The New York herald., 1876-11-24
Miss Martinez Again in the
Witness Box.
Fiat Contradiction Of the Charges Made
Against Her.
Summing Up the Case by Counsel
for the Defence.
A Review OF the Career OF the
Plaintiff.

The court room In which the trial OF the MARINER
Del valls sus is being hold crowded yesterday as
usual Owing 70 the excellent arrangements made BY
the onRcers Of the court under the charge OF Mr. WILL
lam H. Ricketts after all the seats had been occupied
person allowed in tho room and tho result was
that thsro was NO disorder confusion by persons
standing In the open spaces between tho boxea Even
those who sought for admtanco before tho hour 1xed
Tor the opening Of the proceedings had arrived had to
range themselves along the wall Of the corridor In
single Ole. This plan prevented crush 1t the door.
ways and persons whose duties required them TO be
present at the trial had difficulty In getting into the
court room.
Tho business Of tho day was begun by Mr.. Beach
calling two Witnesses tho evidence sought for being
In rebuttal), Thomas J. Hail. music dealer, with
whom the plaintiff used 10 deal. and Patrick UBrien
m employs Of tho Everett House. who had discharged
the boy Manning Tho questions put to thom wcro
objected TO by the counsel for tho defence and tho
objections sustained by tho Court on the ground
that the evidence they expected to elicit
in rebustal OF any testimony the defence had given.
The two bell boys Manning and Giennon, wore then
called
TWO BoYs AGAIN.
Manning testified that he had stated that no was
ployed at the Evorot House, and discharged by Mr.
o'Brcn because ha did not suit; the night he at
Mr. Del valcs he slept at homo; he loft Mr. Dol valles
before ten O'Clock; didn't know whether he made
affidavit. or not then signed paper and was sworn;
went TO the house OF Mr. Buckley that night but could
NOT say whether no had conversation while there
u one John Clune.
To Mr. Choatc-The afHdavts were made out by Mr..
IAtl Wallets lawyers after had made my statement
And then signed it did Glcnnon his statement
William Glcnnon testified that he went to Buckleys
the night no called at Mr. Del valos slept there that
night having reached there about halfpast ten;
didn know John s. Cune, but understood that no
stops at Buckcy's; saw him about three weeks ago,
but did not think he saw him tho night he came from
Mr. Dol vallos; remembered that he had converse
ton with Mr. Buckley after he camo from Fourteenth
street, never said to him that he would make enough
sut OF the case to keep him through tho winter,
did he say that he could make nothing out Of tho
plaintiff because she was poor; simply told Buck
Icy that he had soon Mr. Del valles lawyers.
To M Choate-No one but Mr.. Buckley was present
when they talked about the case; whom he told him
that he interested in tho he meant that no
knew something about 1t, having been in the hotel
whore the plaintiff stopped.
MISS MARTINEZ IN DENYING MOOD
Tho plaintiff next took the stand Her counsel put
series OF questions to her. with Wow Of having her
rebut some Of the evidence OF the defence which was
particularly damaging 10 her. She was seicom-
posed ever, In way furrcd and gavc her answers
quickly and at times rather sharply, combining herself
occasionally pronounced twice 10 the question In
. rather emphatic tone. Quite q number Of questions
put to her were objected TO by the counsel for
The dofoncs on the ground that they werc
not rebuting any testimony already given by tho de-
She denied sha1 se wes he
arts by appointment or that they exchanged cards the
day she fell In rwcntyninth strceti that she told him
that h0r ather had been cnraged because he her
coming home from church with two young mon, or
that that day her father took liberties with
mo, sir; never went to church" sho denied thai
Ar Del Vale sent her 500 In answer TO letter to
him; that no advised her 10 return home when she
was at the Hotel Royal; that be expressed his
dsapproval OF her leaving her homc or that he first
offered her $50 month ns housckoepcr and finally
ngreed TO give her 800 month that no told
her tho 2sth of juno that sho could no longer
remain In his house on account OF her conduct; that
she begged 10 be allowed to remain aud thst she
wouki thereafter be good, or that he over told her
TINT he had discovered rrcgularity' In the union
oi her iather and molncr; shc also cmphaticaiy do.
