davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
CIVIL NOTES.

On an application to take two pieces OK prop
erty for the Eastern Boulevard, between Eighty
fourth and Eighty sixhsts, from Avenue To the East
River, and the other property included in the lines OF
Avenue Il. between seventy ninth and Eighty thirists
Judge Lawrence, in Supreme Court Chambers, yesterday
appointed Frederick r. Coudcrt Edward c. Shechy and
George III. Swords commissioners.
Harvey s. NettletOn, under an assignment
from Daniel ID. Orrell, real estate agent sued Edward
Matthews in Superior Court Part L. before Judge Curtis
for commissions for renting Nos 444 and 446 Broadway
belonging TO the latter Mr. Matthews defended on the
ground that no told Orrel his agent that he would
linn for renting Nos. AS and 45O, Nos 444 and 446
being the hands Of another agent The amount In suit
5000 with interest since ls69 amounting Ill all 10
5000. The jury found for the plaintiff
In the United States District Court yesterday,
in the case the United States against Otis n. Cutler,
the Jury found verdict for the GOvernmen Mt for about
So OOO Action in this case brought recover that
amount commissions, which had been twice paid
sales OF cotton when Mr. Cutter the Governments
agent for buying products OF the nsurrectonary States
United States DisrictAtOrney Smith appeared
for the plaintiff, and IL. L. Knox for the defendant
The will of the late ex-Alderman Tucker was
admitted probate by Surrogate Hutehing yesterday.
The testors property after the payment OF debts and
few small egacies is lett nearly equally among his four
children. One peculiar provision IN the will is the ting
apart O four Of $4,000 each to be invested and
held in trust and the interest OF portion given to
of the children during his her life The viii bears
April g. 1s75 and dspOses OF property the
Of about S2JOOOD.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13

%s1 ssss Z: aS ssss Sss.%
seph Coffin as White du%s 70. counsel Bills sst-
ton win but mus, se conne e TO- masrs tending I ::
Wnss must be- co@pesd by subpoena In he matter Of Fan.
this case do rot clearly understand what % 9fst
DOL aesir he counsel obecns 70 portion, o. the pra1, ,s
Unless the consent 70 refer is signed b. all The parties 70 me
sS % % G Ito ES s ." % c pSr Sa
sherman Application denied See Mcclure and Palmer
pei detendan. furnish further eI parac1lsrs
Gse e WIN % % 81 @ @ s s p l sn S@sa %
,p ant IN @ S DsTS% % ss o soG m @
ns n, Coo S raSnea Ss" mn ns ae '
IN tSe adsvs on whe e adaSs of ts parties s ar. n
w. Bw Win e II. ouo f. % sc1eon yG1 @ p to to, Hs
zileKefuscd for stated IN previous memcrandnn
Chase agt Horon9ier Granted Irnnt ast DE- Forrest
The Mayor ScI wish To know the nature Of hs action aud
avit having been anncxed rasi be Tsworn 1 In tie mat
ter OF pnbc sn , appGined
mE AZ onc Se Ssns cn. b % be- m fa @ o an
sixth National Bank as cheago and Atom Railroad Com
entered was proper, Phelan ag WaIker~'rier granted
Clark @ agt Goes.Tor'cI ,, granted d9nying motion.
Palmer agt Dn9n-tndnss settled More aet, Herrmap'
er%ieG ri1E' must De submitted Bennett as' o"A'"o''F'
Ssrrd@r Go Cemsg,ca! I, 1rBy Jnsso Freedman
Uranium for couns.) Oppenh,mtr agt Eencu zMemor,n
dun for counsel schwab agt Aarons ct ssouon sanoi
with SO costs.
BY Judge Van VorstPuchaDan ag Jaokson ir-Jnlgrcrt
plaintiff, and for writ
Ter agt aoricr scrence compute amount
due Ofdnge al agt. De WOlf al-B0sd apnrogei
Tempeon Johnson slMOton granted Inpn0r andum
Wireman aG- The Remington sewing Machine Cotpos tho
facts disclosed BY the aitavit-. this
granted besides the matter se up in this proposed amended
defense the contract disclosed by the
and proposed amendment is eXecuioy and the articles.
not such contracted for they should have
defendant detan articles tho
price agreed to be- paid poneroy agt shaw. Dsy 267
Common Pleas-Gcned Term BY Chief Justice
agt. McNamara The People agt -Iudgunt on
the recOgniLanco discharged
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
BANK BURGLARS ON TRIAL.

