The Salt Lake herald. [volume] (Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1870-1909, 1882-09-12
T"ELEGRAPHIC NEWS.
THE STAR ROUTES.
Mfuer and RPFGeIl Guilty,
Turner and Peck Innocent,
aad H Disagreement as
TO the Others.

Sunday according % me correct recOTI
vet the true character Of the day was il
dicsted by the we'll dressed and lare
crowd that filled the trial room long bt
fore the opening Of the court. With III
exception Of Dorsey Rll the de,esdan'
where present. Promptly 81 ten Ii
court was called to order. In answer {
Judge Hyle, the deputy marshal sci
the jury vas not ready 10 come in and Oh
caurt remarked that he presumed ths
the jury had over slept themselves. a
twelve minutes past ten, the jury entere
looking rather fatikued. In answer t
the usual question. The foreman answered
I am not az yet directed by tie jury
make a report.
The Courb-You have not agreed upo
3 verdict?
Foreman Dickson, partially.
Court do not know but that 1 shall
have to administer the common law il
It's severity. At common law the jury
may be locked upand kept together with.
ogt light, FIRE or any OF the comforts O.
| civilized society, and 50 kept till tbeiI
verdict is reached. l will consider
about it, but will not adopt that course
to-day.
JeFeman Dickson-Tt might be proper
to state that we are M nearer 8 conclu-
sion than when our last report was
made.
The Cours-Then, gentlemen, the
time has come TO enforce the common
law. Marshal, you wilt take the jury to
their own room and detain them, as other
juries are detained, till q verdict is
reached. The jury fled cut, AMI the
court took a recess until 2. At that
hour the usual audience was assembled.
1t included one lady who sat by the side
Of j. w. Dorsey. j. W. Dorsey was
present for the first time since the retire
ment of the jury, but left the room before
the court was called 10 order. All ether
defendants we're in the room except
Brady, who remained 10 the corridor.
The deputy marshal, by direction Of the
court visited the jury, and soon made 8
report that the jury stated If the court
had anything to say they would come
down, otherwise nct. The court had
nothing to say to them, and announced
q recess till 10 On Monday.
Washington, 1l.-At TO- 10 the Jury en-
tered the court room, and through their
foreman reported to the court that they
hEd reached a conclusion as to four of
the defendants, but stood as on Saturday
rs to the others, bsing unable to agree as
TO them. the court declined to receive
the verdict, and took q recess until 2
.. m.
That public curiosity in the result of
the star route trial has not abate3 was
manifested by the large crowd which
throDgen the court room this morning.
Miner, Reredeil, Turner, VAile and j.
W. Dorsey were in attendance, and the
judge having taken his seat, the session
of Friday closed aud the session o! Mon
day was entered upon. The jury en-
tered, looking fstigued and generally |
worn out. In answer TO a question by
the clerk whether they had agreed upon
8 verdict, Foreman Dickson said; "Tbe
Jury stands the same as it did when the
was made Gu Saturday.
Isst, decided as to feur Of the defendants
and unable to agree as to the others.
Ingersoll requested the CouTttO enquire
Rbether there was any prospect OF the
ury reaching a conclusion.
This the Court refused 10 do, stating
hat it wss . matter about which the
ury might differ. He was not willing to
discharge them yet. lie was unwillingto
the barbsrism of the Law by stsrv-
DR the jury. They could have wster TO
food to eat and 3 place to rest.
FOremsn Dickins0n.-The jury have
ust requested me, il proper to present
my personal views, as to their
agreement,
The Court.-The Court cannot receive
t. Ifthejury are still in darkness as TO
question Of law the Court will with
try to enlighten them.
foreman DicksOn-We have fully dis
every point presented By yOCr
honor ss TO the law Of conspiracy and the
acts presented by the evidence.
juror McNsllY-I am firm in my IN
and nothing can alter il.
The Court-None of you are author |
.Zed 10 make g statement now. After
discussion comes elaboration. You
discussed the whole Gaze | have no
doubt; you have been celebrating, but
you have not reached q conclusion 81 to
he whole case. It is in the power of the |
court 20 accept such q verdict as you are
prepared 10 render low, but the import
ance OF the issue, the great amount OF |
sud money and time and care ex-
in the triSl of this case, renders
il very important that, If possible, you
should render a complete verdict as to
the whole Of the defendants. l don't wish
to give you binding Instructions even as
to that. I will try you once more.
Foreman Dickson, Tesignedly We
obey with respectful submission to the
court.
The court said be did BOT wish to
be understood By his last remark as
promising 20 discharge the jury at 2I
At2:05 the jury entered, and though
the foreman reported they were unable
to sgree, the Court stated tina. it hkd
come to the conclusion to accept a par
!isl verdict The roll of the defendants
was called and all answered here"
The jury then rendered 8 verdiut of &C.
SIS to Turner and Peck, AID guilty
as TO Miner and Rsrdell. As 70 the
they were unable to sgFee.
On objection tneTFLck that Pee had
not been e-Ta!gned sn6 cosseCusntIy
could not Oe I1ciCde0 u the ver6lct. he
repeGtec the report So 20 ;he
otnscs, Bat left out tie name OF Peck
The jury we're :bsn discharged, anT
Gnd Williams, for LileF sn6
2eedell, respectively, moved &lY ares, Of
Judgment and FOR Z new cri6l.
after 81 angry passage DstWe ser In
gersoll and GeTricF, and eErcess t.g.a-
nents or both si6ss intent &c prove TIE
attempt st bribery % -he bot
tom The court adjourned until Wednes-
dAy, when arguments OF the motion n
Judgment VIII be heard. One of