Democratic Northwest. [volume] (Napoleon, Ohio) 1869-1894, 1884-11-06
Proceedings OF the Court OF Common
Pleas OF Henry County, Ohio, at
the October Term, 1884.


[Reported for the DEMOCRATIC NORTH
WEST by Samuel Facey, Deputy Clerk
State OF Ohio vs. Wesley johnson. mol
lied.
ed TO the Ohio Penitentiary for five years.
State of Ohio vs. George Carr, recogni-
zance forfeited OF $500.
State OF Ohio VS. Martin Dermedy, Recog-
nizance forfeited ofs2OO.
State Of Ohio VS. August Lindau, no in
dictment.
State OF Ohio VS. Simeon Pickens, no in
dictment.
State of Ohio vs. Henry Terry, no indict-
ment.
State OF Ohio VS. Phillip Heckler, no in
dictment.
State of Ohio vs. Rachel Halter, no in
dictment.
State Of Ohio VS. Herman Benine, no in
dictment.
N H Hartman VS. John Welder, John
Ryan, Peter c. Lewis and John A Lake,
decree in favor Of John Ryan as prayed
for in cross petition.
James H Phillips VS. Almon Eaton, con-
tinued for maturity Of notes.
Henry L Weaver VS. Mary Huston,
heard and submitted.
Richard Brayne VS. John Nagel, contin-
ued by consent.
Lorenzo Anthony VS. Mary O'Hagan,
widow and administrators, ct al, contin-
ued.
Anthony Wright VS. Adam Long ct al,
continued with leave to file supplemental
petition in 80 days.
Justin III Tyler VS. John Hills, a minor,
August A Hills, minor, ct al, finding of
decree for Plaintiff. Defendants gave no.
tice of appeal.
Francis M. Rummell vs. Zera Marvin ct
al, demurrer overruled.
Edward s Blair VS. Mary A johnson, A
G johnson, ct al, continued for maturity
of notes.
Rudolph Fenstenmacher ct al VS. Abrs-
ham Fenstenmacher, continued.
Nelson E Mathews VS. Joseph A Stout,
Samuel NJ Heller ct al, continued under
former order.
John Layhe VS. Mary Jane Bark ct al,
settled and costs paid.
Anton Hahn and Daniel Hartnett VS.
William E Dibble, continued for maturity
OF notes.
w. H. Brownell, as assignee of II f
Cary vs. Eliza A Abbott, continued for
maturity of notes.
George Morehead VS. Samuel Snyder ei
al, verdict for defendants, no cause of ac
ii
Anton Giffey VS. Geo Buckmaster and
Hudson, finding for plaintiff, defendants
to pay costs.
Hulda H Sheffiild, administrator vs.
Johnathan D Norton, passed for examina
tion of report.
Abner L Backus & Sons VS. Herman 3
Woke ct al, report confirmed, Geo Daum
receiver allowed 1920.
Anna McWilliams VS. Byron Yarnell
continued by consent of parties.
Michigan Stove Company vs. Thomas I
Rowland ct al, continued.
Abigail Matthias vs. Robert McCaskey
dismissed at plaintiffs costs.
Mahlon A Thomas VS. Otto Honeck ct al
continued on showing Of defendants, a
their cost of term.
Carlo Call VS. Mace Baer, continued a
defendants costs OF term.
in. High, receiver vs. Frederick N
Adams ct ux, dismissed at plaintiffs cots
JN. High, receiver VS. s N Groscup an {
r r Bemiss, default on note and mort
gage.
Henry Bockleman, vs. the w st L & I
railway company, continued by agreemen
leave to make receiver party defendent.
Herman Bockleman, an infant vs th'
w St L & P Railway company, continued
by agreement leave to make receive
party defendent.
Chas H Gidley, as Treasurer Of Henry
county, O., VS. Edward B Magil, ct al, con
tinued for further decree.
G H Gidley, as county treasurer o
Henry county, Ohio, vs. Otto Honeck, ct al
CHI Gidley, treasurer Of Henry county
Ohio vs. William A Tressler ct al, heard OF
motion.
CHI Gidley as county treasurer VS. Sa
rah H Van Fleet ct al, default in favor o
E R Greenough $2s, continued.
CHI Gidley as county treasurer vs. Flor
Viers ct al, settled and costs paid
Edward s Blair vs. Wen Cowdrick ad
ministrator, off docket.
Hiram Cole VS. Joseph Hull, leave t.
answer instanter. Continued.
Hulda H Sheffield administrative, et
VS. Heidlebach brothers, dismissed with
out prejudice at plaintiffs cost.
Hulda H Sheffield Administrative etc VI
Heidelbach Brothers, dismissed withou
prejudice at plaintiffs cost.
Hyde & Oakes VS. Adolph Geiger ct al
continued by agreement.
Elijah Sands VS. Jerry Glass, demurre
overruled, defendant has leave to answe
in 80 days and continued.
John Bensing vs. William H Ellis, con
tinued at defendants cost ofterm.
Napoleon Planning Mile VS. M Haag
finding for plaintiff, judgment.