New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1876-08-01
COURT RECORD.
MONDAY, JULY 81, 1876.
Superior District Court.

William Winklemans W. city of New
Orleans.-Petitione alleges he is proprietor
of the Bismarck Saloon; that he has 90
tanned the consent of the regulate number
OF his neighbors that he should open anc
keep concert saloon; that he has rendered
the amount required for his license out tns
city authorities illegally refused TO receive
it and give him q license and ne 1ears al
attempt will be made to close ms salooI
unless restrained. Injunction issued on
bond of $500
Louis Fishel vs.. P B. p. TOurnOur; same
vs.. Leon Tournour- for possession O1
property purchased at tax sales discount
nued.
George C. Norcross vs.. Philip Kraemor
same W. Widow Mary Locke; same VS.
Widow B. Shsrffer.-Sheritf ordered to
place petitioner in possession OF property
purchased at tax sales.
In re Leon and Pledge Assoclatl0n.-D
Urban appointed liquidator.
In re- suits for possession on tax titles
James Graham appointed curator ad hoe IN
several cases for absent defendants.
Wallace. Carey & Co., We. E. Waggaman
& Co-Petitioners allege ownership OF goods
in store corner of Common and Magazine
streets: that the goods have been seized
and will be sold for $50 Of taxes OF 1876,
due by Wallace & Co.; that the concerns
are separate and distinct. and prays that
the sale be restrained. Injunction Issued
on bond of $1,000.
E. Triplet and C. Turnbull va. keeper of
Parish Prison-Petitioners al.ege they
we're arrested Saturday by unauthorized
persons on an insufficient warrant, and are
now illegally confined in the Parish Prison
and pray for a writ of habess corpus. Writ
made returnable Tuesday, August l, At
Pm.
First District Court.
NoLLE PRosEQU1 ENTERED.
John Janney, for assault and battery
PLEADED GUILTY.
A. Meynier, of assumption.
Petty larceny-Thomas Henry and Annie
Brown, guilty; Mrs Carrie, not guilty
Four tn District Court.
William s. Campbell va. Consolidated
Coal Association. alleges he
was employed by the defendants, cOmposed
of the firms OF W. G. Coyle & Co. w. u.
Wilmot g. Co. and kendig & Co.; that his
salary from October, 1873. to October, 1874,
was $500; that October Is, 1874, he was
employed for q year at $1,000; that his duty
was to pay of employees, and he was accus-
toned to deduct he own pay; that July 81.
1875, he was discharged without cause; that
there was, therefore, $500 due him for the
balance Of the year which he retained; tina
Saturday, July 81, the concern caused his
arrest: that August l he was compelled to
90 to Memphis; that the concern caused his
arrest there; that he could not obtain his
release till he surrendered the $500 due
him; that August he was released, and
that these malicious proceedings caused him
damage to the amount of $500
William Schlechting vs. Michael j. Bren-
nan Petitioner alleges that in September,
1875. defenda mt took advantage of his tenn
porarv absence, under the landlords lien,
TO seize and remove his furniture; that the
deputy sheriff maItreated and assaulted his
wife: that the family were forced to remove
to dilspidsted and infected shsnty; that
one of the children was i'll at the time. and
died from the effects of the election, and
claims &25 900 damages.