The Valley Virginian. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1865-1895, 1879-09-25

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS.
our last issue the proceedings of the Supreme
Court of Appeals were as follows:
THURsDAY.-A. II. H. Stuart VS.. the
Valley Railroad Company, motion to dismiss
overruled and Judgment of the Circuit re-
versed. Case sent back for new trial.
Opinion delivered by Judge Moncure, Judge
Christian delivering dissenting opinion.
Hinton VS.. Hinton, from Rockingham, de-
cree of Circuit Court reversed. Opinion
delivered by Judge Christian, all the judges
concurring.
Linn & ais, trustees, vs.. Carson's admir-
& ais, from Frederick. Decree of the Cir
cult Court confirmed. Opinion delivered by
Judge Anderson, all the judges concurring.
Grubbs VS.. Suit (Wytheville case). judg-
meat Of the Circuit Court reversed and
new t1ial awarded. Opinion delivered by
Judge Staples, Judges Christian and Burks
concurring therein.
Hartman & ais, vs.. Burnell & ais. (Wyt'e-
Vile case) decree of the Circuit Court con-
1irmed. Opinion delivered by Judge Burks,
Judges Christian, Anderson and Staples
concurripg. Judge Moncure did not sit in
the last two cases.)
Sron vs.. Ruleman, &C., from Highland
county. Partly argued by H. w. Shelley
for the appellants, and continued for further
hearing tomorrow
FRIDAY.-Linn & ais. vs.. Carson's admir-
& ais. Motion by counsel of appellees for
rehearing of decision announced on yester-
day, and time taken to consider the same.
Siron VS.. Ruleman's EXT & ais. Argued
by Judge Fultz for appellees.
McAllisters Ex'rs, &c., vs.. Stack, from
Allegheny. Argued by J. r. Tucker for
appellants.
SATURDAY.-Sironv VS.. Ruleman, &c. Ar
gued by II. W. Shelley for appellant, and
submitted.
McAllister, &C., vs.. Stack. Argued by
H. W. sheffey for appellee, and continued
for further hearing.
Court not in session on Monday, the
Judges being employed in writing opinions.
Y.-McAllister's executors &C.,
VS.. John J. Stack, from Allegheny county.
Argued by II. w. Shelley for appellee, and
by II. st. G. Tucker for appellants, and sub
United.
Knck &c., vs.. Knick, from Rockbridge
county, continued till next term.
| Miller & ais, VS.. Miller's adm q ais,
from Augusta county. Argued by Thos. c.
Elder, for appellants.
| WEDNEsDAY.-The petition OF John II.
Pedego for an appeal from a decree of the
Circuit Court of Henry county, reLdered at
May term, 1879, in the case OF Henry Tuggle,
receiver &C., VS.. Psdego & ais, refused by
ali the judges.
Miller &c., VS.. Miller's admir- Sc. Argued
by Geo. NJ. Cochran, jr., for appellees, and
by II. w. Shelley for appellants, and sub
mitted.
Hammer &C., We. the Commonwealth fol
use of Minnick, from Rockingham county
Yancey 6 Conrad for plaintiffs in error. and
Shands and Harnsberser for defendant in
error, submitted on briefs.
Gentry VS.. Allen e ais, from Rocking.
ham. Roller for appellant and Compton
for appellees. Rule discharged, and case
submitted on briefs.
Morrison vs., Bauserman & ais, from
Rockingham. Harnsbeiger and Liggett fol
appellant, and Roller for appellee. Argued
by J. S. Harnsberger for appellant and J. E
Roller for appellee.
Martz &c ais. VS.. Bonersack, from Rock
ingham. Continued till next term.
Bait. s. Ohio R. r. Co., VS.. Noel's ADM
from Shenandoah county. Passed by.
Mary Lincoln's admir- w. Maupin, from
Rockingham. Grattan, Allen and Cslver
for appellant, and Strayer and Liggett FOL
appellees. Submitted on briefs.