The National tribune. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1877-1917, 1883-08-16
SEEING IS BELIEVING.
Our Subscribers Opinions of the Waterbury Watch
Read What They Say.

SEEING IS BELIEVING.
Our Subscribers Opinions of the Waterbury Watch.
Read What They Say.
MASON, w. Va, June %, 1888
The Waterbury watch came duly to hand. 1t
comes up to ali nay expectations. II. DANIEL.
ITHACA, N " June %, 1888.
received the watch all right. l started taccord-
ing to instructions, and it has run spendidly ever
since. p. n. MCNAMARA.
CONVICTION, o. June 20, 1888.
received the watch in good order and ana well
pleased with it, Thanks for your berality
BENZ. +. SrEELMAN.
HIcKsv1LLE, O., June, 1888.
" have had a great many time-pieces, but none
HIRAM G. HOFFMAN.
PEABODY, KAN, June IL, 1888.
The Waterbury is at hand, and after good test
can say that it Is as reliable time piece as have
ever carried. WM. II. MEARs.
RocKFoRD, Ill. May 81, 1888.
The watch and chain received. Am well pleased
with the watch 1t has kept good time ever since
received it. IL. G. CoNDE.
TAwAs CRY. Mich, May %. 1883.
Received watch the 2Ist inst. Think it is n good
watch for the money. Respectfully yours,
D. WECKERBY.
WrLLowrowN, KY, May 81, 1888.
The watch you sent me arrived in due time and
Is giving satisfaction. Yours, &c,
GEORGE w. PARRoTT.
PAwSEE City, NEB May IS, 1888.
Ireceived the watch and chain all right and am
well pleased with them. The watch keeps good
time.
HALIFAX, Pa, May IS, 1855.
received the watch and well pleased with
If. Q. ZIMMERMAN.
BRooKLYN, N " June 20, 1888.
received the watch you sent, and it is running
nicely. Many thanks. J.. II. ESSEX.
HELENA NJ T., June Il, 1888.
received the Waterbury watch which you sent
me In good shape; 1t keeps good time, and
would not part with it for twice the price ii cost
me. JAMES Q. REED.
WASHINGTON, KAN, June 6, 1888.
The watch arrived safely. 1t is a reliable time
piece, not varying second from the regulator
here. Am pleased in every way. w. g. OGDEN.
CoFFEYvILLE, KAN. June IA, 1888.
The watch and chain came to hand all right, and
are entirely satisfactory. ID. A. DAVIS.
oLATHE, KAN. june Il, 1888.
The watch received o. x. Il is better titan ex-
pected. Many thanks. c. a. VAEHoRN.
INDEPENDENCE. Mo. June ii, 1888.
Watch received. l think it splendid. Many
thanks. CARRIE o. HARRINGTON.
LooGooTEE ILL., June s. 1883.
The watch came all right. 1t is first-rate and I
can recommend it to all as reliable and accur-
ate time-keeper. JOHN w. MoRRIs.
ANTHONY, KAN, June IS, 1855
have received the Waterbury watch. 1t is
daisy and starts off on its journey with smile on
its face. J. p. HORTON.
ELLIS. KAN. June 9th, 1883
The watch keeps splendid time. 1t is daisy,
and am well pleased with it, ELISHA FINCH.
BIG RAPIDS, MICH, July, 1883
Send ne two more watches for amount inclosed.
HUMBOLDT, Iowa, May %, 1888.
received the watch ali right. Its good timer.
1 am well satisfied. j. LEDGER.
VERPLANK, Y. Y, May IA, 1888
I received the watch and am quite pleased with
II. PATRICK CURTIS.
KEspALLvIILx, IND, May 15 1888
Watch came TO hand safely and well pleased
with IT, think will soon be able to send you
some more orders. Respectfully, s. s. DINGMAN
ST. JOINS, Mich, May u, 1885,
Your elegant watch has been received. think
it Is the cheapest and most reliable time-keeper
should send for THE NATIONAL TRIBUNE and get
the Waterbury," Yours, respectfully.
O. o. WILSON
wIsDsoR, KIN May 81, 1888
Received the watches all right. Have tried the
Waterbury and kept school by it, 1t has given as
much satisfaction as though it cost $50
Yours, respectfully, S. B. THOMPSON.
MERIDEN, CoSN May Of, 1888
have received the watch and chain which you
sent me. am greatly pleased with the watch, for
II exceeds my expectation IN beauty of finish IL is
marvel of neatness in its construction. The chain
Is handsome. Respectfully, yours,
S. j. CAMPBELL,
The one you sent me Is not inferior as an accurate
time-keeper 10 any Waltham have carried.
Should the next prove good. no doubt viii send
large order SOON" ID. A. MOORE
MAcKsBURG, Iowa July I6, 1888
am well pleased with the watch. 1t keeps good
time. and would not part with it, IL is a very
handsome and durable watch, and good enough
for anyone. ALVIN GRIswoLD.
MURpHYsBoRo' ILL, July II, 1883.
received the watch and chain you sent me. Am
greatly pleased with the watch, for it exceeds my
expectation in beauty Of finish. The chain is
handsome one. TEoS MCNEIL.
CULPEPEE, VA, July Is, 1888
The watch is honest and interesting as THE
TRIBUNE, and is handsome and useful article.
ROBERT Y. PATTERSON,
.Supt National Cemetery.
SANTA Rosa, CAL.
/ received the watch and chain, and am ex-
tremely well pleased with it. HENRY ScHENCK.
HYAxSIs MASS, May 81, 1888.
Watch received al right and runs well. Am
much pleased with it. Yours, &c, ID. b. Snow.
swANToN, ONO, June %, 1888.
My pet" the Waterbury watch, was duly re-
ceived, and feel proud OF it. More than pleased
j.. w. NoRTHRUP.
Cross Village, MIcH., June %, 1883.
The watch was received in good order, and it has
e. B. Brown.
CLEAR LAKE, Iowa, June 20, 1888.
To say that am pleased with the watch would
perfect time, and has saved me the price of il in
dinner horns. q. l.. HAMsTREET.
JOPLIN, Mo, July ., 1898.
Received the Waterbury watch. 1t is everything
that il Is represented to be, and am well pleased
with it. LoFTUs TEEFERs.
Fort ScoTT, KAN, July A. 1883.
received my Waterbury watch all right like
1t very much It keeps time spienddy and don't
see how the watch can be made for the money.
i. l.. BoURQUIN,
NEW HARTFORD Iowa, July 7, 1888.
The Waterbury watch that / got about ten
months ago Is n number one time-keeper, lwould
not take so for it if / could not get another.
THos. HoUCK.
SILVER LAKE, KAN, July T. 1888
i received the watch all right and am well
pleased with IT, 1t keeps good time as the rail-
road ciiroHo2leter here. J. AsHRoLE.
EXETER, NEB.. July IS, 1888.
] like the watch very much, and think il well
worth the money, Would recommend it TO all
wh6waut cheap watch and that will keep
good time. A. LEFFLER.
CLINTON, Iowa, June o. 1888
have now had the Waterbury watch some time
anl we'll pleased with it. and it is more than ex-