The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1877-11-16
GRAND JURY.

lIC JULIUS lOl tuC lCTlD
GRAND JURY.
William B. Baker, Foreman.
VIM, Reasin, of Frank John w. Paca,
Thomas Hanway, John W Hauby,
John II. Smith, VIM. G. Carroll,
Israel A. Scarf, Henry Breuninger,
John Miller, Daniel Turnbull,
VIM. t. Sutton, Samuel M. Ady,
Edward Colgan, Samuel Hapway,
James 5. Barrow, VIM. G. Booth,
Chas. E. Hitchcock, JAS II. Swarlz,
Benz. l.. Mason, Aug. Wattenscheidt,
Jas. W. GLADDEN., Daniel Kenly.
PETIT JURY.
Roger STREET.. E. II. d. Pue,
Frank Whitaker, Luther Osborn,
Geo. w. Forwood, John Adams,
Cfas Leltler, A. j. Treadwell,
Charles Hall, Chas Walters,
X. j. Rogers, N. B. Holland,
Jesse Price, Geo. w. Chalk,
J. Wilson Galbreath, Arch. Wilson,
f. Hopkins, of Lee, Thomas Gross,
}. A. Cunningham, Geo. ii. Zimmerman,
John w. Scarboro, Geo. Harvard,
Martin T. Murphy, John X. Heaps.
Daniel F. Shure, Jr.
At the call of the docket, judgments were
entered in the following cases
Thomas E. Flaharty vs. Andrew ]. Bar
toms admir-; judgment in favor of plaintiff
for costs. Stump and Young for plaintiff
| Williams, w. G. Scott and Stevenson Archer
| for defendants.
Laura Flaharty vs. same; same entries.
Reyburn, Hunter q Co. VS.. jesse Burbank;
judgment on terms filed. Williams for plain
| titfs, Webster for defendant
Alnutt d johnson vs. Clement Dietrich
judgment confessed Farnands for plain
tifis, III. w. Archer for defendant
Jesse E. Cullum VS.. James M. Keithley
judgment of non pros. by consent. Young
and Stump for plaintiff, W G. Scott and Gil
bert for defendant.
William W. Friedman vs. Henry L. Tay.
lor; referred to VIM. r. Clark and w. s.
Bowman. Stump for plaintiff, Farnands
and Young for defendant
Charles w. Proctor VS.. Osborn & Carroll;
satisfied. Stevenson Archer for plaintiff
Robert j. Scott VS. j. Thos. Gorrell ;judg-
ment by default. Archer & VanBbber for
plaintiff.
Marshall Bros. vs. Hugh c. Whiteford
judgment by default. Maynadier for plain
tiffs,
Gabriel A. McComas VS.. shadrach and John
f. STREET.; judgment on terms to be filed
Archer & VanBibber for plaintiff, Williams
for defendants.
VIM. b Morgan's admir- vs. Amos Osborn;
Judgment confessed. Hopkins for plaintiff,
Stump for defendant.
VIM. b. Morgan's admir- VS. w. P. c.
Whitaker, trustee; judgment confessed.
Hopkins for plaintiff, Farnandis and VIM G.
Scott for defendant
II. w. Archer VS.. VIM. M. Elliott iuGg.
ment confessed. Lee for plaintiff, Stump and
Young for defendant
Ohio S. Lee vs.. Henry c. Hall; Judgment
confessed Lee for plaintiff, Archer s. Van.
Bibber for defendant.
VIM B. Morgan's admir- vs. Parker Gil.
bert; Judgment confessed. Hopkins for
plaintiff, Gilbert for defendant.
VIM G. Bakers executor VS.. George W.
Chalk and others; judgment by default
Hopkins for plaintiff.
Samuel Maccubbin's admir- VS.. Geo. A.
Heuisler ; judgment confessed. Hopkins
for plaintiff, Archer s. VanBbber for defend
ant.
VIM. III. Ewing VS.. Sebastian Kurtz ;iudg-
ment Stump for plaintiff, Young for de.
PENDANT.
Peter o. Herman VS.. VIM T. Cronin re-
fcrred to Patrick Howard and John M. Hop.
kins. Young and Stump for plaintiff, Web.
ster for defendant.
Jeremiah Lowe vs.. John r. King and wife;
Judgment on terms filed. Williams for plain
tiff, Stump for defendants.
A. II. Stump 81 Sons VS.. Alonzo and Ann
McNulty; judgment. Stump for plaintiff,
hopkins for defendant
VIM. G, BARRIERS executor VS.. Jacob Hess
and Jas: II. Preston; judgment, Hopkins for
plaintiff, Williams for defendants
Amanda z. Howard vs. Jacob II. and Hen
ry Hess; judgment Williams for plaintiff,
Hopkins for defendants.
III. W. Archer and Herman Stump VS..
Robert b. and VIM. p. Taylor judgment on
terms filed. Stump for plaintiffs, Young for
defendants
A. F. Brown VS.. Amos Osborn and wife;
Judgment confessed. Stump for plaintiff,
Young for defendants
A. II. Stump & Sons VS. Alonzo McNulty
two cases; off Stump for plaintiffs.
The following cases were transferred to
the stet docket:
G. II. Elliott Sc Co., vs. ]. M. Simmons
and others; Samuel Halbert VS.. Thomas Bill
lingslea; Sylverter Phelps VS.. Joseph Arthur;
F. B. Hanson & Co. vs. Waterman, garnishee
ofJoseph Arthur; John Clayman VS.. George
Cook