New-York tribune., 1876-08-18
United STATES SUPREME COURT

WASHINGTON, Aug. 1.-THE following is state.
mcnt Of points involved in the decisions OF the United
states supreme Court in the named:
No Gg-The Twin Lick Oil Company OF West virginia sp
OF District OF CoumbAThe appellant here comp aih4At
bclog corporation organized under the laws OF West Viz
gnia, vets much cmoarraSsod N $50 1d Gotowa
given secured by deed Of trust conyeyg an th9 p0pef
rights and franchises Of me eoloi'oh @ 20 s igOo ~ &
in default Of payment Ihe oRS wa s5S pIl t s fS pf n,
OF trust and was bought ~ 3y ~ & Gs s O esr '
Inc the time Of these irai,asons stock.
] HAT dcicntant has abused his relation no
com, any. 20 'asc ADVANTAGE OF us dhelSS " JS N ~ a.
his Snoweg- that the Ieaso Of hc groud On WHICH
Sr ue GSscneT that the deieudaat ioat he money
cool fah TO assist tie business IN hour Of extreme en-
6Syrassirp4 and tooE Just security other
would have Lkeu that when there was 10 slie.t logs
was bought by defendant Al tair aud open So, ana es;
Iraad or oppression, or advantage taAen Of
etenaaaa P9Moa& M & as ., ,e sa assetinS the value o Inc
yoie ~ which ws o IS vel .noMn y Vts.s ~ t,s s
o the is whether deenaants purchase W. asuSy ~
void ras; recr q lGa . 9ioiS ~ % be .n
jec matter Of agency and with .he beneficiary q
jealousy by the and may be set aside on Sngi grounds
receSed tie cear reeosnGn in MS e9a pa & o{leES -;
Hoehler aCt Black RIVER 5als IRON o9y G"s m CO. IL
Maqiay. % Beayan, js6i me Cumberland 70 o%
1s , 5% &fp c gsaera 90 '3ISGi aosiis RSs5ye in & .
coa.a. OF is r,S soi t1' & & ty arc az M ryy WV %hs S
,tere he. so represented oy party canils cnder
u We S ay s eoes T sSsid %Cad G Oo yos a. YEA IT, as %sa
agent sells buys Of himself and by hs power of oiS
here acts which amount % ranhclion Q! ne Pncpa
date tie SkA There u nOthnE among l" fues VI
", wi M t,ds director 20 loan money 10 the c0rpOrt
when IS needed and the 'rans~Gon Is @len a @ Ce
tIoe from Glsmo Affirmed Ai justice M!.E "eh'e'"
NCg JOS. OIL 9i2 0la 9I4 9l5. 9lC 9i7 els ge s2l
g2f 922-RaymOnd aud others aSt The httd >lats
appea;s tion INC court Oh Ca ms ty W 10 tlTy |
forces United states in the state Of Mississippi Ihe
Identity Of the parcels destroyed and TIE property 81 each
ow not be traced large quantity was used " tho
Federal army FOR defensive purposes in the Feiy o. hSs
surrender OF ElcksOug such couh g. luld vas collected
ulal place and at NaIchez ana alto -fH @ as
sane intcfianglcd condition. Tlc procee's weJs
s e com; ~ Gains rdnSG As fact that The oG Of each
OF these scy,al plaintiffs 10 tnd ore pt lbs
nod ta a:hunut TIC f1 remaining IN the Treasury
after drcclng Ayments made 70 oLsr GiNnnh .e hgo
sold 10 create the fna ier silica payment hi o
allcad, made sId te nrbcr q. oseS contributed y
each OF these plaintiffs Ia he conia2 raaS u theo iS
Judgment IN favor VI ne LlhIa ~ tS' vdse 10y u @ ~
bore proportion TO tue wlOls iCri sl or au NAV
tho number Of ms bales dl to u hos nGmor 'R y tSy.
sentct 10y tie iuud frol tcse yiV-o..r Tie aey S@'s
have appealed. It Is difficult 10 so no." TIE nTd states
complain Ie asgrega aLs o ,lS ,hel" y a; y;
than the amount o money IN tGr lFtaS y 10 VIZ
the which, have uiten Ct "c t5st toc ne
provisions " tAe Aba1"olol 70 N"Itufe'
contributor a fund bccouts Interested lA c ihd
ent oNIctS was lhtettuleeu ~ Cu"i H'' ,ns a.
Therefore ownership u common. Tie Cont oi tlNn @s
yerI prrry brought a!l the several claimants together ard
conducted tie suits IN such 1ay IS 10 COMPS" ,cn 10 gAo
win C3t other The judgments IgEdcr'G s cstns e Itss
litigation Fhe several cauIhl al JtSneL 20 ai
discover substantial .Usu,- las e'el 'i,, I"S,
purposes but the United states are nov charged oS Mn
That wlcn attcrwart sold under the lt"'ns o 'o
ii. and constituting the iind uo under oJGsidct+
ton Affirmed The Chief Justice delivered The opinion