National Republican., 1880-10-21
District Courts.


SUPREME CoUpT or ruE Disrmcr-C -CHfEF-Jus-
| TfCE CARTTEH AND JUsTICs WYIE.-McNianuI
VS. Staudish Chilos vs. Porter, Wiider vs.. stand
ish continued: fund I'm hnuds Of tecrctnry Of state
who IL Ia said. has decided to distribute the Hme
Adt VS.. Browning: opinion by the Chleliu.tCe dis
changing mud from he operation Of the attach
mCut, and affirming the decree below. Van RisWick
vs.. spaldng; plaintiTgiycu leave 10 withdraw rep
ncatiOn aud tn make W. W. Rpplcy y arty de-
| iendont Cahlll VS.. Witmor Judgment below
affirmed.
CmCuu Court DIVISION No 2--JusTicE ITAGNER.-
| T. a. Keyser W.. T.. II. Rowe. judgment below for
| possession and costs affirmed. Wngganan vs..
Courtney: settled Berger vs. Alexander verdict
| inr p.0in,ln for S21Oj and costs. Harrison w.
| Thompson; dismi2od Lyon vs.. Hall; dismissed.
| Richards vs.. Kilmon; on trial.
| EQuUY COURT-JusrIca CoX,-Coburn VS.. Hen
| dcsou sale finally ratified aud caus6 referred to
| the auditor Rupcy VS.. Brown ct a.; proCOuiesso
against certain defendants granted. CIHgeu VS..
| brooke; distribution authorized. Brown VS.. Dyer
claims ordered vlid out Of funds In the hands OF
| John 7 Given. McCOulcy vs.. Adams et AL rent
| ordered paid defendants restrained ana required
i % inicrplead Harris vs.. Sweet pro confcssO made
| dual and decree fer $500 with interest Hampton
VS. Hampton; absent defendant ordered to ap-
pear Og!C vs. Oglc; pro cOnicssO granted and tes-
| iimony ordered taken Thelocke vs.. Thiclccke:
| icovc granted TO amend bill. lngeHoI vs.. James;
| trustee directed to pay certain notes. Richie W.
| WulUOiG execution suspended. Slraus VS.. Friend
| Ch; on hearing,
| CRIMINAL COURT-JuSTfcE JAMEs.-somuel N.
| Adnn', assault on Albert q. Thomas; Jury out.
| Robert Robinson, assault on Policeman Hinelne;
| on trial.
ASSIGNMENTS ron TO-DAY.
| SUPREME Court or THE DISTRICT -CHGEF-JUsTIcR
| CARTIER NDJUsTICE WYLIE--No. 81, Armstrong
| vs.. Williams GS. Draper vs.. Alexander 10. Ken
nGdy vs. Kelly; a. Hurdle VS. Collins; az, Hiil VS..
| National Fair associations; 73. United Stntes vs..
Vessels; ~. Clark vs.. Strong ~ Adamantinc Brick
company VS.. Woodruff 49, Ramsay VS.. Daniels 10,
| McB'air vs. McDlair
CIRCUIT COURT. DIVISION No. 2--JUsrIcE HAG-
| NEu.-Appcal docket: No. 30. johnson VS.. Dis
trct OF Columbia; 3s, Knight vs.. Brooks; ~. john
son & Co. VS.. Vale; A. FOurnor vs.. Cake &C. Smith.
by next friend, vs.. Wade IS, Hoover VS.. Rest; 20.
| lcnn uSe. oiL, VS.. Saunders; %, Davis vs.. May;
52lS Smith VS.. Pepper; 81, Richl VS.. Mormgnn; 5S.
| Edmonston VS. Hess; 60 Schultz vs. Jordan; G2,
Murray VS.. Mountency; g., Kuchlng vs. Phelps;
| GO. Tottle X Co. VS. Schlcsingcr; CS. Norfeet Co.,
use. etc, VS. Cabell; TO- Ressner & Jenks use, etc.
vs. Smith; ~, Lovi VS.. Ulcrmehle a. JOY VS.. Mary
man; 7G Bnumgarten vs.. Western Union telegraph
company; rs, DAVIS VS.. Hill, 50, Coleman vs. Balt-
more Il Ohio railroad company.
EQUITY CoURT-JusTfCE CoX.--No. A. Strauss vs..
Fricndlich 20 Cahill vs.. Cahil ?, Lewis VS..
Kennedy; 81, Vance vs. Little; l. Peugh vs. Davis
40. Beavans vs.. Hughes 80, kee VS.. Nilkinson;
IS. Brereton VS.. BreretOn; ~, Nelson VS., Mayne;
10, Leonard VS.. Leonard 1s, Burcho VS.. Wallach
| 10, Wallach vs.. Burche
| CRIMINAL COuRT-JusrICE JAMEs.-Mnrtin BEN
nett, personal violence on policeman: Patrick Bab-
| bington, same: John ToOmcy. same; Emil Homil.
snmc GeOrgcW Walters same.