The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1884-04-26
Order of Publication.
Rralph Thayer, plaintiff,
against


Nancy Mitchell, James H Mitchell, her hus-
band, Franklin Tnayer, Thomas Mason, So
phrOnia Dennison and Smith Dennison, her
husband, stephen Mason, Eliza McVeigh
ana Patrick McNeigh, her husband, Martha
Butcher and - Butcher, her husband
Sarah Marcus and William Marcus, her
husband, Mariah ClarksOn and -- Clark
son, her husband. Mariah Browning and
John l.. Browning, her husband, Sophronia
Grimes, stephen Thayer, Eliza Dixon Helen
Ashby and William w. Ashby, her hus-
band, defendants.
No. BOG Equity. In the Circuit Court for Gar
rett County.
The object of this Bill is to procure decree
for the sale of the real estate of which the late
Martha Thayer died, seized and possessed
and have the proceeds of such sale distributed
among the heirs at law of the said Martha
Thayer, according to their respective inter
ests.
The Bill states that the said Marth Thayer
was in her lifetime seized and possessed Of a
tract of land lying in the Town of Oakland,
Garrett county, Maryland, containing five
acres, that being so seized and possessed of
said land, she departed this life intestate in
the month of December, A. ID. 1881 leaving
the following children and heirs at law, to-
law. Ralph Thayer, franklin Thayer, and
stephen Vhayer, her sons, ana the following
daughters, to-wlt: Nancy, whointermarried
with James II. Mitchell, Jane, who inter-
married with William Mason, Marian, who
intermarried with John i. Browning, Sophro-
mia, vine intermarred with Thomas Grimes
Eliza. who intermarried with James Dixon,
and Helen, who intermarried with William
w. AShby.
The BIZ further states that since the death
of the said Martha Thayer, Thomas Grimes,
husband OF the aforesaid Sophronia Grimes,
James Dixon husband of the aforesaid Eliza
Dixon. have died, leaving their said wives
surviving them.
The Bill further states that since the death
of the said Martha Thayer the said Jane Ma
son and william Mason, her husband de-
parted this life, said Jane dying interstate,
leaving the following children and heirs at
law: Thomas Mason and stephen Mason,
| their sons and the following daughters, to-
wit: Sophronia, whointermarried with Smith
| DennisOn Eliza, who lntermarried with Pat
rick McVeigh, Martha, who internsarried
| with - Butcher, Sarah. who intermarried
With William Marcus, and Marian, who in
| termarred with - Clarkson.
| The Bill further states that all Of the said
! children and grandchildren of the said Mar
| tina Thayer are over twenty one years of age.
| The Bill further states that said real estate
| is not susceptible OF division among the par
| ties entitled thereto, and prays for a sale of
said real estate, and distribution OF the pro-
ceeds under the order ofthe court The Bill
| further states that Nancy Mitchell and James
| II. Mitchell her husband, Franklin Thayer.
| Thomas Mason, Sophronia Dennison and
| Smith Dennison, her husband, stephen Ma
son, Eliza McVeigh and Patrick McVeleh, her
husband Martha Butcher and - Butcher,
her husband, Sarah Marcus and William Mar
Gus, her husband. Mariah Clarkson and -
Clarkson, her husband, stephen Thayer and
| Eliza Dixon are nOn-reSidents.
The Bill prays for the usual process, and
also for an order of publication against the
aforesaid non resident defendants.
II is therefore ordered by the Court this 18th
day of April, A. d. 1884, that the plaintffcauSe
n copy ofthis order together with the object
and substance of the Bill to be inserted in
some newspaper published in Garrett county,
once week for four successive weeks before
the 25th day Of May. A. d. 1884, giving notice
to the said Nancy Mitchell and James II.
Mitchell Franklin Thayer, Thomas Mason,
Sophrona Dennison, smith Dennlson. ste
phen Mason Eliza McVeigh and Patrick Nc
Weigh, Martha Butcher and - Butcher
t her husband Sarah Marcus and William
Marcus, Mariah Clarkson and - Carkson,
her husband stephen Thayer and Eliza Dix
on, and warning them to appear in this Court
in person or by solicitor on or before the LIST
Monday of September, A. d. 1854. 10 show
J cause, ifany they have, why decree should
not pass as prayed
w. II. TOWER,
Clerk Circuit Court for Garrett county,
True oopy--Test:
1894 W. II, TOWER, Clerk.