, 1879-02-01

C11 l. O1AO21 II tAD1A O141t L
had bern brought befpsc slc beginning OF the
!ear dYrinE The yen he had omitted from bis
"Entreiv. That & the way NC understood
It; tEat y .tr proof"
"1lc Grand Ius3's conclusion Vas that re
ougt to have rctnrnc'' alt Tic gecs that be re-
crETr1f during th: yrarl''
"Wc ~ nnderstood It. By thc 1aw, and BY the
rules laid down by Tho Supreme t.ouFt of The
United States, That that was his 1ntt.'
Understand you to eay the Hr4nd Jury did
return une indlctIneatfh
Yes, sir. for receiving llltsa1 fees.-taksng
ices that we considered the Law did not allow
httf-oYerIhafges.h
Did the D!str,es~Attosuey give ron anY IN
strnetton Of the lsw'tn regard to finding any
indicttnent!"
II am not positive, hut think he lid. We
had tue law aud the contradictions laid down hE
a.si t'.s Supreme Court and "e talked IT o''r asooa
Mr. 1aoham-what was The Distrlet-Attor-
ney'a aiyi.ef
II couldn't .ay po.'.ive'v: I vouldn't COM
fnencc telling 1t for fear nuuId tell Il dl(Jtr-
ccnt. You Will gtt that from tue reporter
There was tuli. md cnuneel for Judge
b1odgctt said uesa would be no eross e1ausua.
| tion.
Judge Tsnm}nll-Te are entirrly sa,,saeei
with tue CoUmttteefs examination.
Ny. Cn1berson ITO wltne.st-You sav you do
| 1sIL A4iQH HUEllkEE tuE V12N1Ek ALtQsQSY gave
Easel
| remember
''What opinion did he gt,e yours ....
~ could not tell ron. tell yu,l could not
Wasn't be Informed that the Grand Jury
had agreed to hnd bill"
"lte was, tir.n
"And ll.in't he prepare The bi1's"
!lt sail he di,s. We never saw lt.''
undrr tlIc proDf a.
=! don't think he did. sir'
| "Didnt no 6a1 that yo,t ron1dr'
~ think he I'D. would mt ssy positive: I
suppose he wnll'd not i,sve prrpared tAe isllct-
tncnt 'tnless he thought re could"
The facts, II yon believed the facts, HItbard
! could be indicted for that otl.nsci"
| we SO Understood II. Iuld ~ least"
| "Anl wasn't he furnished with memorau.
/ dun OF thr facts aud charEcsf"
" itH wns, sir."'
& "Ana ,' '!Ilnt hs prepare the bill against him
-. - lle said he did, and ! have no doubt that ho
IBID he say |. to tic jury in body In the
"fle did,
| "p!d he offer 10 read t.l'
! mo, air. 1le sail he wAs instructed to with.
hold II " The Judge"
Aud refuse to give tho jury thr tus.ructtona
whfs, whfs be had received from The Judge in writ
!ngt" =.
= lie would rather not"
Jt.!gc Trunhull-DM you undertake 10 de-
eide for yourselves what ;llt' Inv was as to the
requirement to make return of a!l The fecs re.
Getvca oilfne thn yer. Or oa,Y Of those received
| According to thc rules the Supreme Court
had laid down 10 govern tlr Registers In Bank
| ru1,tcr, our understanding Of the law IVES That
t'. hs IliiSearl2 sh9nld return the whole amount
s'.' = H., III vo,, ,eS;a. tor ,..,, ,.,..
as t t9 what The law was}'
xas s.sa oH can , Ien'cmocf whether That question
eassF" ss' fG auG9hte5 9thtte%0u' or not a'nt re-
a..,s ask ~ y q q yoa Is Grand Juror. DID Tou
oee'1e ,,.1:!,. !la, ior yourseayes'"
,nvh,as aee'ofa H. u inyssli, w. Without advice from
| FeaH tHt IL" anu thG Fnlee my5clf, nnd can An.
! AHer Tor nlgscl1."
| was u question Of discussion In the Grand
,ut! F'io1n as TO tic proper construction Of tho
lay 10 tItat rcspectW
IT was discussed some, but We we're Of the
ices recording to tho rules laid down under illat
iau.m
had "eoe, sse 10Y informed sIat IT, District judge
from Tint entertained hy yourse,vrs!'
ahat = "nat JudEe hangs said was the
feas4;' s.s,1 he Hlthhcid the ina!stAnent,h
| :, "Werc 5ou informed Of that before Judge
bancs -, came back atd withheld the tndlct-
mentf"
"Nos str."
.,, "lhat was ihe NAT information ynu had Is TO
tne constr1'stion Which flal been put upon tue
law y! she District '!udge!"
ron'u not hare the Indictment ready until
oslock, when h wc could coae In and be d!scharE;
20 90 20 70 60 home IN the morning. Ws had
10 saea an9nt ny tn1s' only that be had been work.
ing Gt y az day."
"nad the Jury requested tho Judge 10 re-