New-York tribune., 1878-01-18

ter Papiandrum than poor II is no less than Bishop
Here's the proof In the Summer Of 1879, In yonr own
columns gave extracts from "A Plea for ConcoTh py
Coke who bounded the hunt 80 fiercey three years
ago. But few months afterwards, letter from ths
late Bishop OF Brechin Dr. DGnger opened ms eyes
to his error He then found and manuly acknowl.
edged in pint, that Dr.. Pnsey. the Bishop OF
Brechn and of that school. were not the Roman;
zers that he supposed them be. He had denounced
them furousy for years and all who asreed with ,hs
thcm) traitors, dsloya and what not; bt III that
"Pea for Concord finding that his idea OF them was
false he saws OF them: AT all events now concur
This standpoint reached at last;
argue most hopefully for the future. IA All i
must come together" He goes 20 quote the
conclusion Of the Bishop Of nTecns Letter WIZ ~ real
agree with them, he says they are all :" honest
and men. of different views as to minor matters,
who respect another, and have confidence ID one
another in spite of sucn differences and assert that
and for the suppression aud discori" That is
strong enough for me. 1t is all contend for
BISHOP COXE's RtDICAL LEADERSHIP.
And who Is II that asks for improved arms T. Bishop
Coke again In that letter. in 1875, he laid out
the work for our second century of growth lie did not
conne himself a few accessories Of public worship In
the use the liturgy have Il; but we are to
haye-according to him" rich iurgic developmeDt'
(only think Of TINT horTid word "dcvelopnent!' y
Why. DIR. Newman wrote about Deveopment!) " en-
bodypg all the turgic Of antiquity y and pro-
yding for great variety OF aud solennitics
Over a'u anoVc LIZ 80 % ~, % hos ave- enaJ y t5cSe
terrible vorls-nbitcy hey I'D the modest and guarded
things that have been sugges IL by poo little no How
It IS that few words have called fn'.i such bows
and formidable schenc of Dp Coke ha:
attracted hostile remark It all Ii not ior ne to ex
En who started the two great questions on which Dr.
d. k0veu and The ohcr K!iuasts "tIc dc a,d at i.s
last general cony'T tion-ihr Gsi,tuiin.ai Comnis
SION and the Name QUESTION q WHY. Bstop Coke,
agsiu lie started the lotion 81 c"i,nsslon TO revise
ouF constitution - Whole. II |oait 'h.S lie inaen
f. .
lie suggested mote than fuF years ago II was pro"
ir4rd aud nearly carried IN the general convention %
ia Ihs yra Dr d Koven mad' The greatest speech
se-s!ou ~ favor " M idea ot Bishop Co@e and II
course II proves Bishop Coke 20 be tie leader oi the
Ard " mo started the "NaEo Question! Bishop Coke
convention t. drop the words Protestant EplrOpal"
from all their diocesan legislation; AMI the hist tinc
ever SET pen pncr The subj Ct ia .et-r to
him thai year di.colrasing nm ron 'a.hg So l@d
nossl Aud IL DT. De EoFcn ana two others were the
only oneS this ear vote for Bl.hop yxcs movement
I'm he lower holae. it - my fault The bOys never
askcd NY ycc as 10 whether or no they Should follow
Bishop Coxrs letdcr'li'
Having thus. by uDouc. tionabl, documentary egi-
deuce proved thai BIr CDXc is the had of tie great
Ri,uaiisc "coAspu"ey, l I"jber t"sgtrt thAi your
reasonable hereafter. Oh Losey's d ai. lncre is
"Eawhcad ara ioodvbo9,s" IN ne % p2oarI "Lci Us
have peace" Wishing MI my irofc.tlnt "ppoucnts
!tppy year aE Sercreiv j. IL. HoPKINs.
aMamsporf te .s. Dee; 81 ~; ,, ,,r ,,r
h. indy correction Hy error Gi eit2r y wei) "ss
uuintensi9nA. bad Only ne be'Ig (hHfc@1a" 'eto.e
wnen wrote. Tic ChTrho'@' tat ihe official d9ci-
m,i all through br session, ahd was CulY D. rrird Ia
in ti' House a. "cai Iae p;.so'l pratei in ne
daily We evidently fI"m ne 'rsiih mHnu>c lp II Il
had ~ tie. aud The weekly aerN ard afe. title,
ana the coPcrsht ecuon ~ "aisn ! have never
f.rr, would sccm 10 be that Tao pastoral. ~
aoygd by III , o oiaS' , t %s9 ne T. TT y Ihe soa
tile 81 is the weekly; and that the Presiding
Bishop. aiirr '"' n'i.o nl b',noS "4'irhr 4l,d ms
lougr lt. Will ,rl tirlr ad hoF'ty I"" NfItl'H 10
me cturchno i"rsn c1pi ton. and th't pap'r iats