Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1884-03-06
RANDALL'S BOLT.
A Statement that He Will Vote With
the Republicans Against MOrrisOn's


the Republicans Against MOrrison's
Tariff BilI.
New York Herald Washington special:
The discovery that Mr.. Randall had SO
eo.apac.ed his forces &ad- prepared his
plans as to make the defeat of the Morri
son tariff reform bill certain, and probably
enable him even to prevent debate OF the
bill, has been the only topic OF conversa-
ton here among the Democrats to-day.
All see the extreme seriousness OF the
situation. Some of the weaker brethren
whimper over it as the destruction of their
hopes OF political honors but the reform
ers generally welcome the issue Mr.. Ran
dali has determined on, and the leaders
are discussing the best method to bring on
this issue. One of the leading tariff re-
formers said to your correspondent this
evening:
at was inevitable, and it will clear the
political skies. The Democratic party will
die as the old Whig party died, because it
is a house divided against itself. 1t cannot
longer be party both for and against re-
| form-for and against protection and
monopoly. II the Randall wing can boss
it, then let the Randall men elect their
ticket. They will not get five States, and
Mr.. Randall have the satisfaction of Civ
ing the Republicans an overwhelming
victory. But it remains to be seen
whether Mr.. Randall can rule the con-
vention, where he will not have the
assistance of Republicans. At any rate.
this is as good time as any to see if there
is Democratic party"
CAUCUS PROBABLE.
Hitherto Messrs Carlisle and Morrison
have not proposed to call a caucus on the
taritI-reforIn bill, but it is now probable
| that, as soon as the bill is completed III
| he fp 10
House, caucus will be called upon it,
The reform Democrats will have, OF
course, large majority in this caucus
they will welcome full discussion of the
measure by its opponents in caucus, but
will insist on adopting it as party meas
ure binding upon all who remain in the
caucus 1t will then be seen, not only
whether Mr.. Randall will leave and bolt
Democratic caucus, but how many men
he can draw out with him. 1t is said thi:
evening that he has a following secured
of sixty men.
WHAT coCKRELL, OF MISSOURI, SAYS.
"Have you seen the statement in the
New York Herald that Randall and othel
alleged Democrats are going to vote with
the Republicans to defeat the Morrison
tariff bill ?" correspondent asked Senator
Cockrell, as he rode up to the capitol in ;
herdic, this morning.
"Yes," said the Senator, 81 have seer
it."
"Do you suppose there is any truth il
it,"
"Quite likely" he answered. "Thinl
it very probable such will be the case
Joy go with them, l say. The sooner the
Democratic party is rid of such men the
better it will be for it. l am not afraid tc
see that sort OF an issue made, and brought
out in sharp lines, as this will. If this il
done they may seesa combination of anti
protectionist Republicans formed to sup
port Mr.. Morrison's bill. AT any rate
am quite content that we should be rid o
anybody who would boil the party anC
defeat so important an issue as this"
SOME Truth IN THE STORY.
From what can be gathered among Ran
dall's friends it is pretty evident tina
there is some truth in the story that h,
will lead his wing of the House Democrat
against the bill, taking over fifty vote
with him against the bill. 1t is said tha
he will take four from Alabama, two from
California, two Louisiana, nine from Ohit
and twelve each from Pennsylvania anC
New York.
WHAT MR.. RANDALL SAYS HE WILL DO.
The Sunday Capital to-day gives the fol
lowing report of a conversation in which
Mr. Randall stated the course he proposes
to pursue in the House toward the Nor
rison tariff bill.
In looking at the situation Ex-Speake
Randall in conversation said: "I hav,
marked out my course for the future 81
far as my action on the tariff in the Hous,
is concerned. | do not wish to say mucl
about it now, rs it is a little early, bu
when the time comes shall make mvsel
be heard on the floor of the House. Thi
tariff question has been ranking in tn,
Democratic party long enough, and
think it is now about time to eliminate i
entirely as political question or else set
tie it within the party one way or tn,
other. There are some Democrats VIII,
have an idea that the masses OF the peopl,
of this country are jealous for free trade
when the lessons of the campaigns of tn,
last six years at least demonstrate tn,
reverse. For instance, in the las
Presidential campaign the Democratic
party started out on tariff-for- revenue
only platform, and with what result? II
/. the Gubernatorial elections in Indiana,
State that was put down as Democrats
for certainty on that issue, we were de
feated. Some say the State was carried By
corrupt means, but the industrial inter