The Phoenix herald., 1879-04-23
COURT PROCEED1AGs
District Court.

I prevail stayed IN case Oh willing vs.
Ayers on motion OF Acting District
Attorney Baker.
Grand Jury came into court and
submitted II report OF their proceed
ings
1t appearing to the court that the
Grand jury had ignored the charges
against Silas Tidwell who is under
bonds to appear at this term of court,
and against Andrew Cook, who is in
custody. Ordered, that the bonds
men OF Tidwell be released, and that
Cook be discharged from custody.
In the case of Miller Is. Tidwell
and Nichols. on motion of counsel,
preliminary judgement of referee set
aside and final judgement in accord
ance with prayer of the plaintiffs.
Leave granted Martin, the receiver,
to file his report, and counsel for
plaintiff argued the case before the
court.
Recess.
Territory of Arizona Us. Linville,
charged with assault to commit muir
der, dcfendent pleaded not guilty.
In the case of Miller VS.. Tidwcll
and Nichols, on the hearing of mo-
ton to set aside report and prclimi-
nary judgement Of the referee, mo-
ton argued by counsel and case
submitted to the court.
Adjourned to meet April 10Th at 10
O'Clock.
April 19th-Court opened pursuant
to adjournment, Hon. Judge Porter
presiding.
Case of Kimball & Hoag KS. John
son and Murray, on motion Of plain
tiff case reinstated on the calendar
ana by consent of the parties was
submitted to the court on the plead
ings for judgement and court ordered
judgement for defendants.
Application of Christopher CHARLES
Tell Skirrow TO become citizen OF
the United States considered.
Case of Territory Us. Linville hay
ing been set for this time, jury was
empancled and case proceeded.
Opened by District Attorney Baker
for Territory.
Recess.
Grand Jury appeared and reported
two indictments, to-wit: The Terri
tory of Arizona against Pulchtagiu-
chy and Territory Of Arizona against
F /. Peters.
Grand Jury retired.
After examination Of witnesses for
plaintiff and defendant and argu-
mcnts hy the attorneys, court il
structed the jury and they retired for
deliberation in the case OF the Terri
tory rs. Linville-
Court stood at recess awaiting the
return Of the jury.
Jury returned at 1920 p. m and it
Was found that they had not agreed
on a verdict. They were ordered to
return again.
Case of Goldman & Altschul rs.
Golden Star Mining Company, or
dered continued for the term by con
sent of counsel.
Case of Sarah Edgar IS. Golden
Star Mining Company, ordered con-
tinued tor the term by consent Of
counsel.
Jury in case of Territory Us. Lin
Vile ordered into court at II IS p II.
and it being found that they had mol
a greed on Il verdict they were in
structed that if they should agree
before 10 o'clock, Monday, April 21st,
hey could bring in & sealed verdict
Court then adjourned till Monday
april 21st, at 10 o'clock a. m.
April 21st-Court met pursuant TO
Hon. Judge Porter
In case of Territory of Arizona vs..
Linville, the jury appeared and sub /
nitted to the court u sealed verdict
IS follows:
We, the jury, find defendant guilty
IF ASA ii and battery.
WIN. RUFF, Foreman.
4. s. Clark admitted to practice in
his court.
Case of Territory of Arizona vs..
Peters, indicted for murder, set for
rial at II o'clo OK a. IN. Tuesday, [
4 mil 22d.