The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1879-12-26
TIE COURTS.
aupremo Court Doeiaiona.

IN AimHHu, 4 - he verdict mud lulE
mont IN - criminal c1in' viii not he tli@t1th"e
on an1nhI. when tbs tfhhafItpt contains ~
| I'LL ~ "T@sJ'tfnn IT aaaiEnmsHt 81 eIroiH.
No 3G3y Gt.Cf,Iss..I,,& 81. i. H. IN, I.0f4EI6&I,
| -. lt,. y ~ ft,
r,, H. b,,,,i ,,,.t.,,t,, -, tnn"
,,,d ~. ia. I'll tl ~ ~ ,,.,.,t, A.
49,, '''' ~ ~ -" ~ w
i ,,Ll,i',,l,, 80 fn,,t ~ a. l'a =.
tt ~ w '''ta''e''' ~ W. ~ W.
All hulrancr policy mon the lff,, or tha hu4
bind FOR In, wift14 brn,,lfi Il. ''propertv" I'm
the tanEt> Of ltirlN 32a2C q unI II IN r,nlnl
hlo14 ~ amount nlnii'" lbntd l0lh3I, h"t owner
hip 81 ttlld sun viii rFlnlN hart H. tbs day 81
h"t 1Hihul denth, mltt "a" rnn tlnti moth
liR iron l'r hli,1anl HNWCGrfAGn.
II th"R"l@ property III tho widow rnnsHta
In an innlnmra policy upon the iiia of her
hut iahd, pnYment nf which Il let iHtcti - tllt
| ttua o. rh'' will hr entitled, nH hiHg hi ne
rrfEsiIpi4 circumstances, to hHNr hi rIninl
tpt sl9pJ Ilne"1 upon the account titcd tg this
administrator, pending hel suit upon the
policy, and ~ iln lnid that Sum by nduin
bltalei. biSFPt'Hl aAN FiEN h"tii ef 9' hrt
,, r ~ =, 5,i
tI,o InFu,n,,,,, ,,.,,f,,,,f@ ''''''''' '''''''
| ,
/ ~ '~'H iitAiI ~. 4 I"af@ lttli ~ hl&,
i In Wor. Il Under &, 6. 24eG and IN the nh
| Hnurn Of u tlpuntlon 10 the contrary, tho ok
l1rn1,'H II y Ril" me 10 he hntnc ~ tho pun
cnt,cf md thmn"xpenaee include MOI only
the ncl pf f1tlo. bat wElntt,vnr Incidental *
/ pelRcl may i" ucenHnr To- pcif,rt tis III le
/ The purchaser cannot recover from Tho
vendors the Valuo or tile thing purchased md
/ which was destroyed Will" tn their postF,,a
| ai'n. If Il" have not hIm"lf compli"d with tho
| uhlRttitrIa IF therontrtt nnd have nut them
| In drfAtIt fnr failure on thrit palt ~ DO 80
Though tho ventl"iH bo ittletnuIt tor fnlIIng
| To rpnp"to tn" sale ard deliver pose"Rnion
They art not liable foi the value of tho props
Si'y NHl,in y 9't't9y9d Wh'l@ flitl ~ lh'lf
minus, 7 y t,' shown I'M, ~" 3"Eif"eil"i "n-
r,nn,,rtr, l,ih .,,II -, s"3 - - ,,
,n,iai -, ,i I,,,, Nd So i.,,
~ - " ''''
-. -" 1HAs' - s'@ \ ~ EAIl7ll T. -
t3s t'AisaI@itlE'
IN Dfishnc. = An net III pledge. under
plivntn signature Or movable effects need
net iceit" theti delivery ~ the pIedpm, ihe
fact thnt Tiny Wtln Delivered Ia AND hed hv
him nlny be established by testimonial proof.
The prlltcAe Of III" pl,pif!'o upon the niti-
eIee affected byih" contract doW mot prevent
their b"lilR HeI2ed and sold by other creditors
ot lii" IIoit:or
No 1885 MARTHA a. arAEa W. ". X. MACON.
EEIrfs nor
raj MN. rt,...,,,,,,o.5tt,,,, H.,
to,y ~, l., ,.,,,,',, H., ~, ~
.,,,,,,.',,,,tI,.,, ,,4li r ,,,.,# ,,I.I.l= I
.,,',,,,,,tv ,n.iii,t,,,,i Nv t,,n tnt,ta, ,,lh
,,,,.,5etian nfl,,l,d ~, ,,,,,,t h,s,t. 1,,,,
In no way alI,.rt4, the Validity 81 the will
II Il not necessary Ier the notary Ill exe-
cutting II nurirupltivo will IT, IIac tn eyirt
lanRtAEsef the testator, IT eufli&eH If words
convoy NIX the sam" meaning b" employed
ne lntt tlthl Whlln tue notary Wa8 writing
the Will lhtl"f Inc t'efht"t@ dtcthtton. "1rh
h'ih"nre"l which Wo no ~ f'Fth ny the former
~ soon af WI ltlotl, hlhl II new "m thrii flltt-
tatsd, Va" tHitt"f eonVtlsnd with one 81 tbs
WIlnnk9eA, y moi HHeh m interruption a9 will
vltlnt" tn" testament
No 7l4i NEW pHIEtNft AND t,AUppI4rToN