The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-11-04
DECISIONS.
SUPREME coURT-cHAMBrRs.
BY Judge Donohue


Matter Of Tracy; MARITIME vs. Cohen; Mutual Life In
surance Company VS.. Millbank; Murdoch Campbell
Bradhurst vs. Caherwood; East River Savings Institu
ton VS. Hal CT al; Lyon vs. Ryerson Tradesmen's
Fire Insurance Company VS.. Cunningham; Stuart
Clark Coemer VS., Batty; Irwin Thomson; Sariol
VS. Doris krltzsche VS. Callem Matter OF Lloyd; Gold
mark vs. Bruno; Bull VS.. Van Deventer; Ready Roofing
Company VS. Falk; Lever Jaxheimer Douglas VS..
Thomson; Wood vs. Mackay; Brainerd vs. The Manu-
iacturers and Builders Bank; Same VS. Same; Jury
Wagstaf Powers Clark; Matter OF Peck Bradhurst
vs. Catherwood; Same VS. Same; Ballard VS.. Gunther;
Burchell VS.. McCahi; German Savings Bank Mat
term Knapp vs.. Norton; Bamberg Meyer; Taylor
VS. Moler Ely VS. Bresbn; Plumey VS. Comstock; Adj
9olnS w hauseni oarK vs.. wheeler North american
Lille Insurance Company vs. Ely; Ascough VS.. Wilson;
Mackellar Westeryelt; Ferris vs. Foran; Brice
Kamak Russell VS.. St Paul's African Methodist Epis-
copal Church, Willimantic Trust Company VS.. War
rem; Smith Vibbard Bogart VS. Kleckner; The Sun
Printing and Publishing Company Norton; Clafn
VS. Fox; City National Bank VS. shaw; Hegerrnan vs.
Kavananpb Barry va Donohue. Hays vs. De Wolf.
Phenlx National Bank VS.. Kennedy; Church Sails
bury; Smith vs. Faconer Bradhurst VS.. Catherwood;
Mutual Life Insurance Company VS. Lackng.-Graned
Earle VS. Keech.-When filled up | will sign
Louisiana National Bank VS. Schuchardt opinion
Matter Of the receivershp of the Germania Smelling
and Refining Works; Cohen VS.. Cross; Hoffman
Treadwcll; Harrington VS.. Gomperts. Memorandums
Tracy VS.. Benty.-Opnion.
Earl VS. EarlReferled 10 J. /. 0'Nel as to alimony
Matter of Donohue-I want to see counsel
Brainerd The Manufacturers and Builders
Bank.-Moton denied, without costs. See memoir
andum.
Partridge vs. Harrington Denied; the answer con-
tans general denial
Wondery VS.. Shepard -Granted per cent allow
ance.
Holdane vs. Whittnacht-Denicd Memorandum
National Bank of Poultney VS. Collier Bull Van
Deventer; Mason Falconor-Motions denied
Carkson Weikert-Dened answer states a de-
fence
BY Judge Lawrence.
Clark VS.. Van Loon.-0rder granted.
Delaney VS.. Maloney.-Default opened ON payment of
costs OF motion and defendants costs before notice of
trial Cause must also be placed upon the Special
Term day calendar for November for trial
VIC mo r. red IN ThOna IN
take testimony as to the proper amount TO be allowed
as alimony and reasonable counsel fee.
Alden vs. Disqualification continued until cause
can be tried
Person StevenS-Motlon denied, with costs.
Opinion.
Koran vs. Horan.-Referred to Edward Patterson to
ascertain and report what would be proper allowance
10 defendant for alimony, &C
Manufacturers and Builders Bank VS.. Asten.-Mo-
ton for leave TO amend answer denied, with costs.
Conner VS.. ConneI.-Motion granted, without costs.
Moran VS. Watkns-Motion for bill OF particulars
granted, without costs.
Phelan VS. Collender -Moton denied with costs
The Ocean National Bank vs. Carll.-Motlon denied.
Remer VS.. Spelman.-Granted
odell We. odelL-Further allowance of $500 for de-
PENDANT.
Willett vs. Kipp.-Case and amendments settled and
directed to be filed.
Stewart VS. Sherwood. and amendments set
tied and ordered to be 1led.
Matter of Farley-Beatty is only entitled to interest
his share of 81 40 and that the remainder of in
terest belongs TO the infant
Irving o. Terry Munice Terry.-Report of referee
confirmed and judgment of divorce granted TO plaintiff
Nieoil vs. Burgess.-Motion denied, without costs.
Kngsland VS.. Kingsiand. Exceptions overruled.
Nelson vs. Showing-Opinion-
Matter of Gbert-0pinion.
Beard Tobas.-0pInion.