The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1880-09-18

VOL. XW.-NO. A.

and say that the Returning Board and It's
findings Z conclusive upon us, and wecan-
not Investigate At all. I-would not do it
for q Thousand years Of tenure ia tho great
Office for which he is candidate. Ap-
plause.l | state to you that whatever the
truth might be abont the De Golyer pave
nnent, whether he iidt6ke d fee againsttle
interest Of tho Government when be was
Representative takiugasalary, whatever the
facts might be about tho Credit Mobilier,
whether it was terrible frand or not, will
not stop to speak Of that until this greater
question Is settled, Whether as repre-
sentative Of the people, as q juror sitting
between myself and Wheeler aud Tilden
and Hayes, be was a true man or a false
man. [Applausel If I have case in
your court and you are called upon as a
juror, and no questions are asked YOU at
all, aud you have bitter prejudice against
ame and a Judgment against me, would YOU
60 and take your seat2 My oath would
not allow me to do il, and | know that
yours would not. Yet Garfield. after he
had helped to make up the case down al
New Orleans, comes 10 Washington, and
without protest or apology orcxcnse, takes
bis seat, sand he votes day after day
contrary 70 what he said in the House
was the law, No gentlemen, he viii ney-
er be President OF the United States.
hof ability an5 r. n,oro dh;li,r - " : nan
posseesas tbo 49, : y e. ~ 1SE esss. "'ar
aon't Want Nm ~ haoa,'so ~ ~ TA,se.
I presidon, q IVasIs;a..
noiit;cs ,n,g IA - g. 1Ss.sSsoi i.ta' ~
.ss mneb Nv p.as;Ia~. !. ~. s,. se"s ~ ~ =
mpch ,vo,,rs a. a,a 80 a - yI..e, 4Se e
iden, IL 4 fraa r,o,, 49, si.s =
nassions which nsrrar, Jss ~ ;,' sis1s. an1
destrov onin;on Snnia,.ss NJ NJ ~an
tlemeg I have occnn,sd Is vca, -v~,ssn, s.,a,ssas
ienger to.n;,h, than i s,nasssd y~i - sIs..n NJ.
win reneot' t,st ,shar 7 80 -. s,"
FAST his morn;no I had ~ ,ho,'.S, SeA sssS
dressino Won. Il was not nsr, oe q Il. A.
/. proeramme IL tbe business &c IN Az a. w y
all When saw Thar tba Lo,,rarJ s.;S
. thht IL T did M, l,cnako .h;s aaad -.
disgraeod. and II T d;d .bsn Esrs,ls -. -
dissraeed-then osn,lemen ~ a. saon ,,'',- ~ s-1
Z saw that, | lopqed 70 see Won and snssL + - !
: YOU with more earnastness and faai;n., ,I,.,
q aver longe5 10 al betaro Tr ? -.
q failed in anS ons ~ ths ouss,;ons ,r.s.n, 80
ed hv the .i,,,,,ol knor !, ~. 'is.s -.
a apnealed 10 no witnesses axoar. ca.s;a,S
v i himself and bv Garfield i Gsresld ssis ~
l. nigbt d;soracsd rAn,I.nso W., e.
10 minded Remublieans yo,, ven,Ianer sha,
d love YOUR country better than Won 40 shs
re Journal. better than Won love csrt;slS siiI
, better than you lave combina,;ors oe rar'
al ty, / appeal 10 Won now bv ,h;s test Il NH Nh
H. liely, | have said that II t6e shorthand "a.
4 porter Il not here for the .Jovy,oI bav,
he a report Of INV sueeoh to.night ana vii
be furnish il to The .Jownol a1d Al tbst /,
20 appear. and Il II does not ,nnoar ~. roorro,.
Of morning then II 4 admitted rs ,bouah \
Id was written in the broadest and br;r5tss
on capitals, awe can't stand unon The ;ssne
w, that we made Yesterday morning y TAr
ed plause.1 If they do5,t nnbl;sb What
nd have said 10 Won fo.n;gbt M IN .nv ;nro
to room. but IN this temnle then Won ma,
ur- know that thew admit that Thomas A
Iay Hendricks Is not disgraced hut that Jame
ia A. Garfield is disgrsced 'rAnrl,,so1
md THE IonnNAr's nrpFy
acc The Ipdianapolis .Jouyaal of the follou
red inc morning oave na renort of ,be snasoI
ow and made no editorial comment unan |;
lb- In brief account Of the meetipg tbe q
yes lowing was all that was nripted conearn; =
rty GOV Hendricks.
he The Wiewam was about four. .6f,bs slla
" last evening. The prorramme beipo sneecI
ed es from Thomas ( Henar;cts sopvsn;
rs, of 1876. ana j " shaw coloreJ ma
cn and brother Of New Yerk c;tv tn eon,
ed. tesies usually extended to visiting or.,o,
st were reversed. the colored man inc +;
to seat. Mr., Hendricks sneaLinc 6yst
ak yengeful FIRE cleaned Il M Hendr;cks :
10 eountenanee md III bosom baavsd as
to freicbted with ,ave Witb essr1r;.;n,
We wrath he pavo tho audience ~ ,,naars,.n !,
,rs that the cause of his indjgpat;on wss !, j,
be editorial nublisbed IN tho .Iournol of IN. 4
on morning. the article be;no an,;tlad ul
as Point of yeraoity. which ray;ewea a.,
IL tain labruace IL ii, Marinn sneech All,
MS cred at tho opening Of the eamna;gn s,,o can
is cernipg Gan. (,arGeld h which M H.
ut drieks had made n snecifc cb.,-o 80 30.
III ruption against Gen Garfield Il Inn reesio,
is with matfers concerning ,bs G,o,,;s;as
to Rctnrnine Board and the elee,oral eor 1,
be dricks said that he proposed ID answer n,
IN Journal which had said that ~ III ao,,l,
~ | -. - ot@'N