The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-06-17
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURT-cHAalBERs.

BY Judge Brady.
In the matter OF Richards-J. Y. Richards ana
Mary v. Richards discharged and custody given
Frost sas VS.. Van valkenburgh; Barnard VS.. Van
Walk nburgh.-Orders discharged.
Cruwly Va. decentralization granted.
Counsellor vs. OrteL-0rder granted.
Spettel VS.. Baucr.-Tne no airy did not read the
confession OF judgment TO the defendant, but of
tered to do So and she declined TO near II. saying
sne knew all aoou H. Inns xs,n is ea
underst God. The defendant denies knowledge OF
the character Of the paper; sne saws she thought
IL was note; she does not deny that she owes
the money. The order which under the clrcum-
stances viii be made is this She must JOIN issue
at once ana consent that the cause be placed on
the special calendar Tor next Friday, and pay $40
costs OF this motion; otherwise denied. Order to
Crowly vs. McDermott-The only defence in
this case is that no demand was made before &C
tion brought This Is not sufficient 30 warrant
tins Court in disturbing the Judgment assuming
1t 10 true; but there Is reason to doubt on the
papers submit ted. The counter claims alluded TO
can be enforced in another action. yhey not
properly, except the claim Tor storage, present.
able in this The defendant has, u may DC SAID,
Judgment against him was recovered several
months since. For these reasons the motion TO
vacate judgment must be denied.
Saarosey VS.. Saarosey.-Referee's report and
order confirming report and granting decree OF
Helienstern VS.. Ferguson.-order settled.
haden VS.. Buddensick.-Motlon Tor allowance
denied, without prejudice 10 receiver: su,.
Lathrop vs.. Godlrey.-The appear taken herein
Hobart VS.. Meyer. The payment OF 500 on
account OF the note in suit is utterly inconsistent
with the statement OF the defendant, and the
motion is denied. therefore, as one which is not
sustained by merits.
Gilbert VS.. Crsig.-Motion denied.
Miller vs.. Hallock.-Order settled.
Lyddy vs. Kenny Injunction continued, but
cause referred TO \. JARVIS, Jr to try and deter
mine. Cause may be brought on on notice OF five
days INJUNCTION contlnuea on aae s t9eory tnas
Mitchell VS.. Bunn.-Ihe reasons assigned are
not sufficient to warrant the relief asked Ior and
Mason ys. Mason.-Report OF referee confirmed
and decree OF divorce granted to plalntin.
la the matter oil ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS denied,
put petitioner NAV have an order OF reference.
In the matter OF Thompson.-Counsel must pre-
DAVIDSON vs.. Authorization denied, upon the
ground that previous applications OF similar
Character nave been made and denied, ana the
costs awarded have not been paid.
Lyddy vs.. McKenny.-Motion granted ana the
petitioner allowed 10 deduct $50 from the funo,
the question whether that sum snan alternately
| be charged 10 the paintin or defendant being
held IN reserve.
In the matter OF HAYS: Feneul VS.. Weber; Stadt-
miller VS.. Jonnson.-Granted,
Johnson vs. Erie Railway Company.-Motion
granted; cause set down for trial for the third
In the matter OF Cornel.-Tbis application must
be referred 10 AXE proof OF the facts. N JARVIS,
Coler vs. Kountze.-on consultation with Jus
rice Lawrence. ordered that tine stay be granted
on giving bond III $4,000.
BY Judge Donohue.
Ferris VS.. PecEham.-Motion granted.
by JudRc IaWTenCe.
In the matter ~ Lehmaier.-Granted.
Schaeier VS.. North and South Railroad Company
OF Gcorga.-Tne motion ior the appointment
snould be denled-
BALDWIN VS.. 5. and A. Telegraph Company.-The
motion Tor confirmation OF award and for judy
ment therein Is granted.
Kiersted VS.. Ba,les; Bayles VS.. Kiersred.-I
think that the application 10 stay the proceedings
In the foreclosure case should tie granted. There
snoulu however, be some provision inserted In
the order requiring the plaintff in the partition
suit TO proceed as rapidly a. possible. The order
an al cd baf Fpa n
Circuit, Part ,
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
By Judge Van Worst.
Marsh VS.. INSTRUMENTATION for new trial for
surprise, &C.. denied.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERM.
by Judge Loew.
Levitt vs.. Belt-Morlon TO compel plaintiff TO
pay costs, &c, denied, without costs.
Oesterrecher VS.. Jsgues.-Mouon TO place
cause special calendar OF short causes denied,
without costs.
Richter We. Sager.-Case settled.
BY Judge Robinson.
Voss vs. Her.-Case ana amendments settled.