The New York herald., 1876-12-27


Foley vs. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. OF the orders pre-
sented appears TO be exactly correct There should be
. separate order each order. In that respect the
orders presented by the attorney for Wetmore arc
and other papers read on the motion Mr. Henderson,
proposed order disposes OF the three motions as one
THIS does not seem TO be correct practice
In the matter OF Huntcr.-From the papers sub.
mitied infer that tho only parties who dispute the
right OF the children OF MRS Bu,terworth 10 the fund
mentioned IN the petition have withdrawn their oppo
stion (sec Mr.. Ogden's letter. II right on this
inference Is unnecessary 10 pass upon the point pre-
sented by the petition. ii my inference is incorrect
OF the Buterworth children TO the fund TO file brio
The usual order OF reference 10 pass the accounts OF
BY Judge Donohue
Matter OF Sural ral-Memorandum.
Donneliy va AcCahilI; Sanford vs White-hotions
Wilson VS.. American Tontinc Lilo and Sayings In
surancc Company.-hust be reference
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van Worst
o'connor vs. The Mayor, &c-Judgment for plain
Josephthal ct al. vs. Heyman ct al-Judgment for
plaintiff. Opinion.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van Hoesen
Ahern vs. Bryant-Order of arrest vacated on de-
fendant stipulatng not TO serve. See memorandum.
Scgharat VS.. WetzeL-Moion for receiver granted
Lcrchevs. McComb.-Defaut opened on defendant
paying SO costs of moon together with the dsburse-
Matter OF Beiloes.-Aotion denied SEQ memornn-
dun.
Fruninger VS.. Busch-Motion granted on defendant
stipulatng not to serve. Sec memorandum.
Strauss vs.. Newman Motion denied. SEQ memo
randum
Baldwin VS. yance-Order settled.
Mcintosh We. Burton.-See memorandum.
:, Ward vs. Gardner-Motion tor allowance denied
Notion to amend decree Denied, See memorandum
Henry vs. kelly.-See memorandum.
SUPERIOR couRT--sPEcIAL TERM.
Rv Ind Van Vorsf
Sloane ct al vs. vibbard-Aoton denied, with $40
Fry vs. SpoGord.-Undertaking approved
The Knckerbocker Lie Insurance Company vs.
Patterson, &c.-hoton granted.
LyDbcrg VS.. .Zemansky.-Reicrence ordered.
In the matter OF regulating and grading Of 1884
street, from Eighth avenue TO Mount Morris square
Reference ordered.
Evans vs.. Evans Motion granted Counsel feo OF
$50 and $l2 per week nimony allowed.
BY Judge Freedman.
Meenaghan VS.. Nichols Ell al-Motion granted, and
inquest aside TO both defendants payment OF
trial fee and plaintiffs disbursements and $40 costs
for opposing The motion, each defendant to pay ono
half
MARINE COURT CHAMBERS.
BY Judge Sinnott.
Wise vs. Schwab ab---Motion Tor trial will be
granted. See memoranda.
Hayman Elias Costs taxed per order entered.
Pilgrim VS.. Lcibert-Gcorge W. Gallinger, receiver
Rau vs. Boomcr.-Motion granted
Fuller va. Sternfels.-Motion for judgment granted,
&c
Easton vs.. Young.-Moton to vacate order Of De-
cember Is, 1876, denied. Sec memoranda.
Cam VS. Bourne.-Motion for attachment denied.
Giles VS.. Simon.--Memoranda for attorney.
Hanlon vs. Rossa.--Commitmentr refused.
Clarke vs.. Doying.- Notion viii be granted unless
terms OF order are complied with.
Babcock VS.. Case e-Order vacatng stay.
Gilman vs. Kane-Motion denied.
Landesman VS. Hoffman, Execution ordered.
O'Hara VS. Jones.-0rder refused
By Judge Sheridan
Smith Jones.-Order signed.
Str,ficr Hazard VS.. Sweol-Motion to strike out
answer, &c. granted.
MoArdle VS. Ryan.-Motion granted.
Striifier vs. Daberkow; Jones vs.. Curley; Same vs..
Wilson; Linders VS.. Layman; Worth VS.. Wcide.-0r.
ders granted.