The Cincinnati daily star. [volume] ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) 1875-1880, 1879-03-19
The Courts.

Drunk-Wm. Burt, continued; Mary
Herold, So.
Disorderly Conduct-John Mack, Thomas
Conroy, continued; Thomas Pare, 80 days;
Henry Neimcyer dismissed.
Miscellaneous-Wm Campbell, attempt
ed rape, continued: Sidney Smith, assault
and battery, diSmissed Jacob Markline,
same s.; Thomas Barrett Timothy Keltv,
Frank Martin, petit larceny, 5000; Joseph
Baccoco, cutting with intent TO wound,
continued; Francis Lang burglary. cxamin-
alton waived; James Byron, abusing family,
dismissed VIM. Robinson, petit larceny,
dismissed; James kenan, assault with i'll
tent to kill, continued; Annie Belfoil, va
granCy, 10 days.
elias. II. and Emily NJ. Dart adopted a
child six months old named Mary g. Wea-
yer, in charge of the Cincinnati Orphan
Asylum.
SUPERIOR COURT.
The Home Building Association against
VIM. Russell. In this case, before Judge
Iaple, an action to recover damages against
q deiaulting treasurer, the jury returned a
verdict for plaintiff for $23, 022 IS.
COMMON PLEAS.
John Gerke's administrator vs. F. j.
Mayer. The petition states that Gerke was
elected Treasurer of Hamilton County. F..
J. Mayer, as Chief Deputy, had the sole
charge of the office. In Gerke's term there
was paid into the Treasury $l9,S22 70 more
than the duplicate called for. This was
made up of overs, double payments
and erroneous payments. When Gerke
went out of Office he called upon
Mayer TO refund TO various persons, and
during his life Mayer refunded to various
parties, but retained in his hands $4,000
for which sum suit is brought. Mayer filed
Il motion to make the petition more deli
mite and certain in this: He wishes to know
the names Of the parties who claim, and
the amounts claimed.
The Court said that Mayer was an en-
plove Of the Treasurer, and that none of
the money belonged to him, and that his
duty was to pay il over to his principal
whether il belonged to him or the county
Motion Overruled.
The administrator of JOhE Gerke against
4. J. Mayer This action was to compel the
defendant to render an account of certain
money which came into his hands as depu-
" under the late John Gerke, while The
latter WAS Treasurer Of this county. The
motion to require the petition TO be more
definite was OvCrruIed.
w. I. Forrest, assignee of John Brizzo-
lari, against J. Il. Cato and others. This
case came up before Judge Moore on the
appeal of j. b. Cato from all order of the
Probate Court, confirming sale of real es-
tate. Gatto's motion was overruled. Judge
Moore granted the motion to set aside the
confirmation of sale.
TO-MORROW'S CALENDAR
The eases set for tomorrow Thursday are as
follows:
COMMON PLEAS.
Before Judge Longworth.
81 27s-Thc Columbia & New Richmond Turn
pike Go. vs. The Cincinnati d. Portsmouth Rail
road Co.
3I,g32-Charlotte u Munstermann vs Jacob wcmer
GI Ill.
i22l3-A. A. Rauch vs. Catherine Flag and John
Flag
4&,2l2-Otto Z. Miller vs. W. H. Norris.
Before Judge Moore. ,..
sc 336-C haries Bodman Il Go. vs.. o. F. S. Fee
d Go.
5j.337 D. W. Van Dyke vs.. II. II. Macko ct al.
Ni,:42-E. NJ. Spangenberg vs. Joseph Mcln ct al.
aT,A3-H 7. Ambrose VS. NJ. 7. Farrell ct H.
Gii-Snme VS.. same.
;N,;!j3-- Middleport Woollen Mills vs.. Block &
PUiIak.
&&5i-J. B. Doppes vs.. F. J. Britton & Co.
5G,3j7-tteolgo T. Clements vs.. r. Al. Bishop 4
Co, ct al.
jG.3G2-Dclaney & Gerke VS.. the CltV OF Ciuciu-
matt.
5G,37i-Joscph Francis Finch VS. Anna Maria
EigC!.
fI6.355-Same vs.. same
5i,S93- William Il. Parker VS.. Frederick Buhr-
lagc and Joseph Stanter.
jG,3tC. n. Parnel vs. A. IL. Spatford ana Gao
line L. stowe.
56,45O-Wiliam Stichtenoth VS.. J. W. siblcy 4
Co,
55,t59-Leonard Bauer vs. Henry LQln and
wife
5jl53-Beyerly b. Bower VS.. Mary G. Jones ct al.
Before Judge Smith.
5ll19-Iamcs s. rrmble vs.. J, NJ Mccullough
& Sons.
5lll3-Thc Cincinnati Hotel Company vs.. Hen
ry pearce ct al.
IIi9-Jacob Beper vs.. Catherine and joseph
PeeISman. =
Sl.l57-Gustav Tsfel vs.. Henry Gucbe
3lI9-John 2. Epply VS.. John kramer.
81 lPEEIoE COURT.
Before Judge Yaple.
So, S,7ls-Horace G. Wilson VS.. The City OF iCincln-
lat.
81, 726- Buchanan, Robinson K 90, vs. The
lfttsbury, Cincinnati 4 81. Louis K. r. UP
SO, 752- Ryan & Doogun vs.. The United Railroad
stock Yard Company .-.. ....
Before Judge Harmon.
3i,12l-Lotis Frcyhof vs., The Ohio Farm
ITS Insurance Company.
%, 2a,369-Frederick weserman VS.. The City OF
'incinnat.
29,17j-Samc VS.. same
... Before Judge Force.
Sc, ,a07-Walter Dixon vs. James Mcdonald ct al |
33.226-1he Champion Fire Extmguisher Com
ANY vs. Alfred Hopper ct al.
IS, ,266-James Kennedy VS.. The Cincinnati Mu- |
ual Gonsume1s Ice Company. NsI
J3 sc. Klein 4 Go. VS.. Elizabeth Gambs
sSS5s--Amelia L. Dixon vs. Patricl; N. % Brier |
336l- Emeline I.ullX vs. joseph II Redmond |