National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1881-03-11
DISTRICT COURTS

ST PRIME COURT OF THE DIsTRICT-CHIEF-JUs-
TIcE CARTIER AND JUSTICES HAGNER AND JAMES
FafOn Griffith argument concluded and case sub
NIT d. WaIlach Fairfield: on argument.
CIRCUIT CoCRT-JUsTIcE MAcARTHUR.-Mur-
of declaration for cent damages and costs.
Lynch vs.. TOtten; dismissed without costs. Bell VS..
plaintiff. Herlihy VS. District of Columbia: juror
Withdrawn and leave given to file amended declara-
ton. Graham & Cows DOnnelly discontinued by plain
tif and leave given to Withdraw note. Lloyd VS..
Washington Gaslight Company; on hearing.
EoUITY COURT-JUsTICE WYLIE-Peters vs. Su-
ter; injunction granted Central National Bank vs.
Gunand: Eliabeth'J. Guinand appointed guardian
ad tem. Brown Us. Brown; leave granted to file
amended bill. Rowe Todd; Injunction dissolved
Cook IS. DIineSe; decree TO be prepared. Burgess
vs.. Williams: decree TO be prepared. StOtt vs.
Ashford: restraining order discharged, injunction
denied. and bill dismissed. Smith VS.. Kenny; on
hearing, Baldwin VS.. Grahamite and Trinidad Paw
ing company; pro cOnfesso against certain defend
ants Hchafert VS.. Mades ct AL substitution of trus
CRIHINAL CoURT-JUsrTCF2 Cox.-James Ford. as
SAINT IN William Washington; pleaded guilty; SEN
tenre suspended. James Ford, rs lit on William F.
nap r: pleda ID guilty; SENT nee SUS pended. John
+ Spil k, burglary and larceny; pleaded guilty;
9ienc Il 10 the Auburn State prison for three years
1laia l'hef, burglary and larceny; guilty of grand
larceny: sentenced 10 Erie County penitentiary. at
Buialc \. Y, for two years. Ric. lard Murray as
"a win Intent TO KILL plea OF guilty of assault ac
copied; senteEc 4suST ended. Richard Stewart. grand
IagCei5; rcogliizan forfeited. Thomas Forbes as
at WIN intent TO Kill Cornelius Ware; fecognizance
forfeited. Henry Matthews. burglary; jury disagreed
ana were discharged William Bailey and John
Shla@Food, grand larceny; on trial.
supreme Court of the Disric-C Chief Justice Cartier
4 9 Justices Hagner and JameS.-NO. j9l$. Capitol
mn bulIqlnS Association HiltOn No. a. GuSdorf
v " Ateler No. 81, McNar Fay; No. 81, Elhart
" Dung; No. g., Morrison Shuster; No. 6S Citf-
1eliS National Bank Callan; No. 65, Phillips vs.
SS5i[ney No IS, Cahil, alias Dimond, CahH; No.
81, AaIheH vs.. Rupert: No. a, Strait VS.. Strait
tGGG!t C0urt-JuStice MacArthur.-No. IS7, DObie
~ mn: No. 264, kimmeH et al. VS.. District of
Soiulloa; No. 20, Nevis Plant; No. "a, Anger
NAN vs. Baum; No. 27S. Moses vs. Blackburn: No. 49,
HnliaS q Co vs.. Hlghm9n: No. 2S2, Bartlett & VIII
liiN use &c, VS.. District of Columbia; No. 2S4 Bur
KS " Raum: No. 2S5 Elliott trustee Cook ct al:
~ ~, Hills, Boyd d Co. Clark & Co.; No. 81
az vs. Hopkins No 90. Moses vs. Carroll; No
- MISSISSIPPI Central Railroad Company, use, &c,
%, ldElOs No. 70, Patch VS.. White; No. 100, Charter
S-Sh l.i!e insurance Company Tallmadge ct al:
NJ d Shober VS.. Hill; No. los Mcdonnell VS.. Nor
Ol' No isl GOOdhart VS.. De WandeIaer.
lluLy Court-JuStice Wylie-No. Ii, Smith VS.. Ken
T TA No. I, Mcnamara VS.. SheckleS; No. 151%,
Ee1.isoh vs. Wall No IS Bowles VS.. BowleS: No. %
S-1it l. vs. heyser; No. "A. Ashfield VS.. Ashfield;
- p heySer vs. Hitz; No. 26 BIets VS.. Robbins; No.
- c NtCe vs. Nee: No. Is, Hook vs. Lay.
SIiii!Ihal C0urt-JuStice CoX-WSlliam w. Easily
Ds s;t Win intent TO kill Cornelius Ryan; Thomas
PM ms aSSaUtlng policeman: William Siegle and
~ ciG hIlS, grand larceny: William Easily assault
~ d ponce oflcer; Isaac Lockwood grand larceny;
M! btE oeStlality; Samuel Green, policy lottery
Xmas FOrDeS, assault with intent to kill: Charles
W5SSGu, personal violence against a policeman ;
s,5 I9. IL Douglass assault; David McCutchen
iiiei Long petit larceny Charles Bryan, false