The spirit of democracy. [volume] (Woodsfield, Ohio) 1844-1994, 1875-03-30

Mary + Palmer vs. Lucinda Mobiey
F.: Civil action; demurrer. of defen liant t.
plaintiffs amended petition sustained
ard plaintiff has leave to file a seconc
amended petition in 80 days after term
Isaac Moblcv rs Susannah Mellott e
al. Civil action demurrer OF defend
ants sustained, and cause ordered dis
missed Ruling on the demurrer ex
ccpted to
! Alan Hentaorn vs. Samuel Pancoyst
Adm'r ct al. Civil action; demurrer OF
defendant uverruiei!; leave to defend
ants to answer In 90 days after term.
! Simon. Dorr vs J. Z Spriggs ct al
Appeal; plaintiff has leave 10 file peli
ton in 30 DAYS after term.
Benz. Danford vs. Silas Dement, ct al
Confrmation uf Sale; sale confirmed
and Deed ordered .--..
Gipske d. Nieman ys Jane Bircher ct
al Confirmation of Sale; same entry
as IN above case.
Isaac TAYLOR Us Joseph NJ and Mary
Elrod. Revivor of judgment; defend
ants required to show cause, by first
day of next term. why said judgmen,
should not be revived
George Bowcry vs. n e. Henthorn
ct al Confirmation of Sale; sale con.
ilrmed and Deed ordered.
August Meyer va Josiah Wilson. -
G vii action, Heart IN motion Of de-
fenaant for anew trial; oyerraled, to
which ruling defendant, by counsel. ex,
cepted.
The Ohio Farmers Ins. Co. vs. C. P.
Dorr ct al Civil action; defendant, j
b. briggs, has leave to answer in sc
days after term.
Cyrus .MeHugh vs Levi Joy ct al
Partitions Cyrus MctIugh elected to
take the premises at the appraisement
b Angeline Williams vs John G.. Will
iams. Divorce: decree granting di
vorce on payment of costs
NJ. Burkhartvs David Hauck ct al
Civil action; judgment in favor of plain.
tiff for Ss4S 81.
W. D. Lowery vs J. Fl Mckee ct al
Civil action; referred to A.. j. Pearson
Esq. = -'Es
-LayearBrothers vs. o. F. Flint. Civil
action: Judgment in favor of plaintiff
for Sl64 33.
| F. Bainum vs. Nancy Bainum ct al
Partition; partition ordered.
j. E. Harmon vs. David Schank. Civi
action, heard on exceptions of defend
ant, No. l, 2 and to Cross examina
tion of r. R. Fenner and G. w. Call or
their dispositions filed herein. Excep
| :ion No. | ovelruled and Nos 2 and
sustained except as to the first s ques
lions.
! j. E Harmon vs H. K. Winland -
Civil action; same entry as in abov,
case. 7aH
| Henry Walter vs. David Houck ct al
/ Civil action; judgment in favor of plain
tiff for 1923 80 s.r .sg
| A. Powell VS. Jos. McCracken. Par
tition; settled and dismissed
| A. d Havely vs. Geo. A Beall ct al
Civil action; same entry as above case
Alex Buchanan vs H B. Hixenbaugl
ct ux. Civil action; Judgment in favo
of plaintiff for 1882 03. \, 4.a-ts :
Thomas Fl Ford Ex'r vs w. R. Ford
Civil action; leave to defendant to ans
wer in 20 days. 4.
Monroe Co. Bank.vs E Coen ct ux
Civil action; judgment in favor O
plaintiff for sl9S 81
/ MONDAY, ED INsr-W Dryfus
Bro, VS. o. F. Flint, Civil action
Judgment in favor of plaintiff for SIS
I3 .ES
/ Josephine Brast ct al vs. v. Borer e
al. Partition; proceedings of Com
missioners confirmed and sale ordered
/ JOS. Hodge vs. j. Nelson ct al. Par
tition; sale of real estate ordered.
Ohio VS. Z Henthorn. Forfeiture O
recognizance; dismissed.
| F. F. Cooper vs A. G. Carleton ct al
Confirmation Of Sale; sale confirme'
and Deed ordered.
VIM. Mahoney vs. D. T. Clark ct al
Confirmation OF Sale; same entry.
| G. w. Franzheim vs John Michel G
al. Civil action: judgment in favor Q
plaintiff for 1926 AZ.
| John N Genin Ex'r vs Samuel Petit
and wife. Civil action; re-appraisal Q
real estate ordered
! w. F. Hunter, Esq, is allowed s4(
attorney fee, in case of Ohio vs Nc
Hugh.
SAVE MoyRy-Tr ia we'll worth SAVING