, 1875-07-08
THE PENDING INJUNCTION,
MIR. Fuller Closes Ills Argument
for the Orators.
A Decision to Bo Given This Morning

"a bet4al9A " G0 tlFE1 4uA morning
| -.
Tho hearing of tho arguments in the po,ics
Doard Injunction case Wan rcaurncd hesorc .7rdcr
Farxol 1cutcrdav ,,,,rn,no iii, ..,a,. H..
~" ,,'se'u"9 ''oE"''R' "t''o moro inter
ehs "aa snkeh IN tho proceedings than on the
Previous day. Tho court-roon, waa comfortably
filled, tho Aldermen aud othor city oi1}cn1s mt
ting In an appearance II, te ,h,+ ~,
dn.;.,,,, ,uo,i, ~ $1,000 1.FosAA .AA' - .se
aec's'on "ona Do reached. Every ono "as din.
| appointed "hcn tho Judge announced he would
| docido tho case th!a morning. This Aldermen
| are growing thin aut] cnrnuotn undcr tha u,..
pe,,rc, aud tho Nayor odmIts lawn. ,"r,
IN ,,n,,,,s. sua;s,,,,. n .' "A- 'oA'
~ p'u"''o ""l'"H 1no l'as1 10" aa;a'
AZ tae opontne Of tho Couft
Mn. aounr
nado An additional suggestion which 1,o omtt.d
Mr. Pnicr III hi. onenitIr thnt NM of In eo,n,
rinluan,s {Shondnu) WA eiectcd n~;or ~ III
ndoption Of tho Constitution Of 1a7) and I'm.
Soo. 6 Of the schedule continued IN otllco nil
porsouh who held tloir commissions nr;nr tn ti,n
oDtiou Of tho Consk;tnto Ssn,,rsa, f,r " ,,,. NV
| plninauts lid mol mnEo nart,c,,lnr ,,sa ~ ~ H.
proposition, but scanned to ntnant IL M onn rcn
son why lilo ordinance was Invalid. liz wjsl,au
tho Constitution did nrotort Hi,or,lsn Mnt,1 tho
term for which ho WA cIacte,t aIrirnl Wthot n
would rroYont tho Legislature or I'm f1on,m,n
Council under tic Loylsjnturo fron, romnrtu.
A{l-f0t II Ml4 not nfNyCtl& tin IariHntnrN frnr
changing h,s dutioa or taking awny frnn him snv
powcr l,n nousossci when in Conatitmtinn was
ndoptotl II Alr. Fuljor intended To nrcaont In
nrnnnstttor 10 an .rw,,,na,t .sn;,st tx ftsa. a."
nf tho orillnance. tno reason wns mt emnni
While 8lettdan vaB undo,ttitct1,v entitled In In
Commissioner Of Police until mkt fail I'm or.
uinancp waa noycrthetosn valid
Judge Dickoy submitted another authority nm
inincton. Ink nun ,xarrentn ns IL ta,n ,ut III
rciuody. ~ a"' ""'A"A'0 "A' wv p'ope5
I'm. tu,1ru
lilo nrgun,pnta submitted by in fc.r,aa fronds
counsel Tor tho dcfondnlita-,o whirb IN hi
lietouod with unusual iutorcnt from a cnriosis,.
to discover On what possIbia oronntIa ti,cv rnst.
n1oposition Tint tho board af rnitcn VIM "a.
pea}cd out of oxistenco. .-coneodc,i soyarn1 noai.
