, 1876-09-10

delny ns Il wcsc, a co,nhiuattor, and tlut Il vas
very likely that ring would bc fer1ncd.''
~ conrso no nauies were mentioned in t1lsa
,"oh, no, this Maloney appears to hc too old
hand at tic business 10 bn ca,glt With chafY
but 1t appears tD mo that thu Council proceed
nEs Toall show wlo tried to delay us, u 1t wa
''1Iow nlary srlel to delay youl''
"IE'eTc were eight negative votes almost
cyerX eye tine thst a',r or'inance was up bofort
"onc hundred dollars nntcce,'' suEKes.e&,
THE TRIBUNE man.
1t lools like thai, docs II notl"
Tho reporscr then hctook himself to
TIN COUNCIL RECORD
npl looked over. Tho votes on tho sfillingtos
Hallway. Thoro i,as been much lillY-lallying
about IT. a. tho extracts from, tlla records ulfl
July 81 tho ordinance cams up for thu frs,
time In tho now reform, Council, its passsga 10
Ing recommended by tho Coiunltttee on Strceh
and Alleys Of the West Division. 1t Nus laid
over and ordered published on motion of Aid.
Lnwler anu Sweeney.
Aug. 10 tho ordinance was again taken up,and
Ald. l:aWler inoYed that It 30 referred to tht
Law department REORGANIZATION. Carried, and
anothcr y weeks delay provided fol.
called up, with tho amendments proposed bj
tlio Law Department tnoh-esscntinl recommend
ations). Aid. Thompton nnoyed that the orlk
nanee @ nc amended, when AID Sweeney moved
nnDlC%k hG pQSkFUuEu l0T tHO WEGKA
Ala. Raleigh moved to lay sweency's nlotion Of
the table, The motion VIA carried, Aid. Cutler
ton, Kcrber, lawlcr, White, Ryan, DaumEar
ten, Nicscn, Lctgacfcr, Sweeney, and Bose,
Tho question tl,cn arose on tho motion u
1mend tlie ordinance, ana Aid: Cullcrtopt
Ae59cr. ODricn,, Lawlef, White, Daumgartcn,
anil tl Boscr voted IN Lbs negative.
ten p IT, ss aa pXes XII Guosten af fs ota d.
the ordinance wore I'D. culcr.on, i s KofSar' ss:
Wits. WI o,n''cn' Law1cr, paungarten, Sweeney,
| II wilt be seen that the minority OF those vot-
Ing agalnst the ordinance arc old Aldermen;
ttat T., they ilaTc had experience in ways that
afe aask and tricks not always win, aud that
cries vera made. Among the number will bu
seen the nnines Of some now members Of tho
Councll, against, whom! not even suspicion has
been ralsed, and Of whose dishonesty It would
Gre also some Aldermen who hnyo already, By
thclr onc-sitlea anl1 pcrsftent efforts in certnn
directtons, !aikcd suspicion against themselves.
1t Is not the tutcnton Of t,iia article to dcsig.
ones Of thc Council, but the aIulnle recorded
| facts arc Eiren.
4 FEW wonps Anour cor MAuoNaY
might be well inserted here. Con ia = corr
tho skist. of Aldermen and hummer politicians
at the City.llall. No one knows any particular
evil uf him, except tllat 10 was once charged
with being tho "go-lotweenn y for tho old Conil-
ell Ring and tho Baltimore & Ohio Railroad. An
investigation WIS asked, md, though several
mcetinKs were held, to gil OF which tile otllcials
Of THAT road were Invited, uone Of the.n appear
Ing, Con eaeaped.
1t has often been wondered, especially by
Corporation Counsel Anthony, why apparent.
~ simple matters boforc tho Coul,-
ia!a over, and pui,hed' SC Fsrhsps liz soiS
tion may now be comparatively easy. 1t might
10 practicable and surely would be- beneficial to
thu city to have suspicious characters rootetl
out Of the City Council. Il littlo al the Grand
Jury inqutatt!on unon Con Ma!ionoy might
reveal the nann Of those in tho Council cotnbi'
latlon. II M investigation Should result in thu
verdict tint there was no combination, thu coul-
intln!tY might be benefited by tho removal, foI
aafe keeping, Of the man who makes II hls bust
ness to arrange tlle "Krabs" for tho City
tenscs from various corporations and person.
Wllo dcsIre favors or justice from the city.