The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1882-06-03

firsj proposed that Mr.. ingalls, be
elected for o day, bat il was thought
that ;his Nigh. possibly oust The President
pro TEN. II strictly construed. a resolution
was subsequently, olered 90 affirm The de-
sirnation o. Mr.. Ingalls,. but even this Mr.
sherman thought might lead 20 compiler
lions. and his suggestion 10 adjourn until
MONDAY was agreed % as The safest ploce-
lurc under The circumstance. Secretary
sbober presided during the discussion.
TIrE vIEws OF ME-. TUCKEE 0N TIL ACTION OF
THE EEPUmICANr OBJ TIKI HOUSE ~ IL
GARD To TIE ELECTION CASES.
- rlae else is talked 0i here how cx-
celt the ou1ragcs perpetruted In the House
against tbe south hy the Republican,. /
sought NJ. Tucker today and asked his
views ia regard 90 the situation. Ue said:
TIE dendl0cE iu -he MaeLer-Dibale case
arose from tiie cause:
TIE Democrat refused to ob-truci the
decisions in tLe ChalmCre-I yr-'h ease te-
cause tnev conceded The rich O.. DE House
so determine case when heard upo1 ie-I
and v i-auihcuicated testimony. AL Tie
evidence in That case was duly taken and
authenticated.
I'm in Maakcy-Uihtle ca-e there was
sworn statement of forgery IN tbe ,es.l-
mouv. We objected So irving the ease ha-
forcthc evidence Oh which we were o. try
/. was ctlent'catel as genuine. IL g.
ple,utiT cr q defendant % @ cause called
Sop cia OBJECTS because ha alleges thn' o
deposition fled by tlc opposite party Is @
forgery. or has been trmrcrcl wiih hy him.
taat Question is one u.wGv- decided ls rre-
Em'aarv to swearing ue jury ir trial.
That IS
WHAT DEMOCRATS WISHED p0NT
in this casc-nm 60 ute ur the ease ior
trial until % WAS ~c-.ied whether Marbey
had forged the evidence Dee yelled on. The
Republicans insisted on trying rbc ease
upon evidence the authenticity OF which
was 60 bt looked into Wilde trviur e..
This we though, sd wrong. Eence the
deadlock. Tho Republicans then deter
mined 90 adopt I-dc 90 prevent our diia-
tory motions. ~Ly introduced f. and
forced ii through ly tramr ling Oh the rules
iheu in existence
Tie House makes ruies ior its govern
meui 10 the beginning oi the session. Dee
fore conflicts arise. They VIII tnen more
probably be iair, fcr mo- party r.n ioresse
what it may wish % 1e THE rule WHOM
q special case ARISES.
rlI EErrELIcANs TAXI AAoTHia COURSE.
They adou. rules, ard when they found
they cha.e~ ana checked tAel acllan in
Ills ease they changed thcm s. @ disregard
oi all existing rules. u man can chance
law when & checks bic action there i-
really Do law 10 control h.m. 4 party
which changes thc rules ol Che House just
a he time Their restraints are ine1n-
vauieut violates OH PRINCIPLES OF -5oL 1or-
erumeu-
1o1A I--4r1uT GcICZ.
7,,,- ,,i.o, fine ,-,.a v-a. intr,ru.og. Mr.
s...,,,..- of Tr,,r,. moved 20 is- f. or, ff,.
...., r,., .,,..t.,, .,....,.,...i "a. ,-.-.-..-.
e,,- =. ,.5r, l..o..rs. +, ,...s r.i.ta-r mo-
,-,r Tis- vrn. absurd IL rrf.Ir deHv
final rcfion. h,u uss u1l lila,n~T motion.
A motion TO iav ODD the table IS rrgeae1-
ira go dispose finally OF lls rnl,n- cues
uoa GA i.s merits. s d.mory motion rs
ore made o. Gu reference Co tae pending
uuesao,,-not operating upon i.-lor di--
posing Of or amending if-pu, 80 cvade ae-
zion GA Be-.
~-H OUTRAGE os Nu. ruyGrr.
r.rt .ti.i. absurd 5eci-ian was followed i.r
M ,-r.,+sr o-,-.re. Mr.. ~rrfu-er r1Iaealod.
and the speaker refused toalow the House
20 decide whether Dee was ucht or wrong
ia lis derision. Ills decision wa- ihu.
made absolute Jaw ior the Housc 'y Dis own
arbitrary decision licia winch Ae "ou'l
allow 40 appeal ms oesl''ar power rs
stunned by the speaker s'rueA {" bio" al '-'s
liberty O. the people bF oes1o, ins iAl
h'eri! % ineN 'eiies' ''''''' 80 -n 1A'
itoast- Inc ouI"H' was l'io''''~ " -.'.
springer moved lo I'e'''iiil-' .l' -io " '.N
Instructions 4i..s "ls Iui'" ON VI 90 .'.i'
HAG an i-l'i'a''' 30 'iie --' ''s -'-'''''
the speaker
TIL sfAAALh AhAAioAIi.-
The Democrats de1einine1 % afI'a2n
the speaker ior hls defl'olir ru-iies aliof
iAf case Ws dtclueu' I'D ll' -le"n l.'ii'
the ease came mp ior discussion. The case
was briefly This: lnDlte had lDe sen--
AaeEey claimed IL upon ofi l-'siLiona' " men
asked Who wrote J"tH' l1e answer was