New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1877-04-02
CIVIL MOVIES.

william C. Jarrett the fugitive lawyer, was dis
barred b the General Term Of the supreme Court on ur
Judge Lawrence in Supreme Court Chambers. on
Saturday on consent al parties to the Suits authorized
Jcwra receiver OF the Erie ai%aJ, to nH l
London Banking Association limlted.j
Kaufman Simon was charged by JudsOn :. Worth
with inducing Kennedy to the service of sam
%on Which h,G PG1 g%n ooG s 4a Srm ON rddy
fo.nd there evidence whatever against hi anu DIS
missed The proceeding
The Grnc-al Term of the Supreme Court on Satur
das denied s application FOR the release from Ludlow street
Jail o. Valentine Gleason and Andrew L. Roberts Thee
men az il alleged formerly belonged 70 Spence Pct.i,S
gong Of bond forgrs imprisoned on executions
issued AGAINST their persons in civil suits growing ou' " inc
great forccrirs Of 1878.
The Supreme Court, General Term, on Saturday,
in appeal by crtoan from the decision OF the Tax ON
msoners to tax portion Of the lands Of St Johns College
AT Fordhan has ovrrnlrd the decision II The commissioners
The college Of land not used for any p' of
income free from tx II iucrdrd IN one 'l on
- a. rr- oi which buildings Tic sn me Court
M coffee grounds mas not hanged the light exemption Of
In 1876 law for the relief of taxpayers was
passed authorizing them taxes in arrears with lawn
interest to thc Controller Mrs Ellen NJ Doubl'days prop
cy recently sold for tayes After ,hn ale enc lender
the am'un, Oh ihr YAK an ~ % ,,, n,. IN c,,ui him
it, The maianms was Icinse and on 'tnr,ay
The General Term affirmed the refusal Jude
when there has sale. The purchaser ha ticn
acquired rights AL t1e clerk o. ar'Gal' Is s it, to
TIE nc paul VIA lIt'i''' anu F''''|N
allowed by law.
In the Supreme Court, Special Term, Judge Van
WORT the suit Of James A. Sean1n receiver
AGAINST lam T. Wall Abbe VI. WALL in favor 81 MI
Wall. The defendants married in 1851 and accumulated
little money in the with his money stand
ing in the nsmc they bought house and lot but ,ie
husband being very hc decd taken Ia the WlItS
name In 1878 the husband separated from Els VIE am 80 ~
deed to Mrs. Wall on thc ground 90
holds that there was no tf?id on
creditors. He therefore dsmi,srs 10" complaint g. " d.
Iantan appear foT panuh; Dennis Qninn for Mrs Wall
The Supreme Court. General Term, Oh Saturday,
in the suit u Noyes against tho Chdren's Aid
Society decided Surrogate has to mako IN
allowance estate Ia defeated party To suit The
1uestion arises dispute the s Of Mary Hear
s.y Tho viii offered for probate by the plant lei the Hulk
her the plaintiff An carrier vi" gave heuSis
To The ndant other spiei TT" defendant
therefore Will When ihc end ~ the nro
ce,dag surrogate admitted the viii offered - the lam
vel IA 10 her coii sl pai Of the IS ate This ne
giving te opinion SAY hc hat no Eht 10
do.
Charles \. Harrington sucd the city fer balance
due him for sand and br,fon and rran son" wltch he
claimed furnished under contract with The Deck De
psrnent The original contract for 10000 verbs Of
stone bu. the planiin actually supplied very
ha1 I! az named VA the contact The de
recovered Tor under The rpulic
The plaintiff 6ht.nst u Judgment and the city appealed
Brady. giving he opinion 81 the General Term lbs
when goods have been actually
usJ by me city, the les" have mol the
s''Uctd argued ior by the cya counsel Judgment
| affirmed