The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1884-05-29

/ II ms, b. ufrsd. tnsfVsr, thai IN I'm ~
l tI. ufn.frHfIlIH. ~ Hprflianf NHs charged
viii kftpir thr keno tshle Tor ihe par
7 u1ln M randnf, a. vel. 81 eEhIhiing the
. ,splf. 40 ~ tie yfft.oif anf judgments
l itil iu Shoe iuf Whlch, lhs ltrrins. % lhe
ItH. thifins, b. Wa convicted, nat DO lsfs-
I lisyed OF the burdfu oi proving
lhs Identity a he uirrsr-lhe act NJ e.
I hibiting C1nords Toe the argnmsni, that
/ faerinr The table u clniiIu us oisnse,
aud the above proportion btclmrs very
/ plausible indeed, X fping y iame Tor
| eaming and tanl.y ing y i1r the plrnlteI
/ ~ bttIninE hsiteTs, are different aud dis
tiuot acts, and though Ihe pnliahmenl may
| he the sahr, oefisiuiY tus t0ts ave nov me
/ same. And Shils d NAV DO conceded that
under the rules laid down Va qui'e num-
I Der Of WelI-el sidritd cases, that keTplag
certain bauks or tables or tho purpose "
o1'alning bst,tIs, Is al ohigse continuous
/ Ia its na uTr, yet u does not follow NAV me
act OF displaying these ounss or tables, Is
eonIinuous. But 1T US suppose that tns
eylGeHee-lhe whole reoofd-lesyer u IN
doubt as 10 whether defendant had been
convicted OF The keeping ot tie < no TAME,
which is for tue argument, conunuoufi or
convicted OF tue act o. Displaying the Reno
table for the purpose OF Ootani y he,tefs,
would such evidence meet aaH ~ uns';s
the b arden which rests upon DESCENDANT IN
~ INA On The An day OF ssniembar,
1855? We are clearly Of the opinion mar ~
would not The evidence IN support
nt The pleas OF former convictions or DC
anita. must meet tina whole case to'wii:
| Tne &C. Of displaying as well as the Keep
log, u.less the keeping, in lis elements,
includes all the elements of "iMpiryins
tho baak. or table, Tor me purpose OF oo'
taIn,nr betters." rhst the act Of display
ing the bank or table Tor The purpose OF oo'
tAiaiug betisis isn not included 10 tue charse
OF heep!ng bank or iable iot the pu,,usa
OF GAmiaP. 10 quite evident, We Me oi tne
opiDion, irtl: That the 90, OF dispisying
a bank or table 81 the pnrpose OF Obtaining
he,ters IL not continuous oHeh'c.
Seoond-rhat the burden IS on tne oe'
lentAut to sustain his pleas OF former con-
vctious or acquittals. ,.
Th.Id-That 10 meet anu uNeuarso .no
hurdep, 10 Is Incumbent upon nun 70
isblish oy the tyldenes hat .np ,aes ,hssa
nc, or acts-keepins and uispIhylng-tneso
being charged In the information, ior
wnion he has been tiled and eohViet-a OF
ACQUITTED.
F0ur.h-That the record oe,ore US ia"e '"
furnish such proof, ano MS pleas "ete H''
sustained. .,.,.l
fhis d. poses OF the pea Q. nn' no, uy
Wet aud nu,rein's atqnit--'ormet cow
lions and aoquitals-alleged 10 nave oeen
had IN Il mayors and county court
At tbis point we dean u accessory 70 eA-
r,sg "a opinion ~ Ielef5tce VI u p'.P
non earnestly Insisted ON In Eignment ana
brief OF the learned county ATTORNEY repre-
ssalins the STATE IN these ca'es.
PaopoiIrioS
I ,h ,ns ' snosjd hoid It TO rse exclusion
~ All DINER corrts. IA ugh they may have
c,,cnr,,,t inrjsdIc,ion. Under this propo.
ton n Is commended BY the county nttoF-
ner that snpsIIant had been regularly
TIED convicted, or acquitted, OF the very
a,,ich SopsIlant VAS then being tried, sin
a.,s,s ,rto,mstinn was pending upon the
insu sr,s conf, that court would not
,scsIIv ,.ks jurisdiction Of the. Gaze
ia hat snv oonyic,iop, or acquittil, had
unJer circumstances, could not be pleaded
80, q, = nros.cution under the former
u W. III ,nform stion. All fraud apart, we
= 'n,ot soree To the correctness Of this pro.
on.;,;on Tet ns illustrate: A steals q
Lorse in Eiiis county. and carries IL to Dali
70 conn,y and there seIls IL, He Is in
ajc, sd in Ellis county on the 1st dav of
January. aud In Dallas, on the 4th Of the
ssmh mnnth Caoiases issued on both 10.
S;n,mnn,a and he ia arrested on that from
LIZ .n,,n,v uivss hond. and Is arrest ed by
's ssa,,g ~ S.llaa county and is placed in
; ,ns o" a. nc nth hs in called upop to an.
Jar tho Indictment in the district court of
H.. nonntv and niesds in Abatement the
,'an%sncv of Inc indictu,en In Ellis county,
p.SSu .,is o,ra,t theyennder.
an MI. o onnrt Maid at the last Galveston
az, snch a ulea could not be i..ter-
,nsaa Az piea being ovsrruled
ana 70 rial and convicted He is carried
T,',s w ,o,,ntv and there p,acsd ON trial
I ,na ,sms offence. when he pleads autre-
10. on,v;ct Shall ne be told that his plea
aS ali mt avail him, and that he must be
,risd cnnvcted and punished twics for the
49, tbai,o Eyarv principle OF right and
t t,' sIe,, ,s, swsr these nuestiors i'm tha
iu1'0 Ia, ~ "''
| M. c,oo l,diA c-urts have jnrisdicli1G
t,heIt--tSe i,,r,sdiction ia gorCnrrailt
:. - s,,,,,,s, Nh. in these casa, against
~. ~, .'tnsiI III me CRY attorney of DtIas,
! y; Wv c n' f.iis. v,is5ont e,ilu,i6U vtth. OF
.,i.nort i.erh on th. psrs o: the appellant.
IA irsi,itnlsd theee pfnseau Ions again Vt
Inraoll. ot' no (aprtlauO could not, uG0,T
- iec,s51 u CAV. s,on term, nave ints,
.oIpG IF nrssecutloos Tor the saIno oft rsos,
oI'..' ,h ~. the,r,cJlcal rgsult 70 rim
49, ~ 80 Isa1 fgn convictions and
,,,;sb Int Tor the ssme obgua, u cat eff
a. 'i' ''i,, ri ,9rr,sr c,nyictiou.
a. o., '- czsrr that the county 81
verv clearly and coeeptiy
,,,,r.r,5 d, HE oqtop, ana that too by
l...iI.tsagc Iudsea Of tie uost excellent
C..5 l5rtwa b.lisye that undsr our
L..,,,.s ,,ceiure aud constitution OF The
"'',''' r'su 6GrIriL.. 10 this stato Is
800, ~ IA .iioos ths pien of ,1rmer cen.
VIZ. ' a--",,f,tst unoar tns ,.b,ys state
VI 49, a. c15na In opnellant's plea of priv.
Ii, rt1eIg {G7, PC. provides tnet,
e..