The New Orleans Democrat. (New Orleans, La.) 1875-1876, 1876-02-11
COURT NOTES.
United states Circuit COurt.

Present. Hon. w. B. Woods. Judge.

United states Circuit Coart.
Present. Hon. w. B. Woods. Judge.
New indictments were presented Thursday
morning against John Henderson and John A.
Washe tor defrauding the Government Of the
guilty Vim. II. BertSelot and john R Rsi MS
were accepted as sureties on the bonds t$5OO0
Mrs. M. Priscilla Metcalf Va. Louisiana Leyee
Company and Silas ". sawyer. The auit was
Daniel N. Gary and Alfred ). Cowan were ar
Henderson. and pleaded not guilty and gave
Alex; Norton. subrosated, vs. Martin Tally
Verdict was In favor OF tho sIbrogated. with
mortgage and lien on O piece Of ground In
Shreveport for t4s6g 60.
+. +. Case. substituted, vs: q. Martin 4 Co.
Tho Grand Jury returned their findings,
which. on motion OF the United States Attorney,
wore placed on tho secret files Of tho court and
until Monday next.
Superior Distract Court.
Mrs. Kavalago and J. b. Camors w. Merchants
Mutual Insurance Company Motion and bond
through 9uass g. attorney i for tho
Insurance company. Transcript made return
able first Monday IN March.
In tho case of Germania National Bank vs.
Crescent Fire Company No. Acknowledgment
process was issued against the Firemen's Char
In tho ease Of Mrs. Louisa .Maonhaut Vs. the
Church Wardens Of tho Church ~. Louis.-Judg-
ment was rendered against the defendants and
as tne s2s S OF h9 Rowan
the sum Of $4,000 with per cont interest from
the ist of February. 1874. and per cent Aheroon
10 hScRsgSosa ,Vss O. filed on the 10th Of rebra
airy, 1876. y suit on two promssory notes Of 5000
each, against benjamin. !. Flanders. IdquidatorI
claims recognition. enforcement and sale Of
tho property nortgaged, and payment OF his said
demand. with interest ut per cent from tho nth
OF June, 1876, and per cent for attorneys ices.
Superior Criminal Court.
Present. Hon. II. II. SteoIc. Judge.
Case OF Alfred Shelly. Ordered that the writ
Of babeus corpus sued out herein be made abso-
lutte. and the prisoner. being brought to the bar
The case Of Alfred Craps. charged with the
crime OF murder. was called and continued I'LL
morning. =,
tor and Frod Hawkins. charged with carrying
concealed weapons: Dan Mullin and Mike
Mcnamara. charged with assault and battery.
and Vim. Il. Ingram charged with embozzlement.
First District Court.
Present. Hon. Il. Abel. Judge.
Arraigned nnd Plead Not Guilty: Harriet Nc.
Kinney. Louis Smith. Josephine Mellon and
Joseph Pearson. Charge. assault and battery.
second District Court.
Hon. A. L. Tissot Judge.
The time OF the Court has been much occupied
Halpin TIE argument on the charge brought
against the n,Dte sued on In the first succession
as forged has not yet concluded Inc issue "
raised that II. Lloyd had no title had not traced
nor proved 1t: was not owner Of the note sued
on. and that the snid note was forged. A volu,,
minous pile Of testimony has been taken and
soon the argument will close.
Yesterday came w the grand question In tho
Of Halpin, marriage or no MARI
age" and additional testimony on the cross
examination Of u Witness WINS taken
Fourth District Court.
Present. Hon. B. L. Lynch Judge.
Mrs. Clara Fontenette, wife Of ID. Lambert. w.
her hlsband.-It was ordered that tho custody
and care Of the children, issue Of the marriage
the plaintiff with permission to the father TO see
them when he ploases, and provided that they
shall not be taken out Of the city; r.r
Mrs. M. Il. BarremOre Vs. John McFeely.-
This is suit for $4,000 damages alleged to have
becn sustained by. plaintiff from, tho said de;
fendant fHr election from ms asa ho % th e as
that for the months Of April and May, 1879
her warS them ,er
and repeatedly demanded the certificate to sell
It and pay in cash q 90 to mako up the inll
detention 81 said certificate amounted to dation
on Placement etc, The case went over to ~ m.
or to-day. The Judgment of the Justices Court
In favor OIL McFecIy. WIS TeNeIseu vi Hppeai.
Firth District Court.
Present. Hon. T. North Cullom. Judge.
Peter Schmidt vs.; Carl Kannengieser;- The
objection to tho admission OF parol evidence
was sustained and said rule dismissed.
Louis Fix " +. Waggaman. Sheriff. ct al
II WINS ordered That the injunction, herein issued
perry described in hls petition, W.,
W. I'll. Hogan OF al w. mississippi Wiley
Observation-Disclosures was for tho plaintiffs for tho
sum Of s925 W. with legal interest from June tho
9Th. 1874 with privilege and preference on the
Augustus heichard VS.. r. Michinard ct als.--
This Judgment was for the plaintiff for the sum
Of sim o. with eght. per cent interest per an
was continued for service on the other defend
ant. J. J. A. Plauche.
J. b. Connors h 90. VI. jean Pomez..Judg-
ment was for the plaintiff for the sum Of t1211.
with Ave per cent interest thereon from June n.
Samuel Echberg H. Co. W.. M Jacobson mo-
ton of counsel for plaintiff John Mannion. was
ordered to show cause on the LIST of March, 1876,
why hG should not be condemned TO pay the full
amount Of the writ Of Q, 70 herein issued for the
sum Of 1861 u.s. with interest NJ seven per cent
per annum from April !. 1874.
sixth District Court.
Present Hon. A. Saucier, Judge.
Tho Jury found In the case Of Chastant vs.. Luz
arus for the plaintiff for the sum Of $500. and re-
lected tho demand In reconvention Of the do
fend4pt.
In The suit Of Rouse, West h Co. va. Gerod &
Go. The verdict and the Judgment were In favor
Of the plaintfI for tho sum Of fs7Q5 g. with per
cent. interest from the 2stl Of April. 1874.
Vincent 4 Co. W.. Arnold Danziffer. Tho iudg
me,t was for the plaintiff for the sum Of si57 IA.
with s per cont. interest per annun on s243 50
f.om August 1Ath 1875. ON 500 from August 18th,
1876. and on sis ~ from judicial demand.
Mrs. p. A. Agclasto vs. A. Paterachi. OF al;
Tho judgment was in favor Of plaintiff, - and
docreseiEg the two nets OF sale mentioned and
nufl and void and decrceing that the
defendant be diyested 81 ara tho pa.gtiir In
perty aforesaid. and that the plaintiff. without
Tho assistance OF her husband. be authorized to
her s0porate and paraphernal pro-
perry.
The case Of the Louisiana Artificial Stone
Company w. Jordan Shawle5 was on trial be-
for0 a Jury
ADJUSTMENTS.
ACADEMY OF Music. Benefit tonight