Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1876-06-21
Love vs. Hayoook; decree for sale; M. H.


without prejudice to the rights Of the defend
ats to ennrce their li"ns.
Charles King VS.. A. Walker administrator,
&C.; decree for an acc 'uDt.
j. Harris, &C., vs.. 0 led Harris, &C.; decree
for assignment of dover and partition OF real
estate.
Suite & Stewart vs.. CostegaD; decree for &C.
count of liens,
Com. VS. w. R. MILAN, &c decree for sale;
H. w. Thomas commissioner.
+. 0. Powell Il Co. vs.. Geo. W. Hunter
administrator, &C.; decree confirming report of
.mmissiooer of sale aud for distribution OF pro.
cerds 10 bis hands.
Lydecker VS. H. Wheeler; decree to rent GU
property; Thomas Moore com missioner.
Alfred Moore and wife vs.. W. ii. SeWall,
&c; decree for further settlement OF account
of Thomas Moore, administrator, and an &C
count Of advanccments.
Gunuclps administrator vs.. Corowell, &c.;
decree confirming private sale made by lhos
Moore, commissioner and for further account
of debt.
John Johus vs.. U. w. Barker; order set
ting sale aside aud for resale
Orrison's aimlnl.trat vs.. Orrlscn, &c; Or
der for the settlement of administrator &C
count.
y. II. Darker w. u. II. Dallo", uootoe oou
6rmiug sale.
Mills VS.. Mills; decree for an account of debts
and liens
CoakIy vs. Mary Allison, &C.; rule to show
cause why the executor Of Willis Henderson
should DOT pay to the widow OF john Allison
the Interest on certain tund.
Whites administrator vs. Elser, &C.; order
for an account.
Dorrelj v. D ,rrelI; decree for divorce vio-
culn matrimoDii.
john Underwood ". Harrison, S.; decree
confirming sale and deed to De executed upon
payment Of proceeds.
Thompson W. Oliver; decree appointing trus
tee for Sarah Oliver and to pay over tunds IN
| hand.
James Madison vs.. VIM. Collins; dismissed
agreed.
John R. Pugh VS.. R. H. CockerilIe; decree
for sale of } r. Pughs real estate; II: W.
Thomas, R. H. Cockerie and Thomas Moore
commissioners to make sale.
Coleman w. Jackson; decree for sale; K. h.
| Cockerille aud Thomas NJ lore commissioners
| of sale.
Crump, Sc, vs.. Sias d. Trip; order to pay
funds into the hands Of the receiver OF the
cou I.
Newman VS. Turberville; decree to rent cut
|
Mar;iu Pcddle and Hammock VS.. Nevett; or
der revviug suit against heirs Of Thos Nevctt
deceased, aud recomnittal to commissioner for
further report 1T liens.
Stabler VS.. Quander; decree revlVing suit;
confirmation OF sale.
| w. Henderson vs. Rid; Albert Stuart sub
| stituted commissioner of sale.
Cruup and wife VS.. Taylor; NJ. H. Wells
substituted commissioner of sale.
j. NJ. Flrfax VS.. Caleb Stone; decree re-
committing account.
Jobn T. Boxhau VS.. R D. Cats, &C.. W.
| D. Corse made party defendant
Jones vs.. Fowle; decree c,u6rming report of
| account OF sales; that the purchaser of the land
is liable for the amount of his purchase paid to
commissioner who failed TO bond aud decree
| for resale ualess the amount due Is paid 10
| ninety days.
Haislip VS.. Kerby; decree by consent ior re-
sale; Thomas, Ball and Moore commissioners.
| Ross administrator vs. Ross heirs; decree
for resaIe Thomas Moore commissioner.
Jones executor vs. FoIlins' executor; decree
| for resale unless payment of purchase money
due be made in sixty days; Thomas Moore com-
| missioner.
GuuneII VS.. Saugster; rule against purchaser
| and order for account.
Kidwell vs. George w. Cauuoo; VI. H. Wells
appointed commissioner of sale ia conjunction
with NJ. D. Ball.
Mason, &C., vs.. Lamb &e ; decree appoint
! ing com uissiooers to make partition of land in
| proceedings mentioned.
woodward vs.. woodward; decree for accou It.
s. Strong VS.. N. Hanoa; decree for further
account of Iieus &C.
Huuer vs. Riley; decree directing the pay
meDt of s44.9S of costs Of improvements, t Of
costs of suit to be paid by the life tenant aud
$434. 96 aod of costs Of suit by Allen e. Har-
mon, administrator Of VIM. Bie's, and order
for the settlement of the administrators ac-
count.
Ball vs.. Ball; decree for resale and partition
Of the lands of which Martha q. Ball died
seized.
Selectman vs.. Corbett; order confirming par
ttion.
Chichester vs.. Chichester; decree confirming
sale aud for distribution of proceeds.
w. Powell vs. NJ WorsteD, &c; decree re-
vivng suit against the heirs of Richard HRS,
deceased; overrung the petition of j. f. Hlrst
to be relieved of his purchase; dismisslng petl
ton of Martha Smith for additional dover;
rule against Joho h. Hirst to show cause why
he should not be required to pay note: the
same due audi become due on his purchase,
and decree Tor resale of land of Il chard Hurst.
Simpson vs. Ra,cliff"; decree tor sale; h. w.
Thomas and Thomas Moore com ulssoners.
Peach vs.. Barker; decree permitting q. w.
Wattles to pay over to Thomas Moore, com-
m ssioner the amount in his bands as former
| commissioner Of sale.
Thomas F. Lee vs. Monroe, g.; decree con
6ruiug report of partition aud for sale Of the
1T of land set apart to the estate OF Henry
Monroe; j. NJ. Love aud Thomas Moore com,
N ss!oners.
Sutherland VS.. Denty; decree confirming
commissioners report, aud judgment for con
pIainauts for the SUN S73 IA with interest 90
s37 Is, the principal sum, from 10th May,
1876, aud costs.
Watkins VS.. Watkins; decree substituting +
L. Smith, jr., commissioner 10 the pace OF ID.
L. Smoot, who declines.
BayIess VS.. Bayess; reference to commits
sioner to ascertain and report who arc the heirs
and their ages Of Bayless deceased.
Ann Foth vs.. Harriet Turner; decree for au
acc lit.
Summers vs. Powell; leave given to purchaser