New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1876-06-23
ALABAMA CLAIMS DECISION.

WASHINGTON. ID. c.. June 22.-ln the Conr t0 OK D,
q of A SoaS s s ease q rsec
and Otto AGAINST the United states a was as IL
points have probably never ,nSn r nSr Hscset Of
ri, 4 s yp sSa c Fss tl'f esmsp s lain
ants John A. creswel for me % star owned by
ARE Ss rs s MaSms Bsh India in T
IgGS ia s@arch o. freignt Alter cargo was OF pgA
sShs@ g. T ,s . Sn ID s a q & fS Hr
cargo beard e master shsd p Who aed The
M 70 The SD 9 5,r Co CO. hs eiamsns
nesPor and az ne ,ms ro o ' ss AMI burned
Alabama Dee a. 1865 winch Day aud osoF' 5e S CO..
the !ssf and had Ia received the bill ianr
great question Is on the Tsn s e. i lam mne The pres
en- law ,hese camanls being alien. VINO o Of ta:
resided within he Un1ed he dnsS a, The ySluc Of The
wei the sse 1md .Tg Ava and that tie
owners a. British residents made claim fr % d., liz
for Ills Sss S on d so, i on Vat tie Mara6a lime o.
DISTINCTION was carrying the British hae Iheir claim , was
oral o. india hat proofs showed that at ,hs time
S Ann The Judge says. however, 10 base
del upon What oe,nIrr az uSgy 70 loo" into t!c
act Cougre and gnless TIE esse OF hSis r lam even ven
il tls yalne Of that cargo wa Pi ~ " T ao
ia t5at the caruo vas placed her before assuming 'e
4 seus ard then asserts tJa 'he oAliIhs 80 MI e
t then, mn T,der the terms Of the act" , 80 ,
Referring the exclusions ad @ o. ~ q, fri,
tie at ihe 1la n pCii Pspamin v.st adjust
counsel or iho nri states ovcriuG, AMI the right
On Foreigner to protection in The premises ana
70 recoy any loss sustained AMI Proved go ig ~
In he syl bs was heh LA es Pr Of iorci.n bra
Whether pAiualized or unnataIaiAei except W. suy 81
T re- i i, tr n l,neth in Complimentary terms 20
ta raopng n TIE former g ta e5n Mhc "a.
Pronounced early period % me curt s So ~
ms of foreign Iii d. rot naina!z and ~ 10y gase
shoci los, nnicr proyogs o Ne act except IN thg
nltveborn subj cts 81 Ua man; 80 ~ ~ Gam,
ant noi naiyeborn seet Of Great ifitan bad so} or
boar % ar American vessel which was ds'io,s ~ We
cr SOS we have given hin aGgment Tor re .aie % we
s"1 si ~ K,rl,Sn neoIss;eni with true allegiance
es further eaholins niIh ne r- 5S oa mon
s "Cosing Z IL csgss e9noG "a , Ti mo o ar
sAa b. made IN favor Of any 1r,n %1 w s asat
IiotS ,3n a. =, rvs p I'D agSrlt The Confcieracy; and
that he entitled 10 such protection as asens o
le dt "s Ig'ic safes no San recover in this
court" TIE opinion then proceed, - show tai BeGsr VS.
not Bniish n2lcc s si, ~ 'T which b. cJtauel
in British ns on en him @ cog ~ pr ,is;es W I t99t
w. ~ p5i%Ta1Ptan in tho Brit Dominion, show
country lis original NATIONALITY woaid waive: mi t h
Majesty without iueGrr0g the guilt OF ,reason These
l das ~. - to Eel cSnd5a Of Never we 90 not
thns hr-cours within ne Iinei2o ".h no., ne brn,
fsof te ia' under which ge sc We 'T.iI, ~ o. , t
which they have proved Judgments i9E i'e ,tr
lasens nom the oIloa Of the cofrt " d considerable safp
ur., and determined IeasJnlt =. ihr reasoning ~
tir Judge wa, % tLr Tia-r nptioa that me Mart
aban was an American ahp, but ln TIE baith'r
II lis ,pfyI1u. quoting u the proofs. he tak'r
The crnra thai she was l'iiis e. and nom thit -l
rEt sis tie nnl ir.hs t' 10 al me o. g , ~
isrsp, 10 recover Lon, ih~ iiulntS hit uo vt
r.,rt-tr4tsn tc rlIrIt rDf the vessel h ia' lfi
af;crtIOu-' To- liuf nom ih'f ih'A
81 furress n u!on the british b"''Ihh'
CrrGld f'arn" that 'Ho natural aaron
of Never So. .rU.lariy. bad .s "cn 'ii ilu Juls !"
. ~ v 80 rcr- e" nfd tAn
n the aisrle" o sltsfaCors reasons fF ""'nS 90 ne
~ 1. lr O. tg.su ir conflict Ft decision oi
tii, ycuft aliff elaborate and Watu consideration