davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
, 1875-05-28
Neinr ~PHan1snfDns.

antDai,tn R,ta Wteriur, Mts,raIttn vsu cables
Tttsdmtrttl
1s- Ulaa sso&tt b, ~fsls,ntsu G pmptpn,e, ntl.
DC F& tura S~tsrdnseu Der alsroaaunasUreaus az tt.
atu;
0srkspfans, innsrs pdmcrrbctbsn 9tutdnsrans rad
bsm 8spft, ldurr @titmad. utSsiit't, GctbttnHen,
mib.rntlsE sse.n Rstruna, @ttihi p"n usberruluns
sab 5&rtrt I'm Diaeta, 'dutts Nutitoetn, Auf- uns
Mbpss.n FER Wlasersrutt, S&piuhtt, ftntls urs
iGp.ts Utbntn. ptriiuduu8tr. }u'a'n ntnitrsdcn uns
Otfubl bee &rftd.ns btin rtseen, gbuabmt p,t Seb-
tsaft, t4part Yunttttn pstr LOs BIB tinss e Gtst.rt
ssr ssn Gueen, 6itber uut p%nrnpfr Stmtri I'm Epyft.
Wans,I an 6bPete, sslts SoTblns tst baut unb Ter
Eugen, Cd era tn Der Stite, III Ger Sruf unb ben Slit
bern. plSslih, euldat srn 5'se unt StsnHsn Ina 8lsii&.
aptniet 3 fen ron S1abrdp's ptitn seIrtiea has Ss-
esn ssn 40 ben a~tnanuttn StSrunsta.
@reiS 25 GeatS far bic &bahtel-
, 1875-05-28
vs!teraHaIsH

Ietkef ~heri.rtse, wel&er NIT Dpsrepfa tstaffet IN. fol
ttraual IA Is. bel .tnem lueuqti6eu Wlahie NIT ben, FAY
anbefsebaren @srldnsen ,u Nsen. paraf1 bell ~ aebnea
sne benap6 ourt bic 6ar6t bapcn aus9elbl0Hsn gu ietn
bat pdn 1enuHe iGne1 Wnb Fbn ~furdtbars S6mrssx
fpIsen. DD& ni&t anein hu pattsgt leteet, 70 aserR mt
tim aas hausasnoatu. ba IT .unmsr hhln eauRe. eets q.
vas ~ taosln Rnba. 90 saalt br DYspspttisr f4 ielba
arb ittns game nnsebuns, Die sladltts 3rbbltdfei
ItGiett wire etn, ~freaSlpit uns ben Vatttaten brtnst Sas
Depustfsta. bat bas stbea ibm cine eaa n unt felbf bh
Rd&fen ttn ntbeu. stdt ititsn CUR Dn;rstavas uns p
car iam StItansrbs. ab6 saram a.
, 1875-05-28

Yer 86ni9 pom 8 ri d a n )
lhetnt benz in Der Sammer aus 9ebrohenen
3erwiirfnlB ourd Die Serufuu9 etnes neuen
Winiteriums abbelfen su mouen. 3onou.
RIOTS, Der @eianote IN Yaris, 1T nod Ntben
bel6teben moroen.
, 1875-05-28
Wasmaa'e Nerfect Nnreat.Ue
wno teauiireuoe WiQeu,

bGats s.fA oaeio, iautu %tiastFas 1t fEt Sta fstiuns da,r
etsraas.n res Ms ems et eebu, bar Ftnatptib,, Ter
Eltren. Der otait Rtrpsn eteeu, & p'rtb, Q raSyfnne,
har,lehtststt, lAstrtdutthiIt, S%pspspWa. Wnerana, br
@aus @aa,nEebsr llutctsibseutpnexrs namcrrs0ibtn
xnb ale unsrbnG-esu in ben tnntren DrsaHtu. Rtxb
~fGsaattct ans iudt 6ei Rc poHtts tartgsS.
, 1875-05-28

