Little Falls transcript. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1876-1894, 1884-01-11
IlIstrI oIirr.

Edlsfrict puft IS 10 NJ prrisf,ia sCnNiiiY.s
Where Tic cases have been liisp,sed 81
the result .iis give
eoaTIsuED cnI ,lIsAI. scAsra .s#
tate of Minnesota Ohm
Sloan and John Mel CARLY COUNTY, Il:
torneY Warrington for pIaintif q, Oscar
Tay lof for efentl,,,i. Separate irial
granted s IL disella rged ]; M &c arthy
tried and jury j sag sed continued
till next term j ,3
No. 2. State of finnesota vs. IA. n
Lewis. County attorney for plain If
and E 81 Farnham for defendant; de.
fsndan. tried and acquitted n . 81 s:.= 81
CONTINUED CIVIL CASES. 5-=.
No. 8. Robert Slatson W George
Geissel Els Smith for plaintiff and A
F storey for defendant; continued.
No, 4. James G Flynn vs. Julian lie
mienx. A F Storey for rlaintiT and &
w Collins for defendent; ordered TO be
referred. ~ s:E@s,,. :l'13.ss5 u
No. s, Michel Wick VS. Simon Blair.
a F Storey for defendant, and.A j
Clark and Oscar Taylor for defendant;
continued, ..z.....s >>t Il e .ss=z...
No.6. !. George .Geissel VS. Robert
stuisoa. AT Storey for plaintiff, and
.ESSnith for defendant; continued.
&. No y Joseph Doncette vs. N PR R
co. a r Storey for plaintiff, and sesrle,
Searle g. Tolmans for defendant; contin-
ued. NJ %, ;. ~ MI ~ ~. , $55r.s. . 81,
Nos: j D Lachance vs. Anna Cole.
4 F Storey for pl,ff, 'Searle, s.ssarle g
Tolman for 'def't: to be referred.
No. 8. James +. Stevenson e Co vs.
Berg g Sons. Searle, Searle s. Tolman
for pl'tf, and A F Storey for dcf't; yer.
dict for plaintiff; for $l51 so end owner.
ship and possession Of the property for
which the notes. We're given not hereto.
fore taken by pl'f under foreclosure OF
mortgage. ">..:=@,=
No. 10. Nathan Herrick vs. William
Butler. Savage s. Woodman for pIH,,
and SearIe, Searle & To,mar for def't; to
be referred. ~ ~.'. =.
F No. II. Henry Sharon vs. Pe,ey LIE.
may and Peter Medved. E S Smith fol
pl'f, and AT Storey for dert; 10 be re.
ferred. - :> ~:
- APPEAL CASES. 49,. -
No. IL. Marcus>K obe vs. G A futile.
e s Smith for pl'ff, AID Taylor s. Tay.
lor for :def'!; verdict for pl'H .ror $S4.39
No. Is. 4 Francis Vasaly vs' Leon
; Houde g N Richardson. A T Storey
Taylors& Taylor for plff, and CD Kerr
and J r Bennett, Jr, for def. 80
I No. II. Marcus Kobss VS. Mp RR
Go. E Ssmith for p1'tf. and G. S Fern.
aid for def verdict for plaintiff Tor ST.
The case will be appealed to the supreme
court. a.. 49,.
No, Is. NV Bouck vs. C A. futile. E
H Farnham for prf, and Ia, lor & Tay-
Tor for delft; ~ :%5.@ =.
No. Is. ,Chas Backer VS. Henry B Nor
rison. B F Hartshorn for pl'ff, and e
H Farnham for delft; verdict for pl'f.
No. II. Chas Sprande vs. Newbery
Briggs f II Farpham for pl'f, and A
F Storey for def't. r.. -.
No. 10. Georgestillwcll vs. N P r r
Go. AT Storey for :;ol'H, aid W P
Clough for def't
Nos 10, 20 and 81 are cases of ] Fl
Rhodes vs. n T r r Co. A r Storey for
'plf, and W P Clough def't; itirst two
submitted 20 the court on the testimony
produced at the trial in the justice cour1.
In last case appeal dismissed and judg.
ment sustained.
No, q. Paul Hosch VS. Marke Kobe.
NEW CIVIL CASES
No. %. Nathan Herrick VS. John
Curaie. savage s. Woodman for pl'ff,
and \ F Storey for: deft; to be referred.
No. "a. Nathan >Herrick VS. o "A
Churchill ct ux. Savage & Woodman,
pl'f, and Taylor 4 Taylor for def't.
No: Is. Nathan Herrick vs. Louis
Vasa]y. Savage s. Woodman for pl'tf,,
A F Storey far def't; to be referred.
). No. 26. Nathan Herrick vs.Iona'ha
Taylor etiux. Savage & Woodman for
pl'f, and A F StoreyAfor 'def't. -.
No.27. Nathan Herrick vs. Mary Am
norman. Savage & Woodman for vplf.
and sear]e, searlc & Tolman for def. j.
No. 2S. 'Warder, Bushnell & Gless-
ner VS. George Lafond. = A r Storey for
ppf, AM. E II Farnhan for def.
No. %. N P Clark and Clara c Ne
.Clure executors of the estate Of Thos G
Mcclure VS. Lson Houde, Searle, Searie
& 'Tolman for .pl'ff and A F Storey for
deft. ...=- -. :
No. 30. John Demars vs. Supervisors
of Town Of Ripley. E H Farnham for
pl'ff, and A F Storey for def't. /. e H.. i. -
W o. Auna " asn pusu w = fahk ~
Trimbar. c D. Kerr and N Richardson
or pPf, and McKelvy s., Brockhart; I:
continued. IS. zss,5 - p. -. 5s.,s:
!. / No. 80. Marcus Kobe vs Henry Rasi
cot 3 s Smith for =prt, and Taylor &
Taylor for deft continued. e !, 3 -. .=@ h
y. No So. DC y Taylor Vs. C,nraa
schnrtz. Taylor q Taylor for pl'ff, and.
"a F Stnrey for delft. ( s.@z. 5.'s y. #@:$= a
No.34. Mary Gross VS. Henry Rasi I.
cot E s Smith q F r Farnham f +
pll' #, and Taylor q Taylor for,def't; CON
tinued. " SO z.. 81 /, is 81 1. ! !. z.. !: 55| 4
No.55 James Chapman vs. N P r r
To. Taylor & Taylor for pl 4, and w 2.