The Canton advocate. [volume] (Canton, D.T. [S.D.]) 1877-1897, 1882-02-02

knOWltOn VS. COnneu, judgment tor
Plaitif.
Knowlton VS. Costello, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
Nelson vs. Cline, Judgment for Plain
tiff.
Adee VS. Hanson, Continued.
Burdick VS. Burdick, Decree.
Hogan VS. Hogan, Decree.
Vanderwood VS. Vanderwood, continued
Sandwich Manufacturing Co. VS. Han
son, Judgment for Plaintiff.
Benedict VS. johnson, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
Carpenter VS. Clark, Judgment for
Plaintiff
Carpenter VS. Smith, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
Voegei vs. Voegel, Continued.
City Of Canton VS. Huetson, Co. Treas
urer. Judgment vacated, leave to answer
given, and demurr filed to complaint.
Lien VS. Alness Settled.
Cuppett vs. Gallup, Continued.
Kennedy VS. Minot, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
Hughes VS. Fry, Judgment for Plaintiff.
Sycamore Mtg Go. vs. May, Settled.
Van Brunt Go. VS. De Witt, Continued.
Mccormick VS. Hornbeck, Continued.
Aultman 4 Co. VS. Lunder, Judgment
for Plaintiff.
Winsor VS. Hornbeck, Continued.
During VS. Davis, Continued.
Copgard VS. Paulskie, Continued.
Sycamore Mfg Go. VS. Odell, Continued.
Sycamore Mfg Co. vs. Lee, ct al, Con-
tinued "
Sycamore Mfg Co. VS. Connell, contin-
ued.
Carpenter VS. Sutton ct al, continued
Carpenter vs. Morris, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
County VS. Slack ct al, Referred to tax e
testimony.
Linington VS. johnson, under advisement.
Williams VS. Gillen, continued.
Case & Co. VS. Madden, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
Aultmsn 4 Co. VS. Jorgenson, contin-
ued.
Nelson VS. johnson, Judgment for
Plaintiff
Carpenter VS. Mason, Judgment for
Plaintiff
Watervane VS. Benedict, continued.
Cummins ct al VS. Benedict, continued.
Knight vs. Knight, Dismissed
S. G. & D. R. r. Co. VS. Fitzgerald,
continued
Carpenter VS. Nichols, Judgment for
Plaintiff.
Barnes ct al vs. Carpenter, !under advise
ment.
Aultman & Co. VS. johnson, settled.
Sycamore Mfg Go. VS. Wood, co ntinued
Aultman & Co. VS. johnson, continued.
Clark VS. Meade, continued.
Carroll VS. Southland, continued.
Wood Reaper Co. VS. Connell, continued.
Barger VS. Kerly, continued.
Hammer VS. Gale, continued.
Halmack VS. Cas- Mfg Co., continued.
Pattee vs. Southland, continued.
Seymour & Co., VS. Hornbeck, judgment
for plaintiff.
Carpenter VS. G. NJ. & St. P. continued.
Boynton vs Fodness, referred
Boynton ct al VS. Odegard, referred.
Boynton VS. Wilcox, referred.
Miller VS. Tenant, verdict that neither
recover.
Everhart VS. Everhart, decree.
Lyman VS. Sogn, continued
Booge & Co. VS. Haraldson, continued.
Carpenter VS. Handschiegel, continued.
Carpenter VS. Nash, continued.
Smith VS. Carpenter, Judgment for
Plaintiff
Steensland VS. Baker, continued.
Madison Mfg Co. VS. Tuntland ct al,
continued.
Williams vs. johnson, verdict for de-
fendant.
Jerauld VS. Austin, referred to referee
to take testimony.
Moe VS. Bokhoff, under. advisement
Smith VS. Gillen, continued.
Powell VS. Anderson, Judg't for Plff
Arneson ct al VS. Falde, Kennedy allow
ed to intervene.
Denna VS. Russell ct al, Judg't for Plf.
Union National Bank VS. Thompson ct
al, continued.
I'll. VS. Carpenter, three cases, continued.
Knowlton VS. Tate, continued
CRIMINAL CAUSES.
Territory VS. W. Charlotte, dismissed.
Territory VS. Wahl, verdict, not guilty.
Territory VS. Mansfield, dismissed.
Territory vs Naylor, venue changed to
Minnehaha county.
The principal case, or cases that excited
the most interest at this term of court was
the Naylor matters. Upon the call of the
criminal case for trial the defendants
counsel interposeda : motion for change Of
venue upon the grounds that fair and
impartial trial could not be had in Lincoln
county on account Of the prejudice Of the
community against the defendant, which
motion was based upon afhdayits. The
Court granted the motion, and venue