, 1879-01-29
hentlrd The character Of Col. Kettt's request ts
completely ~ he miatnok the mode Of eicstipE
n Nt tufN ~ fntHH HYfLH

hctlef aef1uatntAhc0 Win lllat GGHLfHaH Had
impressed The 1npcs with The conviction lhat he
was incapab1o of pnrsulnE any inject BY mean
or undrrhnnh methods. flu admitted tin! Ills
reputation lad not euffcrct from thus publ lea
ton Of tho alleged lIhe. but tl,at lln ia not FREQ
from the chararteristlc weakness Of thu South
crn planter might be inferred from ILLS persist"
cnt prosecution Of his suit, which indicated now
krrnly hc resented the prctt,lsion tint bis
ierma which were nlsa applicable 10 himself;
The moderation, with which n Northern Jury had
appraised tllc tlanagc which he had sustained
might contribute to lhr educational IrtrcAs nf
which ha atnl ncn like him sttiod 90 nIucll III
need.
APPELLATE counr DECISIONS.
Tic Appellate Court met yesterday afternoon
and nn1.tt,nrrsl their decisions In the following
cnsca:
IIv .tnlec pleasants:
70. ttsiiingtnn ~. .---: affirmed.
~. 1tlfc w. Heed; hllirntst-
III. ls1rc ys. blank; affirmed.
III. Ctty W. Aetlwin; affirmed.
II. flInterheruer ve. Wcndlcr. lscrer.etl and
rctnuhdctl, 'lllc uoint al which It was reversed
WAS bcsause the fe,url fntleh to s!mw tlat i!Ie
plaintiff ha. tnn.lc tile pro1'er demand beInre
6rtugfng Ills ettt III forelblu rttry md Autaier.
IL. 1s .'nI1son 'r1s' "a: johnson; affirmed.
11s. farh ~. EIgrnn,an: atlrtnc.l.
III. Duvnuy vs. O'Cohncli; affirmed.
Morris VI. Kcan; affirmed.
40. Bliss -. t'attlner; reversed and remandcd.
Nv Lutlcr Murphy:
II. Wth"wsky vs.. neckcrt; affirmed, THIS
,s Mhs au't "! @ ~ p.SIa! ot,'i'' G'FeM ny W.
treasurer !" an oa,l.s G!to%s LtHIge. rlIH snlel
| wcr1 not cohrluslvo rs tu ihr amount III lila
shsln1e, but thy Court het-follotslnR tl'rir d..
sis,o. ~ a ~ .auG" eIho ~ "" !..se.y .s sans
| |rn1M tn,pearlslnR tho rvllenvc u lis Ilouks.
~ ,t,. nn1nt'el. VI. L'nsolh' m' ainIliei.
r. & i,Tseffon fo W. -. urana; as'iGa. ;,;a
~ a.uo its... y. -. s,. I"a 49,. a1.sneu. an,1
n' :. axs,, ~ p.v tos aoea1 ~
!niis"Yeo,es. n. suf' ,t.; - lat'mt "aiSt.me.ns 10
ceita'h streets Ill !ayae In1R. ihe assess-
n'en. % W. W. "t.,rr IT. r',"Me ,..ms ,,t,t, an oft,
..'u ~ a.,,a Il. ~ T., nmn m,e" ,r' ~
xannssnnsfe III, M ssasEnateM ~. sssessment nt
ou.vsso. y, ~ ~ 4" ,a.s ,"st ~. ~ sns uss
Suspaus CIV, ps'nR auGu .of .no nIposo ot
,ia, naHna .s ~ H.. ",or1nsI.. 10 r,nl, sIts 70 .e
l,ud pail ior re- teSerat yeaT1 ago, is tonr. held
uat tnu'u nut " u"Hr. peSluae lHc osu'Hhhee
.'ta i,ot eaut"ts'e 4' H., s, n suea power Mas
eNeh w a!ussees; ~ w.. o'.'Eave WIS tllelr
,, "S ~, s r.. tmnryo,1n. ~ e ~
aao. 1ils iu,lument q tl's Court below !cny-
fore esrrrct.
| H. Ntr{nsosl, ye pcopte.
| ii. Tayior rs. sa.nc
iU,. Fairticl.i vs. Snme; a1l affirmed. These
nses st,y n o te act ot ~ Ky b
rui,ec1!on Il liz taxcs whci, IL Ind faiied 10
rot1eck under Bill h" Tie Court mid tiey la,
listeue.i tu efnt,orate arru,nrnts in t,,n rnsrs'
hut had r4uclict tlte conclusion that tho law was
not unconat'tut'aua', and that tlla proceeding
under II wns warranted. They felt Glad to be
ntlc to uceiaru the profecuiuE legal, an!
they alcn lclt ~ wn6 eGttthble. The
assessment VA ea ioT Sll,0oo,on Of taxes
tnr the wears 1873 ana 1h!l. VI this amount
x,N" :,n !Iau ossm pa,a " ~ ~ .nosa uutitui
tha taYr. had sn!nssd ,,,n aamc n,os e".Io" NJ
ihoss wbaio III NM, ti,ry .,',,r,'t H. No. tt,nir IL
.hurr. Ths authorities wern ,,niform I'M tl'..
art uf 1871 WA not illegal, a.,l tic ic,ison Of
liz CAN'T below conftT,niug tl,c asscssmcnt
wnn,I @ II,.. ha nf,,rmen. 'A"'' '''' "''s'''e''
i'll iiur.i Va. Sfnrple: reyorscd md remondc,,.
TIL. .,a. sr;t H. annica a,,os, ~ a,'n;in,,t
nnrsnnr 81 Sus ne XIII; h. i liz ~. ~
nnnii1.n~ a.sncnton' 'iIH snnt,1"n haH ,nn,lo y.
M nv.rcmct xti, the maKrr for liz 1 eHt.n.inn ,u
~, W ,dr,cnt IN cnnstIcrs,lnn ~ II" n,v,t ~
" nant t,,ars. ~ taay ~. payngn' ot
o.sa, ns a,H .m.ta,rsH ;r A,,n,is.s ,,1, ~
It ~ a,a orr.'s ~. pt aa ,.s.
.s - sre whr n H. focts "I.1eS T.
liz n'ca wrrc trur. Il rm,i1 M. h. ~n' ..