lions which ho tool, ana II wonl1l In ncacssnrr ,
for lin 10 ropeat tLem' Analsze3 iosIr5 tiav can,o
dawn to tI,fx !: Tint tha aionsiHr ~ t,.a 80 % ~
1879 If u1o,,te unaratofl tn ranont mi ~ a1;at.
once all prior charter onactuaonta rcrta;ntuo IL
thc city, IIo foit there was no m,5lo f.rn,,,I -
mud that It would not bo contenIcd t|Iat Tia
Common Council Of tn!a Or sny ~ other ' city itS
could hare tho nower lelcratad II n ~ ronnss,
atatutcs. Either thnro was tots1 rcncoi ~
iii prior cnactmants, or tho Board Of pofico uoa
still in existence, aud dofendants had faiiod to to
ishod by tho act OF 1s72. VIII the conaoonenoea u
tho Cour. had mailing to tio nm exnn ,i'n"i
ali thu icn;,at,o ora,pfor ~" tonnad d'u
for tho oitY waa ohliterntntl. If liz law wns ~
rr+tan tho Cnnrt ,xonls h. ~ ~ cI sas, -" maa ~
but oN' "0N'A -A' " 'Ao Aes''' ''Ns's'
turned on tLo t,osition-.amd conid nnly hc .ue.
tainod on tlo position--that tho net Of 1B7a Taa
s.Iutitutn, FOR al prior cnattor ouacsn,vnss. IL.
oounsei conducted ten int aeanst 81 se c"n.
str,iction Sec. intcrpoaed ' itsoiS. an'f
said thas ali lnxs or ,i parta A's't ~
laws wiich arn not innouuiasent viii,
t1s tax el,alj continue il, forcn'1 Whit ,oa tLo
uuo Of arguing In tilo face fr s,ch n nrov.;on
TLo only nncsinn. thersfora si,,ci, rn,n.i,.'I
an which, indeed, wns tlae ou,y ono In tho aasn-
wnn whether n mi lin od in ~ T. rn,t;a,
osr Of pole xcr ncunsistont wit H. ~ ~, ''as ~
ls79 And not siply iucousstont. thay NV w; ,n,,st IT.
In er ronurnant taf liza tro ro"l, ~ sHa'
Mr., Fuller at greht onrt,, wont inn thta o,,ns.
tio,,. comparing tho oid and now charter a auu
e'ain''ns tSs' q a5ss,; tts,s S,s ,xroxs,srrx,x ~
Tic hotd tInt tin nct NJ ts71' ic;rn , ,,,,,,1
law, was only applicable to citins uowly ar.au,
ized, or c,tps not poaaossuE those oIli;ots' If
oe sa s ys tafen sFo soa a b.
aootton or provision OF tho net wIjoh nncratcI
~ o repeal Of lis lawu croatinu ti,o 1,aar5 81
Toitco. If t,ore wns s,,ch n soctnn ~ nrnn,.,o,,
i eou!d anly 90 ropua! pge :sato lus tIera @ was
viii, tl.o rroyisjous Of tho acts relating to tn
jIoarl, T,on tLo crliuancn nsssci hy 9hc cotn.
1nou uounuii was absolutely u tl. ioosh Of lin
etatuto Inv Of tho Etatu The onIv nnint ,yI,irI,
was ioft waa way ''|'|' "At-a
WHETHER An 1s1uscr1ox w4s IN 4rrnorn,.r,
nrMs1,y. 'NA@
lilo VIVA refras},ol witn tj,a aweot ntctu,, Ar
GouT ray NJ 10 lilo harmnSy WIFI ,,;',I, , n
eno lin fGtv SIor,b"i III ton',
nprolntcl md no dIsnuto '' Ind ars,n v''
1Iit III ta nnnnint, ,rant ,a AIt A'!su.l'
i,,cre Vac M knovIns wat nisht
i,ayn aucnri rvnrs snvm ,oro ,s;von NM AiSt tSat
oiIoor With intnrforc, n tl,e y, a,nto.t ,,otn,is
wtl, tac utos iInnosotl unon his cjiNuss ,,v ia~
cn,iir,nn wae innvt,oh.c md d.,,o"ro,,2 ne','
sa, mt 6ni.oto ,nemont i; 1r nro,,,1, III .,.a
writ :" '1'~'~"' - h'A"''"' a'o
j,.doo nick.v,-uo VIM Ian. .,,t ,,,,,, A..
al ~ 1a7% ~ Corno u ~, ao,s suns nnt ~, ean
pointmet,t Of q civ Ma,si'ai F'''"' ''A ''' ~
Air FuJfcr-T ,Iot,tt fI,i,,ir +hov o,.;t.
they cannot throuah this orIiuanco.' "'o nat