The Wellington enterprise. [volume] (Wellington, Ohio) 1867-188?, 1883-11-07
Court Proceedings.
Iupar GREEN. rnrsrpna.
The following are the Court proceedings
for the week ending October 9th:

The following are the Court proceedings
for the week ending October 9th:
CIVIL DOCKET.
Caroline Mussey vs.. George E. BrowneI; con-
| tinued
Board of Education of Florence Township vs..
| o. Root; settled and costs paid.
Horr, Warner & Co. vs.. d. L. Pope & Son; dis
continued at PLAINTIFF costs. No record
r. d. Sigsworth vs.. j. NJ. Hesser; discontinued
| without prejudice.
Mary Erman VS.. George Parsons; dropped from
docket at plaintiffs cost.
Frank Mitchell vs.: Benjamin Moore; discon-
tinued without prejudice.
Frank E. Bronson VS.. Village Of oberlin; con-
tinued
L. B. Smith vs.. T. B. Matthews; continued.
Ohio ex rel Emma Smith John Smith; dis
continued for want Of prosecution.
Joel Hall VS.. David Adams; settled and costs
paid.
Moses Peabody VS.. John sigsworth; settled at
| plaintiff s cost.
Milo Harris, administrator, vs. E. E. Mussey ct
al; continued.
Ohio ex rel A. Manning William Schroeder;
dropped from docket.
David Kenaston VS.. the Amazon Insurance Com
pany; default; Judgment for plaintiff 8, $3.50.
c. c. Humphrey Ira Whitney ct al; settled
and costs paid.
David ]. Hoar & Co VS.. Schumacher, Carney &
Co.; default; Judgment for plaintiff S6e0.S2-
Merinda Brown VS.. Sheppard Brown ct al; con-
tinued at defendants cost
N. B. Gates VS.. 81. G. Wilcox ct al; Judgment
for platntif S226-57.
N. B. Gates VS.. h. c. Wilcox ct al; Judgment
for plaintiff S2ie.46.
N. B. Gates We. b. C. Wilcox ct al; Judgment
for plaintiff $22546
George w. Quigiey VS.. William d. Mead ct al. I;
sale confirmed and deed ordered.
Fannie Haines VS.. Ruma Osgood ct al. default; I;
decree for plaintiff; due plaintiff ss56-so.
William A. Braman, trustee, Va. g. R. Parker ct
al; decree and order Of sale.
John webber vs. Maggie Lescher ct al guardian
and litem appointed for minor defendAnts parti-
tion ordered; plaintiff elects to take premises at
appraised value and deed ordered.
Horr, Warner q Co. vs. Peter Oster; default;
Judgment for plaintiff S222.5S.
L. B. Smith vs.. F. A. and E. j. Moran; judg-
ment for plaintiff S22i -
Thad h Rowland vs. A. B. Johnson; verdict for
]. W. Hart VS.. ]. T. Deeg ct al; dismissed at de-
fendants' cost.
N. z. Lampman VS.. sobina H. Wright; verdict
for plaintiff $s6.s7.
CRIMINAL DOCKET.
The following were among the indict-
ments found by the grand jury, last week:
Ohio vs. J,mes Stone, James Quinn and VIM.
Craig; rape, and assault with intent to commit
rape.
Ohio VS.. August Kuhlo; larceny.
Ohio vs.. Spencer Emmons and Charles Morgan;
permitting games to be played.
Ohio vs.. Van Ber Nor; selling liquor TO persons
intoxicated, etc
Ohio vs.. Michael O'Brien; same charge.
Ohio vs.. Michael McClorey; same charge.
Ohio vs.. John Howard; selling liquor to minor.
Ohio Va. Charles Frank and Carl Frank; carrying
on an offensive trade.
Ohio vs.. Robert Bruce; murder in the first de-
gree
Ohio vs. Augustus F. Tirey and John Young;
murder in the first degree.
Ohio vs. Augustus +. Tirey and John Young;
burglary.
Ohio vs.. Augustus F. TREY; assault with intent
to kill
The case of Rowland VS.. johnson was
hotly contested, the jury having disagreed
at the other trial. Four days were occu-
pied in the trial, one day being consumed
in the arguments by Messrs E. G. johnson
and Judge Blandin for the plaintiff, and
Judge Hale and Geo. p Metcalf for the
defendant. The verdict for the defendant
was what those expected who heard the
testimony.
The other case that was finished on
Tuesday, Lampman VS.. Wright, grew out
of the non-payment of rent by defendant,
who occupied the Lake Breeze House for
two years, and claimed damages by reason
of the premises not being in good repair.
Verdict as above.