The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1880-10-20
COMMISSIONERS NOTICE.

GUILD & CARRINGTON. TRUSTEES,
~ VS.. MACFARLAND'S ADMINISTRATORS,
IN THE cHANcERY COURT OF THE CITY OF RICH
MOND.
The following Is a copy OF the decree entered 10
this cause on the 26th day Of June, 1SsOi
This cause came on this day TO be heard on the
papers formerly read, the report Of, Com
missioner Thomas J. Evans, dated July 20,
1878, and filed september 3, 1878. The va
rI1ns ehrep9nS !nsTt d nT 10Y co.. .ne
couuts from year 10 year between Oud & Caring
tom trustees, under the deed Of October 20. 1870.
and the said trust estate up TO and including 18th Of
March. 1878, and the subsequent separate account
of SAID trustees settled by said commissioner and
turned on l7th May. 1879. and was argued by
counsel. TN consideration whereof. no exception
having been filed TO the said separate accounts Of
the transactions OF the said trustees with the trust
estate up 10 and including the account dated May,
II, 1879, and the Court approving The same, the
slid separate accounts are hereby confirmed. And
for reasons stated In writing and filed with the re-
cord, and made part thereof, the Court doth now
proceed 10 dispose OF the exceptions 10 the report
filed September 3. 1878, aud doth adjudgc, order,
and decree as follows:
l. The Court sustains the exception of the heirs
of Powhaian Roberts, and doth decide that the
judgment held by Beazeley's administrator Is not "A
lien on the one half OF the net proceeds Of the Dock
lot In Richmond, but tsat SAID one half belongs to
the estate of Powhstan Roberts, subject only 10 auy
claim thereon arising from the suretyship OF VIII
liam ii. Macfarland upon The bond OfP. X. Roberts
TO Ashn, "a set forth In the bill Ia this cause.
2. The Court doth oyerrule the exception OF Ould
& Carrlugton TO the ruling Of the Court in refer
ence 10 the mining rights In the county OF Gooch.,
land sold by the sait trustees 10 Thomas Dram, and
doth c0nhrm the report of The commissioner that
The judgment OF BeaZelcy's administrator Is a first
lien on The net proceeds OF said sale. And IL APP
pearlng from an examination OF The accounts afore
said that the net proceeds OF sale TO Thomas Dram
are the sum Of sl.0l657 rs of the 9th day Of May.
1874, aud that said fund forms part Of the fund
invested by the trustees. Ould & Car rinKton, II is
adjudged ordered, aud decreed that the said OnId 4
Carrington trustees, do collect sufficient amount
nf tho fund inVeSfpl by them 4nl do nay
William b. Weslbrook, administrator OF X. r..
Beaxeey, deceased, or 10 Mann Y. stringfellOw his
from The 9th day OF May. 1874. which payment
shall be credited upon the judgment Of BeIZeley's
adm nistrator mcfarland, mentioned In said
8. The Court doth sustain the exception Of RAN
doph Barksdale 10 said report and doth decide that
the claim OF said Randolph Barksdale against VII.
Ian, II. Macfarand shall be allowed to the extent OF
the sum of S7,l00, as OF the 18th OF June, 1852,
but that the same Is Confederate debt and is 10 be
scaled as of that date.
ance OF the claim or Peter W. Woodief, aud the ex-
ception Of +. ii. Smith 10 The allowance Of the same
claim, and also the exception OF The chdr Of VIII
liam II. Mcfarland aud wife, 10 the rejection OF the
claim OF the executors Of Andrew Bierne, are sus-
taned but to the extent only that the Court decides
that both OF said claims should he the subject of fur
Their inquiry aud report by the commissioner. with
leave to any party In interest 10 introduce further
testimony In respect thereto.
In all other respects the said report OF Commits
sloner Evans OF July 26, 1878, is hereby confirmed
And the Court doth adJudge, order. and decree
that the said report Is hereby recommitted 10 said
Commissioner Evans, who shall reform the same ac-
cording 10 the principles OF This decree.
And said commissioner shall specially inquire and
report 10 whom and In what proportions the one
half OF the net proceeds Of the Dock lot herenbe.
fore me ntioned shall be paid under The principles
hereinbefore decreed.
2. Whether tbs calm OF Woodef against Mac
fsrland has been paid In whole or In pari, and woat
II anything. Is due and owing on acc unit OF this
claim TO the said Peter w. woodlief and Francis II
Smith, respectively, or 10 either Of them.
3. What, II anything, Is due from the estate OF
William III. mcfarland on the claim asserted by the
executors OF Andrew Beirne. and set forth In the
petition Ia respect thereto. filed by some Of the chill
dren Of William II. mcfarland, aud 10 whom IL Il
due.
4. What, II anything, 10 due on the claim asserted
In the petition filed IN this cause by the deyisees OF
Philip 81. George Cooke.
The commissioner will coutinue the annual settle
ment Of The accounts Of The trustees.
The commissioner will report his proceedings.