New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-09-14
THE REMARKABLB VERDICT.
,.,,ronrs TO HAVE III SET ASIDE.

EFFORTS TO HAVE II SCI ASl'E'
,no,.,,,.>,rs. of COUNSEL on BUHALF OF THE CON
x,,crrn ,,rv-A FURTHER HEARING TOMORROW
WASHINGTON, Sept. 13.-The Criminal Court
mot this morning Judge wyle PRESIDING Tor the PuI
Dose Of hearing arguments on the motions entered upon
Monday las, for arrest OF Judgment III res"" 10 "o
and Rerdeu and 10 Increase the bonds OF inc ",l'
rs 10 whom the jury failed to agree Brady "c anu
W Dorsey were present and as soon as the CONF "'
called 10 order Rerdcn ana Miner entered eso" 10" ~
two sh. riffs. .,o 20
Mr. Ucnklo stated that yesterday he filed mou'h 10
have the verdict set aside as being unre oN"''o a."
AGAINST the evidence lie thought 1t pE0oaole HUH WA"
appeared IN the evidence ,,,osto
The Cour: nnterruptng)-I am perfectly DIN" Il" ~
evervtbinc that takes place in the ucwsi aperS
Mr. Henkie-In view OF the extraordinary state
,oent made by the foreman Of the jury thous' '"'
perhaps the Court . ~, ont,
abatement ia the newspapers ana r'a'y INV NV Co.,
tnen But II there be any statement OF consequence o
tho consideration OF the Court, t viii have 10 DO pre-
$50 IN the form OF an AFFIDAVIT that il can become
mart OF the records OF the Court
NJ uo,kleI sec from the papers that the foreman OF
the Jury has formally presented an aihAaV" l" 'Ho
trict Attorney and thought that II pIeSeH'eu "o-
matters would ren0er II neoO'9i' Wv
should SCI aside the verdict.
The Court-The Court cannot act WithouS SOHO
grounds. - NJ. ors
Mr. Heukle-The town IS filed with OIL SORTS OF rlo''
hardly necessary to say that the verdict was an
extraordinary one. 1t would seem TO De Vhe proper
thing for the Court do to set the verdict sue III" "
treat these defendants who were convicted IN the same
manner a. those to whom the jury failed 10 agree ney
were certainly not any more guilty am Ner! Sui' VI.
may he ed to refer 10 III that that Is the pnDo
sentiment. 49,. .,.or would ne laid aside
for The present and that the matter OF polLs Wou pe
totn no lie held that subsisting bonds wonld con
Snu III far tut uctcuuAu'9 a.
fury failed agree were c0hcti an, tant
McI1ick cOncurred. Nj MerncK ho"eVg', n conr in
Wales bond should be increased ana 'AT Niu M
creased $1,000 TO $1,000 -, T.
Coming back the ques ION Of seltS asGe le
dict Mr. HeYke argued that the verdict WIS lAoonSi9
tent with the scheme OF the indictment 900, ,oso %
oonslH% az eni - verdict against two at least They
haye found two guilty and acquitted one, luIhoi WA
MOI ned ana have 10. been able TO agree as to me
others il OF the mysteries Oh 'ne Jul3 RON , a.
to the which tAejWY us|c'u NJ su IT, was
SeT1I' c the Jury mad tIo power render under
Ibs srruction of tue Court. though IN ths CONSPIRACY
there wer. some mote pIonin, A"n offers VINO HS
be called the tools act TX uuOeI the command o. lIeI
i"aSrs vel al The members Of The conspiracy whether
oct ug It. superior or an inferior part II o1tu ~
guItS ~ lao jury. equally naoe A. to 'ne apPor-
foIilt 4 tie punishment, the Court, o. eouse us,9
its O,, rctio1 and may MAKE dhortoe . Kr,,y
leaders and led. The Court dld not agree ial i!
was al essential part OF the cOh'pIdcJ, odt 'Ay" be
that the verdict "Ga CONSISTENT WIN INC he'I8 "a Mt
indictment. He would be gaI no"t'el, 10 n,fe snn'
Henkr present AT failure time an argument III sup
por of ni- motion TO Sc side the verdict ana to sup
por his arguments by aihdtyi's M henHig pfGlns'd
t. do So then PROCEEDED 20 argue hat uhtl thS mo-
PENDANTS should b. released Oh bail.
discussion a. 10 the Iacuce III lhe District OF
Columbia courts, ana there was great diversity OF
04 ,- il, he course Of nis argument. said that
lis cas-. 4. 10 o. carried up 90 The Superior court.
Ihe Couf.-Incre Is "a doctrine about " gong .urther
anu ilr. worse" bat expect to 90 further and fare
lir Acs goeny chen went to app al to De court 10
hail tue Jlttc con -4tou OF IllACl