Morning journal and courier., 1880-01-09
LOCAL NEWS.
Tor other Local News see secondsPage,l

TcorrrNUED FROM SECOND PAGE.
 O.-Didn't he say there he didn't get any liuuor Tuesday because there was none to have? A-No, sir.
 O.-Recolect that he said that when Hay den drove up he was sitting on the bed A. No, sir; think he said something about sitting on a bed, but he did say he had talk with MT. Hayden out in the front yard Witness was asked various questions to test his memo " of other points of Stevens testimony
 Witness-I might have read Benjamin Stevens evidence in the paper took. did not calculate to read all of the trial I read some or it. can't say that I read Stevens testimony. Can't say that l read anything about lumber.
 Q.-When did you get this Stevens testi- mony about lumber into your head A. When Stevens testified so. CNext witness called on same point.
 MT. Waller gave notice that the State would put on just as many witnesses to testify that no such testimony was given so the defense could act accordingly, and not have this thing flow on forever.
 MT. Watrous understood that the State had had its say aud was legally precluded from such an operation.
 Mr. Waller said he would wrestle with the question at the proper time.
 Mr. Watrous said he had no doubt the State could duplicate witnesses in some way, for that was the inference from the suggestion.
 The SGIck-MOre i'm RebuttaI.
 Charles E. Jackson to Mir. Hubbard-Went up to the scene of the homicide with MT. BunnelL He did not take stick and poke it in the pool of blood at all. If he had should have seen it, as was with him all the time. Bunnell and I were never at the scene of the homicide but once. No, sir. While on the way to the ground, and while at the Stannard house, Mrs. Dowd and her said party did not come along at all. After being at the spot half an hour we returned. Bunnel had not been out of my sight. After our return and stop at the Stannard house we saw MT. Giles Dow and MT. Davis. They came to us as we stood at the fence. That was the first time we had seen them after leaving them at the Stevens store. We then went to the funeral at the church. Buunell leaving me short time to go to Mir. Hayden's house.
 To Mir. Waller-They must have claimed that they were with us at the blood spot l; they could not have known any other way. We had no acquaintance with them. Yes, Bunnell had a cane with him he did not poke it in the blood. Bunnell did not so tes- tify TMr Watrous and Mir. Jones said, Oh, Mir. Waller, you don't think Bunnell said any thing of the sort, do you. MT. Waller said he did think so and referred to the steno- grapher Witness-If he had poked into the blood spot should have seen him, for was with him all the time. will swear it.
 StenOgraphfc.
 To Mir. Jones-The Dowd-Davis party might have known that we were going to the spot.
 Witness excused temporarily for time to examine steEographic notes as to what Bun nell did say. Notes looked at and fragments read. No testimony about poking the cane into the blood was reported. To save time, and pending further quest among the notes, lVal Toko found that the notes did not say so.
 George Bunnel To MT. Hubbard-Re- counted the excursion to the blood spot with previous witness
 Q.-What did you say at your previous ex- animation about the blood spot examination you made? Al said made an examina- tion of the spot I took my thumb and finger and turned over piece of sod in the spot. There was very little blood adhered.
 Q.-Did you testify before, sir, that you used stick CT anything else to poke it in the blood? Al did not.
 Q.-Nor attempt to do 1t? Al did not do anything of the kind No, sir; never have been there before or since. A Collision of Witnesss s--Lively Pros
 To Mir. Waller-No, sir; I didn't testify anything about using cane. never made any such remark as here's where the blood has gone to. Frank Bishop was not there. l Bhlu uO BuCu lDluR LO u1Ll UT duyDOUY 6lSG. know Wm. Bishop and Frank Bishop and MT. Dowd and the last witness. We were not there at the same time MT. Davis came to my house. Smith is my son-in-law. He don't call me so; wouldn't take any pride if he did. Great amusement.
 Civilian Smith is 8 man who don't call you father? A.-Yes, sir; and shouldn't feel proud if he did More laughter. Witness went on to explain, and the counsel in good hunor permitted quite wordy ex- plantation about persons and things. In winding up, witness and court were startled to hear @ voice from the rear in the witness seats exclaiming 'tNo such thing!" TRoars of merriment
 Mir. Watrous-A fire in the rear; it isn't loaded. More laughter.]
 Q.-Wm. Smith you still insist wasn't there? A.-No sir.
 Q.--Aud he is your son-in-law? A.-Yes, sir. No, sir; said he didn't call me father, and I shouldn't be proud if he did.
 More Flat Contradictions.
 George T. BunneD.-Am 8 son of last wit ness; I went up to the funeral with Jackson, Dowd and others; we all remained at the store while Jackson and father went up to the spot where the body was found; later we went up to the spot, me and Davis, Dowd and Smith while we were there father nor Jackson nor Talcott Davis were there so they didn't make any examination with cane while we were there; we didn't see father
  noon none of them in my presence saw my father up at the scene of the homicide.
 To MT. Wsller.-No, sir, I offered father the crackers not up in the woods, but down at the church, outside.the church; he declined as he was not hungry.
 Q.-Didn't your brother-in-law Smith see him up in the woods when you were there A.-No, sir.
 Q.-He says he did. A-Well, I don't care if he did; know he didn't. CLaughter.)
 Q.-You know he wasn't there when your father was2 A.-Yes, I do. know it be- cause he was along with me and wasn't there when father was, (Lsughter.) RcccSs--The Oyster Supper--StrOng Tes-
 ttm0ny for the Defense.
 MT. Lowell Johnson was called for by Mir. Hubbard. Not present.
 Mrs. Norman Scranton, an elderly lady of nice matronly appearance, called. To Mir. Hubbard-I was present at the oyster supper in March, 1878. Went up from my home at South Madison to attend it. I left my cloak and shawl at MT. Hayden's house and walked up with Mrs. Hayden. I came up from South Madison at invitation of MT. Hayden. He went home at request of his wife to put the children to bed. It was about 9 o'clock.
 Q.-Did you hear the conversation about putting the children to bed ? A. did. heard put the children to bed. MT. and Mrs Hay den were in the front room of the parsonage, where the supper was.
 MT. Waller-What's this for?
 Mir. Jones (decidedly)-He didn't go but once to his house; this is to tell when that once was.
 MT. Hubbard-Did you see him as he re- turned2 Al did, sir.
 Q.-How long should you judge was he gone2 A-Not to exceed-ten minutes.
 Q.-Is there any particular circumstance by which you noticed how long he was gone or when he returned Ally little boy asked me for some money. I was there at the sup per as an invited guest, and as I didn't pay for supper I wished to spend little money I found had left my pocketbook at home. was looking anxiously for MT. Hayden to come in as wished to borrow small sum. saw him come in in about 10 minutes. Q.-Did you see MT. Hayden any more af- ter that ? A.-Yes, in the front room up stairs and in the kitchen, and after it was over we walked home together, myself, Mr. Hayden and his wife.
 Q-Did you see MT. Hayden in the neigh borhood of Il o'clock. Al did, sir.
 Q.-Where Al saw him upstairs.
 Q.-In what room? An the front Q-How happened it AT went to see my if little boy was tired and wanted to go