The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-10-06

re ar trial ana disbursements and $40 costs Of motion
the default Is opened and set down for trial for
Monday the sth inst The Judgment is TO stand IN the
meantime as security.
Moses vs. Isidor-Motion granted Cause ordered
on Special Circuit calendar for October
The People, &c, VS. rweed.-fhe affidavit purporting
10 be made by Brub Bumncy on the 18th OF Septem-
Der Is not signed by the Atlanta
Babcock ". Hazard; Bernhard vs. Hazard-Motions
granted
Peters vs. Monoy-Motion for receiver granted
Receiver viii be appointed on settlement Of order.
MensOn vs. DECENTRALIZATION granted.
Knapp Va Leszysisky .-Mouon denied, with $40
costs
Gieve vs. Honeywell; Levy vs. Wolf; Mason VS. Fal-
Barstowvs Clark-Motion granted with leave TO
defendant to answer within five days upon payment Of
costs Of action and SO costs Of motion.
stephens vs. The Astoria and Hunters Point Railroad
company.-Hhere is proof Of the service Of the IN
Junction
De Wolf Va Marshall-Moton granted
Schmiu VS. Raeder.-hotion denied, with $40 COSTS
Matter Of Foster-The names Of the jurors are not
Annie r Doremus vs. Peter Doremus.-Report OF
referee confirmed and judgment OF divorce granted 70
plaintiff with custody OF child
Gibbs vs. Rooney-Rxplanation required
Mayer vs.. Ullman.-Fil up blank and have u TO
form TO rule 81
Heller VS. Levy; Matter OF neutrality-suspicious.
CauldwelI vs. Scranton tNc 2) Merchants National
Bank vs. Laori Macy vs. stroOGl; sealey vs.. Housh
jackson vs.. Grilin.-Order granted
By Judge Daniels
Amery David-The right Of the creditor to ex-
anime this debtor in the country where he has place
business general including the cases OF resldents
and nonresidents Of the country and The order was
properly made and the motion 10 set 1t aside denied
Sherwood vs. Bruce. Opinion.
BY Judge Donohue
Matter OF Taylor.-Opinion
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Van Worst
Putnam vs. Schch ct aL-Findngs OF fact and con-
illusions of law settled and signed.
Wauner Nostrand ct AL Stevens VS.. Smith ct al ;
Gowdy VS. Poullaine.-0rders settled.
By Chief Justice Mcneil
Nolan The New York New Haven and Hartford
Railroad Company.-Proposed case appeal settled
Kurnhedt VS.. Thrall ct a.-Findings settled
COMMON PI.EAs-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Loew.
Fountain VS.. Fuller-I think the motion should be
granted payment of the interest and interest upon
such interest together with the disbursements and
costs and $40 costs of this notion
Van Houten VS.. Van Houten.-l think the plaintiff
should pay the defendant So per week for alnony
and counsel tee of $3.50
MARINE CoURr-PART z.
By Judge Joachimsen.
Rosenthal vs. BerkourtZ Judgment for plaintiff,
$l53 10.
Moissen vs. Acknowledgment for plaintiff,
$2l9 90.
Gill VS. Murray-Judgment for plaintiff 1894 60
Merwin Oates-Nerdict for defendant
Anthony VS. Tyng-Verdlct for plaintiff 1857 II.
Lane Hutchings. -Verdict for plaintiff, S40S 90.
Crooks VS.. Sehmidt-Judgment for plaintiff, $3.50
Bruno Industrial Exhibition Company.-Judg-
ment for plaintiff, 1854.
Whitney Observation-Disclosures for plaintiff,
5000 81
Lewis VS. Marsh-Judgment for plaintiff, 1854 81
Heraghty O'Tooie-Verdict Tor defendant.