New-York tribune., 1875-02-26

IL be desened 10 destroy mans reputation BY veroa sand on
70 seduce female eope from her parent. house or ns
purpose OF prostitution s cnminA onensc' ousn A'
hseh be not ndctabe."
I2h Conn, 1f2 The State o. Rowley:
"Now ha, many acts which II done by an individual are
no hs ron.ory .nopa numbers . too well settled admit
controversy Tus conspiracy TO SANDER man oy cnss
child, is an ndctable Ofense"
aMass 5ss. The Commonwealth 0. Tibbetts:
"A conspiracy to charge any person WIN crime ana an
ndictabie ofense without procuring any legal process
sPenn State Rep 30 The is that OF Hood Polin,
your Honor which the action was Substantially on the e'n
Court for damages oceasone1 oy tne oonspey
In mputng party whose property bad been ouraed
design defaud the insurance company doson
in delivering the opinion Court this language;
ITO On, another in jeopardy Of Itself damage
20 him and is on this ground that It's actonsbe TO ehsie
plaintiff in this was not in Jeopardy L prosd nd
lion by Indictment he anly was not but o. being %
hjs reputation business he certainly was 1ne noei
which eopardze him would give him an acton Against
gle publisher OF Il and why not against % nc
what would be actonabie independent Of the o
hat tG Il NOT an nury rom which constructive damage results
by implication Of law. From every tori tne "a. npns'
H. implies sHN the smallest amount Of n bot sin
amount sufficient to sustain an seton ior ,s ~
SANDER coud seldom be maintained on any otnef
basis and the libel be actionabe when pubshed by one
lctOnable when published BY plurality But DO MOT re-,
publish libel conspiracy to defame oy spoken WORDS no'
actionabe would be equally subject OF prosecution W %
dctment; and then equally SUBJECT OF prosecution Dy
action by Of the presumption thst nJny ana
would be produced combination Of Numbers The over
laid in this declaration were scandalous words wen %
candaOus words spoken; and backed as they We're o
raised a legal presumption Of damage to a greater
or lesser extent Defamation by the outey o. NUMBER
na The mode Of publication is different out the enect OF
il the and il E for this reason aa an acnon hs sss
indictment would lie for IT, But an Indictment hes 'pL AZ.
conspiracy TO or annoy another-of instance !" n~
rrh OF
The next case cited is from 4h Wendell the case Of The
People Mather page si where the Court in delivering
the opinion. says:
II parties concur in doing the although they were not
previously acquainted with each other s eTnspracy u @
KENYON SAYS in King Hammond Webb; genera con
sprscy exists yOu may into general evidence OF s h
stand charged with acting upon the terms OF H. years M ,no
have been established, and who reside AT great %
from the place where the general plan IL carried on neto
that all who adhere to conspiracy afer s
and while il is being executed, becom eon-pFs'ofs
Mr. Tracy-That by rules Of the common law, gentemen
this plaintiff in this he is TO be believed IN hs 'esu
mony was consprator with Henry Bowen against the
character Of defendant under the rules OF law whch you
have Just heard read there be doubt whatever wa
10 put in here gentlemen again the qualification wnich sao
Yesterday desire to do always for do not desire to i'm
pute even against Mr. the charge OF conspiracy resting
entirely upon the evidence Of Theodore Tton make the
charge on the theory that he states the truth and that "ha
ranspred him and Mr. Bowen on the 18th OF Decem
Der what he in his evidence II Mr. bowen
should here and that hat - Ia-e MI Do"'h
should appear upon the witness stand elsewhere and say
that Theodore Ton fshes when be charges me win con-
spring with him on the 26h day December to drive Henry
Ward Beeche Of Brooklyn BY the charge Of scandal
against him. under fear Of provoking scandal IN the com
munty to induce him ghen him TO abandon the pull
pit say that Henry c. Bowen should deEy mat ana
should ignorance Of the contents OF that letter
should prepared ask you to believe Theodore lon
even against himself But upon his statement OF the esse as
he stated it, that deliberate conspnaor on the MN
day of December against Henry Ward Beecher the oo
ect OF that conspiracy being drive him out Of Brooklyn by
means Of threat Of scandal which he and
Bowen afterwards both remember in the rpare agree
ment signed statement; Bowen on his part
acknowledging the falsehOod Of those stories and
Tton agreeing in that to give circulation to them agAnout
by means Of those which there talked between
these two parties the 2h Of December they deoeaey
formed plan to Mr. Beecher Of Brooklyn there can
be no doubt II you believe Theodore Tuon But we
have shown Mr. backed eary He did not want 10
travel long in that direction found unsafe TO 90 on
But the plaintiff had committed himself so that he was COM
peeled to 20 on and be therefore compelled TO seek anober
friend 10 aid him.