The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1876-05-22

ssssinss ana organs were removed Tor careful sxamna-
ZION and analysis Professor Redwood had submitted
disssted contents Of the stomach. and bottle cor
tanning bloody voit and matter passed BY tho ooweia
in ali he had no dicuity in andine antimory and b;
considered that II had bcen received into the body ~
tartar cnesic and pointed At tho inquest that anti
mony Was poison little resorfed 10 by suicides, bue
that II had ocou used by criminals 20 poison othera
being generally used as a slow poison
INQUEST
was duly held, but the proceedings thcreat never
reported, and The verdict given an open one in 40.
coriance with tho medical testimony. passed BY un-
challenged, unnotced. The Morning Post makes some
stringent and pertinent remarks upon this most ex-
traordnary circumstance Throwing aside Is untena-
BILE tho theory that Mr.. Bravo
COMMITTED SUICIDE
the Post says
II he did not destroy himself 10 must have e,,her
taken the poison by misadventure or have bseu muir.
dercd. In attempting solution Of this problem a
will be necessary 70 examine closely number OF cir
with which we ~ present quanted
any one a motive for getting rid Of hims When :
man sits down to dinner health and shortly
elects OF a poison which ultimately kiln
HIM 1t not unreasonable 10 suspect thai
either Intentionally or inadycrtentiy tho poison
in the interests of public safety the question thus IN
VOWED cannot DO thrown one side as unworthy oI
patient and thorough Investigation. II Will DO there
fore necessary ascertain whether in the present
stance, the investigation has been thorough and
patient Us the circumstances actually demanded The
unfortunate gentleman partook OF some Burgundy III
his dinner. Was what remained the bottle
ined it's non-productiOn satisfactorily accounted forY
Were all the physicians who wcr0 called TO
see Mr.. Bravo duly examiner What evidence, II
any, was given BY tho people In the house Were Mrs.
Bravo, Mrs Cox and all the servants called witnesses
on the inquiry And last, though have said not
least how It that the proceedings at the inquest
were reported? Was this accidental, were
taken to sthc publication. and II so, by whom?
The police Of this metropolis have got into serious dis
credit OF late and they will certainly sink still lower
affair TO tho bottom Here Is gentleman apparently
poisoned ut his table In the aud bru-
tai and the public expected rest content
with verdict that he poisoned but whether mur-
dercd not the jury after two meetings unable
say.
SENSATION SOCIETY.
As may well be imagined, this terrible business haa
made great sensation In London society, owing IA
the high position held In it by the parties concerned
Captain Ricardo, Of the Guards had met tho wife Of
the deceased, then Miss Campbell in Montreal subse-
and Mrs Ricardo and, owing certain occurrences at
Great Malvern he had separated from and
ally Instituted proceedings tho Divorce Court Be-
fore the suit came on, however, Captain Ricardo a
already stated, died Public sentiment Is thor.
oughy aroused, and the comrades Of the unfortu-
nate barrster have taken the matter In hand, some
startling disclosures may soon DO mado. Meanwhile
every one is asking. "who did It, and why?"
LADIES.
Mrs. Bravo widow again, is said 10 DO at Brighton;
Mrs Cox is still In the house Baham which Is now
object OF much curiousty to tho dcnlzens OF that
usually unrulcd outlying suburb Of tho west end Of
London.