New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
CHARLES STORRS RECALLED.

CHARLES STORRS RECAlILED.
Mr. Shearman-Charles StOrrs.
Charles storrs was then recalled behalf Of defendant
and further examined.
BY Mr. shearman-You also present at the arbl-
tration Of April 3, 1921 A. Yes, Sir.
O. Will YOU examine this paper Exhibit 122 being the
written submission OF Mr.. Bowen and Mr.. Tilton, and
state whether you that paper before handhg
paper to wtnessf Z A. No. Sir.
Were YOU ever informed Of the existence or the
tents Of that paper in any manner before this trial A.
No, Sir.
O. Were you ever before this trial informed OF the ex-
istence contents OF any written suDmssioh
about Mr. Bowen and Mr.. Tiltoni
Mr. Beach, object to that question
Judge Neilson-It is covered by the last question:
think he may answer
Mr. Beach, should have objected to the last question
il had not been occupied.
The witness-No. Sir.
O. Mr. Bowen tcstifies as follows with regard 10 the
arbitration Of April 3, 1872:
The arbitrator gathered about the table, and were
about to proceed when l interrupted them by saying,
"Tlo matters between Mr. Ton and yourself" said
that should decline taking one step until II was put In
writing what we TO submit, and suggested that one
of the artratOrs draw that submission: and finally
think Mr.. Mouton took his pen and said, "Gentlemen'
what do you submlti'
Did anything OF that kind any part OF it, take place
in your presence or hcaringi A. No. Sir.
O. Did you that evening leave the house In company
with Mr. Bowen and Mr. Clafn A. And Mr.. frecland
O. You did A. Yes, Sir.
O. On your way did Mr.. Bowen request any OF you gen
tlemcn to obtain for him the Woodstock letterf
Mr. Beach-Obectcd to. Your Honor has already ruled
that out.
Judge NeilsOn-Yes, matter OF form. 1t is ruled out
Mr. Eyarts-YOur Honor will remember that Mr.
Bowen against our objection. was allowed to TESTIFY
about the Woodstock letter when he was on the stand
about half an hour
Judge NeilsOn-It was to meet what had been proved
by you that subject.
Mr. Eyarts-Wc examine this witness to meet what is
proved.
Judge Ncilson-Then some else examine some
other witness No. think will stop at this point. 1t
is very remote That letter ruled out 80 we
do mt what relates to. II may have been an In
yitation TO dinner for all We know.
by Mr.. Shearman-Wth whom did you go 10 Mr MOui-
tons house on that evcningf
Mr. Beach-That Is objected to.
Judge Nelson-Ie has given an answer on That SUD-
ject. He has been examined on that subject.
Mr. Shearman-It ia for the purpose OF meeting Mr..
Bowens evidence. Mr.. BOwenthcy brought in on his
direct evidence this matter Of the written submssion
Judge Neilson-You show 1t so far you can.
Mr. Shearnan-We propose to meet it in further way
by showing that the three arbtrators were absent for
about half an hour
Mr. Beacl-This written submission had nothing TO do
with the companions with whom Mr.. Bowen went to
that arbitration. 1t is a totally immateral point.
Mr. shearman-Our purpose Is to show in contradic-
ton of Mr. Bowen, that not only that did mt take place
I'm the presence OF the arbratOrs but that there
interval in which Mr. Bowen, Mr.. TiltOn and Mr. MOu
ton were together in which, If 1t occurred 1t took
place.
Judge Neison-You may show that they to-
gether.
BY Mr. shearman-Dd you not so that evening to Mr.
Bowensi A. Yes, Sir.
and Mr. tl,ara
A. Yes Sir.
O. Did you leave Mr.. Bowen. Mr.. Mouton, and Mr.
Tilton together to go to Mr. Clan'si A. did, to go
Mr.. Clafins.
@. You went to Mr.. Clahn'si A. Yes, Sir
@. Did you 80 for Mr.. Freeandt A. found him at
Mr.. Clafin's.
Mr. Beach-we had all that in the prior examination
BY Mr.. Shearman-IOw long were you, Mr. Cafin
and Mr. Freeland, away from Mr.. Moultons house after
the time you left Mr. Bowen. Mr.. MOultOn and Mr.. Til
ton therei A. should say from fifteen to thirty minutes
O. You took the Woodstock letter to Mr. ClaHin'si A.
To Mr. Bowen
O. Delivered 1t to Mr. Boweni A. Yes, Sir.
O. Did Mr. Bowen express any surprise on hearing IL
Mr. Beach-That Is objected to-
Mr. shearman-Mr. Bowen testified on his direct
animation
Mr.. Beach-NO he didn't.
Mr. shearman-He said it was a surprise to him when
he received it,
Judge NcilsOn-I think we will leave that where IT. fs
am afraid wo shall have admit the letter by and by
II we deal with 1t any more.
Mr. Evarts-H your Honor please, we resisted their
calling it out Your Honor allowed it, and pro-
pose 10 contradict him.
Judge Neilson-Yes. 1t allowed, because, during
your testimony that evidence referred to- and ev
dence given in respect to tf Mr.. Bowen demanded 1t
on the occasion OF the arbitration.
Mr. Eyarts-I am not now complaining OF it's having
been allowed.
Judge Ncilson-It was allowed simply to meet that.
Mr. Evar,s-I am not now complaining that 1t was
allowed but IL was against our resistance.
Judge ilson-Wbatevcr they have given the sub
ject was to meet what you put In.
Mr. Evarts-well, they have brought 1t out on their
part-irect evidence Of their rcbutting witness. Mr.
Bowen-new evidence brought into the case In rebutaL
III IL has anything do with the matter II Is part OF their
rebuttng evidence Of their rebutting witness
Judge Nclson-w Well IL came up In this way Before the
arbtratOrs the materaty OF II first put by you In
your evidence that the papers were spoken OF to be
burned tho Woodstock letter excepted They put In evi
deuce by MI Bowen his views 10 meet that. and "a
mart OF that comes the fact that although was not
sDoken Of on that occasion 1t brought In sfterward