The Eaton Democrat. (Eaton, Ohio) 1875-1903, 1875-12-16
U 3 o. N N PLEAS.

W.. II. u. hduiScy VS.. .. y. DaHSeT.
for damages on the ground of
in the sale of real estate. Tried
to jury; verdict for plaintiff, s 1885,
80. Motion for new trial.
Joseph Mills, ct al. Ex'rs. VS.. Mary
E. Trick, ct al.-Petition for con-
struction of will. Guardian adlitem
appointed for minors, and will con
strued by decree of the Court.
Cyrus Pottenger VS.. Jane Potten-
ger, Adm'r.-Tried to the Court:
judgment for the plaintiff, Sal, SS.
S. Christman VS.. L. W. Harris, ct
mortgage; amount found
due prtff, $71S,97. Decree for sale
if not paid by Feb. l.
Kingery VS.. Boyd.-Petition in
error dismissed; exceptions saved.
Kesler vs.. Huffman.-Petition in
error. Judgment of Justice affirmed
with costs.
Francis E. Barnet VS.. B. F. Bar
net.-Petition for divorce and alimo-
ny. Divorce refused; judgment a
gainst defendant for 5000 alimony.
Diehl & Paxton Brothers vs.. Ham
il d McGriff.-Suit an account; judg-
ment for pItffs, $l15,25 and costs.
CRIMINAL DOCKET.
State vs.. Thomas Harper and Jas.
Allen.-Two indictments for house
breaking and larceny. Defendants
we're arraigned and plead guilty.
State vs.. Charles Porter. -Indict-
ment for burglary and larceny. De
PENDANT arraigned and plead guilty,
State vs.. Thomas McCafferty.-
Plea of not guilty entered-L. C. Alb.
bott assigned to defend-tried tc
jury; verdict guilty.
State vs.. William Sheaffer and Lev.
Schleiger.-Burglary and larceny
Plea of not guilty withdrawn andtht
defendants both plead guilty.
State VS.. Jacob Himmeihorn.-
Burglary and larceny. Plea not gull
ty-L. c. Abbott assigned as coun
sci for def't-tried to jury; yerdic
guilty.
There was another indictmen'
against Himmeihorn for burglary ant
larceny, to which he e:-tered the pie:
of guilty.
State VS.. Thomas Harper.
State VS.. James Allen.
These parties had already pleac
guilty to two indictments for house
breaking; the State vas not We
through with them, and they wer,
each arraigned upon an indictmcn
for carrying concealed weapons, Il
which they each plead guilty.
State VS. Wesley Davis.-Indict
ment for assault and battery. Pie
of guilty entered; fine $40 and costs
Paid.
State VS.. Patrick Powers.-For as
sault and battery. The def't. plea
not guilty, but the evidence convict
ed him of striking his wife, "Biidy,
for which Judge Hume charged hir
$40 and costs.
State vs.. Jane Lock, Jesse Loc
and James Lock.-For assault an
battery. Plea not guilty; tried I
jury, verdict as to Jane and Jess
Locke, guilty; not guilty as to Ja'
Fine $40 and costs.
State VS.. Mary Bell.-For pet;
larceny-taking a tablecloth from
wagon on the Fair Ground. Plel
not guilty; tried to jury, verdic
guilty. Fine SIS and costs.
State VS.. Wash. Ozias.-On peac
warrant. Tried to Court; defendar
discharged. he to pay his own wi
nesses-John Moots, the complain
ant, TO pay balance of costs.
State VS.. John Maddock.-Peac
warrant. The deft. has just con
pleted a term of 3 years in the pen
Tertiary, and since his return HON
has been annoying his brother wit
threats of making his brothers vii
a widow. The Court heard the ev
dence and discharged the defendan
upon his promise to keep away frol
his brothers place. John went O
his way rejoicing.
State VS.. Anderson Toney.-Ir
dictment for shooting with intent t
kill, and shooting at, with intent I
wound one John Gray. Plea nc
guilty. Tried to jury, and verdict
guilty of the latter charge. Motto
filed for new trial.
Stale VS.. IIamil & Bidlow.-Thes
defendants believing New Paris
good place to open a saloon, tried tn
experiment. They succeeded in star
ing their saloon, and selling liquc
enough to arouse the ire of the ladie
of that village, who, finding the d.
PENDANTS deaf to their. prayers, caus
ed witnesses to be brought befor
the Grand Jury and IA indictment
were found against H. & B. The
FL. & B. "clme down" and surrer
dered at discretion. This was a
the ladies wanted, and when the de
PENDANTS agreed to sell out and qui
the business, they exerted their ir
~iucnce in favor Of mercy. The. II
suit was, seven of the indictment
were nollied, and upon pleas of gui
ty to the other seven, the Court fine
the defendants So in each case, an,
all is again quiet in New Paris.
There are several State cases We
to be disposed of.
Sentence has not been passed upol
any of the candidates for the peni
Tertiary, but they will be reported il
our next.
j. ". Goes to his Dungeon Cell TO
IN. Onyk J.,,n H. 20 ,.JTs,. -