New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-04-20

O Did Il erow ont OF the conversation on the 1sti
=. Yes-No sir-yes; the conversation on the LIST
O. And what did you say to Mr.. Moulton with refer
q contemplated letter 10 Mr.. Boweni A do not
recall IL; all my recollection s that In discussing these
Stories utterly false that Mr. Bowen
had told and tn commenting upon the addition to them
that had made, when no had stated his word Of honor
that they false and In regard TO some that he knew
personally, that they were false
Q. Now, Wal you state n you please what was your
object In writing Mr.. Bowen on the I'd OF January
A. My object dsabuse his mind Of the impressions
that had left upon IT, supposed, by my statements
O. Was that ALT A. That all that recolleet now
q. You did not expect to effect any other obeeti a
do not recollect; do not now recall any other ou'e
that / had than that, 10 right q wrong. .
You did not expect to do anything else n Inan the
mind OF Mr.. Boweni A. So far l recolect now that
my only idea nj,
lost posoni A do not recall any such netive on my
part ,,,
@ Well, how did IL happen II you were so overwhelmed
tons Mr. Mouon which caused him TO write the letter
YOU were walking MP and down the room such mental
agony and distress weeping protnsely tninsg what
you had done toward Mr. Tlton-how did IL happen tn'
the next day when you wrote the letter to Mr. BOWEL
plain that A. writing 10 Henry G. Bowen IN Que
ease, and was talking to Mr. Tiltons representative III
the other
"BRoeKLYy, Jan. 2, 1871.
"MY DEAR Mr.. Bowen: Since saw you last luesuhy
have 10 think that the only eases OF wnGn
spoke you in regard Mr. Tt0n were exaggerated III
being reported to me; and should be unwilling 20 nav
anything said, though il was but little weigh on yo
mind ira matter important 10 his welfare am III
formed by whose judgment and integrity grtay
RELY and who has the OF forming an opinion nu
than OF that he knows OF the whole maL.o
Mrs b. and that the stories are not true anu ..
the with other stories To TINS 90 NJ,
wish any reply thought 1t only due to Jnsuce 'n'
should so much" - ~. q,
You did not even want reply from My. Bowen IL
seems A. did not, it seems . n, -
O. Well didn't you want learn whether you did re-
move from his mind any impression that you mane ny
what you said him A. do not recOllect that dld.
q. Well. didn't yOu carei A. do not recoiect tiae
thai into my mind at all ~.o,
Q. Well, didn't you whether your letter eHec'eu
the mott A. do recOllect that hdu any
consideration of that kind. >, i, =.
O. What good did you expect that letter would 90 W
Mr. TiltOni A. 10 would take away the strength-"ndt-
ever force there in my statements 10 Mr. Bowen
q. Which was but very little you say A But HUE
but whatever there was OF them.
O. Did YOU 90 to see Mr.. BOwcnl A. did not.
.. Have any interview with him, correspondence
with him upon the subject A. None. A.,
q. And that Il all that you said, and all that you
In regard the injury which you supposed you had IN
ficed upon Mr.. TtOn through Mr. BowenI A TOOK IL
all back. =, -. ,
o. Il that all YOU said or did, A. That IL all that
said or did : far = | recOect now.
q. You sought no interview with Mr.. BOweni A. Noho
at all.
O. Sent no mcssagei 4. Sent message.
O. And had correspondence other than the lettcr
have read \. And had correspondence OlDer IMAM
that, 50 far as my memory now serves me.