New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-03-23

TINS TRIBUNE stcnographer who took the portion Of the
testimony referred to. had left the rooml , ..
Judge Nelson ITO other reportcrs Have you got ~
Mr. FueronIIa any reporter got her testimony as 70 tho
time when Mr.. and Mrs Bows went to California;
Judge Neilson-Tt is back some ways.
Mr. Poer- will appear 10 the printed report in the morn
ing.
Mr. Fuerton-I don't propose to adjourn for that purpose
want II now
Mr. Eyas-Iti is not legitimate inquiry II there is erro
in H. II confusion about IT, Is to be remarked on In
It's proper place We do not stop here to convict people .hey
run along.
Mr. Fullcron-No or we woud not have any witnesses len
Mr. Beach-The object Of this TO present that to the viii
! and ask her to explain IT,
Judge NelsonIt may be due TO the witness can't say
don't remember.
Mr. Nocross Of The Eagle here read the testimony referred
to- as follows:
40 Did David Dows family Tarryown that summc,
go anywheref A. think they did go away think they
O. do YOU know whit time they went A. They went when
first went there perhaps the part OF May but am mol
O. Did you remain at the house after they went Gail
forna A. don't remember; guess was there when they
returned. ,.
q How long were they absentf A. don't recolect
@ About how long! A. couldn't say"
Mr. Evarts-We, that is all.
Mr. Norcross-Stll reading:l
90 Which Of the family went to Californian A Mr.. and
Mrs. Dows think"
Mr. Evarts-That is enough Sir
Mr. Fulerton-No 1t is enough 1t may be enough fol
you.
Mr. Evarts-Thee but question asked her and that
was what she had stated the time when Mr. aud Mrs
Bows went to California
Mr. Beach-We let us know, Sir what she has said upon
that subject.
Judge NesonThe question whether she said they went
after she bad been there about month.
Mr. Evarts-That has already been answered.
Mr. Beach-No
Mr. Norcross-The answer is two questions below Tread
ingl
90 Which Of the family went TO California; A. Mr. and
Mrs Dows think don't know whether any went with
them or not don't recolect.
long did YOU remain there then, before you left A. think
| was there about two or three months, Sir"
Mr. PorerNow your Honor perceycs that this imputaon
upon the witness was entirely unfounded.
Mr. Fueron-Your Honor does perceive any such thing
Mr. Evarts--wel we don't talk two at once.
Mr. Fueuon-Wel, Sir.
Judge Neson-wel the witness does not appear to have
said that they after she had been there about month
The Witness-No Sir; did not remember.
Mr. Evarts-No Sir she stated exactly that they went afte
she got there and she thougc the latter part OF May and
they put in evidence dated the 18th Of May which
| speaks of her having come there the day before
Mr. Fueron-So that she went to California before she had
| been there a month"; which is all the better.
Mr. Eyars-No matter about all the better " that Is agu
inc the case The question whether you correctly stated the
| witness previous testimony.
Mr. Beach-we said about month, Sir She went there
about the middle May and she Mrs Dow left the latte
| part Of May.
| Mr. Fulerton-Less than month.
Mr. Poern other words their state ment was incorrect
Mr. Evarts-And hers was correct
Mr. Beach-Then was not favorable to ourselves w
might have made it, that /. the error that we fell into