New-York tribune., 1876-05-05

$500 100000 TO S5OOOOOOOO. and the time during
which they are to run from 10 TO 30 years.
CLOSE OF THE EMMA NINE HEARING.
GEN sCHENCK AND Mr.. PARK MAKE A NUMBER or
VIGOROUS DENIAIs-MR. LYON DEFENDs HIS
CHARACTER.
GENERAL PRESS DIsPATCHl
WAsHIYGrON, May 4.-Gen. Schenck was
again before the Committee Foreign Affairs to-day
Mr. Chittenden his counsel said that the absence Of
Gen. sehenck yesterday. II. A. Johnson testified that
during an excitement in the Emma Mine shares he saw
the carriage and also the General himself at tie Office Of
Routh Co.. or Of Duncan Reid, brokers. Mr. Johnson
had also stated that Gen schencks presence there was
talked about in London and remarked upon being
very improper for American Minister Mr. Chttenden
asked the General: " Il this statement truef
Gen. schenck replied: "The whole statement is en-
trsy false do not know any such brokers Duncan
Reid or Routh Co.; have been at the Office Of
broker in London my life; have, however, been IN
the Office OF MeCuliOch Co., Morton Rose Co., Barring
Brothers, the selgmans, and perhaps Others; TO my
knowledge have been in what is ca led the City
OF London, except when going to Guild Hail to the
Lord Mayors, when, instead OF going IN my
riage which would be unsafe in the streets,
took cab or hanson or brougham; far Johnsons
statement is concerned it is unmtgated saschood"
Mr. Chttenden called Mr.. Park TO the stand, saying
that Mr. Lyon yesterday had produced two articles which
and related conversation which be said took place be-
tween Mr. Park and Mr. Fisher which the former was
represented saying that Albert Grant about pre-
pairing Of these articles, and that Mr. Park wanted
Fisher also TO So and that afterwari Mr. Park told
Lyon that the publication of these articles cost him
$500, and call $50 shares OF stock. and that
1900 copies OF the papers containing these
articles were procured. Mr.. Park said there
was not word Of truth in the statement
MI Park denied Lyons statement about their init
macy; he never sent for Lyon IL his lfe Lyon fire.
qdenty called at his room, but came III differently
irom other persons Park was suspicious OF him from
the first; Lyon never told him that this Emma Mine
business was national calamity Lyon the last
W mink 30 he could make money by II he told
MI Lyon that the Emma Mine exhausted.
az answer to question by Mr.. Chittenden, Mr.. Park
'" 'na' ly on had made claim against Senator Stew
u" MI fark instructed Mr.. eager his agent not TO
Pay MI Lyon unless he executed three papers,
nSHcS' one releasing all claims the Emma
ou'er Mine Company, another releasing all
0.Aini against Stewart, and q third releasing AZ
e"ul against the former Of the mine /;
MT Park instructed Mr. Phelps TO prepare the papers
.hd after the papers had been executed by Lyon Mr.
osser pad him the money. In answer TO Mr.. Chtten-
uens question: whether he had any part whatever r the
preparation Of Gen Schencks letter OF resignation as
ueeor OF the Emma Mine Company Mr.. Park replied he
ony suggested that Gen schenck should give the true
grounds OF his resignation, which were not that he was
dissatisfied with the property the management OF
WIN DIS associate directors but thnt he resigned because
nc desired to avoid criticism every word the compo
nton OF the letter Cen schenoks the copy OF Cen
ecaencks resignation, produced in his Parks) hand.
writing was not prepared by him the original draft
NORA single word oft was hls IL was q copy.
representative Monroe-What did you mean by saving
70 Lyon after you had seen INC first letter that YOU
wanted better onet MI. Park--Iyon's statement is
false.
representative Monroo--Iiow 10 you explain your In
efnneations in what you say copy tho letter Of
ssnationi Mr. Park-I only know that the ntellinea-
o"' are mine, "a might have made mistake in copy
n MI Park further said that Mr.. Lyon Is unworthy OF
ne' ana no reputable man who knows him you'd come
ssiofe the Committee and sustain him.
Lyon wished to say in defenss his character that