Brenham weekly banner. [volume] (Brenham, Tex.) 1877-1907, 1877-04-27

treated as
acquired hot
der-d anythi
| the kitchen
was no NOR.
| The night b
| was raining pr
told ME that Mo-
my con could not
| replied that one dal
and that would re-
| sash. l worked untff
| after dinner. Whe9
sash up stairs my wifi
tic to cut out some
and when came in,S
cutting out the sl,e.9
which had been NJ
which was coycrcI
from the sash.
quiet manner th
waited until CO..
else cleaned it
swenelik," al
three tables il
this one. She I'll
practice of calm
uertr, tnle1,
She then came t
out OF her way am
room, and locked tNe1
through the window and q
who was then in the stabis
walking very slowly and | caliS
again to hurry up. that hin moths
gong to whip me. She soon
menred hammering on the d.
continued doing SO until she
She found out that she could nd
there, and she wei.t ont on the
and hammered against the blinds
broke Que of them. (She once stRs
under oath that she broke tue blind |
with her fist and the door with her
shoc.) When | opened the door she
WAS in the other room at the table on
which she had her work. As soon as
she discovered me she threw her slipper
at ME and come ut NE on the house
floor, but caught hold Of her hands;
my son saw this and said Pa" ! told
him that WAS not going to hurt moth
er. When she saw was not going TO
trouble her, she went and dressed her
self in her Sunday clothes, and went
about ten yards from the house she
turned around and told me that she
was going to leave me. / replied sit
looks very much like it." This WAS on
Thursday. the 9th day of February,
1915, and on the 18TH of the same
month, she came back to my house With
four men and an OK wagon. Rudolph
Schauvs. one of the four men, came to
nae and said he wanted my wife's pro-
perry. asked him if she had an order
nom the court and he said mo" told
him that would get witness and in
the presence of my witness l again
asked him if she had an order from the
court, and she said mo" Then in the
presence of my witness, freely gave
up everything that belonged to her. !
went to Brenham and had this special
notice published in the BRENNAN BAN.
NKR:
"My wife, Anna Kiecke, having left
my bed and boa d without proyocati IN,
notice is here given that | will not pay
any debts contracted by her since the
9Th OF February, 1S75.-C. A. KIEcHE.
feel satisfied that have done as
much for my wife as was in my power
| bought her a sewing machine and |
washing machine; also hired hands to |
do the washing and milking i planted
and made my own garden l tried to
hire a girl but she would not agree to |
it; furnished everything she called |
for. For these reasons don't see her |
grounds for leaving me- About ei=h-
teen months after she left me, she |
prosecuted me in the HIN. County |
Court of Washington county for an
assault and battery, and the jury rem
dered verdict against me. l made q |
motion for new trial which was
granted me by the cnurt. The case
was then carried to Waller county on |
change of venue. (wheie she WIS the |
best witness had.) She stated under |
oath that was dragging her aronnd on |
the floor when my son first came in. |
She also stated upon oath that | was |
in another room when she broke the I
door with her slipper and the blinds !
with her fist; she stated further that /
my son came in ct that time, but when |
she was asked, how many times my son
came in, she stated that he only came
once. After this the jury retired and
in few minutes returned a verdict of |
rot guilty.
During the pending of this prosecu-
ton Rudolph Schauve brought a suit
against me for eighteen months board,
at $40 per month, without having first
presented his account and demanding
its payment, and without notifying me
that my wife was boarding OF his
house. Under the law can't see any
grounds for Schauve 10 bring suit
against me, and furthermore my opin-
ION is that third person has no right
to sue me for her board. before my wife
has an order from the court that she
could live separate from me And fur
ther, it is my opinion that third per
son has no right to sue me tor'my wife's I
debts, after special notice WIS given
through the BRENNAN BANNER, that !
would not pay any Debt contracted by
my wife, Anna Kiecke, after the 9th of
February, 1875. The above mentioned
suit was brought in the County Court,
and upon the trial thereof Mr.. Rudolph
Schauve, under oath stated that he had
never rendered an account against me,
and that there never was contract
made between u<for the settlement of
her board. Here comes in Mr.. Freder-
lex Schauve the father of Rudolph
Schauve) and states that Ind told bIm
that my house WIS not a pigeon house
that che could fly in and cut Of ms she
pleased. In reply l would say that
about two wears ago had q cnnversa-