Sacramento daily record-union., 1882-01-28
DELINQUENT TAX LIST.

for tax on improvements State and county tax,
81 So costs, 81 cents total and costs, So H.
No 32IO-A Against E. F. Howard and east 80 feet
Of lot g. and d, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Streets
in the city of Sacramento, for tax on improvements
State and county tax, 81 SO; costs, 62 cnts total
tax and costs. 50 IL.
No. s2I2-Against W. E. Burnsides and personal
property State and county tax, 81 70; costs, 5S
cents; total tax ard costs, 81 2S
No 32l3-Against J. X. Hall and the east half OF
ot Z and G. Thirteenth and Fourteenth streets,
in the city of Sacr mento, and improvements state
and county tax, 81 10; costs, 5S cents; total tax
and costs, g 2S.
feet and north so feet of lot s. and l., First and
and county tax STA 90; costs, 81 u; total tax and
costs, sl52 p.
Branch:
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO, May IA, 1881 I
To Joseph W. Houston, Assessor OF Sacramento
couuty-Sir The State Board OF Equalization, on
the I'd day OF May, 1851 assessed for the year 1851
the Amador Branch Railroad Company for its fran
chise roadway roadbed, rails and rolling stock in
the State Of California in the aggregate sum of
1915 400. The entire length OF the main track OF
railway OF said company Ill SAID state is twenty
seven miles The length OF he main track OF said
railway in Sacramento county is pineteen miles
The description of the whole of the main track OF
the railway Of the said AmadOr Railway Company,
and the right of way for the said railway In the
the town of Gait, and thence running in general
easterly direction to the west line OF Aulador couGty
at point nearly betN cen townships and Dorth,
in range east, Mt. D!ablo base and meridian the
ass ssed value pr mile of said railway, fixed bv
pro rata distribution per mile of the assessed value
of the whole franchise roadway, rold5ed, rails and
rolling-stcck Of such railway of the seid moany
within this State is $40, 200 the apportonm, Mt Of
the assessment of said franchise roadway, roadbed,
rails and rolling stock by this Board for and To Sac
ramento county is Sl93. 500 State and county tax,
50 294 so. WARREN DUTroN, Chairman.
JAMES L. KING,
NJ NJ. DREW,
d. NJ. KE>FIELD,
T. ID. HEISKELI,
State Board OF Equalization.
E. W. MAsLrN, Clerk.
Costs Sl65 20; total tax and costs, So 459 so.
| No. 366-Against railroad company, California
Pacific.
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO, May "A, 1881.
| To Joseph W Houston, Assessor of Sacramento
7 fcounty-Sir: The state Board of Equalization on
the I'd day of May 1881 assessed for the year 1881
the California Pacific Railroad Company for its fran.
chise, roadway rosdbed, rails and rolling stock 10
the S'ate of California in the aggre gate of ST.
$50 250 The entire length of main track of railway
| OF the said company IN the said ate is 1l2 80
miles. The length of main track of railway OF said
| company in Sacramento county il so miles The
description of the whole % the main track of the
railway OF the said California Pacific Railroad Com
| pany, and the ght of way for the same in the
| county of Sacramento is as follows: Beginning at
the center OF the free bridge spanning the Sacra-
mento river, between Sacramento and Washington
thence along the bridge easterly the city Sac
ramento; thence to the depot in said city The
assessed value per mile of the s'id railway fixed
by pro rata distribution per mile of the assessed
value of the whole franchise, roadway roadbed rails
and rolling stock of such railway of the said COM
| pany within this State is Sl6,500 The apporton-
ment of the assessment OF said franchise roadway,
roadbed rails and rolling stock by this Board for
20 Co. 40 yttr 10 Gfafa ar,d
| county tax $40 s5
WARREN DUTToN, Chairman,
JAMES L. KING,
NJ. NJ. DREW,
D. NJ. KENFIELD,
| I. d. HE>KELL,
State Board of Equalization.
E. W. MAsLIS, Clerk.
Costs 81 81; total tax and costs, s147 rs.
! No. 3l67-Against railroad company, Central
Pacific.
OFFICE OF TILE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
| SACRAMENTO, May a. 1881.
