, 1881-12-29
THE COURTS.
Arguments on the Motion of
PrInco hlbert Jones for
a New Trial.
.utfrc Rogers Takes the Matter
Under AdvIscincnt for
n Week.
New Suits, Confessions, Judg-
ments, Etc.

The arEl1mchts Oil Tho niliO.i for n now trfnl
lntlbc extremely -prUlu1tRetl clsr OF Prince AL
l.,rt u1es who WIS convicted or numbering his
Irotl,ur .lntnes and sentenced for. life, wcro
hrprl lHrore JnlRa ltpKcrA yestcrslay murning.
Jubrt Lyle King, III Jpnning In support Ut tho
mu.Jo, std tito caac hl l,eel, moro vigorously
nr,srrutc III tho newspapers thtn lit Tho court.
Tnr crticIsns wcr,, vIMl'etiye. md made BY
e1,tors entirely ,Rnurnnt Ut tho "details. this
fart had Invested tho cuso with Il fnIsn md n,I-
ycpitl0ta ntrrcst, ami mntlr It ,lldl!cu1t for NIL
tnnncstel With II 10 act w!,h tho o,ltro cuh-
Yn.nrc md '!npart!nlaty thnt wonld y. expected
"s was Nr. Kings iirm. conviction lint
H. slst w. ''r"fsy wR <. aH ,, Intst
isrt Ut trot,, having IN npurtmI trnl. THO prcJi-
.nul,,lmiiy; s mud. Judging trunl thu MppcnraIco
ii tho Jury he hM.I III doubt TINT tay hud 1t,M,lo
IN ,lleir minds bnfore tho tlcfcnsp put IN any
itsntbtiy. Nr+ King ituyDr knew 1t a moro
t,lutIc v1rt1ct. The jury hunt tono Tho ID
ieadnrs jnstee. becauso they wcrs Incapable Of
Ihr hrs! ap"eifo error advanced ,by counsel
was Tho ',lu 'ssi'n OF tho dying dcc!nrntons Of
The ,ceeas;l whn ~ss , ,"'treyereut," and. nc.
VI hc snfmittci M aili,Avit.nf Olive Fronch.
xhn swnre thnt rho WAS me Of ttast, With James
the night he tiad, mid ah1 llltn't hcar him suy
Whit liz brutllor lnendorH testified lie dill. lii
auulhcr affidavit Frlncu Albert stHtett that h0
yt S W. Frsnc was M lresct IN to @ rom, S1 'a aid ths @
ehe would cori',1orntc hts sistor l5rAtr!ce, whp
had contrnaI<te'' tho evidences "f Theodore, his
While this sns cumulative. Sir. King contcntl-
cd tint tho evidence wns nf auch Importance
that thn ncc'iscd SHOULD have a opportunity ~
drnppcd out OF thu prosecution.
Tho verdict. to- tn WY %ns ,9t oMly unsupported by
sIer e prrpol:rco @ II eyemso II fyr ~ ,So or S liz
delcn,lhnt. WIN WIN justlllcl fiji shouting on tho
gEo,ttd IF seir-tlcfnnsc.
Xina urged that tho plea Of mt guilty ,wns
entered 'nctoru Judge Williamson, VINO hid III,
!atsaIs591 d Ms i WIS tGken after tho cnzo Of
Assistant :states'- Attorney Thomson, In re:
p!y. end that Mr. King ht'nself, during the trial
frniaut had had tho tull righta Of II
Ehte ,.,!'n naHwtTo shanEes Of verne two
something which Ind never tccn granted to n
She mn, ~, II @ Cool Co.lnsy. Thers was nothing
tlaimcd that nothing new bud boon ndynnceil by
Mr.. kinR as to tho insnlifo!ency OF tho tostl.
the tiMo Ut tho argument uf tho previous MO
lions for Il now sriAl. which hau hoe., refused.
As TO A tho ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS evidence, tho ~
tcco,d trial, but bad not called her. besides,
her testimony, was not cumulative. It wus mt
Seon nsti sid IT 4on s h"vo heard Tho lf sefs %
James % bitG thrco 6ui- iioles in hiaSauk. ' '''S
,u,pc Williamson. tut bctoro tho Criinil,ul Court
ofCook County. No application for ehangD Of
!cnuc could reach Tho fora,ns, of issue, The
guilty IN tho Criminal Court. un no right Of bis
preI,lh!cGl;, tIc bad het,l found gully BY two
IT, 1hoinpson sI oonte",ie, ] % tis tho % n TIL o''o
sho,llh not 'he intcsfercA with unless clearly