The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-15

UutuSo Teinanued. Justice Howell cOncurS In
the decree. The Chief Justice and Justice Nor
gan dissent. -
No. No. s9a2-Joseph o. Toups ct al. VS. Edward
paris Of 12ppeanb6Apnea from District Court
cannot be considered. though made within the
Three thI days. ny the case had been submitted on
TO establish the invalidity OF piaintifrs title.
Judgment affirmed. ' ''''o'
M No. 1900. Peter Hand. tutor. etc, vs. DR.. Jas.
Court. parish of Orleans. Judgment affirmed.
No. 6oo1. Succession Of Hampton Elliott
Appeal from Second District Court. parish of
Orleans Judgment amended rejecting claim
OF Winchester Il North and in other respects
No. so25. State Of Louisiana VS.. W. l.. Thomp-
son, appellant. Appeal from Superior Criminal
Court. parish of Orleans Defendant was not
entitled TO challenge Jurors peremptorily. his Of
harg a6o a1t being punishable BY Imprisonment at
viyo no. ,,l 47os n b. Merrill vs. Mary I, Flint. his
Court. parish Of Orleans; Judgment reversed.
Appeal from the Sixth District Court G paryIsh Of
Orleans Judgment affirmed. .u'
lants vs.; city Of Carrollton. Mayor and Conncil
Appeal from District Court parish of Jeffcr-
son. Judgment reversed.
- NO, 1882 II. A. Lucas and wife OF al heirs OF J
f. Shepperd. appellants vs., i. G.. Brooks, ct al,
heirs h,' Of +; d. Shepherd. Appeal from Second
District Court. parish OF Orleans. Judgment
No. 6ii9. T; Higgins VS.. G. G. Haley. Rule dis
charged. The Chief Justice and Justice Morgan
No. 5ils. City of Now Orleans vs. John W. Can
non. appellant. appeal from Superior District
Conrt-Judgnent reversed.
W. No NdS S7l2 g. geo, = Lacey. appeant, VS.. Rufus
Wapies. W. van Norden intervenor :appeal from
Superior District Court, parish Of Orleans
Judgment against plaintiff affirmed and in favor
o. o. ,nterven9r reversed Justices Morgan and
;, No 1895. Commagere 4 Lambert vs.. L. C.
Duran ct al appellants. Judgment affirmed.
appellant-yu Judgment affirmed
haitian Life Insurance Company Judgment
No. 59l4. Philip Avegno VS.. Geo. A. Fosdick.
appellant-Ju affirmed.
no. 6o36. Police Jury Of the parish of Plaque
mines. appellsns. Vs. Z. o. Packard ct als.-Judg
No. 1861. Vim. Barnes Vs. Edw. Thompson. ap
pellant.-On rehearing. former decree main
No. Go93. Consolidated Association OF the Plant
ers of louisiana VS.. E. Chol. appellant-Judg-
No. Gog6. b. Rossgnol vs.. Estate Of D. Triche.
y: Irich1e. Administratrix. appellant. -Judg
No. $3.50. Bayley & Pond vs. Parish of st.
Charles. - Judgment reversed:
, No. ALI. H. g. Jeter vs.. d. B. Penn, appel
lant.-Judgment reduced to s4ss 90, '''fO
General vs. cnao IL Rudor eS re Attorney
clet, Treasurer. Frank Morey, intervenor.-
Judgment reversed,
INo. Ollo, ohut Vi lIOulSIdnu eX roll, HUGO He'll
WITT, vs.. Judge Of the Sixth District Court-Hule
made peremptory.
No. i7l5., L, w Burbank VS.. c. E. slayback. ap-
pellant.-yudgment affirmed.
No. 551O. Succession OF A. Constant Hearing
j Judgment amended
United states Circuit Court.
Present, Hon. W. B. Woods Judge,
This being the day fixed for the case Of the
called. '-.e 'I'Tff{'I "
In the suit q heirs of Hoover vs. York and
Hoover; Albert 6. Ober, intervenor, r. H. MARI
ESQ. att0rney Tor 1ntervenOr, this day filed a
plea and exception, to the Jurisdiction of this
Court, on the ground. chiefly that all matters Of
probate Z, tb iharater IRE exclusively under the
who are Jointly Interested in the matter in issue
are not made parties to this suit and that the de-
cree o. the Supreme Court rendered herein is
Fred, N. Goodrich VS., Logan NJ. Hunton. n.--Or-
diered, that the Injunction issued herein by the
therefore dissolved, and It was further ordered
that the bill Of complainant be dismissed.
