Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1882-12-01
General Term of the supreme Court.
The General Term of the supreme Court
came TO an end yesterday frcuoon when tic
following decisions were announced:


Cases entered "wi'h the cour": NO !. spau
ding 1t al V. Drew a. al; No i, l1d 81 al Camp
bell ct all No. ., MosCCy V. Vermont Mutual FiC
Insurance Company; No. 10, Ferris. administrator
'. American Board OF Commissioners for Foreign
Missions; N0l2 American Board Of Comm
for Foreign Missions '. Ferris ada in!stratoIt al
No. IL, Chailee v. Rutland Railroad company NJ.
II, COry1on Central Vermont Railruut Company
No. Id, Bailey V. Troy ana Boston railroad Cuu!-
pany No % Flint ct al V. Johnson 1t al; No. -,
Vermont Valley Railroad ui l>'i V. Central N,r-
mant Railroad Company ct al No. -, Nj
leujy v. Bradford; No, 20, Bailey '. BAILEY,
81; No, 81, Clark V. Chelsea ACADEMY: No 30.
stevens v. Pillsbury, At. al. No rs 1empltiun y
Montpelier M. Is, D0iy, aimn>tlI'Or, y. iiup
bard No. 20, Dew Y sutton; No. u, Mrgndy
Y. Curricr No. 40, Palmer, Ct al, V. Perry 80
u, lanolllc Valleys E,seN COUNTY EallruIl COM
pany y. BlNhy No. Is, WctAsy. morrill, No. 49,.
Cheslty No 81, taho9h % rrecnbanhs No. o..
~. bloomsbury Lake CHAMPAIGN hl.ilUdi COMPANY
v Hunt. No, %, Hastings e. Al. V, HYDE Fl. al. /;
no. "a. Bacon v. Bacon, Ct al. No, 10, Trim \
Bailey Y. Vermont Life Insurance Company ; No.
-, Ionahuc MuLdly Y, Windsor County Mutua.
tur Insurance Company Mo- -, klmhill =. Bo--
ton, concord Montreal haroal Company No.
=, 'c tlusky. Ct al. '. Gleason, administrator.
m" Judgments IN the following cases were lc-
ven ,',i NJ. ., quinn '. llancu demanded No.
>, Z II, and \, Z. Miner y. sheridan demanded
van anlate No. . llaskln v liHsAin demanded
WIN mandate No. :, Rlch y. lgh .p,tt .uucr To
70 'icd IN AMI causc proceeded wHU; Ne. No.,
'l.i man q. l. "hs ct al reuandci and decree tu
'ntrl,'i 200. lciIupucu; No, i, ,Hilis Y. NAL
mlulc,D No. 20, WhlurN y. tust Nat6na Bunk
OF Il ,atllehOru (rrmAnucd) 80 -, McrhIu \ %.
y. Gerry Judgment iur defendant rtNtl,rd ana
judgment f0r plantill ; No. 80, ,titk y. Downing
\rrmdudeh) NJ. 30; MinsLlp a. al \. Waterman
(remindcdy; No, -, swan y. swan ct al demanded
with mandate No. So M'lrs Randall 40 ri re
mandcd with mand,tr, aud the same cniry was
made III Nos. 81 and 50 NJ. 81. Ross v. Shur,lcii
lrcmiulel and decree ior0 a ur,,
Judgment IN the following cdscS was affirmed (:
No. 10, DAVIS, AdinN, v, Central vermont railroad
company ; No. H. Brownell, V. Troy and Boston
railro al company No. 23s, Bowman V. Blown CT
al No. ~, Boutwell, V. Mlswell No. u, knccland
Lumber company " Bailey ct al (iiilrmed aud re-
manded) No. 5S,Morse V. Hollis No. 80, Clifford ct
ny V. McCOle No. 10, Darling V. Norcruss No.
bury No. 81, Cheney v Ryegatr No. 90, Siltcv
Ryder No. ~, Morse v. Bishop; No. ~, kimbll
V. woodruff No. s54, Brock V, White No. Isl
lutchns " Kmball No. 50, Falland e,
uN v. severance No. II, Dale AMI Robinson Vt
Tyler No. ~, State v. Murphy Judgment on ycr-
diet. etc.l; No 50, siatey. WmtcOmb Judgment
on verdcD No. S, Durant V. Pratt et al (lecree
affirmed and remandcd) No, ~, Jewctt ana Reed
v. Dieter; Guernsey V. II. and NJ. Kendall (hearl at
last general term, and decree Diminishing bill was
remanded.)
Several Judgments were rendered as follows No.
~, llalbert '. quinn (petlton dismissed without
cost No. S,6, Clark V. Downing (pttitiOn dismiss
ed with costl No. 9S, STATE V, Moves QnotiOn Ia
dismiss the indictment graniedl.
Several of the cases on the docket were
continued by agreement, and all cases that
were not heard were continued. Several OF
the cases were discontinued by agreement.
The court finished its business and ad
journcd at noon