The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1877-09-22
True copy-Test-
w. Ii. TOWER, Clerk.
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
VIM. c. BORDLY VS.. ERNEST w. CECIL
and MARY +. NASH.
In the Circuit Court for Garrett county, sit.
ting as q Count OF EumitN. No o.

In the Circuit Court for Garrett county, sit
ting as Court of Equity. No. 81.
THE OBJECT OF THIS SUIT IS TO
L procure a decree setting aside the deeds
of Ernest W. Cecil to Mary f. Nash, bearing
dates 2lSt. day of October 1876 and the 18th
day of October 1876, conveying Military Lots
westward of Fort Cumberland No 3Z79 for five
hundred dollors and Nos. 4II9, 1891, 4lIO 4l4l,
H. $50 3d. So 1850 II50, l5O $50, 8l26, l65 1871
l70, lil3, 1000, 20i0. 3067, 405 1885, 1910 49, l4O6
l2il, l2H, and 1867, for four thousand seven
hundred and fifty-five dollars. and which will
more fully appear by reference to Liber w.
ii, I. No. folio l2l Il l2i, LSc one of the Land
Records for Garrett county, and which are sit
uated in Garrett county, Maryland.
The bill states that on or about the Eth
day of February, 1876, VIM. c. Bordley
obtained Judgement against Ernest W.
Cecil in the baltimore City Court for
the sum of S3O4.S2 with $24.75 costs,
refused to pay said judgement or any part
thereof, and being unable to make the same
in baltimore city. he took proper legal steps
TO have an execution issued and directed to
the Sheriff of Garrett county, and that after
said execution was issued and directed to j.
G. Durham, Sheriff of said county, the said
sheriff seized and levied upon the aforesaid
real estate and advertised the same to be sold
on ;he 2lSt day of March, 1877, and that the
day before said sale the said Ernest w. Cecil
ttcd for record in the Circuit Court for Gar
rett county, the aforesaid fraudulent and pre-
tended deeds embracing all of said property
so advertised, to his Sister-in-law Mary +.
Nash, for the pretended sums hereinbefOre
named. And that the said Cecil is in
solvent, and he cannot make said
money unless the the said fraudulent
cOnVeyanceS are set aside and that said
cOnveyanceS were fraudulent and not for
II valuable bonafide consideration and
were made to hinder and delay his creditors.
And that they were not made or ack nowledg-
Ell at the time they purport to be, but were
fraudulently changed and altered. And that
the SherlH of Garrett county on the Dist day
OF March 1871 in accordance with his adver-
tiScment offered said Lots for sale and did sell
the same to VIM. C. 5ordly for S5O.00 as his re-
turn Will show, and that the said fraudulent
conveyances are a cloud upon his title and
prayS for the vacating and annulling said
fraudulent deeds. And that the said Ernest
W. Cecil and Mary f. Nash reside out of the
state of Maryland.
1t is thereupon adjudged and ordered that
the Complainant, by causing copy of this
order to be inserted in some newspaper pub
lished at Oakland, Garrett county, Md, once
in each of four successive weeks before the
LIST day of October 1877, give notice to the said
absent defendants ofthe object and substance
of this bill, and warn them to appear in his
court in person, or by solicitor on or before
the third day of January 1878, to answer the
why decree ought not to pass as prayed.
VIII. TOWER,
Clerk of the Circuit Court for Garrett County
sitting as Court of Equity.
True Copy-Test:
w. II. TOWER, Clerk. sl-t4