New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-03-02
OTHER INCONSISTENCIES MENTIONED.

Again, gentlemen, have shown you that IN the
correspondence tho 9Th Of February 1871 Mr Beechcr com
mcnded to Mr. Tton his wife, and expressed the hop7h4
on wot hi love her with more than the Old love IL
probable repeat TO you, that man who had seduced ahoe
mans wife would write letter 10 the dearest friend OF t man
express such monsrous wish az that The fact iha nc nid
ebauchcd woman should be Why the husband should
love her better than ever before.
An this shows you, gentlemen that these parties were h''
talking adultery, but taking about these coup
Gated family transaconsth supposed alienation oi NY
Tons affections this leaving her husbands the threatening to
separate from him. anI tas business difficulty "Ach hau
become SO complicated that it could hardly be unra'eed
AGAIN. we say that it improbable that guilty man should
demand when it resisted by MS accsf9
And yet We have the word Of Mrs Mouon given IN evidence
here that her husband outraged and offended at MY
Becchcr because had demanded investigations ana you
sae how boldly even this woman makes this meet
his [chage. lie tells her: "They cannot convict me
lie tells her They may do their worst; am
going to be free" Il il probibe il he had been guilty he
would been the insisting upon an investigation WINE
his accusers struggling to prevent it'
1t improbable that the husband having reason IN gDoi
faith TO believe his wife guilty should continue without inter
rupton ocohab with her. Yet It conceded he did not Tor
six months gentlemen hut for improbable That the
wife should put writing that the husband should consent
to doing confession and charge against the plramou
and that the husband should for the purpose OF aiding
in his e1tricaon another difficulty And yet it ia con
coded that this o what they claim was her confession
or her statement or accusation whatever called was
obtained from the husband aud used touching business I'll
Guilty.
am reminded that said that he lived with his wife Two
wears gentlemen when should have said four years
IL Is improbable that the husband should communicate NJ
wfes guilt 10 third persons for the purpose Of securing IT.
conceament. 1t improbable that the husband should forgive
the paramour and meet him socially At dinner tables and
receptions and receive afeconate sautaons from MN 1t Is
somewhere gentlemen, that l. in some conversation told
Mr. Ton that the world would forgive him for having
taken back Wife All that have to about that Is, Mr.
Tton is mi sakcn said Mr. Triton in the Summer
OF 1874 and not in 70 % but in the Summer OF ~ when
he was about bring charge adultery against Mr. Beeche
said Mr Tton the world will forgive you for having
been the friend Of the you Claim to be the sedicer OF
YOUR wife IL for taking back TO friendship
the man and not the woman" improbable that the hu
band should destroy the original charge And yet they come
here gentlemen conessng that they have destroyed the
original charge which they accused Henry Ward Beecher on
the nght Of the Both Of December They do not prsue It
they pretend it destroyed We LAY that is improbable that
the most important document OF all these should
have been destroyed, it ever existed, and II
would DO anythin, but damn their present case Il presented
IL j. improbable tina; the husband should make successive
threats osre and constantly advise the pafamo1r 20 re-
main silent 1t Is improbable thar the husband he believed
his wfes guilt should declare her 10 be pure It is improba
he now alleges as the true and Original charge while he has
been confe.edy in the interim manipulating false sabled
charge against the defendant.