, 1875-04-08
THE PRESS.
t An ALIlI WILL. NOT ASaWEn,


We al! Of Us romembee tile great faith which Mr.
Noer tho chler, had In ths vtstuo Of an s1ihi, Whu
indeed foEGets hs touching exclamation tho dofoat.
cd Mr.rcwck roseB from Ito courtroom In company
With his faithful attendant Oh samlvoi W wosn't
thcre hholi n We foar, from certain Indications
That some Of Mr. BsechePa advisers have almost ~
much confidence In abt for hin, u Mr Weller hn.l
IN ono for Mr. rlrkwtek. Now. IN truth, tho plea,
avon II tho fact wcso we'll established, would hayo
aoont a. much ya!ue In It would hays had
in tho oshcr. Wo ara moi speaking Of ita salua horc
tho jury. wLo u lrng in verdict accord.
lug 10 tho law au tho eydcuce But tAe ieax important
verdict 10 Mr. peccles will ho that xlich i1ey will
bring IN. For Tiers aro two trials going ROW. Ono
H. whether Theodore T!.on haa received auch wro.la
aud Injury from Henry Ward Neecher, la Atu sacred
family rclaio.M and by tho destruction OF hs pracs-
lc&s martial happiness, that he, the said Deecrr sa1
Iay to him, The Raid TIlson, tho s,sm Of 800 by
way OF seraEation. but this, although Il touches
Roody su,n Of mpnoy, Il comparatively snalt mat
scE. Tho rea question u wheshor u tho cala julg-
mcnt OF an unprc1udiced and impartial world, the
great preacher bus fallen .nso grave error with the
vito Of s frteu and has siucs bcen led Into course
OF conduct which biactana that dark but no. hunan
AIN, or whether he has bcou male the victim Of do
aberata conspIraey-a conspiracy which, II 1t Ill!
sna was orc Of ths most daring sud Ingenious, ~
Tls question, eaunot ~ tried upoa technieall,les
poFaas dcscrerancles Of fuct In Tho eyicnee
either tlde Now there = rsaHon 10 bsoyo llAt Mr.
eechcr4 advisors are inclined fcst s1cir defense
FsFT nnch npon arguments founded Nron evidence Of
thas SORT There IL sAIl to Ia expectation Ut 9rp4t
ro!nt IN fAsor Of r ucorher, " showing That, he
was eAcM'oro on the ~ day of June, lH7J la gould
nat aaya been with Mis-. s1onlton that day, WHOM
nMs tetsided that he n.se cesta!u confessions 10 her
co'trse, y clear enough. II Ag. usecher wtra
q tes9ski Of u tho otnca Of tho thrstIla Enion al
nat Tue Interview alleged net lave takrn
ace Int - far as tho puhile judytnunt Roe tli4 IL
comparatively Rinali tlater Thu sIt*tahco Of that
sLegaon. tho grasuman Of that ssisucc not that
~ happencd OF thu ~ Of tuAs but That Ill.,
1eeohsf mado 4e1At that tins certain admissions ta
IT. A0nsou, Now, He all know that mistake in
aata ~ easiest u al mistakes to mass, sln suc!l
nAako doeA not 1t u, iayalld4c, t tho geueral jul9
msas ths teasiinony of IN otherwise truthful ssonng
Wlthass who mAle4 H. In csscs Of murder sohlery,
Maanlt, assou. aud tho like, the date IL liked. IL III
aosooe factor % 1ha rrut!sn. We know that ssauch
~ a9lf, or Within very faw hour, thu mna way
aaISa. me FuhbtEy committed, tha LosSs artd- In
.4sa c.scs 10 ahow eatitfsctor1y that man charged
wa y tha ette was IN smother rl.cs slia thAn that
~ which was committed, At tho tna within which u
MMs: NV ass .eeu committed, II ssa.csnt cfsuas.
no! tan locs not spply iu common ssuss, however 1t
naf ~ law. 10 sn Interview with wouaA which hsr-
ftas4 nearly two ynlTs ago. For the stsoiufe
ta ttseaos r. NE pFou!cm u wanting II Is quite
no,1,.s st,Hsseie!9. Tor Instance, that Mr.. Mauton
eefisin esa |, iatarvlsw whirh abe slrges sl1e hnd
wa As Rescher. Or ~ 10 Tho substance oe what aha
saeSss taat ~ than said to 4cr-quis impossible,
HnAoat deliberate perjury her part. Hut nothing
=, H. poaaels than that she might mistake The dats
~ tst sutsi ts1 " sons dass-uoh1g, hardly, moss
Ptuu1pte tAAa thAs sha should DO 50, Aftcf auch
u utae esea With tbs lost effort of soccllsc