Sacramento daily record-union., 1881-11-17
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.
IN BANK.


| WEDNESDAY, November 10, 1881.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
morrison, g. j., presiding McKinstry, j.; Thorn
ton, j.; Myrick, j.; Sharpstein, j.; Ross. j.; c. N
Post, Deputy Clerk; Perrie Kewen, Bailiff.
Mr.. Justice Thornton proceeded to further examine
the class OF applicants for admission to practice in
| reference to their proficiency and learning in the
law Upon sufficient examination the question Of
their admission was taken under advisement.
| 7956-People vs.. Spencer-0rdered that this cause
| be referred to the Hon. j. B. Hendricks, Superior
Judge of Lassen county, to take depositions, and
that he be and is hereby authorized to take such
dispositions herein, and report all proceedings by
him done to the Court in bank at its noxt January
session at San Francisco
Adjourned for the session.
Ordered that the following applicants for admis-
sion to practice heretofore examined in open Court
as TO their learning and proficiency in the law, be
and they are hereby admitted 10 practice as attor-
neys and at law in all the Courts OF this
State, viz, Milton S. Eisner and j. E. Prewett.
S077-C Carpenter vs. Bartlett-Appcal dismissed
by the Court.
DEPARTMENT ONE
WEDNESDAY, November 10, 1881.
The Court met for the November session. Pres
ent-Mckinstry, j., presiding Myrick. j.; Ross,
j.; Martin, Deputy Clerk Finkler, Bailiff.
S05s-Gray vs. Moore, Judge of Amador county
Demurrer to petition argued by Armstrong for
respondent and Holl for petitioner, and demurrer
sustained with leave to petitioner TO amend within
ten days.
7739-Browne vs. Burbank ct ux-Argued by
Armstrong for appellant and Taylor for respondent.
and submitted.
7746-In re Bixler vs. Board OF Supervisors Sac
ramento County-Argued by Gordon and Bixler for
appellant and Mchune for respondent, and SUBJ
mitted.
7747-In re Bixler vs. Parvin ct al-Argued by
Gordon and Bixer for plaintiff and McKune for
defendant, and submitted.
7S02-Cbandler VS.. Peoples Savings Bank ct al
Argued by Beatty for appellant and Ackenna for
respondent, and submitted.
Court adjourned until 10 A. NJ. tomorrow.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
The Court met at 10 o'clock A. NJ Present
Morrison, c. j., presiding Thornton, j.; Sharp
Bailiff.
1O,6s7-People vs.. All Lee ct al Continued for
the session.
10,6S9-People VS.. McLane-Same order as above
lo,695-People vs. de Los Angeles-Same order as
above.
lO,697-People vs. Kalloch ct al-Ordered that
the parties hereto have fifteen days in which to file
briefs. Cause TO be thereupon submitted.
10,69S-People VS.. Kalloch-Same ORDER as above.
l0.699-People VS.. Kalloch-Same order as above.
]0,700-People VS.. Kalloch-Same order as above.
10,701-People VS.. Kalloch-Same order above.
10,645-People vs. Smith-Argued by Walling for
appellant and Deputy Attorney General White and
Cross for the People, and submitted.
10,656-People vs.. TaYlor-Argued by Ball for ap-
pellant ana Deputy Attorney General White for the
People, and submitted.
10,665-People VS.. Castro Argued by Deputy
Attorney-Genera! White for respondent, and SUBJ
mtted
1865 People vs. Morine-Argued by Bridgeford
for appellant and Starr for respondent, and SUBJ
mtted
10,672-People ys. Titherington-Argued by Kee-
ley for appellant and Deputy Attorney-General
White for respondent, and submitted.
10,673-People vs. Hong All Duck-Passed.
10,675-PeOple vs. Hennessey-Argued by Deputy
Attoruey-General White Tor respondent, and SUBJ
mitted.
lO.6Sl-People vs. Dailev-notion to strike out
bill of exceptions herein. Argued by Deputy Attor-
uey General White for the People and Daggett for
appellant. Cause argued by Dsggett for appellant
ard Deputy Attorney General White for the People,
and submitted.
Adjourned until $50 A. NJ. tomorrow.
To-DAY's CALENDAR.
DEPARTMENT ONE.
7So7-Miler vs.. Chandler.
7SI5-Strong vs.. Sacramento and P r. H. Co.
7S42-Pierce VS.. Schadeu.
7S51-Washburn VS.. Wilkinson.
DEPARTMENT TWO.
10,6s4-People w. Devne.
1o6S5-People VS.. Hebing.
10,6S6-People vs. Williams.
10,692-People VS.. Messersnith.
10,G94-People VS.. Simonds
SUPERIOR COURT.
WEDNESDAY, November 16, 1881.
TEMPLE, Judge.
The People vs. The Gold Run Ditch and Mining
Communicating of testimony for the People.
Count adjourned at until $50 A. NJ. to-
morrow.
To-DAY's CALENDAR
THE Peonle vs. The Gold Run Ditch and Mining