National Republican., 1877-01-30

tiaIy; 9. N. Thomas counsel for defendant. I'd.
ward McCabe, indict cd for taking fifty dollars
wSrah mons on S SSnnnpy U he plead Suv and thc
court sentenced him to one year in the penlten.
tlary. James II. Beverly, charged with entering
1870 and taking therefrom copper and lead valued
at Sl0SO; this ls the second onenso for petit lar
ceny; the jury brought In verdict Of Gaihy, and
the prisoner was sentenced to the penitentiary
for eighteen months Adjourned for the day.
District Court.
Before Judge Humphrey
John ". White vs.. Steamer T.. Norris. This
was m action Of libel against the steamer for
ssI33O, and an appeal noted.
Police Court.
Before Judge smell.
TAKiNo VI rRKsH STOCK OF rouLTRY-A
REAL OLD IRISH FioHT BETWEEN MICKEY AND
MRS. SoLAS-A STOLEN WATCH CONES TO
LIGHT, TOGETHER WITH THE TBIKr.
Frank Brooks, larceny of an overcoat from
Chas Conneil; s2j or thirty days In jail. Howard
Manner, larceny e hat sorth 81 from George
ella Bryant, threats to PinkIe Williamson; siol
personal bonds to keep tho peace. John aud
Comique,, Saturday night 80 each and costs.
Charles fIii1ell, larceny q a dog worth t2s the
iendspi dismissed. Michael Nolan, assault on
iauit thirty days and bonds to keep tho peace. e.
Samuel Thomas, colored, larceny Of q lock worth
q the district Of SOpmen sr@nd
bonds. .w!iiiam Nolan and Martin &oicS,
berry In putting him in bodily fear and stealing
and carrying forcibly away hts gold watch, worth
HshIy is srs%Ss ass oo ss. SRs. % ss
elb collateral for assault and battery.
Court Calendar for To-day,
SUPREME CouRr OF TUE DISTRICT, before
Justices wylle, Olin and MacArthur.-Nos 30,
S,arrys Starr: y, Law vs.. Lee; 81, Loary ys.
fordj 3s, Hardin vs.. Rothweil, administrator; 30,
Kelley We. Heller; 40, COburn VS.. Crockor; A,
Robbins vs. Hall, ct al.; ~, McIntire VS.. vii.
CiRcrIT CorRr, before Chief Justice Cart
ter.-Nos. Q, Lyons VS.. Ford; 0 wcser vs.. the
District Of ooiumsai :, MIillngton ct 81. y..
SSn III Ha HSmG U AID 1s0 Rr9sa
vs.. Chronicle Publishing Com pany; 10, Wall vs..
Mprtigh; -, Harmann vs,. Chapman; 81, Gum.
d, sSultI vs. Jones; s., MoKnisht vs.. iasby;
60, Goblens \ WorritL vs.. Raub; Is, Yon Haake
nR o. Folo$ss Raosd aa1a Z @pmSn y
mings; 81, London, New York and Hartford Pub
eomniisonors, se., y. Tally; %, Bordics VS.,
Buckley; lOi, London, New York and Hartford
RsSl,hIng Ri,n,hn Company yS Bn.rS, iO ToP
Telegraph Company, ll3, otterback VS.. Faunce.
CRIMINAL COURT, before Judge Hum.
phreys-The United states vs.. Chas. Dutley;petit
larceny. The United states vs. John Maxwell;
ton; burglary. The United States VS.. John W.
Garner; larceny. The United States VS.. Frank
United States % vs.. Frank so FosSlnder: ~ resisting
officer. The United States VS.. Joseph Meredith,
petit larceny; second oaensc. The UNITED
otfense.
Supreme Court OF the United States.
On motion OF Mr.. Alfred Russell, Benton
Haneheit, es9, of Saginaw, Mich. and A. T.
court
on motion Of Mr.. Archibald Hopkins, william
Ssa to s as sonss 1Ssy snd sd
n! On motion on OF q nj; George ". Mscssry, EFT; f T.
court
ON motion Of MT. Solicitor General Phillips, R.
