davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1880-03-31
HICKORY STRIPES
JEANS.
DRESS LINI,

Naumkeag Corset Masonville ii y
jeans ...........lVta v horlC 's....ss.'
Kearsnee Corset Garner Flat Cam
Jeans .........,,.lU Drlc ,....,.,..'',.
Thistle Wlgln -. W Garner ii q Cam
Masonville roll brio ............,.
Cambria ....... 81
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
IN THE DI>TRIGT COURT OF THE

SECOND Judicial District of the State Of Nevada IN
and for the County OF OrnsGy. }. NJ Short, pialntln
VS. w. Holconb, defendant. ction brought III ID
of the Second Judicial strict OF the State
of Nevada the County OF Ormsby, and the COM
paint filed said Of Ormsby, i'll te Office OF the
Clerk of said District Court The State OF Nevada sends
greeting Geo. w. Hocomb defendant: You a hc"eby
required appear il action broue b. eaist you ny
the abevenamed plaintiff in the pistncs Court o. the
Second Judicial District of the State OF Nevada IN end
of OrInsby and to answer the complaint
therein copy OF which accompanies this sumpos)
within DAYS exclusive Of the OF Vlce) after e
service on YOU 0f this summOnsf served within TINS
County; served out Of this County bu Ill this DIS
tric twenty DAYS otherwise within foty days-or
Judgment by oefault will be taken against Tins said
is brought to the sum OF SIX Hundred and
dollars cents, balance alleged 10 be
plaintiff account OF goods wares and
merchandise furnished you by plaintiff at yourhe defend
special instance and request be ween ire th oay
September, A D. 1S7e and the Sth day OF july le'e
the fully appears i'll plalntlh complaint
file in my office, copy OF which IS here"lth
served also demands Judgment for costs OF suit
And you hereby notified that if you i 10 app ear and
answer said complaint above required, the said
plaintiff will take Judgment against you for the said sum
of S6l1 43 and costs of snit.
Given under my hand and the Seal of the Dis
49, trct Court OF the Second Judicial District OF the
State of Nevada, in and for the County OF Ornlsby,
SEAL ibis 18th day of December in the year OF our
49, Lord, one hundred and seventy whine.
decl7 j. H. MARSHALL, Clerk.
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
ASSESSMENT NOTICE.


MOUTH CARSON SlLSEh MlNiNH
~ COMPANY.-Location of principal place OF business,
San Francisco, Caornia.-Location of works, ormsby
County Nevada is hereby given that at ting
the Board of Directors held the 18th day OF Deoem
ber A D. 1879 assessment No. 81 of twenty (25)
per share levied upon each and share OF
the capital stock of this company, payable Immediately
in u gold coin to the Secretary at the Office room
lib Ledesdorf street, San Francisco California. Ally
stock upon which this assessment not paid on SATCR
DAY, the 18th day of January, A D. $780, will be den-
quent and advertised for sale at public auction and unless
payment is made before will be sold Wednesday, the
5th day of February, A. 1880, at the hour oj o'clock
assessment together with the cost OF adVertls
expense of sale By order of the Board of Directors
o. BELTS, Secretary
Office Room l, 1l3 Ledesdorf street. San Francisco,
California. decl6
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
18th day Of OCTOBER, A. ID. 1879.

At ID o'clock of that day then and there to show
cause, any they can why the pray of said insovent
should granted and assignment OF his estate
be made and he be discharged from his debts and iabl-
ties in pursuance of the statute in suchcases provided
and meantime all proceedings against said insovent
be stayed.
Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this, the
18th day of September, A. u. 1879
lSEAL. j. H. MAfSHALl+
County Clerk and ex -offcio Clerk of said Court
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
MOT ce NO. l3.
a CT OF CONGRESS. APPROVED JUNE
IN 3. 1879.

