, 1875-03-25

40 Thinks Ills Client Has Dono Moth.
ing Criminal.
1u1ro Williams viii Giro Ills Decision
Monday.


aB usual, Biucc this cas0 c0M9nbhcct1' sHahS "s
tendance Of spectators. Tho evcnt OF tho morn
INK NAB the delivery OF tho concluding speecn
lor the defendant by Mr. Writ Uexlo1' 1n7
speech WAS on tho motion for . wsS III ast~ea-
mont tLs auawcr in writing not bclng saiAeloas' |
to bring Wilbur +. Storey into court
UNDER WHICH KiSa
co,, ntc,tv. Tor tito respondent inquired Of |
tho Cont gl,ethor IT waa yot known what Judge
,vou,d nrr.fdo ut tue aession Of Court during |
nftci lilo several indictments against Mr. 8toroy
would DO tried.
JutIco williams eatd that lie did not know, but
rndersood that judge Dooth wonia hold tho
next term OF tho Criminal Court. lilo was mt
nfIiclal1y Informed Of this but know It waa tho
understanding.
Col. ntcaby inquired wi,ethor tho s..t!ngs OF
Juleo Dooth would extend through tho next
threo months.
Judge Williams thought that such would be tho
cano.
COL nlcaby waa understood to rcaaark that
there wcre several important Witnesses out OF
torn, who could possibly not got hero BY next
Tuesday That was the day flxcd for tho trial,
and ue lopcd alr. need would withdraw tue not!-
tlcation.
Mr. Reed said that ln did not want to haTo
tlla oaBca 60 oyor for three months. Ihe Judges
would moot saturday to docao who should hold
.no n,,t +.rr NJ Cot1rt lie thought tho nI-
...,oa.,on. ,,,dc ot tt,t ,nnetlnp would provo
satisfactory to alt concerned.
Mr. Cloudy did not suppose that any OF tho
Judccs would be particularly dosfrouH Of trying
'aq qae s1ao' 'atns 9-ooa with Mr. oudv So far
ss ],e hltnsoIf was concerned, he would mako no
Goramblo for tho job. IIo supposed there would
bn :, T., ,ee restlv Ia trv the c290 Wnonsrct both
,,.r,,ss warn rcot1v.
~ pas,.a,', .;,,+ Tim not;co of trial Yor Tu.s-
day would relnasn unchanged.
4 PERSONAL QuEBr1os.
Tbo ltbol caso uaa no1t iu order and Mr. Writ
ror.o- -. ohout Ia commonco hin oratlou, but
was insoFruptod " mr. uoaay VINO "lsaoa 70
seasa seod M lin a uuinsontona'ly on o preceding day.
In the f,rst p1ace, ho {alr. douay> denied hayiug
intcndca 10 eaBs any Hspe'h'oA "Aa'o'es 'A 'p'
character OF tho Court.
a1r. Reed aail that he did not intend 10 mis-
rcnrssent vha. Tho eep.en.un l,ad said. pcsaxps
,to,31 In t,,u, u, ,,,, ,,ot IN reyivo Tho dsc,s.
~ "'o'o W '"1' ~ '"'' "'~~N'
lion.
Mr. Dexter then said that 1t was ILLS intention
to mako brict addrosH. Perhaps forty minutes
m,, cs,,.. t,os;no1 ,rr r,ov+or ~ ,,r,oret. NJ,
4ae os"ss >'Ss1ss' ~, =, DoAsss " "s.e''a"""~
tint ho Aau no ucslro 10 5lmlE MS 9oMaIkbs
sin: DEXTER. ....
attaiu, aud ttan la'inched into h's subject. Ihis
WaA caso thnt required nlucA cafoinl eonsldo ra-
ton. Ihoy s1o"!a walK vefy eafeinily II taoy
rlsne% G1eMa t. so hs rcee.ded e the coMopts % 10 tic
13.les, Ae tNr Do3sor) aed that tue
written ansTer waa sutslclent, aad that no
contempt Of coM1t w. was, 1s msttar
of fact, lhtohucu. 1nGfo inlsnt w 'nsol4oa' III,
u.
etnro"oIeu to putinn pao tasto: Ho. sery
aefe"s tSss saoa % H. ~ tao siaG esIs 10
toto It. o 10 nG ha ns
sess Of ts rs coar sS'o & Jsieo II IN he conatltu-
tson tho right Ut tfoo, st'eoch On oil public rub,
tec:s was gusra,nIsoea; Msn %e5o oniy limited
70 ahnso ~ .n1n =, nrcsoExs a+ froo o
aud freq press: Why slonld an orator
10 a'ioMea TO expsess h's oP!aion 10
puh!o ncouus, ILL.,, anh III 1il' o'uscY etis!
oa.tos o. a. ns%snaGes, osS 20 aeea sne saao ssht
Win hs ~ rosasfsa IL ono man ,v naa asnt
to express nn orlnion aa Que wy, WY then ~
other man Lad right TO express Ing Same onin-
tea throusn soslo o'hef neaiatn. ilo hs!d aeas
rus moro aleaassi9t, neean'o 1seo' 'ne putos DO"
camo tue coursa u 1uat1eo. -
,., 1nEsa NY e;to VIZ Sn G11s ~ GS ~ ttpSd a fAHL
WlEh tao conapohIt.on Of trina Jury. II more
Was non. angln,a" .,npAhoteo' a' ao asso 'nceo
quite 90 illi,stslouy. Grand Jutles. l'Eo
able commont. Il tug editor d OF tho Times hon q
ostly believed thas eestnsn men comprised 10 the
Grand Jury were pot ut 70 hold tho position, he
had tho right. undor tile Constitution, to express
Ais oplnlon. Iho theory tlas usana Jnry was
not llabio to criticism. ~hlch appeared TO be leld
by some gentlomen Who haa spoken tor tue
persecution, uas a6anrd. snpposlng Grand
Jury was paeted WIZ bad mon would It be con-
tempt ot tho Crlm'nal Ioatt iof lug edltor M to
say so2 Iod,ng to such theory wonld be ia
rcduco American eitlzeus 10
GoSp1T1oH oY M MoRaL AL sEnrpoM.
to muzzlo tlctr press and alo" tho aYsnues OF
Iustice to be choked with corruption. Was that
Htnto OF things 10 be debtrodf Wna It state
pt tnsnGs shat tno looiHo' VIZ hete eupposGGu e
90 Tree peop!e' ~ Mon'u iooA uEoo "a!a1aca
70 thnusas noE: Iho GcnsoIsa'I o. tno Pscst
nattela o. the klno m!s1t. ao ~ soae tus'
a'en ,a,i o9nnisee e@s ra,.a cdna its noses samln
!oothoM ~ she tnsoo s1,t nta'Ss; -! ~
sontt couiu lnYaae 1ao nant 81 HGe
.pscch, o. tho froedom Ct tue p,oss un!oss a.
so!ntoly forced 70 protect tho aafnlniststloh q
Justice. inaoed. tbs states Attorney itad de
k4Icd th&t II QUO GrAQu jury Mtf9 EfletEl6GQ