The Phoenix herald. (Phoenix, Maricopa County, A.T. [Ariz.]) 1879-1882, 1879-04-26
CGE2T PR0C2ED2A oi.s.
District Court.


morcd 10y the sheriff Of Maricopa 81
by one of his deputies; 2d, That III
return On the Yen;re is untrue and
incorrect in this, that the rctgrr
shows that \. c. Mcdonald, under
sheriff. summoned the said jury,
whereas the said jury was summoned
by ". Blankenship. VI no was not 3
she.if's officer. 81. That the returns
on the ven;rc has been changed and
altered and that the grand jury who
appear on the return were not the
grand jury who were summoned to
appear. 9Th. One Of the grand
Jurors who found the Indictment IS
an alien and not competent 20 serve
as 4 grand juror. 5th, The grand
jury allowed other persons, not mem
beers Of the grand jury to be present
in the grand jury room and to offer
and 90 introduce evidence upon which
the Indictment was. found and the
said persons were neither Of them
district attorneys cf ;l.is court and
had not the legal authority &c act IS
such.
Tie court took the matter under
aGvisemeut
II. Morgan sworn as Interpreter.
Territory Of Arizona vs.. Jutchta.
oIa.chv Casp sci for trial on Tuesday
st II O'Clock q. II.
Grand jury appeared and presented
the following indictments, to-wit:
Territory Of Arizona rs. Quiseno
Estrada. charged with assault with z
deadly weapon with intent 10 infiict
bodily injury on the person Of an
other, considerable provocation ap-
pearing therefor.
Territory OF Arizona IS. Angel
sanches, charged with grand larceny.
Recess.
In case Of Territory vs. Estrada
defendant took time to plead and
trial set for Tuesday, 3 O'Clock p. N.
Territory Of Arizona IS. Angel
Sanches- Defendant took time to
plead and case set for trial Tuesday
at o'clock p. II.
Court adjourned to 10 o'clock a N.
Tuesday.
April 22d-Couri met pursuant to
Hon. Judge Porter PIE
siding
IN the csse Of Arizona Is Invite
defendant appeared for Judgement
and having no suiicienteaUse to sho"
Why Judgement should net cc pro
uoHaccd, he court proceeded to give
Judgement rs follows: That Hiram
Il. L;-vil!e he Enei in the SUM O,
seven hundred and fifty dollars a1d
imprisoned in The county jail at the
rate Ct three dollars per day until
said fne IS paid, not to exceed two
hundred and fifty days.
In the case Of Territory OF Arizona
vs. Peters counsel for defendant
moved to &c; aside the Indictment on
the ground that the grand jury re
reived other than legal evidence as
shown by the indictment.
Motion denied and defendant ap-
pcared and plead rot guilty Trial
set for Wednesday al 10 o'clock.
Territory Of Arizona Ks. Miguel
Estrada. By consent Of counsel for
plaintiff the defendant pleaded guilty
to the offcnse Of petit larceny and
waived trial for sentence When the
court sentenced the defendant to i'm
in the county Jail for the
period of one month, or in lieu there
IF fine at the rate OF one dollar per
iiem Of such sentence.
Territory Of Arizona vs.. Sanchez.
In this case the same pieadings and
sentence as in case Of Estrada.
Territory of Arizona vs.. Gutsch-ta-
-ls.cbv. Defendant pleaded ruilly
# assault and battery and waving
ime for sentence was committed to
county Jail for thirty days, or in lieu
thereof 2 fine of thirty dollars.
.i-.-1aI ,-,,.1,,- 70 assa,,I,
'na battery ana waving '-'i'e i"i sen
renee was conn i't7'' 70 ''"""'S J"ii