Ellsworth American. [volume] (Ellsworth, Me.) 1855-current, 1879-04-24
sep. ysa. Cesrs---Aprti Tern. 1879.
J. W. SYMoSps, Judge, Presiding.
II. B. SAUNDERS. Clerk.
a l.. bEyEREUN. Sheriff
WOODBURY. PULsIFER, Stenographer.

Hosea b. Phillips v. Geo. II. knowlton.
This was an action to recover the amount Of
an account for articles sold by knowton from
Phillips farm IN Dedham while he was 10 oc-
cupation. The defence was that the matter
hal been arranged snd settled at the time.
Verdict for the Defendant
Hsdlock for PHI. Peters for Defendant
Mary Richardson Y. John Richardson.
This was an action to recover one quarter
part Of the siumpase OF granite received by the
defendant, from qusrry Of which Pin. claimed
to own one quarter. The defence was that
defendant owned the whole quarry after the
case VS.. opened. II being apparent that sew
eral que s,lous Of law were involved the case
Wa. by consent reported to the full Court for
decision
wi.wcll for PIT Hale { Emery for Den.
Frank \. Wood '. Mary A. salisbury.
The Pin. was in trade at Bar Harbor In 1874.
and $50, and sold good, which he claimed
were sold upon the credit OF the Defendant,
which she authorized. The Defendant claimed
that she never authorized the charges to her,
but that her husband was the proper party to
pay for them il he hal them. Thi. action was
10 recover tue pay OF lhc utitbuAHt- 'tiu'1t
for PHI for exc.
Hale 4 Emery Tor ria. wi,wel for Den.
James T. Farrell y. Reuben 6. DurSan.
This was an action 10 recover the amount OF
4 negotiable note given by Den. 10 one LAWYER.
Defendant, claimed that he wa. cheated by
LAWYER in the cloth for which the not. was
given. and that the note was obtained by fraud.
~. 1.
fore maturity. IN the ordinary course Of busi-
ne.. for consideration, and without knowl-
edge Of any trouble IN is origin. Verdict for
the Plaintiff for the amount OF the note
Hale d Emery for PA. iIadioek for Den.
Lcmuel CrAbtree v. william H. Cl.phsm.
ThI. was an action upon long account for
cA,h and mcrch auIi.e, from Oct. lS56 10 Feb
rusry IS7i. II was claimed in defence that
,hi- account va. properly = part Of partner
ship Transactions, the parties having been in
partnership In the grAaite business during tha,
time. Amer the testimony was out. IL Vas
agreed by the parties tha; the account should
b. regarded a. a partnership transaction, and
included ia the settlement Of the partnership
accounts. aud special verdict 10 thst eject
Wa. rendered for the Defendant by consent.
Hale 4 Emery for Plf wi.well tor pcfl.
Tryrhosa Bunker =. Isaac Cot.
The parties live At West Ellsworth. Gou
live with PIT husband and Plf claims tina,
in February ls1s, Goti assaulted her. and threw
her down. dislocsiiug her ankle and bruisiug
her leg. from which she had suffered great
pain. and become lame. Den. claim. he was
putti4g her out Of hi. room and only used such
force a. wa. necessary. Verdict for the Pin.
Tor ESQ.
Hs.e 4 Emery for PHI .iailock for Def.
Charlie Bonzey, Jr., Robert Gerry.
Thi- was an action to recover the amour, Of
an account for saving lumber boxes. and for
other labor in aud about Gerrys mil in l-.j
and 1873. Aftsr the case was opened TO The Ju-
~ by the plaintiffs counsel, 81 the suggestion
Of the Judge. Gerry consented 10 4 default, and
Henry NJ. Hall wa. appointed by the Court to
assess the damages.
Hale & Emery for PHI Peters for Den.
william Morrison Geo. II. Mace.
This was the next case in order and wa. an
action 10 recover damages for an assault and
battery; but Il was continued upon defendant.
affidavit and proof Of the absence OF amaterial
witness.
Hale 4 Emery for Pin Peters tor Den.
There being no other cases ready for the iu-
~. the juries were excused until Wednesday
morning, and the Afternoon was occupied in
hearing motions. and cases referred TO the
Court.
Maria Smith Cornelius Wasgatt, Admir-.
This WAS all appeal by the widow Of John
Smith from pro forma decree, allowing the
Administrators account, and seeking To charge
The Administrator with the amount Of sundry
notes snd coin, and goods and chAttels. The
Administrator admitted that he held the notes
and coin, but alleged that they were claimed
by other parties As gift from the deceased
lie denied having any OF the goods and chat
| tell.
The Judge decided that the alleged gin Was
not valid, and ordered that the Administrator
stand charged with the notes and coin, but not
with the good. and ehsitels, and ordered that
the Administrators costs be paid out Of the
estate.
| Trip for Maria smith. Hale 4 Emery for
the Administrator.
spoford for the Claimants.