The daily gazette., 1882-04-28
|kIOTI
In THE ORPHANS COURT, I
NEW CASTLE COUNTY.
TIE STATE OF DELAWARE,

NEW CASTLh SOUNT1.J
TEE STATE OF DELAWARE,
,o.S~, To Henry Walker, Margaret
lsEAL Mason, Eliza Walker, Isaac
wv walker. Kate Walker, Eliza
Walker, widow of Cornelius O. Wake,
Kate Deakyne, Ann, II. Walker, Rachel
Walker, Wilson W. Walker and Willard
W, Walker Greeting Whereas VIM.
W, Walker has filed his petition In our
Orphans Court for New CASTLE county,
selling forth that on the oath day of
made by the Houorabl Leonard +. Wales.
Judge Of this Court, Tor the paItitl n OF
that part OF the real estate OF Henry
walker, late of AppoqutDimink Hun
lred, deceased, heretofore assigned as
dover TO his widow, Phoebe l.. walker,
how deceased
That the free olders appointed in said
order have made return of Lheir pro-
eeedings hereunder to the present term
o. this Court whereby II appear that
they have made no partition OF said and
but have appral sed the same at the suIa
Of TWEEN five hundred dollars, which
return has been approved and confirmed
by this Court.
That the parties entitled 10 said land
are Henry Walker, Eliza Walker, Mar
garel Mason, Isaac Walker and Kate
Walker who together as the children and
M
ee.sed son Of said Henry Walker, the
inleatate, are entitled 10 the one-fifLh par /
thereol subject TO the right of dover of
iheir mother, Eliza Walker. widow OF said
VWpfnelius Z, Walker, deceased, RACHEL
5Iner vns aad Henry nSn,o H %sPlRsr' 'v Kate o
gether as children and heirs at law of
isaac T. Walker, a deceased son OF said
henry Waller, are eht tied to the one
pp.lh plh p ~ thereof subject to the dover OF
nschel Walker, widow nf said Isaac p.
WALKER, deceased, Wilson W. Walker,
" Willard W. Walker and your petitioner,
William W. Walker, ,sonsof said inlestate
wao are eGch entitled 10 the one-hILh
part thereof
That all OF the said parties reside in
New castle County and Stale of Della
SS Tse except Eliza Walker, widow oi
walker, Isaac Walker, Margaret Mason,
A LiIa Walker and Kate Walker, his
children who reside in the State of Penn
99yIVshla, and Henry H. Walker, son o.
n dsSSe walker, decd, who resides IL
SppieaDle TO the said estate, the parties
enotled e as Aforesaid have the right u
accept the whole of haid lands and prem
,S nes AZ the Aforesaid appraised valul
sai,, sae,eoI, ~ Ia the order prescribed by tn
PFNANiOhNL ~ duNlbtA huu Dt1lGNbl
sn nat none OF the parties entitled will
aSsept %htp OF ehoose the land and premises
N., NMu'sn S nave oeen appraised as Aforesaid
w ueslre that The same may be sold.
uaouI petitioner therefore prays You
mouoIs mat an order may be made 70
a ns sale OF the said lands and premises 81
%ppipldlsed as Aforesaid, aud TO grant
ulol the other parties entitled q
S,U,esalu S" 10 appear In this Court on som
sb III said rule TO be appointed an
noW cause ltany they have why an OIL
VI sale of said premises shall not b
mat behalf. SNe
so,ty, now, therefore, we command you tn
EIi1, Fiji henTy Walker, Margaret Masol
WaIl, VII Walker, Isaac Walker, Kal
nst,neF, nHt,ReF, Eliza Wslker, widow of Go
Eus =. Walker, decd, Rachel Warne
i wy Wy ID. Walker, Kate Deakyne, Ann
WoWalker, Racnel Walker, Wilson v
Inc aeI ne. ana Willard w. Walker that la
inc ue All business and notwishBtan
Sny excuses you be and appear at 9
onmahs m Conri 10 be held at WilmipetC
and dtVSnoay the h day OF May next, IN,
WIN Iueie toshow cause, IL cny YOU nav
Ehny,,i1ne tne prayer in the above petite
Gulu not be granted. Witness n
celinr nn Willard Salisbury, Cha
mingtnnr ressioent ssn OF Raid Court at w
iSsa aS'oh THIS 2lst day Of February, A.
Attest: J. M. HoUsMAN.
Issued February %, 1882. 0ierk Swin =; IN