New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1880-10-31

met Before that the letter had been returned "a
me. There was no one present with Dir. Hart. hr
Jewell was acc. mpaned ny hs secretary. 3ir Hart
endeayOred 20 impress upon Ar. } well that what
ever hc wa5 doinr he desired that / should have
the credit Of, and tried hard 10 get some dreci
promise If consideration for me from him or from
General Carried. Then FOR ths frat time / thought
Doe had some sinister motive. / iulmedia ely SAID.
10 the presence of Mr. Jewell. that wJufcl no such
pronise that was entirely sat III 20. aud tat what
ever l had done IA the mat f"r ls SIMPLY because
Nr. Hart had voluntarily tod mc that. believing rs
had hcen deceived. be wiling n on ae Or JUS
Ice, 70 make the necessary correction. Itt the
ROOM and Mr. Jewell with his src-star. and Ar.
liar togrt hcr for nearly hOGf. Before they
Jet my otlice went back 90 tle rolm 1Bd 'ir Hart,
in the presence Of Mr. Jewell uac tle drccl pom
ise that while he could MOI al at once come over
and declare the paper q forgery. Pc wou.i the next
Gay, wednesday, have an article in nun substal-
tally az follows:
snce he publication % General Carl lds expcif 10.
nul been led 10 invest gaze fh- matter urtner
uld stl pursuing the Investigation VITA some DOUBT
as 10 tle anihentcity OF the letter. Ena
heretofore maintained /. Vas o genuine document
Mr. Jewell and felt satisfied that Sc had gained
a great point. frl auXi0u, about tbs matter ana
went down 90 IHhps oti' % see iA,t every
thing was all night. Mr. Hart stated IN The presence
# my brother that lie thought the paper
was making "a mistake 10 arAno"leeging tlat
n had been deceived, Dut as he bad promised
% make the retraction be would do so Wednesday
morning found. instead Of making me rr facuon
or paw ng the way for one, 1rfm reiterated tne
libel. NOW have come to rb. coIcl -iJn rlAt, tax
~ advantage of my b ing thrr cour-c aud friend,
the managers Of that uaper wer. u u1 20 ct.
through w', some paper lrOm General Garfield Or
Mr.. Jewell which would LOOK iIe RIB. 40 m luce
them tO max. tIc rctrdD ton ana ult then pub
sn chat evidence OF the g'uuncness IF fhe lettr.
IL tbs they were oiled for The letter written ~
Mr. Jewell contain, tie distinct statement. al
ready mentioned. taat tue Truth ne pie Were
satisfied OF the fal-ity OF The Chinese
letter. ami weIo wllIag o. Their own
accord 10 make the Correction; and 10 pro-
Mise Is stated as c1D,dar4tHu tha- tacy should
DO so. During the day Umars ciue 10 me irom
various sources. that Ir1ih u-end~d tO publish
facsimile of tLIs jewell De- ter. sougut Sir. Post.
aud found nIu az restaurant lu NA-slu-sL, q ming
With Nj. Hart. asked whether 10 vas true tbIt
they mtrH Le,i 10 publish a COPY 81 Mr.. Jewe-ls
letter. / sand .. cOud not burt Dir. Jewell Il could
not uurt Genera. Garfield nor co..d q hast the Re-
publ can party. Dui 10 mIght place ne IN a iliae
position. NJ. Tart then made 70 d.sunct PROPOSE
ton - me. 3D. the hearing OF MS brother, that 10
would moi publish J.c iettcT II | wOuid stop tie
prosecution against Mr.. Pulp. | declined. stating
thar could not re used for any -nca purp se, tnat
| would not CDItIt could, and could DOT dO lr %
would. Again asked whether he meant TO publish
the letter Hart replied All Is Tar 10 VA, Is
business. ~
Ex-G0yernor Jewell said when stoned:
lhe statement II Mr. DittcnhUeiDr is ,ubstan-
italy correct do not TANK 80 Necessary lor mc
to say anything further"