The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1879-04-22
a "
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
Monday, April Fl, 1870.
Present: All the justices.

BY CHIEF JUSTICE MANNING.
No. 694s. In the matter OF the Mechanics
Society. Rehearing granted;
No. 1893. New Orleans Pacific Kallroas
Company VS.. Andrew I'll. Gay, tutor. heneaT
No. 55O7 Morris Ranger VS.. City Of New
Orleans Rehearing refused.
No. 55O8. Morris Ranger vs.. CITY OF New
Orleans. and the New Orleans, jackson ant
Great Northern Railroad Company. -Rehear
ing refused
lows.-Rehearing refused, :.
} No 1862, City of New Orleans vs. Metropoli
tan Loan, Savings and Pledge Bank.-.Re
hearing refused.
No. 7os1. Mrs Esther Chapman, executrix
vs. S. O. Nelson ct als-Rehearing refused.
No 7183. Mrs. Chapman, executrix, vs.. The
Citizens Bank of Louisiana. re
fused.
No. 7745. State ex rel. vs.. E. A. Burke et
Rehearing refused.
No. 734I Mrs. Louise A. Gerotfas and nus
band VS.. IhOS. IL. Handy, sheriff, ct ellie.
hearing refused.
No. 1880 Succession Of L. w. Lyons; the
minors Lyons appellants Appeal from the
Second District Court, parish OF Orleans.
i When q succession Is insolvent the heirs are
without interest to complain OF particular
acts of it's gestion, and will not, when they
have been regularly represented in the pro-
ceedings had contradictorlly with their tutor,
the administrator and the creditors be per-
Judgment affirmed.
No. 6666. State OF Louisiana VS.. Marie RI
card, appellant.-Appeal from the Parish
Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge.
/ Judgment affirmed.
No. 6667. State of Louisiana vs. Marie RI
card, appellant.-Appeal from the Parish
Court, parish OF East Baton Rouge.
/ When defendant in criminal prosecution
valves trial by jury, the judge OF the Parish
| Court Is competent to try the case.
/ JnIpmant affirmed
No 1927. State of Louisiana vs.. John L.
Gisch, ppellant.-Appeal from the Fifth
Justices Court, parish of Orleans.
Under the power TO regulate markets
hibit their establishment In particular loeali-
| ties or within given radius.
Judgment affirmed.
No. 1912. John Dawson, appellant, vs..
Eugene Boisseau.-Appeal from the Sixth
District Court, parish OF Orleans.
The action OF one member OF q dissolved
firm against his partners for balances due by
the latter is prescribed in ten years from the
dissolution OF the. partnership. The mere
signing by the parties, after the dissolution
OF the firm, of a balance sheet showing the
condition Of their affairs does not interrupt
this prescription.
Judgment affirmed
No. 1902. State of Louisiana VS.. Henry
Revells, appellant.-Appeal from the. District
Court, parish OF East Carroll.
The record OF criminal case must show
that the prisoner was arraizned and was
minutes fail IN abnev these fant tbo nen .e e
cnrreeted either at tho sa,na torn m ~ ay 70
sennent ono before ar aftor on ann"ai + Ut
this correction can only be made contradic-
torlly with the defendant.
who has nualited ne ,ru eern s ~
renew the cath no such ~ a,arr, dra r., W
during his term. 80 0'on ''' osot having
When a yenire has been set aside for vital
and yardiet arainst nr;naS.. fnd b IN
d;Sahoraad naSal MI IL ~ 90 49, ,s Wy sie
thonnh he bavanot him ,nnnad ~
aside nf the venire a'i1'oiA i1osou 'ne ees'lhs
Tnd =, s rn,.apaad 49,, .x~,a
hold Is a,,ata ~ an p1Ls9Hel oIueIeu
triai IL eo'souS W ""ai' no" iiiulo1ihent anu
NJ 7aas State ~ 1o,,a,a n-.
Smith onnaiIant Annaoi fna1aa W.. ni naIpn
1n,rt napish - IT, ppea. iioin JIG DlselicI
IIndopr 4ha stnt, ,ao ~ 20 ,o7 ~.
inrv was not drawn ~ a. lsas III .aaI
to the meetna 90 tha az o neaae my Jays pIior
nanai JIdmnant rarad ~, 70 iaSal W tne
dared held ii custody 10 Wait at - u
and trial. ''"''' 10" Anuieeaieii'
No. 1900 Succession og Ell. po+b Me-
Ennenie Marionneann onnanan+ A. a,,d mis
Ianf ~AnnaaI from tho ppuih aau apLei-
of iberytIIe WV % ioA oouA'' psiieh
The fact that there are xv;tncaseo r., a, o1a-
pranhic will does not inuaiidos W on o ~
nrive If az its oloaranh;o fa.,,. ~ ho1 ue
Tic deoiarotinss. f t III u.
that thew reeoDnize the hsnd Ire persons
as that Of the testatar and that tSa W da, mln
their knowledge that II his handw rhIy fran
having often Seen him write ri and uin irp
his lifetime are essential tn the nrnba+a "
will ~ '1e y o"A'o " e1N
Int f the nrohato ~ q will IL, =oo,.ou.
the Testimony of two nersnns . tbma da,}, anu
their knowledge IF the handwritinn 70. - is ,hse
testator is SUPPLIED. such testfmonv NAV 'i no
and strennt henad ny + inay ~ ne
ducton of original WRITINGS and thy s1idanoe
of experts by comparison ''1o o'ieoneo
Women are absolutely Incapable Of being
to testament. but they are connie,
tent witnesses to prove the hand writinn of
an the nrohata Of tasta, nan " 10 e9'apilsnea
Judgment affirmed.
Justices DaRIanc and write do,i.oo., -.
Ions dissenting from that Of the court put Int
in It's decree VIC oooi.' oo'
No. 72a5s state Of I,on,eana vs Eron1,
Byrne, appellant,-Appeal from the Diatrint
Court, parish of Bossier, 80 : 'o'
The correction of the minutes Of co,rt ao