Gallipolis journal. [volume] (Gallipolis, Ohio) 1837-1919, 1875-05-20


Barton Lowe VS.. Geo. w. Isaminger.
Judgment for plaintiff for $655.2 and
mortgaged premises ordered sold.
Solomon Long VS.. John Evans. APP
peal. This was suit brought to re-
cover for medical services rendered the
defendants wife, who was afflicted with
sore eyes. Judgment for plaintiff for
$3S.0S.
Francis NJ. Washburn VS.. Jonathan
Hamilton. Judgment for plaintiff for
$552.10.
Azariah Denny VS.. George Denny.
Appeal. This wasa suit about q shot
gun trade between the sons of the par
ties. Judgment for defendant for costs.
Marion J. Dewitt vs.. VIM. and Sarah
Lewis. Plaintiff dismissed his action.
Mary A. Ward ct ais. vs.. Chas. w.
Gee ct ais. Plaintiff dismissed her ac-
ton; costs paid; no record.
T. S. & II. N. Ford vs.. s. G.. Keller.
Settled at costs of defendant.
II. z. Adams VS.. George Howarth.
Motion to amerce sheriff. Plaintiff dis
missed his action; sheriff to pay cost.
Jas. V. Porter VS.. c. w. Rader ct ais.
Partition sale confirmed aud deed order
ed.
Thos. Sims & Co. VS.. Rob't F. Hughes.
Receivers report confirmed.
Allen Viers VS.. Anna Viers e: ais.
This action was brought to set aside a
deed made by John Viers to his SOIL An
drew. The grounds alleged were that
the old man Vi.rs was unduly influ-
enced to make the deed when he was in
capable Of contracting. The court
found that he had not been influenced
unduly, and that at the time he made
the deed he was of sound and disposing
mind. Petition dismissed at plaintiff $
costs.
Rachel Watkins vs.. Ansel Lawless ct
ais. Court found that the claim of the
plaintiff is lien for purchase money on
certain lands conveyed by Lawless to
Coates. The claim is $685..
James NJ. Kerr VS.. Milton r. Walkers
admir-. Judgment for defendant for
costs.
Leanah Blessing vs. Jno. r. Bless
ing's admir- ct ais. Court found that the
support of the plaintiff is charge and
lien upon the land. The value of said
charge fixed by the court at $500. Each
party to pay his own costs.
Joseph Lindle VS.. Sebastian Goetz.
Former order Of reference withdrawn,
and referred to C. NJ. Holcomb as Mas
ter Commissioner.
Jno. L. Midday vs.. Josiah Irwin and
Henry Swindler. Ordered the sheriff
set off homestead to Irwin, and the
balance to pay plaintiff.
Simeon Nash vs.. Abraham Newton.
Petition for injunction against the de-
fendant's slaughter-house. Injunction
granted against defendant slaughtering
animals at the place named in petition.
Notice of appeal given; bond 5000.
Jeremiah Yoho VS.. Lewis Hager. APP
peal. Court found that defendant did
wrongfully detain the goods and chat
tells: plaintiffs damages assessed at one
cent.
Mary f. Patton VS.. A. o. Shepard's
admir-. Ordered that defendant furnish
plaintiff with itemized bill of particu-
lars, etc.
John w. First VS.. Barbara Mink. Err
ror. Court found that the justice had
no Jurisdiction of the case.
Luther M. Beman VS.. Joseph S. Ea-
kins. Judgment by default for 1888 SO;
motion to vacate attachment pending.
Enos, Hill 4 Co. vs.. same. Judgment
for $l93 81.
Killing, Shober & Co. vs. John Dom
nally, Plaintiffs dismissed their ac-
tiOn.
The Brown, Manly Plow Co. VS. Chas.
W. Gee. Settled; costs paid.
ID. Y. SmitherG VS.. q. w. Isaminger
and N. p. Fenner. Appeal to be dis
missed unless additional security be
given by May Goth.
John Davis VS.. d. Lewis g. IN q.
ais. Motion to dissolve Injunction over
ruled.
John Sanns and H. II. Neal, Oh beba,f
Of the city of Gallipolis ct. ais. T1ora
is long entry in this case setting for,,,
the reasons for granting injunction: in.
junction granted.
State of Ohio VS.. James w. Erwin
Murder. State declared itself ready tn
proceed to trial on Saturday; defendant
objected because he had not been served
with copy Of the panel of the jurors
by which he was to be tried three days
before trial; court overrnled the objec-
ton, and defendant excepted. Court
then continued the case for want of
time to try 1t, to which defendant ex-
cepted. Defendant then filed his mo-
ton for discharge, which was overruled.
and defendant excepted. Court ordered |
defendant to enter into recognizance Of
$1,000 which he did; defendant except
ing thereto.
EoLLIEs.
State of Ohio vs.. Henry Geer, Daniel
Geer aud John Marks. Injuring fruit
trees.
State VS.. Moses Moch and Sarah Moch
% cases.) Selling liquor aud keeping a
Fesm,
state Of Ohio VS.. Jennie Ford and Ma
tilda Harbour. Larceny.