The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1856-1888, 1879-11-01
Supreme Court,-October Term. A. D. 1879
CHIEF JUSTICE HARRIS, PRESIDING.

CHIEF JUSTICE HARRIS, PRESIDING.
His Excellency Edward Preston Attorney General, for
the Crown.
The King vs.. Tin Vat teh)-smuggling Opium. Case
called, but the Prisoner who was out on bail, did not APP
pear; his bondsman Alan appeared however. and stated
unknown, and submitted to the Judgment of the court
800 forfeited on the Bond, which was paid accordingly.
The King VS.. Halak (w)-Perjury; Continued from July
Mr.. BickertOn. stated that since the last Term Of the
Court she has been afflicted with Paralysis and was un-
able 10 speak, though she was able to hear, and that she
desired to withdraw her plea of not guilty and enter 8
plea of guilty. The Court in view of the affection of
defendant and that her paramount has been acquitted
the administration of justice would be aided if she was
allowed to go upon her own recognizance, to appear
The King VS.. Naiwi tl-Perjury. N6tt Prosequf entered.
The King VS.. W. P. K~ahema-Perjury Plea not guilty.
Tried by a Hawaiian jury who returned a unanimous
verdict of guilty. The Court sentenced the Prisoner to
costs sS7.45 Maheiona for the defendant.
The King vs., J. r: Silva, j., $, k9anasna and NarcissGs
having pleaded Not Guilty. and one of them being a for
together by two juries, Native and Foreign. The foreign
jury returned a verdict Of Not Guilty for the defendant
Guilty for the other two defendants and the ,6 prisoners ps1e
R. F. Bickerton for silva and Kaanaana.
The King VS.. Lsamaik1hiRi G11PeEjury; Pr Prisoner some,
on m behalf Of the ,, prisoner GoTnt in 5d m Litigation f Of punishment %Iisdner T.
imprisonment at hard labor until the last day of this
Term. N.,u % r;ec.mer+ Nev rr,.,
Tried by a Hawaiian jury, who returned q verdict for the
Plaintiff, restoring the lands to Makea without damages
i. Haiokshiki and Kaulukou for Defendant.
deceased, VS.. S. Ka~anAana-Replevin of a Horse. Appeal
from Intermediary Court. Tried by a jury and a verdict
KAluahinenui Cw) VS.. Daniel Echeverria ct al-Discon-
The King vs.. All sing-selling Liquor witheoutL icence.
Appeal. Tried by a foreign jury who returned a verdict
the lower court was confirmed, namely to pay a fine of
John Kspu VS.. ]. \. KsiaiEawahs@Action on Promis-
sorry Note. Tried by a native jury who returned a YER
plaintiG and A. s. Hartwell for defendant. Exceptions
Kahiuka * ct al VS.. Hikaalahi Hebron ct Affect
ment. Tried by a mixed jury who returned a unanimous
ton reserved for the full court. which may yet upset the
verdict. A. S. Hartwell for plaintiffs; Preston and Brown
oct. 18th. Crowningburg VS.. crowningburg-Decree
Kekuaho9uiu wi VS.. Ahia-Continued till last day of
Akaniki Cw) VS.. william J-ohnson-Petiton dismissed.
KamOohOowalewale t) VS.. ongnee Ani-continued till
Naspuelua Ok vs. Keliiwahanaku w)-Decree of di-
yorce granted.
Kainoa WI VS.. Kaialoa-Decree granted.
Oct; 18th: MikaIa Gw) vs.; AhiamDeSEee granted
oct 22d. Miriam Meek vs.. John Meek, jr.-COntinued
Henry S. swinton, jr, VS.. NJ. X. s-winton-Divorce re-
Oct. 25th. Kauwe WI VS.. Lui Kekua R)-Decree of
HoApiii * VS.. Kaulana wl-Decree of divorce refused,
for counsel's fees of respondent.
granted ran ted Na W. {. Ho i H' For hbeliant. . "i'of''
William Brown VS. Mary kaipo-Deeree of divorce re-
oct. 27th. MeIe Keokokalani VS.. George D. Robinson
cSGTf and q s Sos for esounaei's fees Sssp0naen' pay COSTS Il
KekuahoouIu wi VS.. of divorce granted.
