The New York herald., 1877-10-17
DECISIONS.
sUpREME coURT-cHAMBERs.
BY Judge Donohue.

BY Judge D0nOhue.
Blake VS.. Blake; BoYsrdus w. Barton Banks vs..
Earle: Erbsnenl VS.. Erbsnehi; Exempt Firemen y
Benevolent Fund vs.. Ragnsr; Dunning vs.. Hamilton
Deshon vs. Dsshon and others; Gcdh.ra % W. Blake
Graaf vs.. Schwarz; Green VS.. Rowland; jackson vs.
Kitchen; In .Ls matter of Kobsch; IN .he matter Of
Thcrassen In the matter OF Swarez; IN the matter Of
stuart; In the matter OF Lund; the matter oil Dun
Swarez; wetmore vs. Tonneile; White VS. Yost
Wood vs. McJabo; Union Dime Savings Institution VS..
Rowe; Hcmmonway Va Schmale; matter Of Thomp-
kins simpson VS.. Bank OF New brunswick; Linlm
VS.. Monroe; Kenznian VS.. BehriDg; frmDle @ys
Lie Roy; Sheridan Va. Kitchen; Sheridan vs.. Kitchen
Grcen VS.. Rowland; Ogle vs.. Lembardo; Bonay
vs. Cary; Heath vs. Holder; Eleventh Ward Bank vs..
West tNo. p; Kelly VS.. Austin; Marshall vs.. Bates;
Horz vs.. Gcrhartz; Grossly vs. Blair; Amcs Plough
Company vs.. Smelling; ThurDer vs.. Pyatt; Agra
monte vs. Mason; Blunt VS.. Comstock; hastorton vs.
pSnnas ' vs. EasSrs ys Ere M
mons; Fucurer W. Missner; Pierce W.. Waters Keller
vs. Porter Merrill vs. Ca cagno Ingersoll Rock Drill
Ryan vs. Baldwin; Mayer VS.. Mayer; Lacnenmcyer
". Lachenmeyer; Aherns VS.. Heennye; National
land vs. Bradstrcet; Kulbman VS.. Anuiann; Gore vs..
Manning; Charles VI. Keitningcr; Winn vs. Clark;
Wine VS.. Dmo savings Bank; Bixoy VS.. schowlsr ct
al-Granted.
Corteyou vs. Muiock Motion denied.
Chubo vs. Eousn; sprasue vs.. Alcott -Memoran-
Cochran w. Now York Fire Escape Company
Granted Memorandum.
Denny vs. Lester; Walker VS.. Baecock; Nathan vs.
Schafer Motion denied memorandum.
N'choi vs.. Gurnsey.-Must be proof OF responsibility
oil guardian.
kolte VS. Tnsbne aud Others --Granted; men lioned.
Sohn " Reitnger.-Grantcd on pay me nj oil costs
People, &c, VS.. New York juvenile Guardian 90
cioty. .-Dened, without COSTS
Pecham vs. Weeks lSo. ~; Same w. Same (No. ~;
Same vs.. Same tNo. $3.50 allowance.
Hail vs. Morton.--Motion granted
Yerks vs. Weeks. s.-Setticd.
In the Matter oil Wesa.-Mako proof OF responsible
ity oil guardian aud one viii lie made.
COMMON PLEAs-spECIAL TERM
BY Judge Robinson.
Grosz and another va DAILY and another.-Ordcr to
continue mechanics lien granted.
Philips Phillips.-Moton denied, with $40 COSTS
but without prejudice TO renewal payment Of costs
OF default
Gourand vs. TrusL--Motion denied, with $40 costs,
10 abide tho event.
la lhe matter vi peck.-Separate order In each case
Gulot vs. GuilloL--MotIon for temporary aimony
bey ond that tho defendant has beon and
counsel Ice denied
The People, NC, vs. Kelly.-Mot,on for mandam IS
dcntcd, WITH sic costs.
Loomis VS.. Now York Warehouse and Security CON-
pany.-Motlon tc continue injunction order den lci
and order OF injunction yacaica, with $40 costs.
opinion
Morse VS.. walker-Motion TO amond denied. with
S10 costs See memorandum.
Goodwin VS.. Chamberlain See memorandum.
In the matter OF HHrdy-Rccevdr appointed,
shannon Everett t-Givu notice oil motion.
Saimon VS.. Morai and another.-Moton grauted
Jessup W. Crazy Application granted.
Lyons vs. CurtIn-kcerence ordered
Callahan W. Rodtkc.Juognicnt Tor plaintiff for de-
livery Of property, with costs
Haraux vs.. sadler.-Anidavit not sufficient See