Ellsworth American. [volume] (Ellsworth, Me.) 1855-current, 1884-04-24
DEFENSE. Payment.


dun you for the bill, then you find the receipt,
Is you say. and then lose IT, You must add
another bunder. either that what YOU took for
receipt. was the receipt for another bill. or
what you.call u receipt did not have a signature
to 1t. The jury Of II were unable TO agree and
We're evenly divided rs that number can be-
Judge Peters said he should not allow the
Jurors to be discharged from the case without
further effort al an agreement. We're he not
satisfied that the lost paper could be found
The paper he said has not been destroyed, il /,
in existence. it can be found. and when found
II will throw such light upon the case a. the
jury ought TO have before being called upon to
decide it,
Wiswell for Pin. Hamlin FOR Def.
Adjourned over fast day.
Friday, April IL.
orrin CHM v. Arthur g. Gilley.
Trespass 10 settle line between the farm Of
these parties who live In Orland. II Il agreed
that the western boundary Of both farms is the
Eastern River, so-called and that the proper
dividing line commences st well known pine
tree on the eastern bank Of that river aud cx-
tends in nearly a southeastern direction. about
40 rod~ till II strikes "a range line n right
angles. No question j. made about the first
30 roll from the pine tree At the cud 81 which
II i agreed. and the most ancient plan show,
that there l. right angular turn nr jog in
southwc~torlt direction. whether 81 1 nr ;
rols l. the whole question in thi, case. ~ the
end IF the jog the line turn, again nt right
angles and continues to the range Way 200 rod
in the same direction A. the first 2ln rods. the
range way making a slight angle ut H. point Of
contact The plaintiff owns north OF this
line and " ants this jog rods. III. IF, ndani
own, South aud wants Il 1 rod. 80 that the
contention j. concerning strip 2n0 rod- long.
and one rod wide. an acro aud quart. TN nth.
one witness thinks about $40. The plaintiff
deed callc, for ftc rods iog AMI the defendants
earliest deed !, bounded 10y the plaintiff. The
defendant against thu deed claims line fence,
commencing ~ rnd~ ing, thu two cnds ~
which j. lop fence supported hy defendant
and the middle stump fence supported ny
The plaintiff side. rhi- fence rum till il
strikes wet meadow and then turns south
across defendants lnt 70 Keep hi cattle III.
Stake on the meadow continuing thu linz IN
IA, rang, NAY. No question l. usd, that III,
''''' f'7 7''' ''''' 49, ''' ''' - h'4-i'f"
>ay. ~, ~ or very near thr lin, p, fhc ~
PENDANT claims II.
II NNTIrr.-My DID rail- for nv rudJ"Z.
YOUR decd !, bounded BY me. In - short a
distance, | csn only account f'r lour -rAutnr,
making lop fence line on the four rnl-. IN
III" ground that they meant I" steal roll -
NY land. AMI ihai j. thin- wy never ant wv
submit m.
brtTNrN>T. J csu arrruu' f"r q another
WAY. Perhaps thn ir~i hnlf from pinr irrt. NJ
bir,h corner wa- ton f,r south, hy . rud. 1nl
I'll. r'>t VA carried north w compensation.
n auy ratr Your -rauf"r- Not 'h,r ..umr
'.mer on thr same lin". Neither II a. An.w
.r-t Nh, NJ, hn- Na. mal, th,r,. rr#.hghr
4 wa. j rpnprrmi,e iur aui ought uat rfrr
- ,,ar- ID D.. disturbed. A,t, m, =. 'iu.
tlic !and. II intended " W. thut la,r ti.I.
hN ii--+lin. whrh j. m .n"I rs ai'I, n.
-riluro
rfuNtuf rhc f,u.. Y rr-oA VI '|n. ni
should n. straight.
pfrr>r,>T- Not mum rn,hed. ". -t.... .i,t
a> -n,h nr. rau Ny. mHlr / ., ur. -N..t
n. uilA'n- il straight nu n. 8 r-l- fa-.-.