United STATES LAND OFFICE, !
CARSON CITY Nevada January S, 1880. I
Notice is hereby given to all whom it may concern
That Alfred Jacques, Of the CouHy o Washoe, state OF
Nevada has this day filed in this office his appca ion No
49, to purchase from the United states ,vernHant tie
following described tract of land, chiefly valuable tor tim
ber and unfit for cultivation, southeast q arter OF
Section 30 township No. II north, of inge No 10 east
NJ D. NJ aiming l6O acres, and situate within the
Carson City, Nevada, U s. Land Dis ,rict.
Any and Ill persons having any interest III, clain to-
said land adversely to said applicant hereby required
file such adverse claim with the Register 81 said Lar"
Office within the sixty days period of publication OF t
notice Or failing do they will be barred of such ad
verse right or claim C. N. HARRIS, Register
jan10-60d
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02

Second Judicial District County of Ormsbv, State OF
Nevada-John Combs his credorsNotce to creditors
of insovent: Pursuant to order of the Hon. VIM NJ
Seawell presiding Judge of the said District Court notice
hereby given all creditors of the said nsevent John
Combs to be and appear before the Hon. s. d. King,
Judge of said Court his chambers in Carson City, in
the said County of Ormsby on the
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
NOTICE No. ~.
ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED JUNE
IA 3, 1878.
UNITED STATES LAND OFFICE,

UNITED STATES LAND VFF1CE,
CARSON CITY, Nevada December 20, 1876. I
Notice hereby given to all whom concern That
Andrew J. Toft of the County OF Washoe State OF Ne
vada has this day filed office his application No H.
from the United States Government the fol-
lowing described tract of land chiefly valuable for timber
and unfit for cultivation, viz: West half Of southeast
quarter Section "a in townsh No II north of Range
No 1S east NJ. D. NJ containing so acres, and situate
within the Carson City, Nevada, T. S. Land District.
Any and all having any interest in or claim TO-
said land adversely said applicant hereby required
to file such adverse claim with the register of said Land
Office within the SIXTY DAYS period of publication Of
this notice. or failing do so they will be barred
such adverse right or claim
dec 2l sod G. N. HARRIS, Register.
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
TIE DISTRICT COURT OF TIE SEC.

OhD Judicial District Of the State nf Nevada, iii and
for Ormsby countyn the matter Of the estate Of Mat
thas RnkePursnant to order of said court made on
the NINTH dag of October A. D. 1879 notice is hereby
given that Monday, the THIRD day of November, A ID
1879 at 10 o'clock Of that day, being oay OF the
November term A. d. 1872 of said District Court at the
of said court has been appointed as the time
aud pace for the proving of the will of the said Matthias
Rinkle ecaased, and of hearing the app.ica ions
Marcela Rinkel wife of the said Matthias Riukle
ceased. a!d willis C. Clarke, for the issuance to hem
etters tstan'entary wien and where person inter
ested may appear and contest the same.
I. Il. ARSHALL, Cl-".
Carson Citv, Nevada, o. ober 10, 1879.
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02

s36,576 2S
Statement showing outstanding indebtedness f the
county December 1, 1879:
given to the Virginia Truckee Railroad .. -
~ iis..rast ON tbn same to Dec = 1879. 4:39 "A
,t @ n,St ON Cener. Fund ..... 100 80
r,, os, Indebtedness s............sl 81 3, $50 a
Respectfully submitted
81. l. YAGER.
County Treasurer Ormsby County, New
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
NICHOLS FALLIBLE INJECTION

Guaranteed to cure promptly and permanently every
case of Gonorhea elect and Whites, no matter I
how long standing il directions followed Internal
medicines not recommended necessary cure guar
anteed or money refunded. For sale BY B. F. Foster
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
N!COll the TAILOR

DESIRES TO CALL THE ATTBN TION
of gen the daily arrival of New York styles
of French English and Domestic goods from his London
and New York houses.
Being importers, able to guarantee and
give the REAL article at such prices defy competition
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
seM-AaMg L REPORT Of THE e0uH
AUDITOR.
osvtcK oy COUNTY AUDITOR,

OFYhCK COUNTY AUDITOR,
ORMsBy COUNTY NEVADA, December 81, 1879.
To the Hon. the Board of County Commissioners Ormsby
County, State of Nevada Gentlemen:
The County Auditor respectfully submits the following
report the fiscal affairs of the said county FOR the SIX
months ending December 3lst, 1879
Reliance on hand at close of business June
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
NOTE e,
500 FrLrox Spvrgr, BRooKLyN, N. Y

OFFICE OF COUNTY TSZASURER-S0-
~ TICE: Under Act Of the Legislature III the
State of Nevada approved March the 9th, 1865 notice s
bereby given that the Assessment Roll for 1879 mas TINS
day been been placed in my possession by the county
Auditor and that the State and County due
and payable the same becoming delinquent on the
SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1872, and that
the laws in regard their collection will be strictly en-
forced VI. L. YAGER
County Treasurer ard ex ofico Tax Receiver
Carson City, October 20, 1879
Morning appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1877-1906, 1880-03-02
sERii.aMEUaL REPORT OF THE c. UaTY
TREASURER.
OFT1cs OF COUNTY TREASURER,

