Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1880-01-16
sunrems Court for chit.ensen County.

Srrra-na ccurt far Chi+tnn5er County
Hos. L,Hfs B,naEII. ...,
he Ii"S I,S S'r,, ~, ''' '''''' hi
los. WnEEiock q. vfA2EY.
T,-rsn,y Ian g
u,,..,,,,. p..,.. c.a.t,a,;nl l,1o5,,irh
~ h1.
J'rI ~, n,. ~ "''it ga - ~
car,I,,,, .,,,a,Ii :, ~; LII III !,
-, ,',,'a,,i'', Ill - ''' NJ. 49,.
~ III, is.',,.t.,,, "a - -
,. ~, .'I '''e a
~ ,'l', - ~ '''''' IN
',r,;,.','i I ,;,,' - ~, wa, ~"
nv. m ,L' ''r ,,i ,' , Inns ~, in,t,,i
,ii9 gu VI" 1'','' '',,,'' '''"5i y i'''''"''N
i''' sy''. :''I I'' ~ 's 'ii' MI "''S
i'' S'''.'i tisio'c !l"nSi,r 81 thc T!picr'y aS
T" P,''''' 1t "Iail'>l d, uicIiII's 'ir'ill"rS ~
ic"'''i'' ~" lam, ''it' "i." was 'dNSn
on cAec"tl"h lle "'hGei return WIS ihsuih
e'I.ii anu 'il' inc SHIT 10 Niis- hu'c WIS Il
valid one.
W; L. hnrhap i"r rhhh'liis u '.
''i'Ii,''''i, W. u5'cHi,I'-
nv bis ,rcnt + , Wnodirr,. b.,d Jo'Iin,s
with the late f. W Chase (of whose estate
defendant is administrator and at the time
of the lattcr's death there was in his shop
some eight hundred dollars worth of lumber
obtained of Woodbury.. Plaintiff claimed
that the lumber was sent TO Chase to he
worked up into doors, etc, and defendant
| that it was regularly sold, plaintiff to take
his pay in the manufactured goods. Yer
dict for plaintiff in County Court and car
ricd to this court on exceptions by defend
ant.
+. r. Hard for plaintiff WhltcmOre 4
Wheeler and C.. J. AlIcr for defendant.
H. s. B'ao8'rt IS N"'td"r f"r. Defend
ant, WIN others sl.ned l"int ami several
note Tor Sloo which read we as principals
promise, etc. lie subsequently claimed that
he sisned the note mere y as surety In the
county Court the presiding Judge ruled de
ifndant $ testimony inadmlssihe and direct
ed veruicl ior plaihllh ana 'ne case now
comes before TINS court on exceptions ny ue-
iendant
;. liasclton for plaintiff {. ;. Palmer for
defendant
WmHjt SaAderN5H rs CA0rles OSg0od In
| County Court plaintiff recovered 500 of de
PENDANT ON the charge OF b;rs;ardy. In that
trial plaintiff introduced paper written by
her, at her cuunsrfs request, To compare
with letter introduced in the case and
claimed to he in her handwriting, rs proof
that both were written by the same person;
and the case comes before this court on de
PENDANTS exception on that point
H. ii. Start Tor rlalntlif; T.. X. Hard for
defendant
state q. Ch'ra ChdmPcaH. At the last
term OF Chiitenden County Court defendant
was convicted on the charge OF keeping
house Of ill-iamc. Her counsel, however,
had entered motion to qiash the III
dlctment IN the nature ol n plea III
abatement on the ground OF the Illegal
drawing oil the grand Jury. counsel
claimed that the DRAWN" was not in accord
ance WIN the statute that the statute re
quircs that the names be placed in a box and
drawn out by the sheriff that IN Tact list
ni the names OF the burlington, south Bur
lh@l"h ana colchester grant jurors was
numbered anu inc numbers written on cards
anu tIa' inc cards We're drawn ny the sheriff
anu 'l'c "ii'siui''i''5 hai'cs laceu on 'he
lls' as grant jurors; he county court de
nie'' nv ,i''''r anu ''ic 'lST toii's "ci1.e
'1lls court on eN''l'i"hS Nv ueier''iht I" 'hiS
u'TIS'"h-
II, = Isch anu W. IL iA'r i,r Htale
I-u"aiu hi""n'h anu H. ho'ei's l"f