davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice TO NONRESIDENT.


Whereas, n certain precept has been duly is.
sued 10 me by the Mayor Of the city OF Indian
.apolis under the corporate seal OF said city
dated October Is, 1875 showing that there is
due the following named contractor the amount
hereinafter specified for street I'm OroYement in
the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indi-
ana #le .r.
Due ID. Root & Co., for erecting lamp-posts,
lamps and fixtures on Elm street between Cedar
and Dillon streets, from r. IL. Brtdgeford, the
sum of three dollars and eighiy-two cents
(SS S2), amount of assessment charged against
lot No. two hundred and niRety-nine (299) in
Fletcher ct al. subdivision OF outlOt No. ninety
seven (g0 IN the city OF indianapolis, Marion
county, Indiana. t-L
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within (2O) days after the publica-
Non for, three weeks, OF this notice, the amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel of land Is paid. / will proceed to collect
the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said
lot or parcel OF land, or so much thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all
costs that may accrue.-sszsA -
HENRY w. TUTFWILER.
City Treasurer.
Indianapolis, Ind, November 4, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
HENRY W. TUTEWILER-
Notice to NONRESIDENT.

Whereas, a certain precept has been duly is
sued TO me by the Mayor of the city of Indiana
polls, under the corpora seal of said city, dated
October 2Sth, 1875, showing that there is due the
following named contractor the amount herein
after specified for street Improvement the city
OF indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Due ID. Root q Co., for erecting lamp-posts,
lamps and fixtures on Prospect street between
Dillon and Reid streets. from Mary z. Heron
the sum of four dollars and forty-three cents
ga 49,, amount OF assessment charged against
lot No. two hundred and forty-nine (249l in
Fletcher's Woodlawn addition TO the city OF
indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that
unless within coy days after the publication, for
three weeks, OF this notice the amount assessed
against the above described lot or parcel of
land is paid, will proceed to collect the amount
so assessed by levy and sale of said lot parcel
of land or so much thereof as may be necessary
to satisfy the above claim, and all costs that
may accrue
HENRY w. TUTEWILER,
City Treasurer.
indianapolis, Ind, Nov. 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to NONRESIDENT.

Whereas, A certain precept has been duly
issued to me by the Mayor of the city of In
dianapols, under the corporate seal of said city,
dated October 2oth, 1875, showing that there Is
hereinafter specified for street improvement in
the city of Indianapolis Marion county, In
diana.
Due ID. Root & Co., for erecting lsmp-posts,
lamps and fixtures on Elm street, between
Cedar and Dillon streets, from William Dunlop,
the sum OF three dollars and eight-two cents
(S3 S2), amount of assessment charged against
lot No. two hundred and eighty-nine (2e9) in
Fletcher ct al. subdivision OF outlot No. ninety
eight (95l in the city of indianapolis, Marion
county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that
unless within q days after the publication, for
three weeks of this notice the amount so assessed
against the above described lot or parcel of land
is paid, will proceed to collect the amount so
assessed by levy and sale of said lot parcel of
land, or so much thereof as may be necessary to
satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may
accrue.
HENRY w TUTEWILER,
City Treasurer.
Indianapolis, Ind. November 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to Nonresident.

Whereas, certain precept has been duly Is
sued to me by the Mayor OF the city OF Indiana
polls under the corporate seal of said city, dated
October 18th, 1875 showing that there is due the
following named contractor the amount here
matter specified for street improvement In the
city OF Indianapolis. Marion county, Indiana.
Due d. Root 4 Co, for erecting lamp posts,
lamps and fixtures on Bradshaw street be-
tween Virginia avenue and Sullivan street, from
Dorr Russell, the sum of three dollars and twenty
four and Seven-eighteenths cents, (S3 "A T-l6),
amount of asse ssment charged against lot No.
fOrty-six (46) in Bradshaw and Holmes subdl-
vision OF outlot No. one hundred (l0O In the city
of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within COY days after the publica-
tion, for three weeks, of this notice the amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel of land Is paid, | will proceed TO collect
lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all
costs that may accrue.
HENRY W. TUTEWILER.
City:Treasurer.
Indianapolis, Ind. Nov 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to Nonresident.

