New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1879-04-03

Mr. Remington should want to sell The type. imposing
stG1es Ell Of Ge In nr nSee e OF at least thirty DAYS
Neao- York, Oct q, 1875 T. ~ W.ffoCK
In presence OF f. W. Hawley.
The Witness Coontinuingl-On Friday October o. !
saw Mr. Talmage in the City Hall Park. said; you
are Just the man want to see' lie respohue" III ."
most the same words, and said; am just aoou'
buying The Christian at Work. won't hold you TO your
promise to work a year for nothing VIII give Won
SO 900 the first year. and if the profits warrant II VIII
pay you more" He seemed greatly pleased ana sa'u
Odd you see him on Mondays Al did; al tne
Aston House put paper IN his hands
Tie following paper was ldentin a ana Feau q ,o-o
In consideration OF the fact that j. n Hallock is in
tending 20 clear the Christian at Work entirely from
debt aud put it upon healthy, cash-paying basis 90
tnrtbermore Of the sum OF two thousand dollars $4,000
TO be paid bv HIM to me in equal monthly lnstalmehr
as heretofore as editor exclusively of The Christian at
HOrk for one year from this date
NEGOTIATIONS AT AN END.
Odd he sign iti Ale did not. He said If 1t had
been put before him two weeks before no would have
signed once AS 1t was he would give me an answer
the next day. | was surprised at what he said
O-When did you discover that the negotiations were
at an end A-The next morning. Mr.. Hawey camo TO
nv Office and said that d.. Tmage had left the paper
and we'd me his vaedctOry. gave orders TO stop
the edition. excited. IL DIR. Iaimage likes ehthu-
s1asm he woud have seen II then.
Q-When did you hear from DI. Talmagef A-ADout
. O'Clock received note from him.
This put III evidence, as follows; - ,o-o
DEAR Mr. HAIIOCK: have considered the of,r yon
made the editorial chair OF The Chr1Stian az hWh
IN case YOU purchase it, aud have concluded tuHt III N
~ Yo oGs5 ETC. / De WITT TALMAGE.
Ing. | going gave llm a piece OF my MIND Dut
dIi say much. lie did not attempt TO JUSTLY nun
self but Said something about being Wiling To IedNeH
Old YOU make HIM any Offer Al might have
IN II Iupu hay civ
haye sneh a thins hapPen' -, ,,,or s,ooo, Ayes
Q-Ias Dr. Talmage ever visited you sncei A
Yes yeaI after on August "a 1877. he sent note
asking me to meet HIM al the Aston House On August
81 be 10 mouse and said &i he wanted to come
back edit d OF The chris ian al Work. He remarked
that we would "make II VIM" Tne next morning
received letter from HIM.
The following letter was then put In evidence:
l SOUTH OXFORD-sT. Friday.
DEAR Mr. HALLOCK: II co yenieht would Ike to
have you call al house about o'clock this evening,
that We may conclude The saon opened last
Friday. nave also something additnnM TO saw Please
The witness continued l went, aud he said mat in
addition to working the first year for nothing be would
put 1t ID writing that during the second year Jhr saihiE
should De only nominal. so that could have hold on
Q-Did you accede to the propositions A.-No, sir.
CHARGES or FAISEHOOD.
Mr.. Crosby read from copy OF The Adrance state
mcut signed BY SIR. COrwin aud Dr. Tamage, pronounc
ing statement made by The witness false in part and
false a whole"
To a statement published by M in The Christian at
Work, written lmnedatey after DT. IaImage's uutr-
having uc sold out from under nm To publisher OF
q Unitarian paper, mtuatin- that an 'tOrt had been
carry win IT, bus thai toe goods could not
be delivered. Ny son was al IN IiDeI"Cc "Iieh ING
statements made, and WHOM he came home he told
me OF ihcm a. rhce UttrtVu ivi3 WHrn ~, I ~
The Christian at York. II related 10 the inter-
view OF "icu have mere teellled. Ii was absolutely
Tac witness va, asSsd to identity COPY Of The Ad
lo4ur u the Tthernacc relation TO ms separation
nom T1e Christan at Work, published IN The 1drance,
was offered "a Evidence AMI vas admitted circular
letter, ,lgned By the publishers OF me Adrdnee.
