National Republican., 1876-11-14
THE CoURTs.
Supreme Court of the United States.


MONDAY, Nov. 1s, 1s7e.
On motion of Mr.. W. d. Dayidge, 8. Edwin
Day, esq, of Moravia, N. Y, and Hugh W.
shefey, esq., of Staunton, Va, were admitted
to practice as attorneys and counselors OF this
court
On motion of Mr.. T, ]. Durant, James L.
Bradford, ESQ.,, Of New Orleans, La, was ad-
mitted te practice as an attorney and counselor
Of this court.
On motion of Mr.. George W. Biddle, Henry
Green, esq. of Easton, Pa, was admitted to
practice as an attorney and counselor Of this
court.
No. 50. James A. Lovejoy ct al, plaintiffs in
error,vs. Carroll G. Spofford ct al. In error to
to the Circuit Court Of the United States for
the District of Minnesota. Mr.. Justice Hunt
delivered the opinion of the court, reversing
! the Judgment Of the said Circuit Court with
costs, and remanding the cause, with direc-
tions to award q new trial.
No. 4S. Horace B. Clafiin, plaintiff in error,
vs.. Julius Houseman, assignee, &c. In error
to the Supreme Court Of the State OF New
York. Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the opin-
ion of the court, affirming the Judgment of the
said Supreme Court in this cause with costs.
No. 81. The United States, plaintiff in error,
Circuit Court of the United States for the Dis
i trict of Minnesota. Mr.. Justice Davis deliv-
cred the opinion of the court, reversing the
judgment of the said Circuit Court, and re-
manding the cause with directions to overrule
the demurrer and to proceed In accordance
with law and justice.
| No. IS. Michael o'Hars ct al, appellants,
VS.. Jno. G. MacConnell ct al, assignees. Ap-
peal from the Circuit Court of the United
States for the Western District of Pennsyl-
yania. Mr.. Justice Miller delivered the opin-
ion of the court, reversing the original decree
of the said Circuit Court, with costs, and re-
manding the cause for further proceedings In
aPnOrd NTH 10 nd
No. 43. Samuel J. Sherman, plaintiff in error,
VS.. ID. 8. ID. Buick. In error to the Supreme
Court Of the State of California. Mr.. Justice
Miller delivered the opinion Of the court, re-
yersing the judgment of the said Supreme
Court, with costs, and remanding the cause
with instructions to order a new trial, in con-
formity with the opinion of this court. Mr..
Justice Field took no part in the decision in
this case. ~
No. 297. Charles Kerrison, assignee, &c.,
appellant, VS.. A. T. Stewart 81 Co. Appeal
from the Circuit Court of the United States for
the District of South Carolina. Mr.. Chief JUS
tice Waite delivered the opinion of the court,
affirming the decree of the said Circuit Court
In this cause, with costs.
No. 933 of 1875. The Selma and Meridian
Railroad Company ct al, appellants, vs.. The
Louisiana National Bank, of New Orleans, ct
al. The motion to rescind the order docketing
and dismissipg this cause and for leave to
lips in supports Of same, and by Mr.. T. ]. Du--
rant in opposition thereto.
No. n OF 1875. Thos. A. Osborne ct al. plain
tiff in error, VS.. The Uuited States. The mo-
tion for an order directing the clerk to issue
mandate in this canse was argued by Mr.. E.
s. Rrown in support of same, and by Mr.. As
sistant Attorney General Smith in opposition
thereto.
No. 81. Chas. W. Hornor, plaintiff In error,
vs.. Geo. G.. Henning ct al. The argument of
tIis cause was commenced by Mr.. F. P. Cuppy,
Of counsel for plaintiff in error.
Adjourned until to- morrow at 10 O'Clock.
General Term-Judges wyIs, 0lin, Macarthur
and Humphreys on the Bench.
This court met yesterday, and withouttrans-
acting any business, adjourned until the 20th
instant. - g.-.-.-..g g-- --...r-.
Circuit Court-Chisf Justice Cartier.
Ranney VS.. Gregory. Default.
Byington VS.. Goldstein& Co. Leave to plead
extended TO Goth instant. ..-
johnson vs.. Pryor. On hearing.
Equity Court-Judgs wyis.
Page VS.. Richardson. Guardian adlitens ap-
pointed.
: Willett VS.. Lyles. Account of receiver filed.
johnson VS.. Chapman. Modification of de-
cree Of September %.
Nailor VS.. Nailor. Motion to pay to defend
MED. .-Hr
Washington Market Company VS.. Andrews
& Wade. Plea oyerruled and ten days allowed
to file answer.
Thorton vs.. Campbell. Sale decreed, and
A. L. Kent appointed trustee.
Keyser VS.. Haviland. Sale decreed, and W.
H.Cissel and J. T. Edwards appointed trustees.
Power vs.. Davis. On hearing
Criminal court-Judge Macarthur.
William Kahlert, defacing private property.
John Albert, selling liquor without Il
cense.
Franklin Guy, unlicensed bar.
Vincent Mason, carrying concealed weapons.
Margaret Kempt, unlawful bar.
Augustus Willige, unlicensed bar.
Mahlon Best, unlawful bar.
Henry Harrod, carrying concealed weapons.
John Hicks, carrying concealed weapons.
In all of the above cases judgment was en-
tered by default.
John Early, carrying concealed weapons;
sixty days in jail. -
Henry Stevens, disorderly; five days in jail.
John B. Kessler, unlawful bar; discon-
tinued.
The following appeal case was disposed of:
John F. Scrivener, keeping an unlicensed bar;