The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-19

Arkansas roads.
At ~ minutes OF the House nd
COURT NOTES.
united states Circuit Court.
Present, Hon. w. B. Woods, Judge.
George M. Bayley Il b. M. Pond,
charged with carrying on rectifying
establishment without the special in
ternal revenue tax. were arraigned and
plead not guilty. Messrs. William II.
Letchford and Albert Baldwin, in the
sum OF $1,000 each. were respectively
accepted as their securities.
In the arraignment of Messrs. Bayley
IL Pond they received the right, by or
der of court, to withdraw hereafter, II
desired, said plea (of not guilty. and on
ter either u motion to qllash or demurrer
on any other plea.
+. Il. Case. Receiver, VS.. John Reed ct
al.-On motion Of plaintiffs attorney 1t
was ordered that the defendants show
cause on the 26th inst. why the verdict
should not be set aside and q now trial
granted on the grounds on file.
N. w. Casey, Receiver, VS.. G. Mehle II
Co.-Judgment was for the plaintiff for
the sum of $3.50.
Il. d. Morgan Il Co. vs.. New Orleans,
Mobile and Texas Railroad Company
The verdict Of the jury and the judg-
ment of the court were In favor OF the
plaintiffs for the sum of 300, 900, with s
per cent interest on same from August
~, 1872.
This Is suit on promissory
note, given by defendant, through
John J. Howell, Secretary, in New
York, signed on March ~, 1872.
Superior Criminal Court.
Present, II IN. II. II. Steele, Judge.
Frank Paul and Mary Francis, con-
victed Of grand larceny, were sentenced
to the State Penitentiary for two years.
John Connors, on u charge OF perjury,
Officer Siers, on u charge OF assault ana
battery, were arraighed end plead not
guilty.
The case Of Alfred Capps was called
and the trial was progressing when this
report closed.
The Jury In the case of the State VS..
Alfred Capps a caiso that has occupied
the court three days were called into
court, and stated they could not possibly
agree. The States attorney objected to
their discharge on account OF the great
expense to the State, but was willing to
wait till II o'clock If tlaere was q posi-
bility Of the jury agreeing. The court
ing.
Present, Hon. Il. Akell, Judge.
Charles Curtis, on charge Of entering q
store in the night time, etc. Sam Will
son, James Dwyer and Henry Cooper,
on charge Of assault and battery, were
arraigned, and plead not guilty.
second district Court.
Present, Hon. A. l.. Tissot, Judge.
In the succession Of Philip Dumfn,
Richard Lloyd was concluded, and the
case taken under advisement.
Brunswick II Balke. VS.. G.. dc
FERRET. suit for n billiard table
was originally brought in the Fifth Dis
trict Court, and on the death of the de-
PENDANT, was transferred TO this court.
Testimony was taken and the case WAS
still on trial, with probability Of being
continued.
Fourth District Court.
Present. Hon. y. l.. Lynch, Judge.
Jose Domingo vs. Thomas Marley. The
new trial asked for was refused.
Thomassine Beaulien VI Joseph de
Fuentes. The rule taken by the plain
tiff for a new trial, of exception to juris-
diction, was submitted, and the new
trial refused
John A. Braselman vs. +. Troller. The
rule taken herein to exempt certain
effects seized, was made absolute, and
all the household furniture and cooking
utensils, and the following tools, etc. as
exempt from seizure, was ordered to be
returned to defendant.
p. Shoin vs. Mr. and Mrs. Heller, and
Hugo Redwitz. The rule taken herein
by defendants for new trial, was dis
1x,v f,tu rnf
John +. Burman VS.. j. u. ~ IL. M.
PAYNE a. Co.-On motion of Leovy a.
Monroe, of counsel for plaintiffs, and
on showing that plaintiffs claim has
been satisfied by Jacob Upshur Payne,
Jr., il was ordered that said Payne, Jr.,
be subrogated to all the rights of the
plaintiff In the above entitled suit.
Defaults were entered In the following
cases: II. i. Clafiin Il Co. vs. J. Turcotte;
The Same VS.. g. Z. Blanchard and Jo-
seph Turcotte.
II. B. Clafiin & Co., Henry Baer trans
feree. vs. Feiber Il Gonsenheim. judy
ment was rendered in favor Of the plain
tiff for the sum of $685. 50, with privilege
upon the property attached.
John q. Haas VS.. L. Marchand ct ais.
Judgment was for the plaintiff and
against the defendants in solido for the
sum Of $500.
Louis Lorain vs.. Eugene Deschamps.
Judgment was for the plaintiff in the
sum Of $155 Is.
Fifth District Court.
Present, Hon. T. North Cullom, Judge.
James G. Cooper VS.. Payne, Hunting
ton & Colt was ordered that there be
Judgment for the defendants.
J. d. Camors Il Co. vs.. G. H. Tied
man. The default Of the 18th Of Feb
ruary, 1876, was made final for the sum
Of $216 -.
Rhoda +. White VS.. Myra Clark
Gaines, City of New Orleans, etc,
motion OF Richard
DeGruy. attorney for plaintiff, it was
ordered that the garnishees show cause
on the , why Judgment should not
be rendered in favor Of the plaintiffs
and against said garnishees, for the
amount for which execution was issued
herein, say $18,512 rs. 1t was further
ordered that the traverse to the interro
cations herein be set down for trial on
The second day OF March, 1876.
sixth district Court.