, 1879-02-08

ouuee nouke1t "as t"eA eAAeu ana exam
ined by Mr.. cloudy. llo said that .acoFgc II.
Walker, who had appeared rs a witness In this
investigation appeared before him III answer to
,1,o r,,,o vh,cl, Il. b,,, ,ntnr., .,r ,a tas..,.
~. .,.a s'," ~ u. '4 ~ ~, "o .ssus"
uay o. 1"o rus Mf' Asnson "aa a's attotneS
No written answer waa maue to tic rule, but
i. .tntcl tia, In h.1 1aa 70 fron, ,bn 1,o,o,sor
~, 49,, -. .-s,,., ,ss sss..a,,.. t1''-';, ~
a.Ia tA'' no "ou.u Nv eo1's'uosaoy '"eo'ntnoaea
by the proposed construction Of M elevator
through bis apartments. 4 day or two before
The return day Of the ru,c. Mr.. Walker came
tnto ri. rhon,hn,e nm morn1oo. ou,t .a,1 i,
'"sS sag luminous o'e 'H''s'''.' "..' "a" ~
cans for the protection Of tile Court. lilo
told Sfr. Walker that hts rulo Was rcturnabtc
tp open court. and That At the propor time hn
wou|t, layo n fuIi lcarlna. Ito had m rccoi.
lection Of being abrunt viii, him. INV mora than
DC woald be Win any other person that camc IN
when ho was busy. ifo might have been littlo
curt, because he was usually rcry busy In tho
morntnr With bankrupty matters.
lid Sou STATE 10 him tl'at Ills matter must
bc presented In open courtf'
"Ycs, sir, I told him there was the proper
n)aro to near ~
h"" 4o"4 was Iss"t oo'ose tao psoceea!ncs
did take place In open COURT"
Well, have only this recollection, that 1t
WAS betveru tl,o time ru1c n1st vas granted mud
e'H y is'u.m - NJ. NY ~ ~ ts,! u.u .u'o' -.
=, ,esr uMS auIser .,nt attcneht you WISH 10
't'n~s T. ~ .,, t..x,1 ~ ...t ~ uut't.a
i'm ena.io, =; IT,, s, @ osed y. to ,1o, i
.oc a.spossaou " s.c sasc' uat I's ElGnts e9ula
W n.i.p'! Etot.e.e1 y ~ taesesshsnt ol ~
uaanaees Wae4cssf % 's snu9la oe heeeftaioe1 What
nss "s e. tys1 'u., " & s enanss5 LINZ
pfooanty .t' . "aheI .,t won !. Aave ~ 3ne pFsicRe
III. ar.I, t. ~ ~" ~ o 9
r II II t's sas scr, nronyeo, uafn 10 n ''Ss ho
~ ILL. y. VIZ scttoea a,'.t GunseHenGe ~ nn, nc
pu.t ~, ~ tsG ' tp sa' pf XIX w. LTD" .Ae
y" tso M ,,. ~. ~ to T., ~ te.sa "
osness, or 10 60 S.la stay y, ,a,e',. an naSo wat
eseI ua'.'aC w esIs'a''eo pfopef'y awa1aea 10
NV ~ riiss.a VII Suns' ,r.. .,,, ,. t,.,,,,..,
nt' ~. Gu'uesso-t" ,. u'a }o"t lutisu!ctlon
oses ti'ae soonl a3'Se' u '1'ake 'uis l'npFosc'
nGnt1 II,s,, n,,,a.,. ,s1,ox. ,x III, a,.,
1uukc n'ouRett-lnete WA oilt hle9 70
.n.esost ~ % .o p.en'tscs.
ta mostRaSoI eins prei.!sos ,acse WA !a5se oa,
lng, aaa Meso!vsr ,, was anPolntea . TO LAKE
pusscsssou ot tnc paS'ses a''11 tent tnc!,, ny,
taHe s4ca euro .! tEehi o. NerelSes slnllia
Inks o. suea ptopssaS; aanl rom tlnie tn t'sne 10
sspoi't ~ a'e t1us[i nut M ast ,Geherasy m',t,er
~ ~ a!test!oa u w H. en"rs % .of 's conservation
nt nc Fropelty. 4ne aascevGf, y! sosna torti,'
because tl.at , WIS sl!9 H. &oT,ainafy lor = na pray
essasy 70 out IN e!evstor into tie building IN
ors'er 10 nsnpe!ts nzn ,tna,, ac uppSE rao,ns. a.
