Belmont chronicle. [volume] (St. Clairsville, Ohio) 1855-1973, 1877-02-22
COURT REPORT.
Present, Judge OKEY, Clerk MITCH
ELL, Sheriff KINNEY.

John Parker vs.. john Heslup; de-
cree for sale of mortgaged premises; lii
default Sheriff as Special Master Oruer
ed to sell premises.
State OF Ohio VS.. Sigmond Ntuder
fer; a0tte prcSequi entered by the attOr.
ney for the Sta,o as 10 char ge oil Grand
larceny and def ndant entered u ples
of guilty to petit larceny; sentenced iC
pay d fine oil 800 aud costs and to stand
commit,td until paid.
ReDec +. Palmer vs.. Robert Pal
mer; divorce; decree of divorce granted;
plaintiff to have caslody OF minor
ichildren, and 500 alImJny.
+. Mahugh Ell. al. vs.. Mary A. Billip
ct. al; Partition; ordered tnat writ Ol
paI titIon issue to the Sheriff and that
Dy the oaths of Vim. Doaglsss, Thos.
Garrett and Lafayette Austin Partition
be mide oil the prem iSes in Inc petition
described.
Wm. II. Henderson vs. Sarah j.
Barnes I'll. al; judgmeht by ueiauit
against defendants ior S344.32; Urdered
tnat sheriff sell properly attached ty
him in this case.
Jas. Wick vs. Tiptou d Lee; judg.
ment by default against uefendants tur
sI35.52.
James f. Anderson vs.. Eliza Brown
ct. al; judgment 10y default against de.
iendant tor STA 80.
Sheets. Maring d Anderson vs.. Lock.
wood d Burg undtnal; jud nent by de-
fault against defendant lor $20i.31.
State of Ohio vs.: VIM. Kelly and
W IN. McCatfrey; violation oi 4,h Sec,
liquor law; plea ufguilty entereu; lined
800 each auo costs and tu stand com init
ted until paid.
S. l.. Mooney vs.. James ii. Black;
Judgment against defendant for $663. 81.
Vim. Ii. Vail, admir- vs.. Mary Ann
Morrison; on application of plaintiff An
attachment is granted in this action for
81, ,7S0 and $40 probable costs
Joseph Mead vs.. Thomas Minney;
heard On motion tu discharge attach
ment in this css mo ion ovsrrnied and
Sheriff ordered To sell property attach
ed according To law.
Edward Wright vs.. NathanSMeFar-
land; judgment by default against de-
fendant ior $50 and Costs.
State OF Ohio rs. Aft. BalZell and
Thomas Nal Carren; indicted for viola.
lion of 4th section ilQuor law; plea of
guilty entered; Court hned each uf the
parties 500 and costs aud to stand com-
mitted until both are paid; it appearing
to the Court that the unla Iful sale OF
liquors by defendants has ceased no
order is made abating their places of
business as nuisances is made.
State of ONO VS.. Frank Linn and Pat
Whalen; indicted under 4th section
liquor law; plea of guilty entered and
defendants fined $50, and each to stand
committed until paid. Same entry as
to abatement as above.
State oi Ohio vs.. Mich. Feeney; in
dicted for violation OF 4th section liquor
law; defendant entered into IA recogni-
ance in the sum Of 500 for his appear.
ance on March 1st.
State of Ohio vs VIM. Colvin; indict
ed for ''shooting at with intent to
wOu2d;" defendant entered into a re.
cognizance in the sum of $500 for his
appearance at the next term of Court.
State of Ohio VS.. Albert Heneke; by
leave of Court nolte prosequi was en-.
tered into in this case.
State oi Ohio vs.. Albert King, Johr
Davis, Louis Welshance; "Rape;' pleas
Iofnot guilty heretofore entered with
drawn and pleas Of guilty of "assaul
with intent to commit rape" entered
land defendants we're refnanded to jail
State of Ohio vs.. Patrick Burke
"Rape;" plea OF not guilty heretofcr,
entered Withdrawn, aud plea guile!