The People's vindicator. [volume] (Natchitoches, La.) 1874-1883, 1881-01-22
The Electoral Count.


abandoned their attempt to pass the
Morgan joint resolution providing for
the proper counting of the Electoral
vote, at least for the time being; but
that it will ultimately be passed by the
present Congress there is no question,
so it is difficult to see what the Repub-
licans have gained By their factious and
uncalled-for opposition. They have
wasted one week OF time and placed
themselves on record as opposin. any
plan for settling the dispute about how
the Electoral vote ought to be counted,
but that is all. The Democrats had not
a quorum in themselves and SO could
not force vote over the heads OF the
filibustcrs. but when all the members
are present they will have Il quorum, and
can pass the resolution whatever the
minority may do to prevent il. Until
such q time shonld arrive the Repub-
leans. by tilibustering, would be able
to prevent the passage of the measure,
and therefore the Democrats acted
wisely in laying it aside untilthe arrival
OF their tardy members will give
them strength enough to put the
resolution through. 1t is not neces-
sjlry to spend further time in the dis
cussion of q measure that IS so clearly
right and proper and which has been
discussed ut too great length already.
The position that the President of the
Senate is vested with absolute, arbi.
trary power over the Electoral returns,
and the counting Of them, and that there
is no authority anywhere which tram
sends his, or which can question his
official acts, is utterly monstrous, and
the Democratic majority in the House
will display a pitiable weakness if it
ever allows the Electoral count to 90
forward under such an intoerab,e
usurpaton OF authority as is claimed for
the Vice President Of the United States.
II consistency were thing which ever
troubled Republican politician in the
least; Or if it We're not the cardinal fea-
ture of Republican policy and the fun
damental idea OF their political faith,
that a partisan advantage is the thiny
to be aimed at regardless alike of law,
justice, precedent or common sense; it
would be difficult to understand how
the Republican party can now take its
stand upon a proposition that four
years ago its ablcst statesmen utterly
repudlatca and condemned as q thing
altogether abominablc. During the
electoral dispute in Congress. four years
ago, this very same question was agi-
tated and Senators Conktiny, Edmunds,
Carpenter and others, the ab!est Con.
stitutional lawyers in the party and in
the country, declared that the claim
made for the Vice-President that he
should count the vote WAS prcposterous,
and not for a moment to be thought OF.
They spoke against the proposition in
the strongest terms and voted against
it. Yet, in the face of this. we have
such alleged leaders OF the Republican
party as Conger and Keller maintaining
as sound the very principle which these
able Constitutional lawyers of their own
party then condemned. And the Re-
publican party new appears as defend.
ing 4 procedure which, four years ago,
it pronounced unconstitutional and
revolutionary, and its organs exhort
the minority in Congress to tilibuster
all winter, it necessary. in support of a
proposition which heretofore has been
pronounced by Republican leaders as
dangerous. unconstitutional and uu.
sound. Such are the inconsistencies of
Observation-Disclosures flGinde1!er.