New Orleans Republican., 1875-09-08
COURT RECORD.
TUESDAY,, SEPTEMBER Z, 1879,
Emperor District Court.

State of Louisiana VS.. Francois Frilot.-
Oa motion OF Ii, c. Dibble, Esq, Assistant
Attorney General, and on suggesting to the
court that the defendant, Francois Frilot,
has persstently and continuously violated
the injunction issued herein on the fifth da z
of July, A. d. 1875, notwithstanding the
supplemental writ of prohibition issued by
the Supreme Court, and served upon him
on the second day of August, 1875. limiting
and anuulling the writ of prohibition first
obtained by said Frilot and served upon the
Judge of this court and the Assistant At
torney General, on the twenty third
day of July, 1875; and upon fur
tfilot, has continuously, persistently
and wijlfully abused said SECOND and
supplemental writ of prohibition by
slaughtering animals for other persons than
himself and for hire and speculative pir-
poses, and in manner and 10 an extent be-
yond his business at the time he obtained
the writ of Injunction in the suit between
him and the Crescent City Live Stock Land
ing and Slaughterhouse Company, now
pending in the Supreme Court and in con
tempt Of this honorable court, and in viola
t on Of the injunction herein issued as afore-
said.
1t IS ordered that the sheriff attach the
person Of the said Francois Frilot, and
produce him before this honorable court on
Wednesday, September 8, at II A. NJ, then
and there to show cause why he should not
be punished for contempt of court. Itis
ordered that the said defendant be served
with copy of this rule.
Same VS.. Larrieux.-Same order issued.
New Orleans, Mobile and Texas railroad
VS.. City of New 0rleans.-On motion of b.
f. Jonas, City Attorney. cause ordered to
be shown by plaintiff, September IA, why
the rule should not be dismissed, because:
Tha IN ha 1.i1 ;ob -,
beou laid is obstruction to commerce, and
interteres with the free use of the levees,
encroaehing on the space necessary for the
delivery OF freight.
2. That tho Legislature granted no such
privilege to plaintiffs. and had no power to
destroy vested rights by doing So
3. That the work was done without in
struction lines or surveys by the City Sur
veyor.
4. That the work affects pnblic rights
within the juris fiction of the City Council;
that this court is without power to control
that discretion, and the plaintiffs are
.estopped from denying it.
State ex rel New York Guaranty and In
demnity Company vs.. the Board of Liquida-
tion.-Relators allege ownership OF $50
bonds of the Mississippi and Mexican Gulf
Ship Canal Company, issued under act No.
ll6, approved March 8, 1875, of $1,000 each,
with fifty coupons attached four being due
and unpaid; that they desire to exchange
them for consolidated bonds, under act No.
3, approved January A, 1874; that defenants
refuse to fand them; annex memorandum
Of the bonds, and pray for mandamus.
Rule To show cause Issued for the first Mon
day ofNovember.
First District Court.
INFORMATIONs.
Assault and bsttery-Fred Hawkins, w.
A. Murphy, Fanny Jonas, Louisa Gay, John
Higen, Dock Wright, Henry Debl, Mrs.
Brugoguh, Baptiste DespOt, Lizzie Wilson,
Charles Meyers.
Assault with intent to kill-Henry Leitz.
Petty larceny-Victoria White.
PLEADED GUILTY.
Lizzie Wilson of petty larceny; Mary VIII
liams of assault and battery.
SENTENCED.
Petty lsrceny--Elsey Howard, one year;
Ramos James, one year; William Smith, one
day.
second District Court.
Succession of Mary Ann Wingfeld opened.
Robert Becker prays to be emancipated.