The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-03-12

oSes, tones, &C. Inc Deavy'neadeu witness TOOK
flight at these things and seemed to feel IN
feeble way the absurdity OF his position. But Mr..
Beach must have been In the worse condition OF
the two. Finally Cowley got innamed and wanted
to have naval action In the court room.
Q. Did you see them sitting together A. she
SAT within foot OF Mr.. Tilton; sat on chair; !
noticed no caress between them; thought
noticed
AMOROUs CHANCES
Q. Now give us an illustration. Can't you put
on ran an M smorsss glance for s0ghter
q. DID they look sheepish2 (Laughterl Was
the eye changed from It's natural expression A.
cannot say.
O. Can you give me any other description of an
amorous glance save what you noticed oy the eyer
A. cannot: the expression OF the eye Is only
part OF the expression OF the whole face
q. was there any other feature OF the counten-
ance, except what you stated, TO indicate mat
AIR. Triton gave amorous glances A. Nothing
That could notice; II was too evanescent; II was
quite neeting; l cannot say that he gave sweet
If MY CHANCES HAVE BETRAYED ME-.
Q. understand that you said this was neeting
and evanescent expression which you saw on Mr..
lllton's Iace' A. SAID the expression OF the
cOuntenance was too evanescent Tor me to de-
scribe; cannot anayze 1t.
amorous glances OF which you spoke contlnueP
A. cannot state as 20 the expression; the glance
was the work OF moment.
q. Now, was there anything else excepting
these amorous gances tnat led you. in your direct
amored with each others A. Yes SIR. W ~ Gu
q. what was IL? A. There were the tones OF the
voice and also the expression OF the eyes.
z. WHAT was rne tone OF MT Tilton's voice when
he became enamOreds A. observed tenderness
OF manner existing between them during the
evening; difference OF tone whenever they ad-
dressed eacn other.
Q; There was no ovemaking there. was there
A. Mono lOvemaklng there was sympathy and
a tenderness that was not apparent when ADDRESS.
my other people present
take TO Judge that MRS. Woodnuii aud Mr.. Tiltop
were enamorcd OF each other? A. From that and
also rom the language which Mrs. Woodruff used
10 me wnen speaking Of him; she SAID to me tnat
Mr. Tiiton was the nearest approach to her IDEAL
OF man that she had ever met; said 10 her that
are dear to him. she SAID, eyes. indeed, think
he does love me;' formed this opinion from his
q. Now, sir. we viii pass from this part OF the
examination. some lew weeks after, GU . Sunday
TlltOn tnere. WHAT was the conversation that
took place on that occasiOn2 A. can't give the
! Will give the substance as near as | can; Mrs
Woodruff first adverted to Mr.. Beecner ana TO his
intention OF entering into the pending social rev
preside at the Steinway Hall meeting; toid her
did not believe MI. Beecner would preside, and
! she SAID ne would preside, and she showed me q
galley proof and said he mad got TO DO ethlng
she said that iilton had spoken 30 him about It.,
Mr.. luton said that MIR. Beecner would not make
any speech indorsing free love, but tnat he would
for public discussion, and he would indorse
her right 10 discuss 1t, as far as free speech was
concerned IN the QScISSOn; MIS-. woodruff said
II Mr.. Beecher did not come out the side OF the
revolution that he would have to do so, that ne
couldn't sustain himself without doing SO; he
must either identy himself and take part with
his friends In the cause or he couldn't maintain
himself
q. When wasn't that Won first reported this con.
versanon A. Very shortly alter IL occurred l
talked with gentleman on the subject, glvlng
the substance OF these CONVERSATIONS.
Q. Who was the first gentleman to whom you
i spoke on the subject? A. 10 Mr.. Charles Sumner
first gave the facts OF these conversations. l
| IU na "a m n ar0l dna n ham
z. Next who else did you report the converse.
tons tor A.. l don't remember who else. To
MIR. Charles Woodruff; that was within TWO or
three days after the conversation; 1 gave HIM
general idea
that was long time after the conversations; 1t
was when the matter was talked about In the
newspapers; didn't give him any details OF it
then; spoke OF IL to HIM while the Ecclesiastical
Conference was in session; General Butler and
Mr.. Redpath were together At the time told
O. Who is Mr.. RedpathG A. He is q journalist,
and is the manager OF the Lyceum; believe he Is
now IN Washington; his place OF business is ia
Boston.
T. Did you report to HIM the Conversations A.
only gave him a general idea oil them.
particulars OF these conversations A. don't
remember that gave any one detailed report OF
tne Conversations until July last; wrote An ar
tice on the SUBJECT Tor q paper in which l am
somewhat interested In Lowell.
z. And In that article did you endeavor to give
the details OF the conversations A. | only gave
some OF the details; can give you the article If
you desire TO see It,
Mr.. Beach, DO not wish to see It. How did you
nrst become to know that You were to be a wit
ner in Lowell Mass, is nephew Of Oliver John
son, and one day last summer saw an ailusion to
'he sca neaa wnicn o was puonsheo'
about that / want 20 know through whose
agency 1t was yen first came to DE witness.
,nreea nave n~ dnnou h r 49, h oeneve
received notification that / would De required
ABOUT month ago; the letter OF notification came
anS came on Spre mon, sT Soe o MI
q. Have you consulted with any one on the case
since your arrivalS A. | have talked with Mr..
Snearman, Mr. Tracy and Mr.. Hill.
z. Have you made memorandum OF these con-
versationsl A. made no memorandum except
on the tablets Of nv BRAIN
Q. Where did you sayS A. On the tablet or the
brain.
q. That would be difficult of TRANSCRIPTION
would ii nOtY A. Yes 1t would seem so Hauvh.
teri
q. SO your Information OF these conversations
gwen is dependent exclusively on your general
recollection is II not ? A. Not 0enerSv