The weekly democratic statesman. [volume] (Austin, Tex.) 1871-1883, 1881-06-30
THE COURTS.
couRr OF APPEALS.

Ex-parte Rogers appeal from Travis.
Affirmed
Ex-Parte Sartin; appeal from Grayson.
Affirmed.
Ziechang v. The State; appeal from
Williamson. Affirmed.
Wilbanks V. The State; appeal from
johnson. Affirmed.
Mckee ct al. v. l.. Gettes; appeal from
Guadalupe. Motion for rehearing over
ruled.
NE. Craddock vThe State; appeal from
Dallas. Affirmed.
n 4. CraddOek ". The State; appeal
from Dallas. Affirmed.
Walton V. The State appeal from Bur-
Lesson. Reversed and remanded.
Eiseatohr v. The State; appeal from
Dallas. Affirmed.
wilbanks V. The State; appeal from
johnson. Reversed and remanded.
JOEL V. The State; appeal from john
son. Affirmed
Heath V. The State appeal from John
son. Motion to strike out granted.
John Ruston v. The State; appeal from
Dewitt. Reversed and remanded.
Il. A. Blandford V. The State; appeal
from Travis. Reversed and remanded.
Duty V. The State ; appeal from Falls.
Affirmed on certificate.
Collum v. The State appeal from Ma
yarro. Reversed and remanded. .
Moses Allen V. The State; appeal from
johnson. Affirmed.
NJ. j. Montgomery V. n. Q. Henderson
and John Ireland /; appeal from Travis.
Motion for rehearing overruled.
T. Erwin v. The State; appeal from
Tarrant Reversed and remanded.
Harry Hill v. The State; appeal from
Fort Bend. Reversed and remanded.
Henry Fricke v. The State; appeal
from Guadalupe. Dismissed.
Tom BOstick v. The State; appeal from
Colorado. Reversed and remanded.
j. Britton v, The State; appeal from
Ellis. Reversed and remanded.
Henry Harper v. The State; appeal
from Camp. Reversed and remanded.
j: G.. Eds v. The State appeal from
Tarrant. Reversed and remanded.
Judge Hunt dissented as to the admis-
Utility of the nOtary's certificate of pro-
test for any purpose.
Ben. Gregg v. The State; appeal from
Hood. Affirmed.
George S. Burroughs VA. L. Burch; APP
peal from Milan. Dismissed.
Zip Massiev. The State; appeal from
Camp. Affirmed.
Mike Gallagher V. The State appeal
from Parker. Affirmed. ..s
Judge Hurt rendered dissenting opin-
ion in the case of BrittOn v. The State.
SUPREME COURT. .t
Hodges V. Donald; appeal from Denton
Reversed ana renamed.
Nolan ct al. V. Bennett ct al; appeal
from GraysOD. Reversed and remanded.
Peters v. Asbeck ct al; appeal from
Washington. Reversed and remanded.
Woodbridge V. Cook; appeal from La
mar. Affirmed.
Moore v. Bell; appeal from McLennan.
| Affirmed.
Franklin V. Hunter; appeal from Hill.
| Affirmed.
Terrey V. Kruce; appeal from HOOD.
| Affirmed.
Carter v. Robinson; appeal from Ma,
varro. Affirmed.
Ravay v. Rosie; appeal from Travis
Affirmed.
Steudham V. Gribble; appeal from
| Grayson. Affirmed.
White V. Lively; appeal from Dallas
Affirmed.
Galloway ct al. v. The State; appeal
from Travis. Affirmed.
Moore, clerk of district court of Wash,
| ington county, V. Bassett & Bassett APP
! peal from Washington. Affirmed.
Lee v. Selman; appeal from San Saba
! Reversed and remanded.
1 AleXanderY. Mulhull; appeal from Ellis
Report of Commissioners of Appeal
adopted. Affirmed.
MBrOOks v. Clark; appeal from Grayson
otion for rehearing granted.
The following cases taken under adj
| Visement were transferred by the Su
preme Court to Tyler.
Lindsey v. jeffrey " Co.; appeal from
| Cook
McCreary & Barlow v. Cans appea
| from Tarrant.
Wright V. Wilson ct al; appeal from
Ellis.
Edwards V. Thurman ct al; appeal from
| Dallas.
Ryan ct al V. Wilson ct al appeal from
| Tarrant. -....
Edwards V. Wheeler; appeal from
| Travis.
g., H. & S. A. r. r. Co. V. Pfeuffer
appeal from Guadalupe.
Barnhardt V. KIngsbury; appeal
from BeXar.
from McLennan
East Texas ri1e Insurance Company
VS.. Reese appeal from Bell.
Gambrell V. Steele appeal from Nc
| Lehman.
Marshal V. Crawford; appeal from
Bell.
Conatser V. BOas and Ellis; appeal from
Tarrant. Affirmed.
COMMISSIONERS OF APPEALS.
The following cases were transferre,
to Tyler by the Commissioners of Ap
peals: Cassidy, administrator V. Smith
administrator. Appeal from Travis.
Ray ct al. V. Doty ct al; appeal from
Falls.
UNITED STATES COURT.
In this court the cases against the gen
tlemen from Washington county, charged
| with intimidating voters, were dismissed
The district attorney then filed infor
nation against Mayo, one of the cOlore'
witnesses for defense, charging him will
perjury. He was arrested, but imme
diately gave bond and his case will com
up atthe January term of the court.
The United States ". Pearson. Motion
to transfer the case to San Antonio
granted.
The United States V. Anschickes. Mo
ton to arrest judgment argued and takel
under Amusement. ....
DISTRICT COURT.
Hon. A, S. Walker, judge.
Nos. 3293- 5295-The State v. Hurlock
defendants exceptions to Indictment sus
tanned. Indictment quashed-Offens
barred by limitation.
No. 6011-The State v. HurlOck defend
ants exceptions to indictment oYerruled
and case passed till Monday, before an
nouncement.
No. $500 (civil)-The State v. n. Blunt
ger etal. I; suit on official bond Of sheriff
and collector. Judgment for defendants
No. 5610-Thc State v. j. w. Stockley e
al. suit on official bond Ofsheriff and col
lector. Judgment for plaintiff for $780,
and costs.
The state v. Henry o. Rogers. De
PENDANT admitted to bail IN the sum o
5000, with Fl. Ii. Hazard and w. ii. Say
lor as sureties.
No. 5567-The State V. J. w. Wyett e
al. suit on official bond as tax collector