, 1879-08-22

person who might havc heen caictl, anil that
WAS tho alslcs, Mrs. 'Fhornns. Mr.. Hall was tlIc
nerson wlo tl.s'red the truth to vone out, anil
he SHOULD have called her. MoYcts IN Mr.. Hall
was b. hts anxiety to yet rlti uf TINT W0lnhH,
and tu enter into ticw rctasi'na there were nut
wanting persons who cntlpavurr'1 to nsstst HIN.
aa to gyc testimony a., Witch ,u r,aee hts
eon wl0 was tn DO that, hit there were passages
in her letters Which wcFo utterly Inconsistent
With her responsibility, unless i VIA true tint
r. a hai s1''s enlsefy a. 'st s
lnsbssd a,mi the separation VI Mrs. hull fro.n
her husband drew ihe two Women together.
The letters tho former wrotc ,wcrc of tia
Witt wl"io: II an thankful il fancy lint
,ou ilo at ti.nvs forget your grieyous.
truubles," and, "Do not lei the wirkcdnc.s "f
Others oseruheim yuu;' mud yet they were ns's
wro.c tosc letters she knew tint Mrs. ilall was
committing adultery with Frnnk Richardson.
1ln liuted lie Jury would conde0ln lit: conduct
HI"l tvlcsIcc Of Mrs. 1rauMer. wtit', r!len us,
every thing nuss!l,le to SINK her former !htses*
into LcustIs of IhfanX nnil Ttcc. Nhat could
ilc Jury say after The certificate Of Atr. HALL ~
February, tS10, TINT bis wife was pure. nob'e
Two lut,t't's utter iI,c dny IL February on which
ihnt lgttcr was written hY Mr.. Jlull. aiui tHD
DAYS nf,er lI!e day on which It WIS supposed
lint tl: foul alatery tonIi nlaca III Salisbury
eL9ICkA ItIp 4!hll HcN% ~ Htl1
Hiaycd with her chilli ever s'nce. Thurs cafne III
June u thu same ycar Mss Richardson, tl,r Bsstcr
Of Frank Richardson, nINi it WIS asttrlcd tllnt
while his sister WIS with Mrs. Hull Trunk Rich
a ycr4ct to TINT effect, hu YVES sire, would not
he given nv tllr Jury. Mr. Frunk ltIeLurll-
son. Young tnaf, Of VI ycara of uEr.
olten visited Mrs. i!ulI. bat would they
lad committed adul.ers With lnlr u il years
| VI ngt wiiU wus III d s,li EtatG III health! lln
thought t,ut. Therefore, considering tlsc wl'uIc
| 1acta Of the case, he asi;e1 t!ntn what; they
! wnuI think 0f tue life Ut Mrs Hall. liz suit
United HAT II wns not tue case u natura' ittl-
psd!mcnt, but, The the other hand, oL uatusai
dIs!tieIinntlon. -.
sir. llall knew a'1 atong that TINT had been
submitted oh that punt that Mrs. lial hal COIN
pctely answered the allegations ot nrr husband.
Uur:,I. the progress of this casc lie had teci
tie dctc,,dpr uI Mr. Hall us much ~ he flul
to save tllc tHpvth!inE shaule uil ds1rAce WHICH
would fail uIrun Atr. Hull should lie hr succeks.
lul Ill the casc. lie hui described Air: Hail ns
he wus,--klnd, aifeytountc, AMI tctdcr.-but
lhera had been tgns vi deterioration VI char-
ac&cr III the progyess af llle case III court. Al
u ycafa Ut aye, ali,i ultgr nIamy years. duris.!
| WHICH he bail Not kHU"n u wuniai, he hnd
thought fit 10 prosecute ths suit. Nothing
wo,li1 prevent hn, Us lv stated, in:proscediny
with 1t; not eyGu thu terrible hhatne whlen
must fall nroh the poor thuthtr In
tic gage 1E Ills success. IhAt consideration n!nt
the u.t,er points which had brought bpio:t then,
should huye made him brtME hls body into sub
iectton, ulIl not intltct sU terrible blow uDt,tl
ills wife. lie asketi the turf to gpArI Air. Hall
lr0n tilc suecess which would bt fatal to Ills
character, to hIs spiritual tutuenee. Mtnl to Ills
pus.lon. lie askcd t.,eu, IL SPARE his clfent.
who lad told Sir. Hail ycaEs ngo that Ills sue.
cess In rcnlng tllr marriage TIT would brn:.
lin nU light u.ll spatc him no burden, nnd llc
asked tlctl Mlsu to sparu ttlnt tnotIer, VIM AMd
but tic one child. wtlu,il she 4ad ,lrscd through
ycurs III trial, II anything could 1layG pre.
Yeulrd Newman iiaIi from tlsc coursc hu hai
tuRcn ie should have thought It would have
bcen tho memory Of that tn:i whu, With tuy.
iilg eytlpatny, Gayp lin hts chlId tntrty-six
years agu, ullt. Mhobc sainty life had been Eai
by Mr.. ilal should ever he l!lB guile through
itlc. In conclusion, hc bev4scd trlr Jury to .ty4
tte tnrts Ut tho ease tnrir careful cuilsuera4,o.
nul u acyu,t his ctgnt Ut t,e grave Charge
male against lcr.
(ar. Willis, Oil passing from the court at tllc
conclusion u his address, waa scizs1 DY thu
liam. hy Mrs. Halt, who wura1ls x!ouK II, at
locked III, 1uiu Ills lace with smile. linMcIi.
utrly n!,erward she sGc.llcu uluen affected ullL
| wept.)
+ Mr. Kempo tl!cn rose to address tile jury on
| behail ut ihe correspondent.