Clarksville weekly chronicle. (Clarksville, Tenn.) 1873-1890, 1875-12-04
cHANcERY COURT.
The following cases have been dis
posed. of by the court, which is now in

The following cases have been dis
posed. of BY the court, which is now in
session
Brown VS.. Moss--Decree of sale.
1arsus VS. Brandon-Finald decree for co M
plainant-
Outlaw VS. Bumpass-saie confirmed.
Mcclure VS. Lander-Pro confesso.
Vance VS. Evans-Refercnce on debts; &c.
Barbee VS. Aorrow-Pro confesso.
Hillman VS. Marable-Reference.
Goodiett VS. COtlier-hnal decree.
Mckay VS. McKay-Guardian ad Item APP
pointed.
Gross VS. Herring-Final decree for COM
plainant.
Grafton US Daniel-order for account.
King VS. Atkinson-report recommitted.
johnson VS. Thomason-Proc onfesso and
Guardian ad litem appointed.
Calhoun VS. Leech-order OF sale.
Cobb VS. Perdue-reference on Couts' Pc
tition.
Cobb VS. cReynolds-reference on Wis
dom's fees.
Baggett VS. Shelby-Decree ratlfying COM
promise.
Lewis VS. Erwin's heirs-motion TO dis
miss overruled.
Morrissey vs. SuTlivan-leave to answer.
Horn VS. Green-leave to answer.
Hornberger VS. Hornberger- sale con-
firmed.
Reynolds VS. Brandon-decree on Hum
ArInstead VS. Bradley-decree on Man
ning's petition.
Batson VS. Trotter-decree for costs,
Duff VS. Munford-finai decree ior defend
ants.
Morrison VS. Morrisen-pro confesso and
reference on debts.
Barker q Courts VS. Lynch-order of sale.
Ford VS. Ford-dismissed by consent.
Dortch & Bradley VS. Bailey-decree for
! fees of Hornberger House.
Oneal VS. Seldon-fnal decree for COM
plainant.
Criffey VS. Goodlett-reference on debts.
Ogbuir VS. Tay lor-order of sale revived.
Barker VIZ Gold-title to Merritt.
/ Trahern * CARROT VS. Mabry-dismissed.
Lewis VS. Bradley-dismissed.
Cnthrall VS. Matfill-dismissed.
Boardman VS. Willis-order 10 loan on
fund.
Keesee & Merritt vs. Kawis-decree of sale.
Howell VS. Malone-dismisscd.
Merritt VS. Leavell-reference on admins
traitors account.
! Harrison VS. Malone dismissed.
CARROT & Herndon VS. Wootten-receiver
appointed.
BranGon VS. Munford-order of sale re-
vived.
Little VS. Emory-title TO Eieazer.
Stephenson VS. Lacey-transfer confirmed
Bailey VS. Catlett-scire facias ordered.
billing VS. YateS-scire facias ordered.
Oneal VS. Selden, Hicks & Co-final decree
for compl't.
Oneal VS. Trice & Ourlaw-final decree foI
complt.
STRUNG deeds and appeal.
Roberts VS. Edmondson-sale confirmed
Young VS. Tax Payers-reference on Dicks
petition.
Moore VS. Dick-refereuce.
Grant VS. Grant-guaEdian ad litem ap'
pointed for Mrs. Gorrells children.
Merritt VS. Lovell-biddings re-opened.
Peacher VS. Duncan-same.
Reynolds VS. misunderstanding bill OF
review. ordering payment of taxes, &c.
Merritt VS. Steele-Order of sale revived.
Merritt VS. Hiter's heirs-final decree
resting title.
,;lardy VS. Clardy--survey ordered.
Jones VS. VIM Jones heirs-sale confirm
ed.
Shackelford VS. Harrell-same.
Whitaker VS. Clark dismissed.
Hopson VS. Mallory decree against Hol
! Inns, and appeal.
Watts VS. Howell dismissed.
Pettus VS. BarDee cause revived.
Peacher VS. AlonZo demurrer over ruled
Cousins VS. Grace decree of sale.
Williams VS. Williams order of sale re
vived.
Merritt & Fort VS. Shackelford reference
on petition of Beaumont and Others.
Howell VS. Poindexter; order tor account
White VS. Griffey; order on surety Il
Justify.
Herndon VS. Chester order for account
, Collins VS. Railroad leave to answer.
Dayie VS. Cornell F; confirming report &c
: Limbaugh VS. Brown ; sale confirmed.
Legrand VS. Stewart sale ordered.
Duckworth VS. Harris; pro cOnfesso.
johnson VS. Lyle leave TO answer.
Lyon < Ely VS. Turner; sale conflrme'
and title rested.
Jones VS. 10. NJ. Jones report with re
+ ceiver confirmed.
Moss VS. Herndon & Gold sale confirmed
Williams VS. Boyd sale confirmed.
Shackelford VS. Henry sale confirmed.
> Steele VS. Steele order o.. sale.
= Cathrall VS. Mattill order of dismissa
set aside.
Y Stewart VS. Wilcox order of sale.
Dick VS. Caldwell Shelton dismissed.
Martin VS. Quarles dismissed.
n Mari VS. Williamson dismissed.
Bruce ex parte I; dismissed.
= Rawles VS. Ramey & Dick; dismissed.
White VS. Smith dismissed.
e House VS. Bradley dismissed.
Ellis VS. Anderson dismissed.
], Caldwell VS. Boyd dismissed.
. Browder VS. Beaumont leave to answer
Browder VS. Crusman leave 10 answer.