New-York tribune., 1879-10-14

S35 80. Therefore taking the twomonths together,
this year shows loss of 81 10 per mile.
But 10 arrive no a correct conclusion ~ is neces-
sarv to remember that the month Of September
1873, was an unusually poor th for some of tho
companiA nam Il in the list. For in stance the hi
cagO and Northwestern COmpany's earnings tor Sep
teinbcr, 1879, compared WITH tine sa me- month II
1877, show decrease Of $50 per ~ D.. although
SlOi better than in 1873 Chicago. Milwaukee and
81. Paul shows llss compared wi September,
1877, Of 1865 per mile, but compared with 1873
the small gain of $40 per mile; Burlington. Cedar
Rapids aud Northern shows a loss ol ;, lOl per mile
from 1877, but gain over 1878 OF S37 Illinois
Central earned this year Sl7l per mile less than Ia
1877. bat 500 per mile more than in 1873. On Tho
contrary, Chicago and Alton shows eain over 1873
of - II per nllc, and over 1877 II SIS per mile;
Missouri. Kansas and Texas gained ~.,1 per milo
over 81 and ~ over 1915 and -. Louis. Iron
Mountain and southern gained ~ per mi" over
1S77 and S2J9 over 1875. For the nine months
ended September 30 the gross earnings ~ the six
teen roa Is tins year show tOfal increase ot
- ,;23 sol over the earning. ~ the nine mopth--f
1878. Without data for aScertainiuW fhe AVERAGE
number of miles operated each nine months " ~
impossible arrive at the correct earnings per mie,
bui an approximate estimate shows that collrc-
lively the sixteen roads lost about ~lfD per milo
for fhc nino mont hs Of this ycar. comp red with
those of 1875 1h- fact implies LARGE losses for
some of the roads because of the gains per mile ot
others
The stock market to-lay suffered % -haking-up,
ana the heW'~' c'"p Z" sp' culdl"l' W n @ ."N'n ~.
Sn'pil'o u" ''lli IVA, @ Ni.i"u' ,,. "l,. ~, ~, : ~
'i",' p'''N '"!'' ~ F''N - ''' ~ ~ " -,,,.it - FL
r' l. I'i'''N '"'tdf = '''l', ~ ...'t 9 -
l"' "s I'i"I. W N'.'' W. H. E % '.' ~, th tbr,o
i' cog '''i' li'' WV ''i ~ -, - nao .t. .p,,,,5
'i'l 'A r14 l''l - t'" som ''''v'' '''' ~ 3
s."'k' i.' hi',. ops i'u s'iy"-' ~ .ir .ir" - & ~
l' MS H-"I9' '"' "Iu'', 10y .
,''i 81 Ni.'Ir rt'ip"N'i'" W. % ,, .,oo
hr,ah to 81 lri' ipr 'o liI- "'-' 'l-,P~v
aihi",l AGA ln' ire suVpF 4" -l'-'' To. "'."'D
i' 'nI'l % r,'n'l 0'"L "'', ii"'. ~ "
" '.'i'' "." t'' '''."' i.'.f' , "
"i''- 70 i'iii'. i" a. li.'' - '' '' '.' -
~ e. . W. y il" OUT -p i.', i-' ~ . ,Io,r
t''.''"' ''i'l'- ""i el. s,.,,,.,-I ,.
''i' NV 'ii'L i" y 81 ~ -
H5u'uH' w. ."', '.I- ~ "..t it'i 80
rf.-Il'" 10 d. lH' pi'i'ii t' ' D., ti' ..I"
bi,s0 '1. axe 'lut "',i' Ut ~. .,H ~ ~ y
rallied 20 '''S l'l lhrh nI'lIN p. 'f'2' l'''''i
iun per g., Nl'Wn ihr is. Nll-'' .l'l.'.s VT
bt-in ~. Ml h'4tH l'NiIt N''' i' 4,'" -
fo 500, t'u io ~t"S .i" 80.
tanrea NoHi1rr Na,"l"lr "p ''' '' ii I'D = i"'"
to 1i2. then declined 3" t1 Hu" -''i ' ''i' p-
ng one - lir rN'rh' ''''i -'''h- lh 'il- " -'.N
iOr the daN. lh" GRANGER. ai' p -N 'Nii- li''-
ulnal advance ln Doe lir-i rrtIih were rs I'N'I
I-h and weak as fc rrnl.ldrroi oi thr ll>l. North'
west common declined ga Hin Ir'tri'l ~
UrrtcU' sock declined I"i; ~ 'nI l'.i. .en 3 hhH
recovered g. fHi tle preferred Stock i'll l'7 ger
cent. BIi Lgl,I. Cedar kdr.- ana N'itucii de-
med per erI. 90 N3. put tA'c. -", -. fhul anu
Minneapolis wa. - hignrr af +G.
Ilc >olihwrs. ,ru 1851 was rrfHiiY lowers hoi'
ably SD II nhjn" ana =. ''pN Flrl'i l''.' VIII