New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-07-30
INCIDENTS IN LONDON.
Try CABLE TO THE TEIBUNE.l

lBY CABLE TO THE TRIBUNE'l
1oxnov. .July 29.-None of the numerous polt-
ooI dinIomatic or military incidents of the week
To- Modified or delayed the military preparations
for rrovnt. Ministerial opinion nclines to regard
tbe Sul,an's offer to dispatch Turkish troops anu
trab's proposa to surrender as alike made 10 ST.
cnre further time. Mr.. Gladstones repeated deci"-
roons of his willingness to accept the Sultan as
stonce 70 restore order in Egypt creates some ahX
;ctv which is probably groundless. The conditions
Of the landing of the Turks not fully disclosed
Int the Ministry will omit no precautlon 10 Msulc
an efficient control over the Turks when laadeu
Mr. Gladstones references to the Sultan IN Pariia-
1nent are necessarily guarded and poh'e'
bpt nobody entertains more profound dis
ERNST of the Sultan's good faith than
4be whole Ministry All hopes of Frencn-ltallan
oooperation are now Tehnquished' the puohc ho'
much regrettmg the fact. The feeling Is daily grow
inc stranger that England if fighting singe-handed
will he entitled to future predominant influence IN
Egypt.
The Times's articles of Wednesday and Thurs
dov asserting the right and duty of England
10 establish virtual protectorate' haye createo
come excitement. Continental politicians regard
them as inspired. The Anglophobist journals cried
ont that England had showed her hand. Inc storm
raced for day or two and then died away me
1incs certainly did not speak for Mr.. Gladstone
whose disayowal of all selfish purposes In Egypt
was reiterated solemnlY on Thursday lhe r"s''SU
rress gave little support to The I'meSS proposals
thonrh The Standard and other Tory journals had
been arguing in the same direction, but less eA-
plicity-
Tbursday's vote is regarded as showing the almost
comoete collapse of the Lawson Radicals. but seven
ENGLISH Liberals opposing the vote Of credit. Among
them was no important politician. Nh Bnght ad-
bered TO his declaration not to oppose or embarraSs
the Government. He used his influence to diScouI-
noe factlous opposition. The debate as whole ran
stronrlv IN favor of the Government. Sir Charles
Dukes statement Of the diplomatic side of the ques-
tion remained without effective reply, though the
House by no means considers Earl Granville's policy
free from crave faults The Ministerial reasons for
sending no troops to Alexandria hardly passed as
conclusive but on the whole the Opposition showed
ITS sense of the unreality of the debate. C. W. s.
DEFEAT OF THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT.
PARIS Julv 29-In the Chamber OF Deputies to-
day. NJ de Freycnet, proposing the vote of credit
for the protection of the Canal SAID that with
out the mandate of Europe intervention, properly
so called would be neither nor prudent. The
present operation could lead to no conflict with
Europe France would occupy the ends OF the
canal with 900 men, and would show 10 England
that sue possessed the sympathy and moral support
of the French people As Turkey bad announced
an intention of dispatching troops to Egypt tins
was not the moment 10 refuse the grant. Such "A
course would be prejudicial to the interests OF
France in Egypt and to her prestige III the eyes oil
the Mussulman world The Powers were revertmg 10
the idea of collective protection of the canal, and
the Conference was about to consider this phase
of the question. Both France and England would
be disposed TO participate in this collective action
IT, conclusion. NJ de Freyciuet said: 1.-The Govern
ment make a direct appeal TO the confidence OF the
Chamber In this the Ministers are unanimous"
Notwithstanding M de Freycinets appeal the
Chamber by a vote of $50 TO 70, rejected the credl
demanded by the Government.
After the vote the Ministers went TO the Eyse'
and rendered their designations TO President GrevX
He requested them TO continue 20 transact the buSl
ness Of their Offices pending the appointment o
their successors.