The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1880-02-14

1
credit, and was faitly. PLACED 70 the credit OF
any other account At bis discretion. there can
be no doubt that there could oe ~ empeE .Se
| msnt IN such checking ana crenltlnR. Ine
position Of TIE accounts and CHECKS ere mat
ters OF TACT belore me Jury. ann they w, coh
tes,lnon n ID coming 70 conclusion as to their
| verdict
tn. Tha court II asked TO charge tnat:
ty- eighth OF June. 1879 there were on the books
| Of the Louisiana Savings Bank and SAFE Ds-
posit U2mpany two accounts. one OF n q Ia =
q. Palmer, Individually. exhibiting proper
reat u hls favor ~ had Ins f,ah. 20 onnok
al % enae u raws asd
And the court ~ further a-ked &c chatae:
Ihat u tha Jury flnd lr"m ~ ,s,n .ha,
9n the twent. -elEhth q ynne is.n, or eth ~
| nate that the account oI " y. IatmaL o ~
was overdrawn IN any amount; ana at me sam
time there was etanhng % nus 'naivaaaa ars',.
see Sa :" ead
ieet to his check and hat D. y. Palmer was 9
member OF said hrm. tnea th. 7 are lns.ruete
eompensate the debt to the bunk for the over.
draft duahy MS hrm with the amount que ..
him Individually by the DANG; ana u u th A.
amount que % MN lv!uMaly hhn tnh 1 Y W',
Gredltad ~ we urn ACCOUNT. theft ny nask he,ns
1he ovarn,raIa. men .heY ata insafu .,aa una
| salI rhank was IhWIu.iy Drawn anu nIeuIt'n
will not support the charge Ct emnazallng o.
| .mva,ahe W nis u.s. euafaea III .he 'AssA'o'
Aaeht. ~, .,,,..
~, anu IN =. We I uy hu I ,s-o r ~
.na. ou Tue twenty e,ga.h o. is' ~ ~ ~ -.
aeeo, n,h Of of,e Pa r' o. With aid ban
Ias =, uui nv IA n,e " s
Ala craa Al ~ ah MN. " tha NM an
eausl to The he an amount Of said overdraft BY hta
raw h NJ ahan 80 ama' sa,a hanh ~ ~
aans " ~ IN III aman ~ hs
cIealt Ipr Inc shiu uent uus ~ Mn; wv H. ~
en Sneha wa nMssha ~ w q .is III.
nhaet r. ,m,nav ~ tha hanE waa ac,naiv MI
@ nv ~ Mnaey y. .ne VAIN W.T. NV ~ Ha W.
n ,,aa wa. NE a sas ovardrait
ns ,ras ~ u, saa,,,,s sae Ma
anI Was ~ e e ',.' ~ s :,
asa'hss .ne yep, que hy h,s mi easn .ms IVY
afe .na.rue'sa .na1 .ne craving nna "reha..ha
=, s' and 70 hs @ n h
me even tna ne ~ st H. nna Tv n
rh u .aa haR o. aet he haa 70
The court o instruets the Jury tbst IL Mr..
wentx .s aM 81 nne ,s7e o. any a. INV
"viny - INV noont o ~ rradit Il uy
g ia 81 a u AZ
~ ,ae d,sats .. h ,hn |. WIS ss HIVE
IN the regular course Of p business: and sninss
there were some interposne contract With the
t " % y. 'ae usas ~ " =
unaer sueh nt cirnmmsan"es u The eourt IL
J,
co,ae thair attent, ant To- the Charge cont Aimed
in the in ,ictmant mwhather ths dsfandant. n q
palmer embesa "a AZ vouyertea To hts own Il use
the funds an tne bank. "Rnd Ia cannot ha triad
An fhis ind rtment for Cfhar alleged ofransas !.
An the court - instruots But the State Ina n
rixht 10 show. for the purpose Of proving CON
cealment any false entries In the accounts Of
tha accused. II any such axist, and for the
purpose OF showing the mal,tm ani,ss,n. OF the
accused. the State has q right to show auy other
eused or caused to be- b. male by him. aud havisv
direct connection with the matter at Issue. II
any such entries exist: and hs TO such eonnec-
ton, and a.. to the honesty or falsty OF these
The following charge IL also requested:
The jury are inst, ucted that the Louisiana
Servings BANK a s.d safe Pep 'sit COMPANY was
iistinstlon i'll respect to ita liabilities arising
from the date when those obligations were con
TINT the CORPORATION was indebted TO Il. d.
Palmer individually In 1874, or at any oher
date. It remained an obligation Of The corpora,
at INV time havs enforeet the payment. unIess
the obligation had been discharged by the
bank
'Tne court cannot inform the Jury when the
bank was Incorporated. That is matter o.
shn.n h ~ y ~ w onss sna
liabilities ot other chart red hankin. institn
tons. II Tie jury aud tia, the bank ows i the
iandaea xoes without saying That The The e ssb
SUI eAls s,, a,n .,.. .,,.,.,
- ths y. nnH proven ,s .nM any onng a,ns
Oh Tue nahk 90 Ina accused were 10 ns i.q llna,au
out OF any particular as etst ov asreamsnt ne'
tWsen MN anu snn namh, ,l ,,a nsea "a n
r,sht 70 nIset su"seaaehs 'ae't'.y Vi Ills pV
tnis credit. ,4 ., .,uo,,,, - h, ,
10 my amnu~t ~ proven 20 nave been en-
sezslen. y Il smi1lcent. nlscrepancy between
thI amount chnfRel hhn that proven is lmma-
tertA. n,
Your. verdict VIII 90 q her guilty Or "nnt
guilty. nn elther eomnt, vernlet OF guilty
n,,,ttal on both counts. WIS .AN'sA y" "'
The jury are instructed that the nro OF al
,aRau ,a,se en,r.es mau. on ,ne ooaka o. tne
or converting charged In the Indictment ok.