, 1880-04-30


tf1Iuixdrof. NJ G., Aprlf 2A-sftstTa or Vpls-
rExuaE-qutet At 7lHc.
CHICAGO HOULEVARDS.
Proceeding by Quo Nvnrrnnro 10 Test
the legality OF tho Transfer Of Mich"
icnn Avcnuc. -...-.-
xts aippticd to tho Park Commissioners OF tho
Wpst side that body antI the sister Doarta OF tho
Hnr,b and South Sides have anxlously ooiisttl"
'erc,} tho question Of INV tho matter cnN be
brought Into tho Courts 40 that with as little de-
lar "A pots[b!o final opinion chi be llGtl As to
The mowers OF tho Iloart!s In regallnting st,ctt
streets "a they may acquire for tho purpose OF
converting thcnl Into connecting links hctwcan
the three p,rk systems of tho city. Tho n.lea-
don ls ono which cencota,s tho while population,
and every move tn tho cgMi proceedings towards
lnal settlement OF the vcxG1 question Will be-
watched with deep pIbllo Interest.
Tho West Sido pnrk l}nard havo devoted mitch
time to considering thu best why In which TO
make test cnse to hring bcforc tito C.tifts. the
attorney, Uet,. Smith. could 10 ci,gAKod III work.
liz tO,vnrd thu draircl cnt, and yet not htlyo-
eating TINT side Of Gnse w'Eh ,., ws ~ con:i1at
wero fully considered md then abandoned. md
finally tho Board un,iio to tho conclusion TINT
S on asxu sy g bs s m TIC o BE- 10
s?s fsss Ssls9s 81 'sseis ~ ss
decision nt which would OF course bo equally
'Fl Fsr tlIa GI purpose toro was ilie In tho Crlminnl
teass ySstetaay " Wo. n"tu' VII" eno co"7en'
PETITION or QUO wAnItANTo
'thch sets up that tho petitioner was Interested
III property on MIahlKal avenue, ano thnt tllp
spSsng p n se G YSah Sar ss f
cts, tuken possession nf Michigan avenue FROM
tne south i!ne of jackson htreft to tsu soilthtno
%ehay asaaae e aaana hs
PURPOSE ot converting these strruts Into Il b11i-
lesatl md were noE,tru!l!ilE tho nsp OF It. which,
ca'sse tloy. aro public atroota. lio therotore
asks them tg ah0W c4tlso wis thoy SHOULD uu 80.
The Paek CMnn,lssfnners, represented by thotr
Tas iooSink after tho intorGsts ot ths property:
holders on West M washington strost, tho lr'poSed
seri savo rlso to ts.e question ii spnte po",i-
ed II reply to The petition thnt they colllp,ao
tho Pnrk loard OF THO Sni!l sldo:, thAt III tsoi!
aaa lsll tao jenuraI tHfk aGt. Wcro passou
anl loeatcd and that In HIN tho Legislature
patea M anaondat.ry aot wioh gvo !nt9 th4lr
purpose nt c9inenttns thnir .Parks With th1 cGn-
, , ,!o,.,a paa,s ~ u hae tut thoy nanea nteh
& ~ taS 1o, ssr1ct taey wMtGd i"r
per q property.hoGelA Whoso lots ft"ntGd On
s hna seo n ctsed aa fs III H. cG. n
W. ~ tHG E's'-
f'' to- q Mish!san syenne , to tho rark o% for
p.. po4.Ssh!u, IT, ntt'i LINZ ~ cnIhpinnae Wnn taesn
VEN t1"rsin,n nn,t MY ,t nv,,r W",sa nv,"," ~ @
inoonnectlon with otilcr nark nr,injs.
70 THAT plaA uns, sM1rn pxuunnrp,
oSax. ~ aieC!ai s". eateGs or aonrFor, among
saTt WIN % 1ta s uea eraaer ,ng
ae anse sSd I 10 not tn1t falow n tho N st IT,
!q ey II ~ St q Soi that te t
r'ma ,t tatee. !uurtns nL tuo tnplhuefS VI tue
eHHas! Tho n9 I,u not VINO LOT the oraiilahoe;
ecntapns hs MgnSo " M Is Gonnena4tioh of tho mater
swye when tas thoy Sn il tho oe c,!a ~
"YpsiI ~ I,a sro,,o.+ o, s,x,.. n...o, .,... a.,
III she u aI fy 81 II ss
la, ,aKe contrnl OF tho strHeI frn tho city hlid ~
p"t \ IN tho i hands q my Other aniola e.r-
isnse % d to divert It irnm, its ori9inai char.
usono %a street: t!at th9 park commissioners
cbuq,ss. Sbs1a % q MAXI i = boulevard mud to wy whnt
soeasluao ses any class Ut vchclcs rs ihoy might
's'peopeF'
ANOTHER rIHT HE MADE
granting the powes Ia TN % p"rt III coms"3ss1nnur,
toMntsol the street, tho city rvtuiloi th0 rxht
tecontro. ito waisr ani sSwosssRc ia tie strset,
e y rnapuE spp % or = e 9 ohpp i Up
esax Wi tnte''dod % sat }no ; contr It'll et viii" tso
us exclusive control tho ura,li,ance lid n0t .i.v.
anu therefore It was invalid.
VII. noSylr,p,
I'D III n1,, :" sao nrst prs'Gosl1oii. claimed that It
tended e nnr t H. NV H. .rf " A r IT,
hxway sS ~ otSes S sisf pSrposo: @ that
Ssd " GsoellofHLloh hAs!Hy ghnrFon pr strtnA
tcon!d pnhift, a,sx ~ @ ..t,rt.m ni,ht frs,,,