Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1881-02-07
DELINQUENT TAX LIST.


and costs, IS 29A
No 3s2-Against John Hunt and the east 40 feet
Of lot T. L and NJ First and Second streets, in the
city OF Sacramento, for tax on personal property
State and county tax, s26 Drainage District No.
tax 81 COSTS 50 So total tax and costs, $50 80.
No 386-Aganst Elmer c. Jordan and the west
half of lot T. and D, Eleventh and Twelfth streets
in the city of Sacramento, and improvements, Tor
tax ON personal property State and county tax,
81 IT; Drainage District No tax, a cents; COSTS
81 O6; total tax and costs, 81 271.
No 393-Against Emma Koppkus and lot Z, X
and L, Fourteenth and Fifteenth streets, IN the city
OF Sacramento and improvements. State and coun-
ty tax 81 rs Drainage District No. tax. 81 224 ;
costs 81 Is; total tax and COSTS $50 ISL
396-Against William Landerkin and the east half
of ot l, and !, Nineteenth and Twentieth Streets
in the city of Sacramento, and improvements, for
tax on personal property. State and County tax,
80 cents; Drainage District No. tax II cents I;
costs, 81 o.; total tax and costs 81 425
No 39s-Against }. J. c. Ledie and lot Z, n and
O. Second and Third streets, III the city of Sacra-
nento and improvements. State aud county tax,
$50 30 Drainage District Nc. tax, 81 Is costs,
a. % total tax and costs, $50 10.
No 4O0-Against Peter Leonard and the east halt
of lot T. o and 2, Twenty first and Twenty second
streets, in the city Of sacramento, and improve
ments and personal property. State and county
tax, g "a Drainage District No. l tax, . cents
COSTS 81 u total tax and costs, IS 90
No. 4O4-Aganst Mrs. W. ?. Lyon and the south
% feet north 80 feet south 40 feet, OF lot l. and
L. Third and Fourth streets. in the city Of Sacra-
mento, and pers nal property. State aud county
tax, SO 66 Drainage District No. tax, Al cents
costs 81 So total tax and costs, Sl2 g.
No. 40S-Against George ". Marsh and east 70
feet west 23I feet OF lot g. and P, Eighth and
Ninth streets, in the city Of Sacramento, and i'm
provements, for tax personal property. State
and county tax 81 80; Drainage District No. tax,
cents costs 81 o.; total tax ana COSTS y Al
No 409-Aganst +. NJ. Marshall and east half Of
lot g. and q, Sixteenth and Seventeenth Streets
in the city OF Sacramento, and Improvements, for
and county
65 GEMS; Drainage District No. l tax, 2 cents /;
costs, 81 03 total and COSTS, 81 1G9
No 4l0-Against Eli Mayo and east half OF lot
and all of lot , j and X, Eleventh and Twelfth
streets in the city OF Sacramento State and county
tan S55 90; Drainage District No. l tax, g 10 !;
costs, 50 40; total tax and costs, sol 40
No 45-Against James Mclaughlin and lots to
s r and S. Nineteenth and Twentieth streets, in the
ei 81 v OF Sacramento, for tax on Improvements.
State and couaty tax, 81 60; Drainage District No.
tax 10 cents; costs % cents; total tax and costs,
No ns-Against Henry D. Meiss and lot 5, II and
l. Sixteenth and Seventeenth streets, In the city OF
Sacramento improvements and personal property.
State and county tax S24 81; Drainage District No.
l tax, 93I cents costs, 3 %; total tax and costs,
No. 42O-Against Frank Miller and south lis feet,
east 50 feet lot 5, NJ and n, Eighth and Ninth
streets, in the city OF Sacramento improvements
and personal property. State ana county tax,
Sl39 10: Drainage District No. tax, Sl6 SO costs,
SIS IS total tax and costs, $40 4oA
No 422-Against John H. Miller and cast half lot
3 J and X, Sixteenth and Seventeenth streets, and
improvements, and west half lot Z, and l., Thir-
teenth and Fourteenth Streets in the city Of Sacra
nento, and improvements, for tax personal
propertv State and county tax, S2l II Drainage
District No. l tax, 49, cents; costs, 81 81 total
tax and costs, S25 154.
No 425-Against W. S Manlove and west half lot
T. H and l. Twenty third and Twenty fourth Streets
in the city OF Sacramento and Improvements. State
and county tax, So 20 Drainage District No. tax
20 cents costs, II cents total tax and costs, So IL
No 432-Aganst Nichols u Co. and lot S, q and
r. FIRST and Second streets, in the city OF Sacra
mento and improvements for tax on personal prop
erty. State and county tax, S27 80; Drainage DIS:
trict No tax, 81 %; costs, 81 Al; total tax and
costs, $50 76. .
of west half of lot 10, B and C, Twelfth and Thir-
teenth streets, in the city OF Sacramento and i'm
provemeuts. state and county tax, IS 20; Drainage
District No. tax, 20 cents costs, a cents; total
tax and costs, So II.
