The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1883-11-01

VII ~ shipped lhf1HfH tom VHIfFIINn
over fhN Houston 4 fffH tAnlfal M EaHtl
irHh ahd Transferred nom ne bf4nohto fbo
ffnhh q kaufman Sun
W0fbgfftt WnhnGi
jnst Al this lime ihefe Il Hfea' amount
of iight bel6e ibea ilpon The farm question
w the country pffss, Sons hayr disoov.
cred that M. Randall IA q republican IN
disguise and N not worthy tbe supnoft ~
tho democracy, There Ia wonderful
amount 0f wisdom stored away that 10 now
and Will be brought TO- the suffnce- wills
Point Chronicle,
rHg srEAR KRsnfr.
DO those papers that are denounolbe Sam
| Randa for his s0. called protection views,
propose TO make the MISTER party iesue}
! If so, what will they do with Senator Vor-
hees, Of Indianb? What disposition Will
they make al Hewitt and Shelley, Of Als-
bama? What is 10 become OF the LOuisi-
ana Democrtic memoef What about the
Ohio democracy, pledged TO a tariff for rev.
enue2 What about the North Carolina
member? Are all these members 70 be
"iead outof the party Are these dis'in,
guished leaders OF the democracy to be
forced into the republican ranks? This
would he a hard matter to acc1mp lish.
Yet, such would be the case II q lot OF these
ultra free trade papers and politicians had
their way. No, gentlemen, you cannot
make this question party issue. The re-
publicaus are tickled half to death at what
you say. and sincerely hope that you Will
make II party issue. For well they know
That should such be the case, the party
would be split into atoms, aud they gain
an easy victory in the next presidential
contest, If We wish TO elect democratic
president-apd we suppose all true demo
Gratis do let us Ego SLOW" and see 10 II
that We do not give the republicans stick
with which to break our heads. Let every
man he protectionist, free trader, ol
what not, but do not attempt to gag him
because he does not subscribe to the views
, that you yourself may held. The party
needs friends, and in place of reading mel
out OF the party'' because other undivided
views, we had best let them stay with US
, and try and "read mere OF the people into
the ariy."-TGeorgetosn Record.
ROASTING.
Tha policy of the Houston Post in con
tinualy boasting OF its pecuniary ability
and therefore its power is disgusting more
Journals in the state than the The Times,
and reflection on the part of the Post ought
TO check that habit, If its sense OF propriety
rails to do so The former owner OF the
Post had money, and invested it In the
Post. The paper was praised, and compll-
mented, aud il appeared to be on the high
way to fortune, but reverses came, and
when the balance sheet was struck II was
found that 500 COO had been sunk by The
best paper" the peoples favorite." and
all that sort of gibberlsh which has come to
be perfectly understood by everybody.
The Houston Telegraph, az one lime tue
most popular paper in Texas, came finally
ans financially to grief, IN the same city OF
Houston, because-we!l never mind the
reasons. they can be given if necessity re-
uuires that should be done. The boast OF
wealth by the Post may suit the immediate
latitude and locality in which it exists, and
SO far as the city, from which it takes its
name is concerned the Pos may not be
Offensive. but pride often PROCEEDS fall,
aud if those who have the conduct of that
journal would be on the safe side, they will
De little more modest in their pretensions.
Il San Antonio Times.