The daily gazette., 1882-12-19

divided 1t would be so very poor that people
would have to go. to both before they got
what they wanted. Second, the people on
King street have made it what 1t is and their
large business interests should be respected,
and one-half or one-third of their business
not taken away. Third, as soon as you
divide the market you put people to great
Inconvenience in removing It from the bust
ness centre. 7t
c. A. Arnold, No. S1e King street, was
opposed to removal to French street and a
division to Madison.
Welsh, Sharp & Co., No. 314 were op-
posed to removal to French street, for the
reason that King street was the best ior q
market and French unsuited in every way.
They lad no particular objection to a divi-
sion, In favor of Madison street.
Albert Hambright, No. 312, was opposed
to any change and to all division.
Mrs. Parry, $40 King street, was opposed
to CHANGING the market at all.
William Aisentzer, No. 308 King, was
against the removal because he does not
think French street suitable for q market.
He Is not opposed 70 Madison street having
A. L. Calvert, ". & A. r. Tatman and L.
W. Stockley oppose removal, but do not
object TO Madison street getting part of the
market.
Taylor & Fullerton, SO2 King, do not
want any removal or division. Madison
street is too narrow for the market and not
fit street at all.
DIR. J. H. Simms said 'T have no
choice whatever SO far as my interests are
concerned and have declined to sign both
the petition and the remonstrapce. have
these views, however, that 1t would be sense.
less to move TO such a street as French /;
pfa If al q pa hau ha In Tod ON,
King street on account of the market and
to move 1t away would be calamity to
the business interests of the city. do not
think the people would attend the Madison
street market, and think 1t would be as
great a failure as the old Twelfth street
market house, which people living In Bran
dywine walked past to come clear down to
King street. There is another important
matter. understand that the farmers are
opposed to any change. Now, think the
wishes of the farmers should be slightly re-
spected. l know that Is or 20 Brandywine
farmers have been driven from here by our
public spirit toward them, and the change
will injure us even more"
j. Z. Massey, 403 King was in favor of
letting the market remain and did not think
the Madison street market would succeed.
He criticised the bad spirit shown toward
the farmers, and hoped the market would
he allowed to stay on King street.
j. N. Hartman, 4l0 King opposed the
change from King street and said French
street was the most dirty Of all for market
except Fourth. He did not object to part of
the market going to Madison.
A. Ten Weges was opposed to the change
to French street.
j. s. Shoemaker, No. 403 King, gave it as
his unbiased and disinterested opinion that
the proposed move was senselese, but was
in favor of market houses. He did not OBJ
jet to Madison trying the experiment OF
market, but doubted ii 1t would succeed.
Said w. ID. Pickles of Fifth and
KIM: "If l could see any advantage in
French street would not say a word. My
personal interests would not influence me at
all. believe c. G., hald my own In bust
ness despite the market, but French street is
not suited for market and King street is.
1t is the centre for produce and King street
prices are always lowest. think market
on Madison street would rather be an ad-
vantage, and / favor it. If 1t succeeds shall
be glad, indeed"
Isaac Dillin, No. 407 King, is opposed to
any change or division.
w. T. Hickman, No. Ali King street
wants no change to French street, but is in
favor of Madison street market.
w. s. Heisler, No. AIS King is against q
change to French street, but not opposed to
Madison.
Councilman A. A. Eastburn In his stall at
No. 410 King declined to make any state
ment, butt Is known to be In favor of King
street. "You will find out how i stand
next Thursday night" said he.
w. II. Carr, No. 42l and s. N. Smeltz,
No. 423 King, are in favor of King and
Madison.
Joseph Lloyd, Fifth and King streets, is
opposed to French street, because 1t is unfit
for market. He has no objection to an
additional market on Madison street.
s. F. Ware, Fifth and King, wants the
market to remain on King street, but does
not object to Madison.
l. II. Frank. No. 503 King, is emphati-
cally down on change to French street
He has signed against Madison street, but
had an idea 1t would get part of the market.
j. X. E. Montgomery, sos King deemed
the effort to move the market TO French
street and outrage. He had heard a lead
ing property owner In west Wilmington says
the Councilman who voted for the ordinance
was either fool or had been bought. He
favored market houses after two or three.
years. French street would be horrible for
market owing to the dust. He did not
oppose the market ON Madison street.
j. II. Fulton, No. 5O7 King was opposed
10 DOLH ffGHCu NIdutbO1 bIFbBJ5.
A. Richardson, No. 500 King wanted the
market to stay where it is. ''Let them have
a market on Madison street, too" he said,
sit won't amount to anything anyhow"
Handy d Rubio, 51l King wanted all the
market to remain on King street.
DIR. j. X. Brown, No. sos King street,
was in favor of having the market ON King
street. He did not find that the market
people made the street unpleasant to live in
at all. The idea of French street with all
its dust was ridiculous There would be
great danger of accidents from the Dela-
ware truck and Washington engine. The
market then would disturb the children In
No. school.
James -dorrow Of James Morrow & Sons,
who lives at No. $40 King, would like to
have the market moved, and Is in favor of it
going on Fourth street.
''Wopldn't Fourth street be too dusty I"
asked the reporter. EE5
~ think mot. If it was they could
pave it,"
a. f. White, No. 900 King, wants the
market to remaip ON King street.
c. W. Horn, No. COZ King wanted no
change made.
Councilman David Stevenson, No. 604
King, did not desire to have the market
taken off King street.
John Bruce, No. 612 King, did not think
1t any use to move. In his opinion French
street is too dirty. Market houses should
be built,
Ia. Wilson, No. 616 King, was in favor
OF keeping the market on King street, and
raised no objection to part of it going on
Madison street.
John Eising, No. 6ls King, had signed
4