The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-02-17
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CdaMBERs.
by Judge Donohuc.

by Judge Douohuc. toaa
st. John vs.. St John and others; New York Lie
insurance Company vs.. Lassettc Il ~ ~ -Grauted.
In the matter OF Peterson, &c SEQ rule.
Paine, &C., W.. Bsrnum. -Memorsndum.
Brewster vs. McGuirc.-Motiou granted, with costs.
McGinns kandUiph.--On the papers there IL
nothing 70 uphold an allowance.
Farmers Protective Union vs.. Shepard NO order
can be made 10 pay over; II the plaintiff dssires ne
may have a receiver aud test the claim.
karsten vs.. Mott-No referee VIII he appointed 10
take testimony In chcf In the 0rst instance the
der must be returnabIc at chambers.
MARITIME W. Lowensten.- In this tho answer OF
the uecndant In the SUIT AZ 10 excessive Ices was
amended, setting up the rcaxation by Mr. JARVIS AZ
long ago as 1870 The motion, there orc. should bs
denied on account Of delay III mnkugit
by Judge DAVIS.
Devoe vs.. Dev0e. Order signed.
sUPEsIoR CoURr-spECIAL TERM.
By Judge Sanford.
Picrson, Jr. vs. Partridge ct aL--Referec's report
confrmeJ, und oruer Tor judgment OF surplus.
W.demeyer vs.. Wcdenieyer. --Rcierces report con.
Armed ana judgment ordered accordingly
Jaudon vs. MerraD.-Motion denied, with $40 costs.
Bryan VS.. Bryan ct a.-Rcport confirmed aud judg.
me mt OF foreclosure and sale ordered.
Lawson vs.. Consolidated Fruit Jar Company
Order allowing defendant to sorve amended answer.
The New YORK Iron Nine 70 Wetmore; Same va
Same. Order granted. Bond and dcrtaking APP
proved.
TAFT vs. seaeer ct ai.-Order amending judgment
roll
Jesescn VS.. Frank ct al--ordsr granted ard uu.
dcrta king approved
CIarA W. Bininger Motion granted
East RIVER Sa,Iunal Bank vs.. fiilon OF al.-Ordered
on day culopdar Tor March l.
Valentine VS.. New York Central Railroad Com
pany -order vacating Judgment, with $40 costs
Gross 1t NJ Schicsiuger, Boiler vs. ochlesinger:
Tnrz Ncnois; Perry va Volkinning; Clark vs..
Binnngcr; Maxwell vs. German American National
BANK; Rupert vs.. Daviuson; Borcel v0. Thompson /;
Rullodge VS.. The Mayor. &c. Mccxer ct al. Eyer.
ton OF al; Goldsmith vs. Marcshn ct al Ki.an vs..
Scbottc; Prentice vs.. knickerbockcr Lie Insurance
Company hils vs. Hepburn Ell al Valentine va New
YORK Central Railroad Company; Birncy VA 10
Count --Uraers grained.
COMMON pfrAa-
Before Judge Robinson.
vogel ana another vs. Reynolds: Dovalc IS Lewisi
Bell W. Conner; Dawson vs. Hamilton, Valentine VI
VaeDtlno.-Bond approved.
Aarens VI. DISQUALIFICATION granted.
Kehrman vs. Ab0ott-Amount liked Tor bond
In the matter Of GIsk ins.-Motion granted.
Moore vs. Gould fax .ton.
DrsAscI w. -InJunction continued.
In the matter OF the dual accounting ot kioin.-Do-
cree signed.
Inc People ex rel Morris Vs. R,nda;L-Sarety ap-
proved
DEDUCTION OF S2l7 ~ from Dili as taxed
Downs VS. baftett-Motion 70 vacate order OF
rest dcnied, with $40 costs 10 abide the event Mem-
Uranium
Lection Va. The Atlantic Mutsai Insurance Com
pany --Considering tho great labor that will be
posed on this Court aud the equitable csims OF tho
plaintiff 10 the consideration oil mo Court vi Appeals
IN some respects mentioned, the motion Is granted
payment OF costs tsi0j OF opposition
MAXINE couHT-- CHAMBERS.
BY Judge Sheridan.
Swift vs.. Snow; Moral ". Cohcw; Lauterbach vs..
Heron -Motions granted
ciemen, vs.. Bowne.-Urder granted amending pro-
ccedings
stoiiweck VS.. Hipck.--Mo,ious two motons) TO dis
miss Tor want oI jurisdiction granted unless paintin
puts Cause calendar wtuD six DAYS anu pays COSTS.
Weber vs.. Grote.-Receiver appointed.
Winter vs.. Bremmcfm'n smith VS.. wMucke;
Jackson VS.. Lergc; Geouot vs. Mason; lcttzbach va
Aberie; Doun.iiy vs. Wilson, woii va Foley; jack
sou VS.. Huchcock Orders granted