New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-07-05

that Vcnrv Ward Beecher had ever said to MIRA Mcuor
lake his life How he rccorccd it with his high esteem
Ter Mira NoulJon as witness ne cnnid not sy ie isoe
cved that roni The question was put toh'mtha
TAI hccu alTcNiy nut to jurynan. how 1t happened
thatif Mrs Monitors testimony was so wen tcflNeo
generally by The Jury. Che majority east Nnels 'bao.s
etcadiy for Nr Bcech,rl Vas not this equivalent to
charge Ol PERJURY ac lins Mrs MuHtopt Nh Carpenter
~ nv and ms Trs va fhat 70 hreve Mr. BeecSer was
necessarily 20 ets,np MIR. Monitor as pernrr
wss the old story over aud over as''m Siio NJ. Nai-
pe9teT sac crSdoiity oi vinessss The ques:.an was
tcni do not say that Mrs. Monitor u c,a S,osy ~
Ing untrnth, bar choose to Believe Mr.. bceeher IN
re sa,ne feeling prevailed Gu al DISPUTED questions
fir ieccl'r's word taken assiS th4i o. cach CA
6yIue zach other Mrs. Mouon Wa his strongest opp9-
ncu;. Too wors Of ioaion ,ii@n hate SAity' J3sgpo
wl,s Opposed 90 his. Mr.. non's testimony according
Mr. Carpenter, went for very ittle Wlth tne
he had Openly confessed 10 having led AND that avowa
weakened considerably what might otherwise have
ov,aenly fsii that Moulson bad fold the truth when he
aaid bc lying, and tat he vas lying when he swore
that lie was telling truth. Mrs rton not much
res ,rded by either side. inasm; - she was no; Wit
o,ss Teoy dsrcsar~t TO- t9 v%roHS s,a'enea'~
gwen in as Tie n;n evidence on wh'eh they were
TIC Letter of Confession 10y Mrs. Ifion was oonid
erVi A. charge simply % hnll orcr solicitations, ana u
was ne1tisiisd ~ whatever thec' II nhfht nave a ~
a. il. ql,cnt denial aud retral AOn. The IeGcr ~
Ccuri'i0Il." dictated hy 4lr BecChcr to Mr.. Hulton
yc,s ca,ofnny cnsid1,d ana al his othor letters taken
t snnsetloa win it, No of thnl the jury observed
oOn,aiuo mention II adultery Trey expressed sor-
ipv r IN great affection which Lad been brought upon
T'ions household Nj Carpenter accented Mr.
I,e.eheI = paHotOn to this chec: as satisfactory,
ana the m2joliy Of the jury agreed with him
VI insist d on ~ any one during he debera
OF the jury thIt hc chulse against ar Bcecher one
OF iHprOpor sOiciiai ion, rue. " Our argument Wa
said ir Csrpcut.f, - hd ia yOu believe Dir. Becchers
yrod & all Won mast believe that charge 10 be cqDiiy
uu M with the other lie has dced ihat DO over mate
;,y such proposals 10 Ms TitOn and II N spite OF :
word 10 tAe contrary You believe t.t hc ca make aAch
proposals., you may equally believe the charge OF
edult-ry."
ihc opinions OF tie jury radne VT. lmcys acton IN
The case divided som fhOGEnt tbt hc ouSh not
e. undertaken Tie after MS conference with the
.lcr aide Others Thought Mat judges charge dis
tgos1 Of that question. Mr. tuilorcu very loiutI
wish Che jury. NJ Eva.tas s}ecc bore OF tne palm IN
ha general opinion Judge PcrfeI's hId elet effect on
tho uTy, snG nheyed T. have won two votes - inc
tSac the defendant. III. Beech sccg was also very
qrrii admired Tie admiration icrJude tIsoh through
Cns the who'll, css, uus0unagd Mr.. B9Tcp's tclt-
ulOly WAS alike icGuUcd by either side as aHecuug
lno lnin issue. Bo e Turner Was pretty IayoiaJ re-
Gel I'd.
Hr. Carpenter. prevsIs to the trol had served 81
times foreman uficS IL sad thai boiing would
lnlcc ban u sc.Ne again o. INC Becohei case SHOULD II
L. c,rnff II !lr most trynS p"silinn hefGd "Yt
oo,ilScd in hs ne. His age eNcmpte him from ilri'
nfy service ana Lac meaa 70 take advantage 81 MS l'-