Belmont chronicle. [volume] (St. Clairsville, Ohio) 1855-1973, 1880-03-04
COURT REPORT.
Ju lge WM. OKEY, Clerk A. C. DARRAH,
Sheriff SAMUEL HLLEs, present.
Spring Term, 1880.

dictme 1T for keepinga place Of public
resort for the unlawful sale of liquor
Plea of guilty; fined $50 and costs, and
to stand committed until paid. No or
der closing place of business made, it
|appearng to the Court that the unlaw-
full sale had ceased. FF-F1sTF ;
Leander Brysony VS.. Mary J. Ramsey
ct al To jury. Verdict in favor of
plaintiff and against Mary and John
Ramsey for 1924 As. Judgment also by
default, against Montraville Ramsey for
1924 4S. Order to Sheriff to sell proper
ty attached, and apply proceeds to fore
going Judgment. Defendants gave no
tice of a motion 10 set aside verdict and
for new trial.
Amos Finch VS.. VIM. Miller. Judg-
ment against defendant for S26s and
costs, and decree finding same mechan-
les lien.
John n. Finney ct al. VS.. Wm. Dar-
rah ct al. Finding against defendants
for S9124 sc. Decree of foreclosure and
order to Sheriff Hilles as Master for
sale of mortgaged premises.
VIM. Thomas VS.. Mary B. Altman.
Replevin. Verdict in favor of defend
ant and against plaintiff for $50.
The term of Office of John w. Shan
non, Master Commissioner, being about
to expire, on application he is re-appoint-
ed for term of three years, and there
upon he appeared in open Court and ae-
eepted the appointment, and entered in
to bond Of $4,000, with Aaron F. and
Isaac w. Bamsey, sureties.
1St National Bank Bellaire VS.. James
la%o =. o., Is, la.,
tiff for $1094 27, and order to Sheriff
HilleS, as Special Master, for sale of
mortgaged premises.
State of Ohio VS.. James Williams and
Samuel Lockard, jr. Burglary and lar
|ceny. Separate trial awarded defendant
Williams. Jury after celebrating sew
en- hours returned into Court, and re-
ported that they were unable to agree,
and were discharged from further con-
sideration of the case.
Special venire for Petit Jury. On mo-
tion of A. III. Mitchell, Pros. Atty, and
it appearing to the Court that the same
is necessary, it is ordered that a special
venire issue for Samnel McGeorge, Jas.
Young, Daniel Steenrod j. Jos. ]. Taggart,
Parker ID. Anderson, Jos. NJ. Mitchell,
Robt. NJ. Wilkins. John B. McMechen,
John Marshall, John Stewart, David NJ.
Sutton, and C. III. Arick, requiring them
to oppear forthwith to serve as jurors.
Mahlon T. White ct al. VS.. Louisa
Bethel ct al. Partition order of Feb.
"a, set aside, and the tract of land here
tofore adjudged to the petitioner order
ed to be sold.
The State of Ohio VS.. Abe Johnston.
Indictment for keeping a place of public
resort for the unlawful sale of liquors.
Plea of guilty; fine of $50 and costs, and
defendant to stand committed until fine
and costs are paid. No order made for
close of premises.
State of Ohio VS.. Jos. Carter. Indict-
ment for keeping a place of public re-
sort for the unlawful sale of liquors.
Plea of guilty. Fined $50 and costs; de-
fendant to stand committed until fine
and costs are paid. No order made clo-
sing premises.
JOHN McKeever VS.. Eli Stanton, Ext.
ct al. Motion To set aside verdict of the
jury rendered in this case at the Summer
term, ,lS79-sustained for the reason that
the verdict does not respond to all the
issues in the c;Ise, and does not show Il
IA Va pnAtICo
answers. --f. rf .rI
Andrew Schick VS.. w. II. Roberts ct
al. Dismissed at costs of defendant.
Carlos G. Kelly VS.. VIM. j. Kelly ct al.
Partition. Jacob Heatherington admit
ted as party defendant. m
The State of Ohio vs.. Jas. Williams
and Samuel Lockard, jr. Indictment for
burglary and larceny. Separate trial
of defendant Lockard, jr. Verdict of
guilty as charged. Value of stolen goods
assessed at S25. Defendants counsel
gave notice of motion to set aside
verdict and for new trial.
The State of Ohio VS.. Samuel Lock
ard, jr, Chas. Yaus and John Quinlan.
Indicted for Robbery and assault with
intent to rob. After a jury was impan
eled and a part of the testimony for the
State was heard, the Prosecuting AttOr-
ney, upon leave of the Court, entered a
nolle prosequi as to all the defendants,
and they were released from custody.