The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-06-23

s e sssa ss ., an -. o.
~ nss what IA. become O TINT paper if we can gel
Nv avn Impression IA that il was secured ~ u.
pa, m ana ,a, PLAYED az ,s
can graecn's any aeass n rsgars g = d. So "a. set
attempt snYttn Tor God's sake do il af Loui
Msss me e"a r.. ,v. tor Yea yen 90 no..
neuhwssl II you Grifu tell him he will
JAMES T. ANDERSON.
PHOTOGRAPHED on HER BRAS.
q. Didn't you 90 TO see Mr. Weber to get the 80
called sherman letter? A. Most assuredly not;
present tod AudcrsoDs letter stating that be wanted
ms documents tha.sai never thought OF the shsr.
q Did you ever see this sherman letter or a copy
OF 1t aiterwardY A. saw 1t in Inc newspapers ana
bcsices. II was photographed on my brain; never
saw any written copy OF n; asked Anderson for
copy refresh my memory aud TO see II that as ths
real document that ne wanted aud no SAID tho copy
Was Ia tue hands OF sypncr and could not be got.
WHAT CHANDLER SAID.
q. Do you know W.iiam Il. Chandler? A. l have
O. DID hc furnish you With copy OF tho so-called
never gave u 20 me; he read something aud told
him thought u WAS pretty near the original
thu so-cailcd Sherman letter. A. No. decidedly not
q Then ne Is mistaken u he says sof A. Yes, sir;
Q. Have you 90 copy OF that sherman letter about
you Of any kincs a No SIR; no written copy OF any
q. Yoa did not converse with Chandler a. to where
tho sherman lcttsr was2 A. No, SIR; no said he did
not think TO expression, "thnt John Sherman
would writc sucn a document
q AZ that timc no copy OF the letter had been pub
iished2 A. Not that know Of; had not seen II -
q What did you say TO Mr. Chandler ~ 20 whsrs
tho original wass do not remember.
Mr.. MATHEWS AGAIN.
a. 1 understood you TO say tnat you had two OF
three interviews with Mr. Matthew'S. A. Yes. SIR.
q What were they about? A. Anderson had sent
many lying postal cards OF now he was streeing'
Matthews, &c, that thought would ask Mr. Mat
nd m
toned the letter and no said he had not which
very glad to hear a. me time because 'noush'
q 1t was in regard TO The Sherman lettor that you
went TO SEQ Matthcwsg A. Yes, sir; asked him ne
had ever heard OF such thing.
Q Why did you want to nnd out If Matthews had
heard Of tho sherman letter. a. Because Anderson
said no had been chasing him all over Ohio.
z. Had he been chasing INN tho Sherman letter.
A. do not know whether !. was that or not
other letter except the sherman letter. A. That
all; Anderson claimed to have great many letters
from Mr. Matthews and. In his ESTIMATION, he could
Q. You to 500 Mt. Matthews three times. you
q About the sherman letter. A. No, sir; 1 spoke
10 Mr. Matthews but once regards that letter. I
asked him II Anderson had ever mentioned TO him
SUCH document and he SAID NO, ana was then SAT-
islcd
Q. Why did you go TO Mr. Matthewss A. Because
Anderson had In some manner implicated him
throughout this matter
q 30 you remember how long that was after you
came TO Washingtony A. II WAS the Same day that
spoke to Mr. Darrell, before received that letter
from Anderson which took TO tho Treasury Depart
mont. and which Was about tho last OF January.
q. What were tho other interviews with Matthews
about? A. About political matters.
Q. There was quite hight expected in tho Senate In
case Packard's name was 80 Il INF A. cannot say
! was not In ihe ring ant was not Interested.
q You took no part In the fight? A. Not particu-
larry; yet never away from light.
the committee at hvo O'Clock 4. NJ. then adjourned
until Monday morning at ten O'Clock.
SUBCOMMITTEE TO START ron LOUISIANA.
p,t,c
ing OF Mcssrs. Stcnacr Blackburn Reed vii START
for Louisiana on Tuesday noxt.