The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-04-16

should desire my should 10 welcome 10 my
win. ms Vii eo.s As u = "''4 Years Of agony 'aA'
have ut asked lin - , NJ. n inc a, mr.
sha not TINA me s,kn Coo mich am q Ing 30 ask
and tow other hins o''"'" a'sSs Tor The OCCASION
shan DO Obliged work hasts Ifit shah b. Meas
ssua he .@I sa es ys
the wav last came
for sad. mi have greater proof than
hoping TO see you very soou. am
Tho next Two letters left Mrs. Newell.rat NOR,
composed Sne let her veil down and looked calmly
three days before Mrs. Ncwcii's marriage, June g.
1906
THE ONLY osm EVEN LOVED.
9Ts % DAs a S. s,ss q s re as
many kindneses have bestowed and f,r the
acar deaf iudusont friend yon have been. Tor dearest
out my ssSoy been 20 a.hs
one ,ha, could hail Wit rlsdnsss.
except few hours Of app,ness and those heas have been
s % ys aS 1s
. 's ss i ss : . i nv I'd
mo ins n that ' S ~ o9 sGs s
pleasure OF seeing Accept. dearest taousanas Of
Ss love- ansesio% and devotion ny Sosas
% yoa pp" a sd pro PEI ad
tina, may last in that better world where
PLEASE EEAR, CONE EARLY "
In letter aa,ed Angus, -. 1865, addressed ''My
own dearest friend, :" she wrtcs:-
spend tho evening with me: please. DEAR come early
70 sAss sss evening"
mos eonvsnsnt os yoa L. US dsaress 20 ont :Tiv,ns
shah have the pleasure eiag you soon small 10
evening With much love I am. svs' ar'oc'iona..y,
coxnxsroyprycr win PARIS.
In letter dated New York. November Q. sho
writes:- H NM
Ny owx DxAprsr osx-ssiil believs mo when toll 700
that thought ui mino thousa Ihanks aud
my weeping eyes tell OF my gratitude.
This letter sen, back from Paris is Endorsed in
indA rting which the Witness tPicksring) identne1
MS that OF Mr. boardinan, AZ iollows:-
Addres. j. H. shilsky No o. Rue keheiieu. or In
Mr. TSbss called iss. evening for Tow s.omeass aud
told him ,has ala no. expect TO see him time had a.
into tue Boston POS, Office or leave 1t at tho fremont
send the note as you desired.
On tho inside envelope the folowing:-
In sn:s Of accident 50 mo Is 1G.s . e pe
RKCEss.
Mr.. Shafor continued 10 have the witness identify
letters of Mrs Newell, which were then read court.
Ono OF these was dated Paris April IL, 1872. Mira.
Newen asked the recipient " come 10 Europe assur.
ing him that tho weather was charming. "Do you
wish to me Pr shc asks III you will not
ask me do ever think OF you because. you know,
you arc never out oil my mlnd" hon she went
10 state that she needed money TO settle bills
among which was one OF PHI ysic,an for 500 irancs
Tho next lc,tcr shown witness was dated '3i OF
October, 1861" and was In French Witness said he
was unable translate md il was laa aside. MI
Shafer asked whether Mrs. Newell failed
ceaImen. OF viii made by ". ii. Board,nsn N ner
favor. Witness sa,d he did not know.
MIR. Ten Eyck objected and Mr.. Shafcr exclaimed
that no had u rigNs 10 show that attempted 10
prove That and was ovetthrown on account OF tne
aton tina, she had borne to the deceased 81 have
right" he sad, 40 show that rough inas
she got thousands and thousands OF dollars IRON
HIM during ms lifetime his mistress, but she
that IL ooncesicd" Mr. SKATER Questioned wi,aess
length tho history Of Boardnan will suils
Newell. 800
That lady, witness said, discovcrcd evidence OF .
wiz and naa procsea,oEs 10 the Probate Court 70 ex
before Judge Ames and was dismissed accom-,
Of iniormaty. Witness next drew up and nled pcst
by examination Of parties named
II evidence respecting tho win 20 that might DO es
tsb,ishsd
Mr. shsfer-rhat 10 you nlod petition to examine
parties 10 " 10 got evidence sothat you might
draft petition Tor the purpose OF establishing will
Lsushtor.) st
witnsss-Yes, sir.
Witness won't on 70 testify that there was then
mem. Win ,nrss coscs me case was .rsS 10 inc
Supreme Court OF Massachusetts, on appeal from the
ourrogases decision against tho probate Of thu wi
tribunal supported tho decision OF tho Surrogate
and an appeal was taken TO the Supreme Court
OF 100 United States, who're tho case is
damsgcs against revcrai persons Tor suppressing
tho win; she claimed about S4.Oooo0o; witness
"
although benjamin. 4. Butler argued the case for
MAN III ana the ptod Staes Circuit Court
ine oomurrer AN held that had no claim: tho
appcaI from tnst was the matter which wltness
csinod was stiIi pending: The will claimed by
made ia 1883 ana In II he left her
an annuity OF $500 for hfe; that suisse
quently on tho 18Th OF May 1872 he made a codc,i
d.y,sns TO her piece OF real estate on Mount Vernon
street ,oston 10 lie or sole 10 nj lie elt
nor a. hrs rcsduary egace The surn of $500 600 Tor
tho purpose OF establ,shing q homo tor tho working
women or boston anu rnas as resiousry Isgstee ana
A. trustee OF that sum she was entitled 10 what re-
NAMED OF his estate after certain egsctes should bo
paid: this remainder would DO about 81 0o0, 600 or
s. $4,000
Colonel Fellows protested that they were not trying
tho Bosrdmsn viii case Court ruled Tn ~ the
line OF examination was improper.
the last question intcnd put that subjcct.
COUNSEL os coLoxyLs.
CoiousI Foows-I never knew Q man who could
retreat more graceiu!iy lbau MIR. shafer.
Mr SLafcr-t ddn't learn u by being q colonel,
either Turning to wi,ncssl-rhcy call you Colonel
PICKERING DO they no,f
witucss-l was not aware OF H. SIR
Colonel Fellows nero are many coioncls that never