The Bolivar bulletin. [volume] (Bolivar, Hardeman County, Tenn.) 1865-1888, 1876-01-27

Il FIpkIn vs. Crane ct al, sale
confirmed, decree for u0te to be suFren-
dered up on payment CT costs
Richard Hill administrator etc, VS. s
II Jarmnn e. al referred to clerk an d
master TO take and state account of al
II Illustration, reserving questions.
Lowe & Norment vs. + l. Pled5e, de
( maTer withdrawn, consent to decree.
/ II G Knowlton rs Juber Riley, iudg-
ment for debt aud costs against defend
ant, sale to be mad0 unless money is
paid in 80 days from. adjournment of
/ Court, on s months credit, reference as
| to tIxes.
J g Vernon VS. Z T. Vernon ct al, re-
port of sale confirmed, or der to lend Qua
money, execution ordered, costs ad2udr-
ed, difference as to soIicitoe, s fee, report
as to same confirmed,
p Pulliam VS. Thee Higys ct al, or.
des Of sale renewed
G 4 Swinebroad administrator, vs. Jc-
seph Wilkes ct al. reference as TO assets
snddebts of G w Swine broad g estate,
report confirmed, reyeren &c to take an
account of administration, order to al
Indicate cLtims, consent to decrsa, sale
Of land ordered on 5~monthf ere lit.
Hsrdeman counts vs. D q Wells, ooE-
tinued By corset.
Francis Fentress - widow, heirs aud
administrators Of 5 J boy L, decd, report
Of sale confrInt decree fOI title.
w 5 Estes VS. J } Me- ariey, demnrer
Withdrawn and dfendant allowed 20 days
to answer.
Montczuma Jones VS. r MoAlexan-
der ct al, by consent r II Wo.d made
prrsy complaint, judgment for costs and
unless same Is paid by Novem Der Ist,
1876, clerk and master to sell land to en-
force vendors lian.
Temperance Wilson vs. Jesse Wilson,
decree for divorce vinculD N itrimOnii,
reference as to aiImony and counsel fees,
homestead vested in cOmIl linant, report
as to counsel fees confirmed all costs
adjndged, defendant together with eoun-
sci fees to be taxed in bill Of costs
e c Lake vs. Caroline Black ct ii, oyer
ruled, defendant allowed Sd days to au-
asweT.
Jmes Leak & Sons vs. f L Pledge ct
III. demurrer overruled but defendant al
lowed to rely on same defence in answer,
they are allowed 80 days to answer.
NJ lead Ii Jackson vs. Jennie Jackson,
bill dismissed by comp't and defendant
taxed with sll costs, appeal prayed and
granted
Harkins & Durrett VS. Lewis Moore ct
al consolidated with her causes and con-
tinued by consent
w 3 Rainey VS. Miss. Cent r K ct al,
continued By consent
ID G Sauls vs. Mary Lee Clark et al,
J NJ Richardson appc intsd guardian ad
j TEN for minor heirs and jesse NOrmert
soil citor, referred TO clerk aed master to
report as to vaiue, title, etc of hni
Thomas Boyle vs. Ne Il Pirtle ct al,
demurrer with Irawa AL daf5nlLa.s al
lowed 30 days to answer.
Pitser Miller Sc C.,rril Craw Eurd ct al
Judgment on notes for ianI.
Sol. McKjnnis W. q A Swinebr1s1,
administrator, etc, ct 81 demurrer of
defendant Withdrawn and they allowed
81. days to answer.
Joy 4 Morrison vs. 4 Coleman ct al,
continued
Eleanor q HainHne vs. r G Carter,
defendant allowed 40 days o answer a.
Of this term.
Milton 2 Gross vs. w II Raines ct al.
demurrer rf def ndant Withdrawn and
they allow ed 81 day. to answer.
Thomas Harris " " Ii David Mac on
OF al, Ramsey y Harris, Rsaves u Co.
and David Macon lpwJi 30 days t. an
sw~r demurrer of Jac. Be z Jacabs cverru'-
ed aud they allowed 80 days to ns.er.
John A Wilson vs. George W New.
bern enjoined.
Pitser Miller, use, etc, NJ Shivers
administrator, et', ~ K Daniel, de-
f-ndant all WED 40 DAYS 70 answer.