Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1884-05-14
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.
DEPARTMENT ONE


MONDAY, May 18th
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
| McKinstry, j., Mckee, J., Ross, j.; Leake Deputy
Clerk Rinkler, Bailif.
92l9-Estate of Curtis-Argued by Freeman foI
appellant, Hanlon for respondent and Edgerton
I for Harvey T. Curtis. Edgerton allowed twenty
days to file briefs and appellant twenty days &c
/ reply: cause TO be then submitted
9i2l-Biggerstaff VS., Briggs-Argued by Ball
| for appellant and Treadwen for respondent and
! submitted.
9i52-Moore VS.. Clear Lake Water works-On
motion of Treadwe1 for respondent and upon
| filing suggestion of death OF James Moore re-
! spondent herein, it is ordered that Mary 4.
| Moore. eXecutrix of the late will and testament
| of James Moore, deceased be substituted as re-
| spondent herein in place of said James Moore.
! deceased. Argued by Fox for appellant and
Treadwell for respondent, and submitted.
! 9500-Bayne vs. Kripp-Argued by Ball for
/ appellant, Treadwell for respondent and sub
l0,926-People vs. Acknowledgements and order
reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
McKinstry, J. Concurring opinion, Ross J. I
Adjourned until 10 A. NJ. tomorrow.
TUESDAY, May 18th
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
McKinstry, j., presiding; Mckee. y. Ross, j..
Leake Deputy Clerk Finkler, Bailif.
912i-Reed VS.. Rohm ct al-Argued by Tread
well for appellant and Ball for respondent, and
submitted.
9S4e-Wilson Us. Barnard & Co. ct al.-By con-
Sellt, OTueTeu submitted OH DrieIS on HE. Oll
motion of appellant, and suggestion of the
death of ;. c. Farnham. one of the appellants
herein, ordered that f. c. Farnham. the execu-
tor of the estate of 5. c. Farnham, deceased be
substituted in place and stead of said s. c. Farm
ham, deceased
9i60-Taylor VS.. Bidwen ct al-AIgued by
Lusk for respondent; no appearance for appel
liant. Motion OF Lusk for respondent to have
judgment affirmed upon the ground of non
appearance OF appellant and no points on file,
submitted.
9i95-Harrison VS.. Spring Valley H NJ Co.
Argued by Riordan for appellant and Lusk for
respondent, and submitted.
9i9S-Dayys. Cohen-On motion of T. c. Lusk,
cause ordered submitted upon briefs now on file.
Adjourned until 10 \. ". tomorrow.
IN BANK.
SATURDAY, May 10th.
S350-Bennett VS.. City and County of san
Francisco = Judgment and order affirmed.
Myrick, J. We concur: Sharpstein, j., Morri-
son, c. j., Ross, J.
acknowledgement and order affirmed The Court.
MONDAY, May 18th
937l-Cummings VS.. Conlan-0rdered placed
at foot OF calendar. Department Two, Wednes-
People vs.. Dwyer-Assigned 10 Department
Two.
745S-santa Cruz Railroad Company vs. spreck-
els = Filed dissenting opinion. Thornton, J.
Concurring, Mckee, j., Myrick, J.
Partridge vs. Owens 940S-Patridge VS.. Shep-
herd 940i-Patridge VS.. Shepherd-The death
of plaintiff, Peter J. Partridge, having been duly
suggested, il is hereby ordered, on motion of f.
\. and q. L. Lawrence, attorneys for plaintiff,
that Antoine Borel, executor of the estate of said
deceased besubstituted as plaintiff in each ofthe
above-entitled causes in place and stead of said
Peter g. Partridge, deceased. The Court.
LaWlOr VS.. Luxforth-Upon reading and filing
the foregoing affidavit, and good cause being
shown therefor il is ordered that the appellant
herein be allowed twenty days additional time
in which 10 file and serve transcripts on appeal
herein Myrick, j., Sharpstein, j., McKinstry
j., Mckee, J.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
MONDAY May 18th
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
Thornton j., presiding Myrick, j., sharpstein
j.; Williams, Deputy Clerk: Kewen, Bailiff.
9l22 and 9l23-Eureka Lake Il \. c. Co VS.
Superior Court Of lnba county-on motion of
Wallace, for plaintiff, ordered that cause be
continued until Tuesday, May Goth, and further
ordered that attorney for plaintiff be allowed to
withdraw record for examination.
g39S-NllcoXsOn vs. Stritt-Argued by Tread
well for appellant and Belcher for respondent.
Ordered that appellant be allowed twenty days
to file briefs; cause TO be then submitted
95?5-Dayidson VS.. Devine On motion of
Davidson, for respondent, appellant consenting,
ordered that the appeal herein be and the same
is hereby dismissed.
9506-DavidsOn VS.. Decentralization to dismiss
appeal argued by Davidson for respondent and
Gale for appellant Ordered that the appeal
herein be and the same is hereby dismissed
without prejudice
932i-lilatt vs.. Board OF school directors, etc
On motion of Sanborn, for respondent, ordered
that the cause be submitted on briefs on file.
Adjourned until 10 \. N. tomorrow.
People VS.. DwyeT-Ordercd that this cause
stand submitted on briefs TO be filed; twenty
five days to appellant; respondent twenty-five
days to reply. Cause TO abide the decision Of
the case eX parte Walthers, now pending il this
Court. The Court.
TUESDAY, May 18th.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present,
Thornton j., presiding; Myrick, j., Sharpstein,
j.; Williams, Deputy Clerk Kewen, Bailiff.
Si53-Mofiitt vs.. Cook-Motion denied. The
Court.
gO7l-People vs. Hager-Continued for the ses-
sion
9a16-Williams vs.. Benicia Water Works-Sub-
mitted ON briefs on file.
92sS-Mannor vs.. Davis-Argued by Alberry
for appellant, Blanchard for respondent and
submitted.
9i17 and 940s-Spect VS. Hager-Argued by Al
berry for appellant and Bayne and Belcher for
respondent, and submitted.
Adjourned until 10 4. NJ. tomorrow =