National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1881-03-22
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

On motion of Mr.. SocitOr-General Phillips, George
Gray, esq. of Wilmington, Del, admitted toprac-
on motion of Mr. F. W. Hackett. George B. New
ell esq. Of New York city, was admitted to practice
New York city. and Luther r. smith esq, of Mount
Sterling, Ala, were admitted TO practice.
ON motion of Mrs. Z. Il. Lockwood, Fred Jerome
tice ~ ~ Pi''0
ner, esq of Detroit Mich, admitted 10 practice.
No. 2i5. James L. Sharp, appellant, VS.. The Dover
Of the United States for the district of Massachust IT'S
Decree reversed with COSTS and remanded for
further proceedings to be had therein in conformity
tee Woods.
No. III Ella F. Bondurant executrix, &c. appel
CONT of the United States for the district of louisiana
Decree affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice
No. 22l. Theodore Yates, plaintiff in error vs. The
National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers. In
error 70 Inc circuit Court OF the United States for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin Judgment affirmed,
with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. G9. Edward BOnham ct. al, appellants VS..
Thomas t. Needles, auditor, eft. al Appeal from the
Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern
District OF Illinois. Decree affirmed, with costs Opin-
ION by Mr.. Justice Harlan.
No. l59. The National Bank of Genesee plaintiff in
error vs. Edward NJ. Whitney ct. al In error TO the
supreme Court Of the State of New York. Decree re-
Eerd costs and cause remanded said Supreme
1oGrI WIN directions 10 enter decree in conformity
win Inc opinion Of this court Opinion by Mr.. Jus
Zee Field Dissenting, Mr. Just!c3 Harlan and Mr..
No 2!a The District of Columbia, plaintiff in error.
vs. Adolph ClusS, for the use Of John a ]. Creswe1
e. al, Commissioners, &c. In error to the Supreme
Court ofthe District of Columbia judgment affirmed
Win costs: Opinion by Eir. Justice Field.
No ~. The Philadelphia and Baltimore Central
fhir"3d Company. appellant vs. The United States.
Ill from the Court of Claims. Judgment affirmed.
OplnIcn by Mr.. Justice Miller.
M 6 George W. GrinnelI ct AL plaintiffs in error
y Inc Chicago. Rock Island and Pacific Railroad
Company al. In error TO the supreme CoTrt of tIe
STATE 81 Iowa. Judgment affirmed with costs Opin-
P Si 1y MI Justice Miller Dissenting, Mr.. Justice
No. 20 Eliza Jane Dennick administrator. &c.
l';ll1 IN error VS.. The Central Railroad Company
T ~ HeT Jersey In error 10 the Circuit Court OF the
IlitN otseS Tor the Northern District of New York
Jl.slnelit reversed with COSTS and cause renanded
vi directions 10 award new trial Opinion by Mr.
NJ No 2l2 William II. Cook, appellant vs. Charles
f appeal from Circuit Court of the United States
W ltie district of Louisiana. Decree affirmed with
CSts' opinion by Mr.. ChefJustice Waite
,iEi 10 Mrs E f. Bondurant, cxecutrix &C. plain
6lne Court ofhe State of Louisiana Writ of error
S is Tor want of jurisdiction. Opinion by Mr.
- 10. x; The Cenlral National Bark of Baltimore
PalnuIi IN error Us. The Royal Insurance Company
fr, 20 Circut Court United States. Southern Dis
6IGi Of New York. Judgment affirmed, with costs
Ol l by Mr.. Chief Justice Waite
erT"L' vs. The International Bank, of Chicago In
Of fIi lfcq Court United States Northern District
by Mr. SSo 5gdgment affirmed with costs. Opinion
IN sg o CheSter A Arthur collector, &c. plaintiff
IUqII Ined States. Southern District of New York
iv Si nan aTnled, with costs and interest. Opinion
NO ~ William H Seward Of al annellapts We
10 10 % iptiSte Comeau, sheriff Sc et al Appeal from
0f SoU[t OF the United states for the District
Dy Mr. Chief Justice Matte NO NF-A0ti
Norton 5 e. Francis Fl E Hineley appellant Levi P
Rnr rsI STATES for the Southern District of illinois,
Justice Nm TIiled with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Chief
sT no p gE: George P Humphrey appellant vs. San
United appeal from the Circuit Court of the
AnSI S Tor the Eastern District of Michigan.
Jasiice W Sssed with costs Opinion by Mr.. Chief
Aji S9 original. Exparte: The Des Moines and
far Trpit railroad Company, petitioner Petition
Jnsice 70 snow cause denied. Opinion by Mr. Chief
On NO - ~ The Batimorcand Ohio Railroad COMPANY.
party Dsi o. Mr. R. T Merrck, dismissed; each
Ro%er cs Upton County, plaintiff in error, vs. The
plaHiifF IN tYe Works; No II69, Upton County,
ia T9 ~ error, VS.. Norton Slaughter & Co: No
Fi1, IIRSon County plaintiff in error vs. JObn n
doeeteds sSSd % 9,. on motion of Mr. R. T. Merrclx
son P III The City of Waco plaintiff in error VS. Mel
with COSTS vi motion Of Mr.. P. Phillips, dismissed
Fs 80 Clay Green appellant. vs.. H. c. and F. NJ.
NeSsrs T j npr ro GiSllSs OF affirm submitted by
Hen n.re ana by Mr. Thomas J. Semmes in onposition
AIoo, DOL Clay Green appellant. vs. Mary Ann Fisk
Iyr rCa 10 dismiss or affirm submitted by Messrs r 4
Mr. TIioIn9s V, hornor in support of same and by
C; Original. Ex parte: The Detroit River Ferry
shniTti b etlqoner Motion for rule to show cause
NJ s. The S tP NJ: g. g. Wisner for petitioner.
Wiminpt6nh Mount et al; No. Ct, The New York and
WILLIAMS II IN steamship Company. appellant vs.
in No 81 ~ sloett ct al Motion TO reform mandate
Van OF Tor further instruction Armed nv Az {,
BGneGcf ~ o0rd IN support OF same and by Mr. r. T.
in No e. ~ support of his motion TO anend mandate
Ssntyoar5 fan anu IN opposition to motion of Mr. Van
No IA 5Siu t Tor 11riher instruction.
of dS Board ofSchool Directors of the Parish
No 2i Tba Ipiahuh IN error VS.. Joseph Hernandez:
of lynrdhe board Of School Directors of the Parish
Moo6' ~ plaintiff in error vs. JoSeph Fernando
Semi 20 dismiss submitted by Sfr T6nnIaS
in 0ppositioSSu support of same, aud by Mr. G. L. Bright
Am6o mn delaware. Argument eommencai h[r Mr.
Adio1yy,i aiiS 5 for plaintiff in error -
i'ii to-day al twelve o'clock