, 1876-07-14

nccortiln, to tic law Of Eugnnd Is shown. rhis
nppi!ea frrifly III the case IT political oilcers
Is EGa,t cct n fss hy bs pa n.s M
the oflcnsc specified III treaty. but estah!lshng
an offcf1ae tsf that na'ne aeeofdlng 10 the law
Of the surrcntlcrinE country, Is tn prevent the
surrender y: pe1sons on t. charge o. ei1e nc, o.
facts considered Icre establishing political
offchsc, nnd nut for tic crime for which the sur
relllcr was lnaalc. The autreniefing culln-
X Eye,he; a'I The nazs %sns ~ i res'ee
FisI,'s assurance that no Administration darc
Violate the rights Of political asylutn by obtain.
Ing prisoner on one charge mud trying him Tor
ncy. General cannot interfere whci, tic oiensc
Is committed nRalntt the law Of any one State,
This ast q Congress- of Aug; l2, 1913 (Chap. Y,
sse shows the eostfucaon put IN the treaty
Lord Derby briefly reviews the negotiations In
1871 1872, aid 18Th, and says: Tho violation
IN tho case nf lfeffbr0nn wis not the act Of Iicr
hatcsty's Government, but II regretted y. Tie
t'oycr'in'cnt believes that TIC United States Is
actnated BY einecTe desire to maintain the
rights which, in their Judgment, arc demanded
by the treaty Ut fS4a, anil tllcy wish the aAmc
constructor, put oil Engand's inottves.,.'.
The note dcplorcs The Misunderstanding be-
tween The two Governments, and says tl!e Brit.
tsh Government u rcady To join the United
States IN negotiating new treaty.
COMMENT.
LoNpoK, Iuty f4.-The Standard this morn
tng reviews Earl Dcri'y'a note favorably to the
ItrIttsh argument, aud .rcpud!ates the sugges-
tluh TINT England cntleayorcd to enforce her
construction Of tho treaty by menace. Tic
Standard concludes: "We run see nu serious
obstacle except Mr.. Fislfs tll.alviscd punctilio
] to tic Immediate negotiation of new treaty:
| The common-scnse interest and aelf-respect u
both countries dctnanl speedy arrangement" !"
LospoE, July ~ q; III. Tile T1m<.. reviews
ft{17 9hN 1rn lar E{uthE nj mt
to be easily rcpcl1ed, but where he psssea
70 the substance Of the question, Ut issue
a4,i r hare. tS st folow ,!m,., h! With th
Gofai ;n we eot snsS o 'ue
9. calm review Of the circumstances, Will agree
that II d new treaty ts to bc framed the pr}ncl.
| pies which Secretary Fish was willing to ncccpt
In 1872, 1873, and 1871 may be taken a. basis
! vigorously"
THE ALBERT dRAET awiNDLE.
| LONDON, July 13.-ln tho Court Of Common
Pleas to-tuy tho casu Of Twycr0ss ". Albert
brought to recover money alleged to have been
obtained by fraudulent representations fegar1.
Ing tho Lisbon Stcaln-Tralnway Company. II
was test case. There are IghtYFejglt others
verdict for Twycross for E7oo, being The
amount clafmcd. Judgment stayed
I THE FRENCH p0I.tCY.
VERSAILLES, July 13.-ln tho Chamber o.
Deputies to-day, the Due Dc Cazcs, Minister 81 q
regard to Eastern affairs, said tho Government
wished that France might not bc involved II
events abroud III such manner as could posatb1,
hinder the restoration Of internal peace. Franc'
It % s our M part to ' associate ourselves WITH an,
ciEnrts made to preserve un understanding be
tween Powers. THIS understanding abaoiltel.
c1tsts, aud Is founded on bash
wo cannot but accept With satisfac
| Inn. nnmn1Fs f1ttt1.jnfk krV1nftnf. 'fh}