Sacramento daily record-union., 1881-02-14

The apportonment of the assessment OF sald
property by the Board, for and to Sacramento
county is follows
Franchise, assessed value. s11 400: tax, Sl4S 20.
Roadway, road-bed and rails, assessed value, SlSo
100 tax, 81, 4l5 80.
WARREN DUTTON, Chairman,
D. N. KENFIELD,
JAS. l.. KING,
T. D. HEISkELL,
NJ. NJ DREW,
State Board Of Equalization.
L. ". MAsLE, Clerk.
Against SAID franchise, State and county tax,
Sl4S %; costs, 81 81.
Against Sc d roadway, road-bed and rails, State
and county tax, 81 AS 30; costs, sl22 ~
Total tax and costs, 81, ,12i Is
No. 45l-Aganst Railroad Company, California
Pacific.
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO May -, 1850
To Joseph W. Houston, Assessor Of Sacramento
County-Sir The State Board OF Equalization, on
the 30th day OF April 1880 assessed, for the year
1850 the California Pacific Railroad Company for It's
franchise, roadway, rails, roadbed and rolling stock,
in the State OF California, at 81, Sol, 800 90.
The entire length Of main track OF said railway IN
said State is ll2 SLIGO miles.
The length of main track of said railway in the
county of Sacramento is 5l-100 OF a mile.
The assessed value per mile Of the length OF said
man track of railway, fixed by pro rata dlstrl-
button Of the assessed value OF the whole property
of said company in Sacramento county, is as t0iloWs
Of franchise, per mile, $1,000 90; OF roadway,
roadbed and rails per mile Sll 200 90 Of rolling
stock, per mile, SSH 80.
The apportionment of the assessment OF said
property by the Board for and to Sacramento coun-
ty, is as follows
Franchise, assessed value, $1,000; tax, sl3 90.
Roadway roadbed rails and rolling stock, assessed
WARREN DUT1ON Chairman.
D. NJ. KENFItLD,
JAMES L. KING,
T. D. HEISkELL,
NJ NJ DREW,
A., i sc E.,traI aI-a4f
E. ". MAsLIN Clerk
Aga nst said franchise-State and county tax
sl3 co. Drainage District No tax, so cents; COSTS
81 II
Against said roadway, roadbed, rails and rolling
stock-State and county tax, S9l q Drainage Dis
trict No. tax, s. 500 costs, 50 - Total tax and
costs, S1I4 46f.
No. 452-Against Railroad Company, Central Pa
cific
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO, NAV I3. 1850.
To Joseph W Houston Assessor Of Sacramento
County-Sir The State Board Of Equalization on
the Both day of April, 1880 assessed for the year
1850 the Central Pacific Railroad Company for its
franchise roadway rails rOadbed and rolling stock,
in the State of California at Sl2,239, ,456
The entire length OF main track OF railway OF said
company in said State is 60i miles.
The length of the man track of said railway IN
the county of Sacramento Is Al miles The assessed
va ue per mile Of length OF said main track OF rail
way, as fixed by the pro rata distribution OF the
assessed value OF the WlOte property OF Sdlu COul
pany IN Sacramento county, is as follows Of fran
chise per mile, $1,000; of roadway, roadbed and
rails per mile, 81, 500; OF rolling stock per mile
S6.464
The apportioy rnent Of the assessment of said prop
erty by the Board for and to Sacramento county is
as follows:
Franchise, assessed value, $4,000 tax, sl,o66;
r adway, roadbed, rails and rolling stock, assessed
value, $74S, S24 tax, 50, ,7S4 II 20 100.
WARREN DUrTON, Chairman.
D. ~ KENFIELD.
JAS. L. KING.
7 d. HEISKELL,
NJ NJ. DREW,
State Board of Equalization.
E. W. MAsLrS, Clerk
Against said franchise - State and county tax,
81, ,O66 Drainage District No. tax, S24 So costs,
500 02.
And against said roadway, roadbed rails and
rolling stock - State and county tax, 1874 II
20-1O0 Drainage District No tax, s223 735 costs,
Si9S AZ total tax and COSTS Sll SOP 80 70-l00.
No 453-Against Railroad Company, Sacramento
| and Placeryille
OPFICE OF TIE STATE BOARD or EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO. May l3, 1850.
To Joseph W. Houston, Assessor OF Sacramento
county-Sir: The State Board of Equalization, on
the Both day of April 1880 assessed for the year 1880
the Sacramento placervile Railroad Company
for its franchise, roadway, rails roadbed and rolling
stock in the State of California, at S539,09S 90.
The entire length OF main track OF railway of said
company, in said State, is 4S 50-100 miles. The
length OF the main track of said railway in the
county OF Sacramento, is % 75-100 miles.
The assessed value per mile of length OF said main
track of railway fixed by the pro rata dstTibu-
ton of the assessed valQe OF the whole property OF
said company in Sacramento county, is follows
OF franchise, per mile, 81; of roadway, roadbed
and rails, per mile, $4,000; Of rolling stock, per
mile, 81 a14 a..
The apportionment Of the assessment Of said
property by the Board for and to Sacramento county
as follows: Franchise assessed value $50 70 tax,
IS 67-I0O cents. Roadway roadbed, rails and roll
ing stocz, assessed value, s33O,65i 3s; tax, So
WARREN DUTToN, Chairman,
D. NJ. KEN FIELD,
JAS. L. KING,
T. d. HEISKELL,
NJ. II. DREW,
State Board of Equalization.
E. W. NAsLIS, Clerk.
Against said franchise-State and county tax,
| IS G7-l00 cents Drainage District No. TAX, Il
cents costs 80 cents. m
Against said roadway, roadbed, rails and Ionins ing
stock-State and county tax, si,z99 2O - le-ioo W
Drainage District No tax, sl55 60 costs SzZo W
total tax and costs, 81, ,67s % 62l00.
No 454-Against Nelson Ray and east nan iot :.
and O. Eighth and Ninth streets, in the city OF
Sacramento, for tax improvements ana personal
property. State and county tax, - 30 drainage
District No tax 263 cents costs, 81 80 totai tax
and COSTS sS 5Si.
Ninteenth and Twentieth streets, IN the city OF Sac
ramento. State and county tax, - odj drainage
District No l tax 81 cents; costs, ~ cents.
And lot 8. | and j. Nineteenth and Twentieth
streets in the city of Sacramento, and improvements
state and county tax $40 OIL ranage District No.
tax, 3SL cents /; costs, 81 u.
AMI personal property, being lien upon the fore
going real estate. State and county tax, 80 cents;
Drainage District No. tax, II cents; COSTS so cents;
total tax and costs. S18 924.
No 465-Against Robert Robinson and lots and
g. and P Twentieth and Twenty-first streets, in
the city OF Sacramento. State and county tax,
81 80 Drainage District No. tax 30 cents; costs,
90 cents total tax and costs, 50.
No 463-Against S. L. Rodgers and south half Of
north half lot s. and O. Third and Fourth streets,
In the city OF Sacramento, and improvements State
and county tax, SO 40; Drainage District No.
tax, 40 cents; costs, 81 04; total tax and costs,
s11 81.
No. 471-Against Jesse Slaughter and north 80
feet of east 81 feet lot T. aud o. Third and Fourth
streets in the city of Sacramento, improvements
and personal property. State and county tax
$40 O5 Drainage District No. l tax, 6ls cents;
costs, 81 So total tax and costs, SIS s9f.
No. 472-Against George Smith and north half OF
east three-quarters and south half of east so feet
lot 2, aud west quarter lot 3, l and J, Third and
Fourth streets, in the city Of Sacramento, and i'm