Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1882-11-21
SUPREME COURT.
IN RANK.

| MONDAY, November 20, 1882
Court convened in November session at O'Clock
PM. Present-Morrison, C. j., presiding; McKins.
tTy j.; Myrck, j.; Sharpstein, j.; Ross, j.; Gross
10,652-Peoplevs, Hamilton-0 On motion of George
for appellant, ordered that this cause be heard by
the Court in bank on Monday, November 81, 1882,
| at o'clock A. N.
| 6ss- Heurickson Vs. Smith--Motion OF Young
for respondent to place cause on calendar denied
s,6s7-Walford ct al vs.. Lyon C. NJ Co.-Motion
OF Belcher to continue cause for the session SUBJ
| mitted
s,6s3-People VS.. Rigney-on motion of Bates to
pla,'e cause on calendar, ordered that motion be
gran;d ard that be set for hearing on Thurs
day mo-iing, November %, 1882, before the Court
in bank.
se63-Peopfes Savings Bank vs. Hodgson-Mo
ton of Bates - place cause calendar submitted
s,375-Cross We Zellerback ct al, and s csc, Gross
vs.. Zeerback ct al. On motion of Reardon for re-
spondent, ordered that these causes be continued
to be heard in San Francisco upon some day in De.
cember next to be hereafter determined upon.
People ex REL, etc, Vs. Harrington Motion Of
George for respondent TO place cause on calendar
denied.
l0,7sS-People VS.. Soto Motion of Attorney
General to strike record herein from the files said
motion to be argued in San Francisco submitted
lO,77s-People vs. Brand-Cause continued for
the session.
10,7s1-People vs. Jordan-same order.
l0,ls9-People vs. Fong All Sng-Same order.
10, 790-People VS.. Jordan-Same order
10,746-People We. Mitchell Argued by Lusk for
appellant and submitted.
o,7S3- People va. Shcttland-Argued by Attorney
General Hart for the people, and error appearing
in the transcript, it is ordered that the Judgment
herein be and the same Is hereby affirmed.
10,795-People vs. Garcia-Argued by Attorney
General Hart for the people, and there being no ap
pearanee for appellant, and no points and autheri-
ties on file and there appearing to be no error in the
transcript 1t is ordered that the judgment and or
ders herein be and the same hereby affirmed
People Vs. Tsmkin-On motion of Cross and by
consent ordered that be submitted as of this
date upon the points aud authorities on file herein
Glass Of Applicants The following class of appli-
cants for admission practice were examined as to
their knowledge and learning in the law by McRins.
try, j.: August N. Buchanan, Endorsed by A. c.
Freeman, George E. Bates and j. H. McKune
Chauncy Fl. Dunn, Endorsed by A. c. Freeman and
Elwood Bruner; Robert Bell Tappan, indorsed BY ].
w. Clark, w. b. G. Clement and A. p Van Duzer
Selm NJ. franklin, Endorsed by Charles E. Wilson
and George E. Othis; Edward L. Rhodes ndorsed
by W. I. Wallace and John CARRIER; Nicholas Bow
den, Endorsed by L. Archer and VIM. NJ Lowell:
Sheldon A. Aorford. Endorsed by A. Campbell, Sr
and Char,es n: Fox; E. J. Figg, Endorsed by A. L.
Hart, J. Il. Mckune and A. P. CatIin and upon
sufficient examination the following applicants were
admitted to practice attorneys and counseors at
law in all of the Courts Of this State Chauucy ~.
don A. Morford
Adjourned until Friday November "a, 1882, at
10 A. NJ.
To-DAY's CALENDAR.
Court meets at DAN
DEPARTMENT ONE
S,433-Butte County VS.. Boydsten ct al.
S,i65-Cox VS.. Hayes
S,5s3-Moran Abbey ct al
s,5si-Gridey vs. Boggs ct al
DEPARTMENT TWO.
s.6S9-carney ct al. VS.. Arizona Gold Miniog
s,47s-Cornell va Corbin ct al.
S,395-Dean VS.. Walkenhorst ct al