The New York herald., 1876-02-11

Rell. rorrens Va Zabniski PheIanvs Collender Stew
art Stewart st al, pIngee vs. Irving, The Mayor,
&c vs. Wood; French Abenheim, Jones va Steven
SON Fischer vs. Lent Moller vs. hoiler Hickman VI.
Tuttle, Doyle VS.. TIE Mayor, &c Fellows Va Eel
SANFORD vs.. White Bond OF guardian approved
BiddlemAn VS.. Eutridge. Motion denied without
costs Memorandum
Rothschild va Forty second Street Railroad Com
pany-The amendment asked for will be granted upon
payment OF costs OF the action up to the present time
and $40 costs OF motion.
Covert Hernenberger.-I shall allow plaintiff TO
serve his complaint upon payment Of costs OF motion
70 defendant; order may be settled on one days notice
allowed Memorandum.
seibt VS. Bauer ct aL-Surety's name written over
an erasure
Burden Farmers Milk Company want the
order in this case.
HolacEer vs. oBrien.-As il appears that one OF the
sureties in this case is OF doubtful responsibility,
think that the judgment should stand security De-
fault opened on that condition
Hughes Paraf-Motion denied without costs
Memorandum.
FIRST National Bank OF Cincinnati VS. Renick and
another.-rhe only order which l can make in this
case is an order vacating attachment
MARITIME vs.. Lowenstein. Motion for stay granted.
No costs OF motion.
Tnest VS. woodburn Silver Mining Company Of
Nevada-An allowance OF 500 granted TO the
plaintiff
Grant VS. Cooper.-I do not think that is a case in
which a reference should be ordered 1t should be
tried at the Special Term, and II the decision thoro
should be IN favor of the plaintiff referee then be
appointed 10 take and state the accounts between the
parties under tho circumstances disclosed by the
PLAINTIFFS aidavits No costs will bo allowed on this
motion
Weimes VS. weimes Allowed
Gulck Waters Motion 20 change place of trial
to Orange county denied, with $40 costs
Burden Farmers Milk Company. The order OF
Justice Barrett requires two sureties. bond with
three suretcs who do not justify IN the sum OF So 600
is not in compliance with the order
Lewis VS.. Gill Will grant an order 10 show cause
gunmell VS. Daley -Explsnation required.
bronchial Joelsohn-I do not appoint IN referees
in supplementary proceedings
Phillips VS. Cudipp.-hotfon denied with $40 costs
TO the purchaser Memorandum
Uulman vs. Haas-Motion denied without costs.
Matter of opening Eleventh avenue.-Referred 10
Hon. william Mitchell to take proof, &o, Memofan-
dunn
Ksmer VS.. zwickert-Ex parte order must be re-
vosed and the motion TO ne security for costs granted
Memorandum
Metropolitan Savings Bank VS.. FitzsImmons.-Mo-
tion denied with $40 costs to Geerey. Memorandum
SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM.
By Judge Lawrence
Barnett Us. BGrnott-ln this case wish to have
reargument
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Spe,r.
Reilly vs.. Her ct aL-Motion donied without costs
BY Judge Sanford
Tying vs. Marsh ct al-Motion granted
Brown vs. Sohwarn ct al.-Order settled.
Judgment ordered.
COMMON PLEAs-sPECIAL TERM
BY Judge Van Brunt
Morris Morris; Jacobs Jacobs; Richard VS..
Lebert.-Memorandum of decision,
Le Bronsh We. Lynch DerlIn vs. Costello ct a.-ho-
tion denied, with $40 costs.
Sage VS. Verm1ys OF al. Clark VS.. Corcoran.-See
memorandum.
Thorp OF al VS. Portington ct al opinion.
Abbott VS. Abbott-Referees report confirmed and
divorce granted TO plaintiff
BY Judge Robinson
Crowell vs. CrowelL-Divorcc granted to plaintiff