The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-17
COURT NOTES.
Umited states Circuit Court.

Present. Hon. w. u. Woods. Judge.
The Jury in the case OF the United
States vs.. +. Dudenhefer were called
into court and reported that they had
not agreed. The court sent them back
In the case OF the United States vs..
Joe Chapman, charged with passing
himself off MS another person to obtain
bounty, Joseph +. Hornor, ESQ, attor.
ney for the prisoner by appointment Of
the court, representing that the accused
had been In Jail, In close confinement,
ono year and two months, urged that
the case be fixed. IL was set down for
trial for the first of March next.
Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing
Company VS.. +. Rickert IL Goa per-
pet,ial Injunction against said defend
ants from the use OF dealing IN any arti-
cles of caustic alkali. encased or envel.
voped In tight metallic integument or
casing, and also for all damages sus-
tanned by petitioner. to be determined
by reference to some master IN chan
Gerry.
Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing
COMPANY vs.. II. Il. Cogreve.-In this
case u decree of like character was rem
dered, and the damages sustained re-
ferred for adjustment to j. w. Gurley,
ESQ, master In chancery.
United States Tvs. +. Dudenhefer.- In
this case the jury. Wrought in verdict Of
not guilty.
+. +. Case, receiver, vs.. John Reed. ct
In this case the jury were still out
late last evening.
Allan IL Eustis, assigDces In bank
ruptcy for the American Mutual Insur-
ance Company, have filed 81 suits
againsts various stockholders.
Third District Court.
Present, Hon. J. Mcunier, Judge.
Gustave Bibeux, for tho use and ben
eft Of J. Donnclly, vs.. Mrs. Morse, r.
Lorio. called In warranty. The judg-
ment OF tho lower court was reversed.
Foarth District Court.
Present, Hon. b. l.. Lynch, Judge.
Francisco z. Martinez VS.. Mrs. $.
Burg Judgment for the plaintiff In the
sum OF 1876, with eight per cent interest
on $500 from December 20, 1879, and on
$40 from July s., 1874, with privilege for
the last named sum on property de-
scribed In the tax bill on file.
A. Bower VS.. w. A. johnson ct al
The decree of the Supreme Court giving
Ave per cent instead of eight per cent
against defendant was filed. Judgment
OF the lower court affirmed, with this
exception.
Antonio Bononio vs. James w. Mar
tina fury case. This Is suit for $500
damages for injuries sustained from
dray Of the defendant. Up to adjourn
ment of the court no verdict had been
Firth District Court.
Present, Hon. Il. North Cullom, Judge.
II. G.. Dunn 4 Co. vs.. II. Dumestre; A.
Vigne VS.. Peter McCreevy. - In these
two cases defaults were entered.
AE.T ,,N IL nt hn
default of the 9TH Of February, 1876,
made final for the sum OF 1854 70.
sixth District Court.
Present, Hon. A. Sauoler, Judge.
Defaults were taken in the following
cases Joseph Curet vs.. Jean Segassie;
scranton. Barney q Co. vs.. New Or
leans. Mobile and Texas Railroad; Jas.
A. Rnynor, Il. v. Morgan vs.. same;
Samuel M. Todd Il Co. VS.. John Chris
tian.
Alexander Levi vs.. s. Oteri IL Bro
Judgment for the plaintiff and against
The defendants In solido, for the sum OF
500. in American silver or its equiva-
lent In United States Treasury notes,
with per cent interest thereon from
l4th Of December, 1875, and costs OF pro-
test.
Goldenbow & Kelley vs.. Captain An
1erSOn ana the OWuelS VI VIC Ddl u
Treydig Judgment for the plaintiff for
the sum Of 1926, with privilege on the
property attached.
Maria Lefevre, wife OF A. Z. Saget, VS..
her husband Judgment Of separation
from bed and board and the dissolution
IL the community Of acquets and gains.
Superior Criminal Court.
Present, Hon. H. r.. Steele, Judge.
Mary Ann Haley, charged with grand
larceny Belle Williams, alias Brandy,
On a charge of robbery, was arraigned
md plead not guilty.
A nolle prosequi was entered in the
Ease of the State VS.. Pat Meehan.
The case Of the State VS.. Alfred
Craps, on q charge Of murder. was on
rial.
The Richmond Dispatch Is q progress
,iye PAPER, and demands that the moss
BACKS keep clear of Virginia's path to
tlory. 1t says: Virginia must adapt
herself to her circumstances. She must
claim her rights. To allow her repre-
,entatiyes in Congress to vote TO keep
ler in her poverty and restitution,
whilst the Northern States are feeding
rom the Federal board and waxing
lat as Jeshurun would be to seal
her own fate and invite amending
in for;ov;tv ~