TO sho
some work was done undeaM
and some extra, and he askdna
to compel the plaintiff 70 FN1
original contract.
After an argument be'TAIe
which continued for some uu
Court decided that il 1AA
necessary for the originai corNa
produced.
Benjamin F. Perkins 'tstihd
he is a bricklayer, and did 'CM
On Moir's cannery and Other W
for the firm, some Of winch wei
side of the plans and specitca'o
Harry Lape testified that tie
the cannery was done al the reg
Messrs. Clark, kice and MI1
whom are superintendents Of %
of the firm.
At 1910 O'Clock the jury .N'ns
VS.. MaIoney bond case, cane
a verdict that wILr u
lieved that Ma1oney LaN ''gl
bond of his own will and coH"a
a also believed that he was lNIa
sign it by fraudulent rrp'r'eA
N the part of Green.
3lr. Higgins Immediately sM;
hat he would move for a new u
- A. o'clock Court adjoUTIta Wy
, ,'rlOck this afternoon,