, 1884-04-05

'N0A WIN ~ NNAS AAA0AN ANAAAeSA ENSAN w Nv
made heavier in the one quarter than in
the other, and by our proposal that the
words in the Danish, "etter de SaaledeS
indkomne Udkast" be altered to "paa
Grundiag at de indkomne UdkaSt" it is
intended more clearly to point out that
the respective Authorities shall take the
necessary consideration i'll that respect.
dd s 10 ito be altered to s 49,.
Gd 5 II Ito be altered to s IA.
In lines 3 to 10, the words "shall be
held ........... .interveneS' to be altered
to: takes place, to be held for every quar-
ter by 2 Members of the Road Commission
and 2 Road Inspectors, all of whom are
appointed for the purpose by the Chairman
OF the Commission and must be residents
OF another Quarter. IN line II, the words
"OficerS Of the Quarter" to be altered to:
the Member of the Commission for the Quar-
ter etc.
In lines 13 to Is the words "the inspec-
ton .........C Commissions" to be altered
to: inspection; he is entitled to point out
defects, but has no vote III the deci-
sion.
INSTEAD Of s 5 u and 10
the following is proposed as 5 10: When
defects in the road-work are discovered by
the inspection, there shall be given the
holder Of the allotment, who is, moreover,
liable to penalty under ! "A, a suitable
tenn, within which he is to have the defects
Temedied. Should he find himself aggrirv-
Ell by the deci ION Of the inspectors, he
may within s days demand a re-inSpectiOn,
which is effected by the Road-C Commission
with exception of the two Members, who
had taken part i'll the first inspection, and
at which the party shall eventually be
given the further necessary term. The
decision Of the re-inspection settles the
matter.
If the defects are not remedied at
the expiration of the term, the Road
Commission shall, on the report from the
inspectors III case no re-inSpectiOn has been
held, have the work done at the expense
of the concerned party. The expenses for
that purpose inclusive "fSuch remuneration
for the controlling Member as may be fixed
by the Superior Authority on the repre-
senta. ion of the Commission, are to be
intOrced by levy unless the holder of the
allotment alledgeS that the work is not
incumbent on him, that the a~bovementlOn-
ed term had not been given him, or he
advances any other similar objection, In
which case the decision shall be given
under a public police suit, instituted
against him.
Besides the alterations Of these enact
mentS resulting from the above proposed
mOditiCa ions IN the organisation OF the
control with the ROad work, the Committee
has especially found recommendable, i'll
keeping with the enactmentS in the Law
for Denmark dated DIST June 1861 5 9, to
propose a rule for the protection of the
holder of a road allotment in the event OF
his having other objections to make to the
decision given by the Co mission, beyond
such as relate to the state of the road Ill
question. Such instances will, it is true,
practically not be of frequent occurrence,
but may occur. The first instance special
ly named in the proposed section might
thus, Notwithstanding the rules III 3 (now
~ Of the Draft, occur where there are
doubts az TO who is owner at the moment
of the estate in question; and the rule
would also find application when the
allotment should prove to he private rOad
-an instance of this kind has actually
OccurU dor when the tenn prescribed Ill
The section had lot been allowed the par.
ty, or in other similar cases. We have
found the more reason TO provide TINS
expediont, as the Road Commission may,
according to its formation, be without
legal aid.
The Committee does not consider it
necessary that the Road Commission shall
fix a daily hlr for neglects, considering
that the work under all circumstances
will be done after the expiration OF thu
term allowed, and we consider it on the
whole not desirable that the Road Commits.
sion should have to do with the inhictlng
of fines; questions i'll that respect may, at
@Ia raouoSt nf fhp Road. Commission. U0