The Manitowoc tribune. [volume] (Manitowoc, Wis.) 1866-1878, 1875-07-01
CIRCUIT COURT.

The June term OF tins court cOmmenc-
ed on the 22d day of June, and court
was opened at 10 o'clock A. N. of said
day by proclamation of the Sheriff The
following is a summary of the business
disposed of by said court.
Horace B. Ciaf1in, VS.. August Roberherst-
The attorneys for plaintiff not being present
when the case was called, the same was contin-
ued for the term on motion of defendant.
Jesse Scholl, vs.. Benjamin Jones-continuei
for the term on application OF defe ndant upon
payment of $40.
Maurice Murphy VS.. Horatio Truman--contin-
ued for the term application of defendant
upon payment of $10
Henry Greve VS.. Fred Gauger-trial by jury
jury renders verdict for the plaintiff and
assess his damages at S44.80.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Peter Peterson
affidavit for continuance filed and cause con-
tinued for the term.
The State of Wisconsin VS.. Timothy Donovan
defendant appeared and withdrew his plea of
mot guilty" and plead guilty of an assault and
battery, whereupon he was sentenced by the
court to pay fine of $50.
State of Wisconsin VS.. Gustav Banmann-on
motion of the district attorney the court orders
this cause to be discontinued.
State of Wisconsin vs.. Louis Peterson-ca
continued for the term.
State of Wisconsin VS.. Peter Ferdon-The
prosecution having failed to make out a case
the court directs the jury to render verdict Of
mot guilty.
State of Wisconsin vs.. Fred Levenhagen-
Order filed appointing ]. D. Markham, Esq, to
prosecute this action. Cause continued.
State of Wisconsin vs. ]. P. Heinrichs-Affi-
davit for order, and order changing the place
OF trial from this county to Fond du Lac fled
State of Wisconsin VS.. Cath. Boldus- Contin-
ued for tie term on application of defendant.
Same VS.. Lewis Lawrence-On motion of the
District Attorney the court ordered discon-
tinuance of this cause.
Same VS.. Jas. Noble--Defendant withdraws
his plea of mot guilty. and enters a plea of
guilty of assault and battery, whereupon the
defendant is sentenced to pay fine of $685.
Same vs. Geo. Albright-Ordered by the court
that the Clerk of this court enter discharge of
the recognizance herein upon the defendant
paying fine and costs amounting to $29.16
Same VS.. jeremiah Murphy-At the sugges-
ton OF the District Attorney, and by permits
sion of the court. nolle prosequi entered.
Same vs. William Lehmkuhl-nolle prosequi
entered.
Same Vs. E. C. Hasse-The prosecution fail
ing to make out case, the court directs the
jury to render verdict Of mot guilty.
Schuyler Powell vs.. Hugh Morrison ct al
Order yacating Judgment and order of refer
ence fled Judgment filed.
Vitilanc Sanfrachi VS.. Angelo Sanfrachi-A
Judgment of divorce filed.
John Mullins VS.. Michael ADMINISTRATION to
dismiss the appeal herein. Hearing of motion
G
Juliana Huebner VS.. Ottoman Schallern-In
this cause the jury renders a verdict for the
plaintiff, and assess his damages at S275.T9.
Franz Pech vs.. John Oswald-The jury, fail
ing to agree upon verdict, was discharged.
John Hucek VS.. Wenef Hostak-Judgment of
foreclosure and sale filed.
]. F. Pritchar6 VS.. Ed. WeinSchenk eft al-De-
murrer overrrled with leave to answer in 80
days upon pc yment of SO, costs of molten.
Charles lander VS.. Edward Zander-Stipula-
ton of discontinuance filed.
Fridoline Gerster VS.. Bartholomew Hilbert :
Motion to vacate and set aside order denied.
Elizabeth C. Van Valkenburgh VS.. Lawrence
j. Conway-Continuedf for the term on apphca-
ton of the plaintiff.
State of Wisconsin VS.. John Hoewig-The
court directs the jury to find the following
verdict: 1--WE find the defendant guilty, and
impose penalty of six cents"
George Bauman VS.. Joseph Kuhne-Order
dismissing plaintiffs complaint filed.
E. B. Treat VS.. Chas. Lawrence-Ejectment.
The court directed that verdict be given for
the defendant.
J. r. Barnhart VS.. Fred Schroeder ct al--ver-
dict was rendered for plaintiff for the amount
claimed, $32, 90.
Geo. N. Woodin VS.. Frank Drucks-v erdct
was given for the plaintiff.
]. A. Loomis VS.. G.. Torrison- Ejectment.
The court directed verdict for defendant.
A. II. Behrens VS.. Ang. Bruss-The defendant
not having put in answer to the complaint,
Judgment for plaintiff was entered.