The New York herald., 1877-09-07
vICIssITUDEs OF MARRIED LIFE.


having relation to the marital relations, came up
lerday before Judge Curtis in the Superior Court.
From the papers in the presented by Mr.. Morgan
]. O'Bren counsel for the plaintiff it appears that
barbara Schreyer and Philip Schreyer were married in
this city in 1885, that IN 1850 lot was purchased by
them tor $4,000, and tho deed taken in tho names OF
Mrs. Scbreyer (plaintn) and The husband Jointly,
although the money paid Mrs Schreyers solely;
aiterward house built the lot; that alter
two three years Philip Schreyer commenced q
series Of petty insults against his wiie which
rlpened into actual maltreatment, and that
Mrs schreyer compelled to apply for
limited divorce from her husband, which she
obtained in 1873 The Court in awarding the separa-
directed Philip Schreyer the husband pay to
his wife 81 so per week amony for the support Of her
self and children. As happens In large majority Of
such the husband failed to the alimony and
nasmuch he receiving the rents OF the property
bought by Mrs. schreyer application was made to tho
Court rents sequesLerod. In avoid
this step through his lawyer agreed that he
would execute mortgage on the property to Mrs.
Schreyer 500 for years, and in order carry
the arrangement out q deed was DO made by
schreyer ana his wife to mutual friend named
Andrew Dettinger, Tor nominal consideration, who
was TO execute to Mrs Schreyer the mortgage agreed
upon which thereafter done. scureyer died
Ia 1876, and up 10 the time OF his death continued
10 collect the rents OF the property. In 1872,
from Germany and became an inmate IN the house
which Mrs. Schreyer had left, shortly aiterwurd
commenced lvn. with Mr. Schreyer Us his wife, and
continued such relation the time oil Schreyer's
DEATH In 1876. Alter Schreyer's death Miss Brod6
presented paper purporting 10 be the will OF Philip
Schreyer, bequeathing 10 Miss Brode all his real
tate, well as The properly held by Detnger and
which Miss Brode now claims TO own. Mrs. Scnrcyer
further found that tue mutual friend DeIlnger had
conveyed tho property TO Casslmer Schreyer, a
brother Of her deceased husband, who in turn
conveyed the properly to Christine Brode. Mis-
Schreyer brings this suit to set aside these convey
ances, The ground that they are fraud her
rights nasmuch her money purchased the properly
built house. and tnat when she signed the
veyance Detinger on the understanding that
title should pass, but that It was done SIMPLY 70
secure the aimony awarded her by having mortgage
executed TO her by Dettnger On the part OF the
fendants It contendsd Dy Mr. HARRISON OF counsel,
that The plaintiff, IN consideration OF the delivery OF
the mortgage her. agreed 10 release all hcr rgnt,
ttlc and the premises, and that the subsc
quent conveyances TO MISS Brod6 and Cassimer
Scbreycr at request OF the deceased husband
On these facts the painl moved for receiver of the
property, pending the action, aad tue Court took The
papers, reserving It's uccision.
THE HARSILACHE DIVORCE SUIT.
Tho story OF Mary T. Harsiacne, who claims TO be
the wife OF LOUIS c. Harsilache, which already been
FULLY published in the HERALD, was rected Al length
yesterday, before Judge westbrook In Supreme Court
Chambers, on u renewal Of the motion claiming all
mony pending her ior limited divorce II Will DO
remembered thai the parties met q steamer
coming from Europe. she then representing
her name be Miss Gurnscy, coming TO this country
70 fual an operate engagement with Max Strakoscn
that this acquaintance was renewed at u boarding
house and that aiterward they lived together hus-
banu wife, he claiming that their relations were
mcrctrcious and she that compact oil marriage was
eutercd into between them. She charges hiu with
dcsertng her and thcir two children. After hearing
the statement OF facts both sides Judge wcstbrook
gave an vruer allowing her $40 weekly aiiinony and
directing the be tried Tho October term Of
tho Court