davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
PROPOSAL FOR INDIAN SUPPLIES
AND TRANSPORTATION. -,

NEPARTMu9T or IHE INTERIOR. OMea0
" Indian A1rs, Washington March =. ISL
>ealed prope1s. iaaorsed Proposals for Bsess
(as the case iaay 30 and directed to Tie c.
missioner OF Indian Anairs, Nos Is Sad u. 49,
fr Street, Neg ferks will be received until -
Il. i1disn s.rs sbaas g; 90 90 psaods s:s.
~, 00D, CD pop6 Beef the hOof, LIS 900 $500
Beans. 7s.sdS pounds baking Powder. $3.50
pounds Flour, III 90 pounds Feed. 10, coo pounds
Hard Bread, IS ~ pounds tommy, 100 pounds
Lard, $50 barrels Mess Pork. KS .a0o pounds
kice, II 30 poss'ts Tea, Il 50 pounds Tobacco.
sW 90 pounds salt, sov, 40 pounds soap, 4, -
poands soda. -, uoo pounds sugar, sad 81. 90
Also. Blankets. WOODEN and Cotton goods. fcon-
ssting In part Of Ticking. ~. co. yards Staadari
Calico, 16, 40 yards; Drilling, ,00 yards; DUCK,
free frog all sizing. Ia, 90 yard.i )enims II o
55 90 yards; satipet. $50 yards; Brown sheet
ing. us u.s. yards; Bleached Shee,tng, s0o ards;
Hickory shifting, Ii. $50 yarts Calico shiIiing.
Groceries, Notions. Hard .sre. Medical supplies.
aud long list OF miscellaneous articles, such =,
Harness, Piows. kakes, Forks. &c ), and for ss5
Colorado, Dakots, Idaho. indiAn1 err, Minnesota,
Montana Nebraska, Nevada and Wisconsin, TO
be delivered 1T chicago, Kansas city, and
Also. Transportation for such Of the supplies.
Go DDS, and articles that may not be contracted
| for to lie delivered at the Agencies
BIDS ACsI BE AApH ctT- W oo' AAS~A'A
Ri sSKs
schedules showing the kinds and quantities Of
subsistence supplies required for each Agency,
and the kinds and liz gross OF all other
goods and articles, together with blank proposals
aud forms for contract and bond, conditions to
he Obeerve By bidders, timeAnd place OF delivery
terms OF contract and payment. transportation
routes, and all other necessary instructions will
be furnished upon application 70 tn, Indian Office
In " ashingt0D, or Nos. u and 81 hOosfer Street,
Ner Fork; YIN IL. Lyon, No. 4s3 Broadway.
New York; and to the Comnissaries OF eubsist-
ence, L. D. A At Chicago, saint Louis, saint
Paul, LeavenwOrth San Francisco, ,maha,
Che, enne, and Ysbkton, and the Postmaster at
Sioux City.
Bids will be opened at the hour and day above
stated, and bidders are invited 10 be present at
the opening
CERTIFIED CHLCKs.
All bids must be accompanied by certified
checks upon some Ia ited States Depository or
Assistant Treasurer, for at least fire per cent. OF
the amount OF the proposal.
THOMAS NJ. NICH0L,
Is Acting COmmtssi0her.
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31

The New York Tribune, in u philosophical
article upon the recent assassination Of Al
eXander ii, says: "What the assassination
of the Car has produced is reminiscence
Of his really good action:. and revival in
the mind of the world Of his most commend
able personal characteristics. To have been
called to rule such people at such time
men will consider piece of hard fortune,
deserving only Of pitiful consideration.
What he has done will be gratefully remem-
bcred-what he has left undoEc will be con-
doncd. Men will say that he was amiab!e,
kindly patured. conscientious, and with o
keen sense Of kingly responsibility. So far
as they admire him, and they will now be
disposed 10 admire him very much, they will
resent the deep damnation of his taking of.
They will mourn progress arrested. They
will resent the name OF Liberty taken in vain.
They will deny that the hopes OF mankind
can possibly be fulfilled through wild butch
cry and simple murder. And they will be
right Such was the sentiment Of the people
and press in New York yesterday, and such
it will be elsewhere aud for some time to
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
TEE COURT house ELECTION.

