Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1880-11-03

Senate amendment coneurred inH. 49, an act in rela.
Ton to morgages o. personal property having been passed
~ concurrence WIN proposal Of amendment which was
ta, the properly morteaged cannot removed from
state without the consent Of both motgagor and mort
= Repons,-rrom the com. on claims, by Mr.. HARVEY OF
rutland 1aona bsnk o 20 80 @
In the arrest Of William Charles Brown.
the reasons why there was so large a sum ,epor,ed.
the bank for catching @ Seaana seT lie aid hat he
state had received $3.50 In money FROM Browns ball and
NJ mAPGooD Of Peru moved to amend so a. to make
40 as to include the $500 reward paid by the
Mr. HARVEY OF Torsham and Mr., Leavens defended the
Mr. cuRRiER Of Norwich thought the amount allowed
Wa A Ge hn S wS 9 no be sS S0S Mr.
The question ~ the adoption Of amendment, being put
the chair was In doubt and count was called for Pend
stand this bill before decided In the pursuit
criminal the state had not been put TO any expenses what
which properly chageabe the state. The had
pense About 500 Of ibis bali would 20 to the ofcer and
not TO The bank u the ~ passed Ne state would sl ee
mSpey aIS AZ no oe E, any q DE ssDsP's
$500 for the officers fees etc made up II seemed
Mr. PAGE moved that the bill be ordered lie. that
the items might be examined
M pgud What S was paid to the
Mr. HARVEY explained. and after some further discus
BuTTEkfiEID Of whiinehan to repeal the insolvency
OF the Judiciary and favoraby to by minority and
pending the question OF whether should be ordered
was ordered to lie and made the special order for three
o'clock this afternoon. was taken from the table.
OF the bill lie claimed that nsolven law
necessary In Vermont enabled dishonest to evade
Mr. FIFiEID said that the abolition Of the insoven, law
rel gated us 10 the OF the old attachment law, which
ahed the most vgant creditor to attach all mans prop
ey and prevented the other creditors from getting any
and nlso placed nsurmountable obslce TO young
man who had failed by misfortune from ever Strengthening
y M Sf% s na nb a9s a 8 s od a% an
al mans property before Judgment when perhaps the
just way Of distributing the property Of sman matte to
pay his debts his creditors. 1t copy the
for about half century The national bankrupt law was
repealed because expensive and because the time for
Mr. HARVEY Of iopsham was for the repeal If the bill
II should be eaed Tor the reason that the people OF Yer
and unjust, and premium on dishonesty,
Mr.. ROWE of Ludlow said that the lnaolvent law was
cheap and efficient aud speedy OF settling bank
rupt estates lie hoped would be allowed 10 stay on the
statute hook As manufacturer, he preferred to sell
then all the creditors could In and alike
regardless o. priority Of attachment
things that could happen TO the people Of this state would
be the repeal of the Insolvency law. He explained the
operation Of the grab law" which would come force
II the Insolvency law repealed and showed how cred
ios might be defrauded by cousion between the debtor
shared alike Under the grab law neighhoring creditors
could attach rst and far away creditors couldn't get
law both good and cheap 1t enables
unfortunate to start again Tree from the yoke of in
Mr. FACE of Rutland thought that such legislation ought
TO be such will uphold business enterprise and be thought
II this law repealed that the business could OF
live He said he knew OF where business had
BY suits brought and property attached
On motion OF Mr.. BRIGGS of Brandon, adjourned.