The Dallas daily herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1887, 1880-03-20
HEIR NOTHING INDUSTRY.
Domcsllc Consumption ana Eorcign
deportation,


During the past ipw years the bper bollllng
Industry hs llnp avery snhll beginning, be-
come unu ~ llu chief industries uI our great
cily, 'lnrfenrr number ofeAlouslYe concerns
engaged IN this business, but tho ono great
Leading irm ~ whom tho Trade World
deslrp ~ especially cnll attention This week,
h TINT Of q, conrad ~ o., 400 to AZ North
Sixth street, This firm hHs been Gngaged
Nh wholesale lquOr deAlrs md importers Of
Wiuur In H. Louis Tor seventeen YEAR,, aud
during lho pnrl lhpe years extensively on
gagru IN bllllug of IN unGqualed quality OF
beer, which they had ludcou'ly protected
under the expressive nHme0t
HupwElsRR HEIR,
Increasing their sales from $4,000 during
tho first year 10 100000 during the last,
This beeris declared by our best physicians
10 BIO beautiful aud not Intoxicating Their
trade IN this celebrated Hudweisor Ia gener-
ally throughout this country, m we'll ~ on tho
fRelno ~ Alla llic ocean, on tho gulf ~
on the Northern lHkcs, while largo quantities
roach Mexico, Central America, West Indies,
ana largo expectations 10 many localities In
Europe, ~, Louis owes 70 the energy, de-
termination md great judgment of q, Conrad
~ Go, great praise for the splendid success and
unrlyallod reputation Of this Budwcisor
beer demonstrating our ability 10 manulao-
turc the best mild drink In the world. But
II Is not to DO concluded that G. Conrad 4
Go. have reached their present prominent
rank as supplers of such celebrated beer
without great labor, yeXalIon and expense.
They have met many great difficulties, but
by perseverance, they have finally overcome
every obstacle, and now hayo iair sailing, II
might be Of service 10 our rGaddrs TO mon
ton the litigation between this firm and the
Uhrig Brewing company, involving the
charge against the Uhrig company that they
were irNudulontlN and In violation of The
rights of Conrad ~ 90, and the public, sell
ing an Inferior article Of beer under the name
Of Budweiser mud with tables, bottles etc,
calculated to deceive the public Conrad Il
Co. sued the Uhig company for $4,000
damages,
The result, after thorough examination
of the quality of the two beers, and the diff
iGrenl bottles, labels, etc, was, that the court
gave judgment for large damages TO Conrad
n Co., and forever restrained the Uhrig Brew
ing company from using the namo Of Bud
weiser IN connection with beer of any kind.
This decision has lately been affirmed by tho
Court of Appeals, and to-day clothes Con-
rad u Co. with the solo right and exclusive
privilege Of using the name Budweiscr. This
Is important to tho trade, and will relieve the
whole matter of the doubt and uncertainty
surrounding the question before tho action Of
the court.
A Wis TO the immense concern, ifluly des-
cribed would require full page of this pa
per, There We found the most extensive eel
lars used for this purpose in st. Louis, all
full of different kinds Of wines, liquors,
etc, SO largely dealt in by this firm. Their
bottling rooms are the most extensive in the
city; theirwholesale and retail departments
are in very detail and elaboration perfect.
We conclude by extending TO Mr. Conrad
our congratulations upon his full and COM
plcte success in giving to St. Louis the proud
credit of supplying to the world the best art
iclo Of beer known in Europe or America,
and no is entitled to the thanks of every deal
err in wines, liquors or beer for the decided
settlement of the disputed rights touching
the trademark, "Budweiser." Witha iudg,
ment of the courts and general popular and
public judgment in his favor the future pre-
sents the brightest prospects for rapid and
steady increase in his present enormous bust
ness. Mr., G. is a gentleman OF pleasing man
nors, full of energy and intelligence, with
reputation for integrity and reliability among
the best citizens Of this and other cities.
Branch houscin Dallas, SOC Main streot
, j. SMoNs, Agent.
Marchl0-3t