, 1875-06-08


Tbs conrt held that 10 ,ha, c.., ot e.,eE.S Ia Of
equity poa.et,td tyery fscll,ty for pure:- noil.
ensrse, deessan asnsna. =. ~ itn";s .sSs' an
N. Harris; II il!no:., *, Eu.., ~. nm, fi'i
npts. 23. rcnple -. w,sn:: &, ri,irn Knnr
County Davis. 10 the eau II E.rc:, -, sn,,tii
tho supreme Court raid III VIA urr.d ths:
Tho Court h.d no jus!sdsrt,on o. H. lii.
Interfere 10 determine winch of two t+r.nn. H.. cer
s!e.ed 70 o'tce, 70 try the .ar.,f ast,ss 10
sa,. a ~ 'ss sns 'ss re. f:s IL: s III ,r1s
nj ire eonc.sed sitsttnn II II d.le::ntr where
M b1.. ,sa ,s ~ r..
s"l:t the 1ne%ion whether ,ha vote laa Leef. iii,
TAKEN, snaf fraud hss hs.u committed to surce III
4e hu9ar. entirely pertinent - sho earo at har
we're lrnnsn tn ,ieIerninc tho ,,ut.t.on wbsre tEc
c1ttens II county have lilo legal right to tranract
rab!ic bssn:.' n, c,se !. brooxat i. dtterm,ns "a
Inolnsa.. hut controlled by different principles.
Aad IN ~, e.." eouny..ea. cste, sht que,t,on
cidtnta!!y involved. Sur drea II tnaar any
difference m shs principle wh,el ahnuIa
se.t caars eontrolt.: In part by con.tsucn,,
and sa' esss 1t osr uy IN act Of the Less
'iatt IN Il. e..o Of Tt. reop,. 81. w,.a hi. ,.non.a. /,
nse': " 10 shls tl,4 iav has PROVIDED no ea,.s
Of eousesttnR ths .sfton or r".rec'ns tie vote thvre
tasna do moi for that zeAsnn sknv "a. WIZ thr ex-
pressed will Of tbe YntrEs nj til. county, thn design o{
lbs county, would 10 defeated unIcs. tho cotrtn ca
AFFORD rone'ly. Tlis IL ra.s nnl!Io
which shall exercise The power. aud ,ertor,n tic
d'tut Of the office IL that ca,s 'he snis!usls arA
IN ,hs case IT i. atct Of public conrern 10 10 pes.
lle Of the county In that, sheax afforded an alilc
remedy hy conforming 10 tlo statute EutufizinE hcsn
10 contcrt The election 10 sl.trmtnc wic. /. entitled
=, ~ tna olses. wh'e ~ t'a. no mean. arc ltosired
~ tno staiu's Tor Carrying Into Effect tha
Win wt ~ nee sjIf nnacr sae n.'
AZ. he:e: tsc aeec'yty Of t1nss5 to enrrt.:n j"r.
,s .t a95a rr+'c' Wits ~ ho!a That su,ty
t.ol ihat = kho no ~'r" tue contest of the r'cc.
ion : Il se os 1sssat ts,r :asi
to III. ". onl, substituting ths *orl "eity ior
coua'y.
and .hs ra!,. ii, ve -,:ei ier ny al4nrs. =: .rn at
l.a to hon. unts: The alt.g.oa<o of this bt. there
wss wait Of over in no Court tn 1a.4 n'so',
The subject mattel n tlts hill ma 10 Issue
"ezsepds to al acts that ars contrary to law and
pfc]uetsl 70 tho interests OF ths community aud fns
~hich .ae1s !. ~ AaeHha!e fe!utHF ~ az" ~ II,
os'. 0 -. hesa c. a. II teSo; - ~. lnttst
w. Gn'c1eo ~ ~ stne, Mott ~ ~. i. i. ca;
=. ~. IT, tsp!e ". mniteoiu: AanlpE.aj. ISL
| ~ sas.ty " t2hiA9n 1'sS "ltf' ol.t Aafu'hE ".
Il, 4; u Z 81. 4. H. H. - Ssns tsfi;' is.s
ds ~. sai'a - a.nss: y sls CO; ~ kvrs ys.
fsego aeose eitsd re s"isetaG Court Q! Pennsysan1
.h. r,t ~! S;11 ~ "I Eona'on @ Gaahca.
."sh a the sui: ot ahohes runs'eal body WIN weso
d"ly e:eco aud acting a. Common Counril, s.yna.
