, 1875-02-09

e,,, o.a,rsA ,urract!on IT thsrsa, nnd by ~he tbs
Eae Courts .ho'; sla ~ aT @ VIZ" .ns wn ne aro at
prepared To hold tla because ~ hlEcgsohH 10 to D
sss isaI-stey staIc lt e4!sa ~ .nehsn IN nsap
il,c aubectnattrr. Al amendments Heth,Rne TO ttie
h and aIioxri br tbs Gn,lrt relate buck to ts tinS
ratcj H. ard part Of, tbs original Eil. And It ran.
mi nj tbe question that III" amendment ank' hat
te seselrer .a % tane,ng ~ sas s@ Ky ~
~ think that ihors Is other Aafo in!s 10 adopt IN
or nj rr ay.em of State aud Federal Jurisprudence
r1tE COURT WHICH FIRST OBTAINS 1unlsDEGTIoN
of e eonroysrsy s1a thereby .f s 'ss l. r','d Hi
"a ss,sn # h. s @ 11,o .1r ~ 'e e.tn pas,, o ~
Judgment nut hf thr asscis Of tbs tcfetlAnt i tue
arscta Withdrawn fran Tue Court by nnothnr Court
ef cDr,o TIN shJest IF te bill eau hover be obtained;
there really nDtl,lnG anut which there can V tfHs-
thu. Tho continuance. thefcfare ~ sait unsr sen
eircMr,ns wnnl te uht!cEs, Ihn nS t1el iHat
lie 1ary coil iave would 10 TO follow the property
10 Tia otlcr Court. ,u,.u
insoitcht party where hs a1c e'l in courts ni co'.
current Jurisdiction, md 1crcivcr hsIed 70 taxs
po.sssron q tbs rtnerty H. ersysf wo nv, hs*; ,M. H'
when tho cnft &ouk Jurisdiction Of tbs case' 10 Fetaln
,sA VERY sEnInra QUESTION.
It VA. tclh by tAs Circuit Court Of tho Northern
rtetrct al Ilnus In he caaa already referred t. tst
i WIS mt material that Nccetssr annntem n.s ~ "s s
Troter,y. proyi.ct lie Federal Court had tie 1rior
sIRiis 10 selzo tbs Wa think that deeisoh Waa
Ei j. el ia i" ons s' II ths cour.. lid arr]'cs'on
u.Ao fer ha aprointnient Of ltercyer, aI tao sa.u
s1'e Court md lereivcr apponte q line ls-
fure tie Krcesvcr ukoa actual posseB.ion q tho ro
erty, anasr creditor eau 10 Into a',uhcr Eonl nnse
ills arrliratfon lave fhe appointment matte, anu Wy
tson, to bs in vjulston Of tbe pr1leirlo which has
cnurt which Arnt tnkex eoenzsnca Of the CONTROVERSY
AMI incidentally Of tio res. has the Fight to proceed
aid terminate lie litigation.
irth. becomes Efnnly
QUESTION or Jun1sbIcT1oN .-
not question whether not ttc u the raintiHs
In Eerfecty statr. Defects To supplied, siiu thu
upon an application to court ot equity for relief by
n,aJs In tho i that execution was issued anil re.
turned nutta to'!a u The fact weEe fo shat dafete
es ,ugs p and 1t sn wgu 1s not asf M 80 ,s Vii, #
e s'Sn tSn ac,s Of Of ots IT, 1sa fstou ei q
i al TIA. sa bren said Il Il assumed, What vas liz
act in thia oAae, tba tbs n not 0n1y he ,rst ~
reryet Upon s PARTIES, and that they N Court
subject tu ita j1trlsetinn tfurs a1y proceeding wss
! als1'tntea !" sAo e..'u - ~ .ous. s,,.,,-r +t'k
on the rat Of tho DnnHtl who ask that the C6ttt sha
yacatg the order made in tfa ratc, that S is ke tho
case Of II ptnatns and that tho Banae principle applies
II well Known tat tho application Of thst prfncple
proceeds no further linn tha that whenever, upon
lie face Of tho record by fhs institution ut suit and
aervce rrocess It Ia shown that property or rights
to p nFcEte1 no ol.H call deal Will te Property or
thoso rights an!l II. after PERSON denis wilt tile
property, amendments MAIDS upon tho record
[ which sow that tho particular property with Which
he has dealt Is affected, Wien The oEEina record did
no at liz Ia not Bound by VIRTUE q ~ 7f'fns; be-
cause having dealt Y, good filth with tue rr1reFty.
to prevent ay thit party from dcaling with H. the
| record cattot ho snicnded 70 1T tn atfoct
h!A rights al 1t Is for the that lis In not 1t the
timo judciully Informed Of anything to l.evout Its
Wo hardly think that principle should aprly to sne
caas of receiver. It n Ptmliy n aaehtipn what
Court shall control e axscts Of the defendant In this
case nnd dlHtrtta them ninong creditors. Hccev-
er has right Of ownership III tho property. III 10
not purciater in good faith for value. lie simply
tho officer Of tie Court anl therefore IN rights Of
creditors Of r parties III any way arr tfcrtsd By
by refusing 10 al1w another court 10 Interfere with the
RI. which 10 tho hubtrut pf the controversy in tho
! case.
30 that wssh.nk, upon tho wholc We hate sltesdy
| said, that
THE ONLY sArE nuIr .-.
10 follow In mixed hJ4ein is for Tho Court which
ht.t tateH control, ntogh Il may be by m i'm
perfect b thut gtves Jurisdiction of tho cohtre-
very &nd thereby OF tho res, !s puc to maintain Il
to tho end without being disturbed by:ant otlier Court
| Of eoncurrent Jurisdiction.
weltterefore oycrruls lbs application male tore
arlud iha order appointing Receiver IN thl. CAST