Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1880-10-01
An Appeal of Readjuster 80 ~
RdJuSterS

10 the editor OF Inc Alexandria Gazette:
Feeling deep ntorestin The ee.ll,2@aa g.,
The State debt CO basis which w:ud b. j.
AID tquit,Lls. AZ 10 the pow,r Of tic re,..,c.
the W,iter OF tiia. th3ush = bj@ahI'!2:, H.
fused to furd his bold5 uYdor ihu cid !laiig,
act, s1d proposed through tha public pres
readjustneut of the State ditt soon a!icr l..
passage OF The fuudirg bill. Ard thnugh l.
hss cot approved the a:u'sa Of tho s2!F-a::..i
reacjusters of latter days in &! thef Sos, l., h.,
felt deep sympathy with tho grta! o! :e's -:
whi,h they HAYS srive1; AID he la! c3rel
that 10 1881 Sumo g.tat. wis,, "a, 81 t4G'l
| BILE principle EculA &c adopted ;a oo.v;u.i,a
| which would he approved ~ TIA p,5.i'. 49,;
| booming las e Tie .aal @Gai:i ga'ir;!s,t.
aud forever this weed uiesian. n, a14,-n
however, Of macy Of the leaders il. ~, !Ir.
| has recently unsettled my c,a:!';an5 nj
| nigh blightsd ny baauE. Not s.I-Grd 49,
| makicg the settlement CT hy S;a;a d. IL.
one great issue at the proper time, h-!ae q,
people, and separating it frcm al otHcr a..
| tons, they have attempted TO cngra!ti % -
eral politics. and 10 order to s:clfo CiLG !
| themselves, they are making /. I'd ism, So
only for congressional hopofs. tut Icr i.'.:..
| patronage; and when tsty had ral9:! IA 80.
| tc;pate ID either CT tho naiin3aI o,n7sn'li1
for the selection OF candidates FIR T." -
dercy, for the avoTcd rsaBon 'tha;ihs} io:..a
ed to ell. Q: 40 Independent llec'0;s! ~
pledged to 60 party, a1a whca the c,th G. "
| ended, prd ito veto of tireini, rnstt d e.,
the issue, theV would affiliate aiih thst r.fy
| who would ttf;r item Tie btst terms. !.g
| nov rsfuss 10 ute with tha grad NJ c,rs :.
a,igo parry Of Virgin. il Ii, c5oaI oi IL,
cock, but prefer rather 10 cjalcscc Wnil r. pa
I;cans, 10 cid 10 s.cu.o !hei1 c>.opara'i," a.
| the election of Themselves 60 ciioa hsr S'.t.
The electoral vote ol The State ts,": So
daugereG, Hiae, prudent, end cin:civltg; e
adics,ers aod demo :a's ui al s6a2,a {. rl.ir,
| len on State qu:stioes in ShanandGah adj Pa.',
addressed com nuniclt!eus 10 Q:atI-l hlatCt,
aad Dir. koiner, chaismea OF Tia c2m:l:;ita
tho reacj1ser aud Conservative G1"'cf' :
parties OF Virginia, begging tucm 10 GEL.
the c!ection CT ll.rc,ak iy iskiug tiIa e "3'
fronl each tlcSG. sud submitting III. cG4c q
| tia eevopsh 10 III, nuIona dsm5craHi c.
mister. Of thia patriotic prop32ilioa ten.;at
Mshope took 90 motto :, ard When i. s&- ~
mlted BY Tho CONSERVATIVE coIul,tco = "ia
oomni;ttc. they .sd;ela,ily rtjeo:cd i. i -.
posliln thus euaaaLl1K tfOm tn3 lt;!1Ii
MISSES Of both paris W::o saw aud ken go
the State teb. question bod o0,h,rF 70 u $50
the eieo.io ofu Pftsdep! It Go llo:ttd H!.;%..
and earnestly dssiriog to un;e ill tho cd 81.
men.s, ~ho stood shoulder 10 shculicr 10 SIS
iog iho State from military dsspoi3In and ca
pct bag rue. tui thus ilsuFn tic clcc.'CH e.
the PATRIOTIC Hancock. was sprr9cd ced!@ e
By The nonfrrl leaders CT patty, wa ns.uc.;
10 erofeSs ell the vr W., Eoceu'y asd l,!"!'-
geDce OF the StAto. tut ula put:r ri1it.! NJ
TO democratic SUCCESS.
Why sp,sk OF l!o iniaDCCH Ir0pjsl!i'G -
submit tho eres. issus uv,l7ed 10 the Pee
dsntial confess, IS far S. Virginia II colc:rn>",
To tho vote Ct a:y one, black tr white. raGies..
read lister or democrat. whether legally qG!.ii'!
to vote or not? Why speak Of tho cDa!i:! b"
between tie leaders oflhe radical aud reaGJ9s .'
parties to defent the regular c1ts.iVa,l7: t@Hp
craticHanccck electoral ticke?W Why apesk .! -
Withdrawal! ofradical candidates fJr Cju2rs'i''
favor of reaGius.cr candidates, ard tho re!u,si
of sadjusters 10 run Where radicals hsVo tie
msority, feri0g they might eodsngef lheir de-
feat, and secure the clcCaon CT o1nisr'i.;s
democrat? Why speak ct tho ctfjr:s q "a
rea5 listers to disrupt the radical S:aIntor ca
venton in order 10 capture tia! vote iJr ,GliA
selves? Why speak Of tho rsicsal o! sn'A
men as Barbour. Harvey, Moffstt. rliiec12:c
and thousands of Others who hoacst!y des!r2 -
readust the State debt, bit viii not ati 2'c ~:
these sel6sh aod uopatrictic lced;r', "h1 rs
sought by every eorc:iVatle po;i!ioai na11!''
ton to promote their oHa pe:sooal ca!s 81
that. too. at the pail oil the gres. !ilsry Eo'.
constitutional demo cato p,rty IT lho u1j:!
States? Let it be koosu, bo repeated, b. r
iterated through every town, city ard har@; -
Virginia that General Mahoos and III r,'i
jus:er satelltes. rejected c)eterp:ucusg. t.:
wise. prudent and pstriolic rroDo:l;loo Of ~
sons Of the Valley. preferriug co,iltion "fn
the radicals to union with the lo!iJH:Es o
Stonewall Jackson aud the cjtsa!yall7e r't@
juster ard democratic masses o! inc reoP!a -
wonder that su.h party cju!t "thSH,
computc.ion OF c>nscienoe or blnsh .! s1lcs'
choose as COMPANION a radical republican. g.
gro rather than a orelegsed SELLER Of II"
StoueHall Brigade Choose ye between ;ScA
A CONSERVATIVE READJUsTc2
TAXA m, noya hnme m Mary and TIL Ert