The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-06
COURT NOTES.
u,,,.s s,.,., t,,ren,t c,mrt.

United states Circuit Court.
WIN. Bonner yssthe city 81 New Orleans ct ais;
t hne Nam S ws T,s r ref u homer
EST, attorney for the. plaintiff, the teauing OF
said ugmept was delerrf ~. nti . n9M moaa w
Light Company came up on DEMURRER iilhd by
Judge. senlmes, repfesenting the Concentrated
aas af ~ is % The ars MS "U
crossing when our report closed
The much -ta!ked-oi ,telegtaps FROM the Yves!
Len produced by the telegraph companies
.l'hey are awaited with great Interest, Ill,
M Thompson vs. steainer dreat H ,sl
ton TO the masters report was continued I'LL the
W. Es MS u \ !, 4 81 jos andper rule Tor
new trial herein wns called. Eustis and Lazarus
for plaintiff, and }. T. Kramer for mower. new
II, Tie case d Eustis ct al vs. John Bosel
new trial was refused.
John Lssy Mrs i Louisa ,,s hore .,, g a RI
ks s'n r Hpwe Prsniiss vs. New orsans
Mobile and Texas Railroad yompfary. On mo
:. til II for trial Oh =. ,st il a. II.
q G. Higgins y: New Orleans Gas Light + ooa :,
sHbmited md The Hc NJ, 99k tae M Y anyse ana
John M Howard vs., Texas. and Pacific Rail,
road BY conseiit Of counsel the RUE q. 70 fe ,n
Stang. Advanced GO. vs. WIN. r. sherer This
me syc e Ess W or III af n d sffe9 Eg Tor
es usS Kiter ksarins The peaditqs and A.
g,t,neut, the Court ordered that the plea Of ire
ss mn pH a ts ,, BE- r1s s 70 o as
le pyerrttled. ".
United States Vs. L. E. Norton et al;.,Tine is
condition. that the attorney makes an appearance
for all the other defendants. 81
Superior district court. T,
Germania Bank vs. New Orleans lnsurancal
Association for ipandainus TO compel thfn VI
issue certificates oi stock. The inaidanlus was
4, 7. 1Tefvalop and Leonce aardette "Lsl
socete dee Alrls IOrdre" This ease Y pm =,
Of the roll q members Of said sYciety. and wl
Hlss a The Rri ,y3 =; q Ss ,elp o
and who applied. for a I,iaiidafiius to compqll
said Society e feihstate them as members enH
tied H. oil the rights and privileges q sucl Ii
Me sa Dalton aild Walker attorneys ior tie
ueieh''''"iss ;speriof Cri.,inai Coart.
| Etienne johnson, convicted II burglary, was
sentenced 10 serve b term Of fourteen years N
| the State Peiilfentiary; ,,,., NJ.
rasei ana Samuel MITCHELL f.g assault and bat
| terry; and James Sullivan, Martin Smith and
Charles Hans s fer e en s !, sf ar a sss
In the ease If Mitchell, and si9o In the cases II
salya MatMh aa Hams !, ,s , Iha court then ad
lOufneu uNtif mOuuuy ~ ~ " ioch'
First District Court.
| The case OF the State vs. Christopher Erne Is
still on trial III this court
second District Court.
New SUGGESTIONS -The SUGGESTIONS Of Andre
Duboeh. John 9. Monrose and Bertrand pinhat
Argument Oh the plea Of forgery and want Of
consideration In the ease IF forged note lied
against the succession Of Philip Dfuinn WIS be
gun Fourth District Court.
In the case Of Phillip Hclloen w. Mr. and Mrs
Heller and Hugo hsdwitz, ths Jury returned Ii, ~
n ls s, S e 4s sr gss s 4 ay ;s the de-
Finh district Cosrt.
The judgments BY default we're confirmed in
the cssts 81 Atigtiste Lafeyel vs. jean Berlin
Go. and Annie Boucher .ys. jean Orleae.
s e S ay2 IL e we has s9ss s s of sa Il
''''' 'o''" sixth District Court.
Judgments BY default were rendered r n The
dlngton We. the Louisiana Benevolent Live Stock
Company. and Catherine Dannef Vs. FRANK
jniei,ent for stss was rendered In favor Of
the plaintiff, In the cpse of John Thompson VS..
"s Mtn RRUa ter willow Of p Celbaek. vs. John
Assei-6n motion OF Assistant Attorney General,
and on suggesting Ia the Court that certain real
s ssssa n sad s ts c,I Ae
FeI,r,iary, 1910, why the State should not be paid
the taxes on said estate, IN preferences 70 plain
tilt and all others, out Of the sale 81 said prop
erty. i,
lth January, 1879. was made absolute. and Il was
ordered chat Valerie Leievre subrogated, etc,
do recover 81 Mark r. Bigny surety on the appeal
! bond herein, the sum Of 1858, with per cent.
J interest thcrtun from october II, i870.
Mrs. W. Kaiser at al W.. John steib ct AL
After hearing counsel for defendant. plaintiff
absent and not Represented. this suit was dis
DR.. A. Chastant vs. John Lazarus After argu-
mont and evidence before Jury. the case was
continued 10 9TH Of February. 1870 s .
fault of the 9th January, 1870 confirmed foi
s447 as with per cent interest from August Is
1870.