Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1884-03-18

Ntatf ~ htn's " Ntnf'~
Stsnwooj, spp1t
state q Maine. BY complain, vs.. james
Harlow, app1t -
state Of Maine. BY complain, vs.. white
Record. spp1t
LAw pKdsi0S.
Oxf0Ep -. scr yrpiciaI Cocsi.
". pi.'t. tuly !, lsss
lahahl,sni- q nro~naeid re.r. fcs Es''s~
Inhabitants of fryCburx
10 The above named sc,loa the Clsrk Of
Court. hiss received lhs opinion and ~
scrip, from the Clerk % Law Court. Wet
ern District
The iuhsblun,s o. Browunct pray for a
review % ne Judgment recovered against
them ~ these respondents Tor pauper sup
plies furnished tothe wife Of Que Booth, bic
settlement being In nrowudelt. amt bis
wifc's before marriage, In fpcharg
The gro1nd Tor review Is The alleged d's-
covery. since The r,udliion % Judgment.
% new and rsrtincut evidence witch, 70 -
alleged. could not ~ diligcnce hav, been
discovered 90 known 10 The petitioners or
their counsel The alleged ,sidcnc, L.
that The msrrisgc between NE paper aud
her husband was procured % change her
settlement from Frycburg b Bfownnali,
by The agency sad oollu,ion Of the over
seers Of Fgehurs.
The fact alleged involvc fraud aut must
b. proved Uron = careful examination
/ of an the testimony lrsitimate ari Height
innate ~ arr satisfied that the allegations
arr not ouly noi proved, bai on the Other
hand. that they are lot true 10 fact
with ne exception ~ ne oath 20 th' 81
accrs o. ihc petition ihe only evidence
tending o. show oolla.l1n on ths part %
any ociccr % Fgcturg l. oouisioci 10
Ffc's deposition a. - conversations With
Bradley. Chairman OF Oy,rsc,rs Bot uoi
ouy even fact th,r,in connecting bin
with the marriage j. specifically sui en-
phAilcally and unqaailnedly dcnled, bot be
also tesiiaes that be ana No. know, direct
N on Indirectly. OF understand Ia any way
that The marriage Vas being procured. All
OF Fifc's testimony Ia relation b Ma. Has
uugs. Booths attorney. l. iuaimissable
bat lfnwero admlssahis. ID Il all explained
- Ear a. not l.nlst, 10 perfect CONSISTENCY
With his duty % hi. client Booth. ani Ia
uouisc a. having ans tcnioucy to ,usia.r
tac pst'tiuurr, si.rSatiou-
Moreover ihs tesilmpuy of iia.i.ass an
/ Foster bows that ths pciluln'fs counsc
To- the oflglnsi action Undertook % 80 ul
the alleged roliuslvc maffiage a. he time
! ne action was disposed OF ou iemgtr,r
And 10 by diligence thss couli have o.
covered What they have nov proved -
they i,s, ro,Alng BY want of tnig .nes.
Petition dismissed
Coats f1r Respondent
Spfosi a HOLMES. Hasuugs q Sou,
Fflnk. Counsel fpf Rcspis
| Cosussl flr rstrs.
The Commissioners have plseei very
tasty hsud rail on both sides OF the st,if'
lcaiing % the Court Room
Most Of Saturday was spent 10 hearth.
before Jaigc virgin 10 regard % The Gus
toiy ora four year Oh child % Frank p
Carpenter and wife divorced Poster
Hsrick. attorneys for Mr.. Carpenter J
:. Wright for D y
A. Bar mesting. Fhtay. u a. Hast
ing. 60. ln IN chair, arrangements wcf'
maize for proper action To- rciaiinn % th'
decsssc % Hoo D. q Hafios
Hoo. Enoch Poster will preside ~ h'
April term o. the : J. Court b. bel held Al
Bath THIS Court vii wIu BE- opsuei N.
erst day % April
Montsy mofuing case No. slo. Hiram
Hines " Elsin Howard was triet
Thls was AZ teiion on account annsHc,
% recover The value ~ grass which plaiu
ar claims was cot 90 bis land ~ defend
ant. fof two year, a. ten dollars per year
BIsbse ncrssy briisham.
Al one O'Clock the case wss len the hand
OF the lary.