, 1875-09-30


john S.oama 4 member Of tue firm of Eocle
h Co., He'd bill yesterday In the Superior Court
against Daniel nnd Wn1tcr s. Boglo and Daniel
Boglc, Jr., asking for an account and Injunction.
stoarus allesoH thnt May l. ls73, he went
into partnership in tho coal business
With Wa1tor s. Uogle. Ho contributed about
$4,000 In money, personal property. and bills
receivable as his share Of tho capital, but Dogio
himself d1d not contribute anything. Tho firm
continued without change until June, 1874.
SteerIsa giving all his time and attention To tho
business 1t Ii charged hoWoyor, that ". 8.
Bogto did not dcvo:o all hiu timo to his buai-
noss, but, On tho contrary, engaged with his
sathor, Daniel Boyle. in dealing in coal by tho
cargo, causing g,cat dotsin'ont to Tho firm Of
Boyle d Co. The TWO Bogles. ab It is claimed,
| used tho bookAeePer and collector of the firm
for thor outside business, and also
| managed 80 TINT the firm would he mato
responsible for any loss. Dan,e! 10.
also advanced aome sl,ns to bis son Watsr. In his
trim business. ssearos was employed a the Office
o @ os e e. E.
stearns further states Tint Dan1e and Walter Boyle.
In their cargo transactions, mnde free Of the office,
furniture, iooks Of account, and sarvaua Of tho frn
charging tho w1oIo expense to tho ntm account ot
band than ey could dispose o. the susplul dis.
charged ths dock Of noglo : Co., notwith-
hkAHH!IK I!8 nfIH tHiHHt BnA ulA A&F6 At iQS tlm6
business. by ruason Of thcso operations loslo 4 O.,
+ .sss sss sy of
rsnss Not oily hs. sut ths fosos d tho spiins ot
whom, they had sold it about aol tons Of coal. and
thls whols amount wns Immediately charged so Boyle
6,0Oo tons Of coal which had been carried over
The htslnosa iip to shat hme had been d!sah-
m AIM tnltnu tn find
tho stale Of affairs. and tue business
/ ss, g + informed sSs n 5pa0 t e. ,ss Tsa
made objsst,on knowing that Daniel noR|s v:
aprs Coofs .a.s. es1'siai wes contrib-
was even hs ilrrn mans changed, al tho only aiter,
tion was Lie addition Of the Of the new ie,ub4r
arason of 18Th tho cargo apcculaslans of Dsnei end
waer loeIe wese continued IN tho aamc 1oanner the
psoats bsinE charged to them personally, tbs Ak
msde composed ii Daniel au.i wsltel s. Doss I M aud
Daniel Boyle, Jr. They have tAken possession ef tho
office, furniture, books accountA ete Of Dog!e & Co..
whoat e. making M ny seteeat and ssasns y sft
that thoy hare been defectyely Kept, and that
10 ia. az s.ata eannot rshy @ be formed ~ s
- to thu amoHnt duo him. a privato yet Of boois,
oss sons s nans1 a 1a
tAo rcsus Of which only appear tls rm accounts,
mud complainant thtnka they will DO pf great value IN
striking balance. He hna repeatedly askod for M
account and settlement. but tho iefonlAnss have
suwinx Of the arm books, Insisting also that atnce
June lst he was only entitled 70 tonth interest
Ter s. Hoge, the Inter be!ng his son-nsw, and has
not examined tho books critically, but having besn
mistaken IN his trust. be sats for full discovery
be found to b duo hisu by ths Court,
and aso asks for tho appointment OF !
Receiver. and for Injunction to prevent tie defend-
from further interfering In tho Affair." OF tho de-
funct arm Of Uoge Co., or from collecting ita
6EkY.