The Kenosha telegraph. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1860-1888, 1884-09-05
ADVERTISEMENT
TO NY FRIENDS AND PATRONt

ADVERTISEMENT
i TO ny FRIENDS AND PATRONS
Its well known to you that since 1855 l hav,
been engaged in compiling and keeping up TO
pubic use an abstract of Land Titles for KenoShs
county Up to this time the correctness anl
sklll displayed in that enterprise was never
After laboriug every day in the week-some-
times fourteen hours day-for a space Of
1 twenty-five years, without vacation, in an eYi
n0ur, TO get that vacation. was tempted tC
take q partner and sell him half the abstract
| conditiOnally.
AT the end of four years, finding it impossible
| to go on longer with that partner fthe partner
| snip having expired a year before by limitatIon)
| the partnership is dissolved but because the
property is not easily susceptible of division,
and because of the binding character of the
covenants contained in the articles of co-part-
nershlp, am compelled to g abide by the STUFF,
| until the option is given or taken, as provided
/ for In the Bill of Sale and articles
When, in compliance With those covenants. Z
o1ered to buy, my late partners reply was. .
will not sell, but will buy you out. win give
| you 5000 more than you offer your interest for
| II you viii sell to me on credit: but I will buv
any way. q have his letter showing thiSl So
| that promising to buy ana never doing It, l was
| forced to keep on and conserve the abstract
| and 1t was this fatal necessity which comDelled
| me TO occupy g common Office for 81 months af--
| ter the dissolution, and. as designed and pre-
| pared, furnished the apparent presumption of a
" Continuing Partnership an allegation which
has been used and the changes rung npon If in
the litigation with which have been saddled. to
accomplish the ends of those inImical to me-
say, apparent presumption, . because if is
notorious and proven, that the notice of dissou-
| ton was published the signs changed the IN
surenee Agencies transferred to me, and the law
business to thatpartner, and that he set lp bust
ness Tor himself, became the correspondent for
the Chicago Times, taking the salary to himself
and there is nothing but this common oecu-
pf4ncy, unSeVered interest and unsettled en1itv
In ha chi o
upon.
The Bill of Sale of the half interest was as
follows -
Know all men by these presents. that 7
Samuel Y Brande, of the CITY Of KenOsha. in
the State OF Wisconsin, for and in consideration
OF the sum OF Four Thousand Dollars to me in
Ha .lnu pald by Herbert M. Theirs, of the said
ClGy OF kenosha, and in consideration Of the
covenants and agreements contained in articles
OF agreement between the parties hereto. of
even date herewith. and the stlpulations and
promises OF the bargainee therein made, have
Dargalned and sold, and by these presents do
grant and convey unto the said Herbert M
liners, and to his executors. administrators and
assigns. subject to the restrictions as 10 sale and
Conveyance as IN said articles made binding On
Doth parties an equal undiyiGedhalf share of all
and singular the abstract books owned bv said
Brande at this date, &C., sc.
The article of c0-partnerShp referred to in
the bill OF sale restricting the right OF disposal is
as follows: =
Art. 10. This partnership IS to continue for
fha 90 es ION Ine uale OF august 1870, but
q partner, OF by mutual consent, NAV be con-
unued by the survivor for the benefit of himself
Smoh in' estatS u Saiu deceased partner until
OF Ine heirs and personal representatives to sell
Sucn interest, when the same shall on such sale
terminate; and it Is understood and agreed
hiS half Of ~ ny pa eeIs = dt liberty TO sell
any person not acceptable as q person to the other
ana satisfactory to the remaining partner and
sa d n,' Eases te partner proposing to retire or
marty pronnsp TO oe 10 Se nus TO the
tba o ploP S 10 remain IN the business, at
offered s1d qf n p naee " W th ne may nave been
the executor or administrators of sncb dacaaSd
partner shall in like n1snnep o q; 9u ~ ues1seu
tile option to purchase M fhe Rasf hoo ee hjd
which thev can et for t FL ooo1 1o rig pa
hai,S on @slil sTG doI Ge same, ana SO OF the
neaSad apto a. l OF SAID de-
fhe sryivor nines sa nsS oer le same 70
said ratiino uItToS q peiSo slall pe lounu by
bairs ~ eAeeator OF administrator.