The Court House election takes place to-
aay. There has BEEN so little interest in the
matter that very light vote will be east. Ia
fact, outside of the EAGLE correspondents,
hardly anything has appeared
There are two sides to the question, but
taking il altogether, the fact that we have
no court room, the crowded condition OF
present Offices, the insecurity OF valuable
records and papers, the cheapness Of an adj
dition TO the present building, which, il
erected, will answer all purposes for many
years to come; and the fact that it can b.
built this year, without an increase of take,
over past years, il woull seem both wisdom
and economy TO vote for the levy of tiv,
mills.
There is one argument we have heard
against the erection Of the necessary rooms
and that is that such a building would prove
so convenient and handy to business that the
present generation would never see fine
court house built, while on the other hand
il the addition is not built. the present
building will be sold in few years. and 4
building worthy of the name erection.
While there is no doubt some reason to suc!
a position, still the improved building. being
located on a business street, will never de-
preciatc in value, but will always be salea-
bic.
The EAGLE has not discussed the matter
cdi orally for the simple reason that il is oae
which. if not settled satisfactorily now, can
he called up at any time when the people see
and feel it an imperative necessity.
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
DECLARED OFF.
TEE jar GOULD PEOPLE WiflDRAw AL KAx.
eAB PROPORTIONS.

We must confess that ever since General
Talmage at the head Of several Gould direct
ors met the Santa Fe people at Topeka some
fifteen days since we have entertained grave
doubts touching the construction Of the pro-
posed Missouri Pacific extension from lie
Roy to Wichita. This fact. taken in connec-
ton with Gould's anxiety to obtain an inter-
est in the rich franchise granted the Santa
Fe people by the Mexican Government in
the way Of lands, moneys and other immuni.
ties and fayors, has kept us on the ragged
for a fortnight. But the worst has come.
Talmage writes letter announcing the tenn
porary abandonment OF all the proposed
branches of the Missouri Pacific in this state.
For this there can be for Wichita no speedy
or full compensation. 1t was road, a
through line OF competition most valued anu
desired above all others possibly obtainable
and In its loss we know not what to offer.
The excuse Of the Gould people is attenuat-
cd. In fact it is no excuse at all, and is only
thrown out to cover up the compromise
which really exists back of it,
The following is the official letter:
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY,
GENERAL MANAGERS OFFICE, ST. Louis,
March q, 1ssl.-Dear SIR Being anxious TO
open mp commercial relations with Mexico
at the earliest possible date, and owing TO
the great amount Of work necessary to be
done to effect that result, as well as the diff
Guilty experienced in obtaining material for
construction purposes, our people have con-
cl,ided TO temporarily suspend the building
OF our projected branches in Kansas, and
therefore withdraw all propositions for aid
and right OF way in that State.
A. A. TALMAGE,
General Manager.
There il at least one consolation left our
county and city: We are as well Of as our
ueiehbors, or at least - miserable, with this
redecming fact: that the county nor city has
any railroad bonded indebtedness hanging
over them while many surrounding counties
have run heavily into debt to find after all
that they had failed to secure any COMPETE
ton.
There is left TO US two possible reliefs the
ST. Louis. Fort Scott & Wichita and the con-
struction Of local line from Wichita up be-
tween the rivers II a connection WIN the
Gould system at Mcpherson.
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
sheriT's Sale.

