, 1876-02-09
The Bupreme Court Viii Tolerate No
Advertising Divorce Lawyers.
No Consoles Himself by protestationS Of
Innocence;
And the Assertion It Will Not Hurt Bin
Business.
RAkISBEO.

WuAT THE RutnENE COURT HAd TO SET.
TItE TRtnuNE tho othar lay mentioned tho
fact that Alphonso Goodrich, tho divorce lavyer,
had boon dlabarrcd by The Supreme Court on
the application OF Commistoo Of tho Bar Asso-
ciasiop. Yesterday tho full .o1t Of tue opinion
WAS reoci7od. Judge Brccse. who wrote tho
opinion, begins by rccap'.rlnttog tho nBdecds
Of The defendant, his entertainments Offering to
secure divorces without publicity, etc., although
10 know 1t could not legally bo done, and thnu
opens tho 1ood-gates Of vrsti.
Tbs wises, and nrts snl contsivnnces to which de-
feutlent has rca0rcl In Ida moat dh4HEtnE cniiBe Ara
not only not denied int jnFled. and In explanation
Of his claim to b SHE 70 procure dsrnrre o. tso
| ass Of ut.,, Territory tlsst Ia ground It Isorrc
This We reanrd - 'e iercst nuhtcrfugs, for ha vi
v.rtsements <fs thofd of swser fesid!aR snd pr*c-
ICus to dstsc distant parties Of the requirements
Of tls laws of s1 State. 1,esaes Tho defendant az
oihsr STATE than tIs. It was ialrc and fraudulent
statement, alld known to be 10 when made.
Again. thaae satersisezaeass. sotns ons or al con
sry tho Idea that by unexplained means tle ue
ths Cty oi Chicago 10 Induce it, ministers 70
I sass % nS Totes ss" .a 9 10 .sr Ss ss.
riA. Of the applicant may 10. whether statutory q
not hc b. ioue practice ot Ms ar's ca ssss1a!isa
Icing tie wiser OH account thereof. uc bhatncIepH
tfrnatry hss nevof e!ore, to onr Knowledge. teeH
md # Should stiv1nauza thclr author with enduring
Itistac and cons,'inciy.
Thess advertisements are not only libel upon tito
not plaee h,s name to them. 1t is not dculed a.
'asf ns T !.v N sr:eis,ts. Sst u ho D%ias saas'
no.. IN 70 doing and seting, use m.
@ s... o II ssou e po 'w ws ;Sn:1s e a.s s5s Y e:
advertisements, nor should they be fapc or Contain
eels ~ ths souets. No honorable lel..tn!ndea 1.w-
Il IL honors, could ntoop 70 low a. this afepdant las
That !c should eMtne1lfsh htB papers contriye1 in
rtis o. .aEr.s, With tho emblem Of juatcs In siasu-
We havs no patience Nth one, who. bearing our
Hense to practice law In Our courts, has shocked
reepccs tho courts in which he practices. Ho an
unworthy member aud must ho dstmued.
9hs ones.so9s M made sy IT, assnasns of Tan. "a Of
IL rsht of tf'.1 BY Jury On tso information, ~ e
Tho morale ii dcfcndant's professional conduct de-
serves special notice. lie makes divorce Bpe-
cistJ How many pessos incur broad land arc wary
70 sczc upon tho sltRhtcss tNdg hnt may offer % lid
thcm IN escaTnn from supposed sea Of tEouble In
fret4ng under imaginary ttIs aud what better de-
vices than those rrsctieed BY this dofendsns could 10
oontEiycd TO incrca1s their d..?niaur sna stiusse
rsable divorce ssses should aceutnuate il our courts,
usad Ap ,y flsipg to lhat onJ. An honorable high.
1ouel lawyHr will a!wBsa aid deserving party seeking
divorce ~ coming strictly within his professional
dn.tts. o Will rsader thu old. not solicit the cusc,
and ho will in Ill tlutl8a regarding It
act tho msn: and rctpcc. not only his
Courta, md discharge tho unpleasant duty Ii all
Epccs honorable attorney and counsellor should
do. Such lawyer will mover he found btlrrnH up
soliciting such aaaoa asgFaoe Tho profession, by
the dissemination Of such = circular or receiIt
In vicw Of our dulY imposed by the statute and OF
&hs dpfcndAnt'a rights guaranteed him by ths Con-
sdtutloN nn1 tile laws. uhahlo To why this
Court has not and should nut have tho power 10 purge
1ise1 Of ali unclsanpeaa which may bs found In tts
ctosters aud Kidding itself VI nny nuisance which may
dcaecrate thetn. .-..,..
Wo ara Astts6ed the defendant has dl.honorcti thu
profession of thu law anl LIS pnRtion Of ita
inlstera and tAt ho ought 10 Dc. and he is frou this
tlmn FORTH ,tIabarFed IIR will bo stricken ftol,
The roll Of attorneys Of tIis Court