Whereas, a certain precept has been duly is
sued 10 me by the Mayor of the city of Indiana
polls under the corporate seal OF said city, da ed
October Is h, 1870, showing that there is due the
following named contractor the amount herein
after specified for street Improvement in the city
OF Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana
Due ID. Root & Co., for erecting lamp-posts
lamps and fixtures on Bradshaw street between
Virginia avenue and Sullivan street. from Dorr
Russell, the sum of three dollars and twenty
four and seven-eighteenths cents [s3 "a 7-lSl,
amount OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT against lot No.
twenty-six l26l in Bradshaw and Holmes subdi-
vision of outlet No. one hundred l00l in the city
OF indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified that
unless within l20I days after the publication, for
three weeks of this notice the amount so assessed
against the aOove described lot or parcel of land
is paid will proceed to collect the amount so
land. or so much thereof as may be necessary to
satisfy the above claim, and all costs that may
accrue.
HENRY w TUTEwILER
City Treasurer.
Indianapolis, Ind, Nov. 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice TO Nonresident.

Whereas. acertain precept has been duly Is.
sued TO me by the Mayor of the city OF Indian
apohs under the pOrate seal of said city ted
October 18th, 1870, showing that there Is due the
following named contractor the amount herein
after specined for street improvement in the city
OF indianapolis. Marion county, Indiana.
Due d. Root 81 Co, for erecting laEnp-posts,
lamps and fixtures on Bradshaw street between
Virginia avenue and Sullivan street, from Dorr
Russell, the sum of three dollars ana twenty.
four and seven eighteenths cents [S3 "A 7-1sl,
amount OF assessment charged against lot NO.
forty three 1881 in Bradshaw and Holmes subdi-
vision of outioJ No. one hundred lIO0l in the
city OF indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendants hereby notified that
unless within l2Ol days after the publica ton for
three weeks, of this notice the amount so as.
sessed against the above described lot or parcel
OF land Is paid, L will proceed to collect the
amount so assessed by levy and sale of said lot
or parcel of1and, or so much thereof as may be
necessary TO satisfy the above claim, and al
Costs that may accrue.
HENRY w. TUTEwILER.
City Treasurer.
indianapolis, Ind. Nov. 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to NONRESIDENT.

Whereas, a certain precept has been duly
issued tonne by the Mayor of the City of Indian
apolis, under the corporate seal OF said city,
dated October 2sth, 1875. showing that there is
due the following named contractor the amount
hereinafter specified for street. improvement in
the City of Indianapolis, Marion county, In
diana:
EDue ID. Root & Co., for erecting lamp-posts,
lamps and fixtures. on Bradshaw street, be-
tween Virginia avenue and Sullivan street,
from Dorr Russell, the sum of three dollars and
twenty-four and seven-eighteen cents (S3 "a 7-lS)
amount of assessment charged against lot No.
twenty EIGHT (2S) in Bradshaw & Holmes SUBJ
division of out lot No. one hundred (l60) in the
city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within COY days after the publica-
ton, for three weeks, of this NOTICE, the amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel is paid, l will proceed to collect the
amount so assessed by levy and sale OF said
lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all
costs that may accrue.s
HENRY w. TUTEWILER,
lCity Treasurer.
indianapolis Ind, November 4, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to NONRESIDENT.

Whereas. n certain prscept has been duly is
sued 10 me by the Mayor OF the city of Indian
apolis, under the corporate seal Of said city.
dated October 18th, 1875, showing that there is
due the following named contractor the amount
hereinafter specified for street improvement in
the city Of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indi-
ana.
Due ID. Root & Co., for erecting lamp-posts,
lamps and MIXTURES on Dougherty street between
Virginia avenue and East street, from Rosa
Zehe, the sum of four dollars and twenty cents
ga 10y, amount OF assessment charged against
lot No. one hundred aud twenty-three (l23) in
nine (9Jl in the city of Indianapolis, Marion
county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within (q days after the publica-
ton for three weeks of this notice tLe amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel of land is paid, Will proceed to collect
the amount so assessed by levy and sale OF said
lot or parcel o. land, or so much thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all
coats that may accrue.
HENRY w. TUTEWILER,
City Treasurer.
indianapolis iInd. November 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to NONRESIDENT.

