, 1875-04-18
REAL ESTATE.
T1zs 3Cufh Park CondeInna-
tion Case
Extraordinary Affidavit Of One
Of the Jurors.
Purchase Of Property for Flre~Proof
Komes fer Workingnen.
An Important Enterprise and How
It Is to Be Managed.
The Real Estate Market Exhibits a
Fair Activity.
Money Something Of . Drug on
the Loan Market.
Ak ~ N.f
The Real Estate Market Exhibits a
Fair Activity.
Money Something Of Drug on
the Loan Market.
Building 0pezaions---A New subdivis-
ion--Hew York Real Estate.

RI land foyS --ff4k HAVING
- IT, xE ~ 80 -
'"to1s' 1o1 ~ -" 20 -
TEE 6RouFD6
upon n.;4n the moslon waa based Hera suh1tan-
tiaIly n nHoys:
p.oar,.. ~. r.r,,,+ .1,n;tt. nj i,nnrf,1sr.
aas1a- 1u-' 'aeossaa "'"As'@S" AA "1I~A>
..14c dt feadauts-
sas7*<i-Becsrse the Court excluded certain
...w - h.h.t{
ae3at @AA sounpeteNs ssaoeace o0oeo - ~o1@"A
Of the petitioners.
..,st-. - ,.;.taaa ~.
nons, aud znsIacelons c3lcuateo 70 H4s'eao euo
jury. .sre given IN behalf Of the defendant.
vaa unjust and excessive.
'.-ne.e N.e .
aGG2nss Fac Ne1shr OF e71aence.
Aua-Bec71ze the jury mrecarded the IN
,.+;,,. -. s., +ha-, ~ +hn ro,++ .,d +b~
e@ uet,o11s s-TTA ~ slGu ~ su1 Geo4t' Auu .uo
sefEsct Was pApauay tne iesolI " "a, pa0aAoat'
OF pref ldlce, or other improper motives
&er:y1h-Recxuse certain members OF the jury
x.re guilty Of irregular improper. Illegal, and
ecandaloos conduct xfter theT hae. retired to de-
f:,s .r 1e;~ ,or3;o+
1ot1.7 ot'A .aen vI4a
1t9fM-nae4use tue 14E3 "eso !nuuoaceu auo
ton improperly communicated to them after
tiley had ra,irad to consider and the verdict IVES
in psrt s.aa result Of facts or infor1nstion not
Iva1 - sr.aarca .t tha trial hut eocretlz 1rd
- s.;-; -. - as,,~-;.s+a5 - - 49, ~
sut1ep.nss1asN colamuaa39eo auuaa 20 tne 3uy. W
,sceted 10 the others whiis dehbetating upon
their verdict.
IL connection with these reasons,
Va. submitted:
to aSa T1s l. tsax so y S e &
g. in the County OF Cook and sszte Of illinois, That h
i 10 onn VandetPoea Who "1s juror in the above
emitted ea1se And further, that ute; said case WAS
Eye4 to tue Jury, md during their ceoerssion upon
the evidence the Jury After the Adjournment Of the
2aoo with The Judges private room snd the jry-room4
Ihat Dung t11ch oeaahezst1on there wa1 HnioFy
IN tie ,5ndget ro7m 70 Which Jurors hsd &C
yised y dzaf of esid vha.Ey- when aaant
dec!ioet to d. md thzt tie ohcE juror did drink Of
sa w5s5E = q 1a h;t ,aa an5ang ;gro9 the
ware n ka1d SooA certain o3 ss1d Jurors engaged IN
i1yhg cards AiEan. STATS tEa. p1aor 70 the nitro
duSor of any wtness On the part at thu datendauts
Il The above entitled e7use and after the ant1odnet!on
6so e1aslinzuon o1 no xitneass On 5ne pa1 of ne
so!.th fx1h con,sssones 1ocr q sa5d .oro1s me to
Gicat snG Sa3of1ad Elm 70 act Il foreman oa said
july but aiant declined On the ground that he WAS IN
experienced "a such matters and suggested the name 81
Jurors replied a they did not desire the person aant
20 sIsgssed for the reason that he would not b
with them Afant further states that, during the DE-
alteration o. Ee jn5J n esc Cause the crcunstances
q ths tlanooa1 P.zt conzntsetoae:, ae,t9st Cook
In this case about + 500 An a1re was awarded for i'm
proved proMrty wers discussed by said Jurors. one
=. - na41 1o1ots ..-4 ~. A4.e1 tae aeun VI 4a1o
ma inct,rd mn th ,sttr .nd keT =. ,t.,n. ~
coof cs.e Thu sane Juror stated that Judge Rogers
vas wrong in instructiag the Jury ~ to what bensfts
nona neant that the land in question WIS
Eos eu9.1ed 70 me oeoeals oensed nom
se.ti,t ~. ~ IT, .n sln ~ r. 4;se,, - -,
eondes1nsEon antt It t,at tn- renaine ~ i,s+ r.
