davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1876-03-28
mo DRY-GOODsMEN. GROOER

THO DRY-GOODSMEN, GROCERY
Il MEN, BUTCHERS &C.-We ofrer the larg
set line OF wrapping Papers, Paper Bags, Flour
Best quality manila, best quality bogus man.
lila. Best quality straw paper, all sizes and
sacks warranted full size and full weights. No
scrimping. We handle these goods In large
quantities, and our prices are as low as Others
selling same quality OF goods. Send us an
order.
GLOBE PAPER co
The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1876-03-28

Agents for tho Globe
II. p. Morgan, wallngford
Herbert Smith, Factory Points
II. s. Hard, Arlington.
c. &C. Pierce. East Clarendon.
co. Dyer. G. c. Slason, Brandon
Denn'son Brothers, Pittsfordj
Ruff Holt Pittsfeld.
K. w. hyde, Hydeville.
i. X. Horton, Clarendon.
D. p. Peabody, Pittsford.
VIM. 3. Alden, Middlebury.
Ii. u. Spencer. Sutherland Falls.
d. b. Cotton, Fairhaven.
Rice q Co., Castleton.
G. j. Gilmore, West Rutland.
D. Leffingwell. Middletown.
James Rice, Pawlet.
2. L. Parmenter, Mechanlcsvilie;
d. Horton, Mount Holly.
w. w. Hubbard, Poultney...,,
P. Holton, Dandy Corners.
William Pierce, Dandy;
B. A. Carter, Benson.
X. w. Goodrich, Wells.
P. ii. Robbins, Chester.
A. s. Mahon, East Wallingfordl
Sherman Brothers. Ludlow.
J. d. Purdy, ManchestorL
s M Southland, Vergennes.
]. =. johnson. Hubbarton.
Reuben Whitcomb, Stockbridge,
". +; Morse, ?. M, Shrewsbury.
g. Sails, Forestdale,
II. II. button, p. NJ, Cavendish.
J. G. Spencer, Postmaster, East Claren don
q. A. Ram, East POultney,
NJ. A. Pond, p. NJ, Whiting, VT,
Hiram Shattuck Bristol Wiz
G. r. Meacham. Springfield.
c. @. Nichols p. M, Shoreham
9. " Ross, z; M; Pittsiord Quarry.
E.C. W Moninson. 2. M: Perkinsville.
q. Brown, Chittenden.
A. A. SMITH. Weston.
The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1876-03-28

This medicine is prepared by a careful exper-
fenced and conscientious physician, In obedl-
ence to the desire OF numberless friends In the
profession, In the trade and among the people,
Every bottle Is warranted TO contain the full
strength Of the medicine in It's highest state OF
purity and development, and is superior TO any
complaint.
In simple cases sometimes one or two doses
suffice. In the most chronic cases IL is sure to
give way by the use OF four or i've bottles. BY
this eflicient and simple remedy, hundreds OF
dollars are saved by those who can least afford
to throw It away, as surely 1t is, by tho pur-
chase OF useless prescriptions.
The DIAMOND hIlEUMATIC CUR Il
is for sale at all druggists throughout the
United States and Canada. II It happens that
your druggist has not got II In stock, ask him
10 send for II TO any OF the wholesale druggists
In Boston, Worcester, Portland, Bangor and
other places. 1ei0deod&wly.
The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1876-03-28
A CCOUNT BOOKS
BLANK BOOKS MADE TO ORDER,

BLANK BOOKS MADE TO ORDER,
To any special pattern, with and without print
ed headings. A large stockof books ON hand,
inthe styles most commonly used, such IS
LKDGEhS. JOURNALS.
DAY BOOKS,
SALES,
INVOICES,
:. AZ examination Of our stock and prices
GLOBE PAPER co.
The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1876-03-28
PICTURE FRAMING,

CABINET WORK, COUNTERS, SHOW CASES,
WINDOW CoRNICEs,
Sash, Doors and Blinds and everything OF that
description, made 10 order on short notice, at
r. CANDLISH'S,
No. 80 Center street, opposite Berwick House,
Rutland, vt.
dtaprlS.
The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1876-03-28
+ Concluded from First Page. !

centennial as an illustration of the pictorial
genius of their sex. The world will then
be enabled to form some idea of the attain.
ments of the lady artists in New York.
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
A NICE LAW QUESTION.

