Daily Los Angeles herald., 1883-10-13
SUPREME COURT.
DEPARTMENT ONE.

FRIDAY, Oct. ~, 1853
Court met pursuant to adjournment.
Present Mckinstry, j., presiding; Me-
Kee, j.; Ross, j.; Mccarthy, Clerk;
Finkler, Bailiil.
Stoddard vs.. Williams of
Godfrey to place cause on calendar pur.
suant TO stipulation denied.
The CouRT.
0lg5. Anderson Va. Hancock Argued
by Quint aud Satterwhite for appellant
and Rowell for respondent aud submit
ted.
S9l6. Weir VS.. Nail-Argaed by
Smith for appellant and Godfrey for re-
spondent, and appellant allowed 10 days
to file brief, respondent 10 days to re.
ply, cause to be thereon submitted.
On motion of Smith for appellant, and
attorney for respondent consenting, APP
pellant allowed TO file exhibits 10 and 90
g2ll. Livermore VS.. Brundage-On
motion of Brunsou, ordered placed at
foot of calendar for this day. Cause
argued by Bruuson for respondent and
Stetson for petitioner. On motion of
Stetson petitioner allowed to file oerti-
fed copy of minutes of Superior Court.
9l97. Argued by Smith for appellant
and Bicknell for respondent and sub
mitted.
Adjourned to tomorrow at 10 A. NJ.
FRIDAY, OCT. l2-pEPARTMENT ..
Court met pursuant to adjournment.
Present, Thornton, j. presiding; N.Y.
rick, D., Sharpstein, Williams, Dep
uty Clerk; Kewen, Bailifi,
9l49. Jones VS.. Snow ct al.--On mo.
ton OF Gardiner and suggestion of dim
mutton of record, it is ordered that ap-
pellants be allowed to file certified copy
of affidavit and notice of appeal. Cause
argued by Gardiner for appellant and
Scott for respondent and submitted.
9l62, Childs VS.. Mott-Argued by
Dooner for appellant and Smith for re.
spondent.
Walter Drew--On motion Of IL. X. 5.
O'Melveny aud presentation of license
from the Supreme Court of the State OF
Illinois, and evidence of good moral
character, it is ordered that Walter
Drew be and is hereby admitted 10 prac-
tice as mn attorney and counsellor in all
the Courts of this State.
glS9 Urton VS., Wilson-0n motion
of Stetson for appellant. respondent
herein consenting, it is ordered that re.
spondent have twenty days to file brief,
appellant twenty days to reply, cause to
be thereon submitted.
City of Los Angeles VS.. Waldron ct
al-On motion of Stephenson for peti.
toner, respondent herein eonsenting, it
= apa1 fl.aA ,,aNitinpas. l,a,ra
to file brief, respondent ten days to re.
ply, cause to be thereon submitted.
9l4S. GARNER VS.. Grimaud-Order
affirmed. The COURT.
$500 Hutchings, administrator, vs.,
Clark judgment and order affirmed.
THE Court.
~ BANo.-ocT. 10th, 1883.
l0S47. People VS.. Young Judgment
and order affirmed. MVRIeK, J.
We concur;
MCkINSTRY, j.,
THORNTON, j.,
Ross, j.,
SHARPSTEIN, j.,
X MCKEE, j.
7695. Hubert VS.. Mendheim-The
iudment of the Superior Court is re.
vorsed: the cause is remanded with di-
rections to the court below to set aside
the order sustaining the defendants
demuuers, and to enter an order, or
orders, overrnling defendants demevrer
to the complaint as a whole and
overruling the demurrer to the third
count of the complaint and sustaining
the demurrer to the first and second
counts thereof. MckINsTRY, J.
We concur,
SHARPSTEfN, Jo
MYRICK, j.,
THORNTON, j.,
Ross, D.,
MCKEE, j.
S5sS. Lux ct al. VS.. Haggin, ct al,
October II, 1882
S5S7. Lux ct al VS.. Haggin ct al
Pursuant to stipulation filed, it is order
ed that the Kern River Land and Canal
Company, the respondents herein, have
up to and including the 23d day of 0c-
tober, 1883, within which to serve and
file its briefs therein.
MORRISON, c. j.,
THORNTON, j.,
SHARPsTErN, j..
MCKEE, j.
Ordered that in the preparation OF the
Sacramento calendar the Clerk place
thereon all cases appealed from the
county of Solano. THE COURT.
l0.S2l. People VS.. Wheeler. Ordered
that cause stand submitted. Judgment
aud orders appealed from are affirmed,
and tile cause is remanded for further
proceedings according to law.
The COURT.