The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1882-12-30
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
NO 81 EQUITY.

~ " ANX I'll
In the Orphans Court of Carroll County :,
ting in Equity. ''
Charles b. Nelson ct. al, VS.. James Mos
Franklin o. Wiles, et al.
The object of this suit is to obtain d.o,..
for the sale of certain piece of land s;tuo.s
in Carroll county, in the State of MarvIoaS
which is part ofthe Real Estate devised l,
the provisions of the last will and testamn.,
of Burgess Nelson, late of said county oaS
State, deceased, unto George W. H. Nelsonu
Charles B. Nelson and Zachariah W ST
Nelson as tenants in common together and !.
their heirs; and for the distribution Of ~
proceeds of the same among those pronerl1
entitled thereto.
The Bill states that by the provisions Of sold
will said devise was not to take effect nns1
the Youngest son of said testator should bava
attainedthe age of twenty-one years; that tbs
Real Estate of said testator not heretofore die
posed of, and embraced in said will, consist,
of parcel of land containing four acres. tbrss
roods and twenty-six punches of land, NOR
or less, of the value of about four hundraS
dollars; that said Zachariah W. S. A. Nelson
is the Youngest child of said testator and has
long since arrived at the age of twenty.one
wears; that George W. II. Nelson, one Of said
devisees, departed this life interstate in Or
about the year 1868, in the city of New o.
leans, in the State of Louisiana, unmarried
and without issue; and that he left SURVIVING
him the following brothers and sisters his onIS
heirs at law to whom his interest in said Real
Estate descended as tenants in common, TO-
wit Charles B. Nelson, John W. Nelson
Emma Buckingham, wife of Eli Buckingham
William B. Nelson, Henry c. Nelson, James
p. Nelson, Matilda Ebaugh, wife of Jesse R
Ebaugh, Zachariah w. S. A. Nelson, Sarah
Martin, wife of George Martin, Eliza WiIes
wife of Henry G. Wiles, (who has since died
intestate, and Milissa Richards, wife of David
Richards, all whom were at the time of his
death adults above the age of twenty.oDe
years; that said Milissa Richards, husband is
dead, and since his death she has married the
said Henry G. Wiles, and the said Miissa
subsequently departed this life in Washington
county, in the State of Maryland, interstate,
leaving Henry G. Wiles, her husband, and chill.
dren heirs at law surviving her; that said
Sarah Martin, wife of George Martin, departed
this life intestate in the year 1868, in Mont.
gomery county, Missouri, leaving her husband,
George Martin, and the following childrenher
only heirs at law surviving her, to-wit: James
Martin, Theodore Martin, George II. Martin.
Peter Martin, John Martin, Sarah V. Martin.
Carrie NJ. Martin and Alice A. Martin, all If
whom reside in said county, in the State Of
| Missouri, and out of the State of Maryland
and that the compliments are not Informed
whether they or any of them are adults or in
fants; that said William B. Nelson died intes-
tate as to his interest therein in the year 1878,
leaving Rachel A. Nelson, his wife, and chill
dren his only heirs at law surviving him; that
said undivided one-third part of said Real
Estate descended to and vested in all the par
ties aforesaid as tenants in common with the
cemplainants, Charles B. Nelson and Zacha.
riah w. S. A. Nelson, who are seized of the
other wo-thirds part of said parcel of land;
that said Real Estate cannot be divided with,
out loss or injury to the parties Interests
| therein, and decree is prayed for a sale Of
the same, and for the distribution of the pro.
ceeds thereof among the parties entitled
! thereto.
| 1t is thereupon adjudged and ordered this
Dist day of December, A. D. 1882, that the
complainants, by causing copy ofthiS order
! to be inserted in some newspaper published
at Carroll county, in the State of Maryland
once week for four successive weeks before
the 26th day Of January, 1888, give notice to
the said absent defendants of the object and
substance of this bill; and warn them to appear
in this Court in person or by solicitor on OIL
before the 10Th day of April next, to answer
the premises and show cause, if any they have
why decree ought not to pass as prayed.
j. OLIVER WADLOW,
Register of Wills.
True copy,-Test:
j. OLIVER WADLOW,
dec 23-5t Register of Wills