, 1879-02-08

"pSc NV ns,,;moi vcti,J,n Ts. ",eyn. W. or,so
City Insurance Comnanyi''
TYc., sir,N
,.t1nw ro,,1t7 thar r,ptro, mr.
ulYclI. thcy cnt,f1 mi rontro3 A.. .s n mntter
NJ oonrsc IL .t.i. ,,.r nnma t., ,nn-t i""s 81
thought It mtant be en- mn,ier % their con.roi; int
IA, tl,nt It ntrht Ge ronlrocd according to thcIr
x}sl,st. and l'n 5I.mtssr,ln
HWhat did vn,, ,,n'trr,t,nh va, The nu,oo.o
=, f,,,n~ ,l,at op,a'nai nc,s,ioo; ~ nrc,, In
Mycs:' N In, t,,,i"ncnt* coull MT bc nh
taiued against It in ti.c stato courts, nlul It
should not bc nut Into Receiver i.a,nis there.
rrocecdlngs wore pending against II tn the State
courts"
'.Bcardstcy wns tho rcat party that you were
asking to intervene uponlt'
F" Yes, eir; at least he was in the Herman
Brown cfaim.'
"Who owned tic Newton l. DyArlsley claim,
upou which The original petltiun VIA t,leLl"
n don't know,n -.
troll iti' ~' w. s''''~ >"~ ~e'''
ii didn't know hut what the petltloniug
creditors in that rnse might At tho request or
wish Of tho Company .II.u,lss thc procceslIngs.''
creditors a a,,.l % NEWTON the t othcrl, tt 3' ''''N
"Yrs, eIr.''
"Coulttn't he hare consentcd to The dismissal
Of this other claim Just rs well as the original
pan!i"
"fIis firm had placed TINT c1ain In the hands
Of atnith Who was tlcir solicitor, and by whum
the orginnl petition was tiletlt mud smith was
the attorucy Of ltnfnca, Their ct4im was
small one 'rhe Herman Brown claim waa n
larger ono. Since my attention tas been called
10 II, i think 70 had nno.laer reason. We de-
sired to have a stAnding Ia court i any Pro-
"Who leairei1 to hayo stanulng in COURT"
" "Bcardstcy i!ii."
uOn the ortoluul pciitouln
nYcsn
!. wc,,. Il ,ccmea To me that t,fr. pcan,,1cr.
o,,ho,tri te VIVA n nen,brr of The lrm lint fifcd
Tia 1rsl nctttpu dflu't consider that he had a
tnrc.,rI in theso ciau.a which eha hai bought
.,: 't,,.y atuounsctl L, some $1,000 Or iii .oD
ar,3 lila Newton q Dcsr,lsIey claim vas auali
.,nnit spcmS IN mn nf o,lr f.fDls'
onsV'f 3vhv % cnu,slnt ho hayc come in in mn ,ndl
vlaual q capacity without putting yon IN between
a' =; nNothing.S nsis"SS A' - ''''@' anu
- lie Cuu|tl hare had lust a. good standing in
coas! va ~ .i.S'su sir, 'o0 - '' &''''S'''
"rl!en why was tho assignment made to yoa,''
VIZ ftnr u somo hest,tatlonl well, sir. don't
kptw a NJ could ctyo nny reason. iii wsutcti
me- me to tako the elalsna and collect t,em,''
lou"W,S Wa:,t II for ,,,e purpo,o Of dcce,v,np tia
cnnr. II, so,na way Or otlyrl"
eo q M" .Ir.
.1ri Tie Court over know that YOU wero not
tao .en em e,~ 'si s,o't emow that tbe Court ovcr
tncw thut filed the claim a. l,a certainly would
nnye hnl no occasion to know it unless /
askcl for leave to nle the petition; and
I can't say whether, asked such lcave
or not, the records would SLOW. I hayu neyer
e1ami1,e.i tic records. would state tllas II was
considered M advantage to uas0 different credit
epsi ors appear.'
j" Why WAS It an advahtaEef"
creditors count, md yel couIdnt say that tl.at
,sas take into consideration 10 itltug tllat claim
In nv name"
tan yu,, assign nnS other rcason1"
uNo, etr; cunft think OF Any tIt1ler."
"On TINT claim, you say, u,sro was soma so
ner cent paldln
Yes, eir.n 49,.
aTo whum did TINT gof"
mr scrylrey.h
YOU deducted your fees cut OF the amount
4'ss; Yes. sr,n
Now. what was tie $1,000 paid to you for}',
!" Fur services rendered. alter tl,at.''
via vi,oulI"
"To- lsttcr some hcsitattonl should say
tn the Garden Guy Insurance Company, strictly
f',ndswn '''~
4 What sort OF sorylccs-aa sttorpcyfn
uNot nitoRotncr as attoruey,-as attorney
and an agent ID bllyinR clnl,ns.''
w II Whnt scrytcrs a. attorney had mi, rentjnrptl
for ,iymf'' M '~>' 'sN
fa1l taken Two cases to tic Hunrems
Court"
M1n tht. mattrr}n
" ~. - .,tx.n in,rr,.,.1 l., ". a,.,o ,.,,,,,,
1rn,,a sm nri ~ ~. nu s'd,u . Guu.s
aa,"re% ~ IT, t,v acfnnts y ' ''
fc,.'steu ft.r y r.; 'i,,o,,or n, norrrn,,,,u
"Yes, s,i sir." ''''S' '&''A'"p'~''
III. sa"~ vi ama ho fuu rasa T. lon'lu ~. snn 1or al
tHe hSlsNIs .nA ~. ,ss leu " t'8 Co"p'si5i