The Cincinnati daily star. [volume] ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) 1875-1880, 1880-01-19
COMMON PLEAS.

lOlOWSs
COMMON PLEAS.
Before Judge Smith. ....
5S,NS-Margaret Krebs vs.. Joseph Lowenstein.
5S256-John Malloy ct a. VS.. VIM. rang.
3d. 3286-Wm. Strang Va. John Malloy & Co.
53288-Same VS.. T. +. Ryan.
53,332-Lena Tanszky VS.. W. G. Mccoy ct al.
b3.360-Lorenz Ziegler VS.. VIM. Mund.
53,3S6-Caroline Gwinner administrative, vs.
John Schmidt ct al.
53,424-Matthew Lehan vs.. the city.
Before Judge Longworth.
55O3-Rosina Deck vs.. Elizabeth Heiger ct al.
65,7G-John Deck, Jr., VS.. same.
3D. 7S2-James G. Armstrong VS.. Hallenbeck 4
Brother.
IS. 5.7S4-charles c. Carey, Receiver, vs. W. G.
Mccoy.
55,7S6-same VS.. W. G. Mccoy ct al.
55SOa Matthias Hermann VS. Alexander Gobil.
las et al.
55,sss-Philip Klopp vs. Geo. W. Ritter.
55,S46-Losekamp 4 Krulle VS.. Theo. Scho-
m acker.
55,S5S-Peter Gibson VS.. T. W. Helmick.
55,866-J. d II. Glaskens VS.. j. II. Reynolds.
90 5S68-Hoeffinghoff Lane VS.. George D. Win
55sD-Harnon P. Lewis VS.. Roberts. Hamil.
ton ct al.
55S73-Hide, Leather and Betting Company OF
Indiana vs. N. Wolfstein 4 Co,
55S9S-John M. Cramer VS. Thomas Burke.
55934-Columbia & New Richmond Turnpike
s~AA~ AtAN6o NViapduy Vns CtcfcA lutu
SUPERIOR.
Before Judge Force.
"a. .527-H. P. Lloyd assignee, VS.. Osman Sellew
A,52s-Reinhold Won Minden VS.. Adolph
Seinccke ct al.
s4,5S2-J. L. Keck & Co. vs. John Ragan.
34557-G. I. Hunterman VS.. J. f. Floyd, execu-
tor.
,a,559-state National Bank of Mem phis vsA, J.
Vaughan & Co. ct al
si,563-Geo. Veedman VS.. H. Linderman, ad-
ministrator.
457l-Mana Kirman vs.. D. Humphreys ct al.
G. i. Martin & Sons
34,5N--Margaret R. Poor VS.. Sarah scanlan ct al.
36l7-Mary J. Cowen VS.. An hony schlauser
sl,6,a-Elizabeth L. Potter VS.. William Car.
. 34,636-John Quinn VS., John Beckett.
"a, ,G31-Thos. White VS.. Same
&64G-Ihe Wildey Building Association, No. 2,
VS.. Viola Morten.
Before Judge Harmon.
&,0S6-The Enterprise Fire and Marine ms Co.
VS.. VIM. 8. Munson ct al
34.040-Brldget O'Brien vs. John Beckett.
S4,0o2-Administrators of Michael Henry vs. The
Cincinnati Ice Co.
$4,Oss--Widows' and Orphans Beneficial Associ-
alton Of Improved Order Red Men vs. VIM. H.
Brickel ct al.
Before Judge Foraker
34,139-Michael Werk VS.. We'll, Kahn & Co.
35,22-Jas. P. Patton, administrator vs.. Robert
Creighton.
S5,265-John L. stettinius VS.. John Gibson.
S5,s77-George c. Berry vs. The Cincinnati Rail-
way Tunnel Co.
s5,293-Hugh McCullum VS.. J. L. Burdsall &
Co.
a5,SO1-Executors of J. H. Luhn VS.. Peter Evers-
man.
COMMON PLEAS.
On Saturday Judge Smith overruled the
motions made by J. w. Sibley & Co., for
new trial and for a judgment notwlth-
standing the verdict of the jury and sus-
tanned the verdict in the case of P. O'Con-
nell against J. w. Sibley q Co., No. 81, ,956.
The suit was brought to recover the value
of As barrels of -four, alleged to be owned
by O'Connell, and which Sibley g. Co. had
sold and converted t, their use in Octo-
Der, 1876. without his knowledge and con-
sent Sibley & Co. claimed that one Elstner
was co-partner with OConnel, and had
authorized them to hold the -four in pledge
to secure tbereas margins OH grain trades
in Chicago. OCOnnell denied the partner
ship and all knowledge of the speculations.
In February, 1875, the case vas tried before
Thomas Evitt Justice OF the Peace, and
judgment given in favor of O'Connell.
From this decision Sibley & Co. appealed
to the Common Pleas Court, and on 'last
Wednesday and Thursday the case was
tried before jury and a verdict rendered
in favor of OConnell for the value of the
flour, $243. and interests in all $2S9 80 and
costs of suit thus affirming the judgment
of the Justice of the Peace. Hollister &
Roberts attorneys for O'Connell Sayler &
Savlpr aftoruava fnr Sihlav a. ~