National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-10-30


SUPREME COURT OF THE DIsrRIcr--CHiEF JUSTICE
CARTIER AND JUSTICE JAMEs.-Hofman VS.. Jones;
argued and submitted. On calling the remaining
cases on the assignment II was found that the Chief
Justice had sat In the hearing in the court below,
and was therefore incompetent to pass upon them
In review.
CIRCUIT CouRT No. 1-JusrrcE wYLIE-Howard
University VS.. Thomas Dunnigan; Judgment by de-
fault. Thurber vs. L. f. Dorrj judgment for de-
fendant; nominal damages and costs. Swnrtzels
VS.. Wick; Judgment for possession and costs.
sewell VS.. MCCARTHY; Judgment for plaintiff re-
verscd. Connell vs. McLaughlin; Judgment for
plaintiff reversed, the plaintf falling to appear.
Miller VS.. Frederick ct al; non.sut by plaintiff.
May vs. jacob; certorari guoshod without cost.
Bnfgdor VS.. Wheeler; verdict for plaintiff for SIS,
with interest from October o. 1876. Holloran VS..
Tally; non.suit by consent. Mcl}ee vs. Kelley; non
suit by consent Kenney VS.. Smith ct al: non-suit
by the court no nppcaranceof counsel Coylo ct al.
vs. stuart CT al; the plaintiff not appearing nom
suit was entered by the court. Fowler vs. stevens
Ct AL; suits dismissed as to the gqrnshee.
Jordan VS.. Bryan Bro; verdict for plaintiff for
sos 49, with interest from June II, 1877. Whiteside
VS.. Baltimore IL rotomac Railroad Company; judg-
mont for defendant. Killnn ct al, trustees, VS..
Freund judgment below affirmed without costs.
Appeman Il Mumper vs. Provost proceedings be.
fore justice of the peace set aside. Willis VS. Ly-
decker non-suit. Wadsworth VS.. Cottre judg-
| ment for SG5 and costs against surety Rutherford
| vs. Meyers ct al. motion toquash overrulod Grady
| judgment against gurnisheu reversed. Woser "
Adams VS.. Anderson; non-sut by the court. Babe
| ct nj. VS.. Morse ct al; verdict for defendant.
| Travers VS.. Rowland ct al. Judgment Of condcm-
nation. Farmers aud Mechanics Savings Bank
of Alexandria va vs. b. NJ. smith ct al; iudg
ment by default forsl, 81 n. Manogue VS.. Ritchie
| ct al. leave to amend declaration.
CIRCUIT COURT No. Justice Cox.-Merrick
ct al. VS.. Gcttings; commissioner appointed to take
| testimony. McCeney VS.. Wellington; non suit by
| plaintiff Thompson VS.. Foley; appeal dismissed.
Wormley VS. Evans; suit dismissed. Transue VS..
| Wright suit dismissed. Perrin VS.: Knowlton; suit
| dismissed. Abbott VS.. Vierkorn; Judgment by de-
fault after credit OF $685. 49, Roman Il Cox VS., Stew
| art; judgment by default. Meano & Co. vs. Sheele;
| Judgment confessed.
/
| liesen vs.. Bergmann ct al. final decree adjusting
| the rights of parties. Lombardy VS.. Lombardy;
decree of divorce. St John VS.. ST. John; decree OF
| divorce. King VS.. King; proceedings set aside for
| irregulnrty Gross VS.. Gross; submitted. shreve
| VS.. Shreve; submitted. Note VS. Nolie referred to
| the auditor. National Capital Insurance Company
VS.. Russell; pro conesso SGT aside; twenty days al
| lowed TO answer.
| CRfMINAL CoURT-JUsTICE HAGNER.-William
| C. c. Cole counsel for the defendant. filed de-
murrer to the Indictment that it failed to show the
materiality Of the matter with which the prisoner
stands charged set down for hearing next satur-
| day. Lyder Barber, grand larceny of $500 from
Henry Rochat; guilty; one year in the peniten;
tlaTy. James Adams larceny; arraigned and
| pleaded not guilty. John Brown, burglary and
| larceny; George V. Leech and Samuel II. Ellis, two
| witnesses for the Government, not appearing and
| delaying the trial, an attachment was issued for
| them, but on proper explanation being made,
showing that misunderstanding existed as to
the time Of their appearance the attachment was
Tense James, Adams. petit larceny, second Of
tense; Tolman Lee larceny John Danny, alias
Budd Adams, larceny, second ofersc; James Gray,
larceny Edward Alexander, larceny; Michael b.
| Murphy, forgery, four cases James Adams lar
ceny; Lewis Johnson, petit larceny, second otiense,
| Washington, larceny of q horse, harness and
wagon, the property of i. NJ. Draney; not guilty.
| ASSIGNMENTS FOR TO-DAY.
| SUPREME COURT OF THE DIsTRICr-CHIEF JUSTICE
CARTIER AND JUSTICE JAMEs.-No. 90, Roach VS.
