New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1883-03-09
THE COURTS.
ups HENRIETTA wYLIEs HABITS.
MRS. HENhIE IN !" TIT
WITNESSES HEARD IN THE SUIT 10 HAVE NE"

-, ar,nNard was continued before Justice Dyk-
va eriay at White Plains The petitioners in the
case are William Ii. Harbeck and Charles d. Haroecx'
her brothers; Sarah NJ Acker Adelaide r. Har-
r,s her haifssters and her only daughter, Mrs. Hen
rietta Gunther daughter-in-law OF exMayor Guuther
According the statements made by Messrs Rchards
and Brown who appeared counsel for the petitioners
Mira wyie has from $1,000 10 $4,000 in her own rignt
besides the income derived from about $4,000 more.
Her counsel places her income at mucn larger
amount Yesterday number OF witnesses
were examined In behalf OF the deienuah''
Samuel A. Churchill, prior to January l. 1885, kept
store at No 1893 Broadway, where Mrs Wylie useo 10
trade when she lived in sxty.fourh-st She generaiy
came to the store selected what she wanted TOT ne
self He saw her three or four weeks before the ria
He called upon her at wiiamsbridge when she hao
hurt one of with piece of glass The Witness
had seen Mrs. wyle drink. She usually TOOK d h''o
brandy; be had seen her drink ager-oeer however
Margaret Hermann gave her testimony as rolows'
have been in the employ of Mrs. wylle about three
months as cook in her establishment IN Westminster
have often seen greatly excited but she managed
her household affairs herself she gave me orders per-
sonaly as TO the meals. have seen her drink ittle
very little she is easily excited recoect when she
went away from home. She wanted to get away from
the excitement and annoyances which prevailed at the
house, caused by the servants who wanted their pay
never knew to send any servant out for liquor
Mark Skennion said that he had seen Mrs. Wyle under
tneinuence OF liquor three four times In the course OF
two years Mrs wye had employed him TO investigate
the loss of her property He had stayed at her
house over night perhaps thirty times George Leon
erd of westchester, had .seen Mrs Wylie about loo
times but only once intoxicated Oscar Hyatt attached
TO Van Ampurgh's circus had Mrs wye about five
times in the course Of two year, he aa S see9 ger
OF Wesc6ester, testified he had had sister in the
smpoy Of Mrs Wyhei or at h Mr, %yie would
come I'm her carriage place and ask be had any
communication to send to his sister IN s9e
her in the carriage; she would drink ABOUT 'ca-
Judge Dykman-That is hardly westchester drink
Leddy never saw Mrs wyle when she did not know
peared 10 him to under the influence of liquor she
talked intelugently, but acted little more jolly %9en
she was under influence Of liquor He had SOLO ner
brandy occasion. Hermann sehooer, OF 10
ITe ar 1s 9sa f' s saa
within week or two he mad seen heF d Ds
come and order what goods she thought she n.
and then sne .U wSaS ask ee hs wanted
The witness sold her brandy at different times IN
Humber Of bills were shown to the witness and he ac
hnowedged that they s % wT 6d
purchased on the averag about bottle OF brandy day.
Soe II Cmp. of Wiiamsbrdge testified that
he mad been treating Mrs wye for nervous pr3sirat3a
was malaria The assse0 %Ss
ana Mr. Richards for the petitioners 1t was then sub
mitted to The jury did not agree upon Nei
diet and was locked up tor the night
EDWARD SCHNELLS WIFE AND UNCLE.
TESTIMONY IN THE SUIT FOR $4,000 IN THE
BROOKLYN COURT
In the suit CT Edward Schnell to recover
$4,000 from his maternal uncle, Frederic BlOhm as
damages for the alienation Of his wifes love and afee
ton the testimony prosecution closed yesterday
In the Supreme Court BROOKLYN before Judge Cullen
The trial many spectators of whom MIS- sehneh
was one of the most interested The first witness was
anu Ell Price, bootblack and private messenger IN the
Twentyninth Precinct Police Station in this CITY, lie
bop ha in
following the elderly Mr.. Blohm and his
youthful niece by marriage IN Their wanoerns III In
Mrs schnel they aud kissed her lips
Mrs sehnePs twlnkled as sne tened p 20 ee ss
cred u, the witness. Price narrated how they sought Sc
aded E Sd aa' On sss2 the
while secreted in the bushes behind bench IN tne ra
other The said that her husband was gong to ss
cure divorce re Sa 3d. se Ser 10 make
Edward Brandt testified TO hesphs snS Intended 10
leave him. aud secure divorce ,enay ,s,ised that
smoye in the ne. pn Tea IN SeaSe s%d happiness when
he boarded them before they went 70 Setnay
before George weneger butcher wao supplied ,Sai
Schnes family with meat from loI2 TO leI9 sau INA,
he saw Mr.. and Mrs. sonneu nearly every cay III lhaI
tine and deDeaDor was always snectonsv Ses
other witnesses TESTIFIED IN efs a I 70 51e TsT sgo
Mss FANNY Eiser told Mrs. schneu showed her SIX
Tor ner aud she said husband was good to me-
The prosecution was closed wltn tI4 Ieaunk VI ' o
latter. wriften by Bom Mrs. Scbnel, ana f0und Dy
,ese, wa nd unGsr her pillow Especial attention was
called marks Of cross IN ring 10 oeno'e Sso'
ELECTED FROM THE FIFTH AVENUE HOTEL.
The suit of Mathew +. Neville against Hiram
Hitchcock and Alfred Darling, the propretors OF tue
Fifth Avenue Hotel $4,000 as damages ior
an eyed assault called for trial yesterday III 'no
Court Of Common Pleas, but was adjourned untI MOL
aS Oh the application of the plaintiff one OF whose
material witnesses said to be absent MI Ne'he III
his complaint alleges that Juno l. 1881 The deienu-
ants directed servants TO eject him from the no'e,
they did although he was 10 DC 'nere auu
had nothing justify the treatment wmca ne haa
received The defendants assert that MT NeVllle was
mt quest Of the hotel and put out because he waa
conducting himself in disordery way lie
cane to the hotel with two ladies and went In through
charge toid him that II against tue rules TO admit
ladies' by entrance He went TO the room OF person
alter a time sent waiter for wine. The waiter got
the wine the and was going up stars win y when
was toll liquor could be sent 10 the room nc
Sey sseGy aa in such that
the defendants were Obliged 10 nave MN put ou' u ''
hotel In justice TO their other guests.
A POINT IN FAVOR OF Mr.. HUTCHINSON
William j. Hutchinson short time ago OBJ
tanod an order foe examination OF the defendant a.
awtness before trial in his suit the Supreme Court
against Frederick Lawrence president OF the New
York Stock Exchange The defendant appealed from
the order to the General Term which yesterday rendered
q decision upholding the order The opinion OF lh'
Court was written by Justice Daniels Thep alnuh IL ID
said IA entitled examine Mr. Lawrence Tor tne pur
of learning facts which Will enable him to frame hi
so,o,o,u, Mr. Hutchinson asserts that lie was ex
eled from the stock Exchange without having had an
opportunity To defend himself His opject IN examining
Mr. Lawrence Is 20 what was done al the meeting
ofte Governing Committee at the session whe us OK
pusion was voted. Justice Daniels says lnat "i
Hutchinson not sllowed 70 examne inc ne =,
before trial he would cropping In the darA ID draw