National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-11-27

George F.Appleby for appellant and continued by
Mr.. Enoch Totem for appellee.
Adjourned until Monday at IL o CLOCK
district Courts.
SUPREME COURT or THB DrsTRtor-Wllson VS..
Gatchel decree below affirmed. Cruit VS.. DAVIS
decree below affirmed Howard G. Clagett was nd
mittcd to the bar, Morgan vs.. District OF Columbia
CIRCUIT CouRr No. i--JusrrcE wYLn.-Hayden
vs. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Company trial In
CIRcuiT CouRT No. 2--JusTfcE Cox.-IIuber OF
ux. vs.. Teubcr ct ux; trial still In progress.
Equity CoURr-JusTIcG NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.
burg VS.. Gordon; bill dismissed. Kaghn vs.
Kalghn; bill dismissed Hopkins VS.. Hopkins sale
ratified. Dauphin VS. Key; hearing on application
for injunction for December before the general
term. United States VS.. Smoot. all of the proceed
ings subsequent to the filing OF the original bill set
aside. Smith VS.. Spaids ct al; defendant Moses to
give bond for certain goods. Friday ana SATURDAY,
the remaining days of this term, Will be occupied
in hearing motions.
CRialSGL CoURT - JUSTICE HAoNER. Edward
NARROW, alias Babe Hawkins. resisting police OIL
Ger; guilty, notice OF n motion for new trial IN
arrest ofjudgment George Brown, perjury; set Tor
Tuesday next pcremptorily. Richard Ross, recciy-
Ing stolen property guilty motion for new lr,a IT.
the hearing of motions
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TOMORROW
SUPREME COURT or THE DfsrnfCr-CIiiEf-JusrGCE
CARTIER AND JusTicE JAMEs.-No. 12l Morgan VS..
District of Columbia; 123, Welcker vs.. National saw
ings Bank; 1891 Seal vs. Naor, l2j, National Metro
politan Bank vs.. Johnson; l26 Scheller VS.. clark;
i27 MCGOWAN vs.. Todd; l2s, Pullman VS. stevens;
1872 United States use Wilson VS.. Amos; 1888,
Welch vs.. Murphy.
CIRCUIT CouRr No. 1--JusrrcE wyTiE.-No. 65,
Phmnix Mutual Life Insurance Company VS..
Peugh; $40, Middleton & Co vs. Worch; $40, Chap
limo vs. Taylor SOL, Wood Darlington ct al; 4Of
First National Bank of Jeavenworth, Kansas, VS..
Rocssle & Son; i03 Beatty w. Whitaker; 100, Re-
public Fire Insurance Company VS. Bromhalt fU7,
Bodiu vs. Luckctt ct al. All TOlten VS.. wilson; ALB
Tobn VS.. Knights of ~. Patrick ii5, Godfrey Co.
VS.. Murtagh;ii7, Mississippi Central Railroad Com
pany vs.Taylor i2l Cockeyvs Austin CT nl i23 Polk
Unborn vs. Dyer CT al; i25 Block VS. Bcknap; 421,
Parker VS.. McChesney; 429. Guista VS.. Brown; 4S3
Dallour & Co. VS.. Baldwin.
CIRCUIT Court No. 2-JusrICE CoX.-APPEAI
Dock ET-No. 90, Hotzman VS.. District of Column
bia ITO, Bennett vs.. Wilson. Regular Cal
endar-No. 16 Armstrong VS.. Williams 100
Daley VS.. Trunnell go Childs VS.. Marks q
al. 4; 22S Washington Market Company vs.. Holt
| man; 5S. Huber ct ux. vs.. Teuber ct ux.; 81
Teuber ct INK. VS.. Huber Ell ux.; 50, Tucker aud
sherman va. Boston; 100. Clark VS.. scheller and
Pinkard; 49, Lemont VS.. W. 4 q. X. X.
Co.; 176. Archer VS.. Pratt 1873. Reside, agent
VS.. Lucas; l90 Thwing ct al vs. Dean ct al; 20S
French VS.. Mcpherson ct al; Oh, Davis Sons VS.
SmOot2S LiebbechutZ vs.. McNall; go, Patterson VS.
Moslor; 222 District of Columbia vs. Forsyth; 226
Bogue vs.. Cropey; 10. oNealys. District OF Colum.
bia; go, Wheeler VS.. Johnson 232 Northern Liberty
Market Company vs. Killian; 2i2, Truesdell, exc
cutor, Terry ct al: DAG Bridget Cornish 2iS
Hyatt vs.. futile; 465, Wagner & Co. vs. Benedic