Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1880-01-21
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT.

SAN FRANCISCO, january ~, 1850.
6SS1-Gower ct al. VS.. Andrews-M ltlOn denied.
In the matter Of the class OF applicants Ordered
that the members OF the class examined on FRIDAY
who have heretofore been admitted TO practice in
any of the District Courts, may present themselves
Tor further examination Saturday, February 2lst
and the other members of the class may present
themselves for further examination the first day
OF the July sc sion.
Victor ii. Metcalf admitted to practice on motion
of II. Z. Mchoon and license from the Supreme
Court OF New York
6916-Cali. Ornia Furniture Company vs. Hon
Charles +. Halsey, Judge of the Tenth Depart
ment OF the Superior Court OF the city and county
OF San Francisco-On motion of E F. Preston and
petition fle ordered that an alternative writ OF
certiorar issue, returnabIe before Department No
,, on Wednesday, January q, 1850, at o'clock p NJ
Theodore Z. Blochmau admitted to practice on
motion Of w. II. l. Barnes and license from the
Unit States Supreme Court.
62Sl-Davis VS.. HUgln-On motion Of Tilden for
appellant ordered that the appeal herein be and the
same is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
6y04-Bowdoin vs.. Sanford On motion of Bergin
for respondent and Clerks certificate and notice of
motion fle ordered that the appeal herein be and
the same is hereby dismissed.
54ll-felton VS.. Robinson-Motion of Bergin for
appellant to hear cause in banc submitted.
66ls-Pickett VS.. Wallace ct al.-Motion to dismiss
appeal on Clerks certificate and notice Of motion on
file argued by Wilson for respondent and Pickett in
propria persona for appellant and cause submit ted.
(SIcKee, j., and Mckinstry, j., not sitt,ng)
cisco VS. Herman ct al.-0n motion of Cope for ap-
pellants, bo ordered to be heard in Depart
ment No. l.
5SS2-Durkee VS.. Central Pacific Railroad Com
pany-Cause ordered to be heard in Department
No. l.
Ordered that all cases on the criminal calendar be
heard in banc.
65e6 Robbins ct al vs. Hope ct al-on motion
of Pringle cause ordered the San Francisco term
calendar.
6s97-Robinson vs. Dibbe ct al-Motion of Prn-
gle for appellant to hear the III banc sub
mitted.
6G35-Estate Of Hinckey-M Motion of Barbour for
appellant to hear the cause in banc submitted.
DEPARTMENT NO. l.
5SS2-Durkee VS.. Cent al Pacific Railroad Com
pany-A' gued by Bergin for appellant and by
Haynes for respondent, and further argument con-
tinued until To morrow at 10 o'clock A. NJ.
6yl7-Bateman the superior Court of San
Francisco and bon. William p. Daingerfeld, Presid
ing Judge thereOf-On motion Of Muliany and on
fling petition of NJ c. Bateman, the party inter
ested it is ordered that alternative writ Of re-
view issue returnable on Friday January 30, 1880,
at IL o'clock A NJ before Department No. l. or as
soon Their after counsel can be heard, and directed
said superior Court aud to said Judge thereof,
successor of the Twenty third Judicial District,
why writ of review should not issue in that
tain action entitled Savings and Loan Society NJ
c. Batenlan CT al, No. SAG, IN the late District
Court of the Twenty-third Judicial District, and
that a copy of the order be served the attorney
Tor saiu savings ana Loan society ana SAID hon.
William F. Daingerield within three days from date.
DEPARTMENT NO. 2.
MONDAY, January 18th.
6900-Bandy w. Ransome-Opinion fled
TUESDAY, january GOTH
10,427-People VS.. All Chung-on motion of
Raymond for appellant, cause continued for thirty
days.
lO,43S-People vs. Morne-on motion of Attor-
ney General for the people, cause continued until
the Sacramento session.
10 361-Ex parte Fraser on babeas corpus Sharp
STEIN j.. being disqualified, did not sit in this case)
Argued by Dwinee, and pending the argument
the Court took
DEPARTMENT NO. l.
55S2-Durl<ee vs. Central Pacific Railroad Com.
pany-Argument concluded by Haynes for respoad-
mt and bergin for appellant and cause submitted.