, 1879-06-17

Enhlt Ht TIC t0nhlRnttft. bel0hRel 70 Lneh;* .u
,eru to be soi ou their sceount. rhss JMdre
'at' that according to the weight Ut evidence y
appeared that this arrangement was Suspended
~ or a9oat Fob. ! 1879, ind, after .,as dats,
he H. relations between tho parties ,,aEr were
ains'''t aiter condaeted IL u'''i rs i weuia bo IN
The rAso nf ahso'utn purchasers af goods, where
the title u1ssed upon delivery to the pllrc1laicr
The Eo1s nm, psraonn nrppstts n H. ,tnse %
to bs uee,ncd his property, subject TO sale ana
.strtbuttnn nn,ong I'LL h,s creditors enualsy. |
llle claim Ut lle cumplnsnauts TO l'o tsh oWhcrs
iron, nem '.ui telr claim to t's prn'
rces Of suelins hail fccn sold bcforo tic aIili.
cn1ton, wo0ii therefore DO fentcd, and the bill
dismissed for want Of equity. |
4 CASH or HARDSHIP. |
This was suit By the First National Bank ".
Two notc4 given by Mrs. King anil Mr. Beebs to
ticurge ". tiage Eur s7.MW. Subsequently, t1lo |
t,otes wern transferred TO the Chicago F'se-l"-
suranra Company, ai,u, thu COMPANY desiring
bank US collateral sec,,rty Without strs. Klng's
When the notes fell due she sent 70 /
the INSURANCE Company tssu drafts for fj,Nn
and *soUl, sesncet!ssiy, snopastnE they stil!
u.e tl,e nionss e taking W tho rauer 4 had
given tho bank. When Mrs. Kings notes fell due
the lnt1uey WINS not 50 applied AMI thu bank.
after having appl!cd on tue suing = haIance in
1lb IL lUf NU}HPHBJ tACAaks ulASlt pun
for the rrmatndur, ciattni.,E lien for tile bat-
nnce on The uotes atn trnst.dccd securing them.
Judge Harlan said tic cass was llar'l QUO, ad
he SHOULD like to Etye Mira. King rcicf, but did
lo'dcr Of The paper In duo course Of busincss,
and I'D one else after tllat was entitled to re-
eclve payment oil tie notcs. Although shb bc-
1fcyed the Insurance Company owhcd The nutes,
could not relieve her. A judgment would,
therefore, be rendered ln iavor Of the bank for
tfc aulotnt claimed. fhr c1ainl t1lat thy 1'sur.
nncs Company was authorized By tho bank 10
collect tllg money duo to Il WIS not sustained
by tllu evidence.
FRAUDULENT coNyErAxozs.
The cnso VI Kaufman IS. DlAnks was suit to
set aside MI alleged fraudulent conyc:aEce By
Blanks to la daughters TO binder and tclny. Ills
creditors. tudgn HARLAN hell quoting from
conveyance was merely eoforable, mud secret
trust ind confidence existed for the benefit of
the grantor. 1t was void not only against pse-
rsac1st hut Subsequent creditors, for It was !i
such case eonstnuons fraud. md might actually
eperotn az such as we'll tn, reference to
debts contracted after ns bcforc the conveyance.
The evidence In tue present case showed con-
clusfvely thu. Blanks made tlic conveyance In
question with the lNlmedIate object OF defeat
.ng claim ngainst him IN {aye. oi fhe Assignee
vi TIT: Chicago Fire-11sHraNGc Company. Tic
conveyance wAs ouly cuioglbl1 atth On Il secret
trust A,l waY void, Allll must be SIT aside md
MEEEEG EcHuEGE0 I'll IAFUE O1 LIE EuA}lIAanAuts
TIE OTHER CASES.
The cases OF Ryau vs. Young, Murphy vs..
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad Com.
pany, Belts vs. Rice urI Goodrich Transports
tan Company wGrc continued for briefs to be
Glg1.
srENCgn's Address,
The whercabouts Of D. u. Spencer, tic former
:. matter OF sorrowful iuteraat to n large unn-
bcr Of deEosturs In TINT bank, but yesterday
they wcrc officially mpdo known. Soon after
the appointment Of Judge Otis as Receiver hs
nropcrty, standlnr III tllu ,lan,o OF Mrs. Susan
A. SPENCER: Lots "a and =, Block L. IN
spr!nger's Subdivision q tic N. Is q the y. II
# tas n 4 Of IT. tue os..r n W < 9! S,s%cs. Sec.
to his wife as MI ante-nuptsal usrer,''est
Nov, u, 1S7lj the marriage following Dec. II,
and tlebilt charged TINT Ut The time he owed
ttlc bank $500 000 und tl.at the conveyance vas
fact, ulld directed the conveyance 10 10 eet
asido unl thc property conveyed to y. D.
Spencer, sub}rct to Judgment for $500 os.3t In
favor OF tho b4nk.
Aldis, til attorneys for Mrs. Susan Il. Speurer
tIfed i petition bcfore Judge Fnrwel, setting up
that she Ind never bten served with process IN
the suit, mn, had only heard Of It Indirectly. aDsl
antl 10 tilc her answer. Leave was given. Mfstl
The answer aIed immediately. Tic uetitlon
| Is sworn tu on tho .stll Of Aiavs fSiu, bctoro
| Chapman Coleman, Second Secretary Ut LeEa-
in lcr answer, Mrs. Spencer admits that
Judge Otis WIS appointed Receiver Ut the Suits
Savings Institution. that afterwards f,e Eecoy-
rye1 Judgment IN an attachment suit for S'9,-
nttnci,1,,cut ,l,e aooyc lots III HYDE Park were
| aexed. She also a1!ntts that these tots were
conveyed 10 ller Ia November, 1876. undcr All
ante.nuptial asrcun,ont; ti,at she 1narried ln