New-York tribune., 1875-01-19
ALAwYER's sHREwD FLANK MOVEMENT.

Judge Nelson 10 MT Fullerton Inc COunscl
objects your reading it in the hearing OF the Jury
Mr. FullertonWen your Honor can't get on the record
without reading it, Your Honor don't put it on the record by
reading it.
Mr.. Evarts-Why certainly; he marks 1t.
Mr. FnllertonNo at ALL II 1t shut ont II will do no harm
to the defendant II let in why then has its natural
effect.
have evidence both n and hayeaDexcepton for ruling
out that understand Now, he has got exception to its
being ruled out and he would like to have it in
Mr. Beach-ow does get in when it is not admitted
Mr.. Eyars-By reading it.
Mr. Bcach-Does reading proposition make 1t evidence
Mr.. Eyarts-It thepurpose.
Mr. Beach-Answers the purpose How Does the gentle
man dsus the gentlemen OF the Jury that they will not obey
your Honor in ruling evidence And does your Honor
mean to deny the privilege OF making proposal Of proof
Judge Nelson-No Sir.
Mr.. Eyars-In the ordinary mode.
Mr. Fueon-I offer In evidence this part OF the statement
to wit readingl
rerret for your sakes responsibility imposed OF
appearing there night II say nythng must speak the
at large or even Of this COMMITTEE ought to be grated
throu any recitation BY Of the facts which are in my pos
session. necessarily In confidence, through my relation
to the parties. The personal differences Of which |
an aware a the chosen arbitrator, have once been
settled honoraby between the parties and would never have
been revived except account OF recent attacks bon IN and
Tion to thought reply II the present
issue be settled must be- my opinion by the parties
"efsnce %ttSs e''H 'Ap' am ' fully cOnSeiap With
pares Isti Il % Necessary deem my duty to state the truth
order TO final settlement and that the world may be well In
aS PETER SrfeSrs supSe to- Oa 5 the pe be
heard THAT then deem it necessary that should appear
noting 5Ht me tra;h"
Judge Neison-we that Is ruled out. You take an excep-
ton specially to that. Now the next.
Mr.. Fullerton-I also offer this to wit
Ihod tonight as held hitherto the opinion that Mr.
Beecher should frankly state that he had committed an oee
against Mr. Tto for which necessary TO apologize and
which he did apologize IN the language OF the se part OF
which has been quoted
Judge NelsonSame ruling as to that and same exception
Mr. Fullerton-I also offer this:
THAT he referring Mr.. Beecher] should have stated
frankly that be deemed for Mr. ton TO have made
the defense against Dr. Leonard Bacon whsh ne od max
and that he M Beeche should refuse " BE- party to he re-
opening Of this painful subject"
Judge Neilson-ssme ruling
Nj Fullerton-IReadingl
he had made this statement he woud have stated no
mor than the truth aud would have saved him and you
the responsibility OF further inquiry 1t Is better now
Mr. Beecber himself should make the statement which have
suggested that il the Committee doe- report ,he report sou
be- recommendation " Mr. Beccher " make saea state
ment"
JUDGE Neison-Same ruling az 10 that
Mr. Evarts [excitedlyl Now. IL your Honor please my
learned friend read every particle OF this paper except
mere snrusage Violently throwing book on the table,
It is proper.
Mr. Eyarts-Fie has done II, as told you.
Mr. Fleron-And have read because want to offer it
in evidence, except the surplusage
Judge Neson-I think you have done properly
Mr. Fuleron-Is the complaint that have not offered the
surpusagei
Mr. Eyars-The situation h very plain one You offered
naper which was ruled out There should have been an end OF
it. You then parts OF It, said on some particular
Discrimination and in that respect You read the "ho'e paper
except mere fonnality.
Mr. Fuerton-And the whole paper ruled out and an It's
parts'
Mr. Evarts-Thst was the frd ruling.
Mr. Fullerton Undoubtedly It was
Mr. EyartsYou said you would make the discrimination
Mr. Fulleiton.-I have Disseminated.
Mr Evarta-welL don't see IT, daughter,
Mr. Fuerton-The gentleman says have not offered the
,urpusaee have Disseminated between the wheat and the
chan lie the chaf also, II understand him right
aughtet) left just what chose TO leave out The
gentleman preclude from making my ofef " tesu
mony.
Judge Neil-on-Ths s right The aadonce don't begin well
this Monday morning This bad beginning Please not to
repeat that again
BY Mr. Fucron-Eow hsd the Bacon letter then been pub
Nsheif A. Yea Sir the Bacon t,er published had been
pubshed-thc Bacon letter hrf been published
O. Do you know bow long It had been pubshcd'
Mr Bcach-we take exception each Of those rulings.
Judge Ncilson-Yes, Sir
@ whether hnt Bacon kttcr had been the subject Of
conversation between yourself and Mr. Bcecher' A. 1t had
been; ycs, Sir
@ Prior the reading Of the statement Of which you have
spokcns A. Sir and the subject Of conversation at
the time spoke To nm with reference TO this statement
q And what did Mr. Beccher Nv at the time you read that
statement him. anything with reference to the apology
called refer to the letter January 1871 in that
ssaiioni A. / said to him, said to Mr.. Beecher-
q Go ont A. said TO Mr. Bcecher. have recommended
from the f-have said from the FIRST rather that this Bacor
letter, In my opinion, offered basis for recon