New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1879-03-21
LEGAL NoIlces.

hero tO All aud
Giin- against HENRY srr RCKE lately dong business o.
the CITY Of York that they required 70 present Their
crbef the Assignee said stnrcse OF business
nos i9% and 10 Chsm6ersstre9t on or before
W. T. BIRDsALL Attorney. FIJI lsw6wFn
NOTICE.-Unted States of America.-In the
y Circuit Court Of the United states for the Fifth Circuit
No. Io-sAMUEL A. sTRAsG
THE MQ y i "; AN and nJ E y
No 2-MAsoN IYGGUNG and others ~ ~ - =
THE MQxTqoMERY and EyTAULA
Under by virtue OF decree entered on the 80 day
otJuy a. d. is IN the above causes which were eOh.9
cause on the go day OF Fe3ruary d. ls9 the under
that aeora9ce With the proy99s OF said deere they
Artesan Basin in the city Of Montgomery State Of
Aabams. bet-sen noon and O'Clock n 81 hs day Pro
raj road o. Ihe .ad The MontgomeTy and Entaaa Rail
immunites Of said Company aad all the property OF
sail Comphny inc,aIns ROAD be right OF way way
and Of every description her with all The
INV & wRntever The purchaser at such sale
proceeds Of such sale order and the eI
SAID deceas on the purchasers compliance with the terms
arce viii be evecute 10 the purchased vcsing said plr
chaser .. me ~ e. 10Th IN law ana 'au Ia ar .q
AMI franchises 50 sold
MOE s0-'S'' iio ts Pr Y. -R!MMIcK,} Master
ROBERT ". HEALI 3C0nlmisslonerS
F. 81 dRA tD5h2 ard solicitors for Compartments
ji y! i. 4 IH8FFTzcLAw' ''a'A
SUPREME COURT, ERIE C0UNTY,-Ros-
- well :. Burrows, Edward f. Hendrlck Ed%aId Whte-
and Joseph Varnum IN their own behalf and IN be-
ha Of an Others having Ike interest who may become
s S 3 aSn h G a6Ga S2a
I6e as; wi and stamen Of the SAID Albert il Tracy de-
ceased the soc koa's or ueir TPTSsea a
t. AL persons having claims a4ainst Sad
receiver heretofo appointed in action which petition
February "a 1879 order was duy made N the sad
Ere, at the CITY and County Hall the CITY Of
Justse siding requiring that any, be shown
Comfy 81 ETe in the City County Hal The CITY d.
BG TO- On d hs 2 On day Soon as counsel cam be
heard why the said receiver should not pay out Of the funds
per cent on the stock OF the said Buao LOckpor
Of nj c6mpSay And was further ordered hat no sum
Gent TO the be tnen shown at said time and
i s ia TanST aid Teceivershp NAV be- trmin
SAID receiver discharged Thst sad petition was
Of he on 5P Of Ere on the 2 dST OF February l57S
Dated Buffalo February ~ l2ly.propo,,,. pooo.u.-
BURROWS YIELE, Attorneys for SAID keeeiver, IA
Main-St Buffalo. y.
WILLIAM NICHOLS, New-York Supreme
{SFS coany44MQs II ALhIXG and cI ia
named defendant You are hereby summoned % answer inc
complaint in is acton and To- srrye COPY OF yogr answer
vice Of tins summons exclusive OF 6f such service,
and m failure TO appear answer Judgment viii
gan,t You cefau ior tie demanded N the
complaint Dated New YORK, Feb. ~, 1879.
FRANCIS G. REED
Plaintiffs Attorney.
Office and Post Office address 3i5 Brosdway y. i.
To WILLIAM NICHOLS defendant The foregoing sum
mons serve! upon you by publication pursuant TO an
Of Hon Charles Donohue Justice OF the supreme
New York dated the 18th day OF Febu
ary filed with the IN this action, in the
CLERK OF the city and County Of at The
said CRY the 2Oth 81 February, 1873
Dated y ew York Feb. IL 1879. FRANCIS G. REED.
Pl.ut,as Attorney. J46 broadway New.i0rA City.
F2i laH6HFu