, 1875-05-06

uk bAV G'sy ~ tnF9 bE1Blu8Ily W6f04 VI c0uIaV
tho Aldermen wsro restrained from any now sct
OF legislation under thla lau-from doing !
anything to recoguizn tho act Of 1879. |
Tho original hit sought to declare 1t
that tlls CITY Of Chrago III It's Departments might ls
IL. & s2 a .ch in sHs nsi5 a
CHATTER. II did nos altsu1t to biul Up tia city;
GOVERNMENT WOULD srILl4 III LIFT,
which could havn been s1ertl.ed under tha old ons
Tho administration Of city aars would not 10 Inter
poiat that DO IT, ad lad asssated % /, ths Iss
lat,ra ministerial power 70 canvass TIC vote that
or Se hts ni'f sia,ssS @ . e N: a
t,tiety to the Common Council. In aurjnst |
4 s H. fa s .t ssv, :a sa:s q T. %
llaa simply nsin!.frtal ,nsy 10 perform.
vi H further s H. sseGn m n ~ nd
st4.ute l.sd net been comrei viii lii rasl,oet il
esat ., nne ,..sa, md hss !. VI. 20 xre..y out
Tbs Aldermen had appontod them. sud nudsr tas |
e G e. ~ ="
and II VA. ey!acnt that, at the na,c thcJ appon.od
thcse n1e who grossly conducted themselves, they
1STEHpAp 70 pEnrETlNTE P,.Aup
shcit adyi'ers could, when called upon by tbs Court
s,sunei 10 the Court, and 10 dscils ihs case Ths
Go,'neii hid no right to c.nys she vote. having TO
mens Of tlls statute must bo adhered to Otherwise
Ia then touched upon The question Of authority
snrr;orsios ~ prosetns' ,avs7tins to ths I'M Of
.nste w ne, No .1e,a.ts q rsmsa! ,.ys ty II.
WA. any adequate remedy By Law, and would IL glad II
tho gentlemen on the other slds w!,u!A point ou:
statutory lrayi4od under wc. tha .'ee.En could ba
contested. quo warfAnto was nat sufficient ronn-
eay, II l, wcEa claimed s.sro ay rsnsdy untlur H.
Ooaa.ei on tho o.hct sido bad given sheir opinion;
10 aa . sa Il IL pas reasons
Tho Court then took recess for half au hour.
Upon reaAasnblin4,
opened for the defendants. Hc s4id bcfore proceeding
10 dsauss ths Law. he tltared TO nlaks
and Lila Assoeiata-not specifically but tho moaning
verY pap.bs. lie teagtd to ssy that he had no
tss is xs.{ II h. s as:s:
Chicago who VA opo;ed 70 the adoption Of The ae Of
s !. "a o' :: &c !: %
elstDn. Indirectly, aud outside u thu record rsaeo
o. had efn Gust spoa lin ,n NJ. tsosafs !; for
based vera rpecaes,ly submitted to tasa BY the city
officers, 1pa 1t tstahie Al much
HIS IMPERATIVE DUTY
to gi7s lts s!ncts: opinion Of tue 4w in writing - II
mil ,n II ande1 S luz psna. IN ea.o 10 ders
Il. lie bad no tno!tvs s1e"rt to do lts duty. l! lad
! gard tho njnncoa, Tb1t matter not bef0re tbs
ceeliugs that question all he felt that Is no.
counsel Upon shs matter or thrir ronduet thoIl 10
called ln gucsnon an. discussed row. lie had Mlupy
III dis1anes @ ' Of onion ] A aaons i'll i'll ras as"e.stss
On unt tub!oct-sous thought ono cuufse was wise anu
sono .nushcr and ID IrUp.r forum. il she qustion
cal,Ie up lie was ready 10 lar wat his a1yiue wa
Butce it to NV that tic assertion was Gratutng and
rrs,, out al utarnrchsustou Ar.in. be- deaired to
s.y that
| nEronr THE cnnprn ronuM
h, cn,, M; nnJrrt,rn H. tlpaT nm o,strc4to, IN N.
way of any iox.I and lesliisat. procesdnu sor ihs
h.yt occtr y, ax w seisoa ns asthtr la hc 81
IL. s.sucssss desire to cover up wicien..s or 10 pro-
wh.tl.st i'm partss eon,nainant had come hafore !
! forum which by inE II pruyjIcti for ths iuyasti.
t,atan ar suct, on.,tiansE That ia dnni.J. md
sisn tpt tere wa snyshhG In te rsrnsd in iii.
which would make Il propcr an rglt for lii. iionor
| r. liam m iniunrtinn ncnftents ntt such ~ wus
| saksI for '
WHAT WAS IT PROPOSED To rs,o1S7
r,,. ,Ta.in, - ~ 80 - noe, ~. ,nt ~ -,,.
a. a,n,'.t ~" ,,i :. 1G. H. H. H. us ~ ~ ~ aonnt
Hsrs ,n contr: ,rn ,n,i,;nn ~ g1.an ~ 1oi.t ~
M n