Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1884-10-25

before public opinion Gas nodded In Il,
fsvoF, ana at time WHEN it vas tread
ing &c oanRero01 9reund 70 say suehI
.ass tne nashinstions Of sush . -
| We mast not forRss NE men ~
c1&mptoued our esnss from the Start
Who fought % nobiy as toe meeeinc,
neld las epg1nQ, and Who % nobIy
fought for oar oAuss ID tke late Rsii.
road kepubIicxn Convsntiou.
| SaoohA Lewis 4nd Kinnesr stand to-
/ Gay entitled 70 the eOts Of every frus
torfettuee man fer tks eood theg hav.
already done, - well q for the cood
sncy can 10, and for the good deeds ~
nave every reason 70 expeok from tl,esu
We ell know who they are; ve know
tnem 20 be men Of ability, Who could
and would do ~ good ssrvioe in the
IeRssisture II elected; and We know
tnem 70 b soand On the best interests
o. she people, and On every issus il
vowed u this oampsian. 10 vote
AGAINST these fn~n would BE- IL vote
aRninst forfeiture.
NOV, let ~ all b consistent. Deuo-
craes ssk kspabiioaus 70 lag asids party
sesuee and vote for Voorhees, and for
reiscre may we not. then, oconpyiuQ
neutral ground. ask DsnScrats Is Iav
as1de party issues and vote for those
men Who have championed the caune 81
forfeiturs Also. Democrats cav The
Territory 70 overwhelmingly Repubii-
can tn politics. and that sending q
Democrat - Delegate on . forfeifurc
platform would be q telling argument
ID favor OF forfeiture hence Ne would
again say 20 Democrats, b consisteus
on this subject and vote for she LeojsIa
ave ticket Of this club, to strengthen
tnat argument and show that you mean
what yon SAY,
The greater the majority for Voorhees,.
81 she same time she greater the major
ity for the Republican Legislative
ticket the stronger the arRument before
Congress that the people are really in
earnest on this forfeiture question. We
trust all will consider aIl the issuss of
this campaign carefully. and on eleo-
ton day come out and vote the entire
tlcket Of the Young Mems Independent
Political Club. Yet before leaving the
sub5ect it OCCURS to rs that We noticed
short life sketches, ia O former issoe Of
this paper, Of Judges Jacobs, Lewis and
MI. klnnear, hence We append hereto
that OF our other candidate for the Lag
islature.
CHARLES {. NunDAY,
Candidate for Representative, was born
In Sonona County, California, October
.. 1858. and educated in the common
and high schools Of that county. He
graduated from the high school at Peta-
luna In 1876. No. in class OF 33. He
then taught school one year. having a
list grade certificate and standing No. |
IN class Of - examined. In 1877 he |
entered Columbian University Law
School Ia Warrington, d. c., and grad. |
uAted 10 June, 1878. He Was admitted |
20 she bar Of the Supreme Court OF the |
District Of Columbia In May. 1879, one |
month before graduating. Mr.. Munday
commenced the practice Of Law in |
Sonsms County, California, In October,
1873, and continued in practice there up |
to the time Of coming 10 seattle in No |
vember. 1881. Immediately upon arrival |
In Seattle, in November, 1881, he entered |
The law ofilce Of w. II. White as partner |
and has ever since continued in the L
practice Of the Law in this place. Mr.. |
Mnnday is young man of sterling |
worth In she community, aud IL elected, |
as he will be, will do COED service for
the people.
THE CANDIDACY or Nh. o. .. JONES.
The universal satisfaction with which
The nomination of Mr.. q. 8. Jones has
1sen received is highly gratifying to the
earnest yorker in the cause Of educa.
lion, his extensive and suocessful expe-
rience in school work, and the effioiency
With which he has always performed the
same. together with bis popularity
among his CO. workers, should secure his
That nv. Jones 10 thoroughly quail
lied for the position Of School Superin.
tendent IN an established fact, be hav-
Ing performed satisfactorily the duties
Of the office for the past two years.
During this time he has been instru-
mental In establishing many new schools
throughout the county, and has intro
duced various reforms in the conduc
lion of the Same. None are more deep
y interested In this matter than those |
who have childrfu under the super
vision Of Mr.. Jones, and knowing, a.
you do, that he 10 hrm but kind dis.
We beseech you 10 not only |
vote. but 10 assist as by work, in secur- |
Ing his re. election.
10 was only the lack of experience on |
the part of one. and total incompetency |
,n the part of the other nominee that |
saused as 10 make an independent nom-
nstio u, but we recognized how essen
Iial it was or the success of our schools |
hat person perfectly versed and fitted
10 teach should have charge Of them.
o. n BOWMAN.
Feeling that the notice given In the
luaiif ifcations of Mr.. @. 4. Bowman for /
Ihe Office Of Justice Of the Peace was
20 incomplete as to be misleading, we /
make the following statement:
Mr.. Bowman is 81 years of age. Pos
sessing good general education, be oh
tAined his legal educstion during four /
years. study in the Office Of Judge A. Il.
Greene. one OF the abiest attorneys of
his State. He was admitted 20 the bar /
in the year 1879. He then began the
practice Of his profession, which be con-
Iinued until his removal TO this city in
The fall OF 1850. He opene hts Law Of |
ice ia this city in the spring OF 1852
and has ever since BEEN engaged In ac-
live prsctics. Mr.. B,wman is a close |
student, and has always identified him-
self with the causa Of right and jsstise.
He 10 we'll qualified BY study, expert
ence and qualities OF mind for the Of
dee for which be has been nominated. |
ard il ele ted will prove an honest and |
efficient fficer.
PARALLEL CASE.
EprroR DArros JOURNAL;
Az yoa say. in recent issus OF your
paper, the Office of school Superintend-
emit is an important one 10 the people.
contend that no one but q prasticai