The New York herald., 1876-03-16
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURT-cHAMEERs.
BY judge Donohue.

VS. Hoes; Wiswell VS. Ireland; Tho Sixpenny Savings
Bank VS.. Many; Kitchen VS. Homberg; Scrymscr vs.
Murray; Chedncy Kircher--Granted
Doll VS.. Inness Order granted denying motion.
Cholwel VS.. Nichols. Motion granted.
Matter Of Wilhs.-Bai in 81, 900.
Matter OF Coleman. Bail IN 5000
Clcws VS. Payne.-BoDd approved.
Hebrew FREQ School Association VS. The Mayor, 6c.-
Granted. Tho default in this case should be opened
aud the decndsnts have leave to answer unless PLAIN
tn stpuae to let this suit abiee the event OF tho for
mer suit between these parties and in the meantime
stay all proceedings In the suit
Lockhardt vs.. Aster.-Granted The defendant ad-
ms that tor part Of the goods sued for he is indebted
tho OF $780, the rest hesets up defence to- The
painiin should have order ior that amount, but
without costs No costs TO tho defendant on the de-
fault.
Ilunkcn vs. Booman.-Scc foot OF bill
GoidschmIdt VS. Miclitcher.-Motlon denied, without
Ioancrs' Bank vs. Rynisen.-Siotion denied.
Ludlow vs. Hayward Motion denied. The statute
relieving examinations from costs is very general and
only gives them in extreme cases; there is nothing IN
this case tn bring IL within the exception.
Spohr VS.. l. Justices OF tho Co&ir OF Special Ses-
sions, &c-Monon denied All the, facts on which the
applicant rests his claim for this writ denied
doubt the power OF the Court 10 incrfcrc in this way
way with the record OF the Court Of Special Sessions
Stubbcn W. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS may take order for
appointment oil referee 10 take tiH testimony, but
without stay the referee must be the Judge OF the
necessity Of any adjournment for such testimony
Frank and another Hcsse and anotLer.-Moton
denied The makers of the noc did not serve an ail
davit OF merits under rule .
Teuionia Savings Bank vs. the Town OF Sprigport-
Each defence pleaded separately should contain III IT.
self answer IL IT fail IN substance or in proof the
other dcenccs remain There Is no necessity and II Is
irregular, therefore, to compel them The motion Is
granted for this reason.
Bellkampi VS.. Goodchd.-Counsci are requested to
appear on the 10th OF March, at 10 o'clock A. NJ.
Coping Copping.-l cannot confirm this report,
Matter Of Rdgeway. Motion denied
BY Judge Lawrence.
Margaretta McCollum VS.. Arthur McCollum Report
OF referee confirmed and decree OF divorce granted 10
smith VS. Pona-I deny ihis motion the ground
that u can only be madc-f II can be made by any
nton, setting forth the bankruptcy proceedings and
praying leave TO be allowed 10 come in and mako The
motion.
Bake VS.. Bendall; matter of the Guardian Savings
Institution; Bogc VS. The Asor Fire Insurance Com
pany; Truax VS.. Dodge; Dexter, &C, Meyer *
Knapp Engraving ComPany-urdcrs granted.
sUPREME coURr-cncurr-PART 3.
BY Judge Van Worst
Lyons VS.. Rosenthai and anothcr.-Case and amend
ments settled
SUPREME coURT-sPEcIAL TERM
BY Judge Van Worst
Littaucr VS.. Goldman-Judgment for plaintiff on the
demurrer with leave TO defendant TO terms
BucSng VS.. Hanscit ct aL-As to the hrst, second
and third grounds Of the demurrer judgment for
defendants; rs TO the fodrih ground judgment for
plaintiff opinion
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPECIAL TTRM.
BY Judge Curtis.
The People rel Kaufman VS. Kaumann.-Thc
papers submitted do not present for punishment
ior contempt.
Pratt VS. The Working Church Publishing Company
Order settled
Mccarthy VS. MoQuade ct al Order for commission.
Philips ; Gross ct al Flelschl VS.. Settler ct al !;
Jackson ct al vs. Burnet ct aL-Underakings np
proved
IIadden ct al vs. Colenan-Causc ordered on the
Jury calendar for March ~, 1876
Buncc vs.. The loDoken Coal Company ct aL-Judg-
mcnt for plaintiff Findings signed and nlcd
Whitney VS.. Whney.-Proof OF service OF summons
complaint not accordance with rule "a OF this
cuurL
Karchcr VS.. Berliner Order appointing Carl Gocpc
receiver, &c.
Kaufman vs. kaufman Memorandum.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM.
by Judge Robinson.
Fav VS. Galvn.-Order settled.
Joseph Walker VS. Eliza Jane Walker Temporary
ainony, s75 week; counsel fee, S500 See memo
randum
MARINE coUBT-CHANBEns.
BY Judge McAdam.
Hazard VS.. Conklin.-Opinon.
Collin vs. ParshaL-Re,crrcd to Mr. u. j. Robert
SON
Collins VS. Parshall-Monon denied; no costs
Thscher VS.. OfcutL--Motion granted, unless within
i've days the painuH pays SlO costs aud rcpIy
Harrot VS. rost; Hapln vs.. Naacc-Mouon de-
MED.
Carpenter vs. Grupe.--Moton granted on payment Of
$40 costs
Clark VS. Mccunn--Motion granted on payment of
SIS costs, &c.
Vanunc vs.. Grfnn.-Order settled and case nled
knrsbury VS. Campbell; Pinkenilh vs. Pohlman-
Motions denied.
Carr vs. Elder; D,rscc VS. Schron Roster VS. But
ton Havcns Oppcnhcmer; Mutual Bencnt Ice Com
pdny Percy; same vs.. Arch; Burns VS. sutro; IL
mau W. Friedman; onto VS. Meyer; Dingec VS. Glover;
Dtngce vs. Brnkerhoa; Bailey Machine Company VS.
Dien; Howard vs.. stewart; IIerOct VS.. Kleckmcycr:
Otto vs.. sugar; Schuyler VS.. Monat Marriage vs.
Krelng; Bsnl Id vs.. SchcDck wygand vs.. schniizer-
Motions to advance causes granted