The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-03-02

MT @. F. HoAR, rep.) of Mass moved TO suspend the
rules and adopt the preamble and resolutions reported
by the Select Committee on Louisiana Affairs, recon-
mending the LOUISIANA House of Representatives
edy the injustice done in the exclusion from that body
OF persons rghttully entitled TO and recogpz
ing Kellogg as Governor till the end of the term.
Messrs POTTER, (demD OF n. Y; NIBLAcK. (dem) of
Ind. and other democratic embers asked Mr. Hoar to
separate the resolutions and the be on
OF them, but Mr. Hoar declined to accede 10 that re-
quest
The motion was rejected-yess ls4, nays ss-not the
necessary two-thirds in the affirmative.
Mr.. HoAR then moved TO suspend the rules SO a. to
bring the two resolutions before the House. the vote %
be taken each OF them separately and % decided
by majority.
Mr. Porter, Of New York. objected to the proposition
a. he regarded the resolution recognizing Ksloggs
usurpation as most revolutionary and dangerous
Mr.. HOAX said that the desired BY the
majority of both parties
Mr.. PorTxR-No, not OF both parties.
Mr. HoAR-rhey are In the interest Of peace
Mr.. PorrEs-It will be the peace which cometh by the
sword
Mr.. HoAR-If you want the peace that cometh with
the sword 0he rest of the sentence was inaud,ble)
MI. PorrER-lhat all the peace You ever succeeded
in bringing by federal interference.
Mr. GARFIELD, rep) Of Ohio said would insist on 60.
ing on with the appropriation bills unless BY unanimous
consent separate votes could be taken two
Inc vote was taken on Mr. Hoar's motion, and it was
nays IS, Mr. stephens (dem.) OF Ca. being the only
The mrs. rssonuon recommending the restoration to
sss a:
wt hs seco aiy rssn.,,or r.oo,,,, u.,
NOR q 0Tisi;Ss
Mass sener rep Of va and smith, uep Of
ing the only republicans voting NJ. u.
amid n,e,rnp,iops and calls to order from the demo
y ss p
af he ican pnnlp
THE APPROPRIATION BILLS
priations reported the Deaciency bill approprisns
$4,000 So g, ordered to IT be printed ..,.
bill were nonconcurred in. and sent 10 q confer
rne c9nerencs report on the Military Academy APP
ssas S Snd
bill were presented and acted The amendments,
Ts question was raised DIV" was the
PEACE Sas q!
s s s'
sho nsd sne aM c0ns
MT PtRKER, Gep.l Of Mo, replied to Mr.. Randall AMI
h s
were much less than those paid tor army purposes At
After iurher co!loQuy the amendment was concurred
he atoms of the Committee on Appropria.
the bill was then sen. to conference committee ~ AA0
ME- a4 ARR Of Ohio from the coniefelce Commit
e Ss ndn that a.
d the a Ssses on an
S from Gf II ,Ss that the
having control q ss mmsdise srsirs and said
o the as
officers Of The senate Aite. discussion Tr. Hoimans
Of
Fort OF 4na sss ans S ANA
s wR H. nsss rep NJ
" In the chair and resumed the consideration Of the
Sn 81 " h
OF M f 81 h t
torna.the famous Mcasrrahan claim against The New
M 9Aans1D renewed the point of order asains. the
a%end%ent' but the point M, was 9verrpled
suit ss %s @ sc Mr. Butler against
On he Of Ss Tns hys
o. about ago acres ana who have taken millions dol
oDeo. of tn. suit to be COM
on re e ss e ns
Pis..Tns law invite: :: Who citizen.
NJ. susH1sSAnd nobody etssi i ! -1' ''''p' 'A'~-
these men and re gOveroment The QUESTION has been
the BEEN decided ns ana me sHaa
that the te Is In the government These men do not
authorize the governmental commence SUIT the
MT. Lanai. @em3 of Miss said that he could not give
his support to the proposition without further expana
i,s Mo;H sp} Mass said that the resolution
Of eoieasus r sus
In violation Of the law, which prohibits any ofcer
q
g .: n IN .ns
did Zee Isn on should nave been
sv..E. replied that in offering the resolution some
Judiciary COMMITTEES ana Il had beeh adopted by the
range Of asd with auicfsver ore, &c and
sn ns t os years had
mining law. A man named Mcaarrshan claimed the
's ss Sts Sssa
@ss ana very ss@.sSsSs .@ess every ns seersslDiy
me G1' E q hsa before
n:d oos Sso;s s .4s III
tion
Mr. BUnxs ;;oy no means wish could say so.
La
and
properly 70 act 10 the case therefore want special
ana hs ought sss undsT n M:
nave ali A applied for their patents un
sSsIs SI agree tina. they have; tn. mining laws
give them aeGnt feet and they attempt to cover 1900
Nr. PAs..rhsy cannot DO 50 under the law
10 the trouble. 1t been before Congress since
here and that question could be got tested
There always something in the way
Mr. e. X. uoAR-I take that my colleague does net
to ex-Attorney General who ever
peared before his committee.
Mr.. BU7LER-By means; my colleague has only
lately come into the House.
MT: HoucSToS, uep2 Of Cal, opposed the amendment
ever heard. He had always understood that before
suit instituted there should be matter OF
troversy between the parties action, his claim
Of Mcqarrahans had failed before The United States
before the State Courts California before
Congress- The New ldria Mining Company had con-
teste that claim and had expended It's money assert
ton was to institute suit the name OF the United
states against these parties who tor years been
tending the title OF the United states.
MT NInLAcx remarked that The New ldria Mining
the mining law 1t entitled only some 5000 feet
OF the attorneys Of the New Idria Mining Company.
QUESTION
Mr.. HouGnToN-Not that I ever heard Of myself
have been counsel for that company some OF these
li9auon the object Of the company being to defeat the
claim Of McGarrahan and to establish the Utle OF