New-York tribune., 1878-04-18

tanning the BOardman will case were ruled out py INC
Court. Ex-Judge Fullerton made remark h 10"
tone regard 10 OF the tesmony Y, ana MI ohae'
objected to this method Of throwing In uncer'one SUE
gestiOns.
Jucg, Fuerton-" admit that your voice is louder
one than mine"
Mr. shafer-" II may be unfortunate for me that
have nors lungs than and he more brain" than l. ou'
don't like to be constantly reminded OF the fact'"
Rinaldo L. Tilton was the last witness for the pla'
tiR lie cx lained his relationship to hFs' newer, ~
saying, oar iahcrs were brothers hers en- T" wpe both
born in Dcerfeld n. H. They attenden scmo9l in@ She
hfd and Hent bouso with her uncle Greenwood,
Mass while studying muse twcnty-iour years a<r
T|brnaTy 1857 lie witness III the employ OF Newcli
& smith On Canal-st. on February Il, 1865, hc taW
registered in Mr. Newcs handwriting III tue res'SI w
Eares Hotel The names OF L. d. Newell ahd e. NJ olheE,
OF providence r. l. Mr. shafor inquired II the Wines
was relative of Theodore TiitOn; The answer, MOI
that | am aware Of" caused considerable laughter
Mis- Newell was sworn, To prove that tlele was no
Judgment or decree for divorce the ground Of adultery
against her ana in favor of her u'hand Lorenzo d.
Newell, in any Of the courts Of this state.
Mr. Arnold, in opening the case for the defence argued
that evidence had been adduced by the plaintiff Wcl
would indicate that Miss O!ney other than puI e,
minded woman, whose only association with Mr. Newell
had beer of business or innocent social Character me
counsel promised prove that on the other hand. Mrs
Newell mad been guilty OF rank violations OF her mar
would asi the Court 10 dissolve the marriage the
strength of the proof against the wife. .,,-,-..r
was called as the first witness the defence She was
entirely sefpOsscssCd and continued 10 toy carelessy
with her large fan during the exanmatlon me 4S
exhibition OF her nervousness was frequent repeIGn
the request for water which Kept one OF the 1caS
OF the court busy running back and forth with the COB
let MI Shaer asked the witness to state the purport
coming 10 New-YOrk," the witness answered, 81 was
accustomed write TO HIM once or twice eacn time he
went to Paris, which ordinarily was Twice year.
told him what goods wanted MN To bny ana WhrIe 10
find After he became landlord OF the premises
SSisp0df SGs Frequently wrote when M" Fn %ent places
of amusement would tell MN Wmon n, !
Of interest, hut anything of private nature on
the two occasions when she crossed the ocean WIN
with other ladies' she did not know where his
was Miss Olney cCnradiced many other statements Of
municatng with MIR. Newelrs in hotel at Liverpool or
at any hotel he never i'll her room IN his shirt
closed after O'Clock in the evening, so that u wOud
have been impossible Tor any one TO have seen her ana
Mr. Newell in the situation described by one witness
Mr.. Newell mad never remained III her room as Iale a!
O'clock the door TO her large SOON was never locked
while he there, though they sometimes went mo
the extension" and locked the door IN cro's'Nmm' ID
nptiOn Miss Ouey denied most OF the statement OF the
The deposition of Mary f. Campbell, of Boston, was
read. she being unable to be pre- sent she was cham
bermaid and waiting gwOman she stated nj NO II Soni-
ersct-st Boston, where Mrs. Newell boarded IN 1870.
She was accustomed attend to Mrs. Newells room.
One morning about O'Clock, she met man about MY
wears of age whom she did not know coming down the
stairs from Mrs. Newes room. When she knocked at
Mrs Newes door, Mrs Newell came to the door IN her
nirht-lress When Mis- Newell went out the witness
room, which led her TO believe that man
had passed The night there. Mrs. Newell was
ordered to leave the house that day by TIE
ldndady The witness, IN the evening found
Mrs Newell crying She asked the witness not 10 tell
aHyOne that she had man coming out Oi hti
room or that she had seen anyone In the entry. while
the witness viugin Montgomery place. MIS- Newer
came to see her one day with Colonel Pickering, and
promised her home and $1,000 she would lot TESTIFY
against Mrs. Newell. Colonel Pickering said lie would
take her to his home. When the witness told them
that she valued her own soul more than money, Mrs.
Newell threatened tell all the priests in Boston about
her, and TO tell Cardinal McClOSkcy, too. For, Mrs.
Newell SAID, she knew the Cardinal well. The witness
did accept any Of her offers. Mis- Newell sad II
she were beaten she going intOa convent near
Paris Colonel Pickering, before they went away put
his arms around Mrs Newell and kissed her.