Arizona weekly enterprise., 1881-11-05
oxnY ssaxs1 AgG2frza.''

d
 sible cur that may bark at our heels, and would not do so in this instance, did not the unpublished facts connected with the case make it peculiarly aggravating one.
 Last week, before this Charles Miller returned to Pinal, he was introduced to us as the foreman of the Floyd jury, and the party introducing him informed us that an article in the ENTERPRISE had iarrod upon the exceedingly delicate sen abilities of the rare aud radiant youth
 We were surprised beyond measure and graciously inquired how we had chanced to offend the great and good Sir "Cbawlcs." Thererpon, history repeated itself, and "the ass opened its mouth and spake," saying it had been lead to believe that our comments on the Floyd trial re- flected on the jury. Wewere more surprised than ever. and informed Sir Chawles that his belief was certainly without founda- tion, as the article stated clearly that the evidence, which would have convicted the prisoner, was not introduced, and that for th's reason he escaped the punish ment his crime mcrited. To make as surance doubly sure we brought the pout- ing poltroon over to our sanctum and read the article to him. Ee then pro ceeded to uncover the mi ger in the wood pile" by saying that he had no seen anything wrong in the article till J. D. Reymert and II. B. Summers came to him stating that it was reflection on the jury and it was his duty as foreman to an- swer it. He did not wish to have any thing to do with it at first, he said, but finally yielded to the persuasion of that Oily Cannon and goh of guts, J. D. Key inert. He further stated that Reymert had written the reply for him and for warded it to the Drill. ''Dut," said he, ''I an going up to Pinal on the stage to- day (Thursday), and I pied e you my word that the article shall not go into the paper, for know that Reymert Is yom personal enemy, and l see now that he is trying to nuke 8 tool of me to grasify his own spite" He also stated that he thou Int at the time Reymert had some personal interest in the matter, for he would scruple at nothing to accomplish his own purposes. From this point the coniding youth discussed the cunning coward pretty freely, stating that he knew his record back for twcnty-four years, and it showed him up as "d-n rescal III every sense uf the word" He volun- teered considerable more information con corning the tricky transactions of this dough-faced dastard, but 1t is unnecessary to mention them at this sta. e of the gme. ! Supposing Miller was man of his word and would disdain to lend himself, know in. -ly, as a cats paw to rake Reymert's chestnuts out of the fire, we were sur. prised to see him father the filth in thl l Drill and thus parade himself as a stupid css and q very common liar. The act proves one of two thin. 5, viz: that ! "Chawles" is either a fool or a kllve. fJc certainly he would not consent to perform the dirty work of man he calls rascal unless he is hopeless iliot or con seienceless knave. That he is liar is proven by his voluntary promise to stoF the pub ieatiun of the libe,ous and un. wIrraAted article which appeared over hi; signature. That he is d dcadbeat k proven by the fact that he could not pro cure a single meal at the Silver Kin; ho tel without putting up the coin or rivin. security, Tat le is a good judge O whisky everybody knows But enou ] of Chawlesfur the present. The real cu pri in the case is that moral leper, that erin. ing coward, that quintessence of all tha is moan and contemptib!e, J. D. Key inert, from whose flth-emi.ting brain th, article emanated, and who, true to hi cowardiy instincts, shifted the responsi bihty for it onto the shoulders of thi
 poor dupe. He knew the article bore tn, impress of falsity on it's face He kEe7 that every reader of it would see that it aim was not to resent real or imaginar, reelection on the Floyd jury, but tn grat
 fly personal spite against Thos. F
 Weedin. He knew that, being known a
 lawyer, he would make himself ridior
 lous by abusinr US for not attempting t
 offer heresay testimony on the witnes
 stand. Considerin these facts and rt membering that he has IS black recor
 as ever haunted q guilty conscience, tA
 public will readily understand why !
 should have induced Miller to father th
 article. It stands him in hand to f.-l
 shy of personal controversies on his ow
 responsibility, and he can only seek rc
 ven-e on those who have earned his h. tired. by resorting to methods that any bC
 in.-, having an instinct above that of th brute, would scorn to adopt. If he @ poets to practice these methods with ili r punity, in dealing with us, he reckon without his host. We do not like til l practice of airing mems social and bus , ues7 corruptions in public print, but al liable to read this sin-soiled puppy se' l eral interesting chapters from his histor,
 past and present, if he tries any mol
 such games on us.
 | ---------------------
 = THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY.