Bristol news. [volume] (Bristol, Va. & Tenn.) 1867-189?, 1878-07-23

~ Htt rum " tHC 1)IfotDC NSfCS
The Editor OF The INDEX APPEAL
at Petersburg. makes in The Is.ur a
his paper nf the 10Th INST, the follow
ing publication
BRISTOL July Il 1878
Editor LadCT AlpcTt:
SsR-In !"ur nIeI Of July 9th ar
peaIS the fUIi"wlrg:
The ViRHI, IA ProPIE saws, Col. Full
ken son took occasion IN Lis speech ut New
",ri., to FAY that the Richmond DIsPATtI
Was edited on Wall street, ard TINT A.
"fIpdiug press as lie closes to term tn,
debt paw ing p;.Ue"s, are mt satellites o
this Richmond rr. In tGer words ",
are all bought a..d paid TT "
"Whereugon, the Richmond DIsPATCi
said that he knew that he lied when he sni,
whit he di' aChich is oar 1cdy Of think
ing about the matter"
In offering me this insult. contain
ed III J"ur eu'inr=' meut of the Ian
GUuge al iliF Dispatch. you could not
hsN~ known {. INV iriIer under date
Of Jul, Ssh oths Editor uf the BTis
tot -NC1US. 81 | rumid hot then Love
Seen the inI"RnIl!g quotation Since
| i'ttt'fb' tiiijit hIlAiEI tl1tH
| july IA Ilt D.xDutch has corrected
ai.d 'Nirrss' Il regret TOR, ihp inius
lice ii had done me- Tut so far YOU
have neglected. to revoke the insult
offered ME hy your PAPER
! Thtrrinip il Is that invite your at.
| tentinn to the matter, rot believing
| THAI y"u can hesitate 10 make srcl,
| full ard public rei'araiIun 81 is clue
me. Rel ectiu!ly yours.
4. FULKERsnN.
"Cnl FUlk"Isnn's letter 10 ikp editor
Of the iirIsTu! NCUs. dated July Sth
| to which he refers ahnve, Was iienial
| at the language imputed 30 him W.
| had not seen this letter at the time. al
our writing, consequently what We
said was BASED on the suppOsitiOn that
Col. +. bad used substantially the Ian
,:'iare attributed 80 him by the JIr
giRid People This We regard, q rs n
anton aud nwmTrHI3tahle outrage
on the character of the debt paving
pHppTs of the State unrSrlf ruuOny
he TrTt. We are grHtifird, how ever,
t. learn from Col. FulErrSOn that lie
has not used such lHugUagr, and
therefore. we have no hesitation in
W. hdrawIng. ~ 81 IiRttrC If rIyhU and
iI>nte The offensive aliu-inn we have
uIaue 10 bin. and To- cypress our re-
grpt, in "mEL mon with the DiSD0Fch
that We hive hen mislrh iiiIn de-
LUuucing him for u hat hr did not say "
Now. while tie amp;'d here made
by Mr.. RaThanI l. in itself all that
could have cen asked, aud IL sat;siac
tory. there IL hnweve-, ia hiE pulIIirH
ton OF my letter Ia HIM aIi UnIskiOn
%! part Thereof. which 7 drsITp shall
he supplied. 1t II due tn truth aud
proper understanding uf the mnIfpr
between Mr.. Bariam and my self thai
my letter in full shaII appear. aud
hence this Publication with The FOL
lowing correspondence in full:
BRISTOL, July IL, 1873.
, r 2. RARHAM, ESQ. Editor of the
Ltder 1Ppeut Petersburg, Va.
SIR In Your paper of July 9th, ap-
I'ru's The following:
The Trg'njn People says Col
FuikerSrn took orcasiUIr. ~ his >Ie,.cE !
At Nrwimrn. 40 say that the RichInni,s !
Dispatch was edited in Wal ntr.+l
ana That the ''iundIng press" Hs h- |
shnS,-S Ia term The deht-l,aViny ra
itrs. are tut satellites at Ihis Rich |
nI0nd pa;er In other words, that We. |
ire h"ughi and Iaid for.
IN hPrrup"n Ih- Ri'hnnnh Dis |
)Gtch SAYS Il'at Mr.. Fuikersun knew
hat hr lid " hen hr eaid " LnI Il,
I'D, Which is our aOny If thinkiHfl
tout tie DInttc.'."
la Offering M This insult contained
u your rnd"r-' mrnt uf the Language.
II the Di>pHtch YOU cnuli rUt have
Known of NV ie ter, under date 81
nay Sth. I" the Editor at The Bristol
AetON. a. | ruiIid not then have stt.I
lrr foregoing quotation Sinre Ihi-
of mine under date of .Ju.
Y Sih, the DiSDntch has cnrreclrd
'hd tXrIes--Ii g. : rrt 5cr, the il Justice.
had n"nt hut ~ far rnu have urp
ecte the rev i thu insult Offered
III ny y"Gf rafrI.
Therefore il * that | inv iip vnur al
"niion tn the mHi;er, not heI,eviny
hat ynn can hesitate 10 make sucI,
uil mad pablo reIaraIion ~ il u1r
IL :'Id InA friend. Mr. !. g. Fowler
= "a h"r tht- wIil he lIaI ,lpd Won. *
'Jih"r'Zrd Ia ACT for nue in the u,4fni-
-. es..teifuI'y yours.
a. FULKERsoN.