New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1882-07-22
of Arahi Pacha saws:
THE PORTE AND THE CONFERENCE.

CoNsTANTINoPLE July 21-In consequence OF
resolution adopted at yesterdays sitting OF the con-
ference the Dragoman of the Italian Legation mas
informed Said Pacha President OF the Council, that
the conference had noted the Porte's decision 10
participate in the deliberations of the conference
and invited him to decide whether the conference
shall continue to sit at the Italian Embassy or he
transferred to his residence. 1t is expected that the
Porte will propose a counter scheme to the effect
that either Turkish Commission shall accompany
the English and French troops, or that the Europe
ans hold the Suez Canal while the Turks operate
elsewhere.
LONDON. July 21.-The Times also says: &" We
understand that Masurus Pasha the Turkish Am
bassador, yesterday tried TO convince the Govern
ment that the answer of the Porte to the identical
note Of the Powers regarding the dispatch of
Turkish troops to Egypt might be taken to imply
willingness to dispatch the troops, but it Is difficult
to reconcile any such construction with the terms
Of the dispatch itself"
The correspondent of The Times at COnstantinOple
says: The proposal discussed yesterday at the con-
ference that the protection of the SueZ Canal he
intrused to England and France i'll OnjunctOn
with Italy, emanated from England. There Is no
question of permanent protectorate. All that Is
aimed at is efficient protection over the canal until
order has been reeStabllShed."
Assym Pasha, formerly Minister of Foreign
Affairs. has been appointed sole delegate To the
Conference.
EARL GRANVILLE ON ENGLAND'S POLICY.
LONDON, July 21.-A long dispatch from Earl
Granville, Foreign Secretary, to Lord Dufierin, the
English Ambassador at Constantinople dated July
IL, is published After justifylng the bombardment
of Alexandria, the dispatch states that her Majes-
ty's Government now see 10 alternative but re-
course to force to put an end to the intolerable
state of affairs in Egypt. 1t would be most in ac-
cOriance with the principles of international law
that that force should be that of the sovereign
power. If this is mpracticable on account or he
unwillingness of the Sultan to act, it
will become necessary to devise other meas
ures. Her Majestys Government continue to hold
the view that any intervention should represent the
united action and authority of Europe. They have
in fact interests objects in regard to Egypt in
consistent with those Of the rest of Europe or of
the Egyptian people. Their desire is that the nav
igation of the canal shall be unrestricted that
Egypt shall be well and quietly governed free from
the predOmnatng influence of any single Power !;
that international engagements shall DE Observed
and those British commercial and industrial inter-
ests which have been largely developed i'll Egypt
shall receive due protection from outrage. This
policy has been consistent They have Loyalty kept
their engagements with France, and have been anX-
suited on all matters materially affecting the posi-
ton of the country. The action, which their Ad-
mlral has been compelled to resOr. TO- has not al
tered their views.