davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

The People of the State OF California,
plaintiff, VS. Eugene M. Casey, defend.
ant.
Action brought In the Superior Court
Of the state Of California, in and for the
county Of Los Angeles, and the COM
plant filed In said county of Los Ange.
les, in the office Of the Clerk of said Su-
perior Court.
The People of the State of California
Unknown owner tS and holder Of S Certificate ate
of purchase No. 6442, of the following de-
seribed state land: Location No. 1927, N
u Sec 10, T 8 N, r Is w, s B NJ, contain
ing $40 scr,e,s, situated ie. IN Los Angeles
You are hereby required to appear in
an action brought against you by the
above named plaintiff in the Superior
Court Of the State of California, in and
swer the complaint filed therein. within
ten days exclusive ofthe day Of service)
after the service on you of this summons
If served within this county; or, II
served elsewhere, within thirty days-or
against you according to the prayer Of
said complaint.
The said action is brought to obtain q
decree OF this Court for the foreclosure OF
q certain certificate of purchase No. 6442
ecuted by the said plaintiff to the said
defendant on the 18th day of December,
A ID 1875, fOreolosing all ofdefendant's in.
terest In and TO the following described
land, to wit: N " Sec l6, T 8 N, r Is w,
8 b NJ, containing 800 acres, situated In
Los Angeles county, State of California;;
to cancel and annul the said certificate
Of purchase that plaintiff may have
Judgment and execution against said de.
fendant for the costs of suit, including
$40 compensation of the District Attor-
ney and 81 7O-lO0 costs of publication, AMI
for such other and further relief as
seems meet and agreeable to equity; and
also that the defendant, and all persons
claiming by, through or under him, may
be barred and foreclOsed of all right, IT,
tie, claim, lien, equity Of redemption
and interest in and to said premises and
certificate, and for other and further re.
lief.
Reference is had to complaint for par
ticulars.
And you are hereby notified that II you
fall to appear and answer the said COM
plant, as above required, the said plain
tin will apply to the Court for the relief
demanded In the said complaint.
Given under my hand and the seal OF
the Superior Court of the State OF Cali
fornia, in and for the county Of Los An.
geles, this oath day of December, in the
year of our Lord one thousand eight hum
dred and eighty.
lseal;I oproNA A; w; POTTS. Clerk.
THOS. B. BROWN, District Attorney.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

The People of the state of California.
plalntifi, VS. A. A. Rawson. defendant.
Action brought In the superior Court
OF tne State OF California. in and for the
county or Los Angeles, and the com.
plant nled In said county OF Los Apge.
perior Court.
The People of the State of California
known owner and holder " Of cer raS sn
OF purchase No. 7l76 Of the following de-
scriDed State lands: Location No. 1902, g
OF NE 4 Sec ., TT s. RS w, 8 B M, con-
Isininy ~ acres. situated in Los Angeles
county, California, defendant
You are hereby required to appear in
an action brought against you by the
above named plaintiff In the Superior
Court OF the State Of California, In and
swer the complaint filed therein, within
ten Gays exclusive of the day OF service)
after the service on you of this Summons
III served within this county; or, If
served elsewhere; within thirty days-or
against you, according to the prayer Of
said complaint. Va
The said action Is brought to obtain a
decree Of this Court for the foreclosure Of
ssd G in ths Of purchase No; 7i7s,
cuted BY the said plaintiff to the said de-
iendaut on the 24ih day Of January, A d
1877, forecloslng all of defendant's inter.
SsS Snu W .Iu0 lOllOWlDg described
land, to wit: 8 " ofNEk Sec 8, IT'S. r
". M, containing 90, acres, situated
IN Los Angeles county, state Of Califor.
MIA; TO cancel and annul the said certif-
cate OF purchase; thatjplaintiff may have
Judgement and execution against the said
DEFENDANT for the costs Of suit, includ-
ing 80 compensation of the District At.
t0rney and ~ 70-1O0 costs Of publication:
end Tor such other and further relief a.
seems meet and agreeable TO equity; and
also That the defendant, and all persons
claiming by, through or under him, may
pc barred and foreclosed of all right, IT,
Tie. claim, lien, equity of redemption
ana interest In ana to said premises and
ceruncate, and for other and further re-
ticulars. -0- pa
And'you are hereby notified that ifyou
iail 70 appear and an swer the said com.
plant as above required the said plain.
TIN Will APPLY to the Court for the relief
demanded In the said complaint.
0iven under my hand and the seal of
the superior Court of the State Of cali
forn1a, IN and for the county OF Los An.
geies, this 24th day Of December, in the
year OF our Lord one Thousand eight hun.
dred and eighty. (Seal.J
By A. RIMPAU, Deputy,
ThOs. u. BROWN, District Attorney.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
DISSENTING OPINION.

