, 1875-07-30
THE FORGERY CASE.
Third Day OF the Trial Of Il. IL.
Turner.
Testimony Of Reed, Patton, and
OthGrs.

leRotl forgery OF oortaio ticejs wAs rosu,ned It,
furo Ju,1go EarwcIl In tlla Crmnn! Court yescr-
tov ,,n-,,;,,,< ,r,,o o,o,n..,-Mcrar.. Ytnrrs and
a:ot. a, t.o'n".s' .n.s ~" .' ~, ,,n,d
o"ett-"oso ehr'F ." n"'o
Tho argument on tue a'lfn'as'h'it; OF certain
PORTIONS OF tho witneas Neesl'b evidence. which
foro, v.u unexpectedly opeuo.l again hv Mr.
haranm 1of 'i'o psosecn''o',' s anu 'hnes' tsrno
~aa co"S''h'sa " MN -" Hloso Al Gfeas
length. and cited wIAo range of
authorities to compel tho admission
OF 1Ised's testimony In relation To t,,o alIcued
con,,,l,v ~ Tnrror u.,, ,,,nau. l., ,,,to, t,r.
49,, ..':,,"a ~. w.. "' 't', ~ ,n 0'''' w.
ttsal,
alr. Emery A. atorrs t1en took m tho sreu-
n,ert II, ,chalf nf I'm eYcIus,,. nf auc, t..tt.
n,,,,u n. i,n,i u,s, ,,ass '.s, 49,
"'"f" az ''''' I'm. tueie ~.lr ''o i"e 10 aetet.
nl',o a''eli eaaea' "h'ol! at1n'tted Of u"se'aal
APPLICATION And that they 1nu8t lc dhcuea by
spocinl clrcuu,staucos II, tis case l,c fail lilo
alleged interest Of tho ,ro4crttou waH In i,,,,o.
""I" eF"'eh.o 'of lug Fufpose OF nrDSi"E tlio
guilty know'etgo OF tho defendant. Undoubtedly
tl'n pirPoHo was to Introduce 1t to corroborato
tito ,yitnoss teyti,nony In tho ,,tenont rnso. a
,,ou wcrt ;r,, vtr,, ,,.,,,',. .,,1 ..1's..:,s
sr,n,',, -. ,,o ,,a.. w., , "sr',' anu shn."as's"
argument OF tho matter, which occupied largo
stafo oi tho fomAlnacr VI tho 'norlIng.
Judge farwoil lleld that there nAs amule ay-
JGt1LD or uI1iltY khr11FhItrp aN
lin ar,1o,,ro n ,,tr,.ar',, ~ -N''A''
~n. JAMES nnEn
then took the stand, ind was first crosa-o1am-
witucsa admitted In Ind aato,, ~. =
| M, ,,,o, ~, '',,,;',a. '". t''se" tot
| H. et'e'' ''i 4o'sc!''
ne WIS ,,os certain w''e!''er or not Il WA Tor
set aside with right to reiustase. Wltncrs
| Ind hoc,, in ,ail H. III, ,,.,1 FURNISHED h,
III .";,,,.a. 49, As. sa er s",. 49," -"
oAi'' "iA"cs' nao uec'. Pro.n'"e" te'oane run
| prosecution II ho would testify. lilo had given
Testimony In tho United States Court In the caso
| hotwecn 1Il and Turuer. iIe hull blanks siu,i.
~ ~ a.. .,o. ,,,,, ,r1,;c, tbo f,rnoa 1no,t.
4Al " '.s ~ o'o1 uroi' "",'" h'a us."n
Of blanks IN hia tri,nk: The nala on tho deed,
with the exception ul tho zeal OF Now lorlf fur
| niahed By Turner, were pAt'er Eeals WHICH ha
bad lad In his 1nfse1siaI!. Witness
gury. lie thought it was not ~ long ago at
twonty rtwcntY.iyo yeart. i1tH bail on tlio laHl
bond wHH *l0,tnH lHnhec and Jerome wolo Lla
eonsa'non Oh tho first hn''!'
nesA Ra,tl l'e ind Eeon assured Of mol. pros If
ho would testify. lie had been thus AHa'sred be-
foFo bail a1ad l'ecn rrocnrod Hail Ind boon fur
| ntahod tu Kct INN out OF lslI.
MI. ill:SitY r. r.TTEX
vas the next witness. Lived nt 1T. Ionla. Vas in
titlcs to 1oa esIuto o. NJ. so Cllsstnut street.
1lad before beer! cmloyed tu make un records
qf p'aa Of ro,, ntn.s tor iS st. ions Count
acquaintance in Quincy Nas clupioyad by him.
Left blu. IN 1S12. Worked for hin, from 1858 TO
1877 with tho execution Of certain intervals. III
1h7l was employed By National Lifo-lnnurance
Company OF Chicago, ~ agent at Quincy.
Turner ltsca III Chimney. Knew Heed.
Met Lin tirat ut 1'rooktled, No., In
lBG8. 1io vas ut that puce with Turner
| III bu9ll1eHH. Turner DaA I'LL Office i'll Quincy.
HiH buslncBa was srecu!aiiug In ttlcs to real
estate in tho military tracts ~ iliinoa and Mis-
aoHrl, Fteuuehtiy saw Hood at InrnerH oiiioe.
year. WitneBs lad bacn Tn,nera confidential
| clark And bookGeepof. llaa heard Iurnor aud
| ltoed talk oycr rel!-estata business. Became
| acqualnted wish Ateds buh,eAs about 1870:
Learned II from Turner aid Heed. Had heard
Turner conrcrse with Heed III relation to cortain
! declH tho latter lad mado for him.
! Ono conversation WIS FGlatlYG TO lRtItB in Cali
| utnio, II