The Ottawa free trader. [volume] (Ottawa, Ill.) 1843-1916, 1877-06-09
TIE COURTS


large and contains work tor not less that gear
continuous session. His lion0r, however, Il
crowd,ne the work along rapidly rs possible
and we expect 10 see i large amount OF wori
done during this term Following is the recort
for this week;
CoMaoS Law POCKET.
+ Martin \. Howell V. The Maryland Firi
ms Co. Deb:. Dismissed to- want OF prosecu
zion. p,,i
more Same order , =.
5. Same ". The Un!0n Fire lns Co. OF baiu'
more. Same plder
10. Peter brown vs.. John l.. McCormlck
Eiectment. Continued.
49, Christopher SchGick V. August E'cr'
Appeal Continued.
TO- j. p. Hurst 1t al IS. Edwin Williams el al
Mechanics lien. Masters report OF SAFE approx
81. John D. Cation vs. jeremiah Wood Eject
ment Trial by court and finding for plantln.
80. Hoses Lane ". Nathaniel ). Pierce Ap
peal, Dismissed FOR "aht OF prosecution r.,.
A. Peter DUuDhuc ". John liociger' lfes-
pass. Dismissed by plantiii.
"a ToLn Salmon vs.. Thos DDnOghuc. Same.
81. e. Robinson and c. K. Wheeler vs.. B'd
of Supervisors Of La Sale Co. AssunIpoil. DIS
missed by plaintiff.
So Moses Brennan Va. fdtlick ihoII' appeal
Continued
Co. Frederick Myers VS. Willard Farnham and
Fred. EASTMAN. Appeal. Dismissed and judy
rnent against defendant here.
49, Andrew j. Slzcr vs.. W. *. swallow" re,
pleyin Defendant called and deiaulted ana
damages assessed ny the court at one cent.
1866 ,'abez Machcy vs. Michael j. Asher.
Eectmeu,. Dismissed by plainiil
ia. Chas. y. Pierce v. w. W.Jih Trcspass
on the case. Dismissed by plaintiff.
l7j. Chris. Perrin W.. Peter L, Cassidy and
George Armstrong. Trcspass. Dismissed by
plaintIG.
rs. Jacob Il Bluslough IS job Dawson and
Albert TLayer. Appeal. Dismissed for want OF
prosecution Notion by defendant to set aside
order Of dismissal and for procedcndo, and to
vacate judgment.
l0i. /. L. Yoe v Co. ". Geo. Il. Bclfold ct al
Dismissed Dy plaintiff at defendants cost.
2U2. Streat0y Gaslght ~ Coke Co. VS.. Geo. c,
Campbell CT a. D,bj. Dismissed by plaintiff.
90 Peter Douohue and John Madden, for
the use ofJ. c. Croker vs.. W. \. Pollock ct al
Appeal. Continued.
23l { NJ smith VS. Z R Wicks. Appeal. Con
tnueG.
927 Al Fisk y. VIM Van Vliet. Same.
29s II " S,ai. IS l. 3 Ti,son. Same,
233 Vim Scarlet vs. Price " Gibbrr-on. Same.
22G Eliza Baatcn vs. Glenn & Alt Appeal
l,ismit. ed by appellant.
26S willard N smith vs. Patrick Byrnc. Re
rleyin, Dismissed rs plaintiff, defendant to re-
cover costs,
300 Peter ScAu,z VS. Geo " Johnston. APP
peal Continued.
$3.50 J.. Marks "a VI Schmidt Same.
347 Peter DonleNy vs Thos Hurford As
sumpsi.. Dismissed hy plaintiff
34s Philip Goldman vs. Ruuedgc Thornton.
Same.
352 Cochran. Mclean * Co VS. The Estate Of
Chas Berry. Appeal. Dismissed Ivy plaintiff
31G Mary \ Treble Is Joseph Haas, Sr. Case.
Dismissed 10y plaintiff.
81 Lester II Jones, Il minor, by David ?
Jones his mex; lrca1, vs. David Walker ct al
Trespass Dismissed by plaintiff.
$50 lauc. pcnigan vs. Nelson Plumb and II.
4, Nichols. Apptdl Dismissed.
