davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
ARGUMENT OF Mr.. BEACH.

Mr. Beach-If the gentleman will have the
authority in Court here that will show OF course very
clear; we cannot tell from marginal notes But your
Honor has struck the point Sir. ~ what IA material In
this evidence suppose It will be pretty clearly emem-
bered by your Honor Mr. Tracy in his examination
in-chirf substantially declared that he had knOw-
edge Of the charge OF adultery being made on behalf OF
MI TitOn until some time in the year ls7i-in July,
think August OF ls7i-and presented that IA an ex
cse his chan gng his relations and forfeitng his
pledge ~ Mr.. Tit0n. Now. propose 70 show,
Sir, that in the interview With the gentleman
upon the stand, subsequently followed by
a confidential interview between the same gentleman
and Mr Tlton and MI Mouon Mr. Tracy WIS then at an
early day explicitly Informed Of the charge made by Mt
Ton against Mr. Beecher and that after that his nego
atous his conferences his advice and his cooperation
were given to and united the exerons OF Mr. Tilton
Mr. MouOn IN reference to the subsequent events oil
this scandal and that thus knowing. from authen,ic
source, 10 wit, the witness upon the stand
from a which aferward received the
appreciation and adoption Of Mr.. Tilton. to whom Mr.
Tracy made his plcdgehat after receiving this informa
ton hr continued his relations with Mr. Tton and re-
deemed the pledge for long period Of time which he
had given Ia Mr. Tlton in regard Ia his relation TO him.
Now cannot go through. Sir the details OF all this
evidence, 10 show your Honor the position which Mr.
Tracy took in his examination in regard 10 the knowledge
the precise charge made against Mr. Beecher We pro-
pose give this with other evidence. to show that Mr.
Tracy prior to the summer OF 1874 at which he locates
hs discovery which released him from his professional
obligations, he suppoSes, we'll knew and under
stood that the charge of Mr.. TitOn against Mr.
Beecher. when, in the language OF Beecher, "you
came to the bottom facts" OF that charge,
when it not attempted TO be concealed
for purposes known 70 the different parties interested
in it-thst Tracy well understood what WAS the extreme
and criminal character Of the accusaton and this, Sir
"a Of the circumstances the history Of his negot
tons with Tilton and his friends propose to give in
contradiction v Mr. Tracy TO show that at the time Of
these interviews the Fall of 372 he well understood
what vas the Of This accusation and II was the
same then 1t in the Summer " 1874 and as 1t Is
to-day We have certainly far inquiry OF Mr. Tracy
il commemorative have certainly laid the foundation for
this proof because have drawn his attention spe
officially the conversation to the subject and to the
Language.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
ARGUMENT OF MR.. EVARTS.

Mr. Eyarts-NOw, your Honor will perceive
that there Is no basis rules OF evidence tins
inquiry. II inquiry had been made, what Mr. Tracy
had said the Witness to wit. Mr. Woodruff, and Mr..
IL, then, what Mr. Tracy said,
ia contradiction of Mr. Tracy and would be in the
Of collateral impeachment forwhch foundation must
be laid in that way But here is interview between
Mr. Tracy and Mr. Woodruff neither OF them parties
the suit and Mr. Woodruff statements never evidence
in that sense in any way Gen Tracy asked whether Mr.
Woodruff told him 80 and and Gen Tracy, giving the
answer that he has given. says, He did not tell me 50
be threw intiat0ns insinnations or observations
or gestures leaving certain implication In my mind
Now II is not impeachment Of Gen. Tracy having
made extra-jIdcial statements himself inconsistent with
his testimony under oath; that is. the form OF collateral
impeachment on extra.udicial statements. Now, the
counsel himself calls out from Mr. Tracy cross-exam
nation 70 this point Enquiry whether Franklin Woodruff
did not beforehand before this interview Of Sunday
so and So order that that may have some bearing on
something or other. What passed between Mr. Woodruff
and Mr. Tracy Is not evidence against anybody, any
Interview there pretense Of that That does not
bind Mr. Beechcr does it bind Mr. Tlon Vow, hav-
ing asked that question OF Mr. Tracy which Is not of
exrudicia statements Of Mr. Tracy. but OF whether he
had certain information before he into an inter
view the counsel calls this witness TO contradict
Cen Tracy. As matter of evidence IN chief ii can
not be introduced because n u outside Of rebniial
All the interviews between this gentleman 4ld Mr. Tracy
wpr brought IN ns matter OF direct evidence the part
of the plaintiff and IL they omitted 10 prove any part Of
the conversation AZ that ne that they bad any night 10
prove why then would not be admissible evidence
IN chief Tor Il l.. not IN rebuital; in accumulation II
IL be ANYTHING Then II it IL not eXrajudcial state
nent OF cen Tracy contrary something that he has
given on the stand. it does not 10 Inc that II Is
within any of the rules of Impeachment.
Mr Deach-YOur Honor NAV Der'IaUS--
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04

