, 1875-10-11

alright ot the keepers So otbsr. msotin, II IT, ~
! Il Lnks Ind mentioned tho fa.s, ,ur,es,! nf Mat.
ssi ss "I' is .a,s '", oot oa0ss !, 'Hts :to haze
f.tvos ~ slparnns growth aud a
.r.n.'ormAsson sccornoany,ag tie growth, ~
ma.k 'i., taSa thtfo "aa young ! = IN lt,o
sstu'e,,'o. s.t vs,tt."s A. ts' f'sLt y vh.e
ttIoj IN shining ca1mcnte.--Lul t~.v,, /.
hlstsha"A account VI The ango' g.; Of, I'll.
st'nc. anu all that PERTAINS to = Ii rlake.
II 10 Ge uldel ntotl a. referi' = What IN /
tAson tla:e boiusa tue ,noE =: ct.cd .Lo
soru'chte. 3ntse Boo;hn { : euen. i,
have not a'~.Ya method ( arrangement
!le probabilities u Tie case : ing that ,lo Ia
addtets OF thG nuRel. IN ro IN Na,lbey
"as g.sen 10 tie woman Il. was IN tue
fenichto. Tho ktAtcmaut u. cAso wuu1l 10,
HAT al lhe ninesaea testify tia, t,ue angol nns
Present, aud rofne of them thst twu were p:cs-
eht; C1uid any nAa frum such esitetc, con.
Guide sll1t no angel WA PRESENT. A tar e1-
MAna;son nauii nc lint QUO. Of tho
nes netsts say that ono, angel only was present
!he iatssuaEa Of tue witnesses tcs1iftlny
10 the itt-eHco Ut ouo il uot therefore
eseIi se. ahd IA not conra:lic.orv Of the Btasu-
,ha nsen. " sh4s t"o we're pfesout. Tue language Of
3ne angels 70 tbe wosnon 10 dlvs1Ac. Ju1go
Hoth ta's. TIE; Mathoa. Ms.k, mad LuHo
give onefent vereinns. tut ill tostlfy t.pBL thov
sh3' ne is rnt o'e. itc!s ristu." Remembering
fratuenssry. And TIA. each LyaugsI;s. uoes uvs
ao1ess 10 give ~! Tue Eattcn!xra, It il right 10
hufm that thov do no. cu,tra1,cl c.c:, ot.lrr,
s, ~ to plAces OF apl'eafauca. Lulea H.osh
d"cl's Il, on tue fart tAa. tile iAcu interview.
Accor71nR to lst.LnS. "ax III Gat,lce. AID ma
utl2r place in mcuit Jicd by hin; A,cur.t,nu tn
Lukn i wa 4: JcrlaA!- III Aad no u, on In,
1aes tnat, UPON tao evening Of the d.v Il il.s
Icau Ftetlop. ilo ap. cared t1 f1!n Uis..pias III
Jerusalem. lie appeared in bot, ra:ss:
| In 'crusa EN- twiee, oHcc uhcu TLx,n,s
vas absent. ail ouoo when lie was proacut, .,es
Ma;S' 1.'., I'LL; Lnko. XIV. ss-is: join. H.,
lv-25- Again. remembering Jnl:e Eoo:u's e,l-
mission Of waht Vt chronological uldaf iu Tho
leco.d> kod tlie partial ACCOUNT given il crch
| one, aak. Due, Matthew con:rASt,cs A|nrx, sad
Luke. A1'i Joio When they sAv Cas'at ii polrei
- Je.u6aleuf Celtainlv not. Tho at, ca. A,lc9
| in Jcrusalc'1 Vas - tie eloven ouiF. TIE a;,-
pcatabce IN Gall Ge. fiTm1. Iy ann 1uneod hT tua
angels aud by the Savior. was 10 bo uIio to
III" Disciples iu gcussa'. Johu nazratea the ~.
x1L LA. No otbers snautiuu II; no others
contradict It. The mee:lug III Gafil.e to which
Matthew refers took aco. 1t was al appointed
n.ona Mste aa9y =; p.n DS'' n ns ~
aloos 10 rs'ato I hi. iss,. 80, nAo = con. con.
