National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1882-03-28
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

A decision was rendered by the Supreme Court Of
case V Of The township Of New Buaio pPnt RP' In
error vs. The Cambria Iron Company. In error TO
District OF Michigan. This was q suit upon certain
bonds issued by the township q New BniIalo IS a
Railroad Company the LIST of June, 1862 1t is con
IeSdef ~ Se II srTS eh ha s by S settled
issued they were void.
in Taylor vs. The city Of YpsaHt that blythe law Of
Michigan, US expounded by Its Supreme Court and
menis pPoP to the dsctso In People VS. saem
bonds issued in conformity with the act Of March %
whom they were issued. -
it's further conended by the plaintiff In error that
the rights and obligations OF the parties are to be de-
termlned by the lay as eXnogSnded by the supreme
in fiict received the bonds,
The Court holds that this defense also is untenable
il we're not Il is entitled to whatever rights The rail-.
road Company had by virtue of Its contract with the
formed before the decision in People VS. Salem was
rendered and was NOT affected by the decision in that
The court further hos that the fact that the bonds
were issued as donation md not Subscription is
not affected by their delivery to consolidated
%SsS 70 n me Of Rg
Court Is affirmed; Opinion by Justice hSr,Sna: ;,,r.s
No p Samuel r. u MATHEWS ct w S
S The SSslo Of the uned pSs MPBea
Massachusetts Decree affirmed, with costs. opin.
No go. Wesley b. Bonn iiield plaintiff in error va
George i. Price, In error to the Supreme Court OF
Wyoming. Dismissed, with costs, on the authority
of HeCht VS.. Boughton, No, 9l2 October term 1881
Opinion by ChiefJustice Waite
No 1921. Cyrus Nickerson ct AL, appellants vs. Tho
Merchants Steamship Company of Charleston, s. q.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States
for the district of Maryland. Decree affirmed with
No ia. stephen Bird etal., executors, DC, plain
tlns in error w. The Louisiana State Bank In error
10 the Circuit Court of the United States for the dis
trlct Of Louisiana. judgments affirmed with costs
by divided court,
No ll25 Benjamin U. Keyser ct AL appellants, vs.
Henry II. Farr ct al Motion TO disiniss so far us II
IL predicaed upon the order of the court below va
eating its allowance of the appeal, denied. Other
questions postponed to The hearing on the merits
No. 40 ii. J.. Whesde, appellant, vs.. j. G, Hasel-
ton ct al. Motion to dismiss Submitted.
ANo 6Sl. The Commonwealth of Virginia and The
Board Of Public Works of Virginia. appellants vs.
William B. duncan and 3, L. NJ, Barlow, trustees ct
al, Dismissed per stipulation,
No. l2lb M, Gray ct al, plaintiffs In error va Ed
ward Field ct al. In error TO the Supreme Court OF
Arizona. Docketed and dismissed, with costs
No. 245. Asa Johnson ct al, appellants, va The
Flushing and Northside Railroad Company. Argu-
ment concluded.
No Dag Albert schefIer ct AL executors. &C. plain
tins In error w The Washington City, Virginia Mid
land, ana Great Southern Railway Company. Ar
No 2i7 The Board of County Commissioners OF
Pueblo County, plaintiff In error, vs. William II.
No 2i9 Augustus Il. Post plaintiff In error vs. the
Board OF supervisors OF Kendall County. Passed
No. %i5. The Amoskeag National Bank, plaintiff In
error, VS.. The Town OF Ottawa. Passed.
No 30 y. 4. Hitchcock, plaintiff in error vs.
William c. Buchanan ct al. Submitted.
Adjourned until Tuesday.