, 1875-11-07
THE BAR ASSOCIATIVE
Draft OF q Bill to Prov;a.
Appeals from q District ~
Judge.
Status Of the Gases Against r....
Goodrich, and Hiu

The Chicago Bar Association heid Il,
monthly meeting in the rooms At NJ ~ .ssaias
lson street yesterday afternoon Il 3 n;,1als a's
Among oesoea.
we're Messre- Withrow, Thompson p.
fence' Black. Waite, High, Rishoc pas.
Vaughan, Small, Obadiah Jsckson pneh
house. ~' A1a "hsss'
Inc PRESIDENT, Benjamin F. Aver Fso
aueted the proceedings. and H. II. 1.,.sso w.
Esq, acted Is Secretary. A'oa
| Ine 1feasorers monthly report sbou.a a..
there was On hand Oct. 2, sl,1es 5a. .... ae
from annual dues and admission fee. 4tesased s,and
tosat credit account 31,29353- debit Slai
s5f6.l5; balance on hand, $9I7.A3. S'eas
BILL 70 PROVIDE Yo1 AppEA1s
| W: +. Black Esq, read the following ,nau.
nnF,; vuf'ns th oe1etlea discussion On the guais
| 70 TIC Tr<stdent and Asnbe7s Of tn ccx
The Special Committee to whom v.s -r,.-..
matter oi The Preparation of draft 10. iii = y
of error from Judgments, orders. .nd 3sel.a ND ~.
Circuit Court held By the District Juaas af q ths
t7ict sitting alone, under the resolution see y
thst tbeT hsTa On ssp n IT, b :
pose contemplated By the RESOLUTION, ~neh thse o as
With respectfully submit to tae ASSOCIATION fT I, a
siae11@on ALL "e'son- y. ?. BLACK,
J. L. Hog
CA1oAGo, Nov. G, 1875. caeascn, caess9s,
SECTION L. Be- 1t enacted By the sen,ss ma ~
oi representatives Of the United 8ta, Il consrs.s
Tint from al 6nal DEGREES IN css.s of await
aeEsd IN aoy Circuit Court, held By tho Distr Jns
Of The district sitting alone, where the n,ttr h 81
ATrAAHa nrry f4 Ir~t.4
costs. and where no appeal to tho sunrs,ns cn"'s =
the United States Ia provided BY hw, In aursai ss
b allowed to the Circuit Judge Of MD Hitrte+ =.
termine such appeal ''~~S Acaae
SEC 2. IN ca3e OF m appeal - provided br ,as ,.
ceding secton- the Judge aud parties aha| ns. =.
origins! papers and proofs in the cause, or 1es q
peal. ~ W. ~
SIC. 3. Final juaenentz ct c,na
aoaft ths pstrie hda ,;t,'nu ss The .n, District
where the matter in dispute exceeds the su - .sat
OF $500 exclusive Of costs, and where no Wit 1t e
Is & I1oytdsd de- By hw from the Supreme court d H.
affirmed BY the Circuit Judge Of aaid Dstt nrs.
Judge. - -'' "$<0a9
errors from any Anal ozler or decrse IN nv esns
proTd for in thia act the Circuit Judzo NAY .o,
mod11y, or reyaEso any Judgment DECREE or ordsy -
the Circuit Court held By District Judge aasnf
such Judgment, Decree or ordar to b. fcade,ed ~
eu'h further proceedings to bs hsd - tia tusaee Il
the case msy req IRE.
Sec. s. No judgment, decree or ozdr of usrsa
Court held By the District 1utige Of the Dis1ia n
ting at.ne, shall be reviewed By Circuit jude Asr
IN provided, On wit Of error or appeal nul.u IL
within ai1 months aftAr the entry of suc }rdoneot
decree. or order: Provided that vhau paEtJ e1ttI3
TO prosecute sach writ Of error, zke such arpes Il
an infant. non eoupos nsen<a or 1mpraonsd soca nj
ar xnrh
tAken within nx months after tho anry of ths tgde
ment, decree, or order, exclusive ot ths tina Il aA
disability.
SEQ. 6. When upon writ of e1ror or appeal ta Il.
Circuit Judge aa herein provided, tbs Judamens a7d
OF decree Is affirmed BY the Circuit Jndgn hera iaad
be adtudged to the respondents IN e1ur Or sppelas
tust damage for the delay, and etnzo dr doohe con
1t the discretion ct satd Circuit Jodge
SEC J. From Ill tnter3ocntory nrder3 of dazs8
made In the Circuit Court by the District Judge Il A&
District sitting alone, which affect substantial nxat
OF either party to the czuse, including tha g7ahaS
md dissolution Of njunctions, and The appetutnest
md removal Of Receivers, appeals shall be to tas IT.
cult Judge IN the same manner Il hatetnhefo.e po
xtded for appeals from final judgments Or dscrea.
F; Withro". Esq, from The comaaists% p
pointed to prosecute
d.. LRARY
for the alleged forgery Of an Affidavit, submitted
& verbal report 10 which he stated that ths mt
ter had Teen brought before the Supreme Coz,
and toe case was Bot for oral argument tho dns
nay OF The ne1t term, 70 De haid At apIIng1a4
He WAS not confident Of the result and LaU9
had produced Ewo witnesses to dispzore tho H.
legations and Offset tho testimony Of CoHp.E
who had appeared against him II thu casa
should be decided in LesrY's favor, be p1opossa
% enter other charges against him, and, ca no
ion Of Mr. Pence, khe Committee Was copannad
.i'h b power to act az they deemed best-
Adulpb Moses. Esq, Chairman Of tho Com
nlttee appointed to attend to the cases Of
GOODRICH AND BILL
:eported that he hsd brought the case ot ths
:ormer before the Supreme Court. and vss eo1d-
lent that be would be dlsbar1ed. He hsd hsd !
orief printed containing the divorce laws Of u
he States and several OF the Territories, but b
:ould not discover that of Utah il say Of "a
libraries. Goodrich. however. had come to hiu
wish copy OF the law, and. in reading Il %
ound clause which provided TOR she dlsbau1nS
u any attorney who stirred up divorce Gtgaaon
Chis caused hearty laugh from tho msnbe1
present at the meeting. Mr, Moses W. $50
confident that Hill would be disoarred NM
)'BEien il Goodrich's counsel The txo Cous.
nis1ses were returned 3 vote OF thann a@
heir action indorsed.
The bill Of $6975 required for tho preseeS
ion OF Goodrich and Hin WAS audited