The Douglas independent. [volume] (Roseburg, Or.) 187?-1885, 1880-10-16
COURT DOCKET

1 VouST AH@hEHs
relieving ID the docket for the osto-
Der term Of the sirouit court for this
county.
State Of Oregon, resp, vs.. Kennedy
| . Strickland, app; appeal from iuss
tice's court from costs.
State of Oregon, W John o,Neal, ct
al; recognisance.
State Of Oregon W Jas. ,. LEWIS;
rscognisance.
State Of Oregon, vs 8. Ninard; ap-
peal froa taxation Of costs.
Cyrus Williams vs W. B. williams
and J. B. Dixon; action to recover
money.
| A. A. Fink VS. C. d q. r. Co.; in
junction.
II. 8. Marsh W Hawley, Dodd Co.,
and Wheeler Bros; action to recover
heney and damages.
Ellen ]. Long ct al W p. Griswoid
and wife, action to recover real prop
erty.
Ellen ]. Leng OF al VI Henry Land
ers; same.
WI Alexander vs. 8. Minard; ac-
| ton to recover real estate and damages.
N. J. Courtney vs. z. Kubly ct al;
Injunction.
Sugar Pine Milling Co. W. T. C.
Alexander ct al; suit to enforce lien.
9. Plymale VS. J. J. Comstock, suit
in equity for specific performance. R.
G. Ebert, resp, We Henry Conn, app;
suit to recovery money.
w. s. Frazier, resp, VS. l. vanar-
burg. app; appeal from Justices
Court.
8. Ainare, app, VS. county court of
Douglas county, reap; appeal from
assessment of damages.
John Stanley, resp, vs. w. P. Day
and Fl. Stanley. app; appeal from
Justices court.
f. r. Hill vs Jas. T. Cooper; sun in
equity to recover rent profits.
Ida May Crow VS. Henry Crow, di-
vorce.
Sugar Pine Mill Co. VS. a. G. Grow. to
recover msney.
w. w. Thayer ct al VS. A. J. Man
ming ct 81; suit to set aside fraudulent
conveyance.
D. NcMullen ct al Va Abraham,
Whesler q Co.; suit 10 foreclose me
chanics lien.
Samuel FEEDER VS. caro- Bros; to re-
cover money.
D. N. and E. Waller d Co w Caro-
Bros; to recover money.
J. 8. Reed VS. Wells and Flock; to
recover money.
s.Neustadter Bros. We Wells and Flock:
same.
Wilmsrding and Co. VS. R. Cameron;
same.
Martin d Go vs. Il Cameron; same.
J L Pike and Son VS. ] T Daniel ct al;
same,
John C. Aiken VS. Isador Caro-; fore
closures
Clark and Mayhew vs. Vim. Badger;
to recover money.
w. w. Thayer OF al VS. ]. N. Barker;
foreclosure.
w q Isean VS. o Bldwell; foreclosure.
10 Booth vs. L B Stark and E Dod-
saAs action to recover real property.
John B Hodges vs. o Gosline; action
to recover money.
James Palsy vs. Myron Bidwell,
foreclosure
L 6tenger VS. Z Cameran ct al; same.
r Smith and Co VI Shook and Moore;
same.
A P Hotaling and Co. vs. ] 8 Aiken;
same.
Fenkhausen and Braunschweiger vs.
George 4 Beath; same.
Flsckenstsin and Mayer VS. W. Steel,
same.
Sugar Pine Milling Co. VS. A o Cas-
ton; action to recover personal prop
erty and damages.
P s Gosline VS. Sugar Pine Milling
Co; action to recover money.
Ordenstein and Co. vs. Geo A Beath; !;
action to recover money.
e g Young ct al rs e snsok ct al;
| same.
,Cyron Mynatt. respondent, vs Henry
Bushnell, app; appeal from Justices
court
RR Duncan vs Martha E Duncan;
divorce.
Alvira Miracle Va Joel Miracle; di-
vorce.
Elizabeth Howard VS. c II Howard;
divorce.
Lovina Holt vs Jas W Holt; divorce.
Charlotte A Gabriel vs w P Gabriel;
divorce.
R w Kslchain VS. Nary Kelchain;
divorce.
| State Of Oregon vs Douglas county
Road Company; aseion to annul the
charter of corporation,
l. r Mosher vs.; confirmation
Thos Morris VS. 4 Dawson; assign :