/ dissent for the reasons herein
after stated:
!. The lands In controversy are
lands attempted to be located and
patented as lieu lands, so called,
and are within the exterior lines of
what had been claimed to be the
Rancho Sausal Redondo, o Mexican
grant. At least two Surveys OF the
grant have been made, and there
was . controversy between the
owners of the grant and others as
to whether the la6ds involved in
this suit and other lands were or
were not to be included within the
f1usl survey and confirmation. Not
until 1875. was the survey of the
grant finally approved by the Com
missioner of the General Land
Once; which survey excluded the
lands from the grant. Previous to
that time, as the controversy pro-
Rressed, plats and surveys had been
1lod and withdrawn. Plaintiff
elaine title under a State patent.
He was never In possession. In my
opinion the State patent, issued be.
toFe 1875, aud based upon proceed.
1ngs Of the various land officers be.
fore 1875, Is void, and can be ques.
TONED by any person in possession.
Rel0r to 1875, the State no title TO
grant, and the assumption by it's
omcers Of the power to grant, and
the location and patent, were void
aots.
3. The several defendants defend
L. hi At<-l
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
SUM MONS.

In the Superior Court of the State Of
California, In and for the county of Los
The People of the State of California,
plaintiff, VS. Rafael Carbajal, defendant.
Action brought In the superior Court
OF the State Of California, in and for the
County Of Los Angeles, and the Com
plant filed In said county OF Los Angeles,
The People Of the State Of California
send greeting TO Rafael Carbajal. the un-
purchase Ia No 1850, Of the following de.
scribed state lands: Location No "a, SW
u of SIC Il, Sc u Of SW II Sec 10, NE u of
NV Il Sec Is SKnW W, b M, CON.
tanning i2O acres sitIated In Los Angeles
You are hereby required to appear in
an action brought against you by the
above named plaintiff in the Superior
Court of the state OF California, in and for
the complaint filed therein, within ten
days exclusive of the day of servicej
Alter the service on you OF this summons
-ifserved within this county; or. tfserved
elsewhere, within thirty days-or 1udg.
ment by default will be taken against
plant.
the said action is brought to obtain a
a certain certificate of purchase No 1880
described In the said complaint and exc
cuted by the said plaintiff to the said de-
fendant on the 10Th day OF April, A ID
1871, foreclosing all of defendant's inter-
est In and to the following described
land, to wit: SW n Of Sc Il, Sc n Of SW
n Sec 10: NE u ofNWN Sec Is TBS II II
W, 8 b M, containing 100 acres,
situated in Los Angeles cOun-
ty, State OF California; to cancel and an.
null tho said certificate of purchase; that
plaintiff may have judgment and execu.
ton against said defendant for the costs
of suit, including $40 compensation of the
District Attorney and 81 70-l0O costs of
publication, and 70 r such other and fur
fher relief as seems meet and agreeable
to equity; and also that the defendant
and all persons claiming by, through or
under him may be barred and fOreclosed
of all right, title, claim, lien, equity of
redemption and in terest in and to said
premises and certificate and for other and
further relief
reference is had to Complaint for par.
ticulars.
And you are hereby notified that II you
fail to appear and answer the said com.
plaint as above required, the said plain.
tiff will apply to the court for tho relief
demanded In the said complaint.
Given under my hand and the seal OF
the Superior Court Of the State Of Cali
6ornia, in and for the county OF Los
Angeles, this gath day OF December. In
the year Oh our Lord, one thousand eight
hundred and eighty.
A. W. POTTS, Clerk.
By A. MORTON, Deputy.
THOS. B. BROWN. District Attorney.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.
In the Superior Court OF tae stat o. O.
f0rnla. In and Tor the county Of ]
Angeles.

