Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1879-04-02

sentatives from st. Paul and Minneapolis, OF
course. largely predomiuated in numbers, If
not in ability. After the regular formal oper-
ing the calendar was taken up and causes as
signed as given below. This concluded, the
case of Nels P. Johnson, appellant. vs.. John D.
Howard, respondent, was taken up on motion
for reargument; J. J. Eagan for the motion and
Charles N. Bell against. Argument concluded,
the court took the matter under advisement,
aud an adjournment was had to $3.50 this
morning.
The Calendar.
l. Place Bass. appellantvs. Oliver Anderson
and H. T. B. Bagge, respondent. Passed.
q Roger S. Munger and Rish A. Gray,
vs.. John D. Howard, appellant.
Passed.
8. In the matter of the appeal of Elliot
Walker and A. J. Walker, heirs of Versal J.
Walker, deceased, from the report of commits
sioners of probate court of Hennepin county,
allowing claim of Susan P Walker, admins
tratrix of the estate of V. J. Walker, deceased.
Settled.
4. In the matter of the information of
Andrew Wilson, relator, vs. John w. Alexander,
respondent. April z.
5. In the matter of the information of John
A. Bomsta, of the County of Kandiyohi, relator,
vs.. John w. Arctander, respondent. April z.
6. Mary l.. Hall, executrix, and John J.
Cole, executor Of j. M. Hall, deceased, appel
lants, VS.. J. Page Mumford, respondent. Set
tied.
Z. The State of Minnesota, ex rel. Robert
M. Addison, relator, VS.. James w. Williams
and L. Webster, respondents. April e.:
8. In the matter of the appeal of Eliza A..
butcher from the judgment of the probate
court of Ramsey county, upon her accounting
as administrative of the estate of Gilbert
butcher, deceased. April Is.
n aN%
Mark Kobe, appellant. May Z.
10. The State of Minnesota, respondent, vs..
Mark Kobe, appellant: May z.
IL. The State of Minnesota, respondent, vs..
Chauncey Butler, appellant. Mays.
-; The State of Minnesota respondent vs.
49, Edward X. Sylte appellant, vs.. Svenno
Nelson, respondent. May 8.
a. In the matter of the application of st. Paul,
Saltwater & Taylors Falls Railroad company,
respondent: Va. Mary Greve. appellant Motion
to affirm under rule IA and motion to dismiss
appeal. April 2.
Is. Martin Finhurg, as administrator Of
the estate of Jacob Weiss, deceased, respond
ent, VS.. George Martin. Submitted.
16. Richard R. Cummings respondent, vs..
George B. Halsted, administrator of the estate
of Frank W. Halsted, deceased, appellant.
81 omitted.
IT, Thomas A. Miller by his guardian ad
| appellant. Submitted.
Is. Rufus M. Eastman, appellant, vs.. James
j. Linn, respondent. April g.
| 10. Louis E. Torinus, I. Edwin Staples and
VIM. &. Bronson, CO. partners as Torinus, Sta
Piles & Co., appellants, VS.. Reuben Thor atom.
respondent. April g.
20. Carleton College, respondent, VS.. John
| Curren, Hannah Curren, his wife, respondents,
and James McNaughton, appellant. April a.
| 81. Roger Jones, respondent, vs.. Julius A.
Town, appellant. Submitted.
%. Henrietta Somerville respondent, VS.
John Donaldson and James W. Somerviile, APP
pellants. April IL.
%. Frank He'll, appellant, vs.. Richard
Walsh, respondent. April 2.
"a. Christine Siebert, appellant, vs.. Jacob
Manner, respondent. April "a.
rs. William Taylor, appellant, VS.. Ambros.
81. Burgess, respondent. April %.
26. James L. Fisk and Libbie A. Fisk, his
wife, appellants, VS.. Jacob 81. Stewart, re
spondent. April IA.
| 81. John B. Brisbin, respondent, VS.. jane
Cleary, Martin J. Clury and Adolph Henschall
appellants. April 8.
