Essex County herald. [volume] (Guildhall, Vt.) 1873-1964, 1877-02-10
GEO. n. DALE, Sol.
IN CHANCEkY.
i
STATE OF VERMONT, Essex County,
Esseg County, IS. March Term, A. d.

STATE OF VERMONT, Essex County,
1877. ''''' ''"'''' 90 i'H ' ~
THOMAS P. PROCTOR VS.. WILLIAM REY.
NOLDS and KATHARINE REYNOLDS.
Whereas, Thomas p. Proctor of Boston in the
county of Suffolk and Commonwealth of Mas
sachusetts has filed in the clerks office OF Essex
county, his petition, setting forth in substance:
That William Reynolds and Katharine Rey-
nolds, his wife, Of Brighton in said county of
Essex, on the goth day of August, A d. 1873. duly
executed to George b. James of the same Boston,
a mortgage deed of certain land situated in
Brighton, Essex county, Vermont, described as
follows, viz:
"Being part of Lot No. II of the first divi-
sion of lands in Brighton, beginning at point
on the line between Lot No. rs and said Lot No.
II, where the northerly line of the Atlantic and
st. Lawrence Railroad crosses said line between
lots numbered rs and II; thence running north
fortyeight degrees east to the Old town or Charles
ton road about ten rods; thence along said road
south about thirty-one degrees east, eight rods
thence south forty-eight degrees west, about ten
rods to the railroad fence; thence along said
railroad northerly to the point of beginning, and
being the same premises decided said William
Reynolds by Elijah w. Young by deed dated May
5, 1873.
Conditioned for the payment of a certain prom
ssOry note in writing signed by the said William
Reynolds, dated August goth, 1873, for the sum of
five hundred dollars, payable to the said George
b. James or bearer, in three years from date with
interest annually, which is now justly due and
feet Of the same, except that said Reynolds has
paid about ninety dollars thereon.
And your petitioner further alleges thu said
mortgage has been duly assigned TO your petit
toner.
Wherefore the petitioner prays that the equity
of redemption of the said William Reynolds and
Katharine Reynolds his wife, in the premises
may be foreclosed agreeaby to the provisions of
the seventy siXth section of chapter twenty nine
of the General Statutes, and that the Honorable
Court of Chancery will make such other and fur
Their orders and DEGREES in the premises as shall
appear just and reasonable. And it being made
to appear that the said William Reynolds and
Katharine Reynolds are out Of this State so.that a
subpoena cannot be served on them notice is
hereby given them and they are hereby requ rsd
TO appear before the Court of Chancery, next to
be held ut tiuildhall, within and for the county
Of Essex, on the third Tue sday of March, A. ID,
1877, then and there to make answer in the prem
Uses and abide snch orders and decree as shall be
made therein, and the petitioner is ordered to
cause the substance of his said petition together
with this order to be published three weeks sue
cessiyely in the Essex County Herald, a newspa-
per published at Guildhall in said Essex county,
the last Of which publications to be at least
twenty days previous to said third Tuesday of
March, 1917.
Dated at Guldhall this Both day of January,
1877.
CHARLES e. BENTON, Clerk.
GEORGE n. DALE, Solicitor B