The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1883-01-27
SECOND ENGAGEMENT
ID 1nE AN1AooNIs1lc FORCES.
N. I.ttrrsllsltl.s ArnJ cl.sr-' G"'r'I'' and
b. asIst,EIs aS,ts,nt GIiHI AT'Hp'rlrI
Adtlstsst, but after Hard PS1EAt
Battle IL AvIia RspuI,sd.

The Prohlbitory amendment agiln came
up for consideration In the House Of Dele
Eltes yesterday forenoon, and larger crowd
was 10 attendance, both In the galleries and
lobby, than even on the day before, the audi
suce In the latter part Of the hall being largely
composed OF ladies, minister and prominent
citizens Of the city aud State. Among them
were Hon. W. L. Wilson, CongreSsmAn'elect
from the Second district, DR.. W. j. Bland,
Superintendent OF the State Hospital for The
Insane at Weston, eI.stAte Senator MeGregor,
p. W. Morris, E.q., editor Of The Richie
GaIstis Mr.. Dave b. Johnson, Chairman Of
the State Prohibition Committee, J. W. 81
Clair, Esq., Of Charleston, credited with be
inT The leader Of The AntI.ProhIbitlou lobby,
Rev. George Z, Hlte and several other Of the
city minirIsrs, though not rs many rs on the
previous day. At the afternoon session, the
Senate having adjourned, large numbsr Of
members Of that body were also on the floor
OF the House.
The resolution came ~ the special order
al II A. ", on Its third reading, the pending
question being shall the resolution be
lgreed to-"
A sfRATEGIC MOVEMENT.
Mr.. Gilkeson said that on the previous day
he had prepared u substitute for the measure
under consideration, which he had desired
to offer In good faith. lie bad been fore
stalled by tie demand for the previous ques-
ton. He asked that the Opportunity be
extended for him TO submit the substitute,
and for this purpose moved that the vote BY
which the resolution was ordered 10 Its third
reading be reeonsiderd.
In speaking upon this motion, Mr.. Arm
strong took occNion to refer 10 4 remark In
an editorial In yesterdays Rtg!isT, that the
course OF those who favored submitting the
amendment 10 vote OF the people OF the
State, and yet opposed Mr. Halls local option
amendment, suggested ''denagoguefy and
hypocrisy He said he was not here TO act
In accordance with the views Of any news
paper belonging To any party, but TO carry
out his own conscientious ideas Of bis duty.
He denounced the RsgiIlsr with emphasis, cay.
ipg that one more such Democratic paper
would make West Virginia Republican
State.
ADvERrIBIN0 JoHssoS's FIREMAN.
Nj. Psnnybacker responded to these re-
marks, making some pretty severe remarks
Of u semi.peTsonAl character concerning Mr..
Armstrong. He sent TO the Clerks desk and
had read an extract from the last lSSue OF the
Parkeaburg Freeman, the Prohibition organ,
In which was the paragraph:
1.-THE friends Of temperance, In their honest
homes throughout the State, little dream
OF the desperate and dsSracstul means used
10 defeat the prayers Of all the good people
OF the State. A Zee OF 81 900 from the liquor
men, TO prominent lawyer from a distant
part VI the State, 10 LOBBY agalnSt the prayers
| nf his own people and against the homes Of
bis oEn eIentsItns " low y y y uohet
10 this he aaaIesseu hlIlselI IN cuAtac Yer
~ s toan, ~ .0,T",I Sban; = Sonht. m lie
ArmstronGs remaiE soout . GouoIe q aue
nsys. " ,.'na.,.a 1, ,rnUiI Vii ~ ns,ts
pau 49,. tn1 pannLiJssr S,Sto ~ ws.t W.
NY 'uANe -''P"o
s'II' ,J,o rol, said n ,,,i, ware irua be All
,c SI Ssso how soan ths marty died. i'll be
nv Sa,o - III. SwsrdT.It w9pIJ Vim II la
|, ~ Sjijsj nd bnried 1 ihnnsaT feat dsen.
