Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1879-05-08
THE COURTS.
WORK OF THE MAY TERM OF DIS
TRICT COURT BEGUN.
The Calendar Called ana tho Cases Set
The Grand Jury at Its Labors-The Work
Yesterday Duly Reported for the "Globe.'
District Court.

Yesterday Duly Reported for the "Globe.'
District Court.
Before Judge Brill
The district court opened at 10 o clock A. NJ,
Judge Brill on the bench.
The grand jury was called into court and
seventeen answered to the roll-call. There
upon they were sworn in, and Hon. VIM. L.
Banning appointed foreman. Judge Brill de-
livered the usual charge, citing the statute
governing their action, and stating that there
was little business to transact, added nothing
to the formal charge. The court then proceeded
to the call of
l. Dwight Woodbury. vs. Chicago Is North
ives tern Railroad company.
2. Lorenzo Allis VS.. W. F. Davidson ct al.
8. Charles Widner VS.. Lake Superior & Mis-
sissippi Railroad company.
4. In the matter OF proceedings for delin-
quent tax, 1874, of St. Paul Fire & Marine In
surance company.
5. F. W. Tuchelt VS.. P. G. Biersach.
6. Mary Greve VS.. City of st. Paul.
7. John Wann VS.. James H. Donaldson.
s. In the matter of the appeal of Eliza A.
butcher, from order of probate court, etc.
8. John @. A. Thomas, VS.. the Lake Su-
perior & Miss railroad company.
10. Albert Scheffer ct al, executors, ETC., VS..
Gustav Willius.
II. Mary J. Ashton VS.. city Of St. Paul.
u. Dwight Benson VS.. st. Paul Harvester
works.
ID. h. B. Claain & Co. vs.. Lorillard insur-
ance company, of the city of New York.
IA. Chas. A. Zorbish VS. John A. Weide.
Is. Thomas Howard, appellant, VS.. the
board of county commissioners Of Ramsey
county, respondent.
l6. Adele Guerin VS.. the St. Paul & Sioux
City railroad company ct al.
II. Sherwood Hough vs. Charles n. Dixon.
IS. In the matter of the appeal of w. M.
Stees, owner of certain lands, from the appraise
ment Of damages made by r. w. johnson and
| act of the legislature of the State of Mime
sofa, entitled Fan act to authorize the location
of an avenue around Lake Phalan," approved
March g. 1878.
10. Joseph Lange VS.. W. L. Marston and
Thomas Ryan.
co. Alexander Moore VS. Grant & Broszeau.
81 Jane W. Rowan, appellant, VS.. The St..
Paul Water Co.. respondent.
| %. Carrie G. Murray, appellant, VS.. The st.
Paul Water Co., respondent.
%. Chas. N. Bell VS.. Henry Daingerfeld ct
| al.
"a. Bertha Golfer VS.. James Golfer.
Is. Dawson & Co. VS.. The German Catholic
Printing Co.
26. Willett Bronson VS.. Horace Austin.
! 81. P. II. Kelly ct al. VS.. VIM. l.. Hall.
%. Leonidas A. Robert VS.. Henry D. Cur
ney.
20. John Mahoney Donald Stevenson.
80. Lamprey & James VS.. Robert J. Stock
81. Henry O'Gorman, judge of probate VS..
Estate Of Nathaniel Mclean.
49, c.. W. A. Blackman vs.. Fl. B. Montgom-
cry and James King, Sheriff Of Ramsey Co.
33. In the matter of the appeal of 81. d.
Allen, executors, ETC., from allowance of claim
of G. P. Sloggy.
"a. Albert Scheffer ct al, as executors, etc.
VS.. Daniel McCaine ct al.
IS. John Parker VS.. Martin s. James.
sc. John Mahony VS.. J. A. Mclean ct al,
81. Adeline Taylor VS.. the city of st. Paul
80. Reuben Overpeck VS.. o. P. Barker.
80. George A. Moore VS.. 81. D. Quincy anc
George NJ. Flanders, late partners as Quincy 1
Flanders.
40. Samuel bearing vs.. Samuel D. Lord.
Al. Samuel D. Lord VS.. Samuel Dea1ing.
~. D. D. Merrill VS. Samuel bearing.
43. Pioneer Oil Co. VS.. Borup & Co.
"A. 81. P. Rugg VS.. Webster & Comford.
as. Clement, Morton Il Co. VS.. B. w. Ben
son & Co.
