St. Johnsbury Caledonian. [volume] (St. Johnsbury, Vt.) 1867-1919, 1878-07-19

24l. Electa T.. bOOCn VS.. w m. BOOtn.
Intolerable severity.
257. Jane H. Bacon VS.. Jerome C.
Bacon. DesertiOn.
26O. Mary Jane Masten vs.. w. s.
Masten. Refusal to support $400 al
imOny.
TRIALS BY JURY.
No. 6. Tillotson VS.. Ramsay. Deft's
verdict. Exceptions.
No z. Danville VS.. Sheffield. Deft's
verdict.
%. John F. Moore VS.. c. C. Harvey.
Jury disagreed.
81. F. D. Williams VS.. L. F. Ed
wards. Verdict for plff. for $I7.12.
SO. Fire Association VS.. Merchants
National Bank. Deft's verdict. Ex-
captions, and motion for new trial. Con-
tinued on motion.
"a. Joseph Farrar VS.. Horatio Ran
kin. Deft's verdict.
40. Galusha Bundy VS.. Luke Buzz
zell. Deft's verdict. Exceptions.
GA. VIM. Human VS.. James H.
Folger. Verdict for plff. and deft.
Is. j. C. Whitcher VS.. town of
Peacham. Verdict for deft. Exceptions,
and motion for new trial.
60. Simeon Huse VS.. w. Fl. Preston.
Verdict for plff. 1910. Exceptions.
70. National Bank of Lyndon VS..
Shattuck's estate. Verdict for def.
Judgment pro .forma for deft. Excep-
tions.
81. C. and E. Gates VS.. Harvey
Morse. Verdict for deft. Exceptions.
81. l. H. McClary, Ex'r VS.. H. B.
Graham. Verdict for plff. Exceptions.
State VS.. James Hinch. Verdict not
guilty.
State VS.. Eastman, Goochee and Bean.
Verdict guilty of grand larceny.
State VS.. Mike Gerry. Verdict guilty
of arson.
State VS.. O'Clair and Bishop. Guilty
of burglary.
State VS.. Oderkirk and Smith. Guilty
of grand larceny.
CASES DISPOSED OF BY COURT.
1. Asa NJ. Woodbury. VS.. Wood
bury's estate. Judgment for plff.
9. Hopkins VS.. Weeks. Judgment
for plff. on report.
IL. Hall VS.. Hale and Bryant and
I.,I fNr 70,
costs.
Is. Lumber Co. VS.. Orne. One cen
damages and no costs.
81. Thomas and wife vs. Stannard
Motion for new trial denied. Excep
tions.
"a. Morse VS.. Grand Trunk Railroad
Nonsuit.
90. Webb VS.. American Box g. Hon,
Co. For plff. Clerk to assess.
Sc. French VS.. Perry. On report TO
deft.
81. Holland VS.. Grays. Judgmen
for $3.50 for plff.
SO. Way, Titus & Co. VS.. PhilbroOk
Discontinued by bankruptcy.
81. Wilson Sewing Machine Co. VS.
GoOdall. Judgment for plff. for 800
and costs, by agreement.
SIS. Newell VS.. Colby, Gay & Blake
Heard by court. Damages for plff,
| S199.17.
81. Weeks VS.. Morrill,. Demurrer t
!. declaration sustained.
70. Wells VS.. Chappell. Report 70
plff. s2l2.
"a. Darling and Kicker VS.. Beattie
Judgment for plff. Clerk to assess.
IS. LamsOn VS.. Sanborn and Trus
tees. Report for trustees for costs.
81. Crofts VS.. Clement. Discontin
ued without costs.
SO. Coffrin VS.. Smith. Plff. as depu
= ty sheriff, attached personal propert
? of one Beattie, on a writ in favor {
" Darling, by lodging property in clerk
Office. While this attachment was i
= force, def. as deputy sheriff, attache
" some property on writ in favor {
> Beattie. After this attachment had bee
made by Smith, Darling discontinue
his suit, and the bank of Newbury pu
their writ into Coffrin's hands and b
:. attached same property. Plff. elaine
deft. acquired no lien. Judgment fc
deft. Exceptions.
l0l. Ide VS.. Spencer. Default. Cler
# to assess.
e los. Marshall VS.. Cobleigh. Jude
: ment for plff. Clerk to assess.
12l. Putnam ct al. VS.. Van Dyk,
e Judgment for plff. Clerk to assess.
IS 1913. In re Henry Clark. Prisont
IS discharged from custody.
135. Colby VS.. Colby. Judgment ft
plff. for $500 damages.
, 138. Giltillan vs.. Niles and Martil
: Judgment against Niles. Discontinue
as to Martin
146. Dow VS.. Kicker and Whitehil
Clerk to assess.
Isl. Clark VS.. Peabody & Co. Clel
to assess.
BOOK ACCOUNT.
s. 155. Rollins VS.. Cool and Cool. G
report for plff.
156. Lawrence VS.. Colby. One Gel
for plff.
Dn,,bo.