, 1881-02-24

from m Ibis h' own W. knoTicdso whether tho inspection
ws so 81 nc not, na 1.o a'' 'o' appeals an"
,,.. ,,xo. y, C. W. nrAeKMAS 1scr.I H. ,,.,,.
received erntn on consignment. TIC inspection
,vas not regular and ns reosnnab1y uniform os It
should be. i1o thought TINT Tho grades vero
Rfaahaily aavnncch TINS woild throw somo
No. 9rain into lower grades. 1Io mover met
az ar ,hs ,pnch OF 'no ""'en0o'0
cros.,oxamtncd. uo a,vors h,a n,. want,
Hossss"insa; u. a rug o a'wass an o's wam.s
\. sEcKrf.
was sworn: , 1lo VA, sraln receiver u Chicago.
mid had boon In tho gratn tradc for twc'vo
years. Th" grain Inspection iii chicago was
M. n n rnnthor fn.pnr,pr ,n,n,. th.,,, r., nm.
1,hon ,a.s ~ az. ,,,., s.. ...n.. hn",, - ...,
,,o.,a,, p',v v,,oss ~ sn, .. mr a", ~,
ro"tu' senns" '''o t''oo VI ~. " '1o
re!nspso.lon wan cni.cd, und tho srado
wds not changed. Tho AppcniA Commit
tee would not raiso It: Tho car was
tno inspection i1aok. Ihfco aays Iatef Mr.
acwn ha fSseS a naSss Ssf I
or inspecting Krai,'' r.. . .,, t,,,u. ~
ross's1amlnod: l!o tvna good 1adEc 0l
kSt AhoFEpksN4A NIHCo III Nuik"6N h$t+AHto
cynus II. ADAMS
was tho next + x!tne.s svora: iio was u tho 70
1rm,n .tanG ~ @; GeaXo H. y % u @ us
rnn n",HHn ~ t IL trrn.,,,lar,t H. I"s 3.
s1nalyhe wst ,2 tug r,iraa 'rufks but ,G
nrs. NY siandin,s nrirr frmn n Min.
esa ncsota 1"a shipper ""Is t, ren ren1 nE srain
inspcatnnr Il, ChI.nuo Thu staIlIari In Miiwan-
kce aslu Ehicngo not liked to mathematical
certnsnty. Minnesota shippers are not satisfied
sells for IL ents n,nro thnn M. . n Chicago. md
the grain ought to Crude No III ChiraRo. The
Knlli in pricn mnro fi,An entnpensats!a, for tlo
IT ", wAs ~ a LOSS p 70 T,fE s,t,prEns.
IT, f51aS eFa ress s wd i. T. s1 as1c 70 Jsc xsS
ss ss ss @ e en- @ s n
;l IT. not nS 1tly y, aeter,nGa Sme o
tt o. one Wn9ss said be @ conunt o
axainss @ pni tno nurt'asto III hoa luz !ast fa1 sr
an no 'n wn % hy ~ IL nts,s ~ ~ WHIT N W.
@ nrss w was nrnnnrinp hIs ..,mnInInt thu rar1,a
peope @ C eatne ns IL aiii M settled. WIS catn Of
sf'MhR w. nr VI .no nw " nn1i"ss
,s'ns .,S t0 n,,r ~ t,,s ~ .co NJ H.
itnHno'as ,,,t u '''"es ~ 'oo ''''
COULD NOT FIND 1I1M. ..
Tho car had l,eqrl moved abuilt 80 tho Appeal
Committee colsIl not tIutl it. Tho prlnclpnl
complaint to he found nHAnst tho grain 1nspec-
ton Is In tho fact shat Mr. Reynolds Is nut III bis
office, hui attends t, uti,er business. Mr. NIp-
l"y, or tho nurllnXton itonG ctnlmch oenntrago
on tho eara. Tic Appeal CutnIn!tteo SAID thoy
con!n 1ut lind tho car N INC Snrn
hetuolds chilled tho attentlon OF tno
| rhllroHd ponplo 70 tho tacL thAt
| thf appeal W!ls NOT chtefeti upon tno proper
| book III the Inspection olfcc, aflu Muac tnht
rt'nt A9Ianst WliHes5; ~ or9GF ~ 4Nulu W.
ptt1sahthess Us alr. At!e3 eain. WituGss nCceHt~
81 b9 Y s"t.sthetiu't. ING cs'nissnt T. tnat Ms,
Reynolds does nut httenm 10 mls duties. te 10
competent ana worthy. Tho o1ce NEEDS tne o..
so|,tto 3ttcntlon u tnan WIN Is wei! aunlltied
"a Ill! tne pnEG. to8uu WE nuvef M Hpptooacncu o M
| W Wlineas VIII anapintnt nnt WIN. Mn T. f.. =
cclvet! 9ttuntson. Mlti'css never presented tho
oolnplafnt in writing to ho9nG, though NJ, ~
o ,y,taas ~ nrcrc,,t In uIn ~ Sm II"
| scented onxo,;s 10 prosec.lio it. Witness felt
tbut tho rf1,] was III iNlllt I}0xlIo felt the same
| why and tne Cunnnny
! ,,tnr,,,,,r .,,,,,rr,.r .r.,r ,,.,,rr .v.s
| VIRTUALLY ApM4. % tnn t"1 H]>ooA "tA'
IAElks'
| The Railroad Company pnth back half tho de-
| tnurrAge charged. 1t IL true that tho lnapec-
ton department has provided L bnuk ttl which
to Kfsc tMtiuc nf nppeul. hut 1t Is mt used halt
| ot Thu time Tho burdcn Ut tho Gt,lnpluist ut
the grnin trnde Ia, TINT tho Inspection t}cpart-