The New York herald., 1878-09-15

derstan ding that the State would develop no new
point OF epgrossing interest did not diminish
the crowd There Interesting DIS
prte between counsel as 10 the disposition
Of clothes owned ty Hayden, the defence
refusing to yield them for the Court TO inspect evsn
and the prosecution claiming that as they might 10
tampered with and blood stains might be washed ou''
they should be now exhibited. Judge Harrison, VINO
Is conducting the prosecutor, said. dualy that no de-
sired thai they should be placed in the CUSTODY Of
some person 10 be designated by the Court Blood
STAINS would not be added, but they might DO ooer
ated. Judge Wilcox ssid pervously, after the argu
menIs: :-"rhe counsel says he Will not give up mo
clothes and therefore do not thipk there 10 any use
in making an order.n The other side promised that
the Court should have them al Iutare 'imo uu. 'nas
they were 10 be submitted 10 the oest expss. 10 lne
State VINO would carefully ex anime tnem The coun-
sci for the defence would rot say where .ns eo'nes
wore when sworn, defendiDg his reiicence on tho
ground that no was counsel 10 the accused.
Alexander R. Jonnson's testimony was that Mr..
Hayden requested MIN 10 take checked cotton shift
and PAIR OF pantaoons made from the same material,
which ne found At Mr.. Hayden's house last sunday,
Mr. Hayden dIrccting him 10 lake tnem, and wneh
belonged TO Mr.. Hayden.
sylvester Hawisy, OF North Madison, saw no blood
Mary StaDnards hands, out there was some on
Mira Luzerne Stevens also said. she blood
tho sIs sae OF the spas,sred nearly to the
eye; there blood besides on The right side ol tho
body and on the back. THIS witness saw hr; nayden
return about eleven O'Clock, having with nim nis
two children. These two chidren were seen by Mr..
Stevens twice the same forenoon, going both north
and south. Mr Hayden drove north going sway.
TIE STAINED KNiPE.
The defence showed IT'S DRIFT conccrning Inc knic,
which occastoned the Sensation with It's bieod legacy
yesterday, by bringing out answers that Mr. HAydens
wiIn,n several weeks, as lar as mrs stevens knew;
she visited at Mr Heyden's but never witnessed the
cutting up OF beeistssk with penknifs; Mr.. Hayden
might have gone In ami Qua OF bis house during The
afternoon IN question without her knowledge.
taaf WHAT HAYDEN SAID.
A member OF the jury OF inquest, Edward B sian
nard. OF North Madison (not relative OF me niur-
dered gir told some taings OF interest He was not
present whcn body was found; Mr.. Hayden was
vt tne Inquest and said &c went to nIdoieiown the
day OF The murder; came down from Durhsm, past
Mr.. Stannards; stopped TOR a drink ol water, which
uudsrsood nim 10 say he got; then got bis
rage; Mary near The spring ON his way home; got
out took another drink, got IN, thanked her; had NO
further versAucn anu went on hume; Understood
him 10 say Mary called Monday and Tuesday IL thnkl
" see him; SHE looked on Monday depressed and
melancholy; he SAID Mary did pot say she hsd any
trouble; Mr. Hsyoen before the jury, in reply TO
semstnIng Juscs Stone said In reference TO any one
OF Tho jury asking questions, spoke up ana said De
(Haydsn) wished thus final "a hnai examnatioul;
In the above referred to the Wednesday, after the
murder; before the inquest saw Hayden as about
seven or eight O'Clock IN tho morning Wednss DAY,
as was my way TO Mr.. Stannard's; he was rid
ing gu load Of wood his horse no was arass,nS .c-
load went up By the tencs and beckonod me to come
there; he asked mo II they had gwen in the verdict
(the jury had bssn in session in toe early morn.
ing a. Mr. Sannard's): TO that time he nAd not
been before our jury; said NO; don't remember
that at that timo said any thing more; SAW hun
again before heappearod before toe jury; saw hm at
his house, outsdc the roadside ana he asked again
II thoy gwen IN verdict; was walking along,
and he stepped and asked me that question;
again Answered no; he might nave spoken again.
but don't rome mber what he said doo', remember
OF speaking to him again until alter the funeral;
then Tn ursday, and saw him near the house,
about lour O'Clock In day he was IN tho road hc
again asked what the verdict was; told MIN tuat
in substance II that u murder bad been done by
some person or persons unknowa 20 the jury;
don't remember what he said 10 shat, for stopped
but a moment and passed on; saw the body before
IL was washed, aud bosd spattered on The face,
but more was on the nands.
On the crosse xaminstion the witness said that he
did At The time mentioned form an opinion that
Mr. Hayaen desired 10 avoid au vsstgxiiou; 'Ar.
Hayden looked ANXIOUS and so did /; know (em-
phaIicaliy) that AE Hayden used the word '1naP be-
fore jury and told several persons OF his
preston could not say whether tho wora 'lpsl sp-
pmed TO Mr. Hayden or 70 the whole sxa,ninston."
Judge Harrison, for The prosecution, desired
Charles s. Stannard, The father OF the murdered gr,
say II he knew when his daughter came homo that
she was pPsgnanS 10 dissIpate iunors shat he mad
motive Tor IN ordering her. and Siannard answered
that he did know she was pregnant swear that
he thought she was." I