The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1883-12-06

surErsI COURT.
r'......t.. N..s. sd Young " Co,,ifotn
ru.. opinion by Deany, ].
..i... ...,.',,e r..r for goods delivered,
..rI accepiauCes had been
T, ..rHe... esents the proposition
.... ... ..p, count had been closed
'.',..,rr,.u. % maintained on that
1877 +, s....r r,xas, 40. Piainuh AS
I, W. ...asI.. toto or bill OF accept
-.. p. Fag. DO .pen account does not
al ..r.,...t debt in the absence
-.-. ,rl-.... snt to that effect, and
the burden 1' urUFDg sucu a%reenehs 10
On the Fcly charging tne phy
mr1l and when suGh n9'es OF
sins af alse1ranc. necome due ana aIe nv
-. ,b. qr.1uet Held, ii in fact the
lr,isr yras u10u q eudants to SHOW the
notes were MvpE iH settlement OF the &C.
-oraf doc ieuJ. ..rl OF one OF the pam,
sirs ,rtra3rrsd .n evidence established
Iet lsc+ aud .glloWng the decision IN VII
Lirsor gs TU0.aule-, the Juisment Is re-
yersel aus cause famanded; ,I,u
Gran. vs. Ie.rs Ut Walls'. from hni
co1ntv gpn.3u ~ Waits, j., adopted
An aerraueus 20 convey land IN IeAA s
- .,r-,-9 he ance OF iiual title and
rrlrr 90 fng adoption oil the c0hstl'u ~ ~ y,
~. -.-'se tEe-ffr sited The agreement
80. ts f9ludA On OF this suit is there
y7,.rf.g su,. "a not be enforced Inc
50 ,t5e.If1r made January 8, '36,
i,.i-, 81. .5ls.i,. 4 OF law, could not aid
-. s.ral ses!au, in G1y way, or give II
80 ..rcs ar reliability. No equi'
aus va s.-.-.a5 ,q .yor OF the Cham oler
M eig .siet h. N 4 appellees. Affirmed.
IVY r.' IS sr ys 8.,an 81 al, from Dallas
,,,n,s, Ggirtoa at DslanV, j. adopted
Ihe case presents ..s s'nstT Gnotice of The
appellate slaEe la. Aeu 49, aI'oaIi@ss9 The
vendor l'sp ia isslt y. "pr &c showed
deed o. iaN l.tNA ~. 5,tt 80 money
GA ,ts .lcs ." u ~ y'1' 90 moi neces.
vas unF-"- t,a t oroonnt should
esSery .aft l.' 4a0' cI,as tl,a fsc,
be STAYED in ite ecu 10 800 81. 10
that Bryan AZ. 3'- suosVi.u - IL H., "
Tor another .fty' ~ loHs % - &c fsce
not Tsl. H44Isleu. 10 -, Grtv ot the
showe1 enough t.' i'thG ~ "a TX TeyaS 81 n
purchaser 70 MAKE -' quit 80 oberg.d
PlsH.H error ere snI ,;' ero'' Girrsd
with ta zee r. s"s ~ 80, p,rl,er conntv
Rusgs a1g p4sA-A j lIDtn a Tha onIv
0unisa by Dg.auy adop'eu. ine On
material error Sc raista 70 tuo coutv ,nat
ira ur .nla.ng QUE yo1e ~ ,as iiy
"a 1869, UL-5 4drs. Jones' was i,t
ing on the lana n q ues.ion "'.,.l5
appellant yeldHI .Dlu ~ -, a.
f. settlement VIII y, z ~ '.,,.o,,eI.y iThr
convey -et ,he iS'lI -4 - rr;afr5 M.
otisCCCI IS inst OteH4ah saw e. ,l
Ai5 settlement heIo: ~ pug NJ.
-7uaIc nave been auhlisS III ,-,'- az
II was 8dmisa,oie against ~ '''' ~ -
q guiJ clam uta~ .4"-n ', ~. .,li,t fstrs
was OglI claim ana ttall2'etl ~ - Nv
interest aud claim OF sls 'e,,'o ~ 80, A..
the land. - 1eAas ~
Affirmed. ,-t r.o,, I.s,-.
