Arizona weekly citizen., 1882-10-08
MONDAY, October ,.

Il. B. Cullum vs. W. w. Williams, de- | murrer sustained. Attachment dis missed, and property released and the same ruling and orter ID cases. 4. B. Cullum, assignee vs. W. W. N1- hams and same vs. C. H. Lord, to when ruling and order plaintiff ercepts. | Ten ds We're given 10 amend complaints and a stay of proceedings for same time granted.
 William Sly vs. The Alta Mining and Smelling Company of Arizona and same vs. The Holland Silver Mining Company. Upon motion of plaintiff ! this case was placed upon the law cal euder. Counsel for plaintiff now sug- gests that the sad plaintiff mas since ! the comm anceE.ent of this action de- ! parted this life. Moves that said action ] be continued ln the name of James W. ! Sly and L. II. NOrwoOd, the executors ! of last will and testament of plaintiff, which was granted and sand case or Iered tO be continued as prayed for. The case was heard and submitted % ! the decision Of the Court winch gave | iudgment be entered ln favor of defend ants.
 On motion of James 4. Zabriskie and on pres ntIny hcense from the Su- preme Court of Colorado, II was ordered that upon the taking of the necessary oath 4. NJ. Patterson be admitted tO practice before thls court.
 On motion of J. X. Zabriskie, U. S District Attorney, It was ordered that yeulre be issued for |. $. Grand Jury.
 J. VI. Kirkpatrick Vs. Orion Silver M. Co.,, argument on demurrer continued, submitted and sustained as ta the third count and Cverrulei as to the other counts. Two days given plaintiff to amend.
 Max Ordenstein e. al. vs. W. E. Scott et al., motion argued and submitted.
 Julia A Austin vs. Eliza Jaae Watson, argued and demurrer overruled, eIcep- ton taken and ten days given to an swer.
 C. D. Lane ys. ". Salisbury. De- murrer withdrawn and ten days given defendant tO answer.
 Dana Harmon ys. Hugh White. Same ruling as above.
 \. Derre Ys. O. Blanc ct al. Demur- Ter argued and submitted,
 Gnu Sing vs. F. W. Girgrd et Gl. De murrer withdrawn; same ruling as last.
 An Fol vs Chan Tin W0. Same as last.
 TUESDAY, Oct. 0.
 Chas. Key Ivs. C. Cason, aud James A 5ueu vs. N. McKenna, by consent of counsel in each case the time to answer was shortened ten days.
 Huds1n d Co. vs. Corbett < Corbett. On motion of counsel for plaintiff the case was placed on the calendar. Up- ou presentation of summons, complaint, affidavit of deposit in the post office, proof Of publication default and the submission of the original note and mortgage in evidence, t Is ordered that judgment be entered ID favor of plain tiff.
 Robt. Frazer vs. Refugia Frazer. On motion of colnsel for plaintiff the case was placed OF calendar. For good cause shown 1t was c-der- ed that Arthur Borton be excused as a cridl jurer for the rest of the term Territory Of Arizona vs. IeOdurs Lu- 5az, indicted for an attempt to commit marder Pleaded not guilty of otfencr as charged. Case set for trial Oct. 4, at | ll o'clock a. ID.
 Same vs. Patrick Mahoney, three. in- iictments for robbery. The motion Co qUash the indictment | charging robbery upon one Frank Pc 1 ter-on was 0vsrrule1 and the demurrers l to the other indictments charging rob | b " upon one Mario and one Venture, | were uverrul-d and motiobs to quash | last two indictments were overruled, ! Co all of winch the plaintiff excepted and. with his counsel pleads that be IS not guilty Of offence as charged. Case set for trial Oct. ,, at 10 a. m Same vs. Tim Hurley, indictment for murder Defendant asked for a contin- nance till Oct. fth. which, for good cause was granted C. C. Stephens was added ss associate counsel Same,ys. Manuel Barrios, indictment | for assault to commit murder. This be- inE the day fixed for trial defendant ln- terposed an affidavit for continuance | for two weeks. winch was granted and time for trial set for October 18th, at l 10 a. m.
 Same vs. Eugene Salazar, indictment l for an attempt to commit murder. A continuance for two weeks Was asked l tor and granted, and case set for trial l Oct. 23 !. at ll o'clock a. m. All jurors were excused till Oct. ith, at 10 o'clock a. m. J. NJ. Kirkpatrick vs. Orion Silver Mining Company. The order granting time to amend complaint was vacated and twenty days time given defendants l to answer.
 The Grand Central Mining Company vs Geo. Boyer and Thomas Fitch. By ! consent of counsel order to show cause was continued to next law day. Oscar Bochalett vs. Ainsa. On mo- ! tion of counsel for plaintiff the case was placed on the calendar. Louis Payanes vs. Leonardo and Jose SalaZar. On motion of counsel for plaintiff the case was opened for the l purpose of introducing the location mo- | tice of the Dura Mine; whereupon the ! evidence being closed the case was | again .submitted to the Court for decis- | ion, and the Court beng fully advised | ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff | as prayed for ID the complaint. WEDNESDAY,, Oct. 4th. 1 The Court proceeded to call the trial | calender and the following disposition ! of cases were made: ! United States vs. Dunham, Aaish and
 Driscol, passed.
 Same vs. Wm. E. Multord ct al,
 passed.
 Same vs. J. H. Stout ct al, striken from the calender.
 Same vs. Hil de Armitt ct al, passed. c. D. Poston vs. ". F. Witheren.
 Sixto Garcia vs. W. Ii. Downing. Dolores Gallardo ct al vs. Leopoldo l Carrillo ct al.
 C D. Poston vs. R. F. Wilbur. Ramon Luiia vs. 4. H. Thompson. c. D. Poston vs- Consolidated Ari-
 zons Gold < Silver M. and NJ. Co.
 Same vs. Arivaca NJ and M. Co.
 Same vs. Pedro Aguirre.
 Parker and Clifford vs. Peter Tomey.
 Leopold Carrillo vs. Jesus Navarro,
 passed indiinitely.
 | T. s. Morgan vs. ID. $. Lusk. Marcus katz vs. l.. Zeckendorf. Horace Jones vs. D. G. Sanford.
 Southern Pacific R. k. Co. vs. R. H.
 Paul, ex-oficio tax collector.
 Wm. Zeckendorf vs. Arivaca M. and
 NJ. Co.
 Thos. Griffith vs. Arivacs NJ. and NJ. Co.
 : c. Cason ct fI vs. c. H. Lord ct al.
 Chas. T. Etchells vs. Fl PlOmo Min ing Company, passed to be called Oct 9th.
 Thos. F. Ryan vs. Chas. Hooper. Rogers Brother & Co. vs. W. D. Ten ! ter.
 1 T. E. Solomon vs. Norton & Stewart. Nicholas Sresovich vs Joseph l Sresovich, stricken from the calendar.