, 1877-04-12
Serious Charges Of usury Against
the Chicago Building
Society.
Tho Case Of Shaw versus 8llaw---
A Wife and Not q Wife.
Joseph E. Otis Appointed Receiver Of
the Estate Of Hopper,
Boyle & Co.
New Suits, Divorces, Bankruptcies,
Judgments, Confessions, Etc.

II
1endIn: r,oncy and computing interest was illegal
and usursous, and could not bo nphcld. It was
their practice to compute The Interest In advance
for tho tims tho lean was 10 run, add 1t TO the prn~
cIpal, and disido tho sum into equal amounts,
which were 10 10 paid monthly. 10 that the whole
principal and interest would DO exllnguahcd at the
timu tho principal fell dne. This looked
equitable, but In reality It compelled tho bor.
sowor to pay donbta rate Of Interest Encour-
aged by this decision, foue unfortunate debtors
Of tho Company yesterday dlcd bills agafnat thu
Society and tts farlosum, q. h Brooks, asklnz fot
rel!ef. Peter cC4n,nplnEham he d..s .no app,s.nt
eic!y, giving mites for s. ,,o. 1ue in ave yests.
sde: soSa!';os S:s a. Rs't = H. II ss
was borrowed and trnst- -drud given a. security
on sho ssnas rroportJ. Brooks ,tnads thc alyanee:
ths soeisiy no ioan could BE- nsde but 70 = stock.
noas fS%p'nsa a.s t. h. ss but H.
srks for an injunction 10 prevent this sale. and for
Patrick ind Catherine o'Kecfe complain that
they borrowed $500. and gAvee 4 no!s f1r S1oo
III % tr,.st,deed M g. sn sAs = af snh1LGt y.
of the amount they aet'ially owe,
81, 4lo aa tfnttdeed on Lot 10, nocf y, il slsf.
a1e s Atsn 5 Il Shss9s as ys III II 1s9 1:: gs a. a. ~
usual account and an injunction to prevent safe.
grievances. They borrowed 81, 5oe 5 q ;hs Society
IN 1s!1; sivlpg neto. M fer 81. 5o9 ;esnted ,
sa 1?F H. M 81 nsss sAs' tss
society till wants louse $3.50 mofo Ind thscatens
!se stp, a e bs!a s 81 S. P,0Ri RITZ s ' ssS
aEans. G. Il. I'rocks. and ellcSc That usu,tous n,
imnediately hy tSe Eodeisty. e and rep'iestiens Sy
tho compafnahts, NO that the cahea arc ready for
ttsl .nd m Wy b. heard .ooa, nr moto probably y
suits aud Uaalt = Law fot liz Soeisly.
4 WIFE AND Nut AWlFH.
There Il material for half.a.dozcn novels In tho
d eeiote s Jndse % Mchl1ist:i About is5s yeang
Ient. consent. Afte; ,iv!as ieg'ihef f. few
en6 th f 81, .as s1e d
few yenrs she became aequs!n,sd with rets1 Shaw,
seths9 a ~ sers 1sa hapu, II ' and .hs b .Fain: hin
tss1ivores on The ground Of cruelty: iio found a
Set s.s hasoand aoS ea cros. Il 6 hsr sat
a.klng tos divotss o2 RE ground of bss%1 The
sss'' ss ;os: thsSsnA e. e. 5sss ssss a's c
sossa s ss ts
asn S 'as eaass Co., VI Ws s IT,
teeu,o hsvins hanisd up ti,s @ iac aooal his step
mother. sworo out = warrant for her arrest On =
liz esse - VII Called Tor .rtni, hsaavS1 no attsmpt
whatever was made to snbstantia.e tho charge, aIl
Mrs: Shaw was Of discharged. She then began
and 1t called for TRIAL yesterday Afternoou. Mr.
Ner.sy.. tho asto,ney for Mrs. shaw. occupied
ssEanent: TIs eaas vii b eoatuad to. asy. % 1t:
lctets J. Heeclscf 'of Public LAMBS IN Arizona.
sn IT, .s. !: mnscd s'ts I'D Mr. shawa Superintendent Of
AZ sne case 70 ct l. Dasla e r. Kundol r. Elijah 8.
sas he hos ceS1 e ns
s9Iss &C., s''sGa %t oil.
fscts. ciatsels, and estate, real anu persoua, Or
tho nrm Of Hopper, IIoyle > Co., Of which
s9GPl9!n.ns VA: member. and Of ~ successor,
dsF and latter arc 10 deliver over 70 the Receiver
III property Of tho two above. mentioned nrms IN
y my bo necessary before Master IN y casncesy.
ihs Receiver 10 10 collect Asl the assots Of tho
1tpat, nn sssn donsa 'nsa 1aa n IN; r. neg b. and
Judgss Dsummona and n!oagsst viii to-day heat:
Arguments IN TUG ense Of tho CoaRecticut Mutual
and other cusea, on thu power Of forogu corpora
MoM. TO iako mortgages Of hold real estate iakcn
Judge Gary, after. completing the cali Of h!a
present calendar, viii hsslst Judge Jameson. Now
'saas'' 1aass wsass VII g f. r. assa oo
mnn.lAw dockc. diminishing ali causes wherein the
parties have not shown dus diligence in prose-
wJgHnSs Moore sssatsa divorce yesterday 70 Eliae
.ss zss neySo e. a. en
Mueller, cause dGAeftion anu adultery.