National Republican., 1880-03-30

n Al IL a
this court costs in this court to be paid by D. s.
skinner; opinion by Mr.. Justice Clifford.
o.b.-The Memphis and Charleston Railroad
company, plaintiff in error, vs.. the state OF len
nessee. ctc In error b. the supreme court OF Ten
neSsee; decree affirmed with costs; opinion by Mt.
ChiefJustice Waite; dissenting Mr.. Justice swayne
No. 22.@The South Z North Alabama Railroad
Company plaintlrin error, VS.. the state OF Ala
bama; in error TO the supreme court OF Alabamni
Justice Waite: dissenting, Mr., Justice swoyne; Mr.
Justice Strong did not sit at the argument and
took no part In this decision.
No. 155.-Joseph VI. Douglass, plaintiff IN error
VS. Pike county, Mo-. No 80. Smedloy Darling
ton, plaintiff IN error vs. County Of Jacksou No.
l9i, Elisha Foote, plaintiff IN error VS. County OF
Pike Mo. in error TO the Circuit court for the Dis
trict of Missouri; judgments reversed, with costs
md causes rcmnndc1, with directions TO overrule
the domurrers and for further proceedings in con-
| tormity with opinion in case No 1856 opinion by
| Mr. ChicfJustice Waite.
No 2O5.-Thcophilus s. Tontolnc, appellant, VS..
| John McNnb No. 201. Ellou b. Ponder, appel
| lant vs. Lavinla l.. dc Laundry ct al, adminisra-
trixes etc; appeals from tho Circuit Court of tho
United States for the Southern district of Georgia
decrees affirmed with COSTS opinions by Mr.. Chief
| Justice Waite.
No 2os.-Adolphus Durant, appellant. VS.. Charles
= Storrooo ct ~; appeal nom Circuit Court of the
| affirmed with costs; opinion by Mr.. Chef-Justlco
Waite.
| ~ a.
plnintln in error, vs. William Il. Dodge ct al; in
error to Circuit Court of the United States for the
| Southern district OF New York; Judgment affirmed
with costs and Interest," opinion by Mr., Chief
No. 21I-Thc United States. appellant w. r II.
Hopkins appeal from the Court Of Claims; judg.
ment reversed and cause remandcd with directions
to dismiss The petition Authority Of the United
nounced by Mr.. chief Justice Waite
| No. Sl3.-Tho Davenport & Northwestern Rail-
| way Company, nlnintit in error, VS.. Ronwich
Shaw and Crosset In error 10 Supreme court of the
| State of Iowa: Judgment affirmed with COSTS opin.
| ion by Mr.. Chief-Justicc Waite.
No. 66.-L. Whitesido ct al, appellants vs. c. j.
Whitesdei motion to vacate order ofdismissal. and
| ChicfJustCe Waite,
No. llS5.-Thc Denver and Rio Grando Railway
Company. appellant, vs.. The Canon CITY ana san
No. 1l36.-fhe Deyer and Rio Grando Railway
company, appellant, VS.. The Pueblo and Arkah
| sas valley Railroad Company;
No. ll52.-The Pueblo and Arkansas Valley Rail
| ROAD Company, appellant, VS.. The Denver ana
Rio Grande Railway Company
| No ll03.-The Pueblo and Arkansas Valley Ran
road company, appellant, VS.. The Denver ana hic
Grandc Koilway Company;
ON motion of Mr. M; Wilson, appeals dismissed
hunc pro tune as of the 25th inst per stipulation
ana consent of counsel on file.
NO 2N,-W. s.. ilunnicutt ct ol., plaintiffs II
error, US. John d. Peyton and another, legal repre-
| sehtalves, etc. ct al. argument concluded by Mr.
| Matt II. Carpenter for plaintiffs in error.
NO, 22S.-lIosea Ball ct al, appellants VS. JustiT
| i.hliBleS el Uli argument commenced Dy MI l. y
Durant of counsel for the appellants, and con
unued by Mr.. Leigh Robinson for Uppellces.
Adjourned until tomorrow at II o'clock.
District Courts.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 1--JUsrrcE MAcARTHuR.-
| Hayden vs. Chesapeake IL Ohio Canal Company
motion for new trial filed. Seldner ct al VS.. Bel
Der ct al. leave to file additional pleas pnymen
Of costs of term and $40 attorneys fees. Roach V!
lliton leave to amend declaration. Patrick an
wife VS. Benter nquisition verdict for defendant
| lO,lll
verdict for defendant, damages $40 Smith VI
kimmcll; dismissed, Lerch vs.. RiesSner: judl
ment SIX cents damages for plaintiff. Town v
Chapel; Judgment one cent and costs for plaintiff
CIRcufT COURT No. 2-JUsTICE CoX.-Clark V
Nackcy; judgment for defendant with costs kcl
dali vs., Crafty and Bern; Judgment confessed
Dunn VS.. Renrdan; judgment lOr plaintiff fOrSllS..
and interest ut six per cent. from February s. 1871
and costs Darlington VS.. Douglass; bill of eNcel
lions signed sealed and entered. Windsor IL For
vs.. Ryan: judgment for plaintiffs RothberE y
! Simpson; jury respitcd till to-day. Adjourned ii
10 o'clock this morning.
