New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1880-08-03
THE COURTS.
fNFELICITIEs IN BROOKLYN.
DIVORCE SUITS HEARD IN THE coUETs YEsTERDA'

DIVORCE SUITS HEARD IN THE COURTS YESTERDAY
MARITAL RIGHTS AND WRONGS.
In the Brooklyn Courts yesterday much time
was consumed by proceedings in divorce suits ana IN
other domestic mfeicities suit for limited dlVOfce
mas been brought In the City Court by Mrs Sarah Ann
Smith against hor husband George Smith, an engineer
on the ground of cruel and thurman treatment They
1--we in Anse-st and wore married IN 1858. They have
n daughter twenty-four years Of age. and sou OF
eich cen years. Mrs. Smith made appncaton
through her counsel before Judge hey-
no DIS yesterday. for injunction restraining her nus
band from ericring with her. She alleges thar ne Il
frcauenty intoxicated treats her hars1ly. and
recently turned aud her daughter ont OF the house
which she owns and that she time had TO raise
money on "A mortgage buy the necesS aries OF ne
counsel for the defence stated that the real causes
OF tue domestic difficulties In the Smith family were
two The first In regard 10 tie ownership OF the
house I'm winch the couple lived. This was put in TIE
wies hands her brother Tor loan OF $2OO 10
Mr. Smith, with the understanding that 1t should be
decided back as soon as the debt was i'd. Then the
we's other raised the money 10y uawng some ot her
Jewels which gave him. The Whole thing WAS mercy
IA scheme TO get the property tho her Bands Where II
has since remained The second cause was "a Glsput"
over the conduct OF tho daughter. VINO received the
visits Of a married man. to which MI Smith objected
but VIII Ich the mother encouraged. In July dispute
arose and The defendant went upstairs after II was
over and his wife and daughter went away and dld nO
return. II further alleged That the de'ehoh"'
always supported his wife WELL and never exercised any
cruelty toward her After u statement Ivy the palntho
counsel that much of this to HIM. and that be
desired leave TO answer it, IT was agreed 10 give MN
tine file bi answer.
In The su for limited divorce OF Mrs. Isabe In Monroe
from her husband, Orge Monroe, before Judtc b"f-
nrl IN the ,eeil Term OF the supreme Court IN Bu0k
lyn yesterday. motion Tor Hihohi anu cOuhe'i i'o
was made. Mrs.. Monroe alleges that hef husDlhu aS
treated her cruelty aud nhumany and has neglected. 70
cuu heir
charges tGat he and his VIE were unduly intimate ~"
fore maria ge and that taey married whn ne was ouy
nineteen wears Old. lie alleges that Ms WIe reIusc1 10
perform Ter proper household dutles-prepArhE ioOd
and keeping his clothes clcan-and that on SuhuaFH
instead resting he had TO WORK IN cleaning the ~ use
where they live. While he only received sinai WAGES
furniture providing hs wife with servant anu ah'bN
Ter II the c0unTy for the summer. Inc Juuge IT,
served bis decision. ,..,, a.,
plgIutid aud defendant respectively IHtrcse
Schmidt. OF No. 26j Eiery--L, Brookyu, ana WI IAN
Lcuss OF 80 40 eserOe-st. was begun IN me BROOK
band O. which the pdlntiHs bIOthef Is hil"cnru,
and the TWO mon are great friends. An humtoy IT."
up between II SO Sc hldt aHo Her Dio-'V o,i Ia
which passed proper bounds, and On May 10 lSoV sho
became the mother o. CHILD ot when she he-ea ia.
Rcu-s was the father. She therefore brings sun Io'
-lO coo damagee The counsel Tor Reu7S n'ed Ms an
aver YESTERDAY ayerring that no promise OF lnariaRe
WIS ever mate. a criminal proceeding against hrts7
was BEGUN in the SIKH Disr.c Court before JUS
tee : miller. 1900
" f. j. Hendricks who was convicted OF bgamy on
Friday jan the KuSs County Cour o. Se-siOns' WIS scu-
fenced ya4t,fdy ~ Judge Moore Ia tWO years anu sA
manths confinement IN thc County fenlteutlatS' .,.
A decree OF absolute divorce favor Of The piann
WA. entered III the Court, Jn4gt COJko PrtsiN
! e. IN Brook yn Si,urtay, In the suit OF MITE Ap"y
Shaw against her hush md. CIR ShaW pgilol ner In
the banjo IA "a sioon in Ne"fork Inc CUSTODY
ID