! To Joseph W Houston, Assessor of Sacramento
county-Sir: Toe State Board OF Equalization on
the 2d day OF May 1884, assessed for the year 1881
the Central Pacific Rsilroad Company for its fran
| chise, roadway roadbed raj and rolling stock in
the State of California in the aggregate of S15
| 055, 500, The entire length OF the main track of
railway of said company in said State is Coz %
miles. The length Of main track of said railway in
| Sacramento county is Il miles. The description of
the whole of tie railway OF the said Central Pacific
| in the county of Sacramento is follows: Begin
ming at Dry creek, the boundary line between the
| sad county and San joaquin county, near Gait,
thence through Gait northery to near and east of
the city of Sacramento also from the city of Sacra-
mento north and ea.terly TO the dividing line
| between Placer and Sacrau ento counties, near
Antelope The assessed value per mile of said rail
way, as fixed by pro rata distribution per mile of
the assessed value of the whole franchise, roadway
roadbed, rails and rolling stock of said company
within this State is $4,000. The apportonment of
the assessment of the said franchise, roadway, road
bed rails aud rolling stock by this Board for and
to Sacramento county is 81 OPS, 600. State and
''N-'''' ''' ' WARREN DUTToN, Chairman.
JAMES l.. KING,
NJ. N. DREW,
d. NJ. KENtIEtD,
T. d. HElSKELL,
State Board Of Equalization.
E.w MAsLrN, Clerk.
Costs, Ss7l rs special school tax Victory Dis
trct, STA GS; costs, 50 20 total tax and costs,
SIS $50 03.
No. Sl6s- Against railroad company, sacra-
mento aud Placervlle.
OFFICE or THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
SACRAMENTO, May IA, 1881.
To JOS W. Houston, Assessor OF Sacramento
county-Sir: The State Board of Equalization on
the I'd day of May 1881 assessed for the year 1881
the Sacramento and Placerville Railroad Company
for its franchise roadway road bed rails and rolling
stock in the State of California in the aggregate
sum of s4S5,o4s The entire length of the main
track OF railway of said company in the said State is
As so miles, The length OF the main tack of the
said railway in Sacramento county is 20 70 miles
The description of the whole Of the main track of
the railway of the said Sacramento and Placervile
Railroad Company, and the right of way for the
in the county OF Sacramento, is as follows !:
Beginning at point Front street, at the foot of
street, in Sacramento city; thence south Front
street to r street thence easterly X street
to the east line of the city; thence continuing
in the same general direction to Folsom, thence in
a southeasterly direction about eight miles to the
dividing line between Sacramento and Ell Dorado
counties at the east line OF township north,
range east, Mount Diablo base and meridian. The
assessed value per mile of said railway, fixed ty
pro rata distribution per mile OF the assessed value
OF the whole franchise, roadway, roadbed, rails and
rolling stock of such railway of said company with
in this State, is Sl0,0ol The apportonment OF the
assessment of said franchise, roadway roadbed rails
and rolling stock by this Board, for and to Sacra
mento county, is S297, 500. State and county tax,
S5,057 &c.
WARREN DUTTON, Chairman,
JAMES L. KING,
NJ NJ. DREW,
b. NJ. KENFIELD,
I. D. HEISkELL,
State Board of Equalization
E. W. MAsLIN Clerk.
Costs, s253 40 special school tax, Capital Dis
trict si7 Is COSTS 81 35 Granite District, 1924 20
costs GIG 20 ; total tax and costs, $500 80.
Unknown Owners in City of sacra-
mentO.
No. Against lots / and 2, A and B, Tenth and
Eleventh streets. State and county tax, 6S cents
costs, SO cents total tax and costs, 81 q.
No Against lot 7, C and D, Fourteenth and
Fifteenth streets State and county tax, 81 cents;
costs 81 cents total tax and COSTS 59A cents.
No Against south half lot s, II and |, Fifth
and Sixth streets. State and county tax, s. cents
costs, "a cents; j; total tax and costs, 81 80.
No. Against north half lot 1 and all of lots 2
and 8, P and Q, Fifth and Sixth streets. State and
county tax, 50 so costs, 81 cents; total tax and
COSTS 81 Ga.
No against south % feet lot s. and Q, Fifth
and Sixth streets. State and county tax, 50 55
costs 62 cents total tax and costs, So II.
No 6-Against west half lot 6, and Q, Fifth and
Sixth streets State and county tax, 81 55 COSTS,
a. cents total tax and costs, 50 II.
No Against east half lot Z, p and @, Fifth and
Sixth streets State and county tax, g 55; COSTS
62 cents: total tax and COSTS s3 II.
No. e-Against lots to s, z and Q, Twenty-sxth
and Twenty-seventh streets. State and county tax
S 95 costs, 10 cents; total tax and COSTS So "a
No. g-Againsi lot 3, r and s, Eleventh and
Twelfth streets State and county tax s. cents 4; |
costs. 81 cents total tax and costs, 81 80.
nnUNTV R0TT.