The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-05-24
bond should be amended asked, and that justdca-
tion should be In double the amount
~ T,Ao

bond should be amended asked and that justlca-
tion should be In double the amount.
BY Judge Barrett
Folweil VS.. Hancox. Referred 10 Mr. Clarence A.
Seward TO hear and determine.
Loeb schiller Receiver discharged ALLOWANCE
fixed and balance ordered TO be paid.
The Mayor, &c., vs. Martin -Uron the conscnt
within this motion may stand over TO the hrst Mon
day oil June.
Macdonald vs. oBrisu-As It is lett to the Court TO
fix the compensation, am oil opinion thai 100 would
be tar under the circumst and that the suost
tuition should be granted on payment OF that amount
In the matter Of l65th streeL-upon the publication
OF the notice. and upon the AFFIDAVIT OF Mcdonald
satisfied with the proceedings, and the petitioner
may take the order
Hail VS.. Knowles. Motion for Judgment denied.
but motion to place cause on Special Circuit calendar
Tor irst Friday OF June granted.
Holman va BIrxc.-Case aud exceptions settled
Malloy vs. Sunern ct all huve looked at lines vs.
Lansing but can perceive no similarity between mat
case and the present; upon further reflection my
been appointed ne ought not TO b, discharged nor Inc
parties be permitted 10 discontinue until the creditors
are s,sled To permit parties 10 bring such SUITS.
remove their assets from the reach OF execution by
vesllng them in the hands OF receiver, ana tnen,
rectlon as they may desire, would be 70 permit the
equity powers OF the Court TO be used 70 hinder ae
lay and aeIaua creaora speak o. me prn e. i:
receiver is the test Alter that the Court will SEQ 10
IL creditors protected and that the assets are
mol Withdrawn from us control
SUPERIOR coUnT-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Chief Justice Curtis.
Fetner ct al VS. Van Saun ct sL-Thc injunction
order is continued force as Restraints the de-
PENDANT, susannah Van saun, from parting with the
notes, or either OF them, before payment, and from
parting with the proceeds OF any that may DC PAID.
BY Judge Sanford.
Gumpcrt VS. Strausse ct sL-Judgment for deien-
dant.
Butler VS. Tongue ct al Order disseminating &C
ton and cancellation Of undertaking.
smith vs.. smith-Order directing the fling of tes-
Turrel va Winfield 81 aL--ordor to die security
for COSTS -
Hustled, &C, va. Rathbone-Two cases-oruereu
DAY calendar for May "a
COMMON PLEAs--cHAMBERs.
By Judge J. T. Daily.
Matter of Kennedy MOTION granted
Nagei vs.. NageL-Aosiou granted and reference
ordered.
Marzolf VS.. Undergraduates granted. with $40
costs, 10 abide event.
Masters VS.. The Eclectic Lie insurance Company;
Roberts VS. Hill.-Relerence ordered
MARINE coCRr--cHAMBERs.
BY Judge McAdam.
Carpenter va ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS are entitled
separate bills OF costs up TIL judgment and to one bill
OF costs upon argument Tor new trial $50.
McNulty. receiver, vs. Beatty -Motion granted for
Wainwright vs.. Ellery See Endorsement on papers
ssxtonv vs.. o,BrienIordsr vacated without costs;
exam alton ordered TO proceed.
Becker VS. Metropolitan Lie Insurance Company
Taxation affirmed WATTS Code 2os note G, suodivi-
sion A.
Mathot vs. McCrcery. roll corrected by
dcducting $4S 10.
Resented VS.. strong Judgment for Sl63 II
Hamilton vs. Characterization dismissed
Gold and Stock Telegraph Company vs.. Little.-Judg.
ment vacated.
HanKns VS. Decker Motion granted.
Coleman vs. Levy-Arrcst vacated.
Lewis VS.. Whitc--Ordcr resettud.
Murray vs. Luthcy. -Execution set aside.
Marks Vs. Raivle. Compliant will DO dismissed II
terms not complied with
Witmark VS.. Kaisch; Rosenbaum Vs. Crowley Hud-
son VS. Macarthur; Ross vs. The Grand Trunk Railroad
Company; Abraham w. Kirk; Cooper VS.. Brooks !,
Rich VS.. Bachrlch; Thaum vs.. DAVIS; Manowtch vs.
sky vs. Davis; Scott va Watts; Gardner Doughcrty;
Danroih vs.. Rainier Orders granted and flled