DISTRICT CouRT-(sltting in bankruptcyl-C
JUSTICE CARTTER-JOhn Hester, dismissal Of eau,
ordered. ID. W. Bliss discharge signed. Rnphae
Sawyer continued to Monday, April 5, 1880 Ben
jaman kaufman, certificate discharge issuct
George b. .Coburn, certificate discharge sgno,
, The following ease was also decided: TOsOn v
: Steamer Mcknight, decree for specific sum.
EQUITY CoURT-JuSTIcE HAGSER.-DougNs V
Lucas, pro conlesso, VS.. defendants, Gatchel an
? Fitzgerald, and appearance of absent deendnn
! r. Brown ordered. Roberts vs. Roberts; opinio
; refusing divorce filed. Walther VS.. Shanahan tin
TO take proof extended eighty days. Adjourne
till to-day.
Z CRIMINAL Court JUsrIcE JAMEs-Davd
| Townsend, assault and battery on Michael Flyn
| verdict not guilty. John Babbington. John Burli
and Michael Burke, resisting officer Mockabc
verdict of guilty rs indicted us to darlington al
8 John Burke, and not guilty as to Michael Burk
4 motion for n new trial; bonds set at $1,000 eac
, Joseph OBrien, assault and battery on James Sin
2 mons verdict of guilty, and sentenced to six
Y | days IN jail.
ASSIGNMENTS FoR TO-DAY.
SUPREME CoURT OF THE DIsTRIcr-CHTEF-JusTI
| CARTIER AND JUSTICE WYLlE.-No. 9S, Hume
Brown 100, Campbell VS.. Dobson; lO2l9, Berry
Berry ct al; 1Q5 United StGtes VS. Thompson; II
V9ndenburg VS.. Gordon; iCs, Brooke vs.. Barn,
q 10. Stegmaicr VS.. Stegm0ior; Ill, Cox VS.. NJ
!, Pherson; III, Booth VS.. Booth; III, KOighn V
!. Kaighn.
" CIRCUIT COURT No. 1-JUsrIcE MAcARTHUR.-N
l. s.. Brown ct Rl VS.. Satcr ct al; 27l, Narnell
Is Naylor 227, Green vs. sonborn; l6g somervillo '
eHecor pfoS VS. arcr aS i9 cRo Ss Kjoa XIII
a Iatta: iSl Gibson's Sons d Co. VS.. McKcever: Al
Soper vs. Woodruff ct al; 4Sj, Main ct al; VS.. Ec
y hart; 4S7 Lyons VS.. Fletcher ct al; 4S9 Baker
n Babcock ct al; 40l, Mccoy vs. Fowler 403, Day
q VS.. weide; i05. Burbridgc VS., Carpenter
CIRCUIT CouGT No. 2-JUsTIcE Cox-Regul
~ Hya iSp ForTS GXeeHriT Sod. VS. hy@si 4
CorIn vs. Du Bois ct al; 5ls Stocksill VS.. sh,
d man; 500, Hamilton VS. Wtner; $40, Patch
%, District OF Columbia; G6S, Central National Bal
c, vs. Bramhall ct al; 672, Joachim vs.. Cayls 9
~ Phelps vs. Talmnn; 6Si, DuBley Bros. VS.. Bark
q Bros: CSC DAILY VS.. the Inland and Seaboard Goa
ing Company of the y. c.; 6SS. Mills VS.. Keys
Id 693 C0beil vs.. Cross ct al; GgO Walker VS., Tag
Cos Beavans and Shaw VS.. r. I. bowman and
C. Green, garnishees Of D. A. Connolly; 100, Ar
vs. Dittrich ct al; 702, Anderson ct al. VS.. Smi
r 7Ol Baily vs.. the District OF Columbia 706, NewbI
q Sons VS.. Young; 70s, Lynne vs. Downing; 10, II
lor VS. Carson; 7l2 Gilmore vs.. BlackmaT 2
Augerman vs. Baum; ZIG, Moses VS., Carroll; I
IT. Embry VS.. Hovcy; 720, Seal VS.. Nailor and
Fobes vs. Walsh.
u; EouTTY CouRT-JUsrICR HAGNER.-No. IL, Cal
VS. Cahill; 20, Golfer VS. McAnnlly; 2l, Flanagan
SNOW; %, Peugh VS.. Leitch; %, Castell VS., La
%, limerick VS.. Dorsey; 26, Wright VS.. Patters
27, Zaptzingcr VS.. Zanzingor %, Arundel VS..
lay; %, Joyce vs.. Joyce.
CRIMINAL CouBT-JUsTICE yAmEs.-Robert Van
IT, grift John Heath, Henry Waite and James
M Munroe. keeping gaming house; John w. Rob
,c | son, assault on games Simmons; Charles Turn
assault and battery with intent TO kill J. Y. Loyt
ls James SchelI and George Number. riot and BE
Richardson. assault and battery with intent TO
JG7 Fanny Heidenhemer
FREE ADVERTISING.
III @ 9 HI IA R Sr K