The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-07-21
THE COURTS.
The Tweed Bill Of Particulars Entry
Of The Order in The Case.
PROCEEDINGS IN THE OTHER COURTS.

the case OF Ignatz Herzog, arrested on COM
plant OF Myer stern, eX-Commissloner Of Cnari-
ties and Correction, Tor alleged false pretences
IN the purchase OF some iurs, application was
made yesterday by Mr. william F. Howe 10 Judge
westbrook, holding Supreme Court. Chambers
for wris OF ha0eas corpus ana certlorarL
It was claimed tnat the alleged onence
was committed, II at all, in 1869, and
thus barred by the statute OF limitations. ana
further that the re ator was committed without
reasonable or probable cause. Judge Westbrook
granted the writs, making them returnable to-
morrow.
The following named property was condemned
m she United states District Court by default, no
claimants appearing, viz. :-One hundred reels,
containing g. 74O bundles OF cigarettes, seized on
1he City OF Mexico; SIX rubber bags, containing
1850 cigars; s97 reels containing 1890 bundles OF
cigarettes seized on the steamer Vera cruz.
Patrick Trainer who carries on the business or
q tobacco manufacturer at No. 3l4 East Thirty
sixth street, was charged before Commissioner
Shielos with having failed 70 pay the SPECIAL tax
provided by law. he was held TO answer IN $500
bail.
TWFED'S BILL OF PARTICULARS.
Pursuant 20 the decision recently given by
Judge Donohue at Supreme Court, Chambers,
Declaring that william N. Tweed, IN the SUIT
brought against him 10 recover S6OOoOOO, Is en-
titled 20 bill OF particulars setting forth the
exact nature Of all the warrants upon which the
money was drawn and which were forged false,
fraudulent, or ictitious, and order was entered
yesterday The following is the order:-
AT special term OF the Supreme Court or the
State OF New YORK, held at the Court House, in
city OF New York on the Goth day Of July, 1875
Present, Hon. Charles Donohue, Justice.
The People OF the state OF New York vs.. William
A. Tweed and another.
The defendant Tweed, having moved to have
the complaint made more definite and certain,
and to have a bill OF particulars furnished and !
for other relief as more fully appears by the sew
eral orders 10 show cause whereon such motions /
were made, and Mr.. Field having been heard for I
she motions and Mr.. Pecknam ia opposition /
thereto, now upon reading and fling the sum-
mons ana complaint herein the order 10 show |
cause, dated May J. 1875 and the af1davit OF
Robert z. Deyo and the three notices thereto at
tached; the order to show cause, dated May 4, |
1875. and the afidavt OF Robert L. Deyo thereto I
attached. the order to show cause. dated May s,
1875. and the affidavit of Dudley Field thereto at
iached, and the order to show cause, dated May
II, 1875, and the aldavt OF Dudley Field, read on
the part OF the defendant and the affdavits or
Stephen c. Lynes, Arthur E. Smith, George w.
Smith, Henry I. Taintor, Eugene f. Barrows,
James Il. Ingersoll. Andrew J. Carney, John II.
Keyser, John Mob. Davidson and Artemus Cody,
read on the part Of tne plaintiffs.
IL is ordered FIRST that the paintn serve upon i
the attorney for the dele4 dant Tweed, within ,
twenty Gays from the entry OF this order notice I
tnereof an amended complaint, wherein, /
J. They should specify what right or interest N /
the premises the May r, Aldermen ard Common {
Atty set up or pretend TO. 2 they snail either
strike out 80 much OF the complaint as sets 10 Tn
the alleged neglect TO auIit the claims against the
city, and especially the portion thereof beginning
with the words "that the said pre- ended claims
or liabilities were not,n at the middle OF folio
j, down TO and including the words "signed
the samen in the fourteenth folio, shan
state ia the COMPLAINT that they DO not rely
upon toe neglect TO audit as a cause for action or
II they elect to sue Tor the alleged neglect, they
snail strike out so much OF the COMPLAINT as SETS
forth any fraud, conspiracy or combination on the
part OF the said Tweed aud watson.
SecOnd-That the plaintn serve upon the at
1ornles for the painIh Tweed WITHIN twenty /
Gays from the entry OF this order DOtice thereof
n bill Of particulars OF tue pldlnilns claim, setting
forth In lull and In detall:-L The whole or sucn /.
parts OF and items IN each or the bills, accounts,
vouchers warrants mentioned IN toe COM /
plant as they CLAIM 10 have be n false. 2 The /
whole or such parts OF items as they claim 10 nave
been nctit0us; ana, ., the Wnoe or sucn /
parts or items as they claim to nave been fraudu-
lent and setting forth in each case the parts por-
fions or Items oil sucR bills, accounts vouchers or
Ffals or labor not furnished 70 tue palnlins CIV
ing the description, date and amount thereof and
Bucn parts, portions or items as they claim to have
been oYercharged, or In any other respec IA Sc or
erroneous, stating the amounts and descriptions
OF the supplies, materials and labor actually
charged and the prices at which they were
charged and also setting forth the prices at which
&c Is claimed they shoHld have been charged.
ThfTd-That 20 much OF said motions as are not
ordered that the time for the defendant Tweed to
answer, demur, or take any other action 70 Whlch
ne may be entitled Is extended until the expira-
sion or twenty days, alter such amended COM
plant and sucn bill OF particulars shall have been
served upon hls attorney.