The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1884-06-06
CAsEOPJolls q, EMO.
Tho Grand Jury ~ Montreal Couside

Tho brand Jury NJ M0ntFeni Consider,
tug Charges Against tue Prisoner. NJ
NEw foaE, June 5.-The Rov. Father
Doacey, who was with John @. Emo, the
deiaultlng preslden. oil the Second National
Bank, whom no was arrested, was in
Canada on busins.s visit, and merely
happened to meet Emo there. Ha did no.
leave with him, and va, In no sense bis
companion Of travel. Fathsr Doucey Is
now in Montreal. gS5 ,!.,,s,' ~,
The interest In Euo's Gaze at Quebec 70.
mains lively. When be was arrested on a
Montreal warrant The prisoner and bis
friends denied that he had brough. any
stolen money whatever in Canada, His
lawyer, Il Is alleged, procured him little
on advising him to leave New, York, and
the balance Of that found about him was
lent him, It is said, by Father Doucsy. The
sum found on Emo was about $500. o.
ascending the bench Judge Chauveau a.ked
the Grown counHellorB II they were prepared
10 proceed with the prosecution. Mr., Pal.
letter said the Grown felt It's duty to be 10
watch the care and see that Justice was
done both 10 the prisoner and to tho prose.
c1tion. AS proceedings were taken In the
name Of the Queen, It was nece@ary for
the Grown to lead the inquiry; but be do.
sired It to be we'll understood that no wit.
nesses would be summoned by the Crown
unless their names were indicated and sup.
piled BY the private prosecution. He
would like TO know II counsel for the
prosecution had any Witnesses ready. E
The Court ruled that as the case before
1t IVES 1.-THE QIeen vs. Eco" the Court
should only recogniz, the CROWN as prose.
cutting. Private parties 70 tho prosecu.ion
mrs. advise with and aslist the Grown.
Mr. Davidson, q O., for the Second
National Bank Of New York, said there
were no witnesses In Quebec for the
prosecution; the witnessss werein Montreal
and be was prepared 10 proceed there
before the magistrate who iss1ed the
warrant OF before the Terminal Court OF
Queens Bench now sitting there. lie could
not see any justification Tor o refusal to
have the prisoner taken to Montreal before
the Justice who issued the warrant for bis
arrest. A=I@s '-tF''t 7'''-9
The judge cited authority for tho deten-
ton Of the prisoner by tho magistrate back.
Ing the warrant, and referred to the pe.u.
liar TACT OIL FaheJ . absence, who had sworn
to facts In Montreal upon which Emo was
arrts.ed. ~ - s'r 20 ~! i:2 ~
The private prosecution having demand.
ed q pcstponement Of the case till 'yes:er.
day, Judge Irvine wanted TO be assured
that witnesses would be there then, and
that the opposing counsel would be
prepared to procesd. Mr.. Davidson
refused 10 give any aEsurance, and
Mr.. Irvine, contendipg that II
was uselets wss.e oil time to con-
tinue fsctious proceedings any longer
moved for the discharge Of the prisoner.
This application was refused and the court
decided that 1t could not be granted, but
that the prisoner should be remanded till
tomorrow, when the ciss should proceed,
WITNESSES or no witnesse,. = d
Meanwhile 1t was understood that Fahay
hal gone to Montreal 10 lay his information
against Eco before the Grand Jury, when,
IL trus bill DO returned, nothing but force
can prevent his removal to Montreal. 81