New-York tribune., 1879-05-07
TWO VETOES SUSTAINED.

wv NEIOf-D SOCIAlNEDs
THE SENATE FAILS To PASS TIE CODE OR PRoCEs-
sIoNs BILL OVER THE GOVERNORS VETO.
lFRoM THE REGULAR CORRESPONDENT THE rRIBUSE.l
ALBANY, May 6.-The Senate tried unsuc-
cesstuy to-day to pase the nine supplemental chapters
Of the Code OF Civil Procedure over the Governors veto
The was made almost party question, the
Republicans almost unanimously voting to override the
veto. and the Democrats against IT, II the veto hod
been overcome in the Senate, it was believed
that the Assembly would also override it by
probably an increased majority There was
no debate Senator Edick merely moved
that the bill be passed despite the veto The message
he said, when read the previous week complete
surprise the legislature No such disappTOv0l OF the
COde had been anticipated There not the slightest
intimation before from the Governor that he dis
satisfied with the Code. The did not contain
single new feature u was mere repetition OF veto
message the year before. In his opinion the Governors
actlon was dictated by mulshness. He wondered
dust 20 humor she sefi-bness ~ one man" The
tine question as follows lRepubicans IN Romans !;
Navs-Eee'esine. Good,fn. Harris Jacobs Jones' OAK
lev. j. Z. Fierce RaiHes Turner'S.
Ieay-Dav"lyoft. Eiick. Goe ei, Hicks. Hogdn, Hal
bert. hJhcs, LipDitt Looma, Lynde, Marvin, AlcC1r-
tiny, Murphy. Payne Pomeroy Robertson, Rockwell.
Sessions, Wagner Wagstah. Wendover-2l.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Durshelmer. upon the vote being
announced, SAID This bl ayng failed 10 secure the
requisite number oi votes, Is Ost' II required twenty
votes .O overcome the veto. Senator EdicS moved
that the vsfe be Ied Mr. DOrshe.er ruled that
thai the senate wOud have thrre days within which 10
consider the matter The question has not been raised
many years whether the vote rejecting vetoed O
can be usderld. Tie dbe-t parhamentauans Of
the senate disagree about the matter Or course, uncss
extra votes can be had, 10 Will be useless to
press the motion.
The senate also refused 70 override the Governors
veto OF OIL relative tU parades aud prOCessiOus
Mr.. Harris (kepl said the veto power nad been more
frequently used by the Governor or this state during
the past IeW years than similar power hhh neeu USED
abroad during a century. Mr.. Eccleslne (Dem) sup
ported the veto message. s2vng it the duty aud
prerOgntlve of the Executive 10 use the power. He
cOud reason WHY members or the Grand Army
should have this special privilege granted hrm. whie
other worthy and charitable associations debaTrcd
a similar privilege. Mr. Hughes tDemJ Jh0ugAt there
occasion for tine bill; tile law now permitted
music at military funerals.
Mr.. Mccarthy Repl felt that it was the dntv OF the
Legislature TO erant this privilege asked for by
veterans who had rsked their lives 10 save the Union
Mr. POmeTOv KepD argued tnat the brave fellows who
fought for the Union entitled 10 all honor from the
stare; there Sabbath question about the bhl.
SIR Ranes Dem.) asked what percentage OF returned
Republic. Mr.. POmerOy (Rep) replied that there were
10000 members or the various posts OF the
Grand Army % the Republic. He was not sur
prsed TO ind Democratic Senator'S voting against any
measure 70 honor Union soldiers, living dead. Mr..
Rane- (DemD was not IN favor OF special regulation
Tor any body OF men, and he could not, there
fore, vote Tor the oil. DIT turner (Nepl salu
these men who fought battles and saved the
Union, now tldt they are passing away should De hoh-
bv permitting music the occasion OF their tune
rails. Mr. jacobs (Dem9 said tAis debate was All
Senator'S There Otner large socletessucn as the
AlasOns and the Ancient Order OF HlDcrnlans-and
they, roo, should be granted similar privileges II TINS
Dill passed. Mr. Hogan tDrmJ SAID there were
some around the circle VINO supported Ls D
Win patriotic who stayed at home during tue war;
busy with TAT Government contracts The question was
vetO ana Tssued-yeas, 20; nays 10; not JWO-tIiTds
voting III the affirmative