The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1876-04-06

hauer-MotIon granted and Mr. D. X. schuster ap-
pointed receiver on ding bond In $1,000
Marshall VS.. CoopeE-Action continued against tho
Successors OF John 8 Marshall, deceased.
Nolan Harriz-cause restored TO the calendar,
Newton vs.. wiard.--It is doubtful whether this
ton the proper remedy, but IL Is not opposed
the respondents may take his order.
Stillman Eilin.-Moton granted, and Charles
Price be appointed guardian ad liem on giving bond
in 81. 600
allowance liked. Decree granted
Crooks vs. 0tard-Referred 70 take proofs and to
ve proper compensation Tor the receivers counsel
Bell VS.. Tdcn.-Moton granted for third Friday.
Heller VS.. Stevenson.-Motion granted.
In the matter Of Crosey Motion Tor stay OF pro-
ceedlngs denied, without costs.
Partridge Thayer-The motion Is evidently made
for the purpose OF delaying the trial Of the cause Tho
plaintiff may take his commission II no SO advised,
but the stay or proceedings Is denied.
Cary VS. Conner. Motion granted and Charles
Price appointed receiver
Rcchert VIZ Reiehert-The writ must DO allowed
with y stay; do not understand how the magistrates
mony.
oppenhcimer VS.. Dcckelman.- Motion granted but
let the plaintiffs attorneys have days notice OF
the settlement OF tho order.
In the matter OF Kngsbridgc road-Referenco
ordered
Littauer vs. Goldman Application denied. The OBJ
jection be taken upon the return OF Judge Dono
hue's order TO show cause which Is returnable 1t
early day that the plaintiff cannot DO seriously pro-
Bogert W. Bogert-Repcrt confirmed and counsel fec
OF $3.50 awarded to plaintiffs counsel
Ntven Nivcn- Report confirmed and IS per week
allowed alimony and 500 counsel foe.
Kramer Va ZwicKert- Motion denied without costs
The Knckcrbockcr Life Insurance Company vs.
Grecne-Motion granted for first Friday.
Chsom ct nj. Scott Report confirmed and
Judgment OF deficiency granted.
Mcintyre VS.. McIntyrc.-Report confirmed aud judy
ment OF divorce granted.
sullivan VS. johnson. Motion granted.
Foley VS. Benedict Judgment ordered for plaintiff
on demurrer as frivolous, with costs
Burghaus VS.. Spaulding; Cannuett VS.. Handode ct
al Gilroy and another Scheld -Motions granted.
Bower and another VS.. BelL-Motion granted for
Greer vs. Richardson. Plaintiff must servo bill Of
particulars within i've days or his proceedings Will
be stayed.
Brar,an aud another va snidcr ct al-Default
$40 OF motion and for inquest
and cause set down for the 10th inst for trial
amount actually received by the defendant Edward
Green, and the amount lawfully disbursed by him. or
which he may properly be credited WITH and TO report
what sum said Green should DO required TO pay over 10
Van wart VS.. stillman.-The motion must be granted
without any condition as 10 the oral crossexamination
The commission is undor the Revised Statutes, and
its provision must be strictly folowedthat is. the in
tcrrogatories and interrogatorics must DO
ncxcd TO tho commission
Carrigan va shaw-It is quito evident that there
collision In the settlement and that defendant
should not be permitted by his wrong to deprive
innocent parties Of their rights The motion to dis
continue
vacated. Tho motion TO substitute administrator as
plaintiff must be granted.
Morrey vs.. LillenthaL-Moton for reaojustment
granted The plaintiff Is only entitled to the costs
accrued subsequent the order which the costs
OF the cause were paid to him. this Is the trial lee al
lowancc and disbursements. As TO the items which he
previously neglected to tax no cannot them now,
because he has been paid all the costs of the
he chose TO adjust them and he cannot so behind that
settlement
Tmpson VS. Andrcws--The receivor does not hold
the collaterals rs general assets OF the estate He
h1xlc fha mt fl.n Van
Krupts did. The matter pleaded Is no defence to the
The defendant can have his collaterals by pay
ing the note or the Judgment TO DO recovered on the
Breen VS. Muoch.-The attorneys have stipulated
that they shall have precedence on tho calendar
other suitors in which not preferred by law
rule and ask the Court TO grant the order upon
consent" This practice is not favored. This motion
must be denied, but as both parties are at fault with
Stanley VS. Chamberlain The facts disclosed are
exceedingly suspicious, and the plaintiff should have
the fullest opportunity Of probing them 70 the bottom
The motion TO dissolve the injunction should be de-
MED, with $40 costs s, to be paid BY Reno.
Moore vs. TallcoL-Order granted
BY Judge Donohue.
Barnett vs. Brennan; Roebng vs. Duncan; Nander
VS.. Mander ct a.--Motions granted.
Matter OF Priestiyi Stevens va wrislcyi matter Of
Teads; matter OF Nissan; matter OF Falk, &c
Granted.
The Mutual Life Insurance Company wcmplc.
Guardian cannot consent
Tho Tribune Association w. the Sun Printing and
Publishing Associationi Smith VS.. Armstrong; De
Embn VS.. Ramirez; lansing VS.. Lansing. Orders
granted.
Fernandez VS. Morcn.-Moton denied. Tho case
seems to me ono OF gross fraud, and the defendant
should De held.
Fernandez va Moren-Leave to renew granted.
(See Code, 173 and How, 34dl
Tho. Society for tho Reformation OF Juvenile Deln-
qucnts, &c, vs. Mack ct aL-Ordcr granted coutinu-
ing injunction.
Week Va David; williamson vs. coSb.-Mosions
denied.
Bergen VS. Raymond ct al Order Il corrcst
Eaton Eaton.-Rcport OF referee confirmed and
decree OF divorce granted TO plaintiff.
Scibt vs. Bauer. Order settled.