The Middlebury register. [volume] (Middlebury, Vt.) 1850-1882, 1876-06-10

| Drake, Weybridee Allen Ketcham,
Whiting l. r Smith was appointed
foreman and Edward Gorham was sworn
as officer Of the grand jury
Petit jurors we're called and sworn as
follows T s Golf, Addison; N b
Phelps, Bridport G w Norton, W e
Dunshce, Bristol o A Field, Cornwall
G G Martin, Ferrisburgh 3 S Hooker
Goshen II j Flint, Granville. Hiram
Perry, Hancock D l. Smith Leicester
NJ b Cove, Lincoln S W Remele, j w
Halliday, Mddebury Ezra Knowles,
D i Collins Monkton n G Roscoe, j
r Nash, New Haven. u T. Griswold
Orwell Martin lloyl. pantou. II 1
Spoor, Ripton James Whitney Sails.
bury; Charles Witherell T. n Bissell,
Shoreham, r K Hill, b j Grinuell
Starksboro Ira Bingham, + W Zoe,
Vergennes II s Jackmau. Waltham s
f Wright Weyhridpe + 4 Casey,
Whiting.
| NJ Tripp, Howard CLARK. ID. j W
Barnes, W II Cobb sworn as officers Of
the petit jury T. W j Hawkins sworn
as court reporter
J II Lncia vs. ! T I'M. Apt. Lucia
and Hard attorneys for pltf Rider K
Lawrence for delft Action assumpsit on
note. The nominal plaintiff has no real
interest in the case. The real plaintiff ia
Ezekiel Hustled, of Illinois. 1t appears
that MIR Hustled had owned or claimed
to own a tract of land upon fIogback
Mountain. in Monkton, holding title
under quit claim deed given in ls4O. In
1853 he had gone West and been absent
until 1870. Then he came back, sold
the property by quitclaim decd to the
defendant John T Hill for which the lat.
ter gave him his note upon which this
action was brought to recover. The de-
Tense set up that Hustled had no title to
the land and therefore there was no con.
sideration The case was tried ut the
June term, 1875. when the jury failed to
agree, standing seven for the plaintiff and
Ave for the defendant. The case came
for the second trial Tuesday afternoon
and was given to She jury Wednesday
afternoon. The verdict was given upon
the opening Of the court Thursday morn.
ing that tho plaintiff recover the value Of
the note with costs.
Fits T. Avery VS.. J NJ Dyer, Apt.
AssumpSt for the recovery OF the amount
of saw-bill contracted in 1929 and 5
Defense the general issue and plea n off.
set for money had and received Attor.
neys for the pltf., Kingsley and Ballard.
For diff. Slade 4 Harris and Hard. The
case was given to the Jury at five O'Clock
Thursday afternoon Verdict for the de.
PENDANT S2l and costs on plea of Offset.
Cher5ino VS.. Hill. Action for frespass,
taking personal property. Defense. gener.
al issue with notice of special matter.
Attorneys for pltf, Grandey & Chapman.
For diff. Mardin and Rider
The work of the grand jury who finish.
ed their work Thursday forenoon is rep.
resented by the following cases
STATE VS., Lewis Gaudetts and Llcy
.4i7aSe. lndct for adultery
PreSentment of the common jail.
Found in very excellent cnndition
State VS.. Be'y Baaeg Larceny Bill
not found
State VS.. Gordon SeNsel. For perjury.
Bill not found,
State vs. l. D PenlJsr Assault Bill
not found.
STATE VS.. Edigin Barker. Obstructing
hjuhwav Rill not found
State VS., Orria Daw5rM Assault,
Bill not found.
STATE VS.. Henry Taylo,, Indictment
for bigamy
State vs.. Marx Pipsr. Indictment
for larceny.
State vs.. Edi0ard Gibson Indictment
for attempt to commit rape.
State vs.. Wesley HolOarl, Indictment
for larceny
State VS., Mandy McMalou lndict.
ment for assault with intent to kill.
STATE VS. Dennis McGo1dyicl. In.
dictment for perjury
State VS.. Albert Danisis indictment
for attempt to commit rape
SAFE VS.. Nelson King aud AprWa
Fales. Indictment for adultery.
Stale VS.. Henry Pecp, Anthony Por.
ter, Francis Daniels alias Franci, Cola.
mel. Indictment for larceny
An information was filed BIZ the states
attorney
STATE vs. Frank A FAR. For selling
Intoxicating liquor -