Daily Los Angeles herald. [microfilm reel] (Los Angeles [Calif.]) 1876-1884, 1880-10-12
which Price Averred that New Eng
land was opposed to any diecrimi-
ton against the Chinese.
A WORD FOR MR.. LEACH

tiOu uBhiuub tu6 Ouiucccs
A WORD FOR MR.. LEACH.
There are three candidates for
Congress in this district. We do
not always expect to get the men
nominated that we would prefer to
vote for, but this is not a time to
allow such feelings to influence US.
The Democratic of this district cam
not afford to vote for any other
than the Democratic nominee. It
10 due to our next President that
We have u Democratic Congress
during the next four years. We
want Congress In accord with the
Democratic party. If you have q
Republican Congress you cripple
the administration, and I earnestly
appeal to the Democrats Of this
district to stand by the nominee,
notwithstanding he may not come
up to your standard of morals in
oil respects. There is hope for him
yet.
"While the lamp holds out to burn
The viiest sinner may return"
We expect to elect three out of
the four Congressman, and may
possibly elect all four. l believe
we can elect Mr.. Leach. 1 know
Mr.. Pacheco. Personally 1 am his
friend. We have been friends for
years. Our social relations have
always been pleasant, but at this
time we can't afford to have Mr..
Pacheco elected. If you are Demo-
Gratis you will do all you can for
the Democratic candidate.
Voice-Isu't Godfrey as good q
Democrat as Leach?
1 don't know Mr.. Godfrey. lam
told he Is man very much re-
spected by all who know him; he
may be as good or even q better
man than either of the others, but
there is no more show to elect him
than there Is to elect any one who
Is not o candidate.
VOice-Why not2
Because Pachsco will get the Re-
publican vote and Leach will get
the Democratic vote.
CONCLUSION.
After briefly referring to the i'm.
portance of electing n Democratic
Legislature, Senator Farley ex-
planned the action of Pacheco on
the appropriation bill, in which an
appropriation for Wilmington har-
bof had been omitted in the House.
Mr.. Farley, in the Senate, had it
inserted at $35 900, and the House
concurred in the amend.
ment. Mr.. Pacheco said it
was an oversight of the
committee. In Mr.. Farley's
opinion, however, it was such an
oversight as should not have oc-
Cured. Concerning the bill abol-
ishing the port OF entry at San Di-
ego and establishing Que at Will
mington. prepared by Mr.. Pacheco,
Mr.. Farley said he drew u
new bin, retaining San Diego.
and making u new port at Viii.
mington; but although the bill
passed the Senate it was not called
up in the House. The Speaker,
Mr.. Randall, said he was ready to
recognize Mr.. Pacheco. but neither
Pacheco nor Page could be found,
both being absent, and the bill was
never reached. Mr.. Farley prom
ised, however, that it shall be pass
ed at the next session.
AS fine Senator concluded three
hearty cheers were given in his
honor.
DIR. WozENCgAFT
Hoped there might be some Re-
publicans present, as he had some.
thing to say to them. He asserted
that the leaders of the Republican
party are taking course which
must, if they ret ain power, re-
suit in the destruction of our
present form of government. He
went on to aubstantiate his asser-
ton by proof. He showed that they
are rapidly tending towards cen.
tralization, aud yet the macs Of the
party are SO blind that they cannot
see the danger.
The Doctor continued until the
crowd, becoming uncomfortable in
the cold, raw wind, began to thin
out, when he excused hii2sel and
retired. The meeting was very
effective one, deep impression be-
ing made, aud the result will b. II
more harmonious action from now
l..