Lexington weekly intelligencer. (Lexington, Mo.) 1871-1887, 1882-04-15
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.
April Term, 1882.
l2ru DaY. ApEIL llTu


G3. Samuel i. Sparks vs.. Nathan Brown
| eje tmeEt
81 samrel y Sparks vs.. Bryson Bowls, eject
! m. Mt
81 Samuel p. Sparks VS.. Herman Peters
cjec'meHt.
Ca6 Martha Jsh VS. James u. lsh ct al, deet
of fi.usi. "!ei;t:.i ami c"rtinued
h1. i.cnry Spannhurst ct al Us. Wernwae
4 Shelby. nOtas
Us james II Barnes Loiama ii. Barnes
divorce; default :ir'i continued.
81. Haiord Gooh vs.. Caroline Good, divorce
orj,r publication
18TH DAY, APRIL I7Tn
divcrcr. served TO April term, lSSi
H. Betty ETomerv Harry Brewer, divorce
default and continued
~ TEos q Graves VS.. Wm. d. Graves, deco
OF iiust
u Mary Il. Wood VS.. slonzo snetiaaer, note
attachment
II. E l. Martin Il Co. vs. BENZ. f. Kile. nc
count, ai,:cht cn:; default and continued
~. Dewitt G Fly vs.. Absaiom Sibert, ut.
tachmen:; default and Continued.
llTli DAY, ArRIL 18TH.
76. J. O. Schrrilerman W.. John =. Schuetz
parturrshn; leave t" defendant to plead in Il
days.
Il. Lohoeiener & Tegler VS.. Herman Keucl
ct al, partnership.
IS. john q. LongslOn Va. james Il. Hord ei
nj, pc iticn in equity.
10 n. }. Isuingarner ct al. vs.. James II
,Chcaiham, ct nj , partition.
SO. Adulph,s L. Calrou ct al, VS.. Nancy H
Cal:op ct n. partition.
81 Gehhart Schuetic ct al vs.. Ernest Stump
enhaus eta!. PARTITION; answer fled.
81. Lawson Lacey VS.. Polly Lacey. divorce;
judgt by default.
lJru DAY, APRIL 18TH.
81. Rachel y. Hanna vs.. Andrew NJ. Hanna.
divorce.
81. John Reid ct al, VS.. Walker and Field,
partition; Leave TO piiiHIii 10 lille account and IL
defendant to wcr.
81. Henry a. Campbell ct al, Va. Geo. T.
Campbell ct al. partition.
Siapp, ct al. pa,tition order Of sale.
81. Stale use of Collector VS.. Ira S. Barnes
faxes; answer filed.
IS. State use Collector VS.. Garland j. Blew
EFT. taxes, answer flied.
50. John L. CaIlison VS.. County Court Laf;l-
yette county, mandamus.
80. Alfred j. Hall, assignee of Donan Il
Reavis, assignment.
81. State use Collector VS.! Mary E. Finch ct
nj taxes; answer iil.d.
81 State use Collie tor VS.. Elizabeth T. s.
I;dbal e. al, taxes; an Yer filed.
9t. state use CollcctL. VS.. Emma l.. Hines ct
al taxes; answer filed.
ct al, from Ray county; taken under a'ivise-
ment.
81. James Robbins VS.. Jennie Robbins,
divorce; default and continued.
18TH DAY, APRIL 20rI.
96. William Bruins ct al, VS.. William Taggart
81. Christian Eek ct al vs. Edward Eek ct
al. partition.
So. . lI6WaN VS.. lkOS. J. Armstrong.
repleyin; default :ii;d continued
80 Bobert Dodd Us Ann Maria Dodd. divorce;
default and continued.
100 Mary Little VS.. William Little, divorce !;
default and continued.
IUl Louisa A. Younger ct al. VS.. Charles Ii .
Younger, ct al. partition.
lOs. j. j. Tale It al, VS. Emile KirchoG ct
al. mortgage: demurrer 10 petition.
I'm DAY, APRIL 2lsT.
1n3. Nancy a. Gregg vs. Isaac S. Gregg
divorce; order Of puiiicatiUn
lGi. j: e. l. Hlrvey,s. Thomas j. Yerby ct
lnce to answer.
los Martin l.. Green ct al, Va. Alfred C.
Green ct al. partitions; alias writ for Mary L.
Green.
log. State use Wright VS. Henry +. Anderson,
ct IA! on b"ni; piainrif gwen % days to file
bond for Costs
lo7. John Il. Howe ct al, vs.. David L. Mi CHI
ell ct al, pnitiiiun
law.
loo Geo. ). Rathbun. DR., TX parte, petition
to praci,crlaw.
no. John Gatron vs. John Harrison, gar
OF w v NICHOLS. garnishmcnt.
III John Catron vs.. Wm. IL Ewing, gar.
oi W. V. Nichols. gnrnishn-nt.
lis John Cairon vs: WIn. T. Hays. gar.
OF w ". Nichols, garni slui,,t.,
1l3. Juhn Catron X. Nj Sparks, gar.
Of w. v. NIcols. garnishncnt.
III. John Catron VS.. john McTadin, gar.
OIL w. V. Nichols. gu: n n!sh.n.n.
lis. John f Hayncr II Co. vs.. VIM. w
Nor;hculi, contract.
ll6 John Z. ;scom, ssisncc of Marks E.
Keller, ass signment.
Ill U. 4. rhetzpg. assignee of August Bet
lis, h. a. Williams, assignee of F. V Ridg-
way; ass gnmrpt.
1l9 a Frank & Sons vs.. Grove Young, gar.
oil IN knipm"yer; garnishncnt
l20 Kramer tG 10th vs.. Grove Young, gar of
W m hhipmeyer; garnishnert.