Weekly Phoenix herald. [volume] (Phoenix, Maricopa County, Ariz. Territory [Ariz.]) 1882-1896, 1883-04-05
Territorial District COuit t.
CRIMINAL CASES

=. Baker; Attorney Tor defendant
Territorial District Count.
CRIMINAL CASES.
Territory of Arizona VS.. Miguel
Lavardie; indicted for robbery. On
charge Of venue from Yuma county
District Attorney A. G. Baker Tor
prosecution.
Territory of Arizona VS.. John SUIT
ton; indicted for robbery. On charge
of venue from Yuma county. Dis
trici Attorney a. e. Baker for prose
cution.
Territory of Arizona VS.. w. T.
Smith; keeping unlicensed gambling
table. Appealed from Justices Cour'.
District Attorney A. c. Baker for
prosecution, Porter & Malay AMI
Cox 81 Campbell Tor defendant.
Territory of Ariz' ma vs.. City IF
Ph9nix,a corporation; obstructing
street b. f"oding. Appeal, d from
Justices Court District Attorney
A. c. Baker for prosecution; Porter
& Malay, Tweed & Hancock, Cox u
Campbell, and A. D. Lemon for de-
fctdant.
Territory of Arizona VS.. H. E.
SleSser; obsu uc;ing roads by flood
ing. Appealed from Justices Court.
District Attorney A. G. Batter for
plain iff; Porter s. Malay for dc
PENDANT.
CIVIL. CASES.
Chas. E. Philes, Tbos. Fl. Blair
and Henry D. Polhemus VS.. VIM w
Hickies; 10 set aside deed for min
ing property and for damages. Con-
tinued from last term. Lemon u
McC abb for plaintiff; Tweed Il Han
cock for defcndcut.
Dolores dc Peral.a VS.. r. F. Kirk
land, administrator Of the estate of
Frank PurcelIa, deceased, and M. L..
Peralta; on promissory note. AT.
torreys for plaintiff, Alsap & Baker !;
Attorneys for defendant, -
Chas. Altschull VS.. L. =. Wash !;
for balance Of account. Tweed &
Hancock, Attorneys for plaintiff;
A lsap 81 Baker, Attorneys for defend
ant.
Jeriah Wood VS.. Amanda Wood /;
divorce. Cox s. Campbell, fer plain
tiff; - defendant.
Lydia A. Craig VS.. John w. Craig ;
divorce. Cox & Campbell, Attorneys
for plaintiff; Attorney for defend
ant, -.
Wilson w. Jones vs.. Trinidad
Palma and Librada Palma; foreclos-
ure of mortgage. Tweed s. Hancock
for plaintiff; defendant.
NJ. Wormser VS.. W A. Rowe, j. s.
Drew and BENZ. Belcher, under tie
firm name of W. A. Rowe & Co !;
sui; for balance on account. Lemon
s. McCabe for plaintiff; Alsap &
| Baker for defendant.
l.. H. Orme VS.. j. s. Drew; suit
on account. Lemon 81 McCahe for
plaintiff; Alsap & Baker for defend
ant.
s. E. Patton VS.. Geo. E. Brown
and Carrie Brown, his wife; fore
closure of mechanics lien. AlsAp
s. Baker for plaintiff.
Territory of Arizona and County
of Maricopa VS.. John George and J
NJ. Bryan; forfeited recognizance.
Territory of Arizona and County
of Maricopa vs.. John George a, d
Geo. R. Roberts; forfeited recog-
nizance.
VIM. Koshland VS.. L. H. Orme
replevin. Tweed s. Hancock for
plaintiff; Al.ap & Baker for defend
| ant.
R. F. Kirkland, administrator of
the estate of Francisco Purcella, de-
ceased, VS.. James Murphy; suit for
debt. Alsap & Baker for plaintitf :;
Tweed & Hancock for defendant.
Mary II. Sullivan VS.. David Ncahr !;
injunction. Alsap s. Baker for plain
if; H. N. Alexander for defendant
F. NJ. Fowler vs.. E. w. Bryan and
T. J. Bryan; ej~ctment. Tweed Sc
Hancock, Porter & Mlllay, ard Cox
& Campbell for plaintiff; Alsap &
Baker for defendant.
Henry Morgan, surviving partner
of the firm of H Morgan & Co., vs..
Geo. F. Coats, J. NJ. Bryan and
Emanuel Mayer; on bond. Alsap
s. Baker for plaintiff; Tweed s. Han
cock for defendant.
A. A. p. Fitzgibbons VS.. W. W.
Hickies; suit on account. Cox &
Campbell for plaintiff; Tweed &
Hancock for defendant.
Chas. Main and Ezra H. Winches-
ter, copartners doing business under
the firm name and style of Main s.
Winchester, VS.. Chas. T. Hayden
suit on account. Alsap s. Baker TO
plaintiff; defendant,
Nettie Steele vs.. VIM. Steele; di-
vorce. Alsap s. Baker for plaintiff;
defendant, -.