Arizona silver belt., 1879-05-09

argued, submitted and taken under advnement.
 Levi Ruggles vs, Peter R Brady The motion to set aside summons and complaint in this case vas argued by c0uasel on both sides. submitted and taken under asiYsement.
 M x Thsrsing rs. 7be WebfooG s M and M Co-The demurrer ia shis case was argued Oy counsel. sub
 nittsi and taken nnder adYBemens=
 Kerr and Barnes "a, Robt Lem mon--Roth theaq csses were ordered placed on tbe calendar.
 AeDry M Porter gs. Read and Hammond-The demurrer in this ease vas confessed, and plaintiF vas granted ten days to amend.
 R0bt Robbins ys, Jne J Deune, appellant--The appellant moved For new trial. After argument eF counsel on both sides, the court took motion under adyisemen
 APRIL 25TH
 J c Batemaa vs, Miami Mirine Co, Martin " Bremen, ct als,-Ths case came on regularly to be heard. Summers for plaintiff and Swift for defendants. DsfeAdants attOrneg vas allowed to withdraw answers heretofore filed on the part of the Miami Mining Co. and M " Breaea. and dsfendant Bremen was allowed to file amended answer. after all the evidence was in and tue argu- ments Of counsel concluded, the ease was submitted and taken under a.- visement, leave was granted to both plaintiff and defendants to submit briefs within two days
 w Kngsbury vs, l. J Wilson, appellant-0n motion of appellant 1t vas ordered by the court that tbis case be placed ca the calendar, and set for trial on 3d prOximo.
 c A SWasey was admitted to prac- tice as an attorney of this court
 E Yeach vs, Miami Mining Go, appeIlant-Case ordered placed on and set for trial to nor row
 Hammis and Wicks ys, Miami Mining Co, and L J Webster, appel Iants-Case ordered placed oa the calendar and set for trial on Sd prox.
 APRIL 26TH.
 J J Vosburgh vs, L J Webster, appellant-It was ordered bY the court that the appeal be dismissed.
 James Hamilton Ys, J P Stanley, lppeIlant-The appeal iH this ease was ordered dismissed and stay of proceedings granted for thirty days.
 T Nieholls ys, c E Royce and Mrs WhitloE, appelIants-Itwas or. iered 6y sks c0urt that a new trial be granted in this case.
 MN ThArsing vs, The Webf0ot $ N Co-The demurrer in this case vas oyerruled and seven days granted defendant wherein to answer.
 II B Summers ys J D Wilon, ct als, and Fl 5 Summers ys J D YIl- son, appellants-ItWas ordered by the court that the appeal in the above two cases be dismissed.
 CL Crtelvon ys Champion M Co, l. J Webster and Mary Ryon- The demurrer filed in tbis case by defendant Webster was confessed ky plaiRt.if and 30 days granted nlaia- IiG to amend.
 Norton and Stewart ys s B Chap n-The demurrer in this case was 0verruled and defendant allowed one iay to atsWer.
 E Veach Ys Miami II and II Go, sppellanf-This case came on rega- Iarly to De heard on appeal. After of counsel, t was orderes sY the court that the appeal be dis missed.
 Fritz Eve ys ladislao Catalan--- The default of the defendant having sntered, on motion of plaintiff the sase nas oyerruled, placed on the calendar and decree ordered in ac- ;Ordaace with the prayer in plain .if g complaint.
 JV Wilson "a Samuel Bosuek--- The default of the defendant having ,een duly entered. on notion oF plaintiff. is vas ordered by the court hat ths case placed on the calen- lar. and that decree be granted )laintia in accordance With the prayer of che complaint.
 George Ross, es al, vs Danube Mining Co Plaintiff moved for q lecree of foreclosure of mechanics ien, tbe proofs being offered, it vas
 CONTINUED oN FOURTH PAGE.