New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-02-09

any thing here, .J- ,el. 10
@ Well you remember writing the letter. and the occasion
| OF its being written, SUPPOSED A. Yes, Sir
@ But you say whether waswrittcn IN ls6s' n
think Mr. johnson wanted write something that my
| impression .f t
U No matter only got ct this date You cannot
give It, you ssyt No. Sir but can look on my memorah
dun book whether was in Tidoue In 1859 or not
O. OF course its face would be perfectly regular ''
| should be 1897 A. Yes, Sir.
Mr. EyartsI propose to read Handng the paper to
PLAINTIFF COUNSEL Your Honor has reached the hour OF
| adjournment.
| The Court here took recess until . T. NJ
| The Court met at p. m, pursuant to adjournment
Theodore Tion recalled and the crosscxamnanon 10
sumed-
Mr. Eyarts-IIave you able to x In way whether
that should be date of 1870 1902 sndng witness let
teri A. Ihave given any thought TO the SUBJECT OH
didn't 90 to my own house during the recess
Mr. Evas ito plaintiffs counse-Wi you give US the 1903
and $50 ttersf ITO the witness: Where this place oil
TidouteS Is that the proper pronunciation OF III NO.
| Sir.
O. How is 1t pronouneeds A. Pronounced "Tidiute'" L
| think.
@. Where itf A. In Pennsyvsns somewhere lieeWfeu
! there once; that is all know about the place.
O. Somewhere in the olregionsi A don't know about
| that now.
O. Now don't you remember whether You there In jan
uary 1862 January 1907 A. don't remember anything
| more the date OF the letter, Sir.
O. Won't you look ut this collection OF letters' lhahus
witness the book There dates in January lS6'
about this time A Are these correctly printedf
O. suppose they are know nothing about them Wehave
assumed them to be A. Well Sir what 90 you WISH me 70
! do with thesei
Ik over those Of 1870 and see whether those dates
supposng them to be correct would not be the year 1910
when you Tdoue the 9Th OF January and not 1907
think that certain letters have been put In evidence already
from Tdou presume they have dates don't remember
at this ectured there seasons than one
| or not.
O. But you would no, In Ohio the 10th IL you
were in Tdeoute On the Sh would you A. Well Sir can't
understand why.
Mr. Fulerton-It is very easy travel that distance
| Mr. Evarts-wel, but he lectdring tour Both
1869 20 and 1858 you regular lecture tour were
| you mott A. How is that'
O. OF 1860 20 and OF 1868 90 you were oil
| on lecture tour A. Yes. l think
O. You have read this letter. haven't your A. Yon handed
1t this morning. glanced at it hastily do you ae-
sire to read 1t!
O Yes; you may read it you wish to- want to ask you
whether reading the letter you then can recall whether the
incident which that letter refers occurred 1869 or 1868
prior to that letter of course' A. Yes SIR Mr.
Evars will tell you fix the date exactly Produce in
Court Ttons memorandum books diaries for the last
four or five years them away from the house IL
was at request that took this potege OF hers there She
will fix the date exactly by her diary.
O. talking about the contents OF the letter at all
| want the date OF 1t.
datcf A. May please your Honor the date is here-a Sh
| 1869.
O Do YOU think that is the correct A. should have
said date and then Mr. Evarts casts doubt
| upon it,
@ Can yon see by morning whether it is correct
or not! A. Well have access to Mrs. Tton's diary.
| O. We are not talking about her diary.
Mr. Eyarts-Nol mol have nothing to do with that.
| The Wness-I will look, Sir through my own
Mr. Evarts-Your letters you have the originals Of
che uxula on
10th OF January in both OF those yearsf Mr. Byars
have had the originals your hands Of all those letters.
@ have not read all the letters A. You have had them
| understand
O. All that have been printed have not had except what
| have read A. They are at your service.
O. All that have been read in evidence OF course but all
that have been printed been read in evidence but
you the originals here in own handwriting you can
tell by whether you in the oil regions on the Sh OF
January 1862 the 9Th of January 1902 A. Well Sir the
letters will speak for themselves There they are and the
letters speak for themselves think perhaps, my little
books Of record my little lecture notebooks of which have
several at home may fix the date do not though why
the date should not be correct as ii is written.
@ or course only that in the first days OF January
it common put the wrong That you know,
| don't you ! A. 1t is with some people, Sir.
O. Well happens to anybody suppose it certainly does
| to met A. Yes.
O. And suppose happens anyone Well now can you
remember whether Of Wnsed did antecedent
10 January 1869 or only antecedent Jan 1870? A. My
impression is that considerable period before that but
as said before my memory Of dates is not good unless
associated with some event which bears date Mrs Tton
| can tell you all about II, Sir.
O. WE'LL don't know how that is. 1dont know what she
has to do with A. Well, will tell you what she had to
do with it, Sir.
Mr.. Beach-NO, no.
| Judge Neilson-No.
| The Witness-I beg your pardon
Jndoe Neison-Don't Mrs Tlton again, please.
and III that refers 70 what has
been snoken OF here Moutons examination
as the wnsted Handing witness letter. A. Yes Sir
O And my ouy object is get the date Off can You
spoke OF it as being old story Yes Sir very Disgrace
full one too.
O Well dare say That we have nothing to do with 1t Is
only the question Of the that presented A.
posed that it was that particular that interested you most
O. We are quite that persons are scandazed You
NAV have been well other people but the date OF and your
knowledge OF important and II you can fix that by
an examination OF your original letters or you VIII take THIS
prpted pamphlet that will fix it, suppose A. will do my
| best to oblige you.
O Now At this interview between you and Bowen there
paricuarzation or reference charge had been made
against you to Mr. Bowen the part OF lady that
nected in some way contributor otherwise with the
per Of which you the EDITOR A. Not that know o. Sir
| nothing Of that sort mentioned
O. Well of course am speaking Of what mentioned You
saw then that at that interview Mr. Bowen did inform you
that he had accusation against the Of
lady employed in connection with those newspapers
A. No. Sir he in his life gave such information
| never, from that day 10 this
O. How did this part Of the interview then that related to
Yourself and yourself alone cOehat Bowen confront
YOU or that A. 1t closed in this way told Mr. Bowen that
anybody had yhng against let him invite that
person also invite to personal interview face face
in Mr. Bowens presence Mr. Bowen replied That is fair
O. And that the way that branch Of it cloedf A. Yes
Sir that the way it ended
hava ed at Mr.