The New York herald., 1878-02-07
DECISIONS.
SUPREME COURT CHAMBERS.
Dy Judge Donohue.


Schuyler vs. Cronnin; Langdon va. simon; Embury
vs. WhitnacK; Davis vs. Rabenstein IN tho matter OF
society," ys powers sas
table Lilo Assurance Socety VI. Twomcy; Same vs.
Same; Equitable Lie Assurance Society vs. Powers;
Equitable Lille Assurance Society w Bowcrman;
Marshall va. Tweed; MeCaun Vs. Diensefertg; sud-
her Grace; Simon vs. United states Of America;
Bowen George; Williams VS.. Coslne Williamson VS..
Aud; Cummings va Berge; Germauia Fire Insurance
Company vs.. Memphis and Cburoston Railroad Com
vs. Spina in the matter or Donlinck; In tho matter
OF Wiebasky; Roosevelt vs.. Adams, and Same VS..
Same.-Granted.
Hurley vs. Everette; IN tho matter OF the Society
for the Reformation Of Juvenile Delnquenls; IN tho
matter OF the Brooklyn Bsidse; Mcleod vs. .GrleOeI;
Banney Levy; Thompson vs. Gilmnp Kittlc vs..
Ainslee; Nelson VS. living. ana Dc Coufcy va. Stew
arL-Motions denied
tions granted.
Folsom vs. Riloy.-Dsnoa, $40 costs.
kaliske va Maclise; Hemsen -. Komscn; Foley vs.
Krsuder VS. Kann.-braer signed d,smissing mo-
In tho matter of A. J. Megraw.-Expianation re-
Qured.
In tho matter of tho Eclectic Assoc,ation.-ordor
In tho matter Of A. 7. Millor.-Motion denied.
Memorandum.
Kelso VS.. Best, receiver, &c-Hugh Donnelly ap.
O'Gara VS.. Kearney.-order amended.
In the matter OF Decentralization granted.
Horslord vs. Brown.-Moton donicd, with costs.
The Vulcan Iron Works vs. Hewey.-i 40 not think
Tho Rendering Company VS.. The Mayor, &c.-Mo-
tion granted on payment of costs to date, &c.
Gruet vs.. Gruet.-See Laws OF 1887, page $50, sec.
tion az, SUBDIVISION 4, second paragraph.
BY Judge Lawrence.
In tho matter OF Norwood.-Grunted.
Bates VS.. Springgate.-Ordor granted.
SUPERIOR CoURr-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge spolr.
American National Bank VS.. Wheelock.-Case ana
exceptions settled.
Davies VS.. Tho Mayor, &c-The motion to strike
out the answer sham Is denied, with costs.
Grim Va. Grm.-Order that tho plantH be en-
titled 10 alimony and reasonable counsel leo until
further order Let the order ne settled notice.
Clanip et al vs.. McGuire ct aL-rbe plaintiff must
have Judgment the claimed IN the coin plant.
Arnold Vs. Goodwin ct aL-Moton for q lurther bill
OF particulars denied, with $40 COST
Wnteside VS.. Reilly, &c.-Orders on motion to SUBJ
stltute granted.
Qulrk VS.. Derrckson ct aL-Mo,ion Tor u new trial
denied.
Hardy, &C., vs. Blum.-Motion for appointments Of
receiver, &C., granted.
Donohue vs. O'Connor ct al.-Complalnt dismissed,
with COSTS
Corbett vs. DC Comeau.-Ordor denying motion for
rcscttlemeut 0i order
BY Judge Sanford
Pierson, &c, VS. Partridge ct al; Martin vs. Muir
ply ct aL-Reierencc ordered.
Fellows ct al vs.. Tho National Burglar and Theft
Insurance Company.-Ordered on special calendar
February 10.
Conover VS.. Conover.-Order settled.
KHAN vs. schotte-Order granted and undertake
ings approved.
McDonouRh VS.. Martin OF al; Provost VS.. Herman
Weddcgen vi. Surcherveir; 10 tho matter OF Klen;
The People, &c., The Mayor and others; Kent
Rochin.-Ordes granted
COMMON PLEAs-CHaMBEIs.
By Judge Van Brunt
White VS.. White; In the matter oil tho assignment
Of Forster TO Aaron.-Appcation granted.