The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1883-01-06
OF PUBLICATION.
NO 81 EQUITY.

In the Orphans Court of Carroll County sit
ting in Equity.
Charles B. Nelson ct al, vs. James Martin.
Franklin o. Wiles, ct al
The object of this suit is to obtain a decree
for the sale of certain piece of land situate
in Carroll county, in the State of MARYLAND,
which is part ofthe Real Estate devised by
the provisions of the last will and testament
of Burgess Nelson, late of said county and
State, deceased, unto George w. H. Nelson,
Charles B. Nelson and Zachariah w. S. A.
Nelson as tenants in common together and to
their heirs; and for the distribution of the
proceeds OF the same among those properly
entitled thereto.
The Bill states that by the provisions of said
will said devise was not to take effect until
the youngest son of said testator should have
attained the age of twenty-one years; that the
Real Estate of said testator not heretofore dis
posed of, and embraced in said will, consists
of parcel of land containing four acres, three
roods and twenty-six punches of land, more
or less, of the value of about four hundred
dollars; that said Zachariah w. S. A. Nelson
is the youngest child of said testator and has
long since arrived at the age of twenty-one
years; that George W. H. Nelson, one of said
devisees, departed this life intestate in or
about the year 1868, in the city of New Or
leans in the State of Louisiana, unmarried
and without issue; and that he left surviving
him the following brothers and sisters his only
heirs at law to whom his interest in said Real
Estate descended as tenants in common, to.
wit Charles b. Nelson, John W. Nelson,
Emma Buckingham, wife of Eli Buckingham,
William B. Nelson, Henry C.. Nelson, James
P. Nelson, Matilda Ebaugh, wife of Jesse r.
Ebaugh, Zachariah w. s. A. Nelson, Sarah
Martin, wife of George Martin, Eliza Wies,
wife of Henry G. Wiles, (who has since died
interstate, and Milissa Richards, wife ofDavid
Richards, all whom were at the time of his
death adults above the age of twenty one
years; that said Miissa Richards, husband is
dead, and since his death she has married the
said Henry G. Wiles, and the said Milissa
subsequently departed this life in Washington
county, in the State of Maryland, interstate,
leaving Henry G. Wiles, her husband and chill.
dren heirs at law surviving her; that said
Sarah Martin, wife of George Martin, departed
this life intestate in the year 1868, in Mont.
gomery county, Missouri, leaving her husband,
George Martin, and the following children her
only heirs at law surviving her, to-wit: James
Martin, Theodore Martin, George H. Martin
Peter Martin, John Martin, Sarah V. Martin,
Carrie NJ. Martin and Alice A. Martin, all of
whom reside in said county, in the State of
Missouri, and out of the State of MARYLAND,
and that the complainants are not informed
whether they or any of them are adults or in
fants; that said William B. Nelson died intes-
tate as to his interest therein in the year 1878,
leaving Rachel A. Nelson, his wife, and chill
dren his only heirs at law surviving him; that
said undivided one-third part of said Real
Estate descended to and vested in all the par
ties aforesaid as tenants in common with the
compliments, Charles B. Nelson and Zacha-
riah W. S. A. Nelson, who are seized of the
other two-thirds part of said parcel of land;
that said Real Estate cannot be divided with
out loss or injury to the parties interests
therein, and decree is prayed for sale of
| the same, and for the distribution of the pro-
ceeds thereof among the parties entitled
thereto.
1t is thereupon adjudged and ordered this
21st day of December, A. D. 1882, that the
compliments, by causing copy ofthis order
to be inserted in some newspaper published
at Carroll county, in the State of Maryland,
once week for four successive weeks before
the 26th day of January, 1883, give notice to
the said absent defendants of the object and
substance of this bill; and warn them to appear
in this Court in person or by solicitor on or
before the 26th day of April next, to answer
the premises and show cause, if any they have,
why decree ought not to pass as prayed.
j. OLIVER WADLOW,
Register of Wills.
True copy,-Test:
j. OLIVER WADL0W,
dec 23-5t Register of Wills.