Fort Worth daily gazette. (Fort Worth, Tex.) 1882-1891, 1883-12-13

's '1nuel Lee; Tennessee
Tsyss, A. G. Malloy; Yer
h Hooker; Virginia, n. $
West Virginia, n
sl.,oosin. Elisha Enos
via Bashford; Dakota
r.s. Idaho, q. l.. Shoup
5 B. Eikins; Utah. G
", Washington territory
NV ~ wyoming, j. j.. Cary
sur',o,Inuibia, G. b. Y. Purvis,
,or and corridors of the
So,el are filed this morn.
,msmbers OF the Nationa
committee and delegation.
,,,lc,ls states. The Chicago
,,r confident the convention
u, ,bst city, and say they al
7, enough pledged votes Il
~ result. Cincinnati anC
N. delegates are not Wiling
\ M. though "A few say they
IL surprised If Chicago il
The talk favors Forbes fol
,dtbe committee.
-Tbe National Republican
elected Senator Sabin
and fixed June 3rd rs the
I1Idingthe convention.
animated Sahin of Mime
,nuinent chairman; elected
,r,lbn. Sablu, on taking the
4 while he was deeply sensi.
Distinguished courtesy con
.,p as much surprised rs the
,aId doubtless be, but
s,l parties in the interest OF
Shmony, he accepts what
1,tsssteful position at this
4 init, however, that the
SS.cmmittee will be charac.
tklh. ame unanimity with
lw teen elected. and that
IN .salcn of II Republican
s,yAs BY IA similar unani.
kwsdvvhole country" APP
sijs iia the time for hold.
wat asmtion on Tuesday,
NJ magreed to.
iKiae then submitted his
b. ka new basis of repre-
si1e next convention. but
n Fls laid over 10 allow Il
fse delegation in support
aus OF various sections for
nc0nvention.
1en was adopted providing
sirinan appoint three mem
committee, who, together
Aiinal and secretary, shall
lNmnlittee 10 make arrange
holding the convention.
Bross and State Senator
New York briefly presented
soi Chautauqua for the con-
ming speech by Col. Snow
lllidelphia, the claims OF that
: honor were presented. So
ansylvania was concerned,
y candidate to present, and
ed the Republican party to
; strongest, hest man. The
AZURE Of the Republican plat
hbe the protection of Ameri-
'iry and labor, and it WAS
he convention, which rep
ne party which upheld that
should come 10 the great
. has been built up largely
uence OF that system. The
! should come to the city
party was born aud take n
se In the march to be led on
lection oftbe rights of all
inteed by the constitution.
to him, however, that the
n needed some tinkering in
!, 80 all men should have
Is before the law. and an
&c IN the country for liberty
= If the convention were
llladelphia, ii would have n
iect In the coming cam
aggs of indianapolis then
y the advantages of thnt
place for holding the con-
lIe,Vlewing the hotel and
'les offered there. The Re
= inulhna were earnest, III
ld active, they were aJ
q able as the Republicans
State. Indiana always
llul state, aud would likely
e doubtful In 1854. Should
atlc convention name IA GER
w prominently mentioned,
uld be placed in the center
!, and her Republicans be
, to lead what might be
"iorlorn hope,n but they
nobly. He did not hest
g In 1854 that the electoral
ana would he cast for the
candidate.
ey Of Indiana seconded the
'yor Duggs, claiming that
ON represented "A people
Ne Republican party, will
pa0le of coping with the
ehV. He thought he was
aging the interests of the
ided that the claim OF In
= respectful consideration.
iiterworth of Ohio fol-
support of the claims
all, He suggested the
o ensue 10 the Republican
cling that city for the con-
hclnnati Is not dedicated
uate. The party was ma
'as larger than any man
iiousand men, and If 1t
iuence 10 take away one
us leaders two would not |
march one hour. Ohio
october state. What !
was TO Waterloo; what
was 10 Gettysburg, Ohio
'slicnai battle-ground in |
The Republicans would |
he vantage ground for No |
= = Republican party should
2 October. 1t was doubt
We lost ground cculd be