National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1881-03-31
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

On motion of Hon. Montgomery Blair, w E. GIee-
sou esq, of Baltimore, Md, was admitted TO practice.
Wagner, esq, ct Philadelphia, Pa, was admitted to
i' No. ia Charles NJ Blake, appellant VS. United
States. Appeal from The Court Of Claims. Judgment
affirmed Opinion by Nr. Justice Harlan.
Iany ct AL plaintiffs in error Patrick FacOner ct
al. In error to the supreme Court of the State of
NeT York Decree affirmed, with costs Opinion by
Mr.. Justice Bradley.
No I2s The Buffalo and jamestown Railroad Com
UaHy plaintiff iii error, Walter ]. Weeks ct al. In
error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decree affirmed, with costs Opinion by Mr.. Justice
No. S: The Steamship Benefactor &c, appellant,
William II. Mount ct al;
Company, appellants, vs. William IL Mount ct al.
Order entered modifying decree and mandate, and
OIder.-n is ordered that the following rule be,
and the same is hereby adopted addition to the
rules fpractice IN the courts Ofthe United States in
causes Of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction, on the
instance side of the court: Rule S. All the preceding
rules and regulations Tor proceeding in cases where
claim the benefit of limitation of liability provided
for in the act Of Congress in that behalf shall apply
cases or shall be pending in said courts upon APP
peal from the district courts.
No. Z2S The German National Bank of Chicago. ap-
peant VS.. Mark KinibalI collector Be. ct al. Alp
peal from the Circuit Court of the United States for
the Northern District of Illinois. Decree affirmed,
with costs Opinion by Mr.. Justice Miller.
No. 2A schuyler Steamboat Line. &c, appellant,
rs. Madison NJ. Caleb No. 255, William H. FoOte ct
30 Charles Wilson and Arthur Wilson claimants Rp-
peilants, Madison N. Caleb Appeals from the
Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Dis
trict of New York. Decree affirmed each appellant
court Opinion by Mr. CiiefJgstice Waite. '' III 'HiS
No. GKi William H Folsom, appellant, VS.. Ann L.
Dewey ct al; Appeal from the Supreme Court OF the
Territory of Utah. Judgment reversed. with costs
and cause remanded. with Instructions to enter or
cause to be entered Judgment in favor of the appel
liant, William II. Folsom, for the premises claimed
by him. Opinion 10y Mr.. ChefJustice Waite.
A * 30 iGs MeSa MeReer pS M6fae S Nc
KirchneT; IT, Appeals from the Circuit Court of the
United States for the District of Iowa. Decree af-
tirmed, with costs Opinion by Mr.. ChiefJustice
No. 22s The Newport and Cincinnati Bridge Com
paIy, appellant, vs.. The United States. Ordered for
) rearguneut before q full bench.
No $50. The United States plaintiff in error vs. The
Erie Railway Company. Ordered for reargument be-
No 81 The Board of School Directors of the Parish
DEE: No 52l The Board of School Directors for the
Parish of ConcOrdia niaintilfn error, Joseph Her
nandez. Motions TO dismiss denied.
EX parte The Detroit River Ferry Company. petit
iioner. Petton ior writ OF prohibition. Rule TO
snow cause why writ should not issue granted return
able on the second day of the next term.
No 10l5. JustIs 1. McC'arty. appellant VS. Orleans
victory McCarty Petition to allow counsel fee sub
support of same and by AIr. w. D. Dayidge in oppOs
No. 81. Frank f Yates ct AL plaintiffs in error vs.
samuel b. jerks assignee, DC On motion of Mr.. w.
~ Mckenney, dismissed with costs, per stipulation.
No 49,. Edward ]. Gay ct al., appellants, Albert
{: Allen. tutor, &C. ct al. On motion of Mr.. w. A
ACk enney, dismissed with costs per stipulation.
NO OBI Jus Bl9clOH, appellant, VS.. George ~
ArIneS- Motion to dismiss submitted by Mr.. c. H.
Armes IA support of same and by Mr.. s. S. Henkle i'll
opposition thereto.
No. ZIG. The Richmond Mining Company, appel
liant, IS. The Eureka Consolidated Mining COMPANY;
No. liz. The Richmond Mining Company. appel
liant VI. The Eureka Consolidated Mining Company:
No. lis, The Richmond Mining Company plaintiff
IN error. The Eureka Consolidated Mining Com
pany. Argument concluded by Mr.. Thomas Wren
soT appellants and plaintiff in error.
No. ~ The Town of Thompson, plaintiff in error
vs. Orlando PerrinS. Argument commenced by Mr..
L r Bush for plaintiff ia error.
Adjourned mill To-day AT twelve