The Austin weekly statesman. (Austin, Tex.) 1883-1898, 1883-04-19


clerk.
brownBon. administrator, VS.. Lloyd
Scaul9n ct al; from Waller county. Re-
versed ard remanded as to RaImeter. and
st1rmed AS to Skannel.
Russell ct al VS.. Freedman q Co.;
from navarro county. Reversed and
Remainder. Report of commission OF APP
peals adopted.
county. Reversed and remsnded.
Williamson ct al vs.. Conner; from
Lamar county. Affirmed.
Morrill, VS.. Bartlett ct al; from Red
River county. Motion for rehearing
overruled, and leave given to amend
motion as motion forrehearing within
twenty days. Willie, G. j., not sitdng<f
Sewers VS.. Peterson; from DailaSl
county. Affirmed.
Settle ct al VS.. Leathers; from Mont
ague county. Reversed and remandad.
Wheel0ck vs.. Pointer and Wife; from
Dallas county. Submitted on brief ofap
pellant.
Loving ct al We. Miniken; from ParkerI
| county. Submitted on brief of both par
ties.
Vandea;rif vs. Piercy: from Parker
county. Same order rs above.
Jones and wife VS.. Carver ct al; IRON
Dallas county. Submitted on brief of
Clayton VS.. Kendall Il Emery, from
Parker county. Submitted on briet of
both parties.
CT ,ytor VS.. Randall & Darling; from
Parker county. Submitted on briefs of
both parties.
Clayton VS.. Brown; from Parker coun-
| ty. sum tied on briefs OF both parties.
Clayton vs.. Benedict 81 Co.; from Par
ker county. Submitted on briefs Of both
| parties.
Thompson ct nj VS.. Comstock ct al;
from Wise county. Submitted on bnef
OF appellant.
Tatum VS.. Harris ct III; from Collin
county. Submitted on brief of both
parties.
Taylor VS.. Campbell; from Collin
county. Submitted on briefs for both
| parties.
Truitt VS.. Blundsl; from Clay county.
| Submitted on brief for both parties.
| Andrews ct al VS.. Andrews; from Ellis
county. Submitted on briefs and oral
arguments Tor both parties.
| WhitloW VS.. result OF elections; from
Wichita county. Submitted on brief for
| appellant.
Sanger Bros. ct al VS.. Oglesby; from
Collin county. Submitted on briefs for
both parties.
Bumpaa ct al VS.. Spencer ct al: from
Dallas county. submitted on briefs for
both parties>
Fort Worth and Denver City railway
Va. Dabuey ct al; from Wise county.
Submitted on briefs OF both parties and
oral argument for appellant.
HOrnback ct al VS.. Ellers; from Wise
county. Submitted on brief for both par
ties.
Evans 4, Martin VS.. Tucker; from W Use
county. Submitted on brief of appellant.
Browder ct al VS.. Ry an ct al; from Dali
las county. Submitted on motion TO af-
firm.
Fl. and T. G. railway VS.. Weir; from
Ellis county. Affirmed without reference
| to the merits.
II. and II. G. railway VS.. .owley; from
Ellis county. Same order as above.
J. +. Poterfed vs.. G. M. Harper; from
Ellis county. Submitted GU briefs Of
both parties.
F.O. Dewey VS.. G. w. Gillespie; from
Tarrant county. Motion TO dismiss sub
United.
T. & P. RR. Co VS.. Levi & Bro;
from Dallas county. Submits on briefs
and on oral argument for arpellees.
T. x p. II X. Co. VS.. NJ. Il. Dye ct al.
fIom Dallas county. Submitted on br efs
aud written arguments for both parties,
and on oral argument for appellee.
7. IL z. Il. r Co. VS.. Mary Burns;
from Tarrsnt county. Submitted on
briefs and written argument for both
parties, and on oral argGn.cnt for ap-
peliee.
T. 81 P. r. r. Co. VS.. j. Howard
and wife; from TaIrant county. Sub
mitted on briefs and written argument
Tor both parties, and on oral argument
for appellee.
t. A u 2. Fay VS.. Queen insurance
company; from GraysOn county. Sub
mit,ed on briefs of both parties.
j. j. Reeks vs.. w. G. u II. Smith;
from Dallas county. Submitted on briefs
for both parties.