National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1879-12-10

plaintiff concluded In regard 10 underpinnlng the
GEORGETOWN mnrket-house, and after the cross-ex-
amnation is finished the work done on the Slash
Run sewer will DO taken up.
CIRCUIT CouRT No. 2-JusTfCR Cox.--Tucker e
sherman VS. Boston; jury TO bring in a sealed yer.
dict Archer vs.. Pratt judgment for defendant
w. Hoffman, verdict for plaintiff for Sl56.4! Win
interest Lewis trustee, vs. the Vestry Of 81. Johns
Church; Judgment set aside OIL stpuation
EQUTTY CoURT--JUsTICE MACARTHUR.-Shields
vs. district OF Columbia: demurrer oyerruled.
Burns w. District of Columbia; demurrer over
ruled. Warren vs. Warren; decree awarding child
to complainant Lew vs.. Thompsoni decree pro
coniesso and appointing commission to select
guardian ad lltem. Strainng VS.. Woodward;
pro confcsso Callahan VS.. Lewis; auditors report
confirmed. Castleman VS.. Frederick; demurrer
sustained, with leave to amend within twenty
days. Kennedy VS.. Kelly ct all appearance OF
j. Stanley Jones ordered Barbour VS. Naylor'
CRIMINAL COURT - UsTTcR HAoNER.- Frank
Etsenger, assault with intent to kill Douglass Glib
son; guilty of assault only; four months In jail;
George Holmes, alias George Brown burglary and
grand larceny not guilty.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TODAY.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UsTicE
CARTIER AND JUSTICE JAMs-No. 1i0, Fifth Bap-
list Church vs.. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Com.
pnny; ZIG, United States VS.. Stokes; 1i7, United
States vs. Perkins, 49, Mccullough VS.. Dennison:
lSl, In re estate John Wagner; 152, Cochran vs..
der VS.. District of Coiumbla i57, National Bank
of Harrisburg W.. Collins 1853. Washington Brick
Machine Company VS.. Griffin.
CIRCUIT COURT No. l--JusTIcE WyLIB.-No. 106.
Wood Il 10. VS.. Grahami.e & Trinidad Asphalt Paw.
ing Company; liz, Adams VS.. District of Columbia.
10 Shehan VS.. Reilly; 209 Spaids VS.. Cooley; W,
Wolf Curtis VS.. Augenstein; DOL Lynch ct TX VS..
District OF Columbia; 81 Makely VS., Cottrell Bros;
35l. Matthews, administrators, vs. Baldwin &C al;
$50 London e Manchester Plate Glass Company,
limited. VS.. Holmes 375, Chapine VS.. Taylor; SOL
Wood Va. Darlington ct all 423, Poikinhornvs. Dyer
ct AL AZ. Parker vs. McChesney; 435, Wall vs. Rob
inson 4ss kennebec Ice Company vs. Inland =
scaboard Cossting Company; All, Herfurth VS.. Cor
poration OF Washington 4i3, Washington w. Clark
AS. Seal Nailor; Az. United States VS.. Mattoo
OF al; 4i0. Lanahan vs. Young ct al; 45l, smith
Wimsatt W.. Long Ct al, garnisbees; 49,, Petit 4
Drip vs. Brown; 45T, Seldner Il Son W.. Bieber ei
| al; i63, Holmes VS.. Kirk; 467, Basshor & Co. vs.
| HILL 1859. Stanton VS.. Wroe-
CIRCUIT COURT No. 2-JusTIcE Cox.-No. 81
Strong VS.. District of Columbia; 208 French W.
MCPHERSON ct al 1888, Reside, agent VS.. Lucas
| ~, O'Ncal ct al. vs. District of Columbia $50
| Wheeler w. Johnson: $40, Childs vs. Marks ct al
4G5. Wagner & Co. VS.. Benedict ct al: 466. CONNER
| Isl, Draper vs. Alexander 1856. Hutchinson VS.
Alexander; $50, Toiten VS.. Rich & Bro; 252, Ross
VS.. Burgess ct al; 2ji, Desmond VS.. Baltimore 4
Potomac Railroad Company 256, Washington Mar
ket Company vs.. Fahey; 25S, Clark VS.. Garges &
Bro; go Shea vs.. Smith; 49, Van Riswick va
| llamlink 2Gi, Shea vs. smith.
EQUrTY CoURr-JUsTIcE MAcARrHUR.-No. 20
| Bates VS.. Hummer; ~. Davis VS.. Huyck; =
Burche vs.. Wallach and Wallach VS.. Burche; %
Baltimore Equitable Society vs. Grant ct all q
Brereton vs. Brcreon; &c. Morris w. Hall; "a
Young VS.. Duvall: % Caster VS.. Langley: 20 Rich
ards VS.. Mackall 29lI. Boteler VS.. Langley
CRIMINAL CoURT-JUsTtCE HAGSER. - JOIN
| Beckett. murder; Jennie Pollard receiving stoler
property; George Holmes, burglary; Zachaiiah Bay
| Tor and Mile Baylor, arson.