%. Henry O'Gorman, as judge of probate
of Ramsey county, respondent, VS.. William
Lindeke, appellant. April21.
90. Thomas 81. Whitaker, appellant, VS.
Frank E. Healer, respondent. April 9.
30. William Spooner, appellant, VS.. Henri,
Spooner, respondent. April 10.
81. Wilhelmina Schmidt, appellant, VS.
Frederick Ludwig. respondent April rs.
80. The Etna Life Insurance company, re
spondent vs.. Catherine Donnelly and Ignatiu
Donnelly, appellants. April %.
SO. j. d. Cornell, appellant, Va. Eth,
Smith, respondent. Submitted.
"a. Frank Gertler, respondent, vs.. jackson
A. Linscott, appellant. May 81.
49, L. V. Goar, appellant, vs.. Nicolai Jacob
son, respondent. Passed.
So. James r. Dayton, respondent, VS.. Andre,
} Craik and A. w. Craik, as partners under tn
firm name of ''Craik Il Son." appellants. Nj
, ton to strike from the calendar and motion
and merits submitted in briefs.
81: Herman Bisbee: respondent, vs.. LOU
T.. Torinus, I. Edwin Staples and William {
Bronson, partners by the firm name of Torinu'
Staples & Co., appellants. April 80.
80. Louisa Reich, appellant, vs.. Charlie
. Reich and Ernestine Reich, respondent
April Is.
80. The State of Minnesota, appellant, "
R. B. Galusha, respondent. May 9.
40. The State of Minnesota, respondent, v
A. E. Messenger, appellant. April 10.
Al. John W. Arctander and D. s. Grifh1
partners as ''Arctander & Griffin" appellant
vs.. Thore Nelson. respondent. Passed.
AZ. A. s. Sjoberg, as administrator of Il
liant, VS.. Peter E. Nordin, responder
. April 30.
0 43. Nes. P. Holm, appellant, VS.. Peter !
: Ringstrom, respondent. Passed.
!, A. Charles May, David Symes and Alexa
u der Symes, vs.. The First Division of the s
Paul & Pacific Railroad Company and Hora,
Thompson, Edmund Rice and John 8. Kennel
, trustees of certain bondholders Of said railros
company, appellant April 20.
As. John Geary, an infant, by his ne
= friend. Cornelius Malone, respondent. VS.. Jot
q A. johnson, sheriff of Washington count
: Thomas Bowers, A. B. Easton and Silas s. De
u ton, appellants. April l6.
g As. Dorilus Morrison, respondent, VS.. Jo
B. Bassett, appellant. April %.
AZ. Lille Goebel, Matilda II. Holmes, Ere
II erck A. Mack and Ferdinand Willius, guard;
= ad Item of Horace P. Mack, Cora @. Mac
. Hugh Mack and Jesse Mack, VS.. Sherwot
Hough and Charles 81. Dixon, co-partners,
% slough & Dixon" respondents. April z.
" 4s. Joseph Dickinson, Jr., and Mary
Dickinson, respondents, vs.. George B. Haye
appellant. April %.
% 40. Bernhard Won. Claim, executor of t
> last will and estate Of August Won CLAIM, d
ceased, respondent, vs.. George L. Becker ct a
aDpella, t. May II.
" T. johnson, respondent. Stipulations fl
= and order of dismissal entered.
81. William Shane, appellant, vs.. The CT
10 of st. Paul. respondent. April II.
\. So. Daniel Mullen, respondent, VS.. Csc
). Stephenson and Lillian B. Stephenson,
- wife, and William Hurley, appellants. h
% spondent moves to affirm Judgment below q
ia der rule IA. April II.
So. Charles E. Gage. as executor of the Ia
s' will and testament of Reuben g. Page, 6
ts ceased, appellant. We. Rufus J. Baldwin, q
AZ fendant, E. B. Ames and II. G. Newcomb,
administrators with the will annexed of the
p tate of Levi Butler, deceased, garnishees, a
+ II. A. Stimson, claimant, respondents. Su
:. mitted.