New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-05-03

IA OptOa!lDu tOStlo evidence admitted against
him. md 70 diNoee he en- and further maintain
that in case involving that which Is most sacred end
most dear W AimDs honoi-h nc should be pero,ied Ms
nd ad tic presence ~ counsel Hfo1gtom the attire pro-
coSieudod for this principle In the Hutchinson case
and think that judge Lawrence recognized his de-
cson ios la cumming ~ the result Of the eases which
(H5 aud JgD 's'o~'ed o. ne eA@r1f, o"d 10 be jA'y
"Fuly G.ld JGyiy hcUd." How can he he "Odiy and
f4'riy Aeoya" unless IA the way have sagsesiedi
plaintiff than tho Hutchinson case wa. In tiab
ease. ch4rge ~aS mo'ie; a Subcommittee was
mntoe made a report jus, as they did here. 1aoy
made BOoB the charge 20 The parry and todd him
up ana answer anu nc cAnle up ana answered specifically
10 e charge. Bus wnon be got through they did exactly
Nv trends have tried TO get up a contradiction with
Mr.. Fatt out there is h0 contradiction hii point.
They AL asTee with Ma Psti tsst when LouDai had cad
what ne hI - say ihey bowed hm ont without aay IN
tiuatiOu chat they intended 20 take evidence
without any htiAaioa tAst they dad already taken
II the committee had M to expel him upon his
own admissions. upon bs own statement, IL would have
been very Different case. 40 not admit, that bs
admissions would lave justified expulsion hut | doD't
/ think tEat Ou could get any nse men In tho Union
! CIaO to eApoi Inn on .wDAt Ae stated himself
On tai, point, reiCr 10 what judge Lawrence said In
| tie Hutchinson
determine WA,ihcr II would have been competent for
tho Governing Committee after Hutchinson had read his
ano"or to proceed immediately 70 vote npon ,he a1e,
ton OF his expulsion Ii may DC conceded mat they
Of Bdh BrOUwUr after Hutchinson had retired was 10
Iy mind, uusi aud un!ar to the Latter and am Of gao
been made eonDing tae power Of this count 1in-
tetcIc Ia Pr9Geeai5 o, tdis nSoIV, t ~
uer eighth poiut to be the true rule IN snch case
is presented winch calls fos the nterposition Of tho
court"
WHAT THE EXPULSION WAS BASED on.
My learned friend says that they all understo0d that
when Hutchinson had got through that that was the endo
it, Understood IN no other and way than Patt and
Ioubat understood when the Governing Committee said
Ne have nothing m0ro to say to you. Good evening
ami out they went The Committee bd not zoe n to acc
AMI at ala we're SAT
MS own statement shall show your Honor by and ~
%ieb he should lave been iiI spoiled
What ala tley do They called two other Witnesses
whose combined testimony appeared to charge PIT Lou
bat with something that lac lad diSiE0wed ~1cA nov,
eyer lie bulk fhe offence lOr which, as shall
show, they proceeded to eApel HIM No ~Or1 OF IL az
pears IA his own testimony On me contrary. ~ IL ho-
Then, without informing him what that evidence Sas'
lthout informing him what conclusions the sh,-oo
HAN NoTF what /. the law on this subject / want
,ocate the next last month My learned friends
tasy do not asrc 70 lib law why don't hcy agree his
awl Because they know that 1t Is absolutely fatal TO
tlGir ease. when your Hchm pt INC pue't9n 70 tn'M
the same thai Judge Lawrence did ihtI STOOD dhhb Ap
Judge Lawrence says that the proceeding Is governed
by principles OF natural Justice They are very fond
OF natural justice. We viii let them have ii in full
ndrc Lawrence further holds that there another class
bear very close analogy to those Aud what are thcyi
The OF arbitration Judge Carter AZ tue newspapers
because II is in pgiiss which for the benefit OF the
members Of the Union Clubl will translate. IL means
controversy between two persons Therefore he says that
law applicable 10 arOitrdOrs J, not applicable 10 he ,ON-
eIning Committee Of exchange club. did not
succeed in seeing the segt1 al. because Judge Law
does not refer 10 the arbitration eases IOi Tue l"hs
wherein they der hut for the point 81 ahaio8l NAch
Mr. Carter sys j. the rliHe point namely, that they arc
goNened by tle principles OF natural -tice dIeIs i
Gov enin Committees OF Clubs anu exchanges 10 LActy
agree. II il This: That the parie TO the arrangements
have agreed That certain persons shall be tier udo amt
shall iiy them in particular lnnnner ghat 1, the point
poifjon of law we do rot see IT, and my friend did nos
this But your Honor Gees tie exact ldeut! be-
Two ar irce or ionr men say: Well We viii arbitraia
differences the judgment Of 4, D. and c. iloG-
-nd come togo rama agree ia "lllhE til il any
question misconduct tie part Of any OF them comes
up they VIII nave At decided y the melnbes o. ne COY
Cuiug Committee, or tWo-iird- ~ them IN Inc case Ok
northumberland Tire analogy i c"se very e'9e anu
very lerec-has there ever been any aoub' aat II tAo
arv ohcT evidence or listen % myhing that mi-ht b.
