, 1875-11-30
THE MADDEN CASE,
Who Is It That liz Trying to Shirls
fnqt1lry2
Certain Facts Long Known to Btate'a 4
Attorney Reed.



an 1ne ARne"-hsddon matter yesterday
no.ulns "se aoae oy tho urand jury inquiry
was madc Tor Judge Jhncson'a opinion on cct-
tain lonh1 que4tiohn but tbs inquiry being batcd
on certaln pop,nancr ra,o+ts. thev uere mt
fo,tho,nino Thn a,...,ns ] -, 80 H., n,,,,,.
~ hna., H"on.oa "ns' re Wv V''.ns
phaao OF tho jur7's work. whettorit waa ncocasniy
to provn explicitly that the Sheriff know Of bur
owu kuowlcdgo that the prisoner had !. yotup-
t.rlly." In tho E.nr,,stc If tIo s,atutc. ncen
A. 'afKe. Inns was not Weighed At All. for tho
reason TINT tho inry did not consider IL apptcA-
bio. hepco aI action was Waived nwaltiug tho IT.
der OF tbe Cnt,rt.
''e a. =, 'ae ~. ooIs. 49,. l. IA.
30 iat' tuo 'onst' IN fFe interpretations Oh sne
!sH, has boon
SERIOUSLY 111s1vTrHpaErED,
AZ alan thu rvtdenca ba.,re thu ,nrv. rbern ia
,'''t., s"o t"', 80
~ u'ao', s0o neseA Ia" oos"' saas ueu1'on WE'D
out Of jail on eleoEion dhv neithsr Is there au'
doubt that tho Btase's Attorney bad bcen ac-
quaipted OF the laxity Of discipline prior to tha:
d,tc ard had c,mo1.iro1 "a 1.i,,r ,to.i, In
uas.' Auu .,,.as.... Inv svps'. ~ .aa' ~ ,t ~
ooh''sfea n'n'''ii 'nAs 'uo p.oaeousos VI Aa.1"n
came TO MIN IN advance Of tae election. AUD lii
formed him TINT Madden MAS ~ large, md tbs:
hs Informed tho Jaitor thereof, and It 10 a fact
,,.'s ~
snas o4aaaou "as at.eMo' upon tue
complaint IN TIC eoff'oor* OF shs County Eush''
!ns: notwithstanding tbi. fact aud ." !h':s dam
tSat II tho healing OF the jailer before IT,,
Grand Iurr Iii hera n sst forth VA. nrnnt ara
and Iejt to tho iury to wn,k nj, pn the outside.
which WAS acco1nptishod yesltrdsy. a Juror a.
cor atued. Inv d,IIoent 1nnn,ry. tat
Mn. ngEp WAS INFoRMEp or TuE rn1y1 ;Es
eptoyed bv madden. aud d,snosol To mo ion ,rt.
er Tint tho tpfurmatloo hsd not onll bscp
49, H..
cupiss that posl,ion mon,n affsr mouth al the
expense OF tho Htato's Attornay and ths nA,,ic
had endeavorod to adjourn tust body in ADVANCE
OF Tho Agnew. MADDEN md sayorat other ooualjy
juror impaired tie tnfot1nat!ou tllst upou sum.
nonlug Of impaneIipg The prssaut fnry i'm Itst
Was short aud that 10 f,t It tho 3her.r f,,rnshei
lst, wt'ch was used, to the exclusion of o.lef
reputable men. notwithstanding tho fact thet
ths same cspscity, ~ ' '''''''' :"
The facta lu tho oAsucs-Nadder case. 40 far a.
Il has gone. without gong into details. 10. tbo
sought 70
BnrnK IT. DUTY,
md further has beop seeking soms nnbtortuee.
very natural considering it's seloctIon, to scrcou
ill., Il could b found IL she sn1ieIy shicb ii 'S.s has
been dIaplayed to uocure an tndictneut IN The
statute whlch would amoupt to yerT lttla. or to
lnd 40 Indictment at ali. which is the pinin En-.
ctah Of tho affair. Mover before Nan shoYo sucl,
anibbliug on - compIatut, and ueyer
Vas thS.o such trduat,y manifes.ed 10
| avoid m Indictment under tbo ufatonho that
| uujess ono was found tnat would stick it wss
| better tnat mono should be found, II u well
known, uuder the evidence vhIob has roached
| tho Stato'a Attorney that
MAIDEN nan DEEM OFT REPEATEDLY
not onIy before but At tho eiection. and that te
| not onlY attendcd lie pollg' but sub
se1uensiy religious services. Yet Ia face
Of ali thia Tho caao haa haen
| foo1sd With aud postnoukd from day to day on
tho ground that i judicial opfntoo VAS hTaitod
upoU which to form An Indictment, To say tho
least such delay Ia uuuaual, and thereby tho
| State'e Attorney has oopfesscd an ipnorabco