Daily Los Angeles herald., 1882-04-20
Supreme Court-April Term.
IN BANG.
WEDNESDAY, April 10.

W StPtaA iOa
Court met pursuant to adjourn
ment.
Prese: Hon. r. F. Morrison,
Chief Ju tice; Associate Justices
Mckee, Isoss, Myrick, Thornton,
SharpsteiD; Wheeler, Department
Clerk.
The class of applicants for ad-
mission to practice appeared and
were examined by Hon J. r.
Thornton, g., as to their quail
fications and learning in
the law; and such examination
proving satisfactory it is ordered
that
l. Henry Conner, recommended
by c. III. Larrabee and VIM. A.
Harris.
2 John A. DAILY, recomme
by Fl M. Willis and J. w. Sat-
terwhite.
3 Edwin Parker, recommended
by M. A. Luce and Levi Chase.
4 w. J. Hunsaker, recon- mended
by Levi Chase, Thos. B. Bond and
M. A. Luce.
5 James A. Gibson, recommend.
ed by Byron Waters, A.. B. Paris
ard J. w. Satterwhite.
6. VIM. D Wood, recomm ended
by Paul Neuman and Columbus
Bartlett.
7. Holton Webb, recommended
by J w Winans, A. L. Rhodes and
G. E. Wilson, be and eeach OF
them Is hereby admitted 10 prsc.
tice as attorney and counsellors at
law in all the courts OF this State.
S,346. Loupe VS.. California s. Co.
R. r., ordered by Chief Justice
Morrison that the cause be heard
in banc. By consent, appellant al.
lowed to file brief in fifteen days,
with fifteen days thereafter to re-
spondent to reply; cause to be sub.
mitted thereup0n.
Court adjourned for noon.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Court met at 10 A. NJ.
Present McKinstry, presiding;
Mckee, ] : Ross. j.; Gross, Clerk;
Finkler, B.
1882. Stockman ct al. VS.. River
side L. and I. Co.-Motion to dis
miss appeal herein argued by
Waters for respondent and Willis
for appellant aud submitted. Cause
argued by Willis for appellant and
Waters for respondent, and ordered
that appellants have twenty days
in which to file brief, with ten days
to respondent to reply, and that the
cause be submitted upon the filing
of said briefs
People vs.. Garcia - Argued by
Hall for appellant and Attorney.
General Hart for the People and
submitted.
1920. Tihbets ct Tx. VS. Riverside
Land and Irrigation Company
Argued by Waters for respondent
and Tibbits for appellants.and SUBJ
mitted.
500 Meeks, sr., vs s. P. P. R.R.
Co. --Argued by r. FL. Chapman for
appellant aud Rowell for respon.
dent and submitted.
1856. Los Angeles County Bank
VS. Rsynor--Argued by Paris for
appellant and Satterwhite for re-
.spondent and ordered that appel
liant have ten days to file brief and
that cause be submitted upon the
filing of said brief.
Adjourned until 10 o'clock A. NJ.
tomorrow.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
The Court met at 10 O'Clock.
Reconsideration, g. J.,presiding;
Myrick, j., Sharpstein, j., Martin,
Clerk; Kewen, Bsiliff
1891. Southern Pacific Railroad
Company vs. Champion.
1893 Southern Pacific Railroad
Company VS. Garcia.
5000. Southern Pacific Railroad
Company VS. Bennett
On motion of Gould for respond.
ent ordered that these cases be SUBJ
mitted on the briefs now on file.
S09l. De Thomas vs.. Witherby ct
al Argued by Chase for respon-
dent,and Brunson for appellant and
submitted.
S13S California Southern r.. r.
Co. vs. Kimball-Argued by Chase
for appellant and Luce for re.
spondent and submitted.
1884,. Scranton vs. Begole-Ar-
gued by Luce for appellant, Leach
for respondent, and submitted.
1887. Lombardo ct al VS. Olivas--
Argued by Hupp for appellant,
Brooks fer respondent. Repellant
granted 20 days to file brief; APP
pellapt Is days to reply; cause to
be thereupon submitted.