The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1883-02-11
TALE OF THE TELECRA PEI
Csntlnuea irom d., rnge.

Lynch asked consent 10 put on it, passage
The bills placing the heirs OF cniored soldiers
on the same iootiug. as TO bounty, as the
heirs of white soldiers.
Sparks objected.
the tariii oil Sas then taken NJ
Dunnsli moved TO reduce tire duty on cut
nalls ana spikes nom Il 10 / cent per
pound.
Ia the course OF the discussion Kelley
read from sn English paper description
OF The terrible condition vi labor IN Eng
land, and Townsend, OF Illinois, quoted
nom the testimony If Foster before the
senate committee on education and labor
TO show that the condition Of many labor.
ers M New England was equally terrible
Anderson failed to see What connection
there was between the touching incidents
the gentleman from Pegnsy lyania Kelley
had reid about, aud this question of the
duty ON cut nails. but il had suggested To
him another picture; that Of man who.
either by inheritance or otherwise, had nc,
cumulated large wealth, who possessed
magnificent residence in the suburbs Of
thiladelphia, who had every luxury life
could desire, whose check on the bank was
good Tor millions, simply because he was ia
with few of the iron monopolists. Con.
trast that picture of the monopolist, who
elected congressman aud senators, who cor,
uolled tarlil commissions, who had power
greater than any other power in the United
states, with the condition OF the laborer,
lie supposed that Tor the purpose OF pre-.
serving symmetry and harmony, the duty
on nails would be kept up, but he warned
ms republican colleagues they would hear
uom the republican voters of the west who
were large consumers OF this article They
wouln ana Il verdict OF wanting "and don't
you forget it, As far as he was concerned
ne would not permits any man to use the
republican party as ats.paw 10 rake
ouesthuls out Of the mOn0polists' fire.
kufsell denied the statement of Foster. rs
quoted by ToWnshend, as to the caudition
Of laborers IN New England. aud Bayno, OF
fennsy lvania, asserted that he lah0rers OF
Pennsylvania were urging high tariff for
The protection OF labor, asking no such an.
peals as thls man Foster, whO, Ia all Iroba-
bii,ty, was a crank of some description.
DunnelPs motion was lOst-7l tosi
uh MOTION OF Carlisle, the duty on rail-
way iish plates was reduced from u to II
cents per pound
Dingley offered au amendment, which
was adopted, imposing q duty Of . cents
per pound on anchors or parts thereof.
mlll IRON ana millcranks OF wrought iron.
wrought iron and torgnFs of iron and steel
Tor vessel Z, stoam engiuea and locomotives
or paris lrereoi, weighing each twenty-five
pounds or more
Dunnell moved to reduce the duty on
horse shoe nails, Chab nails and wire nails
from to cents per pound.
Hewitt, ct Alabama, opposed the motion,
aud had read u memorial from the from
manufacturers in Alabama, protesting
against tue reduction ofduly on iron ore.
lio was nrragued by Mills for abandon.
ing the principles OF the democratic party,
ana replied by attributing to the insertion
OF the word only" in the tariff plank oil
the party, It's defeat in the presidential
election. The controversy was greatly en-.
joyed by The representatives.
Dnnncl's motion was lost-67 to 81.
The committee then rose and the house
adjourned.
The democrats Immediately went into
caucus