The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-06-17

Governor has signed the bill to repeal the act;
Matter OF Sixtyffth from the castery line Of
Third avenue 70 the East kivcr-Report connrmed
Memorandum.
SUPREME CoURT-sPEcIAL TERN.
BY Judge Donohue
Stref, &C., VS.. RechL Xc.-Findings signed
Hardt and others vs. Schutlng. aust have copy
Of stenographers minutes
Patton VS.. Wakefield Earth Closet Company.-Judg
mont Tor plaintiff aud referred to Phiio T. Rugges to
appoint receiver.
Aogert va Recommendation denied.
McCaffrey va Witkuwski ana others Judgment for
plaintin; findings and decree TO be submitted.
Clement and others Sattcry and others.-Find-
ngs and decree signed.
schrenkeser vs.. Happs and others-Findiues and
Davis VS.. Lsaycraft and another Motion to dismiss
granted.
Cornwall vs. Tho Mayor. &c.-JudEmsns for plain
Joseph Vs. Aberle Of nj Judgment for plaintiff
Holman Schiller and others-Findings and do
cree signed See opinion.
SUPREME CoURr-cIRcurr-PA1r l.
By Judge Donohue.
johnson vs.. Jenkina-Memorandum with CLERK.
SUPERIOR coURT--sPEcIAL TRRM.
By Judge Sanford
Babbett w. shrim.- Undertakings approved, and
Hartling VS.. venter ct aL-Fiudings signed aui
filed, snd judgment OF foreclosure and sale ordered.
Kaufman w. observation-disclosures OF limited
divorce In favor OF plaintiff, with costs, ordered.
Colell VS.. schuite.-Tho painti1's motion for re-
rehearing having been had concurrently With the
hearing OF the plaintiffs said motion therefore, and
the additional adavits having been duty considered
adhere TO the conclusion originally arrived a. and
decide that the attachment granted heron must be
vacated.
salter VS.. The Eperrols Collection Company.--Com-
mission ordercd.
Haden vs.. Coleman.-ordercd that judgmen. herein
be secured on appeal
Newcomb VS.. Esrc.-Ordcred that plaintiff have
two anu half per cent extra allowance on amount
reported by tho referee.
Klein vs.. BiauI Order granting motion Tor attach
menL
Coyle VS. The Goodenough Horseshoe Manufacturing
Company; Durando vs. Duncan; hitcham OF al VS..
Froclicn; Same Va. The Stuyvesant Fire insurance
Company; Rush VS.. Hauseit Masur vs. Lees; Kings
ley Va GIBSON; Bell VI. Kent; The Newark Transpor
tation Company vs. The Union Marine Fire Insurance
Company; Tango vs.. Go0c OF n. Evans VS.. Coquitt
e. aL-Orders granted
MARINE CouRT--CHAMBEEs.
BY Judge Goepp.
Harrison vs.. Harrson-0erk's taxation affirmed
Carroll VS., Booth; Waters vs. Hughes; Croker vs.
Fogg.-Moons granted.
Witmark VS.. Kalsh --Grauted, provided notice Of
justification be served in five days from date and So
costs OF motion Ds paid by defendant 10 plaintiff IN
each action within that time.
Mauzone va. Zitto.-Motion to vacate order Of ar
rest granted.
Ewald vs. wohlsbse.-Motion denied No costs
Gerhard VS.. CASHIER. dismissing complaint
Tnornnili We. Selbrecht- Reference ordered.
Bitter Wuster.-Motion denied, without costs
and costs on previous ordor rescindcd
flaming VS.. Farley. -Motion dismissed; stay va
Gated
schendeld Vs. Oppenheimer Motion denied, with
leave TO plaintiff within five days, upon payment Of
So costs, TO apply for leave TO amend summons and
complaint
Penrhyn Slate Company vs. Meycr.-Case settled.
Schwartz va Oppold Clerk 8 refusal TO TAX more
than bill OF costs affirmed. HIS allowance OF 800
for muk ing and serving and OF $40 appeal fpOm
order and his dsallowance Of $40 term Ice, reversed
Donovan vs. BrIgnolia-Motion granted.
STOPPED vs.. Riagiy.-Motion dented.
BcoiIeston vs.. Weyrich.-Motion denied, as per in.
dorscment on papers.