In the Supreme Court, before Justice Donohue, the
ofBenjamin Haskn against the City brought
TO trial yesterday afternoon. Tho action for
services Assistant Clerk Of the Tenth District Court
OF which Judge John Flanagan is the Justice. The
City denied his appointment and the rendition of tho
services but after the examination of the Clerk of the
Court the of action admitted, and Assistant
Corporation Counsel Stetson sought defeat recovery
by claiming that moneys had been paid to Mr.. Haskin
for services as senographer and that he ncompe
TO render such services and had not in fact
dcred them and, therefore, the amount paid to him
should be offset against the present action Mr. Meyer
Butzel the attorney for Haskin, in his opening the
jury contested the proposition. When proof was Of
fered by the Corporation Counsel defendants counsel
Mr.. Abel Crook, introduced in evidence Judgment
stenographer and insisted that IL formed complete bar
and estopne Upon the city, After hearing argument by
both sides the Court reserved decision II the deci
sion shall be favorable to plaintiff important prece-
dent Will be established, which will materially reduce
litigation between the city and those in It's employ.
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
ALABAMA CLAIMS.

WASHINGTON, Feb. o. 1870
In the Court Of Commissioners Of Alabama Claims
to-day, in No. 72l judgment rendered in favor
OF Parkers Express Company for $3.50 25 and in
No 907, Robert Sche and Edward Sche for 81 o32 64
on motion of F. W. Hackett David Fowler. Of Balti-
more, was admitted to practice
The following presented TO the Court and
submitted on tho testimony and oral argument Of coun
SELL
No. 1908 George f. Brown, Master of the Henrietta,
The United States.
No. 1911, James i. Brown vs. The United States.
No. 1914 Edward NJ Hensley VS.. The United States.
No. 1902 Mary j. Brown, administrative, vs. The
United States.
United States.
David Fowler for complanants, and +, W. Hackett
for the United States
The following cases. by agreement Of counsel were
submitted upon the testimony :-Joseph B. Worth VS..
the United States, John J. Miguel the United
States; I. W. Haclett for the United States
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
THE GAS MONOPOLY.

To THE EDIroR or HERALD:--
Noticing that you arc strongly in favor OF breaking
up monopoles and agitating the gas question 50
well for the consumers feel il our duty 10 give you
this little news We compiled the following petition,
which wo took to every Third avenue.
who signed II without hesitation. II was signed By
800 Of the heaviest the lower part Of their
district:-
To THE HARLEM GAS LfGHT CoMPAvY:-
GESTLEMgS-We, the undersigned, consumers Of gaa
from your company would respectfully represent
owing 20 the depression OF business We are compelled
TO econOmze In every possible manner; that We can
not afford to pay the present prices for gas light and
that, unless gas be furnished us al lower
figures shall be compelled resort other material
for our light many have already dono Not wishing
10 d0ths If avoid H. and believing that gas can
be furnished at much lower figure and still leave
remuncralivc profit 70 the manufacturer, we would
respectfully ask that the price OF gas be reduced.
Alter getting these names 10 tho petition Mr Stanfal
went with II TO the Harlem Gas Light Company
saw the president and showed the pettouto him. Ho
would not recognize H. and emphatcaly refused to read
y, and said thst y dozen companies should
Harlem they would burst up; he said that they had
opposition and people must burn thoir gas and pay
them their price (which Is 50 per 900 feet. He said
that they did not II there was $50 or 500 nMnes
70 the petition they would lower tho price OF gas
hr stantal told him that he might send for his
Immediately as he would put forcible petit
uon 'tn the shape OF Oil which have done.
and can say without reservation that have better
light than we had with gas. We know that have
inlrngcd on your valuable space too much already
We would give you further particulars regarding The
Harlem Gas Light Company Yours respectfully
WARlNG 4 STANTlAI,
Garner Seventy-ninth Street and Third Aycnaa
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
RUBENSTEIN.

