Daily press and Dakotaian. [volume] (Yankton, Dakota Territory [S.D.]) 1875-1880, 1880-02-03
Anew MORE TRUTHS.
A. IntsrvieJEssssash a western Man Brins,
AZ 4Rem Out.

reAa6atisyn - Dismissal or Nj. Schurz
: .WhyIshould Sohurz be removed ?"
= "Beca6Se hsis.tesponsible for the reunov.
al Of Codrrnisaf6nef Smith who performed
;shisfd1ties vel, add honestly. Because be
e~terschamber commission 10
-blacE1n eAmip6's character in order 10 re-
smove hiph,audIImske a placSfor his friend,
sHayt. Because Hayts only Recommendation
TO SchnrS, for tRe. place was kis enmity to the
Grant; administration that had caused his
renoYal G fron .,-the busatfd 81 Indian
pesos canmiisioners. on sskssssoans u con-
pligfsy with Contractors, 66Idsbecause Nj.
Sc4usf has dong been 9aguixsDt of the
arhats9ry, t%yrsnhtcal. and c6ffupt course Of
Hayt.S but haS seen 1T to detesd him with /.
oute1en investigating for himselrskp many
sertDQ1 charger thpt have beeus brought
.gafnst Hayt. sIurhe controversy between
Gen. Sherida91ud Schurz it va apparent
that the defelsS oysthe Indian l6uroau was
made oct byssHsyt himself Snd simply
fatkered BY Schurz, and the whole conduct
of thessecretary during that controversy
-shoEed that twas useless for Sheridan to
furdtsA evidence OF corruption 10 the In
dlaog service. when theaastmple denials of
HaIt were taken By ss9chnix 40 law and
kvoSUAs ANV01kG OIL u &80s000EKS8 m8Q6 U6s
fore the peace commissioners, except that
relating 10 the Artzona mine, we're substan.
-sAfilyss speeSenAd & by Sheridan, but Mr.:
:6chuIz,ivho had invited Sheridan 70 pre-
sent hin with. any evidence be might have
OF rottenhess ID fhe bureau, pronounced
Judgment on the denial BY Hsyt, and'fromml
lhstsdsy 70 this hds msde no effort to arrive
atthe tIuth3inl tbeE matter. fsIsuchs man
mar frho9has made enmity to i former.
admfnistfstlon the principal qualification
for official position III his Departments
person FWho shoulder DO all adviser of
the PRECEDENT! IsEdSn1d think not. The
main efforts Of himself and subordinates
have been tosthfov mud at Grants admin
istration, aid when pfejndices If that or any
other character are the leading points in the
administration Of a Experimentation they
are fostered byrits head-the head should
co. .@MssaAQas
arAs ref11sns of syAurz ar. .up.r6ci.l-I
hssalw11 p manages td,s51(et them tp6ksn Of ii
" ne33 As-andEEfhe public, The ippresi-
dSfat. I'D ev0119s3sSanrz htz1aself, have ali.
been deceived bY Schurz, secretary. aay
schurz has been deceived BY Secreta. )
Schurz, because he is . man governed en-.
tirely BY his prejudlces, and has scarcely .
practical idea in his head. He IL . brilliant
writer and speaker, but lacks common sense.
snd When she trle 1MaEdpess q. the Indian
oeparqne13 oseomss knoxp, The administra
lScnpt Sef sadss1tch Chandler will
selns aoafn a;9podst.ihse, 1t would have
You have spoken Of the tyrannical con-
duct OF Commissioner Hsyt. To what do
you refer &
Ireated all who have had business with his
Who weEe not his special psts, but
more particularly to bis arbitrary removal of
szssa'' q go 6. p = .@s Sa', Il ss. 2i sssf: . he pas p..
prs and their personal property. And
.boye Al l refes e bis jmprisonent of an
'aoecsns rsfson q Fort Robinson fol sever
j. monsnh sad TO mis- latter Transaction
schurz was as much . party as
Rros3 into lie eusrdshS5.. y NJ FL 1 RnSs
81. n Ersiv iSsnect.d nfs s,..i;".
TOM Ne lBdiaT dsnsrtrssntSss.ins, ~
psrooiestF q q The ns1ifitafy. Who vere ohl;red to