New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-04-20

that was not until the Fallthe scandal you mean
published thngf
cation Of IT, but may he mistaken.
O Now, intermediate the card Of Mrs Woodruff and
that t had got out In any wayi A. Thst there was
difficulty between me and Mr. Tlton, heard had got
Q. From whom did you hear that A. cannot say
q what did you hear the dsHcnlty was that had got
QUIT A. That cannot ssy-merely that there Eas talk
anon, H. ana saa, 'aes T,e rn0rt a1ct n heard
O. Did You ever hear Of the difficulty before the publ.
cation Of in the Fall Of 1877 by Mrs. WOodhullf A.
O. Well in general did you hear it from any quarter
A. Only that there difficulty that all
q. Had you heard that Mr. Tion charged Won
with the commission OF this offence A No; not that
q. Do You recoIlcct Of receiving letter from nephew
OF yours, r. u. Perkins A. Yes, Sir.
Q. Do YOU recoilect when that wasi A NO. Sir; but
Mr. Fillerton-I0ok and sec, please. Tho wlnes--I
have got ii down here somewhere referring 20 memo
Mr. Beach-Thai letter Is on exhibit
Mr. shearinan-Exhibt ID. 49,
The Wness-Wlat datei
The Witnoss"1 81 that Is too Ear along.
whether IL il the letter that You received from your
nephew Handing letter 10 witness A. presume II
o. Look at Exhibit d. ~. and see whether it is your
reply it A. This is my handwriting yes, Sir. untl
you get over to here this think Sir Is the FIRST drai'
O. Howl A. l think this ia the first draft of letter
=.
. now are you not enabled to soy yon heard of this
scandal in 1871, IN February A No III.
Q. let me read clause from your nophevs letter
Theodore has been iustifyng or excusing his recent
| ntrgues with women by alleging that you have been
detected in the like adulteres the same having 'ech
! a. You are referring 70 the Bowen lettert A. -.
q Did you understand It a. relerring 70 d 1e po"c
~ alleging that you have been detected in the like
] "a a.
O. Bowers charge had been hushed upi a. Certainly
! O. nov had they been hushel upl a. SO far as Mr..
! Tulon concerned, he had ceased to believe
directly By MIR Bowen except by being
whispered in his car they hal never gone into the news
papers nor, that know OF, into the common arr Ilsy
al worked around ia the various channel. winch an
2uorant Of by which ncWsiG'n erl noiH "I NM. ,
q. How had they been hushed upi A. Ihey h'a been
q How A, didn't say how.
Mr.. Eyarts-He didn't say That.
Nr. Tuilerf0n-No but he b. Soy ~ 80 now ,
! The wijnossI am saying aow thai d'u't know DO"
q. You did not regard thi-. then reference At 81
TO me charge against you ~ MI 1t'hi a NO. d. 'o
o. Wen. LET ia sae YOUR rrr'yl
Fob. -. l.7l.-Whatcycr Mr Tiiton formerly SAID
fhe Witness-Plcasc read on.
"What.y 1r. Tron form 'r'y said ag2!Hsi meant 4
know the substance OfIt-he h'- Withdrawn
T. Nv prior TO That NJ Tuton had charged Won with
Improper relations with his vic, hd hr NOT A Ihdt
w. not tho .llqrc, n,.~. u Mr. mo" anu NC
Mr. Eyarts-Read the whole sentence.
And frankly confessed that ne had been mi-cd by me
statements OF one who, when confronted, backed down
from he charges 90
Mr. Fulle1oL-I know what the sentence H. 7 VIII give
YOU great many more tI4u yVu want before get
/ through.
/ Mr.. EvaFts -You cannot.
Mr. Fuicrt am glinc - AJAX questions in regard 70
J this IN detail. q,
NJ. Eydrts-But propose when the witness Is asked
concerning writ IN ft,r. that hall S-uiehGe shall not
be PAT 10 Linn as ii IL were whole snitnce. .,a mn.
Ar. FHilerton-I did not real hall sentence ana put
/ il to him as IT, n a whole one.
Judge Ncil,Jn-Iou have right to frame yonr ques
tion. o..
Mr. FrIlerton-I have that right, and win criov IT,
ITO tine Ufncss1 Will ask this question it' ddu-
"Wnatef,r Nj. Til,on formerly -a.d ae1ii-. ine-dud
know the substance OF It-Ir ua- witLdIsiNu
Now ask Won whether prior 10 the date Oi TINS le't'r
he had not charged Won with having had inpr"p r rei-
lions with his wilcl A. To SIR Fullerton - cannot
auswcrt hc truth without making statement besides
! - uLll