New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1875-02-02

made amicable demand Of Aroni and
Abrams for their return, which was re-
fused; that he fears that said Aroni may
send them out of the jurisdiction Of this
court during the tendency of this suit, and
that writ Of sequestration is necessary to
protect his rights in the premises; where
fore he prays that writ of sequeetratlon
may issue according to law ordering the
civil sheriff of the parish of Orleans to
take into his possession said warrants, and
to keep them until further order of this
court; and that Aroni and Abrams be
cited to answer, and petitioner have judg-
ment against them in sOlidO decreeing the
warrants t. ot BE- his property, and have iudg-
ment for $3.50 IS, the amount of the war
rants, with five per cent interest from judi
cial demsnd: Writ issued as prayed for, ON
bond OF $500.
The petition of Leeds & Co., q CONNER.
cial firm Of New Orleans, is that the Mis-
sissippi and Mexican Gulf Ship Canal Com
pany is indebted to them for $500 05, with
legal interest from the date on three promis-
sorry notes made by its president, L. e.
Folger, and they have judgment for that
sum and general relief.
AN INJUNCTION.
On Saturday, on the petition of State ex
rel. William It. james vs.. +. w. TOstrick,
an injunction was granted prohibiting Tos-
trick from intruding into or exercising the
office of inspector of weights and measures.
RelatOr claimed to be the legal incumbent
and to hold q commission from Governor
Kellogg, dated January 9, 1875.
Fifth District Court.
Mrs. Virginia C. Howard VS.. Philip Wer-
lein.-In former proceeding, Philip Wer-
lein Va. Virginia C. Howard, No. 5l2l,
Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff.
fieri facias issued and the sheriff sold
hOn0Qhn1A furpitupra nnGop nofonAont
instituted suit to recover $500 of Werlein,
alleging under the former ruling of the
court the property was not liable to seizure
aud that 1t was necessary to carry on her
business as clearinghouse keeper. The
ruling in No. 5l2l, 40 tar as it exempted the
property from seizure, was erroneous, by
reference to C. c., 27O5. 27O9, 32l8 and 3213.
Diffey, an identical question being raised.
the court held that "the acts amendatory of
article GA c. p. were never intended to dis
turb the rights of the landlord established
by articles o705 and 27O9 N. G. c."
In Disban va. Emma Picket, NJ. Site
we'll. intervenor, the Supreme Court
held that article 2ss c; P. may be
with article 2709 N. C. c. The amendments
of article GA Code of Practice can not i'm
pair the two articles of the Civil Code
quoted. because, as the Supreme Court
says, the law never favOrs repeats BY impli.
cation. See 5 An, l22; art GA, G. p. and
the amendments OF 1924 have reference
to the execution of judgments which direct
the pay ment of sums of money, and not to
the privilege Of the lessor. his obligations
and rights. The articles 1918 and 1919 are
emphatic and very explicit, and it GER
tainly can not be commended that they are
repealed or in any manner affected by the
amendments of article GA Code of Practice
There must therefore DC Judgment for de-
fendant.
Superior Criminal Court.
Judge Atocha was able to hold court To-
day, routine business was transacted and
the jury for February impaneled.
First District Court.
SENTENCES.
Larceny-William Bell. ton DAYS Parish
Prison and costs; William Spellman, SEN
tence continued.
Wounding less than mayhem and assault
and battery-JOhn Malone one day Parish
Prison and costs.
All cases fixed for trial to-day were
continued.
1t is ordered that the jury commissioners
draw the names OF thirty-six additional
jurors to serve for the present month.
Second District Court.
The SUGGESTIONS of Manuel Auto Marine
and Henry Rose opened.
Suit Observation-Disclosures NJ Conror We.
Benjamin +. Brashear.