Daily globe. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1878-1884, 1878-06-17

ought to be some organised movement for
tho protection of property. The language was
without excitement on my part or on his 90 Tar
as knew. told him had to go away for
timid for my family. There was
any kind. On the other hand, I felt friendly
interest in Mr.. Baird and was talking with him
in a friendly spirit, and simply with desire
to see him do his duty faithfully. We parted
perfectly friendly, and met again that after
noon in perfectly friendly spirit. There was
nothing violent occurred at the time and for a
long time subsequent our relations were per-
fect1y friendly
Judge Page was cross-examined briefly by
Mr.. Clough, and before leaving his seat, adj
dressing the president he said: l desire to ask
single question with yourlpermission, relating
to this matter. desire to know if the con-
struction of the Senate upon the fifth article is
that the question of my guilt or innocence as
to that article is to be determined by this
Senate without any hearing on my part7
The President-I understand the ruling to be
that the fifth article is to remain upon the
pleadings alone, and that no evidence is to be
received.
The Witness-The respondent is not to be
heard at all in regard to that matter!
The President-I so understand it,
Senator Doran thought the Senate had hardly
done the respondent justice by limiting him SO
closely as it had upon the Baird matter and
called attention to the fact that the examina-
much more ground.
Mr.. Clough declared the managers were not
responsible for the scope given to MIR. Baird s
testimony. most of which was brought out
upon the cross-examination.
Mr.. Davis, while not doubling the Senate in
tended to be perfectly fair in its ruling, held
that an in ustice had been done respondent by
not allowing him to rebuff all matters touched
upon by Mr.. Baird. In the same connection,
he stated that all the evidence, except the doc
uments before alluded to, respondent proposed
to submit, was in.
Senator Giltillan felt confident there was no
intention on the part of the court to do in JUS
tice, and upon his motion the Senate again re-
tired to consider the matter when, after brief
discussion an order was adopted to strike out
all evidence relating to the third specification.
Upon the doors being reopened, a recess was
taken to 2:3O Pm.
Afternoon Session.
At 2:3O the president called the court to
order, but count showed only some ten Sen
ators in their seats. The Senators gradually
dropped in to the requisit twenty-one and
respondent called
MIR. HENDERSON,
banker at LIE Roy, who produced the checks
of Igmundson in favor of Sevor Quom, treas.
urer of the town of Clayton. They were one
drawn August 2, 1875, for $780, payable to
Sevor Quom, one drawn August 2, 1875, fol
$47.52, payable to Sevor Quom, and the other
Of the same date for $50, payable to Quom.
D.B. COLEMAN
was called and shown the above mentioned
checks, when he swore that the check for 800
dated August 8, was the one he received from
Sevor Quom. The others corresponded with
the stubs shown him by Mr.. Ingmundson in
his Office.
Mr.. Davis again announced that, with the
resolutions before made, their case was closed.