National Republican., 1883-07-06
THE COURTS.
The Business Transacted In the VnrsoUis
Legal Tribunals Yesterday.
TWO DIVORCE SUITS FILED.

TWO DIVORCE SUITS FILED.
A.. B. Williams as attorney for Rose Nc
Kenney, filed bill for divorce from James
McKcnney. They were married on April
26, 1876, ono child being born TO them, of
which she asked the custody and the restora-
tion of her maiden name, Rose Downing. She
charges desertion and failure to support. She
also charges adultery vt divers times and
places.
S. p. Jordan, by his attorney, Charles Pei
ham, yesterday entered suit for divorce from
Lizzie b. Jordan. They were married on
March 8, 1859, and lived together until two
years ago, when the. defendant willtully and
without cause deserted and has continued TO
live apart from him since.
ANOTHER INJUNCTION ASKED AGAINST THE
b. AND =. X. r..
w. c. Bambergor, through his attorneys,
Messrs. Hagner and Maddox, yesterday filed
bill in equity against tho Baltimore and
Potomac Railroad company to restrain that
company from using its tracks on Maryland
avenue, so as TO discommode him on the east
side of Tenth street. A temporary restrain
ing order was granted returnable July IL.
MISCELLANEOUS.
The case of Mrs. Emma &. ID. Nickcrson
against A. Ii. Nickerson, Lena ID. Carter, and
Others for receiver and injunction has been
set for tomorrow.
l. The charges against Is. If. Bigolow for en-
bezzlement has been set for trial to-day in the
criminal court.
Arthur A. Birney and wife yesterday en-
tered suit against James Robbins andwife for
tpartition of lot G, James A. Robbinss sub
division of lot 16, square 2S3.
THE RECORD.
Circuit Court-JttdOe MdcArthur-Popper VS.
Dammann; Judgment by default, Miller VS.
Miller first on sci ia. Beardson " Co. VS.. Mix
Judgment by default. Brewster y Co. VS.. Bliss
same. Jesselcohn " Co. VS.. Silverbery; same
Humphries IL Co.; motion for judgment denied
Ryneal IT,, vs. Schutter; Judgment by default
Joyce and Miller VS.. Nnilor; same. Hurley VS.
Joseph bill of exceptions argued. ,McCullougl
vs. Graft; case continued to settle bill of eXcep
tions. Plain & Co. VS.. Nichols order of publica
ton. United States, use OF, VS.. Somersmith mo
ton to enter judgment. ODay VS.. Nansant; oil
OF exceptions signed. Moses VS.. Howgate mo
ton to auash and condemn. Boteler VS.. Bliss e
al; Judgment by default. Thurber Go. VS.. Cor
nell: same. Miller and Gager VS.. harrington
Judgment by default Adjourned until to-day
Eguiiv Cort-Judgc Jdnes.-Mason VS.. Mason
pro conicsso VS.. w. d. Mason. Murphy vs. Wash
; lngton; order OF publication amended; Birney vs.
Robbins; hearing of motion liked for July IL
Noyes VS.. Gray; sales confirmed. herman vs.
Herman; S. r. Thomas appointed trustee TO con
vey Nickerson vs. Nickerson; fixed for Satur
day. Bamberger VS.. Baltimore and Potomac Ran
way company restraining order returnaDle July II
Van Haake VS.. Van Haake; attachment retuTna
bic July 0. CULLEN VS., CULLEN: referred TO ). !
Riley to take proof Worthington vs. Randall
pro confesso VS.. G. c. Randall. Richards "
, Richards testimony ordered taken before j.
Reilly. Reiter VS. Reiter; appearance of abser
, defendant Kenny VS.. Kenny same Bell W
Wilkinson; decree modified. Roys VS.. Roys; me
Q ton for rule. Dayton vs.. Dayton sales nnali
ratified. Alley VS.. Quinter submitted. Citizen
. Bank VS.. Tanning; sales ratified. Adjourne
until to day.