, 1876-07-01


eof'sVs 4 wns asccrtnlncd tint tho Committee wns
not rcaly tG report, and tho Informal talk sus'
III. Strong sall 4 WAS generally agreed two
Should ho made Irrespective of pariy lie ro-
g1et!cd that any change had coma over ts|o ",
criticised tho cxpcnstye character OF the present
Govcrnnlcnt, and alluded to tho general desire
for reform. II they proceeded to nominate 10
rus1Hn Il Tas ~ sn1s tag 9ou ID
combine to defeat the nomination. They should
throw aside party issues, and try TO aErce upon
agooa man whom all classes Of citkeus would
THE COMMITTEES REPORT.
TIC Committee n6ovc referred to having en-
sered the room, they wcrc called upon nfeport
MI. Leonard sncst said rs mcml.er Ut tho
Siaati-zdIung. Mr. Storey said ho was wilinf,
misht nolninate. When asked who hls. proicf,.
enSc Mr.: s1ersy named r. AZ M.st W1Saar
tic name Of Mr. .1Ioatt, but Mr. STOREY was
strong against him, stating that llls cott-
ncction with te previous =. Almlnist5s. i,dst.1s
ton % M 1se Roapn not dppn hin 1o
III. Rastcr and Mr. IIcsing were decidedly in
favor of MI. Heath. liz had seen number Of
people aruunl town. and thore were 2 great
SIN. il. Fatrbank, others were IN fayor Of hurry
Nelson, and others agnln Wero In favor Of Mr.
Heath and Mr.. Woodard. ,,.,.
tee, stated that he had seen Mr. Joseph Mcdll'
OF The TRIBUNE, wllose first chotce was Mr.:
Heath. That gentleman suggestcd they should
cG Of the sg e acesnta6s 10 c
ie WI was, Slr. Mediil was Of opinion that hu
could b elected. Mr.. shnman, q the m Journal, 70
who waa also seem expressly neGl1 e.. ~ aago1
eves t sat a,gs7 @ a aaI5{ ssisa t9s s,ea @sa
also ia fayor of Heath. A number Of Germans
were consrlted. While they favored NJ.
lcas candidacy thn{ 9st ns asrc mgn oG
thc latc Administration. Mr. Mlcllaclis, Of tic
Ntue Freit I'res'a thought Mf' Heath good
% Sfr. Montgomery statcd that his experience
M, str. nayic Taylor said as hts namc hud been rncn-
toned, hc would state that hc was not a. canll-
aato for the nomination, nnd would not accept
1ir. Mlcllaelis, who was present, said 1t Mr..
Heath was nomlnntcl, to be successful with
lhe Germans Ae would have to .dcclarc the
pf our taxcs and economical administration. II
Ill side issues were killed there would be no
danger OF the result But as soon as they al
iho beer questlon against Mr. Heath, they were
liz. sittig stated TINT he had had q convcrsa-
lion with Mr.. solpp The brewer, who was
,tsongly opposed to Mr.: Heath
Mr.. Larned wanted to know ,whcther Mr:
Heath was the best man to run. He Ind heard
something about TINT gentscman's connection
with g hs g2s ho sy # de9p1e }bn
IONS on this important question, and he would
like eonsp assurance that Mr.. Heath stood en-
hrcly disconnected from all Questions of inter
cs! to the gas companies; u.o.,, ,,,n,o,, ,,,
sss5s 5 ts aa 10 sasn sSnssq1 sa
about reduction. '
II response to an Invitation, g9ye bis vieTa or
desire as So memher o. 5he ninaneG M
Tas TO aet n9nestly ana eonsaent!oqsY S. " s4e
nc VIII .ns o tme IL
syor. hoyoet ln,r.aI3tfin, c,tizcns mil IL y.
t"ra iU nnfGrrnd a ~ tfSS Ronnhcan' "a oty,
r. ;thc snn,jov oueston. hownver. tfoufd
=. J aI,.I In"o"5 :rsn ti,a,, ,ro,,id unite
with aug nnFty that would : defeat
H. raaS. ~ 9xn consictinn M i' that lit question
~. a.,n - "a, ti,fHrrs ~ H., 11... and eloull
Noyn, WSs onS so IT. ts m raja H. A. III cam as ho most
~, w nvs;nb,n ,n, Il ali thu gentle
mar Wilma namcs lad beer mentioned. His
experience nm IN maelpaa M aa eeiIr md would un
vhtoliS vh liz @a %auae sninniq mai In tho Mayoral
.uIts'eo'5 .,ats W - 'p'eAo'
e'!E. Tr..A1a nror oo,, ha Ind heard Ito report Of
thc 1!1m,nittrs ami nj" tuouglt TINT c5ery gentle-
ns, U s,nH ~ an,nnahln II linr tae position
II a W. 'lamcu aI rsefetence ior exau Heath, It
v va a. iar hncaatd hc Ind tl,e ability TO-
ki,nipp kkia9ip'o+ ~ r,sr' Tha DemIcrats did nq&
nsannoo nn.n n moi,o a nomfnntiD bit II tho r.
P!H,n"ra - ron .vcap man tis Dcuocrpts world
punt1c9ns Ian Wcak inaI ~ nm il ht1rj
,hsv o',,Is ~ ~ atoy ovS ohl consider we'll b1oro
fnl}nr f1nnI dh1i,on,
H. Hnifman 1ff NJ h lad ,een Mr., Heath, vi had
ecstfot, eetiu tn1' no eons'4os"
S na,a,or x,* ca,cd for t4t not tctng ac-
,rnintoJ Inrsnn"1,v ssIfh eylAld. Heath, ba de-
9uaa 9uMIoo ~ tfeiteota.4 tfis - - smbect.
onso H. gpSnSlY SnY W sdyt.n ~ tho nomination Of
Ar T ncoth ,uo wi,n always 1ahorcd In tho in
sa.cat ~ ia ct. In regard to the gus COM
nanics. insteajs 0f tayorilg their monopoly, |
thieH1 XII T11ottI .ttIntssH fought against It.
s'AA' AA'ass ~ OLD EiNANuE coMM1rrBa,
IT. ,,aYlor asked how tlloy Tere Eofnr before
~ i.ablc With tho err Of reform II favor of d
mace, tnnat lias Icon Identified NTH anl % approyed