Omaha daily bee., 1877-11-14
ADDITIONAL LOCAL
United a { COu

ADDITIONAL LOCAL
United states Cou
: The following business has bee!
. transacted III the United States Cir
cult Court, Judges Dillon and Dund,
presiding:
!, Earle vs. Bratt ct al !; settlsd b.
stipulation.
Craven vs. U p r r Co ; deposi
ton Of p~lsintiff suppressed and cas-
continued.
Bemis vs. Dox ct al demurrer t.
petition sustained.
Latts VS. Hanover Fire Insurance
Company; leave to file amended
petition and continued.
First National Bank Of Omaha VI
Sievers ct al; motion Of defendant
Crosby to dissolve attachment de-
MED.
Chamberlain ct al VS. Horn ct al
leave to answer by this morning.
Boswell vs. Williams ct al; settled
as per stipulation.
Shugart va Neigh ct 81; demurrer
to petition submitted.
United States va Zoe ct al; defen-
dant to answer in fifty days and con-
tinued.
Gregg, administrator, vs. U P r r
company; defendant to answer by
next Thursday.
parey etai vs. Baker; defendant to
answer in twenty days.
United States vs Mcclure, admin
I~strator; order pro confesso.
Lefeyer VS. Gish, ct al; decree for
complainant.
Stoutz VS. FInlay ct II; time for
taking proof extended 100 days.
Smith vs. Wayne county Ut al; in.
Junction continued IN force for one
week.
Gertensberg ct al VS. Bromer; de.
cree pro confesso and reference to
Marter.
Bartholomew, assignee Of Brown
ys Morgan, etc; Master ordered to
close taking account by Dec 18th.
Bartholomew, assignee, etc., VS.
Blake; same order as last case.
Daily, U Marshal, vs Morgan, ct
al; same order as last case.
The following cases were contin-
ued:
d NJ River r K Co, VS. o P R X
Co.
Trimble ct al, vs. U r r Co.
q r r Go vs Cool.
UPR R Co vs Hnman.
Mccormick VS. McCammon.
Stoat VS. s G & P r r Co.
Hegler VS. Faulkner, ct al.
3 P r r Co vs Buffalo, Kearney,
Saline. Merrick, Adams, Hamilton,
Hall, York, Platte, Douglas, Wash.
ington, Cunning, Sarpy, Colfax,
Saunders and Butler counties.
Bartholomew, assignee, vs. Kop-
plekam.
wyoming Coal & Mining Co, vs
Wardell.
United States VS. Lounsbury, ct al.
Brown VS. Sherman county.
Jeffray ct al VS. Vsllery, Jr, ct al.
First National Bank of Omaha VS.
Loveland.
U S vs. Mccain ct al.
Fucht, administrative, VS. U PkR
Company.
n E Barnard, Of st Joseph, Mo,
and r s Maloney, of Humboldt,
Neb, were admitted to practice.
Low VS. Schoenheit, ct al; motion
to strike reply from files over-ruled
and rule entered into taking proofs.
Craig VS. Pollock; demurrer with.
drawn, leave to answer on the 10Th
inst.
Craig VS. Cones; demurrer with
drawn, leave to answer on the 10Th
inst.
Craig vs. Campbell !; demurrer
withdrawn, leave TO answer OF the
18th inst.
Tulleys trustee VS. Cogswell ; de-
fault confirmed and reference to
master to state account.
Blair vs. West Point Manufactur.
ing Go proofs to be closed in 40
DAYS and then submitted on briefs.
Davis vs. Carter !; order proconfes-
so and reference to master.
Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
vs Tfsdell ct al (; order
proconfesso and reference to master.
Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
VS. Dice; ct al Order pro-
confesso and reference to master.
Rogers vs. Nellght; ct 81; sale con-
firmed and deeds ordered.
Miller VS. Sullivan; judgment for
Miller vs Cronan; judgment for
defendant.
Miller VS. Hursley; continued.
ChOnteau Insurance Company vs
continued.
Chonteau Insurance Co VS. Rustin;
continued.
Balcomb vs. Wash ct al ; motion
Tor a new trial argued and submit
ted.
Johnson vs. Jacobson ct al CON-
AuItman & Taylor Go vs. Bliss
continued.
Davis vs. Perkins ct al ; leave to
reply this morning.
Hoil vs. Scott; jury trial pending.