The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-01-19

then has IN reality no existence ana Is void; tnat
the Court cannot put lie into nothing and That,
tnasmuch as re nihilO nihtl dt, he motion to
Vacate the assessment must De vacated.
THE NEW GRAND JURIES.
The composition OF the grand juries is an I'm.
portant element In the prosecution OF criminal
offenders. Before Judge Donohue, IN Supreme
Courl Chambers, the grand juries we're drawn
yesterday for the next term OF the courts OF Oyer
and TermlDer and General Sessions, Douglas
Taylor, Commissioner Of Jurors, assisted
by Deputy County Clerk Gumbleton and
Under Sherln Cumming. conducting the
drawing; a. From the names gwen below
citizens are on the list the following IS the list
o. the oyer and Terminer Grand Jlry:1Davld }.
Whitney, Reuben Ross Jr.; Eugene Dutilh, George
H. Moore. James S. Warren, John Sloane. Charles
Curtlss smith Ely. IT.; James g. GriswoId. William
Bayne, John HERMAN Alexander KNOX. H. b.
Lane. Edward Cooper. Peter Kembe. Jacob Adler,
wynkS9 ,otso 0hares + Soaaan William MI
Z. A. DuYckincK. A. p. Montana, George q. Fisher,
Pierre Marie, Isaac Bernhelmer, P. R. Green. John
Spear. ]. Hampden Robb, Leopold Eidliiz.
William Wood, James l.. HASTE, Isaac r.
L. Resented. E. J. 2actarias, f. Il. Parker M
H. Richards, Jacob Freund. !. +. Duckworth and
Jury list comprises the following names:-Geoi 90
@. Williams, Elisha Brooks Jonn jacob Aston, S.
Vim. N. Johnson, James a. Hearn. george q. Kel:
loga, Thomas Hicks, u. NJ. Turnure, Lewis May,
James O. Belknap, sheppard Knapp, Jr., l.. En-:
Eeatner John I. Agnew, j. Russell. Charles ..
Peet. VIM. II. Knoepiel J. 2. Mccarthy, L. D, smell.
James Galatin. Jr., Edwin Doobs, Robert Nor
rison. Charles hopkins, samuel Derrlckson, John
Buckley, Jr., Henry j. Nlcnoas VIM. e. Rider.
John Stephenson, Samuel Wetmore, Joseph A.
Jameson, Matthew GARRISON, }. A. Sunderford, e..
S. Delevan, Frederick ii. Chaplin, Henry Erben,
Alfred Leaman, Joseph Alden, j. Plerpont Morgan,
Francis FL. N. Whiting, John S. Rice, Louis Sper-
Ing Jonn Lowry, Edward Tanning, ]. L. Seixas.
and Maltby q. Lane.
THE MARSHALS VS.. THE SHERIFF.
Judge Joachimsen. OF the Marine Court, In
special Term. has delivered lengthy and very
exhaustive opinion as to the rights Of the mar
shals OF the Marine Court in the execution OF
judgments issued BY the judges Of that court as
against the claims OF the sheriff, that all Judg-
ments shall be directed to him or his specials for
execution. The opinion dlscrminates between
such judgment as by statute shall be solely given
to the Snerir and those when, emanatlng from
the Court, may oe executed by their officers or
city masshals, and on this point holds that city
marshal has the same right in regard - the tax.
ing Of personal property as any sheriff. THIS, 1t
will be seen, somewhat conflicts with Judge
Judge JOachimsen in his opinion-the points Of
which are only given-hOlds:-
First-That a junior judgment creditor can attach q
prior Judgment and execution only ON the ground Of
Scond ince the get OF 1874 relative to Marine Court
can be enforced only after filing a transcript in the
County Cierxs office and reg nar u, uon must be
Thrd-An execution on 9 Judgment not so docketed
Fa~HA junior judgment Creditor cannot be allowed
to avail himself OF the objection This right belongs to
Fhh-An irregular execution may be amended in
every respect on such terms as the Court enforce
the taking Of personal property as any sheriff.