, 1876-01-17
HuRD VS.. Brown.

THE CHARLES AND SPECIFICATIONS.
Following is IN atstracl OF tho chargoH pre-
lerrod against Audlov J. Brown BY Dir. nura,
Saturday evening, which failcd to roactt this
odlco In eeaaop for publication iu Sundays Ia"
Eue. ..
70 the Rtr. J. y. Ien'~or'h, ,astar a. the Frat
signed, Harvey u. llurd. n,.sGter Of taI church,
aceusea and complains uE Andrew J, Drowli, mem"
ba1 Of shs sa,ne s1urchsaa s ~ inIo%.: ,.:. r.ou
twetn the l.ih and art days If Dtrelcf. 4. D. 1915;
with intent dcfllus aud ntuss tls ri44sac:sr and
LEA amons . lbs a neiesS Ct Tho s.id eAur:h. aud
generally among tbs topls IN ths County of Cook.
ae e seysn.* sn; 1niai pisr!:t If .ha stass q ill.,
noie' aud aso caused the to 10 published In TIM
ph!tsgo iha, y 1ints newspaper I,!si!shtd tn sno
Ety Ut Chicago, Anl Of general circulation. c1Atan-
tng certain llse aua malicious ISLANDERS VI anu con.
tcTutnx the complainant, tt~wit:
[TneFa ttn specifications ulGt thiA CHARGE e.th
based uron dastent allegations nale IN tbs pImph:t
rtferfrI to- fso.n which liborat quotations 1ildo.l
,,sass ps sa IN 'e hs It'll.
lh!rd fourth, nh aud sixth sreeheatsons to thc hsbt
rusrse, tho s4fa Audsow ]. Brown haa in each Csc
report shcroof ouiug .1h Iarls iheruof nv are u.
snruba to tho complainant, aud tlorety Ev!na false
rUloEinH 10 tbs def4nAn ot tho eh.t4eser aud fepu-
tation Of sha Cumpainhnt
7hlrI CAarpt-'raat under tho prttsnla Of giving
Is sn i u tSs e ~
lorted 10 II Irole Reports. rnEo k"td Andrew J.
1roWn LAS given falAc anu untrlthfu Accaube thera-
Of to Tho detamaton OF this complainant III tha to-
biccihcation l. In hts quotations ret fotth Ia tho
an as5s ss ~ dat xa
md sentences which quslfy aud gsaa unsrcnt to4a-
fo,.rta Chargc--That tho said Antzsw ]. Brown has
~1fuly aud falsely DETAINED thu complainant tn pub
shny. a!ortsaia each anI every OF thu statements
te fos III ta' 'pecacaona 10 Tho as1t charge abofe
FyM Gaarse-That the said Andre* J. nso.n ha.
iIs tims b. has bsta 1astnuer q Lid clursa.
AItA CharGt-1hat tbs sad Audrpw ]. llsoxn Las
ponductel him.elf tna malicious aud uusArlatlan
Hpocihcation i. In not making known hia grievances,
II any he Ind, 70 tts CHURCH in thu manneE lsin.od
gpedacatioa Z. IN seellny to artngo bis supposed
wrongs by tho pnbllcaslpnt mentioned tn tho ta!i
Is,aa arst brought III. gsiersnrss to taa sssenon Of
tAs proper authorities Of said church.
Sftt,lh CAutse-1bas the said Andrew J. Drown hss
beeo guilty of violating biz agreements With This
spesae.t!on l. Having rurehaacd on secount Of shs
benson. 3is Aests ot land uow constituting Ill tha!
ratt Of the o1!gusl plat u Eyausson lstne West ol
iii .nd I'll. conplsn.ns. snl F. ii: Bsason. asteatul
10 the Northwestern University = writteu agestncn
70 Etse to ons.th,zd tho nst pronts IT,. sAoalt
tsctus FROM hs purcb1Aa sad sails Of said !4nl an4
lract t.s then having beou divaded tuto oIa
1871. IL s.id Brown ss1<sd 10 fuln thu said sgrse
ueat, and IN confederation Of sid agreement TIL
.olAllslnsnt SLOWED hiA 10 sst4iu ILL, tl1 complain
susG, part at tai3 net prohs., thcu aaccstx!net
hss siuec, ~ ths incttas. In .aus os said Land. b.
CONS Of uusi! grcAtat value yes tbs said nEeTu h4
~ or 10 this complainant, but s,4 retains the Same
,nd lxnotea sssa contract With tho sau University ant
Nils complainant,
Specification 4 In that The s..d Andrew j. Brown
u hn President Of the Uuiou Bank, In tin Jeaz A.
1855 lB3t. agreed with tAls complainant tAsN Til
nuplAinAn& would PAT eeEta!n calls Upon tho stock Q
- Chicago. IT. Charles + Nisstaslppl Air Hns Hail