The New York herald., 1878-02-19
NEW YORK HERALD TUESDAY FEBRoARY 49, sa-TRPLE SHEET
By JudRe Van Worst.

By Judge Van Worst.
othera Motion OF Bostwick dented, without costs
Mutual Life Insurance Company vs. cassn ana
By Judge Lawrence. " ~
Ladd VI. Duriso-Ths report Of referee seems to
mo TO be correct and the motion TO confirm Is is
Eaton vs. Powers.-As the plaintiffs ask TOR
other relief In their notice Of moon II Is within
tho defendants from conveying the property during
tho tendency OF the ACTION As tho property Is not
perishable and s amply sufficient value TO meet the
plaintins claim DO not think that should
be appointed should the trial Of The cause be unrea-
sonably delayed by the defendants leave will bo given
to renew the motion for receiver ordered accord.
Hewitt vs. Dewey The motion for leave 10 Ole
supplemental answer appears to have been most prop
crly denied by tho learned Judge who heard II on both
o. the grounds stated. 40 NOT therclore ee s1as 70
ceedings pending an appeal from TINS order.
Bowcry National Bank vs. Duryea-rhc motion to
the order OF arrest IN this is based upon
the pleading well as upon the afidavits. do not
lnd the complaint aud answer among the papers and
desire counsel 70 supply them as soon as ho oconvon-
Roscoe vs. Loye al III the plaintiff desire to SUBJ
sttutc another attorney her present attorney she
may have an that such substitution be made
payment OF the present attorncy's bill. The bill does
an order for the OF this action It viii
be granted upon payment OF her attorneys Dill and
the taxable costs Of the other parties who have ap
peared and answered In the action.
Julian VS.. Humphrey.-Motion denied, with $40
costs. SEQ memo randum.
SUPREME couRT--c1Rcu1r- 8.
By Judge Van Brunt.
Greene W. Republic Fire Insurance Company
Complaint dismissed Opinion.
French va lngram-Judgment for plaintiff. Opin-
ion. "t r'r
SUPREME coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Lawrence.
Marshall vs.. Robertson.-I under the impress
sion that there was some memorandum 10 the bundle
Carroi place. but IL 90 A' not md i, counssI viii
obge me oy furnishing me with proAt OF such value
hd aisS wn aS entitled
TompklDs VS.. PurceL-The nndings are signed.
an en NOT hs being az
tnat costs should be imposed on dismissal OF the
The Victory Webb, &C.. Man uiaoturing Company
VS.. Beecher and others.-Sec opinion.
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Sanford.
Ludewtg vs. Pariscr.-Tne affidavit and order for the
examination OF defendant should be handed up only
the points OF counsel havo been submitted.
Sawson Watkins ct aL-Motion denied. with $40
costs, out with liberty to renew the same on payment
charged from attachment for the contempt alleged.
Sniln Va Koechling. Order extending time to an
swsr modified by reducing tue time 10 fifteen instead
Corbets W.. De neau-Defendant's examination
costs OF former proceedings-vIz, $I0 unless paid
within i've days tue within order IL vacated
Iona aa ct a. vs. BusscIl e. alwMos,on 70 vacase
within order granted. with $40 costs.
Beams We. Bradley.-Lct an order be entered ap-
pointing defendant receiver OF tho partnership assets
pendente Ito, upon giving bonds IN 81 200 within hve
days Both parties arc enjoIned from receiving SELL
in the meantime In case such bond be not gwen the
plaintif may be- appointed such receiver on giving
Frederick vs. Klein Ct aL-Mouon denied, without
costs.
Lehmarer ct al. VS.. Griswold. d.-Motion denied, with
$40 costs.
Jandon VS. Merram.-Ordef denying defendant's
motion to lie security for costs
Lange Gebe OF al. NO. III Fischer vs. Langc NO.
2l-Order confirming Referees report
Trustees Of smith college vs. Lynch OF al.-Remit-
titur aled. Judgment reversed.
Westerman Remington mo. ll-Order denying
motion.
westerman VS.. Remington (No. 2J.-ordsr dismiss
Foote vs. State homeopathic AsYlum.-Order
granting plaintiff $loo extra allowance, 90
Clark VS.. Buninger r-Order settled
Durant VS. Abendro.h; Humid va o'shea; Hoy
decker vs. Heris Of al Railway vs. GRADER OF al !;
Thompson VS. E'y-Hsasss yy jusss ssax.ss sssrssS;
Buckingham Jr. VS. Ho'alling-Refsrencs or
| dered
COMMON PLEAs--CHAMBERs.
| BY Judge J. +. DAILY.
Ross va Kochler.-Judsmsnt tor plaintiff. See
'Raudal VS.. Caution; Smith vA smi,h.-order
| settled
Arnold va Morris.-If tho defendant, tho assignee,
give the security required by section 1885, the under
taking or deposit, aud deposit whatever balance re-
mains In his hands az security, the motion Will be
granted.
| Eva Schmidt George SchmidI-Report of ref
cree confirmed and divorce granted plaintiff.
McGurley Va. United States Lie Insurance Com
! pany--Proposed case not marked a. required by
| rule 81
Farchild Vs. Brett-0rder must be drawn as a
| Special Term order. 7i
MARINE couRr-sPECIAL TERM.
| By Judge Sheridan.
Kahn vs. spe'dal-ho'ion 70 strike out answer de-
| MED. Opinion.
Fiske vs. Kinney.-Mouon for judgment on demur
HURT VS. The Kendall Biscuit Compan any.-The facts
stated IN Kcndas affidavit would sustain tho defence
proved. rho motto, Is therefore denied. with SIC
costs to abide event The case may be SCI down ioI
February 2 defendant to accept short notice OF trial
Cells vs. Zinke.-Motion to dismiss action, with
costs, and $40 costs OF motion.
Drummond VS.. Collns.-Motion to vacate order o.
| arrest denied.
| Caudee vs. th.-Rcceivcr appointed.
Wetzel VS.. Martens.- Motion granted condition
that security be died and $40 paid and case Sc
| down for Monday. March 4, 1878
| Pinner Davldson.-Reiorrod to Horny K. How
| land, Esq.
Adam VS.. weltry.-Mo,ion to opon default grantee
| on payment Of $l5.
Hyattvs. scars.-Motion to vacate arrest denied
| Logomasni vs. Biggo.-I think undertaking shoult
bc Joint and several; new undertaking may be niet
nunc pro tune; no costs.
Cyrus VS.. Portmann; NcEwon VS. Sump; AndontoI
VS.. GrIswold; Donney vs. Wilson Hyatt vs. Sears =
| Motions granted. Phippanny VS.. .Richards.-Motton
grained. Action revived and continued
| BY Judgo McAdam.
Hcaly vs. Back.-Caso settled and fled.
OYER AND TERMINER.
| Before Judge Davis
| BABBIrT's ALLEGED EMDEzzLINo CASHIER
Thomas X Lewis who was tor a long time in th,