, 1876-11-28

S'IAH nItHAlN UC ftUtlt ENN CfEE DcGn
passed.. 4 similar condition In Tho same chap
ter, directing contraetots who performed work
which wAs to bo pnttl for by special a.tctstnont
10 look 10 that assessment only. for payment,
n such why, but having. no penalty attachcll,
had lcch held by tho Supreme Court to bc
merely directory and not mandatory. II that
condition was merely directory, tic require
jncnt As to the appropriation In The present In
stance stou'd be considered as directory. Both
were similar In camractcf,-thc construction OF
tic two should be alike.
TIE UNION ELEVATOR.
Wheeler, aeo;go t. dunlap; 4. st. jioytt Theo.
.lorc !. llustcti, Leonnrf liazcltine. e. W.
Wheeler. ]. Il. Mckay, and Perry II. Smith,
owncss OF three.9nartcr Interest Ii, the Union
Court nga!nst TIC chcago, Burlington i Quincy
Railroad Company, George Armour and Albert
4. Munger to restrain llic Company from tcar-
Ing up etde-track which connects tho Union
Elevator With Its main track near the Sixteenth
The comTlainants slate that they own three
quarter interest I'm tho elevator, atlu that tho
defentlants Munger and Armour, own the re-
' 5 astss Sa ai ifxssss i sss ss on sp S%pss,sT ssss
tho Chicago, burlington d Quiuey Railroad
trick, being connected Herewith, by {. short
sac'traek. Thts connection has existed for ton
yeats, Though tho Company lIas not been IN the
at Irregular intervals. This cause has been TINT
Armour d Munger own tho Burlington Elevator,
whose interests arc adverse to those OF the Union
Elevator, md therefore, though I,aylnga sharc IN
tho latter. lave besn endeav0rinx to prevent II
from getting o fair share Of business. Armour
Is also a stoekhuldes III the Chicago, Burlington
IL Quincy Raitroal, and tic defendants to-
venting grain from being delivered At COM
platnautsf elevator.
Tho complainants lcnecfortli propose to insist
GIT their legal rights, ard compel the road to
bound to do. They, however, fear tint II they
make any demands OF this nature the Company
Will Immediately tear up the track and 1eavo
them helpless, hs wns done IN 180S, when tho
iaS er Tas s,sst iaksa qp es se, , : III, a but Fs 70
done, as tho Company has threatened, they
asked for m injunction to prevent my such NJ
tept,% md and T. W. e granted BY Judge Williams
ROW uErwasN TWO sr1a1ruAL1srs.
=, Ebenczcr V. Wiseon, who claims to bo a eplr-
ituaitat lecturer nnd medium, commenced suit
Yesterday agatnst Stevens 8: Jones, proprietor
q tlle Itosophteal Journal, TO- recover
namlc. Mr.. Wilson says ho has always been a
good, upright, virtuous married man, but that
the defendant has lual[ciously on divers
occasions In tho Journal accused him OF
s an eesesns aossas 'q Il feets1; ss'ffs %
The plaintiff thinks Is too grare charge to bo
allowed to pass unnot!ced. Ifo denies tint such
Is THO fact a,ld calls on Mi. Jones to provo 1t, or
WALLACE rs. WALLACE.
Mrs. Celia g. Wallace commenced suit in
ttespass agalnst her former husband, John 8.
Wallace, to recover e1oo 900 damages, Tho suit
was' however. suppressed until yesterday to OBJ
rted to him Feb. :,s 1876, and in April, 1872 OBJ
taEned a divorce on the ground Of cruelty. Since
that time, however, hc has either directly or
through hired accompltces continued to annoy
and moiest her. mud her present suit is to re-
cover damages for such troublo and persecution.
UNITED sTATEs COURTS.
". y. Webbcr began a suit for $4,000 against
A. J. Cooper and William II. Stevenson, md
The United States brought autt IN debt for
s, 800 damages agninst Andrew Cochran, r. P.
liatchfns, and N. 3. Derrick, mud nnotter for
$500 agalnst ths Lake shors Dlsti'l!ng Com-
sSs WsSber sesaa a sill l. far esi against
Charles S:llWarfz, anuthcr for 81 500 alsalnst
!. 4. = Fischer, aud third for $1,000 against
Lln--. ~..--.entl,a1.
HANKRuprcY MATTERS
In the matter Of Ransom j. Morse, an order
was entered requiring tho Assignee to sell Ger
tain jcwelry worth about &4,O00 whlcl, had been
redeemed from Judge Yum II. Higgins at s. pr
cent Of tho inventory price.
turua6ic Dcc. 10.
:. An Assignee will be chosen at II o'clock To-
day for tho estate Of E. A. Bigelow g. Co.
Tic compoattton-fncctfug Of Charles II. pfai-
fer will be held at 10 q. m. to-.Iay.
Tho adjourned ompo6ttor-taoctlng In tho
case OF the Crystal Lake PckIIng mud Prcscry-
Ing Works is set for 2 2: III. To-day.
Frederick F. r. Mueller began suit In attach.
ment against John n. 4ccElBt to recover s, 90.
against j.. Frank Richmond, Edward 4. Cum Cum.
1nings, and D, j. Moore.
In the estate Of Matthew Maghan the will was
Maghan, undcr bond for 81, 900.
TUE oAL1.
JUDGE DRuMMoNp-Tho Wcst~Stde Gus case
JunaE BLoDoETE-la3 to end Of calendar.
No. 12l, Heck vs.. pttshure, Cincinnati 4 81.
L9nts 4iss nstlroa GomPssnssys sS% Se trs no
Jotys yuDoE moons@ cor - I" T. ss Il. No. 49, Noble vs.,
J6poh NoaERsA74to 900, inclusive. No case
JUpon Doo7n-5ss 5ss to e1o, inclusive. No
> Jupan McA1Iasrsn-sot cases 574 and 575
i9so, 10 Ii l557. iiS5 i1so, 1iol, lsl5 isai, ias
JUDGE FAhWsLL-No call.
JUDGE WlIL1AMs-No Gull.
...... JUDGMENTS.
SUPERIOR CouRT-CoNFEss,1Ns-Law g.
Pepper ys. Elaha s. and Philip lNalawn.th, S1a,-
ta5:--W. N. A1oy Va. Danlol J. Mccormick,
Junds JAxEaoN-John Mlllar VI. Catherine NIL.
laF; $U1Q.
ctIgulr counr-JupaH RooEns--F. u. Nellis
y, Albert and Auyu,t Grgndea; verdict, ,s4ia is
Aanrtce Crowley; verdict, 3l6.
JuD9z llo2Tl!-SsIalt Mahcr VI. Chicago, Alton
4na motion fos now tidal b. both rurtics.-Jacob
So!twAy ". 4. !. Coz; vnri!ct S1:tO. 10. and mo.
t!on Tor now tr!al.-J. :, Waterman Va. Lonten C.
NEownull: vardict, 5000. w. Il. uend et al W.
orvi!n olcott; TeFdict, $3.50. 70.-StIljAm seycttn
~. Edward and John Good, $l04.T4.
J UuoE McALLssrEn--Esihcr Yyrna ~. ". F.
Noys and g; +. Mould; verdict $500, and motion
CANADIAN NEWS,
8ptcto1 nispatch TO 1As 1tibHA&
TORONTO, Nov. 21-A rule utsi was granted
this morning against tho Hon. George Brown, As