, 1881-02-05

crNttnh Ht tho present Dill might Will PRO-
presentation just at fills tfa,o was
a LITTLE r1sgMATu1sE. ANYWAY.
. I1errington, Of KING, Inquired Il tllp 1fot,sc
Investigating Committee WaS not tistrticteti
~ report siicli legislation hi this matter rs III
Its opinion might bG necessary.
calling Committee. replied TINT 1t WIS, md
st,ggeslcd tint tlia bili might ynry properly
!,u rrfurrut 10 TINT Committee, fnstca.l Ut tho
Railroad Committee: ::.
!ny, under tho present Inv. cptltA 40 to tho
Cnnrts, hut TINT every complaint must PASS
through tho llart!s Ut tllo Cnn,nilss1nn. WINS
no approved of the general tenor Of tho hi,l,
tirely loo brcai. :ff t!o pooling, for instance,
stopped outside tic State,
Till, I.:a1sf.Arul.E HAD no AUTHORITY,
III hts opinion. 10 control tho natter, Tho
bill was n,,e which IN It's essential provisions
SHOULD certainly rccelvo very ser!nus coll
placet lii thu, hands Of individuals somo
remedy against what might become II grent
burden to tho industrial classcs OF tho
Stnte.
i'rnd Durfce, of Mucon. argued TINT, tic
individuals md corporations. Even Gr0eers,
druggists. atsd merchants combined. nllt!
1urMl insurance IDhItia wcrc something with
which everybody wns acquainted.
THE STATE DlD NOT MAKE WAR
upon these Interests, nnd ha could not SEQ
do!nE what was practically tho sntno thing.
JOG Mann opposed THO anti-poollng bill for
all lie wns WORTH, Theirs was law On aho
stn!ntc,hooks nov, l,e said, TO prevent sla
sonnlle rites. II peuplu would mt use thu
means already provided to prevent NxtortiOn,
why should tho Legislature offer them nthcr
fnsl'lies wilGt neither It n9r tilo i,nI' ili ,,
vert tried. Must tic Legislature force tlin
people to protect tllclnsclves? II a railroad
company li3crimtnatetl ngntnst II client Of
his, lle would DO OIL hand very carly III the
morning
TRYING TO PREVENT IT.
It might hc possible TINT the railroads pooled
ntrl 1nutle Il rate higher than they woul! II
they hadn't pooled. But tito question un1er-
lying this Whole discussion WIS, Did they
thureby mnku rate WHICH was uilreaSOnnh[e::
my community to have. its businessmen
doing business on tho cut-throat pla,. II lio
neglected under tic present law to plant
suit against n railroad company. ,f1r dis.
f5s'a0 fore ts esIslStrs III a sae ask L i 70 p'eet
hIm. Tho iiailron.i IL Warehouse Co,nlris-
slUners, lis far M tho returns werc ln,-!lo
thought there were q few moro counties
but. II they aIan't do their fuii duty, letcoI,.
side Of the 1Iegislaturu and
IT worf,D 1yvrsr1u ATE THEM,
rr,, 70 .',,,. ~ H. -, ,,.n,,,,t ,.,. t,,,.,,t,,.
~; roH"a u ,La ,,rasot iUM tM NM. Mv" l. ~ whsc
Ill., t ig.si g pteSai "y, Mut ~, sxtnr Wi1
ete Ill.,. Nv, Mas ~ M0st a.sc1m, ut , u sA
s.o!. .s Gq.1n ius ~ p,!sSm H. ~" "''tases
feenvaffea ~ ,ieo ttSs ,s uie Mnnd!: tt,a
what man could do when hls elevator was
on rai'roaa so,"pnyt ,n, groundi W ,,noo
alnnh repleu sm5 H. nEst IS, e,teG t t,orn WIS ~, y"
get {he elGsalof OF: Wneti ne Ment tiose ~
Pas snse!t MnMsr tno 10mapns'y,s ,, pnWei, ,,,v II
nv ,,mt @ taa y t'T, ta. ri,,ht - , n.nx ram @
MNe tns ILsLa nM'y alt!! Itt. ~. -, ia
~ ne gemsfn us!es1oM ~ " rotnY, tnatY I ;',at 1'l ~
IT, Iu o 10y ~ " ~ ~ pst.sar, o,G I"3t tl'a t
doctofs OIL qliack VINO went arouha
cui.lSd sotsE THINGS AT HALF rIlicE'
Chattieid suggested tllat iii doing tl,is tho
hig railroats arld tlle littlu ones sat down on
TIL, puopiu cnlpcttvcty.
Rockwell luullirctt il any railroad Ind ever
| fAted because Of the cllcaplluss Of Its rates.
Mann repllcti tint tg knew Of, plenty Ut
rentIs which lInd failed buca,se they could
not curry III ehcnpty rs others which lnaue
!oW rntes 1tist 70 lfSez9 1neHi ont. ZIG w,