New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1877-02-23
NIP VERHGCE'S ARGUMENT.

,,u,t,-,.rt,t
49,, LII tl,, C,,,,,,,i..i,n
Mir Mcrrlck thch "ddlt7'tu th' COMMISSION
"h "i,.i VI ,'' ,i,. ~ ~, c-,.,,,.r,,on NJ t,,i.
Suii'u tut '1'I, Pi''' - 80 49,
case nat he did IN me Florida case '' nevertheless ~
ml'' accept 'le j"'H"''', " ',' -
cipir' "hf'h'F III "-'.'' VIZ. IN " -,
dressed himself to the Tribunal believing they would adj
ber. "a thcir pr,yi,us decisions and apply the
principles 20 the ''''l 10 .'' ~ '7'" go | -
did "a the Louisiana ana fIolI' cases II '"o '"u
,,.-.,,, f,U,vy.I m. rulings already made by II.
pun"o of'i.''I "Iu,ii "rI,I-sr tl",e Iur,'ss
SUI. ~ j !, ''..'-' ne. l,.t In NJ.
I,,t 90 he had c-liad hat II WAS competent for
loI, 'l I fi,,l H., ,,9, '.r I.,,oi. charges
f i,t, a., fr,!d hl. tuc t.iim.,,.on had determined
Tr, UI Nd rover 10 do 49, and hc must consider that
T r .aau!lia az their Judgment va- that toe ccrth.
o 30 O. y,r.i,r NJ: tE. cnucu. i've and ultimate
t ~ ,.rorped by The STAT, beyond when they had no
Tovrr tn 20 wien in louisiana ana FLORIDA lou pass =
gpfrofcd by the rs.,lts Of tie Returning Board,
and Won SAID i.rc we must sop, .or hero
rights Ct,a'lt u-r Federal power 10 tlr.
considered tho ona, 81 cl'Cor, AID showed tL',
i, va. an oies given TO tne states h 'erl" -fan ~
power aud ,he.ri- ia i-s respect must % ''-'ui''
,,, .i incumbent C.r.,,ip.
on the point as to "ho VA. in' ''' ln,u''N'' ,i'.i
VI W. va -, , ..,,sl and ...to,. i,,f,jc,s ~
u.'''''''' '''"''" Wv A. -, ,.,.,ol' ,.,t ...
the Commission ensu'd' M NERVES '''' INV! ~.
to IN, had the ,a.is,e,,o of tile to the
,' y..,oI I'I gltf.! NutAiug The oppo,ln, counsel
siI IN considering The evidence OF tt" possessed b.
,;;i. MAJ he L,u IN, cr.tiHrac from the secretary oI
IN b..
pu.uorf Ia BE- It's headed abstract Of votes cast ~
trc presidential election Oregon Nc II does not saJ
80, rl,.,'t.s al tLr vote
Mr. I..c Miller qs.cl: Does that paper contain all
TN abstracts u evidence sent up hN The clerk ut CIrl
county! /, not I tIt thu secretary bad HelO.c NM
an that Doe could compare! ,
SIR McTcE-lie could make BIS abstract OF evidence.
In CSlcrIcn.c 81 thn'c cd''S hif' Io"i' 'Ii"l
adccr discargiuc tie duties corresponding to that iH
uu~.J hy Tie statutes OF oregon upon 'e Ht't'a5 o.
- tr uid make rtncr ant very remarkable papers
Mr. H,IrirE-l 90 not 40 understand IT, mere Is ENl'
fo.cc ia y0u, suggestion, hit dG moi Uh'I,N at u'
c su ..t'o- I'D 'th pay a. ~ ', ~, ~,
IN an c- and satisfactory construction. UNDERSTAND
that We mu,i ah. II rs we ht H. ,.h Is III VI
Df'-oL u',f w. and II 81 t. word ub~frIc,' wien
u.,,.g Of tie clerks. that the canvass Is something
different from abstract AMI iLat hc Ought 10 Gc.J u nc
L.y mad" canvass, aut tuu WI"l u u'r l'' "o'd III
evidence. that s the canvass mate, ana ot SAY 'Hl5 u
som. result mag have reached
Mr.. Justice B...de5-ls not "A canvass m act
M Alerrirk-Nrs, ,r3
h.. Justice Brldicy-Ihcn YOu cannot nave tIuf.
Mr. AI"rIIchtO on cannot have thc exact ACT but yoU
may have the record oi IT,
! NJ. justice Bradley Is nor mar Wial WIS i"''"'
Mr. McTi,N- THINK not rms II u canvass "I woes
made as Nh Justice 'iul'f SAYS. ~ ~ pt''"3 'i',
/ that u NOT what .'nr lfll' hil utlis VIII ,
NJ. Justice MIci-Icil me what Jod mean O5 a cali
vas,
Nh NcUic,-i moan sitting Oh thc woe.
Mg. j.. ricc nl!.I-"Hai record "h "'th even WouiN
De- made OF u bar putting ~ the No'cS tlul were can
/ y,ss,d ana showing the Icsu'tI
M. Airrslch-i VII explain il can. Lam required to
canvass Get sam DISTRACT woes lh' you EN' H,'' Hh'
3