Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1881-09-28

The September term of the distric
court opened at 10 O'Clock yesterda.
morning, Judge Brill presiding. Their
were fpresent the officers of the court
Sheriff Richter, County Attorney Egar
and an unusually large number of law
yers.
THE GRAND JURY.
The court inquired if the members q
the grand jury were present, when thu
sheriff reported the following members Of
that body as present in court:
Howard Potts, R. o. Sweeney,
G. A. Vandersluis, Albert Wolff,
W. H. Temple, Geo. Palms,
E. II. Bailey, Chas: Hoffman,
Philip Riley, G. w: Hackett.
E. N. Bacon, j. +. IOsteVln,
E. N. Saunders, K. ID. Judson,
j. D. Ludden, y. q. Macklett,
Samuel Potter, Chas. McIllrath,
Henry Schumacher, w. &. West,
James King.
W. C.. West was excused from serving,
that gentleman being over age.
The court then stated that the trial OF
criminal cases would be taken up on o.
tober II, at 10 a. m.
The grand jury was excused until 10
O'Clock this morning.
After disposing of several cases in
which continuances were granted, on mo
ton of counsel, judgment was ordered in
a number of delinquent tax cases in
which H. W. Rice, county treasurer, is
the plaintiff.
At 2 O'Clock the court took up the
calendar and the afternoon was consumed
in settling and otherwise disposing OF
cases. The civil calendar is unusually
large, there being 1913 cases. The crimi-
nal calendar is also larger than usual,
containing 50 cases.
JURY CASES.
Yesterday jury cases were set for trial
as follows:
City of St. Paul VS.. Louis Engles; No
vember IL.
E. W. Denton VS.. 81. A. Castle; No
vember IL.
G. II. Stiles VS.. O. P. Greenman; o.
tober IL.
Rosa J. Gribble VS.. A. H. Lohlker ct
al; November 4.
Allie Hewitt VS.. st. Paul, Minneapolis
s. Manitoba railroad company; Octo-
Der "a.
J. Sheldon, B. F. Sherman, Fl. t.
Coffee and D. j. Hennessy VS.. Same;
anne.
E. D. Davis g. Co. vs. Michaud Bros;
October 8.
Tusler, Goucher s. De Long VS.. Leigh
ton s. Jordan; October %.
j. K Humphrey VS.. w. r. Merriam;
struck jury October IL.
T. E. Parker VS.. p Loeffel; October 8.
Pearce g. Jones VS.. Berge, Williams &,
Co.; October 13.
W. r. Burt VS.. Sherwood & Suther-
land; October II.
L. J. Webb vs. Chicago, Milwaukee
s. St. Paul Railroad company; October 26.
]. N Pottgeiser VS.. Cily of St. Panl;
November %.
Anne Bowlin VS.. Marshall Sherman;
October 26.
Same VS.. Same; October 26.
s. P. Walbank vs. St. Paul & Duluth
Railroad company; November s.
Cleveland Cooperative Stove Com.
pany VS. j. j. Squires; October 4.
M. Brown VS.. Frank s. Kuenz; trial o.
tober A.
Same VS.. Patrick Shea; same.
Henry O'Gorman, judge of probate, VS.
W. F. Davidson; October q.
Hugh Mckinley VS.. st. Paul & Duluth
Railroad company; November 5.
G. Pavlaw VS.. City st. Paul; Novem-
Der %.
VIM. J. Dyer VS.. VIM. A. Judd; Octo-
Der IA.
John Peters VS.. Haycock 6 90. ct al
October 5.
P. O'Regan vs.. A. Schoch; October 81
s. L. Pierce VS.. John Wagner; Octo-
Der 6.
VIM. Messenger VS.. Stees Bros; No
vember 3.
H. ]. Burton vs.. McIntire & Wood
ward; October 3.
Geo. Chandler, receiver, VS.. T. D. Ha-
ger; October 3.
E. Smith & Co. vs.. ]. G. Magin, ct al;
October Is.
E. Wright vs.. E. Larpentur; October
10.
U. L. Lamprey VS.. City st. Paul; No.
vember l.
M. O'Connell, administrator, vs.. St.
Paul & Manitoba Railroad company; No
vember 8.
W. F. Davidson vs. j. N. Hilland; No
vember 2.
B. M. Goldschmidt vs. Home Insurance
company, OF New York, November IA.
G. A. Reynolds VS.. ]. B. Brisbin: O.
tober 5.
]. Robert VS.. G.. P. Mervin; October g.
Peter Lontie VS.. W. L. Mintzer, Octo-
her 10.
Jacob Haraf ct al. VS.. Chicago, St. Paul
6 Omaha Railrod company; November l.
Mary Jorgenson VS. City st. Paul; No
vember l.
T. F. Patterson VS.. Northern Pacific
Railroad company; October IL.
Mary Dunbar VS.. Pulford & Mann; Oc-
tober IA.
j. Harris VS.. St. Louis & st. Paul
Packet company. November 9.
Chas. Bernhard VS.. ]. &. Magin; Octo-
Der Is
w. D. Richardson VS.. T. NJ. Metcalf;
October IL.
q 8 Moore vs M e. Froa1ioh. Ooto