, 1879-06-13
THE COURTS.

NFoCcCuiHk4 1e6LGrNh5-NpW oAlEst NuAk~
mcntx, Etc.
Judge Diodgttt yesterday dfsnisacd the psta-
iion for bill Of review in the case Of Nathan
Powell Vs. Henry II. Walker AMI others. The
original suit was bill filed hy Powell In July,
1874, TO forec,ose q mortgage for $A0,5o0, ou
which balance OF sl9 900 Has then due, on tic
N. E. n Of thu 8. W. u Of Sec. 8, 3S Ii. In
June, 1876, final decreo OF foreclosure vas
entered for St4, S5l3, md ordering sale Of the
property in the Inverse order Of It's alienation
! by Walker. An appeal was then taken To the
Supreme Court Of the United States, where, in
accordance with the decision III the Brine case,
| tho decree, having ordered q sale without re-
| demution, was reversed or modified so As
to give the mortgagors The usual right 10
\ rcilccm Some OF tho purchascrs OF parts
| Of the property from Walker recently nlcl
petition for revIeW on The ground OF errors a7-
parent on the TACO ot the record as TO the order
In which the lots uerp sold, and also Oh the
! ground OF new1y-dlscoyoreA evidence. The
Judge sntl that he doubted whether the casu
was one to call for thu application Of the rule Of
snc III inverse order Of alIeuaiio but, even It i
did not, tlle party making the application ~, ooutd M
| claim to nlo bill Of regcw for matter apparent
On the facs of the record, It was too late now 10
i1le such bill. 1.acf,cs could not be reme'iiei
.S.s.er NJ ssH evcn avaabis It Il showed 10 tsicnss
The petition Nas therefore dsBmtBsea.
| rua LANAI 1NBuRANoB COMPANY.
In the case Of Burnhnm vs. The Lamar 1usur.
| aace Company, the hecelycr, George Chandler,
filed petition setting out tllat IN Jnnrary last
an asscss,nent Of 20 per GENT was levied against
| the stockholders OF the Company Most OF the
parties prefer to stnnd lawsuit flrst, but the
! following have offered to settle their liability
agaiuat tho Company to the full amount Of their
liability, and thus canccliug their Indebtedness:
]. @. Ilyth,. owntnE $1,000 worth Of stock;
Schneider y Lotnger s1,e9; G,b F. tude]ph; 800;
$1,000: T.. !: Ruyaods, q, ,oo9; n: II.
$1,000; M. Koch, $500; ". J.. Sweeney, $500;
stoddaE *59,; paya pow ss9; ss9,. Sasoe
III. s1,NU; petcr Fries, sl,0O0; Erncss Krcu,
Meyerha,scr & benk1uanp, sa,0oo: Ratfaaef
StqSfl@ Mtsoa cris isis sm%ons nx so6; Gai,ia
Trnesdnic, ST, 900; Thilip Kcone, s50; Stuart &
McAlllster, $500; N. Koseuileld, *Su; =. Il.
Warner, $500; A. E. LTfora, S5oo; 7. j. ROBIN. u
Igaatz llnhar, s., 900; c. splodcl, $1,000: ". Il.
HaYes, $500. These amount to Sc, $40 In all,
On which the assessment Is 81, $40. The Re
ceEyer askci to DO allowed to setse these ciatsas
Judge Moore to that effect.
In the case Of Needles vs.. Tho 1!opublic Life
Insurance. Company. the claim OF W. II. ".
Cusllnau for $10, 0N was allowed.
Hurry from Iorstio T. Hurry on the ground Of
UNITED srArEs COURTS.
Thomas sayles filed bill yestcrlay against
Clarsncc ]. reck to restrain him from using q
patent for al Improvement tn caF-bFakes,
granted April i, 1859, to l.. +. Thompson aud
A. g. Nocheldor>
surER1oR COURT IN nRtER.
The Rece!ves Of tie Lama. Insurance Com
pany begun suits against the following parties
Van Duzen, s50o; George E. Ma1on, $500; L.
WeybrIck. $500; a1il John q. Peck, $4OD.
The Union hnsual Llfo-lnstranco Company
fled b!ll aEsinst Jsmss Nolan e. rnd the .i,,'
Cornelius Donohue. and others. 70 forecioss a
trust-dccd for e, 0Q0 on tho N. n Of Lot II, ami
ihe aouth loot of Lot 10, Block 70, Vi Johnston,
Robert Il StorIs' Addition to Chicago.
ii. r. Hortreu and Lorenzo Potter sued Robert
Elizabeth Smith commenced \ suit in tresoass
against D. ". Saunders, claiming $4,000 dAnl-
Isabella Leslie tilea bill sgainst Hiram,
Myron j., Pleasant, And Julia Amck, Martha
ssx 5o'ep m sn9a 9So sorEo ao " ale.a Msy + s
decd for eco on Lot H. Block y, tn II ]. llsm
tltons subdiylslon Of that part south OF Jackson
street Of the "; u Of thc:E. (oxsept TUG Ncs'
sss Sa3si Ct 1ns \ ;qsd M Sdss T. 81 Eli. 70,
Faal A. Boysaen i1,cd bill against Andrew
, j. Gamer and Eunica G. Qalnar TO fcreclosa .
MORTGAGE for $1,000 on Lots ! and = block B.
, George Bartela filed a blu against his partner
Ernst Pope, to astto up Me psrtansrrshlp p II r L
, Bremen, ot running Ertst-inilt.
PROBATE COURT,
] r.. fha nafntn nf William H. (1ffE dhrhA ssh
} proof Of will was made, and letters tcatamenta
iy tssuod to George G. Otis. under bis indlvld
laE bond Of $4,000, which waa approved.
tiuarliar's letters In the estate Of Louise
Stow, minor, wore Issued to Franklin w. Stow,
und Iond Of $3.,lN0 approved.
Tbs Will OF Jane Hancock, deceased, VA.
proved and adm,ttSa " %.. to o5Geqfd + aa., no
J OF guardianship were Issued to Clark Ltpa; bone
Q of B3,D00 approved. =.
: ln thu estata OF i4ucretia Porter, deceased
o Jacob Fotron, flled: Letters documentary ,tu
: Whcion. '"..'...~
COUNTY COURT.
Judge Loou.ss gavs Judgment for the Llueoie
! Park speclal assessment whcrc no, objection
had been hlcd. Thlrty.ono objections to til,
. geneta! tax, faMs to tbs South tssE, nnd ono Il
! thu Lincoln Park tax wcso alcl. Monday VA
The following. persons wcre found to be In
! sahe: Emily Falcon, not q pupcr; Mrs. Catha
rlua urttllu aad Catherine Bradley.
= = TnH CALL.
Jupau HAnLAM-No court; at his rooms Ia th
9 junas p1oDoarE-74 TO 11a, inclusive. No cas-
@ .5a % T. ~ r. ssss Si ss.. WET =: .s:t FL
d Jvnak J4nrsos-7.,ssA. City N. Smith, o.
!. JUDaa MooaH-3, 8. o,7. No. 9, Sexton "
J. Lawrence W Ilhl' ,o, o,,, mn :. ~, ,.,.