New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1876-03-20
Ile Times Yesterday published the following


Lengthy csDeaTam from it, AmrIlc IN respondent
Tho Foreign Committee under Nc r..Clnon PASSED
come with the Emma Mine James r. Lyon OF icon
ORIGINALITY oS8ed Monitor ole ter
ward me Emma Nine Hgny hssser als ~ w. a rsrs
between them which witness detailed the wtnrss engaging
sci Alter litigation witness engaged 70 ie 200 oDa
erest 70 o Tss s ,o lad been tlc oat Tie ~ ne
stewart conducted the bargain IL New fors sc"ai on
5afain Win PARK but occasion
e gr na'a as e schsrssd al the miners bit six
be but the mine pat III The best ,ape lo al eng
reputation stewart and Pars won't . England Stewart ele
glspheI witness GA the 9!h Of Noycmber 1911 " come
10 London mmed,3iey witness Ven, STAR Ttd
san eI rSpoT that toe Emma ne was onc Of Tho
great miues Of the world sang hat 900 worth Of ore
prospectus being PAID him as The pT2as'er Of tns
s g their name H. Puosou Of thai house was promised
9l00OO using is nae ba. Tho moae. va, nsfeT Pan
300 saros 40 per share Albert LEWIS Sons iyeIpoo
$1,000 a 90 for ma.iag f.yoTass report IVA, VA
aTo for not obtaining the sum pro9i'ed Vice. ~"
Cen Schemes on the st December 1911 letter
Para saying thai he intended 10 io,Gu MS IeStorsp be
said he would have better et'.i IMAM tat zen
ntgee ts SIO pa4k sd bs was bott Endorsement 81
Emma Mime than hcheucks name as nfso'or " hsi
hSsand. Park said he had nTed thing, with schemes.
SAL 4, ..' HSsS o ig no. isIrSr"H from Wiais
s0HSS M and H@sieS Of orr with large disc RES n
ia mine TIC stock advanced Tine shareholders thought the
schene4S nam appeared ~ ihS o pTSsPeas as american
3OJ tIevoasV NV be1t Grant told The wi,lInss he
gave stewart 200 shares to becOm5 director himself
and assist getting schenoks name on TIE board Iar
a0OJ Tor services Ieldered In lnd grant Park wahtei
seenek 70 give Lsai an t1Sa Fsr vGas man OK
J. 1872 The nno caytd m S1n haa DHt sio oSsh 9
satisfied TO The non production o. ore be replied
so deep prevent hauling but that they cond msko ny LOT
%s cnecIed with company July % 1872 ser MS
fSsuEn nS large ore 5i scuS wont Tar be-
ycnd his expectations There vas no rpot Oh va. P ,
sue ia 80 tho sock advanced The Committee
is nothing very new in all This, except the fact
Of Inc Times waking up 10 tho necessity Tor puD7hns
scribe as the snow scene this lte b, play The dlrec-
tors OF the Emma Company nave lurhSaou us r,mn,s
stakeholder whom he wished to "inspire witt tte
more confidence Co.,
EMMA srGyEa MNiNd COMPANY QIs snl I Io45
in MnI.np esq., II c'1irn9ai road Ls.'," bsieht,n
has bscn sa la y by ne esnsE YOU
pardon I say you are unnecessarily uistu, bel nrn
sSeSy share T ns ever s ii IN
he .ne and ne would have board had not political
oppoaenIs began TO make capital Of his position 50
as 10 elnbaIr1ss Cen Grad s i retirom@nI blow 10
tae Company persons see IN hs RnDasnne Ul s
psay think yon will do very yrona 70 part wa y9nr
shaye. an shareholder and - nay intention 20 sos
10 mine fully believing shall 10, tho 'ey nuch hghHF
before long
we're siow storms America bmoKing ny We rslNsy We
have had ny
Telegraas from the mine inform rs they ar ."
railway ail'ot nv
where ~ must roman until we "a y ol 4tai
We also norm taa, ,hey hsye sa 1n Nave
inspirei yOd with hts more cehnhrSeo sn ~, '
y0gTs fnin!ullY. W - tV0H,s' - sr..c.,
MT va yams goes out 10 determine ths pS-Sm ., 49,,
ing smelling w0ras. which tia pros2ectu 500 "H- F
poe oil 10 sct and " Inspect tAs property seaiay
There b ono paragraph 10 this evidence OF M ss1s
H. Iyons h0,yoysr which will not be generally under