Clarksville weekly chronicle. (Clarksville, Tenn.) 1873-1890, 1880-02-21
Proceedings of the Chancery Courl
at February Term, 1850.


Morgan & Cows jackson, AfcRernon 4 Co. |
Confirming report of c. &M. n
Evans, Fife, Porter ~ Co. VS. Lyle, Var
brough ct ais. Pro confesso,
Evans, Fite, Porter & Cows Lyle, Jones ct
ais Pro confesso.
Evans, Fife, Porter q Co. VS. Lyle, Harper
ct ais. Pro confesso.
Morgan & Co. VS. Jackson, MeKernon &
Herndon vs. Hernden. Appointing guafd-
ian ad Item. !.
Hambaugh & Goodlett VS. Roberts Of ais.
Ordering sale of unsold lots.
Polk G. Johnson, G. a. M. Appointing
committee to investigate general report OF
/ G. I'm.
Hume VS. Hume. Appointing guardian
ad Item.
Carkuf ct ais. VS. Carkuff ct ais. Appoint-
ing guardian I'D Item ks ~ Sa4
Anderson VS. Moseley. Dismissing bill as
to Moseley and 8. b. & Sue M. Seat.
BOrdman vs. Willis. Ordering payment
to Furnish, admir-.
Lindley VS. Lindley. Ordering scire faclas
to issue.
Polk G.Johnson. 9. & NJ. Report Of COM
mittee and confirming report of @. & M.
Morrison VS. Morrison Giving title to Py-
thayoras Lodge, No. %. E $50 A4
ogburn VS. Brown. Ordering title to R. H.
Ogburn. N
higgins VS. Barbee. Ordering title to SUI
sannah Barbee.
Merritt q Fort VS. Thomas Ordering title
to H. c. Merritt.
Caldwell vs. Dixon. Ordering titls. and
Judgment.
West vs. weaver. Ordering title TO John
Minor.
West VS. Weaver. Ordering title TO A OAR
nell and F. NJ. Yarbrough.g Ft
Ewing VS. Hitter. Ordering title to @. NJ.
johnson.
Poston VS. POstOn. Ordering title 70 Il. 9.
Merritt. 49,
Grifey VS. Goodlett. Ordering title to VIM.
Parker.
Neblett VS. orgain. Ordering re-sale.f
johnson VS. SMALL Confirming report OF
sale.
Morgan VS. Bryan. Confirming report Of
sale.
: Mitchell, Louis a Co VS. Daniel q Johnson.
Motion to dismiss bill and discharge attach
J ment. #E ts FFtl
. Wright VS. Harris. Pro confesso.
Merritt VS. Leavell. Order to pay Mrs.
Leavell taxes paid by her.
| -soilAtn tS w AA1ldluSOL. ElnAI ORDER.
Wright VS. Lyle. Pro confesso.
Herndon VS. Herndon. Order of reference
to G. &M
Clardy VS. Innes. Appointing guardian ad
Item.
Linebaugh VS. Paine. Canceling sale and
ordering acct.
Cobb, Kennedy ct ais. VS. Dortch. Appoint
ing special Commissioner and ordering re-
/ f.of, .I,f, Z
Cops VS. Cops Cause dismissed.
Shackelford VS. Henry. Order Of reference.
Hume VS. Hume. Order OF reference.
Smith VS. Buck. Revived in name of P.
G. Johnson, admir-. -
Pardue VS. Williams Ordering sale Of
property.
Pollard VS. Wilcox. Order ofreference.
Merritt VS. Jno. X. Smith. Reviving order
of sale.
Dick VS. Caldwell & Shelton. Dismissfng
, bill at cost complt.
, Russell VS. Eldridge. Stricken from dock
ct for want of prosecution.
Elliott VS. Wilson. Cause dismissed.
: Major VS. Current. Order of sale revived.
Trahern VS. Wootton. Order Of sale. e.
Coulter VS. Tyson. Order Of sale revived.
Moore VS. Dick. Order of resale.
Wiley VS. Fentress. Order to pay taxes to
Averitt.
Bradley vs. johnson. Compromise and ex-
ecution ordered.
Daniel VS. Mimms. Dismissing cross bill.
Bowman VS. overton. Former orders re-
newed
'Doak VS. Lockert. CONFIRMING report on
Doak's compensation.
Stacker VS. Lewis. Confirming report Of
sale
Hamburger & GoodIettvs Roberts. Amend
ing former order.
Elder VS. Elder. Order of sale revived.
Shelton VS. Outlaw. Confirming report of
c. & M. and ordering sale of one-half Arme-
stead land.
Massie & Wife VS. Jordan. Confirming re-
port of sale and to report OF Merrittis fee.
Beaumont rs Beaumont. Reference as to
taxes.
Keats VS. Mathis Final decree.
Mimms VS. Ewing. Order of reference.
Grange Warehouse VS. Buck & higgins.
Consolidating cause with West VS. Weaver.
Smith VS. King. Order for scirafacias.
Watts VS. Watts. Order for sale and to col
lect debts.
Lockert VS. Brockman. Order of refer
ence.
Sutcliff & Carter VS. Branch & Crutchheld.
Appointment of admir-.
Neblett VS. Organ. Fee of guardian ad IL
tenn ordered.
Batson VS. Cochran. Order to supply rec
ord.
+. Sutclif & Carter VS. Johnson. Bill dis
missed at cost of complt. 81 EF# Fs
Moseley VS. Pace. Decree upon compro-
| mise. A-- - - 49, e.
Peacher VS. Peacher. Allowing w. w.
Peacher to pay purchase money and order
ing fund paid to w. H. McCauIey.
Williams VS. Dortch. Pro confesso or
dered.
i Merritt VS. McT3ee. Confirmation Of sale,
and order for writ of possession.
Turnkey, Ely Co. VS. NoIen. Report of
sale confirmed.
Evans, Fife, Porter & Co. VS. Lyle, Jones ct
ais. Giving judgment to complts. and order
ing sale of property.
Herndon VS. Parish. Report of sale con-
firmed ff.sff33.
Johnson, admir- and rec'r, VS. Martin. Re-
viving order of sale.
Dotson VS. Haynes. Pro confesso.
Clardy VS. Innes. Order of reference.
Johnson VS. Smith. Pro confesso, and ap-
pointing guardian ad litem.
Turner VS. Purdam & Keesee. Final de-
Tyson VS. Tyson. Reviving order for ac-
count.
Smith VS. King. Ordering sale
Dick VS. Harris. Bill dismissed at cost Of
complt.
| Holt VS. Holt. Final decree.
Mimms VS. Mimms. Order for report.
/ Batson VS. Merritt, admir-. Consolidating
cause with Batson VS. Batson.
| Merritt VS. Robbins Dismissed at cost of
defendant.
Wilson VS. Wilson. Order Diminishing
Albert White VS. NJ White. order dismiss
ing cause.
Merritt Us Hawkins. Dismissed at cost Of
complt +Ht
Griffey VS. Goodlett. Order of reference.
Roach q Dick VS. Bailey. Dismissed at
cost of complts.
Wright VS. Harris. Ordering sale.
Greenfield VS. Barker. Confirming report
as to compensation of admir-.
West VS. Weaver. Order to pay Judgment
in favor of Wilder in circuit court
Bordman VS. Willis. Order revfvfng In
name J.J. West, admir- and to pay over