Moran; 90; Buntys Hart Hart 6S, Rirk vs. White %
| COrllZpr EnyOllp
Texas & Pacific Railroad Company 50, Pickering
VS.. Kcnga; 81, Strait VS., Strait.
Townsend & Wellsys. Stafford o. Starl;weather VS.
Corcoran; 81 Fitzmorrs VS., Duke; 40, snowden VS..
Ianifer g. - eeogand vs., Main 2, GG 49, Price vs.
Howgate; SO, Waggaman VS.. Lacey; IS, Plass VS.
Haskell; 81, Nailor vs. Barrotu & Mullin; 80 Brown.
vs. Knehlmg Is, Denny vs.. McEeldcn o. Mc iS
mott Bros. VS.. Solomon; 80 jenkins VS.. Taylor 105
Buckley. VS.. Gallagher lO7, Cannon VS.. Levi; lO9
| Camp vs. Groat ll5, Dunn VS.. Derringer ct al; III
Davis, use Of vs.. IIuoni ll9, Nef, use Of vs. Bar
ker ct al; l2l, Kelly. vs. Courtney; 1913, Howard VS.
Irwin 1875, Fleisher Bro VS.. Hazel; 100, Jones VS.
Ioughton; 49, Conley VS., Miller.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 2-JusTIcE Cox.-No. COZ
garnan VS.. Courtney; 70, Banks vs. Leadingham ant
Mccarthy vs. Walsh; IS, Moore e vs. Hughes 50
Vanderwerken vs. Hartman 4 Sons; S. Whiting VS.
Reiss; 92 Seduction Park Company VS.. Bcckman
90, CaruSi YS. Morrlson. IS, Coyle vs. BuSey; 100
Rhodes VS.. Casey ct al: l02 Berge VS.. Alexander
lOi Gartel McLain: LOG, Carr Breitbarth, los
Jones VS.. Main; 1851 Joachim vs. Cavis; 40, ben
nett VS., Wilson; III, Barber q Co. VS.. Noerr; ia
Barnes VS.. Grouse; ll6 Yaikenburg VS., Colman; lis
Derle ct al VS.. Burnstene: 100 Foley vs.. Brock
l22 Fowler VS.. Mccoy; l2i, Bergman 4 Son Vi
Wright ct al; l26, Clymer VS.. Vandenburg ct al
$780, Douglass VS.. Merryinan 1888, Creswel ct al. vs.
Wheeler i42, Turner VS.. Shea; Ia Grouse vs. Rus
sell; no Eglof vs. Starr las Light VS. Reside; 100
Hume VS.. Barker l4. Wiegle VS.. Kelly; 1866, Harri
son VS. Thompson; 1853, Riordan VS. Murphy gar
nislee; 100, Roach VS.. O'Connell ld2 Palmer vs.
Cooley Gi, Fulton Foley ct AL: 100, Mcclure vs.
Whesde; los Carson VS.. Pope; 40 Brummel VS.
H0yencr; III, THONGS VS., Thawi l7G, Chambers VS.
Ashton Ct al; u.s. Lyon vs. Held 49, Davis VS.
| Warnstall,
EQuITY CoURT--JUSTfcE MACARTHUR. No. IL
| BroderiCk vs.. Gibbons; 49, Ford VS.. Lyon 49, Bette
, vs. Carrico; 81 Wilson VS. Caam: 80, Stuart vs.
Beverly; 20, Douglass Vs. CLARK; ~. Campbell VI
Kendall SO, Mcdaniel VS.. Fowler. 80. Adamantin
Brick Company vs. Woodruff; 49, McMullcn v:
McMullen.
CRIMiNAL COURT - JUSTICE HAGNER.--Tolmal
Lee alias Tyler Lee, larceny; John Cole, aims Chri
Johnson, petit larceny, second oiiense Edmun'
Alexander larceny; James Adams, alias AleNOil
der petit larceny, second ohcnsc John DanZy
petit larceny, second ofcnse; John Brown, bur
t gary and larceny.