The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-06-08
NEW YORK HERALD TUESDAY JUNE 8 l875-TRIPLE SHEET.

cerned to prevent any publicity or the relations
then existing between Illton and MS iGmi " and
u tue Visit 70 Nlkeson had not had the erect on
Bowen Of procuring the payment 81 the $7,OOO, IL
thal SIP hua not produced the result, then ihrss
other SINS that were In existence or WOodlul'a
NoA!d nave Oeeu resofteu Q as more 70 @erlul
englhe Tor the acc0Mp Ishment OF their object.
hut the threatened publication Of me. Bowen
others were reserved Tor some iuture use. II was
THIS "tit lor tai" letter that produced tnis
Wondu's pubaealon consequences not only WIN
drawing rom her support ns lunction with tne
great democratic party with which he had
not been hitherto ii unison. lie refused
to longer support Mrs Woodaull Tor
the Presidency VINO caH tell what the Union
might nave galaed III this nnl struggle for the
supremacy OF toe AIR sex Wno Can estimate
what effect II VIII have The deafness Of the
country /? Bur- then, this woodruff publication
came III a most onpartune manner, &c time
when u serves personal purposes. rnis lady nad
VIII Of her own, aud what IN the sprlng of 1872
had been prepared ior ms use Yhiie friendly with
the plantn nov came ~ In another position,
and IHs Woodnul publication created great con-
sternaron Ia the camp OF the Moultons. Inc
statement came 10 be made pnblic That Til on mad
furnished tine information on which the story was
nals and others on the Produce Exchange seemed
TO thnk thaG MoutoR ought II his own defence,
either deny the responsibility fer tine 81 ory or own
that there was some truth IN ~; that lie should
say II was all false, mat he had furnished no sup
port Tor = at an or ADMIT u. Wen, we called
a zen people To say what he did say, and they
put IL IN very different form. lie tells you that
ne was
LYING FOR MIR. REEcnEE.
Oh, gentlemen, man VINO lies for Mr.. Beecher
VIII lie Tor himself It may be a hard shift for THIS
plaiatin that ne has no wlrness TO prove us case
or their own mouth nave told yeu thaG
tney nave lied and he'd TO put wrong face ON
this matter The trouble is wneu he PAGES ex-
plantations 60 snow you MS motives Tor lalsifca-
tlon tgcy we're then trivial compared with tue
motive Tor fals hea,lon now, aud II You Judge be-
tween the ials l1eaton o. tue two stories YOU VIII
nud the doubtful testimony IN Inc scraps OF papers
he produces The dlnlcuty lies between whlca Is
the story ana which IS the truth. The counsel
Tor the paintlf. oesirous OF having certain al
vantages from what he expected TO prove OF COM
pnclfy OF Mr. BeecGer III tine poncy UI silence and
Justification OF wing, se Ks some lttle phrases 10
snow thai ar. Beecner bound by WHAT was
said hy Mr.. Tracy prac, futon Woodruff and
Mouiton were a,one witnesses OF what passed at
that interview, and NOT Mr.. Beechcr, who not
party TO that conference. fbe evidence OF these
conversations mas been displayed 20 give tine inn
preston that he was TracY's cOnv ersallons were
with lilton aud Moultou, ana nc might, therefore,
have been hrought as a witness Tor the defence.
Sec now the devices o men wno met for evll turns
10 good. They mad oeen Tying 10 make out That
Mr.. beeeher acqulesced anu tnat Mr. Tracy acqui-
esceo. me Subsequent charge o. adultery leads
to the release VI MI. Tracy from any re-
straint or feeling when they Introduced the
Now call your attention to the subject or MIR.
Tracy's iutervlew. Then "Moudon got per-
mission from Mr.. Beecher to tell the truth.n
Az that interview, taen, he did tell Tracy the
truth. They tod Tracy he Story they told strange
people. All thelr evidence Is That they were 10
case when you hnd what Ghey Iold nim CORE.
spends with every written paDer in respect to the
charge-tne retraction, The letter OF contrltion,
The 'True Story tine genial oil the imputation by
Tlton thar nis WHO had been guilty OF any Im-
purity TO slorrs, Belcher, Harmon. schultz. VIII
keson, Mcheway and 70 others, there is nothing
IN tue room now for doubt. They were o ell the
truth 10 Tracy, as permitted 10 do oy Beecner,
ana now see what theY did tell him. Now you
must eltner stamp General Tracy as perjured
witness and condemn him as incompetent IN I'M
d"rs andlng the statements and the documents
there, or you must throw out this testimony as
falsehcods on the other side. OF whom Judge We
General Tracy has cool Judgment and an honest
heart, ana ne stamps TINS whole case as con-
splracy.
At TINS point Mr. Evarts read copous extracts
from the evidence OF General Tracy touching the
interview IN question, when occupied his time
Tor the remainder OF the afternoon, after which
the Court was adjourned TIL eleven O'Clock this
forenoon.