The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1878-03-22

BY 1Ias sS Tor
On hs . the pa5o. again me. at
Tor three notes Tor $1,000 Tor sla.5oo which
hsys Ssf . Sa ss4 9~s o @ ." which "
In much being proved the plaintiff IN order to avoid
show that tie settlement and receipt were obtained
fraudulent rep II also suggested that
proof falls quite short of law, avail
met acaS the "ots oP hrss
ena u S &c ss sseosa H
trary, it Was tactly confirmed and ratified.
II appears in evidence that the defendant said at the
time o, that he had paid TO one Barber
.,on IN which Inc plaintiff was AMI the Si2 800
count cash for the money so paid The plaintiff
this ss.ss a p ns By Ss ss s, s
curing the appropriation referred CO. and the plaintiff
as
tie as s's ana ne n sb 3. CLANS the
cover the balance which would be due him on the account If
BY making this claim the plaintiff invites me into field
duty OF going into the inquiry so far at least as to "scer
party ns he is
.as G but to the ss s.n s
in transaction the plaintiff familiar principles
in such matter the defendant may have been
81 puee pssy su.s S s' n's.
Ito rights growing out OF illegal transactions between
he tho
an innocent PARTY so as to be entitled to relieir
The following appeared Ia evidsnes which directly
G s ,Ss As's 81 tn. s
oAny, and .hs plaintiff was commissioner tor build.
s Of sS" hs dendan IN tho tho
n as rn of % s%s ss
be expended by that eomnisson and that would
that amount to him MS large amount oil money had
through" The paint cxpres.ed no dissent to this ar
rangement both parties understanding that the fifteen
!hr.ush The Iess..uis appropriation that tie
large extent corrnp,y up among the commission
sfs and Other Assoeia,ss On the LIN 81 ApT ISL
builiing of the Court House; The bill passed the
1R IL % es ses 10Y 81 s Is 1 h
100000 which in the foregoing charged by
IN regard TO it ind that rven in pursuance Of the
cent for the amount inserted In the bill for building tho
JUSTICE WILL NOT HELP CRIMINALS
New IL il we're clear .h. Tweed w.I guty of the false
hood aa n yet to ns b y
II his Sshs to 1esys him from tho opsrAtoa Of
II appears BY tue plaintiffs disclosure tho
n Sa III. ns s s sSs
1872 coniode with each other with others
ssy sa % as ss
as s c :sd
parcel Of the corrupt rss.aet:a o, these
Of fraudulent and eornpt de.linxs between them.
The Defendant says 30 the plaintiff have pad S1I 800
20 bill through the Legislature Tor yr benefit and
have charged that amount to Tbs plaintiff
pays tho money allows th. charge Ia sestlsnen
The law viii not give the plaintiff relief however untrue
the representations may be- The law saw to him. You
paid money allowed the charge upon Tweed's state
ment that he had committed vie erin tor your benefit
anil tbe law cannot give relis that
the crime Was not 0ommittea.
wRo MONEY!
But inasmuch as the paioH has maniested good al
OF curiosity know what became oil that $1,000 which
went to Albany on the 18th OF April 1871 aud namnch
both parties sent counsel to ithaca to light hat
question: feel bound to take some notice OF tins issue o
fact whether Tweed did did the i 500
III brDing members to for the Court House app.opr
ton The plaintiff credit the defend IS
IL actually used. and tue settlement made
cordingy II now the plaintiff would he relieved from the
operation OF that settlement the burden OF proof Is
him show that the fendtnt's assertion
false. Tho plaintiff full credit t. Tweeds state
mcnt and until the proved do the same
The proof does not satisfy that the statement
truo, though admit there some grounds doubt.
BARRIERS deposition not to mind very satisfactory
1t could hardly he expected OF him that he
would make admission that he had used the
corrupt the Legislature. Exactly what became OF the
Sll2,5OO involved Ia mystery. feel under obga
ton this matter further than have alre
done. In report have allowed to the plantin the
balance due the $4,000 wit. So 1Sl U3-and
have disaowed the other claims of the plaintiff
OklGEN ). SEYMOUR, Committee.
Lire urch