National Republican., 1883-02-06
TIE LOCAL CouRTs.
The Week Opens with Good Amount
Of Legal Business.
AN INJUNCTION AGAINST THE BOUNDARY

Of Legal business.
AN INJUNCTION AGAINST THE BOUNDARY
SEWER.
Margaret Coulson, Charles Coulson and Nell
lie, Elizabeth Maggie, and Agnes Coulsen, by
their next friend Margaret Coulson, have filed
n bill in equity against the commissioners of
the District of Columbia and William j.
Acker aud George Neitzey, praying for an in
junction to restrain defendants from eXca-
waiting on the ground of compainants. The
ground is ON Boundary and $ streets, with
improvements, and the bill AYERS that the
commissioners and the said Ackcr and
Neitzey are digging UP within the limits of
their ground to construct sewer without
their permission. The petitioner states that
the excavation threatens to tumble the house
over, thus turning them into the street,
without any compensation from the defend
ants.
Judge james after hearing, granted the in
Junction restraining the defendants from en-
tcring the property of the complainant and
making excavation there.
NO RIGHT no ISSUE AN ATTACHMENT.
In the court in general term yesterday, in
the case of Wallace VS.. Chesley, where an at
tachmcnt of goods for rent was issued by u
magistrate, il was decided that the magistrate
had no right to issue the attachment, and the
case was sent back.
a PATENT CASE.
In the case of Runstcllcr ct al VS.. Deere
and MansOr where the Complainants COM
planned cerluinrd inventions patented by
others to be their own. Justice Cox delivered
the opinion of the court affirming the decree
below without finding it necessary to decide
as between the parties which Of them orgi-
mated tho invention described in the caNcat.
SUIT FOR PARTITION.
Henry X. Willard, by his attorneys, Cook
& Cole, has flied "a bill in equity against
Joseph c. Willard, rccitmg that Inc is seized
in fec of one undivided unu.haG part of lot >,
square go, in Washington city and Joseph G.
Willard j. seized OF The other undivided half
llo charges that the sad real estate is sus-
ceptiblc Of partition between the two, and
prpys for its PARTITION; or, II ihut cannot be
done with advantage to bOtr, that the lot may
bo sold aud the proceeds divided according to
The respective interests of each.
ANOTHER DIVORCE WANTED.
Annie Il. Rowlcs, through her attorney, w.
ID. Cassin, has filed q bill for divorce IRON
Edw. u. Rowlus The bin AYERS that the
parties were married juno a., 1868. Seven
children have been born OF tho marriage, Of
whom three are living. she alleges drunken
ness ON his part, failure to support and cruel
treatment. For the last three years he has
been !, drunlard. In 1910 he deserted her for
five months, and frequently has hCer away for
u week al time. lie has often threatened
to kill her.
A PRFsESTMENT IGNORED.
The grand jury ignored the prcsentment
against John ". Carey of assault with intent
to commit rape on Mary A. Lawlor
PROBATE business.
cThe probate court has ordered tho sale of
the property of John +. Crutchct, deceased
and ordered the appointment Of Emily B.
Thompson as adminlstratX of the property Of
Egbert Thompson, deceased, and bonds fixed
at $1,000.
THE EEcDhD.a
Supreme Cont IN Glperdt 2,rHi-Chicf Lustce Cart
ter, JultctS Hugi,y uud Cor-MulWcD U.s. ChUsley; /;
motion 10 s,t usuU Judgment utt JnstCG OF the
peace sustained and c"sc scat ynek, Rumsteler
court below. In rc ChureSE, scott; appeal from
thr auycrc decision QFCUmmissoncr of patents
signment for to9hy-23, D. 80, 57l, Us, 80, 4G, A
Egluiy 1GUrtIJu.lCs JdiBss-SOi5. Tucker vs.
ohlscn; coig6ut To idem duwuns, Lucy shall be
Lucinda. t'ilj. ConIum vs.. District vi Columbia;
bill ready hearing on application for rest ana
order hScd for p. IN. $50 DudgG vs. Onley:
culseF 20 contrmalionS ol ,nudiur'h report.
5Si6,fNOh IiuHkG vs.. William hoakc; submitted
on ,prOpOsHl; tcmpOm lCuuctiUn of HlimOny.
800. GuntUn vs. Znni@lugeri submitted oil petl-
uon, SlO1 Phciier vs.. Stlaning 'alGs finally
ratified ana uonurmed. Glv2. Moore VS.. Harrison
receiver james Il. Payne appointed under stipulu
tiou. Sill. Walter ". kinlmcll appea ance of
uDscnl uricH ullt uIut!tu' AuJouruIu sing ule'
Crcut Court-Just,ce MlcArthuT.-Nu "A l6l. KOn-
dan lisU vs.. Hogan " w.; time extended thiity
duys 10 plead. Nc. lO7. suGu3 Vs. FrlGk; verdict
Tor Iluini H. slUO No. lOJ. SONS and Daughters ui
Libety 40, / vs.. White et ~. jury Withdrawn and
court leave TO hOth pnrtiea to amend No. Ill.
Williamson vs.. Hill, jE; jury rcspited; continued.
Adjournment until 10 II. III. to-day.
EQUhy COtut- NClg Sps.--Nu. s,ll5. Henry X. VIII
lara vs. Joseph e. Willard; bill tor partition. Cook
d Cole, attorneys. M. Slll. MarjajGJ Coulsou et
a.vs. The District Of lumDa; bill Tor INJUNCTION.
CsrcuH COTi--NaU SUus,-Iohunnc u. Langhton
VS., samuel L. luGkgtt, constable. Action OF re-
plgyeu, W.. Nj Ter, attorney.