National Republican., 1876-12-06
CONVICTs FOR THE pENITENTARY,
surkkNE COURT cJr THE UNITED STATES.

EuFEEAE COURT IF THE UNITED STATES.
TUESDAY, December s. 1915.
Bsry, PLAINTIFF IN error, VS.. Chester A. Arthur,
collector, sc. The argument Of this cause was
sSntiRTsd By Mr. s Clarke Of counsel fST the
General Smith, for defendant in error, and con-
sluded by Mr.. S. G. Clarke, for the plaintiffs in
No: 4s7, tassigned.l The Lake Superior and
The United States; No: e7s, tassigned;l The At
pany, appellant, VS.. the United States. The
argument Of these causes was commenced by Mr..
and continued by Mr. Thomas Il. Talbot. for rp' ap
psllants in No. 67s, and by Mr.. Solicitor General
Philips, for the appellee.
Adjourned until tomorrow a. L o'clock.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Before Chief Justice Cartier.
Matthew Pabst VS.. The Baltimore and Ohio
Railroad Company. An action brought to re-
cover t25,oOo damages claimed BY the plaintiff for
the loss Of his wife, who was killed by railroad
tram belonging to this company. Jury out.
EQUITY COURT.
Before Judge wyie.
LTPoINTNENT OF RECEIVERS FOR THE ESTATE
OF ". Il. LAHGLEY-BRISKHEss OF THE d.
VoRcE NARkET-AN INJUNCTION MADE PER-
FrrUAI.
Emily r. Killinon vs.. William II. Killinon
Suit for divorce. Reference to p. F. Larner, eN-
aminer, for proofs.
William b Slade ct al. VS.. ]. c. Slade ct al
Ratification Of the auditors report and trustees
directed to execute cOnveyances to The purchasers
Of the real estate.
Edward NJ. Bcteler, administrator, vs.. Charlie.
q. Langley ct al. Arthur Fendan and Charles
A. Elliott appointed receivers to receive the rents
and profits Of the real estate OF VIM. II. Langley,
the tesiRtOr in the bill, and the tenants of the
real estate to pay their rents in arrears 70 such
receivers.
q. F. Davis vs. James EdsOn ct al. Complain
ants motion for injunction denied, and restraining
order heretofore passed discharged.
O. Z. Bishop VS.. John E. Smith, administrator.
Complainant sues for payment Of claim against
the estate Of John l.. Smith. Rule on defendant
returnahle December l6 TO show cause why the
hahn should not be settled.
Hovey VS.. Mcdonald ct al. Motion to close
testimony denied. and defendcnt's motion for ex-
tension Oi time allowed.
Washington Market Company VS.. G. X. An
dTeWs ct al. Leave TO 1le a cross bill granted.
z Thompson vs. L. Thompson. Suit for divorce.
Reference 10 John CrUikshank TO take proof
Woodbury. Wheeler, trustee, VS.. Samuel Beall
ct al. Charles Wheatley, Samuel Z. Wheatley
and W. T. Wheatley were perpetually enjoined
and restrained from further proceedings with the
cause wherein the said Wheeler, trustee, &c, is
Sarnishee of said Samuel Beall; that the me
ehanic's lean placed by Beall upon the house and
lot Of plaintiff lie declared null and void, and the
Edwin Fitzgerald VS.. Susan Fitzgerald. The
defendant TO show cause why a receiver should
not be appointed to take charge of plaintiffs
property and pay therefrom the alimony granted
by The court
lord Bro vs. Thos Hamilton. On motion of
eonplainaut's counsel a decree pro cORfeSSo was
ordered, the respondent failing to answer or take
Aetion.
VIM. King ct al. vs. Jane Van Essen Dean.
Appearance of absent defendant ordered.
Henry W. Blunt VS.. Maria Hart ct al. Decree
TO amend bill granted.
T. S. and T. Company vs. VIM. Powell. Pro
eeEfeSs0 ordered, the defendant failing 10 an.
Randall vs.. Mexican Reference to auditor to
report names Of parties entitled as bsneteiaries
the next Of kin Of Robert Kerr SIS 600.
Edward wentworth vs. Mary A; Wentworth.
Appearance OF absent defendant ordered.
T. George Frietag VS.. Samestine. Decree Of d-
Albert Mcintosh vs. G. W MOultOn. TAppear-
ance of absent defendant ordered.
Christina Escher VS.. Clara Heck ct al. Com
plAinant granted leave to hle new bill, and sues
the county. decided TO Jacob Heck by plaintiffs
husband on terms that have not been complied
with.
william H Spooner VS.. H. N. Poulson ct al
Referred to the auditor TO state the account of
the trustee, and raifying trustees sale of certain
real estate.
WILLS PROVEN AND ADMITTED TO REcoaD-LEr
TKRs TEsTAXENTAEY lssUED-GUARDIAEs AP-
POINTED.
Probate Court. Before Judge Olln.
In re. estate OF Margaret Berry. Order to show
cause why co-exeeqtor should not be excluded.
In re. estate Of VIM: l.. Quirk. Howard A.
Last will and testament OF Deborah Hammond
iully proven.
Last win and testamen: Of Edward Jackson.
In re. estate OF Catherine Chrisholm. Letters
testamentary issued to Fitzhugh Coyle.
Last will and testament Of l.. l.. Schmidt. Or
der Of publication made.
Christian Fritz appointed guardian for his in
FAINT child.
Ia re. estate of Richard DonnelIy. Ratification
Of report and sale.
In re. estate of B. Frank Jacobs. The widow
appointed administrative.
Last will and testament Of c. p. Babcock. Or
der Of publication issued.
John q. Parker appointed guardian Of his in
FAINT child.
In re. estate Of Adolph kraeutler. Inventory
Of personal estate rendered.
In re- estate Of Elizabeth Thurbutt. Letters
testamtary granted TO Beatrice Duffy.
In re. estate Of Thos COOdendorter. Auditor
ordered 10 take testimony touching certain
vouchers.
In re. estate Of Thos. Dalton. Order of publ
eat ion made,
Last will and testament of Henry Bradley fled
In re. will Of Mary Morgan. Issues to be tried
BY Jury.
CRIMINAL COUET.