The New York herald., 1876-03-18
DECISIONS.
SUPREME COURT CHAMBERS.


wilkinson VS. Orvis.-Moton granted with stay
Mauder ct al vs.. Mauder ct aL-Motion granted.
There is nothing in tho papers rendering it unfair to
not claimed fixed by the order, but the order
refers il 10 ascertain what fair return to tho pur-
chaser for his expenses on being released from his
bid under this the purchaser seems to me to be entitled
10 what is reasonable charge by counsel on this mo-
tion-Report confirmed.
Matter of Stoller OF aL-Order granted.
Dinnn VS.. Ashey-Motion denied,
ulman VS. Haas. Motion denied.
By Judge Lawrence
Smith ct al vs. Pond.-0rder granted denying mo-
tion.
Elwood VS. KeaL-order granted denying motion for
attachment
Gardiner VS. the Mayor, &C. Ullsheimer vs. Hey
may-Orders granted.
Zecher VS. Ternan.-I should prefer to have counsel
submit brief in this case on or before Wednesday,
March o. But If oral argument Is desired will
hear counsel on Friday, March pa upon the adjourn
Richards vs. Rlchards.-It is very doubtful whether
the plaintiffs attorney IS entitled to anything beyond
his costs and tho allowance granted him by the Court
am, however disposed TO give him the benefit Of the
doubt and after examining the testimony am of the
opinion that the further OF $3.50 will be full and
ample compensation (for the services which he
dered) over and above the allowance made 10 him by
the decree herein.
Hoyt VS. Wade Counsel must hand in papers
Matter OF the application of the Department Of Docks
relative TO Piers SO and 34-In this understood
counsel to suggest that they desired to present further
briefs, and have delayed taking up the for that
reason Counsel Will present their briefs as soon as
possible.
grounds'-Frst as TO the denals in the answer, the
case Of Whyland VS. Tyser, as, n. Y, 2Sl, is con-
trolling and 45, N Y, p 465 second, as to the
alleged be irrelevant the motion is too late
(see rule 2S; third, Judgment cannot be granted on
the ground Of the frvolousness OF portions OF the
answer; the whole answer must be frivolous or the
motion cannot be granted tGrocers' Bank VS..
ORourke Howl No costs
Smith VS.. Wrght-Adherng to the opinion first
pressed shall refer the question Of fact raised by the
Afdavs to referee Hamilton Cole appointed referee.
Cutting &C. VS. Stevena-The order will be entered
cxVith Oead nj tha
posed order submitted by Mr. Levy will be incorpo-
rated in this order. l am not inclined to give stay
unless ample security is furnished.
Matter of Gibert.-Having made an order as to the
be allowed 10 the lunatic am indsposed TO
change it, except for the most sufficient reasons l
shall certainly refuse to act upon an ex parte petition.
Petitioners prayer is refused, with leave to renew
SUPREME couRT-spEcIAL TERM.
By Judge Larremore.
The People ex rel Schauck VS.. Green, &c. the Peo-
pie ex rel New York Dispensary VS. Greene &c.
Judgment Tor the respondents on the demurrers See
Boss VS. Ensworth-Case decided March 10, 1876
BY Judge Van Worst
Mora vs.. GulfoyIe. Findings signed.
SUPREME RT-cRoUIT-PART 3.
By Judge Lawrence.
Brennan VS. The Mayor &c.-Memorandum for coun-
ago did finally receive the papers until the Sd of
February just before commenced to hold the Cham
bers OF the court where my duties were so aborious
and unremttng as TO prevent me from examining this
case Upon taking II up do not and the notice OF mo-
tion in the papers. Counsel will please hand it in.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Curtis
Laws ct al VS. Gibson ct aL--Allowance OF four per
cent on amount OF recovery.
vandenburgh The New York City Central Under
ground Railway Company ct aL-Referees report OF
sale confirmed.
Campbell Conner.-Undertakn approved
Daily VS.. Brown.-inJuncton order granted.
The National Broadway Bank Philips ct al
Mouser ct al Ferguson; Bartlete Barry, &c
Bartlete VS.. Barry, &c Belmont vs. Pomert ct al.
Zann ct al Phlps-0rders granted.
Werling Va klim.-Ali order lett with Clerk Of
Special Term.
Whitney VS.. whitney.-Referee ordered to take
proofs
COMMON PIEAS-sPECIAL TERM.
By Judge Van Brunt
Devlln vs.. Gallagher; Lyncn VS.. Rnaldo.-cascs
settled.
By Judge Robinson.
Kohsatt ct al VS.. n.-Memorandum.
COMMON PLEAs-EQUTTY TERM.
By Judge Robinson
Cole vs. SILL &c-Complaint dismissed without costs
and without prejudice.
MARINE COURT-CHAMBERs
BY Judge McAdam
Beach Shelton; Aehers VS.. Reheleger. Opinions.
Gregory vs. Leonard.-Motion TO compel defendant
to file memorandum granted
LanUon Harvey.-Order settled
Sauder vs.. AppelL-Moton granted on terms.
Levinscott Gallagher. Motion granted on terms
Page vs.. Thompson Motion dismissed.
Cohen va Brooke; Strouse VS.. Observation-Disclosures
ordered
Hart VS. HunL-Moton granted
German Exchange Bank vs. Brown; Levy vs.. Dis
becker Tuthl VS.. Strong; Riand vs Totaus; Bis
chon VS.. Meashing; U'Rourke vs. Brennan; Walsh VS..
Sullivan; Rosenthal VS. Canary; Holmes Griggs'
Manu- ciurng Company vs.. Paoi Belt Manufacturing
Company.-Mouon TO advance causes granted
receiver.
Hauser vs. Naturalization denied.