The Carbon advocate. [volume] (Lehighton, Pa.) 1872-1924, 1877-06-16

Tor chiding her. I worked dav and night tn get
out OF debt, but she wouldn't second my Efforts
Sne always did all she could to provoke me.
Pnld large amount for doctor bills for her.
Am willing to provide Tor her II she'll return
ana behave herself. The last furniture and car
complaining she complained all the tine
Told Mr.. Neakel to take care OF hur after had
struck her twlth the knifel.
Tuesday June 12.--Although the belligerant
couple appeGr IN holiday attire and apparently
ready ior reconciliation, the battle continues.
hlf' Beitz is once more called to the stand and
from his testimony IL may be inferred that the
greeneyed monster had something to do in
bringing about the difficulty. This might also
have been inferred from the testimony of de-
fendants brother.
Jos. Engler- Gives the couple a good reputa-
ton aud s1ys that they had dwet paaceably TO.
ago
Hannah Eames-Know the Beltz family some
, OF years. we occupied one house together
Remember that at one time. we were cutting
up some at their house in MIR. Betz's absence
mis-. Beltz-Then explains the Stahler affair
Stahler was at our house many a time with
Beltz at times alone too.
DR.. DeYOung-Beltz has been represented to
me as very abusive man 70 his family. lie is
not drinking man.
AT this the evidence closes.
Com. VS.. Daniel Martin. Threats-In this
case defendant is called on to explain what
gave rise to the difficulty between himself and
the prosecutor, ROmg. lie tells n plausible
story, according to which he is innocent Of the
ouenhe cnArRed7-ot course. .r
1ilghman Cragle-Known Martin since 1851.
Never saw anything wrong in him drunk or
Noah Houser-Live at Quakake, about mile
ttQm Martins; nothing can be said against him.
heuDen Stuart-Martln is good enough man
Wneh SOBER. Have not seen hlm drunk within
the past year.
This closes the case and the Court concluded
that each should pay one half of the costs iu the
case, as best calculated to induce them to dwell
peaceably together hereafter.
Jas MeFadden who IN an eN1 moment COM
mlJted 0n aggravated assault upon has mother,
was next laced ON trial. His was a plain case.
Ont a. the accused Is known 10 be of uusound
mind which was also satisfactorily proved on
trial the jury found him mot guiltyn as the
District Attorney had suggested, and recon.
menued his case to the proper action of the
Court.
The next case called was that of Com. VS..
Reese Price, which latter was charged with as.
sault and battery by one nav. Potts employed
the Yorktown cOlliery. The assault as
charged, look place in an air shaft at which
Potts and Price were at work and originated in
aoc9 Goniiict OF authority The prosecutor and de.
1endant were the only parties heard, after which
verdict of mot guilty" was returned by the
Jury who imposed the payment of onefourth of
the costs upon The prosecutor and three.fourths
upon the defendant. Another waning AGAINST
the bringing of trlfiing cases into Court.
,l; com; vs. J.. Bllhelmer; in which pedagogue
idea now to shoot at Lehighton, appeared as
prosecutor, was then brought up. From the
evidence II a lpeaSed that some time ago Mr.
smith had lie an old hat in DEFENDANTS care to
be renovated. This hat defendant failed
return, as promised, but offered to send It by ex.
press .. y. ID. which offer Mr.. Smith refused to
accept. He wanted defendant to deliver the
nat as he had agreed TO do. The conse uenCe
was prosecution on charge OF larceny, which,
could not be maintained, and after patiently
listening whole half day to the testimony in
the case, the pleas of The lawyers and the
Judges charge, the jury very properly return.
ed verdict Of not guilty" and thus that peda.
gauge "od hat will cost the county about
a hundred dollars
Com. VS.. Fred Krone receiving stolen goods.
Defendant a JUNK. dealer, is accused of having
received quantity OF scrap iron, stolen from
the l.. v. II. II. Co, the proof of his knowledge
quilted.