The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1882-01-26

10 vim IN ihia easo, was nn ine0mboienf "
n noes ~ establish ". Unfl h0 should
nOnn0o hlg appointment and nFm ~ Gu
\ nv nq executor hO WIS iutofHfrd Nv N
7 OVtrnt NJ 00fuulfH1ng and statutory cGf
pggtlbns Reversed and rcmnndcD
! WHlkrr q.
Lindsay Va ianray n. nj from Coo,
county. The court trying The case withou
10 Jury, found from the evidence that IN
heirs sold the certificate by virtue
which the land was located, twcni
years prior ~ their quit claim decd
10 another party, conveying the lam
. itself There was some cyidenC
that the transfer Of he certificate was II
writing, but 10 was not even necessary to II
validity that II should have been In writing
| - Tex 2H. The patent TO the land issu
| ing 10 the original grantee, opposed out
standing title must must consist Of til,
equitable title uhe purchaser or holder
of the certificate in this easel and de
PENDANT in this case not showing him
seli-connected with it, cannot plead 1t in
defense. 80 Tex. 52l. The court, 10 defeat
recovery, will not regard q possible,
though doubtful, equity. 30 Tex. 52J Plant
IFS in this case bought the land from the
administrator of b., the equitable owner,
under an order of the Probate COnrt paid
G,kad In 1871 Tho District Court cyer-
;,,aJio,ia,, .lo.oJ 81, H. al
~ ~ P Pc, ia &c nr,Tart, ~ 800
~ 'A so,,,a 'o-nd Jatondout 80
~ saiiio rho" doa al" 70 ,,in;mtir Pu,s
not then on record. But held, that the land
had passed by the first sale from the control
of all Probate Courts, and the District Court
iiau ~ IuitIui0sUn onui ~ ~ H.,
uoWii VIZ ny oh oi,G suoosi; e
heiIs testiheu tnut tliey SOU viie ceItl.icitg
III 1927 anu o9JetCeion thereto was oVerruIeu
III III t'io Saouni' ti"t ~ "aS Iot IA mii'llS'
Ilelu, e.ioi, puV 'iiuv Mitlioue tiIlS lestI
l,ionS 'Heio va; d IuliH,t"V ~, TiiooioV W
SUSAN ING oscJr uhasiei' No ii iand ''oeI
T s",o /, oonnfr T %"+ tho %ood i "a tho in
tyI5 !" III LAZY r tti W. 'n,o -; !.
testatc, a,'o aii tinoiueii'S ~ M sno"eu II
- ~ III y; Co''mvy az" iuv'aci,iuu psi
tiVely as tHe lanu III controversy. lel9I
tno ooeShio ior that th Is ip r TGii
t9hen t th % oituu ~,
naiHti ii', and Defendant is well taken the
plaliiliIl aia 10 mcii '.Hei, yiio
Irle e. w ,,T ~ ,'o AM
III tinS ,iiI TeiLe 10 '''o' ino'''
olntIWlse 15Lliiiieu; p mJlNet, n,l, Co,,
lt'S vs., DIanoS " I'm
Pahy, lIoIl DlSHo9 oouilty' ms SUI. "a9
,oT recovery VI d it,Ig an, Gi "Guou,'t VI
tolIs, nii" H w., iHIt t F Wy
t,o, ,rr,,,,i,,cr ont ~ ~ n tronSoctior II on
lees Growing out VI 'Ie tIailsoctioIi' ~ up
nears tliut ttiG itoinsv was ,Iaue uPI, oO-
Suita5ioti WIN a'toImeIs' WON uhe Grle no
anu f. thouSnC were ms put VINO III lacI
were t4e aIt9rntys ol .Le appeiI.esih Il; re-
Gnleu ms p[olse On HsttItal'I,Hs olis iact;
i luili ia'S'Io .4iI' 10 v9tolPcu
iellal. me YOU Mas lEc vi VIC attothGyS
IN anoln?r SUIT ileiu, tillG pelis Iouiiue9
upon l!ilstaHc' t nS l'nId'lor Va eetaPpeI
ioes iioC apP ~ M ~ pieI 20 VI e. 10
lle[S ete 90 M % - ieA, 49,,
% icy 10 anu - %D uGC;ce was
erroneous because the lliI unctloil WLllch was
sraiiteu was l1oI asheu VI p[aseu lor Al .nie
ne!ItIoil: anu oecause ~ was p!e.l'atGre
4 unGtl'n 10 PreIunt Nioid'ioh VI "a d
lranChlse Ml!l 2illE ne s aanuct WHeIi 'ile
party seehlhS rellel Is III PosstsslolI' LUG
menu reNerseu anu re''ia'iueu ioF "PPcil'i''
Ouinaii,c' CT,
" Il heeu vs.. vi; heGu, neAV IrleI'u, elc'
rom bell county. 10 cohstltute an e!ul-
ape esl topper, the aGI OF stutellieilC nlusC |
be SHOWN 10 nave hau uirGct or lnlmeui-
aye influence pom ne GoIiuucV ri ri the parry
flaming liS behehtS. Inc lues-
.loh was whether any parI Oh
.ract OF Ialu conveyed 70 uPPeinIalI Mas
truSI Iot tle aPpeIinues: OH n, tnls
POINT ll1e eVlieice Wuscol i!lictlnS. lHc pc
itlpl aliegeG ,he c"maerSio H. % tiio rus,
lhu apPllc'!Ion vi Part VI 'llt iuiios 70 we
purchase Oh -aholhGr 'rIGt, WHICH uelehu'
mt subsequently sod me court charged,
~ substance, that II me jury peiieVed that
'he luh"S SO invested; OF any PalI lhercoi, |
was ueclarcu ny IL. t::,, hGtu 10 DC
me money {" pia iI i.l lor Tn nom
nc was liiNea'lnE' any ulp invest ~, anu tuuI
u was oi thG proceeds Oh the orlglhal tract
'2nVeyeu, men ne WAS , tEslopPe st 3y lls |