, 1880-09-12

Mr.. Barber has been given In Lake county dne
highest number OF votes to which he can1ay
ciaiu1. The probabilities are that Mr: farwsll,
in addition to receiyin4t the known votes OF the
delegates from Shields and Deerted! will also
get that Of the delegate from Cuba, and vii also
pick up two or three more votesin Lake County:
he will have. however. enough 70 nominate a1n
even without these additions.
FIFTEENTH.
The primary in this ward was held at the cor
ner Of Larrabee and wisconsin streets. Az
or quietly. For about IN. hour after the polls
opened it was nip and tuck between what was
tsw tss: and wash Gn bSfass nsaSs
as confident As, they were enthusiastic. and
worked like heavers toelect their men: Abyut I1s
hulf-past s., however, the wind was etleotually
taken cut Of their sails By a perfect avalanche
Of Furwell men, who descended upon the
Po aaa soop Tpsa ped 0oe ood ts or WaaSoupne Sps
jority for the Farwell ticket being LII. The fol-
lowing were .c!ected: =, :, ':''
$S$; BSS HHs ~
VS.. Young. Jr, Conrad folz.
George Gloki =;
The Republican primaries IN, this ward re-
suited in the election Of the Farwen delegates
crowd surrounding the polls all the time, but It
was q good-natured crowd. and nothing q an
exciting or unusual nature occurred Inef9
were but two tickets in the field. one mixed
Washburue- Barber ticket with five delegates
FOR. Barber and three for Washburne, ana the
other an outrand1out ,FarWell :tcket u WIS ..as
tight, and that the contract was between Fur
well and Barber. which, in the great measure.
accounts fo tie majority By wera cas3 sn4
5j votes in all, Of which the .Furwell ticket re
ceiyed 3Sl and the Barber Washhurne one l49
The:names Of the successful delegates are as
Henry Henry Soverin, CIV. Kirk. y
". s: :Melien, George Kleinhaus,
Fr{7 Frn5 Far!tea9 F5,l!agn ftsp frea Ksemer Ies1
The defeated ticket was composed Of the fol-
lowing: William Stewart, Theodore StinmtIg.
dens Luther ". Mcdonnell, Jacob Walk mann,
Julius Kaehler~: ,
issue wa was Farwcli ard anti-Farwell. Two tick
cts were in the icld. and, though there was Con-
siderable excitement, everything pissed OF
Which the FarweI ticket received SIS and the
anti-Farwell 1853. The delegates elected were as
I'm SSsSmss, HSasesy' :; T.! Hss;tsH@s T. s5ssnssn,
T-G. Moran, :; !. Lawrence Hessolworth.
I'll They are Tor Farwell first. last, and all the
't.'1' :. Observation-Disclosures WINS. :
Unusual interest attached to the primary ~
Mr. M s; wasnburnes p' own ward and partly because
Of the recent and highly personal differences en-
gendered by the heat Of theprelmtnary canvass.
Naturally the vote was very largeTlarger il,
fact, than at any primary with one exception
ever held IN the ward tn total vote G p9e LED
result In favor of the Wushburne as against tue
mixed FarweIl- Barber ticket By vote Of S3s t. t.
The py one yree
a.. The Office should seek the man, not the man
the office" = man should refuse to serve bis
eSe of tho shea eaM9sr o. % France a eeneata
peIla1ion. ned npTh The Watea: Dog of Tie Treasury
aad e@nl!er Ra bavine Ssen rs
Souses as seq? The he dee
T. ffnsss 4: Hrnod, an eitia "sfs' Louis :o'Neiil,
Caspar Butt, Philip Enders,
| Abijah Keith, Henry BAusher, Jr., ~
| Jacob Doser, William Floto,
| j B. Hobbs, George y. Ciark,
= The he opposition ticket was headed Regular
~ r ". King, E. j: McCagg. James Flower, Il. W
| Cross, Joseph Kohn. Alb; Jones, james Gieg.
| horn, Fred Obergfeldt, John ONei!l, Joseph 5
| Droukmnn. Rul Fronmhold, and c. W. Fuller
! OF these, Cross, Kohn, Jones' and Gleghorn rep
| resented the Union Veteran Club, Of the Nortf
] Side, and, as near rs could be gotten at, were
evenly split up between Farwell and Barber
| The other Barber men we're supposed to be
Flower, O'Neill. and Fuller, The remainder OF
| the ticket was understood to be FarWell. The
! rumOr got abroad during the afternoon thai
| Barrier had repuiiated the ticket, and advised
| his friends TO vote The Washburne combination
| The Furwell men, who we're jubllant in the be-
lief that their ticket WIS destined to win, init
| mated that the supposed Burher men, On IL
| might, in exchange fur. this Reputation. repu'
d.ate Mr. Barber In the Convention: The rutno
| and the talk had no perceptft,ie effect on tht
| voting, however, and the result was decided,
| different from what the Farwell men had hopet
| it would be. The fact that their ticket wa
! headed by.Henry ". King was, Of itself; calcu.
t lated to capture some who would .otheTwiss
| have fought shy of the nobodtcs ut tht
| tuil OF It. Whatever influence Mr. King
name might have carried With it, however: WA
cieverly overcome by the assidufty Of Mr: Willing
| in circulating the following telegram which IL
had received from Mr.. King, In answer to onf
sent out early in the days. =,
| WHITE RIVER JUNCTION, VI. Sept IL, 18s0.-H
! F. Willing: You may say that will not accept a
| delegate. a. " KING:
The only other literature, outside OF the tickets
circulated about the polls, was translation OF :
| personal attack on Nr- E. F. SraRtu, which ap
peared" In morning paper yesterday: Ins
| only percepttble effect 1t had was to 1ncreasa
/ the number uf votes IN favor: OF Mr. Cfag1n
candidate. and to show the poputnr disapprova
| Of my and all such tactics. - =.
Both sides got out I'LL the voting strength Tue.
| could muster. and If the polls Ind remained
| ho,,r no f,tf3u Rtll