The state rights democrat. [volume] (Albany, Linn County, Oregon) 1865-1900, 1878-03-08
asar. pes1st.

ready been docketed for the term Of Circuit
Court which eonvenes next Monday
No. III. Thompson & Son vs J. r. Her
rem. Action TO recover damages
7Thos. Monteith W. C. P Burkhart
Action to recover damages.
3-A. ?. Hotailins / Co. vs J. R. Herfen
ct al Injunction.
Evinssnt Watson vs. W. ]. Smith ct al
Suit in equity.
5-Board Of School Land Commissioners
vs.. jas. hegoning ct al Injunction.
81. +. Hendrix vs. Henristta B. Gore ct
al Snit to foreclose mortgage.
TT E. Parker vs. J. B. Crossen ct al
s-wm. Gird vs.. o. 3 c. R. R. Co Suit
to ascertain title.
&c. w. Houok vs.. o. &C. RR Co
Suit to ascertain title.
l0-Benj Brenner vs. Alexander Moore ct
al Suit to set aside deed
ll-Jesse B Irvine " City Of Scio. Writ
of review.
l2-Henry Lessing vs. Jac Fleischner.
Action to recover money
l3-Liun county vs. J. A. Brown. Action
to recover money. frri IS
Al. W. Johnson ct al VS. Viola johnson.
Suit for partition.
I5-Duncan Monteith ct al vz Thos. Mon
teith Suit for partition. @
I6-W. h D0dd vs. @. W. Dawson. Suit
to foreclose mortgage.
l7-Andrew Rickard Va Wm Montgomery
Suit to ascertain title. IA
ls-Andrew McCalley ct ux ys Robt. A
Irvine. Suit to recover dOwer. ~
l9-Same vs. The Albany Farmers Co.
Suit 70 recover dover.
20-same vs. A. H. Baltimore. Suit to
recover dover.
2i-Same vs. Jas Elkins. Suit to recover
dover
22.sAme vs. B. ". cundia Suit to no
cover d0wer. H ss
as-sans vs. Philip Baltimore. Suit to re-
24ESams vs. Eli and Ed r III carter
Suit to recover dover 10 80 =
2J-Same Is R. G. Hill Suit to recover
dover
26-saas rs John h. Burkhart. Suit to
recover dover -
Same Va Geo. F. Simpson.
2S-Same vs. Elizabeth Ritter
29-Same vs. Sophia Brzger. r,
S0-Same VS. J. L Hill
3l-Catharine Breeden VS. A. R. Breeisn.
Divorce.
S2-H H. Baxter vs. Ada NJ. Baxter.
sgJas. B. Houston rs Mary E. Houston.
sTFFancis E. PhippA vs William .Phipp..
Divorce.
s5-Jossie F. Sullivan vs. Jnos ". Sullivan.
Divorce s So
s6-susaa A. Pickernell rs John E. Pick.
ernen Divorce.
S7-W. B. Henderson vs. Mary B. Hender-
ss-NInerva Cooper vs. Columbus Cooper.
Divorce
ss-ElsanOr soraffOrd rs James scraford.
Divoree.f --,.s
4o-Martha Allen Us Benton Allen. Di-
vorce
A-ohn Mckinney vs. Jas. Edwards ct al.
Suit 70 foreclose mortgage
42-Benj. Brenner vs Marcena Moore ct al
Suit to foreclese mortgage
43-Frank D. Wood vs. Dayton Simisen ct
al. Suit to fereclose mortgage
A-Same vs. same Suit to foreelose mort
45@ehn Mckinney rs Thos. S. Summers
Action to recover real property
46-A Parrish ct al vs. T. 5. Summers
Suit for partition.
47-Eh Wyatt VS. John Mansfield Suit
to referm deed
4S-Jas. B. Houston vs. Chas, Cunningham.
Suit for partition.
ar n. Price, adm'r, VS. J. F. Thompson.
Suit to set aside fraudulent conveyance.
50-Wm. ]. Thompson ct al VS. Jas. F.
Thompson. Suit for partition
5l-I. Goldsmith & Co VS. Irvine & Morris
Action to recover money.
52-Wm. Bennett vs. J. NJ South Action
TO recover money.
ST p Dinwiddie vs. VIM H. Rsdford
Action to recover money.
5HJessie Turner vs. Peter A. Moses ct al +
Action on Judgment.
55-FFank Bros & Co. vs. B. A Crimes. /
Action to recover specific personal property.
j6-L. Graf Bro vs. Jacob Fleischner i
Action to recover money
57-Wm- Bennett vs. H. A. Holman ct al
Action to recover money
5S-John Sylvester vs. James R. Herren.
Action to recover damages
59-Martin Hebron vs. James R. Herren
Action to recover specific personal sproperty.
60-Frank Bros Co vs. Levi Douglas.
Action to recover specific personal property.
6l-frank Bros & Co. VI j. s. Grimes.
Action to recover money.
62-ohn A. Crawford vs. Mathews & Nor
rison. Action TO recover money
63-J. 4. Morrison vs. Jas. R Herren
ct al Action to recover money.
64-Andrew Wiley, Admir-, vs. John D. /
Glass ct ux. Confirmation of sale
65-Jas. Holt ct al w Malvina J. Hayes.
Confirmation Of Sale
66-Irvfne & Norris Ys R. l. Gilehrist. |
Confirmation Of sale.
67-A- @. Hanseman vs. Koontz & Cooper.
Appeal
6s-Mose. Parker vs. State of Oregon.
Writ Of review
69-Andrew McCallew ct ux " J. R. Bal
timere. Suit to receiver dover.
70-Eliza Denny VS. Robt Renline Action |
to recover money.
7l-Chester Keensy ct al VS. Elizabeth C. |
KeeAey ct al. Suit for partition
72-D- l. E Lnper vs. Martin LuPer. |
Divorce
ennnuhinL