The New York herald., 1877-11-29
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURr-CHAMBERs.

BY Judge Donohuo.
Pierce et al. vs.. Waters ct al-Interrogatores and
settled subject to all legal obec
BY Judge Lawrence.
Martin Low ensle ein.-The various blanks In the
petition must supplied and the petition verified.
United states Trust Company vs. Kely.-The
guardian ad litem who has consented IS not author
ized any consent. IL tho attorneys for tho
other defendants consent they should do writing
Brown vs. Grlswoid-The order Of November "a,
1877, was within the power OF the Court and, under
the circumstances, IL was proper that such order
should be made. Tho examination Will. therefore,,
proceed.
Nostrand vs.. Ripley.-Therc IL stated for
giving order 10 show cause.
Webster vs. StocKwclL-I do not think that O stay
shoulu be granted ON the appeal from the order Tor
the examination oil the defendant
Gustnal VS.. Reinhardt.--Deiault opened on pay.
ment Of COSTS before notice oil trial and motion COSTS
The case to be placed on the day calendar Ior first
Monday OF December
should be some record or affidavit before showing
the value OF the lunatics property, otherwso have
nothing 10 guide me IN determining the amount OF the
bond.
Felt VS.. Tifany.-rhe General term OF this Court
held IN Duncan w. De Witt Il Hun. p. lS4l that 10
authorize an extra allowance tho must be both
difficult and extraordinary; that II
thing unusual and be sucn as to require than
nary labor and previous preparation by counsel II this
case Is difficult 1t certainly s not extraordinary within
the rulo just adverted To. the action 10 brought
recover Tor services alleged to have been
70 the defendants and tho answer Is denial
OF the value Of the services aud that the planIn II y
claim had becn submitted TO an arbitration who had
made an Ia PLAINTIFFS iavor Tor much less than
tho planun claimed whicn amount, although ten
dercd, the plaiEtn had declined TO receive Tho dis
tinciun between this aud that OF Colin Vs. Cade
q Hun &c., Is that the Court hore bold the be
both difficult extraordinary undor tho decision In
Duncan VS.. Dewitt. | do not see how AN nllowan
can be granted herein. Motion denied.
Bum Farey.-lf the defendant Will give sccu-
riy TO be approved Of by the Court TO pay any den
cency which may occur IN the sale, nc Will DC allowed
In ana defend on condition that the Judgment
stand security, and upon serving his answer with
in tnrec days and ing notice oil trial tor December.
lie must an a furthcr condition pay the cost Of this
motion anu costs heore notice 0I trial.
Richardson vs. United States Life Insurance Com
pany.-Application granted.
Holly, sc, vs. Trepcn.- xplanation desired.
In the matter OF Mander-I wish to see counsel In
regard 10 this matter.
Kingon VS. McKay.-wny should not the ordinary
notice be giveny
Wolfe VS., Sullivan; Wilson vs.. Manhattan Lilo In
surance Company; Dake vs. Yate; Foit vs.. Tinany.-
Orders granted.
In tho matter OF Durfee; Wander Heuvel vs Ward
Mckenzie vs. Mckinley; Kahn Va. Suydam; Hotch-
KISS VS. Kelly; He'delback VS.. Borg; MUS Va Roder-
wald. &C.. McCocn w. Hamilton; McCoon W. Hamil-
ton ln tue matter of ZwiIe; Howell Va Buffalo Gap
Iron and Steel Company; Clapp va Davidson
Granted.
SUPREME CoURT-sPECfAL TKEM
BY Judge Van Worst
Niles W. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. decree signed
Weld, &c, Va strong o. sL-ExtrA allowance 70
plaintG OF $3.50.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERN.
BY Judge Larromore.
Jackson w. JacKson.-Deiault opened on payment
oi cVsLx.