The New York herald., 1875-06-09
DECISIONS.


TIL for ne lull amount claimed, $540.
DECISIONS.
SUPREME couRr--cHAMDERs
BY Judge Brady.
Catnun9 vs.. Bronson Betnhera W. Wimerding;
The Nassau Bank VS.. The i1ttston and Elmrd
Coal COMPANY; Burnugame vs. Mattles Reese
vs.. Polenz Nassau Bank W. Williams Mower and
wilson; Blocn vs.. Stenharot Packer W.. SmitA; I;
Sandiora VS.. Wheeler; Criswo!d vs.. rranksrd; !;
pany ct al; Never VS.. Borren; Birmingham vs..
wattlcs Germania Bank vs.. 1remain Frank VS..
Farrell; Jones va. SenuZes Mlet VS.. Roach :
Waaenen IS. Hurd wnltehouse vs.. Fowler ;
Nassau Bank vs. Williams Mower and Reaper
Enrich vs.. Ehrlcn Veil ". Fultel; Packer vs.
smith; LawtOn VS.. Kinney August vs.. L0wen-
berg; Stad miller ". Johnson; Gene vs. Foster );
Malloy Council iilelwin vs. Halle; Edwards vs.
Dayton: McGlougnlm ~. I'M; Reed We. Genet /;
Kennedy W.. Arcner; Allen VI. Warren Scheloy
Dlehl: spanley ys. BurIis; Richter VS.. Prosch
Yveln vs. Smara; Dorenus VS. Williams; org vs..
Cocks; simon vs.. levman; Wilson vs.. Warrall: !:
Carol vs. carroll; Levy VS.. Hand in hana
mngs: same W. McLaughhn: same vs.. Glider
slceve; Nell ys. Men; Blackwell vs.. Pri9gen; car
roll vs.. Carroll; ingersoli VS.. HervcT Gerfoy
Miller; Sloie W. Tne Mayor, &c; 0'Connell vs..
O'Connell; Fitzgerald ~. uayton, Montelis ys.
briggs: Lodi Chemical works vs.. Gilbert; FISK vs..
BIRD: nc ard VS.. Grogan; Romor Moseman
VS.. MeeAan; Hodane w. Mlttnacht; Headdlng VS..
Ba!retto; Connor vs.. Mycr; koehIer W. handi-
bode Durant ". Campbell; sheridan VS.. McCar-
tn I. HerZDerR VS.. corey; bakcr W.. ODarnOlSer. I.
/ National FIRE Insurance Company w.. Barry ;
4 Buler VS. Wenle; Potter vs.. Voucn; Mcleague vs..
y McTeague; > OFT yS. Lextef; jenkins vs.. Drsgs
I Auoenri VS.. Iinchld; SOM VS.. Mccormack ;
4 New York Lille Insurance Company ". Orth <
Macomber VS.. Piatt; Hendricks vs.. TuocS ;
4 Boomlngdale vs.. Van Denberg; Ward VS.. Ward !;
! haus I'll VI. Gerst; Gross ". Rosenberg; Deve!n
VS. Schedel Hickman vs.. Turtle; wnteaker W..
lsnam; Harmau vs. Dusepbury; Scneiey VS. Dieh! I:
! Natlouai fire Insurance Company vs.. Barry !:
Millet ct AL. vs.. Colgan; Sebert VS.. kalbnelsch
Nassau Bank VS.. PItston ana Elmra coal Com
(
Jessup: Kann vs. thurman ;GottShe vs., sherman
higgins vs.. Murray Cowell vs. bye; MeTer vs..
Grissler ct al. vs.. Brownng..-This application is
| granted. subject however 10 be defeated hy the
service OF an amended answer IN good faitn and
Courtney vs. New York, West Shore ana G.
Railroad Company; woodruff W. Caldwell.-Memo-
WnIteKer vs. Isham; Packer vs. Kelly, Sheriff.
&c. Hoffman vs.. Lynch; Easleson VS.. Hunagle
Van WAGNER Va. heyde; Niuth Wari Bank VS..
Snaw; Van WaPener w. Hurd :Ihlsing VS.. Randall
/ skinner w. Finck; QuacSenoos VS.. Habricn; Jones
vs. ScnurZ; Pakin W.. kIader; Grlssler vs. Brown
ing; Greer vs.. Norton PeaKe va Stormes; Bondeil
vs.. same Irwin vs.. LIBBY; Richter vs. Prosch; Gould
VS. BaDcocE; Van Pelt W. Jacks; Wilson vs. War
rel: PeEdle; on VS.. Cooke; sixth National Bank VS..
ThErston; DorfInger VS.. Walton.-Urders granted.
Eisner VS.. Hanil- Motion dened, without costs.
Gautler vs.. lhe Douglas MANUFACTURING Com
Blarcner vs. Carman.-order granted, dismissing
motion.
4 Andrews VS.. Boorman.-T doubt very much
whether tors case can be tired IN an nour, nut give
the plalntlH tue DeneuJ OF uOuDI anu SET case
down FOR tnlrd Friday.
Helfensten VS.. Ferguson Order granted, deny
u By Judge DOnohue.
Thomas vs.. Tow nsend.-Order granted.
duncan VS.. sDe WitL-Motion denied. Memo
randum.
By Judge Lawrence.
Levy VS.. Tho Metropolitan Insurance Company
Same vs.. Greenwcn Insurance Company; Same
VS.. state Insurance Company, Mlsslssippl; In tue
matter II WIliams.-tirduteI
Clark vs.. Mcgormack-Bund approved.
la4 70 - IN IL m Qh ON
be denied on tnc gfOund of lacnes.
la the matter OF Lathrop.-Rnle 80 seems 20 me
10 apply 10 ihis case. anu cannot. therefore. con-
nrm The repor' uat tue time prescribed by that
y ParnIy rs. ward-I do not understand why this
action VAS necessary and shall not confirm the
report until am sttisued upon that point.
SUPREME coUET-srECIAL TERM.
BY Judge Donohue.
Youngs VS.. Carter ct al.-Motion denied.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPECIAL TERM.
By Judge Speir
Scheiva VS.. Freuud ct al.-M0tion for reference
denied until the issue Is decided.
Quackenbos vs.. West.-Order granted, and set
BIZ Judge Mcneil
Hamilton vs. Tue Third Avenue Railroad Com.
pany.-Settied. Upon presentation OF an engrossed
or D. inted copy it viii be ordered on file.
COMMON PLEAs-spEcIGI. TaRa.
BY Judge j. +. Daily.
II sheehy w. Tomnnson.-Order settled.
Mebber VS.. The Mayor, &c.-Motlon denied: no
costs see opinion.
\ Inurstop vs. Loewel-Motion denied with costs
preference and $40 costs Oi motion.
Z TO THE BAR.-All orders and motions returna-
bile IN Caamoers ON June Will stand over until
Thursdag. June 10. at the same hour. Tx parte
applications will be granted from ten 10 eleven
O'Clock on the 9tn wednesday,. by order OF the
court. " JARVIS, Jr., Clerk.