| Distriet ioHri. Seigxirk Comfy. Kansas
James Tiiifnghsst- pIsinEis.
| Arten.isa West. Joseph W West.
/ & 4 siasarf. ID NJ Osborn 4 %
" h Bail. IL 4. sias-, NhzTies Hattss
ard John Edwin Martin. defendants
| b. virsns 81 a. order OF .sle sssusi oct of n.
| District Court Of seiTwisk county, ksnsss
wherein jams "illinghAst i plaintiff, snd Ar
,ruisa West. Jo-ss.h W West. e 4. S;sTsrd
II VI Osborn 4 Co. W X Fail. g. e. siuss
Charles Hs.fon aud John Edwia Nsiiin are de-
f-tilants. will. gu
MosasB. ne ssiA dag II is<ii. 4 o. isrf.
Al O'Clock ", ~ the Court House door, be-
ing a; the frcrf Of the huiitsE< knos : ksSie
Hipc On Douglas Ar~nne. in the esfy % wichita.
Kansas, afsr 20. sals. 1t pg5.ic arcitsn- ~ 9
hl-a~sf bidser for cash 10 hand, alt the right,
title and IL crest Of the dsfsnstants. Artsni>s
osbsrue 4 Co. W & Rail. ~ Z sIass,
Charles Hsssoe xnd John Edwin Martin. In asd
to the follow ing s.escri'sei rial propers sitsaf
in the couats % s~iswick, State Of kan>as, "
ait
The west hall Cd 81 tbs zest Aa.f -; al tbs
soa.h-v~st quarter ~ Of section No. Esne ~
in township fwsufy-sersn tss) ssa b " ranx~ No
south end aud sve ~ acre .rarf 81 :se north
eva. ieastss bsisans a. twsnsf -sss ~ scyss.
being one Annsir~si slas3 n<ss Torta t51 -ssth
and f-yfv ffaj rods ex-I AID wt-f
sAs5 real property fs Ierts5 rg-ea - tss trof-
sTty Of issssdsss Arz<DksA West ard ts-~eph W.
West and Will - soid o. ss:ssfy sai4 ersirf q
ssis-
sasriE. oz.<. wieAi:s. EAs-ss, AArrA u.
HRS aTr.
ShsrsH seASstck osasiy. xAssss
g. e, RzIYses, PlAistiGs Attsrsey ~
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31

District Court. sedgwick county, Kansas.
ID. n. Hamilton, plaintif,
VS..
Robert Brown, Francis Z. Brown, and
W ID, sanders, administrator Of the
estate OF Amy q. smith ,.eceased
BY virtue OF an order Of sale issued out OF the
District Court Of Sedgwick county, Kansas,
wherein ID. n. Hamilton i, plaintiff, and Rob-
ert Brown, Francis Il Brown, and W. ID. San
ders, administrator of the estate Of Amy q.
smith deceased, are defendants, l will, on
Monday, the % day Of May. 4. d. ISL,
at O'Clock z. NJ, at the Court House door, be
ing nj the front Of the building known As Eagle
Block, on Douglas avenue, in the city of " ich-
ita, Kansas O;ier for sale, at public auction, t.
the highest bidder for cash I'm ha nd all the right
title and Interest of the defendants. robert
Brown, Francis r. Brown, and W. b. sanders.
admin strator of the estate OF Amy q. smith
deceased, in and to the following described real
property, situated in the county OF sedgwick,
state Of Kansas, to wit;
The southwest quarter "a OF section No.
twenty-five (22) in township No. twenty six t25)
south of range No. Que ~ east.
said real property is levied upon as the prop
erty of defendants, Robert Brown. Francis +,
Brown, and W ID. sanders, administrator OF
the estate OF Amy u. smith deceased and will be
sold to satisfy said orter of sale.
Sherin's Office, Wichita, Kansas, March 30,
a. ID. ISL.
ii. X. WATT,
Sheriff, Sedgwick county, Kansas.
S,uss 4 Hatton, Plaintiffs Attorneys is
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
SheriF's Sale.


District Court, Sedgwick County, Kansas.
john NJ Allen and W. 4. tucker, part-
ners as Allen Il Tucker, plaintiffs,
VS..
Gustaye Koehler and Rose koehler, de-
PENDANTS.
By virtue OF an order OF sale issued out of the
District Court Of Sedgwick county, Kansas,
wherein John NJ. Allen and W. Il. tucker. part
ners rs Allen 4 Tucker, are plaintiffs. and Gus-
tave koshier and Rose koehler are defendants,
will on
Monday, the I'd day Of May, A. ID. ISL,
at O'Clock r. NJ, at the Court Honss door be
ing at the front OF the building known rs Eagle
Block, on Douglas avenue, in the city of Wich-
ita, Kansas, offer for sale, at public auction. 10
the highest bidder for cash in hand all the right.
title and interest of the defendants, Gustaye
koehler and Rose koehier, in and 10 the follow
ing described real property, situated In the
county of sedgwick, state of Kansas. to wit
The Southwest quarter ca Of section No
twenty mine (s.y la township No. twenty-eight
(as) south OF range No three 60 west, and APP
praised ut $3.50 90.
said real property is levied upon as the prop
crty of defendants, Gustave kCehler and Rose
Koehler aud will be sold to satisfy said order Of
sale.
sherif's Ofice, wich ia. Kansas, March 20.
A. ~ 1851.
IL r. WATT,
Sheriff, sedgwick county, Kansas.
Sluss & Hatton, Plaintiffs Attorneys ID
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
Sherif-s Sale.
District Court. Sedgwick cos,nty, Kansas
William H. Vrooman, Pisinti1.

