The Cincinnati daily star. [volume] ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) 1875-1880, 1880-01-27

CTATE OF OHIO. HAMILTON COUNTY,
y Common Pleas COurt.--No. 609N --Henriot1A
Kr,letz. Plaintiff, against James I. Cabil, Defend
ant.-The defendant, James T. Cahll, q resident
Of Free viii, County of Osborne, and state q
Kansas the Inst known residence Of said defend
ant, is hereby notified that the plaintiff, Hen
rie IA Kruetz. did. ON the 18th day Of DecembeE
4. D. 1879, file her petition with the Clerk Of tho
Ohio, against James 7. Canill. setting forth that
ON the ID day of May, A. D. 1877, he made ana
delivered unit this plaintiff his certain n0tes, ono
for the sum Of eight hundred dollars, and Two
six and twelve month after date. the same heing
secured By mortgage on the following real enatA
tn-wit:
Being Lot No. s, and described az follows: b.
al thirty acre tract Of james Cahill. four HUNDRED
and eight f0rty-twO one hundredths (4OS 42loV
feet east of the west line of section six; thence
north e 00 east, six hundred and sixty-twO hum
dredtbs feet to lhe center OF Warsaw Pike; thence
along the center of said pike. south SO ~ east
ninety seven eighty onehundredths feet theacs
north SO 4V west n'nety-seven fifty One-hun-
dredths feet to the place OF beginning, containing
one and f0rty.eight one hundredths Il %&1eQD
acres
Also Lot No g. and described ss follows to-wit
Beginning ut . point In the south line Of the
original 80 acre tract Of James Cahill, distant two
hundred and nifty 6lOO (25O 5-l0O) feet west Of IN
old aoue marking intersection Of said south lipe,
with The west line of said Cahill 10 acre EacE
thence north . deg. east six hundred and MY
eight t65S) feet to the center OF the Warsaw Pkg
thence along the center Of said pike, north Sc deg
"A min. west sxty-nine S-loo (69 2S.1Og iees,
100 1890 1890 feet thence north 81 deg ~ mia
west sixtynine 1890 l69 1900 feet to the place
OF begiMing containing one 2l00 Il 3l00) AGRA
NO. pon sSe ssuS ss ns oor o
nal B9acTe tract Of James Cahill one hundred
and forty -four and 44-lC0 feet west Of 60no
making the intersection Of said south line with tho
Yves, ne Of said Cahill's ls-ncre tract moth deg,
east six hundred and twenty-sx 78l00 (626 78l00)
feet to the center Of the Warsaw PiheI
thence along the center Of said pike nOrth
a dey. 30 min. west one hundred aud uirty-nine
u o. feet: thence south IL deg. west six hun,lred
the thirty acre tract aiorenn nti0ned; thence
Snuth 81 Dig. 40 min. eSst one hundred AMI
ihirty.nve 6ll00 Gs5 6l-l0e) feet to the place Of
beginning containing two acres. and b lug Z
tceased, IN Delhi Township. Hamilton County,
OHIO. as eubdiv ded BY the Commissioners In tho
case Of Mary Cah II against So ah Labor 1t al,
No. 4o.29, Hamilton County Common Pleas
The prayer in plaintiffs petition Is that shehavs
q Judgment for the sum OF eight hundred dollars
with tAterc,t at the iate of eight per cent from
the ID day Of MMy. A. D., 1873. ais for the sum ol
forty dollar, with interest from tho 2i day Of
May, A: D.. 1874 end that upon the failure y pay
aid Judgment wit hin the time fxed BY the Conf,
for the payment Of ~ sums, that said deser, bed
premises be appraised. advertised and sid that th1
proceeds Of said sale be y piled to the payment
VI said sums, 50 40 aforesaid. and that unkss The
said defendant answer Or demuy tn said petition
within six consecutive weeks after the first a1ver.
iisement herein. judgment will be taken for said
sum N w Aforesaid. decree will b. rendered 20.
e0rdingly. and for sach other and further relief -
in equity she may be entitled thereto.
HENRIETTA KRUETZ PrG
A. J. JEssUP, her Attorney, 8. W. corner Cnut
and Walnut streets. Rooms Nos and 2 Cincln.
natl, Ohio ja186tTu