National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1881-01-25
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,

On On motion of M. AttQrney:GeneraI Devens, Mr.
tharleS T. Abel esq, Of Washington, D. G., was ad-
ON motion Of Mr. W. A. Marry. Edgar w. Mann
esq of Cheyenne, Wyoming, was admitted to prac-
On motion Of Hon. B. H Hill. William Brfnlzerhoff
esq o. Jersey CITY " j.. was admitted to practice.
laHt, IS. Bernard Burnstine Appeal from the SII-
pfelIe Court Of the District of Columbia Decree re-
NeSed with costs and renlanded with directions
Ihal an account be taken well of the sums actually
loaned or paid by Burnstine upon the policy as Sc
for the purpose of keeping the policy in force and for
sEch decree as may be in conformity with the opinion
Oh ms court. Opinion by Nh. Justice Harlan.
Rodgers Locomotive and Machine Works: No. Is,
IptOn County, plaintiff in error vs. Norton Slal9h-
Ter " 70 No. Upton County, plaintiff In error
vs. j. T. Edmunds & Co. Judgment affirmed, with
coStS and interest Opinion by Mr.. Justice Harlan
No 49, G9tilIeh Craner plaintiff in error VS. c. A
arthur, collector, dc. In error to the Circuit Court
OF the United states for the Southern District of New
~, oFE: Judgment affirmed. with costs Opinion by
i2n Proctor el al Appeal from the Circuit Court of
the United states for the Southern District of
demanded with directions to proceed in con-
nIhliy with the views of the court as they
Opinion by 6Ir. Justice Bradley -'"'
s 40. 10; H. c : Hartman plaintiff in error vs.
aIs :; lIfeehhow treasurer, &c. In error to the
SUPREME Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia
Judgment reversed, with costs and cause remanded
nGtieI proceedings to be had therein, in conform
ny Win the opinion OF this court Opinion by Mr
justice Field Dissenting, Mr.. Justice Miller
Smelling Company al Appeal from the s19reme
court OF Utah Territory. Decree reversed with costs
anu CtoSt Tenanded with directions TO send it to the
District Court for hearing the parties To he at
10y 10 produce new proofs. Opinion by Mr. Justice
No, No IL Clement A Auffn Ordt, ir., ct al. appeI
the E H iaFf ~ IL, RSln assignee &c Appeal from
Gtulcl Of New York Decree affirmed with costs and
interest Opinion by Mr.. Justice Miller anu
~ IL George H Sharpe. plaintiff in error Va
Ecilael L. DOyleet al In error TO the SUPERIOR Corr
costs ~ ~ %! NeM YORK Judgment reversed with
anu cause reInanded 10 said Superior Court for
Iiher proceedings to be had therein in conformity
Nj me opinion OF this court. Opinion by Mr. Justice
p No. IS Halet Kilbourn plaintiff in error vs. John
~ iR9lSoh ct al In error to the Supreme Court of
c ce DstrIct OF Columbia. Judgment reversed with
costs, and cause remanded for further proceedinrs
OplI0n by Mr. Justice Miller
No 10 William NJ; Springer, plaintiff in error vs.
e lnited States for the Southern District of illinois,
"E!9lie!ls affirmed Opinion by Mr.. Justice Swayne
NO, rs James Z. Ogden. plaintiff in error VS. The
ttuity OF Dayless In error to the Circuit Court of
ne United States for the Western District of Mis-
S JtHqgment affirmed with costs. Opinion by
Td5 i91 Heb Ward plaintiff in error, VS.. Joseph O.
e United States for the Eastern District of Arkan-
-; Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest
Ot:iion by Dir. ChefJustice Waite
{ ID n.' The Life Association of America William
Sify neeL superintendent insurance department of
IalSSour and Daniel NJ. StrOst special agent apueI-
CrS1i, ~ samuel f. bundle ct al Appeal from the
court OF the United States for the District of
1ns1,ii Decree reversed with costs, and cause re-
A. VIZ Hith directions to proceed according to law
sun Wltnln Its jurisdiction
NJ IL En-, Opnon by Mr.. ChiefJustfce Waite
q Eo.!- JoSeph b. Stewart appellant VS. Hamilton
~: thief Justice Waite ~
ra ~ % Inc II. Louis Smelling and Refining Com
ham EiiTn lnerror, VS.. Thomas Kemp and vii
r5 NO ~ The St Louis Smelling and Refining Com
Tor ~ IN error, VS.. Sarah Ray ct al Assigned
'O5 1901 OF call Oh March II 7
Sat- iIS'. J. r Weber, plaintiff in error vs. The
Nsrcl,99l Virginia. Assigned for foot of call on
take T mel Justice announced that the Court would
february d 'S " 'iuaig d. UNTIL MONDAY,
S.o,s " Edward 1. Keyes. appellant vs. The limited
Ian an 9HDmItted by Mr.. NJ H. Carpenter for appel-
Lee 1,,5 ny Mr. AttOrneyGeneral Deyens for appel-
-. under twentieth rule " "PP0A
Blrti OIIl$inal EX-parte I'm the matter of John H
argHad IN Iohn NJ Graft Petition for mandamus
10 10y! lila nlr. A j. Todd in support offs same
IEIre ~ harvey Terry appellant, vs. John J. Nc
deandieDtt IFer' dc Argued by Mr. Harvey Terry for
Nv hg yes and W. L. Earle - ~ ~
Thomas ne City of Chicago, plaintiff in error vs.
plsintf1T iiiley submitted by Mr.. W. c. GOudy for
fndan. IN N error and by Mr.. NJ. w Fuller for de-
M INA "a error under twentieth rule
Civ of % iAomitS Iilley, plaintiffin error vs. The
for uain,aSS::-So 81 al. Submitted by Mr. NJ w Fuer
C. WILL! IN error, and by Mr. w. c. Goudy and Mr.
teth rpIn ior defendant in error under the TWEEN
HindeS0ner a !. Kern plaintiff in error vs. f w
p!ailfiSI Per et al. Submitted by Mr. r. Walker for
No -, AZ - SS!TOr, under the twentieth rule
Kinda. 1IarleS Kern ct al appeIIanfs We r w
aprqIa,o'LeL ct al. Submitted by Mr. H. Walker for
5i.'ilts, under the twentieth TnIe " - +O
''"iiieu until to-day at twelve O'Clock,