cded the Judge hid instructed the jury that ho Jury
night ats Ito conider1tfon sneh beu.dts 1fiant
further z:ates that with the exception Of case in
sad court ted On the Monday Prior to the commence
cte US + s ,t .se s e'sa s.1s s19se, o never
jude Sho1a be informed thnt s.d ~ cod 1' ,,ae e
rrrre md 1res ~ 9rtno nnt to ~ 1ndna ~ ~
that pnrpose when be was informed By = juror that
i atlsnt did 20 do be would be iabIe to b. sent
san 10: contempt, and Afterwards that in tbs
ese1t @ H. Iaat a a1an. eAon3n eas the verdict Was
,nrat 70 49, .oI - .ht ~ =, "ua ~. ~ I uaoe 70
ID from the et.rrnr1t1 1nae tn h1o ~ -h,ra ths4 h.
would get into trouble il he notified The Judge ar il
he refused to stand By the verdict after he had signed
Tat members of the 3ur 1sed toards sf1ant pro-
~ 10 aou . angu1ge WIT s,ew o. iofeng an
-. o. G .eas s1aan1 ces1teo tnas
e,.r ersrn ;,ra ~ .srsd G,rs;t ~ ~ 4 H a e
acre AtEaut states that xfter renatuinp o1t urt1
ErdnE evening" he consented to the verdict rendered
believing that it ~ss impossible for him to edecs
ELL uo1e In 2tcofaa2ce N7fo ths s1ew& u 2taent
1.vAsDERPoE1-
i1 1a sAo ""a&n 70 oe1qls me 11as ION oa5 q
''oA = Eotar narSn p,3hr.
~rv 47-rcxr-~
-: AEef1ao~EiAs I'll
;4,e. Iena haa. 81 " ~ sA.o re monon nao
~" sh.:. ~u, ~ W ~ ~ A1n4as11
- ~. Sts wle uo was anAaoas 70 nAse
~ hio.tvi ~ aaepoeeu ", o 11o1o MS v1ew OF
.1s ,am ~ no@ .nuh IL nesessly TO ask TOT
poetpoaeMent: SILL the 4tndaT1t was. surprise, |
tna, 81. snonlo 1no Gou1t nola contrary re" OF
a1s , LAW, ne aaonlo % onngea 70 ASK Tor time IN
o!ue. 70 procure counter amdaF'ts As be un-
oe.e:oou .ne law, II Nas serted that IN no case
s1 s1s ~; !; ior ]ulor aiter ne mad return
eo lis verdict into court, to impeach the |
33:nalag-ahst IL: no eonid not stuitify himself by
o@ ~ o"n a1nd1se,-coulo nos get f1d q The effect
~ tue fesoict ne nao returned under oath by |
nek1ng counter~oath against it.
MI Lettingwel then addressed himseH to an
osnss point. arguing that the statute did not re-
sAtu naot1on 1or new tral until the points in |
"f1.1ng haa been flea In this case the motion |
nao osen MADE IN Tn1nE on the last dsy OF the |
second term after the verdict had been returned,
sna no believed that It had not been made in |