The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1876-05-20
Court for Baltimore County.
MAY TERM, 1876.

MONDAY, May Is.
The May term of Court commenced this
morning OF the members of the Grand Jury
James Boyce, 9th district, was excused and
Samuel Sylvester drawn in his stead. Alfred
H. Slade, Sd district, and Christian Brandeau,
18th district, were also summoned on the Petit
Jury in the place OF others excused. The pre-
liminary call of the appearance, trial and
magistrates appeal dockets was gone through
with. On the irst-named the following entries
were made: Solomon King, trustee, VS.. VIM.
Bishop, Jr., dismissed John Cramer VS.. Nc
Pherson, Case & Co., attachment; condemna-
ton nisi VIM. Cleary VS.. G. H. Owings, set
tied John w. Boult VS.. j. Tolly Worthington,
attachment, satisfied John W. Stockdale vs.
condemnation nisi.
In the cases of the State of Maryland VS.. de-
linquent tax collectors and their bondsmen,
motions for judgments at this term were fled
The following cases were disposed of on the
trial docket; Samuel Kirby, executor of Sam
uel Ready, deceased, VS.. Jno. H. levin, adj
ministrator of John levin, deceased, and VIM.
II. levin, judgment by default against VIM.
IL. Levin for $260.20 with interest from date
and costs. The Chesapeake Bank vs. VIM.
Brooks judg ment for plaintiff by confession
for costs, to be taxed by the clerk. A. Robert
May VS.. Frederick Ballard; "off." Jesse Mar
6en VS.. Robinson & Co.; judgment for plain
tiff by default. Samuel Med. Sheppard VS..
John r. Ensor, Jas. Miller and Carlton Brown;
"eff.' John Il. McKim VS.. Geo. g., Catherine
and JAS A. Hooper stetted. Samuel NJ. Ran
kin vs.. Geo. Morrison and S. Parker Bosley +;
satisfied. Archenback and Miller VS.. John
Schultheis ; judgment for plaintiff by default
for $9S.04 with interest from date and 81. 6 cost
of protest. John G., and Catharine Colett vs..
John Grason judgment of non pros. under the
rule Helena Burke, by her next friend, John
! Il -
ment for plaintiff by default. Joseph Lloyd
Martin VS.. Jacob Hiss, "off." M. Duffy & Co.
VS.. VIM. j. Sadtler; Judgment for plaintiff by
default with leave. Young and Schreiner VS..
G. e. Goodwin judgment as above. Elizabeth
Lourman, VS.. Henry Engle judgment as bove.
Brown. Ellen & Co. VS.. j c. Sullivan & Co. ;
judgment for plaintiff by confession on terms
to be filed. Cathell & Morris VS.. same defen
dants same judgment. Theodore A. Lutt
gerding vs.. Jonah and C. V. Edelin, jud gment
as above. Thomas James VS.. Samuel j. Rob-
nson, garnishee OF Louis and Ellenora Mar
kell, attachment on judgment; condem nation
nisi Peter Light Wilson VS.. T. T. Griffith
judgment for plaintiff by default for S1S6.8O,
with interest from date and costs. Same VS.. j..
W. and L. L. Bull judgment fer plaintiff by
default for $105.70, with interest from date and
costs. Judgments fer plaintiffs by default, &C.,
were also entered in the following cases: The
United German Bank of Baltimore city VS.. Geo.
Leinhardt Ref; Edwin d. and Emma S.
Moores vs. Samuel L. Griffith W. S. Keech,
trustee VS.. Henry S. Barker Thss. Cox VS..
Elijah Halle; Jacob Raffensparger vs. Robt. S.
Hedrick; Edith Huston VS.. Hannah W. and
Aquila Cunningham Robt. Turner VS.. Jas.
Ross; John NJ. Rhodes & Co. VS.. VIM. Piper J;
J. H. Forney & Co. VS.. Henry w. Shealey !;
Peddicord & Brother VS.. jeremiah Wood; Jno.
S. Bullock & Son VS.. W. NJ. Isaac, administra-
tor of Thos P. Phillips, deceased, and Thomas
D. Chapman-iudgment as against Chapman !;
Keen & Hagerty vs.. A. S. Carmin.
TUESDAY, May 18th.
The Magistrates appeal docket was taken up
and the following cases disposed Of F. G. F.
Waltemeyer VS.. the Baltimore and Ohio Rail
road Company; Judgment for appellant for
S65, and entered to the use of John T. Ensor;
John H. Zsuck VS.. J. NJ. Wilhelm, use of Ruth
s. Wilhelm judgment reversed, William
H. Richardson and wife VS.. Dennis & Brother;
reversed and judgment against W. H, Richard
son By confession for $25. Thomas johnson
vs. J ohm Eschback; dismissed Michael Nc
Gee and Bridget McGee VS.. Ben amin F. Car
man; reversed. William G. Payne vs. Ellen
Getz; reversed. Charles Jolliffe and Amos
Joliffe VS.. James Dolan motion to quash and
reasons filed. Peter New & Co. VS.. Charles D.
HYDE; dismissed. Josiah Gill VS.. John O.
Price; continued at expense of appellee. Keen
Haggerty VS.. Michael McGee; Judgment for
plaintiffs pY confession Tor SllI.oo. M. DuUy
4 Co. VS.. VIM. J. Sadtler; extended for SAL 49,
John Z. Zeger VS.. Eli G. Ulery'; judgment by
confession for $l742S.
WEDNESDAY, May IL.
Magistrates Appeals continued Nicholas
Mack vs. Henry j. Hoffman; judgment affirm
ed Simon Halle vs.. Martin Kennedy judy
ment below for Halle for $S5.43, with interest
and costs judgment affirmed. John T. Ensor,
garnishee of Mrs'Mary M. Treadway, vs. Mrs.
Jane Crow, by her next friend John Crow
Judgment below of condemnation for $22.17,
with interest, ETC., judgment reversed. o. E.
Reilly VS.. Isaac Crowther ST., judgment below
for Crowther for $500, with interest and $3.50
costs Judgment affirmed James Gammill VS..
VIM. A. Scott; Judgment below for Scott for
S32 96, with interest and costs judgment re-
versed. John Krastel VS.. E. Waugh Crowl and
E. Webster Crowl, trading as Crow & Co.
Judgment below for Crowl & Co. for $62 80, with
interest and $3.50 costs; judgment affirmed
Blizzard VS.. George P. Gettier and W.
Burns affidavit of non residence filed and
continued at cost of appellee VIM. J. Porter
VS.. Thomas Bachman; judgment below for
Bachman for property replevied one cent dam
ages, $3.50 costs; affidavit of Bachman filed |
and continued at expense of appellee. Chas.
and Amos Joiffe vs. James Dobbin judgment
below for Dobbn that he have execution for
the debt, etc, and $2.05 costs motion to quash
over ruled, and judgment affirmed. David
Keller John Thomas; judgment below for
Thomas for 81, with interest and 1855 costs |
anpeal dismissed