New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-02-10

ness Identify that portion OF bis stattment why
| tanIy have objection To that
Mr. Rvars-Yes Sir; very well Now, Mr. Ti.ton-
| The witness-What Is the question
| Mr. Bvarts-Resd the question 10 him. please
| fQueston read by THE TRIBUNE stenographer.I
Mr. Evar.sI asked you read the last thero
| some variations In the general phrsscology Of It,
stonsgapher that tbs question read the last
one
Mr. Evar.s-Now will make new question and take Jour
Honor ruling Now II you viii write down, Mr. Stenograph".
my question ITO the witnessI DO you know or believe that
the written which you hold In your hands are the cop,
OF tho Catharne daunt letter. that personally laid before
the Committee Church examinatio0t No" walt thes
object TO that question.
Judge Neson-I think no may that. Look at The
paper
have every believe sir that thsis M HsTs-
cks copy few leaves OF Mr. Mavericks copy sgor
statement which laid before COMMITTEE which statement
incsded copy OF the Cathane and which state
meDt, In being laid before the Committee accompanied
also with the original crpt OF tho Catherine CANT letter
which carried TO the Committee which manuscript you sos
hold in your hand.
Judge Nc lson-But the question whether yoa
leavesf
The wtncss-Your Honor, those eavcs-
Mr. Evsrts-what was your Honors remark
Judge Nofson-I suggested "a him that thought your
question also involved this whether those leaves were part Of
hrs statement,
the very that he laid before the Committee Do not
what they in.
Jadge Ne.on-Do you say they are the very lesyess
Mr. Fulerton-No he says he has reason 10 believe
The wncs-I sayI every to believe 81. st
those few leaves part Of Mr. Maverick copy.
Judge Nson-They do not you that; matter about
his writing.
Mr. Evarts-0f course that Is unneoossary
Judge question H. whether those leaves Termed
part Of tho acknowledges very leaves
Mr.. Eyarts-n your Honor Ileasc we will have IL II u
proper
Judge Neison-Wen, you intorrogite him.
Mr. Evarts-It Is not in that view was speaking W"
going to say your win think proper we will have
the answer the stenoyraphcr has taken II down
ANSWER read by THE TRIBUNE stenographerl
Mr. Hyarts-very WE'LL all very well far-now VIII AK
another question very leaves that hold In your
hand were thy or not the very leaves far they went
the that put before tne Commeei a. Hea
Sir, have every reason to believe they are.
@ Yes that lerstand. A. Yes, Sir.
Mr. Beach-Whai That those placed befoe.he Com
mitteef
Mr. EvartsTboss very eayes were before Committee
The every to believe that those pages
o. o. IS and &c. part OF Mr. Mavericks copy Of NE
sworn statement laid In person before the Committee
Judge Nelson-No the inquiry Is whether u was part VI
the sworn statement itself.
Mr. Eyarts-wel II prccedcs-if your Honor please y
COPY of which person laid before the Committee he has
Just said that.
Judge Neon-But suppose he does say that copy OF we
paper which he laid before the Committed
Mr. EvGts-Ie does say that beg your Honors par
DON says: "hls is Mr. Mavericks copy, which copy In
person. handed TO the Committee"
Judge Neison-Is that So Slr'
The wnessYes, Sir say have every reason TO believe
1t Is 50.
Judge Neon-I you say that You had every
reason to believe that this copy Of your statement oil so
much OF your statement.
Mr. Evarts-No it was the copy made for the purpose and
which he handed to the Committee.
Judge NesonAnd which copied In the statement thoss
very leaves :
The wness-H your Honor please wrote statement ny
handwriting bed and had copied and lad the coan
CODY which Mr. had the kindness make before the
Committee laid the copy before the Committee; the original
kept myself This is part OF the copy which laid before
the Committee That ia