St. Johnsbury Caledonian. [volume] (St. Johnsbury, Vt.) 1867-1919, 1875-04-16
The Beecher Trial.
NEW YORK, April IL.


mere are no i.r'her ueNei0pmehts IN
'he bee'her- iitoh case tho,!gh all
sorts Oh ruihois are rile rcSirulhg the
character Oh the evidence 10 ne adduced
ed that Martha bradshaw. Frank Car
penter, Joseph A. Richards, ii. {. Bowen
and the Rev. DR.. StorrS will all he
brought on the witness stand, and that
important revelations are yet to come.
Beach Is almost well, and. should he
continue Impr' wing, Will he III court on
Monday. RHm"r again SAYS Mrs. hilton
Is t" I've proposed ;tS Il witness by the
defence, but whether the prosecution
/ VII object Is not known. Mr.. Cleve-
land Is getting better and hopes Ia he
able t" testify not long after Beecher.
His testimony viii relate chiefly to
Heechri> whereabouts on June :, 1913.
r;lcl says all the evidence Will he III
Nithih 'hiec weeks an" summing III,
VIII require NV" weeks more. 'he OF
Mf. bterhers lawyers says ne pune
mas htth stipi ls'd i'll WHAT has ALREADY
oe'h diNul%ed' "ut WHAT Is l" come VIII
cause thtir eyes ana ears l" open Nhlcr
imam ever. thc remaining leSii-
monN' thrh' :" important asked the
reporter. I'VE :" consider II, ana Noh
may resi- assured thal IL VIII rIlhch inc
ni'li> when Henry W ara btcchcl has
dllNcn mt" the moral CONN oil ht"-
d"r" luton an" iahcis ID. M"ult"h.
gossip AEoI-T MIS-. THROWS POSITION.
NJ .r;I
''' vi
"" '"S' Wv i-'S'' say 1t
| ~! N""" Nh''''e' '''' ,'">' "'''" WI
"'Ier'. h't'!i"t '"'i> inns way VI
i'"' II - anu nv - "'''' II '"NV
1t" aPlr" ne WINS iii'' ne WI.
waive 'ile objection TO make p"ii'
,"I iiH@IAliIiniii anh ll'rr"ll'N' before
WI EN'lt> VIII ave Il rn'h'e '""Pl"''''
ne h''t''ri YOU" 'h'" "t\"'Nt '"'i''
~ on !'"?c .\tliS"h' Is ho' hho"h
Nn''l MS views ""''iu ne III Tue tNt"'
"i "n'l sizes t"lI>'h''hS. II M"'Ih "r-
penn ON now II" l'Eal"> me law Oh the
l,"l'A "i me l'l"l"'>'limn' ne hrr'h'i
SIDE are Wiling WIS. 'I'"h >i"uI" les
,nH. ne il''"'' >'it aver II Is saul
''''' INV ~ n"' """ -"
=" 'l''' WI / mon !. i '''l"'''''' "' "'','-
III" us VIE. HI''i'h' mariner I'Nt'
VIII" MS sIii''lI'S eye ne once
-''> ur' %" tue "'i,'N> >''i'"' "''u'
.,i," h''I'"% "i"' MIS-: @'tnt"i' H""
MISS -t WI, ana P'>>',.N Mss ''
'H'f lI'"h' ''''i"'IH MIS-. N"''''""'
az ~ ~" "i',"' ,'t"''' '''> IT. l" in",n
W "'"'. H"''''' sue '' 'l,' >l"'''''
lm'" sustaining "e' "">'''''i e\ h'ti,'''
~; 't''"'''' '''' pei >''''''e' 'i''' VI,
=, "'"'' ",''".'!N "','," '""!'' III "
J." -. "''' ,"'
J'N ~. ''"A ~ ','',l,. 'i'', '''''
, Inc '',",' T." 'r"" "t' "",''" ''i'',i'E,
II" ''''' ~ '''','
'''"'. U.s. ,',l%',i WIN ~ NUM-
same WAY MI. IilIon> was. BY swear
ln@ that ne told Nh. Bcccher What Mrs.
llt"h SAID. llt"h got II pretty much
all III. lht Tribune SAYS: Mr. Beech
Ell : counsel are unwilling to admit that
1t Is their hNcd purpose TO call Mis-.
ili'"h' "Ht from other sources "f In-
formation IL Is Known thaf such Is then
determination. 1t Is known with Ger
talntN that Judge Nelson has declared
hc viii permit Mrs. Hilton I" testify II
both sides consent t" 1t. The defense
recognize perhaps that public sentiment
dtnahds an "lfcr 81 Mrs. Hilton test
ln"nN, ana they VIII make the Offer tor
tW" reasons. According to Mr. Beech
FL liiehd>, theA want her testimony III
the first place. being satisfied II Will
c"rr"h"rate Mr.; Beecher Ill every I'M
p"rtant Particular. and Introduce the
needed narration of circumstances un-
der winch the defense allege that the
confession and other papers were forced
from her by hei husband. The second
reason Is. that II they do not get her
testimony 1t Will place the plaIntltf III
the position of excluding it. and this
they believe Will strengthen their case
before the Jury and public.
WI, NIP. prr,,,,rp rr.r,rx
M; ,,
,I. M, H. " ~ ''t;'' ,''' ',r i'"H'
80, WV 50 - y" 'nf '''"S ''s :,