The Lambertville record. [volume] (Lambertville, N.J.) 1872-1968, 1875-04-21

CouRT PRooEEDrNGs.--For the following
proceedings of our county court during the
past week, we are under obligations to the
Democrat and Republican -
The following licenses to sell Intoxicating
liquors wers granted:
J. B. r. Clark, Tewksbury William r.
Loudenberser Lebanon Skidman Wright,
Franklin, Asa Rittenhouse, Holland JAS
p. Lowe, Readington John w. Lowe, Clin-
ton James Smith Lebanon Mary A. Smith,
Bethlehem William G. Mettler, Alexandria
Mark Devlin, High Bridge William G..
Jones, Bethlehem William HI. Force, Rari
tan Theodore j. Young, East Amwell
George W. ShordRy, Raritan; Henry Tette.
mer, Alexandria A. W. Baldwin, Kingwood,
Edward Humphrey, Lebanon; Jacob K. VIII.
son, Delaware.
The following applications were refused
Amanda Apgar, High Bridge /; Ira Hig
gins, East Amwell Charles Bowlby, Tcwks
bury; Peter Van Fleet, Readington William
Burroughs, West Amwell.
The following applied for licenses TO KEEP
saloons and were refused:
jeremiah Kennedy, Lebanon Albert
Stevens, Lebanon.
The following is list OF the causes no
ticed for trial:
SUPREME COURT.
1. Peterborough VS. Hall, Adn'x E. r
Hall. Case. Leonard & Coult--Bird 6
Conkling.
2. Seals VS. Conver Ejectment. Allen
Voorhees, & Van Sycklc.
s. Pidcock VS. Klotz ct al. Case. Allen
Keasby'
A. Brown, ct al, VS. sproat. Ejectment
Van Fleet--Skillman.
8. Pidcock VS. Barcalow. Case. Allen
Voorhees, q Van Syckle.
8. Neyius Lutes, ct al. Case. Van Fleet
Reed.
Z. Bloom, Ex'r John AlleD VS. Aller
Case. Van Fleet--Bird.
8. Reed VS. Smith. Case. Sanderson-
Honeyinan 8 Herr.
0. Emery VS. Davis, Jr. Case. Clark
Fitch.
TO- Elys VS. Akers. Debt. skillman-ser
geant. M ss
II. The Monroe County Bank VS. Poulson,
ct al, Adm'rs Hudnit. Cutler--Allen.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Z /. Banghart VS. Gardner, ct al. Case.
Bird Voorhees, & Van Syokle.
2. Apgar VS. Gulick. Replevin. Allen
Voorhees, & Van Syckle.
8. Mason, ct al, VS. Kitchen. Trespass.
Sergeant Trimmer.
4. Dekator VS. Reinert. Case. Allen
Ekillman.
s. Huffman VS. johnson. Case Van Fleet
& Bird---Allen.
9. johnson VS. Uhler. Case. Trimmer
Bullock.
2. Bowden, ct al, VS.. Hunt Replevin,
Trimmer Skillman.
s. Bowden, ct al vB Kitchen. Trespass
Trimmer & Siillman.
O. Everitt VS. Lake. Case. Van Fleet
Chamberlin.
10. Robertson vs. Holcombe Case. Allen
Skillman.
IL. Rittenhouse VS. Osmun. Replevin. Skill
man-Trimmer.
10. Sellers, ct al, VS. Scarborough. Case
Observation-Disclosures q Van Syckle.
13. Gale VS. Taylor. Case. Chamberlin--
Sergeant.
IA. Force vs. Lance, ct al. Case. Bird
Hoffman.
10. Field VS. Field. Attachment Var
Fleet--V Voorhees, & Van Syckle. AiA
10. johnson VS. Hunt. Case. Voorhees, &
Van Syckle-Wyckof.
II Van Doren & Son VS. Rogers. Case
Wyckoff- Hoffman.
1s Van Doren VS. Eick. Case. Voorhees,
Van Syckle- Sanderson.
10. Gulick VS. Leigh, ct al. Case. Case
Chamberlin-Kuhl.
20. Apgar VS. Farley. Case. Allen-yoor
hees & Van Syckle.
81. Francis vs. Warne. Case. Voorhees, 8
Van Syckle.
90. Bloom VS. Williamson. Replevin. Ser
geant-Dunham.
20 The Trenton Wise and Tool Works v
Alpargh ct al. Case. Voorhees, g. Val
Syckle-Connet & Khul.
"a. Lance VS. Sutton. Case. Hoffman
Sanderson.
25. Gulick VS. Sutton. Case. Hoffman,
Voorhees, & Van SICKLE.
20. Humphrey ct al VS. Carhart. Case. Hof
man-Fan Fleet.
FOR ARGUMENT.
1. Pout VS. Lott, ct al. Demurrer. Vool
hees & Van Syckle--Allen.