The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-02-21
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURT-cnAMBERs.

by Judge Davis.
Buncr vs. Rowe; Barry w. Mcdonald; Dclancld VS..
May; Ferris VS.. Sage; Deyo VS.. Hutchins; Anderson
VS.. American shovel Company, Gulilan Va Mit,nacht
,ams; Philips vs. Mccioskey; Berry VS. Mcdonald !;
Rogers VS.. Maltby; Butler Va. Ha,ght.-Granted.
Dcvoe VS.. Devoe Union Dime Savings institution VS..
Wendell; Soleld vs. Hoffman; Lagc vs. Lockman; Au-
denreid VS.. Litchneid; Fowier VS.. Commercial Ware
house Company; American Shovel Company Keck;
National Tube Works Company VS.. Harway.-orders
granted.
Marx va Krooks.--urder granted discharging
ceiver.
Dctwillcr VS.. Bowen.-Motion granted
Ryan vs.. Ryan.-Mouon denied, without COSTS
In the matter OF McCoon.- No notice gwen.
Thompson w. Hasee Motion granted; case 10 be
put on short cause calendar Tor second Friday oil
March next.
ordered TO Mr. Albert sckney 10 hear, try and deter
mine
Bamberrer vs. Hyams-Motion granted; ordered
that IL be referred to Mr. George W. Parsons to hear,
try and determine, and take and state accounts, &C.
Cicary vs. Donovan.-0rdcrcd that motion stand
over the first Monday Of March. to be heard at the
same time with the motion for leave TO amend, &c.
SUPREME coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van Worst.
Dambnan vs.. Schuing.-Findngs and decree
COMMON PLEAs-SPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Robinson.
Grumm VS.. Moehring. Motion 10 strike out answer
as frivolous denied, with $40 costs.
Tilton VS. The United States Life Insurance Com
pany.-Mo,on to strike out part OF complaint denied,
with $40 costs.
Steinnarut VS.. SteinuaruL-DecTce slSneu
SUPERIOR CoURr--sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Spcr
DAILY vs. Munro ct aL-Judgment for plaintiff:
BY Judge Sedgwck
Donovan VS. The Board OF Educaton.-Ordercd on
Sondhcim VI. Hamburger. Order denying motion to
smith vs. Schwarzchild ct al-Order Diminishing
Davis vs.. The Broadway and Seventh Avenue Rail-
pInint g IN N sing I'D
Bayckcn VS. GOtsel OF aL-Ordcr denying motion to
vacatc order OF arrest
Wilson Davis-Ordcr denying motion and va.
Hindckoie VS.. Lang ct l--Ordcr that commission
Wedcmcyer vs. wcdemeyer. Of reference to
Hon, John NJ. Barbour.
Richardson VS.. Hooper; Meyer vs. vilmar; Clifford
VS.. Dawo; Lord VS.. Allen, and Wilson vs. DAVIS
Orders grained.
MARINE CoURr-CHAAfBERs
by Judge McAdam.
Dcxheimer VS.. Ulrch. Tho cause OF action set forth
in the affidavit on which the attachment issued
debt itself and not tho mortgage. 1t is sufficiently
stated The IN Sd n Y. 264, has therefore no APP
plication. The proofs show the debt is unpaid Tho
IN 40 Barb 1jS, has therefore no application.
These embrace all the objections urged Motion de-
MED; no costs.
vs.. Hitz; Schotte VS. Hamilton.-Motons granted.
wylie VS.. GibDs.-Order to pay over moneys.
Reynolds Hermcs; Pairo VS.. Evans; kohn VS..
Enrich; Loem VS.. HOne-Dcfaults noted
Dyer VS. Fccr.-Moton denied; no COSTS
Arnold Vs. Allen; shngcrland VS.. Hardie-Commis-
sions ordered.
O'DonnclI VS. Kahn; Ncwschaler vs. Hirt; Lewis VS..
Major.-Complains dismissed
Fignoct VS.. Haverty; Se,ovcr Lowenthal; Tucker
VS. Sheridan.--Sec decision filed with papers.
Stuber VS.. schwarlz--Writ of inquiry granted.
Leslie Bl0omburg. oil publication granted.
SAUCER VS.. Setgas.-Attachment ordered.
Ego VS.. Wood; Emnens VS.. Bchrenz Coin We. Solo,
mon Hans Tilley; Daunenbauer VS.. Stronss; Cud.
berth vs. Keeno; C0inte Ponsloll; Ryan vs.. Far
ley; McCau.ry vs. Qun,on; Clip VS.. Dillenberg-Or-
dcrs granted
BY Judge GOepp.
Rogers vs. Reeves settled.