, 1879-04-16

tt'at a1y, aud BY permission caye 1cr, abe ro
fna!nctl here until that ticket ran out.''
NnnllY come httcF hertz
came after her The next day.t
:. "A,,d 1l1!,, tex h. heF r; down e CiInc!nnatii'
How lou0 did she rer,nin at Cincinnati The
8ecuni timet"
.,,s "se re.,aae1 Until the 22d of November,
"nll you board or keep |ouau thcrca"
We kept house for ,yhfie, nn1 A,cu went
to bo"ra W. boarded ut thu tIme sl,e loft
"Did yuu ltave any lsunslcrstandlngs dur
shg ": 6ecund trip to Cincinnatilf
month"; ;"
"from what did those misunderstanding
"Aga'n letters wlltcl, 1 discovered from Chi.
"Whcre did you discover those lctters!,'
had.fscr own prEratu BUREAU"
81 "hngs 'ssc you 1'., those !, letters now'"
"Mhas did you Do With theus'
..ah1' "al'os9 IesssTs gave to her aud she de-.
"llow do you know she DESTROYED tiem,"
say Ahe told lne why"
DID size destroy thcnf''
"shc did destroy them right before n,c."
"Iow n.any ot those letters wcre tllrsels
"Wl,otn wcrc they fron."
ge5t;" ''' ''A
"i,s1e ns,e,;s was !; Hne signed Billy Dav..'"
"0nc from Mrs. Young.t'
ecr.i" >' ''~ ''''' '''' 1"'
These letters fsutn Billy Dnyls and Enrcrt
were destroyed. were tlUv!h
.''Fllcy wcrc dcstroycd.''
" w. yonr ,i4 ! ,pgfcse"ecf"
DID YOU and your wife hare any mtsundcr.
stan.!inss growing out uf those letters Fl
Yes sir, yes, sir"
The answer comes with peculiar cnpbasts.
STATE as nearly ~ you can remember the
ters.n 1''&s's w.
"Wa!t monen.," e1catms Weber. nff tho
same rulcs Of cvidenre npplY In caso Of this
k,nu as tnos9 IN clyIl ca:ea, tflcn those 1ctters
would not bc ndmlssfblc, because 1t appears
tsre .,, !as becn conformation, nnl they becoinv
"Ilts % not divorce case" rctorts storrs.
res, 1at tisc saulc rulcs apnly, as unlcr-
sta1ul. They don't contend tslas ho acted upo,
those 1cttcrs.h 0'
THAT is another natter" says the Court. II
liavo already indicated tlat cstinntc tlicso let
, tsss On ls sa1ne principle as tlc testimony Of
course. Whether they DO o. not d for the jurv.
rh!s Is mt case Of tie divorce sort THIS Is
tito question: What was their tending an tle
mind o. the prtsoneri That Is ul1,'i
Mr. Weber quotes the drctlon in Ills 1.outsf-
anu caae, aHtl says: II think, II tI1fs opion IN
law, under ttat ruling these letters hero ought
to hc excluded. Tl,ts Is muctl stronger rnsu
t!an tlIc CASE Ut bar. Here the ease WIS lint uf
Improper conduct by tlIc wife, ulul thu Insulting
OF the husband! by her paramuuF which was of7
isFed as rredisposlng casc Of Insanity, a,ll tic
Court ruled It out"
aln entirely willing to rcargue this prcat
question, II II tIn1 mt been sufficiently nrvuctl.
nnd to show tint 1t isn't law and never wns.H
eays StoTrs, tfium p!lantIy.
oiil satisfied With my ruling on tl,at tues
tton," utils the Court,
So ana lon tllut branch OF It cptIrely.n
chimes III Siorrd.
~ ant satisfied on all l,ranctrs," adds Weber.
"but II 1t is to oc rcopcncd hero W. viii argus
It,"
Storra. f'' 1'1
III Is now O'Clock" suggests tic Court,
"niHt VIC VIII take rccrss until 30
Tile crowd 1fnws oil, therefore, for mn hour.
Tn retusntnE iii tile afternoon tllu cruwu IS
ercr larger tl!un Mt tho tnurntu., session. tl,e
news that Pete 10 OIL the staul evidently having
E0ue nbrOal,