The Sedalia weekly bazoo. [volume] (Sedalia, Mo.) 187?-1904, 1882-11-14
" Besides fat and those sub


Animal Chemistry, third edition, London.
p. y7-9S)
"For goodness sake in the chemical in
vestigation he might have at least left An
drew's speech, and looked at later edi-
ton than 1865. Nor is that all on that
phase taken from Andrew. On the philO-
sophical phase he quotes from John Stuart
Mill, rs quoted by Governor Andrew.
Mill, you see. is good authority with HIM
OH prohibition as it is with Governor An
drew, but / suppose he would call him
renegade democrat ON woman suffrage. lie
quotes from John Quincy Adams, as
quoted by Governor Andrew. Good
authority on this, but fanatic on aboli-
ticnism. He repeats from Gov. Andrew
the miracle of Christ turning water into
wine, and, though the sense is the same,
his greatest admirers Will hardly claim an
Improvement in the phraseOiosy. He
quotes page after page, 10 support his posi-
ton, from Macauley, Cooper, Bryant, the
Guardian and Ta,tler, and all taken from
the speech of Governor John a. Andrew,
of Massachusetts, made in a professional
way i'm 1867.
ONE WAS ENOUGH.
"As q matter OF economy, ii nothing else,
it was useless TO print the two speeches.
Governor Andrews, the impartial reader
must admit, is the best speech OF the two,
barring the similarity. and il Is but safe to
saw. that though the senator from Missouri
;rayersed the state In the cast off coat and
breeches OF Governor Andrew, he did not
wear the hat of that distinguished war
governor of Massachusetts,. = w. ~~p''
| hath this man grown all at one. .., L.. .-
tim alton of the honorable senator Supp =,
the argument had been OH the Oihv. >..e
Then he would have been y fanatic, blue
b.lli,d Yankee, u bigo,ed New EDgiander,
Puritan abolitionist Now, there is really
something amusing at the sight OF Cover
nor Andrew i'm spirit and Senator Vest Ill
persun canvassiny the state Oi Missouri or
the side of The liquor traffic. Again, | re
peat, ii any party in this state ex,'ec;s 20
defeat prohibition they have got Jn get VI
arguments vi more sense and learning thar
given out in the Andrew-NGst agglOm, Til
| tion."
ale seems to doubt your sincerity"
ayes, though at the same time he SAYS
| ne was not surprised. rs he knew L was
reiormer, and refers To- the gambling hght.
| cannot return the compliment, and his
illusions IU me personally are unworthy oil
a man. let alone a senator OF the tDite'i
States. Ii patriotism is democracy, ihen
| was a democrat when he was not. L have
acted with different parties, and exercised
within the domain of the law my rights "a
a citizen To express nv opinion upon ali
questions. And though In his estimation
nv reputation for political stability may
d. dilapidaied, ii never grew out al the iac'
that | had To- give up my convictions OF
change INV opinions at the point oil the
sword, the muzzie oil a musket ur the
mouth of a cannon. And | never vel
have turned To inndle the hand that chid
me. or sing hozzannas To the flag that
tried 10 trail in ignomiuy and Disgrace.
AN APPEAL TO THE RECORD.
"Three wears democrat. | canvassec
The state al Missouri in It's most danger
Gus localities in 1865 against the Drake
constitution whe1 the senator was an alien
All the political power possessed L gave
10 the liberal republican movement TO en-
franchise the oppressed people OF Mis-
souri,. and from the day the people gave
me the trust as lieutenant governor,
never have voted else than the democrati,
ticket.
But suppose had belonged to the part!
but two wears, does the senator mean Il
saw that would be deprived of the RICH
To criticise his action as a demOcratl,
leader. or the action of Mr.. Voorhees, or Mir
Morrison? III there is any such thing a
an interdict against expression IN demo
cratic discipline? Must Swi;z'er, Brooks
Brown, McM,chael and the host of like
5 thinking democrats i'm Missouri set quietly
by and see an arrogant aud despotlc powe
: assumed by leaders who have Tor year
been leaders to- defeat and disaster, withou
murmur or protest? Ii such be- democ
I racy you may look for few proselytes il
the future"
"Your criticism that they made a mis-
!, take i'm forcing the issue seems 20 hav
irritated him most"
"Yes that he gives as his excuse TO
! his unwarranied personal aliusion To me
He saws that il is somewhat strange that
should not have announced myself befor
on the question, and because have moi Ia
: intimates that have some selfish design L
= doing So Though the senator came iron
i good old Presbyterian ancestors, he admit
I'm mis- Boonvilie speech that he had fa!le
: from grace and strayed away from the ter
r cts taught by his father. Well, / ais
u came from the same stock and admit
0 have wandered from the teachings of m
! youth, but there is this difference betwee
the senator and myself: While he
! stubborn;y insisting, against ali reason an
right. in wandering still farther away.
am struggling hard in the the prime I
n NV m .nhood to retrace lost ground and
h good that my brother may not fal
!. Actuatsd by such motives l can stan
e even the unworthy, ungraciOus and III
+ manly reflections Of the senator, or Il
!. ,houghiless sneers of the anti-prohibitiol
{ lists"
q THE COMING ISSUE.
!. "You think this prohibition questio
d will he the great question next campaign
z "Verily | do. Ii will assume nations
Q proportions, ands throughout the countr
n there will be conversions rs sudden as tn
|. of ST. Paul. The scenes enacted daily ar
:, n;ybilv in this campaigu i'm ST. Louis a