Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1875-09-03

fnfOIIu6u IILldlIClOl0 tnSe duH0ilct
will be made to secure depositors
against loss whether resumption takes
place or not. On the whole. affairs
seem to he looking we'll and the best OF
feeling prevails in monetary and COM
mercial circles.
The election Yesterday passed off
very quietly throughout the State.
Returns from the country at present
are very meager, and from the city
scarcely anything is to be- obtained OF
a reliable nature, but enough is known
10 clearly indicate that Irwin and the
entire Democratict ticket is elected,
probably by a handsome majority.
Present advices give Irwin, 4,92S;
Phelps, 3, ST.; Bidwell, 2,l4S. In the
precincts in which the count is COM
pleted the estimated standing OF the
candidates in the counties and pre-
cincts where the count is incomplete. 1t
is supposed, will not greatly modify the
above proportion.
1t is generally conceded that Lut-
trelI has defeated his opponents tor
Congress in the Third district.
In the Second district the fight be-
tween Page and Larkin is close, Tut
tie running far behind.
In the Fourth district Houghton Is
ahead at present .advices, with which
it is believed he has a good show OF
winning. His su, porters are disap-
pointed in the present indications from
Santa Clara, but he is running strong
in the southern counties n much
better than was expected In Los An
geles.
1t is pretty much guesswork to spec
Mate on the Congressional vote in this
district, but the general impression
seems to be that Piper is ahead and
Swift badly beaten.
In the San Francisco municipal cleo
ton Clayton is generally credited with
a majority for Mayor; Bryant is prob
ably next.
The Independents feel hopeful Of a
good showing on city officers. Cen
orally Ellis, Ind, for Chief Of Police,
is thought to have beaten Crowley.
some Further Returns from h
California Election.
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 2.
The returns on the Congressional
election in the Second District show
the following results as far as the
count il completed:
In Alameda county the vote stands:
Page, so; futile, 20; Larkin so. This
includes two precincts in Oakland, but
nothing else from the principal towns.
Amador County: Page, l52; futile,
81; Larkin, l75.
Calaveras county: Page l07; futile,
10; Larkin, GA.
Contra Costa county: Page, 254;
futile, 26; Larkin, l3l.
FL Dorado county: Page, 377; Tut
tie, 100; Larkin, 420.
Nevada county: Page, 1874; futile,
500; Larkin. Isl.
Placer county: Page, 377; futile,
203; Larkin. 2iS.
Sacramento, outside of the city,
from which nothing definite il yet
known: Page, II; futile, 70: Laikin,
II.
Tuolumne county: Page, l24; Tut
tie 81; Larkin. 43.
San joaquin, outside OF Stockholm:
Page, Isl; futile, %; Larkin, ITO.
Congressional returns from all the
large towns, are very meager, in most
cases none being yet given. In the
Third District, Lake county, gives De-
MO, Rep, 40; Luttrell, DEM, SO; Reed,
Ind, q.
Marin county: DEMO, lo5; Luttrell.
81; Reed, 60.
Plu.nas county: DEMO, SO; Luttrell,
IS; Reed. 80.
Sierra county: DEMO, FOL; Luttreii,
226; Reed. 106.
S~iskiyou county: DEMO, l05; Lut-
trell. l49; Reed. none.
Solsno, including u precinct In
Nallejo: DEMO, POS; Luttrell, 30i;
Reed, II.
Sonoma county: DEMO, 25l; Lut-
trell. 457; Reed, i5S.
Tehama county: DOnio. 1873; Luttrell,
1872; Reed. 3S.
Trinity county: DEMO, 80; Luttrell,
20; Reed, none.
Y9Io county: DEMO. /; Luttrell,
Yuba county: DEMO, IS; Lutrell,
As; Reed. 5.
In the Fourth District, Los Angeles
gives Houghton, Rep, 1862: Wigginton,
DEM. l45; Thompson, Ind, %.
In MERGED county Wigginton has ll5
majority.
Monterey: Houghton. ia; Wig.
CLINTON. 1873; Thompson. CO.
San Luis Obispo county: Houchton,
so; Wigginton, 1870; Thompson, IL.
San Mateo county: Houghton, 80;
Wigginton, 1872; Thompson, 63;
Santa Barbara county:Houghton, 81:
Wigginton, 40; Thompson, o.
Santa Clara county: Houghton, i43;
Wigginton, 335; Thompson, 92.
Stanislaus county: Houghton, 33l;
Wigginton, III; Thompson. II.
Tulare county: Houghton, 20; Wig
CLINTON. ~; Thompson, 20.
San Diego county: Houghton $40;
Wigginton, 1875; Thompson, 30.
Santa Cruz county: Houghton, 356;
Wigginton, 2e7; Thompson, Dos.
In the First District the returns are
very meager, but Piper is probably
elected. The present talk is that the
contest for Mayor IL close between
Clayton and Bryant with the chances in
favor of the latter.
SANTA BARBARA, Sept. 2.
This county has gone Democratic,
but full returns are not yet in.
MARYsvILLE, Sept. 3.
Eleven precincts in Yuba county
give Phelps, SIS; Irwin, III; Bidwell,
536. LuttreIl will have a large plural
ity in the county. Bradley, Indepen-
dent for the Assembly, is probably