Seattle daily post-intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1883-11-07
Tine posT-INTElticEHcER PUB. co.
Seattle, June 10 1883.
CouRT rRoCEgD,Ncs.

Court met pursuant 10 hulourumcu
The jury in the case Of the Ierritor
Vi. ii. u. Fox, returned verdict G
guilty.
The Jury WAS discharged from ia
case and defendant gave notice of
motion for Bew trial.
c.. .. Russell and II. +. Jones, peti
jurors, were discharged for the term.
In the case of Gottstein, Langert
Co. VS.. Il. Schilling, defendant hayin
admitted all the allegations In the com
plaint, Judgment was entered IN fayo
of the plaintiff in the sum of 1916 ~.
Gilbert Smith, bailitf, was discharged
for the term.
In the case of Boyd il Poncin vs.. ia
o0bson IL Nelson, the exception of JOIN
M. Blanchard to ths report of the ref
cree was 0verruled.
In the case of Charles Louch VI. l.
Schilling, as defendant had admitted
all allegations In the complaint, al
order was issued granting Judgment IL
favor of the plaintiff in the sun of S3oi
Gs and costs,and ordering that sufficient
of the property attached in the cause
be sold and the proceeds of such sale bt
applied Ia payment Of the sum and
costs.
In the case of Ii. p. Gregory & Co. VS.
Clarke, Anderson d Co., the motion OF
defendants that the costs in the case
be retaxed was denied, the defendant
excepting TO the ruling.
In the case of l.. L.. Bowers vs.. l..
Schilling, judgment was entered in favor
of plaintiff in the sum Of $204 ~.
In the case of the g. IL 4. 5. X. IL. Co.,
VA. Joseph Surber, the demurrer of de-
fendant to the complaint was with
drawn, and defendant was allowed ten
days in which TO answer.
The case of Michael Day ct al. W..
james O'Loughlin, was, by consent, re-
ferred to A. 9. Bowman.
In the case of William Mills vs.
Murphy Il Stewart, defendants having
failed to answer to the complaint, judy
ment was entered in favor of plaintiff in
the SUN of xl6O1.43.
In the case of w. X. Impett vs.. +.
Hammond, the exceptions of plaintiff
10 the report Of the referee were over
ruled.
Ia the case of Plrmas Sutton vs. Il.
Allen and j. Bennett. the libel was dis
missed, sufficient grounds of damage
not having been proven; to which an
exception was filed by libellant.
In the case of August Melhorn Va.
James M. Coleman, defendant was al
lowed ten days in which to answer to
the complaint.
The case of 4. IL. Campbell va. Peter
Baaman, was by consent referred tn w.
ID. Wood, Esq, to take the testimony
therein.
The case of George Phillips vs..
Zacoheus Allen and J. Benuett was dis
missed. grounds of damage not having
been sufficiently propen. 10 this libel
liant excepted
In tha case Of Sarah Maurer OF al.
W. Renton Coal Co., the demurrer to
the case was overruled aud defendant
WAS allowed ten days III which to An
swer.
In the case of Henry M. Shaw, in
solvent, Va. his creditors, il was ordered
that all creditors of the said insolvent
appear befor the Court on the 1lth day
Of December, 1883, and there show why
the prayer of the said insoivent debtor
should not be granted, and An assign
inent of his estate made. In the mean
time all proceedings against the said
insolvent are ordered to be stayed.
In the case of Young a. McKeon vs.
Il. Levy X Co., the motion of defend
ant for new trial was overruled.
In the case of s. Baxter Il Co. va. II.
g. Thornton, plaintiffs motion for a
new trial was overruled; to which rul
ings plaintiffs excepted and by consent
we're allowed forty days in which TO
file their bill Of exceptions
The prison account Of the United
States Marshal, amounting to $724.69,
wasapproved.
In the Case of James s. Peecroft ys.
Charles II. Low, of the steamer Nellie,
new trial was granted.
DIR. r. b. Hendricks was tined $25
and costs for contempt Of Court for
coming ON the witness stand in an in
toxicated condition in the case of the
Territory vs.. II. b. Fox.
Court adjourned until $50 this morn
inv.