The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1882-02-11
Burglars Infesting Neutrality-suspicious.
Death ofan ltalian...The Comp.
trOller's Open Letter.
Outlines OF the Decisions Rendered by
the Supreme Court Yesterdays
Lampasas Locals.
San Antonio ltems...The A. 4 NJ. Direc.
tory In Session. ,
Grand Lodge l. 0. 0. +. AdjOurns Ia
Meet at Austin.
Other Interesting State Items
Galveston,

sulNtstuu.
Special to the Herald, 4
GALVESTON, February l0.-Mayor Fisher
has vetoed the appropriation made by the
city council to assist in detraying the Mardi
Gras expenses His grounds are that the
appropriation is in conflict with the city's
charter.
Mr.. Nidor, of the cotton exchange, having
written the Houston X Texas Central rail.
way as to the amount of cotton which'
would be shipped by that road, Mr.. Il. ID.
True assistant general freight agent, sends
reports from the sixty-live stations Oh the
| line. The estimated shipments from these
points from January 10Th to September lst
is 56,6l0 bales, and the actual sto k on hand
at the date OF the report was 10, 430 bales
| The Brazos is booming Major John w.
| Lovejoy returned last night from the lower
Brazos country and reports the river boom
! ing. Oyster creek has risen fifteen feet and
foot more will flood tie whole country.
At Columbia the water lacks two feet Of be-
ing oyer the banks. The water is reported
as being the highest since the great freshet
of 1852. The river is full of drift and large
quantities of timber, which had been cut In
the bottoms, have been iloated or
SUPREME COURT
Orient Mutual insurance company VS..
| Reymerschopper & Sons; from Galveston
county. Affirmed.
| Adams ct al. VS.. Kerner ct al; from Free.
stone county. Report of the commissioners
of appeals adopted Reversed and re-
formed.
Solinsky VS.. Harris Il Brother; from Or
ange county. Certificate dismissed,
Keller vs.. Hartner; from Jefferson coun-
| ty. Certificate dismissed.
Galveston, Houston & Henderson railroad
company VS.. Allison; from Galveston
briefs granted, both parties consenting; sci
for Monday.
Spencer VS.. Galveston county; from G al
weston county. Set for Monday.
Rantheim VS.. Haltman from Colorado
county Submitted on briefs of both par
ties.
Willis Il Bro. VS.. Rosen6eld; from Col
orado county. Submitted on briefs of botl
parties.
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio
railroad company vs. Lempe; from Colorado
county Submitted on briefs of both par
ties.
A. Nh. Blum vs.. Kahn; from Fayett,
county. Submitted on briefs Of both par
ties.
Russell ct al. VS.. Bennett & CO.; from
Fayette county. Submitted on briefs O.
both parties.
| G. l.. Williams vs. Proetzel; from Fayette
county. Submitted on briefs of appellant
Galveston City company vs.. the city Of
Galveston; from Galveston county. Set for
Saturday, the 18th. ~ tats "
Hodde, administrator, VS.. Susan Hodde
from Austin county Submitted on brief
of both parties.
Gaggan vs.. Williams OF al; from Calves
ton county. Set for Thursday next.
u. B. u. Il C..railway company VS.. .Menard;
from Galveston county. Set for Monday
Goth.
Webster VS.. Mann-et al; from Galveston
comfy. Set for lith.
Wharton Branch vs, Williams; from Gal.
weston county. Submitted ON briefs of both
parties.
Jones Heint vs.. PauPs hers;from Calves.
ton county. Motion to substitute record
and briefs granted both parties consenting.
Franklin, ct al. VS.. Ticrnan; from Calves.
ton county. Motion to dismiss appeal sub.
mi,tcd Referred to commissioners OF ap.
p1ils.
Pool VS.. Widemeyer, Schultz, ct al, from
Galveston county. Submitted on briefs and
oral argument ofboth parties.