New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-06-23

was further separated from the room OF MI drec'cy
when se was taken that Of Mr. Tlton which was inc
next room to Mr.. Greeloys Well. 10 turns ou'' soo
men, that Mr.. Greeley not there then ina. "o"u
have made her story little moro probable; but
an error into which she fell And there arc olsht ais
tnct nromnant facts upon which she contradcts tho
Abatement she gave before tho Examining Committee,
and Wedges the contradiction She pretcnds n''
she was but ten minutes In conference WIN ',''
Tracy Mr.. Tracy testihes that 1t was an IN
terview OF an hour. and Mr. Moulton eniarsos
It to two hours. But I don't care 70 pursue
IT. and have been betrayed into longer comment upon
It than Intended can well SEQ how disposition ike
tbs Young lady, a vivid and creative fancy-and IL my
friends will permit their word-a lady VINO de
yelops amazingly upon the stand theatric turh ay
In tendency 10 oxaggcfate, In tho prhrehey Oh no
imagination and descriptive power, describe ny words as
extravagan,y sho does by action don't care 10 I'M
putc to her designed misrepresentation Nor Will Will
nply do IL against anybody that she has exagger
ated and overdrawn tho picture. Ia very apparent ]"
seems to me- tho extravaganza and righteousness
OF her narrative we'll from her manner ana DC
meanor upon the stand.
But there Is thing gentlcmen she reveals which
important and that Is that rs early rs Decem
Der H. 1870 Mr.. Ton did make tho charge OF adultery
against his wife, and that that day. although Bessie
Turner denies Mrs. Bradshaw swears that Bessie Iur
ner communicated that fact to her. Well, what becomes
then the idea of conspiracy. our friends sayngMr
Tracy saying in his opening That tho conspiracy ot"u
from the 26th December 1S70-Mr Tracy contending
that In his intercourse with Tlton and Mouton, ana
Woodruff the idea OF adultery never sped that IL
was improper solicitations but yet Bessie Turner ther
own witness revealing that carly tho 14th Oh DC
cember before the date Of the conspiracy before the
interviews with Tracy the charge OF adultery was made
Well don't care to comment on the evidence OF Mr.
southwick Admit 1t to be all true, and you cannot per
ceye any relaon-mporant reaton-itha to any Issue
In this case Everything may have transpired just as MT
southwick relates and yet Mr. Beecher have committed
the offense with which he is charged.
Mr. Schultz also, whose recollection clearly does not
accord with that Of Mr. Woodruff in twQ.particulars-
Mr. Schultz imagines that after Tilton and Wood
ruff called at his house Mr.. Woodruff lett
was not present at the interview; whereas Tilton
and Woodruff both testify that he was there at the
whole Interview and although Mr.. Schultz admits that
Mr. Tton said enough convey to him the possible idea
that Mr. Tton would accept any benefits or advan-
tages the hands of Mr.. Beecher. yet Mr. Tton and
Mr. Woodruff both testify that Mr. Tlton was outspoken
upon that subject and utterly reused-appyng then to
Mr. Schultz aid in regard to The Golden Age-uttery
refused any cooperation association tho part OF
Mr. Beecher. And so might run through. gentlemen,
this proof But will leave 1t.