The Waco daily examiner. [volume] (Waco, Tex.) 187?-1888, 1882-08-13

merit. the consideration which will no
ng at No doubt be- accorded 1t by all who feel
auintcrest IN the matter
Gro Tho EAaiunor)
Waco, August Pas much mmcnt
both boy the ExANSrR and the citizens
hy NJ this city Inns been made OF late touch
being INK the actions Of the city council in
employing attorneys to defend what they
en- at claim to be- vested rights in Mary street
10 ic- and believing that yOur valuable pa /.
per - always open 10 hear any and all /
: ovo sides uf important measures tending to /
- the great and varied interests OF the /
city ask ~ the Mayor, to make brief /
statement Of facts relative to the casc .
nuhis in question On or about the 10th Of .
rated July last the Mayor WIS apprI ached by /
'eltoh Il culurud man, who asked II the city /
it"'' council was going to permit the Texas
and St. Louis railway company to erect /
N to- further switches nu Mary st Get, oppo- |
ed ut site TIA IT depot swltclnnRs, thereby .
monte blockHdiug tine street ~ such u manner /
" tie as to render the pro. erty Of owners on /
md street almost vaiueless. This being |
rivrr the first mtlmation had received Of the |
large matter | remH kcd that the council
her would meet IN session TINT ercming and |
lie of that the Mayor " Md bring 1t
eight NJ before them. When the chair
man Of the street committee
90, ., made his report | asked the council to
1r7,i,, inform mt by what authority the TeX's
,.sstnr ana St. Louis railway com any were
''S'o' building mot tuIv tbair ,iernt huilIuus,
lurch l.; III , ' ,;, , 's,l
IL the 80 IVY '''" .T'I I '',''
r'ices st .'",n' '' ~ ,,"'
Der ~ the council stated that General
CIV" Robertson WIS present to represent the
sony =, citizens on thnt street. and being invited
Irign- ~! we 'u','''i w. "'"h' a'"','lon. VI
n YES - tN,'tU", -, I'm
class wa WI an" H'""T 'n' '""'",nk 1'"lt
L'tts III "'' wv. 'N"H IU' "', i,u"'.
mum 49,! "'"P""' WY "'a ,PW'""E
ou ny '"','i -" '"F.! Ttiro'' p,t"''u
hItI'u ana EI'NS'tih winch, II hlI"w'u
trhin. ~ w ''""'' won d 'f'u"lly r'hu,I
with lno h'ut'H uI mnny l""r rhl2ehH NJ
D.. - moo 'dueloss, he also gave 1t US ms
TE' opinion tnW II Wu7 AN uhh"ihi anu ul,
ma to the ANYWAY S comp ny ny by oriinn"cc,
y up ann chained ,i'"' we s,r uh"@up'G,!
go ON u'l""tt,' y" we "i u' 'l'"o vi " ,i
= the non; non II. elloS,'" l"' '.u..' :" I'M
ridge. Ilh'ue"'"'e "rti"h u" PIH'ehE '"''ti
, ont work on the sw ch, The city
uunp attorney being present, aud full
MS at ~ '"''"fInR IN 'h' "'i''i' i"
bread, .Ap''Sh'" ID! zen h"ooi 'HuIi, ii les"'H
'''''' si9H WI l'P"'" M" ,;' =, /!
70 "tuP''" ny we '."h'ih 'nH''"c'ing 'n'
&. tx. w! nm Hi,"' !" ""I i1I'n,r WIZ WI
lcnur wv NI 5""'u H "hI'' "" Wv r'''"" .ut
unique Mohunl OF l"'7'"! ~, '"J"nui W" "''
ing 10 'l' H,l W. ''l WV 'l'', '''", y,
"urnt "a iIA ,i''' 'l'' mn ~ ,,;,.
IN H. ~" "' "'"''' ''"'H '"Ilho' "''N,' ''l'up
ui the ulhde my "l m amy way, hnNlnH any
lh!ee '"iiN =" 'N"Il HlN.2 'n'I ~,
'n"'hE wy '.""' '", '".n'' ~ i+,Eh't ~ NV
Us .H' CIV" aW'r'. va '"' hohuhE Ioii'T' uH
,,iuMH S ~ " WY "a ''''l''I ", we '"""o'' Az
VIZ one dOi me" Tue r"ul'I on inc hctuu"l me
III, l,,.i I ','' ., -','7 WY """'P",t!
nh, ni"! w. """' '"'''. 'h'S W'Hno" ~,
il Won n,.I,' NY "u "'''"n W ~ w w
on viu "tl; ','' ""' WIZ il''', W '' -. -
ut The. ti,, W., ~! w'I'"'S n ~" "'.'
Dap ton "" I,sI. 'n ''t ="
with % -, WV 'u.ty' Wy VIZ ."'r "
hluour ,.r,,,,, y''' ',,v sum ", ',,'
termination. me motion "hS carr
n-J.,.'t H. -. ,'"' W. ",i'.N I'M AZ
.,IcJ - l ''',''' '',',' '",' AZ
kchey---.- ','' ',,'" h',u ,i
mhlor NIll'ch pI- -, - ~
professional services OF hcssiS fohf.
school I"'' "k'' ""' i'' ~ 1I''
trmher N.I' "' """k, ~ '''i ,"''','
S'',,t tor the sum oil ihire nun ne
SCUM dollars mud all necessary expenses pan
n"ueI by said firm without COLLAR Of inrthc
,,i,,it eNi ehSe I" the CITY. AZ our next regu
"'i''' lar meeting l0it the proposition hr
fore the council, which was accepted
VIZ" four members voting N the nilirH aiy
aud three III the negative. ! uotlte,
Mr. hchcy to proceed with the case
., and the necessary paper, hive bcel
,d' Vie mad" preparatory to trying the cas-,
h'airI at the next regular term Of the district
august court The cnsc regard IN one Of VI
Il lh"-' tai lntcrr-t tu our citizens ns not oul!
Snpf' tins street, but, m fact, oll Of our main
''"'t7- thoroughiarcs are mllntly situated the
hEEl'H city having acquired rights to these
nu ten streets 10y dedication. This special farm
we en- LOT formerly belonged TO Que MT Ham
, tnes' monI vii" SOLD to several citizens ON
h"S ~, Haid Marl street ana III nlI OF nus deeds
i'"t i,' called 10, mary street those VINO pnr'
,.L 49, Ihhstu from MN ana me- successors
~" NV nonSu' tne7' grounds ana mum Their
ia .'li i We t"'t9-eN' uvHvN!IS they Lad Inc
'u syn right 10 Mary street II thus dedication
Don ne has no legal force, ana any person or
mand' corporation u, q will, claim and block
AIDE our streets, then God pity these poor
PEOPLE who have so long been deluded
IA Sev. The city has had entire control of the
V. An. street IN question for several years, i
,loreJ pending several hundred dolinrs, an
srreot now the council propose to see w Muul
'''''' does the title rest. II IN the Guy "