The New York herald., 1875-08-24

fendant vent on 70 say IL send you a number OF kisses
There Is no getting over woman . lIaugbterl Then
on the 3lst OF December he was rather gushing en1
my very dear dear Tam thousand kisses for my love
on the 26th Of April, 1874 he sent another letter DC
ginning Sam forgotten areadyP
His Lordship-kow, what is this letterY
Mr.. Snith-rhis one will read 70 you-''lt y now
a fortnight you lett should like 20 embrace you
and give you kiss Ny dear Tam, shall never sec
you again. Mine is very lonely lie at pressn sen,
the time she lived at Lechley she often met the uelen
ant
His Lordship-From 1872 to 1874 what occurred ?
Did he continue making love TO your
In answer TO Mr. smith, plaintiff went on to say that
the defendant came 70 her very often, indeed every
night or If he did not come, he sent her note IN
April 1874 she LEFT Letchley for Burnley From some
thing which she had heard she wrote to him about
lady and in reply he wrote her letter denying that
he had been seen speaking to a Mrs c., ana
added Mine is lonely me mere, ana II 90 afop @ ~
with female II rs only just TO pass away the Tune
His Lordship-'n is only just to pass away the
Mr.. Smfth-Yes, he says So my Lord. do not
know what he means Matters then went on in this
vay'i@
His Lordship-what do you mean by saying matters
went on in this wayS' The last l have is 'when |
drop in with female il is only just to pass away time
II you say matters went on IN this way, that would be
that he passing his time with female (Laughterl
Mr.. Smith went TO say, that on the Tth Of March
defendant wrote another letter, which was the rst IN
dicating cooness
His Lordship--How does II beginP
Mr. smith-'Oh, my dear Tam, hope and trust for
your own sake you are living In respectable manner
dis LordshpThen you call this the first part OF the
refrigerating processp
Mr. Smith-Yes. my Lord The learned counsel next
remarked that the 18th OF April the defendant
Kept up that process for he began with simple Dear
His Lordship-Is that the zero in your thermometer
Mr.. Smith-Yes, my Lord, 1t IS (Laughterl (rhe
learned counsel then read the letter mentioned IN which
he told the plaintiff that marriage must not take place
between them Well that when they got 10
He the learned counse did not know whether II was
possible 70 get oeo" zero ont there was elter SUD
sequenty written by the defendant IN which he referred
to Mrs. Goldsworthy
His Lordship said the only plea put in denial Of
the promise, and he supposed the affair concluded rs
matter of course with attorneys letter.
Mr. Smith-Yes, a matter OF course.
Plaintiffs examination was then continued She said
the defendant farmer but she was not quite GER
tain about the OF his farm though she had been
told il was about thirty acres He grew vegetables and
corn part OF it used for grazing purposes and an
other part used orchard and garden he also
made cider and he had told her that he made as much
$50 hogsheads when fruit was plentiful and these he
said worth from e. 10 four gulneas per hogshead
He had also told her he had horse for which he had
been offered f40 He had also some sheep and cow
Mr.. smith-He did not like Paddy Malone tell you
what he had in the bank
The witness did not reply and the learned counsel
said he supposed she did not understand the application
OF the story OF Paddy Malone
In cross examination plaintiff said the defendant lived
with his mother, and when she was at Letchley she
lived next door TO him. she kept school there and
occasionally helped her brother, who kept public
house, her husband died in 1865 the house in which
E3 year for it, she had four children by her husband
she knew a man named Roc who q cattle Jobber;
she had child by him two years after her husbands
DEATH she had not than child by Roe she did
not live with him. he came TO see her; she knew man
named Stephens and his wife but only as friends she
positively denied having had child by stephens.
Mr.. Edwards-You know Mrs Short!
Plaintif-Yes
Mr. Edwards-was not your child by Stephens kept
by SHORTY
Mr Edwards-Was IT Roe's child she keptY
u - l-rlv .nln nfpas1H glta bart
Mr. Edwards-What became OF the child you had by
Roe9
Paintn-It died month AFTER
In further cross examination she said she used TO
keep company with a named Wadge; he visited
her for two years. but ne did not stay all night he
came IN the evening and stayed short tune; her chill
dren always in bed at the time Of these visits
he did not to see her scores Of times at night he
came between six and seven o'clock IN the evening and
left between nine and ten O'Clock.
His Lordship-That would be in winter as well as in
summer In winter it would be after darkf
Piantf-In summer it would be light, but in winter,
Of course il would be dark when he left me at nine
Mr.. Edwards-Mr wadge promised to marry your
Plainhf-Yes; he did
Mr.. Edwards-Did Roe too?
Plantin-Yes he did.
Mr. Edwards-Dd Stephens promise to marry you?
Plantil-No; he was a married man.
Mr.. Edwards-0h, he was a married man.
His LOrdship pointed out that the fact OF Stephens
being married would not prevent his being de-
fendant in a breach of promise case. He himself had
argued thai point in the Court Of Common Pleas but the
Judges would not listen TO his argument
The plaintiff in further examination, said she knew
named Matthews who sold books he used 10 come
10 see her business connected with her brothers.
affairs, and she Indignantly denied that he ever visited
her at improper hours
His Lordship-Was Wadge on the same terms with
you as Roe except that there was no childY
Plainuf-No
His Lordshp-There was no Improperly between you
and WadgeY
Plaintif-No
In reply to Mr. Edwards, plaintiff said she did know
man named WOolcock, travelling draper but he came
rlvo tn ngoaL her. len ~
shower
His Lordshp-Have you not met Martyr in his barn
and had intercourse with himY
Plant1-Whatever took place before met Mr. Mar
tyn was thoroughly known to him; he knew all that
had taken place
His Lordshp-But you we're on intimate terms with
Martynl
Paintir-Under the terms Of promise Of marriage;
told him everything and he understood IL; that
before the correspondence; when he offered mar
riage said, ~ Will not deceive you"
Further questioned by Mr. Edwards plaintiff said that
from 1872 TO 1874 she did Martyr in his field
or in hgparn She generally met him at her own house
every night He did not go home next morning, and
never stayed after ten O'Clock at night
Mr.. Edwards-Till you went away TO Burnley had |
he intercourse with you wherever you could
ranger
Paintif-Under the influence of his promise Of mar
riage he had The plaintiff went say that she was
TO have been married TO Roe the license taken out
within few hours OF the time fixed for the celebra-
tion she found that he a married man. She !
from Cornwall to Burnley with her son, who was
sixteen years of age she thirtyeght years Of age
Mr. Edwards at this point produced letter from
the defendant in which he complained that he twas
put OFF, on one occasion when mo u was at hand;
and reply TO the learned counsel the plaintiff said
'NO. ~ Wadge.
Mr. Edwards-Did he send you any more Of this po-
etry-this STUFF
His Lordship-oh, Mr. Edwards, Mr.. Edwardsi
"Studl"
Further questioned, the plaintiff said Roe visited her
in 1866 and represented himself a widower After
she accepted Martyr she told Wadge not to visit her.
in explanation Of letter which defendant had writ
her advising her 10 lock the doors and 20 bed
early she explained that that done TO avoid the
violence Of Wadge, who had threatened to shoot her
because she had gwen him up"
Augustus Hooper, clerk employed by the Manches-
Ter, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway Company at
Manchester next called. He stated that he was
brother law Of the plaintiff and that he her
Letchley December, 1872 the defendant visited tho
plaintin the evening and introduced by the
pantln her sutor; the defendant styled her 'his
dear and his beaEmg toward her rather affection
ate, although nothing marked took place.
His Lordship-What do you mean by that?
Witness-Well, he didn't very openly express himself