The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1876-02-16

Sr LOUIS Feb. l5.-On the opening Of
The Baboock trial to-day the counsel flr the
Government said that further testimony would
reach here from Washington respecting the
desp pltoh Of joyce to Babcock, dated Dec. g.
aud the one from Dabcock to Joyce, dated Dec
!, lNt. which have not yet been admitted. The
sourt will not passion the admissibIlity Of the
Avery telegrams until the defence has an oppor-
1un,tg to present evidence that Ayery's name
was known 10 the Grand Jury aud was not In
c,udtd m he Indictment naming the conslira-
tofs IN objection 10 the Avery tell grams, that
u was shown that Avery was In the &. nspiracy,
WAS OyerIuled a. the telegrams themselves
tended 10 snow that
Alfred Beys, the distiller was put upon the
Nand nnd testified that Joyce showed him the
"sIlnh de-patcu from hancock in December,
t7ii' Hhd at MS under -tIndinR from II was that
tho nv nue. ageut- were not coming, and on the
nteneth OF the Information preuarations were
made to run crooked. when JOY ce showed the
witness this desa4ich he told hun everything
was t'l rght and 10 60 ahead. Witness con
unutd;
J9'ce showed ma 'tor at his ONCE about three o.
sni ne gave Il O. m-. wanted 10 sau,fy ny partner
turned Il 10 the az rllun.
Defence ubJecsl to witness stating what was
m .no l,itcLo Low 1t was addressed, or even
ll'a Courl ruled that tho letter Itself was
primary eNldehr e'ahi secon larry evidence could
no. be- dmiltrd lntll 1t could bs proved that
THE rFfrc1 or BABs LETTER.
Nj. lievs wa asked the effect Of the letter
OVrTiulcd.
witne.s s,id The letter satisfied me that II
"as u iieht, and W. would not be disturbed In
ma ing lhcit whskey."
y. u frazet hu.i 'e-s PARTNER OF the previous
Wlthts testified that MIR. BeVis SHOW ed hIm tie
Ieltei nuehiiuned 10 his (I3eyis's) testimony In
Deoehber' lSti' ID that the effect OF II
va, Va slc" mouse fecumnenoed making Illicit
On q cros'- examination Of this witness he
,a,u , ne was pIettl veil acquainted with lIOge,
nv ieNehue agent, lo wnOm the Ring money
t, tnec u' u al' nut could not tell just when he
tu't'i l." serve lhe King Tor now he was seduoed
80 9',NIo e. witness received various let
,eIh ana telofr ms from Hoge. Some OF the
iatttr were signed BNuy." lie recniIeoted 20
luz OIhriludli tnmert him on one occa- Ion
pretty well advised i ia movements Of reye,
nue. agents, and Was generally considered as
~o'H!hs Gonscientiou,ly In tho cause IN which
eleyru letter., the wuunR on which he identi-
nf ni As ,nI vi lioee, Dit he never saw or heard
VI '"' Nt.cis before.
y W1IlubuTon 10 THE RING rUND.
,,,h't' ~, airnt NJ manager Of bingham
tri ',,. u'slu'e heie testified 70 having con-
whlch WA a. ~ a., ~ l'ih S@,S0 to fund OF 5000
tnn s WIN JoYoo rcg rllng lie purpose To- which
the money VA, put. '''o PN'''o' w ""'O"
Che deIe"as,tH d H1~n n,nn " Mis- proposed to convict
'i.,,''iH''t ht lhis Coz. .yers,tinn we obinct
p' HnsI MeN sir,xe uro~ose 10 do ~.
judge DiiOu-Do o'jr't' ,,-
evidence declaratinus H1'h 10 snow oy thls
with this TRANSACTION H. J'lHe IN cohnectlon
anti lmplioate tho deIond-
Col. Dior-I do
COl. BrOadhead -Yes A.,
OF tho ruling m the MI upon the prlhclpleb
IeavenwOtth'. declnraf Nee case IN regard to
preciaely, ! do not see .- .9, ~ uey are VIC same
your iling. ulurIehce euplect 10
Judge DillOn-Yes. sit.. ,.
be this; In the Mckee mo ulherence would
the defend lnt's connect 70 We required lhat
20 lie established be lOre H. WI VIC e,'n, piracy
tiOns. NneceNed the ueclard-
Mr.. storrs An importar .,r.
Col. Droadhead was 'lluerenoe, ,
did not undeIstiud the 70 remark thht J
show that in the Nick ee II 70 require us 10
IhAt IL would . hetter 4, t'e, nut only told Us
testimony In before introd We had all our own
Judge DillOn-Which wnht H.
Col. BrOldhead-W hiGh s1Nhe.
Judge DlllOn-And then ~ zone.
laTatlons to 20 into eyldenc, aloNed the osc-
OOl. DrOAdhead-Of cOurs.
init that that was the ruling "Nout hohors ad-
JOYCkB DECLARATIONS o. No -
Judge Dilon-There Ia no AZ AZ ACCouNr
II La uot con