National Republican., 1878-01-15
The su, rem. Court of the United states.


MONDAY, January II, 1873
On motion Of Mr.. Assistant Attorney General
Smith, Benjamin =. Grafton, esq, Of Jefferson
Texas, and John II. Doyle. eEq., Of Toledo, Ohio,
were admitted to practice.
on motion Of Mr.. P. Phillips, F. D. Benton, ESQ.,.
Of Saratoga y. Y, and william W. Billson, esq, Of
st. Paul, MINI, were admitted to practice.
On motion Of MIR. :. Shellahnrgof, Joseph Warren
Keifer, esq. Of Springfield, Ohio, was admitted TO
practice.
esq, of Charleston, $. c. was admitted TO practice.
On motion of Mr.. X. T. Mcrrick. James q. Field,
cs5 Of RiChm9nd Va was sdmitsd 70 practice
Jsnesylle, wis, was admitted to practice.
No. lhs Pedro Chaboya ct al, plaintiffs in error,
VS.. David Umbargcr ct al. In error to supreme
Court Of California. Judgment affirmed, with costs
Opinion by Mr.. Justice Miller. No. lIS George W.
Dial ct al, appellants Robert b. Reynolds ct al.
Appeal frOm the Circuit Court Of the United States
for Eastern district Of Tennessee Decree affirmed,
with costs. Opinion by Mr.. Justice swayne. No.
a. william n; Fsrrngt9n plaintiff a. IN Grror II Tvs vs..
comb plaintiff In error, vs.. The state of Tennessee
e al. No eis, NJ }. wiSks plaintiff in Srr9rvs The
tf In error, vs. The state Of Tennessee ct nj. No.
66l, Napoleon Hill, plaintiff In error, vs.. The
state Of Tennessee ct al; In error 10 the supreme
Court OF Tennessee. Decree reversed, with costs,
and causes rcmandcd. with directions To enter de-
crccs in favor of the plaintiffs in opinion by
Mr.. Justice Clifford, and Mr. Justice Field.
No. II. Eliza Jane Hall, administrator, &c,
plaintiff in error. vs.. Josephine Decnir In err
TO the supreme Court Of Louisiana. Judgmcnt re.
Nered, with costs Cause remandcd. with instriic.
tons to reverse tile judgment Of the District Court
and for such further procc 'dings in conformity
with the opinion of THIS court may appear to be
sSssy sesrsiey yop4S" Jastcs sSf c5rd '' waite
Alfred and Edwin, &c. Appeal from the Circuit
Court Of the United states for the Eastern District
Of New York. Decree affirmed with costs. Deci-
No. Csc. The Baltimore and ohio Railroad Com.
pany plaintiff In error, w. The state of Maryland.
Motion 20 advance denied. Decision announced
No i9, David l.. lulee, plaintiff in error vs. Fran
Gis Nnse; motion to dismiss submitted by Mr. =;
| Phillips and Mr.. u. W. StOughtOn In support OF
same and by Mr.. r. y. Dickcrson in opposition.
No Si2 James r. Wood q al. plaintiffs In error,
submitted Is Mr. John < Wills E in sTppSTt Of same
aud BY Mr.; William Bskewcll in nr(6siton. No.
~, United states, appellants. " L. +. Norton, as
sigmee. &c; No 523, United states, appellants, " F..
T. Norton, assignee Sc: No. 52i. Umited States ap.
lellRnts, vs. James 4. White ct al; No i2t, United
state gplellnmts, y: J. A. B9nHuion; No. 80
&c; No 81 United Srcs, appellants, ". Jonas H.
lsvy.et al; No. 52s, United States appellants, vs.,
| pcllRntS, VS.. Edward \. lurke submitted on
printed arguments by Mr.. Assistant Attorney.
;isneral smith for appellants and by Mr..
t%tSd s,d,Ss s .aomitsd S Mr Fnom@. y Gumni %
aa a Mr. G M sn T SE MT der
twerlieth rule. No sOi. The United States. appel.
liant vs. Cyrus G. Clark submitted by Mr. Assistant
Attorncy.ucnefnl Smith for appellant, and by Mr..
/ Thomas II. Talbot for appellee, under twentieth
rule. No. ~. James NJ. Piper c, al appellants vs.
for appellants, aud by Mr.. Assistant Attorney Gen.
crai smith for appellee, under twentieth rule; No
~. The United states appellsnt vs. Henry E. Nc
GSci f 81 Sass lies @ sSbn.iei E' by ST. Is!an, ' AdT
ney General smith for the United stgtes, and By
Mr.. :. ". johnson for Mckee. under twentieth rule
SnmInl hufFPhtll anIsallAnt ~
The United States. Submitted by Mr.. Harvey
spading for appellant, and by Mr. Assistant Attor.
ncy General smith for the appellee, under the
No. 1854. The United States, appellants VS. John
T. Morrison: Submitted by Mr. Assistant Attorney
General Smith for appellant and by Messrs. Paine
4 Grafton for the appellee under the twentieth
No 793 The United States appellant vs. An.
drew NJ. Moore, Submitted by Mr.. Assistant Attor-
ney General Smith for appellants. and by Messrs.
sanborn, and King for the appellee under the
No Il3. The United States appellant VI, Charles
Buuigny ct al. submitted by Mr.. solicitor Generl
anm r iIt e Ts I JcT Sn tbc Hy M Ts
No. J5. The United States. appellant, vs.. Sebas-
tlan kaufman. Submitted by Mr. solicitor Gcnelal
Phillips for appellant and by Mr.. 7. Y. Dye for the
appellee, under the twentieth rule.
The United Statcs Submitted by Nr. j. b san.
born ior appellant Gni by Mr. Solicitor General
Phillips for the appellee under the twentieth rule.
No. $9l: Andrew M"Mrkem, appellant vs.. The
! nlltl ElhleN. SuDiElittu ny MF. W lllCs Drum
momd and K. II. bradford, appellant, and by MIR.
S0licitOr-General Phillips for appellee under iwen.
ticth rule No. 66S The United States appellant
vs. Heir of John Watkins. Submitted by Mr..
SOlicit0r-Gencml Phillips for appellant and by
Mr.. Wiile' DluCmond and Mr. H. II. Bradford for
appcllces, under twentieth rule. No. 0l7. Thomas
B keogh, appellant VS. The Orient Fire lnsuran &C
Company ct. al. Submitted by Mr. EnGch Tottcn
for appellant and by Mr.. SIR. Bond for Appellces
under twentieth rule. No. SO Morris kctChum
ct al apTaIlant vs. William Butler duncan ctal
and No. 1857. Rudolph Merriam ct al, appellant
VI. Wilson lscn at The molten to advance these
causss and the motion TO order suspendng opera,
ton Of superiedeGs. Argued by Mr.. Z. LAndrews in
support OF motion.
Adjourned until to-day at Ii o'clock.