, 1875-11-04
sue etc., at Tad cloud Agency for the 4tll oi de-
toor 1874. the following IL lia otate'nHnt Ut !ho

pS'i H!'bAh'
f"rhrt4 rra,.
On hhn!. 1"r lat rr'r. ~ -
Ilse!r-h ts'un ". A, s,il3
Total. .-.+'......s.....';.itE.!!
ta%.,i to }n'itanh. 80
tRanel to efntinyus. ......... ............. 7,t9l
Total .3,l1B.9l7
These :cLurIs arn on flo in thu Indian Ihreals.
and. Al llayo pontoi out, Here III tile hands uf
ths Commission. Thoy 1Laistt therefore. liave
knonn tue thoory on which they n,tloaYnfod to
dls1'rnva Prof, atarsti's charges TaH wltlintt
ho aeen that Havil'c charges tho whole lot ~
Issued. In otlirr words. Aayfltn cfag gea tho In
dlntia With receving 12s more benyed than this
Commission kaya In cnl'i t,lvc had.
Having thus HltDlqn that tho return Of beef Ia
fraudulent. from tho unanimous trasinlonY of
tho Commissioners, and, to NHn their own asTe
OF argnmon., tho "poHaaility" OF fraud boing
committed, IL Will bo vol to lonIs At the other
Testimony In tho possession Of tho Commission,
or accessible to tcn,, bearing Gu tic characters
0l HayIllo ami Hoaler.
1,cgnrdine HavllIc they lied bctprc them record
evidence tint tlo had rR,el fraudulent vohrhers
70. or In Tho nntnc Of, alcCann, nt two diI1oront
times. moro than voar ,ntetyon1nC that ln
Ind frnntlulcntlS kept relative on tao 70 Is pf
hlh Agency WIN WaH not at tho Agency, atit thar
no Ind given At least onH corrupt contract to
smother relative. Tney had bnforo tlsons my ro-
port, III which l showed that Savfllo Ind glyon
receipt for cattle nat received at any ttase. md
stntonnMt which proves that ic had before Eiysn
T. receipt Tor ratle, allowing larger average
than ho actually rocoiycti.
They lad evidence that Doeer Ind been mixed
up II, dthrol>utabio transactions with I!ItliaI,
officials, and positive proof thnt he clatnet! and
raceyc1 lilo pavnlonts for tho na,o lot 1T cattle,
under crellmHtaneea Which preclulcd lilo posst-
blllty Of bin Innocence.
Thoro vas. therefore,. possibility that aayilfo
and Bosfor might connivo at frauds. and worry
Atrong testimony that tho cattle delivered At Rcd
Cloud Agency could nut have hoon 40 weiKhty M
waB claimed by tho Agent aud contractor. AL
tlls testimony Of disnterrHtea persons, army
ofncots hnt btllotH, vas againHt tho probability,
or even possibility, Of tie wtloo years. delivery
At 1icd Cloud AEency beiug Of the GyesaEc
weight3 represented. but tho GoIDmlBslon
ignored tiio probabilities aga1IHt BoAior and
Sayio, aud adopted tho possibilities in tlloir
favor, while snppresslng facts that would crisl-
innte tho whole tot aud oveu going far ~ to
caat doubt upon tAo testimony OF Bishop Hare
aud Prof. Marsh whore 1t dItfo.od with tnnL OF
hHent Sayilie. But Bishop Hnre and Prof.
Marsh lad notes Of tho convoraaton in wllicl,
Sayil(o slated Tint tho weight Of tho cattle
which llo certified AZ being 1.1f1 was only so
pounds, and ut coutHe, tlleso natca, takcn on tho
spot, are moro vs1nablo rs evidence than tho
n1uro opinion OF tho Commissioners, cgon II The
record in tho caao slloWel far dlIcrent disposi-
tiou on tho lart OF tho latter.
Thnro IN much nora that cnn ho aaa on this
eubject, but have shown that tho ComMlssion
proving fraud both in snviilos Official retutua
and tho beef deliveries that Savslio'a rctnruA
were fraudulent on proTeu by the Commissioners
themselves IN tier unanimous report. nnd That.
therefore, their cainlH Of inAocrnco for Eayilio
aud DoHler aro abgurl. SAMUEL WALExR.