Mexico weekly ledger., 1884-01-31
Circpit Court C,lnnxs.

w. Quisenberry, Logan Munday,
]. S. Craig, S. T. Hook,
Joseph Davis, J.. n. Coons,
r. G. Graham, lee. Brown,
J. N. Roseberry, A. A.HaEr1son,
j. N. Drumheller, s. o. Wright,
d. NJ. Hill, Caleb Berry,
J. Sisk, r. Smith,
E. B. Norris, VIM. d. Sims,
VIM. Keath.
Up to the time of going to press, the
court has disposed OF the following
cases:
Gentry VS. CLARK, continued generally
by agreement.
Dryer VS. Crews, judgment by consent
for $50 with 6 per cent.
Firebangh VS. Firebaugh, order of sale
cash and balance 6 months with 8
per cent.
Franklin VS. Muldrow, death of the
defendant suggested. George Robert
SON admir- estate enters appearance and
cause continued.
Martien VS. Downing, continued.
Luckie vs. C. & A. R. r. Co., on
plaintiffs motion dismissed at his cost.
Crane VS. Smith, alias and continued.
McCabe rs Underwood, plaintiff en-
ters appearance.
q. B. Crews rs d. P. Dryer, motion
to set off judgment filed.
Lincoln University vs. McNama,
motion for security for costs filed;
motion t o dismiss filed.
Butler vs. McNama, motion for securi-
ty for costs.
WaddinGham vs. Hulett, exception to
report Of referee filed.
johnson VS. Wilson, seperate answer of
Barnes filed.
vertrees vs. Hughes, motion for Sc
curity for costs.
Herman VS.. Collins, bond for cost
filed.
Jacobs VS. Criswell, answer filed.
fled.
Drake VS. Uzzle, answer filed.
City of Mexico VS. McIntire & Rollins,
motion of McIntire to dismiss, over
ruled.
Patrick VS. Farrah, motion to dismiss
case fled.
Vancess B~lankenship, demurrer filed
southwick VS. billiard, motion fol
bond for cot filed.
Robertson VS. Woodward, motion to
strike out a part of answer 6Ied de.
murer filed.
Bishop VS. C. "a. R. R. Co., motion
for bond for costs fled.
swinney VS. Earsona, motion for bond
for costs filed.
| Barchard VS. Moller. motion to over
rule and strike out plea in abatement
| filed.
Swinney VS. Carson, motion for bond
for costs filed.
Crawford VS. Draper, motion for new
trial overruled.
Silver vs. K. G. & st. L. r. R. Co.
amended petition filed.
Allen & Carson vs. Hathaway, motion
to vacate order filed.
Glascock VS. Llewellyn ct al, defend
ants enters appearance motion for bill
of particulars filed and sustained.
Graham VS. Masonic Mutual Benefi
Society, answer filed.
Henry Porter VS. Woodward, motto,
for bond for cost filed.
Proctor w Rawlings, motion to strlk'
out Rawlings offsett filed.
Blythe .ys Blythe, W. H. Kennal
guardian ad litem files answer t,
amended petition.
Allen & Carson vs. Hathaway, mo
ton to affirm filed. sf.as
P. Mclaughlin VS. Hannah, demure,
to plaintiffs petition filed. -
White VS. Baker, motion to dismiss
by consent is sustained.
Southwick VS. billiard, motion for bono
for costs sustained, rule on plaintiff I.
file bond for costs or to deposit 81
within 60 days anys and continued.
Lincoln University VS. McNama
bond for costs filed.
School District 6, so, Z, VS. Coil, re
port of commissioners approved AMI
decree of title.
Blythe VS. Blythe, judgment of par
tition, commissioners A. B. Tinsley
Jabez Robinson, J. NJ. Daniel.
Graham VS. Masonic Mutual Benefi
society, demurrer.
Lindsay VS. W. St. L. & P R. r. Co.
amended petition filed.
Herman VS. Collins, by consent con
tinued.
; Bick vs. Yates, answer withdrawn an
judgment for plaintiff for $325.15, IS p
cent compound interest.
Bergman VS.. Wabash, st. L. & P. f
B. Co., Demurrer to new matter in d.
PENDANTS answer filed.
JAW. Barth VS.. Wabash, st. L. & |
r. R. Co., parties ready, jury, W. I
Quisenberry, E. B. Norris, j. F. sisl
) d. NJ. Hill, G. S. Brown, Logan Mund!
j. NJ. Coons, s. T. Hook, ]. n. Rosei
berry, Joe Davis, W, NJ. Sims, Wu
Keith. Verdict for the defendant.
, David Weder vs.. W. A. Harris, nj
ton for security for costs fled.
Village of Laddonia vs.. Bridgfor'
pldlltluo cAtCis appearance
: Lindsay vs.. Wabash Ry. Co. contil
ued at plaintiffs cost. leave to answ'
) in 60 days from this date.
,, Houston etal etal VS.. Jones, motto
for additional cost bond.
: Bergman VS. Wabash Railway CO
plaintiff withdraws demurrer and tax
!, leave to amend petition in GO days al
continued at his cost.
=. Brooks VS. Wabash Railway Co., CO.
tinued at plaintiffs cost on his apple
ton.
Gregory VS. Wabash Railway c.
defendant filed motion 70 strike or
over ruled; defendant declines to fu
" ther uppear. Judgment for $50.
+ Rice VS. Hunt, motion sustained.
8 Laddonia IS Bridgford, motion
n dismiss.
Lincoln University vs. McNama, lea
to answer in 60 days and continued.
Dawson VS. Wabash R'y. Co., jud
ment by consent for SIS, each party
pay bis " costs except adjudg
costs, which are payable as adjudged.
9 Allen & Carson vs Hathaway, mott,
ovcrrplad