The state rights democrat. [volume] (Albany, Linn County, Oregon) 1865-1900, 1878-10-25
Clreul. cour. DoeLst.

tho 1lEculb NOurt Ior Linn county, Wnlch
convenes next Monday
State Of Oregon W. Eli Pettyiohn--in
dlctment for larceny.
A McCalley set al va b w Cundiff
in equity TO recover dover.
A McCalley OF al vs j L iIill--suit in
equity 10 recover dover
| 4 A McCalley ct al VI Eli & E n NJ Car
ter-svit in equity to recover dover.
o A MoCalley OF 81 vs. X Q Hill-suit la
equity TO recover dover.
A MoGalley % IL W. j II Bnrkhart-auit
/ In equity to recover dover.
A MeCalley ct al VI q i Simpson suit
10 equity TO recover dover.
A McCalley ct al Va Elizabeth Ritter
suit in equity to recover dover.
A MeCalley OF nj w ] II Baltimore auit
In equity 10 recover dover.
10 A McCalley OF al vs. A II Baltimore
suit IN equsty to recover dover.
IL A McCalley ct al va James Elkina suit
in equity 10 recover dover.
IL A MoCalley ct al vs. Albany Farmers
Co-suit in equity 10 recover dover.
IL A McCalley et al vs. Phillip Baltimore
suit IN equity 10 recover dover II
IL A Me Galley ct al vs. Sophia Kruger
suit in equity to recover dover.
Is A MeCalley et al VI II A Irvine suit
| in equity TO recover dover.
10 Vincent Watson vs. w Smith ct al -
suit in equity.
II Board Of Commissioner va James Fri.
coming et Rl-injunetion.
IS Henry leasing w Jacob fluisehner--
action at law to recover money.
10 Duncan u Monteith vs. Thomas Mon
teith- suit for partition.
20 w II Dodd vs. q w Dawson -forelos.
ure suit.
81 Andrew PiekArd W William Mont.
| s,aa..,rts In aauffu "a aaeaetafu NttIa
% Frank ID Wood W Dayton Simiaon et
foreclosure suit.
% Al Parrish ct al W Z 8 sammcrs con.
iirmation Of report Of refarees.
% Jamcs b Houston vu EhAs + Canning.
ham confirmation Of report Of referees.
| % John Mckinney VI Thos Summers
20 VIM ] Thompson es sl We James +
Thompson Of al snit for partition.
q Jessie Turner VI Peter A Moses ct al
action on Judgment.
% /. Graf 4 Bro vs. Jacob Fleisehner ac-
tion at law 70 recover money.
% Martha HelIron W J X Herfon-action
at law TO recover specific personal property.
30 K Morrison vs II Herron action al
law 20 recover money.
81 Chester Keeney ct Al W. Elizabeth Q
Kesney % Al--suit in equity. N
30 ID LIE LuPaf vs. Martin l.uPer aai'
| Tor divorce.
IS w II Dodd W d w AllinghAn. ap.
peal. sss 8s4 -54s.5s-..s -se.-,
"a Seth s Hayes vs. David J Hayes et Al
Confirmation Of the ansnded report Of ref.
IS WA Paul vs. Fletcher CrAbtree- Suii
| for nlAnder
% in Myers " s Stafford action At lAu
TO recover money.
81 @ d simpson Va b A Herrold action
at law to recover money.
3S-Fox, Baum & Co W q Varksr- Ae
tion at law 10 recover money.
80 John Settle ~ n snideF- action At lAN
10 recover money.
20 Joseph z Bentlsy et al vs. Robecca I
JoAea-action for damages.
II Beard " s A Fanning- action 1t lAN
TO recover money.
- @ D simpson " Squire Duneah -actioI
at law to recover money.
- Franklin Davidson ct Al W q Settle
mier ct al action at Law to recover money
~ CASTOR. Furry 4 Co W J Il Mcclure
action at law 70 recover money.
IS + T T Fisher admr " Eugene Ulm-
action at law 10 recover money.
80 M G George VI + 5 Merrill ct al-actioI
a. law 10 recover nancy.
a7 ID III Conlsy W Emeline cheadle &C
tion at law 10 recover money.
IS Jonathan Waasom " l. Elkina et al
action at law to recover money.
80 b T Drake " II n CrAiie et Ai-aetioi
at law 70 recover money. -=s-
80 James A Pearl ys MAstersoa 4 Jack
action at law 70 recover money.
: 81 Geo b Teal 'vsJ q Mccoy asl'nr aotiol
at law to recover money.
90 Ruel Custer " William Montgomery
action at law 70 recover money.
50 d fFoman admr w James Riley 1t Al
action at law 70 recover money.
s. James G Junkins ~ Squire Duncan
action at law 10 recover money.
IS James 4 Porter va Il L Rhodes 4. J0na
Davis aetion nt lrs - recuyer money.
SO s Hayes admr Vs Tins barrett 81 \
action at law 70 recover money.
81 n u Carskaden ~ Ann y C4rsAadeH
Is Margaret Bizi vs Pm Dial-sait "a
divorce
80 Pauline Beard vs. Ambrose Beapi
, suit for divorce.
60 john T sssi.h. " M4rgAFet smith sui
81 W Kelly vs Melissa Kelly suit 70
divorce.
81 VII RobartA Va Mary ROborts sui
; for divorce
60 III Fem Va Eliza Fenn--suit for iii
vorce.
6i i;uel Custer vs. Martha NJ Custer-aui
J for divorce.
65 Christina jordan Va Arehelaas JorlaI
suit for divorce Jg1 Is sg
! GO Ruth A Smith vs. Alfred o Smith sui
J for divorce.
, 81 ER cheaalc Ys Raphael cheadle- spi
ss R cheAdle,v4 = Cheadle suit Tor d
! Yorce. -
50 Martha Dewitt ~ Thomas DeWitt
suit for divorce - y
20 Ludlow Maxwell vs. Mary Maxwell
suit for divorce.
r II Amy GOG VS. ThOs Goff-suit for d
Vorce.
70 Narcissa carOthers VI Geo w carOther
suit for divorce.
: 7s Frank Hayes ct al VS. 8 HAyes-sui
for partition.
! n William B Finley ya Frank Hayes ct {
specific performance Of contract.
Is Bennett w Poindextervs Ida A L Iced
ct al-suit to correct deed.
70 Albany Lodge No / o O = VS. Eliza
, Davis ct al-suit 70 correct deed.
al II NJ v Koontz vs. w Lakin ct al sui
5 in equity to reform and foreclose mortgag
7S Thos Richardson vs. james Ennis
: a1--suit to correct deed.
Q 70 VIM b Helm vs. B I Lollis -ejectmen
80 VIM 8 BFacker vs. James McMahon-
eiectment.
81 Alfred o Smith va Anon waddle-
: eiestment.
50 Newton Houston VS. Ashby Pearce ct
-ejectment.
: So James B Houston VS. Ashby Pearco
: al-ejectmeRt.
|. 81 'ThOs B Houston VS. Ashby PeArce et
-ejectment.
s. Milton Houston vs. Ashby Pearce ct
-ejectment
SO ] F Hendrix vs. Henrietta D Gore ct
foreclosure.
81 Geo II Liggett Va NJ snider--forecIo
sagw cosrer We n u16I.rs .for,elo