, 1876-02-18

0, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY
the Examining Committee Of tho church 10
tic msmbor would not be considered iii act Of
jiYcoutteaY. Il would DO considered m act Of
discourtesy ouly under such circumstances -
would maks it appear such to tho public.
THE OLD BCAHuAL.
4 somewhat lotg.hy examination followed on
Tho subject OF the West case, and the lnveatiga.
tiou whicl, took plnce In 18TH
Judge Winslow was questioned In regard to
tor Henry u. Doncn through II. u. Clsf''n. Iio
WAS at Woodstock 1t tho time. and couldn't
como, but sent word That llo had nothing 10 say.
In rosponsc IL luestions as TO- whether
or not tho Committee had refused TO boar
to hear ono wtnoes, bfrs. Woodruff. The re-
port of the conclusions Of tue Investigating
Committee was read b Roaatef Raymond aud
was greeted With npp]sueo.
THE PLYMOUTH CORPORATION.
Er. 6heazEnan And hlf. Deccher Eeplicd 70
questtons touching tho laster's connection with
Tho Christian Union. and IL regard 70 tho a..
legged CLOSE corporation which Was said to exist
ject, Mr. Docclor said that as they were In the
kingdom OF Money, he desired TO etato that
the trial Of his case had coat him f118,o00, and
ho did not caro- about going through mnny more
auch trials He afterwards gavc long history
OF tho organization OF tho church.
DR.. Wil!etta asked him whether ho knew any
thing Of h's own knowledge that would Prevent
DR.. Btotrs, 1ndlngtop. aud himaef !oV!uG one
another, to which bo replied that he did not.
1Ie could thcro give them his hand, and way,
ct tho doad bury tho doad"
Mr. Heoeher and hi. shchrman explained why
Il Mas tlat they Lad not gono out Of shsir own
church for an Investigation committee. tbs
main point being that, according to CongscBa-
tiona1 usage, the Church ought to 10 tho propsr
tribunal.
DEEcHEn'a nosros vIstT..,
Dr. h1oars reforrod to an article clipped from
Boston Journal aud published in Now York
morning .papo., and. referring to 1t, asked Mr.
Dcecher u ho (hlr. Decchcr) went 70 boston TO
pack Tho Council. snd IT no had list Of churches
With him whom he wont there.
Mr. Deecher replied IN tho negative to tho frat
question. mud eaid that uo Ind list OF churches
with him, but a1r. Mcars bud made no addition
70 ~, IL OF euegest1ons u folatson 70 u.
ING putting OF tneso lucHslone cauhed con1'd-
ctapie dopas9, several OF tno n, mem mnefn eontena-
ts rnas . tnG Connc "@s nos 1ue proper p'eee 10
nt. Meals Asaea whe.nel VI 9 not tnele "ah any
eFlt called cfann oonncctca WITH tAo case wh'ch
TUG pa9soi Taa tsya1g ~ cusel ".
1s. ~ oGScnsa tt znpnSa, ~ ei, tnote ~ not.
lasea AGAIN re story OF nia 6olng 20 boaton On
account OF inlafepfeaeotat1ohs WHICH wore Made
ID M Some OF sne lapefs there.
me lev AZ. to.uotl;lcn naked ~! the pastor this
might re!ato an Interview which he once had
with you in your honBc. and would you bc willing
that both Drs. htorss and l}udington should
give to the public everything thsy know Of
you .....
BURLINGTON AND sTonns.
Iho Nny. Henry Al. Htorru objected to thtE
question being answered. and disputed tho pro-
PIlcty u bringing up such questions III couu-
ci!s.
br. Uacon gatd that the question conlt not be
answered Unless Dts. Ssofta aud budirgton
could % brought III to lear the ansscs ana re-
ply TO u: Inis brought out somewhat ntsoug
spcecn from ~. neechcI WHO d'd not think =
iaif f tha. 40 nnoaid 10 PLACED On tue Gtanu ana
asked hach questions. without being allowed to
2nHWcr thon. Lie said they were lnjurlnE him
10 save themeelvos, aud protested aga!uat duch
actloh pelne takon. ..,
lhe COUNCIL soon after adjourned until BALI
past7.
| VAN ce1T'a REMARKS.
at the evening heasion Judge Van Colt ad-
dressod the Council. IIo desired that there
SHOULD DO aomo understanding regarding tho
not 4here from tho CAutcll of stle pilgrims; ho
was not there aa tie Representative Of Mrs Mpul-
ton, nor as tho representative OF anybody but rs
= private gontlouau, responding 10 an Invita-
lls might say. aud thought it ueconsaly to state
ths above. 10 that tltre might 10 no nlsappre-
hsnsiou iu the Council In regard to the Iuattor.
Dr. Wolcott here Interrupted him and snid It
/ HR4 uo1t bA1b kHG tOHlt1N4 ~ tH1 AVAlGh b49A41
| bs understood, 80 thFt there could be no u,isuu-
derstaudtng with roeArd to that. They desired tho
gentleman 70 come bofoso thcu ~ counsel of
h1rs Mouiton to givo his ata!omont Of the noSo-
tsationA between himself ~ her representative
and tlo Committee Of Plymouth Church fur the
calling OF a Mutual Counoti..
Judge Van Cott repeated that ho was not ap-
| PE.elnE AZ couuscI !oF huy uuot "! hS HI HUI
v1dnal WHO hau represented Mrs. Moult1n. io
theh went on a. geeat length tc relate tho
negat'atleh pet"eet nlnaeil ana .tne gofn-
mstseo u rogata TO. tic Mutual Coulcil. Tbey
met on Jan, Z to name eho clntchea and tue
ministers without charge 20 constitute tho Coun-
Gu. It being expressly understood stiat each
ehoaln choose one. half. uo suggested that the
COMMITTEE lnaa OF, but,
WITH CHARACTERISTIC AopEsTT,
thfs great Comnlttnt from tA1a GToat chnrc
declt,led. anu aalu ho should lead OF. Tue
sneaker hero asked permission TO sotEace hla
stops aud give tho proceedings Of tllo previous
meetings, At which II WAS stated by the Commit
ee9 that 10 churches should bo se!cotod froul
| eltlef OF TWO cit!ua. Ibis h0 didn't assent