The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1879-12-11

| there: was sOme( coy 1Io
asked before y a u '''
iracturedP |75V' &,
had been exte1. ge E
nced IT. on examina
fracture, and that b a ~.
minutes was lslk@d II he WYSidHS
l thought pot that extravaSatior
setting IN Ntis Was before erSmir
lnaue 10 sNneoy csoy the people; ewes w
OF me tim The was in much naiN NN
jerking OF ns muscles, anludicstIa, ,NVN
on the brain:do not think hs Nv 8
tcious, think he was partially oo,
not determine the degree Of consSASus
examination considered wounds fataI g4
'front.' OF MIN, and several were behind when be
saio u am been killed for: he said 1t distipot.
| ~, little above Whisper he went on buthIa
uIterance was indstinct, He made the nod when
asked htWo mad attacked him; he was seemingly
| Trying 10 say something all the time: signed my
examination testified in COulter's office In that
! examination the question was asked me- whether
Siter my examination, he said anything intellI-
siDleL said no; said he was partially uncon-
scious when got there; did not say he muttered
ana shook his head all the time: he only did that
after the examination: all they told ma tbey
thing about the word kill FIRST used that in the
Court house; there was no counsel present. and
was In hurryto attend an important case: Il
seemed to me very short examination: could
not say he was crazy or delirlous: would not con.
slider him regularly delirlous did notice signs Of
intelligence.
DR., George G. smith-Wss catled to see the man
little after the murder; he was unoonscon; had
cut over right eye and on back OF head; head
badly confused; wounds were dressed by DR..
Iressel this instrument would produce those
wounds; the stroke caused his death the wounds
were ragged and bruised, not done With shGEp
instrument; after this DR.. Smiths testimony Wag
substantially the same as the witness who pre-
ceded, with regard to the effect the blows would
have and further said that man with such
wounds as these we would ordinarily expect to
die; any blunt instrument might cause such IN
jury; these blows killed this man,
John Gillespie-LiVe In Alliance am editor and
postmaster; was at home on the 9th Of June:
heard Of the occurrence saw 0hr on the 2sth OF
June, Saturday, in the Lookup Kingqbury admit.
ted me; saw Mann hrst, Ohr was in an adjoining
CELL my attention was frst given to Mann, could
not see ohr; could not see him while talking 10
Mann; talked to ohr afterwRrd; Klngsbury intro
duced NE; said was the editor OF the newspaper
there. and that he, 0hr, could say what he WANT
ed said had just talked to his partner Mann
Ktngsbury did not go until went; had not seen
0hr before.
At this point the jury was ent to the WitnesI'
room, and John Garland called to the stand. Said
he was in the lookup Ike Reck let me in on the
afternoon Of the murder at Kingsbury's request:
Mann said to ohr that III they did prove 1t they
could not hang him, Ohr, as he was only II years
old; he said II 1t was proven they would 20 to the
Penitentlary; but not that one should receive q
greater punishment than the other nothing said
about two years in the House Of correction; never
told AmermGn that Mann said II 0hr would con
fess Mann would got Of, and 0hr would have but
q short sentence; had o conversation, but did not
tell him anything like that Mann and 0hr were
the men who were talking.
Jury brought back.
Gillespie to Jury-sRid to him talked to Mann
and he accuses you of doing the deed he said
that is true, am the one who did II, az near an
can statei they both agreed to kill the old man,
but when they came to do It the other weakened:
did not have the sand, and be did IT. told him II
was grave affair, and he should be very careful
what he said; said he realized the situation and
was prepared for the worst this was the day AFTER
the homicide; Kingsbury was not present; don't
think anybody else was in the lookup at the time;
Kingsbury was In the room.