, 1875-05-05

WA9 QqxE ChIlGl. llU 1HNtt1Hn khR& T1knn II
With John Swintou in tl,o Tousaoi rroces,lon "o"
Stenhsn pearl Andrews wsx ,,ert nsilci h,,.
tho Court allouruo bofora nnvshiuo in,,,ost "t "ut
WAS elected.
FACTS ANN Gossip.
TINE et .,xrr,ssss ce,,rnH.. nNc 1oo .,.a
o'1 rrxs' 1s''1"AA " 'hs DE-
Nm yoyt TSmt: ,,o,,
ali their robut,al iost1mnny rn iho ~ cdpmi pati ~
week. The roas,nn thav nirc ~ hi. s sxonni,'
chaugs Of opi,,Io from ti'st .tnr.sssi ,tani
ago ars that there il hardly anylug s for thon 10
rebut 1lIav nrnfcas tn IL s.;nni.ist, - ~ ~ ~
rnpt coso o Tia nYours ~ ~ 1ar t "fons .. Inc a.;
claim thst In fact Mr nnocl,er. ."so, nn,,,'aa Mu
havo urotlnoej h,t .in1In ,sftnoa. "na '.Nsdr
Deocher hiulsolf. Ths tsati%ouT nr IN ,hc
othcrs. thcv snv rithor nn,n,,n,.t ~ ,nt,,tna ~
Tebuts iissf Foy arro !" t,s ~ vas aa1G TGG ao "r
fonse, through Gcn r.nv'a omcn,,,g Av nsv.v
rromIaci In imne. n, sfrs Ain,o ~ oa1a1,
sn sb on the mornnv s ~ nno 70 es,aois
mail by liz sae un pcrnoms. au TO n1or s fa TiiSx
read to Doacon samno nr1cer Al, of Mr. iTa MI.
toms confession' md ,,,,t r. w.u i;r,it,d ~.
proasions Of respect aud aoctlon for ier uas.or: M
s:link In tho consntacy." ' and ,ba. AS thu .
plaintiff did not III" csi, hin, nv 11,a Sha' ou NV
testimony looking towari tba hs,s hi,o,,nennt sy
| OF tic alibf VIVA tbht OF Mr. ncachor A..
Moultop svore that bo vas viii 1A hs, aa,r. 'nr.
s the forenoon Of juno and TN air III 1,cechar o"n
claimed that L. WA viii Mr kiusa. t;,,r' IL"
orn;u of tat ay % rnnant,n1 III mhoe. o1i @ anls T.; INC
gard to = card which was published In W tic Eaalc
tho sand 10 corfoborato th;s statemou a ut ut ar G
Doeohcr lirnsef complotoly rusot tlo ilockm.,i
charasa on sanitation Bro.hor nh aotaa
teasliiel That what Ts!ton road 10 Lin was ' not
Mrs. Tilton'a confession but tho "trna ,
Neither Frank Carpe1ter nor ii. O: novcn u, has
boon draruaI forvars M conrnirator. '|On t a naa
sense, md Mr Oarponter, It in uuIerstooI, viii N
bo Qua Of tbo pri!,cipal witnesses IN rosnttai III
Gan. TRACY. IN bls ona"t"c ,,1dross M eousiai, e;sn
charged that, avt,en the. plaIntinf iorna th"t
tho lns nj lin ,nnnccnt via w"rn ,,n.n"i"a Nv
fore the tribunal wbich iin Ind ,cr"ntaI snJ M
that atlo was resolved upon throwinr on tI,c
incubus OF her l,fe. to suoak froolv In s,bnio
trush, he made haste to Choose a triounaf w1,sro
tho law would kcen lar tl,,mh a,,I -" ~ ~
e,lnpressDd." Ths fnctn la % ce,to;riv not inr,a
out this theory. NN' 30''o
Htripped Of All extrennoua .d,urcta +,,n a.-
fenno bit iu amounts. connset far liz p.,ntsfr M
vsy, to iust Lhfs :. Sirx. Ttnn fsii T., iopa wi,
NJ, aud she {oycr did anythinn tn lns nm knn.
