, 1881-01-11

scntel on pnper, whether In cartton or nnr-
trnEt, t|lUlip1l lin Ind lievcr seen the orig
nal; for certaf,. prc'llinr expression Is
Enthusiastically Irtrays Tic nationality, Of the
lnnI,, and II Il sati lllnt Mr. Reilly cilltlvatcs
this peculiarly Of cnnntciIauce. His n,nt,-
ner was very ensy. nliet, ntd cordial; llIs
lagll wits frequent and Hcnfty, and his voice
""%Wcrc % 70 yo'l IL cycr ever In Chicago beforc?'
H,ietrietl tho scribe after tho ns't"l conErata'
II Was here III '7u." answered The gentle.
n,n,. "un NY why IL tic st. 1.n,lis Cnnyeil-
itotl. alltl mule short visit hero In ~. but
was never In the city long enough t9 1enrt,
.,.e, nv! about chtcag" fron my own ohssrva-
II suppose. Mr.. Kelly, that tho readers OF
THE Illint:SE wi'l Gxncct 70 sec soIlls ol'i',.
ions of yours on politics Il III. Interview Is
hl*is l. aEai;st yGinI, s,1st",, !" mSq
Not Mt ail," was the smiling RESPONSE;
-! lave never llrslsntct ~ wflat II t llnii.
pr,;ty wpl! kiluwn wI,nt NY views are:"
,"Wcll, would you ,nln.i ts'IIng a9nI'1 why
he pe"i: est }s's;y tS keep GEN. liasS on
"'rho simplest wuy to answer that question
IL IL say that It was beca'lse tbs penpln lil
let well enough afutle."
- Dttl WIS tIEEE Ill lI!NIE INhENlul !Enaoh
why the DGnltErAcy Suffered It's ucleatf'
Ti1DEN THE CAUSE.
"Tt might llnys. been nyuitletl It Mr.. Tlldcn
had iiot nctrd scfilSlly In tic matter, and ln
only tic SUCCESS Ut ills PARTY nt heart. lle
;hcjl s III cs; s' # @ MeE II fGGy GGoynys,iS xris ta IT
! they ntlowel1 New York State 10 be wo', by
| the Republicans. New. York f. Dc11n'cratlc
l,y 10000 majorty, nnA II Ti!tlcn and his
iticy co.itrol|c'i ii ';';. a'rd might have con
troije.i during tic !nta cntnpn'gn, tie result
| would haze been different"
| At this ],l1ictnru Il earl was brought III to
Atr. Kelly, al,d ~ RESPONSE to lii4 Invitation,
Ar. Eu!ery 4. 5tnrrs md olle Or two otler
gentlemen wcr'. shawn into =, tie fnti, = mo
n,ent nr two later. Mr.. Kelly s!snok llntlds
with them all. nt'd tho conversation occa1lle
Mr. Siorrs had evidently heard the close Of
Mr. Kely's last observation about New fnrk,
for he somewhat abruptly sail: ~ itifIk Il
ssx was the Ssw ysoga' ot assistance OF firt that
i ri was lHst sayi',;; that it was Mr. rilden's
"Vt course" c",!tluued the prospective
i;Isa! ii;as'!y,l!'y I! and Iii part the work Of ''e"'
Str. Kelly-"And tire Indiana election l.a'l
MI uhtnyura!'lr r'fect on tlc HtErr9t Hlcc tl9n
| fur our sttle. !. as the others did, Thought
Mr Stars" well, iii till ynt,; the n,an-
| ufuctnrtng interests nnt lN'np" generally
weru ton well satisfied Mlt, tf1r condition nf
walked the other; tl.ey. G1ertioIlc,er,Ht fur
count .-,.- :.
Iii some way the Morcy-leltcr tonic was n
trntIuccd,. md tlle. scrlim asked Alr. Kelly
what l.c thought Of The letter anyway.
"llMy arc, stil! trying 70 iMl ont WHO
n"i5n w!@; }i1,! i ysHss; j; own op'lo" Regarding
vi Think il was.,' 3, ,, - 81,
sir. Storrs-". Always dl.f, didn't YOU !"
Mr. kely0"h yn k,,'w IL wHt.aM i1,oI, not
sfsd s dafis SflS iat %d hl'st wre ta ill., ss
mud particularly 10 an unimportant persotl-
ngr." m
Neporter-"W',o wrote f,,l fne letter." .s elo, nv
Mr. Kcl!y-"l .lnn't think l's!ilp wrote tlle
inent l for snsail pa,nr; aid ii!e general iM.
Grssisn, II Ssw lor ; How tt y tnt i s e d ,a
in private. liz catp to my otlicu mic .lay;
said to lin. Now tell me the trntl' alM1t IT.
Mi M a;sMsfe: sis yS VIZ Ks @ eo t i ,ny j"sr @ Mr
Kelly, did rot,-I don't know who wrote
Mr.. storrs-" was Ind management on q,
letter to Ect tho impetus 1t di.l. Tho iden OF
their allowing
TWO, DAYS TO INTERVENE
etMSc ss III III { 1'fots e sy Gt n ts @ sSf, p,e e W
&C Ma'itIcrized III to state tl,at tic letter is
The Question rs to . whom . Gfn; +, x Garfield ct
Storrs' iinnle ",, u published sIa,e. and t'le
. reporter asked Mr.. Slorls wat Ills prospects
, were. ,.,o,,, +. .,,,,
+ | Rms Il, rnnrcuIf -