The Redwood gazette. [volume] (Redwood Falls, Minn.) 1873-1940, 1881-01-13

January Term Of Court.
The January term of court met on Tues
day. the 4lh inst. his Honor Judge Cox
presiding.
The following cases were disposed Of:
The Stale OF Minnesota VS.. john Pierce
On showing by County Attorney of the
uncertainty of conviction, mol pros. en-
tered.
In the case Of thu State Us. W. II. Hawk.
charged vita ,mb> element. the jury.
after Laviny considered the case f.om
Saturday evening until II O, 10 k Sunday
night, and being unable to agree, ", re
is.harg. d. Wailin for State; Baldwin,
Miller 4 Morrill, for def, n,.ant.
The State of Minnesota VS.. fr, ,leri,
INN 1 WIS cont uued.
The State of Minnesota IS Gustav Sal d.
beg Appeal from justices ourt. Isu;
Of law judgment of cour; taken und r
Amusement. Wallu for Site: Mathews
& Andrews and II. ID. BALDWIN for .e.
f.nd,n.
The State If Mi,n,s.ta VS.. Gustav
Sanlb ry and Paul Sanduuisl. Appeal
from Justices court. Judgn, mt of court
below reversed. Wali:n ,or State; Mat
ihews s. Andrews and H. ID. Baldwin for
del .ndants.
. Tne village of Walnut Grove VS.. Paul
Santquist. APP al fr, m Justices court.
SIZE OF law. Motion TO dismiss appeal
, arg lcd, and i, is agreed that thr case be
days. Thoro for prosecutor; Matthews
s. Andrew and II. d Baldwin for de-
fcndant. \ SIMILAR ,rd,r was made in
six ot.ier cases o. a like nature against
various other parties from Walnut Grove. ]
james Arnold vs.. Bishop Go. don ct al
[This case was not tri because Judge
Cox had be, n in it as coansel ut one time.
James Braley vs.. Joseph Steves. Set.
tied and dismissed by plantiI. WebbeI
for plaintiff; Wallin for defendant
JOHN Gamer, api .ellant VS. J. C. Dun.
can. rc pendent. Appeal. Questions OF
law. Argued submitted and taken un
der adviscm mt. Baldwin. NJ Her & Nor
rill for plaintiff; Wallin for defendant.
Thos. Campbell vs.. The mona & St
Peter r. r. Co. Continued.
! W. G. Ellslcr VS.. Eab. Watson. Con
tinued.
Mary Lusrher VS.. G orse w. Bral y
Continued Until next adj j,urncd term.
john r Fitch, respondent. rs. .Geo,y e
Ferry, app liant. Appeal Que tons oI
law. Judgment OF cour, below reversed
TIL rp fo: respond Mt: Libby for appel
liant.
Rcdwo Il Co. vs.. II. ". Lam1crton
Answer in tax case. Continued.
Redwood Co. vs. M.rsar.,t d. Paxto Il
Answer in tax aSe. To be submit d OF
lief in thirty days. Wallin f ,r pl..iatiff
Paxton for defendant.
y. Turrcll vs.. Board of c.. C,mmr rs
Settled. Paxton for plaintiff; Wallin so
defendant
James NJ. H II but vs. AL j. Port r
Argued an submitted. L wis for plain
tiff; Davis for defendant.
Joel P. Thompson vs.. J. j. Currier e
al. Verdict for plaintiff 500. Stay fo
sixty days to prepare case AMI bill of cx
ceptions. Wallin for plaintiff; Baldwin
Miller & Morrill, for defendant.
Joseph Pierce, respondent, VS.. C. r
Kneeland, appellant. Appeal. To b.
submitted to the court. TAorp for r.
spondent; Morrill, for appellant.
! Josiah Pierce, respondent. VS.. c. r
Kneelaud, appellant. Continued.
Paul Tilnin vs.. Nels P. Nelson. Ap
peal from Justices court. Law and ia t
Case continued to next term.
Angus Mcdonald, Alexander Laughlil
and JAS. A. Sexton vs. c. Whelan. Con
tinued to next term.
. Personal TAX JUDGMENTs.
, Judgments were rendered against {,
following persons. who made dafa ilt i
answer to personal tax citations: Jaco
, Palmer. jr.. NJ. r. Moore. Harvey Moore
) Peter r ubideau., James Kennedy. d. W
Paul. A. w. Read. Maria ScAenck. G.
Conley. Albert Small, Thomas Campbell
Wills Way. Alonzo Lamphor, Olin {
Lafiin. Elmira Parker, w. H. C.latman
y Charles Moses, John ". Lewis, Dariu
Pierce.
The new village council met this wc;l