Mexico weekly ledger., 1881-02-03
CIRCUIT COURT.
ffoeeedings of Audrain Circuit Court,
January term, 1891.


The grand jury returned the fol-
lowing indictments:
| State VS.. Barker, three indictments,
selling iiIsor without license.
| State vs.. Barker, same.
State VS.. Halslip. two indictments.
selling liquor without license.
| State vs. Walker, petit larceny.
State vs. Dye, disturbing public
worship.
State vs.. Spriggs, disturbing public
worship.
st.te vs.. Asbury, disturbing peace
of family.
State VS.. johnson. same.
State vs.. Levaugh, assault with in
tent TO kill.
cAsEssprsposED OF.
Crossman vs.s Hooton, dismissed
,.osI,ssss Spencer vs.: G, A. R. R. Co.,
Quigley vs.. Mexico Southern Bank,
verdict for plaintiff, $234.76.
! Carson vs.. Keetdn, verdict for
plaintiff s2l7.2e.
Rollius VS.. Mcintyre, costs by
consent.
Carson vs.. Woodward, judgment,
s4O0.
! G"nter vs.. Campbell, dismissed at
| plaintiffs COSTS.
White VS.. Keeton, verdict for plain
tiff, SAP.
Woolwine VS.. Burchard, judgment,
S234.37.
! Brown ct al vs. Howe ct al, verdict
for plaintiff, $500.
Bigges vs.. G. & A. r. r. Co., ver-
dict for defendant.
City of Mexico vs.. Cauthorn, dis
missed, court having no jurisdiction.
Board VS.. Craig, ct al. continued
by consent.
Beck vs.. Beck, decree of divorce,
mutual.
Pratt VS.. Hutchison ct al, order OF
sale
Tally ct al VS.. Tally ct al, order
of sale.
Allen vs.. G. & A. R. R. Co., yer.
die, for $3.50
/ State VS.. Dye, fine 50 and costs.
Reddington ct al vs.. Willinghan
et al, continued at plaintiffs costs.
Haislip vs.. Haislip, dismissed al
plaintiffs costs.
Dobyns vs.. Wade, judgment fol
defendant.
Hathaway vs.. Haislip, continued
Roe vs.. Dudley, continued.
Dawson VS.. c. & A. R. r. Co.
verdict for plaintiff, $40.
State VS.. Asbury, plea not guilty
recognizance 5000.
State VS.. johnson, plea not guilty
recognizance 5000
. State VS.. Levaugh, plea not guilty
recognizance S400.
Walace VS.. G. & A. r. r. Co.
verdict for plaintiff $50.
Sulllnger vs. c. & A. r. R., yer
dict $40.
+ Terry VS.. c. & A. R. R. Co., yer
dict $40.
State vs. Spriggs, plea gnilty, s
fine and costs.
n Botkln VS. Mcintyre, amended
+ statement filed and continued at de
, PENDANTS cost.
Galloway vs Runkel, leave to an
swer and continued.
D Tureman vs. Stephens, leave t
:, amend petition, answer in so days an
r. continued.
. Welch vs. Smith, continued.
Vincil vs C. & A. Ry., continued.
n Burchard vs. noller, continued.
a Moller VS. Burchard, continued.
!. Ferguson VS. Jones, continued +;
:, defendants costs.
Coils vs. Green, judgment by a
: fault. Sl17.60.
a State VS. Barker, No. /, fine 81
l. and costs; Nos. 2 and 8 dismissed
Il defendants costs.
Toalson vs. Crews, verdict ft
" plaintiff, $3.50.
n Galbreath VS. French, continued
e plaintiffs costs.
|. Jenness VS. Jenness, divorce, deere
10 for plaintiff.
Cudworth vs. unknown heirs Of l.
! rue, interlocutory judgment and CO..
'e linued.
er Simmons VS. Spiers, costs paid an
q. dismissed without prejudice
~ Carroll VS. c. & A. Ry., appe
dismissed.
u. Graves VS. Mastin, continued.
1e " hite vs. Duvanney, dismissed
ss plaintiffs costs without prejudice.
n Eckerlv VS. Smith, judgment by d
fault. $251.1O
State vs. Weir, mol. pros.
III johnson vs. Harrison. non suit.
Smith VS. Shell, damages for plai
tiff, $16Q.
!. Lyons VS. French, dismissed I
az want of prosecution.
ne GorGon vs. Ritenour, motion
Of strike out answer overruled and co
ch tinued at defendants costs.
"a Mills vs Burchard, continued
plaintiffs cost for want of notice
e. appeal. -,
ed State vs Haislip, No. 1, plea guilt
q; fine $40 and costs; Nos. 2, 3 and
ho dismissed at defendants costs.
49, Gentry VS. Stivers, decree for pla
W tiff.
Ter Turner VS. Dunn, interlocutc
,ra Judgment and continued.
nd Pearson vs. G.. & A. Ry., cont
cor ued.
ng 1913. What does it mean!
'o' Mexico Medical Society.
OF Audrain County Medical Soci
met at DR.. T. P. Rothwell's off
DR.. Keeton in the chair, Dr.. Sincl
ow secretary pro tenn.
,rv Report of Treasurer, DR., w.
~, Macfarlane, was received aud