Daily Los Angeles herald., 1884-04-06
Supreme Court Calendar.

For the information Of members Of the
bar, and Others interested, we below
publish the official calendar for the April
term of the Supreme Court, which opens
in this city at 10 o'clock A. NJ, Monday,
April 7th.
MONDAY, APRIL I'm BANG.
Examination of applicants for admis-
sion to practice.
California s. r. R. Co., respondent,
vs.. Cotton Land and Water Co., appel.
liant.
Mound City L. and w. Association,
appellant, va. J. s. Slauson ct al, re-
spondents.
County Of Saa Diego, appellant, vs..
California 8. r. X. Co., respondent.
City Of Los Angeles, appellant, vs..
Waldron ct al, respondents.
Lytle Creek Water Co., appellant, VS..
Pesden ct al, respondents
Weir, appellant, vs.. Vail, respondent.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL L9-DEPARTMENT ONE.
johnson. respondent, vs.. Hancock ct
al, appellants.
Cal. s. r, R. Co.. respondent, VS.. 8.
P. R. R. Co., appellant.
Cal. s. r. r. Co., respondent, VS.. 8.
P. r. R. Co.. appellant.
Sawyer ct al, appellants, vs.. Sargent,
respondent.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Weiner ct al, respondents, VS.. Horn
ct al, appellants.
Clay ct al, respondents, VS.. Carroll,
appellant.
Dean, respondent, VS.. Applegarth, ap
pellant.
Twomey ct al. respondents, VS.. Peo.
pies Ice Co., appellant.
THURSDAY, APRIL 10, DEPARTMENT ONE.
Hoy, appellant, VS.. Hill, respondent.
Fleming. respondent, vs.. Lewis, ap-
pellant.
Heinlen, appellant. VS.. Centerville,
etc, Irrigating Company, respondent.
Hebron, respondent, vs.. Kings River
and F. G. Co., appellant.
Schell, appellant, VS.. Simon ct al, re.
spondents.
Hayford ct al, appellants. VS.. Kocher
ct al, respondents.
In the matter of the estate of Rose.
Critics, respondent, VS.. Muller ct al,
appellants.
FRIDAY. APRIL ll-BEPARrMENT ONE.
Fleming, respondent, VS.. Hawley et
al. appellants.
Fleming. respondent, VS.. Hswley, ap
pellant.
Blise, respondent. vs.. Kaweah C. and
i. Company, appellant,
Paige, respondent, VS.. Rocky Ford c.
and l. Co., ct al, appellants.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Bailey, respondent. vs. Sloan, appel
liant.
Kruse, respondent. vs.. Chester ct al,
appellants.
Miller, appellant, VS.. Jewell. re-
spondent.
Newbill ct al. respondents, vs.. Thurs
ton ct al, appellants.
MONDAY, APRIL I4-DErARTMENT ONE
City of visalia, appellant. VS.. Jacob
respondent.
Morton, petitioner, vs.. Superior Court
Tulare county, respondent.
johnson, petitioner, VS.. Superior
Court, Tulare county, respondent
Meyson. respondent. VS.. Chabris, ap-
pellant.
Cal. s. R. R. Co., respondent, VS.. s
P. R. r. Co, appellant.
Cal. s. R. K. Co., respondent, vs.
Western Development Company, appel
liant.
Cal. S. R. R. Co., respondent, VS.. s.
p. R.. r. Co., appellant.
King. assignee, respondent. vs.. FELTON,
appellant.
TUESDAY, APRIL l5.-DEPARrMENT ONE
Calkins, respondent, vs.. Stsinbach
appellant.
Boorman, respondent, vs. City o.
Santa Barbara, appellant.
Stoddard, respondent, vs.. Williams si
al, appellants.
SCHUYLER, respondent. VS.. Broughton,
appellant.
People. etc., respondent, vs.. Mullin,
appellant.
Alvord Con. Q. and Mining Company
ct al, petitioner, W. Soule. respondent
Durfee ct al appellants, VS.. Garvey,
respondent.
Beusro, respondent, VS.. South British
Insurance Co., appellant.
Cruz, respondent, vs. County Of Los
Angeles, appellant.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL l6-DEPARTMENr ONE
Cox, respondent, VS.. Ireland, appel
liant.
Cox, respondent, VS.. O'Neil, appellant.
Buell., appellant, VS.. San Francisco
Savings Union, respondent.
Broughton, respondent, vs.. County Of
Santa Barbara, appellant.
Alemany lArchbishop), appellant, vs..
Ortega, respondent.
Estate of Higgins.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Thomas. appellant, VS.. Crow. respond
ent.
People, ETC.. respondent, vs.. s. P. R,
R. Co., appellant.
Robarts, respondent, VS.. Haley. ap
pellsnt.
County of Los Angeles, appellant, vs..
City Of Los Angelica respondent.
County of Los Angeles, appellant, vs.
Morgan, respondent.
Reynolds, appellant, vs.. Scott 4 Co