The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-03-03
THE COURTS.


neHuaIu, MOVIE U Ire0tlSS vs.. Net
: Orleans. Mobile and Texas Railrop
parties, trial by jury was waived an,
: the ca,ise submitted to the court ,,po1
the. Pleadings, statement Of facts an,
evidence on file. On consideration
!, whereof, 1t was ordered by the Oour
that as to Raynor IL Morgan the suit b,
dismissed, and judgment was rendered
In favor OF plaintiffs for the sum OF $500
With five per cent interest from June IL
! 1875. till paid, and costs Of suit.
John II. Oglesby and b. i. Flanders
appointed jury. commissioners Of this
court, appeared and took the oath D
office required by law.
On motion OF the United States Dis
trict Attorney, and on suggesting to the
court that for the purpose Of investiga
ton OF alleged crime now pending be
fore the Grand Jury, that the said Crane
jurors should have an inspection OF the
original papers In the succession OF
John K. Elgee. It was ordered that
Frank Pace, Jr., clerk Of the court, dc
forthwith attend and testify and bring
the original files and record in said sue
cession.
Elk parte N. w. Casey, receiver. pray.
ing, etc. It was ordered that said Casey
be authorized to compromise the judg-
ment against Il. A. Stewart upon the
terms and conditions mentioned in said
petition.
/ superior District Court,
We arc authorized to state that on &C
count OF sickness Of the Judge OF this
court, It will have no session this week.
FIrst Dlstrict Court.
Present, Hon. r. Akell, Judge.
State vs.. Oscar Salum Tho accused
plead guilty OF obtaining goods under
false pretences, and was remanded to
await his sentence.
State vs.. Mrs. Bailey In this case a
| nolle prosegui was entered.
Jane Middleton was .rraigned on q
charge OF assault and battery and plead
not guilty.
Henry Cooper and Cecilia Keegan, on
q charge OF assault and battery: Willis
Clay, on a charge of larceny, were
tried, and the verdict i'm the first case
was guilty, and in the second not
guilty, and in the third case, guilty.
Taylor Ferguson and Charles A. Du-
bon. convicted of larceny, were SEN
fenced each TO one year Imprisonment in
the State Penitentiary.
second District Court.
Present, Hon. A. L. Tissot, Judge.
Succession OF Anthony Fernandez.
On motion, etc., It was ordered that the
account presented herein be approved
and homOlogated and the funds be dis
tributed in accordance Herewith.
Roaldes VS.. Marson.-On motion of
Chas. Il. Claiborne, Of counsel for plain
tiff, and on suggesting to the court the
filing OF the plea OF prescription herein,
1t was ordered that the plaintiffs claim
be limited to $500.
Succession Of John Davidson.-On
motion Of Ogden Il Hill, of counsel for
the succession, suspensive appeal
from the judgment Diminishing the petit
ton for an injunction, filed September
10, 1876, be granted returnable on the
Succession OF Mrs. Virginia A. Starke.
The vouchers in this case having been
duly examined, and the petitioner be-
ing entitled to the decree herein prayed
for, it was ordered that petitioner be
discharged from his trust as admins
traitor herein, and that his bond as such
be cancelled.
Third District Court.
Present, Hon. e. Meunier, Judge.
Louis Eternod VS.. James Anglade
The Judgment in this case was for the
plaintiff for the sum of $5l 40.
Pierre Donns vs.. PHILIPPE Sinsene-
Judgment appealed rom was reversed,
and it was ordered that plaintiff do re-
$65. 6HtA
Mrs, Victorine Angoma, widow Belac,
now wife OF Phillip Widow, etc, vs.. Mrs |
f. M. Adams, alias Hays judgment |
was in favor Of plaintiff, commanding |
that the defendant deliver to the plain |
tiff the premises now occupied by her |
the aefendant.) a.
FOURTH District Court.
Present Hon. b, L. Lynch. Judge,
M. A. Dooley VS.. Matt A. Hogan and
James Flynne.-A default was entered
herein.
L. Peret VS.. Widow i. Fonteneau.
The decree from the Supreme Court, on
The appeal taken in this case. was or
Tered TO be recorded. That decree af-
firms the judgment appealed from, with
10 per cent damages thereon for frivo
Ious appeal, as prayed for.
Mr.. and Mrs. r. Widow VS.. Mrs T.. M
Adams, or Hays.-In this case new
rial was refused. T.
Charles Raymond VS.. p. Bergeret. "A
Jew trial was granted, and the same was
liked for Saturday, the 18th inst.
Shelly x Co. VS.. Llambia5 Il Dock
ORA new trial was refused. i;
Pifth District Court. |.
Present, Hon. u. North Cullom, Judge.
L'Hote Il Co. VS.. Lucius w. Miller
The default of the 26th of February, 1876,
vas made final for the sum OF $500, ,
With legal interest thereon, from De-
ember 18th, 1875. {
Josephine Ruand, Administrative, vs.
Vim. Zadick-This case was up and I
losed as to evidence and continued for I
rgument. 5lHt.. "
sixth District Court. t
Present, Hon. A. Saucier, Judge
Ed. B. Wheelock VS.. Mrs. Louisa t
and husband.-On motion '
I Kennard, Howe & Prentiss, OF coun y
oil for plaintiff, 1t was ordered that II. I
Jr.. attorney at law, be APP Z
Ointed to represent the defendants. 9
A. ROchereau Il Co. VS.. Elizabeth .
rame There was judgment for the q
laintif for the sum OF $3.50, with inter 6
It at eight per cent per annum on $3.50 4
ON the 18th Of October, 1875, and on e
36O from the 14th Of October, 1871, and q
We per cent attorneys fees, with spe- d
al mortgage on the property described e
plaintiffs petition. 1920. n
Louise Maenhaut ct al. VS.. Helen q
default OF the 18th Of u
ebruary, 1876, was made final for the I,
i'm OF $500, with eight per cent interest u
lereon from the Goth OF August, 1874, a
I'd on the further sum Of $22S8 SO, with o
ght per cent interest thereon from the 81
tn OF August, 1879. five per cent attor- U
wa fees with VendOr'S privilege and ~