Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1882-05-22
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANh.

SATURDAY, May 90 1882.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
Morrison, C. j., presiiing; McKinstry j.: Mckee,
j.; Thornton, j.; Myrck, j.: Sharpstein, j.. Post,
Deputy Clerk !; Kewtn, Baiif.
S,420-County OF Sacramento vs. Central Pacific
Railroad Company Motion to dismiss appeal argued
by Raymond for respondent and Attorney General
Hart for the People, and submitted. Cause argued
by Attorney General Hart for appellant and Hay.
mond for respondent and respondent allowed thirty
days to file brief and appellant ten days to reply
cause to be then submitted.
s,402-People VS.. Chspman-Argued by Attorney
General Hart for the appellant and Edgerton for
spondent, and respondent allowed twenty days TO
file brief and appellant ten days to reply to
he then submitted.
Adjourned until Wednesday, at 10 A.. N.
DEPARTMENT ONE
Court met at 8 o'clock A. NJ for the regular May
session. Prcsent-McKinstry, j., presiding; Nc
Kee, j.; Myrick j.; Martin, Deputy Clerk finkler,
Bailiff.
Admission of Henry Sears-On motion Of A. NJ.
Rosborough, ESQ.,, and presentation OF license from
the Circuit Court Of Randolph county, State Of
Missouri, and evidence OF good moral character, it
is ordered that Henry Sears be and he is hereby ad
mitted to practice as an attorney and counselor in
all Of the Courts OF this State.
S,O90-Estate Of Montgomery-0n motion OF Ros-
borough for appellant, and by consent, cause sub
mitted on points and authorities on file.
S,2S3--Estate Of Montgomery-0n motion of Eli
for appellant and by consent, ordered that APP
peant have twenty days to file brief; cause to be
submitted thereupon.
S,092-Ely vs.. Foster ct al.-On motion of Garter
for respondent, and by consent, submitted on
points and authorities on file.
S,227-Bettes ct al. vs.. Townsend-On motion OF
Garter for appellant ordered that appellant have
twenty days to file brief, with ten days to respond
emit to reply cause to be submitted thereupon.
7,479-Montgomery vs.. Spect-On motion OF Har-
rington Tor respondent, ordered that appeal herein
be dismissed.
a mt "
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Court met at A. NJ. Reconsideration, c. j.,
presiding; Thornton, j.; Sharpsrein, j.; Post,
Deputy Clerk /; kewen, Bailiff.
S127-Doyle w. Sierra Buttes Gold Mining Com
pauy-0n motion of Edgerton and stipulation O 4
hle ordered that the appeal herein be and the
is hereby dismissed.
S,156-Younglove Vi. Nixon On motion of Arm
strong for appellant and by consent, ordered that
cause be submitted on poiats and authorities on
file.
Sl67-Marskers vs. Lask-On motion OF Edgerton
for appellant, appellant allowed thirty days to file
brief and thirty days to respondent to reply cause
to be then submitted.
s.264-Hines vs. Johnson-Argued by Van Chef
for appellant and Gale for respondent, and sub
mitted.
s,222-Parker ct al. vs.. Savage Placer Mining
Company-Continued for the session.
Adjourned until Monday at 10 A. NJ.
To-DAY's CALENDAR.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
S,3l4-Balch vs.. Jones.
S,375-Cross vs.. Zelarbach.
s, l45-Perham vs.. Keeper.
S,409-Lorenz vs.. Jacobs.
10,7F-Peopie vs.. Johnson
DEPARTMENT TWO.
7,76l-Mount Blanc c. N. Co. vs.. De Bour ct al
S,230-Sigourney VS.. Kent ct al.
S,372-C P. r. r. Co. VS.. Shaekelford.
s, 1S4-Carpenter ct al. We. Natoma W. and N. Co.
Court meets at 10 A. NJ.