Pesach N Rubensteln still protests his innocence.
Yesterday he was visited by his sister who remained
in conversation with him for two hours. Three keep
ers have been assigned to the duty Of guarding him.
citizen told Of the jaers yesterday that he recog
nized Rubensten us man he had seen on the Grand
street terryboat on the Sunday the murder
mitted. He was then in company with young woman
who wore no bonnet 1t is believed that when the
condemned man finds that there is no longer any
hope of reprieve he will confess his guilt His
sci are engaged in preparing the papers upon which 10
base an argument Tor trial
District Attorney Winchester Britton denies that he
demanded the conviction OF Rubensten the ground
that he was jew as Is declared by Israel Rubensten
In his appeal to tho Hebrews. He says:-'I made no
attack on the Jewish people as a class a Sect
did ask for any conviction of the defendant in any
sense because he was Jew. What did say, which is
evidently what Israel Rubenstcin refers to, and the
only thing bearing any similarity TO his statement was
unless this defendant is convicted this testimony
II Will be long time before shall be able TO obtain
conviction on crcumstantial evidence IN this county,
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
REAL ESTATE SAFES.

But very few attended the sales al the Exchange
yesterday
Richard " Harnett sold by order Of the Court, the
house and lot, 2ox1o0, East Nnety-third street,
south SIDE $50 feet east ofThrd avenue for $500 over
mortgage Of Is, 500 to George r. II. A. Reimor also
ten lots 1llth street. south snio 70 feet east of
Eleventh avenue lots 25xlO0 IL each, to j. L. Kin
for SIS 600; also tho house and lot l6 sxlO2 q on
East Seventy nth street. south side 200 feet west Of
avenue A, Tor $780, to A. q. FransioL
V. X Stevenson, Jr sold the house and lot, 20 6xG0
No 222 Wooster street, east side, l4l feet south or
Amity street. TO Edward Raynor Tor IS, 900
II. W. Coats sold, by order Of the Court The plot OF
land 102xl021 on Boulevard, corner OF Eighticth
street to Annie g Flynn for 5000 mortgage OF
$50, 900 and interest
+. II. Ludlow Co. sold, per order Of the Court tho
lot 25xlO0 East Scvcntieth street. 100 icot from
Fourth avenue, north sde to II Stameyer for
So $50; also, one lot adjoining fronting on Fourth
avenue 100 feet north Of Scvencth street lot 25xlOO
TO u. Oppenheimer for 50 35O
William Kennedy sold, by order Of the Court tho
lease certain lots sevcnteenl known as the "Pikos
Opera House, property located on Eighth avenue and
West Twenty third street, 10 Hugh j. Jewclt for
0000 also the lot and building No 133 Essex street.
80 feet from Rvingon street for e. 50O over a mort
gage OF S. 500 TO ~ W. shelly; also the building and
lot adjoining No. 135 Essex street, sold 10 n W..
Shelly for 5000 over a mortgage OF $4,000.
A. IT. Muller & Co sold the building and lot 25x
81 ex25 9x255 No 127 West Thirty second street 20 d.
Van senuo for &c. 500 also the nno three story build.
ing and lots on Ninth avenue, southeast corner Of
Forty fourth street for t02.00o
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT--CH CHAMBERS.
BY Judge Lawrence.


