The Vancouver independent. (Vancouver, W.T. [Wash.]) 1875-1910, 1876-12-09
The Genuine
j. H.CutteT
WHISKY.
Its Agency and the "Sons-
jn.laW Farce"

CINCE THE j. u. CUTTER WHISKY
= has obtained its great celebrity in this market
as being uncqualed in excellence and purity. there
have been numerous attempts az countcrieitg IT,
In this card desire to cali the attention Of the
public to effort now being made to impose II
spurious article upon the trade >.,..,
The agents here OF Milton j. Hardy OF New York
advertise him AS the manufacturer OF the genuine
j. H. Cutter whisky. TO ,dlsprove this We have
simply to quote the affidavit Of this same Hardy
wherein he swears that he has no knowledge Of IT'S
manufacture, and that the formula Is = secret IN
the possession alone Of c. r. Moormnn OF Louisville
Kentucky, for twenty years the only manufacturer
Of the genuine Gutter Whisky, for whom we are the
agents.
MILTON ]. HARpY's AFFIDAVIT.
Milton J. Hardy vs.. Charles II. Norman. United
States OF America, southern district OF New ork, s.
dcpnse and say rs follows During the existence II
the firm Of NJ. j. Hardy ~ Co. and 1. L. Moorman ~
and collections in the city OF New York and have
had nothing to do with the equalizng running over
ing been attended to by Mr. Norman, at Louisville
always supposed that hooks, called running books,
had been kept, hut Mr. Francis - Moves, ON my he.
half recently visited Louis vile, and am informed
by him that he inquired for such running books of
receivers deputy. and Mr. Becky said none had
ever to their knowledge The process ofirnn,nG
secret i, fr jfoor,onS posscssou and consequently,
WHISTLES not run over aud equalized or refined are
thereof should he at disadvantage in competing
with him; while II run over, equalized or refined,
should incur less risk Of being nnjnstly dealt WITH
February, 18Th LJCltS W. HOW,
Seal Notary Public
A true copy.
Witness my signature and the seal OF said court,
this 9th day Of August, \. ID. ISL
w. a. ERiW ETH Err. Clerk.
BY SAM. Il. GRAIL, Deputy Clerk.
This efecually proves their assertions to be false
and needs no comment.
BY another dodge. however, they seek to give
their statement IA semblance Of truth, by laying
great sire upon the fact that Hardy and his part
ner are both sOns-in law to the dead cutter hoping
thereby to hoodwnk the trade and tn" public into
the bp lief that they really have some knowledge Of
the formula Of celebrated whisky Rut is there such
potency in the relationship OF son-in-aw To II Cutter
that IL should dvugc the weli-guarded c-secret Of
!. II. cutters partner. G. +. Moorman. who always
was and still is the only one who has the sg
knowledge of the formula by which the genuine j.
H. Gutter whisky is manufactured? But this sons
in.law business is so rdculssly absurd that we pass
ii without further words.
We simply desire to state that We ar" the sole
agents for c. T.. Norman IL CO.. who is tn" only
manufacturer of this genuine whisky w" have
been his sole agents for fifteen years, and have
guarded well the purity Of our whisky, which has
obtained Il Worldwide celebrity, and ouIy notice
this device Of its counterfcitrs as caution 10 the
trade and the public against the vendors Of bogus
article.