The New York herald., 1877-12-01
DECISIONS
uPREME couRr-cHAMBERs.

BY Judge Lawrence
North Shore Staten Island Ferry Company Va Drew;
~ In sSe mater Of North American Petroleum Com
pauy; Ripley vs.. Nostrand; Morrison Vs. Douglass;
Peoples Bank Va Hurst; shoudy va. Frisbee; Will
iams va Stewart; De Bremout vs. De Bremout.-
Granted.
In the matter Of Mauder.-I wish TO counsel in
regard to this matter.
! Iawton va shepAert-Order granted.
In the matter Of Grace Church, Harlcm.-Thore must
be o reference an this case.
tioncrs i association OF which am member this
matter must 60 before another justice.
Everett vs. Aen.-l require the summons and CON-
plant and affidavit OF regularity in this case.
Becker VI. Bee0e. 0e.-Explanation required.
Crosby VS.. Day.-Tne suretios appear 10 bo amply
sufficient and on the the testimony do not sec
what objection be raised in regard to them.
Hall va Brlt.-rhe difficulty In this case can bc
avoided by directing reference TO take the
ton OF Mrs. Britt, In Queens county. Such order
Will be made II the plaIutii elect or II he desires TO
contest the question OF the defendant's residence
there may be a reference Tor that purpose.
Matter OF McCorma ack.-The bond Of the committee
is usually required TO be in double tho value OF the
the present instance large, and thcre is nothing In
the papers showing the inability Of tho committee to
give such security If such inability IL be
shown by affidavit and the Court can then It's dis
erection accept security on lesser amount
Marcus va Herpick.-The injunction should bo con-
tinued until the case can DO tried Before tho goods
left the ship ami delivered TO the customs author
OF mis- intention to exercise the right OF stoppage in
transit The transit had not ended In contemplation
OF law when the notice was served Tho case OF Fras
cheris W.. Henriques, AbbE N. s. 25l, differs
from the present In the essential feature that
tho notice OF the piains intention TO exercise his
right OF stoppage served until after the goods
had been entered At the Custom House ana had Joen
warenou subjected 10 the control oil the de-
fcndant The Case OF Harris vs. Pratt II N. Y. 249,
$50, appears TO 10 control this Injunction
continued
Wood VS. Smith cannot enforce tho dcfondants
without bond Is presented.
Miller W.. Leash --Aidavit oi regularity required
Hart w. Pcttitt &c -Explanation 10 desired.
In the matter OF Norwood, &c.-Order granted.
McD0nald VS.. DAVIS; Everett vs.. .Alcn.--Grantcd.
SUPREME CoURT-spECiAL TERM.
Bv Judge Van vorst
Ritch vs. Schlcsngcr OF aL-Caso and amendmer cts
settled.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Spcir.
Bond va. Wolsh.-Order denying motion for dis
Ciapp va The Metropolitan National Bank-order
Moore ct al vs. Colc.--Ordor granted and undcrtak-
Wray VS.. fcdaikc.-Case as settled ordered on nIo
by Judge Scdgwick.
Bell vs. Bell Order settled.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Larremore.
Lewis w. Acker; In the matter OF Arlhanan; Adams
VS.. Hovey See decisions.
5llverstcin va Schicn-Proposed Issues by plaintiff
and defendant allowed
In The matter OF Frankenhcimer. &c.-Report con-
1rmed and decree entered relieving assignee.
brown VS.. Gaaudet.- Allowance OF two and half
per cent granted
Canetec vs. Arnold James vs. Walker; in the matter
OF Mccoy; French va McCiusxey; IN tho matter VI
GiIcson III the matter OF iiirsch Mckee Flahery.-
Applications granted.
NolIy va Farman.-Roport confirmed and decree or.
dercd
Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company VS.. Craigin.-
Motion granted.
In the muttcr OF Retzlcr-Application to change
name granted.
Nolan vs.. CotterclL Lien vacated.
Shannon VS. Ihlcnburg.- --Rcceivcr appo. ntod.
Johnson VS.. Woodruff Proceedings dismissed with
$40 costs.
Kahn Va BRAKEMAN. Appeal dismissed, with SIC
costs
Poudlr vs. Birmingham. pplicaton for ionvo to
sue granted.
Ro-s va stevens; Gossage VS.. Stevens. .-Compa "a
Dismissed with costs aud costs of motion.
vrcdenuurgn vs. Chiids.-Mosion granted and sealed
commission orucred
D,Ileber VS. Knickerbocker LILO Insurance Com.
pany-Caso and exceptions settIcd.
Ioiiwagen va koIlwagcn-Motion granted, with
costs; rec decision.
Calsins vs. knapp Motion denied, with costs.
Wheeler vs.. shorL-Sec me morandum.
Reeves W. Reeves--sec memorandum for counsel
MAXINE coURT-cHAMDEns.
by Judge McAdam.
West VS.. Ehlcrs; Haas vs. Kahn; Hess vs. Benncr-
Opinions Med.
Bernstein w. Lambcrt McIntyre VS. Woiss; Astor
vs. scibetheimer; Kyle vs.. Healy; Same w. Null
Gclhy higgins Va Doughery; kyic vs.. ClabDy.-
judgments
Mlcnaeis W. Prahcr.--Arrcst vacated
snith vs. Cran Gilman Hopkins; Mars vg.
Wnodsatei Nich"ons W Wittkoski; SchwcGb cfscr W.
Bakcr-Motions granted.
Paten VS. MeyeE-Stay Of proceedings vacated
Char vs. harrson Winter vs. scumcdcs-An-
swcfs stricken as snam
Dafth w. McDonald.-Pfoccedings dismissed
Hess W.. Csrroil.-Judgnicnt set aside.
Damzak W. Giauz.-Undcrtaki M IN $50 with new
surety ordered
Stacey vs. HerkimOr-M ). v. House appointed