New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1876-12-19
orrIoIAL JOURNAL or rnx srArs Or lqufsIAnA.


sess,os tho p'a'ntin can not biarg : ps,itory
Il; s.si ysSn CRAM sppsllset . =. George s s
e5ooo., vsrdist Sf Ssoe ~ for Ssssnasat. kven Il
sna I. seizure xss in acesrdsncS With 9. 2. ss1.
no cSnust hs s
eust 'ine'. yudgmenf a1nulled. sl- >,
.o esse y. Mrs na.y supply 81 IaetoTs ,,.n, :nd
| FROM Fifth strict Cou,t The fault 81 esr, ing
tie citations on her attorney i.seed Of Piainsaa M
Sezhefs ". Soue, decided Janusry, 1876, ct yet
reports act No IS section eleven. extra sess on
81 So s's sss s. Notion l. s:a':: de-
70. 1883. Ross Epstein, app=l'aut. VA Mutual and
District Court. On polcv o. 5000 The policy
became void on failure o pay the assessment The
failure TO receive notice was not the full OF the
No 6zl2. s;ste vs.. William Remps. George Schlcs'
| singer. appellant. and BY coppersmith.- Robbery
No e3ss. State ex rel Thomss Carey, appel ant,
vs. va John Barron:-R ON Superior Distdct Court
The p9we. 1f tie Govern"r n sS remove e. tax col q.
absence the Lieutenant Governor exetcises his
powers; const. La, art 50. Judgment aaa,m-d.
No. saol. JOSEPH iis1,H H. Mitchell, executor appel
Court John Lise: .s!s deesast a. owed defendant e
-
Hogan Of 5000 as security. Defe ndant did mot
asm.ssd nsas
sa,s is to recover from Levy the aid. renee q
ton wa, raised in tho succession Of Li>lea The
Of Chef IadeS
No. ssv7. william Bosel w. Teutona National
noch Lot N
proml ~ note for 5000 drawn by J. y. wagney,
who w.s Bogcl's agent snd cashier Of tie baok,
to
he shonld recover, is woald BE- without any con.
waqn as left the State. Judgment reversed.
No. CASA. Loui.iana s a'e Lottery Company ys.
any ou. sSs IL ~
Judeme eut for $500 and interest. The iudenent
and d allows an sppess. Motion ts difn'ss appeal
No. Sos. }. A. Donnally 4 Son ve Mercbans g.
Dsss Css19 rosy ,sehs 70
cairo. The check line not paid for Wss mot in:
suEe6, but It wss u6ea in deesnaaatA' fervtcs and
-1or . hat not to carry ereaoss. g Peter', 81.
Freight was incurred to $3.50 and el27o was in
No. 5lss. Jury & Hs,r W. MS. Mary J. a"id OF
a., appela .ts.-From Fourth srict Court The
supp les for which the suit 10 brought were cent
~
when she msrfied she ordexed the account to hsr
hu .bard's nam'. Prescription had NOT run. Judg
Justice WHY disser t.. ....-,.-..-.
No. slfs Mrs.. Barbara Litter appellant, vr. Mrr
Maria de SAbstta.-Fr0m SiSth District Court: see
Clandel Palao; opinion book as iolio sec. Judg-
| No. a2s7 x uis Parker V. Shropshire Aader.
son. appe'lante.-From Fiith Dist i;t Court. See
| same case; 26 ,z7. Judgment reversed.
-se 4 BY JUsfsCH' LEONARD.
No. 6}S7. Succet sion OF FRA co.'s Lacrox on ques-
I nj hofY Marie Camille AnOQtIqUG -
| From Secon district Court Franoo4s kdgar La
croix i, admitted to be the legit mate sou Of de-
toned. There is evidence Of tie ceremony aud
her n0he, = M
4a0; 26 A., 81. 1t is claimed that the marriage in
1869 between white woman sni maa Of color
G. T. Of 1925. sl7 sctof March 81, 1881. Il 4s con-
saa e hs
| lii and 1lS. are h:esal traaslations OF the Code
napoleon. lbe presumpti n is she was ignorant
| then, bui must have known soon after. For au
! thorities on presumption on this see the French
authorities, but iguorantia legs yentinem sxcnsst
500; 80. There NO similar Gaze iu Louisiana.
| but as our law 10 taken from tho French code,
these autho; tiles should be cons9itsd - to the
the learned Justice The Civil Code, 34s2, seems "a
be in acco1dance with the latest. But by pubic
legitimate both by Francois and F. Edgar Lacrox.
| judgment reversed. appellant declared legitimate
AID entitled to the rights Of her fatb.E
| Chief Jus.ics Ludellng c0ncurs on the groun1 Of
Justices wyly and Morgan dissent.
