, 1875-11-15
THE SUPREME COURT.

S,EAp-sogKs OF nEcEsr uEcIs1oNs.
Tho following aro head-notcs Of recent dccls-
ions Of tho Supreme Court, generally Of oAses
filed at the Juno torn OF this year at Spring.
field:
MICHAEL nxoEL ~. CAROLINE nEat.
Hifn<st-lomjfttHfg af ATTENDANT IN SHh bv H1date,
for Laust,q I}ef Hustands Itath.The defendeut tsa
competent n lar own behalf 10 an action brought
sea1ed e 70 .ssos 1or e.".ns s deah
of hsr husband b9 selling hi h1uoF from
tug Of wheh to g. ,ts s tno ,or am
aaea rom Uss ", IL cvn.tnnna-Whers Wits kaows
tl,a faet shat hss husband has pu,ehassa Jug sf q
hor power prevent him from drinktng 10 such quan
NY a to tn!afe hfln BY breaking the aR os pouring
through fear bu. lcrm!t4 linn 10 IL In great excess.
from wh!rh death enslea, Ehe must bo considered ~
tng tho loss upon hefsef. ...e
4LtxAxbEn wlcxknsu4x vs. JEask Atross.
Aastuaar ami dAstIqnte-dss,qnor's 4 L,abtttY.-Whese
tho evidence shows thst the maker Of ~ Endorsed
pro,assofy nuts ,nsolyent At a maturity. sud
continued. and thorofosa = .u!t .gainst him would
IT,: IT, s.ssnes sss apo ~ ~ % @''e
sa'ne-Estopg.tte 10 Dtnylhat sats @onid lars Rtts
shortly after II. maturity informed tbs .s.lanor that
could a 20 psopssy 81 ~ p m'sss .noa ~ TnlGa
Of hl1u," Held. in suit By tho .sagnao sYsnat tbs
sas!gnot. that thia was sufficient to stop The latter
from iusstiaq that sult shoult! have been brought
sgaiust the maker and tac1t admission that suit
would have bern 1nayailihG.
rAER7Isa y. cuEAEx VI. THK CITE NATIONAL 2AKK oP
CHICAGO.
SlnmoHs-SuMettHcy ef Ne.ion 10 QHdsh.-Whste
'uot found, sud theruupon within ten Jsys Of the
commencement of the trrm Ahas summons ".
issued EeturnAbe to tho sans taEm. whish was tersea
anu tile continued and the defendant II tho nt1
term IL which the cAuAo was continued moved tts
Court 10 q4ash tho writ ssued heFeu." wairh Waa
oYeruied. Hetd that Tho motion defective In not
specifying which %xrs waa intent!sd, snd hsnee the
seoond summons issasI withta in i.5s ot tho term
should uot hays been tdt rbsutn1bIa ths suc
eeedinR term.
Fvsa-Uf Intumsraa.s on Land Conveyed BY Far
ranfv Died in 4etk1A on otA f9r ths Frefo action
upon ptoussoty nota gvea for ths purchase MonsY
ssysd by ws1rsntydeed With fu, eoveuauss that tho
lind wa not tss of iucunheanoe but was iueuulbt1.
I'd md charged with the payment OF certain taxes
amounting 70 f4&a.40, which had not Leep 1Ai4 Lut
ve4 9tl lou uon the land. Held, that &As plea wAs
bs4 on demurrer fsls1 70 ahow tAat sbs grsutsa
had pai4 Ii, hlcumbr4Hes oF had bern disturbed ~
] tAs pos1essIon Ut the And III consequence Of tAe
eofns--peres of Cara Required IN caA of Loan,
-WheIa u saip,a II borrowed without hfs, as lot.
rover IL bound 10 ezttaornaEt tare Of thu s2ue
and fur apy failure Of such duty resulting Ia Injury
| The lendar, tbs borrower will bs liabl<.
] EuEiy al Lap-fn Sdlt dpdtIst ErFFoutf.-WheEa
xAs boEfo.s property which i13ufo telos. !!s r.
x1rUr 10 tho court 10 allow dismissal to The huR
band appeal. w4sn boil, Lave been sued sfors
Jnatica Of Tho Esace. It would oo oheEwss lhs hus-
lAal Was uahla.
| WILLIAM !. uAE VI. oKozaE 1Auoa II A..
Hoka&stbad-RAstA toamtis9 Lot CeasfftHA Fart
| s.-Whe1s tho los upoa sekh the debtor sealdea Y