, 1875-02-12

ttBi,t:nJ that when WikeHon SAID that llo pru-
tectcd Elton lo'hll'E hin coa!oIal adversary in
Wl,oIe volume Of response, btt Ea'I nothing.
nnwES AND E1SeELLA.
Then Tilton waH PUMPED HH tn 1iis connection
with the publication Of the Bowen letter. irBt in
Ea5ie. / have already explained l,os that pub.
Iirattnn wnn nude by atsachcs @: tho Eagle 10
ti,crt popular attention from q dis
graceful scene In tic outskirts Of the
Mia. Field, ard proclaimed 10 tl,a thirty gazing
IooHetg-on that tho father OF her nine daughters
was tn sdntcrer. kinae'la tiud to ALBANY, anf
drl not return until Uowcn. BY tI,e publication II
that letter, was compelled 70 drop aggressive
warfare on Ki.sella and llis t!cbaucf.eEies IN tho
putic schools. and take to dffen:'1ng himself.
now TIE wuoDurLI. KkrT W ArrEAHAscEa,
II was now tno for Wooihull to bu Brought
up omen mare. and Ttltnts. ut Eya.ta 1cq,eet, DE-
Gcsibel llrr houno and furniture. Tia audience
sas much odilied to loarn taut. though 1t was =
tvo wero absolutely t,nfurnislled. The
point Of tho crosa examination just
here lad delicate reference to THO number OF
date when hfoutton surrendered The parers III
keeping tu Titson brought tho morning session
To ill tEd.
stn. EvAnTg IN NO ntnE7.
Tho afternoon va3 zealortlr Ill. tcdioug1y de-
sot.d Ly l:vatts 10 the reMlilig Of bunurv pRh-
ssges from Tilton's story. with CONNECTED iu-
auirIes ~ to whether lo still adhered to them,
whom initin1a reprcsented md tnahs Of .uch
apparently Bupetfluors aud unnecessary detail.
Judge Ne'iton besoughs Eynr's 70 Goiclude tue
but EvartB stubborn1y refused. thnnti! promise
was rot from him tuat hc would drag 1t no fur
lher that tomorrow.
srEcu1A71oHs Asn Go:str.
BY noon Tomorrow there III every prospect OF
Tilton ESCAPING from the clutch Of tho defense.
AMI lateng ouce moro into tue kindly guidance
ct direct examination. Tito reIiieck will prob-
nbly not DO concluded till Monday evening.
Tunsday morning ho viii have to submit to re-
crnsR-examinntson, aud 1t will probably be
Wednesday AFTERNOON before tho 1lext witneRs
will tale tlIc stand. ThAt Witness will p.ohabiT
10 frank Curnenter. I have bcen Informed by
very cre1itahle authority TINT, directly after tue
adjournment Of Congress, Gen. Butler wilt ar
rive horo anu take part in the prosecution. Til
toms bar il b. many regarded as moEe than q
/ n,a:ct! for Ueeclor'a. ad vuks Together il por-
feet barnouy. With Dutler tu Offset Tracy. the
r:aiI;iilf's caHo will certainly not DO decient IN
eiicuue. DoeTon SYNTA1.
t3o the 4 s;oc3Hted I1css.l
THE GnlPAETIrE AuHEEEESr.
NV YoEK, Feb. 1l.-NotwilllBtanding the
Buow aud rain and tho ley side"a allss tlis norl-
City Courtroom Lad as crowded an nttrnoatlce
to-day as Oh any previous day. Mrs. Tiltou aud
Mrs. FiaId were rrshont early, bu: Mr. Heecler
| and his wife did not Rrriso until q short tina
aftcr tho proceedings begun. a few prelln,in-
aries having bccn settled by counEel, Mr..
|. Jyasts continued the cross-cxaninattou of lIr.
