, 1879-05-30
should be 11ven, 10 TINT the Auditor could havn
The warrants for tho payment Of tho mcnber9

bHDuIQ QlFEEf 6V tluk hAlC 4lNhlkut NOAA HHFu
The warrants for tho payment Of tho monbeT'
salaries.
On lie motion Of Matthews. The rules wero
suspended, and tic ]ofnt rctolution Tor an nd
tourument on Saturday was carried by viva
voen rpte.
Th,s settle. the u,at.er Of adjournment borond
a question, though targo nMount Of business
will bc left on the calendars Of 10th branches ot
the Assembly hanging tuat on tile verge OF
Bouaeo Bill ess, for an act to provide for tho
fees OF Clerks Of tho Probate Court Ii COUNTIES
ot the thtrsi eIats tCook Countyh 'yas passed.
Senate ,.s y ~, ~ to prevent tho Destruction Of
t;' Camnhci's mi Senate Bill aoa, 10 logal'zo the
lcnaps of railway ro1ling-stock, WAs lost.
aeuate Hill 334, 10 amend Sec. ! Of M act
In reFhsd TO evidence Rtid deposttlona IN civil
The Senate bill allowing two or n,ore Villages
to limits In establishing md operating work
tiouse was paseed: also The bill regulating tic
tnanner OF the Legislative inspection of State
1natltuttors.
Jones' seuuto Bill 10e for the protection Of
hanktlcposttors, created 4 great deal of dtscus'
stDtl.
This afternoon Trn.dc1l offered resolution
eens,lrtn4 tic Chief Clerk, William d. Taylor,
ior tl,e loss of Senate NH 1856, which tnystert-
ously disappeared inst night. Mr. Taylor has
heen vcry faithful aud otIlclent Clerk aud th!e
uujus.t1hble attnck iipon defcnseless ofl!cfal
Democrnts snl Repabl,csns, an,i tl,e resolution
was almost unanimously defeated. III regard
10 this matter, Mitchell said tlta Was m outrage
unparalleled IN tho history Of tho legislation
ss sep f'' not St. G. out aae! aon an eu! ''sS, ss
faithful, anl distinguished Clcsk, as loug as he
could raise his 7ofcc aeutnat 1t. The CLERK had
right to tros'lmo that he Was aurrOu1tlca with
men Of honor ana integrity, nn4 II some orc
man vas IN fact thlet, to n,nko the Clerk re-
bpo1lsiblo alter hc bud shown that due diligence
had been exercised bs. him would be Infamous,
an hGnd n9t ne 0no H., he % hep T. S
Ut the gentleman from Lce's intluence.
Long Junce, QUO of t.e Prison Commissioners
who has had bis feelings harassed by delayed
npprop5iattons for Joliet md who has been tug
through, was grati1cd to-day BY aeeing the last
veatiga ot LEGISLATION on TINT subject dsposed
Of. Jones has been !ecehy III regard to thcso bills,
and has kept them 10 line.
the Industrial School at Champaign, to pay his
expenses to tho Paris Exposition Is Cu1nmis-
sioner for Illinois, was defeated.
The Conference Colnmittoe reported tho five
bills back TO the House With recommended! !ons.
| The C0mmlttce's recommendations were saopt~
cd, the House recedIMG frun its proposed 10 pcr
cent reductions In oil cases. ard adopting the
| sums proposed. by the Scnnte. While Robson.
Of Fulton, WAS cudcaYor!ny to speak on report
prepared by him, The House rose ia body and
| loWIed him down.
The bill making a'evy for taxes for statc pur:.
poses wns taken u,J and lost. This bill proposed
| to amend the levy by adding 251, GOO to It, The
| bill was then delivered over to the tandcr mcT-
| ctca Vi q Conference Committee.
The Senate amendment reducing tho appro-
priat!on for The eoutAern penltentiary to $500,
| 0U0 was corcurTc1 ia.
Tn tho motfon Of Allen, OF Warren, the bill
regulating tho Chicago Stock Yards IVES called
| up md made special order for 1850. Tho bill
| was subsequently, defeated.
Senator Riddles Chicago PARK bill Was called
up mud passcd with the emergency c'at,se.
Neil moved to take from the table the bill
| approprIating $l,000 TO Senator Archer for
SERVICES before the Court Of Claitns. He made
vehement speech Ia favor of the bill,
claiming tl!at it Hns u righteous
claim for valuable services, and should
be paid. IIc sud the State Ind
been saYcd lnrge SUN OF money, and that wne
another reason why tho bill should pass. An
nsteu,pt was made 10 prevent the measure from
coming up and Trusilcll raised the point Of or
der tlut 1t was now too late to call tbs measure
up. The CHAR decided the point not we'll taken
from which decision On appeal Was taken to tllt
House. Tho decision Of tic Chatr WAS sut
taned. The vote By Which the bf failed K
pass waa rccnnetderctl, mud the bill .was lost.
The General Appropriation bill was taken up
the question being whether or not the Houst
should reccde from lta proposc1 reduction. iii
iiouso refused to rccede. a COMMITTEES O.
Conference wna appointed.