The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-02-14
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURT-caAMBERs.

By Judge Donohue
Hoffman VS.. COrsen Andrews Va Rooney No q;
Same vs.. same mo. 81; Bremen vs. Noyes; Pond VS..
Cockburn; Thompson Kuster; Pond VS.. Cockburn;
Pond vs.. Cockburn Andrews vs. Rooney; In tho mat.
OF st. Marks Church; Smith Dohon; Davis VS..
Rubenste,n; Rever vs. Morgan; Wight vs.. Hoag!a !;
Robinson vs. Corcoran: In the matter of the petition
OF Elliott: O; Donne VS. Cutter schuohman VS. Suse-
gard; Van Hagere VS.. Jazzainj Adler VS.. Blacx; In
the matter of Megraw, &C.; Duane vs. Duane
Aver vs. Getty; Lyddy vs. wynne; Berge Berge;
Chamberlain VS.. Sloan; Murray VS.. Reilly; Handrlch
va PIaz; Burcheli vs. Sax; Cardwell vs.. Bryne.-
Orders granted.
sheldon Hat Blocking Company VS.. Elchemeyer Hat
Blocking Company. Tourney VS.. The Mayor, &c !;
weymann VS. Tannsnbaum; Pa,chcn w. simpson
Memorandum.
Folsom vs.. Riley; In tho matter OF tho opening of
Eleventh avenue, &c Chesobrough We. Daily mo. u /;
Same VS.. Same mo. 2).--Motions denied.
McCauey vs. Zliss.--Motion dened Memorandum
Potter West Point Iron Company.-Mo tIon
denied ana order dismissed.
Agate vs.. Nchos--ordor dismissed, without costs.
White VS.. white.-Motion granted; $500 allow ancc.
Martinez VS.. Mart,nez-Decrce OF divorce granted
Potler vs. Jowe,t-Grauted. | think the amount
should be 81 50O with leave to defendant ~ move TO
increase hereafter II 80 ADVISED
Todd Vs. Burns.--Granted. Defendant may have ten
days serve his proposed bill oil exceptions pay
mcnt OF $40 costs.
Hammond VS.. Earle.--I think the order broad
enough 10 allow defendant to make the motion.
Cooper VS.. Garvin-Un payment OF the costs OF
former motion ana $40 costs OF this motion and costs
on the default defendant may come In and answer.
LienthaI vs. Ucean National Bank.-M0lon must
be granted unless plaintiff stpuates TO argue or SUD-
init Tue case at March term.
Brewer va Zanderson Motion Denied with costs,
unless defendant gives security 10 pay any Judgment
obtained against him.
SUPREME CouRT-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Lawrence.
Whippe va McRoberts and others Two casesl -
Orders sustaining demurrers settled and signed
COMMON PLEAs-sPECIAL TERN.
BY Judge Robinson.
Wooster &C., W. The Forty second street and Grand
Street Railroad Company. --Rcport oil referee contin
ued ana judgment ordered accordingly.
Smith vs. Rittcrman.-Dcmurrc overruled, costs to
abide event. See memorandum.
Ebbin ghausen vs.. The Worth Club.-Readius
Of costs ordered. See memorandum.
Spencer vs. Spencer otIon Tor alimony ana cou n
sci fee denied plaintiff requiring dIscortnuance OF
her action The attorney cannot enforce any antaao.
uistic rights against mis- Client
Corwin vs. Church.--Demurrer sustained and tudg-
mont thereon for plaintiff unless defendant Church.
within ten days from entry OF order, pay OF
murrer and.servc answer
MAXINE CoURT---sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge sheridan.
savage VS.. brennan; Hurt VS.. The KendalI Biscuit
Company, Mehrback VS.. Roberts; Graey vs. Goad-
ler N ichaelis vs. Rauscn uss Ray nolds William
sou; Kitchen vs. observation-disclosures granted Tor short
calendar
Med with costs
Bogert VS.. Gross.--Stephen II. Turnbull appointed
receiver
Kraft VS.. Bolger.-M otion granted, default opened
anu cause restored on payment OF $40 costs.
sisca Merriam Motion TO dismiss order
granted, without costs.
PENNINGTON vs. Robertson; Braun VI kaufi.-Mo-
lions denied, with $40 costs " abldc event.
sausc restored
Fanki vs. Jones Bond approved
foScstcr vs.. SEEKER, Goiuman VS.. Muhlkcr; Mar
Ahan Va hosoj kksieia Va. Auser; Aaaaosks vs..