National Republican., 1876-12-07

PRISON BIRDS TO THEIR CAGES.
Supreme Court of the United States.
On motion of Mr.. NJ. 1. Townsend, VIM. H.
Hale esq, of Albany, n. Y, was admitted to
practice as an attorney and counselor Of this
on motion Of Mr.. P. Phillips, l. W. Goodrich,
esq. of Marlin, Texas, was admitted to practice
as an attorney and counselor Of this court; C,.,,
s5S Comfy Of San Francisco. This cause was
gubIritted en- printed arguments by Mr. 3 W.
EoIIaday, Of counsel for the appellant, and BY
NO' 4s7, Gassigned) The Lake Superior aAd
Mississippi Railroad Company, appelR.nt, vs..
No. els. [assignod.l The Atchison, Topexa and
Santa Fe Railroad Company, Appellant, pc ant, VS.. The
was eo4Iinued by Mr.. Solicitor General Phillips
Of counsel for the appellees, AID concluded by
No. Ia. John Dunbar Ct al, plaintiffs, VS.. Mar.
garet Myers, eXecutrtx, SCI and
No 81. Margaret Myers, executrix, &c, ap-
pella1t, VS.. John Dunbar ct al. The argument
Of these causes was commenced by Mr.. T. n.
Belts, Of counsel for Myers executors, &C., and
continued by Mr.. Samuel J. Classy, for Dunbar,
et
Adjourned until to-day at Il o'clock.
Circuit Court.
Before Chief Justice Cartier.
TIE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY
NuLcTED IN 5000 DAMAGEs-MANY SUITS GO
DEFAULT-THE UNITED sTkTEs MARSHAL
DEFENDANT IN A REPLEYIN ACTION.
Matthew Pabst vs. The Baltimore and Ohio
Railroad Company. This was action for dam
ages against the defendant, claiming 81, goo. The
Jury returned q verdict for 5000.
An action 70 recover sto4'Si, with interest froin
May Is, 1915 for goods furnished defendant. Judg-
ment for plaintiff by default.
an action 10 recover S3ssI9, with interest on
s2tl.99 at eight per cent. from August Is, 1875
and on s235.25 at eight per cent. from September
1875. Judgment for pla1nttu DIV default.
Jos. Wild & Co, VS.. J. W. Mcknight. An action
to reerver overdue promissOry note for s297 lo,
with interest $240.90 from April Is, 1876. Judg
VIM A. Drown * Co. VS.. Simon Heller. An
action to recover s29S. 10 for goods furnished de-
iendant. Judgment by default.
William B Green vs.. Brown Dexter This
was an action on an overdue promissory note for
500, with interest at 10 per cent. Judgment
fer plaintiff by default.
G. Lansburgh & Bro vs. Margaret Lee. The
plaintiff sued TO recover S1SS 81 for goods sold to
defendant Judgment for plaintiff by default.
Benjamin F. Grafton VS.. John Pool. This was
an action on an overdue promissory note for S225,
with interest from January g. 1876
Patrick Foley vs.. Royal Canadian Insurance
znee on property which the defendants refused
10 pay. Judgment for plaintiff by default.
John a. Jordan We. John L. Lay. This was an
subject to credit OF $3.50, and the defendant be-
ing indebted TO the plaintiff for rent and cigars
for 5000. So. Judgment of condemnation.
Vim. Orme & Sons vs.. John l. Lay. This was
an action to recover s95.5l for goods sold. Judg-
meDt of condemnation was entered
Abraham Morrell VS.. Grafton Tyler and John
B. Tanner. This was an action on overdue
pTomissory note for $500, with interest at 6 per
cent. Dismissed as to Tyler, and Judgment
Felix II. Draney vs. AdelDert B. Simons. This
was suit to recover $35e.65 balance on contract.
Nicholas H. Shea vs.. Marcy A. L. Parks This
was an action to recover slT0ss for goods sold to
N. H. Shea VS.. Marcy 4. l. Parks, administra-
tTiX CT Geo. A. Parks. This was an action to re-
cover s75 for goods sold to defendant. Judgment
Hall Hume vs. c. p Gautier and G. W.
Cook. This was an action to recover balance of
so, with interest from January q, 1874, over.
cue promissory note. Judgment by defanlt
against @. p. Gautier.
Hall Hume VS.. E. ]. Sweet. This wasan ac-
tion for $780, with interest from October 1873,
10 per cent. on overdue prOmissory note. Judg-
ment for plaintiff by default.
