, 1881-03-31

nt tho tEnn the original article And the re-.
thu lctcrs np.,n whtrh tho article WI. Mtstsl
prior to i's l"thlicn!son. y, fnr rs there wis
tcint 10 verify cs,,nl;,nncatl,,,a Jpn, nr.,tunry
WIS pnslIshc'i lie snw The four letters referred
TO- In ehscs III Atich communications IA ihr.a
It was the c,Ist,,h To verify them l!v in1utrtnY
q tho rrat'Inr corrcer'ittcnl. W.tnr.s re.l
which +" hit destroyed white hu WIS city cli-
"r or the Tinft. Tht+ letter. s4'tupar,,'l with
'H rs %s i ss'S w III. stfr ,hat +;
attempt 'ln ecn 1nN,'.. 10 verify Il roi1ln,,nlcn-
Mr.. Frederick Cook aaIl tlust III The Tina OF
tio publication Of tho scan'ml he wIss as>isin.1t
ford .luao ]. Two uays utter the suit VII.
snnEht. t., discover tho tart* Ia tho casr.. lTo
%n.lle', .hs % rerng.,',H artcle II, haylnE lrcn
itncafurl. liz saw tho fur irttrrs. which np-
lmr,'ntly wcrn written t'y fur different ."rat,ba,
nuh must have becn deceived II thoy wr.n
ct"r, win ino hai,dwritns t Of scverai ,,erso"s
| In tluKfuri.
a 9 cr,m::cxan!natlon. - witness .a!d TINT b. wv
tho pNrts wllt,su rRtlles wrrn utrentlrl tn tho
four letters WIN prtnnnNEel shen, IarEcrn*.
anl sali ,l.at they were very eleverly tln,ie tis
ut his Investigations by Telegraph.
Counsrl thEn l'rttecetlct! IL nfuuc nnntnr of
atrr III whic H. nru man 't to .,v panns @ spv.e,
iDs the rru+rcrtlnn. nnf was funwGh lly str.
Trnlc enr lho tiGf.Ise. WIN wns still speaking
when tho Court adjourned until lhs niornng.
TIE STATE tSAUlsASCE.COstp4A
DIVIDEND.
Judge Dvtirnm0Dd yesterday n,ornjng decided
tho petition FOR review or TuiInan l. KinK In thp
( Stntu 1nsurnncc.t:omphtiy cnse.
The Jlltlgu sAfd rst. therc WAS nne point on
whirt llc wsls not quite CERTAIN. rhc uutnter ut
eimrrs subscribed for wns "s,tii l'lc number
or Ehurcs surrendered aud for which certificates
ri fill. phi1 stock wcrc iasurtt was la,9. leaving
| s.s9J ehareA TINT wero tut surrendered. Tho
| question then WIS In rnlHtlUn 10 thuso shurcs,
| ilud ~ prr cent hcGn pn!tl on thetn2
Mr. Chandler sat.i he WIS not certuin nbnut Il
himself. Tho II. 81. sharcs included atl thusu OIL
which .. per cent hui .crn pull. t)n sumo stock
| nuly sfnall nmaunis trUH ulIc- bali Of per cent
| up Ind becr I,lllJ.
Tho Judge inquired whether that portion was
considered worthless.
slr. Chandler sail 1t waa 81 understood.
Thc .fltdHu said the District Court seemed to
llnro pr,'ecptlrd tho llssHrptton thAt nlI tite
shareholders wosc IN IN entire equality. Ms we'll
~ thUsu who lntl surrendered tt,etr stock ntll!
| tnkeu 01tt certificates fur fHlt-Jmtf stuck, NY
those who hAti mt surrendered.
| Mr. Masnn nMtl hr understood lhnt tho stock
'ud bron wiped uut. cxccpt TINT on which II per
cent h.tIl lCen rut1. an lIlMt the District Court
t"k thD tfew TINT the stuck Dn which the ~ per
| cent hAtl nit bcGi, p.ttl WIS worthless.
The .]utt1D c0it!nt..u: ifn s!Il hot wat to l,e
nndcrsio.M It's pitIng&t,ny orfhitnn IN rrlus'0n tn
thu sut'xtrhnrs wlo Ind not paid ~ PER cent IN
their stock. II thuru wore any sl.eh, u1,l their
stuck WIS worth anythlnx, It seemed ~ though
tho Op!nion OF tho District Court nIilil nut liz
| sustained. ills opinion wuIld. therefore, he
based IN theory ti,at ~ 1,cr cent hau been paid
! un tho sthuk thAi wns surrendered, unI flr
| which ful-naM certificates tut hcen Issued.