New-York tribune., 1879-12-23
TALKS WITH PERSONS INTERESTED.

TALKS WITH PERSONS INTERESTED.
WILLIAM HoGENcAMP NOW THE OWNER or THE
MINE NEAR SAN CARLOS - STATEMENT OF
CHARLES d. DEsnLER-AGgNT HART's RECON-
MENDATIoNs.
The account printed in TIE TRIBUNE yes
erday the connected With the purchase
OF silver mine the Indian Reservation Of san Car
los Arizona, and of the in which the mine IS
alleged to have been obtained at low price, was the oe
casion of a good deal OF comment yesterday.
William Hogencamp. president Of the Second National
Bank of Jersey City, the present owner OF the mine
said a TRIBUNE reporter: The mine, which covers
about l. 800 feet, is my individual property The
deed was made out in the of Charles ID. Deshler
for the sake Of convenience He Is friend OF mine ana
a welknOwn resident OF New-Iersey lie transferred the
deed to within a very short time. Thus far hold
it personally and individually. With reference to the
manner III which the mine obtained, know nothing
Neither Commissioner Hayt nor Inspector Hammond
has anything to do with the NINE at present have
bought and paid for H. and long as have come by
il honestly do not that the transaction is any busa
ness of the public"
Charles j. Deshler whose name used In the pur-
chase Of the mine, is secretary of the United States
Dairy Company. lie said: The first knew OF the
matter was when was told that piece OF property in
Arizona had been purchased I'm my name was sur
prsed, naturally, but decided 20 place no obsttuc-
tions in the way on the understanding that
was not to be made responsible Tor any
money liability. The understanding was that
n company was 10 he formed. and was under the inn
preston that agent the ground did not know in
whose name TO vest the property. and mine was sug
gested transferred the property in short time, hut
forgot whether 1t was to Mr. Hogencamp or to COM
panv The transactions before the property came into
nv name know nothing about. had not been CON
suited. / considered that the property had been made
over TO me as temporary rlst and therefore placed
obstacles in the way understand that specimens OF
the submitted 10 expert In minerals ana IL
was because OF his favorable report that the purchase
was made. The United states Dairy Company is not Com,
missioner Hoyt's company We consider MIN valued
stakeholder and trustee, bur he only owns zoo shares
out of total Of 1900, the company cannot fairly be
called his" -
J. Nj Ferris secretary of the Board OF Foreign Mis-
sions of the Reformed Church SAID 4" The In
dian agent alluded TO is Mf. Henry L. Hart, who was
apponted from Constitution Ohio, in April, 1877. lie
was nominated by the Board OF Foreign MISSIONS, ana
was appointed He brought with him very hign recon-
mendations as man OF good character ana business
ability. In The Autumn of 1873 Mr.. Hart rendered bis
resignation. lie was requested 10 withdraw n anu dd
So Early I'm present the Board of Missions re-
ceved Information from Washington that Tue pace
would soon be vncant. aud 1t was desired that some
one he nominated lr the vacancy. The Board knew
nothing the charges against Agent Hart, nor has
ever beeu informed what they We knew that the
mower of summary removal vested In the Depart
ment at Washington, but 1t Il bad thing
take the position under these circumstances We
would like TO have Mr. Hart given chance TO bc
heard. lie highly recommended tDat we tRink
he is entitled TO a hearing
A gentleman connected with the Board OF Foreign
Missions of the Reformed Church, saiu thai there
was very great dissatisfaction among the religious
societies with the working OF the Indian Department
Men whom these societies believed TO be competent ana
upright lad removed without any opportunity 10
defend themselves Several OF the religious societies
had about concluded to withdraw from connection win
Indian afirs OF these things In the meetings
satisfaction was expressed, and there strong dis
position 10 withdraw.