The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-03-02
INTERESTING PARTY VAIL CASE.

ton to RESTRAIN John Fettretch from using her
wall as a party WALL ana also from carrying said
wall back he depth OF his lot and raising Its height
Judge LoeW ned his decision In The case yester-
day. He held that the defendant should be en-
joined from extending the party WALL ms IS
important, as determining tne rlgn.s o. tenants
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURr-cHAMBxR&
BY Judge Lawrence.
Muller VI. Muller; Grumpy VS.. Baldwtu.-Aemo'
Horif vs.. Cruger.-I think that the examination
Hogan vs. Oakey.-Upon payment Of $40, costs
of motion. the plaintiff may set case down Tor
:rial on first MONDAY OF April Term and serve
notice OF trial Tor that time.
In the matter OF Harris.-ln this case the proofs
on the part OF the city have been handed IN, but
the papers originally presented and which were
returned for want OF such proofs have not been
In the matter of Ferris.-There isno proc; be-
fore me that notice OF this application has been
given to the parties interested.
Hirsh vs.. Hirsh.-In this case ! think that
there should be more spectnc proof OF the previous
marriage OF the defendant.
Graham VS.. Currie.-Motion 20 strike out parts
OF answer denied. with $40 costs.
Lewis 8. ROss.-M0tlon TO ne supplemental
answer denied, with cost OF motion.
Hyman VS.. Brinn.-Upon payment OF $40 costs
OF motion and the Defendants costs before notice
Of trial thus % MAY 1e set or the sa on the
dismiss Is granted. with $40 costs.
BY Judge Donohue.
Ramp VS.. Burgran.-Memorandum.
Wswell VS.. Ireland; Alton vs. Ledraid.-.
Hart vs.. Observation-Disclosures.
wheldon VS.. KrideL-Motlon granted; costs to
In the matter Of the application Of the New
York Central and Hudson River Railroad Com.
pany lor the appointment Of commissioners OF ap-
praisal OF land OF the metropolitan Gas-Light Com
pany.-Appncatlon granted.
SUPREME CoURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van Brunt
SimDson va. Dillon 2L-MemOrdndum for
Getty ct al. vs.. Devlin ct al; Holloway vs.. ste.
Chetwood VS.. Cnetwood.- granted by
default.
SUPERIOR coURT-aENERAL TERM.
BY Chief Justice Mcneil and Judge Freedman.
Goldberg VS.. Douanefty.-Ordsr Overriding the
demurrer an1rmed. with costs. opinion oy Judge
McMicken ct al. VS.. acknowledgement az
nrmed. Opinion by Judge Freedman.
HOFFMAN VS.. Ireadwell.-Order sustaining de-
murrer affirmed. VITA costs. Opinion by Judge
Mcneil.
Roderigas, administrator, &C.. VS.. The East River
Savings Institution; Roderigas VS. same.-Judg-
The American Corrugated Iron Company VS..
Eisner ct al.-Judgment anrmed, with costs.
Richards ct al. VS.. Woodruff ct. aL-Judsment
affirmed; Opinion by Judge Freedman.
BY Judges Mcneil anu Van Worst
Rae vs.. The Mayor, &c. OF new York-Order
anirmed, with costs. Opinion by Judge Mcneil
Hale vs. The Omaha National BanK-Judgment
aflrmed, with costs. Opinion by Judge Speir.
COMMON PLEAs-aENERAL TERM
By Chief Justice Daly and Judges Loew and
j. +. Daily.
Seaman vs.. The Mayor, &c.-Judgment reversed,
new trial ordered; costs 10 abide event; opinion
baden ct al. VS.. Acknowledgement af1rmed,
with costs; opinion by Judge Loew.
COn!in Cantrell.-JudgmeAt af1rmed, with
costs; opinion by Judge Loew.
Thompson VS.. Lumley ct al.-Judgment reversed,
new trial ordered; costs to abide event; opinion
Groez Va. Daly.-Order appealed from affirmed
with costs; opinion by Judge Loew and Chief JUS
scnukraft vs.. Ruck ct al-Judgment reversed
and judgment absolute for defendant; opinion by
CnieI Justice DAILY. III
Fallon, BY guardian, &c. Vs. The central Park,
North aud East River Railroad Company.-Judg.
Dent af1rmed with cosss; opinion by Cnief Justice
Aston vs.. The Mayor, &c.-Jpdgment annrmsd,
win costs; opinion BY Chief justice DAILY;
The Andes Insurance Company VS.. Loehr.-
rearRument grained. No opinion.
the Huguenot National Babk VS.. Studwen.-
Judgment reversed; new trlYl ordered, COSTS to
abide event. Opinion by Jndgf Larremere.
Hastings vs.. Young Judgmept reversed, with
costs. Opinion ny Chiei JustcelDaly
COMMON PLEAs-EQUIrY TERM.
BY Judge Loew.
oatey vs. Fettretcn.-See memorandum wita
Kenney VS. The seamen's Bank, 8c.-Judgmens
Taylor vs. oodridge.-Judgnent for defendant.
See papers with Clerk OF Part l.
COMMON PLEAS--SPECIAL TERM.
BY Judge ]. +. DAILY.
eastman VI. Martlnson.-Case settled.
Greedman VS.. Stuart.-Orucr signed.
MARINE coURT-cHAMBERs
BY Judge Alker.
Stout vs. Barreman; Schermerhorn Vi. Carter
Farena vs.. Decker.-MOtIons denied.
Fosdeck VS.. Wines; Wills VS.. Donel: Ellsworth
Vs. Peters; Kidd VS.. Petersen.-MotIons granted
on memorandums.
BY Judge McAdam.
Feuring vs. Robinson; Allen vs.. Asbestos Felt
ing COMMUNICATIONS granted.
Richards VS.. Ellison.-MOtion to open default
granted.
Hyatt vs.. Smith-Motton granted with costs
and $25 allowance, unless conditions are complied
with.
BY Judge Gross.
Schlader W. Eyans.-M ton denied.
Klersted vs. Eart-Oruer for substituted SER
vice allowed.
BY Judge Joachimsen.
Body Vs. acknowledgements for plaintiff
$1S4 II.
Kahn vs. Acknowledgements for plaintiff, &147 90
Pleuss VS.. Capmann.-COmplaInt dismissed as
not stating facts sufcienJ TO constitute cause of
action with costs
Meyer VS.. sloessel.-Judgment for paintin,
$147 90
COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS.
Before Judge Sutherland.
THE GRAND JURY.
In the Court OF General Sessions, before Judge
Sutherland the March term was opened yester.
DAY morning. Assistant District Attorney Nolan
represented the people. The Grand Jury were EN- .
nanelied and John NJ Alcott was appOnted 10