New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-12-10
1vuryCTrOys AGAINST THE POLICE.

Several temporary injunctlOns were granted yes
terday by Judge Arnoux, in the superior Court,
restraining the Board of Police from interfering
with the plaintiffs in carrying their business
Sunday The plantiffs-Isaac Marks, milhner,
LOUIS Beck, jeweller, lsadore Fredenburgh, baker,
Simon Grunderhem baker, aud Gustave Rheinaeur,
ieweler-a1e all Hebrews. The complaints Set .or,h
the same facts as those contained IN the complaints
in the suits begun on Friday. The orders to 81 ow
cause why the lnjunctiOns should not be made per-
maneut are returnabe on December 10. Judge Ar
noux said yesterday that he had spoken to David
Dudley Field about the cases, and asked
him whether or not he cared to make
any argument in them. Mr.. Field
did not have any such desire. Judge Arnoux
thought the cases were very important, and that
the interests of all classes of people should he fully
represented III the arguments IN order that they
might lead to some definite and final result. He
referred to the Sunday law IN Illinois, where II had
been decided by the Court OF Appeals that cigar
shops within the purpose OF the statute, cigars
being III no proper sense a necessity Later IN the
day Judge Arnoux granted temporary injunction
against the Board Of Police in favor of
A. r. Samuells of The Metropolitan Alcazar. The
New-YoIk Gas Light Company also obtained tenn
poraTy injunction restraining the police from inter
feri Wi b its workuen to-day, VINO VIII he en-
gagged in putt ng IN connecting pipes between lis
new gas house and the mains III the street. The
connecting pipes cannot l; is SAID, be put IN except
ON sunday because the gas must be SHUT of. 10
10 show cause IN the last three suits ale rcturnable
on Wednesday next,
CORPORATION Counsel Andrews was asked yester-
dav by re- POI ter OF The TRIBUNE what be thought
of the action of Judge ArnOux IN granting tempo
rary njunctiOns restraining the police from inter
ferlug with the business Of certain jewish
shop-keepers on the East side to-day
lie replied Il have not changed my
former opinion. The Code Is very explicit
on this point. 1t does not permit the exposure or
sale Of merchandise OF any description on the sab
bA IA day. The Code does make al exception IN
the case OF serY!ie lIDOr. man who observes
Saturday or any oiIer week day as day OF rest
may perform on sunday any seryIle LABOR that lie
deems necessary, provided he does not interfere
with the comfort aud convenience OF MS uclghboIs
Hebrew who observes the Jewish sabbath may spit
OF saw wood n his backyard. provided he does not
annoy his ueighOOTs. he may wOTk III his factory
pfOy ided the doors and windows are closed AID NJ
does not annoy the community But there Is no
such reservation IN the case of merchandise eN-
posed ior sale, the law EVIDENTLY not hold
Ing this 10 be work o. necessity /
cannot see that any exception can be mace III the
case OF Hebrews long is TIC law remains as IL 10
" Have you presented any further opinion to
the Board OF Ponce concerning Tue enforcement u
tne code p
d" No; ! have seen no reason 70 supplement my
letter Of asst week. The police wall have to be Inc
Judg' Vi what ale works O necessity aud cA"il'y'