New-York tribune., 1879-03-26

| O-IIoW long would it take 10 get u n,
Al could be done hour, but it would not DC
| strong enough for durability. =. ,,.s. IN an
hoIrf Al am not sufficient judge TO tell-uhess
am told-whether made IN an hour vi ohe nA''
oWhat il tho shortest time in which you think that
could be set and made IRON 5he ThSt rS mshs take
about five hours probably not that long, tnuA p'o'
"p9 o-Wbot was the ordinary tmei A.-Abont ten
hours For instance sent # away about o'clock ana
got the forms backabogt o'clock the next mOii'"s'
QEDid you see Mr.. Talmage as he passed into the
rocrh on the first occasion A;-Yes SIR. ,,d
Odd he have anythingf Al uld not notieei u"
Q-Wno gave YOU the electrotypei A-The foreman; man,
| G-What were yOur Impressions IN regdfu 10 VIVA.
was done that evenngl AThat they were NOT correo'
according to the wishes ana desires @ Ui We bis i'm,
pressions regard what was done claiming ihat IL
be proper i'm Mr. McCullagh wanted to know
IL the witness could not bear tesllony 40
unless he was an expert when they were matters Vi
The moderator ruled ont the question regarding the
Impressions upon the witnesss mlnd; .,, ..
o-Dd you do anything further about thls mattel
did you communicate what you had seen 10 the proprie
TORS of the paper A.-NO, sir. =,
Q,-why noI A.-Because it was not my place 10 10
o-Did you think OF doing so
Objected TO and question withdra"n
OBJECTIONS TO PSYCHOLOGY.
Q-was that the only reason why you DID not no'iiy
the proprietors OF what you had scent
Dr smear again objected to what he called
.ol this psychology" Mr.. Crosby asked the
moderator whether the impression produced upon a
mans mind by the facts coming under his notice could
not be introduced evidence The moderator declined @
to the general question, Out hInPS Su o' u"
question put to the witness ,,-o,,., g., o.or, .,
Q-Did you receive any other directions In regard 10
this paper that nightl A.-No. sir.
oEDid YOU receive any further directions from
tho foreman at that time Al received % ha, no
nave stated | was instructed TO put the editorial IN
the paper and the advertisement and tIen was 10 80
Q.-Did you the next mornngi Ayes, sir. =.
0-What were they Any instruction was 10
rce copy upon the desk Of the secretary and manag
Nv Wp McCullagh-After DIR. Talmago's departure
from the room where you saw him enter, aiter he ha
retired from the building altogether where dh inc lOIe
man Mr. Cobeb, invite you to got Ale told me ne
wanted me remain after the forms had gone TO press
and to go to supper with him; ,.... A., - -
ceVp from Mr CObbell the whole instructions yOu re-
ceycd there, and give account Of your interview WIN
COBB what he tOI you ana what you sad to linn after
Won from support Al cannot recoeet all that
Give the substance as much as you can remcm-
Dr. Spear again objected unless Dr. Talmagc was frst
cnnuecied by the testimony with Mr.. COBB, ana Mr.
Miard added objection that was proving cOnVeF-
| saions not in the presence OF the defendant
Mr. McCullagh stated that he wished To snow that pr
Talmage had private communications with Mr C0DD,
the foreman which hes supposed to have put into h $
after Dr. Talmage's Withdrawal showing thattnls9
editorial and adyeflseent HoSG n
the witness regard to The character OF the editorial
"
! Christidn at Work being tampered with
Considerable discussion ensucd on thl5 point ana lhe
! moderator finally decided in favor OF the defence
Mr Crosby asked the witness could not tell what he
said 10 Mr. COob, TO which Mr. Milard raised precisely
! the same objection and the objection was Sustained
Mr.. REMINGIoN's TESTIMONY.
Mr. L. Remington was the next witness called by the
| prosecution, and was examined by Mr. Crosby as fol
| lows
o-Were YOU ever connected with The Christian al
! Horki Al
Q-Pease state as far you can your connection
with it; when it began and what 1t Any first
connection in the carly history Of the paper while
under the management OF Mr. Adams. l subscribed
~ 900 to assist him. and subsequently added TO 1t, max
ing $4,000 interest IN the paper
Q-Was Mr. Talmage editor any Of the time while you
were connected with the paper Ale was subse-
Q.-Frcm what year TO what year A.-His editorial
connection with the paper began IN 1873
Q.-When did IL cease Ain October, 1876.
same nature during Mr.. Taimages edtorship-i mean
did your relation to the paper change as proprietor
9aoSnmtBid anything ever occur between you and DR..
| Talmage OF AN unpleasant naturef Adjoining To my
o.wT6err was no collision between youl A.-NOne
Q-lou proprietor that Is chief proprietor OF
o|dIanding letter to witness)-Is that letter from
Q.-WiI you look at the signature and identify it
AoIWhat is the datei A-May II. 1875.
Tue was here offered and dd in eyldSnSe
Mr. Mr. Remington, H." as Chief owner Of the paper,
and Mr. Talmage ITS editor The letter, which was
would be- greatly rejolced II Mr. Remington could
| take the financial control Of the paper, and con
tanned in the body OF IL these woros in roieronce
TO the policy OF tine paper II should be the exact
| ponent of your own principles, which happen 10 be
| also my own. We now adjunct OF Tho Christian
! Uni1n the paptr of Oliver Johnson the spritualls
free-Oyer Frothinghanite and nhleL' ,,.,
Q.-(iandmg another letter to the witness)-ldeDtify
that letter. please. What Is the datel A.-August B.
| 1873.
| Q-Is it addressed to yOu by Dr. Talmage 7 At is
| The letter OF August 8, 1879 was also admitted in
evidence and read by Mr.. Crosby. The letter is Onl
covIng Mr. RemingOn'S discussion of the affairs OF the
paper goes TO the writer's opinion OF the bes
| publisher 10 be selected for the paper.
Q-Can you state any thing further which will illus
trate your relations with Mr.. Talmagci A-These are
according 10 my present recoilectl0ns tho only sug
| gestIons.
FIGHT OVER a LETTER.
Odd you address note 10 DR.. Talmage on the 1871
Of October, 1s76l Al believe did not posi-
tive as to the date. l wrote TO him about that time
MI Crosby here called upon the other side TO produc,
this letter referred 10 OF October ID. Mr. Mlard was
ready with the objection that 1t must first be shown thai
the letter written at that time.
Q.-YOu don't know whether you addressed letter tC
DR.. Talmage on October l3. 1876
Mr. Millard again objected the question as leading
| while the witness answered that he did not remember
distinctly.
| Q.-After he Withdrew Al did.
Q.-HOw did you send that letter Al sent 10 by
messenger from the Office OF The Christian at Work with
SPECIAL Instructions TO deliver 1t to DIR. 1almago If al
hOme not to somo that might II at hIi
| house.
Q.-Can you state the contents OF that letter
Mr.. Miilard again uterpOsed an objection, that
they had better evidence and must bring forward The
| messenger The moderator decided.
Q-Ilaye you any reason to believe that he received
| ltf Al have The messenger vas questioned afeI
his return at the Office.
Tue moderator finally decided that the letter must be
proved to have been IN Mr. Ialmages possession which
could be proved by tracing 1T through the boy or BY
proving certain actions OF Mr. Tamage which grew out
the receipt O that letter which proved the receipt
| oft.