The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1884-05-10
Order of Publication.
Rralph Thayer, plaintiff,
against

against
Nancy Mitchell, James II. Mitchell, her hus-
band. Franklin Tnayer, Thomas Mason, So
phrOnia DenniSon and Smith Dennison her
husband, stephen Mason Eliza McVeigh
and Patrick McNeigh, her husband Martha
/ Butcher and - Butcher her husband,
Sarah Marcus and William Marcus, her
husband, Mariah Clarkson and - Clark
son, her husband, Marian Browning and
John L. Browning, her husband, Sophronia
Grimes, stephen Thayer. Eliza Dixon, Helen
Ashby and William w. Ashby, her hus-
band, defendants.
No. 3O6 Equity. In the Circuit Court for Gar
rett County.
The object of this Bill is to procure decree
for the sale of the real estate of which the late
Martha Thayer died, seized and possessed
and have the proceeds of such sale distributed
among the heirs Mt law OF the said Martha
| Thayer according to their respective inter-
ests.
The Bill states that the said Marth Thayer
was in her lifetime seized and possessed of q
tract land lying in the Town of Oakland,
Garrett county, Maryland containing five
acres, that being seized and possessed of
said land she departed this life intestate in
the month of December, A. d. 1863 leaving
the following children and heirs at law to-
law. Ralph Thayer, franklin Thayer and
stephen rbayer, her sons, and the following
daughters, to-wIt: Nancy, whOintermarried
with James II. Mitchell, Jane, who inter-
married with William Mason, Mariah, who
| intermarried with John L. Browning, Sophro-
mia, who intermarried with Thomas Grimes,
Eliza. who intermarred with James Dixon
and Helen, who intermarried with William
! W. AShby.
The Bill further states that since the death
of the said Martha Thayer, Thomas Grimes,
| husband OF the aforesaid SOphronia Grimes,
| James Dixon, husband of the aforesaid Eliza
! Dixon, have died, leaving their said wives
| surviving them.
The Bill further states that since the death
! of the said Martha Thayer the said Jane Ma
son and William Mason, her husband. de-
parted this life, said Jane dying intestate,
| leaving the following children and heirs at
| law: Thomas Mason and stephen Mason,
their sons, and the following daughters, to-
wit: Sophronia, who intermarried with Smith
DennisOn, Eliza, who 1ntermarried with Pat
rick McNeigh, Martha, who intermarried
with - Butcher, Sarah, who intermarried
With William Marcus, and Marian, who in
termarried with - Clarkson.
| The Bill further states that all of the said
! children and grandchildren of the said Mar
| tina Thayer are over twenty-one years of age,
The Bill further states that said real estate
| is not susceptible of division among the par
ties entitled thereto, and prays for a sale of
| said real estate, and n distribution of the pro-
ceeds under the order ofthe court. The Bill
further states that Nancy Mitchell and James
H. Mitchell her husband, Franklin Thayer,
Thomas Mason, Sophronla Dennison and
Smith Dennison, her husband, stephen Ma
son, Eliza McVeigh and Patrick McVeigh, her
husband Martha Butcher and - Butcher,
her husband, Sarah Marcus and William Mar
Gus, her husband. Marian Carkson and -
! ClarksOn her husband, stephen Thayer and
| Eliza Dixon are nOn-reSidents.
The Bill prayS for the usual process, and
also for an order Of publication against the
aforesaid nonresident defendants
II is therefore ordered by the Court this 10Th
day of April, A. u. 1884, that the plaintiff cause
n copy of this order together with the object
and substance of the BIZ to be inserted in
some newspaper published in Garrett county,
once n week for four successive weeks before
the 25th day of May. A. ID. 1884, giving notice
to the said Nancy Mitchell and James III.
Mitchell, Franklin Thayer Thomas Mason
SOphrOnia DenniSOn, Smith DennisOn, ste
phen Mason. Eliza McVeigh and Patrick Nc.
Weigh, Martha Butcher and - Butcher
her husband, Sarah Marcus and William
Marcus, Marian Clarkson and - Clarkson
her husband, stephen Thayer and Eliza Dix
on, and warning them to appear I'm this Court
in person or by solicitor on or before the Isl
Monday of September, A. d. 1884. TO show
cause, ifany they have, why decree should
not pass as prayed
w. II. TOWER,
Clerk Circuit Court for Garrett county.
| True cOpy-Test:
1924 W. II. TOWER, Clerk.