National Republican., 1883-01-10
law ANn .II,s,rGrE.
W''ot Was Done in thc United States su-
prCmc Court rDd I'm t.ic Local Courts.


THE SUPREME COURT.
The following business Vas transacted in
the supreme court of the United States ycstcr-
day:
On motion of Wager Swayne, Lc Grand
Young, of Salt Lake City, was admitted to
practice.
No. 9,G. II. A. Goodrich, assignee, &C., ap-
pcilunt VS.. Andrew Richmond, assignee &c.
Appeal from the circuit court of the United
states for the northern district Of Illinois.
Dismissed with costs.
No. 9l2. james c. Hasclton, plaintiff in
error, vs.. Thomas O'COnnor. In error to the
circuit court of the Uiiiod States for the
middle district OF Tennessee. Dismissed,
each party to pay lis own costs.
No. si5. Andrew Antoni, plaintiff in error,
VS. Samuel &. GtccnhOw. treasurer &C. Ar
pmcut concluded by William J.. Royal for
plaintiff in error and +. $. Blair for defendant
in error b.,
No. 1i5. James w. Lowell ct al, appellants,
vs. The St. Louis Mutual life insurance com
pany ct al. Passed.
No 1iG. Tho inhabitants of the township
OF st. Clair N. ,J2. plaintiffs in error, VS..
Charles Dana and No. 1iT The same plain-
tiiis in error, VS.. Thomas Ramsdcll. Argu-
mont commenccdby T. n. McCartyr for plain
tt!S in error and continued by John +. Dillon
for defendant in error in No. liz
SUIT AGAINST DoNDsMEN.
Suit was yesterday entered by the United
States for the use of Charles Edward Tanning
against Henry A. Jones and William Adams
TO recover the sum OF $500. The defendants
were bondsmcn of Richard H. Marsh. guar
dian Of Tanning and it is claimed hc did not
faithfully perform his trusts.
DAMAGES RECOVERED FROM THE DISTRICT
In the circuit court yesterday Frank S.
Eaton recovered $3.50 from the district for
damages received while driving along K
street, near Thirteenth northwest, on the
night of Dec. 2i, 1881. A dead horse
Cncumbcred the roadway, and the plaintiff
run on il, damaging his buggy and sustaining
severe bodily injuries.
VERDICT FOR THE DEFENDANT.
In the circuit court yesterday the case of
Amcdcc NGlmont against Bcnedcta Constan-
time for 5000 damages, for slundcr, was tried
and resulted in II verdict for the defendant.
CASE or THE MONTE MEN.
The appeal case of Murphy and the other
thrcc-Card monte men was submitted in the
court in banG yesterday aud decision re-
served. The decision is expected next Mon
day.
WANTS TO BE FREED FROM HER HUSBAND
A suit for divorce has been filed by Fannie
4. 5. Ware against Charles II. Ware. They
were married here March 20, 1876, aud have
three children. The plaintiff charges her
husband with desertion and non-support
lie is employed in the house of representa-
tiyCs restaurant.
THE RECORD
Equitu Curt Justice HaOnsr.-Flcetwood VS.
lawksworh; appearance orubsent defendant or
deIed, Ramsey vs.. LCib; snig ratified nisi Leddy
vs. Leddy testimony before John y. Clarke or
dcrel tUkCn Hess VS.. Sullivan; testimony or
dercd taken in iufty-iiyG days. Little vs.. Paiue ;
sales to Alvin n, Lancaster ratified finally. Bar.
/ nett W, National Bunk Of the Republic; argued
ana submitted. frederick VS.. ChrisJiNn; te,ti.
mony ordered taken in thirty.ivc days. Morrow
VS. DANES; hearing commenced. Assignment for
to-day, Nos. s, o. r. H. II. 10. lG H. Is, aud 10.
Circuit COtvt-JuyhCe MGcATdiuT.-JuCkspn ~ Co.
VS. Srhul2c; verdict for defendant. Nulmout VS.
Constantine; verdict for defendant. Eaton vs.
District of Columbia; verdict for plninlir for $3.50
Assignment inr tO.dny--NOs. 9il, 2ji to 2j7, 2J0
2j2 2G3, 2GG to 2Tl inclusive.
Court ., BdRc-7nc ChiCf J,sticc, Justices Coz and
JdmGs.-Unted sttes VS.. Murphy ct al.; argued
/ and submitted, Adjourned I'LL to-day.