National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-11

Dennisor; judgment below affirmed. Hoyener vs..
Dockendorf hearing commenced.
CIRuufr CoURr No i-JUsTIcE WYLIE.-Strong
VS.. District Of oolumbis trial progressing.
Sherman vs.. Boston verdict for plaintiff for slSt
and costs. French VS.. MCPHERSON ct al; verdict
for plaintiff for s2Oe with interest and costs Trum-
bro VI, Walter. ganishee; Indignant of condemna-
ton. Meyers VS.. Martin; order for commission To
issue TO the clerk of the Circuit court OF Franklin
county, Miss, TO take the deposition OF James M:
Wilmington. = Reside agent, w. Lucas; verdict
for plaintiff for 500 and costs. Douglass vs. Bos-
ton; appearance of absent defendant ordered.
Wheeler VS.. johnson jury out Commercial Bank
of Wheeling w. Va vs.. Benedict ct al; on trial.
koUnY CoURT-JUsTIcE MAoARTHuR.-- Brere-
ton vs.. Brereton; sale ordered and X. W. Tyler APP
pointed trustee. Baltimore Equitable Society vs..
Grant ct al; demurrer sustained and twenty days
allowed complainant to amend Gillct ct al. vs..
Glllet Ct al; reference 10 auditor Barbour ct al.
VS.. Naylor ct al petition OF Samuel Barth to be
made party complainant. McCarty VS.. McCarty;
rule issued rcturnable on Saturday next. Elem
as H pyen sg,b 5eissrea 10 Plant 70 sEo
given TO withdraw certain exhibits from the files.
Richards VS.. Mnckall exceptions 10 SPECIAL audi
order of publication. Norris vs.. HALL demurrer
overruled: leave 10 amend In twenty days Davis
vs. Huyck; hearing commenced.
CRIMINAL CoURr : JUsrIcE HAGNER. john
Beckett, indicted for the murder of Rosalie Ellen
Harris; the counsel for the defense presented good
causes for not proceeding to trial and the hearing
was indefinitely postponed. George Holmes burg
larry OF the house of summers /. Kimbell in octo-
ber 1878, aud larceny of quantity of silyerwarc;
guilty Zachariah Baior aud Mile Bailor, arson;
on trial.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TO-DAY.
SUPREME COURT or THE DrsTRICr-CHIEF-JusTIcH
CARTIER AND JusrICt JAMEs-No. 1853, Hevenor VS..
United States VS. Perkins; 80 Cochran VS.. Clarke:
Jog. Alexander VS.. District of Columbia: 15I, Ma
tional Bank OF Harrisburg VS.. Collins: 1853. Wash
ingtoh Brick Machine Company VS.. Griffin; 1852.
Connolly W.. Laurence; &c., United States vs.. J. AZ.
W. Stone: l6l, Strong VS. Patent Office. d
CtRcUIT COURT No. l-JusTIoE wYLrR-Eo. lo0,
Wood & Go. VS.. Gruhami.e & Trinidad Asphalt Paw.
Ing Company; III, Adams vs.. District of Columbia
10 Shehan Reilly; 300 Spaids VS.. Cooley; 297.
Wolf Curtis VS.. Augensteini Sol. Lynch ct ux vs..
District OF Columbia; ST. Makely Cottrell Bros;
35l Matthews, administering, VS.. Baldwin CT al;
S5s, London & Manchester Plate-Glass Company,
limited, VS.. Holmes 375, Chaplne VS.: Taylor; 39l,
Wood VS.. Darlington Ell al; 423 Poiknhorn VS.. Dyer
OF all i27, Parker VS.. McChesney: AIS, Wall Rob
inson 4S9, Kennebec Ice Company vs.. Inland x
SeSsad SSSShbg COMPANY a. Men w. Cor
lij Seal VS.. Nalor; i47 United States vs. NATION
Of al. 4io. Lanahnn vs.. Young e AL ~. smith 4
Drip w. Brown; 457, Seldner & Son vs. Bicber ct
al; Ass, Holmes vs. Kirk 4G7 Basshor & Co. VS..
| Hill; AGO, Stanton VS.. Wroe. H
Circuit G 6.,ro No 2 os coHNo
Co VS.; Benedict ct al: 49,, Draper VS.. Alexander
! 1SG, Hutchinson vs.. Alexander PIG, Bridget VS..
foos VS. Sh sIo So Ross Ts
| ct nj; 80, Desmond VS.. Baltimore 4 Potomac
| Railroad Company; go, Washington Market Com
Shea VS.. smith, smith, 20 Van Riswic lex, VS.. HamlhG
ga Shea VS.. Smith; 266, Rupprecht Co. vs.. Worch
2eS. Cahill vs.. Wilmer etal; go Ryan VS.. Dorsey.
Campbell vs. Kennedy 29lE, Botsler vs. Langley
| 30 Bowen vs.. r. S. T. Co.; u. Webster vs.. Stew
art; ~, oTwombly VS.. Randall; 49, Bryan VS.; Ed
gum; 10, nose vs.. CARROLL 81, Shaw vs. Basse ii
CRDusAL CouRr - JusrfCE HAGNER. Edgar
Mckinney, Albert Jones, Battle Keys and Benjamin