New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-03-30

ing IL what they promised to do thought would be very
excellent thing"
Was any reference made by in that conversation TO the
fact that Mr. Bowen being Of two papers could not
aa 10 have such scandal as that publication would make
Yes Sir remember urging that as one Of the reasons
said Mr. Bowen had newspapers handthath he could mol
afford II.
O Could not afford what A. To publish such article. OF
" have such an article as that published.
O. Was any reply made TO that and 80, by whom A.
Well think Mr. Monitor and Mr. Tlton talked about 'ha''
they were very uncertain whether Mr. Bowen woud 10
anything; they didn't believe in 1t much .
O Anything said by them either ofthem, or BY MI W"
keon as 10 the effect that such publication vhoud DC ke
10 have on Mr. Bowen's business A. SAID tnousn'
would njurehmiuure the papers, and ihink tney al ~
scented to that; I.beieye they all -
Mr. Sherman epesnGl: II said Thought woad inJue
the papers, and they all assented TO that"
Mr. Reach think they all assened TO-"
Mr. Shesrman-Yes and think they all asseh'oo Z"
that"
O Wen did Won take that "Trpartite Agreement" to Mr.
Bowen that night! A. did Sir; think took it that night
O. Did yeu return TO this meeting after seeing MI bowen vi
that nghtf A. Yes, Sir.
O. What report did you make TO them as to M Bowent
Sisposition about settling this claim? A. Wei, said Mr.
Bowen did object TO signing the paper decidedly ooJect
su he said he would like read again after left and
he yould like to think Of it little told him there was
great improperly in his thinking Of H. and Wen-l talked
with Nj Bowen some little time.
Mr. Beach-Neyer mind what you talked with Bowen
Mr. Iracy-We what did you cay 10 them on returning
about what you thought Mr.. Bowen would do' A. SAID
thought Mr. Bowen would sign the paper and Mr.. Wikoson
said that had made great mistake II remember right, in
not getting him 10 sign IT, think Wilkeson said that
either Wkeson Tton said that that should not have LETT
it said there why should not leave t-why
Bowen should think Of take his time to consider OF H.
O. What was said about arbitration about arb1a'ns
the claim A. II was agreed-it was
Mr. Beach-Just repeat that, " 1t was
Mr. Shearman-"It was agreed"
The witness-I think Mr. Tlton Mr.. Mouon proposed
Mr. Charles Sors Of the arbator and then another
party talked Of the third and by don't exactly kn'
sugges by general consent MI James Freesnd
was agreed upon-Mr James Freeland-as the third man.
@ AT what meeting, and at what stage OF the meeting II
you remember Mr. Cahn, Mr.. Freeland's name men
honed as one OF the aIbators! A. think was that
evening, Sir
Q. Tuesday nights A. Yes, Sir
O. Do you know whether it before or after you had
seen Mr. Bowens A. think had talked with Mr. Bowen
about Freeland before.
O. And were OF the three arbtrators agreed upon
Tuesday night?
Mr. Beaoh-Who between?
Mr. Tracy-wel will fud Out-aiter find whether they
agreed upon will ask
Mr. Beach-Well, Sir, I object 10 the question
Mr. Tracy-What is the objection?
Mr. BeachThe objection s that Il does not call for an
agreement between the paes who parties to this action
Sr parties 10 that claim.
Mr. Tracy-I don't care; MI TtOn was present that i:
enough.
Mr. Fuerton-But Il is proper 10 ask II it was agreed
upon; tina: will judge Of when we hear what was said
Judge Neilson-Wen.
Mr. TracyweI the three names selected that night
Mr. Besch-Seleced where!
Nj Tracy-At this meeting Moultons house between Mr.
wnkeson Mr. Moulton Mr.. Tton and the witness A. Yes
Sir
Tracy-That lie the interview am inqurug Of and nc
ether Was the time Of the meeting OF the arbaors agreed
upon that night! A. think il was Sir.
@ Where you 70 meet! 4. AT the same place. We
Moutons study Sir and TO meet al the same
place
Mr. racyIti after o'clock your Honor and trusting that
the witness will be in the morning. propose that we
ad jeurn.
The Court the-eupon adjourned un; II O'Clock his mor