Daily Republican., 1883-01-01
THV MARKET QUESTION
PYCIAL sEHs ION OF GOWN.
xLON Last SATURDAY
BVEUIAG.

Mr.. Newell objected, as be thought tn
petition should be acted on at once
and moved that the vote, Whereby sec
tion I of the ordinance was passed
should BE- resonsidered.
Mr.. Bailey urged tbst his motioI
should be put, but Messrs. Qn'nn ant
Newell coutended that It was no
seconded. Mr.. Bailey was speaking OF
the matter when Mr.. Quinn called tn
previous question.
Bailey contended that the pre-
question conld not be called
----l,- he had the floor, and Mr.. Garret
[Noh nded him that he was set dow'
GCo,.Ie previous evening, while speaking
ON the same question. Mr.. Bailey saif
that he bad some rights which hs di'
not propose to surrender, and ASKED TO
the decision of the chair, on 1t being II
order 10 call the previous question
while q member had the floor, and wa
speaking.
The chair decided that the gentleman
was In order in calling for the previou
question, and that it made no differ
encs II a member was speaking. h'
would have 10 take his seat until 1t wa
ascer,ained II Council sustained th'
call,
els that the decision of the chair,
asked Mr.. Bailey.
Mr.. Moore replied that It was.
"Then | appeal from your decision,
Mr.. Bailey. The rules were thei
...d aud Mr.. Bailey did not press for
ote his appeal.
Mr. pinn was about to say some
thin yben Mr. Bailey raised the
rr.at y. order that the previous ques'
n had been called for. The chair do
eiIed the point well taken, and Mr..
Quinn took his seat.
The call for the previous question
was renewed, and several members
asked what the question was. The
chair said 1t was the "msin question y
This did not satisfy Mr.. Garrett, who
desired to know what 1t was, ~ he did
not want to vote, and not know what
he was voting for.
1t WAS then stated that the question
was on tho reconsideration OF tho vote
whereby section ] of the ordi nance was
passed on the previous evening. THIS
1 cmed to satisfy the memb bers, but just
m .he question was about to be put,
Mr.. Rlake called for the ayes and nays.
The hairman, ,howeye yer, ,puttte question
to. ivn voce vote and declared It lost.
!. Blake said that he had called for
ayes and nays, and A. the call had
been seconded he appealed from the
decision and called for the ayes and
nays on the appeal. ,
The question was then put, Shall
tbe chair bs suat aimed 2" and was mega =
tived by the following vote: Ayes
Messrs. bailey, beecher' Eastoain'
Gruhb, Mention, stevenson, smith' Ia''
Icy ana JOhhsoh~-9' Nays-MeSsrs.
Baugh, Blake, Denney. FILE, Garrett,
Miller, Mcksnna, Newell, Paynter,
Quinn and Stevensou-ll'
The motion to reconsider was then
taken up AMI lost ny the 1olioTihR vote:
Ayes-Messrs. baugh, blake, Denhey'
Garrett, MeDton, Miller, MckeLDa,
Newell, Quinn and Shawl Nayt-
Messrs. Bailey, Beecher, Eastburn,
File, Grubb, johnson, Moore Paynter'
Stevenson, Smith and Talley.
Mr.. Quinn said there were several
gentlemen present, residing on hing
street, who would have liked 10 speak
on the subject before the vote was
taken. Az this time Mr.. Talley raised
the point that the gentleman wa" ont
OF order, as there was nothing before
the house. The chair decided the point
well taken, and raped Mr.. Quinn
down. As be TOOK bis seat he re.
maa5u d, well give you ORDER, ana
liant whole thlhg.
Ipito r.s brought Mr.. johnson TO bis ieet,
a.iu he said be would Ike to know wto
the gentleman meant by we. ne was
always talking about what we wo'Sd
do and he would like to know who we
are.
Matters then quieici down for the
time being, and Mayor wales VINO was
present to urge that the market should
he kept below sixth street, on King,
took his departure without having han
an opportunity to speak.
On motion Of Mr.. Bailey, the 2nd sec.
tion OF the ordinance was taken up 1or
consideration. Or molten OF Mr.. Tai
Icy, DR.. Springer, who resides on King
street, above Seventh, WAS invited toi
give his views on the matter. The doc
tor said that he WAS very much annoy
cd by the wagons standing In front OF
his house, and he had come to Council
to see II the section which had been
passed could be 30 amended that the
market would be kept below Seventh |
street. He said that this was the wish
of almost all the residents above Sew
enth street, as from that street mp there
was nothing but private houses.
The 2nd section was then taken up,
nnd MIR. Eastburn offered an amend
mont to the section, which, as 1t was,
kes it unlawful for any person, cx-
"a ,H,rmer or trucker, to sell sIaugh-
erred cattle, hogs, sheep or calves,
which were raised or fed on the lands
owred or rented by them. y The
amend mont, provided that there should
be 10 doubt abou. the meat having
been raised by the party offering 1t for
sale, and increased tho fino for viola.
tiop from s. to So.
Mr.. Eastburn and Mr.. Garrett both
spoke in favor cf the adoption OF the
l,,.,,H .,I tl., ialfar 90 va in. |