The Ottawa free trader. [volume] (Ottawa, Ill.) 1843-1916, 1876-10-21
The Circuit Court,
CRIMINAL.

taken up a week from next Monday, and are asI
follows:
People VS. Manning. Stealing Blakc's watch.
People VS. John Henry Smith Rape.
People VS. Edward Masters. Picking Rugcrs
pocket at fair grounds.
People VS. Wright ard Ward. Larceny.
People VS. Ann Reed-"Quccn Anne"-bigamy.
DISPOSED of-G. People VS. James Falon. Lar
ceny 80 days in the county jail!
o. Same VS. Patrick Ward. Recognzancc. Sc
curity called and defaultcd and conditional judg-
ment and sci a
II. Same VS. John Henry Smith Recogniz.
ance for rape Dcfaulted and conditional judg.
ment and sci fa.
IS. Same VS. Halvor Thompson. RecognizanceI
to keep the peace.
IS. Same vs. Albert Bernard and Herman Brum-
ly, Selling liquor. Continued.
IS. Same VS.. George Kelly. Larceny. Con.
tinued.
q. Same VS. John Harter. Selling liquor with
out license. Not guilty.
Continued.
20. Same VS. Dennis Fitzgerald. Appeal Dis
missed for want OF prosecution.
SO. Same VS. Nicholas Ridingcr. Larceny. Plea
of not guilty and sentenced to three years In thcI
penitentiary.
"a. Same vs. Thomas Murphy and Edward Mas.
tiers. Larceny. Defendant Murphy plead guilty
and sentenced to 80 days in the county Jail.
So Same VS. John Douglass. Larceny. Plea Of
guilty and sentenced to year in the peniten-
tiary.
WbaInu Rain a ed n n the
docket and mol pros'd.
COMMON LAW.
II. James johnson vs. The G X IL Il Il %.
Case. Dismissed by plaintiff.
10. Rachel Neustadt, ADMINISTRATIVE late of
Morris Ncus tadt, deceased. Case. Continued,
%. Samuel IIurd VS. Charles Ferguson. APP.
peal. Continued.
50. John Kinzen VS. Mary A Eppcrlc. At.
tachment Dismissed by plaintiff.
IS. Andrew Smith VS. u W Dumond. Tres.
pass Dismissed by plaintiff
&c. NJ Rowe VS. the o O& FEW RRCo. As.
sumpsit. Dismissed by plaintiff,
III q S Eldredge and Il d Lyman VS. A W
Cavalry ct al. Trespass. Dismissed by plaintiff.
100. John Smith VS. Michael Trainer. Assump-
sit. Continued.
1870. Orrin G Town Us A II Greenwood. Assum7.
sit. Dismissed
ls2. Haskins IL Byrnc vs. Henry Meadows. As
sumpsit. Dismissed.
POS. + Lincoln VS. Isaac f Dyer ct al. As.
sumpst Dismissed.
200. Michael Trainer V, Margaret and Bridget
Smith Case. Continued.
26i. Garden & Bruce VS. MAIDS Christensen. At
,ocb,pcnt Judumnpt for S,pO and
300. Frederick Minke vs. Samuel began. As
sumpsit. Judgment for SAT- "a and costs.
3T2. Farral & Wheeler VS. Daniel Simons. As.
sumpsit Judgment for $55 and costs.
3S7. Marshall X Odds vs. Otis White. Case.
Dismissed by plaintiff.
3s9. W II Il D Phillips VS. G W Ravens and j
f McKinlay Assumpsit. Judgment for SlliO 80
and costs.
800. Daniel Mills VS. Abel Hogaboom. At.
tachment. Dismissed by plaintiff,
396. II b Haynes VS. Thomas Goldman. Appeal.
Dismissed for want Of prosecution.
IA. Nicholas, Shepard & Co VS. Louis Soulc et
al. Assumpst. Judgment for $2l6 G3 and costs
435 Thomas Roberts VS. Thomas + Sheeban.
Assumpst. Judgment by confession for 81 Sc
and costs.
Al. Daniel Sullivan VS. Michael sullivan. APP.
peal. Dismissed for want Of prosecution.
AS. Isaiah IL Goodng VS. w NJ Smith. Appeal
Dismissed for want Of prosecution.
474 Newton G Gallagher VS. w NJ Smith. Ap.
peal. Dismissed for want Of prosecution.
George Irwin vs. Silas Goodcll. Assumpsit.
Jury trial.
81. John Stout vs. Chas II Force ct al Case
continued by agreement
SO. Chicago Il Alton II Co VS. Samuel II
Bradford. Trespass. Dismissed by plaintiff
fl Ernest ) Tanner VS. WIN Lanner. Appeal.
Continued.
AZ c Il Alton X r Co VS. S II Bradford. APP.
peal Appeal dismissed by appellant. Proce.
dendo, judgment for costs.
so William McKinstry VS. William Callahan
Appeal Continued by agreement.
81 Henry Oreige VS. James Higgins. Tres
pass. Plaintiff called and suit dismissed fol want
Of prosecution.
Sc Chas A Smith ct al VS. Leo staunnet. APP
peal. Appeal dismissed by defendant Procc.
dendo. Judgment for costs.
IS William Davidson VS. Louis Gage. Assunp.
sit Pleas Of defendant Withdrawn by defendant.
Defendant called for non-appearanc". Damages
appraised by court ut sS2s.01 and judgment
therefor and costs
10 Peter Donohue vs. John IIoclger Tres.
pass. Continued by agreement.
40 John a Porve VS. Geo II Rugg. Appealed.
Appeal dismissed by defendant. Proccdendo
Judgment for costs.
So W Il Milligan vs. David Crumyille. Appeal.
Appeal dismissed by defendant Procodcndo.
Judgment for $500 damages aud payment OF
costs.
So, Al Thurber ct al '. Francis Singer. Appeal
Trial by jury. Finding for plaintiff and damages
assessed at $S3. Judgment therefor and costs
"a. Milton Hicks VS. James Jones. Appeal
Plaintiff called aud suit dismissed for wan; o.
prosecution.
IS. William Gilman Va Burrell johnson. Ap
peal Trial by Jury. Finding for plaintiff anC
damages assessed at sl97 81