The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1880-05-06
DECISIONS
by The Court of Appeais-Austin
Term.
Galveston News.

Term.
"oie9'on -'o"a'
Henry LoRglhs vs. me STATE hppva
from AUSTIN county Inc provision Ill th'
code that the iact oil presehtmehl Oh nm lh'
dicLmeht SNAIL DO entered upon 1ne il't.u y.
OF the COURT hou'hg ofiehy tne sty,c Vi tns
aclon, ana inc ME NUMBER OF tne lllu,c t.leh'
put omit!ing tne name OF lhe de,epuail'' u,l-
less hels III CUSTODY ofuhoer poha' Gun haIu,y
90 construed rs Imperative ana aosolutely
Indispensable 70 the validity OF allsuoseqe,'h'
proceedings. Inc design IS 70 reSulme "
matter OF prsciice, una not 10 lllrnisu "il ga
elusive 'est py wEich tho autheh'lc,N Oh IN
indictment must 90 esiapilshed' ~ IL Is ue,
sirca 70 put ID issue me authehuei'y oi a'
ihuiclunen' IL can ohly no uohc py ihouon'
IN inc nature Oh suggestion 10 the COURT
tnat tnere Is ho ihuictnient Oh me, which
noiioh ihny 10 ue1etiriii W MI inspection
oil the paper purportng 10 be al Indictment
Op)ecuons 70 'he minutes OF the court Tor lr'
regulariues come 100 iate after change
Oh venue 70 another county. Evidence
was ADMITTED over the oolec'ioh OF de-
Iehdahl' OF ucciarauons maue oy heuDen
Loggihs, isther OF defendant, ana jointly m
Diced WIN MN Tor murder; but not on trial
10 inc erect that some DAYS before tne homl'
eiue heuoon hpsS'hs lau declared mat the
deceased was 'he cause OF the death OF MS
son Ihoihns LossluS' Nv llio hahus OF Dah
motifs, anu ln", thc deceased ought TO uie
anu must oe' nelu, 'h"t 'he defendant not
Deing present ana no conspiracy having been
SHOWN Tue evidence was Improperly admit
yea ~ conspiracy IKE ule CRIME Is suseepu-
oie OF PROOF by circumstances which are
addressed to Tue trlai luase IN Inc ilrst IN
stance when called TO rule upon the compe-
enIs ", ane ov W anu ter tne ac.s OF
aro odn';tta1 IN or;J"npo wa nv' upon .''"'
q, ,h' ~ w ",,', wy e',uo"ru Us
wy eVp''"V !, uo' S'i,o'uI'se, .nu quts
n aon snou'u 10 suun','lou W tle jury WIN
an w oh"iu s'I'' o'luuny1 al S"so
. .ho o'nSpnaVy n"u no! ocoh estapl'sheu 10
snor Sns' s. Niueice was admitted
so, EoloeuJn ~ n ,uo uooiAi"t'on " neuoei'
a. s1lnwa , "p !, inu osu,'o " 9,,onua,i'
Soa ,u'oTs neuoen h,orr'S Sauseu NY son
uoa'n, ! salu no sno9,u go Geuu' una now
ment did nat nroncr,v csil far resnonse
from tho defendant and the oviIonce Nas inn.
nroner Reversed md ren,onJed onin;on
bv Ozark I f''''''
CHARLEY Howard We the State Annual
from Collin county AnnelIont heiag on
trial for thoCt nleado1 fnrn1dr consic,;one . u
sol out in lis nIea indgn,ont conr; n, %'C,
him Of burglary II anneaIs thnt after en,or'
inc ,he bnnse he conn,it,ed ,ho of,oso ~
theft If nronertv ovar tyentv do,lars In
The indi tment far the BURGLARY the thoft was
moi alIo,ed Uold ibot Ia Moo ,,noso,,oJ
No bar 10 ths nrosccmtior ArIicie 7Io p y
,clearlv authdri2ea nm ind;ctmnnt r,r ,So
BURGLARY md separate ;ndict,nont tnr the
tbnR a n;rmed Whit p / ~ '''N
-
henry v. h Az vs. Ille ola'e' Appeal
rom lra.ls' NV appeilHh' was ma etel LOT
forgery, Tue inssruuielis nileseu 10 Dc Forged
oeins .he 'eisliV 3 VI .lo'"'y RuoI'c 10 II
.ia,lslel vi ''l9 ee'',nSa'e' held' tha'
uhuIr WY raw IN aorIu w 'He 'lli'e tue o1ense
Is mleseu " na'o Veen eohllnlt'eu, (io'o)
lhis was ho' sucn an instrument IN wiring
ns was ,; uon'en,Pih'eu oy Tue statute ana that
INC inui..nicn' uoes nov chHfSe any onense
, agalhs' tno 'aw' reversed ana dismissed
Sihrh, o.
X. Il. Hatch vs. the State. Appeal from
Travis. This is an appeal from judgment
convictng appellant of forgery. In the
closing argument the counsel for the State
INDUCED in the following language; "The
truth u, gentlemen of the Jury, that the
'defenddant Hatch signed the name of
aGeo. w. jenkins to this transfer in pencil,
which has been traced in ink by some other
person since" and then counsel proceeded
;after ground for above bill had been taken
and granted; "Yes, take your bill, and as
: often as this case is taken 10 the Court of
Appeals, and there reversed on some foolish.
ness or technicalitv, will rs often on new
ariai as l can get the case before twelve hon
Sss men, convict him again and again. "
iheh ADDED as follows: II mean TO deal with
these Fellows, and commence with this one,
Una, when they know themselves to be
guilty, ana when they, as has this defendant,
Deen once larry convicted by twelve honest
men, and by dodge, and tecbnicality had