New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1880-11-14

haA already been published IN Trsfa befor
/ hrd ever srcn ir Hart or the orgiua
etser OF any copy e BE-. This n't ia iee Davis must
hag In wn wlsn Ac peun,d .he above auos. 5sca4ss
sworn in Dis Tic.rucc md n.cr -.-ezam uat'ou
w Nr stou-a,on. 10 uiih ir. B,ss interviewed yeny
tle lates Ola. taa ntrview vi-n -Ir uar. aut te
aunllon z tIe left.r .O1E usse Ol thr 30 1i O.to-
bar. r.'er ils publication i1 IrtH end not bri,-r 10
u.t kuoa w-ttier Mr. Utrt mlto mg.a.o 300 h.s 'es-
uoue rs o. t0c drfe hurt hc fiI Their. IS non ble
l-tifcatou rst "a Dtyt o. h1.c statement Oh ris
mistake 90 ORD 20 -10z .-- Tie bench ihe character
ID. c.az.u,at tGo 'srsk aai been pointed u' aud
te uatc had uecu l.cI she possibility Of an con-
Ircv.r,Y.
WIe was wuu1, -lis g a-emolt sent a Messenger
O. 1r. Hart 90 asc.-t er D. lal ever made any
drc.arlon no yf-i nee run h' facts Is have stated
tlcm BIZ HAstr1I lea tlf he never said. t,stll or
National Committee saw the letter 90 a.yfnce oi me
uu LEGATION OF Che Text Of the Letter truth on le 20rn
ow as 10 the minor assertions contained in che above
TX racl never lounced the "HOtg and signature
oi tnr Ter 90 DE- Boo the handwriting OF General 1dr-
l1-on the contrary. 10 he uiesnce Of Mr.. Hart aud
900 the gentlemen present dc Jared the body Of he
letter not d. IN The nandwrtng or General Garfield.
odt sad tlii oeeved DE signature TO he his auto
graph. do think thar Mr. Harl has given any te.
onY TO tue contrary, out II be has a an error which
can bee shown by TIE testimony Of al the gentlemen who
As TO the second interview. the evenings It took
place "a ter my speech nc Culckering Hail. when was
Xa.ed and took 40 otaer part IN the discussion. but
% rearrm bel ei la the commences OF the ature
dl1 no. ten Mr.. Hart that would nave made 10
forgery n. could" nor has he or any one
else tes flied that l ever used tins ex
precision with this statement leave II
10 TIE pubic 10 Judge how utterly baseess is the follow
Ing Judgment OF the Courr:
" However much an equitable division may leave for
others, upon Nr Hewitt must rA the larger share or
Tor The first publication Of The base and
jusuirt m his apology for attacking witness who
was par upOn Tie stand against his VII. and forced 10
tell he truth. the wlOle truth aud nothing but the
truth" He says: And whenever person con-
heclrl WIN the on nee IS sworn az a witness
ON uS Investigation bis testimony is subject
to the cr.uc.sm int belongs 10 accom-
plces md accessories" Would t not have been better
hr Judge had stated The testimony as IL WIS, before
sulJccuuE 10 60 criticism
Lastly judge Davis eoks 10 justify his onslaught
my private character by The assertion that he I'D went
on with hs associates scattering The forgery broadcast
throughout the country and tnaC so far as rhr
envelope H. concerned he autographs sent forth tac
SMILES wcr uOt uun copies 0 -O much OF TO- envelope
as was gwen. Tie first Autographs published
show truly that tur Washington psf Of
nor me dire %. the Autographs aud fac simIirs
aItrrwurl used nese things APPEAR in pain and clear
perhaps, 0e sufficient answer To- shy TIA, never cr-
cu.ated an. liho-lapus or tto siml.' VI llnr klii
charge le made. am assured Oy tAe persons who "a
seud out roe fac Smiles NAT only tle RI OF accurate
ftc Tmrs were only plt-h "a In Truth. w.icl %
is NOT prrtcude. that tur committee Lau any CONTROL
iol0-af .o make amy commentary Whatever l1Hu tAe
y ii"i -. F tli'fc'"t pr tlr "lhou promo hB
Judg Davis. IL D.. enough Tor me 90 point ou at tle
un.a''A up1u which Le mas built up tnr utHrs uron
ni caaa--- rs lse I'D net; au4 Hti TINS d-lol-,it-
uuu tAe cosfQ Ieuces Ouly pe DAMAGING r0 himself
was prepared Tor THIS aftlcA bV ile evidently pre-
arranged Dr.Imr1ry statement of 1ir suugntOu 10
reply u Tll Times %. To-day, and I 1m now forced
90 n'av. faf r.e h. "a concerted scheme 90 qt.r,ur
i'r more hIu Iitv yeIr,, ana Oh which ] can 1u0i-
'-le5 ru ior jt't lul-let ,h1' io a. judge Oh Tia
Esr-Ior.. E9y. I3.I5-J. AaaA, g. HEwur