Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1881-01-20

hr. CANRoN said he was adverse to the BILL for
the reason that he was not for restricting any min
ing or other enterprise in California. Besides the
Dill was loosely drawn, and not in harmony with the
laws of the State or the sentiment of the people
The bill would be imperative even were it to pass
MIR. FRASER said he satisfied that no such bill
should pass or could pass the House. He would
therefore move that the enacting clause be stricken
out
Mr.. MURPHY of San Luis obispo amended that the
bill be indefinitely postponed.
Ruled out of order
Mr.. KELLoee remarked that the bill ought to be
given first reading.
Mr. WHiPPLE was for striking out the enacting
clause
Mr.. MCCLURE, for legal reasons, held like
opinion.
Mr.. EDWARDS said the enacting clause could not be
fore the House
The Chair ruled the point we'll taken.
The roll was called and the bill was refused first
reading, thus being practically reiected-ayes 6,
noes 81.
The Committee on Labor and Capital, by pernis-
sion, next reported on A. B. IS, to create bureau
OF Labor and Statistics of Labor the sta Of Cali
fornia, recommending that it do not pass
A. b. 80, to create and maintain public intelli-
gence office in California for the procuring free OF
charge OF situations for the working classes recon-
mending that il do not pass
A b. SO, to provide for work upon the public
works or buildings within this State to be done by
day labor and under the supervision of a Superin-
tendent or officer having charge Of the same with
pass
The consideration of the general file was then
resumed.
A B. 123, to encourage the destruction of coyotes
in the different counties OF the State, and author
iziDg the Board of Supervisors OF each of said
counties to fix and determine the bounty for the
destruc ion of the same, was read the first time
A. B. 134, to provide for practical exposition of
the resources OF the State of California refused
first reading.
A. B. 40, 10 amend an Act 4ntitled au Act to pro-
vide for the mpetion Of the 5Uildng N ths city
and county CT San Francisco known as the new
City Hall, approved March "a, Is76, was refused
first reading.
A. B. 50, to repeal Sections 5, 6 and Ct an Act
entitled an Act to facilitate and equaliZe the collec
ton Of licenses in the city and county Of San Fran
cisco, approved March %, a ID. 1873, withdrawn
without reading.
A. B. Ga, to amend Section of an Act entitled an
Act to facilitate and equaliZe the collection of
licenses in the city and county Of San Francisco,
approved March q, 1875 was refused first reading.
A B. 65, to amend an Act entitled an Act
cerning lodging houses end sleeping apartments
within the limits OF incorporated cities, was also re-
fused reading.
A. B. IA, to define the location and existence of
aundries within the limits OF incorporate cities,
was refused first reading.
A. B. 70, to authorize the several counties cities
and countless cities and towns Il this State, and the
officers and Boards OF officers thereof TO receive
property by gift bequest and devise, and to hold,
manage and dispose OF such property, and the in.
come and increase thereof, was read first time.
A. d. 161, to compel persons, companies, associa-
tons corporations whose business it is to supply
water or gas for public domestic use, TO furnish
meters at their expense, was read the first
time.
A. B. 197, to compel individuals, companies or
corporations owning controlling water for pur-
poses of irrigation to distribute the water pro rata
among purchasers in times OF scarcity was read the
first time.
At 2:55 the Assembly adjourned.