The Lake Charles echo. [volume] (Lake Charles, Parish of Calcasieu, La.) 1876-1898, 1884-09-06
District Court.ProceedIngs,

ADistricG COurt.PrOceedIngs.
District Court convened last Mon.
day, and the following is synopsis
Of the business transacted up to our
going to press:
Jacob Ryan VS.. D. NJ. Foster-Mo-
ton for order of survey of land from
which it is claimed timber was ille-
gally cut. Order granted, and amend
ed petition fled.
G. Barbe VS.. ]. Il. Shattuek ct ais
Amended petition filed praying suit
be revived against the heirs Of one of
the deceased defendants.
Ed. Sam VS.. D. ]. Reid, Sheriff. ct
ais Motion to dissolve attachment
fled.
Clement Bros. vs. Their Creditors
Peremptory exception of no cause of
action filed by plaintiff, in the matter
OF the opposition of Mrs. S. W. Ly-
ons and others.
). Cooper d. Co. VS.. David Morgan
Preliminary Judgment BY default.
J. 7. Trahan VS.. Jean Castex-Pre-
liminary judgment by default.
B. f. Desbrow vs.. r. .. Cessford---
Preliminary judgment by default.
State OF Louisiana ct ais, Maria ].
Gibbs vs. Thsd. Mayo, Clerk, ETC.
Rule taken up and heard mandamus
granted, and rule made absolute, or
dering the Clerk and ex-oficio Re-
corder to place the act of sale in
question on the records of his Office.
A. H. Moss VS.. D. w. Wilmington,
]. 7. Cooper, garnishee-Preliminary
judment by default against garnishee.
B. Sweeney VS.. A. Dobbertin, ct al.
judgment by default
against Mrs. M. B. Jones.
S. j. Wilcox VS.. Bush & Thompson
judgment against both
defendants.
w. r. Stewart & Co. VS.. A. J. Per
kins, ct als.-Defendants' peremptory
exception was tried, argued, submit
ted and taken under advisement.
Preliminary judgment against N. J.
Rosteet, one of the defendants.
Succession of WIN. Smith, final
tableau - Judgment homologating
final tableau.
J. Ira Ryan VS.. D. II. Lyons, sher-
if, ct als.-Peremptory exception of
no cause of action, filed by A. J.
Kearney, District Attorney.
Geo. w. Ryan VS.. d. ]. Reid, Sher-
id, ct als.--Peremptory exception filed
by District Attorney. Preliminary
Judgment BY default against d. j. |
Reid, Sheriff.
w. H. Rowe vs.. d. II. Lyons, |
Sheriff, ct als.-Peremptary excep-
tons filed by District Attorney on |
part of parish Of Caleasieu.
Succession of d. J. Reid-Motion |
fled by Geo. w. Ryan for rule on
administrator to show cause why said |
movers claim should not be paid.
Friek o. Co. VS.. Shattuek Bros
Referred, to take a rule.
G. Seeligson & Co. VS.. A. Rig
maiden & Co.-Motion to dissolve
attachment, referred to the merits;
Prayer for jury filed.
Legierse d Co. vs.. W. G. Fricke-
Judgment by confession made final.
Henry Wesh VS.. Adolph Hebert-
Judgment by confession made final.
Ulhman, Lewis q Co. VS.. w. G.
Frcke = Judgment by confession
made final.
A. @. Elmer VS.. VIM. Sterling
Judgment by confession made final.
]. S. Brown d Co. vs.. WIN. Ster-
ing-Judgment by confession made
inal.
III. Wesh VS.. Jerome Hebert-
Judgment BY confession made final.
Herman & Grossman VS.. Mitchell
Keough-Judgment by confession
made final.
@. III. Schenck VS.. II. G. Miller
Judgment by confession made final.
VIM. Sterling Vs. w. d. jenkins
Judgment by confession made final.
VIM. Sterling vs.. w. d. jenkins
Judgment by confession made final.
w. Il. Haskell VS.. Thos. Reynolds
Continued.
M. ]. Rosteet We. ChRs. Bell and
Diver Bell-GarDishee. Preliminary
Judgment by default against defen-
ant and garnishee.
j. S. Brown " Co. VS.. R. ]. Cess
ord Preliminary judgment by de-
ault. 1,
]. G. Muller We. VIM. Vineent---Pre-
minary judgment by default.
A. Greeuleaye ct ais. VS.. Lastie .
eut-PreIiminary judgment by
efault.
L. Cooper & Co. vs.. G. 3. Jackson
Preliminary judgment BY default
lade final
A. Lehman q Co. VS.. VIM. Vincent
preliminary judgment by default,
III. 9. Farquhar ys. ID. y. Reid,
heriff, ct als.-On motion Of plain !
ifs counsel this case is discontinued :
plaintiffs cost. II
Thompson A. Ashworth Us. Amos
erkins, administrator Preliminary |
ldgment BY default :
.etGer G-om Hickory Branch.
I