The Waco daily examiner. [volume] (Waco, Tex.) 187?-1888, 1884-07-11

------------
part. --e-V!c.. Poe p-iAWay oi tN-
.i,caee ..e- Den..i u-. -,rewh WIN
iue wreck II oar -i.Lrc-. I-f. NJ 1e
iDle-'t lei U- -taAd ~ nc record Oi
DG- cWh rcpuJ!lr, aud let Us noIu!y
appc. ~ TAG people on that record,
AuG -pu-H the ..uuc.A.e tIDmi-e7 Of
our b.tler IOe-. Tue name Of 7uca a
uian sc bring You. n- praclcci hand
ANA tA per .e"ce" i".es q h'' "- 0GN
Fti-ahie WIN pHpII All il'-' "'H 40!
lie lJuuuA'lva7 oI your .tihtH 1"
power - DIyad, 20 wac, 80 decP,
ihat they VIII tc peru.u"h,. Ap
pjausr. lie had been practically ihc
icaGcr III the house Di tplc7cElaiiYc7
tor seventeen YEAR, iavor;ng g
reduction of taxes ana economical adj
min;-tration OFT he government. lie
had. wi,. skin and sIccc-s. resisted
The lavish expenditure Of tn money
OF the people, the waste Of the public
domain aud unconstitutional sur
render of force bills. His iron VIII
hns uut the knife TO corruutiuO extra
yipiiance. and compelled the return
tn rnmusrativn unriiv nf .dmiuistrn.
tinp. Z. l rp tg
a ,'r,,d ,,.it',,,,af ~ ,t, ,,pa,,,t,. a,d -
.,7,nI,,,,, 70 ,a., g,..i,,,.o lin .,ud
-, tri'a,..
=" ''i ..'n ''-,' ''.'" i,(.,,l
rine! ~" p,eSo'it' ~ VIC i,O'''o ,l,,'
" ''O niO'' '''
Dieu III coh'ehtioh' a. hcl
",nt % Wv : Ii'eu TCu'ca IA ,lio p1tno'i l
"nd nLnors i''N'''''' '''N "Pi'''''"'
5o', IoNc.hoI hppo,s, % NeW S, oe,Sey' sec, %
;i ','e ,o ,I,
,h',,,',,'>,Is =, .ta I,,,aa1.,,,,n ,>,,rt,, ;'
,noki,,,, ,I,t,nr,o hrn,'d a,,,i,,,,h h' tor
cv'.r,, dc,nn,,r.t tn stand mon and in
plAc,ng uuon il candidate of ABILITY
and purc life succ SIS lies IN the rcs,lt OF
their dciiberatlon and Ii. believed that
Samuel j. Randall, OF Pennsylvania,
as the presidential candidate
wonld reach the controlling vote Of the
pivotgl States more certainly than any
other Of the distinguished meu named.
He asked whore does success lie: Not
III Minnesota, not III Iowa or other OF
the confirmed Republican State-, but III
those close state which were carried by
lHueh III 30, ne re'lc"cu Tue arRu1
nieutH uI9eu Ior Ci"sSiand' aui sh'u
'hey are ali "pPiIeu 70 Ihu' liian, bayaru
"hu o''iciH' tien "h"' cHou9e =, ''Ie'c Al"
pu''I"s ao'aO 'i -" M e--'oo," .''r', ".'i
~ p,oii ,,Ira a,,d ,o,,,Iot'
Vubila 49, ,ni,I;c ,.,r.er for ,,pau,r
ve1rs has hern i'm hehaIf of an eoon.
1,nic.I oud honest oovcru,nant
,rt,,,'. ara rracticoI ornrt. for ra
foru, n.,nt.I wouId .u.on Nntv
,.-,. 49,. . a,;.,.a, a,..Ia,.
o'N ',ho Ho@' fT'iti1" f'i' o;1'ono' n'.
ne Is 'le i'ien" oi iaooioi vr'i
"hVic' aht 'lo ooii 'on'toh 'oui'' w
~ pctte, 'iian iioi,'iii"'. nun.
!c o"ii VI .nu .oiI v. ,,Dii iCi no'n''
''H'ioi "'S 'i, mn 20 u'''su' 49,.
4aI" po."s '"ne' WV I''a'i '''i'u OA ''ia'
u.'csa'ioi annJuaco" I1.ne, '''', "na. ,."o'0
''ii,' NM NJ .'"U''t".D W nc, NJ
no"o''i oNaii Ia" - -, - vac
"A'hueet.S ucieSati1h' 'aio 'n"l "1"
lh"l 7tatc was 'a'icu !c9Veiuay '"t
p'c9clteu no hahic' hoW ~ ocIai oi
majorlty oi that ucieea'ion, Hc
ASKED that Mr. Johl W. Cuih-
mlhgs mlBht second me nomination
VI Mr. ha!atu' Mr' cummings 'hch
r'ihc forward 10 the p!atioTHl ahu ad-
dressed The convention IN support ol
me nomination ol Ihoa' r. Bay yard,
Oi lie aware. 1t had been sad that |
the electoral vote Ot tie south was |
sure Tor amy Democratic nomination. |
The south had kent it's faith uuia!ter |
iugly and uulliuchiugly, but II must |
be seen. too that no delegate in the /
convention co,nmittcd himself ia a /
nomina,ion ar a uoui,,.e Thst /
would in some dcorac imnar, ,hr-.
a,stns in ,Gn t,,',re, 1rtn -, ,,,..,
whom the Democrats could g,vr
would be no,n too ,,ood to- 0c,rrv ,f,.
hnnmSr "f Iho Dou,Snrsor sWy ~ ond ,n,,o ,,,
','o n',l Cn'Dr' 'r,, "'i, n .on'
r''O 49,, w. i''Sn '0' 'i'' ,o"' O1'''oI
'"I! ~ ,N1 'o"','' anu pu'o "H" Lis Il
an" oA"i'o" as 'lc "o'llihee oouiu DC
~ ~ Uhc c"uid DC more 50 'haii no.
hay"ru' ol Delaware lChcers.)