Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1880-05-31
THE OOURTs.
SUPREME COURT.


FRIDAY, May 2sth.
In BdnF
IO,515-Ex parte Denis Kearney, on habeas cor
pusIt IS ordered that the petitioner be and be is
hereby discharged.
Department No. I.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
Mckiustry, j., presiding Mckee, J.; Ross, j.;
Frank W. Gross, Clerk Henry c. Finkler, Bailiff
7038 Reclamation District No. 124 vs.. A j. Cog
h--On motion OF Hart, ordered that appellant
have one week further time in which to file tran
scrrt.
1850 Sacramento and Pacervie Railroad Com
pany vs. Superior Court of San Francisco-By order
Of Chief Justice Morrison this cause is set Tor hear
ing before the Court in bank in San Francisco on
Monday, July 26, 1880.
6571-Wright VS.. Longenour On motion of
Belcher and by consent, is ordered that this
be placed on the calendar for to morrow.
Nelson vs. McClanahan- Argument concluded by
Catlin for respondent and, cause submitted
6404-Parks VS.. Barney Argued by Treadweil for
respondent and Lambert for appellant, and sub
mitted.
711o Palmer vs. Barney-No one appearing for
appellant any points and authorities filed in his
behalf, the Judgment is affirmed.
6l05-Grum vs. Barney Ordered that Armstrong,
for appellant, be allowed to file additional brief.
e562-In the matter of the application of Baker
& Hamilton-Argued by Cadwalader for appellant
and Treadwell for respondent, and submitted
7o43 Harlan ct al. VS.. Ely-Argued by Armstrong
for appellant, and pending argument the Court ad-
journed.
Adjourned until tomorrow morning at 10 oclc ck
Department No. 2.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present
Thornton, j., presiding; Myriek, j.; Sharpstein,
j.; c. N. Post, Deputy Clerk Perrie Kewen, Bailiff
70S0-Carey VS.. Brown-Continued until Noyem-
Der calendar.
Gi47-Elliott vs.. Wohlfrom Argued BY Sprague
for appellant and Welty for respondent, and sub
mitted.
1882 People W. Jose Marie Alviso and Paeheco
Aviso Judgment and order affirmed Myrick, j.;
Sharpsteiu, j., Thornton, j., concurring.
Adjourned until tomorrow morning at 10 o'clock.
SATURDAY, May 10th.
Department No. l.
Court met pursuant to adjournment Present,
McKinstry, j., presiding Mckee, j.; Ross, j.;
Frank W. Gross, Clerk Henry C. Finkler, BailiR
7o43-Harlan VS.. Ey-Argued by Armstrong r
appellant and heKune for respondent, and sub
mitted.
6O67- People vs. Gardner-Argued by Dunlap for
appellant and Edgerton for respondent and sub
mitted.
6455-Pcople vs.. Mshoney Argued by Cadwala-
der FOR appellant and Dunlap for respondent, and
submitted.
6525-henken VS. Belmer ct al-Argued by Tay.
lor for appellant and Freeman for respondent, and
judgment affirmed.
6571-Wrght vs. Longenour-Argued by Haml
ton for appel INT and Treadwel and W. c. Belcher
for respondent and submitted with ten days each
wherein to file briefs.
Adjourned TO Tuesday morning at 10 o'clock.
Department No. 2.
Court met pursuant to adjournment. Present
Thornton. j., presiding: Myrick, j.: SharIsten,
j.: C n. Post, Deputy Clerk Perrie Kewen BaIT
602i-Bronner vs. Wetziar - Cause submitted
with thirty days to respondent 20 file brief ard ten
days to appellant to reply.
6493-Nathan IS. Doane-Argued by MeKune for
appellant and Naphtaly for respondent, and sub
ntted
65ls-Chester VS.. Bower Judgment affirmed.
Iyrick. j.; Sharpstein, j., Thornton, J concurring
10,522-Psople VS.. Reuben J. Observation-Disclosures
and order reversed and cause reaianded for a nes
trial. Morrison, C. j.; Ayrick, j., Sharpstein, J.,
eoacurring
7t51-Cox & Clark vs. Superior Court OF Lassen
county-Application denied and restraining order
granted hers vacated Sharpstein, j.; Thornton
j., Myrick, j., concurring.