New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1880-04-01

Mr. RfiK fJem XVI advocated the amendment. He
terna Revenue judlcrns policy tow"r" dstiiers.
The amendment was agreed TO- 49,. - 49,,
Other uulrnportant committee amendments were also
agreed to- ;,o,, ,r,s 10 s,,isa ont the clause of
,uarshas of leriiUns cor whicn $3.50 II nnprnrri
aicil snail be appointed by United states Circuit or
nstr,ct Jniges, and insert clause rfovdinS that
the appointments shall be made by the Circuit vi Dh-
Mr. EpMUSDs tIep VII called for the yeas and nays
on inns amendment, and 1t was agreed to by I"rV
sr ALLISON tRep. Iowa. moved 10 strike out the
a tes aud cxpens IS O; the Uuicd s,ae Mashus ard
the general deputies ned during ne Lscit your
ins june 80, 1850. $6o0Ooo." and insert tie word
Mr. EATON tDen.. Comm said II The Senate intended
Ia retain The amendment just 70 Ell ,n Tor sfecai
devmiics they shou not agrce TO THIS one; .,..
Mr. ALI on would nkc to nave tne Senn.4T POM f
ME SToN-i AIN MT pointing out clauses in the
Sir 1LLIsoN-se infer know 70 t Of II, nOne aud
th thu wOr nEss moi 2csr by ~ party rS voeyoa
allowing the employees of thu Government Printing
Onee HOLIDAYS With pev ID J1mnT} Y ar n,btT nun
July d. December 3D. THANKSGIVING Da' a"u o'nei pun"
i % phvis Dsm W. Val asked the Senator ,, from
~ orner nj legislation appropriation BIN =. was
opposed e fGh sgs ,hS s o% c rCm West Virginia
would sO3n a Sa n Would That Senator vote to
strike ont the marshals clause as 1t came from the
ME- DAVIS rer,icd that whnt the House did
thing what the senate did was another. The Senate
Wr ELAINE SAID The House should say there should
never be lcgi. ton appropriately pills. he would
Urn ne was IN tne House. lie thought such legislation
WRONG body INDUCES III H. the o'hcf' I'D SUI
Mr. gEsb%TNDs RepvtJ said nasnuch as the amend.
mcnt proposed w the Senator from t ne %aN o GT ga
against what that scator ns|f n,ldcred the l1sI
nc pie that ngTa Pgr e ne sac ' The 20 M
that IL was Of order us proposing eSsiaoh on r'h
er Mr lBIHINfWhere do you find general aI4roprl-
a wr EpMCHDs-In rho nature OF the bill and the
| slant practice Of the senate. A.. l.. ,...,,..,
Mr. BLAlNEA rule exclusively confined TO General era
Tue presiding officer tMr RoLLINsl ruled that toe
rena iSs T w%S mot WA, Ts" order VII
MIR EDMUNDs agpealed f%m ms rsli n;osoo o .no
r,, Mn Of TIC CHAIR lie wanted to say he
cured with Ills friend from West virginia M DAVIS,
Nix DAVIS said nc bad made no argument on inc mat
ter, but simply asked the Senator from n,amc wnelher
ar not he was OF general legislation on apprup
''S mr .EsARPENTER-I may have misunderstood the
Senator nut undcrst hun TO say tIat he was op
posed u general legislation on appropriation bills.
| Mr. DAWSON thai question do not propose to DC
Mr. BI4iNE said that he grounded his opposition to
the notca legislation on this bill simply chiefly
ON the ground that 1t Ia appropriation bull II
was vicious essence, iu INTENT and In original esign
no less msch.evOus whether 1t was an independent pro
| osal or
had said before now there was no. another senator On
record much legislation as inc senator from yer.
| harrison with any other Senator who ever sat IN the
Chamber oI loading the statutes with such legs
| MI. EDMUNDs said the Senator from Maine was. as
usual i'm Intensely mistaken imputiDg to him what he
aIGs s ra s 10 now stand Fiat ssnafor had
thought 1T former occasion wh, something I'M lnss
the Senate TO say the came ng IS me H
| dIeave
lie chose In assailing him 1t would 40 no particular
MIR EdInunds 10 certain extent, but be would try and
bear as OF those blessings that come round
IN tbe senator ro% Maine It was Of the bill
When the time came to vote on that t would
Tie Senator probably also forgotten that the House
aud senate rules differ The senator from Mains sCuE.
the House mad done wrong he proposed hat te senate
should do wrong and as tue rules pro'ne Sna no'
Mr.. BLAINE said the Senator from Vermont forgot
that he had within briet period. insisted that 1t wac
tne duty of the Senate oppose piece OF lessa
ton on appropriation bills sent oyer from tho louise
coedins to support the ruling of the Chair, wien the
that white GnasT the ~ s a Change 70
| m order upon further consideration. and taking The
a rule taseas s ne
MT CARPLNIER thought tins ruling entirely sound
MIR BLAINE did not. and an aniinatlDg and amusing
niscsson cnsued between Messs Blaine and Carpenter
as TO the duties presiding officer us 10 ruling On
MI BLAINE thought the presiding officer should give
the grounds for ruling 70 the satisfaction OF the Sen
ate aud asnded 70 hls own pTucce In this respect
| when Speaker Of thc House.
| Mr. CARPENTER SAID the Senator raising the point
stated for IT, and the presiding officer ruled
| on it as ne deemed proper Tae Senator from Maine
haa presided where iusoience the rule and pet
fnps had become accustomed to having his decisions
| Questioned.
| MI BLAINE rejoned that whether the House was %
not an ,nsoient body, It would DC regarded as
| Of order" without giving his grounds for the de
cisi0p. - ,
| After some further discussion Mr EDMUNDb moved
70 strike out the eanse relating 10 the aud
pay OF special deputy marsha leaving the appropria
4 tion intact. Rejectcd-yeas, ~; nays "a
The bill then read third time. Yeas 80 nays
"a; Mr. Edmupds calling for the yeas and Botl
| these strictly parry votes.
Mr. EATON said that vote should be reached on thu
BAL at an early hour Tomorrow.
| MT COKE iDem, Texas), from the Committee on In
dian Affairs obtained leave 10 report substitute for ht
bali rrrfsinz tse Ute agreement Ordered TO be printed
4 and III 0i the table.
Al 1:s0 D. the senate went into executive session