New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-02-20

s,coocoo. or morc' than acoo,ooo He did not know
mat dollar was due TO any one OF these claimants
Ia Tho Of economy-io the Interest OF pro-
tscilne the Treasury against imposition1'nat these
count, where they might be fairy examined There was
not the least ground for apprehension mat al the rights
and interests OF the Government would not DO carefully
looked after by the Court of Claims
Before coming TO vote on the bill. The Committee. on
motion OF Mr. WHEELER (sep, y. ", rose u TO %.
aud then went into Commiy'ce OF Whole tNr. wilson,
Rev. Iowa, Ia the chai,l On the Army Appropriation
Mr. HOLMAN Dem, Indl moved TO reduce the force
OF tie aray irou 5000 ~ $1,000 men, aud argued In sap
Mr. WHEELER OF New York opposed the amendmont.
contcndng mat toe army could not safely De reduced
bel w it, present strength If the enlisted OF tie
army were Ieduecd below 2JaO, the present company
OSCILLATIONS would necessarily be broken W, and there
wound he officers lett without Inen. Toe Cnnmittee on
Appropriations believed that when the Goyerumant
invited them into service aud trained them FOR it,
wee, u was bound In gooi fiih 10 sustain tnem
MI. HOLMAN replied that army should not no fOr
TIE purpose merely II FURNISHING cmpioyment tor
means OF employing supornumcrary oincers.
The amendWe was rejected.
shall not be used 10 subver; the rights and hber
ties or interfere with the Legislatures Of tho states OF
Treasury until the Uhed a.es troops the State
OF Louisiana shall Uc Withdrawn IRON that state. He
s %S cs not g"s % rom nj t the
Republican side Ho believed that that question had
been determined Ia the Senate. Thrre Mas picce-
demo for his amen mcnt ia tie Army bill OF 1870.
Mr. WHEELER sad he might let the amendment DO
except out N compliment TO III, colleague lis reDlnled
bis COLES quo the time wIen Co. sumner uDder
Jc n Wis, then Secretary of War;
drove tho Kansas Legislature out OF doors, Hnd he
asked hlm wncCd,r Ee approved OF hat proceeding.
Mr.. (0X-I did not. l spoke against IL. took
Judge DJdglass's srolad on tnt suJcc.- Old not ap
prove OF IL.
Mr.. WHEELER lsenIing to the Clerks desk volume
OF TIE Congressional GtO6tI ask the Clerk 10 read tho
remarks ~ colleague the 2tth OF Juy, 1856.
ME-. COX-rDo dn itODce III iAe two Cases IL una one
bOly mop, tue other legislature. Loud cries Jf
Read, Read" TrOin she Republican side. Taere Is
moo there too. T. Read, R'ad," ana lsugnter.I
Tue Clerk proceeded - read Tie marx ex Ilct from
TIE Congressional Globe Ia which Mr.. Cox detlaicd hln
sell encouraging tbe hedrt and stronghold
lug the Executive power of the G'vernment
Triumphant laughter ON the RepnDic21 sideI
NJ COX [.uteFrIp ing tbs rcadin. ]Wh1t - the d1te
OF matt i5hOuts Of "R1d" "Kstd,"s On."] l
make tue IIint of order. 70 on Read" "Rra.."J
l know what about. What Is the date % that
TIE CcT stated that 1t was from the proceedings oil
the PAIN Ol July. 1886.
Nj. cox tsIdnpIAlty)-raa is "A speech made ny
LeanGer al. Cox, Oi kenIutky. 10 Nj. WuoelcrJ Now,
are ' ga not ashamed OF yOuTsclIf LJld iduru.orI
IDemDer Of Congress at tAo lime. olodtS OF
5al, read read from me DemOcrtio sidcJ never
made tLat ~geecn not member OF IhC House at
the ume. Laugtter]
M. WIILELER-DU yOu now say that you were not
Ihrl % inetu II tAc HUlsel
Mr. CO&-l took my seat al 1871.
ME- WHEEIEi.-AIdy you were not member IN july
1861
tfOr later Congregational Proceedings Sevegh Pa9c@