The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-06-14
THE COURTS.


AWN.NN.N NI N"|N.NHMNM NN|NNN#N N||".NANN
to to merits ~ tlf cas-; Dallas City rail
aav company W. Hill; from Dallas county
and Houston & TtNis Central railway com.
pary SIS. Jackson; from Limettoue county.
Williams yg. mo state. ir1m franklin
county. Appellee, was convicted OF the
t1cl o. horse belonging 10 one Bouts, SUD
pfc puuI# lmnit affixed at hNcen years inn
pf.8Ir mont iD tho pani'eutigry. In the
record brought bc'1fc this court on appeal
there 81 no sin'emer. Of fncl7, nor bills Of
txgPltilus, aud go the absence ot these in.
gtruu .niai there appearing no error IN the
charge OF the court, and the indictment
boicg good and sufficient, the judgment Do
ca way ". the State; nom Baslrop
county. Agrgllans brings mp this nppes.
ir0wu jldsmens OF conviction for lhe tLcll
Of % horse, iuE which he was as ssed o pun
ishmeut Ot five years imprisonment. An
inspection OF the record sho vs. the evidences
ample - support the judgment. The
charge of the court Is Puiiclent
sud the indictment being lppar5ut Of
record Tho judgment IS affirmed.
Boliu VS., the Sts'e; from Orange county.
Appellant was convicted o. On assault With
intent 10 murder one Mounts, for which
his puui5hmrnt wa assessed 40 two year9
in the peniteniiary. The charge Of the
court sufficiently defines malice and agra.
waited assault Besides no exceptions were
| AshNAAA ~ NAH iAalHFs aWA NbHA" AfN AhahA ~
tons asked, and beyond tbs no error
prejudicial 10 delendan. gppearl. The evil
dencn Is amply sufficient. Affirmed.
Full e. VI. The STATE; rom Bell county.
Conviction for the tleit Of u. @. simmons
calf. Punishment gsGesgod, tTo years i'm.
prisonmcut. The evidence IL amply sufi
cient 10 support tie judgment. The charge
OF the COURTS full, tair aud impartial and Is
not subject 20 objection. This indictment
is good and sufficient and no error being
apparent Of record, tho Judgement IS or
brmed.
Dlrrsll ". Tho State; from Guadalupe
county. Conviction Tor tneit OF cat
Ne. Paqishmsn. a3ses1ad az TWO
years imprisonment. Tho test,
imopv OF the accomplish Neal
IS strongly ana thor1ushly cJrrob0rnted,
and the evidence i8 auiiClenC 10 support
the Judgment Of conviction. The charge Of
the court is iuil md correct, ana tlC ir-
d.ctmeDt being sufficient aGd no error ap-
pearinR OF record, the judgment ta affirmed.
Breeding VS.. the Statc; from Milan
county. In tria Casc, 40 % former dey OF
ibis term, Tho iucgmcu. wac affirmed, the
court hold us that 40 was within their
pr vince 10 presume iuri.d icti0a Of the
case, that r., that the. term on the county
court ~ watch tno CONVICTION was had, had
oeen provided for o3 thq c1pn'9 COO
nissiOncrs cQur., as required BY law. This
motion for retcaring IS based upon The nl.
want 1f p1Werin the court 10 co pre-
sumo iurlsilc'1T, but tho cOnrt etll holds
tina. it has such authority. The judgment Is
affirmed.
James Lynn vs, the State; from Milan
county, no. 3i7D, and J., loynes Va. the
Srate, from Milan county, (N0. 3l72), in
volved the same queilions presented in the
cave Of Breoiiug We. the Ststa, suprs, eDd
upon the authority Of .hat case, the judg-
ment in these cases arc affirmed,
Dorsey alas MCG1ee w. thu State: from
Brown county. Conviction for the theft OF
a horse. PuuiaEmeut assessed, six years
imprisonment. fnis case is q companion
case u that o. Bleyirs w. the State, af-
OF @ previous day OF this term, and
pp2u the authority OF tnas case, the evil
ie-ca in this case being amply sufficient TO
the Judgment, and The charge of
the court ana Indictment being good and
sufficient, this judgment is affirmed.
Elliott W. Alexander; from Bell county.
This cause was dismissed at q former DAY OF
this term hgcsusO the as isumout oi errors
not fled II tho same time the bond
filed and beo;uHs the appeal bond Wal
i.-cficiruf. go fhHt i- DID not contain tho
nhmB Of AL the parties to Ia. judy
meut. Taig motion 10 reinetate
Is D sed o. the alleged error Of tho court IN
nader The rules az courts eId the statutes
governing IN auol matters The judgment
correct. Motion overruied.
Everheart W. Isbell; from Grlvg)n
This cese Is one OF facts, ia which
the evidence Gustains tho ver-
dict. The charge Of the court
is uGocj ~otiC1Gble. As 10 the
sction o fthe cour. Ia permitting witness
to testify who had violated the rule, fuch
matters are within the discretion OF the
,ourt, and a clear abuse must be shown 10
The prejudice Of appellants rights in order
10 reverse. II this ca-e the evidence nd-
iucei from theee witnesses was not euch
IS could have eff ctsd the final result OF the
lasa or the ytraici II the Jury. Affirmed.
Santos vs.. the state; from Fno county.
"a nude 90 dismiss this appeal be-
OF ihs escape Of defendant pending
be appeal. The pr1por affidavit being
made by toe author I'D oliosr and filed
The motion 10 granted and the APP
zeal dismissed.