The Cincinnati daily star. [volume] ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) 1875-1880, 1880-02-03
LEGAL.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE
~ subscriber has been duly appointed and quail
flied as Administrator on the estate of E c. +.
Dated at Cincinnati this Goth day OF January.
A. D. 1880. WILLIAM H. POWELL Admir-.
HOWARD DOUGLASS, Attorney. ia2o-4tTu
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE UN.
IN derNgned has been qualified as Assignee of
John L. Bowman. Creditors are notified to pre-
sent their claims within the time prescribed by
law. HOWARD DOUGLASS,
ja204tTu Assignee.
N duly appo nted administrator Of the estate
Of Michael Mann. late Of Hamilton County, Ohio.
deceased. ANDREW MANN.
Crosby Township. Hamilton County, Ohio.
HoLIIsTER 4 RoBERTs. Attorneys
Janua y 26th, 1880. ja2zstTu
/ estate of E. c. f. Voules, deceased, consisting
Of watch and chain, sleeve buttons, clothing and
other property. win be sold at public aucti0n ct
No. 20 West Sixth street, Cincinnati, Ohio. on
Monday the 10th dsy & Of February, H ,s A. 1850 $50
will continue from day to day thereafter until
WILLIAM H. POWELL, Admir-
HOWARD DOUGLASS. Attorney. jaf98tTu
NOTICE OF lkSOLvENCY.-ON THIS 10th
~ day Of January, in the year 1880, the Probate
Court in and for the County Of Hamilton. and
Burk, deceased to be probabl insolvent. Credi-
tors are therefore required TO present their claims
against the estate To the undersigned for allow.
ance Within six months from the time above
mentioned. or they will not BE- entitled 70 psy.
ment. JOHN ttREIZ,
Admir- of L. NJ. Burk, deceased.
HoLLIsTER ROBERTS. Atpya ia06tTq
TATE OF OHIO. HAMILTON COUNTY,
y Common Pleas Court--No. 60,97O Henrietta
Hnfetz, Plaintiff, against James 7 Cshill, Defend
Of Free Will, County of Osborne, and state Of
ant is hereby notified that the plaintiff. Hen
ric, ia Kruetz, did, on the 18th day of December,
A. D. 1870, file her petition with the Clera of the
Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County,
Ohio, against James T. Csnill, setting forth that
on the I'd day of May, A. D; 1877, he made and
delivered unit this plaintiff his certain notes, one
for the sum Of eight hundred doiiais, ana two
notes for the sum of frty dollars each, payable in
six and twelve month after date. the same being
secured by mortgage on the following real estate,
| to-wit
Being Lot No. s, and described as follows: Be-
ginning at point In the south line of the origin
al thirty acre tract OF james Cahll. four hundred
and eight forty-two one hundredths (4OS 42:lO0)
feet east of the west line of section six: thence
north % 0V east, six hundred and sixty.twO hun.
dredths feet to The center of Warsaw Pike; thence
along the center of said pike, south $50 IA east
ninety eighty one-hundredths feet; thence
nOrtn o. " Wc5t uiucty y-ScVeu nILy Onc-Hun-
dredths feet to the place OF beginning, containing
one and forty-eight one hundredths Il 4S-100l
acres.
Also Lot No. 6, and described as follows to-wit
Beginning ut q point in the south line Of the
origipal 80 are tract q James Cahill distant two
old sioue marking intersection Of Said south line
with the west line Of said Cahill u acre tract
thence north 2 deg, east six hundred and fifty
feight S59 feet to the center Of the Warsaw Pike
thence along the center of said pike north s6 deg
thence south 2 deg, west six hundred and sixt.
l8-l00 1890 1890 feet thence north 81 deg 46 min
west sixty ynine 1900 l69 1900 feet TO the plac'
Of beginning, containing one 2100 Il 2-l00) acre.
Also, Lot No. and described as follows towlt
nal S0-acre tract of James Cahill, one hundred
and forty -four and 44100 feet west OF st0n'
making the intersection Of said south .'ue with III
west line of said Cahills 19aue tract nofth deg.
east six hundred and twenty-six 78-l00 (626 78l00
feet to the center Of the Warsaw f1Ie
thence along the center Of said pike nortl
"a deg. so min. west one hundred and thirty-nin
l.9) feet thence south II deg. west six htindre'
and aity-eight e5sl feet 70 the ssu!h line Q
, | the thifty Acre tract aforementioned; theme
south 81 deg. 40 min. east one hundred an
thirty.nve 6ll0O (135 6l-100) feet to the place
beginning: containing two acres, and 'being
part of the real estate owned by James Cahill
. deceased, in Delhi Township, Hamilton COUNTY
case Of Mary Cahill against Sarah Labor ct al
No. 40,20s, Hamilton County Common Plea
Court s.
The prayer in plaintiffs petition Is that she hav
Judgment for Che SUM OF eight hundred dollar
with Interest at the rate of eight per cent fror
the I'd day Of May. A. D.. 1878, alsp for the sum
forty dollars, with interest from the 2d day
I May, A. D., 1875 and that upon the failure N pa
said judgment within the time fixed by the Cour
for the payment Of 90 d sums, that said describe
premises be appraised advertised and sold that Ii
proceeds of said sale be q, piled to the paymg
OF said sums 80 ss aforesaid, and that unless III
said defendant answer or dem OK to said petitio
within six consecutive weeks after the first adve
tisementherein, ajudgment will be tsken for sal
sum 10 a aforesaid. decree will be rendered q
lcordingly and for sacn other and further relief
in equity she may be entitled thereto.
> HENRIETTA KRUETZ, PlR.
A. J. JEssuP, her Attorney. s. W. corner Con
and Walnut streets. Rooms Nos ! and.2. Cinclt
natl, Ohio. ialsStTu