The Lambertville record. [volume] (Lambertville, N.J.) 1872-1968, 1883-04-18

( Twenty-one grand Jurors responded
the call of their names by Clerk Hyde
They were sworn, and the Chief Justic
stated to them that his attention had bee
called to no special matter to charge then
on, and that they should choose their OF
ficers and proceed to the discharge of thei
duties. Next came the applications 70
license, On account of the new lcens
law passed last winter all the application
were laid over to . p. NJ, when the fol
lowing licenses were granted
Flemington--Wm II. Force, IT., lam
bert Humphrey.
Glen Gardner-Edward Humphrey
Clinton Borough--Emanuel Johnson
Reaville--Calvin Hill
Little York-How Mettlen
neutrality-suspicious. Bonnell.
Mt. Pleasant-Dayis Taylor.
Frenchtown Borough james Opdycke
VIM, c. Apgar,
New Germantown--Anstin Clark
Bloomsbury-George Schenck.
Lebanon--John Lowe.
Sergeantsville--Jacob X. Wilson.
Three Bridges-D. p. Schomp.
Baptisttown-A. w. Baldwin.
Clinton Borough-John B. Weller.
Perryville-W G.. Mettler.
High Bridge-Mark G. Devlin.
Ringoes-J p. Rittenhouse.
Annandale--Joseph S. Holden.
Junction-S. p. Hodgkiss.
The following applications were laid
ever until Saturday of this week :
Quakertown-Abra S. Little.
New Hampton--James Smith.
The following were refused
White Hall-Thomas L. Anderson
West End-Godfrey Emery.
Mlford-Robert X. Sinclair.
After a few Common Pleas motions,
the list of cases noticed for trial, were
called. The following is the list, which is
unusually small, as Our readers will see
SUPREME COURT.
|. John NJ. Brown VS.. William Farley. Case. Il.
u. W. Ii. Gilmore.
g Rose b. Wilson VS. Julia Bowen Case Noor-
hees < Cottcr--L. II Phillips
B. Susan A Roger VS.. John Lane. Trespass. \.
c, Hulsizer-ii, b. Herr.
!. Gardner j. Fisher vs.. George Banehon. Case.
Voorhees, x Coter-C. \. Skillman.
. George Banchoif vs. Henry shalt2. Case {.
A. Skiman-S. L, Perry.
g. VIM. NJ. Sine VS.. John c. BerhighicSer. Case.
John Schomp-H. b. Herr.
CIRCUIT COURT,
I, Christopher Starner, ct. al, vs.. Naham W
Tomson. Case. G. =. Conkling-Noorhees x Largr.
2. Harrison Apgar VS. John A. Seals Case. A.
{. lIulsizer-N Voorhees, 4 Large.
3. Matilda Lowe VS.. Margaret Hummer, ct. al.
Case. X, s. kuhl-A. c. Hulsizer.
4. William Fulper VS. Josiah @ iIoagaud Tres
pass. T.. r. Conkling-Noorhees & Coter.
.. John w. Sharp vs. Catharine a. Apgar. Re
plevin. Voorhees, 4 Cotter-r. ]. Hoffman.
4. John W. Sharp VS. Edward ]. Apgar Re
pevin. Voorhees, 4 C0tter-f. j. Holman
Johl {. Weleh VS.. John e. Femly. Case. j.
Bulluck-H. b. Herr.
derson J. Probaseo. Case. Noohees K Coiter--R.
.. Josiah b johnson, appellant vs.. cornelia h
Voorhees, & Coter,
10. Alfred c. Candy VS. Henry G. Holeombe. re-
pleyin John Lilly. A. sIilman.
IL. James l.. Wandling Mary +. Sharp, Case
CASTOR x Bergen--A. A. clark.
~ William Rttenhouse vs. Daniel B01nc Case.
G. A. Skilman-Noorhecs X Cotier.
Il. Jacob L. Apgar Carrot c. Hoffman. re-
pleViu. John III. Nnnn-O 2. Ghamheflin.
The first case called was No. |, on the
Supreme list-Joseph NJ. Brown VS.. VIM
Farley. This was an action to declare t.
whom the title of certain land belonged
Verdict for defendant.
No. 2, on the Supreme list was settled
No, 3, on tho same list was the next case
tried. 1t was an action in trespass t. re
cover damages for trees cut down by the
defendant. on land which had been add
Judged to be plaintiffs in a previous ac.
ton Of ejectment. The jury rendered a
verdict of 1915 for plaintiff.
No. G, same list, was next taken up,
and resulted in verdict for the plaintiff
The next case moved was No. T, on the
Circuit list, and was soon disposed of, the
Court ins.ructing the jury to find for the
plaintiff.
No. 0, on the same list, was then tried
and a verdict of $iGG. 30 was rendered for
the plaintiff, being the whole amount of
his claim, less $5.G2 which was barred by
the statute of limitations.
This ended the civil business of the
term, all the other cases being disposed of
in one way or another without trials.
Those cases in which Chas A. Skillm an.
Esq, of Lambertville, was interested,
went off for the term, because of the in
disposition OF that gentleman. The Chief
Justice on Wednesday afternoon, dis
charged the general panel Of Jurors until
Monday the Odd inst, when they will re-
turn to try erimina cases. Justice APP
peals have been Sc down for May 24th.
The Grand jury broke up on Thursday
afternoon and were discharge by Lay
Judge Sandersop, after rendering the
thanks of the County for the services rem
dered. They presented nine bills of indict.
ment