, 1877-09-14
Court Docket,

convened At this place on Monday 'he io'h
inst.
CIVIL ACTIONS.
Waterman and katz vs.. Balch &
Balch; claim, fi39@ on promisory
NOTE. Bradshaw and Inman for plaintiff
Oliver Hall vs.. W. T. Armstrong;
sale OF real estate for confirmation. Nc
Naucht & Haller for plaintiff.
w. G. Smith, vs.. A. S. Miller; suit on
account $40. Bradshaw s. Inman for
plaintiff and II. G. Struye for defendant
ID. w. Miller vs.. II. Barker, on ac-
oount, slG3. Branshaw q lDman for
plaintiff.
G.. o. Haller, vs.. David Kimabll, on
promisory note OF $500. G.. NJ. Haller
plaintiff and ID. w. Smith for defendant
G. A. Meiggs, VS.. Marvin Minnick u Go,
on account $363.75. McNaught s. Haller
for plaintiff.
Terr. Wash. ct al II. W. Whtener, vs..
S. V. Boyce. Action to oust from office OF
assessor San Juan county. Bradshaw u
Inman tor plaintiff and d. W. Smith for
defendant. an#
B. F. Hostetter, VS.. Hastings Bros. Den
nison & Blanchard for plaintiff.
Hovey VS.. Hovey. Divorce. Brad
shaw & Inman for plaintiff.
Geo. Barthrop ct al, VS.. S. Garfield, ct
al. On account. d. w. Smith tor plain
tiff.
VIM. Craswell, VS.. G.. B. Dodge. On
note of $lO7. d. W. Smith for plaintiff.
Hawly, Dodd s. Co. vs.. James Jones, on
account. McNsught and Haler Tor plain
tiff and II. l.. Blanchard for defendant.
Milton Lemer appellee, VS.. James Wat
son, appellant. McNaught and Haller for
plaintiff,
Mary Fowler, executrix estate Of K. S.
Fowler deceased, vs. John Bell on account
OF $40. Bradshaw & Inman for plain
tiff.
VIM. Craswell VS.. Merrill Whittier, OIL
note OF $l65.75. d. w. Smith tor plain
tiff. \
Werthemir & Bros. VS.. Fl. L. Sutton,
$3.50 on account. Bradshaw s. Inman for
plaintiff.
Robert Fisher, llbellant, vs.. the Portu-
guese ship Tarresina Ferreyra Respondent
Nozaro Soils, claimant. McNaught &
Haller for rlibellant and Bradshaw 6 Inman |
for claimants. - gsFrr
g. o. Haller VS.. G.. II. Foster. G. M.
Haller for plaintiff.
Waterman q Katz vs.. Mai. e. Elwood
and James E. Murine. McNaught &
Haller for plaintiff. ls,...rs.
Newton & Keynes vs.. Fl. l.. Sutton. d.
w. Smith for plaintiff and McNaught &
Haller for defendant.
4. I. Minor vs.. j.. G. Ginger ct al
Mcknight & Haller for plaintiff and
Bradshaw & Inman aud Blanchard for
defendant. saJ Sa...sa lrs
Geo. Becker VS.. Robert Becker, ct al.
McNaught & Haller for plaintiff.
Ell Hathaway VS.. Dana NJ. Brown.
Bradshaw Il Inman for plaintiff and b.
+. D.nnison for defendant,
John r. Kirby VS., j. S. Conner. Hal
Ter Il Andrews tor plaintiff and Brad
slIaw& Inman for defendant.
Israel Katz vs.. Anderson g Pegs.
Bradshaw & Tnman for plaintiff and Lara
bee and Hall for defendant.
G o HalIerys VIM Hunt. G NJ Haller
for plaintiff. ~.
John Klnneth VS. NJ II Frost. Nc
Naught & Haller ior plaintiff.
The U Svs James w Ingersol ct al.
J.B Allen for plaintiff.
II. Thompson VS. II A Webster. H
J. Blanchard for plaintiff and II G Struye
for defendant. m'.u ,.s eoligs efe
JG Ginger ct al VS. T T Minor. Ii. L:
Blacharl aud Bradshaw & Inman for
plaintiff and Mcknight & Haller for de-
fendant. 9J.
t1EsheR CRIMINAL CAUSES 9EFN
The Uls.vs Robert Freeman, selling
liquor to indians. J B. Allen U s At
torney and MeNaught and Haler for
defendant a
USvs J w Ingeson, assault on high
seas.
Territory Of Washington vs. William
- So q
Gadlert selling larger-beer to Indians.
Territory Of Washington W. Peter
Thompson. W II White Prosecutlug-At.
torney aud Mcknight and Haller Tor de-
fendant.
Territory Of Washington VS. Chas Long
pray, selling liquor without license.
Territory of Washington. VS. Peter
Thompson, selling liquorto Indians.