The Dallas weekly herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1873-1885, 1875-01-30


1857 4 Ciinuphl ~ pGClnpmrh ~
Mdh Don Fdqi lrcct, Ebr"Wd'
1888 Zen 4 Hand " Jonathan Petty J
1850 Burke q linrksdnlc vHJ " Car
ter a Go.
1gll n a u Teal. w RUll Sc0tt I|
1913 i VI Brown W ThOs Flynn =, y
1916 Henry Carr, admir- y" Lynl" .
Wright al
1851 Adnlinp |. Newton W , d u
Adams at nj :
1854 j w Haynes Va w + Bnchmhh
1856 n w House VI a j Mccnn
1857 " II witt etal W Jas Is Hines v
1850 ] G Seydell w Flndley " Miller ~
1904 James Conner w @ III Beau- IL
champ .,
1864 Cal & Tex II Con Co w Geo II
Bondie
1868 Sueed & Finlny w IL ii Hoode IT,
1872 T. j Parish w Jos Dawson et al ~
1914 Sue Robinson W. II q Bower 10
1919 J Rafferty, q Co vs. Thos Corco- ~
ran -
1850 ] NJ Haney vs. a Il Self ct al u
1852 ID A Canady "s ID a Anderson ls
1886 b Marcus vs. II B Archer, 10
1857 Thos Darlington vs. Ogden " "
Davis =,
1858 w II Witt VS. j NJ Keen ct al y
1890 + NJ Ewing vs. Ault jenkins " -
Ault
1903 NJ D&PD Vershonder vs. Jno %
Wyatt
Second Week. rebrnary sth 10 1ifh.
First Day, Seco"d lIcck, HO|ad'y ~
1925 "B" Jas G Allen vsJ NJ Brown !
1896 } II Oguinis ct al VS. w ii Wy >
att ct nj
l7Ol Ralph, Levi & Co VS. l. Aschaf- 3
fenburg
1902 J A Hall VS. G i Holland !
1907 ] G Sevdeli VS. VIM Worthipg- .
ton and J NJ Mcneil
I7OS James NJ Lane VS. } l. Franks u
and j + Jettries
1909 J w Willard VS. } Lee Able I
IVA w r. Wilson vs. r II Stewart 5
17l7 J n Newnsan w $ j. Easily y
l7lO 10 Willard VS. j Lee Able 10
1920 Robert Royster VS. r II Stewart II
1923 Clark & Bryan vs. JAS l. smith II
l724 Il G b )wer, admir-, vs. } Z Sey-
dell and s l. May :.
l725 Thomas Field vs Johnson d II
Tucker
1925 # ] Putty vs Ganse & Miller 10
1882 r Il Love ct al VS. Rich u Bru- ~
ton
l7S4 J III Eversole VS. r. II McClain II
ct al
1877 r G Campbell VS. NJ } p Hayes Is
l740 T. III Chase & Co VS. Lee Abe ~
Il Co
l742 A S Dockery vs. Pat O'Donol 20
ct al -, 40,
1745 Il III Chase & Co VS. Lee Able p
& Co oo
1747 r. Fl Motley VS. S j. Easy -
l75l b NJ Bell W. III Newman -
Second Dag, Second IFcef. February o.
1852 ] B Hamilton VS. II J Pollard !
1853 Adams &. Leonard VS. Lee z
Able
1854 III brennan VS. II X Drawer 3
1855 Richmond, Bowman e. Co vsJ 4
Lee Able
1857 Scott, Collins & Co >sJ Lee Able 5
Ll75S Rice & Byers VS. j Lee Able u
1850 Marx & Kampner VS. } Z biohn Z
III [. Caperan VS. j l. Pool 8
l7T2 NJ Montgomery vs. W III Gas y
ton etal
rl774 Young Bro q Co VS. G b Hol- 10
IT'S Orr & Lindsly vs. G b Holland jr y
I77G (has Sexton VS. w j McCaus. II
land 80
1779 w P Edmondson vs. G c BAN ID
croft and J f Manner -.
1850 w w Orr vs. Geo b Holland j. ~
1887 McSpadden & Oguin vs. John 10
Owens
17Ss s M Larkin VS. J w Thompson lG
1883 p j. Krouse VS. MOllie Cross II
1891 w L McGaughey VS. i West 10
1892 w l. McGaughey VS. + West 10
1895 III Frank vs. w A Jenkins etai 20
1897 l. A A Wright vs. A ii Will Il
liams
1898 Brown & Lang VS. Cameron %
Lancaster and Marman
1893 + E Pipkin VS. Cary Pipkin %
Third Doy Second )Ffek, February 10.
1901 NIL Thyng VS. Jas Jeffries ]
1903 Ward Dewey Il Co VS. W II Gas 2
1910 L A Maynard VS. J Fl Ryan 8
1871 w II johnson vs. J w Cobb 4
and II FL Sneed
1918 Jacob Waspie VS. Morris Will b
son
1914 Elizabeth Lynch VS. G M 6
Swink etal
1915 Elizabeth Lynch VS. \ Hamerly
1916 Elizabeth Lynch vslH s Ervay 5
1918 Elizabeth Lynch VS. III Shep- "
1920 R Reightley admir- vsJ G Sey- 10
dell etal
1921 P A Smith VS. f Williams ii
1925 S s Jones & co VS. g IL Beau II
champ
1881 u Gailaher VS. California rail. ID
way construction company
1882 w w Peak VS. city of Dallas IA
1894 Jos A Harris vs. city of Dallas 10
1887 Il II Tooley VS. Chas Bullock 10
1871 T. G Bower admr G. w Guess IL
VS. w j Clark etal
1912 P A Brandenburg VS. S Bran Is
denburg etal
1874 w II Greer VS. III and L G II X ID
company
1916 Voght & Deitzel VS. Robert Nc 20
Nab
1913 WI Wheeler VS. II andT G r q
II company
1910 A c. Blair VS. Hugh Moore %
1852 Schrader d Williams VS. Find. q
ley & Miller
Fourth Day, Second Week, February IL
1855 Richmond Bowman d Co VS. }.
A Rousell
1856 Rice & Byers VS. J A Eousell 2
1857 Scott, Collins d Co VS. Rou- 3
sell
1858 Sanford and wife Us Kendall etal 4
1850 Nj p Moore VS. NJ Webb b
1862 Smith Udell VS. Goslin d Co q
1867 John PROT VS. unknown heirs OF
w and f. Martin
1868 4 J Williams VS. VIM Housely 8
1871 Zrelda Stancel VS. Adeline Stan y
eel
1872 James Field VS. County of Dali 10
las and j NJ Brown
1877 John Lewis w Alkaline Lewis ii
1878 w A and G II Jenkins VS. ) II
Cox ctal
1880 Jno G Evans vs NJ Johnson Ii
1881 J J Quillon VS. County of Dallas IA
and ] NJ Brown
1886 Rowland etal VS. Bledsoe and 10
Chapman
1887 A McComas VS. i L Luce 10
1891 Thos A West VS. Cox & West IL
lS9G Thos Griffin VS. p ODOnnell d Is
Bro
1898 w Wilson VS. p ODonnell IL 10
Bro
1901 Jeffries & Terry VS. J + Eylar 90
1904 Il J Putty VS. & "A Cause Il
1905 L J Putty VS. J G Denney %
1906 Ii Boshall W. Green and Green 70