The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1880-06-10

seats are not eoaltsted herr leave "a efafo IN AZ
thay differ from tIe n;n,,s ~ ts.
in resnect Il thar H. I, ~
az istrct q, s
ton The afontin q tha n;as,s ~ ~
ity resulted Draciically s. chan nino ffa trsi1;
tons and practoas a the 20 ~ = =;
many States vhera Snr, ~ ~
State conventions have selected deleagtes tona-
nonai conventions. When Republicans In ma
uonA convention Assem- led shall lay down
system to govern future action ii the selec-
tfon OF delegates, it is probable that the Re
pubhcans in every State will cheerfully con-
fern TO euch rule. but we declare as our de-
lberate judgement that the majority propose
for the adoption Of this convention an expost
iaeto rule which viii operate with great IN
national convention In seating delegates chog-
en- in violation Of the long established ugages
Of the Republican party Of the State to be AZ
sfected thereby. This action we affirm is cal.
cnlated TO subject this country TO the criti-
aen aa Iest tna ge% Of e.
President and Vice President 3
In reference to the contest Of the three seats
from Alabama, we report that Jas. T, Rapier.
Willet Warner and VIM. z. Smith, are not del
egates to this convention from Alabama. and
that q vacancy in the delegation exists as to the
place claimed by Mr.. Rapier, which it is pro-
per should be filled BY the duly elected and
u 6UCCQOAnC3
vention, and that the places claimed BY Mr..
Warner and Mr.. Smith are properly and regu-
larly filed by Arthur Bing ham and Robert a.
slosely, ~. Were IoNoWs IN the common le-s
pols long review OF preliminary proceedings
~ tne cohVenuonss when gave rise to the
coa 's't
With reference to the State of Illinois the
minority submit through the convention to
the country brief prepared by counsel which
reviews the circumstances of the primaries.
county and State conventions. declaring with
the minutest detail for the standpoint of sit
ting members. It would ocucpy about four
newspaper columns. The point made are al
ready well known to the public and ave been
published number of 3times. It is signed as
follows: B. F.. Tracy, New York; Powell Clay
ton, Arkansas; w. e. Concur, Webster Elan
negan, Texas; Green B. Raum. mi nois: VII
liam j. Hooper, Maryland; Isaac Hayman,
Alabama; George y. Clark, Colorado; Rich.
mond P. Stoll, Kentucky; II. E. Havans, Mis-
souri,; J. NJ. Thornburg, TENNESSEE; Jno.
Cessna, Pennsylvania; Charles C. Tompkins.
Virginia. ss'
The ninnr;to ranort d;saoraea with +ha
Utah coea ana 4; rofrer5 - West W;,,r;,,;a Wy
\ M Conger nresan7ad IN hahaIf ~ 3ha ~
ioritv cGyracted roii ~ ~ neho-s - oooars
WITH The re,,ort and asfed frat tha oan so
~, an1 aI .h askeu .na. tne conVen-
Dscn.sian fo,Iaw .nS The n,;n easo aoo
dncaI anrrv and ovc;taa dahota o1 s e.so piu,
tba 1r;ros ,,yo.a,+o1 az raon;1,t =. - H,'1 "
mort The concl,,son If the Jap,s ~ mrooaad;noss
cannot here he GIVEN = NY 1AJ = osoo>inse
-. ~ ~ So.
Il hnare o speca o. June . and ne ear
y nOule ~ JANE =, ives an lmpartiai ano
1 1oaJ;e summary o. me proceedngs on the
euea.uius auu lhportah6 polnls, up 70 o'clock
o"SSu u.1.y n1g g 1ne o:
eoss;n ioa =. June 4.7ine convention was IN
o'clock ThS sa lso aa % .sn 70 after
bn ca " s;yea Is maere e
ssi p es51s 3ese,a5ess peS Sesasa sss ss
mirht Ia Ell ~ sta, nnee Mnoever ~. ne
rassi,., - = sa!l q states was ordered on the
neora 49,. ., 49,. ~ ~ % passou WEI ouI tntee
49, w. svHe, :e pTlne gvon y oeiegates
fnr nons eHS vi iia- Jus was qul1e q poans
~ ~ eon u1An !,
40 aor week past the Blaine delegates have
nn,,id NJ .no decaaf1ne tney
T Toutu no! support Grant \ ne was nominated
i.a ~ an1 len naye - party
.sta1a y. :nas tley We1e pTepaIea g
az az M 8, - .ne ne
aithoaah ~ ona Vva v9cs ana
IN ~, ~ yves ws4s L1e a.
~ :. 4he no eta ~tae 10, iouu anG
tha,e 1 1sara 1870. 49,, ~ ave .ne lo eaeo ann
III. 1,io = 49, nunle1ous SHOUTS " Me- NO.
d;J ,,nt i,, VIZ ~ Iau wen nnieacenlng 20 Don
,1a;r 1918 trae - 70 70 pIonaoly eau
s o nnna me i0I was gated noWeyer,
e so,,ePs sniee i.om Wess Virginia Sonkl1ng
lon s Up nus nlst POM Dy oEerlng sec
oau iesoiuslon aeclaIing .nas tnose VINO vol
~ u n,e negau I'VE, quo nol deserve seats IN
convention. ms brought the boilers to
e N aees eacn one processing that ne intend
GU " euppoIt tne NOMINEES ana processing the
=! stalWart hepuDlcanlsm. Still the feel
ing OF Lne convenuon was against them, and
several oelegates advocated Conklhgs reso-
luuon. ven. Garneld nnaly took the floor
ana turned the TOE. De said those men had
declared they would support the
nominee, and objected to the form
ana Tone OF the resolution. He urged
;Conkllng 70 Withdraw it This idea seemed
10 TAKE WIN Inc convention. ConkNng said
ne didn't understand that he had made any
SUCH point, but rather than run any risk or do
any injustice, he would withdraw the motion.
Inc majority and minority reports OF the COM
ma.tee on recess were ready for presentation,
ana aiter an informal credentials Of half an hour
the lengthy majority aud minority reports of
the committee on credentials were read. These
reports showed six contests on which the COM
mittee couldn't agree they were from Alabama
linno!s, Kansas, fennsylvan la, West Virginia
ana Michigan; Logan objected to the report
wnlcn aimed 70 the contest IN the Illinois
delegates at large, declaring that there had
deS sharn fi,f accn - hat mos u 80 recol
q California delegate which grew quite per