The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1884-09-05
A rLINsY rpErEyr,

could not do for them what he did 70
\ many Others It would seem so. L. &
VI. "A rL,NsY rnrrEyr. 4
: M trna fr,a,d n; I'm worL;n, o,,.,os' /,
; New York can for a moment deiend in,
veto Of the Five Cent Fare bill Govcrno
Cleveland believes he declares, that 1t VA
unconstitutional, but why did he not n
with the Telegraph and Telephone bill
md the Oleonlargine bill and many o.he
important measures which were oppose
on the ground tllat they were unconstitu
tional, sign tho measure md let the court.
settle the question: This Is where til,
matter belongs. 1t y Tor the courts mt
not for Governor Cleveland 10 decide
The veto q the Five Cent FIRE bill, 1t !.
asserted, did not interfere with the work
inginen Of New York inasmucll rs til,
nye.cent commission hours arc now eslab
lished carly III the mornin. and early Ii
the evening when workin.men travel. Il
is true that the rate Is only five cents III
the early mornin. and early evening, but
1t Is ten cents tho rest OF the day and
nigh. But DO workinglncn's wives and
children all travel only In the early morn.
ny ana evening? How about tho Sunday
vacation Of tho workingman and his
iamilyPF How about tho large body oil
clerks and struggling business men who
DO not ride during commission hours?
pEyouScEp NJ clEyrLAYp's rp,ryns (,
Thu fac. Ia The F;vo.eo,,t Ea,t, ~, ,a .
acrcntei avon hv tLo Nav Val. ~ ~; ~, WY,
hc tXaJ inau ,in ir;o,,,s ~ nft,1a '1s a
Nc ev;denco thnt ho waS noS, ro H,"II." ~;
nronar ,,,ot;ras az T y' S to' Wy ~ ~.
pitnr Tho vote so;d 49, W" Ao'N 'Ms'
Now. mi tha I:a,os,a. a,,. -,
scrunu,o"s ron"r, g. Nv ,; st.s sloMn ''ls
ra,ei raI,aeS m ~. rn1 ,,s'''s VI tio e,e'
vote soma ottant;na V ~ ~ n.y. nm w.
ueonie . ia sa,.s ba - ~ r,sn's ot .he
rornor.,;ans % I!a ~ - .ut aMase 1'iat VIC
e,l an~ns ,5n a's' Z! ahy ntlau', !otielt.
have tho remedy 4 nt n % s mnd.r Il e
;m' NV ,ol'euy - Nv l'.',o, "nuer exist
.ne Jaws eNeeuted--lie can, without any
nnrcntlv i; r;.oi ,,,,, ,e, nuI % MS a.
,;ana nl..Gu knowleuge o. the re''-
ton wh;c was crdpto ",' !, " "n ..c Gorpora
nj ,h";r 1neS ' N'''.e.' ~ y e''c't ''e'll ous
i faw .,n"s ,,,o, a., r..,
There 10 ;,o 'r raasa ~, "ss s.''u: -.
thc chortor =; , .Ia WY .M.s lrEpeal o1
f,ounanvl sla .n1 Nv, III ia.llway
Govnrnor ci","la m 10y To-. 10 none, ous sihcc
ia ,annao i.'s -. ass s.he. thc sac Of
Ma No ra,'a,, l.; 10 ~ t'i; ;. WIN tne PEG.
Tba New 1Y nrts M ill., J,,G (; w vetoed.
nuncatorv r s,;J Morcl, .,I Iso .,,ofc w.
Gornr,o. cio.a j. .i hns 10, ., io9 ~;
NJ lawver ns N n"h;n 's sn ,''ae ms enolee
noj;,;";,o H. H. u a,,n. spIaser, ana US
II tho nro,t ~ oann s ss; nls los on stlc siec
n,on;n, .o.L ~ a.',i ul'u cotponele
intns, moi;t;o,,, ".u s.aAea us CHANCES Tor
Tho ;t;oai W IiI'. .i IN thelr layor.
t tae i'o,isieai ana aesa! principles to which
are OF nuel, broader application than to
the elevated railroad fare question. They
have a direct bearing upon the great p6-
lltlcal issues that are taking shape in tile
national arena.
March 8 the New York York Herald
said::. pt--
These settled principles arc applicable
to the questions raised by the Five.cent
Fare bll!. norClevcland appearsto be
overlooked them. In his veto message,
which is substantially copy oil the brief
Of the counsel for the elevated roads, he
omits reference to many decisions, nor
does he cite single authority in sunport
Of his own y;eWs, This talk aboi,t n
breach OF pllghted faith Of the State is
mere suhteriNge, The peonlo ara M,
willing to accept tho Views of either tie
as decisive Of this important a,,esti tap""o
Let It be remembered that when Cieya-
land vetoed tho FIve.ccnt Fare bill. the
lawyer who represented the corpontion
was Francis G. Barlow. Barlow is now
one Of the Independents advocating ,ha
election OF Cleveland. ~ ST. '''
}aE 4in.nnx,,,u son ~. !, -,
Not on,rib, ~,
biusn mn r.. H. ~ 'stom wv NY sMN1F
,;na ~, UHs " wv a'e oi 9!her bills, invol.
fam ~ IN w t5Ii WV tt t OF !he wei
land rcwca 1li KY u.u movefnor C1eye.
for instance tho bii whir na ness, IaKe
nr ths lnst snss;on ., ~ VIII, . NJ signed dnr-
yi3inr TINT Mi nersons ac,;, s s Els
in New Yorl. n;;v 'nnst SIh' n;s 7" o I'll:
IL nuaiif;cnt;orn M inj INV !a,o Il ss
each u;ar iSt y r . ~ n tuH " MH -
mss I'M rcommrn}iin%, .Mo.io Wu"M W
the;, Gnn,i ' ~ liz n. ~ prove
form hid cSsn rnon ,r re th a,,es ,ey per
a Certificate: but whe9 o ere ~ E'E lor
their rneanr, earnin"s ~, el' nai,a' RON
alter they Iayc nrnve5 H. ~ Nsan,
to nav m aa,ai tax q eash
.ar IHco;;,m m ~ ,,,or,;, =. - s.s"' Wy ,nW'
ton. ii: any olthsE p}sss Gxea t thiEsS NAV?
Why, shoNla engineers he singled out
aG VICTIMS ot this imposition? II is
noticeable TINT this law is now being resist
ed IN the courts as unconstitutionai,fort the
Observation-Disclosures for the ,pyYinS ofun-
Just tribute on nTiTsta individuals Tor pur-
poses IL witch The compulsory contribu-
tors had ~ n! interest: GoyemoF Cleveland,
Who was 50 hhssty in vetQpg tho Fiye-cent
fare bill. ,hetaAsc he feared It was uncon-
stitutional, did not hesitate to sign the
bill taxing engineers, and leave ii 10 the
victims Of this imposition to t;ghi It, as
they arc now doing in the courts al New
York G!!ttS;, II will lie borne in mind that
n.avioNs' the Inst meeting at The I.ce|sia.
turc tho certificate nsytoak ri the nature
of . permit to take charge pt boilers, etc,
and to nerfccm the duties Of nm onn;nenr