The Worthington advance., 1879-06-05
ssI:s ssSis !iess% |5S' SS'Ss ge!'
- en, brs dpslAs IIntly re nj

#sdilx snI Gaahs e 9.r pja!fs 2.asS
:s':s :: s:s!: e w. q . :::E s:s:s
81 e n z. -
,,;e@ad frs"S. eSsasSa xasa tssu ~ HNnntuee: On
-$ I:%WG.gIlE e u Az ssSns ~ sae. e.oSgtan:9g
ssniessfS - suSs1 &c 1o11u cetss!n
"1Ss,1.s,s;s Fan~ fesI M1.ca asa. oeeh ca'leu
eI"S~.e nan.4ss;. 1. sn@ mu nur.1snso ny
hse. ~ sJ 4aey nsG nos
LINZ sGS:;i, :; nstsoe ~ - ta1ea oh
81 H.: *. ha.F ~ 49,: s.As" ~ .ae ocatn-
thkG,SsTT - nr;nt ~ russe 49, w.
$500 a. * y I.sns .ana c pspn tnns
-r"%.h Osun IN sne & record OF IT. tns oomhittee.
80 sano 1ns'g Pspes. con.
. 81 ~, aiqc noe oRrstsnd re TO aax
15t isysstG:fsd sSs 1In HSM;e;se
ma ~ hC{3t4 r.. ,aSY9 tta9, aV coRte:
.nsdNas ss q, s;the eonhiass1erStsI - 5o'
,-.Aas.Am - Ie1 "oos. m s.os9 pol9s was enas:tae
s1o.".S.;.'.' 4. ,a 49, % yp..teuon e PsolIe IN,
ssea.sS "a pint them 'ior use a.e os + ths eo%. one
Xas1f0 raid d.ts tns same % practice Is.
a 81 ttsiimony fnr %;st,;b"t;on "I s'Ways xn &C. &C.
..S,c~~ y -. "'"'''""'"n .io" Inc
~ %SS.t,",E- ..La' e -. >. -, -,
snofe of tbo 3sners in refen.ncr." H,s"snho Mnoe
sp.ta =. as :"
W~nn 1T SkaobA
than ~ n."s"s TESe.a ~ ~ spesS = p
saoI ~ pePe.s Nlu Deiole Tue eommntee. he
S31Y sayve t0 e5sonlpSs a4'
vt tness leHg ~ Is9nFg 70
sso.tas Ms.,s a.t as.a ~ :
nss NHs, ~ Aau1nan, =. senator hafris having
III. ..t.e1 ha4 ye.l., ss.A ~ An1W , some
knL'sse Is e'ous ae is.o.eu eu 'so. nhen the
n",,sa t.nt o. ms!slln M ana anotnsr, what
.Ts nra.s lid s NO. tss,p pa,s;I ;th aarine
Pesponed @ be testimony! sAe Crhnrman)
~ Deiole tne eommastee went south to
Ases'ossnSoo oons' 80 speovioo IN -elec-
n.;a, 4. Mseons ns;n1o aulans. .PoAsaeel cam
ps'sn .nam1ng sFncles app s:co 70 prove that no
II. III. - - t0PuunssIt I - .ne sn4a!n nao
.s ra. AtA ~ we itt Moment:: e:7 iae com4.ttees
soe. t;s,e .f.os n1nars.s at h!!, t;s:
KXS Wefo sseieoseo' enq tnne pub
ae.onnc.d me d'a r. dsisnd .sts th,a rs
.iai s.pissIs ssn.tor Bi.;ssa b. s.Ssss .;sup' %
INA u e ~ s.k ad the et.sr gsstleman
= saeeS9s. 20 .Ss9se r. apHAenses !3HKqi shAylug
sp% ::s xss
seessaass WEE tssse.pfsS fs a shs
peIs
Senator !hurmahisaid be had probably voted
e. lad aa yaesd net the .t rSen eS%
',,Sef iate1tigation., and be would no more try a
!: Whole people, people, OF . whole party in the dark
s:t! aoa .oula stngle man. But II any SUCH
onpeoeoss.on We, VA maze .;!, lt w. xote6 down IN
- ~ sn.te .1o aanlaf MOTION o1 democratic
49, nSn sAn ~ Coneless was s'o vo!ed down.
ca n0nte9s pialne sag II any naming procIama-
seS IN OF
occusfed bstoEe he mmitiee, but the dis.
patcAee&onShAslsaton when Tie committee
H.at3f9awere nacnous pe1Yersioaf q fact
senator thurman replied that if there had
s'ieen such mlsrepresentatisn it vas an addi-
se2na! nr9ument Tor open Investigation Wen
s9cn i4lp9s conlo not happen. What he com.
pssaneo OF III INC action ot the hakla1 COM
!nlttec was tnat portions Oh the testimony bear
se .ea ths all
senator Dsxas aid that as rhurm,e W. re-
xa7XH% <kIg 5Iuo.TSe 5chn.T 2SXX eeNccI h;nt :,
vxSf%b4eTsheJ he Would l;I& x hSVs t{St 1p1. San.
tleman explain the source from which obtained.
III, esnstff THURMAN 4 = replied BE- did pot1 know
sAhasi SAs hattnster aseas ths ddeamehs. 1When
asksf f produce :evidepce, bearing on his
ing the Teller committee, he had responded by
J seRtngs = qusntity Of informatasp which had
o5%s%' 'iskSss t'''' '''''e = s us among
oeaseOF cameron reMarkeu EnAis the uocu-
Il Ylept offered BY Thurman must have also been
* as % nlss asi Ssfar. sar
otAe prikinslPsper st tAers.S-.I' Sytss sS =
It, lSenoPr Thurman. The letter fronG ~ Sen
"ootiss ny lstte's get II the papers in. 10 sepe
s"e!.s h'H,,t,n, ~ q. f'7F5s.ssp; ,rsSs :
,sn noio CON m.ttee reaponsinle Tor the publica-
Hsion OF whse pnrported to be transaottons:
as1aeL teeefts appear in newspapers Of what
'kses pm n executive session, the secrecy o1
wnicn no ex-senator can be supposed to violate
asci.,v az 4. na
sided statement and one forgery, ~ he be-
"ih9v0o WAA now admitted, though the COMMITTEES