, 1876-09-21

pn1oKs. Those who arc not in favor will
vote for HAYES and WHEELER.
THE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES.
!" Live within your income" is tho advice
which hlr. TnDEN says he gave tho Secre-
tary Of the Treasury in 1869. He now init
mites, and tho Democratic party charges, that
this advico has not boon followed, but that
the Republican party has managed the atfairs
Of tho nation 80 improvidontly that it "has
takon from tho people, In Federal taxos,
IL times tho whole amount Of lega1-tendor
notea, md sqnandored four times tho sum
in useless expenditures" "Reform" lnv-
ing beon adopted by tho Democrats as tho
catchword Of tho campaign, they have spread
this s tatomont abroad through their pnrty
platform, in all their campaign documout is,
in their party newspapers, on tho stump, in
priyate discussion, and every other device Of
tho canyass- Yot It Is more partisan gon-
eralization without my basis in fact. Thoro
has never boon 30 little money squa'.dcred at
any period In the history Of the Govern-
ment Notwithstanding the largo amount Of
money necessarily e1panlod to lofray tho
cost Of the War precipitated by tbs Demo-
1 ~ n''..;:;,"a.. t"ssy1 - ,n,.a r~'ss.
49, ...s!,,.> ,,s..1 ,.,n.:' H., ,ss. -, ~
.,4 s' ss 49, .,- 49, ~ ss...,.4a,
' a.s.,,ss '' :. s s'.,.. 49, ss:,sN
49, r. f ~. ~ ~. ' ~. f''
Tho ofllcinl statomont Of Assistaut-Socre
,rroosnrr - !. - aon,,atn % ~ ona,ra, ~ .,,a no,no " NV
..a.; ss,.ahao,, ~ sha,rs .,nt ~ s .,'a s ",'.;s.
ssss... - ss-s1 ,.e.o, e.a.., .1,s -.us," | ~
a. 49,. - ,ssss. ~ .,,, 49,.
.as,s .,.u;sn. ~. IT, 49,. ..s.a1 T., 49,
non,ooratio ~ .,.ie r,otfo,r, rha aronnt ~ ,nonav
.r1,,a,, IN e nn,nao~o,a ~ .harao ~ has h. % 1,ss1
w..,n.n;,a.oa - rsa,aa, oxaas.,n :. .an,a
,,rss 1nnd,s, - .1;n;on. ~ ,,o~t t1on was 49,. a-
.,aat,oa fa- 81, a. or.1;ua~,, .~naa;,,.n~,, =,
H. ~ Gouaxa.na,,t. - -, tl,,a ho.;n 49, c"na..
'ao 9ose1nnonIi VI tn's oa7'H ''e S,osesn-
'n'41 eao'nu wv .'"so pun out aonAs I'VE
sal.ous e~oIHoo' o1s ''u ~ 49, aoAo a!e- 70
1o'.oas WY "aso ~ eonn ,"o nv uo'us oon ., lo
nouIns ono % sa'.a s1uv'ooe'ouo n" ~l'neu. .
.ns'1B uus "'a",n' -" .!'.sa 49, "ao ~ 1tas
'.o "o'ot 1,'sons -, 1a' i'Sa,s' " 'a'"o,''7
" 49, ~ puuno eoo., aua 1ea"s''4 ts'A1''A =,
| Soo'''oo, ~, - "a.o ~ LUZ ,'e" P"S'os Wv
uoo' =; 1Ao ioe''P'a ~ .u' uosefni''""'
,tvn ~ aoaioas W. .u. l.Ss., A1olo .uah @ uue-
na, wha' .tey "ele ~ .no c'ose u 'ae "al,
'nu ,n' a'suaA oApoh''.ufes toi ai purposes
arc 4esa tnan one one-nat waa1 taey wore ~
tna1 1'l'o' III looo tno net ie'dauc ot tae
aoYcfn1nens was sooo, o,oos'o-o; ana IN !o'o'
SSo1,4os'o3'' III loeo Inc nes current es-
poaa'tafea M were s'@o,eo9.4lo' anu IN le7o'
S2oo 'f'',1of' uestlte thls enormous re-
duouon' 9hofe has not oeen eln8'e year
when tlo Government did not have sur
plus, with Which u reduced tho Democratic
War dobs from S:,3i+,aS3 III one year to
ss13o, OIL ,S35 IN another year, making an
aggregate reduction Of $3.50, ,oo9, ,248. This
does not look much ~ though we had been
living beyond our income under Republican
administration.
foFhaps 'he oost test OF nm 1ndlVlinais
living within his income IL Lis orodlt' and the
Same RUG may DO nppl1ea to eoVernments'
rms institutes comparison between tit
democratic and 1sepabl'oan administrations
Which tho Domocrata might bottor have
avoided. We have Shown how the Nepub
'aoaas haso maAa8oa 70 MAKO tho eoVesa
mont hvo within It's income, anu the result II
:. that our Government was aolo to negotiate