The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1877-06-12

M. Radov oh vs. Tug Ella Wood.-Libsl for
collision. Libel dismissed.
McFarIsn w. steamer Prince Edward.-LibsI
for collision. The Prince Edward was decreed 70
be the vessel 10 fault, and the matter referred to
q commission to compute damages.
Eonderberg ct ais, vs.. Ocean T0wboat Com.
psny.--Libei for division OF salvage. Uecreed
that s15 900 be divided pro rata between sne
officers and crew OF the tugs hocheesers hlo"
Grande and Admiral. "a.
Jno. W. Cannon vs. Steamer Potomac and All
Meroier VS.. Steamship State of Louisiana Judge
Billings decided that where steamer nss peen
released ON bond. when an appeal 10 taken no
additional bond need BIO given, except Tor COSTS
and accrued interest.
Blanc ct ais. w Lestraps h Co.--New trial re-
fu ed and decree in bankruptcy entered against
defendants. -
Kilgour VS.. New Orleans and Crescent City
Gas Light Company Original record OF case re-
manded to State court, aud petition 10 remove
the case refused.
Third District Court.
William Henry has applied before Judge Mon
roe for q writ OF mandamus against the cisy OF
New Orleans, alleging that he contracted Tor the
grading OF Henry CLAY Avenue the city to pay it's
proper ton In Improvement bonds anu the prop
erty holders to pay in and issue assessment bonds
at the rate OF 81 for Is cents OF the contract
price. The petitioner alleges that the assess
ment bonds nave not been issued according 70
the contract, and he asks for the order to compel
the Administrators to proceed by ordinance to
sufficient to the bonds to be issued relator.
There hs4 been trouble in the Union Baptist
Church Trouble may como TO ordinary indivld-
uals in the course Of their lives, but when trouble
comes to the Union Bapti i Church tcolored) it's
trouble ''surs nuff." II appears by an act passed
before A. Derlocourt, notary, several individuals
Incorporated the aforesaid institution making pro-
vi ion for the Offices OF four trustees, dean, min
lister aud administrator. A subseguent act
changed somewhat the officers. The Union Bsp-
list hourished under this charter and grew
strong, until q short time before May 10, 1875,
when the serpent etole ia and dissatisfaction
commenced. VIM. Moody, who cared for the
souls Of the SISTERS" was alleged to have
acted i'll an arbitrary manner. whilst the
defendants In the case alege that the disfavor OF
Parson Moody 10 wards The flock was that the
oongr. CATION held in disregard the ninth COM
mandmt mt of tie Dedologue. This gap widened
broader aud broader, until suit was filed by the
church against Alex. Vincent, one OF the "un-
righteous" a. was alleged. Jas. u. Coleman,
Erq fought the battle for the church, and yes
erday Judge Monroe decided vipcsnt was wrong,
and that said Vincent had no right to interfere
in matters religions.
Fifth District Court.
Suit was brought before this tribunal by a.
Brieugne, attorney at-Isw, against ID. Boehet,
alleging that the defendant Of bis own volition
testified as q witness in the Superior Criminal
Court on May ID, 1876, and charged the plaintiff
with embt zzlement. He alleges that this act
damaged his character, in the sum OF 500 in
restitution Offices paid by him to Messrs. Cullom
and Oasteilsnos ~ his attorneys, and further
the sum Of $1,000 for their professional services
herein, and for the fur her sum $40 900 primi-
tive and exemplary damages caused by the SLAM
derous prose cution.
In the case Of A. Pilot, judicial seguestrator,
vs. y. r. johnson Il Co., Barnett IL Rsyne inter-
venors, Judge R,sers rendered Judgment con-
tirmi & the seizure by aintiffs of forty shares
OF stick beld by defendants in the New Orleans
Mutual Insurance Company, and further that
Bartlett u Rayne have Judgment against @. y.
Johnson II Co for the sum OF 066
Jas. Graham Va. Geo. h oorman.--Judgment
Tor p aintiff.
A. Hero, Jr., We. Mrs. r. A. Scott.-FurJ reasons
assigned In above case judgment for plaintiff.
SUPERIOR Criminal Court y