The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-01-26
DECISIONS.
SUPREME couRr-CHAMBzRs.

BY Juog0 Lawrence.
In the matter OF the New York Protestant Episoo.
pal Public School; Graham VS.. Board OF Assessors
Now YORK LadiOs' Home Mission Society Va Board Of
Firth VS.. Green; Newton vs.. Green; stears va
Green; Oppenhemer vs.. Green.-0rders granted.
Sanders W. cady; I ISdga SUson denied
Errico vs. Brand; Barbour vs. Woodwork; Alison
vs. Amos; In the matter OF Walker; the matter Of
Teats In Inc matter OF Smith; In the matter OF
Corp; In the matter Of Brown; In the matter Of
Brown; Bassiord vs.. Crickt0n; Wise Vs. Jacobs;
sickes Ricnardson; Flood vs.. Cushins.-Granted.
Siobert vs. Wilkinson; Chssebrough VI. Daily
Chsse6roIgh Va: DAILY; Gospp vs. Auiaagoi; AarKe'
Ford VS.. Joyce-Motion denied. Memorandum.
Green vs. Lee.-Meai0randum.
GcTxau0 vs.. Grupe-Grnnteu. Memorandum.
Jex VS.. Jasob.-Motion denied, without costs.
Cooper vs.. Williams.-I desire TO see counsel
Ahern smth.-No power
Stevenson Observation-Disclosures.
Sickes vs. Observation-Disclosures 81, 600
Cushing VS.. Getty.-Motion denied II plaintiff con-
sents " issue execution III ton days
Goddard We. Blake tNo 3I-Mot'on granted Eben
B. Shater appointed order 10 be Submitted.
McElwco va AoEiwee.-Afadavito OF service not sufa-
cient.
SUPREME CouRT-sPECIAL TERN.
BY Judge Lawrence.
Smith and others Va Smith and anotheI.-The plain
tins having voluntarily relnquished 10 the defendant
Susan L. Smith, all the property held by james r.
Smith trustee under tho will Of Horny H. Smith,
cannot now. IN my opinion question tho Title OF MIA
Smith such property executrtx oil nor husbands
Will Furthermore, 1t would also appear that the ju-
risdic0n Ut the Surrogate grant letters tesIa-
nleniary 10 Mrs. Smilh DO questioned IN tins
acton Tho nrst seclion OF the Act OF 1870 toha
359 OF the Laws VI 1870 provides that tho Surrogate
Of the county oil New YORK shalt have power ana ju
risdicti0n Issue all lawful process upon allegations
duly verified, to make and enter all lawful orders
and DEGREES Ia proceedings In the Surrogac's Court
and of the want oil jurisdiction shall
be taken " orders and except by appeal
manner prescribed by statute or IN proceeding
boioro the Surrogate 70 set ASIDE, open. vacatc or
modify OF DEGREES Of The said Court AS IL
exercised courts Of record OF general jurisdiction
IL Surrogate had The power the letters
testaontary tho remedy VI the paintn Is by moving
before him 70 modify his order, or by ap-
peaIing TO the General Term. l am VI the opinion,
therefore, that the defendant Is entited 10
Oh the demurrer, with costs.
Tappep, &c, w. Cxntweli and another. Fin diogs
and decree settled and signed.
COMMON pLEAs-CHAMBERs
BY Judge J. +. Daily.
In tho matter OF FabUrL-Order settled.
Biocn W.. Bloch-Divorce granted.
In the matter, &c, ot Hand, &c-PrOof Of sigma
turos OF administrator OF service Of ctstIon. How
as 10 advertisements tor claimsY
songer vs. ratrick.-Judge j. T. Daily did not SIT
lu Inc matter SC, OF Rugelman VS.. Ordeus.oin. -
State name, occupatOn residence ard place of bust
oi and residence OF assignee. See
T. chapter 466, Laws OF 1877.
MARINE CouRr-sPECIAL TERM
BY Judge snnotL
Draper va. Ailin. am me nts are allowed on
Schroeder vs. Simmonda = Motion granted, with
$40 costs abide event, Defendant allowed ten days
~ serve Dill OF particulars
Graham W. differentiation TO vacate order OF ar
rest Denied, win $40 costs
Kahn vs. Speldel Motion TO vacate order OF arrest
Denied without costs, but ban reduced 10 500.
Lasak vs. Albcrtson.-Motop denied, Win $40 costs.
Kingston vs.. simms-Mouon 10 disn,ss complaint
Granted, with COSTS and $40 costs Of motion.
Kitseli VS.. GinochL-Order granted
sweeny w. Brggs.-Motion 10 open default granted,
with $40 costs.
Scnmiat vs.. Administration granted, with costs
and $40 costs OF motion.
Patrons Paint Company vs.. WhytaL-M0ton to dis
charge defendant granted.
Perkins VS.. Mnl"r.-Proceodings dismissed.
Secor va n.-AtLacnment allowed; bail
$500
Henry VS.. Davis Order settled
Perry vs.. Fiskc.--Reercncc ordered
Baker vs. ConIin rotams vs.. Schuonberg; Franz
mun w. NIebhur; kodshedt vs. Schr
granted
senior We Kelly. Proceedings dismissed.
Quincy vs. Lincoln; Herman VS.. Witmark; Mclean
VS.. Lcauy; Muller vs.. Bedell; johnson Va. Potors
Mandson VS.. speizel Bandistel We. Menard; Darn.
stadt vs.. Mosoiy Dcyonge vs.. Miller; Kingsoy W.
Doitile; Tiffany co. Va Bierstadt; Rutzlcr Vi.
Barnes-OTders granted