New-York tribune., 1878-11-05
IENIrED sTATEs SrPREME COURT.

i WASHINGTON, Nov 4.-The following business
I Dnf q Memphis, Team admitted practice; ~
Th0Tae sneli q a PLAINTIFFS IN erT9r agt nc AtSnne
iToT taS cT'H a GSgr St the o. Tnsa NE ta a. II the re
fersea win costs and cause renAnae With aeeOhs 10
sl Justoe fisrisn delivered be o. no Ths sctcn was
Instituted 70 reetn certain policy Oh Insurance egYcng
lan agreement entered iutO previous to the issue Of
!. oy Is the hS Ssrst nenasa o &c nsaTeG hs
g. S @ dorS. Sss d a ns y SSf@[' a !. be
So erias q lie pSicy OILY Keiih individual vas
Or Co are nntsa 70 have lso Pocy rsiormed 80 o. T.
tIe coninaats ae EMIT cd 70 policy rriorned
correspond vi The original agraement No lWaSh
S ss saprsSe CoaPt Of Sn med
al oott bufssd by James saro under orders from lie
southern e1ry as5Ao'ties can reeSySr iola sad deerd
Oeore jury verdict was re ed for lhe descendant Uron
2s a9 tass % S en- PSs way 14aS 70 re
lcO;t0n un or the oydes military u
houes IN order 10 prevent from falling into The hsns Of
ar Tor Whc person executing such ptary was
sg ta o S.nsa Mt JSsSs GaoT dsTs ed eg @G
Iring optsiu5. 30, So-Eugoys nOw!ano aypeaHt act.
i conrs Of Tie UEod staiss for tas Ess Disrclof Wis
tTsred tbs spsiSa Ne sOi-Ths UDitsi sistss paipIr
se sss s icT tSs sSatera Tis.re Of New y - he
s case nvyes .se rgst Of soc hector Of Cnston' at
ndcr iEtrge,ious rOm the seoresy Of e Treasury
ond not % 4ad s9y gortn1 Of hs ero q said yeso
ov 20 be landed BY his agents "itn The ies OF the in.
iu stSs OF Pe5ms U - ee used 20 give ad AID
@iort 70 sons s rs6eion sgainI iso Government Of
below was IN dlreogg verdict i9r ne defendant,
Ia ins5rustions tssScd ~ tss seoreSsiy Of iSs tS
hTessaTg uSasr the Ss ssetlon Of The ket Of Mag
ss susiscl q sait The Judgment oi IT,
inIther grOoeeesg' Mr. Jusncs Bradley Delivered ,he
ses e,S RSa SS No suSStjta1eS ~, ws TSo5. 1RpSn
SSto 4 ssuts CSI0as ~1sis GuTncy couity
rcut o. me United states for the DSic Of south
C 30 coafST SSS h9S 10 sf ess 9Ig 915 rs Is
as3g levy te5 fer retiring certain eeTsihcses Of
sesse Om fetusng receive the same Tor taxes
G The Court no Gnoston proseiei erey an sbs.rSci one
IN TIC I shows 10 sqniiy in tas eoSsglSuant i Is there
flnjuaieo % the eompaAlaeal's night 70 bring and
s';s:' Sa sSas rAfa sa De In SSeSiGS %
e. al sSss sypoisSt, al 5ahnsou aod
G & s c sgyeS u % s5 1 Sog5e o. aT qnssa
Ved cause remanded for further p;eesdiass IN conformity
H. oielss No aSssmuSi G. CSek pIasiiG "a cTfor agt
CSH9syss''h Of lSs9sy.yses ma, error 70 The
cause Ie1gsos y pay tAs TAX iOr Which be yas ha9e
Ne sInsl aol Gpd ,or the account Of fhe
Sporsfs IN ne s.S 70 wS,Ss laaspsDi rSs Teldersd
aaca hssi the Esuna tast the statutes author zng
it.e,s m u The CcnsSsusa o. the United sists The
' = & & az Il iSs s s1 S1 Ss Pa sT an M5a @
rguiisn n ess Esre iordae y lhe Constitution Of the
yy = seoie rsyersd sa4 she ease Tsmsnaed 70 that
ouin!Ba No S5-FmersOn q. OTVLA appellant agL
1 thrn P0ae !: appeal hom the Circuit Court ~ the
Cuiisa for The Northern Dis,rct of Illinois Decree
neA rxCoTt far u tails - provide for the redemption
sale Of zach pascel Of snd proTido by the statute
nos aut cause renanoeo With Cire lions 10 amend the
dcrto y mnkh,g an order fJr such redemption 70 De
ilf ~ gsee Nr. Justice Miller delivered the opinion.
No S7fooFn p Work, appellant G0OrRe f. Lcathers.
"a Pe .s,a tlis Ccus GOnr OF the United states tor
1tr.ct 0f LC Decree affirmed with M Jus
al apgoauts ag John T. Helms administrator etG-Ap-
tho Circuit Court OF states of the
Gide District Of TenAeees DeeTeereVesed costs and
sBded Wlh dlreciOna ~ dismiss the hill MT Jus
Ss csd ssiTeSsS ,he sFnSs We o yss The Ss'FOPo
he Cupnosiieag Mutual L.fs Insurance Co Appeal
om the circuit Count 81 tbe United ststes for the Northern
District 90 Illinois Decrce OF August H. 10, confirming
much of decree Of February H. 1870 directs
that made eecsrdance with the pracrce Of the
81 February 1915 Il affirmed aud remaDded with in.
sueten 10 "a aside the land modify original decree
Nalng Tor redemption from In accordance with the
" hbo.s Cosis " DO paid BY appellee The Chief
~ ,eehsersd the opinion No s4-The Balumore
nssn VS h hAi,FoAd Company plaintiffs IN errof Agt
plsulct l W Oonnbia Judgment aflIned with costs
~ s9u.t Decision announced BY the Chief Jusce.
80 DpS - n Meyer eRo William ustesa ETC.,
~ stt"I agh Me Delaware Raiiroad Construction
4 SSo1pahl no eO3-Wnisn Dennis0n and L. n. Meyer,
ke elh-Wllism De1nisn8 ana Il H. NsTsT tfustsss etc
tants ~ errer a Bsniaun and SArsk kurOh sdr MS
ota go Motions 30 Gtarn and 6siss ssbmisted by M
ssegs g Nrishs and Mf. ]. NJ 1raytos II
ssyort ef thS samo, and ey Mr. Jsnss 3raSt
III h rele Mas announced There msy he npiled via
3a y aisDiss .nt Sf error or appeal Faotion A.
1"a On TIE poans tha4 AtAOush tss Hoord nag uisT