, 1875-02-14
THE DAR ASSOCIATION.

WAS, On motion OF NIT. E1UdY. mHde tha knAcfA
| or,1or f,- RI. 5,o~t ,tu,..r raat;,
S'oe1 .ol 'no AeAt 'esa1ae neessbs"
!: | In ths courae OF tho dacusslon upon the sub
j ient Mr. Jamca p Root aaid ha xaa n1roan,1 +.
i, ! "SS e'1o =. was ofpe9oo v
too a5tat'on o1 the queatlon OF the cooa Of pFac
| rice and plaadinca nutl ha considerer il nnuiet
| s, -s;s, ~. ,,,.-;. :, +ho 4a....:a. !
| W ~iA1so .op eaeee1ou III sao assocsaton.
Mr. Withfow said It was contemplated to strike
i ~ '4o"o'so
simply to abolish distinctions betUeen forms o.
.u. ra,,,.,...,,,, .,x ,,..x,r
ALE ~oA"11'1E ~ Apaiss'oSss
to whom were rccommitted several names at tht
.1.". ' 1opoea 1a.ou5n 4soo'f. ne1'ey
! en31 @oey sa" NO reason 10 change their former
recommendations, aud, with The exception oil
ME' Aseszinges' VINO LEO "ashora"n hla name,
the Committee recommended the admission o1
~. 1sos.. o' ~ Da"e,' Ano "A.e1'nAu'
4ue COMMITTEE mo1eoset' tooA OCCASION 10 o:op
hint that tbc7 uut3eratood tbair br,siness and
we're in the habit O, attending to il f.i.hfulv.
Gen. Smith, slso member Of the Committee,
clinched the matter by rem&rxinc that the Com.
| mittea did not relish the ,;nnntatinn thak aha .
did not attend to tier duties. ~ '' '''
i a aEARauaEsr WANTED.
! rules offered the following:
WHEREAS, The Supreme Court bas rsceotIv decided.
in tha case ot Hall W. Hamilton that w1erp he puts
to the record shows that the Court Wis held ~ moro
than one Judge oi The Circuit or Superior Court OF
cook County tnat there Is m error which furnishes
sooo KtoGno n tos tne sesefsaa o. Judgment. nniess
| anch = nj. r1f ~ ~ ro~sras ,mn,t ~ ~ ~ s
and ~ IN .hs eonx ~ .ne. ine
adoption a1 tue Consultation Of lso and also 10 sub-
vide the Clerks ocs ct each court into many parts
there JUICES, aud to compel such Judge - iry All
causes eo:nn eneeo neofa an "a he wsso tne sole
19ags, taersoy producing smesrr..smanss IN sAs ad-
! ous character md ~''"'' - 0'' 11''' 's@*"
! VHsKEAs. rhat mart Of ths ouintoo vhfch .s.erta
nion Of oiter dct= and the question having
Supems ~; onars WI! allow 1ua argument, snd prota-
Wy Ill.,. pIsa9n h ~ ,ns oeon n oe
to present peiou for Trarxumeut. With consent Of
the part;es and counsel in lie cause and aak for a
aarI5 consideration thereof. ->'@ ~~' -
lt<so'sf That The Judges Of the Csrent snd snpe-
raor Court. ae Eesieefay re7u:sted to continue fur
su ,nsS,n. s t ~ sha M .,
that tEa saprstns Court viii alhere to tha r,la Lid
down.
Mr.. n. Il. Ring uoorel to strixe ont tho list
resolution a. hn 1Id M: beliaya Il nroaer tn as
the Cook County judeoa to dia,ecari = tiecision
or tl,e Supreme Conrr
Judge brutYeIl Thought lit would Ia we'll tn
have tha rognIut;nn thn,onoh,v d;scussaa Ha
oppoeei tho ror:ion Of The resolutions Which
snercsted a dj.recard of the d.c,a,cns az thu
Sunrema Court nnd which reouea:e eti tia Ind1ea
to fellow . particular course II action at yart-
anco with til. rulin.a of the S:,nrema cnnrk Ha
n
Mr. ", Il. King ala3 smoke glrongly aeainst
the resolution and hnped il wanfd ha atr;ckan
ont.
Col. Black tbourb. that the preamble sbou]d
feusire manner.
Mr. Moses aJso denonnced the resolution and
,,rcn,niie ~~N~ ~
The amendment To strike out the Iaat resolu-
ton was theu out aud carr;eI.
Col BLACK moved to au1ond tho preamble by
;.ss-.:.- -. -. s.-..t.-. - -
ycrsnr son,e of the dacjs1nns" faeteat, NJ y will
hsra ] Ii,s sffcct of royerainr n,ost NJ 1ha aecsa
ions"
Co1 Wftherov rnoved m ama,5rnant In tha |
anandment by atrik1ne ont tic eutira nreamhla.
Dir. Goudy vas in favor OF amendIue ,ho pre-
on1he h1,t ibonoht Il wonl1 ha ,.rcnu ~ NJ. ia
= entirely o,r Ia fhopeht that hi Rlacks !
arnenrn,ant won.d cover the whcio ground.
Iuaoa D;ckev .yresd viii toa forSnnr ana,tar
He tnonrht The striking ont of the nrea1nLla /
wo,ald enflralv n1utilato Tie uroceedings.
Col. Witheroy thouyht it would be wisdom II |
s,r,sn "nt 't tne nra,TnhIe hecanss tha Snnrsns
CI.urt mtcht deem it offensiTo.
T'hn nmendment IN tha ampndnornt-to strikn
mt ti,s rTesnhIe-Was then mt snd doc;ars9 str
caTriod. tie vote being 10 ayes and IL ooea.
'rhn onestion than cams an tha rasoIntion
seves.i arnendmeuta vera p,oposed.
judge D;ckey moved 10 refer the wto1s puh-
was nnt and Iost.
The 6rst resolution was than nus to = yots.
md adooted by lsrge majority.
pnofosEp 1Awa.
Tho COMMITTEES 90 The Amendment Of the
Laws ra0rted = tiIl providing Tor die nsyment
ri arnensaa bv the rnrtios a,fiufced ro Ia in Tia
wrong in suits before tho Courts. which wa laid
nnou the table.
An nct having references II, tho navmant of
iu1orY' fees waa dealt with in the sane manner
Mr. J, &. Cooper said that as 1oooe membors
we're to come up for consnre, she rerortors
ought to be excluded. He offered 3 resolution
10 that effect.
Mr.. ". Il. King objected. There wss no ns-
nass1t7 to enforca m Y1binr of the gind.
III. Cooper ,nsisted upon ha motion.
ine CnaH1nso ia'l"'to0 "uethos 'u7 Reporters
would agree not to report the pamcs OF pAr.ies
brought up for consuro-uniese found guilty
n case they we're allowed TO remain.