The semi-weekly miner. [volume] (Butte, Mont.) 1882-1886, 1882-03-29

OF The Regular Session OF ,h.
tE1ot Court Yesterd.v

Court convened a. usual and III.
utss Of preceding day were read ,,s 'a'
proved.
In case No. l'~. H. Hen,uy.o,
II. N. smith; repleyin; the tri.,
which was begun on Monday, tn. IT,, W
were celebrating all day y..t.. !I9
This ~ one Of those notable ,,,,ex .,s:,
are collected, bound in calfskin "s,
called "I.esding Cases." The .,,, :'a
Of the controversy is q horse the w.. s'
Of which may be presumed to ,e f.. .e
the evidence, not more than fiji, w.
Lam. II consumed half day If >,
Court and the time OF the judge =.
Clerk. three learned counsel and ,,.s Wv
ty-four jurors Monday. II con.um.,
the time Of twelve Jurors all day y,.,s.
day. The lawyers fees amounted
about one hundred dollars, the i,,rv TO-.
to about the same amount in a,l,,ition :,
the salaries Of the Clerk and Judge ana
oil this for 4 fifty dollar nay. A..
costly and mature delil,eration the inn.
brou ght in verdict awarding the hon.,
to the plaintiff and sa'l'lliny half n.
costs on each party. Let justice prpv,,
though the heavens fall.
In No. 49,, Jas. 4. Murray ". L4,A
H. Freeman; f0rcible entry; "a n,otio,
for a continuance was argued. und i
was ordered that the cast. Ike vet FIR ,,;.,
ON tomorrow, Thursday morning W.,
o'clock.
In No. 81, James A. Murray ". Cec
e.. Fitschen 1T. H.; the defendants mil.
mittetl y judgment In their favor axainr
the plaintiff, and the same was e,.
tered.
In No. III, Edward Rooney It al. u.
Geo. H. Tong ct al, to quiet title. a
judgment for defendants Was submitte,
to the court, approved and ordered en-.
tered, aud jury fee Of -: was taxed
against the plaintiff:
The trial Of case No. ~, Joseph Kun.
worth W. Geo. G.. Fitschen, for the no..
session Of the piece of property now o..
cupied by defendant on Main street, Va
then begun. Plaintiff claimed to hold
. lease for tive years from Bogk, th+
former owner. Fitschen produced y
deed from Bugk for the property, and
claimed by virtue of the deed that Kuh.
worth's leoee was ineffective.
Pending the trial special venire Nos
was issued for . sufficient number Of
jurors to fill the panel. The following
named persons were returned a. served:
James Terry, l.. f.. Manning. R. Nc
MINI, H. McKinstry, f.. 4. Nichols.
s. NJ. Childs and J. H. Reynolds.
After the plaintiff rested his csse thu
defendants counsel moved the ourt fof
u nOn-suit, which motion was over
ruled, and to which the counsel for de-
PENDANT excepted. The jury retired late
In the afternoon, and after short DELHI
Grafton brought in 4 verdict for the
plaintiff, taking, under the instructions
of the court, the view that the plaintiff.
lease antetlate.l any legal vcsting Of title
in defendant, and that therefore whrn
title did vest in defendant ii was subject
t0the lease.
Miscellaneous business Il. follows W.T.
transacted OH Monday, hut not entere'
on the minutes in time I" appear IN
Tuesdays MINER:
In case No. rs, Sherr W. Purcell. I"
quiet title, judgment for the pla'n''"
was submitted and ordered entered.
In No. 164, Lizzie 4. Wagstsif v
Dennan =. Wagstafi;. for divorce. IT.
cree for the plaintiff wiz submitted al"
ordered entered.
In No. 1877, Lee W. Poster 1t III. w.
Thomas NJ. Lowry, replcvin, jury wa
expressly waived, and the trial OF toe
cause commenced to the court alone
Pending the trial the defendant "i'erto
to amend his answer, in consequence"
which the further trial of the 's'''''
was temporarily sustained.
THE BROADWAY MINE.