Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1881-05-13
THE COURTS.
SUPREME coUhT.
THURSDAY, May II, 1881.
N BANK.

/ N BANK.
Court met pursuant to ADJOURNMENT Present :
Morrison, c. j., presiding; Mckinstry, Thorn
ton, Mckee, j.. Myiick, j.; Sharpstein, J.;
Ross, j.; c. n. Post. Deputy Clerk; Henry Z.
F.nkler, Baiiif
] 7I30-NiEer vs. Heiibron--Ar argument concluded
by Attorney-General Hart for appellant ami Cad
walader for respondent, ard submitted on briefs to
be fiied-ten days to appellant, and ten thereafter
! to respondent in which to file such orlefs
/ 775i-Newcomb vs.. Tisdaie ct al.-Arguea oy
Hamilton for appellant and A. L. Hart for respond
ei t. and ordered to be submitted upon the ming OF
| briefs, with ten days to respondent 20 reply.
Adjourned until Tuesday, May II, 1881, at 10
O'Clock A. NJ.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
MeKiDstry, j., presiding Mckee. j.; Ross, I.
! n. Post Deputy Clerk !; ii. c. finkler, Bain
| 7ol6-Dunn VS.. Dunn-fn motion OF futile and
stipulation on file ordered that the appeal herein
be, and the is hereby dismissed, without costs
| and without prejudice to another appeal
| 7S40-Eclipse Gold and Silver Mining Company
vs.. Spring ct al-Gn motion of futile and stipua-
ton on file, ordered that this be continued to
| the next San Francisco SESSION.
| II, Catastrophe VS.. Fuqua- Argued by Cheney Tor
appellant and Attorney General Hart for the Peo-
ple and Submitted.
| 7427-Thorel vs. Figg-On motion of Catlin, for
appellant, and stipulation file, order d that the
appeal herein be- and the same is hereby dismissed,
at appellants casts
/ 1926 Hendricks rs Spring Valley H. g. NJ. Co.
On motion of Gale FIR respondent, and by consent,
ordered that the appeal herein be- and the same is
hereby dismissed.
l0.591-People vs. Harley Argued by Attorney
General Ha for the People, and ordered that the
Judgment and order herein be~reye sed and the
cause remanded ior new trial.
10,6l2-People vs.. Brilliant-0rdered that the APP
pellaut herein have ten days in which to file brief
that the Attorney General have ten days in which 10
reply, and that the cause be submit. ed upon the
filing of such briefs.
10,621-Peeple vs. Leehon- Ordered that this
cause be submit ted upon the filing of a brief by APP
pellant within ten days.
1o,62S-People We. Dalton-Argued by Attorney
General Hart for appellant and submitted.
10,634-Peope VS.. Flanagan-srgued by 10 Ham
lton Tor appellant AID Attorney General Hart for
thu People, and submitted.
IO637-People VS. KeIly-Passed on calendar.
7739-Ward VS.. Superior Court Marin county AR
gued by Love for petitioner and Shaterfor respond
ent. and submitted.
65S3-Thomas W. Moedy-Judsment reversed
and remarded to the Court below, with direc-
tons to enter Judgment the findings in favor of
the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum
of sl3 26s 20 in United States gold com, with legal
interest thereon, in like god coin, from the LIST day
of June, 1878, and for costs OF suit. ROSS, j.
We concur: MCKEE. J
McKIN TstY, j.
Adjourned until O'Clock a. NJ. tomorrow.
DEPARTMENT TWO
Court met at $50 P NJ Decentralization, c. J.,
presiding; Thornton, j.; Myrick, j.; Sharpstein,
D., u ". fosly Dtplty IstiiS hSnSp,
Bailiff
7469ATown of Woodland vs. Stephens On mo-
tos of Treadwell and stipulation on file ordered
that this cause be continued to the San Francisco
0,57S-P People vs.. Olivie-Argued by Deputy At
torney- General Blanchard for the People, and sub
mitted.
1O.59s-People vs. Beck-Argued by Carter for
appellant and Deputy Attorney General for the PEP
pie; ten days to appellant to file brief and ten to
respondent to reply cause to be submitted when
such briefs are filed.
10,GI3-People ys. Feen Twenty days to parties
TO file briefs cause to be submitted when such
bri fs are filed.
1O.623-People w. Romargie- Twenty days to par
ties to file briefs to be submitted when such
10,632-People vs. Wheeler-Continued to San
Francisco session.
1O,636-People vs.. Golden-Argued by Hatch for
respondent and Deputy Attorney General Blanchard
for appellant five days to parties to file briefs
cause TO be then submitted.
Adjourned until 10 o'clock tomorrow.
To-pAY's CALENDAR.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
Court meets at o'clock AN.
CALENDAR
7529-Moran vs. Abbey ct al.
7569-Hendricks vs. Spring Valley II. and |. Co.
7esi-Farley vs.. Spring Valley NJ. and l. Co.
5s3-De Jsraatt VS.. Cooper ct al.
7622-Jefers, Administrator, VS.. Cook ct al.
7479-Montcomery vs.. Spect.
7665-Fairbanks VS.. Williams.
74s6-yeerkamp vs. Hurburt C. and E. Company.
65l2 Preston vs.. Culbertson.
679s-city Of Maryville North Bloomfield G.
NJ. Co. ct al.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
Court meets at loan.
7500-Coultburst VS.. Coulthurst.
1856 Hungarian Hill G. and u. Co. VS.. Moser
ct al.
759o-stephens vs.. Halstead
752I-RaInsey VS.. Tourney ct al.
72os -Lybecker ct al VS.. Murray.
76i1-Go5dwin VS.. Goodwin.
7oS0-Carcy vs.. Brown ct al
745T-Stecle vs. His Creditors.
745S-Freeman Rahm.
7466-Bank of Woodland W. Hiatt
7562-williams VS.. NJ ntgomery
7573-Whits VS.. Freeman.
7642-Grener VS.. Grenier
734S-Bennett VS.. Matteson.
7490-Ferguson Neville.