Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1882-04-04

Cour, adjourned Monday afternoon,
having been in session two weeks. The
following case. were tried. in addition TO
those previously reported. |, should be
understood that some Of these cases were
tried before the Court. and did no, 90 TO
ths Jury A professional lawyer would
be aware Of this fact, BY the report but
we understand that some persons, not
familiar with Cour, business have been
surprised 10 see 90 many cases reported,
and so few verdic;s rendered;
No. SOL. FraAklis " Mayo v. Richdrd
y. DOrmaa.
Suit on account annexed for uinety-nine
days labor OF plaintiff and minor son, as 4
carriage ironer, in the season OF ls'6, In
which account the plaintiff claimed 10 re-
cover ai(y cents per day for his sou and
600 per day for his own services all
claimed amounting TO $3.50.
The defendant admitted the time, also
the price claimed for boy, but claimed that
plaintiffs services were not worth 81 90
per day, and that no price was agreed up
on; also tha, be had paid plaintiff all he
owed him on private account. Plaintiffs
COUNSEL finally admitted certain payments,
but claimed they should not be allowed on
plaintiffs private account but should DC
included In a partnership transaction
which subsequently, existed between the
rpits.
The case was given to The jury al about
ave 10 the afternoon and they were out I'LL
len in the evening, when they returned s
verdle; for plaintiff for SO o. 1t is IN
derstood they did no; allow The plaintiff
TIE 81 80. per DAY.
Swasey 4 Gibbs. Bisbee lierssy-
Nn. -. >rrIh ). Z. GrIy y. Th.aG'
r. Dag.
Petition for review OF an seton which
WAS tried ., March Term, ISL, in which
s,erdict was returned for defendant. The
petition Is based on newly discovered evil
deuce. and on the alleged statement that
sreCeipt that WAS introduced at the for
msr trial dated January 10, l>'s, was =
forgery The plsiutir 81 the former trial
DID not take the stand aud testify, and the
defendant showed that she had made the
receip, and had seen It before tri4l. She
attempted 20 show that she Wa not at
The place named In the receipt a. the date
OF il, but there was conflicting testimony
on this poiut.
Review denied.
Gibson. Foster.
Fourteen divorces were granted during
the term as follows:
DIVORCES DECKEnp.
N.,ild. Poor llbelsnt vs. Lorenzo ID.
Poor Custody Of children decreed 10 mo-
thsr.
Prinf.
sarah VI. Robbins IS. David \. Robbins.
Ludden. Randall.
Aim. c. Spears vs.. Chas d. Spesrs.
Besrce. himoall.
Em.line Stsrbird vs.. VIM. Z. Stsrbird.
Benson. Davis.
John n. Dorr N,. Georgia y. Dorr.
s-ssey 1 Gibbs.
John Ssayey vs. Harriet A. SeSvey.
walker.
Chas. A. Hill W. Flora L. Hill.
FOLSOM 4 Merrill.
Rosa =. Tumble Va. VIM. J. Trumble.
Custody OF child 70 mother.
Hastings.
Vim. +. Rounds vs.. welihs A. Rounds.
Whitman.
Andrew Twitchell vs.. Psrsls A. Twi,ch-
eli.
Foster Herrick.
Martha A. Swan vs.. David u. Swan.
Gibson. Swssey.
Adella A. Gleason vs.. Jos. II. Gleason.
Custody or children 10 libelsut.
Ludden.
julia NJ Severy VS.. Emery +. Seyery.
Custody Of child 10 lioelsnt.
swAsey Gibbs.
The term Was q very busy one, almost
every momen, was employed either in
Jury trials. or in hearings before the
1OQyt. Qc uOShcS 4Os AuAs Rca" S~H-
tanned SS7 continued cases 10 which were
added 1913 new entries, making S35 cases
In all. OF the continued ones lis were
disposed of BY verdict, default, nonsuit
or neither party, and 81 Of the new en-
Iiss were similarly disposed of, making
in al l64. This leaves 81 cases for
the September docket, an increase Of SO
cases over that Of March.
Geo. W. Ty,herleigh Of West Paris
vas naturalized during the term, making
two new citizens, with the one reported
in a previous issue.
W. have reported all the Jury trials in
full and such Of the other hearings as we
obtained. Several cases were heard at
odd times when the Jury was not en-
gagged, and some of these may have been
omitted.
The .uounfaiHeer, published by v.
v. Twi,chell. a. Gorhsnl, y. H., enters