The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-03-12
DECISIONS.
SUPREME CoURr-CHAMBEss.
Ry Judge Lawrence.

BY Judge Lawrence.
Hendricks VS.. Tulloch; Wemple w. Society OF
the Church OF the Puritans; In the matter of
Hoelze; Dickinson VS.. Coogan Russell VS.. McLatn
Whalen vs.. Burke; Haughwout VS.. Doons; Will
mont Va. Meserolc Avery vs.. Goodchid; Bowman
vs.. Matthew'S; in the matter or Beygan; LosZk VS..
Scott; Cranda ys. The Phenlx Insurance Com
pany; Barrett vs.. Cunningham.-Granted.
smith vs. Avery.--Under the circumstances dis
closed BY the arldavIts OF the plaintiff this motion
should be denied. the cases. having been marked
of for the term, will come on or trial IN due time
upon The calendar.
Hamilton VS.. Martin.-In addition TO alleging
that the defendant has promised 70 pay $19 so Tor
the services rendered by the plaintln the coSn.
plant contains an ayerment that the services
were reasonably worth that sum. The defendant
is think. entitled 70 bill OF particulars. Let
such bill be served within ten days, ana defendant
have ten days after service TO answer
Manton PoOe.-rnls case seems to come
within the decision OF tais Court IN Lawton VS..
KEEL (57 Barb. 30), and Ciews vs.. Rockford, Rock
Island and st. Louis Railroad Company Is. G.
Il. Il. 66sl. am constrained, therefore, 10 deny
the motion to vacate the atIaehment win costs.
The London. New York and Hartford Publishing
Company ". Dillon-Must give notice OF motion.
hellenstein Vs. Fergerson.-Must I'LL up blanks.
Molleson VS.. Halle Must give notice. An order
TO show cause cannot be granted under the rule.
Cowing VS.. Cassdy.-n the deIendant Will give
a bond in the sum OF $1,000, with two sureties. 10
be approved by the Court conditional Tor the pay
ment OF any judgment and all costs and damages
that may be recovered by he plaintin, the motion
Will be granted on payment OF costs OF motion to
paintil; otherwise IL is denied, with costs OF
motion 10 plaintiff.
Robinson vs.. Busberne.-I will allow supple.
Robinson, but cannot grant The further relief
asked for.
BY Judge Donohue.
Klein vs.. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPECIAL TENN.
BY Judge Curtis.
Aolsom Bank OF Montreal VS.. Howard ct al
Motion amend answer and LOT commission
denied, with costs TO plaintiff, to abide event OF
suit
posit by appe liant OIL $500 IN United states Trust
Iou nv no n "a .
order to be settled on notice.
STRAIN VS. WIlliams.-aoton 10 amend answer
notice OF trial; date OF issue and assignment for
trial 70 remain.
MARINE COURT CHAMBERS
BY Judge Gross
Enwood Vs. Pracro.-Mouon To vacate denied,
but bah reduced 10 $780,
Reilly VS.. Wilson.-Motion denied.
The Architectural Iroa WORKS VS. WeDer.-Case
settled and lied.
Kelly vs.. Harrlson-See endorsement on pa
BY Judge McAdam.
Spratt vs. NICHOLS Motion denied, with leave to
move TO open deIault
Crovo vs.. CIementl.-Motion granted on stIpu-
latlng not TO sue, sc.
Ri1gler W. MISREPRESENTATION ordered on
Aercillott VS.. Oesterrchor will
issue unless defendant pays $40 costs and submits
10 an examination on the l5tn
Peiser vs. Citron.-Motion granted unless palm
tin pays $40 and MES note OF issue, &c.
Reay VS.. Lee.-Defauit opened on payment OF
So costs &c
Vandike W. Parkins.-Motion granted on stlpu-
latlng not TO sue.
Berdel VS.. Hyde.-MotIon granted on payment
OF So. Judement and case TO stand.
Schmtt vs.. SiatheT.-Order VIII De set aside un-
less terms are complied with.
Heyman VS.. Ney.-Modon granted as per order
Gle1.
Cruikshank VS.. Eastburn.-Default opened on
payment OF costs.
Tyrrill VS.. Travers-Order iled.
Davidson VI. Weiter.-Delauit opened on pay.
ment OF costs.
Cohen VS.. Ra nwitZ.-Motion denied.
Marsh W. Springfield; RusIr VS.. Hoffman: Hern.
man VS.. karley-Iotion 10 advance causes
granted.