The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS.
ALBANY, N. Y, Feb. 10, 1875.

DECISIONS.
The Trustees OF the Town OF BrooEhaven VS..
Strong Knapp vs.. Hardness, Union National Bank
Of Plltsburg vs.. Wheeler, Alexander vs.. Cullom,
BoardInan VS.. Gaard, HAYES vs.. Robinson, Reid
VS.. Reese Fisk VS.. Fisk, Crane VS.. Genin, Parmen-
ter VS.. Roth Uwo cases.. Penny VS.. simpson,
BesscnaIsheg vs.. The People-Judgment
affirmed.
Railroad Company Bookstaver vs.. Jayne.-Judg.
ment reversed and new trial granted, costs 10
0,s.eal vs. The New York Central and Hudson
River Railroad Company.-Judgmen OF Sutreme
and Cosnty Courts reversed and new trial or
dered IN the County Court, costs to astde event.
In the matter OF the application OF the New
York Central and Hudson RAver Railroad Company
to acquire lands. &C., vs.. Armstrong, Same vs..
Jones, Same vs.. Graham.-Order Of General Term
dIsmisslng appeal reversed, with costs. and pro-
ceedings RENTED Tor nearing and order OF Gen.
eral Term, reversing order OF Special Term.
affirmed with costs.
The Chapman Slate company VS.. Sutcline-Mo-
ton 10 dismiss appeal denied, with $40 costs.
Krom vs.. Levy.-Appeal dismissed without
Arthur VS.. Griswolo.-Appeal dismissed with
COSTS.
MOTIONS.
The People, &C., and Edward A. Frost Vs. John
II. Wilson.-On mott N OF j. G. Cocnrane. OF csun-
sci Tor the appellant, it was ordered that the cause
Set down for argument March "a, 1873.
Daniel S. Chatfield respondent, vs.. Calvin Frost,
appellant.-On motion OF Mr.. HlScocK, OF counsel
Tor respondent, anu after hearing Mr. Parker ior
appellants, 1t ordered thai the appeal be dis.
missed with SO costs OF this motion and without
costs oil appeal.
Genet Vs. characterization to dismiss appeal.
Martin !. Townsend for motion; George W. Miller
opposed.
Calvin A. Croninger and Another, respondents,
VS.. Lemucl L. Croker, impleded, &C., appellant
On motion OF Il. Z. Sprasue. Of counsel Tor ap-
Iellant, and after hearing N. G. Moak for respon.
dents In oppos ton thereto, ordered mat the
order here olore made herein dismissing the ap-
peal be set aside and the case restored to Its
proper place ON tue calendar and all proceedings
subsequent to sucn order OF dismissal Ne set aside
appellant TO serve tie printed papers herein
within five DAYS alter the service OF THIS order and
to pay 10 respondent $40, COSTS oil this nolon.
Krekeler VS.. Retter-Motion to dismiss appeal.
T. d. Gilbert Tor motion, IL. A. Frost opposed
Court took the papers
Codding VS.. WOrmsiey. --Moton t. put cause
over the term Notion denied and cause set down
Tor argument on the 25ta INST oy consent.
Rodman NJ. Price, respondent, VS.. erasmus d.
Keyes impleaded, &C., appellant.-notiun to dis
miss appeal. Ashbel Green Tor motion, James U.
Carter opposed.-Thc court took the papers and
argument Of cause was postponed to 18TH inst.
The Ontario Bank w. The New Jersey steamboat
CompanJ.-Moton Tor reargument submitted.
GENERAL CALENDAR.
No. 1le. James br1dgiGrd, respondent, vs.. Leon
ard l.. Croker, OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES resumed
aud concluded.
No 10. Horace May, survivor, &C.. respondent
vs.. Clark d. Page, appenant-Argued by J. Z
Cochrane, OF counsel Tor appellant and by w. +
COgsweil FOR respondent.
No. l3l. Christina cesar, respondent, vs.. Alder
Karutzy.-Appellant submitted.
No. 1872. owen Hale, respondent, vs. Alexander
G. Patton ct al, appeiiants.-Argued by Il. f
Bullard OF counsel ior appel ant. and BY Martin
Townsend Tor respoudent.-C4se sun on.
Adjourned 10 Wednesday, February H. o
ten A. M.
The day calendar Tor WEDNESDAY,, February II
is follows NOS 1873, no. lis, $780, so. 81, LIS an,
/ III.