The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-04-24


sumo the magnitude Of a debatabls subject II Is as
dead as The democratic party"
JoHs HANNA, rep; OF Ind :-"It Is all damned
oosh- II Is only an effort Of somebody 10 keep him
soil before the public lie should DO characterized a.
disturber OF the pubic peace"
AUGUSTUS A. HARbExnsRom, (dem.) Of N. j., had
voted Tor the Electoral Commission bill and is bound
oy tho action OF Congress In declaring Mr. Hayes
elected Ho would do nothing revolutionary
ALFRED u HARMER, trep.) Of Pa, opposed two
have entirely too many disturbing questions bother
us without nventing another TO add to our measure
Of national lroubles.n
BENJAMIN W. HARRIS. trep.l Of Mass, opposed:-
'Since you want an opinion why not have the subject
referred to the Naval Committee? That Is excellent
on patchwork"
HENRY r. HARRIS, dem, OF Ca, oppossd:--sI
would DO bad policy financially, politically socially
and nationally 10 revive tho issue in any FORM"
CARTER II. HARRISON, (dem.) OF H., opposed
There viii not be found corporai's guard TO defend
H. The bill has sothing meritorious about s to
mend II 10 our HOMAGE
T. KIKKE HART. (dcm.) OF N Y, Is opposed 10 IT,
"rhere will 90 nothing but i'll will gained,
soo II the question Is ever brought before the House.
JULIAN HARrRIDGy, tdem.) OF Ga, opposed As
member Of t9e judiciary Committee It would not DO
proper for me TO express opinion but my judgment
WILLIAM HARTzELL. (dem.D OF ILL.,, opposed :--.swny
should the question DO rcopenedY what good can DO
accomplished or what will DO tho utility OF such
measure AZ this timer No. Let II be forgotten for
the good OF all concerned"
DUDLEY G HASKELL, (rep.) OF Kan, opposed :-.I do
not honestly believe tho movement has enough
strength In tho House To demand tho yeas and nays"
ROBERT A. HATCHER, tdcni.) OF So. opposed :--"I
am empna'icaliy opposed TO any revival OF tho dead
est issue that we have had before us Tor years."
PHILIP c. HAYES, (rep) OF ILL.,. opposed - although
have not Endorsed tho Presidents policy entirely in
regard to the SOUTH still opposed to an ytniug Of
this kind In TOTO"
GEORGE C. HAzELroS. (ren) OF Wiz, opposed :-'The
disposition both sides House is to treat is
with the contempt II so properly deserves. II will
never reach vote in the House,
GEORGE W. HENDEE, (rep) Of W.. opposed 1.-THE
Dill has no show In the House and there nothing 20
Indicate that It viii BIO brought to our attention"
THOMAS ;. HENDERSON. trcp) Of ILL.,, says:--'Oe
course am opposedso disturbng she question: and
tAak she dsmscrats aush, b ronteps with The r.
I suit Of tho Electoral Commission schcms.n
ELI J. HsSKLE. tdcm.) OF Nd, opposed :-''Thsro 10
more probability OF the bill passing than that rain
will fall In torrents from q clear sKy.n
HILARY A HERBERT, tdenAl Of Ala, opposed SIT Ia
evident that tho agitation OF this question comes from
republican sources and surely no democrat. win on.
courage Thorn In disturbing tho peace OF tho country
or and Thorn In imperilhng our future prospects"
ARRAM s. HEWITT, (dem.) OF n. r., has mot fully
acquainted himself with tho details Of the BILL but
thinks he discerns signs Of weakness In the meas
urc, for instance, tho Court may decide that no
hos grievance, and then what will our logisla-
tion profit tho friends OF either partyf He Is op-
posed TO tho agitation, because no does SEQ that
can pro6t any ono
GOLDSMITH W. HEwrrr, (dom.) Of AIN, opposed: -
"rhers IL not . member Of the Alabama delegation
that favors the rsopening OF tho question"
FRANK HIscocK, (rep) OF r., opposed :--.Aiost
cmpha.ica!ly am l opposed to the revivai OF such
q political issue. Do you know Of any republican
who Is notf"
JoHs r. House., (dcm.) Of Tenn, says:--sI am not
only opposed she bill, put shnk Il the mos. idoto
that could be Invented. It ought 10 be good
evidence against tho originator Of the bill that no 10
compos mentis."
JAY A HUnpELI, trep.) OF Mich.. opposed :-.'Not
that iovo Hayes less, but because love peace moro,
am opposed 10 tho revival OF tho subject In any
snapa'
H. !. HUMPHREY, trep Of Wis.,, opposed :-sIt viii
| mover ccme before tho House, much less become q
judicial question for the attention Of the Supreme
| Court" sN
| Jons N. HuxaERroRD. (rep) or N. T., oppossd:-
involve II instability, and have . tendency q
| Mexicanizo our government wo do NOT want oul
prosperity n,crfcred with by any such issuos.v
MoRroS G. HUNTER, frer.) Of Ind, opposed:-.T am
opposed to everything OF the kind There 10 no via
dom In u and cannot think our friends viii encour.
| age IT,"
ANTHONY IrrSER, (dsm.) Of NO., opposed. -"wish
The country peace lot tho matter rcst. DO not o.
tempt 10 gaivnnize q corpsc.n
AxAzfAn b. JANIS, trep.l Of N r., opposed 1.-THE
democrats do certainly the subject revived
and OF course, the republicans will not listen TO such
q proposition"
FRANK JONES, tdom.) OF N. H., opposed:--'Nothins
will DO done with Il this session. aud tho sooner s
removed from political consideration tho bocr Il viii
DO the peace OF tho country and good OF the
democratic party"
J. 7. JONES. tdcm) OF Ala, opposed cit 10 highly
improbable that any thing will DO done. Tho Southern
men against IT,"
JONI JONES. (repJ OF Ohio. opposed:-"lt 10 a wild
proposition calculated TO mako mischief and has not
single element OF good In IL Let 10 do q natural
| doath."
Josnrn JonGRssEs, (rep.) Of Va, opposed SIT IA
doad issue for tho present. and the only way 10 got.
Ito II is at tho next Presidential cicciion.p
CHARLES H. JorcE, (rcpI Of W, opposed :--"rhcro
Is not tho possibility OF ITS being rcsurrcctcd. Any
attempt WouI1 DO nOotcd down almost unanimously
by the democrats as by tho republicans"
J. wARsEy KEIrER, trep) OF ohio:-"who do not
think tho Electoral law Is u,iona now that the
Presidential question Is settled am opposed TO re-
wing H. II quo warranto proceedings arc proper
think there Is already Sufficient legislation on tho
subject authorize them without additional lcgisa.
tiop.'
EDWIN w. KMcurLrr, frepD or Mich, "wiil vote 10
kin Il on sight, lie will also vote against any u.
tempt In any form 10 reopen tho question"
WILLIAM o.. KELLEY. trop) OF Pa, opposed -
swhy, what foolish question. Why NOS attempt 10
predict what the weather win be on ths 7n or Janu.
AIRY nex,r'
Jous II. KErcn,n, frcp.D OF N. Y.:--"I nm opposed
10 the rcsolusons, and l do not think you can nnd
any that are looiish enough 10 favor thcm.n
JcnS W. KfLISGEa, rcp) Of Pa, opposed :--"Lct
10 sleep tho sleep OF death that knows no waking.
That is what wc say and how wc will vote"
GEoRoE II. LAsDgns, tdcm.) OF Conn, opposed -
sstv Itk No