New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-08-25
TURNED OUT OF HER HOUSE.
MRS p1.ycK,s UyKlND sTEPCHMDREN.

AGAINST A STEPMOTHfR
In the Jefferson Market Police Court, yester-
day morning before Justice Ford James a. Chamoers'
oee fortvaeven clerk NJ No 419 Grandst, aud James
Dillon who claims to be a special deputy sheriff, OF NO.
$50 second.ave were arragned on charges preferred
by Mira Amanda Blanck the wife of William H. Banok'
Of No Ga Perry-st. After preliminary hearln. tho
case was adjourned TIL p IN.
About ten months ago William F. Banok. about sixty
years of age who has five children, and Is said to Dc
worth about $150,000, made in the lurhl'"o
business in Hudsonst. and who IS no" i"
silent parter in the firm OF Blanck BroS''
OF Horato-st married Mrs. Amanda warner
the widow OF Greenpont truckman The children Oh
Mr. Blanck were not informed Of his intended marriage
until about week before tooA P
The ceremony performed ny '"o
Rev Dr. wilson, Presbyterian clergyman, at his mouse
in Flfyseventh-st At the close of the ceremony inc
clergyman congratulated Mrs Blanck ON being .no
most fortunate bride in New-YOrk." In the
light OF recent occurrences, Mrs. Blanck does
not exactly see on what basis she
may consider the congratulations as Dorhe out
by the facts. Mr.. Blanck owns the iourstory
and basement brown-stone house al NO Oh
FORREST. TO which they went Immediately after
their marriage. At the time the house
was occupied by Alfred W. Gedney Mr.. Blancks son-in
law his unmarried SON. Thomas j. Bhnok ana his TWO
dangIcr7' sau'cy nsT sso last Monday MIR
younger; p WS,v4t Soccomnrnicd by Mamie
ANA 70 N sra fS N Last Moday Mr. Bnck c his
wfc and daughter at sea Gin saying he was coming TO
NcwYork, and that re would return I,r WIN Ronc l5
SS 6e could not return on Tuesday but would be
some reason she was alarmed, and leaving
Mamie Al sea CifT camo up to the city: She
TSR, Returned oV ses Ca When she got there she
found Mamie gone, and note from her stepSon Ihonas
who had been thcre Ill her absence ana taken Mamie
away. He left note saying that ne done so ut
ca M Ills law Office No 80 Nassatst. lac would explain
the matter 10 her Mrs Blanck did not accept the lny-
on wednesday. The house in Perrysi. was SIN Locked
when she reached it, but by securing the services OF
ocksmith she obtained admission one ad oeel III ne
house only short time when she saw three men com
Ing over the fence in the back yard. These men were
Chambers and James Dillon They claimed to be ~
possession Of the house and made at
Chambers and Dillon were arrested On an
STsT Sofd by Her ana aaP the e sn
the case were brought ont Mrs BaG6 was PcTr ao
p' Mrs b Banck in her testimony before Jus
already given. size said that the furniture IN
their house belonged to herself and her hug
him except when She wanted money IRON him
purchase clothes for his younger children Nneh 7n
the fence and came in at f4s rear ceased basement d
promises and now you get out You've turned me ma
9 %S oa GU" Mr. and B@Sk had s9gS SPOKEN
TO his Wife of his intention to Lease aG
n me FREY T prSsd scgss d P%e
became very abusive. When Mrs. Blauek
He9 10 Go to =" Al The conclusion of Mrs Banck's
testimony The prisoner counsel ,,ir asked p,
"My husband" was the reply. ,
The counsel for the defence exhibited lease executed
by william Blanck to fired W. Gedney o. the premises
AT No. OF Pcrry-st., for one year, elSht months
and thirteen days, from August - loS2 at rental OF
Thomas j. Blanck.
shown n1Sn"' no proof to Mrs. Banck Of the leas-
ing Of the prGpSrs ana @ s1e eny Wss Soc
absence 1t was further claimed that
fnr pnIavfui purposc~ and ordered MIS-. Banck. the
rightful owner out; that they hd been ordered out
against her protest and dsorieiiy and abusive;
that they refused when AGAIN ordered ont that
| he ptemises were her husbands. and that
& oold ntr roll their Ilse during his absence and tnat
| 9iedueV did MOI even show the lease, and had no
| lawful authority to authorize the prisoners or
anyone Ie ef because hey became rcspasser by
REFUSING 10 20 when ordered do u-iug violent Ian
Gedney on being sworn, said that the men were in
| the house by his authority ana rai he wa
| the lessee. Either the Original lease or Il
duplicate given him. and in7 ehse was exhibited IN
court He too POSSESSION o. Med1rsdH{ aor,S, ne
| found tie door hoted from the Islic ana 80
| got IN nj the He didn't show tine lease
TO aYs. Bnch aaH Tr %'T be ua'o r "U od t have
done 80 under the CIRCUMSTANCES, shd NJ Gcuney lie
engaged Chambers 10 act as Nuchlnin ilb dutHOlIlN
10 Chambers, written on a pi1t ol inc Hrni Vi
| Blauck 4 Brothers WIS exhibited 1" me court
at he house al night He did not ten Mrs 81 mex 10
| Go to -" and dld not near anyon else 10 so.
james Dillon said he was employed by Or. Nedney 3
counsel Richard j. Lewis. OF No 80 Nar7aust to 90 10
the house Of Mr. Blanck Tie counsel Tor the ne encc
made a motion to dismiss The complaint, winch was de-
MED by Justice Ford, on the ground mat me
| the defence claimed that tlr 6cincy, the lessee,
had right to enter his own premises in any way he
pleased Il might have becu wise Tor him to show his
authority to Mrs Bianck, BAT Ll5 mere saJng that he
had the lease sufficient; he had right 10 turn Mrs
| Blauck out and with violence IL necessary. Justice
"WIers is Mr. BlancSg"
eight before you in this lease. which is JUS
as god as though he were here in person"
,t ~ ~ Iyer. ,youi he proper TO have MIN
here to deny or ahirn II, validity MI BancA ana ms
friends have not acted unod ssey ana his position Is
justice Ford ed if any civil proceedings would grow
on OF thc case, 10 when Nj. D,dnGy IePon ~ In, IN,
house aud sell The furniture. and
! Blanck's counsel claimed that the prisoners
| had no right TO take violent pos e7-ion. justice
| II civil case Mr.. Gcdney thought the Judge should
nut proper In charge o. the property Ihcle an
SAID, referring To TIE men placed there under orders
from Mrs. BldncAs COUNSEL Inc prisoners were ulS-
LIZ Mr., Banck ana her friends IN posses
sion OF the house She talked freely 10 reporter OF
ThE TRIBUNE IN regard to the case she SAID mat me
| trouble caused by Mrs. Geihey; VINO was
in charge OF the house until Mrs. Blauck
married her father. She was Jealous at tho
Introduction OF another hOu,ckeoper, aud tho children
had al treated her uukihdly she proposed TO HphOd
Itls understood that Mr. BIauck is in NewJerscy,
where he has properly Mrs. Blmck ral- II she could
hin she i. that everything COcid bc anlcaDY
adjusted, but that he is unduly influenced against her by
his children.
CROPS IN VARIOUS PARTS