New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-01-21
A pRECISIAN CORRECTED.

Mr.. Morris-Now, if that is to be read, | ask that
IT read the original senoaphic notes because they
are incorrectly printed aud that not the only ncorrecton
Judge Nelson Errors will creep into the presS where they
are
Mr. Morris-There is one in this case
Mr. Eyars-Does anybody say there is an error here'
Mr. Morris-Yes, Sir, | do; in the printing Of It,
Mr. Evsrts-Wel. where is your proof OF III
Mr. Morris-Wel, do say 80.
MI Eysrts- Show Us the proof
Mr. Norris- call then for the original senographc notes
The stenoapher called my attention to it himself and saw
that il was incorrect and he said that the mistake had been
made in the The Office that his manuscript was cor
rect and the production OF The will show that that was
| Incorrectly printed.
Mr. Eyarts-It i, certainly quite competent for counsel on
either side 10 appeal original stenOgraphc notes
Judge NesouThs correction one that can be made in the
| redirect examination.
Mr. Byarts-Or the staaosrspher can he produced
Mr. Monis-ut object TO their assuming that the printer
/. correct in reference to this testimony OF the witness because
| II is not
Mr. Tracy-we is very clear he made the mistake
now
! say there is an incorrect report in THE TRIBUNE
Oh that point Now wish to say, Sir, this subject
has suggested now, that at the commencement Of
this trial was named by Of the the other
side that the report Of The TRIBUNE should be adopted the
official report OF the trial. and see that TnE TRIBUNE stem.
Judge NeisonThe one who is assisting The TRIBUNE
seuogaphers the official stenogapher Of this Court and
now acting far as he can 10 connection with them.
Mr. Beach-Yes Sir certainly intended to make rehec-
ton upon them Sir their accuracy But wish TO state this
TO your Honor reporters whether the Official
the oa stenoeapheF have mentioned TO the counsel for the
nlaIptf that there are several inaccuracies in The
TRIBUNE report Of the testimony Aud 1t is through
that representation made by the stenosaphers that
have raised the question which is now presented to
your Honor; aud l contnue observations upon 1t for
another purpose 1t seems Sir upon both sides the report In
Tas TRIBUNE adopted the official report Of the pro-
ceedngs upon this trial When find that the report In The
TRIBUNE in matters which deem essential TO true repre-
senson OF this trial. varies from the stenogphers notes;
and that is brought TO our attention By the ocl
,enographer, wish 10 enter protest 10 your Honor
against accepting The TRIBUNE report as the oiciil
repor of This trial that we may under any mlsappee.
sion Afterwards And may be permitted TO say, Sir, in add
ton that having studied With the report OF the trial
as has appeared in The TRIBUNE knowing that had been
designated this way by mutual consent the official report
OF this trial have been very much dissatisfied by the fact that
prefix the report OF the trial in THE TR
which unfair and unjust towards the plaintiff and which
make think false differences and false statements regard
the course OF the trial Your Honor will observe TO every
report OF the evidence in this THE TRIBUNE there 10 pre-
fixed sort Of summary syllabus giving representations in
regard to the object Of counsel the results accomplished
by counsel, and representations in regard 10 the
character evidence and the effect OF the evidence
whether preJudcs side the other am unwilling
Sir that these should be presented In what 10
cepied ocia report OF the trial. and attached the
statement OF the evidence. incorrect in many Of is pscu
| lars
Judge NesonThst forms part Of the report Of the case
OF couree.
MI Beach-No Sir; but your Honor requested with great
popnety and supposed that the courtesy at least OF the
ocla paper reporting this trial would accede 10 that request
that the report should not be accompanied By editorial
ents and II Sir insist that hey shall be at partial
and not aud poisoned by The oTeudee y The editorial
d;ps .asa! u TIA. os'nF>