The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1879-11-06

wore nbo,u ~ Dno hnrrels Of pork 100 600 nOe
=, co., ,,,,,z ,,,
pounds Of moat an'' '''o'o,o'' p"ui''ia"' lafa
tho totnI value Of which may be- estimated MT
.,n,gnnnn rEl,, snin,n,nt, ,,r b,,, ~,
$500 t'''-'
| Oetaher NJ war@ about 33t,0oi barrels 81 pork.
| I'm f,nn 0,o ,,n,Il,let or meat and 92,nJ0 nOD
,h,,i,t,l ,,l,,, r. Yhtrl, ,,,t
60 -" 49, go ''''
| h'NHstifint@d IN as f,oh."'o II" Rh'a't''''E
iii NV r,elrfrt e. tt,oiagn fnt1a GIL dfuee hlI4
y f,,Ii,5,rf, ,,, n,,st t@y.I,n tua5,ti,5 wore
i#'AfH '''
about ttlhA' hutrlt 81 lat". "s"'s'' 'h1N'&' ~
| tn.,ot ANA rfD UID iirrGng 81 lard the total
.s,,,i, N ,,,,i.l, n,,s n, ..lim4to1 nj nl,nut
| .,,,,ul1
| s"'.s'"."Nft
Fh@Gh,'ag" Gnnlneteial Hu'let'G says
| Mo nnn.,n Improaeian l,,ovatla arn"ng pa"I-
| 6rs an4i operators tn trbyi4lona iIrNt tho auu
ply ~ hogs for wilitHr packing will In htnpl" t"
| n"n ~" relnlrYtn"ii'a ~ ~" 'ra'i"t fap'Nu''F
u -" 'a'n,hs - ;t't,na l
tl'''' t't m 1917, ~ 49,, H. tittl
i,,l' VI, ,l,at ,rI,na ,rlfI hn ,rrnpnlnr ,,tpb
nbv moro SO IMAM ior several aansom4 past, rtn
rrop If hpga IL Il llt,ntnl nnn though noi ge,a
raly eouadarad oSnnasivn md thu equality tn
| usually good f"r Tie e"aann "fthe yon, Fat n
err arn dtEr"a"' I" forward thou nii ~ lre"y
nhh ,hn renAip'R gro lt'foPluk. ~ corn
,on n'a N'1' a'.n,an ~ 800, a,''', ~, ~
,'n m'5'' -, ,,h nv, r aa1' ,,aea. I'm q
cow rnv sartinua lin, f,ost hn,nagnl thn corn
INV, aliplnlv pnI Il t,attinn j, it w,.a gathered
In n soft stntn hut iIlhsn rnpn,f, nro oSnnp-
tlouRl. Unlnsa I'LL inaleniinnA fail. tho outlook
f"r hogs IL favorable lar ~ anllrgnd fanEan
Wnik " u" III nhhahoi. III lh'leie'Hi p'o9"tl
~ Nupoi''i l.u'aN
NEW ENGLAND '"ilnN SllNNEh4. h"H
inil NiNNlllAai. tl'Ipnl ~ I've hMn' znni1lla
u'elhg ~ Inc Now fhG1and ,n''nl Manu-
ih"inrols Aaa"ra'tnt Wns hn'h t",aay ~ The
inall'll'" q i"ti''hioRS,l ~ ,hi@ ''y. h'fa
was " very htHN thNteinlhit'" ana Glt"b IN
t"'eRt WtH h'Hui'es'oI ~ thA matters MS
'naaNh. ..,
NO lirRl a,'t'lNeR colslnr'NH WaS 1'iAL OF
1nt.nn 49,. y iapoii na',e pia@t't"n ~
MI :" liiitah = ''',il'''e'9. "' '.NW'sf"n ct'i-
hitH =. wv ,A''i'lhl'' "l'Ioint',. w wv Hts'
meeting. ~ report hNeE.sl. niel, itit NY
W. pfii'lhh9 vi t'GnN anu J'i"l'ss' rnttoil,
WIS., "lhnr ,hlenah''lsr, anoi'H ~ Helh nv.
'i,'a nov to'h,'i Gown VIII POI 'eit1 WNlailf
~ ntapa ''i'H f'tgst thei" s''h ~ ~ reason
hlI'ceh WHY eo'lnn pftre' ann'll'i 10 pit'n '"'
ms '.fGN proportion "l rH'u"'. mo proper
non ~ thre pali fof M cotton Ihies. according
TO- III" 'a,..led crop IN ON Sn,''nr'l 'ta"
~ 1',s Yeaf; h'haf''a1S Y" e'.@.S ho pouihis.
u a price ~ average Ih'fa, lN' onhtt per
pound. amounts 70 si.I@Ss1. lhts ih'gn
sum gn@ " southern planters inl goods lhtf
wore never 'Hlhlahetl no lisilrtR mus
'''nWn danlollH'lnfn fhN 'tnppi'ailu" OF tho
matter " foIna nlhflnlh'L,lt'ts lnlothl ~
the nani1nr n' lna'lhg f'h"n'h s'ao f'eelNe NJ
lft"h, iol III pfNtNnt silaia ~ ~ average q
per cont additional :" SAND ANA other lns'lae
~ tho bNlh. ihNra W. therefore. u total 81 y
pnr cent N worthless nateflat forced upon
thh manufacturers All mn annual GSpnnh" to
them at about sGlSl.n n1 III" report further
sNts torththai II Waa no credit To American IN
h'tllgw''1hu1 ability mat our manufacturers
rnh'i'ln' e Ihv inI cotton ~ gross. Wtlon 'nl-
Mgh huN",a s"' th'', cotton nj net W"iGht