Yankton daily press and Dakotaian. (Yankton, Dakota Territory [S.D.]) 1875-1875, 1875-06-08
The Endless Evarts still Endureth
Judicial Decision in the New
II Hampshire Senatorial ii
Embreglis.
Thc Surrender or Band Of
Fighting Comanchcs.
And, sundry Other Items Of News.


And, sundry Other Itens Of News.
Kvarts' Everlasting 1&ort.
NEW York, June S.-The number
Of ladies in attendance at the Brook
lyn court room today was largely in
excess Of that of several previous
days, an unusual event for this attrac.
tive place for ladies to congregate.
Both parties to the suit were present,
aud at ten minutes past the hour
Evarts resumed the summing up:
The Post says the counsel began
by arguing that De whole contro.
versy vas ended,- 1t Gen.. Tracy's mar
ration Of his interview 1 at
Ars. Mosse'aiaxls72, was accepted
Is correct. This i.Gerviev was
brought about by Tilton and Moulton
for their own purposes, and -for-those
purposes - honest explanation Of
the situstionwa required. In that
interview they were bouad by what
they said to Tracy on that occasion
in regard to the nature Of the charge.
They both denied that the true story
was read in that interview, but Tilton
adhltksf ls.t M read it 80 T1sy
sbousth1t PSfiol, ! and this Was only
for its reading under the pretense that
the true story was designated as the
Woodruff scandal. Tilton circulated
it by asking advice as TO how it would
look when published, and this dissem.
mated the concealed scandal against
eecs,er But becsuse the complete
document as it was finally prepared,
was not read to everyone who was
made acquainted with its substance,
it was pretended that it wss not read
to any particular person who WAS asks
ed about it. So in regard TO the
Woodruff scandal; it was pretended
that it vas prepared Is early .syshe
spring Of 1872, and was not written
till 1872, because the complete article
did not COME to light until the last
named date. The testimony Of Pesri
Andrews was introduced to show that
he did not put the literary and philo-
sophical .ail-piece to it until the u
of 1872, but the body of the article
was IL existsace losg belore. .MopL
ton when flbllle1, coatradictcdG cd
Tracy on some minor points, but that
Gen. Tracy honestly and faithfully
undertook to discharge his duty il
the premises and that - any
man on the jury would Dc
he went to,the heart Of ths matter
and asked what do yoas charge lMr
Beecher with7 Eyattss cited the tes
timolny as to the part Of Tfscy 81 thil
interview and the answers. Of Mn, III
ton approving the charge 81 the latte'
TO be one Of improper proposals.. Til
ton refused to accede to any proposi:
tion to, bring the matter before re
spectacle comm missioner, IS he Away
shrank from investigation, until i
was unavoidable. He knew tha
whsa daylight was let into the meste'
expression Of his aud Moulton'.
treacherous conduct in the ..contras
with Beecher would leave no doub
ID ny I ils4 6ina % =
whss - beel oihg oa i II
.Aess vel sEatd ID til
impntatiohs cast upon MI. Tracy, i
was perhaps hardly necessary i
speak, after Whist had been said b,
his honor aud Mr.. Porter as to Tracy
being = xitsssss II was eoeoede'
thatshe -. fscea to by Deseasity.-
Reflections upon Tracy we've ia.regar'
I, to his professional employment
Eyarts spoke ofthes duties and right
Of lawyer inEregsrd q the espous.
FsN >, *