Morning journal and courier., 1883-03-10

This court camein, yesterday morning 10 at
 o'clock.
 On the motion of John s. Beach, counsel cock & Co.,, of Liverpool, England, vs. Will COX, Gibbs $ Co.,, of Savannah, Georgia, Attorney W. H. Law, counsel for the plaintiff,
 was required to give 8 more detailed account
 of items in his bill of particulars. Suit is
 brought on commission account of cotton purchase in which balance of about $60,- 900 is alleged to be due. The bill of parti- culars filed by MT. Law was regular broker's commission account, but was not understood
 by the court or counsel for the defendants.
 MT. Law asked the court not to make any
 order which would place the time of correct ing the errors in the complaint and answer any more remote than was necessary. 'tThere is,'' said he, "a petition pending on the part
 of Daniel Wilcox's brother to have him ad-
 judged insolvent. The petition is based on three notes representing an indebtedness of
 $75, 1000. We don't wish our claim preju-
 diced by these proceedings, as they might be
 if we were unable to give to the other court
 an inteligible account of our status in this. ''
 Judge Andrews gave the parties thirty days
 in which to amend their papers. The petition of George W. Bradley vs. the
 town of Oxford for a new highway was on
 trial yesterday forenoon. The petitioner al- leges @ new road necessary on account of the ice and water flooding the road in the spring time. The town of Oxford denies that new road is necessary; they file 8 cross-bill, al leging that if necessary it should be con structed by the Ousatonic Water company. Lawyer Terry appeared for Bradley, John w. filling for Oxford and Judge Torrance for
 the Water company, which denies all liabil ity. The hearing was concluded. State Attorney Doolittle appeared before
 the court and made a motion to file 8 new replication in the quo warranto mayoralty contest. Mir. Beach, as attorney for Henry G. Lewis, objected. Judge Andrews said he was inclined to the belief that MT. Doo- little had a right to file 8 new replication, as the court had ruled the previous one insufi- cient.
 The court called for the reading of the present replication. It goes more into de- tail and alleges that at the election in the First ward while 673 votes were cast only 649 were counted; in the Second ward 83s cast and 791 counted; Fourth ward S8O cast $40 counted; Fifth ward 670 cast 65l count. ed; Sixth ward 716 cast, 722 were counted Seventh ward 1,031 cast, 1,1O9 counted Eighth ward 622 cast, 593 counted. Also that seven votes cast for F. s. Andrew were not counted for Frank s. Andrew, whict should have been done. The court asked MT. Beach if he still ob jected to MT. Doolittle's filing the new repli cation. The gentleman asked for time tc cAnAnAuo tAo pdpo1S, WA1cu WaS AccOlu6t ! him.
 Divorces were granted as follows Harriet V. Truesdale, of New Haven, iron Oscar B. Truesdale, of Newtonville, Mass | Cause, adultery. Married February II 1872.
 Ernest Kohlhoff from Bertha Kohlhoff both of New Haven. Cause, adultery, Mar | ried March 4, 1867.
 Emma Daniels from Simon Daniels, botl ! of New Haven; married March 25, 1877 ! cause, intemperance.
 | At the bar meeting in the afternoon thu ! following resolutions were presented ant ] adopted with only one or two dissentin; I votes:
 Resolved, That the Superior court be re 1 quested to appoint committee on grievance l to consist of not less than three members O the New Haven County Bar.
 Resolved, That it be the duty of the com | mlttee to hear and investigate any and al 1 cases wherein any member of this bar i 1 charged with professional misconduct, ant 1 that said committee shall have power to pro l ceed in such hearings in such manner as t l them may seem advisable.
 l The court appointed Simeon B. Baldwin 1 William B. Stoddard and William l.. Bonnet
 as such committee.
 The following assignments were made: | Tuesday, March 13.-Cleaveland vs | Cleaveland, special Holiday vs. Winoheste I ! Railroad Go. vs. New York and Connection l Air Line Railroad Co.,, nisi Isbell vs. same
 nisi; Lee vs. Southbury, Mathewman vs | Reed.
 1 Wednesday, March 14.-Jones vs. Bren
 man, Fagan's appeal, nisi; Smith vs. Smith Kiel vs. Carll, Newton vs. Brown, Ives vs
 Ives, Mcbride vs. Mcbride, Healy vs Nev
 Haven, Amesbury vs. Amesbury, Miller vs 1 New Haven.
 Thursday, March 15.-Hubbell vs. Mich | ols.
 Wednesday, March 21-Smith vs Smith JURY CASES. Tuesday, March 27.-Russen vs. s Moves 1 same vs. Robertson, same vs. Sperry, same
 vs. B. Moves, same vs. Sperry; Curran vs Fay, nisi Lee vs. Southbury; Shipman vs Hill !; Andrews vs Hall; Colonys appeal.
 Court adjourned until next Tuesday morn
 ing, when Judge Beardsley will be on the
 bench.