The People OF the State of CaliforpA|
plaintiff, Us. John Smith, defendant,
Action brought In the Superior G.
of the State Of California. in and for
counGy OF Los Angeles, and the compll1
lsd in sai tsc county Sn q L! LSs Angsiss n
The People Of tho State Of California I'd
greeting 10 John Smith. the unkno
owner and holder OF certificate OF n
chase No. $3.50. OF the following descrIk
state lands: Location No. 1855, 9 n q
10. T5N, R8W. = B NJ, containing,
California, defendant.
You are hereby required to appear In IN
ton brought against you by the above mani
plaintiff, In the Superior Court Of the 81
OF California, in and for the county Of 4
Angeles, and to answer the complaint &
OF service) after the service ON you OF 4
summons--if served within this county;
II served elsewhere within thirty days.
judgment by default will b taken a9Aill
you. according to the prayer Of said &C
plant.
The said actl len, !: !, , s to obtain
certain certificate of purchase No. 6t
described in the said complaint and 81
cuted by the said plaintiff TO the said 4,
fendant on the 10Th day Of September
d 1876, forecloslng all Of defendants Il
JoTebL Ill anu W I0o lOlIOWluk O08CIlVt
land. to wit: Sec 10, T5 N. h 8 w. q
NJ, containing $40 acres. situatsd In II
Angeles county, State OF California;:
cancel and annul the said certificates
purchase: that plaintiff may have jud
ment and execution against said deiepl
ant for the costs OF suit, including
compensation OF the District Attorn}
and 81 70.l00 costs Of publication. and q
such other and further relief a. seer
meet and agreeable to equity; and gll
that the defendant, and all perso,
claiming by, through or under him, ma
be barred and forecloped OF ali right, I
tie, claim, lien, equity ofredemption 81
interest in and to said premises and OF
tincate, and for other and further reli
Reference 10 had TO complaint for pr
ticulars.
And you are hereby notified that II ~
fail to appear and answer the said cor
plant. as above required, the said plat,
tiff will apply to the Court Tor the RET.
demanded In the said complaint.
Given under my hand and the zeal Of 81
Superior Court OF the State Of California.
and for the county Of Los Angeles, this 81
day of December. In tho year Of our Il
one Thousand eight hundred and eighty. |.
BY A. RIMPAU. DEPUTY.
THOS. B. BROWN. District Attorney, :
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Petition for the Pardon of the
Mussel Slough Ssttlcrs.

Following is the text OF a petit.
ton now In circulation asking the
President OF the United States to
exercise executive clemency to.
ward the five Mussel Slough set.
tiers who have been convicted Of
resisting an officer of the United
States, and heavily sentenced
therefor. We have sheets of the
petition at our Office and all who
wish to add their names to the list
of siguers arc invited to call:
PETITION.
To His E1cetiency rutherford B.
Hayes, President of the United
States:
The undersigned, citizens and
residents of the United States of
America, residing at the places Get
opposite our respective names.
without regard to party, most ur.
gently and respectfully beseech
your Excellency TO extend I IRA.
ctons pardon unto ]. J, Doyle.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

The People of the State Of Califbr}
plaintiff, VS. A. A. Rawson, defendant
Action brought in the Superior &C H.
OF the State Of California, in and for |
county Of Los Angeles, and the Of |
plant nled IN said county of Los Al
les, In the ofdee of the Clerk Of said
The People Of the State of CaliforI
send greeting to A. A. Rawson. the
known owner and holder or osrli1cat
pure hase No. TIT, Of the following !
scribed State lands: Location No. Il
Lots 2 and 8 and SE n Of Sc u SEQ "a,
situated In Los Angeles county, CALI
mia, defendant.
You are hereby required to appear
an action brought against you BY
above named plaintiff In the Supel
Court Of the State Of California, ii
for the county Of Los Angeles. and e,
ten days Exclusive OF the day Of servl
after the service on you of this summ}
If served within this county; or,
served elsewhere, within thirty days,
judgment by default Will be tal
against you, according to the prayed
said complaint.
The said action is brought to obta},
decree Of this Court for the foreclosure
certain certificate OF purchase No. II
described In the said complaint and 81
cuted by the said plaintiff tn tine said
fendant on the 24th day of January, Il
1877, fOreclosing all OF defendants In |,
est In and to the following desert
land, to wit: Lots 2 and and Be 4 Oh
4 Sec 81, T 8S, H 8 w, 8 B M, containV
1912 acres, situated In Los Angeles col
ty, State OF California; tO cancel and <
null the said certificate OF purchase; u
plaintiff may have Judgment and exec
ton against said defendant for the co.
Of suit, including $40 compensation
the District Attorney, and 81 70.100 CO
of publication, and for such other q
further relief as seems meet and agree
BILE to equity; and also that the said 1
PENDANT, and all persons claiming
through or under him, may be barr
and fOreciosed OF all right, title, clail
lien, equity Of redemption and inter,
IN and to said premises and certincs,
and for other and further relief.
Reference is had to complaint for pi
ticulars.
And you are hereby notified that II "
fail to appear and answer the said &C
plant as above required, the said pie
till will apply to the Court for the rel
demanded In the said complaint.
Given under my hand and the seal
the Superior Court oil the State OF Calf
MIA, In and for the county OF Los An
les, this Gath day OF Decem Der, In d
year Of our Lord one thousand eight hv|
o'eq qs aaH 1'en''' Nv. POTTS, Clerk
By A. RIMpAU, Deputy.
THOS. B. BROWN, District Attorney.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.
In the Superior Court of the State of Cal.
ifornia, In and for the county OF Los
Angeles.

