The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1883-08-01
Spicy uorrerpondenes.


While in the East recently @ vernon F,s
ter was interviewed thu EFFECT nat NJ
HOsdtv's nomination for Governor had cp-t
HIM $50 OC0, and on this subj CT quite CORE
spOI del &C has since been carried on as fol-
lows:
Mr. H0ADLY 70 GOVERNOR POSTER.
eIScIsSAII July 23,lsSS.
Hen. charles Foster Columbus. o:
Isit tue. ss stated in yesterdays Cincinnati
psTtrs. that you said thai n mttted that 0lnght
III eDina'ion al the democratic party. etc I
Isunce IL g. false IN whole In part. II is not
Tie fact. and no Auch Admission vas ever made.
Ans~er GEORGE HnDALY.
ANOTHER LITTER TO TBE GOVERNOR.
CINCINNATI July q, 1888.
Hop. Charles Fcstor Columbus. o
SIR rent yen this mt rni'g telegram. to
which exec a reply rp II your re urn 70 CDlnn-
brs. y ear while ] enclose sou. from the Com
rercisl Gazette of yesterday, copy of the inter
sns have msIks d the passage an Oh is OF special
jntG rest 10 myself do ret assume, until hear
from yen, that tois interview fairly represents
Won only say to on that tire whole ststement
is a fable from beginring 10 end. aud AN
ent.u 10 know FRI whom it ems-
mated ard upon what authority Il is
and have no right to complain of them. no ma :
ter how extensively tbcF may be expressed. bat
The entire statement embraced within pencil
mark IL wicked fslsehood rs was ever state
in print, the only tru'h IN IL Being hat your
fTitD0 Alexander 4. Sanoa Is asa my lrieuu. anI
ira, David X. Psise IVES warm suppor,et of my
n, Il alton for GoyerneF aud was undoubtedly
efficient in pros ming me the nomination. as his
influence with tho sc Who know hin l. most de
stlvecIy great. AVA ting your reply by telegraph
GEORGE HoADLY.
GOVERNOR FOSTERS REPLY.
COLUMBUS. o., July y. 1SS3
Hon. George Hosdly, Cincinnati:
returned today ard have just read your dis
pstch of this date If the interviewer had male
me lay that lit is alleged that Judge Hoadly has
admitted - etc. etc would have been CORE tlJ
reported far as the paragraph 70 which you etel
T. col cErncd. A gentleman who says he b vi 8
fun talk upon the subject with You told me whs
you said TO him. that your nomination cost you
$500 and that Mclean compelled you to PAY
one-balf Of This sum during the Convention
can not give his name without his consent. Now
that the subject IL up permit 20 add that IL i
notorious that the delegation from Cincinnat
10 the Democratic Convention openly solo
their votes. to candidates, and the oric
stood. Would IL not be well for you % state pub
Hcly hat II cost you 10 get your nomination, and
whether ii is true that Mclean MADE you pay mon
1 tPsD you would have paid lad he kept out OF th'
f;Pht. IL so, bSw much. so that tnis point ri
/ B'iye TO the cost OF your nomination may be deh
I niely III derstood? The "old democracy" / az
/ onite sure. would like to tie informed. sugges
this because your vigorous epithets seem TO apply
To The smount stated and not To the fact that y1l
| did not pay anything. CHAHLES FOSTER.
| IfoADLS REPEATS HIS CONTRADICTION.
CINCINNATI July o. 1888.
/ hon. Charles Foster. CoIumhas. U:
repeat the state inert IL false IN all all its parts
Now, produce your Informant ard let me crnfrna
Rim. GEORGE HoADLN.