Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1883-04-04


appellants, June u.
Ann Barnum, as administrative of the
estate of William II. Barnum, deceased,
| respondent VS.. the Chicago, Milwaukee &
st. Paul Railway company, appellant, May
%.
Daniel Mackenzie, respondent VS.. the
city of Mortified, appellant, April 81.
| 1t the matter of the application of Web
| ster Smith and others for receiver of the
property of Ion T. A. Studdart, respon-
dents VS.. the New York Life Insurance
company, appellant, May %.
| Minneapolis Mill company, respondent,
VS.. Samuel H. Wheeler, George Hineline
and Willis G. Plank, partners etc., appel
lants, May II.
I The state of Minnesota, plaintiff and
respondent, vs.. the Minneapolis Millers'
| association, defendant and appellant, April
l16.
| Louis Z. Menage, respondent, vs.. August
Justified and Minnie S. Justified, appel
lants; molten of respondent to dismiss ap-
peal, April II.
Samuel Greenwood, appellant VS.. Theo-
dore Sheldon, Charles Belcter, A. Z. Clum
and Silas B. Foot, co-partners, etc., of firm
known as the Clum Compromising Com
pany, respondents, June Z.
In the matter of the application
of the Mississippi and Rum
River Boom Company, for the appoint
ment of commissioners, ETC., James Wea-
yer, appellant, VS.. the Mississippi and
Rum River Boom Company, respondent,
June 1.
| Nelson L. Dutton, appellant, VS.. j. A.
McReynolds, respondent, May Is.
John A. Russell, respondent, vs.. Frank
Chambers, appellant, May Is.
NJ. Leo and W. B. Bumlsha, co-partners
as M. Leo & Co., respondent, VS.. the St
Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway
Company, appellant, passed.
John D. Wilson, appellant, VS.. John
Sherfbillich, respondent, May %.
Daniel Evans, respondent, VS.. Winona
Lumber company, appellant, June s.
Ellen Crolley, respondent, IS. the Min.
neapolis d st. Louis Railway company
appellant, May 8.
o. A. Waiter, appellant, VS.. the Chicago
Milwaukee q st. Paul Railway company,
respondent, April 16.
Ellen Kingsley and Dwight L. Kingsley
respondents, VS.. Eli B. Ames, appellant
May 81.
Rebecca s. Thompson, respondent, VS.
Jason @. Easton, appellant. Passed
VIM. 81. Jones, respondent, VS.. Edward
Moran and Patrick j. Moran, partners as
Moran Bros, appellants. Passed. Judg
ment affirmed.
Julia F. Greeuleaf, respondent, VS.. Peter
f. Egan, appellant; no action.
Henry b. Sibley, respondent, VS.. Don L.
Willard, the Board of County Commission.
ers of Pike county and Levi II. McKusick
Edward Jackson and John w. Sellers,
trustees of School District No. 3 of Pike
county, 1.-THE Board of County Commission.
ers of Pike county, appellant, April 16.
Esaias Rheiner, respondent, VS.. the Still.
water Street Railway and Transfer Com
pany, appellant. Appellant moved to
continue and also moved to strike from
the calendar, April 8.
Nichols, Shepard & Co., appellant vs.
John F. Knowles, respondent; respondent
moved to continue under Rule u; contin.
ued.
Myron Shepard, appellant VS.. G. II. Pet
tit, ct al, respondents; respondent moves
to dismiss; ne bond given, April II.
Julia Kausal and William Kausal, appel.
lants VS.. Minnesota Farmers Mutual Fire
Insurance Association, respondent, May 10
Frank j. Mackey and Robert Il. Kelly
appellants VS.. Eli B. Ames, respondent
May 81.
Jonathan T. Abbott, appellant vs. the
Chicago, Milwaukee & st. Paul Railway
Co., respondent, May 25.
Peter Menurer and Phillip Baker, part
ners as Memurer & Baker, respondents VS..
William N. Carey, appellant, May %.
Henrietta A. Nichols, appellant, VS.. The
City of Minneapolis, respondent, May 80
The st. Paul Foundry and Manufacture
ing Company, respondent, VS.. John NJ.
Gushing, defendant, F. L. Putnam, gar
nishee, and John NJ. Cushing and Henry
W. Jameson, partners, etc., intervening
claimants, appellants, May 80.
| n. E. Coulstrom, respondent, VS.. the
Minneapolis and st. Louis Railway Com
| pany, appellant. Passed.
Frank ]. Mackey and Robert l.. Kelly,
appellants, VS.. Eli B. Ames, respondent,
| error.
| Eva Morse, administrative of the estate
of Henry L. Morse, respondent, VS.. The
Minneapolis & st. Louis Railway company,
appellant; error.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, Us.
Martin Braggeman ct al, appellants;
passed.
| The Johnston Harvester company, ap-
pellant, VS.. Gerge Clark respondent; to
! be submitted on briefs.
State of Minnesota VS.. L. Brin; May Il.
Probate Court.
| Before Judge McGrorty.I
| Estate of A. Eliza Wright, deceased; Pc