Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1884-07-10

tn address tho convention. He said
he should he ylad TO second
Mr. CieyeIand's nomination except
that he knew that the gentleman
could not carry New York. The sure
and untiring Test on that fact was that
the last Democratic convention of
New York was euuaiiv divided AGAINST
him and the Democrats at large were
divided betv,, on his friends and onno-
nerts.
At this point Rravc of yviscon.in
rose TO make noint of order but his
voice was drowned nv shouts and wells
from the galleries. Amer there was
some degree Of order Rragc stated his
point TO be that the order of business
was the nominaiion of and secondiny
of candidates
The chairman said n .;m;Iar po;pt of
order had heen made in tha al J.ouis
convention and sustained. INT he had
| been disposed To he exceedinclv ,enient
| in allowing the course of remarks ann
nosiny thai Mr Grady would come IN
Inc point of making n nomination. mt
unless he was about 10 do so The chair
| would be obliged to sustain the noint.
Mr.. Manninr chnirman of the Nav
| York deieyation- asked unanimon
consent thai Mr.. Grady might no Al
lowed To nroc, cd irresnective ~ the
point of order. Unanimous consent
was given and Grady proceedei with
his speech. He said that the object of
| the convention was To make n
nom,nation for tho pres;dancy that
| would he ratified Inv The nronie mt the
nolls He did NOT claim that the Irish
or the Catholics were against MIR
| Cleveland. hut the anti-mononillst
elements Of the state and the lahorinv
interest Of the state c.tholic and
Protestant Irish. German and Amer.
lean were opposed to his nomination
and would be amused In hjs eler,ion
Mr.. cleveland had been elected in 1850
nv majority of 1o3 600 Int the last
election of tint state showed a Ranmh-
jican maioritv of IS 5o7 making n
n change ,,f oil 600 In the Democrstic
vote.
Here n good deal of impa,ience was
manifested nv spectators and ,houts of
"sit down. came from the galleries
Threats we're made that the Galleries
wonld he cleared and Grady was nj.
IowaS 70 On ~, with hia sraach hut
not without continued interruntions
from, the galleries He WAS told In
make n sncech for Rjaine' Int the
chairmap announc.d With nm mir of
denomination that the gentleman
should have fulI and fair onnortu.
nity 10 saw every word he was entitled
to. Grady went on To discuss
the veto of the elevated
railroad I'M and IN sbou, howthat ve,o
was iriurinns 10 tbe working classes
and h,. declared that the state of New
York could NOT he carried NV Mr..
Cleveland not becsuse of any
Iri.h mr. Gstholic nnes,ion In,
hecause NJ tbis ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
question In which tho nnp,j,.
lad a daan.seated f.aling. that No man
f could he worse 70 them IN that r.e.ard
than Mr. Clawaiand Va Gnew of I'm,
one occasion on whinb Gov Clev..
land was calied mnon to show
: his hand ,yb.thar be yas a Denoncrat
mr. somethinr else and CLEVELAND
} nroyed nj th.s t,n,a soma,hina also
. He dsniod that Tho aoht acajms,
| CieveIanJ wos III. same anht ~ !, d
3 been made against TiIden
e A motion for I. recess .t This tim.
was made and lost
! II Tho cond;data uao 10 ooua f,o,
4 New Vorl, a man should ba taken wiz
l would nor he ant.ynnized hv these nm.
r tsyon;s,ic elen'ants hnt The Dan,orsc,
: nf New Work ,ook NO snch noaition
5 The Democrecv would carry Nav Yort
A for Thurman R,vard McDnnald n,
Randall hut not for Clawalapd
Nav York was n safe state n the Dam
8 ocratic marty vas Eant solid Int M,
: otheryvise
!. Cochrane If New York IN beba,f n
t the minority of the state delegation
4 came TO the nlatform To second one nj
1 the nominations but wanted 70 90 int,
a statement of the New Yori, nolitic,
S TO which Bragg of Wisconsin, Objected
+ aud against Which he made a noint o
order which was overruled. Cochran,
declared. amid shouts of incredulou,
5 laughter, that no person felt NOR,
: kindly than he TO Mr.. Cleveland. but Ia,
: was too old friend of his TO wish I,
e see him nominated for the presidency
:. He was asked to give the name of tn,
e candidate whose nomination he sec
t onded. HIS answer was, he would
/. name man who never could he callet
y guilty OF single act not favorin,
# Democratic INSTITUTIONS; man wh
n mas never prostltuteo executive powe
q 70 veto piiis that were conserved II
# tne interests OF lapor' u man Whos
Il mar hau grown white IN the service 9
d MS country, ne meant mr' Inurma
# OF ONO out ne ana not nam
~ nim; why, ne asked, shoul
% the Democra,ic party plunge INTO I'd