Arizona weekly citizen., 1882-10-08

them in the case of John Murphy, | charged with murder, with the following endorsement: "We recommend that charge be referred to the next grand Ju- ". James H. Toole, foreman of the grand jury" The grand jury having i been discharged, thereupon the court Of | its own motion, without any other cause | than the foregoing ecommendatiOn of | said grand jury appearing or beIng shown, and solely upOn such recommen- dGuon, ordered that said defendant be | held in custody and that said charge ! be submitted to the next grand Jury. | Said order is made without prejudice | to any motion ou part of said detend- an, aside from said order, or any ap- 1 plicaiion looking to a remedy upon this proceeding, Co all of which the counsel [ for the defendent objected and their ob- jectious being denied, excepted to each of aforesaid orders Of said cOuTt. Same vs. reodora Lopez. Defendent pleaded not guilty Of the offence as charged. Case set for trial Oct. 2. ! Same vs. C. D. Poston, an assault with intent to commit murder. The defendant appeared ID court with his counsel, Mess 8. Earll. Smith and Ste ] | Case set for Oct. 9.
 Same vs. Pat Mahoney, indicted for robbery against one Pat Bohan. Given [ till Oct. to plead.
 ! Same vs. Pat MRhoney, three indict- ment for robbery. Case cOntinued till ! Oct. 9.
 , In the matter of defaulting jurors, H. Buehman, a adefaulting juror, was brought into court upon an attachment and 1t appearing to the court that he had no sufficient excuse, was fined Sl0 and or dered that he stand committed to the custody of the sheriff till paid.
 Same ys. John Il. Webber, this being the tune txed for passing sentence, he was brought into court and informed Of the nature of the indictment, and on be- ing asked why sentence should not be passed on him, replied that he had none The court then rendered its judgment to Wit: "That you John H. Webber are guilty of manslaughter, and that you be confined and imprisoned ID the TerritC- rial PenitentIary of Arizona for the term of five years" The prisoner was then remanded to the custody of the sheriff.
 Same vs. Leon Refugia, indicted for murder. The motion to quash this in- dictment was continued to Oct. 7th.
 The United States grand jury came in- to court, the roll called, all found pres ent and with the U. 5. Marshal made a partial report and retired for further deliberatiOn.
 On motion of Jas. A. Zabriskie, U. S. District Attorney, and on filing libel en- titled. United States of America vs. 26,67S pounds of salt" ltis ordered that a motion issue directed to all persons making any claim to said salt to be and appear and present said claims within five days from date of this order.
 SATURDAY, Oct. :.
 Max Ordenstein ct al vs. W. B. Sc tt, motion to strike out part of complaint granted ard twO-days given plaintiff t9 amend.
 Territory of Arizona vs. Teodora Lopez, case set for trial, Oct. l9 at 10 q. m.
 Same vs Alejandro, indicted for murder, having pleaded guilty of mur- der in the second degree was brought into Court and AscenciJn Rios and Car los Tuily sworn interpreters was h. formed of the nature of the indictment found against him and that the time Tor passing sentence had now come and was asked If he had any legal cause to show why sentence should not be passed on hIm. aud no sufficient cause beiAg shown the Court rendered its iudgment, to wit: That you Aleian- dro are guilty of murder Tn the second l degree, and that you be imprisoned in the Territorial penitentiary at Yuma for ! Ia s.F ala 10 m oner was remanded to the custody of the Sheriff.
 Vim. Zeckendorf vs. Jose GallegOs ct al, due proof being made of the default of the defendant, herein and of the matters alleged in the plaintiffs com plaint, the Court ordered that the plaintiff have judgment in accordance with the prayer of the plaintiff.
 Geo. 4. Cum vs Pima county. Upon the filing of the stipulation of counsel 1t is ordered that the submission in this case, made before Judge W. H. Stilwell, former Associate Justice of this Ter ritory, be vacated and set aside and that this case be again submitted upon the pleadiugs and proof already on the bill.
 Grand Central Mining Company vs. Thos. Fitch and Geo. Boyer. It Is stipu- lated that tue utdtlus ol thc Oiuoi to show cause and the hearing of the mo tiun to vacate be postponed to be called up on five days notice to be given by either party.
 l.. Zeckendorf S Co. vs. Santa Felici- tas Mining Company. Demurrer with drawn and l5 days given to answer. Territory of Arizona vs. Leon Retugio. Indictment for murder. Motion to quash same argued and taken under advise ment.