The Austin weekly statesman. (Austin, Tex.) 1883-1898, 1883-05-03
THE COURTS.
Supreme Court,

oCdyIon y. D. west, associates; 4. >. Morse.
clerk.
Thompson ct al VS.. Comstock ct al;
from Wise county. Reversed and re-
manded.
l. & G. n. Ry. VS.. Graves; from
BeXar county. Same order as above.
l. q G. n. Ry. VS.. Benitos: from
BeXar county.
Franco-TeXan land company VS..
Laigle; from Parker country. AT
| tirmed.
Perez VS.. Perez; from Bexar coun-
ty. Reversed and remanded.
Muse VS.. the state; from Travis
county. Affirmed.
Butler VS.. the state; from Travis
county. Affirmed.
Fort ct al VS.. Powell; from Ellis
county. Affirmed.
II. & T. G. Ry. VS.. Narcotics; from
Grayson county. Affirmed.
Randle VS.. Smith; from Dallas
county. Reversed and remanded.
Mcconnell ct al VS.. Sawyne; from
Parker county. Affirmed on certif-
cate.
Parker county VS.. .Couts & Co.;
from Parker county. Reversed and
remanded.
Little VS.. Overton ct al; from Dal-
las county. Refused to affirm on GER
tificate.
Carter ct al VS.. Conner; from Travis
county. Submitted on briefs and oral
argument for both parties.
Bates VS.. Thompson; from Travis
county. Same order as above.
This court consumed the day in
hearing the evidence in the case of the
state of Texas VS.. Brown and Pierce,
reported yesterday as charged with
theft from Mrs. Daisy Greedy and
Miss White. Hon. E, Taylor Moore
appeared for the state and Mr.. C. r.
Johns for the defendant. Case con-
tinued to-day.
Emma Davis and Peggie Hill, as
sault; S. and costs.
VIM. G. Brown, for fighting; So and
costs.
Geo. Book, Hugh Anderson and
Bill Hankle, for drunkenness; So and
costs.
Cases decided and reported to SUI
preme court yesterday:
Norton ct al VS.. Cantagral; from
Dallas county. Reversed.
Moore & Paitan vs.. Wagner; from
Guadalupe. Affirmed.
Swope VS.. Stunberger; from Guada-
lupe. Affirmed.
Galveston, Houston a. San Antonio
railroad; from Guadalupe. Affirmed.
A. j. Fry VS.. Baker ct al; from Qua
dalupe. Affirmed.
Anderson VS.. Sutherland, admins
TRAITOR; from Wilson. Reversed.
Carlisle VS.. Coffee Il Prise; from
Williamson. Reversed.
Henderson VS.. Jones; from Tarrant;
in preference. Reversed, and prior
order set aside.
Amelie VS.. Leeper ct al; from Collin.
Reversed.
Huff VS.. Clark; from Wilson. Re
versed.
Harris VS.. Musgrove; from Atlas
cosa. Reversed.
Graves VS.. Hickman; from Bexar.
Reversed.
The district court of Travis county
convenes Monday, May Z, 1883.
The following is the order of the
docket, to-wit:
1. The non-jury civil docket will be
taken up Tuesday, May 8, and con-
tinue two weeks.
2. The jury civil docket will be
O1hCh uP NAOAusiy, NudN Il, duu COu-
tinue two weeks.
3. The criminal docket will be taken
up Monday, June 4, and continue I'M
til disposed of.
4. After the criminal docket the
civil docket will be disposed of. A
second call of the docket will be made.
5. Motions heard on Saturdays.
To-day Tuesday is the last day of
10 hInry
Frank Peter, fast driving; So and
costs.
Frank Williams, sleeping in pub
lie place; S. and costs.
Sam Vance, disturbing the peace;
So and costs.
Minnie Curley, disturbing the
peace; dismissed.
r. H. Brumby VS.. S. Bailetti; suit
for an account of $25. Verdict for
plaintiff.
Fifteen Judgments were taken by
default in this court yesterday.
j. T. Wuck VS.. Austin and North
we tern railway; suit for 5000 for al
legged injuries received in run off
near Leander on the Goth of March,
1888. Citations issued and case set
for last Monday in May.
In the case of the state VS.. F. NJ.
Brown ard j. L. Pierce, charged with
theft of pictures from Mrs. Edna
White, Brown and Pierce were bound
over to the district court in the sum of
$500 each, in default of which they
were sent to iail