Whereas, a certain precspt has been duly
issued to me by the Mayor of the city of Indian
apoliS, under the corporate seal of said city, da
ted October 18th, 1875. showing that there is
due the following named contractor the amount
hereinafter specified for street Improvement in
the city of indianapolis, Marion county, In
diana.
Due ID. Root & Co, for erecting lamp-posts,
lamps and fixtures on Tinker or Seventh street
b stween Delaware street and Columbia avenue,
from Ezra :. Pabody, the sum of nineteen dol
lars and seventy eight cents (si9 7S), amount OF
assessment charged against lot No. one hundred
and thirty-seven (l37l in Allen and Roots adj
dition to the city of indianapolis, Marion
county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within COY days after The pHblica-
tioO for three weeks of this notice the amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel of land is paid, will proceed to collect
the amount so assessed by levy and sale OF said
lot or parcel of land, or so much thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all
costs that may accrue.
HENRY w. TUTEWILER,
City Treasurer.
indianapolis, Ind November 4th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to Nom PRESIDENT.

Whereas, a certain precept has been duly is
sued 10 me by the Mayor of the city Of Indian
apOlis. under the corporate seal of said city,
dated October 2Sth, 1879, showing that there is
due the following named contractor the amount
hereinafter specified for street Improvement in
the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, Indi-
ana.
Due ID. Root q Co, for erecting lamp-posts,
lamps and fixtures on Dougherty street between
Virginia avenue and East street, from George
w. Bender. the sum of four dollars and twenty
cents ga 2O), amount of assessment charged
against lot No. one hundred and eighteen QlS)
In Dougherty's subdivision Of outlot No. ninety
nine (s9) in the city OF indianapolis, Marion
county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within COY DAYS after the publica-
ton for three weeks of this notice the amount
assessed against the above described lot or
parcel Of land is paid. will proceed to collect
the amount so assessed by levy and sale of said
lot or parcel ofland, or so mucn thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim, and all
costs that may accrue.
:HENRY w. TUTEwILER,
Cty:Treasurer.
indianapolis. Ind, November 4th. 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to Nonresident.

Whereas, certain precept has been duly Is
sued to me by the mayor of the city OF Indiana
polls under the corporate seal of said city, dated
October 18th, 1875, showing that there is due the
following named contractor the amount herein
after specified for street improvement in the
city of indianapolis, Marion county, Indiana.
Due ID. Root & Co. for erecting lamp-posts
lamps and fixtures, Dougherty street, be-
tween Virginia avenue and East street, from
Lewis Lamponia, the sum of four dollars and
twenty cents, 90 20l, amount of assessment
charged against lot No. one hundred ana forty
nine, (l49), in Dougherty's subdivision of outiot
No. ninety nine, 1881, in the City of Indianapo-
lis, Marion county, Indiana.
Now, the said defendant is hereby notified
that unless within COY days after'the publlca-
ton, for three weeks, of this notice the amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel of land Is paid, will proceed TO collect
the amount so assessed by levy and sale OF said
lot parcel of land, or so much thereof as may
be necessary to satisfy the above claim. and all
costs that may accrue.
HENRY w. TUTEWILER,
City Treasurer.
indianapolis, Ind, Nov. 9Th, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

Due ID. Root q Co., sr erecting 1amp-posts.
lamps and fixtures on Prospect street between
Dillon and Reid streets. from Albert Dutton, the
sum of six dollars and ninety-seven and half
cents Cs6 s71zl, amount OF assessment charged
against lot No. six <6) in square No. ave l5)
southeast addition 10 the city Of Indianapolis,
Marion county, Indiana.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

Whereas, a certain precept has been duly Is.
sued TO me by the Mayor of the city of Indian
apolis, under the corporate seal OF said city.
dated October 18th, 1875, showing that there is
due the following named contractor. the amount
hereinafter specified for street Improvement in
ana.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

Now, the said defendant Is hereby notified
ton for three weeks of this notice the amount
so assessed against the above described lot or
parcel of land Is paid I will proceed to collect
the amount so assessed by levy and sale OF said
los or parcel of land, or 50 much thereof as NAV
be necessary to satisfy the ABOVE claim, and all
costs that may accrue.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
Notice to Nonresident.

