The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1875-11-18
AEGAEA
Lsaal Notice.
Court Of Common Pleas Or STARK county, oALo.
The Trustees Of Canton lOwpshipl ciyll Action,

Court Of Common Pleas Of STARK county, ohIo.
The At Trustees Of Canton 'OwnsAip( ctyll Action,
James A. saItOn ct al. Notice.
The defendant, James A! saxeon, adhiInlb,salor
Of the estate, with the will annexed, OF Thomas
Hartford, deceased, also In bis Individual capNei-
ty, The unknown heirn Of said Thomas Hartford
aud the Orphans Asylum Of Allegheny county
Penns RaniN; are hereby notified that the plain.
tifis, Trustees OF Canton township. Stark county
aforesaid. OH the g3d day ol October 1879, fled 4
petition In the Court Of Common Pleas Or HRid
county of Stark, setting iorth among other thinRs
tha! s9meLlme In the mouth Of .sePtembeTI lepi,
said Thomas Hartford died In the city of Pitts.
burgh, Allegheny county Pennsylvania; leaving
no issue. but leaving one Abigail Hartford. who
is since deceased, AZ his widow That At the time
OF his death said Thomas Hartford was, and Ioy
many years Heretofore had been owner In fec
simple OF the following descrped real estate Sbtu
ATE In the county Of Stark, ohio, t0.wit;
l. A tract containing. one hundred and thirty
six and 1b1loO actest more or lesS being pan Of
the north east quarter Dissection ten, townGhlb ten
range eight, which was conveyed 20 him by one
John Sloane by deed bearing date on the 4th day
OF November 1879, recorded In book II" pages
BOB and 3Ol, OF the records In the Recorders once
OF said county Of stark
2i Town lots number sixty three, one hundred
and seventy. eight, one hundred seventy nine and
one hundred and eighty, III the town, now city of
town. and NV VI ~ ~ m 'o''T-' F'r'1r' -
S,Atown lot In the town Of Bethlehem, now
Navarro in tald stark county, which is known
aid designated on the original plat of SAID IDWh
of Bethlehem as the pStone quarry lotD
That, by his last viii and testament said Ihota.
as Hartford willed and provided thattduriuR IN
liftime OF said widow, his executors should rent
and lease all the aforesaid real estate together
with all his real estate In Pennsylvania 10 me
best advantage; and out OF the rents isSues and
profits OF the same pay his said widow annually
daring her life, the sum OF 1--WE hundred dollaSs
IN quarterly or half YEARLY Daymenis. aild thai
the residue of said rent issues and proAts theS
shI uld apply, AFTER flrst deductlle necettarv III
penses and compensation for services, by puttilg
the same on interest to be used for improving sAd
real estate either by building thereon or by fs-
pai ling the buildings then already thereon or
Afterwards nut thereon. H'7' -
That by n Codi II 10 his Aaid will said TbnY.aa
Hartford willed and devised all his aforesaid real
estate in said county of Stark, and all the isslea
and ayails arising cut of the zane 10 The nooS ~
the town Of Canton, ," being the town. now cav
of Canton aforesaid, 10 be applied. used and an.
loved "in the ,gay most likely 10 do good - -
That under the laws of the state Of Obio tbe
title TO wit said real estate by virtue Ofthe aiore
Eaid devise IL vested IN the Tristeas Of Raid TS,n
ton township, plaintiffs In trust for the nno1 m
said town. now city of Canton. and sad trnstaes
are also entitled to'haye and receive IN truSt a.
said poor lhe ayalls rents. Issues and mr. ,fts of
Inc same which have accrued since tbe ,eath ~
said rhomas Hnrtthrd and not used ara an.JisS
as authorized by said viii. -rp''"~
. That "a the 13th dav ~ .June 1874 said Nido,-
Hartford by n proper instrument IN writing rsin
ouished tuTrendered ana reiealed In 7svoT Of
said Door ofthe town now city of Canton AID "a
girt In them ali her right n the rents i.S,,ss
ana nrii6ts ~ the sforssaid real eSta,s IN "sd
start county benO nor life inIarest therein hS
means whereof The p'aintifIN an ths tTnutesa -
said Canton township became aud were isWiuliy
omitted 20 said rents issues and profits In trnst
forthe moor faad town now citv N III nm, : ~
That more than two wears before he cor, ,meDoe.
rnent NJ this anil said 'Widnw Harttnrd IansrtoS
this life but that although one clause ofthe viii
Of said Thomas Hartford has aiso nnoyided thai
bis ayscntnrs sbnnIS uith;n ,,yn aasry ~. ~
death of his said wife sall ali hs r"al uS,sta NJ
steps whatsoever have been taken toteii Inc ,ea1
estate 30 situate In said countv ar StaTk .thatIn
fact said clause IN said viii was susnended nv the
aforesaid provision In said todicil =
THAT shortiv efthr the death NJ saId 1u,ov.a.
Hartford said lanes A Saxton toiL the ,,os.aS-!
ion and control of said real estate In sei S1SsS
cnuntv and received the rent ;sS,I.s and nrnst.
thereof in trnst and 10 he a6nlied az nrovidsS ss
aforesaid That, afterwards, on the Ist day of Web
ruary 1y56 he was anDointed hv lhe pronste CnHS.
ofsaid county of fStark adminiStratorof Inc pS,Ste
with the will annpxed of said 'rhontsa uartIr,f
deceaIed aa ancilary inisra m of en- ID sstata
in the State of Ohio That since he was In noSsas,
ihI and had the rontroi Of raId resI ast ~ M ~
COW large sns for he rents tsssS e1d ,a,.
thereof: t6ath he felled sold and nfherVise ann,c.
nriated large ouanitv of vainahla timheS "pp ~
tract rst described thst he rsceved If tho pan my
syIvsnia and Ohio RsIlroad Cnmnsny' N. ~
I'M of pav over said tract Ia re nm ~ ,na
ard that he sill has in his hands Iaras snSrSSyt
nancy srisin0 from aaid avaIis TanE oiseras avS
nroHts fnr wbicH III "a Maid FL accb,irt u 1hS4
psinfiaS In tr,,st for ssid noor ''yDs,H iiV
Thai thonSh often renuasted ha bos noola,.oa
IN acconn tS tha nanttf "a The 'sS'SH ~ ~,
him received and in His hands. And SIiII
fniIv retains said monevs - |''Y "Fi'Orrs,
6st the nlsintiffs ALA of,en demanded ofA,,.
ne nossesipn of the afEressid resI artsta ~ saN
VIZ .o iYat eotStc ~ otstu