The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1878-03-19
Decisions.


No 6393. Christian Boye VS.. Thomas Miles,
Rehearing granted.
No. 1894. Thomas Miles vs.. Christian Boye.-
No GAO. Salter & Co. vs.. Leonardo Marino.-
No. e5ls' Amelia Smith VS.. Thos. J. Kinny, ex-
misunderstanding refused.
No. 6sl2. The State of Louisiana VS.. Alonzo
Brooks and John Brooks, Sr.-Rehearing re-
No. 1904. Mrs. Mary Sexton vs.. NJ. Osullivan
No 5l2o. J. P. Garvey vs.; Price, Hine. & Tup-
same sam Morton, Bliss i Co., iateryenors Re
hearings refused.
No; $751;. Etienne Couleau vs.. Warren, Akin
son Il Collaborating refused.
No: els. TIE State of Louisiana vs.. Henry
Smith, appelant-Ap from the Second Ju-
dicial District Court, parish Of Orleans.
! common law of England at or before the adop.
ton of the act of our gisla OF 1906, and could
not therefore haye been punishable here ere under 7
criminal law of England as it then existed:
But that act merely adopted the definitions Of
procedure for criminal prosecutions under the
law of ENGLAND, There being thus common
law definition Of the crime adopted in our State,
constitute the ottense. no Indictment can be
| found.
| No. $3.50. Succession of James w. Pipes On
| rule of A. Miltenb3rger against administrators,
appellant. from the Parish Court, par
| ish of 1berville.
| Where an administrators appeals from a
| judgment against her as such and gives bond
accordingly. the appeal will not be dismissed
| because the clerk enormously enters the order
of appeal in her individual capacity.
| Motion to dismiss denied and Judgment al
No. $780, Mrs. E. W. Mitchell. appellant. vs..
Mrs. Eliza A. Eagan.-Appeal from the District
Court. parish Of Tangipahoa.
| Judgment affirmed.
and Mrs. Samuel Fiske, appellants. Appeal
from the Second District Court. parish of Or
The sister Of a person adjudged interdict
for insanity has. by, virtue of such relation
ship. an interest in the Judgment sufficient to
can be taken even after the death of the inter
dict. Motion e dismiss refused
& upper 9l and John B. LATTE 4 Co. appellants,
Morton, Bliss & Co., .intervenors and appel
lants.;-Appeal from the Sixth District Court,
In this case the court reaffirms the decision
in Chaffraix Agar vs. Price, Hine d Upper,
~ J nd me reversed.
No. 7o72. State of Louisiana VS.. Thos. G. An
derson. appellant from the Superior
CRIMINAL Court parish IRIS OF Orleans no+o
Judgment reversed and prisoner discharged.
BY JUSTICE MARI.
No. 5421. Chaffraix & Agar vs. John B. Lafltte
fri St Court, parish Of Orleans. n '-' '''A' s
In this case the facts are the same as those
presented in % An. 176, the decision in which
| case is reaff1rmed
| Judgment reversed.
justices Egan and Spencer delivered dissent
| ing opinions.
No 6873. II. W. Hamlin ct al. vs.. the Board OF
Liquidation, appellant Isidore Newman. in
| tervenor. Appeal from the Fifth District Court
parish of Orleans.
The bonds held by plaintiffs and issued to the
Baton Rouge, Crosse Tete and Opelousas Rail;
that held by intervenor, issued for the relief OF
the State Treasurer. under the act approved
April 80, 1858 having been issued in strict con-
are entitled to have the same funded.
Judgment amended SO as to order costs Of
suit to be paid by the State.
| loving to the lateness of the hour to which
the reading of opinions was protracted. we are
unable to give the syllabus of all the cases de-
cided this morning. but will conclude them to
mOrrOW.l