Llhen3 aDaruns bic fGr.dIt&ta e&mtrsen s~usbslt&
ref6t bisft Rrdnitett NIT fiji brtnst. ptnn In BEN .,S6nN
bid Bitters" Elm 5eilmittsl sebpten ptrb. bas Seeer leih
eslans.n iann3 81 l.nbert ht e6msrJen tpfprt uub ID
.. ssftsttm @sbrau6t rirs eG patient prn Mo6e -
1Jpht I'D beHsr tefnbsn BE cine y1aRdnbi8e pttiung e.
sieIt In. xauftabe lesnsa bea Gag. an pil@ena ae sran.
tSt vsrhsn sislts rInstrbart Sdluata ~ sssrasasn
, 1875-05-28
Tieber unS faItss sEieher.

etssr sss GDsatihsbr fur so g,nts turtri. a
asshs itta 6silnittsI IN Der Wslt. sd@s Sisber sss
9eteitRshsr GnA aAs f~ssatssn ssrpGnbtta Rraa!bhltn.
9aasa-, 0AasIaA.. tsptbisss, stlbts xnl {snatat Si,hsT
Qsnsa lnrA NAssas's Vtata sbatssIfai nisbl (Ssff1
kstseHet 60 ~Hsstssss sasss nSIAsf' " esHs -
, 1875-05-28
"Star- Oftu" platform.

giIbcrsIani. cline grpAe 8ierbe. Gin psuRSnfieer
SGus untsr Osfen. Nraast In ~Gifenwnaren Sanbluu.
ssn mad. Gtrealayt sratis ~vsrisubst. @bstfRrsi
ss2Ssi' o. r. ~lettpih, o. -.
, 1875-05-28
@nGsA

E7airn, S&arIa&Heber entf.tea aus serbsrbenem DIute,
1esen bitfe arantbstteu Il .S6pebtim Bittsrs" tas ptrh
famas e&usmtttel, neil % Der bette 9latreini8er taa, sn
10 siebt. Gber plrb Der @ebrau4 IN fpdt Oher MID aenas
aa@ ba Nnntfuue bsecunen. 70 BAT gsden. Oialern,
6&arla@ftbn unb aabest NIT 8tsber Ssrbunbsat RraaE
petten ausbrs&en, eann mus her 9straI& fpfprt ttnA,
Sent perbtn, ba 8rartbettsu Ia btefea Stapium tae al.
stss Dsbaablass s%rfSrbra.
, 1875-05-28
Gcbmebif6 Sitters.
Rur anS 2rdutfrt 6ftss>


Rssr msbr ale pitrbunsat Sssrta es.ttdts eta strat
ks i6pepti&er ar,i Sd ben wtHsnf&afhi&sn trri@uhF
SIHt n faR cuf aatn 9bdIsa pr Gtet snfrQts, bic o.
ealtts. 5t4l,rsfi s.ptdr GrAuter nnb hu GTtrara btrffs
kz basa b &uptbefansttek ss
, 1875-05-28
Iabwdu II. @p.,

90 Warssn, Ode st .s@ Ctr. n. D.
qtt salISts NIB Ussrtc. eti3t sin, Hreinarit an
asbnas 4. o., So Daarr.u, Gdt &turh Cit, NeH
Foss. g~as!unf.. 9auisnbs ntrtt rtre Sbntn lusshAi ct.
, 1875-05-28

Etrtsrbenes 1lnt Ia bic 5austafs&t be- esfHtriiA sss
sab fpsar eItbafter Rranfhtttsa.
, 1875-05-28
Sautausf&l&ss.

