The Corvallis gazette. [volume] (Corvallis, Or.) 1862-1899, 1883-04-06
Circuit Court Proceedings Of March Tszt1
for Benton County. Oregon

/
jury brought in verdict os '.Not guilty" /"
Paulina Wood vs. Jesse Wood ct al. H..
w. keesee appointed guardian ad Item Of
defendants, J D. Wood and Elizxbetls
| Wood to represent their interests In this
suit ::
| w. W. Yantis Administrator Of tho 81
tate Of JAS. A. Yautis VS. s. 81. Oliver after
! trial by jury they rendered verdict in favor
of plaintiff for $500 upon which the court
afterward gave Judgment for thst anounS
and COSTS
At this time John Kalsay presented the
| resolutions adopted by ths bar on the death
of I. n. Smith which resolutions ara found
in anosher column.
State OF Oregon va Thomas Kynaston hs-
dieted for the crime Of assault with iassua
+, to commit rape, under the direction of the
court the jury brought 10 q verdict Of "Nss
gaiity.''
District Attorney moved the court foE
| leave to submit the last named case to the
grand jury again which motion was after4
| wards by the court overuled.,
Willalnesse valley and Coast Railroa6
Company VS. NJ. L. Trapp, motion of plain-
| tiTs council for continuance overru1ed by
| the court
Fl. P. harris rs Oregon Pacific Railroad
Company, motion of defendants for contin>
| uance which was granted BY the court upon
| the defendant paying forty dollars.
| Adaline Moore VS. Stokely Moore dis
missed on motion of plaintiffs attorney.
| Stoke!y Moore VS. Adaline Moore de-
fendant withdrew her defence and George
Brock sppointed Referee to take testimony
and report his findings of law and facts to
the court.
State of Oregon VS. 2. P. Jones indicted
for the crime of larceny by altering marks
and brands on an animal arraigned and
took his day to plead who afterwards plead
not guilty.
| The State of Oregon vs. Frank valardA
indicted for the crime of assault with intent
! to kill arraigned and took his day to plead
who afterwards plead not guilty.
Charles Dubruiile vs Sol King dismissed ~
plaintiffs cost On his motion.
H. Dubrui1le VS. Sol King dismissed At
plaintiffs cost.
Fl. A. Drubruille and Charles Dubruills
VS. Sol King and Max Friendly dismissed 1T
plaintiffs cost.
| Adolph Taisel vs. Robert Sweabolt on mo-
ticn F. M. johnson WAS appointed Referees
to take testimony and facts, and time to-
take the same extended to lst day of next
term.
Ellen Humphrey vs. Albert Humphrey
Referees report received divorce granted In
favor of plaintiff custody of minor children
granted to plaintiff and $1,000 AllinoHy
denreed against defendant.
Stokely Moore vs Alkaline Moore divorce
tgranted to plaintiff and custody of minor
children given to him.
c.. J. Bishop vs. oeeeoss Pacific Railroad
Company. Trial by jury and plaintiff nom
suited by the court. "A.
James G. Cherry Administrator vs AIlen
Parker judgment against defendant for
s747 81 and $50 attorneys fees.
State Of Oregon VS. Ralph Wrenn in~
dicted for Obtaining money undar false pre-
lenses, srraigned and took his day to plead.
| Maria Armington VS. Sof King ordered
continued.
| Rachael Smith VS. W. P. Smith and N.
P. Avery dismissed ct plaintiffs cost.
| Mary Ellen Wiley VS. VIM. Proudtoot
ct al continued.
". A. Mccullough vs. Oregon Pacific
Railroad Co., continued.
| State of Oregon VS. Lsbaa Sanders. de-
fendant sentenced to the penitentiary for
one year and to pay the costs of the prose-
cution in this case.
Board of Commissioners for ths sale Of
School and University lands vs. B. W.
| Wilson and others, decres Of foreclosure Of
mortgage and sale of nortgaged property to
satisfy the sum of 1887 "a and the sum Of
s542 so.
| Charles Hodges VS. Wm. Hodges eon-a
tinued.
Willamette valley and Coast Railrosf
Company vs. IL L. Trspp, on plaintiffs mos
tion dismissed.
John Burnett & John Kelsay W ThoA
?. Espy judgment for STA 81 against de-
| fendant.
John Layton VS. T. E. Parker judgments
against defendant for 800 es and costs.
4. J. Langworshy assignment for benefit
Of creditors continued.
Knapp Burreu & Co. VS. VIM. Bsgley and
others, Judgment in favor of plaintiff and
iagainst defendant, Wm. Bagley, fos $S4S
and SCI attorneys fees and decree OF sale Of
mortgaged real and personal property, and
decree in favor of defendants. Woodcock =
Baldwin, and against defendants Bsgley
Marlett & Burns for the sum of s243 25 and
S25 attorneys fees and order to sell mort.
gagged real and personal property, and de-
cree in favor of defendants Belknap Brothers
& Kennedy and against defendant VIM.
Bagley for S30l and sale of mortgaged real
and personal property and decree in favor
of A. Cauthorn & Son against Bagley, Mar
lett & Burns for the sam of S232 and sale Of
rnortgaged property, and decree in fsvor Of
f. Born for the snm of 1907 and $50 attor<
ineys fees against defendants Bagley, Marlett
and Burns and sale of mortgage1 property.
F. B. Dunn VS. w. H. Huffman and Mary
E. Huffman continued.
State of Oregon VS. Thos. Kyniston upoH
two indictments for assault upon two girls
arraigned and took his day to plead to eachs