The daily Cairo bulletin. (Cairo, Ill.) 1878-1???, 1881-02-12


VS.. Illinois Central R. r. Co., case, Appear
ance.
No. 1466. Violet j. Easily admir-, &c. vs.
same, case Same.
No. 1467. William ]. Lemp vs.. John
sproat, assumpsit, Same
No. 1868. Hill e. Mitchell VS.. Rosen-
water & Gross, assumpsit. Appearance
No. 1869. Halliday Bros. vs.. George
Hodges, replevn. Appearance.
No. 147O. In matter of application of
Wesley O'Hara, guardian &C., for leave to
sell real estate. Appearance.
No. 1471. Kitty Miller VS.. John Nc
Nulty and John Hogan, trespass. Appear
ance.
No. 1472. John NJ. Tarble VS.. John
Hogan, repevin. Appearance,
No. 1473. Huse, LOOMS & Co. vs.. John
Sproat, assumpsit. Appearance.
No. 1474. Alexander County vs. Hill
Smalling appeal. Appearance.
No. 1475. City of Cairo vs. Cairo &
Vincennes R. r. Co., appeal. Appearance.
No. 1476. Same VS., same. Same.
No. 1477. Same vs.. same. Same.
No. 147S. Same vs.. same. Same.
No. 1910. Same vs.. same. Same.
No. 1850. Same vs. Henry Breihan, APP
peal. Appearance
No. 1881. Same vs.. Samuel Meyers, APP
peal. Appearance.
No. 14s2. Carl Koehler VS.. Ferdinand
Koehler, appeal Appearance.
No. 1888. Geo. Victor for use Of Jeffrey
vs.. Chas. Hammond, appeal Appearance.
No. 1884 Solomon Easter VS.. same ap-
peal. Appearance.
No 1856. John Major ". J, L. Baker
ct al, appeal. Appearance.
No. 1886. Lucretia Coffee, guardian, &c.
vs.. John Bankston, appeal. Appearance.
Nc 1887, B. F. WiIbourn Tor use OF
Bross VS.. C, O. Patier & Co., appeal. APP
pearance.
No. l4SS. John A. Walsh VS.. Patrick
Mahoney, appeal. Appearance.
No. 1889 G. NJ, Alden VS.. Herman
Blooms, appeal. Appearance.
No. 1870. Missouri Glass Co, VS.. w. NJ.
Cundiff, appeal. Appearance.
No. 1491 Geo. Anderson vs. John Nc
Carthy, appeal. Appearance
No. 1892. McMllen & Gilbert VS.. G. o.
Patier & Co., appeal. Appearance.
No. 1893. Rice Silk & Co. VS.. f. Roth,
assumpsit. Appearance
No. 1494. Hill & Mitchell vs.. Z. Roth,
assumpsit. Appearance.
No. 1895. People ex rel, Thos. Clarke
vs.. George E, Olmsted, mandamus, Appear
ance.
CHANCERY DOCKET.
No. 70. Nixon, Ellison & Co. VS.. South.
western Insurance Co., creditors bill. Con-
tinued.
No. 1872 Southwestern Insurance Co.
vs.. Daniel Hurd, bill for relief. Exceptions
to report of John Q, Harman, receiver. Re
signation of receiver accepted and l. L.
Harrell appointed in his stead, order to
Hartman to turn over property and money
in his hands to his successor IN Office.
No 223 Illinois Central Railroad Co.
vs. James S, Miller ct al, injunction. Con
tinued.
No. 2j2. George Hendricks vs. John
Gladney ct al, mechanics lien. Continued.
No. 267 Sarah J. Chisholm VS.. John
d, Chisholm ct al, partition, Continued.
No 300. Patrick Mahoney VS.. Timothy
Mahoney ct al, partition. Continued.
No. 321. Elijah Dickerson VS.. Mary Ice
ct al, foreclosure. Continued.
No. 1922. James Hartman, Jr. Us. Maria
Foster ct al, foreclosure. Continued.
No. 1873. William B, Gilbert VS.. Mary
~ DhilIHS CT as III aosulbuulcul vi NO"VI
and relief, Continued.
No. $40. Trustees of Schools, TIP. II,
S. h. l W., VS.. Lee Phillips ct al, foreclos-
ure. Continued.
No. $40 Edmond X. O'Brlen VS.. Ed
mund B. Garaghty ct al, foreclosure, Con
tinued.
No. $50, Margaret Ladeaur admx &c.
VS., F., D. and W. N. Anterior, bill to ac-
count. Continued.
No. 1853. Frederick Korsmeyer VS..
John Q. Harmon, bill for account. Con
tinued.
No, 81. Jacob Lchning g. Albert
Susanka VS., Augusta Harris g. Peter Nef,
to forccIose lien. Continued.
No. 374 Fredolin Bross admir-. &c. VS..
Sarah J. Gordon ct al, bill to set aside
conveyance. Continued.
No, 37S. Henry Whitcamp VS.. VIM.
Eichoif ct al, foreclosure Continued for