The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1875-09-09
District Court. sedgwick County.

District Court. Sedgwick County.
Total Docket for the regular September Term. A.
d. 1915, commencing on the 18th day of Sep
tembcr 1876:
MONDAY l3ih--lst DAP.
Il40 State vs. Krug,
1las State vs. Rutledge,
1908 State VS.. Smith.
els futile, Thompson It whetnore VS. Cook s
GIG Calvin & Co. VS.. Cook & Adams. adams
GIL Reid & Field VS.. Oldham & George.
6i2 Gill s Murphy VS. Cook & Adams.
G97 Smith vs.. Hui, ct al.
7G7 Todd & Royal VS.. Given.
7SS Tenney Morris, ct al.
sll Smith VS.. Clifford.
SIS Hamilton VS. Reynolds.
93S Rosevant VS.. Shores & Haley.
97l Gossard VS.. Page, ct al.
957 Dening VS.. Massey, ct al.
$40 Clifford vs.. Todd & Royal.
$40 Tenant Walker & Co. VS.. Howctt, ct al.
800 Williams VS.. Williams
l005 Maddox VS.. st. L., L. & W. r. L. Co.
TUESDAY, uni-2a DAY.
los Ely VS.. Ely.
1890 Hobson & Cox VS.. McMurray.
1924 Askew VS.. West, ct al.
1885 McClees VS.. West, ct al
1895 West VS.. West, ct nj.
1852 Dagner VS.. Richards
loi5 Watkins rs. TisdaIe, ct al
l0i7 Martin vs.. Butler.
1913 McClee5 vs.. O'Mealy, ct al
1857 Homer vs.. Wheeler & Scheetz
1905 New England Loan Co. vs. Ratzeil, ct al
s67 Iargis VS.. Quebier.
WEDNESDAY, l5th-sa DAP.
9l6 English VS.. Thnmas, ct al
sg1 West VS.. Reynolds.
$50 Anderson VS.. Wright ct al
500 o. Meaiy vs. Coaklyn.
93l Aldrich & Brown VS.. English, ct al.
95l Howett Lewis, ct al.
962 Kirby vs. Pullen, ct al.
973 Maddux VS.. Hoover.
1910 Martin vs. Lewis
1919 Fraker VS.. Anderson.
l025 Martin Sc Smith VS.. Massey.
1919 Wooster VS.. Mccartney.
THURSDAY, l6tt-ah Day.
1916 Conklyn VS.. Mcbride.
1918 Sullivan VS.. Waters.
1879 4tultman, Miller & Co. VS.. Fraker s Peyton.
I0s1 Bayley VS. Donahue.
loss Adams VS.. Leckly Il Riley.
652 Mailman VS. Cochran.
$50 Farwell VS. Fosselman.
l09S Foutz vs. Mccartney
1905 Hall & Wiley vs. Maxfeld.
1907 Cougdon vs.. bfaxfleld.
lies schaffer 6 Finn VS.. Maxield.
sos English VS.. County Treasurer.
FRIDAY, I7th-jh DAY.
l0sl shellabarger & Oliver VS. Chamberlin, Ct al
loss Cailen & Moore VS.. Parsons, CT AL
1897 Braser VS.. Braser.
ll04 Black vs.. Davidson.
Il09 North VS. Woodmancy.
ZIG oeheger VS.. Mahauna
Ills Dewng VS.. Massey.
1I2o Gorse VS.. Longbottom, ct III.
1l23 Lang VS.. Lang.
ll25 McCullcy vs. Zennick.
1l27 O'Brien vs.. Matihewson.
SATURDAY, 1s;h-6A DAT.
lbs Lewis VS.. Anderson, ct al.
1l29 Richards VS.. Richards.
1l30 Potter VS.. Cutter.
ll3l Staly VS.. Lourie
1l33 Threlkeld & Co. VS.. Cleveland & Pierre.
ll3i Wheeler VS.. Trowl.
1855 James & SON VS.. Cleveland & Pierce.
ll36 Moore et al VS.. Mcclure, ct al.
1l37 Stevens vs.. Johnston.
1ISS Marklcy VS.. Stewart.
ll39 Syrus VS.. Todd Royal.
lliI Pierson VS.. kinkaid.
1l42 Neekles VS.. Batichy.
ll45 Bradshaw AIeagher.
Ills Gray vs. Aiaddux.
lli9 Tulin Hays.
MONDAY, 2Ofh-7M DAY.
ll5o Watson VS.. sweete.
ISL Miller VS.. Latin.
lIj9 Sherwood Is. Mat;hewson.
ISL Herringtofss. Barnes and English.
ll6s Medlin Medlin.
ll63 Barger VS.. Lamb & Frazier.
ll6f Kerwear Mitchell.
Hes Goodyear VS.. Smith.
1i67 Wichita Savings Bank vs.. Gabel, eft al.
ll65 kohn VS.. Sheebern.
1859 Fisher VS.. Fisher.
1l12 Topeka Bank and Savings Institution VS..
School District No. IL
lllS Lanesbury vs.. Riggs.
liza McCortle. Nave & Co. VS.. Chenoweth.
II95 Allen & son VS.. Davidson.
ll16 Salisbury VS.. Massey.
TUESDAF, 2lsf-SA DAY.
HIS Hobson VS.. Massey.
llSo Mclaughlin VS.. Savings Bank.
ISL Nugont VS.. Nugent.
lIS2 Wichita Loan and Building Ass. VS.. Lamb
& Frazier.
lIS5 Burr English.
ISL Woodman & Son rs. Gabel ct al.
1ls5 House vs.. Henry.
1Is5 McClees vs.. Allen ct al.
list Hughes VS.. Hughes.
llSs Deveridge VS.. Henry.
ll9l Owens VS.. Foutz.
1872 Dewein IS. Cutter.
1894 Brickhouse VS.. Smith ct al
1875 Carpenter vs.. Daily, ct al.
los, Billings VS.. Colemanf. ct al.
1855 Billings VS.. Goodman, ct al.
100 North W.. Goodrich, ct al.
NEW ADVERTISEMENT