National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-02


SUPREME CounT OF THE DIsrnIcr-CHIEF-J usTIcR
CARTTER AND JUsTICR JAMEs-Morgan vs. District
OF columbia; judgment below reversed and cause
remanded for new trial McGowan vs. Todd; ar
CIRCUIT COURT No. 1-JUsTIcE wYLfE.-IIayden
VS.. Chesapeake 4 Ohio Canal Company; verdict for
plaintiff for 5000: shuster 4 Son vs.. Shuser;
judgment confessed. Shepherd q Co. VS.. Mclntirej
dismissed by plaintiff. Hewitt Lewis VS. District
Of Columbia Judgment for plaintiff, one cent dam.
non-suit. First National bank OF Leavenworth,
Kansas VS.. Rocssle verdict for plaintiff for s70562
WIN interest and protest Beatty VS.. Whitaker;
verdict for plaintiff; $40 damages. Totten vs.. vii.
som Judgment for plaintiff Tobln VS.. Knights Of
81 Patrick; jury sworn and rcspited.
CIRCUIT Court No. 2--JUsriCR Cox.--IIubcr ct
ux VS.. Teuber ct ux trlat still progressing.
EQUITY counT-JusTfcE MACARTHuR..-The De.
celnbcr term of this court conyen& at II o'clock
lnis morning The calendar numbers hflysix
cases and shows marked decrease IN the Chan
cellors business, also speaking well for the courts
expedition In dlsposng OF the causes coming before
:, CRIMINAL couRT-JusrIcE HAGSER.-Herman
brandt; indecent assault upon Emma Fleith; on
ASSIGNMENTS ron TO-DAY.
SUPREME Court OF THE DIsTRIcr-CmEF JUSTICE
CARTIER AND JUSTICE JAMEs--No, 1877, MCGOWAN VS..
Todd 1872, United States use Wilson, Ames 1885,
w, Welch vs. Murphy; 1854, Magrudcr vs., Thornton;
irct Of Columbia VS. Bradford; 1877, Strong vs. tnta;
lbs, Fleming VS.. lIyer l3g, National Metropolitan
gan6 vs. li lio Fifth baptist church vs. Pqti-
ton Gas Light Company W.. District of Columbia
CIRCUIT CoUnT No. 1-JusTIcE wYLR.-No. 49,
Middleton 4 Co. Us. worchi 40, Polkinhorn, vs.
Dyer ct AL; 427, Parker vs. McChesney 49, Wall vs.
Robinson l37 Bartlett ct al, District of Column
bia 49,. Kennebec Ice Company VS.. Inland e
Seaboard Coasting Company; al. Herfurth vs.
corporation OF Washington; !43, Washington vs.
Clark 4l5 Seal VS.. Major; All, United States vs.
Matt9on ct al; 40 Lanahan VS.. Young ct al; 45l
smith Il Wimsntt vs. Long ct al. garnishecs; ij3
District of Columbia VS.. Johnsons; 400 Pe,tet &
Drip vs; Brown; 49, Seldner Il Son VS., Bieber ct
a.; $50, Bgelow vs. Armcs l6I United States, of
windsor, VS.. Johnson ct nj; l63, Holmes VS., Kirk
| 4C' Basshor Il Co. vs. HILL 400, Stanton VS., wroc.
CIRCUIT Court No. 2--JusrIcE Cox.-No. a.
Strong vs.; District of Columbia; 800 Chlids vs.
manys. District Of Columbia; ito, Bennett
vs. Wilson. Regular Calcndnr-No l6, Armstrong
vs. Williams; $50, Daley vs. Trunncll: $40, Childs Vs.
Marks ct al; DIS Washington Market Company vs.
| Hoffman; 5S Huber ct uX. VS.. Teuber ct ux g.
TeuDer ct ux. Us; Huber ct ux.; 81 Tucker aud
Pimkard; 1872, Lemont VS.. ". 4 G. r. Il.
| Co..; l7G, Archer VS.. Pratt 1888, Reside, agent
vs. Lucas; 100 Thwing ct al. VS.. Dean ct nl.; 2OS
smoot:2ls Liebbechutz vs.. McNali;22O Patterson vs.
Mosier; 222 District of Columbia VS.. Forsyth; 226
l'ogue VS.. Cropey; 10, ONeal District OF Column
bio; 23O, Wheeler vs. Johnson; 232. Northern Liberty
cntor VS.. Terry ct al; 2i6, Bridget vs. Cornish 2iS
Hyatt VS.. futile: 46j. Wagner Il Co. vs. Benedict
| ct al
EouITY CoURr-JusTIcE MAcAarHun-No 1,
Cox VS.. MCPHERSON; 2. Custleman VS.. Frederick 3,
| Lewis, trustee, VS. Kennedy a. BakcRmith VS..
Meister ., Van Riswick VS.. Spalding g. jackson VS..
diulse; DAILY W. Fitzmorris; $, Riddle VS.; Wright
U, campbell Us. Kennedy; 10, Nourse vs. Thornton.
CRIMINAL COURT JUSTICE HAGNER. George
| Brown false claims George Holmes, alias George
Brown burglary aud larceny; james Baylor, Zach
Elsinger, assault with Intent to KILL Herman
Brandt, assault and battery.