Lancaster daily intelligencer. [volume] (Lancaster, Pa.) 1864-1928, 1884-06-17
ARGUMENT COURT.
TWO isrxnEsr,so VIII. onsrrsrs
Houtine uusinsss Transacted Tho WIN OF
Gen. Ditmara ana mrs sattier 20 DO
Cpptrafet nv Reiattvn.

houi,ne uusinsss TRANSACTED Tho WIN OF
Gon. Ditmara ana mrs sattier TO DO
Contested Nv Relatives.
In the case of hnselm Bentley VS. Hugh
McCort, defendant, and George X. Reed
and Rev.A. II. Kahl. garnishees, n rule was
mado on ii. Nj. North, j. w. +. Swift and
w. L. Brown, alleged attorneys for de-
fendant, to iile their warrant Of attorney.
Tho warrants were filed and the case went
off the list.
Jacob X. Brenner, Of Bainbridge, was
granted peddler's license.
Samuel Gibson was divorced from his
wife Ellen Gibson, because sho was con.
vioted of bigamy.
In tho matter of tho exceptions to tho
report OF inspectors of q bridge between
East Donegal and Rapho townships, tho
recommendation ut the vicwers as to tho
payment Of s370 to Capt. MoMellen for
extra work, was stricken off.
Tho petition asking for the discharge Of
John +. Smith, the deiaulting tax collec-
tor now in Jail, was presented to the
court, but nothing can be done In tho mat
ter until the hearing before tho commits
sioners on Friday next,
Two Interesting win Contests.
An appeal from tho decree OF tho regis.
ter, in admitting to probate the will OF the
by Mrs. Harriet Rapelyo, n sister OF tho
deceased, on the ground that the deoedont
at the time of making tho will was not of
sound and disposing mind and memory,
| that he labored under dclusion and that
undue influence was used To procure the
will. Tho appraised amount of Con. Dit
mars property is SllS,Sj0. DR.. William
Compton is his executor. Walter NJ.
| Franklin, esq, Is counsel for Mrs, Rapelye,
who resides at Nowtown, Long Island
The court has granted an issue to try tho
validity ot tho paper.
The will Of Mrs. Louisa Sattler, OF this
city, who died rsc ,nlly, is also to be CON
tested by her SOD, j. &. Spaeth. In her
will Mrs. Sattler bequeaths s25 to j. 9.
Spaeth, and directs that tho residue Of her
estate, (estimatcd at from 100000 TO
$50, ,0O0,) be divided share aud share alike,
among her other CHILDREN, VIM Spaeth,
Louis Smith and Charlotte Smith. Her
reason for bequeathing TO J. Q. Spasth 80
small an amount Is because the testatrix
says in her will he received through his
| business arrangements with her moro than
his proportionate share OF her estate. Mr..
| Spaeth contests the will on tho grounds
that his mother a. tho time Of making it
was not of sound mind, and that undue
| influence had beou used to induce her to
|
len, esgs., are counsel for Mr.. Spleth.
suDpwns. tor divorce.
Subpmuas for divorce has beon issued in
the following cases: Leah Kreiter vs.
Charles w. Kreiter, Susan Martin vs.
Theodore Martin, Sophia Anderson vs.
Benjamin Anderson, Annie L. Cassel vs.
Abraham Cassel, Henry II. Erb VS.. Mary
Erb, Mary Stauffer vs., Henry Stautfer,
Elizabeth Frey vs.. Charles Frey, Sarah
Ebersole VS.. Levi Ebcrsole.
| suit For damages
DR.. Joseph Furniss TO day brought y
suit in the prothouotary's Office against
the Lancaster stree. railway for damages
alleged tn have been suffered in his cjec
tiou from defendants car. 1t is alleged
oD behalf OF the company that he refused
t. pay his fare.
This is tho ca5s ia which Chief Justice
McGlinn awa,dcd judgment against the
company; he subsequently found that ho
was without jurisdiction in the case.