Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1883-04-04
Chicago, Milwaukee & st. Paul Railway

respondent. Submitted on briefs.
The Minnesota Central Railroad Com
pony, appellant, VS.. August Peterson, re-
| spondent. Submitted on briefs.
The Minnesota Central Railroad Com
pany, appellant, VS.. Nels p. Peterson,
| respondent. Submitted on briefs.
Edward Casey, respondent, VS.. Erick
Sevaston, Appellant. Passed.
Elizabeth G. Schmitt, respondent, VS..
Henry CaSselins, appellant. Respondent
moved to dismiss, April 4.
Minneapolis Harvester Works, appel
lant, vs.. S. Il. Smith and G. T. E. Culver,
respondents, April &c.
Hubert Moulton and Geo. p. Scobey,
partners, etc, respondents, VS.. the st. Paul,
Minneapolis aad Manitoba Railway Com
pany, appellant, June 6.
Michael Mattigan, respondent, VS.. John
Mead and John Roach John Mead), appel
liant, May 2.
Robert Little, respondent, vs.. Anthony
MILFORD, ct al, appellants, May %.
Richard II. Jones, respondent, VS.. Doril-
us Morrison, Clinton Morrison, 81. G. o.
Morrison, Sabin S. Murdoch, John F. APP
pleby and The Minneapolis Harvester
Works, appellants, June z.
Gustav Schlender, appellant, VS.. FL. B.
Corey, respondent, motion by respondent
to dismiss appeal, April ID.
Catherine Hoy, respondent, VS.. Thomas
MCGOWAN, appellant, April 6.
J. K. Mansfield, appellant, VS.. A. L. Stew
ems, defendant, American Fire Insurance
company of Philadelphia, garnishee, re-
spondent, June 6.
Margaret Cole, respondent, VS.. Harvey c.
| Shepard, appellant, May IA.
John Leppla, appellant, VS.. Frank j.
| Mackey and Elijah A. Harmon, implicated
with Stephen Slosson, respondents, April
%.
Mary E. Braden, appellant VS.. the city of
Hastings, respondent; respondent moves
to strike case from the calendar, April 4.
Ellen L. Coolbaugh, appellant VS.. Eliza
J. Roemer, respondent, April IS.
| William II. Wiebeler, respondent VS.. the
Milwaukee Mechanics Mutual Insurance
company, appellant, May 16.
Hiram Berkey, respondent, VS.. Mary
Ann NJ. Judd, James R. M. Gaskill, Ariel
Eldridge, as executors, and d. NJ. Sabin
| (defts. Sabin, Gaskill and Eldridge, APP
pellants), contin ued.
Andrew Nelson, respondent VS.. Gunder
Peterson, A. Peterson, and Erick Gunder-
son, appellants; appellant moves to con-
tinue under rule -; continued.
| Francis Martin, respondent VS.. John NJ.
BoveY, Rufus J. Baldwin, Caroline L.
Baldwin, and Eugene ID. Wilson Caroline
L. Baldwin, appellant), April IS.
| Runald MCMILLAN, respondent, VS.. Chris
topher w. Cheney and Henry Cheney
| appellants, Mays.
Peter al. Mark, as administrator of the
estate of Axel G. Hemberg, deceased, ap-
| pellant, VS.. the st. Paul, Minneapolis and
ManitobaRailway company, respondent;re-
| spondent moves to correct return, May IL
! Hans Vail, respondent, VS.. Swan Wal
ton, appellant, May 81.
| Ole n. Skaaraas and A. Gothron, re-
spondents, VS.. Andrew ]. Finnegan, appel
liant, May 81.
Anthony Herber, respondent, vs.. Halvor
Christopherson, ST., William Cressy and
Mary Greasy, appellants, April IL.
| Agatha Klein, appellant, VS.. the ST. Paul
Minneapolis q Manitoba railway COM
pany, respondent, May 1.
James J. Bourgeois, appellant, VS.. the
| st. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Rail
way company, respondent, passed
John Kopp, appellant, VS.. the st. Paul,
Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway COM
| pany, respondent, passed.
Cecilia O. Lorenzer, appellant, VS.. the
| st. Paul, Minneapolis d Manitoba Railway
| company, respondent, passed.
Albert Scheffer, George f. Fuick and
| Charles Nelson, as executors and trustees
of the last will and testament of Charles
| Schefer, deceased, respondent, VS.. the
| National Life Insurance company of the
United States of America, appellant; re-
spondent moves to dismiss appeal and to
affirm judgment, June IL.
Frederick Boetcher, respondent, vs..
Charles Staples, appellant, April 6.
In the matter of the petition of Dennis
Leary and Pauline Bang for the appoint
| ment of a receiver of the property of
Pauline Croft, respondents, VS.. Pauline
Croft and W. ". Doty, appellants; re-
| spondents move to dismiss appeal, May %.
Gottlieb Kaune, respondent, VS.. the Min
neapolis and st. Louis Railway company,
| appellant, May 3.
Rufus I. Downs, respondent, VS.. Geo. A.
Nourse and Abby L. Newell George A.
Nourse, appellant,) June 4.
Mary r. Bottineau, Eliza Buse and Ed
ward Grusendorf, respondents, VS.. the Etna
Life Insurance company, Frederick T. Day,
Alcey j. Day, E. j. Hodgson, Mary S.
Hodgson, ct al, appellants. Appellant
moves to continue under Rule II, April 6.
Charlotte r. Conger, respondent, VS.. Geo.
W. Nesbitt, appellant, May %.
Charles Leonard, respondent, VS.. Nellie
K. Green and Joseph G. Green, appellants,
May %.
Henry f. Tarbox, respondent, VS.. Michael
German, John German and Maria German,
| appellants, May II.
Elizabeth G. Schmitt, respondent, VS..
| George Schmitt, appellant; respondent
moves to dismiss, April 4.
A. K. Doe, respondent, VS.. the County
Commissioners of the County of Washing
ton, and James G. Foley as county auditor
of said county, April 30.
Charles G. Roberts, respondent, VS.. the
Mazeppa Mill company, appellant, April
26.
James H. Weed and j. H Sanders, ap-
pellants, VS.. the Little Falls Il Dakota
| Railroad company, Henry Willard, W. h.
Starbuck, William Crooks, Charles A. De-
Graf, ct al, respondents, June IL.
William S. Bedford, appellant, VS.. San
ford S. Small, respondent, May "a.
Rush B. Wheeler, appellant, VS.. Orlando
G. Norman, respondent, April ID.
Annie D. Manson, respondent vs.. the
Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United
/