The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1876-04-04
DECISIONS.
suPREME CHAMBERS.

SUPREME coURT-CHAMBKRs
BY Judge Barrett
Weld OF al w. MulleE--Dcfault opened upon pay
ment OF tho OF the motion 10 dismiss and OF this
motion and all disbursements incurred since The de-
fault taken. Upon payment OF such costs within
i've days the motion 10 dismiss may be brought on two
Dieaenbacn Va. D,cfTenbach. granted
BY Judge Lawrence
Lila Va ward-In this case on the papers submit
ted will grant ~ order to show cause why the mo-
ton should not be rcargucd.
Bose VS. The southern Ohio Coal and Iron Com
pany-As Il is denied that the person served with no.
tce trustee OF the company, do not feel inclined
to appoint receiver.
Matter OF the GUARDIAN Savings Bank; matter OF
Gill; do not exactly understand the position oil the
motions in the object Of tho orders pre-
scented. Counsel may appear before me at Circuit,
Part l. on Tuesday, April 4, ut three O'Clock r NJ
Cutting va stevens. In this nothing has been
handed 10 me except the proposed order. require
the papers and reference to the decision heretofore
Hcsthcrtou VI. Heathcrton. settled.
Matter Of Hatch, &c Bond approved
Page VS. page.-This motion Is made too late and
should be denied upon that ground oven II no other
existed
days IRON date submit to exam nation the attachment
will not ISSUE shc must also pay $40 costs
SUPREME CoURT-sPECIAL TERM
BY Judge Van Worst
Stc,nbeck Va Brennan &c.--Moton for new trial de.
wash va Kcmp-Case and amendments settled
SUPERIOR CoURr-sPEcIAL TERM.
By Judge Curtis
DAILY VS.. Byrnc.-Bai reduced TO 5000
Boynton va Baydon ct aL-hoiion for receiver
granted unless the defendants execute bond 10 tho
plaintiff with surctics the penal sum Of 000 con-
dit,onal that they will pay such amount, u any, as
shall lie found due to him the nnal determination OF
this action to justify on four days notice n
excepted TO, and such bond to be approved by the
Court, costs OF motion to abide event Of suit
BY Judge Spcir.
Chain Va. Chain Reference ordered
Harrison VS. Tinker. Undertaking approved
Can,rd VS. Dillon ct al-Demurrer sustained, plain
ti1 Is complaint dismissed with costs to defendant
Uarnett ct al Grandy--Ordercd that judgment
be marked second on appeal
Brirua mr. VS. WEBSTER ct al-Rofercnce ordered.
smith Macdonald. -0rdor denying motion for
new trial
c;crarbeck va Gernrbeck.-Oroercd that defendant
have Judgment on demurrer, NC.
Brugmnn VS.. weirotcr et a.--Referee's report
Armed and judgment Of foreclosure and sale ordered
suPERIoR couRT-eENERAL TERM.
BY Judges Mcneil and Sedgwick.
Plunkctt VS. Applcton.-Order affirmed. With costs
and disbursements.
Meyer vs. Cark-Order affirmed, with costs and dis
Bragno VS. Lord Judgment and ordor annrmed. with
costs and disbursements
Porter VS.. Acknowledgement affirmed.
Lord ct al MISREPRESENTATION reversed and
trial granted with costs tho appellants 10 abide
weis va Brennan, &c-Judgmcnt reversed and new
granted, with costs to tho appellant TO abide The
Gibbs Of al vs. Huylcr.-Judgment affirmed.
Bovine vs. O'Bricn. &c.--Judgmcnt reversed and
trial granted with costs to the appellant 10 abide
Bacne VS. Doschor &c-Exceptions ovcrrulcd and
Judgment tor defendant on order Diminishing the CON-
plant
trial ordered, with costs TO the appellants to
The stafford Pavement Company vs.. Monhcimcr -
Judgment affirmed.
Buticrncid Va Raddc: scchow vs. Radde-Judg-
The appellant to abide the event
Morehousc and another va Yeagcr Judgment
affirmed
COMMON rIEAs---GENERAL TERM
By judges C. r. DAILY. Robinson. Van Brunt Iarre-
more, J. S. DAILY and Van Hoesen
Josuez vs. Murphy.-Motion for reargumcnt denied,
cantroII vs. Connor-Mosion for rearsumcns denied,
40 costs
The Cold and stock Telegraph Company Va The Pei
ictrcau Raynor Company Motion Tor rcarsumcns
Stanton vs.. Murphy. granted
Carpenter VS.. Wcisendangcr. Motion denied
The People, &c. VS. Caryand another. application
The People, &c, vs. Bannan.-Application granted
terms
The People. &c, Va Williams. Application denied
The People, &c, VS.. Florence and another.-Applca.
Matter Of Application denied.
Watson VS. whrbeck Judgment reversed, with
costs
Altman VS. Brigham. Judgment modified by re-
ducing damages 10 <45, and affirmed for that amount,
without costs OF appeal to either party
Flint vs. Corpctt Judgment reversed with costs
( f'nckc vs. The Phenix Sick Association. Judgment
affirmed, with costs.
Washington vs. Ravcncll Judgment reversed.
/ Jewell w. Hentzrl Appeal dismissed
Sussdorf vs. smith Judgment affirmed with costs
/ Elbcrneld vs. pligcr.--Judgmcnt reversed, new
trial. costs 10 abide event
GaiIard vs. charlicr Judgment reversed, with
costs, with leave piantn 20 give stipulation and APP
/ ply tor rcargumcnt, as stated IN OPINION
Nahien vs. Brown--Judgnent affirmed. with costs
Halliday vs. Carman judgment affirmed with costs
Roberts vs. The National Ice Company. --Judem
affirmed With costs.
mcnt Affirmed with costs.
Welsh vs. schuyler II al Judgment as 10 Van Rens.
sclaer schuyler reversed, with costs
Hazaman vs. Fox Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Garrison vs. hittnacht Judgment affirmed, with
COSTA