Arizona weekly citizen., 1881-01-22
The court reconvened Wednesday at

The court reconvened Wednesday at 80 o'clock P. m., when the examin- ation of MT. Kremp was resumed by the prosecution.
 Q.-You stated that you acas ted one of the clerks of election at Tres Alamus, 1 believer
 A.-Yes, SIT
 Q.-I understand you to say that this paper handing witness pnperl is a duplicate of the tally list oi the election held 1t Tres AIamos?
 A-Yes, sir; il is one of the lists kept.
 Cross-examination by the defense: Q.-Wheu was the duplicate copy made?
 A.-At the same tune the other was made.
 Q.-Who had charge of this copy?
 A.-Mr. Dunbar.
 Mr. Gibson was then sworn, and ex. amined by the prosecution.
 Q.-Where were you on the cleo ton at Tres Alamos.
 Al WAS at Tres Alamcs.
 Q.-In what capacity did you act on that day?
 Al acted as one of the clerks of the election; MT. Dunbar acted as in- spector.
 The attorney for the prosecution here h. nded a paper to witness and asked him what it was.
 Alt Is a tally list of the late cleo ton at Tres Alamos, which he made out himself; boIh lists were made out at the same time.
 Q.-What became of the Others
 Alt was given tp Mr. Dunbar, who was the postmaster, tn be by him sent to 5. w. Carpenter, County Re cOrder; the euvelop had two postage stamps on IL, and on one corner was written election papers"
 Cross examined by the defense: c. By whom were you appointed clerk of electiOny
 A. By MT Dunbar.
 Q.-What became of the ballots that were cast?
 A-They were given to MT. Oun- bar; don't know what became oi them.
 The prosecution again offered the lally ] st in evidence. Objected io. The court Overuied objection. The tally list was then filed in evidence. Examination of witness resumed.
 Q-Have you the ballots cast at the last election st Tres AlamOs?
 Al have them.
 Q.-From whom did you receive them?
 Al received them from Thos. Dunbar.
 Q-State whether these were the ballOts cast al the late election?
 A.-ihey are the same handed me by tue Inspector, MT. Dunbar; l can- uO; siaIe positively now that they are the same.
 The witness was here requested to examine the ballots. Counted them, aud stated that he found the right number, which agreed with the tally list. He al; 0 stated that he found the ballot he cast. The Court asked the witness if he was decided.
 Ale thought that he was; found a ballot on which he had written; did not tLink he wrote on any other.
 The witness was then asked 10 pre- pare the ballots with the Ially-list to ascertain whether they CorrcspOnded with the votes cast for MT. Paul and Mr. Shibell, as kept on the tally-list on the day of election; on eXsmina- lion they were found to correspond
 CrOSs-t examined by the defense: Q.-Do you think the ballots before you are the same cast ou the day Uf election?
 Al think they are.
 Q-From whom did you obtain them?
 A.-From the Inspector-Mr. Dun bar.
 Q.-Then you will not swear posi- lively that those are Ihe same bsllOIsg
 A.-Nn; because they have noI been in my possession all Ihe time.
 MT. Paul was then recalled, but nothing material was addUced further than that he believed that the ballots were the same that MT. Dunbar ex- hibited to him during the latter part of December. The Court decided to exclude the ballots for the present. but owing To the fact that Nr Dunbar's evidence could not be obtained, he would d. low the prosecution 10 introd uce tur- ther testimony on thls question, il they desired 10 do so. Attorney for the defense had Mr. Kelly sworn. Q.-Whers do you reside, Mr. Keliyi