The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-03-11
THE COURTS.


nwvardict was for the sum Of 200
Tnt interest Mt eight per cent.
wlM WIZ Lewis vs. New Orleans, st
n nv and Chicago Railroad Company
Iou', Central Railroad Company vs.
llin,, The above cases were called or
sspeS.,on to appoint a receiver. John
'ITamnbell, Esq, Semmes IL Mott
Tor complainants; Charles f.
Eqqatchead. ESQ, for the Illinois Cen.
WI and +. u. Simonds, Hays Il New
W.T. G. Walthall, Esqrs., for the de-
enaa ants. When, after hearing argu
l eaut Of counsel, the Court took time to
sa''0yi United states District Court.
present, Hon. L. G. Billings, Judge.
r accordance with general order No
= IN bankruptcy, Judge Billings has
;'.cnsted the Louisiana National Bank
o y ,he depository Of all sums received
T. the assignees and the clerk OF the
" u!lurt on account of any bankrupt case.
wiol write vs.. schooner Geo. Hawk
i. IRA this matter, the report OF the
HMsvmnissionor was modified, and thus
W VaSi6ed was approved by the Court.
y the matter OF George w. Miller vs..
... !. Flirt and tackle. The sale
ssssIn by the Marshal to George L..
q parrtz was approved by the Court and
~! hv, tItie to said vessel ordered to said
UNIT The Court made an order re-
MING the previous orders Of this Court
w - The appointment Of an official as
.ssrse IN bankruptcy also the previous
s .s'or n this court requiring deposit
y Ia IN cases Of CONVERSATIONS OF the
%sscounts OF assignees.
superior Criminal Court.
present. Hon. II. II. Steele, Judge.
MA Grand Jury brought In a finding
.,ainst = - for wilfully and mali
s ,fcrsly setting fire to u house, and ca
MA uiss was ordered.
w r. Joyce, arraigned on the charge
q hreaking into a store In the night
vme and grand larceny, plead not
YAM lanes Foley, arraigned on the charge
4 assault and battery, plead guilty OF
s.sault. which plea WAS accepted by the
Dstrict Attorney.
lain Garyey and Charles Earle were
A,oucht to the bar, and Chas. II. Luzen
SsrC Esu.. attorney for the prisoners,
~ Ma rule for new trial, and made
ana remarks touching the confession
Mich went to the jury, and especially
,hst the verdict did not correspond to
shs Indictment that It was murder, or
ihs prisoners were innocent; that there
rera no extenuating circumstances, no
sndden ARRAY, and that, on this ground
slone. he would ask for a new trial.
INN Judge thought that it was not the
rart 81 the defense to object to the ver-
1ict that the jury must have consid-
srsd' that when the parties went to the
konse OF the deceased they did not in
iand 10 kill. etc. The motion was over
ruled. and the prisoners remanded to
Mt their sentence.
william Florence, on his own plea Of
rilty. was sentenced to pay a fine OF
n ma costs, or, in default Of the same,
3 Ten days Imprisonment In the Parish
Prison.
Wynne Rogers, Esq, presented his
&ploma as a lawyer, and was admitted
tcbractice In this court.
], Kerrigan and Jack Lee were tried
ms charge OF assault and battery, and
ipund guilty.
nmeo, charged with carrying concealed
wagons, and State vs.. Robert Williams,
sAsfged with shooting with q dangerous
Mspon, nolle prosequis were entered,
md the court adjourned till next Tues
&y.
Present, Hon. b. Il. Lynch, Judge.
Richard Malver VS.. Frederick Rup-
wtt Judgment was for the plaintiff In
ie sum Of 500.
Nathilda and Numa Lacoste, her hus-
Mnd, VS.. Thos. 2. McDavltt. Rule
hken herein to release desk and iron
NE seized under a provisional seizure
W. made absolute, and the Civil Sheriff
ddered to release them and return them
y the premises whence they were taken.
]. Fisk VS.. Lena Seip ct al. The rule
hken herein by Il. L. Parker, Public
Administrator, to quash execution and
nlease funds was made absolute and
Ne execution under which moneys were
Ath In the Louisiana National Bank
NJ Quashed and said funds released.
George G. Norcross vs. ID. ID. Gibson.
l was ordered that the rule filed on
January 10, 1876, to be recognized as
purchaser OF property described In
plaintiffs petition, was discharged, the
same having been taken before the ex-
piation OF six months after the adjudi-
alton Of property to plaintiff.
Fifth District Court.
hsent. Hon. Il. North Culiom, Judge.
Jno. M. Rhobock VS.. Augustine Fagot,
III Wife. The default Of the .28th OF
|hhuary, 1876, was made final, and 1t
IN ordered that there be judgment for
lie plaintiff, decreeing a divorce ma
|hmonii between the said parties.
John G.. Ryan vs.. j. Gueydan.-The
|ahult OF March z, 1875, was made final
|tthe sum of 1851 20, with eight per
|Mt interest per annum on $135 IS from
|lprl %, 1874, and on 1896 IS from May
LISA.
Felix Rien VS.. Joseph Krieger ct al.
ne default of the 9th inst. was made
nal In the sum OF $807 SO, with eight
E cent interest per annum on $3.50
hon December 6, 1875, and like inter-
g on 1855 from September the 4th,
Hn. Widow e. Gemdoz VS.. st. Leon
estez and r. H. Schmidt. default
the 9Th inst. was made final in the
an Of $2S74, with eight per cent inter
per annum thereon from Dec. IL,
G IS cost Of protest, etc.
.s.S. Porter ct ais VS.. John NJ. San
Soee-A suspensive appeal was al
esed the plaintiff herein, on their CIV
bond in the sum Of $500.
sixth District Court.
Present., Hon. A. Saucer, Judge.
aAAnase Petit VS.. Louis G. Wilkin |
. wife. The default Of the 9Th inst. |
made final in the sum of 1854, with |
Sut per cent interest thereon from No