, 1880-01-08
question Of the weight Of evidence. Judge
Wilson held tho plaintiff had not made out

=@@=.I:@=:-7=;7 !. -.-::7,=:=-= 7:;.
WILSON, he'd Ct III te Stk psnt IL lad not made out
his ease, and reversed tho case.
The suit at Paw sInftil and otI,ors, ad.
n'i,.htIaeore I, ~ .! ~ .: NM'.' W. ~ ,se,?a..
H. Ue founR WIS of1glnally w De 1oung
tn recover aalary from Wallaoe "A book
kssper a.a s so'k ., The IA Appsats sd at, , Court by by
COurt below in Ills favor, ''0''
In tho cnso OF A1nos G. DarstoW, Jr,, Va.
LaCl,!an McI,nelilan and others, ne DEERE
. she Iomrs below was leyetsea NJ, & 1 co'.ecs sn.
nrra,,"n,.s nun Thc drcree of fha AntnliafI
Court was rer c0rIatn.
Tile ease Ut j. b. brown va. A. i. Reasnnr
aiiu 1tnefs tnfiiea on tne question as 70
,fai WtlJ, H. arn J., ,aIntWs ia NJ HIVE
ths f,avce. was n,,arnI,ty. .t,.lrr DajirY
snid tho rttlo WIS that wlero the ilnne Of a
party MT the pnycn Of note WAS f9tind writ
ten OF tna naeK oi nuM. IL wo"tT r ~ Pr, ,,ae
9N' fhe casc IN IN tn nresemi insin;,ce an that nrs
sumption had not been rebuttci BY TIC EVIL
!lercr. TIE lu4gment Of tho Court below,
jjrued,
Tho case Of Davis vs.. Blackwell turned on
tho question Of the power Of one pnrt,ler to
e sSf5 bvt. A II p ihd LqGs 1 pqsfr n,ncs wtn II
bcr. iS70 made q 1,oie for $1,000.
md signed It HAlert b. I.uomis, !" md
then guaranteed by him III the name
was lnatte for I1oUlnIs' private Use, and TINT
U lad no authority to glye the iirnl Kllarai,-
tee. The Court bslowe . gaye tho plalntiii
Judgment, but the Appellate Court reversed
power to bind Tho firm by such act,
,r11F 1fAynEN 1rARrAa Conrus.
,r,a ,,a,,no.- -o,,~.,a 49,, ~ p,sa 11ar,1n,, n
eet possession 0, her 10Y oeeupleG a'l the
afternoon yesterday, before Judge Bnrn,ln,
o,,cstio, is the son Of t1,e petitloner sud Fred
erlck N, Atwood, Several witnesses werc
examined to show TINT the mother never coli
sentcl 10 let the boy bo taken away from, llur
permanently. The father Fred N. Atwood,
took the stand and gaye Ills testimony in n
,n,,, o.rai,u. ,pov na t},cuv,, tha ,v1,nIo nro.
e, eon5 ro..as VAL ,o ~ "na a ,u m' ,,th
cceuamg WY JoNe "''n i''s eonl'eg,lon g, Win
II enuFely lmhocent. ile swor' Nose sur.
rendered tho child to him for the purpose of
having It put In n suitablc home, and flc ttook
IL to the orphan asylum, temporarily. Rose
knew llo wns q married ma1l before lie caislc
out llere. lie. first got q Utah divorce, from
lis wife, n,ll knowing TINT WIS worthless,
had repeatedly promised to marry Rose, but
se meyer Mouil c4nscho M ,Y4en1i %e t1o Meclg5vG r
as''''io's az acoIsI' ill., nn1 sa,, tiat Wns % tha
objection he had to lnarry,ng her lie first
k,iuw thc child was 1t WI. j, Dmrlinn's
thrnl,r ri, Rosr.
Mrs. Durlinin testified she had never seen
AtWnod uniii Yesterday III court SIn first
wn,tti ia tnke ltis l}ttfe rirj. hit i}nuily
Changed lIcr t,ii1ui and atIoptei the boy.
Mr.. Durhanl testified tint he wished to
tnrlietl tn lin. md Wgre nbl. 10 nrorite for
him.
This closed the Testimony, md the closing
arguments viii be heard tits Afternoon,
-
nYyonrUc
nooroo A Wall, 5,,ni a III root,r;,ov FIR
dcofge A. We1c' N'ca oilt Sestcruay lor
divorce from Louisa Wclcli, Charging her
with adultery.
Gcorra n. burlington askcd for n divorce
fro,u Anrui. 71nr.ngto,, nv tta ,,rn,',,,I ~
iEoaa h,!li'le ouriils'o''' oll Liz R9ounu OF
desGrtlnm. ss!'al ls n o,oaa,,., ,,,,,. ,t,,,,,nx
, IMlcs T.. atgeHuMhn IT, ~ ,aKSS s!,'i.mr l.a.
citKy @ ,s:I, uEs. i l, III WIZ SnaMUsmE ~ aess-
, Holl WY M % he si,ou'a hot oe competent 10 SUP
pIt .,r ~, HSar,,,,, ,,,,,nr T., ,,,,,o ,,,4