The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1884-11-14
GRAND JURY,

uoolSe hoSefs, Or,
AT the call of the docket the following entries
were made:
Jos. NJ. Simmons VS.. John E. Brney; stet.
VIM. Young and Stump for plaintiff h. W.
Archer for defendant.
JAS. W. Upton VS.. b. f. Stamford; stet.
Stump and VIM. Young for plaintiff VanBbber
for defendant.
James Cochran VS.. John Cadwalader; stet.
VIM. Young for plaintiff, Fl. w. Archer and
Farnands for defendant.
Edward II. Frazier vs.. JOS A. Coale stet
STREET. aid Archer IL VanBibber for plaintiff
Daniel f. Lynch vs.. Baltimore and Delta
Railway Co.; ste. VIM. Young for plaintiff .
w. Archer and VanBibber for defendant
Louis Cahen VS.. Henry G. Johnson's garnlsh-
ees; judgment condemnation nisi. Maynadier
for plaintiff, Archer " VanBibber for defen
dants.
Henry Z. Lntner VS.. Jacob f. Bull and wife
agreed Dozen and VIM. Young for plaintiff,
Williams and Street, for defendants,
Tate, Muller u Witichen VS.. c. L. Heck
judgment confessed. VIM. Young for plaintiff,
Maynader for defendant.
|. e. Mat news and wife VS.. A s. Parlimeut /;
stet. ii. w, Archer and Stump for plaintiffs.
John Dubois VS.. Jos. NJ. Simmons; Judgment
for plaintiff, Hopkins for plaintiff.
Isaac Z. Brown VS.. Frances I. Foy Judgment
for plaintiff.
Hartford Natioal Bank of Bel Air VS.. James A.
McCommons and Albert T. Lonn Judgment
confessed. Williams for plaintiff, Gilbert for
defendants.
Same VS.. Bennett Osborn Judgment confess.
ed Same counsel.
j. Ii. Theimyer d Co., vs.. Walter S. and VIM
Maxwell; Judgment confessed. Wilson for
plaintiffs, Gilbert for defendants.
Same VS.. Dawson d Roberts; Judgment BY
default Wilson for plaintiffs
Henry l.. Taylor VS.. Thomas and Patrick
Moran; judgment confessed for S5S SIS. II. w.
Archer, DR., for plaintiff, NanBibber for defen-
dants.
Hood, Bonbright II Co., vs. Robert Seneca ::
agreed. II: W. Archer, Jr., for plaintiffs, Hop
kins for defendant.
j. II. Theimyer u Co, VS.. g. S. Armstrong; ;
judgment confessed. Wilson for plant ifs, viii
lams for defendant.
J. II. Theimyer u Co. VS.. John E Hopkins
IL Bro. judgment Stump for plaintiffs Archer
IL VanBibber for defendants.
John F. Brown VS.. A. s. Parliment Il Co.'S,
garnisheesi Judgment condemnation nisi. VIM.
Young for plaintiff.
Samuel W. Miller VS.. same; judgment con-
domination nisi. Robinson for plaintiff
John NJ. Macklen VS.. same Judgment Rob
inson for plaintiff.
Robert o. Mitchell vs. same Judgment. Wm
Young and Stump for plaintiff.
Robert N Glasgow VS. s. j. Scarborough {;
judgment by default. VIM Young for plaintiff.
judgment by default. Wilson for plaintiffs.
Cook u Bernheimer vs.. b. Dunngan; judg-
ment. Stump and Harlan u Webster for plain
tiffs.
The case of Johu II. Lee VS.. VIM. s. Bulett,
being an action for trespass, began on Tuesday,
the jury bringing in verdict in favor of plaintiff
| for So IS.
Henry w. Archer, trustee, VS.. c. H. Herring
u Son; judgment. Ii. W. Archer, Jr., for
plaintiff
VIM. Gladden's Ex'x VS.. Shadrach Dorsey :;
judgment confessed for S4S4. Hopkins for
plaintiff, Young tor defendant.
VIM. G. Codd VS.. Joseph w. Butler; tried be-
| fore the COURT verdict and judgment for plain
tiff for $lll.n. Stump for plaintiff, Farnandis
| and Robinson for defendant.
Sarah P Rasin VS. Michael Boyd; Judgment
by default. Williams for plaintiff.
Lineaweaver u Co. vs.. Geo. E. and Martha
NJ. Gilbert; judgment confessed. Stump for
| plaintiffs, Wilson for defendants.
Jas A. Wiles vs.. Dennis Hines and Geo. F.
Preston; judgment confessed. Gilbert for
plaintiff, Archer d VanBibber for defendant.
Edward Renneberg VS. Frank A. Lee judg-
ment by default for 1914 80. Stump for plaintiff.
John 7. Harkins VS.. VIM. II. Jones and Eliza
A. Davis; Judgment by default. Archer 81
VanBibber for plaintiff.
Reading Iron Works VS.. VIM. Fl. Brundige /;
Judgment by default Williams for plaintiff.
VIM. A. Cook VS.. Joshua Bond ct. al. judg-
ment by default. Archer q YanBibber for
plaintiff.