, 1875-05-17

nfaaAo NM hocesAty ID Iuste this requirement. then
'a hs e,ass c,s ss S'ysa ,, PfoaxS.s oa.sa
fsops 4. = :Pis' H. d. j. i T. w;n G u IT, 1s"n
Indeed, II might we'll TO ,,rsei that not only was
anst"rty conferred 10 hul Tho bridge. hut that lht
da;J "; mro.od !, build !. .. rars q Il: "ne o!
fho oom,ny 5oasp M s nsa 20 ss
.s., ,s,t; = g tssds. she s1en 10 \ by s 9
icrriss sero.a tho Missouri isrr md o;hcr rivers
Whlch ~ road may pass IN t.s cuurac," and 10
AIuct tfdNaA over said Missouri ItfSar An all othts
r!rtss. for ihs convenience 1t IL road" ani To sna.
With other fo.ds,"
..Atridse hnt under authority Of the act Of 1se7 Of
istt would he part .! TIN rord of The Company or IN
;hs Language Of the original charter {Hsc H. part IT
nae q railroad construoted firm roin. he
MtaIefh boundary of the Balls OF lows - jnat ~
nEldEe On highway has often hcou held to be par: Of
'hn tesahr,y sstrs .s1 Don Nan cSrp So s;s
to n.a bcyond tho middle Of tic river md 10 60 10 the
iowa ano.e the orsina! charter Of 1so! n ers ~.
s.anst III mvsr to ~, n1uso o.ss s
end Of II shall rent upon tic lnwa slnro md ls Il
dens 80 Gongrc*a dtc1ato-, ITO enable thu unlon
nsct!.ns With othcr roads.n The bridge WAS to ~
| oiit ny The Union 1Acih, Railroad Company. No
ssp. cr brss 4 tao u aGt
had rot nten built unler authority thus conferred,
snd 20 oihor. thsre could 10 no ab. tia. II wou'd
hase been part 0f tho road Of lhe CaHrsn{ lu slch
% ssn.o thas tho oomrany wonld haso bean hound to
y nppesrs from tho rcurn to tho ntternss'vo writ
taat tno COMPANY, nndss tho authority thus glsan,
dnlcnt and ezpenalro undertaking; aid IN ISL Tho
consttueston waa fur from being completed. On the
s q s 1atSs4.s psSs.5 e : ye GsSs r
rsn{o issue lts honds I, construct hrtaga scrosa
ihc Mi.tonrl River 4 0maa, Nab, md Council DiuGp
This enactment ia ti s5pipossd by Tho do,sndant 10
hssG controlling effect on hs present controversy
u ta ' &. e. sssst ssns e ts c
authorizes tho Unton TAciAc Railroad Company to
naks mortgage ION thu bridge and approaches ats!
Pop, 70 10 secured by sush mortgage.
EosW1ths'fandinE tho rli!s Of .w slst authority to
the alls argument os liz reisiors counsel Oh shis
Int y Il ele.t to our nnda th.s Congress gave BY
ts sct to the COMPANY tho rst to "le1y and collect
n tls second lroYeo tue "rower at all times to regu-
ase said bridge and tho rates. for tho tr4nsrortaon
hcrenboss reaea for" @ i mnfss o nen
ths language !,a. tolls sn charges other than those
tor local trarst xssn ooncmriated ~ tatng within the
competency Of tho Camp11y to levy and collect for ta
GrdEo - see,srity would b ths toll.i .nA the
tructare and .pFfolshes s!thout .5e rgat to
Iery Tolls aud plelga tlio taac to tho lentcr Wouil
noaOss' 40 . an,s psnyea barren Inwer snse would
Il = eIi,lent from tho tenor Of tho bridge mortgage
tat ~ y sa1 raras to that Instrument thus understood
. The sct eontaus al.o shs Important rroyston, that
shall nos change tho EASTERN terminus Of slo Un
inn Pacific Railroad from tbs r1asc wisets u is
fto u Obligation: nnder cisns ilws" It ai.o COD.
