, 1881-03-29
The V|ADUCT QUESTION.
Interviews with City Officials on the
Supreme Court Decision.
As the Damages, Cannot BE Asccrtaincd,
No yiudaets viii lie Built.
a Motion for Reheariug to Bo Made on
Behalf Of the City,

p.h.1e - 49, ~.
Behalf OF the Uity,
,n ,.-.... ,,, 49,,
THE Tn1htSE "i saturday pmbllshc" tle
opinion If tho Supreme Court deciding ava!'st
n'taxo, s % u, 'ne m.cy M M ,esp"'s,",e
pcu. from tho CIrcnt Court originally, tho rfty
Is held liable nut only r"r phy:1ca aa'naFes hut
ipr constructive dnii'apea. "hu onens III hsenao
Of pr'f"te expenditure for tho etty which, r
hAyr y" l''nt. md 'nlkht prevent in thu future
The cm.ncil would mt know how urcat
Or small MI appropriation slpnld he
@ "s ,~ %" ,r tue S"1sF .' r. . msr"rt,1s would
""t Nho" "''ere 10 sup III tnor eH''nal"s ~
present. when thl''act Is scon*trnctc''. tho ely
nS ,hn unnrm"h,... m ~ 10 rr.,nr,, t,,r, in tn
Tho "r rn",o ,yas M m las With cn,,,ueIIc
t1fs,eut hotity coancil Inns nlsays appropriated
mnicy Tar THU pnrpnsc rs n ,lustcr Of equity.
1Jerrlnforo tho Supreme Court In, uuyrr nj
,,,r, r,.r ,',,,,,r',u,,,'. ',,'., ,,, "u' ~ a.,
lowed lof e"nsr"silsn da'hakes, A't nus III
ways considered public improvements III
rather hr:ltl manner. It ills rDw Ulls.ilnl wide
TIM ,ltsr FIR luws,,Ils. If tbts ,,pc1sn ts s,,s-
t,,H I'm III, i,,nr, hn,1". ",rh, rt,,nt ~
s'." , ~ '"o ,, ," H' ~ A., a ~ -" -
.' WIZ ~. III III nu, ~, n,,rnu' nv rnia
is putting il very tht,ud-to brnli.
it. rue, rur 1ho vutl Of it,y ronm,ntty. "Gnter
ihis ruling, sd ii nfo'nI,ient awyesto a rnt1.
.nilc.aw,y from ~ tnl;rovcncut no rT!xh. elaim
IN E;,,,c County rs here an uot s gsssi en,Wl,
ia%ssr To- ".rs ,;. w,tl VI ,he Court 1esSr ' ,mt II
prrcp,Dt,t 'Tnr Sltt,ruuyv Ct,,1rt jlrs xl,m GHGk
on alt Its farmer dectsit'ss n .!ss litlnscy
there wus cn.lsu fur damages. Tho
LII Suile street tunnel wus Gut thruifg,
riuht IN frt,ut nj tim urut,crtv nuf,i,,l.
There was wnil with rs.ilIllgs put right nlong
the street 80 he couIl,'t cross Nut the Supreme
Gnurt lteiurt t1llt hit WNs entitled ~ fU1fIIig.
Now, in ths LIIxney casc, tho prnrersy Is ,,ut
nenr tho ymdurt lit alt. II Is :.u feet west. |
eis ssy ffr i vii s sea R0r rhsso
were thr.e l.sssn.!nK opinons" . .
tnlk with CnrpurNtlon-CUu;lsel .tt!alny IN tho
subject. hIs he satd: II am mt III tho hntit Ut
trS'nR t''s S"srs ~ tue ie"aiMpcrS. u Wol'lts
ID !h's ~ aattsr: ii & n,n - "so " = tho ce''nss
sSS WITT @ ;sss II Prs%ss II @ 5ei e 10 Il, TIs
a"nG ,, pel"re' aiu resulted to INC injury of tho
e'!yi int c,n.t vct xoncthno fror vo II, RI.
vara 70 tho effect y tno '!ye's.",a
lnvni IL iookcd @ "vcr 7. .,o upln!o', M i caref,y f
% %sao!sh y yGt to- ean!ps,tenily M e, crltclss % T. The
S'Fue'Io" u ~"
HI. pr,rrr,y m was NOR mnre ] tl,"n so feet uwny"
Where lics Tim rln iur l1l,,1tnus c,i,,c }t, q'+
NJ don't knew whcrc the tlnsiitKe cs,ll,ns In. 1
su,,tu4 tlt u claims Tint tho property w,ly not
US il w,,s bcture tic vluiiet wis Dtslt."
Have tlloru bru,l nily suits ur tuls tnturo bp-
fore3'
Yes, air. lnis Of thpm,"
"Cnses sitinr 10 tals ll,ayc ic.u carried TO tho
Supreme GOllrt aud t!pcitlgtl tho other wuy i,1
NII,nsrg tlsn wns mt sn t,lt,h mt rf lin ,ruv
il wms i cnsc w,,crr tilu j,n Suitu strcct E,tn.3i
waa butlt rJght in Front OF fho nrn,nlsaa. :rney
.trcitru ils,st him, anu tho city huU blocKrI
tic street SO Tint iie cuultnt got acrUss. Iicra
fi,Srr ,y,,s nnnnr.nt ,Jt1um,rn e A'-'o
VII! t s,np tho a.ng nf ylaductsr'
,,, tne yGeL @ W. Mii' t, w shnPH tnat - Mayoouy ts
viii t,,v.. ~ mn" ~ os II ts rns,,nsIhIa '"o e's