The Albany register. [volume] (Albany, Or.) 1868-18??, 1875-10-22

the Willamette A ditch from the Canal
west on Front street carries water to the
Farmers Warehouse, the saw mill and Al
bany Foundry. Another ditch running
north, ON Lyon street, carries water to the
planning mills of Althcuse 8 Co. and q.
Carter s. Co. and Chas. SIMPSONS ware
house. Another ditch running north,
down Broadalbln street, carries water to
the Democrat, Jas. II. Foster s. Co. and
r. Cheadle.
Friday, October ..
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET.
Following are cases to be adjudieated at
the Circuit Court for Linn county, which
commences Lext Monday:
Thos. Monteith ct al, vs.. J. H. Foster ct
nj: Action at law to recover money.
| VIM. Harris VS.. VIM. McCalisters Ac-
/ tion at law to recover money.
John Lu ct al, vs.. L. Elkins ct al Ac-
! tion at law to recover money;
Andrew Willy ct al, vs.. L. ElKins et a
/ Action at law to recover money.
J. B. Constable vs.. Ruel Custar Actaon
| at law to recover money.
i VIM. M. Pitman VS.. Wilson Bump. Ac-
ton at law to recover money.
Hampton Weed vs.. NJ. NJ. Hart Actlon
at law to recover money.
Jos. Hausnan VS.. d. A. Reeder; Actlon
ut law to recover money.
o. Fox & Bros. vs. Jas. Cunningham
Action Mt law to recover money.
O. Fox Sc Bros. vs.. S. A. Fann1ng Ac-
ton at law to recover money.
Geo. Houston VS.. j. B. Keeney Action
at law to recover money.
Mary Watson VS.. VIM. ). Smith Action
at law to recover money.
Jos. Teal vs.. A. f.. Hamilton Action ac
law to recover money.
Albany g Santiam 8 Co. vs. S. A. Nick
4 ersOn Action at law to recover money.
Harriet Curtis vs.. Hiram Smith and w.
w. Briggs Action at law to recover mon
ey.
e. S. Mitchsels vs.. Ratcliff; Action at
law to recover money.
: VIM. Falley vs.. A. q. Sears; Action al
law to recover money
Edward Rubaits VS.. e. N. Beach ct al
faction Mt law to recover money.
Rachael Wilson vs.. III. A. Davidson Ac-
|, | ton at law to recover money.
Rchsel Wilson vs.. NJ. G. Malson Actiog
at law to recover money.
Jos. Houck VS.. g. j. Harrington Actor
: at law to recover money.
w. H. Dodd vs.. G. j. Harrington Ac
tion at law to recover money.
Dana Lewis vs.. VIM. Miller; Action a
e law TO recover money.
Jas. Kinney VS.. j. e. Bently ct al Sui
! equity IOF COIlLlftLIGiO0 Oh SllCF1H SstI6
Gllerst Myers g Co. VS.. John A. Gore e
y al; Suit in equity for confirmation of Sher
i. IFS sale.
i The Board &c Commissioners, &c. vs. Su
san w. Thorpe ct al !; Suit in equity to fore
n close mortgage.
VIM. e. Newhouse VS.. Vim. Peters ct a
1f Suit ill equity to foreclose mortgage.
Caroline Briggs vs.J l.. Hatcher Equ
:. ty for possession of land.
a Mary J. Needham vs.. J. L. Hatcher
equity for possession of land.
Adolphus Briggs vs.. j. L. Hatcher; e6
y uity for possession of land.
t. Adaline Briggs VS.. j. T.. Hatcher ;equit
g for possession of land.
os Jarvais Briggs vs.. j. L. Hatcher eduit
for possession OF land.
le Emiline Briggs vs.. j. L. Hatcher; equit
r for possession of land.
E. III. White VS.. Harriet Balch ct al eS
uity to remove cloud from land title.
"a ~. Smith vs.. Vincent Watson ct al
IN equsty to remove cloud from land title.
Ludlow Maxwell VS.. Elias Maxwell (
Z al Suit in equity for partition.
re Vincent Watson VS.. w. j. Smith ct al
r. equity for partition.
!. Vincent Watson vs.. W. J. Smith and n
'e Viola Smith ct al equity for partition.
a. equity for Partition.
- Luther Huston ct NJ, VS.. Thos. Boggs
y al; equity for partition.
" John Waters VS.. NJ. II. Beckwith equit
or for partition.
% Is. Froman vs. Coll Vancleyc ct al e,
70 uity to foreciose mortgage.
~ Mary 6. Butler VS.. Preston Fields ct a
equity for partition.
Henry B. Springer ct al, vs.. G. N. Wa
I'd ct al; equity for partition.
.is H. A. H0gIe ct al, vs.. c. r. Hogue
- al; equity for partition.
81 Jennie Grubb vs. G. w. Grubb Modf
lis cation of decree.
IL Board of School Commissioners &C., Y
ot I. A. Riggs ct al; equity to foreclose moi
op Rachael Miller VS.. VIM. Miller equity
%. divorce.
Martha J. Phillips vs.. Alonzo Phillip
mr. equity tor divorce.
Matilda Lathrop VS.. Philenlan LathrOl
an w. g. Lilies vs. Rosa Lilies equity
RI divorce.
- - Sarah e. Chapman vs.. Jno. NJ. Chapm
~ equity for divorce.
ge Thos. -Clemnens vs. Martha CIemmeI
Ty equity for divorce.
.os Lucy Daugherty VS. Lewis c. DauGheT
70 equity for divorce.
,ur Peter B. Settle VS.. L. C. Rice, Sheril
ng Action at law to recover money.
,it. A. J. Houston vs.. J. G. johnson y
I. '.~ for replevin.
he y. NJ HUT vs., Josiah Mulkey Acti
bis at law TO lecoyer money.
ith JURoRs. Following are the jurors dra,
ld- for the fall term of ofCircuit Court which ce
The venes In this city next Monday: w.
M Ecrsn Thcs; Alphin, GEO; "; ls;i,,I KluIn " "
II Mccoy, Z. L. Hill, N. G.. Mcdonald, T.
- Mack, S. J.. Archibald, Jno. T.. Rector.
i. Cowan, Ostin Dastin. Jno. B. Har1
Th0s. Turner, B. Miller, j. B. Fryre
or Michaeis, N. j. smith, s. i. Biodgl
"a JAS. Riley, B. Holt, ChAs. Lewis, Emo
'.s Miller, w. II. Churchill, g. W. Cowan,