Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1880-11-10

incentive. In It's recunary results TO the state he did not
claimed The reports showed that the state treasury
On motion OF Mr. FOWLER OF Randolph adjourned.
House-Afternoou.
Unfnished busHsss-7he moisfD ia,e,-I. ss up
Mr. FFIELD OF Montpelier said he did not intend say
much on this question. lie was neither very pronounced
we have statute law on The COOKS he wanted to have x
oy cn thought 81 would ST 90 ns ss s injury q
temperance cause The question !, whether ths little In
complainant aids the enioIcewent Of ne law or not In re
@ Spon e sSs d S Of @ o T cne S the
ne went 70 ne niormer and arss Snmher Q, prescott
nent, who got onehalf the fine. In 1876 this law
peele and since that time three cases had been reported
that made the II Is said that the states attorney
Rcn The soi over sc lie was not I'm" IN favor Of The
state making money in THIS Tsy but Il caused The lay to be
thai he knew OF anything who did hs business from
Cling was punsn Under he old law. il i true e. as Tie
gentleman from Huntington the government had 10
abused But who could say this law had been abuse In
repeal IL but to repeal This clause would cut heart ont
oft lie was not very decided prohibionis nor was he
and he believed that the maintenance OF the cety clause
Mr. TAFT Of burlington ds-ented from the view that the
moety clause tended to induce the enforcement OF the
instance Of the good effect Of this clause lie wss informed
ence Of Judge bun,on and that il would have oecnred
even II there had been moey clause lie gave statistics
Claimed that he proRSoy law no morn Depended Tor IT,
enforcement upon themoiey clause than did the law against
MIR. DART of weatherseld said that it wa. claimed by
ceptiona Well fighting exceptional evil
% sn WI o aye If ANN any sS @
would nut down the evil and he hoped the moey clause
Mr. BROWN Of Grand Isle replied to the views advanced
by the gentlemen from Montpelier and Wea,hersled He
was debsuchng to public morals and he was against on
Mr.. BOOTH OF Morristown believed that all men would
DO their duty better u they paid for it, and he hoped
Mr.. smith Of Il. john.bury took similar view. lie
demorazns Effects of the liquor traffic pefvaded all
MI CoLBuRS Of Springfield said that the repeal Of the
enough Tor him. Du lie should vote fpr is maintenance A
ter liquors dealers succeeded in getting It abolished that
ton law believed that four-afths OF the Temperance
Mr. cHHPIS Of Niddie.eI ssid that the moety system
vas 6TIbe 70 ,nformer. and he was against II
formed BY jgdg. vea1ey that he had cogyersed with s
and was iod by tben hat they wanted the moety law
peaed iha' MI lawrence The state; attorney Of Rutland
come Into h pockets by means q the moiely lay was og
PA Ru M SSs e ssa S Ss s h.
he moleiy clause would BE- repealed He himself knsM
id not believe that any one wanted to feel that they were
liable 70 The mpnie,9n Of soIda moye, He would stand
MT. spEScER Of wilmington d,m,ndsd the yea, and
Yeas 65 nays ISL 50 The third reading Of the bill was
fused The following is the list:
Brown Bryant Bninterteld Cameron Cunningham 1, Cha
lon Of Dinmersien, Ey-Godiad Farnhsm, Fefee, fSh
Fletcher toett, FORD, 6oode, Could ~ wnihan, Has.
Ard. M.lloI; ScdeIt,ieE, Morrison ferTy Of isnsoct
Ga n5S9 81
ISsiiord; IsmpleiSn Th.ysr. Wai.,Sosse, Webb West
wsn Mhe & sO OF WSSs Adams of Brighton
Adams Of pomi,et Allen Of Enoso1rsh, Allen q Fai
Black Bsir, Bolton Booth Of MoiTi',Swn; briggs
CisTE Of Wil.ton Clark q Windsor Cobb Of strsford
bsas besn g'l Bs
button Of Goshen farman Ferguson fisd Foster
s SSS f ssd; Ssq SnSS
.s ;IS ,q i s gi
S S Fsse a%s 5sSea9 Fs%., 3 ' %sisrS SSS
Rogers Of waterve Rogers Of Wheelock sargent seare
s@fpf Gasr @
Strong 81 aGfi
Gwley T TaSy dprIsr was whe. 81 WhSsS
wilson, wrisht-lsI. '''''
House etsorrst9n-The house portion Of i9nt com o.
Of the recent , Of oe e eS OF NJ 20 ss 4, 1, sr
ordered lie and the OF copies ordereC
to Be- printed The report praised the an @ highly
eSGoS n, w9hop sG sSsins small piece Of land
appropriation Of slooc Tor the PROPOSED extension Of tn
Workshop Of forty feet also IN appropriation Of $500
The Officer, reanion.-A Joint resolution came IRON tn
wednlay evenns to- To- the w Vermont oe.Ts reunion so
cetv for It's annual meeting; adopted IN concurrence.
in T the csdsaS Of % sSa .se r.
81 s Sn sS. II ssd anS o to shS9
s. S. act in amendment OF the charter OF the farmers
10 pay Isaac X iapp sdmaislraio, & $sofss
Men L Il
' Reporfs%Fro@ The Judiciary CON-, by Mr.. FlFIELD,
M eopanes sr rned easneG the ooee
The bill s nrd reading ordered S SFn 6
orty o. the committee In favor Of H. lse an act relating
posaIs Of amendment, which weT. agreed TO- THE lid a
amended provides that married woman who is trader
sued in all matters connected with such business. In III
ssue sgant and be levied o. her sole separai
goods, chate. and estate but the body Of such woma
shall not be taken In execution except now provided
Mr. PAGE of Rutland he should have to vote again.
MT. FTFiELD explained SAYING tina, now the only rem
edy was in ehancery. This bill allowed remedy In law
The pauper ldr-H a. an act in amendment OF chap |.
recommiiied TO the com. on judiciary pending The qgeso
held Of whlii1gham was, mis- afternoon. reported ad
se by s No. e osnn Of saS e Of as
MIR. Buttered's amendment to strike OF the bi
pa as Of 9afE han alf ns s a
e % state for ths term Of Ten war and during sal
chargeable said town shall gain settlement In the
In witch he resides ST.
Mr. BuTTERFlE ED advocated his amendment and wa
followed by Mr.. Taft OF Burlington and Mr.. Krnfew
Ryegat- on the same side. Mr. Thompson OF lrasburg
and Mr. Briggs Of Brandon opposed It, Mr.. ButeIneld
amendment lost and the third reading bill
then refused.
= Oieomargarine.-The committee agriculture by NJ
Colbnrn OF Springfield epoIt favor Of H. l25,
prevent deception in sales OF butter which to prevent q
surreptous sale Of oleomatgarine under heavy pena
Mr. Colbum explained that the bill substantially u
the upon the the book OF Mass
chuses and that was In the interests OF the farmers
Vermont third reading ordered for Tomorrow afternoon
Reporti. the committee on Judiciary, by NJ
SIMPSON OF Crafbury adversely to H. 2O4, act 10
peal act relating To the collection Of town taxes, al
proved November ~. 1855 Third reading refused,
From the committee by Mr. THOMPsON OF Ira
burgh in favor of H. 1874 an act in addition TO chap ~
entitled OF GUARDIAN and wards. third reading
tomorrow forenoon THE bill provides that In
suits for against insane persons spendhrtf Il
guardian may he cited In defend prosecute
mlntrRors and eSecutors Of deceased persons
q On motion OF Mr.. HlSCkLEY q Chelsea II. Y, an a