New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1884-12-23
s.lNsg AESsHAFII FgSTEI FfasEEEgF '''s '''
THE UEITBp sTATBs sVFRBMB GfVRF


The IjNIIBp STATES stRBBMb ~ WI:
WAsHIsGTps, pee. GA reelsi0n was Ie'i-
deysd hy the supreme Gaurt IS the nile STATES Ns'
IN the patent case VI The United states 'aiFWbp NN'N
many against the Union Mealic NaFtFiise bo'hp"N'
brought here ny appeal from the Crcu'l ppHFl W ~,
United States for the District OF Massachusetts lhe SUI
was brought BY the appellee against the appe"h' w "
legged infringement of rcissued patent upon "n 'p
ment In amachne for making percussion car'iuec
After the reissue OF the patent to the Union Metallic
Cartridge Company that company applied Tor an eAeh
sou which was opposed by the United States Carthage
Company the ground that the device consisting VI
fixed die and moving bunter, which was caiiheu W '
reissued patent new invention NOT SCI ior.n J."
original patent The Union Cartridge Company then hed
disclaimer OF this device whercupon the extension w
gransed Some time aferward the Union Cartridge Com
many brought this suit on the ground that the United
States Company was making machines which cohtaheo
the device referred to- This raised the quoso
the legal effect of the Union COmpanys disclaimer 1hs
court holds that the disclaimer so limits the
of the claims of the reissued patent that the appellants
machine cannot be held to infringe those claims Inc
decree OF the Circuit Court is reversed the Union Metal
lie Cartridge Company pay the costs OF both this ana
the appeal which also governed by TINS uecso
Opinion by Justice BlatchfOrd.
decision was also rendered in the patent case OF the
Torrent and Arms Lumber Company against Alexander
Rogers In error to Circuit Court OF the United States
brought by Rogers against the lumber company Tor al
legged infringement of ressucd patent OH an improved
machine for rolling saw logs. The court holds tha'
Rodgers the defendant in error has shown no cause Vi
action and that the court below should h.e o. %
ooiingy reversed with directions 10 grant new 'ra
Opinion by Justice Woods - .,o
Memphis and Little Rock Railroad Company as Ieorgan,
the Stale OF Arkansas In error the supreme Court OF
Arkansas The suit was brought by the railroad company
70 cnjOn the Board of Railroad Commissioners rom az
prasing for purposes taxation any part OF said railroad
company property on the ground that IL was chept
from taxation by contract with the STATE cohthhtu III
its charter Of incorporation This holds that the
exemption from taxation contained IN the ihcoiioIlhe
and Little Rock Railroad Company tho Original cor
poraton organized under that dih not piss py 'nr
purchasers at the judicial sae that the franchises con
tanned IN the conveyance were limited TO those WHICH
had been granted appropriate To the construction
manteicc and operation OF the railroad public high
way and the right 10 proht thcrcrom ana that ho up
peants not having become corporate body uhth h'o
The restrictions IN the constitution OF lsIA took co,
thereby rendered incapable IN law OF having o, Gu,
Joining the privilege Of holding In property exempt rom
TAXATION fhc decree OF the supreme Court OF Arkansas
liz therefore affirmed. Opinion ny justice Matthew ',
The further proceedings " the court we're M follows
No ilO-Chcsier Arthur late collector. planr In error
sg Julia Morgan In sr,or to @ os nav t% o1 ad az
nent affirmed with costa a,I interest f., o,ror M.
william M @."n " n Srro @n 10 o ,s 6"n on Of s
United states ior the southern District Of Illinois Judsmcn
No ii"IhS United saIes appellant, act, tho droM rals
Manuia turing company Appear 'e '""''"' '"'"'
ssI iau " H. Matthew. appellant. ns catch =,
Warner and others. Appeal The Circuit court or thr
United states for the District Of Ma"clu'c'n Decree
affirmed with costs. . A., ,,.,..,.,...
No i2i5John horncv appellant agt the United states
and, . ,,.,-.--,,- a.. 49,, A..
United states Advanced and asssns FOR second Mohup
In January a.. -. .,--..,-. 49,.
No 1927 jesseJ Murphy appellant agt Alexander Ram.
and others . . g.. . .,.--..,.-
40 io3S-I Ann N. rratt appellant agt Alexander
Ramsey and others and -
No. iOJU-Eien N Cawson and Others appellants act.
Alex itansev and others. Adv M Ell
No lS9 W. Fleet steele 3, use etc appellant agi the
United states. Submitted. .. . A. =.
i2u1-rhuuas itorrtt, plan,in IN e,ict act lo'o ~
lie aud others Motion TO amend wit ei ettoi s"
mited . 49,. ~. ...,,..., ............
pantinin eifUt ast charles " Idle submitted unief w"
M sTp-thp ,ipnfa naiitoan Company ~ rev iet'ey,
appellants act Alfred Mile aid vhtis submitted uhuei
Rfu tue, ....,,..,
NJ sin Ida a. iitAn admulsiin'ils ptrl appellant,
ap inland lloyd administrator etc, ana ohet Hnhhi''ei
uiiiui yum tue. A.. 49,, 49,. =. A.,
ipi anl ~. ...,. - ~, ., a.. ,t.,,., =. -.
hWbniitHh
Adjourned unil January =, ihhh,