The Colfax chronicle. [volume] (Colfax, Grant Parish, La.) 1877-1981, 1881-12-03

No 1873 o. S.-Zeline Layssard VI. Sheriff
of Grant parish ct al, compromised.
No. 6-S. b Shackelford va. w. s. Cal
houn ct al. Judgment for plaintiff in the
sum of $3.50, divided thus: w. s. Calhoun
to pay $3.50 and Mrs. ". VI. A. Lane to
pay S2400- each to pay their pro rata of
the costs of suit. with five per cent inter-
est from date Of Judicial demand.
AZ O. S.-los Hoy 4 Co. ]. NJ. Henshaw
transferee, VS.. g. W. Hickman, compr'ed.
122-Martin Wheeler W. NJ. f. Machen,
Judgment for defendant.
l28-Carrie b. Sallibellas. executrix, etc.,
W B. +. Bryant compromised.
l30-C II Teal ct al We L j Pirtle. In
this case the court rendered the following
opinion and decision: "In making up the
account, which here render as part of my
ju dgment, ! satisfied every opposition
made by the defendant to the report of the
experts, except item of said opposition of
$3.50 due Numford. which Opposition
override for the following reasons: lst-
considered the accounts "G" and &c G.
as if they were the accounts of Pirtle,
although they were made against the
steamboat Lila. in favor of Mumford. be-
cause Mumford, in his own handwriting.
wishes them 80 placed Consequently I
consider them Pirtle's and not Mumfo, d's.
I'd II deducted from said accounts all
charges for money, because P.rtle was
credited for all money paid out by him on
the boat, and ii c.edittd him with this
again, it would be a double entry of the
same 30-Al items in accounts ss0n and
Il g., NAKED by me b opposite the
items I have also deducted. A few items
sold to hands on the boat, marked by me
B d ON the accounts, have already dedac-
ted, because, ii Pirsle has kept the ac-
counts correctly, the items were deducted
from the wages Of the hands when they
were paid, and consequently he he is al
ready credited with them. The bar rent,
500. have taken no note of, as 10 evil
dence shows it to have been collected BY
Pirtle, and it is still due the boat. Where
fore, l render Judgment against T. J. Pirtle
for $17l ca, as shown by account marked
A B, stated by me. reserving to Pirtle his
charges for salary A. clerk Of the boat for
SIX months, which he says amounts to
$3.50; the evidence shows this is only to
be collected by the officers when the boat
has been paid for. which the evidence also
shows IL not yet the case. further sustain
the attachment hereiu, with costs. dis
solve the partnenhip, to take effect the
18th dav Of May, 1851.
18Th. MoKnigt VS.. J. B Mccoy. judg
ment for plaintiff.
139-Joe Jones VS.. George Brent, judg-
ment for plaintiff.
14S-W. A. Lotion VI J. N. Rucker,
| judgment for plaintiff.
$50 Philip Bernsteili Va. Hart. Hyde,
| Judgment for defendant.
49, Isaac Hall VS.. VIM. Boyd, judg-
meut for plaintiff.
158-Mrs. A. e. Deal va. Alexander Arm
strong. judgment for plaintiff.
160-Dunn 4 Mccain vs.. y. F. Fletcher,
Judgment for plaintiff
l64-J. D West W. M. F. Mashen, judg-
ment for plaintiff.
| CASES DTsSussEp.
93-M II A Lane VS. w L Richardson.
95-Same.va @ c Nash.
l29-C H Teal ct al Va c H Mumford,
dismissed and new trial granted
1f-G W Lane vs. David Reed.
l42-W w Handlin vs. b Shackelford.
1870 H Teal VS. Travis Johnson ct II.
l44-H v Mccain 4 Bro VS. d w Collins,
49, Mcknight 4 McNeely vs. 8 Davis.
l5l-JW Johnston VS. Jacob Roth.
152-E @ Randolph Us H Smith, W
Johnston 1T 81 intervenoss.
l57-lsaac Hall VS. J w Johnston.
| l6l-G w Bolton vs. Blackwell.
CASES coNrIxUxD.
No. 5--nsn1 Fletcher VS.. H. NJ Jefer.
| I6-Sfate VS. Jno. X. Gray
s3-W = Calhoun W. H Mcknight ct al
64-Leopold Lecoamb vs.. w. s. Cal
houn ct al
75-Morris Kraft vs. n r. Machen.
94-Mrs. Lane vs. Elizabeth Mcknight.