The New Orleans Democrat., 1876-05-02
SUPREME CoInr Decisions.

Present Chief Justice Ludeling. Jua-
tices Howell, Wyly and Morgan.
nv THE CHIEF JUSTICE
No. eis6. Q. X. Hawley, Public Ad-
minlstrator. vs.. A. Heyman ct al.-Re-
hearing refused.
No. 6is4. Citizens Bank va. parish oil
Concnrdia. -RehearinR refused
No. 6la5. Mrs. NJ ID. Locke. wife Of A.
Maureau. ys. Laiitte, Dufilho 4; Go.
acting for Marmillion. Reheafing re-
fused
No. e274 City Of New Orleans vs.. Geo.
j.. Bright. Rehearipg granted
No 6i20 Henry Laskey and J. A.
Webert vs. Merchants Mutual In
surance Company. Rehearlng refused
No. COOS State of Louisiana, ex rel.
Citizens Bank. VS. the Funding Board
Hehearing refused
No. 4es2. +. u King VS.. J 2. Dittieh. =
| Rehearing refused.
| No 4s2b John II. Clay vs. Michel A.
Peyroux. appellant. Appeal from Sixth
| District Court, parish Of Orleans. On
appeal-Fortnel decree amended 80 as to
condemn appellant to pay fifty dollars
damages.
| No Eoas. Paul Paincy, appellant, es.
| Mrs. V. g. Burke ut al. Appeal from
! Fifth District Court, parish of Orleans
Judgment reversed and case reInanded
| No bo47 Mutual National Bank of
New Orleans We A Milteuherger Il Go
ct al Mrs q. MltenbergeT. iutetvsnor
aud appellant. Appeal from the Sixth
District Court. parish Of Orleans. In
exeoutory proceedings IL ia competent
Tor n third person. holding u mortgage
on the property seized superior to that
under which the writ issued. to Inter
vene by way of third opposition Judg-
| 4 Il
No G113. J. T. Henry, Sr., vs.. 9. Durie
and !. L. Laresche, appellants Appeal
| from the Fourth District Court, parish
Of Orleans Motion to dismiss refused
No 5957. Jas. Freret vs.. w. w. Hand
| lin. appellant. Appeal from the Sixth
District Court, paris of Orleans. .-Judg
ment affirmed with 900 damages
No Goel. VIM II. Reynolds Va Joseph
Raymond and John Iange Merchants
Mutual Insurance Company. appel liant
| Appeal from Fourth District Court. par
ish IT Orleans. Motion to dismiss re-
| fused
No. etes. A. l.. Guaman, appellant,
vs.. n. u. Hearsey and husband Zoe A
gusnan. wife Of Garig. va. u f. Hear
sey and husband. consolidated Ap.
peal from District Court. parish of East
Baton Rouge These suits are to re-
cover damages which plaintiffs allege
| they failed to recover In n former suit
| by rehsons of defendants fal eiy ans wer-
ing the interrogutOres on faets and ar
tioles. The plea Of no cause of action
Ia well founded Judgment affirmed
No. G2G4 Howard u Preston. appel
lants. va. G. II. Il. Merritt, administfa.
tor. ct ais Appeal from Parish Court,
parish Of St Helena. Judgment af-
firmed.
No. eo44. W. w. Handlin. appellant.
vs.. Jas. Freret. Appeal from Sixth Dis
trict Court, parish Of Orleans. Judg-
No elo7 NJ. WV. Vernon. appellant.
trict Court. parish Of -. Helena. The
shooting for which plaintiff claims dam
ages having been caused, in part. by his
own fault. he cannot recover Judgment
affirmed Justice Morgan dissents.
No. 4727. TeiItonia National Bank.
appellant. VS. the Southern Bank APP
peal from Superior District Court parish
Of Orleans. Judgment affirmed.
BY JUSTICE TALIaFERHo.
tJustice Morgan, in the following
1 cases, read the decisions prepared by
Justice Talaferro)
| No $500 Mrs J.. Cormier. appellant,
VS.. NJ. Soye ct al Appeal from Sixth
District Court. parish OF Orleans. On
rehearing Former decree maintained.
Justice WHY disseDts.
No Gas. City OF New Orleans. appel
liant. vs.. q, w. Dunbar u Son. Appeal
| from Superior District Court, parish Of
| Orleans. Under act u Of 1872. dealers
in goods manufactured by them within
tho State are not exempted from the
| payment Of II license tax levied by the
| city OF New OTleans.-.J Judgment re-
versed
No 1880. NJ. T.. Block vs. A. Bonnet,
appellant Appeal from Sixth District
Court, parish Of Orleans. Judgment
affirmed.
No 578l 2. irwin, tutor, Va. city Of
New Orleans. Appeal from Superior
| District Court, parish Of Orleans On
tice WHY disseDts.
No. Gi54. State Of Louisiana W. Willis
Holmes, appellant. Appeal from Parish
Court, parish Of Natchitoches. A party
who sells drugs or medicines, though he
do not compound them or iii ph ysicians 5
prescriptions, is liable to q license tax as
druggist, the license as u retail mer-
chant not including this class Of goods
Judgment affirmed.
No. 4793. Steamboat Richmond and
owners vs.. L. J. Highly, appellant APP
peal from Fourth District Court, parish
Of Orleans. judgment affirmed.
No. 1897. James A. Farley vs. Samuel
Boyd, appellant. Appeal from Sixth
District Court, paris OF Orleans. judy
ment affirmed.
No. 6Os9 Charles r. Estlin, appellant,
Va. State OF louisiana from
Superior District Court, parish Of Or
leans. Judgment affirmed
No. 6O79. J. Faust, Bro. Il Co., appel
lants, vs. Glynn Il Wintz. Appeal from
Fourth District Court, parish Of Or
leans. Judicial bonds being SOLITARY
obligations, the sureties, on an appeal
bond, are bound IN solidO for the
amount thereof Judgment reversed.
No. COOS. Succession Of John YOU
ennes, W. ). Donnell opponent and ap-
pellant. Appeal from Second District
Court, parish Of OrIeans.-Judgment
affirmed.
No. 1925. Joseph Alexander vs. City Of
New Orleans, appellant. Appeal from
Sixth District Court, parish Of Orleans
~ L. 4 Il