The daily gazette., 1882-05-24
SUPERIOR COURT.
Reyb0ld W. Reybold-The Redden CASE
Postponea--Other Matters.


Court opened this morning at 10 O'Clock.
On calling the roll John Rodney, Esq,
counsel for Barney Reybold, defendant m
the case of Anthony Reybold VS.. Barney
Reybold, closed.
Deducting the total amount admitted to
be due from the amount claimed it leaves
only $3S. .22 for which this action was brought.
Chief Justice Comegys charged the jury, re-
hearsing the facts as deduced from the wit
nesses, and told them to decide according to
the weight Of evidence. The jury, after 20
minutes, .deliberation, brought in a verdict
for defendant for the amount claimed and
six cents costs.
Sanders VS.. Black was continued on filing
afIidayits by Mr.. Lore.
Mr.. Bird stated his desire to have the case
of Bellah, ,Quigley & Cows. Peter G. NAPLES,
so as to allow him to leave town. This was
granted and jury empaneled. No defense
being made the Jury found q verdict for the
plaintiff Of S122. .68 and costs.
Bradford and Vandegrift were substituted
for Macallister I'm the case of james II.
Larzellere & Co. VS.. Carr q Smeltz.
Judgment in the case Of WillianiP. Carr's
executrix vs.. Isaac Murray was given by
Mr.. Lore for $513.92. Bird for plaintiff.
Judgment for $4,000 was also given against
Henry +. Robelen and wife In favor of
Emmons and Lore for defendants.
The case of j. H. & A. Keirsted VS.. George
F. Deakyne and wife, garnishee Of w. w.
Hopes was taken up. This was an action
brought upon an attachment fl ia upon
which the sheriff had returned nalld bona.
Mr.. Rodney, the plaintiffs counsel, claimed
| $124 with interest from January 1, 1880, and
produced the records I'm support of his claim.
There being no defense made the jury found
for the plaintiff the sum of $132.SS.
Deputy-Attorne Cooper, having filed his
,laTr. received Judgment against john w.
| Kern In favor of the Sandwich Mandatory
| Company for $13S. No defense made.
The case of Diamond State Iron Company,
d. b. a., VS., Alfred r. Coyle, p. b. r., was
| taken up and jury empaneled Bates and
| Harrington for appellants, Bradford and
Vandegrift for defendant. This was an
action brought by Coyle for the recovery Of
$50, two weeks wages. The company have
posted in and about their works the rules
under which they hire workmen, one of said
rules requiring two weeks notice before
leaving or a forfeiture of wages for thai
time. Coyle claims that he had no notice o
these rules and endeavors to recover his $50
The company claimed that the posting o.
the rules about the shops were sufficient
notice and inasmuch as Coyle failed to give
the required notice therefore he cannot re-
| cover.
The case of Renden, charged with rape
was continued until this afternoon on &C.
counr of the absence of necessary witness
for the defense, who is expected to arrive In
the O'Clock train from Odessa.
Court adjourned until 3 o'clock.
| AFTERNOON SESSION.
Court opened at o'clock and Mr.. Vande
GRIT addressed the jury in the case of the
Diamond State Iron Company VS.. Alfred r
Coyle. Austin Harrington in reply reviewed
the testimony and denied the right of Coyl'
to recover because of his breach of the rules
Mr.. Sharpley says he is not ready in thu
rape case this afternoon and it will, 81