New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1877-03-30
CIVIL NOTES.

The Court Of Oyer and Terminer will be opened
saturday morning.
The Supreme Court General Term. will meet on
@t f r morning to render decisions and ADMIT TIE ''us
Ii the divorce sut of Eliza Nieman against Ferdi-
nauJ Nican in which referee has reported in favor o Tie
wife Jdgc Lawrence has refused divorce until the
pcadngs the oI,er OF reference are srut TO han.
Daniel Gillespie OF Harlem called az lie Office of
the Receiver Of last November As TAX bill Find
ing large Guber0 persons present anxious 10 evade tie
additional percentage Mr. Gillespie lneosed the money go
in an envelope addressed TO Martin T. McNaon Rrce7e
~ weeks after ne called FOX hs receipt an as aol1aed
missing money have proved uhaV&is am u, So 1 ~ ~
Harlem CIVIL Court TO recover he amount
In the Connolly will contest before Surrogate Cal
win Yesterday Benedict friend and scEoc
mate Of Mrs Heay he contestant, tcsIhe to conversa
tor~ between Judge Connolly and his daughter Mrs. hesy
VIM" i nc .i Mp Healy replied thst she nd cone With him
learn whether or nos TIE charges @s&" ar Iity
OF visiting places True some uier F,rs
dsuaheI wanted 70 see either her u M eay
again.
The suit of Thomas W. B. Hughes against Jacob
r,po which has trial two days in Sdpreme
Court Circuit before Judge Barrett ended by
verdict for the plaintiff MI Hughes was br AeI and
some ago rendered an account q his taacor. TO- tie
ceiendant ne I T va, H. i"g SSi bgg by i seun
IT being mal5G1 1n " was a. 4, Tr in tiS cirrcs O. S
MISSIONS which ~ 90. money p'1 ~ 20. 81 ~ n 'r
& 49, 81 49, Isl d. ST. Porter appeared fOr plaintiff
Richard Busted Tor the defendant
In Supreme Court Chambers, before Judge Law
rce motion was made yesterday in the suit Of Aaron Smith
et the Erie Railway Company 10 compel ReceiF Je"ei
u nav the costs Of the appeal The plaintiff recovered YER
diet for coo County for the loss OF lie hand "
t; NEGLIGENCE Of railway eUlloTes and when e company
ne iudarn, ut affirmed BY The Court ui pcas
7, ~ cia,ncd na appeal urged by hsceiyer EFT
81 M, com were pad by him, and Lac sh0ud ai least pay
a. costs 81 aypeal sci The motion was opposed on me
rDJ mar t, company dissolved ana iii Jev.t
moi rceivcr 10 general debts but 10 iaerye The
interests % the bOnChnders uhuet t"V IV4'e"o ""ubo
Lawrence reserved his decision
In a suit by the executors of Frederick = "hiton
a,ast Hr Masury former partner an application was
ad YESTERDAY 10 Judge Lawrence IN Supreme Court Cham
- tor an order compelling tho defendant to exhibit tae
os Of the firm During the lifetime OF M "Aiton DC al
d N te usness firm and It's bookkeeping IN New
or while the defendant attended 70 the manufacture OF
fbei- ros The partnership agreement provided tat me
y0r shord take the business and account 10 me tte 1i
ms yesterday thAi there
eyr was on stated between ne pa iHtrs
me wing PARTNER two years ait+I Mt. i'hs ute,h
eTrd an account which the executors clam Is iO- rdc
TE claim tat there is due them s3oUOO more tl Is al
oW,l in the account The notion YESTERDAY ~s on
that mere 'nshhs eAAlinIs41 III dh'
- noter siT psnng that the BOOKS ~ee kcl ~ ~
SVTiiuu and his nephew, and the accOnn vas
49,, then Jadgr Law renee reserved his deelson