Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1880-02-14
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.
nonnl.tlnont M 1

6l19-McCreery VS.. Everding ct al.-By order OF
Hon K. f. Morrison, C. j., the hearing of cause
transferred to Department No l. Cause argued by
Lawrence for appellants and Wilson for respondent,
and order affirmed.
612O-McCreery vs. Everding ct al.-Argued by
Lawrence for appellants and Wilson for respondents
and order affirmed.
6979-People, etc, VS.. Center ct al.-Ordered that
this cause be set for hearing Thursday February
10Th
6s17-In the matter of Fifteenth-avenue Exten-
sion-Opinion fled.
Department No 2.
THURSDAY. February 18th.
6124-Maett VS.. Swain-Argued by Holiday for
appellant and Baldwin for respondent, and cause
submitted, with five days to each to file additional
authorities
69S6-McDonald vs. Patterson, Superintendent Of
Pnbic Streets etc.-0n motion OF Parker for petit
TONER and fling the affidavit of John Mcdonald
herein, it is ordered that alternative writ of man
date issue directed to the said Superintendent OF
Public Streets of the city aud county of San Fran
CISCO returnable before this Court in Department
No. q on the 10th day of February, 1880, at II
o'clock A. NJ of said day.
60S2-Smith VS.. East Branch Mining Company
Judgment and order affirmed Myrick, j., thorn
ton, P. J., and Sharpstein, j.. concurring.
Fisherman VS.. Haffenegger-Order reversed
and cause remanded. Thornton, P. j., Sharpstein,
j., Myrick, j., concurring.
Department No. /.
6l22-Marston ct al. vs. Simpson ct al Argued
~
dents, and submitted, with two days to each to lie
points and authorities
6320-Helbing ct al. VS.. Svea Fire Insurance Com
pany-Judgment and order affirmed. Mekinstry,
j.. McKee, j., and Ross, j., concurring.
10,4S2-Coby vs.. Superior Court Of Santa Cruz
county-0rdered that an alternative writ OF review
issue returnable to this Court, before Department
No. l, on Mondsy, February IS, 1880, at IL o'clock
A. M and it is ordered that the time for giving
ce for the hearing of the said matter be shortened
to one days not CO. and that notice thereof be given
to the Attorney-General and the District Attorney
OF Santa Cruz county
FRIDAY, February 18th.
6I1S-S himmins VS.. Fifteenth District Court-Re
hearing granted (McKinstry, J., being disqualified,
took no part in the decision OF said cause)
64l7-Goodae VS.. Fifteenth District Court-Re-
hearing granted (McKinstry, j.. being disqualified
took no part in the decision Of said cause)
6953-San Francisco Gaslight Company VS. Sha-
Continued by stipulation until Friday, Febru-
AIRY goth.
6939-People ex rel. Burridge vs.. Ptarson-Now
comes defendant by his counsel, H. G.. Siebert, and
asks leave TO withdraw his plea entered herein, and
to make objection to the petition on file. Ordered,
that five days notice of the motion be given to the
relator, and that the same be heard Friday Feb
ruary goth, and in the meantime, and until said mo-
ton be disposed Of all proceedings on the reference
be stayed
6175-Soue VS.. San Francisco G,slight Company
6667-People San Francisco Gaslight Company
6676-People vs.. San Francisco Gaslight Company
On motion of Clement ordered that these causes be
heard in Department No. 2 and at the same time as
the argument in People vs. San Francisco Gaslight
Company, No. 6l70.
6,973-P People ex rel Cochran vs. Board of Educa-
ton of Oakland-Argued by Cohen for appellant
and Swift and Morgan for respondent, and pending
the argument the Court took recess.