Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1882-10-04

WorhS, l.. d. Jdnney, +. w. brOOKS, Geo.
H. Eastman, Anthony Kelly, Hiram w.
Wagner and John I. Black, appellants. Oc-
tober II.
Margaret Shaber, administrators of the
estate of Henry Shaber, deceased, respond
ent, VS.. The st. Paul Water company, ap-
pellant. November IL.
Theodore Hamm and Phillip Thou, re-
spondent, VS.. The st. Paul Water company,
appellant. November ID.
Hubert Lohmar, respondent, VS.. The
Minneapolis q st. Louis Railway company,
appellant. Appeal dismissed by consent.
Gottlleb Schoewe, respondent, VS.. The
Minneapolis d Saint Louis Railway Com
pany, appellant Appeal dismissed by
consent.
G. F. johnson, respondent, VS.. A. W.
Fischer, appellant. November IA.
AZ. Lesher, appellant, vs.. Frederick
Beesmeier, R. E. Scranton and Herman
Mahuke, respondents. December -.
j. A. Jaggar, appellant, VS.. J. C. Wins
low, doing business under the firm name
OF Tousley & Winslow, respondent. No
vember 1.
d. Leonard, appellant, VS.. The Pioneer
Press Company, respondent. October 81.
William Meighen, appellant, VS.. Almon
King, respondent. Passed.
Andrew J. Smith, respondent, VS.. Daniel
A. Park, Co"nelia Park, ct ais, appellants.
October 20.
Alexander Bassett, respondent, VS.. Mi
chael Forth, appellant. October "a.
In the matter of the arbitration and
award between Charles Hegiund and Ar
land a. Allen, Charles Heglund, appellant.
October 10.
George F. Goodwin, respondent, VS.. the
Board of County Commissioners of the
County of Mower, appellant. Respondent
moves to dismiss on ground appeal was
not taken in time. October 4.
Warren Z. Herrick, appellant, ". Isaac
Root, Peter Gaynor, e. S. K. Smith ct ais,
respondents. November 2f.
Warren T. Herrick, appellant. VS.. A. B.
Barton, Jonathan Simmons, and William
Butler, respondents. November a.
The Johnston Harvester Company, ap-
pellant. VS.. George Clark, respondent. Sub
mitted on briefs.
Gustav Schlender, appellant, VS.. 81. B.
Corey, respondent. November IS.
Geor e A. Weston, as receiver of the
Farioauit Mlnu Mil Co., respondent, VS..
Thomas Ell. Loyhed, appellant. October 10.
Geo. Ross and Leo Aftermath. appellants,
VS.. Henry Evans, respondent. Passed.
Smith O'Prien, respondent, vs.. r. J.
Mendenhall, implicated, ETC., appellant.
October %
Mary O'Neil, appellant, VS.. John O'Neil,
and Dennis O'NeiJ, respondents. Novem-
be- 8.
Henry Westeman, appellant, vs.. Henry
Erumweide and Frank Hill, respondents.
October 90.
Mathew Oxborourgh, respondent, VS.. Will
liam Bosser, appellant. October %.
Eliza G.. B. Calkins, and Annie Brewer
Cough, respondents -. Mary Copeiy. and
Julia c. Veazie, implicated with Others, ap-
pellants. October IS.
Edward R. Perkins. respondent, VS..
Clara B. Morse and u. R. Morse, appel
ants. October %.
The Farmers Nat. Bank of Owatonna,
appellant, VS.. Dennis Moran, respondent.
November J5.
In the matter of the application Of pro-
bate the last will and testament of Fannie
Mousseau, late of said county, deceased,
Minnie MOusseau, contestant, and Henry
Mousseau, David Mousseau. ct. ais, in
ventors, etc J. appellants. October IL.
The State of Minnesota, appellant, VS.
the st. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba
Railway Company, respondent Novem-
Der s.
John Peter Young, appellant, VS.. Charles
z. Davis, respondent. October 81
Warren Smith, appellant, VS.. JOHN Deid-
rick Ell ais, respondents. November II.
Orrin Z. Spear and A. G. Austin, CO.
partners as Spear q Austin, respondents,
VS.. S. P. Snider, appellant October g.
James I. Jelletts, respondent, VS.. The
st. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Rail
way Co., appellant. December Il.
Benjamin F. Sherman, respondent, VS..
The st. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba
Railway Co., appellant. November %.
James w. Williams, appellant. VS.. NJ. E.
Matthews, respondent. November II.
Eliza McNally, r. ,pondent, VS.. Luther
r. Weld. adminisSc: or of the estate of
Thomas Garvey, q ceased, appellant. Oc-
tober 10.
State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. VIM.
McGinnis, appellant. November 9.
S. J. Nelson, respondent, VS.. the Chicago,
Milwaukee and st. Paul railway company,
appellant. November 3.
Myron Shepard, appellant, VS.. c. 81. Pet
tit and Elizabeth B. Syme, as administra-
tors, etc., of the estate of David Syme, re-
spondents. November 20.
Myron Shepard, appellant, VS.. G. H. Pet
tit and Elizabeth B. Syme, as administra
tors, etc., of the estate of David Syme, re-
spondents. November 20.
Patrick NOLAN, respondent, VS.. Edison R.
Smith. Michael Doran, and Patrick Bray
(Doran q Smith appellants. Submitted
on briefs.
Orrin Kipp, appellant, VS.. Caroline W.
Billiard and Cad Buiiard, respondents.
Submitted Oh briefs.
Julia Papko, respondent, VS.. Gottfried
Papka, appellant. Submitted on briefs.
Stephen B. Lovejoy, respondent, vs..
Levi NJ. Gaskill, appellant. November
90.
James Weaver, appellant, VS.. the Mis-
sissippi and Rum River Boom company,
respondent. Continued.
David Adder ct ais, partners, as David
Adder & Sons, j. Oppenheim & Co., and
L. Newbouer & Sons, respondents, VS.. Jen-
ME Apt and Ralph Rees (Ralph Rees), ap-
pellant. November 1.
Emma B. Ransier, administrative of the
estate of Albert II. Ransier, deceased, re-
spondents, VS.. the Minneapolis & st. Louis
Railway Co., appellants. December Ii.
Edward Fay, respondent, VS.. the Mime
| ~