The New York herald., 1876-02-09
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coUET-cHAMBERs.


Livingston Warburn.-Granted.
Ranny Fischer-order granted
Easton Crowley.-GraDtedL
Duncan VS. Logan.-Granted.
Mason Marks-Grantcd.
Peoples Bank vs. Hofman.-Granted
Reed Brode.-Granted
United states Tea Co. Menager. r.-Explanation re
quired.
warigel vs. Stein and Seinhart Lillestin.-The am
davts Of regularity required in these
Guyon Brown-Granted.
Burshell VS.. Fak (No. D.-Grantcd.
Becerra VS.. Sturges. Granted.
Mclulan VS.. Cow.-Granted.
O'Connor VS.. 0'Connor.-Granted.
Landaas Mcleod. .-Granted.
Germania Fire Insurance Company VS.. Beach
Granted
In the matter of NJ. Legundie- e-Order granted
Chittenden VS.. Otard-Order granted.
Tully VS. Tully.-Granted
Antes VS.. Buodcnsick. ck.-Granted.
Gan Lynch.-Granted.
Law Grass.-Granted
Simons VS.. Jacobs.-tiranted.
Ninth National Bank VS.. Johnson.-Granted.
Odell VS. Harrison.-Granted
Strel VS.. MaxwelL-Granted.
Produce Bank Phillips ct aL-Granted.
Blandy VS. Gould-Granted
Schnerter Rosenberg g.-Granted
Faulsck VS. Kammerer Granted
The Cornwcll Brown Stone Quarry Company VS.. Nc
Reynolds.-Granted.
Lester VS. Lcvy.-ordcr granted denying motion.
Benjamin Bradbury Bros mo. 2l-Granted
Same VS. Same (No. 3)-Granted
Art Doran.-Grantcd.
Security Bank 0lit-Grancd
Firm Mikham -Graned
Giles Ges.-Report Of referee confirmed and
OF child
Kormann VS.. Falk (No. D.-Grantcd.
Same Same tNo. 2l-Granted
Bulls Head Bank The Jaeger Iron Company
Granted
Baldwin VS. The Mayor &c-Grautcd
Louden Tho Mayor, &c.--Granted.
Weeks Satterlee.-Moton denied, without COSTS
and ordered be tried under order heretofore made at
Circuit
Schwarzler VS. Burchell Granted.
Muller GOodyear.--Order granted
Solomon vs.. VOkenng-G
Dean vs. 0r Fri
day February is. 1876.
Ebingcr vs. schappert-Moton granted and cause
referred to William b. Nassau.
Raynor VS.. Stewart.-Granted.
Ekcnbury Can.-Granted.
Dc Forest vs. De Forcst.-The date left blank In the
order of DE Forest Blant must be supplied and tho
affidavit must be verified
Jackson vs. Johnson.-An allowance Of $3.50 Is
Livingston vs.. Gnow-The answer in this case does
seem to be clearly had.
Wiswall Norton.-Thc afndavts do not TO
that this decided favor Of the plaintiff
defendant
President ana Directors of the Bank OF Louisiana VS.
Brander Order granted.
Powers Smith-Granted.
Sherry Crous -Granted
Swift VS.. Scholle.--Granted
Van Schaick Farley.-The affidavit OF regularity
does not state that OF the defendants nfaDts
Filken VS. Far1cid-Motion granted and cause
placed on short calendar for February 49, 1876.
Gordon VS.. Bclt-Explanatop is required in this
Mackcllar VS. Moore.-Grantco.
Raynor VS. Ketcham.-Grantcu.
Wood vs. MitchelL-Grantcd
Mahon vs. Schoe.-Granted
Solomon VS. volkening g-Granted
Max Corner. --G Granted.
Mann VS. WIoughby y-Wbere is the report OF sale
which IL Is sought to have confirmed?
Wairous Fernbscher ct al.--Granted in default
Referred TO Mr.. A. lie Witt Baldwin
Dodge vs.. Mayer, &C. (No. lL-Grantcd
Same same (No. 2j.-Granted.
Casncll vs. Hammond. Motion granted and cause set
down for February Is, 1875
strepul VS. otard.--Granted.
Morton VS. Matthcws.--iranied.
New York Lithographing and Engraving Co. VS.
Viele-Motion 10 place Special Circuit
Calendar granted, aud case set down for Friday
Won SCREENING VS. Kins.-The anldavt Of service is
not verified before either notary commissioner,
before any officer authorized TO administer oaths
Oberland Spcics and Anothcr--MotIon granted
Edward II. Shell appointed receiver. Bond, 81 500
Brown sequard VS. Biaker.-Moiion is granted with
Buhler vs. Havens-Gfanted
Burchcl VS. Falk no. 2)-Granted
Baldwin VS. Smidt t-Grantcd
Levy Is. Boda-Granted.
Taylor Giespie.-Grantcd-
Brown vs. Martling.-Granted.
Wiedmann VS.. KemenL-Granted.
Baker VS.. Merchants and Traders Insurance Com
pany. .--Granted-
The Dcutschc vcrcins Bank OF Frankfort or. the
Main vs.. Meycr-Granted
Manhattan Life Insurance Company vs. Browning -
Granted
same VS. Same Granted
Bresn VS. The Brewers and Masters Insurance
pany.--Grantcd.
Morrison and Others vs. Thornal Granted
Williams VS.. Williams-Grantcd
by Judge George c. Barrett
Pcllcheau VS. Equitable Life Assurance Socicty.-I
satisfied from all rhc facts before me- that Is not a
legitimate proceeding TO pcrpctuate testimony but
rather an effort 10 discover facts. In legal sense
therefore Is not IN good faith The motion 10 vacato
must DO granted, with $40 costs.
Perkins Patterson ana Another The laws of 1875
chapter l6 (pagc ~, provides the mode OF efecting
discharge OF the stay pr proceedings The party is
now entitled TO examination OF the suretcs in the
manner therein specified and IL only after such an
discharge canb be
effected otherwise the amendment without force as
the order asked for tho practice untlfhis
amendment Proof by AFFIDAVIT cannot be substituted
for tho statutory examination even to effect discharge
OF the stay
The Jefferson Insurance Company vs. Tyrrell and
others-The plaintiff should have asked Judge Dono.
hue make the pay yment Of his costs, &C. condition
OF stay, or that tho defendants spulate TO admit
them In the Common Pleas suiL But there was