, 1876-06-12
1nlthnt cnsc, the defendant Brandt tlcmurrcd to

-7---=--@---:=:--@
!n!that ease, the defendant Brandt aetnursea % 70
and he appealed. The Supreme Court enter
tained the appeal, and overraled tho
court below: inc case to-day was precisely
Mnn.~om.rr a"a,a ,,ts,,,r, " 3", , ~ ,,.oons ~
mon.omesy w. co',,..} p,e'.'c| .ou,t iol la'eenJ'
He dem,lsrcd to the Indictment, which was OVER
ruled and he nppca]etf The Attorney.f} }enerat
elsI ,,a.Io, T., .,t.,,,,.. ~. ,rnasi ~ .hn
u.s' .ao."" !" o'''n.s' .nI appsa', ,o' .he
az iut1Rncn..
Th, c,tn,or If ~. f.o,-+ -. r,o,,,e, h.,
GU, ins I pp'"Ion u 'ne ."u'l va" P'ePa'eo "
The Code pfoy!des. Sec. 4, no; "Tbc mods ot
reviewing In thc aunTcme Court any Judgment or
tskenn np ppnt after Judgment, and then h only xlthin
oRf 81. yea5 559,'aa i; h.,s.r II, Wort. ,nas
mons" n thn 1T .cc,Ion ,nc.ns s nai iudpmsn
Or n,,v tntrrmriIlttt ,iccision Or indrincnt
nec aoSd na1s nafn 10 6e
word 'iudrneni, "as uscd in &c, i. bSo. dos
nGt s a, NJ sGfa r.: efsa
irc.Ion e1ecnt thc anal jndssocn., Until the
}ra,.t care. soS two ynars or lcss snce; md even
that casn nrc NJ. In hsvr bean h.nrd In thle Court
in the t:p.t in.tnncr' in nu,snsnea ui ."m. sysse
mcnt between counsel fof shc State and defendant
no reference to # in thc reuoft AMI il uu,t have
be.n decided On motion. lid no opinion written.
Tic taes tass thsts !; 70 tsse;i ot any ssss y:
tnken, and thereby Tic construction given The
clus1se1Y spcs5s. u % E.pses,y W. il Ill t,s wEcn
this snteal, ai1t other. now nsnjlnr In ths Court
have 10 promptly fo,lnwcd thot 1cctsion il Il
Moh.ble. y eysn po..ille fiat 70 occasion &C;
which bss cispseJ since thai dcc.iun.
Tic fsct tfat auch eonstrnctIon has been given
shat statute by the ,ar due. not bind III. nor il il
srony ioie.,lon .at tha co.teuetio sp.eed On
cft 4 s Geneat's @ Il IL; xlsw ~o
The rieh ir' 10 'apcsl !. ri eiyen by See l. ao from
es.ay eea! e1s apes sta bs uai I'll h
he es wnf see Eas
r. v5a, 5I,,, sa = ~ @ Gn':sd tSm
ment bn. to slcn li.nit a. to tcsIo,I mi ma, n
t. & w sor!a1S % ns; a 20 sp
Judgment hA. been rendered. The only rcaanil
given In the i5rant cnsr for different construction
codes 'jndsn,rnt' in Sec j. of,o of the code ii
ton IN tue revision II lago md al-e. nt VI have
seen. In SEC !. ~. Code Of lH7o Dut ths pos
Hcsses ne risntncanee. hccauac:
1T sos "a spcd TO- u es., "etSns Clean
y arid thont douts means final judgment,
=. That s'oae. in SEC. T. 8li provide, that all
nnn! adiud! in ctrit actions are judgments;
but n-es~A expruss provision Is made Is to Grim.
!naI actions:
4 Scs. oas o. tnat Cole provide; that that,
may bs reviewed IN shc suprrme Court. II b..
came necessary. therefore, to provide tint uny
| tuch Judgment or or!er could only be reviewed
after dnai Judgment. u It wan tho Intention u
me l.cSna.afs ..t ~ JndEn,snt ~ osac. saon.a
uponennrr aa''' p''a' 'oas''c"' Vt o'"'' "u'
!. Rerison, Fec. =, let, codo ., a4n, defines d
acton, onittiny the word - civil. F." contained in
the Co,le .! lX:,I.
!; l., Then iolIuw: RsviFton. &c; oon. Code
Tin; H., y te,aa"n M 70 IN es'n,na %
wora s.6n.] fn,m tJ,e ssctinn int r'grrrd 'tc to
logically foIIor. ths uthrr rhan'. nndc II aver,
nnnl ndludientton made il iudc,ncnt, t6et
ss;,s, s;ts f,n sa be onsi y: spSs, /" nn., e9 aa.
p'orls!on l. made 10 sac contrary And d the
fra eapf,e pTaca .s an appras pa.! I'm! oe 'aSsH
aetiop ~ bu a1o ny ~ u s,e nrnY,san ~ a, Il
taEeu from tac judgu'vpt which II dual adiadlcs.
tion.
Justice Day flies tho following supplemental
opSissa; pAiisaHr, ..n,,.,,,, no ,,,r,au,, .n,n,on !,
State rs. Brandt, yet my conclusion that the ap'
nsal could BE- entertansd va. grounded alln.,
WHOLLY npon lhc !ast mat noth parties requested
spseay dstermna'ion q r. q'iseiion pre;eMted,
he nj nhnn II h,,a lr1
hnys ~ M Iuubt tkat. hmm thit eronnd the auncu
wan properly entertained IN tint care The presen
case differs, in my judgment, In a most satefin
aud vital aspect. Here motion to dismiss thu ap
. peal was made In !t"tnt.
now conc,tr with nj brothers IN holding that
whese stch nioioM u tlme!g 1ItsrIofca; ~ apIth
sntsr,a1nr sase' 't'ha ueua'Fe' Dans n'' "
, e">e..asasu
1MiAlLH1An .H1, GAess n TIE SUPREME COUNT. =.
t a. 1g & ,' S. % u saa,oau az sssto' se"g on +,
Ioa'iY y useeoa.-i M 10 N " aet'9h 80 tSsssas
tlc confession of t93es Tor 1873 On talds grhhte
@ 10 luz aa roaa I'd Gopanf and p 10 oeenrS ,n,s .s Il.
taine H!ega1 anu p!la. ihe Coust be!o" als
cnssed Lug flalGtih.s pctlt1on, atu t"i,llrfinct
tie ,a1 % al.c pinaInt,ii appealed, anu tns , ~ y,
p1eine pei,, Io1st h1as te question u ~ l
paintifl' At ttc time thG taxcs were icse,1, hnE.
sush III interest VI tt's N the ln,'as TINT the
Tere subject To- ta5at,en; 1o anusr the act -
GonGFees of May L., 1871, granting 70 II
> SshtG lands ior Tue u,e .! railronus
thc statc = only trustee, anu acquires no t't'
; to tnS lana H., unth the , terms q INC grant ~
solapiied WIN " tiit Aa',foaa Companies Ill u
, on,iulng q o. te r1a'l, 4hH on tsic isstianer VI
Patent ine Aaliroaa COMPANY asqnlreu Il n
t1ie 70 Inc ianu nht1i " hna earheu IL ny hnl't'