The New York herald., 1878-03-15
NEW YORK HERALD FRIDAY MARCH 15 ls7a-rR1PLE SHEET

q that when the Commissioner to revise the statutes
OF work. in their opinion. be conveniently
s@ Sers. s.s' they may submit the same 70 the Leg
4 r" sh ss ssss
70 that poy.oa The 0Gm%i,.onsrs 70 revise
aud the firm Of pin CONSISTING Of ,hirtssn chapters
work which may in their opinion ~ conveniently and
snaeted togsihr into one law before the
GLAZING pLrfcrs =. N rHn r CODE ,,,..,. ..
that petitions and suggestions sa,nersd in e favor
% 70 III sss sy s
discussions of this ADM. that Il passed n must be a
Sss 70 T. "adss ns I'd . TO
@ To the wsss sas s ias
is imgeectons but believed their correction was
attain this end. the scanty Time snatched from
Senatorial duties they made nearly three hundred
better the errors Of could be
totally The Of THIS
aon e the S Sm
able 60 put It In any shape ht Tor adoption snd
As particular objections note:-
ol % S nss Un s or o. H
name although at time of the conveyance under
o sAe ss s
sss %o by sna.. ns
u"as 'h: swe'paS sse'iSV ON
the Revised Statutes will be loose upon the community
sts Gssd Of estate 70 which the san,o Hss
shadow OF ~ claim, ana that pretended title to com
ncnden:y and then MAKE oner less figure
opinion as to his title or to dismiss the complaint
property concerned be very valuable As Is generally tho
actions by IRRESPONSIBLE swindlers The
ns %sns IL ss the revised 70
The State then left In the anomalous position Of dee,A
pos session is crime in eye the yet that
w % "' Il Is yoa that his seco" the door to
assault the title OF every real estate owner
A SOURCE OF LITIGATION
lar provision for what called "an action
chae" This is long and clumsy substitute TOR the com
the % s. .s
s,on and cviacnoss sbt il apparent there
far less comprehcnsvo than the action of the old
present. %sss s "Gf fSs evssd
this wise and limitation OF every day
FROM from tho objections Of the action
ITSELF tho proceednss ~ y IRE IN ~ @
plant . ,...n.v,u,vn
The third subdivision Of section 800 provides that ian
be granted IN an action brought to re-
wrongful taxing detsntion con!sgsen Of personal prop
injury sSs estate ss .sohsT ssssssd other
u y Ses. %s um. would
mitted IAN sctionaole act whereby another
WAS iessened 1t that the liberty OF
c"sions Of such statute Ill. Many readily
Of oshsr and furnish no sufficient
ration OF the person who commit. them More than all
80 propsrs, likely lead to much confusion and
hardship. - -
Very questions arise on the chapter In regard 80
The snroyatss ne riy ali the equab powers which, from
ps0n IN Ss Justices o the 's
Court believe that such iundamenta legislation
the Of the counties OF State not
ssss the same hi auacstoas as justices
Court They recsve less compensation are not expected
cise Jurisdiction OF far less To cast upon them in
o p 81 s
law seems to ne extremely unwise. ana IL not directly
| It's general intent
Again. the chapter summary proceedings to recover
land substant destroys that useful and
I % rss Gos sca.y
Ss Ss a: %
comparson OF the and the new law ~ the members OF
ao eSS o hs prosisons Of lhs branch the bill
CIVIL DAMAGE ACT :.
that protesting to be code OF procedure and to deal
Isa IFS limits and rights
self There are many sr'ein OF th' My a,.ea
sections 9O7 9Os because believe if the bin had
They as % 4S o int OF ss
D'nsss S the
other Who shall be Srops
a s y as Or
Of any person shall have right right, OF action IN
by selling or giving away intoxicating liquors have caused
e Of this
lows Amy person may MAINTAIN an action To recover
rsas Of or the dmnu"S
Of support arising in & G1 tns h
caused the drunkenness wholly or IN part ny living or se
as niso 20 against tue OWNER Of the where the
liquor given sod ne leased ."e% !" the gvsj
that noxcatng liquors were to be soa herein , 10 tho
dsmagss for preach of ang % sa the
rserred 10 h snsyeS Of n sseias
By what principle can any Court determine that such
naouaM az ea or "insties Is hidden IN ns secon II it he
ever enforced IT may he enforced by imprisonment
against hs most % parry .ne p5
ment of this law in this arbitrary form is scp which
do not believe the Legislature INTENDED to take;
does isbilities wise or not this statute Is
would not enact 1t without discussion consideration and
the fact that has been inserted in the present act nn
The Legislature DO unicrstand the contents o the BILL
PROTECTION OF FEMALE EMPLOYEES
Another usir iion Of this same ev Is found In the
vru report Of chaote % o. She avs Of the present
materially amended the law for the protection OF female
s sss rs IA .e e s % Yet he
ecion a22 abrogates this statute and restores the
ject. 1 cannot believe that it was the design OF
the present Legislature to repeal its own act
scarcely fortnight after its passage. Yet
that effect of this section. And the serious
question left to our corsiderat is whether there
be yet sweeping provisions OF the General law
hidden In this voluminous bill since the most cursory
De rusal develops mucn that is mschievous.
DISCRETIONARY ALLOWANCES TO LITIGiNTs.
Section 3253 provides that 'in action brought to
oreclose mort real property or for the parti
tou OF real property, difficult and extraordinary
case where has been posed in action. the
Court may also In It's discretion award TO party
further ~ tollows:-
-. In action to orrclcse mortgae, sum not ex
cocding two and halt cent upon the sum due or
claimed 10 be the mortgage
80 In any other specified In this section not
exceeding live cent te recovered or claimed
OF W, the iect nBtter uvOlv.d'
This section 3Jj oi the old pracuce ana
authorizes an allowances only Dy aud half per
cent and % hive cent in the second OF
the OF tho claim, in the discretion OF
THIS the rue until recently so gross had