The Phoenix herald., 1879-10-17
PORTER'S P0TPOURRI. Proceedings of the District
 Court. The Grand Jury Proceeding with
 Their Business.
MoNpAY, ocropER 1s, 1s79.

in regular term this day,a 10 c'slocl
 AM Hon. DeForest Porter, Judg
 presiding. Present: R. s. Thomas
 sheriff, and Francis A. Shaw, clerk
 The Sheriff was ordered to su m
 mons twenty-three county electors t
 appear.atthe Court House in Phenix
 Tuesday, October IA, to serve a
 Grand Jurors, and twelve count,
 electors 10 appear, at the same place
 andsserve as trial jurors
 On motion of J. T. Alsap, esq, J
 ". Stevenson, of California, kwas
 on certificate, admitted to practice a:
 an attorney in this Court.
 AC Lemon, esq, A. C.. Baker
 esq, and J. T. Alsap, esq. were ap-
 pointed board to zexamine candi
 ates for admission to the Bar of
 MaricoPa County.
 By order of the Court the calendar
 for the term was called.s
 On motion of A. D. Lemon, attor-
 ney for the plaintiff, the case of Mari copa county vs- Charles H. Veil was
 dismissed.
 On motion of William A. Han-
 cock, esq, J. T. Alsap, esq, was added as an attorney for the defence in the suit of Anna Maria Aiedrico vs William A. Hancock, and case setlfor trial on Tuesday, October 21-
 In the suit of w c. Streeter vs. Joseph Thalheimer. J. T. Alsap, esq. was, at his own request, added as an attorney for the defence
 On the motion of A. c. Baker, in the suit of Nellie St. Clair vs. c. C. Cox, it was ordered by the Court that the testimony of William Dike- man be opened by the clerk.
 In the suit of E. Weymouth vs- Samuel and Fleming Franklin, A. c. Baker, esq, attorney for the de- fence, moved, on filing the certifi- cate of the justice of the peace, that the appeal be dismissed, with costs to the appellant Hearing of argu- ment on motion to dismiss set for Tuesday, October 14, at 10 AM.
 In the suit of the County of Mari copa vs. John E. Naylor ct als, argu- ment on demurrer set for hearing on Tuesday, October II.
 On motion of John T. Alsap the suit of Francis A. Bashford vs. John A. aris Mary A. Chenworth was placed on the calendar, and, on second motion, was by the Court dis 
 On motion of 4. D. Lemon, esq, counsel for plaintiff, the suit of John Mullen vs. Charles R. Ayers was dis missed.
 On motion of A. D. Lemon. esq, counsel for plaintiff, the suit ot Chas. Goldman and Charles Altschul ys- The Golden Star Mining Company was dismissed.
 On motion of William A. Han cock, esq, counsel for plaintiff, the suit of F. L. Brill vs- J. H. Plerson ct al. was dismissed.
 On motion of A c. Baker esq, counsel for plaintiff, the suit of Helen A. Conrad vs. Charles c. Con rad was placed on the calendar, and she clerk ordered to enter defendants default, and the suit referred to Vim. Isaac to take testimony and report therein On motion of A. c. Baker, counsel Or plaintiff, the case of Ida J Cav hern vs. John F. Cawthern was placed on the calendar, and the de- 'endants default entered, and case eferred to William Isaac to take tes- imony and report therein.
 The court adjourned at 4P.M. until Tuesday, October IA, at 10 AM.
 TUESDAY, OCTOBER IA. Court opened pursuance to Mon I lays adjournment. Hon. De Forrest, Porter, Judge Presiding. Present: R. s. Thomas, Sheriff, y H c. Mcdonald, Under Sheriff; , nd Francis A. Shaw. Clerk { Minutes read and approved. a Proceedings: la the suit of Wey- C mouth vs. Samuel & Fleming Frank in, to dismiss was denied, after hear az argument of Council i In the suit for divorce of Alcimena I Iarris vs- Jacob B. Harris, Court q sndered a decree dissolving the ' Onds of matrimony, and giving the C ustody of the two children Rollin 1 nd Lenora Harris to their rD other. \ ne plaintiff. z The demurrer in the suit oi the |, crritory of Arizona vs. John E. Nay s IT ct als, was, after an argument, | ken under adyisement by the Court Demurrer in the suit of Ellis, Ash & Ce., Vs. The Griffin ditch Go, as, after argument, taken under ad- sement.
 The demurrer in the four suits Francis A. Bashford vs. Mary H. Toolsey, as administratrix of the es- te of King s. Woolse7 deceased. f, Id Mary H. Woclsey as defendant, ere submitted without argument ,, The case of Mattie s. Diaz, vs. VI dolph D. Diaz on motion of A. D. u emon entered o1 the calendar with .fendant's default, and referred to til 'm- Isaac to take testimony, and al port.
 In the suit of A. J. Stockton vs. NJ. eI Clanton. Judgment was given in ht vor of the plaintiff in the sum of '16. In the suit of Sarah Edgar, vs. The P, Io ,Iden Star Mining Co., judgment La pl ndered in favor of plaintiff for the '' m of S55. ho Tn the suit of s. ". Smith, vs. pc . e Gold n Star Mining Company. e re 'mIIrrer withdrawn and judgment at, a9 tered in accordance with the prayer ch