Sacramento daily record-union. [volume] (Sacramento [Calif.]) 1875-1891, 1880-01-23
THE DAILY RECORD-UNI0N.
vuroAY ..........J JANUARY s3. 1850.
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE



e,sntlenan's motives in introducing this bill, but l
have a do,b: he intended to anticipate the mem
nor. Of the WorkineTnens party. why, SIT, ne
boasted that he did not intend TO OBEY tne WISHES
AZ his constituents. We were elected upon pat,
forr, which holds responsible TO the people TOT All
,,r arts But "Gnd moves in q mysterious way
His wonders to perform" We OF the W0rlilngmen
marty intend t. keep our pledges TO the peopie;
They have kept them. Talk about masing p9', Ni
-anital Who il making political capital: In the
,,Ino nj ustice appeal 20 tine Republicans on TINS
Tor 70 d, Us Justice and allow the members OF our
marty to introduce this bill
Mr. AxTHOSY-Mr Speaker, my mlnd IS made up
A --ota agail.st the motion TO recoInmlt Inc TWO
biils are alike except in one particular The one oy
40 Gentleman from San Francisco contains some
things that are in the other bill. ms Ohl starts
nationally with the State treasury, ana tnen soes
through all the counties in the State. ina. VIII
tal;e my friends in from San Francisco, ana ~
-ludes :he man who gives $3.50, 0oO ponds as
well Is the who gets S. a day Tor MS work- 1
cav We should be rational men. We are not mere
- litter away the valuable time that the state mas
al ,tttd t. us. / am not here to make a
political record in particular. We are mere
representing the principles upon whleh we
we're elected. Here is plain. common sense ON.
That bill allows any member on TINS moor, II nc
feels oppressed under any loai OF money that ne
MAJ have, that he has drawn from the State Treas
urv for mileage, TO go TO the TIRE sry Oh Ie ota'e
and say, - Here Is 50 much money nave no 10 use
for it. and want it to 70 10 this or that fund IL
nothing is said it goes to the school fund.- when Is
the test fund for the eou.itry. That is all night
must vote for it, against my own party, even II
they vote solid. ..
Mr. vouSG-I do not like this way OF recommit-
ting bills with instructions believe lis danger,
Gus work Such amendments are hastily drawn ana
there will be many inconsistencies when our WORK
il completed Now both these bills contain some
ching which is good. The principles involved are
God In order to reach the end, | move that We
discharge the order for third reading. and that
both bills be reoommtted to the Judiciary Commit
tee. -.
Mr.. HARpY-This bill under consideration Is per
fectly sweeping and coveis all the ground Now,
! have listened for time 10 this debate,
and the question seems 10 resolve itself into
this It is question us to whose thunder
g stolen We, as legislators, are not here t. con-
sl1er the motives of gentleman who introduces
bill The bills arr equally meTitonous, perhaps.
Tae bill under consideration covers the ground IL Is
the first bill before the House for action look at
the merit of the bill and not st the character oil me
mover If it be good BILL we, as Legislators vii
do our duty and vote for the bill, irrespective OF
party.
Mr. YORK moved to adjourn. Lost.
On motion of Mr. ADAMS, the previous question
was ordered.
The motion to recomnit was lost by vote OF ~
to 3d. The bill then passed-ayes u, noes T.
On motion OF Mr.. Ti.BAYsoN. at O'Clock, the As
sembly adjourned.