Savannah morning news. [volume] (Savannah) 1868-1887, 1882-02-07

ko5t- v. Patterson vs. b. Fraser Grant.
Sstssed.
ou secount Judgment for plaintiff for
$50 %. besides interest from January l,
1873
wv. schIeT & Co. Va n r Lee. Notes
ard zeeruus Judgment for the plaintiffs
for s. IS 81 a. principal, besides interest
on S744 "a from Deeember 19, 1851, ard %
$50 from Decenber 5, 1881, and On 1910 81
from November ;, ISL, and costs Of SUIT
TIE Bank Of Augusta vs. Gleason & Har-
uou- Note and srcouEt- Judgment for
ire plaintiff for SSOS, with interest firm
October ri, ISL, with costs OF suit % be
levied OF the individual and co-psrtner-
ship property OF said Defendants
s1lliTsu & Early IS. Newton Z Lee. Ac-
count Judgment for the plaintiff for S91l
=. orfre+0sl ard interest from November
18th, 1851.
D-L.ncey jerks, plaintiff. and 2 J. Art
son, defendant. Case. judgment for plsir-
Fl for $40 with Interest from 18Th March,
1873, with costs OF suit.
A1nabsIla J. Boutwell, rs. Richard ".
Woodbridge. Judgmsnt for the plaintiff in
TIE sun Of e. 1876 p principal, With seven
PER cent. Interest from the Z9sh day Of
March, 1881.
D. B. Noulton & Co. Va D. c. Butler.
Judgment for plaintiff for $500 81 principal,
xf-h Interest On S297 from September 25-b,
ISL, and On s19s 3 from October 12sh,
1851.
Il. ". Hacker. Jr., ". W. c. Butler.
Ju1gnent for $50 50, with interest and
cess OF suit.
Henry ". French. surviving copaTtner Of
7. P. Richardson q Co, Ts: W 9. Butler.
Juduent for plaintiff for S4l7 %, interest
and costs Of suit.
willy P. farrell Va r ". Woodbridge
ard r " Wood bridge, administrator estate
q Wyllv Woodbridge. Statutory action on
note judgment BY the court for the
plaintiff for g., 959 S. principal. and
s. 70 60, that IS 70 say against the
saii z. ". Woodbridge indi fdu2lly as
maker, ard against him Is administrator Of
ne estate Of WyIly Woodbridge endorser,
deceased, 70 be levied on the pro perry Of
sid z. u. Woodbridge, and on the pro
peTty o. ssid estate In the hands OF said Z.
" Wood bridge.
Annzbela j. Boutwell, misunderstanding
estate Of S z Boutwell,, deceased, vs. r. ".
Woodbridge. judgment for the plaintiff
for 1893 q principal, with Der cent. inter
est from N Tember 17-h, 1879.
Wm. s. LAYTON Vs. James q Roberta
judgment for the plaintiff for 800, and In
terest a. per cent. frOm lst January, 1852
a. G. TGnst2H Va. s. A PughsleY, Jr.
JUDGMENT for plaintiff for 1857, With inter
est a. Z per cent. from Dist March, 1880.
Reid & ClossOn Vs. W. q. Butler. Jude-
ment for plaintiff for SzS5 63 principal, with
interest from November d. 1881
Alexander & Maxwell, plaintiffs In attach
ment, vs. J. z Keller, defendant 10 attach
meut, aud J. z. Keller & Co. claimants.
Ire death Of two Of the claimants being
suggested, ordered that the case proceed
uuder the name Of William z. 81 Joseph Z.
G. Alexander surviving copartners.
J. g. Est1 vs.. Coast Lice Railroad, and
John Flsnnery, administrator, Garnishee
Order 70 authorize A. ?. IL s. B. Adams to
take out Of court the gzrnishment papers.
The grand i1ry we're discharged until the
9Th instant, and the petit jurors until
"wednesday. S.h instant, TO which time the
court adjourned.
Court met at 4 o'clock yesterday after
noon for the trial Of criminal cases, when
the following we're disposed Of:
Safe We. Joe Burns Carving concealed
weapon. S25 or three months.
State vs.. Henry W. Wet. Carrying g
concealed weapon and pointing q weapon at
another. as Ia each case or three months
on the chain gang.
State vs. Susan Robinson. Assault and
battery. Not guilty.
W. w. Macksl, Jr., Esq., was appointed
Solicitor General pro tenn.