Of hor lows but ourLt 10 hnyc forn,I II mt !,
Law tn revsrd to rsbt1op estl,nnr iii mcn ort ,nS
thona to Contradict, thoy vii be- ohlteeI n rans
tont themselves WITH tboir case AZ ahev msde Il
on tho first examination. They otsIm thas t IN ~
comnlgto Tina n,,tnhor of tl3eir irton5.,i III
neaaep will he Tnntcri.iiv rcdur.I a., n.ti
FLORENCE Tiiton nnI .avar", s'tho~a ,.o nIs.o.. nS
bnen nnmc ~ rrns 'h1a w,tuassns r;i "v naso
II aot 10 oaiiel ~ Mr, Mne Ttou WI IND pGS'yq. H.
ocsRos in 1shM,tni ,rd so1uo 'tw tuo, ,1siPaa PIX VII
viii ba mt mon lin stanS I'M AZ HI taat;t,,s
Of each vii, necessarily H. v"rv a,,art t", Xxx
be rapidly iisposgd o. Mss ioveIoy rant,"rx pt Nv
WustoI soee Iudeeo 'e no pn annnt 10 @ to 10
made ~ cioar IT. 'fIitor'. ni,s IN ue
persons cast upon It by tho datnupa NJ n0 axcon a
through the snaechns N colosc3 n. H. osEups sn,
sions ~ too fryno: V5 ~ r. .Ss1n r, vso y. asos-
No further cuieavnr wi, he mia 7, ,co,Irna,ot
Con. Tracys storv of tho ri,narv ~ atcna =, ~,
scandal. Counsel ero gsrcasticnIiy serpro ,,nnn u
tho Gsuoral witncss nay cisss Isssiu H. ap pei
mud add that nnv nttnmnt IN iI,ur nnrI ~ roi,nt
Il would onry be ryinr to Il ~ irnnrton.a tonus
which Il does uot posscssa @ e''ADe'
rnE sl,,t-nrnrrrrA1.
tbs COUNSEL for ths dsfoHsa nyo1oss w naI;as Ill.,
that thew iaye mad. out cnsn w,tci' in n,.,a
lutely without defeot. TLev .ny thai thav i.oi !,
large nuu,bor Of Witnesses ia rosorya' wl,om a
being pccossarv tay siisnenred viii 1haIn ,rtis
yiew to saynr Tina Es thnr vii ha nii,,a,'
only to robut thn Tohuttal their WI r..sa" ,.,i
necessarily be fev in n.,,nhnr. Mr Toociat %'+
" ~ "nwps 0As'
Ssv 1,oyt Su". xays
Mr, Ti.on was With bis fswyers in copsultat
tiou. and tho question OF calling Henrv a HmWsn
WAB l0tfCuUGGA, hkrs ll}kUu bNiIf ~ If AIR Hn,y.
on eau be wItness ut ali caij him- ia ,,,. nv
fIll permission to testify to nii that hs kuoyu.h
Mr. beach aud liA juniors opposed tho snbntn1,-
ing Of Mr.. Bowen until he would accord 10 than
tho ordinary privileges Of eating . syllabus OF
hia tuatimony boforo 10 won. On tlo Witness
stand. They said tl,at ii Mr. Bowen would only
impa1t to them enough Information to naa,st
them In questioning him, tl,oy would not leni-
tate to call him. lii, Norris vss doleeatol Ia
visit him, and offer to him every atIyan;uro nos-
siblo, It ie would ouly follow tho practical rmic
Line what ha was abio to tcll. "" WV
. III. T,ltou argued for Mr. Dowou,s admission. i
sayIng to lis lawyers: III can't conceive tbat
Ill. Dowon knows any moro about nv casc tl1.m i'm
hayo told him. aud that IL yory Ii;tio fsnt svan
II he can only tostiry ~ to what trsnsniroi1 I'M m
tho night o. Doc. 20. whon ha tnoi nv ts,to,t -
III, Doecber lot Llm 40 on tl,o sts,,,i an III 4
The pubIic ara c]a1nofine for him afd .ny n"t ~
him On, pus Mr.. Wooihul on anT mt asy ey.ru ~
body ol, who will tell tie truth" Wv
lii, Bowen las not yot rocslyed A suhnonna
and il doubtful about Eet.Inr nno. ia ~ ia
coasultstiou with hlp lawyors md cotss,a @ % ~
intimate fsiontls "a to lfa best CONRAD and thsv
10 faE advlsed him to adLots tn t,p trinn,titoo
ooyanant, although, once undor tba oarnsst soo