slee.sa, 8tassa. ..SarA nssean~ ,astsassss 9rsss
astea.
, 1875-05-28
Rsrbaannssb

Der alaseH ta bic srss, Dsrfadtts be 85spsrs. pss
fea ebalt eas gauge Ssasm Nabrans uns 8raft. Wsus
sr Wiasen unb anoerr acknowledgement nn6lafen. tba
ss1s Gbatiaisis su enipideln mus Der sanss 8Srper Id
sea. Die 9ranttsttsn wel&t aus %seffprter Gtd,ietett bm
iserseaaassureant ~enrattsa, Rak seri&ieseuer art, aba
he Sausturlaas slebt tsnaer btefelbs. Dies IN bu
8rnnh, psbn sas rG&pspii@ Sttters. ea u ais GtGr.
nSaasattrd mtrft, BITE 0erhauuns spr8aa. reselt anb tbr
sdaahs Ebatiststt beraeut. 70 sttle Sra atbett.n beilt, ~
aaf&ttneas san, seFi@tsssasr Watar ens. aDtr usuneR
Aasrsss b~eisahsrs
E G*stasfudas
sab att enherea Experimentation ,ntH.ttH ebea 70 Of
aus etSrunssn Der WlaSsntbdti9tsit ais eurd ersli&
Anla8s 'b.r bsftiss Sriaitnns, Wena be Spsiie ni&
sstporis 0treauet uns ssr R5rgss IN 5cl0e eehsu aidt BIN.
lARsltt rndbrt plrs aug @bmaeeruns ein.reteu uni
e.; ssI$Dd$t: SYaem sFlisst ban ltt-tsfsa anfaa ,ina
gar ui&t IN Ss.ra&t iamG Die ~bsrabmt,fen Ne,,ts
Esaa IL 5dat sSa S&ptusiuhi in ben rfen Stabien IL.
esnpela. rittsn sbRs ausuabms TIRE Gafmsilamteit ~.
ga aaf ss 8tsaIi"uns bar gusanuHssorsang, bamit tt
Ssetlen seltt er pattsat "a flo utmnst. ibH nibt fru&t,
sts Sef&Tsrss serur fa6en uas ni4t pur& cen 80 yer 40
Yea AHh tbm sntmteer gar tetnl sber rn alyRtasa gaas
ntata nab t&ietts Rabtuas IN biestn.
, 1875-05-28
Railways READY RELIEF

ttat aussnbIiGli&s 5dlfs tstta BET,
&ntslnbuns her Yiisrsa. Der Blais unb Der &tnaswe,ss
&sxssaiOu Der eunss. HtrIiopasipsn. Ai$mAn0 sbtidwe.
ben. ptrisIppftn, 5pt,rts. grpup. Dsytbsrie' 9aiarrA,
$nEsnnie. Rppi(& msrt, 8abaSts. Rsusalsis, Rseumas
sisakus, 5rSftln. Utbitlhtbsr.
Dts Anwsnruns bs 8sase sslief ea ben, Isilfnbss
ssr .Itraattsn 4r.lls Mira %einseuai nab 0tTr,tssse
ss Hissls tsTssfutrss.
, 1875-05-28
90 xrsyfsu In siusm taltsu ylas Das.,

as6mpfe. &dwdd,e. 8er,sIspfsn. bofen Rssh
fGMers,. pereorbenen Masen, Diarr5se.
&urdbfan, Serfop flung, Sldbunasu
une allie inneren 2eiheu.
, 1875-05-28
Ssrft Das G&t. eds.SttS
Utffsrs StsS ausfalisblid bereitet sss
Deniel II. Co.,
A6o Gorb Drttts etross,

VA 80 p%uSittuta sr Ra@asmzHam zuh 9erus .
F6srn, y bic Nansnsunttrf&rit bs yslbsrsr sis,ribS
@us .Saatat S9osntns' iSsF alsi&4 " Gs -
SserauAssnEetiaass Ia rnsltfAss aHs ,eatfA,r epr.
kss 8Isf&s ~betstfnol ~ "~
YrsiS 70 &sRts ctns SlaInt, eos yfslAru a A.D
Elk sa sssteasu 465 Rsss brittt StssSs - = -
3sseA,sd sss SsstsssaR IN RasssnIatss G1sshn r.
..r-S
, 1875-05-28

HditAse fOattn nets stns RIaft, ssn Ratwdsy yf,a,y
Nslltt BET I'D fuer.n. Nosa'8s Ercpfsn In DaHtr psrsts
4gantbttt retr Sbmsrisn, BITE rem Wtt(l bss UaFsrS
e%sirabrea. s%prptusen. IS N ttTer ss frsn,Sa,& ~
Hssnbs Uesr Sttttss as eth R.t,mitttL. ~
, 1875-05-28

