The New York herald., 1876-12-10
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CcURT-cHAMBERs.
Rr iutra nra1v

Dy Juuee DTauy-
Schneider vs. Ben necr Wake,nan vs. The Equitable
Gas Lisht and Construction Company; IN the matter
Of the application Of racr church Harlem, Tor leave
10 mortgage. Faust W. Faust --GranteL
Bur.ocS vs. Ear.c.-orGer denied.
Hoppm VI. Wuitmore.-l desire to SEQ Mr.. Mann
kare IS. Duryca No allowance seems 10 be in
serted.
McCatchen Va Esscling This action must be heard
R.ddiesbcrg Coal and Iron Company VS. Kembc Coal
and Iron company.-Counsel viii please appear on
Monday. al ten A. VI.
evidcncc submitted leads To doubt; but when the
question whether months wages is 10 DO gwen Tor
Lcneni OF doubt well may be gwen 10 the defendant.
The mntion SO tar As Il relates the $780, IS granted
therefore.
Ward vs. Benicz Tho plaintiffs have tho right to
seze the indiyldui property OF the defendant and a
ply It 10 the payment OF their debt Ii the defendant
had JOINT property mere sufficient 10 pay the CLAIM
TINS Court could require TO be exhausted before IN
dvidual property should be appropriated Snch IS not
Tue case aud the painliis are clearly entitled 10 inc
Bcrge W. Berge.--rhe equities denied The de-
iendant claims the property and produces oll's and
receipts to and from him. This overcoues lhe SIMPLE
allegation that tho plaintiff is oil the property.
The injunction therefore be denied. but this
OF the plantn. II the defendant attempts to remove
the property and the plaintiff IN fact owns u aud can
present reasonable proof thereof. the remedy now
denied viii be extended 10 her Tho defendants ati-
tude does be hostile, the better course
for both is TO forgive each other aud reunite
BY Judge Lawrence.
Cutting Stevens tNos. l, =, s. 4. s, g. and 81;
Townsend IS. johnson. .-Grauted.
Cutting vs. stevcns.--l SEQ no reason for granting
an allowance TO the guardian nd ltcm IN these
Won Woysky IS. Frohevein. The case OF Hotang
vs. Murch ~ Abb, page l6ll sustans the claim 10
counsel Ices made herein, and being General Term
decision II is binding upon Tho decree asked Tor
Is therefore signed.
BY Jadgc Donohue.
Freedman vs. Asulcy.-Order granted appointing re-
SUPREME CoURT-sPEcIAL TERM
by Judge Van Worst
Somers vs. Faber.-Order settled.
Chl. &C., VS. Fueznar ct al ana Wales vs.. Sherwood
ct aL-f,ndings and DEGREES signed.
Ellis vs. Acknowledgements Tor dissolution Of
partnership. Opinion.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERN.
by Judge Van vcrst
Palmer VS.. Foley. Motion granted See opinion.
wooarun vs.. Boydcn. --lnterrogations settled.
Clcmons VS. Belts ct aL-Molion granted, without
costs
By Judge Spe!r
Marx VS.. Schroeder. Order dismissing complaint
granted. Order 10 be settled on motion
MARINE CoUEr-cHAMBERs
Curlcy VS.. Fryc.-Judgment of foreclosure OF eu
Lyon vs. Goodsell-Form OF judgment settled and
Archer vs.. Driscon; pcrhyn Slate Company vs..
Meyer; HerDst vs. Vichot.-Urdcrs settled.
Quinn vs. HarI-Reierrcd to j. ". Coleman.
Richardson vs.. Foles--Rcceiver authorized to sue.
STARTS vs. Conner. Motion denied
Palmer vs.. Byones --Sccrrity Tor costs required
TODD rs. DeIevan; hurry ". CUT: Hennewnl vs.
Hitler; Moore vs. williams -Molion granted.
Kir.hcr VS.. Klrchcr.-A. j. Deany, Esq appointed
recelvcr
German Exchange Bank VS.. Solomon. Motion de-
ned.
Berman vs. Mintzcr-L a. Gould, Esq., appointed
receiver.
Van Duzcn vs. Marks-S. A. Johnson, receiver
Brown va Ciark.--Rcceivcr's bond approved.
The Fire Ex.nguishinp Liquor Company Bern.
hc,mer; Richardson VS.. Forbes. Bond approved.
Frost vs.. Chapin: Reeve VS.. Doty; Reimurschncider
va Fisher; Evans vs. Mouticc; Farrell VS.. Freely;
Larny CALVIN; Cauhape cooper. Order granted.
Arnold va Walton. Order for substituted service
granted.
By Judge Goepp.
Smith VS. Hawlcy; Baker Webb; Clark VS.. Grade;
Fuch vs. SchinidL--Cascs settled and 1led.