New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1880-09-17

rubbish: he ignores the letter This Ia tree,;c,
the Issues of the canvass in the higIp ane yc
" Have you heard from Maine :" asks a D mo.
crat of Republican. Yes. Those Greenlarker,
up there seem to be raising thunder They've swaI.
lowed the entire DemocTatic party. and came
| mighty near beating u.s..
Shall inhationsts anu repud ators rule this caun
try under man who halls their supposed su, cess
over honesty as glorious That is the que tion
for the North 20 answer
The Greenbackers say the Maine election demon
strates the coming disntegraton OF the Bourbon
Democracy and their final surrender to the despsed
rag baby" aud Hancock says this IS r" glouoasI
Has anybody heard Beltzhoover deny his letter
since its facsimile was published
Wade Hampton is silent. but he is undoubtcdly
chnckling to himself: " It's boom for the prinoI.
plies of Lee and Jackson" so 1t is.
Divided between the three parties and given in
round plumbers the vote IN Maine is as follows: Re-
publican, rs. 900; Greenback, 5O,OOO; Democratic
22 900. That shows whose victory it is, 10y putting
the Democratic party in Its actual position az The
tail OF the Greenback KITE.
The Superb says it is "goriousn which Is a con.
fession that he is not at all ashamed Of the crowd
of false-counters repudiators Inhatonlsts and re.
sumption repealers who have placed him at their
head.
Over one billion of claims stand ready to be paid
so the Solid South can. as Congressman
Ellis puts it, achieve the Senate the House and
the Executive. Is tho North ready to run the risk
of a =" change" like thatl
Barnum ought TO have rolled the barrel a little
way INTO the Maine woods. evidently.
The Republicans take the offices in Maine and
leave the Democrats all the disgrace. That was
-, NJ VI n.
the other day. wasn't 1t
Hancock has registered blunder, and the Demo-
Gratis have not carried Maine. Whose boom Is this
anyway
VIII some Democrat be kind enough to inform US
which IL the better Constitutional lawyer. Edmunds
or Hancock
The testimonials Of the leading citizens of Cham
bersburg to the character of Mr. Currden. the gem
tleman who received the Beltzhooyer letter and
who swears to it, as published in The TRIBUNE
yesterday from The Carlisle Herald, seem to make
an end OF the whole matter. Nothing remains but
for Mr.. Beltzhoover to hold his tongue absolutely,
and this he appears TO be doing. Wild horses could
not drag hun INTO court before the election.
Is Hancock any better than his partys If so, why
does he jubate publicly the supposed success
OF the enemies or the public credltf
English assures the Democracy that they will
have the same kind OF a victory IN Indiana As they
have had in Maine-that is n Republican Governor.
both houses Of the Legislature Republican. and r.
publican United States SenatOr. All right. Let
the NeW-lOrk brethren touch off another salute
Can a man who halls supposed Greenback sue.
cess az glorious be depended upon TO hold the
Democratic party, composed of lnfa'ionIsts from
the North and West and repudlators from the
South, back from repeating the Resumption Act and
flooding the land with cheap mOAey
The Tammany and Hancock concratuiaton.
reached the NJ line GreenbaclSnrs at the same time
Now if the Sout aern bulidozeTs and free-couuter
had sent one signed by Wade Hampton and Boz
Toombs the whole party would have been ropTe
sented. That would have been combination bob
.'superb and glorious 'Rah for change
Perhaps Hancock didn't send that glorious
dispatch to Piaisied. May be IT, " forgery"