The Colfax chronicle. [volume] (Colfax, Grant Parish, La.) 1877-1981, 1882-09-16


District Court.
At the term OF court which ended
last Tuesday larger amount Of BUSH
ness was transacted than at any term
for three years past. Judge Barbin
did good work in so nearly clearing
our docket. The following is the en-
tire list of cases brought before him
at the late sitting:
No. l-Srcccssion of Meredith Calhoun,
deceased, answer to rule of III. Mcknight,
administrator, upon Geo. w. Lane to pro-
duee title papers, etc., in said succession,
| iIed by G. w. Lane, who was given until
the third day Of the November term OF
court to make further showing.
16-State of La, vs.. John X. Gray, jury
case, continued.
| No. 10 Probate Succession of John
Schonoyer. Mrs. Ammons, grandmother
| to children of deceased, appointed and au-
thorized to qualify "a legal tutrix.
| 64-Leopold Lecoumb OF al vs.. w. s.
Calhoun, continued.
! 65-Frank Ii. Page vs.. the parish of
Grant, Judgment for dcfendent, new trial
| granted.
75-Morris Kraft VS., NJ. r. Machen, jury
case, continued.
lO1-H NJ. Jster VS.. J. w. Johnston,
| jury case continued
l2,-SamueI Michel transferce of Jos
Hoy Co. vs.. Thos. Hickman, continued
123-W. L. Richardson VS.. G. w. Lane,
dismissed by consent at plaintiffs cost.
l29-C. II. Teal ct al vs. u. II. 4umford,
Itary case, continued.
lS3-C. E. p. Calhoun VS.. Levin Smith,
A. A. Goodwin intervenor, Judgment for
plaintiff, new trial granted.
! lS5-Samuel Mclaughlin va. n. Nc
Knight ct al, continued.
138-A. A. Goodwin VS.. Emanuel White,
continued.
l40--H. A. Thompson va. Peter Hick-
man. Judgment for plaintiff.
| HE G. Ranpoiph vs.. l. A. Laysard,
continued.
| l45-Emeline Mayo Hagan vs. Stephen
d. Hagan, jury case, continued.
159-A. Balding & Co. VS.. G. n. Num-
ford ct al, jury case, continued.
l65-Isaac Hall va. j. w. Johnston,
Judgment for plaintiff by consent.
l54-J. G. Wickliffe Va C. II. Mumford
aud Sheriff, judgment for plaintiff.
l67-C. II. Munlford VS.. hss creditors Tor
respite. continued.
i6s WIN. II. Rigging vs. Thomas Johns,
continued.
i6y-H. Mcknight VS.. C. G. Dunn, dis
missed at plaintiffs cost.
l73-w.C. Shepherd vs.-M. N. Carna-
han, continued.
l74-Marion f. Machen vs.. Alfred Bell,
default entered and case continued.
l75-Albert Baldwin VS.. Meredith CAL
! houn, default
l76--Ci,izens Bank of La, vs. Meredith
Calhoun. Judgement for paintif revivine
Judgment. s....
houn, default entered.
. l8O-Alfred WaddeIl vs. G. II. Teal ct n
Judgment for defendants.
lSl-M. NJ A. Lane w. r 8. Cameron
J prayer for jury fled by plaintiffs, jury a.
. lowed and case continued.
l84-M. n. A. Lane and husband W
succession Of Giles Smith ct al, continued
, lE5-Sumpter Turner VS.. H. Mcknight
administrator. Judgment for plaintia.
} l66-Mrs. Rosa r Dunn vs.. Milton A
, Dunn, Judgment for plaintiff
: l86j-M. Ryan Va J. b. Mccoy, passed
81 lS7-Chaffe & Powell vs. C. Z. Dunn
dismissed at plaintiffs cost
Is8-Isaac w. Moon vs.. w. s. Calhoun
1S9-Lionel l. Ievy va d. n. a. Lane
Z default entered and wife authorized =
q stand il Judgment default proved up
judgement made final against the individua
: half interest of w. 8. Calhoun in Smith
, field. Fcrenxi, Mixabeau, Nerideth plants
tions and the Ffeedmens Home plantation
9 and the lots in C0lfAx
vi l90-Louisa ]. Bristar Va Geo. W. Hen
negsu, defanlt entered, and continued
Z i9l-Dediu Frcdieu vs. C. II. Teal, shez
III ct al. exception sustained. Judgment 70
= ia-J. s Moore Us. A. G. LOWS Ct q
: iss-Howsrd Mcknight, administrator
+ va C. E. p. Calhoun and husband, judl
i meut for plaintiff by concant.
l94-John G. Wicklif1e va g. ". Ian
q Judgment for plaintiff.
III lS5-C. II. Thomas w. q. W.. Lane jnd(
ment for plaintiff
r i9s-Abs Eeholls va @. ". Lane jnda
> ment for plaintiff:
lU-W. s. Calhoun VS. G. W. Lam
, indgn,ent for defendcnt. -
!, 1SS-W. p. Hickman rs. Victor Hall a.
John Williams, Burr Wilson 1ntervs'o
n Judgment for plaintiff.
a Nos. 100. 100, 2g1, 202 and o5-Kensha
y Cammack 4 Co. vs.. Nick Cock1eid, vi
n ham Dudley. Ransom Tr0van, Nose HUI
II ter and Lev. Jones-judgment for pia1ntii
2Os-C. H. Teal VS. X Wilkins Ut
1T Judgment for plaintiff
219-Mary /. Grow VS.. G. W. Lane Of
:, judgments for plaintiff.
Vernon parish is to have . new
s-&,----a<1.-l.--l - T-o~,sf