Matter OF Walker-Tho contempt seems to me to be
plainly charged, and, under the provisions of the
statute, must remand the prisoner.
Gilbert VS. Seitz -Afidavit OF regularity required.
Campbell Spratt; Uhl vs. Falk (Nos and q
Harris VS.. Kennedy ct al Brown VS.. Van wyck; HoG
VS.. Sullivan; Powers vs. Matthew's Stckncy vs. Good
win; Scrymser Murray; Mutual Life Insurance Com
pany vs. Third Avenue Savings Bank ct al Townshend
VS.. Townshend CT al Nisscher Greenbank Alkali
Company; Strong vs. Cosine Weiihemer vs. Strauss;
Baird Smith; Sixpenny Savings Bank VS.. Murray;
Herbert VS.. Smith; Cornwell Brown stone Quarry
Levy May Decker and another; Matter OF Ridgway;
National Shoe and Leather Bank VS.. griffin; Hoff vs.
Sullivan Matter of Rutherford; Ferris VS. Phillips;
Levy VS. Strauss; Wilson Sewing Machine Company VS.
Woodruff; Kaiser Barels Haskin The Mayor &c
Mutual Life Insurance Company vs. Stewart; sy-
mngton vs. Palmer; Dunham VS.. Dunham ZtZmann
vs Meader; OGara VS. Curney May Strauss; May
Strauss; Schandn VS.. Watts; Rhnelander VS.. Hig-
enbotham; Stilfe VS. Strauss; Muller VS.. Strauss;
Wcstbrook VS. Duncombe ct al; Emo VS.. BurchelI Nos
/, q and 81; Manhattan Life Insurance Company VS..
Kuhn ct al Ottendorier VS.. Weber ct al Nos l. 3 g.
and 8; Wood VS.. Schole ct al; Reynolds vs.. Schoe;
MahaE Jones.-Grantcd.
Ehringer ct al VS.. shappert; Grant VS. Jones; May
Pavement Company; Cromwell Brown Stone Quarry
Company vs. Duffy and another; Horton vs. Chase
Orders granted.
POillon vs.. vokenDg; Mau VS.. smith-orders
granted denying motions
Milbank VS.. Millbank-Anowance OF $500 granted
Matter Of suellback-writ granted
Shrady VS. Loader.-The blanks in the order must
be filled up.
Muller vs. Muller-Referred to Judge Donohue
Freedman Bel.-Where Is tho report Of sale
which is sought to be confirmed?
Fellows VS. Schiller OF aL-The afldavit required
by rule 61 seems to be necessary.
Townshend VS.. Dixon.-Afidavit OF regularity
wanted
Matter Of Avenue St. Ncholas.-This order should
specify the amount TO DO paid
Renter Spclman.-I think that the referees re-
port should be presented and confirmed before dis
tribution Is made.
BY Judge Donohuc
Munster vs. Seward-I desire to see counsel
New York Savings Bank VS.. Dixon OF al Boyd vs.
Gillian; Buces VS.. Koch; Maurice vs. Maurice; Hoyt
OF al VS.. Hoyt ct al; Adrancc Wadsworth; Healy
vs. Healy. Orders granted.
Matter OF fZwnk.-Guardians bond approved.
Goldston vs. The Mayor, &c.--Granted.
Sloat vs. Roberts.-Not sufficient
SUPREME CoURr-CIRCUrT-PART 2.
By Judge Van Worst
Dunphy vs. The Mayor, &c.-Case and amendments
settled.
SUPREME COURT-sPECIAL TERM
By Judge Van Worst
Marsh VS.. Plyor ct aL-Judgment for paintin on de-
murrer TO answer.
BY Judge Donohue
Norman and another VS. Degraw OF al-See opinion
COMMON PLEAs--sPKCIAL TERM.
BY Judge Robinson.
Green vs. Grcen.-Divorcc granted to plaintiff
The New York herald., 1876-02-25

Hartman claiming 81, 600 damages on account Of the
leaks in the roof Of his house in Grand street. caused
as he alleges by the defendant his next door neigh
bor tearing up portion d while altering the upper
story Of his house. The case is being tried before
Judge Donohue, in the Supreme Court
In the suit brought by Henri Hennequn Co., OF
Paris against Henry Clews and Others the particulars
of which have been published in the HERALD, now in
progress before Judge sedgwick of the Superior
Court, Mr. Clews was yesterday examined at consider
able length The only feature of interest developed
was Mr. Clews want Of reteniye recollection OF the
facts Of the case
Mclean, Mars 4 Co., of Liverpool England, have
brought suit againsJosiah b. Blossom of this city, TO
recover "a 600 alleged balance OF account growing out
Of cotton transactions made by the plaintiffs as
commission merchants for the defendant The defence
is in the account The trial OF the began
yesterday before Judge Curtis Of the Superior Court
There was lengthy argument yesterday before Judge
Sedgwick, in Superior Court Special Term, mo-
ton for final judgment in the osSponord Brothers
against the Braginia Land Company of Texas. The
point is whether majority OF stockholders can by vote
ratiy act OF the trustees in purchasing for them
selves certain property spite OF the opposition OF the
minority, IL being conceded that such purchase would
otherwise be illegal. The Court took the papers.
In Supreme Court Chambers, yesterday before Judge
Lawrence Mr. John b. Perry moved a confirmation
OF the referees report tho divorce suit OF jennie
Carroll an actress at present engaged at McVcker's
Theatre, in Chicago, and John W. Carroll an actor,
playing at Wallack's The referee reports IN favor OF
annullng the marriage, the ground that IL was void
alb intio Mr. A. Oakley Hall represented the husband.
Judge Lawrence said that he would require addltoM
papers before he could pass upon the motion.
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
THE SEVENTH REGIMENT ARMoRY.

