The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1882-01-26
More Pearson-BradIey News.

The Pcarson-B Bradley scandal was the
main topic of conversation throughout the
city yesterday. Even the muddy streets
were forgotten for the time. The topic be-
came more interesting when it was whis-
pered around that Mrs. Pearson had left the
place, No. III Good street, where she was
stopping, for another, on account, il is said +,
that the family objected to having any
party connected with the scandal an inmate
of their house. 1t still increased in interest
when 1t became known that the officer
who made levy on property claimed by
Mrs. Pearson, for the benefit of creditors of
the firm of the imam milliner,n had dis
covered among three piano-stools, one-a
very tine and new one--on the bottom of
which was the following inscription: " From
A. A. Pearson TO Miss May Edna Bradley.
Commit no error"
The Times yesterday evening published
the following:
j. Bradley father of May Bradley say
that each and every allegation set forth in
the HERALD Of the 10Th, relating to said j..
Bradley, or his daughter, receiving money,
to his knowledge is false, and that lie who
saws 30 is labonng under false impressions,
OF is dastardly liar, poltroon and coward.
j. BRADLEY,
Father Of May Bradley.
As the HERALD's and other reporters con
nected with the investigation OF the news
In the Bradley Pearson scandal had prose-
cuted their labors with unbiased feelings
and impartial motives, anu had been un-
usually careful about what they had given
90 the public, the above card imposed upon
them the necessity Of further publication.
Accordingly ar. Fred Cullen, who had
been prominently mentioned IN the Times
article was called ON last night, and hc
gave the following for publication
To the Public
Inssmuch as NV name has been used in
the report published today in the Dallas
Times, m connection with the Pearson
Bradley scandal, / deem Il my duty 10 my
self, the public, and all parties concerned,
% make the following statement:
] was not al the bradley residence the
night the purchased furniture was called
iur, and when the dilicnity occurred, OF on
any other night. Nor did / give my check
i0r the purchase money OF the PEARSON
furniture, but the purchaser Of the goods
did in the sum Of 500. i, a. agent for the
purchaser. called tie following morning
aud demanded the goods and asking for
any bills owed the Bradleys By the FEAR
-ofis, that the same might be settled, as
Bradley asserted a private arrangement ex-
listed that must be settled before the goods
sb1uld be moved. The goods are stall at
hradleys house. Yesterday Mr.. Bradley re-
cIred from the purchaser SD cash, 10
close Up the business. As regards the 81
- transaction a. DeuisOn, Mrs Pearson
81 ID. iu my presence and in the presence of
go trs. that ii va paid az heretofore pub
ll.lel Deb tie HEnsLD. And ! informed
l,-aiIer ard bis daughter. 40 their hOme.
-l.af Mrs Pearson lad told me this.
i. CUILEE.
Iluua-T 11ih. iss1
Dr.. C1'len iuf .rmel the reporters WHO
.rn-d on him tllaI. from fIe facts De
= f1ssIssel di. BE- considers the article in
.ls urnaLu ofvesterLlay morning as correci
nd arcasiinrIr mild that ten tImes more
.1uil llaFe been said and n1t have gone BE-
rfril fIfe frufhfhaf D. vas nlt The only one
Uarr 90 fhs frunslctilus. a. others we're
rIssasalf of ini1rinsri11 tllf - become
iuhIic trfk in connection ulth sandal /
ARR file atore card hsi bee Srnsd. be /
SLED t1 mind and gave the reItTiers pr /
r.ssir1 fo nee. en- ndliti0nnl F.rt 81 what /
I n Iarrsrn had told him. q The efeci /
IIat rfter fls c1rlF-uruist 20 Den s1n. ans I
Ter re1Etins Dallas. her his ana hsd o.