Daily Los Angeles herald. [microfilm reel] (Los Angeles [Calif.]) 1876-1884, 1883-06-29

The Samples Exhibited Their
Quality and Character The
Sentiment of the People = A
Conservative Policy Preferred

Conservative Policy Preferred.
Owing to the crowded state OF our
columns in last Sundays issue, it was inn
possible to publish list Of the various
kinds of wine and brandy that were
examined by the viticultural Commits
sioners and other invited experts and
wine growers. The list comprises the
following:
From L. j. Rose Of San Gabriel:
Blaue Elben of 1880; Berger of 1880;
zinfandel of 1881; Trousseau port Of
1882; Zinfandel port OF 1882; brandy of
1877; brandy of 1879.
j. DeBarth Shorb OF San Marine:
Zinfandel claret of 1882; Mission claret
Of 1882; Mission port of 1882; Mission
port Of 1881; Mission port Of 1878;
Mission port Of 1870; Angelica (Mission)
Of 1882; Angelica (Mission) of 1873;
Mission white OF 1882; Mission white of
1873; Mission brandy Of 1882.
Hellman 4 Downey .of Cucamonga:
Blaue Elben, white wine, 1882; Blaue
Elben, claret, 1882; Mission white, 1882;
Mission port, 1882.
H. Verde. Anaheim; White Mission.
Maud Weyse 4 Co., Los Angeles:
Sherry (Mission), 1882; Angelica Mus.
cat), 1882; Port (Mission) 1882; Angel
lea tMission), 1882; Mission white, 1881.
Kohler q Frohling. Los Angeles: Port,
Mission, sherry, Mission; Muscat, An
gelica. mixed; brandy, Mission.
F. Hartung, Anaheim: Berger, 1882;
Angelica, Mission, 1872.
C. Krug, st. Helena: Riesling, 1877:
Gutedel, 1876; Zlinfandel, claret, 1880;
Franklin Riesling, 1882, Gutedel, 1882;
Orleans, Riesling, 1882; Zinfandel. 1882.
George West, Stockton: Burgundy,
1881; Vests Prolific: 1881; port, Trous-
seau, 1881; Mission brandy, 1877; Vests
Prolific brandy, 1881.
H. w. Crabb, Napa county: Pied de
Perdrix, red wine, 1882; Black Bur-
gundy, red wine, 1888; Gamay Tein-
turein. red wine, 1882; MaIbec, red
wine. 1882; Lenoir. red wine, 1882;
Grosser Blauer, red wine, 1882. From
h. A. Pellet, of st. Helena.) Charlton,
red wine, 1882; port. 1882; seedless
Sultana. white wine. 1882; Savignon
Vert, white wine, 1882; Pedro Ximenes,
white wine, 1882; Cadillac. white wine,
1882; Angelica, white wine, 1881.
/. De Turk, Santa Rosa: Brandy, Te-
hersagos, 1882; claret, Zinfandel, 1881;
Golden Chasselas, 1882; Golden Chase.
las, 1878.
J. Shaw, Sonoma county: Berger,
1879. Riesling, 1878; Grey Riesling,
1878; Zinfandel, claret, 1880; Zinfandel,
claret, 1879.
1t will be observed that the list is very
large, but unfortunately four-fifths of
the samples from this part of the State
were young wines, and but partially
matured, showing the fact previously
announced in the HERALD, that there
was no stock of marketable wines in
this part Of the country, except what
jobbers were holding for their daily
trade.
Mr.. Rose showed some Blaue Elben
and Berger Of 1880, that were very fine,
as was his brandy Of 1877 and 1879.
His other exhibit Was Of younger wines,
not yet attained to ripeness.
The exhibit OF Mr.. Shorb of the Mis-
sion White of 70, Angelica Mission of
'73, and Mission port of 1870 and 10,
were very fine, and pronounced of su-
perior quality. The rest of his samples
were young wines and brandies.
Messrs. Hellman & Downey exhibited
a very rare white wine, supposed to be
ct least seven years old, that was great
ly admired. IT was surprise to many
that such wine could be made from the
Mission grape. M II. Norde. of An
aheim, exhibiteda a good white wine,
also from the Mission.
Maud, Weyss & Co. had one sample
Of apparently ripe wine, white Mission
of 1881. All their other samples were
young wines.
Messrs. Kohier & Frohling exhibited
fine assortment Of good wines, includ-
ing some rich specimens of Mission, port
and sherry, muscat. angelica and brandy
from Mission.
Fred hartung' OF Anaheim, showed
some old Angelica Mission Of 1877 that
was very good. His Berger of 's2 was
too young to be appreciated.
chsries hrug, oil St. Helena, exhibited
some excellent Riesling of 1877, Gutedel
ci 10 ana ciaret OF iooo tnat was most
excellent
george west, OF stockton, exhibited
some Burgundy OF 1881 that showed
merit. lie also exhibited Mission brandy
OF ~ ana wines and prandies OF III not
yet mature.
II. W. Crabb' OF Napa, had a large
display oil wines OF 1857, which could
not be decided upon on their merits be-
cause their character and quality could
not be known Tor year to come.
Isaac DE Turk, OF Santa Rosa, had
some superior Golden Chasseias OF 1878,
and display of young wines of 1882 not
yet mature.
MIR. J. Shaw had q very meritsrious
display OF Berger OF 1878, kiesling OF
10, Grey kiesling OF ~, linfandei Of
" and ". This exhibit showed great
merit and was much admired.
Inc result showed that age was a
requisite Tor wines and that the
marketing OF unripe wines was q source
OF injury to all engaged In the trade. 1t