or'!cf w. mnac u'feealn: ~ or a1lo"1lle htm 10
pat " ~ elevator NJ the s1pe"ss 81 ths esentei
t''''% 49, '~s~ e'~sA1
tton etatu @ oT NE long-;ls f. @ 'teeeiser made knowa
10 my unat t.nt az. na'ktt WAY oDstfuelans
OF interfering Wit ta u u ts'c execution OF tue
1satr e. t ". hou oT .,,a rus ,,, WE sn,esSa @
shonl not es resttalnea from ,n'.rtet,ng With
stfugton ol 1ne eleYHt9E.
hnht Is rue psaet!co in your CouIt ~ ro-
Eala ~ Wy 'eAponso ~ sucA suttst are they
permitted TO hs lnate orally or Is There rnlo
requiring wrltten atiawcrr'
y, !MrIc 10 no tn!e reaulfihe them 10 ~, po maae
N Wtitlng' harllss eah l'lake thetn uraliy or IN
"rltlhE. as tncy cnoose. IL Ras oeeh q9lte cf,tn'
mon Within the last two years, s!t'ee iho forr.
ciosnre o. haoftsaeGs has hcsoll'c 10 general
licEc ~ ths c'tY, 1of NeGslPefs 10 ASK 1or rulo
asanst 1 tenants to sotn1,sl them IT, to- pay t!e!r
Court, W JuuEe ur0lnMola nl!ti tnyseli' TINT
Whcn the tennl!fs "cre matte parties " Tho bill
the runt eoaiu ee coliecleu " summary pr-
crcalng IN tue ioteelususo caso,-'l!at u: "
dta not pay hlh tcht: tne prcn!ses could 10 w"
catcd bY q WIFI fss''!ne from Ihe court. 1t bus
hecn quite eoilltlon procedure Tor tenants 10
DC bro1Sht 10 Who rtiusca of neglected
10 bay thesr rent, anu a. ful1 ulsl
would 10 H,aae upon @Eem elthcf 10
pay tue Ecnt ~ certaia time or
sIrFcn.ier M W M nc premlsee, y nelns procedure lh
which tie Court had Jurisdiction, both Of the
property and oi thy party, tlle tenants bolng
generally ,nn1c partscs to the forceiosurc: but
IN tt!is case 40 not think NJ. Walker was u
party 10 Inc suit. Tic was . tohant under the
CauIt,-that !s, under tue Receiver"
Mt. 0oudy-In suetl eaaca. relief was given 10
the landlord III regard to possession, without
requiring proceedings botorc Justice of tho
peacei
,kdge Dlodgcte--Yes, str, tho sa1ne relief Is
administered thAt tho Receiver would hare
hgalnat tae Party ~ anotE'er lnrtn.
ton naYe Acaru Luz statesncht made TO-DAY
about acseIne Or plail which WIS beIng carried
9ut ~ tesatu 10 tlie a4altn u illo uasdcn Ctsy
Insurance. cunlpahy. WI na9 you whether,
unfins thr tift'o lhAt eaao was pond1hK before
YOU soa llau any k1owlsIeu Ut information Of
any suci' stslrtne or l,lal1t' ,.-.
haa no knpwieslKo OF anv scheme o. plan
N tcletehGo 70 ;ae .naitcf Mhttl t!ie pet1tteh 70
ST. asde tlie rue wA1ytl "aA granted On tha MP
ht!catlu1. OF Slssen q patlsun. ~ that TING Mr
bcekwish saanr II, wltt1 !ta pctlt'on, and It wns
!vaa a. lcnEtl; would not say from reeollce-
tsosl whc1llcr lhGsr was any ore oppoainH Il Or
not; but reeolIcet ,l1e tact seemed to DO ad-
United tlat thls Cotnpany "us o'dcaSorlng, ~
lar ~ possible, 10 adjust 'ts affairs without CO.
hs thEo4Sh hahEraptcy. u1al lf9'il tllat lime on
probably "as possessed Of suchtnIormatton ~
MA& ujclUSE4 III HAT httt3Un. AlI4 no IuftHEF.