National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-11-17

Parker; 100 Mullins vs., Harding loi, Cooley rs,
Kennedy 1917, Schneider VS.. Schneider; 1914
Turner W. Ollver; ITO, McCarty VS.. McCarty; lll1S
land
CIRCUIT CouRr No 1--JUsrrcE wYI1E.-APPEAL
DoCKET-No. 127. Barnes vs.. Duncanson Regular
n ~ m 49, Ks9 oS hs w. CONF 5nS
pany vs. shecle; 227, Beverly VS. Roberts; 23I, Shea
vs.. 0fenstein; 2i3, Ruff VS.. brown; 3O5, Almon VS..
district t ' Of t cou@sb GS B $751; Washington Market
Company vs.. Kuhlman SS5, ,Ilrskine vs. Carly Ssa'
Kemble VS.. stockstill; 3il Weser US; Carter 49,
Evans, jr., VS.. Brown, Chamberlain Co.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 2-IusTICE Cox.-No. 1s,
IIunton VS.. Taylor; 5s Huber ct ux. VS.. Teuber
ct ux. 60, Teubor ct ux. VS.. Huber ct NIX. 50.
e ISaHs AND and Pnkard To- Archer vs. So PRATT 49,
Daley VS.. Trunnell; 1888, Reside, agent, vs. Lucas;
100, Thwing ct al. vs. Dean ct al; POS, French
VS.. MCPHERSON ct al; 2ll, Davis Sons vs. Smoot;
21S. Liebbechutz VS.. McNali; 900, Patterson VS.
MoSior; 222, District of Columbia vs. Forsyth; 226,
Bogue VS. Cropley; 122, O'Nea vs. District Of Colum-
bia 800 Wheeler VS.. Johnson 232, Northern Liberty
Market Company VS.. Killian; 2i2 Truesdel exc
cnor vs. Terry ct al; 2i6 Bridget VS.. Cornish; 2iS,
Hyatt vs. futile.
EoUrY CouRr-JusrIcE MAcARrnuR.-No. Q,
Ramsey vs. Daniels; 10, Nourse vs. Thornton; %,
smith vs. Smith 20, Rich vs. Neitzy; q, Davis VS..
Mnyyek: 2s Beckett vs.; Peckett 90. Marshall vs..
nedy; 3d. Fitzgerald vs.. Fitzgerald.
CRIMINAL CoURT-JUsr1CR HAGSER.-Robcrt CAL
lnhan selling liquors to minors; Charles T. Gnnter,
George r. Dent, loud and boistcrous talking; Rich.
ard Claxton, loud and boistorous talking; John r.
Henderson. unlicensed commissioned agent;
George M. Oyster x Co., unlicensed produce dealer;
Benjamin S. Donelson, unlicensed produce dealer;
Charles +. Hibbs, unlicensed produce dealer.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 2-JrsrIcE Cox.-Godey
VS.. Walers: judgment on referees award approved.
Davis W. Walstall d Son; motion for new trial
overruled. Thomas vs. Thsw same. Patterson VS..
MOsieT motion to qunsh writ of replcvin overruled
and appeal prayed. Wall w. Turner ct nj. judy
ment for plainiiH for s2Di7S, with interest from
December 20, 1876, and costs. Washington "
Georgetown Railroad Company VS.. District of Col.
umbia; n motion for new trial overruled
Equity CoURT-JusTIcE MACARTHUR.-E ckard
VS.. Blackburn: motion to strike out demurrer
ovcrrulod. Nourse VS.. Ashford; injunction PEN
deiltc lite granted. Jones vs. Jones; sale confirmed
nisi. Smith vs. Spaids; injunction continued pei,-
dcnto lite. Skinner VS.. skinner alimony pen.
dcnte lite at so per month. Trucsdcl vs.. Austin;
| sale confirmed finally.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 1-JUsTICE WYIIE.-Kemble
vs. Stockstlll referred to James H. Savilc. Jor,lan
| VS.. Bryan u Bro; motion for new trial granted.
Coblens & Wornitz vs. Rauh; motion for new trial
overrucd. Bailey VS.. Doherty; motion to quash
ccrtiorar granted. Rodgers vs. Pitt & Co.; motion
| for judgment overruod. Carly vs.. Douglas; mo-
ton to vacate judgment granted. Fraas VS.. Singer
Manufacturing Company; motion for new trial
granted. Wallnglord VS.. Maryman; motion for
new trial oyerrued.