The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-06-25
THE COURTS.
Suit for Tom Fields Salary as
Corporation Attorney.
Central Branch, Union Pa
cific Railroad.
AN OLD ARMORY SUIT.

Yesterday Arson Morey, . cigar manufacturer,
noing business At Pougnheepsie, was charged be-
fore Commissioner Shields with having removed
rom his factory $500 cigars without the same
being stamped. he was held in ST.. 900 BAH for ex-
animation.
Charles Reilly No. 900 Front street. and owen
D'Rourke, Grand street. were neld yesterday BIZ
Commissioner Shields 10 await the action or the
Grand Jury on charges OF selling liquor by retail
without paying the special tax required by law.
They gave bail TO appear when called on to answer
the accusation.
In the United States Circuit Court yesterday
Judge Benedict resumed the trial OF criminal
causes. Rockwell Tyler, deputy collector OF In
ternal revenue, has been indicted ior emDezzling
ABOUT $500 OF public money and for failing to ur-
nlsn his accounts monthly. DEFENDANTS counsel
made motion TO quasn the indictment. counsel
Tor tho government opposed after which the
Court took the papers ana reserved its decision.
The trial or Edward Mclaughlin, IN the Court OF
Oyer and Termner before Judge Brady, for the
alleged murder or James Stewart, the facts OF
wnicn have already been published In the HERALD,
was resumed yesterday. After the conclusion OF
the TESTIMONY which occupied but q snort time,
Mr. Charles w. Brooke summed up in lengthy
and able argument for the prisoner. He was ol-
lowed py District Attorney Phelps, succeeding
which Judge Brady charged the jury, the charge,
rs usual being clear, succnct and impartial
In the suit OF John b. Greene against the city to
recover for laying Croton mains in Madison ave.
nue. and other uptown streets judgment was yes
terday formally entered ana the costs taxed. The
latter were fixed at $50 25 This makes the en-
tire judgment about $1,000.
Judge Donohue, in Supreme Court, Special Term,
yesterday granted an Injunction against the Sher-
III, restraining him from seliing the household fur
niture or Mrs. Waite willard. The property had
been seized by the creditors OF her late husband.
and it was shown that the ownership was vested
exclusively In her, and hence the Injunction.
Wen Brothers q Dreylus, who caused the ar
rest OF their defauting bookKeeper, wish 1t to be
distinctly understood that they do not intend to
abandon the prosecution. On the contrary, they
are determined that the law shall take Its course
and have peremptorlly refused to compromise the
case, as they are naturally unwilling to compound
felony.
The suit brought by Edward A. Darragh against
Joseph McKim TO recover S25, 900 damages for
SANDER In stating that plaintiff set IRE his no
tel at Far Rockaway, the particulars or which have
been published In the HERALD, was concluded
yesterday before Judge Freedman, OF the SUI
perior Court, and resulted in verdict for $50 for
plaintiff.
notice OF lis pendens was filed yesterday in the
County ClerK's ONCE In the foreclosure suits
brought by the Farmers Loan and Trust Com.
pany against the Erie Railway Company. The
particulars ofthese suits nave already been fully
published-in the HERALD. and 1t Is therefore I'M
necessary to recapltulate them. The notice Is
In the ordinary form, describing in general terms
the properly Of the Erie Railway Company.
Following the insolvency or the Market Savings
Bank John H. PlaIt. assignee OF the creditors,
brought suit against James Van Name, the former
president OF the bank 10 recover moneys which
II was alleged he had taken from the iunds or the
bank and appropriated TO his own use. The suit
same 10 trial yesterday before Judge Van Worst.
holding supreme Court Circuit, Part 3. The evi.
dence showed that the moneys alleged to have
been thus appropriated we're withdrawn by
checks given BY Van Name the PARK Bank, IN
which the Market Bank kept It's deposits, and
passed TO Wall street brokers, who placed them
70 the personal credit or Van Name. to be In
vested in stock speculauons. The trial termi.
mated with verdict OF s6e,10 50 In favor OF the
plaintiff.