The Emporia news. [volume] (Emporia, Kan.) 1859-1881, 1878-10-04
COURT PROCEEDINGS.

State VS.. Henry Wright and Bert Shaw
-Sterry & Sedgwick for prosecution,
Buck s. Kellogg for defense. Verdict OF
jury, not guilty.
State VS.. Frank Gatewood-Sterry G.
Sedgwick prosecuting, Ruggles, Scott &
Lynn for defense Sept 8, plea of guilty
and sentence six months in the county
Jail.
State VS.. John Cupp-Sterry & Sedg
wick for state, w. A. Randolph for de
Tense. Cause continued till next term on
motion of state. Defendant required to
give recognizance in the sum of 5000.
Thomas Golden VS.. L. B. JudsOn-
Sterry & Sedgwick for plaintiff, c. B
Bachelor for defense. Sept. 10, dismiss
ed by plaintiff without prejudice; judg
ment for defendant for costs.
CT Conlzlin & j. G. Ames VS.. School,
District 37-Buck & Kellogg for plain
tiff, Sterry g. Sedgwick for defense
Trial by jury and verdict for defendant
L. E. Spicer VS.. J. c.. Hall & Bro.,-
Sterry & Sedgwick for plaintiff. Passed
Daniel Rich vs.. A T. & s. F. r. r. Co
-Sterry s. Sedgwick-Burns & Waters
Settled.
Adam Wenger VS.. A. d. Chambers et
al.-Cunningham & McCarty. Judg
ment by default against defendant, J. NJ
Welsh.
Lewis Kemp VS.. G. b. Kemp-Dis
missed af cost IF nlaintiH Nunninohar,
& McCarty.
d. w. Reiff VS.. Victoria Reif-Mo
ton to suppress plaintiffs deposition,
and leave given plaintiff to return same
for correction.
Sarah Morgan VS.. Vim. Evans-Sterry
& Sedgwick for plaintiff, w. A. Ran
dOlph for defense. Tried by jury and
verdict for plaintiff, $500.
Noah Lofiand VS.. Maggie Lohand-
Cunningham & McCarty for plaintiff
Decree granted divorcing parties.
J. w. Spinning VS.. Ryan & Conner
w. A. Randolph, Sterry Sc Sedgwick.
Dismissed.
Lucy Smith VS.. Eli Hinshaw-for
partition-Sterry & Sedgwick for plain
tiff, E. G.. Nichols, T. johnson and John
Bay appointed to make partition of
premises.
John S. Lockwood VS.. Smith-Gillett
81 Forde for plaintiff. Judgment by
default, and plaintiff to pay costs.
G. S. Gilman VS.. w. T. Stone-Gillett
& Forde. r. M. Bachelor appointed
guardian ad Item, for minor defendants.
A. Gillett VS.. unknown heirs of Ed
ward Hayes, and against Edward Hayes
and John Russell. Judgment by default
Robt. johnson VS.. Alexander Rennick
ct al. Judgment by default
A. Gillet VS.. Wilson Hunter. Judg-
ment by default.
A. Gillet VS.. unknown heirs of d.
Knox. Judgment by default.
Chas. L. Flint VS.. Isaac N. East-Gil-
lett & Forde for plaintiff. Judgment by
default.
Charles L. Flint VS.. Thomas H. Brou-
CHAM. Judgment by default.
Charles L. Flintvs. Warren K Bower.
Judgment by default.
Charles L. Flint VS.. Ed. Russell & L.
d. Bailey. Judgment by default.
Chas. L. Flint VS.. Zerah Castle ct al.
Judgment by default
Chas. L. Flint vs. John. L. Thomlin ct
al. Judgment by default.
Moody Currier VS.. Samuel E. Wies-
bach-E. S. Waterbury for plaintiff.
Judgment by default for 1,55595, and
c. II. Carswell appointed receiver.
s. p. Burris VS.. Jas. Boswell ct. al
Sterry & Sedgwick for plaintiff, default,
set aside, and case continued to next
term.
White Sewing Machine Co. VS.. Sc. G..
Holt-Gillett 81 Forde. Judgment by
default.
Austin Corbin VS.. the Board of County
Commissioners. s. Waterbury for
plaintiff, Sterry & Sedgwick for defense.
Sept. IL, Judgment by default. Sept. 10,
demurrer to petition overruled and ex-
cepted to by defendant.
A. H. Holmes VS.. Joseph and Polly
Brown-Sterry & Sedgwick for plaintiff.
Former judgment set aside and new tri-
al granted.
j. X. o. Sherwood VS.. Christina Chan.
man ct ALL. S. Waterbury for plain
tiff. Sept. IL, on motion Carswen ap-
pointed receiver.
Emporia Mutual Loan Association VS.
Geo. Rice ct al. Sheriff ordered to
make deed to purchaser at sheriff's sale
E. r. Holderman vs. Mark Patty ct al
-Gillett & Forde, Sterry & Sedgwick
Sheriffs sale confirmed.
G. w. Stoker VS.. Union Trust Co.
Continued by consent to next term. Ster
~ & Sedgwick for plaintiff, Kelso fol-
defense.
State of Kansas VS.. Henry Wright
Sterry & Sedgwick prosecuting, Buck 6
Kellogg for defense. Sept. 16-Arraign
ment waived, and plea of not guilt,
entered. Sept. 2O-Trial by jury anC
verdict of guilty of petty larceny. Sept
S3-Sentence, six months in county TAI
and fine of 800.
Gillett & Forde VS.. NJ. F. Merrick. as
signee of c. E. Kelsey, ct al.-Sterry 6
Sedgwick for defense. Sept. 24-Motior
TO make answer of defendant more def
mite and certain, overruled and excepted
to. Leave given plaintiff to answer in
stGnter.
Mary L. Hall VS.. VIM. McCoy-Ster
~ d Sedgwick for plaintiff, Rogers 8
Sanford for defense. Removed to fed
eral court.
Jos. Rickabaugn VS.. ]. A. Finley
Sterry & Sedgwick far prosecution, Bucl
& Kellogg for defense. Trial by iur,
and verdict for plaintiff.
School district 80 VS.. Carl Scheel ana
VIM. Scheel-Sterry and Sedgwick fo
plaintiff, Buck s. Kellogg for defense
continued by consent.
David Stack VS.. VIM. Graffenstein-
Ruggles, Scott & Lynn for prosecution
F. e. Smith for defense. Plaintiff
claim settled and defendant to nav costs
p. B. Plumb VS.. @. ]. Wright, ct al
Sterry s. Sedgwick for prosecution, Gun
ningham & McCarty and Gillett & Ford,
for defense. Present sheriff ordered 4,
make deed to premises heretofore SOLD
by Sheriff Conner.
State of Kansas VS.. John w. Stephen
IT. N Sedgwick for state, Z. w. Gun