Gold Hill daily news. [volume] (Gold Hill, N.T. [Nev.]) 1863-1882, 1878-06-01

DlnItu Notu WoltA osu XVIII
detailed statements Of the manner In which
garling intimidation, etc.. In his parish.
he was OF the opinion that because no
would not carry out the ideas OF Governor
Kellogg and Others, they were DESTROYS Of
driving him out Of the parish.
In an interview with Governor Kellogg.
he was asked how his (Anderson's) parish
was going. aud no replied about fifteen
hundred Democratic majority. Governor
Kellogg said: "ThAt will never do" and
suggested that Anderson rally the colored
voters Of the two polls and carry them,
and let the remainder Of the polls 20 Dem.
ocratic; remArklng further. that witness
might then get up q disturbance. end. In
consequence thereof, throw the Democratic
votes out.
A document was produced purporting
10 be an affidavit which had been signed
by the witness and Don A. Weber. Super
visor OF West Feliciana Parish, wherein
those gentlemen refused 10 sign . protest
against the result OF their parishes. They
knew that large Democratic gains had been
obtained by legitimate means. Tho origi-
nal Of this affidavit witness said WAS re-
Gently In possession Of Hon. Stanley
Matthews.
While In New Orleans no heard that
John Sherman was In tho city DESTROYS 10
see Don Weber snd himself. w%hereupon
they called at the Vt. Charles Hotel to sec
bn, 10. .ns.o..,sJ In andinv him a,
Wn,.;s.s po.,.n..n Canal .treet Wsber
sJv.ncs5 All .dd,csseJ sherman. The
i.,,sr ro,n.S. "Gsn,lcmcn u am
LII a. ".a 49,, con,inning shs,,r.n
snI ~ $3.50 a.. .n,
ss'u uen'e1'n ~ ,Is, Ia,
~ . unueIs'Anu 'hc.o ~ ao"'0 MN wy ~
!our r.sPee.l,e pai'soes.
mne "nsh ,ne Atan.' ~ 49, .pa +
.loAn anu u W psu'y w. :. .
u"s. y'u w." sal a. Iii.
hn,. ~. saI ,,'o dt.nu,a y,
umu.y wy weum,iea u9 u'pSao,,s.
IacAa'u Anu ne,'oss, SUI Me'' 'onis,n
"" iea'o 'heir IesPcou.o Pat.sn
shu IN tho event oI raSAA'u
eiecnoh ~ uovernor, We VIII ger
nothing from the NATURALIZATION, where.
upon There were assured ny SmermAn I'M,
control tue Federal patronage. ~ no ue,
,ired OF Them was tnAt they stahu nsm .ha
,et uho recofd run along ssI'n; AieI wv
lapse OF SNORT time Mepcr anu nnuelson
coneludeu 70 oiSAi = Ic''er " on.in
morning him una' .hey wsie no. SATISFIED
WIN uleir cohversauon WIN Nun IN ~
5arus hAvihs peen taken cAio VI hnu ~
guessing mat he INFORM them q Within
a. 10 whom they should 100 ior inc inihi'
ment OF nus promises;
hiscock' Batter AMI COX OF mo commit
zee objected 20 the reading OF Vas
e en,,r - p Ri. m I,,a. n ~ s %pus eop, ,tIn.
n y nI H., sLo,m,n .honid A., .as
the document, and II ho recognized IL a. q
copy OF his reply. Then, U o until 'heh'
'h9uiu u ~ Ssa AnIen :" s s ;or Char.
man. said. in rcply 10 a question, that he
had no knowledge Of shermAn's ever hav.
Ing written such . letter.
Butler offered . resolution. which was
adopted. providing that tho paper. AZ iden.
titled. bo received, but not read until SEQ
Rotary Sherman be- called before the Com
mitteo aud have an opportunity TO see H.
whereupon Chairman Potter notified sher'
man OF the action OF the Committee:
.dS.".aa5 y" w,h"r s,s,inS ~; p.slorJ
wa raising hi. because Of their refusal
to protest against tho returns in their ro.
'pss'lse parishes. ,..
haguires Negotiations Win Bee'