The Bossier banner. [volume] (Bellevue, Bossier Parish, La.) 1859-1952, 1882-10-12
Feeding Germ Smut.

The contradictory opinions entertained
by farmers in regard to the poisonous
qualities of corn smut and the current
reports of cattle dying from this cause
led to the experiment of feeding it to
two cows selected from the farm herd at
the University Experimental Farm, Mad.
ison, Wis. A report of this experiment.
given by Professor W. A. Henry and in.
corporated in the tenth annual report OF
the Wisco sin Dairymen's Association,
furnishes the following facts: .t+ ,.+'t
The cows experimental with We're botl
natives and about eight years old. One
designated as the ''red cow was farrow
and was being fattened for the butcher.
The other, a black COW, was giving about
five quarts of milk per day Both ami.
mails were in good condition. They were
placed in comfortable quarters. and al.
lowed two hours exercise during the
middle of the day. Each was fed five
pounds of bran morning and night and
what meadow hay they could eat. In
addition to this the red cow received at
noon each day peck of ears of corn,
chopped in small pieces. The smut was
saved by the men at husking-time and
all fed previous to November. Is was
carefully cleaned and sieved, in order
that ofar as possible nothing but pure,
clean spores should be fed On and
after the 18th the smut was prepared by.
simply freeing it,from the corn-stalks,,
leaving it often in lunches of considera-
BILE size. 1t was fed dry mixed with
bran, half in the morning and half, at
night. The smallest amount of smut fed
on any one day was six ounces and the
largest amountisiXty-four ounces. The
experiment began November 10. l,-aEa
The red cow was a greedy, huge
feeder and soon accepted her quarters.
The black cow was nervous and more
uneasy in her partial confinement.
November 16 the black COW refused to
eat all the bran and smut mixture, leav-
ing about two-thirds of it. For couple
OF days again she ate it all, and then.
grew so Indifferent that she would scarce
~ taste it, and on the twenty third day
OF the month was turned out with the.
rest OF the cattle as being smut proof. /
The red cow ate all that was given TO
her and seemed to thrive freely, when a
sudden change came. On the mornipo
of the oath sheirefused her food, but al
that time exhibited no signs of pain. At
nine O'Clock she was found lying down
and soon gave evidence of great suffer
ing. Her temperature fell rapidly ard
at half past eleven o'clock she died. Her
symptoms during sickness were loss of use
of limbs; head thrown forward so as to
bring nose on a line with back; hard
breathing and groaning; spasmodic con.
fractions Of the body; horns and ieys
cold, the latter stretched out stiffiy and
hoofs rafting when sliivering; some
frothing at the mouth, from which also /
flowed quite quantity of Thin yellow
ish fluid. No faces passed after she Law
down, but passages had occurred during
the night. The excrement was some.
what watery and of a peculiar blacklist
color.
In an experiment on this point by Pro
fessor Gamgee, under the direction OF
the department at Washington, smut
fed when wet produced no ill effects, and |
when fed dry at the rate of thirty-six
ounces per day caused the cow to lose
flesh. No other i'll effects followed.
With these experiments Professor
Henry concluded it is fact that COWS
are liable to die suddenly and without
when they eat smut in large
quantities. He also believes it is quite !
evident, too, that smut is not an active
poison in moderate quantities. In
word, he considers that the principal
danger from this cause lies in turning
cattle into stalk fields, where they often
gorge themselves with dry. indgestible |
corn fodder and smut. Professor Gam
gee recommends for animals sick from
this cause some purgatlve, as a pound of
EPSON salts or a pint of linseed oil for a
grown animal and to induce the animal
TO drink water as soon as possible. NJ
Y, World.