, 1877-02-14
Grain spoonlators Must Keep Their Mar
gins Good, or Take Their Chances
Of Being Sold Out.
Tho National Bank Of Commerce Stirring
Up tho Defunct Stock IT. Mutual
Insurance Company.
Eew guits, Judgments, Confessions,
Bankruptcies, Etc.
SUPREME COURT.

~, uo0 hsmaees IoF 1n1uflof shstaiueo " inc dfs
ceased while walking along the track OF tho 1lnos
CentFa| Hondt 1etween twenty second and Twenty
foasth Streets It Happeasod ttat tlc g'fl was Walk
Ing on inc ttack wIthout permission at point out
side Of tho crossing whero tho Supreme
Conrt held that she had no Fight 10
be, and that her being there maao
ronr, ain hcII tbn, In M f,ot;,no mi s- ~. n,
eouis aso saa '"a., ~ IN. 'oox,ns ON .os !o ap'
rcacc; that ttcro urs nd dcarcca Of gross ucsli.
S,ncn: That anhouoh tho co,nnary NAV h,y, hctp
sutltv Of ncalIvenco In runnlnr fa,icr than Tho
girl was 30 great that thcfo could bo
no. no 'esSse'y by her. personal ,sg sspre,sos ,
nss' .,"',. '>''.oa , nv .o"of ,,.L,t ev".t
was, uele1ofe. reversed. 1nh,ee "a,ser
ey, willie dissenting from tho reasoning Of tho 70.
malnlns Ju.ticos In solno part. Of Tho opinion,
agreed with them substantially in tho result.
.lawrtnec, Campbell l. Lawrence for appellant;
Charles r. Adams Tor appellee.
The fasts In this case nro that yunhcr made "a
which uaueoek ct al, wrre tho Tras,Ses
uni1 .,o au,l wns hronrht IN tho 1nwcr
cuart I against thu VS. r,.,sss s' lnalv,aa1 @ t'"s' to
recover fur unpald rent, funkcr gaining the
case. The snpre'nr cour. held that there were
coveEant In tho lease 10 pay rent purport 10 be
covenant Of the defendants Individually; and.
oonzca au +, ~. ~ ,cs, .r1 on h
,rsro inv ,,s,, ,as,a ~ -; '1v a,snn 80 .ne 'sase;
upon Il. II was claimctl BY tho appellant that Tho
Trustees wrrc n,yi0unl,y liable On tho urpun, that
,sss5n s s4t' rs s,nYsns St sy,sy aa VI, q
T. III tnft IL sfs T,sss ssss s ;'fs d. q spa @
nv ns,.o o bresi upu s ae eoycnants N Snann s II Il
io irnse. Thu decison Il, tic lower Court IN fuyur
Tua,l' ur.uu.,slasa Eao:ry WanhSufn. ~ far
appellants. -.
prAnons-srnEEr EXTENSION:
tho s,pfee c5uIt da an opoM Of jajss slsio mSm ,n
thy cnsq Of Guild W. Tb9 Civ Of th,ca9o. rhu h,
va sh a t,1 hsaFa L. the
peai Wa taken to thu Supreme Court anI judemcnnt
ao5
tic opinion Jets for,i that iho case Il ono Of un
appeal from. ths Judgment of thc Supertur Court
s.1rn .tles. aS ss neson 'at to ~
stsest, Tho appcsi was hear.l In the Sanrcn,s
gSa5t st as September 1s pua
les6 I'LL 1 s sn of e m eGow ho o M
tho iowsr court that tic asscs:n,tnt was not @ con:
speesi ior ioesi 10 e
shus @ tho sI VIII eontguous ''s II ussI ,f''I. II
s. s. A.: A. ii & ~ Sass.;st!sa !, de-.
eial iasatIon. 1ehcafns was rrautsd. and M S t's
former nningan and ariMs,t tho aee,nct ~ tnns s
1rmatiun, The ufcsent onjnlon uitfcrS from III,
not rcutirs that spccia asscss,cn MS si,aIi i" s,
nnc5 Il rnntlrtn,it nr0nrriy hmt thnf inv shoniI
1ttcI. sictbrr rnntIt,,,s nr mi. srGs ynsMGr
Oplnip,t was at tla lino or ia IsliYcry nuifi.hnI
Iii thess COLUMNS
yAKo1, WAIVER OF i CONTRACT WITH nRrrn-
rNrr r., f.4v,I 10 Ta1tr
In III, ensr NJ We.1ny WnrrJi, nmnrl,n+ .. ~
H. coshonr sni ntII,r1' tI,s ~, ntrr mnrs y. ,n ~
rrhcs .inn havm IntnIv otn,nsc1 XIII. Sor. VI IT,
cIson II the s es... L sesns tat IN uIy ufsf is9i
II nlnhn nos,s,Iaio "'t ~ H. ~; Goy anH ~, X:
scrc. in Iiydc i.nIs fhc n1,cn VII sltx, o ny ~
shi, V,ti fSn ~ - . j., H. Nv t te e. ~ s, s1oo, w. u.
Uf ~ MI vss In ho W uo ~ ~ M H.
ss iii va. 10 hS od n vo ~ ,nnm, nt
ftst.o tt ~ t,e IN " p"t IL -. h ~" @ RE-
an in the pnrshass snna II ha furai.sa
~ 1a,1 hx '' tnsr,ns .s,.r, nra aa aut"l.M.a I,s
tnicho,, .or,,I ,IPafa,s us ,o5.ansemEnt VIII
and i,nlshonr E;n,nf.hoa oeoah H. Inf"y y,
II noo nil ~. IN -c!,n! w.. atat,x ~ .as ruahs
H. Hssa III Ia ea nio ~ Tas y Cpns!a4Sa @ H.