Bismarck tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, D.T. [N.D.]) 1878-1884, 1880-12-03

mona 8 dall, Wnere general merTln6n'
was kept up until the small hours of the
next day. May they live long and live
happily"
DISTRICT COURT.
The Disposition Made Of the Various
Civil and Criminal Cases.
The fall term Of the District Court be
gan Nov. Oath at 2 o'clock p. NJ, and en-.
ded Dec. I'd, at noon. The officers Of
the court were as follows: Hon. A. II
Barnes, presiding; John A. Stoyell, dis
trict attorney; E. N. Corey, clerk; Alex
Mckenzie, sheriff; L. N. Griffin, deputy
sheriff; Ed l.. Bishop, stenographer; Jack
Waldron, bailitf. The following is a list
of the grand Jurors: N. Dunkleberg
Geo. M. Bird, M. Eppinger, NJ. l.. Marsh
VIM. Woods, James Peoples, r. B.
Thurston, H. 81. Galloway, Geo. Gibbs
0. H. Beal, Geo. Reed, T. w. Griffin, J
P. Dunn, E. II. Bly,, j. K. Walker and
John Ludewig. E. H. Bly, was sworn as
foreman and Jack Waldron sworn to take
charge OF jury.
CIVIL CASES.
The following civil cases were dis.
posed of:
Hugh Campbell VS.. G. s. Patters on, de-
cree of foreclosure granted for plaintiff
Nellie Harmon vs.. Robt Harmon, de-
cree for div orce granted.
Mclean & Macnider VS.. E. J. Martin
ct al ; judgment for plaintiff in the sum
of $229,64.
N. Dunkleberg VS.. Robt. Roberts; de.
cree for foreclosure granted.
M. M. Bane vs.. Thos. J. Mitchell, and
Bane VS.. Thos. Mitchell and Sarah Mitch
ell; judgment for plaintiff in both cases.
Thos. Higgins VS.. the city of Bismarck !;
judgment for defendant given by jury
The n. P. r. r. VS.. w. B. Watson, as
county treasurer; demurrer overruled and
defendant allowed twenty days to file
answer.
Robt. Roberts vs.. Ansley Gray; judy
ment Tor plaintiff.
Leighton & Jordan vs.. Boyd & Cong
don judgment for plaintiff.
w. S. Fanshawe VS.. Mclean & Wins
ton; judgment forplaintiff
II. F. Douglass vs.. John McCurdy;
judgment for plaintiff.
Emma Murphy VS.. Robt. Murphy; de
cree of divorce granted:
Galloway & McGarvey VS.. Mclean &
Winston; judgment in the sum of 81 ,622,-
26 granted by jury.
Geo. w. Sweet VS.. city of Bismarck !;
judgment for plaintiff in the sum Of $500.
j. E. Walker VS.. Carpenter & Gallop;
case continued. 81,
Geo. SANeot ,o.-J John Bowen; case in
equity, dismissed.
Margaret O'Cennor vs.. Walker. Bell
ows 8 Co; judgment for plaintiff in the
sum Of s96,59.
Mclean s. Macnider VS.. Michael Pitt.
niger; judgment for plaintiff.
Plummer & Eckford vs.. LeMay &
Winston Bros; case dismissed at plain
tiff's costs.
Gee. w. Sweet vs. P, R. Barrett; con-
tinued.
CRIMINAL CASES.
Thefollowing We're the most important
criminal cases disposed Of:
Territory of Dakota VS.. r. J. Truax,
John Connolly, Ed, Westcott, l.. N. Grif-
fin, P R. Barrett, Quinlan & Hallowan,
Leo s. Cranberry, Meserve & Co., NJ. Nc:
Lear, Bogue & Schreck and 0. o. Reed
Indictment for not having obtained Co.
license for selling liquor in Burleigh
COuuty. 1calt Sul1lJ, s'A<' @AAAe>' F'A0o
each.at
Territory vs. D. G. Dye, found guilty of
petty larceny and sentenced to four
months hard labor in County Jail.
Territory of Dakota VS.. John Homer.
Defendant plead guilty to forgery in 4th
degree and four Indictments, and senten-
ced to go days hard labor in County jail:
Territory of Dakota VS.. d. Frazer, plead
guilty of robbery in second degree and
sentenced to six months imprisonment.
Territory Of Dakota VS.. Jack Veneble,
plead guilty OF manslaug ghter in first de-
gree and sentenced to fifteen years in the
house Of correction.
THE CALENDAR
was cleaned up entirely and the term
very satisfactory one. There were but
few criminal cases, which argues well
for the county. The grand jury was a
good one and in every sence did their
duty. All the close Of court his Honor,
Judge Barnes, was presented with peti-
tion signed by all the members OF the
bar in this county and the court officers,
asking his reappeintment. In few we'll
put remarks the judge thanked them for
their manifest appreciation of his servl-
ces.
Quick Work.
81 e.