The star. (Cincinnati [Ohio]) 1874-1875, 1875-04-02

G. Leserberg, some time ago, brought a
suit against Theodore ROyer and others
to marshal liens and to settle the indebt-
edness Of the various parties to the suit.
G. Leserberg was creditor of Royer. S.
Il. j. Coleman held a mortgage on the
premises of the Royer Wheel Company
and lot ON the south side not the prop
mold deed of their premises from John
Young, deceased, .. b. Little and Il.
Royer, claim that the mortgage must be
paid out OF the south side property first
and the balance out OF the estate of John
Young and o. B. Little. The company
also claimed that the real estate of the
old firm of Il. Roger d Co. was partner.
ship property, ana not liable as such.
The John Young party claimed less dues
on the mortgage. The Court held that
the mortgage oil Coleman was preferable
to the other claims, and that the conf
papy, in paying them, would have right
of action against the old firm. =.
The jury disagreed, standing II to l in
favor OF the plaintiff. in the case of John
Sulzer against Lane & Bodley, in which
petition was entered for damages
through injuries sustained at the Expo
sition while working for the defendants.
The jury were accordingly discharged.
Henry Often v. Frank Ueitz and
George Il. Bach. In this case, suit
upon note, the jury rendered verdict
Tor the plaintiff Tor $503 upon a promis-
sorry note.
John Faber against John Elmer and
others. In this case a judgment was
rendered for the plaintiff upon promis-
sorry note for $I72.
q. Ii. Rover V. VIM. Rampe. This case
came up en- the report and findings Of a
referee. Judgment was rendered Tor the
plaintiff for $499.
Jost MUIR entered an application for
an Injunction some time ago against the
village of Ayondale to restrain it from
making fill in front of his premises.
claiming that by the tumbling down OF
the earth against his premises his prop
| ferty was damaged, and that the earth
was now as hign up against his house as
the attic windows. The defendants
claimed the ill a regular authorized inl-
provement, and that the plaintiff had
| iled no petition for damages within the
prescribed time. The Court, not salts.
| fed with the testimony offered, took the
| matter under advisement.
Bernard Leonard has sued John Zieg-
ler to recover $50 on bet made on the
| last election. and it appeared that o
| third party who was not one OF the par
| ties making the bet deposited $50 with
! the defendant, ana the plaintiff deposit
ed the same sum. The plaintiff having
| lost, Ziegler paid the money over to the
third party. Judgment for the plaintiff.
S. Michaells. V. Albert Schwill Il Co.
| In this case, suit on an acceptance
| drawn upon the defendant for $233, the
jury rendered verdict tor the piaintitf.
John Ii. Loud some time since brought
| suit against j. G. Fedeldey to recover
$3.50 as a balance TO be paid on an ac-
count for services rendered as an auc-
tioneer, and the jury has returned a ver-
dict tor the plaintiff for $50.
A decree Tor divorce was granted in
| the case OF j. W. Gulick We. Elizabeth
| Gulick, as also in the case of the de-
,endant's son, Joseph A. Gulick, VS.. EN-
ma Gulick.
Chas. Phister, of this city, asks to be
declared a bankrupt.