Brenham weekly banner. [volume] (Brenham, Tex.) 1877-1907, 1877-04-20

| the kitcnenl
was NO more
The night
WIS raining pre-
told me- that moSN
my son could NOT 70
| replied that one ID
and that would
sash. | worked until
after dinner. When
SASH up stairs my wife
tic 10 cut out some sid
and when came into til
cutting out this shirts %
which had been tx
which was covered
from the sash.
quiet manner that
waitrc until coul'
else cleaned it he
swenelik." and
thiee tables IN
tins one sac thrs
practice OF calling
d-rer " thief" s.
She then cstIiie fow;t
out OF her WHY and
loom, and locked the d.
through the window and caiiS
who was thea iu the stable, he
waking very slowly ana | called
aga.n to hurry up. that his mother
gong to whip me. Size soon
mem ed hamniering On tile doc
continued dung so until slie SD
She found out that she could not q
there, aud she Wei out on the galls
and hammered against the blinds al1
broke one OF them. tShe once stated
uader oath that she broke the blind
with her FIST and the door with her
slor.) When opened the door She
was in the other room at the table ON
which she had her work. As snon IA
she discovered me she threw her slipper
at me and come ut NE oil the house
floor, but caught hold of her hands:
my son raw this and said PA" ] told
him that was not going to hurt moth
er. When she saw was not going to
trouble her, she went and dressed her
self in her Sunday clothes, and went
about ten yards from the h,:use she
turned arnu d and told me that she
was going to leave me. | repii, lit
looks very mich like it" This was on
Thursday. the 9th day OF February,
1875, and on the ETH of the same
month. she came back to my house it'll
four men aud ar OK wagon. Rudolph
Schauve, one Of the four itien; came to
lae und said lie wanted my wite's pro-
p,.rty. ! asked him if she had an order
from the court and lie said no. told
him that would get a witness aud in
I
asked him if she had an order from the
court, and SHE said no" Then in the
presence of my witness. l freely gave
up everything that belonged to her. l
went to BRENNAN and had this special
notice published in the Brenham BAN
NER: -
My wife, Anna Kiecke. having left
nv led and boa without provocati II,
notice is here given that will not pay
any debts contracted by her since the
Sth o. February. 1S75.-G. A. EIecHE
feel satisfied that have done az
much for my wife as was inmy power.
| bought her sewing machine aud a
washing machine; Also hired hands to
do tile washing and milking l plated
aud made my own garden tried 10
hire girl but she would not agree to
it, furnished everything she called
for. For these reasons don't see her
grounds for leaving me. About Ell h
teen months after she LETT me-. she
prosecuted me in the H n. County
Court of Washington county for an
assault and battery, and the jury rem
dered a verdict against me. made
motion for Il hew trial which was.
granted me by the court. The case
was then carried 10 Waller county on
change of venue. (whe,e she was the
best witness had) She stated under
cath thar l WIS dragging her aronnd ON
the tin,r when my son first came in.
She also stated upon oath that w
in another room when she broke he
door with her slipper and the blinds
with her fist; she stated further that
my son came In 1t that time. but when
she WINS asked. how many times my son
came in, she stated that he only came
once After this the jury retired and
in u few minutes returned q verdict of
rot guilty.
During the pending of This prosecu-
ton Rudolph Schsuve brought suit
against me for eighteen months board,
at $40 per month, without Having first
PRESENTED his account and demanding
it's payment, and without mott wing me
that nv wife Was boarding at his
house. Under the law can't see any
grounds Tor Schauve 10 bring suit
against me and furthermore my opn4
ION is that third person has no rig..f
to sue me for her board. before my wife
has an order from the court that she
could live separate from me Aud fur
tl,er,it is my opinion that third per
son has nu right tv sue ME for my wIie's
debts, after special notice wAs givei:
through the Brenhan BANNER, thar ]
would not pay any dett contracted By
my wife, Anna Kiecke, after the 9th of
FEBRUARY, 1876 The above mentioned
suit was brought id the CouhJs Couri,
and upon the trial thereof Mr.. Rudo. phi
Schuuv-, under oath stated thai he had
never rendered an acc unit against me-,
and that there never WAS contract
matte between US tor the settlement OF
her board. Here Comes in MIR. Freder-
lex Schauye (the rather of kuiolpb
Schauve) and states that had told him
that my house was t a pigeon house
thai she could fly in and Gut f as she
pleased. la reply / would sny that
about two years ago had converfa-
,ioc with +. SchaIve, IN which lie told
me that my wife never would come
buck to me. Ireplied that my house
WIS not a pigeon house TO hy in and
out she pleased, bat if my wife had
cume back To me BY herself, instead OF
coming with four men and an OK wagon
like they were going to Jake a foltihca-
ton. wien she well knew that was at
home alone.s he would have fuuni my
mouse open tor her at any time but
That ater such injury and blame there
WIS no piwer on earth that would corn-
pei me TO take such wife back again.
| know thai / have to provide for my
wife ualil Il divorce is grauled, but not
before she gets IN or er FROM the court
t. live se;rai ate from M. Iht,e never
forbade her living ut my house. until
aIvorce could b.. procured. but we
W uid not live together a. man ana
wiie. also said that | was wi ling To
furnish my wife with provisions OUT
SHE o nv house if she would call tor
hem, but that would not lay money
except Tor adoctor's bill.
T.le above $ u substantial statement
of priva' conversation that occurred
between Frederick Schauve, his Vie
aud myself. Schalve stated on oath
that tsaid fwa> willing to furnish MY
wife with provisions outside of my