The New York herald., 1876-01-18
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURr-cHAMBERs.


procedure be determined upon the settlement Of
the order which may be on two days notice
Matter OF McLean.-Report confirmed and order
granted
inquire the bona des OF the ownership set up
and the question is proper and must be answered
Bechstein vs.. Hirsch.-Motion granted Memoran-
DUN
Leeds vs. Ransom Motion settled rs proposed by
Matter of somerus Order granted
Derby VS. Derby.-Referred to John W. Lewis, 10
take proof to the ability Of the defendant TO comply
with the OF the decree and of report thereon
with opinion, the coming in Of such report the
motion can be brought ON two days notice.
Moore VS.. Seabury.-The $12 fee for posting notice
dsalowed There rs no law for it. and Judge Gilberps
decision upon mortgage foreclosure and special de-
cree Hero poundage is allowed to cover all services
specifically provided for in the statutes The mile
age is allowed plaintiff does not show anything
about 1t; attendance on adjournment dsallowed for
reason as above The charge for certificate or
sale allowed, as fair construction of the affidavit is
that il ten folios Printers fees allowed At
SIS "a; bill allowed less SIS
Borneman vs. Fisher.-Motion to continue inunc-
tion denied, and temporary injunction dissolved with
Matter of Madison avenue-Report confirmed and
order granted.
Van Vokenburgh vs. Doolitte e-0pinion
Pentlarge We. De ReesthaL-Aotion denied, with $40
costs to abide the event.
Wood PratI-Motion to vacate order OF arrest de-
NED with $40 costs
Wood vs. Pratt-Motion to strike out
sham denied with $40 COSTS
Decker VS. Brown.-Moton denied, with $40 costs
Memorandum.
Kelly vs. Morange Motion denied, with $40 COSTS
and stay vacated. Memorandum.
Uhl Levinger.-Habb's property is mainly IN
Mexico and he cannot be said to have anything like
So 900 worth of property in this State OF the
others are not what would like considering the shrink
age in value and the heavy mortgages everything
offered, but think fair residue of the testimony OF
the four suretes shows that they have justified sub
santally in SIS 000 TO that extent the undertaking Is
approved, but defendant must find another surety to
By Judge Lawrence
Gin vs. Guardian Savings Bank and Matter OF the
Guardian savings Bank-Refarence order to the Hon.
Joseph s Bosworth Memorandum for counsel
Matter OF Quinn.-Motion TO vacate assessment on
petition and proofs granted.
Matter of Mailard.-Referred to George " W. Bald
Memorandum for counsel.
SUPREME coURT-cIRcUIT-PARr 8.
BY Judge Lawrence.
Mutual Bank VS. Griswod Judgment for plaintiff.
Memorandum Of decision.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM
By Judge Mcneil
Bond vs. McNin ct tal-Case and amendments settled
Upon presentation Of an engroSsed or printed copy,
with all the exhibits inserted. the will be ordered
he.
McCan ct al. vs.. Caray.-Demurrer sustained. Men,
orandum for counsel
Knott Daily ct al-hotion denied; $40 costs 10
abide event Memorandum.
Home Life Insurance Company VS. Mela ct al
Findings settled Opinion,
Nickerson ct al vs. Ruger OF aL-Motion denied with
$40 costs, TO abide event.
ROussel VS.. St Nicholas Fire Insurance Company
Memorandum
McMurtrie ct al vs. Ortie ct al-0rder settled
Weston ct al Ketcham ct aL-Complant dis.
missed, with costs. sOpnion-
Moore vs. Moore-Opinion.
By Judge Sanford.
Coleman ct al VS.. Crump Memorandum
SUPREME ooURr-sPEcAL TERN.
BY Judge Donohue.
Perles vs. Perles.-Order granted.
Patt CarhardL-Judgment for defendant on do
murrer Opinion
Leeds &c. VS.. Ransom ct al-order signed.
COMMON PLEAs-sPECIAI TERM.
By Judge Joseph =. Daily
Bendit ct al va. Barker.-Appiication denied
Rone vs. Phfie-0ne term Zee only allowed, and one
bill Of costs
Parker VS.. Higenbotham--Recciver appointed on
terms; no injunction Opinion