The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1876-01-06
UNrrrn ETATEs SUPREME COURT.

WASHINGTON, jan D, 1870.
In the United States Supreme Court yesterday tho
following cases argued;-
No lOS Lloyd 4 Lloyd va Fulton, trustce-Appeal
from the Circuit Court for Georgia This was bill to
enjon execution certain judgment recovered by
the appellants On the ground that the property levied
upon was held BY Fulton only for his wife
and children. The question involved whether the
deed OF trust which was made who the debt on which
the action was brought existing void because
fraudulent against previous creditors The claim on
the part Of tho appellee that at the date OF the
conveyance to his wife Fulton worth moro than
enough pay all his Indebtedness and that the deed
was therefore valid The Court below sustained the
instrument and 1t rs here urged that II matters not
tho alleged ability Of the husband 10 pay his debts at
the date OF the deed that II made whilo the
debt outstanding the rule as TO previous creditors
invalidates IT. Phillips for appellants; d. Pope for
appellee.
trict Court Of Connecticut action brought
by the plaintiff In error as assignee OF the Odoress
Rubber Company, against the defendant as subscriber
the subscription, alleged that the hrst install
ment should be paid whenever the cash subscriptions
amounted TO Sis OO0 and the balance in equal install
ments monthly without further conditions The do
fence was that the subscription induced by false
representatives Of the corporation, and that II
20 be paid until the stock Of the company had been re-
duced thirty per cent which had never been done. Il
was averred that the false representation had been
the contract accordingly rcpudated The Court held
that tho reduction which 70 be made a condi-
ton 10 the existence OF the subscription and gave udg
nent for the defendant IL Is here claimed that the
clause as the thirty per cent Is statement or
recital and not condition 70 the attaching Of the obll
CATION. q Perkins for plaintiff in. error A. p.
Hyde for defendant
No 39l. Manhattan Life Insurance Company Of New
York Buck-Error TO the Circuit Court for hissis-
sppi-The question In this cause Is whether the
had the effect 70 suspend dissolve Of nsur
anco made between Northern companies and people OF
the South before It's commencement Tho Court below
hold that II was only suspended during the war and
there was recovery on the policy, although after The
war begun no premiums were paid IL IL here insisted
that the war dissolved the contract and that there
should therefore have been recovery The prnci-
pie In the s the that OF PIsh New York
Life Insurance Company, decided by divided Couri
some two years ago The lower Court IN that case
held that they dissolved and coming 70 this Court
the Judges divided on the question and The judg
ment below consequently stood affirmed Pltman
Ptmann for plaintiff IN error; o. McGregor opposed
No COS Hoover Va Wise ct aL-Error 70 the Court on
Appeals OF New York.-1he question IN ms case h
whether Wiso and others had knowledge thas we
debtor (the bankrupt In giving confession o' Jua6.
ment In their favor acting In view Of insolvency
and with intent 70 give them preference The Court
below held they had not and u Is here maintained tha
on this question Of this Court cannot review the
iudement Submitted on She briefs Latro0e aud
Buref for plaintiff In error W. W. Boyce for deiend.
ants - -. =. -. -.
Court Ear Iesssss"s -rhis waa hil Tn @nf"rce the