Morning journal and courier., 1883-02-07
The Court Record.
United States District Court

The next term of the United States District court for Connecticut will be held in this
 city February 27th, and the following have
 been drawn as jurors:
 Egbert B. Buell., Essex; Benjamin F. Lam-
 phere, Goshen Edward Gayer, Bridgeport; !;
 Jacob MaiIhouse, New Haven; Thomas
 S. Upson, Waterbury; Andrew Jack
 son, Guilford; Thomas Guyer, Nor
 walk; Ely Sanford, Bethany James M.
 Hallock, New Milford William H. Mack,
 East Haddam Legrand ". Keeler, Wilton j; Andrew Eagan, Newtown; Sherman Bots
 ford, Newtown Augustus H. Bartholomew,
 Wallingford; David Andrews, Westport ;
 Albert W. Peck, Newtown; Lucius M. Nun
 roe, New Canaan Joseph B. Todd, Bethany;
 John Reed, Sharon; Daniel Harris, Middle
 town.
 All United States court cases with State
 prison penalties have to be indicted by 8
 grand jury, and at the coming term, Dart,
 the Hartford mail robber, will be subject
 for indictment. Below is a list of the grand
 jurors:
 Vincent Collier, Darien; John W. Sumner,
 Bolton; W. O. Sanford, Weston; Reuben Lord, Lyme; Morgan G. Bulkeley, Hartford
 John H. Scranton, Willimantic; Benjamin T. Clark, Orange; Charles Blair, Canton w. L. Palmer Cromwell; Jeremiah Olney, Thompson George F. Selleck, New Haven o. W. Stow, Southington; Jerome Tourte- lotte, Putnam George s. Burnham, Hart J. Griswold; A. C. Hendrick, New Haven i; J. s. Forsyth, Hartford; Alfred A. Young, Jewett City; E. H. Bugbee.- Killingly; Will liam H. Tubbs, New London; I. T. Rogers, Milford - s. B. Newberry, Bloomfield i;
 James NJ Benton, Morris; s. P. Piereon, Trumbull; Charles B. Wheeler, Monroe; H D. Barrows, Marlborough. Superior COurU-Civ1l SIde-JUdge Am drews
 This court came in yesterday morning at l 10 o'clock.
 In this court yesterday the case of Fowler vs. Fowler was resumed and concluded in ! the afternoon.
 In the case of Smith vs. McKeon & Todd, | recently tried, judgment was rendered for the defendant on the complaint and on the first count of the cross -comp plaint also for the de- 1 fendant; on the second count of the counter l claim, for the plaintiff. This was suit to recover damages for 8 breach of contract.
 The judgment inRfavor of the defendant was l for $333.94 and costs, and for the plaintiff in | issue in his favor for his costs. 1 Court of Common PIeas-Judge Torrance This court will resume again this morning, | when the oyster case of Rowe vs Smith will be further heard.
 City Court-ol ImInaI sIde-Judge stud- ley.
 Robert M Park, violation of city ordi-
 nance judgment suspended; Dennis M. Lucey, neglecting family, to March 6 Edward Hamilton, resisting Officer Lanigan, thirty days in jail, $6.18 costs; Patrick Shaugh- rove breach of the peace, thirty days in jail, $5 33 costs; Michael Naughton, breach of the peace against George Streit, $5 fine, l $11.55 costs; Edward Lee, same, $5 fine, | $11.55 costs.
 Court Notes. The Supreme Court of Errors has decided
 the suit of Wright vs. the City of Hartford | In favor of the city. This was the friendly
 suit brought to test the constitutional amend ment whether fremen were public officers
 and could receive additional pay during their
 term of office By this decision they are not
 allowed to receive any additional pay for | services during their continuance in office. Mayor BuIkeley vetoed the bill granting the fremen more pay on this ground. It was
 then suggested that a..friendly suit be brought to test the question.