The Baltimore County union., 1883-12-08

Judge Ycllott delivered the charge TO the Grand
Jury, and stated that he knew Of no special mat.
tiers Of Importance TO communicate 90 tho Jury.
In n county rs large as this violations Of law are
committed, but mono of n fragrant character Mt
this time. II will be the duty Of the Jury 60 visit
the county Jail and examine the books Of the
Treasurer Of the county.
On the call Of the trial docket the following
entries were made: Peabody Heights Company
vs. Philip X. Saitier for defendants for costs.
Charles Shipicy vs. james Harris, for plaintiff for
property described in tho mar one cent damages
and costs. In the following cases judgments by
default were entered Stephen Keys vs. Jacob d.
and Jacob Sellers 8. W. Brunker a Co. W. Bald
win Myers the National Mechanics Bank Of
Baltimore vs. Geo. Warner for Sj65.6s: Henry ID.
Schmidt W. y. Nelson Matthews; james T.. Cop
page W.. Edward l.. Bacon William q. Wetheral
vs.. Richard J. Lucas; james Ilallctt q Co. vs..
Frederick Neir John j. Anderson, trustee, and
others vs.. John Holmes; Frederick Rice ct al.
trustees. vs.. George Warner; Wilson, Colston 4
Co. ". John e. Cross; George X. FRESHMAN vs..
George n. Goldman for $i66.26; Henry Depkin
vs. II. u. Clayton; Isaac :. Marks vs.. George
MitEei. ttWo cases y Benz. d. Porter vs. John C..
Wartman, executor Of Dorothy 4. wartman, for
Si.1s3.5l. sheeler a Ripple vs. Louis A. Smith.
Judgments by confession were entered in the fol-
lowing cases WIN. J. c. King a Son vs. Ida v.
and ". Frank Mitchell Manufacturers' National
Bank Of Baltimore vs.. Charles NJ. and Caroline
Herr. The following cases were removed Jas.
A. Everitt vs.. John W. Molti 4 Co., by plaintiff
20 the Superior Court Of Baltimore City; Jacob
Aigire vs. baltimore and Hanover Railroad Com.
pany, 90 Circuit Court for Carroll County. The
trial docket will be taken up on Monday next,
December 10. Assignment of cases for that day:
Nos u. 25, %, IS. 20. 30. 80. ~. SO, 81. SO,
81, 53l. IS. Sd. 81 So, 50. 60. 81, 90. 63 and g.
On the original docket the following judgment
has been rendered: Milton W. oHatt vs. Patrick
Mcilone, for 5000.
Daniel Malkler, claimant Of property, &c., vs..
Selisman lIerzberg; judgment below for lierzberg
affirmed.
For the second time jury in the case X. D..
Sclby vs.. Lewis Stumpf failed TO agree. The
amount involved IL So and the costs 10 the county
now aggregate nearly or quite $500.
The case Of WIN. Margraf W. Charles Young
and Conrad Yockel. was concluded, and the judg.
ment below for Young and Yoekei Of so was 70
vcrsed. Robt. sehunek vs. Karl ioppa, below
for Iioppa iorsl9.o2; appeal dismissed. Andrew
stangler W. Daniel Malone, below for Malone for
s33.l2; appeal dismissed. Adam Seiig and wife
vs. Chas Sorg. below for Sorg for $50; dismissed.
stoppeiA. Peregoy W. Jehn W. Royston, executor,
below for Royston for SOS reversed. Robert
Hooper W. Mary Watkins. below, for Watkins for
~; appeal desmissed. Mary Jane Bixler ct al.
administrators, vs. John II. wisner Judgment
non pros. Luther A. Martin W. Mary 4. Royston;
same W. Susan ShultE same vs. keziah Arma-
cost same W. Richard A. Martin In each ofthese
cases Judgment was obtained below against Luther
A. Martin for STT.76, and q motion was made 20
quash the proceedings, because the action was
brought TO recover q sum Of money alleged TO be
due the parties as their portion Of an estate by
dhtribution against Martin individually, when Il
should have been against him as administrator.
The court entertained this view Of the case and
quashed the proceedings. James NJ. Biilingsley
". Mrs. Frances c. Coekey. judgment below for
Mrs. Cockey for $50 appeal dismissed. John
schultheis W. Albert Fisher, judgment below for
Fisher for s62 appeal dismissed. Same vs. John
Ratsenmeycr. Judgment below for katzenmeyer
for $50 appeal dismissed.