Clarksville weekly chronicle. (Clarksville, Tenn.) 1873-1890, 1883-03-03
CHArcERY COURT.
The following cases were disposed
of at the last term of The 'Chancery
Cot1rf


81 The following cases were disposed
of at the last term of the 'Chancery
Court:
smith vs.. Ramey- Judgment VS.. j. w
Ferrell VS.. McKeage Judgment VS.. A s
Ussery VS.. outlaw-judgment VS.. ". H.
Sullivan VS.. NJ. Sulllvan-leaye, to amend
bill.
Hart VS.. Pacand-time given to answer
oneal VS. Oldham decree of title to G. c.
Lyle.
Massie vs.. Jordan decree of title to Mrs.
Johnson VS.. Hampton of title to
q. M. Johnson.
johnson VS.. Smith-decree of title TO Mrs.
Madole.
Stacker VS.. Wilcox, Allen VS.. Wilcox and
Roach VS.. Wilcox-receiver appointed and
ordered to rent land.
O'Bryan Bros VS.. Smith-judgment VS.. NJ.
Waller vs.. waggener decree pro confesso
and reference to Q. M.
McRaynoids VS.. Donnelly order ofrefer-
ence on attorneys fees.
Wall VS.. Wall--sale to &. Dinneen con-
firmed.
Grinstead VS., ogburn---former order for
account revived.
yived.
Mari VS.. Toller-death OF q. w. L. Mari
suggested.
Bailey VS.. Judgment VS.. johnson.
HerndOn VS.. WoOten-order for receiver to
report revived.
Hall VS.. Hall-order of sale revived
Allensworth VS.. Reeks-cost taxed to COM
Pardue VS.. Williams reference to G. & NJ,
on taxes.
smith VS.. Villains reference to G. M. ON
taxes.
Batson VS.. Batson-reference to c. & NJ. on
Rice's fee. eEt tt n trF
Goodlett VS. Allel-report sale confirmed.
Randle VS.. Lurton-reference to e. d M.
Neblett VS.. Taylor-decree VS.. compl't for
costs.
Goodlett VS.. Allen-fund ordered paid to
guardian.
Howell VS.. Lindley-death of defendant
suggested and sci. ia. ordered to Issue VS. her
heirs. -
Darden VS.. Darden-reference to G. & M. on
guardian ad Item fees.
johnson VS.. Hampton-order of sale.
Northington VS.. Northington-decree pro
Clinard VS.. Chnard-decree pro confesso..
Humphreys VS.. Smith-report renting
confirmed.
WarfieId VS.. Observation-Disclosures of sale re-
vived.
Gupton VS.. Barbee-report of sale con-
firmed. r4A ~
Phillips VS.. Kendrick-report of C. e.. NJ.
confirmed.
Merritt & Fort VS.. Howard judgment VS.,
Mrs. Humphreys.
Stewart VS.. Stewart-decree pro confesso.
Smith VS.. Ramey-ordef to pay fee OF
Quarles, Daniel & Goodpasture.
Allen vs.. Moseley, sherif-costs taxed to
defendant.
?hilpot VS.. Davie-decree OF title to HAM
baugh d GOodlett. "a
Northington VS.. Northington divorce BILLY
divorce granted complainant.
Batson VS.. BatSon's heirs-order TO pay
Fisher VS.. Fisher divorce bili)-divorce
NNA NlDTr. ont
:. Caldwell VS.. -Dixon-decree of title to
Hamburger & Goodlett.
Haywood VS.. Morris dismissed at COM
plainant's cost. ss-as -. ..-aa
johnson VS.. Sale-order of sale.
Merritt VS.. Johnson-order of sale.
O'Bryan Bros. VS.. j. w. Smith--report on
Co. confirmed.
Frazier VS. Laughren-process ordered to
issue to Cheatham county.
Yates VS.. Yates divorce bill)-prayer for
divorce disallowed.
Merritt VS.. Neblett-decree title to Ham
baugh & Goodlett
pointed guardian ad Item.
> Frazier VS.. Smith-decree title to Ham,
baugh GoOdlett. @9
Frazier VS.. Laugren-decree pro confesso.
ence to c. & M.
johnson VS.. Sale-C.- & Ms report ON
White VS.. White-decree title to Goodlett.
