Gold Hill daily news. [volume] (Gold Hill, N.T. [Nev.]) 1863-1882, 1878-06-13
TELE
Proceedings Of the Com
mittee on Revolution.
Continuation Of Judge OAR
rails Testimony.
THE PLATFORM OF THE OHIO RE.
PUBLlCANS.
The. Revolution In Our Neighbor
Republic.
PREslDENr HAYEs AT WEST
lSPsoiAL DarArcHrs TO THE Com HILL
DAILY Nrws.l
PREsIDENr HAYES AT WEST
POINT.
lsrsoiAL DsrArcnrs TO THE ooLD HILL
DAILY Nxws.l
ProceedisEs OF tho commitsee on
Revolution.


Proceedings or tho Committee on
Revelation.
WAsuINaroS, June l2.--In the Potter
conmi,,.. mi. .uor,oo, D,rrall wa,
oo ~" A - =
cross-eIamined by denerai bhtier' WIZ
asked witness II he had intended to gel
into ofice through ,be fear of the Admin.
,.,,,,,on ,h,, ,ho doc,men, IN nosse,.iou
OF perlurer' ioaier anu o'AoAni"'ie' "o"''
be publishedp
yyi,,sss re,Iiod that bo had mot called
-
ANDERSON nat
Butler said (: " Well. 10 now call MIN
that, tor reasons" and demanded All N
.w.r
"i'hess 'cPiieu u.s.
Question-Wore you not surprised thA'
m .bls a LAWYER. 40 honorable q statesman
| ,nd A limited States Senator, would EN-.
| nloy such 4 messenger as Andcrson2
riT cannot saw that I was surprised,
Witness s.id shortly after the Potter
| committee was appointed Anderson wrote
| him ,h,t he intended 10 testify before II,
anI wi,nsss toId him "a do 40. lie Thought
lna.,son nal moi been treated right. liz
s.iJ .o,netbiny M Ills kind 500 ahead.
pi,a,, into and exno.e tho psaIm.sipgin
h.~n.r,...' - ,hst Ills naners Womb do N.
H. -ss not : very warm feeling toward
~ i,n,nis,,.,;on In bis State. Witness
s III .i.i,aS ,ha Socre,,rv ri state with
asu a. r., him an an,ointment Tbo
oi"Nss. :, Co. 49, H ,i,sv conid get
Deeieta'y '. ~, ar n.na.r.,i.
tnc hs1N S.. " y"
mempers oi .neii nu .,.u,,,., a.. ~
witness was v,osoty AAan.. ,ns,s,so
whetner NO soi',,'su aehio mhn,h.v
psesnn aJ.snI i, VIM. s,.,sJ 1,
anderson ,cnueI.u '. "isn. .anS
W. III uei'e' ~ ~. H. ~. ..nJ,js,n,o
son 70 eone anu heiP m"n"s. a.,
Su,n s nau yn nnau,nan. .,bi.L woni,i
mnsa M $50" ,hst ho An 10 "a Ina
Innhuue5n'o w. ,ho ,%i.i,,nc statesmen
-nnatn ~ 0r,s.ns In inpi, Anderson
.havaJ -;,rs.s = letter from Mathew In.
,rn1r.in. him IN .JuJyo Harlan. anil said
Wv ha. u.,Isn lie o%ricinaI Weller
asraomsnf .t,er beiny nromiscJ by Harlan
so,ns no.i,ion, Th.t was witness's recol.
