New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1876-05-27
regard for Senator Conkling. but nc does not SAY
whether he will vote for Blaine or not:

v..John j. Blair Blaine, and Isaiah W Outs
v..Hmy G. ptney BLAINE, and J. wyman
W.T. Jones Tonslln =; ,,asv r. Van Reps.
VII. r. H. Kendr,ck lCunkling) and NJ. I. Newbod
NEW YORK.
sIxTY-r1yE or THE 20 DELEGATES PROBABLY FOR
CoNKLiNG.
There has been little change in the delegation
since the publication of the former article. The
friends of Mr. Curtis claim men IN the delegation
in favor Of Bristow. The chances for Conkling re-
eeiving the solid vote OF the delegation are no better
than they were when it first chosen. There Is
better prospect for his receiving large majority OF
it, since there has been visible reaction in hn favor
during the past few weeks.
ONO.
A SOLID DELEGATION INSTRUCTED FOR HAYES.
The Convention instructed its delegates TO Use
their best efforts to secure the nomination OF Gov
IIqyes. The second choice OF the deegates IL
thought TO be about equally divided between Blame
and Bristow with PERHAPS few votes for Morton.
OREGON
A SOLID DELEGATION FOR BLAINE.
The Convention instructed its delegates TO vote
for Blaine. They all in lid favor.
PENNSYLVANIA.
THE nEIFGATEs INSTRUCTED FOR HARTRANFT.
unit. and to give Gov. Hartranft an earnest, con
stant and united support. The delegation Is con-
troled by Senator Cameron and was AZ one time
claimed for Blaine. The appointments OF Mr. j.
Donald Cameron 10 be Secretary of War is under
stood 10 be pledge that the entire vote of the dele
CATION will be given to Senator Conklng On the
second ballot. Whether the transfer can DO made
or not is "a subject upon which opinions differ. 1t Is
generally conceded, however, that the bulk OF the
vote will 90 to Conkling, while few votes may 60
to Blaine. ,,,,
MAJORITY REPORTED FOR BRISTOw.
There are conflicting reports about the delegation.
One account says positively that seven are for Bris-
tow and one is for Blaine Another account says
the DELEGATION is divided among several candidates,
aud that no candidate has a majority. IL is pretty
safe TO say that the vote will be divided between
Brstow and Blaine.
SOUTH CAROLINA.
PROBABLE MAJORITY FOR MOTION
The platform approves Senator Mortons public life,
but does not instruct the delegates. He probably has
a majority of the delegates, bis faction was tie
strongest in the Convention. The delegation prob
ably stands Morton, { Blaine 2; Brstow, :;
COnkhns, =. ..,
PLURALITY rOg BHIsTow.
The Convention gave It's delegates no instructions
and expressed no preference i careini canvass I"
the drlegation makes it stand Bristow, 10; Morton,
5; Blaine 4 Conkling, . Tne delegates are;
J. NJ. ThomburSA.
II Large d Da vi IA A. Num-
J. 4 Wilder.
Dist l. X K. Butler and T. II. Reeves.
LIE Z. Camp and Wan. Eale
A. A6 g, - P.,l l" a a. + " '' T. Waters.
v j. A Warbler aud ". y. Elliott
VI H. II. Harrison ana J. IT, Bnrics
A. Hu q. ".
Wills ". Hawkins ami IT, a. Eideecy
IN A Freeman and J. ". Boyd
X..LdWa.G shaw aud Nm. VI. AihSoipA'
TEXAS
Trtr DrrrGATFs CLAIMED III MOTION.
The delegates are uniustructed aud they have
ziven no indication Of their preferences. The Nor
ton men claim the whole Of them and the Blaine men
clam three. ..,
rnr DELEGATION CLAIMED Fo3 DoTH ELAINE All
BRIsrOw.
When the delegates wero drst elected a majority
Of them wer, undoubtedly in favor OF Sir Blaine. II
is claimed by the friends of Nj. Brstow that there
has since been q change in his favor and that be
now has a majority. he most probable estimate d
TO give half 10 each man. ,,
The Democrats hold Their Convention on June j.
VIRGINIA
EIGHTEEN or TIE Tw,SrY-rwo DELEGATES FoE
BLAINE
Tho platform contains q udtiFIlhg II''"ia'"i'"t" w
Mr. blaine and declares hm to be the choice Of The
Convention. RE deie1atr. are thought 10 stand:
Blaine 10; Coukling2; Morton, .
WEST VIRGINIA.
SEVEN or THE Ten DELEGATES FOR BLAINE
The platform praises Secretary Bristow for hlS
warfare against corruption. and declares that MI
Blaine "p,ssesses all the qualities which wonld al"
honor to the office Of Pr 'ident of the Uniteo
Staiesp and presents HIM as the first choice OF ii
majority Of the prope of the State for That position
TLc dc .g.tes are sail 10 stand Tor Blame, iO
| BristOw. and for COnkli"S:
| IT. II L.ean,
~ ". A. WHEY,
al Large J. ". Davis,
". X. simmons lcol)
Dist l. ". L.. St cu-OI ard y. GOr,'r
II John 4. schry and f. ". A. Moore.
| IIIZ ID. E,nsdcll and Enscue Dana
WISCONSIN
SOLID DELEGATION ~ tAVOR OF BLAINE
There have been vague reports g.. at the Wisconsin
| DELEGATION is no longer unanimous for Blame iu'
| they have taken no trustworthy form. The Con
| vcution which elected them adopted unanimously a
| resolution highly complimentary 10 hnn. HIS
frend, claim tnaJ he VIII have the entire ~ VOte'
TIE TERRITORIES.
| 1ury ARE ALL CLAIMED FOR BLAiNE-THH MAJORIIN
PoR Hnd-oNE FOR BRisrOw.
REPORTS have been thus far received from only slX
! of the mue Territories OF these Arizona tbc Ds-
nj + of Columbia Montana, aud Utah aio known TO
he for Blaine and Wyoming Is Instructed tor Bins
| tow Dakota has sent an unconmiiicd delegation.
and Idaho. New-NiexcO and Washington are still TO
| Le heard from. ,,,.,,, ..c,,>,