New-York tribune., 1879-03-29
one of the interviews excluded under the ruling Of the

Moderator
DIR. spear-we did not know that hadnt .ne anc re
moes idea that in this surreptitious, canoesno anu
Mr Foote-I call the brother to order. He has no
right TO accuse the brother in that way. for ,h.
defence are concerned practically clsndestine
long discussion ensued, whioh was npay G i,9ht
mated by the mOderators saying that under the new
that had come in a new decision was needed, and ne
should exercise his privilege and throw tne
ineiy taken on the question of the admission ot the
evidence and IL was decided TO admit IL; l. .o,,o,
The witness accordingly read the article IN que''io
MIR. rALMAGE's vALEDICToRY.
n vbcn Won saw Mr. Talmage's farewell editorial
what was your Judgment OF it, Any impression was
that il was to use n familiar phrase pun OF 1he o
r1nn, that II would work injury TO The Chrst'd" de
Work necessarily. ~
Q-Had you any good reason TO believe that Dr' lar
mage had inserted the valedctory and the adVer''o
mentl Al had.
o-Wnat WAS that reasoni A.-The reason that the
one referred TO the other and both were written III
style which indicated Dr. Talmage as the author ord
IN he Insertion of that advertisement and valedic0ry
by Dr Talmage. Have these facts or Impressions
oRtfter the withdrawal OF DR.. Tamsge, was there
anv modification OF the agreement between you anu i
Odd Won know that Mr.. Hallock was negotiating
with Dr. falmage in the days previ0ns to me SAFE SAFE
ton that he was not negotiating with Dr. ia mage.
o-Did Won have reason to believe that tue ssie OF
mage Al did have, for the reason that he had "Il
ten ndorsIng in very strong terms MI hallocS a.
suitable man Tor publisher, and from the kho"leuso
also as learn from Mr. Hallock, that he had been per-
sonaly solicited by Dr. Talmage 10 take the paper 10,
Odd you have any reason to believe tha mT' III
msge's interests would suffer in any way from MT. ha
lock Al did not On the Other han1' naa re reaIJn h
10 pay him better salary than certainly coud H9fu M
pay at that tme that Is from the pfoeeeus Vi ''
pVoIwhy did you insert that advertisement by A. L.
Ford Al did not insert 1T, 1t, orr connivoncc IL Won
will take that WORD Alt was inserted win the vie"
of obtaining purchaser Tor the napeT ,orm1 Al
do moi know what purpOse-what may have influenced
Mr Affords mind only know tha II Is ln D4s bi,a sS
matters very frequent occurrence hat persons hNIus
property which they desire to sell advertise u uhuei All
assumed name ,
are placed standing here before God and under oath
do you stale that you III your sOu SO Lar as ou
your own mind, utterly unconscious OF ever hNlhs
intentionally wronged Dr.. TalmaSef Al am 49,,
The counsel for the prosecution announced tnat ,Rey @
deferred nnul Monday Mr. Mllard stating tnat he
asked matter of courtesy, as lie was fecnE very
uUwell. ,. -.
and MI crosby added his objection TO that OF the wit
ness and Dr. Van Dyke quoted the book TO show tDat
the examination should proceed continuously
DIR. SPEAR HARASSED.
The Moderator decided that the examination must
continue.
BY Dr. spear-YOu said moment ago that you did not
regard Dr. Tamage's withdrawal from The Christian
at Work as working any harm to you Al did not
Oft did not inure the paper at all At was not
my paper after his withdrawal.
O-suppose il had continued to DO your paperi A
do not know that 1t would have resulted in any pecu
mary damage.
objection was interpOsed TO the witness being asked
suppositious questions Objection sustained.
O,-Would II have been IT, the pecuniary damage Ot
the paper under the admin stratlon OF Mr. HhiocRi
Same objection and ruling.
Q-Y0u said you were not injured. but indignant at
hi. vii Al al made lUulguIutt -
n tbOus nd dollars TO meet tie salaries Ol D
Talmagc and Mr.. Corwin while they were connected
with the paper-pract cay. as told Dr. Talmage. pay
ing his salary out OF pocket as lie knew ana knew
that the paper could pay IT: ana after meeting the
expenses and the burdens connected with the paper az
long as had felt aud believe nad reason to feel III
the manner he did under all those circumstances.
QYou were negotiating on October for the sale OF
the paper were YOU not A.--NO. sir 80
O.-Nith Mr.. HdllOck I A.-NO, sill; not on the 9th
According to my recollection was the FRIDAY or sat
2Ifou d. intended TO sol ana transfer tue p'''[' A.
QIDia you converse with Dr. Tamasc about it at all
Q-Wnat made you indignant, then, that he should
Withdraw from the paper which you were about about 70
because of circumstances connected with II, which
wsrs s e4 m @nd ce to Al do
moi know that there is occasion for reply ing 10 that
Objected 10 AS having been gone over before
o. ask you what was he Indebtedness or inc papcrI
A.-Thcre floating Indebtedness OF about S2oOOO
Q.-Mhen Dr. Ialmage lett A,Lles, slr - oo,no .,
the paperl Al 60 not remember He came IN 1873.
Though interested in The paper, had niue or nothing
do with II al that time, ana am unable 10 say
BY Mr. McCuilagh-Was 1t lncreasedf I A-Aiter Dr.
TalmaYe came IN
Tne examination oi Mr.. Remington was here closed.
A committee OF two ministers and one eder-I)r. Hal
scy Mr. Sherwood and Mr. Hazard-were appointed
coGtumnciOns witnesses, and after some further bus
ness, The session was adjourned until Monday.