New-York tribune., 1876-12-12
CIVIL NOTES

CIVIL NOTES
Judge Freedman is assigned 10 hold Part
H. Of the Superior Court on Monday next.
In the Brooklyn City Court yesterday, be-
fore Judge Nelson the Of Amelia Keiser against
Gen Stennetz to recover S. 900 damages for alleged
persecution, finally stricken from the calendar.
Assignments for the benefit of creditors were
fled with the County Clerk yesterday by Andrew On
Bouchet aud Francis Bosque To Alfred Lloyd. and by
Ruins NJ. Brundige 10 Gilman Colamore'
In the suit of James A. Harper agt. Julia c.
Harper for divorce Judge speir has denied motion for
increased almOny to the defendant as the painn bad
allowed her the use Of his and S9 week. and she
had e hs house with her child and gone where he coeh
not find her.
In the suit Of Dawson agt. Burke, relic Of
the suit over the bonds OF Capt Alexander Judge se
in Superior Court Special Term has refused TO orera
reference holding that the chief issues IN the case b0u1
be determined by trial before reference TO ASCERTAIN
items and their amounts is ordered
Edward Burke owned property in this city
on which an assessment was laid. The assessment was
declared void, but not watching the newspapers NJ
Burke paid his share Of IT, Afterward dIscoyenngie
facts ne sued the city TO get Lis m0Gey back ana l
ment given for him yesterday, Judge Van bOescp
cvcrrung the city's demurrer.
The proceeding of Perault, who some years
ago was expelled by court-martial from the 9TH Res
ment aud recently had the finding OF that eontartiz
reversed came again yesterday before Judge Brady n
supreme Court Chambers on motion 70 Tsst,n li tAG
on him Judge Brady reserved his decision
In the suit of Cyrus F. Cook against the
Kentucky Cash Distribution Company, the piaintn says
that his Company under contracts TO advertise the De-
fendant were entitled to $32,035 40, Of which $l5GS5
was paid leaving S16,3S0 40 due and, the detenQdhi O
ING a foreign corporation, Judge Brady Ia sGpseme
Court Chambers yesterday granted an attaeninent ia as
suit against all the Defendants property IN ANS state
The jury in the suit of Joseph Blascheek
against Joseph Phillips. in the supreme Court, Is 10 give
a sealed verdict this morning. The defendant % a CIV
Marshal who seized lot OF sewngmaehnes on an exc
cutiOn for S2O6, obtained by one oclEon against e y
cor Sowiugmachine Company, and che real question
the case is whether the plaintiff made honest purchase
OF the goods seized from the Conpany,Or Wbet'f H'
pIrchase was merely 70 dcfeat other creditors
Dr. Flint the teapot medium, made bis
tenth appearance in the supreme Court YESTERDAY o.
habeas corpus. Judge Brady said he had spent TIE
greater part OF u day examining that trOublesoTas
ease. IL any authority was presented showing thas
hsd power to inquire INTO tae mans soy ~ SsPS
man had been four months IN jail, aad their Was hoc1
in keeping him there. The matter was then Adjourned
The suit of Patrick OCOnnOr against Inc
Mayor was tried yesterday in supreme Court, Crci'
before Judge Donohue. Plaintiff sued for four monin
pay MS water policeman in 1871. lie was appoinlea
while Tweed was Commissioner OF Public N0iAs, si1
upon examination ac wlodEed at ne nov % @
ANYTHING as water policeman except TO 60 TO ne 9nse
every morning at 10 ocock for orders. Ihe coiDpisns
was dismissed. AiesSrs. Suahan FindleJ iof Pi-'n'A
ID. j. Dean Tor the city.
In tie SulC OF Adelaide Altman against lH'ieN
Altman Jhdge Van Hoesen refuses the plaintiff aAmoAy
The parties to the SUIT, after long and interrupted
courtship were married ON Nov. Ii, 1878. They nov
have child She charges hun generally win crac
aud specific In reply DC gives a glees
Length his troubles with his Vile and his nOtherhaN.
Judge Van HOesen says: II do not believe thai ss
neritoriOus application for amoDy was ever made; a
defendant seems TO be more sled against tlan sihnu
A suit has been brought by the Victory Wep
Type Manufacturing Company of London against Hen9
Ward Bcecher and Others, trustees OF TIE Christian
Union Publishing Company for damages on contract
20 furnish the latter company with press The press as
first contracted 70 have cost 10, bn leo
complaint asserts that 80 many alterations sug ,
ordered that the final cost was many times the cohuacs
price The press when delivered was not satlsaci0y
aud was returned. The plaintiffs ask $4,000 dalsc,
The defense has not yet been presented the case coun
up only only on question OF what security FOR coss aa
uiaiutiHs as foreign corporation should give Jsue'
Brady in Supreme Court, Chambers, gave an Oue ~
teriay allowing the plaintiffs 20 file anew bopdto eo'
The trial of the suit of the executors o..
Paran stevens against A. II. Dixon WAS begun yes'ei
day in Superior Court, Trial Term, before Judge Ses
wick The defendant sold pledged % horses, and SOME
sleghs and carriages and carriage furniture for over
$4,000, Mr. stevens having employed Dixon 10 disIS'
OF them The suit is for the original amount due Ices S
receipts from The horses DC. Mr. Dxos answer -. ~,
the bad sewerage and drainage OF Mr. ScVenss stay
injured greatly the horses three died 0utfsAI aus
sold for very small prices as sick horses ~ -"
sold the property for $3.50 While MS eNpeus1 " a.
therefore counter claims about II 800, The Csc p ~
on John r. Parsons appears for pit1ntui ho"A' -
Helm for defendant.