New-York tribune., 1875-02-17
THE EXPECTED RESULT OF PUBLISHING THE TRUE


THE EXPECTED RESULT OF PUBLISHING THE TRUE
STORY.
@. Now you may state what object you expec'ed
TO accomplish published, by its publication
Mr.. Evars-Wait a moment
Judge NeilsonThere objection 10 het; think he may
answer that
Mr. Eyarts- your Honor please counsel asks him what op
rect he expected 70 accomplish II It published Now,
published and therefore there not any act OF NE
that needs explanation
Judge Neison-Tne limited way you called It out on eross
examination. go
Mr. Fullerton- will alter the question What OBJECT a"
you expect accomplish by writing that paperf
Mr. Eyars-That matter been introduced by them on
their direct examination and the witness has stated that II
written proposed form Of publication and that II was
read TO Beeche and that interview took place concern
ing regard that have asked no question and the new
matter of my only in respect to the exh
bion Of this paper
Judge EeisonYes II that so you Cd FuneHob) are ho'
OF liberty to put this question.
Mr. Fuler,on-why s he has nqsired in regard TO the
"True Story" has read many parts OF 1t TO the witness ana
asked him whether they correct aud he has rececd
his answers Now proper for to show what object nc
had in writing pspewhat the condition OF things at
that time which IN his Judgment made Necessary could
question until the contents OF THE True story
made known by the other side Now thoy have been
made part and is certainly desirable that this jury
should what object this gentleman expected 10 accom-
plish by the preparation OF such paper as that
Judge Neilson-I think he may answer the question.
Mr. Eyarts-That does dispace the fact that part
OF their original inquy-wha the object Of The True Story
Judge Neilson-The use you made OF ii.
Mr. Evarts-I made Of II bat to show what 1t was
could not affect his knowledge Of what was nor
knowledge OF the time prepared concerning which ne
has testified regarding which have asked him no question
whatever.
Judge Neo1-You brought the contents TO his knowledge
and recollection as they had not been brought before
hr EyaTts-I dent know that Id0nt know that was IN
his recollection
what speak Of.
Mr. Eyarts-u that adds nothing TO the author OF the story
that had composed it, told why he composed IT, and ior
what purpose concerning which have asked no single ques
ton, and now
Judge Neson-I think he may answer the question: Sir
Mr. EyartsYour Honor will be so good 10 note ezeep
ton to the ruling.
Mr. Fuerten-Now, proceed to state, Mr.. Gilton
Judge Neison- Gentlemen you will please refrain from ex
pressing opinion this poin II Il not called io al AL
Retain that in your mind until you get nome
Mr. FulertOn-Go on.
The Wness-My object In the preparation OF that narrative
was this: Ms woodhus tale, blasting family had been
six weeks before the pabc tn policy OF silence WHICH VIC
had originally agreed 1t with proving every day
more and disastrous and carrying ho1se down to rum
10 the public imaton undertook the prepara on OF mar
ratye which being published woui create In the pubic
mind an impression like this namely: ave never believed that
the Woodruff story true because was 30 eHtrayaah Out
always believed tn foundation for It, Now at
last we have the True Story and it IL not as bad as orgi
pay reported and IL exoneates Mrs Ton" My only object
was to pluck up by the MIRA Woodhu poisonous tale
and plant IN its place story less deeterous, and which
would hot erInnae my wife