The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-03-15

THE STORY OF SIXTH AvEsUE LIQUOR DEAL
Frs INcoNsrAScY-THE sIsoLEroSs SEEK
ING TO BECOME sISGLE--LovE IN THE
KITcHEN-AS uSwIFELY RECEPTION.
Mr. Thomas Carroll has been a liquor dealer In Sixth
avenue tor good many years and Of the best
known and most popular business men in that thor
oughiarc. He is especially noted Tor his amiabili,y
and joyiaity aud like most amiable and joval he
has decided weakness for the other sex. This dis.
position, is not unnpt to be the case has led HIM
difficulties and yesterday In the Court OF Common
Pleas, before Judge Robinson. his name was on the
calendar In which he is defendant, the action
being for breach OF promise OF marriage
The story Is simple one. and yet II Is not without
It's romantic aspects AS long ago as 1871 Mr.. Carroll
met young lady respectfully connected and not with.
out personal charms with whom no formed rcla-
tons intimate than the laws Of society recog.
nize For two or three years they lived together
amicaply that the lady's friends supposed they were
husband and wife, II Is SAID OF them have
not discovered even yet that such Is not the
Suddenly, however the amcable relations which had
existed between them broken on, and this
cured at tho momeLt when tho arrival OF living
pledge OF affection should have sealed there attach
ment. From that time the lady had TO
sing the refrain of the latest d.,y of tho sham ia'
stage
Tell me; could YOU live lIfs over.
you tired Of darlinrs
Answer only with Your eyes
for, from tho day tho baby was born, Mr.. Carroll alb
himself from his love and yet continued pay
the adys board bills for considerable period there-
after But an inconstani lover is apt to prove incon
slant as tho payer OF board and one day Mr. Carroll
stopped his remittanccs Then the lady brought
action %. 900 balm for her wounded
affections, and the sixth avenue Lothario sum.
moned in action Tor seduction under promise oil
when all the facts viii be developed, and neat
little romance ~ promised. On the lady's part
II viii be shown that great grief was brought
upon her aua her family by Mr. CAROLS conduct and
that her brother went insane In consequence
before he could metc out condIgn punishment 10 tho
guilty Thomas; while on the other hand II Will be at
tempted To be proved tnat although thcro may have
SIN II was not supplemented by any such heinous
condition as promise OF marriage. Like most people
Ia loves young dream the plaintiff wrote letters and
these letters will probably be brought INTO court to-day
to nonsuit her The casc IL one ~ which good deal
OF Interest felt, because the defendant IL we'll
known among sporting men and local politicians, ana
It Is expected that some OF tho developments the
trial will prove exceedingly spicy.
SINGLETON DIVORCE SUIT
Sometime ago the facts Of what IS known a. the
HERALD. The action was brought ny Patrick Singleton
hts wife Johanna singleton for absolute divorce
counter allegations OF similar nature, and the trial Of
the took place yesterday before Judge Freedman
the suit we're IN tho humber walks OF life. Blu.
the history of their marital tribuations Is
citizens Without rccapituiatng the old old story,
minueIy describing The mutual discord OF conjugal
inndeity, II Is sufficient TO state that the testimony
merely detailed recital OF the story already told
on the motion Tor aiimony and counsel fce which was
argued some time ago. CONSIDERABLE merrimont was
created by the amusing manner in which one OF tho
witnesses, German, told his story. THIS son oil
Faderland' emphasized his knowledge Of the facts In
q highly dramatic and characteristic manner. His
descriptions clear mud, and seemed 10
tickle the defendant exceedingly. Alter hearing all
the evidence the briefly commented upon by
counsel and then submitted ~ the Court for decision
COOKED UP JOB
few years ago Edward Seynisch was CHIEF cook as
tho (;ralnercy Hotel IN this city A Young woman
known BY the name ot Ellen McCanery, employed
IN The hotel as ambermald The rest OF the story
has al -cady been published In the HERALD. The twain
1t being affair OF love IN the kitchen-werc married
and lived together for some time, when. as
she says, Seynisch abandoned her, whercupon
proceedings were instituted Tor Abandonment,
and the case came up Tor hearing before
Justice Bxby where the procee iings are stu pending
Meantime Seynisch alleges that ho discovered that
his marriage to the woman now claiming 10 be his wife
"a up job" that she had husband living
a, the time, aud that her forming matrimonial ALT
| ance with him was nothing moreor less than bgamv.
On the other side Is Claimed that Mrs. Scynsch pro-
vious 70 her marriage with the whose name she
bears abandoned for at least six consecutive
years by Thomas DAVIS, her first husband; that she
supposed DAVIS was dead when she married Seynsch,
and that all the circumstances Of their first marriage
were known to seynisch when no married her. The
case yesterday before Judge Lawrence, in 81.
preme Court. Chambers, n motion made ON her be.
half to have the custody OF her child gwen to her.
THIS motion was strcnuously urged by Mcssrs Quinn
and Murphy, her counsel and vas vehcmcntly op.
| posed by Isaac q. DOYLE, the opposing counsel Al
| The close of the argument william j. Kane was az.
pointed referee to investigate the question 10 which
more proper custodian OF the child.
WILLING.
Leonard Weber married Ia this city In January,
1873, to Charlotte A. Weber, and they continued 10
live together until December 1875, when she left him
and went 10 Europe his conduct she says, rendering
II unsafe ana improper for her To longer reside with
him. He paid her at the rate OF 81. 200 year until
February, 1871 when he stopped tho supplies, and she
had 10 pawn her cwelry and other property 10 rassc
funds 10 pay her passage back. On hcr arrival here
shc put up at hotel and sen; message 10 her hus
band that she was willing to return and live with him
but he took notice OF her message Being totally
funds she has brought SUIT tor separation from
bed and board and TO have alimony awarded. Judge
! Lawrence, In Supreme Court, Chambers, to whom APP
plication made, yesterday appointed referee "a
| examine into tho lacis Of the case.