National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-20

Pratt administrator bonded In a 900. In re estate
maria bancroft; inventory OF personal estate re-
turned by executIix In re Emily N; Meloy; eta
Ton against guardian returned served. In re Ellis
Spear; additional guardians bond ofs2,0OO executed
In re Albina lIellmuth order of court appointing
petitioner guardian to the orphans OF Philip Roth
authorized TO sell assets and sue parties withhold
ing assets. In re estate +. g. Whitney; referred to
register to state Nh account and continued to
January 2. In re estate Peter ODonnoghuc; proof
of publication. In re estate Sallie w. Grimes;
guardian directed to pay out of Wards personal
estate the necessary sums for board and clothing,
In re estate j. A. L. Morrell; Lucille Morrel APP
pointed cxecutrix. In re estate r. a. Paul; H. f..
johnson and Edward Dunn appointed adminiStra-
tors with will annexed
The following accounts have been approved and
passed In re estate John H. Langley first aud
final Administrative account. In re estate l.. f..
Campbell; first administrative account. In re John
Hitz first gnardians account In re j. NJ. Carislo;
second account OF executor and executrix. In re
John f. Garner; fourth guardians account. In re
j. T. Ball. first account of guardian.
:, The court adjourned until the second day oil
January.
Beavers, alias Keithley, larceny; guilty Jennie
Pollard receiving stolen property under The value
OF SIS; guilty; fined 81. and restitution ordered.
ASSIGNMENTS FoR MONDAY.
SUPREME CouRT OF THE DIsrRIcT-CruEFJusTEcE
estate John Wagner; 147, United States Va Per-
kins 1858, Washington Brick Machine Company
vs. SI 100 Berwood estate; TO- United y i s,n,es
states We, Jones' 49, Prather vs. Hill; ~; National
Metropolitan Bank VS.. District of Columbia; ",
Tucker ct al. VS.. District of Columbia.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 1-JUsTICE WYLIE-No. 105,
Wood & 20, vs. Grahanli.e IL Trinidad Asphalt Paw.
ing Company III, Adams VS.. District Of Columbia;
1l5 Shchan VS.. Reilly; 300 Spaids vs. Cooley; 29T,
Wolf Il Curtis w. Augcnstcin; SOL Lynch ct ux. VS..
District of Columbia; Si7 Makcly vs.. Cottrell Bros;
35l Matthews, Administrative, W. Baldwin ct al;
800, London & Manchester Plate-Gass Company
limited, VS.. Holmes; 375, Chopine VS.. Taylor 39l
Wood vs.. Darlington ct al d23, Poikinhorn vs.. Dyer
ct al 427 Parker vs. McChesney; 435, Wall VS.. Rob
inson: 43g Kennebec Ice Company VS.. Inland y
Seaboard Consting Company AL, lIerfurth VS.. Cor
poration ofWashington ii3, Washington vs. Clark
445, Seal vs. Nailor i47. United States vs.. Nation
ct al; ii9. Lannhan vs. Young ct al; 45l. Smith 4
WimSatt vs. Long ct al, garnishees; 455, Petit
Drip VS.. Brown; l57, Seldner & Son vs. Bicbcr ct
al.; 1863 Holmes VS.. Kirk; i67. Basshor d Co. VS..
| Ilill Ago, Stanton VS.. WrOc.
CIRCUIT COURT No. 2--JusTIcE Cox. = No. 81
Strong vs. District Of Columbia; 2G2 Van Rswlck
| VS.. Hamlink; 27G, Smith, by next friend vs. Doug
lass; 2S6, Sullivan Henry; 2SS Morrow VS.. Dun
canson; 800. Ashton n Co. VS., Curtin; 202, Morsel
executor VS.. Thompson; 20i, Smith, Brge " Co VS.
Bryan; 800. Graffvs Howland 30i, Lynch ct uX. VS.
District Of Columbia $685. Creswcll ct oil. VS.. Brufl
ct al; $40, Appleman ct al. VS.. Terry ct nl.; 3l2
Kraft VS.. Langdon 3l4, Murphy VS.. Douglass; 3l6
RcSsuer VS.. Shepherd.