, 1875-05-07

nose,sttyo oondlcs Of siiars and ii, preservation
n% @ ., sns .i, tni. maer IN touht Tar tha
C",neii 70 undertake 70 er:rrian doubtful ~ers unle.s
l,ci{ess ~ .ny aacn stsemrs vii Go n,.i.. wl,st We
iri,s. saaa.i ii having hsa''s te'., 20 that
sr.,.a "Y mt n,ee.; ss s' to meet 'f '' Imminent and
Iuias 1esfcnin continued. The ,nasn attempt ot
Tho argument Of Ill The eoa"ael w.' to so~ that His
NO Jun1sp1crtos OVER THE onintxAL ntI1-
THAI quo,on waa rcaII,. in c pserens at.ge Of Tho
lictIy c1pcrlcd by 1t least ono of the gentlemen
sho other sle ..i shs jtrsastIou Of tic Court oyss
H. E ''.s' 81 s.er # Ill @ va oo9 t.
aurl, !njunct!nn ss eornp1sinansA asked for.
iaeis sliesed in ~ .upplem.at.l IIl in eoaneeon
position On q lii iioaof proper, ..u
Judge DiekeJ--You haxs tnIs.prrehended Ill q rs.
Jurisdiction under either hils. but u under ths .nf-
Elemental h'il, II statutory. and no injunction
eoSs gaass ~ IL smother instance Of tbs
harmonious atys In which ths Qentlsmsn ptaaont helr
case. ;",,, n,.,,,.v,,on !, ,on ,,,.<o,
Judge h'"f'';snn7: w,ar T,a,s; 4ut,:1 SAID.
Mr Tniey Sss % tn, wnt TX l Aa :, H. ole,.
III %h,1 III eaa aniy e e stsr tbe vots w de-
~ ~ y ~ w,a tst undsr ts roYn. Of lis
,.,. nv y. ~. cii,ans neht oons lnt tns ureuI.
Gm,t mi ri. Iii In contest Of an e.crtEon f,nI that
w,s viii thjs suutlsmennl bill wa.} i,u. they could
ontY ,o 20 sfler ths yo.s .4al been declared.
Jndss 1..wreucs aa.I.e III. genlonlen to hold eon-
tnIr xtu,,neute IL, et.lut to haTioui.a them. liz
| rrsH Mr, Tatrys po.tnn ~ reported in TIN Tntn.
unE aud Air. Tney saiA II vas ters atacd corrsctly.
Tuo Ua,rt-Whers in fh& Itnes1 asn graft Ad-
m.cr Of tGe Ttnns and always road It. tI,ugh,er.l
| Jtt)9n fAwroLcp-I eAnnos concur With Your Honor
| III itai admiration, fIeuewel n,eErncnl liz then
went to SAY that although ae considesal the ghcs-
tlon Of very lItls ps.eca Importance. yet Wal
connected with hs tl.1t IL should
us hardly knew any otAer reason far ii. gentlemen
I'll a % Seans upo
question which would htro4fter aslse In tas Court
tcmpt In d!aobuy!ng Ills llonor'a o1ler. Tia
jaIal!e!iSu Il sas Court s,;u,, to I'm i...' M
sSeusa: ~: isr isf o y t.
Council from performing merely rnnseri'l aa.y.
i.hy said in liz newspapers about ihs poxer Of =
eofl to enj"n ths proceedings & .hs Cornell The
e ooass M II iS.t respes vera % 10 %rerisct, dahs
Tint Ii WA hardly matter for dsonssan. Whero Tbs
"ss os II tbs se iaF. eo yen by III CHARTER, oi
court Of e9ay h,a 10 to interfere
oraaseo no sesatios 'n s pace, sor esiaShns
ssx, Tfrs wI!a
Intelligent court would sten 10 application for an
nianstioa .eala.t thsn + IL: pe1fasn.us: i duties
OF that character. But whsn they eatln to the
| PERFORMANCE " MEtE MiHtSTEHtALADT,
where tllose wps 10 rcrrtio whers tluy called
iron simply 10 10 sing which either Htt nut IL
done or cun,l he donr only In particular way.
tuou tleY wers a. much N1tl1iu tile Jurisdiction Of
court Of chaHcery ~ private ldfilal. the spoas'
q tsiell pros solea 10 prove W 9Mosanunt from M
thnritles that tas eahsAAs'ns u Ine 'os VA uAa14
teElal AZ;
AS next sHesfea 10 tne q"esllon VI
| 1uhiaDlcTloS' -.
bayng That ths backs wers mn OF instahcts Tneft
| enlss bad enJotnsl lublc officers fFtnn doing ~
which hs 1taiule commanded thon 10 10, and would
continue 10 do 80 II the performance of tia ACT under
tue circumstances w!s uu]ailhhiis. Improper, snt
lneGuitae, and would result In either public Or pr
ysts injury. Ths bill sas forth That tsTep4ra
tls injury would result betauss Q! the -
and II that Eool cause for insosf.ronrs ths cnnr
lsd jnrtdttIon to Interfere. lie nuaesauoa TINT ~
Eun.i"it contemplated passing nn orfnAn'a to Etsl
tbs Hoard Of 1ul.es, wuua that hot .1u4 70 esn4 :.
confa.ion and:,!o ialnry7
hut It urged that thers waa no jurisdfction be
eau.o OF statutory provision which pointed out !
nols Of eonto:1ng an eeeton. snA that ths com