, 1880-11-12
THE LAKE VIEW DUMMIES,

bullt. A"' '1'9*'"p' '"''"es' ~"cn
THE LAKE VIEW DUMMIES,
a decision was rendered ycstcrslay morning by
Judge Ttt1ey on the tnntan for m Injunction #,
the case Of tito North Chicago 1iaiiwny Company
azainst Tho Town nr Luke View. THIS VIVA Il bill
tn rostrnfn tho town atthnr3tIcs frntn nrrcRtluv
or cai,snF to b0 arrested tho c,tglncrra u,)t et.
ductor< Of tue enlnptalnnnts .iultstny stcyu rNrs
which were ruu IN tho I,wn ut Like vlrw. The
tnsSti thase,l MI ordinance in Ortul,rr declaring
1t H'isaiI:e IL rlln my strcot.car propelled by
stcHnl III tho town. Tho North Chicago ftultwuy
Company wns tho hnly Inrty tt did t1llH islti IN
orslcr t0pruscnt tho feGted difficulty Tiled blll
setting Utt TINT tho town authorities is fur l4ck
~ 1sGl Kavo II permission to ny trncks and rtir
cars through tho tnwn; thut tho tnwn ia ~,
spArscly settled that horse pnwcr cnnnt prtltlt.
ably Ut ',sc alid II It Is prevented from using
atcntn power 1t will s1,tTcr irropnr1tble injury.
The otsllnAhce wins dcclnru.l tH be ilcyat, nnl
tho conpaf,yaskcsl Tor III Injunction to prevent
tho tnwn authorities from lnterrerin. with its
cAra or tho per8ons operating them. The Julvo,
aitsr stating tho fuets, aattl:
Thu question as 10 tho Jurisdiction ot Il court
of Ghateery 10 grant mn Injunction ug4t,ist cor.
pnr71te authorities to Gnli,in tho enforcement
Il liz 81 asfcn% w, MD i'""ss e "s II c.ero !s s
op!nlUa thai ills Court hns lurIsdeuo, for M tic liz,
lnrYu amount nf property invtiyul wtIIcl ~tif
hntlcr tnninga that csin hsvcr bo nec,lrutoly
tsGsrtat,led " rcasun ar tho enforcement of tho
lost. or tho effect thnt tho disseminating nf Tho
connection Or tile Lake View track with tho city
WsS W w a,'y hye @ thS e. .rss o. ,G ,,away
SUMO extent irruimrahlc. Again. wiiGro tho @
s<.sls atid tls rights ad convenience of trs.ilsi.
Of thu public nro involved, u cuslrt ot
eqiy aes a HsrefS v ao"c,p %s Il TIC e
true TINT tile validity Ut the ur!iluauec OF itself
would ~ m ny nr1!ln:l W for e.ultnh!o interrostson.
tho grounds bafuru stntul, 10 ,rll3u Il c.lae Civ
tng jaria'iet!on to 7 court or el!Isty: -.
i tero soo! 9rot'nd for doubling wssthor iii, 'iao
Of It, Is a valid exercise Of corporate nowcr?
The ordinance Is vory peculiar oiio. Gcnrlng
Ssdsass ssns unSn a IT. ate ss ta hnn spy tint to it s
the fS!lWay. aad psoh!bts tie mo II It ot ssSaa,
Tor 80 sce appnesy gss; yet
when takcil IN connection with arcs. and s.. II
ts apparent TINT tho etltiru orAlnHncp Is aimed ut
pany or coror.tions. it needs 10 auttttsrity to
10 cited II s',ow that thu Corporate n,,thorises
10 single lnivl'iaMi Of carporntot.. Xll o1sil.
must apply nliko IL u persons atld corporations
' s key a asa re teii erasce e
claimed to be vn!d also ccn!,se In ltroKation of
tho Sr5 m"ap ,s ~ ,G ;;uresylsor to tho
with II Wild ctcreso by. tho town Of tho power
It Is claimed tho ordinance Is void, ns 1t utlucr
takes to dectnre what shall he a nnlaansc, nnd
dec!nres e tiat to he ,'!!snce. tho use
What is or Ia not nilisahce NJ tn tho ilsv Of
stsa pWor M n,,,st necessarily dapea!l upon tho
powor mny possibly 10 n1,sauuu III mo neigh
borsiotha and not n hnosher: Tho nero
declaration BY ordinance TINT tho Mso
Il snch., Wnethor It IS i n,lisailce t m,ist
inecessartly, i + 4 easo Of thls ehnr'as,str,
i'll decision. THE ordinance ia also elnltned to
no unreasonable bccausu It is unnecessary, tl,nt
but few persons could derive btneat fr1tn II;
sho,'ll DO determined upnu ,pt,,ofs, not .uW.ll
e"s o"s u na Eli n sS sSas s rrsr ~ e aS hator
thcru y shown any wnnton. willful, Or oppressive
exercise Of tho discretion ind power by law
RIG BIZ Nttacks tl,e power Of tho officials Of
t!io Town 4 of Luke View to Mt ~ II lsnard Of
aa ea II" u IL ,as sasS
stronE Tr1,,,1s for he En'n,ins ot this sss!,
1oston ans ono tbas Should 'Fg So eSs'Sa cer
mined ut tho carttoHt possible moment. Tho
Town supervisor. Ass9ssol, hna Commissioners
Of tic Constitution of 1870. hid eowor conferred
on them to nrt na j!oar.1 ot TRUSTEES. Tho
! prnyidc. by gc'oru! Inv, rnr, township oraaa-
izat!on, and prohibits spsclal !egi*a!ton i,
SS''fGR ts GaRs,snrs n!sfs having ID s s sss ssi
general law IN rrgari 10 township organix,l.
ton. nll speelal iaws on TINT snh!ect, nlnn,.s
them TINT confGrFsilG tho powers Of n ltoara Of
Trus:ces upon tho town officers of Lake y!cw.
With tho Roaern Inv. Tho Judicial ,.llilI viii 700
| at gHnco that thcro Il mitch iorcu IN tho pusf-
tson: i is VT nf;csary x for n.e M nov to Gass
] would bo rcspo,s!blo tor tho t!as,MHos which
| would result frun tho enforcement or this prdt'
nnncs, SHOULD feel Inclined 70 retuse Tho n.
asnef iaS s1S Ill., IT, hoso nS waa s. ~ isxo,.,y
To- thD .on 4 ,hq mi osananes =, m
inise,t'ious town sonst!t6ios for ilc xrest l,,ss
i WIZ sitter by tao enfnrcenunt u t!,ts orli.
should 10 tested In Il court Ut lnM, hut M, b.,
] tlhliy or hourly nrrests, whleh wtnh tlestrt',
Sfo1@"ts 4,a rHgsF'y , %a& "rEsy Sdy o;
bp perln!ttsd IL bring III lcnst tlreu Buta to test
this ordinance 4 it shai Insist npon ts e,trec,
rnt' pstt trS6 sl DC ,y, strI,g irI' atS ams
md lts prGscut uso therenf, Until thtr0 q lhH
dciat by Tho law eollrts.ls to to validity Of tht
ordinance, and until tue further order Ut this
Court
| DIVORCES.
Mary Horncr flied II bill ycstcr,lay against hol
husband, Frederick Bernor, charging him witt
cruelty.
Catherine Koeth nskml fir n divorce from
Chrlstup ko.fn Oh Auc0nnt Of hts bad habl
OF constantly EutttnT drunk.
c1t4t31,