Delaware state journal. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1870-1883, 1880-12-02


last week. and paid II last week we never had
aIny'hng 70 40 WIN tns TIM TX Oh MI Eases , s-
erty down in ths Owls nest. il never was among
our assets"
No cross-exim'nation'
DID NOT HEAR IT.
Pafis i. Carlisle, recaied,Mas ~ mat inter
n"cstian nnt there nv Mr. Mir NJ Snow of '"'"
Uro-4-examintd-i sat in font of Messr+. Muir
and Bright did not hear any mention OF any
pau5b ho eonnv d NY and %I'G her mSri ns
heard nothing about not - they were not men
TONED.
SAYS so EMrnATicALLr.
DR.: Joseph II. Tantum, recaed-Was present
M us nSyu uod 'g "G ih ,o
80 cmlhatcally am vice president Of tile com.
pany; never heard of this Murdcrki hundred
hor, gago knew no,n,s OF u ,i,'h ,.,d nsmfu
thing 10 do with it, but III nix / heard Myers
speak OF il once; We have paid between 81 900
' s,aI " cs i1 t ,1'es n sr noo H,oT ,al r
to invite him oticialIy TO examine INTO the con-
diton If our company.
no efosT-eAHnl"H'ion'
ouiri ahont ts Uipton comfy Iand before made
my first report; spoke TO several persons
connected with me COMPANY about II, aud
VIII" said n in"y were Familiar with IT, and from
that inquiry / fell it was worth what We were put
thu II III for, S5olO; had z, oil l9r It party
wa.s 40 90 eScndsg rnuI, ea p"puIy
TO the Board, because / Thought there might be
more ~ II. IT., .......
on a iSSTF ssUu vn' y hv
i this pr,pertyever since the company came to
wilmington, and have never seen it, nor have
apS vi INV "'n'prs' J." my AnoM'o'H''
CONTINUED TILL rhuHspAf.
Inc prosecutor, res,em mere a. oio' a,u NE Me-
oy, mil Thurs,i,y morning. as he. being one OF
the Pres dental electors, VIII be obliged to 20 to
D3v.r Tomorrow 10 Gu, ms svciorh Vo'e ,
openinr arr Ineup in Inc morning. M d 90 down to
Dover in ,iie astcrnnpn, 10 viii n he replied that,
gu aeconnt o. VIZ Wh,tr, y- inuisposiion, nd
clos,. md II ,y,a ,irir. .5,,ti that h.. shnnId
be present 10 hear the argument On the part of the
defense. ,--., ~, r-,-..
oas, or roii,,aI n c.s ri Thnr.J,v bnt
Viii sit tomorrow for the hcaring Of molions and
the Transaction OF other business.
ERECTION.
r., ,ha ran,r. of the ,es,i,nonv in the
lbel ,ase taken Monday ti,.re we're two
rrors of imnortanne The -st occurs in
,bs ,a,,ort az ina croes .yamirstion of Mr.
Adv / Wilson in which he ia msde tn
sav ths, tba buildings on the NoKa. farm
could probably be- replaced for Sl2.OoO.
uas,,d M ooo
Aoain IN the yano,t of tba examination
NJ NJ Jo,n F.-r;s ba NO rsnr.sant.a as
saying ,.nn to a DIV mr. On aop belived
Tn;na was he 40 n'nr.eay, I'm. ,mplvi,lp
hot ba Ala mt .,;,I thinL on mis- 10 mn.
;,st IN NJ F.rris Ha testified that
so,d him fF.rrisl recori.6 tifst TO
,,aI,a Il erst uortoaga and
Il ,ras in rasronse IN a nnea,,on con.
n,rn ms an al .gsJ s,.arIrtas of The mart
,n,,,a Of Rriabi ,bst Nj F.rris AMID he
n n hard Of il tll Bripht told him of it
Z, % dava ago 'rbe ,enorter oot tbinys
| ,,,.,.,t,,. ,,,i,,..i IL oond'. no;n, tba ,aoti
r,n,,y and ra,,ds NJ II wis onn.ar Ia
a., I'm. tho INV, ,ooa sold rim bv
Ri, ne srst ,no,tsn1,a ana racorled
a,,,,r,,i,,,, Ia n.,..bt,s nro,,iea ab,,d ~
49, o,n,- -, ,r,,,,fs an tbo san,e nronartv
10 M, n A., npori,a NJ Farris does
, 70 ,". = "'o a.,r Tin, nf c,nrsa
"o' "''u' "''S '''4 '''''s - '7
NE oAsILE' Dec. l'-oouft met tn's
morning 'ew minutes "l.er w.
he nWe OF Ltnsuo"n vs., MaA"e'' VINE
dlsepn1uneo ol tue p'eln'h'
lhe case oil teii vs. ofanS'oh was con
IL nsd' g,
Tine case Of andrews vs.. eS-onsfin
Grnbb WAS aeclhed IN iaVoF OF oeteuoaht'
Tor costs.
D'ion vs. WhiIenlan was con'inueu aS
was also 5hmts vs. Pritchett.
Tho colnatl Agreed upon judgment II
Banca VS.. Welis,
T'oSUh vs. A'klhson WIS cohtinueo'
Sugar Manufacturing Company vs.
Schledd was referred to counsel.
Holland sVs. Hoiland's, administrators
was decided IN favor OF plaluufi; amour
TO to decided by counsel
PurcoSt aud Craven vs, Speehf Judg
ment on the usual terina
The first case reached for ttlal wa
johnson VI. Boyle, and jury was drawn
Cox VS.. Grubb was settled by counsel
the defendant paylpR the co7ts.
Thompson vs.. Conner was sclded n
favor OF painah below.
A'rich Vi. Nandegrift and Cats VS.
Cltmahts were continued.
The trial iben commenced in Johnso
VS.. Boyle. ihis was an appeal from
justice OF the peace. II WAS an acton 0
sssumpsit for wotk aud labor doue. Ih
.wouut clain,d is $50 Tor the Tin roohu
supplied.
James keegHu was the first witress-
Ana TIN TOOfeE by Trade know th
p'rties to this SUIT : in tht sptlng OF lef
| | helped Mr. Johuson do the work TO
was eoont the premises WINS the WE