The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1881-06-09
Austin

|
Long & Reese VS. Ennis; from Bell
Reversed and remanded.
Lenoir Sc Lenoir VS. Dibrell &. Hodges; from
Dallas. Reversed and remanded.
Carpenter VS. Knapp Stoskee & Co; from
Limestone. Reversed and iemanded.
Montgomery VS. Brown ct al; from Hays.
Affirmed.
Embree g. Keys VS. Strickland; from Bill
Affirmed.
Bowles vs. Glss:cock, from Hill. Affirmed.
Rutherford VS. Dorcus, Ranch & Go; from
Denton. Reversed and remanded.
Eussell ct al VS. Farqusr; from Bastrop.
Reversed and remsnded.
San Antonio gas company vs. Kreberind
& Co., from Bexer. Reversed and re.
msnded.
Ryall VS. Griffin; from johnson. Affirmed
with ten per cent. damages.
l. & I'll Blum vs. Martindale & Schul'ze;
from williamson. Reversed and remanded.
EbeliDg vs. Meyel from Guadalupe
Affirmed.
Taul VS. Shanklin; from Lamar. Reversed
and remanded.
Owens VS. Prather; from McLennsn.
Affirmed.
Michael We Rossey; from Dallas. Affirmed
Hobert, executor, VS. Flint g. Chamberlain;
from Navarro. Affirmed.
Cone & Alexsnd,vs Morris, ct al; Affirmed.
McDaniels 81 Co., vs. Home Bitters Co.;
from Travis. Reversed and remsLded.
Henry VS. Mclean; from Grayson. Af-
frned.
Houston s. Texas Central railway, VS.
McGeasson; from McLennau. Dismissed.
johnson VS. Darling & Bro; from Banders.
Affirmed.
Upton vs. Mayer & Prisnall; from Bexar.
Writ of error dismissed.
Bybee IS Washington; from Williamson.
Reversed and remanded.
Foreman VS. Curtin; from BRACES. Dis
missed.
The supreme court transferred the case of
A H Belo &..Co vs. Wren to Tyler.
The Houston, Texas g. Red River railway
company filed articles of incorporation to-
day in the Office of the secretary of state.
The road is to begin at Houston and run
through Liberty, Hardin. Polk, Trinity,
Houston, Leon, Freestone, Navarro, Ellis.
johnson, Tarrant, Parker, Wise, Jack,
Young Archer, Baylor, Wildberger,.. Harde
man and Green counties, to point on the
west boundry of Green county,
about 80 miles north of the south
Fork of Red river, distance of about six
million dollars. The incorporates are A. M.
Gentry, ]. A. Rec, w. D. Cleveland,
IS. X. McIlhemy, j. G. Tracy,
Robt Brewster, B. A. Bats
E. p ilot and Robert and S. M. Rushmore,
of Houston; T. S. Heddeack, of Chicago, and
G. Williams, of Now York. The working
plans of the new company will be ready by
tho 10Th of October
Tho Texas Central railway com:
pany has reported an amendment
10 the charter extending their road to The
north boundary line of the state, distance
of 1856 miles, and to construct branch
line from Whitney to tho Red
river in Bowie county, and another branch
from the centre of Hopkins county 10 the
Red River, in Lamar county. The capital
stock of the company has been increased by
one million dolsrs.
Tom Fumen, under charge of burglary in
Travis county committed in Austin last fall,
broke from his guard in the jail yard on
Saturday evening, jumped the fence and
escaped.
On Sunday evening q man named Glen
Davis shot and, it is feared, fatally wounded
his brother-in-law, Mr.. Matum, with bird
shot, for the alleged abuse of
his (Davi,O wife's sister. I'm
medately after committing the deed
Davis left the locality and has not yet been
heard from. No complaint has so far been
made. An officer has been sent sout TO
investigate.
Austin, June 7.-School directors claims
will be resdy for payment BY Friday.
The scholastic census, so far as returns
have been made. show a very small increase
over last year.
The state grand body of colored Masons
met here to-day.
The sdjutant general to-day received let
ter from Texas Pacific contractor forty mile
west Of the present terminus of lie road, ask
ing for y company Of state troops TO protect
the construction hands sgsinst from one 10
Two hundred roughs in that part Of the
country and following up the extension O.
the road. He will send Cspttin Msrsh's
company 70 the disturbed districts.
Supreme court decisions delivered to-day /:
Burns vs Rucker; from Smith. Affirmed.
GH&S A Ry 20 vs. Mccoy; from Csld-
we'll. Dismissed.
Goraen vs. Terrel; Guadalupe. Affirmed
BY agreement
Nash & McDonsld vs. Taylor; Bsstro p.
Stricken from The docket.
Mssierson vs. Brown; dismissed by sgree-
ment
The reports Of commisaoneIs Of appeals
we're sdopied in the following cases: GillAnd
" storey; Bsxsr. Affirmed.
johnson vs. Hsmiltou; johnson. Reversed
and remsnded-
Lsng5on vs. McCsudlesE; from Navarro
Reversed and remanded-
Daily " Killsbrsv; from Fslls- Affirmed.
Gordon " Terrell; .frsm Guadalupe.
Affirmed.
smith and wife vs city Of Dallas. Az
irmsd.
H&TC RCo W Ssmusls ard StOnsr;
from Collins Reversed and rsmanded-
Brighton vs Bailey; from Collin
Affirmed.
Dsvisson u Aren't; from NsvErro.
Affirmed.