The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1879-06-10

leeislatiye' exec,tive and ,,ainia1 annranriao la
tion BILL Ii being subgtit,ite for fi1a bilf he
reported the other day. After the bilI had
statement. The Bill , now read bep he said. was was
different In very few respects from the bill
reported the other day. The Drinclual feature
Of the difference between the substitute and
The bill Us originally reported consists Of an
appropriatiOn OF $15O,0OO for the payment Of
tie salaries OF storskeepers and gaileers, ne
cessitated by an increase of distilleries III
several OF the Southern States In the last few
| months. It is almost in the nature OF a def
cheney. for this years bill does not increase
a single salary, except In cases Of d few mes
senoers and laDorers. This bill re-enaets the
present law with certain additions and pmits
certain things which are unnecessarily There
aT, no politfcal restrictions In this bill. The
POLITICAL restrictions which were on the vetoed
tineent expenses Of the courts, which require
several hundred Thousand dollars embraced
In the Bill, IL was on that portion ct the
vetoed blll that the restrictive clauses were
placed. That matter will be embraced In q
supplementary bill. There was great Oh
lection to the passage Of the bill In the form
In which this was reported but 1t was done
to avoid the slow process Of going through
the regular bill OF ninety pages or more He
admitted that It was irregular, but. BY the
unanimous instruction oil the Committee on
Appropriations he would now move to sus-
pend the rules and pass the bill.
Mr.. Hawley, Of Connecticut, member OF
the Appropriation Committee, said that as
do what was done In the regular appropria-
tion bill, omitting the political sections. Tho
minority of the committee and he believed
that nearly all on the Republican side, were
opposed to che present form OF the bif. We
pronriatIon y Bill which v was SAP approved m by Con
gress, omltting tie political clauses, but, In or
der to save time. and as the government could
live under this act, they assented to It. He
doubted whether three men knew what the
dinarily described as such, In the bill. and
fharafnra fha minority ~ the COMMITTEES had
consented to it's adoption. but they did not ap-
proyeof it There wls also some independent
Of. but, as he stated, they would vote for the
bill. - 's.'e'
The n,,eation waa then mt, m susnendinr
tho ,u,a and nassing a 9Th The phI bill and op ,;g
yoce zoe vote vote the Speaker announced that In his
nY,ininn tmn.thirda had vnfad vea and da.
clarad the hili nassed -
After the result had been announced Mr..
cnx and others elaimed that thev Ind da-
mnndad a division.
The Speaker said he had waited some time
heard no nali for . division, hut as II was n.
eiatad .,1non he would recall HID daeisinY, and
sgsin n,1t Tho e oeation m iee e osoision auo
7The n,1estio11 was then n,1t. and On division
there were no in the affirmative and 26 In the
nauattva - - - : 49, - - 80
HE yeas and navs were demanded.
The fsennblcans ali rose OF, the second do
mani T'ne hili Was then raaaed Nv a vnta ~
1Ra veaa tn % navs' '0 s4 p'ss'oe = : VIZ =
Those who voted in the negative were .
Rliss If New York Cabin Of Visndnia, raId.
we'll | II Nj Kent,,ekv. 1,lark If Misao,iri iCow nf
Nav Ynr1 fSsnn 81 Arkansas EIam ~ Lon. ~
iaiana Finiev ~ Ohio Trnst af Miaanuri
Gnntar oY Arkansas Henkla III Marvland'
Hurd q Ohio glotz q P,,s,n9nsyly.ana, !. Man.
Nichols of Georpia' Rnbertaon of Ionisiana'
Slemmong 81 Arfansas, Smith Of New Jer,
sew. Oscar Turner Of Kentucky. Wbitthorne