The People of the State of California,
plaintiff, VS. West Evans, defendant.
Action brought in the Superior Court
of the State Of California, in and Tor the
plant filed in said county of Los Ange.
les, in the ONCE OF the Clerk of said Su-
perior Court.
send greeting to West Evans, the un.
OF purchase No. 6847, of the following de-
scribed state lands: Location No. 900, N
= SEQ 10 Ten, Rl2W,S B NJ. contain
ing $40 acres. sttuated in Los Angeles
ty, California. defendant.
You are hereby. required TO appear In
an action brought against you by the
above named. plaintiff in the 6uperier
Court q the 9tete Of California, a and
s; = s ;;S:;l {; =; u; i s.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, l..
County OF Los Angeles. 3d.
i, Il. f. Spence, Cashier of the above.
named Bank, do solemnly swear that
the above statement is true to the best
OF my knowledge and belief.
Il. +. SPENCE, Cashier,
Subscribed and sworn to before me,
this 10Th day OF January, 1881.
(Seal.) j. A. GRAVES,
Notary Public.
CoRRECT-Attest:
j. Il. HOLLENBECK,l
.. 3. WITHEKBY, Directors.
X. #. SPENCE,
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
NOTICE FOE PUBLICATION OF II
FOB PROVING WILL, Eyp,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, l.
County Of Los Angeles. -
~ THE SUPERIOR cQuRT.
In the matter Of the EotAte OF Maria I
/. tonia Villa Do Aeyes, deceasod.

Pursuant to an order Of this Court ma
this day. NOTICE is hereby given that !hu:
dday. the third day Of 1sbruary. =.
courtroom OF this Conyt. IN the city .,
county OF Los Angeles, has beon appoipt,
for hsaring the application Of los LTD,
document now on Ale IL this Oo1ft, pufp6
inglto BE- the last viii ana tsst6aaeet !,
admitted to probate. an6 tkaS loft
Parliamentary DO issued thereon 70 aid j
titi0ners, ct which time and p1aeo
persons interested therein may apDoaf q
contest the same. =
Dated January 10. 1881.
Nv e. Il. OWN. psputy. no a.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

STATE oo Sn SA d Les Angeles. SIS.
Isaias w. Hellman, President. and
John MilAen Secretary, being duly and
severally sworn, each for HIMSELF say
that the foregoing statement is true, to
the best OF their knowledge and belief.
signed:
1SAIAS w. HELLMAN, President.
JOHN MILNER. secretary.
Subscribed and sworn to before me,
this l9th day of January, A. ID. 1881.
Signed: ROBERT H. CHAPMAN,
Notary Public.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
CHANGE Of ROvIE.

THE KERN AND INYo COUNTY
Have changed their route from Nojavs
TO Caliente.
Fae2engen destined for Inyo county
5ssis W.. HA1xz1zoM lsssx
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, lss
County of Los Angeles. S.
Isaias w. Hellman, President. and
John Miner. Secretary, being duly and
severally sworn, each for himself, say
that the foregoing statement of capital
actually paid is true to the best OF their
knowledge and belief.
Signed.
lSAIAS W. HELLMAN, President.
JOHN MINER, Secretary.
Subscribed and sworn to before me,
this 10th day OF January, 1881.
Signed: ROBERT H. CHAPMAN,
jy2O-2w Notary Public.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
LEGAL.
Summons,

In the Superior Court OF the state of Cal.
Angeles. "a LAVE
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

The People Of the State Of California,
plaintiff. Va. Geo. 0riges, defendant.
Action brought IN the Superior Court
county Of Los ANGLER, and the com-
plant aled u saidfcounty Of Los Anee-
less IN re otace o. tAs olirk Of sid o..
. .'| =: -
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.

In the Superior Court of the State OF
California. In and for the county OF Los
Angeles.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Notice TO Creditors.

executrix Of the estass 81 Gsrisno Hal.
deceased, to the oFedioor1opl. and al pa
ceased, 70 exhibit theGS Win de ned
:ssy AZ, vSrs 1:'Is;s Hisss7 ssss
said exsoltrixs IS To y! e 81 WG1i5e I
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.

In the Superior Court OF the State of
California, in and for the county of
| Los Angeles.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.

In the Superior Court of the State of Cal.
Angeles.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.

In the Superior Court of the State of Gal.
ifornis, in and for the County Of Los
Angeles.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02
Summons.