1sI1ts aastnbltSltd BIZ, ftlim n fsa S6meutn, G&naAs
sab Gntslaeuussn s~sisittst unb Gsue,Aipntn iurirt,
eItt&ptt Oh lie III Der 9anat. I'm Maetn, Giaesrtibsn
sbsr isnassn Oruisn pesr Orsansa Iisetn. hurA sia-
ualtee Gnptneune.
Sn ether biz spaa,ta Uliuutss. stnsrIa wts p,fts sl,s
~sstAissnb Der S@mtr. f,n mag, Der Nttu@attfhe, Set.
~Iassrtsc, S&wa@t. 8srirlsptltt, Wsrssi, an Stturaisie
Gsisenbs sbsr SrdEttlnps mire n
, 1875-05-28
Ola III lsttHnssnittsi.

perfumes. ssIas sts stritane abfaprsnssnttta ~,
taasltSt tS!sta tTesnl ttatr gri Daafaea leatsa .a,
tin %poatpnmes unf&allt&o ableituaasmtttI nah ~
Uereeu sbhI MSa9A. Gaf 'A"a
, 1875-05-28

ptThea sQRRea. ~ ~sss~l
, 1875-05-28

q ~ ssser nnsSnIee, sod aRtas mtRueftfA, @pA.
stsa axSiAItsSIi& stAtbt ass ~~
, 1875-05-28
G&DtasfuM


Y axs btt anslaGfettsatn &ranEpa.,H. ssrea sas 81
I@snssi@lt5tu ntsrmerfen Ia. aab leissn namsn.li6f al
asta earan- Die urlabsn, seldt ptsics iGrsdlits ~
etrseratsa, ane ptri1teesn spb p,siette ebe pti ~
nsnelaaaswett mus tmmn eteebt leta. H6mltd bic
sar4 StsrsHnssmittes sas Rtrrenisaem es 3 Ian
~asaeFSant ane eebar& hen santen RStpa a. t6 . a
Das rSGwtbti6 Sittert" aepi anerrel&t Ia ale y,dr.
i~uaesmtttd bd ben pbta ~ttrabntea Rranfbsttsn unS bal
2auisnesn BITE Ssfanebsti iay ~adssssbsn, Eelbe idpn "a.
tan %irstTsltrn. tc u'res' %eruS IN EN- III 6nesu.
RtessrsefGSIaaeTssit,
, 1875-05-28

$4,000 Gjolo Cir einsn sen sem %aIfbn,a.
9eamipniS Botanic Sdliam niht tnrirt. ghrpBe
6Iaiben 95 Gts, Snbnton 6OlIpDnpu II, 6 o.,
aesnten, pbha. 4gpl4aps
, 1875-05-28

FNa unbttlssus HranfbetsR Ras bic aesteintr1e Dsbouh
,nns stridssn lam ntemais ~ frab seaonnsr ptrSsn
gtaa gsaranSs Sss rSagsSti8 Stttrs" senau mad b,
ptre asrl8ptnpta. Dem patttnttn ptrs untebIsor 4
sa%safaaeIss Sslar sbstt iuridsss,bsu ans lsAss Ss fraatr
bttttrsstt fsat f& bale ntsstS din ~'""
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
AN INJUNCTION TO PREVENT THE DESTRUC
TON OF THE PAPERS.

Q. Now, Mr.. Tracy, do you remember period
and occasion when you considering. with others
with whom you conferred. as to getting an injunction to
prevent the destruction of these papcrsa A. lido
q. When was That
Mr.. Beach-What9 WHAT What is this. Sirf
Mr. Evarts-I ask him If he remembers occasion in
which he considered, in consultation with Others to
the propriey of getting an injunction to prevent the de-
struction OF these papersf
The Wtness-YOu asked me when IL wasi
Q. Yes. A. think it after Mrs. Ton's sworn
statement.
Q. Was made public A. Yes. Sir
@. Do you remember whether not it had any concur
renee with MI Moultons return from the Easti think
1t has been in evidence that he went to the East A. Well
Sir cannot remember whether it was his return or
about the time he going 1t was or about that
time; it was about the time that he refused followed
his refusal deliver the papers to Mr. Bcecher copies
OF them.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
WHY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL WITHDREW
OBJECTION TO THE TESTIMONY.