James Simpson and William Morgan, two of
the charged with attempting to rob the Now-York
Savings Bank and the NewYork County Bank in June,
1874 put trial in the Court Of General Sessions,
before Judge Sutherland yesterday Both banks in
the building at Eihth-aye and FOurteenthst. The
basement Of No. S3 Eighthayc, Immediately adjoining
the bank hired osteIsiby TO be used
The plans OF the burglars frustrated almost by
accident An officer passing by the bank the evening
Of June 26. 1874, heard sounds like the muled noise
made by hammer on drill against a stone. He sum
moued aid. and the officers made entrance into both
the bank building and the restaurant. The at work
fed, but almost immediately captured. The tcsti
of the prosecution yesterday in cOrrobOratiOn
this statement. The for the defense will be
opened ls morning, when the other prisoner Charles
Sanborn, will also he put on trial.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
A NOTORIOUS MAIL THIEF PARDONED BY THE
PRESIDENT.

LaWrcnce IiabcI, Who pleaded guiIty IN ApI1l,
1874 To the charge of robbng loterbOxes in this city,
and who sentenced by Judge Benedict OF the United
States Circuit Court to three years imprisonment at hard
labor pardonod yesterday by the President upon the
recommendation Of the Hon. Lyman Tremain. tho Hon.
David Wilbcr tho Hon. II. w Barry and, the pardon
states. "a number Of respectable citizens in Chicago"
where IIabel once lived When Habel arrested,
large number OF stolen letters and key which would
unlock any lettcrbOx in the city found upon him.
and officers whose business it to protect the mails
said that he the most expert lctorboX thief
captured in this country.
In strongly condcmning this pardon, United States
official stated yesterday that prior to his sentence for
robbng ettcrbOxes in this city, Habcl had plundered
such boxes all the way from Chicago to New York. and
that if criminals like him to be pardoned after
ing bnt one year in prison, the United states criminal
courts might well he closed. The official also
said that this pardon had political Significance
MDiCh MO uld yet bc nlade apparCnt
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
THE MADISON AVENUE EXTENSION.

A motion in the suit of William II. Gebhard
against the Mayor made yesterday before Judge
Lawrence the Supreme Court Chambers, for injunc
tOn restrain the imposing of assessment for the
regulating and grading of Madisonavc. from Eighty
St to The counsel for plain
M in pressing for the injunction, stated that those inter
estcd willing pay the improvement if benefited
by It, but that Onethrd Of the work from Eghtysixthst
One-hundrcdand ffth-st. had not been done even
contracted for This interruption made the work done
for the present valuecss to the property The
ordinance authorizing the work directed that
ment levied until the whole work done Judge
Lawrence said that this argument seemed suicidal, If
the fact were the would be void in its in
ccption. and an Injunction would not issue to prevent
void act. He, however, reserved his decision. Dcvln
Miller & Tru appeared for plaintiffs; WIN. Barnes for
ms
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13

know she left long before dark or some Ii me before
dark II was daylight when she left.
Mr.. Fuerton-That Is all.
Judge Nelson-ro the wness.l That Is all. ITO coun-
sell That is the both sidcs gentlemen sup
pose.
Mr. shearman-No; we have another witness to answer
some questions here.
Mr Evarts-if your Honor please. shall have scv-
era witnesses We have no expectation OF being able to
finish tonight We have several witnesses, but they
won't be long.
Mr.. shearman-Wc can finish with Mr.. Egglcston in q
few minutes
MI Fuilerton-They say they finish with him ;
perhaps cannot.
journ.
Judge Neiison-tro the jurors.l Gentlemen. get ready
to retire DC In your seats tomorrow morning at IL
o'clock.
The court then adjourned until o'clock this morning
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
MR.. MARTINS TESTIMONY DISPUTED.

