New-York tribune., 1879-01-21
THE COUNTY CLERK7S CASE.

MORE ARGUMENTS OVER \ NANDAM'N' =
THE SECOND pRoCEEDISG BY MR. 81 SIT AGAINST
MR. G, MBLtTON-NE. BEACn's HiNIs OF P"-
MuCAL MOTIVES ~ IN ACH"N.
The second proceeding to compel CoulN
CloIA Gum'l,tou to cxiht bis books c.inc >'S''i'"'
befor. Jaosc Barrett IN supreme Court Chamoe'S o'
arsuu,nr IN. tjlc OF the ease l. ihc f'"pl' on 'o
iauon of AGnsuce j. Bush against Henry A. """"''
tom M Bush VIZ Que OF the commit tee OF The bar As
eoc.liop " ., instituted The former p'"ce''i'S """
Artrts IT, iio.mos nj counsel l. oneo ii 'Ame com
riifte4 rne new proceeding IS ayo Tcdy ~ aId OF 'ne
other and i- based upon a demand IN the County '''A
alter c tclag Judge Davis. and ON these ''elS 'o
present d,lcacr 60 NJ, Gumbcton IS largely founded
Mr I,ur. iu ri,-rltIgE i-e case sl'''"N N'') VIZ ny
ihc act. a. to row proceeding, "l' a'H''l w." '"''
f,,a cron former proceeding o"ly IN 'hal II WAS
sril., q ~ much ilnt gave IN n o,Acr ease posi-
l..;, - .ivif, Toy. are fact, 10 be snbmited 10
iuy." Tr, cas, 'ioscutcd oHly point of law ana ne
tr,rrit thr,c couJ Do. 300 ">o' preventing tue iSsu'
o. r ,cGjt OF rc-.uIto. m.nhl ndS.
j. H. Meade for 1. Grtl5'ctou. read thc la'icrs G'h-
i.vit r.i.n, q. some lnch the pro- eo!nss III the
.,r.rr .c ou his op. Willingness a Grs' 10 give access
=. .,e} ioc uurcI is control. hs later belief iat the
sol. ,,. ol tAe ,ou.t, ccs action WAS 10 get facts on
,h ;h. Governor '.t b- ..kDd to remove hin, ana
f, .uu, ro'.' c.o. wtr' us,ug The Bar A~S3''-
t' l.r .a"lo .U .i'"-c. ~ rtc''" Ne ie,o JUS
q, tt' t.r 's-.,.H r"u. it azure Z" Ie3,iiu ~
.,r.f .u ..l. 'r r"pi1rtru SITS oi - 'Sh ana ~ q"
ira fHC usefulness pl il4!
.,i.cf rud as 'Nur .n"'e. Other "iiaN's were 'o'"
.. .'.t,tIt ut Mr.. .irn'lrluu''. ,,..
MI Holmes V,iy briefly quoted The cases renee oh -
il M @ stated .u.t ia" u.l qJr'l"h on tht-c l"p,Ia
v.- whether "r. Bust hHi ie-h Ii-h' - gee tIc
h, J. f a. rr.f.r demand tad plt hiii-tii IH w
.,,,u 4, r...., H. Inc remainder of the papers, lie
-..i. consist uoItc9l houlIy. III wa no ah>"'I
q. Gel"4rU to, rl imu'' ~ r@hi 70 Nv va" u,,' w.
ire g,u. of Appeals. pcIrhaucc the Uhb ~"
nttlt. Court, t.It other have not tic i-Eht.
william 5. Beach renewed ~ Wuch ichEih MS sartu-
n.i o.. tAc previous proceeding tHt the Curt WpHld
.15ilt WlntaruS i'r a ldr""' q Ohcr ti'h 'h'l'
wI.Cn arp,att1 Oh as lace {A' 'o"tl Mouiu NO. S -
.;. .4 l.au- uaE pu- ana dccd-aioI! Pilo>"' H''
..... sru- g.. unworthy ana impr Per iGrHn-t'
T'ur otc. ,,as ~ turthera potl'a! dcYicr; II lhi'
...crut WAS tnc ccut OF pohii'& cabai, Iu'G D!
tlucltIiG whose .nrIu1uG wiihn crlidln cicltS vas
ou.upo;,u,, thci Ga, Court W ND not grant II me
lt,r- admitted lh.t th~ Application was not lot H'it
uutIc iIgAi. and hr Court sholu Dot he acc'tS"' !"
iur a..rIDIi.,. Iurroec. MI. Bt"ch thch aHutu a.
l..- g. .4, "a, 4.!.,.i ti { OF tEc p pIs.
J.d2. .jai;vtt .ccmed str"nth lucuncu HGi%'h, % q
mao aU> the utcNccpi tof one question h' ci
tr, rar.lu. granted DY Jud-c DAVIS, on whlch tHeit
Was e.a. -, lua adaIuuS the samc facts as now
lr,. u.uC. isc question whether the 1lSH l" al
.l,,.r,i,l , books not running rl&ht-Ohc
which lu.c4t 4r I.cwtu by d'maud from ddF 10 Gay
sO long as % Wa- not made for n'.r ANNOYANCE -,
..tlrd !8..t N 4 dEIn uH MI B"dch l4at tHt
lctlil r. according to his affidavit, did not believe
inc b.uN lc seeking was M existence anu
therefore, on "a statcmcDt-and ~ view of All lhH
b.ii.yr Biz rad advised M OUnnlrl"h 10 l"kt
alv;uft. g Il cVtTV t,c.nC dt'-ihc Wduddhu> "'u'l
be. u,p,, : Judge Barrett said he would consider that
pal.t .-u. bat should follow jude DAVIS III "Idt h'
had deciicd uuI decision Was reached by h'ghef
court. ,.-.,, =,
shown 10 any person NOT connected with The pOcttnS
M Holmes, turning 10 friend. asked hin 10 40 doW
with him and make Il deiuand Nj. Beach at once pro-
tested tga tls was not Wltmn tHc NPhlt o. hr oh'I
An adjournment was then taken. Judge Barrett re-
-