The San Antonio light. (San Antonio, Tex.) 1883-1886, 1884-09-24

certainty Is no law III tne tnltcu othies
against woman's Rights party, and If
Mrs. Lockwood has the will TO accept
the honor she should receive fair treat
ment
TuE Democrats in New York are not
at all encouraged by the attitude re-
Gently assumed by Tammany respect
ing Cleveland, and almost concede the
state to Blaine. The Republican defec-
ton has been greatly magnifed by the
Democrats in order to produce an effect
In other States, but the truth is leaking
out.
WHY do not the Democrats haul Sena-
tors Coke and Maxey over the Goals for
voting TO confirm MIR. Blaine as Secre-
tary of the State, In March, 1881? The
Mulligan letters had then been five
years before the country. II Coke and
Maxey were not to blame for voting to
make him Secretary Of State, the Repub-
licans need feel no hesitation In voting
for him for President.
Why should the State University fund
be used in paying the expenses Of the
Law department? We need mechanics
far more than lawyers. The people
should make the stoppage OF this waste
Of the University fund in the payment
=, sn,or;os 40 iov nrosessors n onestion
In ,ho oIoc,ion nj members of tbe Leeis-
lature. Workingmen, farmers and mer-
ohonts shopId brand This abuse with
,l,oir condemnation Jo,vvers are en-
,ilod IN moro nrivilepes Than farmers
and mechanics
- ,n
l1h ring go' III ''S WIN 'oi9 80!
NJ the Denocr"''u pi''l"i'es' NV 'n'
NOMINATIONS are ui hAe"' "o
can wore coh,rois 'he i,einoo'"''u p"i'
oil beNar' ana 'hree UT iour i'e'' i"i ."o
MeNicuns' p"' sum 'neie Nv l"e
ABOUT H. say tue r'hgi'es' mug iu'o
VIII rum any p"i'! a"u "''9 'C"'i'
"nere 'he peoPie SUNNI W ITO YoNe INV
wear us iliu"Hie' III ai'nos' every oou"'y
In ieNas lne Dehocr",'c party Is ~" ny
tired of such state of things.
-
bN-MAhShNl i'"'S' vi i'o''''"""' was
ieoeh'iy i"'ei ''o~'u i'pooi
.nc 'nu,an"po,'s 'p"i, ', Us " ~, 'n' po," .
'o"i o"'ioon i" , n,v"'',a"" 'nlo 49,
"ne,' ne s'''u "o n.p ~ ,o'',", "i'
'""S,"s IS, :. -. .,O, ~, ..'
a''u u, w" y, '"' az 10 80,
noi'oe' i'ep'D,'0"" "a1Vi"! y" .,
-''oVV III '"e '''"''' """ '""'
" "''e ieP,eso''"''oi VI Wv 80 w..
po"'u'' ,"oio 70 s'Vs "''ui
We WIN o",i' W, ''",o' io'oioi ,
'"e e.vo''v" vC"ru9 ~ -
.No''s''o'y VI o,,"'' ~
''o" ITO" 90, Dee" ""o' . c, ~
'"''' nv ~ ~
iepi,'' '',' y, ~. D"9''9 80.
"ie o"o" ''s nuo" .o"o' - ~, ~,
'''"o' anu '"'' "i' W. '"'
ans ne. "io "v"' w Ooi.e'-"''
n.a,''o anu logan io'.o''o" '''o' """,
WV" ia', oeo',V"' 'n'io =, w .o"o'
'"'' ''o"'''"" w 81 -.oP"'"''
MuLiIGAS stands before the country as
a convicted liar and base slanderer.
In 1876 he swore that Blaine obtained
the letters written by him to Fisher
from him (Mulliganl by fraud and force
and DESTROYED or suppressed those most
criminatory, vet Fisher now furnishes
the press with the original letters. This
convicts Mulligan of perjury and foul
SANDER, and really looks as though he
had attempted in 1876 TO blackmail
ni"ine' ! no ie''ele no" p'on'ueu W
'he pourooh press were ieau anu yum
hehteu upon ny Mr. Di"ihe oeiore Tue
ih'es.is"''hs oon''ii'''ee, anu "nie 'ue9
may sho" some want Vi ueiic"e!' 'heS
Iali 10 CONVICT Mr. piaihe Vi corruption,
Inc ruiinB 'huue U" 'ne oui'"ii "'ienu'
nieh' never mas oeeh c"iieu III question
IL was rlgh' anu proper III tsei'' "hue'
'ie o'io"ihs'anoes. mr. n'a'he ie''ei
snow 'na' "nel 'his iui'ns was i'"''
ny MN ne hhu ho acquain'anoe' oonneo
-,
uisPio'os 'ho iu'i'S "" VI" ""i"'
amendment. There was no corruption