Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1882-04-02
yvEzsrNEss IN TIE RoKGE Family.
se1ne Astounding Revelations by Home
Authorities.

II mi NESS 4 N AZ Il EtCh = r II W ~
se1ne Astounding revelations by Home
Authorities.
The DAILY GLOBE OF last Tuesday morning
contained an ar. Gle written by the Royal
Baking Powder com pany, in which they claim,
as is their knoXu reputation, to the detriment
Of others, that the Royal is the baking pow
der, and that we are young. etc, etc. BY ad-
rertising in this manner they hope to mislead
the Dublt: by stIennousiy avoiding the main
issue. We do not Intend TO be intim dated
nor forced from orr veil sustained position
before the community If the Royal is model
of prrfeetion, Why did they aliO" the follow
ing challenge to pass by unheeded:
First-That the SuO| Flake yields as much,
if not more, carbonc acid gas at IS degrees
Fahrenheit tlrin The Royal.
SacoBd-That the Saow Flake yields more
carh0nic acid gas at 63 degrees Fahrenheit, II
the Royal blr ammonia, as found IN the Royal
by Prof Henry Morton; president Of Stevan's
institute, Hohoken, n. see n. T..
T'r:buze, January 90, 1881. Also, by the
eminent chemists Messrs. Wright & Merrill,
st. Louis
Third-rhat Ammonia, alum, &c m alba, etc,
being considered impurities, sad as stated in
second proposition, that Snow Flake is decid-
edlv purer.
The manner Of testing to bs rs follows;
Each party to eekct chemist known IN the
Northwest; these two 10 select n third The
three to conduct analysis pnb!iely, the eX-
peuses to be paid By the party loslngi the
baking powder to be b0ughs "a any grocer in
S. Paul or Minnnap lis, aud the test tn take
place 10 either city. g. x GRoFF.
Manufacturer Of 5nuw Flake Baking Pow
der.
Time OF acceptance three days, their agent
Being on zoe ground.
ST. Paul. January 81, 1859.
Prot Dodge o. The State university found
uu-on examination that the S Ow Flake was su
perior 10 strength IN the Royal Snd that the
ROYAL CONTAINED ammonia ,au article not found
in the Snow Flake.
Dr. BoArdmen, ST. Paul, fials the Snow flake
4 pure powder, uees it in mis- own family, and
recommen it - others He also finds that
the Royal c0ntaiHs ammonia.
Dr.. A j. Stone recommends the Snow Flake
Is pure.
Dr.. Jones recommends the Snow Flake as
Prof. Weitbrecht fad- the Royal contains
ammos;;s, sud that The Snow FiSke is free
from II.
Dr.. Dedolph finds the Snow Flake q marvel
of perfection and highly recommends it:
The Northwestern Medical Lancet, in its
february puuDer, iOHo " nSe Hh aOio tt' WIZ
from the pen OF ITS editor, condenning am
monIa and endorsing the use of Snow Flake.
In conclusion, we defy the ROYAL TO name
the grocer OF VIII IN DR.. Love purchased the
snow Flake that he tested.
We challenge the statement that ne pur-
chased the baking powder personally.
We believe the Royal bought the Snow Wake
themselves and then furnished 1t 70 DR.. Love.
In that case, his analysis would amount to
nothing.
We shall deal only 10 facts leaving person
siities and insiuuations Tor the Royal.
We claim and can produce our proof that
the Snow Flske is 81 pure and wholesome
powter free from asnmonIa alum and terra
alba &C., While The R0yo1 cannot maze the
SAINT claim.
The agent of the Royal being in st. Paul,
ye shall expect an immediate statement OF
some kind "a answer y. b. dEoFP,
Manufacturer OF Snow Flake Baking Powder.