! as. Otto Montgomery VS.. Charles Faber.
, At. Michael La Barge VS.. The city of st
Paul.
As. Joseph Galina vs. The city of ST. Paul
40. A. r. Capehart VS.. Mary Kennedy.
so. M. Hers VS.. G. F. Hers.
, 81. J. H. Morong VS.. the estate Of Stephe
Denoyer, deceased.
| So. William Todd vs.. Thomas Wallace.
: S.. Cohen Bros. VS.. M. Knoll.
81. Mary Feegan VS. the city of st. Paul.
3 SIS. William +. Davidson VS.. James B. Beals
Sc. William II. Braden VS.. John ODonnel
implicated with VIM. Graham.
81. The State of Minnesota vs.. Frederick G
: Mayo.
So. Elizabeth F. Gordon vs.. Griggs & John
son.
So Simpson, Wilkinson & Co. VS.. James V
Q Allen, assignee of Williams, Mccullough g. Ce
GO. Holl & Paar vs.. s. Kinsella.
81. Farmers & Mechanics Bank VS.. State Az
ricultural Association.
81. Gimbel, Florsheim & Co. vs.. E. Bernstein
Q G3. Leopold Bros e. Co. VS. E.. Bernstein
v "a. Hart Brothers VS.. E.. Bernstein.
65. Charles Stein & Go. VS.. E. Bernstein.
}, &c. Frank J. Koran VS.. Charles Caldwell.
IL g. Thatcher Blake VS.. The Chicago, ST
: Paul and Minneapolis Railway Co.
68. Boyer, Rep Hoff & Co. VS.. Diamond
Is Hillmer.
If 50. Howard, Sawyer & Co. VS.. VIM. F. Vo
- Devn and John Wann.
- 70. Alexander Wilson VS.. The Northern P;
8 cifc r. r. Co.
IS H. Jane B. Hunter VS.. Thomas Flynn an
= T. J. Brennan.
. ". Michael Fleming, administrator of tt
8 estate of John Fleming, deceased, vs. The s
a.. Paul & Duluth r. r. Co.
70. David Motion VS.. Stephen F. Bum
10 man.
to "a. Gorge W. Wentworth VS.. Alvaren ALE
~ rs. Clemens Staub vs. Deutsche Katholiscl
:, Drick- Gesellschoft ct al.
76. Fred. II. Mcintosh VS.. Emmett Lyt]
th n. The State of Minnesota VS. John
n Penner and Sarah B. Becht, executors of Jof
~ G. Becht, deceased, in matter of appeal
ne said executors from the report Of commissio
of ers
70. Louis Fontaine VS.. Basile Landroche.
W 1oeD ;olo 1l,,,%o No.
be sessment of the board of public works in t
"a. matter of widening, opening and extension
~ Bluff street.
ny 80. Irmina Giles Vs. William Giles.
%. 81. VIM. i. Mintzer VS.. Hubert Behr a
ho Gertrude Behr.
ed Go.
20 S3. Elizabeth Vahlert VS.. Jacob Vahlert.
:, 81. Margaret Mccarthy VS.. John F. Newtt
ny SIS. Michael Mccarthy VS.. John G. Mozart
tn and John Newman.
,,e sc. Excelsior Stuve works vs.. James XII
- sheriff of Ramsey county.
ot 81. Wharton & Morton vs. VIM. L. And
,er son.
'or 88. Robert F. Jones VS.. John A. Mclean a
'o' Robert McNider.
st. 49, Lewis NJ Ramsey ct al. VS.. Benne
oh Osborne Manufacturing Co. ct al.
:, 80. Samuel D. Lord VS.. ARENAS Gale.
y" 81. Elizabeth A. Heauhers and Mary
in Heathers, Celia A. Heathers, infants, by Cy
,cv J. Thompson. their guardian, ad ltuns,
- Martin Delaney.
Ter 90. A. R. Capehart VS.. Mary Kennedy,
lily ministratrix, ETC., of NJ. A. Kennedy.
90 90. Maurice Auerbach ct al vs.. The
Sueur Mill Co.
OF "a. The Colties White Lead and Oil Co.
a Williams, Mccullough g. Co.
10 IS. Bridget Poupeney and husband VS..
~ ward Langevin.
7ell Sc. Edwin s. Chittenden, receiver of Mu
ain y Bensons' vs.. German American Bank