Catoctin clarion. [volume] (Mechanicstown, Md.) 1871-1940, 1880-03-25
TER E,AEl%t. TEE ssoEG
E5ASiL ASsi.

Many times women call upon their fam
with palpitulion, another with trouble of
the breast, another with pnin here and
there, and in ;his way they all present
alike to thcmsclyc. and their easy gong
ana nG;Nertnt doctors, separate and dis
tinct diseases, for which he pIcSClibcs his
pills and po'ions, assuming them to be
such, whcn in reality, they are all sylnp
tons caused by some uterine disog.Icr and
while they are thus only able perhaps to
the cause, and encourage their practice
until large bills are made, Wien the suffer
ing patients are no better in the end, hut
probably worse for the delay, treatment,
and other complications made, and which
proper medicine directed to the cause
would have entirely removed, thereby HI.
stiluting health and comfort instead of
prolonged misery.
SHADE, Athens Co Ohio.
DIR. Il. V. PIERCE, Buffalo, \. Y;
Your Fayori,c Prescription IS working
almost like a miracle on me-. am better
already than Lave been for over two
years. lORlNDA T.. 81. CLAIR.
YORKNILLE, Toronto, Ont. Mar Is, 70
r. V. PIERCE, NJ d.;
Dear Sir write you about most g
m0rhahIc cure OF a ndy friend Of mine Mrs
Ra,hcrn, Since her marriage thirteen
year. ago. She has suffered greatly from
uterine disease viii ii caused slcriily.-
She tried the most eminent physicians Of
tins part Of the country, who told her she
would have to undergo an operation with
the knife, Being afraid Of this. she WAS in.
duccd bv reading your Medical Adviser to
take YOUR Fayortc Prescription and Pei
lets. She used three bottles as result she
entirely recovered her health and is the
happy mother Of a ncsiihy babe.
Very truly yours,
MRS. JOHN MyELROY.
The HORSEPOWER CAsE.-lwo motions
for nc trial Of the MunShowcr murder
case was argued at Frederick on Monday
before judges Lynch and Bowie by Cart
James McShclry for the accused and VIM.
p Mnulsby, Jr, and States Atloruew Mot.
ter for the prosecution. The first motion
WAS based upon the alleged irregularities
attending the deIivcranCc Of the verdict at
the conclusion Of tie late trial, Mr. Nc
power after once delivering one verdict, to
withdraw it and substitute another A
second point in support Of the motion was
that one Of the Jurors who was drawn as a
tales man under the name of Joseph II
Brown, vas summoned and returned by
the Sheriff rs Jos. b. Brown, and that not
withstSnding an objection raised bv ccun
sci, lie WIS sworn and cnpanelcd as ~
Juror. This fact it was contcndcd, rem.
dercd him incompetent and therefore the
verdict was made by eleven instead of
twelve jurors as required by the constitl-
ton of the State. The argument on the
motion for a new trial was on the ground,
that the Court erred IN instrucling the Jury
that one of the two verditts only could be
rendered, namely, guilty of murder in the
first degree, or not guilty" 1t was con
tended that the jury ar the judges Of law
and facts in criminal cases, and had the
right to render verdict under any of The
counts alleged to be comprchendcd within
the crime Of murder The instruction
therefore was erroneous and void, because
of its tendency to msead the jury The
several questions were ably argued by
counsel pro. and con, and many authori.
ties were adducId by both sides The
iud-m,ut Of tic coult wa held Sub rDyin.