, 1875-06-15
BEECHER.
Some Stunning Developments
in the Scandal Case.
Tho Druggist Found Vino Sold
Beecher so Cents Worth
Of Prnssic Acid,
Likewise an Upholsterer Who Once
Saw Something Very
EQuivocal.
hr. Death Proceeds With his Argument
for tlla Plaintiff.
The Charge Of B'ackmail and Spells
Shown to Be Groundless.
Cutting A1lusions to tho Plym-
Outh Passion for Court.
Room Effect.
4 Thing Passing Comprehension: "The
Ways Of Minister with @
Maiden
4 Thing Passing Comprehension: 1.-THE
Ways Of q Minister with o
Maiden"

AAAAA~AA*
REACHs FOURTH DAY.
NEW EVIDENCE F0R TIE PROSECUTION.
Spteiat Dispatch to 7hs tAIedoo Tribune.
New loHK. June 14.--A great stir Was made tn
Court by tho oponiue scsuatks Of Ms. Beach in
rcferonco to tho publication In tho Herald Of new
evidence for piatuti1 discovered siocc tho
evidence was In. lie stated that In bis opinion
the evidence waa OF . character which called for
an application to the Court in tho mattcr. but
Sishad to conhult Judge Fullerton before scting
aud would do 10 during tho rcceBs. During the
reccBs all norts Of ruuoza wese aGoat as TO the
courao to 10 followed. Among oshors wcro hints
Of contempt proceedings. and OF possible re-
opening Of tho caHo. After tho toasaenbllng Of
tho Court nothing Was said bJ counsel IN Tho mat
ter mud atr. Dpach. wlen questioned, said TINT
thoy had resolved to do nothipg whatovcr with
regard to tho Btntement, leaving tho work Of to-
plying to dafoudanta couzel.
11r. Beach to-day entered upon tho presonta-
ton Of plaintiffs caHo In an argument llkoly to
lust two days or more. Ho deyoted most Of tho
day to ao analysis of thu characters engaged
In tho defoune, aomo Of which created great
Laughter and applause.
Tho oyations to Beach on ontoring md leaving
the Court continue.
ETs TIT Asseetattd Iress.l
TIE cnuaH NENEWED.
NEW Yonx, Juno 44.--Ihe crush for seats in
tho Bsoohtyn City court this mo1IinE was III
gteat as ever, aud every tacil OF stnnding-room
was occupied. Ii,on and ueechor woro curly IN
attendance. Aftor tho Court waB upourd ME.
Beach called attention to .publicationa \ the
uenspapora this morning. and said, befosu nak-
4nR ~ application or suggestion to tho Court, hc
wished TO consult with his association, and aftcr
rcccsa ho wouid tako whatever steps might bo
uceossaly In the mhttor.
Mr. Beach then eald his friend Judge Porter
had recoiycu l0tter from ". q. bartlett, in
Which tho latter disolaimea tho authorship Of
tho article quoted. In susntnang.up for tho
fact, ~ he had refosrcd to Mr. Uartett'B connco.
tlon with tho journal in which tho article hp-
pcarcd. Mr. Dcacl tuen said he had bad I cou-
versntion NTH Mr. Potter, md thero mas to dif-
feIonce betwcon luis brother and hiusclf.
Mr. Porter roBe, mud. after saying tho charge
o, Improper ADVANCES had bosn Expressly d.
uieti, obHorycd that ha might have used too
strong language III speaking OH sUb1uct 80 in-
portaut.
MI. nEAclI nIsuatEs.
Mr. Bench then resumed hlb hiidTchn to tho
Jury. Rolu1rinK to his remarks on 1ilulslhr, it.
roGerencc TO thu llov II. i. Southa1t, u Now
JerBoy, no said that rofatva OF the Iat.oy get'
tienAn Of high Htanaing. had inf formea him staat.
although I nervous a1lcton had induced Mr.
Buuthsrd to mako all e1cosB!se uBo Of stlnltlanss,
tho charge OF 1icentiouhuoas had neyor beEn
brought against him. He regretted his error,
and took pIoasuro in making the correction. ).
n!CllAKps' TESTIMONY.
