, 1875-01-14

commlsstoners 10 tha cont Of improvements In
In tho matter Of The estate ot ju,tns Bchafer
annMnl 1etonlt was approved;
pss ' rss s sn III. f, M ca kFn,e shn
tinued, and ncv bos ' ha frd forthwith.
| CRIMINAL. COURT.
John Cuhbert. tried for h,trgnrousty entering the
rca'lence Of Charles Hohcrss. nnd stealing ewery;
verdict guilty and tern, os p1nshnent fixed 1t n-
Taddeas T. aseyy sre, s sor hnrsiarioas, entering
the pretnses Of Alfred Kirk, and stealing jewer{ ya
nss q ! SS Il sna s1 q .a t
years. Casey WAS also under another indictment for
sdnEft r9 aasnE - ~ ,'ta II a y a
'as p"'e9 ct"~ Nv ras TIED eers s conr .ao
irom IT, g. and join iraeief. II Il nprs.rins m ii s tha.
Grow, WIN i 1u!te boy wa. IN ths erloy of JOHN
whs taken by way ofrspttsa! the Court suspended seu-
te1re. and t,sn.rgea him for ths time Icing.
Tbs premises Of f1rs,rgc Lord Jr, .i stcalinv rloe
5 Ss N ho r. ss IN se ses n'e' "
TIE GALL.
tUDaE fLoDaETT-trhn criminal dorl1tt
JnnoE dAhrSo to &c, except 81. IS, 50, o. g., oo,
Jrnos s1p1xr-lsa to 2o9.
Junar 1,ooErs-32o 10 $40,
JCpuE B,oru-2d2, 20s 10 275.
.IrpnE Tnen-14a Z IS, l5o, Isl, ,os to 1855.
IupoE fAnwELl-s2l to aao.
Uf1rED STATES Ct1rt',r Couar-JUDoE DLoDnErr
~ D. Harvey VI. Thomas fnbrecht nnd Jens Krohn,
ss1:3ai!-'hn s1s,fis ''s'f' vs. The Town Of Anb"y'
surEEfoh r-CosyEsaross-Jsmes Drovslec
vs; MILAN volm"th, s'a7.19
!l.5aS;a.I5. 6; hIsUorI = 4. =; Andrew J: pef,
a1sstss. siaas5ohu ~ is1ssy W y. join shat
tai2das aud 'ootInn far new e." ii tral. L. N '''''
JupGg s1nL1r-doorse O. Couk Ct al. VI. E. W ,gar-
rssn ss9:ss, Ts3 .nf, Ia
fisi4w!liiam i!ar Ct =. ~ rster !. oossnoii iii and
C1Rou1r dounr-Ippas RooEHs-Dan.el 1IcSulty
vs. D. G. stIain and ?. II. Ford; verdict. $780, and
notfnn not for now triaa.-s. EnRctt ~. Lambert biur
JUDGE Iooru--Ado1ph 1roltz vs. Peter Mayer, 500.
JunaE TnEE-1 y. lloyd Va. o. D. Bansum and
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT.
I 4ss Ght'1s es@n: 1ss business
= Taet, .,ne!es!isi. &C.. r Downing; appeal from
1o7 Vanscoy Ct a. vs. Mnlcs; appeal from Mclean;
molten as to b!ll of exceptions Withdrawn By aereo
H. icopo '',s e1 rc L. D. A. Railroad Company vs.
oldtowu, Mclean County; petition for mandamus !;
motion for further Tins allowed.
peal from s4ngatnon; same order. ..,.
tion for further tituo 10 Ole briefs.
2sO. Wilson ek III. Vs. Fletcher h NIcCorry; Rppcal
$50. Yoak1tn VI, Harrison et H.; appeal from Me-
nrrd dismissed without damtgea.
A. Mullins % " Tsn ~ re9r!e. @ ETC.; error to Meultris
H. Stowe vs. Hodges !: appeal from Adams motion
by appellant Ia renew judgment.
25i Smith ys. burton; appeal from Adams; motion
to dis,nlss for vant 81 prosecution.
a. appeal from cnss; motion te oonsodats agreed ia
motion 10 dsm.s BY agreement At defendants costs
81. Ncao The People, etc. error to Scott; auh
mitted on printed briefs.
Call OF tho docket:
ii. Ross W. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy nallroad
Company ct w.; appeal from peoria; argued orally by
w. Tuck. tmpleadcd, ETC., VS.. Downing; appeal from
~. Herman et nl VI. Cunningham et al; error to
II. quincy Kailroat Bridge Company rs. City Of
0ans aas % FsoD ss ssses ss to ous
40. Gilman, Clinton 4 Springfield Railroad Company
~ 1ean' etc.. OF al; appeal from sanganon; taken
q: PITT st al Va. swo,rins'n; srror 10 Champaign
.s T4oa.pson y. Miller; ~ tnpeaasd, ato; s7oF to
pe% peo
80. Sans gs Dewitt County: petition for 'nanda-
81. Everett et Al. vs. crowacr; error TO Moultr.s
"a IIiaoes ct Va. Duhrock error to Cumberland
dAmissei
a. peaks VI. The People, etc.; error to Scott !;
passed error to Fulton taken after argument by tho
Il. Tho People, etc.: ::ve Rice ct H.. original suit
BaIine County passed.
b8 Ths People Vi. Laniger st nl. :; original suit /;
ClarE County passed. ...... -
H. Tho People VI. Langer ct a original suit Clark
County passed.
st. Baine noe ct A.. original suit saltne Coun-
ty; passed.
u.s. Same u. Houston et H.; original suit con-
| tinued.
ss city Of Springfield VI. Edwards: error 10 SAM
CANON; dismissed
Hall ct a. ". shurr q al error to Mclean taken
on call,
81 Rutherford ct a W. Morris ct A.. appeal from
Adams argued by Judge Lawrence and tho Hon. o.