Evening star., 1876-12-07

lNTIMIDATING NoN-CNION MEN-The
case of Charles Sternack against John r
Brooks was tried before Judge Robinson and
jury IN Part III OF the court of common
pleas yesteriay. The plaintiff was one of the
strlklng taiiOrS who had been employed by
Brooks Brothers He was arrested for intim-
ldating non-union men who sought employ
ment, but was discharged by the police
magistrate before whom his case was brought
he then began an action in the court of com
mon pleas, claiming $1,000 for false impris-
onment. On his cross-eXamination yestar-
day, Sternack said he had been paid 40 Dpr
week by the tailors' union, and that he and
others were employed by the union TO patrol
the streets in the neighborhood of Brooks
Brothers establishment, and 10 prevent
non-union men from going TO work there.
Judge Robinson dismissed the complaint in
the case. and told the union men, OF whom
there were a large number i'm the court room.
that, though they are at liberty TO meet i'm
their lodge room and TO strike for higher
wages, they had no right 10 patrol around
MesSrs. Brooks establishment and prevent
others from taking work. " Y. Times, 6th.
THE BEECHER CASE Thomas
u. Shearman moved yesteriay i'm Supreme
Court. Chambers before Judge Brady for an
allowance, besides the taxable costs i'm the
suit of Francis ID. Moulton against Henry
Ward Beecber, which, after the granting of
the motion for change of place of trial, Mr..
Moulton discontinued. Mr.. Shearman criti-
cised the course of the plaintiff, who had i'm
THIS very action published libelS equal tO
those he claims he was falsely charged with
utterlng, ard he had denounced as block
heads the judges who had decided against
him. All This he had done with impunity
thus far But he (Shearman) did not mean
plaintiff should do so with impunity any
further. He did not mean to Let up on him
Mr.. Pryor said he was not there TO answer
charges OF alleged contempt, though he could
answer Them e1fectually when they came up.
Mr.. Moulton had announced from the first
that he could not 90 i'm the country TO try the
suit, and II the place OF trial were changed
he must perforce discontinue. Under the cir
allowance Chnnl1 he faI
Decision received.-GN y. World, 5h.
Miss BESSIE TURNER'S WHEREABoUrs.
Miss Bessie Turner held a situation at an D.
town restaurant until lately. when her no
toriety in the Beecher tr al caused her such
inconvenience that she gladly accepted an
Invitation from Mrs. =. L. Reese. W &c of
POllce Justice keeSe, of Jersey City, To be-
come her guest. During last summer Miss
L. AYed win her brother, young McDermott,
at Long Branch, but, aftX leaving The
restaurant referred to, he 0kt trace of her
pntil last Saturday, when be saw her AT the
says that she Scolded him Soundly for search
ing her out, whereby he was astonished, be-
cause she seemed TO live very happily with
him last summer and because he had sup
piled her with sufficient money for her wants
until she unaccountably disappered. On THIS
occasion, however, she refused to recognize
him as her brother and ordered him out of
the house. McDermou hints al taindisclo-
sures In this connection.-fN Y. World, 5th'
PRINCE BIssARcK's SENTIMENTS as
given i'm his address on Friday last at the
parliamentary dinner are said to have been
greeted everywhere in Germany with the
greatest satisfaction. AT Vienna opinion is
divided, while In Hungary there is a general
agreement with the views expressed by Bis
marck. In further account of his speech he
Is reported as having said that Germany had
purposely refrained from all interference,
and had no wish TO acquire prestige by med
ding with other peoples affairs. She had re-
fused 10 mediate or advise where she had no
intention of supporting her counsel by force.
The time would come when the disinterested-
less of her policy would be generally recog-
nized, and when European affairs would be
adjusted by the weight which Germany. If
her interest required, was able 10 throw into
the balance.