The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1878-03-08
peal from the Parish, Court. parish OF Rcd

l
| Injunction is sought 10 restrain n party, frcsa
enforcing. as adminlstrator d s,leneasion n
| Judgment rendered In favor Of suDh snneessioH.
IN the ground that such purity II not only dnali.
fed rs adminisrator.. though the judgment
which he Ia restrained from enforcing. aud the
lpo his possession, were rendered by the Dis
ttiet Court md exceed $500. Nor Is it propeE in
such n case that the injunction be dissolvsh
upon defendants furnishing bond. Judgment
reversed
No, eslo Augustus u. Hickman. rappellant.
rule against ! A. r. Iagr ue and the sheriff =
Appsn from the Fourth District Court parish,
Where Tho interest If mn heir ia. asueeession
Is Heispd under execution. the right aud inter
eat Of The heir In The entirstvof the succession.
subject to its ettlement and tn the payment pt
i's debts. must be Appraised end sold not his
spsoing Interest In specific pieces OF property
belonging 10 IT,
No. este. yhe sta'e Of Lnnlsana vs. y. "
Snow, appellant Appeal from the District
Cour', parish Of Duaehita. ,,...,
prosecution for utterlng forged document
Is prescribed by one year, Where an inutet-
,nsnt contains two oe,4ns, but one n whloh 10
good. Is general verdict Of guilty will be main
ialnad ms to the good count.
Judgment amended 50 as 10 nalnsain plea Of
presentation Ms tg the second count, s.
NO es91. A. y, ansmans appellant, ,vs. Susan
Berryinnn and husband 1T Hl-hppaal from the
Disttc Cow" Parish q ast t' I. h No.
nation in act 1T sale Of so many lots in such q
square is not sufficient description.
Judgment a tuad.
No 6a44 state Of Louisiana VS.. John g.. Hrls-
| coe appallsnt.--A ppeal from The District Court.
parish Of Fast F.lloinna
| Judgment affirmed,
Barrow & al. vs.. Ghaliss T.. Fisher, treasurer
"fsh N wsa sg t'S the District court
| No affidavit Of interest Ia necessary TO sustain
nm appeal BY the Police Jory, from d Judgment
treasury is not good ground for the Treast-
ret g refusal to tagistelh claim against the par
| ish under section 2t4s II. s.
| Motion 10 hisniss appeal refused. ard judg-
| ment amended so as to dlsallnw REALTORS claim
for The raeI.rY Of The items for serving ngtoss
Theogene .caiilopet Appeal from the District
| Court parish Of Iafonrebe.
reis"sd with ssrv" Of thsr right 10 Sue
| for cash advances made by them.
ny JUSTICE SPENCER,
| No. saps. Howard Mcknight, appellant. VS.,
| parish of Grant.-Appeal from the District
| COURT. parish Of Grant.
Though land d. dieated to public uses cannot
| be sold under execution peHnst The parish to
which 1t belongs. ths buildings erected thereon
are subjeetto The mechanics lien and can be sold
| under judgment Tor the costs Ut their erection.
Judgment amended 50 rs TO recognizes lien on
| buildings.
No go D. r George t spREG I, vt, r. \
|
parish Of Tanginahqa. Judgment reversed
No. 7oo,. Mrs. Euphtosine .nlaks OF a.. appel
| len's. vs.. the minors Frank KeaInsy ana Anna
10. Lake Appeal from tho Parish Court parish
| OF Ibstville.
70 Terminate tho existence Of u succession
| The heirs must all be sui iu,is with capacity to
render themselves Internationally liable Tor
| the succession debts Tbetefgre no extra jndi-
oiaI acts Of o miner can legally terminate ihe
Judgment reversed a1s't and eaee retnauded,
No. b4ss M aoepper II Son VIZ. Caspar Lusse,
appellant. Appeal from the Sixth District
| Judgment affirmed, with 10 per cent damages.
| No Gbit State Of Louisiana vs. Judge Spencer.
appellant. Appeal from The District Court. pas-
| ish pt TeusHs.
| Judgment affirmed.
No. G9oa, The state OF Louisiana vs, Peter
| Thompson appellant Appeal from the Dis
| tritt Court parish Of I,afourchs.
| Judgment affirmed.
No. s,a oah T,onoh ys ThGm qs ,h snd
| triet Court parish Of Madison.
| Judgment reversed.
No, epbs Alfred s, Bass appellant. vs, VIM. i.
! tsryenors Appeal from the District court
parish Of Avoyeles.
with it hat Of alienation of the capital Of firm
must be given in writing, either in the articles
Of .pnrtnsrship or otherwise
No 69s4. Mrs NJ. A. Thoms. administrative
etc appellant, VS. Il w. Sewell ct ns.-Appea
from the District Court. parish Of East Helioi-
HHAs yuIRUAHt TFNbisHbi
NO 1O54 sucessaion Of W. u. Gayle. On
opposition Of WIN sa1hler. appellant to npa
account Appeal from the Parish Court parish
| Of East FelicianH,
Tho reinseripiion 81 n sherffs bond in The
mortgage office Within ten years from the
| original registry. Is necessary to preserve the
legal mortgage rssnl ting thersffom.
| Judgment affirmed.
No 7oOs. j. Mat, Wells. Jr.. executor. etc, MP
| peinnt VS.. Fannie NJ md Ida Wells.-appsa
from The District Court. parish oil IApidss
| Judgment affirmed.
The Chief Justice took no part In this de-
eisipn.
No cots. J. N. Brown. administrator. VS.. Eliza
beth A. II, Brown. appellant Appeal from ths
i District Court. parish Of Red River.
Tho delivery OF mmpvhbes is always con
stdersd AS accompanying the pnbHe na b.
Il which they hre transferred, whether that net b.
u EnIe or dafion m Dniemeut Where ~ con.
trnet Is attacked on the ground that the OK.
| pressed consideration does not exist. Or that
there was no consideration for It. the party mat
show other consideration than that expressed
In the contract.
Judgment reversed.