New-York tribune., 1875-03-11


from hr Beeche present mOment perhaps not quite "
M Eh.
@ Twenty twenty five eetf A. Well really don't eco-
ct the size Of the Mr. Fullerton bat whatever the sze
OF the Mr. Beccher and Mr. Mouton were at one ex
treme and the other Ii ordinary Office In Cosn
ties Slip.
@ Did you and Mr. Beecher Mr. Mouton's Office to-
getheri Mr. Bechcr Mr. Mouton and myself left the ONCE
together.
Q And where did You goi A. went over Fulton Ferry,
and they went of with the expressed intention OF going over
Wal-st Ferry
Q No matter They went in another drectionf A. Yes,
| Sir.
Separate from your A. Yes, Sir They went together,
| and went over Fulton Ferry and went home
Mr. Evars-IIe said he went Fulton Ferry ana they
went OF with the expressed intention Of going over Wa
| Ferry
The WitnesI said: II am going over Fulton Ferry ana
they said they would go Walst Fery was In their
| way, and Fulton Ferry in mine.
@ You were waiting get something to publish in The Ed9
that day. A. No. Sir not waiting to get something 10
| publish In The Edgle that day
q Well come other dayf A. Well, was waiting for what
ever turned up. lIaughter1
Ana nothing turned that you could publish believer
We' nothing turned up that published ever was
| published by my procurement
| @ Howl A. Nothing was pobished by any act Of
mine
understand that you OF Mr. Beechers visiting
Mr.. Kinsea any what you staedr A.
| ! do not.
@ Have you him the office except this 18th
| OF October, II that the datei A. never have.
q What paper this letter Of Mr. Bowens, OF January
let, lS7l published in frss A. 1t published in paper
which has since gone way Of majority Of papers, and
dead, called The SA,idy Press.
| z. Published in The Sunday Pe%' A. Yes Sir.
q paper known then a. The Sunday ResP A. Yes Sir
Had you any connection with that paper? A. Not the
| slightest
And this publication in that paper not through your
connvance wayi A. Not the slightest degree was
as much surprised at it as any gentleman could be.
And you published III the paper that connected
with after this publication in the other paper and in
quence OF that! A. No. Sir else did The paper
published it, and did not II not in my department
@ AT all events it published in the paper with which
you were conneced3 A. Yes Sir published in The Eagle
| to the extent have testified o.
q Aud after the publication in The Sunday Fresy A. Yes,
| Sir.
| Q. 1t had become public them A. Yes, Sir.
| Q. Public property A. Yes, Sir.
Q. How long after the interview which you had with
Mr. Tton and after you procured copy through Mr. liar
man. Of that letter. A. Well have been here in Court
have become aware by the evidence that tue date OF The
Sunday Pres publication about the Goth of April in 1873;
and stated yesterday that the date Of communication with
Mr. Tton the day after Woodruff Rooinsons fire, which
would make November l9th s72 mrst have been from
| November to April, little over half year.
| Q. Little Elk monthsi A. Yes, Sir
| hr Bclch-A little less than six months.
| Mr. Eyarts-A little less than six months.
M fulerton-Noyember, December January, February,
March, Aplt little 1t is matter OF arithmetic.
The Wtncss-Ye-, Sir; it is matter Of arithmetic. The
almanac Will show.
| Mr. Tracy-Just five months
Mr. Beach-Wcl very simple arithmetic will chow It.
| Mr. Eyarts-Of course.
@ know how came to be Published in this Sun
day Press understand your A. do know how it became
| published in THE Smdqy Pt,ss.
| Nh Joy
April: A. heard it said while sitting in the Court
1t the Goth Of Apr 1t Sunday in April, if that
on aEh.
| Mr. Fuleron-lt lacks eight days, that Is all.
| REDIRECT EXAMINATION OF MR. McKELwAY.
Mr.. Tracy-Who was the editor of The Sunday
Press time Of publisaoni A. Mr. James McDer
mott
@ Was he also empoy6 Of The Eagle at the tmef
| A. | think not.
Q Had he not bcen' A. do remember that he
| had been at that period.
O IL he now? A. Not in my judgment think that when
| Mr McDermott-
q. Has he never been connected with The E4glF
| Mr. Morris-We object. wha, has that to do with III
The Witness-I thnk-
Mr. Morris-Onc moment. We object
| The witness-I beg your pardon. Mr. Morris.
Mr. TracyWc desire to follow up by showing he had been
| connected with The Ed9le.
Mr. Fullerton Objected to immaerial.
Judge Nclson-I don't how it is material.
Mr. Tray-t FOR the purpose OF showing how this publica
| On came to be made it is a fact.
Mr. MorrsThe says that time he had not been
connected with Ih1 Eagie.
Mr.. TracyWe may refresh his memory II We are permitted
to ask question or two
| Mr. Bcach-Of what consequence is IN
Judge Neilson-Not the slightest.
Mr. my learned friends admit he was connected
with Tie EgP Then will determine whether ID material
or not fmy learned friends admit he connected with The
Eqglt. very well.
Mr. Fullerton-we don't adml, it. when the evidence is to
the contrary.
Mr. Eyars-Then will 90 and prove IT, il It is subject
Of proof
Alr Beach-Ot conr.c you will, but we object
Mr. Hyars-The 'act that gays that he not
connected with The E certain time does prevent
from Offering prove fact and through this witness,
iha; he
Judge Nci.on-of what avail viii bo' Yon won't be able
10 Prove what McDcmou did 1t is WIKI third person.
NJ Tacy-Supose could show McDermoit got his copy
from tis copy tlk in Shorthand by McKelwayf
Mr.. Mor-,-Wcu wnal Of that.
judge Nc,l-o don't how that is material; don't see
hos you could show that
Nj Eyar,s-Wc mi.lt SHOW by Mr. McDermot.
Judge Nc,n yon could how that yon co1h show any
.hne else NJ McDcrmo ever did in hi- lie. don't think
j. material.
TIE would be- vc-y LARGE volume that won'd.
MI Eyarts Well vii. take orr exception. ITO Mr..
Trcv Ila- he connected with Te Eays at any
,ie November ls'h is52 and the present ime
Mr. Tr-y-Bo;wccn November ls5t aai the present time
las Nr Ncpcrmott been connected with The EIGsF
=. 10" N,ii-on-The pre-eit time
"- -,.cis Yes. 81; tn. Is our question
Mf. Fli.t.ton-Objocted to.
Mr. Bcach-Thai fals within yOur llonos ruling bringing
up 20 tine po ieut time. We object to it ~ imma,eria
Iud.c Ncl-on You ak him whether he was connected
WIKI HE fo1h between time Mr. McKclwAy got this
per and the time il was published in TIE Satday Fr(ss
Nr Tracy-rhat j. tne question diI ak originally.
Mr Bcach-Th1' he answered.
judge Nelson To the witness Had he during that lapse