National Republican., 1878-01-16
SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT.

Applcby ". Winston. In this ca'ca q trustee sp-
pointed under decree Of the court having sold
certain real estate free Of all tuXGs and assess
mcnts chargenble thereon. and having been pre-
s-ntcd by the purchaser with a certain assessment
for special improvements which assessment. IN the
opinion Uf the trustee. was void on IT. lace, the
trustee declined to pay the assessment on the
ground llIlt II constituted no charge upon the
property and referred the matter 10 the Court In
special Term for decision. Tho court sustained
the view Of the trustee and ordered him to with
hold payment. From this order the purchaser ap-
pcaiel to the General Term. submitted MeS,rs.
t,oricn and MaIiingy for pniruh, aud Mr.. John
Rit,cnousc vs.. baltimore and Potomac Rail.
road Company. This was an acton 70 re-.
cover the value Of the buiidngs which
morc and Potomac Railroad depot. The build.
ings consisted Of stable and uut.hui.CS, and the
company tore th"n down. The verdict iclow was
lrglIcy and DuvUll for rl,intii+ and Ncssrs.
Wo,thingtou and Head for defendant.
Wupi ". Woud ErmanIe,l t"the Equity Court,
Il hring claimed TINT new and important evidence
Hcnucll vs. M,Caulcy. Motion to dismiss ap.
iIa.rIs V. johnson Motion t. dismls> appeal.
stafford u Cnrk vs.. Brown. Mandate from the
United states supreme court filed.
bartlett Il Rubbi' " uDNpNr,i. Mandate from the
. United state, supreme cant file
John Dixon ". }. f. y. WIikin@n. The p9lntii
claim, To- be owner a lot on which frame house
NJ TU3 street uyFlhwcst stands, and the defend
ant owns the lot adjoining. On January |. 1873 the
latter entered upon hi lot. dug ont and removed
/ the earth which sustained the Foundations nf the
Plaintiffs hnllsr, Ia q careless aud negligent man
uur. by reason Of which the foundation Of plain
/ tiii'S housc gave way and the idle drpped down,
cracking and iniuging tie walls ~ the cNtcnt Of
SjB. IN the Circuit Court III" jury TcilrncdR II YER
| diet Of $50 dHmUgcs. Thy ease came up Oh cXcSl',
lions: Argued hy Gcn'rI lienEle for plaintiff
! Adjourned untl ten u. IN. to-day.
PROBATE CoURT-REGIsrER WEBSTER.
! IN n {. Gtc ufJabcE Harlow. deceased; on petition
uI Charles u. Gilmore. creditor. ni order pt pub
| licati0n was Issued. IN r. estate Of Louis ncverS
DECIDED exceptions tD account Of administrator
fled by George Dcvcrs ct al. IN r. estate of Adam
Gasbiis. deceased: Adam Gadds, jr., was apl'Outcd
! administration Of said estate and gave bond In
sl6IbO Last viii and testament Of Christopher
| Molcs deceased: he leaves everything u his wife
I amer The settlement Of his dcbts: Justice MarAT:
! thur BhS>cd several execution administrator, and
guar iHns account, which wc!c presented by the
Register. Adjourned until eleven u. M. I" day.
DISTRICT CoURT-JUsrICE HUMPHREYS.
/ IN r. Wake ". schooner Znc. The claim Of the
/ !belanl was l'Ir natn,sGl and jih, amounting tc
| ssI7 ~. furnished ut Baltimore and never settled
lnr. Decree ul the count ordering payment Of the
claim,
EQUITY CoURT-IrsTICE wyLTE.
Robinson vs. Wall. decree. slaum vs.. Morscll
7 auditor report ratified. Adjourned until Sntur
day next AZ eleven q. III.
CRIMINAL COURr-JrsTfCE MARTHUR.
I The trial Of Amy and Mary Glnscuc indicted fJi
the numbering Of tao infant child Of the latter, by
f smpthuriHg. wa continued yesterday. The cv
In argument N,..F.. NUJb and Willard addressing
the jury In bChu.iut TIE dcicmdVIts, aud District
Attorney Wells "pruirg and summing up for the
Government
The argument. we're concluded at hafpast three
""'urk. ll' llnN'r delivered II BRIEF charge, say
rg that il was mny' uI question OF h,t for them
10 consider rather than involving any intrIcNCics o
law
The Jury retired at 4 quarter to four o'clock aud
returned lrw minute. Utter four with verdict .
uC pltal. The pri.y9,r. were Discharged and fu
sular time wcgv EtTi busy receiving the cOngiRtu
sHt,"nS II the T numerous friends.
SUITS ENTERED.
EguEy sJr.-R : RubnCam vs. NJ Rubmcam 9
nl.; iur ulc and partition. Mary l.. Sn"ls ". f. II
Smi,h ct al. buurd " director uf the National Cup
iHl Heal E,IUtU As>u" ulipn Ut Washington. D. Z.
Cr account H. X CnIt W. &. I. Davis Ct al. fu
restraining order and sale Of lot ~. GcOrgc Mon
der vs.. Ant N Gcicr; tor specific performance Tn
Metropolis savings Bank vs.. b. II, Tracy ct a.
judgments creditors bill.
LI'r sid"-E. \. cluruUgh ind George L. CRUZ "
Christian WOi.h on bill Of exchange. +. A. Ga
baugh and GcOIg. I. Gruh vs.. James Pierce: OI
bill of exchange Joseph BeckhRus VI. Ruber
CnIt, lr., Oh Holes Jsmcs ManOguc vs.. Jushu
Richie ct al; on nOes. John SChlegel vs Brown
vs. Jumcs Kelly. on note. William II. Graham
Go. ". A. J. Keller: Oh note. Baum BrUs vs. i
Sill crbcrg: Oh note. The Metropolis Saving
Bnuk W. II. N. Dcllinler ct al; on note. liollerlac
( DilieuhaCh vs. john Golden: on account. T.. I
EmUre ~. +. Y. Parker; OF note. Charles Schle
imger v. II Nj. rimkmrd on note. J. " Walsh v
W T.. Walsh M appeal from magistrate. Til
! Trustees Of the Louise Home vs.. franklin Rives
on balance of note. A. SAks X Co. vs.. J. T. ROdger'
on note. :. e, Mcdowell vs.. Dennis GleNsOni o
account. ThrCiti1cns National Bank Of Washing
ton city Vs. 4. \. II smer ct al on note, The CIT
d zcu> National Bank of Washington city VS. II. !
snow ct all on note, two suits same vs.. August
Davis ct al; on Hutc.