, 1879-05-30
trht atone, ic snli1, wns matter Of taste any.


- | don't know exactly how much" was the"
'yon don't mean 10 sag that yos,r ernhassass-
sgae mssa 1 eTsF M I? smS,ts s fs' aassr f9 &c., p"a
~ collnt them IN, too."
"What Iewysrs' fees did you particularly
havc IN mtnt!m
thu Hcwspapers; and ha never doac It," Laugh.
TWAS 1t owing to your having tn divide With
anybody my norton Of tho money you received
o' so. n, 1'''!'''"Y ~. Novcr divided wt,,
nut tent. Some folks eanee to mo and wanted
money; alnl some suetl mc.n
'Hntnc folks did nak yHn to divide, tllcna"
'Yer, mn! aonIc sncd lne."
"Wlln sucl yuuaf .....
Tic witness rcnllcti Tint ono Of the "fo1ks"
was man named y. 7. llibbard. former CHI.
hard,'' continued Mueller, "suctl the for s5,,. |
COO. lie wantes Is Cunts n fout on every ptece |
Of stosic put into the building. The FIRST man
folks. IN 1879. Then col a letter from ('eu.
boyington, NEWSPAPER correspondent" tssn-
"WclL" said Mr.. Boutell, trying to curb the
wttleea' yoiuhity, |
"wltAT ABOUT THAT t1InnARp suIT1"
"Whcn tic stoppIug WIS, thry got q suit |
against tnc to punish nlt financially. I1ibbard |
sued me fl Cincinnati for $4,000"
"nId It have my connection with this build
lng."
HlIc clatmcl III cents on loot Of every stone
put inso the building. lla snid lie got mo the
contract through some oiher people"
"Nho were tho other pconle."
''Ho,no OF thu Jonrau! folks. Gilbert wns
vcntinll III May. t8G
Tile Court said tho examination was going
little outside.
fy}te 1f ntHr3a tnfnt FTN j}nf nal. .r1 n
pic question to allow what became Of this nrop.
esty, ulth Mueller had said soalc of II went for
luwycrs' fees to tlcfcud slsits ngatust him. Tic
lfe had understood him 10 say tic lamycrs' foes
were tho worst part u 1t.
Mr.. Hoyue and Sir. SWEET denied this In
clNrl1s. . ..
Atr. Boutcal said tho witness hal stated that a
suit WIS brought against him by Mr. 1lb',ard,
und when lc l,alel lin wllnt tic suit was ior,
Mueller went utt Into othcr nlattcrs.
A1r. swctt said that II tlcro Was anything
about the case that # was necessary to disclose,
hss client was perfectly willing to tell all about
Il. Mueller hail ind PERSONS after htnl as the
sllarK ollowcd tlc ship, ant Il Il wns necessary
to tell who they wcrc, ,o would DO 50 at otlcc.
iii ym 60 INTO T." addca Mr.. SWEET, look.
ing at Mr.: BuuteIl, "5olt'vc got I" takc It al.''
Mr.. Cnmpbell, "asll undertook TO mike ont
casu Ia ile Jury TINT Mueller Ind beeh ,1ltned
hy thla contract. Now nc llnve the rtuht to
slow wherc this money went II looks nor as
though we had stEi;ck u load which might point
out somethug. ahout tho truc tnwarlncss Of
vii @Woii,' said Mr. svott, "a,l you'll prove Is
tnat,, Tint so'"H fellows tried to e'ackual him md
1Ile Cur. said It was competent to show how
these losses had OCCURRED but hu thought the
examination Was going beyond the actual 1llcs-
tiun Of payments OF noncy which Mueller had
mule.
hlr. Doutcll said this grow out of Ills IN.
swrrs. ...
Mr.. swctt faid IL wasn't true. aud nobody
would pretend that Il was, that Mueller paid
anyboIy on account OF this contract
chned ed tn n1 ' Mr Hoync. "Now know kaSsIbs abosat
this, untl pronosu to have au explanation.
Tile fact is lllat for tile last two ycars Mr..
Mueller
HASN'T nEEx AnhE TO nA1sn 4 DOLLAR
10 pay myself and Nlr. SWEET. lilo has given hfa
notes, with security, for fees that haye accrued
for defending b!aclsnutl suit for nc, ,D00, which
to,.o'ssl TO ;he supsemo Gous''-a purely 'a"-
"Ycs." pnt IN Mr.. Casnphcll. "Exlllh!t this
witnl.ss' poverty to t1!e iurE.n-
sNcs, ntr," replied htr. HoYne.
Campbell, .t'at iii tbs Is mere ainmIae,--that
this poverty hos vnnae from dtsiup. We wnnt
to lind out what there was about shts IL ccnts
foot.'' =
- Ht EkhHluAtlolt WILL 'u0 cQHlHeQ," ENIn
the Court, "to payments Of money Which tie
witncss llaa ntatte, by reason Ut which lie las
been subjected to losses; anh OF course It fs
right, oil eross.cxatnfnatton, to show tiint my
body 0lso' had anibtcrcst IN this contrnck.n
"'rhc question really ts,n sull Ar. Swctt
"whetl,cr this suit shaIl be used Is d acnndal
spcicty.''
.Lr .Csmphell Intjruain tAet soaidn,t help
q I tlieFd aay tea,!al ut thu boston'' ort
NGo On, runt2c,ncn." remarked MIR. SWEET,
cncoraGillgly, " und you will get It farther"
don't ;1 ae my
70. @ Now turning to. tho wltncss) nbuut tllia
IIilbl,ard sui. Tie clutn,. you stated, was IL
cnt,ts Ii foot 1or every STONE you put iuso the
'Hfi "ito i'lnt Claim 1t first lmset. Tho jour-
T.. Waltz Interrupted Mr.. Boutcll. "Anawcr
my tucstion md nothing else. Did IIIbbnrl
cla!u.! to llaye any fntcrest iii this contrart"'
tNo Bir.a
allow. then, did llo claim to Do entitled to IS
to you in obtatnll'g 'hc ontractW
"No, ar, lie hadn'. rendered any services"
.n Wns IL simply what Mr. Hnyne aill Alr.
SFctt stAtt,-
4 runE n1.AcHMAu. opERATsoNl"
uYcs, Tint wns ~
uTos.' II ntldch ar. lIoYne, TIT waa suit for
s5o,WU, il wns defcated aud tho parties col,,-
'ntnred ,,snotacr III Cincinnati "h':'' Is now
'e, slr. Soutcl1 asIscl on w',at ground, stating
law potot wonld hs more satisfactory n'an tl'at
~ Mr. IT, .t Iioynu proceeded to explain thnt the
duckuIatesa III tho lower court got "snap"
Judgment, n,ai Tint tho snpromo Cnnrt 70.
Yrrse. the decision, on tl!s gro1.nd ~. ttat thu
'"Tian yun tilllts't liylda with Mr.. 1lfhhas11"
asked Mir. noutull, turning to tue witness.
"No. tir."