The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-05-19
DECISIONS.
SUPREME COURT -cHAMBERs.

SUPREME COURT CHAMBERS
BY Judge Lawrence.
Hcldane VS.. Caldwell.-Some notice should be
given 10 the attorney.
Van zie vs. Van Zre.-Referred for reason
stated In former memorandum.
In the matter OF Thomas Walsh.-I see no reason
for gaming an order 10 show cause IN tn 3 case.
stevens VS.. Lena.--The writ is upon a Judgment
recorded IN foreign country, and an attachment
has been issued. The motion Is to vacate the at
tachment, on ne ground thar TINS is not one OF
the cases IN whcl, under section ~ OF The Code,
an Attachment can be resorted to. An altach-
ment Is au horized IN an action arising on con-
tract for me recovery OF money only A
tue hIgnest grade oil contract. entity, p. %
This judgment was Tor the recovery OF a specific
think that II Is case, therefore, In which an at
tacnment may be issued. The case cited by
ports aud under the Revised statutes, and does
not control the construction to be given TO the
code. ne motion 10 vacate attachment denied,
Win costs.
Blohm vs. Avery-Altnough the answer is very
vouminous think tins can be fairly tried
in an hour ana II 1t cannot tue plaintif VIII incur
the penalty OF being sent 10 tue foot Oh the calen-
dar. Mouon grained.
payment OF $40, costs Of motion, and me pam
tns costs before nollce OF trial in eacn case, on
the defendant giving bond, to DE approved oy
the Court, to pay any Judgment that may ne re-
covered against him herein. The causes TO De
placed upon the calendar :or wednesday, the Zotn
OF Mai 1876.
Mutual Lie Insurance Company vs. whelpley.-
want the papers in TINS case me proof OF the
service OF the defendant Whelpley Is not sum-
Gent the afidavls OF the publishers OF the news
papers must oe produced.
FeuchtNanRer Va. Llchenstein.-I want the com.
plant aud summons IN this action.
Hennessey " me En-, Ire Fire Extinguisner
Company.-0rGer reset'led.
Goodrich ". Atlantic Mail Steamship Com
pany-I cannot appoint one OF the plaintins re-
ceIver OF the deie dans.
LaszK VS.. scott..-Motlon TO make answer more
definite and cert ain is denied, with costs.
Ross vs. Ross.-Oruer granted, with allowance
OF S25 to the defendant.
Hull vs.. Mola.-l see no necessity Tor referring
the Gnn hn ri Thn al
the plaintiff desires speedy trial, on Application
for tnat purpose on proper notice.
davit which shows the ground on when the taxa
tion OF the costs Is objected TO- | require the
peadlngs and some memorandum or statement
SHOWING what has been done in the action and
pointing out tue ground OF the appeal from the
adjustment made by the clerk.
Worster VS.. kelemaT-lhe inquest will be
opened on payment OF plaintiffs costs before no.
tlce of trial and $40 costs Of moon, The deiendan
to give bond with two sureties, TO be approved
by the Court. TO pay any judgment that may be
recovered against him, SAID suretles To justly IN
twice the amount OF plalntIff's ann and case to
be set down for trial Tor Monday, NAV 81.
Deal vs.. Dea.-l think tnaL the AFFIDAVIT should
be more specific as to the eXertions which nave
been made to serve the defendant IN TINS State.
schanck vs.. Green wIll grant an order 70
show cause why a peremptorY mandamu5 should
be issued, but will not grant writ without argu-
ment.
Daley VS.. Daley.-I see no reason for granting
an order 70 snow cause IN this case. See rule 40.
Knowles VS.. Brennan; Gossler ct al. vs. Germa-
MIA Smelling Refining works; The Widdecomb
Furniture COMPANY vs.. Beaton; The Mutual Life
Insurance company W. fttzsimmons; Board OF
Supervisors vs.. Tenth National Bank Reed VS..
Tnden; Du Pdsquler vs. squire; Edwards VS..
H4thaway.-Orders granted.
Mast vs.. Tracy; clety Tor the Reform OF Juve-
nile Denquents VS.. FIeligh; Cohen VS.. Michael;
Doctor vs.. cameron; kutTer vs.. North; Colling vs..
snyder; Wnlttlesey vs. nan; In the matter q me,
Slate Company; Kirby vs.. Bradley; Loco VS.. VIII
lams; BaEer VS.. MeNin Enistern vs. Dean; Enr-
len VS.. Enrich: Union Dime savings Institution VS..
Stope; Courtenay VS.. New York, West SHORE aud
chicago Railroad COMPANY, No. 2; New York Saw
lips lips VS.. Mccormack: McKeoh VS.. Lscnner; Ache
son vs.. Acheson et al; Philips vs.. Cnapin; THIRD
vs. Gregory; Ames rs. RedIcn; Union
Banking Company vs.. Slgel; Lodi Chem.
New YorE Loan and Indemnify Company vs..
Moore; Adams VS.. culver: Morrison VS.. Morrison;
Campbell; Harris vs. Kennedy; Townshend vs.
NebenZanl; hoppin VS.. Cuzzans; Missionary So
cleGy OF the Methodist Episcopal tnurcn vs. houTh-
ton; Kelly rs: Marsh: Matthias ". Gould Frost
Ramsey; Cone VS.. Foster; Royd VS.. The Pekin
Acoho Manufacturing Company; steinway VS..
VS. Fechter; Barley vs.. Luddington;
o'conner vs. colnns; Bennett vs.. Cohen:
Keller vs. ST. LuKe's Hos1lral: Fry VS. Butler;
Wright VS.. Anvil; FagE ". scott; Cnldester vs.
Russell: Anthracite Insurance company OF Phila-
delohia vs. Hughes; Harris vs.. Kennedy; Murray
vs.. Murray; Germania Life Insurance Company
VS.. Moore Roberts VA Meyer.-Granted.
BY Judge Donohue.
Wright VS.. DonnelOn.-Granted.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERN.
BY Ju0Re Van Worst.
Sachs ct al. We. Dcklnsol=Inere Is no proof OF
plaintIff's DEFAULT IN not appea ing to oppose.
GlauDerg ct al vs.. Farley, ct al; Anthony
Giynn.-Mottons granted.
Riggs vs. BottOne.-Ba reduced 70 81, 000
same VS.. Same.-BIil reduced 10 $4,000.
Freeman Hurson ct a.-Each defendant Is
entitled 10 costs. Motion granted.
Daily VS.. Beatty.-Motlon granted. see orner.
Bailey VS.. Hatton.-OrdeT 70 pay over money to
plaintiffs attorney grated.
shaier W. schneider et al.-Judgment OF fore
closure and sale.
Olvany vs.. Clark-Pettion granted
Haliett vs. Glilman.-order Tor substituted SER
vice granted.
Raubltsnek vs.. Blank.-Moton granted on pay
ment oil costs 81 the term Including trial lee and
Subsequent costs and executing 10 the plain TINS
an Undertaking, with two sufficient sureues to
pay any Judgment tnat may be recovered 10 the
action, and upon paying ten dollars costs OF this
motion.
Bryant vs. Gllman.-Siay or proceedings vacated
from and alter the hrst Monday OF June
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TFRM.
BY Judge Larremore.
Norris VS.. NOrrIs.-keIereDce ordered