The New York herald., 1875-03-17
SUPREME CoURT-GHAMBERs
~, BY Judge Lawrence.

0randuN. .
SUPREME coygT-GAAMBERs
~" BY Judge Lawrence;
Trustees OF tire Protestant School vs.. Young
this case am waiting for the papers and poln ts
which were to be handed IN BY counsel:
Belord vs. waters.-lDjunction continued un-ll
Rockland County Nitro-G -Gycerine Company vs.
Sweet-Apphcatlon is denied.
Smith vs. Smitn.-In this case there must be
some further proof OF the identity OF the defend
ant and OF the commission of the offence with
which she is charged,
swift vs.. Prouty.-Motion to set OF judgment is
granted.
Kenworthy VS.. Phyie-T DO not think that it
would be In lurtherance OF justice TO grant the
amendment. Motion denied win costs. code,
Thompson vs.. Connecticut Mutual Life Insur.
ance Company.-Ihe amount OF the bond will be
reduced TO $500.
Whiting Vs. Whit1ng.-Report or referee is con-
1rmed, with costs OF motion.
BY Judge DOnOhue.
In the matter OF Hussey.--I think the defendant
is entitled to discharge. Chapter p laws 1850
page s, simply means to extend the right 10 olS
charge TO a case when the debt is due the state,
excepting when IL Is incurred in the manner
stated. Prisoner should be discharged, order TO
be settled on notice.
Jones vs.. WOrk.-I do not think afidavit of SER
AtpleDee VS.. Towle Pike vs.. Davies; Wilson vs..
W.. Taylor Cleveland Boiler Plate Company vs..
Gulick; Green vs.. Republic FIRE Insurance Com
FIRE FIRE
pany; London, New York and Hartford Publish.
ing Company vs.. Strakosch; Cutting VS.. stevens;
Niles vs.. Bilhelmer Toledo National Bank VS..
Darlington; Rutrer VS.. Scnleier; Blum VS.. Lynch;
Everett National Bank vs. Lombard Campbell vs..
Townsend; Orcutt ". Lewis; Manning vs. DAVIS;
Cook VS.. Harrison; stewart va. Winchester;
Goeet vs. Blossom; Crane vs.. Pool Led0erwoOd
tlonal Bank vs. Valentine; Pnlladephia Coal Com
pany VS.. Bass; Everett National Bank vs.. Jenny,
Jr.; -; Reed vs.: Genet Metcal vs.: Mount; Parsons
williamson; Falkenoerg vs.. Imersen; Macgregor
vs.. Williams Llnaorn rs & vs.. Gamblers Rood VS..
Frank VS.. Bryan Mott VS.. Humerton; Mast vs..
Tracy; Beakley vs.. Maltby; Mott VS.. Humerton.-
Macmurdo VS.. Markham Martin VS.. Hicks; Gaw-
try vs.. Baker; Cneesman vs.. Johnston; Billings
Bulkley.-Motions denied
Meolleson vs. Webster.-Denicd.
See vs. Beards.ey; Rhineander VS.. Haas.-Mo-
DAVIS, Jr., VS.. Hnyer.-Must give notice
Jones VS.. Jones.-Report OF referee confirmed
and decree oi divorce granted to plaintn.
Pool vs.. Bssell.-Motlon Tor stay granted. Men,
orandum.
Rldabock vs. Lane.-M denied. Memoran-
Green VS.. The Niagara Insurance Company and
three others, 10 consolidate acuons.-DeDied.
Woodworth VS.. Woodworth.-l do not thInK the
party served Is sufficiently Identified.
Purchase vs.. Ferdon; Brown vs.. Geery.-Mo-
tions denied MemOrandums.
In The matter OF Observation-Disclosures ordered.
HotcnKiss vs.. Root-Denied, without COSTS
Moileson vs.. Hae.-Granted Memorandum.
String VS.. Diimars-Granted. Memorandum.
Sherwood VS.. Edwards.-Must give notice 10
tnlru party
craven vs. Proud.-Granted. Memorandum.
In the matter oil Clarkson.-0rder not correct.
Coulter vs.. Whlte.-Motion denied.
SUPERIOR coURT-sPEcIAL TERM.
BY Judge Curtis
Johnston vs. Johns on.--J judgment for paintit-
for a lIn ted divorce. So opinion.
Rauch vs.. acknowledgement ior defendant In
action Tor llmted divorce. See memorandum.
schema VS.. Freund ct al--Mouon TO strike out
part OF complaint Denied with costs OF opposing
tU pantlff TO abide event OF suit.
II. ~ r.
Schaier vs.. The National Butcners and Drovers'
Bank.-Motion granted.
tlues et al VS.. slmonfeld ct a.-Motion granted
on payment OF planti1s' cost opposing.
by Judge Sedgwlck.
Bell VS.. SPOTS, admlnlstratriX, &c--JudQment
for plaintin. Findings settled. see opinion.
Murphy ct al. vs. Representatives. settled.
Howiand vs.. smith, ct al-See memorandum
for counsel