, 1877-10-11

&Ksa Ts nam "here .t. II ~a' <+s s.,..,.
me 1nry 'hen retmea. anu Sa.psntea t'n. o'osr si
stssei STAT i th.t be % va. befofe he of.n ary ~ss
eungsnaea' was sTnrn; w. H. nn. th watnsa lnn s
T hi,n y Pccniinst - .hnt thn hnk
an' ss s ns''x s,o, sGs nj to' bo + ba,m.-tat
fs W not eo o1sk dn.r ~ 5ae s.s nG1i H. ,onR
t"s+tfri,s sr,I 10 ..ij h. shn,,Ii ia nrotertrI.
In crnss,tcpaminstiou Ss III, witness cont rccol
,,et 1ha,h,.~ - .~nt.jnsd oh,,,t ths sr,nrtaoe.
;cct ~ f,ana ,s hs rst dsv H. dens th@
ho i"d eh.cntc htn.eif A. H. timr ti,e CnH-
nj an ;.cs rsro eale Kano CoDty @ o
ee WA East at ~ ttme' ffe f,ai, teen 4 witness
in t1ess ss;ss; .a;; ,r tn n,rr.t. III. .,m.
f.efs tf'at 70, msrratr before tho urnnl Jury
n tc eTen} nf H. di.mtsshI Of hi. Indictment.
~ ~ IL Ho vo,, ref,,.e ~ 10 dn xnt
"" :iiI ,i'sn g,vs ,o wv a. @ aps1sr '' ~ " 'o
stntnts. ntfccrcr H1tls vonl,ln,t aav whether
thev wantc;i him 9r M
Mr. sinIth Objected 10 lie question, aud a.
the xtncss' cn,;nsel stated that he declined 10
c,ltIou eo,,id layc lin a. q witness rpop d.
n rrsronse ~ = nnrsttni,. 1,nrnrn3ey s,,,t hn
,ijntt ismr,nhrr tl1at any brand .Iu1or II tis
BIrch tolI lin. 20. DiTrh asked him Il ho hai
liz hoolt' Nh Nn ma ha.i aste,l lin abont Il nrs.
vious to Nr. Nrrh nv
r. ar storrsNf ha,ac,1 thu nr3ufoat hoot, IN
II rortaIne,i ~ ~" "
rxrz,rsxana mr. ME-
from time tn lin" wills / va in Forsvthe,s
store. ~
Mr Storrs-r.11 In she t,,rv nn,1 rc .sft, MT
Nfr. CoTnrntcr m ti,c stsnd.
Mr. Smith-iinl,l on.
Then thar wcre I,rief consultations amonr
TUG attorneys On both sides.
Va wiIj Iy po nt, ON wi, % lie atr'tnents Sa''"st
s.r. Nccf cnnttnmed hfs o,,ntntinns. and whcn
he Ind tSnIshctt rea.llpr. '' ~@'1 ""|A
II: M s@ii5 M eaye iose Is. oi tns ea.es where.
N S sca, aerfea o % Ss.s s
sai,i. rt.dll}shcti i'm nrincinlc tI,at T3,rm-
nentarr Confessions rstooI on n:ccselv
tho same ground % oral admissions,
l1c romnciiet, ff, In a witneea arnin.s h,mscif.
Whera n man waa hro,trt,h h. ffrc Csran,] .Tmrv
ami cxaninrJ concerninr lie subject Of tnouIry
under ,i Tie proccss Of lie Court. no Court wouli
aeanst lin II n ea.a be- Tere IN
iictcJ for ,hc rcrv s,shicSt nnstter ,,ndtr nres,
tlgation. ] d. @A' wy ''''~' '''~''~' "'4'' '''-
Mr. Siorrs said there was no branch OF tho
dectsjons than In thai of confessions. TIC ,ncre
fass ti,.t a ,nsn was subnxrnnrtI i,cfnrr a frnnG
jury or apy other tribunal. thus rendering Ills
ntt;nnncc t,,rnn1,lsory. did not f,, thc sljghtcst
t4errrN D{1eIt ttH hHmff9jh5ljtF Hf EfAin-
ments or ex,nfessfons Which thc witness nleht
ihcrc have rnatlc. II was not Al, auswer 10 m
! annliration nIaJc to Introduce he confcss!ons
f,Int wrrc delivered undcr oath. It WA not
nj, arswer tint Tic statetu ents vera uac bcforc
a. m,Jic,al Or - ouasEiudlciaI body. It vss moi
a.; onswc,. in many cnses. that Tia -'''
"A WITNESS prrAlLIxg ritE STATEMENT
voe mt ra,lttonci. The rasrs refcrrctl Ia bv
H. s,nt.h haIi rcfcreuce so far a. rejatet1 tn liz
co,,stitutional Hit OF q porty to % be- protected
frrrn rr,tninntjnr hjmse1f. hit haif M enrt nf
analogy or anncstton to t1s case: W nor T Ind nd the
cases about Tic production of books and
TX hps' hooLs md nanc1. hnvinp hem ,s nrns
.,nred fyo]untarijy for tho purooses
| ri lin aro1,mrnt1. mipbt thay he uscd NJ ~.
Ieneo d. asp arai,st tho pafty who proanced theml
Confessions wero excluded only on a SOLITARY
rronnf, Whcrc thrv were mniie i,r nrnmisc:
e. as ti,e resuit of tIreats. cnurts fsd ercintlc
tl,em. hrrn,.sc h hafj hcrn nrrsurned thot. hav
Inn hcen thus matjn. lid cnmfrsstons were IN.
tn1thfui. Thc nt,iry of tia inv was MT In nre.
vcnt n man m trjai from frnnklv stating that In
| wn. r,,lLv nf The niTenss With wffch hc
VIM charged. no uatter how urcently hIs coun.
! .r.i, o.rnn& srh, .,c1to. ~ srn