Morning journal and courier. [volume] (New Haven [Conn.]) 1848-1894, 1882-02-16

extend to the company would not be abused. |
Finally the whole matter was temporarily
abled.
The corrected report of the board of rail
road commissioners was submitted by Mr.
Owen, of Manchester, who moved its refer
ence to the Railroad committee.
Insurance-Favorable on amending the
charter of the Holland county Mutual fire in
surance company tabled for calendar
Cities and Observation-Disclosures bill relat
ing to sidewalks in New Haven; favorable on
annexing part of town of East Haven to New
Haven; favorable on establishing borough
of Shelton, tabled for Calendar adverse on
amending the charter of the borough of Will
mantle, rejected and petitioners given leave
to withdraw.
Judiciary-Unfavorable on House bill 278,
authorizing creditors to require disclosures
from debtors, rejected; unfavorable on House
bill No. SO, introduced by Mr.. Cleveland of
Brooklyn, pensioning judges of the Supreme
and Superior courts, rejected; adverse on bill
relating to public health and safety, rejected;
| unfavorable on bill relating to the suppression
of fraud, rejected; unfavorable on bill relat-
| ing to civil actions, rejected; unfavsrable on
| bill relating to the property of married women;
| adverse on bill relating to the appointment of
| conservators; substitute bill regulating the
renewal of of limited partnerships; favorable
on bill repeating act concerning the property
| rights of married women, tabled for calendar.
! Education-Favorable on validating action
| of school district at Brooklyn, tabled for cal
endar; favorable on accepting annual report
| of the State Board of Education.
rporation-Favorable on granting the
petition of Sarah Woolsey for incorporation
| of missionary association; unfavorable on
| amending the charter of the Essex Turnpike
| company; rejected.
A resolution was received from the Senate,
recommended by the Finance committee, and
passed, authorizing the Governor to appoint
commission to visit Washington and urge
| upon Congress Immediate action in estab-
| fishing naval station at New London, and
| also appropriating 81, 900 for defraying the
expense. The.immediate passage Of the res
olution was urged by Mr.. Bingham, of Wind
ham, and Mr.. Ripley, of Norwich.
Mr.. Northrop thought the resolution was
| intended not SO much to affect legislation at
| Washington as it was to influence legislation
| in Hartford
Mr. Robertson, of New Haven, said the
resolution was not in any way designed to
| influence the bridge question Both bridge
men and anti bridge men were in favor of its
| Immediate passage, and he trusted it would
go through under suspension of the rules.
Mr.. Sill, of Hartford, was not opposed to
its adoption. .....
Mr.. Mahan, of New London, supported the
measure and thought its passage would con-
serve the public interest.
Mr.. Root, of West Hartford, moved the
previous question, but withdrew the motion
to give Mr.. Cowles, of Pennington, oppor-
tupity to speak on the question.
MIR. Cowles said the resolution had evil
IDENTIFY been sprung upon the House. He did
not think the members were prepared to vote
Immediately on the question, and days de-
| lay could not result to the injury of the
State. He therefore moved that the resolu
ton be tabled. Carried, 1O5 to GO.
the House adjourned at 1905 until II a. m.
Thursday -.'s