The Leavenworth weekly times., 1879-06-12
UNITED STATES COGRT.
The Usually Large Number of Cases
Before That isOdy Yesterday.

| CRIMINAL.
The United States W. r ward Cook ct al
dismissed by district attorney.
| LAW.
| w Montgomery vs. Jacub Sims and ]
J. Mitchel-Dismi-sedb by plaintiff.
| Derrick a. January VS. The Board OF Com
| miSsioners Of the County of Johnson, state O
KansaS-OTder Ior peremptory writ.
Mary shawvan el al VS. William NJ. Corn
| Ing-Continuad-
| William NJ Kaiser Us the Board of Com
| mlSsioners OF the county OF Johnson-Ordel
| for peremptory writ
| Appleton, Soyes * Co. VS. The Municipal
| Township OF Center, in the county of Wilson
| State OF KaHsas-Continued.
Tie Valley National Bank of 81. Louis
| Missouri, " Andrew Wilson ct al-Contin-
u-d.
Nathan Pesr!ty IS ID. d. Streeter-Dismiss-
| ed for want Of prosecution.
Tne United states of America VS. Barnabas
ID. .Palmer-Coutinued.
Charles T. Lewis VS. the Board OF County
Commissioners Of Barbour county, Kansas
Continued at defendants request
Henry StrongvS Rock Creek Township,
:, fIerson county, hansas-Continued.
Franklin Brown VS. T. ]. Peter-Continued.
Francis \. osborn vs. the Board of County
commissioners of Chase county, kansas
Judgment for plaintiff.
The United States of America. ex rel. Mil
ton Eames VS. the Board of EducatIou of the
city of Chetopa, OF the State of Kansas-Or-
der for perempt"Iy writ
The CItizens' Bank vs. Frank W. Brooks
Defendant 10 answer in sixty days and con-
tinued.
Anna Eughes, administrative, etc, Us The
Missouri Pacific Railway Company-Contin-
ued by consent.
First National Bank ofGeneseo, Illinois VS.
The First National Bank of Paola-l ontin-
ued
auston COrbin vs. Board of County Com
mis,loneTs of Washington couniy-Motion
George II. Philips VS. Joseph Il. Wood
Continued.
James 1ully vs. T. C. .Jones-Continued.
Charles l.. Flint vs. The Board of County
Commissioners OF Crawford county, kansas
Demurrer 10 second count OF answer with
drawn.
The National Land Company VS. Jenkin W.
horri>-COutInued.
same vs Sune-Continued.
same " Peter rBiescne-Dismissed by plain.
eame VS. Thomas :. Barton-Default: judg-
ment Tor possession damages waived.
same VI Jedkin W. .Morris-Continued.
Same " same onIinued.
same VS. Patrick O'Mears-Dismissed by
plaintiff.
The Singer Manufacturing Comrany VS. Ma
son ana Mary =. Msson-Plsintiff has le.ve
10 iie a ne~ undertaking for attachment IN
fifteen days
Joseph f. Robertson VS. 8. T. ZImne,mar-I
Jury waived; trial 10 court per Judge Foster
as Ter stipu alton
Buckingham sturgis VS. Board Of County
Commissioners Of rankin counry-Deiauli:
Judgment for plalntiff for x5122 Os
Carnes, Agerter x Go vs. A. j. Davis-De.
fanIt' Judsrnent for plaintiff. |
JsmSs Grant vs. Tne CITY OF Fort Scott
same VS. Johnson counfy-Dismiss,d at
plaintiffs cost by agree ment
EQUITY.
John y. shaw vs. James NJ Spencer auI
deed ordered.
The Poop rs SAYINGS Bank VS. ]. G. John.
sou and l.. NJ Rg-s-Stricken from docket.
The NJ, line Piow Company VS. wi liam
Cubbon-tontinoed-
Lie Asso 'istion Of America VS. W. Brock
way and Mary Jrne Brockwsy-Ccntinued.
Louisiana Hurst. and louisiana Hurst rusr-
dlsn, &c. VS. John I. Hurst-Continueu
Tue Kansas Pacific Railway Company VS.
tinued by consent.
George ". Crane vs. George W Martini
! sson,inued; time for lroof extended 10 octo-
Ii. -. Bolsenos VS. Thomas Evans. sarah
A. 6raVes ard Carl A. krause-g on iiiued
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
on p;iny W lhomas u. hDffaker Ell al-Con-
tinued. |
" iliism Wallerton VS. James L Green ct al
Augustus q Coleman VS. John w. Reed
Order at rules taking bills sss conferred and |
set aside: answer stricken from the files |
cave to nie answer TO merits verified at JulN |
rules; decree OF foreclosure on cross bills. |
te Master
, Richard King VS. ravid W. Powers 81 al
hnie on King 10 piesd. oemur or answer TO
cross Dill of D. W., u. Il. and James W. Pow. |
srs, and to the cross biils Of Blu skley by Mon.
day, Junea -
miss q. -
Herman Narkson. assignee &r VS. John A. |
hnideTman ct al-submitted and fiual de- |
.fs-.
James Fl. Ralston VS. Patrick Nprnbv a,a,
Dism sea Tor want OF prosecution without |
prejudice.
National Land Company vs. David w. Pow.
without prejudice
solomon Foster vs. q. w. Nimarks-By con.
END suhatttnfOf hill AID.