Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1881-03-29

JONATHAN BLAKE,
Court adjourned Thursday morning,
after having been in session fifteen days.
The term has no, been equalled in length,
BY any since March, 1877.
The cases tried the last week OF Cont,
were the following
No. l2l, Elylra Sargent vs.. Charles W.
Pierce and Bethel Steam Mill Co, trustee.
The principal defendant was owing
plaintiff 81 $50 for board OF workmen iu
the season OF 1872; the defendant was a
contractor under The Bethel Steam Mil
Co., and 70 save her debt, she trusteed the
Company the Company had disclosed that
nothing was due to the said Pierce. and
the plaiutia il,el liesations--SixtcCn In
uumber-eoutradictiug The disclosure, and
went 70 the court on the proofs. She
claims thar 40 The time OF tbs service or
the writ, The president OF the Steam Mil
Co, and is Clerk. both admitted more
than enough in The hands OF the Company
TO satisfy her claim; that she was advised
by the Company. 10 trustee aud save her
debt that she d.d 50 aS we'll as others
now the company come and claim nothing
due from the company, aud the plaintiff
introduces several witnesses aud the cou-
tracts. books, &C.. OF The company, aud
also the principal defendant, Pierce, TO
coutradic, the disclosure. The cour; re-
served It's decision. and is to render jldg-
mcut afler fully investigating the evidence.
Foster. Bishe'.
Ne. 256, Fanny Grir.,h ys. VIM. Doug
lass.
This is an action ag1ins, the Sheriff Of
oxford County for the gct OF his deputy,
4. Il. Goodwin. in attaching and selling a
TO, OF household property belonging 10 the
Bethel House on Bethel H!u, which the
plaintiff claims 20 own as mortgage. under
a mortgage from her daughter ana J. T.
Bardcu. The mortgage was made AZ The
tim, they novel 20 B,,hel, aud puyporiS
TO cover the furniture then 10 the house,
and also such a, might from time 10 time.
be Afterwards acquired. This Is the real
question. aal The ease goes forward on
-. p,,.,
Hammons. Frye.
No lli Fance,,a Fletcher vs.. John
Uealj.
This was an action 70 recover compsn.
satloo for w..c, OF pl,i.ur. for labor In
r,milyor defendant. !D m, summer Of 1876.
The p,si.tr claim. tllt the dscpdau,
came 20 South Paris ara engaged her. and
agreed "a .igr lc- uAs,cyer she might
a.t.,h,t bi, yIc. MS Sick and be dlJ not
car, what she asked. That ,he went and
worked TN w..k, and labereI hard. and
charged l,im 81 81 rer week. doing al the
work b. thc hons, ana Nursing his sick
,-r. ,.r.r.,. nm. ,,yr,en, IN the os.
OF tle sevie- machine. ami in lost time
srl,f,.r,c. o,ur,r,d tbcplsIutig This the
called severn, witness.
=, .l,,y ,t. ,,,uc or her work yerllc,
Co. r,,;,,,g,,r ,,,o,,, cr,,n.5
-, sw,s.r
..,,,.. .-..-.,. .,,. .-,,t ,y,. So.
v...,-.-r -, arp,nc.,l
-, - - .s' - 90, -, - -.
-, - ~. , 80. ?
,...,,, ,t,..,,i.,t-,.. e,1.c s,,ry about if,,
4A" ''''' -'''.' -| ''''''
centre one ''s-'' He i'o'e'"co 70 Tue
mouse 90 Iesl''"0,'' 10 INV q '1'N "''"
him, whercnp3n the respondent came out
and struck lin Under The eye,Gnocked him
down, held him. &c. The testimony was
somewhat conflicting, aul the jury came
IN amer receiving additional Instructions,
with a vc-iic, NJ entity Fined i've dol.
,,rs-,o cost.
Nh '-'''
ne term mas Osc" Ne'! Ousy ohe'
ANu al unusual! i"'r H'''o~' ~
diets were returned, bir.ng Tue term 10
cases were disposed o! Oy default, verdict,
DC. The continued docket
numbered DO cases az tAe opcAinS o.
the term and l22 new entries were m ado.
We understand that Of these l22 new
entries u were libels for divorce.
1o, d;,.,rsa. vva-a ,-ao,aj dor;py ,be
term as follows
,,-,..... -, 1T. pt.L.-
Bearce.
Anna II. Bennett VS.. Llewellyn E. Ben-
nett.