The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-02-10

ner 70 the memory OF such man; he went TO me
scaIoi with Bible IN his hand Kissing II, and hu
soul went up TO God; no man could DC ashamee
for Carrying O banner Tor him.
q. How frequently did you during This pcrod o.
your acquain lance with Mrs. Woodruff go with mel
TO Coney Island2 A. recoleet going wifh hef
once, perhap s twice.
G. DID not you go more A. No, sir; thInH
Q. Are you certain you did not 90 more A. No.
sir; am not certain about anything
Q. And didn't you go boating II YOU did not 90
w mrs. aOS her Nn as
q. was that on sunday a. II don't remembers
O. We're those visits at Coney Island on sundays
A. My impression Is that they were on saturday;
l would not be certain. have been there on
sunday It might as well have been sunday as
q SO far as you were concerned Or sne' A. !
MIR. Evarts here suggested 1t was the hour fol-
recess.
The Judge-l wish to say that communication
has been handed up by q responsible person say.
Inc Inc those Who are now hereand one
person was heard to make remark in regard to
the case in the hearing o. the Jury tina, Is sne
stood that this H r71v WI prnsnacs Sc
persons, when any such thing occurs again. and
charge the oficer having that locality under ms
direction inat the jury must be enabled TO 20 otl
around and think 1t Is hard that SPECTATOR
should so far forget themselves and the respect
due to the jury as to indulge in any such observa
Mr.. Evarts- have observed, without making
any remark about 1T before, that sometimes spec
tators or auditors would lean over that rail, I'M
medlateiy behind the jury, and thus bring them
there should be as much space Cor visitors as pos.
slble yet seems to me the space behind the Jury
should be kept clear.
me Judge-It shall be so hereafter.
The Court then adjourned to two O'Clock.
AFTER RECESS
the foreman Of the jury protested against the I'm.
putation that was sought to be made by the letter
lore recess Being the first occasion on which the
jury made any motion TO speak, great curiosity
was shown by everybody TO hear what was offered.
The foreman made dgnifed and manly protest
in few words, and gave a favorable impression
OF his fellow jurymen.
The Judge-It may have arisen as On unjust 70.
Election on them. l am very glad to hear what the
foreman mas SAID.
The crosse Examination OF Theodore Triton was
then resumed by Mr.. Evarts.
MRS. TILTON's LETTER ON CATHERINE GAuNT.
book containing letters ana Statements was
sala this seems to me a reproduction OF Una
Catherine Gaunc letter; do not know whether
any omissions are made here; the whole letter
Was Autographed In the Graphic, believe; could
ia this print; 1 remember tnat the Catherine
Gaunt letter has never been printed correctly
epo have bsen
printed; think very lew OF the transcripts have
been put into the DOCK SHOWN mos Che Cdtnoriud
Grunt letter was given to the Gr1phtc ONCE 10
be hthographed; l cannot say tor certain that
everything was Autographed that was sent over
! know sent 1t over myself to be- hthograp led
think NUMBER OF letters that were sent were not
autographed; whether the Catnerne CANT" let.
leaves OF handwriting were here handed to
the wltness:l I recognize this as NJ Nave. Nave.
Gaunt letter; 1T appears to be copy Of is
or OF portion OF 1t; | don't know whether II
letter or OF part OF IL; don't know winch; 1t ca1
be easily compared with the original II 1t is here
| don't think these leaves purport to be whole
letter; don't see on them any marks, or aster'
isxs. or omissions OF any Kind; CONT see any.
letter. Is there anything a. all 10 Indicate that
this ia quoiatlon; my recollection is that IN tle
two was lett out, ana recoect sending IL over to
the graphic, where 1t was utnographed: my lm.
pne 81 the impressons RON the GRAPHIC ba win
not be certain; do not know whether there Is 9
me sworn Ss Hus statement nj was pusn ID msds
some little comparison between that aud I'D
original ana ioan t5 some t e o orrn,
IN the Catherine Gaunr letter, ouI do not ex'
actly know.
you as important or was 1t unimportant? A. l re-
member when my sworn statement was printed,
as It was printed without my authority and wit"
out my REVISION, feared there were many typo.
graphical errors ait; 1t was printed wita an omis
member some time alterward looking 10 see how
lar the documents had been incorrectly or cor
sr. Beecner's letter OF the LIST Jan airy; 1t SAID,
'other breasts would acne" instead OF "othe1
hearts," and there was another error OF WOrdi
and nv Impression is there was some omission IN
the Catherine Gaunt letter and one or two other
letters, and sent to the Graphic ONCE to nave II
produced.
q. / repeat my question When You saw an
omission, II you did see It, in the print OF the
CATHERINE Gauut letter. as compared with the
Original, did the omission strike yol as imporant
or only unlmportantr
Mr.. Beach-Tne witness does not sate positively
that he any omission In the letter.
Witness-I don't remember any, particularly
Mr.. Evarts to witness-whar do you say about
that?
ing that there was an omission In the Catherin'
WitpessGi think there was sentence or so er
Tne Judge-1he question is now whether that ii
important or not.
Witness 10 what end9
The Judge-Any EMU
Mr.. Evarts-lhe truth-fulness OF the publica-
Witness-No, sir; my recollection is there was
something about the renewal OF the marriage
MIR. Evarts-We will see the difference.
MIR. Beacn-Well ! object to his introdnclngit
The paper Will show for Itself.
MT. Evarts (readlng)-
scHouARIE, June 20. 1871.
NY DEAR TuEopoRE:-
Mr.. Tlton-I never had OCCASION Mr.. Evarts,
compare 1t with the prlntmt OF THIS BOOK bni
with ;he printing in the Argus newspaper.
Mr.. Evarts-Wcil we have gos 1t mere as 1t wa
originally written. [Readlng.l
ScnonARIE. June 20 1871.
My DEAR rHEopoRE-ro-day, through the ministry o
Catherine GaunL character OF hcton, eyes have
been opened Tor the nrs time in my experience SO th
see clearly IL was when knew that wal
loved 10 suffer it to grow passion vlrtuous Womdn
eesa &c e ii n h pi h o S1s
and received could hlrm no one. not even you,
liza believed altrnly un Ill tour O'CLOCK this alter
noon. when the heavenly vision Iawned upon me sec
now, before, the wrong have cone you, aho
hasten Immediately to ask your pardo0, with penn
tcnce sincere that henccfort or reas remains you
may trus. implicit OH my dear iheotore your
opinions not resiiu or congena TO my soul yet my
integrity ana purity are sacred AM hoy ming %
bie God with me tor Catherin & aunt ana ior an
leadngs OF an aiiwse and loving Providence Yes
now quite PREPARED TO renew marriage vow
with you to keep the saviour requlrcth who look
eth at the eye ND the heart Never before could sly
this When you yearn toward me with true feelng %
assured OF the tried purified ana restored love OF -
Mr. Evarts-l now come to the part that Is omit
ted.
Counsel for plalntir objected Mr.. Beach statin9
that IL was Improper to make any such remark Ia
] The Jury. there helng no eYlQenca