, 1881-12-30

Of "1lr. e. Grafton and |
splGrD III Search Of s1te Picturesque.
London s0rlnty huB bceh much nKitnfei by tho |
llvorco suit Of Mnntly Va. Mu,,,ly and the Earl
,f Shrewsbury. This. says tho Loiun Iett-
Jtuph, was tho petition 0f tho husband.
gentleman IT fortune, for thu dissolution
nj tho marrinxe on tho ground Ut tho
aslultcry' of hia wife, Mrs. Ellen Mary
l'u'tner 3foorcwoud Mu,dy. With tho CO. rnsut,rd-
cnt, rho 1T. Hon. Charles Henry john Chetwynd
lMibot, Eart ot Shrewsbury. Answers were iiIed
donyins the oharKo' but prent!cally shoro was
no tlGtgilsc.
slr. ludorwfck, q. c.; Alr. 1sayfnr,l and 1tr. |
Hum, with whUm wins Sir John liu'kur. Q. G.. |
were counsel for the petitioner; the Solicitor.
uoneraL. HIr Farror iicrsche'l. Q. c.. and Mr..
Witt appeared for tho respondent, und str linr-
t1Inge 1ttfard. Z. T., and Mr. Pike wrro for Lord
Shrewsbury,
In npcntng tho casc Mr. 1nIlcrwIck, Q. C., said
that tho pctItionGr was mnrrctl to tha respond.
cut Oh Sept. =, lS7'a. ut tho parish church of
Ashoyer, In Dcrbystrc. They ,nltcrw,1rf lived
together, principally ut shiploy Hull, ncnr
Derby, Mr.. MuM!y'H residence. Last your they
,nuso the acquaintance Ut Lord SHREWSBURY,
wh1 wis thon II SounR nun between l9 nla ~
hu being rcEHttGu us visitor ut Tho hulisG AftEr
short tnc, nhuut tho wlntrruf lust yonr Mr.
Munly Thought his wEfc wiis rAthor too Intimate
tho subject, INT sno wins mt very anlenable 10
runson; In tho mnnth Of February Of tho prcenmt
year Mr. Mundy fGlihd TINT tho respondent still
continued to b. In tho s1esHty Ut LOra HhreWs.
bury. unu hn Kavu directions lint the cl-rospun,t-
c,t ahou!d mt be received lntn tho housc: tho
ly tllu psttiu,ler llu.rd lhNt Ills vito Ind ngaIn
been seen with Lori Shrewsbury; III April Of
tho present ysnr sue went to Ynr1uuy to visit
her atstcr, mid Mr. Mnndy c0rrestlnndcd with
her upon nlect,onntu terms: IN ula Of tho let
ters she wrutc snylng tint her sister thought
stux sS1 sSat sa cut NJ ' to pas
to prDvide 40Ino ronms for her IN London:
she It apncareta: cbrs,u 10 town With her maid
war.l wont anrond togesher; sho. sent ber mud
tn tho petitioner md wrGte him letter.
""YYoa "Y will sN bs SURPRISED / ani sons e to
leave you, for better ur wGrac; i hope for
tao former: Hnrit 70 think you Tor all your
cat,f,ot nek to SEQ my Guild ng.t1n. fur nm suro
you would not Rr,.tt It; hnl,c y9u WY .lnrgtvo
r. aa 5 tanx v M 1ns hannss s sis
ter Mr. SiunGy tilt iilmscIl into .oon,ntnleilton
viii hls wIios 6rotnor, an'l af!er inuk!,x ia:
ilnIln9 tho respondent and .es'-Tcsl'ofdrnt
th9y wont on to 'stu,sbo!rg. Upon 1lrriving
ssS at 'ry g say ,sr oF r. 'sS o,axo% ss % syy
brnthar, tun,put out of tho cnrraec md rushed
after tts train. Iig ~ suesecded y aMett,nK M Into
but she had since rnJpncd lord Shrewsbury,
VIZ H. Thhs Hfts ~ EWSr %ts ' ss 5s,uE EBuy examined
by Mr: lmderwIck. .: G., sud: nm the rvtt-
tionSr n ths casc r. was m III, a1rna , 1 t. tn1 re- =
anu WIS u ycars of age; taere wus ono child
btlrn an Aug. H. 1871; mule thu ucqua!ntn0uo
of Lord Shrewsbury souo time III tho spring Of
slr james Itannet,-1iad you n.y occupation!
Wtt,css-No, my Lord.
| shipicy Hail, i,oar Desby; Lord shrewsbury was
x9tof ot iSso I Tesetyod !aforinnfiea +, saat n,y
bury. and let,uku tu her t>ll tho subject,