Distric, Court, Sedgwick coanty, Kansas
william H. Nrooman Pisinti1, 4
John II Nikirk. Poll, r Nikirk. Lewis c
NilIhi,e, George X. shaver james Doran
and The Farmer and Merchsnts' Bank Of
Wichita Kansas
By virtue of an order cf sale issued ont Of tn.
District Court ef sesiswick county, Kansas.
wherein William IL Nroomsa /, pisirtif, and
John n. Nikirk, PoiiyP. Nikirk, lewis c WILL
hite George x shaver James porsn and ~
Farmers aud MerehsGis' Bank OF wichita. Nan
are defendants, viii.
On Mos6ay. he Cad dag q H,y. 4. D, ISL,
A; clock, u. M. . at the Court HOUSE, door be-
ing at the front Of the building known a. axle
Block on Douglas. Aycaue, In the city Of Wich-
the highest bidder for ca h in hanfi all the right
title sad interest of the defendants. John u Nj
kirk. Polly T.. <ikirS. Lewis 4. Ntilhit~. George
k shaver James porAn and The Farmers ard
Merchant Bank az wiehi =, Kansas, in ard Ia
the following described real property. Situated
ia the county OF setgviok. stae ct kansss, to-
wit:
The south half 90 Of the northwest quarter
90, aud the north half ID OF the southwest
quarter ca of section Ne eight ~ in 10 y n.hip
No tsea y seven south Of range No. four "a,
west
Said real property is levied upoa a. the prop
erty 81 the defendants. john n Nlkirk i'Sily 4.
Nikirk, Lewis q WiIisi,e, George X shaver.
James I,oran ssd the Farmers q Aerrhxats Bank
of " ichits. Kansas, AMI VIII ice sold u satisfy
said order Of sale
sheria's once. wichita. Kaa-a.. March -.
H.R, WATT.
sheriff, Seixvick county, Kansas.
VIM. 4. Little, Plaintiff Attorney l-S
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
I.eral Nofica

In the District Court Of sedgwick County,
Kansas.
l'hiletus Durham. Plaintiff
VS..
Charles w Grintile, Defendant.
The above named Charles W Grindle Is hereby
notified that he has been sued by the above named
plaintiff in the District Court Of seslgwick coun-
ty, state of Kansas, and that unless ne answer
the petition Of said plaintiff against him filed In
said action In the office OF the clerk Of raid court
b, the 9Th day of May ISL. said petition will be
taken rs true and judgment will be rendered In
said action In favor OF said plaintiff and against
said defendant for the sum of five hundred and
nincty-four dollars and hfty cents. with interest
the rate OF 10 per cent per annum, and for the
sale of the following real estate, lying and stu
ale in the county OF sedgwick and State OF an
sas, to wit
The northeast quarter Of section three, town
ship twen,v-nine sOuth Of range four wet, under
a mortgage to satisfy said sum Of money, Interest
and Costs Of said action In accordance with ths
prayer of said petition.
ii. &. RUGGLES,
5l4 Plaintiffs Attorney.
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
Election Proclamation.

