New-York tribune., 1875-03-06
TIE PAMPHLET.

TIE PAMPHLET.
The first charge of unjust representation is
thisi have stated that the Pope condemns liberty o
the press aud liberty OF speech BY reference TO the
original IL shown that the rsht OF printing ano
sneakiuc IL not in terms condemned uniyersaly Du'
ouly the right Of each to print or speak oil Dis
thou shts s,os eonoeptus quoSeHnque Whatever tney
may be- Hereupon justly observed that IN oil coun
tries there are against blasphemy or oosoen'ty OF
seditlon OF three argued, then that men are
not allowed right 20 speak print all their thoughts
and that such an extreme right only is what the Pope
has condemned.
Il appears to me that this is TO use mild phrase
mere trfing with the snbec We asked TO believe
that what Popo intended 10 condemn was state o'
things which never has existed 10 any country OF the
world. Now he says he is eOBdemnng one OF the com
monty prevailing Of the time Familiarity known to
the bishops whom he addresses. What bishop knows o
state which by law allows perfectly free course to
b!asphemy. fthiness aud seditionf The world knows
Oui;e well what by free speech aud free press
IL mean generally, perhaps 1t may be said uniyer-
sally, the right OF declaring all opinions whatsoever
TBo limit of not the business Of the opinion
this that T. shall opinion in good faith and
Gr0ssness, passion or appeal TO violence The
law OF England al this moment, allowing all opinions
whatever provided they treated by way OF rational
discourse, most closely corresponds TO what the
Popo has condemned. His condemnation is Illus
trstcd by bis own practice Governor In the Roman
bat such as he approved Once indeed, he permitted
free discussion oil St and preacy in the
city; but he repented quickly, and forbade the repet
ton of it, We might cite his practice as Pope in
1870 where everything was done 10 keep the proceed
ngs Council secret from the Church which 1t pro-
fessed represent aud even practically secret from it's
members except who Of the governing cabal
But there can better mode of exhibiting his real
meaning than by referring to his account OF the
Austrian law. Hdc lege ODnis omninm Opinonum ct
l6rarU arts h6FtnS, onnS t,tn dei, tun conScenhG
nc doctrine. hbertas Slau From the Pope's Allocu-
ton OF June % "By this law established uni
versa liberty all opinions and of the press and as OF
belief. OF conscience and OF teaehns.] To the kind
of condemnation given shall again refer; but the mat
ter Of itl nothing abstract imaginary-t is actual
freedom of thinking speaking and printing. as it Is
praeticed in great civilized and Christian empire. L
repe then, the charge against better than a
verbal subterinGe; aud again affirm that in his Syla-
bus as IN his acts Pope has condemned liberty OF
speech and liberty Of the press.
TIE MARRIAGE QUESTION.
grave charge is made against respecting the
naIimOual propositions, because have cited the Pope
az condemning those who affirm that the matrimonial
contract IS binding whether is is not according
TO The Roman dcctliEc sacrament. and have not at
the same stated that EIglsh marriages are beld by
Rome 10 b. sacramento, aud therefore valid.
No charle. slJu5 or slight, could be more entirely
futile, Eut IS serious and not slight, and those who
l. am ccnsured for not having given distinctions be-
tween country and another which the Pope hlmsef
. And wu.cA arc also thought unnecessary by author
ized expOunders oi the syllabus Ior the fathui nave
before t.6 Exposition, with the eXt, Of the Enel-
oea and Sy. ayd,, published at Cologne IN 1874, with
tton In D. 4 u E distinctly taught that WIN marriage
tho State nothing do that IL may safeyrely upon
SaarcD, only cOncuOnage and that the State by the
use o. worldly cOnpuioOn, prevents the TWO concu-
guilty re!atIoa another. Exactly the same Is the
doctrine OF Pope himself in bis speeches published
CnristIans. nothing than "a mere concubinage,
ana d filthy concubinaSe $3.50 eo"eati"atO)
to the iouGnees Of the POn;if for speaking
inprompiu In his letter of Sept. Is. 1889,
TO King Victor Emanuel, he declares that natrmony
carrSnS tho Sacrament alone lawful for Christians
and that law of clvil marriage, which goes to divide
In the guSe OF legitimate maj mage 80 that In TRUTH
ia All countries within the scope OF these denunciaons
in an illicit connection which they called upon TO
renounce This,ca Is addressed 10 them separately as
well as Jointly the wife being summoned TO leave her
husband, and the husband 10 abandon his wife and
after tins pretended repentance from state OF sn un
the Of the land and fear OF consequences pre-
vai new OunCction, under the name or marriage,
may be formed with the sanction OF the Church OF
Rome. know not by what infatuatOn it's that adYer
tares nave compelled me thus 10 develop state OF
facts created by the highest authorities OF the Roman
Church. wnlch shall now not shrink calling nor
rbe ana revolving IN ITSELF dangerous 10 the morals OF
lie.
IHE AVAILABILITY OF THE POPE.
After citing various authorities to sustain his view Of
me dogmac of the Syllabus, denied by Dr. New
man. Mr. Gladstone proceeds to consider The Vatican
Council and the Infalhbty OF the Pope"
Like the chefiains Of the heroic time. Archbishop
Manning takes his place with prompttude, aud oper-
stes front Of the force he leads.
Upon the first appearance OF Inv tract, he instantly
gave utterance following propositions; nor has
lie since recedec from them:
l. That the IDfalhOility OF the Pope was doctrine
\ Ilyiu r. hcl
That the Vatican DEGREES have in no iot little
changed either the obligations the conditions OF civil
allegiance.
That the civil allegiance Of Roman Catholics is as
undivided that Of other Christians andnether more
nor less limited. o., ,. =,
civil in certain rs tue same as
that made 10y other religious eommuni0ns IN EngIahd
These four propositions may be treated as Two. The
arst IA 10 viii the second anu the thlrd WIN the
fourfh that two members OF cach pair respectively
oust stand or fall together make objection 10
the manner In winch they raise the question: Shail
esve IN 10 Others whom II more concern, 10 treat
that portiou OF his work ia which, passingDy matters
touched his argument ne mas entered
at large on the controversy between Rome ana the Ger
man EDpire; nor shall now discuss MS compendium
Of italian history which IN no manner touches Tue que
tOn whether The dominion OF the Pope ought again 70
be imposed by foreign arms upon poruoh oi the
Ian people. But Of the four propositions WIN say
accept them all. subject 10 the very smpIe
that the word be inserted In the three when are
afrpatlve, and Its equivalent struck out from tne one
which is negative.
or, TO state the ease in my own words:
Ny task will be to make good the TWO following as
ssTtlons. which were Inc principal SUBJECTS OF my
former argument:
That uDOn the authority. for nauy generations. Of