1i!t,n.
| Witness said: have no copy Of tho draft OF
| Tia trirnstlte ngrcenen tio Hns hludod n
,;ampl,lotl l do not know wbeiher this IL a
capy Of tho or,s,nar draft of tho agreement,
lh.lgh it purports to be. coll1 not y wear that
thi4 is tho exact pl,raseulogy OF tue Original
| draft. I tbiuk That the tr!partito covenant,
| ns put into my hands for signature, was In tho
| t,r,,, iii Gn+ 1ero
impression that thD dtaIt was written by him TOO
I think tho original draft waH read to me Ia
M1uiton's study In the presouco Of Mr. Clahn
hlr. Wllkoson. Dir. Mou!ton, md myself. coul1
nor eau say whether 1t was in the morriuG Of
evening TINT it took place. cannot say II thu
! Taper shown me tlieIl MAS prepared for my sl6
naluro. My recollection il Tint ClRilin asEsd MI
] n day or 30 after, tlat, ii i3owen withdrew hii
i charge In writing against Beeclet, would no
s,.rcaI tucm nnY moro. said II Bowen woult
i sign the agrcemout, ......
WOULD cIaN IT TWENTY TIMES OVER,
| l oXprceped my belief then tLat Bowen wou!f
| not sign the covenant. rickeu up pen ant
paper. anl then stated that If Bowen would At
inch his mama to it, I would sfgn it as often 81
thoy desired. Tho witness went on TO explain
| that in iEoIo extended examination OF tlt
| agreement hn saw the paragraph te wRs aaket
To sign. ana, Rs it waa not iu The terms he dc
sired, no refused to attach hiH name to it unlest
it ans modified in Hnn1o degree. I do not re-
member reading NIL tho document, but I read ,
this exclamation. THO witness continued
What prevented my signing 1t then va
because Dir, Bowcn's namo WAS no
attached to the clause prepared for him
explcseed my, Willingness to Sign It, but ait
not signify my iutsntiou. I do not soaemba
auy peysoil saying. Don't sign It tlrst, as Mr.
Boxen may nat sigu It," h1t. Moulton nlny hav
said this. ln: do not remember 1t lie did. w.
impression ia tint hIonltou eaia he thought Bow
IN would not sign, mud Cla0ln, clenehlng Ill
| hand. Ea,d, " Bowen has got to sign IT," d.
nol know who tool; away the paper fro:l Moul
| toH. I raw the paper IYain when was expect
Cd to sign, but do not remember tho day OF tn
hour ;~but think cav 1t in Wilkeeons Office
| III what was then the North Pacific Raillo1d of
tico. and 1t then lay bntWoen us, but do not re
member II called for it. 1cannot say wuotlo
I then porused or considered the document.
| do not know whether it was tlore or Wllkesont
o'ics On TINT OCCASION. l do not remember th
| d4to whcn tho draft cAtno into my possession
mud was made the subject of my claugo,
THE AWARD GIVEN Me
waa DoW1n'Y cilecd for 47.U01. Moplton Was
the.e then. Lut do not think I haudoi over tft
check to him, but porllaps I gave tbs check Q
day or two after, fur deposit, to Frank Wood
ruiz. Lavo no draft OF tllis proposed chang
in my possession. but Wilkesop las. 1t vas lefl
In bis possession. do not think composed 9
paragraph. but took portion from that OF VII
1ncnbor that signed it at this interview, but
runomber tue parties were not togetbor whet
they signed. !. ttiuk, however. that Bowen eign
ed it t,st; did second, and Mr; bsechcr last
signing over my nane. 1hie paper wa'
not executed In duplicate, but oply On,
copy nas signed. Nllkoson. Ind soyesa
oopless PREPARED o for 70 no!'cai9n' acs c,.ct IT,
I 10 nut know II any person wAs presen
whon sisaod i: .1l,s' cannot t say u Wkesou
Possibly atoulton may have boon present, but
do not remrn.bcr tho p'aoo or limo at ~hich th
papcr was signed. canuot now remember ~hs
got tho paper Aitor it was BEntd, think 20
check from Bowen on tue hight Of tue signing
Of tho arbitration I did not agn the arbitration
without getting tito check, bit obtained 1t hAl
an Luur n.4er my na,uo waa written 10 it, t!,ougl
Wilkcgon sail to tho CONTRARY boforo tho Inves
tigating Commlttuc.
blr. Eyarts asked counsel on the other side fo
The production! Of tho "truo story" but th'
lroaeeul,oh had not brought IT into court, ant
proluisoJ to do 10 after lile racesa.
Tho Witness continued: put In typo t!t
| bowen letter. with comments about tA1
| cbd of March, 1879, I discussed It Wit