The New York herald., 1878-01-10
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBRHs.
Rv Tudoa RnrrNit

BY judge Barrott.
days notice OF settlement OF order.
Freiberg vs.. Brangan.-The point Is we'll taken ana
the surety must rejected.
In the matter OF Lazarus Morris, Perfected Spec
taclc and Eye Glass Company.-Prayer OF petitioner
granted.
English VS.. Hurtford Accident Association Com.
pany.-Motion granted for third Friday
Carroll vs. Undernili.-Granled Tor the second Fri
day.
Tho Mayor, &c, VS.. Barton.-Injunction continued,
with $40 costs.
Worthington vs.. Davenport L--Complalnt dismissed,
with costs and $40 costs Of motion.
Thaycr, ct al vs. Flash ct al--Motion to CONTINUE
injunction granted, with $1O COSTS.
Butler va Bradiey.-Motion granted
Walsh vs.. Garrard.-Allowance liked aud judgment
Ayers VS. Ayera-Monon for recover denied, without
costs.
Notion granted SO far as to drecta sale of the prop
er.y, but do not feel justified In directing 70 be
sold in tho manner indicated.
Boas VS.. julia Appeal dismissed.
Dlon vs.. CockoroiI-Motion for security for costs
granted.
proof and report with opinion OF tho referee.
We'll va FraisheE-Answer Overruled as frivolous
and judgment accordingly, with costs
Norwood va Trask.-rhe plaintin must tako writ
Beiand VS. H,ld-piaiutir can take an order for tho
appointment oi q receiver.
IRWIN va Barker.-The answer Is adjudged to be
frivolous and judgment accordingly thereon for the
plaintiff, with COSTS.
Price vs.. Price et aL-Section 1,012 seems to CON-
template consent in such case only, leaving tho
careful review Of all The sections of tho Code
upon the subject and case cited u Cairnes, 252)
think the order should be granted.
Roberts va MorehVuse.-rhe equity Of this motion
10 that Baldwin should the palnti las Compton's
assgnec) out Of his hall Il would be grossly unjust
II tho result Of all this bo to deprive Morenousc and
Dudley Of their entire recovery with an additional
liability. All OF II is TO go to counsel However, II
this present suit and the deposit authorized, tho
Court powcrIcss to ala them but think that ques
should be closely scrutnIzed, with view, pos
slbie, 10 substantial justice. will, therefore, direct
reference 10 Mr.. Elliott +. sheppard TO take proof
the matters charged In the moving pabcrs when
the witnesses be examined and cross exam, ned
before him) and to report, with his OPINION. Unul
the final decision the stay must be continued.
Deverna vs.. HolelL- Memorandum.
Hatten VS.. SmIih.-Seo MON orandum.
johnson va. Honinan.-Motion denied, with costs.
Hewitt Dewey.-M0ton denied Sec momoran.
CorteIyon vs. Muloch.-Grantcd. Charles Prico
Chaiter,on VS. Taylor.-Motl granted, pnloss tho
case Is presented 10 be settled and printed.
by Judge Brady.
Campbell VS.. Spratt-Order settled.
Scigsborg VS.. Oumer, and the matter OF Durfee,
lunat,c.-Iranted.
Tho Manhattan Life Insurance Company VS..
Hcnzei et al.-Order framing Issues sctted
Gainsiorth vs. Gainslorth.--l 500 reason
change the result expressed by within opinion
BY Judge Lawrence.
Hardt VS.. Otis -Graned. The order does not ap-
pear to DO with the papers
LinDeman vs.. Gus; Duden VS.. Lagrave; De GrciG
vs. Otis. and Hemscy vs. otis.-Grantcd
SUPREME coURT-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Lawrence.
Mitchell VS.. Read.-l do not see how 1t can DO
doubted that this case is difficult aud cxtraord nary
(Code, sec 800; Duncan DE WItt Hun, 1874;
Conn w. Coke. Hun, 6l0 The painful in my
opinion entitled to allowance OF 0vc per cent
upon tho amount oil the recovery, and such viii DO
tho order
COMMON PLEAS GENERAL TERN.
BY Judge j. +. DiIy
Hunt and another VS.. C0ligan.--Judgment reversed:
new trial ordered, with costa To abide event.
COMMON PLEAs-CHAMBERs.
BY Judge j. f. Daily.
Henry VS.. Fotans sMotion for taxation OF costs dc.
med. See memorandum.
Tho People cx rel Gales VS.. Observation-Disclosures
denied, with COSTS. See opinou
Wolf Va. .Whnc.-Appication for discharge denied,
with $40 costs. soc memorandum
Shaughnessy Vi. Van neutrality-suspicious. granted.
No Gusts
sackett VS.. Krommelbein.-Atracnm IN ent granted
BailaDo In $3.50
Deutsch vs. Eaean.-Motion denied. See opinion.
Wooster vs.. Forty second street and Grand Street
Railroad Company.-Motion granted on terms, SEQ
decision with Clerk.
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPECIAL TERM
by Judge Spcr.
In tho matter OF tho petition OF Andrews Order
appointing Hannah W. Andrews guardian al Ltem of
Elizabeth b. Andrews, an infant
In the matter Of the petition of wurcz-Ordcr ap-
orick Wurez, an infant
Schneider VS.. Brondy ct aL-Ordered on day calon-
dar Tor tho 9th OF February
Wright VS. Huggins. Order declaring plaintiffs
Abandoned.
keyser Va. Nortn.-Appcation denied.
Brady VS.. Grove; Becker VI. Wodneyer: Marshall
ct al vs. Dubois; Arnoii vs. Conner; Armstrong VS.
Fogg; Schmidt W.. kcitncr; Lucs W.. Morrison Cor.
man VS.. EhIers; Towman Trcaver Orders
granted.
BY Judge Sedgwick.
Winfield vs. Copperman. Order settled.
MARINE CoUET-sPEoIAL TERM.
BY Judae sheridan
Richards vs. schultz; Fltzsimmons VS.. Miller:
Kocbler vs. flanagan; Brewster Taylor; Waters
vs.. Rooney; Sach Vs. lnicid.-M otions granted,
Fox vs.. Packcr.-Motion granted as per oraor
I.Ltell vs. Woodworth; Mark vs. BIoch.-Mot,ons
denied, with $40 costs
Mincshu.ky vs.. Dcneng. Motion denied. Defend,
ant can have early tria upon short notice.
Gilman vs. Experimentation for commission
granted.
Lozano va. Dooling.-spcncer C. Muslin appointed
receiver.
CASTER VS. Smith.-Bpnd cancelled
Edred Poznunski Cause restored to calendar.
McCaferiy vs.. McDOnaid.--Moton Tor leave to soil
pro cry as pcrlshnuc dcniud, Dut cause set down Tor
trinl 10 Part ] for Ja0uary 10. 1873
Connolly VS. Doizci; Barron vs.. Corwm; Louis VS..
| L,s..l fIa...2 In.