The Cairo bulletin. [volume] (Cairo, Ill.) 1872-1878, 1876-09-06
HAYES PERJURY.
Tho Boomerang that Made
Wound.
New What VIII tWcte NivheVa'.
Nephew uoc


R,,ONNE,N,;,
kgsENc\t. a.. sept . When The re
puhlsNSn pr,>> ~ New \ oyA started iBAt
b0gSNoo aa,,at toy. rNl,n committing
lstlurV IN c,Nauts,lCu With NlS iGtN,Uly
away hSck IN l>S[. thty lUJlc dVSmcd
They were tArNNlD2 a oN,MCVAny ttSJ
Na It's rS,;era Nouli completely An,stA
;.,c wind Osst NJ ;RriS own NJ, R,NhN
nSNc> bat >,gcb SD CVVN, hS> ,snsC ~
PASS, tNe,U}c> = >y,S2 ~ ~ 4 trade, Ia
yyS,se tlscvc an >Nysr t,cS osscy>. ltU'
y olec, SGs wlsCa sbc organs ~ the
S.N,eSN >Asri hNNC cNVlNyN3 az The account
&. .isclG TAiSc thClg NC,ty'> and inform an
CNpcVtSut NUt.lt HON mach they Src
2rcSf. NCsr correspondent. >Ajvni>h-
lug shout ONO. 0DoYpCd into Fremont.
the home ~
UNU-E SlEEHNEp'> NEPHsW
to-day, AnG in tbs coarse 81 his pvramhA-
laiion> slapped INTO the coarl house.
The L7r.hcvn Of the Republican iold hay
Ing set the rNamplc. depoucni asked
leave to scan the public records. Sni he
hadn'i been engaged al the t,l>A a great
while before he became literally peirited.
Could he trust his own eyes: What
Rulhy Hayes. the good. the piou>, the
all that is eninently respectable. a per
jurer, a swindler. aud that not away
back in l>t3, but again and again as late
as 1874, 1915, AID 1876: Yes. verify. I'M
less the record Of Sandusky county Is a
lie, and such thing is
NOT TO RE SUSPECTED,
Gov. Hayes is fraud of the worst des-
Cription, "A penurious cheat. aud that in
the face of q great fortune that came 10
him literally without an effort. Blu; TO
the facts. Old Sardis Birchard. GOV.
Hayes uncle, died in January, 1874, leav-
ing his nephew all his property. esti-
mated at valuation varying from $3.50, =
900 to $1,000 Aside from this he be-
queathed about $4,000 TO various par
ties. most of them distant relatives.
Uncle Orchard WAS
NONE 100 LIBERAL
In his estimates, but the last time he
listed his property under oath the total
reached the figure of S9,JS2. This was
in 1873. In 1874. Gov. Hayes having
come into possession OF every particle OF
his uncle's personal property. to which
all he had previously held in his own
name must be added, listed the total at
S2,53l. The following year, 1874, with
out having made
ANY SPECIAL ADDITION,
lie returned total of S6,l20, and last
year, in spite of the addition OF a 500
piano, OF which no mention is made in
his return whatever, though specifically
required by law, he reduced the total to
S5,260. Now note the items. Gov.
Hayes had received a considerable for
tune from his wife added to which was
the great wealth Of his uncle, whose
ready cash at the time of his death
is estimated at from $50, 600 TO $4,000,
and yet
THE CONSCIENTIOUS CHRISTIAN
Returned under the head OF money a
grand total of 800. The two following
years he went himself precisely $500 bet
ter. Is it not curious coincidence that
he should have been worth for two years
on a certain day just precisely the same
sum, to-wIt: $500 in ready cash: In the
line of watches he returned one in 1874
which he valued at $500. The
following year the value Of this time
pece was reduced to 5000, and the same
this year. Now II is known that
UNCLE BIRCHARD HAD A WATCH
Left to Gov. Hayes by will. Did the UNI
gracious nephew spout it: 1t is also
known that Mrs. Hayes sports such a
haublc. Why was no mention made OF
that? Now comes the clinchcr. Under
the head 'all personal property not in
cluded in the enumerated items" appears
in 1874, $1,000; in 1875, $1,000: in 1876, q
total of $4,000. This covered mortgage
notes still on record, which should have
been given in full every subsequent year
aggregating over $1,000. Added to this
should be
GALLERY OF PAINTINGS
Valued at the lowest at $4,000, and lib
rary representing at least 1900 more.
Though these are inside figures, here IS Z
total of $4,000, 10 which at least 81 900
or $1,000 OF the household goods should
be added, and yet the total for 1874 is but
81 900 increased to SG,l20 or S5,7l0, re
spectlvely, in 1875 and 1876. The mort
gage notes
PRESENT A SQUARE ISSUE.
There is no lodging them. They repre-
sent a specific sum, every cent of which
according to law, should have been re
| turned tor taxation, and yet Rutherior'
| b. Hayes has affixed his signature undo
oath TO a statement entirely ignoring thi
item. More than likely some unctuOu
defenders OF the perjurer will maintain
| that man of
RUTHY's EASY WAYS
| Is not to be held accountable like othe
men. The $1,000 mortgage for a term o
three years may have been an oversight
they will argue. Would such an easy
going man be tit Tor the presidency il
these timeSg But, hold. He is not s.
careless, after all. He can be quit
minute, and particularly where it cost
little or nothing, and under the head G
sheep he has not failed to list an oil
family bachelor ram that has for year
browsed around the yard, and under
THE HEAD OF DOGS
he gives one in 1875 and three in 1876
The officials of the recorders office, neye
dreaming OF such a state of things, wer
: utterly dumbfounded on becomin
aware of this discovery, and acknowlcds
ed that it was as clear case of perjur
against Gov. Hayes as amy ever presente
| before a court