The New York herald., 1877-03-17
COURT OF
The following 10 q
10, on which day J
2l2, 2l3, ia, 215. 2l
UNITED STAT
ES SUPREME COURT.

No Is. Original Casey vs.. Galli-This action was
brought pursuant ot order OF the Comptroller Of the
Currency enforce The individual liability OF CALI
shareholder in the Sow Orleans Banking Association,
national bank, that having failed, Is being wound up
by Casey receiver. The involves the following
y ae action should not be in equity
instead OF law, and Fhether sustain tho action
law sufficient to aver necessity OF enforcing
tho liability, and thG such necessity has been deter.
mined by the comp troiler Of the Currency, without
whether tho neccssf exists whether tho determina-
0i the COmpu Tier that II necessary to collect
from tho stockhod the entire amount lor which he
is liable is concN stvo upon the defendant without
averring the amour IT for which no Is liable; also,
whether by any sta TO authority gwen In the charter
OF "a state bank ITS ,rectors may change It's character
to that OF national bank and whether the Comptro
lcrs certificate oncusve as 10 tho organization OF
the national bank G. Case and Rouse l. Grant for
plaintiffs; Carlisle y Mcpherson for defendant.
No 49, County OF Dallas Mckcnzic--Error to tho
Circuit Court Tor tn Western District of Missouri
This action bonds issued the county
In aid oi the Lcced ana Fort Scott Railroad Company
The allegation is ,rr egularty and fraud the
The Court below So stained the validity OF the issue OF
tho bonds and the ounty brings the case here defend
ant error not appearing. Case submitted on the
printed briefs OF III paintn In error by John T. Ellis
and William Patrlc K.
No lsa Mackm d vs. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal
Company-Error % tho Supreme Court OF the District
OF Columbia is action IN cJectmcnt TO re.
part OF squ No. in the city OF Washington
brought by the Gu nal company. Tho defendant below
claimed under at Ax title offered TO prove the facts
vesting such tit 10 IN him, but the evidence
Jectcd IL Is her insisted that this and that
the liability TO IL rfcurc OF franchise having been in
Cured by tb plaintiff below II should not
have been ao we'd 10 recover. II had forfeited its
cnartsr by non. uscr and could have standing in
Court, and II sad necessary IN such case
70 prove an abs 0utc forfeiture OF tue chartcr oy judi
cia decision, being sufficient that the
pany has itself induce the belief that
u has aoando ned Its grants e. lngc Tor plaintii IN
error; W. 5. ,ox tor defendant.
No 1s4 Me- .ckail VS. richards ct al Appeal from tho
Supreme Cou RI OF the District Of Coumbia-This was
ccdors all by the appeliecs to subject certain real
estate n Wa shington the satisfaction OF Judgments
obtained nE ainst the appellant The claim was that
Macka owI led property in fact, but had not had
ns deed rec orded, purposcy to conceal his tc Tho
Court suss ined the right follow the property into
his hands the land ordered 10 be sold TO sat
isiy the JUG gmcnI II s hero urged that under tho
facts dscls rule OF law equity warranted the
decree an that 1t must be reversed. Z. Sccgc for
appellants u W. Il. Webb and Thomas wilson Ior ap-
No 1s5 Bcai ct al. vs. White ct aL-Appcal from
tho Supr' mc Court Tor the District OF Columbia
was atcst creditors holding deeds oil trust
upon thu personal property the hotel IN Washington
Guy kno wn the ST. James and tho landlords OF the
place to the right OF the creditors to have priority
awardo them cir deeds OF trust over the liens
Tor rer The Court below susta aned the decds OF
trust and II is here contended that the Items OF the
landor IDS should have had precedence and mat the
! decree was therefore erroneous. W. d. Daviogo lot
| appel ants; E. Tottcn for appellces.
On motion OF Mr. Z. T. Wheeler, IL. Edwin Tre.
main, OF New York city, admitted TO practise as
an al .ornoy ami counsellor Of this court.
Cai 70 No. S42. The Continental insurance Company
Kast s.-on motion Of Mr. Enoch Tot,cn. in behalf OF
cour sc Tor plaintiff In error. dismissed, with costs
liant g. vs. Elias T. White ct al Tho argument OF this
cau 10 was continued by Mr. Enoch Toiton, OF counsel
for appeees, and concluded by Mr.. W. d. Davdge for
app ollants
ian L. Gilbert ct al This cause was argued by Mr. X.
r. Merick, OF counsel for plantin III error aud by Mr..
| Hi Ii Burgcvn for defendants In error.
| NO. 1s7. d. Freeman Poole ct nj appellants, VS..
D hnle Tyler, claimant, ship Editb &c This cause was
al pued by Mr. A. Wilcox. OF counsel iOr appellants,
| AI nd by Mr.. y. p. Wheeler Tor appeIees
No. 1s9. George and Mary Il. Lie.z appellants,
onn T. MitchelLrhc argument OF this cause was
ommencod by Mr.. Francis Miller, Of counsel for the
| = ppellants
Ii EAdjourned until Monday.