No 437-Against Thomas Ochsner and lot 2, P
and Q, Twenty second and Twenty third streets in
the Guy of Sacramento and personal property state
and county tax, 81 IS; Drainage District No. tax
81 cents costs 81 II total tax and costs, 50 344
No. 43S-Against illam c. Oliver and the south
57I feet Of lots and g. @ and r. Seventh and Eighth
Streets in the city OF Sacramento, and improve
ments, for tax on personal property state and
county tax, 93 cents; Drainage District No. l tax,
81 cents COSTS 81 05 total tax and costs, - O62
No 4S9-Against K. ONeil and lot !, and w,
Second and Third streets, IN the city OF sacramento
State and county tax, 81 cents Drainage D strict
No tax, 81 cents COSTS 81 o. total tax and COSTS
. OG4
No 445-Against Helen NJ. Persons and personal
property. State and county tax S23I OIL Drainage
District No. tax, - 49, costs, So S.; total tax
and costs, $3.50 Al.
No. 449-Against Mary Quanchi and the north 20
feet south 40 feet OF lot l, and y, Third and
Fourth streets, in the city OF Sacramento, aud I'M
provements. State and county tax, So so; Drain
int NJ l toy aarltG ppnfg
total tax and costs, 81 50.
No 450-Agai- st Railroad Company, Amador
branch.
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO May -, 1880.
To Joseph w Houston Assessor OF Sacramento
eounty-Sir: The State Board of Equalization on
the 30th day OF April 1850, assessed for the year
1880 the Amador Branch Railroad Company Tor its
franchise roadway and roadbed in the State Of
California at 1888, 500. The entire length Of main
track OF railway of said company said State Is q
miles, The length of main track Of said railway IN
the county of Sacramento is 10 miles.
The assessed value per mile OF length OF SAID nam
track of said railway as fixed by pro rata dis
tribution OF the assessed value OF the whole prop
erty Of said company in Sacramento county, Is as
follows:
OF franchise per mile, $780, OF roadway, road
bed and rails per mile $4,000.
The apportionment OF the assessment OF said
property by the Board, for and TO Sacramento
county, is as follows
Franchise, assessed value s11 400; tax, s14S 20.
Roadway roadbed and rails, assessed value, SlSS,
100; tax, 81, 445 80.
WARREN DUTToN, Chairman,
D. NJ. KENFIELD,
JAS L. KING,
T. d. HEISKELL,
NJ NJ. DREW,
State Board of Equalization
L. W. MAsLE, Clerk.
Against said franchise, State and county tax,
Sl4S 20; costs, 81 81.
Against said road -way road-bed and rails, State
and county tax, s., 445 30; costs, s122 II.
Total tax and costs, s2724 Is,
No. 451-Against Railroad Company, California
Pacific.
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO, May Is, 1880.
To Joseph W. Houston, Assessor OF sacramento
County-Sir: The State Board OF Equalization, on
the 30th day of April, 1880, assessed for the year
1850 the California Pacific Railroad Company for its
franchise, roadway rails, roadbed and rolling stock,
in the State of California, at 81 sol, 800 90.
The entire length of main track Of said railway in
said State is 112 SLIGO miles.
The length of main track OF said railway IN the
county of Sacramento is 5l-100 of mile.
The assessed value per mile Of the length Of said
track of railway, as fixed by pro rata dlstrl-
button of the assessed value Of the whole property
of said company in Sacramento county, is as follows:
OF franchise, per mile, $1,000 90; OF roadway,
roadbed and rails, per mile, Sll 200 co. OF rolling
stock, per mile, s., Sll IS.
The apportionment of the assessment Of said
ty, is as follows
Franchise, assessed value, 81, 600; tax, S13 CO..
Roadway, roadbed rails and rolling stock, assessed
value, 81 ,005 n; tax, S9l OIL
WARREN BUTTON, Chairman.
D. NJ kENFItLD,
JAMES L. KING,
7. d. HEISKELL,
NJ. NJ. DREW,
State Board Of Equalization.
E. W. MAsLTN, Clerk.
Aga INST said franchse-State and county tax,
S13 co. Drainage District No tax, so cents; costs,
81 II
Against said roadway, roadbed, rails and rolling
stock-State and county tax, s9l OF Drainage Dis
trict No tax, 50 sob costs, 50 q. Total tax and
No. 452-Against Railroad Company, Central Pa
cifc
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO, May 10, 1880.
To Joseph W Houston, Assessor OF Sacramento
County-Sir: The State Board of Equalization on
the Both day of April 1850, assessed for the year
1850 the Central Pacific Railroad Company for its
franchise roadway rails, roadbed and rolling stock,
in the State of California, at SIS, 239, ass
The entire length of main track Of railway OF said
company in said State is Coz miles.
The length of the track of said railway in
the county of Sacramento is Il miles. The assessed
yaue per mile of length OF said main track of rail-
way, as fixed by the pro rata distribution OF the
assessed value of the whole property Of said COM