The Pulaski citizen. [volume] (Pulaski, Tenn.) 1866-current, 1875-03-18
CHANCERY CouRTs.

DEGREES have been entered IN the follow
ing causes since our last report
A b Beech, Adm r, vs. Laura snd John Lester
Jno ID Wright, Admir-, vs. w . Bennett ct
al; 4 Upshaw, ct al IS E p Upshaw Ct al !;
BUfOrd I al VS. J Paterson ct al; Jno
Brown ct al vs. Il husbands ct al; T
AFRO wsmlth, Admir- vs. " z. Arrowsmith ct
al; Moore. ct al rs Nancy Moore ct a.;
Eiizabeth Sullivan, VS. Jno Sullivan; NJ NJ
Gloon VS. L Fisher ct al; JAS W King ct al
vs. Louis King ct al: Mary + Holmes, vs. W
" Gordon ct al; b Z Moore vs. W 5 Newbill.
ct al; J G Roberts VS. / Dobbins ct al
Henry Atkinson VS. L d Suite, Alfred Rev
holds " l. ID Suttle. J Smith rs JOs Smith,
!no z Black ct al vs. " K Black. ct al; Thos
3 Daley, Admir- vs. Nancy F Vance, j z
Eel, ct al vs. q W McGrew ct al; L SOiinky
vs. J T Fisher, Rob Sanders and wife. VS.
Joel B Stockard, Admir-. ct al; a Buf0rd
guardian, vs. Sarah L Budiord, ct al; NJ
Eleemal VS. f L Fleeman L 7. Evans Fx'r
vs. Cecv Niis.ord, Furman and Co, IS Jas !
Mcmillan ct al; T T Burgess vs. JAS L Nc
MILAN ct al; w "A Walker - JAS Carter ct
al; Mary Powell ct al rs 5 3 liSmmonds
ct al; J ID Lewis ct al vs. W \ Malone ct al A.;
A Buford ct al vs. Della Tayler ct al;
King ct al vs. Andrew King ct al; Jno s
Gilbreth vs. a E Cannon ct nj; 5 Calvert,
Adm r, vs. Wilkes ct al; y NJ Appleton
and wife vs. Jos Jackson ct al; Henry House,
Admir-, vs. J G Young ct al; d A Jnman ct
al vs. Lewis AnIis ct al; Pink Steele VI J W
lHlANu Sl as - NJ GOfuOu vs. Juo GltcA
ct al; B Walker vs. s G Calve,t ct al; L 2
Holmes vs. W w Gordon ct a.; J L and VIM
Hayney VS. A z Martin ct al; J 7 Fisher "
" A Malone e. al; J L Nelson vs. J 7 Nc
kiss ack, Jno Moore rs J 7 Henry, Chas Blu
ford Is U Carter ct al; Jno p Norwood rs
Jno NJ Hewitt ct al; ID Res nolds vs. Ann
Reynolds ct al; Margaret X Golf ct al VS.
Oscar Cole ct al; T NJ Wood ct al vs. Mary
Wood ct al; A NJ Carter VS. " q S \ nder-
son. Butord ct al " ) y Paterson ct al;
J W billiard vs. T l. Westmcreland, a a
Die erson VI q II Ussery. Newton White
and wife ct al rs Helen NJ Butord ct al; @
w McGrew V NJ W Whar on ct al; J 7
Fisher vs. Joseph Howard ct "a; J II Lester
vs. J II Morris ct al: n SIuithson vs. W n
McGTew ct al, a b Garrett ct al vs. jesse
Perkins ct al: Jno T Garrett vs Jesse
Perkins ct Moore ct al vs.
W 5 Ncwbin ct al; T NJ Gordon vs. K N
Laird, Ex'T, ct al; Jesse Fry Admir-, vs.
a L McGrigg ct al; John Wright W Jas
Sands, Jas Sands ct al vs. Jno Wright
ct al; B Hamw onds VS. N Baulch, E and
J kdmundsOn, Ex'r, ct al " D NJ Waters
ct al; Ihos A AtcEIson rs Laura Martin ct
al; NJ M McLin vs. u NJ Mott, Furman and
Co, VS. ! L Mcmillan ct al; burgess and Co,
vs. L Mcmillan ct al; Cook Settle and Co,
VS. J. Mcmillan ct al; Martha DodsOn ct al
al vs. Il w Dodson ct al; Rhoda A Borup ct
al vs. Willis Bordp ct al; Jas Smith vs.
JOS Smith; J 7 MeKissack ct al vs. John w
Clack ct al; 9 Epperaoh ct al vs. VIM Simon
on ct al; j c Lester VS. Samuel J White ct al
Sam Orr Mary @ Brandon ct al; Jesse
Grnbbs Benjamin + Martin ct al; A :
Roberts vs. F G Jones ct al; 5 Moffett and
wife VS. ID f Rose ct al; JAS Tow send VS. w b
Roberts; J NJ Patterson, admir-, vs. } as Pat
terson ct al; Perkins and wife vs. John
w Clack ct al; II n Fort and wife VS. W K
W 0od ct al; DAVID Angus ct al vs. Gustavus
Angus ct al; Z q Jones ct nj VS. A J Rober Is
ct al; ! II Taunt - " ~ UpShaw ct al; Sarah
Davis Us John / Hardy; same W. Sarah
Allen: Alfred Hardy vs. Sarah N Davis; } o@
Townsend vs " Roberts st a.; g n [ rdway
ct al vs. Anna b Bramlette ct al.
Final DEGREES have been entered in the fol-
lowing causes:
Merritt Eslick vs. II X Brannar, d q Ussery
VS. jeff Gordon, w Il Oliver 3 > W II jackson
ct al; S Merrill ct al vs. John B Majors et
al; Arrowsmith, admir-, vs. II K Arrowsmith
ct al.