New-York tribune., 1875-01-28
THE REDIRECT EXAMINATION.

The redirect examination was begun
Mr. Fucon-Your attention has been called certain con-
verstons between yourref and Mr. Tracy with regard to this
matter and you asked whether did not say GER
tar tElg Now ak wh4, yOu did TO Nj Tracy on this
occasion
ayThat object 70. have inquired OF no interview
tina; they did NOT 90 into
judge Neoul that the point where was suggested he
should auswcr aud explain afterwards
Fu,ronY Yes Sir; that strictly within your Honor
railing yesterday similar objection or course we are to
presume they laying the foundation for attempted
contrad whilst the witness denies having certain
bngs ", have rgh, prove that he sad certain other
things.
Judse Neiacn-wen you may ask him that question,
think
g Whaf was sad upou those occasons'
Judge Nelzou-On pointed out by Mr. Tracys
question:
Mr. TracyThey examined abou that interview al the Fifth
Ayen4c Hoto fully nto all they desired 10 go into
abodt and ta he withheld these papers at my
quest Now ask him simply the only papers asked him
10 withhold requested him withhold not certain
deGu.t, Iap,r- which named. II IL Tie only inquiry
judge Nci'-.l-To t.a- be- -ay- no.
NJ Faci.ol-S,v s.aA 10 know the balance Of the con-
yo-saucr.
Mr. Beach rls, not The only inquiry Certainly coun-
.n 20 tie point whether or not the statement
wa ftst t.c bat any Conversation asked
tin u regard 10 the contents Of the statement.
fri.yAt hs own nouse, al which was not PRESENT.
VI Fa.e.1r-A.-.r Ffth Avenue Hotel
NJ Taly-A 50, ~. Except far az asked him. The
only fccaesl the subject Of certain dedn
IT, rlucrsi
Juden Nel.ol-TAs. my recollection and the ques
ton ley ask him what hs really said
think they may.
Mr racy-Of lie subject Of this paper.
Judge Nclson-Cu he subject Of this inquiry.
M Tacy-Ihcn viii be limited TO tbs subject Of this par
tcnar paper.
Judge Nel sorTat particular occasion when he says you
snlp unn TO retain certain papers the inquiry
now n hat he did say that occasion.
Nr Eyar-Your Honor will notice do not introduce that
,oucrsaon The xamnaton only reference TO their
previous examination Of hm and only crossexamne on this
particular point That er;any does give any right TO re-
sumo whole interview can see nor do understand
your Honor 70 rule.
Judge Nelson still think he may answer the question.
The witness-WLat is the question:
The TRIBUNE stenographcr read the question:
M Tncy-Conane yourself to the occasion inquired Of
That .s the occasion ot the Fifth Avenue Hoteli
NJ Fullerton--That I. one Of them.
NJ Traey-Le take conversation Ut time and see
what reply viii GET
Mr.. f9,Ierton-You are asking about what know. We
viii get il out in way.
Nj Tfacy asked question which called for that retort
This inquiry relates ;he conversation at the hotel Your
Honor VII exception 10 the admission Of our inter
view.
Wlfness-I SAID 10 Gen butcf ~ lnat INTERVIEW, i
have brought Mr Tracy you determine with regard 70 this
statement Mr. Tracy has said 70 be did not want me TO
make - statement do exactly that which is honor
able IA premises wish you and Mr Tracy would talk
over Nj Tracy sat down and talked with Mr Butler
nd said 20 Butler in my presence that he thought the
letters and umens Of Nj Beecher Ough not to be produced
n NJ statements that is the substance Of the conversation
IS remember il at that time and when Gen. Tracy
aavI saw Gen Butler and he said Gen Tracys idea was
M Fuueron-Yon need not what Mr. Butler said in
Nj Tcys Now 70 the occasion referred " by
Mr. Tracys examination Of you.
Nj Tracy-What was that occason'
Judge Nellson-Where that occasioni
The witness-Mr Tracy did not name It.
NJ Boacl-The occasion Mr. Moultons house when Mr.
Tracy inquired Of him whether IL upon that occasion that
the f0rr ~ sta,einent was finally agreed upon
Ju- N,leOn-That occasion when lie was not pres
err.
NJ Bea-T7.ai makes difference. The witness says
wa dray areed upon We know why II agreed
,pon aud how agreed upon.
5udse Nrs0u think must leave il as IL is. Mr. Tracy
wa p-e-enl
NJ Flerou-Do you recolect an interview In the back
room when che Committee sitting IN Mr. stors house,
,,ir vo yau Id -nt your statements A. remember Mr.
Tracy wa there when presented a statement.
M E,ar-We object that the ground that It Is not
any part q our recross-examinaton-
M Fileron-Mr Tracy asked the witness whether at any
time before q statement presented TO the Committee nc
(Tracy1 knew what the statement was 10 be.
Mr Tracy-With lis knowledge.
Mr. FuertonI know that and what now ask him Is 70 uy
and his attention 10 an between him ana MI Tracy
At another place back room where e 'oie sat- @'
which time Mr. Aoatop stated o Nj Tracy What hs statement