The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-05-20
ana se=isacso the prisoner TO she full term-two
years IN State Prison.
DECISIONS.
SUPREME COURT -cHAMBERs.
BY Judge Lawrence.

BY Judge Lawrence.
Feuchtwanger VS.. Lichtensten; Dexter vs.
Conner; Feucntwanger vs.. Lichtensteiui King
stone Bank vs.. BOYLE; Mon ell VS.. Nicnolson
Russell vs.. McLain; Hartz VS.. Rosentnal; Csurch
vs. lsaacs; Brown ". Pope; Hartman VS.. BucA-
ley, Jr Nlcnol VI. Siege; Mlchaelis W. Michaels
matter OF Powers; IN he matter OF the Floating
Heran VS.. Heran.-order granted.
Meartineau vs. La Forge.-I DO not and the
orner among the papers. -
CLARK in TINS case Is unver1ned, ana ne MOTION
cannot be decided until The omission Is suppned.
oyetlng vs.. Waite.-Motion granted 50 lar as 70
compel tile defendant 70 state the dates when tue
alleged services were rendered, Wherever huch
dates are omitted IN the Dill 81 particulars
served. In otaer respects tue mouoh = ueuleu'
No costs. -,
Levy v. Observation-Disclosures 20 change place OF
tr al Is Erie county is denied wltn costs.
Hartman Va Buckley Jr.-order for leave TO sue
on judgment Is granted .s.. -.
venue TO Rockland county is denied, with costs OF
m0hon
Purtans.-Tne motion being 10 yacate an order
heretofore made by Mr.. Justice DonOnue should
be heard before that Justice IL IS ordered accord
lngly
Tue Hanover &c. Bank VS. The Indianapolis,
&c, Railroad Company. defendants not nav
ing FLED the dess naIOn IN the Office OF Inc SecFe-
tary or STATE. required by the act Of 1850 chapter
270 ! think tnat the service upon The agent WHO
was within THIS state for a specific purpose was
sufficient. But a. / inier tnas the defendants de-
sire IN good faith 70 defend. shall open the ue,
fault on condition that the defendants appear ana
answer the complaint witnln ten days, pay $lo
costs u nouon ana accept snort notice Of trial Tor
June term. Judgment - stand a. ,sia':r,
Pierson VS.. MoTgan.-AfndaYltl II lnsunclenI.
Burdsall vs. The Merchants Life Insurance COM
panE-Explanatioh wanied =, u..,e..
SO as 10 allow tine plaintin TO tax his coss and
enter Judgment The default Is opened on paw
ment 81 costs before notice 81 TRIAL anu Siu costs
0: motion ana cause set down Tor May 20, 1919.
SUPERIOR coURr-sPEcAL TERM.
nv Judge Van Worst.
Hale VS.. Grlswod. Motion granted unless
plaintiff within five days delivers tue bill OF par
Hoch ct al vs. Halsey.-Judgment settling the
disposition OF the fund IN court.
NIreman VS.. Remington sewing Machine Com
pany.-5tay penuing appeal ordered. Notice OF
settlement Of oruer 10 be given 10 the otner SIDE.
The President, SC, OF Insurance. Company or
Nortn America vs.. Gardnef.-Under the decisions
OF this Court the adjustment OF costs Is correct.
but the introductory COSTS IN favor Of plalntlH
may he set on against DEFENDANTS costs IN the ac-
Wright vs. Fay.-Motion granted on pavmen. OF
$40 costs defendant TO have twenty days TO an
swer amended complaint.
Knapp vs.. Berghaus.-The defenoant must de-
liver 10 plaIntin IN i've days Dill OF particulars
OF ms counter clam.
Scrafford VS.. Scranord.-Appllcation must be
made IN special term.
b. Judge Curtis.
Dafragh vs.. Darragn.-kel erence ordered
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM
BY Judge ]. F. Dalv.
Brown vs.. Hoden.-Motion granted, with SO
costs, to abide event. See opinion.
Ru0Xel w. Ihe continental Lie insurance IOm-
panY.- Motion oenied. WITH $40 costs, 10 ABIDE
event. see opinion.
Bell vs.. aughes.-Motion granted. Cause set
down for FIRST Monday or June next. No costs.
krekeler VS.. Inaule.-M0uon granted. $40 costs,
10 abide Determination OF appeal. See OPINION.
Burke VS. Plnckney.-Motlon 10 dismiss appeal
Denied. Appellant may file ana serve additional
aliidavits within ten days. No costs. see OPINION.
The New YORK Insurance Company vs.. keyes
no. II same Sane NO . Reference ordered.
Young ". Decentralization denlsd $40 costs,
20 be pald as directed IN opinion.
plucnaru.-MOIlOu granted
mens VI 81 costs.
BY Chief Justice Daily.
Ia the matter OF Lawn ence A. Benson for
chance OF nama.-Appllcation granted. See
opinion.
BY Judge Larremore.
Atktns ct al. VS.. Bode.-Moton granted, with
SO o.ts TO ABIDE event.
Cumming vs.. Bailey ct al.-Judgment ordered
for delivery OF personal property.
HerZig ct al. vs.. The Etna Insurance Company;
same W. the London Assurance Company; Harrt-
son W. Garrett ct aL-Appncalons granted.
seaman vs. TnOmpsou.-MotlOn granted. order
10 plead anG re erence oroefed.
In tDe matter OIL Eliza schwartz. an alleged
lunatic.-Order Tor commitment granted.
Fagg W.. Howarc.-MOlI0n granted.
Sruaweh e. al ". kumast ct al.-Motion
granted, win costs.
Gre 4 vs.. Naturalization granted on paw
meuf ~ costs.
Harrison vs.. GarretG-Decree ordered.