Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1884-03-25

Couri ad'ournei from saturday ucor
en- Nontsy morning
CRIMINAL AFFAIRS.
Cyrus I. smith Wa committed Tor siKty
lay for non payment of nne.
E.B Holden AMI J. A. Rawsou pAi'
thrlr fnc, and costs amounting 90 sl.5 IA
each case.
Ben Siorcr ani Jas. W. Esiou proPos'
O. contest theIr ini.cimenis They ar'
boih Indicted 90 second orcuce penalty
$50 ari foar months. These cases an
ss.ignod Or Tuesday aud wednesday %
next week
rmafs
/ -. Hiram ulne. I'D. Tisin Howard
1 u.,rre A uelssy nuisham
I Th.. case was uici Monday morning
sud wAs reported To- olr iasi issue Yer
/ DICT for plaiutif for =, lt.
I ai toaa e. r.artarn ~ Nu'on y Rlcke
I ani wm 3D. o. wasnburr.
rfnsrM rFasfl
1 r.shoc HEREBY
i tn..,tsnrf ofEckrr riaInu- ilscouunuc'
| AZ fo Eirkcr
I THIS vas an actiou on pfomissofy not
given hy Milton . Kicker with W n II
. washbuin A. surety b. John &. Dearborn
I TIE roie VA for $50 With interest Al tsl
Dr. cent ani Wa dated August 8. 80
nef,nss was that Mr. Kicker The pr.ncipa
/ had paid Mr. Dearborn q % extend h'
/ time whru this note Became dae. Tht
action ON BIZ part wou'd release The sarc
las. fhc hai uot consented % The arrange
mont The Iar, f1uai for defendant
wednesday aud Thursday were devote,
toa paupcr case between The towns %
Mexico AMI p.sie'i The locke, er,r'
sas a.. follows
ru Inhabitants ~ Mexico ~ iuhahltsnt
ofuInfcIf
I roster LARA Randall
ssassv nisfrs A ticr-sy
Tbs was an aciloa % recover ffom th'
town % DlHaeli The sun ofsiii55 bs.u.
thc value % supplies furnished Que ChAs
Ia Gunes. fouud In distress In TIE town o
/ MexIco. Oc,oher ic. is.2. Chas. n. Cline
vas .n the min of ths lewiston steam Ml
. Co. a. lewiston. by fsi-e step be "a
thrown into he iargc cy Wheel 10 This mill
sud was terribly .p arci lie wAs remove.
o. thc COMPANY : boarding hogsc, ani care
. ror by thc Ciiy agthoritles. uulil. a. bis ur
gcui rsgucst be- as allowed b 10 % bis sls
ter iu Mexico This sister had marie,
Cars Huston of Mexico. where Charles
Glnes Lad of,cu stopped When oui % work
GI.uts had ben roylng Character AMI hi'
Iegai paupsr settlement ~As 10 tispute
quite a BIN hai been coutractci. for hh
support. 10 iewlsion ant The city Agthori
lies hai notlfci The towns % nitfeld an.
Mexico % the case. and that one % thes'
towns woali - called upou - pay. Are
GIncs bal been A. CLARK Huston's SOM
four weeks Huston u0tldcd the town au'
thorit.cs of Mexico that be- couli not sup
port and care f1r hi. crippled brother 10
aw Mexico promptly notified Dixhelt
that ile latter town would be called uPou
f0r tlc support 90 GIncs Thl. notice
VA repeatci a. later date, an
DHds.d replied 3D. both notices deny
Ing the psapsr Then This action VA
brought D. "a the PsuPer's settlement
P.aiutf ciAmci bis seiilcmsn. 10 D.xaeli
from h.s father. james Gllncs. and be
through his father Joseph Gilues, who
Who moved int0 Dlxfed about ne
year lsgi. The defendants under
took 10 prove drsi that james Gllnes
father % Charles n hai acquired 4 settle
ment In Mexico. a. be hal purchased {
farm To- that toNu All lived there some
time a1i was taxed there 10 lass And isje.
They next ~ up the claim that Charles n,
hal % bis own right obtAired a settle.
neat In Mexico. To sustAln this they
showed that be ani bis nother-hls father
having iici 10 ne array purchased a farm
To- Mexico. the deed oelrg dated October
81. i.ff Thls farm vAs occupied by
them for aboGt Two years bat not being
abe o. pay a mortgage. 10 was given up.
TIE mother returned % D.xheld. aud re-
ma'nsd with a daughter an her death.
From that time b this The history aud
whefeabouts o. Charles were traced with
remarkah'e miuuteuess. he worked 10 the
woods ln winter drove the river 10 spring
hayei To- summer. and learned the black.
smiths trade OF CLARK Huston Al odd
times ne WAs 10 Mexico. 10 Dixfeld, In
Rami0ri. where he married, bat separat-
"a IRON hls wife amer a short time In
New Gloucester. In Lewiston. where he
net Nth the sad misfortune which ren-
dered him a helpless cripple. IL was
claimed that through all these wanderlngs
BE- always retained 10 the house OF
Clark Huston. and that this was bis only
home that he bat Intended % make Mex
leo his home when he bought the farm
there, and that be claimed that town a.
his residence To prove this claim on his
part. the city authorities OF Lewiston and
The nurse Who cared Tor him there, were
summoned 10 testify Of his de elsrstions 10
that eject. and the fact Of bis begging 70
BE- allowed 70 rst1rn 10 bis home At Clark
Hustou's 10 Mexico Here q sharp con-
troversy arose a. 10 the admission Of bis
statements. and Judge Virgin ruled them
out very closely except 80 far s they re-
lated 10 bis act Of leaving Lewiston for
Mexico. A very sne point was drawn
here. As The man was psrslyred and could
and could no, act for himself. Judge Viz
gin ruled cat his declarations until the
time Glines wss dressed for the journey
and had been started for the cars. The
plaintiff then dlsputed the claim that
James Gnnes had ever obtained q psupsr
settlement In Mexico. and introduced the
town books OF both towns 10 show that he