New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1876-07-04
r-v1rrn STATES SUPREME COURT.

WASHINGTON. July 3.-The following are INC de.
cisons of the United states Supreme Court In the cases
so sl2Caes Ro khold plaintiff In error az
Eochod william d Eeyn st al N OBJECT Of this suit
10 bring the executors the win q Thomas oeEg me
Of t egates The defendant William d. Blevin one Of
The = 3 S sys E Ta SSe Of Gy d 5s Of the
Confederate money and pay it over {" the EecsHSf 1
under complete military rule and he acte rc,iaj
TO OBEY This he claimed him from 10
The To his son he present
has been brought canuot distinguish tins cas- ron Val
56 and Iartsr asi Reach Is Wall g. Lhe state Gonr
c cS U be- he'd resPos6c 10 hi. qas e loss OF
trust fund 'e loss has not been oceasI ~ 1nd IN
Tins case by the defendant into the hands OF the
S am si to the pantiG This gcs
must be granted ihT CiS, trv saYnh Ann Dorey appel
Ian, NO. on h n appeal rom the supreme Court Of
tbe District Of coirm6a%he land in controversy in h:s
case was purchased By wife with money ~hcn sue T
buildings erected thereon were eGs"es pSs r Ti' deed Of
the taken in her name Ihe contrast iS , insTr
ance upon the buildings executed To he anu n' a. nav
Is S 62S ,9s rn S land Was purchased
made the common Law Governed ~ t
property possessed BY previous 70 their ana
a n1 as 10 t,y srbseent earnings BY ht law Inc money
which The o %S e eanScy to her husband They
vested absolutely in hm as ~, though ssrp ng %er
The prose eds labor and Industry TINS harsh rue
lp a.
was bound by MARRIAGE upprtth wife and tao res, %
the family no was entitled to "naafS, "a RAJ ,Tpose
rule which would goo ground for haa
only applied when the money aud earnings Of he VIE VIZ
necessary for that purpose Bat becoming abilig{
property OF husband, they were subject TO is ula,"
taken IRON them az the OF - creditors. they parooS o
nro o STi' Bn; r housh the money winch Tie VIE
ent case had al d her n4acy ' 81 hsf husband vas
pecn and lawful LOT Inn to allow her 10 ' Rcinr al
the time debt, De- could have iaAon vlaeE5 MON,
IulcI VIM u 'i ~ 10 -. tb have been an
terG N hsr nam. TIC nt Voluntary sctement
upon L,r and the subsequent appI.al,n ni u'i would
have equally been legal dislosi'i.n s Of la, ,,;
forbddcn To tie husband made Win fraudulent intent
aul tc moneys usOa ioI the pose 80 ot ,5
AGAINST h,o il is said thai this s much srou- cf ease N
snpIort me Hpg le ,n , of The VII Srt to be-
deemed -at factory e1Genceo, Dc or,ea % I y,
III. Settlement IL wss granted for cruel treatment aud Their
tie rofcrtv of Inc parties IN such Gaze. Rcycrs NJ
Justice Frld delivered uo opinion ~! lg-e. paws a,s
on tlc ground tai III, evidence DID not warrant it..
n ,l,p IN sr- To- h rt Cent Ter ne Sdr,hsrn
bre' q y III. - q e. a. ,S Sa ,
aid a,tes on Of assignment which "' Hi'.
is,,l. va, made oai On The t- under the p.c'r pro-
nlses pro,aiary nos ascaahcby lndor 'rtinr.
al % \' ss w. w. ' or ~ 1i a.ri. but coaait pnaL
lie agrees to pay ne noto Z The a's,ga, I ,., 'A,.'
l Nfr
the institution 81 sDi arlusi ie uis'r "'a g Iha' a's'
On TIE not" falls due T. nli OF Ihe h-
" e court sad th' rr,"fr h.yona hr ir~,h 'i l
fry.,- tr asseunI equally Jlr a. 600" Nnn'hr UN
I'm rad tbrus.- CYui alton. 1870. t2t fher
l. ru sff. - tlv makers ly ai aHl
this actor proceeds ire Theory That she asue'N Nrr N
cusa under ir ulslnT as iIua iurtuu- A. me '
-uiycucv 'irucr, r1t t'i -'Nt N'l
Lave been uuayaug rher, a,'raiet. 20 ~. oud
Iotnf defamation. follows II,-f. that 10 ihr tine
when notes tcraiu" due Tire tai' uckAta
Islt',TLyli HH. Ia l"
ard hth.o fr0n thence have continued H-' tut
md AN. bl. TO lay. second. tiat the institution 4"
suit ar1ust TcEar Kim s or b1ti'rNrd ~ TIE nlr inc
Nuc since, - i"H. Noai %.
wholly uu1Fali'g. II IN COME lftit
these to must Dee tIitrt u. aud l.h t)
oUiU b, Ursya.E - reason ol ihr N
ulycrcs ,e mtk.5 As co'ue TIE 49, .sinniH l'y
ar t rc ap3 independent 81 each other ih' 'I-t II '.
et4 iu Eoc.ute n ihc nssers were in~ 'ui would
i. o. against iAtu Iut mere OUT
things he-de Insolvency which might render sur uuN'
lag as .uslC., tJu-dt Ia'u lu 90, uo,' - - n
MS case an alu'lrt"0 n h'utU'teF il" .,'"hd '''I
Iucut u io Iay particular Ctus', u1t "- E'n,d
,.ars.. ud To. t.u p..tu'r o." 20 ra'" o t'
trial any reason suit would be UnANh.Ir.
b. d. lI.ls 90 said would have been l " t'gI. D. De-
sufficiently specific 60 NhN" tu1hs' defense Y" IT,
Iut % ts goal verdict Tie first uH'' r"id not pUf
-u,d lr reason proceed 80 hIukr ri,y. Tho bur
d,L Mig ft date ~ o., ttaIssl OF i.t 'uts 90
'aukrurcr tt' drt'iaHF ana it' jay r''' " l