The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1878-05-17

tries were made in various cases, as follows
VIM d. Hilton and wife VS.. John Clark
judgment by default Webster for plaintiffs
Joseph Hanway vs. David Hanway; agreed
Lee for plaintiff, Van Bibber for defendant.
G. A. McComas VS., Thomas B. Stokes
judgment by default. Archer & Van Bibber
for plaintiff.
H. Hopper & Co. vs. Mitchell and Michael
judgment confessed. Stump for plaintiffs
Maynadier for defendants.
u. M. Osborn & Co. VS.. H. B. Walker AID
Alex. McComas; judgment confessed. Vel
lott and Gilbert for plaintiffs, Rutledge for
defendants.
Bowman, use of VIM. E. Jewens, VS.. AL
bert Lohin judgment confessed. Gilbert for
plaintiff, Hopkins for defendant.
John Daugherty vs.. Samuel Ward and
Robert Little; judgment by default. Lee for
plaintiff.
Wilson, Colston & Co. VS.. Hiram and Jesse
Walker; judgment confessed. Lee for plain
tffs, Rutledge for defendants.
Benjamin Jones VS.. Richard Hughes and
Others; judgment confessed. Lee for plain.
tiff, II. W. Archer for defendants.
Robert A. Whiteford VS.. John Ward; judy
ment by default. Lee for plaintiff
Henry p. Underhill VS.. Abraham Sherzer
and wife; judgment confessed Lee for plain
TIN, Young for defendants.
Towner, Landstreet & Co. VS.. Joseph Han
way, garnishee of Joshua A. Hanway; judg
ment condemnation confessed, Webster for
plaintiffs, Lee for defendant.
Same vs.. Joshua A. Hanway; Judgment
confessed. Webster for plaintiffs, Lee for
defendant
VIM. G. BARRIERS Ex'r vs. Hiram and Jesse
Walker judgment confessed. Hopkins for
plaintiff Rutledge for defendants.
G. w. Lee vs. Holland, Pyle and Holland;
judgment by default Lee for plaintiff.
James X. Hamilton VS.. A. Z. and J. j.
GLADDEN.; judgment confessed. Archer &
Van Bibber for plaintiff, STREET. for defend
ants.
James M. Tombstone VS.. James T. Knight;
agreed. Williams and Price for plaintiff,
Farnandis and Young for defendant. .
Davis u Pugh vs.. same; agreed. Same
counsel.
Roland 81 Co. vs.. same; agreed. Williams
for plaintiffs, Farnandis and Young for de,
PENDANT.
Ann NJ. Richardson VS.. Mary E. Amos ;
judgment on terms 10 be filed. Webster for
plaintiff, III. w. Archer for defendant
Joshua Rutedge VS. James A. Amos; judg-
ment confessed. Webster for plaintiff, Ii. w.
Archer for defendant.
Davis & Pugh vs. Henry w. Hopkins; off.
Gilbert for plaintiff Dallam for defendant.
A. j b. Almony VS.. John Shaw; Judgment
on terms to be filed. II. W. Archer for
plaintiff, Webster for defendant.
Jacob H Hess VS. Hiram B. Walker judg-
ment confessed. Williams for plaintiff, Rut-
ledge for defendant
Henry Hess VS.. Gabriel Smithson; Off Web
ster for plaintiff.
Walton, Whann & Co. vs.. William R.
Martin; judgment confessed. Hopkins for
plaintiffs, Williams for defendant.
James Smithson vs. Stundley Holland; off,
Maynader for plaintiff, Young for defend
ant.
John Ditwiler vs. John J. Lowe and wife;
judgment condemnation nisi. Williams for
plaintiff.
John II. Nonemaker VS.. John w. Strife
hof and J. II. Nonemaker; judgment on
terms to be filed Webster for plaintiff, S.
Archer for defendants
The case of John Y. Pierce vs. Thomas
Littg and others, commenced on Tuesday
morning, was still on trial yesterday. This
is suit involving the title to so acres of
land, situated near Emmorton, which is
claimed by both parties under title deeds and
mixed possession. H. w. Archer and Young
for plaintiff, Farnandis and w. G. Scott for
defendants.
The following cases were stettcd:
Sarah Seminar vs.. Peter Peterson; SANDER;
Constable, Farnandis and Stump for plain.
tiff, Mccullough and Ii. W. Archer for de-
PENDANT.
E. G. Hipsey & Co. w. David Hanes.-
Gilbert for plaintiffs, Archer & Van Bibber
for defendant.