Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1881-04-06

May 10.
Minnie B. Weld, respondent, VS.. Luther r.
Weld, appellant April 81.
William Clark, appellant, VS. The Chicago,
Milwaukee u ST. Paul railway company and
the Southern Minnesota railway company, re-
spondents. May 90
Roscoe F. Hersey, Dudley H. Hersey, Jacob
Bean, Charles Bean, Edward s. Brown, part
ners rs Hersey Bean q Brown, appellants, vs.
William r. Bennett, A. E. Grlsse,l, late part
ners as Bennett q Grissell, and Lille L. Ben
nett, respondents. April 81.
James G. Freeman, respondent, VS.. Charles
Getchell & Co. ct al, appellants. April 49,
Chauncy Beal and Catherine Beal, respond
ents, VS.. George III. White, appellant. April 20.
The Board of County Commissioners of
Ramsey county, appellant, VS.. William NJ.
Stees, respondent. May %.
The State of Wisconsin, respondent, vs..
Louis E. Torlnus, l. Edwin Staples, William
ii. Bronson and Martin Mower, appellants.
Mayo.
John c. Mcclure, appellant, VS.. The City of
Red Wing, respondent. April Is.
La Grange Mil company, RESPONDENT, vs.
John G. Bennew.tz, appellant. April lo
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. Her
man Baumhager, appellant. Defendant to be
called. April IS.
Mary A. Clark, administrative of the estate
of James s. Clark, deceased, respondent, VS..
The st Paul & Sioux CITY Railroad company,
appellant May IL.
Verrazano Simpson, respondent, VS.. G. II.
Krumdick, appellant. May 10.
johanna Hassfeld, respondent, VS. William
H. Dill and E. V. Bogart, appellant. May 49,.
John w. Pence ct. al, respondents, VS..
The st Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Rail
way company, appellant. May "a.
The State of Minnesota, plaintiff, VS.. Charles
! Waholz, defendant. May H.
| (hrisf ArIrr LIANT VIC 10 r.
visors of the town of Oakdale, respondents.
| April IL.
Maurice Auerbach, George R. Finch,
| William Culbeltson and William II. Van Slyck,
| respondents, VS. The LIE Sueur Mill company,
| appellant. April 30.
Sumner A. Sheffield, appellant, VS.. John
Muln, administrator of the estate of Charles
Brandt, Robert c. Brandt, Gesnie Maria Brandt
and Joseph Herman Brandt, respondents.
| April 20.
| James Acheson and Isabella J. Acheson
| appellants, VS.. Roscoe G. Chace, respondent
Mays.
Anthony Z. Kimmel, respondent, VS.. Joseph
Lowe, appellant. May 4.
| Emma Flynn, respondent, vs.. Helen NJ Mes
sengpr, appellant. May "a.
John Pamper n, respondent, VS.. Michce
Seaman, appellant. May 49,
John Glaspie, respondent, VS.. William f
Glas -ow, appellant. May 4.
E. Ray Fepno, appellant, VS.. r. Il. Chaplin,
respondent. April %.
In the matter of the estate of Harvey Wilson
deceased. In relation 10 an appeal from al
order of said court made on the 18th day Of
July, A. D., 1879, disallowing certain items
| in the administrators account. Halsey VIII
son, Hiram Wilson, Henry Wilson, appellants
April II.
Isaac Marks, appellant, VS.. James Fl. Baker
and j. Lutr Christie, respondents. May II.
George R. Newell, appellant, VS.. Adolphu
Dart, William F. Lewis, Henry Shaubet
| Charles B. Frainr and Lafayette s. Dart, i'm
pleaded with Daniel Buck, respondents
May 13
Lettie F. Furman, respondent, VS. Cornelius
T. Furman, Cornelius w. Furman, and Henr.
Tenne Y, (Henry TeEney), appellants. May 5
Stephen Warner, appellant, VS.. NJ. L. Lock
erby, respondent May 5.
Samuel HolIngsworth and wife, appellants
VS.. E. A. Campbell and L. c. SpOoner, ct al
respondents. Apru 25
Samuel Hol'ngsworth and wife, appellants
vs. f. A. Campbell and L. c. Spooner, ct al
respondents April 25.
Louis Hospes, appellant, VS.. Angler Ames
Charles Holcomb, sheriff of Washington
county, Zebuon H. joss, Irene r. Joss an,
Edwin P. Sanborn, respondents. April II.
Maurice Auerbach, George r. Finch, VIII
liam A. Culbertson and William H. Val
Slycl, appellants, VS.. E. M. Hitchcock, respon
dent May Is.
Daniel P. Noyes, Jr., Charles P. Noyes ant
Edward H. Cutler, appellants, VS.. E. NJ Hitch
cock. May 16.
Charles Holm, John G. Whelan, Frank Fl
Eukhause, appellants, VS.. The Board o
County Commissioners of Sibley county, III
Borough of Henderson, Frank Burnard ct al.
respondents. May %.
John c. Whean, Charles Holm and Franz
H. Eukhause, appellants, VS.. The Board o
County Commissioners of the County of Sib
ley, the Borough of Henderson, John Gerkln
Treasurer of the County of Sibley, ct al, re
spondents. May %.
Anthony L. Kimmel, respondent, vs.. Josepl
Lowe, appellant. May4.
State of Minnesota eX rel. Warren Smith
respondent, VS.. Edgar Cronllhite, appellant
April rs.
| Blue Earth county, respondents, VS.. The st
Paul & Sioux City Railroad company, appel
liant. May IL.
| Isabelle Gates, Administrative of the estat
of A: G. Gates, respondent, VS.. The South
ern Minnesota Railway company, appellant
May 90.
Andrew Schroeder, respondent VS.. Charles
| A. De Graft and VIM. Crooks, appellants
May 6.
State of Minnesota, respondent VS.. Edward
Lawlor, appellant. May 81.
State of Minnesota ex rel. Thompson VS.. o
P. Whitcomb. April IA.
The court thereupon adjourned to $50 this
morning. The sessions hereafter will be hell
| in the northwest corner room of the first foo
of the Market house, occupied by the judge
as an Office, the acoustic properties of thu
large hall not conducting to the dispatch o