The Iowa plain dealer. [volume] (New Oregon, Howard County, Iowa) 1867-1895, 1877-01-26

- sAsstsaAAs fssasAssss ssaasa - asAaA ~
@s ~~@*s - s&s teAsA#asAAA VI tn*@aHsl
W. " W.. sss~tsM4y#s
ass*sSssHA sa#as sass* sr~h ss* ss*ss~ss !
ssssssss " ~ sAAFss* ssssw8ssss sH stAs
sesr " w. - n sssssa##s IN w. -
nTs~ssase h~s II t#aasee* r4sastN tsF##v NJ
Nss - tsasss*ssss SO NJ ewNssAsNK
:. z @*r So thss re fsF~s ssa sssasa9
sAN tseswe ss4s stsssss tsssHssa ssss ssss a..
r@s*a WE esass* IN sss tNssNAss ~ n wNA IL
asas Faa3ssf ta8 f.Xxtsss IN tss s38A III fsss w.
sNssxsN3 N~xvA sts vi ss#sfs tsss s4swsssa YssAss
Nfsfss~ hMA sssA tW#s8 SRA tM slSsa ssgssA
w5tn shs tStsssfss ~ sNs ttmsHsawest 4sssaf
rasaa ass#hA AtHh ~ sfaT sssMAs III As
/ II the ssts*~ ssssss
NJ Heat ssaa ls ~ss ssfarA ~4th ssssssAes.t
!hst Z ehsala ssf have fAilsn ~ esss ~ b. DO
~ ,,s,.;s. - ,ss~si 49, = - ss,s.n -. seasss
isad 4n~n Mi. lsrrssss.ssn sAn ~nssss.s
| IwNW hw Hssssse iMa III esnr~l tsse III
snrStises ~ Essas h AsHsnf M ihe ts~sstts
~ iasaa HtAse And hssng tsssHi te the llsnse h
n kslA Ar~HTiing ta II. wAaa. thss Vie sssae ~.
shnsft we I*fi~iAsnfs sf she wassr. hsA asss
w. - tisafssls ~ttIsn ~ luss&asssgas
Mf liAaA stA~a N 4 st.unsis ~ ~ s1s lsrsss
MI tsss We rasss h. saafhsaa The laEi@s~ ln
Cmsxs~A
~ Hear rsrllsa ,hs, tn r~~sa. ~hlea
wesv INV vcnxia fos ~str The rswtgis M lersl
eisesluns ard the seecSsie ulsscl trissui 10 ,hs
eslsisnrn ~ The ueycfnmens ef tie kiNse.
Nriseis hnuhtrd thai there ~A2 a rprt xin rasss
IN ssccssiA ~ which thr rfsnearic III hsa lsta
down sl'd not slsnl,. bar The f.eotls ~ sle
eleeslrsl of lras.slgn.sAl elssioss WIRE fceossis
essential 70 The preservation III tiie Tavern
went Asad sovereignty of the state it.sls. ana
Cnnffr~N hAi 10 right N lay hands on ilsens
MI efiiw them cut u the ttriltHs III tht
NJ. Hereford stated tia, tho tisase hsa
never nfdtrtst thr pAlct tn bc taken nns 10
lhe state. The Returning lizard hsI refused
even tc Allos III inslsetl VI them. Tile
ttKht of p~nfsle 10 inrpect rubllc pspsrs never
hau bern donbsei until toasy. Mhs MA il i
That " tvtiy ntage of tlsi- Investigation Tie /
!,snit rfAstc tsrts nct with obstacles Au,l uh /
cause fof yerfw pAAt Opssfnors coull i,e do. |
Mfohed, and no question. no oejeetiun no /
Ifusess cAtns frsm tho other siic. Icgi-ia. /
lures had boon i'sbAndcd. AMI yet he prpss~t
came from tho osh,r sie. lint now tho volcc /
~ tue people must and would 10 heard In dc
Gliding the gruAt question.
MI, banks said that lilo records demanded /
were tho records on which tito existence II I
she Nsaae Government and lilo Government ~
thc United bsatea dcpclded llc dciicd any
gentleman ~ Dnd in tue history ~ tho unissd
states single tnstancc In whial, such do
maud was tnasle. No man could Justify thc
objects Of Louisiana n they had gwen up their
rscCsds into irresponsible liAnd~.
Mr. houthard sAhl that In Tire fcrty.ns conL
ssa<ion the Committee on Eicctinns la Tho
nenAso had been ordered 10 lnau 70 whether
there was = htAte Government Ia l.nulsiAua.
and ll that investigation tho committee ann
mcnad % Washington naosnl,OfA ot thu Kellogg
ami McEnory Returning neArds Ai,i tne roc
nrds OF both pafllea had boon produced be.
fora II.
Mr. DAnAs replied sha. In tia, csse thu az.
