, 1881-06-23

;=-----=-=-
yond question. 1t will In 10 nxain II ptuhibl.
t1o,i Is adopted III I,utIaI,a, Wn viii liayo n
provision III our Constitution w]Icl, viii rot
Ing nitIiat kin1" ~'' "''' ss' ''S''
"l)n sol. tlilnk st,cl, n proy!sjon I'm Stotc
Constitution would lu. III harmony with tho
c"'fIlntISn y, Ito Of Ne ua!!sa siate$ S .
,mwer to co,,tiscai6 tn % nr,,erfv i" % ~ ts citi.
zGlls wll0 uro Engaged III lawful trNtv,
Nettller cu!, tho Fctlera! tloyernnei,t do 10.
'Flin manufacturers 1T vll,os n1ld. spir,uu,ls
lEUuors pay nj, ilntneso ravellso for tl,n sllp-
celvG. ntltt nru untitlc To rercfvc It's fill and
c0lll,leta protection, ThUru il tll,j III tic
Citypf Terro lIaatn Intlone, by tlle distlllers
To tt} this The mailifrfi tns ,nvn tnnfin In RIM,
Investments aMl purchased extensive aid
v9!.ianle property, reAl MID personal. Thy
untot ~ ., ~ praaMl nfn;lli,n!ory nneilt!
tiscnia Mi s,,"j nt,,riv " ~. ,,anrv W. ~ o,,,1
destroy tl,lijions low M ,,,o iitItlef fho or.,.
tectIQil Of law ns al,y species ni property. III
NY Judgment tho Courts will not sustain
s"S ~ Wi,nt naiost mst, ,nr ,.t.,,,. -, ,.x,, i,
mittjnr The rrohfbilorv omr,,,1mS1,t. to n votn
Of tho pcuplu ,"
III ne measure Is unconstitutional. MS i
vs peesp Il ri, 10 of am !lestttict!yg 9t rriynte
,,,I,sa md trobn ~ ss,liit,m ~ @sH ~ ~ e ;,sn SH-
jar vote. OF COURSE, / npprGclnto tic arr,s-
nient TINT everything cNii bo snfely submit.
tett TO tie ncopIe, but WHY SHOULD measure
,stt,,l9, ~. ~" =, aesa ~, ~, vlnat,on o. te
II Tie peouio sulliJ iindHr nxciinmnnt M S mi
,nlaapprehonsor, vote far It, aji thajr lolMr
ai,u trouble would nvall nothing; tho Courts
""'iM q IL, MiIt9 s,,I.a} !. w. =
nrrn,,rn c m Ia w sSt Sp 1k !s m Gauss OF
"i}y education. aud liz ee1ierai ;mproyc:
mentof, tho people. Nothing was eyer nc
GoaMplisiieH SOY l py slllnptlary laws. You cn!!
rat Of rnH y ,av WGt t n tfai'n sa
III ~ 'asiols al.a 9nn knep tug business tn prudent
ailt fespoilsao!o llall1s; but beyond this fegts
"t1on VIII 1all'"
Coorctve rc,nn.r..co xo-,h c..,...
Marshal Robert Dougias, Of North Caro-
ai with tho following @ Itelcstlnw n statsnnt msr
of tho ox.ont IN ,vhtch tha noore,vo sms .o,mnns
ahce qdesuon Will enter as MI issltc, md
probably control the fall election In that
State:
sour nextelectEon comes ofrin October, and
u,oa Mo q IL wnskyw'tho'treEarl to pol.
ltics u mo issue. The last Legislature pnsscd
Ky, or Intoxicating beverages generally, with
IN Tue limits OF tto Statc.-thus reyoklng the
Wlo'o system OF license which las obtained
from time lmmemorlnt. 1t was, however,
provided 1T the bill that the now act should
not te considered binding until ratified bv a
a'u,Ns t,a u wa peopse OF d. We oate, ana llore
uo nent comes III. The fact is that tic
churcl. folks nro strongly in favor Of tic law,
md ato working tootll aid nall and hrlncinv
Mi noasiho tnGva"a ~ - ,'"'t t,an a." u.ns s. lug
~ ra.t'tnJ nh a"uneo ,,u ~ ucat " nmfo
:. 49, i"sl'leu' lho liquor anu personal-ltb-
cry men have proJntlfced thclr cass very
rcsOrted to- wl,sn tlloIr barrfcadI.s Wcre eHs ny
tackled. They called q jtouor convent1on.
md passed resolutions, and drew straiEhf
line between free whisky and limited wills
take. It ia a plain question In soniai c nhiIns.
opty. Tlora nre !, great many r1en az mall
ernte drinking habits In thIB country, but Gf
conservative notlony, who wifi taks ;,;r