Daily press and Dakotaian. [volume] (Yankton, Dakota Territory [S.D.]) 1875-1880, 1878-11-30
TINE wsysoas CASE.
cd Through IN Acquaintance W1ths
One Of the 4Arties.

An AAnhlr In which Ia Inherent.
ID Tnro..h an Ae.Ssint.ne. WseS
~. =, a.r,,..
m.,,.,.. rN,,.,..
DsD'0 In 'st. =
!. Yesterday aieernoen.9e famoels ~ q
Ad~elltlGers& Co.ivsss W moN AN 70 =
eoddsa conclusion, 40. q the seme am :
as complete IN is vlnaica..on "
the defendant as 'na1 ge1.lem1n Of any y.
his TRENDS could AYE oes;l1u "h.n
words, the Plalntlh oism.sSa t. .nn s T. ..nsn,
everything Was ellA.!nsse NJ 1 ~. r.. ~
the q1est'on ~ AT 49, ~
noss eso lelty e.tsS1..e.sf.- ;o,. IN
Inc case a. sts.ea ~ . .Aia. h;a.o-s "a
TINS psPer, wiz 20 uoMa o .a,".s ..sr ,r;ed
one o. Ine MosI All ne n,sl;m;n.rv
IN an lo1a coar': ...a .;,.n IL n. REGIS.
polns 1na ~, 49,. ths sr;,i lad
tsl y. sson = y,oers.: .svar.i davs.
a'r T osen ~ a p, merosS Il ,be Gnthrie
LUG . 49,, isst F.hrnsrv hv M%ell,noer 4
G G.l:. ~. & nm md H. .,tach;no Mr..
vTy nronerty' a fine farm worth thirty
.ne"..nS Saliors Tha deeendant made an.
sH.r md Sied a cro.s claim for.SaOOO O Ann.
~. ~ the E.rch term vhen the cssa
e. cot ~ trial. ia defendant announced
him,elf ready. In, the plaintiff asked and
. continuance. Meantime Mr..
W.tmo,e had emnlovrd Judge Carpenter. of
Gn,hr;a conntv for lila a%ttorney. and Judge
Sn;nL az Yantton VAS retained AZ asso.
ciste counsel Messrs. s.. John 4 Williams
slso annaar.d "a c,nnsel In the trial at Des
Mn;nas 4 laroe number If denositions
100 tsL.n IN nsLota terr;tnrv inclndinp
hoe "f he governor ;ndges Of The supreme
nc inc ~. forced dasd. vore uttered Mr..
co,id not have been in Iowa.
At the October term the case was again
called and ina defendant announced his
.rssS;neas to nraceed with The trial When the
nIa;n,;H .slel for n change Of venue. allep.
no that = fair hearing could not be Obtained
~ Gnthr;e Dallas or Adair counties. Some
n,aar tes,;monv v.s nrodnced in behalf of
NJ, me- cheese 9ne v;,pes. testified that the
st,orna.s fn- the defanse bed snch an ,nfn.
ence n Guthrie tbat a fair trial vould be
;mnoss;bIe. and VEL IN helms asked tn noint
ont The ATTORNEYS for The defense. WAS un.
.hie to do "a. and identified another LAWYER
Tho was not connected with #. Under HE
Law hove,er the court had no remedy az.
oent ~ "ron, ,he chance and Tho cass c.n,e
~ poSk count. vhsre ;ts ,r;si 90 com
nanoad lat Enel a ,arsa nnmher Of w;t,
nos.es -. o"am;,od I'D I'll ~ a,;damo.
&C. es, H. nIa;n,;a: had ha.n snhn,;,,od and
most e hot for tho defense whs, ~
Thnrad.v afternoon. the defendants sonphI
~ ;n,rojnce certs;n evidence ~ move 81.
nenses Incurred nv defendants in prenarino
,ha;r d.fan.a .ni Tho cnnrt ho,d;ne Tho,
nndar The stains Of the case 1T that time the
same W., ;madmisssble. the defendanl,s
Eoonn,e, d;sn;ssad The tvo iast counts in the;,
connter and crosa.cla;m the same heinz for
10 damaass incurred bv Tho defendant IN
.hs nranae.t;om ~ h;s ieeanse and siso "a,
sv.mnlarv nv v;nd;ct;ve dam.oes TSan
. fter = iono Consultation hetxeen Tho Main.
IFS and ,Se;r attorney. Mr. Wr;obt nna
of ,ha;r ot,ornevs J;sn;sssd Tho nis;n;;@,s
cansa Of sot,on' This dismissal Of Main.
t;fss CAGE we deem to he a v;rtns, ackpowi.
edonent tha, The r,o;nt;As had s,,ed ~
wrong man.
We learn that Mr.. Wa,mora Ill, mo-