Indianapolis, Ind, Nov. 4th. 1878.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

HENRY w, TUTEwILER.
City Treasurer.
Ind, November 4, 1870.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

CHERIFF'S SALE.-By virtue of a fee
- bill TO me directed, from the Clerk OF tho
Supreme Court of Indiana, will expose at pub
lie sale, to the highest bidder, on
SATURDAY; the 9th day of November,
AID. 1875,
between the hours of 10 o'clock A. N. and 4
O'Clock P. NJ, of said day, at the door OF the
Court House of Marion county, Indiana, the
rents and profits for a term not exceeding seven
years, of the following real estate, to-wit.
Part of lots number two, 2, and three, g. in
block numbered seventeen, IL, in brakes adj
dition to the city OF Indianapolis, commencing
at point ninety-one, 81, feet and six, 6, inches
from the southwest corner of Fifth, 5th, and
Mississippi streets: thence west one hundred
and twenty, 100, feet TO an alley: thence south
ninetyone, 81, feet and six, g. inches on the line
of said alley: thence east one hundred and
twenty, 100, feet to Mississippi street thence
north to the place Of beginning, in Marion
county, Indiana.
And on failure to realize the full amount OF
Judgment, interest and costs, will, at the sam g
time and place, expose at public sole the fee
simple of said real estate.
Taken as the property of Caroline Bruner at
the suit of Julia Brennan.
Said sale will be made without any relief
whatever from valuation or appraisement laws
ALBERT REISSNER,
Sheriff of Marion county.
November 3, A. ID. 1875. nov4-3t
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

Indianapolis. Ind, November 4th, 1876.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
THE NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.. THURSDAY O.


CHERTFF's SALE.--By virtue OF a certified
- copy OF siecree 10 me directed
from the clerk OF the Superior Court OF
Marion county,, Indiana, In cause-Num-
Der 1896, in which Isaac Boone, Henry
Holderman and levi Gresh are plaintiffs,
and John A. Cassidy and Mary f. Cassidy. his
wife, James K. Downey and Mary j. Down ey,
his wife, and others. are defendants, requiring
me 10 make the sum of eighteen thousand and
twenty-three dollars and fourteen cents, with
interest nom the rendition Of said decree and
costs, will expose at public sale, to the highest
bidder, on
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

October n, A. ID. 1875.
W. X. STOKES, Atty. for PHI
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

G. HERIFF'S SALE.-By virtue OF an ex-
y ecution to me directed, from the clerk of
the Superior Court of Marion county, Indi-
bidder, on
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18

Indianapolis, Ind, November 4, 1875.
The Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1868-1895, 1875-11-18
SATURDAY, the 9th day of November
1875,

between the hours of 10 o'clock A. NJ. and 4
o'clock N of said day, at the door of the Court
House OF Marion county, Indiana. the rents and
profits for term not exceeding seven years, OF
the following real estate situate and lying and
being in said Marion county ana state of Ia
diana, to-wit:
The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1875-11-03
Hartrauft by q, 900 majority. ousside cf
Philadsl slphia the vote viii be very etose.

MILwAUTsR The retnrns will be con.
pared with the election Of two years Sgc,
when the Democratic Reformezs carried shs
State by 16,o00 majority.
Second Dispatc Returns from thirty
Eve towns and precincts give TAILOR, Demo.
cratic candidate for Goyernor, SSoo0 majority
Rerubiican gain OF 475s
THIRD Dispatch - The returns from Stha
city of Milwaukee and from eigkty.1fe
towns give Taylor Democrat and Reform
candidate for Goyernor1 u majority y-s Be
publican gain OF 10, OH. Il, e.
The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1875-11-03

nUMNEEa CARpa. e9 20 &6 pex saoas
k1 sss al 10 nisPA1t,d fsIsss ~
The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1875-11-03

OREGON.
A dispatch from Portland, Oregon, says
later election returns indicate the election OF
Lane Dem.) for Congress. A dispatch from
Salem says the returns indicate the election
Of Warren (Rep.) by small msjority.
The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1875-11-03

EOR RENT, TWO OF TIE MOST la
II DESIRABLE DWELLINGS, In the city III
one on Franklin street between seventh ana Elenua
streea the other on sixth street between Main
franklin streets, To persons desiring nouse ~
crent opportunity. Epr information apply at No.
III corner of Franklin and Sixth streets. -
The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1875-11-03

