The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1877-12-24
OUR TREATIES WIN 1EyTCO.

,,,.. ~ =, ,,r,,Lc II ,vnrwith
r,r,,I =, oycr, farm If Intrigue
a,,,, ", t',.,, rn,'r,s,n,o,ior IN consummntc
u.'t. .i.,',, 1'si.,. Tho r,,,,d,,i,.,t Admin.
t,,,i... 49,. 49,, ,,t,. I,,,,, nm o,,iv, moan, in
,,i. s,,',,,,, ,'r,,,,,c, hy sinis,.r and selfish
,no,ivos Lut # has uaur,n1 the war-mnkin inn
, Wv " 10 -, W. ,s', ~,
power Of Congress by iseuing orders which in
,,,. ara, II ,l4tnntinl dr.lnrntion of ,vnr
aud deserves impeachment Thus far the for
-, a. - 80
hcnrancc ana the prun'n''"l lu' h'Nl'ah Hu-
thoritios have nluuc saved the two countries
from actual hostlitics
Mr.. Evnrts hne nttomntod to Justify the scan
daous order Of the War Department directing
the Invosion OF Mexico ana the acts ol violence
"u''u pr'''u'u una su''''"ou un"' ",u''' ny
"oElhs uhcy were hu'hvr'Hcu ny "v''y' "s "
any n"''"h' III ,re"Y vi "'n"y' """'u N''""
|'"S 81, 'o""Vi us ''s"'7 -, tnS "','
i'uo,,nu.i'Vo 10 "no'noi' ""no"' von,,'''vn ",
vo'7'''''"''on " any N,n', WI hV"i'e INV
,'s l''" was u.'ounu''' w,un Nv ','''1' ~ ''i'''
oIara,i,,,, ,,,,,h ,o ,a,,,
ue'lnr"l"h' Whlch COMPROMISED 'le soVu l"i'n
VI .''9 "V'ei"iu'""
back nearly half century. and we shall show
10y the various treaties that there IL not "A color
~ nr.,ox, /, ,n,, ~ ,l,,a,, ,,hnriyr,, ,,orn,i,
ting or tolcruting the criminal violations of
Mexican territory that have been recently wit
messed First. the =" Treaty of Amity. Com
mercc, and Navigation with Mexico, proclaimed
April .. 1872" The following article is the only
one which has any reference to the question now
agitating the public mind:
Anrclp XXXt1r 1t /. likewise agreed tina, tho two
mns psrlirs al by an ,he mean, In neir loTcr
nation. who nhanii tnc land, adjacent to tho lines and
and the Ici,,r to attain Ia, object Go,, lind
and inc,r,i'n, on tie mart OF lie ind,,n nations u,ns
Uiig Hsr ,tyafls iosat i 80 that the United states
Of America will not sun,r their Indian. 10 attack the
ctr ns nf tho United Mexican State nor tie ininsi
State. prtn,i vi" Ii,1s rsldmi wiiin tp"r
T. comiu hostntics against the ciuzens OF the tutcd
liz limits Of the tinted siatos in ans manner wieieser
lhls article rs nothing moro than reciprocal
ollirntion 10 rrevcnt Indian incursi,ns which
IL imposed on each side respectively alike 10
be performed within it, own jurisdiction. Out
OF abundant caution. the very next article in
the same treaty provided mode Of adjustment
IN ease OF any iniraction. MS follows;
ARrictr XXxlv-Thrdly Iftwhat indeed canno, be- s.
.ha he Voated or nrac,ed IN any VI manner wRnt,cf
It stimulated that neither OF me cotTacnnr nare. viii
he other on complaints OF Injuries or damage umi the
.s S IT, si6r @ @ h'i nri. nave S e
and sS a.Sa aa P an g' a H have Cee er s
ri,,,s Z, ,,,..o.. ,,.a, ,,, A.. W.. ~.
linus appears iia' tne oruer oil inc war De-
partmcnt to cross the Rio Grandc in pursuit of
hlitSei raiders ana 10 oVertake ana PUNISH
men, was paipaole ana hagrant violation OF
.his "r',cie' even IL the complaints were wen
iouhu'u lns'e"u o' ooih. iaoi'e'''eu' as most oil
INN r "eie'
nv iv"S VI "u"u"iupe iiu"'So was pro-
N'"i'''eN u'' T. io'0 anu s''p"'"'e" "e ioio"s'
AsI,., Ins Inat great part Of the terri
hendcd Tor the future WITHIN the limits Of The United
s IT, snr he oS s" sr Of VIZ VIII msfs
OF he unit,a State ARR whose neprsions within The
It is .oemniy agreed that all such incursions aii be
I,.N I.sman,r 9S 'e ~oisrm.nt OF me im,eI
waen they canu, "a Tft1ts.ea :hty shall be punished
I4' s"I Ana s'asuon iYr ~. same
diligence and cnerfy. a. { the ,ame incurson. we're
i,s on eitiens "'''''' ' ." "s''"''
MI r-.,,., c,.... 49,. .,.u,.
restrain" Indian inrursions against Mexico.
while now the Fraudulent Administration or
ders military inoursions ~ ho n,ndo vii ,ho
design Of provoking n collision with IN. M.xi.
can authorities.
N"t "'''''. NO.
Tho Gadsl"n troatv Of 1888 pro lalmod Juno
30. lsji. followed. Of which the second article
- ,l,,,a
- r,. $50. -, v..,.. ,...,,. o..
ira,,s iie United state, rom an LIABILITY On account OF
TRINITY az tu.t4I.. l.f.o tn. .ttl ur.l.lt aud
ur thir, fnird artce OF mo treat, OF aui commerce
s r i't, VI 8, ' s,i, '''' i t Ao5 ON
The 9th day OF Apf1. 1891, ar' 'r''s o' "yn't
Hence. II there was the least shadow Of au-
| thority under the treaty Of 1891 ior the recent
| violent proceedings on tho Rio Grandr. AZ has
! been pretended ly Mr.. Evart- and the ,h"mors
I'm whose interest d. has acted from tho begin.
ming. it was ahroguiod nearly a quarter of d
century ago 10y the Gadslen treaty, and in III,
most explicit terms.
But this is notall The bad faith OF the d,
| faato Secretary Of State and his of ,ial confed
crates does not stop here Ii there was an,
ground OF complaint for wrongs committed b,
citizens Of Mexico. or by the Indians on IN,
| frontier. a mode WAS provided los the treaty %
peace of 1sls. which is just rs binding ON u,
| to-day NJ when II was signed. Here are til,
words:
Arr,,tr XIII. unhar,,lv any DISAGREEMENT ,houl
hereafter arie letw,en Oh, Go,ernment, ol The two re
anv ,un ION in tis trtnty or with re. rect 10 aiv oc
a,'g '. . ,e po Xxx or cgn,r.ia, rel.
o those nauor- DO tomi,c TO each other tat tho
~ ,'tt the n,ices so ar,mr and so Tr,"r, M