Daily Los Angeles herald., 1883-10-06
MONDAY, OCTOBER Srn.

I0A. N.
MONDAY, OCTOBER 8TH.
Motiens--Examination Of applicants
for admission TO practice.
IN BANG.
Southern Pacific Railroad Company,
appellant, VS.. Garcia, respondent, Los
Angeles.
Southern Pacific Railroad Company,
appellant, VS.. Bennett. respondent. Los
Angeles.
Burt & Brother, respondents, VS.. Col
lins ct al, appellants, Los Angeles.
Mound City Land and Water Com
dany, etc., respondents, VS.. Phillips,
ETC., appellants, Los Angeles.
White ct al, appellants, vs. Water
man ct al, respondents, San Bernardino
Taylor ct al, appellants, VS.. McLain,
ct. al, respondents, Los Angeles.
Swift ct al, respondents, VS.. Shep-
ard, appellant, Santa Barbara.
People, respondent, VS.. Davis appel
llnt, San Bernardino.
People. respondent, vs.. Mcdonald, ap-
pellant, San Bernardino.
People, respondent, va. Biggins, ap-
pellant. Fresno.
People, respondent, vs.. Smith appel
liant, Yoio.
People, respondent. vs.. Richards, ap-
pelant, Placer
People. appellant, vs.. Fahey. respon-
dent, Merced.
People, respondent, vs.. Riley, appel
liant, San Francisco.
People, respondent, vs.. All Lem, ap-
pellant, Sacramento.
TUESDAY, ocf. 9-DEPARTMRNT |.
Burton, appellant, vs. Nichols, re-
spondent, Santa Barbara.
Becker, respondent, vs.. Ferrier ct al,
appellants, Santa Barbara.
Harris, appellant, vs.. Careaga. respon-
dent, Santa Barbara.
DEPARTMENT 2.
Savings and Loan Society, appellant,
| VS.. Gerichten, respondent, San Diego.
Estate of Burton, Mcdonald, admins
traitor, appellant, San Diego.
Howard, respondent, vs.. Stratton, ap-
pellant, San Diego.
Howard ct al, respondents, VS.. STRAIT
ton, appellant, San Diego.
WEDNESDAY, OCT. l0-DEPARTNEST !.
Boorman ct al, respondents, VS.. City
Of Santa Barbara, appellant, Santa Bar
bara.
Bailey, respondent, vs.. Sloan, appel
lant,f Kern.
Critics. respondent, vs.. Wilkinson ct
al, appellants, Kern.
DEPARTMENT 2.
DAILY, appellant, vs.. All Coon ct al,
respondents, San Diego.
Estate of McKinnon, deceased, San
Diego.
County of San Diego, appellant, VS..
California Southern X. r. Co, respon-
dent, San Diego.
Estate of Burton. deceased. San
Diego.
rnGRsDAy, OCT ll-pEPARrMENr l..
California Southern Railroad Com
pany, respondent. VS.. Southern Pacific
Railroad Company, appellant, San Ber-
nardino.
California Southern Railroad Com
pany, respondent, We. Western Develop
ment Company, appellant, San Bernar-
dino.
California Southern Railroad Com
pany, respondent, VS.. Southern Pacific
Railroad Company, appellant, San Ber-
lnardino.
Hart, respondent, vs. Tibbitts ct al. /,
appellant, San Bernardino.
DEPARTMENT ..
| De Cells ct al, appellants, vs.. Porter
ct al, respondents, Los Angeles.
| We'll, respondent, vs. Baldwin ct al,
appellants, Los Angeles.
| Hutchings, administrator, respondent,
VS.. Clark, appellant, Los Angeles.
Hyde, estate of, Los Angeles.
FRIDAY, OCTOBER l2-pEPARrMENT l..
| California Southern Railroad Com
pany, respondent, VS.. Cotton Land and
Water Company, appellant, San Ber-
nardino.
Anderson, respondent, vs.. Hancock,
appellant, San Bernardino.
| Weir, appellant, VS.. Vail, respondent,
Los Angeles.
DEPARTMENT ..
| Plummer, appellant, VS.. Brown, re-
Ispondent, Los Angeles.
GARNER, respondent, VS.. Grimaud ct
al, appellant, Los Angeles.
Jones, respondent, VS.. Snow ct al,
appellants, Los Angeles.
SATURDAY, OCT. l3-pEpARTMENT l..
Gilmore, respondent, VS.. American
Central Insurance Company, of st. Louis,
appellant, Los Angeles.
Taylor ct al, respondent, VS.. McLain,
appellant, Los Angeles.
Jones ct al, respondents, VS.. Myer,
appellant, Los Angeles.
DEPARTMENT ..
Childs, respondent vs.. Mott, admin
istrator, appellant, Los Angeles
San Jacinto Tin Company, respondent,
Tvs. Baker ct AL, appellants, Los Angeles.
| Urton, appellant, VS.. Wilson ct al,
respondents, Los Angeles.
II you want pure liquors and wines 90