The New York herald., 1878-03-12
eyan.er elam h.rs.oiore iurnIshoa Motlon 70 .hs |.

countor claim hsrstofore furnished. Motion 10 thai
prentlss va Nicholas. The plaintiff is an officer OF
the Court aud sues oy virtue OF an order oil the Court
the unds OF the corporation OF which the planlif s
the receiver On what ground then tins motion
be sustainedf Notion denied. with $40 costs.
Paterson VS. Burke.--Motion to vacate order Of ar
rest Is denied, with costs. Tho amount OF the bail 10
reduced 10 81, 500.
Society for Reformation OF Juvenile Delinquouts vs.
BecKer.-This case Is apparently within the meaning
OF the statute ana therefore the injunction hereto
granted should DO continued $40 costs, OF
motion to abide event
Honger VS.. Duryee. This action Is upon tho COW
enants the luasc, and can. IN my opinion. be trod
In an hour Motion granted aud case set down Tor
He,sman W. Abraham.-Moton TO vacatc the order
OF arrest Is granted The defendant positively
that he has refused 10 marry the plaintiff that no
is about 10 b. married TO another, ana on tho whole
would be unjust aud oppressive (Liddoil va Palmer,
Z Hun, 1867
Court prenanda or briefs. From such examination OF
the testimony us have been able 10 mako am OF the
opln,on that tho witness should answer The questions
which objected TO-
Ruser VS.. Griinn.--li the defendant questions tho
suficiency OF the plaintiffs suretiss he may have
order the surety again justify within nvo days;
otherwise the Justification Will stand NO costs See
memorandum
Brown VS.. Townsend Savings Bank-Uness the
Sherin's counsel furnish mo with some authority Tor
the amendment which they propose TO the ordcr sub
motion may stand until Wednesday, the 18th, Tor
that purpose Any authorities submitted on behalf Of
Sheriff be upon The attorneys tor The
parties 10 the action.
IN The matter OIL the Clairmont Savings Bank (two
cases-The petitioner should bring his action, the
question arising the cease cannot be tried Or dis
posed of on motion The motions are therefore de-
MED, but without costs.
Hagravo vs. Bohmer-All tho material allegations
In the affidavit stated on Information aud belief,
and no attempt is made 10 show tho sources o. ne ~.
formation or the grounds OF tho Oelie lhe aihdnvib
Is therefore entirely insnicien anu the order applied
Tor must be refused,
Porrlr VS. hontant; Perry vs.. Chapmani Cara vs..
Chapman.-Granted
Dolan VS.. Curry.-Order granted.
In the matter oi Recse-Noticc should be given o.
this proceeding TO ui persons who are Interested IN
the trial. The Court oannot appoint referee IN an
ex-partc proceeding.
SUPREME COURT -cIRcuIr-PART !.
BY Judge Van Worst
Liienthal vs. Ocean Natioua Bank and others. =
Case ana amendments settled
SUPREME CoULT-sPEcIAL TERM,
BY Judge Van Worst
Fowler vs.. Mehrbach.--MoLions denied Nemor-
Philips VS. Lindsay ct aL--Decree signed.
Dejonge VS.. Peyser Of al.-Findrgs settled and
signed.
cree signed.
Vernam va. Partridge and others.-As to tho defend
ant John Partridge tho complaint is dismissed, with
costs; as 10 Inc defsnuant, Lockwood, his mortgage
must be declared to be lien Tor 81 500 and interest
BY Judge Van BrunL
Excelsior Grain Binder Company VS.. StayneC-See
opiniDn.
Robinson va. BrsDanc.-rhe Geueral Term seem,
upon appeal from the order allowing the illpg 0f
supplemental complaint, TO have passed upon the
very questions passed upon by this demurrer De-
murrer overruled, with leave ~ answer ON pay mont
OF costs.
