National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1881-02-03
DISTRICT COURTS

SCPR,.IE COURT OF THE DIsTRICT-CHIEF Jrs-
TIcECARTTER ANDJUSTICES WHLIEAND HAGNER.-
6IOSon vs. tiauer: on hearing.
CIRCUIT COCRT-JUsTICE NAcA RTI4UR.-Ward vs.
Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company; verdict
by default. Knotzer vs. Frederick Judgment 6v de-
taut. HaIlsell vs. Reh; judgment by default Ellison
keyser; Judgment 6y defanIt Watson executor VS.
Maiiln; verdict for plaintiff for So Massman & Co.
w. Hynne: judgment set aside. Brady VS.. Tegeler:
verdict for the defendant. Franklin et al. VS.. Sprague
hulcken from The calendar Pearls executors Car
Paige same action. Lewis trustee vs. Jefires; same
%Cu9l' Lewis, trustee. Us. Edmunds; same action
Lewis trustee. VS.. Hayden: same action. Lewis
unStee IS hIcwell same action. Neale VS.. Bender;
i,iao. bliihneI d o. use, &C. vs. FREDERICK
iiM.lSiieit ny default District Of Columbia, use of
Davis vs.. Hill: on hearing.
Equity CoTIRT-JCSTICEC oN.-Brown, administra-
Burgess vs.. Williams: pro coniesso against NJ s VII
l+!lS ADMINISTRATIVE. Coughlin vs. COughlin: testi
nlveE: Ladd Mangum: auditors report con
lHlned Parker We. Parker: testimony ordered 70 be
GIG Fl al; appearance OF absent defendants ordered
2nley vs. Adams: payment Of rent 10 solicitor of
error allowed 90 he filed. and making a. II. Bradley
defendant. King rs. Bnlkley; commission 10 take
sale ordered and Il. H. Godsburougl and J. NJ. John
sion appointed trustees. Jackson Gales sale Or
deTed Thompson vs. Poulson; dismissal of bill or
Gered.
PROBATE CouRF-BEFoRE REGISTER WEBSTER
HE administrator with will annexed. fixing March II
joF final settlement of the estate IN Henry Me
IHtlre; final notice issued 10 The administrators, fix
ing March il for the tina! settlement of the estate
CRIMINAL CoURT-IUSTICE JAHES.-Jehn s. n.
johnson. murder Of James l. Johnson: trial post
poied until to-day on account OF d sick juror.
ASSIGNMENTS For TODAY.
supreme Court Of the DistFict-CheEJ Justice Cartier
and Justices Wyiie and HagHeT-No -, District OF
Columbia vs. johnson: No. .. Beverly vs. Roberts;
No g. Quinn vs.. District of Columbia; No. y. Lewis
States vs. Brown; No. 81 Gibson VS.. Gauiier No S.
FGx rs: Davidson: No. 81, Simmons IS. Douglass
Circuit COurt-JUstice MacATthur-A ppeal Calen-
n;'i-No &c, District of Columbia. of Walter,
ltellt and CDllinane Regular caleDdaT-So. , Joliffe
vs. Clarke d. Cooley No. 3. LaIlgdoD vs.. Evans:
40 j, CTlppS examiner Douglass Brothers: No. z,
olllg VS.. District of Columbia: No. s. RittenhouSe
StlGSe; No Is, Kilbourn & Latta Willard No Is.
flSLer Us: Pullman Car Company; No. 10. Hamilton
vs. hirk; No. -, Nottingham KS. Baltimore and Poto-
mac Railroad Company: No. c6. Browning vs.. Dis
Mcl 81 Columbian No. q, United States Lee ct 81.
NJ" =, United States Briant and Craig: No %,
iFmp vs.. Chronicle Publishing Company: No. 80,
iqelI vs. SiSSOI; Nc. 81 Strong District of CO.
i9nloLa; No. 3. United States BedTick al: No
-: MURPHY vs.. Hewitt: No. 3i. Rey and Whitney
11iislF!Ct OF Columbia; No. s. Bell Baltimore and
VIio Railroad Company.
Q iquny CoHTt-Justice CoS.-So. L. Flanagan vs.
TTiioN; No. 20, Hurley Davis; No. -. Browne vs.
6Towne: No. %, Dawson Jones: No. "a COnscr vs.
81 2i9Nh and Bradford Brown, administrative: No
n, oeIdner vs. kaufman: No IS, Jones Warden;
NJ - Sollls vs. Martin; No. 3d. Eler Heaney;
No 81, Bean vs.. Croft
1ilinnal CoErt-JuSiice James.-John = ". job H.
S0i'' murder Of James i. johnson.