Press and daily Dakotaian. (Yankton, Dakota Territory [S.D.]) 1880-1889, 1880-12-15
DISTRICT COURT.

of s. H. Gruber plaintiffs council and
Phil X. Faule attorney for defenlant.'
In the case Of Peter Stefiin vs. Herman
Haley was called and no one answering
was continued. L. q. Smith plaintiffs
attorney and French 4 Dewey, ,at.orn-
eys for defendant.
In the case of H. Sonthwick VS. Henry
Volen, notice of settlement filed and case
dismissed. 0. Shannon plaintiffs attorn-
ey and z. G. Wheeler for defendant.
The case of the city of Yankton VS.
Patrick Walsh, on motion of city attorney
$. H. Gruber was dismissed at the cost
of the plaintiff.
In the case of Julius Kent VS. G. l..
Ackley, Campbell & Smith attorneys
for defendant withdrew their appearance
and the answer.
In case of G. w. Delamater VS. Jane
Radelli, attorneys for appellant 0.
Shannon and $. L. Sphinx withdrew their
appearance, and the defendant in open
court stated that she was willing that
the Judgment below be affirmed.
The case of Nells Helgerson VS.. John
9. Wenzlaff, by consent of counsel
Messrs. Gamble Bros. for plaintiff, and
o. Shannon. for the defendant, was con-
tinued.
The case of Peter Larson--samc attor-
neys-continued.
The case Of Gunder Olsen vs.. John G.
Wenzlaff same attorney-was also con-
tinued.
The case Of T. Gunderson VS.. John G.
Wenzlaff-same attorney was also con-
| tinued.
The case of Peter Gunderson VS.. John
G. Wenzlatf-same attornevs-was also
continued.
The case of Frank A. Smith vs.. G. T
Rossteuscher. West & Dewey for plain
tiff and Tripp & Boyles for defendant
was settled.
The case of j. w. Glazier VS.. f. NJ
Coates, on motion OF S. L. Sphinx, plain
tif1's counsel, dismissed at plaintiffs cos
and without prejudice.
The case of Geo. Estetly & Son VS.. S
G. Putnam, continued by consent. o
Shannon for plaintiff and E. g. Smitl
for defendant.
The case OF James A. McNally vs.. H
Hefner continued by consent. S. H
Gruber for plaintiff and Gamble Bros
for defendant.
In the case of the Homo Insurance &c
VS.. Partridge, Hayward, ct al, VIM. T
Dewey, one Of defendants attorneys
withdrew his appearance.
The case of the city of Yankton VS.
Lottie Whitney, was tried by the iur.
and acquitted. S. Fl. Gruber for the cit
and Phil. X. Faulk for defendant.
The case Of Il. Y. Doul VS.. q. Rcet
was struck from the calendar on motiol
of Phil, X. Fanlk appellants attorney.
The case of Patrick NJ. Cornwall V:
Frank Heffner, settled. 0. Shannon fc
plaintiff and Dewey e West for defel
dant.
LII the case of the Manufacturers n:
tional bank VS.. Michael Coyn, Gambi
Bros. withdrew their appearance and a
lowed Judgment to be taken by defa',l
In the case of the Manufacturers Nj
tional bank VS.. Joseph Rehniks, the sam
proceedings were had as above. S. I
Gruber for plaintiff, and Gamble Bro
for defendant.
In the case of Alfred Palmer Us. E. ]
: Palmer, the defendants attorneys, Dey
ey & French suggested the death Of
NJ. Coates, one Of the plaintiffs, and |
consent the case was continued.
: In another case. same title as nbov
the like proceedings were had
The case of James T.. Bruce VS.. Ge
k w. Harris, was continued by consent.
s J. B. Harris for plaintiff, and S. L. Spir
for defendant.
On the 14th the following proceeding
s were had:
In the case OF L. E. Ainsworth VS.. Sio,
City and Dakota r. Il. Co.. the case w
$, given to the plaintiff to amend COZ
plant upon payment of costs per stip
lation filed. Gamble Bros. for plainti
# and Tripp & Boyles for defendant.
!, The case of Charles Dufiack VS.. Jol
SO J. Dutfack was partially tried by t
N jury when the parties settled the c.;
70 amicably as per stipulation flied. ri
"a X. Faulk for plaintiff, and @. Shaun
for defendant.
The case OF Peter Nelson VS.. c.
1g Christensen was dismissed ON motion
ey L. B. French, plaintiffs attorney.
nm In the case of the ST. Crolx luml
company VS.. Anna Krudwig, jury II
: was had yesterday, resulting ina verd
on this morning in favor OF plaintiffs
9, the sum of 500. N. J. Cramer for pl;
tiffs. and S. l.. Sphinx for defendant.
The case of the Home Insurance c,
'd: pany VS.. Partridge, Hayward, ct al,
ley tried by jury to-day. and resulted
verdict for plaintiff Of $3.50 against
,se PENDANTS. Notice of new trial given.
H. Gruber for plaintiff, and Gan
Brothers for defendants.
This afternoon jury was called in
r OF case OF E. II. Millard VS.. Frank *"
). S. H. Gruber for plaintiff and Oi
Shannon for defendant.
", Call and see the bargains l will ,
: - :. you on fancy goods just purchased
: hankrnnt sales il Chicago.