The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1879-03-05

NJ the Senator from Ohio that tho House hnd
the right to nut w'nt If rhoso ON the npproprin-
ton bills. uh that the Srnutp must tIl.s IT, Tho
S'uator presented the example Of England
which must b followed w this republic The
analogy was spi ndId. Tho Commons fought
hcrrldgry mpnHr'hs with whose choice they
hnd nptting to do. But this was not the ease IN
our country. Now. however. 1t was said
by Democrgtic Representatives. unless you
ncree to violate yonr primo pies your Govern
ment shall stop, and you shall have no army or
Mr. Whytc sad tho Republican party wanted
to retrrnt precisely ms they rctreatrd when
Winter DAVIS. member of the House put IN
mn army bill provsO that no civilian should
b. tried by niinry court. and tried tO force n
Democratic Senate to come to the Same concu-
sion. ami an adjournment took place in cOnBe-
pp,n'c without passing tho Army biz.
Mr. Garland asked what WIS Mr. Conklings
position upon these clauses previously; and
that gentleman. in the course Of his reply. asked
leave to refer tQ another point. He had listen
ed. h"said. to the Senator from Ohio when no
pronounced culOgy on the why in which they
drew lurics I'm the State Of OHIO. He had heard
many eulOgics upon tho Jurisprudence and
methods of justice in Ohio: but this lutt"r
~ learn that II was regardedas an honor 10y them
10 serve on lurlrs, 50 much. that they suuubhlc
happy hunting ground for Presidential cnn1i-
dates, and he know what general sntisfuctjun
ana pleasure had been gwen ~ resqrting there
Tor Surh q purpose. He Ind nm idea that it
would continue the favOrlte field for selecting
Pr.sld initial ,cnnlidnigs. and that there are
multtud"s of ahlr-hnilod men who had con-
scnird 10 serve the public in ulNnannor OF "a
partigs. high aud low. hut difnnt expect 10
hear that in OHIO the heat for on 90 had bc.
mon struggled for the opportunity 10 sit
upon jury lnusht"rl. having hoard this
%! luri's in tnW Stute. Nothing but sentiment
OF despair WITS inspired hv the sugso4tion thut
jurics cQnal 70 those OF Ohio. They could not
Gu it in Now York hcouurc tUr lnuiin iu that
place seakers md Jill not strive Co. break into
tine witness box iu order 10 guiu fhn honors unl
emoum"nis Of that distinguished position.
AOout o'clock Stanley Matthews got tho
nO1r ana Wuir % tremendous argument in tic.
fence oi the hepublican position. lis as-uiird
tory of ine last election in Hamilton County.
ONO AZ illustrative Of the manner iq
tbe b''" rur',y 'uf' ,bn b'"3R ,9"' F'7'TTTgGa Tga
ability Of Matthew'S has of course nj
cfl rl 90 hs in the Senate Inns boen at'all COM
parable % that OF this morning. f. was an clo-
Iurnl ana imlree' ive arEumcni. lie concluded
mituhe taste. II WIS ava iu-ilDni worthy To
note. that upon the conclusion of Matthew'S
spnc'h l. aine went over IL his scat ana warmly
coneratu uicd him. lle was the only Ropuhli-
can senator who did. but several Democrats
io.oW,d Bmlnc's example.
A. Matthews concluded. Thurman, who had
been asleep In the cloak room. and had como
ont only lr time 20 hear the conclusion % his
c'l'lEu' st",rn ros" 70 raplN, hut llu4r was
recognized. WIN more manne risW than huve
ever. -ern Conklng display lIoar pretended
lhni Doe lr- tutcd tO trouble the Senate at that
hour win few remarks. He hcstated, np,
pearei undecided. and Thurman manifested
some Impotence. md expressed his desire %
reply briefly - Matthews Hogr then con-
culcd to speak. and remarked that Thurman
had SPOKEN nt length and frequently.
Thurman sat down and lloar began. u was
eydontya wcll-c0nsidcred and carefully pre-
pared speech thUt he maie 1t was decidedly.
IN arrangement OF details and dictlOn. tho
speech OF the morning. II wns brioi enough to
Ice read, and the arraigument OF tho Democracy
contained m IL will tell upon the masses. There
was great d.al of flap doodle in X. but for all
hat It was effective.
II was 90 when the Senate took a recess until
10 o'clock. Tut Thurman's speech. the last NJ
the debate. was con luded at Z O'Clock. and an
hour and "a half nearly was consumed in voting
upon and wrangling over tho motion Thurman
had made that the Senate recedc from is dis
agreement 10 tho House provisions which the
conference committee had failed to agree upon.
The motion that the Committee reccde from
its position relative tO tne Legislative Dill wus
lost hy 80 nays 10 % yeas.
Mr.. Thurman then moved that the Senate
slrlkc ont from tho Amendment TO the House