The New York herald., 1876-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS.
ALBANY. n. Y, Nov. 3.

ALBANY. n. Y, Nov. g. 1874
The following is list OF the mrs. hundred cases %
the calendar OF tho Court OF Appeals for November
ls76:-
Class NO. l. The People vs.. Christopher; No. .
Meyers va The People, No. 8, People vs Pratt Class
2 No. !, Laurence vs.. Lindsay; No. 5, Laurence vs.
Lindsay; No. Q. Laurence VS.. Lindsay; No. 4 sisters
Of Charity Of s.. v,nscn' dc Paul vs Kelly; no. $,
So II, Parsons VS. Johnson 30 H. Livingston y.
Murray; No l3 Hannah vs. Baunah No. ii, Melehcr
Fisk; No. Is, Baiy IS. Bergen; No. TO- Bochc Vs.
Dorschcr: No. IL, Wilson vs. Randcl: No is Dnchcts
spuycn uuyvii AMI Port Morris Railroad Company;
needy; No. 2i, Victory VS. Baker, No. -, Zm.
mcr VS. New York Central and Hudson River
Railroad Company. 10. zs stewart Bcal;
No - Bragnc VS.. Lord; No. %, Dayton IS. John.
son; No 20. Ireland vs. corsc; No q, Wing Cor
Tho New York Central and Hudson River Railroad
Company; No. 80, Commercial Bank OF kentucky Is
Varnam; No 81, sicgcr VS. Cullcr No. 81, Homer
33 Lawrence vs Iinsay; No a. Flynn vs. The Eqult.
able I.c Assurance Society No. 50, Morton VS. Pal.
kurancc Company; No 81, Van warl VS. Siettman; No.
IS, White vs. Hickman; No. 80. Hodnian VS. Finckc;
No 40 Duckcr va Ramp; No ~, Beck Carter; No.
A. Kalpfcisch vs. ka.uncsch; No. 43, Miller ss
Brenham; No. H. Matthews VS. Sheenan; No As, Baker
VS. Arnot: No. 40, Crane vs. Turner; No. II, Muir.
dock VS.. Ward; No 49, Ginna vs. The second Avenue
hallway Company; No. 40, smith VS. Kinney: no SO.
Smith Kidd No 81, Houch VS.. Crnighcad: No So
Shaft VS.. The Phrnix Mutual Ic Insurance Company,
Class 4.-No. IS, Tenth National Bank VS. The
Mayor; No. So Dorcmus The Mayor; No 81,
O'Gorman VS.. Tho Mayor No 5S, Tho People cx rel.
Miller The Board OF Police Commissioners OF New
York; No. 81, Macaulcy VS.. The Mayor; No 30.
Diche vs. The Mayor No. 81, Thc People OK rel
t:ies LuTcn County Judge; No. 81, Davenport VS.
The Mayor; No. 63, Billings vs. Tho Mayor;
No "a, Tho People rel Conway va The
Board OF Supervisors Of Livingston County: No.
65. The People New York Staten Island Ferry
Company; No. %, Thompson vs.. Tho Mayor; No 81.
Emo The Mayor; No. 6s logan VS.. The Mayor; No
90. Security Bank Of the Cny OF New York VS. Ma
,ona Bank oi the Republic; No. 20, Donald VS. The
Mayor; No. II, Smith vs. The Mayor; No ~ wehle
Conner; No. 73, Luce VS.. punnam No "a. In 70
petition Of Garner 10 vacate, &c No. IS Dc Wolf VS.
Williams, ShcriG; No "a, People VS. McCann: No n,
People OK rel. Banks Colgate; No. rs, People ex
rel. Heay Leask; No. 20, Banker Vi. The IIayor:
No. 50, Conway vs.. The Mayor; No 81, DoIan va
Tho Mayor No. 81. The People cx rel Dcmarcst VI
Fairchid, Attorney General; No. S3 Dolan vs. Tho
Mayor; No S. Yale VS. Dedcrcr; No. Sc. Stone Va
Browning; No. 81, Wood vs. Lafavetic; No Ss Filler
". New York Central aud Hudson River Railroad Com.
pany; No. 81. Gscno VS.. Black; No 30, Mowiy vs.
Sanborn; No, VI, Hassnm City OF Rochester; No
~, Van Wort vS Albany and Susquchanna Railroad
Company No ?3, strong vs. City OF Brookly n; No. ~,
Tram W. Holland Purchase Insurance Compiny; No.
05. Ford vs.. Belmont; No 90, Whitney Arms Com.
pany vs. Barlow; No o.. Sixth Avenue Railroad Com.
pauy VS. Kerr; No. 9s Arnos VS.. Pntston and E.mirs
Coal Company; No. ~, Brookcr Myers; No loo
Hoffman, vs. Union Ferry Company OF Brookyn.