The New York herald., 1876-11-14
DECISIONS.
s,.rEEME cOURT-cHAMBEaS.
nv Judge Barrett.

DECISIONS.
srrEEME coURT--cHAMBEas-
BY Judge Barrett
Tie Aeass Il National Bank VI. The Rickand National
BanA--uplulou.
The Equitable Life Assurance Society vs. Brown
Hamickle VS. parker.-The testimony shows that
neither Mr. Green the Comptroller 10 indebted 10
him No order can be made requiring the Comptroller
to pay oveE IL is not necessary 10 pass upon any
other question Notion denied, without prejudce 10
creditors bill or 10 = motion for n receiver
Tho Amoskeag Manufacturing Company vs. Garner
Findings or fact and conclusions OF law settled Ro.
quests 10 ind passed upoa. wish It understood that
declining 10 find A. requested do not mean 10 say
that the evidence does no, repeatedly justify findings
which been declined. Tho refusal is frequently
based upon my judgment TO the rrelevancy CT the
request or upon its being request 10 nnd evidence
BY Judge Lawrence
| Gillian va Voorhis Jr, Nos. !, z ., ana .;
Hornby vs. Phillips Earle vs. Mills; Grigg vs. Law
1nerv vs. Dayton; Fabcr vs.. Perkins; Page vs. Page;
Avery vs. Conner, 8c.; The Gcrmsnis Fire Insurance.
surarce Company Va Harway, Nos and 2.-Grantcd
| Hazcl VS.. Marks; Mcintosh va Smith, and Mastleje
The Board OF the church Extension Fund Of the
| Presbyterian Church VS.. Pike et taL-Memorandum
| Vernon VS. Richardson Motion granted.
| Kohn VS. Lcvy, and The Five Points House OF In
| dustry VS.. Amerman. n.-Explanations required.
Barnes vs.. story.-Does this show the defendant is
Robbing VS.. pancan-The taxation OF the clerk is
affirmed, without costs
/ or vs. Diehl--I wish to counsel in regard TO
Mcvey VS. Can.relL Taxation affirmed. Memoran-
| dum
10 come on terms. Soc memorandum for counsel
Stevens Va. Mcdonnell L-Motion to place cause on
Special Circuit calendar for Friday, November -,
Matter Of Barnes, &c--I adhere to the opinion ex-
pressed in the memorandum heretofore hed, and do
not ind any which supports the view Of the
prisoners counsel Let an order be entered tnat the
prisoners DO brought into court ON Wednesday. No
vembcr IS 1875 NJ bapast ten A. H., and cI notice
be given to Mr. Blackwell ol such order
Matter OF Hamilton. This order appears to be cor
In the provision that the power Of attorney
shall not be hied. Tho order should DO amended IN
that particular.
Roomc vs. The Mayor &c.--Moton denied; no costs.
Perkins vs. The Mobile and Ohio Railroad Com
pany.-Tne taxation OF clerk sustained. Aemoran-
DUN
costs Memorandum.
Summcrvillc vs.. Bcrggoist 10 couurm re-
port denied. Memorandum.
Matter OF HoT, Jr--Prisoner discharged. Memo
Babbitt vs. Lewis.-I will hear counsel further II
desired, but win my present understanding Of the
case am not inclined TO grant the application Mem
0randum
Fowler VS.. Trcnor OF aI-Motion denied, without
costs Memorandum
sheridan Hopkins s-Mcmorandum.
GudcLoge VS.. Young.-The bond seems 10 be in the
usual form, and the case tho 18th OF Hin. as l un-
dersand IT, hold that such bond Is irregular
The paintiI is entitled 20 denial Of motion, without
COSTS
Hon VS. Pcntz II am inclined 10 entertain an appli-
cation Tor an examination Memorandum
SUPREME coURr-spEcIAL TERN.
BY Judge Van Worst.