Rhineander &C., VS.. Hope-The covenant con-
tanei IN The lease montoped IN tho answer is that
the plaintiff shall pay the Of all and brick
buildings erected the premises bv the lessee his
assignee The answer simply alleges thai at tho OK
piration OF tho there was and st ~ upon
preses certain stone or brick building OF the value
OF $4,000 for which The plaintiff has not paid. There
tnaa fhnff hntlA
erected by the lessee or his assgneos. without which
alegalio1An no cause OF action Is SHOWN. Demurrer
with leave to amend ON payment Of COSTS
Banks vE Lombardo et a.-Afhdavlt Of regularity
does not state whether or not there are infants OF ab
sentees.
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge freedman.
Wright va. Equitable Late Assurance Society Mo-
ton denied, but without costs. SEQ memorandum.
Spiess VS. Damm-No opposing aihdgvts have
beeu read; the motion is granted.
Sullivan Vs. Suilivan.-Judgment for plaintiff upon
the demurrers with leave 10 defendant to answer
Mclaughlin Va STANDARDIZATION denied, without
costs.
Maxwell ct al. VS.. German-American Bank.-Mo.,On
White vs. Roberts-Order denying motion.
McShane ct al va Clan Ranold-Ordcr appointing
Sutherland q. lay l0r receivvr, &c
Airsch Va. Goldman; Bauer vs. Goldman; Spngam
VI. Goldman; Barnett OF al Va Goidman-Order tor
Freedman ct al Va TempIer ct al Payne ct al Va.
Hincks ct ai--Orders OF discontinusnce.
rooker vs. Losw-Ordered on special calendar for
OppenneirAer va. observation-disclosures ordered.
,Oppenheimor vs.. Oppenhcime. Ordered 70 pro-
duce certain proofs before referee, &c.
spess W. Daupn.-Order granting motion.
White vs. RoLert; Westerinan vs.. Remington, JI /;
Long vs. Basseu; Black ". Van Horn; saason ys:
vs. Aemmer; Manning w. Rowland; McDonouyh VA
Marunc-Orders granted
BY Judge SANFORD.
Jeremiah va Hymas-Order settled.
COMMON PLEAs-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Robinson.
schirmer Va Brandt-i require copy Of tho stem
ographer's notes.
Lang VS.. CostelIo.-Molion for injunction and ap-
pointment OF receiver granted, with $40 costs.
AcAiiister VI. Jex:-FindinRs sestlod and signed
BY Judge Llrr0more.
Lachenmoyer vs.. Bernam; Sanders vs.. Gillett; in
tho matter SC, of Goodkind granted.
In the mattor Of Stormsi Day Vs. shsrman.-Bond
approved ,,.., - 49,
and judgment ordered.
In The matter OF Potter, Gc-Docroo entered dis
charging assignee and releasing surety on bond.
by Judge Van Hoesen.
Manning Vs. Mannip&- Issues sottlod.
Ripley vs. Gwynnc.-Complaint dismissed.
MARINE CouRT-spECIAL TERM AND CHAMBERS.
BY Judge McAdam.
McEwen We Naturalization Tor judgment granted.
Won Keller VS.. Pnelan Ash Va Thaiman.-sse In.
dorsement on papers HE'D
Averill vs.. The Ph9nix Iron Company.
ment allowed on terms
Decker VS.. hiicr.-Motion granted. without costs.
Jones VS.. neutrality-suspicious. 10 punish tor contompt
deniei and examination ordered TO proceed
Kahn vs.. Spe,daL-Motion denied No costs.
Francis vs.. Schenen; Auliner VS.. Koch.-Motion
granted.
Gsauiot va. Mason: Ebert Vs. Maekin Compliant
dismissed.
Franklin Insurance Company Va Gilmore.--Amend-
ment allowed.
Greacen VS.. Katski; whcatcraft vs. sackron.-D
faults
Nayor vs. Lcnt; Gouldng VS.. Lochman; Moore VI.
Kiey Rosenberg vs. Goldberg; Mangloue vs. Lafrsu
Wolfers VS.. Biedenbach; Ferris VI. Salomou Frank.
lin Fire Insurance Company va Gilmore. Orders