The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-12-12
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURr-cHAMBERs.


Bixby W.. GibDs-Moton denied. with $40 costs OF
opposing same.
McCaiium Decentralization denied, with
$40 costs
Townsend vs.. The Mayor, &c.-ordcr granted.
Leyland vs.. Luidbcrg. Motion to vacats order OF
arrest granted, without costs.
Knox vs.. Mackay-I think this issue cannot be
tried IN an hour Motion denied; $40 costs, 10 abide
event
Prentiss VS.. Gibson.--rhe motion TO strike out Is
denied The receiver should give security for costs in
bond OF $500. No costs of this motion.
Compton VS. Smith Motion granted unless plain
TN spuate TO put said cause on calendar TO Try said
Issue AZ the first Circuit ut WIN ch II - reached In
order and pay $40 costs OF motion.
Young VS.. NoeL-Motion to vacgte order of arrest
granted, without costs.
denied as marked opposite the several paragraphs
the within order. No costs 10 either party.
Opdyke Vs. Badwtn.--On payment OF $40, costs OF
this motion, plaintiff may have leave file corrected
understanding nunc pro tune, aud ON nhDg suca I'M
ucrtakihB the motion VIII DC denied IL such bond DO
not hled within 1--WE days the motion Will be granted
with $40 costs.
Freid0erg vs.. Banngan.-N order, summons or
subpoena has been served on defendant ana fees
have been paid tendorod. The plaintiff desires to
examine ner as a witness think he cannot put her
IN contempt TIL no rst her with the order
subpoena or summons, ana pays tenders lees
Motion Tor attachment denied, but without costs.
Wchle vs. kauth (deceasedl --.ounsel must produce
the original papers and show some authority pro-
ceeding without making tho parties to
Marshall vs. MiIler.-Motion TO vacate tho order
granted The properly SO lar as shown to BIO in th ID
county IL tangible and may be levied on by the
reached on tho present execution, and nothing den-
mite Is shown as 70 defendants having moneys II Is
at most mere surmlso OF tho ailiant No costs.
In the matter OF Deborah A. Westerield. Tho
prayer OF tho petition should be denied, with COSTS
be taxed aud paid by the petitioner. SEQ memoran-
dun.
Tho Doutscho National Bank VS.. Somehow ct al. :
l think the defendants should be allowed TO put IN
supplemental answer on proper terms See Mono
randum.
BY Judge Donohue.
Noe vs.. Noe.-Motion denied.
BY Judge Barrett.
Levenson vs. Spro.-l am unable to settle this case
owing to the confused manner Ia which the depdsiton
not show the order in which the extracts read,
nor are such extracts speclned The parties should
arrange 1t between themselves as they ought to DO
able 10 do If they desire fair statement OF what
took place; II not the matter must bo brought up
ailidavits
By Judge Lawrence.
Mosson vs. Walsh.-Urdcr as resottled.
Kunzemann VS.. Elsbach.-I do not understand tho
object OF this application.
Chryslal vs. Allard; Hull VS.. Hobart and TeIlkampf
vs.. Goodchd. Orders granted
Cohen vs. Kemn-ln this case desire explana-
tion from the counsel presenting tho order.
SUPREME CoURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Donohue.
Sicklcs OF al VS.. Richardson, &c-Findings settled.
SUPERIOR CoURr-spECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Speir
r. B. Wincheil vs.. Eliza wincnelL-Report Of referee
confirmed and decree OF divorce granted.
Miller, SC, VS.. Levy ct a.-Counsel will attend bo-
fore me on Wednesday,, December IL, at twelve NJ,
settlement OF this case.
Talcott va. Standardization to vacate order Of ar
rest denied. Lot an order he settled on motion.
BY Judge Sodgwck.
Hamlin vs. Ulman.-Ordsred on special calendar Tor
14th December.
Jones vs. Notwithstanding on Justification ap.
proved
of Widows, &c, Of the Protestant Episcopal Church
Corcoran and others mos l, and 3l.-Reporl Of
referee confirmed and judgment OF foreclosure aud
sale ordered.
Willis, &C.. vs.. Chambers; Goetz va Noclko-
Actions discontinued.
COMMON PLEAs-spEcIAL TERM.
By Judge Van Hoescn.
Slberstein vs. Schih-Moton doned, with $40
costs to defendant, TO abide event
Webcl VS.. Shcren; Wondery vs. Brown.-Nhen an
order is presented drawn IN conformity with the de-
cision as rendered tho same will BIO signod and
othorwse.
In the matter OF Pitman-surctios should Justify
In double amount OF bond
Goodheart VS.. Goodhcart reason for making IN
order TO show cause IL assigned.
Condit vs. Warren.-Blank in order must DO filed
Goeoei vs. Martn.-order for examination OF de-
fendant vacated and set aside with $40
Hayman VS.. strohsahl; Kerrigan W.. Matthew; Grove
VS.. Sherwood. ppiication granted.
BY Judge J. 4. Daily.
Walsh VS.. New York Floating Dry Dock Com
pany.-Findings settled.
MARINE coUnr-cHAMBERs.
BY Judge Shea
Murray vs. Colns.-Motion denied
The Importers and Traders Bank vs.. st. John :
Rock vs. Campbell Goldsmith vs. Freese; Hocxtcr VS..
Mcycr-Motions gran ted.
Walker w. Craue.-Bond approved.
Peacock vs. Churchill Motion denied.
Fuchs vs. schmidt-Motion denied.
Gobicr vs.. decentralization denied, with $40 costs
TO defendant TO abide event
Richter vs. Eschellbacher; Lyons vs. Etzcusperger:
Costing vs. Pollock; Varnev w. Tracey; Courtney
vs.. Kehoe; Ferrigan vs. Lahey.-Orders granted
Lycoming Fire Insurance Company vs.. Stiiwcll
Jr-Moton to vacate judgment, &c, granted, as por
order.