, 1880-02-14

'.''' n,eo W l.Iapec'or ilh'llnontl, OIL his
sccol'a 'lslt 10 Artzoi!ii, W'lltiIer he went by
ti'o order Of tho, Seerctary OF tho Interior
seilt O, th9 9th of June lust, while wns ul,.
nGs9.
The second case was much SIMMER IN
e|aracter than the, first, and was received by
tiS3ol, thS 9eo u, nboMt tls slt of July # coli;
tte government Ii! The rcceyitig nial weisi,.
tllg Of beef cattle BY Agcnt iiart, lis clerk s:i
Massey. nI!l tho partltGr Ut tic becf con
trartor. Thu, oiTellse consisted In Hart's
were Plight lea.l OH tic scaies, % Thereby itp IN.
cre!!siltE the average welglt ltb0l.t III Il ppr
cent, and, utter gOiMg through tu form Of
Wcls!!ing them ln t|nt manner, llnrt turned
tS c.ttl9 ~ recciye'l back Into ts ds of
| Into his possession tho cnttju weIrGci
| put not counted by Hurt. BY this ,l,cthod.
| IN = weekly delivery Of 1:n5 head 0t
eattle the tioyernllleiit wus probMhiy de-
rpsetap ls!sa t wtcs%S Sl % s 9Gss ft 1p q three
residents III Arizonl, and lie Oiitsu ,lcsifeI HUI
to llAvo tho Lcnc.tt III their testimony. and
therefore PrYparet! tht gase Immediately md
tl!e inferior Department, to tho Du,,ar.nismt
VI Justice. Thfs c:sse being complete, ail!i In
no. why connected with Tho iirst case $50 rg- q.
Geiyea. .4u n;nd n tho inds1ncMt Of competent
conviction could be casiiy oJtaiiie,i. Theroo ho
WIS therefore no ttelny necess,,ry, as Mi tie
evidences required III tic clso Wns II, i,osses.
sign q 9t tdo QIllcr, and WIS duly forwartleli.
IN inc first case received there werua Iurgcr
sspiracy with Hurt, md more specific III
10rinttos! WINS needed nn several points, mil
the ,reHnlslt information was not received
9!i.st! pec. 1877 wIlcn directed the ctssu 10
lnent OF Justice. Owing, howcyor, to Tie
pressure Of business atiI tho large calls far
information by Congress, every copyist was ms
cnEagcd IN copying Congressional matter,
rleted until Jun. I, 1851, when it was ft,r-
Wnrsctl through tie usual channel 10 liz
Department Of Jmstlce. Slicli is briefly
tho n,o history history q tic case Us Shown BY
y particle Of evidence produced to tie cn,,- -
trnry. Tllosef0re, tile conclusion nrriytHl nt
Dy tho Committee was not warranted by thH
Testimony. Tho punutty In b0tll cascs bcjng
wy tllat there was any iomivncy Shown 9 to
uart?
Sfco,ld-Tllo next point in the controversy
was rs to my Interest I might have II. tilo
tteo go outside of tho s,S sworIl a oyieee eG Go1 II
the ctse, md SUSPECT that n,ight have hatl
I'LL interest. Every Witness Win ro;,id knnw Mv
anything about tho matter testified positively
that had nc interest Whatoycr III tic sai1
fnyor md noi,ofv ngaofnet M E,.. !rE ~ NY
lad the Committee proposed to try tie cnso
,,nsei,ftv ffSe, nf tie, Hiole eoa.u 1'ay0 been no
v~rtiirt ~ - ,nn,,i;.Ss iS "ny otnar verdict than
,'ni IT, 'io X ~ IT, ihcsaMi III 9faer, however,
most extraordnnry proceedings ever hear,l
st,ntIi,, T. FIX ~. 4eyGc dlu inject
r. II h, 'ltso tao,i E,o eMse tlI uia 1lot belong
l'n,i Ioon ~ ,1!as ,esLlsomI !rom ulo beginning
the presence of NY counsel, Alessfs. Shrl1a.
Jhil. ~, IN the afternoon, without notice to |
n!Y counsel Or lnysrlf; the Committee held
piLaSan pails..a lhtefivleW WIN u witness who had
Miaeauy . lestletl, and as result Of thGt lntcr-
VIEWING y!eW ING pAsns til the testimony numbering
ns,!s oesMteh twentY.seyen aud thfrty-two wero
u oiAtlMcteu if1tn tho direct evidence nnd du-
ssLIg;Y}ett, Wnlia two pagcs were inserted con-
Iraulcttng the evidences Alreaty given, and
ieW latser was Injected wItl,0llt permitting
tle poSSlblilty OF Il crosl'oXAlnlnNtton. The I