New-York tribune., 1884-01-25
MRS. DE NELL AND BARON Won GEYso.
THE COOK sHowF HOW THEY SAT IN THE PARLoR
BY EMBRACING THE INTERPRETER.

THE COOK sHowF HOW THEY SAT IN THE PARLoR
BY EMBRACING THE INTERPRETER
In the De Nell divorce proceedings before
Justice Rumsey in the Supreme Court yesterday ME-
Mcclure counsel for Mr.. DE Nell. first asked his client
about the punishment OF his little boy. MI de Mel
said that the OF the slipper was confined manly "
spanking. To Mr.. Parsons Mr.. De Nell SAID that nc
could not tx the date when he discontinued tue nrs'
proceedings against his wife. could he name the
servant who had said that Mrs De Nell was guilty OF
impropriety OF conduct.
Mr. ParsOns-when you first went 20 FranEensoad did
you TO the bathhoue aud take down the number OF
Mr.. DE Meli-I was there several times; took down
the number on one occasion
Mr.. DE Nell then let the stand having been under
examination for fo1r days. B1r. Mcclure read the
deposition OF Flora Ohrsch OF Dresden who had been In
Mr. De Mes employ from May /, 1876 10 April. 1871
she said that Mr. De Melis OF his wife was
generally good. The affidavit OF DR.. Karl Julius Zumpe,
the old family physician forth that he found Mrs
DE Nell good wife and loving mother. Mr.. De Nell
he said, never spoke to him about placing Mrs De Nell
in asylum had the doctor suggested H. He
had never seen Mr.. De Nell intoxicated lie could say
nothing but what advantageous TO Mrs De Nell he
had heard anything OF the charges against her,
further than that Mr De Nell had told him that the
cause OF Mrs. De Melis flight her intimacy with
Baron Won Geyso Mr. Mcclure also offered IN evidence
the decree OF divorce obtained by Mr. De Nell from Mrs
DE Meu IN Germany on july 80 last on the gTOunu vi
unfaithfulness set forth that Baron Won Geyso had
been seen with his arms around Mrs De Nell, that on
one occasion the two were together IN Mrs De Mels
apartments when servant girl entered tie room; and
that they lived IN adjoining rooms in hotel IN Eyer
After Ir. Mcclure had read the degree Mr.. Parsons
made vigorous protest against the opposing counsels
method OF conducting his oase the decree not yet
evidence and plainly used TO prejudice the case
asked for complete copy OF the record for exann
alton.
Justice Rumsey-Tf the German divorce should be
accepted in evidence, mat would 10 settle The whole
Mr.. Parsons fs entitled to know the contents OF
the record.
Mr. McClure-I withdraw the decree for the present.
The deposition OF Lydia Schulz. mliner stated that
Baron Won Geyso's visits to Mrs. De Melt few
weeks apart and OF short duration. The Baron kissed
and embraced her whenever they met Tho deponent
once entered the room where The two were and the
Baron dlsengaged himself from Mrs. De Nell and Mrs
De Nell asked her what she wanted.
After recess Laura Selma Fischer Mr. De Mels cook
testified:
have known Mrs De Nell since 1850, when went
into the employ OF the family n cook aAd remained as
such until Mrs. DE 1lcl went away -ihee Iueh nave
remained IN Mr.. De Melis employ lie always uraicq
his wife well They generally spoke English, which
could not und rstand never saw MN a,t ia a .iie %
manner coward her. never saw Mrs DC Mel cry When
spoken 10 by her husband. The boy cried easily.
never saw Mr.. DE Nell drunk. | saw Baron Won Geyso
al Mr. DC Me's house the second or hlId day aItr
went there and frequently anerwaUi, unul Mrs.
De Nell left her husband The Baron called several times
q week generally alone. between II and II o'clock.
io Neii 70 4 ,n, tbat need uof omen the door for
the Raron she would open ii herself saw t1em IN the
parlOr occasion sitting together The Baron had
lis arm around Mrs. De Meis shoulders; they were
sitting chairs placed close together. They got up
quickly when entered the room.
position OF the Baron and Mrs De Nell she rose and
placed her left the shoulders and partly about
spectators laughed and the Justice used his gaYe to save
tue dignity OF the court