Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1882-06-27

the money that day, but called the next day
and got 1t; it was silver money. Said he got
thebracel cts in a box; didn't know what
Darling did with the money, or whether he
made a check or not. In conclusion, he
stated that he only took common, everyday
interest in the case, and on being asked if he
thought approaching deputy-sheriffs with
Jury lists 10 be summoned was only an ordi-
nary interest, said that was about the way he
regarded it.
in the employ of Bohlen, Huse- & g.
then called. He stated that Darling had
made him a present OF shirt-buttons, Gun
L...e-,-eI1d studs; thst ne was doorkeeper OF
the fsmily-cirsIc of the Theater, and that he
ad44litred Darling free after he had made him
the presents.
clerk at g. Lowenstein & Bros, was the next
witness. He was asked if he did not state to
Sam Mcdowell that he and others did not
like Nun finger; that he had been watching
him for two years, and was about to catch
him; and that he (DArling) had been afraid
to go home for several nights for fear of an
attack by Mundinger, all of which he denied.
SAM MCDOWELL,
deputy county trustee, testified that he
knew Darling, and said that Darling did say
what he (Darling) denied, and that he could
give the substance of the conversation; that
he (Darling) said he could send Mundinger
to the penitentiary; that he (McDowelD said
he thought ne could not as they did not have
proof enough; that Darling then said that
they had more proof than he (McDowelI)
thought they had; the place where the con-
versation took place was in the Crystal
Palace Saloon; Colonel Warner and Mr..
Macrae were present.
S. ]. YORK,
formerly a clerk in the employ of 3. Lowen-
slime IL Bros. as statesmen, and also in the
office, was called and testified 10 the gen.
eral system Of bookkeeping and checking of
the firm. -,,,-rxKxryrrE-
Messrs. Rudisill, r. A. Lytle, Rice and
LattiDg, all testified TO the good character of
Mundinger for honesty, etc.
GEORGE W. PRoUDFIT,
cashier for B. Lowenstein & Bros, was re-
called, and explained the system Of checks
and keeping cash.
JOHN A. powell,
deputy -sherif, testified that he had sum-
moned most of the jury in the late Mum
dinger trial; that Sinnott approached him
and asked him if he had summoned the
jury, and handed him let which he (Sin-
nott) asked him to summon; that he Powell
declined to do so, telling Sinnott that it vas
II.
that he Powell had uenire from Judge
Horrigan.
H. p. wooDLoCK,
foreman OF the pressroom of the APPEAL
testified that be had known Sinnott for ten
years; thinks his reputation bad; did not
know whether he would believe him on oath
In case where he was interested or not that
depended on how much he was interested
The jury list was handed him and he identi-
fed 1t as Sinnotts writing; he did not like
Sinnott, but was not unfriendly toward him
until few days ago; he was summoned to
appear as witness in this case; had a con-
versation with Mr.. Lowenstein in the APPEAL
Office last Sunday. Mr.. Lowenstein did not
ask him any hing about handwriting.
NJ. F. vIRGEsoN,
pressman at the APPEAL office, testified that
he knew Sinnott, and knew his handwriting:
his general character was bad he would not
believe him in court of justice on oath; he
wss not friendly; had not been friendly for
some time; he was not his enemy, but was
not friendly to him, just didn't have any use
for him; knew his handwriting, and identified
a paper handed him as being in his writing;
knew Mr.. Lowenstein; had conversation
with him Sunday morning in the counting
room OF the APPEAL; never spoke TO him
before; maybe bowed TO him sometimes;
was told by Robb that Mr.. Lowenstein want
ed to see him; Mr.. Lowenstein did not ask
him about Sinnott's handwriting.
The court then adjourned until $50 O'Clock
this morning.