$780, wi,n.s. o,nre..ed mnob sur.
lecuon. W,'ness c.P,es ~. ao.nu .n,
PIiso .h.s .,. A., ~, a., IJ.risn or
anu hhuerson sa'u ~ onos 'Ia as.N1 ~ ~
MATTHEW'S woulu seeuro nrm ~ JIM.
eAve w .ho sg,eenhen. 1919
surprise That Harlan and Matlhews wouiI !,
get anderson an ollco WIN Iu.y III 49,
the iranlnieh. aBrecnen. Mni' !. ~"
made. witness nrst iea.ne1 49,
istence OF tho sherman le''er iIonh nhueI'
son. who said u was gwen ny chermah 70
~stoughton ior himseIi anu WIZ H., h.,
spouse TO thcir iet,er s'a'ins WY ~. ~
made returns from their parishes ,hA. WI
sherman letter said u they s,Ana
firm by the liepublican parry anu no tneir
duty they would DO rewarusu ~ ~, ~. na,
m=ln,stA.on. nna,S no., ~, ,ha d.to
ter important but could no, u. tne as,o
OF II. but II Was prior 70 January ne
intended to use these ietters IN possession
Of Anderson to secure the Coliectorsnlp;
and beloved he failed TO get or 70 eohtroi
the appointment because u WAS known
that other copies OF the were
extant.
Butler laid stress on DArrali being VIII
ing 10 accept office procured by q ioaier,
blackmailer and perjurer by means OF iAiso
documents.
Darrall admitted that he nal snpstan-
TALLY so stated. md. moreover, sa,u no
regretted That no ia,ied. nc .nousn' va" -.
Matlhsws kne" Anue''o"
himself did. v..,,u-
hegnrulng hlS In.e',.'r Nv in.,.n.s
Da,f.,i say ne N." ,hI,a ,h., r.sssd L.
u WA. .ho h,s' 'n,ns .u .,,,aws
tween them was ms sla'.insn' 70 " ~
that inc New ,ois '"n m.uH vopi ~
document, ~ 'no orIsIhA, y. ~,
iored 70 .ho iIIuon peup,ui s,o.. nann.
no nau 'no sAho nso ta w.s eon.
crauc souIocs, wv, " iM 80 80 Jono
ceineu, no u,a nv' ~ IA ,h., bs ala
WIN tno ~ uhn.n io,,ar w.. In on.
no' ps''''' ~
" M.s ., Aha .rc.osdi,y evidenoe vas an
.,.hus.,,on 81 that given Inv Dsrrsll yes.
$3.50 mi x.. made spicy by the sharp
observation-disclosures Of Butler. Ho stated
tbst rben he tirst saw the papers held by
Andersop. no was alone In tho room with
Mr.. smith. present Collector OF New Or
ie.ns. and smith expressed surprise that
.nch napers existed, Matthews told wit
meas t6nt Inc had met Anderson some timo
400 and thst Anderson disgusted him by
sSesLinc harshly, and that he had told An.
dsrson tbat he would have nothing moro
~ 10 viii him. He had done everything
nos.ibIe' and Anderson might publish tho
rsners tbat no was unreasonable. etc.
rMcN,bon examined VIM. II. Seymour.
notary nnblic of New Orleans. who
identified his seal and signature 10
tho Webor.Anderson papers. lie knew
Anderson, but not Weber. Ander.
sop introduced him to . gentleman
A. being Mr.. Weber. n the two sw0re 10
tbe document. He did not know the con.
tents Of the document, and merely received
s~ssursnces from them that u would not be
unprofessional or ridiculous for him TO
AZ his seal 10 II. He was sure no called
attention TO the fact that wober's had not
been written, and insisted that II be In.
serted. which was then done in his pres.
enco in the body Of tho jurat. lie was
ciosely examined as 10 tho ink and pen
useJ anil be WAS unwilling 10 swear, alter
reelection. that weber's namo was written
in his Office At tho time.
II. A. wider OF seN oI.eans III. ~
tns. na h,n, .nI 400 n thew couli col Inc
Son.man. .-r,norIeJged by a notary with.
uU, ~" no.sry knowing ia contents. lie
md Dich Witnessed Tie document 1t An.
dsr.on', reouest. He thought Anderson
and Weber signcd tho paper In his own
oa,es. moi In Tho not.ry's. Weber, tho
Srother Of one Alleged sinners, was known
10 witness, and was . totally different look.