The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1884-12-20

| DEC. 1.-THE Geser Manufacturing Company
&C., Vs. Epraim B. Almony judgment fol
| plaintiff for $191.96. VIM. Fuller & Co. Vs. A. s.
| Carman ; judgment for plaintiff for $l71.10. T.
| A. Hart VS.. David Burkhard; judgment for
| plaintiff for Sl74.6S. John Coleman VS.. Augustus
| Creaghan agreed. Samuel w. Brinker VS.. L.
F. Kilchenstein ; judgment for plaintiff for S437
John W. Cooper, executor, &C., We. Conrad J.
Kirschner and VIM. Ensor; judgment for plain
tiff for $16S.90. Geo. F. Sloan Bro. VS.. Charles
| w. Bentley judgment for plaintiff for Sl44.84.
| Skinner d Co. VS.. Elizabeth Nitzell; judgment
for plaintiff for $234.9S. John W. Cooper, execu-
tor, &C., Hezekiah Best Miller; ON trial before
| jury.
DEC. 15-In the equity case of John B. Miller
vs.. Franklin Kone, exceptions to the ratification
| of sale of the mortgaged premises made by John
| Hannibal, the attorney named in the mortgage,
| Judge Fowler has filed an opinion sustaining the
| second exception, and setting the sale aside with
costs to exceptant. The Judge says that the re-
port of the sale states the notice. &C., to have been
| given by advertisement in the Maryland Journal,
| according to the terms of which notice the sale
| therein mentioned was to have been made by the
MORTGAGE, whereas it was in reality made by the
attorney, and there was no evidence of notice
given by him. Besides, he failed to state in his
report the name of the purchaser, which would
have been fatal In the equity case of the Safe
Deposit and Trust Company, trustee and guardian,
VS.. Mary G. Albert and Fanny T. Albert, infants,
bill for the sale of certain property of the infants
Judge Fowler overruled the exceptions of Adah
2. Warfeld, and ratified the sale made by Robert
Baldwin, trustee, to Talbot j. Albert at the price
of $500. The exceptions were to the effect that
exceptant had an agreement with the trustee for
the purchase of the property; that the trustees
bond was defective, and that the property was
improperly bought by the guardian. The court
held that the agreement in question, being with
the trustee, could not be enforced, especially in
prejudice of the infants rights that the bond
was defective, and the court would require an ad-
ditional bond to be filed by the trustee; and,
lastly, that the purchaser was only guardian ad
Item. Moreover, the price paid by him for the
property was greater than that offered by cxcep-
tant. National Marine Bank of Baltimore VS..
Benjamin S. Woolston; judgment waE extended for
$2S5.42 and costs.
DEC. 16.-John W. Cooper, executor of Heze-
kiah Best Miller, before reported verdict for de-
PENDANT and judgment for defendant for costs.
Same vs.. same and Pleasant Hunter verdict and
judgment as above. Albert Gottschalk, use of
johnson and Glenn, vs.. VIM. A. Mackinson ;
judgment for plaintiff for S46O.44. Joseph L..
Duncan ct al VS.. Charles, William and Eliza J.
Goodwin; judgment for plaintiff as against VIM.
Goodwin for the property described in the declara
ton, one cent damages and costs. Mary Pocock
VS.. John c. Bosley and VIM. II. Todd Judgment
for plaintiff by confession terms to be filed
John L. Ensor VS.. John A. Bolgiane; removed to
the Circuit Court for Howard county Milton W.
Ofutt VS.. Sarah A. Spicer; case docketed by
consent and Judgment for plaintiff by confession
for 1920. The regular assignment of the civil
docket was concluded.
DEC. Nv. Whitelock Co. VS.. Henry N.
Merryman; judgment extended for plaintiff for
$104.O7. VIM. E. Hooper & Sons vs. John Ed
wards, administrator, &c; judgment extended
for plaintiff for S133.9S. Mary Steitz vs.. Lena
Schley and Henry Koch off. In the equity case
of John G. Erdman VS.. Benjamin and Susannah
Martin and Catherine Erdman, the court has
passed decree directing the respondents to bring
into court ON before January 90, 1885, the sum
of $500, to be paid over to complainant, with in
terest from June "a, 1882, and costs on failure
of which John +. Centrum and N. C. Burke are
appointed trustees to sell the property mentioned
in the proceedings for the purpose named. The
criminal docket will be taken up, peshaps, after
the holidays. The grand jury has already found
forty two overwhelmingly minor offences
Dec. 1S.-Joseph Kaufman & Sons VS.. William
II. II. Levine and Benedict Marteste pleaded
guilty to the sale of liquor on Sunday, and were
each fined $50 and costs. John N. Carroll VS.. Ed
ward Smyser and Michael Schal; action of dam
ages; on trial before jury. (The defendants in
this case leased from the plaintiff, Mr.. Carroll, a
tract of woodland for the purpose of cutting down
aud saving up the timber thereon for lumber
The plaintiff claims that the sawdust from the
defendants mill has polluted certain ofhis streams
of water courses to render the water unfit
for its former and ordinary uses. Hence the
suit.)