New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-06-21
FURTHER DELAY IN THE MALLEY TRIAL

NEw-HAYEN, June 20.-At the opening Of
tue trial THE morning Mrs. Lotte f. Brown continued
her mOny which, was interrupted last week by tho
adjournment She began by giving account OF tho
first ride James Malley took with Jennie Cramer in July
last when she of tue party She said that on
Tuesday afternoon she received another note from
James Malley inq urng whether he should meet her at
her house or down the street They agreed 10 meet in
Tempe-st. near Elm at 1850 M, bnt James Maey and
Jennie Cramcr did not come. The Witness
then started to cross the Green TO do shopping,
when sac met James Malley with another man. whom
he introduced Mr. Duff. James said that they were
waiting for message from Miss CraIner aud asked tho
witness if she would be ready to riding at O'clock
After finishing her shopping she met them in Temple
ST. aud they drove to Miss Craners house FROM tnere
they went 10 BuelPs, ON the East Haven shore MISS
Cramer was with them. On arriving at their destns-
ton they met Walter Malley and Blanche Douglass,
After supper and some music they started for homo
driving direct to the witnesses house without stopping
T'he witness saw no more OF them that evening"
IN the Examination tho witness fixed the date OK
receiving the first July because she went 10 ruo
with Jennie Cramer Tuesday, July IL Inc iaos
came to her mind when she heard OF Jennie Cramers
body having been found, and her own name In tho
newspaper. Tier Aus)ahu' 81" sa'"' WINS """' Wv
deal OF the time
o-And Will, your husband was away you were 81
riding with James Malley
The witness made no reply.
,rrs Ella Eager testified that she was visiting her
| brotberin-law in New-Hayen last July. During her
visit Mrs. Brown called TO see her and sald she haa
an irvitaton Cor her go the East Haven shore Tor
= ,r,er at BuelPs she replied that she did moi care
~ On Mrs Brown then asked her II she wouid
90 IN Io,nes Maoy and tell him That evening she
went to see him IN company Win MIS- bfo"n' QUO '1
,o+ fulv decide whether she would go or not james
Naev WIS busy at the time she called at the sore' "
the witness DID not have any conversation with him
l,ad nreVinn al hepn a
the defence. was the next witness lie said he was
,erk in Klocks drug store and was familiar win tne
,he ride OF arsenic and also Fo1lers solomon oi AT
en,c Previous to June he had kept no record oil ne
soles of arsenic In bis store. lie SAID tna' IL tuc' "
sold bottle OF Fowers solution between June auO w
tober 1881 without q prescription there wouu D-'o
nr reeord of it ON the books. He exhibited 10 me
iurv three and one-ifh grains Of white oA'de o. 'r'o
bch no had been requested to weigh out Inc Po''o"
,vas nassed around to the jury to Snow no" 'i' ~
ouanrty was which the State ciAi"e ~
in Jennie Cramer's body' -, ,na-o ,v,s n ,,r
Al this point in the morning se's
-. ,tveep the lawyers OF tue oeIehoc
ference that they had concluded their tes-
IL Was cor short time they returned 70 TIE court
room and MI ssse We are substantially through, With
your ontlon OF "A single witness. We ma ouis'N'Ss
te because he is not here lrcfor TO Dr
ntto - Knstun lie L. not under the power OF sup
Ina being out OF the state he Is very ia mn
pr Ne oInnot get him here until Thursday Morn.
W. ak that your Honor give Us permission 70 in''
ce him later We may not be able to produce M 80
all We have other witnesses We may YET ger, ~ nr
are willing to lot them 20 and close our case Will D'
Mr. Doottle-I submit your Honor cannot dlreet US
On mad with our rebutal until tle dels1ee h oos
Closed You can give them an eAtchsiV ~ i.sntages
,ne,, ma take up the reDutal. Ihey nave ~
Which we nave not. They can take tue u vs. Snnst
this witness-something that We oAnno ,isv i'm ina
hing every witness here. Everyone must sss an he
re.nce IL The Jury This case has Deeh cioso only
plcso','I H. ~ To some weeks This witness IF ony
anted To- give au opinion. Others can DC GOV 10
| to wei
49, the case two days for witness wso ~ set
come especially when there wac ppoud give tue
| testimony .,,. ,,i.nass IN testify whether tno
,i ~os drowued We cannot get his equ'i ,ed aes
Dr. Harris has examined from one 70 wv ami
-, dr,woing md made hundreds OF postho' Lena mere
Ttons s equal in experience cannot 20 witness
| aionts We consider him q very imPVI'" n. TIA will
Tpo ~, ts can 20 ON with its rebuttaL d. h"
| surely be here. ,,uo,,.d each siie blaming the
,tcer for me ,eay. ON the promise enas Sssiuony.
| "anid close tneir case with Dr. hsiIls TSursday
wo pI Vpse adiourned Tho court Until iH'
| morning.