New-York tribune., 1875-01-26

WIS inquiry now or, We na'o
avoided that; have resisted It as far n can. We
make mputaons upon third persons and would relieve
everybody except the immediate parties to this controversy
from any reflections which might arise Of connection with
this difficulty. II the gentlemen persist in introducing the
of that lady they do upon their responf
bity
Mr Fuleon-And may be necessary us hereafter II
the other side put make neces-
sy prove what did with regard that lady for the
purpo,e jusying witness They responsibility
Of the whole thing
Mr EyarsWe have diculty in assuming responsibilities
they cast upon rs do upon them in the
conduct Of our side in this But have not any reon'
sbty sbou what you do consequence Of what DO You
will do you advised We VIII take Of own side
Mr. Beachlt that you violating the order OF
debate and insisting upon word argument upon
objection
Mr.. Eyars-But you say always something new.
Mr.. Beaoh-No, we DO not ideas.
Mr Eyas-Now my friends have undertaken 10 present an
attitude sort of defiance upon this subec certainly no one
side Of the wishes make mpuaons upon hss
Proctor believe word Of either the threatened pub
lcstOn or the actual publication.
Judge Neilson-Why refer TO the actual publicaton'
Mr. Ryars-WeI because the actual publication in the
matter.
Judge Nelson-No It lie not IN It is not in, and with my
consen, II won't be H. as far this is concerned
Mr. EysrsI dare say it not but are not the hde
that be made the subject Of mpuon Of wishing prng
Miss Proctor in.
Judge Nenson-The examination win be as It stands
with the exception that Miss ProclOr will be stricken
ou: and shall be omitted hereafter Whatever occurs,
should allow any evidence vindcse that lady az Ger
sny should the subject brought up here properly
Mr. E,arts-Your uOnor VIII note exception TO that d.
rcction.
Judge Nelson-Yes 70 he hostility OF this witness
whether you characterize violent not; whatever may
be you have right 10 show tIat Of course.
s4vfO IN fir concerning what
YOU would dor A. Nr storrs that had unders'ood
that was not % be cross examined By the Committee.
Mr Tracy-I have reference to the publication.
Mr. Bcach-Wal moment
Judge Neison-I think he has answered. 20 on
Mr Eyarts-Tha took phce this interview A That
I understood that be eross-examined
by the Committee that I had come from
Lowell for the purpose Of that coexamuaon and that did
want Ms brother that report unt had an opportunity
Of being cross examined by the Committee; for his brother
did sign that report without giving an opportunity to be
ossexAmined he could possibly know the truth and that
report signed and II against me- az understood
be- should publication Of fac reply and that
publication undeno my advised IT, would perhaps
threshold Of his family and 10 see him as per
sonal friend telling H., did want 10 do any such
thing and said hm: 90" want you Nj Charles sIorrs' to
~ only upon the ground Of my being eIAmined T
your don't him TO sign that report until
IN opportunity FOR in order that the
facts Ea print may be fully known" That
is what said went Charles Storfs friend, Sir
have gwen a neariy a. recoiect IT,
@ DO you know William b. BarOcri A. Yes, Sir
DID you have conversation with him the floor OF the
Produce Exchange hree months on the subject
Of Nj Beecherf A don't rceoec whether it was within
So or three months had conversation with him on
Exchange about the time Of the Victoria Wood
hun publication, and rather snk during the time Of the III
ScstisAt.ng Committee.
Q Haven't you since The Investigating Committee A.
a it, -f-. .Iy .hpff . patx
cyer day Change when there and he is there
@ DiGnt yon tell him that Mr.. Be-cber was damned
perurer and 1euef A. don: Know whether told him he
Wa damned perJuer and iberne may have told him he
vas q pcrurer and lbeIune be IT, IA marnur in the
aud:enoel
Did You tell Mr. Barber soi don't rocolect whether
1 told Mr. Barb,r r not, Sir
Judge Nes0n-Wl the audience Keep qu'etl
Mr. Tracyaye you threatened persons with danger TO
thcn ives Il they testify behalf OF the defendant
A. No threatened persons they should testify On
behalf Of the de eIdant.
q dave yOd threatened any lersOn A. NO, have net
Threatened any person.
O. Did you threaten Mr. Armour hs yOu woud crush hin
II he should testify against you this tral A No, did
not threaten Mr.. Armour that would crush hin.
@ Do you know him A Yer be is not the man 10 be
crashed easily.
Of his testimony A. don't recoect having conversation
with MIN on the subject Of his testimony had conversation
with him in regard 30 an interview pupOred 70 come om
Lin. in The paper.
O Ye dI YOU state 70 him that you would crush hm' A
No.
@ Did you threaten 10 crusn him for anything A. No
O. Did you have any talk him about his being witness
on bs tral' A. don't think aid anything him about his
be nc witness no don't think DID, be not man would
such language TO, Mr.. Tracy.
@ Book produced ard handed to witnessl Now, Mr.
MouIton, during your interview with Mr. Beecher on
the night Of Goth Of December, 70, was there any
thing said BY Mr. Beechcr the truth alsity Of Mrs.
tons confesson Does your Honor permit them 70 90
back for the nth time that interview Of the SOthi
Judge Heison-We it the ground that some question
he think proper ie inadvertently omitted
Mr Evau.-Ths II question excluded. We ask him whet-
whether at that interview. there was anything said
by Mr. BeechG concerning the truth or faIsliy ef
that conf ssion--the queston-and there 10 no
rule Of law you can't do FOR the If time you can do
II the fourth But frst time the question has been
asked
Mr. Fulerton-Tbe first time question has been asked
but il is the fifth time the transactions Of the SCh have been
gone over and my objection ID thai they cannot s'ah W
again.
Judge NeilsOn-who were present.
Mr. Rysrs-It Is an interview between himself and Mr.
Beecher
Judge Eeilson-He has stated the conversation
Mr. EyartsThe conversation has been gwen now we ask
him whether syng said by M Beece concern
ing tie truth fay, either way OF ME- lH'oh ASeuba
ton
Judge NeilsoB-I think will allow that
Mr. Beach sad-Do you in direct do you mean
by implicauOni
Mr Eyars-We ask the question.
Mr. Beach,. nay be necessary the whole inter
view for the purpose Of telling whether Thing "s SAID
re.ard 10 its truth or It's falsityt
Judge Neison-Now read question Nj Stenngrapher
fThe last question by Nj Eys read by the TRIBUNE seno
grapher]
Mr. Beach, submit that that question calls ucn the Wit
ness to give Judgment construction IN regard TO The con
ycrsation which hs has already detailed.
Mr. Eyarts-Ths ia q crossexaminaiion.