New-York tribune., 1875-02-06

~.
q Mr. Tlton when wife left house a. you have
stated did she leave the house ana what in H. dG he
take anything with her? A. don't that sre took any
thing with her, except my love and good will.
O. Very we'll And that has s,iI has shei A. cannot
for her Sir don't what mischief MIR Tracy has
made in The bnsness
HOW THE CORRESPONDENCE OF HUSBAND ASD
WIFE WAS PUBLISHED.
O. Now, Sir, there was a publication made of
selection from you and her letter; mean by selection that
correspondence that made by you,
through your prOcuremen' A. No, Sir IL neither made
by through my procurement; made somewhai
against my wish and Will.
q But pray make iti A. Who did what srf
2. That publication. A. The Chicago Tribune
q Were those letter. left the house when your wife
leftf A. Yes Sir
@ How did TIE Chicago Tr5un get those Ieersi
Through the advice and desire Of my friend and counsel
Judge Morris.
q All did he have the ansackng Of the whole OF hem' A.
think Sir he is too much Of a geniloman-
@ didn't ak about that don't know whether he had the
opportunity. A. What Co you by ransackinsi
@ The opportunity for examination.
Judge Nciison-Ie did he have the whole of them
did he have opportunity the whole Of 1cmi A
All letters found in the housef
@ Yes. A. lie did; believe he did
@ Was that by the advice OF COUNSEL
Mr. Fulcrton-One monenti One moment do not see
the pertinency Of these inquiries
hrs counsel
Mr. Fulrrton--Ohl that your question.
Mr. EyartsI did ask about the Counsel Tie threw that
The wnessDo yoa that Nj. Norris did that by tie
advice o, counselY
NJ Eysrts-No
The Winess-uc j. himself counsol'
Mr. Evar;s-I mean whether this giving Of = these papers
The Clio4qo Tribune, its representative, was by aiee
Of yoaI 2g1sel
Ar Dcchh does moi appear that Tie Chicago Tribune had
the letters 10 themslyts
NJ E,arts-Hc has just said they had the opportunity
The Wnes--Ah! YOU mistaken Mr. Eyars; the extracts
that were published communicated 10 the thl5D Irb
uHe those made by Tie al ice and ~ the sus-es
ton Of my counsel
G Very wells Iourlt that asked yon whether TIE Cht-
oq7o Tj1e had access and opportunity examine all those
rapers A. dI4nt understand yon pa. tie queetou 80
understand YOU ask whether Judge Morris had the rnsack
in, OF those papcr-
Mr.. Beach-TIat the question.
Mr EyarsNo; you a. Ia The question VII speak
Tor sf In Of my qUcsi iJas tie witness "a
whatever he then spoke Of it done by the Gdyce Of
his counsel Then I afterwards asked hm-or what IN
tended 10 asa hin was-whehe TIE CAago Tr5n< had the
opportunity 10 examine all me papers Now, II the VI"
uoss understood applying that question to judge Moh
judge Ncleou-Le l..e sorocraphor ad The question:
TIE TRmryE Stcno.-3pher read the quc-'ion
Judge Ne sou--Thr understood "A 10 Apply 70
| Judge Morris. ana nl. scif 20 un ersIo"t H.
Mr. E,.r,~- DIDN'T 20 understand and had s1ch in
cnon and therefore lI understand Why that answer
should be given
o Now then Won understood question 20 refer - judge
Morris and not preventative 81 TIE CIgo Ir'5m<F
A. Yes. s.r.
Mr. Fuucrton-It was TIE Chicago Tr55sme-ihe neu,er
gender
Nr Fvar,s-ru; It was the representative Of the paper
Mr. Eyar,s-Now any ion or opportunity 70 eZ
anime or know Of the ettes themselves given 70 Ihe Ceago
T,ij4ns representative, were ney selections or port oas
that furnished 20 a Yes or' ule representative oi
| that paper b.: see TIE original manuscript
q i.ou is +, you -ay that tncy nt published b. yonr
/ act OF procurement; a. w,J toll you s.E
! Mr Tuucr,oI--I don think Aat is proper.
