Grant County herald. [volume] (Lancaster, Wis.) 1850-1968, 1882-09-07
Brintwell. Lamb & Co " Q Tane

cl al. ddTiisnce, appear
James Barr VS. ii. Hanger. eft Al. on
firmation of Sheriff s Sale
Richard Burns VS. Joe Bantield. Tres
pass
In. re. Ass'nm't of ID. Block & Co. VS.
G. r. Laughton. Assignment
Luther Basford VS. A. w. Burnell.
Note
Henry Bugbee VS. Jesse Budd, Relief
JEFF Crawford. ct al. vs. j. NJ. Chand-
Ter, Appeal
JEFF Crawford ct al. VS. IL. ID. York,
Appeal
Maggie Canning VS. p. j. Delaney,
SANDER
Frank Darlington VS. Harrison Bell, ct
al, money Demand
Rufus Clark VS. James Milbourn, ct al
Foreclosure of mortgage
Holm Dunn VS. Edgar Darling, Appeal
Frentress Barb Wire Fence Co. IS
l.. NJ. Devendorf Attachment
Mary Gibson VS. W. Richards, ct al,
Damages
Mary Gibson VS. VIM. Richards, Par
tition
j. Nj. Gray vs. Thompson Bros, Eject
ment
Hattie Gulliford VS. Thos. Reeve, APP
peal
VIM. Humphrey VS. j.. E. Duncan. ct
al, Appeal
j. c. Holloway VS. ID. Ii. Budd, ct al,
Confirmation of Sheriff Sale.
Walter Hicklin VS. l.. ID. Ishmael, APP
peal
A. j. Hoyt vs. Joseph Lanernan, APP
peal
J. II. Hellman VS. j. +. Munger, ct al.
Note
In matter of laying out of highway in
Hazel Green, Writ of Certiorari
Lambert Huppeler VS. II. f. McNelly,
Foreclosure of mortgage
Frank Horish VS. Chris. Deter, APP
peal
ID. & j. Harms Us Chris Weiderholdt,
ct al, Confirmation of sheriff Sale
+. f. HoustGin VS. p. j. Delaney, APP
peal
Joseph lleff vs. James Ileif, Relief
Theo. kronshage VS. Oh. Mil. ~ st.
Paul Il. r., Damages
Theo. kronshage, Administrator, Us
j. Ii. Burris, etal., Foreclosure of mort
Wm. A. Kelley VS. Elias Medley, APP
peal
Z. Nj. kirkpatrick VS. ". ID. Kirkpat-
rick, ct al, Relief
Isaac Reyes VS. JEFF. Varrell, ct AL,
Appeal
II. Ludwig VS. III. Theisse, Attachment
Jacob Lutjens VS. Geo. Ruhl. Relief
ii. Leasman vs. Mary Novotona, ct al.
Attachment
j. Mclaughlin VS. Q. Z. Knowlton,
Dissolution of Partnership
Eliza Minhinck VS. Devendorf & Penn,
Attachment
Mary Il. Mills VS. Estate of Isaac Lord
deceased, Appeal
j. II. McFall VS. Martha McFall, etal,
Partition
H. Mittelberger VS. VIM. Mayo, ct al.
Land Contract
William March, ct al, VS. +. Thomp-
son, ct al, Partition
John Mullalien VS. NJ. ID. Crouch. ct
al. Relief
Richard Meyer vs. VIM. Moore, Con-
firmation of Sheriff's Sale
Walker McCord vs. Hamilton & Cole
Attachment
Mathew Martin VS. John Dunn, APP
peal
G. II. & l.. j. Mccormick VS. Jacob
Bonnell, Appeal
Nichols, Sheppard & Co. vs. Bowen &
Cawiey, Attachment
John McGrath VS. Mil. 4 Madison II.
II. Co., Damages
Martin Necollins VS. Michael Hubert,
Land Contract
Nm. Nelson VS. ii. ". Bowers. ct al,
Foreclosure of Mortgage.
W. II. Oettiker VS. &. N. Thompson,
ct al, mortgage
". j. Guam IL Co VS. David q Taylor
Money Den and
Anna +. Quirk VS. james b. Tindcll,
Appeal
Dwight Pa ar, Jr. vs. j. S. Townsend
eft al, Land Contract
Al. Palmer, ct al. vs. Joseph Guernsey
Dan ages
Elizabeth Pafford VS. VIM. Pafford.
Divorce
Phelps, Dodge q Palmer VS. Enoch
Miller, Note
Eliza pepper VS. Henry pepper, ct al.
Partition
II. Robbins vs. G. Mil. & St. Paul Ry.,
money Demand
James Reed VS. ID. z. Rowland, At
tachment
Rice, Borne q Co. +. l.. Robenson
James Reed VS. Parce & Russell APP
peal
J. H. Rountree vs. Tn. Chapman, In
junction
Wm. Reynolds vs. Henry Weist, APP
peal
j. Stark VS. X. c. Kelley, Certiorari
Thomas Stephens VS. Willon Shaw. ct
al, Foreclosure Of mortgage
Seeberger Il Breakey VS. |. Hodges, ct
al, Garnishees, money Demand
Geo. Strack VS. e.. w. Eastman, Re-
lief
Isabella Sparks VS. Ben. Mccormick,
ct al, Confirmation of Sheritf's Sale
". T. Scott vs. NJ. T. David, Contract
J.C. Squires VS. ID. Y. q NJ. Y. X. Co.
money Demand
Thomas, Ludlow & Roger vs. j. Stark
ct al, Appeal
Thomas, Ludlow Il Rogers -. Stark
ct al, Appeal
Thomas. Ludlow q Rogers ysJ. stark
ct al, Appeal
NJ. u. 'fiIlotson W Al. Palmer, ct al.
Appeal
VIM. Thomas VS. VIM. Burns, ct al,
Foreclosure Of mortgage
Winchester Partridge Mfg. Co. VS. II.
G. Kelley, Certiorari
L. Il. Wilson VS. G. +. Wilson, Fore
closure of mortgage
Town of Wingyille VS. v. II. Middle
ton. Injunctioni
G. 7, Whiting vs. p. b. Mcintyre, Ap.
peal
Wilson & Harriss vs. c. c. David, ct
al. Garnishment
r. Wilson IS VIM. A. Wilson, ct al.
mortgage
Chas. Vincent vs. Richard Brewer,
Note
Nelly Young vs Franklin Young, Di-
vorce
81. Zwicey, ct al, vs. Alex. Molly
mans, ct al, Foreclosure of mortgage
During President Arthur absence the
newspaper correspondents have been
r-e-organiZing his cabinet
Wanted-a candidate for ~ Lancas-
ter delegation. Must be Of proper age.
steady, honest and with good references
from his last employer. 10 the right
man a good place is offered.
The seventh district has an anti mono
poly candidate in the person OF MI,
Bailey. Ghe party is not q very lalge
one but threatens to prove q thorn Of
..4 .-w -