Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1880-02-13

was SO In this case. The papers in the case
were duly authenticated, the law requiring
the signature of the demanding governor
alone. AS to the question of "proof," the
jrequisition set forth that lit had been repre-
sented TO me 1.-THE governor of Colorado) and
satisfactorily shown" that the relator was q
fugitive from justice, etc. This certificate
| or recital of the governor of Colorado was
unusual, in IT'S exactness, on the face of
| Inter State acquisitions. Gen. Start held
that the question involved was one of law,
and that all the law in its ninutest detail
had been adhered to. The prisoner was right
fully III custody and should be held. In
conclusion, Gen. Start was free to confess
that had Governor Pillsbury known what he
did now. that likely tbs warrant of arrest
would not have been issued. Bot question
or hardship accruing TO relator was not in
| volyed, but the whole matter turned upon
the Interpretation of the law.
| Mr.. Heard offered a few remarks in re-
spouse. He had not introduced the hard
ship accrulng to his client, were he COM
PEELED to 60 to Colorado to stand trial upon
q charge, not crime within this State. But
as Gen. Start had alluded to it, he declared
it would be an uncomfortable hardship under
the circumstances. Mr.. Frink was re-
putaole citizen of twenty years standing in
| this State. He stands charged on the oath
OF only one man, and of a crime not known
to our statutes. Under the circumstances,
considering the fact that no indictment had
been found, that the complaint was sworn to
by enc man only, and he supposed or self
alleged injured party, that the affidavit was
authenticated by simple magistrate only,
and that it was defective of itself, the relator
should be discharged. Mr.. Heard was
again particular, and quoted authority, to
show that the relator could not BIZ surrender.
ed under charge for which tho State in
which he lived took no cognizance as a
crime.
| Gen. Start thought that was covered under
the federal statute, where it declared requisi
tions could be made for one charged with
specified crimes or ''any other crime.''
| The Court stated that he was unwilling to
pass upon the case without giving it some
consideration, as it involved several impor-
tant and novel issues. However he was free
to confess that the complaint appear to him
as extraordinary and singular
one upon which to arrest and convey clti-
zen to another State for trial. Yet con,
sideration was necessary to see if the papers
|
cision would be reserved until 10 o'clock 10.
morrow to-day.
| OUT OF COURT.
confab, after the above hearing, with
Mr.. Frink and friends revealed nothing
new. Mr.. Frink was emphatic in denying
and wished it announced, that
be had never offered anything fol
sundry racy letters, which, it is alleged
Detective Arnold has in his possession, and
which, it is said, passed between Frink and
the Moore woman, since Frink's return
home. So far as that's concerned, Detective
Arnold corroborates Mr.. Frink.
Arnold, however, says he's got the letters
and gives salaclous wink when asked about
their import. He declines giving them to
the newspapers, because "he's promised the
| old man not to do SOL