Grant County herald. [volume] (Lancaster, Wis.) 1850-1968, 1878-09-12


aiga4w aytcAUsEs IN. COURT. = 4 nm II
II ilJolp Anderson Is Chicago ss T?op nal. I ]
Z I'D Autumn 6sc6. II VINE ,Jcn'etis,
pionlissory mote. .a@aiiai sf9ai is ssUa
1d'S Alex BMleslvss D saWilkiasoa ct al, fore
sclosnfe9as .a9d0saE 10 ynfI see4 cSst
James Brpgey " Henry Parish an, and , VILE
mortgage II
q 8 Adam Bobel vs. Fritz Gaede, land cop
tract. III + "a ,s1isf8 III 81 aaetaa
ua6 JR Budd vs. Mary 4 Budd, divorce, -
III Bertrand & Sames vs. Brandon and jeffrey
Bros, promissory note.
s'f 5 Alex Butler VI Jas G oawley, money de-
imand. nast #GH s ts b
o JOHN Buxton KS John Stephens, morris
gage lal 4aasv .ss s..oss
10 Sam Birch, Guar &c vs. Henry Richmond
ct al, mortgage.
e IL Mary Brown VS. Dora Larkins,yet al. par
tition.s 949 abisa hsHaAi ,fsf89i sts5 !
Isol2s John Crubaugh vs. Sylvester. Keys, dams
Is Frank Darlington IS Harrison Bel, ct d.
money demand. ~ a. .sa9 s4sN'1
a14 Crawford, Mills & Go VS. Failplay level
md Min Go, money demands lss 5vssM
~ Petition Of Chicago a& Tonah I + cp,
=, Y F David ID. II 7 Kay, prolnissoFy
80
IN Mary e Densen vsaEdw ceDensep, die
IS Edw Densen, vs. Mary Z Densen, relief.
Is Nancy Edgerton vs. JAS Ii Brown, prom
issory note ''ssss' 3.t@ai =
s 20 VIM Ennori vs. W II Lightcap, promis-
sorynotey itaaa "a 1estl 4 8ta aa.s
! al. First Nat Bank MeGregorsys Joseph p
Chandler, promissory note ..
% Caroline Fnrman vs. T Furnan,s dis
vorce ST. fa Ht3atf tafag ~
% Mary Ferris vs. Ghstavus Ferris, divorce.
/ "a JV Farwell d. Go VS. Hamilton d Cole.
money demand. - r., Z
% I. S Felt Us freeman Williams, eject
ment At g
2e Sol Griswold ct alsvs Town of Lancas4
ter ct al, Injunction q agatagsa.i s8a +
"a Hannah R. Glenn, vs. Joseph Glenn, di-i
!. IS Hannah 5Glyapn Us Joseph Giynh,, d..
yorce ss'4 stftf &c ,tt8t
n 90 VIM Gearyg vs. Conrad GEM, promissosy
ois 80 John Grlbble, VS. John Cundy, promise
81 Fred Grimm rs Casper Bdnson, ct b,
mortgage ei'll iaiaAt ta ha.if X
80 j NJ Gray vs Thompson Bros, ejectmeht
SO Byron Gilman VS. Chicago & Tomah Il r
Co, trespass M rt has9
81 A G Hough vs. Coryden Fitzgerald, at
tachment. 4
35 r P Huntington, Guard &c VS. Thomas
Chapman, money demand. asa lgsifaf4sti q
S6 G Hawley T. Son Us " Porter Rich, at
tachment.
81 r G Humphrey vs. David snider ct al
4 SO u H HOLMAN VS. j + Munger ct al, pro M
issory note. ss9f q ~ jli3a 4ffd,e
i 80 Huntington Bros vs. Hudson Thomas.
money demand,
40 n G Humphrey vs. Thomas o'shadgaessy,
Al MP Jerdee VS.. Aage Ellington, iprcinis.
42 Annanas Jones vs. George Everett, ap-
peal.
4s Deborah johnson VS. VIM Watson, morris
gage t@ f ~ hastaHa og y
Al Sarah f Jones VS. James Jones, divorce.
~ N Municipalities ysW D Kirkpatri elk,
vendors lien Z
46 August Kaiser rs W & Farfar ct al,
mortgage. 'saaaa 45sa sial aft5
AZ Kelley, Morgan. & CO vs. w II Liglitfoot,
proHlssory note tb ts t ~
As Benz Kilbourn vs. Warden Anderson
money demand.