Court adjourned until Monday next at
p. m.
Quarterly session adjourned until Wednes-
day next at 10 a. N.
ASSIGNMENTS.
The following cases were assigned for
trial on the days named:
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9.
IA H. L. schreiner rs. John T. s. De
Montmollin and Louis II. De NoDtmollin.
R. r Richards for plaintiff L. Il. De Mont
molhD for defendsnts.
Is John L. Hsrdee vs. P. BandtholtZ, John
scholl claimant. w. w. Msckall and ". C..
Collier for plaintiff; j. Z. Saussy for de-
fendant.
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10.
2. w. W. Mackall, Jr., assignee, vs.. j. Fl.
Lmmer, Fl. Hull & Co, garnishees. N. G.
Collier for plaintiff; Il. R. Jackson for gar
nishees.
3. J. H. Estil VS.. Coast Line Railroad.
Cunningham and Lawton for plaintiff;
Lester & Rayenel, A. P. & S. B. Adams for
defendant.
MONDAY, FEBRUARY -.
IL. Jesse Crummey, Jr., VS.. Haslam &
Hawkins. Lester 81 Ravenel for plaintiff;
J. r. s4ussy for defendants.
%. Gleason 81 Harmon vs.. Central Rail-
road and Banking Company. Collier, Chsrl-
ton and Msckall for plaintiffs; Cunning
ham and Lawton for defendant.
ICEcDAI,
90 Geo. P. Evans, administrator, vs.. John
scholl. A. B. Smith for plaintiff; r. r.
Richards for defendant.
30. Rawls BAKER vs. Fred P. Miller. A.
B. Smith for plaintiff; VIM. Clifton for de-
fendant.
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY IS.
IL. T. L. Willy and G. b. Clarke, execu-
tors, VS.. Levi j. GsZan. A. P. 81 8. B.
Adams for plaintiff; Garrard & Medium
for defendant.
a Peacock, Hunt & Co. vs.. J. ]. Nc
Donough. r Falligsnt for plaintiffs; Gar
fard & Meldrim for defendant.
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 10.
ID. A. T. Lee VS.. r. 7. Hull. Collier,
Charlton & Mackall for plaintiff; Garrard &
Meldrim for defendant.
45 George Pausch vs.. A G.. Guerard ct
al. II. G. Everitt for plaintiff; A. P. & s. B.
Adams for defendant.
FRIDAY. FEBRUARY IL.
6. Josiah sibley VS.. George w. Haslam.
A. P. & 8. B. Adams for plaintiff; J. r.
Saussy for defendant.
Is Jno. T. Robertson vs.. Wilder 81 Co.
Collier, Charlton q Mscksll for plaintiff;
L. H. DeMontmollin for defendant.
THURSDAY, MARCH 2.
8. ]. G. Watts vs. Ed. A. Condit.
l. A'f41uuFT Mh4HSl FB % RAbtACrs
J. E Kittles & Co., claimants. A. 2. q 3.
B Adams for plaintiffs; P. w. keldrim for
defendant.
FRIDAY, MARCH 3.
g s. Guckenheimer VS.. John LANCE and
Anna Meyer, claimants. Garrard 81 Mel
drim for plaintiff; Z. r. Richards for de-
PENDANTS.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5.
81. r. A. Fleming VS.. Central Railroad
and Banking Company. Lester q Ravenel
for plaintiff; A. Z Lawton for defendant.
80. Mcmahon, Stokely & Co. We. Central
Railroad and Banking Company. Lester d
Ravenel for plaintiffs; A. r. Lawton for
defendant.
80. MeCord & Foster VS.. Central Railroad
and Banking Company. Lester & Ravenel
for plaintiffs; A. r. Lawton for defendant.
THURSDAY. MARCH 9.
43. Francis N. McIntire VS.. Southern Bank
OF the State OF Georgia. Garrard Il Mel
drim for plaintiff George A. Mercer for de-
PENDANT.
FRIDAY, MARCH 10.
2 Thos. W Lund VS.. Georgia and Florida
Inland Steamboat Company. K. r. Richards
for plaintiff; 5. Y. Levy for defendant.
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8.
10. l. Drsyton LaRoche vs.. VIM. B. stur-
tevant and VIM. 8. Cherry. d. A. O'Byrne
for plaintiff; j. j. Abrams for defendants.
IS. Saussy q Harmon VS.. w. +. Barry. j.
r. saussy for plaintiffs.