Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1880-02-05
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.
Department No. 1.

SAN FRANCISCO, February I'd.
599o-Dent vs. Hoibrook-Argued by Harrison
for appellant and Du Brutz for respondent, and
cause submitted.
dith for respondent to dismiss the appeal herein
Clerks Certificate and notice of motion file sub
mitted.
6925-Frederick vs. De Tierney-Motion of Mere
dith for respondent to dismiss the appeal herein on
Clerks certificate and notice of motion on le sub
mitted.
G946-Holbert VS.. McKearnan ct al-Motion OF
Pilsbury for respondents to dismiss the appeal
herein Clerks certificate and notice OF motion on
file, submitted.
6947-Gray VS.. Lyon = Motion of Pilsbury for
respondents To dismiss the appeal herein on Clerks
certificate and notice OF motion on file, submitted.
Thurnaur vs.. Reay ct al; Lieberman vs. Reay ct
al; kousset vs.. Reay ct al; Freeman vs.. Reay ct
al; Held vs.. Reay ct al. Forrest VS.. Reay ct al
Adams VS.. Reay ct all Rousset ct al. vs. Reay ct al.
On motion of Seawell for appellants, and good cause
being shown therefor by the affidavit OF z. II.
Daley it is ordered that appellants have ten DAYS
further time in which TO file the transcript on APP
peal in the above entitled causes.
59S6-Du Brutz ct al. VS.. Jessup-Argued bv
Belcher for appellant and Brooks for defendant and
order affirmed.
l04S0-Ex parte Mary A. Kelly on habeas corpus
1t is ordered that a writ of habeas corpus issue
out OF and under the seal of the Supreme Court Of
the State OF California directed to the said Thomas
Desmond, commanding him to have the body OF
said Mary A Kelly before Hon. Robert Felral,
VuuSS Vi Do al tiieub W.. - oupeiipI oOie vi 'io
city and county OF San Francisco at the Court
of said Court on the 4th day OF February, A. D.
1880 at 10 O'Clock A NJ. OF said day, 10 do and re-
ceve what shall then and there be considered con-
corning the said Mary A Kelly, together with the
time and cause of her det- ntion and that he have
then and thsre the said writ. MORRISON, j.
Department No 2.
5913-Stuart VS.. Mahoney II. Co. ct al.-Argued
~ Ha ~, spPe,iap' anu DerSih ior responueu''
80 soS go n II ~ s.i,;t. -, l., NJ. Co,
onneIiant and SrIIvian Snr rasSondant md canse
srbmittad M -'- ie'p0'''e"'' ''i'N'
5a5o I1rs+ora 40 VIII; ,,od h I,rol,o for m,
raiian+ III IT, pf o. -. e. 5 80 ~ I'M n.nsa
ssnbTn;t.ad ''' iS'fOi-0'' "N 1890
~ 81 poo,,a -. cu,,,,,,,,r or,arod ,,.+ c.rs.
be hoard on Sat,'ria, EaIr,,ary Tth a. ocIoci,
70 ''"'u 'ii '"'uiuA'' i0Oiu ''"' ~ o'o0A
r. a. D..,.x. N.
N'p"''"'',r' ~
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3D.
6953-San Francisco Gas Light Company vs.. w.
H. shaoer, treasurer, etc. oh reaolng anu ming
the affidavlt CT +. Donohue, 1t Is ordered that an
alternative wit oil mandate issue heren returnabe
before the Court IN bank on Monday, the 9th day OF
February, 1850, at 10 o'clock A. NJ: 1t is hereby
GU LIZ; Snas ve heien DC nequsu W
,Iav of service. and be served with COPY of this
orde
6O97-pavne eft al Va Mckinley ct al-On mo.
ton OF Lake and by consent cause submitted on
briefs on file
602s-JewelI Of al vs. Mckinley ct al-On motion
of Lake and by consent. cause Submitted on briefs
on file.
1924 6925- Frederick vs Tiernv-NIotion to dis
miss appeal denied
5Ses ipoard Of Education of San Francisco We
Herman ct al -Arpued bv Parker and Shafter for
anneIIant and Cone for resnondents and canse snb
Initted
5s99-Boaid of Education of San Francisco VS..
Martin ct al-Submitted upon argument in No
5s9s
6354-WiIliams ct al. VS.. Hartford Insurance
Company-On notion of Haven for appellant and
sug1estion Of diminntion Of the record herein or.
dered that the transcrnt he amended nv INSERTING
tbarain Tho notice of apneaI
6eSa I;ahbrand vs 2tto ar al IN motion NJ No
Cam for appellants and suggestion of dm,nuton of
the record herein IL s orered Thai tho transcr;nt
on file be amended in accordance with the stnula.
t;or on fila
6057-Ka llooo We Naver IN motion of Roche for
appellant ordered that the appeal be and is hereby
dismissed.
o0Sl-plngley ct al VS. Greene ct ai.-on motion
OF van Dyke Tor appellants, cause ordered TO be
heard in Department No. l.
59S6-Du Brutz VS., Jessup-Oplnion filed
5946-Holoert vs. Mchearnan-Appeai dismissed.
094'-Gray VS.. Lyon-Appeai dismissed.
Department No. e.
6sss-Root OF al Va Rrrant of al n, motion Of
Cow fo- s,neII,nts ordar. 20 sbnv1 o,,s ,,,;,a
NH 70. l,,drron w o'0
6OO7~McWanns vs Rrumaoin,- On motion of HOY.
danfedt for rnsncnden and suggestinn az tho daatb
nj Js.belIa NcNanns tho nIa,1t;ff and annoIIan,
herein since the fling Of tha tr,nscrrt n this
Court and that Daniel Sweeney is the snecia, adj
min;strator ~ tba esta, Of saiJ IsoheiI, Mcairms
deceased it is ordered that said Daniel Sweeney be
and he is hereby substituted as plaintiff and appel
lant herein IN place and stead OF said Isabella Nc
manus deceased.
o9oo-MeLean vs.; McNamara.Argued by Brooks
Tor appellant ana Bergin, Lyncn and Harrison Tor
respondent, and cause submitted.
o9os-Page VS.; Iucker-Argued by Cr1ttenden
Tor appellant anu Sharp for respondent, and cause
submitted
| WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4th
IN Memorldn-Edmond L. Goold,Hon. W. W.
| cope presented the memorial ana reSoutlons
ADOPTED oy tne San Francisco Bar Association on
January 81, 1851 OF respect 10 the memory OF Ed
mona MOI Lewis GOOD, member OF the ASSOCIATION,
ahu moved that II De spread upon the minutes OF
| tne court. III was SO ordered
Inc Court adjourned.
Department No. 1.
| 6n57-KelIopovs Movers On motion os c,,,,n;sor
for respondent IL il ordered that rentt;tnr ;,,a
| forthwith
| 6OO2 -Dowd We MAYNARD Auditor etc Motion