National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-23


SUPREME COURT or THE DlsTRICr-CHiEF. JUS
TrCE CARTIER AND JUSTICES HAGNER AND JAMES
Dauphin VS.. Key; bill dismissed without prejudice.
Filth Baptist church VS.. Baltimore & Potomac
Railroad Company; judgment below affirmed. Ia
re estate John Wagner on argument. Vandcnburg
VS.. Clymer ct AL Injunction denied.
CIRCUIT COURT No l--JusTICR WYTIR.-strong
VS.. District Of Columbia hearing In progress.
CIRCUIT CouEr No. 2-JusTiCg Cox.-Shca vs..
Smith: verdict for plaintiff for SlS270 with inter
est. Van Riswick VS.. Hsnlink discontinued.
Hayden Blunden vs. Mechanics National Bank
garnishee; Judgment OF condemnation; jury dis
charged until Monday next.
EQUIrY CouRT-JusTlcE observation-disclosures
u Hamilton W.. Kelly ct al; trustees second report
and distribution confirmed. In re estate Robert
Foutroy. o lunatio; John II. Nichols appointed
trustee. Utermehle vs.. Utermehle; order limiting
time to complete testimony. winder VS.. Porter ct
al; cause consolidated with McManus VS.. Porter ct
al. National Metropolitan Bank VS.. John HiLz ct
al; referred 10 Is. Zeyerly to take testimony. Van
Pa,ten. administrators, W.. Palmer. administrator
time limited for taking testimony to seventy days.
Bayno VS.. MeBlair; leave 10 take dispositions
Spaids VS.. Spalds; time extended for taking dep0
sitions. Gerecke W.. Gerecke ct al; auditors re-
port confirmed Rose vs. Rose reference TO j. N.
Oliver. Collins VS.. Collins; decree of divorce.
Holmes w. Holmes; amony and counsel fees
order continued until final hcaring. Jaiiray VI.
Grant; motion to strike out plea overruled.
Latham vs. Latham aiimony of 80 per month
on calendar. Sims VS. Sims: testimony ordered
closed within ten days De Vaughn VS.. De Vaughn
Kenaday. Nailor ct al. vs. Comfy; motion for in.
Junction aud receiver oyerruled. Palmer VS.. Carr
ct all restraining order discharged. Stewart vs.
Beverley; report of special auditor confirmed and
costs divided. ThOrnwny vs. Shuster OF al; re-
straining order issued. Davis Vs. Huyck; order 10
show cause.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR MONDAY.
SUPREME Court OF THE DIsTEICT-CnfRFJUsTIC
CARTIER AND JUSTICES HAGNER AND JAMgS.-NO.
l47, United States vs.. Perkins: l3l, Albright vs..
Emery ITO, McCarty vs. Mccarthy 1853. Washington
Brick Machine Company VS.. Griffin; 159, Bar
wood estate; 16O, United States vs. Stone; lGI,
Strong VS.. "Out guard" (patent appeaD; n,
United States VS.. Jones; Sc, Prather vs. Hill.
CIRCUIT COURT No. l--JUSTIcE WYLrE.-No. 1906.
Wood & 60. VS.. Grahami.c " Trinidad Asphalt Paw.
ing Company; III. Adams VS.. District OF Columbia;
l75. Shehnn vs. Reilly; 300, Spaids vs. Cooley; 207,
Wolf x Curtis VS.. Augensein 3Gi Lynch ct uX. VS..
District of Columbia 3i7, Makcly vs.. Cottrel Bros;
35l, Matthews Administrative vs. Baldwin CT al;
500, London IL Manchester Platc-GGsS Company,
limited, VS.. Holmes; $40, ChGpino vs.. Taylor; 39l
Wood VS. Darlington ct al I23, Poikinhorn vs.. Dyer
ct AL 127. Parker Vs. MCChcsney: 1875, Wall vs. Rob.
ins0n; I39. Kennebec Ice Company VS.. inland &
Scaboard Constiug Company; al, Herfurth vs.. Cor
AS. Seal VS. Neilor; AL United States VS. Mattoon
ct al; 40. Ianahan vs. Young ct al. i5l, Smith &
Wimsatt VS.. Long ct al, garnshees; 455, Petit &
Drip VS.. Brown ij7, SGldner Il Son VS.. Bicber et
al; iG3, Holmes vs. Kirk; 49, BaSshor G. Co. VS..
Hill; 1863. Stanton VS.. WrOe.
Equity COURT JUSTICE MAcARTHUR.-No. o.
CHsner VS.. Langley 81, shaw VS.. Bassett 3S, Cow
man VS.. Cowman 80, Lowe W.. Zantzlnger 40,
COhil Va. Cohil: Al, Lowe VS.. Randall; ~ Heavens
vs. Hughes 49,, Lewis VS.. Johnson "a. Miller Vi.
Miller %, Mattoon VS. McGrew.