Richland beacon. [volume] (Rayville, La.) 1869-1890, 1875-04-03
Parish Court.

After two weeks session. this Court al
journcd last Saturday evening. During il
session the following cases, in addition Il
those already reported, were disposed Of:
ThoS J Marin, Il al, v Jas. VI. Berry,
Judgmen, for p'ainrift; Lamain Il EgGcston
Us L. II Kelly, Judgment for plaintiff for 81;
S. W. Greenwich v ]. d. ShipIey x ". F.
Austin, ju igmcnt uon-suiy-apPea.el by
plaintiff, Forbes * FdzIa;rick " L. ".
SCOT, judgment for plaintiff for ; 5, and aP-
peal taken 10y plaintiff; Rachel Lin>ey. " lie,
" Madison Winfield. husband, .ju5-men, for
plaintiff; Joseph Gr1>sbeck v ]. 4. LJdclI
sheriff judgment for plaintiff; A. B Cooper
vs. JAS A. Lrgri't, Jrigmcu, for plaintiff; II.
VI. Floyd " Wan. +. Oliver, Judgment for
plaintiff; Joseph Bernstcit'y> l.. {. Mcintosh,
Judgment for plaintiff; Joseph Bernstein '.
Jane VI. am j. Owen, Judgment for plain
iii: Joseph Bernstein y John VI Gwin. iuls-
ment for plaintiff: Lamkln & Egslcs,un v
Jas. F. Kelly judgment for plaintiff; Lamk.n
x Elgleston V F. 4 Kelly and husband.
Judgmcn, for plaintiff: Lamkin x Eg-lesron >,
". J. Goodwm. juigmcn; for plaintiff; East
land & Co. V o Edwards, judgment for
plaintiff Mary Travi., turk, V ~. T. ms
ley, administrator, judgment for defendant:
5. Girod, Te-,amenrary Executor. " J. +.
Marshall, judgment for plaintiff, AMI appeal
by plaintiff; Irwin F.. Lewis W Aaron Hay
good. Judgment for plaintiff; ;. Girod, Tesla
meniary Executor, vs Vim. +. Olive. and J.
V. Sinms, Judgment for plaintiff; jos p,ias
Evans " VI l.. Diulins, judgment for plant. e:
ii. p. Wells vs 5. +. Amery * John \ Hem
Ter, Judgment for plaintf; Duke X Sor,cr v
". X. Adams. Judgment tor plaintiff; Mary
A. Smith vs. John H. Bout; dismissed a. .
plaintiff cost; John J. Stewart V John s. .
SunmerlIn, judgmen, for plaintiff all appeal;
Joseph Bernstein vs. W. J. Cumpton, Judgment
for plaintiff; X. L. BIliug,ley x Co. vs. John .
Bishop Co, in liquidation Judgment for .
plaintiff; Grmsey X Co. v John Bishop & .
&C., Judgment for plaintiffs; r B. Whit .
more 4 Co. vs. John Bishop 4 Co., in liquida.
ton, judgment for plaintiff VIM. I. Raiif
VS. Spencer Evans, Judgment for plaintiff
Rose 4. Buie, wife vs. u Scriber. hu,banI'
judgment for plaintiff; J. 5. Summer!in Y,
Jas A. Read. Judgment for plaintiff: Il. H. /
Nelly VS. l.. V. Neues et a.. iudgmen, for
Pa n'iif, and appeal by plaintiff; r H. Kelly
vs. L. V. Neitles e. a.. judgment for plaintiff.
and appeal by plaintiff; Joseph Bernstein VS..
Enoct Thompson, judgment for plaintiff
Martha Kelly, wife, VS. Nathan Kelly. nus
band, judgment fui plaintiff; F. VI Bedsoe
vs. H. }. Willard and husband, Judgment for
defendants, aud appeal by plaintiff; W. c.
Christian vs. L. c. McInto,i,, judgment for
plaintiff; John \ Hemlrr IS B. NJ Scriber
Judgment for p'air'f; Mary Travis, Turk.
vs. W. L. lnsley. judgment for defendant, and
appeal by plaintiff; George Willard VS. heirs
OF Baird, judgment for pIaintiA; Maxwell &
Goodman vs. f. Las,er, jrlgment for plaintiffs;
Jane Robinson, wife, vs. Dick Robinson. has.
band, Judgment for plalntif; State Of Lonisi
ana VS. Thomas Jones, assault and battery
tried aud acquitted.