New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-07-07
DFCISIONS-JULY G.

S,oycn,e Cart Cham5ers-Bv Presiding Judge Da
US ag, @ referee Should properly have disposed Of
that q, son but the peculiar orer o irrn, SEEMS 10 no
nrnr 10 grant some aount but not able to Xix upon
prPf for s,' IL the referee stating what or what
amount claims were In controversy ucire hun an may W
Gr pa g% s' a. t r y may produce Doyle ag the
oard Of & Srhs 10 is to e jude
Davis to make explanation Mkcr az Assn %S ,t n mc
nce to It's hereafter the assessor fuse To- act IN
S@s PTg aiay ITeiy ast IIeay adayo defend
autors not day the 'i.S saIs" tp wTitt.n o am
Gaf; he charges plainta with adultery. which
; s Se ei sS @ pas hilo S'a
The case one nat req reS an orir 10, ss n 20 ay Of
to plaintiffs attorneys for extnses o iIS',SIg VIZ
AMI her & p,ore lrave 10 make further app
Office Of painn a''ors' ,c i of is dies
Snae his is not Trrmatsrs so B aItg as
TONS Of he pon + a. most onI p" nG ,9 s. an
Alternative mandands saou We of ft or iS ordered
be framed or tl upon l Suns nnt prpi &C. to the
ar pre@a Rrr was asn ao s, Of az ii s 5 The plaintiff
sne Of acf aud $40 for Tia sue Of law There was no
s SAJi he ~ c zen oat Of The JUDGMENT for costs
mistake SENS TO Pc male any the amount Of the
mistake should be deddcte the 20 ,s nIy @
eTs afcndaus attorney the correct sum aud any excs,
m.'t BE- deducted from 1s n"TI merits Of the motion
lac len. the statements Of the defendant, Lynch are
fully met disposed Of motion granted ;" 'I as ssais 70
tc oogrectness above Indicated but denied III "tsr rspss
mfh, party have costs Il notion Calntyer aSI CHA-
Motion grant i without COSTS 49,. -.
Iudee In the matter or Murray seems 10
MI, on authority That the wife may b. examined IN es pro
cerdngs; Laws 1861, Chapter ss 10 Abbott i5o LOCK-
Nv Jnig" Pray-Iooker agt. Martn.-The difference In
v,le nlocd po property be sd il great and II
IL dicut to the line Win precision between them IL
seems TO me- such Is my best Judgment, that II 5000 e
emily he given cas IL will b. enough Z" cover the d
ference TIL, amount adopted on the suppaiuon that e
arneaIs Will be prosecuted without delay otherwise
81 ,futfH may
Wright agf IioNeshe attachment must be Glscar ei bu
think all the circumstances the defendant shouI SIP
extension OF process ami yet not weak enough 10 dno
lie me- that the application for II was lhNaftSh
ord accordingly. The Central Cross town ha rad on
many AIT The Bleckerst and Fulton Ferry Railroad CON-
rany-Injurcon dssolve, opinion. -,
sc agt ia CuniaWhat stat, To the iny in this case vas
eory only and which was immediately eNpiauel on
The sciiu ,ng made real the evidence Of the witness
rrr TO In with comments ~ the defendant
conns. 1 could therefore the objection considered
award trial Whatever error wa, conitle II any was
by The expression OF an opinion ana tat AZ -g
the for the defendant, any there De-
arises from duty excluding the interviews between wit
decreased creditor d" defendant must appeal
for any tat come from the exceptions iaken
Motion for a trial on the minutes denet
.Spe.at Tera-By Judge Van Norst. ouncs ag carter
81 a-Case amendments and additional bindings settled
nv Judge DonOhue-SuttDn ast Davis, &c, ct a-Mtton
denied inem0randuin
Common Pleas-Spcial Term-By Judge Larre-
more-Gray Billngs-n"falt opened II defendant con
mi 10 refer ana take not slO to abide
reference ordered. Ia the matter Of finck-Applcaon
Granted WINS The Mayor But agt The Mayor &c.
fonway AFT Mayor. vc.-DemuTrrs cycrrei Mcrz ag
,pnN"i ,,,Ipr,t Wikin, agt Uernann-No
ton dened Comes Motion granted. Zweiz
agt Kaiser Default opened Cummings Rt Mckenzie
appointing receiver granted Galvan agt. Gilmore.Com
plant dismissed on CONDITIONS