~ ~ soorar ,bs hsItor oT Isn,,Is IN tbat
a aMi. tHe '0'Ns' '''' 's'N''
e"eeH -yv ,.,,or,-rpu ,a,Ix
rue 800, .., +.
Judge Holt also Isi1neq W y S' ~ 1ltI y,
the Regt;ttr eai1otinl .na. non. y; 4. =, Salawei'
bad weakened IA ~ supp3Lt " Ins alnJ ',u.i
men', anu ueGiaeu 'nas ~ s"s pte'toIIS s uay,
before tne eul11 q uTsu iLV ~ u Az. Uee ~
written, ule Io'Io"ins uHpA''H was give" "
the editor' -. ,o,
PAHEERsppEO, January %.
D1re d. J0hRs0H, Whfsifng'
Deny all statements that ! have changed
views Right ana Party pohCy oena I,s,! sg "
mission o. ue Athenutne s1.., a" "eA'"'y i"'
1t as penuing' no" anu away c
ohAkLE' l. oALnNELL
The motion TO reconsider prevailed. aud
| aHa.al IInORa kill Nh IHS n
substitute, vheTeup0n, on motion OF DR.
Simonton, 70 recess was taken TIL half past
two,
sEEIEs OF sEIRMtSHEs.
Unon re.aSsemblinR in the afternoon, DR..
slEpnton rsIsed lie point OF order that a Bill
conid moi be substituted for q Joint resolu.
s sion ,.SIcS noInt hs sustained In some re-
m.rt NJ ybacker Opposed Ii, As did
siSo A. GIlkpson, M. Armstrong sustained
tb The point and il was finally ruled by The
Chair that It vas well taEsn. =. ....,.,,,
the ,esointion and substitute 10 the Judiciary
commI,iee. This motion was opposed With
much warmth by Mr.. David Powell, aud also
by Judge Brown. DR.. simonton again rose
10 A poIut OF order, that the bill not being
before the Hotise. could not be referred, a
nosSiInn which was seconded by Messns, Holt
md rmstronr. and finally sustained by the
chsIr On the motion 10 commit the resolu.
lion Mr. Ruhl demanded the ayes aud noes,
hnt Inc melton was withdrawn.
..,,,,,,,,r,, ,r,,,ru N ~ NOR ppourRrr.
bAohIh4i'O" "t,'S% " - . '' '','.'.,
Judge Brown, who hss acted eons cons
mixed a. such, moved 70 amend tho resolution
as e make Il ~, read II s
SAFE Ahu SeeItpB ~. - III .'.sUS..,i'.,s
are forever proniplteu Titnin w oMsi aIu
the Legislature shall Mtnout ue!hy' Pro'iue
By approptiate ieE hIsI,ian ~ 'Ae uu' en'
ioreemen. o. this p ion.tSn ,l. Al. 49,.
AspendlnE, the mAnulactIte, saie, eio arc
only ptoniolaeu VIM 'u' ''fNU' %
The Judge explained that ne uid thla 10
the interests oil prohibition As now framed;
he did not believe tue aMehnhehL E9uIu
prohibit. II left q loop hoIs Tor easy evasion
n,y,nrp uouSn
Messrs. sayre aud Armstrong opposed this,
which called out from Penny hacker the quot;
a atiSn' Js5 H Hail 1Iso opposed The change
while Judge Brown sustained I, allgding to
the amendment as "RiShy'Talsny Ital ma
Mi; Powell saiu ns TouIu ,Anos ' Th.. ~. ~
not, and hi, change would defeat the meas:
ure ut the polls. lie would rather DO carried
home In his cofln than TO vote to so change
tho lsnguageot the resolution; NJ
Mr.. Psnnyhacker remarked mat MI. Powell
said he was In favor Of prohibition why did
he vote sgalnSt II ~
To this Mr.. Powell retoried Aud you
you vote for n.y.
Mr.. Burt though the amendment GOOD
one. He saw by that blessed paper,
the Registtr, which mas oeen aiIuTea 70 20
kindly by It's party l.enasI hAt AZ I9tneI
efforts at prohibition had been iunie. ne wa
possible,
Mr. Davis another consistent Trend Of
prohibition, favored ths change proposed.