Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1882-02-24

judge gave some additional instructions in the
Hawks case. The judge was perfectly sober.
Cross examined-I have never seen the judge
intoxicated
H. l.. GALE.
was sheriff of Renville county in 1881, and
notified the judge to come up to the court
house and give the jury further instructions
in the Hawks case. had some general talk
with the judge, and l had no doubt that he
was sober.
Cross-examined-I have known Cox since
January, 1880, and have never seen Cox in
toxicated to that extent az to interfere with
his business.
On motion of Senator Mcdonald the senate
agreed to have an evening session at s p, N.
MR.. wHALLEY,
an attorney, was present at the Marshall term
of court in 1885, and heard the case of sup
Elementary proceedings, wherein the Cleve-
land Cooperative Stove company was inter-
ested. Judge Cox was perfectly sober in the
afternoon and evening.
Cross examiued-Stu law in st. Paul
and represented st. Paul creditors in the case
referred to, but was not an attorney of record.
took drink with Cox after II O'Clock at
night. l spent six weeks at Marshall, during
which time did not see Cox intoxicated.
MIR. LANGWORTHY.
A commercial traveller, and reside in Mime
apols, and was in the employ of the Empire
Stove company of Milwaukee in 1878, and rep
resented all parties in suit referred to above.
Judge Cox was perfectly sober in the after
noon and evening, and at 915 o'clock p. NJ
went down to the hotel with the judge.
Cross examined-I went from Marshall TO
st. Peter and got the judge to come up. Cox
and spent the afternoon in the office of the
hotel and billiard room, and we took one
drink before supper, and in the evening just
before we retired. l was with Cox all the
time. have known Cox since 1875. | have
seen Cox intoxicated.
A. E. MAS.
A lawyer, and reside at Marshall, and have
known Cox since 1878. saw Cox at the No
vember term of court. Saw him in the after
noon and also after supper on the bridge, in
company with Mr.. Langworthy. / did not
hear Cox threaten to break in the office door.
l was present during the examination and ad-
journed little after 9 O'Clock. Judge Cox
was not intoxicated either in the afternoon or
evening.
Cross examined-This was the first time
ever met Cox, but l have seen him since. Wit
ness defined drunkenness, when a man is
wholly incapable of attending to his business.
l never saw Cox drunk l did not see Cox
drunk on this occasion. Judge Cox showed
no signs in the evening of having been drink
ing.
CHAS ANDREWS.
remember the case of Robinson and Mas,
and the supplementary proceedings therein.
And the same evening | called at his
room at the Exchange hotel, and
was interested. The Judge examined them
and would not grant my request, stating that
my papers should be amended as they were
manifestly incorrect. Which on examination
| found to be correct. This was about II
p. m.
JAMES MORGAN.
l attended June term of Lyon county, lat
Marshal, (1SS1), and saw nothing out of the
way. He was perfectly sober.
Cross-examned-I never have seen Cox
drunk, intoxicated or under the influence of
liquor.
t. E. HoTCHKIss.
A blacksmith at Beaver Falls, and was
chairman of the board of county commls-
sioners at the time of the trial of the
Tower case in June, 1880, which
was fer defalcation of about S1,100.
was present during the entire trial. The
judge was perfectly sober, both day and even
ing. have known Cox since 1869.
s-exahined-Witness said man might
take several drinks of liquor and not be intox-
catej, but when it shows its effects then he is
intoxicated, and when he loses control of either
body or mind, then he is drunk.
MIR, CHAPMAN,
county superintendent of schools of Redwood
county, said he was present during the Tower
case; also in the evening. saw nothing out
of the way and regarded him as perfectly
sober. / know Morrill,, an attorneyat law,
and his reputation in that community for truth
and veracity is bad.
observation-disclosures mentioned about
dozen who SO expressed themselves. have
seen Cox intoxicated, but never drunk, and de-
fined his language in same terms as former
witness.