The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-05-29
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBEBS.
BY Judge Lawrence.

DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBERs
BY Judge Lawrence.
Morris vs.. Morris-In the matter OF Sawyer
Webb executor %e VS. iep We9S; Morangs oS vs.;
granted. ,,.s = 60. :.
Same Alden VS. Hoagland; Tucker vs.. 'Livings-
ton Same vs.. same Same VS.. same; Same ys.
same; Same VS.. Same; Hatton VS.. Campbell;
Dougherty Va. cary; Carr vs.. Gibbs; Mare vs..
Vedder; Stone VS.. Bell; Freestone vs.. Bottsteln;
In the matter OF Cooper; Brown VS.. Storer; Har-
den VS.. Corbstt; Jessup vs. Bagnett Knoll vs..
Bosworth; Creep VS.. Jacoby; O0ckroft &C., vs.
SAME; Clark VS.. Mccormick; Erwin Vs. White
In the matter OF La Farge.-Granted.
Alden vs. Hoagl and.-Memorandum for counsel.
Trulee vs.. Alden.-MotIon TO vaoate attachment
Is denied with COSTS. Hecker VS.. MITCHELL
Courtney vs. New York, west shore ana
Chicago Railroad Conpany.-0rder appointing re-
Cushier VS.. Kohlhonr-I require the written con-
sent OF the Attorney General or mis- representative
to the appointment OF the receiver
Macgregor VS.. Mscgregor. OF referee
confirmed and Judgment OF divorce granted TO the
piaina WIN CUSTODY 81 child; "a srr
but rule eignt preclndes them from executing the
bond presented.
SUPREME CoUBT-aENERAL TERM.
BY Judges Davis, Brady ana Daniels.
Fallcn vs. The Mayor &c.-Motlon for new trial
granted, costs 10 aDido event. OPINION by judges
DAVIS and Brady.
Davis aud Brady.
Phillips va Walker-order modified as directed
In the opinion, without costs OF appeal. Opinion
by Judge Davis.
Moore vs.. The Mayor, &c.-Motion for new trial
Daniels
~laoe VS.. cheesbrough. appealed from
affirmed, with $40 costs, beside disbursements 10.
Hanck VS. Craignead et al.-order appealed
from affirmed. without costs. Opinion by Judge
Daniels.
Iamberison vs.. Van Bostwick and another-or-
der affirmed, with $40 costs, beside disburse-
ments Opinion BY Judge Brady.
Comm vs.. The Chicago ana Northern Pacific Con-
So uction Company, impleaded, &c.-0rder re-
versed, with $40 costs, beside disbursements.
Opinion by Judge Daniels.
BY Judges Davis Daniels and Donohue.
The Germania Bank VS.. Distler implicated, &c
Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Judge Daniels.
BY Judges Davis, Daniels and Brady.
Gopsill vs. Decker.-0rder affirmed, with $40
costs, beside disbursements. Opinion BIZ Judge
Brady.
Conn vs.. Coke ct aI.-order appealed from al
Opinion by Judge Davis.
The Christopher and Tenth Street Railroad
Company vs.. The Central Cross Town Railroad
Company. Order appealed from reversed, with
$40 costs beside disbursements, and motion de.
MED, with SO costs OF opposing same Opinion
the United states vs. Graf ct al.-Order ap-
pealed nom BY defendant Gran. and order APP
out costs to either party. Opinion BY Judge
DAM Is.
Gilman, Executor. &c, VS.. RedIngton.- order
modified as directed By the opinion, without costs
OF appeal to either party. Order TO be Sc tiled h,
Judge Brady. 0 inion by Judge Brady.
Manton VS.. Poole ct al.-0rder reversed, with
$40 costs beside disbursements, and motion
granted with $40 costs. Opinion by Judge
Dnsmore ct al vs. The Mayor &c.-order re-
yersed, with $40 costs beside disbursements.
smith vs.. The Mayor, &c.-Order af1rmed, with
costs. and with leave 10 defendants TO answer,
on payment OF COSTS. Opinion by Judge Davis.
Pacific Mail steamship Company vs. Irwin
Order affirmed, with $40 costs beside disourse-
ments. Oplnlon BY Judge Brady.
Wheeler VS.. See.-Judgnent reversed and new
trial ordered, with costs 70 abide event. opinion
Bergh ct al. vs.. Busted ct al-Order appealed
from affirmed In part and reversed In part, with
out costs 10 either party. Opinion by Judge
Bronson vs.. Dlmock.-order af1lrmed, with
costs, with usual leave TO amend on payment OF
costs. Opinion by Judge DAVIS.
sweet VS. 1ltus.-Juugment aflrmed. opinion
Demarest ct al. vs.. wIckham, Mayor, &C.
Judgment amrmed, with costs. Opinion W Judge
Daniels.
Merchant ct al. vs.. BeldIng.-Judgment az
lrmed. opinion by Judge Daniels.
Tine People ex rel Hogan ct al. VS.. Flynn.-Mo-
ton Tor new trial granted, with costs TO abide
event. Opinion By Judge Brady, Judge DAVIS dis
Kensorthy vs. Phyfe ct aL-order anrmed,
win $40 costs beside disbursements. Opinion
Virgins vs. The People.-Judgment reversed
aud new trial ordered. Opinion by Judge Daniels.
The People ex rel. Lewis ct al. vs. J. I. DAILY,
Judge, &c.-Proceedings reversed, with costs.
Opinion by Judge DOnohue,
The Excelsior Petroleum Company vs.. Fancher
CT al.-Aotion for reargument Denied with $40
costs.
same vs. McChesney ct al.-Motion for rearRu-
ment denied, without costs.
by Judges DAVIS. Daniels and Lawrence.
RusK, &c, vs.. souter, executor, &c.-Motion for
by Judges Lawrence and Daniels.
Dederick &c al. vs.. McAlIister.-Judgment ar
nrmed. Opinion by Judge Davis
by Judges Brady, Daniels and Westbrook.
The Mayor. SC, W. Genet-order appealed
ments. opinion BY Judge wesibrook
Pearce, Sur. &C, VS. Chapman, impleaded &c
mistiBR the Items o. the account c1amea oI the
pialntG, order appealed from reversed and order
directed DENYING the motion for reference, with
SO COSTS OF the motion, and also or the appeal to-
gether with DISBURSEMENTS thereon, TO abide The
event OF the action.
Crofut vs. Henry, Stin &c.-0rder af1rmsd,
with $40 costs, besides disbursements. Opinion
by Judge Daniels, Judge DAVIS concurrIng.
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPKcIAL TKRM
BY Judge Van Worst
Van Volkenberg vs.. Sinclalre ct al-Motion
McPhsrson vs. sInclaire ct aL-Motion granted.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Loew.
Importers and Traders National Bank vs.. an
thony.-Motion to punish FOR contempt denied.
Hatch VS.. CnurchlIl.-Let counsel for the respec.
tive parties appear before me at such time as tney
may agree on. tMemorandum.l
COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS.
Before Judge Sutherland.
DUFFY CONVICTED.
Yesterday the trial or James A Duty, indicted
for attempting to shoot Deputy Comptroller
Earle, which has occupied the attention or the
Court for several days, was concluded. Judge
sutherland delivered a carefully prepared charge
In which the law relative to mental responsibility
Tor criminal acts was clearly and ably stated. the