BY Mr. Shearman-Mrs. OvingtOn, at what
time in the day did Mr.. Moulton come to your y on
the 2Sth of July A Shortly after O'Clock il ter
noon.
Q, At what time in the day did Gen. Tracy S,ne TO
YOUR house on that day A. AT about ., few mo-
inents before Mr. Martin there.
q. Mr.. Martin testified that he came TO your house
about halfpas. O'Clock In the afternoon and found
Gen. Tracy and Miss Turner seated in the back parlor
now halfpast O'Clock in the afternoon where was
Miss Turner and who with heri A She was in the
back parlor playing on the piano. Mr.. Oyngton, Mrs
Ton and my self were there listening to her. Mr. Mar
tin was not in the house. neither was Gen. Tracy.
q Now will you state for the purpose Of fixing that
time at what hour Miss Turner arrived at your house.
and what she did after that during the afternOoni
Mr. Fuerton-That is objected TO. That is all gone
through with. Your Honor will recolect Miss Turner
was questioned with great particularly in regard TO that
and we have proved nothing 70 the contrary.
Mr. sbearman-It was on Examination and in their
rebuttal that they pfoyed something TO the contrary
Mr. Fuerton-In the redirect, Sir they went into the
subject.
Mr. shearman-That the redirect OF Miss Turner
Mr. FuertOn-They have right To take up that topic
Judge Neison-They have only right to take u UP 10
contradict statements made by the witness
MT Funerton-Yes, Sir and that is what object 10.
mr. shearman-That is what We propose to DO lie
says he met Miss Turner at half past2.
Judge Nelson-Read the particular clause In which
CIR Martin states that and asks her about it,
Mr.. shearinan-At what time did Miss Turner come 10
Sour housei
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
CRIMINAL MOTIFS.

The case of James A. Duffy, accused OF fclon0us
assault battery In trying TO revolver Deputy
Controller Earle Il for trial in the Of
Ser siOns today.
The Nav Term of the United States Circuit Conrf
criminal AIDE Judge Benedict prsng opened eserday
and until saturday b, enough Iurors
present organize the Grand Jury.
In the Court of General Sessions, before. Judge
Sutherland. yesterday stephen Hall Ii years age sent
Prison for three petit larceny from the
Besnger charged with grand larceny was
acquitted itas kron pleaded guNiy iOrlrry In The
fourth degree ,he Prison for years
-. william EDgele peaded guilty OF obtaining goods under
false and sent 10 the Prison
years Joseph COnkling peaded guilty of having burglar
tools his possession, and Ia the Peitsn,Lry
six Charles Brown Charles Fl0ad
guilty each
o. years. Charles Ballard, plraGng gully attempt
grand larceny, sent 20 the state rsOL o
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
MRS. OvNGTON RECALLED.

Mrs. Maria n. Ovington was then recalled on
aehalf of defendant
By Mr. snearman-Mrs. Ovington, are you acquainted
with Mr. Albert Il. Martini A. have been. Sir.
O. You were acquainted with him in the Summer Of
l-74! a. 1 was.
O. He visited frequently at your house after Mrs Tllton
.aIne did ne nOtl A. Very frequently
q DO vou rccolect day when he visited your house
At time when Miss Turner and Gen. Tracy were there
A. Perfectly.
O. Can YOU tell what day that vast A. The 2sth of
July
O. Is74l A. 1874
q Now. can you recolec Mrs. oyington at what time
~ the day Miss Turner first came your house that
dayf
Mr. Fullcrton-That is objected 70, Sir.
Mr. shcarman-we if your Honor pleases, it is merely
question of the order which shall show the impossi
hility of Mr Martins statement
Judge Neilson-You should not comment on the evil
ience.
Mr. shearman-That is what propose to show.
Mr. Fullerton Mr.. Martins statement was in answer
20 your evidence If You had any further or other evil
dence upon that subject it should have been given upon
the direct
Mr.. Shearman-Oh!
Mr. Fuller,on-Wen con-" is not an argument.
IIaughterl Your Honor will perceive that they went
through with that branch OF the case then. We have
produced witness in reply TO that upon that subject
Judge Neson-Now, anything that Mr.. Martin said
that is new, they can meet
Mr.. Fucrton-Undoubtodly, Sir.
Judge NcilsOn-That is all.
Mr. Fullcrton-They cannot at the subject de moro.
MIR shcarman-That is ali that doing, your
Honor.
Mr.. Fullerton-Wcn that IS the reason am objecng.
Mr. shearman-The question is upon some evidence
given by Mr. Martin as the day when he found Miss
Turner there, and Gen. Tracy.
Judge Neison-Take up Mr.. Martins precise state
ment if you want TO call attention 10 it.
Mr.. FullcrtOnThey proved by Miss Turner what time
she went and what time she left there, and they
proved by Mr. Tracy what time he went there and what
time he there and the length OF the interview with
the witness We then, to meet that produced witness
upon behalf to prove the time Now, does not that
end the matter far the time is concerned there
any statement made by witness in regard to the
matter the situation OF thf house anything OF that
kind, they may meet that-that they by this
other witnesses.
Judge Neison-They must state the specific statement
that they wish TO contradict.
Mr.. FuertOn-Yes, Sir.
Judge Neilson-Proceed, Mr.. SheaIman.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13

