New-York tribune., 1875-06-30

this notion the defsnt may bo opened Otherwise
ease. and must 10 for TAXATION By
G 9s are rss ~ 5sls e ssssSs 'Sr
he be eonsTwsa IN IT, peS'a e vma
II appears Tat the defendant tn, has done "ns'nns syaase
sns nss'ff9s foPs #. 'Ai aal5 ps the an
pTsaas ID ssS Sps T. as c SSt % remain mai
to the Injunction In improved eondron Motion as Zoo
late; l. us" Is ,ho,fore denied with $40 Willard ag
Of dcdS 4, the msng s on the s s eo second
rsss Is senocns Of Fs1 eop E of IL nae Secess Third
IL. % bTnsg N neT S Ss ms o than an se@mencns
ncw suit Motion shSrd be- asned with 40 costs and with,
prejudice any action that plaintiff may oe "'seu
dg rr. Nsio93 - B,ok SaSe Of SoesG Tay
The r Bowen under te G eHseas hH I % e n .o o
Rs S 20 rgr & 81 &nn Ssa s sS sxscs s
by assignment from ocr to sd before sSn any q n .ne The
judgments a. that time & e & .nSre n ie ' en Of e
plaintiffs attorney the ease Of oor ag Bowen ami Ie ~
tachmeut execution Cred Of Poor acqul.ea no % %
"a agas 20 s%. Swar % bel Be ao a o. cu think
hoseISr That aiiony fr rooT is rss,sS entitled dS 70
ssss %o ssr. bis so1c ' DENYING @ en- Se S sT
embodyng the PROVISIONS suggested above E1n' @e ne
rMS1sSse so (" snys Ssse aas VA Int Si tic
4 s "el MTs @ 'P When SaI bs not sSR
troiuced The Ne, YORK L,sc- wss cooperation m psPe a
s snS the Taes St Gs san sS
Il n f c.%0 "ee ard SpeSS sSn S;Y rSSrc ss his
S'tF %ent Of ,S ,Su ns s "s nsder he sniSoFv q tie
IN ~ tie newspeIs e%Poyed by s sSS T., psTs6i s
clear that the resolution was not pbIshe here'n ei.f I'M I'm I'M
mss h iac, thereon e rue S the snbseqeni Grneon q re
s ss as n Gafr 70 Rs e cmo @ s Goa
obyi,e te pettossrs objections to NE sssSnent rns
Wien he oaticr was ntrodnccd into the Board OF coancl
as r" aHs s a M @, BE 'f The
cai.d lIsTas Ihe y.r , ~ IN 1s f a fdeIts.
ness pail Of the moneys col
Srr n,ent not f beng levied Within year creditor soud be
o @ oa - the S eesr eioT II Ike act Of sc6 eonisnds BY
me Corporation coanL and strike o1' The TIns wgm,s
Motion Judgment sr,nntod WITH IN ,ocsns costs
advanced by Apps in Andersons case the mo
ere S% 70 to T psoaer to- 70 make farther proofs he
sas sy i r,day Snis a Ts q rd I E e must
Ds IL Z %af1 70 seTs , M te IA qJ c G eoSy All
@ 4" 10 rpors ns %n his opinion Rrecn Gecrse s
% S % recent @ es Of anen & & the
Court S APPEAL. G dsrss % that ss ' & 81 9S5 s, ee @
newspapers under the Of 1868 did Deeoms operative
until ne same had heep to the the gnnHn s 0%nn
vas male rntl pl25 1871 while te resolution Sa- in
wiS was adopted by that Board April y. is7lsee
rPsf eo for sG e S petitioner ahcrrior to me
sr g ne Ma ot r5 E'a ane S the S a the Of
nicad 10 tho Common oanc doe' not aaec ms e1s s Of m
only oca paper that existed at any lime wlas t proceed
anil there could have been three day publication ID t
Charter $50 2l assessment Is therefore NdCHtt
NversI this order or stipulation las
decentralization to vacite assessment IL
cranted In Ni,lnT distinguish this
rsOn, recently decided and on the ath'r
ity constrained Ia the duplication
the assessment with liberty e. petition to make rthf
proofs sol advised Davis age IangdOn.-Orler grlntod
Superior 'OHvt-Speirl Jivm-Bv Judge Speir-
Germ agt. rsko satisfied from the papers that ne
fsn'an; Fiske siOu heard II al which sacc1r
l. upon his paying fla costs oi the motion ana me
disbursements the former tri1l Judgment ag.Dst him
oil proceedings stayed unfh the lrtier o'er pt
order . s1ttlod Tribune AssnfLt
on agt Smifh--Case AMI amendments settled. Nolr agt
close examination 81 the testimony IN ts
think efendat must have Judgment Ley an 0rer
pursuance OF tho stipulation be
tween the parties.
Cannon Pleqa-SpAcal TGm-By Judge Loow.-
Consolidated Frat Jar Go. aY Mason Motion Denied nut
wiOat COTS: memorandum. UNievi1 ATT BIian-Mo
"A pendiny the appeal o tho General Term oi le
prantai Go'irg ag Goliman.1t seems 20 ne tlat
General Term OF this Court III he
r. d. Smith i) the pei oncr not upon the
plpt submitted 90 entitled 70 his DISCHARGE the eS
y, de-r, Abbam ct al ai.The motion 10 Hie
amended allowed regards The Two
If the prop0sd amended answer Ihe otr
matter proposed TO be If true, would not amount To an
est0ppe IN DaiS.
The People Bri,ll The People ec ag casey aud
nno forfeit -Notiors crantcl DAILY, Oh j.
CaRhos Butterie1 OrleF appealed from reversed and
judgment favor Of defendant bgr ED entered Dee IT,
1872, set aside irregular Daily Cl j., and j. r. ply j.
Clnbos ag ButteraCi Order reversed DAILY Oh. j., aud
the Judgment rcd upon the report o tho reference
affirmed Dlly, Ch. j.