The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1877-07-17

from custody, De TOJKVGLLE returned to
England. His wifc's relatives did not re-
main idle. however and through their efforts
the Austrian Crown Advocate was put in
possession of certain Information respecting
the previous career Of De TOURv1LLE. and
by his direction an indictment was found
against the accused last spring. An extra
dition warrant was then procured, and DE
ToURv1LLE was given up by the British
authorities and brought to Botzcn. This
new Indictment which charges DE Tour
vILnE with having laid violent hands ON his
wife, and with having killed her by repeated
blows with stones ON her head, is Curl
osity. In it it Is set forth that had the
Commission before which DE Tour
VILE was tried in 1915, known that
the mother of DE ToURvILLE's first wife,
ELIZA BRIGHAM, had been killed by the dis
charge of Il revolver in his hands a. he was
explaining its mechanism to her, and that
10y the will of his second wife, he was to re-
ccivc Slsj,O0O, il would never have released
him.
The trial under this indictment was
commenced June 49, As new evidence,
the deposition Of ALBERT GLYNN, curatc
Of St Peters, Liverpool was read. In
this IL was sworn that the accused had
said TO him. in 1868, that he knew how
to get rid of mothcrs-n-law and wives;
the former might be shown the mcch-
ani-u Of n revolver which would acct
dcntaly go Of; the wife should be taken to
the Continent. whore she would look ut some
picturesque scenery and fall. Now, this
deposition was, Of course. most injurious TO
l.,F.,t had
tuuity t. cruss-cNamnc GLYNN. "a he was
rcAcvcdby the court from appearing. having
declared that he could not leave his church.
On being examined in England, this curatc
failed to recognize the photograph OF pE
TorEv1LLE shown him. but an English de-
tcctyc named CLARK was allowed ON the
trial to explain this failure as being due to
weak cycsight. For the defence "A report of
the proceedings of April Is, ls6s, which end
ed IN the jury returning verdict Of "acci-
dental death in the case of DE ToURVILLEs
mothcr-in-law, Mrs. BRIGHAM, was read
CLARK, the detective. however, when OH the
stand. produced u piece of bone flom the
portion of Mrs BlIGHAM's skull whore the
bullet had entered. and two surgeons CON
ncctcd with the court explained to the jury
that the fracture showed that the bullet
must have penetrated from below. The de-
teciivc then gave evidence about a fire which
occurred in the prisoners house in London
in iS7l. The police report said that both DE
louHV.LLE ana his son were in great dan
ger, ana were saved by a policeman. CLARK
said that DE IoURNlLLE took no trouble
about the child, and II was almost stiflcd
when brought down. CLARK expressed the
opinion that the fire was not accidental.
Tie Court and jury went from Botzen to
Tlaioi TO inspect the scene of the alleged
murder, AMI ON IN" way they stopped over
night al 1'rdi, where they visited the
grave Of Madame DE IoukNll.LL III the
Protestant hullHi Siouhu' AnoN' IL Is" Nhite
pEidln" rearing th' lh~'i'pH"ii' III English
!" ihr memory "l MA"DAl'lN MlLLti''
Wllr" i hLN'N plLuhoNNh i"tHNiLLh' ono
'"'' ON Tine lo'l "i July l''o' aged -
GA Tine return TO bo'%oh' the evidence OF
tn' experts was heard NV" phlS.''"h7'
"ho' Oh 'he hfS' ,rial' ma aooptco the ny
l"'"'7l7 "i s"'''i'' no" "'''' IT. l"s7'"".
-, MAINTAINING '""' '"' S'"P' was 80 S'"u-
u"' 'i"' woman c"u'' h"' '"'"" n''7'',
n"WH III Su'H " way a. !" '""7' "'"'u "h'l
'i'l 'l' 'i''"'''I "i 'ho Nvu'i''' 9"""'n
th'E were h"' scl-lllll'lN' lh'i inc TWO
surgeons "i inc court 7'','' 'h'lr t"'Vt!'
ACCORDING l" W"i'" 'N' prisoner iu7"'" "I
lnl'" ms WIG from Tue road one must
nave i"l''n GOWN lace foremost on inc
stone ana 'l'H pY' n'' arm out "i J'l'
IL 10Y lH"H 'i''''' "''"'"','- i" '"'''
'"''IE' sprung "'o' h''' anu "H''' sn'
! o""ld %'' up "'.'','" WIN 9i"'i Stones 'h'
""''li'7 on the h"'h CO.. h'T h''u' ne th'H