The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1877-09-15
CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CO
SEPTEMBER TERN, 1877.

The Sept term of the Circuit Court commence
ed at ToWsontown on Monday, 10th inst, Judges
Ye lot and Walters on the bench. TIE unfinished
business of the May term was disposed of. Geo.
Banks, Philip Daman and Samuel Koyer, convict
ed of larceny, were sentenced to the penitentiary
the first named for one year and the last two for
two years each. After entering up few judg-
ments, as of the May term, Judge Yellott tempo
rarily withdrew FROM the bench and Judge Wat
tiers, saying he understood the Grand Jury for the
May term had not been finally discharged, had
them called (none answering to their names) aud
discharged. The May term was finally adjourned
and the Grand Jury for the September term called
and sworn in, and Vachel W. Baseman, of the
I'd district, made foreman. Judge Waters made
the charge. stating tlas5A only one matter to
which he felt called upon to refer specialy-that
of his brother members of the Court, who had
been presented by the late Grand Jury. 1t would
devolve upon the present Grand Jury to dispose
of this presentment. In their investigation the
jury should act without fear, favor partiality,
etc.
After the charge to the jury Judge Yellott re-
sumed his place ON the bench. The original, trial
and magistrates appeal dockets were preiminari-
ly called. Over three hundred cases have been
transferred from the trial docket to set docket
prepared at this term. The following cases were
disposed of on the trial docket Henry McShane
& Co. VS.. Alfred j. Gent, off; Benz Blottenber-
ger vs. David Cowen, off; Simon Lecron, admin
istrator VS.. Daniel Vondersmith, Judgment for
plaintiff. by confession, for 1881. 20; II. Downing
& Co. VS.. Samuel W. Worthington, judgment for
plaintiff, by confession on terms to be filed :;
Same VS.. Same, same disposal Alfred Ijams VS..
Joseph W. Fowble, same judgment; Augustus
Hester VS.. w. T. Baldwin, judgment for plaintiff,
by confession, as above; Jacob S. Winemier VS..
Jos. V. Wnemiller, judgment for plaintiff, by de-
fault, with leave; Thomas j. Ayres vs.. Abraham
E. Chilcoat and Josiah S. Pearce, off John 7.
Johns vs. Peter INDIGESTION, judgment for plaintiff,
by default; J. & J. Frey VS.. Thomas Mcdonnell,
judgment for plaintiff, by default with leave;
Joseph Friesman John Schilinger judgment
as above; The Mayor and City Council of Balti-
more VS.. J. e. Lloyd judgment as above; Kann
&c Sons VS.. VIM. Holmes, judgment above; J.
J. Turner Co. VS.. James Almony, judgment for
plaintiff, by confession, for Sl3O.l9; Same VS..
James T. Price, judgment for plaintiff, by default,
for Slle: Charles Gore vs.. John Kearney, judg
ment for plaintiff by confession, on terms to be
filed Elizabeth Lester VS.. Samuel X. Harris,
Judgment for plaintiff, by default, for $3.50;
Noah Worthington of John James L. Verney,
judgment for plaintiff, by default, for property
plevied Francis White, executor, vs. VIM. Kemp
er, judgment for plaintiff by confession, on terms
to be fled Benjamin L. Cook VS.. VIM. j. and
Laura V. Burneston. judgment for plaintiff, by
default, with leave Benjamin e. Cook VS.. Sam
uel Burneston, judgment for plaintiff, by confess
sion, for S334.72; Elizabeth c. Potter VS.. Daniel
Claridge, Judgment for plaintiff, by default, for
1865 damages; Joseph Hoshall, for Martha w.
HoshalI, VS.. Sarah J. Bull and John S. Berry, adj
minstrators, off: Cornelia W, Cooper VS.. Same,
off; John Lensenmeier vs.. Gustav Ruppersberg
er, judgment non pros. under the rule: Eli S. Sau
bic VS.. Vim. w. Bosey, John H. Zouck and Geo.
W. Jordan, judgment for plaintiff, by default, for
$11015, with interest IRON date, and costs Hen
ry A. Gable VS.. A. j. Lyons judgment for plain
tiff, by default, for $1,00S.61 with interest from
date, and costs Marvin c. Stone VS.. Herbert
H. Harrison; Judgment for plaintiff, by default,
for $335.40, with interest from date and costs
James johnson VS.. Joseph NJ. FowbIe, Judgment
for plaintiff, by confession, for $12l.S0, with in
terest from date, and costs VIM. w. King vs. II.
Albert Cooper, judgment for plaintiff for S155.77,
with interest from date, and costs; VIM. ii. Nc
COnkey VS.. VIM. Holmes, Judgment for plaintiff
by default, for 53l6.S3, with interest from date,
and costs; VIM. X. Carroll VS.. Isaac S. Crowther
Same VS.. Same; Same VS.. Same; Same VS.. James
A. McCauley, John NJ. Stewart and Wm MGR.
Benthal Same VS.. Jas. A. McCauley, David N
Stevens and Sebastian Brown Same vs. James
A. McCauley John NJ. Stewart and VIM. McR
Benthal (ejectment suits), judgment for plaintiff
in each case, by default for the property described
in the declaration, and costs.
TUESDAY, Sept. 18th.
IL. IL. Graw LIST district Owen Z. Riley, 9th
district, and Samuel N. France, 18th district were
drawn to serve on the petit jury, in the place of
John Wethered, Cumberland Dugan and Halbert
Hoffman, excused. Charles Gore VS.. John Kear-
ney judgment for plaintiff for S36229. Joshua
Frederick VS.. Hosea Frederick; Judgment for
plaintiff for S115.15. Henry Messner VS.. John
w. Cole and Florenz Miller; judgment for plain
tiff for S2540S and $500, cost OF protest. Harri-
son Hopper VS.. John I. Shipley, John F. Shipley
and Grafton Bowen; judgment for plaintiff for
S25SO2. The 0ld-Town bank of Baltimore vs..
William II. R. Watts; judgment for plaintiff for
$15S75. J. Loeber VS.. Henry; judgment for
S1I47. Emanuel Trine Patrick O'Bren and Geo.
w. Wade VS.. the State, use of Conrad MulIin APP
peal from Justice Richardson ; judgment below for
appellee for SS6.l2 and $1.55 costs; affirmed,
Dr. John Stevenson VS.. Eliza j. Brown; appeal
from Justice Cross; judgment below for Brown,
claimant of property levied upon; judgment re-
versed and for return of property. Joseph Kras-
tel, supervisor of the Baltimore and Jerusalem
turnpike company, VS.. Francis Willicke; appeal
from Justice Bonsal; judgment below for Willicke
for 1861 and S4.6S costs; affirmed
va Peoples Primary meetings at usual places