, 1880-05-09
work that Mr.. Kehoe has brought with him to
the Republican purity the devices which he
learned in the Democratic one.

Judges, MATTHIAS Manner, John Anderson, an
F., J.. Mcaney. were ready ,,.t to recely
tion Of two @ or three tie candidates for delegate
were present and actively engaged In the work
From the opening to the close Of the election
was plainly apparent that the Wnshburnc mel
were 10 he sseendency, and they worked NOR
vigorously than their opponents. At the outsc
good deal Of opposition was manifested be
but toward the close OF the election there Wa
antagonisn1+ the former understanding that tn
Washburne men accepted Blaine MS secont
e9o'ee OF Enthusiasm ] among among the he Grant men s
and they cid not work with the spirit and en-
esgy Of their opponents For some time befoft
the ghost, and rested before O'clock Some u
the Grant men nude mild complaints that
Democrats had been allowed to vote and feN
were challenged, but in every Instance the
judges were satisfied that the challenged person
had right to vote. One OF the Grant candi-
se sesss for the sess esa 5oseq ea to eceon sao as
fhry fhG sFesaSa ed. s"t Is ef1sa DID
aot avail either inss or o1;r n5 pa[,y
any demonstrations Of jubilant. nature to be
m1idc. and shortly after the vote became known
The successful ticket comprised the following
names. and the delegates will vote in the Con-
veu1un for Washbu1ne us first choice, and
Blaine fos second but VII! oppose the third term
candidate from first to last;
Chris Manner, G.w. sponord.
John Stephens, s. Deegan.
Thomas Senuetf, Hermann Benze,
A. L. Hunks, H. II. Wardtaw.
The delegation above named includes some of
the most active political workers in the city. and
iIcans. % Mr. Nancr T received the highest rote,
4ls. and Mr. Hanks the lowest 3el. on the ticket
The average for each person was4n
choice, and opposed TO a third term. was com
posed Of the following named persons: John
lussem, ". G. Tebbits. David Dryer, Josiah
x,t{e To1+& 1t.7N N1fNrp aF1d
The vote for the Blaine ticket averaged twen-
ty-tve for each candidate
:. The Grant ucket was as follows; Dr- g. 4
Barnes. Jobn L. Manning. Ferd Y. Gindcle,
Richard Clark, William Men, James c. Hyde,
William Z. Qutrk, and Lewis Grahus.
Two Of the gentlemen are professional men.
two are otfceholders, one is q mechanic, and the
others are business meu- The average vote of
each was -.
Ward primary was held at Ivery-stable, No.
IL West Madison street, and resulted in the
election Of what is profcssedly known as the
Grant ticket, though 1t bears the names
really elected by the false pretense Of being
three things in one,-a Grant ticket, Grant or
:NRshbur.'s ticket, and washburnc ticket pure
end simple. The election WINS peaccabe enough,
Notwithstanding the unusual Interest, NOT to say
Xotss PEELED; PEELED whtsh Sas st. The }ndefs were
. washbarne nun; and !. NJ. ei Getman, NJ n Grant,
fasS saS oe1i 6S TSs%ps2a a9
under he ssImple, name Of Ninth
on paIeffts 81 he Wef the esss h t1 aa
Grant; the eame with 1he annex. Grant or
Wasaburnc": and still another variation in the
shape Of, For President. E: 3; Washb4rne."
RoeEner. Albert G. Lane, John J. Montague. l.
Doing anu 70 r. re and 91 Ire
mixed up ou the other tickets-the variations
Of the ortslaal-fer the sake q bewildering the
tie the :.wash6urne" % lsbels deh' whieb thete ae
variations bore doubtless caught many OF the
unthinktng into voting against their actual
ers did not avail themselves. Their ticket was
made up Of the Hon. William Il: Thompson, e.
\ T. Herrick, Enfield p Moore, D. "; Clark, F.
md Charles Collins: and bore the synonymous
terms. :" No Third Term Delegate Ticket" and
- -Anti-Grant- -Dclegtte' Ticket split ucket
the Man We Can Elect 1t was made up of the
anti third term men with the exception Of Eek
has who 1ha waS d9pped for smyt1 From al
o1 the challenging, md in this way cut down the
tnird-term m95ority until 1t was no more than
no telling bow the majority would have been
piled up. As 1t Was. the ticket got through by
close shave and the fulse pretenses above re-
1Ser were IS {oa,o@s: sA''' 'o' '' "4Dn'''s u'Aes
SamuelA. Ellis. .349j| Albert G. Lane. .347
Peter tser94fdy -348t John J. Montague. ,3.5
E. A Blodeets. ASH y. Dyball. ll.........A7
Fred Roefner.- .3:6!L L. Bono. .3aS
The votes received by the gentlemen on the
anti-third-term ticket were us follows: W. H.
Thompson, ars: c: II. Hcrrick, 3G5; Enfield D.
Moore, M: ?: y. Clark: se: P. K corcoran, 9G,;
Char4es Collins, D4.
ul the eight delegates elected Dyban and
Line 5ta are for Nash6nrne; the rest for Grant as
most significant remark concerning anybody on
the delegation was that regarding Montague,
va 70 s p ny @ b IND %hs
izataon papers yet Mr. Bond, while Wash
burne man at heart explained very fellcitously
he supposed he would have to train with that set
tally on Aid. s,nyth There wns a triting disa-
possibly nfIect the result-bnt Dave made the he
excuse OF half playful threat to contest the
mater IN the delegation. Nobody seemed to
he wasn't
TIE TENTH WARD.
.. TIE primaries In the Tenth Ward were held at
~ Mest Lake street Tho polls opened with
Republican Club, which presented the names Of
George E: White. James H. Burke, George 4.
2asnsoa ns 2 kliae aHd John Il Cruver: The
an anl-Grant ticket, substituting the /
names Of A. P. Johnson and H. S. Paulson in
place or Messrs. Burke and Cruver. Burke then
out third ticket, scratching !
the name Of A. P. johnson. and |
Steve Revere. The election
wAs quiet. Burke hoyered round tho ballot box |
III day talking Grant and the third term with q |
Vehemence which showed that everyone present |
xas not Of his opinion The vote cast was small,
he rain. as Mr. johnson suid, spelling the fun.
The original ticket, headed by George &. White, |
Tas elected. the vote being as follows;
seorge +. White. c..-. II. James H. Burke. ... 1e5
ohn II. Cruver.....-lSS
4 r. Johnson and Paulson on the anti-Grant !
ickct had II votes each, and Etere
aeyere, on the Scratchers' ticket |
cceivcd II. On the ticket elected
}urkc IL the only avowed Grant MAN, the others
re professcdly Tor Blaine Probably the dele
a1es HiN 80 with the majority whichever way
may be- In tho Congressional table, however,
hey are put down for Grant
THE ELEVENTH.
The Eleventh Ward held the worst, most
hamcful. and most british election yesterday
ftetnoon that has ever taken place within its
rcclnets. 1t would have been outrageous eyen |
oF froe-1ot-R all general election ID the Fifth |
+ Seventh WArds: but for Republican pri-
lnE fo n notably Republican stronghold, and |
fOvetolai!y quiet ncirhborho<,d- it beat any
ling IN the shape Of a precedent, and the re-
'ectable portion Of the voters whether for or
gLlnst Grant, went to their homes with shame |
p4an their faces and disgust In their hearts. The |
adgeS Of elections. D. J. Avery, A. B. Cook. and