Daily Republican., 1882-12-13
SUPERIOR COURT.
oF THE ARGUMENT IN
Ib''' TEE ARChITRCT's
CASE.

oneued at 8 o'Olook yesterday
Couls CnoD and Mr.. Nields commenced
,tsiDUU ,tsiDDSUment for the plaintiff In th.
~. W rase by reviewing the case and
bHnITd bHIdsnce which had been adduced
W side He said this was a case
w. syidepce had been presented
flhs syidenoe, and oath against
su'M Mr., Weldln has testified to one
W. W, and Mr.. Thorne to another; he
BiISh H. a. he was not to pay for certain
y 'I and the other on his oath says
~ 10 Day for these plans.
MAIDS spoke about 20 minutes,
" ". allowed by Mr.. Emmons for
7, ,.t.nse He said that the two par
suold most diNctly interested where 80
.nwstTcally opposed in their evidence
lnUsb ~ 01aS but one thing for them to do
y " ,bst was to throw out the evidence
tS., .. ,,..d the different lids which had
y ,.csiyed for constructing the
IN Mr.. Weldin, and said that
os..ss the bid Of Strickland and
nSS l.SS, vas 81 800; 1t was less than that
M. lIsS', ahers, as he included In his pro-
y, VA N furnishing Of certain mate
Il, Thorne's bid was made in q
IIss ..,., md had such conditions at
S.J !S..sJo d that rendered 1t impossible
E.T, Wsldin to cor slider 1t. He con-
1aij by saying that he did not zee
~ tn Jury could fail with all the
s'rmTtsuCes before them, to render q
.'sa N favor of the defendant.
", IOre closed for the defense and
Sthst be could not see how the jury
~D throw out the evidence Of either
iAIss contestants.
n, propsr course for the jury to
I'M. @ would be to weigh the evidence
sITitted on each side, and then rem
y mali decisions accordingly. The
riNuCe had oonclusively shown that
sru not Mr.. Thorne's brains that
n bNn the means Of rearing this
1rtitul castle in the air, that had
40 beautifully portrayed by Mr..
HVs the old. old story that had
VI 20 often presented TO other iuries,
N, man of wealth rolling In his rich
\ I'D living in his han dsOme mansion
N his poor client crushed and OPP
sRd. He submitted to the jury
I'M Tborns was entitled to recover
rnhinV he certainly was not entitled
VrcsVs more than one, or one ana q |
hiper cent
NJ Nields said he had but a few
WIS to say in reply Of Mr.. Lore, aud
rld only Call their attention to q |
AHiaCts,
Hs compared the actions of Mr..
hyns and Mr.. Weldin while on the
Tinss stand. The first had taken his
L,s With a firm step, and In answer
tAs questions, replied yes sir, or no
d. Without hesitation. 1t tho jury
Mld examine these plans, aud then
AE Mr. Weldin's house they would
n that 1t was built according to
AA
hWntended that his client was en-
lid to recover, from the fact that the |
EMmeTt was II ThOrne had the con-
EnaiOu Of the house, he was to fur.
Hlthe plans free Of cost, but If the
aaCt was awarded to any one else,
y Mr,Weldin, TO use his own words,
kAGeei to pay him what was right.
H. Lore had said that Mr.. ThOrne was
mixed, he was not only builder but
N architect, but the speaker thought
dANtUO, Mr.. Weldin was the worst
mixed wh was not only q lumber
dealer, but was also trying to be his
)Wn architect.
1.-THE daWings aud the plans which
horne made are Incorporated in the
|l1S used by Rice, then ha should be
aid for them.
There was no doubt at all that Mr..
lsdin was seeking to obtain from Mr..
horne knowledge OF architecture,
. closed by asking of the jury & YER
\, with interest to the present time.
Ih'jury said that they would prefer
10 have the case submitted to them
y evening, and Court adjourned until
D morning.