New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-12-31
THE COURTS.
TWEEDS BAIL.
| SETTLEMENT or THE ORDERS IN THs CRIMINAL
sIrIIs ny IInnF DOSnMur.

| TWEEI)S BAIL.
| SETTLEMENT or THE ORDERS IN THs CRIMINAL
| SUITS BY JUDGE DosoHUE.
The settlement of the orders against Tweeds
bail in tho criminal suits yesterday before Judge
Donohue, In tho court OF oyer and Termncr. There
were seven RECON zances five by Charles Dcyn and two
by Alfred b. Sands. but in all the questions involved
| were substantially similar. The main question was
whether the bondan, when his principal failed to APP
pear could legally present immediately to the court OF
Oyer and Tcrminer why his bond should not DC
forfeited whether lie should allow his bond to be Tor
fetsd and then apply the Court OF Common Pleas TO
have the forfeiture RENTED Dudley Field presented an
order in each case recng briefly the objections made at
the time when Tweed called To appear by hs bonds
men, and then overriding those objections and forfeitlng
the bond in accordance with Judge Donohueo dscnion
Assistant DisrictAitorney Lyon objected to any 70
ctals being included in tho order claiming sbat tho '"f
iciture OF bail p0rie matter. sud That II The
boudsman allowed 10 appear nj I'LL that vas nclo
matter Of favor and what 10 might DO wa, not part OF
the record " the court but cxrusc request mado to
the judge
judge Donohue held that this view was wrong II waS
true tho DsirictAttorney was not required to give
special notice to n bondsman. but that was because
bonsmcu were required proper notice to produce the
men for whom they bail at the opening OF each
term and this held TO be sufficient notice Without
nny special notice In practice they rarely appeared
but they had tine right TO do and this order was in the
essential facts.
Tho particulars Of tho rccitas were then discussed and
judge D0nohue stIck a recital that the acts alleged
by Mr. Deyln not disputcd, holding that the People
net hound TO dispute them, and struck out stay OF
proceedings not pertinent t0 the order on an affidavit
Nj Field, but granted writ OF certi0raf In eaeh case,
which operates a stay until the General Tenn bear tie
appeal TINS taken.
The form OF the orders Il a. folows:
me Peorb fc., az, Wj,iam II. T,cesd-]le defendant
having btcn called and appearing. and Charles Dow
iin his surety being required % bring in forward, and
failing to do 30, il moved on behalf VI the People
that the rcozancc 81 the said surety he declared ioT
feed ard the said Dcylin appearing in person and By
counsel, aud showing Tor Ddise way t1e said recogn-
not and should not be declared forfeited r. fol-
j. The Indictment 10 5iicl, it claimed in behalf OF
the Poop. mat inc re'92iz ',s fts4r@ a, N. .i1
g. re records OF The court SLOWING that the Oyer and
1etninrr 81 Iune Term l-73 WIS continued rom time
hc ~ adjournment up 10 the 29th day OF Dc.O',er
1879. aud that on the Z9ii day o. October 1875,
final aljoarnnent .cok Place without any con
tiHua.cc The said indictment or o. any proceedings
thereon to any other term o. on..
Sow, ne DistTi't Attorney Claiming aat tois Cotlt
being orOpni0n that any and I'll oDpostion on the part
Of the said charles peyth 10 the forfeiture or the
said rccOgniZancc and al de.clscG t. ths said rCCOg
nzapce or tho forfeiture thereof, confined 10 the
Court OF Common Pleas OF the CITY and County OF He"
il Is ordered by the Court that tie said recognizance
D, and The same is hereby forfeited; AMI IL il further
ordered that the said recCgnzanee, together WIN
ccrth,t copy o. this oFdes, be MEL IN Ne Ollie ihe
q
judgment be entered thereon according 10 law, against
the said William VI. Tweed TIC defendant above nnlcd
sad Charlie, Deyln. lis sIfc.y, for the several
suns set lDrth III saiC rce0aii2ance.
The cero.an Is as follows:
lhe !eogle Of te STATE Of Hc,-Jo Z, Ge Cont Of orr
0ad TerHiEcr IN and (T he tty oid comfy Of NEG
York. g~ceiiaJ:
VksrrGs We have been informed by an afldaYt pre-
scntcd on behalf of Alfred t. mt. that . certain Oldc"
wf, made By you bcari: date the l3t day ~ Dccun
her 1879 whereas you directed, among other ting thar
ccrai, fccD snZ3ncc entered into by Allied q. 5anis
FOR tie lrpearsrc ~ Wliinm v. TWEED shUud re for
fetco ami that Judgment thereon should be entered.
And We being Wiling Tor Cyliain sous 10 b. certified
Of rr said roccc,Ccs papers AMI ordcrs ;'t al things
appeft. iniH- thereto justices III sIppme
Court af The rt-fousc in TIE City % NoTfork,
Monday OF January, &c. IL the oVc1iug ~ the
Ccn-ra Term 20 Dc there held thai day, 10 command
Won to certify aud return tho lud7r your seal
said Justices the tine aai place aptg d. that they
MAY cause t. bc done ug,hcr tEcrcupon Whatever OF
rian ara according law OHt to DE lone and have
YOU then and there THE writ.
Nnesa he Hon. h0ah DAVIS, presiding Jdsilce Of the
S..nr. "a Court in the FIRST Judicial Department., a.
Tia CitY Of NeWYOr,, the 31ti day Of Dc"omber,
ls7J. BY the Court. WILLIAM IS ALsI. CLERK.
tbs certi0.ari is udorsed by gic DOnchue IL suIta
bic form anI operates stay OF proceedings unt the
General In hear ami decide iGe Due tons raised. Tia
cont hoids an adjourned g-ssioa on Monday, AID BIZ
Fifi .ci TO TRIBUNE reporter that IA expected then
10 - pT pared to argue The alHcd