Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1882-11-23
SUPREME COURT.
In RANK.


MONDAY, November %, 1882.
s,375-Cross vs.. Zellerbach-In accordance with
stipulation on file ordered that this cause be con
tinued and set for argument on December Is, 1882
at San francisco.
S,6S3-Cross Vs. Zelerbach-S Same order
Reclamation District No. los VS.. Daniel E. Mar
tin-0rdered tina. appellant have ten days add
tional time from and after November a. 1882 with.
in. By the Court.
s,668-Condee Vs. Barton-Petit;on to hear cause
in bank denied. By the Court
7,296-Van Court VS.. Winterscu-Petiton to hear
cause in halk denied. By the Court.
7,S35-Phelan vs.. City and County of San Fran.
cisco-Petition to hear cause in bank denied. BY
the Court.
s,66s-People's Savings Bank vs. Hodgdon-Mo.
ton denied.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
McKinstry, j., presiding Mckee. j.; Ross, j.;
Martin, Deputy Clerk; Finkler, Bailiff.
s,5S4EGridley VS.. Boggs ct ai.-Argument re.
stunned by W. c. Becher for respondent and c. ork
for appellant and submitted.
S,6s5-Kitts W. Superior Court OF Nevada eoun-
ty-Argued by kits for petit ioner and ordered that
petitioner have until tomorrow to file his points
and authorities, cause to be submitted thereupon.
s,593-YAnderford vs.. Foster-0n motion of Chip
man for appellant, ordered that stipulation to s.
c. Dicus be filed herein and made a part OF the re-
cord. Cause argued by Chapman for appellant and
Barry for respondent.
s,i77-Central Pacific Railroad Company vs. Mead
Argued by Albery for respondent and Bridgeford
for appellant and submitted.
s,504-Hart vs.. Specht ct al.-Argued by Bridge
ford for appellant and Hart for respondent and sub
mitted.
s,664-M Montgomery VS. Morrill, .. al-Argued by
Bridgeford for appellant and Ai1esy for respondent
and submitted
Adjourned until 10 A. NJ. tomorrow.
7,454-Rosenkraz vs. Wagner ct sl.-0rdered that
this cause be submitted Judgment affirmed. By
the Court.
1924 Henley vs. Kelley ct a'.-Judgmeat az
frmed. 1he Court.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
Morrison, c. j., presiding; Myrick, j.; Sharpstein
j.; c. \. Post, Deputy Clerk; Me- gher, Secretary
S625-Hog's Back c. NJ. Co. VS. New Basil c. NJ
Co Respondent allowed until January 10, 1888, to
file brief and appellant ten days thereafter in which
to reply, cause to thereupon stand submitted.
5O5- Clary We. Haslett-0n motion of Hart and
George for respondent and no appearance points
and authorities behalf OF app sllant ordered that
The Judgment herein be and the same is hereby al
frmed.
S,54i-Julien Va. Herzog-on motion of Hart and
George for respondent, and appearance points
and authorities on-file, ordered that the judgment
and order herein be and they are hereby affirmed.
S,4S9-Doon vs.. Tesh-Continued for the ses-
sion
Adjourned until tomorrow at 1OAH
To-DAY's CALENDER.
IN BANR.
Court meets at 0 o'clock A. NJ
s,6a3-Peope We. Rigney ct al.
DEPARTMENT ONE
Court meets at 10 o'clock A. NJ.
S,591-Peope vs.. Potter
S,613-Belcher c. and G. NJ Co. Vs. Defarrare.
S,l63-Dunn VS.. Dunn ct al.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Court meets at 10 o'clock A. NJ
S,422-Lyon & Co. ys. Crosby ct al
S,466-Lohse, estate Of
S,57l-Farrell vs.. Jones ct al.
S,5T2-Hamlton vs.. Jones ct al.
S.4lS-WeaverviIle and NJ W. r. R. Co. Vs. Board
of Supervisors of Trinity county.