Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1876-06-02
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
GEORGE W, II. SMITH
JAMES +. SMITH AND OTHERS.

-
IN ne c"c"" Cogrt(cr AenyomFY comfy, as
a CoWf q Eqa"y'
- -
VIE ObJbOI OF this SUIT IS TO procure
a decree eahceltlng The provisions OF deed
rom certain ueolGe ". dawson 10 GER
u'ln M"r3 r. Smltu' ate OF montgomery
county ueeoHS'u, tearing da'e we t"ehy-
lourlh uhy OF July, IN me year 'elghleen nun
area ana se'en'y-!hrte' excluding the com
plalnahl rom any rlght OF cur'rsf IN me landS
lhehHoueo anu ueseilueu III sa'd ueeh' ana te-
| lormine sa'u ueeu so as TO Nes' III we COM
pla,n"ht ms proper iegal estate ~ sald lands.
lne ol'I states that me complainant was me
""'"' "uso""u VI eelihn N''F S"lln,
~ , y. Mon 'ePlne'y county VINO uep1r'eu
,nls ''le sonle '''ne ia 'he year eighleen nun
uleu ""u eeYVn'9 -'o"i, pelhg ~ 'he ,lihe VI
nvi ue't,u s''4.u nla possesseu ol cer'"lh rem
vs'"'e, y luE "nu "eipR 10 sa'u couu.Ji which
| w $500 ~ '" ~ ~, y y, '"ln ueolse "
e ~ '! uv'u oV"t,us ua'e 'ne 'Nt"'y-
| ,uut'n Wy " ou'!, ~ 'he year e'gu'e'h nun
~, '.1 Z, .ei'l -tiifee, w ,epeiueu ""lonB
w 't,'iu ~ ~ y, s",d Mpn'spneFS county
~ H"er -. NO !, lollos iol %e', ana
Wn a, Is 50, Iuily described ~ sald deed.
no ~ ''uer suites tu"t oald ueeu cou-
."'ls /" 1,'use vN.iuu'ue 'ue So'Hp'"l"""t 'roin
' ,HS .'eue % .u''esy, "nu u my anu very
oIner r'sh' whatsoever IN ana 10 s"ld pro-
Pe5m,y
ne o'l, 'urlue1 suites lual III 'he yenre'pn-
'ee, uuu',vu "uu ~ u, -'our dne op'nP iN'n""'
salu WHe' 'he saio Mary ~ oWllh, was selHeu
ana possessed OF an unaiVld'd interest IN GER
,aih I'nus ,y'ug an ~ oeihg IN Louu9un c9uh-
,y,.'n ~ p'",ep' 'liEl"ia' "nien Sne VA" ~,
ner''eu I,o'' ne' 'Htnei anu h",uet, 1esse "nu
hirha h,ee' any ~ "h'en s'i,u hnulVlutu ~
terest, SO oe'ohsins 70 Tue shla MARY w. Sih''n
.ne compassionate as her a"iol hosoahu anu
me 'a'her oy htr OF lawi"l issue born hlEe
1au, uhuer 'he laWs u me o'ate ~ NiP'nl'
'heh eNls'lne' an ,uleres, as tenant ny we
cur'esN ihi'l"'e MAJ olli was n,vu IA ,ne
Cireul' Cour' OF Loudouh county, virginia.
'or sale Oh sa,u ANUS iof me purpose ol pr-
'l'ioh "ihoug tne par'leS enll'ie' theielV tn1V
decree was passed IN sara cause 'ot we s".e
Vi st'u h'uus 'n"t s"la ANUS were so,u Pu'-
seant 10 sno uecteei ana theSilafe o. Wy pro-
ceeds OF me SAFE OF SAID laEds to wmth Tue
sara Mary y, Sthl.h was enlltitu WINS ~ M
o'uer OF snlu o"ur' uireele" 70 ue lnNes',u ~
ihhus III montgomery county, harI Hnu, W
curing me litle 10 the saia Mhry y, olui'n
anu ner he'ts, S""Jec' 70 thesH'nF pn's MniV,i
her nnsohndi me complainant, had ~ ihe lana
w lrR'n'a sou uhdet me deeree o. SUI"
Oout' aH on "hlen WIN appear " reverence
to property eertlhed transcript OF me RECORD
o. s"ld ch"hcery proceedings ~ the I'feu,s
oonrt Tor Louuoun county, hleu win 'ne oi'l
as ~ mAnlo ~, no. D.
