The New York herald., 1876-11-18

easier; Horton vs. Dauchy; Robbins Vi. Valentine;
Hodges Porter r-Granted.
Strauss Beli Dickson vs. Bell; Valentine vs.
Bell; Douglass vs. BeL-Blanks must be supplied
hangeis vs.. Behman.-No reason for an order 10
show cause.
Loughran vs. Casey-Explanaton required.
Benton vs. Black.-No alidavit OF merits
In the Matter OF Brook Avenue, &c-Explanation is
required
Mayor. &c, VS.. o'connor Judgment granted.
Townsend VS. Hadley-where is the referees re-
Matter Of the New Yorker Sangerbunde.-The names
should be noticed by the notary
streeL-orders granted.
In matter OF certain new streets Of the Twenty
third ward Order adjourning motion granted.
Mutual Life Insurance Company va VOorhix Must
be presented to some other judge
Mayor &c, VS.. Goldbers.-Order Tor removal is
ter 625 OF Laws OF 1s7l
lie surer vs.. LIE sureE.-Rspors OF referee is
frmed and judgment OF DIVORCE with custody OF chill
dren. Is granted to the plaintiff
Won schmhover W. Rowland--This motion must be
granted on the authorities Of Aauveyas Tyler, 81
n. y, p. Sos Motion granted, with costs.
Froudc VS. Suthcrland.-I cannot strike out the
amended the ground stated the notice OF
motion. There seems to be wide difference between
the two answers, and as the amended is not
on Its face frivolous II cannot bo ovcrrucd The
the Special Circuit calendar, and
direct that II be set down Tor the oath inst
Bassford VS.. Bassord.-ln this sase, AZ In many
other cases where tho suit is for divorce which have
lately been submitted the plaintiff allow ed TO tes
y 70 matters as 10 which the statute OF 1867 rocudes
her from testilyng uaws 1867, p. 222, vol - Re-
however, enough proof 10 support Judgment Tor
divorce ard The report OF the recr1e Is therefore co-
nrmcd and Judgment granted in favor OF plaintiff
Tucker vs. Lvingston--Having again examined
these papers desire counsel suggest the grounds
on which allowance rs asked for ana to hear their
views Us 10 the proper amount 10 be allowed. IL
would appear from the affidavit ot Nr Tweed. OF coun-
sci Tor certain defendants That the principal labor IN
tho bad devoved upon him. Mr. Carpenter as
guardian I'D hten, has power or authority con-
sent TO the proposed order and there Is nothing by
way OF aiEdavi. before me to show the amount TO
g. psei cun 4
is IN my power 10 grant allowance IN this case de-
siro some evidence that the granting Of an allowance
In the Court
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM
By Chief Justice Curtis
Clark VS. Blnnin2cE Let notice OF settlement OF
this order be gwen TO the parties III The proceeding and
Smith vs. Smith.--Order resettled Parties may
submit name Of receiver. Bond reduced.
ny Judge Speir.
Ncill The American Popular Life Insurance Com
Iany.--rhe defendant mnkos two mo,ons--one thai a
commission Issue TO examine q witness IN Ireland !;
the other to be permitted to amend his answer The
motion Tor a commission is granted, without stay.
The motion to amend denied the ground OF delay
Ginibernatc vs.. Gould ct aL-Dcmurrer sustained,
with leave to plaintiff to answer on payment OF costs
Mills vs.. Could OF a.-Dcmurier overruled, with
Leonard VS.. The New York Central and Hudson
River Railroad Company.-Motion Tor trial on
the minutes denied, without costs
Canzi Va. RoethisbcrRer 81 aL-Order correcting
judgment roll.
Pfuhl vs. Helms mS-Updertaklpg approved.
Kelly ct al Garrison et al-Or oil reference to
Hon Joseph ). Bosworh.
Even VS.. Martin; saiicr Miller; Wing vs. Good
ridge; Naylor VIZ Lunt: Knowles va Do Aldanian.-
Orders granted
MARINE COURT CHAMBERS.
BY Judge McAdain.
Fontana VS. Friedbers Fehr VS.. Nichols Slauson VS..
Equitable Gasght Coinpany.-0piuions Finke VS.
Dyer; Froherscn Ode; Ferdon barrow;
Thyson VS.. Ludwig; Shook va Byrns; Lawrence VS..
Ramsey; Appleby VS.. Atkinson; Powers vs. Willard;
Scher,ng VS.. New York Manufacturing Leather Com
pany; Rylo VS.. observation-disclosures granted Fuller
Sterucls Motion 10 pay over money granted.
Hoyt We. Mcyers.-Motion to amend answer granted.
ZIiick va Morgan.-Deault allowed. Smith VS..
Observation-Disclosures allowed, baiIable in 81 500.
Zeller Laiaf.-Rcferred 10 Mr.. Gustavus Levy.
Force BarkeE-Sccurity required. Duryca VIZ.
Shannon.-Complant dismissed. Book vs. Finncgan.-
Attachment ordered. Branch VIZ. Egan.-Motion to
punish for contempt denied Hanson Laum-Do-
iault opened payment within nve days OF $40
OF the present and $40 costs o, the iorner motion.
Cary VS. Koch.-Receiver appointed. Ahcrn w.
Lazarus; Harding vs. Denning; Lanse VS.. National
Register Company; Fueck VS.. Lump; Lawrence
Ramsay; White w Meyer; Quirk vs.. Whne.-orders
granted.