The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1883-12-13
DISTRICT COURT - ASSIGNMENT OF
CASES,


DISTRICT COURT - ASSIGNMENT OF
CASES.
In the case of the state VS.. Bell Euoank,
colored cypriau, charged with being an
accompice of William Rose, who was given
nine years Thursday, on the charge Of rob
bling w. II. Hewling, United States sol.
der of. 5000, the jury hung. She has fig,
nred quite extensively Ill the courts OF
justice.
In The care of the state VS.. ]. W. Truck,
charged with emhezzing, on The 29th OF
March, 1888, while acting 'as messenger
tor the Pocifc express company
$500, the personal property OF one
6. p, Curtis, the dciandant gave bond
ia the sum OF 5000, with M. l.. Crawford
and Il. e Thompson as bondsmen.
To-day will close the October term OF this
court, which has during the time 1t has
been sitting, disposed of q large amount OF
business. Monday the December term be-
gins, and there is enough unfinished busl-
ness to engage the court for some
time. A new grand Jury. VIII meet
on Monday. The following is the
" ASSIGNMENT
of new jury cases in the district court
the first week Of the Decent bar term, co
mencing Monday, December 10, 1858:
100 ]. NJ Brown VS., Thos, Flynn,
900 FIR pcis A Lacey vs., Daniel Daley.
gi75 State OF Texas VS., Southwestern Life In9.
1907 f. 3. Moore ct nj. VS., Robert Hart ct al,
$3.50 J. NJ. Chapman VS.. ]. B. Loughery.
1854 Il L. Bargalis vs. Ethan Crunch ct al.
1888 S.a,s of Texas VS., B, F Neil tai;
1884 state of Texas VS.. J. W. stone er al
1885, State OF Texas vs.. II. A. McWhorter ct al.
$3.50 State of Texas vs.. r, A, New lorter ct al.
1898 Mary A. West VS.. " H. Freeman ct al
1864 L. sic ]. Smith VS.. Anthony BOYD e. al
s T1,-r NJ I.
1919 q. L. Keene VS.. W. N. Edrsrds5et al
s026 Lizzie Handey VS. L. B Thompson ct al.
1850 AIsms & Leonard vs. Mills Viluy
l034 state Of Texas w. Nancy T pGlIey ct
1862 D. G. Lindsey ct al. vs. P. S. BrowEE, OK
ecutOr, ct 81.
1917 Thos. Wells vs. Elizabeth Wslls,
4OS9 VIM. f. Merritt VS.. A, G Burlle.
dI9S Adams & l. onard VS., W. X. Cornish.
4i7g-J, A. Smith ct al. ve W. X. Cornish.
4igO-A6ram Carver VS., seyene lodge A. f, and
42al-Adams and Leonard VS. u. Stewart.
425O-St4te of Texas VS.. E. II. Rains ct al.
426l maggie Smith vs.. maxwell Smith.
l2S6- bran Burl VS.. Amin Il Brick
43lS-ThUmas Carroll ct a.; Ys. WIZ eI a."
i3i2-Texas & Pacific Railway company VS.
Dallas & Wichita Railway company.
435S-Santure VS.. Texas & Pacific Railway COM
4aO2-Nsncyv Rider ys. Anderson Rider.
liO3 ROBOT Newcomb VS.. Betty NeTcomo'
4ii2 William CaIuth VS.. Amos McComma5 81
al.
i4oi-Wash VIM vs. Austin Hook ct al.
4l55-state Of Texas VS. James yrton ct al
4i57 n L, Marsalis vs.. Joseph Mercer,
li65-sallie Slaughter VS. Fed Slaughter.
II6S-Rueben Deau VS.. Nathan Tiplett.
4iS2-J NJ Clle ct al vs. John NJ, Cole.
IlSg -Nariah Caster VS.. George Faluier ct a.
ii96--Chana Williams VS.. Ellen Wiliamg.
4jO6-Pdul Henry ct al. VS.. Haea Mess d Co., e
a.
l592-Ma'lnda Porter VS.. Rraze Porter,
459;-Isnac Leonard VS. MOllie Leonard.
1861 Wesley Brandenburg VS.. f. T. Meyer eta !
| l5G3-Narv p. Fortsen ct al vs.. George +. Al
ford ct al
| 45sO-C lroline Head vs. Thomas Head.
4-g5-R NJ PAGE VS. r. II. Tooley
| 47lg-Mrs. f. Monroe w. George Monroe
wednesday,