The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1884-05-13
CIRCUIT COURT.
Motions Filed and Entries Made
in Number of Cases
Yesterday.
FIRST DAY.

menced yesterday, Judge Strother presid
ing There are more than six hundred
cases on the docket, and the session vii
probably continue several weeks.
The following is the record of proceed
ings yesterday:
George G.Vest VS.. Curtis Field, repleviu
continued by agreement.
| L. 3. Murray ex. rel. Curtis Field vs.
James Harris, ct al, suit on bond; con.
iinued by agreement.
Casey Young VS.. NJ. K. & T. railrosd
suit Tor damages motion 10 set aside non.
suit overruled.
NJ. c. Bixby VS.. Kruse & Fredericks, suit
for damages; defendants file joint answer
c. c. Holton VS.. Charles w. Clark ct al,
suit on account defendants file answer.
Nettie Barge VS.. John Baker defendant
files answer.
Same VS.. John Housman same entry.
Same VS.. John Riley same entry.
First National bank VS.. Geo. w. Hughes,
suit in equity ; dismissed by plaintiff at las
costs.
John d Crawford VS. Morris Harter, ct
al, suit on note defendants file answer.
John Lebermsn VS.. James B. Wilcox,
suit on notes defendant files answer
Missouri Pacific Railway company VS..
Morris Sullivan, condemnation John
| Newman and wife withdraw exception.
| Anna Burmeter VS.. Z. G. Bailey, GER
tiorari settled and dismissed at plaintiffs
cost.
Beedle & Kelly vs. S. n. White, ct al
suit on note; defendants White and Stew
ART file separate answers.
B. ID. Buford g. Co vs.S n. White ct al,
suit on note: same eutry
First National bank VS.. Geo. w. Hughes
ct al, dismissed by plaintiff at his cost.
John Keele VS. James Vaughn, suit on
account; stipulations filed and cause dis
missed at plaintiffs cost.
b. ID. Buford & Co. VS. John r Stewart
ct al, suit on note; defendant files de-
murrer to amended petition.
Mary q. Nelson, administrative, VS. L.
+. Short, attachment; defendant files
answer.
Joseph Higgins VS. Joseph L. Cartwright,
suit on note; right of trial by jury
waived, and case set for trial May 9Th, or
as soon thereafter as possible.
Charles Keck VS. Rudolph Schmidt Brew
ing company, suit on note defendant flies
motion to quash sheriff's return.
Richard Anderson vs. Jacob Marshall,
appeal; cause docketed and transcript
fled.
Anna L. Burmester VS. E. c. Bailey, Ger.
tioarsri; settled and dismissed at plant
ifs cost.
Charles r. Vanderman VS. Henry Bnck-
am, suit in equity; settled and dismissed
Anna l.. Burmester VS. o. G. N Burmes.
ter, divorce; dismissed by agreement.
SECOND DAY.
Almost the entire time of the circuit
court was consumed yesterday in the hear.
ing of evidence in the case of Bennett, Car |
ter & Co., against Lewis Gerhard, a suit on |
contract The testimony was concluded |
last evening and argument will be made
this morning.
The following entries were made in other |
cases:
Jarratt & Gilliland VS.. Queen City Co
operative society judgment by consent for |
$3.50.
Same VS.. same judgment for Sl25.
Same VS.. same judgment for SS2.29.
Same VS.. same /; judgment for $20.25.
w. j. Ilgenfritz ct al. VS.. Queen City CO.
operative society; motion TO guash writ and |
attachment overruled; plea in abatement
overruled and attachment sustained judg-
ment for plaintiff by consent for S67 20.
Sarah Z. Bradley, ct al, VS.. James Cook;
dispositions taken In case of III. L. Cook
filed in this case and will be admitted as
evidence.
II IL ven< rs. A. d. Fisher, ct al; de-
fend. AS tie separate answers.
A. j. Hail VS.. r NJ. Fraker, Ell al; w.
w. Snoddy files separate answer.
Jennie A. Fail, ct al, VS.. John Stryker,
et al; defendants file separate answers.
Pettis county Bank, VS.. o. A. Crandall
defendants file answer.
THIRD DAY.
In the case of Bennett, Carter & Co. vs.
Lewis Gebhsrt, suit on contract, which
almost the entire time of the
court Tuesday, the jury yesterday morn
ng returned a verdict for the defendant
The greater part of the time of the court
vas taken up yesterday in the trial of the
.ase of NJ. V. Gorrell ct al, a suit to set
sside will. A large number of witnesses
we're examined, and the case is still pend
ng.
The following is the record of proceed
ngs In other cases:
ID. T. Abel VS. A. P. Espenschied, garni-
hee of A. ID Fisher ct al. plaintiff files in
to gsrnishee.
Zacsriah F. Taylor VS. Sarah F. Taylor
defendant files answer to cross bill.
VIM. Grimminger VS. M. S. Conner; de- -,
endent files motion In dismiss appeal.
M. c. Bixby rs w. s. Horr; defendant |;
lies answer.
The Aultman & Taylor Co. VS. w. y. Means
( al; judgment by default and final for
SIS with eight per cent. interest.
Aultman, Miller & Co, vs. III. Clay Tsy-
or ct al; judgment by default and final for )
263 with six per cent. interest.
Same vs. Wayne /. Davenport ct al; judg. !
,ent by default and final for Sl34.60 with
tx per cent interest.
Isaac Adkins VS. Adam Fischer; plaintiff t
les motion to affirm judgment of justice s.
the peace. '
r. c. Spaulding vs. Jennie Dawson ct al;