The Lake County star. [volume] (Chase, Mich.) 1873-current, 1876-01-20
Proceedings Of The Board Of Supervisors.
[OFFICIAL..l
(COnciufCd.)

the motion dao not pfcVaii py aye'
'as,d says, as follows: Ayes, Wood
Alien, Heilmnn, Knight; nays
Baker, Mckee, Miller, Townsend
McCluskey, Randall-6.
On motion that the Co. Clerk re.
ceivs an annual salary of $4,000
the motion prevailed by ayes and
nays, as follows: Ayes, Wood,
Heilman, Baker, Mckee, Miller,
Townsend, McCluskey, Randall-S;
nays, knight.
On motion that the Judge of Pro-
bate receive All annual salary of
$4,000, which melton did not pre-
vail by ayes and nays, as follows:
Ayes, Wood, McCluskey, Town
send, Randall; nays, Allen, Ba-
ker, Mckee, Miller, Knight, Clark
20.
On motion that the Judge of
Probate receive nm annual salary
Of 100000, the motion did not pre- :
vail by ayes and nays, as follows:
Ayes, Wood, Allen, Knights;
nays, Baker, Mckee, Miller, Town
send, McCluskey, Randall, He'll
man..
On motion that the Judge of
Probate receive an annual salary of
$25O.OO, the motion prevailed by
nyes and nays, as follows: Ayes,
Wood, Allen, Baker, Mckee, Miller,
Heilman, Clark, knights.
On motion that the Prosecuting
Attorney receive an annual salary
Of &650.00, the motion did not pre-
vail by ayes and nays, as follows:
Ayes, Wood, Holman, Townsend.
McCluskcy, Randall; nays, Ba-
ker, Mckee, Miller, Clark, Knight
IS.
On motion that the Prosecuting
Attorney receive all annual salary
Of $4,000, the motion prevailed by
ayes and nays, rs follows: Ayes,
Wood, Allen, Baker, Mckee, Mil
Ter, Townsend, McCluskey, Randall,
Heilman-9; nays, Knight.
On motion to reconsider the vote
previously had upon the salary of
the County Treasurer, the same
prevailed by ayes and nays, as fol-
lows: Ayes, Hcilman, Baker, Mil
Ter, Townsend, McCluskey, Ran
dali, Knight; nays, Allen-.l.
On motion that the Co. Trcasur-
err receive an annual salary of
the same prevsiied BY
syes and nays, as follows: Ayes,
Baker, Miller, Townsend,
NfcCluskey, Randall, knight, Nc
Kes-@; nays, Allen, Wood--2.
On motion to reconsider the vote
Isken upon the salary Of Judge of
Probate. pending which, the Board
till one O'Clock p. IN.
One o'clock p. IN.
Board met pursuant to adjourn
nent; called to order by the chair
nan; roll called, members all pres
mt.
The vote was then taken upon
he question Of reconsidering the
'ote previously had upon the sal I
'ry Of Judge Of Probate, with the (
result: Ayes, Randall,
icCluskcy, Heilmsn, Wood, Town
ends; nays, Baker, Allen, Mil {
sr, Knight. a
On motion that the Judge of Pro- $
ate receive an annual salary Of +
10000, payment of which to com |
renee on the 1st day Of JAM, A. I
}. 1875, the motion prevailed by o
yes and nays, as follows: Ayes, il
andall, McCluskoy, Mckee, Town p
nd, Wood, Clark--6; nays, He'll
ian, Baker, Allen, Miller, Knight s.
IS. p
On motion to reconsider the vote
reviously taken in regard to cs- v
the Co. Clerks salary at "
10000, the motion prevailed by q
yes and nays, as follows: Ayes, a
andall, Holman, McCluskcy, y
God, Townsend, Baker. q; nays, p,
lien, knight, 2. \
On motion that the County Clerk q
COVE an annual salary ofS750.OO, "
.ymcnt of which to commence
the FIRST day ofJan., A. ID. 1876, -
e motion prevailed by ayes and Al
Us, as follows: Ayes, Randall,
Gilman, McCluskey, Baksr, Town
nd, Wood, s; nays, Allen, Clark, to
right, z. pa
On motion to reconsider the vote uh
cviou,ly taken in regard to es- A,
the salary of the County ,ocr
easurer at 100000, the motion ala