Arizona weekly citizen., 1882-10-22
Court Report-Judge W. W. Hoover,
Presiding.
 WrnNESDAY Oct l9


 WEDNESDAY, Oct. l9.
 U. 5. vs. Luterio Graiads, on motion uf 5. Ainsa counsel for defendant, Fitch, and Anderson were hdded as associate counsel. Leave gtapted to withdraw the demurrer filed October I7tl and file new demurrer. Time to argue demurrer shortened to this day. Argued and submitted on part of the defendant. Continuation of argument to be called up on one days notice by
 Bv order of the Court c. II. Day, a ,7itriess for the Territory was allowed SIP ,n accordance with section oi statutes providing for same.
 Ah Gee was sworn as the Chinese Court interpreter to act m all cases ID which Lls services are required.
 Territory of Arizona vs. Philip John son, Sraud larceny. Trial resumed cOun- sel Tor defendant asked the Court to ad- yise tue fury to bring iu verdict of not cull,T, which tho Corrt thereupon did. The jury brought ID verdict of not guilty as 1T tructed.
 E. II Wool was for good cause shown excused as a trial juror for the remain der oftEe term. 1hos. Gates was for same reason. excused till Oct. 20.
 Territory Of Arizona vs- James A Hor- ton. motion for continuance for tns term denied and exceptions taken: By order ot the Court, witnesses for the prosecu- ton were allowed as expenses S23 each.
 Logan ct al. vs. Wofiendon, motion to dismiss the appeal continued Tor farther argument and motion to continue case, argued without prejudice to motion to dismiss.
 THURSDAY, Oct. 19.
 An Sing vs. Chan Tin WO and An Fol vs. Chan Tin Wo. It IS stipulated in open Court that the defendant have till Saturday Oct. Dist in which to answer.
 LeopoIlo Carrillo, administrator, ys. Jesus Navarro. This case came regular dy for trial. Fl Gervais, A CyEyans and Ieopoldo Carrillo were sworn on the part of the plaintiff who introduced a deed from the city of Tucson to himself. also the report of the commissioners ap- pointed by the Probate Court to. dls- tribute the estate of Jesus de Carrlllo, and decree of Probate Court on said re- pOri setting aside the premises de scribed in the complaint tO said Cerrlllo, aHRthe deed from hIm as trusted to self ss administrator of estate of sad Jesus de Carrillo, all proof being ID for plaintiff and the defendant having no proof It Is ordered that the plaintiff have judgment in accordance with the prayer of the complaint.
 Territory of Arizona vs. Jose OrIas, larceny, stealing cattle. A iury was empanneled, the indictment read to them and defendants plea of not guilty stated. After the examination of the various witnesses the case was given to the jury without argument After being instructed the jury retired. On again coming into court they brought m a verdict of guilty. Time set for passing sentence Saturday Oct. 2l- George Bowles as a witness in the case, was, by order of the court, allowed S42 Tor eX pcu,es, and Chas. King. witness Tor the Territory III the ease of Philip John son was by the same order and the same cause allowed SIS.
 It Is ordered that the second lndlct- men. against Jose Urias be passed to be called up by the district attorney.
 FRIDAY, Oct. 20.
 it is hereby ordered that 1t stand as a rula O.. ,n.s Court that the affidavit of all applications for contiuuances in civil acu0Is shall contain an affidavit of merits.
 It appearing that Billy Green and Pat Mah1uey were not lu attendance, an at- tachment was issued forthwith for their appearance.
 Geo r McIiuire witness on behalf of the prosecution In the ease Cf the Territory vs. Jose Urias, was upon order of the Court. allowed S3S.60 for expenses. For same cause shown, James A Fish in the case of the Territory vs. Theodo e Lopez, allowed Sl3.uO for trayeing ex- penses. D H Thompson, witness in the ease of the Territory vs. Jose Urlas, S2O.3O with which to pay bis return fare.
 Territory ot Arizona vs. TeoIOra Lopez. indicted for attempt to commit murder This case came regularly to trial; after argument the Court ln- stracted the jury on the law of the case and they retired for deliberGtiOn. On again coming into Court they brought m a verdict of guilty. lime set for passing sentence October 2lst. Prisoner was ramanded to the custody of the SherIiL .-'
 The United States Grand Jury came into Court made partial report and then retired for further deliberation.
 Copies were ordered issued and placed in the hands of the United States District Attorney for the arrest of all persons against whom indictments were found not in custody.
 n II TLrv,punn witness nF fine Territory vs. Jose Urias, was brought into Court on writ of attachment but for good cause shown was excused from contempt of Court in not Obeylng the subpoena.