, 1879-02-13

Mann-on account SlG9.93 Bradshaw ,&
lnman, htryS for plaintiff.
No. lS9-Anuie Copeland VS. Geo. Cope
land-diyorce. Bradshaw & Inman. Attys
for plaintiff; G NJ. HalIer, for defendant.
No, l9l-E. RamaS vs. Geo. Cooper
-promiSsory note, $3.50. Bradshaw &
Inman, Attys for plaintiff.
No. l02--M. II. Lundbla1 VS. John
Swan. Il. VI. HaIlcr, Atty for plaintiff,
No. l93-.T. ii. JelIett vs. A. T. Learned
OH account. G. NJ. Haller, Atty tor
PLAINTIFF
No. l94-Catherine Strange VS. Jas.
Simms and Mary j. Simms-damages for
burning barn, $1,000. G. NJ. Haller, at
torney for plaintiff.
No. 195-H. A. Webster VS. w. Crooks
damages for possession of tenemcnt,.
G.. NJ. iaIler, attorney for plaintiff.
No. 1866. o. Ilaler VS. Peter Me-
Laughlin and Michael McNamara--proAl-
issory note, $4l7. G. NJ. Ilaller, attor-
ney tor plaintiff
No. 1876. o. Haller vs VIM. ii. Gill
liam-promissery note. $l77.5S. G.. NJ.
Haler. attorney for plaintiff.
No. 19S-LoUis Jordan vs. G.. ID. Camp
bell--on acconui. G.. NJ. Ha!ler, attorney
for plaintiff.
No. 1875. N1terman & s. katz vs
L. Blockingtau 4ud j, L. Davis-prom-
issory note, 4l23 e. NJ. Haller, attorney
for plaintiff,
No. 200--Cha> jIcKay VS. Robt. Doug
las. Bradshaw IS lnman, attorneys for
plaintiff.
No. 20l-R. A. Swain and S. A. Jes-
senten VS. A. +. Learned.-on account.
Sls5G9. G N lIaller, attorney Tor plain
tiff.
No. 202-J. Il. Wheat vs. C. Mckay
and J. Archqnebault-note, s67; do. $50.
G. NJ. Haler, attorney for plaintiff.
No. 203-T Phillips VS. z Mclaughlin
and NJ McNamara-on account, s627.2G.
HaIler & Engle, attorneys for plaintiff.
No. 900. IA Miller VS. P Naidenteldt
-promissory note, $3.50, W Ii White,
attorney for plaintiff
No. 20G. j A Miller va L A Loveng.
w III White, attorney tor plaintiff.
No. 2O7. Wm I Sayward vs Geo. w
Harris, executor Of the will OF A Phin-
ney, dec-damages for cutting timber on
lands of plaintiff, $l0S,O00. II. l..
Blanchard, attorney for plaintiff.
No. 20S VIM 7 Sayward vs. Jas Phm.
ney-damages claimed for cutting timber
ON lands Of plaintiff. ii l. Blanchard,
attorney for plaintiff.
No. 200. } Katz vs II Quinlan-on
account. $34563. ssHaIIer, atty for
plaintiff.
No. 2l0. Katz vs. Fl Quinlan-fore-
closure of chattel mortgage, S454.2s. G
NJ Haler, atty for plaintiff.
No. 2ll. S Hancock Va q Tattzen and
f Groham-iolnt promissory note, s5j4.
G M Haller, atty tor plaintiff.
No. 2l2. VIM. I. Sayward VS. Geo. W.
Harris, executor estate OF Arthur Phin-
ney, dec-S2. .99G claimed as damages for
personal property appropriated by dec.
II. l.. Blanchard, atty for plaintitt.
No. 2l3. X. I. Carroll VS. VIM. Sea-
vey-on account, $0l5. ID. W. Smith,
atty for plaintiff.
No. 2l4. S. d. Howe vs. ]. i. II. Van
BOkkelen-promiSory note, $3.50. G. NJ.
Haller, atty for plaintiff.
No. 2l5. Robt. Douglas, appellant, VS.
Commissioners of San Juan Coin the
matter OF laying out road. G. NJ. Hal
Ter, atty for plaintiff.
No. 216. r. Madden, appellant, va
Commissioners OF San Juan Coin the
matter of laying out road. G.. NJ. Hal
Ter, atty for plaintiff.
No. 2l7. p. Rugen. appellant Va Com
missioners Of San Juan county-In the
matter Of laying out road. G.. NJ. Hal
Ter, atty for plaintiff.
No. 2lS. p. Z. Peterson. appellant vs.
Commissioners OF San Juan county--In
the matter Of laying ont road. G.. NJ.
Haller, atty Tor plaintif.
No. 2l9. NJ. X. LundbIad, appellant,
VS. Commissioners Of san Juan county
In the matter Of laying out road. G.
NJ. Haller, atty for plaintiff.
No. 290. VIM. Cram vs. II. e. Morgan.
administrator OF the estate OF Mary +.
Hunt, dec-wages for labor performed,
Bradshaw and Inman attys for plaintiff.
WHY, YERILYI