The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-10-08
GENERAL WASHINGTON DISPATCHES.

WASHINGTON, Oct, 7, 1875
THE ALABAMA cLAIMs-DEcIsIoN BY THE
COURT OF COMMISSIONERS
In the Court Of Commissioners of Alabama Claims
the following business was transacted to-day
In 346, julius Sam, of New Orleans, Judgment
for s1o5S oS, with interest in case 506, Louis
Redlich, judgment for S1470 03; in 226, August
Koenig Judgment for $242 q in $50 George w.
Banker, of New Orleans Judgment for $2,2l3 49,; in
$40 John A. Peel ct al Of New Orleans, judgment
for - sos III IN case 225, Mordeca Levy OF New York,
judgment for s., 600
The following cases coming on for final hearing were
grouped and submitted upon the testimony and oral
arguments of counsel edward Jordan for claimants
and John A. Cresswell for the United Staes Mo 7oi,
Everett Lane vs.. The United States; No 79S, William
G. Tompkns Tho United States; No. l. 1913, Roger 4
Lamoric VS.. The United States; No. 1,176, David &
Thomas Wallace VS.. The United States.
In the following cases Charles G. Beman, Jr, APP
peared for the claimants:-
No. 504 Leon Godchaux vs. United States
No. 531. Charles Emanuel VS.. United States
No COS. Samuel Could VS. United States.
No. 3s2- John f. Pike VS. United States.
No. SOC. Charles Carruth VS. United States.
No. 500. w. X. Lewis Brother vs.. United States
No. 7l6, Ezra J. Wood Il Co. vs. United States
No. 500. f. b. Twombly United States.
No, 952. Enoch Kent VS.. United States.
No. 1885, Clark & Co. VS., United States.
In cases No. 35l, John s Martin VS. United States,
and No. $40, Sheridan Shook and Morgan VS.. United
States Messrs Cooley and Bearn appeared for claim
ants.
In cases No 262 Spalding and Merrill vs. United
States; No. 1880 p. b. Keen VS.. United States and
No $50 William Grant vs. United States W. A. Field
appeared for claimants.
In case No As Charles W. Williams VS. United States
r. g. McMasters appeared for claimant and Frank W.
Hackett for the United States.
THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICAN CLAIMS CON-
MIssIoN-DEcIsIoN DY THE UMPIRE
Since the last report Sir Edward Thornton has
rendered following decisions in referred to
him for decision upon differences of opinion between
the Commissioner in the United States and the Mexican
Commission viz Francis Nolan vs.. Mexico claim for
damages to growing crops by the troops of Mexico,
award ST. gold with interest six per per
mum from January l. 1865 Alexander r. harrington
vs. Mexico claim of q similar nature award 81 200 gold
with interest at six per cent from January 1885, S.
h. Parsons Mexico, claim for killing claimants
father by the Mexican authorities award $50 0O0 god
without interest and $500 gold with interest at six per
cent from August Is, 1866; John McNurty, claim for
OF mules and teams, award s., 040 gold, with
interest at six per cent from June l, 1867;
Francis Rose claim for Illegal arrest, award $500;
Benjamin Well, claim for seizure OF quantity of
cotton by the Mexican military authorities, award
SaS5 900 gold with interest at per cent from Sop
tember 20 1864; Jacob Campbell, award for value of
forage TAKEN $40 267 gold with interest at six per cent
from March . 1865 subject to divers credits amount
ing So 600 with interest the several thereof
from various dates.
The following against Mexico are rejected on
grounds, viz M. j. Lizard, J. G. G. Ill., J.
b. Lacostc John Denis, Felix Charel A. Blumenkron,
schooner Anna or Swan King and Kennedy, claimants;
Christian j. Cotter, Francis McManus II. c. and II.
Melone, Salve Pachece, Margaret NJ Crothus, Howard
and McGrorty, Lew Wallace Alfred Phpps, Fanny
Lisner, Robert : Welsh, Julian Palacios and Franklin
Chase.