Daily Los Angeles herald., 1884-03-02

l have had no communication on the
subject with Mr.. Cuddy sincs the morn.
ing after the adjournment Of the Grand
Jury; my relations with him have been
friendly; he then told me that an indict-
ment had been found and he believed it
was against me. / never vent to see
him after that time nor did he come to
see me. Iknow of no reason why did
not go to see Cuddy, except that l
thought 1t would have been kindness for
him TO have come to see me. This closed
the cross s-examination Of this witness.
J. A. Willing, ex-police officer, was
the next witness sworn. He did not
know anything about the Sullivan affair,
and after flew questions by the District
Attorney, was dismissed from the stand,
j. A. Crawford sworn-Am law stu
dent in the law Office of Del Valle 4
De Puy; was there at time the Grand
Jury was in session.; remember distinct
ly that T. j. Cuddy came into the office
on Saturday Of that week; he called Mr.
De Puy out; I remember he was there
one day before during that week; he
and Judge De Puy bad conversation in
the front Office, which lasted about 10
minutes; did not hear the conyersa-
tion.
Cross. examined De Puy called
my attention to the fact Of these visits
by Cuddy day or two after tho Grand
Jury adjourned. He simply asked me II
! remembered that Chief Cuddy had
been at the Office on the occasions men.
toned. / asked no questions. When
Cuddy was in the front room on the oc.
casion referred to, was reading the
Porcupine in the back room, and when
Judge De Puy returned 1 remarked that
the Porcupine was very heavy on the
Chief.
To Justice Ling = Don't remember
having seen Chief Cuddy at the office
before the times already stated.
Judge Morgan recalled-I remember
having been notified to appear before
the Grand Jury. / was in the Police
Office one day talking to Cuddy, when
Mr.. De Puy came in. immediately
left the Office. Tho first time heard
that Cuddy was mixed up with the mat
ter was the next week. when l was
told by you (the District Attorney; l
thought the matter was entirely between
myself and De Puy.
Judge Adams recalled--When / was
testifying yesterday, in regard to the
dismissal of the case against Sullivan,
omitted to remember that there was o
slight alteration between myself and
Sullivan, the defendant. On Icing dis
charged, be imme lately became very
violent, and stated in effect that the
whole city government-police, District
Attorney and everybody else pack
Of thieves, and he would report the matter
to the Republican State Central Com
mittee. Ifelt naturally indignant at his
copduct, and told him that a man
charged with filthy crime such as he
had been ought to hide his head in very
shame.
John Miner sworn: / am Secretary
Of the Farmers and Merchants Bank;
have held that position for about six
years; know T. J. De Puy; remember
transacting SOME business with him Oc.
tober IL, 1882; he left bank book and
draft for $500 on Hibernia Bank, San
Francisco. for collection; en- October ID,
1882, credited Mr.. DePuy wi b the 5000
received from Hibernia Bank, which he
drew out October l6, less one dollar and
fifty cents expenses for kilograms and
express charges. making the sum of
Sl98.50.
Checks identified and put in as evil
dence.
Stephen NJ. White sworn: Reference
has been aade that l communicated to
Mr.. DePuy the danger there was Of an
Indictment being found against him. I
wish to state that on one occasion, after
. conversation with me, he stated that
he was going over to Cuddy's Office, and
l watched him and saw that he went in
that direction, but did not see him go
into the Office. / afterwards saw him
come back from that directionis 1t was
then he told me he had no statement to
make; that he had friends on the jury,
and he did not think an indictment
wonl be found.
No REORGANIZATION.
This closed the casefor the prosecution.
Adjourned until $50 o'clock Monday
morning.