Judge Neison-I do not that his opinion about ~
being unfavOrabie circumstance not, is st ~
terial-a mere opinion.
Mr.. Beach-It is just his opinion, Sir, ~ your Honor
please that after the very thing are sek
ing for On Nov. 10 what the opinion OF Tracy A 10
the guilt Of Beecher and to the charge which Tos
made against Beecher go FAR Mr. Tracy IL concerned
and his credibty concerned With the jury, that IL tho
essential and main inquiry.
judge NeilsOn-You may ask him whether OF not no
notice 10 Mr.. Tracyturn tO your question ~ him
OF The advance Of 500 by M Beecher for the benefit
Mrs Tlton family. but not 90 beyond that not take
Tracys opinion that that the worst feature o Tho
case. because u IL mere opinion.
Mr. Beach TO the witness We'll, Sir did you give that
information 70 him A. did.
terms. do not object TO the question In those terms
that say, the direct question Did you tell Mr.
Tracy that OccasioRF' TO Mr.. shearman.i Where
this evidence
Judge Neson-That Mr Beccher advanced $500
Mr. Ev3rts-Ibat Mr.. Beeoher had given to aOuton.
for the support or the benefit OF Mrs Elton AMI Mrs
Tiltons family. 500.
Mr.. Beaeh-Or substantially that
The Wtness-I told him that.
Judge Neilson-You told him that : A. Yes, sir
them this remaining question: winch think not Al ."
material is 70 Mr. Traeys opialOn saying II WA tho
worst feature
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04

nation than To oome to that piazza and STU A. you
asking about occupation did not have any occupation
during that day that h. tho greater part OF II and OUT
Of sympathy for Mrs Tton and at her invitation went
every morning.
@ Now Sir on that day that Mlss Turner testified can
you recolect what day Of the month it vast A. No. Sir
I don't.
Q. Where did you come from that day when you
around 70 that housei A. From my room sr' In
Courtst.
q Well how are you able TO fix the time OF day. A
can only fix it, Sir. by thisthat FOR number OF days.
indeed may say weeks had in the habit, after
lunch going around to rooms and seeing that they
were open and properly ventilated and my man there
and then after reading the papers, OF going around 70 see
Mrs. Tilton.
O And that ia the only mode by which you can nix the
time now A. Yes. Sir have mott did not pay any
attention 20 the time, except
O. Did YOU look at your watch while you were out on
the pisszaf A. No. Sir; don't remember that did
q Then how do you know that you spent two no'irs
there Siri A. know that there all the afternoon
Sir more than two hours.
O. After you got there A. After got there.
O. Did you look your watch when you entered the
house A. No, Sir; but know that went directly
from my rooms the house.
O. Did you look at your watch while you were IN Tue
roomt A. No. SIR don't remember.
Q. How do you know. theni A. Because they nave
clock there; [ may have looked at that do not re-
member.
O. You don't recoleot whether you looked at the clock
or mott A. don't remember
O. Then how do recoect what time OF day IL was
A Well nv own idea OF time the only thing can go
| by. Sir.
O. Well are you able TO do it without watch or cock'
A. Well AN able Judge Of the time between iuhon
time and tea time.
C. What time did you have tea. Mr. Martini A. re-
member Sir that Bessie Turner said 10 Mrs. Oyngton
that Gen. Trscy's desire WIS
O. don't care about that want to know what Time
| A. Well we had tea early: think about o'clock
O. Well how do you fx the time that Cen Tracy lott :
A. Well can H. the time Sir. from Gen. Tracys having
| gone and Besse-Miss Turner having come backbone
out and together having had conversaon Tor quite
| long time maybe more than one hour
O. Yes there quite long time elapsed AFTER Cen
Tracy left before you had teal A. Well should think
about an hour
O. Didn't You say than an hour Just now A
Wen IL light possibly have been an hour or Less
O. But you think 1t might have been more than IN
| bourf A Ny best impression is it was about all hour
| sir
Juror is Mrs Ovingtons house on the west side OF
| the street,
| Mr. shcarman-Yes Sir. Mrs Ovingtons house Is on
the west aide of Hicksst- ITO the witneSsl one mo-
nent; Juror asks what time you had your lunch A.
We lunched Sir about II O'clock always at MI Tton s.
O. Did YOU have your lunch theret A luched thorc
| that same day.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
THE FIGHT TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY
REOpENED.

