The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-05-08
NEW YORK HERALD, SATURDAY MAY g. l875-TRIPLE SHEET

Then there another idea pervading this principle
WHEN y sousht 70 % establshed ana thal wa inas
follow up that idea is enormty he hoped. per.
were those here Who think ne Governor, can % n9
wrong and he wanted u understood that he spoke ~
the Governor q today, aud not q me Governor
q KY Ns9rs sinse VS. fierIea y W. ~
all these powers winch ~ Is now sought 70 invest MN
that Convention snd learn what was me opinion the
neope AZ mat ums ne believed theN would not now be
stNnalng here asking that the Governor DC renNesteI
Win these powers. He referred g The act mat ile
powers without hay.ms them clearly denied ni WIN,
have heen " ions NAV Nh no, KS out III ther
hanns their power over heir oelas le pe9ps q
other STATE officers lie tfeu read ToW tEe constitu-
one provision the constitution "a that The G9yernor
thai none q these alleged canal frauds could have oc.
eente9 hseaa ~ eomne ON here and asking ior these
unimed posxers 10 not LEI rs he said throttle h6.
srt order 10 DO what can now he done under existing
everything they dear life secure seligovern-
that which the coonists sacrificed much 10 secure
our segoyernment Il is claimed" 10 said that
tins was 50, why force the bill upon him
upon Governor il he does wantlt He read
me Gy as tne organ e ace a
wanted not was not the question here II Is our
asa for such biz no Governor dad and was
6,sstaee 10 'hf 1smottac parry 10 p1 n I'M soh He
pointed the difference between the proposition 70
ihs one ii The ease OF the Mayor that Official had The
q e ou mo enoT was
10 yield this controins power there was no a ic
had the power 81 appointing elerk q suoord!naI
lie then proceeded to discuss thr provisions q the Ds
lie asked why there should De any % d srer
by the senate and allow the state Engineer ana Caah
removed il Is claimed that the latter are spending
ofcias hut thew are not cent can go out
n the reaury without the signature OF the Comproer
be tried BY the senate aud others not mhat an ad
ty-a preposterons ae5ufdly Agan'r ~ - s tn
Governor political representatives Yon take senator
pnriiy hlms lie said il seemed 10 him that House
oughlio adopt the senate b rs y aad come mere, Il
provides tor ri- ior an inea!Patea man ltglS rs MN
tne rsht y an open trial ana n9t enc ~ Star ona.
Der ne gentleman rom ,9n T., nI, 5SnuySh Oh.
pssu y on ~ sani tommissioner r. charged Win
h as ana VET heease II Mil coz soaefhIns 10
have ne truEh thar e1eense must MOI be inearred
cinzens must be dseraeed 6eraue ,orsooth i WIN cost
crime was enttled 10 trial even the meanest tibet
ne referred g ne time when the government o. Great
the King attempted 10 deprive obscure ciE.n u the
that d Great Britain can thus u shaken 6y an attempt
to deprive eitzsn q one o. ms naienaoe rlths he
law which sIrps our high state officers o. the nght Of
4 lie acain urged he House pas the Senate bill
con H.. nena him he Could be tired ~ the senate and
IN less than month could DC determined whether he
Nj. seward and Nj. T G. Campbell followed in the
The committee then rose snd reported progress.
Mr ALyoap moved y make TIE 9iiis me special order
Recess 70 four o'clock 7 NJ
he House reassembed at four O'Clock ? N and in
committee resumed consideration Of tie state Officer
Mr. hDsoN spoke in Of ne absolute Removal bill
system Of government lrom its foundation recognized
s he g"f % he u ne e n e
successive steps taken BY the people through their sew
Amer discussing The provisions OF the several bills
Semmifes SHOWN lu az he Waehner bin pfoyding or
trials BY The Court o. Appeals should be passed and
would place these trials as beyond the influence OF
his done. he saidif this Innovation 10 oe
made-he was wiling 20 yoe tor thst ein JIG ae
republican. Il was true hat he had acted
was aio as K aid that mat party Vas founded
on & ~ sron Tsnk ~ he rsnnbcs s
party were dem9ct h hey s there n ana would
jolnted cohorts q modsrn democraey
OF Mr. DAILY g substitute the Absolute Removal Dill was
Inc question was then on Nj. waehner's motion to
adopt the bill giving the power Of suspe nson 70 the Cow
Mr HrsrFD was opposed % mis- bill as be thought tie
Court Of Appeals had enough legitimate busne
teni Ne in Of the senate bill spoke In
advocacy o. ts proyisoas
In the House Mr. DAILY moved to substitute the Also
lutte Removal bill Lost-sl yeas TO q nays, As fol-
YsAs-Messrs Barkev Beach, Broas, Brown Camp
bell , Cooke, Cosgan; Daiy Davis, pessAr, Ecson.
gan, Hoimei. Ives, kenasdy Kshipka Lewis, Hackin.
Aerwn; W: Miller Muller oakley . 0,keeie Roscoe,
WItbeck and WurZ-T.
NAYs-Messrs Alvord. Badger. Barrow Bennett
Bishop, Bordwel, Bowen. Bradley; Braman. brogan,
Cak.us. T. Campbell. Clark. Cleary. CofFey, Cole,
Omstock Daggett Decker, lay. Gallagher Gedney,
Green. HsnrahaR Hepburn Hess. hinckley, Houghton,
Hussey Hustled W. johnson. keenan,. klrK, lawson,
Llybndge Lincoln. hcAfee, Page, Peck, Petty, Pier
son. Pope Prince, HANSON Reilly. Rich Russell
ford, Schenck seward, sherwood Smith. the Speaker
Staev staue irues q iayier IewkseSry IremIsin,
more Wills ana IOst-6f.
1ne senate bin then ordered third reading.
Mr. AIvoRD asked unanimous consent that the bill be
passed. and The oAI was passed-yeas iO2 70
against lNr. DAVIS. The following absent did
not ;-Messrs Bearusey Benedict, Berry, Burns
Christopher Farrar, Pream, Friend, W. a. Johnson,
Kraek, Law Lawrence, MCGOWAN AeGroarty W. Nil.
Ter, -cuddcr. sherman, shel. slingerlAnd, TalmAge
w. T. Taylor West and Worth.
Adjourned until tomorrow morning.