Sacramento daily record-union., 1881-02-14
DELINQUENT TAX LIST.

| No 41s-Against Henry d. Me;ss and lot ., h and
l. Sixteenth and Seventeenth Streets IN the city u
| Sacramento improvements and personal properly
State and county tax S24 81 Drainage DISTRICT NO
tax, 934 cents; costs, ~ 20 to'ai 'AA anu '''''
| s27 504. ,,s .,at
east 55 feet. lot 3, NJ and N, Eighth and Ninth
streets in the city OF Sacramento, improvements
and nersonal property State ana county tax,
s43S rs Drainage District No tax, $40 SO costs
s23 Is total tax and costs, S4I9 4O4.
No 422-Against John Ii. Miller and cast hail lot
/ am X. Sixte nth and Seventeenth streets and
ioonrovements and west half lot I, and L, Thir-
teenth and Fourteenth streets, IN the city oil Sacra,
| nento and Improvements, for tax on personal
property. State and county tax, S2l II Drainage
District No. tax, 834 cents; costs y 6l tetai
tax and costs, S25 log.
No 425-Against W 5 Manloye and west half lot
T. and l. Twenty third and Twenty-fourth streets,
in the city OF Sacramento, and improvements otate
and county tax So 20; Drainage District No. tax
20 cents costs II cents total tax and costs, ~ IL
No 432-Against Nichols Go. ana lot 8, & anu
r. FIrst and Second streets, in thc city of sacfa
mento and Improvements, or tax on personal prop
erty. State and county tax, 81 30 Drainage DIS
tricJ No l tax, 81 o5; costs, 81 ; total tax ana
| costs, $50 rs.
No 434-Against Daniel OConnor and south half
Of west half OF lot 10, and c, Twelfth and Ihir
teenth Streets in the city OF Sacramento and I'M
| provements state and county tax, S5 20; Drainage
district No tax, 20 cents; costs, II cents total
| tax and costs, So Il.
No 431-AmlinSt InOnaS OcnSltr ana lou :, L
and O. Twenty second and Twenty third streets, IN
the city OF Sacramento and personal property State
and county tax S2 Is Drainage District No. tax,
81 cents costs 81 Il total tax aud costs, - 344
No 43S-AgainsL William Q. Oliver and the south
57l ct of lots and 6, q and X, seventh ana fIghth
streets, in the city of Sacramento, and improve
ments for tax on personal property. State and
county tax 9S cents Drainage District No. tax,
81 cents; costs. 81 % total tax ana COSTS - UOl
No 445-AgainsJ Helen NJ. Persons and personal
property State asd county tax, S23E 81 Drainage
District No. l tax, - 49, costs, 81 So; total tax
and costs, S259 Az.
feet. south 40 feet of lot l, NJ and n, Third and
Fourth streets, in the city OF SACRAMENT ana I'M
provements. State and county tax, 50 80; Drain
age District No l tax, % cents costs, So cents
total tax aud costs, 81 IS.
branch
OFFICE OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
SACRAMENTO, May Is, 1850
To Joseph W. Houston, Assessor OF Sacramento
county-Sir: The State Board OF Equalization on
the 30th day OF April, 1850, assessed for the year
1850 the Amador Branch Railroad Company for ITS
franchise road way aud rOad-bed IN the state OF
California al S293, 500 The entire length OF malu
track of railwa OF said company IN said State Is y
miles, The length of main track Of said railway IN
the county Of Sacramento is 10 miles.
The assessed value per mile OF length Of said main
track of said railway, as fixed by pro rata DIS
tribution of the assessed value OF the whole prop
ertv of said company in Sacramento county, is us
follows:
OF franchise per mile, $500. OF roadway, road
bed aud rails per mile, 80 900.
The apportonment of the assessment Of SAID
property by the Board, for and TO Sacramento
county, is as follows
Franchise, assessed value, sl1, tax, S14S 20.
Roadway road-bed and rails assessed value, SlSo,
100 tax, 81, 4l5 80.
WARREN DUTTON, Chairman,
d. N. kENFIELD,
JAS. l. KING,
T. D. HEISKELL
NJ NJ. DREW,
State Board of Equalization.
L. ". MAsLE, Clerk.
Against SAID franchise, State AMI county tax,
Sl4S % costs, 81 81.