The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1882-03-16
COURT DECISIONS.
synopsis of Opinions of Commissioners of
Appeals.

Appeals
TIP. Williams VS.. b. w. Robinson; APP
peal from - county. II was proper for
the district court to determine the issues
between the parties and to direct in legal
way its classification and payment ia due
course of administration, but it is conceived
that when the district court did determine
such rights that it then exhausted all its
rights and powers over the subject and
any decree it might make whereby direc-
ton was sought TO be given to the probate
court in the mode of adjusting preferences
and priorities as TO debts Of creditors not
before the district court, and of limiia-
lions and exemptions and of homestead
rights affecting persons not before that
court would not be binding upon such nom
litigating parties, and would be an invasion
of the prerogatiyes and jurisdiction OF the
probate court. Affirmed. Walker, y.
John Il. Peel vs. Frederick Schofield; APP
peal from county. The judges sig
nature is absolutely necessary 60 the valid
ity of a statement Of facts, and without
such signature the supreme court will not
notice Il, although the attorneys OF both
parties agree TO il as correct and In writing
waive the omission Of the judges signature
and request the supreme court 10 act upon
il. Affirmed. Walker, y. ].
J. ID. Brown vs.. i. W. Causey; appeal
from - county. The necessity OF con-
testing facts which warrant discharge i'm
every court in which The discharge may BE-
pleaded Is a hardship never intended
10 be imposed upon The bankrupt. and
on ordinary principles Of jurisprudence
that nothing but the piaincst terms d the
statute can Justify such construction. \
bankrupt can plead his discharge in bar 81
en- action AGAINST him by q creditor whose
debt hnl not been scheduled, ard who bad
not been served vith notice l-1m tle bank
rupr court. Affirmed. Walker. p. j.
j. W. ID. Chalk % o. vs. Foster a Messing;
error FROM Harris county. 10 thc dC7lrp-
ton given in fh1 deeds -ls sufficient
means f0r G9ter-ainins and iieltirInr tle
prem aes 90 be- conveyed. Tire conveyance D.
ralif: or the true location oi tLe land may
be- rendered certain bv reference ~ other
c1uvevnncls made in TIE deeL Aa-rmel.
Watts. J.
ME 5itv or Indianola vs.. the q. " q.
& T.. railway company: nrr,eai from Ccl-
houu county. The consolidation ul ore
company with nnoihcr lenders the c1rsI-'-
fatef company liable flr Cd valid contracts
AMI liabilities 81 the tw0 C1mVauies thus
r.--ierli lnfel. Do D. iufErnfle rom the stat
Ute that q city has tie right o. ccntEa1i
with a railroad COMPANY in re--ard o. ilart Z
lar streets b. nc occupied. streets are ri.ir
f.r1r.erf-. ani n1iuith-an1ilE TIE TCrs
eouferrsl on tie city ruthirifies. ftfF re-
main 0ub.ic The LEGISLATURE might en-
thrriEs tlri- nee Al rli.rual bed W.tl1lt
COMPENSATION to the ctr. Revere end
rernrufel. Maf's
81. a. VEN an|1 e ni. Vel. WI. Hl'ctirs
q el Arre-l fram N1.rral1 county lie
crr-t halrr cl1rrei fle iCrT tlaf treT
11irtt rras-llf q carl iflie rrc1Is--r
. nd he zee -rrIl fns' u tirrr t- q lrE .lr-
ras rntrr III srfl
No. r RI iarr~rcH = rr.1rr cd H-
1IafH1 p rarrlrr. Il.f i1ri7 rnl.
rt-fr tts r.-aal-Ir. 'rr sHH1iI e.
IT, srrra H11ErrHr RI o. trlrr rf
e. - tufrtT rrrrs vii r'r rr-
- Fti1r q il-1i 1fa Cl-Il--i,- f---l'