, 1875-04-21
THE COURTS.
Further Examination Of Wit
'ncsscs In tic State lii
Htlrtlneo Case.
Tho sny Island Lovee...Applications
for Divorces.

STATE INSURANCE.
DtttHt}iHt3 HT,u1yLY ALONG.

2tA WNoOHANtGs
DRAGGING Hr0Wl.Y ALONG.
1pfesas Ltsndtch n The ch,caaa Tribune.
WHEATON. April 20.-Tllo S.ato Insurance
Company case entered upon la eighth day t!,ls
morning, and appears to lcason III interest na 1t
grows In ago. For tho first tifne the Jutfge'h
patienco gayo way under tho pressure OF i'm.
material evidence, ntitl jururs showed Ritns Of
wcastucBH. "a lhey ro1nd frnm stda to side 1T
their Chairs, in search of comfortable attitude
for draatnland.
Tho cano was oponod with continuation Of
tie reading OF J. u. bmtll'a deposition, which
waa folused BY that Of j. II. Park.
!. II. rnuMAS,
partner Of N. c. rcrkinp, Of Chicago. was tue
1lrst witncsa: t1o cntorai tho Office Of perkins
In 1872, and know tho defendants, lie waa nc.
analntol With Q. II. b'nltn. mud worried several
he laid Ii crnis al cae Of at.s rar III. i, July, lor
II Or Il rpn!B tIlp dollar lie ace,E nwhu At
to5ncy for rarksns wien hc was Assignee.
~ 9 iss,st rrt hs R'sy ot rt
Iy roll II 10 Suiih for slight alisailcc.
J. r. COATES,
A.sgnce Of tho National Loan i Trust Company WIS
maess .sa IT, "i + hooas IL III
Etatlng that the Individual cdRer nn journal covering
s 'xr int 4 se Tsrs ha IL 5 M 10 T. e Sas
with thr Htate 1nsurunre Company, but FUND nc.
counts Will Feycsul of the ltfcsdantr. The wis1.cas
then asked to turn 10 tls account Of q. W. Me-
Mu!len in individual ledger No. !. Ho read The rari-
o'a ien,. 'l,ow!s !nat ,lsMas., hal snj9yet large
ti.a inss.inR h..str oi it3l lie ale lie iii. nj.
IT, te y sn,,, 9 Y " s 1s'n y, q k y FT IT,
nlsh Il Co., Jamca Yam 1wagrn. anil II. A.. 1nr!but.
THIS scscrs! acEonnts vera critically examined Tho
wltncna nnaing illat In tho accontlt Ut hs latter
named there wus iii eraa.src. lie did MT have Tho
corresponding 'juurnai" hcncs could no: Explain the
al .uo bnna. Ledger No. was then auh]ectrd tn a
Hse examination, hut without citstsitH Any material
Information. lie found by the 1eokA that tho Aaasneo
& sis7,'so "S ""'' 8"'''1D'' '''''a' '"'a '1' 'A
Witness then detailed Ills AnpB nf tbs bo1sn sInce
they camu iuto his lossca'io'' II was ,aalossiiio
course of nu,n1'ers Il appeared tlat ucrsrai
L"lgcr aud 1ndt,:Ltal I.e1E.r No. wrre nlt<s,s.
r aa e r axSf e1e 70 M aa .s
tile erasurcs. Wien ap1 0ntc Assignee llnr1hut,
nothing of vs1ne yas Turned nTer to him cycept TIM
h3os lis foMnl nothing o tho ooks to Iutr1se tl.at
tlr defendants hE .lvi1e.t The alleged profit from e
rnrei.:tn Ut ptticits, etc.
ea,,eo, t, tho st,to Insurance Company. There was
1IEx1,y T. MURRAY
WIS tlh next rincys. lie DtErupnndlnG clerk In
llo National L1an Rtl Trust Company brf1re TIM fire,
und aterwar1 .nads ssn:rant triler. The wnefa wan
acso"n, ] t' II q. 9. ia trn.. ~ ~, d Sic set @ 10
thr!r credit sa,6A.t5. Ledger M. was turned 10.
aftl IN tho accnlln. Of hs .;,ue Insurance Company
similar credit arrcsEr'!; Ths twa br'ks w'rs t9en
lnrans. The wilnr.s lrhrucl If tlsr Mitsna lolgcr
wl!le 1t the 1,aul, a tRttr'lcch to look for Il.
lie did not know anything of the Iank 1rohtin9 hy
rarela.iug rosles of sle State Company. or OF tic
defendant. dividing such profits.
ttoss-+ranisef: lie foumi talancn to lilo credit
OF @. c. Smith h ny.. In ledger M. of Sat5to9i,
wuich wen earrlcd forward to the crslIt of tp State
Insurance Comrany. lie dill hot know why thr credit
hail been n,atlc Tln "in, rssmcnt y nl,a "stllS
ccyaL}e accounts ehowh tun witness. lie could
nut cunuect she account with tho s!ato Insurance
Cdlnllny III al,y way. -.....
then rcud, hf.cr which the Court adjourned Until to-
nlnrFasy morning.
Tue AssIrnce II the National Loan anil Trust Com
tany tie llk. boostA"perst nftd snotlscr 1atcla ri
tooks, Will hp she objects Of inquiry ut tho xeaasem
Ling Of tha Court.