National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1877-01-10
THE COURTS.
Supreme Court of the Uni.ed States.

et'Sfne Sottri OF tic United states,
no ON molten q Mr.. J; H.; Mitchell, Joseph N.
court hsr ssset VI 'ni'
~. molten Of MIR. [. S. Chatheid. Edward
Browne esq, of New York city, was al nittsd to
court. s'i VI 'n''
No. se1; The Board of Supervisors of w.
o. cause ~, :asni hssG
error Mr - . NJ i ~ r;P, Z sPooner and
N err ~, q II Pisnsx sor ne dsfendant
NJ, under the 10th rule =
n. MS ss, I, re R In%an Siesnshp Company sp;
the port Of New York. This cause was submitted
on printed arguments ey Mr.. F. L stetson, Of
der. for the appellee under the 10Th rule. : ''
Nc; 10y. George n. Bowen, appellant, vs. Mel
SON wease s Al The srEpTent Of this cause was
for the appellant, and continued by Mr.. James O.
Carter, for tie appellees.
Ad]ourneI until to-day at Il O'Clock. ~,
Supreme Court Of the District.
Chief JtIstice Cartier and Judges olIn, Mac
Ar,hvr and Humphreys ON The bench. -
1NpiVIDUAL RIGHTS AS TO DISTRICT APPOINT
DNTs AND THE POWER OF THE COMMISSIONERS
70 REMOVE EMPLOYEES. .# d..|
Speidan vs. Davis. Motion to reconsider; dis
The bankruptcy of Joseph Herzog. An order
Co.'s petition of April 80 ISIS setting aside order
Of bankrupt court and dismissing Turnbuirs
Philip Meredith VS.. The District OF Columbia.
This case is certified up from the Circuit Court
The plaintiff sets forth that he was duly ap
District Of Columbia, to hold Office during good
behavior, and entered upon the discharge Of hts
Duties as such and continued faithfully to dis,
February l, 1s74, and held himself ready and
and offered to perform said duties for the month";
January the DESCENDANT noti4sd him that he had
been dismissed from said service which was made
without any notification or charges against him,
for twoy months salary, at $50 per MONTH with
interest from April ], 1874 Argued by A. g..
defendant, and ,ubmitted Demurrer sustained,
and leave to amend the declaration. e.. ~. !.
n s. Davis vs. c. H. Holden. Reading Of
record. - a.. = LII S. a.. ..E - III
~. . aFrC Probate Court. nav 'a1 -F D
|. = -'E- Before Judge DIN. D..
Wills ApxITTED TO PROBATE AND RECORD
ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED. .-.I
In re estate Of .Bushrod Washington. Letters
testamentary granted to Silas Washington.
-. IN re estate Of Patrick Quigley. Hugh Quig-
In re estate Of Nicholas Nc CubbIn. Inventory
IN re estate Of John VI. Long. Elizabeth Bow
den appointed guardian. - ...t -'
IN re estate Of Z. s. Gather. Order made to
pointing administrator.
IN re estate OF CaseWeu Lands. Howard A.
Snow granted letters of administration.
Last will and testament Of Setro Bateman de-
ceased, partially proven.
Last will and Testament of J. W. Corner ad-
Last win and testament of John S. Blackford
In re estate of Louis Devers. Order to pay $50
10 one of the heirs.
In re estate Of George B. Stephenson. VIII
p In re estate of Thomas Lyndall. Letters of |
ADMINISTRATION granted Francis Mohun.
IN Re estate of John g. Strobell. Will ad- |
Last will and testament of George B. Smith
Last will and testament of Mary Morley filed.
In re estate Of T, p. Sawyer. Order Of sale OF
patent rights.
The court adjourned until Tuesday next, at IL
q. m. .. ..rN % o. --
Equity Court. -...
Before Judge WylIe.
APPROVING TRUSTEES BoND-INJuNcr1oN DE-
MED.
Castel vs.. McCauley. Sale vacated on petit
toner paying to Hayes expenses and interest.
Jewett VS.. Burr. Refusal Of E. Godfrey's offer
luohy w. Gately. Bond of trustee filed.
=: keyseI "; Haviland. Bond Of trustee, W. II.
Page VS.. Page. Bond Of trustee, A. FendalL,
filed. t.I.-l = 80 = u. -
Mcdaniel We. Halves. Vacation of pro con-
ftss0. -.-.r-r- e. - ., -
Transere vs.. Moulton. Injunction refused
Borland ct al VS.. Borland ct al. Mortgage Of
lot square l9I. authorized. -..a. - .r."
Booker We. Stewart Consent of reference to |
auditor to state account. >. - = |
Waugh vs.. Morgan. Glen W. Cooper ap- |
pointed trustee. .-'.l
PyweIl vs.. PywelI. Decree of divorce, giving
he defendant custody of child, and privilege to |
,esume her maiden name.
Court Calendar for To-day.
SuPRENElCouRT OF THE DIsrRIcr.-Nos Il
Hail vs. Davis; Is. Murray VS.. Ager; II. Bundy |
u. Boswell: H. Holden VS.. Linvilfe: is Boucher |
:. Haycocks Is Riley VS.. Church; 10. Basshor VS. I
iil6ourn; n Gunton VS.. Zantzlnger; IL. Lazenby
s. Webster; rs. Straining VS.. Walker
Fletcher VS.. Fletcher; II CaiIan vs. Callar: IA |
3oyle Va Shepherd; 10. Sparks VS.. Sparks: %.
paldiDg VS.. Riddle; q. Parker Vs. Oien: % |
Vorthington vs.. Marquis; %. Bigeiov VS.. Con-
ecticut General Life Insurance Company; "A. |
:ller VS.. Begging; p Johnson VS.. Ripley ct al.
CRININALCoURT. before Judge MacArthur-
he second trial of VIM. H. Ottman, indicted for |
ob5ing the United States Treasury Of 81 900, in
pill, 1874, $