The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-05-22


costs and disbursements. Opinion by Presiding Judge
DAVIS.
trial ordered, with costs to abide event. Opinion Ny
Presiding Judge Davis
Dradhurst VS. Townsend ct al, &c.-Ordcr reversed
with costs. Demurrer sustained. Opinion by Judge
Daniels
The People, &c. ex rel Connors We. Reilly -Cert-
orari and habcas corpus dismissed Reaior reandcd.
Opinion by Presiding Judge Davis,
by Presiding Judge Davis und Judges Brady md
Daniols
Albrecht vs.. Psll, &c judgment for defendant on
case submitted. Opinion by Judge Daniels.
Gray ana another VS.. Tho Central Railroad Company.
Of New Jersey. Order denying motion for trial
reversed motion granted, with costs to auide event.
Opinion by Judge DAVIS.
Wilton vs.. Spring Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Opinion by Judge DAVIS.
SUPREME coURT--cHAMDERs.
by Judge Barrett
Chase VS.. Chase.-Ordcr granted
DeniSe vs.. Tho New York and Rosedale Limo and
Cement Company.-I think the appellant should fur
nish n better surety than the ono objected TO.
Ward vs.. Bcntz-Grantcd but provision made for
public notice and Tor notice to the defendants
Flahcrty vs. Murray. Motion to confirm referees
report and Tor judgment grautcd; motion TO compel
the ming Of tue testimony denied
Lord vs. Dusenbury.--Motion granted and reference
ordered.
The Williamsburg city Fire Insurance Company vs..
Austn.Moon DENIED In all its parts with $40 costa
Marley vs. The ST. Louis, Iron Mountain ana South
ern Railway Company. Motion denicd land as these
motions with regard TO the details OF pleading are not
encouragcd) with $40 costs.
Haddon Vi. Tue ST. Louis. Iron Mountain and South
orn Railway Company. Motion donicd with $40 costs.
Our motion ca!endars arc sufficiently crowded with
applications OF real moment not be rendered entirely
Impossible by motions OF this description.
Robinson VS. The ST. LOUIS, Iron Mountain and
Southern Railway Company.-Moton denied with $40
costs Hardly any answer under the decision OF the
OF Appeals can be stricken OUT does not cncour-
ago motions TO strike out Irrelevant ana redundant
matter unless II Ia something peculiarly scandaous
BurrelI VS.. Keoncr 1t Is Impossible TO guarantee
that II the judgment be opened tho pIaintIn Will not
have the benefit VI the security which no thinks he has
obtained IN the courts Of Pennsylvania. lfths judg
mont should be opened condition that tho proceed
ings IN Pennsyivana should stand as security, the
court Of that State night disregard the condition, aud
the plaintiff might lose che benefit OF all he has done
there, and that ny tho meie opening vi Tho Judgment
Here II might be otherwise but would BIO unfair 10
subject the plaintiff TO any such risk. IL would DO d
fcrent u we had control over the Other proceedings
Upon the whole, and Ia view OF tho undoubted laches
Of the defenan hs ought not to DO permitted TO come
in except upon giving security for the claim II we
SECURE tho paintn here he Will not be projudicod by
the loss oil his Pennsyvana proceedings and yet the
defendant will have a day 10 court Tho motion
therefore, may be granted upon the payment within
ten days tho Of the Pennsylvania proceeding
and OF thus date and $40 costs OF this notion
and upon the defendant furnishing within tho hko