The New York herald., 1879-12-02

and taking tin pail started toward the spring
Hayden was then at the front gate; saw her 80
along do wn the road toward the spring. and pretty
soon HAYDEN drove along after her; when she -e-
turned from the spring had conversation with
her.
with at the spring. and what about?
This objected to. and the judges held it under
adyisement.
Continuing. witness said Mary did not go away
from the house again between this time aud tho
hour when she lett the house the time alive;
at dinner Mary ate only mouthful, and went away
O. Did she tell you where she was going who she
Mr.. watrous-We object.
Q. What did she take with her when she went?
witness-She took a towel from the bureau in the
front room.
Q. Did she say for what purpose?
THIS objected to.
Witness continuing said that Mary put tho article
ia her dress pocket lit was found there after her
A question as to the particular use for which
towels OF this kind were designed WAS objected to.
but the Court admitted the testimony and it was
given.
Continuing, witness testified that Mary went of
to the woods between one and two o'clock; half an
to dinner with the family started of down the road
homeward; he is an old man, sixty years of ages
q few moments after Mary left; he came back after
two o'clock. and the sky cloudng over he went back
to rake his hay: he stayed until about four. when
rain began coming to the house, he started
kook Mary, going across the road up into the
woods and was absent fifteen minutes; he went
again some time later I having started into the
woods to look for her. he called me back and went
himself; l first heard OF Mary's murder about five
O'Clock that afternoon, and late s pight inquest
held ut my house, Heary E. Stone was one of
the jurors.
Q. Did you tell him the othcr jurors tho diff
ferent statements that Mary made to you Sunday,
Monday and Tuesday. including what she said just
before she went away from the house for the last
time?
The witness not required to answer this ques-
ton at this time, another regarding her commu-
nication of Mary's story to Mrs. Mills neighbor,
with the addition of the name of the person Mary
was to meet in the woods. These and the several
questions above given objected to put merely
for the purpose OF submitting them to the Court for
rulings the admissibility of the evidence which
they would cover.
at ak o'clock the Court adjourned, and in the
questions. Others OF similar nature to follow.
Taken altogether these questions are of great i'm
portance, for upon the testimony which they will
elicit the State largely relies for proving the motive
for the crime.
THOSE BRoGAN PRINTS THE CHEEK.
Your correspondent interviewed Judge Harrison
to- night the probability Of the rentroduction by
on Mary Stannards cheek. He stated that the pros
ecution had concluded that the feature had been
abandoned in the emergency previously explained in
these dispatches, the State would not volunteer
reintroduction. However. some of Hayden's friends
claim that wrong was done in having placed before
the jury the testimony of one OF the States experts
without giving the defence opportunity for
said that in this Of the the State was pre-
pared to rentroduce the subject ii Haydens counsel
demanded it a matter of justice to the accused.
However, he believed 1t unlikely that they would.