The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1882-02-17

At the call of the docket the following entries
were made:
Cases Stetted-AIartin and Rufus Lowe
VS. County Commissioners Farnandis and
II. W. Archer for plaintiffs, II. w. Ar
cher, Jr, for defendants. Rufus Lowe VS..
same; same counsel. Robert Jones VS. Swayne
Hughes " Swayne. Webster and Price for
plaintiff, Farnandis for defendants. j. NJ. Herr
man VS. garnishccs of o. ID. Horton. Gilbert
tor plaintiff Young for defendant James s.
Lytlc VS.. David Riley, garnishee of Durand u
Chlds. VIM. Young for plaintiff NnnBlbber
for defendant. Lamotte, use of Carl Eldman,
vs. Jonn w. Gallon VanBibber for plaintiff,
Stump and VIM. Young for defendant. Davis
IL Pugh VS.. Tide Water Canal Co. II. W. Archer
for plaintiffs, Price and Williams Tor defendant
Same vs.. Philadelphia " Reading Railroad Co.
Same counsel. Miles Whites executor vs. Geo
ii. Zimmerman. Fulford for plaintiff, William
Young for defendant. George Stockham VS..
Oathman Malcolm. II. w. and s. Archer
for plaintiff, Farnandis for defendant James
F. Gleason vs.. James johnson. Stump for
plaintiff, w. g. Scott for defendant John 7.
Bcknell VS.. o. C. Quincy. Williams for plain
tiff, Archer Il VanBibber for defendant. Anna
A. Quincy vs. Samuel Enfield, garnishee of John
I. Bickncll. Archer ~ NanBibber for plaintiff,
Williams for defendant Same VS.. John T.
Bicknell Same counsel Sameys o. c. Quincy
garnishcc of Bicknell IL Bicknell. Archer ~
NanBibbcr for plaintiff. George Page IL Co. VS..
David +. Michael. w. q. Scott for plaintiffs,
VIM. Young and Maynadier for defendant
George Mari Il Co. VS.. VIM. b. Jarrett. IL. W.
and 5. 9, Archer for plaintiffs, Williams and W. 6.
Scott for defendant. Adam b. Ebaugh VS.. II.
G. Dietrich. Archer IL NanBibbcr for plaintiff,
Maynader for defendant.
Timothy Callahan VS.. Charles Ayres iudg.
ment condemnation nisi. VanBibber and John
s. Young for piaintiil Same vs. same iudg
ment by default. Same counsel. Henry Mel
sons eXecutriX VS.. Fire Insurance Co.; off ii.
w. Archer and Maynader for plaintiff, Farnan-
dis " Scott for defendant. Geiser Manufacture.
ing Co. VS.. Fowler and Bramble; judgment by
more and Delta Railway Co. VS.. Noah r. Bull;
agreed NanBibber and II. w. Archer for
plaintiff, W. g. Scott for defendant Margaret
j. Brown vs.. Parker Browns administrator;
agreed: Williams for plaintiff, Price for defend
ant j. +. Tygert ~ Co. VS.. w. p. G. Whitaker,
trustee; oil Stump for plaintiff, Farnandis 4
Scott for defendant. c. w. Baker VS.. Frederick
Bechtold; off. Gilbert and w. &. Scott for
plaintiff, Stump and VIM. Young for defendant.
II. w. Archer, Jr., trustee, VS.. Mary f. Amos
ii. w. Archer for plaintiff, Lee for defendant
Keen IL Hagerty VS.. f. Heuer; judgment CON
icssed. Williams for plaintiffs, Maynadior for
defendant James Hopper ~ Co. vs. s. Il. Pen
ming and John II. Sarrick; Judgment on terms
filed. Williams for plaintiff, Noble l.. Mitchell
for defendants. Knowles d Anderson VS.. Jacob
p. Walker; Judgment on terms to be fled
Farnandis ~ Scott for plaintiffs, Gilbert for de-
PENDANT.
On Tuesday the case of Homard Terry, of &c.
Gil county, VS.. the Philadelphia, Wilmington
and Baltimore Railroad Company, came up
The suit was for damages alleged to have been
sustained by Terry by being put Off limited ex-
press train, in January, 1879. The plaintiff
boarded the cars at Perryville, to cross over the
river to Havre de Grace but the train did not
stop on this side of the river, and he, with a
companion named Mahoney, was put off. The
case was ably argued by Messrs. II, W. Archer,
II. Mccullough and Thackeray, OF the Cecil
bar, for the plaintiff, and Farnands IL Scott for
defendant. Verdict for plaintiff, $4,000.