, 1875-05-01
An 1nsinuation by Beach that Mrs.
Tllton's Testimony Has
Been Omitted.
Dafendant's Counsel Conclude Not
to Use Her as q Witness.
Judge Nelson Was Glad Of It, Though
She Might Have Testified.
Con. Butler to Be Called to Kobut
Tracy's Evidence.
ANOTHER EPOCH.
kr1lfNAnY.

Sptctat Dttuatch to The cateaos Tribune.
New YoRx. April 80.-The ctosB.exaninasion
Of Tracy WIS finished to-day, and tho defendant
then rested bis caae. The plaintiffs counael Of
fored to consent to tho calling Of Mrs. Triton ~
visncas. but tho offer NAB not accepted.
In tho afternoon tho prosecution began to cnll
their Witnesses In rabuttal. Charles q. Stanley,
George ". Maddox, and John 8winton wore
allied to testify In relation to tas Roussol pro-
,cssion In December. 1871.
THE ATTENDANCE.
The Hon. D. Rice, OF Dea MolncB, Ia., nat On
Tic bench.
Tho courtroom was crowded moro elouo1y
!han 1t has bccn 1t sny ttu1o since 1Fr, Deochor
loft tho wiinosB stand. In tho after
noou when 1t became known that tho
1efouso bud rested it's case, and
Tint tho prosecution wonld call Witnesses In re-
bulta), tho audience Increased In size md tho
doorway leading Into tho nudonco room bocame
onco mora crowded With people s ho woro ANXIOUS
70 hear tho proceedings. although they weEo
Obliged to stand aud pcor one ovor anothcr's
shoulders.
0ue Of The most
1elatcd 10 tho Interview between 0nn. Tracy aud
Mrs. Mouttou, nbout tbo tlrno when hIr. kfou1-
toms short Btatemont to tho Committee Was sub
stitutcd for his long ore. Mr: Beach nskod II
kHo H1kAGpo ~ tAA* &AtHA A4%kA EflA w OAtbA
Moulton "fsmma. you arc = bravo womau. You
havo aaved tho old nan to-d1Y;" aud II no
had questioned her whether nho wouldn't de-
stroy certain papeta ii Jeremiah r. Robinson
sver ,!aes that statemons and letter you will bo
rnined, socially, financially. hnd In eyory way"
Mr. Tracy replied that he Ind had convsrta-
ton With Hrs. Mou1ton on tho subjects roforred
stance, 1t was not what tho question embraced.
l}efora replying IN reference to thts oonverua-
tion, Mr. Tracy objected to going into 1t, on tho
ground that 1t vas a confidential couyorsatson
between AErs. Moulton and hluaaelf. Again. on
Ills redirect examination, Mr. Tracy said that
ho hornd he would not be questioned about tho
dotailB OF that conversation; but bis objection
Was act aside. le testified thai nothing waa
said about tho destruction Of papers elthae then
or at future date. Mr. Tracy denied that ho
acter In previous convorHation with 1lra. Moul-
ton In 1874. Mr. Beach said TINT le intcndod to
recall 1frB. Moultou and question her In refer
once to theao conversations.
Tie redirect examination Of Mr. Tracy by Mr,
Evarts dEow ont the fact that, before Afr. Til
toms Bworn abatement whB rnado public, Mr.
Tracy had oonsuIted With others in loforcncc to
procuring An injunction to prevent it's deatruc-
Aou.
SENTIMENT N new YonK AND nEooKLYN.
Tho refusal OF Doecher'x COUNSEL to ca1 blrs.
TlltoD caused great oxoltomcnt In tho court and
much unfaYorablo commcnt throughout tho city.
Eor Wf6AH past ll11- 1llkou mas qeE1 Q0Quf Caro-
ful examination. 4 mouth hso council avoucd
their purpose to cali her. and only last Monday
ono Of the counsel stated that she would follow
blurat Ialstoad who WAS to hayo been Called ao-
cordiug to tho aatno authority. on tho oonclus1on
of Mr. Traoya Testimony. Judge Nelson had
llready expressed IN intention to ndmit her to
tasslfy II 1iltonb counsel did NOT object. and 1t
Was tue general public impression that sho ought
10 be calod by Doochers aIde. There Is no
doubt that tho failure to do 10 has At least mo-
mcntarily damaged Deechor'a case In public ossi-
nation.