Little Falls transcript. [volume] (Little Falls, Morrison County, Minn.) 1876-1894, 1884-07-11
Court iale n(islr

lap earing on the ealen dar for he
present term Of district court. ext
week Is the earl est date at 2iwhic:l Ne MI,
can publish what dispo sition vas made
of then. Several have bee settled, d
few referred 81 cont nned !, and some
of thens triad 81.
<,RIlfI At
State Of M,Dneso u, John Sloan
and John ne t,satthy; Il ! NJ
Worthington county attorney l,seall
Taylor for def ssS'
CIVIL cATsEElss. ssa.s B
Robert Stutson, u. do Geisel,i issue ii
fact, 3 s. Smith for pr f, "a r Story fol
|deft, =s',=515 ID 3
james g FlyDn, VS.. Julian Iemieux
issue OF Fact, a b Story for pltf, Searle
searles& Tolmaf for deft.
+. Michsl lex, vs. Simon Blair, issue ST
INV ard fact, a r Storey for pin, IA j
|slaaaake and O Taylor for def't i.
George geissel, vs.. Robert stutson,
issue Of law and fact a: + stogey fol
plR p s Smith for delft I'M III II
/ . p Lachance, VS.. Anna Cole, issue ii
fact, 4 Fsstory for pl 6, searle, searle &
Tolman for eef't. u !
Nathan Herrick vs. 4 Wn Butler; Issue
Of fact, Sewage y Wo odma III for plffs,
ISearle, Searle s. Tolman FOR def't. D.
Nathan Herrick, VS. John Cnrrie, issue
Of fact. Savage g Woodman, for pl' f, A
F Storey for delft. =5 y. .. I
Nathan Herrick, VS. / Francis Vasaly,
issue Of fact, Savage y w goldman for
pl'f, A + Storey for sdef't. 81 .ss 5@! \
Nathan Herrick vs Jonathan Taylor
and Marion II Taylor. Savage 4 Wood.
mrn for pl'H, a + Storey for deft. Il :.
Anna Washbusb, vs. Frank o 'I'relnba,
Issue Of fact, G p Kerr and N. Rishard.
| son for pl'ff, McKelyy s. Brackhart for
delft j i. r. y Fl.
Marcus Kobe, VS. Henry Rasicot, issue
] Of fact, 3 IS Smith and E d Farnham
for plf, Taylor & Taylor for det't, 81
b: Mary Gross, vs. Henry Raiscot, issue
Of fact, E 8 Smith and e Fl Farnhan for
pl'f. Taylor . Taylor for dart, y. .s.. =
- Wentworth Hayden, ct al. vs. Chas.
Keith ard H B Crowley, issue of law,
Benton & Roberts for pl't1f, Chas D, Kerr
for delft. .,5 H .5G5S ": .]:s s* .ss u
p Ed Yignaisy, VS. Wm Batters, ISSUE; Of
fact, 3 H Farnham, for pl'tf, "A F Storey
for def'l. .s.. b + + #. + sss &z>
"jo NEW CIVIL CAUSES.
Sylvester Kipp and Annie Kipp, VS.
Marcus Kobe, issue Of fact, Taylor &
Taylor for pl,f, McKelyy & Brackart for
def't. T.. 'sy g@;ss +.
Austin Norbin, vs. Charles Berry, issue
Of law, Searle, Searle & Tolman for pl'tf,
E H Morse for def't. :. y %.yz5s !. . I'LL
In the matter of the assignment Of
Henry Won Der Haar, bankrupt, John
stumpf, assignee, issue Of law, ssarle
searle & Tolan attorneys for assignee.
In the matter Of the assignment of
John w Elsie, bankrupt, Nick Keep
pers, assignee, Searle, Searle & Tolm an
attorneys and assignee. .s.. (. 81. b
J O. HerYieux. vs. Joseph Doucett. issue
Of fact, A F Storey for pl'ff E H Farm
ham for def't. 49, I'D ..s.5s @35ss..
John A McMillin q Co., vs. Geo W
Calkins, Samuel st. Pierre and Abram
St Pierae, issue of fact, McKelYy &
Brachart for plf, B F Hartshorn for
defot. i. - :,
Sandwich Manufacturing Co., VS. NJ.
Lafond y Co. issue of fact, A F Story
for pl'f, Theo Rruner for deft. @
Sandwich Manufacturing Go. VS. Flynn
Paine Is Go. Issue of fact, AT Storey
for pl'ff, Theo Bruner for def't. . IT,.
I Little Falls Lumber Co. VS. Abby A.
Clyde, issue offacts, A F Storey for pl'ff,
B Fl Farnham for def't. ,.gy.. - z#-r$g$
Leon Houde, IS, Ashley g !: Morrill,,
issue Of fact, A F Storey for pl'f, g II
| Farnham for delft. n III Il .4z..5; n
E Anne & Hayes VISA j Sawyer, issue
of fact, Thomas G Eaton for pptf, W. W,
Billson for def't. i. 4 .sl.A Il tts4|
Nellie 3 Gray VS. George Gray, Issue
OF fact, Taylor d Taylor for def't. &y==
81 Phillip Gross vs. McCanley & Rasicot,
issue Of law and fact, Z s Smith forppff,
Taylor y Taylor for def't n
&. Phillip Gross, VS. Samuel McCaaley
issue Of law and fact, 3 Smith for plAs
Taylor y Taylor for deft.
3 D Hamilton, vs.. Anton Theisse, ct
81: issue Of law and fact, Tay ler q Tay-
lor for pl' 81, Nc Kelyy 4 Brachart for
deft. ! d. '. 3.
William McC une, rs G T Geer, issue
Of fact, p q Calhoun for pl'ffE, raylo. y
Taylor for def l. rs IL ;#3
Leo Brick, rs j r Steele, issue Of law.
and fact, = 8 Smith for pl e, Taylor =
Taylor forsdef'
l*332 Ac'1 DIlGhf5sS: II DtEelei lSSH6 OH
and fact, 3 s Smith for pl'fi; Taylor II
|traylof.for def
Coleman Bid han, vs. Amend seifest,
issue of fact, Searle, Seattle u Tolman
for pl' e, Taylor 8 Taylor for def't
Dteman, Star 81 Everett, rs Louis
asaly, issue Of fact = r Storey for pl'ffr,
= 81 Farhhan for def o. 55S III 81
Hafsshorn g Son ms John a McMi1len
aid, John i HcM illin, issue Of fact, B +
Hartslorn for RI f, Nc KeIvy q Brac.
hart fof DIFF.
prHAt CAusEs
John IS Rhodes, .vs Northern Pacific
[ Railrosd issue sflaw. "A 3 Storey for