Mr.. Beach, did not suppose, Sir, that the
suggestion which made to give occasion for dis
cusson an address of this character do not propose
to follow it. Nor Is it necessary for me to present the
motives which induced 20 withdraw any possible OBJ
lection which we might have TO the competency OF this
lady as a witness. | shall not pursue the question
whether tho necessities OF the defendants case
would properly lead them 10 the consideration
Of the pr0priety of examining this lady;
nor shall consider Sir the other question whether hei
presentation witness In this case would lead to an
antagonsm productive of the results anticipated by the
learned counsel Very much might be said upon that
subject Sir as to how much OF the garment of respccta
bty left in the present condition and attitude OF this
family and as the responsibility rest where may for
producing these sad results. Those matters, Sir.
which do not TO allude to. though might possibly
answer with some force and perhaps emphasis, the sug
crstions OF the learned counsel may say Sir. that in
NV view of policy Of the law the counsel is entirely
mistaken in his construction both Of the legal intent OF
our legislation and OF the public in regard to the
propriey OF a woman being permitted TO defend herself
il she can under the circumstances in which Mrs Triton
l. placed In a former discussion, Sir, we alluded some
what and extensively TO The policy Of urrgs
aton upon that subject and think was very clearly
demonstrated TO your Honor that by the policy Of the
law il il now possible husband and wife compusory
TO be placed rs witnesses in In court OF justice,
I'm positive and direct and humliating antagonsm TO
each other II is not the policy OF the law Of State
to forbid that adverse position But do not propose.
Sir To discuss it, Ny only object was 10 announce to
vour Honor and 10 give 10 our learned friends the ben
eft OF the announcements that II they chose TO avail
themselves the Testimony Of this lady In this ease In
legitimate way our objection being withdrawn, and 10
present her testimony such a shape and before such
tribunal that could he examined and tested by the orl
nary rucs OF evidence and by ndrection before
other tribunal and another shape they at perfect
liberty to do
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
THE DEFENSE DECLINE TO CALL MRS. TIL
TON

Mr.. EvartS--Ihc question whether Mrs Ill
ton could he witness in this has never been an ac
tual question The law prohibits it the policy OF tho law
prohibits 1t the general sense of the wisdom OF that
policy prohibits it. There period during the prog
Of this when the Legislature OF the State
understood to DC considering whether the interests OF
ciey under the pr0yocat0n OF the Importance OF par
cua casc required that they should abrogae the rule
of law and abandon the policy of society. and open
the discOrds of husband and wife swearing
against one anohcr in court; and the Legislature
by an unanimous judgment as we must understandl.
and the of a the people of the STATE said
our law wisely aud firmly determines that question.
Now II Mrs. Tton at any time could legally have been
proposed and admitted a witness there would then
have been practical questions for us, counsel to
dotcrnine-graye AMI important questions, which have
never yet arisen for determination because the law
has scaled her lips in any litigation in which her husband
Is party Those two grave questions would have been
larst in sole relation of duty to our client. II we
thought his case. had presented it, had any such
defect in force of evidence that any other
needed then it would have been duty adduce such
evidence further, the law opened to We have now
no such opinion, and such view that needs
any more testimony than have given. II, however,
had come in the sole relation OF duty to our client to
dispose OF that practical question and the wife were
witness that the law permitted to be introduced then
should the grave duty OF determining whether some
nnry even some weakness that felt might need to be
supplied in our clients case should properly be sup
piled by this grave antagonsm tearing to pieces the
last shred Of responsibility and hope in the future for
this family. Fortunately we have not been brought by
any doubt or hesitation as and ulncss OF
defense into that grave moral question But your Honor
sees that these all hypothetical inquiries and To
which should not have alluded in the least but for the
introduction by our learned friend OF this proposition
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
q. And went or A. And went of.
GEN. TRACY'S SUGGESTIONS TO Ills ASSOCI
ATES.

