New-York tribune., 1878-03-05
civil. SOTE-.

The Corporation Counsel, in Supreme Cont,
Chlinhc-s yesterday Obtained the d-missl oi tvelyr
suits against The civ FOR want ~ prosecution.
Yandcipocl, Green Il Cunning were suh,ti-
ruted yesterday attorney for Jny Gould IA number
% suits by and aenn. him. IN w'h he has heretofore
bcou rrprc-cut.d los ehraru ~ y >t.r.iuC.
In the suit of Victprnc Ncclo>lcv against
Jasper Lewis 20 set a-id" proceeding. against lei 10
Genc~cc County in unacv. Jud "a. T. wrcncc hrs nri
Ia remove The place of trai - thnt county, II
he viii coucrdc That She WAS I''id'u There.
In the suit or the people on the relation of
Andrew Zr-cr AGAINST Moses kc..cl. 70 remove hn from
hi position ., Comm. -G;ncr 9t chariiio. IN KIM;
County, judo GIhcIt. in Hr1ol'yn yr.t,dn, granted
tl' d"fcnGaut- motion f"r hill o' ltii'nln~.
The Common Pleas, General Term. Judge
R,hnson giving the opinion holes iu thc sing of iau'-
Grafton against Janr- ". Wces-. that when p'g-or
from another -air a.cltul fir United ,lt,- t"i.
m mis- STATE. >tiVc" ~ ISoccss ou .m state -u s
void.
Juier Donoluc granted. yesterday. an order
that William j. Best, receiver ~ t'c National fri 'ri-
parv c,l:ver 10 Mar, Al.u md i've othrr- >91"u'
bond. vithon' other f," tlan thr le,1vg, i'.- ."r
transfer. juc tompau, having changed clJO inr taxing
them ia must. Aprii u. l-'I.
j. Rogers Maxwell and others have brought
snt a-au.t tEo German American b'nh I" have % DE-
csrcd at The b'ui hod, certain rLtci STATE FyPrc>~
tr1l ,ar IN. ranun, judo sanford b., rsii. .cd ma %.
junction restraining tie d..po,uoA oi e ';orh pending
t.c suit.
Judge ~cingr. has sued Jude Mctuirc f,r her Ir+-
bands salary during period when. as she claims her
Iul,e irf Jn,rsc Mconr. drew the salafy / motion
tu place tAc short ilcndar Tor triai dc
nicd, ye,f r,iny, by jude Lawrence.
Helen 5. Folsom began proceeding before
Judge GlcTlccycto cycr her tenant. Edward L. Smith.
and sixteen uudrtcuantH from the tcncmcnhou,c No.
2l2 Thiids Judge Gildcrsccyc decided in her favor.
Al sixteen undclchans took oui writs oi cctior1u 10
Tue SUD-, Court. General Term, 10 r'S.cW the de
csion. Mrs. Fosom's counsel applied. Yesterday 10
Judge Lawrence 10 consolidate these wrtS. Decision
was reserved.
The suit Of COrnclia \. NuSkcy against
John Coohaugh is somewhat unusual in Its Textures.
The plaintiff aud defendant married IN October.
1873 Shc defendant had been previously married and
h- FIRST wife had obtained divorce from him. the decree
containing The usual prohibition AGAINST his
The p'sni m that her marriage him De- an
NonGrmcd the report Of referee awarding her decree.
The suit Of Edward B. Rogers against i. j.
Connolly involves complicated transactions in horses.
He Ella ms that ne bought the horse sunshine warranted
sound from the defendant and finding him unsouud,
exchanged Inn for other horses one aft"r another
lIOpcwcll, Kapdan and Melbourne each occasion
giving the defendant sOmc q" boot He finally eoid
Melbourne for Tl2j. He claims III all T,Ij7 The
j, trial before Judge Robinson in Common Pleas
Special Term.
The Superior Court, General Tenn. has af-
frcd the decision of the referee in the suit OF John H.
Chceyer AGAINST the Gilbert Elevated Railway Company.
II on loan by tho New York. Boston and Montreal
Railroad Company the defendant Of tlOS16 H. The
trranurc Of the railroad company took 1t IN payment
"A debt lin and assigned II 10 the plaintiff and
while tho Gilbert Railway Company had other Iefcnces,
the referee and the Court st their decision the
ground hst the railroad company could not assign 10
their treasurer the clam.
Abraham Van DOlson and others sued VIII
liam T.. AbendrOh general part Of tho firm Of
Griffith WHldrIm which failed, notes OF that firm.
He had suit by other persons been declared general
partner. lie set IA Is answer that IN bankruptcy
uccCdugs 10 which the plaintiffs were parties, the
United states Circuit Court had declared him special
partner The paintiGf dcnurrcd tiInt tins de-
icucc aud the superior Court, Special Term. sustained
their claim. The General Term rcycrses this, holding
That ~ the plaiutins parties TO the bankruptcy
proceeding, they are bound by II.