, 1877-01-24

ne Is STRONGLY IN FAVOR or THE COMPROMISE
DiLt+.
sr. Lor1e, Mo, Jan. .3.-Ex.senator Schurz
In al interview with the agent OF thu Wcatcrn
Associated i'rcss this afternoon, In reply IL
Questions addressed tn him. Easo tho following
us his upn1, TN tho Electoral bill HoU before
The United States Senate:
The hi, .cportr,l hy the Conference Committee
serves thu Aa,ne rn1 which ex-senator tEcHaertnn
and myself had IN view when. teseral wetEs ayo.
t1 er sfnut.
1uEenaNAcrKn or iMrAnr1AI1Tr.
and whn.e verdict ,rill command NHfeSnal respect.
rnppurtrd t'us. .lIayr" In !hn cainpara in s",i
iattt. aud fnr coua frat"ns Of ul>ic lnicre't And,
:,thrss iii nyc supps,ted fiov. Tildcn bn. what .hc
patriotic men Vi hth l'nrs!r" now want, and what
ascy ,1s csn"s ne .sFpu,, spatea I" int end
hr Hl1,AL 1ot ~. snd hc ,un.t nut cEcn aFpear IN
lave 1rru. Ille nut" tic frerscHsy ly 81. ulfte
IL. Of party pn"rs te legality ef which y 'l,st.
(ul itu put III All to speak here nf ihe tronbsrs
TINT might rnsur. Perhaps thr country would. In
sny cvr rr. rally TOR III" sake ~ rFaer
flnnc:l would fr
N1sxuAEly At THE MEncr or THE OPPOSITION,
which, Of cuhr.c, waGld grow immensely IN c3Hst.
u,lvnes at tnat sesy fart. The moral nnthurttr Of
the .Sus!onaI t;o,rrnnlcnt wGnld o. terribly ~taR'
rurd. End that IL L!wAys q tno.t ttaE-tfnIs eVh'
ditlu. OF tin:+ IN itspuh'1r. M"re"str. thr r"s.
vr.4ful Erto,t inthc exercise " doubtful 1n,"rfH
ts party toe lh' pnrp":n Of l!hln: ~ raHi'liais
iitn ttr i'rr.e:.eY w'ull 10 precedent frIH:ht
With the must pcsntc"ah eanretllrrt'* fnr Inn NJ
turc for tncn pftcrlrs afe alwaF. mt Gnly taken
al, unta.u VI. hut Improved upon 'r uB"r4t'a'Ius
c1trrur Importance that tho aecd.nn ~ The lftst
lrLt al cuntrsl 'aun1! b" removed fr'h tht tasa:a
nF party tlrf. aud referred to = tribunal no1 con'
ffUI}rst BY ;,asts intcersis.
THE TfthrHfC
i. that W many at aut ,nlisirxna 're only the
n.lcrt jmtnrd dialay brloFc the'. Atll nut what "
1 IL In CRtIRff'k* Hy
lsrpublear~ ..at, In the a'srhcr "l legislation nh
that r1,nj.rl lht President If The scarte hae thr
constitutional r.lMrf To r,1Int NIL aEflEFc thu
tI"ctora vile, anI IN ft Icutorras!c rlie that In
the pt,-rutr ut legislation sa*t tho ps;ncipte> "t
thu t,yruty ,.rr nir rt mHri 1c hlntl ned. Wn1rh
wn,!,i ,,"t ,tr dev-fan lntu s.c haus IT lhe I'rm
orrate nrs ,orlfy rf The llu.e. rhc nne shcnry.
it tl+a+suu,sa. would sl:ct sia}c, md the ashsF
Iil..sp. Il i n"1 .'soh ho that. ia il.e abscnsc
pt j,t..!alou. sssh n1rtltt would ur*1st their Att'
yants. ~, III c.,n-rlutnfu III Which ~e Ga!.At DC
eur.e', ~ltta cantsst beswtcn
4 rRE.lnEST AMI \ COtNTEn~fME@tbfST.
1uill tut tr.Ar now which Of these two tAtnrlet
i tnst l.ht. sa: 80 ts3 'ss"t the s.cnce -
| u.t he, iuun asrcneu "f lrss!atthn; In th!s casc
,ee t.'nttrt nee Committee as oi'rTtaEs hs. That
NJ" al,hoHsI IL ny ui.Iniuu. the "ojcet"a thai 1t
il nIE.nstyr to lhe tunsl!luln c4nstit bs malii'
'.ae4; tut .Go Ill! has that ~, y!.s4s Which: IN
q.r.,lon to anyaoty, - .'pe you ~, x1pesi,: !.
deciding H. ,ls iresiaenttal eoe1ss,, II;
t,1a Provided " II tns can's'snSn c.%, ,,, ni
% M ass tf. 90 IM ans"s1 ,S" but tr:S'insi ot ssa
M randia nan ha. any tsason !" expect IN unjust
verdict u lurs the thug ihs 'onrt15 stAna, ~ f's'
rAKsf tkAnsRs si1ovLn .'oHstnGu
wei! whtlhrr tIty ean s4orl to put thct respective
patti. a pas,l"a tn whssh 'hsy n,s! apRsa1 H.. -
ths "puu.llion vsed by .otns VI the gen1leuen u
C"ngts*s the bill psoesrI. tio!n c9l.ss.snt!ous