nSa thP it wiring TO pur
hooks Who sba b % sc Patty Sucn abstract
partner if being the JaSi%D Of - tb sIe
t6at ~ pe rF, Tue 9eSig OF TINS agreement
mon fbe otbe, snan navy tlle fght TO lost
napr Un Gio 3encI Oh oonoAlouS OF unacceptable
Tn To the date o' ~ f;otoho, ,ot,,
heep boi .lio 20 oao0 ~ Oceoper lJtl, 1881 had
tiIa ii - W 9 ter 81 ilpllahce with the ar
olNnoS VI % pdrtneISnlp, Wheh The other party
Scrined to aSd Tue eqyeltS soienly sub
sclioeu " anu maze, and III fraud OF my rights
eiu oi tl,e egG ol dDScondng, turned over what
e i.4iilgll nave aICef settlement of
ri%htS of Si,'i0a, su Gne exercise OF my
mother Ha than ran a. alolesao 10 ms
t T.; u Iae tneu Tan away, leaVlng the proper
W :, ~ my possession,
AZ, ~ would pc very natural for you to suppose
WITH NY IgGod properly gould not interfered
aug aug , nau an 0ptlon IN the contingency which
nronnrtTP Wy ~ ptiIh5eae tldt othef nall the
nossesSion ~ 9'"'oHe' anu hdd
NV former mariner If is trna bod said
formIv ray,s Duy iiot uone so. lie mad uni
ann1,ab loruoou W SCH 10 me Ior purpose plain
enOlgH, now.
HeW, then, you will say. could he deSnotlad
Oh my undouDted property and It's possession
without Judgment liability of any kind
wng Dy prostitution Of the Courts and their pro
cess, Tor the accomplishment of the theft.
E SHOWING IN my laW-abiding character, and that
to rive m NV eptu TEGI make me consent
Section , ooo IL tbp P ~ mi St WAS DY faf, ~ OF
Of Wisconsin ahsoInteiN fr 81 es 6tate
Fyacution o.. 'DooiuCedy GAeliipG from sale on
iSS,d F ~ III uSg PROVISIONAL or na process
G tI lloi d4y OourG OF any proceedings in
selu tneaeoi. leg by the perlured affidavit of
d aaiIdiHnser nhIDlGed Dy the Bill OF Sale and
ArtcleS from purchasing, a Court of Eduity''
( SAY. lne MARK, on notice OF motion of eight
t - olld p[oceeolngs running oyer space of
enont rnnen1 ~ me 10 denver this eX-
M S@la Il not exempt then IN my
nod,uS Wy oIuef 81 the same court as garnShee)
upoh the Stpposta0n tilat 1t IS partnership prop
elIS " q sll5posea lnqlI[erent person, to be held
a. llu llalaSeu DIS tle Tignt should appear. had
" coliSent or 90 10 9dtt for contempt of court
ougllt 70 nave preferred the latter alternative,
duu would NAG Then tully penetrated the de-
sign pun ; had some confidence in the Court and
uhWlillngly surrendered this child of my crea-.
ZION 10 us care. Tor the time being. / was sick.
a and part Of the time confined to my bed while
1uls Eva was . Delhg done:
.. AlteI Two mohChs more have elapsed, l am
eSl9oeqi Siu we properly Is lncontlnently sold
uhueI Tue hammer, as constable having an
execution Would sell barrel Of apples to keep
th tsna dIQ IN Sp0Ilihg during It's life.
rlont IntG tllne 10 TINS; l nave had neither the
propeiby ~ HoE any palt Oh The money for which it
Wa a II 9a tI;s 1I y ~ 5o SoiG y, a,,oo
hnt in ~ o1tn ~ ese9 conformity 70 law
snrt as cs u poG lGs letter and
spun, 90 cSeL prove, IL am alloWed even II
Gll ~ pI0peIty was not exempt, OF burdened with