The Ottawa free trader. [volume] (Ottawa, Ill.) 1843-1916, 1877-10-20


week, growing rapidly in experience in the prac
tice of this court and in favor with the attorneys
generally. He is evidently going to be popular
and successful. FN
The grand jury finished its labors this week, re
turning % indictments, to-wit: VIM Under, 3
selling liquor without license, selling liquor to Q
minor, keeping open tipping house on Sunday
VIM Poland, larceny Michael Allen, burglary
and larceny; Thomas Porter burglary and larcc
ny; James Carlin, ., selling liquor to minor and
keeping open tipping house on Sunday; David
Young, larceny; Ole S johnson, burglary and
larceny; Michael Gassburner, burglary and lar
ccny; Terrence Cosgroyc, assault with intent to
murder; Vim Smith, burglary and larceny; VIM
Clark, larceny James Mcmahon, assault with in
tent to murder; Jacob Meyers same; Gottieb
Kerfe, >, selling liquor to minor and keeping
open tipping house ON Sunday Peter Hagen, 9,
same. The criminal docket will be called next
Monday, and also petit jury.
Cases disposed Of during the week;
CRIMINAL DOCKET.
% The People VS. Joseph West. Keeping open
tipping house on Sunday. MOL pros as to Pat
rick Finlan and plea Of guilty as to the LIST and
ID counts. Fine Of $40 on each count and costs
OF suit, and prisoner to stand committed until
the fine and costs are paid.
IS Same VS. Thomas Porter. Plea of guilty.
50 Same vs. VIM Under. Selling liquor Plea
Of guilty as to the first six counts, fined $50 on
each count, and mol pros as to balance.
20 Same vs. VIM Poland. Larceny. Plea OF
guilty.
Al Same VS. VIM Under Selling liquor to mi.
nor Plea Of guilty MS to one count and fined $40
and costs.
go Same VS. Michael Glassburncr Burglary
and larccdy. Plea of guilty.
30 Same VS. Vim Smith Same ..
81 Same VS. John Blackburn. Larceny. Plea
Of guilty.
81 Same VS. VIM Clark. Same.
d Same VS. Vim Under. Keeping open tip.
ping house on Sunday. Plea of guilty as to the
inst three counts and fined $40 and costs each
mol pros as to the balance.
COMMON LAW DOCKET.
Dismissed Ca@s.-231, + T. Canda d Co, for the
use Of, etc ysC &PRR Co. assumpsit; 3Ol,
Catharinc Smith VS. Edward Wilzcn, appeal;
497, John Il Lailcrty VS. Thos Kitchens, appeal
5o!, Louis Covil VS. Amos Robertson.
467 Troutman, May Il Co VS. Joseph Rosen-
haupt and Joseph Wcrthcm. Assumpsit De
PENDANTS called and dcfaultcd and damages asses
scd by the court at 1858 45
- Elizabeth Phillip VS. G II Force and W l.
Phillips. Assumpsit. Defendants defaultcd and
damages assessed at $40 3 and costs,
cHANCERY DOCKET.
81 Jacob Lowman ct al vs. George Cushman
ct al. Mechanics lien. Continued by agree.
ment.
107 Walter Cumnoek VS. Ella Cumnock Di
vorcc. Decree
ia In the matter of the application Of Bcnja-
min Pickett guardian of Robt b Pickett Petit
approved.
1856 Harriet Munroc VS. Joseph Munroc. Di.
vorce. Decree. a 81. GA. 30
William Pollock VS. Matthew Wilson ct Al
In chanccry. Decree.
. Nancy VI Williams vs. VIM Williams ct al.
Partition. Referred to master.
Heinrich Gcrding vs. Vim Ebert ct al Re.
port of master approved
90 James Morrow, assignee, vs. Marccllus +
Collins ct al. Foreclosure Report Of sale ap.
proved.
20 James Thompson ct al VS. Bridget Gaicny
ct al. Foreclosure. Decree of foreclosure.
l4s Philanda Allen VS. VIM A Allen. Divorce.
Decree pro co,.tisso; finding Of extreme and re.
peatcd cruelty.
III Jacob Sharp VS. Archibald Armour ct al.
Bill to ioreclose mortgage; default; bill pro ron
J"so; finding for complainants SllO3.50.