The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-06-01

parts thereof may be strictly
infant under the circumstances disclosed. Ho may
furnish her with $780, and hereafter, when bils
have been necessarily incurred or moneys 20 ali:
amount are actually needed. he may move the Court
Tor leave 10 apply . further like sum- This should 90
exposed In the order aud the authority limited accord
ingiy
Gano vs. McCunn 81 ALL cannot perceive upon
what these motions were made with any nope Of sue
substtutons ana 10 give up the papers without being
paid or offered penny for their services, ana Without
even security being suggested On the contrary sne
applicant pleads poverty and inability 10 do anything
Tor their attorneys Under SUCH circumstances !
seek remove them because she IS dissatisfied and
prefers other COUNSEL indicates desire 70 secure ne
ends al the expense aud with total disregard OF
the rights Others Ii would be idle these papers
TO make ANY conditional order or TO direct reier-
to ascertain proper sum- which can neitner DC
paid nor received and which Is not the subject Of any
offer. This motion should simply 10 denied, Win
costs.
kulter vs. Boyd.-hr. Fleming Is mistaken Ia sup
posing that he can put an end 10 the examination Wy
denying under oath the detendants ownership OF the
goods IN question II he had 80 ce.s'nea .mo
plaintiff would still have Doen entitled 10 an exam.
NATION or proof OF the lastly o. !hs Ana
such an order The argument that II the alsc ccr-
u6cae be sustained by ialsc oath then the examna.
ton proceed urthcr and tho only remedy u "
ndic ment. this currect view Of the statute.
espec, ally Mr.. Fleming PAGES his denai upon
construction OF letters documents no must pro.
aucc the papers and let them speak for themselves
Hc WAS also guilty oil contempt IN refusing to answer
line Of questions which must DO permLteu 10 can
within tho discretion oi the referee. He must pro-
duce the papers and attachment must issue unless
he pay $40 OF this motion and answer the qucs.
tons propounded and such others as the referee may
deem proper
Erkeuirack vs. Erkculrack. direct proceeding
alnony was Denied aud there has been no change oil
except that the defendant appears 70 oe
in the enjoyment OF moderate prosperity. me app.
cation sufficient 10 uciray Inc expenses Of
the trial stands upon different footing. The charges
arc denied, dcicnaant IS entitled TO the means
OF adequately defending himself. The motion ior all
mony is therefore denied, but an allowance OF Sou
winch, under tho circumstances, IS mooera'cl ID
to deiray The fees oil the couDsei anu Inc us
bursements attending the trial OF the issues
COMMON PLEAs-CHAMDERs.
BY Judge J. +. DAILY.
Connolly w. Conover-MOtions granted.
Price va. Ciark.-Drait decree Tor counsel.
Matter OF Rau.-Motion granted. See opinion.
Wilson VS. Inue-Motion denied; NO COSTS
Welsh W. SUISSE -M0tIon denied, with leave TO re-
.
Casper va Saylea-Motion for extra allowance
granted.
Motion granite without costs.
Hernandez VS.. StilwelL-Uemurrcr sustained. Leave
to renew.
Tauscb w. Esslinger. Motion denied with leave 10
renew on payment OF $40 costs.
Moses VS.. Steinder.-hotion 70 vacate attachments
denied, with $40 costs
Same vs.. Same.-Motien 10 vacate Injunction denied
with $40 costs. -
Hail vs. wrighL-Moson denied with $40 costs to
ABIDE The event
Sackctt vs. Murtaugn.-Counscl will attend on Juno
], ut ten A. 81, ut Chambers
Hassung vs. Kern.-Motion TO set ASIDE order LOT
examination granted.
MorrcllO vs.. Characterization for discharge Of
arrest denied and bail reduced to $500. No COSTS