The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1884-02-22
Tho Detectives Work up q Mystery ~
Galveston.
Fries, OF San Anionic, a Defauiter
After all.
Mexican Editors Meet on tho Field
or Honor.
What IL golpg op at The State
Capital.
A Tooihsche and . Tragedy al
gainesville.
A Mlscreant Attempts TO Fire Block
In Greepville.
Ana Other News by Specials.
GALVESTON.

GALNEsIoN.
GALyH.ros, Feb. 2i.-[5peciSl l-Sundsy
morning, the 81 instant, Mrs. Anderson, t,
wife Of Col. q. u. Anderson, left ber house
at The corner of Ninth and Mechanic streets.
wi,h the zyowed intention OF cJmmitt1s
suicide, leaving n note 10 her soii, youns
man employed NJ Il b. Woodsob's, To ihat
effect. As soon Ms her disappearance was
discovered search WAS instituted Tor her
body. AS IL was believed by her son tha, she
bsd nut hor threat Into execution, bnt
vithout avail. A lev days sliergArds C1l
A Anderson ~ ached Galveston from New Or
leans. and i'm IN, diaieIy ltced hsr case Ia
the hands OF Hrnnessy's d,te1tiv. agency,
vino on the 9h instm I began thu work
of cleeriug up the mystery Attending her
dis,pp.a'nnce. Mr.. Henn'ssy osc' rinined
that the dny Mrs. Anderson disappeared n
LADY riyin. the name Of Me. webb had lett
Tie city fhr Denver, OOlocadD aud Oh the
fnlloviug dny auofher l.dy, giyi1g her
name ns Mrs. McBfide had l-it Tor 81.
Iouis Feeling confident tnht ono Of 'hc
ladies' was Mrs. Anderson, Detective H.n
messy di-psi ched ore W hle uliicera 10 ihn
above points. iIa found the ladies. bur
only TO ascertain that he wa. on the "fonR Z
track. lie came 10 tns conclusion that The
missine lady Was hid away, II alive. III ~.
city, and began to concentrate ell
his energies ut this point anu
he was rewarded at ls,t oy locstir 4
The l,cy We, terdsy at tho boarding house
of Ms Mary Miller, on Market street. be-
tween Eighteenth and Nlutsenth. rms
morning, In company with superintendent
John Frisbie OF the Hennes'y agency, who
In come ctiou with him has worked up this
case. Hennsssy repaired to Mrs. Miller's
aud finding the lsdy took her In charge and
has her Ia his possession. From what
could be learned Mrs. Anderson went 10
this house within q day or two after her
| dissppearance and her identity ~as ina 2
known TO the laDdlady by her when The &C
coun. OF the affair wes made public. but
she imploring the lsdv tn say hing, ,h"
| uhe lAndlady) kept ia,th with Mrs. hnder-
son and eyen denied Dor preseDcs when De-
ttctive Henues.y calisi OF the house. As
We, the motives that y ON Dt-d her o leave
| homs have not heei M ado known and
Colonel Anderson wa, tel.grsphed to ~
| New Orleans, but II Is asres'ained rom BIS
son that he vii not re'urn 10 Galveston.
More developments ar 'osed for to-mor-
row when the true ST, tns OF this mysteri-
| ons and seemingly un nDfoYoked disappear
aDce may be looked ipi.
In the supreme c0ue, motion TO dismis:
writ OF error was Rr tad In Waters Va
Jenn, from Fort B,nG
Motion to dismiss appeal granted In
Perkins vs.. the heirs OF Bates, from Fort
Bend. ,,,
Motion for certiorsrl refused Willis o..
al. vs.. Smith, from Brszorls,
Motion to advance averrulsd: Galveston
Wharf Co. vs.. the City OF Gsyeton, from
Galveston.
Motion 10 set aside dismissal submi it.d
Sydeck ct. al. vs.. Dwisn OF. al. from VIC
toris.
Submitted on briefs OF both parties:
Houston, East. & Weat Texas tsilwsy vs.
n u.r,ia. HnH Ii II
Snip Channel 90. vs.. Miiby e..
sl., from Hnrris; Hart ct. nj
v.. McDade, from Brszor,a; Mas'er'on
vs. Winston, from Brsz,ria; Baker VS.. Ken
nsdy, from HAIRS; Houston Texas
Central railway VS. Schniot, from Harris;
R,k,r W. Stewart, from FoIt B.nd; Texas
& New Orleans rnilwsy vs. Crowdtn e'
nl. from Harris; Galveston, Harrisburg
& San Antonio rsiiwsy VS.. BEL, from
Hsrris: Klyns et al, VS.. Spencer, from
Waller.
Submitted on briefs for both psr,ies and
ornl argument o. appellant: Fisher et sl.
w. Wood ct sl., from Waller.
Submitted on briets OF both parties and
oral and printed argument of plaintin IN
error: OIL VS.. Bamnlel from Harris
Subm tied on bfisis OF appellants: Bra
xorin ouuuty W. Calhoun. from Br,yori..
same va. Turner, from Brszor'; Pciteret
vi. vs.. Sweeney e, ST., rom Brsnoris; Hous
ton & Texas Cenusl railway va. the
State. from Harris.
Submisted on briefs and oral arguments Is
from both psrtisB: Park,ps vs. Dyer, ir0p'
Fort Bend; Smith vs.. Uzzls, from Mont
gomery..
Submitted on briefs for plaintiff in error:
Whitster vs.. Csc, ct Il.: from Waller
Gsines. ct al, W. Bar, 1t nl.. from Harris
Submitted on briefs ard printed arsu
ments fron both parties: Houston & Texas
Central railway vs. Harvey Bros, from
Washington.
Ths rsmarkcble action Ct the Galveston,
Harrisburg Il San Antonio railway Ia dis-
criminrting again,t Galveston 10 favor q
New Orleaps on Nardi Grss is being freely
diseussed, with much uutsvorsple com.
ment. This line has rrducad rates to New
Orleans, which, withstsnding ell otber
Texas railways have done to Galveston,
they refuse to do.