The daily gazette., 1882-07-18
ouT COLLEGE TROUBLE.
,sAN LET'S SOME LIGHT
Mr. MON M ON The SUBJECT
INV THINGS HAVE BEEN GOING.

IN ON IHE
rov THINGS HAVE BEEN GOING
p..nLs by the BOys-LOclSing q
High olu and His wife in Their Room
The Presidents sons i'A" "''
Enron OF THE GAZETTE In
~ nanrr an of Saturday last was hn article
IOa u1pJ pIP tRash Professor kelnnart'" 10
tU''', ,rustee of Delaware College, l do
aG' ! ,hn " artirle has done a great injustice
ihlllh tnn"rshle .,'s n man and scholar, If i am
y an nG,I, ,n1ge from what know and have
pOlr F" na5 l""5 an article appearing in the
Ecu, n,, hac,re II came into Its present pro-
filhIih '.b, nossession would not have been
rlrInS n. I,o,icin0. as it's subscription list was
"l.m a,.Ii iJ and read by so few persons II could
a.na s,lan injured any one against whom IL
~ na ",ote an attack But since 1t has
En, na live paper, with Its thousands of
,Ous 'n.;,ar. a and readers, 1t has become a
u.s,, u,s, of influence and the young men at Its
apdLaye reputation TO build up, and
sat at r,n ~l oDlr be done by publishing facts, a
aias vbAbthe article above quoted Is en-
"is rflo. Who its author WAS Is of no
s.,a,rpe now, an opinion with which /
N son will agree when am done. Your
sIs as; "A few additional facts were
a,nei a TO the secret meeting held In the
frton House, and while the report pub
.bJin the GAZETTE yesterday was pro-
Dupcpd the only correct one, the real tenor
me meeting was not fully given"
dj not, for some cause, get
.nar of the date that contained your re-
N. but can say If your report shadowed
|. last article, then 1t was but feeble
ot 10 tell what was done at that meeting.
atru.tee did want the representatives
the prss 10 be- present, so that the people
those servants the trustees of Delaware
lege are) should know all that was done
the board, and in the presence Of one
tesntaliye Of the press did make my
~, known to member of the board who
nptly LEFT me, but afterward came TO me
said Dean, you are perfectly right In
|ur urslggestion, but did not care todiscuss
kQuestion in the presence of the reporters"
then he said at is a matter entirely
u the board to admit or refuse the re-
her, ! am conscientiously convinced
81 acts Of the servants Of the people,
Der all and every circumstance, should be
Vie known, so that the employers can see
athe employed are doing. The cause of
meeting being called was TO investigate
charges made against Professor Rein
bin an article published some time since
tlr lOpiHg Acrs, and If possible to find
II real author, whom Reinhart had been
10 to understand was President Purnell,
hancle itself said It was vouched for
q Prominent member of the faculty.
iithis was true who was that prOmi-
mrmbcri That the article referred TO
hkr aud libelous no one who has read
An or q moment doubt. The article IN
Eapr says in speaking OF Reinhart
principal charge against the president
ayiy in discipline that cases of mis-
iact were brought before the facult
hhe, the president, took no action
N' Now right here let me ask the
nlly question. Was II not the custom
pr to Reinhart taking up his residence In
colege for the professors to take their
ps at Sleeping in the college for the pur-
+ Of having an eye on the behavior OF the
dents' While taking their turns MS
pre aud while one of the professors was
duty did not his wife from fear ofbOdily |
iin to her husband from the students, or
some cause, leave her home and |
during the small hours to her
band room in the college, and on this
,on did moi the students act Tin the |
lloh ol lheProiessor whose turn It was
prep III the college, in an outrageous
lheT listening the professor and his wife |
lrlr room We're not the students In
hallway with light making all kinds of |
tons hnlsess And did not the professor
ou' Z" bed look through the keyhole of |
listened door aud then see person,
y alllfd to the presidents family, on a
~ Nl'Il which the door was held fast
uol Tue professor report his case to the |
ar'l o the faculty.. If so, was any
~ ever taken in the matter by the
uHA Did mol the president question
"olt2,9f as 10 his certainty of seeing
,'"ns man twho was so closely con-
.' ' ai'll llie Presidents family) in the
wa! oi lhe occasion referred TO, and did
u' N9i,ssof reply that he put his eye
\, Nfyt9Ie and saw him by the light
Was Ia the hallwayi Did
UN nesideHt object 10 such
"f' lef the reason he had Ngone
o@ rye an it?" When these
b.. H'F are answered then It win be well
.,l lI''ssots i' haekcy and Wolf to answer as
,I;i IA 3oaf article, as Is there reported |
vsr %' ~ tllt following language ain
rEar 10 lhls DR. Wolf and Professor
X II, ss.,.s5,l "Stiied that there had never been a
no, sNt S, up which was not acted upon." |
s,5,. lolcssor Mackey, in behalf of the |
| N ., ai9't felcred 10 who was SO out |
bcnlri ,ile case to the president of |
sn,. 3 Il SO, was it ever acted upon |
tst 1,',,.ileit a,,,. was awarded the students
mlp.l aallase on common depepcyl
r,.,,i 'Iesr :, ,lltstions are anWered what can |
,o,',. ln tiiillk oi the statement made (as
III lTgI ~ reports it at the meeting above |
'WNE9J by the professors there referred |
bs,ii bii W Sas IL tleemed not necessary by |
hslYr'.M M - Trustees W here persons tertify- |
he wa, spr9i n'ii. sworn as Professor Heinhart |
IueIl "lilills to do, and yet President |
hyit a. 't5il ". beiore the body his sworn |
h a,o1, s,Hieilee ailee Of more reliable char
fn mtt. 'ne mere statement made by
tle ai, f presence of the board, / will |
h pg, augsllon " ofany member of the board.
laTt ,,, tue Presentation OF that sworn
A64 s%e siai i greater weight with them
ae.sr, ~ p. Re statements made by other
had +, Did Qnigg in his aflidayit DENY
hlbo l.. 99l 10 been for the information
tting a: w resident = Purnell the article
h, 5sa WI Professor Reinhart would not
albn published! Until he does do
and u, al' affidavit made by him is mere
and .E,l,,1 59l worth the notice of the trus-
ea Gta 9pould not, by sensible men. he
Want , q a..9t9asiaeration What the trus-
nciI HAM, NJ KNOW to exonerate President
Flylero ,,o', er ,ls The charges made by Reinbart
ncl', r',, y, not the weight given President
trring ,,,1 ,5,o,19sersation with Quige, by his
Aln' wba, sna admitting that there rev. Was ~ some
eaeat' '''al gn, he tQaigg) had stated a to e' the
ltue aGiat Safe Qnigs sufficient confidence
Tin 'ilI,s &,,m might be published. With,
Fp pabliplft paft would the article ever 1' have sve
bit SaGs",ae5 aasaa..55 This is the question i ma'f
nM5 5"eFed before can ai'