The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-03-14
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
IN MONUAV, MHTtH ID, I5I
Present. all the Justices.
CHIEF JUSTICE LuDELINe

No. 6104. Parish OF st. James VS.. Hun
sacker. Judgment reversed.
No. G172 Thomas vs.. Walker. -Judg~
moht affirmed
renapded. .
No. 6lgl Comptonvs. Sanford. Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. GIT Andrews vs. Biossat. Judg-
uicnt amended.
No. 6O97. Marqueze VS.. Bernard -
Judgment reversed.
No. Gl6G. Sballars VS.. Hardee -Judg
ment reversed.
No. Cl3O Board OF Health vs.. South
worth. Judgment reversed.
No. 5G13. keilley va. Howoll.-Judg-
ment reversed.
by JUSTICE TALIAFERRo.
No. G1G1. Chevallier VS.. Dias. Judg
ment reversed
No. eioa James VS.. Henderson -Judg
ment amended.
No. 5s77. City of New Orleans vs.. For
gusop. Judgment affirmed.
No. 6203. Flower vs. Layssard. Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. el7a. Halsey Va. Lanse.-Jndg-
ment affirmed.
No. 4643. Lauher VS.. Railroad Com
pany Judgment reversed.
No. 62i1. Rousseau VS.. Marionneaux.
Judgment affirmed.
No G222. Schlater VS.. Gay.-Judg
No. G2s7. Meyer vs.. Johnson.-Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. GAS. Wells VS.. Norton. .-Judg-
ment affirmed
No. e227. Nachman w. Le Blanc.
Judgment affirmed.
No CTS. Nehl VS.. Faggert. Judgment
affirmed.
No. 5oe1. Lewis vs. Colhoun. judy
ment affirmed.
No. GIGS. Ware vs. vinoent.-Judg-
ment affirmed.
by JUSTICE HOWELL.
No. 1879. Succession Of Villains.
Judgment amended.
No. bG17 Benham VIZ. Oarroll--Judg-
ment reversed.
No. 6O9l. State OK rel. st. Martin vs.
parish of st. Charles. Judgment
anpulled md case remauded.
No. 610i. Chopin vs. Forstall. .--Case
remanded.
No. 6l49. Hickman vs.. Willett.-
Judgment amended.
No. 6t55. Newell vs.. Shaffer. .-Judg-
ment affirmed.
| No. ele2. Succession OF Calhoun.
Judgment reversed. r.y
No. 6i74. Penn VS.. Farrenburg. -
4
No e17y. Leissy VS.. Tanner. .-Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. sls2. Walker VS.. Mccoy. -4Judg-
ment amended. .E.E
No. G1s7 Hoy vs.. Peterman. Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. 62Os. Moss. Wise u Go. vs. John
son. Judgment affirmed.
| sa4 i py JUSTICE wyLy.
No. e214. Succession OF Anderson -
Judgment affirmed.
No. G2i9 Delpeck vs.. Murphy, Gaines
e Co.-Case remanded.
No. 465i Campbell vs. Fowler. --Judg-
tnent amended.
No. slss. Shoddy VS.. Van Fossen. Case
renanded, .q ..r
No. Cl7O. Nachitoches VS.. Redmond
Judgment amended.
No. sgos. johnson VS.. Crowles. .-Judg
mont affirmed. r W.
No. GosG, Rathbone VS.. st. James. -Ap-
peal dismissed. 4..
No. G15O Norton Il Stevens w. Citizens
Bank Judgment amended.
No. el59. We'll vs.. We'll. Judgment
affirmed.
No. s2o2. Bayley & Pond VS.. Woil.-
Judgment affirmed.
No. e2ae. Harris VS.. Police Jury, -Ap-
peal dismissed.
|
ment affirmed.
No. 6l75. Davidson VS.. Davidson. -
Judgment affirmed.
No. G2OO. Bridge vs. Ennis. Judgment
amended
No. 6O27. Richardson vs.. Cramer.
Judgment affirmed.
#E ny JUSTICE MORGAN.
4 No. GO56. State vs.. McKiDney.-Ap-
peal dismissed
No. COST. state vs.. Hill y Vincent
Judgment affirmed.
No. 61S4 Rodgers VS.. Dennis. s.-Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. e225. Kahn VS.. Gay.-Judgment
affirmed.
Judgment reversed.
No. 5673. Iabaune VS.. Slack. -Judg-
ment reversed.
G132. Citizens Bank VS.. Bailey.--Judg-
ment affirmed.
} G2i2 Clarkson vs.. Williams. s.-Jude'
ment reversed.
61G3. Calhoun vs.. M. and +. Bank
demanded.
G22o. Murdoch VS.. Harper. Judgment
affirmed.
e235. Hyatt vs.. Police Jury.-Appeal
, dismissed
Gl8I. Marsh vs. Lewis u Boniol.-Case
remanded.
GIL. Osborn VS.. Guss. Appeal dis.
missed. ~
GlGO. Briefly vs. Taney. Judment re.
: versed.
62l5. Davis vs.. Williams. Judgment
reversed.
G,s9. Berwin vs. Weiss. Judgment
: affirmed.
eO99. Pradat vs. Legare. judgment
, affirmed.
eI59. Sentelle & Co. vs.. Barron. Jndg
ment amended.
6O55. Marshal vs. Vale. yudgmen,
affirmed. Mr.. Justice Wyly disscnts..
5000. Hickman VS.. Tompkins. Jndg
rnent reversed.
United states Circuit Court.
Present, Hon. w. B. Woods, Judge.
It was ordered that the jury commits
> sioners Of this court select, as required
by the rules, the names OF 400 good ant
, competent men to serve as jurors dur
) ing the present term.
r. M. Ames vs.. the New Orleans, Mo
, bile and Texas Railroad. This case wal
/ argued and taken under advisement.
First District Court.
Present, Hon. Il. Abell, Judge.
4 Watson Buckner, on his own plea 0
guilty OF larceny, and Willis Clay, con
, victed OF the same ofTen5e by jury
were sentenced each to Imprisonment II
> the Peuitentiary, the first for eigh