St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1884-04-02
THE COURTS.
Causes Set for Trial at the April Term
of the Supreme Court.
Case Of Harrington VS.. Culver Estate Decided
in Favor of the Plaintiff.
Supreme Court.

| supreme COtTt'
The April term of the supreme court as
sembled in its first session in the house o.
representatives at 10 o'clock a. m. yesterday
all the justices being present and large
representation of the attorneys from all parts
of the state.
The first business in order was the setting
for trial of the 118 cases appearing on the
calendar, of causes sent up on appeal, witt
the following result:
May 26-The State of Minnesota ex rel
George Benz, Nathan Myrick, John Schaffer
Albert Edgerton, John B. Brisbin, Margaret
NJ. Brisbin and VIM. G. Robertson, REALTORS
vs.. the district court of the county OF Ramsey
respondent.
April 22-The State of Minnesota, defend
ant in error, VS.. Ole Sorenson, plaintiff in
error.
April 16-J C. Winslow and Lydia D.
Winslow, respondents, vs. the Dakota Lum
Der company, appellant.
Passed-William c. Nash, appellant, VS.
James E. Sullivan, respondent.
May 30-Nathan Myrick, appellant, VS.
Judson L. Moure and L. E. BROKER, i'm
pleaded with Daniel F. Brawley, ct. al. re-
spondents.
April 2S-Margaret Noon, administrator Of
the estate of John Noon, deceased, respond
ent, vs. Andrew j. Flanagan, appellant.
Motion to dismiss offered April 2; if MOI
dismissed, on merits May l. In the matter
of the settlements of the final accounts OF
Louisa ]. Besondy, deceased, as Guardian OF
John W. Perry. Fred. POSTER, administers
tor of the estate of said Besondy, deceased, ap-
pellant.
April 9-R. c. Libbey, respondent, VS.. A.
s. Riches, G. w. Mccormick, ct. al, appel
lants.
April 14-Foster. L. Balch, as administra-
tor, de bonus non with the will annexed Of the
estate Of D. A. Huntsman, deceased, respon-
dent, Sanford A. Hooper, David L. How, ct.
al, appellants.
April llama c. Huntsman, respondent,
vs.. Sanford A. Hooper, John S. DeWolf and
c. M. Hooper, appellants.
May Jacob Leuthold, John Adams ct al.
respondents, vs.. John Young, John Fern, E.
G. Fanchold and the First National Bank OF
Kasson, appellants.
Dismissed April Geo. R. Lewis, appel
liant, vs.. jeremiah c. Prendergast.
April John A. Brakken, respondent VS..
The Minneapolis & st. Louis Railway COM
pany, appellant.
April civilian T. Stone, respondent, VS..
Louis A. Evans, appellant.
April 22-Stephen F. Buenemann, res
pondent, VS.. The st. Paul, Minneapolis 6,
Manitoba Railway company, appellant.
May IA In the matter of the application of
the Minneapolis s. St. Louis Railway COM
pany, for the appointment of commissioners,
etc., damages to lands Of Gottlieb Kanne, ct
al, The Minneapolis & st. Louis Railway COM
pany, appellant.
May 12-Timothy W. Moran, respondent,
vs.. Frank j. Mackay, Harry F. Legg, ct al,
appellants.
May 2-Andrew Jorgenson, respondent, VS.
VIM. Smith, Appellant.
April 2S-Ole n. Skaaraas and A. Gothron,
respondent, VS.. Andrew J. Finnegan, appel
liant. ....
May 9-Albert A. Keith, respondent, vs..
R. R. Briggs and Thomas Simpson, appel
liant.
Dismissed, Ayril Louis M. Sage, res
pondent, VS.. Ara Barton, sheriff, &c.
April 15-Motion to strike out part Of case :;
counsel to draw order-M. G. Griffin, appel
liant, vs.. Lowell Chadbourne, Fred. Mcclellan,
partners, &c, respondents.
April 15-Chas. Heigh, appellant, Lowell
Chadbourne and Fred. Mcclellan, partners,
&C., respondents.
April 2-Respondent motions for affirm
ance-James l. Jellett, respondent, VS.. The
st. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway
Company, appellant.
May 19-Robert E. Mckinney, respond
ent, VS.. A. Fl. Bode, appellant
April 24-Hans Halverson, respondent, VS..
the Minneapolis g. st. Louis Railway COM
pany, appellant
wi, w Tav1nr rac,onndapf We
the city of Austin, appellant.
April 24-William Fl. Laird, Matthew G..
Norton, ct al, respondents, vs. Patrick Moo
nan and W. G. Ward, appellants
April 16-H. Wadsworth, appellant, VS.. A.
Schisselbaur, ct al, respondents.
May 2O-Peter NJ Mark as administrator
of the estate of Axel G.. Hemberg, respond
ent, VS.. the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manito-
ba Railway company, appellant.
Settled. W. Grove and c. H. Roe, re-
spondents, VS.. E. H. Bidwell, H. H. Humph-
rey and c. II. Daggett partners, ETC., appel
lants.
May 15-Thomas E. Madden, respondent,
VS.. The Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway
company, appellant.
April 22-Joseph I. Beaumont, appellant,
VS.. The Board of County Commissioners of
the county of Ramsey, respondent.
May 15-James Bohen, respondent, VS..
The City of Waseca, appellant.
May 9-Alanson Hinman, appellant VS..
A V. Heyderstadt and Peter Henry-re-
spondents.
May 14-John T. Eldridge, appellant, VS..
The Minneapolis s. st. Louis Railway COM
pany, respondent.
May S-Elizabeth Schmidt, respondent, VS..
George Schmidt, appellant.
May 30-Appellant moves for original files
exhibit Edward Mills and VIM. Hutton, re-
spondents, VS.. A. G. Lombard, defendant;
Seymour, Sabin 81 Co., intervenors, appel
lants.
April 3-Respondent motions to strike set
tied case from record-D. Leonard Pratt, ap-
pellant, VS.. The Pioneer Press Company, re-
spondent.
May Laura P. Van Meter, respondent,
VS.. A. NJ. Knight, appellant.
April 21-Thomas Lord, George W. Stout
enberg, ct al. appellants, VS.. John NJ.
Meachem, defendant, and Joseph d. Darling
garishee, respondent.
May 29-George S. King and o. NJ. Lara
way, appellants, VS.. The Minneapolis Union
railway company, respondents.
April 10-Minnesota Lnseed Company
respondent, vs.. John Maginnis, appellant.
May 21-D. Wentworth Hayden, ct al,
appellants, VS.. Charles Keith and Hiram B.
Cowles, respondents.
May 21-Theodore Holton, respondent,
vs. John A. Bowman, appellant.
May 21-Rebecca E. Myrick, appellant,
vs.. Joseph Coursalle, ct al, respondents.
April 29-Charlotte G. B. Hatch, executrix of
the last will and testament of the estate of
Edwin A. c.. Hatch appellants VS. Thomas
Codington and the First National Bank OF
st. Paul, implicated with Geo. L. and c. E.
Otis, respondents.
May 29-James Egan, respondent, VS..
Medara Miller, and Joseph Menard, appel
lants.
May 5-Ernest Buse appellant, vs.. Henry