The Middlebury register and Addison County journal. [volume] (Middlebury, Vt.) 1883-1885, 1884-10-24
The Legislature.
RIGHTS OF MARRIED wOMEN-TIIE con-
TESTED SEATS.

paCe III Cile oeIlaCG over tlle olil' lntro-
uuceu vy oe"'soi lue:l o'".lilS W 'he RLo-
per'y liSiUe VI n ii ,ee "u'iion ms
olll Coo.l.es anu sl'llpliilee u.ic raw as ~
now is, anu ~ ais1 lhahes so,lie "ia.ellal
auuiUlons; IL uiahes .i"il leu Mol''all
IiaDle on her contracts IN an action aC
law anu olnus ner seP"t"Ve pr9porHy 80
!nat SUE may sue anu oc sueu "l.houU
JOINING iier nusoahu Us PialTViil Vi ue-
lenua i ~ t'e ACTION, anu al property
acqulreu ny ,iel III auN lla ,r,3 otloic vi
luIIlS tovel.u.c sllal, vo nV , ~ ne e"ic
anu oTpaia.o ua1, anu I I; n .,i;., o",
no, ,iou Pl'oo ~ "U iiis oNn u1'o s Mionp.U
liel co'iset,Vi nor Is ilo l,aole io' me- "uoVs
I I "ot $500 uuiolc ma ,,iSo; ms ~ a
.ons "'i. "nco VoMaie piaoS La, .i iIu
mUtien ~" az nv, equei i'oo WIN WV. ~
, ,n'.,, ne oiu oom','o'e law VI
r;nS ianu pia0ou vnc 1929 VI i ~ 'i,"l
llo' mo'ii"n ~ iloi iiuoo,.uu Il'Ie
anu sl'1 Couiu III no , ,,iaii,ic. nc'P ici SUI
III ,'ic IanSuaSc vi pi,ohsUoho' i,uoo any
anu WIZ M ".c on1 anu w - .li''U
onc ne .ie''1 VI ltS,sna'' ~, 'i hI, oeu
sleaully IL, Ciic u'' G u .,iis oi', "nu
III CONSERVATIVE Eng u'nu' MnIso sUep5
aIe never IetrosresslNG' tile iu9o C anu
Mile oin Tscn SUE caO,l '.i,e' "o''vo.s
Oh tie olli ana successfully met al oo-
JecClpls tiiaS WIZ , uiseu "S".noU u' 1on.
aUoI Tue salu va. lllcIe was icilleuy
against a married woman now LOT ueoC
incurred ny htr' ny clrcuiVoua process
III GoulC vi cllallceiS t tiiaV Upuli
c,ldhoely was olS Tiio '5
anu Mirin az ut SC,nS tuni, al
the Urist for toll The nronosed law
much trouble and exnense would be avoid
ed. Senator Paul n middle-aped bach
eIor onnosed tho hin with determino-
tion which would indicate an inclination
to motrimonv. for no bosod his onnosi-
tion nrincinaIlv on the ground that such
a 10 ~ would tond to destrov that unitv
co necessary to the nermanencv of the
marital reIation lie feared that if would
incraase the divorces GRANTED fftv ner
cent if q woman conId MANAGE her own
nronertv without fine interference or con
rant of har husband Snch n business-
lil,a vav would SAVIOR foo much of an Or
binary n,rtnershin which MIGHT he dis
solved at the ontion of either PARTNER. In
renIv Senator Ide showed that an indus-
trions nnerUntic woman was often bereft
of her earnings to sunnort n shiftless
drunken husband, and divorce suits
were often instituted by the very fact
that woman could not control what
was rightfully her own. The bill passed
the Senate by vote of twenty-seven to
three. The same bill was passed in the
Senate of 1882 by vote of twenty mine
to one, but defeated in The House by a
small majority.
The hill cran.inc nension for life to
Andrew w Kezer7 who was Injured at
tbe St .Johnsburv muster was nassed
after some onnosition nv a vote of TWEEN
tv-five to five in tbe senate The onno-
sition urged that If was establishing q
had nrecedent and fhe state would here
aftor no troubled NV numerous onnli-
cants for nensions Init if was we'll said
in renIv that if if is riuht to nension this
man the nrncadant can vol he afforded
and If was onIv oivin~ , moor hlocl;,
smith denrived If his ripht arm. one
third of What the national Government
vouId have allowed him for the same
loss The nonsIon ne allowed is fen dol
iorc y month and If seems but inst that if
the state militia has TO obey orders and
act undor the direction of State ot1i
GERS that they should he nronerlv cared
for in eases of this kind
nv ,,-,., H., ,. :.
g u'I
UarIi ~ i''. o. ~ T hia Vi 90 thn
pui 'oii oolU,'Vo ms SOU va WV
Siouhus' n.sv' ~ i tto liz H ' ,ia',
WIZ inole NT'oa ~ 'no o"i'oU ~ ka ii,",i
vi l.c clcch Us. eoo1iu' VIZ o s'C
coulleu Werc ny plln'cu III iES"i ~ W.
many, many i,atinS pinS tne Noiu tiurh'In vi
.ilc.i uil'tu 'ii'. 'iio Notoo 9ilQu,i ~ nav
peeii counseu ~ eile P,c1eioo To-; % 'nI ~,
20 llis.e"u u oeS ."ncn ,n.T ''o.,J
tp oouupiJu T Eh .ie .o"n ctP' iii" anu
,it, Z ooul.cu' l5n' 1i .oP Va uli'. =, d
IN, nllI ilas pccn ,hu,ouuocu W VIriie p ..ic
i iiiie pe."uIii nu,,iaSt9n Inu opi''i DUR
iiiiS.oh M,iloll wouru p'I,iS niH no'lo
wtilil ,t Slic taAt0le lll1i!ts Vi
IL, iiiiI oiil We uci1a ~. wv I"i IS anu
mas mas oee,, .eieIIeu " speci"i Ioni'h'Stte
iIo.i oh'tSefuei c1un'y, i ny, W. W.
I1ophlhs uel"nueu hilhseli peiole me
coIl.ilttee on eiectlohs aSa'iSl MI. Ell
iiS',u olia' Sc, say inS Ilia' CliI oons;a
rirbt no, hove hoon hoord IN, rho town
clerk every time he called out a name.
This statement appears plausible; and he
rave several instances in support of this