Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1884-11-02


The snohomish paper (shs Eys) b b.
fore - In & Il = report of IL msss-
Ina sna speech Of Mr. Rishsrd uuboru
= thas placs lAst vsek. II reported
fairly. - - have rsasoa 70 suppos,
NJ. Osborn vss, b b unit 10 rscsSvs
the sn6raees u the eisizsus Of this
ooonsy sd district His alleged 10
marx eonssrninc this Journal vas nm
called Tor. false and vilIainors. and viz
We believe. b resented BY cor entire
,ccai constituency. The Eye reports
NJ. Oss.srn ~ follows.
ms speech vas about fairly divided
u aoos1ne King comfy ornuks' in
general and the Democratic party 10
peticaiar. 10 form some idea Of how
inslnosrs. Inconsistent and hypocriticaI
no y IN ma vain endeavoru 20 obtain
votes. y - ooiy necessary for one Is
read the spceohes OF Recsmmends-
tlon ~ delivered at Newcastle and
nenton. where he spoke just - strongly
70 favor OF for 'eitnre. and compare
slsm Win . synopsis OF tho speech hel
oeiiyersd here which ID - foilosa
Ladies and gentlemen, in 1878 the
great issue between tho Repubiioan and
Democrassc parties vas the paymenf Of
me 6oncs IN Rrsenescks- On that issue
sne Republicans rode to power. Today
90 you hear Democrats talk Of repeal
ln9 she Legal Tender Act, or Resuuu-
ton Act No; they have been taucss
oy past events that they vere wrong.
and four yeara from nov. when ths
raiiroad - CON pleted from Easfern
Washington 70 Puget sound, VOC WON'T
md man in King county Who ever
favored absolute forfeiture. ECheers. /
IL takes the Democrats party about
feur years 10 end out where thew were
wrong liaughterJ. and then they try 20
right this wrong py committing another.
lCreat applause. 80
was in favor Of the absolute forfeit.
urc Of this land grant one year AGO. Al |
tnss time every railroad flunkey Who
came to Seattle was wiued, dined and |
feasted, and the people we're ready 10 |
lick their very feet. Today in that citv |
You hear nothing but :. forfeiture for
feiture Z. and they are as rabid against |
The railroad as they we're for il one /
year ago. Now, don't believe in CO. |
cnpyine the extreme end Of any ques-
lion. = 4
The Republican party says let the
doverument take the lands and eel /
hem 30 actual settlers and nav over 10 |
The railroad on completion Of the road.
Now. ladies and gentlemen, what dit
ference does 1t make 10 as whether the
money goes into the railroad TREASURY
" the Government treasury? Ii makes
10 difference, and say to you there IL
90 much ciap-trap connected with the
ABSOLUTE forfeiture question for any
thinking man to swallow.
Now they call Armstrong a rail road
man. Do they produce any evidence
nat be is q railroad man /? On the
,sher hand read the opinion of Mr..
foorheee in favor Of the railroad, a.
'rinted in the Posi- ISTEILraEscRR In
me Of its 6ops. Il has Topped 90 often
don't remember which hop il ia in,
'ut think 1t was the Aop before the
asst enc"
The Eye further speaks of Mr.. o.
,orn as follows:
While setting 'en mp" in q First
treet saloon after his "soul stirring
'Rti-forfeiture speech last Monday even
nR. the Republican nominee for Prose-
'cuting Attorney of this district made
he remark that il be had to be elected
~ the vote Of the ladies be did NOT
vant the Office. Well, IL he depended
- the vote OF the ladies of this part
Il the district, he would get left by
arps majority, for We learn that out
II about fifty votes in this precinct he
viii. perhaps, receive half a dozen.