| tcesedl5 ra. not presenti" do nos
knoT, on :; eT;snt ;;r on tho .tnsnons. p Jus.o
| oFdt. Mattho" Says: Tho eleven we,t away
into Gahlee INTO nlouutA'n, wLe.e Jesus had
| appointed i1eI1. And whom thsv san Him tAey
sI1'bn:S but aos s's mo- d9a1sd }}uase pSot
did they doubtf Why did they d ,ult? II tic
caosen Disciples doubted What they saw
with the.r own eyes, A. tt.ted by this
writer. may not nc be pa,don.d for doubt p
cannot ansuor tic questions Who7 What !: and
"nyf On account OF tho rcc~st'a benz only fgns:-
montarr. i dueA u0t seon probable HAT au, of
tue eleven doub:ei' Tor thoy had received con.
v!nelng proof Of Chs.ss's resurrection. Aud, of
cou1sc. when thar (the eleveu "a. Him aud wor-
hGlped Him. ihas could not 1ouut and bolieye IN
Hiu. 1t tic same s,e. Tue fa.s Inference IL shat
gr.a. multitude gathered koResues. kni nauY
of tho Disciples, In Galeo Hlo bud
seen Jesus lor sho first tlln- wcre present,
HaAt mols probable than that thoy should queg-
t!oU mud doubt At hsst? II thus were tho caae
Paul Msn. y supplies wl.a. the oth.ra have omit
ted. and males u statement Of 4 fact 10 com-
| monty known 1t tho tiule that nobody cyet con-
lIa1.cttd it,
1ho appearance to Ja,ocE mentioned by Paul
does nut contradict tho btatcmsuts Il
to tho Gs1ose',,t' ou Jane. va pfoosbly
| reasnos tho inlorvleN may have heoD granted
Will reference to tue two accoun.a given bY
Luke, may ray that in tho Acts Of tho Anost!en
le makes additional statenenta, not crnsrad.c-
tory statements. Campato Luke xiv, 49-5i.
aud Acts it Ill. Whist to narrated Ia tho
Gospci n bret ho hhe uarsatsd more fully in tho
I Acta- Dus does JuIge uoosit suppose that any
or al OF tho E'augel,sts eosother hnvo narrastd
That wuut bo to tly III tue lac Of hiB naeuMp-
tons ns tho outset .! his Iccule.
JulEe Both ntsemptt to thrtw discredit upon
Paul because the Apostle sEelks OF the appear-
auco to Tho twelso Iussead Of to the eleyoH. It
WAS popular way Of speaking. Lukn savR-
XIV. o." Tho eleven wore gatuerod ,ogethar,"
though tLeEe were uul{ ton troseut. Wnen Ia ii
wr"tc, Matthias having boon e.ectod to round
out rho nutnb4r, Tho nrosk!vs wota called tun
twelve. Dues judge loVtt suppose tho Cur
luthIaus u'BuudtrstuoI Inu!?
Ia reteruuca 70 tho alleged discrepancies be-
twoel. tho two accolnts Of l'suis cunycrsion,
mention Cd BY julae Doo.h II we oons.dar that
the tucn wi,o io-rGeyol with Paul weso imlno-
dlately H:nltten u tle ground, betore the voice
b+axe to them. Walch Aeis 1xFI., II. conveys,
aud that tho nartatiEe in Acts t., I. refers
to what occurred attcrsnrjs, sAoio Ia no
dtfhuulty. As TO tha tutI.cs matter OF two
ACCOUNTS, Oh the rrnc1l'ios laid down by
JujEe Uooth h'inscf, No nro not TO suppose
| that fun accouut mas given either by Luke Or
BY Paul lunae!f. Or by boLl. Dut that t,clu ID l.
contradiction, jnd.o Dooth cAunot a-.sest.
Thus rapids havc touched tho sa!,out points
Of Judge lt'otA's lecture. lie has no:
ilmpeac1ed ~. tue honesty o. ability Of
20 bo based upon oral communications
| flom others os from. documents wrtteu soon
| sitter the deatn Of Christ. and further admitting
| that Marx ~lo:o hs GOSPEL largely tr1n' tLe rb-
] 10 be Gtyeu to their testimony. for lnty wrote
| wnilo tho actual witnesses were q iyo aud wlno
Tue whos Country wan astir respoStux the l!fs.
oca1n hnd rosuisectou OF Chrlss. h"t
ststemor.s. f~o Of the writer's wore eye-wit-
uessas. Not \ auEle Statement Of theirs is con.
ttaIctcd 6y tho oLler blstos'ans. II saa llfe of
Christ 1nh1s such btnpanJous tHshttssau I'll
tue tnuus af tuass rude ua.!iean pcaean a. 80
did tue death aud tha RESURRECTION Of ths same
| dtviue bs.ug. Tho Resurrection MAJ thh'r
rId fals&