The Cairo bulletin. [volume] (Cairo, Ill.) 1872-1878, 1876-01-11
CIRCUIT COURT.
Jsm"avy Term. a. ID. 1879.

| Il. $. Yocum, Circuit Clcrl
| Alex. II. Irwin, Sheriff.
MONDAY, SEVENTH DAy-CivIL.
The following new cases stand on tn
law docket, having been commenced q
the present term:
No. 1921. 4. II. Irving vs.. A. b. Sey
more form Of action. assumpsit.
No. 1925. frederick Fairthore and The
odore Rand, firm of Fairthorne q Ran,
W. Sarah l.. Kline; form of action, as
sumpsit amount of claim 1886 0s.
No. 1925. George Bohmcr vs.. Il. V
Belzner and Sitti Bclzncr; form Of action
assumpsit.
No. 1927. School Trustees, township IA
range 4 wet, vs.. Charles +. King ant
Ezra King form Of action. assumpsit.
No. lO2s. Henry Berry vs.. John q
Barnard; appeal from justice of tn,
peace amour of claim $40 40.
No. 1920. t,hn II. Davis VS.. Mary A
Pillow appel from justice of the peace
No. 1880. william q. kurtz vs.. Daniel
Wright; form Of action, assumpsit.
No. 1881. Michael Mahoner vs.. Julia
Cahill form Of acton, assumpsit.
No. 1892. Patrick Fitzgerald VS.. Chas.
Budcr form of acton, assunpsit.
No. 1888. Robert Caldwell VS.. Henry
wisdom form Of act Ton, assumpsit.
No. 1884. John P. Frederick VS.. Mich
olas IIunsacker; form Of action. eject
mcnt.
No. 1924. Cairo aud y. Louis Railroad
Company ". Taylor, Parsons and Can
dee petition for condemnation of right
Of way.
No. 1896. John NJ. Nulcn VS.. william
Holden; form Of action, ej.ctment.
No. 1887. Julia B. Ear vs.. City of
Cairo; form Of action, trespass on the
case.
No. 1888. John Brown W. the Cairo
and st. Louis Railroad Company; form
Of action, trespass.
No. 1899. James lIendon VS.. John
Sprout; form Of action, assumpsit.
No. 1910. Wood Rittenhouse, treas
urer, ETC., vs.. walbridge & Bros. Form
of action, assumpsit.
No. 1O4l. Wood Rittenhouse, treasurer,
VS.. John T.. Gamble form Of action, as
sumpsit.
No. 1912. Charles +. Music Il Co. vs..
}. a. NJ. GIBBS; form Of action, assump-
sit.
No. 1913, James +. Comstock & Co.
vs.. Keer Brothers & Co.; form of action,
assumpsit.
No. 1914 Henry {. Thieleckc ".
Hiram Hill; for OF action, trespass.
No. 104a Morrisly Bros, and Fisk.
vs.. William Eiclhoff; form of action, as
sumpsit.
No. lOie. Rabbit, Hardness & Co. VS..
Stuart. Vim. White and +. White.
No. 10F. The City of Cairo VS.. Nefl
and Hanny form Of action, debt.
No. 104s. James and Richard Garland
vs.. Herman Levy appeal from justic OF
the peace.
No. 1919. John McNulty VS.. John Ho-
gan form of action. replevin.
No. 1850. Mary sullivan VS.. Cairo and
st. Louis railroad company form Of
action. assumpsit.
No. 1851. David T. Uultz VS.. Bristol 4
Stillwell form of action. assumpsit.
No. 1862. William Sickman VS.. Casper
Hainer and Joseph Hafner; form ofaction,
trespass.
No. 1858. jeremiah Dunlevy, Jr., VS..
Gilbert II. Greeley and Jacob Skeens /;
form OF action, assumpsit.
No. 1854. Power. fainter Il Co. W..
William Eichon; form of action, as
sumpsit.
No. 1866. John Sullivan VS.. Cairo and
st. Louis railroad Co. appeal.
No. 1856. Thomas IIealey vs.. Lou
Moore form ofaction, replevie.
No. 1867. Mary Geek for use Of John $.
Hawkins VS.. William Gatlin: Garnish-
ment,
No. lO5S. Bernard McManus VS..
Charles Newland: Form Of action, as
sumpit.
CRIMINAL,
John sullivan indicted for stealing
some clothing from John Furgerson,
plead guilty OF petit larceny and was SEN
fenced to the county Jail for twenty-five
days and fined fifteen dollars.
The case of the People VS.. David Hultz,
was commenced in the morning. The
defendant is charged with perjury. After
trial OF five or six hours duration the
jury returned verdict of not guilty
after being closeted about five minutes in
the room to which they retired ter the
determination Of their verdict
The case OF the People VS.. Petcr.Waldcr
der was commenced and the evidence
for the prosecution at the adjournment
Of court was almost all in. Peter Valdez
was indicted for an assault to do bodily
injury. lie is charged with assaulting
Michel Quinn with dray pin.
Oyster, Fish