, 1881-10-01
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT.

tof!Al JuFeulouO0 OF Jutft0c9 must 10
uniform. unlfnru!ty in a constitutional sonso
means tho districts as then existing or thRt
might be hereafter provided Under tho Constt.
tutlOn whom tho Constitution was nHopscd. Tho
territorial Jurisdiction Of Justices has bpeu CO.
extensive With other cUuntes. and hAs been
since tho government was organized. Therefore
tho Court hollis that. when tho act provides that
Nil tho other counties snnll soversIly constitute
districts, nnd that Cook Couaty shntl be divided.
It Is to nil intcnts and purposes iucul
and special law, as 1t operites alone on
Cook County. The Court h1ds nothing aorlous
1T the effects uf this particular provision,
hut evidently teArs tho results that might fol-
low II tho tlnors irc onco opened to nn7 kind Ut
spoclal legislation. atld CONCLUDES as follows:
"1f by q strained construction this provision
might be sustained, still 1t would bo against the
intention Of tho frnners Of tho Constitution.
This would be the opening through which NIL
kinds Ut special legislation would How
Tho following Supreme Court opinions wero
sllcd in tho office Of tho Clerk to-day:
No. ]. .FttzRera!d IS. Ftzgcrald: error 10 San
XltnOn: rtfHrsGu Ind reminded
no. =, uo0dell rs. Dewey; error to Fulton:
M. i navis ~. American and Foreign Chris.
tlan Union; error to Mclean; affirmed.
million: nf!rtned
NJ" IL sny rf 9t o r. Geout ct nj" error to
Ny. L.. County OF Champaign vs.. Heed; error
t9 T., Ghan'pnlsn; H 1!!n - rcycrssd xna temandgd:
c2nk: reversed NJ to Yeaton: rs to others
i,o. II. Rcynoid. vs.. Moaturrny ct al: error to
tIons.
ID X; ' husan ase ss 81 vs. Higgins ct al;
AppelItc Court; n1trmrl. 49,.
peiIate Court; affirmed,
M. %. Knlienbaeh jr. 81. Wilson; nppcai from
AgpsatiS 8 cSarf %,a a1'rmo9 q: .,, =,
Logan: affirmed: Scott, j., ulssrits.
No. H. u. Devlne vs. The People: error to Dc
10. Vi. UpdiEo VS. IS. T1mpIins ct al; appeal
Si M. e tSf Gity Of Waveris ya. State Auditor; m.
peul fran s,nRamon: aillrnIc,i. "'
s:: No x ;oxsfsSa wf,Sat ct al vs. Guy ct all error to
M. ri HuhHrls rs, THO People: error 10 Az.
pcj,ate Court; ullIru,ed,
Cn,,r,: u.iisined oA"'o' ''''' ;" ''ppe''"''
No. TO- hutchinson ct al. vs.. Grain ct al: error
e. fosesrT ys afea Ran: oppcsl ,,om An.
pel!.tst q c1,st: affirmed; ,.~o
psrt. rsfe'sea a'' 'e''"''oa sno'ne'o' d. 'ook no
10. n. Stevens VI. Pratt ct a,; appenl from
cR Waaa "SkeE St inonsn' nj ssot, snD,s, ,rom
Cook: affirmed; Walker itd sholdan. j., Jis. W
fr.'m Mn1 "an. T"versr.t nn,i r",n. .naaH "ppea'
M, IL. Dskerspn "a Merri,unn. snne.t trom
", " rat,,fr' u. II 10 t.urr,s. o., ,.o
Annnl;.,n tsn'rt. "n,r,nsI ''"1''s' apPea' At"a'
y" - ,H"Eson T"niS., p.,,,on,ar, ,,,a,,
ss,r srnntst" T'I,r1. 1,sn,,a1. Wt;.n' gppE p;n'
sant. -''Pe'so e'A's' "''''''o' ""'A''' ''t os"
sS'a iorss: s''s'''si; -. D',.'..a ,,' - "' "eps"
to III Tkc. iat1es arned OF a w. 'afVo' ct o error
So: 81. Mo!foe W. van Meier; appeal from
e9es: H'Hrae.. ..t', -, o,,.
uon lof lhanuathns aWaeuGa.
=, ~ csea iftss'l me Appe!!ate Court are from
tho .Ihlra lHstri1t except JAcksdn County ~.
Aentll0n'all. WHICH "a iEo!n tho Euurth District.
tcopse eX eei. Illinois h!'a!ana l!a!!roaA coit-
pAhy W. Stticrior altas; writ ol inandaans
awarded; SGutt. j.. dissenting.