I, William Greia-nstein, Mayor Of the City o
wichits, Sedgwick County. Kansas, by tn
authority vested in me by law, do hereby max
proclamation to the qualified electors OF sait
City Of Wichita thst there will be held on
Tuesday, the 5fh day Of Aprii, 4. d. ISL.
An election for the purpose of electng the follow
ing officers, 10 wit
Mayor,
Police Judge,
City Treasurer,
Treasurer of the Board Of Education,
| Two t2j Justices OF the Peace,
| Two ~ Goustables,
| One Councilman from the First tisD Ward
vice NJ. Zimmerly, term expires.
One Councilman from the Sr>ond Odd Ward
vice Peter Getto, term expires,
| One Councilman from the Third f3rd) Ward
| vice j. NJ. Allen. term expires,
| One Councilman fr IN the Fourth tithJ Ward
vice II b. kellogg, term expires.
| And the following members OF the Board OF
| Education Of said City OF wichita
| first wari-one member vice c. X. Miller,
| term expires,
Second Ward-one member vice ". l.. Jack
| son. term expires,
| Third ward-One member vice 4. a. HYDE,
term expires.
| Fuurth Wari-One member vice ID W smith,
| term expires.
Also. TO vote upon the following proposition,
| TO wit
| shall the Bosri of Educa ion of the City Of
| Wichita And Schoo! District No one ~ issue
Bonds of said District In the sum of rwenty five
Hundred, 49, 500, thpllars 70 be applied to meet
Deficiencies as fliows, ~ wit
building sidewalks .................. 81 600
10 fins III payment for furnaces ...........- 100
Te remove wooden school -ho1.e aad repair
same. 80
For new bell (arge) ...-... ....l........ 600
Total - ................. $500
those voting in favor Of the school b nds shall
have written or printed on their ballots For
The Bonds -
Those voting against the school bonds shall
have written or printed on their baiiots Against
the bonds. -
/ hereby designate the following named places
in the several wards for holding. AMI tn. fol-
loving named persons 10 their several wards a
Judges aud clerk, Of Election
Fir-t wari--At the Office Of Mills and Stem
Judges, Major hiteman, J. T. Holmes, r.. q.
Nntf, and W. T. Walker aud W L. Viii "a
clerk
second warl-A McMilleu & Ask,s on the
west side of Main street; Jntgcs, J. Alberts.
T. 4. .sigys W. W Ilaines, and Jesse Ask and
". g. Glenn AS clerks.
Third Warl-At IL >chwerifergers taller shop
on essi side Of Main street Judges. A. T. Owens,
u. Richie, J X. stone. ard Il \. Ford, I. L. |
Nixon rs clerks
Fourth Ward At the Occidental. Hotet Brld- |
ing Judges, q. a r Fickeissen. II = Hard |
ing ". r. stem, ani W +. Green, Fraak Fish |
er as clerks.
Resident, Of school District No. one residing |
out ide the city Limit. shall be entitled 10 vote
on the proposition OF issuing school Bonds, but |
for no other purpose
The polls shall be open At nine gu o'clock \. Al.
and closed at siN i6l O'Clock 4 NJ.
Done at wich,s this sist dsy OF March, A. n.
iSsi.
wv. GktIfFENsTEIN.
Mayor.
Pred schxttner,
Jerk
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31

A reference to the debate at the time OF
Mahone's election TO the Senate, shows that
the allegations of Ben Hill, that the Virginia
Senator was acting in bad faith, were entire
iy groundless. MIR. Gibson, of Culpepper,
who voted against him, said, General Ma
hone does not represent the conservative
party Of Virginia; and Mr.. Payne, who also
opposed, said he would ego to the Senate AS
Republican" The Richmond Dispatch, af-
ter his election, declared there was no differ
encc between electing Malone and eiecting
u Republican, and said: "Ile will probably
take rank with Simon Cameron, and be re-
garded as a sort Of Democratic successor TO
old Il; ch Chandler From all this il is plain
that Senator Malone would have disapponi-
ed the public expectation in Virginia had he
acted differently from what he has.
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31

ard Crosby is on record a. asserting that two
religious Journals of this city, distinguished
for their incorporate advocacy Of total absii
hence. and their harsh condemnation Of hi.
practice OF drinking wine with his dinner
are conducted by men who are themselves
habitual wine bbblers. We observe that one
religious journal OF this city suggests the
propriety of a bill of particulars, putting
forth in the same paragraph the charitable
hypothesis that perhaps these religious edi-
tors have been ordered to drink wine by
their family musicians -
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
REV. A. possun AND Gov. 81. yoHs.