Mana * VS.. Kepola (wl-Decree of divorce granted.
The King vs.. Hale-Larceny. Prisoner pleaded guilty,
labor u f f one TeaT and to pay w a fine in Of 81 and costs s' 81 a5.
KaahOomaau Ok vs.. James Campbell-Ejectment. Dis
MaIaihe VS.; Anee SchlIAssHmpsit Default entered,
certain the amount due upon the coming in of his report,
that judgment be entered for the plaintiff for the amount
so found due. Preston and Brown for plaintiff.
J. Mott Smith VS.; S. I. pole ct al, assignees of strehz.
gued and submitted. \. s. Hartwell for plaintiff; S. B.
Dole for the assignees.
lua-Assumfstt.. Mr.. Justice McCully read the decision
of the Court in Ms case, finding for % the defendant 1nSi ra
the decision of the Coat affirming the former Judgment:
the Ahupuaa of Pulehunuf~Appeal from Circuit Court,
"a Judicial Circuit. Case argued and submitted, and on
25th Judgment rendered confirming the decision of the
Hatch for the applicants E. Preston for the appellants.
Before CHEZ Justice Harris.
oct. 18th. Lahela VS.. Akau (ch,-Eiectment. Tried
Castle & Hatch for plaintiff Preston and Brown for de-
cree $500 5g sSp,r nv IN a : iafHsa Fl aoTo. and C ordered the defen-
dAnt to pay $50 a month to the hbellant and the costs of
Oct. goth. Antoine Levaro vs.; Charles M~ahOe-TrespArs
who returned a verdict for the plsintih-damages SIS.
The King VS.. c. F. Brown-on the defendant,s own
motion, the Court ordered this case continued till next
term.
AEowai CHI vs. Lu Pong Cehl-Trespass. Continued
Chung Hoon Ceh) VS.. Lu Pong-Trespass. Continued
iii < NtIm.
Nsholowaa * VS.. waiahA (w)-Ejectment. Judgment
Of possession for the plaintiff is ordered to be entered by
reason of the default Of the defendant. A. 5. Hartwell /
for plaintiff Kalaaukane for defendant. /
John Kapua VS. J. y. Observation-Disclosures for new
trial. Motion argued and submitted.
Jennie Wallace vs.. A. L. W~Allace-Decree of divorce
granted herein. Castle * Hatch for Ibellant.
c. Akans VS.. Mala-Decree of divorce granted herein.
W. c. Jones for Iibellant-
Raymond ( wiltshire VS.. S. B. Dole and W. L. Wilcox,
lssignees Of Strehz, Observation-Disclosures under sec
lao TO 1143 of the Civil Code. Case argued and sub
nitted, and on the 25th Judgment rendered for the plain
IFS. 4. f. Bickerton for plaintiffs S. b. Dole for as
Oct. 21st. Ursolda Sherman VS.. Charles ~Long-Eject-
nent. Tried by a foreign jury, who return a verdict for
he plaintiff for the nine acres of land claimed, and dam
800. Castle & Hatch for plaintiff Preston for de-
endant.
KAhuika ct al. VS.. HikaalAni Hebron ct al.-The Court
delivered its decision, setting aside the verdict of the
ury and ordering judgment to be entered for the defen-
ants.
AIAkea VS.. NaIua ct al.-Ejectment. The Court render
d decision in this case. giving Judgment for the defen-
ants non OJstdHte reTidict0. Castle < Hatch for plaintiff;
Iolokahiki and J. L. Kaulukou for defendants.
The Court having submitted to the members Of the Bar
sine die,