New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1875-02-11

No. 5,C4. State of Louisiana ex rel. Mrs. ".
Noble va. Charles Clinton,
sheriff. -
No $3.50. Mrs. J. Armstrong vs.. estate of Euger
No 1862. Emily J. Robertson VS.. c. S. sauvine
ct al
REHEARryGs REFUSED.
No. 3 3so O. K Cunning ". John Coleman ct a.
no. .8Si. Steamboat Carrie Owen and owners v:
Bohn Flnrig ct al.
70 363i. Henry Renters vs.. Valentine st. Cerar
No. s6if. Mrs. Widow L. ChaIbouet VS.. L. Dapas
No. 1867. James j. O'Hara w. Henry Blood.
NO 1886. n. Tongue Louisiana Levee Com
No. 3547. }. H. Louise skinner Va. William c
Sibley.
No. 1886. J. E. Prudhomme vs. O. b. blanche ct al
No. 53g1. W. B. Scott Il Co. Vs. A. b. See,e.
No. 1914 Henry I. Gotham vs. g. Il. Smith Co.
70. 46i6 Citzens Bank OF Louisiana ct al. VS.
No. 5l53 Peter Gassen Vs. Luke Beebe
No. 1902 state of Louisiana ex rel W. W. Howe
gs- Charles Clinton.
40. $3.50 Charles Diamond VS.. Robert z. Dia
mond
No. s:67 Joseph vigo We. A. E. Carton, etc.
NO. ash3 r. Dupierris We. J. W. Haiiisey, L. Ben
No. 54c5. 4. a. Desonde VS.. State National Bank
80. !403. P. Woodbridge VS.. X. MOnteuse.
No. $3.50. Succession of s. Marx.
Superior District Court.
Louisiana National Bank vs. z. Pilsburv ct al-.Ths
supplemental and amended petition of John Klein
represents that all of the Metropolitan Police war.
rants, checks and orders held by him as SET forth
in his original petition of PREVENTION herein filed
were drawn for salaries and expenses OF the Me-
tropoiitan Police Board for the year commencing
October l, 1872 and ending October l. 1873 and for
the last three months of the year 1873. He furthe
q. 1869, and by act No. ii, approved February a6
1870. it is provided that the aggregate amount of
metropolitan Police warrants, orders and checks
i appOrtlOhInent made by the Metropolitan
Police Board for that year. and the city Of New
orleans is thereby prohibited from paying or
ticking In payment of either licenses or taxes an
amount Of such warrants orders and checks ex.
ceeding the superintendent made for the current
year in which SAID warrants, orders and checks
we're drawn. He therefore charges that under
these provisions of the law If it shall turn out on
the trial OF this cause that the city of New Orleans
mas overpaid her proportion pro rata share of
such warrants orders and checks for any year or
tober 1872 she has done 80 In violation Of law.
ana at her own peril, and that by so doing the
rights Of your petitioner as holder and owner Of
such warrants. orders and checks drawn subse.
quently thereto can not be in any manner effected
Or impaired thereby. He further represents
politan Police Board against the city of New
orieans tor the year commencing October I. 1872
commencing October |, 1873, ct which time said |
board ceased drawing warrants. orders or checks,
except against cash .ctuay in the hands Of the
fncai Agent. have not been Overpaid by the city.
but that, on the contrary there remains deficit
due by her for that period of over 100000.
evitable consequences of the issuance and main. |
tenance Of the witt Of injunction herein will be to
impair the value of all the Metropolitan Police
warrants, orders and checks held and owned by |
MIN, as set forth in his original petition to at
ieast nifty cente on the dollar; whereas. if the Ad
i1e allowed to receive them in payment of licenses
for the year 1875, they would command az least
ninety cents on the dollar He prays leave to file
TINS his amended and supplemental petition of in.
prevention. and that it Be taken as part of the
original petition for citation, therein prayed,
tn la ad
A. Schnltze vs. London and Lancashire Fire In.
surance Company of Liverpool, EnSland.-Plaintf
pettlOns for judgment on fire insurance policy of
Hlaz7 "a and cost Of protest and suit.
ANSWER AND RKCONvKNTIoy
City OF New Orleans VI. J. X. Fitzgerald ct al
fitzgerald, an assessor and collector of water
rents with sureties in this suit collected
ana retained sums In payment of salary, etc. fail.
ing 10 obtain. after demand, settlements from the
ty: City objects to his right to make this OBJECT.
ne prays that the claim Of plaintiff for $500 80 |
with interest be compensated with @ like amount
winch the city owes him; and IN recOnvention |
after due proceeding he have Judgment for the !
balance OF claim due sl3s 66. and general relief.
Sixth District Court.
An additional panel Of forty.eight jurors was
returned to this court to-day.
Fifth District Court.
CURATOR APPOINTED.
Ernest Krutschnidt was appointed curator ad |
n the suit OF Moore, Janney Hyams vs. the same |
JUDGMENT.
H. Berwin Vs. c. Mehle Co. and Cohn & Selg.
man et a.-Judgment against julius LibeImann, |
garnishee. or S3524 Is, taken pro confess0. /