New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-04-27


| " Daniels"-
Q. Said vhati A. She called me Daniels. instead ~
giving my fun Daniels there IL something
want show you" can't remember II made any re-
ply She read me part Of this scandal turned to her
and said Mrs. Woodruff II you publish that scandal.
scandal concerning any other ndivIia Cr In short,
n you have anything do with the private lives of
individuals whatever will have nothing more TO do
with you. and will not work with you again You have
right to touch the private life OF any You are at
work reformer and not 10 into the private lives OF
anybody" don't know that any reply made to me
q Was that the whole of that interview 2 A. No.
think not but II il all that can remember.
@ II is the that you gave 90 Mr. Shearman
A. Yes; and do not pretend, and did not pretend
then TO give the exact language there might be prcpo
ston A conjunction. word put in or left out
O. But you have given this crossezamination all
that you recai A. Yes, Sir.
O. thought you said something to Mr. Sherman about
an illusion Sfrs. Toni A. That was another AFFAIR
altogether.
O. What A. That waz another affair altogether.
O. No. it was in this conversation A. think you will
find. II you look back that you are mistaken
O. Then 1t was not I'm this conversation A. think
not It should not have been II II was
O. think you put 1t in this conversation ltshonid
not have been there.
O Where ouctt il TO be- A. II ought 10 have been an
other affair and another time and do not recall any
thing the circumstances do not know how II came
about only that Mira Woodruff was talking very eagerly
to some who came into the office.
O. There were no proofs present then A. No. Sir ;
nothing 70 do with proofs at this time Mrs. woodruff
speaking Of the scandal that had been Drted ABOUT
concerning Mrs TIlton and Mr. Beecher.
O. And Mr. Tiiton came in A. NJ. TttOn-l DON
know whether he in whether he WIS there Out
Mr. Tiltons flushed clear 10 his hair. and he says:
vcky, that is not true wife Is as pure a. snow
and such relation existed between Mr. Beecher
and my wife"
O. understood you give that in thu other interview
on your direct examination A. Did Mr. Sherman
dcrstand me in that way
Mr. shearman-It Is all right; think you stated it Is
you do
Mr.. Beach-Never mnd
The Wiiness-If sad 80. IT was wrong.
Q. When was this last conversation you nave spoken
Off A. It was long proofs brought
out this in 1871.
O. How long before A. II Was in tse first acquaintance
OF Mrs Woodruff and Mr. Triton; it was before the card
came out a. all.
O. Were the proofs shown after the card appeared
A. The proofs did not come out until 1877 ana the caru
came out In 1871.
@. And this conversation you now speak Of
Was before the card came out.
O. It must have been in January or February ls7l' A.
Or March or April May-I cannot tell along there
somewhere; IL was before the card came out
O. How long was it that you the proofs there be-
or six weeks possibly might have been only month,
but It probably two months.
@ When did you undcrs tand this scandal was pub
lishod A. In the Fall OF 372 it was common thing;
IL was known by great many before 1t published at
all that is, it circulated privately.
Mr Beach, move to strike OUT all the answer from the
words. " II was n common thing
Judge NeilsOn-Ycs.
O. And at the time that Mrs. Woodruff addressed you
In this way. saying. Daniels, have something want
to show YOU" to that eroct Mr.. Tton was the only
person present besides yourself A. He was she came
in and shut the door.
O. And she showed you the proofs A. No she read
it she showed TO after Mr. TiltOn had gone out
she put it in my hands after Mr. TtOn had gone out.
O. And nothing said except what you said Tn her
in regard to prOprey OF publishing the private Life
OF individualsf A. Yes. there was more said
O. Nothing that you recolectl A. Nothing that
recollect.
O. And when she said that she had something 70 show
you much did she read of the proof A can't tell
Won because saw it three four different times; read
it myself and can't tell which time it that saw the
whole Of 1t.
O. Have you any idea OF how much she read nowi A.
think she read the whole OF It,
O. You think she read the whole Of It. do youi A. l
think she read the whole that simply concerned Mr.
Beecher and Mrs TiltOn.
A. The whole OF the paperl A. Not the paper 1t was
slips proofs.
O. go far As IL related to Mr. Beecher and Mrs Tlton
l. think So still, | would not swear she read the
whole of it then because it several times, and
cannot swear which time it that saw the whole
Of it.
O. Was there any documents Incorporated IN the PROOF
she reads A. | think not.
O. No letterl A. No, Sir there was no letter she
brought il in her hand.
O. Have you now any distinct recollection Of any part
she read that You repeat it, or the substances A
Iuotu prfak Ike IN
because il was absolutely the same thing as published
O wait one moment. understand you say that you
would not undertake to repeat the substance OF it now
any part OF iti A. would not for although have read
the whole OF it aterward would not undertake to re-
peat it now.
Mr. Beach ITO Mr. Morrisl-r don't think want TO ask
any more. Is there anything elsef
MI Morris-No, think not
MI Beach-That is all. madam
REDIRECT EXAMINATION OF MRS. PALMER.
Mr.. Shearman-Was Mrs. Woodruff what is
commonly known as spirtualist
Mr. Beach, object 20 that
Mr. shearman-Tls lady has been asked good deal
about her belief in this examination. simply pro-
pose to show tins whole circle was one.
Judge Nelson-Tha was under the license OF crossex-
animation. No.
o TASK whether you believe in the God OF the Chris
tansi A. Most certainly do.
O. Do you believe in the Lord Jesus Christi A Most
! certainly do.
| Mr shearman-rhat Is all
| Judge Nelson-Thati is ALL Mrs. Palmer.
RE.CROss- EXAMINATION OF MRS. PALMER.
| Mr.. Beach-DO you believe in Christ as God
A. No, Sir.
| O. You do not believe in the divinity OF Christi A.
Most certainly do believe that your son is not you,
/ 4 HaIa fhaf fha Inp m ~