The new North-west. [volume] (Deer Lodge, Mont.) 1869-1897, 1882-04-21

FRIDAY, 18TH.
1863. lilly Wenandy VS.. John Wenandy
divorce; trial by jury; verdict for defendant
1913. James r. Davidson VS.. Kate NJ. Dav
idson; divorce; trial by jury; in this cause
the only evidence introduced was on the par
of the plaintiff, showing that the defendant
had been guilty Of adultery, and the jury re
turned a verdict for plaintiff without leav
ing their seats, and decree of divorce wa:
granted accordingly.
SATURDAY, April 18th.
1862. Granville Stuart, receiver, etc., VS.
Patrick A. Largey; liability on bank stock
cause dismissed as settled.
1926. Territory W. VIM. Curtis; assault will
| intent to commit murder; found guilty o.
simple assault and fined 500 and costs.
MONDAY, APRIL 18TH.
1775. George Tbbets, Frederick L. Wis
| ner, Robert T. Harris, Edward Moore, Gus
tavus Wisner and William NJ. French VS.
All Tong, All Bow, All Tip, All Kip, AL
Gun, All Tow, All Cow, All You, All Wo
All Toone, All Soon and All Wung, com
prising the firm of You Sing Hong Company
title to placer; trial of cause completed and
given to jury who returned a verdict as in
structed by the court, in favor of the defend
ants.
1916. James McDonel ct al VS. Henry Milot
this is a case in which McDonel, Hammond
81 Co., of Philipsburg, about August 9th, SS1
hired a team to Milot to drive to Butte; OF
the return trip one of the horses died neal
MS an naI In
the Probate Court in which McDonel & Co.
were awarded $50 damages, and the defend
ant appealed to this court; cause on trial be
fore jury.
1867. Richard 7. Kennon vs. John T. Gil
mer ct AL damages; motion to strike out par
of complaint overruled; demurrer to second
amended complaint overruled; motion fol
change of venue submitted and taken under
consideration.
TUESDAY, April 18TH.
1916. James McDonel ct al VS. Henry Milot
trial continued; jury returned verdict fol
plaintiffs for SIPS.
1882. In the matter of the estate of George
7. Hale, deceased; appeal of administrator
from order of Probate Court disallowing GER
tain claims paid; submitted and taken under
advisement. Wednesday the appeal was sus
tanned and claims ordered allowed.
ZIG. Margaret Lanahan VS. Thomas Lana
han; divolce; decree entered.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10TH.
1893. Henry G. Walton VIZ. James S. Nc
Andrews; debt; on issues of fact; continued
for the tenn.
1858. Frank Baudet vs.. Frank BouteIlier
accounting; on issues of fact; defendants
motion for non-suit sustained as to one cause
OF action and overruled on a second; submit
ted 10 court and TAX IN under advisemenG. Or
Thursday the court referred the case to III. r
Whitehlll, Esq, to take testimony, etc.
1896. Territory VS. Lee Vim; convicted o.
burglary; motion for new trial overruled.
1863. The People of the Territory of Mon
tana, ex rel. James b. McMaster, vs.. Lee w
Foster, VIM. NJ. Jack, and J. Ross Clark
usurpation of office; action dismissed b,
consent Of parties.
1885 Napoleon Pecead VS.. Michel Mar
ellie; on appeal; cause continued fol- Term.
1861. John G. Belk VS. William T. Board
man and the National Mining and Explor
ing Company; title to quartz lode; on issue
of fact; cause dismissed.
THURSDAY, APRIL 20Ta.
1868 Elijah T. Huson VS.. John A. Feather
man, James b. McMaster, Joaquin Abascal
James Laforcade, William Il. Ferguson
| Jacob Franzman and Horace A. Prossel
partition and accounting; on leave to answer
| ejectment on issues of fact; cause referred t
III. II. Whitehill, Esq., 10 take testimony an
make PARTITION.
1888. o. J. Watts VS.. George w. Lee; dis
| missed for want of prosecution.
Cases of VIM. weinstein VS. Algonquin
Mining Company, and County Treasurer "
Algonquin Mining Company, were unde
| consideration yesterday.
Court will probably adjourn to-day.