The Republican journal., 1877-10-11
The Opinions of the Rockland Opinion.

NV, ,ne eP'nion ~ ooup' ~ thlilhs IL mas gone So
~ ~ 70. '. ~ a %; ~ uo Oiri} sue
1900 th LI '' n h,t ~ tlu ""s VI us".!n5
Satrn ,,I h;I;,,. sonr, hl - b ", Wy ~
bi1" e'',, aDn, , - ne"Pa On 'c
t A. f;t ;f t1 IN. 1855 III p"si, ii!Snt ~
,t lpIh; ~ D isolin it'''' 1'aPIu "
nnnan has nior mn, h;,SnIf frn u" ii W.
~ ~ .,+ H., ''r,, go :" itauei
or ro,,,iI,, M t L n.y. a.! pt'i'iol'
" tti I o1 h 1i"nt pIIn I"iu,'.r W selNv
have been, they have never sought to weigh down
sr parry II WIN inc pa"Sn OF ,neaF insurgency as
striving to take the reins in their own hands if
wnnIl have hnrn FIJI rs Tnl fo thn sr P'%S ~
over, when we have deemed it proper to crltcisc
speaking as an in dependent Journal. our dissatsfac
l,on eanno! De assembled to disappointment OF per
other, We may be quite as insignificant ii the
u, t tone oi te Journal lPes US TO De
about that-but we cannot be accused Of display
Wbateve nav h 1bnlbt 90 49, IN W.
have said it was at least uttered with sincere de
success Therefore. when the Journal traims s'i ~
batteries on us as beng Presnmptuous upstmts.
and intellectual giants" It shoots Vide Of the
INA tc rs b sls 10 h no. oSurp rs IN e easf ana
as if some Of ours had taken effect on somebody
thnI that tha rcti lt I h W. h are 'Gme 70
ought not to have been else he would not have
the withers Of square Democrats are nnwrnns
nro~ =, r',e sou, "' t mas ANY 70 Say 70 ds
to cloud the Issue by personal surs will not answer
fOpinion ''''E7'''s'
The Belfast Journal is fair euouph to
place in it's columns the language that
it comments upon, which the Opinion
seems to be very much afraid to do That
paper pays to its readers the high com
pliment Of placing their intelligence on Il
par with that Of the Western justice,
who was fully convinced by hearing one
side Of the case, and didn't want to hear
the other. Our Rockland neighbor hurts
us not at all 10y its lnnuendoes concerning
'dlsappolntment OF personal ambitions
and aspirations, Congressional or other,
anu lltlilatlons concerning attempts 70
pecoi'le I" leduef' cue but ne hallilS nun
SUI very 'llueil ny llle use ol lllillelluo'
"lilc" y Selier'Hs weak anu always
'o""iuiS' II tiie e''ilol vi 'ne oplllol
WIN w Soou eiio'Sll ~ "iop 'nlS iililtlllS'
ana state SquafelE WLen 1t was tlat the
conductor OF thls paper experienced dis
appointment OF Congressional aspirations
or leadership III the party, we promise to
copy what he says, i'll his own language,
and make reply. And we hope not to be
50 1ooilshly tallaclous as the opinion.
when 1t states, IN one issue that the lead
ers of the party are incompetent Ola
women, and in another one intimates
that the editor OF this paper eXpe-
riences disappointment in not having
| been recognized as one of them, Obliuue
limiting is bad enough. but when if is
married to such Wretcbed logic. what
prcrency may not he eypected
The 0ninion saws if has ..dermnd if
nroper to criticisp the manaoampnt nt
affairs i'm o,,r n,v,, n,rt,.n If oort,inl,,
has tbot r;abt Nado not sool, +, ol,i,lno
:. ,bo1a,+ p,,+,;+i,;..,,
and hl,o,-,,n..rll,, ,hrso. .,ro+l,o, ,r.. +hc
1ot+or l,o,,, ,1.o,,.nd .l,,,I oo,,+;,,,,
| +l a,,,.; L. ,. ,