National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-03

smith vs.. Meister; argued and submitted Wilson
VS.. Wilson; divorce granted Brooke w. Barnes
injunction dissolved and bill dismissed. Robinson
vs. Robinson; appearance OF absent defendant or
dercd, Ice VS.. Starr; witness ordered TO answer
questions. McGraw VS.. MoGraw; Leander Van
Riswick appointed guardian ad liem.
CRIMINAL CoURT-JusrfCR HAGNER. Mr.. Seaton
Perry was excused for the term, on PHYSICIANS GER
tfcate of disability, from service on the petit jury
and talesman ordered to llll his place, Herman
Brandt, indecent assault upon Emma Floith not
guilty. William " s. Wilson, ombezzlement of
Government funds; nolle pros. entered Fanny
Pettis, larceny; molle pros entered EDWARD Mar
low. alias Babe Hawkins, perjury on tho witness
stand in the Criminal court; Orragned and pleaded
not guilty. George Brown, perjury the plea of not
guilty was withdrawn by the consent Of the court,
md motion 70 qunsh made on the ground of in;
formaity in the Indictment this was overruled
and an exception noted. Jury sworn and rospited
until to-day.
ASSIGNMENTS ron TO-DAY.
SUPREME COURT OF THE Observation-Disclosures
CARTIER AND JUSTICE JAMEs-No 1872 United states,
use Of Wilson, VS.. Ames 1885, wcch ,ySs,
Kelly. use Of 4Lebefman' VS.. Wright 1856, Dis,
rlct Of Columbia VS. Brndiordi 1877, strong VS.. Latto
1873, Fleming vs. lIillyer 139, National Metropolitan
Bank VS.. liltz; ilI Washington Gas Light Com
pany vs.. District of Columbia; 1i8, Bayne VS., Mo
Blair IA, Dexter VS.. Norris li5 Morse Arms
Manufacturing Company VS.. Winchester Repeating
Arms Company.
CIRCUIT Court No. 1-JusTIcE wYLrE.-No. Al,
Archer y Paneoast Manufacturing Company ys.
shSRheTa g. strong vs. wOc M G9ameS g
mnistrarix, vs. Baldwin, ct al. 49, Polkinhorn VS..
Dyer ct al 427 Parker VS.. McChcsney 1875, Wall VS..
RObnson; 1870, Kennebec Ice Company vs.. In
land Il Scaboard Cunsting Company; il3, Wash
ngon vs. Clark; Ii5, Seal VS.. SailUr AL, United
States VS., Nation ct a.; 4i0, Lanahan US. Young
ct al; i5l, Smith Il Wimsatt vs.. Long ct al, gar
nishees ij5, Pettet Il Drip vs. Brown; 49, seldner
" Son W. Bleber ct al.; i63, Holmes w. Kirk;
167 B0sshor Il Co. VS.. Hilli 400 Stanton vs. Wroe.
CIRCUIT Court No. 2--JusrIcE Cox.--No. 81,
strong VS.. District of Columbia; $40, Childs VS..
Marks ct al, Appeal D0cket-No. 90, lIolM.
manvs. District of Columbia; ITO, Bennett
VS. wilson Regular Caendar-No. 16, Armstrong
Marks ct al; DDS Washington Market Company VS..
Hoffman; 6S Huber ct NIX. vs. Teuber ct ux.; 62,
Tenber ct lux. VS.. Huber ct ux.; 81 Tucker and
sherman VS.. Boston; 100, Clark vs. Schcller and
| Iihkord; 1872 Lemont VS.. w. u q. II. II.
| Co..; 49, Archer vs. Pratt; lSS, Reside, agent
French vs. Mcpherson ct al; 2ll, Davis Sons VS..
Smoot;2lS Liebbechutz vs. McNall; go, Patterson
Mosler Do, District of Columbia VS.. Forsyth Dog
Rogue VS.. Cropey; 49, ONeal VS.. District of Colum-
bin; $50, Wheeler vs. johnson; 232 Northern Liberty
Market Company vs. Killian; 2i2, Truesdell, exc
| Hyatt vs.. futile: IG5 Wagner Il Co. VS.. Benedict
| ct nj.
Equity CoURT-JUsTIcE MACARTHUR. M l.
Cox vs. Mcpherson; g. Van Riswick VS.. Spalding;
| z, Riddle VS.. Wright; o. Campbell VS.. Kennedy; IL
Hutchinson VS.. Smon 10, Freedman's Savings and
| Trust Company VS., Nandenburgh Is, Smith VS.
Smith; II, Rick VS. Neitzy l5 Davis VS.. Huyck
| 10, Gorzlcr VS.. Kennedy.
CRIMINAL COURT JUSTICE HAGNER - George
Brown burglary and larceny; James Baylor, Zach.
arah Baylor and Millie Baylor arson; Frank
Eisingcr, assault with intent to kill; Herman
Brandt, assault and battery.