Daily Republican., 1882-12-16
|ME LYNCH CASE.
I'D TMB APPLICA'
ToR A WnIT OE0UO
~ WARRAHkO'

NV sor thenr 10 agree, the Chiel
Ole l',Sin a, ordered them TO be
iSto Court Hs questioned
.hair inability 30 arrive at
~, md upon the foreman stating
~ "a NOT believe there Was the
Wv Liability Of their ever agree
..hsrred Ihem from further at,
~. iu,ors stated 10 . reporter
~, ~ he time the first ballot was
pn Na ;nrv ' had stood II to l. The
" D,ys in favor Of allowing Mr..
sS n.r week and voted that way
w. fw,re discharged, At first
!. W; i1ror was In favor OF allowing
I:,rt, damages. Il
S,,WardS offered to compromise
ss",bers and allow 81 per week
4. .hole time, and upon this be-
I..,,,d refused to yield any furth'
Y, tosk altogether about forty
IND they oil stood the same, II
!. IA, commenced his argument
a,~,sSted election case at 3. 20
ssN reviewing the affidRvits
1sI been presented. He said
Y, testifed that he was at the
.,slScs All day, and the other affi-
sIH net contradict that fact, but
IA that he Was not at the win
'1day. He sontended that rs the
~ stood they were not q contra
sm impeachment Of Toys state
mid lhas Toy positively swore
aUs we're 80 illegal votes cast at
I'M ChristianA polls on the 7th
November, and this 10 met by
Sisyit Of Henry Dupont and 9th
N they did net believe there were
EIl votes cast.
n h was claimed by the other
a,t they should specify the men
N thus voted Illegally now
hom ,hs possibility OF 80 doing
svot necessary for them to do 80,
hdid not believe the Court would
N /. was enough to know that
,r,n had voted fraudulently.
luld that these afiidAVits could
.ngMded In any other light than
t0phictiDg testimony. Mr.. Toy
h pOSitively that 30 illegal bal
M caSk and ut the proper time
Euld prove the truth of that
can't He commanded that they
nd bound to give their sources Of
nation, noither were thAy called
bIhOW how Thomas Toy knew
aue VOtos were cast. He said
HiAh rule was not granted, 1t
lin because the Court thought
ailrit Of Toy was not conclusive.
h Lore closed at 1 o'clock and Mr..
u opened the closing ArRu-
in Tie respondent. He contend
a Toy had made his affidavit
III upOn belief or information that
lin furnished to him by sther
b thiS ho said would not answer
lIs a. 1t was one in which poe
testimony was required. Accord.
lAs secret way In which the bal
aaductsd according TO law theirs
lM in which Thomas Toy could
IrncVD that 80 ballots were cast
bly, Gcspb by information furnish
i1n by others.
hNklyhl Of his testimony there had
AaP&uNd the affidaVits of others
lhavwEtbe polls all day and who
lsihaa hr as any conscientious
lm tatifJ that to the b~st Of
|hd'hasdEo and belief there were
aIch Illegal votes east. There was
EaI ny In which Thomas Toy
|ad dlIW known of these fraudulent
saiDI pollsd, and that was II
astn were TO como 10 him with
alildI and say we have fraudu-
ahS SOeipts, and We intend to
aH JaUss Martin on these TO.
|hbhGt all likely that any man
Lads tAiSH and yet II he did not
nAlS intormation in this manner
|AaHOt bs considered. He claimed
Egt that the affidavit coHld not be
llh "a positive evidence, as 1t sot
naltain things which it was irn-
aior the atiant TO know As facts.
aginB read from q number of
sRihe' bearing on the case, aud
~ that the rSlatof was bound to
sHAO the illegal voters were. n
9ll decided that they need not
" Il Jeff the respondent perfectly
9@and unable to answer the am
lOald be impossible for tho respon-
9hli who the 80 illegal voters
total votS in the district Of
IAlO!a
Aaid that II Toy would have sesn
salIOtS aS he claimed, then Henry
sAs would have seen them, and
lEould have seen them, and he
" lhlEk that any one would say
HOY could have seen them the
~ officers would have failed to
@Ilsm, and yet all these men give
sthIsnn sfiidavits, and say that TO
@sOt their knowledge no such
Ssfa cast. When Mr.. Higgins
aadsd Chief. j ustice Comsgys said
.9ls case was Of moro importance
.lenAd at fret supposed, and he
W u should be fully examined in
MGte a decision was rendered.
eWeOlten thought 1t was o matter
I should be fully understood before
passed upon. He also thought
luIe was granted, the time for
w The oass should be fixed for
"'n Nnen there WAS not muCh
aas before the Court, as he suppos-
.SOald take six months TO try it.
IGnlst - Justice proposed to render
.'lOn at the Court Of Appeals at
LGn |, the frat Monday In January,
..IuSe Houston said that he did not
ne could be ready by that tine
would bo impossible for him to
s,iamiue all the facts connected
%s \ c& until after the holidays.
I rates had no objection to that
Yang nxed for rendering the de- !
! Out counsel after contering to-
! Tssleed to let the matter rest
! nnesday, the 9Th Of February
y city.
motion for q dissolution of the
y y attachments In the case of Jas.
I,'On' |, was called up by Benjamin
nattS said that he thought he
snow that Aaron lad left this
.u s,'a !he intention Of taking up his
~ : I. In Chicago.
s. I. Money sworn and testified that
aAron left this city last June