Heynan vs. Bcringcr ct al-Further findings Of fact
| signed
Druns Jr.. vs. Boehm OF al Findings on judgment
| for plaintiff signed
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPEcIAL TERN.
BY Chief Justice Curtia
| Reynolds vs. Crump ct al Motion that defendants
satisfy part Of pian.ns clam denied & with costs OF
| Postley va. DickeL-Motion denied, with $40 costa
BY Judge Speir.
King ct al VS. Buck mastcr.-Moton denied, without
| costs 10 either party
Kelley, sc, va Dusenbury. denied, without
/ Hoideman Paper Company W. Gnes. Order remov-
| ing cause 10 United States Circuit Court
Gloggner Beriin-Order of reference aside and
| cause restored to trial term calendar.
Sanford vs.. Sanford Reierence ordered to Hon. John
| n Barbour.
| Wilder vs. De La Vergne.-F'lndlngs settled ana
Keep M McReynold ct al Demurrer sustained See
Agnew vs.. Keith no u same samc.-Rcfcrences
ordered
thorze the Court 10 grant an order Tor tho arrest OF the
| defendant
The Health Department vs. smith ct al Demurrer
overruled. with COSTS with the usual leave TO answer
| Heyenbcin Hats ct aL-FIndings settled
Kelly Dc La vergns. Findings settled and
COMMON pLEAs--spKcIAL TERN
BY Judge Van Brunt-
Fox vs. ox-The demurrer must be sustained. The
expressly declares that the Court may declare
void the marriage contract when the former husband
wife OF OF the living the time OF
the marriage and tue marriage with such former hus
band wile was therein good.
Whie vs Winlord.-Thc proposed stpulatc must DO
reduced 10 writing and submitted
freedman vs Golland. Motion denied, with $40
J costs.
Iauterbach vs. TabeIe.-Moton granted, $40 costs
! oil motion to respondent 10 abide event OF appeal
M tlnn u hmm enCtQ
| SEQ memorandum
Dreyius VS. Phlps-Motor granted. bill OF particu-
lars TO be furnished In thirty days. $40 costs oi
| uon 10 abide the event.
The German Bank W. Patterson; Kinaldo VS.. Baker. -.
Motions denied.
Seymour VS.. O'Connor.-Motion to consolidate must
be iiado In Supreme Court
Brueckel VS. acknowledgements modified. See
memorandum.
Beilesheim VS.. Rss.--Moton granted, unless de-
fcndant spuiates to Try on first Monday OF December
DAVIS vs. DaviA-Motion having aicnuy
to settle issues this case and made refer
ring 10 Pho Ruggcs, this motion must be denied.
Daiy VS. Bonner Motion denied. without costs.
Werder RosenthaL --Urdcis vacated, without
cost. Sec memorandum.
Solomon vs. Tanenhox Motion granted, with
costs.
| McGranc VS.. Rattcy.-Sec memorandum on nnd-
| ings.
upon amount received will be allowed TO receiver
balance should TO paid TO judgment creditors
Johst VS.. Johst.--DIvorce granted piainun.
COMMON PLEAs-EQUITY TERM.
by Judge Van Brunt.
Guntzer vs. Leaycroft.-Judgmcnt for plaintiff for
$I.U2I IL and interest
Moncref vs SmalIcr--Finding signed.
The Eleventh Ward Bank vs.. koener.--Sce opinion
BaIer VS.. Hausshildt dt-Dccrcc signed.
Lowaen Us. Morran-Moa,on granted with $40
$40 costs vi the motion within ave days.
COMMON PLRAs-GESERAL TERM.
by Judges G. r. DAILY, J. +. Daily and Van Hocscn
Kosenhcld, Jr, VS.. Muller and others Judgment
affirmed with costs. Opinion per cnriam
Zimmerman SchapporL Order reversed, with
$40 costs dis sbursements- Opinion per curiam.
Leonhardt VS.. Beck-Judcmsnt reversed Opinion
per curain.
The People vs. Kurnitzhi Spero; Same VS.. Marks