, 1876-03-17
demanded inyeatigatton BY Telegraph. and, whon
hc did more, Mstah and Mrs. Marsh wsrc In, or
on theit way to, Canada.
n

ITO Ahs AssaeGatd Frsss.1
6Eh, EtDnUo'A rEs1tMoNY.
WAsH1xoroa. y. u. Marol 1o.-dsn: Kiddoo
appeared tlsfore tho Commttteo on Erpend-
tufcs In tho War Department, wAs sworn, and
vas asked whether hc told Col. Grafton, Of tny
S.1s s' t .f osss s1rsssa .sG 5 Mr. iR 11a1 5
Bit. Pondletou, and Mr. ClJmor travelled to-
gother In Europe. Tito witnosa rspcd that llo
did not, AZ nothing Of !he KIND occurred. Wit
noas: however. mot witt, Clyrncr at Vienna, Juiy
and parted At Dorin In July. The wtnoss, IN
answer to 9uestion, replied that, as fnr All he
recalled. ha ro'ased 70 Col. Grafton,
Gen. po,nton's informant, who said 70
tef Which oashs 70 oNi !,o ,bofoasaly M iapes. ,es
tientsd, who'll pcrhats involved prominent
member Of the party othor than that to vhIch
Belkaap belonged.
MEANING rEnpLFron.
nfr. Cymcr said they had 10 snfllclont data to
60 OH for tho investigation. Tho witnoso ro-
nlcnlbprcl no said to Clymor that he had aa
milch data against pendloton ~ he had against
Delknap s|,en DO commenced Llh Investigation
Of tho latter. Tho witness, 10 response to .
question from CIymer. aaid, in anbsthnco that
he would go 10 tho War Department for tnfor-
nation concerning pendio.on, whcn Tho Witness
told him he lad botsof go 10 tho Treasury Do
pars!nont.
hlr. Ciymer-Did stow IN unwtilingncss to
examine pondleton's caaol A.-No. [ never
said 40 to Col. Grafton. I thought however,
thoro was strong pxrtHan feeling IN tho mat
tor, but this wAs only An opinion. You neither
expressed nor manifested Nh lndispositlon TO In
vcHtgnto. ...
Q.--Dld you ovcr ray to Col. Grafton you
would iuaiHt on having Mrs. Marsh auhprnaol
Al certainly did not. I faaw Col. Grafton, who
admitted ho was 1niataken In hia narrative on
that point. 1n al matIotB purtalning to this sub
jcct was particular nos to have my name mon
tlonct.
The nisnesa romssked That he had never said
AnythtnH pro1uaicial Of anJ member OF tho Com
mittco, In aty why, slape, or manor.
In reply to q question by hfr. Dauford, Witness
said ha thought hu had conversation With
Clymor tho night after tho resolutions concern
lug Delknap wero presented 10 tho HouHc. Tho
wltneRB tho night before lad . conversation
With Mrs. MaEal. on tho subject Of
rENpLEroNs CASE,
when Hho epoko about al interview sho had with
Mrs. BoknAp. She repeated In nubstanca that
tho matter connected with tho Kentucky Central
1lailyoad, In which case sl.o wns supposed to
havo received s70,o00; "bnt," said Mira. BEL
knsp, - / did not rcccivo 7U,001."
Mrs Marsh wcro in the elty when on Thursday
night ho mado tho communication to hIr. ely
ner.
In rop>y to q question By Iii. Robbins, tho
Witness said, from tito imFreaeion AffB. Matall'a
communication left on his mind hGts. Bolhnap
tac,tly admitted that money had passed. to her
hands, but no amount Taa uhtned.
Q.--Whae was your Inference
h.--hlrs. Marsh loft mo to draw my Inference
and leaTc you to tlraw yours. [Ianghser:l
MR. G1NA1N,
correspondent Of tho Now fotk Sun. testified
that ns soon na tho Information concerning Pom
d!oton reached Cvmcr, ho At onco commenced q
search for tnfortnation. Tho Witness, At Tho TO-
quasi Of C!ynlor. neaisted In this work. Cymor
showed tho utnoss au2iu.y to obtain all tho
factB In tho case.
1ecces.
4. Il. NANBo3.
formerly 6ecrotary OF tho Koutucky Centrul
Railroad Company, toetflled that, in tho spr1ng
Of 1865, ho mado m effort 70 collect tho claim.
by arrangement with tho Company, llo waa 10
rocotvo Is per cont, buk, after much labor and
soJourn in Washington for three months, ho
won't homo without having effected settlement.
pondloton. however, succeeded in collecting tho
claim in Juno, 1871, after ng1eoment Or contract
with thoae Interested in 1t. When Pendleton 1o-
turned to Cincinnati, ho gave Kansom 510, 600
on account Of tho lattor's former connection
With tho claim.