The Iowa plain dealer. [volume] (New Oregon, Howard County, Iowa) 1867-1895, 1877-02-23

~@a~---.-44----~-.~~a--~~~-
TINE ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL.
MnSnA,. feb. a. The commission n~~e,u.
lr,i Ia thu af..r,nui, i received the rtrtih.
ealer and accompanying prlerr III tis sasr ~
IoaisAnn fr.,tt TN rvr~ftk ,,flleet NJ thr julit
convention ~ tsasrst-. Al Adjournment tiil
Tuesday WAS tl'cn vsAfd.
TUESDAY, frb IN. T'l,r rU,,nl~sIon crtefe.l
nlrn, TIN consideration ~ tlir ieslI-lsi,s ea~.
and listened IL tir arguments VI cm,na.i
arWnnuu IL The hnty III appearing fur tn
,EI,r,ar. kriaim Mritnsld I'D ~ l@l,Alf
~ tlr Democrats. " rs.i ~ il' election
NJ is1s i.t ~, ~ ts,iislai,a lad lsfh ~
complied with tIm law. mud il,us i,w pre-
ln~ssl ~ ~l,ow thu law lind mt l.en c.tIts
i,Iin wit, III tir present ease. A t1,H,laf
majority Had iaiH '.,rt.h w sl,t~
lizard. through actual fraud. They Ind
lhrmn nWilr ti,r returns ~otd ilian, Wy tlo
lNul2r officers. and Ind taken The tejH,Ftsui H.
supervisor. ~ ll.Kistfatloi W their place. l,tii
oven this they did ,,oi f,ll,w NJ at tisW.. Tn
,as,,lr ~ ~istysssliM ts,lls had la.n di.fsHns
rl,a.l, Mr. Ml,nia.i na' nieiild tIiat ii,s ra,,'s
ni~xio, lad tl,e right, and u Mas their duty. ~
consider iI,u information III IH,rrr~sl,i ~ tlH
twe Inntsea, Their duties WIRE Inlirinl. ind
merely clerical. and h. c.uinrei ilnln
b. carefully weigh the evidence IN
liz ip~~..&i'M ~ Tho "" l.o'~. ~
.le' .,~ Il, were r.. s', ", N, ae. 4. y
rr.iuw tie election III tn ~srfal parishes.
taking ~ n basis ~ facts tie t.ssiIs,piiy ia..
f.ae tia tlvnsa js',iisia,a insesiigaiinK e,a'r
mites, with thu. Incidental rlalhi That iltls
lsStIustU Ms jsul.f evidence N ~ ru,Hl.ls
uItsd w thu eUsnirls~l.,il. IN r.tAlstHi'H'. W.
asked that ii,e mural light NJ the Universe
Nigh, 10 Hilpwed ~ rt,l,W uppt tlhs ifails.
/ A ~. La Ia
nj III this ll.inrnInR lizard. Alf. llntlIh'i.
Tor Tie ls,1a,l,ihast~. afu.rd tl'ei ksllsFA
.aa ,a legal tlusfiipa III Louisiana N iln
rr.seni .l,tila, and that Millinery Ind III
4ia,iow ~ elaina 10 !l,u oilire. ltu,ra tl.e
iIaspa .lurtufs we're In pnIy oI.ra That n.i.
H. al~U argued NJ kgili against the a.inilH-io.
IT ssileiiee aiti gs,ltE la'iitid tile fst,tf,ia
DECLARING that ii,n fleinfnng lizard Nm. \ legal
h.sl,. and IL dst#pn iiial. VI. tlD~s mat
ul,lfe~4sd illr roi,'irlsrinn ~, isi,Mit ~ tn
IlaInilLHli ulI.fl,fr. Ills argument Nas
kslls,gi certificates, and thu. irt.H,tlattts II
lltt,@o natlu np Wy \ nm, wie Ind Nc sHll
claim III thu Dflles ke,niuf Carpenter fuIluwtsl
u,i behalf III thu Democratic ubI.TtMr liz
said Ii. did lpd aliaaf TN Kain,.el I. Iill",,. 4
grt,ilr,tiai, Nlmn lta ald i,vi kn.,~, and Will.
whom lM had ~ sympathy, hut ~ appeared
FIR tD,lNM h.kal voters ~ lN,.,lsiaila who lial
lrun hlHffatehiMd ny f..ir Villains ~h,~G nlll.
eai tItir Ii tlir lhdnrllilR ltafhuf l<'tslsiAi,a
Mr. Carpenter held That ilt js,WsJa ~ the
e.ann,issiu, wire MT judicial That u WAS
lntling i,u,te ti,mi,H committee VI inss~itAa-
tiuis, innAIniiul ~ Congress. according ~ III.
iri,- III sile law creating ", hal the l1,wst u
approve ~ reyprM IL dsclHIul,, ~ ~aw H.
ttu them Melt ihto MI AliAlyais III tia stattiir
law " Isnit-lai.a relating ~ elections, littitri,.
lnH lizards. uif. Mih claimed NAL the Elretish.
law ~ tie state f''y sl,r,intll.s elertur. i y,
violation III tl.u constitution " the kMla AMI
II thu United states. The ev,in,is~la.. al.
