Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1883-03-09
WINDSOR COUNTY SUPkEnE
COURT.
The Cases Argued and the Decision

The Cases Argued and the Decisions.
The term of Supreme Court for Windsor
county began n Woodstock Feb. 22d before
Judges Ross Powers Neaaey aad Rowcll.
GA call of the docket 81 cases were marked
for hearing. The cases Of Paul Cummings
VS.. Oliver Holt, the same vs. Holt, d. Tar
bell vs. d. c. Jones, j. W. Reynolds vs.. +.
n. IIassom, Ilurtand vs.. iIacket and c. NJ.
Williams VS.. Osgood, and otheis town of
St. Adams v. National Car company, and
village of st. Adams VS.. National Car COM
pany. Others were con- nucl to the gen
eral term. In the cases Of Perry vs.. Promo
AMI Stod,lard VS. 5. d. No. in Audover,
judgment was affirmed without argument
Town of lIartlaud VS. John CIRCUITS estate
heard at February term, 1882, judgment of
County Court for plaintiff was affirmed; W.
+. johnson for plaintiff; n. Paul for de
PENDANT,
In cases heard this tcrm the following de
cisions were announced: In Promo aud
wife vs., Hewitt Judgment Of County Court
for plaintiffs was affirmed, holding that
property bought by II wife with money OF
tanned by her from an insurance effected by
her on the husbands homestead was exempt
from attachment by the husbands creditors,
Ross, Judge. French and Southgate for
pliintiiT; n. Paul for defendant.
Case of Thomas :. Cloligh and wife vs.
William W. Clough judgment Of county
court for plaintiff was affirmed Lamb and
Tarbcll for plaintiffs S. NJ. Pingrec for de-
PENDANTS.
Oscar Smith appointment VS.. William n.
Holden, judgment of county court on report
for plaintiff was reversed and judgment rem
dcred for defendant. l.. NJ. Reed for plain
TIL J. l.. Martin for defendant
Clark ii. Chapman vs. Christopher W..
Goodrich, judgment of the county court on
report for defendant was reversed and judy
ment rendered for plaintiff for $3.50 and in
terest. Sticiney for plaintiff g. A. Davis
for defendant.
Austin and Adams VS.. William II. Ed
munds, appellant, judgment of county
court for plaintiff reversed and case re-
manded-hcld that u special count on prom
issory note payable 10 bearer and setting
forth that it had been lost was insufficient
and NJ recovery could he had thereon. Pow
ers j., Lamb and rarbell for plaintiff; Will
son for defendant.
Joseph Ellis vs.. Geo W. Cleaveand, i udg-
nent oil county court for plaintiff reversed
aud cause Icmanded for error in admission Of
testimony at the trial before the jury. Bliss
aud Wilson for plaintiff, lluntOn and StiCkney
Tor defendant
Luce W. Hoising,on, known as the stag
case pleading Of defendant held insufficient,
judgment of county court reversed and cause
remanded, n. Paul for plaintiff, g, A. Da
Wis for defendant,
John Buckley VS.. Russell Jarvis iudg-
ment OF county court on report for plaintiff
affirmed VIM Batchclder for plaintiff, G
a. Davis and II. W. Parker for defend
ant.
VIM. W. Dennis vs.. Oscar n. St0ughton
judgment OF county court for plaintiff revers
ed, judgment for defendant for costs. LIANT
aud Turbell for plaintiffs Denisons for &c
PENDANT.
Aaron y. King VI. VIM. J. Tarbell judg
mrnt Of county court for plaintiff affirmed
Llnb and Tarbell and Denisons for plaintiff
liuntun aud Stickney Tor defendant.
Worcester and Woodruff vs. L. &. Lam
soni judgment OF county court for plaintiff
affirmed. G. a. Davis for plaintiff, VIM
Balchclder for defendant.
Charles Hall and others VS.. town o.
Haiti ,ud; Alpheus Atwood and others VS.
town of Chester, heard together the question
involved being the same
Judgment OF the county court reverse,
and suit dismissed. Paul Il Fletcher TO
plaintiff; johnson for defendants.
Administrator of Ira Mathewson's eslat,
court for plaintiff that declaration suflicien
affirmed. Stickney Il Goddard for plaintiff
Hutton X Stickncy for defendant.
Milton Garrish vs. VIM L. Bragg. De
cree of Chancellor for orator affirmed. $
L. Pingrec X j. f. Colby for orator. n
Paul for defendant
Chester DOwncr vs. II. & NJ. Morse De
cree OF Chancellor for orator affirmed
French " Southgatc for orator, Bliss 70
defendant.
Otis Chmberlin vs.. Henry Estey an,
others. Decree ou the bill affirmed caus
remanded with mandate Chamberlin
French X Soutbgatc and Paul for orator
johnson &BIrrctt, for defendants
Charles Morgan VS.. &. ii. kidder and 5
Robinson judgment Of county court 70
plaintiffs affirmed. Held lhut in an action
Of trover by mortgagce against parties VIII
bought mortgagcd personal property of tn
morigagor the defendants will not be allow
ed TO show in mitigation Of damages tina
the money paid by them for the propert,
was paid over by the mortgagor to the mort
gage and endorsed on the mortgage note il
part payment thereof, the mortgage no
conserving to the gale or releasing his claim
on the property.
That the mortgage has right to hold al
his security until the mortgage debt is full,
paid. Veazey, j., Bliss, Hunton and Stick
ney for plaintiffs. j. j. Wilson for defend
PENDANTS.
George G. Gregg VS., Town of Weathers
field judgment for defendant affirmed. G
y. Davis for plaintiff; Pingry and johnson
for defendant.
G. F. Drury VS. John W. Titus judgmen
for plaintiff affirmed. Johnson for plaintiff
Seaver for defendant.
Dudley G. Denison VS. Geo. A. Henr,
and another, decree of chancellor for orato
affirmed Wilson and j. ID. Denison for or
ators llunton aud Siickney for defendant
Court adjourned March LIST, several case
remaining with the court.