The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1883-04-14
~ y, a few woris, adjourned the house of the
eighteenth legislature sine die.

eighteenth legislature sine die.
CAPITAL cHRoyIcLIxGS.
Among the many applications for the
pos'',on OF state engineer are the follow.
ins; william Davis, San Antonio; Thoms,
IL Murray, Mckinney; ]. Ii. Br,ion.
i neiinahi T. IL. Thompson and L. +. Gray,
Charters filed to-day: Pleasant Grove Ga.
operative association, ofDallas county can.
ltal stock, $4,000; Del Rio Building associs,
,,on' the Lone Star lodge, Independen,
order of Sons of Israel, Of Dallas.
day. ''' '''' 'o' "onie 'o'
Ihs genial, painstaking operators here
vApetiehce great reliei, now that the legis.
nature mas adjourned. They deserve special
meh'Vh Tor the rapidity, care aud correct
ness they have exercised in Transmitting
sne Hreat mass OF legislative proceedings
uotn manuscript necessarily hastily gotten
up py the reporters, and the Western Union
% 70 oe congratulated ON having such ex.
Veueht gentlemen and careful operators AS
they have here at Austin.
THE COURTS,
supreme ecourt-Atiirmed: Williamson AZ
al' vs.; Connor, from Lamar county; Somers
vs. ieterson, from Dallas county. Re.
yersed and remanded: Russell ct al. VS..
freeman q Co., from Navarro county.
otepnehs vs. Carraway, from Fannin coun.
W, hilue et al, vs., Leather, from Montague
ooui''y, anu brounson VS.. LLOYD, Scanlan
w az, rom walker county affirmed as TO
SNsInmel, reversed and remanded as 10
Rainwater, Morrell VS.. Bartlett at al
rom hed River county; motion for rehear.
ing overruled and leave given 10 amend
motion as motion for rehearinr within
twenty Gays, Willie, c. j. not sitting. Sub.
m'tied on nriet for both parties Loving
~ AZ; VS.. Milllkin, from Parker county:
Nandegrai VS.. Percy, from Parker
county; Clayton vs.. Kendall N
Emery, from Parker county; CLAYTON
vs. RANDALL " Darling, from Parker county,
olayton VS., Brown, from Parker county
dayton vs.. Benedict Il Co., from p Puker
county; Tatum VS.. Harris ct al. from Col.
I'm county, Taylor VS.. Campbell, from Col.
I'm county; Trnitt vs.. Blandell, from CLAY
county; Sanger Bros. ct al. VS.. Oglesby
rom Collin county; Bumpass ct al. VS.
spencer OF al, IRON Dallas county; Horn.
PACK ct al. vs. Ellers, from Wise county.
ralefileld VS.. Harper, from Ellis county;
ray et I'll. VS.. Queen Insurance company
rom 1rayson county; Reeks vs.. Smith OF
m'; rom nailas county. On briefs OF ap.
pehahls' thompson ct al. VS.. Comstock ct
VI Hoih wise county Whitlow VS.. Result
OF Elections, from Wichita county; Jones and
wiie vs. Carver, from Dallas county; Evans
Y Martin VS.. Tucker, FROM Wise county,
submitted on oral arguments and briefs for
ooth parties; Andrews ct al. VS.. Andrews
rom Ellls county. Submitted on briefs for
1 potn parties and argument Tor appellee
lexas & Pacific Railroad vs. Levi Bros.
rom Dallas county; Texas L. Pacific Rail.
way vs. Dye ct al, from Dallas county,
Texas u Pacific Railway VS.. Burns, from,
larrant county; Texas Il Pacific Railway
vs.. Howard and wife, from Tarrant county
Un motion to affirm: Browder ct al. VS.
Ryan ct al, from Dallas county. On mo
non TO dismiss Dewey vs.. Gillespie, from
TTrant county,