Ip,ifted hfusu Mr.. Carpenter concluded l,if
argument.
ii ihe commission. as.teliatnf Carpenter ~
.unaL Ills argument, ennt.iaiIng that Tie es,,,.
~tituiio. II thu United AtAlaH forbade eu,,fet.
ting judicial power uIu,i ir Returning lt'nIsi
III thu United Ntaier. aild that lllu law ~ tlis
state whIel attempted II confer a,rl, ls,wel
MAS suiL. Tie Returning lizard. hsA 4 ls,..
sss4si judicial tn,wuIs. llAd gstia outside In
privilege. The statute require. tlnleAsH returns
Iii W. iiNsla within tNei,ts lHaif~ All H,hll
riur,a were iint made Within iifi'st, da,r. lta
slsnu,l,Med In litter terip~ tls n.t,lsfs "
iIe Returning Hard. And said i careful AMI
lfoilgi, eAaininatlpn ~ tha eArs' w the e.,t,l.
tllIH~Istl N,nill ~ uH,fu IN Wsiuft tK'Aru III
Isnii~Iai,A than regiment ~ soldiers. Al liz
euiWnsl0u ~ Mr.. tArlsniers argument. ltuis,.
illo,n wefu introduced 4, di~',is1 tlie admis.l.
debate ii,e ~ll,lo case. iiM f,plAr prevailed,
Tho latter bsnR rejected. Aiicf rllun feesl4~.
Lyman Irpmlull i,n,k tho n.slf and rfsH.tiai
| With hls argument, sayiug that they. wete
tsiiglll fAee " face will the question: wh6ll.i
ttunisleni .,i TIN United states Il ~ W. tlass
shrna,gl tta'ih a,td villain, ~ ll.s part " I'M.
riAl~ whose duty u wAs u .s,'p tho certificates
There WAS III .iMf uiltnf tribunal ~ which ~
tunti could H. made except tlIs tribunal. liz
sls,kr ii tle tribunal A. tlr tribunal III tltn twu
lusOs vi t.stksu~~, ttMd II ~. hr Ashcd. that
tho cilxtitnltl, lad ii,alu ~ provision sKali1l
the inauguration, ~ President BY forgery and
frand. and hy 4 conspiracy lst~aen Thu tneil
~ho certify ~ Ills eluetiu,,2 IT. fpli hmnIials.!
that 4. ejtIxun ~ tn republic l.u m. rallied
mirnn u argue this a,t.l,,,i iWfole i national
tribunal. Mr.. lfnmbiill agreed that II MAS l,el
mi, ~. right but tl.e duty ~ tin ss,',isslos
~ W q. tlw very isatom facts ~ W.
elected electors Ii. Louisiana. III wri,I
| inln general review ~ l<nti~laiN affairs. AiH
made what II elaisned IL i* iiA abie.t arKn
mint In behalf NJ 1Ildrn ~ delivered ls,fnfs
thu e.aImi43iun. H. WAS followed BY n. "
htnlgiloi, u. tie Republican stiu, ~iO AtH,lat
AMI hal Iuwar ~ MiHnttll, III. s.tu ail flilAll,
certify Ii. II .stiAd IL him thai The desi4i,,i
III illu commission IN the fkfidA rass sial.l
mined The entire ,ulestls,.. here fnlrtl A. ~ III
tHhl ~ tha snssi,IIsalal, NJ ~ lslllld Tin actin
III i,e ttinriilg lt,srI, and hi could ~,
perceive that ANY usi.eltai ttale|
I.aa ilH main question. ~sS M,
utAti fnf MrHitlniit. In ratH'isislsa
ii. ssld Talk Il, i'm about outrage. fraud
and Observation-Disclosures III sHurs, There Nj
lw0 wua III The question: and " y4ti III h.t
IL W. lark AMI sHtsAss Nass tun ~ here 1
asltllIn.i.t thu lMwaof ltnlslaia. and YIN H,,ip
ADMINISTERS tlssn b, lusrniN ~hp have i.e
dtwlrAsAttI2tsl and what MA thu lawful s.au il
thai htAiu II, harmony with her law
And mt III hsrhNi,, With ihe vii Il
i tmny.' ~. ntelial,afHer i,esi Ahltsk~su
The commission III ihe aai,ie rtde. III argue
tl,at kslugg wss ila ftRhifi tiosu,sr 4
Louisiana. that lh1 Returning Hard ~
lsgsl hht, that ihu. electors obisHt.d " wef
nd Ineligible. and ll.st II Il lini competent II
tho unsints.ioI, ~ ~ bthind tlle action III hi
i,eiurning hard TN The pnftute ~ flullIl
mt whai happened IN tih eAsttiss NJ Dnaittiis
iinn he4t.,a,i IN tin slatnit.
tHrAatAt f.h -, Argument IL, Til adn,I4
ability u .ssidsnee IN The italieiana cast ~
fts,tnaed William 81 vyAtte. ii ltrlutkttral