, 1883-08-30
District Court Docket.
srPTEMBER TERM. 1889.

No 3Gg c. Mckay VS.. Matilda Douglas, et. al. :;
title TO land Nc Naught, Ferry, McNau sht "
Mitchell and c. NJ. bradshaw. attorneys for plain
tiff: STRIVE x Haines fordeft.
No ssI. j. q. Phinney, appellant, ". = !. w.
Harris. ex estate of y. Phinney, dec
3g4 Sherman HYDE X Co. vs.. T. 5. Nil Ter; at
law on account Mcknight, Ferry, &c for plain
tiff J. ~ Kuhn for deft. Ref to ii. NJ liza Her
40I. Annie VI. Connorvs. j. j. Cotrnori i'iVorcei :
G. VI. Hal!cr for pitt. Continued from March
term
4D3. j. Fitzpatrick vs.. j. j. Conner; at law on
promissory note. Kuhn & Burke for pltf. Con-
tinued.
A. Estate of A. Phinney, dec. For final set
tlement of acct. Mcknight Ferry, NC, for es-
tate.
Ii6. I. :. vs. Indictment; deft. moi ar
rested.
472. L. & 1. Weeks, eS. est. H. E Iutchings,
dec vs.. John Grady, at law on promissory note.
c. NJ. Bradshaw for pltf.. Kuhn " Burke for deft.
1856. Terr. vs.. McFIemiuri for escape L. NJ
Bradshaw, pros atty
5O6. " Meagher VS.. Z. d. Pullen, at law on
due bill SlOU. ID. ". Smith for pf- Petition
foT insolvency filed.
5i3. Washington Iron Works -. Il. W. Bu!-
lene and PIT T. Mill Co; foreclosure mechanics
lIciir S-I'po.to DuIh ~ iSiiSlh Hhu ~
for pltf., Struve IS Haines for Bullene, Bradshaw
& Jones and Jacobs & Jenner for Mil Co.
519. f. II. Leadbeattsr vs.. j. Leadbeatl er; d.
vorce. d. W. Smith for deft.
40. o. Flint W. A. Barlow; at law, damal 'es'
Bradshaw & Jones for pitt. Continued fro m
March term.
sas. Teri. vs.. wm. woodley; assault. Brad
shaw, pros, atty.
81 J. J. IIarbin VS.. VIM. Crawford; at law,
damages for criminal arrest. bradshaw & Jones
for ptf.
543 C. C. Bartlett and W. II. Stevens vs..
bktne. c. L. Taylor in admiralty for salvage.
Bradshaw Jones. proctors for lbellants. Ref TO
JAS. Seaveyito take testimony.
5H. Edwin Iitchin VS.. Norah Kitchen divorce.
Mcknight, Ferry &c
5lg. Teri. VS.. -; grand larceny; deft. at
large. Bradshaw. pros. atty.
$50. TER. vs.. -, criminal action; Bradshaw, |
pros. atty.
55a. Harris Bros. vs.. o. II. Holcomb at law on
note. Bradshaw Il Jones for plaintiffs.
553 b. F. Moore VS.. ship Austria; DIV Smith,
proctor for libellant, Bradshaw ,S Jones for re-
spondent.
81. S. Ii. Cottle vs.. X. Blown at law for
wages. d. w. Smith for pltf. c. Ii. Hanford for
deft
555. j. Il. WoodIey VS.. Jas. Fallon; D. W.
Smith ptf.
$50. Waltdrs & Fecheimer VS.. j. E. Pugh; at
law on note $500. G. NJ. Ha:ler for pltf.
557. j. E. Fallon VS. Margaret Fallon; diyorcei
d. W Smith for pitt.
55S. j. Carroll bktne. Retriever; in ad-
miralty, seamans wages. d. W. Smith, proctor
for libellant.
559. U. s. vs.. II. Butcher; selling liquor to In-
dians. c. IL. IIanford, asst. atty, On bail, 500.
56l. Teri. vs. E. Gragnie, defacing brand or
mark Bradshaw, pros. atty. On bail.
562- T. Martin VS.. s. Kenny; at law for money
loaned. Bradshaw & Jones for pltf., d. W.Smith
for deft.
553 L. s. vs. E. B. Mallet, master ship Kate
Davenport; violation statutes. e. ii. Hanford,
asst. atty. On bail.
56l. f. G. Liungstrom, ct. al. VS.. ship Kate
Davenport; libel, seaman's wages. ID. w. Smith,
proctor for libcllants
565. L. S. VS.. All Long, Chinaman, snuggring.
C. II. Hanford. asst. pros. atty.
56G. A. Hagensen and f. J. Ljngstrom vs.. E.
b. Malleti libel in personam. d. w. Smith,
proctor for libeants.
J67. n. Galbreath vs.. Waterman & Katz.
Bradshaw & Jones for ptf.; Kuhn It Burke for
defts
56S. Gasches Bros vs.. d. ". c. Dennison; at
law on note ss.aa.4s. Bradshaw & Jones for pltf
so Sarah Goodwin vs, Silas Goodwin; di-
vorce. Kuhn & Burke for ptf., d. W. Smith for
deft.
571. Linnie Chase VS.. y. Chase; divorce.
Binkley Il Taylor for deft.
5I2. Waterman & Katz vs.. PIT. T. Mill Co. and
G. W. Bullene; foreclosure lien. Kuhn & Burke
for pltf.
57S- Waterman & katz vs.. c. Oberg, G. Will
liams and + Robson; at law on note and account
ID. w. Smith for pltf
534. n. j. II. Fortman vs.. j. &. Phinney; at
law on contract. ID. w. Smith for pltf.
so. Teri. vs.. +. Nelson, assault with deadly
weapon. Bradshaw, pros atty.
5l6. Ellen andC. W. Philbrick vs.. :. Lind,
equity foreclosure mortgage, d. W. Smith for
577. Krous & FEEDER vs. J. b. Harker: ut law ON
acct, $40 Kuhn & Burke forpltf.
5ol: L. p. Bailer, appellant, VS.. Commissioners
San Juan Co. Kuhn / Burke for ptf