Arizona weekly citizen., 1883-06-09
DISTRICT COURT.
Judge A. W. sheldon. Associate Justice
 Enrn.,- I.,r..a 1aA


 FRIDAY, June 1st Territory of Arizona vs. John Drum mond, assault with intent to commit murder. The jury being unable to agree, they were discharged from further consideration of the case.
 Territory of Arizona vs. James Carroll and B. de Germo. grand larceny; s de Germo tried alone on indictment No. A 54: jury find a verdict of not guilty against defendant
 SATURDAY. June 2d. David Duuham vs. Marcus Katz; motion to quash execution denied.
 E. O'Counor vs. J. W. Gardner; de- nurrer sustained, ten days to give answer.
 Wm. Niles, an indigent witness in the case 0f John Drummond, allowed Sl3.50 for expenses.
 Ruff vs. Morgan; ten days given to ile an amended answer.
 City of Tucson vs. Ye Chil; continued till next Saturday.
 City of Tucson vs. Bill ct al; continued till next Saturday by agreement
 Territory of Arlzona vs. John Drum mOnd continued for the term.
 CarrillO ys. Merchant; stipulation filed dismiSsing the case.
 Browder vs, Wilkins; continued till next Saturday by consent.
 Conway vs. Campbell; same order k. Perrine vs. J. W. Luttrel ct al; demurrer withdrawn and twenty days given to answer.
 Gervais vs. McDanlels; continued un- til LeXt Monday.
 United States vs. Levi Ruggles; de- murrer argued and taken under advise ment; five days to file briefs.
 Wakefield ct al vs. ". R. Ingram; counsel for respondent objects to the hearing of this cause, ss this court did not have jurisdiction in the case; coun- sel for appellant objects t. any argument on the question, Rs no motion had been filed or served; objection Overruled; ex- ception taken; argued and taken under advisement and allowed 10 file brief.
 Marcus Katz vs. California Powder Works; on trial.
 MONDAY, June 1. Court met at 10 a. m. Minutes of June a read and approved
 NJ. KatZ vs. L. Zecke1dorf; on mo- tion of c. C. Stephens, Esq, 1t is or tered that this case be tried before 0 Jury.
 Geryais vs. Eli McDaniels; on motion of James 4. Zibristie, attorney for plaintiff, 1t is ordered that this case be continued until Wednesday, June 9th. Hiram ,. Stevens vs. NJ. BorqueZ and SIreta BOrquez; on motion Uf W. J. O. born, counsel for plaintiff, and upon no ice 10 the Colrt that default had been iuly entered, IL IS ordered that the case )e placed on the trial calendar and re erred to the Court Commissioner to take testimony and report to this Court. L. Rnggio vs. Oriple Gold and Silver Mining Company; The motion of Hu-b Farley, on behalf of the bondsmen oi .ppellant for a stay Of execution for five lays Is denied.
 George T. Wooliolk vs. F. H. Paul, Sheriff; on mOhOn Of T. L. Stiles, case set for trial June 18th.
 Territory vs. B. DeGarmO and Carroll On motion of Joseph c. Perry, Esq II l. ordered that an attachment issue tor W Il. Beck.
 The yenIre heretofore issled for B persons to serve as a United State Grand Jury having been duly returned tue following persons answered to rhel names, to-wit: u. B. Cullum, II. BruuS !. G. Goodman, G. A. Cum, Wm. II Burke, W. $. Edwards, F. K. Yelling -on, Charles Kresham, II. F. Bennett leop0llO Carrill', [. Johnson, Ii. < 'aples, NJ. Mahoney, Philip Schr-lbeF Ionn E Magee, Abe Marx, W. J. White Richard Starr, J. Fl. c. Waltermath, E Lloyd, A. Scott, $. c. Lewis, J. W Davis. The panel being complete, the jury were sworn on voir dire. Fl. 5 Jullum was appointed foreman by the court. Tue statutory oath was admin istered, and the jury retired for the coz alteration of the dutles. Horace Appe! vas appointed baliff ID charge of tue iury.
 Territory vs. Geo. Cooler: mlsdemean- or; Alex. Campbell. esq, appointei as District Attorney especially to prose cutt this case. The defendant, represented by .. c. Stephens, esq, asked permission tO withdraw hls former plea of moi guilty. and enter a plea of guilty, which was allowed, and the defendant ID per son plead ,d that he was guilty of the Jff-nse charged in the indictment. rhe lime for passing sentence being waived ly defendant, the Court being fully ad- 5isei m the premises, rendered its judg- neat as follows. to wit: That the defend mt pay a fine of $500.
 Territory vs. IhOs. E. Lisle; grand larceny; District Attorney r. NJ. Smith for prosecution; Hereford. Hoover & Lowell for defendant. Jury trial--ou -riai