The New York herald., 1877-12-06
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURr-CHAMBERs.
BY Presiding Judge Davis

Nelson W. Martin aud others -Granted
Kohlsaat vs. Uevoe; Greenwich Savings Bank va
YounGs; Same VA same; Goeiet va Ellis; People vs..
American Popular Lite Insurance Company; Hanks
VS. kelso; Security Savings Bank VS.. smili; Mayor,
&C., vs. Gothwald; Mayor, &c, Va Hogs Mayor, &C.,
Scnwarzler; Noses vs.. Samucls; Murray VS. Will
iams; Murphy W. Gerlitz; shortwsll va Dupuy;
and others Vs.. Meyer; johnson vs. Aartin.-Orders
granted.
Russell va GItzgerald.-Order granted denying
motion.
Philips Va Bachia.-Memerandum
Henlin va Powers-Motton granted. Defendant al
lowed hlo case &c, within ave days without costs
Best vs. McGrath Tho plaintiff may discontinue II
oil the funds In his hands without costs OF opposing
motion. Otherwise motion denied with $40 COSTS OF
Phillips va. Dounoly.-The motion 10 denied: SO
costs OF opposing tho may abide the event OF
the and be taxed 10 defendant he succeeds In
the action.
spauiding va Martin.-rhe error in the statement
Is such TO require correction. Tho motion may
stand over for further affidavit on The subject and be
brought on tho l2th INST on serving such afhdavn
anu Two days. notice 20 plaintiffs attorney.
Graves va Lavia-Motion denied, with $40 costs to
Mack VS.. Cohp.-The plaintiff may take tho order at
his peril. No doubt the trial Court will rigldly
forco the rule In point here On Tor Arst Friday Of
Marsh vs.. Woosey-I think all Tho ordors should
De vacated and set aside imprudsntly granted II
Is now shown, which did not appear before, that de-
cndant d0es transact business In person AZ his
ofioc, Dut has Deen confined for long time In Brook
should be without COSTS
Trenton Banking Company vs.. Duncan.-Defendant
may have leave to nle the supplemental answer within
ten days OF tho entry Of order herein paying $40
costs OF opposing mosiou
Aaron Va Burgheim and others.-Tne motion should
be denied, with costs, but without prejudice to its re-
nowai on aldavits on the part of defendant on pay
ment OF the costs hereby allowed.
Moore vs.. Shaw-Motion denied; memorandum.
by Judge Lawrence.
Costello vs. Mead.-Order does not conform TO deci-
Chester VS. GamewcIl-Order granted.
Rohrbcck VS.. Goebler.-Thaycr Manufacturing Com
pany VS. Lazigan.-Grantcd.
Bloomfield vs. Gearty.-Granted.
In the matter Of Jetior. r.-Urdcr us rosettled.
Bloch vs.. Bloch h--Reorrcd 10 D. A. Casserly to
amount should bc alowca TO the plaintiff for Tempo
rary alimony ana Tor counsel lee In this action
SUPREME coURT--sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van Worst
Morrnrguc VS.. Kegna-Scc memorandum
Lounsperry vs. .Pottcr.-Demarrer TO answer over
ruled with liberty to piaintn TO reply upon terms
Op,n,on.
Methodist Episcopal Church at Harlem vs. Tho
Mayor Judgment for defendant on demurrer.
OPINION.
the plaintiff ON tho demurrer with liberty TO The do.
fendants TO answer IN ten days on payment OF COSTS
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM
BY Judge Van Hocsen
In the matter OF Observation-Disclosures ordered.
In the matter OF McA elan; Trustees OF Astor L.
brary vs. Risdon.-Appli cations granted
Winiams vs. Goak!n-Commission ordered.
singer Manuiacturing company vs. MaiuD.-App-
cation granted.
Mckee VS. Fahcrly. Receiver appointed
Dunn vs Monahan.-Judgment vacated and cause
ordered Gale cndar.
Raihman W.. Rathman. Mo reason is givon for tho
making OF nm order TO show cause SEQ section $50
Cow
Casey vs.. New York Central and Hudson River
Railroad Company; HougntaIing VS.. johnson. Order
TO advance cause granted
Ross VS. stevens; Gossago va Stcvons-hotion to
dsmiss complaint granted
BY Judge Larrcmorc.
Jackson VA Jackson--Order settled.
MARINE CoURT--CuAMDERs.
BY Judge Shea.
Kltching w. schwartz; hcad VS.. Swartz; Habcrman
VS.. Rcichman; Wilson VS.. Taylor; Wilson Muir
ray-Moti0ns granted for short opdar
Goodman We k0ninsky.-Moti0n TO override de-
murrcr frivolous anu for judgment granted.
Rarih VS.. Mcdonald gs disni isscd, with
Gusts.
Hail VS.. Ginncrcr. .--Juigment for plaintiff for
$549 2S
Boyd vs. Van Zandt.-Demurrcr sustained.
by Judge Sheridan.
The Columbia Gram stcamina Company vs.. Shay
Motion denied
Cohen vs. kuhn.-Case settled.