The Bolivar bulletin. [volume] (Bolivar, Hardeman County, Tenn.) 1865-1888, 1878-01-31
NV Mitchell, ct al VS. J W whitmore ct

report of sale confirmed, decree for title etc,
C and II to pay carrington's debt and bal
ance to complainant, etc.
James B Harriss vs. W C Hull, decree
for complainant, order of sale and same TO
be suspended to December 1, 1873.
John A jacobs, VS. J NJ Bowling, ct al,
cause continued because time for taking
proof has not elapsed.
VIM II Brswn, Va B Malone, ct al, death
of B ] Malone suggested and admitted and
cause continued by consent.
N Powell, vs. Mary Warren, ct al
decree for complainant declaring his rights.
Reference as to amount, commission to pay of
Homestead, saleordered. Appeal dissllowed
VIM Overton, for use A A Coleman,ys
Mont Jones, complainant incompetency
waived and consent decree, cost to be equal
ly divided and execution stayed II months !.
A A Myrick, VS. Jno n Whaley Petition
of Mrs Susan Whaley allowed to file
an answer and cro6sbill without bond, decree
declaring $475 and interest a lien on land
and good agaisnt homestead. Complainant
entitled to no relief as S95 being usury.
All cost taxed against complainant and
surety
Fl Kahn & Sons, vsJ T knight cause
continued by complainant
w A Newland, vs. W C Adams cause
revived by consent in name of w w II
Gillispie, Admr w c Adams decd, and 40
days allowed him to answer
Harkins & Durrett VS. Jno 1 jacobs,
cause continued because time for taking
proof has not elapsed.
Calvin Sain, VS. Jno Jacobs, cause con-
tinued because time for taking proof has not
elapsed.
Frank Lambeth, VS. R L Brint, ct al.
Cause continued because time for taking
proof has not elapsed,
w D Shearin, VS. Jno 1 Jacobs ct al,
cause continued because time for taking
proof has not yet elapsed.
VIM NJ Beck ct al va II Brint ct al.
Cause continued because TINS for taking
proof has not elapsed.
Leonidas Bills, VS. George II Dugan. No
ton to continue disallowed
Armistead & Polk, VS. \ 81 Morrison, de-
cree for complainant. Order of sale etc.
A A1sLambeth & Co Us n + Brint, ct al
| proof has not expired.
Armistead & Polk VS. Ingram Wilson, ct
al, cause continued by consent
p Miller for use of Northern VS. VIM
Savage ct al, decree for complainant, order
Of sale, etc.
Francis Fentress VS. T f Upshaw, decree
for complainant and order of sale, etc.
d J Newbern for use of w \ Mask, VS. V
A White, ct al, decree for complainant and
order of sale, etc.
Eli Moore VS. a. J. Moore, continued be-
cause time for taking proof has not elapsed
Oily Keller by next friend, ETC., VS. L
Bills, ct al, demurrer sustained as 10 firtle
and oyerruled as TO Bills DEPENDENT al
lowed so days to answer
1 N Crome, Admr, etc, VS. 7 J Taylor, bill
dismissed by complainant at his costs.
NJ: Crome, Admir-, etc, vs. Abel Stewart
bill rendered SO as to make heirs of j u
Dean, decd parties compliments.
j S R Jarman Exr r + Jarman, decd, v.
] r S Jarrasri az, petition Of John Mills 4
become party to defense allowed, and c NJ
I WellOns appointed guardian al liten. fol
minor defendants
Ella G Randolph VS. G N Lambeth ct al
demurrer Withdrawn and defendants allow
ed 30 days to answer.
VIM N Kinnie and wife VS. c VI LambetI
ct al, demurrer of defendants overruled anC
they allowed 80 days to answer.
J K p Lambeth vs. 7 Hudson, Adnr
ETC. decree for complainant declaring com
plainant's right to have so much of defend
ants distributive share as may be necessar,
to pay compliments claim subjected tc
payment thereof. Reference to c & NJ.
Polk & Bowers, Admrs, ct al, VS. W F
Hamlet, decree for complainants Order o
sale, etc.
A NJ Lambeth, Jr., VS. J C Savage ct al
demurrer of defendant overruleJ, injunction
disallowed as to taxes Of 1876. Bill by coz
sent dismissed to Chairman of Count,
Court; so days allowed defendants to ans
wer. Judgment on injunction bond.
, Peter Minter VS. Margaret Minter, decree
for complainant for divorce; costs to be paic
by him.
$ Thomas Boyle VS. NJ II Pirtle, note reduc
+ ed to Judgment.
. NJ P Cross VS. J ] and w II Raincs, re
: port Of sale by c & n confirmed; decree 70
title, etc.
: Jno II. Reed VS. II C Knowlton ct a
: judgment VS. complainant in favor of c ,
!, III accrued in his favor
w r Arbucklc VS. NJ Morgan, Adm
demurrer withdrawn, defendant allowed 8
i days to answer.
CM Lambeth VS. VIM Mckinney an
= wife, demurrer OverruIed, complainant an
.e surety to pay costs.
r Tate & Hill VS. J NJ Cofiubury ct al, ord,
pro contesso as to all defendants; reference
r c & II to ascertain whether property can |
divided, etc.
! X Herman and wife VS. Kearney
Harriss, Admrs, demurrer Withdrawn an
! defendants allowed 30 days to answer.
n Hsrdenan county VS. n Powell ct a
bysoonsent defendants allowed 80 days
Il answered. II Wellons appointed guard;
ad Item for minor defendants.
IS VIM NJ. johnson ct al VS. n Luton al
- wife, defendants BY consent allowed 80 da
Is to answer
G, Harleman county VS. A Campbell ct ;
). bin amended and dismissed as to L G. Ian
beth, demurrer Withdrawn and dcfendar
g allowed so days to answer. Frank Lal
in beth appears by consent \ NJ Lambeth, ]
Ia and Is made party to defence.
Hardeman county vs. J c Savage ct
nd order pro coafesso as to defendant Johnso