, 1875-10-30
TI7E COURTS.
argu.nents in tho Haverly.Hooloy'
Maguiro Case.
roIurlary md Involuntary nnnkrupts...
Judgments ami Mem suits.
n. Case Of Divorce Lawyer Goodrich Argued
" Defendants Counsel,
THE MINSTREL WAR.
4 DAY or ARGUMENT,

THO t.ar Of n,inBtreiay ngain sl.one rcsp!cnleht
rr,,eranv ssors'inE In sha CiEcait Court bssoys
115ee Farwnll. whero thu arguments In tho caao
effI,ve,7 against 1funIey wero continued without
i,,o,fercnco during tho cntsra tlay. Tie ovl.
derto be!nr all in, the contest LAS nos rrHofycl
,.aif tsowl, to n war Of wossia hotween the re-.
.rrctiyo ra1tnecl, with JnGn Farwell nB hrbitor.
ifr, Willard resumed Its n1euH1eut In behalf
n, Nr. 1Inntev. Rrtl ssAs frequently interrupted
,,,} Judge. 1ilo nrinccd n tlcairo to hsing tho
,,st.tr NJ near to point M noshfh!o. 1li4
uuot I,.a}ty 8sggestc1 that. to lsia sn,.,h, tho
mi, roint III thu ra-ct SnA. ilas ffnsUrly b3foro
i, reaYea no:ice ct lIaolsg't, interest, taken
snra sloia M would ensttte lIiM 10 hold M q
nj, coun'ol argued that f1a:eTty l,al put NO
nb:cy !Nso tho eoAcer1., and. therefore, l,o
.tcull not no allowed to rennln there to tho
Lsa Ut tbs rnr-y Vhonn monny waH In II. nua
qka BIZ olHity, was entitled to q imrtlon Of
uo n5o.is. lie nlha argue&l thht Iiaycsly had
,tauIsGt opportunity IL l!aro notico tint Ma
na;1s toll lul that 1loolcy wag partncr. mud
l.ye,,y ought 10 ha:o investigated the coitfi-
sisa Of thutGf. and that tho tlcntion Of part
cerrhp put !,n 0n l,iH grarl. aIst! a:nosln:od tn
r5,iss Hut tho Court satI that tfaserly'a cot,-
f,soI Of MIA: Mag,1ire pasd must all b8 taken
to.e:'lcr and that EIlcn alagure ssii Hoolrv
rs psrtrsr. 10 niNo eai1 THAT he co ,}t1 ttrnp
hn Il any tina. uayoriy had right to bc
ta;AaEa Will tlht eiAteIAeHt WltEuIe laaE-
rg any farther; mud u would laso boc;'
hnhssul. to Mature aa1 iiayes!y Gone among
ia employees or others to nsce-tnn II hIs lna-
y, Will ,Iayl1irn WIN all right. II liooley hnd
Leu about tho nroLlIHcn, or his tlalno had M.
rsareA On tho bills. e.e., t,1a: fMo. wat,i have
ttet,J mattcr:i.' liH fIonnr illustrated this
ria! By referring to oac os our largo Wholesale
bm.es: II. for example, Il re,BUi sAsut into
}el l. Lcltcr'H etorc. l'o tionght l,e would be
pesfscs!5 intthed in regarding those gentlemen
t,lhs proprictort. aud !. wo1d 10 unnecessary
nd oIgnh,ye to 80 aroili,d au,nny tho e1nrloyss
10 asoe aan il thla val sho fnct.
Ceuascl It Piled TINT Mr.. Wstittalcr waa st tho
At31e Al Treasurer to REPRESENT hir. ff9oluy,
III aiJ loot: afsor Mr.. lloolcy's slnra "l tste
ctoau, The aiiihaiits s!rnn ths rotn. wero
teou that question.
Hyas uaw nearly noon, when Mr.. Conetautiuo
opened tho cn3o Oh Echslf Ut Hasor|y. 1fo
nmply tlado 1.atenent OF compatiant'A siln
1t tho ta@e. leaving tho henry worss 10 his assu-
aatc, -........
ur Hardy them began tis argument. Thicl,
hsted yearly tito entlra Afternoon. lIo pni1
III. eu!ar nttention 10 tho rointa rat ed by tho
otbotng counBul whcl, ho proceeded to att
tatr Eetihtir,. After iAyins. pAd Aib rearccts in
this nanrer, l1o launched lnto the legal nBpectH
Il tho caao with grent vgor. RulBtantinting his
lsn.,ks by ftoIueut rclercucca to a,1sLoritics,
iolit tho counl1csa loyal totneH that covcred
stsr7 avai!ablo spaco nuag ~here atf.
Lady Ka4 epeAsl1IR Vero nuy indication
n tito force Of lis argument, 1t n.lGnt ba
su1 that ho Gllccecaed well; hub as
counsel GU tho other gido wcro c0@aily we'll pro-
,Ilsd Etsh these documents It would not bc Hafo
n1entaro au opiuon on that hypothesis.
haen Nr. Hardy Ind concluded 1t was nearly
Esst and ;ts Ifa,nas had 3nss time 10 ret fair
i!sartel In I'll effort to den,o}inil all that tho
tAAt: aide i,aa YaiA heioro tho Count aljonzna1.
itts probable that tl,iA louy-sawt. caro- will 10
sntudel tIl4 morning, nnsl 1t il expected that
luke FarWell will tAoronpon raudor lis de-
cknn.