The Morristown gazette. [volume] (Morristown, Tenn.) 1867-1920, 1877-07-25
PROCEEDINGS CHANCERY
COURT.
July Term, 1S77---HOn. Ham.
Smith. Presiding.

| rights of Rose admir- against ID s Noe to
the extent of 1874. Y.
Peter Kern vs. Jno w Morris ct al
sale of land made by the Master to w
| G. TAYLOR. confirmed.
A J Fulton ct al, by &c, VS. ] G Hold
| ges. ex ct al continued until next
| term with leave to file exceptions to
| Masters report
J @ Hodges, execute, etc, VS. Alice A
| StubbIeffeld ct al-continued until next
| term with leave to file exceptions to
! Masters report. lss
James Furguson VS. Frank Horner ct
al-order of sale of house and lot re-
| vived
VIM Chiffon vs. VIM G Scruggs-de-
murer over ruled; entry made nunc pro
| tune. 1Na
Geo. w Lynch VS. Elijah Miller ct al
alias subpoena TO answer awarded; one
month allowed Mcfarland to answer.
81 Huffmaster VS. T G Gain ct al
two months time allowed to answer. ~
Berthena Letorn by next friend, &c,
VS. w B Brooks assignee, &c-three
months time ALLOW ed to answer.
o G Anderson VS. Melvina Anderson
ct al-two months time allowed to file
! answer rf-ts
j II Trent admr. etc. vs. VIM CLANCY
ct ala HeltOn allowed certain credits;
recovery VS. VIM Clancy. execution
awarded after 60 days; fee for Cannon
and Evans good, &c, reported and al
| lowed.
A Alexander ct al exc. etc VS. J w
| Bewley- bill amended; alias subpenato
| answer, returnahle to Sept. rules; Master
| to appoint guard'n, &c.
Geo A Rowe and wife for, &c, VS. Sol
| ONION K Noe and wife-resale ordered
| after go days unless the money and cost
| all paip. i+
AL&H G Gillespie & Co VS. James
B Boyd ct al-order of reviva entered.
VIM Mcfarland VS. Peter Quinn ct al
continued until next term by consent.
BF Borhor VS. j w Cain ct al-three
months time allowed the defendants to
file their answers. - 1..sf tay
Mary ] Riggs guard'n, &C. vs. X Ill
Miller ct al-judgment on last sale note
and execution awarded on application of
! compl's solicitor. eI II 3Es -
r. Geo w Dyer admir- &c, VS. Sarah E
Dyer ct al-Master ordered to pay & W
Huntsman $50; G. w Dyer allowed $15,
paid by him; @ q M to loan funds on
hand. 1z e4W 8a aa3
Snoddy and Leeper admrs, &c, VS.
| Sarah Riggs ct al-Master to retaX costs
so as to disallow 800 taxes to ] ID
Thomas & M, continued; judgment on
Fellows notes $S90.23 and resale order
eQ aIJefs TOUR months, also II Ia dWdFueui
| Judgment on c. Q Johnson's note and re-
sale ordered after four months.
p n Roddy VS. Cowan, McClung & Co
sale of house and lot ordered and post
poned until after the wise of the next
term. EE d. ..-.s. r..s..- f..--.-tls5f .aa
Joseph H stephens VS. J K Stephens
ct al-W ID Cannon appointed guard'n
al Item, and two months time allowed
to answer for all the def'ts; H Williams
appointed receiver. aea % 1874 t.9
0 G Anderson VS. Thomas NJ Anderson
ct aI-two months time allowed to ans.
J G Hamps VS. l. Kirkpatrick ct al
two months time allowed to answer.
B J Dyke VS. B T BarhorsetJ al---death
of def't Hall proven and two months
time allowed Barhor to file answer.
Carrot Lane ct al VS. II F Cain ct al
one month time allowed to file amended
bill.8 sela oata7 t9as4 saI sta
VIM C Fuller ct al VS. Eaton Fuller ct
al-sale of land to F w Taylor confirm
ed and Master ordered to make decd, &c
to pay solicitors fee Of 1854 so and pro-
waite the fund on hand, &c. s; Gltb
Saml II Horner by next friend, &c, VS.
Saml Hale ct al-continued as on aff1dvt
of def't Hale. .-...
Ell Loop vsJ NJ Haynes ct al-Master's
report confirmed, sale of land ordered
after four months. sa.~ea 5
Hugh w Taylor admir-, etc, vs. Willis
Grantham-admr allowed 81 so for SER
vices in keeping p Grantham; admir- to
pay funds on hand to @ & M and he dis
tlibute the cause referred to Master to
take account and report to next, term.
Alex Hogan VS. A Mcfarland admir-,
etc-recovery in form of comppt 81 344,
50; appealed to Supreme Court, tendays
allowed to file appeal bond. sl@ 20
Preston Mills VS. Eliza Mills-diyorce
granted. .- ..-... .,s-..{s,ssH 1s1
= Maggie Branner ct al by, &c, VS. B NJ
Branner ct al exc't-Master's report CON
firmed, referred to Master to take an arc
count as to fee due King 81 Park, solicit
tors, etc. .l..f .tsa.aes1 eHt
ThUs Webster ct al VS. Curtis Eames et
al-sale of lot ordered after so days from
Hawkins, Butt & Co VS. Jehu Morris
ct al-iudgment pro confesso take ex-
ecutiOn in cross bill. ..f-.{ ,-.-.
] Stephens VS. S X StephensLinjc't to
stay waste granted upon bond being Civ
en-, etc. .e..3 y l4dH1 DaE
w Donaldson exee't VS. A M Troll
niger ct al-continued as on affidavit of
def'ts .S
CHI Witt VS. E Beckner ct al-motion
to qnash the levy and attachment con-
tinued until next tern. -es Ie.tfl.. a
B Witt ct al VS. j NJ Bewley ct all
demurers over rule and three months
time allowed to answer, and leave grant
ed to amend the bill and C q M to issue
subpoena and copy of bill to Hawkins
county. - .,-fr.....s- s,t.-stl
JH Hall VS. Emaline johnson. ct al
Inlet dissolved on the def't giving bond,
etc. is -8zi EtE@ eaj ss%za17sss
d Taylor ct al, admrs, etc, VS. H
Cameron ct al-Master to proyate funds
II.
from docket.
G E Carriger ct al VS. the Mayor and
Aldermen of Morristown and others
final decree in favor of comppts; appeal
prayed and granted, and bond approved
and filed.
] w Moser admr of Joseph Hamilton
decd VS. r. L. Wilson-bill dismissed at
comprts cost and execu't awarded.
L Houer admr, etc, VS. w B Gun.
ningham ct Ale & M To pay funds on
hand to compPtS and strike cause from
Curtis Eames VS. G r Nagee-excep't
to answer sustained aud three months
time allowed to file answer to excerpts.
Alfred Gibson VS. o G. Anderson-in-
junction dissolved on def is giving bond
Alexander Hogan VS. Joseph Hamil-
ton, dGc-Jno w MDseF admr eft al allow
ed until next term TO plead or make de.
Tense toascire facias.
SW Shields admir-, etc, vssQ A Mon
roe ct al-demurer over ruled and three |
months time allowed to file answers.
Barton, Mcfarland and Evans vs. Jas
Pierce ct al-judgment on sale notes and
resale ordered after four months.
Jas I Shields VS. w A Dickinson ct |
recovery in form of compl'ts fee $435
and costs; appealed to Supreme Court
and one months time allowed to file |
bond.
The uncertainty of the law may be
illustrated by the fact that there is now |
in the hands of the Clerk of the Supreme |