The Democratic press. [volume] (Ravenna, O. [Ohio]) 1868-1901, 1878-02-14
COURT CT COMMON PLEAS.
HON. p. D. coNANT. JUDGE.

hun. Il. Ds CONANI: JODUE.
The following summary of the pro
ceedings since our last report az.
gathered from the journal:
| Adoiph IL rmsn VS. Bartheielny Viii
kiiis., ef. al. New appraisal ordered.
William Gardrey VS. Rcmelia Rich
ards, ct. al. Jury trial, verdict iol
Pl'ff for $39.25. P!'f gives notice o
motion for new trial.
| Horace ID. Hinckley VS. Romaiis
| Richards. Sheriff sale confirmed and
deed ordered.
Frederick III. Adams vs. G. Lafay ettt
Proctor. Judgment for Pi'T by defaui:
tor $I37 so aud costs.
Marcus u.a: VS. Norris O:mstead.
Admir- ct. al. Sheriffs sale conti m
and deed ordered.
Il. A. Davis vs. G. S. Curtiss. Mo-
ton to set aside sale Overruied. Sl!e
confirmed and decd ordered.
| State VS. Theodore Burnett. Iudict-
nent for violation OF liquor law. De-
iendant failing to appear his recogui-
snee was declared forfeited.
Ida Chit!enden VS. Charles Chiticn-
den. Divorce granted. Custody OF
Rena CniLtendeh, minor child, dee: eed
to plaintiff. Decree that petitioner
recover of defendant the sum of S40O,
as alimony and costs OF suit.
Albert a. Thayer, Guardian, VS. Hell
ena McGuire. Sheriff sale confirm :
cd and deed ordered.
William Lines vs. Charles Lines, ct.
al. Partition. Commissioners repor,
that premises cannot be divided by
meles aud bounds without injury 10
aluc thereof, which report is confirm
ed, and it is ordered that Sheriff sell
the premises according to law.
Bein and King VS. VIM. A. Walker,
Y. d. Dunbar and Ibeming Seymour
judgment for plaintiffs by confession
.or 1852 and costs.
Liua Lourie VS. Peter Kimes. judy
ment TOR plaintiff, by default for 1924 :
Is with interest at per cent. and
costs.
Anna A. Shaarf VS. Gustav Shaarf.
Divorce granted and petitioner re.
turned 10 her maiden name OF Anna
"A. Miller.
Court appoint E. z. Hatfield and d.
Il. Lawrence to assist The Prosecuting
Attorney in examination OF annual
Report of Comm issiOnefs.
Ephraim +. Jaeger. Assignee VS.
VIM. A. Walker, ct al. Ordered aud
decrecd that lands described in petit
ton be appraised, land sod by Assigned
and make report OF Ills proceedings TO
this Court to abide its iurtber order
State VS. Theodore Burnett. 1ndict-
ment ter violation OF liquor law. De-
ienaaul entered into bon,;s i'll S4O0 for
his appearance at next term with 5.
&. Eldridge as surety,
George r Robinson VS. Perry Z,
Ddwley. Jury trial; verdict for
plaintiff for Sli36. Defendant files
motion for new trial which is over
ruled and Judgment entered On YER
dict.
Chauucy ii. Andrews, ct. al, VS. Geo
Earl, ct. al Court find due from Geo
Earl TO plaintiffs ,S65. go, and order tina
# same be not paid in Two days from
close of term, lands 10 be SOLD to pay
same, &c.
s. ID. Pitkin VS. g LII. Pi,kin. De
cree that ii sums found due TO Asbur
ID. Gurley, VIM. S. WhippY, Il. ID
Pnkin, premises be sold to satisfy the
same and costs, aud balance to become
due to said Whippy and &. ID. Pitkin
aud that from any residue there be re-
served $16S. 80 10 be paid TO Charles
w. Bean.
Sarah Warner VS. Seymour Strong,
ct. al. This was an issue at law TO ,ry
the validity OF the codicil to the last
will OF Clarina w. Garter, deceased.
The jury III the case returned a ver-
dict mat the said paper writing is the
last will OF the said decedent. Plain
tiT files motion for new trial which is
overruled. Plaintiff excerpts. Pain
t,ff nt kn,H n h,4
in SUN oil $500.
State rs Horace .. Hinckley. One
indictment tor keeping a room, anu
TWO indictments Tor selling liquor. On
the first he was sentenced to impris-
onment tor 20 days and fine OF $50 and
costs, and on the other two to fine o;
So in each and costs.
State VS. Barney McNellis. Indict-
ment for selling liquor. Sentenced to
pay fine of S25 aud COSTS.
State VS. Bernard Kinney. Indict-
ment Tor keeping room, and also for
selling liquor. Sentenced to Jail for
SO days and fine of $75 and costs in
former and SIS and costs in latter.
State vs. Sol. Osthemier. lndict-
nent for keeping room, and for sell
ing liquor. In first sentenced to ~
daya in Jail aud to pay fine OF via
and costs; in latter to pay fine OF SlO
and costs.
State VS. James II. Cooley. Indict-
ments for keeping room, for selling to
minor aud for selling. Iu first, SEN
fenced to 20 days in Jail to pay fine OF
$50 and costs in each OF the Others to
pay fine Of SO dollars and costs.
State VS. Henry Hilderhoof. Indict-
ment for selling liquor. Sentenced to
Jail for 20 days and TO pay fine OF
$40 and costs.
State vs Moses Bean. Indictment
for keeping room. Sentenced to Sc
days in Jail and to pay fac SIS and
costs.
State VS. Otto Sontum. Indictment
for keeping room, and also for selling
liquor. In former sentenced to e
days in Jail, TO pay fine of $50 and
costs, and in latter $40 and costs.
State VS. George Edwards. Indict.
ment for petit larceny. Defendant
sentenced to pay a fine OF $40 and costs
State VS. w. B. Lougshore. In;iict
ment for burglary aEd larceny. Sen
tencel to four years in penitcntiary
| and to pay costs.
In all the above cases the defend
ants entered 4 plea of guilty.