Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1882-11-29
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANK.


TUESDAY, November %, 1889.
6,2S7-Santa Cruz Railroad vs. Board OF Super
visors Santa Cruz county-Judgment affirmed
The Court.
Mckee J.; ayrick, j.; Thornton, j.; dissenting
l0,76C-People vs. Ye Park-Judgment and order
reversed and cause remanded for new trial.
SHARPsTsIN J.
We concur: MeKinstry j.; Ross, ] !: Mckee, ].
10. 7S2-People w. Helbing-Pe Petition for re hear
ing denied. BY the Court
S,6S6-CarroIl w. Beldcn-ordered that the iudp
ment heretofore rendered by Department. One
herein be and the same is hereby anDrovad onJ
Mckee, J. -'S'
S,440-People ex rel. Knight ys. Blandinr-Judr
ment reversed, with directions to the Court below
to enter judgment in accordance with the PRAYER
Il the plaintiff : CON plant MYRrcK. J.
stein, }.
s,o2S-,People vs.. Stephens Judgment and order
affirmed. Ross !
We concur: Myrick, j.; Morrison, c. j.. Sharp.
stein, J.
We dissent McKinstry, j.; Mckee, }.
7,469-Town Of Woodland vs. Stephens Order
dissolving injunction affirmed The Court
affirmed. TuoRSTnx /
We concur: Morrison, c. J; Mckee, j.; sharp.
We concur in the judgment: McKinstry, j.;
Myrick, J.
7,279--Norcross Va. Nunan-Petition to hear
cause in bank denied. By the Court.
DblAhIMSNT ONE.
The Court met pursuant to adjournment. Pres
ent-Mckinstry, J., presiding McKee, j.: Ross J.:
+. Gross, Clerk II. Finkler, Bailiff.
S,615-Barsolow vs.. Newton-0n motion OF Tread
well, and by consent, ordered that appellant have
twenty days in which to file brief with twenty DAYS
to respondent to reply aud that be submitted
thereupon.
s,5s6-Willard, administrator, vs. Archer-krvued
BY Lambert for appellant and Harding for respon,-
ent, and ordered that respondent have five DAYS in
which to file brief with five days to appellant TO re-
ply, and that cause be submitted thereupon
S,Bil-Green vs.. Odd Fellows Savings Bank-Cor-
tinued by consent.
s,6S2-occidental Building and Loan Association
vs.. Sullivan ct al-By consent cause submitted on
briefs on file.
S,6S7-Frazer vs Barlow ct aI-Same order
S,63S-Smith VS.. Eill-Same order
s. 3S-Csrroll VS.. Belden-There being no appear
ance on the part of appellant and no authorities ON
hle, It IS ordered that the Judgment and order
herein be and the same are hereby affirmed
S,6i5-Faris ct al. vs.. Merritt-0rdered that re-
spondent have ten days in which to file brief herein
with ten days TO appellant to reply, and that cause
be submitted thereupon.
Adjourned sine die.
DEPARTMENT TWO
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
Morrison, c. j., presiding; Myrick j. Sharpstein.
J.; c. N. Post, Deputy Clerk; Henry Finkler,
s,5s2-Mtchell vs.. Be"kman ct al-Argued bv
Cadwaiader for appellants and Catn for respondents,
Ob"OO 70. DeShtlail ct al.-SuDmltted
the argument in Mit ;hell VS.. Beckmsn ct al. $3.50
s,646-Capital Savings Bank VS.. Reel ct al2By
consent ordered that cause be submitted On points
and authorities on file.
S676--Estate OF Religion motion Of Baker for
respondent and suggestion Of diminution of record
herein, ordered that he be permitted to file amend
ment to record. Appellant allowed ten DAYS to file
brief respondent ten to reply ciuse to be then sub
mitted.
s,672-Dennis ct al. vs.. winter-Appellant SLOWED
twenty days to file brief respondent ten To renI,y
cause to be then submitted
Adjourned sine die.