The New York herald., 1876-09-21
Portion of unpaid debt to the gov
S4,aas 4s


per cent Ills 2l35
Portion of unpaid debt to the gov
e""e"'' rxasix1rios or rrrxs :"
FiRsr irEn-rhs 4. catered under date Of February 10
Deco. 1e'. $500 trustees AAa master o'm~''''0"s''
NJ rs e1x, o ii. Ss d red % S
or rat a. any other u TINE.
deed principally consisting q resi.a adapted the
saas The prepara Of sS an
asrumsn. soald form item q shsrss e"nsds ns
Ia payment tor entire service OF and specific
eh:rEs Whatever vas ever made ,os IT,, with
to deed Of railroad company pursuant I"
such charge made. rendered collected by
In point Of fact the document which is no. quite long
IN ordinary deed and was intended 50 have effect Of
judge N swayns. now o the United states supreme
Court Mr. Tld,n was never paid Gr Il n any shape
deed Of reconstructed corporation. $500"
ss as s Mr. eHrrs T
s n @ % T. ns %po
continued service running back the 1872 and the
draw single Of this description have application
FouRIn llra.. March I. Fees for second mortgage
charge ever ads rendered or collected BY
equally to this with the additional that being from
ns "a ns . ss. ."
In psn, Of fact NO specific sum was ever paid lori
The absurdity this charge transparent This third
client the second, but secured Indebtedness only
So the fee for drawing the third mortgage against
OF such charge any other specific charge
s M ssn % @ for sS n. OF @ s s
syns and cas IT. hs Fort
Mr. Tilden never rendered collected was he
Sot there anything bu, the these deeds
which base tho S.sSmpSa that the work on them was
~ A4d sa here = is Icpss to .y few word: IN regard to
pose that counsel have been paid high
rates which ISlss in subsequent years Mr. Tden a, nat
of business in which he engaged required particularly
iholoash kaoslsaso Of the railway system and bust
dsvnr the and s0a1s sse.ns
way. and means Of reeynsiiinx apparently con;
OF ali The nere drawing OF paper.
services paid be sesoncea and
other in this could then have DONE
hopesssy lost. Yet this publication set down upon
ing ssso ior work which could no. have ceeu
sS. n H"s nHa xs . M @
tina. he WORKING At the same class OF business and
uys years service % Or - the e rate % Of $500
Ths allow. tina. half Of this should
ducted the ground that it probably earned In
1857 Neither was any ofit
Coal and Iron COMPANY in that he did render il ian
ali s % Il
thing received it have in
Eighth M no. to morss..
bondholders OF ~ LOUIS Alton ana Teire Hause Railroad
OF b, was rends red by Mr. Tilden in the
nnsd the only basis which the Times started
ncs"ssts5cy between Governor Tasn return Of income
ss and H, certain ain a,"n: AN Answer in
OF four in suit brought BY the ST. Louis Alton and Terre
Ii You page a. folio l4s you will find these
THAT for such services tho defends Tilden made
charge Of $4,000 against said second bondhod
mortgage bondhoidsr. October 1885,,
holders under an agreement between themselves dated
Now. then. tho question ITSELF what were tho
serviee. for which this payment was made, and when
at folio l43 they further
% ss the S c that 10 the
long prior and the time Of tho
Tor the trustee. OF the said second mortgage bondhOder
ana sad been IRON S%s mu I%s IN & the ssar sn.
vices rannins through wears anterior iss and it
s any, Of this ''" can therefore ''
bondhoiders Alton Tsrrs mauss SairOsd
Company %D. per ,sn sniaasi, !: Sioo"
and still eluny with tsnscity In
answer before msn.ionsa 1o tbs document snail
s:'. s' q as sssssss
&
by,hs said An.ah c. tasg, surviving receiver .fOrs
these defendants. deny ha. either claim.
by for, claims against the il
'ss for s
the s as " the said bill OF
To time the rendition services an
Hr' where iS
aud ha. he aso acted as the prineps or
the said first mortgage bondhodcrs in relation to the fore
eesds connected thsewith and that such mad
during period of years there
In other words the rendered in 1858 1852
1850 and 1851 No considerable part OF these services be-
they rendered had already reached August
an aware that di>ingennous construction has
been pai by the Times upon sentence from the .nswer
services Lad commenced pror to the 1892 and
three years Thereafter The Argument pf the Times Is hSs
admits the Of these SERVICES dur
stood alone any lar mind would read them
sisr they had commenced which Is expressly stated TO
t.u ays s M s , ss
i4ss Ss, q, eoo,,o ~ III. writer desired to ,,.
ing And intent c this passage ard fou nd ambiguous. he
w9ni look to hs conser and indeed to the Whole answer
csvs that tho foreclosure suit in which these
1861 oo 90 and that the road actually sod in the
nine month: OF the year isGs which couIa not hsrs
called tor these ssrvses and as to the ineIv. between
tins could not have called for much service being ,he
occupied by the running oil the advertisement OF sale
Furthermore the payments which give rise the discus
sion both before the close Of the year 1862 and
IL IL SO stated la the answer.
II recoect rightly the Times has former occasion
referred the of the OF the mortgage
Londholders set forth In the answer Ap Is, 1851 evil
dencs that the services
but the final confirmation negotiations
which had been going ior three years There pre-
lminary adopted Ameetng Of boudhoers
September - 1853, and modified from time time,
this earlier itself the
goations tho affairs OF the road being almost
involved with conflicting claims and
this preliminary agreement Of the railroad
had been obtained ms far back December ~, IsJy
TENTH December 81. Fees during from
Chicago aud Northwestern Railroad Company. $2U0Ocn
This item 10 totay false Mr.. Tden no fees
compensation from the Chicago
er a,lway Company in the year 1851
ELEVENTH ITkN-'Fees during from Toledo
| ba h Railroad Company, xlj UUu"
The recklessnts OF ixisehOod will
known that the Toledo aud Wabash Railroad Company