Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1875-06-08
Iraer>oa outhc vc.-her
AZ GSDAN

IVA one 10 The cIarriet .N~
Mhot the genius az COD .-s.a llw-
Inc Wlnd may al. twenty wayS
y tefuie u cannot blow
IL nay blow rorth, g stan IS warm.
% south. 70 sii'l iSr,cai,
NT east, d smells use clover farm.
or west, no thunder fear.
RosE MASSrY'S SrTroT l. .ss 49,, v.,5,
~ =" tt' f.r E.-srf n T'ra..i.-.f fFg-.sf -.
SSNefal months Ago Bose Massey. the wei
N t1NA acircSS. Ssct Fc2ry J. Mann far
Nj Mann was arrested. and U-ss s,,,riit'.if Ia
oali IN >l".ope, Mr.. T.rlC,iora Moss hsinr 49,
$3.50, i .f MIS- Massey supported ncr COM
I.alnt win humorous eNcceiiuglv a Election
ate letters written TO her by Mann wbcv 10
was the unSucccSsful manager of n London
theatre and her accepted suitor r., Them a
day for The wedding was frequently 81 b,f
Mann'S business Troubles a. often aroSs =,
demand \ poStpoucment. Lately tie has hoap
acting Ia Wa'lacls under the name OF Hr-lry
j Montague, and has become a tavorite vita
the public In certain parts. soon amor the
answer Of Mr.. Mann was fici. Miss Mas
sey's lawyer. the Hon. Edwin n. Meade
summoned him 10 preliminary cNamina-
ton. and iu retaliation his counsel. al, Hon
A, Oakley Han. summoned Miss Massey IN
similar proceeding. The day for uaf eN-
ahlhatlon mas frequently Uoeu postponed.
yesterday being the last DAY appn ntei The
parties have not aS vet appeared personality
I'm court, and yesterday thriT LAWYERS al
joumcd indefinitely a q Time of tho cXa-,i,-,-
non, each ore reScINing the right u select
any DAY IN the future Ipoa giving five days
Both Miss Massey ard Mr. Mann have
been an Ntous for a compromise and ril., -.
i rfobahlN &mtcably settled though IL is r.of
known Whether tie former relations If tho
parties nave hccn resumed. Rumor has how
ever. announced Mr.. Mann'S cnra-pr,cpf 4,
several fashionable ladies.-N y. San, IN.
CAN nRUNKEN MFN RFoovERe-M.hfie
We must condemn man who sets drunk
We must also Svmpat livp with ms t:,uniiN III
he i injured drunk while he Is holding >ucl
policy OF insurance ~ il dpScr. bed in th.
following extract nom the Albany Law
Journal "A policy a. insurance IA suit com
tained condition that mo claim shall ~
made under this policy where the death or
injury may have happened while tho in
SUrcd was, or in CONSEQUENCE of his having
been under the influence of Intoxicating
drinks The insured was accidentally shot
while Intoxicated. by n companfol with
whom re had been drinking. TIE court he
low INSTRUCTED the jury that there could be
80 recovery II the shooting happened in con
sequence OF the insured having been under
The influence OF IntoXl eating LIQUOR: bat that
uc question was not simply whp ther he WAS
under the influence OF intoxicating liquor a.
The time. but whether the iniury occurred in
consequence OF that-whether the injury WAS
the natural or reasonable cause OF his being
IN That condition. The court, at general
term, however. held that no recovery could
| he had n tiie insured was i'm the condition OF
ihtoNlcatlon, whether or not such condition
nad anything 10 do IN producing the injury
Mulltn, L. J.. who delivered the opinion
| said; The cases thai hold that the insurer
| must show that the relation of cause and af-
| lect exist between the Thing prohibited aud
tie death or injury, have no application 70
The clause under consideration a IN avoids
! liability OF the insured was i'm q certain pro-
hiblted condition, without regard 10 whether
| ~ had any agency I'm producing death or in
| jury"