In the Superior Court OF the State OF
ifornia. In and for the county OF
Angeles.
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02

CAPITAL STOCK, paid up in
Daily Los Angeles herald., 1881-02-02


ed lands in the applications men,
toned Ia the second finding, which
were with them identical in de-
scription of land applied for and the
18th and 36th sections used as q ba.
sis Of said application.
"That on the 9th day of August,
1863, Robert Gardiner, signing
himself as Surveyor.General of the
State OF California, accepted said
application at time long prior to
his election or qualification for said
office, and that said application
was never accepted by any other
person.
"Tbat thereafter, to-wit: on the
10th day Of February, 1872, Robert
Gardiner, then Surveyor-General
OF the State of California, basing
his approval upon the recital there
In, to-wit: That the location has
been made by the then Locating
Agent In the name and for the ben.
eft of the State of California. at
the Los Angeles District, in the
city of Los Angeles, with the con.
sent of List No. of said district,
Sc"aih6 OotO tuc Sttu Jay OIL N o.
vember, 1871 approved each of
said applications.
That neither the plaintiff, NJ. ],
OConnor, nor said Rosecrans, nor
the said Robert Thompson, nor
either Of them were ever Ia the act.
usl possession Of. said lands, or any
part thereof, or ever. had any Inn
provements thereon, or ever had
any portion thereof fenced or en-.
closed In any way, and that all of
said lands are rich agricultural
lands, and that the plaintiff and
his grantor have, every year since
1872, leased the lands In contro-
vsFsy 70 persons who have used the
same for graxing purposes, pastur-
Ing sheep thereon, and have 20 used
The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1881-10-26

TucsoN, A, T., October 25.--1he Texas X
facilc surveying party have applied for
military escort which has not vet been
granted The course Of the survey leads
them through the san Carlos agency to
Globe, and il is feared the Indians may
be suspicious of their movements and
cause them trouble.
| IA special 10 the Citizen from lilo Grande
says. Early this morning Mrs. r. D. Wheel.
er, wife Of the Pima Indian agent, arrived
at TINS station accompanied by three other
ladies aud young son OF Wheeler. They
report that the Salt river Indians
have become provoked at the aeent, and
having armed themselves are on their way
to attack the agency. They say these re-
ports are verified by old settlers on
The Salt river who are arriving ut
the agency, Rev. Mr., Cook, an old resident
AZ the agency expressed himself ns much
alarmed at the outlook II seems that the
Indians are IN the habit of going to neigh
boring towns and getting drunk, Wheeler
had them arrested for this, and punished
them by compelling them to labor. This
Is thought to be the cause of the threatened
difficulty. They are said 10 be 90 strong
and VIII probably appear at the agency to-
day What makes this movement somewhat
uncNplalnablc is the fact that they have
always been peaccablc towards the whites
though implacablc foes Of the Apaches for
whom In times past they were more than
match. IL is not thought anything serious
will come Of this as the Indians when they
started were probably under the influence
ofliquor, and by the time they reach the
agency they will be sobcrcd down and will
not care tO carry out their threats. The
agency guard consists Of officers and teach
ers aud lifleen men.
The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1881-10-26
Tyler.


TYLER, October 25.-The district court
has adjourned after disposing of large
amount of both civil and criminal bust
ness
Mr.. b. +. Afford, prominent and popu.
lar merchant of this city and junior mem
Der of the firm Of Cousins d Afford, died
very suddenly at his residence last night.
Cotton bales feck the square in goodly
numbers to-day and demand good prices.
The demand, however, exceeds the supply,
and will so long as the farms yield the sta
pie. Much remains yet to be picked out
Rev. Mr. James, an evangelist from Lon
don, England, began series of meetings on
Sunday last, and has already aroused much
interest.
TYLER, October 25.--The following cases
were disposed of by the supreme court to-
day:
Cunningham q Ellis vs. Kate Moore ct
al, from Bowie county; reversed and re-
manded.
Il. X. Wilson VS.. W. X. Edward, from
Titus county; reversed and rcmanded.
Jas, Nolan ct al. VS.. w. w. Berrett et al.
irOm.Denton county; motion for rehearng
overrulcd.
l.. J. Hodges ct. al. vs.. W. Il. Donald,
from Denton county; motion for rchearing
Oycrruled.
Shayock & Rowland vs. j. ID. baltimore
and wife, from Bowie county; taken under
advisement and transferred to Galveston.
j. NJ. Selleman vs.. I. T. Gamage. from
Anderson reversed and remanded.
Watt Hall ct. al. VS.. Catherine Pemmler,
eIecutrix, from Falls county judgment nj.
tirmed.