The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1878-01-11

FRANKIE, ppellant-.Appeal from the Second
II Of Court IariEh of 0rpana

FRANKIE, appellant.-Appeal from the Second
District Court parish OF Orleans:
This fees Of counsel employed by married
woman to defend suit brought by her husband
1e Re hs apsSg be
and wi g. Judgment reversed and plaintiffs al
lowed $500.
tin R Woarner 9a1gi ss' b. seloy from
the Fourth District Court. parish OF Orleans.
: No, 'pn5 5a9s Nichoas Connell, appellant VS..
Alexander Hill.-.Appeal from the Fourth Dis
trict Court, parish Of Orleans.
City Council will be presumed to have observed
all the requirements OF the law in the letting
out OF o contract. Judgment reversed.
BY JUSTICE EGAN
:, No 5ssi. = Marquee y Co., appellants, vs s.
triot Court, parish of Orleans. On rehearing.
Former decrease ashle and judgment appealed
No esol. Edward Meyer. vs. G.. Deffarge. e.
Mehnert. garnshee and appelant.-Appeal
from the Fourth District Court. parish OF Or
leans.
An appeal will not be dismissed on the ground
that there is in the transcript no note OF evi-
dence or statement q laets; when al me eyi, ~
case is documentary has been filed with and as
part of the r!eaddipgs. and is contained in the
transcript. Motion to dismiss overruled anS
No. .is5. e7ss Mrs j. b. Ducoing administratrix,
c s p srs 5ssSph court d4 s parish 81
No $685. Chss d. Everett vs r. Stewart Dem
napS Of fr6 s foa Jadgmen ps
No. GALS. Albert G.. Brice vs. John A. Watkins,
ct al. appellants.-Appeai from The Second Ju-
diciai District Court parish Of Orleans Judg-
N No $50. Mrs, NJ. E. Kirkpatrick ys. Tlnney
Fonr bstrc oopr Parish Il Orleans
rehearing. Former decree amended 80 as to
| disallow defendants claim for attorney s fees
| JuGttppa Epnurar and De Blanc dissent,
No; $500. Mary Johns, sppsllant, vs. II Henry Ty
Brnker1Appea from the siktP n District Court
| By JusTIoE SPENCER.
| No. e4s1 Police Jury Of Plauuemines vs. Jas
| Foulhouz9 and q. B. Sarpy. .appellants.-Appeal
from the District Court, parish, Of Plaouemines.
the express condition that the courthouse
shall b. erected thereon dedicate the property
to public use, and 1t cannot be sold under exc
cution. This exemption from sale is not affect
ed by the fact that portion of the land has been
let out By the police jury for cultivation 1udg
No. $500 Robt Fl. BARLEY vs. City of New Or
leans appelant.-Appeal from the Superior
District Court parish of Orleans. Judgment
| amended by reducing it to 1853 %.
| No. 6sls. Fuelid Borland Jr.. VS.. the Judge Of
the Second judicial District for the parish OF
Where after a default has been entered the
plea of prescription is filed. upon the trial and
oyerrulfng of the plea. If no answer have been
% bo newt dsaa IF bgns moysd
b
No. 54o2. j. II. Montague et. al VS.. We'll 4
Brother. appellants. Appeal from the Sixth
District Court, parish OF Orleans. On rehear-
ing
After the dissolution Of commercial part
nership. in a suit for partnership debt, judg-
ment can be rendered against one of the mem
bets of the firm though the only citation served
upen him be addressed to the firm itself. pro-
yided the accompanying petition designate the
individual thus cited as O member OF the firm
and one Of the defendants. Former decree
maintained.
No es34. Miss Kate Nugent. appellant vs.
John McCaffrey.-Appeal from the Fourth Dis
trict Court parish Of Orleans.
| In the absence of any name as payee In nm
appeal bond the court will supply it by oonsid-
ering the bond payable to the person to whom
the law directs that 1t shall be made payable
the clerk. Motion to dismiss overruled
| No 6s3s. State ex rel. Boutroue vs. The Judge
OF the Third District Court parish OF Orleans
M.ndamus made peremptory.
No G652. J. M. Sierra o hjo appellants, vs
Hoffman & Co. Justin Wolkart tsurety.-Appea
from the Fifth District Court parish OF Or.
l4ans
Plaintiffs obtained judgment against Hoffman
on their bond. Pending the appeal the de-
PENDANTS were adjudged bankrupts and dis.
charged as such. The appeal was tried and
the Judgment affirmed against Hoffman d 60.
who af erwards plea led their discharge. Held
That plaintiffs can recover from the surety
| Wolkart Judgment reversed.