New-York tribune., 1875-01-14

snd MI Ttoar rwee " NOT evidence How ishe ~ fnd pu
what the honest relations b9tween Bowen apq hr
Tton heard between raises The question
then whether the subject admissible But bis Judgment
does not Ut IHCQTq p'sIgnOM .fH
Nh FullertonI do not ssk hs judgment ssk The -
70 the relations existing beNeen hr B0ssn ana hf Ip'on
They now come In question. t-., .ger ,,i,,ris, =.
= yadse Nsusoa 4w ,hnk you q 30 content with
the general statements that they friendly or not you go
beyond that Ought communicated 70 the DEFENDANT
conyersstion9 80 10 0qci1mnUn9D tiA 'l'"V4 A-'o
Mr.. Falerton~why Sir mppose 10 Ia competent Tor me v"
show that Mr. Bowen she propreor OF the indseasa
Judge Nelson-Certainy. MI tsfj n0itneUl9g olg O.
Mr. Fullerton that Mr. TIton was In hs employ as an
editor propose 70 show sso that he bad relson ''
Brooklyn Uion and another newspaper In this city p
Mr. Eyss Il have objection % that tieif relations
~ Judge Neison1wen go on. 'f7l' IN '',i .'
Mr. on can prove them BY h BY any body else
Fulertoi Well 70 propose 70 do. suppose
the gentleman understands sons things without my sahs
much about them.u He spoke Of seresed citations with pr
Bowen Ito the wness oEpws want 70 know yhsf those
reations were A. He was associated with Mr. Bowen as eoi
or OF The Union. "a - 60, s;-,,1g IA sl
u BY Mr. nm 4was hcn, OF had been, A lie had bcen
Sir. Il f]d E5i1o7Sb hollFt .lih a9h" 'Ii'l' .ou =
o Now az 10 me 1.dpena,r A. He had been editor Of
The 1adseat and made eoatsct as contributor TO
Tis IudqesdatrI 5dt &c a)n3 ,19h Ict 3io.s Li -
% Nov repeat you please what you said to Mr. Bescher in
speeng what had heretofore taken paco between them a
told him that he intended to pab that letter 70 make clear
the for the Of their relations at,i, 4
@ And II was that letter that understand you that you
were going 10 ttT to cdhtrotf A. Yes, Sir - 4
so as to keep Of anything Of the personal nsters
stween Mr. Beeeher and N.Y. lton-is that IT. A. Yes Sir
O Very we'll nosy what else occurred 10 that time, you
remember apyhipg elet A. Idon uemember just present
@ Do you know anything or did you learn anything from
Mr. Beecher in regard to letter which he had wen 70
Bowen g. He told that he had written ettef 70 ni
Bowen explaining back something that ne hsd saa
about lsay 10 Mr. Bowen He had told me previously
omitted that Isr-he had tod me previously that ne
had sympaiisedss told him before, the interview OF
December sist,g aud then he told me on January i'
that he had mentioned a lsd5s name v M s sa
Bowen and told him that that was vor unjust and he said ne
youid take back and on January 3D. he d me that ne had
written 10 Mr. Bowen taking IL back I'5 D"N v'" O
= O. BY Mr. EysrtsA Unjust TO whomi A. Unjust 20 the
woman Sir o. a 01I,, adj ~ ~ ,
@ Well, did he show you the letter A. Yes Sir he showed
a day or two Afterwards, Fl. - .
Ioot at the paper now shown you and say whether that
the rough he showed your A. Yes, Sir that is it,
cTPaper shown to DEFENDANT counsel i 'ls
Mr. Fullerton.l Resdingl Brooklyn January ID, 1911
my DKAa Mr. BowEs since saw yon last Tuesday have
reason to think the only OF which spoke to you In
regard Ton exaggerated in being reported to me-
and should unwilling 10 have anything said though 1t
was but little weigh your mind in matter 80 important to
his welfare 4 am informed by whose judgment and
integrity greatly rely and who has the means OF forming an
opinion better than any OF that he knows OF the whole
matter about Mrs b." Shall /
Judge Neilson-No do not give the name st lergh.
Mr. Eyarts-what does your Honor sayt I~.
Judge Nelson give the at length there is no
occasion for it. o. t..i,. .1 l rU..-. ORG r....
Mr. Evsrtswe they must the responsibility Of read
ing letters or not reading them. .--. ...r
Mr.. Besch-we take the responsibility Sir Of giving the
initials of the name
Mr. EvartsWl your Honor let the letter be mperfecty
read
Mr. Beach--T you want il, read H.
Mr. Evats-Not oil don't read the letter offer it.
The responsibility with the counsel to read the letter omit
the letter ..-..u.f.. ..l...
Judge NesonIt does not follow however the letter is
be omitted because may contain the OF third per
son. which ought not to be given publicly letter
might contain matter material and proper TO be given and con-
tain the third person proper to be given So for
the present, make the suggestion to the counsel.
Mr. Eyars-Your Honor does intend to rule that letters
can be imperfectly read
Judge Neilson-No
Mr. Fuleron is not imperfect reading Of the letter it
Withholding the whole In the interest OF decency
and popey to aagn here who ought not to be
arraigned.
Mr. EyasYou Honor does not rule that they have
right to read the letter imperfectyf
Judge NesonI rule that II the letter be at all material they
may read It, omtting Of the third person referred TO-
Mr. Evarts-To that except.
Judge NesonThe of the third person referred to moi
being at all material. .. r....
Mr. Eyarts--That we don't know.
Mr. Beachwe give the letter in evidence and we read such
part choose.
Mr. Fullerton-Yes, Sir and the gentlemen can read the
whole name II 1t subscrvcs their purpose
Judge NesonIf you put in paper and read few lines OF
IT, is all put in by you The other side, they desire can
read the rest OF Il, because you have put it in.
Mr. EyarsYour Honor will allow US either to except or else
understood that the whole letter considered as read
Judge Neison-Ohl the whole letter Is in.
Mr. Eyarts-And considered as reads
Judge Neson-Bu they read such portion they chose
and you any portion Of you will be reading the docu
ment which they put In.
Mr. Eyarts-I understand we will consider 1t all in.
Judge Neson-Yes Sir f...I ..
Mr. Fuerton(Resumin the readng) II am informed By
judgment and integrity greatly rely and who
has the OF forming opinion better than OF that
he knows the whole matter about Mrs B, and that the
stories true and that the is the with ohe
stories this do wish any reply Ihoughit only due
TO Justice that should say much. Yours H. W. Beecher
O. Now when did you next have interview with Mr.
Beecher and where A. Within the nex-withn that week
do not remember the day think the third fourth
Q. And where' A At my house.
O. Under what circumstances A Mr. Beecher the
house to me- home and Mr. Ton there, and
they met in my presence . ...-..
O. State whether you know that meeting acc
dental or not between those gntemeni A. 1t scci
dental.
O. Now, what occurred A. well Mr. Tilton not cor
dial, Sir
O. Now, what occurred' A. Well Mr. Tilton was not cor
dial. H....
BY Mr.. Evsrts-what occurred A Do you mean what wa
saidi .- . ..-. .y ..-4
@ No. we want the facts hrst do not want what tool
place. g .. .
Mr. Fulerton-we WIN submit that the witness has stated
there was want Of cordy between these parties that