Mr.. Fullerton-One moment Does your Honor permit
that
Judge NesonI suggested TO the counsel that no read
the particular CLAUSE in Mr. Martins statement upon that
subject, or any other.
Mr. Shearman-I have read the particular clause.
want to show how this lady establishes the time.
Mr. FullertOn-We have not heard the clause.
Judge Nelson-Read the clause In contradiction.
Mr. shearman-I have. your Honor.
Judge NesOn-0O on then.
Mr. Morris-We don't understand the clause
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
LEGAL MEANING OF CERTIFICATION OF A
CHECK.

A suit by the Security Bank of NewYOrk
against tho Bank of the Republic suddenly terminal
ed yesterday in the Court of Common Pleas where it had
been on trial. by the withdrawal Of juror The OF
action arose from the raising" Of check, drawn orig
inaly by H. j. Cippery Co.. in January, 1871 tor $24
on tho Security Bank. The Security Bank subsequently
certified the check after Ii had been frauduently in
creased to Si222 20, and it then presented the
Bank of the Republic and paid After passing through the
Clearing ghose. tho Security Bank paid the money it
to the Bank Of the Republic. and then having
taned tho fraud sued the Bank Of the Republic for the
excess over the original amount Of the check. the
latter bank refusing to make good the amount During
the trial. the question raised the legal nterpre
taiOn Of "cerifcatOn" OF the Chez by the Security
Bank, II being claimed that under decision Of the Court
OF Appeals, the ccrtitcatOn simply TO the
uncness Of the signature and that there money in
the bank to meet the check, and not to the genuinenes OF
the body Of the check An offer was made to introduce
evidence showing the custom prevailing among banks
to the Interpretation given tO the certcatOn Of check
Judge Oew decided 10 admit this evidence, when the
planth raised question OF surprise" ana Withdrew
Juror, the trial being accordingly postponed until next
term
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
TIE INFIRMARY CASE NEARLY COMPLETED.

TIE INFIRMARY CASE NEARLY COMPLETED.
The suit of the boy Doyle against the New
York Eye and Ear Infrmary and DR.. Derby
tinued yesterday before Judge Van Bunt in Supreme
Court, Circuit Dr. Derby himself testified giving
count OF his studies in the branches OF surgical science
practced the Infmary. and OF his treatment Of the
hoy, h nyng emphatically that he could have applied
infected brush to the boys eye. Dr. Hannah. who at
tended the boy when he refused to enter the inirary,
was recalled Tor brief rcbGtta testimony. The
was then summed up to the jury, and the Judge will
cha rye them this morning.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
THE COURTS.
TIE CIVIL SUIT AGAINST TWEED.
VALUABLE PROPERTY RELIEVED FROM The EffEC
og TJyE SHIT

