Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1881-03-15

My whole organism was conferred IN a desire
I to protect myself by shooting him.
Q.-What is the first thing that you re-
member? A.-Rushing along the street.
Q.-Were you very much excited and agi-
tated Al don't think could tell whether
[ was or not.
Q.-Why not? Al don't recollect
Q.-Were you agitated when you got to the
Police office?
Mr.. Highton-1 object.
The Court-Itrelates to the affair. He may
go on.
Mr.. Campbell one knows that, and
any one knows the object of the interruption.
WitDess-I presume was.
WHO WENT TO SEE HIM.
Odd many persons come to see you
Ayes; good many. There were a good
many reporters.
Odd you make any statement to them
Al don't think did
Anybody else come to see you?
Mr.. Highton-I object. This IS inmate
rial.
The Court-It bears upon his frame of
mind.
Mr.. Highton Well, don't propose to be
rushed through-by counsel.
Counsel for prosecution-Nobody is rush
Mr.. Highton-We will reserve our excep-
ton.
The Witness-Well. 1 think there was
Judge Pendrick, of Virginia City, and Nor
ris Grossman.
Q.-How long after the shooting did Nor
ris Grossman call upon you? Al don't
know.
Q.-What hour was it when you got to the
Chronicle office? A.-That don't know.
Q-Was there anything said between Mr..
De Young and you? A.-There was no time
to say anything.
Q.-What was Mr.. De Young doing? A.
I don't know.
O-Wasn't he talking to Mr.. Reed A.
| I have read so since.
! Q-Have you ever in your life spoken to
| Charles De Young, or he to you! A.-No,
! sir.
O.-You never had any personal acquaint-
ance; never had been introduced, or never
had exchanged any mark of recognition? a.
No, sir.
Odd you see anything in the Chronicle
at any time from the time of the shooting OF
your father that indicated on the part Of
/ Charles De Young any intention to do per
sonal violence to you or to your family? A.
4 never have said that on this examination.
l think they were threatening.
| Q.-Now, sir, can you point to single line
in the Chronicle that tends to create an i'm.
preston in the mind of any one that youl
father or any member of his family was to
be attacked? will ask you to produce here
on Monday any articles Of that kind.
Mr.. Highton-We have list of them we
will furnish them.
Mr. Campbell-That's all right.
| Q.-You say you withdrew your ap.
plicatien for Chaplain in the Army about the
| first of January Were you not at that time
| appointed Chief Clerk to your father at a
salary of $3.50 MONTH Al think l was
appointed Clerk in December.
| Q.-When did you make your application
for Chaplain? About two months be-
fore.
ON November? A.-Possibly.
Q-Were you then assistant pastor at the
Metropolitan Temple Al think was.
WHEN HE WITHDREW HIS APPLICATION.
| Q.-You say you withdrew your applica.
ton Have you anything to show when you
withdrew your application? Al have the
letter from the Hon. H. f. Page. my applica.
ton returned to me by the Secretary Of War,
and letter from the Secretary of War.
| Q.-Do you know whether it was as early
as the first part of January: Al have
said twice that don't know exactly, and
don't know, now, even about that. L think
it was after that.
Odd you not, after the time of the
shooting by Charles De Young of your
father, know that your father had, at various
times in public addresses, repeatedly made
attacks upon MIR. De Young, and that these
attacks were not even answered through the
| Chroniclea
MIR. Highton objected. claiming that hav.
| ing thrown out the challenge asking defend
ant to point out certain expressions, the
prosecution must wait until that time arrives
MIR. Campbell stated that the prosecution
proposed to show that Mr.. Kalloch ha6
abused the Chronicle in many places from
the rostrum, from the pulpit, before the
Board of Supervisors, before the Board Of
Health, and in short everywhere; and in
stead of his being afraid OF the Chronicle the
Chronicle had reason to fear him.
Mr. Highton stated that they expected tt
finish their case by the noon recess on Mon
day.
The Court before adjourning stated tina
jurors had complained to him of the necessi
ties of their families. He was sorry that h
could order them no pay, as the law had LET
him no alternative, however much of hard
ship it might be TO the gentlemen composin!
the jury.
Mr. Smoot asked if it would be within th,
law to accept contributions.
The Court said that it was, and that the,
1 might be received.
The Court here adjourned to 10 A. NJ. Mon
day