National Republican., 1884-04-15
The Supreme Court.
The following deciions were rendered in tn

The following deci,ions were rendered in tn o
supreme cou rt yesterday;
No. 296 Simeon b. Armour, plaintiff in error,
VS.. Charles +. Graham. In error to the circuit
court OF the United States for the district OF Kan
sas. Judgment reversed with costs, and cause
remanded for further proceedings to be had
therein In conformity with the opinion OF this
court. opinion by Justice Gray.
No. 2i3. William Irvine appellant VS.. Sumner
7. Dunham. Appeal from thi Circuit court of the
United States for the district OF California. Decree
affirmed with costs Opinion by Justice Woods.
No. 202, The United States, appellants, ys. Her.
bert NJ. Carpenter. Appeal from the circuit court
of the United States for the district of Minnesota
Decree reversed and cause remanded with direc-
tions to overrule the demurrer, the defendant TO
have leave to answer. Opinion BY Justice Field.
No. 20l. Robert @. Chambers ct al, appellants,
vs. James Harrington ct al. Appeal from the su.
preme court of Utah, Decree affirmed with costs.
Opinion by Justice Miller
No. 297. Anton Eilors appellant, vs., ~ @, Boat.
man ct al. Appeal from the supreme court of
Utah. Decree affirmed with costs. Opinion by
No. 1883. The Houston and Texas Central Rail.
way company ct al, appellants, VS.. Thomas NJ,
shirley. Appeal from the circuit court Of the
United States Tor lie northern district Of Texas
Decree affirmed with costs. Opinion by Chief
No. li37. The Board of Supervisors of the
county of Santa Cruz, plaintiff In error, vs. The
Santa Cruz Railway company. In error TO the
supreme court of the state Of California Dismissed
for want OF Jurisdiction, Opinion by Chief Jus
M. II. Original, ex parte. In the matter of Al.
bert Grant, petitioner, RulO To show cause
granted, relutnable on second day OF the next
term,
No. 57S Ex parte. In the matter of Louis
Reggel, appellant. Motion to advance denied.
No. 1850 John +. Paulisan, receiver, Sc., appel.
liant, vs., The United States, and No. 1878, The
Great Western Insurance company appellant, vs.
The United States, Motions to advance granted
and causes set down for argument on the second
day OF the next term after the cases heretofore as
signed for that day.
These are claims growing out of depredntions
by confederate cruisers. The court OF claims re.
fused TO take jurisdiction OF them, and It's action
in SO refusing has been brought before this court
for review.
The other proceedings yesterday were as follows;
NO 1870, joseph Davies, collector, &r,, plaintiff
In error, vs.. the United States, eN rel Austin Cor
bin ct al, Motion 10 dismiss submitted.
No, 745, Alfred Berry, appellant, VI, b, T. Green;
No, H7, j. q. Brown, appellant vs.. h. +. Green;
No. 7ls, j. S. Burhnns appellant VS.. u. Il. Green;
No, 7i9, John Darsh, appellant, vs. Is. L, Green;
No. 750, Q. T. nunham, appellant VS.. u. f. Green;
No. l5l, 7, !, French appellant, vs.. b. i. Green,
No, 1852, William Gale, appellant, vs. Is. Il. Green
No. 1888, James u, Piersou, appellantvs B. Green;
No. 75I, John n scnenGk, appellant, ys. B f.
Green and No 765, A, Nandeyentur Nppelantvs.
B, f, Grren, Motion to dismiss submitted.
No, SO2, The Chicago Milwaukee aud st, Paul
Railway company, plaintiff in error, VS.. Duane o.
NO, No. SIS The Central Railroad and Banking