National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1877-01-16
THn CouRTs.
suprsm. Cour. Of u. United States.

| No. lag Milton Humeg, assignee, &C., sppel-
| the District Court Of the United States for the
| Northern district Of Alabama Mr.. Jsstice
ss me sps 81 the W
| costs, and remandine the same with directions to
enter decree for the complainant, in conformity
| with ahe opuion Of his court. - -
No. 81. The Lake Superior and Mississippi
Railroad Company, appellant vs.. The United
No. s7s The A tchison. Topeka and santa re
| Railroad ijompanvl aupellapt- va the United
States, Appeals from the Court Of GLAZING Mr..
Of Claims and FemandinT the esuses With direc.
lions to enter judgments In favor Of the claimants
scntingNJustices MiiIer. Clifford. sWsyne and
Davis -
i Steamshp -Idano Sc xppcai fFom, the Circuit
| Court OF the United States for the Easterp dis
trict Of New York MI, Justice Strong delivered
he sia r 81 S rnss Win soss Oh
poSss Ns a Hsss hs ~. our
Of fke ITnfed STATE a m the Norfiern distrint of
I New York. M. Jnsticc Held deify efed the opin-
GirenIt Cont IN this canse WitS coSis ", INV 'AN
4 No. oyI Heyman Dsterberr as,peIlant. VS. The
Union Trust COMPANY q Ne1 York ct a. APP
States fSr the Nortbsrn distriet Of Illinois me-
Justice Davis delivered the opinion Of the court,
/ this cause with costs $500 - :.
No. sol. Socrates HuT. plaintiff in error. VS.. O.
w Doyle ct al. In error to the Supreme COURT
Tyered The oninion' of the conrt. reyersing the
| Judgment Of the said Supreme Court, with costs,
affirm the judemens Of tho District court Of tho
| Third judicial District, county Of Alameda. Mr..
cause. Cause ''' '0'A ny SAf' ~ 'Ns ''''s''A y 'A''
No. ISL VIM. R. utley ct al, plaintiffs in error,
vs. John W. Donaldson ct al. In error to the Or.
district Of Michigan. Mr. Justice Swayne deiiv-
cred the opinion of the court. reversing the judg-
ment q the said Circuit court, with costs. and
,ae cause with ia, sssn. snser
Mr.. Justice Srcag. Mr.. 1ustice Clifford and Mr.:
the decision crths cause. '' A'' ''0A H0 pAi' ~
nost fG.er nnsai Inc sr Snea I'M
Doal Jonn L haseroucs, &C. appear IRON the
en- district q New SoEk; III; Justice SIIdeSd
de ar .ae opinisSan q, Ine court arm I'M tne
VIII eos ~ inc sAia oeui' oouft LII 'his cause
Nc; ISL; TIE United states; plaintiffs IN eIror
of AnneaIs If the State 81 NaryIana M fGhiaS
waite delivered the opinion Of the court
snt Hr r sss MI. error IN this cause ior the
No y fnrigsnaiS r. nr,,. Roht T c,,t;n,
the eonrt DENYING tbe ee,tton r me =,
This canses 'As 'ie fes.s.oA i0t "1""1s III
u. No e iis. The Atlantic and Pacific Railroad
In error 70 he 1Ircnt f,ons of the irn;,ed gtsta
for the Histrict or ksDsss ME- Sbies fnsties
IVA a a, tne o. the curt arm-
mt, anu o,,n m % Inc OIL tne said Cr-
w No Sy ISI Wm rniS ~ RoTd a, Al r,.,,.trs
,-s I.in NJ No.. ~. I G,s al, m M IN eIIoa,
ttnnrt ~ ~. Ssstn 81 Tannasoa " ing
lice WAITE desiNered the onSnton If tns ccnrs
Gar1 ~ sne Juus =, ING saiu supreme
MI ~ ti, 1,oa hhi. ~ wsss,
c,aimant annns,,ont ~ Tna ffs,.sd Ssa,.s
Ia AN, . .. "
{ claimant, appellant, vs. The United States; APP
peais HS4 iis ~ ss,s Ssy ~
IOI tuC GisteIu Olss. va ANSeFs hAks SASt Jus
~ tS " ate esnscleu tnS opi9ion ol the oosi1
these eas1ses NNSs1'es u Inv saiu one1I Soui' AZ
No. ~. Mary A. Pearson ct al, plaintiffs In
error, vs.. John and Anne Jane YewdalL. ME-.
court, denying the motion to dismiss the writ Of
error in this cause. .-.5-r. ! .s,s..sI
ward simon appsisn% sIs. Ed
nounced the decision of the court granting the
motion TO vacate order In this case 80
NO: S54; Emil Hornor, plaintiff In error, vs..
