The Russellville Democrat., 1878-08-15
lAavertasenssnt.l Another Lie Nailed to the COlln-
 ter

will not tax the patience of the reading public by again noticing the thrice published slander of J. w. TOOmer, but do ask the attention of . candid and impartial public to the bit of new matter which appears in his last card over the signature of w. F. WOoTKN.
 On the 5Gh inst. J. W. Toomcr, after having been closeted for several hours with Joseph w. Pound, and then being fully sensible of the fact that his heart- less attacks upon me were giving me additional strength at home and abroad, and knowing that his slanderOus pub lications were unsupported except by sluices of billingsgatc ena1attng from himself, and that the people here and elsewhere are convinced that I am un- justly assaiIed by villainous wretch, who is moral bankrupt, and stran- ger to honesty and common decency, procured the assistance of J. w. Pound and concluded to accept the prOffered services of kindred spirit in Russell vile to assail me in the public prints, and in furtherance of the plan of att tack J. w. Toomer hurried over to Rus sellville in the eveinng of that day and procured the ''nOte' embodied in Toomer's card over the signature of w. F. Wooten, in which among other things Wo0ten says that in settlement with him ''endorsed a note to Mc- Cracken and himself drawn by L. w. Davis of Russcllvflle and payable to a MT. Swor (hc spells 1t Swaw) which note had been placed in JacOway' $ hands for collection" and again he says "after Jacoway traded us the note he wrote to SwOr that he could not get the money out Of Davis, &c.," And he says "I knew at the time JacOway LET US HAVE THE NOTE THAT IT BELONGED TO SwoR." Now when w. F. WoOten subscribed the above statements HE l KNEW THAT THEY wERE FALSE, and that they arc false and the point outpOur- ings of the wicked and depraved hearts of J. w. TOOmer and w. F. W0etep, submit the following:
 lst. The note above alluded to was never traded to Wooten 6 McCracken, 2nd. Said note was never 'sendorsed' by use or any one else to Wooten and McCrscken, or either of them, nor to al. never s'tradeti" or "endorsed'' q note of any kind to Wo0ten and Nc | Cracken.
 5th. Said note is xow in my posses sion and Inns been CONTINUOUSLY since Feb. 1876. shall hold said note sab. ject to the inspection of any and all gentlemen, who may desire to examine the same that they may see for them selves and know with what malignant hate am followed up by few CUTS whose hate have incurred in the pros ecution of my profession. At the time of the settlement had with w. F. Woot- en, Sept. 10th, 1877, the above s:ete had been barred by the statute Of limitation for more than eight months, and hay. ing received . carte-blanche from MT Swor to "watch my chance and do the best could with the note," got Judge Davis to assume t0 Wooten z McCrackcn the balaAce dnt to them ssnOanting to tl35, they receipt. ed me In full and I credited Judge Da- wis Oa his nOse by the el25. then asl. vised my cllsnt, Mir. Swor, what had done in the premises, and that the pub. lie may know that MF. SwOT endorsed my actions in the premises and that 2 perfect understanding exists between Nr. Swor and myself will here inserl an extract from his letter to me of Jul, II, 1878. It Is ss foll0wss
 s'l will just say to you that am eat
 isned with what you have gone In thu matter. At some future time will tel
 you about . letter received from oI saw from Russellville whose requests did not comply with, they either tho'
 ! was . knavc or fool"
 1 That the public may the more cer- tainiy know that the above statements relative to that note are true and tha the above extract from Swor's letter i' in the exact language of Mir. Swor
 hereby append the certificate of twt gentlemen of known good characteran.
 whose word whi not be qaes.ione,
 where they are known.