, 1879-05-15
An Admission Made to Him by Prua.
sing About tho Attic Story.
Tho Two Reports 10 Which tho Witness
Put Ills Signature.
Young Holman Satisfies The Court that Ho
Is Competent Witness.
IN Examination on tho sahittt Of Petrol.nu,
Stains and Iron Knots.
Half tho Stone In the Building Should
Not HIVE Been Passed.


n, ,l,c oneu,nr of Tho eighth dnY'e urococa.
.,,-. T., N. f.,.,ou,-1 -11o,sn cotca beforo ,Eut1fc
nnor IN lin t7n,tr1 stntcs DIstrict t,ot,rt. yns-
,sr,,av ,nnrn,ur. thc Court oyest1,,cu thc dc. |
fcr,,,s t,h;octtnr nt .1p f,nv hefnre In the ,n-
tro1,,,1nn ri ,1,r rktt,nato Of NIca.ra. Doytnr-
Inn. I;a,.trom. ClcayeIa,,d, Van Us{lc,, and |
,,thors an IN ,hr rost of ths ohlnneyA. rrns,
+.tr,. and decided that tho evidence WIS com |
,,ntrnt
Mr. s,vnft raumcfl hts
cuoss.rxAM,sAr,os or uu, por1yoros,
,vbo, In rrs,,ouau 10 questions from the astutc |
counsel, eait the stone In the building wns not
~ .ia ce, o,,o,ttr when mt In, n,ul IT hal bcen
o,o,rin, wt,rsc eyrr sit1ce Bucna Vista stonc
would do we'll enough above the basement OF
.nrh hu,,Iur. hut tho trouble Ii, this cnsc hc-
,ow t,c basement was tint It was u moor quality
of Hucna Vista. owing to bad selection and tile
fart that ,),c stone itself was improperly pnced
Defects IN Bucna Vista stone could be cured II
thr stonc was nrourrly dried and II, further.
tho ,,ouo una voo,i for anyth,uu in Tim grst
niocc
Mr.. SWEET showed the Witness Bomc moro
n,,otos al the bu,ldt1g, tukcu In 1871 and 1876,
ami was nrocccdln.. 10 outz him Thereon, ws,c,,
Ar. Camnhell. rcta]ntiut upon the gentlemen
~, .,,o .,iur .fdc for thcr ob1rrtton tn tha IN.
Oh .ue os'el s"'s ~ ., .1s .',s,,,sa. ,,,o 'a ~
foro ro,nnrkc,1 Tint hc fswettl lind better offor
49,, ~ aviI0u,a hofore In ahowrt1 thrm m ,he
t,rn @ y ~ Swat iii otfrr item ond then Mr.
Can, Campbell objrctcd. inti1untiug that saueo for
tic prosecution waB sa,lce fur thc defense. In
other words, tho acfcust could tnyo tle pleas
rro OF running usouud town after the photogrn-
Gny Gayfs seso'e &c 'e 'SSN '' % 40 S
Something Of a wranslo grew out OF all
this. but # was finally patched up mud ce-
ncntel lnlo al agreement letting in all tue
sides. .-.........
Mr.. swutt resumed tho cross-examinat!on.
and ,ba ,vtp mrs. said In, Ind examined that mr.
linn linn o t ,he building shown In tie pictures as
we'll as the stone III tue yard also represented
therein. In the majority report IL was stated
tint hut yzry ltstlc bad stone was contained in
the buis' rs tat as ''s Soa'.,ssu ., III. "a'. *
nM!ned' III hs ps1Sa.e sepo'' III" "'t"es' ~
uYou pLEw HOT AND coin
.,,,, =. 4ho ann. tImr an rou3n ua,,c1 Mr..
-" s.,'' "' Wv 9@'N. '
s"ctt. -,.,.,-
| "Ye5 did" replleu tIe "1thcs8, "Hha eune'
Mr., surtt asked Mr.. Boyll.gton If he had
stated In thnt Individual report t'at half Of tho
S'u W. 1,,ss r.niicI tsmt In ilt1n,, renebcr
nracises, int la satd. hut in stlGstuncc It was
nseSS M , Wa. sno IL, vSrv 1Itt,c - or nntt IN favor
AZ eI'"i Inc au stone. t ''' wy ''' - 's' So "'o'
nhe fSp1Fi ' sSl @ "as ns ss ,n; .Su1' t ": o NJ. ~"
s"Stt asns" @ t3 IT,, tnI T.. T.
pot aliks Tie witness explaiusd lint ouc was
is ~. avn md thc otllcr tic inlur nf lie Com.
n,iss;",, If ,yhtcl, ho VIVA ilri1,fier. md .,n
jisn't seu inviting Inconsistent in them, Doth
nrryed @ as tt,u M sans sans concsfon, iho build
,E - fr;, n n" o,hrr ",nnrs n thr Enn.
,atasio,. IN, !nttnr stntcd that the Ind stnnn
.a1ss'oM ss ,,,,ar,ttrcir fe,x wr hn basi .Iot"
MeI. Sot ' 4'"s t;t w"ro had nns u Wr Sws,t
. ~ ~ p.t H. croct .tiffcrcnce hc.
Masa ~ ~ ts, thmrs n rnuld mnsahy In + M
awse @ als ,.hn~ u"n IT, ~ ffnn!',trr1 I'm rcn' no
WI , 10 hn ,uo,c ,hia sat.ini renGrt wns lint
In ,p"s IN ntnt M tn tje u1,arry bcipt. sufficient
~ ~ .nn,iy rnn,,~h fropl Stonp to cxecuto 1he
contract ,,,,i nut up the bntIlIine. This WIS one
Of thu questions to hu examined In reporting ns
| to whutber tt,a building should 20 on or be tori
! s,nwn.
! A. s,rott dl1n,t rec what the witness, in.