New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1879-10-04
ARGrMrNI OF ME-. srorGH1ov.


Commissioner. DO look SO the Democratic party Will
zsriou ald A. whole. aud to seI'ot from thr pa ~
wlfnouf -prct 10 local lssics llt opinion
bv fhis superior tribunal to its mfori0r ir-
bunaI. when might follow 10 or might moi. The
uI' rno,~r - Tmmauy Hail ror tn conape rfself 10
lie Organization known as Irving Hail. ouf 10 select
- Nh opinon Of The court prescribed - -tain
course not suggested H. and De submitted that SO was
q N'D'1 ~ r-f,,.e rfirr'v T. obey n
NJ stoueaton reviewed toe facts u the Boards
c,nsuce with opinion of The court ana sad that,
renewing or ~ lha qaiobiing hrown into Il by
10 r-ors undertook 10 hold respectable men OF
I'M. community 10 rdiculc ana after having nominated
Tor place. turn round ana SOY - aoLt sno% ~
NIX these persons To- ha'r ndcnie cas upon
thrm-when a refsoL OF mat sort wac FOUND rims
with most spon-Ihe pun dutv. 70 WAS the duty OF
TINS Court remind such person thai there ~ss sN
above him and -nnuLa Vim co"I &c Az -
trinueuce enough 10 enforce H. Tbs BOald ~ folre
charged with the administration oi m.st EihNs
l functions. amongst .utm D'lN- lh7 car ol P'ota
| trtg aud the protection OF QUEENS ana yer que
| of fwo " them ccre found WliAuui house - Lon
hurr. Ar could effer property which thief could
faE. one would think at such person. 10 ever III
coupe eL1 neX E1eucec, OF however At.ie he coun
lay clam 10 sclhs soiiu oi-r y, - 49,, -, ,es
protect wnu al least r careful % perform h- durs
ov dd he reInse 10 perform his duty, clearly sapWD o.
HIM out now pGi forward claim 10 having performed
H. In HE afd IT Charles F. Ma Lean SAN mat IL was
not the Board " Police had refused 90 wholly 'Acu
select persons n INSPECTORS OF ercuon
I
Democracy. but said. Oh the contrary that the snid
Board du select than 700 persons 10 b. INSPECTORS
OF the great Democratic party III ~ RELATIONS
10 : Ate Issues He simply said they had appointed
-oe" belonging 10 that Democratic Orcaulzatuu, hot
mentioning how MANY or II they not DelouE 80 the
oner orrnni zation. NOW" the OInsal askru. lat
does he mean. aud what does be- iltendf WAT opinion
d es ne give you page sIxiy-nve OF III ahcstlti
| n ne: lac has none. He guided D. the trembling
| dng,r OF "a feeble and almost paraiyzrd hand ana nc
| doe. exactlyt that nnEer points out That
| he should do" Laughter. The Vuole perform
| snces OF the Police Board during the last
few DAYS had been supply aisRraeeu aud tie -pfak-r
commended the lad gment seifrspect o. The two
genomen who decued 10 be lolse prt or parcel al The
business.
| M srouehron then read the afdavts Of Mcssrs.
French ana Wheeler and showed ho~ each had atrVen
10 do hs uiv and carry out the law, aud the peristH
opposfion they had encountered II h"ee persons, he
said of niue intelligence and less honesty, Vlo raised
-, ofInustf1n had assisted IN obcvng the mandate n
th Court the present proceedings woud have been IN
necessary.
ARGUMENT OF Mr.. BANGS.
NJ Bangs explained that he appeared In place OF
corportloa Counsel Whitney. who had beer absent for
week or ten days for and nsunable rec E.
| auop." He (Mr BaDgsl had idea whether AT Root
appeared IN support against the application for man
drnns and should glad II the Court would order that
Gentleman TO say what he had TO say al this point
Mr. Root stated al length how he came 10 appear for
uessrs wheeler and French. and how their action Ia
t,. matter was dametrcay opposed TO that Of Msss's