Daily Los Angeles herald., 1879-04-15
Supreme Court.
MONDAY, April, IA, 1879.

The Supreme Court of the Stat
of California was this day dul,
opened at the city of Los Angeles
for the April term, 1870, thereof ac
oording to law.
Present-Hon. VIM. II. Wallace
G. j.; Hon. A. G. Niles, j.; Hon. e
w. McKinstry, j.; d. b. Woolf
Clerk; H. Finkler, BaiIiff.
The following proceedings wer,
had:
6472. CarriIlo vs.. McPhillips-
Motion to dismiss the appeal here
in argued by White for responder
and Brunson for appellant anC
further argument continued.
Hancock vs.. Lopez-On motion
of Hancock for respondent ant
Clerks certificate and notice o
motion on file, ordered that the ap
peal herein be and the same il
hereby dismissed.
People vs.. Miles ct al.-On mo
ton of Hamilton and affidavit OF
file, ordered that appellant have q
days additional time in which
to serve and file the transcript OF
appeal herein.
Kinds VS.. Gage ct al.-On motion
OF Hazard for appellant aud stipu
lation on file, ordered that thil
cause be placed at the foot of The
calendar of the present term for ar.
gument.
10393 People vs.. Bell-On mo
tion of Hamilton for People and
upon suggestion of a diminution OF
the record, ordered that amend.
ment to the transcript be filed
herein.
Butler vs.. Beach-On motion OF
Ross for appellant and stipulation
on file, ordered that this cause be
placed at the foot of the calendar OF
the present term for argument.
6552. Ames VS.. Eldred ct al.-On
motion of Ross for appellant and
stipulation on file, ordered that
this cause be placed at the foot of
the calendar of the present term
for argument.
642U. Lanterman vs.. Williams ct
al-On motion Of Barclay, for ap-
pellant, and upon suggestion of the
ieath of A. w. Williams, the re-.
'pondent herein, since the perfeo
ion OF this appeal, it is ordered
hat Mary G. Williams, Adella g.
Ketchum and j. Chester Williams,
executors of the last will and tesla.
ment of said A. w. Williams, de-
ceased, be substituted as respond
ents in this cause, in place and
stead of A. w. Williams, deceased.
104O5. People VS.. Kerrick-On
motion of Budd, for appellant, and
affidavit and ipulalion on file, or.
Tered that this cause be continued
:" the May term, 1879, at Sacra-
mento.
County of San Luis Obispo vs..
Oaks-On motion of Graves, for re-
spondent, and stipulation on file,
'rdered that this cause be placed
IN the calendar of the present term
IND set for argument on Thursday,
April 18th.
60GS. Hancock VS.. Lopez ct al
Notion that remittitur herein issue
forthwith submitted by Hancock
for respondent.
6072. Hancock vs.. Recha ct al
Motion that remittitur herein issue
forthwith submitted by Hancock,
or respondent.
6474 People ex rel Stephens,
Judge, etc., vs. Sepulveda, County
Auditor-Argued by Stephens in
PIP. and Smith for respondent and
mandamus denied.
r. FL. Ward admitted to practice,
on motion of Hon. 10 Hamilton
and proof of license from the Su-
preme Court of Arkansas.
In the matter of the application
of VIM. T. McNealy to be admitted
to practice as an attorney aud
counselor in all the Courts of this
State:
The said VIM. It. Nc Nealy per-
.onally appearing in open Court
for the purpose of personal exam
nation as to his learning in the
law, and the Court being satisfied,
0y reference to the records now re.
naming In the Court and the pro.
ceedings heretofore had in this
Court, touching the qualifications
Of the said VIM. Z. McNealy in
point Of learning in the law, that
the said VIM. 7. Men ealy possesses
the requisite qualifications in that
behalfand is in all respects q proper
person to be admitted to practice,
and certificate In due form hav.
ing been first duly fled as required
by the first Rule of Practice,
10 is ordered that the said viii.
liam I. McNealy be and he is here.
by admitted to practice as an at
torney and counselor IN all the
Courts of this State.
In the matter of the application
of William E. Turner to be admit
ted to practice as an attorney and
counselor in all the Courts of this
State.
The said William e. Turner per-
sonally appearing in open Court for
the purpose of personal eXamina-
tion as to his learning in the law,
and the Court being satisfied by
reference to the records now re-
naming in the Court, aud the pro-
ceedings heretofore had in this
Court touching the qualifications OF
the said William e. Turner in point
of learning in the law, that the said
William E. Turner possesses the
requisite qualifications in that be
half and is in all respects proper
person to be admitted to practice,
and a certificate in due form hav.
ing been first duly filed as required
by the first rule OF practice, it is Or
dered that the said William e.
rurner be and he Is hereby admit
ted to practice as an attorney and
counselor in all the Courts of thi-
State,
Mr.. Justice Crockett and Mr.. Jus
tice Rhodes present.