, 1879-01-31

THE CHICAGO TRIBUN
eanc time lie would GO an,t nee Mr. Cooll,auRh
1r some onc on whose honesty A. to this matter
m . barker l,e had confidence. Witness went
to tho Judge in tho afternoon, and the Judge
t,o dnnc for The creditors to accept the offer OF
o. 0tM anIl cuntfrm the hAlc, md he entered the
order Wttncss thorgl't he presented his report
nn thc 1'tts1 Of Aprtl. 1874, and the final order
Judge mu.lu the n't,norandun on the back. be
Instantly tonk It ever and delivered 1t fo A1r.
Cnpp, the minute or record clerk. On the 10Th Of
April he went to tho Judge and asked whether
snnats T. n'.l close 10 The estate. Witness
thought !io the JudKc tod him 70 como again in
took ttr report Of the tgth Of April after the
tndorsrmcnt Into the Clc.k's oftIce.
What etvch rot, tint t.nprcsslonl
Bccauto lie Judge read It through. There
trE tt,-atuF shoutd judge that be did 30 from
tl:e vary fact TINT TINT ~Asstte usual course In
nct'ons had treated such matters. When my
first report was made TO him. and he entered
" order directing me to o:lcr sl'r stock At
pirate e. ~ sa!e, ! d'i not apl'roach the Judge.
impression Is that the papers were left with the
Judge !n that case: but as 10 this rspurt,-the
report to which these papers wcrc attache1,-I
,tc. .,s..if y s''a' sooA 'at INTO toe eefks
HWhyi''
"rroin tho fact TINT the .JutRc read II over,
mn! think can positively awear that after no
nu .I' ehasn1oco ani cntefea hls Endorsement gu
Cnn,1.,' " '"' Pape'' 'o"N " o'eF u ''s'
III. Kuott-rhat vas On tho ,norniur ot The
16tht
."fea. str:" ..-.-..-
,,, ~. Mon,y-of afternoon you don't reme-
UT + Mn.vn' ,,as
no.Iti,c IVY ~ "ssc oeeo III tnc aitef"ooni mi not
=, Mr. Cooper-phl 1ou take IT. to the Clerk, md
i,,,,r. t,fa',.., 'eo' oe'o1e you LOOK IL 'nto
'".9g ,b,n, n!1o.et1. .'n. !.
"Why :rs"n Il, nv': %nn ,ht,k nott.t
- .,, ,itc marx on ti,at paper wouldn't amount
~ 'xn '"E osors ny LouTt naa e1anitnea u.
1 +. VIZ ntsGessaly 20 nave u pass thronEn The
nn.,,,.!, W c eons. Geioee Tue ClefK would haTe
y "stWv'E VIM " " M!tu ~.
ro,,a uu "ere So'nG 10 HE IL aayno6,-that was
5u"t sue.oI,!t W >.
sft,r H.. W., rs ~, konE 70 n'n H. out only
~itsf LIE eou't naa examined H.
.-
NOTIFYING CREDITORS.
"Ths order reade, Enter order TINT uoto
aMl securities be sold for $5OD0. un,rss oh.
tectlons arc filed py Mopday morning, II. ". H.,
wa not FequIrcu' believe, to send out
Witness stated that he took The Lx1y, H,,I}.t,n.
hui ho Ind rc+,, vim kcnt tr,e,. of ,,,o =, ~,
~. ~ ~ es1a "uo hcp' tfaes oi tle cases
s"a lou am aooRs Neni eoa1etimes he did not
sec tic HnGftin tor week. lie could not ray
whether tie VAS or WAS not in the hAblt uf read
Ing It every morning when he came 10 fhc of]lrr
- tS..,. .s sao W s"o os.1
Moepsuae" '.Se uIon ne'te"'nht3nees "he1ler
10 eofseu|tca ille newspapers 10 relation totnw
proceedings. fte Tas at TINT time burt]ehed
with tabor. lie Ind hin avn nrnct,rc IN inland
10. tlls Gcrlnu11ia ,nattcr n,,l nthcr In.
nnrtant matters. that conntsntIv reo,,ir.d his
attention.
nWilat kind of obtcetfons rori1 h. f1.A hv
morning nuxtp In what manner could credIt-
ors know aboat this matter unless you gave
ttetn s9,ne not!eSt ,..-- &,
,, H., Ir tnS nog o. anssc papeIs a1stl
thc worltll How should =" "'~' -
~ um nut speaking about constructive notice.
What good. would conatructtvt notice do those
tFEllkuEa WHO HHIIEQ 10 QDlEC[s IL HEY didn't