Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1884-03-12
.MURpHyRAI1a'
oon'lnoe'l from 49,

tillll IN the conr, urlhyi'
opera house. lie to /, ~
Christmas w ,p,I = me d
, ,,,ol and my imp pss 'sitsIs:|
was the same iysslOn In
s.. sent \ , her the s,o Jay ~
and he pressed a Slim, In " h
som SOM OF her dress, T ,S ~ .i5ae|
conversation ,l with him ule : "a
and ID f i5slas ' az ia Jay I. ! met sis 3
ierent story. lie saiS \, lsliI,
court and She failedton ~ !, sa
anGe H.. ! told in conS Sea, l9 I;
ana ana Mr.; Malone Of tbe \. "
lion at the time. ~ nis'es
Met Mr. OILS Ea,or
Pickwick. Mr.. lsston, q "
had dispositions shown, 'e 4
the little pifl that XXI Astsil
eelyed or seen the box p 4 a nai I.
was shown him. Hsalssaa la
wards that lie had ,leN s NO "
where the candy an paIs' a
from, and how tiey ~, !, a'' z
ply. He wanted : III 70 Aa
to The effect that The I at,sn,.,
would take pleasure IN =
would show The proofs. \
Mr.. Powell ofthe Gsl t' als !
him. Mr.. II. NJ, Furm,'ss "
Geo. s, Eaton came Il !.
and called Mr.. Powell off
ell afterward showed him Y
introduced by a statement \.
that gentlemen IN n
Know gave the infcrns
dispatch showing he -
be u bogus allah.
Endorsed on the back ~ 4 4.
from II. NJ. Fufman andCIa.'
making themselves resIs sSss \
dispatch. Mr.. HALEY Va i
produce this and il va, NM
by Mr.. Powell and read. !
Mr.. Ball took the paD., 4,
qualifying him, asked MN,
compare the signature a X i
with the name Eaton Ii II N
NOUS letter. He did 50 and
the resemblance most rerI,Is
expressed the judgmenttlass
written by the same psrty,
Crnss'examined,- Or. Nun
permission 10 publish lhe <.
of the candy case.
j. N. WILLIAMS
Had examined the letter
to him. Saw no resembIsps
the genuine and disputed
Miss Murphy. Had ey,rl
anonymous letter and ce,,
with the genuine writing 4
f. ton. The handwriting IL
semble that of The aAOnynq,
but it appeared taking itgsh
I've done by the same psny.
ters written by Mr.. Ealostr,
~ Adams office were then i.
and the wateI-lIark Of
mills was read by the Wire
paper ON which The dsp
were written We're also pies
the water-mafk Of IL
mills distinguished. n
ey note showed ths l III
period OF the ng
The quality Of The pare d
nounced the same. a littE
the printed matter ofih1
heaven letter was shOvr t
perceptible. By adjusting
of Beall & Adams lelisls
was shown to bea pcrtimd
Tex 1851 This was I'd
not sent from Besll { aas
but Mr.. Ball said he VaAs
. it came from anotherpis
Another letter vs' AeIHE
Ball said he wouldSvfn
by the party who ShlNn
Adams Office
"Be CAREFUL said Gtsst
That was ali he vcaasT
continued.
Mailing clerk Of the Log
ing Company. Had 6tt' Z
the newspaper aud " Z
years. tHad examine
mark on the letters moi ~ |.
inc. All these nOies W /
letter heads, used BY Qua, !
their correspondents, !,
reference to whether ID. I
used by ladies, tue " \
objected to. 40 !
Mr.. Ball said ne o'a n i
client ever wrote o llls !
[Applause.l When I s1ss 1
to be on the same pa
Eaton used it shoseTsa y Z 1
: on the transaction; !. MI . ).
Mr.. Fnrman saidlllaa, d
business man has sons i
) heads at home for coIlaI 4
!, would not be testimony h
lady did not usually ". WIZ b
per. Would Mr.. b,ll'
, snr n M, man to commit pa Z
, could Go, L 's show that Bs NJ. ! I; {
tie only parties lDs 4
! with this wateI'nalnsi iai 4
bearing, but he ny J, Z
} sky-scTapia l,s, .aan 5ssisis /!
p plause AN and hisses. ,' rs h
admitted ,l,aate i, By 8 t ,I'sl FL !,
; edge e S wsnt 4 ls lhsit CO.. s'ai
o os examined The Z 4
rest in referspss11,I.a B
!. &C. cro oaa * Tie .satssnid i
PPnpoW, ghs '' wa. sDs
jJ ee;tedd d to ' one lsEIdssls !
l ln,sa os sheets e 1ha Y
sheets. [ApP,Isaulls'ssI ,,l !
~ l;,.s,t :. Xalh" l
Of it. ~ 1
Had a good g. 81, q.
in examining Ii d
often came Up. /
Since plr 1s40. ~ /
anonymous lel!a
Inc ,eiters Of Ealoa "a