40 Jennie Kilby VS. Oscar j Kilby. divorce.
+ so Henry NJ Kiheniaii VS. Thomas Graham
ct all partition. ynieA sf. sls
81, John Kaiser ys Andrew Brant, replcvin
81 Kingman vs. Thomas Graham s.
BrenIner, unlawful detainer. ''' ~ - Il
80 Eliza J Jones vs. VIM e Lonras,' divorce
/ 81 G II Nc Cormick & Bro VS. Pat Judge,
promssory note. faash s,
So Henry Nittelberger VS. Wm MAYO etal.
IS J Morrison ct al ex dc VS. John Bevalr,
land contract. ss Hf 'i'" tlt@
81 Karl Missliug'vs e Bailey, appeal.
SO VIM McGarry vs. Jas Ballantine ct al,
50 Elijah Maiden vs. John .schabesr ct a i,
mortgage. ef
so james Miles vs. W F Roberts 81 al,
mnrtgage.i s.E A esa4s atn hna
81 Henry May VS. Andrew Brant, reple vim.
81 Elijah III Maiden VS. Rich'd Moyle ct al,
IS R II Mcclellan Us Rich'd Thomas ct al,
mortgage. #Sag3a sal
"a Antoinette Mckinney VS. n Jones, land
contract. ,is,.3.s-.. .
65 9 II Mccormick & Bro vs. Kirkpatrick
& Meyer, promissory note. Az 8lt59a'35
lA 66' Walker Nc Cord VS. Hamilton & Cole, at
tachmentsn yaw daaa@s lisa .4a.
81 John Moore vs. Margaret Moore, divorce,
4 6S Rebeccaat McReynolds VS. Chicago q To-
nah Co, trespass.
8 90 Herman Nelson vs. Owe Martin, Adm &c,
iifDt tSa8t g 49, t4af tift%s
10 Pelu ohlert vs. Magnus Bull ct Al, mort
I. T N 9 Pease vs. Lewis Adkins Ct al, M rt-
2 ~ Mary Penglase VS. Samuel Pcnglass, dr.
yoree. sa8 a46. 4caa uaY afa3ee -
damages. as' ff ~
IA Mary Probst VS. John Thomas ct al, mort
gage. ass4 =
tl75lNaM ProEis vs. IA Proyis, promiss9ry'
e Martin Philips 5vr II Chicago d rsQap9
n Elizabeth dPaaord Tvs WIN PafFord, di-
vorce. saY go
ii IS ". y Guam. g. Co, VS.. David and Tay lor,
10 IN Redding vs. Ritner Stephens aid 5iiidf wife, !
mortgages 40 eaEaH $50 .faagsfsk4sEa
! soHSoIomon Roth VS. M@iTer d, Gaitma an,
moneyydemand. asilati s5ssTaa & Ufe4@ 'a
i 81 sql9man Roth vs. Meller & Gartnfap,
attachment.
50 Andrew Ritthfe vs. James Day ct al,
money denand.su lsf9at4~Eia 81 III AUoi
ass8lJno S Kicker ct al vs. Edw'd Meyeret al,
money demand. il 4 A4I..
note. "'Hs"s tA7' once itSffS' t5'3H
SIS Rutland & Busch, j.x Sc ivs John Hell
bing, to refosa deed. ssliai ~ ~ II
SO Elizabeth. Rose VS. j ~ Rose, ,ggarnish
ment.
81 in Rodintree " owe II stout etal, |
Tvs ba4HuhA "a
i SIS Gath Schroeder ss III N, ,seilreiber, d.
xorce. ~ III agsttf sta5 Aa lei As4aa4niy
50 Mary Sheldon ys Mary 2 nle e 4 eetIal,
: 90 Victor s NJ Co gsW II stewart, PROM
issorv note. tIiasasHa
Il 81 Chas aSenlmern VS. Robert Williamson. CT |
% Conrad Schmidt vs. IS Mary ard Frlnz
i'iss Thos r. Chapaaeh " Theoph Chapman,
money demand gsaaNI 8agafl ifAln /.
4 "a g y + schroudenbaeHli Us Phil Berntgen |
ct al, mortgage ~
s5 Andrew Smith Us Michael jacob I'll al, |
1aa fsFta ail
j 90 Christine sInids vs. Joseph stsekert ct |
al, money demand. .lN 4ss8 yH bgstt4sse Il
~ w I Scott vs. NJ 7 David, contract.
SO Conrad Schmidt VS. Franz Scherr, money /
demand tsA+ sa=tfl q e3fks4ta ~ sstitsf
4ss Monroe Trumbull W iWn. Grant, tres
pass 4HAlfos ~
400 Sarah 3 Whit VS. " Whit divorce
1ol Watson Miner & Co ys, James Jones,
mechanics lien.