Belmont chronicle. [volume] (St. Clairsville, Ohio) 1855-1973, 1878-06-06

bill. The consideration of the Revenue
bill was then resumed, and at 4:35 the
House adjourned.
COURT REPORT.
Judge WIN. OKEY, Clerk A. G. OAR
RAH and Sheriff w. G. KINNEY,
present.
Martha pepper vs.. Frank Taneyhill.
Cause and recOgnizance of defendant
continued until next term of Court.
Louchheim Bros. vs.. Max Miller.
Judgment by default against defendant
for $3.50.
Mary A White vs.. Harriet A White.
Partition. Finding: Plaintiff is enti-
tied to undivided tbree-fourths of the
estate. Defendant, Harriet White, is
tenant in common with plaintiff, and
is entitled to one.fOurth part OF estate
and to a dover interest in premises
described. Ordered that writ of par
tition issue to Sheriff commanding
him by the oaths of Granville s. Dill
Ion, DIR. l.. Schooley and Joshua Hoge,
to sell off the estate according as the
parties are entitled, and if partition
cannot be made to cause property to be
appraised free of dover, and report
proceedings to the Court.
Bank of Barnesville VS.. Ellis P Lee
etal. Judgment by default against
defendants for S2441 80, which is first
lien. In default of payment within
five days, real estate ordered sold by
Master Charlesworth. Questions OF
amount and priority of liens of James
/ 7
coming in of order of sale.
State of Ohio We. Richard Corbin ct
al. Riot. Attorney for the State en-
tered a nolle prosequi to the Indictment
in this case.
State of Ohio vs. Lewis Addison.
Riot. Attorney for the State entered
a nolle prosequi in this case because
the name of the prosecuting witness
was not endorsed on the indictment
according to law.
State of Ohio vs.. VIM. NJ. Tolbert
Selling liquor to minor.
State of Ohio vs.. Jas Clark. Keep
ing place of public resort for the sale
of liquor. s....-
State of Ohio vs.. Mary Miller. Muir
der I'd degree, The attorney for the
State entered nolle prosequiesto the in
ldictmentS in these cases.
! Jas V StilweH vs.. Jos. Butler. Judg
ment against defendant for $239. IA. In
default of payment Master Shannon
ordered to sell mortgaged premises.
jas Nichols & Son VS.. Fl Dunn e
oil. Sale by Master approved and con-
firmed and deed ordered.
Isaac Berry ct al. vs.. Elizabeth Bogg:
ct al. Partition. Sale by Master ap
proved and confirmed and deeds or
dered.
Jos H Shannon vs.. Uniontown &
Flushing Pike Co. Continued.
National Building Assn, Bellaire
VS.. Stephen G Dodge ct al.
Carol Build. Assn vs.. Stephen G
Dodge ct al.
Carroll Build. Assn VS.. A E Fortney
+ ct al.
Dismissed at costs of plaintiffs, with
out prejudice to new actions.
Isaac Neiswanger VS.. [ M Riley
admr Ann Mintier, decd. Report
: of arbitrators heretofore appointed ap-
} proved and confirmed; plaintiff to re
cover of defendant $3626.37, amoun
: found due by arbitrators.
Christiana Morton vs. l M Riley
/. admr Ann Mintier. Report of arbi
, traitors approved and considered tina
plaintiff recover of defendant $697.
/: Carroll Building Assn vs. James A
Small ct al. Judgment by defaul
| against defendants for $128.S9. amour
!, found due at present, with $579.10 tt
> become due. In default of paymen
|, Master Charlesworth ordered to sci
mortgaged premises.
, Jas. Kelsey VS.. F. NJ. Snively ct al Judg
ment by default against defendants for SlO47
Harlo Hawkes. VS.. ]. 8. shupe. Dismissed
without prejudice to a new action each party
to pay their own costs.
D T Mccall & Bro. VS.. GAINESVILLE & Hend'
rysburgh, Turnpike Co. Settled and dismis'
sed at cost of defendants.
Rhoda West VS.. Aquills B Clark ct al Judg
[ ment by default against defendant for s25 81
Jos Linkhorn VS. John Wells ct al Judg
ment by default against defendants for Sl25 81
Jos Bamford VS.. Butte & Dunlap. Judgment
. by default against defendants tor $5O6 81.
Robt. M Wilkins VS. Harrison Butte ct al
Judgment by default against defendants fol
g sle40 66, Order for sale of mortgaged premises
to G Kinney Special Master.
James Ferguson EXT. VS. Eliz. Hamilton
= ct at. Judgment by deiauiG against defendant:
p for $1,000. and ordered to Sheriff as Special
. Master for sale of mortgaged premises.
l McPhersons& Dallas VS. Mary Sharp ct al
3 Equities found with plaintiff and defendant
or shannon ordered to sell premises.
D Jas Reilly VS. Bellaire Mutual Building ASST
, Cause referred TO w ID Tallman to tag e teSt1
) mony and that he report the condition OF saiG
Association; value of shares of stock; names
3 OF stockholders with wnom settlements have
= been made and terms of such settlements
names of those with whom no settlement,
have been made and the state of their 40
I counts.
Jno King VS. q King ct al. The real es
tate in this case having been offered for sale
and failed to sell for want of bidders, tn,
Sheriff is ordered to re-appraise said premises
State of Ohio VS. VIM Geller. Grand LARGE
] ny. Defendant with his suroties entered
into recognizance In the sum of$l50 fo
his appearance at next term Of Common Plea
Court.
First National Bank st. ClairsvilIe VS.. "
Jackson ct al. Judgment by confession IL
favor of plaintiffs for S527 IS.
Same VS. Lockwood ct al. Judgment b,
: con nfessien in favor of plaintiffs for S263 80.
Same VS. Morgan Powell etial. Judgment bJ
confession in favor OF plaintiff for 1904 so.