$50 u \ Rvtcr " Geo W and stephen NJ
Maciey Assumpst Defendants dcfaultcd and
Judgment for Stills.
S9l Richard Jones v John Deylnr Appeal
Dismissed by p.nintii at defendants costs.
394 Catherine Maher V Nicholus knauer.
Appeal continued.
39j Fritz Sicyan vs. WM and Eva Wedcman.
Assumpsit. Defendants called and deilulted,
and damages assessed AT s;i:;JIJ.
4Oj VIM Howard VS. Martin Ryan and Bridget
Larhiu. Assump,it Dismissed by plaintiff,
40G Chas Clifford vs. Bcliord and VI l.
Prendes@as. AasumpsIt Judgment FOR SOS y
and costs.
49, Hiram ii,lou y, Levi Sample aud Jer.
cmah KiDrr AssGmp.it. Judgment for II ,03O
and cotts against defendants.
49, " I BciI7 y, Chas T Taylor, Assump-
rt. Judgment against defendant for Sl53 and
costs
446 Hanaucr, Kohn * Co vs. Rosenhnupt Il
WeG.Ucim Assumpsit. Judgment Tor plain.
tills for +i0jiS and costs.
AZ Toml!Hsou x Co vs. jacob Chrstman. APP
peal. Judgment for plaintiffs for 5000
45f j p Brown x Go IS Ro,cnhaupt ~ Wer;-
helm. assumps,t. Judgment for plaintiffs for
2j0itJ and costs.
4c6 Jusms Bruck VS. j ChrI,tmaa Appeal
DISMISSED.
45o The Home liz, n, CO Of New York vs. {
HfrauG. same.
- VIM Jaca .ou Us W G and Joscgh Mosh
cr hssumrsi-, Judsmcntby cpiIession 10
Noi. ,r,.,.. al .r..,,,i co.. T,,.u 7 ,rN,,,,,.,.
ctgl. tssumi sir. Default and damages as,css
cd a. .!-j and costs.
4,s ramuol Nicholson vs. John McCouyiilc
As,pmp-L Judgment by confession for sl0i3l
and costs.
oHASCLEY DOCKET.
Joshua Collins Ct Tvs wm and Daniel Sin
CLAW IN chauccfy. Bill dismissed Tor want 0
prosecution,
Heinrich Gerdn- " VIM Ebert ct n De
cree.
~ YIN Morgan W Mary 4 Morgan. Divorce
Dismissed ior want 81 prosecution.
80 Joseph EuuN ~ Joseph Formulas. In
junction. Dismissed for want Of prosecution.
20 John aud Martha WiHdcrmuth v AarOr
and MIrgctia Ferguson. Adoption OF 4 child
Petition dismissed
20 Alice A Rogers ct al IS Orinda y Kellogg
Report of sale approved
A. owen " Hull ys Nelson Card and \ c Ne
Iut,rc. Injunction. Report of sale approved.
3. Z I, 7 Armstrong VS. The Brown IL NOrtO
PAPER Co. Dismissed for want of prosecutions.
20 Lucinda Howe ysJohn q Howe Diyofc,
Dismissed by complainant.
% Mary Ann and Elizabeth Jane Mowbry b
Sophia liircaau, guardian, vs. TAos Mowbr
etul Decree.
Eos BrunueT 4. Snow vs. The Northern Illno
Coal and Iron Co uf "a Sale. Mechanics hcl
Motion 10 vacatc decree heretofore entered an
dismiss bill OyeUuled.
40 The National City Bank Of Ottawa ct al
James Finley ct al Decree.
10 Mary { Swar;hout v James " Swarthou
Divorce. Decree.
l.G Emile Na.ile ys Catherine Naille d
yUrce Dismissed by complainant.
10 Phillip l!aei!er vs. John Walters ct
Foreclosure. Report Of sale approved
l32 Elizabeth " Hunter vs. Henry L llunte
Divorce. Decree.
l56 James Hitler VS. Martha Hitler. hi
m'ssel 10y complainant
l4U Eva Hcskernann vs. Barnard lltskc
mann. Divorce. Decree.
Ia A-nnZ- Known We ANN ElIza Brown I