New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1876-05-30
MONDAY, MAY 90. 1876.

O01teO 9S0S0o SAAONAs O~AAss
Present-Hon. w. B. Woods. circuit
United States vs.. Dennis o Brien ct ais
Motion for a new trial fled for John Hen
derson on the grounds that: l. If there
was any overt act committed it was not by
Henderson, but by w. A. Thomas, who had
been acquitted, and Henderson not being
present was therefore innocent 2. That
the court erred in admitting the answer in
the civil case against Henderson.
illinois Central Railroad Company vs.
New Orleans, St. Louis and Chicago rail
road.-Ir appearing that the road ia in
solvent, and the court considering all it's
property in the hands Of the receiver in the
custody of the court, it is ordered that the
receiver be permitted to obtain from the
clerk of the court wrirs of mi unction az lnst
all interferers when necessary.
E. D. Morgan and James A. Raynor vs..
New Orleans, Mobile and Texas railroad
Same grounds and same order.
The court adjourned to May 81, in honor
of Memorial Day. May 80.
supreme Court.
Present-Justicss Taliaterro, Howell,
WHY and Morgan.
Absent-Chief Justice Ludeiing.
REHEARMGs REFCsED.
No. $40. Rufus NAPLES VS.. city of New
Orleans
No. 1886. W. W. wsshourn vs.. W. Van
Norden.
No. 6l29. C. A. johnson vs.. town of Don
aldsonville.
No. 6l56. Felix Brand Va. same.
No. $500. Succession Of John n. Smith.
supporter District Csurs.
New Orleans Insurance Association VS..
city of New Orleans-Tne following insur-
auce companies, Hone. Hibernia, Peoples,
Teutonis, Home, Union, Commercial and
Merchants and Traders, set forth their
business as insurers against fire; the con-
tract of the city with the Firemer's Chsrita-
BILE Association, December l, 1871, for
$4,000 for five years; the contract Of eimi-
lar tenor Of May l6, 1876; and aueRe that
the Administrators had no right to author
ize nor the Mayor to make such contract;
that ordinance No. 1924 and the contract
twenty nine Of the charter OF 1870; that Pc
titioners had the right to compete for the
contract, but were deprived OF II; tsat they
would have taken it for less than $i4o 900,
and claim $1,000 damages.
Mrs. Fanny Freret va. city of New Or.
leans and DISQUALIFICATION on $loC
bond to prevent sale OF property adver'
tised for taxes May 30.
State of Louisiana vs.. B. Gaudet et al
INJUNCTION 10 DIcNSUl tuLcE4SICEco "1tu toc
officers of the Board of Heal h. Argu-
ments finished.
Louisiana State Lottery Company VS.
Durante Daponte.-This case. having beer
submitted to the court for determination
the court considering the law and the evi
dence to be in favor of plaintiff, Losisians
State Lottery Company, it is ordered, ad
Judged and decreed that there be judgment
in favor of plaintiff, the louisiana STATE
Lottery Company, and against Durante Da
ponte, tor the sum of $500. with eight pei
cent interest per annum from the seven
teenth of May, 1875, and with costs OF THU
proceeding.
Superior Criminal Court.
TRUE BILLS.
Perjury-Charles Williams. Robert Mil
ler.
ACQUITTED.
H. G. Koppers, of embezzlement.
CONVICTED.
Bob Moore, OF burglary and larceny q
the store OF Folsom Brothers. on Old Leve
| street, April Z.
SENTENCED.
Edward Bell, five years for perjury.