The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1876-04-07

MED by The defendant ann IS no, corfoous,.--
itself does not ente the defendant 10 vncatur, as
the Court does not try the aiidavit But in
view,of the confession OF criminal intimacy with De-
gaukoG. tesincd TO by Mrs. Desaukon, and denied IN
such doubtful manner; IN view, also, or the aver
mcnts ion Information and bclef) TO the birth OF I'm
LEGITIMATE child In Germany which TACT - not
squarely denied; In vicw TOO, OF the general probao
ties oil the case and the position In life OF the respect
I've parties think the BAH should be materially re-
duced. Considering what had been shown In mitigation
oil damage 81 900 would be reasonable amount, and
the bond is accordingly reduced TO that sum-
Newell vs.. NcwelLunlcss the facts stated in these
aiida,ils can be explained, and especially IN view OF
the letters alter marriage, should not, considering
the defendants positive denial of the charges against
him and the entire absence al proof feel Justified
In awarding temporary a;Inopy. Perhaps counsel
fee should be awarded referee to take proof rs 10
proper sum- But, upon the whole the faircst course
Is TO deny the motion without costs and with leave 10
renew further papers II the afidaviis cannot be
explained WILL upon that being represented make
moderate allowance TO enable the plaintiff 20 compcn-
safe her counsel In prosecuting the charges oi ncr
complaint
In the matter or Newman. Tho Court should retain
the injunction Tor sufficient length OF time 10 enable
the petitioners 10 procure the appointment OF com
mtiee anu to enable such committee 10 1ic proper
bill To set aside the conveyance, &C, and demanding
held from tho lunntic The motion, must therefore,
be denied without prejudice renewal IN there
should be further unreasonable delay In applying
for u committee or In the action OF such committee
when appointed. The motion to confirm the inquis-
ton rs OF course granted, and the parties may ake
II they desire H. the usual order OF reference 10 nom
nate committee and to pass upon tho security, &c
in accordance with the chancery practice
BY Judge Donoliue.
In the matter OF Speman.- Notion granted Memo
randum.
kormann vs. Falk ct aL-Motion granted
BY Judge Lawrence.
In the matter OF the petition OF the New York Prot
csiant Il iscopal Pubic Schoo'.-order granted.
Spiegehon vs. kccfl.-Grantvd.
SUPERIOR coURr-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Curtis
Burned vs. Tho American Popular Lilo Insurance Com
EMBELLISHMENTS motion 10 stay the plaintiffs pro-
coed ngs tins Court is granted upon the payment OF
pIanns costs, including costs Of this motion, with
leave the plaintiff 10 move 10 vacnic this case
any by the defendants diligently prosecute
their appeal in New Jersey and also with leave TO
either party alter the determination OF such appeal to
apply to tins Court for such further order may be
Just.
Daily VS.. Byrnc.-Ordcr settled and signed
Daily VS. Brown.-Orucr settled and signed.
Daily w. Byrnc-Same decision.
COMMON PIEAs--sPEcIAL TERM
BY Judge Van Brunt
Beaumont vs. Kcmpton.-0rder signed and stay
granted
Thornton and others VS.. The st. Paul and Chicago
Railway Company and others-0rder signed