Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1879-03-25

/ Ouuutl
Resolrcd, That this Bar take great pleas
ure In expressing their high appreciation
of the admirable qualifications of the Hon
Joseph W. SymondS Is a HiSi priWS Judge
Patient and judiciouS in all his duties; his
clear. unparalleled presentation OF ques
lions 10 the jury, ensure eminence an,
great usefulness upon the Bench.
Ordered, That the Secretary enter upoI
the Bar record the above resolution.
Below we give the list Of jurors, arc
record of Court doings for the week.
GRAND JURY,
Albany, Amos G. Bean.
Andoyer, VIM. II. Hardin.
Bethel, Elias g. Bartlett, Foreman.
Brownfeld, VIM. L. Swan.
Buckfeld, David l.. Farrar.
Canton, Charles +. Moul,on.
Dixfeld, Daniel Tucker.
Frycburg, Samuel o, Wiley.
Greenwood, Jacob T. Curtis.
Lowell, Joseph F. Steams.
Norway, Ira johnson, jr.
Oxford, George +. Walker.
Paris, Ira Bartlett.
Porter, Hazcn W. Hartman.
Rumtord, John H. Barker.
Sumner, Elias A Tucker,
Waterford, David z. Bisbee.
Woodstock, u. A. Whitman.
FIRST PANEL.
Canton, Simon NJ. Coolidge.
Grafton, Geo. NJ. Brown.
Greenwood, ID. W. Cole.
Mexico, Hosea Austin, Foreman.
Norway, Chas. b. Cummings.
Oxford, VIM. +. Caldwell
Paris, Horatio Bradford.
Paris, Edmund Curtis.
Porter, Daniel Brooks.
Rumiord, John +. Elliott
Waterford, John y. Baker
Woodstock, Gpenlcaf G, Dow.
SECOND PANEL.
Andoyer, Stephen W. Richards
Bethel. s.. John Hastings.
Brownfcld, James X. Hill.
Buckfcld, y. T. Shaw.
DiNfcld, Enos 7. Gould.
Frycburg, Frank Locke.
Gilcad. Samuel W. Potter.
Hebron, Ezekiel Merrill.
Hiram, Scammou Hill.
Norway, Aloazo j. Ncvcrs.
Peru Amos l. Harlow.
Summer. John H. Robinson
SUPERNUNERARIEs.
Bethel, Enoch W. Woodbury..
Byron, \. 5. Young.
Hartford, Isaac +. Richardson.
No.lp. VIM. y Daniels " John Buck
This was an ACTON on uotc given by BucI
10 John Bennett. amounting 10 sl9O. D.
Tense set forth that Bennett had boarde,
out the fuli amount OF note. TN The o,he
hand. Bennett claimed that he did chore,
for his board, and never authorized it t,
/ Doe applied 70 the note. Verdict for plain
III Sl6.S2.
Black. Swa>cy.
No. l5l.-Otls Hayforl " Francis b
smith Action on account annexed 70
about $1,000 worth Of wood furnished 70
the use OF the 2. o. Central K. X, OF
account OF the def. Also FOR other mon
ey> paid by pIf for and at the request @
the def Den. admits the claims of TN
PHI to the amount OF about 500, but dc
mics that hc i, liable to the pin. for tn
wood, which is charged ON PIN. books t,
the railroad corporation Verdict for pill.
sl.jSll9.
Swascy. Webb & Haskell
No l73. George 4. PlalSted vs. DAME
G. Kendall. Action on promiSsory not
FOR So, dated Jany =, 1869. Upon thi
note is an Endorsement of three dollars
dated Nov. 4, 1872, and the question il
whether the Endorsement was authorized b,
the defendant, for II II was then the note i
not outlawed; the defendant pleads IN,
statute Of limitations, saying the note l.
outlawed and claims that he never CAV,
the plaintiff any authority 10 indorsc TN,
payment on the note; that the plaintiff haC
an account against him for repairing wag
on in 1865, and that he came down 20 de
PENDANTS house and he turned him out sil
bushels of potatoes 70 square the account
and that the note was not named. This III,
plaintiff denies, and claims that he had beer
unable to get anything on the note for
long while after it was given, and finally h,
met the def. and the arrangement wa,
made to turn out some potatoes to go OF
the note, andthat he had no account at tina
time against the defendant. Verdict fo
plaintiff for sj2.lO.
Foster. Frye.
No. IA Margaret Williamson VS.. JOIN
Williamson. This is an action for cove
nant broken. The defendant formerly helC
a mortgage on the premises in question
which mortgage covered other real estate
and on the 10th day of January, 1852, con
yeyed by quit-claim these premises to plain
tif's husband; the deed was not recorded
however, till May 10, 1871; in the mean,
time the defendant assigned the mortgage
without any reservation OF the parcel quiz
claimed to this plaintiffs husband, 10 one
Newton who recorded the assignment be,
fore the quit-claim deed; and i'll whose
hands foreclosure of said mortgage, which
had been commenced by the defendant, ex-
pred, and by decision of the Supreme