The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-07-08
DECISIONS.
OOUkT--OHAMBKHl
BY Iudpe Lawrence.

BY Judge Lawrence.
Harden We Corbett: HARRISON vs.. van Valken-
burph; Bayles Vs. KiersLed; Lyon vs. EldreGge;
Dodge VS.. Hazlett; BALDWIN vs.. Ursnsnaw-orders
as settled.
The People VS.. STANDARD Union Manufacturing
Company,-n this case an order should ne entered
that inteIroga ores to the par ties alleged TO have
ed the Injunction order be fled, and direct
ing o reference TO MIR. Joseph Bosworth, to take
the answers of said parties TO the lnterrogatores
and suUh proofs As may be offered ana 10 report
the same to the court.
this action the Marine Court mad jurisdiction OF
this class of actions. The removal was py consent
ana | see no reason, therefore, Tor granting the
motion. Motlon denied with costs.
barry vs. Klen.-Motlon for reasons stated IN
the memorandum ia Klein VS.. Barry.
WeetJen VS.. ST. Paul aud Pacinc Railroad Com
pany.-The General Term having re used 10 dis
tuI6 the prnSps o. ,p tse Suafc' ion
action in max ng an order increasing the amount
OF security. Motion denied wltaout COSTS
Farnham vs.. Nor; Jefferson VS.. Grot; Sttbbins
VS. Madan ct al; Barowsky VS.; Wlnans; PAIL
,cerek vs. Gler; Somborn vs.. RaUensLeln; Pat
.fersOn vs. ACCOMMODATIONS granted.
Farnnam VS.. Moir-Motlon granted and allow
hnCe OF five per cent AWARDED
Phelps Jr., VS.. Wltbeck.-Motion granted on
payme mt OF costs beore notice OF trial and $40
and all proceedings hereunder TO stand as
curly. ~-.S n.o,s. nor-.os o.,
pany-Motion denIeo, with $40 costs, 30 abide the
Wheelwright VS.. Mites.-Motion granted, refer.
Soutnworth vs.. westbrook.-Motion granted
and reference ordered 10 Mr.. Frank Rudd 10 hear
Morrey VS.. Borger-Motion granted upon pay
meut WITHIN ve Gays OF all the costs OF the action
80 date aud $40 costs OF opposing the melton.
Alterberg vs.. Stevens.-keport confirmed and
OrGer granted.
Licnt VIZ. ROgge.-Motion granted and reference
granted to MI. John N. Lewis.
Panama Railroad Company VS. Robinson. =
commission and to dismiss action denied. No
COSTS.
Noonan VS.. swift see no way to avoid q ref
eTence. Swift Is entitled to some com pensaton
Tor the collection from Dumply, aud the value Of
his services can Gully be ltqudated by reference.
Let 1t De referred 10 Mr.. Frank kudd 10 take proof
Rowe VS.. Standardization granted without
costs to either party Order TO be entered &C.
Mul,any va. Freeman.-The refel ee's report Is
required Tor examination before IL can be con-
Hines vs. House.-The Court should appoint
the referee. Let such an order be prepared.
Peckham va Clark.--AotIon grained. Reference
Bsch vs.. Hanck, Jones W.. Russell Green vs.
Contradictions granted, with $40 costs.
faeisn vs. Coliender-Motlon denled' Win $40
UDman vs.. Haas.-Extra allowance OF $3.50
In the matter of the arbitration between Louis
Napoleon Larvcheter VS.. H. LarvcDeter.-Award
- confirmed and Judgmen ordered.
Guerra va. Guerra.-Report Of referee confirmed
and Judgment OF divorce grained 10 plaIntIn.
mutual Lille insurance company vs. GencrOss.-
The testimony taken and the proceedings before
the re,eree must De annexed TO his report before
any action can be taken looking to con1rma-
lion.
Panama Railroad Company vs. Robinson what.
ever may be the PM aseooRy OF the complaint, the
action Is substantially for money In the
Defendants hand5 belonging to the plant n,
for which he has failed but is bound
10 account This 10 not altered by his hav-
ing converted such moneys TO his own USE The
Gist OF tile action, IN legal point OF view, is the
examination OF a long account, IS involved, and
that the action should be referred. Motion
granted, ana reierred 10 AIR. Frank Ruud.
stern Va. Stern-Report confirmed and judg
ment OF divorce granted.
SUPERIOR CoURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
By Judge Sper.
The National Trust Company or the City Of New
YORK Vs. Roberts ell al.--MOliOn OF defendants de-
MED with $40 costs; order to be entered on
notice In meantime let the pr ocecdlnRs be stayed
bn the part OF the pidintIn until the order Is set
yed and entered.
heillck, Jr., ct al vs. Wood. Jr.-Reference or.
meTed; order TO be settled on notice.
Wuaprett VS.. Wldprett.-Refereeis reporr con-
6rmed and judgment ordered Tor the plaintiff, ac-
fordinR to The prayer OF the complaint.
Canaghan VS.. Callaghan.-MotiOn granted. II
ine delenuant wishes u reduction OF alfmony, a
motion should be made BY MIN for that purpose
punded upon iurtner evidence Of the want OF
Jb.lty to pay.
Van zile vs.. Van Zile.-Judgment ordered for
plaintiff.
HeIzDerg ct al. vs.. Murray.-The motion to set
tslde and vacate the Judgment enterec in this
kase must be denied, with $40 costs. The order
20 DC entered herein must reclte all the papers
hSed on the motlon.
COMMON PLEAs--spRCIAL TERM,
BY Judge Latremore
Orawlord vs.; MISUNDERSTANDING ai1davit,
Which 10 undenied, SHOWS that tnis Is a reIeTable
Ease,
zones Va, Jones.-Applieatlon granted.