The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1876-06-14
CABLE NE w S
From All Parts Of the
World.
WINSLOW'S CASE STILL DOUBTFUL.
Secretary Fish and Earl Derby Pre-
sent the National Arguments
RELIGION AND RIOT IN BELGIUM.
Intense Excitement Over the Elections Fight
ing in Client and Antwerp.
GERMAN TROUBLE AT GIBRALTAR.
River Floods and foundations
Losses in Switzerland
KAISER WILHELM OUT FOR EMS.
Intense Excitement Over the Elections Fight
ing in Client and Antwerp.
GERMAN TROUBLE AT GIBRALTAR.
River Floods and foundations Immense
Losses in Switzerland
KAISER WILHELM OUT FOR EMS.
THE WINSLOW CASE.
pAN SECRETARY FISH AND EARL DERBY ADJUST
THE DIFFERENcE?

uAN SECRETARY FISH AND EARL DERBY ADJUST
THE DIFFERENCE?
LONDON, June ID, 1870
The Standard this morning in leading editorial ar
sicle ON the winsow correspondence says:-'Tho
papers in the presented to Parliament do not ser
ousy alter our previous opinion that Secretary Fish
Systematically right regarding the terms 81 the treaty and
probably though this point feel much loss con-
ndcnce TO the meaning OF tho act Of 1870; but
are inclined to think that while the Secretary tech
nicay right he is substantially wrong"
The article concludes as ioows:-"The Government
certainly has no desire to shelter wnslow or any
American criminals but 1t cannot depart from the po
Bition II has reluctantly taken, and must hope,
therefore, that the United States government will soon
nnd itself in position Interpretation Of
the present treaty or the conclusion OF a now ono
which will answer the objects tho two governments
have equally in wow"
SECRETARY FIsH's OFFICIAL REPORT IN THE
wINsLow INTERNATIONAL DIFF1CuLTY-THE
PAPERS PRESENTED TO coNGREss-PoINTs OF
THE PRESENT DIFFICULTY.
WASHINGTON. D. c., June IS, 1875
Tho President has to the Houee Of Representa-
tives report from the Secretary OF State with
panyng papers, presenting tho correspondence and con-
dtion OF tho extradtion question up to the 9Th inst
MR.. FIsH's REPORT.
Tho Sccrerary's report is brief and rs follows:-
s.In the month Of February, 1876, one Ezra D. Wins
low charged with forgeros and the
Of forged paper committed within the Jurisdiction OF
the United States, being found In Great Britain was
apprchendcd pursuant to tho terms OF the tenth article
OF the treaty OF August 0, 1872 Thereafter the
dencc OF the crmnalty of the fugitive heard and
being sufficient nd duly committed for extraditon
upon the Sd ofMarch, ult, in the city OF London.
'sThc rcqusition for his surrender duly made on
the part OF tho government OF the United States, and
every requirement OF the treaty complied with
nevertheless the government OF Great Britain has de-
cncd to surrender the fugitive unless the government
OF the United States would give certain stpuatons
certain guarantees not contemplated provided
for by the treaty between the two governments
sin addition winsow, there two other fugitive
criminals in London charged with forgery and the ut
tcring Of forged paper, for whom demand has been
made and who have also been duly committed for ex-
tradition pursuant the treaty. but whom the govern
mcnt OF Great Britain in like declines to do
liver up.
.Thc application for tho discharge Of winslow and
Brent has been adjourned to Juno IL.
.ln the OF Gray the time for his detention has
not expired.
The correspondence called for BY the House Of Rep
sesentatvcs to the present date with certain
panying papers and documents is herewith respect
fully submitted and VIII show the points in difference
between tho two governments, with regard to the
specvc rights and duties under the exradion clause
OF the treaty Of 1872"
The main points the correspondence have already
been Published
RErERREn
Tho papers have been referred 10 the Committee on
Foreign Affairs, who, tho alss Of March last were
Instructed to inquire whether any, and II any what
legislation is proper by Congress to remove any DIM
cuties in tho execution OF the treaty.