No. $500. Folsom Brothers, appellante. VI. City o.
New Oresns.-FIom Superior District Court
damages caused May 6, 1873 The city is liable
rs iow is ,Stl fsy 3s % e; r,
ss se % of % sS
'.%ouns ss sss Is
a1med BY employs ,s ve 5egret that ne repre-; .e;
t1ts more ess:sei :.sssinS into 1sssss which
Of a. = the; .,, sssy af nSs
effort to ascertain for themselves the amount
Of the cty's liability. II might hayc been well
ths ir CLERKS more viserously 9th reeaad TO each
item Of loss charged in the statement Ae it y ~
Sctsd II Of these ss aceara.s
| and cnnciu.ive. Verdict set aside Judgment fol
e26ess, and i've per cent interest from Nay 16
Ju.tice Norgan eonsidsrsI the judGnsat should
rTr. 637S. George r. Brott vs. Eager. Rllerman 4
Co.. SD elante-From Superior District Court
| Iniunct on oa collection Of Wharfage dues. The
exception should have b. en- mAintained, and plain
ials, sr,icle - Levy ". Shreveport. - A., 60
| Judgment rsvere cd.
D. ricr Criminal Court Murder The indictment
is that the accused did ~ilfully, feloosously and
| Of Il 9 malice afoyeth0ueht kill and murder one
Marie Louise. a d is sufheient. 4. g. leAs. Judg
No e;S2. Sssfe e1 rel John R. Clay VI. George B
4udtS5 s0go5 Dis
No. $685. Bogart l. Gu;yer. appellants. VI. New
Orleans Park-Frow Superior District Court. Sui
TOR services as Iandscat architecte. Judgmeu
reversed. Decree for plaintiffs for $500.
I! Charles q. Kngour vs.. New bllssas Ga.likh
Company -Defe. eants petition for remsyal t. tn
dispute exceeds $500. and plaintiff i eitissn .
Ohio. Cause to ba shown December 22
Plan;e.s ct a!.~Petitioner prays fer 1856 Tor sci
| vicss in ra' sing crop Of sugar on Concord Plants
ton seized BY defendants, and now owned b.
Crescent City Live Stock taxdpg gar Slaughter
house Company vs.. Eugene DieffenI ha AID Mathia "a
p1aSs
against further violation of act Of March 8, lss
. / Injunction issued on bond Of $50:
privilege against properly purchased April 26. 1871
"a saS saVnss s vs. B. NJ Pond
sets: seae q june i ISL q ssoeS sses que Jans
: morsAge, AID prsSs judgment for 500 WI
+ Of seis1re and sals ~..,.,,,., soo,.+v po.h
j, reau 4 c.. Vs. b. F. Flanders hqu dator; Fscto
r and Traders Insurance Company 70. same. Co
soliaated. The Attorney O. nsral for the State
!. b. +. Flanlers iquidatol; that iu fav0r OF ROch
\ reau Z Go. Of $1,000 on nortsaye, and that
- favor of the Pastors and TraderI Insurance Col
pahy f0r 95OOO. first, because the court is wtho
q power to appoint lquidatog second, eecau
proceedings were ex part ;; third, want Of citatto
y executed BY power having no right to do 50, a,
n tho NOR, gage being Etven for cperty not belcn
- ing to m0rtgsgOT; nth, the notes we've pEescribt
= | 4th, that Tho jud gnort rendered on the rule
sell p operty wac in error ard illegal. for the II
son tha, the plaintiffs Obtained Judgments in p
| sonam agains. tue liquidator, q Ordinaire, =
q. | thel efors the seizure and talo should have be
s. sought uLder = whit Of feri faeias. Devolutive