Arizona citizen., 1877-12-07
L 0 CAL AA TIERS.
District Court Proceedings.

Proceedings in District Court of Plnal bounty, Arizona, for the week ending De- .cember 6, 1877:
 Territory Of Arizona vs. E. A. Sake. On motion Of the District Attorney, a nolle prosequi was entered in this cause.
 Lotus DePuy vs. Mary DePuy In this ease the Court filed its findings and con- .clusions of law, and filed also a decree for record.
 Often X Loss vs. P. R. Brady, Sheriff Of Pinal county, L. NJ. Jacobs and others. This case came on regularly to be heard before the Court, Messrs. Hardesty and summers appearing for the plaintiffs and Messrs. Reymert and Goodrich for defen dants. The opening statement was made by MT Hardesty, and after the introduce ton and examination or witnesses on the part of the plaintiffs and the introduction of documentary evidence on the part of plaintiffs and defendants. and after hear Ing the arguments of counsel on both sides, the Court took the case under ad- visement
 Nn. A0dTlbS Mason. The motion Co strike out certain portions of the answer in this case. was denied by the Court, and plaintiff except led.
 Austin & Dempsey vs. Milton Ward. In this case the Court filled it's findings and conclusions Of law and ordered decree en- tered in favor of plaintiff.
 On motion of c. H, Oury, Esq, 1t was Iordered that Henry G. Hicks be admitted to practice as an attorney in this court.
 On the application of J. H. Cox, for ad- mission to practice as an attorney in this court, Messrs. Oury and Hardesty were appointed committee to examine into the qualifications Of the applicant The committee reported favorably and Mir. Cox was admitted.
 Solomon ShuItz vS. Solomon Mund. The motion to vacate and set aside the order appointing c. P. Howe, Receiver in this lease was argued by counsel and taken under advisement by the Court.
 NJ. H. Hamilton vs. Charles Whitlow. Special demurrer argued by counsel on both sides-su0mitted and taken under .advisement by the Court.
 Territory Of Arizona vs. c. T. Hayden. Ordered that plaintifT have judgment for taxes on the original assessment. with costs.
 Belinda Corona Mason vs. Charles c. Mason. This case was continued for the term, the parties expressly agreeing that the motion herein for alimony and coun- sel fees, will not he called or acted upon before the trial; and that the said motion and the trial of the cause be heard togeth- Ter and at the same time.
 H. Barnes vs. H. Ellis and others, On motion Of the plaintiff this cause was dis missed.
 John Simon vs. Dolores Simon. On mo- 'tion of plaintiffs counsel ordered that John D. Walker be appointed to take testimony in this case.
 Dora Miller vs. Ferris T. Miller. On motion of plaintiffs counsel ordered that John D. Walker be appointed to take testimony m this case.
 Austin and Dempsey vs. Milton Ward Ordered that decree be entered of record.
 Solomon Shultz vs. Solomon Mund On motion of plaintiff, the defendant consent ing, ordered that thls cause be dismissed.
 c. ". Nash vs. P. J. Van Haren In this case the Court filed its findings Of facts and conclusions of law, and ordered that decree in favor of plaintiff be entered of record.
 F. Beeler vs. B. ". Connolly. On mo- ton ofplaIntifr' attorney ordered that this cause be placed on the calendar.
 John Simon vs. Dolores simon. This cause was tried before the Court and judgment and decree entered in favor of plaintiff as prayed for in complaint.
 Ottea and Loss vs. Brady, Jacobs and others. The court filed its findings of facts and conclusions of law, and ordered judg ment in accordance herewith. On mo- ton of plaintiffs counsel ordered that a stay of proceedings be granted until the further order of the Court or Judge.
 On application, and good cause shown, Louis Gottheimer was admitted to be- come a citizen of the United States.
 Court adjourned till Monday, December 10, 1877.