Inc OH iurther states that inc hhus men
l'oheu ana dseflpea ~ Tue atorcsala ueeu
rom 'ne said @eoree lawson 10 INC s"'a
Mary " 9lhi,h are ne sumo laius purchased
l9r me s"iu Mary y. shillh shder 'ne oleer %
we C',c"i, Dourt o. iouuouh county, 'n
gina, nerelhoeioFe referred 10. ana ~ WniVn
me money TO whieh inc complainant anu his
"ile' we shld Mary y. smith, were eht,lico
rom tne proceeds OF tue SAFE OF 'he ANUS ~
virginia was directed TO De invested, secur-
ing 70 'ne complainant me sauie r'sn's '""s
ne y, mau ~ 10, lne sa'o anus IA virginia:
Tue piIl i"tlhef slales mat some 'i'ne III tHe
year eighteen hundred ana HttF-uFe Tue COM
plalhant ana MS SAID WE TOOK possession OF
the salu lhhus SO p"fehasfd ana nVeo !"ge'h-
CT on 'he same, me complainant eulVf"ilnS
sara ltrn ana RAISING ms iamiiy tuefeon, uh
III some ume III me year 'lfhleeh nUnureu
ana seVehly-lour Wneh me said Mary - S"'l'p
departed ms me, lhiestHlei IeaVng INC com
pimihan'' her hnsoahd- surviving her ana VIC
following children, VIZ james i. Shlih,
Jesse u smith inlefnlnrried WIN cefl"lh
Vlrglhln a. Smill, Helen y Elein, ihternar-
ried WIN certain Charles +. billn, mary
NJ, lnierWnrflfh WIN . eettfln Jesse NJ NICE,
hobeft " omllh ahd Esleile nmlln ana
mai sometime IN me month OF Febrnniy, III
lhe year eighteen hhhdfed ana severn sly
the SAID Jesse H. Smti h departed ms llle, IN
tesinle, leaving surviving him his widow, the
children, VIZ Hattie Lee smith, Alice W
smith and Earl IL. smith
Inc plil TURNER slnies maj Tue sa'd hoperl
q smith Eslelle + smith latte lee Smi'h
aud Earl II. Smlh are lhiahts under the age
OF twenly-one years.
me pm charges mat alter the dealh o. me
snld Mary ~ smith me complainant son,
me sald Jhmes !. Smilh, TOOK possession o.
SAID tarm ana competed The complainant 70
lcaVc me SAME ana mas ever flhce prevented
the complainant rom exercising any rights
overs said property, claiming ina, under the
provisions OF said deed the complainant had
no interest or estate whatever in said binds
The bill further charges hat the complain
ant was not present when the said deed from
the said George W Dawson was executed and
delivered to The said Mary II smith; That ne
knew nothing OF It's prov isions, 10 fact was
ignorant Of IFS very existence until atler The
death o. his said VIE; that the clause ~ said
decd excluding the c0mplalnanps right OF
curiesy IN said lands was inserted without
his knowledge, prlviiy OF consent is IN fraud
Of the compannnl's rights, IN violation OF
the orders Of the Circuit Court Of Loudoun
county Virginta, directing the investment Of
the funds Of the complainant and his said
wue ~ amos ID MARY iahd ana o. me express
terms Of the contract for the Pnreha OF said
lands made by the complainant and his said
wife, ana IS ihercfore null and VOID, ana that
the complainant has life estate IN The lands