New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1883-03-27
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
A NUMBER OF DECISIONS AYYoUNcED-A NEW RULE
IN ADMIRALTY.
WASHINGTON, March 26.-In the Supreme

WASHINGTON, March 26.-ln the Supreme
Court of the United States to-day decisions were
as follows:
and II r. cRey appeal from the Circuit Court Of the United
% ds . n for further proceedings not
win ae pgnSp Of s s sSHFi ap DpnS
% s etc sPRsa ~ G indiana decree
frned with opinion by Jushce Matthews NO Sa
George Ewe oppe " 9se ag 6c 9Os se for Tie
District Of rexas decree modified and affirmed each party
pay T. own sot tn es s SSa pG
Howard PHELPS y error 10 If II New YORK ugmens al
frmed opinion by Chief Justice Waite ,s 80 o- ror,rs
Thomas Murphy Collector In error % the C iT T
Court Of the United states iSf So,s and
with directions to award new trial OPINION ny NHei Jus
ss Barton IT, assignee etc plaintiff ind IN n eT Tsp
nessee Decree affirmed with opinion by CHIEF Justoo
versus Isaac j. Lewis Appeal the Circuit Court o. ne
with costs opinion by Chief Justice waite. ,,,,,. ?,
6Sl-Benlamn Hilton appellant, az ag Tho p e Of
Columbia Dismissed for want OF Jurisdiction oDmon U"
No 2S5John Deyn appellant agt B. s. Hilton ana W.;
II Dickinson appeal o and ihs smea with costs 10
original eIpare In the matter OF william e. srus a.
BS S cEe Justice rsil WatS e. VIII Oh
q ss asHsa'qN No. 's MnFn b
the matter Of the Canada sogtaefnd On Tie sec
At the CONCLUSION or the reaulnBoi opihi""9 '"'
Justice announced the adoption OF the following rule;
Ii admir- Lty-No. 90 $780,. -, -. .-o.
In suit ~ damage by collision the claimant Of any YES
proceeded against any respondent proceeded
shall by petition on Oath presenter DIoe VI a.
time answering the libel within such uther is as e
Court may allow containing suitable alterations showing
fault negligence In any other vessel olnD9thg 10 me
same collision. particulars thefoO ana mat such
any other party ought to be prceehed ag
the suit for such damage. pray tAt p.o,hea,
be issued against such vessel or parry 10 mnt
served shall n such vessel or party h2u
been Originally against the other parties in the
snt shall petition claimant Of such Nesse OF
such new party answer the libel and such further pro
ceedngs shall and decree rendered by tho Court
the sut as and justice shall appertan But every sue
petitioner shall upon ling his petition. give shuAtio
with sufficient sureties pay the hbean ana 70 any
claimant or brought In b. virtue OF such process
an such costs damages expenses shall be awared
against the petitioner by Court upon tie final decree
in the original appellate court anu any
such claimant party sha give the same oOuus or
stpuatons which required IN like cases from parties
brought Issued the prayer OF ahelAht
Miscellaneous business was transacted "a follows;
No 2O2 the Baltimore and Potomac RalrOad Company
plaintiff error against the FIFTH BAPTIST church and ~
LOS the Mutual La Insurance Company; plain
Leopold luchs. Passed until MONDAY
next Il3 Louisville and Nashville Raroad Com
pany plaintiff error against Manuel Pamas collector ETC.
Motion to advance submitted NO. 1913. the Dislct oil
Columbia plaintiff against the Washington MAAet
COmpany-Argument begun