The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1882-06-22
WHOLE NO. 1926.

Tor 1t. On the 9th or May Mr.. look
gave me whisky. | had been doing
little work for him, and | left it to
him what to pay me. I had owed him
20 cents before, and he gave me 25
cents more, and pint of whisky. l
bought pint of whisky from Souders
on the 9th of May.
Thomas McNurlin. probably got
liquors there two or three times. One
time laid bottle down and told Sou
ders to fill it. He did so, and took
it away and drank it-had no idea
what it was-I may have drank whis-
ky, or | may not-I called this whis-
ky.
Joseph Miller. Defendants have
been acting as partners since the Pond
bill took effect. Ibought whisky once
or more of them, during the month Of
May-got it two or three times
bought of both Of them. 1t is gener-
ally called whisky. -
Foss Dunn. This witness was evi-
IDENTIFY drunk, and tried to be very
smart. The Judge told the Prosecu-
ting Attorney that he might cross ex-
anime witness, as he was evidently an
unwilling witness. The witness
finally admitted that he had bought
whisky four times from defendants,
during the month Of May.
I'll. G. Miller. | am Probate Judge
of Jackson county. The defendants
gave bond under the Pond law. The
bond bears date May 6, 1882.
Elias Morgan. Have seen William
Faulkner intoxicated occasionally.
Faulkner has the reputation Of being
in the habit Of becoming intoxicated.
Have seen John r. Faulkner intoxi-
Gated, about the place of business Of
defendants. Has the reputation of
becoming intoxicated, Same as to
Blything, MeNurlin, Miller and
Dunn.
Daniel Faulkner. Have seen VIM.
D. Faulkner frequently intoxicated.
Have seen him intoxicated in the Vi
cinity of where defendants have been
doing business. William ID. Faulkner
has the reputation of becoming intox-
icated. Same as to John r. Faulk-
ner. They are my brothers. Same as
to Dunn and Miller. [ am Marshal
Of Oak Hill.
A number of the best citizens of
Oak Hill and vicinity testified as to
the habits and reputation of the per-
sons who had bought liquor from de-
PENDANTS, agreeing substantially with
Morgan and Faulkner
Verdict guilty. Powell for the
State; John L. Jones and Robert FL.
Jones for defendants.
State Of Ohio VS.. David j. Will
liams. Indictment for keeping a
room where intoxicating liquors are
sold in violation Of. law. This is an
other Portland, or Oak Hill case, and
the evidence was substantially the
same as in the case of Cook and Sou
ders.
Verdict guilty. Fined $50 and
costs, and sent to Jail ten days. Pow
ell for State, ]. L. Jones and r. FL.
Jones for defense.
Souders and Cook were each sem
fenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs
and to be imprisoned in the jail of the
county for period Of ten days. Each
was indicted individually for keeping
a nuisance, and plead guilty, and fined
poO Stuu COSIo tdCli, duu W NC LII pilo
oned in the Jail of the county for
period of ten days.
State of Ohio VS.. Emma Campbell,
This is the case reported last week,
where the jury failed to agree. De-
fendant, by her counsel, Moore and
Atkinson, and J. L. Jones, had the
plea Of not guilty withdrawn, and
plea of guilty of larceny entered,
which was accepted by the Prosecu-
ting Attorney, and nolle entered as
to burglary. Defendant fined SIS and
costs.
State of Ohio VS. Joseph Campbell
and Emma Campbell. Indictment
for stealing an umbrella and valise,
the property Of Mary Robbins and
Herbert Robbins. Plea guilty. Or
dered to pay fine of SO each, and to
stand committed until fine and costs
be paid, and to be imprisoned in the
county Jail for the period of one day.
State of Ohio VS.. Emma Campbell.
Indictment for stealing a dress, the
value of which was $14, and the prop
erty of Ida Smith. Plea guilty. Fin
ed 1913 and costs.