Lancaster daily intelligencer. [volume] (Lancaster, Pa.) 1864-1928, 1884-03-26
UuUnr eKOCrrpISus
urrcrt Husiu.-s Transacted To-day.
,urt met at 10 o'clock this morning for

Current Husiu.-s rran-sctcd To-day.
Court met at 10 O'Clock this morning for
the transaction OF current business.
In the matter of the division into two or
more election districts, exceptions were
iicd to the report ui viewers. by an
agreement ui cOunsCl tho court ordered
the exceptions tn 10 sustained and report
set aside
jacob X. look, OF East LlmpCtcr, was
appointed u committee on Henry SushOn,
lunatic, now in the county hospital.
"A charter was granted to the ltOustdgs
Baseball association.
The following licences were transferred
Eating house of John SohocnbcIgcr, Sec
ond ward, to Henry Rohrcr tavern of
John Dssiuger, of Marietta, tO Isaac liis
singer tavern of John a. Schuh, Ninth
ward, Lancaster, to Jacob NJ Schoetz !;
tavern from Elias Schecta, of Elizabeth
township, 20 Henry Hartman eating
house of Henry Shillcr, of Washington
borough, to Abraham llarncr tavern of
Isaac Brubakcr, Of Raphc, to l.. B.
Boyd tavern ot Vim. X. Baker of Elz
abethtown, to Daniel Miller.
uur Amiauie judges innarmonious-Fo
once
The intcrmiuahlC Ephrata church case,
which has diYided not only tho venerable
court of Lancaster county, for some years
past, was again before that jurisdiction
this morning in Que OF It's many phases.
Attor recent decree by Judge Living
! ston, ia favor of tho Maiden, Xer.
fuss aud kOugmachcr party---frOm
which decree Judge Patterson had
disscntcd-cUsts wcrr taxed by tho
winners aud to this taxation the other side,
the NOldc, 'plngler, and Maiden faction,
took exceptions, which came up for argu
mont this morning. The party favored by
| Judge Livingston COntcndcd that the
taxation was in accordance with the do.
cree, while Judge pdtteTsou's side Of the
controversy insisted that in view of the
fact that ho had dlssoutCd there was no
| decree.
In tho course oi the argument and dis
cusslOu between court and counsel, Judge
Patterson expressed his willingness to call
in another judgc--as provided by act Of
assembly and as suggested by the opinion
OF the supreme court IN this case to deCGo o
tho matter in dispute Judge Livingston
said there WAS no occasion for this Judge
| Patterson said there was no decree, he
had been given the case to consider and
| the opinion To write, aud It judge Living
| stOu wOuli withdraw his dissent from his
| order the case would go to tho supreme
| court. Judge Livingston suggested that
| Judge Patterson withdraw his dissent
| from his (Judge LViugston's) decree.
After some further discussion and Judi.
cial sparrtng the controversy was renewed
| just before the adjournment OF court, when
| Judge Patterson announced that he had
an opinion lac wanted To read.
Judge Livingston objected, as hc said
| there was nothing before the court.
Judge Patterson said this was tue time
| Judge Livingston said 81 don't know
that it is. There is nothing to file an
| opinion on To get before the people aud
into the papers"
All tho lawyers in chorus 1T will all
| get into the papers"
Judge Patterson IL WAS only going
TO express my willingness to have another
judge called iu."
Judge Livingston THAT would have
come properly when | filed my last de.
| cree"
In the course of further discussion
Judge Livingston said that if Judge Pat
tersOn filed au opinion that might necessi-
tate the writing of another opinion, stating
the record truly aud giving all the facts II
the case.
| Judge Patterson said that he was no
afraid TO have all tho facts brought out.
Mr. North suggested that nobody in til,
case was afrdil.