National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1877-01-13
THE COURTS.

/"
80 THE COURTS. -
Supreme Court Of the United States.
On motion Of Mr.. Z. N. Dickerson, E. B. Bar
4 prsetics ss an attorney and counselor Of this
No Sos. The Missouri Valley Life Insurance
Smith. Thfs cause was submitted on printed AZ
y Ma sns = gSE g. ssr III
The ascendant in error, under the tventfsth rule.
ss MsyssSfssd sy,pp plaintiff a,rS in
BY Mr.. W. E. +. Deal, Of eounssl for The plain
/ ssfdant IL error, Under the tweutistA rule =
10. 159. Joseph ". Stanton OF AZ. plaintiffs In
srS, w. ds%,s E%SN e :, NJ
COUNSEL for the deisndaat ID error, and concluded
! No. ioo. II. W. Fuller And I. ". Barnum, up:
| penants, Va Enoch 8. Yentzer ct al.ia y
10: idi: NV. Fnl'sr md !. y, Bsrnun, ap-
No. lo2 II. W. Fuller and I. W. Barnum, ap-
| pellants, 70. H B. Goodrich Tbs argument Of
nn% for Sppsansa sSd continued b.
Mr.. W. B. Scstes for the sppellees. '
| Adjourned until Monday at II O'Clock.
Supreme Court Of the District.
ana ar aseA aaS s ON &c a
/ IIA9ILIrY OF A PuRcHAsIB In THE TRANsFEa OF
4 nnAL zsrArS-How AND TO WHAT 1xrESTTHE
I rcoHrnAcf MINDS BOTH rAxTIrsI Essgoit
Is!oes q .srrsyys; p; Q. Forrest l 7: orms.,
action on an overdue promisory note. and raises
the question o,what sytent an tndorser may be
and what constitutes = residence Argued and
oSaiiss S, Busdy. trustee. vs.. Freasrisss A.
cepnons The plaintiff sues the defendant In that
August u ls7S BY deed executed b., A, O. Web
pointed trustee for the purpose, among other
and GnnnsIfs recorded subdiyisfen 81 square 4s5,
and the plaintiff, in pursuance Of the authority
conferred, advertised the same to Be sold ON Sep
TENDER u 1874 At public auction, On the premises,
isss bearing inieres. at 10 pei cent. payable an n
nuaiIy. on tAs following terms: One third cash.
balance in one and two years, With interest Iat
time Of sale, and If the terms were not compled
with the property was to be resold at the risk and
Of as h
defendant bid q, ZOO subject to the decd Of trust
Of 1900 and interest, Aforesaid, and the same
ceded to the terms, making the deposit Of $500,
and agreeing to pay the balance. fsgl
While the sale was being made, and before
completion, the plaintiff informed him that there
was lien Of $3.50 prior TO the one of $4,000 which.
however, would be paid by the trustee. aud, II
The defendant took possession of the property,
and continued to hold 1t until the same was re-
sold, receiyiDg the rents and profits for eight
but failed to make any further payments on the
gale, OF, interest upon the $4,000 deed Of trust,
reason the said property was advertised and sold
at public auction. 1t did not realize . sufiaient
trust for e COO By reason Of This the DEFENDANT
became indebted to plaintiff, amer certain dedue-
tions, for t4iS6s. WITH interest thereon at seven
bssiess costs. In the court below the Jury re-
turned verdict for defendant, and the case came
On M ss me-
Q. II. Thomas for the defendant. Argued and
submitted.
Equity Court.
-s r Before Judge Wylie.
MOTION TO REDUCE ALrMoNY-A DECREE OF
as~.. -a..5 DO -Tt DIVORCE.
Hevey & Dole Vs. Mcdowell, ct al Thirty days
allowed to take rebutting proof.
Johnston vs. Johnston, Decree Of divorce.
s.. shilss vs.. vs. McNamsra Vacation Of pro con-
aside vacation Of January u, ISL. =
Keys Is: Keys Commissioners' return Of dover
Aother rs Mosher ct al Vacation of pro con-
Foskey vs. Henderson. Appearance Of absent
unknown defendant ordered. -
Midier vs.. Davis ct al. Approval of bond re-
Nailor vs.. Nailor. Motion to reduce alimony
Browning VS.. District Of Columbia. Ten days
further time allowed for taking proof
W. wilhelmina Blumenberg. -,1.-|'E
Parker vs.. oden. Taken under ADJUSTMENT.
Taylor Young vs.. Harvard z sharp: Re-
Police Court.
Before Judge snen. m, D 1r5
4 KNIGHT OF THE GREEN CLOTH DISMISSED FOR
or. WANT OF EVIDENCE TO HOLD HIM.
Edward Roach and John Kemp, ARRAY; Is each.
WIN. Williams and West Adams, violation of the
hack law; g each. Thomas Simms, assault on
s. Henry RACIAL same ss%Ss LAVE
murphy profane; IS. Dennis Quill, assault on
jail. WIN. Nsaie, assault on Lucy Green; sio and
s sa or g Gays Scott petit Larceny Of
days in jail Charles B. Bell, larceny Of an oyer
coat worth 40 from Herman Hover; complainant
Alice wilson, larceny Of y from May Hsrris SIX
months in Jail. - :. --..r III. -sfFrr-'
In the case OF The United states VS.. benjamin
E Beverage, charged with keeping q Faro bank
which has been pending for several days, MT
Miller, for the Government, stated that he had
three witnesses under bonds to testify, but with
these he could not make out case. The most
important witnesses he had not been able to find,
and under the circumstances he would have to
ask that the case be dismissed. It could be re-
vived again whenever the witnesses could be
found So ordered. ... -r-
Henry Stevenson, eharaed with the larceny of
loIeo LIOm w H. DOhtu. grdnu jury, DOnQs.
Patrick Boxley, charged with assault on Anna
Brown; $5 and costs or Is days.
Court Calendar for To-day.
EQUITY COURT, before Judge Wylie.-Nos IS.
Boyle vs.. Shepherd; Is. Bigeiow vs.. Connecticut
General Life Insurance Company; n. Filler vs.
Bergling; %. Williams VS.. Moulton ct al; q.
Raleigh VS.. Berry. D.. TT.
Calendar for Next Monday. D..
SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT, before
Chief Justice Cartier and Justices DIN, Hum
phreys and MacArthur.-Nos. Is Holden vs. Lin
Vile; 16. Boucher VS.. Haycock; II. Riley We.
Kirk;l Riley VS.. Church; 10. Basshor VS.. Kill
bourn; %. Gunton w. Zantzinger; H. Lazenby Va
Webster; rs. Straining VS.. Walker; 26. Alexan-
der vs. Bouldin; II. LAWS vs.. Lee.