New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-03-22
THE COURTS.
BISHOP HARE ON THE STAND

hare, yesterday, statement Sister IizZio
NOW Mrs Cleveland was read Sic stated that in
August. 1872, az Yankton Agency, in going through
dark passage SIZE seized around the waist by Mr.
Human. Who in spite OF all her struggles, held
her fast and kissed her, ele believed, abonr
six times. She was adtated BY the that
the only thing she could say "Wbat would your
wife say If she knew what you have done !" Mr. Hin
man replied 81 love you much az my wife" Tho
statement contained an account OF similar occurrence
which happened later. The Rev. John g. GOsman said
In his deposition that lie had known air Inman about
ten years He had heard many reports against Mr.
linman's character from many different sources. re
told Bishop Hare that he lad doubt the cbargs
was true; fat Mr. Hnmans Conduct was notorious. On
crossexainaton he said that certain paper drawn ~
by Haley Fiskc, Mr lpmans attorney substantially
correct but ne retractcd any portion OF II which
Inconsistent with his testimony. Nr
Ishc and Ir. HEman sudd My 10 lis house. AID
Mr Fske put a scle. OF questions to him. without TEL
irg him the object u them In this staemn mt he de-
cl1res that he never tod Bishop Hare that Mr. Humans
mmoralities notorious that his character
any way bad. On further examination he admitted tfas
bis relations with Mr. Human pccaliar He hal
adopted one Of his children. BisiCp Hare had always
spoken 10 him Of the charges against Mr. Human vita
expressions OF regret and sorrow.
Bishop Hare then took the testify in his own
behalf lie had had knowledge be said that he wasa
candidate for Bishop until the day Of his election In G.
gard to the confirmation service held Immediately aier
his arrival at santee, and referred to in Mr. Humans
pamphlet, he said that MIR. Human did speak
TO him OF the confirmation class until few minutes be-
fore he time for adTc IT, He told Mr. Hinman tha
he was not prepared TO address The class, and had no
idea Of confirming the members Of IT, However to AVOID
scene" he confirmed the members. He afterward
bnked Mr.. Human for not giving him the notice r.
CURED by the Of the Church true thai
lie said TO Hr. Hnman: :" 1 desiring peace. bnt
prepared for war" Wien he spoke 10 Mr. Human about
the charges against him prior TO the investigation u
1873, he said to him; The first thing your soul.
II have done these things you ought confess Mr.
Hinman said lou have no right to talk to ia this
way long as am uDcondemEcd" The Bishop replied
that the conversation entirely Informal Mr. IInman
declared that he stood upon his rights clergyman
The Bishop expressed surprise that Mr. Hinman shouli
want the scandal Of rial. He did not tell Mr.. Human
that there place Of refuge for him except at tbe
foot of the mercy scat did he There is moth
ing for you t. do but leave the mission and away" 70
not that nc told Mr.. Hinman that 1t would be
useless to deny the charges against him. nor that he told
him that he Hare would stay in the house twent -four
hours and that he Iinmanl must g. his anil
confess. After Mr.. Hnman was acquitted upon the n
vestigatOn in 1873, Bishop Hare he'd Thanksgiving
service ut santee and announced the result OF the inyes
gation The next unpleasant between Bishop
Hare and Mr. Hnman happened ut the aters table Mrs
Human remarked that the Rev Mr. Riggs had expressed
strong desire to make the acquaintance Of the new
Bishop Bishop Hare aid he shcuid be glad 10 meet Mr..
Riggs Mr. Hinmar spoke up: 1T must be some rhere
else than in my house. Bishop Hare after dinner tod
Mr. Human thai be considered his remark insulting;
first because h. was his guest; secondly. because hs
Touse was under hi charge and DID belong to Mr.
Hinman and. thrifty. because Il was an IIngehicmlny
rnmark. HiF Human said in effect that his relations
with Mr Riggs unpleasant In regard 10 The loan
Of $500 to Mr. Human Bishop Hare said ho odd Bishop
WhiDpe that Mr. Hnman was exceedingly careless
ahout money matters, bnt dld not speak OF tho
T29 g in Tnro6s he frsGuey wrote to Tr Human aon:
the money. he needed il. To mos Of the lters he
sCt no als"'iIi a''n ,e - aiEc IT NJ, tftn,oen
money when Mr.. Huinau's wiz" was i'll, he secured
OF Missions and Nj, Hirmqn received this extra stipend
fer about two years. He had uniformly rejected me ri
70 Fnrone In Drceuber 1875 He ALWAYS defended Nr
Human when anyone spoke 10 him aoout snch rnmor-'
Iyr had done 50 IN the OF MI COwcn G. E Cox Mr..
