The Cincinnati daily star. [volume] ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) 1875-1880, 1876-04-01

A DMINIsTRATOR'S SALE.--In pursuance
IN OF an order of the Probate Court OF Ham,
ilton County, Ohio, will offer for sale, at pub
lie auction. on L kIDAYs the 2Sth day OF April,
A. u. 1876. at 2 O'Clock z. M, upon the premi-,
ses, the following described real estate, situ-l
ate in the County Of Hamilton and state OF
Ohio to wit: ssAll that certain tract Of landa
with the improvements thereon, situate IN the,
City Of CINCINNATI, County Of Hamilton ana
State of Ohio, commencing at point on thel
south side OF Wade (formerfy Hickory street,a
seventy feet west of Linn street: thence s0uth-i
wardiy parallel with Linn street forty -0nol
feet and six inches (41 feet inehes) to south-1
west cornerof a lot now owned by above named,
Naeher; thence west parallel with Wadel
street fifteen 15) feet; thence northwardlyi
parallel with Linn street forty lone feet and
six inches III feet inches) to Wade street.l
thence east along the south line OF Wad street,
fifteen 81 feet to the place iof beginning, ands
being the same premises conveyed to the satdi
Frederick Naeher by John FL. VIM. Hoeltgel
| and wife by deed recorded in Book No. 1861
page l09 Of the Records Of Hamilton County,
4 Ohio.n Appraised at VI, 200.
Terms OF Sale--One- half cash in hand, and
One-half in one wear from day OF sale, with in
terest; the payment to be secured by mortgageA
| upon the premises sold.
JACOB PRYOR, Administrater u
| of August Boas. deceased. q
| A. j. JEssUP, Attorney for Administrator.
| Cincinnati, March "A. A. d. 1915. mh25-4t, ,S
r EGAL.-superior Court Of Cincinnati, Ohio /
Ia No. 32.440-Cathefine M. Cook against1
band; Francis B. Williams and Mary b. Will-S
Jams, his wife; George {. Williams and ---
Williams his wife; Josephine Williams, Sarah /,
Heath, Andrew Heath, her husband; Mary
Covalt, G. Covalt, her husband; Euretta Swift, 1
and John Swift, her husband; David w. Sni- !
der, and Eleanor Snider, his wife; Catherlnea
snidcr, and David Z. Rusk, her guar-s
dian; William W. Rusk and saliie Ii
Rusk, his wife; Lewis II. Rusk and Jenniet
kusk, his wife; George Rusk and - Rusk,l
David l.. Rusk individually; Osceola Elstuns
and Belle Elstun, his VILE: George w. Elstun.6
and Sallie A. EIstun, his wife; John e. Estun
and Julia Elstun, his wife: Rebecca Elstunsss
Rosetta Elstun, Angeline Elstun, Ann Eliza
kistun, Elizabeth Chambers, Cnan1bersj3
her husband; Thomas Q. Ashburn and Maryd
Ashburn, his wife; VIM. w. Ashburn and
Rosanna Ashbr,rn, his wife; Charles Il. ASH
burn and Sarah Ashburn, his wife; Oharlottei
Penn and John D. Penn, her husband; Francis1
L. Lilich, Hester Mary Carter, Rebecca Al
Swift, Samuel swift, her husband: Hermam
Keller, George Mathers, John Boyle, JamesI
Bulger. st
The above named defendants will take notice.
| that on the .3d day of February. 1876, a peti-a
tion was filed against them in the SUPERIOR
| Court Of Cincinnati, Ohio, by the said Cathe-g
| rine nj. Cook and is now pending, whereIni
| SAID Catherine NJ. Cook demands partition OF
! the following real estate, to wit: Lots num7ss
| bered and y on plat OF subdivision madei
| in the partition OF tract OF land in Sectioni
No ?, Township 3, and +. 4; 2, IN the Miamil
Purchase said sald lot lot No. beginning
| IN plc bUuUu ltHt 9Ol til6 0tcEfDui
at the, distance Of 26-1O0 chains east
wardly from the section corner, thence north1
| X deg east chains to q corner, thence soutfs
S6 Is deg. east 426-1O0 chains to corner, SOUTH
| h deg west 8 chains to the south section line,3
| and thence with the same north 8614 deg. west
26- 100 chains to the place of beginning, conf
| taining 4-100 acres. Lot No. 8, beginning at
the southwest corner OF lot No. s, north e6i<l
deg. west 5 chains to a corner, thence north ri
| deg. east IA 52-l00 chains to the north line
| Of the tract, thence south 62K degs5
east l6 s9-lOO chains to a corner.
thence south n deg. west rs chains to-
the place OF beginning, containing 10,
44-106 acres, more or less, and being two
Of the lots which, among others, werel
set off to Euretta Gipin IN proceedings In par-S
tition in case of Francis b. Williams VS.. Geo.
i, Williams ct al. in the Supreme Court OF
Ohio at Its May Term, 1Sf1, which proceedings
are recorded in volume 70, page 354 Of the Rec-i
ords of the Supreme Court Of OHIO, in Hamiitoni
County, Ohio" and that at the next term Of
said Court the said Catherine NJ. Cook VIII ap-1
ply for an order that partition may be made Of
said premises.
| Dated this Tth day Of March, 1876.
JoRDoN, JORDAN & WILLIAMS,
mill -6tS Attorneys for plaintiffs.