Judge NcsonTnoy pu0. sled By as at and p-ocare
ment houc his COUNSEL M. Morris aud by ls advice.
Nj L,4It--l r-t 10 ass the witness shat h2 n ait
wh,r lc SAD :.ey pa. -h u rather against his ".
! TAe Wi.ueas-po vou wish me % auwet'
@ Yes ST. =. During the e4-y cons i;a.ons had with
M friend Judge ,Eis, PVT ul-o Bis hanIs ,he papers H.
rcaI them and >: Tc-c lc's ouch, o. be pH,neh'd or
al lest, liberal 4 cogous extracts from th.u" SAD: NO
,lgv are private let;,rs, aal I tlk tAae is al
inprop iety 10 Publishing th"l" lie sa'- on the
. contrary, the case Of such seriousness and
, aud had been g g 'reur 'cntcf that he thon.ht
iarce required ,y -.,.t ne r1'-nc- IT, ttcn srt,,si"l
taa, . o.. e pcraa-s would lead their e5 -. on, no,
here u Eryn in either local papers DI at come on
ta9tpcir r.4 Of t. t visit mad, 20 house By 40
lc.n Of 4Is LLtc,1o Tr1o.t; in l-e Morris mace h- a.
cuaniaucc cna icG TO this AGENT written c~iFa' =
g ul yoa 10 n "4r c,u in.c-,s sigh yo'r VIE md '''
her 4-,rt g. a.. a.v. A. did l1t g.; ny Ma "4s
nor then l. .r, ., iy hor-s; Size bad d.-er el ne
\ q v, know ,.. Nov. I'D whose handwriting were those
cx.r4c WI c4 y.. .c--@ 20 tc Lew-l ie!. as y'I A-'"
or hcl.ves A. in tle handwriting Of some stau'r"c ne
rrcr }chsd Eaa dozen IT, snryce az the tae don't
remember a. This aou.u, WHO 10 was .at mad the COPY
@ Ills 4o r. o .Ia.oi.-i l. -ra.4 l t--' rg.-'.on'
! A. Y,- e.r.
@ From gaoso d.ctatn ID he take them dowa' A No
/ b.t.'-.
| 9 You mean he copod them hmscf' A. Yes
O. IN sho--. .l' A. Ii.a' know hog tl.g we" copied
q solu..,.r be copied tucm from the paicrs2 a : les
O Len me c. yaur a c,lol th, la plt o The ,lzn ara
c,-f-oo M t. t-e aud read ,1andins witness ms o"
. i.sis aieL.ntI Afc. You have looked az VII as,
Won c.on Is,iu.- l.o.- tie 9sIcrl - t..i an eZ
trac; .n .e,tcr = .ourve given tcref A ld"nt Ano"
how rorr.I - is printed S-. bN' be- printed correctly
as...l from .1r s.,jr. statement, u is a. extract
/ Ar b. l..-t--i zee passage is ...,----
/ ~ f,..--or-'' o -loia .ut "-o' "a ii-'
7 Mt E,.. s-' .a gong ~ r--4 so passage 'o~ '.HL
Nj I.....- ..to5.c.t
Dr. t,.---.!c q 30 correctly prLed a. &c "''', " 'i
7 ha .l.,n'u. 20 i- correct
Mr raucr.o. Ba t docs no' follow ait ~on cen rr'i -
Sr E,ats-I p-po- 70 r,4d i out AM let -m sec u
} correct So,
re reon7a,t can be done and 1t can be corrected Il
/ not correct, printed
Mr. F..er.o4-8it The possibility OF correcini It does not
rnatc q disste az . Of the case la th. irst place
:re is The orna Of s pr somewhere anu II can Dc pro
/ Glc,d Gil. 10, copy ~
+ rer' Of ',s statement.
Nj H. tz-AaI be IS now on cross examination F' o' ny
b substantive proof is That this is tae statement
q Urr..-I DO not uuders, and you. The passage you
want nc % read vas no part Of statement bat Ill eA.-c'
from one of Mrs it.u's letters.
O Bl u j., IN y1gr statement. A. Y'u asked me 4 II was
p, II 10y statement sald Il correctly printed The
! sri.y nj letter :