New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-07-05

soy whether his was natural or not. IIis li-ht
ne,s OF manner impressed mo differently at different
times.
Reporter-Dld his apparent carclcssncss az times iin
Pre- Is you VITA bslcin his iun0ccncct -
MIR. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. it did and sometimes 1t did
net.
Repmtcr-IOw did you regard the Letter OF Con
Mr HaistcadThnt letter isoated from the rest OF his
evidence could be Interrupted in different ways.
Report How was Mise Turner's Testimony REGARDED!
sr. IalateaG-I heard many speak of what she said.
Int ,he majority spoke lightly Of the weight OF her
abandoned. her Testimony WAS thrown oyerboard We
did nt 20 into Ttons actions only far as thcy affected
RepoYter-But when her testimony eontradicted Mr..
Tons as t. hs ideal home, did is not initiate against
Mr. IIalstaad-Yce with some Il did somewhat; hut on
the whole il dil not have the effect which slppoee 6
did IN Che world outside, where everybody was TAXING
Al hi, point Mr.. whelan o. the jurors csme in
to Saratoga. and Mr. ialsicsd had expressed an IN:
ontion OF going there the former hd called 10 inquire
he ready Mr.. Hastcad however, regretted that
he would e melle to leave Ncw-Yofk until after Au-
gust The two Jurors spoke o. wa; had ppearc IN the
rapers regard them and their fellows. Mr.. Whclan
sad De- would not say word If al TIE others dd
Sir aisead slil the sane, ana ten added taat Mr..
Murray had called hin Friday n.sht and asked his
ycws which he refused to give. Nh Murray ad brought
il1d "a, lpcct 'ei 'l'''ii. ipI ~ 'Is.' ~; ~,
Two gentlemen soon after departed and the c0nFersaton
Reporics.NWcrc NJ. Eoochars letters carefully ex-
aniGcii
Mr.. 1alstcad-They were examined very particularly,
in; We did no. vote On tue letters thcs Ives. BIT afior
examining and discussing them voted on the nam
question to see ii they had had any eject There
free Interchange of thought
L.! Iortcr-Nl what estimation was Mr. Bowen hel1f
Er. Ualstoad-i dcat know; ne IL . mystery 20 me.
EepOrer-Maa any ohtasc. such ~ thit OF improper
solicitations" conceded against III. Bcccbcr?
Dir. ualstccd-SOnc spoke or t.us and others hvOlccd
it. But the tlat 0 adultery, II WAS gene
rally admitted that other matters ought M. to c taken
into dera There controversies IN the jury
as Z, whole and also between Individual ju.J around
the room they sttogcthcr on looked ont Ot The window
and when they were lying down.
Ecpcrttl-Ilow uiuCh of the evidence did yOu red!
Air. Hdsteafl-We intug1latcd regular - ten or
procedure. Committees OF two floa each side were a-
POINTED. each OF ic retired by tscf 80 propose un's-
discussion Two set5 Of IL ,uIr.ea stcccd;
they reiuc ri t. writing and reported 10 ho meet
points al the vital part Of tne controversy.
n nine points alp"eiacr I've selected ~ ne
nori'y ana four ny ne majority Thy were Numbered
ana th.ii taken up iI!d discuss, I alternately.
Icuoltec-iiow dd Mr. richards testimony against
his sister impress YOHi
Air. Halajeadliis testimony discus ed, but net
much weight att chcl 20 il. boji sdes agreed Tat
II nd not amount 10 inuch there nothing ~ it, We
dd no. H. taking tie stand Voluntarily against his
aiScr some tncugli that ie c"Uie lea 10 40 -
did not. Ny view thai IL !a had remained ~
NcW-JtTay the subpoena would not have Affected him.
Ills testimony regarded. a. TIE W thca KIND q! PIE
siulpt evidence oven tis InI1,l.- adm tttd tul
kerortcs-Nbat cioct did Iiltons " True ,'oi3 pro
Gu,cI
Nj Hal.ead-Wc discussed tIic " True story" twice.
but don't TncuD"r lnUcl ahJl II.
Hcpo.tci-Nbat Is your opiGi of Mrs. Tilton
Mir Hsca0-Nc regard fer letters aud confessions
accordance Win tMc JUdgra cAasr cNld nee oly
thcy affected thc actions OF the piftios cont
CcTnad. Her letters 10 Sir IiiiOn thrown when
TIE question OF money dam ,ss was ahGn Toned.
in Ia 's.e 81 t.iru added, II believe the lTy 10 be
hon 4 II Who have done their Cuty cnnSrs n,nusiN ;
OF those wtO voted Nl-h ne minority could
see ny .hcir CONFERENCE.-The troubled AM s.c"iy
ftluilsu'