The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-01-27

rlRsr DISTRICT COURT,


TIRsT DISTRICT COURT,
state va. Andrew Sinat and Lawrence
Vega, charged with beating a horse. etc.
The prisoner wnH brought to the bar
for artaighment. when counsel for pris-
oner filed n demurrer to g,aah the
Information aud discharge the prisoner,
on the ground that the information diH-
closes no crime known to or punishable
by the laws OF this State.
State va. Alexander Mitchell -Ao-
cuHcd, charged with pe.a...:= larceny.
plead not guilty. 8
James Lewis. charged with petit lar
ceny. plead not guilty,
Frank Crawford, charged with the
same offence. plead guilty. f
and battery. plead guilty Of assault.
InformatlonH were filed against An
drew Heugton, Cecilia keegan, John
Dryer and Willis Clay. for assault aud
battery. .H#u.
State Va, Mrs. Borgonia. The accused.
charged with assault and battery. was
tried, and tho verdict wae not guilty.
state Va. Daniel Smith, The prisoner,
charged with petit larceny. was placed
on trial. and tho verdict was guilty, but
recommended to the mercy Of tho court.
Whercupon the prisoner, having been
In prison "a long time, and being ready
to receive sentence. his honor sentenced
him 20 ono days imprisonment IN the
Parish Prison.
State va. Amanda Perry. charged with
assault and battery, was tried anti found
not guilty.
state Va. A. Alsbury, charged with
assault and battery The accused with.
drew his. plea Of not guilty. aud plead
guilty Of assault.
A nolle prosequi was entered IN the
case Of the State Va. Bridget Madden,
State Va. Louis Hawkins. Verdict.
not guilty.
state w. Mary Cecilea. charged with
larceny. Verdict, guilty.
VIM. Jones and Horace Mack. con.
victcd OF petit larceny, wore sentenced
to eighteen months Imprisonment In
the penitentlary.
State Va. Antoine Manuel, convicted
OF petit larceny. wtta sentenced to two
months from the time of his first iin-
prisonment In tho Parish Prison.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
u. Il J. y. Edwards vs.. l.. j. Ohm.
stead ct AL, and J. nj. Lewis Va. same
On motion Of attorney for i. M. Lewis,
aud upon showing that on tho 2tth Of
December, 1876. the. suit Of J. NJ. Lewis
Va. l.. !. Ulmstcad. No. s232. Sixth Dis
trict Court. and cumulatcd with this
case by consent, per written document
| fled on gath Of December. It Ia ordered
that these suits be cunulated and
solidated.
Samuel Fasnacht w. Metaire Gene.
terry Association, Chas. Howard OF ~.
The defendants, Chls. Howard and u.
Hilborn. having offered percmptory
exception to plaintiffs petition. After
hearing argument Of counsel thereon,
the same. for reason orally given. IL WAS
ordered that said exception be over
ruled und referred to the merits.
FIFTH ptstElCT COURT.
Schmidt Il Hiegler w. g. Tore Il +.
Tore, Jr.The Judgment by default.
confirmed for tho amount OF S1b6 AZ. etc.
Bernadina Buler VS.. John M. Braun. -
Judgment In favor of plaintiff. granting
a seporation of property and 70 have and
recover from defendant the sum OF
j. d. blanchard vs.. J. NJ. Tuperry. -
Judgment for plaintiff for $40.
/, JOS, A. Willard ct al. vs.. Geo. Shoroy
L New trial refused.
L Nicholas Connel vs.. Sarah Booth. =
rnulc taken on tho l2th instant, made
J, 6solute and ordered that a. IN. issue
! aainst the plainliif for S25-curator' RS
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
II. Van Inger Il Co. vs. i. ODER.
haser. for the plaintiff for
(. $65 80.
Budget Reardon ct al. VS.. Daniel Mo-
a riaN On motion of counsel for de-
feponts, IL was ordered that plaintiffs
shov CAUSE on February 3, 1876, why
q the function issued herein should not
o be Dissolved, and why said parties aud
/ suret in injunction bond should not be
condhed to pay mover $75 special dam.
, ages, o per cent general damages, and
~ pelcent per annum interest, upon
the amunt pnjoined.
PolhIs u Doel VS., Sophie Mistrath ct
!. al Jugment in favor Of plaintiffs in
solido | the sum Of $20l SO, with . pei
!. cent.
spEaloa CRIMINAL COURT.
e The Arle and darvey case -
1 The evidnce closed in this case. The
: State was represented by Col. S. j. N
: Smith, VIII made powerful argument,
t in which 70 made every endcavor to1
S secure Q cdyictiop az the prisoner, and
q his closingpeech was earnest ana I'M
4 passioned.
Q Mr.. LuzAberg, appointed by the
court 70 Hend the prisoners. well
e and skillfat managed the defence.
o He argued hat the State had failed
J, that there Us no evidence to convict
/ the accused.
j. The Court ten addressed the jury: :.
i G6ntlsmen-You have heard the evil
n dence and ayument Of counsel, IT il
now my duty explain tho law and the
rules OF evideLe. You are the judges
II Of the law andhe evidence; il you arr
i satisfied beyona reasonable doubt thai
the pfisopNs g guilty, you can prinl
e you can acquit TEN. NJ
vi The prisoners 1t the bar are charged
d with the crime omurder.
One principle as not been toqchee
q upon. It is, whes persons conspire tt
Seqsa e1so snd psFson e Is
~ 10 wv