The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-05-20
DECISIONS.


tessment Is levied on the CITY,
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT--cHAMBERs.
BY Judge Barrett
Matter 0, Bartlett, &c-Grantcd.
Matter, &c, OF StewarI-Rcicree appointed to take
Gates vs. Gates.--Upon these papers the plaintiff can
take an order vacating the stay
SUPERIOR coURT--sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Sanford
Candy va butcher. Receivers bond approved.
Townshend vs. Alien on AL -Reeronce ordered
Slavery al VS.. Low.-order granted and under
Hayno o. al vs. o'Connor.-ord rcviv,ng action
granted.
Rothman vs. Neverath ct al.-order tor puohcaton
Fowler VS. Keligau-ordcr amending order OF May
granted.
Miller Lynch -Oruereu on Jay calendar Iof
May "a
The Republic OF Peru vs. Reeves Judgment signed
Hunt VS.. Mc.cher ct al---Comn ssion ordsfcd
Cary VS.. Cary.-Order granted and undertaking ap'
proved.
arrest granted, with Slo costs.
| Levy VS. tirossman -Order denying motion for in.
Junction and Receiver, With $40 costs 70 defendant
Furkngton VS.. Deehanty.-Order granted ana un'
The North River Savings Bank VS.. roran ct all
| Order appointing r. NJ. COZ receiver, &c
| Wilson vs.. Adrlancc. Order granting dcicndaot an
extra allowance OF $3.50 o,,
VS. Bowers; The Dorchester Tn ION Freesons Company
VS.. Blossom ct ai-Orders granted.
by CnIet Justice Curtis.
/ Butter vs. Austiu.-Order Tor commission
/ Quinn vs.. Van Pelt Ordered Oh day calendar for
| Monday, May II.
Ross vs.. Harden ct al-order restoring cause to
calendar
vs. Torrcy Order granting plaintiff extra allowance
OF hve per cent on amount recovered
Lestcr VS. Long.-Ordercd that proceedings DO dis'
! charged as against Edmund Long
BY Judge Sedgwicx.
Weber, &c, vs. STANDARDIZATION granted; new trial
| ordered; verdict set aside
Adopn vs. rhs Central Park. North and East River
| Railroad Company. -Case and amendments sottlod
COMMON pLEAs-spECIAL TERM.
BY Judge j. T. Daily.
Matter OF A. and h. Fiaurand vs. Shaw-Sce mem.
| orandum with clark
New York Lile Insurance Company vs. Sllcock. -
Memorandum Tor counsel
Field ana another vs. Sanford Motion denied. II
appears ina, there Is dental OF material alieeston
OF the complaint; also that the indebtedness .as OK
tended by note falling due only after this action was
commenced; $40 costs to defendant
Conns VS.. Masiors.-MOtion denied; cause not rcyl-
larry calendar.
purand vs.. Tne Ornamental Mirror Company.-De-
fault opened on payment OF $40 COSTS and defendant
ls!I
sherman vs. McGin Under the circumstances
OF this case do not cc justified in ordering an extra
allowance. MOTION granted, without costs
Hollywood rs. Hollywood. Further proof wanted
TACT male material by section A. article 8, r. s.,
Unjust Vs. Burke Proposed supplemental answer
should be served with motion papers Leave 10 re-
view motion granted.
! McMurly vs. Kerwin.-Moton cened for want Of
proof OF service Of amended complaint on parties APP
Gunnison vs. Nichols-Motion srapted A receiver
should be appointed, but he should not be party 70
the action owing to tho OF the dispute TO the
debts TO be paid out of the collections
MARINE CoURr--cHAMBERs.
By Judge McAdam.
Blauvelt VS. Parker. Costs against the estate OF
deceased person DO allowed only upon the special
order OF the Court. % Waits Pr 53b.) The in tho
III anit tn " apre
tors plantns and ail In the action. The moliou
VIII, therefore, be heard on the merits on the 2sd
Ross va Grand Trunk Railroad Company. Taxation
affirmed.
Earle VS.. Newman. vacated on stipulating
not to sue
Lewis vs. whne-sec Endorsement papers.
Hudson VS.. McArtnur.-The defence is technical
ono and ought DO favored. The defendants ap-
piication 10 compel reply being discretionary, will
Fisher VS. King Smith Va Rowc.-Motion Tor judy
ment granted. conditIonally as per Endorsement %
Casanova vs. Trugulo, three casesl Judgment for
plairtin demurrer, Win costs.
Comstock VS. Ramsay.-5ee papers.
RaUensten vs.. brennan. Decision hed
Thornton vs. wograLi; Krizer vs. Berger; Kimbai
VS. Donnei; Ford W. kea. tnree cases. Motions
Boomer vs.. Ycrby. Proceedings dismissed.
Ragsaae VS. Grinin; vannett vs osborn; Peck vs.
Many Gottsucbcn VS. O'Connell; Beerreer vs. Sch0o.
Icy, Ialman VS.. beer Barpum IS. Carpentcr.-De.
faults noted.
Tetuito vs. Mann Motion denied.
schaeicr VS.. StcsneE-iir. A. q. Anderson appointed
receiver.
Glcnuey Us. McGill.--Motsou granted; no costs
Wheeler vs.. brennan Default opened aud cause re-
stored calendar Tor May "a Oh payment within two
days OF $40 costs 81 motion aud $40 Term fee.
Schott Hamilton.--Un der the prayer relief
appellant VIII be allowed 70 serve proposed case
within three days on payment OF $40 COSTS
OLSON VS.. Lewis.-A. ii. RouicDush appointed re-
ceiver
Marks VS.. Rawley.--Motion to vacate arrest denied,
but speedy trial ordered.
Ia 70 Ho!ener defendant discharged his own
rccogDztnce anu examination set down Tor The 23d.
Neral VS.. Duparquet; Fiusger VS.. Same.--rroccss
amended nunc pro tune No COSTS.
Mullen vs.. Larkn; BrcS vs. Stcinberg; Konnc W.
Graves, bunny vs.. Flanagan, II tho matter oil William
/ Morgan; Kirkland VS. solomon; Klttrck vs. Kelly;
Hawk vs.. phiIbrick Hess vs. Norrsvc Manuactur-
Ing Company; Bernowsky vs.. Jacopy FolAaft VS.
Fciix-Ordcrs granted
| Howell VS. Behring Inspection allowed.