Scates In behalf OIL counsel dismissed with costs,
per sslpulatIol.
J. Garcia. This cause was submitted on printed
smith, Of counsel for appellants, and BY Mr.; Ed
Maru Janin, ioi inc aPpenee, uhder tne tWentietn
rule. , .ai l.
40. w: line I2Wnsnlp o. East Oakland, plain
TN N error. VI. WIN; =. Skinner. This cause was
submitted on printed arguments BY Mr.. John NJ:
EalMer; Oh coensei ior me Piantiu IN error, ana
" Ml. n ~ =; SIeene' MI: ~. hitter ana Mr.
upder the twentieth rule.
Fnocb ~ Yen,,cr 81 ~ ct al, appeiiAnts, vs..
Hn no ~ Y d. a. ruler ct all appellants VS..
Ep No 1s p; tenI v ELL e. A. ,.,,.
er%a au t,"carteh rs. ~, mppeiiaf9.s W.,
causes was S 90, continued 6y MI. w. b. Scates, Of
AdIourned until today at IL O'Clock.
,.'. - v
eh'ei S Snsec Ssrsr ana nr sndg b h on; HUM
SUPPLYING The ANEs suNs-A COUNSELLOR SEEK
N1sHEp CONTRACTOR. 800 =
oryaV and Raifimore and ,ihio Rsl,,oaS a Ss.
nsnyS nSstrsct Of f,o,nmh,o the S,htey Instice
Stated that the Judges would consult and assign |
Jntbe matte ~ tbe esta3s aF Horat,o Ames
deceased. An appeai by Char,otis Il Imas al
prob,te ina5ss c decree o. the special tern q
Village I,onnectSnt aS.en t AWSs, Vi 5aus
against the ,nifcd nYssrn asIge sm
rIoughtiron cannon and ordnance furnished by /
nm, Mnien, iol numDef Oh year., ne naa unsac-
towards the close Of the year 1898 obtained the |
@ .. tne aae III , ~ ~ Sd an ssso.
& h.. and az Az tns e 81 ms aea eat mem
ter or mom nor 81 agreement 81 date FEB.
tuary 70, Ieos. iofmaIy Ietsihed MI. Afrek as
q sash claim before Congress, the E1seutiTs p.
P arsn t or tps Oe9ri u o1tms iod mne d ne
ssLeeu " ~ ~. 1870 ..pStal ioe ehu Iis
Juss anu ~ sL ~ soIa ~ ny
GhtsS mas ~ sne iooeIH NJ "a Wy PrvseSes oi NJ
e eh, h NJ Seeuihg III. AIlcA seIsices, anu
ns is ~ shsIs mefs tssofered i,on she
government ior MI Amee, ana, AFTER ms oeath,
Tor ms estate, the following sums On the dates
mentioneu, VIZ Maacn y io'u sS,sVovi July -,
is'u, stz,vSeo; april ~, 1911, SzS.oJo; Decempef
-, iSdI; rsyvVs, Jahnsff q tsfa 1902; makan8
totai Oh Sieo, seS.oo. VI .mis smount tnefe was
attorney, to Oliver 1 %es Is sdminisratof
Oh hoTatio Ames, $3.50;
IN January, lsii, nofau0 Ames dled, leaving
VIII, Hhica mas peen Guy aomitted 70 probate
anu IecoIc, WneIeuy ne pe9ueathed MS estate to L
ms VIE, tne sara CnarIotte La Ames.
IN Ine SIN Gay o. august, lsl1, Mrs. Charlotte
Ia Ames me widow. an. Mr.. Hnziett were /
granted letters ot administration, c. g. o., on the
estate Of nofatio Ames by this court, holding L
special term, probate jurisdiction, which appoint
ment Oliver Ames, the brother Of the deceased, /
attempted to revoke and succeeded in obtaining
a decree in his favor at the special term which, |
however,.w reversed, after protracted argu-
ment, by this court sitting in general term, and
the original grant to the widow and Mr.. Hazlett /
va confirmed.
Hazlett having died before settlement Of the /
estate, Mrs. Ames nled her account as admins
tratrix in due form in this court, In June, 1878,
wherein she charged herself with the amounts /
paid to her by the United States on account Of /
the guns and ordnance furnished by her husband