Mexico weekly ledger., 1883-02-01
Circuit Court Proceedings.

unc
Crews VS. Daugherty, motion to
strike out amended petition.
Shock VS. Shock, amended answer
filed.
Brooks vs. c & A r R, motion for
new trial sustained.
Woodward vs. Wells motion for new
trial filed.
City Of Mexico vs. Hall, molten
amended.
Brashear VS. West, report of COM
missioner filed and approved, motion
to commute dover filed, ID. Z. Shea,
commissioner, acknowledged deed to
J. J. and Jos. G.. Brashear.
Bragg VS. City of Moberly, plain
tiff remit all over 81 1880 motion over
ruled and judgment for plaintiff.
State VS. v. B. Griswell, pleaded
guilty and fined $40.
Crawford VS. Draper, continued by
consent.
Elder vs. Burwell, continued by
consent.
Hit VS. Roberts, continued.
Kramer ct al vs. Haislip, verdict for
plaintiff for S120.4O.
/ Dolan IS City of Moberly, verdict
for plaintiff for s1.425. Motion in
arrest and to set aside verdict and for
new trial filed.
State VS. Reavis, continued by agree
ment.
State VS. Kelley. forfeiture of recog-
milton.
Ogle VS. Ogle, motion for additional
order sustained, guardian ad Item $40.
Spencer vs. johnson, motion to dis.
miss appeal.
w. H. White vs. Shell & Smith,
judgment.
Mr.. Hardin, attorney, was intro.
duced to the court by d. H. Gentry
and permitted to sign the roll of at.
torneys.
Patterson VS. Stark, judgment made
final.
Lissauer & Sonheim VS. Fetter. judg'
ment less amount credits, S335.98
Hathaway vs. Currie, leave to flt
amendment, answer in GO days, anG
leave to reply thereto and continued
at defendants cost.
Baker vs. Larimore, continued by
consent.
Davis VS. McClurg, judgment TO
defendant.
Cox vs. Upton, motion for securit,
for costs.
Sims VS. Curtis Field, amended mo
ton for new trial filed.
Osborne vs. Brown, judgment TO
81, OO0..
Stewart VS. Stewart, dismissal, a
) plaintiff cost.
Gilbert vs. Sturgeon, appeal dis
missed.
Collier and Dougherty vs. Crews e
al, motion for security for costs over
ruled.
Crews VS. Collier, demur filed.
Hamilton VS. Shafer, dismissed 8
defendants cost.
l Lendenburt VS. Fletcher ct al, pc
tItion filed and order made.
, State VS. Branstetter, plea Of nc
not guilty entered and reading of in
dictment waived and released o
$500 bond.
Young VS. Young, report Of sal
approved, deed to w. H. White az
knowledged and ordered.
: Hughes vs Carson, motion to di:
miss filed.
Fetter VS. Wiseman, trial by cou1
evidence.
D Brookmire and Rankin VS. Humpl
ries and Phillips, judgment for plair
, tiff's for S567.O3.
Carson VS. Porter, trial by jury, a
, gument all made, and jury dismisse
until Monday morning.
Calvin Bros. vs. Reighley, order r,
l newed.
; White vs. Shell & Smith, motto
for new trial filed.
Holloway VS. City ofMoberly, lea,
to answer in 80 days and continued
Coats VS. Ragsdale, dismissed
plaintiffs cost.
Hill VS. Peery, dismissed, each pa
ty to pay one-half costs.
Martin VS. Norris, bond for cos
filed.
State VS. S Barker, pleaded gull
and fined $40.
State VS. V. NJ. Barker, pleads
guilty and fined $40.
Waddingham VS. Waddingham, m
ton for alimony.
Sohon VS. Naylor, cent damage
plaintiffs cost.
" Better VS. Huff, motion for new r
u plevin bond, sustained and leave
file same in 20 days.
:: Barchard VS. Miller, trial by coul
judgementlfor plaintiff for$75.
Gentry vs. Clark, A. C. Cassidy e
|e tiers appearance and ase continued
IS johnson vs. Woodward, injuncti'
is made perpetual.
Stark vs. Rector, leave to plead
If go days aud continued.
,o Tabitha Bugs vs. Joe Bugs, q
,r cree Of divorce granted.
To the Public.
N Owing to the increase in the SITES
-