The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-01-27
from our Yesterdays Evening Edition'I
The Morning Press. i

Nh, r,se devotes IT'D editorial space to remarks
,,ron the fraudulent Issues OF bonds 70 u,oso
c.tlod Chattanooga Railroad Company ana pre-
so,,ts ~ its readers tho forthcoming repor on
tbnt subject OF the House committee ch"rgeo
with the investigation Of the proceedings Oh ,he
Funding Board. os
The Republican, in discussing the Cuban aues.
ton. iutimates It's approval oil poncy VI
American intervention for the reason .hat ,''e
war In Cuba n winged IN manner incohs,s" I,
with tho usages of civilized warfare: taV IL nus
involved tho murder Of American QUEENS ai'u
TINT its prosecution has interrupted or imposed
too onerous burdens upon. tho commerce u ''io
United States with that colony.
In another article IL declares that the hepub-
licnn marty of the nation having taken to ho"rt
tho losson of the a,tumnal elections oil 1874 nus
aimee then thoroughly disinfected and purliiea
itself, and II hopes that tho party IN TINS s'a''
will initiate so good an example anu present "
clean record at the next election.
Tho Times reviews the decision OF the Su-
prern0 Court in tho case OF MONTY w. Tue huui-
tor. confirming tho decision In the chse oil mo
New Orleans Republican w. tho Auditor. ana OK
presses the opinion that 1t opens inc door 10 .ho
enforced payment OF any and every approprla-
ton made by the Legislature. whether IL exceed
tho constitutional limit or not. 1t very properly
remarks that this decision makes IT the duty o.
our Legislators 10 be worry careful not To make
any appropriations beyond that limit
n also rdIcules the pretensions OF Attorney
General Field to be considered as q faithful
Guardian of the treasury of the State. and re-
ferring to the Attorney Generals statement thai
he had employed Messrs. Fellows and Cotton 70
assist him In the defense Of the State against O
large number Of appropriations, 1T malicionsly
pretends to have hoard 1t said that this eminent
trio Of jursprudents never won suit that ilao
two sides to 1t.
The Pic1vtne gives almost O column to u hu-
morous treatment Of u very grave matter
namely. tho offensive manner In which CAN
Sartain. Murroll and Dcmas consume tho valu.
able time Of the House with trivial motions ano
points OF order II intimatos that These parties
have taken upon themselves the burden Of in
structing tho House in It's own rules
II also troats Of the operations Of tho "bunko'
mon In this city, as developed during tho trial o
Superintendent Loan. and thinks that II Colone
Loan cannot suppress this nuisance. no SHOULD
| step down and out.
| The bulletin treats us to an essay on An I'm
portant Requisite OF Concurrent Legislation.
| and gives its views "a to tho proper rule OF pro
cedure In carrying u bill from tho first TO til
| Inst stage.
| In commenting upon tho recent trial OF super
| intendent Loan. 1t very properly holds the Su
perintendcnt responsible for the existence o
"bunko" houses In the city. on the principle
that It is the duty of a Commander-in-Cbieft t
see to the proper execution Of his orders
| II reviews ut length the House School bill In
| trodueed by Mr.. Walker. Of Orlenns.