The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-04-08

the t1al oil SAID IWeed Indictment eNlQencc
money mentioned IN the schedule marked "A annexed
such hity items the sad tra seyeraly found
thereon s rendered against MIN aceodng q
And this dep9nent further saith that The said Tweed
rendered any verdict on the trst trial Inat the said
casons, ana that the said tweed was not offered
on e sehs either q said trials 6 ,a
trials ~ explanation o. or concerning any money re-
alleged connection by him with any Of the sums
OF N he d shea iS armss
was commenced about The close OF the month next pre-
a. such elsetion the said William NJ Tweed was
one Of the o,ets II The CIV and county INV q New YORK
but this deponen Is informed, by general report and
said william NJ weed did not offer 10 rase his seat
can't for iwo Whole SESSIONS Of the Leglsature
This deponenI urther saltn hat Richard .. Connolly,
and Peter swecny who during the year 1871 was the
city have botn long Since departed iron this State aud
are now as this deponent is informed and believes u
orally. And from ali the acts aud CIRCUMSTANCES which
concerning the actions and doings o. the said William
NJ Tweed in respect TO the transactions mentioned IN
said comp amt and In respect to his connection with
public Affairs this deponent has good u neleve
Tweed should by means be liberated from hls said
viii mme aintey depart from the stato 81 New York
and seek an asylum in some place beyond the reach Of
This deponent further saith that Immediately after the
were made by the ATTORNEY General arrest Ebert
Woodward formerly an assistant deputy clerk Of the
New YORK, but that he could not Be found, and hatR
Sef dgen search s e s Il in9r a ana h
limits OF the state OF York and concealed in such
THIS dephnent further saith that at the commence
the complaint there n marked schedule al which cor
responded in all respects with the scnelule marked
cept that certain Miscellaneous small warrants not in
10 be & % s g sre
out reducing the total q such schedule from S652 81
And this deponent further saith that the schedules re-
spec lively marked Il ana II TO tile affidavit supjoned.
copies OF schedules respectively marked and
which were anne xeS 70 sad ,ormer ana
and marked schsdu.e = true copy q an aihiav
IL said former acon on he 2itn day d October ISL
before sn & mo nory bS by
complaint mentioned in such affidavit the complaint
speeI1e 0 S %
sa rd nd hh were 80
the said former complaint
afdavit Of sad liden and the said former complaint
necessarily with the Clerk the city and county
New York a CLERK OF me supreme Court and now re-
TINS deponent further saih that tue SAID Ricnard B.
OF the said items mentioned 10 said frst mentioned
schedule for having wilfully neglected t. audit
bail in small amounts amou lting in the aggregate to
less than $20CO) BY judge 81 the supreme Court who
hath since been removed from office tor malversation by
ne Court q imprisonment and ssid connolly having
WAS not further prosecuted on sad indictments =
OepOnent iurtner Shili Ulut since OCTOBER, A.
1871 james II. lngersol, in schedule A.
presented IN several for crimes IN respect TO
warrants. made payable % Or Endorsed 70 lnsersol
Co. mentioned in such schedule - aud also in another
Issued on behalf OF the county OF New York payable
Of the claim aud is allowance That said later m
OF jury Of oyer and 1ermner The city and
county, o. New York. in the. year 1873, and
prisonment IN the State Prison, where he Is
counsel lie actively engaged on behalf OF the peO
pie n all the eases elyiI ana criminal IA ms aidayt
aforesaid investigating all records books ana ransac
with the transactions mentioned in the preceding copy
complaint an ne moneys therein referred 70 as hay
comp aints ana IT'S schedule referred TO ami and
nent hath good reason 10 beeve and does believe that
all the claims MENTIONED IN the schedule marked A. an
tous and fraudulent were all known % be BY William
made up by he directions OF siid Tweed and
Watson in n pursuance Of itaud1lent conspiracy
schedule mentioned, mat no one OF such claims
tne weed Connolly and Mayor Hail
acting togetner and that The SAL three persons never
except On the one occasion mentened IN such com.
numerous conventions ana controversies that have
arised and been moved concerning the alleged frauds
asserted Or pretended, according his present reco
eopy 81 s chsd Mns ie n e sa l
passed upon at any meeting q the three asitors aore
subscribed and sworn to before me. March 70 1875,
EDAUND Notary funuc
AFFIDAVIT or STEPHEN c. LYNEs
ciiy and County q Nes Iork ss;-stephen g Lynes
that the year 1853 until late in the month 81 sep
in the County Bureau ia the Finance department the
city q New YorS. and was 80 occupied therein subse-
portion the accounts pro es-edy
oSe We're srsscee from sa eee 81 somc
person o. persons unknown THIS degonent i "a.
marked A annexed 70 q copy o. COMPLAINT AM was
Bureau, in the Department OF Finance, from which
Ths opponent further saith that his duties required
his constant attendance aurng the time Aforesaid N the
of part Of them a. Aforesaid he in the performances 81
his duties had frequent access e and saw The vouchers
were made and he thinks Il improbable that any Of
scrvaon ana from familiarity with The said vouc
thus acquired this deponent salth that, according
none q said vouchers he accounts connected
claims regularly ami IA duc course presented tor allow
ance IN SAL Finance Department a. = required ~
o. the Finance Departme u winch are a. me following
materials furnished services performed must he
derel n the TORN pres rlled ~ me SomuTolcr aud
and the ordinances 81 the BOARD Of SUPERVISORS That
o. tbe bis "a ~ Inc trgth n ihe s.toness t5"rein en-
tanned q the materials alleged q have been inr
The depoeent further saith that ne was aware q one
May, 1917 mentioned " TIE preceding copy complaint;
buthe this deponenu never heard and docs No believe
acted ogether upon any aul gr examination o. any Of
And this deroncnt saltn tnsi from his constant
tendance IN tho County Bureau of SAID finance Depart.
ment AM his - familiarity With the proceednSs Tor
toe allowance and payment 81 claims axaius. Tue
county ~ Nem i2se' s'ls my Fsti ~ Is
board q special Audit any actgn togetncr III IL
OF claims had tlSen place, he On. deponcnp would
have SHOWN q \ a. Or about ne tine q =. occurrence
knowledge ~ formation nelirf any recort wutten
trace ~ said finance Dcgarm NJ W q any action 81
SAID eoard 81 special Audit except tie minutes ~ their