Walker Lake bulletin. (Hawthorne, Nev.) 1883-1926, 1883-11-21
- Esnneralda Returns in Person.

thiak, for such man rs Judge Wells
To assume such latitude, For the
past month the paper that Judge Wells
has SO often patronizingly spoken of
rs "our paper under editorials and
irresponsible initials, has hurled its
scurrilous and nasty abuse at one who
simply dared exercise the freedom of
an American citizen and sit within
the hearing of the doings of the Board
of County Commissioners aud the
sound of the hammer at work upon the
Court. house. And now, when such
filthy abuse had been lavishly used,
without any other than II damaging
effect to the contemplate representa-.
tives of the Herdld Qor who can say
how many compose the editorial staff
of that paper, or who owns lD, Judge
Wells, over his own name, name that
he well knows it has been my task on
more than one occasion to defend
"when none were found so poor as to
do it reverence" thus rates me for
not assuming responsible cognomen.
| What occasion was therep No such
person had made himself then known
on their side, and even now he makes
il known by way OF attempted eNplana.
t,oh TO lhe puplc Tor solhethlhS thal
the county commissioners came near
aoihg III opposiliou 10 ms W'sheS' as
ne says, allhough 'ne very document
was introduced oy nm, ana no lht''
ma,loh OF ms alsappr0Val iheh made
But now let us follow briefly his
explanation and see whether it is con.
sislene OF not flrst, lhen' ne aohilts
lne alelatioh Oh snch contract, put
ulsclaiins any otlier reason LOT SO uolng
IMAM Il longing 10 serve inc pueiio
Sooo' aho so' u,a"e sucn co.s'"e'
as ~ ne ooes no' iu',y approve o. NOW,
ana noI Eshieraiua Ooenty tneh nave
real Depul{ blstrlct AtVerhe( Nhot
t'le'l de.lhS Depu'y pu. ohe uuly up,
i pj,n, ~ no Ri aF Cor,n,;."ion "n'
,ra, - dis;ntarostod .,,ornoy ,hon In
a. -, ~ NJ nahnani, ,n 10 ~
,a,.,, ,,,pr,, !, ,,as liz J,,,,, ,n no,for,,, y
W. h, ;n :. w, W. va ,ont ad
49,, :" as ,,,;n. a,,",r;so;o,,o Snrsl,, ,,,,
NV NV - "" !, , '"1Jj 80 nnnfn1 ,,a,
~, a,s,i,a,,, ;,s,,aro, ,bnin I,,i,,
, ,a;29,oa i,o.Sa1 ~. ,n1 aa,;oi,aa ~
lra.,,;,,.s,, :, . III, Il, 10 H..
ME - =, 49, ,,,s,,,;o,, tho, nn,l,
h,,Ion,,aa 70 tha, n,,,,,o y
It. a.. -, H., q, ocr,, To;,
,,,,S,, ~ 80 ,l,, ,,,oI oon,sn,,,
III ,,o, ;,,;nro ,I,,, onn,,, Laa,n'a
49, Ia - Wv Ii,,I ~ :,
, ,ne ,haa n NV Na, "o "a a., poT as,,
hau. ~ ,1,a o, ri ~ ~" Ia
,,, =, H., ..,,a,'as9sr,lI,, ;,,ro,saa F.
w., IL W Is; ~ ~ 80 ~,
oa1 80 o,a h,,,,' ti,n, a,a ~
,,,,,a,,, ~ ,,aaa1' ,,o;ns ,aoa -,
ppr;,r ,,nS w.. p,';oi,ntaaS W. tbis H.
~ '!s- ,',,' - ia, ,a ',
o ,sa'''I ~, -, ~. 80 :,
Ny ~ NV So y, ,t w
If 20 ,l,o oi,iaane shouid nnr .'aj faaj
rratnf nj '''''''''' ~ O'''>' V '''''' 49,
So
NO one, imagine, couId Dlane MI
bancock lor maklnS inc pest 'faae ne
! possibly colld Win inc boaru' ana SO
iar as l. KNOW, no one uoes; nor lilueed'
Wouda IL DC strange ii ne Snould ehi-
ploy au attoiHey 10 atcehu ~ MS ousl-
ness. bsl lliat INC ie9sI ADVISER OF inc
! Doara shoGfu nc coiifchiei'4S out OF
the way an" tat MS duties shouid u;
imposed upon some enc else ana tlaa
look, 10 say me leaSt' inconsistent.
Especially SO since we Know 'here was
"a second suo'coh!ract' very similar IN
Terms 10 0he lrst one, subsequently
presented TO the board whlch was
also refused because IL only PROVIDED
lof the return ol 'ne proceeds, il any
lhere WERE III excess oi What was lheh
aue tne contractor was tDlS hG9es-
sary wien inc pohus amounted 10
soAooo ana tue cohFact was ZOE
ohiS SH9'loo' uaiesS thcy anticipated
ueheieney seiaeWhefe' W us tpe Act
% eie kggas4a'''rc "l<o 10 '"he care ol
liiis hiusI lhere noI nave oeeh Sou
uee ehe county unless ihey ahUcHueo
10 use IL upon extra WORK. OF, perhaps,
tha1 si9niic an, Ii''le ttiii iach VI
proceeas' WI nat coui% thitt clausc
proVidlhg uiat Payments thereafter
snouid &c mate accor"lilS 10 llio ~, tctihs
vi 'he oif9lhai contract ,iie"hF lhIiS
,lousahd uoiia's "ouiu Su'ciy pay
4@5' 100 anu lc"Ne balance III the
county laVor' Les' we cohcluuc this
Necessity WAS 10 dl1SC On dECOuul u