National Republican., 1878-05-29
The DisirIct Cnurfs.

sUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT.
United States VS.. Brooks & Dangerfeld; judg,
ment below affirmed. United States VS. HOLES 4
Allison; argued and submitted. United States vs.
Stewart; Judgment below affirmed. United States
vs.. Lippincott; remanded to the Criminal Court,
IN Of George Robinson hdJeas corpus appeal dis
missed.
CIRCUIT CoURT-JUsTICE HUMPHREYS.
suddarth vs.. stclls ct al; verdict for defendant
Doneho W.. Nandcnburg; Judgment set aside. sui.
livan vs.. Smith 4 Bell order OF sale. Howard VS..
Carpenter; verdict for plaintiff against Mrs. Cur
pentcr. Virginia N. Taylor, admimstratrix, VS.
Albert Gleason; judgment by default Oge VS..
Bland; verdict for plaintiff for s7S Gmnguard 4
Schneider vs. GeOrse verdict for plaintih for SIS
Gregory \ Son VS.. De ChRmbrun; Judgment set
aside. Mcdaniel vs.. Owens: suit discontinued
Walsh vs. Walsh Judgment for defendant. Keyscr
vs.. MuhlhRfcr; verdict for plaintiff for $40. Whit
takcr VS.. Cox referred ia J. J. johnson. laughlir
4 Murray VS.. Woodward; settled. skinner &
skinner w. Snnmaker; on hearing
ASSIGNMENTS FOR TO-DAY.
Supreme Court of the District-No i2ilI, George.
town College vs.. District Of Columbia; No. c. +. g.
" T. Co. vs. Maxwell; No. d, Bowling vs.. liOuchcr
No. 81, BurGnd A. j.. estate of; No 60, Wiley vs.
strong No. iO strong vs. WILEY No, o., dunbar
~. ERrhart vs. Smith; No. 73, Moran vs.. Tyler
No. -, Harris vs.. Johnson
Circuit Court--Justice IIumphrcys-No. 2i3
kes ys wNH%diipP; No a, hGeld VS. M!IaWs Ns
10 Grady VS.. Connor; No. 2iS, Nash VS.. Inland and
SeabOard Coasthg Company; No. 80, White VS..
Downing No. 81, Kelley VS. Downing; No. 26O
BCnn vs.. A. and y. r. r. Co.; No. 2Gl, sullivan VS..
barry; No. 26S, Washington building and Manu-
featuring Company vs.. Spear; No. 273, Frcund vs..
Cobb No 217, douglass VI. Lee; No. rs CUllAn ".
Fmhcrty; No. ~ Walker vs.. Kuhn, gNruishCc
No. 2SD Wall ". Spencer; No. "hl Edwards n Co.
ys. Lyons: No. Is! Granshqw, vs.. Brooks; No. ?S5
james X iulChins vs.. CrHndull No. 2Si, douglass
VS.. Thompson; No. 2ss Murphy vs.. MNtock.
PROBATE COURT-JUsTICE oLIN
m will of JOHN Clark remuneration Of James
OF cdICTt IN W will ul Emo, q. EUll dcgcRscd
proof Of publication filed and proven by two Wit.
ncsscs. In t John W. Wade, guardian to james
II. ShrcNc; petition Of gua dian for authority 10
advance funds To ward filed. Last will aud testa-
meut of Henry u. WissnCr, deceased, filed. win
Of Thomas U'Dca, deceased, fully proven and ad.
mitlcd to probate; executions gave bond In 500,
Last will aud testament Of Ellen 4. Parker, do
ceased, fully proven and admitted To probate; cN-
rCutOr gave bond In S2.0O. VIII Of William Wash.
iugton IrCcktOr deceased, fully proven ard Gd-
nittcd 10 probate; bond Of administrator and Will
annexed, Sl,OO Ia ~ Adelaide J. Brown, guar.
diam decree discharging and releasing Of sureties
on hOnd &c Last VIII and testament Of Charles
ton issued. The case OF the will Ol the late Ad-
mirl Alden IN which 1t Is sought to establish the
dumiCC ui the tCslutur IN this District. was argued
by Mr.. f. T. Il. sands, Of counsel for petitioners,
aud Mr. Walter :. Cox, counsel for respondent aud
will he concluded tu.dUy by Mr.. Apprby, when the
case will he submitted tor decision. 1t i Of interest
10 urmy and navy officers, whose dOmicllc ID indie
terminate
Court adjourned at ten Il N. to-day.