The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-02-12

81 am as certain as that the Day OF Judgment Is
coming.n
This was thought novel form OF expression
and disposcd.some people to sneer. Evarts thought
ofin slnuaiing doubt, and said that was q thing
OF the future, to which the witness replied. "The
great am Is always present." curious effect
was produced by this style Of address, delivered
IN deep, sepulchral tone, as II to brighten the
court room INTO propriety.
TILTON's CHuRCHooINo,
Mr.. Evarts 10 the Courp-we win have the
"true story here at two O'CLOCK, and until that
mltted.
Q. Do you remember, MIR. Tiltop. whether or no
you lelt OH going TO plymouth church-had lett on
or did leave or then going to Plymouth cnurch-as
early as the year 1902 a. No, sir: went occa.
O. Now, how often did you 60 IN 1861 A. |
9: Did You go more than twice in that whole
- q Did you 20 more than two or three timess A.
Oh yes. did, down to the spring OF 1870
z. You did e. occasionally III 1866 A. Yes, STR
and In 1867. 1865 and 1869.
- 9: Now. dia you 60 more than two or three times
say perhaps went eight or nine times; perhaps it
O. Now, in the year so7 did you go al ALL and II at
canhot say how MANY times.
q And IN the year 1868 what was your habit OF
attending that cnurcn ! A. think l went to
church ABOUT as other people do.
q. There Is great a ference as to the frequency
have your personal recollections A. NV recoec.
ton Is that went To Plymouth church with more
or less frequency when was IN town in all the
years up to 1870; you must remember that | was
IN the habit OF lecturng i've months in the year /;
then Plymouth churcn was closed during two
Q. We needn't argue ABOUT It; the fact want
70 know Is whether you went 10 1868 more than
went vita moro or less frequency up TO the year
Q. win you tell me how many times you went
A. Inn
@. And 50 IN the year 1859 did you then 70 more
than two or three times A. ininkI shail have
how many times.
THE wooDHULL's MENACE.
visits at Mrs. Woodhull's house, tSat Sou never
passed but one night there; now how late in the
saS mere e on other
all over the house once, in order that Mrs. Wood
null NIGH show tnat every room was empty and
cupled IN It, and that her ROOM her husba Id s
study aad room occupied oy Mr.: Andrews
cate; IN the early part or my acquaintance with
her; she waited me to 60 there to the house and
zee tnat tnere was notnng IN IT. 1t was as bare as
that was the parlor.
q. Did 1t continue to be in this cond.lon during
the whole period OF your visiting there? A. /
don't remember: never went upstairs but that
once.
understand you A. That Is all Anow about It,
yes SIR; she told me that her house had been
called house OF ill:repute, and she wanted me to
see thatit was totally unoccupted, ana there was
no article OF furniture in 1t from the top 10 bottom
only the room which sne ana her husband occu.
pied. ana the room MIR. Andrews occupied and
there was one which, think, her mother and ner
sister occupied; however, II was q great empty
Darten mousse; mat was one or the circumstances
that Impressed me with the IDEA that she was
traduceo woman.
Z. Wen, did you understand whether 1t had been
stripped by az execution or anything oil that kind
A. NJ, sir; simply understood that 1T was an un.
occupied nouse-that is to say, an unfinished
house.
z. And had always been sos A. never ask ed
any question aoout 1t; never thought on the sub.
ject ro'n that day 10 tins.
q. DO you mean to say that you don't know thai
1t MAS ever refurnIshede A. / don't know any.
thing about IT.; never heard ANYTHING ABOUT 1t;
never understood anything aboutit.
THE PAPERS IN TUE CASE.
3acon Is.e scw eaf,y "er me puolicatlon OF the
how cary aeer that aid any more papers or
copies OF papers which had been III Mr.. Moulton's
hands connected with the matter come into your
hands ? NY present impression Is that none OF
them came into my hands; That Is 10 say. when
alter the Bacon letter. then mad no access to the
papers tnen they were published in Mr.. beccners
have seen the papers since thi. suit has gone on.
O. Well, the question Mr., 1llGon, is this:-H0w
soon after the publication OF the Bacon letter did
either tne papers themselves that had been III Mr.
M0ulton's posscsslon, or copies OF them, winch
were not already IN your possession. come III o
your hands now. do You say they never dld A.
don't undel land your question, Mr.. Evarts.
q Now how soon after YOU published the Bacon
iettsr uid any papers that were not before That
time IN your hands, or any copies OF papers that
were not before that time IN your hands did the
papes thar were in Mr. Moulton's hands come
HOW TILroN MADE HIS STATEMENT
Wlness-l don't remember That any papers or
MOulon's hands at all; Mr.. Moulton publlsled 10
MIS- 0Tn statement tue documents when no had.
,ccs 20 rv COPIES came from Moutons A. reco
the sworn statement was prepared, and he de.
cline 10 let me have them.
q. nat you remember distinctlys A. Yes, sir;
hadtO make my statement upon the mea Ire ma.
terla3 had IN my SAFE.
u low, SIR, II you VIII refresh your recollection
by loklng at that last clause A. YES, SIR,
q low, Sir, look at that Will you, and tell me
wheIthe papers ana COPIES OF papers that you
therUeler TO came INTO your hands? A. viii you
ailowme 10 read this sentence I?
T. ertany.
Wl,ess (readng)-'T had With the origina,
oo:uients mere, Tor the most part In my possess
sIOn
Q. ow, before the papers you there refer to,
now ing had they oeen In possession? A. Why
ever luce they mad been written.
z. iad you not, when you were preparing your
stateaent lcr tne committee, received from MIR.
Mouon any papers or copies OF papers wnlcn un
TO int time you mad not Ia your possession A.
No, s.; Mr. MouitOn-
T. iery well, that Is all.
Wl1ess (cOntlnulng)--Mr. MoultOn would not
let ~ nave them, tnat is
z. Veii the lacC Is That between the time OF the
publ'atlon OF the Bacon letter and the time YOU
madyOnr sworn statement Jnag you did not re.
cclVtuuy vi Tue uOcuuentSf A. No, Sir Mr..
Eou3n was very angry about 1t. and reused,
Tnt usual recess until two o'clock was then
takei
AFTER RECESS.
Thwitness was on exhibition in the chair for a
quarr OF an hour before the proceedings were re.
sumo Mr. Evarts was the cause OF the delay. He
was sting his ammunition together and it finally
appered 10 the shape OF "the True Statement
wnic was read piecemeal to profoundly at
tente audience.
TILTON's TRUE STORY.
Thwitness SAID, In reply TO Mr.. Evarts-l have
proceed papers in reference TO tue ''rrue StOry;n
they're not parts OF the DRAFT; they are part OF
the py; there are some blanks in them. blanks
not fed up In wnat have called the complete
copy the complete" copy mad never been
aDsotely completed; these are all rnat I have
beenble to find, all that know OF being now in
OF Unrest that know OF.
T. r. Tilton, please listen to what shall now
reado u, and say whether you recognize IL as the
commencement OF TINS "lrue Story" (Readlng) =
,,Onday last month, when was in northern New
Hamnlre scanaalous publication burst lik, a cloud
over home In Brooklyn. and sned a sudden shadow