National Republican., 1880-12-13
DISTRICT COURTS.

CIRCUIT Court, DIV. No. 2-JusrIcE HAGNER.-
Murray VS. District of Columbia, leave granted de-
tendant to file additional plea; Payne & Co, VS..
White, motion to set aside demurrer ovcrruled and
leave given 10 amend declaration in twenty days
Barton VS.. DriscOll motion to quash certiorari
granted; Mclean vs.. Bailey ct al, set for January
Barnes, Judgment by default; Berry Il Wager VS..
Home and Dover Association, order for security
for costs bond $50; Mende Brothers VS.; Dosch,
Judgment by default Wallingsiord VS.. Bennett,
new trial granted Portnervs. Moran, order to give
security for costs; Porncr VS.. Leonard, same order
passed.
EQUITY CoURT-JUsTICE Cox.-McIntosh vs. Cis-
sci; demurrer sustained. Alexander vs.. District
of Columbia; amendment of the fourteenth para.
defendants cnjoned from selling. Anderson vs..
Anderson; reference to the auditor. Stowcll vs..
Stowell; testimony, ordered taken before, exam
incr H. TobIincr. TuOhy VS.. Holtzman; clerk or
dercd to pay the funds out in his hands. Lewis
VS.. Kennedy commission ordered to take tcsti.
mony in New York city. Shields VS.. Driver; leave
granted to file amended bill.
CRIMINAL CorRT-JusTIcE JAMEs--IlarTy Hardy;
rape gave bail in the sum of 1909. In re Bed
son witness fees while confined in Jail overruCd.
William Pope convicted of manslaughtcr in kill
ing James i. Butler: motion for new trial over
ruled; sentenced TO the pcntentiary for six years
exceptions taken and execution of sentence sus-
pended for hearing ofthe ease in the general term.
james Stokes; mansaughtcr in killing Charles
Kane ayNlarch 10, 1879; motion for new trial
was granted.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TO-DAY.
SUPREME COURT OF THE Observation-Disclosures
TIcE CARTIER AND JusTICEWrLIE,-No. 81, Rick vs..
NeiZey; No. SS Jcatfriy VS.. Grant; No. o. Hibernia
Building Association vs.. Gibbons: No Jos, Dickson
VS.. Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company
No 100, OBrcn VS.. Baltimore and Potomac Railroad
Company; No. 1lO, Sprlngman vs., Baltimore and
Potomac Railroad Company; No Ill, West vs.. bal
timorc and Potomac Railroad Company; No. 1l2
Freedmnn's Safe and Trust Company W.. Vandcn-
burg; No. 1l3, Frccdmans Safe and Trust Company
VS.. Crawford; No, III, United States W. Brown No
1l5, National Metropolitan Bank vs. Hitz; No. ll6
Draper vs. HYDE No H. Pike & Atkinson VS.. Ed.
wards gnrnishec; No. IFS Grcacen vs. Edwards gar
nishee; No. 1l0, Copeland ct al. vs. Edwards gurni
shee No. 100 Copeland ct nl VS.. Edwards garnishee
No 10, Bridget vs. Cornish No. u, Bliss vs. Tucker
CIRCUIT COURT DIV. No. l--JrsrICE MACAnTHuR
No 2S3, National Metropolitan Bank vs. Gleason el
al. No, 400, Nnndcr vs.. Obcrhcim; No. iSl, O'Neil
VS.. Rollins; No 4S9 Curtin VS.. Douglass No. 40
wick vs.. sheriff. No. 3S9 Phelps VS.. Tolman No
400, Tolmnn ". Phelps No. i0! saks & Cows. Sol
onion No. 603 Pomcroy VS.. Walsh No. j05. Ma.
tional Metropolitan Bank VS. Smith; No. 800 Shep.
herd vs. Taylor No 81, United States vs. Sterling
ct al; No. tl1E, Little W, Lloyd ct al,
CIRCUIT COURT DIV. No. 2--JusTfCE HAGNER-
No. 2OS, Washington Market Company VS.. WOrlhen
Bro; No, .0l, johnson w. Potomac Ferry Com.
pany No. 2l5 Neil VS.. Ilcurlch; No. 2lG, Colman
US. licurich; No. dOG, Bailey VS., District of Co
! lunbu.
EQuiTY CouHT-JusTIcE Cox--No ., Narr vs.
Brown; No. D, Moore VS.. District Of Columbia; No
4, Kelly VS.. stuart; No G, Gait VS. Gleason; No. s.
Mernen ys; Barrett No ., Mecauley vs.. knights
Council VS. DOwdcni No, H. Grant vs. Frccdmnn's
| Savings and Trust Company; No. Is, Reed vs.. Ran
dali; No, ID, Forsyth vs. Hlbenia Building Asso
! citation
! ,CIuMIHAI CouRr-JusTIcR JAMEs.-Henry TEN
pie, assault with intent to kill; Thomas Anderson
forgery Israel Buchanan, assault with intent Il
kill; Monifou &. Rcndcll. assault; IsaaC smith
rape, dwo cases0 George W. Black, assault.