Riggs. Mr.. DOrsey, Hr uaryn and mally others Iie
had a conversation with the Rev Mr. Heemans' an In
dian IN 1877, follows: Bishop Hare-Fhese reports
* I'm inSt y,eev dsconr"eei Vow want you 10 III
Hinran" Mr.. Heemans-"w When I spoke 70 you before
made made me mr afraid ' Bhop a yoGr Bishop I'D
have right TO know WHIT you thak insist upon y'r
telling me" Mr. Heem9ns-'I haye ms'er seen any,
thing myself but the ChIitian geople are al very I'd
and want another minister" The Inhans Ros@ ri
Bishop Hare was riding day in 1877 IN BostoG in
street car with Bishop WhipPln whor.t his mont. ~
against SIr. Hnmen again rtte. He must be v"Iy.
mpraae3t man bo t ipT Sion ''I In Hf f1 ..
TO the conversation with Mr.. Human about Mss
Hare said he was his when Mr. Iinman,
companicd by Miss West me to him and said he wa.
hal denied his engagement to her. Bishop Hare sad:
- What do you meant Do Won mean TINT yon are en-
gagged that lou have been Engaged ald have broken
engagement or that you have been attentive TO ter
and afcrward drawn back or what 40 yoa inca ,
TG and am M cone 9bsr 10 9gs dnrne he
to Justify Miss Kirbach This account OF the CONVERSE
ton differs rad lily from that OF Mr. Inman in his tes
mon IN he Hare gali
advised any way brought about the cOnyerNat n,
or inicrfcrtl in the matter OF the en;agcment Miss
Krbach came to HIM day and said that sermon =,
hal preached the previous sunday seemed D. drecd
at her. She We. made very unhappy by It ana rev. ygry
whether she could contde in him she was told $40
Mr. smith, on the part Of Mr. Hinman here inter
posed and declared dat the statGte Pcon,siteI
point was waved for The present ny III
Zach S"ih authorized 'f,Gn lin to tell Mr.: Human
Of her charge against hun. sta,cmsnt Of the chare
Mr. Smith objected on thc ground that IL arsidy APP
peared by The evidence IN the cas5 tHt 5AH HV IA
lowed 10 read it whcl SIZE sworc 10 IT, Tue court hIh
the objection not well taken wren was SHOWN tha nc
The statement in substance that Mr Human nal
used violence toward Miss Krbach, who Ind no, cled
cut because there no one near anc II would nave
been useless. On another occasion Mr. ihman came 10
her room and stayed about thirty minutes tic had one
away she did sleep oil night. for II came to her min
that she was in tie power OF man Mho a9d nS re- II!
his engagement 10 her and kissed and embraced Aet "a
the prescncc OF his sister. 49,.
BlsnOp Hare sad that he told Mr.. ilinman o. aiss
Kirbachs ch lrge when he dismissed hin ~ nl,sl'H
ary. Mr. Human Immediately tod the story TO Hls -
lends Bishop Hare told Miss k!rD3ch tAat 10 "oul ~
for her to leave santec. when Bishop mar W.
Mr. Hinman his letter dismissal, the latter ,ad "l
might ns well take ont and shoot me: sir hlila'
tbat the charges against him were va H'
Bshop Hare then toli MIN about Miss hirbach ne rps,
with his hands IN his pockets ana sAld ny. tu.s
isn,t so" Bishop Hare told Mr. Human that he m'Ss
leave the house in ten days, bat thar ms !,i'h1n
might remain long as convenience required IN
REGARD To Mr Humans charge that Bishop Hare nid
eYoyea his hospitality and treated HIM win irlendl'
mn o the very moment when he discharged hliu Tao
Rsbon said that he always stayed III his Journeys VIA
his missionaries and that there was 10 o'Iei Pr
Snntee where he could well have stayed Ia rsore So
to the administration OF the sacrament To the Roy VT
4 q