The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1883-10-11

and precincts have been received up to
11:30 p. M, which give net republican
gain OF I'LL. The republicans claim large
gains in Cincinnati.
AT midnight the result on the state ticket
and legislature is in great doubt. Chair
man Barger, of the democratic com;
be about 600 on the state ticket, and that
they will carry the legislature. The re-
publican committee expects to elect the
BBDHernSG BBut Comedies that it sG depends ON the
result in Cincinnati and Cleveland. The re-
turns are so meager that neither committee
is over-confident. The impression prevails
that the second amendment VIII
ther committee seemingly cares. For the
legislature Governor. Foster conceded.the rt :
snlt depends on Cincinnati and Cleveland, h,
and says that he calculates the strong local.
tiles have been reversed on both sides.
DAYTON, Oct. 9.-At this hour 1t is safe
to say the entire democrat.
ic county ticket is elected. There are
slight republican gains all, round and q
heavy vote so far for the second amendment.
TYLER.
TYLER, Oct. Special. .]-Supreme
court certificates, dismissed: Everett ct
Al VS.. Hendricks, fEom Harrison county.
Submitted: Jones ct al VS., Ford, from
Harrison county; Heath Adher VS..
LAME ct al, from Harrison county; Inter
national & Great Northern railway VS.
Copeland ct al, from Wood county.
Referred to commissioner OF appeals
Norton ct al VS.. Reeks, from Dallas county;
Lasater ct al VS. Bentley, ct al, from Dal-
las county; W5.elock Us, Painter, IRON
Dallas county; Wallace rs. city OF Dallas
from Dallss county; kneply VS.. Bolts *
o., from Dallas county; Druni ct al vs.
Elliott ct al, from Dallas county; Ball,
Hutchins g. Co. VS.. Warren, from McClel-
ian county; Evitts ct al vs., Roth ct al,
from Wise county; Floyd VS.. Terrell
ct al, from Wise county
Dickinson VS.. Dsvereaux ct NJ,
from Wise county; Vaden vs.: MoreheaN,
ct al, from Grayson county kiean Oo.,
Grsyson county; Texas d Pacific railway
VS.. Fitch, from Grsyson county Thomas q
seers vs.. Frozier Hewes. from Grtyson
county: Davis ct al, vs.. Nswcome et al,
from Grsyson county; Snow et al. vs.. Tay-
lor, from Hamilton county; Scott vs.. Dyer
ct all, from Lamar county; Cook ct a. VS..
Dennis ct al, from Lamar county, Bran
Iette ct al, vs.. Jones, from Lamar county;
Cochran vs.. Msrmaduke ct al, from Lamar
COUNTY; Bray ct al, vs.. Aiken, from Lamar
county: McJrsry ct al. va. Torpey, from
Tarrant county; Holden vs. McLaury, from
Tarrapt COUNT; Griffin vs. Ford ct al, from
Tarrant county; Neall ct al. vs. Steele from
Tarrant county; WyDDe ". Morrill,. from
Fanuin county; Simpson ct al; W. Brother
ton, from Fsnnln o0qpnty; py hempnnu county: ~:
Rassie ct al, vs.. Jones. from
r.feP P,tssr GOS COUNTY; sn.ed vs.. Br.mIstis,
from FrIo county; wilhelm et al vs. RoseD-
bower, from shsckleferd county; Wilhelm
Va. Connor ct al, from Shsckleiord countyi
Msher W. Roenile, from Collin cosn,yi
tsrs Va. lawson et al, from Hood county;
geyser W. nenssbsck, ct Al, from Mason
county; Rush vs. Dlsuoy IRON hArils
county: Lack VI. Rilsy. from Mheelsr
couutr. Groesbeck vs. Ersth and Wallnce
". Jeris from Wilson county: Adams ef 81.
". Hayden. ct al, from wilson county
Eder ". Hamilton from 1r.F.s county
Psl. Pinto couEfy: Hole ". BAEer and
Rice, from Zee county; Porter "a D0ngn-
ertv. from Michel couDty.
fiourf Of sppesls sftrmed. 6haw ~.
a.ste from Nscoedocbes county Albullon
Va rfrfs iron San Au-ustiDe county
Appesls dismissed. .B1cher "a stst ron
F-rfh cruufg.
eornIt.ed on Bries Tor bcfh parties
e cood.rf u. sars from Van L.ndt equity (.
adfis1n "a srs'e from Nos1 cguniT-
o. b-i-,< for st.is- Thompson va state
49, Vrr Zrrff county. EiTDn "a stlts
f-orr Upsbur EourtIs clo1e "a H.,s -
w. Zrrdf county. Wiser " ststs f-s-r
T1r-tur cuunry. Ars-s a LirnssT " rs,<
f-1-r Ven Z.-6t c1urfF-
% N1rion 20 d. mis- Des1 n HHts
r-rr Tr<b1r cgunty-
o. tr,s1s and oral nrrrDert - 80
rs~firr- O'En-l II rtsts = r k-tr1 co11-
n. rr-rIa1T ~ Etnt. Fl r. HE1 co.r
/ C-uIrtsr 81. ~ Crrnts = ~ -
GrsgE courtJ-