hrags sn sI aIaa'tisn, pfov,iqa Of IL Isidss .s
July ~ l5tN. 1T Statutes 1t Llrge, 2&4.1 THO act
"so constructed ~ o pro1is for hs psasaeo q ord
nary vehicles !" but this psiFlcgs wls mol used ind
rAo Bridge act Of is7i It is tn bo oustrrca, does not
profess to rspeal the previous authority cypress
inflcu on The part Of tho Company to bridge tho Mis-
sour, but Gully To confer additional pows1s and to
make ,dlitional rfov.,o9. AZ shs provisions q The
tho respondent would havs, inter att, tia following
ffhtS any nowef II respect to he ordge II question
J.: To build y nndor she original and amended
shore 2. under ths aol Of ian. wa 10 iar lacon-
nected from tho road to authorize to be separately
to lazy and collect Lofts mud charges III. so Of tho
ss,e - BRIDGE Of compensation for tho Of 1t by
near Council nlufs sn;i omalia,-consress resssyin
taO power 70 regulate tho trags and tho rates for
transportation OF fFeIcats and passengers tho
es.nss tSa ahsa esns e..ern 1 .na
ton oi tho oompanyt rosd nor rsloase the Company
@ aoasss ss'E s eea.s a
:aeaa rsa.ta whsro 1, hsa before tssn en- estsS asa
and st'at tue exis.na obligations u tho uo1npany'
sprtnainE from "a. tae should remain Ia tuIl foreo.
mortgage rsains anforsclosei snl shs trIdeo Il IL
possession Of The COMPANY ihe Company must oper-
sts = ra os is road. which It hsa naYar ee..ed to
bc, although II may, unlcr tito at Of ls7 charge
grcss.
Three serern1 tim+s rss in the act o, 1862 {sec 1
Jnno ~ 1914, has Congress Required The respondent
ITO OPERATE md use its road for all purposes
g g sa e. sss psso aud sna
tn. lass set goes fsr to aIe il criminal O.,
panies ehor Of tho Co1nnanies, 10 rciiso ths to
opseate sho roads, Or elther Of t,eu thus desnon-
well ~ a tho fuaa constituting part ot ths systo
ise should L opslssd whoS. Irsass Or aan.ses. ~ as
cr1ninaion towara4 etaer parsons Or localities W.
wa ars right II The position that Tia eastarn ter
shore, then, inasm.sci ~ tko Bridge ~ Of is1i
npon which tho respondent strongly rn!ics declares
u. such tsFn!nas Eem.,n. unehaased. Xetv1sa.
standing that sct the conciuatOa necessarily folowa
th.t tbs respondent must operate la trzfas over te
bridge under Its contract. part OF eont!nuou. no
from teTnas to ts1iau.. sach % day w H.. iStn S:sn
.nf95esa By mandsmus wh sneh aps;,Go lsg!atton
.aa Unsea stsses s 10 e'tfet teat
is aas ssssa 3 es1sy IL y ses
is roed IL required by I'M" 5flo alas Vi. Itsftto
&C., &C., j. j. nsrD T. oo Fl 1d '' a's "a. es''rn Il.
supposa tie respondent should habituarly .tor Il.
Eua thea eastward Of .h,s rolnt, oily ran trins
Congress- that # could be compelled 10 operate aud
run s regular trains into that city And no IN thls
ease totoFe us IL tho bridge 10 which a track In
extended Ia 10 ba considered part Of ts road within
tho meaning Of tho acts Of Congress- se1uif.
log I to operate lts whole lne without
~ stanses aosico Of tha Company, puttisg p.sss
Ress And ahppers Of frsfglt to UNNECESSARY delay.
md expense ie In violation OF tho nty
when ~ COMPANY owes 70 the public. i u ~ In
detenaibls ols!ructon 10 tho public. II ,nalo by tho
Company with Third Persons, without Legislative All
obIectlonah!o th.tts !. nsda With .ts own employees
point = made BY tho respondent asaiuat tho writ,
on tho ground that the bridge structure ID not op.
roslta Sec. ~ u h1ed br the President but some
,i1st Sah do.n ths rtsss' II pont q tae setna
through &c. 10, md. instead of crossing tbe river
opposite thai section, has constructed ia fuad 10 = 10
tie location nf tho brilge from &c., 10 wa authoStzyI
BY N Implied effect Of tho act Of 1871 applted 10 tho
subject matter tito objection under cousjLoraton
falls. Originally, undtr Tho order Of rrpsdent Lin
eolur Tho trdgs should have hben constructed I'd ~ to
reach thu foHn ahOHn E1Hk nf nd nbpo.It. o.