, 1877-02-06
An End to the F1aglor- Wadhams Suit..-
An Express Company Rebuked.
Tho Chicago 4 Evanston Railway Pro-
poses 10 Fight for Its franchise.
Record Of Judgments and New suis--
Divarees aud Bankruptcies,
TAX GASES,

only includes The net daraagcr, liz benefits 10 ii
ynsl2ns tracts having been acdne.cd:. Wc do NJ
construction commended for; tho Hoard Inn III
powcr to condemn and Offset damages " benetltl
and when this oeenr. The actual eosl VI tho Fask
lcneats 10 atccrtainlng the eost Of tbs park "
&c no.n,'ng IN the angnage Of thy act from wh1e
b. considered except whatis rcqufrclto 10 actuai
ii Is ur.el that this enlargement Of the cost h.
The supplemental net (which VIVA not, As Tho or!El
nal act submitted to a voto) il void. The It'll
aet fs dcc1ared TO bo public law, and ss enter
laiurc TO amend 1t without submitting the amend
nent 10 vutc.
!. T. a1so urged t.st tho ss.etnont I. void bc
n Improvement In par. in Tho Town i jedcrson. ~
1a.a An IN In fpp9,ss ot shs e aFe referred tS III
The,e l,defencc Sotaesn s1'n sa Fsas east
5ssns5 SaS Of s tso oTas ses va as H.
ss$ s%n ~ s?t 'S"o "a H.
sdea"s 1iit ;te. p:Tfss:t Tss s,te..men' n 1
coat 1as doe: ne sngGne HIS 6
portion Or TIE money to be raIre In ono town Il 10
tewn to- 1an1sSE,a St @ tofa n another
elndes tho eost of tho boulevard IN ths Town Of Of
7 sy no means toews !at the
91hat expen.e sa for aast ,hat appeart a vS evory
rttv IL may 10 assessed upon tho prop.
tbs question a. tn the,c hcnr m ovtdo,,. ~,
lhe property assessed bcnc1tcl to tic amount
GIrmlt tnnrt c,l,ncs now 20 esiseds as tho
appeal lsas been takcm from ny ,bo 1ccscn' ana no
T. y also argued Tint the notice eren Of the ap.
sor. van not J." NJ G GoaTt to arpont Asses-
sion Ills act renare Tic notIce I'll !" r. H. t.s.
tnowapapsrs to% ana tho general law tequftod pubea-
These notices WsS nii.hc1 ,e,3 Ky 3 3Wness M r.
1Dth day Of any. 1840 Tho nit ct,e VA on NJ III. III
M. IT, H. o H.! t1s exs on sasnrsoy the I'll; this
week publication ws maJc ench tlo1 ,rh;s is s3s
tho sscond week. and + was also lnae on Monday
fu, wenks d Il M. ,Ho oan.a ,nsd Wses. 4 to three
lsst and last insertion. nor does the seadnr oi thS
ttafnte require y; Endst tie decision Of Pearson
lint iho nStica p;rs .cs We oto nGnG.. Y hold
with tho statute. '~' ~0''p''D's'
o,.. next =, 9ontenlca that the Aasessors llnd no
noMcf Sn 10 ase bnt one a.:easncnt Il they had
would .nyo ,o ,nn.rs ~ ~ ,no re. W1io ~. neats they
agaI ut tic act cxpressy "ni.or,o. 4c aa's asoan1
70 divide tho amount Of thsir assctsnen.. aud. ss
urged that tho d. ior tic rst raYcnt ar. -
n dividing ~ entire amount into annai s ia'tall
utsswso npnelIant; csn wt1n The he net IT. were It
:outt. or tako axamtsnn " mag n'aae " tfe olEntt
LATERAL proceeding. - 'AN'' "'''e'' ~ col
" noxt urged that Tho notice Of tho nnn,,eo,ton
ios sSds1gnt was lnsu!seut Tho assrrtnen. II
fnms"e1 :, .sn ~ ne C!.cnlt Conrt nntti March, lb
IN" ~ %ntr IT, IT, srns; ~ 1871. and It
Ion 10 dc cony tarCof III. natef ihs coflrna.
mi he is to ,ucIda in ,a,nn n ~ hat ~ co"nty G!srk
INIT for ench yenr ,Ml ti,e aa,nn Il naid VT.
ratrant fus the collection Of tho taxes ftr iH7t d
aot Issue until after July j. 1871. Unsr ihsso s.a
:irsamstat.ces W. re- 40 reason why tho asscss.
@ wa hot psopetly Included In tlc warrant far
ds;l. athoash n%t actually duo until 49,: rio
yet II It'll not osct H., "H nays 5cen rregaa
ax, wc cannot ol I'LL ill., iaa.snt .ns''sv Gu. ef ts
judgment viii 10 ai,irn,ci. 0'''s ''pea!s' sho
j, r, 'Wnson .anr.orcA y,r ,,,a,,,u,.
,v,t,,.n, r. Yr.'t,a fps.a rs ,os ApPe''ahtS ahd
""''aa' IL Iio'aeh 1os appellee.
BEARS vs. THE PEOPLE.
The first question IL that the Sheriff. mil mt
te Collector, Ii The nrunor ncrson ~ ann,. ~. ~
Judgment, This was esIie IN T,,s1,', p'' ~ % ."s
feople, mid the Chicago t. Northwestern l,aIl.
road Company VS.. Tho Tcuplc, in 1878.
It Is nc1t urged that thp nrocec1u,, i,oea mn,
nrofr.s IN IN, f.,r 49, ..ts, fSsseS "ocs NV
t,,,1s ~ ~. ~ ,,s. .au .o.~ a.aoan1 uhe ot tho