,rrisT. IN ~. I,oini thc ava " i-,,. uu-
i,r which tlr plaintiff claims j. Oh, d.ti-..fl-
ate d.,-i =, far i, record =, VI, a,i. .lli.f
Th,r, II ~ ,.a-hin. " H.-i- ruyr. y ".
rlA>hin- = tn Where M, original Iu. vf-.
Deed ,ill, f,r 4 w y /, birch CORNER 4" .uI
l.,..lar ,.ru.r ~ I,yyar VIM IN .y-. \ud--
pu.r q. ~ uhrr. \ was IN. question 4.
Nh.r, ua. re,,Ia-. corner IN. ku,,, 4 L.r,
Nh, rr,lir Ma. Ii would control ,,h.,h.r3 VI b
nri nr & rods. /: i, not M .r,. now. L.. u'a,.
govern, , ou .tn iinIw h.rrt, v... lh. tlIiu-
til a, Their. Il h. \, .leura ur.h, monument
rh.. ,l,f,n,lan, .t,. The Fence. I. ,,iI,n,,. w
whrrc thr corner wv. thai, l..r,,r ,,iienr.
than th, ,l,.tanro controlling ia. that tn. fauc,
from III, roL TO-. i ih- d,--crudtnt ~ NJ.
Inv. thc child " thr sranicfiId " ihe linr
+, tn peak -hnwiu- vh.r, twas. Nrrli.i
frr Nv plaintiff. ~ damage. rh, 4, i ,-t.,
w nm rn,r> Motion w -.r t-rt verdict l-
a..in.t evidence.
Fellow. III Pm
Cunningham. Wi,v IIvrA hi.n l.r Il..f.
~.fur,il, \rril H..
\,nY 4. W...r,rA- I..inir., Us-l-Atn.
Nancy 4. Wooster w.. ,',ru- Tm.r..
Tu.,i.,. iri,,l ,n-rtb,r.
R,n,.,tn,. L.mlr, wv hnr-.. named I.....
rrp,,r ur rr,,ra., ,, Em,- f.- ,,f.
,arria-e ana tow
TN. plaintiu j. M, widow III J,-.lrsuI
Wooster Of Uau.urk Lmrr, f. Administrator
ar.I I.ruir4 /. d.u.ht.r.f, l..,l...It. I, f.ri..-
MIN, ANN pur,.ha~.,i from administrators Thr
parties in 10th actions claim TIN. rhr,u.l, w..
.,4.,I Thr plaintiff rlaim. lt ..r I'M, ..,.-
ceased I'M about ~iouno ~ hi personal t.rn..r-
Il. h,..d.. .nrn..what H., r,.ii estate. Th, aI-
miui.ir.tor declined M VIVA IN rrainrih'- .n
nf these ..ift>. h.nr,. th:, suit.
TIL. Is il.n.c Wa abundant that TN, d,,.....-
IA r,p..It.,Ily In thc rr,.,,nr. ~ tuan, /. I'M
ur,,r, declared rh,. horse ami carriage. va-
Nmr,.. Thr counsel III III. ,l,f.it-. N. WHY
mitt.,l and perhaps NJ intended a, -.i,, tl,,Y
~ her but cont, i,l,i that an intention L. .i,,.
4 promise ~ INV. wa nor .ift. WIN, / ,l.ln-
.r, wa, necessary 10 complete. tn. Gift. TN.
L.f,ud.nt. iutr,rlu.,,l M ..yid.If., .,pI WV.
rli.f .tr,. submitted IL Nv. iur, NM. .,ipu
~ delivery.
InI-El-Ih.r,. must b.. Al actual a,li,,r,
rh, nudge gave Illustration 81 formal deliver,
and said thrrr may be actual delivery. n fiar
amount, 10 m actual deliver, H. coti,YI.u-