, 1879-03-13

bcfois s tst 0u thnk '0r i os avermpropossi asI
TO hoF, 10 the hearing Of !csc witnesses, that II
rvo one-ha!f to thc natural hairs, then all these
proceedings against her ot n criminal nature
:hon1d ;hs BE- sapp'e'scd, Including tho complaint
"Ftsnk ,s';, enough" Interrupted The reporter.
"What did Mrs Underhtll aaY to thatt''
" he fact is she became futfmtdated-she
WAS already ack anil her ueryca completely un-
sttunE-a,d agreed to d. It; while they, on the
e,sedtngs. Ihcy Impressed upon her lhe caution
Mr. Woodbridge know anything ,about #.
sS:s cams ouasn as .o. "ss sss as s
and proper t1iat she should have counsel,
and totne one catne to my Office before arrived
the,c !h!s morning TO inform inc that Mrs. un-
Heights, and that Ind better go up there.
took the 0:8O train, found her there at Jusi,ce
Duhton'R Office and Immediately demanded
private consultation With her. Tile Justice con-
anctcu inc into private room, md haln't
been there long brforo
THAT acounDnxL or 4 CONSTABLE
thrust h!msell In anu refused to depart. I told
him h!a Intrusion Was IN tmpcrt!ucncc, but llo
Insisted on remaining, adding that Justice Dun
tor had told hin Ie might come f. tllsrs:
he had aatd any such thing. We were then left
alone while. and finally said would 60 to
tfial ~ ,4. On ING question:
Wbat aort of testimony was brought out IN
"hone ut oil. Mrs. DuckIand. vile Of The
co-executor, WIS one Of the witnesses rho tcati.
@1cd @ to ynrsous quarrefs between Mt. and sirs.
uhdefaIlI. They all drc" II pretty etrong, but
tnc Ioss,e1am1natfoh brought out The an(mus
OF II hli' asked Mrs. auckland ~feth-
M Snae'hil 3. oe! g., ti%a if'.'S''os ssues'9' Ha,s
ea M ia a.sed Gs her I ' rssa s es sfny a to ss M:
dcrl'iIl to d!ylt!e her property. 'Oh, no. was
her rep!y. Ihsn e. l asked hcr Y she dtnn't, on
an o. Maten. ls's, nay as much tn wrtt!nE.-
hnu l neIo the following letter In my hnntls,
which she evidently recognized, md which np'
pafcntly a1scomhtea her tn no small degrce:"
Dfar Mr.: ! think II suaan will take =
ttcnda adv!ce: hho would let the heirs taks ,hoir
tl9n'. anu sho 3es thsfdss Of II s!e dont. the law
n,n,raas e. W, Or e1 1nae @ ae hes oecn 70
en r,ns hn az. !, sss' nhe ~ nae nes 1nenas
sunnose yon wi hsrn ~, tnmh'inv ~ ,,1ors,
pretty thon 4. sHc told nc shc dated iieu the 5h
il. l. uuc.tAnp.
The nu,,e of t1,p lady to whom this foot'a
episte was addressed ia suppressed Tor tho sin1-
| pIe reason tI,af tn nuhIish Il
''~ ''@>0'' >''.r, Won, ~ g'. - 1,a 10 ANN
| ooA. ~ =" uoopi
nna neeanee tIe tsdy IA qucesson' - far %
,sMtneu, ,. took no oar. III hs,u hela no sYmpat1Y
"Afecttonate Frieud.n The cIostnr portion OF
the letter, wllich uay be rather unntclllefble ~
u Btahas, Was Simply eiutnty allnsl1n 70 the
Richard Grant Whltc would rcmnrl, is d "child-
Ing mother"
What did Mrs. Duck!a,ul haso to say to this
poeeri" inquired Tie reporter.
son! st.e.admtttcd that sue had stated what
claimed in writing. bccau,e very muuh confused,
md broku down completely. opur1lV de.
nounccd tle Whole proceeding as conspiracy TO
prosecution, antl then to compound a
charge Of felony in settling It. Mr.
Wilson immediately fasd lie had had nothing to
do about settltny It, but told him be np1ld
have 10 swear pretty hard before anybody would
bcleve that statement, lnusmucl, al s |iad filed
the bill to sct aside The will, ,atie tho affidavit
On which Tic criminal prosecution procccdetI
md the Constable he employed was lie acti7e
agent in pressing tls settlemcnt.a
"Was anythfng else donvl'
'..1he day waa taken 10 Ia the examination
~ NJ