Lancaster daily intelligencer. [volume] (Lancaster, Pa.) 1864-1928, 1880-11-13
COURT.

wac ulSshio5Cil a. IL. SUUIllhCl Sdlip
selection,
COURT.
Opinions Delivered by the Judges.
This morning court met at 10 o'clock.
Opinions in the following cases were de-
'lvc.cd
iIy Judge Livingston.
The board of prison inspectors of Ian
caster county VS.. Levi Weller, G. W.
Stycr. Alexander Gait, c. Showaiter, ct.
al. Rule to show cause why the record in
above cause should not be amended SO as
to read " The board of inspectors of the
Lancaster county prison VS.. Levi Senscnig
and Christian Musser, partners, trading as
Scnsenig {; Mu>ser," and all the names Of
the other defendants with the words part
ncrs trading as the New Holland company
store stricken off the record. Rule made
absolute.
Mary Ann K.cidcr by her next friend
David Cramer VS.. Amos Kreidcr. Rule to
show cause who .G. ia. should not bc set
aside. Rule discharged
The city of Lancaster VS.. the Pennsylva-
mia railroad. Rule to show cause why the
above cases should not be consolidated
into one at the plaintiff costs, and that the
cases be dismissed for want of jurisdiction
by the alderman, BY the opinion OF the
court. the exception to the jurisdiction of
the alderman is dismissed and tho cases
remain on the record. The court declined
to consolidate the said SUITS at the cost of
the plaintiff, in all the suits, according to
the terms of the rule, but order and direct
that of the said suits. from No. % to No
9S, both inclusive, shall be consolidated
and tried at one and the same time. as one
action, and that from No. 80 to No. 17G,
both inclusive. shall be consolidated and
tried at one and the same time as one
action.
David Kaufman VS.. The Reading &
Columbia railroad company, exceptions to
taxation of cost by the prothOnOtary.
Plaintiffs bill was corrected by striking
theIeiiom the sum paid to the original or
first viewers and the protlonotary's taxa
tiOn of the remaining portion of plaintiffs
bill Of cost was confirmed, sustaining the
exception with reference to the item thus
stricken out and dismissinS the remaining
exceptions.
East Earl township, appeal. excep-
tions to auditors report, exceptions
Overrulcd and report confirmed.
Moses Ober. VS.. William koser, rule to
show cause why the appeal should not be
stricken off. Rule discharged.
John Drace, deceased, exceptions to
auditors report. The part of the report
finding the fact of the death of Fanny
Myers and that payment should be made to
Fanny Mishlcr was confirmed and exccp-
tions to that part were dismissed. The
remainder of the report relative to inter-
est is rejected as surplusage.
Lewis Heptiny, deccased's estate, cxcep-
lions to auditors report Overrulcd and re-
port confirmed.
Martin Gross, dcceased's estate. Ex-
tions to auditors report. Ovcrruled and
report confirmed.
Isaac G. Smoker, deccased's estate. Ex-
ceptions to auditors report. Dismissed
and report confirmed.
Commonwealth VS.. VIM. A. Mcpherson,
embczzlemcnt, demurrer to indictment.
Demurrer sustained and Indictment
luashcd.
BY Judge Patterson.
o. p. Brubakcr, for the use Of the Honey
brook First National bank VS.. Perry Bru-
baker. Rule to show cause why an issue
should not be granted. Rule discharged.
Samuel W. kurtz VS.. David S. Miller
and Samuel II. Royer. Rule for new
trial discharged.
Henry NJ. Watts, Elizabeth Watts and
William NJ. Watts VS.. the Pennsylvania
railroad company. Rule to show cause
why Judgment of non suit should not bc
off. Rule discharged.
Christian Good, deceased's estate. Ex-
ceptiOns to auditors report. Dismissed and
report confirmed.
Samuel Barr, dcceased's estate. Excep-
tions to auditors report. Auditors fee
reduced to $35; the other exceptions dis
missed.
Jacob F. Roller, dcceascd's estate.
Ruse to show cause why sheriif's amended
return of service OF rule on heirs should
not be further amended. Also. cxcep-
tions to confirmation of sale Of real estate.
Rule discharged and exceptions to con-
firmation of sale sustained and sale set
aside.
Issues Granted.
An issue was granted between the Home
for Friendless Children for the City and
County of Lancaster VS.. the City Of Lam
caster and County of Lancaster, to ascer-
tain the amount Of damages, if any, sus-
tained by the Home 10y reason of the
opening of South Marshall street from
East King to Juniata street.
An issue was also awarded between Cath
lrine Kelly and The County Of Lancaster
20 ascertain the amount of damages sus-
aimed by Mrs. Kelly in the opening Of
[uniata street through her lands.
"A Novel Election Bet.