, 1875-03-27

catso ho had oLJu.ted 10 adjournment on st.
Patricia LAY, ,nolnborA propoasd to revongo
themselves hy defeating tno bIs! 70 nflnE fatf.
willing &lI1t they should do no. After tste whole
nfior1ioon lad locn consumed III cfrnrsn to
ane nd tito bill to death. In ortlcr to ascngs Mel
ro 4 insult tn Iretandspatron sant, tho bill was
otdurcd 10 third reading.
colLEcrIox Or TAXES.
III tho Senate. kel,oo's Tax-Chcctfon bltl Wan
tAk,t, up Of, t,1.l readng md passed.. 1t pro-
riIes tl,at. on an application for Judgment fof
ts1ea, It ei1al f,ot lie IlcceaHary for te officer
making tho application 70 snato affidavit to tho
delinquent, nor shall IL be necesaaty that Ills re-
turn to the County Court conla,r the valuation
Of tho rrogertv, but II shall he al''llcens That l,o
n,nko nh Official roturn aatfng In autataaco tint
tho list In ts regard BY l!u, presented ta a cor-
roct list Of tho lands md 1ots delinquent for taxos,
special taxos. aud npocinf assessments, for city
ptrr oseB. with tho aulo.lnt duo OH each tract
rot'rus % Of Tho city Collector ot such city duly
maIo to auch officer, uccpriing to law. II n}so
provides tlat no appeal s!lal! 10 nto~ed from
my Judgment Of tho County Court h3aihst any
property returned ns dei!A1noht under tho act'
except IN casoB Of arccinl assessments, unless
tile party appealing from Buol, Judgment blIal!
fist deposit with 6,ic general officer M amount
Of money eIuhl 10 the amount OF Judgment
shall also give boui witt, sccnrity, TO DO
approved by tito County Court, In MI amount to
bo fxcd by tho Court. wielin a tlmo to bo
limited by tho Court, conditioned that Eo viii
failure, wilt pay to said city al damages, inter
CIT, ntl costa, Which tho city may llavo sustained
i,y s11ch onucal, Unou tho atiIrmnnce OF said
Judgment ii, tho Supreme Court by d'smlasal Of
nllch appeal. OF by dismissal Of writ Of error
n,atlo, ! supossodoas, or ot!,orwlso. Judgment
sl,al 10 rendered III tho snpromo Court ngatnat
enM appellant for tho uHo Of tho city Tor
tl.a nosts III tho Supreme Court. md for fntorcase
on tho original amount OF auch judgment. and
for 10 por cent upou ancl, jnds1,snt a. damages;
and 10 writ Of error shall bo allowed to opefale
~ 1.porsedoas until tho party APPLYING tLotc-
for Alfal1 frat havo compiled il suihtanCo with
lilo conditions az above required in appellate DO
f,rorc ntcd by tho Judge Of Court allowing suc,
snporucdeao. II u,lch Judgment no stayed
py appeal cr s;lperseleau DO reversed
and not remanticd, then said o1lcor
l,nllug auch dopoai. sIialt restore tho
same to tho pArty making Bucll deposit.
in pnrt and reversed In part nnd not romanded,
tlcn sucl, oIlicor holding much deposit shall rst
nay cut Of such depoa.t tho amount ncceBsary to
satj1fy s,,ch Judgment III affirmed or modified by
tho ,;u,teu,D Court, together with all costs anu
Inherent, and d4maEes for which snctl dopoBitor
IL Liable by tho Bad affirmed or modified judy
lnent. and anN pay tho s,a'aneo, II AIRY. to nuch
H,lo for tho balance from tho Clerk of tho
Hnpromo go,,rt or OF tho County Count, "a tho
caso may require. II suc!l Judgment DO royora-
cd aud rcmandesl, tl,on sucl deposit Hlal await
tno nhal 1nnEMspt III tne Connks Houl'. anu y"
disposed OF by tho order Of said County Cpurs AZ
Justice may 1equre.
So,t1SsT,oys.
rh. f..o-,o. sn,tt -, ia fc1totvJnr ror,fnn
tas ~ H." o't,,nr,, T"a"t,o sswinn,
1!una uE"sset y! .a;e ~; t1ns' .n,, ~
plsol. Stalo board Of Education. Sunucl
W. Afoultop, Of Shelby County, roap-
poin.ea; i. 8. Cauhy, 1T ll,chland Coui,-
Y Z. Wy niar, ,f r,e1t ro,,... rno,rns,taJ
t4eoIeo y. Uiatt, " Luo Eoun.y' w ,vi
field y. Coy, torn expIrads j. U, knlckcr-
boekor Of Cook County, ylcc Jol1, Il. Foster.
r;ro william i'en 1lsrron. (;on,missonar Of
1miid,nr lin sonttarn nennv Aayj,n, i. N.
alulone. Irus'eo Of tho Ihattthtloh TOY tl!o
Ilind. Graham Loo, q Mercer rcappointemd' =
ahn, 5narao Wil1n,n n Rts;ner o'' t nrcasnt IN.
rnmbrnta'
o0sAA'o1'o' ,ox,,p.,.r,,v
toSrlt.tAlioS;:r
Ihc NOMINATIONS u Jhnfas NJ. Dsh1!eyt SOM