Mr. Eyarts-Well, must have, If your Honor
please the ruling the part Of my learned friends
that we been submissive 10 making heretofore.
and the ruling has been express against us to which
have conformed that the question should be: Did you
tell hmP'
Judge Seilson-Yes.
Mr. Evarts question that was asked Of Mr..
Tracy and he Is 10 answer yes OF no.
Judge Sesou-Nes.
The witness May tell who had the evidence front
Judge Seson-So.
Nj Evarts-No.
Mr. Beach-Don't say anything abouit. Just say what
you said.
Judge Eeison-Cannot yOu put the question in the
terms thai il was put 10 Mr. Traeyt ~ - .-..- ..- .
MI Beach, did. Slr. a. Did you tel him that II was
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
4 CONTRADICTION OF MISS TURNER.


Mr. Morris-Well, Mr. Martin, you say that
you were on the piazza there after you came DOWN S
about two hours A. ] should think So SIR
O Co, Tracy and Miss Turner were IN conversation III
the back parlor A. Yes, Sir
O During the whole OF that times A Yes sir.
q And could Won hear enough 10 say-tO designate any
,oh,ect about which they talkingi a. No, Sir.
O Now after Mr. Tracy left, at o'clock. where did
YOU 20 theni A. remained Sir at Mrs Ovington Ior
a.. r remained there until about O'clock; we then
went 10 tea.
O. Had tea about o'clock A. Yes, Sir.
O And where did you 60 after tea A Immediately
after tea. Sir took Miss Bessie Turner around 10
Augusts stoss house Monroe place to meet the Com
nlitteo. .
O And about what time il that you got to MI
s,orrss house A. Well should think. Sir as nearly as
can remember about O'Clock possibly little AFTER
% Wa there any reason your taking her around SO
earyf A. only give you, Sir the reason she gave
O. Then YOU went TO Mr. ovingon's at about half past
O'Clock A. should think so, Sir a. nearly as I
O she was IN conversation with Gen. Tracy, and yon
t,ok her around 10 MI etorrs's at O'Clock about
O'Clock A. | should think yes. Sir.
O And did she remain Mrs. ovington's all the
whet A During all Of the afternoon
q Yea n A Yes Sir
O And until you took her 20 the Committee 4. Until
Y look her TO the Committee. and left her there.
q Now after Gen. Tracy left was there any CONVEX
cation between Miss Turner and one else In reference
10 th case-the subject OF her estlInonIi a before
tho Committee do you mean
Mr. Eyarts-One moment; where is thatt
The witness-Yes Sir.
Mr. sherman Wait one moment we object to that.
Judge NefaOn-The fact that there wac a CONVEX
station may be given
M Eyarts-U Mess II IL m rebutta suppose not.
Mr. Morrs-Yes that Ia. She testified that she did not
talk with any that subect that 1t was not men
toned except with Tracy during that ten minutes
That In her testimony. ITO the witness Now wasn't
that the principal topic Of CONVERSATION aiter Gen Tracy
left with Miss Turner and Mrs. OvlngtOnt
Mr. Sherman ITO the witness rWM you be KIND
enough 10 wait before you answer.
Iudge Sefson-The witness Is not Intercepted as 10
what was said but as 70 the simple fact.
Mr. 5hesrman-So, your Honor but be was asked
whether conversation was had that subject which
ansvers all the purpose Of bringing the subject of
especially called
vsrsa,on upon that subject except about ten minutes be
fore she went in.
Mr.. shearman-Yes but If her attention had been
called particular passage IN accordance with the III
variable rules Mise Turner might have rec0Iected some
Particular person who had said something about IT, Her
attention was not called 10 that and Is shows the neces
uyof enforcing the uniform eof crossexanato by
which The witness Is entIed the name OF the per
Here IN person living I'm Mr.. Ttton's house VINO
bad goue there obtain information from time 70 ne
and who every day that lac could pick up infOr
Nation. Why wasn't his name mentioned before so that
hS Turner might have bad waiuR Thai certain per
sa-
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
MR. TRACY INFORMED OF THE MONEY
CONTRIBUTIONS.