Amelia Jackson, NJ to the rolling on tho floor with her
limbs exposed and denied that sho ever slept with her
bedroom door open, and stated that Celia, when shc
sam. IRON saratoga only gave her ssOo not 5000 sho
testified that she did ask Mr. Del Vale at The Jew
sry store buy $500 pair Of earrings there was
no $500 PAIR Of earrings in tho store Questioned
about the scene described by Mr.. Del Vale when be
alleges no discovered her writing letter which shc
tired hide from him tho day he he spoke TO her
about tho irregularities oil her faher and molhcr's
anon, she SAID no such occurrence ever took place,
and she denied that she ever exposed her limbs i'm
modcstly Tho following questions were then put to
her by Mr.. Beach, the answers to which wore gwen
cmpnusiS snOWcu
moss had made Up ner mind not 10 bc misunderstood
On any point
VINO ARE THE TRUTH rELLKRss
O. You heard Etho testimony OF William Glcnnony
A. did, SIR
O. In his narrative as 70 his having taken up par
eel 10 your and nndng the door locked and
ing gentleman by the namo Of Frederick Hammond
la the room, that trucs A. No. sir, IL is not
@ Whose name was appended to the bills ut that
hotel? a. There wore several names.
Q Some OF them had Hammond's name ons A. Yes.
SIR Frederick A. Hammond.
* aNx~.. lxo{ I 40
q. Have you made efforts TO fnd him? A. have.
O. tshowing diagralnl Is this diagram of tho
room you occupied at tho hotel Royals A. Yes, sir,
Docs Il represent tho position OF tho furniture
q. You have also heard the testimony given by the
man Manning? A. have, SIR.
a. He says that he went 10 your room, knocked ri
The door, inquired for Mr.. Hammond. and that you
opened ii; that Hammond was sitting on tho bed ana
inut either you or Hammond said he would appear
did any such occurrence take paces A. II - entirely
The witness then testified that on one occasion, fow
lays after her arrival nt tue hotc she requested
Mr.. Hammond, and told him wncn he came up to say
10 anybody except Mr. Del vallc, who might
call, that shc was not In; II was ut
and spoke n lew words TO Mr.. Hammond; my door
not locked. rhc witness was here Piled with qucs-
tious rciatveto the testimony OF Celia RAINBOW and
Mrs Quack kenbos, far affected her She denied
seriatIm all the accusations made against her by Celia,
and declared that shc hnd the conversation with
Mrs Quackenbos that that lacy had testified TO, aud
smphnticaly asserted that Cellars story about being
n her several hours on the lrst sunday IN June,
1879, was absolutely false.
The REMAINDER OF her testimony was rs foows:--
rhe door leading into tho hall IRON the Jackson
occupied was obstructed by a bureau; heard Mrs
puackenbos testimony; never remember having any
such conversation with her as shc described; never
not her before she TO Poughkcepslc; heard
ar. Lewis testimony IN regnri 10 tho
aansactioas at Mrs. Nelson's; never requested
% have letters left there; never stated to Lewis
y anybody that two letters containing money had
,ceu lost; Lewis before be cane INTO court;
never received from him cticfs with initials +. H.;
ocvcr was Lewis office, 500 Broaway the state
mont OF Mr. Del valc that introduced him 10 Mr.
cramcr Is false; dad not know him then january.
1870; became acquainted with hm IN tho latter part
,f February, 1873; was introduced 70 him by his
,rothcr defendants two eldest daughters spuKe Eng
ish very WE'LL did not give Dol valc my picture the
iay ator the accident md 20 Central Park with
aim. US hc testified To-; we had conversation about
MY leaving my mothers before did so; he ncv,r told
me he intended 10 pay me 100 Tor my services 10
aim before went 10 Poughkcepsic, the statement nc
,nndc that ,alicu ut the Hotel Koya and gave
MIC $50 d false; he gave mo no money when be came