Clarksville weekly chronicle. (Clarksville, Tenn.) 1873-1890, 1879-02-22
Chancerr Court.
The following decisions have been rem.
dered since cur last issue:

The following decisions have been REM
dered since cur last issue:
White VS.. White. Pro confesso.
Wilson vs.. Ramsy. inal decree.
Dick vs.. Bradley. Report confirmed.
Montgomery Co. by kennedy vs.. Court
of County.
Killebrew vs.. johnson. Decree pro con-
Wootton VS.. wootton. Bill dismissed.
.Cowlishaw vs.. Cowlishaw. Order to sup
ply papers burned.
Grange Warehouse VS.. Tyson. Order o.
jenkins VS.. Mallory. Sale confirmed.
Kendriclx, Hambaugh & Co. VS.. w. G.
Williams. Decree for complainant.
station VS.. station. Pro onfesso.
Mallory vs.. Mallory. Order for alias pro-
cess.
Puss Stacker VS.. Lewis. Decree pro con-
Merritt VS.. McBee. Pro confesso.
Peacner vs.. Poindexter. Order to pay
mont.y into Court.
Morgan VS.. bryan. Order for report.
Ussery VS.. Vaughn. Order pro confesso.
A. w. Fink Elk Parte. order Of naturaH-
cation.
Barnett and Wife VS.. Grant. Report OF
sale confirmed.
Poston vs.. Poston. Sale confirmed, and
Executors amount confirmed.
Pollard vs.. Barker. Decree of Sale.
Peacher VS.. Peacher. Order of ference.
state Of Tenn. VS.. Orphan Asylum. New
Halliburton v. Hall. Decree TO transfer
fund to County Clerk.
Williams VS.. Dortch. Demurrer sustained.
Beaumont VS.. Beaumont. Guardian ad
Item appointed.
Spalding vs.. Halsell. Sale confirmed.
Caldwell VS.. Dixon. Order of reference.
Johnson VS.. Ogburn. Sale confirmed.
Watson VS.. Watson. Motion TO dismiss
over-ruIed.
GoodIett vs. Humphreys. Reviving cause
as to Humphreys Admir-, and Diminishing as
TO other parties.
MoseIey vs. MEGA ley. Report OF C. and
NJ. confirmed and Judgment MS to Moseley.
Morgan q Co. VS.. Jackson, McKernon &
Co. New colaterial allowed substituted.
Caldwell vs.. Dixon. Judgment In favor of
BaggeLt VS.. Trotter.
HornOerger VS.. Hornberger. Order Of
reference.
johnson VS.. Conroy. Sale confirmed.
Kennedy vs.. Moss. Sale confirmed.
c. Bryan and Washington VS.. Mcdaniel.
Sale confirmed.
Kendrick. Hamburger & Co. VS.. Williams.
r port of Receiver confirmed.
Ewing VS.. Hitter. Sale confirmed.
| Neblett vs. Orgain. Order of reference.
Morgan & Co. VS.. jackson, McKernon &
Co. Reference.
Mcclure VS.. Mcclure. Bill dismissed.
Williams vs.. Doitch. Order allowing
| amended cross bill.
Geo. d. Jones vs.. VIM. Jones Heirs. Sale
Haiyard VS.. Kelly. sale ordered.
Johnson VS.. POindexIer. Final decree.
PeGtuS VS.. Herring. Decree of title.
Tanning vs.. Black. Sale confirmed.
Crabtrse W. New Providence Mills Co.
Herndon allowed to file Plea.
Peacher vs.. PoindeXter. Order Of sale.
Ewing VS.. Hitter. Order to supply papers
| burned.
Morgan & Co. VS.. Jackson, McKernon &
| Co. Brown allowed compensation.
Lewis VS.. Boyl. Sale confirmed.
| Pettus VS.. Herring. Fee ordered Guar
| dian ad Item.
/ Harris vs.. Mayfeld. sale confirmed.
| Smith VS.. Hallyard. Writ of possession
/ awarded.
| Station VS.. Station. Order of Sale.
Killebrew vs. Murphy. Decree for dover
| to Mrs. EedbetteI.
Hickerson VS.. county. Bill dismissed.
Sullivan vs.. County. Bill dismissed.
| White vs. Branch. Order Of sale.
Shelton VS.. Outlaw. Confirming report
/ of &. and NJ
! Neblett VS.. ORGAN. Order of sale.
| UsSery VS.. Vaughn. Order of sale.
| Hillman VS.. Marable Confirming report.
Killebrew vs. Johnson. Order of refer
ence.
| Hornberger VS.. Hornberger. Oruer in
/ vesting fund.
| Peacher VS.. Poindexter. Confirming re-
port.
Bowen VS.. Bowen. Granting divorce.
Ogburn VS.. johnson. Distributing fund.
| Peacher VS.. Poindexter. Order of sale.
| Peacher VS.. Peacher. Confirming report.
| Smith vs.. Halyard. Confirming report.