The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-04
COURT NOTES.


Presentation. W. B. Woods. Circuit Judge.
United States vs. Ferdinand Dudenheffer.
Tf Esry ks ss Sf h f, m Vs. 1s Brown Co.
Tho Jury In this case having been instructed. on
the adjournment Of Court Yesterday. e bring II
the Clerk and read as follows:
I'VE. thf jury nna ior The defena a,,lt,, Mo-
bls and ohc h ali" this "e v on the
petition Of Georgia Warnes asking 10 be made
complainant. the Court ordered that she he per
ant, and is allowed 70 take rule against The
plaintiffs. who are the trustees and revolver OF
said reilroad, to shoY cause why the receiver
The ease p, Of the Unitsd states VS.. Obregcn. on
tho charge OF selling cigars without stamps Is
In the case Of the United states VS.. Bucna-
ventura Oregon the Jury brought In a verdict
p guilty. and he was sc9teneed to six months
leans, and 10 pay fine VI sioo and costs of court.
Rosalie Maenhaut ct H. vs., the city Of New Or.
leans. The following are the amendments, , Of
city oi New Orleans and the State bank author
ized, and u is their duty under the oct q the
r. 70 pay 70 and
TIE case of r. Fernandez. who sues y. \. fTar-
rison for 900 damaees, was sutmitted to the
they were 10 hand in sealed verdict to the
clerk Of the court.
Superior District. Court.
In this court b rule .w,.s flled by Edward Phil
pfer sSSf e of bsr Goa enea Hae
ner w. The Louisiana Mntual Insuranee Com
Dany TO d5s2lye n i9iuns.Y'nt Issued from the
Aforesaid suit IL tho Fiit6 District Court als9
enioining Thos: Duffy. tho Clerk q the Fifth
cree In said SUIT. until tho termination Of the
case Ia this court. On the 18th Of January. 1875,
the nP aa SAID Ss
sum Of 5000 The injunction was obtained by
Robert =. Howard. who. under q. fe. from the
netice some of the grounds Of the rule.
1. Said Howard had no. right Of action nor any
good aud legal ground for the issuance 81 said
Injunction, and shows no right nor authority to
reprosentth the Louisiana Mutual Insurance Com
this Court has exclusive iurisdiction, or the ro-
moval VI which to this Court 1t ran require.
b. That the Louisiana Mutual Insurance Com.
pany vas not Incorporated by any General
l. Thos. Duffy is subject alone to the. orders Of
the Judge OF the Court Of which he IL Clerk.
the order Of removal 70 this Court was taken
contra!ictorily with gil parties. Ihe auss-
ats Fl u he ss s"ss oa ' "''e
ssperior Criminal Court.
In tho case Of the State vs. Francisco. Lala,
charged With committing an assault with intent
e murder the, jury this morning returned YER
III The % case s s ~ liz state Vs. Lwrepoe Williams
q capital case-in which the defendant y accused
of breaking into the residence Of Richard Ter Ter
miiei to tho Jury. Verdict Guilty q break
iipe and entering 9 dwelling house in the night
Tho case Of The State vs. Gus Anderson,
saSrSss . Jury, without
In previous trial Of tho case Of Lawrence
Williams the verdict was unqualified and would
have consiEned hin 70 the ss,'ows this one
sumed this morning. and q verdict 81 not guilty
was rendered.
ina pSs s S2s1y Wv %nr and Msrs &
charged with petty larceny.
First District Court. ~
ArraIgnments,n Harrjgan; Harr,y M lc,,
and battery, were arraigned. and plead not
Andrew Hengton was sentenced 10 one days
imprisonment In tho Parrish Prison, having
'' The sS Sass u e 's ste S tSrsopher no
which was on trial Yesterday was again re.
SECOND District Court.
The following new Eeecosyi9Sns were opened n II
g es 9sM e,nr saS Niles n Ma as%oaa D'0r
rule to dissolve the Injunction Of the plain
till to prevent the sale Of certain property be.
longing TO the succession OF Halpin was on trial
In tho succession of Catherine Klein. wife of
A. Pgotti. the rule q JANUARY .. ls7s, Xns mads
Prison the tutor. Philip Kius. for len days
Third District Cosrt.
s. Korzarsky for use OF Martin Kcnopsky.
Tho Judgment of the lower court was affirmed.
Fourth District Court.
IN the case Of y. J. Berkery w. Om4teud K
Hickey. the rule herein filed by plaintiff Is made
absolute SO far as emitting plaintiff 10 the funds
na % h9 RIA ssr9sssS 9 the q sf and
r HauC ara dismissed with costs.
The motion 9or . new trial IN tl,e case Of Burke
vs.. Weaver IL being argued IN the Fourth Dis
Philip Hcboen w. Mr.. and Mrs. Heller and
Hugo Redwitz. This Is suit, leforea Jury for
th: sum Of 1880 which risanh, v ale wT s a,'
ance of two writs Of attachment. by which his
grocery store and coffee house, situated on the
closed and for some ai!nc held ny KEEPER of tho
Civil SheriD. Plaintiff shows that Mrs Heller
r. e. r ," sT Ss a%% w ana
Of attachments. which were set aside ~ THIS
Court as issued wrcn .h N.Y. H Hs, hs s s"
a9r dHa%sg9s w h s eary on Se b"nds II
said at,a = suits claiming these damages
Plaintifi obtained Q judgment on y verdict
ecfendants "in solido" for tho sum OF 5000
After that judgment the second writ Of attach,
c mess is and hence t4s pending suit.
time Of adjournment 81 tho court.
H. T. Berkery Vs. Olmstead kckCy-yudE-
ment in favor Of plaintiff, against J. N. Lewis
garnishse. for 800 with lien and privilege. a
recognized, but without lion and privilege. :.
Mra 81 Burk, testaInentary executrix w. Mrs,
r. H. Nash-Rule for n new trial discharged and
new trial refused. fH
Finn District Court.
Cecilia Mandry VIZ. Jean Beaufort, her hus-
band The default taken ON the 3lst Of January,
1916 was confirmed and made final. decreeinE u
separation Of property and dissolution OF the
isting between the said parties.
A new trial was granted In the case Of Madame
Decutr va her husband. $500
i. Haefner vs.. tho Louisiana Mutual Insur-
anco Company.--Tn this case q judgment was
rendered In this court on Jan. ~ 1875, Tor the
Under that Judgment q. fa. and garnishment
against Francisco and Edgard Lacrolx. and
against RobcrN s. Howard, Receiver Of the
Louisiana Mutual Insurance Company On
January n, 1875. on motion oil !. ". Thomas, rs
counsel for the defendant. an order was made
afterward annulled. transferring this cause to
the Superior District Court A. day or two ago
an Injunction was obtained by Robt. y, Howard
from tho Superior District Court and served.
sixth District Court.
The case OF Simmons VI. Moran. a suit on n
promjssory note ID on trial In this court. this
ease Judgment not written up, Tor the plaintn,
Braughn 4 Buck. in liquidation. w. Karl
(Chnrlcs) Default OF january ~. 1915: con.
flrmed for the sum OF $l32 % IN Inyor o. plaintiff
a. Rochereau 4 Go. W.. Etienne Poane-DeianIt
Of January 81. 1876. cOnilrmed Tor the sun Of