The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1879-01-14
COURT CALENDARS-THIS DAY.

| NOORl la.
| SUPREME CouRr-CHAMBEps-- by Judge Bar
rett-Nos Ii, "a 49, 81 3d. 1ls 1l9, H. 1875 i29 49,
1856 1877 1873 iC3 III IT, 1880 49, 1884, 1866 213 2ls,
$50 24O 243 24G 24S 271 Oh 2s1 2s2 2s5a 2Ss 3O1.
| SupREME counT-orNERAL TEnar-Held by presid-
ing Judge Davis and Judges Brady ana Ingails-Nos.
| 1i6' III Isl 1sS 100 X. I7a lis. I4o.
! SupREME CoUnr-SpEcIAL TrRM-Held by Judge
49, Law ard s
sO7 1856 727 1856 TIA $780, 7S3 7S4 1885, 674 $685. GIT,
6ls. 593, sl4.
| SUPREME CounT-CIncuIT-Pa Held by Judge
Donohue-Nos 227O 2S7G 1885, 2725 COG, 2692, 276l,
2765 2719 25o7 SOY, 75 275o 25lO 1921. 2s44 1883,
2313 1868 1857 1866 1925 2l25, 12401s 1884, 1920,
| 2795 l775h. 2s:Is 222s lO2l 4523 1900 273l 1851
82O7 27C3 277s 26ss 21o1 3Oi5 a9Oo $685. 29ll Part
2-Adiourned until tomorrow All the cases on the
calendar of this part been transferred Part 3.
i7os ioa5 s s 4o as7a aSsa ai55, 1871 49,
81; 2oS2 1860 2ooa osS' 1885, ziS0' 22os' io 2i4o'
| supEaron oounr-GENERAL TERM-Held by Judges
'S r uoas. anu cr,s - Trn,, 10 ua,d IN, 1rdo
sedgwick.-Nos CO. 49, 49, 49, "A. 49, 49, 4s. 49, o. "a.
SUPERIOR CouRr-TRrAI TERM-Part Held by
vmusr ee naa 900 '1 Is ' : nov 20, 20 ~
Horned for for the he term '''' -''' '''' -''
"n,a D. ~. 'I cr.r, rs,,, u.,d nv, rbiae Inc
rico nniv and Jmnes Van Rrunt and II Iarremore
Gou ha opens e s a as zen o. ~ 'o S
coMMos PIEAs"SppcIaI. TERM-He,d bv Judge J.
g, co p' anu Eor rvr, Ad,orrrod sor tho
| ..r,,, ~ 40 WAY
'erii. ,r No., rr,,.
W. 1 81 "a, Ias las 200 uoT ~ 10 '" ,qs
rca soo s%a ,.rSS ,o.c 81, ao, 900 nso part o %
! adiomrne dc Tor the term o-'' '-'' ''' wv
| No. Tnrur rrr., Tp,,,-p.rt ue1d bx
ch;ae I,,ston SiLar Nns sa-l z-ae Sor1 Eroi 1aS
Sn 1a y. s'S a.a sa; 9s SS @
| aats, ~ Hi H., G,,o. S;,nnt, No. I1Ia'
91s" zoa zoo W ..on 10: r1o ,iuo
AVA sSos 1870 415T. i4sT' part aLHeld by Judge
GoeppSos S2S4 1882 ~. lsao ,s SG 10 5lao $685. Ss
S90 S3sa E"s9 soss soas $50 sooi Tooo
$685. 520i. $685. $780, SOS. $500
| GiIdersieeve The peonIe vs Fredar;ct Fesf hone;
eide. same va Patrct Conley rohherv. same ,a' VS.
Jobn Meiee se,oninns assault and hattayv Same VS.
| Aaron Harr;s crmaltv to animals part oWaii hv
Tmdoa G"uins T%e pso,ia va Jobn WcKenna any ny
| Tra5k WcKa5na homiciils fcontinmefN. same va
Gowan robb me ~Ane' no''' '''''e w. 'a"'S ''
1rNrrpn srArrC c,ypprMr co1rpr
| IMPORTANT LAND CASES DECIDED--NEw RULES
-
ADoPIhD'
WASHINGTON. Jan. IL. 1870.
Tho followiro worn amopg the proceedi,gs of tbe
ine ioiio~ine were AMONG 'no pfocee"inss Vi 'he
United States supreme Court To-day
the Uned states-Appeai from the District Court Of
the United States the western district of Mis-
,e appellants IN TINS &c cause lay CLAIM under
| of land in the states of Missouri and Arkansas
| comprising the whole or parts of twenty-four
| counties. Being unsuccessful below they
have brought the ease by appeal 10 this court which
holds that for the want OF an actual survey at the
time the grant was made and for want of an adequate
description by which il can now be SURVEYED or idep-
| tifed the claim does not come within the eleventh
section of the act of 1860 and the decree OF the Dis
trct Court rejecting il is affirmed Justice Miller de-
| iiverrd the opinion
| No 100. the United States vs. The Cities of New
| Orleans and BaltiInore-Appcal from the District
Court of the United States for the district of Lon
isiana-The cities Of New Orleans and Baltimore as
| Ie0ntees of one MrDonouph set mn In this
case claim, under Spanish grant to
800 acres of land In the state of Louisiana In the
lower court the claim was confirmed but the decree
of that court il here reversed upon the ground that
| mere permission to settle on land, unless fol-
| lowed by a former grant or something which
constituted legal Spanish title is not sufficient TO
sustain a claim under the provisions of the .private
| Land Claim act of 1860 The cause is remapded
with directions to dsrns IS the petition Justice Miller
| delivered the opinion.
| No Do Otto H. Andreae ct al. appellants vs. G. G.
| Redheld. executrix, xc.-Appeal from the Circuit
Court of the United States tor the Northern District
| of New York--Therc are pending in the Circuit
Court of the United States for the Northern District
sundry merchants in 1894 against Heman J. Icdacld.