Mr.. Beach-Yes, Sir, and can We not prove
the other circumstance that he him notice that this
man. Beecher without any obligation or debt TO induce
him to do IT, was making contributions OF $500 for the
purpose supporting Mrs Tton and her family without
the knowledge OF the husband, and that when Tracy
heard that he pronounced the most damaging cir
cumstance in the whole history OF the transactions
Judge Neilson-weu. now. as to the money First, we
have that proved IN various ways.
Dir. Beach-Not in regard to the 800
Judge Neilson-Not the $50O-the other money
Mr. Beach, am not talking about the other money
Sir
Mr. Evarts-It IL part OF 10.
Mr.. Beach-It is no part OF II.
MI Evarts-why, yes, 10 IA.
Mr. Beach-You say II ia. say it amt. IL ID a
part Of the ~ 900, but not Of the $4,000
Judge Neilson-we have a large amount Of evidence
TO money advanced by Mr. Beechcr OF which, it APP
pears went TO benefit Of Mrs Tlton herself and some
OF went other including Bessie Turner's school
ing that that very clearly before and has GER
tain amount Of Endorsement by Mr. Beecher himself.
Mr. Beach-Yes but there is nothing before 10 show
that Mr. Tracy received knowedge-had knowledge OF
the contr buttons OF money at the time Of the interview
on sunday, Nov 10.
Judge Neilson-I do not how il is mate rial that he
knew ii or did not It and the other branch Of your
inquiry is simply calling for Mr. Tracys opinion, 10 w.t.
that it the feature. Well now, do not
his upinon-mere opinion. He said it the ea
ture Of the ease Suppose he said
Mr. Beach-Ie said, IL your Honor please, that all he
knew suspected then improper solicitations that
he never heard OF anything else That what he says
Judge NeilsonWell. have taken the answer ON the
vital point.
Mr.. Beach, know we have upon that II Is rery
vital aud material question. too whether stranger to
the household Of SIR Tton shall make these cOnribn
tions Of 800 and when they communicated to his
counsel. Mr. Tracy and he pr0nounces 10 the most
damaging circumstance, does not reflect. SIR upon the
question Of tue integrity OF Tracy when he that he
bad saApcon knowIedse VI any other oaargs than
improper solictationsi
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
MIR. wooDRUFrs TESTIMONY OBJECTED TO

