National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1881-05-03
limited STATES SUPREME COURT.

limited STATES SUPREME COURT.
On motion of Hon. F. NJ. Cocllrell. Jacob A. VrOO
,,,sm ,.-J of -. Louis No. was admitted 10 prac-
en- motion Of Hon. B. II. Hin, William Edgar
7,-.rs esq of Jersey CITY, y. j.. was admitted 10
ri,'.sHT;; Tho ITop,ius & Dickinson Manufacturing
,,T,rsirrv appellant p. and F. Corbin ct al APP
}Ir,5 ;hr tfr,u Court of the United States for the
If-rri nl Connecticut. Decree affirmed, Win costs.
iir;,,:nr, Iy Mr. Justice Woods.
H. - Nelson Wall taller ct al, plaintiffs in error
5 c s Egi'' OF Rhode Island Judgment az
frlarl. with costs Opinion by MI Jnsuce WOODS
\, 81 William +. Clark, appellant, vs.. John
G,r.c Kiliian, administrator &c, et al Appeal from
t.-ulrpIne Court of the District of Columbia Decree
a0i,,TtJ with costs but without prejudice 20 any
lr uf ppellees 10 perfect their appeal. Opinion by
u - The Town of Thompson plaintiff i'm error.
" Orlando Perrine In error 10 the Circuit Court OF
tire Hiied STATES for the Southern District o. New
urk. Judgment affirmed. with costs and interest.
opinion 10y AIr. Justice Harlan.
No $50 George Baty Blake ct all executors, &c.
,l,irItffs in error vs. John w. McEim judge, DC. In
error To the Circuit Coart ofthe United Staestor the
District of Massachusetts,. Judgment affirmed, with
costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice Harlan.
Nu. So William Neal, plaintiff III error, VS.. The
State Delaware. In error TO the Court of Oyer and
T"Gmimer OF New Castle County of the State of Della
ware Judgment reversed. with costs, and cause
andcd with directions 10 set aside the Judgment and
verdict. well the order denying the motions to
such proceedings, upon a further hearing OF those
motions as may be consistent with the principles of
the opinion OfthS court Opinion by Mr.. Justice IIar
Ian. Dissenting, Mr. ChefJustice Waite and Mr..
No 5I7. William S. HOyt, appellant. rs. Am4sa
SIrayue ct al. Appeal from the Circut Court of the
United States for the District of Rhode Island. De
affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dir. Justice
Bradley.
AmaSa Sprague ct al. Appeal from The Circuit Court
ofthe United States for the District of Rhode Island.
Decree affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice
Bradley. - ,,---
plaintiff III error, vs. EDISON & Bangs by ms guardian
a liiem CIISIm2n h. Davis. In 10 the Circuit
Court the United States for the District of Mime
spta Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest.
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Field:
No GI3. The New York Life Insurance Company
appellant. vs. Edison c: Bangs; by his guardian ad
Item. CUSilnlaG X. Davis, and Eliza {. Bangs APP
Ue. from The Circuit Court of the United States for
the District Of VI minnesota; Decree affirmed, with costs
Opinion. by Mr.. Justice Field.
No.2.3. The -. Joseph and Denver City Railroad
Company plaintiff IN error, V. Matthew BIidTIn
In error 10 the Supreme Court of the State of Ne
r,nded. with directions for further proceedings TO
bc had therein in conformity with the opinion of this
court: opinion by Mr. Justice Field Dssenting-Mr
No. iiSf. J. T. Weber plaintiff in error vs.. The
Appeals OF The State of Virginia. Judgment reversed
With costs and cause remanded for further proceed
ion Of This court Opinion by Mr.. Justice Field.
No. 4,6 The school district No. it, of Richardson
Fire and Marine Insurance Company In error to
lie rcui Court Of the United STATES for the District
Of Nebraska. Judgment reversed with costs. and
c.,Is" rcnandcd for further proceedings 10 be had
therein inconsistent with the opinion of This
N'','ti. ''i,L..i..,,, - 'N'''4'
Va. -t6 William Adam, ct al, plaintiffs in error.
81 e. Norris ct al In error TO the Circuit Court of
the United States for the District of California Judg
memt affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice
No. : John : Williams ct al. plaintiffs in error.
The State of Louisiana ct al. IN the Sill
pTeine Court OF the State OF Louisiana. Judgment
No. 90 Harrison DurRee ct al, appellants, The
Board of Liquidation of the state OF Louisiana. APP
peal from the Circuit Court of the United States for
te District of Louisiana. Decree affirmed, with costs.
Opinion By Mr.. Justice Miller.
q TIlmllgA H. Brown 81 al aOnpllantS
john d. +. Slee et al, executors &c. Appeal from
FL" Circuit Court Of the United States for the District
OF Iowa. Decree affirmed. with costs. Opinion by
Mr.. ChietJustiCe Waite.
No. 81. James w. Schaumburg. plaintiff in error
The United States In The Circuit Court of
the United States for the Eastern District of PennsyI
yan;t. Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Mr.. Chief
No. 275. Joseph Goldfng, master, &c, appellant. vs.