Tho general committee the new armory have is
sued circular asking for subscription to the new
buildings Among other things stated in tho circular
the following reason is given why the Seventh needs
new armory:-
As the centre OF population has advanced toward the
upper part Of the island during the past fifteen years
thr seventh regiment armory at rompkns Market has
become less and less central and convenient access
large majority OF its officers and members re-
side above Thirty street. and they find II difficult
and onerous TO attend the frequent drills which
necessary TO maintain the military efficiency OF tho
regiment Tho present armory by constant and
account OF the large drllroon being tho third
floor, has become unsafe IN the opinion OF architccts
the drill of than two companies one tlme
and the regiment can never the desired pcrcc-
ton until It's large drllroom is located the ground
floor. thereby giving an opportunity to practise mill
tary evOlutions IN double time, aud IS sufficiently spa
cious to accommodate one half OF the regiment at
battalion drill Tho future welfare and prosperity OF
the regiment as a large, thoroughly drilled AMI well
disciplined organization IS endangered, and new ar
mory in proper location has become positive neces
sity
The circular continues
A long and earnest effort has been made to secure
the erection Of new armory by the city state but
II become apparent that there Is a strong impress
sion among taxpayers and citizens generally thai tho
time Is inoppOrtune Tor the expenditure OF public
money for such purpose and that account OF the
large debt OF the city and heavy taxation there is
sonabe objection to any increase Of hepCblc burdens
The Board OF Officers therefore tue 18th OF ofJanunry
1876, resolved unanimously 10 make effort TO build
the necessary new armoy by subscription, and TO APP
peal to the active and exempt members OF the reg-
ment and to the wealthy citizens ahd business men o
the city for the amount required Tho officers and
mbcrs OF the Seventh regiment have subscribed over
$4,000 for the erection ora new armory; subscription
lists are now being circulated among the exempt and
veteran members, and II the wealthy citizens and bust
of the city contribute literally 20 this object
the complete success of tho enterprise will DO
sured. The Trustees OF the seventh Regiment New
ArmOry Fund Washington X. Nermilyc, Royal
Phelps and Robert LenOx Kennedy and all moneys COZ
octed be deposited la the United states Trust
Company, Union Trust Company, Farmers Loan and
Trust Company and New York Lie and Trust Com
pany. Drafts upon the fund are to be made by tho
Joint checks Of the OF the regiment and the
Veteran ASSOCIATION, and only In payment OF bills duly
approved by a majority Of tho Building Committee
Checks for amounts subscribed TO be made payable to
the Seventh Regiment New ArmOry Fund.- or to either
OF tho trustees above named
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
THE IRWIN CASE.

Richard B. Irwin, who arrested on Teusday
night at the suit Of Mr Rufus Hatch, late Director OF
the Pacific Mail steamship Company, upon charge OF
embezzng funds of that company was to have been
examined yesterday afternoon in the Office Of Judge
Bxby, No % Park Row. Counsel for the prosecution
appeared in the persons Of Messrs vanderpoo Green
and Cummings, and the defence represented by
ex-Judge William A. Fullerton and Mr. L. b. Chapman.
The hour set down for examination -four o'clock
was thought by Judge Bxby to be too late
in the day, and after discussion II
agreed TO postpone the proceedings until tomorrow
Saturday, at ten O'Clock A. NJ when the examination
OF Irwin viii be had in the company's Offices at Pier Al,
North River
Mr. Hatch was understood to say that Irwin stated
before Congressional Committee that he (lrwn had
employed over $780, 900 OF the companys funds osten
sioly TO bribe Congressman, but that Congress was
aware that the funds in question not employed In
the shape OF brbes alleged by the accused and that
on the contrary they were appropriated by Irwin for
his own use and benefit This Is the charge brought
against the defendant, and Mr. Hatch adds that tue
company which he represents 'wlll now try and get
back million of the more than $5, 900, 900 loss
which Irwin has caused IT.
The New York herald., 1876-02-25
ALLEGED sUBORNATIoNS OF PER
JURY

