, 1880-11-02
TIE COURTS.
Some important Decisions by
Judge Biodgett.
John v. Fnrwclt Again Sues tlle
"Ncws" for Libel.
New Suits, Divorces, and Othel
Legal Items.

LUCKY C1sE1)1TORS.
judge lslotlsctt ycstenlny decided several cases
Which he s tcutrl t1tar,ly TIM tat week or two
bit ilo,.o Ut tl,un happened tu ctt,tnln my nrs
ttuns Of general interest. Tho most Important
wns that 0f iforace II. Kelly ugAInst Rudolph
W0ts0n. ThGudnro Wollstcn, and uthors, whlca,
wits II creditors l'i'l III n Judgment for $1.la0N
rendered It, MHrcil. 1s7p, nynII,at Wolfsom l.
wulstcin. Tho firm did business In this
city during ls!S, md failcsI In 1annary.
car!tal. nnd during tho latter part Of
ls;s buuht n''omt $4,000 worth Of tn,,nrro md
t1t1urs. tho Rruntur pnrt OF whc, wns souh nftpr
ulspusct Ut below cost. With tho t,rpcuels tho
pn!.l Nil thoir Individual tlchts, leaving tho tIrtn
cIrtlltors ullt I'll the cn1, mud sd tho rcnsnln.or
Ut tho stocls to 'Fet1lunnl Nouberxcr fur ST.
9SsS0. Tho only consideration for this sa1o VII
II pest Indebtedness ditto by lu,n to Scs.Derger.
Itwns chnrgcl TINT thls sale, md nlsn dlvcra'
nthor cnnvsynt,ces. as well ~ tho pnytnents ot
tn nsuSi ;Jds dsoss s% sHnst ~ s. 3sn@nt h
n lona see %ry f;n MI, II o traus
5nllstei1 and tho t,ayncnt Of hbntt SliHD to
Mr. Mrs. Wo!fss.i, werc u sn!staGton Of pr'or ebts:
horo a bes m Inv in M s"s Yoe 1t tic assf's ,ne tasa s
.n9ra eon, be i" .iaubt that Wo,ls9n l.s liz;
III nuy hts individual tlclts out nr tho pnrt1ler
s..i, ,.ses !, ta l,een rclN.ts.i!y decided thu.
ihl uEluE1HEu III lalO uHlfLll1ti I1E[l@
hers of thu rn,. Tho proof !is 10 tl,o tIansuc-
linn with NcnbcrRcr sliowcd tho firm WIS III.
ts9tc e him y tllo ny urluunt stated: tio he'll
eot1l'l and wo,s'l hays cntcro,l up Judgment Ind
hs not bec9 lM The .lrn ,s.is at THO ti1ne 4.
circumstances they offered to Relt NcOs,Grxcr
tho rcina!tstl:r of their stuck. and ho tnok It 1T
e s M wh M II n"st pr1t to
Inv. Thcru WIS ,,o hulgc or frn,ltl on tho snle
ns far ~ Nouh9r9yr wns coneHsnc<l. l!c seemed
lin Il right tn ohan payment tut Of hls tlebtnra'
assets IT. Ito could ilp in. Nor wcre tho charges
ho rR' S au sz & hnvo so to fs, Ss d. H.
Tls easa q Weiler vs. Huntington was aso I.
" l iss fop aa a11!aa to reasa
so,. la'lls II oSlo County. t!nlveyeti II ~: IS
Ills frurkixtonal wifc. thu. Jiilac hell tio
conveyance fraudulent ns ngnimst complainant,
I Trst lHersg 'n t Gp enrSd a ccIrng
gnmp'anant' md Tint bis Judgment was lien
nnutIer .ercdii6r'a b!l. IN whicti Il ,Iccree was
%hs Ss"',ss'iet taRa"i; aa.!%l s t g
on. i n,otlon for tho distribution, onf
eertaIn, ronts md proliY received
srn1nmnu. atli situated u tho cornur or Luke
A,,d c!nrl< streets. botwGcn tho salo Under tito
Sffa Sss owe 5 tos toe sins'iSn OF tho n'c'
TIE GERMAN SAVINGS BANK.
o. II. Horton, Receiver 0f tho Gcrmnn Swings
hank. He'd report yesterday Of h,s nl1lcu do-
ings fur tho month OF October, which IL Us fol-
| luws:
RECEIPTS.
CMsl Mt Inst report. 81 tS
NUS ...."...... iiI!
4NIAsla+s.+ ..,.....s...., h~l
| Total. al.................... U53
DiHnUIts EMEHTS.
| Huca3rur'H lnun fund, ,,,,,. ,,,,,. JbGu
Interest IN slli1lB.. l40
Rcccty1r's c1pciisui. aD5-$3,S1{
Balance on hand and................. ......Si, i,S1J