The Sedalia weekly bazoo., 1884-05-20


Same VS. j X Barrett same entry.
Same vs. E Lamy same entry.
Same VS. John Kaiser; same entry.
Same VS. j w Wills; same entry.
Same VS. NJ Harter; same entry.
Same VS. e Thompson; same entry.
Same VS. Adam Fischer; same entry.
Same VS. J A c Brown; same entry.
Same VS. Dan David; same entry.
Same VS. E Bixby; same entry.
Same VS. s II Beiler; same entry.
Same VS. w B Brown; same entry.
Same VS. John +. Antes; same entry.
Same vs. Rod Gallie; same entry.
Same VS. w Middleton, same entry.
Same VS. II Kahrs; same entry.
Same VS. j III Mertz, ct al; same entry.
Same VS. l. Deusch; same entry.
Same vs. Laupheimer Bros; same entry.
Same VS. NJ Ii Sibert; same entry.
Same VS. ID Sicher d Bro; same entry.
Farnham & Gilman VS. Missouri Pacific
Railroad company; motion overruled for
none pro tune.
VIM. Armour VS. Jno Walmsley; jury of
six by consent. Judgment for plaintiff
for $3.50.
g. @. Tillman VS. E. Brown, continued
generally by consent.
VIM r Allen, Executor snd August
Breueke VS. Mrs Bette III Gentry, ct al; L
M Trumbull appointed guardian for infant
defendants Ruby, Charles, Sallie, VIM II
and Reuben Gentry; judgement by default
defendant; Mrs Bette II Gentry.
Margaret Balliett, ct al VS. Jacob Balliett,
ct al. DISPOSITIONS in behalf Of plaintiff,
received opened and filed.
NJ E Smith, ct al, VS. Gideon n Barrick;
continued generally.
Wells w Taylor VS. ] Frank Tomlin; tried
yesterday by jury. This is damage suit.
1t is charged in a scrapping match between
two farmers about a line fence that, that
In the match Tomlin struck Taylor with
an iron crowbar, hence the suit of Taylor
for damages did by the blow which frac-
tured the skull. $4,000 damages is
claimed.
sECONDDAY.
The case of Will w. Taylor VS. J. Frank
Tomlin, occupied the greatest part of the
time of the circuit court yesterday, a full
statement of the points involved in
this case was published yesterday. The
yesterday afternoon, when the argument
was commenced, and was not concluded up
70 the hour of adjournment.
The following is the record of proceed
ings in other cases:
John Meyer e. Co. VS. Geo. Brown and J.
w. Burks; dismissed as to defendant
Brown, and judgment by default against j.
w. Burks for S172.O0.
Louis E. Fisher VS. F. G. Crowley ct al.
plaintiff files reply.
Cyrus Newkirk VS. Johh Pohl ct al.
by agreement defendants have leave to
answer sixty days after. this term and con-
tinued.
Frederick Hess VS. Adam Hess defen-
dant files answer TO amended petition.
Isaac Adkins vs. Adam Fisher; motion
to affirm judgment of the justice of the
peace, taken up and sustained.
.f.<,a. THIRD DAY.
The case of William H. Rhodes VS. Will
liam Bryant occupied the greater part of
the time of the court yesterday afternoon
and up to the hour of adjournment was
still pending. ..r.
The following is the record of proceed
ings in the other cases:
William Gummery VS. M. s. Conner ct |
al; by consent motion to dismiss appeal |
Withdrawn and motion filed by plaintiff TO |
affirm Judgment by justice of the peace, is
sustained and judgment against defendant |
and his surety on appeal bond rendered &C.
cordingly. -.-......
William Armour VS. John Wamsley
defendant files motion for new trial.
j. w. Harrison VS. r. Il. Yocum; set
tied and dismissed according to stipula-
fions filed.
Fred Cline VS. Jacob s. Schuman; jury |
waived and cause submitted to plaintiff;
granted leave to amend statement of cause
of action.
In the case of J. Frank Tomlin VS. Wells
w. Taylor; suit for damages, a verdict
was returned in favor of the plaintiff for
$3.50. - -.'''7'i -a
FOURTH DAY.
The following is the record OF proceed.
ings in the circuit court yesterday:
State ex rel Brown VS. Union Trust Co.,
of New York plaintiff enters remitter as to
Mount Sterling township tax and dismiss
ed as TO that demand motion for new trial
overruled and defendant excepts.
W. s. Horr ys Mo. Pacific Railroad Co.,
garnishee of George Beene, alias L. A.
Gra~ garn,shee files answer to interroga-
tories.
S. A. Gage ct al, VS. Sieeel & Lewis
plaintiff niles motion for order of sale.
John w. Burress ct al, vs. John ]. Yester
ct al defendant files demurrer to amended
petition and also motion to require plain
tiff 10 give security for costs.
Johanna Herman VS. Gotlieb Herman,
divorce plaintiff files motion for monthly
aiimony.
P.J. Turner VS.. Samuel Turner divorce;
Judgment by default
Stringer & Shobe VS.. o. 81. Coe, gar
nishee of Morris West; defendant files
motion for discharge.
n. V. Gorrell vs. Jos. B. Gorrell, admin
istrator pendent lite; dismissed.
ID. 7. Abell vs.. A. p. Espenchied, gar
nishee of A. d. Fisher, ct al; garnishee
files answer to interrogatories.
Maggie V. Stewart VS.. John w. Stewart,
divorce: judgment by default
Eddy, Harvey & Co., VS.. o 81. Coe,
rsrnishee of p. M West H ID. Strinoer