, 1876-06-30
TILE COURTS.
Decision Of an Insurance Case by
Judge 8todgett.
q. K. Turner Turns Up with Another
Batch Of Land suiA.
Initiating Trade.Nark...Retord Of Judgment,
and Eew Sults.

recover H. 600 Insurance the stock OF iewtIry 0f
plalntlfFs which was destroyed In tic hrcrof July
~, 1S74.
Thu dcIensn wah that The policy was obtained by
ffand as il.c Company led to believe that the
tulfcy was tic sainc terms with tue nther phil
eIc', there being $40 600 of offn-urAncc rlantIna
Stock wh!le n fact It covered toss Gil ;cwe',y ''in
safes mud tauts, " while tho other policies were
only IN jewelry lin snfes', bceolG thal thc nutt
waa not hrnught In time, the policy Conlanesl n
condition TINT suit on policy shunld be brought
within +i1 MONTHS and the present snt, was not
brought until MARCH,, 1A75, cirht mouths alter the
Grt. jtAppcarrd, however, That tho proofs WIRE
furnished Aug. 20. lH14, ard that III November
following lie t'u'npanys ngent called and asked
for further nroefa. which RIyen At the ran,o
time expressly waly1hg tho condition as regards
tins.
judge nlodectt hell, h, to the 1rst affection.
That there wns nothing sllown to r'tablst, f.aud.
but that the provision as to tcwcTry In eafcs AMI
vnula Intended TO cnyer the par nj tho stock
III the sau1! NJ the Wabash avenue HIVE ut,rr tha
fenoyal to Stac strcvt. In regard 70 the tecont.
objection, inc Judge suld that tho sn,!.ton wns
in,s, irnu:na,Iy SHIRT a!toagl 5 Of cour,s lrxa'
- short limitation II there wera my attending
circumstance which would Jnrtify extension. lii
fore thc Company's agent applied for raadltonaI
proof. and II ille loss !'at tl,rn bcca adjusted
and M The Hstnl ninety aays. for 1aymcnt eivc,
and they would have wnlyrsl the condition. Thc
circumstances showed the agent considered he wna
w5Sa rs5e4sa ns n a1ar a1a n's M' "a tshsreFe s s I s
amunat u sle'r claim with Interest.
~, MORE or Il. X. TURNER'S OPERATIONS
tons seen, to hayc Affected othet culntlc4 t.an
Gssa 2sWs!sFy WsF,y 1e's W.ns;ay of %s,eer
eaurt M p araha. st. wan FSssa wss Ssts, sSsit MsSlt
Holloway; ,niadoip|us 4. Turner. duncan j.
KlIbe, asking for certain reliuf fsnm aonio sup.
sSs aesss !s;t + 5s1y; issa wii'iaS %lii Vl!i:sa
q, u. !, y Mercer County. rnder thIs power u
this, md .omc lime in lau4, Wilson comnicncod a
;q IN secs1,t II e In1sd ,as. Circuit
wv entered, md Judgment rrn'lcfcd in fa,or oi
Fiso years atscT. and op tl,c 2U day Of Octobor,
1S'o, Il; X. Turner obtained from Wilson IL stp-
ulAtian by which Il was agreed that the ju'!gmen.
In ejectmcMt In hls favor should b. rroptnr4 tho
default set Hsiac, md new trial awarded. IN
Deccmbcr following, by agrocmclIt tl!c suit wus
sratou, tic attendant III ,hst suit, for whom ostcn
slbly Turner nctea. March. ~. 1871, this div.
assa, q wa; set a5s as caase reins,a'ed writ
painnnt elected.
nc i1uN HlnAts s!lul Judgment 3H kHE EJCEL~
mint wns sut stide ~ pursuance Of fraudulent
agreement between Wilson anG Turner; thu, Tur-
k stnsa q q ths lsas ! f95 ys 1.a
eesmea e9 tss Ill @ I'll % s IL tSs!s ts &
pS IT, eat AK tha a he 1i VIZ e, ir IN
title under tho ejcetnrht suit and seven yents
sc Il 41ss ss se iit S,. III s s al
stumbling titlrs At the time Of the deed by
Wilson to him, md therefore .slss TIM, tl.p cfefl-
under thu. cjcetlnent suit; that tho fraudulent
Judgment !n tlat suit 1iay he keE ash!e. the ju:
tered confirming tho iIl!o Ut present in him ,co.-
planant asasi ar.y catn.s On tue part u lie d..
| fcndn,lt4. or any Of them.
