The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-01-11

Plaintiff enjoihed the sole ttnder n II. H.
issued In favor of defendants against
their Judgment debtor. from whom
plaintiff had acquired the property
seized. Defendants In these proceed
ing eannot plead stimulation, but should
resort to the revocatory action. yudg-
ment affirmed.
By Justice Howell
No. 4tOy. G. II. Philips vs. Blakemore
Bros. N Co.. appellants. The power OF
defendants agent. bean. to draw upon
them the draft s,ied on Ia not estab-
lished by the record. Judgment re-
yersed
No. bt77. State OK rel u. Burton vs.
jackson, appellant. Appeal dismissed.
No. 5sGi. VIM. Culliman OF als. Us.
City of New Orleans. appellant. Plain
tifrs enjoin tho collection of n license
tax for 1875 upon vehicles owned by
them the tax not being equal and uni
form, being based upon the number af
horses and not upon their value, is I'M
constitutional. Judgment affirmed
No. 5s74. g. y. Frantz vs. VI. Wagga.
man ct MIS-. The Judgment appealed
from not. being signed, tho appeal II
dismissed.
No 5ss9. Mrs. NJ D. Stone VS.. Faeul..
ty Medical Department University of
Louisiana, appellants. Judgment NJ
triued.
| No. 5gt5. Succession of John A. Mil
| ler Deceased wns n resident of Mis-
slssippi. died IN that btnte. aud his sue
ression was opened both there and IN
Louisiana. All the heirs reside In Mis-
sissippi. Appellant, one OF the heirs.
opposes tho account He'd by tho admin.
| istrntris In Louisiana. on The ground
! that by said account the amount of two
drafts. which she alleges were donated
to her by deceased. is made subject "
collation.. II Is no part of tho duty of
IN administrator to effect n partition
between heirs. Judgment amended SO
as To- reserve opponents right to contest
the charge against her IN any future
proceedings.
No. coil Southern Bank, appellant,
vs. Louisiana National Bank et nj.
| Plaintiff Us holder Of certain coupons
annexed to bonds Of the city,. alleging
that the city had. as required by law,
levied tux for the payment of said
coupons. and had deposited these funds
| In defendant bank, It's fiscal agent and
alleging that plaintiff feared that the
city would divert these funds from the
purpose for which they were. collected,
aeuliestered tho same; held that The
| collection Of taxes and their deposit In
bank vests no titlo to the fund In the
| holders OF coupons. for the payment 81
which the taxes were levied. and such
holders cannot therefore sequcstgr sueh
funds as the owners thereof. Judgment
III, ~, T,,.t,,. wvlev4
~ 'uso'oo 1.yn wi,i,,,., and ,,.i,a of .Iulieu
No. e4Ho. wauW W. ,u's - ~ ~, 49,
.,eEno,s vs. M',n Wy. - ',yu lin, ,sa rnf,,sad
bel,tl,,,s. mo.,un ~, w. ~ n,,,,siloes ,,of
.he 'alluIs W .,ya vao =, dHpisoo'
pesns as,,'Vs.,p Ha,, Ma, Mo,ady io We WIN Nal.
g No. pg's; M. n II "aII,,s.l, a,n,ella,,fs
COY nnu Muy -. vaoTn,, nv. ,3n npe,nt n,"n,,t
Juaglnent a'nenueu, ...od no ao.o 1nsV - H.
80 gy .no ;.s, ,.,,,,.,.d ~, ,,,ortoaoe
.ous '.. .,,' ,.i,,ia ',,',,,,,,tv snld, ,nnst Go
app' ,t .,o W "pViv ~, p,rl,"ncds nf tho sale,
bae baa' ysg ;er ,.,,,, is tLa divoraed wife
~. pla.itl,l, WIZ III. l.io =. t.ar s,aso
y. " ~. ssfs ssss..y., :. t.t..i'' s;ati,,y nniv
on tno co,,.'uu'i.y 'ay .,.,,,,.. ,.,,,..; ;ning
ous- ,ou'e ~ ~, ~ - IL ,,,ta
asso. KY t,.ts Observation-Disclosures va q Hanks
~, No'yvs9. s,,',,, q, :, ,,ri.r .,,nah
Ine ,,,'',. Z '..a.,,,, ,,.,,.";,, ,rhc i,ria.
lnR .ho 'nu,oe,uouv .,'..'.' 60, H., .3,,,,;
dietlon ot ti,e s9up,en,e Ipue ~ .'' ~
ilhl cases usp'nu'uus pn ~ svy i..,,,e, a,,,,rl
7 ssn.enc. p''ss3u ss},ha,,, p ;,,iadi,'iio, AZ
.n., eno.. a,u.,,.T !. - TT"'o"' '"' ''''''N''"'
No. b5't. ,'la mtnsms !, Mn",,'''''''' iinn. '"s'
COMPANY Ns; .'.,i au"a a,,,;t,, (. n 90 N
., no. peIv. ..Iaanr .,siao' 80 nl T,,done,,t
moey,d ny.,ouv,, y, ~ 49, i,areas" tbe Jn,nauss
enaea w 5,.'' " -, a..'ou a,,d ~ f,ther re-
,sllowe. s.a ~ u..a'''"'''' ""' -
speceii i,1,,.,n mui,,.'ru m,rgo.
~ 'uss"s ens,e 49,, at's - ,,l r. Il Meux Va.
~. V'srr H. r,,,tih bist,ict Court,
ymuge =, Tue ,,,,. n'',,a ,,r,,,,.riv diamisscd
.l Inc ,uasp l,o lo,,rrity riatv'Ya w., tbe bond moi
,na nppo",i ''u n,,t,, ny u;s,y,,isacd
pesns ens, gpy"' a,a'a 'o ~ e'' 81" C,,son appel-
70 %'ag re..a,,,t PLY r1,1n,n,j 11, bave been nj.
,ant. ',m Deio,n.. n,, t,,,' inv liz rlca tbmt
.pmeu - s"vt' bo,,in & vas nrrscribed
1no 'nu,c.,,alndi .l..'.,..l'd ''''''' '''
o1se 'u.a nnna sxa,e 90 Milton Cnrodine.
,.. no. oveo' .s,;,,n.d 'r1.,a ~ ''''D wv
'nmgp'nsm. mp en-. ".,,no a,,nen,'ai,n If Thomaa Il.
No. M M. .,,.oss'in,, nu.o waa onened jn the
1,;tr.,.s C',,,,t fnr tho parish of
I1eaonu .I -" IT, '. tosta,nentarv exac,trix
ulleina, ,s,..Isnad HI, III ihcyain gnRsen,,entjy
w Nus lna1,,. luna1,,,"o"d nd,n;,ietrator opened The
tne Pupiao '.'''hI,'tab =, IL nnyiab ~ plao,le.
su.uas7'grr, No. ~, IL, ,,,la hercin taken by d
n.l,us. .nn,s.r 'D at the esa,,te to transfer all
u...''' v,.roocIinoa In the latter parish
i,nipv In nnn.ul n Judgment. judgment
reversed. - .m m T. n.a.