Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1880-10-27

the reconsideration as TO make amendments he
h RiI y Ps Wiling a che suss
no, ,grstsii9usly 70 put any more money Into H.
TO adopt an amendment similar to the that now
10 o5 DE made n, vote were The
hands % discreet committee.
PREVAIL that was unprecedented for the state pay
MI. Brown Of Grand Isle hoped the motion would no,
prevail and that the house ought TO supplement the efforts
Mr. BufiERfiELD said that number had spoken to
@ About sh. matter and s, shough they voted for The
TO say i,ie SeIp eq they sh2pid o,. IN
luton ms morning. SSs thai Il Sns one wsm,e % a " sSo
amendments they should have the chance.
Mr. sNTi Of 81. JohnsDaIy hoped that The resolution
e discreet WIG coad trusted me hives.
on S9n Ps Ta Ss as Y ito, too Esa'
as 5 s S s Sssys hs as NE S"s not s
TO charge the state with any such expense
Mr. HOWE Of Ludlow moved TO amend the resolution by
he eoadn be ssdded upon The state Il the som
Mr. .PAGE q Rutland aid that the committee could
limit The number OF witnesses 70 be summoned At the
hey wanted 70 Ms interest his subject was caused By
epdon BY his wish TO ses fair play for the remcnsrants
lie ei hopesI ne ne amendment would not prevail;
withdraw Ms motion TO amend, by unanimous consenV
Whereby he hSne @ % 81 The
Harvey on Iopshan which provided that the committee
| Mr.. PALMER Of Waterbury asked how many witnesses
wo @ 70 III % sys The es Se n not too many
frS% EISSd sa ~ gnG ipa.sasdb .no.s
reconsider on the ground hat his was an Important
and SHOULD be settled TIE sie was u
cOS 1 n y 81 ss pas s s
waste he UNDERWOOD ihs the parties p Wv WE'RE
hearing e1uld g on without Ii1s, much EXPENSE
said that committee had been informed by counsel ,hs
they would nays ,wey witnesses II te opening and the
would need there telling where the thing would
end IL the house wanted full investigation. regardless
Of expense he wanted an expression OF opinion to that
sumcd by The state ba he believed that the house night
Be- om Se BE s ss
maintain the purity Of elections. Public interest required
MIR. HuRBARD OF Plymouth favored the motion to re-
should be assumed by the state VI WIS u''''''
M BRIGGS Of Brandon took Just the opposite view He
greater interest In question than the Of Car
endon The maintenance Of the purity Of election Of
the greatest Importance to the state, and the state could
wei "na ,t in ni esPe rs ...... ri.
arguments, and called for u count
| The motion to reconsider was then lost by vote OF 8
The State Prntag-Mr. PAGE of Rutland In behalf of
tee had investigated the causes of the delay in the pubca
no% in ean and the ' nomaon Which eSay nad
learned as TO the OF delay had led the committee
stationery. The bill read and ordered . is
the documents and books which included the
state printing by the act of 1875 dockets including
blank dockets for the Judges clerks jury calendars
entry docke. IL provides that the governor gov
ernorelec procure the printing OF his hs
general assembly, To number not exceeding thousand
copies Of such person he proper prcs
does not exceed the contract paid by
the size of the in the house and bills
directory addresses essays reports of legislative commit
tees court dockets, etc. at six and theefourths nche
In length and four and oneeighth inches in width The
type used in the journals and laws shall be Ion.
primer loaded with six o-pca leads in the reading
ter OF the state officers reports. registration report,
the report of the state superintendent of education, thu
type shall be small plea, loaded with hree-topca
and the type for the tables OF said reports shall be long
primer solid talf titles being excluded; but sub report
and extracts from authors occurring In the body Of
set In as compact form the page will admit withou
unnecessary blank space The bill makes mportan
changes in regard TO the prompt delivery Of copy tn,
part of the state officers 1t "a made the duty of each
officer To have his report in readiness and deposited with
the secretary of state for printing before the 5h
August In the legislative with ten days unde
certain clrcumsiances) and the printers shall have thu
work ready before the 25th Of september for
days delay the printer shall forfeit per OF the az
gregate price In other respects the bill does differ
| essentially from the act of ls7s.l
Mr. TAFT of Burlington moved reconsideration of tn
vote by which the house refused third reading to H. a.
amend the pauper law. and the motion laid upon tn
table and made the special order for Tuesday after
| noon at half past two O'Clock.
On motion Of Mr. FARNIAM of West Fairiee. adjourned