National Republican., 1880-11-10
District Courts.

ClRcuIr COURT. DIVISION No. l--TusriCE Mac.
AITHuR.-Shcpherd Co vs. Davis; rule on DAVIS
defendant discharged, bankrupt smith. by next
friend vs. Douglass; Judgment for plNintiil, one
cent damages ana 9oss r".o@S dGIT" rnon ooS
TOtten, RGiSsuer VS., Shepherd; demurrer suG-
tanned. Ross vs., Marlim Judgment confessed for
amount Of claim. Walker vs. Higgins; Judgment
Of condemnation. Lunsburgh vs. BcveridgC judg-
mcnt confessed for SiG5, Washington vs. Clark
rule on plaintiff to employ new counsel -, Lnckelt
Carty; one cent damages. Clements IS Adnmsi
plaintiff called, Guisla VS.. Brown; plainn called.
lerluuh vs., corporation Of Wnshingtun on cuen-
dGr. United States vs. English ct al; dciendant
called, LelghIer VS.. Hubbard ct ali Jury dis
GlFCrTr Coupr Division No. 2-JusucG HAG.
EER.-Rufys, Brown; on hearing
EQUITY CoURI-JUsIICE CoN.-lircrcton VS.. Brcro-
Ton; decree to be prepared, Gordon VS. Brady;
bill dismissed. Hilton We, Hilton; or calendar
Norton vs. Goweus; reference TO auditor with ie-
strictions. Mcintosh W. CSNcl continued by con
before Examiner William \, snyder. Herbert vs.
Fround new trustee appointed. SGmhcuev vs.
SChueidoG leave 10 Withdraw tax bill granted
Walter VS., Bcrberich guardian al liiem appointed
Wheatcy vs.. leWs; testimony ordered taken be-
fore william 7, snyder; Bradford vs. Bredy;
motion for Injunction aud receiver set for NOvcul-
Der 10. Sherwood VS., Haley ct Gl.; pro cuuiCssO
aganStJ. Dawson and reference 10 the auditor.
Shoemaker vs., Shoemaker auditors report ON trus-
tees account confirmed. McGraw VS.. McGrnw;
sale urdcrd and trustees appointed. Tuohy w.
HOltNnan; on hearing. ,
CRlMINAL COURT - JUSTICE JAMES,-N illiHm
Pope, murder OF j. t. Butler ON trial.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TODAY.
C:.culT COURT Division No. l-JusflcE MAC
An1IluR.-No. i1S, Johnson vs.. Fauucc, l9l,
Humphrey vs. Baltimore & Potun.Ge railroad COM
pluy; l9g. Citizens National bank VS.. NOuus, 2gl,
Joseph aud j. T.. Lihbey W, ShlpMnn ct al; 203,
Hoover vs.. Davis; g0j, lNrquhHr ". Johnson; 2Oi,
Duyall trustee, vs.. lbbey ct all -OD, Roach vs..
Hilton; 2ll United States vs., Brown et al; 2la,
United States vs. Sweet et all 2l5, Nell vs., lCurich,
2l7, simmons ys lluluhms 2l0, bona. president
etc ". Rrumhall Ct al ~, Disulc. Of Columbia
VS., Evans Ct all 223, District OF Columbia W.
Evans,
CmCulT COURT DYlsloS NO. 2.-JusrlcE No
NEn.-Appea calendar No. 100, Cmugy Y Co,
vs. Dunn Regular calendar: No, $50, Mulings'
ford vs. Bcnurtt l3S Oheyulllc vs. Douglass; ~
M1sher vs., Maryman gSl, Bnrbrdgc ye, Carpen-
| ter 2Sl Wilson rs. Terry ct Nli go, Cooley vs..
! Webster & Blo,heT .5 Wood vs.. Williams $50,
NlutuskU. Craig 4 Co. vs., GGri0Ddi SO2 Willie W.
Bacon, sos, Norris Co. VS., luisy, 80, WILKINSON
vs. Thomas; $40, Appcm0n VS., Clarke; oi., Daniel
| vs. Piedmont S Arlington Life Insurance company
| 3lS Chapman VI, thurel; 520, Bond executor, Vs.
! Fowler
fQulN CouBT-JuUIcE CoN.-No. II, Tuohy
| vs.. lloltlmRu; G6, Brown VS., Warner ~ Murray
Ys. Fletcher %, Foster vs.. Foster vs., Wright vs..
/ WarneE 4O MeumGu vs. parrotE ii, M,tanley
| vs. knights of ST. Patrick; 42, Rogoh vs. kc5Nn
| &C. Douglass vs., Lucas; Is, brown w. bu!icE 4v,
| Dipplo IS. Kccsc, 20, RubinsonW, shoomakeT n,
| Mitchell vs.. wilson, o. Ashton w. WALL Oj, kll'
| boum w. lnliu. .,
CMNrSAL CorRr-Jugacs JAMES, William Pope
| mUrdeE