The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-03-08
THE COURTS.
states Circuit Court

thelot. In the sum OF $4,000, was accepted
as his security.
L. 5. Dennee waived the reading oil
the. three indictments and plead not
, guilty. The Court maintained the bal
on the first indictment ut $4,000, and said
he would consider about reducing the
amount Of bonds i'm the other two cases
Henry O. Miller. ESQ, was assigned
by the Court rs counsel for Adolpht
Pluche. sd
Mr.. John McWhirter, on the charge OF
accepting brides to influence his con.
duct as an officer OF the Government
4 was atraianed. and pleaded not guilty
Messrs. Henry Schultz and Nathan Dial.
sheimer were accepted as his sureties In
the sum of $1,000. tJd at
Mr.. William G. James was trraigned
under the same charge rs that against
Mr.. John Henderson, and pleaded not
guilty. Mr. Francis John was accepted
rs his surety in the sum Of 5000.
superior Criminal Court.
Present. Hon. Fl. II. Steele, Judge.
On the 9Th inst. his Honor, after over
ruling the motion In arrest Of the judg-
ment. sentenced Joaquino Florenza.
convicted of murder. to be hung on such
a day rs the Governor may deem fit.
The rule for u new trial in the case of
the State vs.. Jean Duviel, convicted of
elnbezzlement. was tried and u new trial
was refused.
The case of the State VS.. Mary Ann
Haley. on charge Of grand larceny,
was taken up. and q jury was being
impanelled when this report closed
In the case Of Mary Ann Daley, the
jury brought in q verdict OF not guilty.
In the case Of the State vs. Ghetano
Stevens, Hattie Cook and Louisa Moore,
tried on o charge Of grand larceny. The
State falling TO make out q case against
the defendants, they and the jury were
discharged.
In the case of Mary Ann Daley, the
attorney for the prisoner, q. Santini,
ESQ, deserves special mention for his
winning bis first case. 4
second District Court.
Present. Hon. A. l.. Tissot, Judge.
Succession of WIN. G. Kee, on petit
ton to recognize agent. etc.--It was or
dered that the said petition. John ID.
Rouse. be recognized as the duly con-
stituted agent and attorney In fact OF
the minor Henrietta J. Lee,} wife Of
VIM. II. Hagedom. and of her said hus.
band, and that rs such he be authorized
and empowered to act as prayed for In
his petition, Of date Feb. 10, 1876.
Matilda c. Englnan vs.. Mary Rebecca
Thompson and husband. 1T was Dr.
dered that there be judgment decreeing
n partition OF the property described in
the petition filed herein on the 4th Of
January 1876. that for the purpose Of
effecting said partition the property be
sold by Eugene Waggaman, Civil
Sheriff. for cash and that the parties be
referred to Andrew Hero. Jr.. notary
public, to effect the partition OF the pro-
ceeds of sale. hm HT
Succession of Matthew Covy. On mo-
ton Of w. o. Denegre, etc, It was or
dered that e. I. Parker, Public Ad-
administrator of the estate of Matthew
Covy. ia s
Third District Court.
Present, Hon. u. Meunier, Judge.
d. 4. Carroll VS.. VIM. q. Brown. A
new trial was granted &
A. NJ. Haas vs. l.. A. Leberque. 1t
was ordered on plaintiff failing to come
forward and prosecute his appeal that
the judgment of the lower court be re-
versed us in case Of a non suit, p
Il. A. Burke VS.. John Schneckerberger
It was ordered that the Injunction here
Il, Issued 3 be made perpetual, and thet
court. on the 18th Of November. 1876, be
set aside and annulled and that the case
be reinstated for trial.
M. Soye vs. Vincent Pratt On mo
ton Of Il. b. rmudez. Esq, Of counsel
for the plaintiff and for reasons suggest
cd and on file, it was ordered that Jos
eph Anbruste be, and is hereby s,,bro-
gated to all the rights OF plaintiff to the
note, mortgage and Judgment herein,
without recourse against plaintiff and
that defendant be notified hereof.
james w. Sanford VS.. Chas. Lacoliines
There was Judgment for the plaintiff
in the sum Of 5000, with legal interest
from Dec 9Th, 1875. .re...77 t.g,
.ti Fourth District Court. s.,
Present, Hon. B. l.. Lynch. Judge.
Palmer 81 Co. va. Beners IL Goa
new trial ms to Joe Murphy was granted
and the suit as to him was dismissed.
Union Bank of Tennessee vs.. A. M. |
Waddell, Geo. Connolly ct nj On mo- |
ton IL was ordered that the interroga-
tories, facts and articles be taken as |
confessed, and that there be Judgment |
for the plaintiff In the sum OF $11O worth |
of scrip issued by the Home Mutual In !
surance Company for the year 1861, on |
which there is $26 interest due, sub
ject to u deduction OF so attorneys |
fees for drawing the answers to inter
rogatories. a8a wax
H. Fifth District Court. -! |
Present, Hon. u. North Cullom, Judge.
p. b. Vergez VS.. A. Manesier third |
opposition OF Leclerk e Broussard -
1t was ordered that the injunction |
herein issued be made perpetual, with I
damages. fiT.s.I f'5 ".''t@
DIR. A. +. I.ehr VS.. q. w. Stringer ct
default of the Adolf March,
1876, was made final in the sum of 1925, |
with eight per cent interest per annum
from the 18th Of February, 1876. I'm
Mrs. l.. Hoffman VS.. Mrs. Z. Hohle.--
There was judgment for the plaintiff in |
the sum Of $3.50, with five per cent inter
est from March 10. 1875. nv tref |
A. Wizard VS.. Peter McGreevy. |
was judgment for the plaintiff In the
sum Of $198 10, with five per cent inter-
est thereon from January "A, 1876.
N. ID. Wetmore VS.. o. S. Burdet ct
al.-There was non-suit as to Edward
McKeoD, and continued by preference
rs to other defendants. olf +.s
sixth District Court.
Present, Hon. A. Saucer, Judge.
Godefroy q Bouny Vs. Louis Hubert. -
The default OF the I'd inst. was made
inal for the sum of $3.50, with five per
,ent interest from August 1, 1878, ten per
cent on said amount for counsel fees,
With lessons lien and privilege upon the
herein professionally seized.
Owners Of schooner ID. Il. Everett VS..
Paul Dullut.-The default OF 10th OF