MR. WOODRUFFrS TESTIMONY OBJECTED TO.
Mr.. Eyarts-0ne moment, MIR. Woodruff On
what point in Mr.. Tracy's evidence Is this oferedf
Mr.. Beach-well cannot refer to the page ex-
amined Mr Tracy AZ tn that
Mr. Morris-Ho said that Mr.. Woodruff CID not INFORM
him that the charge was adultery
MI Beacb-He did not inform him OF the money he
offered
Mr. Morris-Oh. the $5OOi
Mr. Eyarts-well. am asking him to look for the
passage.
Mr. Beach, who rcadsl:
We'll Mr. Tracy. passing that did you, in The CONVEX
.aion when You had with Mr. Woodruff preceding the
MI M1ultons stndy OF wch you nc ns OF this
scandal It is calledf A. When inierV'" 10 you reie
o, Either Of them A. Yes. Cir, ,,.,,..
q Wblcn one was 1.-THE one immediately preceding
o. In those interviews-precedin interviews-of which
speak did Mr. Woodruff relate ~ you to clfcnstihceS
NJ IN" con fe0n or statement OF MrS 1lt0n ana heI
traction and reassertiOn-thOsc prclllharies a. NO.
Sir not in detail ,,., ,,,,o than, Ih,ve
the i'm pressOn that at the second inervle" WIN lr
Woodruff he stated to me that MT MouIt0n haI = =.
know Sir ii things were stated by him in genera RAJ
terms A. have an impTe'5on int nc possession. and
Vow SIR in those interviews did Mr. Woodruff In sub
s,Snce tell you thai MIR Tton charged Beecher with
adultery with hs Criltonsl whe' A. NO. =" "e u "o'
in those words
Mr.. EVartS-NO, lncauiHS'i
said in substance SIR, A. cannot say that he did
in substance. ~ ~ .
O. Will you that he did not, in substance, tell you
that A. think will.
you viii.
Now the next answer is lReading.l
A. Well will state how can state IT, and the only
way can state 1t lac did not say that in substance m
nv Judgment according to my recollection; but MI.
Woodruff by gestures and what ne omitted To say IN
answering OF my questions and his nsinuatoils
left an impression upon my mind that he believed MI
Beeccr had been guilty OF something that was very
wrong in Mr. Tilt6ns family; what it was he did not
state and he did not leave me to infer.
O. Then he il asked, Will you swear positively tha IN
the interviews of which are now speaking, or one OF
them Mr. Woodruff did not in terms tell yon that Mr.
TTltOns charge against Mr. Beecher was adultery with
his Tlltons wifei A. Will.
O. Positively A. Yes. Sir. - -
That he did not use the term adueryF A. will.
q And that he did not in any more direct form than
Won have stated convey implication Of that charge
A. Yes; [ have intended to state, and think have
stated.
Now these are the interviews "a understand or
one or the other interviews that preceded the
Sunday interview OF which you inquired, MI Beach
Mr. Beach-Yes, Sir.
Mr. EVarts-Al this in presence OF Mr. Tracy proceeded
the interview at which Mr. Mouiton was introduced.
The Witncss-Ycs, Sir.
New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04
FRANKLIN WOODRUFF RECALLED.

Franklin woodruff Was rtCaheu NY Pi'iiU'ii
Mr. Beseh-Mr Woodruff on your former ex'IhniS
ton YOU testified ~ conversation between yourself
Mr. MouIton Mrs TiltOn and ar. Tracy at Dir Moinoh
study A. did
q preyous To that understand that you bad an inter
Wow mr. two with Mr. Tracy aonef a had one alone
O. One alonet A. One with Mr. Moulton-
O. In the conversstionin either OF those two CONVEX
satons before the main at the study did you give
Mr. Tracy any information regard to the charge OF &c
cusation which Mr Tbn made against Mt BHecher' ana
II So what did you stated
, 1875-08-16
DEATHS,

DEATHS,
Asi1-As tho residence Of his father, 3ss West
JAkhon-st.. Mr. Charles @. ASH oldest SOC OF William
II. And Il. J. Ash, Aug. IL, 1876 agel Is years and
ulonthH.
MASKELI-At her late residence, I'll South Des-
rl.ncs.s1., Catherine tho beloved wife OF W J. Mas
kell
The renninn Of tho deccaaed viii Ia removed to 81.
Tatrick's CAutcA at ~ o'clock, and viii oave tle
church at II o'clock aud proceed by carriages lha
cars for Calvary.
kOLAN-Qn Sunday Aug. il, Timothy Nolan
q nnt!gn pf C0uaty Carlow. Ireland.
Funeral from lis Into Fesicnce. No. ~ Lnml,cr.st.
Tuesday, tho 1'th inst., At IL a. m to IIs Family
Church, thence by eArrinEes U Calvary Cemetery.
Friends are Invited 10 atted without further notice.
0AV1S-On this 1Ath 1nst, Mary Allls, infant
daughter 0f William anlt G 4tIsrtno GaYin
FuncFtsal from tho ,es1icncc, Nh i4ia Huter1cll.a
on Monday, tho 1Ilh last, at ~ H.. by chrragn to
Calvary CcIuecry. Friends Of the family lnsited
to attend+
RosE-Aug II, At II p. H.. Marahall A. Ross, agsd
~ yeArE.
E!ieulanp will b. sent East.
kv- New York City rapcTs pIeaEo ccry.
BOTSFOND-The funeral services Of tho infant
child Of Henry and Emma UoAford will he hHlJ ut the
fauily residence, l12d Wabash-ay., on Tuesday tho
It'll inAt., At =. nj.
, 1875-08-16

