New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1881-11-06

rr,c dutv ppon an officer the law which called this aS
thoy into being bestowed upon on T be binding every
Where This Information did not deal Win any my
acts of the officer; it dealt alone c, Meh the
rosnlta of the action of that ohleeI. .h
sS,ne here alleged was limited purely to me
condition OF mind Of the person ALLEGED 10 nav
sSod not have alleged that Mr. Brady abused he ais
erection they should have set cut aTorzed by
law and them having laid the foundatlo' sH rd tpet
built legal intent upon RGdT had done good
was authorized by lawtne prosecution couu TO- ON NJ
for alleged bad faith alone ConetGTs C rou mo- an
torty to review his action II Mr Brady couiu DC @
here and held to explain eve,ytT nIison 'I" then
Of course, the PostnasterGeneral could aiso DC 20
Brought in and he compelled TO give an rndv had
done deed inherently wrong by virtue OF hnuils ~ n
III the possession of the power OF the conid
eral The defence held tAat an executive ohIoi nan
not be subjected to the Jurisdiction Of the Court o
abuse Of discretion given him by WaTe and Bishop
from which authorities they quoted al ehs'"'
PROFESSIONAL AMENITIES.
He condemned in strong terms the attempts Whch
had been made By the Government 10 pihSt INC ~
tation of the accused before giving them nearing.
fore the case had crossed the threshold of the Court Nc
fore the information had been placed upon the Mes an
immersion and belief in the mfamY OF the defendants
hoa been spread throughout the land He anegeI III
the course OF his further remarks Ihal tne a. bod
had been given to the Assoe'"'c" ileSS
been filed in Court. 49,, -, -, ,.,ot no char
Mr. interrupted with q denial OF WHAT ny 'i',i
acterized IA papabc and uDfounded nllhsta @
OF fact" IL was not that the Information nu uec
given TO anyone or had been published III the papers
until il had been Tiled. 49,. A.. .,n.,o,,o, ~
thai information was not telegraphcd 10 NOV" YIN NV
night before 1t vas tledl go . . o,
Mr.. CookI 20 assert, nor was II KNOWN 10 any ihem
Der Of the press that " was to be hled. . -, -
Mr. Chaadler-A very reputable gentleman ton me
that ne read ii In "a NewYork paper the morning IL was
Mr.. Cook-The gentleman must have got his iniorina-
ton from the father OF lies. laushter,I ,.,,. H.
Mr. Chamberlain he may be OF close kindred 70 tuc
prosecution for all know. laughter wiz not IN
derake to search out his parenage BUT II dIi'th 10
look for &C. know the first place 10 winch Woud 20.
Mr. Couk-1hat would only be the gentlenahb secohu
error and second reinstatement OF IGcts
Mr. Chandler-If the gentleman denies that II was so
| Will accept the denial and say / was mistaken
Not one opportunity have these men had 10 SPEAK
in their behalf not a single syllable OF testimony mas
dropped from any living witness against tneI Dt 30
has tie Government OF the United states manipulated
these facts their disadvantage that the cloud OF IN
fanny upon their names, il Is said in every district
of tine United States | say that for that alone TINS
Court onght to exercise it's discretion IN e%Pehhg from
its records this polluted thing. II pears
no sembiance OF Justice, II is iucar-
nate iniquity in every expression; anu Il
Government which has no more appreciation OF CT
liens rights than Its annihilavc authority 10 Ge
Sfroy reputation before charge Is made, ought 10 NC
held to come into court IN the usual way.
Mr. Chandler spOSc for an hour and three quarieII
ana at the conclusion Of his argument The court az 40
adjourned Till Monday when Mr. Cook VIII argue IN on
position To the motion to set aside the information