The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1882-03-23

In the wrestling match yesterday even
x at the pavilion on the beach, between
ecMahon, champion collar apd-elbow
restler OF the world, and Kennedy, the
,aknown. from Colorado, Mcmahon was
tctorious, by score of out OF 81 Ken
ady having made the first throw.
Nine. EmileDe Arnoud, who arrived in
ne city yesterday from Henderson, on
saving the car. was met by negro who
proposed to carry her basket and show her
The hotel Reaching the corner he broke
and ran with the basket, containing among
other things, her portmannaie. The chief OF
police being notified provided for her imme-
diate necessities, and has detailed detectives
to arrest the thief.
Cotton receipts, 1881 bales. Sales 75C
bales Closed quiet and unchanged.
COMMISSIONERS OF APPEALS.
Winston VS.. Winston; from Brazoria
county. Reversed and remanded.
Indianola railroad company VS.. Frian;
fran Calhoun county. Reversed and dis
missed.
Texas e. New Orleans railway VS.. Sutton;
from Harris county. Reversed and re-
manded.
Russell VS.. King; from Orange county
Affirmed.
Wilbur VS.. Odd Fellows Building and
Exchange company; from Harris county.
Affirmed.
Meeise & Co. VS.. Ginnacchio; from Harri-
son county. Rehearing granted and al
frmed.
Board of trustees of Trinity university VS..
Mcfarland. Motion for rehearing sub
mitted.
James B. Cassidy ct al. VS.. Smith, ad.
ministrator. Transferred to Austin.
The following order of cases were trans
ferred to the supreme court:
Hobby VS.. Cottingham. Transferred to
y Austin.
Houston & Texas Central VS.. Bremond
from Harris county.
n Floyd vs.. Rust, administrator; from
III Wharton county.
u Bond ct al. VS.. Burford; from Jefferson
| county.
Bennett vs. Harrington ct al; from Harris
county.
! CITY of Galveston VS.. S. g. F. Martin;
from Galveston county.
Woodhouse 81 Co. VS.. Kennedy; from
Cameron county.
y Fosteran ct. al VS.. Ellis; from Lavaca
county.
Herndon ct al. vs.. heirs of Kinghendall;
from Harris county.
Friedlander vs. Ehrenworth; from Colo
RADIO county.
Trinity county VS.. Polk county; from
Polk county.
CITY OF Galveston vs. w. s. Posmakinky
from Galveston county.
NC. RE ct al. VS.. McWilliams from
Polk county.
Stell, administrator, VS.. Lewis 81 Dill
worth from Gonzales county.
Smith vs.. Clegg from Galveston county
Whiting VS.. Grass from Colorado county
Eastman VS.. Ward, Dewey d Co.. from
Walker county.
Adjourned for the term.
GALVESTON, March 2l.-L. Williams {
,colored man, was arrested by Police Clerk
Nichols for the theft of apurse from q
French lady Sunday, upon her arrival a
the depot.
The detective detailed to work up the
case in which the establishment OF W. j.
Hughes had been Systematically robbed fol
some time of pistols, etc., arrested VIM
Nelson, employed as drayman, for the
crime. Nelson confessed his guilt and i'm
plicated Jacob johnson, colored, who he
claims was the instigator of the crime
J Both were bound over by the recorded u
|. the criminal court.
r 1t is now thought that Wahledenburg
7 who attempted suicide Sunday, is insane
Cotton receipts to-day 675 bales.
A. 2. TahaI. VS.. city of Galveston; from
A:Galveston county. Reversed:
NJ. Quinn VS.. Houston d Texas Central
from Harris county. Affirmed.
NJ. Creme VS.. Taylor; from Harris cour
y. Report of commissioners Of appeals
edopted and affirmed. -,
Houston & Texas Central VS.. Van Al
styne; from Harris county. Report of com
missioners of appeals adopted. Reversed
hnd renamed.
I Georgia Home Insurance company VS.
Jacobs: from Harris county. Report o
commissioner Of appeals adopted'| Reversed
and Renamed.
lHabby VS.. Cadinham; front Galvesto
ckunty Transferred.
lkust.n WEB ster VI Willes; from Polk
c hnty. Report of commissioners of ap
a a0.I "A odd
tayis W. Chambers; from Galveston
coInty Report OF commissioners OF ap
petls adopted and riiirmed.
Galveston, HOust "a & San Antonio rail
.gay vs.. william son: from Gonzales county
Report ofcouiniissin.e Of appeals adopted
tatman vs.. Ey''enheimer. Transferred
slherick q Rowland VS.. Latimer. Trans
feTed 10 Austin.
scherick & Rowland VS.. Latimer. Trans
fetTed to Tyler.
Texas & Pacific railway company vs.. NJ
Il. O'Donnell. Ordered as above.
Stock vs.. Port; from Lavaca county. Re
Galyeston, Harrisburg q San Antonio
railroad VS.. Mossell; from Harris county
Gaiytston, Houston & San Antonio rail
! road VS.. Murphy; from Harris county. Al
firmed.
, Kirk vs.. Houston Navigation company
Motion 10 substitute papers committed.
Hassey vs. Schlams. Same order a.
above.
Legion VS.. Puryman. Motion TO substi
tute the record granted.
Dun q Holloway VS.. Donlaven ct al. Dis
missed on agreement OF parties.
Austin.
Special 10 the Herald