The Hawaiian gazette., 1882-02-01


rxEcxz N'cCrrz. =
WEpSExRsx, January s. ISL
LRKsrr vs.. Hynan Rros. Action FOR dam
ares. TIE farv re16ereS verdict for TIE defend
ants without retiring. MesSrs- Davidson and pcls
I foe plaintiff; Mr.. Harsven for defendants
THURSDAY. sASrAE1 Is
-rrr, c =. Sl'crI1r AID AUSTIN, =
Jrlirs Maeuin by his next friend S. Msznin. vs..
Z. Furvie. Exceptions 10 TIE ruling q Jndge
NeCniiy, sr<46iniag the demurrer. ArEcsd BY
Mr.. Davidson for The exespsicas and Mr.. Preston
Joe burrows ~ Paaluhi Exreptioas from the
decision Of Mr.. Justice NeCrly sitting as Inter
nedia-y judge. Mr.. Castle for the defendant
6led hrisfs hzd Mr.. FsSeksrtoa for the plaintiff
Submitted tho csss on the decision Of Mr. Justice
McCclly, as he did not think he e,uld hle better
brief.
Astons PelgO ~ Chun Ypn Fan APp-al frOra
the intermediary Court. Argued BY Mr., Hatch
for the plsintiS, and by Mr.. Hartven who also
fled brett for the defendant
In re Bareaaba. deceased. Continusd until
=. Enos rs. Wa Sing. Appeal fron the DECISION
Of the Commissioners Of WAYS and Water. This
case vas partially heard. and adjourned until to
morrow. Mr.. ksulako1 for plaintiff Messrs-
Castle 4 Hstea for defendants
EErDAI. IASvGEI q.
N'cU1Lx. }.
Il. Haekfeld L Co. rs. EnSs1e Bal ct al Molten
Mr. Dole for plaintiffs excepted 10 the roling.
Mr. Bickerton for the defendants
kaxairui * ~ kA,Ezinai ~ Divorce grant
ed Lydia Chapman vs. W. A Chapman Di-
T. 4. Foster VS.. Luaialani. Mosion for new
trial The Court overruled the motion pse foi-H'a,
and NJ. Dole e1crp.eG-
Kalaiokekoi rs. u. Kahsnu. Motion for new
trial The Coart overrGled the motion PrV fssHtG,
and Mr.. Dole excepted.
me Kirr " W N. Gibson The Attorney
General entered Eolis preseqHi.
T. Enos V. Wa sung. Before the full CO1rt IN
Banco. continued frun, Yesterday. After heNring
testimony srd arl-unaents Of counsel, tie Court
decided &c visit the tsczs IN geo tomorrow.
SATURDAY, JASuAEI 3
svpD, c J.. M'cUIII. AUSTIN. IL.
IieaA rs. Psahaa and Others Exceptions to
the ruling OF Nr. Justice MeCully the trial Of
the cause. Argued and submitted.
JUDD. c. J.
J. P. HendoucA kaaiahua. From the 0e.o-
her Term. Judgment ordered for the plaintiff for
the sum Of S1tS-5O and G s..
Louise Bower vs.. ]. II. Black AsSumpslt
verdict for the piSinti1 rendered IN this case,
OF the 18th. the counsel for the defendant M.
Davidson. nOtiuE exceptions thereto and ming
them on the 18th, asking for new trial, on the
following points,
-Ist-Beeause the jury erred in giving YER
dict for the amount Of vNges claimed 6y plaintiff
Ehen L Was proven that no services were rendered
"3d.-Bee-luSe there no sufficient prOot OF a
tender cf services daring each terminal period
during the engagement for which al in.stallu'snt
vas to be paid for services actually and not con
strrctively performed
"Sd.-Because the jury erred in making up
their verdict for salary during the whole period
Of the engacsment a. per contract, when their
verdict shoUld have been l0T damages resultant
FROM 4 breach OF Contract
-4th.-Bscause the verdict Ct the Jury Is for an
excessive amount noe warranted by the evidence
in the case-"
Hin. zee and others Is. Chung Wa. Hearing
SCI for 18th February IN vacation Nessrs- Castle
& Hatch for plaintiffs; Mr.. Hartwell for defend-
ant.
Mahoe vs. Puka ct al Exceptions 70 rulings Of
AR. Justice NeCully. Dir. Dole for exceptions;
Mr.. BIckerton eontrd-
In the tax appeal cstses-the Haiku Sugar Co -
Abraham Fora1nisr: and Stn'l I. Alexander IS.
Abraham Foruander: ard $ y. Castle and j. b.
Anterior vs. G. H. Lacs, we're, BY consent, aP-
pointed for bearing IN vacation
In the case OF I. Euos rs Wa Sing, the Court
having visited the ocs' gao, reserved Its deei-
sion
At ? O'Clock + n the Court adioorned sIas die.
Tie srrr,s sock fGelts white and eolored SAiri.
fast colors iast received per STAR City Of Sydney,
can be seen At the Honolulu Clushiug Emporium
- 4 " MELLIS. IO+ Fort St
Foe perfect 6ttins salt CeEts Or BOysl At Eastern
prices you must cali a. the H9noiuia Cissaiag EnpO-
rfnm ~ An MELLIs lts Fort St