, 1875-02-20
tjon wv Nose Va suIAA SVokAehe-

x.ntio iae as ~ ~ sdoptsd :, hs regular snnua Con-
WI - found N iss 81 & ss ,o;naP " e. .Sa
G"a,s1toa ao ~, wSra fer wora 4 hs: e,er lines re-
th.t Convention adopting rosies Of ru,cs noiunne
a, , On; IN Gae.,'on y resordel hs 4 paee Of IT,
ou, snea suss ID ste II: ., :. m
ips ss.a ado IN ~, j, order Of shs Gonsenan, e.
"ps u 10 o,asr doet rot .e.m . ,ppear II
'utc* IN 1871. ~ nlicased hs n<niine It she Rues
OF Order has constituted pr. of the regular nfo.
Canon T. Ta L.. Of the Diocesan C1nons. ss,ch resd.
1923 T. required to te had >: zach sMnal Convention,
acta." 1'' - ''e'''
Thns It viii be seen that
| THE RULE UNDER CONFEDERATION
ahe1ly rooted IN the Laws Of tbs piuccse. Tho Cen
70 th. election .: Dshop. aud q. guent'on. under ts
tim Of The l,y delegates from 1artsh, mttst be con-
rsue Tith refetnce to Tits rn!o that ha s:aoda u,i-
o Ii. r and Via ~ e. aaosS e ~ mo
anu II i important to odd that tho trsctcs In the
Convention. ever t!uoe tho rus slopsed IN 1851,
noat.ali.c and nat a. represented In eas " voss. o.
nsl i. leen inteaded 10 change I'll. prattlee by sho
adoption II ISL OF th. afcl, of Ale Constitution ,I-
dtr Cont!de1 Ii1on. such Intention would have been
expressed ~ no nncsttafn words. :or there sYer
unl The teoea, spsci Convention WIEN motion ,u't 10
anend ~ strtkng out the ias: causn bsios that III
p1s. u s a9n III Of IL,
yery Ie:iied yois: ciersy-ayes, Is; noes, II.
XIX - .eo po @ ~. yp.s istsa sofs
u tbs Nhoe ane"tson theu for the arst ms brought
Into controversy.
IN tho EsKstvo parIah half Of wtoss delegates vota
n the Affirmative, that ibis "nensraiztng clause u
rnls s.5. nothins Of the kind md to idsA nropotsd
IS the fruit Of vivid imagination. Indecd, 10 nj
nlud. tie suggestion is - absu1a Tho proposition
70 enunt Affirmative votta Ia tbs negative |. mon
srocs The rule provides tn t!e ouseat, that Quca-
tont shall be decided but III This form. v1z.: sAs
many - sre Of the contrary opniun. ssy No." And
lence s argued thas legislative action only Ia con.
T . 1o he 81 Fa ss IT. IT, b.,s T.
relation 70 other - re to legislative questions
Tho el:ase pfses.liae s1s Is. declares ia.
oEo voe .n,onsst the lay" II shs ooaay,.cton lug.
y+s.o! Is tefabe, .ha: all tho provisions q tho re
quoted utt imply that in all matters other than teajs.
iss!so action auch, fot nss.nre, the election Of
iasy.a @'An''a nj moro s1'n ono '''' anons's tho
have remarked above, that
THE fU1E TO TAuLE
thd motion 70 strike out the ctaune referred to nust h
rouc!n1sve OF tht whole 1utstop rnenn Of rnurrr
thas Il ,O's. 10 % contuslre II thntt was an7
ortn Question IN TIE pscEsea befoya vbIrb tbtre VA
not. Tbs motion to strke out VIA tn.de With =, pecsl
reference to the vnR for Bl.hor that ~. ,ea aSost
he stter q as1;ded parishes. In ehoosns : si,hor
The nAhop 13surB in evtry Diocese shal be eao.
eeo AefenAoy 10 it1rh rukn ~ may ho h1ed By TIN
e~fases " ths 1 oessc. haF. u, ns'oro Tho voso
tho meaning Of kl.e Contribution, or Of the rnlo under
consideration, IN respoct % uhsthsr divided parish
ep ths aaeston w siosed bsyont i. dispa.. % sfter
re vo:e taken for " The vote he Convention t1ed
emtor ~ ,.,t n o,s.1ea pas@nes M shsre y no
Any attoaps e 10 20 would b n dlfact violation OF
ntt tas aenss ~ ~ c1nsaa'on Is Indicted ~ "a tho
stoud bo eou,ted aad vhAt not and that holy h.v-
MI. frnn e9.t aha6H ot ~ DELI
vots ot such ee9Ee9at.on" hc Hs,tsr eadsi. md
P'9;1n w., oe!one sa a1sp.s nna neyopa sprsa:
,nI snd tns n,.. h th,} 70 ~ ss % e'sy
qaeauon ~ oa tne nomination ot d. D. Koven
as 10y fseent Consenuna We properly counted -
"roting thn Don" - Wv
u Srssa sn,s matter tng because IT,
Of Dr.: pt .,.tn,* s!.,;.oa 20 matter was. yow my
r. ,Nasfa 70 ~ tsgat o. ton Cnaneeor Of the
tor psao ier tiers wsro oy saae 1ots eo,e se,
~ 'nG vi ~ o. sas apnnAon % u ~ to
re;cqrr a ~ ,nsesnn ns @ 1aG' or o. 70 sh
ID = Tos. ant from teas fsy.nine the votes Of
tae two Gh noeos 80 dsaasis tTsatyn!ns would
euus.e' an neeeesaly ma19t1!5s oeng TWO !eas than
sea rtn ,r ts a Il, nu.o. e ~ ~ totes OF no
nation m II ther ~ t,cSnrssi fro1n tis
.arms.ttys o. rat ~. tM m , - ,1e
e Isaa n. satsst ana pr: ~ hssfns election Il
@ @ ~ ss1as.oas a,, y. .ae @ w. 4'sso ~ su.es'
Ahh sot: ~ " lAh eMAnckLl1A .s. ~ " IhE CATTLE
DnALt Np THE cHAScELLos or TUE DIOCESE.
But WI about these two vote.z The records con-
in no e. sd.nea tt these tTo Chancellors voted At
All 10 thd mattef Q! eecn8 Ushop: nor yet u there
snJthlus 10 show how they Voted II case thsy did
IAe Totu u WA " haot The ballot Implies eecrecy.
"a what way thtn. u i bishoslatvelJ stated that
etther th Chancellor Of tho Cathedral or tho chance
lnr q u DoTese vnted at Ill for nahop. "ad II 1t
all now 1t VII noe DO 70 sns'es that those officers
were optn AtTocatea OF d. % koyent election, aud
ihH slows from ths that tat5 voted for him. Buch
TeAeonn 9 may pr,Muso iar tuplsos!tion Of moral
conSiea on hut such euPFoatlon Or conviction IL not
proof. hnrcly the Mshnr~ and Standing Committees
o. o:hu octssf canot take tes EIaned that illegal
uoear 10 ths tey TsFs eaat toE nt Dc Kossn
EhAtes to Iustituto The cas Inquiry into tho matter
The II F,peht they un,!rraie this ehey tread uEon
danEt otis ground. and threasea tn Independence of
the pI ,:eao concerned Neither ntshors nor Standing
cou 'Etces can misach, or tron 9utstion. tho aunu
such matter, And upon this view might rat The
whnl question Of the right Of thesa CAAune!ors to