, 1875-07-27
officn Probably tho people can find aomnbof|y
to suit thsm untaido of both those gentleineE.

officn Probably tho people can find Homnbo1y
IL suit tliom ultaido oE bo.l, those gentlemen,
Ihe thing in poaH,hlo.
$rcond-Io benefit himAelt. I,nt lin. could
only ho AccomplishG! By failing after election to
fulfill tho plcdRo Hnfie before eisc.ion b7 going
hack nn tue plutnise un which his election ~us
accnret'; Does slr. Ashm mean to 10 anything
If tflht kfn13
Jhi'ti-Io henont the ceopie. Bus Mr.. Re'lm
need not teck f"r = ue's uttto for this ,eason.
Iln now occupies All niticc tha. II pnIco Snpcr-
shte'rie1t. IN which he las Amp'e
,nlI"rlnnlsy 2 to work ali tho gouti
aAo that to tho tnhdA u aonlo Tho deeiro lust
now exhibited to Lcnetlt tho tonple IL sudden,
hnd has hut heretofore hccn jtrceivat1e In tho
adninstrhtiun of tho oIlicn OF Police t;nperin-
tsLaont, wherefore alE. Hohn fails 10 e1esnpify
hns, laytnR asido thaee things. seek In this
communication To MAXI ouly u1!o point against
Mr liehnl's proposal. IA" point Ii 4 legal one.
promise " candidate fur Office. In considera-
floh of receiving votes, to give money or otlIor
valuat!o ttnbg either to Hi individual or 10
tue public, il nithin tho h!rit of tho laws
aeaihat sribcry AMI a'lcl promises, veil as tho
soseh thereby obtained. aro vol, ~ against pub
lie policy. A Promise by a candidate to tho
Eote'B al largo to lcIfurm The jutics OF tue
ol''a Tor lesH tiian tile nalasy n4ed by law In
within the same pri1'ciplo, sud all votes obtained
~ H!oatIh thereof Will ba itjcctnl Ly the courts
n Tho COUNT. In support of there propositions
cite tbn caso cf tho Htatu e1 rul. Newell ~.
Pusdv, Hupsemo Court Of WIno4itBiu, reported
in tho american Lao IhJtsar fir tho inouth
u February, 1875, at page -. IAs uan All
act on In tho nature ot 9nt uarra N L1onglt
tu determine nlich Of THE PAT tleA wa en.lted 10
the ot.iee u County Judge of |rrnun County,
MlH AZ tho election the telator rtcelsed ,1j1
yolaa, aud ths defendant 1,2l7 ynt+s, BOIL,
partIca cleimcl to to elected both flied tho of-
licial oath hnd bond required by uW. aud the do
frtI1aut WEB In posseaslun Of Aud pcrio1 uuv tho
usieP Of tho office. Il,8 gr,lind upon which tho
defendant denied the right OF tho teatot to tho
ulGce WIS that he had published npsce to the
yuterB otfol,nE to relfnrm the DUTIES Vi tho uf-
slce IT elected fur ff10 wear, aud salTing the
Bainry Of 100 year attached IT, tia nl!ice by
law ; and tnt lD0 voters had soEeI fny linn be-
ca,lso OF suct notice. Nho wtilnut kail not,cn
would have voted fur the defendant. lilo Court
aay, inter a1!a:
Wien elections erase to EXPRESS the freo i.l-
trs wltun they shall 10 cuntrolIei. materially ht-
enctd, by *cutliaEy Offers nade by the cantlti trs
whether to tha elect"ra or to the municipality. NEST
vital conditiu OF frue KoyeH rpt will g thrr.afJt
Tho tenteucy might te In tAc, ID ian;s frpul
tho public service al who will not sy for 1r1vi-
lrHs Ut being employed therein. and to all with les4
acrurulouE, hnd y" sef"re ess trnst"ntsby aud d.
fetving men. Eleetaons by the lboIAe NIGH. then
rcase 10 c1PreaA tho Tres and unLlAatd Judgment
mud will of the people, hut might In controlled l,y
mereenlry consideration, either public private,
lin contsmpt. 30 far - WI adv,tetl M }udct.,
tribunal In. given my couutenutlce wAsteyur a1y
practice or act which ten,ta IN tha! drrction hut thu
foHr1 hnse steadily hrId that PoIlAr elections tut,st
!c ke FREQ FROM my taiut Ut corruption. Ne would
INT hold that man tnsy buy public Office Just he
wUuld buy lnrBe It auction, that is, by Offering
lay more fpr u than any other nersun Ia willing ~
ay. VIC can never give tho sanction Ut this CuuEt
doctrine 10 II rnlc!ot*.
And tie Coart found for the defendant.
1uuH CALVIN WAtLIs.