The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1883-04-11

producers are unfortunate this year, in the
tact that their large production has fallen
upon such sluggish markets for goods.
There has been of course still further
increase in receipts at the ports during the
month of March. The total port receipts
are now 1865 CSC bales greater than in ISL
50, and 2IO,5G bales larger than in the pre-
vious season. Taking the ports separately,
the largest increase per cent in the receipts
of this year over last year is shown AZ Gal
weston, where the excess this year to April
is SS} per cent. New Orleans follows with
81 per cent; Norfolk, y per cent; Mobile,
- per cent; West Point, etc, 80 per cent;
Charleston, 10 per cent, and Savannah, 10
per cent; while Wilmington shows de-
crease OF about per cent, compared
with last crop, Foreign exports during
the month reached 5O3 go bales, against
4Ol ,66l bales last year, and Isl 100 in 1850
81, the total increase Tor the season being
l.O32, 325 bales over ISL 50 and 800 ,Hl5 over
the same period in the preceding year.
Port stocks on April were II, 100 bales less,
and interior stocks about $1,000 bales
greater than last season.
The increase in the amount of cotton
marketed during the first seven crop
months of 1925 is seen to be %. SSl
bales over lSSl-S2 and 1923 bales over
lSN.Sl.
Northern spinners had up to April /
taken ,i3l ,9S1 bales, an increase over the
corresponding period of lSSl-S2 of III, 22G
bales, and an increase over the same
months of lSSO-Sl OF p $50 bales.
The increased movement mp 20 this date
of the present year is 1915, l2l bales, as
compared with lSS0-Sl, As we remarked
last month the marketing during the latter
year has hitherto most closely compared
with the present season. Hence it is OF in
terest to add the increase already indicated
to the actual crop of that year, BY doing
so it appears that the total production tins
season would be 0Gl 600 bales-that is to
say, the yield would reach that figure if
there is no further increase or decrease in
the movement for the remaining months OF
this season compared with the same months
OF 1880 81.
For the week ending April the total re
ceipts have reached IS 7US bales, against
So $3.50 bales last week, lO5 Oj2 bales the pre-
yious week and III, lSl bales three weeks
since; making the total receipts since the
LIST of September, 1852, 5,lOS 400 bales,
against 335, l07 bales for the same period
OF lSSl-S2, showing an increase since Sep
TENDER l, 1852, of ,O73, 1888 bales.
Figures indicate an Increase in the cotton
in sight tonight OF 395, 30 bales as COM
pared with the same date of 1882, an in
crease of 267, 80 bales as compared with the
corresponding date of 1881, aud an increase
Of ,SGl bales as compared with 1850.
The totals show that the old interior
stocks have decreased, during the week l.,
$50 ba'es, and are tonight - Isl bales
more than NJ the same perlOd last year,
The receipts at the same towns have been
lG31l bales more than the same week last
year, and since September the receipts at
all the towns are Gi3 o23 bales more than
Tor the same tine in ISL.
1t will be seen by the above TINT the in
crease in amount in sight tonight, MS com.
pared with last year, is 81 ,3S2 bales, as
compared with lSSO-Sl, is 439 j5S bales, and
with lS79-S0, l,0l9Gi6 bales.
Statements show that the receipts since
September up TO tonight are now ,0S2,-
S95 bales more than they were to the same
day of the month in 1852 and 2G9, 7J6 bales
more than they were TO the same day of the
month in 1881,
The total receipts from the plantations
since September |, 1882, were 5Gi0 l57
bales; in lSSl-62, were 800 ,G26 bales; in
lSsO-Sl were j,ili S3i bales. The receipts
at the out-ports the past week were 7S,7 OS
bales; the actual movement from plaDta-
tons was only 6S,SSJ bales, the balance be-
ing taken from the socks at the interior
towns. Last year he receipts from the
plantations for the same week were q ,22g
bales, and for 1881 they were 6, I3S bales.
The movement up to April shows an
increase in the average weight as compared
with the same periods of the last two years,
the average this year being 1906 pounds
per BALE against 1880 pounds per bale ioI
the same time in lSSl-S2, and 4SS0i in
lSSU.Sl,