The New York herald., 1878-02-22
LAWYLRS AND CLIENTS.

Since June last there have been pcpdng In the Su-
perior Court the suits OF "Henry Langs VS.. George
Gehe and Philipp Fischer" and "Philipp fischer vs.
Henry Lange." Alawyer namod Theodore Won Brem.
sen appeared as attorney for Gehe aud Fischer in
both suits, and from tho beginning OF the suits was
successful on all the motions for and against his
clients. somo differences arose between Mr. Won
Bremsen and his clients in October last and the mat
Ter came before the Court a motion OF Gche and
Fischer through vedder Van DycK their attorney 10
remove him us their attorney OF record. Gehe made
l1hdavt stating, among other things, tnat within a
lew weeks serious G.rences had arisen between him
lnd Won Bremssn, which made it disastefui for him
10 have an interview with him. and that he did not
desire tO retain HIM his counse that Won Brcmsen
The order TO show cause was granted; tnal ho
then sent his bill, amounting TO $3.50, Tor services
rendered HIM and Fischer IN tho wnero
they are deiendants; that they both thought
The bill extortonate and asked 10 have II refer rcd
ihut the latter did not answer such request but wrote
sbusive letters 10 him, threatening TO horscwhp
him. similar affidavit was made by Fischer, wno
also asked TO have Mr. Won Bremsen removed Mr..
Won Bremsen, IN his opposing a1iJavit, said that
him u dcfcDd him; that Gene was very desrous to
have temporary Injunction removed, obtained by
10 pny him anything he might charge or his
That Gehe represeD that would inherit large Tor
tune from his mother IN Germauy, IRON whom lao ex-
pected remtMnce oil 900 or $4,000 within n
month from that date, and that no would be able 10 pay
all expenses ana costs out OF his own means; tnat
relying upon these represcn tations, ne agreed 10
defend Gehe; that when successful in vacaliug the
injunction Gehe was overJoyed anu asked nun out TO
de, representing the horses Carriage TO DO b,s
0wp Mr. Won Bromsen stated, furtncr. tnat he CON
tiDued TO ADVISE Gehc anu Fischer about their suit
That thereafter he was retained by Fischer to bling an
action against Lange Tor the recovery nall iuteres
Ia patent which he claimed To be worth 81 600 OU0
that Fische~ maze promises TO pay similar TO Gene: :
that brought said action and succcs sstu: that
he been compensated BY either anu that they
were conspIrng 10 cnta him out oi his pay. In con-
cIuson Sir. Won Brensen said tnat If his
c,lents would pay him he would retire from
The suits Judge Frecdman rendered a decision
denying the application to remove him. Tho appIca
ton WAS renewed ana Mr. Edward Mackinley for Tho
motion argued that cont mad the right 70 cnanqo
his attorney when he pleased and be further insisted
that nothing was owing to NE Won Brcmsen. On the
contrary Mr. Won Bromsen claimed that they had
shown no good for bis removni thai thoy owed
him large sums Of money tor his scrvices; and he
asked that reference be ordered by the Court a.
certain the fscs the matter. The Court appointed
John W. Van Hoesen as reieree. lhe hearing before
the referee resulted In report in iuvor OF Mr. Won
bremscn, he hndiug that 800 ~ due 10 Mr.. Won
bremsen by Gene anu Fischer professional
rcnoered them IN such actions, IN addition 10 any sum
r sums heretofore paid him. The releree's report
ses YESTERDAY confirmed with order that, upon pay
ment oi costs and expenses Of the reference and
blssV iound DUE substitution Of Attorney would be
ordered ana not otherwise