The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1880-02-26
ooMMoN PLEAS COURT.

Fridays proceedings, Judge Meyer presiding,
Frederick Grossweiler's administrations vs. Mas
sillon Paper Co; to Court Judgment for plaintiff
for s642 and costs.
Mary schweyer vs. Margaret Schweyer ct al; In
this cause NJ A Brown, Son & Co, on their own
motion are made parties defendant with leave to
answer instanter
Anthony Halter VS. John Altman; order to reap.
praiEe.
saturday-Anthony Cline VS. Jefferson I Gala.
han. decree for plaintiff for 81012S interest from
January 10th and order to SELL
Andrew Pontius, Trustees &c, VS. Isaac Rank, et
al, decree for plaintiff for $1,000 and COSTS interest
8per cent, from Nov ., 1878.
Milo W stover VS. B Miller, ct ux ct al sale
confirmed ahd deed ordered
On Monday the case Of the State Of Ohio against
Phillip CHASER, was taken up. CHASER is indicted
charged with assault and battery upon an old
man named Whitnore. On the first Of last No.
vember in the evember, CHASER, who is about II
years old, was riding In wagon with Whitmore.
Whitmore told the boy to stop the horse and wait
until he got glass Of beer, near by Before Whit
more reached the saloon CHASER was seen to slght
from the wagon, pick up large stone and follow
Whitmore in the dark Whitmore was subse
quently found IN precarious condition, as II
battered witha stone on the head, but has recov.
cred from the effects of the wounds Young
CHASER afterward spent considerable money OF
different saloons, and was arrested. The Jury re.
turned verdict of guilty
The trial of sammet accused OF the murder Of
young Spuhler at Masslllon last November Is as.
signed for March LIST. r..
Wednesday--State OF Ohio vs. Wilson Hugus,
indictment for arson, The jury returned the fol.
lowing verdict: 1--WE do find the defendant not
guilty as charged; we do find him so, not guilty
on the sole ground that he was insane at the time
that he committed tho act charged" Hugus Is
the young man charged with setting FIRE to the
Infrmary barn while az inmate of that institu
ton.
Reuben Day. two indictments for forgery
brought into Court and plead guilty to both
counts.
Court adjourned until IA o'clock p. M, Oh
Saturday next
NEW CASES ENTERED.
No 1929, Amanda Forney and Ephraim Forney
VS. Daniel Imboden ct al, petition filed Feb 10.
| No 1880, G f Breckel & Gov Henry Altekruse
sheriff petition filed Feb 20.
| No 1881, David A Arter vs. the Charity School o
Kendall peton filed Feb 20.
No 1882, John Pierman VS. jeremiah G Unke
fer petition filed Feb. q.
No 1888 Marshal Hopes and William Hopes
partners In trade under the firm name of \
Hopes g. Son, VS. Jerem ish Il Unkeier, cling bu
siness as ]. 7. Perdue & Co., petition filed Febru
airy 81.
No 1884, Jacob Miller and Simon B Weary ad
ministrators Of the estate Of Geo Cook, deceased
Us Thadeus Nighman, Edwin W Page, assigne
OF Alfred Huntington and Alfred and Morgal
G Huntington, petition filed February 81.
No 1885, Jacob Miller and Simon Weary, ad
ministrators of the estate of George Cook, deceaE
ed, VS. Christian Miller and Alvina Miller; petition
fled Feb. q.
No 1886, Matthias sChwiller VS. Frederick Brecl
ell petition filed Feb 81,
1887 John Joseph YsJ P Raueh petition file
February 2Si
No 1888, Francis Weston VS. jeremiah G Unkefe
petition filed Feb %,
No 1889, Charles Lindeman and Laura Lindt
man, by their guardian, John Wingert VS. Chr
tian Lindemani petition flied Feb %,
1910, Mary Westhaven VS. Francis PlersOn; pet
ton filed Feb %.
No 1241, James Neill and William NJ Neil
partners in trade under the firm name of Nei
Brothers, VS. jeremiah G. Unkefer; petition file
Feb 90.
No 1919, Jacob Tramper VS. Henry Tramper p
tition filed "a.