, 1881-10-12
1.I}OTlIER BOURNES.
More Testimony Adverse to His
Financial Character.
Fond Of Collecting, But Unwilling to
Pay Over the Funds.

tnuruE 10 con1inao thu I'm In y. tno .su,' =. -
!n," n business transactions and obtaining
,noney ,avS under falsp rrc,onsrs. Whcn tho court
opened only aboat 'ltecn n'e"tncrs " tno atos-
bytcrY wGrd present, lilolliath6 1a0 ncoused,
cjurks, nnd counsel. Tho ltor. j. j. H. sonlo
p1asaaen r,r IT Tim prey,ou, doy,s procccdtnos
Ine lce"M Nv, .,o ,,,,,, ,IIsnrs.i,w ,vns hn w..
va U"a tho ana Of this rceor ~s Tho
clerks bad on,1cavorcd to tako dawn nations,
questions, answers, a'la everything e'se III lote.
hnnd. aud tho result wns very unsatisfactory 10
tho connscI til ssthor side and to tho court. It
WI, suggested by tho lsev. Mr.. wlshara that It
wills III. H.oua ~. .x.''.tas. 49,, ~ - 49,.
tho tessinon?T1nas lne'hue,s wao n'nae" ~ so'
p"net ,1, ME- runt,cr If yns acoIIrh 10 uyn nm
:" a. s.hc,nc ~ kcop,nu !, verbatim rucurl OF tho
Nv, ~ ,i,o rorks tnIt,o tnstrun,cti 10 taky dow,
on'y what WIS s'I''ot nhpo..u.'
Tho hearing ot tost!tnohy "as no" Fesu1aoa'
THE nEv. HENRY II. rAsNrEn
nea9 .no ,ms. rn ,xno Mr 1,o,,rncs VIM ain.
tho missionary LOT wnom mr. io.nes ,vt, was w.. 'up
posed to eollc'. ' msss a noaa a
t int hS tdofendunt, shout. collect money os.cn.
sbIy for witness, tint witness should ti!ytde
evenly ,,atmrinI wrsn @ M" assw,intnn ~ hnv;nr ~.
to tho ~ },i9 %tno,i,s. 1nfan,ant Ind *
}irat TINT
p;fnr,i IN suiinI: sbscrlptinns without receiving
anly for bis services. Witness was shocked W
Inc psutusltion tintlo by defendant, afd dec1ihed
to giyn M answer to Il. -
TN tho ocr0ss-exNtnlnatinn Mr. PAyntcr stated
that Eio lid not kHuw whettlor the defendant h'l.l
collected any money after inaklnK tho PROPOSE
aeu e qs pls ss s.nxc Of tho proceeding, every ooo in
tbo nppeuranee of blind 'nan WIN, was eh !'y il
te,ncs, nfu my Of J'Uu lit uGrd 0f r!oEu or
coIIrt-plastcrf'
rnlI suggested that The prosecution needed
soiaethlng 70 Enko thn,r ensg "stickt" anl
nl,other brother, thlnkiix otl4ently of tho very
III, expressed the np!nion tlat sumo. Ut tito
counsel might nced 3D. WITT bof2sd t fne
t"rs,ntss liz trnl In srrI nm ,,,iookeI. iVr wny
H se"t Ssssy retreat. T. Tic trial ,hen protsa'lcd
.s,,sa ,pe. it, S ss:5ss ssfsrs!"s: vs.!te. hin,
nsS s 1sn iisa Tor or rci8s wor!; ii thu ssock Yards
x .lay d two Inter the Itey. Nj. rayn,er
se t. wsss H. Win si!s r;sancst W., w.,
ihun Ynye ,.eten,1nnt -. with tho nnderstA,nl-
ing tlat Mr. raynter was to receive hnlt: Wit
oycr received tic $a.iO.
The ltov, nr. blackburn was called Dy tho .lc-
fci,se tn prtve tint defendant bad hcen rcGu-
lirly appointed or dIrcctt 10 solicit BubserIp..
tons; bnt th9 witness cn tlot retncn;pes: anu
sns,"ttnn ~ wnI"il hnvr in IN, nf rniucei iatnr.
soo'"'''" "o''1 ~, .,''. ~ :. ~ ,,,.r~ '"'s''
bookkcopor for tho Methodist hook Concern,
tesl!lir tilt while ilo wns crcufutor for tho old
naa itst i!e e,yagot' iclv:,lnns 10 eaayass 3, i's
%asd and Sishiss" sys;ass, u. srd IT, brS,aEht ,;i,t
on those tnuroughfares. Witness thought this
did not !oak strI'sht. and accortstngly inscstt,
saicl .hS matter; found TINT delorlant hn
taking tholr order fur tho fust. Defendant wis