Alpena weekly argus. [volume] (Alpena, Mich.) 1871-1893, 1877-11-21

Der TO-, asSumpslt, continued
C. Alpern vs.. II. b. Johnston, re
plevin, continued.
J. Sheridan and ID. II. Holmes
VS.. r. Rayburn ct al, garnishment
continued.
q. w. Moffat VS.. r. Rayburn, as
sumpsit, continued.
Ann Kennedy VS.. f. Miller, as
sumpsit, continued.
Aletta Kramer VS.. Jos. Meyers
replevin. continued.
d. McCallum and F. G. Carey VS.
]. r. Beach, replevin, continued.
Alpena Harbor Improvement
Company VS.. w. L. Churchill ct al
assumpsit, continued.
A. Pack ct al VS.. NJ. n. S. Ma
cartney, trover, continued.
j. B. futile vs.. ID. Scott, appeal,
continued.
@. N. Fletcher VS.. Alpena Lum-
Der Co., replevin, struck from dock
ct.
G.. n. Fletcher VS.. G. Prentiss ct
al, replevin, struck from docket.
d. Macarthur VS.. Il. B. Johnston,
case, continued.
J. Fl. Fletcher and w. Winslow
vs.. VIM. Beck, assumpsit, contin-
ued.
Z. Taylor VS.. II. Vrooman, eject
ment, continued.
Francis Palms VS.. Richardson,
Avery d Co., continued.
G.. G.. Speechley VS.. c. Burrell,
assumpsit, struck from docket.
q. q. Speechley VS.. c. Burrell
and B. Lee, assumpsit, struck from
docket.
w. J. Carney VS.. ]. Gavigan and
Ellen Gavigan, assumpsit, verdict
for plaintiff.
M. Fechheimer ct al VS.. III. Beebe,
assnmpsit, continued.
II. Tigheon VS.. II. q. Spratt, as
sumpsit, continued.
NJ. Ii. Birge ct al VS.. j. X. Lock
wood ct al, assumpsit, continued.
r. Wagner VS.. d. Kennedy, re-
plevin, continued.
q. Campbell VS.. f. II. Dyer and
b. Wagner, replevin, continued.
III. ID. Churchill VS.. A. w. Com
stock, administrator estate c. Wal
ters, continued.
People vs. J. b. Johnston ct al,
debt, continued.
S. L. Hitchcock VS.. c. N. Cornell,
assumpsit, verdict for plaintiff.
A. C. Thompson VS.. D. Kennedy
and G. Campbell, replevin, contin-
ued.
J. G.. Beekman VS.. L. J. Sylves-
ter and S. Flanders, attachment,
referred to A. r. Mcdonald.
G. l.. Maltz vs.. Union School
District Ossineke, assumpsit, con-
timed.
II. Harmon VS.. r. Rayburn, as
sumpsit, continued.
Eliza Robinson VS. L r Sanborn,
assumpsit, continued.
} Gavigan VS. w Jenney and Z
Harrington, plea in attachment,
w A Goodwin ct al VS. z NJ
knight, assumpsit, verdict for
plaintiffs.
w. NJ. Johnson and r. O.Wheeler
vs.. J. Kesten, assumpsit, verdict
for plaintiffs.
b. p. Mumford ct al VS.. NJ.
Stafford ct al, assumpsit, verdict
for plaintiffs.
b. p. Mumford ct al VS.. j. Keat-
ing ct al, assumpsit, verdict for
plaintiffs.
b. S. Colwell vs.. d. Crippen,
issnmpsit, verdict for plaintiff.
p. Baldwin VS.. II. Clewley, certio-
'ari, verdict for plaintiff.
II. Bolton and d. McRae VS.. M. |
:. Haley ct al, assumpsit, verdict for
plaintiffs.
r. Montross VS.. !. Heating ct al,
umpsit, verdict for plaintiff.
y. Krolk ct al VS.. j. Hunt ct al,
lssumpsit, verdict for plaintiffs.
b. S. Benson and S. d. Woods
IS. NJ. O'Brien, assumpsit, verdict
or plaintiffs.
S. p. Pierce VS.. +. K. Armstrong,
verdict for plaintiff.
j. L. Gray ct al vs.. J. Kesten, as
verdict for plaintiffs.
p. Macarthur VS.. G. ID. Bradford
md NJ. Cady, assumpsit, verdict for
q. l.. Maltz and j. p. Whiting
3. g. d. Bradford, assumpsit, YER
let for plaintiffs.
J. Doan VS.. j. McElroy, assump-
it, verdict for plaintiff.
+. a. Strang and +. II. Burt VS..
I. X. Lockwood ct al, assumpsit,
erdict for plaintiffs.
c. NJ. Henderson ct al VS.. J. X.
lockwood ct al, assumpsit, verdict
Dr. plaintiffs.
w. G.. White ct al VS.. Y. NJ.
might, assumpsit, verdict for
laintiffs. 7.
ID. Scott VS.. Alpena Lumber Co., ,
ssumpsit, verdict for plaintiff.
T.. Brown VS.. c. Heating, assump- |,
t, verdict for plaintiff.
j. ]. Potter ct al VS.. Alpena
amber Co., attachments, verdict
II plaintiffs. |.
A Anspach and II Knoch VS.
Heating and G Heating, assump- (,
t, verdict for plaintiffs.
Walker McGraw Company VS.
lpeDa Lumber Co., assumpsit, YER !.
rt for plaintifrs.