, 1875-06-12
BEECHER.
Mr.. Beach Continues to Make
It Interesting for Ali
Parties.
L Crtnnfng Beechortte on the jury
Gets a Wel].Dcserved
Rebuke.
Porter, Having Put in His Oar,
Wishes He Hadn't.
Beaeh's Indignation and Eloquones Eroke
Bursts Of Applause.
Frank Carpenter, the Artist, Paints a
Strong Picture Of Perjury.
He Publishes n Statement Contra
dieting Host of Bcecher's
Witnesses.
DR.. 8tor1s Knew All tho Time that tho
Charge Was Adultery.
Frank Carpenter, the Artist, Paints a
Strong Picture Of Perjury.
He Publishes n Statement Contra-
dieting q Host of Bcecher's
Witnesses,
Dr.. atorIs Knew All tho Time that tho
Charge Was Adultery.

4EACH'S THIRD DAY,
EXCITING fScFDENTu-


EXCITING INCIDENTS.
SPECIAL Dfsratch to Ths Chicago Tribune.
NEW YORK.. Juno 11.-Mortont of Indiana;
Chief Jussico Church. Of Now York, and OK Gov,
Parkos, Of Now JerBey, wcro Ia tho audonce
Which to-day. as previously, app1auded Beach TO-
peatodly and loudly. Tho Plymouth delegation
has boon dnttnct portion Of tho audience ever
since tho tzial began, but only sinco Beach
opened his argument has tllcro boon distinct.
lively Tilton patty. Once during his address,
Beach. tn Boycre and earnest touee. addressed
the Jury, seemingly intending tho larger
part Of bis remarks to apply to lilo
foreman. Carpenter, IN torms Of reproaot, bo-
cause ho Lad perceived what 10 considered M
incroduoua smile On tho lira OF one or moro OF
them at aomo statement. 1Is also assorted his
cIasm on tho respect and attention Of tho Jury,
Thoso remarks of Beach to tho Jury, considered
In connection With previous remarks, aud The
current reports that tho Jury Las boon 3" "t11ed."
cause much speculation. A Aerco quarrel be.
tween Beach aud Porter also cauacd great az
ci.emnut.
TTo THE dssottdftd T4rssl
ANOTHER GREAT cnOwp,
NEW YORK, Juno 11.-Aghiu to-day tho Brook
I'm lily Courtroom IL crowded, anu ALMOST Quo.
hall of thoao present wore women. aIf. Dcach, on
e4toElng. Was sgain greotod with round OF ap-
plauae.
Mr.. Beach said. 4 large amount Of iodiRns-
tion hhs been expended upon Mir. Monton for lis
alleged dishonorablo conduct in not burning tho
documents ID tlis case, after tho lsowen arbitra-
tiun Which, It 10 alleged. contemplated this ac-
ton. Ho cal'od attention to the testimony OF
Mr. stosrst tbas Mr. Moulron said NIr. Dcccher
thought he had hurped all those papers, but that
ban Wilkoson was mistaken it ho thought ho
hsd, and II they woEo burned Alf. Tilton
would hare no protection. Thero mas 10
insmaor in thts conversation that tic request to
burn the lcttera hroeo from the arbitration, but
1t came from Sam Wilkoson nfter Tho tril,n1tlto
agrcotnout, with which lo was Intimately cou.
Doot#d.
Mt. Beach read
TIE LETTER or AroLoor.
Thls showed that tho burning ol all tho papsts
Hhs not requested, and thRt the destruction OF
none Of thom waa contemplated BY tho arbi.ra-
nntlhted, a tho friend Of both parties. What
hnd this 1aatter, any way, to do with tho exam-
ination Of this caee7 All through, tho lofenuo
have gone into side issues to distract attoutiou
the trouble botwoen Deechor and Tilton formed
part Of tho sublect.mattor Of the Bowen a, b..
TRITON, Was ono Of tho most extraordinary which
bad been nut forth III thta case. There waH
4 uua1AEss 'ulrxlouL1r BETWEEN 71LroS AND
BOWEN.
Thoro WAS written submission Of this diff
Guilty. 11lsou aul Dowen appeared bsfors the
arbitration. Tho decision MAS gi;on. Tic
money "as paid. Where was Mr.. Deccher, il
10 was involved in tLs arbilrstion7 Why
All tho testimony WAS to the effoct that
nothing was discussed before the arbttrators OK
oers tho buBincss dlcultios wlt!, lsowon. Tlcas
arblsrators wose nembcrH Of Plymouth Church
l4koly thae this auggeation ~ to burning this pa-
pors may hayo notn tnado by them. After tho
AWard Was thcEo anything 10 mak0 tho aug9os-
tion OF tho ArbitratorB blnding3 II there was,
+rt,r - t$.SAh kA&t AhKu fII.k
whole plea haa becn gotten up to s!ausler snd
throw d!HcTod!t upon tue nsan who wsa then tho
TRUSTED REPOSITORY or ALI or DEEcuEuS LET
TENS,
aud friend whom Deecher regarded ~ raised up
for lin by tho special pEoyidouco OF God. When
tue papers III the caao WeIa destroyed, tAnEe waH
c!htnosouB oatcsy and ~hen they Wero rru-
served there wcro ferocious complaints. II tLoso
paposs weso 30 trivial ~ tho defense a.
sE ss did As dsssa.s OF oompa sasn'tSs ,Ss
t!,oy wore kopt7 What was tie trouble?
It these lettera furnished Al wAs Aasertad, in-
teEnA! evidence of Mr.. Deeoher's Innocence aud
secured tia scau%.;tsl, % Wy. then the geatlem.9
tl,nuk tho plaintiff for their psoscryaton.
(l.auEhtor aud appiauso.] Tho truth Was TINT
t4eEo letter.
HAD 4 DREAD sios1F1cAscE,
which gave tho defenBo tie strongest reason to
wish that they had boon destroyed. IA 10 why
ho Wan not callod "a Witness Frank CARPENTER
confirmed tho statement made by Mr. Beach yes-
terday. 10 hF. 1ceoter's SsAtonlaut that hs tirst
Carpenter says 10 painted usechcE.s portrait III
1858, md says tue fact il Attestod by notice Of
tho picture published In tho New York Epcai,y
d.a,,o Pot Of o9t; h.s as' s as's la 5or!y to tue
c.psator 's s,s s0a Inv t'i ss TT nti
NATION Of wrong came from . lady intimate
in tho Ti!ton family, now dead, during q
visit H!e 1natlo to nv stu1io early iu 1871, 5nHt