~ YET onI ~ III. ~ ~ nafAty Mnaaihs any aS as
'nse s'r.tiy sast wti'a tne as act Pssl.
dIesl u te tne'e%ts ~ te community ihan ot thas
eass ., - d-ep tnao or d9at .ni eoat.i,on on ihe
remedy " Injunction "as tho only adeau+e retneay
III snen a; sase' A.. .,-,
y 4ssa rfnseIna* taken subsequent 10 tue hfcAch u
| '1e to'"As'''n. % l'.s. -z,
I'll. ohou. .ns"sF .sa nas ns Contempt of ,h,
1foceht Of tue Court mi Al'as criminal aes WAN
Vt ~ t4t tower vi tue as;tts 10 waive IT. D4n1e
ch.neeEy lracsiee: i.t,i.
IL further sa.t shat. the sn!Hncton hasuR eea'el
OPERATIVE bstors sAe proceedings for confemr:
~ ae ssa sr s eanm' M MI ~ ay ~
s;thel ~ ~ - i Ea..r,. c. caaussry e DsS'Ss iss
no.t9 ios ~ st'asnmeht Tor contembt naae ats.r
Ms.o"on III ~ sns 'luAehlon eou,u not 70 supp9rte9s
ou!y afvly u ~ whtrs tls Injunction ". tefn,
ua'eu y & u ~ ~ ~ Inas.. ~ ~. u
q i, sAs ~ronstS! &C. of defendant. Thas po,n: il
,ae :. eesr ,,sa IN no' y. res' 1s. .1sso, ,,,z,,,
7HaF THERE uAs nfss pEt1ncNA4Er tS7ES71os-
of ths wrt Of njinann In this csso Ia not denied
Eew 1t;loe.*ae ~ " sst aso1risnee % Upon ths pass o.
hwsra On Monday 1porns.sbc .1th CT April lass ths
bill tor Tie tajnu:tion rf.lunte4 by sa complain
ants solicitors to tic 1ulgo o. This Court Tho roun-
~ tos tho eity wy ssn: FOR. nnI u response 70
tas mega Q. ihe Comst ~ At,Hant r.; M a
.i... .su - .s..s ~.
rr.ssnce. No s"g 3entfo va ns.e is tho Court had
tot 1a!saleson o. mo s!ecs-taasei 81 tno o!!! os
tilat lhc issuance o. t9e i1uncton would 10
1-a,, Assem- rs ar .,
ant IRON Us onas*loh 10 lnhke oo tlnn tueSo e1n 70
IN question 81 the stFtns: whatever nliundosstand-
ins 'oels asy " - 10 ~ ectna @ asset. ano
"'n co ocg appa. 70 me-. 1a. n.
'the she hstlshhF corporation Gohhsri hot ahy ore
.lae nass 1ns 70 et*nihs the p!.! on .no usnaa of
shs e1s, tne court aIon ~ Own sueeeauon aneMheu
70 snsss ths uau1i orde' .1 ios na.. GFennins.J
INJUNCTION: oatr 10 HeH lnereoi, ehteiea ~ oruef
no remain III iono 1M tta haSe: subject IN Ihs
Mah's'e !" nEntto no'e toI ~ catthrnt t W a.s
i 1n a. = ~ :" ~, e nJtas ao1 y" LIE 14'' VI s'@1o |"f
w. Va Wv sase @ 9 aaJ .. ,,
TMk roiLow1So !S's ,,.,, or;s,oN S u,S,...,
| MA 1urnianea ~ lhe sEA!nf arat' his fsluss:
CRY L*w l2: nsr.nrnsHr. cn'c."o Alr! @;-Io ne
| uon q. u. tets''. AaEof q Ia lHy q th'faav-
ata ~ reply TO your inquiry. Cah ~ common
cothcu awjtly proceed 10 CANVAS tns returns os kae
ntection hsll ~ sAid city on Tue !d ast aha record
tho ftt VI eaid eahFas4 TIE memoirs .! sa1o Goun-
| eli having osen fhlotatI IRON '? an1ha ~ ~
| order Of tAs Circuit COURT of CooK county!
| answer laas 4Io INJUNCTION o!ucF stloHaa %
str1ct3 fbeJed the question "HctEer 4Hc1 Injunction
was TRht!ul1y r wrcugsHly granted Is ono not to bs
dctcrm!ed by tho parties ch1nned but " tht Court
on proper nearing EaWaetHeT r!h1U1ly or wrong