The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-02-16
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
LARGE NUMBER OF DECISIONS RENDERED YEs-
TERDAY

TERDAY.
WARRINGTON. Feb. Is. 1875
The Supreme Court to-day rendered tho following de.
cisions:-
peal from the Circuit Court Tor California This was
sue O. now
,sdction OF OF devise which have been author
c Oh e aa Of
VIII @ ;Sf As hs 81
tlons and it were not The iacs alleged snow that the
Sourt ana that would have but ,or the snor;
the pubic EVENTS cnnnected with It The seclusion Of
the eo%Dq;inanS ana Of means Of in,ormaion
the laws Whic coniro human affairs Nor does it
married women his act does not take them out Of he
sr %, ne sYsleS Of So
justices su {; G rhn ndd ana PAYS PAYS co. ~,
snnsyIy t%is the Court !eaSr@ The des:
4c % aanS mat e S 81 sss ,as Of
that @ TO be taxed BY ths
OF the Legislature as doing bnsin IS within the State
the road the state n n% to be
AITnsd Jaies DC Ssiys1sd sse Gpiaon
Sr the 70 s 1s
case the Court hell that Under. the resolution OF the
pen1sylyans legislature Of 1913 railroad COMPANY
while debts were due for construction to deprive
done Reversed Mr. Justice Strong delivered the Spn
No. e. The American Lite Insurance Company W,
Mahone.krror to the .5cuit Court tor Mississippi
policy Of lie Insurance. the declaration Of general
S the a hs b OF the In
the best tnns the company could DO was to pay the
s e o a Sss%
% his Si
agent was not party to the occurrences Reversed.
No. l79 City of Sacramento VS.. Towle-Error to the
r Ps s
State court the ground that there no Sufficient
sssd on ss tic q
the "a The The to Sd s or
s sas The e IS" .aa ass
@ l usSs s b:s; s Y il ts ss .sss
s ~ sE or Us rs here Red s The
creditor Of nsolvent surrenders Old within
m a TAXES o9 TIVE the w. ire valid
that i this we're not So the creditor would lose MS
q DEBTOR Mr. uses sway"e l%ssa
no: ~ Fritz " Slower. exeeutor-AppeaI from the
value IN there Is no any an6 90 9
s ns vtsn @ h Ss aa IL e2r s
gha currency in discharge Of debt due ms principal
Northern OF Southern was al the ~
s s s1e um anS
intercourse with his agent for the purpose changing
Davis delivered the opinion: '''''' "'' 'u''''o
Il held that toe LANDLORD Of the defendant having Seen
y Claim and title eaa IN Socd
taith and during that time having paid all taxes &C.
; 1% sf r. sS asns claim
= tsS OF III
that amount taxation: that is not the amount ct
money invested which IS wanted for taxation, but the
OF moneyed capital which the investment repre-
sents TOR the time being. Affirmed. The Chief Justice
delivered TIE opinion. .s roo,. g..
premc Court Of Louisiana this case is held tina
s s xs Of 81 state . Court or
appeal lies to this Court Also that where Judgment
Court Would not have been concusvs po e psre
when drawn ia question in the state Court 1t cannot be
e and
nrmed. MIR. Justice Bradley delivered the opinion
Ne or ss Re Oh Cir
in favor OF Day IN bill Of review seeking
his solicitor ana counsel The Court hold that the de-
fence to the original suit was not and
the reet sought the administration Justice viii not
admit OF such pleas Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the
no. III The United States vs. O;Grsdy's Executors
Appeal from the Court Of ClaimsIn this the Court
the claimant captured cotton The secretary OF the
Treasury refused to pay the whole amount without the
The hold that after nna ud gnent by the Court OF
Claims the duty Of the secretary was to the judg
Court TO adiudcatc questions liability such as that
presented. Anir ned Mr. Justice Clifford delivered the
No. I6s. Recdy vs.. scott-Appeal from the Circuit
Court for the southern District OF Ohio This the
hosting machines Mr. Justice Clifford delivered the
The Court adjourned over until Wednesday to attend