The New Orleans daily Democrat. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1877-1880, 1877-07-10
THE COURTS.
Fifth Instruct e,n,,rt

The Crescent City Live Stock Landing and
slaughter. House Company have filed a petition
me ruth District COURT against John auidry
| and y. Larrleu The petition Gets forth that the
corporation, by Its charter was given the srcln.
sive privilege of having all animals destined foy
sale or slaughter In the parishes Of Orleans and nd
Jefferson landed Ct its wharves, guarded In its
YARDS, siaughtered In its slaughter-houses, and
petitioner s entitled to recover the sum Of t25n'
That petitioner is entitled TO exact from every
steamship landing at it's wharves ten dollars. and
for each steamboat or other water craft Eve dol.
Lars; for each horse, mule, bull OK or COW for each
day Kept ten cents. and for every CALI hog, sheep
or goat five cents.
The company alleges that IL is entitled to one
dollar for every beef fifty cents for each hog and
call, and thirty cents for each sheep, goat and
lamb slaughtered in Its slaughter. house.
That IL has established slaughter houses on
the west bank OF the Mississippi river, which was
objected to BY the butchers, and being inconve-
niently established and at the request OF the
butchers IT. removed to the east bank of the
river, where IL now liz, in full capacity to accom-
MEDIATE all the butchers. That after said re-
moval some OF the butchers on the west bank
complained, and among them g,sJohn
6uldry and VIM. Kerner, and q litigation
was commenced, which terminated In decree OF
the supreme Court, which decreed that petition
era should establish slaughter house on the
west bank, where Guidry, Kerner and Larrieu
could be accommodated, and petitioner re-estab-
iished slaughter-house there Of a capacity to
slaughter 100 head per day, while the butchers
over there do not slaughter at any time more
than Ten.
Due notice Of the establishment OF this abst-
toir ON the west bank was given by publication
and personal service on the defendants. That
the rights and privileges OF
plaintiffs the defendants refuse to pen. yard.
shelter, land and slaughter at the slaughter
house and defy petitioner to compel them 30 to
20 and are indebted for such action in the sum OF
$3.50. The prayer ia for an injunction to restrain
The defendants from Strengthening snv animals
Intended for market.
An Injunction was granted.
IL. ". Soares has filed his suit which ives dis |
missed in the Fourth District Court now in the |
Flfth District Court, asking to be reinstated to |
)ersed of Judah.
United states District Court.
petition has been filed in the United States /
District Court by Will Steven and Emory e, Nor |
on, as assignees OF the bankrupt estate Of Jos. |
10y d Co.. against Jos. Hoy and Carolina Hoy, |
he Hibernia National Bank and Messrs. Jurey &
tarrls, claiming that the defendants should |
ring proceedings against the petitioners, In
rider that the rights OF the defendants might be |
ct up against certain real estate valued at $780,
W, in order that the property might be sold as
elopging to the estate.
United states Circuit Court.
A bill 10 chancery has been filed in this court
y bs
ymar, Elmore Dufour and T. Eastman. The
Ill alleges that in the November term, 1876, un-
er q judgment OF the court he recovered against
ymar the sum of s14,475 with interest The
i'll charges that writ Of fieri facias was issued
nder the Judgment and was returned unsatfs-
ed.
Aymar. it is alleged engaged in business and
lumber of individuals became indebted to him in
rge sums, for which indebtedness he holds Sc
lrities.
Further, that Emile Dufour holds property,
onds, ETC., belonging to Aymar. and in which he
as an interest.
The bill goes on to say that Aymar was re-
entity the holder OF certain mortgage note
rawn by Mary @. Boykn, dated April /, 1871,
ne in 1873, for $500, secured by mortgage on
srtain sugar plantation in the parish Of Terre.
onne, and that Aymar, without any considera-
on, delivered this note to one OF the defendants,
astman who brought suit upon IL Ia the District
curt OF Terrebonne in 1877, and that afterwards,
the request OF Aymar, he pretended to sell the
ote to Dufour by notarial act of subrogation.
The prayer of the bill is that an Injunction
sue restraining Aymar from making any assign.
ent OF his property and from confessng judg- |
ents in any cause for the purpose OF giving any
'eferencs TO his creditors, and that receiver be
,ponted,