Watertown republican. [volume] (Watertown, Wis.) 1860-1906, 1879-01-22

with notice to that effect, for the
reason that they we're either illegally
assessed or clearly imperfectly described
as it appears from the returns to the
County Treasurer of the several cities,
villages and town treasurers.
We recommend that the amount OF
| delinquent taxes which are enumerated
in the said schedule "A" be charged
back to the sveraI assessment districts
in which the lands so returned, and
remaining unsold, are respectively
situated
2. In relation to the application Of
G. Spangenberg, to have certificate
No. S5 of the sale of 1876 can eel led
for the reason that he is the owner of
the land covered by the said certificate
and that he was also the owner of said
certificate by assignment, and that he
had lost the same We would recon-
mend that the said certificate be
be cancelled on the said Span
genberg. by defiling with the County
Clerk good evidence, fixing bond ia
the penal sum of one hundred dollars.
to be approved by the County Clerk.
3. We find that he following cer-
tiicates. to wit; certificate No. 9 of
sale Of 1875 certificate No 95 of sale
Of 1875 and certificate No 81 of sale
af 1875 are invalid for the reason that
the taxes embraced 10 the same had
been ;tualy paid as appears by town
and city treasurers' receipts exhibited
| to your committee
We recommend that the said certi-
ficates, or any deeds issued upon them
be cancelled and that the amounts of
| the taxes embraced In said certificate
| be charged back to the several assess
ment di,trlcts in which the lands, COW
cred dy the same are respectively
situated.
4. We find that the following
| certificates. to wit: certificates No. lit,
~ae Of 1875, certificate No. l6S. sale Of
1873, certificate No. l52 sale Of 1874,
Gel iuicates No. 1913, sale of 1874, GER
tlficate No. 1876, sale Of 1876. certificate
No 137, sale of 1873. certificate No.
l34, sale Of 1873, certificate 1875.
certificate No. $50. sale Of 1877, GER
nficate No. ISL. sale of 1877, are iu-
valid for the reason that t ,e lands
covered by the same respectively y were,
at the time when the taxes embraced
in said certificates upon the said lauds,
| Ii
by proof t. that effect, produced before
your committee. We recommend that
the said certificates or any deeds issued
upon them be cancelled and that tie
amounts of the taxes Except the
amount of the state aud county taxes,
mbraced In the said certificates be
| charged back to the several assessment
| districts, 10 which the lands covered
| by the same are situated.
5. We 6nd last year the amount of
s3O.79 delinquent tax was charged
back to the town of Wat erloo Instead
OF being charged back to the village Of
the same name, as it appears by proof
produced before your committe. We
recommend that couaty order for the
SUN of 80 SO be drawn 10 favor of the
town Of Waterloo and that the amount
thereof be CHARGED back to the village
Of Waterloo as account Of delinquent
tax. We would further recommend
generally that in all cases Of canceIa-
ton Of certif Gates or deeds and issuing
county orders to the respective holder
of the same, or in charging back amounts
to the several assessment districts, that
the interest be computed up to aud
including the date of the last day Of
the session of this Board at the Legal
rate.
Dated Nov. 25th, 1873.
A. ? WooD,
f. GILES.
G. J LEE,
Negal assessments and improper de-
scriptions retarued to the Counfy
Treasurer tor the gear 1878 to be
charged back TO the va,'ious to,ons
dc.
SCHEDULE "A'
Oak land
Mrs. Hill pit fri 5
sec7t rl3, 220 s42 ,SO'7 imp't
Village Of Waterloo.
S. J. Conklln Sc of Sc 1
also of the s-w / of Sc /
of sec lying of Highly
running across said forty
from Waterloo to village
of Portland except 30
much as was deedel by
S j. Conklin to Alice
Wait This latter descrip-
tion includes the real es- 4a.
tate as described in the
assessment roll of 1873
as lot block and lots
3, 4, 5, 6, Z. s and blk
of I'd add of village of