National Republican., 1880-11-09
DistriCt Courts.

SUPREME COURT or TIE DnrEICr-Iu conse-
Qucnce OF the judge being elsewhere engaged,
hi, court has adjourned for two weeks.
CIRCUIT CouRr DIVISION No. l-iusrlcE MAC
AtTHuR.-llull VS.. Culliuanc jury out Hall W.
Coombs judgment below affirmed. Cuppy "
Ingerson VS.. Rcrde Judgment below affirmed.
Mcdaniel vs.. Windsor settled. Lighter Hub
bard ct nl on trial.
CIRCUIT CounT. DIVISION No. 2-JusTIcE ITAG-
NER.- Nor1eet Il Co: vs. CaDclli p!a'nun called
and suit dismissed. Sters ". Cans commission
issued to take testimony. Kendall ys. Terry; de-
fcndant called aud Judgment. AleSander Us.
BurChe: Judgment for plaintiff for S2IO9o. Pratt
Son ". Davis; rule on defendant to employ new
counsel in thirty days. Mclee.tcr vs. Murtagh;
Judgment by default MITCHELL vs.. khDonrn q
Lutu; Judgment for p.aimuu for amount claimed.
EQUITY CuuRT-JUsrCE CoX.--Ecr vs., lIcany;
of CalcndNT plea Withdrawn. Franc vs.. CIandell;
of calendar. Brooks VS. Brooks; submitted. FiiZ-
gerald vs.. Fitzgerald rule on j. J. DAILY rctugnablo
November 10. Theleckc W, Tliclcckc; sale or
dercd and trustees appointed Courtney vs.. FIN
ley; restraining order granted, relurnablc Novem-
Der r. Young VS.. Gaddis: commissions report on
partition ratified nisi Nelson VS.. Moync' decree
of November set aside; demurrer oycrrued, with
lcuyc to answer. BrcrCrtOn VS.. BCrCrtOn; on hear
ing. Hines VS. Morris ct al. pro coniesso against
| Barker.
| CRIMINAL CoURr JUSTICE JAMEs-Winiam
| Randall convicted Of burglary and larceny; mo-
ton for new trial entered. William Pope, muir
| der OF !. +. Butler; on trul. William Hughes, con-
ylctel ofGssuult motion for new trial fled
| ASSIGNMENTS FOR TODAY.
| CIRCUIT CouRT, DIVISION No. l-JuSTICE MAC
ARTHUR,-No. 81 United states, use of WILSON,
vs.. WALKER 50. Wolf VS. Walsh; s., Mcdonald VS..
Rghstine; So Hutchinson vs. Alexander 49,
Richardson vs.. GuliCk: l27 Smith, by next friend
vs.. DougIas, 100 Potomac Terra Gotta company
VS. Shepherd ct al l3j, RieSSucr vs. Shepherd; l39
Walter vs. Ca.ty; 49, MritZlcr vs., Courtney ct al;
llQ Middleton jr vs. EutWs!c & Barrow: lJl,
Morgan vs. Rocssle lJj. United States vs. Potter ct
A.: l5Q. Charter Oak Life Insurance company vs..
1nllmudgc ct al lGl Pike vs. Converse; l63, Gross
VS. SCcOr: lG7. Ciemuutsvs Adams; III, Guista vs..
| Brown; l73. District Of Columbia vs., Baltimore S
| Potomac railroad company; li5, lleriurth VS.. cor
pogation Of Washingt0n III, Washington VS.. Clark;
| ISL United states VS. English ct al.
CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION No. Justice nag
NER.-Appcn calendar No. llO, Tucker Y Shcr-
man VS. kolb. Regular calcndur No. liz. Ruff
| VS. Brown 2S) Wallnglord w. Bennett 2S2, Bur
bridge VS.. Carpenter; 2sl, Wilson VS.. Terry ct al.
| gSG WatRins, executor, VS.. Darneillc 2gO, Fisher
VS. Bean ct nl: ~ Belt vs.. Gockcler; 996 United
States use of Adams, VS. Upperman ct a.; 2DS Wood
". Williams; $50, MRtuska, Craig Il Co. vs. Garand
&02, Willie VS., Bacon; S1i, Avery vs.. Butler; 500
Norris Il Co. Foley; sos Stockstl ct a. W. Roh
| reT $40, Williamson VS. Thomas; 3l2, ApplcmAu vs.
Clarke: Sli, Daniel vs.. Piedmont & Arlington Life
Insurance company; 3lS, Chapman vs. Church; $40,
| Bond, executor, VS.. Fowler.
| EQUITY COURr-JUsrICE CoN.-No. 90 Brercuon
| vs.. Brcrcrun II, Gordon vs.. Brady; -, Cook vs.
| Cook; 2S Fudge vs.. Harris; so, Alexandria Canal ~
Bridge company vs. District of COiumbia III, HI
ton vs.. Hilton; 81, Norton vs. GOWens; 81, Foster ys.
! Foster; 40 Merrimau W.. Barrett; Il, NcCOwlcy vs.
| knights OF S. Patrick; -, RegUn ". ltCgUu; H.
! Tuohy vs. Iolt2mUu; 4G Douglass W. Lucas A.
Mcintosh vs.. Cisselli As, Brown W. Tuicy,
CRIMINAL CouRT-JUsTIcE JAMEs.-Wiil!am Pope,
murder of H. f. Butcr