The Cincinnati daily star. [volume] ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) 1875-1880, 1875-10-07

In the District Court yesterday petit
tion in error was submitted by w. D..
Chapman and the l., q. 81. Railroad
Company against M. L. CLARK, to re-
verse a judgment in favor of Clark rem
dered in the Common Pleas Court. The
suit grew out OF shipment of oats made
by the defendant. The case was argued
and held under advisement.
A motion to dissolve an attac hment
made in suit by Munger q Co. again t
Ahlers & Binder, In the Court below,
was sustained, and yesterday the case
was taken in the District Court for a re-
versal OF the Judgment. Case argued
and submitted.
In the superior Court yesterday Mr..
Maury asked FOR a reversal of Judgment
in case against Kirk e. Cheeyer. The
original action was for damages result.
Ing in the breach of contract of $l3 900
u. d M. h. II. income bonds, and a judg-
iment was rendered in the Court below
for Kirk y Cheever. Case submitted.
SUPREME COURT.
General Docket-No. 81. Joseph Guen-
kemeyer vs.. The state of Ohio. Judg-
ment reversed.
No. 50. Elizabeth Westerman, j ohm f.
'ONeal and Joseph O'Neal VS.. Henry
Westerman. Judgment affirmed.
No. 6S. Cornelius Sullivan VS.. the
Pittsburg, Ft. Wayne aud Chicago Rail
road Company. Judgment reversed and
cause remanded.
No. II. Board of Education of the vii
lage OF Hanging kock and Dh ectors
OF district No. l, Hamilton town.
Lay "A
OF Education OF Decatur township, Law
renee county, OHIO. Passed, no service
OF summons having been made.
No. ~. Ohio ex rel. Attorney General
VS.. the Cleveland and Mahoning Rail-
road Company. Gao WaYanto. Passed
for briefs.
No. 7S. Geo. Barclay aud others VS..
the State OF Ohio. tsa 7t
Stricken from the docket for the rea-
son that no writ Of error had been
issued.
No. 70. James M. Anderson VS.. John
S. Brasee and others. Error to the Dis
trict Court oi Fairfield county.
Continued, process not having been
served.
Motion Docket--George III. Blackburn
VS.. The State OF 0nio. Motion for writ
of error refused.
No. 2SS James Smith and others vs..
Joseph Potter, guardian, &c. Motion to
take Cause No. 6OS, Geuerd Docket, out
OF its order oyerruied.
NO. 200. Betsy j. Burns vs.. Isaac N,
Sheets and otDers. Leave 10 file petit
ton in error refused.
No. 29l. Tue Union Central Life Insur
ance Company OF Cincinnati VS.. b, and
c. Poeltker. Leave to file a petition in
error granted.
No. 295. Oliver Day vs.. The State of
Ohio. Motion Tor the allowance of writ
ot error oyerruled.
No. 297. buddy, Kercheyal and others
rs. Percival b. Upuegraff and others.
No. 20S. Samuel A. Mackey We. John
B. Wright.
No. SSO Barber 6 Stout VS.. percival
u. Updegraf and others.
No. 5el. John House vs. Angeiine
House. |
No. 302. William M. Beal VS.. Wash
ngton Y. Coulter. .,..
lu all these cases leave to Tile petit |
ion in error was refused.
No. 3O4. Joseph A. Treat VS.. Bradford
W. Skinner. Motion for leave to file a |
petition in error passed for record and |
plaintiffs brief.
No. $40. The State o. Ohio ex rel. CITY
Il Cincinnati vs.. Joseph b. Humphreys. |
Auditor Of Hamilton county. Motion
or perempt0ry writ OF mandamus. AL |
ernatiye writ ordered, to be served |
orthwith and answered on or before the |
9th day Of October, inst.
No. 822. j. Reynolds & Co. VS.. George |
}. Thornhill. Motion for leave to file |
'etiIi0n in error. Leave to defendant to |
lie briet within one week.
No. 323. Sarzuel FoUambe and others
.. w. Il. Beaumont and others. Leave |
hle Q petition in error refused.
No. 324. John Reed VS.. Mary j. Dill
ara. Leave to file petition In error |
efused. =
The petition fled by T. D. French.
through his attorney, Thos. A. Logan. to /
estrain the production of "Our Boysn
t the Grand, came up for hearing in the
]. s. Court yesterday. The particulars
{. the case were mentioned in the
TAR, a few days ago. After a good 7
cal of discussion by the attorneys on
9th sides, ten days were given the /
laintiff In which TO file all new affida.
its, and like term was granted to the i
efendants.