The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1876-02-12
4 SOUND OPINION.
The Orvis Libel Suit-No BiIi Of Particulars
Rtuuired nv Law Tie SUMS Position -us-
tutncd- 4 Difference between JUDGES.

REQUIRED nv Law TIE suns Position Sus-
tuiucd A Difference between judges.
The following opinion was nlcd in the
Court Of mnon Pleas Yesterday.
Chtti,, H. Oiris oft. Cpulcs 4. Dtnd Cham
bcrs. tciiuar., 1s.G. The COMPLIANT of the
O. iutn in ans action alleges that u. defendant
Is the editor M pit ii.hcr " certain news
uai published IN the cttv ~ New yoke ~ Il
inE y. and That an the 2hn Of N'yc uuer,
$50 tn defendant used t. Toe uu'i-l in
s id uewsu fIcr cot IA hncl crncrruins the
N lntn, and dem,n ildeucu' r. damaged
hcrausc Of the unuhcltinu 81 this lt.ei o he
dcion i.ut. flrnntw = t. the cn.lpi .i.'t amoni
otncr Things AYERS that ths ,ruclp pm hsucd
concerur the plaintiff, ~ Ear as tie sano re-
lates to the plalniiir. was and Is tue. This mo-
order directing 'he dcf,nl,ni to furnish biii
o. tho particulars of hi, ~ fence of iutiacaiiou.
Mcssrs. G. sruu.t md Suliw n. " counsel Tor
plaintiff; Mr.. Hard Bartlett, Of counsel for de-
fcndant
p1intlH hrs hceh aulc {" clg ~ lpnort OF his
uotcl application j. thee Sc Of iltnn AIT. Dcceh-
81. 80 n. V, 10. l. seems to have been assumed
| th the Count OF Aple j. m tue decision ~ that
| case has pat forth some new and hitherto un-
familiar doctrine with reference to the granting
| Of applications for hills OF particulars. But en-
examination # this case will show that that de-
| custom WAS stricfN in accordance with the prac-
ticc before the Code aud Is IN entire harmony
with section 1is ~ fhe Code. rs amended In 1851,
| and does not support the position Of the
plaiDur on this motion. 1t is true
| - hlu Of particulars D. appropriue Tn al de
that il.cc acniinds that parry -noud be spprsed OF
the nater- tor which he IL To b. nut IN thai Win
grea,cr particular than T. required b. tue rues Of
| ileadns."
hy itseif onld sum n tho propagation that ptrtv TO
an acliun misn iu any case b, required 70 furnish
ANIMATION OF hr WI le otinion clearly shows that the
Spqr, M ". siS .9 ~ down any e'ne 81 broad
Just p,io, 10 tocu.c q The sentence which have
quoted. t.c lc lrncl Justice VIII wrote ne opnon in
tue Court 81 Appeals hat been calling attention tue
fact that when o OF paecria.. .polcI w. y l.
r.cri,i,, me- frs ', ~ y t
~ d. Ills o. IIH aN.I I.Il
or ~ md tha BE- .ucf ca.cs It rra1tc g. in,'cr of
r.ur- hut hat it j.. aio rr To- suppu., tha Dl' u
c.ra or ~ acos- Tor che recovery OF money ,ei4nl.
! n,..rt l4 90, 10 a.l ii'n he maNes U.s. OF the
iu .utpott ~ tn. rrop s.ion arc cited various au
pa.s. 90 .v,i a.l in tIctu,nt. o., ptu.f has necn
'' ioi"'. 'l ~ rsiieular- md n,' sls3 pa
courts have. h' ahtpry g. ir lra e" n civil acticrs,
aii .ai 100 fr1sn Il il v.y c,iua.on at'thc prc-cat
ci' fo urdet paiicu-lr go J., h' 10 "a action tor dc
i',t el 'N' ~ i'n err, 'Vih Fo,c aln i," a
] ~ I', ihnc 10 IN t'e o. ~ N.'u aft- w %. =
| voice.
snel E 90 iHes.. s',i nd lriy re -iliu l2 lr.-I
/ q " g. hrl end ' r., be- so'-t .,fcretce 10 f"g
4nntet VI n w tat ~ almost ~ ~ MINI ~ g., il
c rssaf 20 tar trial tai Poe shou Dc sPprisc ,oc.
! which he Is eApcciei t, meet tho court
| las authority % compel the ADVERSE party T.
eia ciss ausroa' c.s IA In, eoau.is All "a
isud Where the lAu 4 mas otcd oru~rcd To nj nil
~ ulsticulif- rat siurlt catu where such an
! ORDER hss Leu HlsIo a. sgan.t dcfendWt.
Ihs CONDITION OF the autuo -f'ic- wuu setru 90 show
That toe Court OF Appeals. determining the rfncticc
prior g. tns amendment 1851 t. oa IsS Of the
code nf rr1cc urc ui GUIDED tu Support tue prbn sition
a. II stated " the ie4rnoi ia. lee Who rose lie
up. n = tlat Court Father than tue one nr.t uboN
| quoted
hrrf examination OF the last clause ~ section i5s
vIu Glow Tot this vicN IN entire harmony WITH tie
pro,isiors - mat section
Thai section nf~r providing tuat fu actions hrau -ht
a., n al Account OF wntr@ al ACCOUNT IL rsr t,p0 a.
AmAttsr 81 arfcucr the alNrrs. tlly NV a. rt A. a
matter ~ M II particalafs ani that a. Court
uAy order further acc lut Nhtn the onf delivered 4.
defectve s,ys ai the Court NAV 90 all css ordrr
bin uar are Of ac a. am of either ny 10 be fur
| uisnea
Ills ~ he observed tnat under this clause Of ton
I5s Tie uoN or OF me Court 10 order MA az partirusrs
Is llHiffd 20 the cas, ciaua beug uadc upon un
uar. or fhe uther and 10 10 tue particular, 1f III. cf4
ouly Wu'ch can hc ordered.
Inc OF the word rfrirt this connection Gle irv
rpfers 90 deiuHuI fl- affirmative rsIief ami u-cd IA
ne sau.e SENSE ~ the WORD ed mand." I. m, a.-
clam or dtm4uf," and could never be applied To- a
fusre nvf0 lUn.
|cfInu Us " The Code having provided IN what
| "A ul parllru ord red follows
anaiirr %. conrs that iht court has no make