The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1880-11-09
COMMlssIONER's NOTICE..
GUILD & CARRINGToN. TRUSTEES,
" VS.. MACFARLASUs ADMINISTRATORS
&c ~ TUE cuAycEnY COURT OF THE CITY OF RICH.
- MONp.

OULD & CARRINGToN. TRUSTEES,
" VS.. MACFARLASD's ADMINISTRATORS
~ THE cuAycEny COURT OF TIE CITY OF RICH
MoNp.
The following is a copy OF the decree entered In
this cause on the 26th day OF june, 1880:
This cause came on thus day to be heard on the
missioner Thomas J.. Evans. dated July rs,
1873, aad filed september 3, 1873. The va va
:ious exceptions thIreto hereinafter noted, the
separate reports OF said commissioner OF The ac-
couals from year 20 year between Ould& Caring
ton. trustees, under the deed or October 20. I57O
and the trust estate up 10 aud Including ION OF
March. 1879, and the subsequent separate account
of sad ru sees settled by ssd commissioner ana re-
turned on l7,h MAY, 1879. and was argued hy
counsel. ON cuns'dera' lon whereof. no exception
having been fled TO the said SEPARATE accounts OF
TIE transactions of the said trustees with the trust
estaie. up 10 and including The account dated NAV.
IT. 1879, and the Court approving The same, the
said separate accounts are hereby conhrmei. Ana
for reasons stated IN wr Ing ana lied WIN me re"
cord and made part thereof, the Court doth now
proceed 10 dispoe Of the exceptions % the report
filed September 8. 1873, aud doth adjudgc, order
I Tine Court sustaips the exception OF the heirs
Of Powha'an Roberts, and doth decide that the
Judgment, held by BeazeeS's administrator Is not a
hen on the one half of the net proceeds OF the DOCK
ot IN Richmond but taat said one half belongs TO
the es' ate OF Powhstan Roberts subject only 70 any
claim thereon arising from the suietyshlp OF VIII
liam II. Hscfarlapd upon the bond OF 4. X. hoOerts
10 Ashiin. as set forth In the bill in this cause.
2. The Court doth override the exception OF Ould
x C8rriugtOn to the ruilDR OF the court III iticr-
nee 10 Tie mining rights In the county OF GoocE.
Isud. SOLD by the said trustees TO Thomas Dram.
doth confirm the report OF the commissioner that
the jodement of BeaZeley's administrator Is a trst
Hen on the net proce, DIS Of said sale. And II ap-
peaiing from examination OF The accounts afore-
SAID that the net proceeds CT sale 10 Thomas Gram
are the sum Of OIL 6.57, OF The 9Th day OF May,
1874, ana that said fund forms part Of the fund
invested BY the trustees OUld Car rington, II Is
adiudged, ordered, and decreed that the said Oud
CalriDgton. trustees, DO co,ecf sufficient amount
of the trust fund Invested by them, and do pay 10
William b. Weslbrook, administrator OF X. II.
Beazeey, deceased or 10 Mann L. Siringfellow. his
from the 9th day of May, 1874. which payment
shau be credited upon the Judgment of Beszeley' 5
3. 'rhe Court doth sustain the exception of Ran
dO Bsrksdale 10 said report. and doth decide that
the claim Of said Randolph BarkSdale against VII.
liam H. Macfailand shal be allowed to The extent OF
the sum OF *7I00. as of The l5th OF jane, 1862,
bat that the same Is Confederate debt and is to be
a. The exceptions Of the plaintiffs TO the allow
ance OF The claim OF Pcter w. Woodief, and the ex-
ceptiOn Of r. w. smith TO he allowance Of the same
cai, aud also the exception OF The children of Will
liam H. maciailan1 and wife, to the rejection OF the
claim Of the executors OF Andrew Bierne, are sus-
tained but 10 the extent only that the Court decides
that boh Of said claims should lie the subject OF fur-
Their inquiry and report by The commissioner, WIN
leave to any party 10 interest to introduce iurlhtr
in respect thereto.
In all other respects the said r. port Of Commits
sioner Evans OF July 20 SIS, Is hereby confirmed.
that the said repoit Is hereby recommitted 10 said
ommissioDer Evans, who shall reform the same ac-
cordng 10 the principles OF This decree.
And said commissioner shall specially inquire and
report 10 whom and in what proportions the one
half OF the net proceeds of The Dock lot hertinbe-
fore mentioned shall be paid under the principles
here,nbefo'C decTeed
2. Whether the CAIN of Woodief against Mac
farland hiss paid IN whole IN psr, and what,
II anything. is due and owing on acc unit of this
claim TO the said Peter W. Woodlief and Francis III.
smith, respectively, or 10 either OF them.
3 Whist, if anything, Is due from the estate OF
lillian II. mcfarland on the claim assef ted by the
executors OF Aodrew Beirne. and set forth In The
peiion ~ respect thereto, flied by some Of the chit
iren Of William Il. Maefar!aDd ana to whom 1t is
iue.
4. What, il anything is due on the claim asserted
"A The petition fled in this cause by the devsees of
PbIlip St. George Cooke.
The commissioner will continue the annual settle
nent of the accounts of the trustees.
The com missioner will report his proceedings.
CnMMIs sIONER's OFFICER
RICHMOND, October 10, 1880.
The parties interested are hereby notified that
nave fixed on FRIDAY the 10Th day of November,
$50, at ~ O'Clock ~. as the time, and my office,
IN Eleventh be ween Main and Bank streets, as the
place, 10 execute the foregoing decree.
THOMAS j, EVANS.