N. W. Casey VS. Joseph Baile.-Ths case was !
taken under advsement. = ~"
Henry K Jackson ct al. vs. Vicksburg. Shreve-
port and Texas Railroad OF alt was ordered |
mat the exceptions Shogld be overruled and the
elaimanta who have made proof of bonds which
have been dtsallowed In the report and by this |
conilrmatory order. pay the costs Of their pro-
United States VS.. Harris G. Pearson.-The ae-
,used was arraigned under tho charge OF con
spring to defrand. etc. and plead not guilty
Hls n bondsman Tor the sum of 5000 was Justin
United States vs. +. Dudenhefer,- opened
ind evidence and pleadings went on till near s
,. ni. whcn II was continued until to-day.
Superior Criminal Court.
Present, Hon. H. r. Steele, Judge,
Terrence Mullen charged with assault and i
)attery; Peter krane, charged with embezzle-
nent; J. Kerriean, charged with assault and
,lttery. and an assault with intent to kill Frank
{Oucu and bernard Ban pardeu fbn rf,ad ,ritL
ARRIVING concealed weapons. pleaded not guilty
4ous Sylvester. on the same charge. pleaded
Mary Francis was tried for grand larceny. and
he Jury were out. Frank Paul is now on trial
or the same offense.
First District Court.
Present. Hon. E. Abel. Judge,
L. J. B; Brunett, Charles Eberhart. Taylor Fer
charged with larceny. assault and
artery; ETC.. and piead not guilty.
}. nol!e pIoseaut was entered In the case of the
N!4Ie Va. Edward Chapman. i
The District Attorney filed informatlons
geainst the following parties: Oscar Sal9m0n.
tc.; Sam Wilson,. James Dwyer and Henry I;
,ooper. assault and battery; VIM. .Toney. james
Williams, alias Johnson. and Richard Delmore.
Josephine Redclifle plead guilty Of assault,
larry Cecilia. convicted OF larceny. was sem
enced to one months Imprisonment in the Par
It was ordered that the Jury Commissioners
raw from the Jury box thirty-six additional
arQrs for this month. The summonses are
nade returnable on the 18th instant.
Fourth District Court.
Present. Hon. b. L. Lynch. Judge.
The verdict in the ease of Barremore vs. Me-
'eely was, We, the jury. find for the plaintiff a
erdict for the sum OF $3.50 against the defend
Mt"
Sybil Ze,ler VS.. John Hamcade.-On motion OF
L. Tissot, attorney for the clerk of court, it
Ias ordered that the plaintiff show cause on
riday. the 25th inst, why the bill Of costs
hould not be approved by the court and execIi-
on issue therefor against the plaintiff, with
osts of court. sff al,
Belloca. Noblom h Co. vs. their creditors-
aid rule was dismissed on the ground that the |
rider on Henry Peychaud is unnecessary
Ryrnes y Bros VS.. Harrington & Co,-The
ule taken herein by plaintiff on the garnishee
deliver 70 the Sheriff certain mortgage note, ,
VIM. Rasbury. ot al, VS.. H. P Redmond. ct al ,
he rule taken herein by the succession of VIM.
!arper. to transfer this suit to the United States
district Court. was made absolute.
M.Shelby Il Cows: Llambias & Docktor.--Judg-
lent for the plaintiff for the sum Of 1901 TO-
Francis L. Fernandez VS.. Patrick Glark-Judg-
18th lien and privilege upon so head Of cattle OF
le defendant
Fifth District Court.
Present Hon. E. North Cullom, Judge.
Licien Duclos VS.. Captain Cozzens and steam
r Josephine. The default of the oath Defernher
s75, was confirmed for the sum of &343 65
Ohambury. vs.. Cason ct al. On motion of !
ounsel for the plaintiff, it was ordered that the
aid suit be discontinued at plaintiffs costs
Jhambury VS.. Herwig; all discontinued on :
lea to the jurisdiction of the courf