Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1881-02-08
COURT.

The following business was transacted in
the District Court yesterday:
FEBRUARY TERM-JUDGE RIvEs PRESIDING,
r. Sadler VS.. Hoosac Mining COMPANY
| The demurrer herein overruled. and defend.
ant given twenty days to file its answer.
Stefano Zergo VS.. Ed. ~Raum-Ordered,
That this case be set for trial by jury.
Monday. February %, 1881.
j. G. Ford VS.. Pine Bernardi-Ordered,
That this case be tried by jury Monday,
February 20, 1881.
Jos. Ii. Hoegh VS.. Hoosac Mining Co.,
Ordered, passed until second setting of the
calendar.
T. l.. Conran VS.. J. Compton ct al.-De.
murrer herein submitted and taken under
advisement; ordered, set for trial by Jury,
March /, 1881.
Conran VS.. Compton ct al.-Demurrer
generally sustained plaintiff allowed such
time to amend complaint as he may require;
defendant ten days after complaint is fled
to answer.
Thomas Delay VS.. Bowman Mining
Company-Demurrer herein stricken out
by consent; plaintiff given ten days to file
amended complaint and the defendant given
10 days thereafter to file its answer.
P. w. Eoff VS.. j. A. Nesbitt ct al.-De-
murrer heretofore filed herein is withdrawn.
and defendants given five days to answer,
and cause set for trial by jury February
18th, 1881.
T. r. Hutchinson vs. Chas. Sachaloris-
Ordered set for trial by Court Tuesday,
February 23d, 1881.
Chas. Sachaloris VS.. E. 4 p. r. r. Com
pany-Passed by consent until the second
setting of the calendar.
w. S. Mcclellan VS.. Jos. Mendes-Or-
dered passed on calendar. Ordered cause be
tried by jury Tuesday, March LIST.
st. Lawrence Mining Company vs.. Rich
mond Mining Company of Nevada. -
Plaintiff moves for judgment o n grounds of
frivolous demurrer motion overruled, to
which plaintiff excerpts. Demurrer herein
submitted and overruled, and defendant
given until March IL, 1881, at IL o'clock
M, to file and serve its answe
- Minnucianni vs.. Matt. Kyle.-Or-
dered placed on calendar. By consent, de-
murrer withdrawn, and defendant given
ten days to file his answer. Ordered, That
this cause be tried by jury Tuesday. March
l, 1881.
Simonetti VS.. Tomassino Guissepi 4 Co.
and John Tore intervenor-Ordered
placed on the calendar, and tried by jury
Tuesday, March LIST, 1881.
Jos. Allen VS.. r. Sadler- Ordered placed
on calendar. By consent demurrer with
drawn and defendant given 10 days to file
answer; cause to be tried by jury Tuesday,
March LIST, 1881.
r. Richard VS.. Albion Mining Company
Ordered, that an attachment issue forth
with against JOS. Potts, returnable this
day at 2 o'clock P. NJ, requiring him to
then appear before the Court, at the Court
room, then and there to show cause why he
should not be punished for contempt for
his refusal to admit N. Wescoatt and one
assistant to certain portions of the Albion
mine, as he was directed so to do by an
order Of the Judge of this Court hereto
fore made.
Richmond Mining Company VS.. Albion
Con. Company ct al.-Ordered, That an
attachment issue forthwith against Joseph
Potts and John Williams, returnable at 2
P. M, this day, requiring them to
then appear and show cause why they
should not be punished for contempt for
violating the injunction heretofore issued
in this cause.
Richmond Mining Company VS.. Albion
Mining Company Ordered, That Baker
4 Wines be added as attorneys of record
for defendant.
st. Lawrence Mining Co. VS.. Albion
Mining Co.-Same order.
Richmond Mining Co. VS.. Albion Mining
Co.-Same order.
r. Richard VS.. Albion Mining Co.-Same
r. Richard VS.. Albion Mining Company.
Upon hearing of this cause ordered that
Jos. Potts be fined the costs Of these pro-
ceedings.
Richmond VS.. Authenticated hearing
continued until such time as sur
vevs can be made to determine the line be-
tween the conflicting grdnnds.
Ordered, that a venire issue for "a per-
sons to appear and act as Grand Jurors,
at 4 o'clock P. NJ, of this day,
and ordered that a venire issue for so per-
sons to act as trial jurors for the February
term, returnable February 2Sth, 1881, at
10 o'clock A. NJ.