The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-04-24

would IN my judgment. DO exceedingly inpolitle 70
reopen the question"
JANIS A. McKrSzrE, dem, Of Ky. oppossd:-.Asst
present advised would not vote for tho bill. IL 10
unwse 70 bring IL forth and u will not add jot %
title TO the common good OF the people"
WILLIAM MCKINLEY. Jr., rep.) OF Ohio. 10 opposed
10 The bill lie does dispute the right OF the
House TO refer dispose of the resolutions bus 70
entertain such proposition at this time, with vsu
to stirring up the passions ana prcjudces Of the peo
plc 10. no says simply infamous.
LYME S. MErcALv. irep.l OF s.:-sT shall vou
against TN bill, ofcourss, tho ground that 90 NOS
think the agitation OF tho question will DO the people
and tho country any good the contrary 10 would
DO damaging"
ROGER Q. MILLS, (dem.) Of Texas, opposed,-sW
has element or good commend Il now or here.
alter Put oown against IT, and do all in your
power TO put the agitation down also.'
JonS ]. MITCHELL. (rep) ofPa Is opposed 70 M, and
didn't know who thcro could be that in favor Of
JAMES MONROE, (rcp) OF Ohio, viii vote against the
bill Ho opposed to tho agitation OF the question:
az II is breach Of the peace OF the country.
CHARLES IL MORGAN, (dem.) OF Mo-, opposed :-"I
am against the bill uuequivocaly and most omphaGi
cally shall vote against and discourage It's agisa
tion"
LEOPOLD Morse, (dcm. OF Mass, opposed:-"I am
Presidency. do not want to hear tho subject men.
toned again. What do want is peace and quiet"
II. L. MULpRow, (dom) OF Miss, says IL Is almost the
universal sentiment Of tho South 10 let the thing
alone" Ao says;-"Whiie the people sherc do not
believe that Mr.. Hayes got the vote Of tho people,
think bad policy TO disturb tho by any fur
Their agitation Of the qucston."
HENRY S. NEAL, (rcp.) OF Ohio, opposed :-"I think
tho subject has becn settled by tho Commission and
fhal Hav Ia Ia tlv n mir rhahla -
AMAsA NoRcRoss, (rep.) OF Mass.. oppossd:-"i do
not know that anything In the act estabishing the
Electoral Commission cvos authority 10 Congress 10
declare the right, II exists, to test in the courts
tho validity OF Mr.. Hayes tito."
ADDISON OLIVER, (rop.) OF lows, opposed:-aNo.
neither Is there any probability any possibility Of
the question coming before the House. II there vas
perhaps decent way OF setting aside the election Ne
might DO induced to Give It moments' considers
tion."
CHARLES O'NElLI, (rep OF Pa, opposed :-..Havinx
never questioned legality OF M. Hayss election
nm not In favor Of sIlswing tho qucsGoa 10 - ~
| opcnc6."
| EDWARD ovERroS. Jr, trcp.) Of Pa, opposed:--.I
don't about II; don't think about H. and don's
| know anything about It."
GEORGE W. PATTERSON, trop) of N. r., 10 warmly
opposed to tho bill. he says'l supposed IL all
CANNON. Both OF tho candidates for tho Presidency
| were bad enough. Tho Lord delivcr from an
experience with tho other after trial of this me-"
| THOMAS B. PEDDIE, (rcp.) Of N. j., oppossd-"Is
would be further OF limo TO undertake TO bring
the question before tho country. II Is weak invcn.
| tisn Of the enemy"
| HENRY n. PoLLARD (rep) OF Mo. :-'T do NOT think
tho matter ought 10 BIO stirred up. Hayes tito be-
| licvo to be perfectly good"
| THAD c. PovSD, lrep) OF Wis.,, says:-'You can
wro down opposed 10 tho bill any other that
/ mi 0dicaf hO lair I hny0 no tookt n
/ LLEwELLYS Powers, trcp) OF Me:-"ls 10 all .
damned piece or folly and outrage upon tho
try. OF course am opposed 10 all efforts TO reopen
| the Presidential question"
HIRAM PRICE, (rep) OF Iowa, Ia opposed tho bill:
"The contemptiblo nuisance that could be
pressed into political measure, and shat too. the on
spring OF democratic brain. II Is evident that the
purpose 10 to manufacture political capital II cann
| DO donc with the consent Of my vote"
| JosEpn II. RAxEy, (rcp.) OF y. c. opposed :-"I an
| always IN favor Of letting we'll enough alone"
| JAMss d. RANDOLPH, (rsp.l Of Tenn, oppossd:--
"rhcss might BE- contingency n when wssld
support such bin. Believing however, IN shs psr.
pcsui,y Of the republican party, would NOT shss
| time encourage u 10 commit suicide. do nos Az.
| gcther approve OF this war ON Hsyos.n
DAVID REA. (dem.) OF No., oppossd:-sA sun b.
tween Tilden and Hayes would unsetsis the country,
PROSTATE business depress industries Increase
hard times and XIII any party that would pus such an
| unnecessary yoke upon the people. AZ q friend OF
tho democratic party, don't propose support the
bill, and glad to know that the party thinks %
by worry largo majority"
JouS Il. REAGAN, (dem.) Of Texas. opposed :-"n q
| as crazy scheme could we'll 30 conceived. II 10
tho sublime height OF political nonsense. II is-
we'll, that Is enough, think"
| THOMAS b. REED, trcp) OF Me-, opposed:-sT
have not given tho subject serious thought because
| IL is not worth IT.
| JAMES b REILLY, tdcm) OF Pa, holds the measure
| In supreme contompt and regards Il 40 utterly I'm
practicable and proposition that II offensive IN the
nostrs OF tho people, Yet no might for sne bill
/ n WINS proposed as Q partisan matter.
Amggicus v. RICE tdcm.) of Ohio, doesn's believe u
| win amount anything THIS Is much a. he would
say about the matter except that is q proposition
/ he cannot defend.
wILuAn w. RICE, (rcp.) or MASS, opposed .-"Is
might DO desirable for the republicans 70 have the
democrats insist upon the agitation, but have no
use for tho folly IL likely to tormcns W very
| much"
| HAYWOOD Y. RIDDLE. (dom.) OF Tenn, oppossd:--
at would DO a OF time, and what would Il prons
to reopen tho question this juncture In our posi
cal aairs2 II would not do particle OF good thas
| can discover"
/ WILLIAM N. RonBrss tdcm.) OF N. G., pronoupccs
| tho bill a humbug Tncso IL nothing In 10 and 10
ought die IN tho committee. Ito Is opposed TO the
measure and thinks ~ will novcr again DO heard
| from.
| CHARLES u. RoBERrs, DOM OF Nd, opposed
i 81 was q Gbbustcr and did ell could 70 beat
Hayes, but I viii never voto for she bill ssspsn
the question IL Is dcad and lot 10 remain
| Is"
GEORGE u. ROBINSON, trcp) Of Mass. oppossd:--sT
assured that the lending democrats arc against IT.
| ind m would DO dangerous experiment for them -
. party 20 attempt TO revive u at this timc"
MILTON ;. KorrSsos, trcp.) OF Ind. opposed
"why, should think you could SEQ that fact wri,scn
| all over my iacc II that what yoa call HERALD
| conundrums Please cay am cmphaticaily against
4 IT.
MILES Ross, tdcm.) Of N. j., opposed:-"I have had
| enough OF tho Presidential rnmpus for the present
81 ma Nav Iersev- hna oycry hodx La Ia aiona.