!ssenco of tho Government III Louisiana LNi
bctu At stake. That Cove nnlent had hot been
established, aud tho question had been whistler
ono or tito othcs 0f these Governments shonll
- established. II would be conceded that on
40 record. demanded would depend tho
States. II they we're destroyed the orig.
imM evidence Of tlst election would
havs been destroyed. II they were nurron.
dsred np they wrfc surrendered (shey niAdc
40 impeachment on thu uommittcc) 10 abso.
lutsly Irresponsible parties. They might DO
accidentally lost or Intentionally destroyed. IL
those records weto lest by accident or ,ie.
MtTOycd by desiRn. tho only evidence that
txisss on which ths election " President u
fuunslul, aud tho Government VI tho United
otabllst,sd, wonld bo Ion. u destroyed. aud
manifestations Ut interest and applause. even
that yell whicl, had became historic. and
which wa~ heard yesterday, showed to whAt
extent sOtnU tnOn mot connected VI Ill tho
House were willing 10 10 Iii such I matter.
What wAs tho Foundation for this extrAosd
nary. unparalleled. aud unprecedented 10.
mAI,i, which wanld take from the Govern.
mant tho very eslienca And foundation On
which ltA authority and rlullt ~ oxisteuca
must bo bamed d. - public rumor and
whence did u runle ftum the part. inter.
Gated ~ the destruction ol tho of,g!1sl eyl-
ought neycr % yield thoso papers, sseep. 20
overwhelming force, aid tho a0vurnH,eilt OF
tho United HtatrA ought never 81 suffer THE .
neaee of Louisiana u bodeIryed u tItelf pos.
session, except ~ pJwef greater than that .
NJ tho United btateH.
Mr.. Hufd defended Ito resolution. aud ar. !
gnsi .hat il'e only question was whether tho
Ilustse 0f Representatives lad power 10 enforce .
The production Of the papers cAilet for ly an i
investigating comnlttGU AMI nav IN tl,o ran. .
lody u tho Louisiana Returning lizard, and .
when thr gOutlsn,an on tho other aida intNr.
which Oongtess could not interfere with, ihoy
nimply beGgsA the whole question. Tho u.,cH.
WON uAs whether Congress led tis power 10
Inquire. II II hnd. u necessarily followed that
\ lied tho right 10 call Tor Tho pr0iu ,ilon of /.
he papsrs incident 70 the inquiry. Tho rscorda
rallsd 1os wcro public records, Hnd must 10
ps0iuced lor the information NJ ihr public. I
ThW membWfs of te Louisiana Igetl,rpinR !
Board did not hold tl,sse iAlrr~ ~ officers.
but ~ individuals. and ~ lndlvldmnis tll0y nsnu
rsspona - elie viii, aa,d produce them before
my tribunal thai lad tho power 10 order their
production. lie Thought that tho aiusi VI .
vessers1ay 0S hfs colleague (NArMtil) 10 tlo
I'laqusu'lne~ fraud Ia INA was ! inoss unfor.
lnhat" one. Ills c0llenene had said thAl tile
Wiik party of That day scau,s~csd ~ aud sub
sver, that that Acqnlesceiee III fraud aud ont.
TAX. wAs mot precedent thst wA1 10 he fol.
lowed BY the neni0cyailu party or by the IN o,Ip
u llls country n this day
Mf. kaxs0n regarded tlo proposition before |
las llo,ro - ususpsllni of power danger.
'spnbllc.
Mr. Coz. Of New York, closed the debate hy
'AyinK that tim NtAta II Louisiana lies pros. !
FAto. hut sha II inst =. necessary now ID M. .
frrAs West y tin great North. u tl.e whole
'oahtIy, as shc ever was, and slu las p.,sui..
iai vuice Ia dsten,iulng Tor this people WHO
shAll bv Our chief executive. Lot IN nul, Mr..
" Aker. Eilow that yoicc " be thtultl,d IN ~
sIlrrl, and let ~ carry uut tle authority of
lnnGfess 10 show lhe leople that thu voscs u
u l.onlsian. he's leon given for liberty. fot
sAmasl !. nldnn.
A vota WA tsksn. And t,N resolution for tl,e
arrest 0f thO insfnhOss Ut tls0 DAHiiniaiS los i
urnlnK bosri aud their production Lefote the
p.r OF tho House, ~ answer far contempt was
sanpt,d by strict party vote--yeas. lbA
ttrsMtAr Proceedings.
MONDAY Jsn ID itHakr, A resolution was
Ias.ea n print as.po casrA eapis~ n shn ssilnon,
laksn ~ tht ttmmisser m Privileges ana flsesinn.
~ ssVAvd ~ the lsle strsttuu III Louisiana. tinvtds
and tenth cATpA, Aifd the casting III tLe electoral
susn NJ. uuuklltg presented sssnssiaHa ~ III.
New fnrh chsn1hfr ri futnulsrse asksnE that
~ sdnpssa fDv ss,hunins nn ibserna-
lAHM hHuney euaaRyufN tn nv thu rslstiss
value " RrlA sud tssr, Referred |
Mr. Jnnas. fssm the st,esIa r.lluiier appointed ia
The inaf Ia