The New York herald., 1876-02-22
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURT-CHAMBERs.
pa,or. 1nd,o I.awrenc.


Matter OF Canheld-I will grant this application
upon an order being submitted similar TO that entered
m the case of Kuster in the Court of Common Pleas
Sstare VS. Mechanics and Traders Bank.-If the
resolution directing the sale OF the stock was valid the
bank is liable in this action II Invalid only the ON
GERS from whom the plaintiff received instructions Is
liable II would therefore, seem that this motion to
make the trustees parties defendant should be de-
Bunker va Guardian National Life Insurance Com
pany-When the testimony Is handed in will settle
the proposed case and amendments
Gardiner The Mayor, &c-I again call the atten-
ton OF counsel the fact that papers have been
presented on the part OF the defendants
Mann vs.. Willoughby. as settled
Cowdin VS. Teale-Motion 10 stay proceedings pend
ing appeal denied
Seaver vs. The Mayor, 6c-Moton for rehearing
Of the moIon for leave to amend the answer is denied
but as | think that the defendants should be allowed
to review the order denying leave 10 amend, will
grant stay that order on payment OF costs OF mo-
ton and condition that the case be placed on the
March General Term calendar and short notice be taken
Matter Of Feld-I desire either to hear counsel orally
or to have them file briefs
Pierce vs. Thurston ct A.-Granted.
Matter of Feld-I shall not make the orders asked
for with my present understanding OF the facts Memo
randum.
rogatorias to be fled and reference TO take the
of the defendants and to take and report such
other evidence either party desire 10 produce in
respect to the alleged contempt
hesitation, to allow the amendment which IS asked Tor
these terms The defendant must pay all the costs
OF the action and of this motion, and the
must IL the plaintiff desire retain its place upon the
calendar and be tried when called
Poullvn, &c, VS. volkleing. ng.-Memorandum
Oceanic Steam Navigation Company vs. Walsh
Bond approved
Matter Of Bagoli-Motion to vacate assessment
granted, &c. Memorandum.
Matter of Benjamin-The amount of the bond does
not seem be sufficient The estate is worth 500 600
Bond proposed S. 600 The bond should be in double
value OF the real and personal estate of the unatc
e Crary Special Proceedings, p Isl II there are any
special why the amount OF the bond should be
reduced will hear counsel
CholweI VS. Nichols.-Reference ordered to
tain, &c. Parties will agree on reference. Memo
randum.
Brooklyn Life Insurance Company VS.. Pierce-Mo-
ton denied with costs. Memorandum.
Baylies W. Bayles-Report Of referee confirmed
and Judgment of divorce granted TO plaintiff
Jessurum VS. Kiluzle ct al.-Plaintin may discon-
tnue payment OF costs for proceedings before and
subsequent TO notice Of trial and costs OF motion.
Matter Of Topping; Matter Of Burke-Assessments
vacated and set aside Memorandum.
Wein VS. Sennier.-Thcre should be a under
taking Memorandum
Matter of Baylis-Motion TO vacate assessment
granted. Memorandum.
Radzuisky vs. Friedman.-Has this application been
made to another JusticeS
Livingston VS.. Grew.-Upon looking at the authori-
ties submitted by the plaintiff am of the opinion that
my first impression erroneous and that the answer
is frivolous As II seems to have been put in good
faith and the defendants counsel that she has
defence the defendants NAY have leave TO answer,
payment OF costs OF motion and costs before notice OF
trial. and upon stpuaing 10 answer in Ave days and TO
accept short notice OF trial
Roberts vs. RepinsKL-Motion denied no costs
Chamberlain VS. Eiott-Moton is denied, but, as the
practice has been unsettled without costs Aemoran-
dunn
Gowand VS. Lacey. Memorandum.
Richards VS. Richards. ds.--Memorandum.
BY Judge Brady.
st. Luke's Hospital VS. The Mayor, &c. Lyddy vs.
McVean Granted
Lyddy VS. Mcvean. Granted, unless the proceedings
have been stayed on appeal
crosby VS.. Day-Opinion-
BY Judge Donofiue
Prouty VS. Lake shore ana Michigan Southern Rail-
road Company.The order Is too broad aud should be
resettled Order suspended until resettled.
SUPREME CoURr-CIRCUIT-PART 3.
BY Judge Lawrence
Nash vs. The Mayor, &c--I think that the plaintiff
Is entitled TO Judgment Ordered accordingly The
findings may be settled at two days notice. Memo
randum
SUPERIOR CoURT-SPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Sedgwick
Prince Twenty third Street Railroad Company
Application denied.
Struthers Meyers; Cbattinton vs. kulford.-
Motions denied.
otto vs. Reynders settled.
Cheesman vs. Post-The matter involved Is not
granted Motion denied with $40 costs, to abide
National Trust Company va Rooerts-Motton
granted
chooses take a reference his ability pay this
sum.
schonck vs.. Ferguson Thea vs. Second Avenue
Railroad Company; 0fhnger VS. De Wolf; Jessup
Avenae Railroad Company; Hawkinson vs. Krenkel-
Orders granted
BY Judge Sanford
Stout ct al Reppenhager ct al-Judgment
dered for plaintiff with costs Opinion.
Adams sc, VS. Gray ct aL-Judgment for plaintiff