ZOE BENZ, q very desirable BHTCK 60
Il. HOUSE on east Broad between Tyeafy. e,
seventh and Twenty eighth streets. Price. 42k ree
no 3-3t Real Estafa I9ess.
The Middlebury register. [volume] (Middlebury, Vt.) 1850-1882, 1875-12-21

s<s- Petitions by hundreds Of thou
sands have been presented TO Congress,
thus early in tho session, asking for the
appointment Of commission to regulate
the liquor traffic. A bill looking to
such result was introduced into the las,
Congress but it was allowed to die nat.
ural death. There was some excuse fol-
it, however, as it came in late and Their g
was vast amount of important matter
to be disposed of. On Thursday last
Senator Howe introduced another bill re.
quiring the presisent to appoint com.
mission of five persons, neither of whom
shall be q Federal office-holder nor an
advocate OF prohibitory legislation, mol
Of total abstinence in relation to alcohol
10 liquors, who shall serve without sAla
ry, and within two years investigate The
liquor traffic, its relations to revenue anC
taxation, and its general economic, Grim
inal, moral and scientific aspects, in con
nec.ion with pauporism. crime, socia
vice, the public health and general wei
fare OF the people, and also to inquire
and take testimony as to tho pi actical re
suits of prohibitory legislation for thu
prevention Of intemperance in the sever
al States of the Union. The bill appro
PIRATES $4,000 for necessary expenses
and requires the commission to report tn
result of their investigations to the presi
dent, to be by him transmitted TO Con
gross. This bill, if passed, may an'
probably will do good in calling atten
ton to somt Of the evils Of the liquo
traffic But is there not danger that tn
work of the commission may prove
partial failure for the want Of at least
minority favorable to temperance legisla
ton Is this bill an endeavor to seem
ingly comply with the numerous request
and yet prevent having anything don
which will be offensive to the powerful
liquor dealers and manufacturers who S
largely control many Of the Compression
al constitute ncies?
The Middlebury register. [volume] (Middlebury, Vt.) 1850-1882, 1875-12-21

* There seems to be difference o
opinion as to who would be president in
the event Of the death Of President
Grant. Some assert that Speaker Kerr
would be the lucky accident, while Others
assert the legitimate succession OF Senn.
tor Ferry, who now prcsides over the de-
alterations of the upper house, In order
to put the matter at rest, Senator Ed
munds has submitted resolution tina
the Senate proceed to the election of I
president pro temporc Gu the 9TH of Jan
uary proximo. Mr.. Edmunds own opin
ion is that Mr.. Ferry is now the presi
dent Of the Senate and that he cannot b.
displaced without doing violence to Law
and usage, But with many others b
prefers to have rho matter definitely set
tied.
The Middlebury register. [volume] (Middlebury, Vt.) 1850-1882, 1875-12-21

bel for divorce. Stewart & Eldredge
for petitioner. Granted for desertion.
Sarah NJ. Conner VS.. Stephen Con.
nor. Libel for divorce Stewart Il Ell.
dredge for petitioner. Granted for dis.
ertion,
R.R. Hill VS.. Freeman Gustav Stew.
art q Eldredgc for pltf Defendant dc.
faulted.
p. md NJ. T. Bristd VS.. Z. T, COL
lias, ct al. Grandey & Chapman FOL
pltf Defendant defaulted.
A. l. Brown VS.. Elias Bennett, Mar
din for pltf. Defendant deiaullcd.
c. Hill VS.. II, r. Holden. Siurtevan
for pltf. Defendant defaulted.
State VS.. Frank Emery Information
for burglary. Sentenced to State prisor
at Windsor for three years.
The following appointments were an
nouncod: j. G. Wellington, treasurer
Calvin Hill, county auditor Calvin Hill
j. W. Martin and Edwin Vallette, com
missioners of Jail delivery at Mddlobury
j. Il. Roberts, g. L Stevens. NJ Il. Fish
er, at Vergennes Charles II. Lane Corn
wall, j. II. Lucia, j. s. Hickok, d. II
Lewis, Vergeunes l.. d. Eidredge, L
Edwards Smith, Il. A. Sturtevaut, Mid
dlebury, notaries.
The court adjourned Friday noon.