Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1881-04-06
First Day of the April Term---Calendar
Called and Causes Set.

Tic organization luCluenI 10 the
appearance of the new judges, the court
simply taking its seat at the hour of II
and the clerk making the usual announce
ment. The court then announced the ap-
pointment of Messrs John B. Sanborn,
w. p Warner and j. d. O'Brien com
mittee for the examination of candidates
for admission to practice, the committee
to meet for the purpose April 18th. The
calendar was then called and causes
assigned, the session of the court being
about an hour and half. Below are the
assignments:
STRUCK FROM THE CALENDAR.
Place Bass, appellant, vs.. Oliver Anderson
and Fl. T. B. Bagge, respondents.
PASSED.
1. Ingmunson, county treasurer, plaintiff,
VS.. George Baird, defendant.
Calvin H. Rhmrill and Calsta Rumrill, by
Andrew Palmer, Jr., their guardian ad Item
and George N. Rumrill, appellants, vs. First
National Bank, ST. Adams, Vermont; Edgar
A. Keller and A. E. johnson, respondents.
Joseph Krippner, respondent VS.. Sebastian
Biebl, app elant
Cyrus Fl. Mccormick and Leander J. Nc
Cormick, partners as C. H. and l.. McCor-
mick, appellants, VS.. j. j. Kelly, respondent
Marcel Aetmann, appellant, VS.. John GA
brel, respondent.
The State of Minnesota ex rel. John W.
Cunningham, relator, vs. The Board of Public
Works of the City of st. Paul, respondent
The Board of County Commissioners of the
Tower, Fisher g. Sharer and Dennis l.. Hitch
cock, appellants.
James Kelley, respondent, VS.. The Southern
Minnesota Rail company, appellant.
John Felber, respondent, VS.. The Southern
Minnesota Railway company, appellant.
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS.
Hiram c.. Howard, RESPONDENT, vs. Ara Bar
ton, appellant.
Melvin Roblee, appellant, VS.. G. D.. Secrest,
Melvin Roblee, appellant, VS.. Abram Moses,
respondent.
Charles w. Nash, appellant, VS.. George
Tousley, respondent.
George s. Smith, appellant, VS.. 4. E. John
son, respondent. Respondent moves to DIS
miss. April6.
II. G. DeGraw, as assignee of David Ra-
maley, appellant, VS.. james King, sheriff of
Ramsey county, respondent Respondent
moves to have case made and settled. April 7.
Katie Thompson Ashton, respondent, VS..
Susan L. Thompson and Horace Thompson
(Susan L. thompson, appellant. Respondent
moves for atirmance, and also for dismissal,
on the ground the appeal is illegal. April
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. John
J. Ring, appellant Appellant moves to strike
from the calendar. April g.
Samuel d. Greenwood, respondent, VS.. viii
liam p. Murray, as the executor and trustee
named in the last will and testament of MeliZa
j. Miller, deceased, and Louisa Miller, appel
lants Respondent moves for affirmance under
rule IA. April T.
State of Minnesota, ex rel. William H. Golfer,
reator, VS.. Walter T. Burr, respondent. Re-
spondent moves to dismiss. April II.
The County of Washington, State of Mime
sofa, respondents, vs.. The German American
Bank of St. Paul, appellant Appellant moves
moves to affirm under rule II. April 6. Two
actions.
o. II. Comfort, respondent, VS.. S. Selack,
appellant. Respondent moves to affirm.
April 6.
st. Paul Harvester Works, appellant, VS..
William Nlppolt, respondent. Respondent
moves for affirmance April 6.
State of Minnesota ex rel. The Minnesota
Construction Company VS.. The Town of Lake.
Motion to remand to the district court.
April Z.
d. X. McDermott, respondent, VS.. Joseph
Thomas, appellant Respondent moves for af-
tirmance. April 6.
Eunee C. Barnum, James A Lovejoy and
Ashley c. Morrill,, partners as Barnum and
Lovejoy, appellants, VS.. Alfred Crusel,
James A. Kennedy and Carrie Kennedy, respon-
dents Appellant moves for afirmance and
respondent moves to strike from calendar.
April 6.
CAUSES SET.
Alexander ]. Mcdonald, sole surviving
partner of Alexander J. Mcdonald and John
X. Mcdonald, parteners as Mcdonald Brothers,
appellants, vs. The Minneapolis Lumber Co.
May 80.
The First National Bank of st. Paul, appel
liant, VS.. Henry Nathan, s. A. Hooper and
Daniel L.. How, respondents. April 8.
Amanda Turnbull, Respondent vs. Herman
Schroeder, appellant. April 8.
Andrew Allison, as executor of the tesla
ment of Philip Van Buren,, deceased, appellant,
VS.. Thos. II. Armstrong, E. NJ. Armstrong,
Mrs. Eva E. Mars, ton formerly Miss Eva E.
Bates ct. al, respondents. May 81.
Orange Walker, Samuel Judd and William
H. Veaze, co partners as Walker, Judd and
Veazie, respondents, VS.. Abram johnson, ap-
pellant Maya
William l.. Mintzer, respondent, VS.. The viii
lage of Rush City, appellant. Two causes. May
II.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, vs..
William Simpson, appellant. May 3.
The State of Minnesota, respondent, VS.. II.
H. Wilson, appellant. May TO-.
D. L. Libby, respondent, VS.. Iver E. HUSKY,
Ole E. Sonstelie and John Sonstelie, implead-
ed with Christian Mlkkelburg, appellant.
April A.
Daniel L Libby, respondent, vs.. Christian
Mikkelburg, appellant. April IA.
George w. Tyler, respondent, vs. Amasa B.
Hanscom, and j. II. Mountain, partners as
Hanscom, Mountain & A. P. Qulst, appel
lants. April 26.
William s. Stevens, respondent, VS.. Andrew
P. Johnson, appellant. April II.
Ed H. Folsom, respondents. The Board of
County Commissioners of Chisago county,
appellant May II.
Ozias P Smith, respondent, VS.. William I.
Conkwright; William Cartwright, Mary
Conkwright and Christian PREM, appellants.
April rs.
James Drea, respondent, VS.. F. A. Cariveau
and j. S. Friedman, appellants. May 80.
Van H. Higgins, respondent, VS.. Harvey S.
Dale, appellant May 81.
Margaret Shaber, as administrative of Hen
ry Shaber, deceased, respondent, VS.. The st.
Paul, Minneapolis d Manitoba railway CON-
pany, appellant. Mays.
John Mahoney, appellant, vs.: Donald Ste.
venson, defendant, and The First National
Bank of St. Paul, garnishee, and Mclean &
McNider, claimants, respondents: May 10.
A. F. Lesher, respondent, vs.. J. E. Getman,
n B. HARDWOOD, O. H. Durkee, G. j. Hopping,
O. H. Phillips, C. Gotzan, Claiming Seabury,
Richard Gordon, George L. Farwell, ct al, APP
pellants. April 13.
A. H. Reed, appellant, vs. Edward Lammel,
respondent April 10.
Charles Butler, appellant, VS.. The Winona
Mill company, respondent. May Is.
John Steele, respondent, VS.. John W. Bond
and Joanna Bond. appellants. May 9.
Henry L. Williams and Charles H. Bgelow,
trustees of the estate Of Eliza Alley, respondent,
VS.. Crawford Livingston, appellant. april s.
Hedge Olson, respondent, VS.. Cornelius K.
Orton, appellant. april 20.
Ellen Craig, respondent, VS.. Henry Cook,
appellant. april 20.
James McNaughton. respondent, VS.. Garlic
to, CoIIere anneIlant Anril 81.