National Republican., 1878-12-03
District Courts.

slrEEME COURT OF THE DISTRICT.
This court will reconvenc to-day, but not go TO
the calendar. Some opinions MAJ bc delivered and
DEGREES made. but the prIncip,c business will he
the hearing oi motions. As the nisi prius courts
all have to come to a stnndstIl to accommodate
the holding Of the general term. the judges do not
think 1t proper or advisable. In view of the large
business before these courts. TO have them stop at
the present time.
EQUITY COURT-JUsTICE MACARTHUR.
The December term Conycncs to-day, at eleven
O'Clock, when the calendar will be called and status
Of cases thereon asCCrtainCd. As his honor will be
engaged In the general term no hearings will be
given, but motions and orders will be probably
acted upon.
CIRCUIT COURT-CHTEF JUSTICE CARTIER.
Deaucr ct al. VS.. Harlan; death OF one of the
plaintiffs suggested aud case to be prosecuted by
The survivors. McLindcn, NdmnistTat0r, vs.. Mey-
ers judgment Of condemnation. Lynch vs.. Balti.
moro aud Potomac Railroad Company on
hearing.
PROBATE CoURT-JUsTICE oLIS.
This court has considerable 10 occupy Us aten
tsn to-day. and will meet at eleven o'clock. His
Honor expects to be in attendance and Will give a
decision In the lOng-cOutCSicl Harrison case.
number of accounts will he presented TO be acted
upon.
CRIMINAL CoURT-JUsTICE wYLIE.
The principal labor Of this court yesterday was
the arranging Of Is two jurics. number Of civil
suits, In which 1.-THE United states was painlin,
were called the Government being ready for trial.
but in every instance the defendants sought delay,
| and all Of the eases went over until tomorrow.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TODAY.
| Circuit CUuIt-thiCf Justice Carttgr.-NO. Is,
| NGndCTwCrkCn ". Green; No. &c, Lewis, trustee,
| &c VS. Tunnv; No 81. Lewis, trustee, Sc., vs.. Nor.
| gan; No. -. London New FORK and Hartford Pub.
| fishing Company vs. Syphcr; No. s. Lewis, trus.
tee &C., v. Paige No 70, Lewis, trustee, &c,
| BARLOW No. aS Lewis, trustee, &c. IS. Aiken 4
Florence; No o. Lewis, ru stCc. &c vs. llavcnnCr
| No. 60, Lewis trustee &c, ". Painter; No g
| Lewis trustee Nc BaSsCtt No CO. Lewis. trus.
| tee &C. w. JufTies * Kbourn; No. g. Lewis trus-
tee &c ys. Jrllrrs: No &, Lewis. trustee, Sc, vs.
| Shepherd: No. - London, New York x Hartford
| Publishing Company VS.. BarTct: No. Il, Greer vs..
| Hliss, No. 20, Lewis, trustee vs. King; No II,
Lewis, trustee, VI swain; No. ILL., Lewis, trustee
| ". Hayden X Eidwcl; No. liz, Lewis trustee vs.
| Hayden. Kennedy, Ct al; No. lla, Lewis, trustee
| vs. Hayden: No. III, Lewis, trustee, vs.. Kidwcll
No. III, Lewis, trustee vs. Wright, NJ. li2 Lewis
! trustee. vs.. l,hCTg: No. ljS Cooke vs. Tenant
| No. lIg Fletcher ct al vs. Carpenter ct al.
| No. lgs. FUusUn ct al. VS.. Georgetown Col
| lcgc; No. rs, DOwd vs. ACkcrs' admins
traitors; No. 9og LuChs vs. Connecticut Mutual Lii,
| Insurance Company; No. III Bcall vs., District o.
| columbia; No. 2ij, Namdcrwerkcn W. CodwisC
| 1t al; 80. ~. McClUsky vs.. Dykes vt al.
| No. ~ Waters Patent Heater COmpuuy rs. CrNw
ford ct al. No. gG,I Waters Patent Heater Com pa
ny vs. Pierce No 9di Fletcher vs. FCtChC r
NJ. 2GN, Waters Patent Heater Company vs. Hall 4
| WulTOus; No. g75, CFcswCll ct al. vs.. Dodge; No
| -7G, BARLEY vs.. Hamilton et al; No. Isl, SlChul
| vs. o BTCn; NJ -gN RcdmRn VS.. Tunnel ct al.
No. SIS, TuOhy vs. Phillips ct al; No. 3}j, WclCl
Hulme " Clark ". MCDalcl No. 3'S, Newton "
Turner y Co; No. $50, Turner sr vs. Douglass c