The Morristown gazette. [volume] (Morristown, Tenn.) 1867-1920, 1877-01-24
Chancery Ooart Proceaines.

the Hon. Hamilton c. Smith, Judge
presiding. when the following proceed
ings were had:
7 @. Hodges, Exr-, etc., VS.. ]. B.
Stubblemeld ct. al Order to take ac-
count revived.
Samuel Horner, by, &C.. Va. Samuel
Hale and others Continued without
terms. 3E ss
9. A. Alexander ct. al, Exec'rs, ETC..
vs. J. w. Cain Ct. al. Process awarded
against j. T.. Cain.
B ] Dyke VS. b r Basher ct al. Z s
Hall, by Solicitor, enters his appearance.
VIM Moore ct al We wv b Millican CT
al Final decree directing the G and NJ
to pay certain claims and distribute the
residue, &c.
JH Trent, Admir-, etc, VS. VIM CLANCY
ct al. Sale OF land confirmed and $75
allowed admir- for his services, &C, and
and III TO report costs, &C. to next
term.
Peter Couch, Admr, etc. VS. John Cox
and others. G and M ordered to make
deed to ] ] Couch; time allowed Admr.
to settle; Master ordered TO make settle
ment and report to next term.
| George w Dyer, Admr, etc, va Sarah
i i Dyer ct al. Fifty dollars allowed and
ordered paid to VIM Mcfarland, Solicit
or, &c; judgments on sale notes and ex-
ecution awarded. a.,as
James Combs and Wife ct al VS. John
w. Duncan ct al. Final decree distrib-
ufing funds in hands of G and M.
Mary ] Riggs, Guardian, &c, VS. Robt
Fl Miller ct al. The Master ordered to
pay funds on hand to w Mcfarland, So
licitor, &c, after deducting one-half the
costs of the cause, and $25 allowed ] G
4 Rose, Solicitor, &c; G and nj to credit
Rice's note with $6 %, taxes paid.
a j Fulton ct al, by, &c, vs. j @ Hodges,
Exr, etc. Order to take account reviv.
i ed.
Barthena Sehorn, by her next friend
VS. w B Brooks, Assignee, &c. Defdt,
/ by his Solicitor, waves issuance of pro-
cess, &C, and enters his appearance.
/ G FL Witt VS. Elizabeth Beckner ct al
BY consent, F NJ Farmer and Wife have
two months to file cross-bill. 81
/ D Merritt ct al VS. The Corporation
of Morristown ct al. Bill dismissed as
Hing; leave granted compliments to file
a new bill; respondents allowed TO rely
on their demurrer in their answer.
Peter Kern VS. John w Morris ct al.
Land ordered sold unless the complnt's
debt is satisfied in ninety days.
Curtis Eamas VS. g T Magee. Complt
allowed to amend his bill; copy of the
order, &c, to be served on G I Magee
&c waived &c, and two months time
allowed to answer
| Harvey Loop VS. j III Haynes and Wife
ct al. Order to take account revived.
W @ Pullen and others vs. Eaton Pull
len and others. Bidding on land REQ
lpened and to stand open until 10 o'clock,
noon, June 1, 1877.
John Lawrence VS. Amy Lawrence ct.
al. Bill dismissed and execution order
ed for costs.
James Nj Bennett VS. Thos Ell Evans ct
al. Sale OF brick store house and lot
confirmed to G. w Folsom at 81, 1856 90.
Maggie aud Sophia Branner, by &c,
vs. B M Branner ct al. Causes. &c reviv-
ed in name of 81 Fl Taylor as Admr. &c.
IN room OF T Webb, resigned; cause
referred to Master to take and state an
account, &c; @ and III ordered to make
deed to John Talbot for the Watkins
tract of land. -;s.ssr.s
George A Rowe and Wife, for &c, VS.
! Solomon X. Noe and wife. Decree to
enforce lein retained on land to secure
j Ct Roses fee, &c, and Master ordered
to sell the land if fee and costs are not
g Rose, Admr, etc, VS. d 8 Noe ct al.
Decree .dispOsing of funds in hands of
C and III. -;
James Furguson VS. Frank HoFner et
| al. Sale of house and lot set aside and
resale ordered after four months.
i19Robert Mcfarland VS. s B CrowelI,
Admr, etc. Order OF sale revived and
to DC executed, and report made to next
term.
Susan J Noe VS. James. Smith. Scire-
facias awarded against Thomas w john
son. ~
III @ Thurmand ct al VS. II III jackson
ct al. Scire-facias awarded against per-
scnal representative of ID Morris, when
appointed.
Thomas r Read VS. B Fry Decree
confirming sale; ordering execution OF
balance, &c, and costs.
w 81 Jolly vs. w n Mcclure ct al.
Sale confirmed; Talbot to pay costs and
fee of o G King of $50; execution to
issue on demand for balance Of decree.
Leeper g Snoddy, Admrs etc VS. The
heirs at-law Of Russell Riggs, deceased,
and others John Talbot substituted
the rights of ID Morris; and q and III to
pay creditors as moneys come into his
hands on land sales, &c; decree ON sales
notes of G G johnson, ct al, and resale
Of land ordered after three months.
B A Mcfarland, Admr, etc, VS. Nj III
Baily and others; and Robert Evans and
Wife VS. B A Mcfarland, Admr, etc;
and B A Mcfarland, Admr, etc, VS. III
Bewly; and ] M Bewly VS. B A McFar-
land, Admr, etc. These causes and ex-
cePtions to the award on file, are contin;
ued rs on affidavit of complt Mcfarland
until the next term, and leave granted
him to take dispositions, DC, to sustain |
said award
Il G Fuller ct al, Exrs, etc, VS. VIM A |
McCoFklc and Wife ct al. Complts or |
dered to rent out the lands for 1877 and |
report.
A Donaldson, Admr, etc, VS. IN |
Bewly and others. Admr allowed 500 |
for his services, which is ordered paid |
when funds are in hand. as a
Thomas Webster and others VS. Curtis |
Eames. Bill dismissed as to all the lots
T " Hurley VS. Curtis Eames. Bill
dismissed, and execution awarded ag 'st
defendant.
Danl Noe VS. Ell Rosenheim ct al. One /
months time allowed Holt to answer
Cowan, McClung 81 Go VS. a Hobbs |
and Wife ct al, Two months time al /
lowed Hobba and Wife 10 answer.
j g Stamps VS. G Kirkpatrick ct ell.
Two months time allowed to file amend
ed bill. s52at
VIM Mcfarland VS. Peter Quinn ct al. |
Process amended as to Charles Mcclure.
VIM Chiffon VS. Wm & Serpggs. FL
nal decree for complt. Appeal prayed
and granted, and one month allowed to
Ole appeal bond. -
IL Bewiy rs g. g G and G r e Co
ct al; and q, G and g r II Co VS. nj II
MurFelI ct al. w ID Cannon appointed
Trustee, &c, to take charge of the prop I
erty and collect rents, pay costs, &c. Fl
I Daniel Noe, by &c, VS. J C Noe, &c al.
Executions awarded fer costa against
complainant, &c. Il
INV Taylor and Wife VS. Willis Gran.
ham. Cause referred TO Master TO take ,
IA account and report to next term.
4 Hogan et al VS. Joseph Hamilton ct
L. John w Moser, Admir-, etc. allowed |
lntil next term to answer scire-facias.
Daniel P Noe VS. Mary A Noe. Di-
rorce granted eomplainant. So
Sarah a Pickle VS.. Henry Pickle. Dill