The Portland daily press. [volume] (Portland, Me.) 1862-1921, 1878-07-24

Western District july LGU Term.
HoN. JOHN APPLETON. Chief Justice, presiding;
HoNs. CHARLES W. WALTON, JONATHAN e.
DIcKERsoN, WILLIAM G. BARRows, WILLIAM
WRIT vIRGIs, ARTEMAs LIDBEY, Associate Jus.
tees.
j. d. Pulsifer. Esq, Reporter; Daniel W. Fessen-
den, CLERK.
TUESDAY, July 49,
ANDRosooGGlN CASE.
No. 6s-Josbua Hopkins VS.. Patrick McGilicnddy.
The action was for malicious prosecution, and the
Hopkins says that April "a, 1875, he was in the
employ of defendant and collected Of Eard for him
$3.50; that he proposed to defendant to turn over
500, to have sthe $3.50 credited to Elard and $50
were made on the books and transaction settled
McGillicuddy changed his mind, was unwilling to
aliew the $50 on account, demanded it back, and
on being refused, had him arrested and tried for
larceny, of which he was acquitted.
Defendant says be did give credit for $3.50 at The
time and took the money and counted it, found it
fell short, and plaintiff refused to pay over ex-
plain, and that was the reason of the prosecution
The verdict was for the plaintiff and the defendant
moved to get aside and filed exceptions.
Frye argued in support of exceptions
Hutchinson, contra.
CUMBERLAND CASES.
No. 136-EdwaId b. James ve. Charles Grohsaith
Dismissed.
B. d. verrill for plaintiff
Sweat q Coombs for defendant.
No. 1si-Everett Chadbourne VS.. John Goodel.
writing 60, 60. 30.
Mattocks for plaintiff.
Drummond g. Winsbip for defendant.
No. 1s5-Patric X. McDonough VS. George Webster.
Bradbury for plaintiff.
winship for defendant.
40. I90-Cheser d. Small VS.. Chester G. Robinson.
Iiting so, so, 80.
70. 1ss-Townsend National Bank VS.. James N.
usow 81 tr. Exceptions oveTruled.
bradbury for plaintiff.
Strout & Holmes for trustee.
Mattocks for principal diff.
o. 1s9-Charles P. Babcock VS.. John M. Strout
Sustee. Exceptions overraed.
,ank for plaintiff.
Peabody for principal defendant
Waterman tor trnstee.
2Oc-George Mcyain VS.. Ernesto Ponce. Mo.
ioverruled.
otley q Sylvester. Frank.
}. 2O3-Simon Rindskopf ct ais. vs. Josiah Bur
lea ct al. Exceptions oyerrued.
ID. Verrill for plaintiff
Cleaves & C,eaves for defendant.
o. 2O5-Ida A. Proctor VS.. Gardiner NJ. Parker Ell
Motion overruled.
rocier Tor plaintiff:
w. W. Thomas for defendant.
10. 2Oe-Daniel W. ScribDer VS.. John o. Winship
fception and motion overrued.
10. 201-Same VS.. Frank W. True. Same entry.
No. 20s-Horatio Staples, applt, VS.. Michael Nc
bnald. Goods sold and delivered. Defense-Wrou.
an sued. Wife or daughter responsible, not l. Ii
Ito wife. Verdict for plaintiff Motion TO SCI
side.
Cobb for defendant argued in ssupI ort of motion.
Metcalf. contra.
No. 209-Melnd. II. Pettin5ill vs.. S. Z. Abrams
lotion oveIIuled
Cobb tor plaintiff Swasey s. Son for defendant.
No. 21O-David w. Merrill VS.. L. t. Goddard. Elk
options overIuled.
Dow for plaintiff
Haskell g. Wing for defendant.
No. 2l1-Hall.vs Hu ~ner & trustee. Exception
Uerrued.s
Frank for plaintiff. Gerry, Jr., for defendant
No. 2I2-Keiler vs.. cIbbets. Dismissed
Perry for plat tiff. Hale for defendant.
No.23-Fauineton VS.. Hooier. Exceptions ove
ruled
Locke loT plaintif.
Strout 6 Gage for defendant
NJ. 2l7-Donnell vs.. Emery Dismissed,
Sargent, Stout & Holmes fol plaintiff
No. 22t-Jobn Cunkley VS.. Boston x Maine RAJ
road. To be submitted on brief.
C,eaves & H, W. Swa'ey for plaintiff.
Putnam tor defendant
NO. 222-Deane vs.lDeaue. Exceptions oyerrule
Strout 81 Gage for plaintiff.
Cobb for defendant,