The New Orleans bulletin. [volume] (New Orleans [La.]) 1874-1876, 1875-05-27
THE COURTS.
Supreme Court.

Supreme Court.
REHEARINas REFUSED.
State ex rel. Edward Lube VS.. Administra
tor Of Finance
Miss a. H. Todd vs. John O'Rourke.
! Hall, Washburne l. Co. vs.. E. n. Iven
& Co.
F. Formento vs.. J. N. Robert.
E. Newman ct al. va. John Eaton ane
wife.
New Orleans Canal and Banking Compan..
vs. City of New Orleans.
City of New Orleans vs. City Hotel.
George D. Pritchett vs. Mechanics ant
Traders Insurance Company.
State ex rel. A. p Field and J. j. Hayes vs.
the City of New Orleans.
| Sam Chopin vs.. James Wilson.
| Mrs E. Leblanc va. succession OF Chas
Massieu.
Geo. Wilkinson ct al. vs.. Joseph Dalferel
ct al.
Lazare S. Rodriguez VS.. Mathilde johnson
his wife.
A. Cheval ct al. vs.. Gadanne Casanave.
In the matter Of the estate of Johr
Brown.
J. G. Hester vs.. Carrollton Insurance Com.
pany ct al
Nicholas Schmidt VS.. Joseph Raw ct al.
Succession of Domitilde Hebert.
r L Theard vs.. VIM. BogeL
E izabeth Marchal vs. Harriet Hooker.
Laurent Julien vs. steamboat Wade Hamp.
ton.
Virginia G. Burke Vs. Claressa Bishop ct al.
Randolph, Singleton & Brown VS.. Joseph
w. Carroll
Parish of West Baton Rouge VS.. Robert
Morris.
James Il. Lynch VS.. Ellen Kennedy and
husband.
Morgan Morgans Vs. Parish of St. Charles.
Arthur Robbins vs.. Parish of st. Charles.
Letitia Darlington vs.. Parish of s.. Charles
Gustar Grunstrom vs.. Lawrence Zoller.
Patrick Halpin VS.. John L. Baringer.
Frank F. Case vs. b. w. Kloppenberg.
Same vs.. William Schneider.
O. J. Flagg vs.. Parish of St. Charles.
L. de Poret vs.. A. L Gusman.
j. w. Banning vs.. r. Bleakeley & Co.
]. T. Cross VS.. Mrs. G. G. Southmayd.
Eugene Rochereau & Co. vs.. Octave
Colomb; w. H. Vredenburg vs.. Mrs. E.
Brooks; r. N. Lewis vs.. J. B. Letorey; d. Il
J. D. Edwards vs.. Fairbanks & Gilman; L.
Cavaroc q Son vs. w. P. Harper ct al.
Citizens Bank VS.. St. Louis Hotel.
A. Roos & Co. VS.. Merchants Mutual In
surance Company.
New Orleans, Mobile and Chattanooga Rail-
Schmidt 4 Ziegler vs.. Louise B. Willister.
Charles Graham vs.. George Cronan ct al.
Charles F. Perry vs.. DR.. G. Beard.
REHEARINGs GRANTED.
Succession Of Walter o. VIM. John L.
Lewis ct ais. vs. w. J. Behan and John
Thorn.
J. B. Henry, ST., VS.. Mayer Goldman.
United States Circuit Court.
In the case of L. L. Conrad vs.. Rufus
NAPLES, the jury, after able and exhaustive
arguments, rendered a verdict for the defend
ant.
G. w. Swanton was arraigned, pleaded not
guilty, waived trial by jury, and was put
on trial, and was sentenced to four months in
the Parish Prison. He was charged with
beating some seamen on the ship North
ampton.
Frank M Ames u.s. Neu Orleans, Mobile and
Ieras Railroad Judge Woods this morning
said In this case the inquiry submitted is
whether the trustee appointed by the court is
competent to entertain proposition for
purchase of the property from him, and
whether particular plan Of sale is within his
authority or not.
"The report Of the master in chancery is
conclusive that it is to the interest of all that
such sale should be made as early as practi-
cable to an association, able and willing to
construct the road. A company of bond
holders able to build the road and who use
10 pay for it, would be such dispo-
sition as is agreeable to equity.
"But no interest can be sacrificed; each
bond holder is entitled to demand his share
in money or in the property. The masters
report shows the value Of the property to be
$4,000 The trustee in any sale he may
make should b. prepared to make settle
ment for this cash price of the property with
the bond holders, or if he elected SO to take
it then to give his snare in stock.
"Time should be given to bond holders to
make their election, and the trustee should
have the sanction OF three-ffths Of the bond
holders to the sale. The Court declines to
discuss the plans submitted"