, 1875-11-05

schclu,ca NJ rates coll nnt bn n,el ~ rrimn-facs
sxensc nn'.l bs ish ;y "f asnary !s s ants'.
rtstrn of the ache!Mlta cf rac< not crsrnt4l to
thu commission NJ sle affen.o NJ e1oroM nn,er tho
1ct- nnt We view lilIk m but
AN AcrinEHrAL 1NCoSaNelTr
IN tue refpeet n1hrti nut rn"'i to such saffna re-
s1 "a 70 b. .s controlling rs" H.. T. ,srninlnK no
count tLc twrn.iet that which declares for nnust
"that dafcl,isnt 5ns1o ~ unJu.t discrimination In
~ r.sHs md slisrseA q tot ana e2n,,'ensast'n
an liz lin 1t A,j III, j. ,1ausrtri tor james Il 40.
lrsato md AAn't,c pslI, iron, quincy tn s1scoml,.
one one sar"'t Of anrtes coInn,nniy ra" ont,a sta.
nnl nut defendant, on The tth Of aIsrh 1874, tran..
'niss foe i,oiert sm!,hsi@ II 'saI af i.nr Roln.on,
"no carload u hnrrcs. chnrsiaa therefor only tho
he casrEnse Of sai rarioa of o..fs. contrary to tho
form n tho ssatntc" etc. The satnte oNnes III Her.
= n Tho Fealect to unjust dfscrEminst!nn a, pT'.
,tes i. Sec. In rrstest 10 seasonae rates, what
nGEMcn AND TAKEN AZ rn1A. ractE EVIDENCE
q tho unjust .s'srrtmin,son prohibited by a act.
chsrstns greater Sia anonnt 81 of ~ e"mps,.ation
s {s Il, ..,e. '3s;' ;as H. tann {, mo IN '.s s
freight of tlc r,ts greater ir.nce q lilo
vent h,atc Of facts wh!cl, hhpws violation ot tho
satMse ~ that there no asernens - I" Tho rerrott-
Ss s n & sea a II s va ss
chnrsc for les thrn for Greater datanre There 4
M Av.rnent whatever upon this head c,r 'u respect
or tia their weight or tho sl:o or eis,a
Of the cara containing them. or otherwise. Thu see,
cass Of different castGs anl nuurrA Tor iii defining
nnjn.t dlscrifIinaton tn RESPECT to rart, 1rnvdes
ha s @ H a,
load ~ roniet, CARLOAD "t l.nsees tleea nut, ~
our vov, .u,csn:iy show them to 10 "l!ko Gn.nlI-
ttca Ut freight or thu Glass;" The rules arpllca-
bic tho enforcement of rcnnl eatitcs rcGnl1u that 1t
ehuuid bc made clearly to apro4r that
THE rHEcIaE STATUTORY oFfENaE
has been committed. Being Of nrnun that the sta :
mnr.tr should hayD bceM carried back anA Sustained
to tho ectasAon. instead Of to thy pleas Tho }nds
Aud McA1lstes, I'LL.
D14AESTINa ortNluN.
Judges Walkor and 6chodeld filed tho follow
Ing dissenting opinion:
we concur IN reversing the Judgment in shia casc,
said to aasumo The conatntonay Of Tho act undtf
any q ne rss es s t to
deem It necessary 10 express our views at length.
Wo bold that tho 'rst, second, and third secions Of
the net create complete 0fEenscH independent Of tho
eighth section that ths fourth section imposes penal
.ies for their ,.oat!on that the eighth section only
erY Of the resIty, Who.her that section is valid md
Ina clanEe1 the rule does not "a wo think, arisc on
tho sadgs' a.. sad sn only @ pe.snted en- H. fe.
shal bo offered in ositeucc. Nc bold that
tho ayerments contained in the tweneth count show
and TINT It II good. These sections define thu oGcnao
Of unjust discrimination. and ths sTermsntn show
s reseat efsnso 10 the enarse of unu.t dssrnins
lion for the Of cars. and tho atatuts las declared
tll.. tho facts sate Ii, thi, count ,r'a facio
chicago i Alton Railroad Company v. Tho
reop'o IN IT,. ~. where II waa held that
thn {1GncraI AE1cmhlY hAYD E0Wnf tsC1rn that