Mr.. Beach then spoke Of Sir, Richards, tho
brother Of Mrs. Tllton. and said ho waB QUO ot
tho most respected 10y men,bern Of tho largest
Christian denomination Ia this cou ,try, no hatl
cume to this Court, which could not 10 resiBted,
and his domcaDor On tho stand showed him to be
-. 1n1f
cacy Of his position. tho counsel did not prcsa
him tor anything more tlan gouaral s1neenleut
OF hia observations, although, il 10 had boeu
driven to give "details. bin Testimony might have
been moro painful " Aiulsolf aud dutrlmeDtal to
the character OF hls slsscs. Mr. poach theu
road from III Article BY tho 1sov Dr. Curry, In tho
Christian Adu0cate, which Aots forth that cruel
and brutal attempta had bcon mado upon Mr.
Richards by tho dsfondants counsel. ....
TIE rnocTon AFrA1h.
Mr, Beach then defended A. u. Hsrtin. ono ot
the witnesses for the prosecution. anu then to.
ferred to tue aIl,son by thu counsel Tor lilo do.
fenso to tho courso Of Ar. MoA1ton III regard tt
Miss Proctor. 1Ie eaid shat aloulton. by advice
own upon that lady. but mcEely T. statement
Which lit. Deecher had made 70 him in regard &c
her. Tito statement was undoubtedly reliable
aud Moulton had paid counsel fcos III the matter
Ho then alluded to the difficulty Of Moulton't
| firm with tho dosetnalnnt iu connuction with
the revenue lams. Buch references to tho bust
/ noss Of tho wituoss woto unworthy, but the ayl
donco partly showcd-clouIly sll0wed-thAs nt
lisnouor attached either to MouIton or his asso
cAses.
b1r. Beach said Ill undno amoupt Of the atten
tipn OF tho Jury lihu bOen objected to relations O
| tho plaintiff With Mrs, Victoria Woodruff, j
was falsely pretended that Mn. woodhnl! hat
article u'wn the scandal. What was there whicl
| should induce tho jury to condemn Tllton fo
that association Il would 10 an outrage tt
coudomu this woman upon no bstter authority
| tlau tho toers and Sooin OF counsel
| THE CHARGE or ntAcX-hAlL.
Mr, Beach then spoke Of the astonishing doc
1aration madc BY Eynrts that *8,M0 Vi IL.
| e7,D0o pait BY Bowen Waa taken by Woodruff i
ltablpsol!. AAd been produced. aud Il wAa clearl,
shown that all Of tho 81, 900 was used by 1,ltoe
learned gentleman Mas q bold mlsstatonant
| tnAds, he supposed, uaconac ionsy. liz Mou!,
gladly allow counsel for defenBo to rafer to III,
o1ilsucn that could bo adducel for it, support
TIE bPotls DOCUMENT.
LIT. Beach said tho AttsmpkAal been mAdo /.
attaet Importance 10 = slip OF yellow. pape
which boFe s!so words. " spols from new fr!eudt
for tho enrcAmont Of old." lie ditl not think j
worth while to Indulge In tho ssria!urss to whicl
als. t..tr!dgo. the easAlor OF %oodEua l. lsob
illson, lRd la,l himself ot,en to by tbs Mpnnss it
| which tho slp Waa RbsttActol. lr, Tllsoa aut
Mr.. Woodruff lhl no recollection of tsls pApps
What did Tue paper meau, snywaY3 Tba 4, ,oo'
uot tho new friend Of 1YItou, neltl!er wore tl,i
Subscribers to the Goll<a AIe Mr. Iiltou'a OIL
fsiaudn, ~ compared with Dowen.
| ooAGEkcKa tits OWN ARGUMENT.
LIT, nsaGl s4ll h. lad now answered mum
ter Of suggestions made BY his saeuds Il. tho
| tasicW Of tho arguments for tho defense Aul
would how prucoel with hs own argumou,
| Tho Jury could rot hAyo failed to observe tut
peculiar circumstances under which the cast
| lid boo1 introduced to the1n, Theta Nsx aoI,1s