Evans gl al vs., AaEt5i ~ H. NJ
u.sas county OcimoA u} De.a"s
adcLttt. TIE surviving "hs ".o '"f or.
charge OK the commuhliJ SUE ~,
pies 3 poslGot uhe .'lU' VI, li,.,,.,,Ci end
srecutor and Tie tIo Nauc9 aug .
approval ot clslIn N Iu-A 49, ~. -. n.
7ive Il Guy EiuIt,y tV'. g'''oi ,sn III.
tho same class. ga "a 80 ,.g,d Mira Tay
claim was preserved agfa ....1 ~ an ~ +.
Tor va Informed 700 existence ~ % yailo l
claim una 10 - i.lo"t4 ~ ..1' ~ ~
ta4 made az or3ldef-Slt ptpttt9a ~, -
r..sIeu-r. oil The es.aLs. NoIs.Iv H.,
-ou15 .tcI With tae .aoi thlL IL go ~,
r. .tntrlisd lOe properly IN amount go
5000 an1 scbedu1e9 lhe .eo'' 40 -
about 81 wv .-e ste W. ..,.t..i -,,d -endered
tor Ms thrown OF hlA t-'i' '-'-,' 80,
less vigilauJ IN press I5 Jo, ''
f9r payment Aii' Aayio' ,,,,i
was conditioned lnh1 nI - ~
faithfully adniris.tr me e1.L.-' ',. -
Art 549A) Que ~ hei ul'-e. naa ~ ~
the debts OF me commune f,Is estate was
Of th . common properly 80, no r,ta
'nsolvent she SHOULD pay tn his claim
Where creoltoE iaits 80 ~ bas exhausted The
pr8uerty IN the payment VI ueOts NC ~.
NOT hold her and her suTe'Iss ~, ~
on ne bond. los Ie1ss,l Pue MI" a'in,,, .at'
rl'm was properly p'i,1aS 20 a nIo rats,
..s alaintifis were entitled 10 pr i1 10
a lis was not done the sg'e, ,ld ,o upon
bond are liable heVetseu raSsiia ca,,ntv
l.tulla VS.; LaAsoIi aSnnisd Annellsnt
el. Hnsihe land in question thIoe gn NhIious
rsr. ss from one NILS wien iaii'1 i,,S =,
ils applicstion 10 puIcnoso ,I,,2,,rr Nd
ru..rDversey, he was county ~ 'Tb; "a,
AZ. llS p z. was IN Ioi Se. ~ NIilis ~
sr'.e made y penal 1890 nv he con
directly o. indirectly - o,y 'SnnhI,
gl.urdi in me pu IaOdm ss there used in
ola-d what is usual designstsid a' puU
re"~ol 'and. Mllla app'i p.l.n 4. ,,,,c
.o-e, ana all iuItneI "a &c rsnd.e re-
gr1eP'the land are YOU anu ess,,od
ciT.d m title 10 tne IAsu, ,-,no r-,v,
Cusllsr vs.. the sta' .aoniod n,
oauuty. Opinion ~ wa" va, -. -, bSangat re
ac, uuder "hleh 'a ~ evidence q
rsi the TUE OI r. 80 ecoo,o
iH TO tue lana sueu III, l1t W r. g.
D4sv or 10 MED Wiz the pe'llit"' ,,a,,,to,
sirament accompanying tns pe',,i s,i
herein did not cons,1 ,lL ,.-' ,,rric,i,
Goner ga Texas ~ Ane ~ ~ 80 4,
cKc uded the TRANSLATED CODY ~ Wv oaarris'
gisi'o made 70 tne Guy ~ sbow
1901 No proper oll OF sLos ", n,
rul la this instrumeut, y. oiS ~ 4, n canne
enc anton nor W. w. WIN ~
be- r1nsiderd. Amin %. II ,.,r, Will
Wright et al W. Maul et a. t tToln WV
.aEH11 county. Oplhlvu ,ha si,si,
rloried. This case piese L. vi ,bst a.
1ursfion, Goes the eNlosl Nc =, ma Wrigbt
r.n ITS were the heifs ol Ds w n,ai
th aDtee Of the lane sueo III He Va