Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1875-04-13

ta'Sreport, the Governor has decided
nod ID recall the military until all dam
ger of violence in the Lucerne coal re-
gion has disappeared.
More Of Beecher's Testimony. %.
New YORK. April H..
The Bsecher trial attracted a large
crowd to-day. Beecher continues 10
testify: At times / visited Monlton's
house every day, at other times no
oftener than Once u week, or month,
or two months. In 1871, after Nav,
there were comparatively few visits
till Autumn. In this period there was
little done about the difficulty, but
there was a busy time after the publi-
cation of the Woo1hull scandal. l re-
call two conversations with Mrs.
MOulton about Mrs. Woodruff. At
one she referred To the enthusiasm
which her husband and TiltOn had for
Mrs. Woodruff, at another she asked
me what Thought Of Mrs. Woodruff.
/ replied my knowledge was only de-
rived from what l had heard from
others. She said she DIDN'T fancy her,
but Frank thought very highly of her
and she CONFIRMED to his desire in
having her at the house. There never
was a word with her about her receiv-
ing Mrs. Woodruff on my account. l
never said to her it was a duty she
owed Frank to cooperate with him in
trying to keep the story quiet; never
told Moulton his wife should work
with him iL his endeavors t suppress
it. Had a talk with her about attending
church in 1870. l remember her
speaking with some anxiety as
to securing a seat in 1872 and
1873. She spoke to me alb, u
having two seats. referred
her to Mr.. West, and also talked with
her. She was kind enough to COM
pliInent me on my improvement in
preaching, from what she had heard
others say and had heard herself. l
recOllect she came on Two occasions tn
church, and saw her waiting at The
pulpit steps. l recollect Oh two other
occasions when I called to see MOul-
ton, Mrs. NJ. said to me, Why don't
you call sometimes to see us, or pay
us a social visit. instead of business
visits to Frank" Ihad a conversation
with her about this difficulty; had also
conversed with her about Mrs.T 1
wanted some one to visit Mrs. Il. and
cheer her. l Thought Mrs. Moulton
was the very person. Afterfmeeiing
Mrs. Tilton, l asked Mrs. Moulton
how she was getting along. She did
not blame Mrs. T., but on one mr. two
occasions blamed 1ilton, l think, in re-
gard 10 his home relations. She spoke
OF the state of things in the family,
and said she would not wonder IL there
was a separation in the family, and
that Mrs r. would go back to her
mother. l asked her to tell me if there
was any way in which Mrs. r. could
be helped. We had a conversation
about the story that l had alienated
Mrs. rs affections from her husi and,
which l said ! had never done. l said
if | had it WAS u~nintentional On my
part, and | was very sorry for it. Mrs.
Moulton said very little in reply to me
upon this point. ! felt that my pres
ence and intercourse in the family had
brought this mischief on them, for
which / felt i WAS to blame. During
my interviews with Mrs. M0ulton at
that house she was incapable of accns-
ing me OF adultery, or any crime to-
wards Mrs. II. We never conversed
together on that subject, or limited NJ it
by allusion or implication, and she
never spoke of it being said by any
person else. l never spoke to her OF
any conversation with her being my
last interview. l said If Triton pub
lished my letter of apology it was Use.
less for me to try to live it down.
Never said had no hope from Tilton.