New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1876-04-04
civil, NOTES.

In tbe suit Of PIunkett against Appleton. tho
General Term Of the superior Court has affirmed She rule that
JGse has no TO Sa VIII e ant o he
nug1rts ~ their counsel
In the case Of the Stafford Pavement Company
against Josh 4 Moahce fnr breach o' aconract
made 10y Monhcimcr 20 use hls influence have Tho paiHls
rsyemrnt Ne York siTcets and pay The Company
cent P n15e aS la a r i'1 eeer Tfm refuses %
disturb Judgment aFnst NM on w ft0lha tn's w. @ y
question Oy biz answer
H. the suit OF Jane. W. Smith against the Mayor
10 have the o. pier It the foot Of stanton ST.
relieved ion assessment for taxes tho Common i'as'
General Tc1 chief Justice Dily giving the oplion holds
that mo raht 70 wharfage j. nehcr land nor geIs'aA.
properly ncoeral h'reiimcnt and therefore not
labc 10 ara.o on, bIt we our - ~ ,ot coul ON
ass~s,,a'gt - paiot On aa 'h ,f b o
Iu the snit Of stephen y. Bfaguc against tho exec
tof. Of Rnfas l. Lord the superior Court General Term
Judge scdgick giving o opinion. do1dcs that though e'
ente u eonycrstoa b';.eeH the plAntG and Mr lord
w. mprgSss c 9h y Sr ' c a@ f Se'
Judgment he puiM m not De set aside on ih-i sfcuhd
ffum Lord out ten years ago BY ~ most oarne
ruDOoIy.
I'm the suit Of lord & Tayloracains: Lucas Thomp-
son the General rrm u superior Court End, that MIA
thompson ha,ns testified tla pending her butt Tor limited
divorce ard ,fis b. referee tia; she entitled
$50 weed amony but neic at a,ron W. ,2i' ~
husband turLrd 81 simply thc clothes ~" Then
LaI ou the plan- can recover nun hti husband io ai,
po1- Sold 10 the vito necessary 20 De- ~ ,e@ on hl canning
h,r on his account
Conrad Meyer was arrested by .Lrec policemen for
selling Eguor without ic'ns' locked mp for night IN me
station honl. and discharged hail morning. IL" sued
the three policemen the superior court. and had them
lscd and held bal IN soio each Tney moved 10 y1"ate
Tho OF l.r o. arrest Tho special Term refused nd te g nd
shi. a lI bo. t. d. raHsc o. TIE p,i
I'm vas only a m,s'"meanrr and me Et.sc Jaw dns mot
extend ,it IoRrTs police oirTs n roii on io u-tihtai
or. An officer only agtsl person Guilty O.. Ll.'
Asfhrrr was 10 likelihood OF Meyers running away warrant
should have b,cn obtained I'ie ".s a. nl
The suit of John Patton 10 restrain the NeS-l ork
Elevated Railroad Company from breaking into tho street
vault. OF tho Pacific the building II turnout IN
Greenwich ST. have been hoard yesterday before Chief
Justice Daly In Pleas special Term bat Roger a.
PRYOR having been Tho original nIuno lion was
obtained hs rTt-e iaNrs aakrd that tho argument on
motion frf rs continuance De- deferred Tor ~" uA9 NV
representatives. tie railroad company "pnrd ay lch dr
lay, specially q, th,i thought t,-I f ~
elevated lad IT, rights expressly prosIdrl tht SHOULD
s%gTessl thai The Sality 81 an deprived any
.; the right % appealing to The cont 90 ,oni.h
Of OF hand manner ,nJ adjourned The pV''edhs 70
Wednesday. $3.50
In the case Of Wihemina Wcis against eX-Sheut
Drenuan the plaintiff claimed that stock OF goods hers
which hal been seized b. sheriff attachment against
tho firm OF Myers ohse That firm At ono time owned The
o,p u Myers sold his interest In them 10 The phntiTs
husband and tho new conveyed all a Interest 20 one
Bauer who Immediately conveyed PLAINTIFF Tho defense
WAS MAT e.e an-frrs intended DE- Rad the creditors
1 i re- Totes OF nen To- deirSnd ia the conveyance By
iohse required by the statute ne not We direct Dh u inc
and circumstances attending transfer OF personal prop
~ry aro such put ordinary man Gu his guard and
lead mako Inquiries and lac did NOT do 90 thcn he Is
giving the opinion holds that th refusal wrong In other
nods lnat me ~ ne ntrd pon cIfcSmstsnces
aud therefore royorscs the Judgment for the plaintiff