The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-09
COURT NOTES.


Present Hon. w. b. Woods, Judge.
The United States vs. West Harris.
Philip Hulzel VS.. Louis Fasnacht sugges-
ton Of A. VOORHEES, that this case would be sub
mitted TO arbitration. It was continued.
motion Of the United States District Attorney.
Western on Co. ". New Orleans. St. Louis and
Simonds to rescind the order fixing this case. w..
?, Rouse. attorney for PLAINTIFF was on TIL"
John Henderson was arraigned on finding
Il me of ths Unsa stes ss Laws on i've
sass JoR" Medny was Accepted IS bis
William J. Behan and John Thorn we're also
guilty. Messrs. Murdoch and Wood were ac-
copied as seeurities ~ the sum 81 slsoo ,.r ~
COUNSEL 9 dr " Il / ardered S%
why ibis c ss should net be- rsm"naed 70 tSe
him on April 49, 1875. rescinded on the grounds
A. Eusts ct assignees Va. J. j.. Imhoff ct al.
Il WINS ordered that tire exceptions filed herein
be- fixed for trial on Saturday. the 10Th instant
W Casey ReecIyer vs. iy9seP y Day nroroa
1875. why the assignment Of this cause for trial
should n? be SGT aside on tie grounds ~ me
captions filed by tho defendants in the above en-
titled cause being submitted. they were over
rqE Franz fns t osso ss%n a Rs st
The Jury were INSTRUCTED TO bring ip, II they
came to decision. TO the clerk sealed verdict.
Tho rule in the cause OF the Western Oil Com.
pany vs.. the New Orleans and Chicago Railroad
was dismissed.
superior District Court.
In the matter of the Homemade Shoe and
Clothing Manufacturing Company, praying.
etc. It was ordered that the. order appointing q
receiver be revoked and suit be dismissed with
City Of New Orleans vs. @. W. Dunbar h Som
On motion Of Sam'l p. Blanc. Assistant City
Attorney. twas ordered that suspenslve appeal
be granted to the city. returnablc the sd Monday
City Of Now Orleans vs. G.. A.. Breaux for 500.
VIM. A. Johnson for 1913 I'd Chase for $500 30.
II was ordered In this case that there should be
judgment for the plaintiff for the amounts oppo-
site the defendants' names. :,
City of New Orleans W.. ~. Charles Street Hail.
road Conpany.-It WIS ordered In this case that
there be- Judgment for the defendant,
Superior Criminal Court.
Present, Hon, II. II. Steele. Judge.
!, The, following findings were handed In by the
Grand Jury: one vs. Peel n Reed, on cnbezze-
ment Of A7soo, eqdorsed no trgo bill; one ",
ana battery second count assault with intent to
kill. endorsed u true bill in tho case Of J. kerri-
gan on both counts. and as vs.. w. J. OConnor.
State vs.. same parties, on charge Of false Inn
prisonmont. endorsed mot u true BILL
One ". Frank K Romeo and Bernard Baum,
Weapons Weapons, endorsqd "a true bi n esei case,
!, One vs. Joaquino Floronza,- ,Indictpept on
thf enargc Of raer true b
etc. was sentenced to fourteen years irnprison-
ment In the State Penitentary.
Second District Court.
Brown BSnchsr r and d lis Wife opened
= In tho matter Of tho. Introduction Of John Nc
Hugh, the case was submitted on the physician's
In tho succession of Philip Drumm Richard
Shackeford. ESD. attorney for opponent. H.
Lloyd claiming note Of some 5000 against the
succession argued the case. and tho final argu-
ment was fixed for to-day ut 10 m.
Fourth District Court.
Civil Sheriff Suit ior an. Injunction. for $3.50
T. e. Palmer / CO: Us. Il, Il. Benners 4 Co..
Judgment was for the plaintiff and AGAINST the
interest on 1919 20. at eight per cont, from Feb
ruary4. 1874 until Anal payment; and also in
terest on 1910 90 OF the said amount. at the rate
Of five per cont per annum.
Faring G. Bicnvenue vs.. Leda and Matilda
Preur-1t was ordered that the Judgment rem
dered herein on the 10th Of March. 1862 be- de-
elared null and void. II was. also ordered that
made perpetual. and tho defendants in in
junction oRfyy ~ . iSs.s & su Court.
Joseph Brandner va. N. w. Schmidt and l.. G.
Nick-The judgments. by default Of the 5ist OF
frmed In the sum Of $3.50, with legal interest
Lane Il Bodley vs. VIM. j., Cushing-There
was Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum OF
Arthur Poincy w. Robert Miler--On q rule of
tho 18th of january, 1876. 1t was ordered that the
rule be made absolute, and 1t was accordingly
ordered that the disbursement made by the
Sheriff be flxed at s55, and be taxed with the
costs.
Maria Morales Vs. Ismae Morales her husband.
Upon tho pcadings and evidence. the Court
took the same under adysement.
VIM. II. Reynolds vs.. keep, Hogan Galway.
show cause on the 18th Of February. 1915, why
the seizure and advertisement herein should
not be released and set aside.
Mr.. and Mrs. Weysham Wy. Pierre DeIean.-It
was ordered that the defendants show cause on
should not be set aside. and an execution issue
on the grounds on file.
Meyor Jacobs VS.. Joshua Lipman.-This case
was taken under adyisement.
Joseph Iiogler VA. John Wernock ct ALT was
ordered that the additional claim OF 500 dam
ages be discontinued .
Same vs.. same.-There was judgment for the
tho property attached. Plaintiff demand
against defendant. Peter Usencr. was rejected.
Frank Desseus W.. Henry Acknowledgement
was for the plaintiff for the sum Of $50. with
privilege upon The herein y ssuS Naras
Judgment was for the plaintiff for the sum oil
s&3g So etc.
Joseph r. Turck vs.. Mrs. Mary D. Locke: wife s
Of Alphonse ACKNOWLEDGEMENT was Tor the
plaintiff for the sum of 800.
sixth District Court.
L. NJ. Lewis and l.. Savage w. A. Trosclair:-
In this case there was Judgment Tor tho de-
fondant.
/. K. Levy Il Son VS.. Peter Inauguration
hcaring evidence and argument the Court gave
INDIGNANT for plufutiffS.