OFTIcE OF COUNTY TREASURER,
CARSON CITY, Nevada, December 81, 1879 J
To the Hon. the Board OF County Commissioners OF orsby
e'HInty, Nevada
Gentlemen have the honor to herewith submit my
report the receipts and disbursements with such other
information may be necessary for full and complete
understanding of the transactions of this department FOR
the six months ending December 81, 1879:
Balance hand July l, 1879, as per Cash - 49,
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
The Republican Candidate for Vice
President.

The Chicago Times has an article on
the nomination of Gen. Arthur as the
Republican candidate for the Nice-Pres-
idency. Read the following paragraph;
"Never before in the history Of Ameri-
can politics was the second place ON a
national ticket employed to increase
party animosities, instead of soothing
them; never before was Nice-President
named by shrewd, alert and audacious
minority in spite of victorious and far
frrrcs1n magnanimous majority; and never
before did a minority, splendidly gener-
aled, compel a bewildered majority, in
the zenith Of great victory, to accept,
for associate nominee, the man of all
men whom the majority would never
have consented to nominate for any of
fee, could the proposal of the name
have been anticipated or adequate de-
Liberation been obtained for its consid-
Grafton after proposal. When the ma
ioritv of the convention and their adher-
ents realize that they have put in their
platform a civil-service plank, and upon
their ticket for Nice-President that most
distinguished obstacle 10 civil-service re
form; when they discover that in their
platform they applaud President Hayes,
and OH their ticket have the collector
whom he dismissed from the New York
custom-house; when they recall that it
was John Sherman's vote that made
James A Garfield the nominee for Presi-
dent, and that his colleague is the ex-
official whom John Sherman declared,
as Secretary of the United States Treas
ury, should be expelled from the civil
their emotions no ordinary lam
guage will be able to depict.
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
$1,000
LOO
$500
Garfeld's DeGoIyer Pavement Job

Garf1eld's DeGoIyer Pavement Job
When Garfield, the nominee of the Re
publican party for President, was Chairman
of the Committee on Appropriations, which
must report in favor of it before any money
can be paid out for the District, he secured
pavement contract for DeGolyer & Co., of
Chicago, from the Board of Public Works
of the District of Columbia. For doing this
DeGoyler & Co. paid him $4,000 For this
transaction Mr.. Garfield has been charged
with having corruptly sold his official in
fueuce for a $4,000 bride. Mr.. Garfield
and his friends assert that he acted
simply as lawyer and that the money was
a legitimate legal fee.
The following is an extract from the Re
vised Statutes of the United States, page
81, enacted June 18th, 1864:
SEC 1882. No Senator, Representative
or Delegate, after his election, and during
his continuance in Office, and no head of a
Department or other officer or clerk in the
employ of the Government shall receive or
agree to receive any compensation what
ever, directly or indirectly, for any service
rendered or TO be rendered to any person.
either by himself or another, in relation to
any proceeding contract, claim, controver-
sy, charge, accusation, arrest or other mat
ter or thing in which the United States is
a party, or directly or indirectly interested
before any Department, Court Martial, Bu-
reau, Officer, or any civil, military, or naval
commission whatever. Every person of
Tending against this section shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be i'm
prisoned not more than two years, end fined
%bar tan 1a11 nd
shall moreover, by conviction therefor
be rendered forever thereafter incapable of
holding any Office of honor, trust or profit
under the Government of the United States. |
That Garfield rendered the services and
received the money is shown by the testi-
mony of his partner, Richard G. Parsons,
who testified before the COMMITTEES as fol- |
lows:
In the spring of 1872, II think in April,
was retained by Mr.. Chittenden, as lao. |
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
EXPLANATION.

