Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1884-04-26


..ros Arrr,.lls;t nis county.
81 sl ~. Csc was fc 'Ir, an ntss as
. ts,i he IunisnII'nIeev every
eci NY an intent 70 ~ be
by, sslhisn must, ia a. i IeIi at
in 81, s' o. prepars,''SSe In
~. ,ssIliu injury that m no evidence
Us !, show any act u W ~, his
dIg,s assIcaiing 2 pnr y psd and re-
insrssuIt. Reverse
% t,s ga. Nc
Railway compaMnSye Wien a rail- .
q mi " county; ~ which il
sfssns lime within Wider 10
Y IN M pot entiiale We, W. lime. I'm.
v,rsiion Of tha y, w m, law tand
q Statute upon =, 'n his state
q ,ale applies ~ ~ W." elect the
s,'ssaye iht rignt " ,ro,pt on
,,sepssslpg .. I HIN oil. But
! ,gihocse to put ! n !, y u, regard v the
Z moi required , ,vs'6 he puts
|spIspce as 70 Mare and In
9. .sIect him WHEY, s safety,
hi endargeT h's ,nnl
himself liable iy more force
az use no .l l'o'' and il
.sssfy 10 eJec,, a is no
sssessary vioieny'ee;, rules.
ap9s.edsnt had viols Wing fare
rsIsiutlff for not H., az, was
,,cr Of a limlt,e,a a rom town,
w about a mile i r,rht and
Y an 4 cold, damp ~, n s,n.shoi.
Ssring from an N G ,he carrier.
w wss known 70 a Il,, r' care
= aid not use oiu' h,,t acted
lss d ele ,., me, o"' "
y State, fIom Collin ,, ~ iss,,e
,s5snl denial |, y !, so lions in lie
n issusble allega ,on Sn ~, n
,iop. In an ac.ion sar rp the
'csd, the citation J, or sei, denial
,Iiiou. and q gens sns,,,n,ina
,sas allegations ' o ,',Sy,i IL was
c(scllon. Wneis ~ y, was in.
IN no cause OF ny Y, ,a,,,ajn
I, ofirial by jury s,ia : ,forfniped
! proceedings upon = ~ to' ' same
,asrmert nis,, are a 'ne com.
|. snd 10 clyll css ~ ,,ar,y do.
.,slctory rules NJ rppsnr5 Tho
s1,dio ajrry., W nvie n,,or ~
n complied, IL IVA, was Wben n
* nom inc Jul! s mr. y
Nsrs officer aires ,e,n ~ T., i,
IN warrant loi !, y ,r lin, bafor,
! Il. party ior'nW ,,nr,Ded p ~
ID he Is not au .a,n M y
4. Reversed anu ie''''
,,,,r 10
HulInr,fron paiias toI". cn,ys y
"a for shooting ni, ,, 'V ,ma,
headed In reuonNeh,,on,, nnad
aIIy and inallciouss q a nh 10.
rsx into his premises ~" ,ia AZ A.
Las he alleee"i = w. n,,IJ
vssa lawful one, ne wy vi ~,
both actual ana eae .,a III, VI n !; >
be cour! erred m ,ion sus,''" 'rhs
he plea 10 Iecons !. o slss,rn iuio.
nlilliur to cure excessiSe inus
spply to actions lor ua, ,,,', !,
lie damages are un.sr'i,, L.,
4 discretion oil the JuIS, ~
measure Of damages Is Iiia. |.
4, special actual oainage ~
lles was entitled 70 loss VI III !,
CO.'S which was tne hi M ~, \
BIB lost; ifof no maiket 'ai .,,,
aahle value 70 plalnt,n VIII !. =,
Ageneral actual 9a,,aSy'
rtiled TO natural anu pioA'
Ibis cow, Inc measure y
difference between tneiL Salu u
isef the injury. ENIueiu
insufficient 70 snow any ge e.
Alawlul lence Is one ~
compact enough 10 prevent W
4 II appellants lence VA
entitled 10 damage aone n,
nyeni injury. reversed "h'
glllson, j. ~ -,
Tie Railway VS.. Wneal, lroI
". This was . sun 10 Ieco'e
Killed BY the appellant !
pelluon declared upo
d ladlng, anu ne
Hllsnt as a common carrie
lkoat The INTRODUCTION IN eNl
" o. ladlng, the plalnnlll OF
frted ioa Judgment. inc SUI
ion me Dill OIL laulng anu nc
nliaolli'y asa common cal
sni o. iiie. contract, the coui
pysn me cnafge nsked py ~
u. OIL q iading IN eNlaen'
ahnoI be helu llapIe unle-
i,he uamsses occurred on VI
~ ioaa. Nol error 70 5eios
slnase OF case nov ihi'ue .
= REVERSED anu reihahue'
-, ,,.
ny oale, rom iarrant couhl'
y " mls case was lor asgri
W. Ina Y, on one Kuhn; IN
~ oy NE verdict was n me
!. ~ lrilei upon iof ieNersai
Nv ~ wi. W grant MS hpPilc'
.auaI ,.., butah lhspectloh d.
49, .osai ~uiit VI uIiisehce
''I !, ,'.i. y, l,ie apseht Wine,
,l w i, Ml.uih M power !
~ y .as.,s,aa ~ wh'eii YOU'D
" xculisa ,ne attendance {
!, s', \. ~, uIaer such state
y, = y. sossl,alneu 70 hold Una
1-'V'uphuahce was not efro
s,,,. -,
SHAW s,ios sp ,,i rom Ellis coul
e1on IN lhls case was for q
~. ~. " LAY WIN a suck, aud th
= nv. a ,,ssi the appelial
NJ, ,,a a,i III ,n ~ a LOT new tri'
ssanent Oh error nor n bill
ri,ra, mum. W ~, III the lfahscrip
.i.ssv ~ ,I,u ,eere is nolhiI
4 lax ~ 'n !, e,iu !. Y, 10 suppo
~ AZ AM NJ =. i..ssNihciency Is M
sist s"a an = ample. Alllrmed.
amen, a X H. rom ON. Bowie coul
4 SsI'Is r 1, .,iis csse charged u
isr IN Inc w, sa. and lne cohVictic
ihs ..n,,s ss,phu degree, VII
Thsah,o .sa1siafy awarded
Ia, !, ii Z Ssssh urge urged to y
anS sn,a Uaseu upon q verdi
,I lne t.e.,,hmony falls To sho
" killing Ent liz VI hiailoo
lhy IN ,do oa. 'he objection
Enthad IA ,Sicp,o, u appearil
I, All .s rai pieyions qnarrt
Iarclus, Thy MS pistol wi
l.x af,Sa o ine court proper
Atirmsd' is', ana the evident
A. 49,.
a lbai stn. from sl tannin con
b, Ia annai,sn,i,,i ot Tue murder
q az nd Ir Tss an.y was convicted
ssss III pissn,is,e a l as punis
I'D, ibe =, a,., .he case turns up
IssSawc ss san 70 support I
a,.ssSS ed v, eip,9nlelusiyely that I
u iesnl, sai,ii,nNy In a person
ssanon 'ur nfst OF the two
! sbs "a ssui y. .liS. Other gu
slils. An At,,, o. o,lls of exceptit
b Aoapa i, intel
Ii va ! appeal from Grays
nanls' y, ss IVY, Tor DANA es
RslrSs, a ! l ! olreal estate. !.
~ sourt a. z, error canno, be CT
51ffsa,- TIE want of hills