New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-09-18
Try rsLG1R,rI - rHE rRtRuNsl

KNOWN ~ wAsHINGToN, WHETHER sIAlED -
LETTERS OR orHERwIsE.
Try rELE 3gNPI rD TIE rRrBUvsl
WAsUrNGrov. Sept. ibid Governor Clevean'
favor the Morrison BILL and was that fact com
municated to shay Democratic Representatives ron
NcwYork with the vicw Of inducing them to support
ii Governor Cleveland says he wrote no letters u
congressman TO influence their action on 'arh meas
uros or LEGISLATION" lie seems to have been taught
caution by the result Of his Grady letter. but INC
writing of letters was not the only way in which the
Democratic Governor of he Empire state VINO was
ALA, the most formidable candidate for the Presidential
nomination. could exert apoweriul mtlucnc" upon 'n'
action Of Democratic Representative. from that state
Tho .imp knowledge of the fact that he desired the
pa..ape of tho Morris bill-tha " first firm -tel
toward free trade would of itself have great WcAu'
with Democratic Representatives. Imt "9N'lhol
Cleveland did so desire waa secret n W a-hhg'"U
last spring The House WIS very evenly dlNlu'u on "n
the bin. In the Democratic cauou. lac d ON MlI'n -
fifty seven Democrat. including Hardy oi N'W- toih
voted against bringing n forward at all ANA on AP'i
H. thrty-uiuc Democrats. including Hardy. ot New
York. voted against IT. considerations Whlch was
carried boy q majority of hlrely two Notc'.
I'm such condition of affairs she tcc-ua''r' 'ou','
afford to leave no stone uuurucd. uo influence unused
Mr. lurd aud others worked day and night 90 WIN oN'l
Democrat. who hnd voted ag!in't them or VINO n n'u
&" dodrrd" Nir lluuI went To- New (ork once or tVh'
dnrino the struggle ao dd Mr. por'h'imrr Both ol
iheiu ,a we'll ~ NpcalNr Carlisle nud chairman
Mnfrialu undoubtedly know JUST Nh'I' ''''N '''','
Cleveland sond and mndo thc h'at u'r oi thit know
,dcr In a dispatch t.uW Chicago, puhh'hcd M ~
Irmr\r oi Jul, e. b found the following luo
Western and southern ttc trudcr7 hnd o." hut WIN
tlr,rlitd ou thc tuh question, A7 Congressman -
ilurd todn, remarked III Ncv7 respecting the llril
nr AN thut or nuy other urin fcionrt cnuld desire
llr approved o., Morrison hill, aud s with ~, hhi
the question i- eau hc carry Nev-l lork Mt llWl
wa. strongly opposed to Cleveland nomination. but
generously gave HIM credit for hi- free twdc view 70
which. Mr.. uurd -uid are all that or any other
ti.IN rcformcr could DESIRE Everybody know.
whether or NOT M llurd ;, trce-iradcr.
II has been mentioned that iu caucus ~ wei a. on
the question Of consideration, Mr. Hardy, II NrW-l ok,
voted against thc Morrison bill The latter yot- wa7
given April 10. On May q. exactly three week,
later Oh the motion % XIII the bill, Mr.. Hardy voted
in ;hc negative. and William +. Robinson, Who had
voted against consideration was absent. Ii l. possible
that Nj Hardy i. the New-No ork Representative al
luded to a Nh Ncl-ou- letter published ID yesterday
THIRt-NI. rs one Ncw-iorS member whose cnanec oi
no .ifiou O.. wa. due to Mr. ClcycaI d. influence.
4 welliuiorucd Democrat. who was ON intimate terms
with Sneaker Carlisle aAd the frcc-radc lcdd'rs last
winter asserts. ou the contracf, that the man mo
changed lis vote consequence OF Goyerh0t 'lcNe-
land. influence was hr. stevens, OF the AAAl,t DIS
t,ieL lIc states that the Congressman referred To- H
Mr. Nc,on'- letter a- having made the statement that
Governor Cleveland had written letters 20 New-l ork
Cougrc-s Wa, Mr.. Dor Aclmcl.