Arizona silver belt., 1880-05-01

kIeman. On notion of the Distrie. Attorney, this case was dismissed.
 M. N Tbarsing vs Webfoos S. N. Co. Plaintiff moved for a decree n accordance wrh the jjalgtnent of fhs coar. at us October tssm 1873 Ds- fen6ant obieciea and saom s.ea Fs- settlement statement on m0tlen fgr new triaL
 Henry M Porter vs Read < Ham mohd. Dem4rrer wlghdrawn aud ss1 days al.owe defendaass o aasaes.
 John II. H;se vs Frank AnaloF 1 Demurrer overruleI and aefsudsHs allowed ten days to snswer. Territory Of Anzona ys Ea@ar' IF. Gleason. This case vas agsia tried. the jury being out bat a shos, time returue1 into court with a yer dict of not guiify Defendant was tbeseUpon discharged
 FRIDAY April l6h
 Territory of Arizona vs John H lGIbbons. On mo1Ion of Disnics Attorney the charge against deiena- anl was d.snhssed.
 Territory uf Ar.zona rs T. B lOBris& lee charge agsiuss de- { fsD 3anl sSs iisAl.ssed Ju mefloa ef the N;suscs sUarRey.
 J. (. slelHIosh ys C. Putnam gaat,aaed ua,il the next term of Icoat by censsnf.
 Terruary of Arzoua vs Louis Mo Irag4. Case c0asiBued for tie term on motion of the District Attorney.
 W. V. Kingsbary ys 6eRa. Allen Is. M. go. Plaintiff allowed so withdraw summons now on 6Ie in this case to enable him to make proper return of serwce.
 Territory of Arizona vs J. W. Harold. Tais case was tried before tue court, after the exdmIastlon Ot witnesses the case was submitted Q the court for decision without argu- ment-
 Holt & Burns vs James T. Cine. Plaintiff moved for an order to sell personal property of defendant nov under artachment. Notion taken under a,lvisement.
 Territory of Arizona ys Thomas P. Kerr. This case was continued 1, for the term and ordered set for rlal on Monday the 18th day of October 1880.
 All special trial jurors wers dis charged for the term and the rsgu- lar trial jurors were excused nnnl a the 22d inst
 SATURDAY, April l7th.
 Territory of ArIzona vs J. "
 Harold. Judgment ordered enter : ed in favor of defendant without costs. J. De Noon Reymert vs Wans | Whata $. 8L. Co.,, 112. Demurrer
 overruIed and ten days allowed ts ]. answer.
 s J. D. Reymert vs Wana Whats s
 M. Go. 1S8. Demurrer oyerrales ]. and ten days allowed to ausvei s M. ". Bremen vs ". Middlsto'
 k Go. Demurrer overruled and tei  < days allowed to answer. n Territory of Arizona ys Southern U Pacific k. R. Go. Demurrer over
 ruled and twenty days allowed to an F sWer.
 l- Territory of Anzona vs samae r. P. Thayer. appellant This eas
 came up on motion for new uial st ,s ter argument of counsel. t vas sub ,. aitied to and taken under aarse .d inent hy tbe court.
 M. ] Logan vs J. ] Fosourgh . Demurrer confessed and tEssF ,n lays allowed so amend. > Territory of Arizona vs v V le Aorrs. On moacn Of tue Dis1fie
 Attorney the charge agains. defend .d ant wss dismissed aud be WAS d's ID charged from custody lg AoNnAY, ApriI l9Eh. a Territory of Arizona vs Sampl fs P Thaver. Case remaneed to Ju. e tice John Aiillerf for nee u'ai ' Josepha Valencio vs Alearie "a r' leuclo. Case ordered dlsnlssed 2 ~ consent
 ]. Kohu gs J Gpiplsei { c
 Two days addinenal t.me gE ansed e to feadsnis s8 answer. a- D. Frsdeurach vs J. Gu.naam
 d. TNo days a0alaopa Eime gran y. Id defendants 10 answer F Serapio PerslEo ys Psdre Blanc
 Demurrer wilh0ravn, plaan1ii iaoF' s For decree ID accordance Tlsb pray l- of complaint, motion taken aN't
 t-t ff'l,..ss -