The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-01-28
THE COURTS.
SUPERIOR CRIMINAL COURT.

Tho following informations were lled :
One against Jack Caslmer, for ombezzle-
ment; one against James HOllins, for
CARRYING unccalcd weapons; one against
J. G.. Roux, for shooting with Il danger
Gus weapon, etc. ; one against Samuel
Barnes on two counts LIST, robbery, and
I'd, grand larceny.
In tho case Of the State against Mrs
T.. M. Adams, the plea in bar of prose-
cution was sustained and defendant dis
charged. This was u case involving
VS.. Henderson, 13 A., y. 40: 80 A., p. 433,
i'm the case Of State vs.. Forester; LII.
Revised Statutes, p. 500.
james Augustine, convicted Of grand
larceny, was sentenced to Imprisonment
In the State Penitentiary ut hard labor
for the term Of five years.
Louisa Jones and Virginia Lewis.
convicted of grand larceny, we're sem
fenced, the first for three years, the
second for two years Imprisonment In
the Penitentiary.
The case OF the State vs. Mr.. and Mrs.
Bruin. charged with grand larceny, was
before the jury and continued until to-
morrow.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
Nicholas Daunoy, administrator, pray
real estate Tho defendant filed u per-
emptory exception to said rule. The
exception was maintained and said rule
discharged against Pierre Berges, de-
PENDANT herein, and continued to make
the nominal owner parties.
Charles Vogel vs.. the Attakapas Mail
TRANSPORTATION COmpany-On motion or
counsel for Eager, El1erman q Co.,
lossees from the city Of New Orleans
Of tho landings and wharves Of said
city, for reasons on file, It Is ordered
that the plaintiff and the defendant
show cause, on the Sth OF February,
1876, why the firm OF Eager, Ellerman
Il Co., should not be paid the sum OF
steamboat Iberia, IN preference, to
the claims OF plaintiff, Charles Vogel,
or any other person.
Mrs. Pitcher VS.. Pugh Il Schwartz
Appeal allowed the plaintiff, etc.
Louisiana Insurance Company VS..
Antonio Costa, Mrs. Navarro inter-
venor-This case was taken up and
continued by preference.
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
| Court met pursuant to adjournment.
72s1.-Norman Whitney VS.. The Impe-
rial Insurance Co.-On motion Of coun-
sci for plaintiff, ordered that the stipu-
lation between the counsel for plaintiff
and defendant relative to the effect of
the verdict and judgment In the case Of
Norman Whitney VS. The Phoenix In
Court, upon this cause made, signed
and fled in this Court be entered and
spread in extenso on the minutes OF the
Court and 1t Is as follows, viz: N. Whit
ney vs.. Phoenix Insurance Company.
1t Is hereby agreed that the verdict OF
the jury and the judgment Of the Court
in the case Of Norman Whitney VS..
Phoenix Insurance Company shall gov
ern and control the case of Norman
Whitney VS.. Imperial Insurance Com
pany, and the writ Of error in one case,
shall suspend the proceedings in the
other till a final decision
United States VS.. Geo. Fl. Sheridan
On motion OF the United States Attor-
herein be allowed to the United States,
returnable in the Supreme Court as pro-
vided by law.
| Z. ID. LeBreton. assignee, etc, VS.. A.
Sambola, assignee, etc.-On motion of
defendant, 1t Is ordered that plaintiff
show cause, on the 29th instant, why
the writ Of seizure and sale issued in
this case should not be quashed, etc.
The following cases were set for trial
on Monday, Jan. 81, 1876:
United States VS.. G.. Robinson ct al.
4 United States VS.. J. j. Kerr ct al.
United States VS.. Vredenberg & Co.
ct al.
United States VS.. Chas. Choisy ct al.
For Tuesday, Feb. 1:
United States vs.. 1880 pounds leaf to.
4 United States vs.. l6, 400 cigars, etc.
| United States VS.. 800 pounds leaf to-
bacco.
j Pennsylvania Salamander Manufac.