Messrs. FitzGerald and Whitfield were not
mentioned in connection with the report CT the
case Of Turner ct al VS.. Turner. ct al from
the Chancery Court of Yalobusha county, in
last weeks CLARION. These gentlemen, with
Mr.. Geo. H.. Lester, represented the appel
lants, and secured a reversal Of the decree.
If their brief was with the files at the time the
report was made, it was overlooked
The case of Holden vs. Davis, from the Cir
cult Court of Adams county, is reported as
having been decided by Judge North Alo
though the record shows no interchange, the
fact is, L learn, that the Hon. J. B. Chrisman
presided in the trial of the case His judg-
ment was affirmed.
The following cases, heretofore appearing,
in THE CLARION are to be reported;
No. 3lO4-Crawford Hays vs. The State.
No 3325-G W. Tipler vs.. The State
No. 3i50-Lewis Jones VS.. The State
L. BRAMR.
Supreme Court adjourned for the term on
Saturday the 10Th inst.
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
Let Gen. Garfield Explain.
Philadelphia Times

Philadelphia Times
Gen. Garfield will make grave mistake if
he shall affect to ignore the serious charges
which meet him at the very outset of his cam
paign for the Presidency. They are not the
whisperings of anonymous slanderers, nor
the rank growth of partisan calumny which
may spring up in a night at the feet of the
purest man in public life so soon as he re-
ceives a nomination for the Presidency
Every President al candidate from Washing
ton down has had to trample upon that sort
of thing, and not one of them was the worse
for 1t in the end. But now for the first time
in the history Of this country does great
party present as its candidate one whose per
sonal and official integrity has been impeached
by the result ola congressional investigation.
If Gen. Garfelds friends suppose that can
didacy so beclOuded will receive the appre-
val or liberation of the American people,
when the facts are understood they are sad
ly m. AIKEN, and in the spirit of kindness he
and they should be undeceived at once The
credit mobilier scandal is still fresh in the
memory of all Eight years ago it was ex
posed to public view, and it is unnecessary to
tell the story over again. Suffice it to say
that the disclosures made by a congressional
committee of investigation were death to
many fair reputation.
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
JAMES JOHNSON, !
vs.. No. 3445.
NJ. J. JOHNSON.
hite s Bradshaw, for appellants.
ITO be reported

Error TO the Chancery Court Of Clay Coun-
ty, Hon. L. Brame, Chancellor
The appellee filed her bill for divorce upon
the ground of habitual cruel and inhuman
treatment, marked by personal violence, and
for the custody of child two years old. 1t
was objected that the wife could not in any
case sue the husband in her own name; that
she in this under twenty-one years
OF age ard, for that reason, could only sue
by next friend, but these questions were
raised by the answer at the hearing, and not
by demurrer or plea in abatement. The
Chancellor overruled the objections, and after
hearing the testimony at length granted the
relief. The complainants deposition was
taken and was objected to as incompetent
The Chancellor sustained the objection, except
as to such parts Of the testimony of the wife,
as related TO acts Of personal violence infict-
ed upon her by the husband. The Chancellor
was of opinion that the exception TO the COM
mon law rule, which made the wife a compe-
tent witness against the husband in a crimi-
nal prosecution for personal injuries to her,
authorized the same testimony in her favor
when cruel and inhuman treatment was by
the statute made ground for divorce. This
question is the only noticed in the opinion,
and as the case was remanded for another
hearing it is TO be assumed that the other
questions are resolved in favor Of the decree
below.
Held
l. The incompetency of parties occupying
the martial relation as witnesses for or
against each other, as it existed at common
law, exists now, except where it has been clear
ly and plainly removed by statute.
z. The wife can be examined a witness
against the husband only in a criminal prose-
cution against him for a personal injury in.
hicted upon her. Byrd -. The State, decided
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
The De Gc.lyer Matter.
New York Star.

New York Star.
Extract from letter written to his prin-
cipals by one Chittenden, agent for the Chi
cage firm of De Golyer & Mcclellan, con-
tractors for wooden pavements under the
infamous Shepherd Ring at Washington in
1872:
"To-days and to-nighfs ,cork has secured
the assistance Of Gen. Garfield. You cannot
orerate the importance Of this accession. He is
Chairman Of The Committee on appropriations
and holds the purse strings Of the National
Treasury. Through him must come erery
dollar Of appropriations. I,eed not say that
I rlole feel certain Of success"
The man who held ''the purse strings Of
the National Treasury" did not disappoint
the expectations based on Chittenden's belief
in his venality. According to his own tes-
timony before the Investigating Committee
he received $1,000 for his influence and
service in putting this infamous job through.
And this is the man whom the Chicago Con-
vention has nominated for President of the
United States
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
REPORTED BY c. c. CAMPBELL.

