New-York tribune., 1876-07-24
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

wtsHINgroN July 23.-The following are the
No. 85C-John Warren SON egt saeriln sh9ok Cci
New.YOrk-lhe plaintiffs licensed brokers IN The Cly
oas upon a commission pail them for tuat service They
have paid Tho taxes imposed by the revenue laws upon
DaaB,s The Government agents nave GoW imposed el0a
collected the taxes chtrgabe by law upon DoAer
s mace 1y ne ans o tfsF y GTh ,S SEE 2sIoF m as m a. % Is
jcc The present acton brought 10 recover DscN s1cn
taxes ny questions would seem 20 De =, Dy 70 tne
Revenue ~ Are ceGed bankers, Who also ~" business
"a f6r rc.sely ae the pansias liable 20 pay upon
made tneir own account as @.l a. "nsR -ie i
secu6ns 30 fnnsn satsiaelory definitions Of ne bas-
iacc o. b.siness where credits opened by tle
10 It- -,1 ,r,, -rk o. order 6T where money ad
vance, on 5ocAs bonds b.on bills o. exchange or oils
or ..ory uots are re-, " Tor discount sale, sh4 be
Te-g! as DsAl ~ nG' ,et @ Ga6osiSs are r,isiySd aa2
pail OF GA checks 70 money isloaned upon security
s. a6 s5 s. broker be whose basinst
l. 70 ne ,ate purchases sales Of stocS exchange buion
.Leg, Ots notes, prom ssoty notes on o,er secure
i ,l l ne 0s Whose baslns.s il IS Tdas 4 b
vbci hr desires 10 invest and purchase. United
States sUt2 te STOCK, any othvr socdrr' he DOS
aeI S.es stock whcn ne sell raise money
pay debts becsu, hs - not satisfied VIZ sA pr cent
Interest, Is he thereby made grVGsr' i n lt s ong
wa HaAin -alts AMI Rnrg's.s - ] nj oseSs 5 ya rs
o W ua. ag business Oily. OF security received by him
for g. f.gyusut .iiGare loan ~ou. make him bro
.r aia -u-e.t tIe Ihs would not De deemed az
b. .ig'ss VI aW. hs business the statute lopeg
ars aI such acts "httlr ID me name Oi hiAsrHoiC Ci
ln q. lie tlrpisl excellent reasons for .e aG"p
tuuo provision The tuieAt OF toAeF,ss 20 s1ttt 20
a,a. Il leo made by .h)ssenga 81 IA the busArs0
ttIr ng The cOaci siOl tat me ga Has .IOpsfy
Ily., ALlnel. Sir. Juyo Hunt dtii.eIt. thv olnon'
~ CVtOu As,suoe o. t.Ie Great N strfu inslI.
49, a.. .- t-c i. an..r' for til' ijisi5irI o low
itr ri.au % tie Great "e-era Insurance
Company, OtHGrupt torrOi4l Ia l-i"s, Droushl hs
ACTON t.il~t t.c defendant alleging ta ne was st'rA.
u.r Only been pll upon s.ucA, ui -ns as" ne
nr HkIu.trF ~ the Company AMI seeking 10 recover me
=.,.' remaining unp.t jhr COMPLIANT aver tAat 'he
G t, '. verbally a-rot ID ooc'v s-'h sItA '"ei aAd
Wiz 'liea. 90 become Sdcu i4 accept '- atAe "i 70
aaf.. "..I.N lac pettnt J'-sd ID pe '"e LII an2'I.
if. 'f..H .s iat i4e Subscription W. o3..hrd uy Ae
f.frr rrf.s atI-ols o. tht ag.ut o 'Hr company, .
tr t-- la t, defendant Nod 0Aiy D. rc,0lsJc 10y 20
i.r cen, " Pc. -iUrelpi'h iio oy hiH tht a'i"a" A9
DN. l- urJms-uly note for thr 20 pei cont a a.cUirl
tac s.. ur nori.sgo o rei estate aud tai therculon
-4 sub ruyV"I contract was s"TIrndrI1 ana ciEted up
Iu.fl "taat said uolc Wb ul. "a! llts
a.. i-.,. 81. oJi cations 4ho personal Liabilities 81 al
mis- by reason " s contra. So hla4c aud ibs
m, frU anon! i 30 defendant aytrs ttat Ac I'd
....i.y tIT sock condition ucuilonrA; tI. stcr
10 ..N. -'" ".'Jl, .'Jl 80 80 ~ .~'.,y a. =, I', f.s hS
lYrt,.o vl.I va, rec ed > o'tion ID lEi c,-lsiso
5.i Ia o. Che .lo.It due % rs Sll sutS' .'l IL
u. co.. .,..g tho amount u "lupad subscribed
oaptu st..h for whica Tho srbsc' 5ofs we're a--4e'
on tl' '.. ae court nora tai tAr UNPAID o4,c OF s.oA'
We'll amount paid in Coa.,i,utci tae .aHdur te pay
a Dol, y of lsc ,uIi.act.r oi slars
y'r- 'Ct t ao-cT sbe Q. .Aa res cn,i iy % snare
s4ol. a .s socI Ss, 4n.tl"il tlat "s sapg i-is.
-- tp te iei; ,,e.. %. tht G'gt az .for ,-at
Ai s.r.Iyr u..-..i G,tec
AMI Justices dlicr alld 4rA,Dts li,st .tias