Freeman W. House VS.. Thomas Peter. This
was an action to recover 81 OOO with interest at 10
per cent. until paid, on overdue promissOry
Eote. Judgment for plaintiff by default and con-
German-American Bank vs. NJ. A. L. Parks.
This action to recover ESQ S4, with interest
from January 10, 1876, on an overdrawn account.
Judgment by default
Smith & Co. VS.. Callahan & Spalding. This
was an action to recover slS6 81 for material fur
nished to defendant who gave an order to satisfy
the bill on Robert Fleming, which was accepted.
Verdict for defendant.
This was an action to recover 500 for goods sold
and delivered to defendants. A juror was with
drawn and leave to amend pleadings granted on
the payment Of costs.
L. q. TiIIotson & Co. We John L. Lay This
was an action to recover ss7s, for goods sold and
delivered toplaintitf. Order of publication made
Charles h. Haddaway, use of John w. Leonard,
VS.. Augustus s. Nicholson. The plaintiff sues to
recover 81 0O0 with interest from June IL 1876,
an overdue promissory note, subject to credits of
t25o, paid October rs 1875, and March 9, 1S7es175
Judgment by default.
Hayden & BIundor vs. George II. Boston Co.
This was action TO recover $2I0, with interest
at six per cent. from October a. 1875, for use of
~. hnrrr Fo- So. la,-e
day each. Judgment by default against George
H. Boston and George ID. johnson.
Daniel Smith vs. VIM. H. Gibson. This was an
action TO recover Sl15. with interest at eight per
cent. from July l, 1876, on an overdue pronissory
note. Judgment for plaintiff by default.
Francis MOhun Sons VS.. Henry NJ. Diggins.
This was action to recover SlS8.to with inter-
est from February 6. 1870, for goods sold and de-
lireTed TO the defendant Judgment against de-
George h Turton vs. Seth A. Terry ct al This
VAS an action to recover 500, with interest from
May II, 1876, at per cent, on an overdue prom
issory note. Judgment for plaintiff by default.
Adolph Kaufman VS.. Alex. Sharp, United
the property of Samuel Bieber, bankrupt, and
plaintiff comes in with replevin suit TO recover
The goods, setting forth that he purchased them
before Bieber became bankrupt. Case stiil on
Equity Court.
Before Judge Wylie.
PROGRESS ~ DIVORCE CAsEs-INJUNcrIoNs OVER
RULED AND OTHERS MADE PERPKTUAL-CoN-
riEMATIog OF TRUSTEES sALE-DEcREEs TO
SUBMITTED.
Shipley VS.. Shipley. Suit for divorce. Appear
aIce Of absent defendant ordered.
Barker VS.. Gilbert. Dismissal OF bill as to lots
s. 9, 20, Il. Il. Il and Is, in square 11S.
Lee VS.. Phillips. Confirmation of trustees
sale.
Smith vs. Pope. Final confirmation of trustees
sale.
Cook VI. Hall. Injunction continued.
Abraham Morrell VS.. NJ. J. Morrell Prayer
for injunction Overruled.
Edwards vs. Hickman. Vacation of order dis
missing bill, and leave to file bill of record.
WoTthington VS.. Marquis. Pro coRfeSSo vs.
defendant, Earhart, and limiting TO take proof to
Hare vs.. Bennett. Pro contsssO VS.. all de-
iendantg.
walker VS.. MOultOn. Pro cOntessO vs.. de-
itndant, ,AlvOrd.
Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company vs.
Gallaber. Case continued, on motion Of COM
pisinant
CottTen VS.. schrirgeiser. Decree to be sub
Eitted.
Colored Union Benevolent Association VS.. Dis
triet Of Columbia. Decision allowing demurrer.
Kretchmar vs.. jackson. Continued.
French VS.. Plant. Exceptions to auditors
report sustained.
killmon VS. KiIlmon. Suit for divorce. Sub
Iitted by complainant.
Criminal Court.
Before Judge Macarthur.
CHICKEN THIEVES CooPED-CLoTHEs AND JEW
ELRY sTEALERs CoNVICTED-A GAME HOUSE
CASE NOT MADE oUT-HEAvY SENTENCES IN
PosED BY HIS HONOR.
Ananias Haskns and Sandy Henderson,
charged with stealing, August 2s, 1915, from John
SO.
Sandy Henderson, one of the accused is a
small boy, about eleven years of age, with