The Iowa plain dealer. [volume] (New Oregon, Howard County, Iowa) 1867-1895, 1875-03-12
~ t%htss
~ FttNl& WIN / tAf issta IN
M hIAtshAisils ~
WILLIAM
ettAeNvs N Nh NsiHv i rytIwu,
sMA 1 iAis

Ar..,s. slipn.. IL ~. issi

@@s@~
ct,Arfkn
Ar.sis Niun.. TIL. ~. issA
& N n l.. 4 Ntsssa,.At
usxsAs~ass~Ai snvl.*. hiles ffgsn
1ssas \ Hall. ~ IA in.s which ~
rlalns Ns>lf llstafn After teaiinx
Thk ereas WI ~ ,lrrn,' unity which !
Asse Lang wanted IL shaw NJ \ y
Wsishss silIian, In court I'm will
Mulies thai Wright s~esfs tbs, ~
eeld she tram ~ eist',. ard they were
yosss. NJ unly accounts faf ,~n note.
u oea each. Therefore. III stole the
ethes nosv III 80. Tlvu liz s~sars
that No ect .hv hetre aid ,sn,si,e ~
lsAdiAg I condemned .AJsanre. this y
o thin : falsxhued that hn. little
trouble Ii nessl~d II show II In hts
sAlss report n sou hs says ~. 21u
1911 waa ihs sale n ! tnarhine. hut
Aofsss. lis accounts fr machine IN
that sAy. nos then he aii not IN fac.
III : machins u uusess~ " ct these
nos@s. but hors~s, therefore hv must
have your machine himself o. shr rfo.
sss,ls thereof, aud .he notes taken e.
ths team ~ ! part thereof. arc snLs'i-
lussd II their place. This shows ron-
slssivsly that ihs nurses were not III
fAes yours. but Wright's, Tor u they
nod bssn yours hi. reports would show
that fact; would uns,dlslll show Whist
machirs was returned. condemned, and
also show that b. gave up tho notes 70
Tho party oondemning u; that the cou-
dsmnsd MAahinc Was traded for horse,
md tn trsnsaction properly entered IN 'hr
stock account; none u these things are
shown. simply because they never "a
isssd. II they had hc could simply
have reported the sale Of the horses.
insessd VI this, knowing the horses nrc
not yours " obtained BY any transact.
lon tsaisimstcly growing out u your
business. no describes an Advance
Reaper In detail, year made Nc., &c.,
and says no sold Il 10 Frank Guyoitc
lov two not~s u Sch each. This ma.
chine 10 describes must have been sold
70 somebody " must now BE- In thu
possession u wright and The relation
you sustain u 'suyetto il simply this,
Jour agent Wright without you,
knowledge " consent traded 10 you
o170 v Guyett's notes for your MA
chine vhisl, IL oil probability hs sold
IN good notes or cash That he hsd
any authority Tor this rsseslly transact.
low Il simply absurd, You hired him
10 scll nnchinrs and farn over q
you shs scsusl proceeds u such sale,
ut - appropriate ihpse proceeds and
Substitute IN their place cu,npsratiyel,
worthless noies. ~ hs Las In this 90,
q y shown beyond MI manner u doubt
BY the record. and ~ can ~ shown II
dosens d other cascs not now IN ques
t,On BY absolutely positive proofs ~ NJ,
poesss1iSn.
iou will please send me the sl,ee,
n WfIght's .alcs account n III II
which ~ reports the sale No. 200 Il
Frank Ouyette. this will enable me
70 establish In court BY hin own sigma
tuss oil The facts essential ~ this case
The point il just this: A. y. Wrigh
cold ! Mccormick Advance; be nays Ii
cid II 70 Mr.. Guycttc and turns ore,
bio notss Of ei70 20 show; Mr. Guy
80 says he did not bus reaper bu
) worthless horse fvr which he dor
asl propose 10 pay. and don't blan'
him. Lut Mr.. Wright has said over bj
own signature that he sold an Advance
reaper and u Guyctte; now u tho lat
tsr San show this 70 be untrue Nrigh
y convicted not only 81 lying~-~l,iel
y needless perhaps--lui u tliryinI
fsAuAulent transaction and the lirn o
r. II. u j.. j. Mccormick II ,indica,
% before tho people Vi this seetio,
from the slandcraus iuIAehoo,ls ii
eontsmrtAble combination ri rascals
Ths insbiliiy u either ono Il the hfu
" appear here personally u rroseenl'
Wright hsp worked much karn he In
taken every sdsAnsnge Of bis avoid
sncs u ! trial n Chicago on tho pure
y techaieal ground Il = want u juris
dIctlou. BY unsruslhully stating II Il
b.. because there was M caulo II nc
Zion whils Ii fact tho merits u III,
eass wore not taken into considcrsiio,
N any shape. This csss opens up III
opportunity 70 show In court that &
il. + l.. j. McCorm,ck had Ampl,
cause 10 pursue shs nourle they III,
With A. D. Wright while II also en-
sblss ins 70 yindicate myself PERSONAL,
q taking any action againss him TIM
The facts did nos require.
This letter n IN opsn onc. and vii
appear III the next Ltue 81 the tresc
PIAlH DEALxx; " NJ Wright feel, ~
gsiesed ~ any VI IT, statements. ] M
responsible for them III any why shar
" manner b. ch4ses 10 seek ,atirfas
ton. II By h,s favosIie nc,hod u r.
dsess through tho courts, ] will intrt
him thal unlike himself. wba. proper.
] have gol II IN ny own name and 81
- readily 6 - w any man whom
Respectfully Yours.
n +. GAATrAk.
CHAPTER IT.
copy"
N...ro -. I'll n ek-g