Morning journal and courier., 1882-02-11
The Court Record.

Superior Court C1V1 SiOe - JuuSS
Beardsley.
This court came in yesterday morning at
10 o'clock
The following divorces were granted dur
ing the day.
Harriet Amelia Sweet from Frederick j.
Sweet, both of New Haven cause, intemper-
ance; married March u, 1877. Petitioners
name changed to Harriet A. Alling.
Anna Fredrika Dammann from Louis
Dammann, both of New Haven cause, in
temperance; married July IA, 1872. Petit
fioner's name changed to Anna F. Meyer
At a bar meeting in the afternoon the fol-
lowing assignments were made:
Tuesday, Feb. 14.-Raphael VS.. Raphael,
Especially Watrous VS.. Watrous, Especially !;
Russell VS.. Bristol, (nisi); American Mutual
Life Insurance company VS.. Bristol, nlsl
Wednesday, Feb. 15.-Pine Grove Gene
terry association vs. town of Derby, (n1sD !;
Security Insurance company VS.. st. Paul
Fire and Marine Insurance company.
Friday, Feb. 17.-Cox VS.. Cox.
Tuesday. Feb 21.-Morris VS.. Peckhan |;
Merchants Elk. National Bank vs. Wetmore
(nisi; Clark VS.. Clark.
Thursday, Feb. 23.-Trowbridge VS.. New
Haven Davis VS.. Davis
Tuesday, Feb. 2S.-Townsend VS.. Antho-
nv (special); Rowe Hardware Co. VS.. Catlin
1nisi9 I,eete vs.. Leete (nisi); Guthrie vs..
Wheeler; Mrs Malley's Appeal; Miss Mall
ley's Appeal.
"Wednesday, March 1-Aimes' Appeal (nisi);
Wells VS.. Sperry.
Court adjourned until Tuesday morning at
10 o'clock.
Superior Court--Crimtna1 side--Judge
Hitchcock.
This court adjourned for the term yester-
day Over one hundred cases remain on
the docket to be disposed of to come before
the April term, which will come in on the
first Tuesday in April. The first few days
will be devoted to what is termed by the
court officials as the 'jail delivery" after
which it is probable that the Malley boys will
be put to trial.
Court of Common Pleas-Judge Torrance
This court came in yesterday morning at
10 O'Clock, when the case of Everetts VS.. Hull
continued on trial and will probably last for
several days to come. Mr.. Hull, of Madison,
acting in his capacity of deputy sheriff, levied
an attachment on a certain schooner and he
is now sued for about $500 damages, the
claim being that he did not take proper care
of the vessel while in his custody, 80 that she
became worm eaten and otherwise untitled
for service on the water. Some pieces of
wood, full of holes made by the teredo or
other insect of the sea, were exhibited to the
Jury. The defense say that the schooner had
reasonable care, but was not in good condl-
ton when attached by the officers.
At bar meeting in the afternoon the fol-
lowing assignments were made:
Monday, February 13-Gay vs.. Catlin, Sill
yer VS.. Welton.
Tuesday February 14-McNamara VS.. Don
ahue, Rohan vs.. Carroll, Lyons VS.. Dunn,
Ryder VS.. Lucy ct al
Wednesday, February 15-Whittlesey VS..
Moore & Goodrich, Barnes & Son VS.. Kenne-
dy ct ux, Rohan VS. Maggie, Ray VS.. Finni-
gan. ;,
Thursday, February 16-Evarts VS.. Hull
Especially, Trumbley VS.. Mcbride.
Friday, February, 17-Williamsburg Color
and Chemical company VS.. Bradley, Andrews
VS.. Northrop, Sheldon VS.. Mcpherson, same
vs.. same.
Tuesday, February 21-Bennett, Sloan u
Ward vs. Hammond ct al.
Court adjourned until next Monday morn
ing at 10 o'clock.