The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1878-06-25

Weber Tor presuininR to demand written
Was not his word sufficient without such
Runrantcr.' she asked.
Odd you think il right to sign Mr.. Sher-
mans name To nlettcr which might compromise
him hereaftcrY A.-Now YOU go too fast. 1t
poured gil on the troubled waters for the time
being ] met Mr.. sherman atterward during
the count in Mr.. Kelloggs Office. bat | never
mrcnii4,neI 1t TO him 1t WIS a small affair; l..
mere accident? A.-Oh. no. sir. was thcre
very often during the count. II had my mem
oranda here could lel you precisely but they
are 80 voluminous that could not bring them
o. n you had informed us Of the fact. we
would have taken measures to have gOta freight
train To bring them up. How many interviews
did you have with Gov Kellogg with regard to
the count while the visiting statesmen were In
New OrlennsY A.-Oh. had II good many. He
WIS ike Mercury. he was always flying around,
and lust spoke To- him on tho wing. This was
there. Mr.. Garfield. Gen. sheridan. und several
others. did not fatigue my memory with the
Q.-What reason could you have had on the
2Oh OF November To deceive two 81 your init
mate friends in the interest OF a stranger.whom
man was merely one of the visiting statesmen,
and ns such deserved honor ut our hands. |
had no desire TO serve him particularly. was
merely maintaining the dignity Of the party.
These were men high in the councils OF the ma
tion and do you suppose | wished thom to
know whnt n contemplate strata We had in tho
party In Louisiana at that time ? II was for the
honor Of the party. ! did not want them TO
that verbal assurances had been given. and she
gave him and Anderson the false one to keep
",y"i ON No "Srtv aud th"ug6t ihot ihis
assurance would Keep him from selling out to
BY Gen. Butler-Haye you found any letters
since you were examined on Saturday which
you can produce? Alvin have some letters
mere t2mqrrow when ini4k might nserfsI
you get that letter from Mrs. Weber? lGreat
O.-IInye Won any Of Anderson = lettars9 A 49,
an, E o avss ~, ny I'll, Vii sei
dunine package of letters and LOOKING over Over
'l H llym cot, rrod,co-
Tho Wit11essppN1Nv con,nose vonraelf Con.
erai fi'aughtsri Anderson wrote To- me- md
stated II % sna %hSusso nm mat 6ad feTH
asylum' Now have here mv retiv 10 him
should like TO Know how YOU cot those Cher
letters
derson letters are not couchcd in such styl" as
wouid edify Won: / Know You are nowery
.is - osk me- No xilI teik bon tbes Ie,t,rs
another time.
oLIigafinns to Gov KalIoge ara nV won ny" NV
sir. and never have been Ii was a mere party
matter that he was seated. II he had been a
Fsise Isiander he vyouII have hsen seated nil
tho same
On your letter to Gov. Kellogg YOU refer to
a iuyStariptIs letter Now | find
about that letter, What letter WAS h YOU we're
rsf,rrinv 10 Mas il mn the sn-cail,I Shar.
man letter. Al think not. because at that
tnrSed 10 ' il nj II mieht have BEEN thn wonderfu
Nash document that wns referred TO-
O-Oh MOI You couId NOT mass Tint off on
mo What letter was ~ AEbidnt Gov. Kci.
ioeg furnish the letter ~ Gen ButierY | never
VS., tHn III anv,b nc ~ ,,oiiics an, snrs il
MA h very ,ntnresib n,,mant nnnb
us W vi la,, I ,nsbv bn
Q."And want to get, sst hold 81 that tale
viii n tale unfold iLauchter.l
o. am waiting Tor il To- unfold now. Laugh
, uriolI A. 'n'hk " VIII Jake Somo 'me ior 10
1.-The Administration was not very friendly
TO Anderson at that timcY Ait was not very
| iiaughter1
Twas il not the sherman letter that Kellogg
thiSs n r.,arJ 70 bs sest 10 nottbinE
So 80 ~ 0 " w
o.1Dld you furnish any other letters to Kel-
Sa oeF Iav, h,I PHe D'u i' s''' '' "
70 AnIer."n,s ie,ter was never returned To
| voN y Nn I'M he nu.,nt tn have rst1irnrd il
r. mo 1bo voi tbink II there Was anv surh N
se we woI i haHe dede sFG m w 1 ag money
WIZ y ood wouiu mol nave gwen UP 'ha' ie''er
20 sHITTc Sbarrnan le,tar this nhrose.
Your note OF even date" Do You nsc that
,h,ns, When vou ,vri'e% ANy,s air vsrv
! anitn" shhrcvi9te II in tba, wav '''' wy
! O-Haye Won any letters which YOU can pro-
| M Ksiloy,, "an ten Nm II anght"r
vi; does , f, snnear in ANY ot yn,r lot,ers
| A u, n,ia,bt No, bhve hean necesssrv 10 have
nod ~ 81 n1i,ht MOI hav,. ansyvnred the letters
On th" dav rersi,ved N"'0 ''''' ''0''
| n IT, iotter to yvhi ch &, ,vas nm answar 40
~ ranN ae'er ia, "hi0n S"s q" lev h,, 10 IL
| aldn't imrress mo as much AS tho other -
| O-pieas. reneat il II Won csn As Sir.
| W. have carefully considered the arguments
made by you at our recent interview. or some
thing Of that kind; will not be positive Ms to
the word recent Your assurance that we
| snail be provided Tor IL scarcely specific
| enough In the event''-or I'm case" we
| pursue the course suggested 10y you. we will be
obliged 10 leave the state viii you therefore
state in writing TO whom we shall look for the
| fuinlment OF your promises" Signed. ID. II.
| Weber. James Anderson believe that il II.
Q.-Is your recollection Of il derived from that
| single reading in the hotelf A.-les, sir;
had 1t some time afterward. and may have
| taken q little note OF II.
Q.-were YOU employed in the Treasury De-
! partment AT one time Al was here two
months In 1875. and accepted position during
| that time. Mr.. Bristow was Secretary ol IN,
| Treasury then. don't think the Government
made much by my services had other bust
| ness u attend 70. ! accepted the position he-
cause 1t was offered. and held 1t only for two
| months,
Odd you render any service to the Gov
| ernmrntf A.-Oh. yes sir ala went W
| there very often until got tired OF H. used
| 10 90 IN room with lots of desks in II. where
| did some writing. ! went there almost every
.