The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-05-27
DECISIONS.
SUPREME OoURT--cHAaIBERg.
Nv INDIA lawrence

Knapp vs.. Ly1es; fnune Is. Frost; Church Va.
Waldron ct NJ IN me natter OF 6urden; Levor
VS.. Jaxnelsuef; Castiler vs.. O'Dononue; Devoe vs..
Muller; rotten vs.. rotten; De Mora Gulioyle;
Gouraud ". Spencer; Reed vs.. Alien stevens vs..
stevens; ia Tile matter Of Ellen Brown; Mcguire
vs.. Blu ke; IN the matter OF Adelne NJ. Cooke;
BrIaug is. DcForest.-Granted.
Brown VI. ne Mayor &c: Ahern VS.. Benefit
GeBhard vs.. TIE Mas or ct al Porous Plaster Com
any W. Day; Wholesome Furniture Company vs..
Beaton SKINNER vs.. fulcn; Burning vs.. Wattles In
the matter III Geo &c !. Hayeu.-Orders Granted.
Benedict ". W,lmut Manufacturing company
The order entered Is correct anu must stana.
Ffisaander VI rrledander.-A ndavit should
more fully sIate the Efforts which nave been made
to anu defendant IN this STATE.
Baester Lie Association Of America-MusI
give notice OF motion.
Ingersoll vs.. Mortimer-E do not regard this af-
ndaIt as sufficient. The anloavtt OF Ferguson
does not show tnat ne mas received information
that the deiendant mas departed rom TINS state
but simply thdt ne has gone away, wnich may
mean nat he mas removed from MS late resi-
dence to another. snail require fuller af1davtt
as 10 the attempt 10 serve tue defendant and to
ascertain his whereabouts.
In the matter Of iare.-I cannot approve OF tnls
bond for the reason tnat there IS but one surety.
Rule 90 requires two sGreties. l nave signed tue
order.
Huloner vs.. Rooseveit.-Motlon denied. with Sla
costs.
Crook vs.. Foster.-Memorandum for counsel.
smith VS.. WOrsteiL-Motion granted; parties
Patrlck " Lem ist-The objections co this order
are tina; il repeats the language OF the memoran-
dum OF the decision ana Il not IA proper form on
any appeal winch may ne taken RON the order
IA resettled. The question sought to be raised OF
MIR. Foster be and neces iartly must be dis
missed because the memorandum 1let on the pre-
vIous decisions viii Ue incorporated with she case
on appeal.
Eorsch vs.. Freudenthal; Bayles va. Kiersted Hill
chen VI. Hcnen.--Motion denied.
Cohen VS.. Coaen &c al. Merchants Exchange
National Bank vs.. MateryIlie Manufacturing Com-
pany.-Orders granted
Key VS.. slrachan.-Motion granted unless
plaintiff pays $40 costs OF motion and put cause
On Gale ndar aud take notice OF trial Tor June.
Christopher and Ten n street Railroad Company
VS.. Central Crosstown Railroad Company.-TaXa~
ton affirmed.
Kiersted vs. Bayles.-Receiver agreed on by the
parties appointed IN the case.
Minard vs.. cnaYach.-MOtion denied. Memo
randum.
CItzens' National Bank OF waterbury We,
Holmcs-Ict an order Be entered allowing plain
tin TO enter Judgment, with provision that in
case the compromise Is carried through the JudQ-
ment be vacated aud tie oeiendauG De allowed 70
defend.
Robertson Wing vs.. Robertson; Brown VS.. smith;
Wecn smith; Wing Va. SAtth.-Memoran-
dums
In the matter or LeinKauf.- Granted.
Jefferson Car Company vs.. Eris Railway Com
pany.-Alowance q $4,000 70 Martin & smith AMI
$500 to Mr.. Nash
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM
~ Judge Van Worst
Laverty vs.. keyes ct aL-Order settled.
COMMON PLEAs-sPEcIAL TERN
BY Judge Robinson
Wood vs.. The Mayor, &c.-Judgment for 40
BIZ Judge j. f. Daly.
Selby VS.. selby.-Counscl fee; alimony granted.
Opinion.
FAMOUS vs.. TraQeser-Motion for new trial Dc.
MED. see opinion.