, 1881-08-20
RETURNED TO BROOKLYN.
THE CARPENTER AND THE BAtooakEEtElt'H y


HlFE+
Tho story Of an oopomont In low lifo was toll
In Wednesdays TRIBUNE, tho principals being
1fcnry Cooper and Mrs. MnrEnrct 1k1ntn, OF
nsoUkiyu. Tho latter hAd loft her husband, n
saoOnkcepor, and takGn with har two 81, ,00O
bonds and some money and cnnlo to ChtcnEo
With 00eppcr, who had also ttcHortcd tho right
ful purtnor OF bis bosom. Thoy wore arrostoil
lly ono OF Pinkortuns mon, and tnilod in default
vi furnishing 5000 bonds cnuh. pending nm cx-
animation for iaracnY before Justicu Summer.
field.
They woro before Judge Gardner III tho Grim
inal Court iu tho morning, Col EllridH6, their
Rttorncy. havlnv ]'cd n petition for u writ uf
habcas corpus. The shorlr's return showed that
tho prisoners wcro hold By vlrtuo OF n nltti1nis
issued by Justice Slltnmorlcld, tho chnrRe
against them, being "fugitivcs from Justice"
Asststant-stato's-Att Thomson siado tho
point TINT, rs tho parties woro await
Ing n further examination before y
one wh;uh cou!a So eoslaesoa ' py tho As coHr
Judge Gurdnor Bul.1 he would not Interfere until
Ss ar ~ scs ~ ~9F No b9ynE yoEsk oke to y
tSs @ atteraoes SO s!'sa before ss%@es!'eid ri 81
runway couple cxprussod tho wish to be taken
BACK 70 Enoklyn for prosecution, p and bccnuao
nutoctivcs leoach aud 1iurko'ot tho lirooklyn
thoIn hack. Tho uiilcars staftei om thoir rcturn
With tho runaway couple Inst might. .
lAEEUEAlUK IL LUG slAlDtuUH&8HL luH uEkVuuuAkH
in this case, thcy haye lono nothing for which
THEY CAN DE HELD GnlMtxALLY lsKspOEstD1E,
although thoy may, have played havoc With tho
tnnrAlittos. For this roAsGn, perhaps, thoy wuro
ntt tho illrrc willing tu 10 back TO Drnnklyn.
since thoy expected to yet free transportation
aud to bo discouraged wien thuy reaehed thore.
According to tho wDtnntI'a declaration. she Was
d pnrtnUr with her husband in tho management
Ut tho saloon business. She nsstst1d III carrying
1t OIL. Tho bunk HcC1unt was In hUr nAlip.
Tho checks werP signed by her. And she wlls,
therefore, entitled to q share OF tho business,
Hhn took whit sho considered tho stuallest hplf
OE the net yllluD 'Of tho Conccrii.. lcAvfu8 Her
husband tho at0r0 and stock IN tfhtlG. II she
-,yns Il partner With Him, ghG cannot 10 held for
! lnrcony for hayfnR takun what belonged to bur.
As for Nr. Qoepper, It Ia dlAlcult to SEQ whit
| u(Yet,ae cait b9 proved Hgutnst him. tlc was
| chrrKcd with hong AcccasOry to tho larceny,
but It tho woman took her own property, thoil,
Of course, thurc, IT, no onse Agnlnat
| him. Even Though ho loft Now York
| With anothor man'b wife, nnd travelled With hGr
| Nil tho why to ChttngQ. uGGupyInY rAthor 1nti-
| mato relations with hpr, too, Il iB doubtful
| whothor auy indictment for ndultcry could bc
| found ngnnst him, for there was not TINT Dpet,
and notorious living together which Is necessary
to constitute thnt otfenso 8lt,ce sho wont will.
tngIy, OF course lc eunhOt bo chArgcd with hav-
| ing abducted hrr.. His conduct WIS. perbnps
| Bluh ~ 10 Justify aIr. Klein In suing hin for
tatnaEcs Or III applying Tor divorce. but III the
present condition OK tho law III this country d
1nnn ean 70 OF with his ne1yhb1r's wife, nnd hC
nbscnt a reasonable length of time, without bo.
| coming liRblo to any crl,niual proceeding.