Iron County register. [volume] (Ironton, Iron County, Mo.) 1867-1965, 1881-07-21

it was his own money he gaveto Bradley.
If Bradley is guilty Of perjury. the pre-
sumption il almost equally strong that
he conspired with Speaker Sharpe to
commit perjury in order to defeat the
candidacy of Mr.. Depew, and incident
ally to ruin Sessions. IL Bradley's
story is established, the presumption
that Mr.. Depew himself was party TO
Sessions crime will become very strong.
though not Overwhelming. On the
other hand. if Bradley's story Is shown
TO be false. the presumption will be
equally strong that persons much high
er and more Important in the Repub-
licau party than Speaker Sharpe were
engaged in the conspiracy to defeat
Depew by suborning Bradley TO swear
falsely that money had been paid him
to vote Tor Depew. That is - say. it
is almost certain either that Republic
an candidate for the United States
Senate and Republican State Senator
conspired to commit bribery, and that
the Republican State Senator perjured
himself rather than confess the bribery;
or that Republican candidate for
United States Senator and the Repub-
lican Speaker of the Assembly con-
sPired to suborn a Republican Assem-
blyman to commit perjury. As the
latest DEVELOPMENT Of party OF great
moral ideas this display is equally edify-
ing, whichever theory We adopt
As matter of evidence the proba-
bilities are in favor of Bradley's story
as against the story of Sessions. Brad
lev appears to be decent sort OF man
as Republican Assemblymen go. Now
Barabbas was q robber." Moreover,
p,a So all ., - - s,,u :, rl.S
would be put forward to carry out
conspiracy OF the kind of which he is
accused. He is not q hardened politician,
and it would seem quite out of the
question that he could or would be re-
lied upon to take false story before
committee and maintain IL under cross
examination. Of Speaker Sharpe also it
is bare justice to say that there is nothing
| in his career which gives any color TO
the charge that he would be guilty OF .
conspiracy, not merely to defeat Depew
for the Senate-which he would no
doubt conspire to the limits of the
statutes and the Decalogue to debut
to de eat him by bringing false &C
cusation of bribery indirectly against
him and directly against Senator OF
the State. The improbabilities against
the theory that Bradley's story was con-
cocted between Speaker Sharpe and
| himself amount to Hat incredibilities.
| The attempts to show that the Speakers
testimony is unlikely to be true are
simply silly cavils. The oh. ections are.
first, that it is unlikely that such story
could have been told, for the first time,
in five minutes. and next, that II was
unlikely that the Speaker should have
taken memorandum of the number CT
the notes unless there had been some
previous collision between himself and
Bradley. Neither of these objections
has any weight. Much less than five
minutes would have suiliced to put the
| Speaker in possession of the facts and
! to enable him to count thirteen bank
notes. The making of the memoran-
dunn was an ordinary precaution such
as any honest person of business habits
would have taken on receiving a depos-
it of the amount which Bradley handed
to Sharpe. for whatever purpose it had
been handed to him. '.'
On the other side there arc no such
difficulties. In the first place there Is
no difficulty whatever on the score OF
character. Nobody has suggested that
Mr.. Sessions is an unlikely person to
bribe his fellow legislators. His famil-
iarity with the verb to bride" both in
the active and the passive voice is not
disputed. In fact, the argument that
is most relied upon is that it was pre-
cisely because his familiarity with
bribery was So great that he would not
have been likely either TO bride the
wrong person or to pay bride before
the delivery of the vote which he had
bought. There is no doubt some
weight in this argument. 1t is surpris-
ing that such an expert should SO have
bungled such job. But the evidence
that he did bungle it is SO complete
and conclusive that an antecedent i'm
probability that he should have
bungled it cannot be pleaded
against such evidence. Painful rs IL is
to have to impute perjury either to
Bradley or to Sessions. it is proper to
bear in mind which Of them Is appar-
emily the more likely person to commit
perjury 1t is also proper to bear in
mind the difference between perjuring
yourself in order to injure another. and
perjuring Yourself in order to get your
self out of n scrape, and how much
stronger n temptation would be requir-
! ed TO the former ofense than to the lat
Ter. The conclusion of all impartial
men who read and consider the testi-
mony that has been taken must be that
Bradley told the truth.
All these things increase the moral
pressure upon decent and self-respect-
| ing members of the Legislature, who
wish neither to bribe nor to be bribed,
to 90 home and leave the Senatorial
vacancies to be filed by the people OF
the State. Only in this way can they
make sure that any candidate who may
have tried TO bribe his way into the
Senate OF the United States shall not
secure the votes which he has purcbas-
ed.-N Y. World.
lit is the suggestion az q Cincin-
natl paper: General Moves "a 'hhger-
ing at Versailles. The General should
hasten home to fill the vacuum in poll
tics made by the retirement OF Dorsey"
The retirement of Dorsey This is
much too previous. The great Dorsey,
the inimitable organizer. The savior of
Indiana, the lauded and dined and saint