Morning journal and courier., 1883-05-12
guuruxI anA GGurisr.
Saturday. May 12, 1883.
The Court Record.
Superior Court - Civil Side = Judge
 

Superior Court - Civil Side Judge
 BeardsIey.
 This court came in yesterday at 10 o'clock.
 It was divorce day and the business was unusually lively in this particular branch of court business.
 In the divorce suit of Minnie s. Peck vs. Waiter Peck, Clerk Ingersoll, who heard the ing of 8 decree to Mrs. Peck MT. Doolttle {, counsel for the defendant, gave notice that he should probably file remonstrance.
 Attorney Fairchild, of New York city, made motion for an extension of time in which policy holders of the defunct National Life and Trust company might file their claims MT. Fairchild based his motion on the ground that many of the policy holders had not received proper mo- tice of the progress of affairs; others neg lected to present their claims because they supposed until recently that there was no prospect of a dividend being declared. Judge
 Beardsley ordered that the time for submit
 ting the claims be extended to ono week from yesterday. In the course of the arguments on the motion, Receiver Russell stated that he should be prepared to wind up the affairs of the company early in tho fall. He said nothing, however, about the amount of the
 prospective dividend to the policy holders. In the afternoon the counsel in the suits l brought by E. Malley & Go. against about l thirty insurance companies who held risks on the burned store of the firm were engaged in preparing to submit tc ! to the Supreme Court of Errors. It waE l pleaded by the insurance companies tha | they were not legally bound by the policies ! for the reason that after the policies were
 executed a change was made in the member \ ship of the firm of which they were not not1 | fled. Beach, Blydenburgh and Bronson rep resent the plaintiffs and filling and Cham berlain the defendants.
 Judgment for the defendant was given ID the case of James P. Hart against Samue | Jackson. The suit was brought to compel ! the reconyeyal to the plaintiff of real estate ' in Orange street worth about $12, 900, whicE | he transferred to the defendant while the lat | ter was administrator of his fathers estate In the case of John B. Hubbard vs. Ed | ward Griswold, which is an action of assump sit, Judge Beardsley's decision was for the plaintiff to recover $2, S26.24. The interest ed parties belong in Guilford and are con l nected with tho Guilford Canning company The following divorces were granted dur ing the day:
 Julia 0. Saekett from Howard A. Sackett both of New Haven; cause, desertion. Mar ried June 3O 1874 The care of two minor
 children was given to the plaintiff. Dennis M. Lucey, of New Haven, from Elizabeth Lucey, of parts unknown; cause assertion. Married February 19, 1860.
 Henrietta Cronin from Michael Cronin
 both of New Haven; cause, habitual intem
 perance. Married May l, 1864.
 Mary A. Grant, of New Haven, from Johr
 F. Grant, of parts unknown; cause desertion
 Married October 30, 1872.
 Augusta Duester, of Seymour, from Henry Duester, of Seymour; cause, adultery. Mar ried November g, 1866.
 Jennie E. Hoadley from Hervey s. Hoad- ley, both of New Haven Cause, habitual intemperance. Married October 6, 1879. Belle G. Hart, of Milford, from William A. Hart, of Milford Cause, habitual intem perance. Married October 30, 1870. Lucy E. DoudlaW from Frederick Doud-
 law, both of Meriden. Cause, habitual in temperance Married June ?, 1875. AIonzo L. Scripture, of Bridgeport, from
 Ellen J. Scripture, of Orange. Cause, de
 sertion. Married September 22, 1866. John Wingood, of Guilford, from Phoebe Wingood, of Wallingford Cause, corporeal imbecility. Married January 8, 1878. Tina Cowell, of Derby, from Edward J. Cowell, of Pittsfeld, Mass. Cause, deser. ton. Married October 3, 1877. Theresa Beck from Paul Beck both oi New Haven. Cause intolerable cruelty Married July 31, 1871.
 Court adjourned until Monday afternoon at 2 o'clock.