Belmont chronicle. [volume] (St. Clairsville, Ohio) 1855-1973, 1876-03-02
COURT REPORT.
Present, Judge CHAMBEI;S, Clerk
MITCHELL and Sheriff COCHRAN.

L NlCI n
MITCHELL and Sheriff COCHRAN.
State of Ohio vs.. Reuben Hague.
Defendant indi, ted at October term for
shooting with intent to kill. Said de-
fendant having failed to come into
Court and answer TO the Indictment,
his recOgnizance is declared forfeited.
Nancy Foreman ct. al. vs.. Lucy
Burtoft ct. al. Sale by Sheriff con-
firmed and deed ordered.
State of Ohio VS.. Stewart B Coins.
Indicted Tor assault with intent to muir
der. Jury disagreed and are dischar-
ged.
Brooks, Fab nestock Il Co. vs.. NJ J w
Glover. Judgment il. favor of plaintiffs
for $232, 80.
State OF Ohio W.. Charles Yaus; stab
bing with intent to kill. Defendant
Withdrew his former plea of not guilty,
and entered ii plea OF guilty.
State of Ohio vs.. Louis NauI. The
Attorney for the State, with the per-
mission OF the Court, entered u HOlie
proseqW.
A new Grand Jury having been call
ed and sworn, returned into Court and
presented the following bills of indict-
ment: Against Wm. Hardy for muir
der in second degree; Charles st. John,
Assault and battery.
State of Ohio VS.. Martin Fink; vio-
lation of Liquor Law, two cI-es. De-
fendant Withdrew his former plea of
not guilty. and entered plea OF
guilty The sentence OF the Court
was that he should be confined in the
County Jail for Thirty days, and pay 81
fine of 500 aid costs.
State of Ohio vs.. Chas. st. John;
Assault and battery. Plea of guilty;
fined ten dollars and costs, and be inn
prisoned i'll County Jail for thirty days,
and during the last 10 days of SAID term
be fed on bread and water.
John Lochary vs.. VI w Glover.
Master Comn'r ordered to execute and
deliver to heirs of plaintiff, deed con
veying the premises bought by said
plaintiff.
State of Ohio VS.. Elliott w Ball;
cutting with intentto wound. Deien-
dant entered into recOgniZInce in the
sum of $500, with j W Ball his surety,
for his appearance at the next term vi
Court, aud the cause was continued.
Holloway u Brock VS.. Tho5. Mccall;
sale by Master approved and confirm
ed, aud ueed ordered.
State of Ohio vs.. VIM and Valentine
Lust. Permitting games TO be played
DC. Plea of guilty. Fined 500 and
costs.
State of Ohio VS.. Wm Lust; violation
500 and costs.
r a T,L al.
ton of Liquor Law; plea of guilty.
Fined 500 and costs; ordered also that
room where the liquors were sold be
shut up, until defendant enters into a
bond of $1,000, not TO sell Liquor contras
ry to law.
State Of Ohio VS.. Jack Jones Jury
found the defendant guilty Of cutting
with intent to wound.
State of Ohio VS.. BaltZer Stroble. vi
olation of Liquor Law; tried to Jury;
verdict of guilty. Fined 500 and costs,
and to stand committed until fine anu
costs are paid. Also ordered that room
where liquor was sold be shut up until |
defendant enters into bond OF $1,000, |
not to sell liquor contrary to law.
State of Ohio vs. VIM. Clark,
" vs. VIM. Schindewolf, |
'' vs.. Margaret Bray,
90 VS.. Patrick Whaiep,
:" I" vs.. Robert Sherry,
Indicted f0r violation OF 4th section Of
Liquor Law. Pleas of guilty wore
entered in each case, and The defend
ants were each fined 500 and costs, and
to stand committed until fine and costs
are paid. Also the lulluS where such
liquors were -old az. Ia 10 shut up un-
til the deiendan rh'cI ITO bLnd OF
$1,000 each. not 10 sell i!qdor contrary
10 law.
State of Ohio ". Marx Alberts; vio-
lation lst section liquor law. Plea Of
guilty. Fined So and costs, and TO
stand committed until fine aud costs
are paid.
State Of Ohio W. VIM. Hardy, Mur-