New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1883-10-07

ON letter written as alleged, by the defendant to
the plainti on July H. OF An obscene character IL
refers TO Mr. Elders VIE 70 who ne Sor was "a terms
derogatory 90 her character. Mr. Ball ehteTSu
plea of rot guilty and was held IN $500 ball LOT
trial in the Court of special Sessions The required
surety was gwen
A YOUTHFUL HUSBAND CAUSES ANAlElf'
Mrs Amelia Bodner who said she was forty-three
wears old, went TO Police Headquarters yesterday
and declared that her husband, Marcus BodneT age
nineteen had been abducted and probably murdered
They came TO this country from GnebOw. Austria,
about three months ago. Mrs. bonner IoTIleIlS WIS
n widow. and owned cottage In her native Town;
BOGucr who Is q barber married her last year, anu
Inv that means raised himself from poverty 10
p0sition Of comparative afflnence. To prevent her
yontbfnl husband from being compelled TO perform
military duty, Mrs. BOdner sold her cottage LOT
$500 and took him to New-YUrk. She lifted up
barber-shOp for him at No. 10 Dlvlslon-st.; at
cost of $3.50 and he began business, intending TO
earn "A living and make a fortune. AS tney were
Gistrustfu of savings banks, BOdncr invested part
of his wife's remaining money in diamond pm anu
n gold watch and chain, winch he wore. lie also
carried $500 in his pocket AT D a. M on lhulsuIay
Pincus SpauieT cousin Of Bodner, went 70 the
barber-shOp and said that tailor named Klein,
lodging at No. II SuiOlk-st;, was III ana needed
cupping Like most German BARRIERS, Boomer knew
something OF the practice OF surgery, ana ne haSty
answered the summons. lie did not return HiIs'
Rodpcr searched IN vain for her husband and her
missing property. She told the police yesterday
that Klein had not been i'll and that Pincus Spsmer
day morning She thought her husband had beeh
deceived away from home for purposes OF rObOtT}l
and that he had been murdered she Gehianocu
the arrest of Klein and Spanler. The police dlu hOJ
agree with her. They thought that Boomer pro1a-
bly, had run away from his wife, ana thaJ us
relatives IN the city knew where he had gone. a.
No II Suiiolk-st IT was SAID that BOdner was there
on Thursday morning, and that he Said ne was
gong to the Deborah Nursery TO cut The mar OF
several children, At the nursery IT was sala thaJ
Bodner cut the chidTen's hair several weeks ago
and that he had not been there since. MIS- Douhei
said that she paid $50 to a lawyer who promised
to find her husband, and she was penulleSs WIeh
she applied TO the police for AID.
CONDENSATION AND APPROVAL DIVIDED.
Fire Commissioner PurToy yesterday presented to
his colleagues report upon recent controversy
between Mr.. Fmdlay, counsel 10 the Board ana
Inspector EsteTbTOOk OF the Bureau 0l DuIluiHGs.
The difficulty was in regard - a violation OF thc
Building law committed by Alderman Duny i@st
wear. Mr. Duffy built four dweilng-hou'eS at
Fnurth-avP. and Seventy-seVenth-st. HIS plans
were filed III MAY, 1852, but the buildings We're ot
constructed according TO the pans ana lhNpeS'UI
Esterbrrok discovered that wooden Orders had
been used where the law required IRON gIdeis' lno
case WAS put into the hands OF MT. flh"IaN lot
prosecution. and he recently Obt AIMED Judgment
against Mir. Duffy. Although Mr.. DuhV Is oDlleeu
10 nav fine for violating the law, Inspector Ester
brook has been obliged to begin new proceedings In
order to have the violation removed " lHe S"OH,i
tuition Of iron Orders. Two oil the houses nave
been sold hy MIR Duffy IN the meantime, ana >u'lS
will have to be brought against the purchasers
Iuspeclor Esterbrook found fault with Mr.. Find
LAWS aclop III suing for he penalty instead OF Tor
the removal OF the violation lie also thought mat
Nr FiudIay was TO he blamed for permitting the
sale of the houses tu innocent purchasers.
Mr Purroy reported yesterday that Inspector
EsteIbrOUb's zeal IN enforcing the law haa IL" MN
into mistakes. Mr.. FIndlay's method ui proceeding
against Mr. Duffy was correct from legal stand
POINT he thought, and the delay III The case was
unavoidable. The persons who purchaser TWO 81
the houses must have known OF the SUIT against
Mr.. Duffy ana of their own Tcsp3u>Gh'E IN inc
future. Regret was expressed thar Mt, lhnidl aIu
Mr. EstcTbroOk had misunderstood each other
While each was to bc commended for the part taken
by HIM IN enforcing the law, MIR. Puuoy thought
NOT he siInDorted Commissioners Van Colt and
German voted to adopt the report