The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1877-05-10
Baldwin vs.. Moiloy. judgment ordered
Madgc VS. Pring This Is unnecessary: denied.


Baldwin vs. Nolloy. Judgment ordered
Madgc IS. Pring This is unnecessary; denied.
Matter or Vaughan -Guardan appointed.
Ruckcr 81. Rucker-Comm'ssions granted 10 Balt-
more and Richmond.
kucSer Ruckcr--issues settled and order granted
thereon.
Stow VS.. Northrup.-Molion the part OF Nor,hrup
TO change place OF trial denied, wnn $40 costs.
Briggs vs. shaw.--Tbe right 10 tins injunction Is
certainly doubtful. and SHOULD not be granted with
ont giving the defendants an opportunity .. tc.ag
heard The plalnlin may move lor such injunction
II 50 advised, but no temporary restraint Will "
Connell va Ttus-The complain. Is no, properly
verified under section 500 Coac OF Remedial Justicc
aud the affidavit does not coCle within scctIon 49,
same ACT
Emigrani Insurance Savings Bank IS Tniy.-Gcis
should have been examined himself end II should ap-
pear by proof Just TO have this mortgage In
ierrcd back Tor fuller and more complete proof
Ridgway W.. Murphy do not think that this Is .
case costs. There should DO Judgment In accord
ance with the referees report with disbursements bus
Branch W. Sloan.-The pleading Is not verified US
required by the code OF remedial justice, the am
davit sufficient to authorize an ORDER o. publication
Prou,y VS.. Swn.--liolicn granted absolutely unless
palnun perfect his appeal and serve his proposed case
within Ave days and proceed with diligence the APP
neal, deposit within like time further sum oi $3.50
indemnify the defendant against interest costs
the appeal und pay $40 costs OF this motion The
defendant may IN any event take an ordcr Tor pay
the security for restitution OF reversal
MuIlin VS. Farrin-In view vi tho Absences OF any
dental rs to the story about robbery, Icamy's afl
davt cannot DO permitted 10 negative that OF the Pc
iitioner Further, Is distinctly charged that ne was
paid $780, aud MS only answer that was but about
$50 IT Is quite evident that when tho petitioner
Jane Mun, demanded tho 5000 I.cany thought he
hsd beeu paid sufficient for he did not pretend ~ tho
that there anything due him. but put the pe
til,oner on by story as 10 hts having been robbed
he give any items OF travelling expenses
other Disbursements nor any other particulars as
10 his alleged services Upon the whole iccl bound
10 hold, npon these afidayis, that icamy has been
fully paid over $295 The petitioner says but $500;
bat giving him the benefit Of any possibility OF mis-
take on tho petitioners part he must be required 10
pay the balance OF $305 In his hands within ten
days or IN attachment must issue As stated upon the
arsumc nt. the motion to Mr. Farm, who has acted
in good Iaib ana with propriey. mus, be dismissed.
BY Judge Donohus.
Greene vs. G rahan Memorandum
Pike W.. Setter Motion denied, without costs.
suPgrME coUn1--spYcIAL TlEM.
ny Judge Van Worst
Real Estate Trust Company W. sullivan.-F'ndings
Excelsior Savings Bank Nauran and others
Findings and decree signed
siewert VS. Halnel and others judgments Tor plain
tn.
Thompson VS.. Thompson -The counsc should hand
up the checks aud receipts roerrod the proposed
innings, or u copy Of the form OF cach class
Grand Rapids Railroad Company VS.. Saunders. Tho
counsel should hand up one Of the bonds, the subject
OF the action.
BY Judge Van Brunt.
Bishop vs. Tallnan. Motion to refer denied.
SUPREME COURT cIRcUlT-PARr !.
BY Judge Donohua.
Livingston w. Cornell.-SsIlled.
.sUPREME NORTHUMBERLAND 2.
By Judge Van Brunt
Snyder and another vs. Lowcry. See memorandum.
SUPERIOR CouRT.-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge sedgwick.
BURNETT VS.. Mayer II am Of the opinion that ms
the action Is ON contract Tor the recovery OF money
ouy, rhc Clerk should ASSESS damages (sec 2A6) and
that judgment should lie taken without application
10 Court lsec u9 the costs before notice oil trial are
$l5 The action should DO discontinued on payment
Of amount due ana $40 costs and disbursements
. by Chef Justice Curtis
JOHNSON Va Richard " aL-Findngs settled and
signed.
BY Judge Sanford.
Evans vs. vose OF aL-Extra allowance OF $3.50
granted To defendant.
Miller w. Miilcr Reference ordered.
Blan W.. Goldsmith.-Let an order DO entered APP
pointing defendant receiver OF the corartnership
sets ON Ming a bond in the penalty or $500.
weslerman w. Remington, Jr.-Undertakng mp.
proved
COMMON PLEAS CHAMBERS.
BY Judge J. F. DAILY.
Conley VIZ Conovcr Motion granted.
The Now York I.ito Insurance Company VS.. Har-
grave Notion granted. with $40 costs.
schlamp VS.. sullivan. -Motion denied, without
COSTS.
Hardy VS.. Hanson--Mo tlon granted, with $40 costs
The Murray Hill Bank VIZ Griicn.-Motion granted
on payment OF s25 costs. together with dsburse-
mcnts.
The Greenwich Savings Bank va McCreary Order
granted.
The Now York Life Insurance Company Vs. McCor-
mack.-Rcferee's report confirmed
jacobs W. Schlecstein. Order granted.
Astor vs.. Lee-Order granted.
by Judge van Brunl
Hubbel w. The Judd Linsccd sperm OIL Company
Findings settled.
MAXINE CoURr-CHAMBERS.
ny Judge McAdam.
Morris vs. Reynolds Opinion filed.
Fuchs vs. Helmke; Hugemoyer vs.. McIn tosh; Meyer
vs.. stark; Charomell VI. Dick: Altenbrand vs.
DobleE -Motions granted
Heppcrt Tucker; schultz VS.. TuckeE-Ju dg.
ment Tor plaiDtif as per Endorsement upon papers
snyder Va Maginn. -Amendmcnt allowed on terms
indorsod upon pagers and without prejudice pro-
ceedings already had
Lestor VS.. Almey; Holdingsworth vs. Jones' Do
faults.
Pepper VS.. Malahan. Proceedings dismissed.
AttersOu vs.. Kathbun. Execution see aside ana
property taken ordered 10 be returned
Kerr vs. Wyatt.-Henry wehlc appointed receiver
Mork vs.. Leopold Motion to release property
dcnled, but further time given to give new undertak
ing
French VS.. RykoogcL -Proceedings dismissed.
Van Colt VS.. Potc-Mo tion to vacate arrest denied.
but bond on arrest OF e!endant approved