Idaho tri-weekly world. (Idaho City, Idaho) 1875-1875, 1875-07-14

to adams himself. The atSd..e..h baud,
molten to dismiss were not 1 "s1 aud
in the proceedings. Neithe.s' 'Codled
Howe, Esq. who appeared as -. :. n
flor Governor Bennett at ~, 80 ."s.'t.orney
dispositions, nor Mr.. Adams 'ak'Ae d
to embody the affidavit and n pl,p'al
IN the proceedings, nor was i !. IN
referred to by any party dur;"s ts y
and the only intimation or 3 The
edge my attorney, Mr.. y " yaonl
I.angford, had Of the existenc. :" ;. =
papers, was derived from Mr I y lie
before the commencement Of n sas@
ings. Showing fully that Ada p'veesd
derstood the matter to have been 1 ~. w.
in his hands for private. MT paesd
uses. How does the case s,,l ps''!s
view Of all the cries of injuys s,; ~. u
cence that characterize the let,e, .'' y
Governor Bennett? An AFFIDAVIT t'' y. .
no''o" 70 DISMISS the taking Of ,bs
dispositions is made at Boise c;,r ''s
February 9Th. 1t is placed in n;;,. %
hands and conveyed with all p o,,;1's
speed to Lewiston, and reacI,cs, i it, das
tination within less than fortye; aJs+
hours, before the time fixed for t, I,s"'
the dispositions. Mr. Adams, WIN , ~.'
and bad been since January !, ls c;'
an applicant to Governor Bennett ~
All office Of honor. trust and n,os.
within his gift. with a salary Of 4 an
per annum and fees. The motion ,,1
affidavit is placed in his (AdansT
hands. and is never adverted odur',,
the proceedings by either HI: Adam,
nor the attorney appearing for Gov
Bennett. J. n. Howe, ESQ.,, who VA
also an applicant for the same pos,o.
Of District Attorney. The motion vu
perfectly frivolous.
Mr.. Langford swears that on Pei.
18th Mr.. Adams informed him that b. |
Adams). had been promised the 4,
poinim"nt Of District Attorney from
said Bennett, at the time the af6dsr,
and motion to dismiss the taking d
dispositions were placed in his hands;
Mr.. Adams further stating to Mr. Iapn
ford in the same connection, and
from the transaction he understood
that if he granted the said motion
that be should receive said appoint
ment, which was worth three thvuNi
dollars per annum, and If he tovftk
dcpositiols he would not receive said
appointment" Mr. Rand's af6tm
shows that on or about FebrusrylA
1875, M. Adams informed bin that
at would be to his interest not totan
the evidence, saying the fact is this:
] have received an affidavit from Co..
Bennett claiming that am an import
ant witness for him. in this contest
and he wishes me to dismiss the ns
ter: Adams then further said to me- i
| (Adams), dismiss the notice sM %
not take the evidence, ! will sr
pointed District Attorney, but u la
take the evidence, ! will not R ~
Al osANt
pointed, and it will be three th0a'sN
dollars out of my pocket
Why did Bennett publish only
short extract from Adams letter .
April 9th, and commit the wrong
putting a different meaning upon ,l.
than was intended by Adams aa al.
saws in the letter to Bennett Of '9a
9th: And it is also true that u ! *. =,
assured Of the appointment OF ps' ~
Attorney in case ! complied v ,,.a,
motion of the Governor WV VI 3
what gave him that assurance u y
ans informed Langford that DC s, NJ
ams) had been promised the sPT r.,
ment of District Attorney Nv" Vb
nett" upon like conditions o'a;,,, tt
made that promise! 0el's.D clsa
assurance and the promise ;. v e' s %.,I
a character as to fully satisfy !, ' .r
as shown by his expressions a. ,hr
time, and his efforts to esc'E' ;"
sponsibility- ~, Gcent
The extract published o y, v 4 lp]
Bennett, from Adams 'e. ~ ,he rts
9th, is fully explained ~ aa % ~
text of the letter. ard a,nc'rh Nv Co.,
base play of words, se'eo'ea =. \ 4, Il,
Bennett to dis;ort and chans h.nsit
meaning. For the especial r' "
Gov. Bennett and his eo.s .o;ng N
iniquity, publish the I '.'Ys bnrt
my own signature, ana 'e s"l,ps 81
- ..a ,r.raral blackg'''' s