, 1875-08-16
THE COURTS.
MIR. Illnk1ey Wants Ills Land
Hack,
Oponin9 1ut.ertie!d s:reat-..neoord Of
New Suits.


Frnn,!s +. HtnkIcy flsd BILL ASainst J. r.
Young, J. +. Young, Seth Wndhams. and J. X.
1lowtey 10 act anido = Hals Under execution OF
Lots 81, a2 NJ, 81 and IS, In D1oek |, Ia The Il 4
OF Jamoa Mos9nn's Subdivision Of Block 10, In
shefsiold's Addition. Complainant stacs that In
Octoncr, 1870 ,oso1d tic AIovo property to Joseph
+. Young, teccivinK a small portion Of tho pur-
oilaae prco III cash and four tru1t.deeJs for Tho
aggregate OF S4,So0 for tho remainder. Owing
to aomo efror In kha notes given by Young, they
wore given back 70 him to DO corrected, anu he
tefueed to rodeiiver them, that The trust deedo
wore not recorded mn til January IAat. In Fes'-
ruary, 1871, j, L. Young gnvc thrco noteH TOT
$o0, 900 each to j. T. Young and Sosh WadhhmB,
and ten days nftoruhrd j. p. Young and Whd-
hams began a SUIT Ia Henderson County, And OBJ
taned Judgment agssust J. f. Young Tor s9o'-
313 on theao three notes. An execution WAS IL"
sued and levied Oh Youug's property In
clusljng tho land bonght Of complainant,
which appeared 10 be o1oar in hia namo, tho trust
tueda given by him not boing thru recorded.
AZ tho execution saIa ]. X. Roulsy, q partner
Of ]. T. Young, became tho purchaser for $4,000,
and ho will bo entitled to shorlfrs dooj to-day.
OomplaInan. alleges that the giving Of tho esq.,
900 notes, tho judgment, and the salc under cx-
oc,i,ion, together with the purchase bv Nowloy,
were all acta and parts Of plRn originated BY J.
u, Young to deftand him out Of his lier on the
,ots above mentioned. Flo therofoso asaa that
tia sale may be net aside, tho validity Of tho
t1ust-dec}s bo established, and tho land eold sn-
dot shcm to satisfy bls claims.
wEAruEn.yANEs.
In Tohsuary, 1878 Gaorge r. Troadway and
Thomas J. Duffy entercd into = paftnership in
tho manufacture ut ornaMeutal weathat-vAneH.
by shch Treadway w.s TO contribute $4,000 in
tmo and altt n.ion 10 tho buaneas in lieu Of tur-
nlshing capital. Tho firm name WAS to be 7. J.
Duty. After paying all expenses the parties
wore to shara equally tho pFonta. and o. diesou.
tton Of Tho firm. Treadwaywas to bo only special
partner, mud wns to bo repaid lis $4,000, and tho
remainder of tile aneesa, II any. wore to bc
divided equally. Tho partnership conttn,cd
until May, 1914. when IL uas ssoised by mutual
conBout. II eadway fled a bill Saturday In the
Superior Court. elatiug tbo sboyo facts. and
nlieglnr thnt thnro had boon aettletnent Of tho
firm Affairs, aud that Duffy was indebted to him
in large amount. Complainant therefore
nsEed tlnt an nccount might bn had, and tho
partnership dissolved.
6TnEET-oTEH1S0.
The City Of Chicago filed petltion Ia the
Superior Court to hayo ascerla.naa tho DAMAGES
for opcpng Butterfold street from Twen;v-slxth
to Tweuly seventh. THO cost In estimated by
the Board OF Public Worka at Sl7,G30.
DIVORCES,
JOHN Wildwood fled bid Tor divorce bo-
cause his wifo Mary had surrapIitiouBlv cfs him
OH prstenso OF making visit. Joha t4inks her
visit has been extended 80 long that he would be
crusl to toar her away from hor peeRsnt frionds,.
and ho asks the Court to give her leaye to exteud
hes absonce indefinitely.
lTEMs.
A dividend Of 10 per cent was declared yester-
day In the matter of August luelves.
UNITED BTATEa COURTS.
Louisa r. and II. T. Chew. Iana G. and Na-
thalicl Willis Eliza 3. and Eleanor s. Washing
& II -.