The Princeton union. [volume] (Princeton, Minn.) 1876-1976, 1877-09-28

and the crusty Capt. Bull teri cid, Of
Anoka, graced our c6ult roo IN with
their presence. u. s
September Term Distr{t Court-Tbe
Following are the Disl ositions Made
Of the Several Cases. ] 1s
Dennis E. Kenefeot Tvs BENJAMIN
Soule. Issue Of fact, 90 nti:nued from
last general term; Villa misc & Oyitt
for plaintiff. A. P. Bark Ter, for defend.
ami, Dismissed; plaintiff # failing to ap.
pear. i .5s 1T .l9s 81;
Alexander B. Shute y $ a. P. Barker.
Gilbert Z. Sanford an d Thomas H.
Galley; issue Of law AMID facts; G. d.
Kerr and Lewis D. Delnt for plaintiff
A. P. Barker for defend laInts. Dismiss.
ed without costs.
Galley & Nicely vs. Bebalrd Of County
Commissioners of Mill (e Laos county:
G. D. Kerr for plaintiff IFS, j. "A. Ross
for defendants. By c|onsent Of both
parties, ordered that Judgment be rem
dered and entered in faEyFor of pla intiffs
and against defendants flor $li2 50, 40
costs to be taxed.
Collin Campoell US Jones, Shatto
& Co.; CD. Kerr for plaintiff, N. 4.
Hauser for defendants. Appealed to
the Supreme Court.
y Charles Keith antl B[, B. Cowles vs.
Hayden Brot theirs; issue of fact: ID r.
Searle and A. p Barker for plaintiffs,
Oscar Taylor for defendants. Briefs
to be submitted and c.aIse taken under
| advisement at chambe rs,.
| Joseph Tardy VS. Sonle & Son; Rob
inson & O'Neill for plaintiff, A. P.
Barker for defendants Verdict for
plaintiff in the sum Of $50: new trial
granted by consent Of both parties;
case continued till next general term.
Pratt & Rines vs. A. X. Trask; law
and fact; G. D. Kerr and "A. P. Bark.
er for plaintiffs, for defendant,
Jury trial waived by bothi parties; case
argued in court; Weston liammons. Of
Anoka, appointed referee to take oral
testimony; case to be determined upon
at chambers.
Houston & Co. VS. P. M. Soule;a M.
Q. Butterfeld for plaintiff, "A. P. Bark.
er for defendant: Verdict for plain.
tiffs in the sum Of $85 rs. ~ ..
! I. S. Mudgett vs. HenrySF. Brown:
law and fact; "a. P. Barker for plain.
tiff, Bradley and Morrison for defend.
ant. Settled s5sS go
Samuel Ross vs. Abraham Orr; issue
Of fact; D B. Searle and A, P. Bark
er for plaintiff, G. D. Kerr for defend
| ant. On defendants motion case con
tinued till next general term Of court.
Tidd. Fales 8 West vs. Pratt &
Rines; issue Of law and fact; Woods &
! Merrill for plaintiffs, c. D. Kerr and
| a. T. Barker for defendants. " Trans. |
ferred to United States Circuit Court.
Tidd, Fales g. West vs. C. II. Chad.
bourne; issue Of laws2and fact; Woods
y Merrill for plaintiffs, e. D. Kerr
| A.sP. BarkeTas for defendant, Trans
ferred to 7. 5. Circuit Court. B
| Galley &sNeely rs Board Of County
Commissioner of Mile Laos county:
9. .. Kerr, for plaintjf j. A, Ross for
defendants. By consentsof.s both par
ties, ordered that Judgment be render
ed and entered in faVor Of plaintiffs
and against defend nts, for $ll2 so. |
no costs toibe taxed.
s, 7. Hunt vs. Isaiah Young; appeal
from justice court. on questions Of law
alone, A. P. Barker for plaintiff, j. A.
Ross for defendant. Argued, and
taken under adyisement By the court,
81, Staples as County Treasurer,
in proceedings to enforce the collec.
tionaof personal property taxes, vs. S.
=. Soule, George Smith, B, Soule, H.
j. Twitohell, Owen Bracken and
Murdoc Campbell; j. a. Ross for
plaintiff. Settled. ]. s
George Bockoven rs Hugh Brown;
q. :: Barker for plaintiff, j. "A. Ross
Tor defendant. Appeal from Justice
court. Judgment Of lower court in.
favor Of plaintiff affirmed with costs il
othHcourts added.
Ihe pine land cases in which d. D.
Moore was plaintiff are il about the
same !a condition adj as the other pine land
stse 1ps'ss ...si ..s5ss IS ass
#&f 4ts3