The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1878-01-20
MEJUODTSTS ON HE'LL.
A 0ue.tinn ~. 10 How the subject OF Future
Punishment should he Presented

T,on ne ~ lf1 Tunes
The Methodist preachers. met ycs'erday
,rniue ia their ruoin. % Wash ngtpn -ir ~
g. siding Elder Willing occupied the chhlr
~ smhloei Of die 'useiun WITS the second COM
he nv " " rarslur-i ofI.rcd rosolq,
MO ilc fr.ri Mat. us N.t. WIS sgnic d'uh
, to the views uf thr MihQd-l fps'vrn'
iurah regarding future runishucnt. inc hnV'
4 Wiiliuy y ~ tr.-iiu. ON 'or. b. re-
.urst .d to prepare and road pclprH th' h,V't'nij
n authoritative statement OF the boliel oil
T5c r,,s i ~" Cdm,mi,ro THROUGH pr. Our
rro,,.t,'d "a substitution Tor Mr.. pnrkhursi's
lotion a. the cir. ot that the suhrct Tor diHcus-
n,, ~, itn tt.nrhcr-' meeting next MOnlny be-.
How shall We Tcach the Doctrine Of Future
Dr. NJ 'Chcsnoy-The substitute offered by the
business Commute" assumes my We u yI
know how 70 trent the doc,rnc o iu, nd rr l,
luton and 30 We must urcl mr., '' XXI .' rnJ,
the whole matter don't believe That tuis hnuy
administers need instruct Sa'n 2n,ipt haym a",
INTO thr Methodist University II we hadn't p'cn
examined regarding the do trlnc. TINS su,ns,l-
lutte intimaios that somebody must com. mere
md t"a,h H. how to preach the doctrine Moth
odism H. Understood IN THIS cpminunny. IL mas
been hmn 'S pos ,nr ry pa @p
your hell Reporters tell us the same thing
We ought to Dc, able 10 preach 50 that We won, won,
have 10 preach the next Sunday to explain what
we meant the SUNDAY before,
pr Thoma--Thc method Of teaching IA n
practical question worthy oi, study; ihyslclans
get together and ask zach other How shat We
trout this diaeasef' Lawyers consult .ach other
nbout upints In legal practice. THIS dOrrn" OF
future pun shmeni IL no, now taught one-tcnth
M much as it used To be- Dr. Ryder breaches
more about hell than does any Methodist MN
istor In the city We allbcliuv that thcriemrnt
of fear has its proper place. We lwlieye therc
IL penalty to law. r' Hear hcnt. How are
VIZ to property present these things
Dir Quincy substitute thc crinnht'e ol ,
fcrs nn4umes that you de- know how, and can toll
what Won know. Il iu nuwi-r rem T. on IN" IN,
formation Of the minister's. Some ol us J.
won't say thai-turre DrN som %! n VINO u9h
know hu,y go preach future punishment Ih'N
believe IN 40 eternal hrl und ~ 40 lrvhnll"h
after death. hui thoy rr'urh So ihll ninety me
people IN Ivory hundred think they don nn-
licvc in any he'll Mnt dp n'iieNr IN aitrr-dFuii
probation. pr 1h,w-- two sermons an I
seem to me 60 aGler. lie say thcy do. Inc
quest on b. Il there g. % nell. how are We To
teach ~ ?
MIR. Bristol. young minister. said 4 was hs
duty to preach She Cuttrlu"- al ihr Nriiio li-l
Church or leave that Church. II" would Ike
thor, FORE ~ know what the d' irinc- OF the
Methodist Church wlr. 49,,
Broth.r Odrll. an c'd rly ayman. said that
Methodist anil other nln.-t o. " e. getting IN
10 Wnv of lno.i.ins tu thru'd belieis cndwi-'
10y saying that the liilr wasn't translated riEht
lLaught .rl lnrn v O. = ting lo be- many
lihliral institutes for fhr ud-fnshiunci du Pc
trin,- 7 laughter II " uudDd ms irrlne'
after hr hud h'iipv. q thing for So long that be
isaliy thought lt WAS ifu.. 60 h' told tlai n Ma'
rll "a mi-irin-lailun; q wasn't ~ IA the urecf
Testament.
MIR Pnrkhurst said ne took exception to ti'
nllusium Too hill 'ai ln-t;ut p. The l.hris 81 "a.
man hud been CALLED lu question Who lad re-
ccivcd thorough Theological training.