A rather singular suit was commenced yesterday in
the Court OF Oyer and Termner before Judge Barrett
Austin Black indicted for subornatlon Of perjury was
placed trial. He is represented by Ex-Judge Fuller
ron and Charles W. Brooke, and the prosecution by
District Attorney Phelps The facts of tho case as
stated in Mr. Phelps opening show that in 1866 man
named John Ross was engaged in business in this city
ms broker and that shortly afterward he disap
pcarcd; that aAer Mr. Black turned up possessor
OF check $63 OOO purportng to be drawn by
Mr. Ross the Continental Bank OF this city and that
when tho check presented at the Continental
Bank they declared that the certificate was
forgery whereupon Mr.. Black COM
menced suits against the bank claiming that
the ccrlihcation proper The issue raised in that
suit whether the certacation was forged or not,
and it became necessary for Mr. Black 10 establish that
the relations between Ross and Tmpson the teller OF
The bank very intimate, so as to make proba
bic that Mr. Timpson had really certified the check
II he could show this intimacy he might make the GER
tncaion probable Mr.. Black, knowing this, under
took TO supply evidence He engages Dusenbury,
former orrand bow OF Ross who In turn engages two
men, named Howells and Boelngcr, but there was
difficulty In the way Neither of these men knew Ross
who had absconded This difficulty, however, was
overcome by Black furnishing them with written
description Of Ross Howels and Boclinger had never
bury was directed TO take howeIls aud Boeln.
ger down to the Continental Bank day
would be very easy for them to see Timpson at
work at his desk in the bank. Dusenbury complied
WIN ie4ucet anu ulu actually take them down 10
the bank. Black then went 20 work 10 prepare very
elaborate examination in writing, which Howells and
Boclnger we're to learn by heart Evcrything went
on swimmngly Tor some time, but by some hocus
pocus or other The whole scheme exposed and the
two men tDusenbury and Black) arrested for sub
ornation OF perjury.
The prosecution called as their FIRST witness John H.
Duscnbury the young man who was jointly indicted
with the defendant Black Dusenbury testified that he
was employed IN the Office OF Mr. Ross for about ten
days; that he knew Black by sight, that he came TO
him about three years ago and asked him II he had
ever seen Mr.. Ross and Mr. Timpson together much
or at any time; witness told him that he had not he
then asked him II he could find any man who had seen
them together hc said ne thought he could find men
who could testify 10 what no wanted; no then went
vor 20 see Howcls and BoclinRer and told them that
there was job TO be had; witness knew they had no
money and told them that they could make $500 IN
they would testify Mr.. Black wished-ans6 when
lhey went into the court room and 225o after thar lof
The New York herald., 1876-02-25

On mosioa T. y. Durant William. II. Scott o.
New York city, admitted practice attorney
and counsellor of this Court
Case No 933 The Selma and Meridian Railroad Com
pany et al, appellants Louisiana National Bank OF
new orleans ct aLAppeal from the Circuit Court the
Ihlted states Tor the Southern district Of Alabama
on motion OF Mr. William H. Scott il was docketed and
dismissed with costs
Case No lo2-John W. Morsell ct al appellants, vs.
The First National Bank Of Washington.-The arru-
OF counsel for the appellants
Case No. l64-Elor Farnsworth ct al appellants vs.
The Minnesota and Pacific Railroad Company ct al -
The argument of this commenced bv Mr.
Henry f. Masterson OF counsel for the appellants and
continued by Mr.. IL. r. Bgelow and Mr. W. H. scott
for the appellees.
Adjourned until tomorrow at twelve O'Clock