TIE CIVIL SUIT AGAINST TWEED
VALUABLE PROPERTY RELIEVED FROM THE EFFECT
OF THE SUIT.
The application on the part of Henry A.
Cram and Henry Goldsmith, to remove the lis pendes,
in the suit Of the People against Tweed for 6OOOOOO,
from four lots Eighty hirdst. near Nmthave was to
have been heard yesterday before Judge Donohue In S-
prcmo Court. Chambers. Mr. Peckha appearing for the
Attorney General stated that though the facts seemed to
show proper for his consent to such vacatur no
had not had time to examine their truth. Tho matter
was then laid over until Monday.
On the petition Of Benjamin IT, Hutton and Charles G.
Landon, Judge DOnOhue vacated the Tweed lis peJdens
50 lar as concerns property the southeast corner
OF Fiithave and Fortythird-st In their petition tho
petitioners state that their firm, Bernhard Hutton "
Co. had Judgment against Benjamin II. Trask for
S33OOO and began a creditors action to have the prop
erty in question, then standing In Mrs. Tasks nane de-
clarcd to be subject TO their Judgment While that suit
pending Richard NJ. Tweed proposed to them
10 loan him $4,000 on the property They did So
taking back mortgage, and out OF IL they paid
the bulk Of their Judgment They forecl0sed this mort
gage and then. the property being ncumbercd with un
paid taxes and assessments, arranged with Benjamin T.
Fairchld, who by this time had the title 10 take the
property themselves for $4,000, and paid, over and
above their mortgage $4,000 in cash. They claim that
they never know Of any interest OF william NJ Tweed IN
the property and advanced their money under the advice
Oi counsel that the title clear.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
DECISIONS-MAY II.

Supreme Court Chdnbgs-By Judge Lawrence
Buchanan agt StockbrRge.I for granting this
order Beecher agL Bushnell Naiena ae Narna IA the mat
~ Masterson Zweg Magan And Fowler agt Nc
Comack, Hoppin agt Cokzens Heller agt schntacnet IN
the matter OF Gray COnnor Myers In the matter o United
otAtcs Mexican Teiei warner AZ PenLn{ ania
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
CROsS-EXAMINATION OF MRS. OvINGTON.


BY Mr. FullertOn-Was the scandal the sub
ect Of conversation the teatablc that night A ii
was not, Mr.. Fullerton.
@. Not word said about it A. Nothing concern
ing the scandal The arrangement of Bessie being
sent to Mr. that evening the only time the
subject was mentioned.
O. Nothing as to what she was to testify tot A. Not
word.
O. Sure OF itl A. Nothing before she went before the
neither did Mrs. Titon understand that know.
O. How long the interview between Mr.. Tracy and
heri A. Less than hour; can give you the
why know IL was 80.
O. How much less than hour A. Perhaps ten
minutes less.
O. You think. then, 1t about fifty minutes long as
YOU could sayi A. Fifty minutes; could not
say to two three four minutes.
O. As near as you recollectf A. should say it was
fifty minutes.
O. And where did IL take place A. In the back par
lOr The conversation took place In the back parlor
introduced Miss Turner Gen Tracy in the front parlor
O. What took place In the back paiorl A. Miss Turner
wa speaking to Mr. Tracy.
O. II was in the back paIlori A. II In the back
parlor
O. What time did it eommencef A. It commenced di-
rectly after introduced Bessie
o. What time did it eommencei A. A little past five
o,lock; cannot say the number of minutes.
O. What time did Bessie go to the Commiteef A.
Abuu; seven O'Clock, I think It was.
O Did the Committee meet ~ early ~ that A.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13

20l .Big"lOw agt. duncan.
223 Matter of Besan:.
22s. Donovan act. Linney.
23l.Lyon agt Eldrijgs.
3>2 Shea ag,. shea.
3ol..Amrs agL Red'ick.
3u3 Gilman agt Clark.
30 Br"'i agt. Rogers.
3I3. Proliy ant l.. = and
NJ. =. Il. X. 90.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
N BRUNT. J

2909. Parsons and ano. agt
The Mayor. &c.
26Ol. Tracy, adm, &c. agk
The Mayor. &c.
1881. Wood and ano. agt. The
Mayor. &c.
S3l. Emberson agt- Walden.
9S3. Platt, assoc, agt. Van
Nance, imp'd., &c.
12l9...Schifier ct al. agt BruIn-
mer.
13G9a. McGuinness agt. Hst-
aling.
1881. Coal Spring Iron Cs.
sgt. Petite and aDo.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13

