Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1877-12-11
FIRST jury.

FIRST JURY,
Lowell Nr.spn G4mags. Foreman,
DanuIars, Joostnan Alexander.
Rapioyd, Narf0u VI Adams.
WoodsJock EGtf7on Billings.
Stonaham, SeweD BaGcg5.
Puis 90 .1mc0 Chase.
gucAha!d. Alfred Cole
Sanner, Niiilsm II DowGes.
Fry eburg, Andre" II. E9Ahs.
SamuJi Frye.
Hiram. George (. Gould.
Norway. William Halt.
SECOND JURY.
Porter, Jordan Stacy, "a, Foreman.
Lowell Sampson II Hartman.
Porter, Roscoe q. Heard.
BrowDfeId. Pherdeus Hill.
Oxford. James l.. Holden.
Denmark, Theodore |. Lowell.
Albany. VIM. H. Mason.
Sweden. George Plummer.
Waterford, John S. Swan.
Paris, Leander Swan.
Brownfeld, Horvilie II. Wentworth.
Bethel, Daniel +. Bean.
Thomas Reynolds, OF Canton, Solomon
Chase of Paris, and Nathl w. Adams OF
Hiram. were excused.
Most OF the day tuesday was occupied
in calling the docket aud arranging cases
for trial. The continued docket numbers
49l. which is the largest it has been for
several years. There are 125 new entries.
Nearly all the attorneys in the County
wero present the first two days OF court.
also quite a large attendance in and
around the court room.
The Probate Court was in session
Tuesday at the Oxford House.
The first case tried was No. 1913.
John Demerritt ct al v James Garland.
Action OF assumpsit, on an account an-
nexed to recover for goods. The plain
tiffs are merchants residing in EliiDghar1,
n. H., and claim to have furnished the
goods to defendant and family residing IN
Porter 10 this County said goods con-
sisting of scythes. provisions, &C., to the
amount OF S37 10. The defense was THAI
the goods were not sold TO the defendant,
but were delivered to his sons, who were
of age. 10 part payment for services per-
formed in hauling timber Tor John De-
merritt, one OF the plaintiffs, and Dr..
rowle. Verdict for defendant.
Redlou. hastings.
No. l8S.-James l. Wilson v. Charles
II. TiDbeus. The plaintiff, who is a
praciiciog attorney in Ashland, n. H.,
brings this action TO recover pay ter pro-
lessiora! services, ia prosecuting a sun
10 favor OF the present teieodsHt nseia. t.
one WeeSs The defense is taat toot'
eas = specific agr 'neag w-'-ep5 tne'
pla. vas ~. to receive arT;L.Eg rn.ra'
the s1it VAS successful. N1'ning 'As re.
covered in said suit
Re.srred t. he Cont. JCdsmen. re-
served.
j 3. Eaton. Hastings.
No. l94.-Wiiliam Evans v. John 5.
Atwood. Action OF trespass tor breaking
and entering the plaintiffs close situated
in Fryeburg. The plaintiff claims that
on the l4.h OF Nov. 1876. The defendants
steers broke into hi, field, and hooked
and so gored and wounded his cow that
she died. The defense was that the
steers were not owned by the defendant,
but were the property of his sister. a
maiden lady who resided with him. Yer
dict for plaintiff for $50.
Hastings. ). Is. Eaton.
No. 162.-Freeland Howe Y. lnhabts
OF Woodstock. No. 1853 .-Freeland Howe
and wife v. Inhabt's of Woodstock.
These two actions are for damages for
injuries alleged TO have been received by
the plaintiffs, by being thrown from their
carriage in the defendant town. while
riding between Locke's Mills and Bryant's
Pond. on the Goth day of ALg. 1876 On
trial full report rix. week.
Bisbee. Black.
Strout. Foster.