, 1875-09-17

s.n or spoken ~ him which tcl him IN thnnaa
'a; liz isaov.i Of n' ~ 'Des 'aea '''i o.
5 e e, 3 sps,s s ssn; 1s , h R Ds 81 Etc.
20 ea'. ~ that lie could vo!e for The resolution II
wa .gnc.' do~n ana snodhed bn. Il VIA not To bo
wo!!d modify tone II d,wn. 1t waa perfectly mt
ai s1 sna tsssonalc tlag for Them to tnstfy theif
right AID natural Ter theta i.1o 1,innrity} II t4kn
wholly different position. This nnorlty had been
spokhn Of With rel. -I'!s rab!e t1a3hapt..
Ur. alcAuldyf did desirs 10 lay any etnthasis
on 1t.
Chancellor Judd-1lc tlmry referred 10 last years.
minority.
Dr. sulIvau-That minority lart ycsr consi.t~. Of
thfty-sLrec forty htths Of the whole Church Dr ba
Church would - IN aeeold With him. Thst va, 4
. fef sn Tne9 tnsy .
TIMED to rsfsr ito c'uns! ,I"u.e - at I'LL .aopt su :.
tteEy u.tersnce II 1t but III echo Of thu 1Ioly
oan1t. and ought to be 10 REGARDED BY every
on 10 sho~ ~ h' m .ESn Eu
car's contrary to the }aaurai nf the Bishops ot
~. ~hlrh rroc!aued sueh views II dAnycroux 10 tho
The leT Iii. rereiral sas Il. this dl.cu,.:n- a7os.
fs"11 confHo4' q minds Wit! rrc.td 10 fu,d.nrnt
meant Did It mean that it any ditaRr-e. with
HIN that that isrtun was untouna7 sonndaesH In
te fAith consisted to HtbscritRH IN tho kenttt1 tf
The rrayer.ionr, aud Dr. Ue Kosen had snLscruxd 10
every Que Ut them.
Df. suuran-Yes, he has subacrtbed 10 every seu.t.
mtnt !n tbs rr7yet-book and Thing more.
The Ter. Mr. rcrcival-Thcn II that "stmcthi1g
moro IL not authar1taiirely condemned ty the
Tic pastoral Of ths r!sAoEs authoritative con-
domination, even II it had been esreeiaily directed
psritio, ad nut the Ia. rrnrlcs Of re:,go. sntra-
lion. At the last Convention tbs sasingu:ah-a pres+
byter who had tuht taken his stat wan candidate.
Dr. BulhsaE-1 wR8 not q candidate. did Aat Eeek
the honor.
THE NET. MI. rERcryAL.
did MT use the term candidate In any such fense.
uacd Il In *he ordinary Sense Ut man brought for
ward for III Office aud there is au!bhas Oh
word. IT. continued he the gentleman had een eieet
con1denee IN Tho religious opinions and thu aDnndne.s
IN the faith Of tho candidate might nave been Tut
heart. man could believe : great 1nsuy thinsa
which othcra d not bclisrc and YET be sond IN tie
faith. oue pitto of charity aud toleEasion would
llow TO the winds such position. Ile ",
about tbs heterodosy Of Dr. De Koveo, who on!5
think on questions regarding which tho Church hAl
not abaoluet5 ruled. lLe would te asha1ned u any
sent to tho toniug down Of tho resolution nta.
| Dr. Locko recommcndel the house not 10 discuss
| The matter further, but 10 vote Upon Il.
yention out Of Ct namrs, q If ths clergy woull be
found to have signed Dr. d. Korens tsstllnonia III
which the expression "Souudnes Of faith dir
,.uct5 used Therefore hc hell the argument against
| voting fur Ito resolution WA unten4b's.
~ aonn ~ thts grntemsn resumed alA s"a sevo.Sl
ohers sirang to cir feet for the ftEose Of atreHF
"QussEon."