ATES.
O. Mr.. Tracy, you have been asked about an
interview with Gen Butler. had at your lodgings; thai
was the lth wasn't ~ A. The tn oi July; yes Sir.
@. The | lth Of Julyi A. Oh the 1th OF August
O. The II tn Of August, 80 supposed; after the Fifth
Avenue interview of the 10th of August A. Yes, Sir.
O. The 9th WAS IL the 9thi A. The 9th of August, at
the Fifth Avenue.
O. You were asked something about Mr.. Beeohers be-
ing the house; Mr Beecher in any way party TO
that interviews A. Not at all. Sir.
@. Either by himself or by yOuf A. No, Sir
Mr. BeachWe that is calling Sir, for the conclusion
OF the witness. don't think it competent.
Mr. Evarts-Wcl, you did not represent Mr.. Beccher in
that interview A. No, Sir: did not represent him
Mr.. Bescl-That is a question of argument, resulting
from the proven facts In the case, Sir.
Mr. Evarts-I inferred that the object OF the inquiry
whether Mr. Beecher not in the house whether
it was matter OF his participation ITO the witness
And in regard the visit to the Fifth Avenue Hotel did
Mr. Beccher before that know anything OF IL A. No. Sir
O. Or OF any intent to have it, A. No, Sir
O. Mr. Tracy reference has been made in the examina
ton to the OF your having been counsel for Mssss
Woodruff & Robinson while Mr.. MoutOn was a member
OF that firm litigations Of theirs You such
counseif A. was counsel In one litigation for them
and in the Government matter which did not result In
litigation. technically speaking.
O. Well, Sir. you were their lawyerf A. ! was.
O. The usual professional relationsi A. Yes. Sir.
O. or client and counsel. and for compensation A..
Yes Sir. [Soac poceI Very modest too.
@. Now. Sir. you asked whether y0n made any
suggestions ~ the then crosse xaminng counsel Mr..
Porter when Mr.. MoutOn on the stand concerning
any Of the matters in which you counsel for them
Mr.. Beach-Oh. mol
Mr.. Evarts-Yes.
Mr.. Bcach-Oh, moi
Mr. Evarts-Ycs he was.
Mr.. Bcach-Oh. no.
Mr. Evars-He was. about this specific thing
Mr. Beach-The question put was whether, when Mr.
Porter was examining in regard to that Government di
cuy made any suggestion to Mr Porter and he said
not upon that subject
Mr. Eyarts-weil understand that to be the point.
when Mr. Porter was crosse xaminng Mr. MoultOn con
corning the Government matters whether Mr. Tracy did
not make him suggestions ut that point of the examna
ton.
Mr. Beach-Certainly did ask him, and he said no !"
Mr. Evarts-yery we'll; he said no. ITO the witness
Now Sir time in the conduct OF this case have you
ever made any suggestions given any inmatiOns
corning any examination or any introduction into this
cause OF those litigationsi A. have not Sir on the
contrary. have protested against II.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL CONSENT THAT MRS.
TILTON MAY TESTIFY.

Mr.. Beach-Wait one moment, II your Honor
please II your Honor please in the course OF this trial
much ausion has been made to the fact that Mrs TitOn
an incompetent witness by the rules OF evidence
and excluded from taking the wnessstsnd in regard
to subject matter which deeply affected her position
and interest We have deemed IL due Sir TO her. TO
selves. to the which represent To announce 10
your Honor and TO the counsel for the defense that
make no objection whatever to Mrs Tilton being pro-
duced by them witness, and that whatever obec-
lions might legally present against her competency
as witness we waive entirely and shallr question
IL friends upon the other side choose produce her
And may be permitted TO say, perhaps in addition
that Mrs Ton is incompetent witness very much in
the same with any other witness who is disqua
fed. disqualified before recent laws upon the
subject by interest and by relationship and that 1t
objection which may DO waived by the parties to the
litigation Your Honor will remember the phraseoOgy
Of the statute relating TO the competency OF husband
and wife witnesses when either Is party, and de-
carng that neither the the other shall be
petent cOmpelble to testify in certain and I'm
regard to certain transactions Isuppose Sir from the
language OF the statute, aud from the known practice
under the law declaring the disabilities OF wit
that 1t is matter which rests entirely In the dis
erection OF the parties to the litigation, except,
possibly, far it may be esteemed the policy
OF tho law to exclude the revelation Of confidential
communications; and suppose, and understand it to
be so nmatcd by the decisions, that even in regard to
those matters It Is entirely within the pleasure of the
parties the party the husband the wife, object
of the witness himself herself to object the
la.on OF those matters which are considered as
sacred to the domestic relation All wish to say. Sir
is that consent upon part that friends upon
the other side Mrs. Tilton witness In this
case il they choose.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
said about the destruction Of tho papers then I'm future
A. No, Sir.
q. Nothingt A. Nothing at all.
THE TALK ABOUT THE SHORT STATEMENT.

