, 1876-01-16

&C. .@,
ccmnsEd1neuta Hero Jewish prevails extensive
y in bitholox churches. This opiuion has been
guat1y strengthened Under TIM ao;tat;on of tha
so.,.t. .,,..t;,, ~ ~. o,t.s.t.
ooaoa'n 4'eeNton' iol u41n5 scals 'uo oaooa1n
ity Of tho Fourth Commandment. Tho Jous and
eome Christians uayo sustained. BIZ the sauao
,,,r ..e,t,... H., .. c.lh.th n,', ;sa.a;r...
saw auo'ue1 "0s a. o"~ossu A"o 'Aso''o's'e"-
cs has leu 10 REVISION oi t'e argumes1t. anu lAe
conclusion has bccone moro general that the
moral inv vas given alono to the Jews, and that
!, ,,.ac,a .1ror viii tBa 1au:sh 1;s,one,t;o,
.r,.~s ,'1::.' "" =: :.
a'9 'A4o'eu' =" A""' -.'A3o' ooop-oo"''o
pfclud'ce AGAINST the JoWs, because o1 their re-
lection Of Christ. Hence all things peculiarly
o.st ,,,o-, a., hn o,,,,., u q 1e.r;ab SAL
,Aa.. ;. .fGa o"c ~ ~ "o
pas"' 1lase 10 ceato"eo al'oh o'o'uei ~ ea''"
ing it the Christian Sabbatn-
Iho little Jewish sabbath 10 an 1maclnnry
one ni IA n ,sg ~ h'a rbeln aa o.
weekly Sabbath given to tho jews as distinct
people separate from tho one mado' o'ssseq.
anu sanetlaea ss tno creation 1ol ~ t1en. -
"a: clSen 81 "orshlp dav, because u1a testao
on II. Nnen II was fcHea,ea 10 tua se"s' aae
ves'nal reason Tor IT, that Cog reated on u. mas
assigned az tiie rcasoh !ofi.. LUG tern, Gnlis-
tan oaboath 10 also unknown 10 the bfpso.
1ais tenn 10 neea merely 70 uis.iueuisa .uo ~
no" commonly on5:rSea oy Tug 1 Lnuica 1'9ul toe
day observed IL tAo old Iesta3nens o1spea-
sas,on: ,,,
Hh!e tae m1fa' la*. as . "oole, rs oecaateo
jewish It'll Irece?E' win enc exception; as9 &C
cehteu as 5000 tn.1htiau uoctluies, " ~ cust
isncd oy Ell Cntls1lans- tAs Gotisetuosa ~ 'u.e
III questlouaole. Wy snou4o uua s1oup "
setbof IN one coae ~ 1uio ~ taoIa'
government ifeeeoH that neeosu 10 ue
changed when tho aom,niattat1oa OF Inc eaalr
government "as coan@eu: an a3 eAan'inhtiou W. VI
ia phuo39tng VIA uo nucu ~ settlo t1o lueo-
tion. Is tee moral Ia" IN Ehole Or IN part Jew
ieh? The collsteral questt1n OF the daS OF tno
Sabbath sill tie settled with the man question.
II the moral law VAS given 10 the JeWa only,
aud had it's application only to thsir dsspcns:-
ton. tban it affected them onlr, leasing all
Others FREQ from its restraints. Hence, mono OF
it's pIeccpts could bind Camille or CHRISTIAN
conscience, or be rule Of life to them 10 gov
ern their actions towards Gud or man. On tho
eenetal proposition that tho moral lar ia Jewish,
no special application OF any of its ptecepts
could be made to others. Tho Law in it's hlss
precept says: .'Thou shnts hare no other gods
before me-" OF course none bus Jews are
boucd By this p.ecept. Christians, hloham-
ncuans. aud all UaEans, arc left FREQ to
have as 1nauy gods as they may choose.
All this they could 90 without FIN, foS 60 ID"
existed to restrain them trom Pantheism in
general, 0. selecting at pleasure eois to au1t
ti:-ir fancy. The law in its third preceps for
bus the taking OF the Lord thy God III vain,
b :: tho law being Jewish, does not RESTRAIN the
christian. He may rake the name OF the Lord
iavs do not bind Chrlstlans. The law ia ITS sac
ond precept forbids making aud worsnlploE 1m-
ages but this Restraint rests upon lhoae ouly
who nra under tho law. III its fourth trecept
the law requires Gods Tost-day from creation 10
be ko: t holy. 1t doea not al7ect any but jews.
Such are some OF the lenu'ts Of the doctrine
that the moral !zw 10 jewish: These results arc
palrebe absurdlties, and yet they are legitimate
from tho F. opposition that The moral Law ID JoW-
ish. These absnrdIt!es are ths >, natural ont
e,owths from the position Of the Church on the
Sabbath coct'lnc: The Church does accept al
the utteshncen OF tue moral 10" ~ q su'e u me-
With the o@cett'on OF ls5 1ou1th ptecopt; II
claims that tho law IS noly' Just, ana Gooo. ao5
spiritual. and .delehts ~ II a1tef me ln"alu
man. Tho stng!e exception Is MAUI oeca.ss
tho practice Of the church does Got agree win
this rrecept 1he encrt o. lac Gnutcn 10 sus, ~
tain its worshlp.daJ ~ tue notnoflsy OF toe
Fourth Commandment having 1a'lea' 1ae Go9lce
is left between callln1 ING "uo4e luo'a' ~
jewish or cnanslng lsS ptaeeee ~ w. ,aa
rhe Sabbath law. The iormer a'te'nAtlso nag
been adopted as tue !rosI coaHen1ens, t3Sato,ess
0f all its Inconsistencies anu ps IL the eaaIca III
floating along IN the Destructive t4ao OF no
lawism.
AL advocates OF tno Psopos't.on tn"s tuo uota
law VAS JeWlhn. anu ApiHea to tue 1e"o ou'3'
would promptly ropudlate tho logical sequence
that honor to parents was je"lsn' anu appAeo
to Jews only, taat adaiteEV' A4HnS' s!eat-
Ing, bearing faIse "ltbese' anu coset
Ing, were oeaiSnea Us 1est1a''i,s ~ upon
Jews only, while all Gentlles and Ill Cnf!s'lans
we're Tree from these restraints, ana a. loettE
to do any OF these acts without conm!ttlne HI.
AL the procepSs OF tue mora !as are Je"asa IL
any Of them are. Ii all arc Je"iss' tnen Jews
only are bound by them. All otnsf men, are
luwleee. for nowhere else can ne hnd auLnof7ty
for transferring tnese pEccepts to Gent11es or
Ch4ietiaus. The declaration that the moral Ia"