New-York tribune., 1884-11-26
TIE MAYORS LATEST VETO.
w,ss sA,n ABOUT IT YESTERDAY.

.x srprAcp PEOPLE, CHARGE THE
w,yoR WIN rAvomNa THE CABLE schtMf"
,,a w.,,r's second veto of the measure granting
.hs ronscnt vi the city authorities 10 INV, ,hS uu was
~ s,s.ob Sbarps broadway Surface kaiiroW was
.hs suhiect OF discussion among those s,,
,rs,s,,iav Tie piopeiN-owncrs III broa.WW" ~" ,,n
about evenly dveu ,SiaJ on , q" that ,horcushiare
tvens generally who have no espevia, ,",a
she matter were impressed, by the % arn"s' W.rnncm
nle lam in lower Broadway yesterday Wy ,..ahs =
Nth ,he beiirI that with tailioad care anu ,iacns -
Ga Tho s,r,t IL would be absolutely nnpasea"mM M ,s ss
cc,tain hca,s o The day ne Ahs,nss AS,h The measure
stsi h.,,,ur a law IN spite oft the Mayors YWet,-
stWs we,r not mcl,ned to talk urcn rcnt,ts t,m,t e
aas ,,s1raW, weie pleased With the check nl.sn
90 iaenh S6arr's pad, whle those thteieeleu w w
ia,ier wefe odaroken IN ,heit eohdemne'''" w '"e
"nnV "n,a isS, Ne ,epcrtcN Osborn !, hgsht ecnn
sel lar tho ilioaawaS sn,iae" ka't"a" 'e"'"N'
taal s-.,... ,.,,,,,, c,o,.
MANY M r,uoeoieA enreN lrom the eaelo vNr.ninS
ins New SoTk tNhle ia'i,naa a""tan, ,s s eou,se
Nil tnroush has heen that ot partisan VI ,"s % u", a, An
,ercs ms recon! ', h. 10 So ,o DELAY il hS was
..r. he va. hound to accept Julee ilo ,,, a.,
, , rnk o"mplian 'c with the judges ORDER anu tno
,on,ions ne atmg the percentages on s'"ss
before ther adoption. II The Mayor was actns
.inpv Ia the public interest he wnnhi pave p,o Si,h
d.. i,sf "a the turpoatiou Counsel was satishcu WIZ,
ae HarIetl's action; for It would be evident 10 the
.,uh,c that every legitimate oilttt OF tuc
,,nel Ills veto Il frivolous III IL 1 ,"su w. w.
insist iha maps and plans and speeiiications sno m
ou cd hv the Aldermen for two straight hheS W no
r,,n e H.tery Union square lie calms n"' !, y, =,
,,nlv Lv "A strained construction OF TIE law "i 1853 na,
,hr co,nuon Council could Icg,iie the company 40 Pa
SO 600 a wear to the city In addition TO taxes r9
now arguing that point, II is cnough 10 say ~ .'.
I.rcit. order In express tcrmsr rccogilcu !he.i
,ra,,r, couaid, ration compensation ihc va! -,
accts that the condition imposing forfeiture VI .o
cornorsc franchises applies Only to failure 10 pay ,r
required percentages and. not to default 'i INC i"
rent 10 ohv ,ous euouc cl
when van refer To The law ana lind that IL cNpiess!
lmls forfeiture 10 default In the Hyneht d. tuc ii
cen;arcs 10 meet this Limitation and 10 secure tio p"s
MN, of the annual rental the Common oouci Hpuso
condition that bond should hc gwen 10 ne apptV'cu
hol ~ Ia form AMI suitclency Oi te sutet"H y
Julg. az the supreme Court IL WAS prupuscu ti' ,'
inni shonld he approved 10y the Corporation '".s'I
imI that gentleman preferred that the duty snouu nu
i,frusieI Io "A judge. Mayor EdsOns chleI Wrhl',,
tnro,phout has nusl airing sInder ei Mr. J,co.
sharp lie has rcsorcd To legal proceedings oly ~
i,sc Them and his arguments have been III ulrec' oP
rosnn to The adludicatiDns ot JUDGES Dnnoihe ail M
iIlarr,tL Ma,or Edison has purp0sely ovcrooAeu tie
fart that the Broldw Surface kairo"d Conla'y i'
,e,uired within siNty days L. enter INTO bh"s con
tfact to perform all the conditions oi the Ies'iI''
sd Ia say that e city will not he protected is I" a,set
that IL cannot enforce It's rights against parry VINO
nhundaniy able tu contract, ana tue performances VI
whose engagements Is to bc also amply secured