Green-Mountain freeman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1844-1884, 1880-10-20

Mr Howe Of Ludlow moved that rule be amended
by striking out that part which provides for the en-
Mr.. Page Of Rutland opposed the motion OF Mr..
howe lie thought was safer to req lire bills to be
Mr. Fiheld of Montpelier said 1t would require
special law to secure Mr. Pages object There must
IN the secretary Of states Office; but that could not be
,9Mr PAGE said that the first step was to make the
Joint rules what they should be; then they could pass
Mr. Howe Of Ludlow was afraid IT would take twice
engro tsed before the third reading.
Mr. Huckley believed in the present law, directing
od B ar oen sses amended sr S hd
reading. and if those amepdments tackled on TO
%hee bills hsa been ssny er
to strSiEhten the them out ae thonsht the present
method safer than the old that there, had been
Alter further discussion BY Mr. Fletcher, Mr. Howe's
Mr. Batte moved to strike out the rule creating the
com on the house o correction; and add to the com
ton So as to make @ one com for both nsttGtSns
Mr. Hinckley favored the motion of the gentleman
would save expense to the state
Mr.. Howe tacetiously proposed further amend
meht, SO as to unite three cOns-the com. reform
school, house of correction and game and fisheries.
y want to visit Lake Champlau to look lfIer the dsh
AMI ii would save one trip TO Essex junction. Laugh
Nj; Martin Of Londonderry, (Mr. Dart Of weathers-
without any change The two CONS. were very i'm.
not only be good legislators. but should have ample
time to perform their duties understandinKly. The
their nature The house of correction com, might
fore them this would need considerable tas in
order to arrive at correct decision The com on the
reform school would have the whole question OF the
treatment of young offenders before them There
was already difference OF opinion between the
urihg vernon and the management which onght to
be looked INTO If the supervision of these two instiu
mem9srs q Pe away ioPsef than they oaEht to DO
VI. Howe or Ludlow Withdrew his amendment. and
VI ment
Mr. Mott of AlburSh moved that sec IL of the Joint
rules, which that no bill which passes House
on the last day of session shall be sent to the other
Tor concurrence, be stricken out.
Messrs. Martin and Hinckley opposed this amend
ment their reasons being the same They called the
which were 80 we'll known that they needed no illus
traton. The amendment was then lost.
M Howe Of Ludlow proposed to further amend sec,
and insert provision that all bills after their final
passage shall be signed by the presiding officials OF
both houses
Mr. Page moved to substitute for Mr. Howe's amend.
meut s. of the rules of last session: agreed to- and
the JOINT rules we're adopted with proposals of
amendment.
Bills, etc. introduced and referred-From the SEN
ate, g. an act authorizing the village st. Johns
bury to refund their bouds and to issue bonds
By Mr.. Chase of Jay, providing that persons i'm
prlsOned on account of offence of which hey snail
ing the accusation reasonable compensation; to com
on the Judiciary.
BY Mr.. DOud of New Haven, to Iegslize and incor-
ate the congregational society Of New Haven; to gen
BY Mr. Abell of West Haven, to pay Edwin Horton
Of Chittenden suitable sum for time and expense IN
pursuing and capturing one Julius Blanchard charged
with burglary; to com. claims.
BY LIr Renfrew OF Ryegae, relating to injuries and
damages caused on account of defective highway f.
III prnvid s. hrst, that no person shall
thau 81 900 tor personal njurIes or, second, more
than 300 tor injury to team; to general coml
On motion OF Mr.. Palmer of Jericho, adjourned.