St. Paul daily globe. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1884-1896, 1884-10-08


d. NJ. Osborne & Co., appellant, vs. Charles
Marks, respondent; Nov. 20.
James N. Granger, respondent, VS.. Major
Hall, appellant; Oct 8.
n. c. Olson appellant, VS.. John Hurley, re-
spondent; passed.
Henry Schmidt appellant, ys. The Board of
County Commissioners OF Stearns county, re-
spondent; continued.
DaVid NJ. Swain, respondent, VS.. Benjamin
Knapp, appellant; October %.
r d. ingalls,, respondent, VS.. H. E. Cheney,
appellant; passed,
Jacob II. King, appellant vs. Ellsworth D.
Childs and James Hill, co-partners, ETC.. re-
spondent; November 5.
The Mile Laos improvement company VS.. j.
Dean & Co., respondents October s.
North Star Iron Works company, respondent
Martin Strong, ct al, and j. b. Creener, as as
signee, ETC., (Charles L. vance,, appellant; No
vember 81.
Hugh Mcmahon, respondent, vs. n. B. Austin,
defendant; Langdon Shepard & Co., garnishees,
Merrick and Merrick, claimants (MerrIck q
Merrick), appellants; submitted on briefs.
Thomas j. Leftwich, respondent, vs.. j. W.
Day, ct al, appellant; November II.
Charles NJ. Goss and Jacob n. Paulson, part
ners under the firm name and style of Goss 81
Paulson, appellants, VS.. Levi n. Stevens, re-
spondents; October IS.
Edward B. Zier respondent, VS., Joseph r.
Holm, appellant; November %.
Charles Heigh, appellant, VS.. Lowell Chad
bourne and Fred Mcclellan, partners, etc, respon-
dents; October o.
NJ. C. Griffin, appellant, vs. Lowell Chadbourne
and Fred Mcclellan, partners, etc., respondents
October O.
p H. Mantel, respondent, VS.. The Chicago,
Milwaukee d st. Paul Railway Co., appellant;
December 2.
The Minneapolis Street Railway company, re-
spondent. VS.. the Chicago. Milwaukee s. st.
Paul Railway Co., appellant; December 2.
W. w. Cargill 81 Bro. and James f. Cargill,
respondents, VS.. the Millers' and Manufacture
ers Insurance company of Minneapolis, appellant
November 10.
ners, ETC., appellants, VS.. Libbe 1. Gould, ct al,
respondent; Nov. ID.
Charles P. Craver, appellant, VS.. j. A. Chris
tian, L. c. Christian, ct al, respondents; Nov.
25.
F. ". Frisbee and NJ. E. Frisbee, partners,
etc, respondents, VS.. Horace Poole, T. +. Gil.
liam, ct al, partners, ETC., appellants; Nov. 10.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS. Peter
Sanrer, appellant; Dec. /.
The State OF Minnesota, respondent, VS.. Fred.
Kuphal, appellant; Dec. /.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. Con-
rad Bayha, appellant; Dec.'1.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. George
Kantler, appellant; Dec. l.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. Gus
tave Deisting, appellant Dec. l.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. Henry
H. ODER, appellant; Dec. /.
John Wass, respondent, VS.. Isaac Atwater, ap-
pelant; Dec. 4.
Arthur n. Jordan, appellant, VS.. Charles C..
Secombe and Emma T. Secombe, respondents,
Dec. 4.
D. NJ. Osborne & Co., respondents, VS.. Israel
Poket appellant; Dec, 5.
d. NJ Osborne & Co., appellants, vs., Charles
Marks, respondent; Nov. 20.
Andrew E. Holm, respondent, VS.. John Sand
burg, appellant Oct. 10.
The Merchants National bank, of st. Paul, re-
spondent, VS.. Peter Hanson, appellant; Nov 10.
Daniel Griffin and Lucinda Griffin, respond
ents, VS.. Geo. W. Farrier and r. P. Mathews,
partners. ETC., appellants; October 30.
The Minneapolis & Northwestern Railroad
company, appellant, VS.. IL. Roberts, respond
ent; November IS.
Peter Wolford, appellant, VS. Geo. n. Baxter,
Arthur W. Mueller, ct al, respondents; De-
cember 8.
Barney C. Tierney, respondent, VS.. The Min
neapols 81 st. Louis Railway company, and the
Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway
company, appellants; October %.
