The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1880-06-21
pAnKr. me oonINe lIAN.
TN. Results OF Saturdays Primaries-A
solid North Against = solid south-In.
cidents Of the Day-What a Defeated
Candidate says.

=
solid North Against y solid south-ln.
etdentn OF the Day-What Defeated
Candidate says.
Pursuant TO the call Of the County Exc
cutiye Committee, the Republicans Of
Ohio County met at their various polling
places Saturday evening, for the purpose
Of selecting delegates to the County Con-
yentlon which is to meet at the Court
House next Saturday, and which will
nominate Sheriff, Prosecuting Attorney,
Assessors for the city and country dis
tricts, and members Of the House Of Dele
gates. The canvass was made on the issue
Of the sherifalty alone, and as will be
seen from the votes, as given below, the
result Is q decided victory for George ID;
Parks. Squire Schultz, however, carried
that portion OF the city lying south Of the
creek, for his delegates. The country dis
tricts went for Parks.
The day passed off quietly and In Or
der. and there was noticeable absence
Of the rowdy element at the polls. me
remark was frequently made that not
drunken man was to be seen on the
streets. This, ,contrasted with the man.
ner In which the Democratic primaries
| week before were conducted, and the
unpleasant incidents attending the lat.
ter, is as favorable to the Republican par
ty IA ali indications seem to say the con-
trasted tickets will be.
In one district an unworthy trick was
played by somebody, though we rejoice
TO say that 1t cannot be traced to any can,
didate. A number OF tickets were voted
with Parks's name at the head but. con-
tanning the names OF delegates who favor.
ed another candidate. The deception was
not effective in defeating Parkss dele;
gates, however, as 1t was early discovered
and exposed.
The combination between schultze and
Bayha did not effect much In their favor
north OF the creek. We talked TO Squire
Sohultze yesterday afternoon, and iouna
him quite satisfied with the result OF tne
primaries, and quite proud OF the strength
he exhibited over the creek, as he had q
right to be. He says he will take OIL his
coat, in the event OF Parks nomination,
and work as hard for him as though ne
himself had been the candidate. Those
who know the Squire best say he means
what he says in this respect and count on
: Ills aid as large element in the success
!, Of the Republican ticket next tall.
II will be seen that one OF the largest
, votes was cast ever polled in q primary
election in the county.
{ Nothing at all can be told as to the
probable results in regard 10 the candl-
dates for the other positions on the ticket,
and any estimate as 10 their relatlVe
strength that could be given would be
only from conjecture. We append the
, names OF the gentlemen who were voted
for. with the candidate for Sheriff repre-
sented by each, and the votes cast:
WASHINGTON DISTRICT.
Parks Delegates G. Morgon 17s, VIM
/, Otto 17o, G. B. Jones III, Jos. Kuhn ITO,
Q ". Cunningham l74, Rufus King l72, Jos
Hamilton us, Ferdinand Fey ia, Y, r
8 Hamilton ia, Henry Serig III.
!, Bayha Delegates Emery 50, Da'
8 yid.P, Duval IS, Adam Henneman "a. Geo.
: Zoeckler 81, Edward Mansberger 81, Adam
!, Elig Si. Geo. P. Folmar 81, Chris. Wineher
, s., Fred Weimar s5, William spargo 80,
|, MADISON DISTRICT.
Parks Delegates-L. H. Morris 1876, L. Q.
!. Reed 100, Feargus Whaley 1850, Samuel
Norton 1911, Robert Strange 40, G. Rolls
: lis. Caleb Sylyis 1856, Geo. Gundling 1888,
], Kindleberger 1856, De. I. B. Campbell
1888. -,
3 Bayha Delegates-A. G.. Robinson 10l,
, Lewis Jones l06, +. O. Myers 10y, Alex
ander Forgey 100, George Clayton l05'
Simon Kline 10l, ]. M. Warthen iui,
, William johnson 106, Jacob straub luz,
Elijah Poland l02.
CLAY DISTRICT.
Parks Delegates.-C. N. Jones l79, s.
B. McColloch ISL, W. F. Peterson ISL,
, Alexander Laughlin 1874, ]. H. McFall
, ls0. Samuel Harrison 100, Melvin Richards
lS0' w. Fl. Robinson 16s, Thomas Bell
Vile l79, @. Y. Lucas 1872.
i Bayha Delepates.-John Mills 50, Geo.
) Fl. Hibberd SO, A, III. Britt "a, Fred Miller
81, Dietrich Roemer b, Frank !, WOODS POI
64W. Fl. Sheib SO, William NJ. Baird ~,
N. r. Hobbs 50, George McMechen u.
UNION DISTRICT.
Park Delegates.-James McAdams 1874,
David Campbell 1874, W. B. Simpson 1888,
David Nesbitt 1888, ]. A. Dunning 1874.
Ben Allison 1888, John Lewis 1888, Jas.
Robertson 1872, Orlando Truxell 1888, Luke
Fitton 1888.
Bayha Delegates. H. severing IS, j..
A. Henry 6S, ]. W. Armstrong 67, Henry
Hanke 81, Frank Bowers 6s, William
, Ramp 90, George II. Robinson 60, r.
Whitehead 81, ]. Randolph Bhtts go, VIII
liam Young OF.
CENTRE DISTRICT.
Parks Delegates. -Thos. R. Moffat "A, @.
D. Hubbard 72, Charles Reed "A. VIM.
Hamilton 70, David Stein 70, T. O. Moi
fatt "a. Geo. Meyers "a, s. O. A. Hamil.
ton IA, Peter Wendel74, John E. Parker
"a. -, :,
Sohul,ze Delegates.-Thomas Q. Ed
wards l02, E. ]. Wunderlich 1903, George
G. Roth lO4, George Fry 103, George Mil
Ter 1903, Henry Roemer 1903, Isaiah steph-
ems 10S, Ernst Metzner 1903, Albert link
1903, ]. w. Kite 105.
wEBsTsR DISTRICT.
Parks delegates-A. ]. McNash 10s, Or
Vile Carroll 100, wills johnson 1O5, Geo.
Lynch l04, Sol. Hastings los, ]. D. SIAN
ton 1903, James Darling loo, Henry Ahrens
1VO, SAsu EVANS 4Vft S4"o Na'
l06.
Schultzs delegates.-Fred Goodfellow
III. Thomas Bennett 40, August +. Y. E6-
cling l7s, Alfred D. Work l79, William h.
Williams III, Thomas Harris 176, Isaac
Freese l78, George Montgomery III, John
Boyce III, Samuel H. Armstrong 1888.
RICHIE DISTRICT.
Parks Delegates-George Bowers, Jr.
%, Adolph Fritz SO, August Miller SO,
John @. Devine 81, John speidel SO, G.
Hanneker so, =. Warehouse, Jr. 80, M.
Roth 90, d. Mccoy 33, George Baumm 81
schultze Delegates-H. O. Meyers PAS,
William II. Coombs 245, Fred Over 245,
James II. Freese 245, Charles $. Ferguson
245, Josiah Jackson g45, Captain VIM.
schocky 245, James I. McCready 245,
I I'll. T l..