Daily Los Angeles herald., 1878-08-06
COURT REPORTS.

AOdUSI IEhm -IhlAI CALENDAh.
MONDAY, August 5, 1878.
Skinner VS.. Howe-Set for trial
August Goth, at 10A. NJ.
J. x. Skinner vs.. Ellen McGee-
Passed.
Linton vs. Lichtenberger-Set
for trial Sept. 5th.
Oxarart vs.. e. GARNER Passed
informally.
De la Osa ct al vs.. GARNER ct oil.
Set for September %.
Oge Va. Bramwell-Set for Sep
tember 18th.
Francis VS.. Eachus-Set fur Au.
gust 30th.
Brown vs. G. p. r. r. Co.-Set
for Septem Der 4th.
Gildmaoher vs.. Kochs-Set for
August 10Th.
Porter ct al. vs.. NJ. Kruuer-Set
for September 18th.
Chick va. w. s. MaXwell-Sat
for August 18th.
Pico ct al. VS.. Hancock-Set for
September 81.
Sebastiana ct al. vs. Co.year ct
ai. .-OCt lol OGioUtT tlIl.
Oxarart VS.. Hewitt ct al.-S Set for
August l4th.
Avis ct al. W. Kalisher etai.-
Set for August 14th.
Eangenlier vs.. Patrick Nj ran
Set for August 10th.
Thistlewaite vs.. Tnyior ct al
Set for September 81.
T.nnp hnpgp,n ~ r,,r
September I'd.
Baker VS.. 5. p. r. r. Cn.--Set
for September 4th.
Sanchez VS.. Cumminga-sset for
September 10th.
Githin vs.. Walker-Set for
September Goth.
De Temple VS.. aldwin-Set for
Sertenber 23l.
Carey vs.. White-Set for Sep
tember 81.
Wolfenstein vs. Wagner-Set for
September 2l.
House cr al. VS.. Cabot-Set for
September 9th.
j. w. Cate vs.. E. M. Sanford ct
submitted.
Grandin vs. Sanford ct al.-Same
action.
Garrett Lynch W.. Sanford ct al.
Same action.
l.. A. Co. Bank VS.. Land CO Ope-
rative Nursery and Fruit Company
of Los Angeles-Demurrer over
ruled; ten days to answer.
Macarthur vs. Fnrris-Motion for
new trial denied; ten days stay.
Butter w. Beach--Sane action.
Wilkinson VS.. Merrill-Findings
and Judgment for defendant; ten
days stay.
Mace VS.. Merrill-Same action.
Camille GARNER VS. Eugene Gar
nier-Findings and judgment for
plaintiff; ten days stay.
Wakefield VS.. BoutOn-Findings
and judgment for defendant, Mar
gareL Bouton; ten days stay.
l.. A. City VS.. Beaudry-Find.
ings and judgment for defendant;
ten days stay.
Dickn II vs. IIazarl-Samc ac-
tioD.
Vassalo vs. Amillo-Judgment
for plaintiff; ten days stay.
Glllore vs.. Il. Jeff White ct al
Demurrer submitted; two days to
Gle points.
Gilmore VS.. Tiffany et al. Same
action.
Nadeau vs.. West-Sama action.
tVoodworth ct al VS.. StreIitz-
Same action.
Reed vs.. White-Same action.
Ernst W. Cummings-Same ac-
tion.
Commercial Bank vs. Gelcich-
Same action.
Lothian & Co. VS. Pico-Same ac-
tioD.
Morris W.. pico-Same action.
Nichols va. Burnap-Same uc-
ton.
Meinzer vs.. Pico ct al--Same ac-
tion.
Long vs. Miller-Same action.
Bot vs.. Vignon-Demurrer sub,
two days to file points. Set
for August 18th.
Rowland vs. Vignon ct AIS ,me
action.
West VS.. Cole-Motiun for new
trial denied; exceptions filed.
BorigDo vs. acknowledgements
submitted; two days to file points.
Haines vs.. White-Same action.
Irvine vs. Kremer Demurrer
overfuled.
Seven cases VS.. Temple-Demur-
rer submitted; two days to file
points.
Lanterman VS.. Williams-Hear-
ing of statement for settlement at
9 A. NJ. to- morrow.
Long, Assignee, vs.. Berry-Ton
days further time to answer.
Anguisola VS. Doster ct alien
days further stay.
Lee VS.. Richards-Demurrer sub
mitted; two days to file points.
Long VS. Kalisher - Good cause
being shown, the judgment here
tofore ordered to enter, Is modified
so as to conform to the findings.
Carrillo vs. McPhillips-Demur-
rer set for argument at 9 A. NJ. to-
morrow.
Lacey VS. Beaudry-Motion for
new trial by defendant overruled.
Thistewaite vs. Taylor-Motion
to increase bond on information
submitted.
Hughes vs. Hazard Demurrer
submitted; two days to file point.
Kraszyrski VS. Newhall-Hear-
ing on order to show cause why
plaintiff herein should not be pun
ished for contempt for re-entaring
upon the land in question. Taken
under advisement.
COrnty tOure....... ..STEPHENS, j.