The weekly democratic statesman. [volume] (Austin, Tex.) 1871-1883, 1882-05-04

Chief Justice, X. s. Gould; Associate Justices.
M. Ii. Bonner, j: w. Stayton;
Clerk. @. s. Morse.
From Thursdays Daily.l
TUESDAYS PROCEEDINGS.
Mary p. and S. Braden VS.. John A Gose
ct al; appeal from Lamar. Judgment
affirmed. Opinion by Justice Stayton.
W. NJ. Robinson vs.. Ap Williams et al:
appeal from Fannin. Judgment affirmed.
Opinion by Justice Stayton.
j. l.. Jones ct al W. Octavia PyrOn ct
al; appeal from Collin. Judgment ar
| tirmed. Opinion by Chief Justice iould.
5. A. Cook vs.. }. NJ. Lindsay et al ap-
peal from Collin Judgment affirmed.
Opinion by Chief Justice Gould
Smith, Murphy a. Peak VS.. Henry Kub-
Ter; appeal from Iallas. Judgment
affirmed. Oral opinion by Chief Justice
Gould.
Texas Pacific railway company VS.. s.
W jackson; appeal from Parker. AT
frmed on certificate.
w. L. Edmonson VS.. James Connor and
wife error from Dallas. Opinion OF the
commissioners of appeals adopted and
judgment affirmed.
j. II. Z. Sickles ct al VS.. j. L. Sargent;
appeal from Collin. Opinion of the COM
missioners of appeals adopted and iudg-
ment reversed and cause remanded.
B. Bimbaum VS.. W. II. Kuykendall,
administrator; error from Lee. Opinion
OF the commissioners of appeals adopted
and judgment affirmed, with ten per
cent. damages.
Juan Vela VS.. Julian Herrara appeal
from Wilson. Opinion of the commits
sioners of appeals adopted and Judgment
affirmed.
A. A. Kelso VS.. p. T. Adams appeal
from Uvalde. Opinion of the commits
missioners OF appeals adopted. Judg-
ment reversed and cause remanded.
D.L.Gooch VS.. j. S. Johnston; appeal from
Comanche. Opinion of the commission
ers OF appeals adopted. Judgment re-
versed and cause remanded.
Aaron Wolf vs.. f. IL. Mahan appeal
from Williamson. Submitted on briefs
and oral argument of both parties.
f. Bremer VS.. John Case ; error from
Bexar. Motion TO dismiss over lied.
The state of T"vas W.. tts'ass Cook;
appeal from I. ..s. 4'.utisn 10 gtfs pre-
cedence granted.
Smith, Murpry & Peak VS.. Thos Field;
appeal from Dallas. Motion for certio-
rari submitted.
l. a. G.. N. r. r. Co. VS.. G. Lanmen;
appeal from Comal. Motion to dismiss
oyerruled, and motion TO strike out city
ed.
A. j. Ward ct al ys. b. b. Hubbard, gov
ernor; appeal from Travis. Motion 70 give
precedence granted, and appellants
brief suppressed on motion of appellee.
s. q. Eritts vs.. Joseph Roth ct al; APP
peal from Wise. Leave granted TO file
! transcript by agreement and on motion.
1. a. G. N. II. X. company VS.. Joe II.
Stewart error from Travis. Submitted
on briefs and oral argument for both par
ties.
Hallman, clerk, ETC., va. Campbell APP
peal from Travis. Submitted on briefs
and oral argument OF appellant:
Nelson johnson VS.. Peter Zeichang
appeal from Williamson county. Sub
mitted on briefs and oral argument.
J. e. S. Morris ct al VS.. W. ii. Steven
son error from Williamson. Reset for
May 3.
ID. G. Smith vs. Thomas M. Warren
appeal from Williamson. Submitted on
briefs and oral arguments.
from Fridays Daily.l
Texas g. Pacific railway company vs.
Mary A. Durrrett ct al. appeal from
Dallas county. judgment affirmed.
Opinion by Stayton, j.
/. & G.. N. railroad company VS.. Joe
II. Stewart; error from Travis county.
Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Stay
ton, j.
Pauline T. Sellers ct al. VS.. Anna G.
Nogel ct al. appeal from Comal county.
Reversed and romanded. Opinion by
Stsyton, j.
A. Dreiss ct al. VS.. Wenzel Friedrich;
appeal from BeXar county Reversed
c..
j. w. Fleming VS.. ]. II. Shelton:
error from Tarrant county. Opinion of
commissioners of appeals adopted, and
judgment affirmed with damages.
Charles l.. Tennell VS.. NJ Breed
love; appeal from Travis county.
Opinion of commissioners of appeals
adopted and judgment affirmed.
e. j. Vance, administrator, VS.. Phil
Claiborne: appeal from Bastrop. Opinion
of commissioners of appeals adopted
and judgment reversed and cause re-
manded.
Gatlin's heirs VS.. s. Orgain ct al;
error from Williamson. Opinion of
commissioners of appeals adopted and
JUDGMENT reversed and cause remanded.
Andrew Neill VS.. G. Amman ct al +;
error from Kendall. Opinion of COM
missoners of appeals adopted and writ
of error dismissed by agreement.
Chas. Mullins vs. Tilman Weaver;
appeal from Lampasas. Opinion of
commissioners of appeals adopted and
judgment reversed and cause remanded.
William Rush VS.. w. q. Bishop error
from Karnes. Submitted on briefs of
both parties.
J. NJ. Tucker ct al vs. james A. Ham,
lin appeal from Williamson. Sub
mitled on briefs of both parties.
Tue stale Of Texas VS. Gustave Smith
appeal from Travis. Setto heel of third
assignment.
q. B. Seay ct al VS.. Samuel II. Hill +;
appeal from Williamson. Submitted on
briefs aud oral argument for both parties.
w. G. Wright ct al VS.. T. n. Waul ct
al; appeal from Williamson. Submitted
on briefs of both parties.
III. S. Reeves VS.. j. II. Gholson; ap-
peal from Williamson. Submitted on
briefs for both parties.
G. III and S. A. railroad company VS..
Z. l.. James; appeal from Guadalupe.
Submitted on briefs for both parties.
Leon and H. Blum VS.. J. A. Massenlch
& Co.; appeal from Guadalupe. Set for
to-day.
Guadalupe county vs. Wilson county;
appeal from Wilson. Submitted on
briefs and oral argument for both parties.
Emma Altgelt, executrix, vs. Daniel
Brster; appeal from Bexar. Submitted
on briefs and oral argument for appel
liant and on briefs of appellee.