The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-11-06
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBERS.
Ry Ind n DonOhue

"a
Hcpze W. Hence; Scligman va Loft; Eastman
Wheeler; In the matter OF Ray; Wcyerhauser vs..
Dun; Dunn vs. Munroc; Donneiy va MoCahili; smith
vs. smith; Fairchild vs. Gonzalez; Tho People VS..
American Popular Life Insurance Company In the
matter Of Shuts; IN The matter Of harris; Dyckman
Bcekman Fire insurance pany.-Grantcd
Hyatt vs. HyasL-Decrec OF divorce granted to plain
Randall w. Knobiauck.-ln the case think tho So
curty should be $3.50, but tho order must only be 10
stay, not to dismiss
granted unless the plaintiff stipulae TO credit the
Judgment the amount OF the excess On fling stpu-
iaton 10 do 50 ana not enforce the Judgment beyond
me amount really due the motion will be denied.
smith Young; Vaughan vs. Haycs.-Moton do
med.
Isaacs VS.. Hackes.-Atter full consideration think
tho order must stand as IL 49,
Southwick vs. SouthwiCk; Stono vs.. Stonc.-Dccreo
OF divorce granted TO painful
KingsIand vs. Tho Mayor, &c; Andrews va. Now
Jersey Steamboat Company.-Grantcd; memoran-
Weiners VS.. wcncrs. without costs.
Cardwcl VS.. Byrnc.-Moton granted. J. J. Neais
Isaacs VS.. Roscu feId.-Motion granted.
Maccaoc VS.. Chrystal; Lcndrum VS. Aidcn.-Mo-
tion denied, without costs
Randle VI. Won Ebert. Chrystal VS. Allard; Will
kcns VS. Crawford Memorandum
uauscr vs. Carroll -Urdcr settled.
People ex rel Mccarthy Committee, sc, OF
State Convention -Altcrnative writ granted opin-
in tho matter Of rccervcrship OF Clairmont Savings
Bank-Molon granted as TO nrst prayer; denied 10
second
WITTY VS.. Wltty.-Party who made tho servce must
be examined.
Lowcnstcln vs. Roberts--Thc order is modified by
ADDING the WORD inserted.
Wetsmore vs. Hesoman.-aotion granted. Memo
randum.
stockwcll Va webstcr-I ihis case think the do
fcndanis have the papers cnlrcly denied plaintiffs
equities, especially as TO Indebtedness, IN which tho
stock is collateral. There rs nothing, ALSO, 10 show
Inc least suppose TINT tho defendants
one. viii not be paid. Motion donicd.
The Brandun Manufacturing Company vs.. Pctton-
gil-Thc right oil the paintin 10 tho order given by
The code IS general and not restricted to any partcu
lar action. ! do not think the Court has tho night 10
restrict II that lies with The Legislature Thc lucs-
ton MS 10 wnat the defendant must answer viii arise
when no Is asked any question TO which he objects.
As To the aniiavps prior use, do not see how IL rs
before the Court Examination TO proceed.
SUPREME coUET-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Donohue.
Waters and othnrs Conway and otnera-Judg-
mcnt Tor defendant on demurrer.
SUPERIOR CoUgr--GENERAL TERN.
BY Judges Scdgwick, Spcir and Freedman
Tho Ncwcaslie Chemical Works Company vs. Reed
ct aL --DefrndaBts exceptions overruicd AMI Juig-
mon, for plx,nliI on verdict No opinion.
AIgic vs.. acknowledgement reversed and new trial
granted, with costs 10 appellant 10 ABIDE inc event
Op,uion by Jul ge Scdgwicx.
BY Judges 5pcir and Freedman.
New York Guaranty and Indemnify Company VS.
Roberts --Oracr Affirmed with costs.
Adams va Welsh OF al.--Ordcr reversed, with costs.
iy Judges Scdgwick aud Freedman.
Garfield others VS. The Baltimore and Ohio
Railroad Company. --Iud smont and orjcr affirmed,
with cogts. No OPINION.
by Judges scdgwick and Spoir.
Ludington vs. Bali.-Duicndant's exceptions over
ruled judgment ordered for plaintiff on VERDICT with
costs.
BY Judges Sedgwick and Sanford.
Dctz vs. Fariah--Appcal dismissed, with costs.
Opinion by Judge sanford.
In the matter OF The petition OF Hatch-Order ap-
pcacd from affirmed Opinion by Judge SANFORD.
y Chief Justice Gurus Judges sanford and Freed
Harris and another |urdatt and another
judgment reversed ana new trial ordered with cUsts
TO abide event. opinion " jugs SANFORD.
SUPERIOR CoUET-spEcIAL TERM.
BY chief Justice Curtiy.
American Medicine Company vs. Kcsser.-Ca6c and
exceptions orderci on lite.
BY Judge freedman.
Berry ut nj. vs.. Gould; 6oldng vs.. McGoughry OF
al Peters w. HARRISON ct n.--Ordcrs settled
by Judge Spelr
Grosbeck Vs. WATERPROOF, solomon VS.. Hcrst -Ofdcr
granted and undertaking approved
Bonneville othcrs VI. inl -I.clcrcncc ordered.
Schwafzolt va Mclsrdc, --Urdorcd gu special Caicn-
dar Tor 3Uth OF November
Po,IIon VS.. Lawrence ct aL--0rder staying pro-
Coedings on judgment
williamson va Aantis ctAL-order for publication.