The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1878-06-02
went M shoulder high the oath was said he

went up shoulder high the oath was said; he
"iPo,tnr" rnsm '' Win some iimnrossmont mora
thnn usunl-that Is. he held 10y each end n worn.
crumpled proof slip paper. written on in pencil;
OF a newspepcr Office after hard days work Is
though it we're heavy, Potter said; -,
James e. Anderson, the witness testiying
he had receivod from the hanis Of b. A. Weber
| q letter purportngto to be signed by you. Of which
that which now show you Is copy VIII you
That said, Potter handed the soilcd slip to
hands. looked at It, raised 1t to the light, mo;
chaqhiCally Pvt his hand to the eEoglSss cqchGd '
cs s' % Spnsd H % coa s Snd IN arew
oyer his head the long. elastic cord, to which
his own glasses We're fastened and handed
t6s lGIra tine @ vas eyer, iIiied Ss Rssd;. lie
sharp hiSt at the cheat which nigh, have been
Gher who 6eeyed fRs letter
may ,, Be, the e. Anal NAL necessity @ Of approsc6Ins
this letter 50 hatly that its ,prodpetion
would make his answer perjury. He did not
swer be perjury. He ls safe there. Speaking
slowly and syllable at q time. like man con-
ming written answer. he said;
respcnsibiii,y and the oath that / have taken en-
that never, wrote such letter. have no re-
am not mistaken about the dates. on
the day when The Returning S3hcoTs iirst con-
| vcncd TO open tho returns. think 1t was on
the goth. At that time ! knew but little
about tho transaction. The papers had
time, there, nre things in this letter
| that would have written TO these or any other
| men who Were engaged in the performance of
asked; but / do moi believe wrote that letter
This was all n high officer had to say of tho
| authorship Of letter which may yet impcach
him. He rose. At the same moment Anderson
to speak. but he said nothing. 1t was better
Somewhat hastily sherman said the word or two
walked out with somewhat iroer step than he
came. He waa relieved. The moment had como
Ts door 9h9s 4S been s6me
| one me, and greeted him kindly. He had come.
he had testified, he was well nigh gone, and a
nearer Solution. Mcmahon called for the letter G
competent instead OF aye. meaning. doubtless.
| 20 say that he did not vote with the Democrats
as such. but regarded the letter as competent
evidence, made up q vote, in which ak men
voted for the reading and four against Il.
Stengcr was absent The letter was read. 1t
ran as follows.
Nor. y A W.,>r and Jpaf. 4 md, IN.
cevcd Seimer Mr. Hayes myself The semtemeg Ses" who I
accola me- nor The country at arEe can ever iorget
should YOU stand nrm the position you have taken
Hsyt avn l0 aca f a IN a.mn m T "Gy o,
nTg9'; made and WI sass"n,cs ,na, YOU win be pro
ieable aud in such manner will enable you both to
cave Lous4S sTs S Sgl lsS4 ySq deem ss
The following correspondence was brought
| ont in the course OF the examination Of Ander-
Hf NEw YORK sun sun SS ncssng s m copes TH o St the
Weber and Anderson letter to John sherman.
and sherman's reply. and six original letters
Weber. ani one. the last, to 7. G. Butler, Let
initas)
Nrw oRrr,s. July ? 1877
wss5 s9S s. AIs:n ws5s re
| laste.eton s"me time during the pas, winter Weber
scaigpaa T Of INT. ey' ey fd'rp .aikctPns @ "aH mi.
g n,a was ogs"'S, d,hc4y by ,m,'sAe and 'S9
document. which. mAcn IN rotation - iate. form al
ana " fcr WA. kicin March ami Anderson is Uow
may m BE- ' aoc 'S for future aars use as '''' E
Letters from Anderson to Weber:
ctl>roS, Ia. Sept 10. is7e
i.soins .mceihy wih ne Tht DcmocTa,, are .a,i.d"i
i'n. iM' NY rnnec my pemocra,ic cnpE apH ' hSPN
& Ge nm"eTit, mean anu Hing M we no" ,h6n now ~
have fa.r deal ani that pfopo., give them Asfor
@ II w' s r. ~ s % @ g . 'a ,G 9' ,G PnNf' A.! sd s y.
Nv T. Harris li. h.eu here looking nter Packard >
iFS1g 5m parish I YOU s ~Srs to g'Is" rks mi: nsR wk
nne tooth comb YOU could not nnd that uunbcr VI Re
a Republican majority than there are Republican
ky n'ormia9n You can givs me On The .aSicSst iSiics
, @ be ;. ,S,s sys1Jsy guI reSsysd sr, IL simply imss-
bc GRAY. Bicr. Campbell 4 60 swear ihcy viii have
% + e %' .aa a".' ais;'' a'' tsG qGaa i
A. empnsuS ~, IN a;,ernns the, they VII not
s t S9 ine5 ' a 6a5i! Sa,SHi and d"''a' 50 sos.
rsaa1eG mi ami aiy maxim. beyeT. You can say oTfs" TO L.
W6s NE p5Sibesin Ws:F 4, W s imrre;ca Ii p1y ist
SSnns more lore % Yours 4'' 0' ssSed sS Will - ' Asa
nsAs D9y WI SayS on Saturday sny pT New 2resp.
tcssS e o On saturday nsh have earned s Pdts tT poh
the 3 1' sch a 9s Ss have ys Ssmsy sssa
pore than my suspicious IN this matter might pursue
a SiSn A KNOW %ho a" Ss S' Of '1 y aan % inS w9 a
And lhe mquye. thataetuaed him VIII write {oM nom
"'DD XIV ""'P L A
;s g r. inTs.;P % 4 S l {sg,sS
tccan' agii' throw ihc onu, Of ut aIar On nv n
6c '..r. nv r9'arn &C. fhS wH. az upH i
attempt - caYe wspl undelbp4y be- a'c,ici ou .0mc
ihcm. pi course nothing can ~, vIu convince the
aqo'f''' !Sa ,da sa1' ann am not @ IN, '""sy%in ] an"
S an Me a .t aa1 am 2@ ea @ .. AL I"u yt
,h,re j. maya shI, A. AN convinced tNt rscEsri
ar @ AMI '' ti%Pe soa ID nst s vs Al S.'i :t S' '
THey haye also eoaSSdca St the 6 6omISe4sl. IsT.4
nave mSy .rcI G, town Iiay ,y E"fN 4. m a9,
a. ro..,ie pr dray ha' Aw4,s olp..~d hi' ami al.
ihi. he ha, been seconded Gy Kcl'",g Jtwc,i aahii
ohgr in,y age not iecii t. o,ocatc aM garry oui any
allow them % saddle nc blame on me, reni
=. r.. ulhyap tcket N III, n,li 4nl cansgncntIy icw
4 fltut tls