In The Circuit Court Of Cook County, also. Tur-
ncf's footsteps madn themselves v!Hlbl" aEulu In
ll.e sapu t 9t aye e]sssnlen. suits against divers
assins]t ] ] ieoige " i md Harus wns.ow, III sT. e Ts
cover potscssloH of tho y. +. i uf Sec 30, III. H.
~! AUD u Henry Schmidt 10 RECOVER ths s. W. Il
Ths tl5d !. II by ttc eame M nls'nMtItis M acn!cs. tAo
IL recoser tho s. ". i II Sc. ii, Is. il. '4" "
The fourth y ato by the Aa'nc parties nsa!n,t tho
gs @ x G"kus q Soc. &
iiMe NTH and ,sss is llkcwl.c by the rnmc qtar-
tcttc against j. Young Seanlnoll md August Wus.
SOW, to recover the n. T., Il nt SEC, W, :js, II.
l FOX Il liOwANI.
cas couri ~ Jolln Mci,ran ssait,st larfy " Fox,
y. u. Ho%arl. tharlsa II. Atkinr, and fhotnas
burgess. e rccoyrt s., Ui5.2i. II thu af1asft
held 10 hMl. MeDtan states that OIL tlc llth of
March. ls5', l.: 6 & t9 h99ns applied r him to pur. r.
FuI i Howard aid saar:.niecu by Xiku" i i,ui:. i:
CESS. PIalnt!G ut arst declined, rny!ug that sol
vent 1rln could .pay snr, discount ~ VIA Of.
aud atntrd il,at Fox i Howard would moi
lose the shayc 'Aat they had contract for build
r5Sn IT, work t. htkins hureess, %io wanted liz
money, TN these representations Mciican says l,c
dtaeounted ~ n9'e, eHt he iat e!uce LEARNED y,
eeyiug l1ln, Howard and Atklln being !Ls person,
% Te0 .As ss's sehsns "yA yAsSs ,F%sS'S !" Of 'n
il III liks ht' way. w Mci'saa therefore a.ls ' f"r !,
compelled to give bail aa security for the lMyMcn
Of aiy Judgment he niny rocu'cr. Long nl:o ais'
Howard and Atkins o nuke lu representations h
DID, but, claiming Tint ut tho tine he SUPPOSE
Judge Mciilistcr ordered TINT cap,ns be bsnct
for tho urrept of tue defendants, their bn! beinI
n4ed nj s., U15 ~ ,!u amount Ut plaintiffs c'ain,
| EAuLE WHITE LEAn.
Cincinnati, W Heath i stilligap, of this ely,
cure brought 20 restrain tLr defendants trun! In
yesterday rctidcre! ,eeIsun In fAyor q tho ctHs
plaAants inc lattsr had BEEN for thirty yeaF
s"x xxsI, se' sYapys e1xsS # ~ s wy
c!aIhrd to tern, Trade n.rk that II designated
iloash s Milltsan Ind inifIngcI tller' rights b
manufacturing I'll Interior article a.Hl branding
E j. 4s esStsus ss !' w9t % s Ms,ss
an cuylc, though tue Abtl dldefcd in coof ~,
general arpearanec. Judge lilu!srlt held dc
, plaina,.ls' lsu,!u-nark, gtantud ~ injuuc.lo
against iis fnrthrr use. An Referred the csu u III