National Republican., 1880-04-22
District Courts.

District Courts.
SUPREME CouRT OF THE DIsTRICT-C CHIEF JUSTICE.
CARTIER AND JUSTICES WYLIE AND CoX,-KnoX IL
Osborne, patent appeal; patent granted &. X Mar.
shall, patent appeal; petition dismissed. Clark
FShGt iail lold's' Ga'enS appeal argued and de-
low affirmed We eilicker VS.. Beck appeal dis.
missed, English vs.. Vunderwerken; submitted on
briefs b. Dickson oBren, ispringman Il West VS.,
10 require plaintiffs to elect ETC., overruled Mr.
o. II, Simonds, of Michigan, on motion of Mr. ".
i. Bell, was admitted to the bar.
CIRCUIT COURT No. l--JusTIoE MAcARTuup
Lewis trustee, etc.. VS. Shepherd; verdict for plain.
tr for $500 Baker vs. Iabcock ct al; verdict for
plaintiff for si02.75. Mukin VS.. Miles ct al; yer.
dict for plaintiff for $3.50 as against Noses Hodnett
VS. NcSdull: plaintiff called and suit dismissed
ohuu vs.. Simmsi defendant called and judgment
dismissed. Wol0rd VS.. Mrs f. X. Finch; plaintiff
takes non-suit. Hogan VS.. Ebert jury out. Mat.
thews' administrative vs.. Baldwin ct al; on trial
EouTY COURT-JusTICE GsER.-Mc Pherson VS.
LOvclli submitted. Spaids vs.. Spaids; motion TO
restore causeato calendar oycrruled. Smith vs.
Chapman; si,lill3 decreed TO complainant and
interest IN default sale ordered Hilton VS.. Weston;
nyostmcnuby trustee in United States four per cent
bonds ordered. spaids VS.. Spaids; motion by de.
iendant to dismiss refused. MacDanlel vs. Mac
Danie decree, OF sale, Zantznger VS.. Zantznger
Oh hearing. WoOdvs. Wood; rule on complainant
reurnable April 20, 1850. Birney vs. Ioonard;
reference to auditor ordered
CRIMINAL Court - JUSTICE JAMES - Frederick
Cook, assault with intent TO Kill A. T., Newton; on
Iial.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TO-DAY.
SUPREME Court or THE DIsTRICr-CuIEP JUSTICE
CARrrER AND JUSTICES WYLIE AND CoN,-No a
Dickson w, Baltimore 4 Potomac Railroad Com,
pany;7 o lrlen VS.. Baltimore x Potomac Railroad
Company & Springman VS.. Baltimore q Potomac
Railroad Company; 9, West VS.. Baltimore 4 Po-
lomac Rnilrood Company; H. Foley VS.. Blake; 10,
Browning VS.. District of Columbia; a. Wilson vs.
ArlGk and United States use OF Wilson, vs. Ames;
TO- Cess vs., Burgess II, Oliver vs. Cameron; is,
Davis Sewing Machine Company VS. Rothweli
CIRCUIT CouRt No. l-JUsTICE MACARTHUR-No
$50, Cook vs. Gibson, 5Sl, Joyce vs. Poterson $50
Mcdonnell, use, etc, VS.. Brown; $50, Brosnan VS.,
Brosnan ct al; 5S7, Birch VS., shipman; 5O3. Birch
VS.. BlumonbeIg; 59j, Poole VS.. Trunnell; bO7 All,
ford & Co. VI. Allen COL, solomon vs. Meyers 6O3
%Hnder ys. GegeT 605 Cross ct al. VS.. Cabell GO7'
Young et al VS., Kelly; 600, Davis vs. Swami Oli,
Kirby vs.. District ofCOlumbiR. Gl3 Stern VS.. AtZe.
Bl5, Dorneille use etc. VS. Kitch; 6l7, Henault vs.
HenaulG Gl9, Hin VS., Mclaughlin; G2l, Boyer VS..
Hewitt lOlansboe,
Equity COURT--JuSTICE JAMEs.-Ho, TO- Campbell
". Smith; Is, Waddy VS., Anderson; 20 Smith VS.
Kenny 81 Cross VS., Bell; %, Grant VS.. Freedmans
Savings 4 Trust Company p, ODonnell VS. VIM
satli 2O Hewitt Vs. Fibert p, Mercer VS. Hogan
2s, Mccormick VS.. Freedman's Savings and Trust
Company; 30 Fassott VS.. lIii2.
CRIMINAL CouRr-JusrlcE JAMEs-Fred Cook
assault WIN intent TO Kill George Mentz, resisting
omcer George Munder aud James Scheh riot