Morning journal and courier., 1881-10-22
,souruaI aao Gourier.
Int11rilaH Morning. Oct. g. 1881.
Maney Trial.
l.,,,,-,,,.,,--,,--, rno,, srcoun p.ap !


 Maney Trial.
 (coNr1NUED FROM SECOND PAGE
 liable as the fact that they saw her. It is probable Jennie went to the store, and that James promised to take her to Savin Rock Friday and settle it. Jennie did not wish to be with Blanche again, as her parents would look for her first at the Elliott House. So she started for Savin Rock to take bath after the previous nights experiences-the same as Blanche did.
 So she started for Savin Rock, perhaps to take bath after the night befores doings, as Blanche had done. We find her going down on the SaYin Rock car and she no doubt took the bath behind the Rock. She returned to the city about 3 o'clock. Repu- table witnesses saw her and Blanche together on the street. They went together to the Elliott House, as Patrick Early of the hotel saw them coming out together. Blanche went to the dressmaker's and Jennie went off alone. About seven that Thursday even ing she met Blanche again. There is strong testimony to that effect MT. Mattoon, Mrs KIippstein, Mrs. Crofut and others saw them together. And, Your Honor, why the alarm on the past of the Malleys at Jennie Cramer's ab- sence? Because they feared Jennie had gone 1 to New York to disclose all to her brother. James and Walter made haste to intercept | her. They don't want the revelation and the
  James found Blanche and intercepts Waiter | at Stamford with the message 70 K, {" Wal | ter comes back at once. Next we ind the three at Redcliffes at supper. Bertha VII | liamson's original statement, and the one be- | lieve, was with reference to the parties she | saw in bed at the Foote house that Friday morning, August ,. cannot help thinking | that Bertha was pressed to change her story ! Remember she is in the employ of a man who | is in the employ of defendants father. Mrs | Neumann's testimony is in degree confirma l tory of Miss Williamson in reference to the l August 4. There is little doubt that Jennie was in that building Thursday night and Fri | day.
 1 Mr. Bollman referred, previously to the | late night testimony, to MT. Mattoon, MT | Hubbell, Mrs. Klippstein and Mrs. Crofut | who saw Jennie and Blanche that Thursday l evening. This made the accounting for Jen nie complete up to late Thursday night. The State think it likely that Walterlooked | for James Friday morning-it was time fol | him to be at the store-and left % by tht window, passed over the adjoining roof, ant | entered the building again with James by thu l hall window, between 22 and 24.
 On Friday James and Walter find that i ! will not do to keep Jennie in the Foot building all the time Marriage with Jaiae is out of the question; and exposure is no | to be thought of. Jennie watches Jame | when he comes from the store and bother 1 him constantly. They take a walk togethe | walked with him afterward. We do no claim that at that time they walked up Whit ney avenue. Jennie saw him again and the | walked up Whitney avenue. James begin to muddle up things in the afternoon-act suspiciously. At twenty minutes past c | whereabouts we find James away from th store in his uncle's carriage. He drives fur ously home and remains there but mome1 without getting out. He talks with woman Two of his sisters have testified that he didn talk with them. But where is Kitty, tE third sister :? She hasn't been callel It is just as probable she was the one l talked with as any of the others. Jam, gets back to the store-his buggy is handy and assists ill closing up. He goes next al sees Walter and Blanche of he probab = wanted to talk up matters. Mir. Bollmf held to Henry c. Aliens testimony as an 1T portant link. Allen saw James Malley wi Jennie Cramer in buggy together that Tue day night. His difidence in his eviden 's | speaks of him as an honest man. Mir. A. l. Sanford sees the same carriage soon aft and bows to James standing near it. Whe was Jennie at this time? In the Foo |, l house
 '- James and Jennie we find together at t h l shore that night All the witnesses testi 1T that Jennie was with young man. Ale
 
 , Jack Gilchrist, all testify positively th s, James was not at home when the defen " say he was. Can ten alibis break thes
 They are all disinterested witnesses; no mi
 ice has been shown. On the other hand z most entirely all the witnesses for the defen
 on the alibi point are relatives or employees
 the father of one of the accused. The (
 fense will claim that Walter Malley al
 Blanche Douglass left the Branford Poi
 Hotel that Friday night at half-past ten. '
 have no witness on this trial to dispute t
 time. We have two reliable witnesses W positively swear that Walter was at the W.
 Haven shore that night It was possible f
 it might have been II o'clock, but Eva
 placed 1t earlier. Both persons we find ne
 the place where the body was found and ne
 the girl. little later we find quarrel ne
 the spot One of the parties may have be
 Jennie. The State on this point simI
 claims the testimony for what it is wort
 The little circumstance about the coachm
 being out late-between 3 and 4-that mol
 ing is important. Then we find that Jan
 Malley denies all knowledge of the girl
 even that she an acquaintance of
 This is very suspicious.
 MT. Bollman referred next to the alterati ! on the Branford Point register and the WI
 ing of J. Cramer's name on it as suggesti
 the work of an interested party. Mir. Be
 man next referred to the opium recipe 8
 next assailed the alibi testimony as all fir, interested parties. Then two little daught and the father were not called to testi
 Again, James, ST., tried to have Conduc Barnes see James at the window that Eric ! night In conclusion Mir. Bollman held tt
 there was probable cause for binding over
 accused.
 Recess till two.
 Afternoon Session. At the opening of the afternoon session MT.