The Iowa plain dealer. [volume] (New Oregon, Howard County, Iowa) 1867-1895, 1879-08-01

sssNe4 + 49, "a s~ssseA - sAa4s ~
hMbA = asee#FYs sA#sAA a.Ma# sas& sasA4
- ssHs Al - 49, sss*HsssAs
ss8s@Msas ia susN wNas "a ~.
$3.50 IA s4*AmsA A#
fsN@Asss 49, se#H AsAssA#aaeA
- 49, Nsstr ssssss
#Ys4#smA swNsAss fmsetee ne. "a
ssAAFa4AeA
49, II - #msaasNsA
a#a ~ esssa - ~ pssss#4sA
ssw tNsssamss 4 sAt s4As ~ssN a ~
ea.ta aAsfAss#ssNF#
w. st4vsi,~ fssa4s ws~# H. w. 10
~ aWs "A ~ Ia
iss ~ 'as - y ~ ,Hsgia - ts~t 80
~ sN#
@s~ss# ,lErias +~~#asssA " 49,
faM4s.s
laa y hase usss~sa .~,ss m@s u
NnsastAHsHM
iMW4 sutsWss sss4A shs rAssHn
t#s t~sns snssass nAsr ~ t~4e,sir
Iit Asssas rtss ,@sarht 18th ssssn
imshs
49, sts i,esnsis - t~aa ~ rr~As~sA.
Nmssiasai hauts hase Impoverished In
.is.sss.
Ira ". ~a,~ ssfi she nsssensl t~aks
ri'e vslHfal w hanas slavery la.rar
itatsh ~Hs
The emsssssl IL hamsn maa4ie aud
lsain rshqasssi a lsnre
Thr eAlusHl III nsasrie ANIL l,tnin u IN.
tsett+f ii t8rhrs
lsst Tie survival II she tslle~s prevail
Iss aiinalieth he~ IL the esant.srsit
"a thF titnasiani~ehis Years Aan. 1Ieh
tlse slave ,n~.t fsiri lsss N ~.h,
slasn. ssS ile tsasae, twwef rules II
hal 80 ,la~a alsa.
Mhrn Vi, slave crwrr demanded That
s'aNriy tlnnsi IN lts,terts,i. nhd 'hss
ftfr ltsns li,Wn vil,srHs shuuld assist
| nstsei Aiei.a Afasslla's in cmpiaa n
might've SLAVES Anh returning them ~
their seasi.s-. The l@nplc ttamrlrd HI.
prrd Ssett decision un.les f,.s aud a,r
l.al,d ~ = higher law, aud advocated
ihe immediate al,oll,l"n II slavery. A
more conservative element sail. No;
la ~ rlrcnmscf,he II. limits; tsnntnc u
~ the States where ID tinN exists. tru
hihlt IL extension into tho Territories,
ald place II nn,lrr process ri ultimate
extinction" The radicals weEe called
Abolition fMnnties.s aud wcsr csaxy On
slavery Petition after petition had
been trili ~ Congress, until finally the
two old parties concluded IN "sit down
upon them, mud dvl 80 hy rcfusinR a.
receive my more petitions Ia alnlisl,
slavery, Then thr Republican r@rly
waS organized. They were the con.
nersa'ives and said; NO more slavc
territory"
There were also conservatives among
the Democrats. They were ia favor 81
s1,,as.er sovereignty aud advocated the
right ~ carry slavery into the Territories
aud vote slavery mp ur 70 there with.
cut slaves aud .yotc slavery down In
1860 the Democratic party divided ON
this question mud the people voted
slavery down." Ii resulted III war and
~yon know how II " yourself"
During tho war the money power
voted slavery up again. and transferred
ii from tile colored people ri tho South
to the whole people 81 tho North. South,
East. and West. Tho Government
bond IN the basis ri this slavery. Tho
power oil interest II tho poverty oi labor.
The bond that hears interest 10 be paid
by tho Government In the basis of the
national bank. The national hank II
tho basis ~ all money lending. Money
lending II tho cause u mortgages. This
IN financial slnattcr sovereignty. The
law says this In right, bnt wo appeal u
higher law This may hc ruvoln.
tionnry. Ifto, W arc all leaders III u
revolution that II not going hAck wAf.i,
hut forward and On 10 victory. The
advocate III tho bond system occupies the
same poH tinn now that tho pro slavery
advocate did twenty years ago. The
anti .bond element oi to-day In running
parallel 10 the course pursued by thu
anti-slavcry element of twenty years
sgo. The two old parties III to-day ar,
running parallel 10 the course pursued
by tho two old parties of twenty year,
ago. The conservatives who nay "StOI
irsniDg bonds, aud l,Ay on the present
bonded debt - MOON ~ poasible.' Ars
running parallel 10 the course pursued
by the Republican party twenty year,
xNo. This IN accepted only M i com
promise issue, not because II Ii right
A more radical element. running parallel
10 the old Abolition party II twent,
years ngo, demand the Immediate alnli
ton of thc bonded debt by liz payment
In absolute money. Az slavery went, -
will the bonds go. Under the Demo
cratic. Republican idea u financial squat
tar sovereignty they cannot continue 4,
the hasis III a system Ut slavery from
which mortgages shall come 10 sqnnl
upon the farms aud homes ri ouI
impoverished industries, there 10 liy,
and fatteii. This IL not Il question Il
be- regulated by tho Htates. some d
which will invite this financial squattcl
sovereignty 10 como ON i high rate b
interest and squat under rigorous lawl
for the collection of debit. No; IL Il
not question Tor States 10 scttle. II
must 10 settled by tho whole people
who must have . uniform system
81 government, uniform ayatcnl d
money and uniform syatem ri "
change. 10 10 on = humanitarian l1oAis
there should b. no law Tor tho o0llec
ton of ,lcbt~ BY distnint. This would
force the direct exchange VI property
upon tho hasis oi equivalent values, vi
make only dsbts III honor. Mono,
would then oil 60 into Legitimate husi
nssa. W. mnnt have plcuty d mono,
and no uoversmrnt bondA bearing M,
rata ii interest whatever. These thing,
VIZ cannot have while We have Demo
cratic party In power In both houses o
Congress advocating thu hard.money
relic III basbArism aud BtatN SiglltA
which imply State banks and Rnancia
sqnattcr sovereignty. Nor can We hav'
these blessings while W. have Presi
dent. \ Cabinet, and, especially, \ BOO
r,tavy u the Treasury advocating sys
tenn Of bond slavery and nMtional.banl
] slavery. ard under there KYsfcm o