The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1879-07-01

sss int ast L Mo bssis
state ot one o. hat we W. va Of COW Aigned on
q ~ ! as s, nts III oaatins ;Tr@aq On mott;
mn now aswhat areat considara,,
RS ofea s.,ips, ana the, Eve Or debt Was y
y ~ = opens uthing q - tng 1mtnedla..9
I eonsl. w, most D 'nAN tav,aer Deegatt
Esinat S tGs sa9s so o@ y State AUD
nrn cane. risngaEs oil Of planted July inter
n an ever beforth target s,a,uasry pros Pendin!
,ent Of 81 most ssSer pIost,e plantsaI, Gonventi'
No sir, WE are n'pd, I'd and ing at 10
nrasaad In language aaTs sAaviews 80
bbroed. BY one ot Louisste kSsosssons, the
Hon. Don Caffrey q y; haseNA prevail,
and ear ylsWs vet Waver tg The
"maestion. such spes.en az a,t Z, be care
fully thas f nas de daN ,ei,na es
pressed pr tha no Nest est heritage tbet ven TO
those e ,ne that f, follow Us and wpo fed 10 patti
after years 20 ueratjt Eug
we now have n1hI4s as he admonl nausel Alvi
nope w .a Tlr We give the 10 stab steam
and rehes ,. pe If our State. ] WSecially Sch
pree tno rs sha a1hpeda BY the prei Jo
b y their e constituents 70 Judge s,a ,1tsand
point In which they % .d no hos bee tts.lp ne
WIN WIN t netnre and character OF W since W
their attention has e on NOR ,ioilea ~ ton
4 I'd n east LH6lE Sphef llOb
th -. own convictions; not az tls .onth- peti
{ niece Of their electors on1 Us nioAA wit
y WHO know their rights;
g. And Knowing, dare maintalh bu:
i Let them, conscious o. tne aa pfWitqhs, an
d otnrn In their constituents. anu ~ 90 he
retu th - Ia thew be called to hem Il;
ny n th 1ain Wor "a .n Of the Immortal Buthen on
similarly aiuaten l AKIN w. - the "a 70
M Mi / iid not obeN vouf ushnsf.oicon-
! formed to the instructions OF tratn AZURE. b
a a,aians A REPRESENTATIVE that was W Of
1 vnn o,pht TO be q person q Judgment "a TO /
q IIonk, indeed, to your opinions but to IN
ions as you and must have five yearpce.
iva ras not to look OF the flash Of the day Jew
: HAT All YOU chose me in my place a.oath
others to DO a pillar ~ ne jSt0ie, anut
q weathereoek on the top Of the edli.ee stnano
# mse hi to indicate the shittngs Of eyetsh-
: Iienabe gale .a tint 1,assaf
y tho Inns Of the honorable gentleman tsoGt.
y Mary. I especially ratify that poTt,on Wna9le
80 boldly and foreibly takes the position thlt
y does not lie IN the province q thls Uonvahn
at And even Ii we had, how monstrous doGtft
3 to suppose that any power In a.. re I,1 y
y government could take from III p.t
O. Observation-Disclosures ,s have not had before this Oon#
i, Now Mr.. President, as Il may De SUD posed
Of SOM. nat i, nav have pocket interest In {
speH tar desire 10 say that Do not own 20
ne but have large propeIaya vi IS NC renudi
so leve WI, = am one OF the few that desite 20
te taxed to pay the honest dept o. ,ni airect
n nnlv interest have In bonds = ~ , in n
ed bayinp through au error OF !t1.'e n'en 49, -
be 1 nast Mieebolls Government came into power
on vised az director in two q uui onnsn,s
ID nnratiops the purchase OF Sla's 19 u,hieh
he es a permanent investment. aho "nion
= u Mr.. President, my pride. not my poe"e
CIV 'o II the able address OF my eolleag :
ON a III ,as ha has shown US that ~
led H lsgaiIv Escape the payment
on also BY 4 RfD sz.,91tptar fion lif.!sl
LDsna1 economy to enable Vi
5pbhy $12 900 600, but IN alter years to
nj back and remember with establishment
,ent such doubt was ever discussed in the Coz
,ga ton Of 1879.
lge, / hope, therefore,, Mr.. President. that
ons proposition may be presented, looking
OK equitable adjustment Of this question, tina
!. command the almost unanimous vote OF
t as the State State whose credit fn the ,dS
ID 1t our fathers when large portion Oft this det
lbIe contracted stood first among her sister sti
sr guarantees her obligations at any cost. 0
u 10 broad face of that seal Louisiana. throug
i r. emblem is maintaining, life ia her offspri
flve the price of her hearts best blood.
Such Is the proud seal that our fathers I
ZEN ed to with pride-ft emblem Of louisiana
tory. And yet to dry Louisianas sous. /
the face OF ali her proud traditions, would
q ~ this ineffaceable blot on her escutcheon.
. nor or Mr.. President and gentlemen. | canr
! 90 n, will not believe It,
able able Delegate Simon opposed the amendm
soio He believed that nothing less than sc
the OF flity cents on tne doilaf Wo 'ie she,s
the people VI e1taht eHoAi Wig hei'9' "t.oh
der necessary.
o ON. Delegate Stone did not intend to say
cont thing more upon the subject OF the debt
na.I he could not sit still and hear gentl
md pirate about the faith and honor Of the
+ ri and denounce as regulators all who die
= y agree with them, when they themselves
lose In favor Of cutting into and repudiatin
NOR interest of the debt. He denounced the {
, ,ip - ment that he was q Reputation He di
ra a. believe the debt was honest and q D
j, ho charge upon the people. Gentlemen VIII
th ~, claim to SO believe, and yet favored n Gu
rnz of the rate of interest, were the true rep
mid tors. Although he was In favor of Il con
I : not contain the words Of the CONSTITUTE
-, ,nIa Georgia quoted ut the beginning Of Del
!, ~ Cunninghams substitute,
MID Delegate King thought there was a
Ill distinction between those who favore
ron, pudiatiOn OF any part Of the prlnclpa
nttv those who favored II reduction OF the int
rnn. The latter was q compromise with the
heir holders, who were willing to accept it.
liar Delegate Phelps. who was alluded
Delegate King as the gentleman from :
e Of ne had received the information thai
the bondhoders were willing to accepta
aitH rate OF interest, Sal1 ne 1hu feGelVru ltle
the nation from bank presidents aud other
ting ers of bonds that the reduction OF I'M
In would be acceptable TO them.
our Delegate George favored ths hinenHI
in The Democratic party was pledged tc
lake the face OF the debt, and that pledge s.
apa- be maintained The condition Of the pr
peo- however, demanded reduction Of the b.
fact Of taxation, and the adoption 81 the al
and ments would give them the fellfi Ihey
ade for. There should be no further CHI
!, do against members as regulators. Iraet
ould there was no difference between those
the favored the majority report and those
Iiga- favored the minority. one favored q I