The daily intelligencer. [volume] (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1879-11-29
DISTRICT COURT At >EEILi-s
COON.

Under the uew lay lie winter term
Of tho Di-,r.c. Court for Pierce couaty,
TO be held AZ tie county seat. VII be
gin on Monday next, DocelnOcr Isl.
Judge Greene viii pr, side Cases az
follows are nos Oh tie docket, the law
yers named being engaged therein:
No lG1. Territory Of Washington
vs. jacob Faust; indictment FIR petit
larceny; continued from last term. l
Ballard for the Territory; James Nc
Naugh. for defendant.
l6S. Same Va same; Indictment for
defacing marks on sheep; continued
from last term.
81. j n Dolph V, John & u MUIR
ray; ejectment; continued from last
term; II G Stru,e, for plaintiff; White,
Ballard aud Clark fox defendants.
"a. james Fulton vs. J b Byrd AID
William Byrd; action on lromissory
note; J Z Judson for defendant.
70. Pierce county VS. J NJ Downyy,
et a., action on official band; Ballard
and S c Hyde for plaintiff; strive aud
Mcknight for defendants,
50. Samuel McCaw rs W IL F!ytt
and Lemon; action on promis ary
note; S G. Hyde for defendant.
1877. Henry Andrews VS. Mary Mad
den; action to que. titIr; J Il Lewis.
c W Hartman and L Evans, for plain
tiff: ii u Strive for defendant.
I29 In the matter o. The insolvency
Of G II Ryan; IL G Strive.
1873. Thos Armstrong vs. II Smith:
tort; Mcknight Bros for plaintiff; II
q Strive for defendant
1856. Corbe;t & McC!eay vs. Geo II
Ryan. ct al: + Clark for plaintiff; II G
Strive for defendant.
1876. Z Meeker vs. Puget Gouui
Manufacturing Company; injunction;
Mcknight Bros for plaiutif, Lewis ard
Clark for defendant.
l46. Geo w Crittsn1en vs. james w
Law, et at; foreclosure; 5 G Hyde for
plaintiff; G. W Hartman for defendant.
1853. MT Ward rs + Meek.r and G
Fl Spinning; SANDER; Lewis AID Clark
for plaintiff; Midnight Bros for do
PENDANT
159. 4 Gardela IS T. Moeler;
Nash. Larrabee and lT,nford tor plain
tiff; Mcknight Bros for defenda,'.
1876. Era Meeker vs. William Lane ;
M Nsught Bros for plaintiff; L,rrabee
and Hanford and Clark for defendant
100. Z Meoker, sgeut for the estate
of NJ Walker, deceased. - A Gardella;
Mcknight Bros foc plaintiff; Hanford,
Nash and Clark for defendant.
Il Meeker, agent. etc. appellee. vs. a
Gardella, appellant; appeal; Mcknight
Bros for plaintiff; Lirrabee and Han
ford for defendant.
1863. NJ b Stacy Va lGeorgs II
Ryan ct al chancery; j II Lewis.
1863. Mt Ward VS. Chilberg Bros.
tort; Lewis and White for plaintiff;
Larrabee, Haufcrdeni Nash for defend
| ant.
10. Thaddeus Sherwood vs. his
creditors; insolvency; T Sherwood in
propria persona.
Ill. + Meeker VS. Puget Sound
Manufacturing Company; appeal case
McNAught Bros.
li7. Cleudennin & Miller vs. J NJ
Rains; confirmation of sale IF real ca
tate: s G Hyde fer defendant
las. S Judson vs. ID Corcoran, # al,
confirmation Of sale: z Judson.
l12. W Hfifs VS. N II Look: attach
men'; Hall and Young for defendant.
1i3- Fredsickson vs. Hanson. Ack-
erson x Co; damages; Larrabee. Han
ford and Nash,
ia. In tha matter Of the probate
and contest Of the will Of John G Hill =
dre,h. deceased, Harry org. petitioner
and contestant, VS. Al Whipple. execu-
tor: & W Hartman for plaintiff; Nc
Nsught Bros and : c HYDE for defend
ant.
11o ii + Suksiorf VS. Peter Leber
action on proml,sory note; Strive &
Leary for defendants.
ls6. NJ j Cogswell Us O II Annis;
| same: + Evans - Herald.
TE1ncrr-D I'm