TIE RET. ntn. BENEDICT
managed to galu tho atteuton Of tho house. Ee sail
| 10 had bored no:AEg would have impaired the hss-
1nony Which lad been uaugurntcd Wednesday, AMI he
trusted The remainder Of tho dtscusttoo would DO
tuc,ed without acHmony. I: IVES matter Of 1m!t
and grief to him to bs obliged to dissent from many Of
Aa irends In shi. Do kov.n matter nat ht. di.ssat
CONVICTIONS With sc8Afl 10 DR.. De koVens views.
| 10 Was glad this question h.d come up, because
Of the arpAreny talte position In which It had beeu
placed especially II now stood In seeming antagou-
ls. to tho Of tho Church. The reverend grntio-
man then went on to stato The circumstances under
which tho lats Bshop-cec: ws socted md said thai
o!oesso1 could to 70 aten a. "a srrovnl s this po
xese not aludod to In the discussion rno. 10 that
rcws n1th regard to tho Holy Eucharist not IN
accordance with the laws Of tho Church, and remarked
was tn danger Of being subject trial for Hualsm
The AeE. Mr. terciral-Why Wan that sr1a1 not hetd
rhe Ioy. ar. Benedict Thought It WAS account Of
the trouble and scandal which generally fsncd from
auch trials. But hu did discuss that ques-
ton. Tho eauop adopted by tho General conxeu.ion
Koven Gshstel that the doctrine tho teaching Of
tho Church. He made tho assertion hu. eonld not
wr.o IN i"s. ey .s
tho subject was discussed at length and It endeav
cred TO show therein that this doctrine followed from
suets mind End snlue reasoning tbs wrung might
10 made to sppear right; but they could not fAl4fy
not Leu oacce1stal In ~" the h,.ossa s1on phasa na
| Of his argument II Ills doctEips had been
tho do:ssne of Tho Catholic Church In MI ases. let
them know it. Dr.. De K0ren pretended to prove that
such waa the cssa He quoted from four Of tho al
cden. iiluta1as certain asagoa, but in not of
euclsrtsuc alteration used literally or substantially
ln III hoss Ancent turges there was Of course alosa
ton paid 70 Tho sssor ~ to TIC other rersous Of the
"a thA rHfIa .4rf
"lnteaae Adora.on." and D. Do Koyca from Il these
prayers and servcsa inferred tho doctrine Of tho Aof-
TIM historical argument, and certainly il that had een
thu icaehhg Of the Church Of En8laud 1t would hAye
Quotations wcre made from Thorpe, Thorudsle, sni
bishop Andrews-an learned diyinca Of tho
Church Of England IA lndorstns this doctrine. Now
Wss the old ra that unlTeEsAlty determined 1t. And
4 wAs smother rue That exceptions proved. There
this matter In conclualop, he stated that he could
not vots for this resolution, which indorseA Dr.. De
K1vonh soundnaaa Of faith.
Tho Rer. Ar. Dresser moved 10 ,ay tbs resolution
On the table.
TIE 1kv. MR. KINNEY
ns1t took tho door and commenced BY saying THAT
Que w.a mora cunlretsut to CONSIDER tie subject his
tor4ealy than himself, fer he had spent years ot
eatnest study in tho lnvcaug.t4ou Of ecces!astcal
ID Il s s'sa sah t. sus: ill., ..s s'
rsss. GIsd ii aaa by s md ~ r.
tic Armenian, tho AbyAlnnian, and other
ancient churches. III fact they could not ind ouo
auticnt Church that did not Adoro chsst In the
nasnt. hr. Kinney proceeded to s!sp = learned and
elaborate asgn!nen: IN support Of this position. cu
bFActug Tho Church laws md u9aRe4 for several bum
dFea He considered this attemps 10 drive Dr.
| bs Ko1sn out of the Churvh burning shame. II
they went right down Into the Chrtaan heart Ut ts
community. i!oooo At least Of tho commandments of
~ Episcopal Church sdosed their Lord and Master.
sso.,sd hana. As Nv tho priest putting Into their
they took H. Ho aAted them 70 look into thoir heara
sn4 not to look 1t tho subject from : Theological
EtaulFotA.. lie asked the Christians OF IllnoIs
vhat they meaut in 10 doing. Why, they
| ne&nt that they believed Christ Wa
Fteaaut somewhere different from what uo was any,
whprs also out Of the communion, snl they believed
that It wa right 10 trest Him With al the respect they
could. l1e did moi want hAs-splltdngH Or ulcs dis
ttncuons. 1ia did not want men dr,Ypn ous Of ths
ChrtasAn Church for holding such bsl!sf liz want
Cd broad Catholic Church which woul dembrAoe sy-
srJbod5 who beliorod in the Thirtyn!ns Articles tho
cfsed, rho Loras supper. and tho Ton Command
1usnts Is did not caro, theo1ogtcal!y, what ! tn1a
believed. IEo had nevur spoken 10 Df. ue Kosen ur