The New York herald., 1879-10-23
COURT CALENDARS THIS DAY.

SUPREME COURT-CHAMBERs-Held by Judge
to-day will be called tomorrow. The assessment
calendar will also be called tomorrow.
SUPREME CoURr-GENERAL TERM-Held by judges
Davis. Brady and Ingalls.-Nos. 1885, 167. 16s. 169.
17O ILL., 172 IT. 49, 1s5. 247 24s. 249 250. 25l 1884,
supnEME CoUnT-SpEcrAL TERM-Held by Judge
Van VorstLaw and fact-Nos: 20S. g. 125. 102. 167.
2a5 20l. 49, ls2 1913. 242 252 256. 262 267 80. 2O3
140 Isl, ia. 2l9. 22!. 2i5. 255. 26l. 266.
SUPREME CoURT-CIRcUIT-Part Held by Judge
Barrett Nos. 1000. 1902 ss7. 1888. 1447. 116O. ll3
25o 1725, lO79. i2l7. 1890 l227 49, l1G6. Part =
Held by Judge Lawrence.-Case on-No. l124H, Pet
sr9wa VS. Toshsy No day calendar. ,aa ,s Part Heid
325 1927 191 11S7. 11SS 1882 119l. 1902 1l97 1885,
ll99. 1903. 1904. 1905. 1907. 12os. 12l6.
SUPERIOR CoUIr-GENERAL TERM.-Adtourned sine
SUPERIOR, Counr-SpEcIAL TERx-Hold by Judge
SUPERIOR counr-TRIAI TEnM-part Held by
Judge Sedgwick.-Case on-No. $40. Brown Gun
nison. No day calendar. Part 2-Held by Judge
SpoirNos. 367 451. 49, $751; 524. 525. 44S. 55l $685.
$685. $685. 245, 179 $40. 49, 52s 514 521 $751; 443 5l2
5l5 TAO 2s5. 1856. s47. l5s 257. ss7. Part sHed by
2S3 635. $40. 1885, 422. 423, 429, 431, 1872
COMMON PLEAs-GESEnAL TERM.-Adjourned sine
COMMON PL.As-spEc1AL TEnM-Held by Judge
COMMON PLEAs-EouIrY TEnx-Held by Judge J.
F. Daly-Caso on. No. s Franklinite Zinc Company
vs. Silsby). No day calendar.
COMMON PLEAs-TRIAL TERM-Part Held by
Judge q. P. Daly.-No day calendar. Part Held
Hunt. No day calender
MARINE counr-rnAL TEnM-part Held by
Judge Goepp.Nos 272 442. 2S9 2S17, 145, 3614 3497
24s 264, 49, 3697. 269 IL. 1876 275. 292 Part 2Ad-
journed until November 3. Part 3-Held by Judge
Sheridan.Nos 3l4l. 3l3S. $685. 302. l5O no. 257 "a
Court OF GENERAL sEssroSs--Part Held by
Judge Cowing.-The People Edward Frank. fe-
gerald and Martin J. Meehan, burglary; Same vs..
James Martin. grand larceny; Same VS.. Joseph Ii.
Farley, assault and battery: Same David Porter.
excise; Same vs. Francisco A. Il. Sanbold and Joas
b. Bevilaqua, forgery; Same vs.. Vinsor Camphor,
robbery. Part 2-Held by Judge Gildorslccve.-
The People w. Thomas Bennett larceny from the
person; same vs.. William Reid and Thomas j. Reid.
robbery; Same vs. James McCabe felonious assault
aud battery; Same vs. Annie Tobn, grand larceny;
Same Alexander Dow and Philip Knot, burglary;
Same VS.. James II. dilroy. excise.
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT CouRr-Hcld by Judge
collector.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CouRT-Hcld by Judge
Choatc.-J. II. Manning VS.. Steamtug Grace Fec; J.
Grady vs.. Bark l.. Albro; A. Merolio VS.. wiiliam
Ruger ct al; Traders Insurance Company vs. Steam
tug U. $: Grant ]. q. Unnevehr vs.. Steamship
Hndoo; II. Fleiu ug steamship Stancliffc; II,
Rockaway vs. Barge New baltimore; W. A. Duoli vs..
Steamship Niagara George Matoi w. steamtug A.
VS.. Steamtua A. u. Preston, J. Smith ct al vs. O. H.
Drew OF al; Charles Grum VS.. W. L. Frost ct al.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
FEDERAL AND STATE JURISDICTION
OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DEvENs IN THE TEN
NEssEE cAsE-TRApE MARK GOODS
WASHINGTON. Oct. %, 1870.
The following business was transacted in tho su-
preme Court of the United States to-day
No. LOIS. Albert Grant. appellant. VS.. The Ph9nx
Mutual Lite Insurance Company.--Appeal from the
supreme Court OF the District OF inbia-On mo-
ton OF IL. 4. Merrick docketed aud dismissed, with
costs.
No. 720 The State of Tennessee, plaintiff VS..
James M. Davis.-Upon division OF opinion in the
Circuit Court of tho United States for tho Middle
District OF Tcnnessce.-Arkrmcnt continued by AS.
sistant Attorney General Smith and Attorney acn-
oral Dcvens for defendant, ana concluded
by James q. Fi,ld for plaintiff. In con.
tinuing the argument In behalf of tho
defendant to-day Attorney General Dcvons main
tanned that both the Judiciary act OF 1857 ana tho
subsequent legislation nucr consideration pro-
viding Tor the removal OF certain cases rom the
State to the federal courts valid and constitu.
tional that tho right of h state to- vindcate and
its peace Is subject to the gravcr rights OF
tho United states to preserve and vindicato their
powers: that the act complained OF done by tho
defendant IN tho performance OF his official
duty to the United States. and that this
fact constitutes the federal ingredient which gives
jurisdiction to the federal courts. Tho right of tho
United States to thus protect its officer and to hear
accusations against him IL Indispensable to the e-
forccment of federal laws. The gravity of the charge
can make difference to the right II statutory
process will authorize tho removal of indictment
Tor assault las in tho case OF jenkins 2. Wallace Jr