amy poSS by affect their minds. their judgment Is al
want to cali your H0nof's attention 10 what some
sreat JUDGES have aid upon this subject
n VA Objected T." him: WHY CSC aIItraors were per
~ i,,,.o r,r. to be- sure they. Heard something
that somebody said GtfrHc PoItles hGd!b Jm HDg 1m
not 0Vur 70 0gcc' ht'r miaiS.-
Aud they say hi, Governing Committee say. nay d6
pof eIOr u 10 egoci Hf,r misde would Ike 10 aee
he dd NOT convict the ignce OF willing aud Henry
In the case decided BY Lord Edon tUII.er Is. Eo-
Sshe VS. 5Gl ,c an ai ,se py ec5 S al,
not 9a,ogf ID, Dis son Jr FL poi' i L2 aS.
G .o Il, that '' which cannot re'oacte to g-i
egsj rpp,iries. A j,4,e a,ssi NJ a.e rpm EaI-
;el u Ell s.etC eriaecl ''pP?'g ciLsl . M %.
hoor do"e pa.eCi f,sir', d" H''a ge'erH irnc4tes
c.Juiv ts sdpP.Yed'
In Drer IS Drey . Nacq II. 1. crs !, another great
Ivi~h TO DE understood not In the slightest degree
quo,t3-As or iu-nuoiinsa Doubt a7elst I anl.oIi-
,- "l. nave been y, titd To-. ille ho"u i"dl ~ -
'.' % 6 s S'i ny 1i u IN ~. enc lii
hc back o. party WHO j. interested m cm1o' gIIms or
,rrcd TO- bat IL there hl been none, aF,r With L0d
lld,n. that Ae F'iueIe, Of universal ja-tic" require
o,t TO De- sent 10 hear it tscn 10 suggest cross
animation "r lp-e!l To gro. cE3mnt aI To- .' a. j. 70
D." IN l'j y.r. 65 i5HE. O. D. SIS. F.ttc,au. Jus
tie. another great English judge. sld;
1t i, true nat the erroneous proceeding -eatei toa
Nrry saH matter, bat II IL were sanctioned ia Gag IN
stance TIE rei,1oes la Sfe,y cAe q" Jaht aTol'@ioh
mig agree 10 carry on tAtIi H4mi;s. al4,lL ,4r,
uphold this aWani would b. 10 autlcille proceeding
contrary 10 tho fist principles or iNticc.'
Finally, in Dy6s2j GrOres q q H. G37, Lord Dcn-
f@ court must abide by the general principle and
oppose al attempt, To explain, 10y tho hc'rnS ~ par
t,ar parcels ot evidence whether the inquiry had
.Tb 'i3 deci3n Wlra o.cc me i.e /, 5,opgt
NJ III; the gTerf D.1nrioie tyI po,sb4ly al me tfgi.
oofsm Day haze bon 5iasc He.e Is asU0t ls OJ-
Yoaf Honor Mood not go beyond Che ccorcd casos IN
thl- stale Icer 10 t,o case OF L.sdea. - Ae G~a--
dun NufuH LIE Insurance Co., g. n. l. an
fu.t case a pa-c i05. ihc Court sail; But
any violation Of naa7i justice by an arbitrator such -
j. ocHg Dl,trtoi c'tt,"ce from o"c 81 ne "te iett-
T., Eaotieiyc consent Of me 0lr, should 6r
dc4Htd'
\ MAN MUST KNOW WHAT HE Is CHARGED WIN.
Iu.it 20 citing ry the score w,icii Tally Sue
tain d1ciriuc laid down D. judge Lawrence. But
WHY should weary lour Honor why sioHid 10 moro
tan proceed 10 amply Tie doctrine To- ihc iaci oil ms
ease
Ono thing ID iad down. as Il seem, 10 mo VITA giras
clrsiD-- lu the iutcuu-or aud lt Che winch
our louor titc,i 40" Common rrl- namely, taat
IL IL A n. Ii. L. MI |.