John Bandy, appellant, VS.. The Chicago, st.
Paul, Minneapolis 81 Omaha Railway company
respondent; submitted on briefs
james Clarke, respondent, VS.. The Chicago
st. Paul, Minneapolis 81 Omaha Railway com.
pany, appellant: submitted on briefs.
Fred g. Herrick, respondent. VS.. the Minneap
oils & ST. Louis Railway company, appellant
October Q.
John H. Hall, respondent, vs. James Torrent,
appellant: November 81.
Elizabeth 5. Johnson, respondent, VS.. W. r
Kenyon and IL. r. Moore, executors IN. E.
johnson and Carrie NJ. Johnson), appellants
November IL.
Henry L. Peevy, respondent, vs.. the sehulen
burg Boeckeler Lumber company, appellant
November 5.
David NJ. Swain, respondent, VS.. BENJAMIN
Knapp, appellant; October %.
Charles Il. Salberg, appellant, vs. David
Wright Willis L. Perrin and others, respondents
December II.
Ann Bryant, appellant, VS.. the city of st
Paul, respondent; Dec. g.
Syert Larson, respondent, VS. Northern Paci
6c Railroad company, appellant: Nov. &c.
James Cain, respondent VS.. A. ID. Libby, ap
pellant; Oct. 30.
Joel f. Whitney, Helen NJ. Ober, Martha C
Whitney, Florence E. Allen and Henry P. Good
enow. appellants, VS. Robert B. Smith and Saral
B. Smith, respondents Jan. 5.
ORA NJ. Woodward, respondent. VS.. StepheI
S. Glidden. appellant; Oct. 90.
Henry W. AlsOp and Charles r. Alsop, co
partners, &C., respondents, the st. Paul, Mime
apoiis & Manitoba Railway company, appellants
Oct. 8.
Ole C. Grinager, appellant vs. the Board o
II
county, respondent; December IL.
Catherine Crowley, as administrative of the es
tate of Edward Crowley, deceased, respondent
VS.. Frank Neulerleak, appellant: December II
Samuel Judd and Lane K. Stone, appellants
vs. Edwin +. Skidmore. Claus NJ. Dittman, An
nice G. Bartear and William L. Barteau, respond
ents; January G.
In the matter of petition for a receiver of tn
estate and property of Martin E. Dunn, unde
CHI 14S, Gen. Laws, 1881. under Insolvent Act
Caroline j. Elliott, appellant; October 8.
Lucy Hatfield, respondent, VS.. the St. Paul
Duluth railroad company, appellant: January 6
L. Z. Cole, respondent, VS.. the Wester
Union telegraph company, appellant; January
Wescott Wilkin, Sarah W. Coleman ct al, II
spondents, VS.. the City of St. Paul. the st. Par
Unien Depot Co., the st. Paul & Duluth r. r
! Co., and the st. Paul. Minneapolis 81 Manitoh
R'y Co., appellants; ia nuary Z.
The State of Minnesota, ex rel, the Minneap'
lis & Northwestern Re- .iroad Co., appellant VI
the City Council of tb city Of Minneapolis, rel
poudent; October 90.
Michael Roeller, appellant, VS.. Albert A. Anne
respondent; JanuaryS.
Michael Christian, respondent, VS.. Mary Co
bert, ct al, appellants; continued.
Cyrus C. Mccormick and Leander J. McCo
mick, co-partners. etc, appellants, vs.. 1gnatiI
Donnelly, respondent; Nov. 10.
The State OF Minnesota, ex rel, Thomas Coli
appellant, VS., Ambrose Secrest, respondent
| November 49,
| Lucy r. Barnett, respondent, VS.. The st. Al
thony Falls Water Power company, appellant
| Jan. s.
North Star Boot & Shoe company, appellan
VS.. stephen B. Loveloy, respondent; Jan. Q.
S. p. Syndef, respondent, VS.. Peter Wolfor'
appellant; Jan. Q.
The Cannon River Manufacturing association
appellant, VS.. The Board OF Commissioners
Rice county, respondent; Nov. 6.
Lewis T. Menage, respondent. vs.. L. d. Ne'
comb and A. E. Ravens, appellants; Jan. 12.
Thomas Greedy, respondent, vs.. The st. Pan
! Minneapolis 6 Manitoba Railway company, 8
! pellant; Jan. 10.