Nj. Widney, esq, Of Los Angeles, Cal, was ad-
mitted to practice as an attorney and counselor
On motion Of Mr.. J. D. Mcpherson, John @.
mi!,sd to practice as an attorney and counselor
on motion of Mr.. George H. williams, Charles
Rit,sd q practice as an attorney and counselor Of
No. 400: Chester Badger ct al, plaintiffs in
error, vs.; The United states, er rel. Matthew and
%ncd States aSs i
nois. Mr.. Justice Hunt delivered the opinion Of
the court, Affirming the judgment Of the said Cir
No. Sol. The City Of Omaha, plaintiff in error,
VS.. Aaron Hammond. In. error TO tho Circuit
6rSsEa. Mr. Justice Miller delivered the opinion T
Circuit Court in this cause, With costs and in.
No. los. The Consolidated Fruit Jar Company
appellant, VI. James 4. Wright Appeal from
Southern district Of New York. Mr.. Justice
Swayne delivered the opinion Of the court affirm.
ing the decree Of the said Circuit Court in this
No. ia WIN. il. Cammeyer ct al. appellants,
VS.. John Newton ct al. Appeal from the Circuit
trict Of New YORK. Mr.. Justice Clifford dsiivsred
the opinion Of the court, affirming tho decree Of
the said Circuit Court in this cause, with costs.
Charlotte Bostwick, administratrix, &C.;
No. 1853. Charlotte Bostwick. administratrix,
SS Court 81 g limited oS.
Waite delivered tho opinion OF the court, rcvers.
ing the judgment OF the said Court OF Claims, and
remandipg the cause with instructions to render
Judgment in conformity with the opinion Of this
oySS. NS g. Ghs Gsrt unsS .Spss s au PSs SSa.
Claims. Mr.. Chief Justice Waite delivered the
opinion Of the court, reversing the Judgment OF
the said court Of Claims, and remanding the
cause for such further proceedings as law and
justice may require.
No. 1874. The West Wisconsin Railway Com
pany Eta plaintiffs In error, vs.. ID. J. Foley
No. 1876. The West Wisconsin Railway Com.
pany ct al, plaintiffs In error, VS. ID. J. Foley ct
al. In error to the Circuit Court OF the United
States for tho Western district Of Wisconsin.
Mr.. Chief Justice Waite delivered tho opinion OF
Circuit Court in these causes, with costs and $500
damages In addition to interest
No. l6s. The Electric Match Company ct al.
plaintiffs In error, vs.. The United States. In
error to the Circuit Court OF the United States
for the Northern district of illinois, Mr.. Chief
Justice Waite announced the decision Of the court,
afiiIming the judgment Of the said Circuit Court
In this cause.
No. 7i3. Peter Doyle. Secretary of State Of
Wisconsin, plaintiff In error vs.. Tho State0f Wis
consin, ca rel, Drake. Mr.. Chief Justice Waite
delivered tho opinion Of the court, denying the
motion to set aside certain proceedings OF the Su.
preme Court Of Wisconsin In this cause.
No. P77. The Continental Insurance Company
Of New York, plaintiff In error, vs. Zadoek II.
Daniels. In error to the Supreme Court of tho
Territory Of Utah. On motion Of Mr.. K. T. Mer.
rick, docketed and dismissed, with costs.
No, To4, Elisha Ruckman, plaintiff In error, vs..
William II. Bcrgholz. The motion to dismiss
this cause was submitted on printed arguments
by Mr.. Cortlandt Parker In support Of same, and
by Mr.. Francis Herman In opposition thereto.
No. ls0 Geo. Jerome and y. q. Beaman, as
sIgnees, hc., appellants, vs.. Thos. N. MoCarter,
trustee; The argument Of this cause was con.