New-York tribune., 1875-01-27

Honor frequently betta 10 70 begin with
what he did communicate 70 Mr. Bsecher.
Judge Nesonwe have some evidence on the SUBJECT
already
Mr. Evarss-It IL slready in
Judge Neilsoa-Yes: now sppled 10 these persons
Mr. Eyars-We don't want more brought an unless II 10
brought In legitimatey.
judge Neson-In regard to persons yon have named
Mr. Bvarts-Thst h. whatever passed between Mr. Beecher
and this witness concerning any Witnesses separe
from what sslready introduced suppose might be legitimate
evidence; but that not the point Of the present inquiry
Mr. Fuertonwhat object bad you in view in replying to
those people the Produce Exchange who acooed you and
questioned you in reference 20 this scandali
Mr. Evarts-That we object to.
The wtness-To give Mr. Beecher character for purity
Nr Beach TO the witnessl They object You should not
answer.
The wi;ness-I beg pardon.
Mr. Eyarts-Your Honor heard the question:
Judge NeisOnTes Sir admit it. and you take an e1eep
ton
Judge Neison-He has answered.
The Wltness-i have answered.
@ What idea did you mean convey to these peopef
Mr. Beach, would IKE 10 have the answer resd
TK TRIBUNE stenographer read the answer referred 70 a
follows: ITO give Mr.. Beecher character for purity
O. You used appropriate language that purpose did you
A. Yes, Sir
Mr. Evarts-Tha object to- The words he used are the
words 70 be given in evidence
Judge Neison-You have got It.
~
evidence and ask for statement BY the witness himself
that he used words appropriate
Judge Neilson-As he understood t.
Mr. EvartsI understood that but your Honor how does
become subject Of evidence when is what he sGid ths; you
jury judge Of and take The witness construo
tionf
Judge Neilson-we will take Il.
Mr Eyars-I move to strike out the answer.
Judge Neilson-Dened.
Mr Eyarts-We except
Judge Neilson-PFoceed
@ What passed between you and Mr. Beecher in regard to
what you said what you say any persons, who
caechized you the subjecti
Nj EyarsIhal object to- they have examined him
about il
Judge Neson-I think that s proper applied expressly to
any Of these gentlemen whom you have named.
Mr. Undoubtedly they viii take M Duck or Nj
Swan Mr. Baker
Judge Neilson-Yon need not lame him.
Mr. Evart-There is the poin. your Honor please
Judge Nelson have named them all and the answer OF
the witness should be applied to of those person
M Eyars-Now your Honor please i. not permissible
this apply the past evidence asnmentau'ey 10
these people That Il his affair What Mr. Beecher said to
him already testified Now he has any hing more
that Mr. Bcecher sld to him concerning these particular
cases. nc nay now be enqurcd Of undoubtedly upon
the particular cases having been brought in by us
But that is not the effort The effort is not 10 give
anv new fact concerning Mr. Beecher but 70 apply by the Wit
ncss argument statement some previous statements Of MI
Bcecher 10 these particular circumstances.
Judge Neson don know whether they were previous and
general or not
Mr Evarts-I be guarded ans. any such cOasequen
ces II each Of these cases be put the witness and It If
said What did Mr. Beeche say you concerning what
said or what you shoud say Nj swan itst Is question,
possibly admissible.
Judge N,son-I s 70 be expected that the witness
cond have gone to Mr. Beecher aud said him, ~ had
ycraon with A. and told him So and with and told him
and go"
Nj Is FOR supPose what could and could
not be done.
Judge Ne-onAr Fullerton, VII you proceed think there
is line proper
Mr Kvarts-Tberc Is inlt, 4 yoar Honor please
Judge NesonNo doubt there Is limit TO Nj Fnlertonl
You must have idea.
Mr. FuertonI have distinct idea and that idea Is shad
owed forth m my question
Judge Ke-onGo in respect 70 any Of these persons
named Ou the examination,