New-York tribune., 1875-03-04
THE PINAL PARTING BETWEEN HUSBAND AND
WEE

WIFE.
O She did not speak then, of the cause Of her
leaving in his presence She said nothing Of leaving
her husband until after Mr. Tton had left the house.
O. Well ask you this question Did she not alege any
cause for leaving him that morning. in his presence A She
did not
q The only then that suggested was the rep
ton which had been had between you and
Mr. Ton prior that day The repetition Of the conyer
saon duplicating her guilt with Mr. Beecher
O. The repetition Of the conversation; A. That haG hGd
with Mr. Tiiton on the piazza duplicating her
O. Never mind charaoterze it, you have told what
conversation whether it implicated or not we Will
Judge You understood that morning that that the only
for the srliion did you not understood thai
that was the eausJ that she had left MN then for.
o And she gave other a. all in his presence A.
Not in his presence no. Sir II could give hef conversa
ton riding yob wouid under this matter better
O. Then the difficulty ia that you cannotl see II ID, bL'
mean that you would be better informed.
Q Yes want 10 be informed in legal way. Laughter
Now did Mr. TtOn, on TINT morning anything about h-
wfes returning? do remember anything being said
about did know that she had left permanently until
after he left the house.
@ Well you knew that she at your house A knew
she there
O. ask anything said about her returning to her own
house A. think not thai morning
@ What did Mr. Ton say. Il anything upon that subject
A. don think he sad anything after told him.
O. Did Mr. Tlton say what he there for A. He said
husband aud myself in regard to Elizabeth
o Then he spoke about this conversation A. He spoke
about the conversation.
@ Which had been repeated by you to her. A. The
yersation that had repeated 10 her.
O. And said Misrepresentation about
lie said he thought Elizabeth abored under misappre
hension.
O. Now was there nothing said about her returning home:
A. think not, Sir.
O Why you would remember it, wouldn't YOU A. think
| should: hut do think there wa, Mr. Fullerton
O. And Mr. Ton away without saying word aboutit
did he? A. think
Did not propose Elizabeth should 90 back with hmy
A. No sin because in the hail. leaving her my
charge
Yos Before that had she not refused to go bact A No,
Sir not that remember all there nothing Of the kind
as can ,eca conversation there nothing of the kind
said
O Then appeared to regard as separation, didn't he,
when hR left her in your civrge' A. suppose so.
O. Dnt you say snythng then in regard to that, A No,
SIR.
Well you thonght it separation then, didn't you'
A. didn't know.
O. Well what did you think about IT. A. did
O. he put one your shoulder, and another hand
hers, didn't he' A Yes, sir
q Brought you together! A. Yes, Sir.
Q And said Take care Of Elizabelh"' A. Yes Sir.
o ANY Kindness VOC her a Kindness shown II
nst" A. Yes Sir
@ Well dl,t you regard indicating separatioa
| thought 1t temporary separation Al any rss
whether wand be permanent, not, did lsot know
O. But Yea you SAID nothing about her gosg back A Laid
nothing absnt II.
O. You aid not issnirc whether here any siher
cause for paation this that yca have
| repeated, A. did not; no. Sir
Difvou take .ny interest in it, n Ny whole heart
| in it.
O Well why didn't you try to hna oa when this lady was
mt in your charge under those eng ccumstaaces what
wa. ihe cause Of all this commoton' As said before II
cou give you the ny ride you vsud under
stl.sd it.
| have given you what took place hat morning.
O Well trying to get something else' A. am giving
you all know.
HID YOU any reason fo not nquiring hat mornnsi A
No, Sir.
O Wbv il was that this ceremony OF pntng her In yonr
charge in that kind way gone thrngh wth' did
mol know why gone through with; knew nothing aDou
| O And you made no inquiry A | made no inquiry
Mr. Eyats-Now submit II your Honor please that when
counsel in pursuing the proper privilege OF croexamnaton
undertakes to with the witness why was that she did
not then presently press inquiries her answer Is proper
. nr remenherd d the conversation had had with Mrs
Tn,on in nv carriage drive; II tell you that will under
stand why did not
Mr. Beach--Wel who has objected to that'
Mr. Fuleron-wen the gentlemen viii understand that that
does proper evidence either under the ccu
stances.
Judge Neilson-No Sir; not by any means
Mr. Ryss- does become proper evidence you press the
witness as to the reasons operating her mind why she DID
M, res naures between husband and wife, because
she saw the action OF husband and she knew what had
passed between her and the wlie'
Mr. Fueron-I am pressing for the reasons, Sir thai had
their origin there that morning
Mr. Eyarls-Wel, then eonhne H.
NJ aeoehNo Sir but lls whole answer to nIa sDeeeA v