The New York herald., 1876-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS.

ALBANY, n. Y, NOV IA, ls7G
In the Court OF Appeals to-day the following business
Motion Tor reargument Lake VS.. Eathans; Dunany
FERGUSON.
Appeals from ordcrs--No. 40o--The People ex rel
Van Tassel VS.. The Supervisors. &c-Argucd by G. T.
Collier for appellants. and X +. Andrews Tor respon'
dents t
No So The People rel Demorest vs. wickham- :
Argued by W. S. Wolf lor appellants, and Charles s.
Farchlld for respondents.
No 403 In re Prospect Park, &c, vs. Monnhan.-
Argued by r. G. Iiichinss ior appellants, snc John
II. Bergen Tor respondent.
oESERAL CALENDAR
No 10 Baldwin VS. Talimadge.--Passcd.
No IL Wilson VS.. Randall Submitted.
No 10. Bailey VS. Bergen. Argued by John II Ber-
No. &C. Ireland VS. Coarse.--Argucd by IRA D. War
rem for appellant and Charles +. Miller tor respondent
DECISIONS
Motion denied without costs-Rlsley vs. Brown
Judgment OF General Term reversed and Judgment
OF Special Term affirmed, with costs-Yonng VI. Hill
Order affirmed. with COSTS without prejudice TO the
company, to move the Court for leave TO abandon the
proceedings it may be advised-In 70 Rhine
beck, &c, R,ilroad Company vs. RadclT.
Judgment affirmed, with cosls-Read vs.. Decker;
Byrncs vs. Cohocs Morgan vs. Russell, &c, Manuiac-
turing Company; Wilson vs. Edwards; Kip vs. New
York and Harlem Railroad Company; Schuyler Va
Hayward; Cook VS. Wardcns OF ST. Pnul's Church !;
Bennett VS.. Lycoming Insurance Company; Mitchell
VS.. Vermont Copper Mtniug Company; Malcr w. Hi
hernia Insurance Company; Ph1nx Warchousing
Company vs. Badgcr; Barney VS.. Oyster Bay, &c,
Railroad Company; Baker W. Lever ..,s !
abide event--EdDgton VS. Mutual Lilo Insurance
Company; Rcdburn vs.. seneca Lake Grape Company !
Booth VS.. Boston aud Albany Railroad Company Cum
MINIS VS.. Agricultural INSURANCE Company; Julie vS
Hughes.
Judgment reversed and judgment for defendant on
demurrer, with cosls--Estcs vs.. Wilcox.
Appeal dismissed, win cosls-Ho mes vs.. Farmers
Joint Stock. Insurance Company Produce Bank VS..
horton Wheeler vs. Sconed
order affirmed, with costs-lp 70 Mary Elizabeth
Price.
Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party
against o.her-rennie vs. Continental Lie Insur-
ance Company.
Orders OF General Term reversed and entered
verdict affirmed, with costE-Sloman vs. Great West
Railroad Company.
Order oil General Term reversed and order Of Special
Term affirmed, with costs--Lyon VS.. LYON.
Judgment aiirmed--Thomas VS.. The People
Order affirmed and judgment absolute Tor defendant
stipulation, with coss-Bruce vs.. Burr
APPEALS CALENDAR.
The following is the day calendar for wednesday,
November Is, 1S76:-Nos IL, 2S, 60 49, 3d. 80 Al, ~
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
wAsuIyGroy, Nov. 13, 1876.
No. ST. Honor Hcnning ct al Error TO tho Su-
preme Court Of the District OF Columbia. This
action against the defendants trustees Of the Wash
ington City Savings Bank to make them personally
liable for the Of 1000, the allegation being that
the liabilities OF the bank exceeded tho amount OF its
capital STOCK aad that by the act OF 1870 amended,
the trustees become personally liable when such
state OF things existed The Court below sustained
demurrer TO tho BILL raising tho point that this per-
sona or individual liability did not apply TO tho IN
debtedncss OF savings bank to It's depos tors, and
averrns that II y did the bill did not aege that the
dobt claimed by the plaintiff was contracted IN excess
the amount OF capital stock, and also raising the
question whether the liability OF the trustees TO all
the creditors to each II rs here contencd that the
act speaks creditors generally and hence 1t applies
dcpositors well as others, and that II holds tho
shareholders liable 10 each creditor who may sue IL
is also urged that the bill Was sufficiently explicit +.
7. Cuny for plaintiff in error; W. D. Davidge for de-
PENDANTS.