Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1880-05-19

pany-By consent of counsel ordered that this cause
be continued TO the October session.
TUESDAY, May 18th.
In Bank.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
r. F. Morrison, C. j., presiding E. W. Mckinst:y,
j.; j. ID. Thornton, j.; s. B. McKee, j; NJ. IL Ny
rick, j.; Z. NJ. Ross j.; j. Il. Sharpsein, j.; Frank
W. Gross, Clerk II. C. Finkler, Bailff.
10,515-Ex parte Denis Kearney, Habeas Cor
pus-Argument concluded by Smoot and Murphy
for the People and Barbour for petitioner and cause
submitted
Adjourned to Monday July 9th, next, at San Fran
CISCO
Department No. l.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
E. W. Mckinstry, j., presiding; S. b. Mckee, j..
E. NJ. Ross, j.. Frank W. Gross, Clerk; Henry
c. Finkler, Bailiff
6707-Aldrich VS.. Willis ct al.-Judgment affirmed
McKlnstry, j.; Ross, j., and Morrison, j.. concur
ring
6793-McBeth ct al. vs.. Mcintyre ct al-Argu-
ment concluded by Goodwin for respondents, and
Hall for appellants, and submitted.
People VS.. Alvitre-Argued by Arick for defend
ant and Assistant Attorney General Blanchard for
the People and submitted.
59lI-Moulton vs.. Parks ct al.-On motion of
Belchel and by consent, ordered that this cause be
heard by the Court in bank, in the city of San Fran
cisco, on Monday, the Goth day of July, 1880.
65S7-Sgourney VS.. Zelerback ct al.-On motion
of Hupp, and by consent of counsel herein ordered
that this cause be continued to Thursday next, the
goth instant.
6744-Carr Vs. Central Pacific Railroad Company
Argued by Bullock for appellant and Craig for
respondent, and ordered that the ju 1gment herein
be and the same is hereby affirmed.
6465-Dunell vs. trasier-Argued by A. L. Hart
for appellant and Harrington for respondent, and
submitted.
64s0-Bredefeld VS.. Read ct al.-Argued by A. L.
Hart for appellant, and harrington for respondent,
and submitted
6526-Cousa County vs. De Jarnet-- Argued by A.
L. Hart for respondent, and judgment affirmed.
Adjourned until tomorrow morning at 10 o'clock.
Department No. 2.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present, J.
D. Thornton, j., presiding; NJ. II. Myrick, j.; J. X.
Sharpstein, j.; Charles N. Post, Deputy Clerk
Perre kewen, Baillff.
6492-Himan vs.. Newington-Argued by E. V.
Spencer for appellant, and argument on behalf OF
respondent continued until tomorrow.
6s47-Beeson Green Mountain Gold Mining
Company-Argument resumed by Variel for
spondent and Goodwin for appellant and cause SUBJ
mitted, with ten days to each to file additional
points and authorities.
63S5- wedekind vs. Craig ct a--Argued by Dam
eron for appellant and Tuttle for respondent and
cause submitted.
Court adjourned until 10 o'clock A. NJ. tomorrow.
In the matter of the admission of w. W. Likins as
attorney and counselora at law, an order to show
cause having been heretofore served upon said w.
W. Likins, and be having appeared on the return
thereof and hearing having been continued at his
request, and now the said order coming on to be
heard and said Likins not appearing the Court hav
ing considered the matter, and it appearing that
before the order was made by this Court admitting
said W. w. Likins as attorney -at-law, he had
been admitted as an attorneyat-llw by the District
Court Of the Eleventh Judicial District, in and for
the county of Ell Dorado, which admission was by
said District Court revoked and he removed
after a trial of charges made against him tor unpro
fessiona conduct, and that this Court was not in
formed of such trial, revocation and removal, but
that information Kept from this Court to the end
that he might obtain admission by this Court with
out its having knowledge thereof, and that this
Court was thereby imposed upon as to his character
and fitness it is ordered that the order Of this Court
made on the 18th day of January, 1880, adm ting
the said W. W. Likins as an attorney and counselor
atlaw be and the is revoked and set aside and
the license issued to him cancelled and recalled.