The Redwood gazette. [volume] (Redwood Falls, Minn.) 1873-1940, 1880-01-29

much inconSenience and delAy. The post
lo0ce address Of The Witnessed must be
Rivsn Il al cases. $3.50 The object Of
the law requiring such notice b to give
parties having adverse claims or Alings
or those having knowledge that the clai
mant has not complied with the require
ments Of the Statutes, full notice Of the
time and place, Of presenting proof in
order that opportunity may be given
them to. be heard prior TO the perfection
Of entry" -" ss' # AZ
District Court. -
The publication OF the business trans
acted at the late January term Of the
District Court, Judge Cox presiding, has
, been delayed on account Of the proceed
ings Of the Board Of County Commission
ess taking up more space in our columns
than usual. The Court was in session
three days. In the case Of the State vs..
Matt Offerman, there was : motion made
to quash and get aside the Indictment
which was taken under adyisement BY
the Court. The defendant renewed his
bail in $500. County Atty Wallin having
been retained BY the defendant previous
to his election, John H. Bowers Esq. was
appointed assistant County Attorney to
act in this case. Wallin, Baldwin. Mil
Ter & Morrill, for deft. asa. So.
Geo. N. Hill, indicted for larceny, not
appearing, the Go. Atty was ordered to
prosecute the bond. oaa tfa4
State vs.. Oscar Stevens Larceny, from
the town of Redwood Falls. The action
was dismissed and the judgment of
guilty of tho Court below reversed, on
the ground that the proof before it did
not authorize conviction. The question
as to the organization Of the town Of
Redwood Falls was not raised in the case
and of course not decided. We make
this statement to correct an erroneous
impression which seems to have originat-
ed in connection with the disposition of
this case. Wallin for State. Baldwin.
Miller s Morrill, for defcndant.
Two delinquent tax cases IS, VIM. F.
Davidson and Eliza Meissncr were set
tied without costs and dismissed. Wal
lin for Com'rs. Williams s Davidson for
appearers. ~ seg w :.
Sherman P. Terrell vs. Sam. E. Bailey,
appeal. Argued and taken under advise
ment. ,Wallln for appellant. Baldwin,
Miller s. Morrill, for respondent.
D. B. Whitemore vs.. Board Of county
Com'rs. The facts in this case are as
follows; In the case Of State vs.. Immel.
Sheriff Whitemorc made one trip to
Lamberton to serve lthc.warrant and SUBJ
poena the witnesses. and charged for two
trips or mileages. The question was
whether he could charge for two trips
or milcagcs when the
subpoena was incorporated in the warrant.
The Sheriff III the same case. there being
NO jail in the county. employed guard
night and day for the prisoner. bill for
which was allowed and paid. He after
wards presented a bill Of 81. day for
compensation for himself for having
charge Of the prisoner during the same
period. which was disallowcd by the
board and for these reasons the Sheriff
appealed. In connection with the dis
) cussion 81 this case The doctrine Of cU,I
oxERE was presented to the considers
ton Of the court by j. Wilson Paxton
Esq. who ably argued the case On the
part Of the county. The questions were
taken under advisement Inv the court.