The Steamship illinois, &c Appeal from the Cir
cut Court of the United States for The Eastern District
Of pcnnsylvania- Decree affirmed with costs. Opin-
No. ~ Edmund McCready, appellant. vs.. The
Union Paper-Bag Machine Company ct al. Appeal
Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Decree affirmed,
with costs and damages at the rate of ten per i'll
addition 10 interest Opinion by Mr.. ChiefJustice
No rs. TheShjp "Civilta,' &c. Casimr Casulicb,
No. III. The Steanl-tug Restless, &c. John G.
Baker claimant, appellant vs.. Augustus B. Perry ct
al. Appeals from The Circuit Court of The United
States for the Southern District of New York Decree
affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr.. ChiefJustce
No. $50 Charles H. Wright, assignee. &c. appel |
llsS stephen Ii. IOIGcI. ADppll from the
emit Court of the United States for the Southern Dis
Opinion by Mr.. ChiefJuslce Waite |
NJ" IS. 3. d. Whitney ct al, plaintiffs in error vs.
Alex II. Cook ct al. In the Circuit Conrt of
The United States for the Southern District of NSSis
sippi. Judgment affirmed. with costs. and $50 dam
IseS AGAINST John y Klein IN addition 10 interest !
No: loriginal. FIX parte-The Connecticut Mutual |
Life Insurance Company. Petition for nandamus de- |
Ordered That the fifly-seccnd rule in admiralty he
amended oy adding thereto the following paragraph
- Hereafter. in making ZIP the record to he trans
United TO the Circuit Court on appeal, the clerk OF the
ns testimony. exhibits which the parties by their
projectors shall by written stipulation agree NAV be
SH iib tG ra n ih stipulation shall be certified up
Amendment 10 Rule 5:
SECTION 6. The record iii caIsCs Of admiralty and
MARITIME jurisdiction. when. under tho requirements
Oflw, the facts have been found in the court below
and our power Ofrpvew Is limited To the determine
ton Of questions of law arising the record shall
he confined To the ptcdinsS. the findings of fact and
final Judgment or decree, and such interfocr9orv
orders and DEGREES as may be necessary to proper
No Io.5. George w Williams ct al. appellants. vs.
Calvin Clatlin It al SupeTsedeas modified so as 10
TX par te-im the matter OF William Horton ct al
petitioners. Molten for leave TO file petition for writ
OF prohibition denied.
No. 20 The BOARD of Supervisors of Wayne County
Ell al. plaintiffs in error. vs. John w Kpnnicot ct nj
Order amending judgment. Announced by Mr.. Chief
Justice Waite.
No. Gn. John German. plaintiff in error vs. The
Notion 10 reImS,ate cause denied Announced by Mr.
Chjci,JgStice Waite.
'iruer-It appearing to the conrt that a new aIo.-
mont OF the ChieSce and Associate Justices of this
Cu.r among the circuits existing by law is re-
qulrF and cxpCdien by reason of the prOTacted dis
amiy ot Mr. Justice Clifford and the resignation OF
Mir Justice Swayue now. therefore. ne IL ordered by
III" court that the following aIiGImentS be made:
FSl crcnit. Mr.. Justice Harlan: second circuit. Mr.
Justice Hunt: third circuit. Mr.. justly Bradley:
fourth circuit, Mr. ChiefJuStce Waite: fifth circuit
MI Justice Woods: sixth circuit Mr. Justice Brad
ley; seventh crcnit Mr.. Justice Harlan; eighth cir
cut. Nj Justice Miller.
No IlS9 August Beck. appellant. rs. The Odorless
I;Nca'ailnC apparatus Company; Nc 1850, John l. /
Blades ct a. appellants. vs.. The OdoreSS Eycavating
appellant, The OdOrleSS Excavatinc Apparatus /
Company; No. 1872 Francis Collins, appellant vs. !
I9le odorieSS ENcaVating Apparatus Company; No. |
Hex. Michael Bean, appellant, vs. The OdOrleSS FIX
IsiV;tiinE apparatus Company; No 1891, Leonard !
Deck. appellant, The OdOrleSs EXravatiDg Appa-
rains Company: No 1885, Daniel DaughcTty, ap- /
I niilnY; No ilA6. Henry Garrett, appellant. vs. |
I ne DdoTieSS ENcaVaiing Apparatus Company; No. /
~ Isaac C'rHmeIinEer, appellant The OdOrless
t.NtNitllhS y pi)aIGuS Company: No lbs Solomon
- Hog. appellant vs. The OdOrleSS ESCavatng APP /
I'af;iIs Connany: No IIga. James McCTacken. APP /
leIliIt vs. The OdQrle3S ENcaVatng Apparatus Conf
J ne OrdorlcSS FNcaVaIinG APR aratus Company: No /
l21. Henry Poff, appellant vs.. tie OdorleSs ENC:.-
waiting Apparatus Company No. 1@c2. John Schmidt .
~ lei5Salt Us The OdOrleSS ENcaVatIn9 apparatus /
company. Appeals from the Circuit Court of the /
lei States for The District of Maryland. On motion
OF AIR. i VI. Wilson, of counsel for the annellees
Cocketvd and dismissed with costs.
No. D. Frederick Nie,Or al al, plaintiffs in error
vs. & : Arthur, collector dc. On motion of Mr. As
TH.iii Aitnfhcy-'enefal Smith leave granted 10 file
pVtt" Tor lti airing. and stay o! mandate granted.
A't'tH red 10 Time and place appointed by Law.
DISTRICT COURTS.
C.'g'aT ~ GENERAL TERN-C HIEF-JUsTiCI: CART (