New-York tribune., 1875-02-03
rHE rnrPARrITE COVENANT.

O Ithen pass to TIE month of May, 1873. be
reyc c tipartc agreement was then published ii not
A. Ycs Sir
What occurred after the publication OF that tpartite
sgreerenf In the hr-t ace Will ask You you had any
connection with the publication Of ~ A No Sir
O. Were sou connected directly or indirectly with its pub
@ Did you Know that it was 70 be patilshed' A did
O. Now what occurred after its publications A. Yoo mean
what occurred between M Beccler and mei
@ Yes S.r A. The uipartite covenant was published on
the morning q Declaration DAY. Friday May 3Gh 1879 and
putuhed wta prefix attached signed Suffolk written by
samuel Wlk- eu.on dr. Bseclcrs business partner
Mr Eyar,s-You don't know about that You were asked
what i; signed
Tie Wines It signed Suffolk
NJ Eyarts-It IL matter who wrote IT,
Tho W,ncss- And tie explanation given why it was pub
Hshed was aa. Mr. Bowen mad the year previous etfacted
those stories stli CpeatHs them
Nj Eyarts- on mean n the rapcrf
The Wi.ac.s-Ar explanation vas given ID tH paper yes
sr-tho predatory uo,e signed suffolk
JUDGE Nelson rha, speaks for itself Mr. Tilton We al
ways take Tie paper
The WI,ness-Ics. SIR.
Nj Fulcr.ou-Iavc you got that letter signed Suffolk
A No. Sir; 4n not my brothers keeper
O. You may Ind state what occurred between you and
A., Be,ler ina reference 10 A. The trpartite covenant
being in the journals Of Friday morning May th 1879 was
accompanied viii comments tn many cases 70 this effect
namely tnat cc evidence that M Bowen ana MI IIton
had committed and horrible crime against Mr.
Beecaer for wh CD cracousy paroned but that IN
80 doing he lad committed ofense agau society, that
instead OF sraonn should han brought INTO the
Courts Of Justice punished for sander and sent 70
Jail
Mr. Esars-Is tins what you said to Mr. Beecherf A No
SiL
Mr. Eyarts-This is part Of a Newspaper
Mr. Beach-It is rart Of surrounding circumstances.
Mr. Eyar,s-That must struck The question was u
very proper one passed between himself and Mr. Beecer
Nj FuIef.on-Ald ho states what passed, which Is
proper
Judge Ncson-I, may be struck ont
M Ful.er;on-Yes Sir will put il in in another place.
Nj Fueron-What occurred between you and M Beecher'
A. went around to Mouon house the next morning,
and told Mr. Bcecher then the previous evening
consulted with Of my friends in New York
Mr. Evarts-Was Mr. Beecher there? A Mr. Beecher came
there in few minutes. FOR we sent for him.
M FulcrtOn-Commence narration when he got there
Mr. Beecher for Mr. Monitor bad some conyer-
saon with regarding the publication Of this tparte Gov
enant Mr. characterized az an act Of bad faith be
ease the tparte covenant had been the joint property
q, the thee s.cners-Mr Bowen, Mr. Beecher and
myslf-and thct neither Of those sgners had a
right 70 publish il without the consent OF both OF
the others that It had been pubished IN an
unwaranable way and that the cnucsms II had produced
were that could be expected 10 bear
them and not make told Nj Beeche that the com
ents which that publication had elected in one day made 1t
necessary that there should be prompt and emphatic dis
elamer either by him by me, didn't care winch OF any
such intmaton that had committed against MIN CRIME
when he knew that il was he who had committed
against me crime told him would not permit the pubAc
press put the position Of having ben pArdoned o
atrodty which all the greater IN the puohe
Imagination named and that be must cor
rect thai would impression which that pu0hc%uon
produced
tod him that had in consultation with friends the
xssss,slasg ssssysa 90 ~ asgAes " Dsvssnag H. -