, 1880-04-25
CHICAGO TRIBUNE: SUNDAY APRIL 25 PAGES

publication Of the pamphlet was designed t,
:. have effect on this present quarrel as well a.
In the coming trial of De Young. 1t Is al
; yet too early to gauge the general expression
Of public opinion on the tragedy, but so fal
as could be CLEANED from the talh heard OF
the streets this evening the tenor seemed tt
be that the death Of De Young at the hands
Of the son was the legitimate outgrowtll o1
=, the recent attack Of the deceased upon the
father.
THE CHRONICLE AGAIN.
AS regards the responsibility tor the pub
lication of the pamphlet heretofore referred
to, it is noticeable that the Chronicle this
morning fails to deny in express terms any
connection with it. After mentioning In its
local account Of the tragedy that the Bulletl1,
extra OF last evening assigned the document
| as the provocation for the shooting, the
] Chronicles article continues: deceased
only yesterday afternoon stated to the manag-
ing editor OF the paper that he had been
| greatly annoyed by notes addressed to him
] requesting him to send copy of the PAM
| phlet rejecting on Kalloch; that after some
| trouble he has succeeded in obtaining copy
that had been sent to a gentleman in this city.
He expressed a fear that the circulation Of
the document would do him injury, and per-
haps prejudice his case before the Court, as
its publication might be attributed to him,
and expressed the hope that there were not
many Of them in existence"
DE YoUNG's BROTHER INTERVIEWED.
The Post publishes an interview with A.
H., brother Of the late Charles De Young.
On being asked what he considered the
causes leading to the shooting he replied he
did not know. Referring to the circulation
of the previously mentioned pamphlet, he
said: II do not know If that was bis griey-
ance OF not. He certainly had no reason
to think that my brother had anything
to do with the pamphlets. We had
nothing at all to do with them, and did not
even know that they were In circulation until
shown one by friend. think that q GER
tain Mr.. Shimmfns, editor and proprietor of
a Kansas City or Leavenworth paper, who
accused Kalloch Of swindling him out of
$4,000, put them in circulation here. This
man has constantly assailed Kalloch in his
paper, and has avowed to
MAKE HIN D1sGoRGE.
He was out here, believe, few weeks ago.
and, finding that Kallock was able to par him.
determined to get his money"
Mr. De Young further stated that the re- !
cent visit East Of deceased had no connection |
with his trial. It was solely to make terms
with the paper manufacturers, and on his
way home he stopped few days In Kansas,
and there learned some damning facts against |
Kalloch, but it was not intended to use these
facts or the pamphlet at his brothers trial,
Inquiry at the Post Office shows that the
pamphlets began to come in last Wednes-
day, and many were circulated on that day
and Thursday and Friday. If the Postnas-
ter knows where they come from he for the
present withholds the information.
Young kalloch, on being questioned this
Afternoon,
DECLINED TO ANSWER
question as to whether he had had eyi-
lence that De Young was the instigator of
he pamphlet saying he was in the hands OF
counsel and considered it more prudent to
ay nothing at present.