in relation to the saue matter. Us
these as evidence that Dr. Taimaee circulated and
Permitted to be circulated ny those closely associated
win INN statements which he knew 10 he false"
Mr.. Crosby also offered IN evidence letter from an
elder Of tie tabernacle III relation to DE- Idmases
withdrawal Both papers were ruled out AFTER long
debate
CROSS EXAMINATION OF Mr.. HAILOCK.
The cross-exauination was conducted by Mr.. Willard.
Q-Wnen Dr. Taiuage made YOU the offer To edit the
paper for one veal tor nothing If you should buy the
paper did you accept the Oherl A-NO; did not pur-
chase the paper that afternoon.
Odd you consider that the offer lasted forever
A-Yes; believed he bound by it long lie
permitted ms to go on with the negotiations without
warning me tLat ne intended to withdraw II.
O.-But yOu released MN from tlc OffeIi Ayes; /
released him from the Offer 70 WORK for nothing on the
Did he accept thIs oGcrl A.-Not at that time.
Ht'' said he wou # ialk with lie dgaln on monday
ODD Won cons ger that he wa. bound Dy his former
offer after had released MIN from It Al under
STOOD i'm To assent 10 proposition and considered
INN bound by every moral Obligation TO remain the
editor The Christian al Work or else to warn me be-
fore paid my $4,000 Tor 1t. Emphatcaiiy) think
any honest man wOuld have done So lDerisve laugh
"A STOLEN SUBSCRIPTION LIST
O. You have spoken of "a stolen subscription list"
How do YOU know that the list had been stolen Al
knew that Il haG been, because Dr. lalmage
became connected with The Adrance that paper
sent to all our subscribers. and the
list retained Ii was evident our list had been
of you know II You can give the for your
knowledge. You know wbTt mean A. with cm-
phasi-)-Aud you KNOW VIVA mean. me AdgdHce was
sent alter DR. Talmages connection Win It, 10 all my
subscribers. one or my subscribers in France wrote
ne about #, and said "sh'h things as those III France
we should call dl ShOucst."
Q.-Do you know that Dr. Tamage furnished the list
Q.-You lh.uk he might have told some one else 10
doug tiugs-iDdirectly. am morally certain that he
caused 10 sent am certain OF this from tho facts
MR.. TAIMAGLs PLEDGE.
ON your interview with Dr. Talmage OF October G.
1876. did he intimate that he would accept your offer
Alt he wasn't going on with me us editor, why didn't
ne say not let on and purchase the psper4
O-You supposed he meant to close the matter on
Monday If no ever closed i'll Al supposed he would
accept the offer Monday; he was pledged to be my
editor.
Q-But you released him' A.-You say released
him say that | only raised his salary.
Q.-But il was release; dd you not mean 1t? 4.
tEnI phatically)-No; did not mean IT, meant 10 say:
DO not hold To agreement to work Or nOtn-
ing and / Will pay you 81 OCO year for your work"
O.-Wnen DR.. Talmagu refused TO sign your contract
on Monday, and SAID, " If yOu had shown This to me
week ago | would have signed il VIII give you
answer tomorrow what did you say A-Sothing.
did good deal of thinking, but pected HIM to sign
II the next day. considered MIN mOrny bound be
nv editor IN the strongest lf had given
the slightest mint that ne going away, would not
have bought tho paper bought 1t because 1t was DE-
Talmages paper.
O-i1avc you sworn that Or. Tamage fold any false
hoods in connection with bis Withdrawal from your
pauer1 Al willing 10 swear II now. Kisses in
many paris OF tue house.