The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1877-12-08
CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CO.
DECEMBER TERM, 1877.

The December term of the Circuit Court for Bal
timore county commenced at Towsontown on Mon
day, his honor, Chief Judge GrasOn on the bench.
The original docket, numbering l6l cases, was
called, and two cases of Shipe, Cloud Co. VS..
Wade & Chapman entered satisfied. The trial
docket, numbering 303 cases, was called, a num-
Der of cases continued, and other disposals made
as follows: Ellen Nagle VS.. John Green writ
uuashed and case dismissed. Judgments of non
pros under the rule were entered in the following
cases The National Mechanics bank of Baltimore
vs. Geo. w. Burton Peter Butler VS.. Frederick
Ballard Charles II. Bayne VS.. Thomas Bayne;
same vs. Samuel w Bayne; same VS.. Francis M.
Bayne; G. W. Aulthouse, use of Mrs. Adeline
Aulthouse, VS.. John T. Graham and Charles A.
0akford, and same, use of same VS.. John L. era
ham and Jos. r. ii. Graham. In the following
cases Judgments in favor of plaintiffs, by default,
with leave to extend, entered: Joseph Free
man VS.. VIM. M. Binglng; Frederick h. Ballard
vs. Charles L. Foster Micha A. Winchester VS..
Daniel'Parkhurst the Chicago portable track and
car company vs. Jos. H. Allen; George Lang VS..
David Ilildebrandt VIM. +. Weller VS.. VIM. Sui
livan; George w. Bowers VS.. Richard S. Crooks;
NJ Lowenback & Bro. Susannah Burnham;
John A. Codori VS.. Edward Lieben Joseph NJ.
Atkinson VS.. Samuel 0ler, Jr. the Popplen sill
Gated fertizing company of Baltimore VS.. A. Fer
guson S. Frankinstein & Son VS.. Philip wagner;
same VS.. Jno. Rau; Jno. M Peacock d Son VS..
VIM Rousey Sidney 0. Heiskell VS. Henry M.
Iiams, for costs Jacob Fifer VS.. Allen Atkinson
Jas J. Given VS.. Francis B. Croft, executor of
Abram B. Croft, to bind assets; Freeland Hall
Co. vs. Edward T. Powell Ephraim W. Meutzer
and David B. Rothrock VS.. Jno. ii. Gardner
Joshua Horner, Jr., VS.. Atwood Blunt; NJ. Wurtz-
burger & Haas VS.. Elizabeth and Jno. huffman
Martha J. Roberts ct al, executors of Henry 7.
Roberts, VS.. NJ. p. 0'Hern Alfred S. Garrison VS..
VIM. T. Howe and Nicholas H. Bull Mary j.
Eppey, by her next friend, Thomas NJ. Lanahan,
VS.. James NJ Eppley Bickford Huffman VS..
Thomas z. Offutt and Robert B. Taggart; Joshua
Horner, Jr, VS.. Geo. w. Bower and Isabella Bow
or, and Charles Taylor VS.. Lemuel Morris, admin
istrator of Susan Taylor to bind assets In the fol-
lowing cases judgment by confession in favor of
plaintiffs were entered John I. Johns VS.. Peter
Mulceston, for S66.33 VIM. F. Weller. Noah
Worthington, on terms to be filed; r. X. Hawley
& Co. VS.. John C. Sullivan & Co., on terms to be
filed Edward w burlington VS.. John T. B. Dorsey,
on terms to be filed same VS.. G. BOhn Slingluff,
on terms to be filed, and Joseph Bergman VS.. Jno.
G. Sullivan & Co., on terms to be filed. A. A.
Elder VS. Charles W. Kroh and Mary Kroh, adj
mnistrators of Daniel Kroh off. The County
Commissioners of Baltimore county VS.. VIM. M.
Isaac and Ephraim B. Almony; offa to Almony.
j. Robert Ward VS.. David Cross; settled.
The magistrates appeal docket was taken up
Tuesday and the following disposals made; S. IL.
Grafton VS.. Benjamin Kendig, Jr; appeal from
Justice Quicker; Judgment below for Kendig for
$1,000 reversed. Nancy Wisner, by NJ. Wisner,
her next friend VS.. Thomas J. Gorsuch appeal
from Justice Cooper; judgment below that plain
tiff pay ST. ~ COSTS referred to VIM. C. Sparks and
Thos. Kelbaugh. S. J. Myers Mary j. Kidd
appeal from Justice Cross judgment below that
plaintiff pay S6.10 costs reversed and judgment for
plaintiff for S6510 and costs James NJ. Eppley
VS.. officer Smallwood appeal from Justice Cole;
judgment below that the COW taken up running at
large be returned to the owner npon payment of
$685. expenses appeal dismissed. Same VS.. same
appeal from same; same disposal as above case. d.
II. Barnett VS.. John Chles; replevin appeal from
Justice Pole judgment below for Chiles for
turn of property replevied, one cent damages and
$685. costs affirmed. ]. Henry Smith VS.. Henry
C. and Catharne Pairo replevn; appeal from
Justice Smith; judgment below for Paro for pro-
perty replevied, cent damages and $40 costs;
affirmed.
William Price VS.. Hannah J. Baxter; appeal
from Justice Weirs Judgment below for Baxter
for property replevied and $751 costs settled
John Y. Day VS.. Benz. +. Taylor; appeal from
Justice Burton judgment below for Taylor Day
to pay S1.55 costs affirmed. John Rooney VS..
John c. Evans; appeal from Justice Cole; judy
ment below of condemnation for Sll.25 and $500
costs quashed by consent with costs to appellant
L. b. McCabe VS.. Patrick Mullony; appeal from
Justice Miller; judgment below for $S9.49 and
Sl.4O costs; reversed without prejudice. David
Hoshal VS.. John L. Ensor; appeal from Justice
Miller; Judgment below for Ensor for $25 and
S1.4O costs; appeal dismissed. John Stock VS..
Joshua Wisner appeal from Justice Beckley
judgment below for Wisner for S42 and $6.05 COSTS
reversed each party to pay his own costs. Nor
decai G.. Cockey VS.. Rakestraw and Pyle appeal
from Justice Beckley judgment below for Rake
straw and Pyle for $3.50 and Sl.4O costs; revers-
ed without prejudice. William NJ Willis VS.. Mary
Miller; appeal from Justice Pole; judgment be-
low for Miller for S95 and $3.50 costs; appeal dis
missed. August Hoffman VS.. VIM. L. Richards
appeal from Justice Pole; judgment below for
Richards for property replevied, one cent damages
and S7.O5 costs; reversed and Judgment for return
of property, one cent damages and costs. Stern
heimer & Bro VS.. Boston Fear; appeal from JUS
tice Pole judgment below for Fear, plaintiff to
pay Sl.30 costs; affirmed with costs to appellee
Israel r. Heacock VS.. Robert Taggart; appeal
from Justice Dorsey judgment below for Taggart
for properly replevied; one cent damages and costs