GfNRRAL giVNsS, IIlRRlANp. j.. John simpson tharas
sandborn WIZ an Morgan, nuo,hy iinley James itouSt,
tallng, EaNmd Bnrus Patrick Stel burglary; saahus
ker Janes A. Duny onpus assault battery Ralph
O. r. Coles James Poster Charles Iiaritnxton James px
John Smith. grand larceny Jeremiah , itpOsi ~ iIh'm'
Iaughton. forgery; James johnson, ftenencN a. oVohs
| falsc ptctcleva Jacob Ause Assault sou oateAy'
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
rned 70 Nav u. 1877.

j.. BRADY and DANiEis. u.
2l6.. Fraser AFT. Russer snd
Erwin Mig 60. ct al.
2l12. -fcndlctOn agL Muir
ray.
2lS.~ Mo@iy and aDo. agt
Prll.
2l9... Strong. rec'r, aci. N. Y.
j.. Mfg 60. ct al.
ljl Baldwin, aimr, agt
Schmidt.
l55. Browning. Nc. agt
browning impl i.Sa
l9J. Smith agt. Osborn.
20. .Gernlania Bank agt.
Disilcr. imprd.
22l .Hoi'achrr agt O'Brien,
SncTllf, &c.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13
CALENDARS-THIs DAY.



IA. Third Nat. Bank OF san.
dusky agt Ness.li.
con Steel Co.
% .Hoiyoko agt. Murray.
81 Murray agt. IiOlyOke.
II. Bailey agt. SOutier. &c.
lO2. soc. for Ref. Of j. u.
agt. Prcquen7rr.
1l5. Erie Railway Co. agt
Gould.
1873. .O'Connor agt. Collins.
SPECIAL TERN. N.-Adjol
GENERAL TRRA-DAvIs. p.
40. Brown agt. Geary and
anO. ey rs. imprd. &c.
l96. Bronson agt. Dimock.
Zl0. .G0psill agt. Decker and
anO.
80. The People ex re-. Stout.
rec'r, agt. Chapman.
l64 .COgan agt. The Mayor.
DC.
1G5. - agt. -.
2O2... Mills sgt Hilbrett and
aIO.
213. Maryin agt. Prentice
ct nj.
ola. walsh agt. Nehrhach.
2l4l2. Hart agt. Taylor ei al.
2l5...Casscrly. rec'r, &C., AIT.
.NarlaCansett =. SEQ.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-13

piazza its condition in regard 10 neat wlch no Witness
has testified about at all 1t opens the whole subject
Mr. Evarts-Mr. Martin is testifying. He the first
witness that said anything about 1t; and, If remember
night he says that Mrs. TlOn and he up stairs
Judge ,;eson-And he went down stairs. 1t was
Mr. Shearmans examination
Mr.. Evarts-Mr Martins examination as a witness
Judge NeilsOn-Mr. Shearman's examination OF Mr..
Martin.
Mr.. Evarts-we have a right to crossexamine the wit
ness 10 contradict him.
Judge Neilson-YOu cannot contradict man IL that
man does not say thing is not
Mr. Eyarts-He does say that he and Mrs. Tlton went
down the piazza was cooler, and that the
sun as kept from coming IN there and brong them by
a projecting wall that protected, which shaded them
Now, propose to contradict him. We have right to
do
he said you contradict but not an independent
fact
BY Mr.. shearnan-This que ion is asked Mr. Martin
and he gives this answer:
@ Well. it cooler on The piazza when yon went M
down than up IN the room a les VIC "en' oo"" io
that purpose ,.o s,n s,,n,,,, W, q, ,bo
q. Well, was the sun shlningf A. No' Oh inc
And he gives this time as hafpast two o'clock in the
| afternoon, three.
Judge Neson-Yes, ana look liitle further and you
Win ind specific question Of your own on hii POINT
| Mr. shearman-Then he is asked:
Don't you know that from Dig or 3oc"ck IN ne aiicr
noon that the is blazing on that p.@L ad II Is ih
hottest place iii the houset A don't INN" 49, SIR
O. Don't yon know that that piazza s exposed To the
afternoon, and that that 1t Is the time tne s is
shining on III A. think know IL Is Out 'hcie Is po-
| lection there from the sum-
Then he goes on say there s some protection from
the building the next house. think the next house Is
a protection" Further he says This house next
door ia three story brick house. and running back, and
the other house does not and he that he has re-