, 1876-09-08
THE COUNTS.
Another Board Of Trade Case.-An
Interesting Point to Be
Decided.
Tho War Of the Street Hallway Compa-
nies.-.Tho Metropolitan Va.
West Side.
Partnership Troubles In the House OF
Gushing, Warren & Co....A 1sc'
cciyer Wanted.

William 7. Dakcr, Waller F. Cobb. and 0urdon
q. Moore, copartncss NJ w. r. Bakcr h Co., com.
mission merchants on tho Board of Trade, flnd n
bill yesterday In tho Circnt Court nsatnst tho
Board Of Trade, its President, md nonrd Of Di.
rectors. asktnR for m Injunction. Aftor giving
tho usual statistics In regard 10 tho baIncas Of tho
persons WIN exc out living through rOtscaston NJ
a membership ticket In II. the eonplalnauts state
tbat In December taat they sol and agreed 10 DO
liver 10 F0ss, Elliott d TO. 1000 bushels
nf corn At q certnln time for Tho price
Of 4GA cents 4 bushci. Tho time for
the delivery wns Just the date Of tho
elimination Of tic December corn Com.
ptaiuants fatlng 10 deliver. FOES, Elliott Il Co.
demanded Its 1alue at tho time. This comp1afnhnta
rcfnscd to pay, but agreed 10 give tho difference
between the contract price md tho reaI value Of
tho corn at tue tmu for shipment, Of "a shown by
other markotS or for manufacturing rurposcs In
the Chicago market. Foss, Elliott j. Co. declined
to receive this amount, and offered 10 subnlt tho
oGer ia turn was declined by nalsor i Co..,
on the ground that both tho Committee Of
sy sn S n e" Ct yeo i
s sesa aa es fs IT aSs anaer
Traae II y Which a. H. Whit aeorss Il &C. os,
n. Il. Fatrhank, 8. 4. Rent, and Edson Kci,h
were ehosSn ~ spseIal committee To- decide thu
s eedea ahat { @ e,
sncs between 4oA eents and 4a cents per
pay. slso, liz costs q tie tiia!. acompainants
pls3d ta,c costs. and rendered $o:,ha to Fuss
1870, to thc Committee Of Appea!s. On the same
ay aa aso spesea poi1se tbs same
ting Mp thnt tho Committee OF Appeals had no
!l.sdistlon a. tho!t casc Wss not m appeal ffom
the cowmten ,ao of tni S
outside OF The Arbitration C9mm!ttee that
aa there Eas 70 provision f9r m
s'S aa .of s.e aFss hst ssw
dhs case was s sosta'nea Sy luz pe;n meaning g. OF
sssca C he same orce @ az tai Of
...regnlar committees, respeetlycly," Thc objec-
,o's werS nc"evee Ias ana ,Sa tEe Go III.
semp!a1'snis cor p s 49sS Msds sae!sst psets:t which,
Was aso oysrr1e4 ann aef!flon giVGa tnn5 s COM
Rla'nnns so9 f RsJ EGs. En,t s1.i co o''o
Baker CO. With tl'e lsoas3 81 Directors. nnd lle
aWa.a q tne % u ro *"a4 We ~ ,sn.
Ssss sIs!as nsse IT. tSsy ;5sS5 5 seS!sst IT.
gam ' & thS eosf - A'Gs sI na9 az uesn ,n
aeotof Sst Complaint sgains III 1T eolpananss. % a4kas @
f2f t!e,E expulsion 1of efeaEag tao,f in1sh IN hoI
chilling " taG awafa Or tnv GoMmsae e. a. fhey
/ A-" -
inx fcsolntlonh:
&
y,SsSa s;s OF tue OF submission signed y ts
I;tSoetd Tint iii the opinion Of this Hoard ". T.
iss: s Sss Hs sts't
bask IT, 5g t. fS EI o of bs .u
jecs sc postponed two WceEs
noy S f va va wecKs saye % eo se
~; ni + Iii r. ~ Smxr.MI % ~ nrr"I ,n.,n
ffom the isonrd ~ Tic n,rnort of tho rcaplutionS
IL 10 tccenu,cnd such action, Thcy thcreiosc asE
nn ~ ~" crDniny ~ .ttcmnt3un to oI cx
nj them. iru the Doasi Il Tfaic; or in any ,nSi.-
scr hinIcrinn them in tictr business thurs. or in
=. ,sI NAMES NJ NJ si9 i'satd 'Ds'
nnuiicoiIon .vn, t,n,ned,atc,v maae Yesterday
n,nr,nr !" in,lac William. fnr }eWnnsnfy Ininn:
tinn III nastnnned mill Tmesdnv. scpt liz IN
9snants to- On g eoo a tn n @
made X NJ g$td q pIssSsa siS e1pf!n
VIII Da5tes for eomplaInaus. ind Mesyss uens IL &
Dsjsk ior tbe board Il Traic. N - N'' D>~''>o
After tryIne its luck in ths United stutcs
circait is cStf c3Sartf and m In Ia tie lie county conrt oi
SeoE County @ c lie nnioi!unsts @ N, Met!oeSi1,aa
way r S1SeS bv @ 5 aaamst tba h
caga | wei WvIsIoa hasIwsy i COMPANY. TGv Iii
ea''SS ena WEI aG faitsenh srea but nj wa .opud
Fostcr ~ an aif Il ~ 81 ibo Wes, Iys1o awSy
Compa'ny. tCS' " 0S"+"' " 'D' "'"' D''':' .A'""''
noWn modIhed ths iuiunct,on So ~ "a allow % Tho
tIss;t' cat iss,ly.v tn fsY fsir 1vts
~ H. ~" ~ Xxx NM, Eama s,ccs IN lh sfs,s
a sa spseo Go fc1 na asco r.
aEo 9aestms 1tHn III ,hs WG,c tctn H ~ ~
cnnS'r ~ s. ~ ,hfs liz Srer ~, nr.,e11 III Il h..
IT.. WILL 1Gs e.. wv o "1 n t!acs"n
@ S , a1 USt as a' III ,c H.
NE" Mvnt .,ms ,n.v Xiii |ntnI.s % a. nrviirc in
nn,ss' snns ~ s;raai Htt,Ssc W"st nEr csnnI
LoSG ee LAKE sL,eS, c ~ 4 *
n99 mess fnt ~ ~ !, in 70 e,vm r.
~ tass ,e ~ H. ~ NJ
bsn Is psid % canaot 10 sx1eea On, and Complainant
ss sueS e e 5e' sfeos @
n,,,o,o GusNy, Hnshts ni XII H. ve,t.,aav IN
the Circuit C9uTt AGAINST ~ ptttners, NIt.an u:
ana caar,ea g e TaLfm aLn e'SWg .ns
August 1874. compin!naat, nefs dHt III oWnel
Of the right TO mAnuiaciufc aMa set N on'o' hcs..
l VHnUE&AEG.