National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-09

SUPREME COURT or THE DIsTRIcr-CHIEF-JUsTIoE
CARTIER ASD JUSTICE JAMEs-McCarty vs. Me
her TO try her case, and hearing set for tomorrow
Strait VS.. Strait alimony reduced to $40, and
power TO enforce payment by attachment; Welch
VS.. Murphy; decree settling the partnership rights
of the parties National Bank of Harrisburg VS..
Collins; motion 10 revive the suit in the name OF
Charles w. Collins. administrator of Reuben COL
Inns. Berry vs. Berry: motion ovcrruled. Magruder
vs. Thornton. argument commenced.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 1-JusTIcE WYIIE.-Dempsey
VS. Zantzinger; judgment of condemnation. Strong
VS. District OF Columbia trial progressing.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 2-JUsTICE CoX.--Tuckcr Il
Sherman VS.. Boston; on trial.
EQUITY CoUgT--JUsTICE MACARTHUR.-CoX VS..
Miller thirty days allowed to take testimony.
MARI Barry; pro confesso and guardian ad litem
appointed. Murray VS.. .Ager demurrer and plea
yer to take proof Colman VS.. Moore; extension
of loan to A. Grass ordered. Golfer VS.. McAnally;
auditors report confirmed. Warren vs. Warren;
CRIMINAL CouRT-JusTICE HAGNER.-Edward
NARROW, alias Babe Hawkins; perjury the de.
iendant on the 25th of November last was tried and
convicted of resisting officer OH that occasion
the accused went on the s-stand and testified
In his own behalf and is charged with giving false
evidence with view OF SECURING ms qisgnii,al;
assault with intent to kill Douglass Gibson; ON trial.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TOMORROW.
SUPREME COURT OF THE DIsrRICr-CnIRP-JusTICT
CARTIER AND JusrlcE JAMES mo. 134, Kelly use
Lieberman vs. Wright 14O, Fifth Baptist Church VS.
Baltimore e. Potomac Railroad Company l3g, Ma.
tional Metropolitan Bank VS.. Hit; ii6 United
States VS.. Stokes; l47, United States VS. Perkins, 140
Mccullough VS.. Dcnnison; ISL, IN TO estate John
Wagner l51, Cochran VS.. Clarke; 1853, Herner VS..
Dockendort; 1866, Alexander VS.. District Of Column
ba.
Wood & Co. vs. Grahami.e * Trinidad Asphalt Paw.
ing Company; III, Adams VS.. District of Columbia
175. Shehan VS.. Reilly; 2Oo, spaids vs. Cooley 297
Wolf Curtis VS.. Augenstein 30l, Lynch ct ux. VS.,
District of Columbia 347 Makely VS.. Cottrell Bros
S5l, Matthews administrative, VIZ. Baldwin CT al;
359, London & Manchester Plate-Glass Company
limited, VS.. Holmes; 375 Chapline VS.: Taylor; S9l
Wood vs. Darlington ct al; 1923 Poiknhorn VS.. Dyer
ct al; 427 Parker VS.. McChesney 435, Wall VS.. Rob
inson; 439, Kennebec Ice Company vs.. Inland d
person ark
AS, Seal VS.. Naior; AL United States VS.. Nation
ct al; 49, Lanahan VS.. Young e al; 4sl, smith :
wmSa dng & a. sSs1 se VS. 49, p rs
Hill; 400, Stanton vs. Wroe.
CIRCUIT GSv .,.o, No 2,TSTch SoH chii:
Marks ct al. Regular Calendar-No. $40, Childs VS.
Marks ct al; 22s, Washington Market Company VS.
Hoffman; 62, Teuber ct ux. vs.. Huber ct ux.; l76
Archer VS.. Pratt lSS. Reside, agent, VS.. Lucas
20S French VS.. McPherson ct al; 2li, Davis Son.
VS.. smooe 2ls Liebbechutz vs. McNall 90, Pat
terson VS.. Mosler; DID, District of Columbia VS.
District Of Columbia; $50. Wheeler VS.. johnson
232 Northern Liberty Market Company vs. Rillian
2i2 Truesdell, executor. vs. Terry ct al; 2i6 Bird
get VS.. Cornish 2iS, Hyatt VS.. Tutte; 4G5 Wagner
Il Co. vs. Benedict ct al.
EQUITY CoURT-JusTIcE MACARTHuR.-No. 2
Casteman VS.. Frederick; 20, Barbour vs., Naylor
Burch VS. Wallach and Wallach vs. Burch % Balt
more Equitable Society vs. Grant; %, Shields VS.
District Of Columbia; "a, Burns vs.. District Of
Columbia; 90 Brereton vs.. Brereton; 20, Norris vs.
Hall; ~, Young VS.. Duvall.
CRIMINAL CoURT-JUsTIcE HAGNER. Jennie
Pollard receiving stolen property George Holmes
burglary Zaehariah Baylor and Mile Baylor, ar