The Evening critic., 1882-07-21
THE LIAR LET In.
Continued From First Page.

drawn. Tho reason that he did not do tho Same
way rs before and draw through Lewis John.
con & Co. he thought was that tho bankers
did not want that much New York exchange.
That loan has not been repaid. Tho witness
made General Brady another loan In July,
1850, OF between 10000 and $4,000, In Dol
rnonico's, Now York. II was given in cash,
md no note was taken. II was some money
that no had at the time In his pocket. He had
carried IL around day or two. He could not
Tell where he got the money from. Ho did not
recall any ono paying him money while In
New York. That loan had never been paid.
That ended the loans.
walsh Confess.s Ills Periary.
Ho had not found the telegram from General
Brady directing him 10 deposit $4,000 10 the
Generals credit on Now York. The motto maxi
ing the same request he could not ind. The
entire credit that General Bfadywas entitled
10 was $4,000.
Paper shown by Mr. Wilson,
.Thnt ~ the account" said the witness.
"Hero is an item," said Mr.. Wilson, 0Jauu.
ary z, 1880. Cash loaned, 81 200"
"That is clerical orror," said the witness.
pressed Mr.. Wilson.
~ believe It TO be- resumed the witness.
no you swear n.y. continued Mr.. Wilson.
~ don't think II was there when made the
statement 10 my clerk" replied the witness.
"Is that your signature?" said Mr.. Wilson,
showing him the anldavit
"rhat is," said the witness, after examining
Mr.. Wilson then read the bill.
"Do you now say that $1,000 is clerical
~ think II Is a clerical error. sworo TO
II IN New York. No, am mistaken; did not
swear 70 Il In New York." hesitatingly
aYou swore that IL was $1,000 ms tead of
$4,000, did your put Mr.. Wilson.
al have done so, but It is mistake" re.
piled the witness.
SLOW do wo know whether you swore cor
rectly thou, or that this is correct p asked Mr.
swell, this Is moro rigid and less .parto
than In swearing In tho other way said tho
witness,
Moro OF WaIsh's Perjury.
The note OF j. b. Price, for $1,000, Senator
Kellogg gave the witness for Brady. The
Gflidayit did not show credit of $500 to
General Brady, although no had sworn that he
gave Brady credit for it. After midsummer,
1881, no did not loan General Brady any
money, and the Indebtedness did not swell
any. He brought an attachment suit against
made an u1ldavlt ut that time.
hS AZ, eS1 1,d No, not 9 "A recollecs whether
| $4,000 or $4,000 subject TO tho credit. At
| that time he had not discovered that Con.
| eral Brady was entitled TO more than 5000,
Ho did not know enough about his account
with General Brady TO furnish tho informa.
| ton 10 his lawyer in New York without send
| Ing TO Mr.. Hinc, his attorney here for the
Items.
His account that he furnished Mr.. Hlne for
his suit here, no made up from his memory.
| sent to Mr.. Hlne for the data Ho did not
| know what had become Of the paper.
Mr.. Wilson here produced n certified copy of
the papers filed In the New York suit which
were read.
1t showed that the witness had sworn to an
AFFIDAVIT that General Brady owed him $40, 371
over and above all counter-clalms.
Welsh az II Swift Swearer.
| The witness testified that the swearing was
| nero prefunctory matter. 1t was only u
matter OF form, and the client generally swore
| to what his lawyer wrote. Il. II. Grandln Is
| III Now a
amount OF the Indebtedness anu the amount
| OF credits, and the witness ,swore TO the bill
| counter.claims.
| Whom no brought his suit here no swore
that General Brady owed him $4,000 In the
| aggregate, and IN New York It was over $40,
| COO, as he swore TO 1t. Tho difference was
| over 81 900 and he could not account for 1t,
| except that he made errors
Three Swears at the Same Thing
and All Different.
| "You had three swears at this thing. Once
IN tho supreme Court In this District, once IN
New York and once ON tho wltness-stand here, .
said Mr.. wilson, (which is correcti"
| have questioned me.
| Continuing, tho witness said that no had an
interview with General Brady December 2S,
| 1850, which was brought about by tho witness
He, perhaps, wrote the note in tho hall aud
gave 1t to the boy. He did not recolcct scolng
General Brady In his room on that day. Al
that time the witness ofilco was 016 L street;
Postoface to sheridan's offlce. General
| Brady never came to the office OF witness, but
was In the habit OF going to Sherldan's office.
| The witness had made arrangements to have
| fire made, so as TO have General Brady there.
He took his notes and memoranda thore, and
| went Tor the purpose OF having settlement
with General Brady. He had two notes, one
for $4,000 and tho other for S13,5O0. He
kept them in his pocket at first, and afterward
| put them out on tho table.
The note was headed "December, $780,"
said tho witness, and he lxd the date of the
2sth OF the month because 1t was previous to
that General Brady asked for a loan OF 800
shares OF Chattanooga stock.
THE note was hero shown and was without
He had no other way of fixing the timo.
Walsh Loses His Grip AS u Swcarer.
Envelope with December %, 1880, marked
on 1t shown.l He did not know who put the
ngures on the envelope. He might have done
| IL, but he would not swear to It.
"Suppose II should turn out that from Do
cember 20, 1850, TO January 8, 1881, General
Brady was not in Washington" said Mr.. VII
son, what date would you fix then for the
al should say" answered the witness, ''tha,
he was here, and wanted TO prove an alibl."
| Witness and Gen. Brady sat in the room fol
awhile, and the conversation after half an houI
or so reverted to the settlement, and the notes
OF Con. Brady, which were lying on the table
| were finally picked up by General Brady, who
folded them up and put them into his pocket
Witness asked him what he meant by that ant
what he intended to do about settling the debt
Ho said he considered the matter settled, anC
| that was an end OF 1t.
His story About Brady's Carrying
OF the Notes an AftertiOught.
He never told Mr.. Hine when he went to brinJ
suit against Brady; that he carried OF tn,
| notes and did not say anything about It. HI
did not tell his lawyer In New York of 1t. Tn
report In the New York Herald was very incor
rect, Walsh said.
At this poidt the court adjourned until Mon
day next.
Political Points.
The Texas Democrats completed thei