The New York herald., 1877-07-10
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBERR.
Rx Lnnaa Rarrnft


Miller vs.. Aston-The principle upon which the
Board Of Assessors should Is cear to JUS
tily a peremptory writ The question as 70 whether
the Board acting upon present change OF grade, u
not limited TO an assessment OF the damages arising
from such CHANGE not as free from doubt - the re-
laor think. careful scrutiny OF tho act Of
1859 would to justify q formal consideration OF
the question. An alternative writ may, therefore, Is
sue, with continuance OF the Injunction until nnai
determination.
O'Bren VS. Astsn-Same decision as in the Miller
note the criticism a. 10 the waat OF proper
case but that IN view OF tho lsct that an
alternative writ s all that would be appropriate upon
the relator's own papers.
the moneys in his HANDS under the judgment and or
ders OF thls Court force the time such payments
is m ocer OF aSe court would have been guilty Of
contempt II had refused obey such judgment and
The referee is not responsible because the or
der IN f0rcc and binding upon him at the time OF Inc
payments has since been changed Motion denied,
without costs.
Mutual Life Insurance Company vs. Balch.-Opinion.
BY Judge Donehue.
In the matter Of tho petition OF Frederick A. Conk
ling for tho sequossraslon. &c Of the secor Sewing
Machine Company-Ordcr granted
schultzo VS.. Menges-witness must answer qucs-
tions.
the plaintiff.
SUPREME coURT.sPECLAL TERM.
BY Judge Dononuc.
Gault VS.. Berrian ct aLThe parties evidently have
the partes shall select referee While the Court
s always willing listen to suggestions, 1t cannot as
sign what the rule ures 1t 10 do to the attorneys
II attorneys would make themselves familiar with Tho
BY Judge Van Brunt
Emo vs.. the Mayor, &c.-Findngs settled
COMMON PLEAs-cHAMBERs.
BY Judge Van Brunt
Abrams Bernard vs.. Adelaide Standardization for
alimony denied. Counsel Ice Of $50 allowed
Fisher Burr.-I do no, think that the plaintiff
makes a sufficiently clear to justify the grant
lug OF mandatory injunction The statements Of
the landlord made on bchaii Of the plaintiff are so
examined by the defen dant that the effects OF his af
davits is very much impaired. Motion, with $40
costs, to abide event.
BY Judge Van Hoesen.
Herman KreppeL-Moton for new trial granted
payment OF costs OF trial and OF motion. See
Amsdell va Garde.- Motion for trial granted.
In the Matter of Abraham Backer and Henry
Nathan Il Co-Petitions denied in both cases. Soc
opinions.
MARINE CoURr-cHAMBERs
BY Judge Goepp.
Hanson vs.. Wagner. Judgment for plaintiff.
Brewer vs. Ester; Stetter vs. Lane ct s..-order
granted.
Sturz vs. s.rurz-Demurrcr overruled
Seymour VS.. Dayton-Order granted.
smith VS. the French Manufacturing Company
Notion denied, with $40 costs.
Thurber vs. Herman; Guanazo Mnsante Of al
Order granted.
Lssky VS.. Chris.alieE. Attachment granted.
Kelly vs.. McMullen Order OF substitution granted.
Carsten VS. Tucker et al Order OF arrest granted.
Goldieder vs. Scnalaniek.-MoIion granted, with $40
costs
Cox Halorap.-Order OF arrest granted.
Ayers Van Rscd-Motion granted, on condi-
TONS
Tasto VS.. Ohlsen.--Attachment granted
K0rse VS.. Sparr.-Order granted.
Barr vs. Donovan.-Order removing cause granted
Hitz et al. W. Griswold-Order to show
granted.
sullivan vs. Dugan and others Trillardelli Va Rich
ard.-Ordcr Of arrest granted.
Meyening VS.. Hoagland. .-Attachment granted.
Godmansvs. BuUorosky ~ Order Of arrest granted
Kramer vs. Braun.-Order granted.
NAME vs. AnshIr; Meyer VS. Wolowitch; GRADER vs.
Mchaleck; Morcer vs. Perkins; Cohen vs. Albert
order OF arrest granted
Dowdnev vs.. Huber.-Bond approved.
In the matter oil George W. Niles-Order granted.
Green Cohen.-Order OF arrest granted.