New-York tribune., 1879-04-22
Tmr RAILROAD COMPANY.

DECIDED-SFTTLEMENr AND PHF-EMPiIOS OF
LANDS oN THE LSE OF TIE UNION PACIFIC
RAILWAY COMPANY--A DECISION l.; FAVOR OF
THE RAILROAD COMPANY.
WAsHGNGTON, April 2l-The following were the
No olI-Ihc Denver aut no Granae Railway Company
si2Ine same agtthe Canyon city and Juan Rail.
giS y3y 29 54 ins o a o of cas n70Ta the
eonctng claims OF cer@a Ia.roads tHolEh % ias ,raPa @
motions Of the Atchsou Topeka sll santa Fe Railroad Com.
s arc recognizing ic h u the directors OF The
of Jnns 8 1872 gave 2 present beneficial easement
IN lie way granted through The eahyon capable
CANYON n good f for ra-,a6 yTpo.es sa6 aPploR
and Court below red in not rrc2egizng the prior
right OF that company IN tA5 Wy tI0sgn ,o ey ny o. n t
Cy Company om proc eeanE in ne construction Of It's road
extension Of time syen 5y me act ot M the Denver IQ
subject 70 iho provisions othe act oi March . when sayea
tigAt of way 60 any ratsH muy yJ IJiygS" @ AI C' 'o
ocaie Athou.r The PROV aht the Denver Company s
recognized the Court holds that ~ 70 those portions OF the
ION and Of more rs ole road bed ana track tie
ej u tho Canyon city company TO use snch road bed and
byproper orders upon such terms be equita6e
of ts track in GOOD orer Both Mr.
Justice liar delivered tAe opinion OF the Courts Chief
No. s55.wiam II. Pati. appellant. agt the UnIon Pa.
Court II he United states i,r me bTc, OK
settler ne Is duly qualiuod nav ut toh p lt ACT
ir ~ Sc oct rfsr 10 r~ovies ha- al lands Srar ed
therein which shall not be sold disposed Of ~ sail COM
roa3 shl be subject to settlement ana preeur,ion Ike
painu error to make setuemeut and preemptin under
l 1 ,1 % ts so Or sirh The maanns S Of the
aat n & W er I6t now liable to Trasmpton Upon refer
the TIE iEtor department IN ISIS, secre
thnty t at Ua. IAN ectua smrirnier of Ute
that the mortgage oi Ioo! was not Sn'h Surien
emon This CSg h9d. g. ~ a opinion Gty geyeL.q gy Jq M
presumed 10 used worls or pm pose The phrase
,r disposed OF must therefore aye som ds,nctyg mean
yous ot using the LANDS Tor the construction Of the
tins in the Courts opinion. was what intended by tae
phrase or disposed u" - titlls9sheI rom sga' NO
rosi and no Other is ,or;eiyable II tits was the
intention " Congress na TO believe that only limited
Htereet IN me 4n3 vs. M 40 y4 Ue ii ] tSr gaaT az
after the pcuOn O the road ~ would nave Doend ypotn
thrce wears ~ and prOfeted By Congress
ab2rren g.t LooAhs al me G"f,cSi o. ~ sS m anus t aIt
enough money could not have been raised on the credit
fcais ' ihe manifest Intention ot Congress- and cannot
be accepted its urse IN opP's ST. no ,' VI oI'T Win e r
puguant TO the goye[nnenai policy OF GuaIIE "%stnsI %
ipGi,nals But hi, policy vas Ingniesty subordinate
the nshr o0fS5 d Of d iays az m fsa grant 80 S
the quantity OF land wi the company might sen 70
or dispose grant al it, pleasure ~ ~ ,hs Court
Sans Of he company to Be used for The road
the progressed sgy secondary pohey %nlch 'he
also hal Ia view ought not 10 De al
lowed 10 eubatrisS defeat that whlch primary con
strung the last clause u the third section Oi The
ar in connection with al the other provisions
every part and regarding ne spirit a. WcH
"a lie letter this Court Is constrained 20 hod that the mort
gage st7 was ~ the lands morgagtd thn the
meaning statute and mat consequently the trdc o
complainant not open 10 pformpton
when he undertook preempt H. e has, Therefore, 10
equitable tte a. The decree Of the lower Court s. there
fore ,fined with MI Justice Bradley lytred dis
snug opinion, cOuourtG IN by MrJusIce clifford Ind hr
no 2l7"iho Ge-nania National Bank s.. appellants
bank An appeal Circuit CoIrs Oi The United -;aJ,s
ior the DISTRICT LOu.,ar i rasa sub 70 ENFORCE tho
Tersou, ability OF tho BOcEhnid.ss Of the Crescent city
National extent OF 90 cent OF the value O
the stock by them a. the tW' that bank became u'o
y,nj Court holds mat AtOu sn .h7 termaLt banS
he'd ie crescent CITY nsus merely o. )acra
security OIu became subject 20 SO LA iA.s Of a
kuUlicr and That s 1ttcuuts EVASION of su Inability
OF the stock % lts cfs Wa 10, vas Invalid az
ag4n, me creditors u She solvent corporation Iho
O he lower court is tneroiote ahu Win co-' AID
Interest. Justice strong delyercd tho O.ilOu.
Tho IOuu Ot Lypn.. pdutd in error agt lisar
MunsOn. tOGrt OF the bhiiti states
Distract OF Now Ills va su uppu
bonds bF nae ~ Lyons iu IRymor l1Flti'r'
for b, ia proper authorities s tOur
holds me IN tho d. l.s - a. rOppe i bona bOr
holder bound look fuThef AMI the ObOr cannot
70 hind H. Tia Judgment Of rho lower Court ], sf1nrl
w.n aud intolest. Justco oWAyno delivered tut
No lo4-yohn Klein plliuta IN orror sgt ths Ct, oS
NesOrlrans In trrur 10 tie 'rcS Court OF tie Unlted
STATE. for Di. riot o LuuIaAArho lgmgHt o; tGc
lOw affirmed. The opinion delivered By tAe
CAeiJ astics