Mcclure VS.. McClure-sale to McKinnOn
confirmed.
johnson VS.. Brown-report of sale con-
firmed.
Darden VS.. Darden-report of commission
ers on partition and report of sale of person.
atty confirmed. Report on debts recon-
mitted.
McReynolds VS.. Donnelly-reports of c. &
NJ: on debts and of sale confirmed.
Hays VS.. Hays divorce bnD-judgment
VS.. defendant for allimony, pendente lite.
Prayer for divorce disallowed.
L.. q N. X. r. Co. VS.. CONTAMINATION of
Goodlett for reference on his fee disallowed,
the Supreme court alone having jurisdiction
Reeves VS. Dixon-ordier of sale.
Bailey VS.. Acknowledgement VS.. john
Laird VS.. Wilson-injunction dissolved.
Griffey VS.. Goodlett-Reference to G. and
NJ.
County VS.. Oneal d Oneal-Dismissed at
cost of complainant.
County VS.. Oneal & Byrd-dismissed at
cost of complainant,
Mckenzie VS.. Quarles, ex'tr.-former order
of sale revived.
Darden VS.. Moore-cause revived in name
Of Wesley Orgain administrator,
made party defendant.
same VS.. Same-reference to Merritt,
special commissioner.
Watts VS.. WattS-Order to pay taxes.
Talliaferro VS.. Bailey-reference to c. and
NJ. on taxes.
Massie VS.. OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES to c. and NJ.
Pardue VS.. Smith-reterence to G. and NJ.
OH taxes.
Killebrew VS.. Murphey-reference to C.
and NJ. on taxes. -r-.
Wall VS.. Wall-reference to c. and NJ. on
taxes.
West vs.. ACKNOWLEDGMENT c. and M.
on taxes.
Merritt and Fort VS.. Hannum-ordered to
pay taxes.
Smith VS.. Bumpus-report sale to have |
con firmed.
Radford VS.. Rogers reference to c. and NJ. |
Dority, Wood & Co., VS.. Edlin-order of
sale.
Lockert VS.. Brackman-order to pay |
taxes.
Smith VS.. Rawlings-bid of Rawlings ad-
vanced 20 per cent.
Darden VS.. Darden-repOrt of T.. and NJ. on |
ices of guardian ad. liteIn confirmed.
sullivan VS.. y. Sullivan-cauSec continued. !
C. & r. turnpike company VS., Dolan-
to Z. and NJ.
Brown VS.. WoOdson-Lurton appointed
guardian ad. litem.
Harper VS.. Bowe-deed from Elizabeth
collins to Eliza BOwe decreed to be null and
void. judgment for costs VS.. defendant.
Bailey VS.. Newman-applicatiOn for re-
,eiver disallowed.
Quarles VS.. Trice-injunction dissolved.
Herring VS.. Tilley-receiver appointed
md ordered to rent out land.
Broaddus VS.. Moore-Feport of special
partly confirmed.
Stewart VS.. observation-disclosures 10 {. and
on taxes. - - |
Lewis VS.. Toombs-sale to Russell con-
irmed, survey ordered.
Stewart vs.. Stewart-(Bill for DiVOrcel |
prayer for divorce diSallowed.
Smith and Pardue VS.. WiIliams-sale to
oardue and Smith confirmed.
McReynolds VS.. Donnelly-notes executed
~ purchaser of realty, ordered cancelled.
Macrae VS.. Rice, BroaGdus ct als-caase
continued to May special term.
Sullivan VS.. NJ. Sullivan-adminiStrat
Of estate transferred to this court.
Sullivan VS.. Conroy-city ordered to
,ay in court $l07:5O, appeal to supreme
;ourt by defendants.
Waller VS.. Waggener-sale ordered. ST.
Bailey VS.. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VS.. defen-
ant as trustee.
Harper VS.. wee. and NJ. ordered to
ollect part of fund.
Merritt and Fort VS.. Observation-Disclosures
8. Mrs. Humphreys vacated. go $50
McMurry VS.. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. pre-
onfesSo and reference to Z. and NJ. - |
Dardin VS.. MoOre-report of e. and NJ.
onfirmed.
Hamburger & g. VS.. Brandon-repOrt of
!. and NJ. confirmed.
Tramwell VS.. Tramwell-final decree of
ale.