The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1884-01-22
CIRCUIT COURT.
Entries Made in a Number Of Inn
portant Cases Yesterday.


meDt by default against defendants fol
1898.
Niagara Insurance Company rs. Farm.
ham & Fuller; judgment by agreement
against defendants for SIS.
Orr & Lindsey vs.. Berry Bros; interlO-
cutory Judgment by default, against de-
fendsnts, and continued.
Sarah ID. Rocklaman VS.. Adam Rockla.
man, divorce interlocutory judgment by
default against defendant and continued.
Elizabeth Jaco VS.. unknown heirs oi
Bird Hawkins; decree of specific perform.
ance.
Johanna Herman VS.. Gotlieb Herman
divorce motion for alimony argued.
The case OF Warren V. Galbreath VS..
John Newton, suit for special tax case re-
snmed from Saturday and additional evil
dence introduced. This Sc occupied the
time of the court the greater part of the
day, and not being concluded at the hour
of adjournment, was continued until this
morning.
G. A. EckerIy & Co. VS. w. T. Tucker ct
al defendant, w. t. Tucker, files separate
answer.
L.&A A. Scharff VS. w. NJ. Moore; Pm
swer Withdrawn; attachment dismissed :
judgment for plaintiffs for $257.63.
Emil Weise VS. w. NJ. Moore; answer
Withdrawn: attachment dismissed; judg-
ment for plaintiff for $3.50.
La the matter of the assignment of w. NJ.
Moore; assignee files statement and exhib-
it; notice to be given that sobjeciioRs
are M de, same BE- allowed January 18th,
1884
Louis Deutsch VS. John r. Thomas !;
| judgment by default.
Same VS. same same entry.
A. E. Stewart VS. Herman Schmitt judg-
ment by default.
State ex rel, Sedalia school district VS. H.
Y. Field; by consent respondent files return
| to writ Of mandamus.
James III. G lie VS. Richard Rush ct al :;
by consent motion for security for costs
sustained and plaintiff has leave TO file
bond ON or before first day of next term.
g. A. Eckerly g. Co. VS.. w. T. Tucker
Ell al, suit Oh note; continued at defend
ants cost and as between the defendants,
defendant, Tucker. TO pay the costs.
Wheeler & Wilson manufacturing COM
pany VS.. S. 4. Wright, suit on account
continued, with leave to supply the papers
in sixty days.
B. Levy VS. S. Y. Lewis, suit on note
motion to suppress deposition sustained
cause continued on application of plaintiff
at his cost
Eliza Fisher VS. Michael locker, dam
ages dismissed by plaintiffs.
Starr & Co. VS.. w. T. Morey, replevin;
dismissed at plaintiffs cost, and on inquiry
of damages the same are assessed at $50
against plaintiff and his sureties, aud by
consent plaintiff to retain the property
sued for and in his possession.
John Aldred VS.. j. w. Marsh, appeal
motion TO dismiss appeal sustained, and
appeal dismissed.
ID. Blocher VS.. Linton Ell al, motion to |
dismiss cause sustained and cause dis |
missed.
Meriz & Hale VS.. George Dugau suit on
account; defendant has leave to answer by |
April 1st.
Jas. S. Mclean VS.. Western Union Tel |
egraph company, appeal; dismissed on
settlement by agreement at plaintiffs cost. 1
James Kemp VS.. Thos.-J. Mason, injunc
ton motion for new trial Overruled and
defendant excerpts.
William H. Rhodes VS.. William Bryant,
suit in equity clerk ordered to place this
cause on the law docket for the next term,
at its proper place according to time when
brought.
Elias NJ Gearhart VS.. Robert III. Bolts,
suit in equity; stricken from the docket.
Frederick Hess VS.. Adam Hess, divorce
plaintiff files motion for slimony pendent
lite.
Joeeph G. Gregg ct al, ex psrte; suit in
partition; marriage of Mrs. Mollie III.
Gibson with Ed B. Gibson, and plaintiffs
have leave TO amend petition amendment
made and Ed B Gibson enters appearance
and adopts pleadin,-s and proceedings here
tofore had Joseph q Gregg, curator of
infant parties. enters appearance.
Georgia A. Thomas VS.. David A.
Thomas, divorce; defendant withdraws de-
murer and files answer.
First National Bank VS. ID. G. Paulin ct
al, attachment PLAINTIFF motion for dis
position of proceeds of attached property
taken up heard and sustained, and sheriff
ordered to psy said money into court to
the clerk thereof, who is ordered to loan
the same out ON safe security for q time
not beyond September 10th.
John Montgomery, jr., VS.. ID. G. Paulin
ct al, attachment; same entry as In the
preceding case.
The case OF Warren v. Galbreath VS.
John Newton, suit for special taxes assessed
for the improvement of Ohio street, which
udS OSCuplCu liLuc VI thC
past few days, was, after an elaborate argu
ment, given to the jury yesterday afternoon, ;
who, after due deliberatiOn, returned YER
dict for the defendant, and judgment rem
iered accordingly.
By stipulation filed. this was TO be test
case, in a number of cases involving the
same points, and therefof the same entry
will be made in the following named {
eases:
Warren v Galbreath VS.. Harriet l.. {
Sampson, James p. Leake James {
). Rogers, Jennie s. Rogers, Isaac c
Wright, Matte z. Brown, B.
Rauck, Sarah A. Prince ct al, Elizabeth #,
Evart ct al, Richard Rowe, Nellie j Farm I
nam, Mary Dean, Walter Stevens, Oren
Y. Taft and I. B. Anderson, VS.. Henry c. d
smith and George Bellss. 3
The case of Robert McCluney VS.. w. III. b