Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1884-05-21
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.

TUESDAY, May 10th.
942s-Sawyer ct al. VS.. Sargent-order re-
775e-Rigo VS.. Van Pelt-Judgment affirmed
The Court.
s006-Doolittle ct ais VS. Woodstock ct ais
Order affirmed. The Court.
S003-Balger VS.. Foss-Judgment and order at
firmed. The Court.
9435-Schuyler VS.. Broughton, Sherif-Judg-
ment and order reversed and cause remanded,
with directions to the Court below 10 sustain the
demurrer TO the complaint. The Court.
9isl-Broughton VS.. County of Santa Barbara
Judgment reversed The Court.
7953-Estate of Feeley-0rdered reversed and
new trial granted. The Court
The San Joaquin Valley Bank VS.. Bours-
Judgment and order reversed and cause re-
manded for a new trial. Ross, J. We concur ::
Mckee, j.; Mckinstry J.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
TUESDAY, May 10Th
Court met pursuant to adjournment; Present,
Mckinstry, j., presiding; Ross, j.. Mckee, j.:
Mccarthy, Clerk Finkler Bailitf.
A72-Heath ct al. VS.. Scott-Submitted by ap-
pellant on his points and authorities on file.
Perreira VS.. Central Pacific Railroad Com
pany-By consent. respondent allowed twenty
days to file briefs. appellant twenty days to re-
ply: cause to be thereon submitted.
S550-Packard VS.. Johnson-By consent, re-
spOndent allowed ten days to file brief appel
liant fifteen days to reply; cause to be thereon
submitted
S55l-Packard VS. Moss-Upon the suggestion
of the death of the defendant and respondent
herein, on motion of Hail for appellant, ordered
that Edward II. Jack and Frank T. Baldwin
executors, etc, be substituted as defendant and
respondents on the record herein By consent
respondent allowed ten days to file brief appel
liant fifteen days 10 reply; cause TO be thereon
submitted.
S6l6-Stretch VS.. Taimadge-By consent, sub
mitted on points and authorities on file.
S666-Brannock VS.. Monroe ct al-Submitted
on points and authorities on file.
S699-Talmadge VS.. Stretch - Submitted on
points and authorities on file
gl2S-Brown VS.. Stockton and COpperopolis
Railroad Company-On motion of Dudley for
appellant, ordered dismissed.
y003-ketchum vs.. superior Court of Sacra-
mento County-Submitted on points and author
tiles on file.
9O29-Smyth vs. stockton and Copperopolis
Railroad Company-Submitted on points and
authorities on file.
9d63-Estate of Crozier, deceased-Submitted
on points and authorities on file.
Adjourned Tor the session.
IN BANK.
91lS-Robinson VS.. Placerville and Sacramento
Valley Acknowledgement and order affirmed.
The Court.
10,92S-People vs. Bennett-Judgmen and or
der affirmed. Sharpstein J. We concur: My
rick, j.; Thornton, J. l concur i'll the Judgment
Ross J.
therefor, ordered that appellant be allowed
thirty days to file transcript on appeal. McKin-
stry, j.. Thornton, j.; Myrick, j.; Sharpstein, j.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
TUESDAY, May 10Th.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
Thornton, j., presiding Myrick, j., Sharpsteln
j.: Williams. Deputy Clerk; keWen, Ballltf.
q09O-BaSlir vs.. Brown-On motion of LOutitt
for appellant, ordered the appeal herein be and
the same is hereby dismissed.
9ll9-Estate of Crozier, deceased-On motion
Of Loutitt for respondent, ordered that appellant
be allowed twenty days to file brief respondent
twenty days to reply; cause TO be thereon sub
mitted.
gl4:-Moore Il Co. vs.. Kerr ct al.-On motion
of LOutitt for respondent, ordered that cause be
submitted on briefs on file
gll5-Estate of CroMer, deceased-Same order
9l52-Sharp vs.. Blankinship-On motion of
Hall for appellant. ordered that appellant be
allowed twenty days TO file brief respondent
twenty days to reply; cause to be thereon sub
mitted.
92l3-Saisbury ct al vs. Brown-On motion of
Loutitt for respondent, ordered that cause be
submitted on points and authorities on file.
93l4-Watrous Us. Cmningham-Same order.
g257-Jack ct al vs.. Saunders ct al.-Samc or
der.
gii5-Estate of Brennan-Same order.
976-Bank of California vs.. Dunn-Argued by
McKune for appellant. benson for respondent.
Ordered that respondent be allowed twenty days
to file brief appellant twenty days to reply;
cause to be thereon submitted.
9i49-Capital Savings Bank vs.. CrOnkite-On
motion of Beatty for appellant, respondent con-
senting cause ordered submitted on briefs on
file
9505-Reclamation District No. , vs.. Goldman
argued by Gordon for appellant, McKune for
respondent Ordered that respondent be allowed
ten days 10 file brief, appellant ten days to re-
ply; cause to be thereon submitted.
9l22 9l23- Eureka Lake IL Y. c. Co. VS.. SUI
perior Court of Yuba COunty-On motion of
Byrne for petitioner herein, ordered that petit
toner be allowed twenty days to file brief, re-
spOndent twenty days to reply, cause to be
thereon submitted; and further ordered that ].
X. Byrne he allowed to withdraw record for eX
animation.
9536-People ex rel. Callahan vs.. Greenlaw-
Argued by Freeman for respondent, submitted
on briefs on file for appellant.
9526-Estate of Billings-Argued by Scanniker
and McKune for appellant and Beatty for re-
spondent. Appellant allowed ten days to file
brief, respondent ten days to answer; cause to
be thereon submitted.
Adjourned until 10 4, NJ. tomorrow.