The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-01-19
OF No. 1,451 Third avenue. He was neld to answer
In default OF $500 ball.

~A~' " AAV4 ~, ACsts Iva
OF No: I;4'l Third avenue. He was nsld to answer
IN default OF $500 bail.
COURT CALENDARS DAY.
SUPREME CoURr-CHAMBERs-Heid By Judge
@ @ e s Il is u 81 So So sS l2'
SUPREME CoURr-GESERAL TERM-Held by
Judges Davis Brady and Danels.-Nos 200, 2ol.
202 2Ol, 205, 206. 207 POS, 209. 8, 49, 49, SO, 90,
1875 l2e l27, $780, las, 1873. 2os, 1885, l42 lag, 2ll.
suPREME CouRr-sPEcIAL TERM-Heid by Judge
iact-Nos A. 49, 81, 9s, l0l, 46, 81, 81, los. ITO,
lls Ia ll5, 49, g. lis. S, lS, III, l32 10, 49, ~,
:, SUPREME CouRr-CIRcuIT-Part 2-Held by Judge
Van oo Worss 81: $780, 1924 7o2 s5ss, AL 1918
s., Il2ai $50, 4ios, i5ssJs 4es, AS. is4 Part 3
Held oy Judge Lawrence.-Nos 2o77, 7es 1861, 1895.
YS s' ss s ia aa'S 30 S2 Ss Iei ss i5s
SUPERIOR COURT-rRIAL rERM-Part 2-Held
S BY !gage sedgwck IN es2 So sos, s44 $685.
SUPERIOR CoURr--GENERAL TERA-Adjourned
until nrst Monday IN February.
COMMON PLEAs-TRIAL TERA-Part Held by
Judge Loew.-Same calendar. Part 2-Adjourned
&C COMMON PIEAs-GENERAL TERM.-Adourned to
Monday, the LIST day OF February, 1875 at eleven
SSup M s iR2 paO1 By the
MARINE CouRT-TRIAL TERM-PARr l-hed by
Judge Alker-Nos. HOO 81, lllo, 1855. lie7, s57.
Fart BY Judge aSs isS 1882
1921, 1857, 1853 1885, 1871, 1910. 2oas, 2s2 1885.
Psrs s2 sSS SS a se as a9s $780,
1880, lsSl 1880 2Sss 1880. 1884. 2o52, 1885, 24oa,
Co COURT OF GENERAL sEssross-Held by Judge
sutherand.-Ihe People vs. Robert Robertson,
assault ana battery; Same VS.. Alonzo Johnson
and sophia Johnson. grand larceny; Same w.
winder. grand larceny; same vs.. Bella Shaw.
grand larceny; same vs.. William Brooks and John
(,orRr or OyER Ann 1rRMrNrR-He,d nv Judcs
Barrett.-The People vs. John Snarkey, homicide.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
DECISIONS.
WASHINGTON. Jan. 10, 1875.
The Supreme Court rendered the following de.
csions to-day
No. ITS. Haycraft vs.. the United stares-Appeal
from the Court or Claims.-The question IN chief In
this case was whether one who gave aid and com.
tort to the rebellion can, after two years from
suppression. maintain an action in the Court OF
Claims for the recovery Of money IN the Treasury
under the Captured and Abandoned Property act,
The Court hold the question to be one OF jurlsdlc.
ton; that tue sovereign cannot be sued without
Ills consent, ana that as the law giving the ripht
oil action prescribed the time within which it
might be brought two years.. and It was not
! reign Is considered to be no longer existing and
the action cannot be maintained. The Chief Jus.
tce delivered the opinion.
No: l7e. sons VS.. the United states.-same
| court and same Judgment
~, NJ. SOL oniou raciuc hallrOao company vs..
NO. 400: Mcshane vs.. Union Pacific Railroad
Coz from the Circuit Court for
Court holds that the United States retain
the legal title to the lands OF the company
as security Tor the payment OF the cost OF survey
Ing &C.. and The States cannot be permitted to
defeat this right by sale OF the lands for taxes;
but when the original grant has been perfected by
the issue OF the patent the right OF the state to
tax Is perfected also, and may be exercised.
! No. l25. Doe vs.. Cnildress-Error to the Circuit
| Court for the Middle District OF Tennessee.-ln
Court OF Tennessee had jurisdiction OF the subject
OF certain proceedings in attachment no defence
and no having been taken to arres S
proceedings Of 70 transfer them to the Bankrupt
Court, anu there being no fraud alleged, a good
Chancery DEGREES. Affirmed. Mr.. Justice Hunt
! delivered the opinion.
cross appeal-Appeals from the Circuit Court Tor
Maryland.-rnis was case OF collision between
owned by Smith and others, and the Sea Gull, in
which the Court below divided the damages, find
This Court find tue Sea Gull responsible for the &C.
cldent and reverse the decree, with directions to
Value Of lnescbooner. Mr.. Jas:ice Cnord %n dee
livered the opinion.
No; 1885, 0chlltree vs.. the Iowa Railroad Con.
the supreme Court OF Mssouri-The Iowa Com
pany became stocknolder IN the Missouri. Iowa
and Nebraska Company, alter the repeal OF the
douole liability clause OF the Missouri constitution
and the question was whether under these cir
cumstances 1t was Liable under that clause for
debts owing by The corporation PRIOR to the re.
peal The decision is IN the negative, and the
judgment is affirmed. Mr.. Justice Davis delivered
No. 100. Longstretn, assignee in bankruptcy vs..
PennOck ct al error to the Circuit Court fer the
Eastern District OF Pennsylvania.-In TINS case the
defendants In error claimed tor one years rent
the law OF the State they being entitied to dstrsn
before the assignee took possession. The Court
below sustained the claim, and the Judgment Is
| IA no tha
STATED law. MIR. Justice Swayne delivered the opinion
NO. l26. Error to the supreme court OF Montana
Terrltory.-ln this case the question was whether
a right 10 running waters on the public lands OF
the United States for purposes OF irrigation, can
be acquired by prior appropriation as against par.
ties not having any title against the government.
This question Was answered IN the affirmative, the
appropriation, Tor any beneficial purpose, Is en-.
titled to protection and that tnis right Ia respect
1866. Affirmed Mr.. Justice Field delivered the H
opinion.
Circuit Cour: or the Eastern District Of T ec
nessee.-Thls was proceeding TO set aside sale
Of the appelee's property made in his absence
that the cause Of action which matured IN a
judgment against Shirley BY publication Of SER
OF foundation. The Court below sustained the
plea and vacated the entire proceedings, ana that
hvered the opinion. Rule 26 is amended as fol-
lows:-"lr, alter cause has been passed
the loot OF the docket, the parties shall
desire TO have it heard, they may file with the
Clerk their joint request 10 that effect and the
cause shall then be by him reinstated for call ten
cases alter that under argument or next to be
called at the end o. the day the request is fled II
the parties will not unite in such request either
may move to take up the cause, and iL shall then
be assigned to such place upon the docket as the
Court may direct. No stipulation to pass cause
without placing 1t at the loot OF the docket Will he
recognized as binding upon the Court. A cause
can only be SO passed upon application made and
leave granted IN open court"
LONDON MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT.
LOCAL TAXATION AND MANAGEMENT OF POOH
FUNDS