The New York herald., 1876-11-09
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBRRs.
Nv Judge Lawrence,
by Juugc LHNTtHCt,
ys. kcYSer. SEQ rule ).

Shook w. Kcyser-sce rule s.
isaacs vs. Baer farrneton vs.. Pope; Yates VS.. Gid
dinas; Higgins VS. LORD; Wilkinson Va Baker; Porte.
Barrett, lie Luncr vs. lie Llmel.-Orders granted.
Greene ". Actwya. The National Shoe and Leather
Manhattan Telegraph Company. Matter OF
Aander; McManus vs.. Reilly wyse vs. kent Booth
The Hart Manufacturing Company, Sivey
spcer Morgan VS.. Tweed, Jr, Grant vs. Tweed, inc
Graniie Railway Company VS.. Pa.tison; Nuisson VS.
National Shoe and Leather Bank VS. Foerschcimcr;
schnciusr vs. wotton Mason Us. Hall; Thur6er vs
Potter Bsoram vs. ,o waenonss; R,s, Tno Greem nnrm
stcinhardI Blossom: The North American Lilo
Insurance. Company vs. McCool Woiii, Jr, W Hamei;
Matter OF opening Knesbridee road; The Union Dune
Savings Bank Forster; Hill vs.. konh; Matter OF
Pabst. McGulre VS. Cameron; Cary vs.. Cary; Tho Ger
mania Lie Insurance Company vs.. hcleand; Hard
Ing vs.. Harding; Townsend vs. Roe; he Morrsania
Savings Bank vs. Richards, Earle vs. Duryea Hill VS.
Riss; Sherman sherman; Davies; Haws vs.. o'Neili;
Booth VS.. Booth ct al Post vs. Jlch and Merriam vs.
Demarest-Granted.
Zittcl W. Hamltou-Notion granted
Ammcr VS.. Smms.-see rule "a
Babbt, VS.. h-Explanaton required, rule
lie Roy Reppcr.-Granted. See memorandum
Perkins ct al VS. The Mobile and Ohio Railroad Com
pany.-BanKs in the proposed Judgment must be sup
phcd.
Ma..er OF Moorc.-I think there should be referee
Enos VS. kmbail-Blanks must he 1cd up
Jcssup vs. Barne't-ihe notice OF the motion is not
Bets vs. vys-, Jr.-Granted. SEQ amendment to
section 500 1876.
Earl VS.. Malls --hcrc must DO a reference. Re-
fcrrcd TO II. X. Beekmon.
Tho Northampton Cutlery Company VS.. Rowe-Mo-
ton granted but surety need only be given in the sum
OF 500
Tucker VS.. Livngston.-Beiorc making order
desire to sec the piead,ngs.
Furncss Post-Motlon that tho plaintiff file Sc
surity costs is granted, &c.
Hazel VS.. Marks.-Malter referred to Marco Dicen-
dor Esq, to take proofs and TO report the same to
the Court with his opinion thereon.
The Mutual Lie Insurance Company Craighead.-
ucg iara Of Lee
now sought to be filed, was inadvertently omIttcdr
L. Roy VS. Repper-upon examining the papers IN
this case, find no reason for denying tho defendants
request tnat his father should be appointed the guar
dian dd hfem.
Copying vs. Coppins-.y am unwilling to confirm
the referees report. 1t does appear that the
marriage was unlawful under the laws o New Jersey,
and as plaintiff although over eighteen years OF
age at the Time OF his marriage, waited from the year
ls70 until the year 1876 before moving to annul the
marriage shall require some lurther evidence as TO
the cxerted upon the plaintiff before confirming
tho report
By the attorneys for all the parties the action Rule
s3 prevents me from appointing the referee us sug-
Ecs,cd.
Matter OF Stuyvcsanf f-Rcferenco ordered Memo
Toner vs. Tho Mayor, &o-Mcmorandum :or counsel.
Humcs VS.. Beare. do not the allowances asked for
in this case exceed tho aggregate sum authorized by
The recent amendment to the Code?
Biohm Sussoaum.--Motion denied Memoran-
dun
Nchnish vs. Goldccke Motion to place cause on
Reuter- vs. Reuter-. .--Memorandum.
Toner vs. The Mayor, &c-Motoa 6nnicd Memo
randum
Circuit calendar for Friday, November ~ 1876 Men,
orxndum.
hi va ThL--Referred back 10 the rcierco to take
fur,ner testimony. Memorandum.
by Judge Larrcmore
Matter OF the Departments OF Public Works, &c.
selAtivs to tho opening OF new avenue Sc--Re.
port confirmed
.rrtdwcil VS. Pomcroy.-.Allowaucc OF 1850 granted
COMMON PLEAs--srxcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van BrunL
Waterman VS.. Tho Aayor.-oomplains dismissed.
sarah Hopper VI. Phillip Hopper Divorce granted
plaintiff.
Jardine va Payne, Faiion Va StrasburgeE-M Motions
Lorey vs. FrankeL-Alotion granted plaintiff to have
leave 10 amend summons upon payment Of costs OF
motion.
abide event see memorandum.
In the matter OF UndcrhilI-comuissioner ap-
pointed
granted tcrms- See memorandum.
Perry VI. Perry --Notion denied without COSTS
Leave rcnew alter the defendant has recovered her
In the matter OF sagc-Reror. confirmed. See
Morris Va Hicr-scs opinion.
By Judge ]. y. DAILY.
vanderpocI vs. voikcnning.--seo opinion.
Rosenstsi va Koscps, n.--Urdcr sgncd.
samuels vs. sturman Counsel may attend at cham
bers on Monday, Novcmbsr H. at haif-past ten A. H.,
70 argue motion for trial
By Judge Van Brunt
In tho matter OF Sntcs Order granted
By Judge Z. T. Day.
rriediandcr VS. Harris Order dissoving Injunction
SUPERIOR coURT--srEcIAL TERM
By Chief Judge Curtis
Aguew vs. Keith ct al tSo. 81; Agncw w. Keith CT
si no. 4L-Motions that answer OF Minor n. keh DO
svsrraisd - frivolous, and that oi Emily keih DC