New-York tribune., 1876-06-05
DFCISIONS-JUsE 3.

s..-... ro,,,t-Chambrs-I,y Judge barrett
In the sSr q M as & es1ss ~ IN Sop econ S % Ss ref
should not be Substitute for the authority Of the Con
reported upon the Court before he committee
should Souinsie Third author
izng CLERK On ths PasS d ne ne T go t e. b "o
iiy OF the patents &c. efore the order made
by the evidence Therefore constrained hold lns me
pothng to add to my previous as to their asy
The motion TO & so 9s cos oIseI and 81
Kegn &C. sgt The Mayor cThe plaintiff wac not only
she had sach circumstances would be
sapspy costs Of the had the verdict been Inc other
would not have thought Of granting an extra allowance
kobbe and Gilman, &c, sgt tGiman -orders granted
IL DSi ShsisS dSHGFsnled AnssS agt Di!fdThs jaT'ic
tona point raised by counsel as uhGeslsna s osse mas
Term this view shall follow the decision
SSn 81 GS ?usIss ssss@s az shat @soOn ' the
rss%er stSR %s6s agc 0renna ASG Be1is
NJ H9y kS S hasS M ss Hf d 10 nTS pp SS
avery Bum Teeeyer In ae aer Of Tie eerbea'e @ cot Of m
pear TO state the Of managers officers Of the club
ss Section S t yaG G ae
%1oS GRANTED ss9 at d ey m we i q ao d s I ss sea
agt Ryens ~ How 800 SOIL Oliver agt Morrison
ME bn complaint Banta agt hent 1t would ap
what upon tho construction force given
nance o. The Common Council The ordinance Is NOT set forth
Before deciding the wish have ordinance in
sgt Levy.-Any application for a motion Tor =
@e pSss sSss .s must Submit 5 Gasf 5s os S
lug the ground. on leh they respectively claim and resist
the bin Of eosts such briefs may be submitted Within
power attorney this motion purports
n the Sta OF Csor o' tho Sss esas o s s's "a oi
o. Sta' required % Sy SECTION "a Of q
shs ate Se ~ @ SStnS an ss
US subject y the nortgag &C. do not especially
how he can he Is bound OBEY order or
yO tho penalty oi Ssms m eGsSSs 1 IT Ts = obey
there the moving desired leave
% DC So an saO adav must be served on ths
S1: as S' sa sGS c SS Gy S h ts se sS
70 nave eson made on tae n s.4 OF NAY rs % not esr
Of this renders the sGavt OF slight
sSns Tie ofSr a. shall dispose Of The motion on The pspSIs
as They saS Is .ddayl's read N support Of monSs for
was lnssaSAs DO hot IN my opinion bring tue case within
been hsd 70 es sround for yaeat ng the Am Ins CO.
Harb sSt Ladow sspdSrS s Is e BSuo a, mS rant m
QUESTION in tas Il a. 70 Wheeler
pesred in the aeIon made deaSi putting In no
taxation OF ths costs had been served UPON, him
pDss S the Vns s no. % Of Of ,as as G0g Ss1s
.ase: 70 reqgI. ths pAns attorney copy the
Ton for judgement and by attending on thai application
sale, whose duty would be- 6nder lie Te 10
publish the nouee cannot SEQ that injustice
been innged MotOn Is therefore denied with 10 costs
II
The sound OF 10 Va
cate the order of arrest Will Do denied IN tie
Defendants In custody, ,he yanced upoD
the calendar for trial. Rule no COSTS Buck
master ag Never and anOI indie upon the margin
Of the stenogrsphers minutes rulings upon the various
Questions Submitted. Butterfeld agt Klaber ct al
aus a. ,p plsiIuns , make out prms facie
sn injunction, and thejustee whom were
presented IN The exercise Of his discretion granted the
ollhaIy order The afndavt read on te mari OF
he ueehushts is 70 deny ali tho equities the cOnIant
ana a cannot On this iaOtiOn matter ~ sai
rubOng machine as s alleged H.
nyuncuon mus De continued Mckee agt iee
lsobt. 45O] Injunction continued with $40 costs to as
event Saomop ssL "nbur-No,op denied without Cots
see remarks OF Rosekans j. 2o A. " 1851 matter Of
George Alexander Brown, fnaDLt not dsDned thst
The infant Is the child OF the petitioner Adlne Brown Is
CLAIM which made custody child by the resnona
ont be sustained OF the provisions the sct of
1873 were complied with At the time that the respondent al
eges that the cd given 1t be pre-
tenaed mat the respondent has adopted the child laws
1919 1861 After careful examination
nou testimony In kb
nas te petitioner did child
Under 1rso circumstances 10 follows the
mo,he entitled 70 the custody OF the child y accord
Icy ~ orusred hungerford agt Sznfcrd-Whe no
os - the power VI the Court 10 grant amendment
'f ulak hat tlis motion should bs denied On the