THE TALK ABOUT THE SHORT STATEMENT.
Q. Now, you have been asked something
about this short pspershort statement that has now
been read by the learned counsel. What occurred be-
tween you and Mr.. Mouton. anything. regarding that
statement A. At what interview Mr.. Evarts, do you
askf
@. At any interview concerning which you have been
inquired Of and have spoken In the crossi A. Well,
think the only interview have been inquired OF, or
spoken regard IN that paper, paper after Its ex
isence was the interview at Mr. Augustus storrss house
Just before 1t was delivered.
Mr. Evarts ITO Mr.. Beach THAT Ia iti
Mr. Beach-Yes; his answer entirely satisfactory
in regard to that.
Mr. Evsrts-NOw. how did any conversation arise
theref A. I don't think | can add anything 10 II.
O. You have said the wholei A. think have said the
whole with the permission OF counsel will say that MT
Mouton was expected before the Committee and he was
expected there with the other OF these statements
O. That is the long the shorti A. Or the short and
didn't know positively which he coming with until
he came When he came went out into the front paror
and saw him. and announced to what had been the
conclusion in the council at his house in the forenoon OF
that day. what result about what sort OF state
ment he has going to make.
O. And that was the first knowledge you had OF what
conclusion he carne to- A. IL was.
O. And you were grstiled at III A. was gratihed at
it, highly 80.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
TESTIMONY OF CHARLES C. STANLEY.

TESTIMUN1 UF CIfAKLES Z. SIANLEl,
Charles c. Stanley was called by plaintiff
and sworn.
Mr.. Morrs-Mr. Stanley, where do you reside A. No.
II Ralph-aye Brooklyn.
O. In Brookyni A. Brooklyn; yes, Sir.
O. And what is your business A. am journeyman
pocket-bOok maker.
Mr.. Eyarts-Mr. Stanley, WON'T you speak little
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
JUDGE NELSON APPROVES THE COURSE
OF THE DEFENSE.

Mr.. Evarts-But word, if your Honor
please presented in full, your Honor will rcmem-
ber my view OF the law and the policy Of the law on this
question: as presented by the situation when Mr. Tilton
was offered as Witness and do not propose to repeat
that In conclusion-conclusion upon my part mean
only need say that do not regard consent or stpu
Iatiop bet ween parties to the violation Of law which
excludes. grounds of public policy witness as
making him or her competent witness
Judge NelsonThe question here would be very differ
ent from that which presented when the competency
OF the plaintiff was under consideration.
Mr. Eyarts-Tbat understand.
Judge NclsonBecause we have here statute directed
10 the relation OF husband wife party to the ac
ton In an action OF this character have only 10 say,
that the question having been presented and the offer
having been made, and the learned counsel for the de
Tense thinking their duty to decline TO accept the sug
gestion confess feel gratfed that the lady Is not to
be called ITO the jury Gentlemen please prepare TO
retire.
The Court here took the usual recess until o'clock
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01

shan object to IT, sir-simpy the denial Of the fact
don't think 1t Ia competent
Mr. Evarts-That Is oil the redirect. ITO Mr. Beach
DO you wish TO examined
Mr. Beach-No, Sir.
Mr Eyarts-we rest, il your Honor please
Judge Nesonentlemen. will you get ready to retire
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01
THE DEFENSE RESTS.

Mr. Beach-Wait, wait
Judge NeilsOn-That answers II.
Mr. Evarts-I think he has a right TO say
Judge NeilsOn-I think 80.
Mr.. Bcach-wel brother lawyer on the stand.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01

REBUTTING TESTIMONYFOR THE PLAINTIFF.
After recess, at 2:10 o'clock, the taking of
the rebutting testimony in behalf OF the plaintiff be-
Tton took part in the procession In honor OF Rosse the
Communist.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-01

Bee Niatu Page.