Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1880-11-10
Legislature of Vermont.

tConciHded from First Pagel
planned he iferanres and steals which to his tnowl-
edge had occurred under the present system Of
Mr.. BUTTERFIELD OF whItlngham defended the present
tiazation and liz operation would occasion great lpcon-
yenence the officials whose would have be
investigated by the state auditor.
Mr.. BRIGGS of Brandon said that the had been
ssd s S1 sgo e Th s chaes s
made by the bill and their Recommendation should have
Mr. FIFiELD Of Montpelier said that this measure had
been recommended not only by Judge veazey in the report
Of the expenses but by
IN his message These different court auditors each with
leakages or they were subject to local influences and
plants for tie same transaction and thereby charging more
costs than they ought TO- The court auditors were apt 10
for them, tn bill contained clause which prevented
such muliipcatons and stopped that leak 1t ought to
Mr. PAGE OF Rutland favored the BILL and said there had
tenn Of court auditors. lie .ketched the growth OF the
lished by legislature and said that an add
u9nal cheGR " sass en- very inpoTsn, one tho o
which the secton Of the bnD alluded to by MIR.
Mr. HTNCKLEY of Chelsea suggested some amend
ments' which would make the bin more specific as to the
Mr. PALMER of Waterbury made substantially the
sae suggestions and said that he should oppose the bill
Mr. FFIELD thought that practically the auditor
after the ending Of each county court notifying the county,
clerk and that therefore the objections Of Mr. nckey and
more convenient to have ocil auditors but th; ncon-
Of having uniform system Of allowance under state
NJ. WHITNEY of Franklin gave Illustration of the
evils of the present system.
The bill then ordered to third reading Tuesday
morning,
to the senate passed win certain proposals OF amend
Walker Of Ludlow and ora Paul Of pomiret locating
building Which The tax sd amendment EGR agreed to-
H. ~, an act in amendment OF sec A., CHAP. 81, s. s.
having been passed by the house, came from the senate
with proposal OF amendment he bill provides that in
me absence o. me constable OF The town IN justice trial
issue related TO either party within the fourth degree
able pefso IN his place The bill a. ntrodaced contane
clause which allowed The justice to appoint suitable per
opinion Of the Justice The Judiciary committee struck this
The senate restored the clause and sent the bill back to the
M.s.rs. BUTTERFIELD Of whtngham, Howe Of Lud-
low Fneld OF Montpelier and thompson Of lRsburgh,
# turned the the debate that the clause
ws % %. ISs IN 9q9T trial. so that n might
the hands Of justice and IT might be abused
The house then refused to concur In the amendment.
Senate bills releyreds IS. an act in amendment OF 10.
"a of the acts Of 1876 relating 70 appeals from justices Of the
peace to Judiciary = So an act relating To ieeinens
chap ~ ~ to Judiciary com s. s. an act to consrue an
act 10 assess and tax railroads approved Nov ~ 1876 and
S. an act In relation to designations OF judges Of the SUI
Reporis.-ffom com % judiciary by Mr.. THOMPSON.
for majority of committee adversely to H. 9l act
Howe ordered TO lie and be made the special order for
Tuesday neat. al eleven A. ".
The Rafidnd CoSnty Naiionoi Bank eiaim.-Mr HOWE
Of Ludlow called up H. ll to pay the Rutland County Ma
tonal Bank Mr. Page OF Rutland moved that 1t be ordered
to lie Mr. Howe moved to amend, by making 1t the spe-
cial order for " Wednesday next, at eleven A. NJ.
Ptdders dndducftoneers-Mr FlFlELD of Montpelier
called from the table H. i6, act to repeal chap ST.
entitled Of peders and auctoneers This bill was intro
duced by Mr. smith of Planheld reported adversely
to by the judiciary and motion of Mr.. Fihed,
ordered to lie account OF Mr. smiths absenc- when II
reportedl.
Mr. sMl III explained the purpose Of the BILL 1t seems
that the law To he repealed by the bill imposes license OF
SIS upon foot pehdlers, $50 pedders having one
horse cart and $50 pedders of iewely patent me
cnes etc. lie said that this law enforced that
the collected small amount by IT, and II
hard those who did pay the rest violate the law
with IMMUNITY.
Mr. HlNCRLEY Of Chelsea took the ground that the law
good one, aud II not enforced II ought TO be;
third reading refused
Changed reference.-Mr. ALLEN OF Hartford moved to
commit, H. W To the special H. u.s. the board OF
health bill.