The Hawaiian gazette., 1876-11-08
@urrreru- Csurt OF Cthe wasEau I--
Iuuds-octobcr Tern. 1879.



1l1ln rs poohina AZ thif term Of the Court
1hrr --af va-6iri fsr the plaintiff
-1t a-uur "a far supplies furuisbea to the de-
Eluiursl uiit. who WHs lirinr apart from the de-
fuuisuf. Eridsaus afsrsa 70 show that the wife
-u lrur upsrs from her husband because of his
Ha1--v. ard had cuntinusd to DO 80 FOR long time
Eraaru-- likewise uEsred ta prove that the wife
o. as duieudHut rhlr Hriag apart from her
hursart had comuitsd E5uliry and the defendants
uauu-r uaErz 81 Court instruet the jury that
~ iu-y fud ihat Kspihsa, The woman was justi-
80 g rsHu-usinr from hsr hssbsnd. but that she
b. tr-t treE n Hduitsry. tssy viii hnd for the
6.luuaaui. hi-t irst-uciiou he Court refused and
rrrsrrar ras duIy noted and finally reduced TO
v-alur und allowed by the judge on the 10th Of
o6-ets- a. af uhioA in acoordsnos with the s3sth
s--a1 d[ ihs Cirz Code. And II is alleged that
ll uEuuniiuns NAY not be beard becAuse that If the
1l1t rf lie courl shall be that the ruling should
hars h-ea uHds sslsd. the eject would be that a
-ra uouid a. ordered. and that ull The require
usru ui ne session 1isf ,nsH trial have not been
ra1rlrd v-h- IfuFPsurt that ersry direction indi-
uzlsl tT tht Statuts touching exception 10 the ru-
as a[ lus raurt followed by defendants counsel,
Hul ruuld AElEear by the Terusal o the Sections
- art - uclus.Te, tht, The lIs5th Section Of the
c.rl cads l. uesut ia apply to = different STAGE Of
-tt --ia ttar ~he-s szceptians q ibe ruling or the
lu-t u-t rrrul.-ly and systematically noted during
az rrl- rhs listsh Section is meant to apply to
Haaarr fo- usu trial which may come to the
ia~lsaEs of The party. Say. after the case is gone
l s lF lar instance. Il The verdict is contrary
b. 49,. - ziruu b. the Court. or contrary 70 The
rr1rlr e uEidouos. 81 the jury misbehaved them
s-rcs. ar 80 evidence be discovered. or any other
- lat uuuu-uut oasss for new trial nav be shown.
Al- -ar ~ ans riEhtt of parties under exceptions
t ~ rusrr uf the Csurt a. the trial is distinctly
lal tlu sht Sociout above referred to from ss4
ll s1f ar Instance. II the Cuur, should reserve a
rustln ior she cousidrralou Of the full court as is
Truridsi 5ht SEA sec,isn. il would not be ssri-
easy ruludsd thHt al The provisions Of the II56th
Ssctil- Hulis have hc complied With or again,
e. tit gsssilot shouia Be reserved By the Court on
Hc-,ur uf uthu- party. and the Sssih Section is
uu-s rrsuEucs ~ the remedy when the justice
uhr aaT hold the Court does not see Ct 70 reserve
-t Fai- uhlFt The ss5th Section distinctly enaeis
iats ulsau a-lauanue of tuch exception the oues-
t-us s-,ar lae-sen shall be considered BY the full
raas g bsis~cr nay he the eject Of the ruling by
90 r--. IL szsepaot. The Statute is that the
raa- uuf consider sheu; and the Ssgh Section /
T-uriss So faIout= &. Wbsu Judgment shall have 1
t1l -ra5sses ia any ease ia which exceptions have
tssr aiuvrd. ths Judgement may be vacated BY the /
fl t,ur- ui-houi any writ Of error, in like manner
a. E 9. hal beon entered by mistake. and thereupon
Hzs rlser fraoseainrs SHAH be had in the case, as
't ~ ans j1s;ius shall upportnin'' The defendant
g. 80 F-esert bic exception Tor allowance until is
ar-r afr- verdict -eade-rd. Ii is true that by SO
talur b Eutisoled himself 10 the chance that the
lllu,f Eluld sats ont execution on the completion
G zen lHys aueu-dEHSs with the ll55th Section Of
Or c.Fl Code. and shis might have subjected him to
a. iuuauruuieuus g moring for = stay execution,
- e. g j.. Be appears 70 be rseius IN curiA-
CHas. G. HsEEIs. Justice. ofthe
A. IEAScgs JUbn, Supreme Court.
s. b. Dele for plaintiff. Preston a Meculy for
5t5erEart
uuuoiuIu. October e. 1876