New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1881-03-17
LOCAL MISCELLANY.
WITNESSES IN THE YoUNGs CASE.

49, -, .,,,.Sr pEpUDATED BY TBEoPBLUS
xorvcs,s DAUGHTER AND sTEPDAUGHTER.
Several important witnesses were examined yes.
ks 5Say j in sas fhs first two q
Rcston' and MIR. Seaman. of Baltimore I9,
were produced BY Henry YSungs ana tRey s When
identified the claimant as lneopnus MAJ Florence
Miller he wa" Was called to the stand by C. Elliott Minor
Mr. Youngs's lawyer. She testified win evioens ~
g TSseonbins Yonngs, being the DAUGHTER OF Mrs
Mary Youngs by former marriage. and. scanning
the claimant who was pre net ar stepfatheT. The
counsel then bade the claimant stand up anu
submit TO an examination of his skull py IaS
witness. The latter ran h his head sb but could
not fluid the large eGgshapeo scar Mal co.. Neitber
YonnQs was known to have on that spot Ns n LII;
cS Sin spe h mnu by Mr. Drake who ap
pcared on behalf of Henry Youngs the wen'sS was
1SsS ot TO t6 s1a9 sSs admitted that
three scars on the spots indicated, but they were
very small and nothing like her stepfathers. Sno
claimed that the only pGnt Oh yNneas was the lips
and that tne atters hair was darker ana us nhnd
tacne lighter than the claimants She was ash1e
whether there was any peculiarly ABOUT ne' BUOY
Yesd She replied; "they were very short down
10 I'LL iim.nt onened his mouth and showed set
of teeth corresponding with this description.
All" exclaimed the witness. IN na i've xea ae1
Llacker still you won't deceive me-. .,., -
Mr. CASSIDY, of Boston, testified 20 having lived IN
Woshinrton-st Boston. between August 1914 anu
NAV 1873. In September, 1874. the fouDgses tGoR
iodSiinos in his house. where they remained a
month or two. When the claimant met the MI
ness short time ago he t not oRly denied a1
ever having lodged in Westinghouse. Inc witness
agreed that the claimant bore great resemblance
to Theophlus YounGs, but thought tnaG hG cou'u
rot be he hecaue lie seemed somewhat 1li''I,
Ahce Yonngs age fourteen. the daugh.
ter Of Thcopius YOungs, was al the a,,n next
witness The claimant came forward ana above? ~
the girl to feel his head. she haray 'oucneu ~
lie cannot be my father for he has not the
scar" ..o,a ron,,noa her in regard 10
tbe meeting she had with the claimant a few months
ago nj n house IN Madison-ave. This meeting had
been prearranged. The witness declared tnat II sue
wept at the time it was because they nao GoI het
ali worked up in room alone" she also salu that
She had not thrown herself spontaneously into nls
arms as asserted but that he had drawn her 10 hln
by force ,tuo, 90
THROWN TO THE GROUND AND SHOT AT.
Officer Twohy took to the Jefferson Market P9lice
Court after its adjournment Tuesday evening" JOnn
Bntler of No. ], 604 Second-ave, whom he had ar
rested on charge of firing shot from q reVoVsl
nj Victor Mack arlane. of No. 1922 West Fourteenth-
ST. Yesterday morning Buffers examination tooS
place before Justice Patterson. Mact arane stateu
that on Tuesday evening" in FOurteenth-st., near
Tenth ave. be met Butler who SAID that ne 1esIeu
10 sneak with him. The latter refused to TAX WIFI
Bntler wnereupon Butler grappled with MIN ana
threw him upon the sidewalk, cutting gash ID
his forehead. MacFarlane struggled to release hlm-
self and when he regalned his feet, Butler drew
revolver and fred at the complainant. The Dall,
however. missed its mark. Butler said in court
that he did not shoot at MacFarlane. ana accused
tho complainant of appropriating money which had
been left the defendants wie as an %;
The prisoner was helu W ans"e1 Ill o''"O-' -
70 900 BAIL