National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-11-19

sheele verdict for plaintiff for 5000. washing
ton Market Company VS.. Kuhlan; verdict Tor plain
tiii for one cent damages and costs. Erskino VS..
Carly; verdict for plaintiff for one cent damages
f0S Gyan 70, US BoTa aS Ts bonss
verdict for defendant for 81 900.
CIRCUIT couRr No. 2--JusrfcE Cox.-Huber VS..
Teuber and wife; hearing in progress. u rU
LQufTY CouRr-JusTICE MAcARTHuR.-Black vs
Black; sale ordered and William A. Cook appointed
trustee; Gersdorff VS. Wheeler; $3.50 ordered to be
paid GersdorR from registry OF court Parisen vs.
Pariscn; appearance Of absent defendant ordered.
Ramsey VS.. Daniels; hearing still on. Adjourned
until Tuesday next
CRIMINAL CoURT--JusTcE HAGSER.-John Shea,
carrying concealed weapons; notice of pardon by
the. Commissioners. George +. Nokes keeping
barber;shop open on Sunday. pardoned by the
coimImissioners. Robert o,NeilI unlicensedbag;
bond forfeited. John ]. White, unlicensed bar
guilty. James Cloteworthy, unlicensed bar guilty
motion fora new trial entered. George M. Oyster
4 Co, unlicensed produce dealers. The District
failed to make out a case, and n verdict was re-
turned for the defendants. George X. Dent, pro-
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TOMORROW
SUPREME COURT OF THE DIsTRIcr--CHIEF-JUsTIc
CARTIER AND Jusr1cE JAMEs-No. 81, Howard vs.
Carusi; 0S. Beckett VS.. Jackson 100, Mullins vs..
Harding; 1917, Turner VS.. Oliver; no. McCarty VS..
McCarty: FIJI Hall & Hume VS. Sullivan; ll11{, Dob
bins VS.. Jeukins-of Thomas; 49, Mclaughlin VS..
Woodruff; 49, Mackall VS.. Stewart
CIRCUIT COURT No. 1--JusTIcR wYLIE.-APPEAL
DoCKEr-No. Al, Jordan VS.. Bryan Brother %, Saw
age vs.. kuehling. Regular Calendar-No.7 10. Doe
on demise of Key VS. Gunton; 1923. Murray VS.. Dis
trict fCoumbia 1877, Wclner VS.. Riggs; 2i3 Ruff vs.
Brown; 32l Young VS.. Darling 3il, Wescr
VS.. Carter; 323 Fraas vs.. Singer Manufactur-
Ing Company ct al; 3i5, Angerman VS.. Ger
man American Fire Insurance Company; $40,
Middleton & Co. VS.. Worch; 351, Matthews
| administrative vs. Baldwin ct al; 1853, Love
VS.. McGowan Co., garnlshee 355. Bowles
vs. Walker OF AL 357. Barth Jackson; 1868 United
| States. use Of Dodge and Darneie, VS.. Donaldson
ct al; 36j Ward VS. BlockfUrd ct al; 1857, Corcoran
Art Gallery, trustees Of VS.. Bell ct al; 1859, Casey
Vs. Wiles; 375 Chaplinc VS.. Taylor.
! CIRCUIT COURT No. 2-JusTICE Cox.-APPEAL
| DoCKEr-No. 90 IIoltzman VS.. District OF Column
| ba Regular Calendar-No. 16 armstrong VS.. Will
iams; $50 Daley VS. Trunnell; $40, Childs VS.. Marks
| ct al 22S, Washington Market Company VS.. Hofi-
man; 5S, Huber ct ux. VS.. Teuber ct ux.: 81,
| Teuber ct ux. VS.. Huber et ux.; So Tucker and
| sherman vs. Boston; 150, Clark vs. Schecr and
Pinkard, 176, Archer Pratt; lSS, Reside agent
vs.. Lucas 100 Thwing ct nj. VS.. Dean ct al; 20S,
French VS.. Mcpherson ct al. pa Davis Sons VS..
Smoot;2lS LebbechuN vs. McNall;220, Patterson VS..
Moser 222. District of Columbia VS.. Forsyth; 22G,
Bogue VS.. Cropey; l22, 0Neal vs. District OF Column
ba; $50 Wheeler VS.. Johnson; 232 Northern Liberty
| Market Company vs. Killian; 2l2, Trucsdell, exc
cutor VS. Terry ct al; 2i6, Bridget vs.. Cornish; 2S,
| Hyatt VS.. Tuttle.
| ASSIGNMENTS FOR FRIDAY.
| Equity CouRr-JusTICE MACARTHUR-No 2,
| Ramsey VS. Daniels 10. Noursc VS.. Thornton; 25,
| Smith vs. Smith; g. Rich VS.. Neitzy p. Davis VS..
| Huyck: gS Beckett Beckett. %. Marshall VS.,