To the Edstor # tie Eagle: 20
Last Sunday Re-. Afron PsDum, in Ne
Dog creek colors1 chuzrh, aftes enishiny -
sermon. stepped Apwn n front - the pulpt.
and said: ~ - "a ~
"BRopERs Axo SIeT2RN.-Iexpec' yoos
all heard about d prohibition Iaw dats been
passed by de Leghlstare. Uo6er dat laRr,
If we celebrate de holy sacrament four
weeks from to-day. which we il gwine to do,
your minister is liable to be put in de pene-
pote,,sheary, and dis church locked up rs =
public nuisance Dis church has been very
earnest in de cause OF temperance, aud ycus
heard many times Cat st. John and de Lord
wa, at de head OF dis movement. 1t gins to
| hook ter ME like dat de Lord didn't have
muffin to do vii it. But de Legislature has
made great mistake. We wanted q law dat
would prison every one dat tasted 'toxicat-
in lickers, but we didn't mean de church.
II looks like dc legislature don't know nuftn.
We wanted strict law-one dat would 'pris-
| on de s'loon keepers, and not to prison de
preachers. II pears to me dat Legislature
wild sense enough to shovel sand in rat hole
would a-know'd dat Howsumeyer, We Ia
gwine right on wild de service. law or no
law. Ise held council wild some Oh de min
listers oh de white churches, and we 'cluded
dat IL de world wants martyrs, de church
can furnish dem (amens). 1t pears to me.
though, dat dc churches is largely response
BILE for dis law, and dat 10 some extent takes
de starch Outen de martyr business. How
| sumever, we is gwine to folIew dis thing
right up, and is gwine TO minister de saccra'
ment, law or no law; and wen de preachers
is al! in de prison, we is gwinc to have dc
ment IN our absence and as ! spects to be
absent four weeks from to-day to tend de
funeral Of a brother bout ten miles north OF
here, who is got de small pOx, and will be
dead bout DAT time. de elders will minister
lie sacrament in my absence. Dere is one
thing dat have settled inter my own mind.
and dat is. SO far as dis flock am concerned,
hereafter de Lord will do all de lcaden'; and
il St John want to do anything, he can jist
follow long wild de herd, whar he belong.
have been 'ticalar in desc rem rks SO as to
put dis church right asore de world, seein'
dat broder Farmer DoOlittle is present wild
his Wichita EAGLE 'porter's book"
As the congregation passed out, the elders
| sided up to their minister as though they
wante further information about this mat
\ ter.
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31
SherifS Sale.


District Court, Sedgwick County Kansas
James Tillinghast, Plaintiff,
vs..
William 5 Robinson and Mafinds Rob-
inson, Defendants
By virtUe OF an order of sale issued out Of The
District Court Of Sedgwiek county, Kansas
wherein James Tiiiinghsst is plaintiff, and VI III.
ian : Robinson aud MaiInda Robinson are de
PENDANTS. 1 will, on
Monday. the 25fh ioy Of april. A. d. lssi,
at 2 o'c ock r NJ. at the Court House door be
ing Vt the front Of the building known as Eagie
Block on Douglass avenue In the city Of Wich
ita, Kansas, offer for sale, at public auction, TO
the CHEST bidder for cash in hand ali TIE right
tile aud interest 81 the defendants, Witlian 5
Robinson and Malinda Robinson, in and t. the
following described real property, sitnsrra In
the county Of >edgwick. state OF kassas. To wit
The north east qusrter tt.) OF section No.
thirty CO. in township No twenty-nine t.y
south Of range No. one a. west
said real property Is levied upon ~ the prop
erty 81 defendants. William s Robinson snf
MaiInda Robinson and will he sold to sold 10
satisfy said order OF sale.
siIeIin's Office. Wichita, Kansas, March p,
A u. isSl-
IL. X. WATT,
sheriff Sedgwirk County, Kansas
ii. q RuYsies, Plaintiffs Attorney s.-5
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1881-03-31

The. faierine raies gorern iAe raies II aarer,u,
| IA the Wichita cry Eagle.
Al transient dfrerf.ssnests frsn!y-src cents D..
lac for the s7sf iaserfon; fifteen eeafs per dine fos
eseh subsequent Insertion.
Err-y SsseT,pt,o. of focal. isciaiing Commercial
1dssrfsezisnts. ssteei 10 SPECIAL eeafyset de-
pending upon space ard ieae:h q fine fer Irhi.h
they run
Al isge! sdesrfiscnesis. fseisdisc ftose Of stair
county, CITY fsrEsaip, aise sksyT sSies end ps5-
satt0n R0flces. tie rsies prsHstt5 g. tie s.afufes
Al aassr,entzfs arc eorafsd fhongh ssf in soiie
norpareu, fhs BODY fspe used and isa sss ~ uhick
Constitute square.