The weekly democratic statesman. [volume] (Austin, Tex.) 1871-1883, 1882-05-11
THE COURTS.
Supreme Court.

Chief Justice, X. ). Gould: Associate Justices,
NJ. ii. Bonner, j. W. Stayton;
Clerk c. S. Morse.
]. A. & II. p Maurice VS. Sarah A.
and b. II. Greene; appeal from Bexar
county Judgment affirmed. Opinion
by Stayton, ].
S. Deutsch & Co. VS.. l.. w. Allen; ap,
peal from Bexar county. Judgment
affirmed. Opinion by Bonner, j.
Aaron Wolf VS.. Emma II. Mahan;
appeal from Williamson county. Re-
versed and remanded. Opinion by
Gould, G. j.
T. j. Newman VS.. B. F. Dotson ct al;
appeal from Washington county. Sub
mitted on briefs of both parties.
Sam w. Bigham VS.. Talbot & Crop,
per; appeal from COmanche county.
Submitted on briefs and oral argument
for both parties.
L. & n. o. railroad vs. Martin White;
appeal IRON Tom Green county. Sub.
mitted on original brief for appellant
and on additional brief and oral argu,
ment for appellee.
M. A. Hardin VS.. J. H. Randall ct al;
error from Hood county. Submitted on
oral argument for defendant in error and
on briefs for both parties.
Rachel Morris VS.. +. IL A. Geise ke
appeal from Washington county. Sub
mitted on briefs for both parties.
j. II. Farrar VS.. w. j. L Lee and
wife; appeal from Ellis county. Set fol
Friday, 18th instant
II. & T. G. railroad company VS.. S.
NJ. Nichols; appeal from Washington
county. Set for Wednesday next.
Court mt cts at 10 o'clock this morning
F. ID. Jodon ct al VS.. city of Bren
ham 4; appeal from Washington. Sub
mitted on motion to advance.
John ii. Hutchings ct al VS. T. c. Jor
don ct al appeal from Somervel. Sub
mitted ON motion for certiorari, and OIL
motion to dismiss.
| H. Il T. c. railroad company VS.. S. NJ
Nichols appeal from Washington. Sub
mitted on motion TO advance.
L. j. Newman VS.. Il. +. DOtson ap
peal from Washington. Submitted OF
motion to give precedence.
Tacitus Clay VS.. heirs of Nestor Clay
appeal from Washington. Submit, d oil
motion for rehearing on motion to dis
miss.
A. III. Rippetoe VS.. heirs of Nesto
Clay error fIOm Washington. Submit
ted on motion for rehearing on motion t,
dismiss.
A. Stehling vs.. F. Moehle error from
Gillespie. Submitted on motion to dis
miss.
ii. & T. G. railroad VS.. Louis PHILIPPE
appeal from Travis. Leave granted ap
pellant to withdraw transcript
Stinson & Barre vs.. b. F. King ap
peal from Shackelford. Submitted OF
motion to dismiss.
L. l.. Thornton VS.. A Z. Lowry
error from Comanche. Submitted OF
motion to dismiss.
w. s. CarrotherS VS.. Ben. Longley e
al appeal from Burnet. Submitted oil
motion to correct transcript.
w. III. KellOy & Co. VS.. A. M. White
appeal from Washington. Submitted Oh
motion to dismiss.
A. J. Giasscock VS.. John Schell ap
pei fIom Williamson. Submitted OF
briefs and oral argument for both parties
| j. G. S Morrow ct al VS.. w. III. Steven
son ;appeal from Williamson. Reset I,
heel of third assignment.
J A. & III. p. Maurice VS.. S. II. & b. ii
| Greene appeal from Bexar. Submitted
on briefs and oral argument for both par
ties.
| Leon & II. Blum VS.. ]. A. Wassenicl
& Co; appeal from Guadalupe. REESE
| for Monday next.
| Il. Z. z. Wright VS.. Blackwood
Frazier appeal from Travis. Reset TO
Monday next.
T. L. p. Wright VS.. Blackwood Fra
zier; appeal from Travis. Reset TO
Monday next.
II. ID. Jodon VS.. city of Brennan ap
4 10 "A
vance cause and give same precedenc
| granted
JohnIHutchings and Mary S. Jones VS.
L. G. Jordan appeal from Somervel
| Appeal of Mary S. Jones dismissed.
ii. IL L. 4. railroad company VS.. S. M
Nichols appeal from Washington. Mo
ton to advance granted.
I. j. Newman VS.. B. F. and M. r
Dotson appeal from Washington. Cause
| given precedence.
A. Stehling VS.. F. Moechle; error from
Gillespie Dismissed.
| T. III. Barre and S. F. Stinson VS.. B.
F. King; appeal from ShackelfOrd. APP
| peal dismissed.
l.. l.. Thornton VS.. A. Z. Lowery
error from Comanche. Writ dismissed
| w. s. Caruthers VS.. Ben LongleY
appeal from Burnet. Motion to correc
transcript overruied.
W. Ii. Kellogg & Co. VS.. A NJ White
appeal from Washington. Motion tC
| dismiss referred back to counsel fol
briefs on points indicated by the court.
Allen Hines VS.. Susan w. Thorn ct al
appeal from Young. Submitted OF
briefs and oral argument
d. B. Grigsby ct al VS.. Mary A. May
appeal from Dallas. Submitted on brief
for both parties.
The following cases were submitted OF
briefs and printed argument:
d. B. Grigsby vs.. Walter Caruth from
| Dallas.
d. B. Grigsby VS.. w. H. Bowles
from Dallas.
d. B. Grigsby VS.. VIM. Caruth from
Dallas.
D. B. Grigsby VS.. Jefferson Peak from
Dallas.