, 1880-10-28
"PULLED."
Kenward Philip, Chief Of the
Democratic Forging
Service, Run In.
He Hopes to Escape by Hav-
ing Written Gaifuld"
for "GarReld."
Unanimous and Unqualified
Testimony Of Veteran
Experts. :
The Prisoner Held in $4,000 Bail
until This Morning at Il
O'clock,
Darnum, Meantime, Uttcring
tho Forgerics with Asinine
Assi'!nity.
A Trainfu1 Flying to the Pa
cific Western Wires
sagging Heavy with
His Lies.
The New York "Sun" Calls
Barnum Fool, and soaks
Its Head in Shame.
Complete Aspect of tho Glorious
Republican Campaign Now
Closing.
Garfield at Mentor - Grant at
Rochester-NeaI Dow in
Maine.
The Official Reports Of tic Recent
| Vote Cast In Ohio and
Indiana.
Views Of tho Parsee Merchant" on
| the Need Of Tariff Re-
form.
| NAILED TO THE, CROSS.
The Official Reports Of tho Recent
Vote Cast III Ohio and
Indiana.
Views Of tho Parsee Merchant On
the Need Of Tariff Re-
form.
NAILED TO THE, CROSS.

Special u4ya&eh to The Chtehsa Tribune.
NEW YonK, Oct 21.-Tlle lnnn who wrote
the bogus Garfield letter.. ,senw ward PlIilp,
was arrested to.tlny and urrntglcl for mail
ctous libel. Tl,at this event would occur
was clcnrly set forth in THE TRIBUNE Of
Monday and Tuesday last. III advance Of my
other publication III the United States.
Your dispatches, published Monday aud
Tuesday, OIL tho Clllnese letter forgery, were
based OIL the reports Ut experts WHO, OIL coin.
pairing the manuscript Of kenward PHILIP,
Onf, ct tho editors Of the Truth, reported to
John I. Davenport that Philip was tho
forgcr. On Sunday Afternoon four experts,
nat knowing Philips namo and neither one
knowing that the others were at work ut It,
but all having before them Philips ina,,-
uscript, reported unanimously that thu
author of certain editorial article published
In Truth and headed,
GAnFlEtn's DEATIl-wARRAST,"
was tho forKcr Of tile Chinese letter: They
l,.l.I before them the editorial III different
si.ects,-that Is, eacl. cxpert had portions Of
tho copy Ut tint ellitarul. Tiny detected not
only'n similarity between this manuscript
and Gartielt's, but they detected also Gar-
fields lnlne III four places 50 closely similar
| to tho llano In tho alleged Garfield letter
| TINT tllc1o could bc no doubt ttut
tho a,ltilur Of the editorial was tho writer Of
| the letter. Three OF them caEle to tho COLI
ctus!un TINT there was nO forgery, aid tllut
the author OF tho famous latter could not b9
l,cld under n',y known law, for tho reason
tint the signature to tho C|,l'ese letter IL
Sor "0AKrlEl.D," hut "GAlrutla"
It's claimed by experts employed by Truth
| thatetle identity Of Garfield ts 40 frinly in-
pressed Oh tic letter that there can bo
no doubt ot Its nllthuntfcltv. But tho
Testimony Ut Ames. who Is quoted
by Raucl as tho best expert III tho
country, Is tint tho letter Is forgery, at,d
that the dottlng OF tho ar" Instead OF the
Vi" Is ~ i,anifestly tho work OF a mnn to
| suyc himself that ho would be willing, o.,
tllnt fnct aiunc, II t.e Ind none othor to fastcn
tho guilt m tho mai. WHO wrote tile editorial
on which plilIp was arrested t}.tlay. III the
fesscs ho wrote, the name OF Garfield Is
used, a1ld
TIL: DOT 1s OYER TIE "R"
md. besides that, the wllolo llane Is such 4
close imitation of tho signature tn tho Cllltesa
letter that Mr. A1neS mAdo tic rclnArk, aud
was substantinted BY Mr.. Payne, another ex-
pert also at work Oil tho casu, TINT tho writer
Of TINT wurtl could bu Convicted ut tho for
CORY OIL that word alonc. .rIlNy fund also a1l
tho characters OF the Garfield lettcrln l'hllp's
handwriting, antl, comparing then arrived
ut the unanimous conclusion tllat Philip was
tho author of tho letter. At about tilIs time
TROUBLE ANosE
as to tho charge that ahoul be made against
| Philip John /. Davenport ut frat Insisted
oil forgery, but this trouble with tho Keput.
llcan party III Now York IL tint 1t Is cursed
witt, lawyers. The point was laadu by tlle
leRtl advisers tllat tho forger could mt be
held for forgery. They cluinleA that, while
tho moral evidences Of the nlan's guilt waa
complete, under the circumstances no could
not be held, md tint, If at,y action was takel
against him for the forgery, tha prosecution
would fall.
THOMAS 4. I.0SEItaAN,
tha detective who worked up the case and
furnished tho eyftfancr, c0nteNdetl that the
only satety III the premises lay In tho estab
ltshment OF the fUrgury, Wlul that chargu 01
lesser nature falletl tn accomplish thu Oh
jcct. fle admitted ti,at PHILIP might bo pun
lshod for libel, but claimed ttla
such action would be tho ruiz
OF tho party, because 1t wa:
q quasl-confessLon TINT tle party 'coutd no
dlspruye tho authenticity of the letter. Ill
WIS nut by the argument that It Was tmpos
siblu to carry tie guilt holne to Philip. II
this he responded TINT, II the exports fcp0r
was correct, it f.stulleh thu guilt ut the let
ter as closuly as 1t fastened tho authorship
, Of tho llhelous editorial.
TO-uAf
phllu stas ARRESTED fur lMAltctauR lllAl. TIL