Ous Of lilo attractions Of Chestnut et3ees'
Philadelphia. day or swo sgo was 4 6anys eas.
tLst avyry lew stops tue t.shsr. Who wheeled tae
coach, would turn aud louk IN piseoua tnsnnot'
az though alarmed by The nosorlety thrust u.,-
On hiult At female who brought up tho tsat'
' she rss svlasusiy proud u the s'zo OF her o.E.
spfipx and to Ill lnqulTefs would eagerly tepiY.
HYos I'm tue mo<her." she stated shAt The
child wss 18 months old thai day. Two months
svo it " eighel bU pounds, but row WeKhs much
more,-probably III pounds. Whsn born it 1sa
aot noticeable for my great aka, but It has zap.
, 1875-08-16
HISTORY OF THE LEGAL TENDERS.

Senator John Sherman, In his recent speech in
Ohio glyen brief but clear history Of our legal.
teudos currency from February, 1sG2, wheu tho
act was passed, until LOW. We mako tho follow
iug extract. which s well worth reading:
romomber ali tile circumstances connected
with tie .rst HnI all tho succeeding lha,os OF
Unl.od btatca notes. and took as effective . part
An any ono else In providing for their ibsua. 1t
Maa III FEBRUARY, 1862, altar the banxa had Huh.
pended spocie payments. whom our armies lad
tuAdo uo progress, our EoYanuos wore cut un BY
tho War. aud our expenditures were mora than
$I.0uU, UUU day. I'hoge we're tAen lying on Inc
table Of Slr. Chase, Secretary Of tno Treasury,
requlB!t.ous for o1er ss1, ,000. .uo0 to pay our
soldiers. and to supply them sith food, a,nu1.l
nItoi,, 4ld transportation. Our bonds conld
hut ua EOlu, for there MAS Du currency to pay Tor
tlietn. We had TO lnHTe tho notes OF tho United
states Ill the form Of cur,eucy. aud yot NJ
part OF the public deht. Ihe ony
,usst'on WAS whether shsy, ,shonld be =
payment vi de1tA. Upon lhs polut
l'aL clear convictions. lott that II our soldiers
wole 10 be compelled to take taese notes IL
moacy that wo wcre bound. II we could. to ro-
AHhe esetyboGy else to take thom ~ money.
Nv could nut leave them to the tendcr lnarcirs
Of creditors. shasers, aud up|,atrloho meu. who
woh!a 9laa'y decty and ropuulA lAto these notos.
We therei9'e m4de tlleu legal tender, and the
depreciation. We sssotuliy limited tic
smouns;, ~e made them receivable
ttam ~ tnr., tn'asr ,nsesras y n,.% taAes' "e msds
ahd We n'sde them eoEYel s,lle into bopds tito
inserust of Which WAS t'1yAble II. gold, and tiio
dutlea 9E ta1es gu Imported goods wers made
payable u go!d' =, s4at We would hayo Au ample
fluid Ia Hola ~ pAy the intvre4t. Afsur 4ll this,
No limited tbs aisuuut eoJoau which we would
never 10, 1t jAoo, ,otD. .6Uo. such was tho caro
aud solicitude with which We ho4geu Ii ne
kseelLkckB, and etary dullAr af tArnl was issns,
/ ujrk N ttIkJ|tS n md
, 1875-08-16

Idly grown from that ttu,n. Ths nlntf.er -.
wofns,. OF ordinnry tlzc. arh should .nnttoes ron.
t;nue in tt1n!r present coIrhc the confidently
expects thu. her boy will ba mibtakon for tla
mother'a father.
Iho r}es Moinrs {,a.) Regisfer says, "About
twn woeG. s'nco Mr.. Munnon boohkcorer at tin
Il. Il y. 81. Rh'lroht office became t1ie father Of
tho smallest hoy, and tho little ctnu weighed,
when first n,alo acquainted wl.ll thin wlcke'i
worla. exactly 2poanta. It Ia 40 sfnnI1 that II
iaols like sl.,tl. 1ta feot arc zach hhout ill.,
chcs lbnv. anil Tho othsr limb, atc prom,r!ion-
IuuQ l{fph