National Republican., 1877-09-24
THE COURTS.
THE GENERAL TERM CALENDAR-OSE HUN
DRED ANDTwESrS-SE.NEN CASES IN ALL

TIE pEt EE sfEESPAs9TE Nsr Y # H2N
iiGSs
There were no courts in session Saturday,
except the Criminal Court which was engaged
in the sawyer trial. Business was dull about
the City Hall, and nothing of Importance oc-
Cured.
THE GENERAL TERM.
Hon u. X. Cartier, chief Justice Hon A.. p. olIn,
Hon. Andrew wyl!c, Hon. d G.. Ilumphres and
Hon. Arthur Macarthur, associate Justices viii
open st noon to-day the supreme Court Of the Dis
trict OF Columbia IN General Term. Judge MacAr-
thur will bc present only cOnstructiyely, he Is
holding the Criminal Court
CRIMINAL COURT.
The General. Term Calendar Is as follows Ap-
pcby vs.. Winston Adams vs.. Adams, James Arkell.
Improvement In papcr hagsJ Bartlett VS.. Raymond
Booker vs.. stewart, Bartlett vs. District OF Colum.
ba Bigclow W. Connecticut General Life-Insur-
ance Company, Boucher vs. Boucher Bates vs.
District Of Columbia, Boyle vs. shepherd, bond vs.
pany vs.. GHllahcr Bullantyne vs.. District Of Colum
6ls, Barton vs.: Harbour; Basshor vs.. Kilbourn,
HEX, BerEen vs. Tyler ,r,g higeIow wan,, " shepherd
vs.. Sauderson, Cabin vs.. District OF Columbia
Charter OAK Life Insurance Company VS.. Tamadac,
Cape Ann Granite Company vs.. Blunt, Cluss vs..
District Of Columbia, Creswell ct nj. vs. Maxwell
Dean W. Davis Dixon vs.: wilkins III. Dickson VS..
VS. District of columbia, Dlvoll vs., J0unn. Draner
vs.. Burgess, Dickson vs.; district Of Columbia,
DOWncy VS.. District OF tOlhmblh, Dye vs., Major,
DAVIS VS.. Sreidcn, Dudley vs. Brown, District of
Columbia vs. Lord, Davis VS. Carusi, District of
Columbia ". Gavin, Draper VS.. Hyde, Darby VS..
frecdmans savings and Trust Company, Dunbar,
estate Of Davis d. Duplication for patent) Dow
ling v. Boucher, Eler vs.. rs Berling, Elliot VS..
PS rSnao S Eapage Pggt GGSnT
ton ". zant1inger, Goodyear Denial Vyicante
Cisseii, Hines ". District Of CeIulnLi. MeIsy Va
Mcdonald, Herbert vs. Fields Harmon VS.. Dyer,
lI66 "; ,l', District of v,coi Columbia Hardy vs.
Malone, King vs. Dean Kelly y; Heller,
vs.. Thompson, Lee VS.. Lee, Maxwell vs.. District OF
Columbia. Mcpherson vs. Acker, Morgan vs.. Dis.
!rict Of Colnmbia Meredith ". District of Column
bia Magrudcr vs., Thornton Ncwbcrn yS, Washing
w. @ bane %%G Faye DsB v Bafn.Inc T PSrEsr w. eorss
Richie v. WOlcott, Rider W. Morscil, Rtcuh0Iise
vs.. Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company,
Robinson ys. baltimore aud Potomac Railroad
Company, Randolph vs. Jones; Rand W: Washing
Richard Ns. Mackall, Schneider vs.. District OF
southey v Hume. stantan, receiver, vs.. Mcknight
sailor rS. Mitchell, SChlorb vs.. tlnrk, strausc vs.
", lark Thomas VI. Pollok, Truuk W. Baltimore
and Potomac Railroad Company Tyler V. nuscy
temple vs. kNsily l. ImiiSd state' vs. Lam"m, United
Secretary of the Navy United Slntcs vs.. Wccden,
nitcd State, vs.. slant, Wood ys, Wood, Walker vs.
Potomac Ferry company, Washington and uourge'
town Railroad company vs. District of columbia
Wright vs.. WEIGH, Williams ys. Tucker, WclCh vs.
Dis,~ Of Columbia, Wallach vs. Burchc Young
vs. Strong Zimmerman vs.. Kimmcll, Zimmerman
estate of Zimmerman W. Maitingy one hundred
and twenty seven eases In all. The court will
probably continue in session lye weeks.
Tho only criminal cases before the court on
appeal are those OF Lemusl WCCden, convicted Of
assault and battery with intent TO kill ChpTl0s
Goodman, sentenced to Ave years In the penlien.
tary aud Nm stAnt, convicted Of IGanslaughIor