Staunton spectator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1896, 1878-07-16
LEGAL NOTICES.
NAkGIN1A-IN VACATIoN.-In the Circuit
Court for Augusta county, June 18th, 1878.

LEUAL NOTlCES.
ViEGlNIA.IN vAcAT1oN.-In the Circuit
Court for Augusta county, June nth, 1878.
r. M Finleys Plaintiffs.
IN q, "a, VS..
iI IN Goccs.,, So, Defendants,
Inis cause came on to be heard again this day
III me R papers formerly read and the report Of
| ing the default of j. N Finley. 81 III. Finley. 4.
3: Shirey, Cyrus D: Reeves, Ex'or OF David
gust y, 1875 and payable one and two years re-
spectively after date given for the Ist and End
1eierred payments on the Home farm bought
eye sa hv o. rdniey IN this cause and was ar
On consideration whereof, it is adjudged, or
aeLsd ana deereed that rules issue against the
sald ). y: FINLEY, ]. NJ. Finley, Cyrus D. Reeves
Ex'0r Of David Reeves, decd, and W. 81. Shirley,
returnable on the first day Of the next term OF
any, why decree shall not pass for the resale
OF said tract OF land for their continued default
ana sucn other decree as may seem proper to
scented that said J. N. Finley Is anom-rssdent
OF this State, the Clerk will, upon affidayit be-
ce Of sa ID ms rna } publish due
one Of the newspapers, published in staunton.
which publication shall be equivalent to per
1t appearing by affidavit filed that ]. N. Fin.
ley ts nonresident Of this State, 1t fs ordered
that he appear before the Circuit Court for Au-
Term, 1875 Of said Court, and protect his Inter
est in the matter Of the Rule Aforesaid.
Echois. Bell cat1ett, p. q q. N RYAN j ya4
WI eGINIA.-In the Circuit Court OF Au-
gusta county, June 18th, 1878,
n. Plaintiff.
VS..
WIZ. a. ADney, Defendants,
In Ct0nce7y,on a Rule, &c.
Michael g. Hartman, the purchaser of the
share Of VIM. A. Abney in what is known as
n 1if not cd In Fa0(
Of stanton, and heretofore sold by Comm'rs
Niche and Young, having departed this life,
the q he OF
1T is ordered that q rule be awarded returnable
to the first day Of the next Term against Lewis
said Michael g. Harman. Caroline ". Hartman,
the widow and legatee Of said Michael q. Har-
Asbr E1s and h Ss %
A. Kerans and Caroline, his wife, Thomas Opie
and Sallie, his wife, John N. Opie, Mamie F.
s opie
having departed this nfe,-all legatees Of said
Michael q. Harman, to show cause, If any they
be resold to pay the purchase money.
1t appearing BY affidavit filed that Robert G.
Eve and Willie r.. his wife, Thomas Opie and
Sallie his wife, are non-residents Of this State,
it is ordered that they do appear before the Cir
cult Court of Augusta county, on the first day
OF the November Term. 1873. Of said Court and
aforesaid. Teste,
Do yorn. J. N. RYAN, OK, C1'k;
v gusta county, June 10Th, 1875:
Simpson F. Taylor's Admir-. Plaintiff,
against
VT. Moon, Defendants,
In Cha1scegy on a Rule, &c.
The second and third bonds Of M. G. Hartman,
and Hugh w sheney, for the purchase money
Cemm'r James Bumgardner, Jr., under a de-
cree in this cause. 1t is ordered that the Clerk
Ex'or of NJ. G.. Hartman, decd, Caroline v. Har-
man, widow of NJ. G. Harman, decd, Lewis
Hartman. Asher W: Hartman, Jr., Alexander
wife, Thomas Opie and Sallie Opie. his wife, L.
A. Kerans and Caroline Kerans. his wife, John
meant o chren 3pp ne dee
heirs-at-law and devisees of NJ. G. Harman,
decd. and Hugh w. Shetfey, returnable to the
any they can, why said lot should not be de-
creed to be resold ON account OF said default in
paying the purchase money, and that said rules
be executed as to Thomas Opie and Sallie Opie,
his wife, and Robert C. Eve and Willie H. Eve,
publication, upon proper affidavit being filed.
Thomas Opie and sallie opie, his wife, Robert
residents of this State, it is ordered that they
do appear before the Circuit Court Of Augusta
COUNTY coy on the first day OF the November Term
in the matter OF the Rule Aforesaid.
Teste,
J. N. RYAN, Cpk.
Shelley Bumgardner, p. q. jy2-4t
COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, l
Staunton, June 9th, 1878.
ITO James A. Frazier-IdEe NoticelThat
i in pursuance of an order of the Circuit
Court for Augusta county, 10th day OF June,
1878, in three causes therein depending in chan
Gerry, under the styles of James A. FraZier's
Guardian VS.. John w. Frazier's Widow and
heirs, &C.; and stephen Porter and Wife's
Admr's VS.. VIM. Frazier, &C.; and Stepen A.
Porter and Wifes Adm'rs, and James A. Fra
zier VS.. VIM. Frazier, &C., SHALL on
Wednesday,. The TN day Of august, 1878,
at my office IL Staunron, proceed to ascertain
and report, LIST, What abatement should bs
made in the fee contracted to be paid T. j.
Niche by James A. Frazier and his mother for
services in causes by reason of the death of Mr..
payments were made to Thomas J. Niche on
account of his fee in these causes. 3d. What
contract Echols, Bell & Catlett had with James
A. Frazier and his mother and s. A. Porter for
ther lee in these causes, and whether their fee
has been reduced to O Judgment. and all the
facts connected Herewith. 4th, What contract
said James A. Frazier has made with S. v.
SOuthall, or any other counsel engaged by him
in any of these causes, and the amounts charge
able against him for such services. 5th Wheth- |
err the fees of said Niche, and Echols, Bell &
stitute liens upon any fund in these causes and
If SO, their relative priority with other charges
upon the fund. 9Th, Any other matters deemed
pertinent by Com'r or required to be stated spe
cially by any of the parties.
At which time and place you are required to
attend. J. w. GREEN SMITH, Com'r.
g. M. Cochran, p. q. jy2-4t