New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-03-14
THE COURTS.
,opr TESTIMONY BY Mr.. HUMAN.

The whole of Yesterday was occupied III 'n0
.,o.sexaminatiou and redirect examination " -
Ar Human the plaintiff IN the libel SUIT at"'uS 80
ua-e now on trial in the supreme Court ocIo,o -
Van Worst Mr.. Nash or the part o' 'no - 20
FROM, n psmphIet published by Nj binmAn - "a.
that Of Bishop Hare. IN which the n, oo,a
,ho, .u the rumcrs against his character Wh'n 49,.
- o., 1oro R,ssap whppe and Mt "e'su 10"
,-,.oo,ed with n certain Commissioner % linn -,
Mr. Hinman said the Commissioner wac A.. s,.,b
,,ona An ATTEMPT was aiter"aIu maui y - ,,.
NJ Utnnan's counsel. 10 show ny 'Do -.
General Hammond hld heen discharge" o' 'No =
- Gov s,e,,iac and tha; Bishop Hare knew TINS ou'
MN ~, -, W, x.Iled the evidence Mr.. Human
%, the Indians busy along the frontier III
sc,,ring mis- character. General hammond Wne" Nv
c,me 10 the Indian country, declaredN 10 ne hiS 'o
,,n To get rid II the missionaries. The hrst m"h az
,ockea was the Rev Mr. IIiunan his Object Dehg 10 W"
min f,ce hand in carrying his stealings. Inc vi"
meas h nd set his face Ike flint against ali dishonest
,aes and had In that way incurred the ennhy =" "o4
oral Hammond In bis reply - bishop Hare r panP".0
Mr. Human had said that the charge WAde az N'
nv the house mother In regard 20 " the pretty ma
Girl and the other girls he'd been Withdrawn nc "u
MOT can by that that the hous-mother had
the charge but only that II had not been or"au' P
s.ntea On lis trial The witness admitted Hot Duncan
Stone had testified against In ~ rr-a'I y, ,,
i,nng1 he had aied Ia his reply Bishop Hare thSt
Some could not aud wOaiG MOI 20 FSu4!; - 49,
fbart he
nonfd man named Fox 10 act prosecutor a. the
witnesses trial FOys own statement ne kheM
frsf he prosecutor could not lawfully 30 nppoeu 10y
The Bishop but the Bishop ha- usurps the pp%er
Fact that he had not Informed the bisuop nsp
ahout the GLASS 10 be presented 20 nln Tor cor
G,d not seem to the witness mater "a uhhD - :
about" Tie first trial o. the witness neu ny % H.
Hare pad Whipple, was not a Koruna ti'" ."
held sitfings and summoned "ltie5No',
but merely An investigation conducted W uno D'S1oP
NV inourv from az persons who were supposed 10 hn""
N|sb s.Led he wit,ess who the Bishops we're WHO
had told lin that they had not given B!sLop II 20
advice TO proceed against MT Hinindh uP'.h ~, Nv
Eshop Hare had alleged IL his pauphcI .u"' -
acred Mr. Finman replied that they were BISHOPS
Williams Clarksun ard Whpple. lie Hlu Jeu lIa' nc %
heen tried in 1864 for alleged Improper couIct win
81 Indan woman That trial conducted IN Tue same
manner as the rst trial before Bishop Hare anu oIc
"a had been acquitted By TIE eccIeslaSu,AI 'tui
After his acquittal criminal proceeding niu
hegun against him. bur the complaint was uI7'iI~ VI
was related TO us wife ny. marilaSe huu muO I-S
hs1 man lie decl tred thRt the lines between llSh
Cburch and Low Church parties were not so -hArPN
fued now they were some wears atO MN! - -
thu fence Justice an oTst re-
fused 10 ALLOW Mr. Human ~ CLASSIFY me BISHOPS u u
rburch In reference 10 the distinctions OF tlSl anu
MAI Rsbon Hare hal procured his election as BSL'P
nv tufr que M Human sit mat lie lAd uut
tie statement II his attorney that De Mt iiIlI y
Licked two votes 20 MI election He dld hot Know no
many votes had been cast f"r ln lie nAI "a ~
Infans the doctrine stated In MS PainphsS' u"' "
was me only conscience ~ communities.
Mr. smith then reeXamiDed the Wliners VINO e4
mat the property at sautce was That WLlcL
IA bear, obtaihsd by his money, ana money
s.u TO him In individual capacity Dy persons III
ested Ia missionary work. Bisbop Hare hhd poLdt',
will Miss Kiibach for about mUn amer heT ai,S'
corfslon Ia him that sac mad been Inislen b' MI bi
man ana be had nued her sup riuiendent Of Tie
mi on school for about five months.
The trial viii be continued tO-'hy.