SATURDAY. June 10, 1880.
The following cases were affirmed:
3zz9-Geo. v. Bishop, ct al vs. Charles Rosen-
baum
S269-s. P. Gibbons y J. ". McAlexander,
et al.
3270-Menken Bros. vs. Samuel F ark, ct a..
33l9-N- L. Nugent, ct al vs. Leyee Commits
sioners
3406-Henry Bjssinger, Is. J. VI Lawson
54l0-C. ". Jordan, e. al VS.. JOS }. McGee,
adm'r
342l-Eliza R. Walker, ct al, vs. H. G, Hum
phries, ct al.
3i56-ET Parts Mike Higgins, Ha5eas Cor
pas. -.
The following cases were reversed and re-
manded
3045-J. H. .. Bowman. ct al * ors- IS. ".
l. Montgomery, Ct al.
3zlo-Jas- Williams, supt- etc, vs.. ;. I. Par
6er et al.
3235-R J. Mccall, Guardian, vs.. J. W Heuis.
5322-Capitol State Bank, V. Hartwen \
Chambers
3332-Jne. J. Cuin, vs. Thomas Kelly.
}3I5-R. L. Dunn, et al vs.. E. H Kelly.
3371-James Holbrook, vs.. Robinson < Ste
842l-Elien Weaver. V. 4. E. Norwood Ell al.
3445-James Johnson, rs, Margaret J. john
8483-Jas. Williams. V. 5. 7. Parker, ct al.
Dismissed
3455-J. : Hoskins, vs. J. J. Baker Reversed
and Information dismissed.
The Court adjourned SINE die.
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
vlrginia's Mixed Jury Case.
AN IMPORTANT DECISION OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF TIE UNITED STATES RE
CALLED.
] une 23d, lS4
{ 70 be CoHtinueaI

Az r,,po-nqr w, I,,,l,-----,-
~ i'i Ran iE'l0i'N Or ~ 7lFELHE
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES pr-
c.rtr,
CALLED
DAHyITrF Va limo IL -rl-.r.1-
''' ,''"
Ced case OF the reynolds negroes, which
was remanded from, the TrpircJ -+gt.. Ds.-
.'.'' i''7
trIeV Court hlVes, judge, to the Circuit
Court of Patrick County. cama. mn for trial
tneFe last week, ana on motion of their
counsel the venue was changed 10 the Cir
unit C,,r+ % D,r--;f1- H.
'
special yeulre has been ordered for their
trial here On the DIST mat
'i''
I nne 49, nolIses were lnaIcieI pa t4e state
80 III ~ - "Iuer. a In"ilon io 81 modify t1r
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23
THE CLARION FOR THE CAMPAIGN.

Without neglecting any Of the multi
tudinous matters that have given inter
est and popularity to THE CLARION,
we would remind our readers that we
intend to make it, as usual, a frst-cIass
CAMPAIGN PAPER, from now until the
election. Voters who wish to cast their
suffrage intelligently, and campaigners
who ought to be posted, in order that
they may discuss the issues and the can
didates properly, should send on their
orders at once. Our next number will
open with a broadside Of especial value.
The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1880-06-23

bv this Court at last term, where the author
tiles are reviewed A proceeding for divorce
is a civil and not a crimina proceeding, and is
conducted, cas- other suits in chancery. Code,
1773.
8. The case of Hays v Hays, l9 Wis, 1877,
which holds that the wife may testify against
the husband is based upon the statute of that
State-tThe statute of Wis. is in effect exactly
similar TO z 7j6, code lS7l). The following
cases reject the distinction taken by the chan
celior WoodruF V. Woodruff, 10. Vt. 40
QUINN v Quinn ? Fairfield, 42I
The principles of construction adopted by
this court in Byrd v The State were applied IN
divorce cases, and the parties held TO be incom
petent as witnesses in DcsHy v. D5cstty, 40
Maine 81, and Manchester V. Manchester 70 VI
$40
l. Rejecting the deposition of complainant,
the decree is not supported by the evidence.
The parties in this case are young and IN
experienced They both seemed TO have undu-
" given way to ebulitions of high temper
WITH more restraint in this respect and with
more consideration for the feelings and rights
of each other ii is not too much TO hope, that
this ineffectual attempt at a haaI separation
may lead TO reconciliation, aud life OF use
fulness and happiness.
Reversed and remdHdsd
Opinion by GEORGE, c. j.
Fred Beall, for plaintiff in error.
White x Bradshaw, contra.
To be reported