, 1875-04-27


| Mr. Eyutss--fon are gentleman Of litntai
| cinc"t!'ni a. lam s.uduntc.
| g, Of Am,'",sl :, it- Sir.
@ And h." '*cn rt'ncucd to the profession Of the
la"| \. ys,. SIR
@ Nov, us I" Mr. Albert Woodruff WHO ,sas he, 4.
1Io was tue ahinr 5ar1 IT thu irn Of A. Wuuiru y
Robinson: think h. Ven. mi OF tho hrln not fur frau
] the year 1850, hui vii! nnt bry Iu4iYry NLea.
@ He VII" un "s''r urhes Ut p firm tIan tl, Mc.sn.
Rnh!na"n Win still rrIuatnt A. ic+, sir.
Q. II no thu fatlsr ni Mr. franklin HomlrnTl H. Np
Fir; be ia q distant ru4uectlon--ac cousin.
O. YOU have satl tnt yuu thInk Mr. Franhin WosH
rf wAs not present. at tho conversation ,utscen Mr.
aulton an" yourself, ~hieh you ays sIyen A. think
| 1ls Naa not.
Q. Do you re,ncHrr ocrasou in wlrn yuu bad
conversation with Mr.. F,unLliM Woornfi 4. Shortly
hefoFo hRd thIs sonye1sA,loa With Sir. ann1tnb, Mr.
WolslrlH tuli
Mr. lisaeh-Seyer miRd
Tho Witness--11n toll nc--
Mr. llcach-Wl son stop. Sir. Y.u know; yon nrs =
lawyer.
Tho wItnr.s-I onsht not to have That brought up
against NIa, lT.auHhfcr,l
hfr. Evarta-yun hull II chnyeeAatfon. Nnw, In shae
conversation With Sir. Franklln Woodruff, which yols
now RECALL, VAS i'c sultct OF Mr. Tilton writing this
Life or Tho snlIcc Of tho comparative nmbse VI HpIr-
ualaia and co'srcgsona=ts tn tne country apukon oit
A. Ito sahl---
Q. No Hnttrr w.mt no said. Please t" an4wsr yes or
10; was uo nj these thu sulret Ut ch1ysrsations 4.
Ono OF tllrln ~as.
T. Nllic! was 1hlt1 \. Tile comparative Number Of
Hprtnallsts atl toNsrcgatlonalls.s
@. Whut did Mr.. Woodruff aay OF that suiJcctf
MIR. 1seach-t 'lc.re to olyrrt.
Nr. Eyarts-1f this IL u.eetud TO, suppose not
entitled to show timt.
Mr.. shcaran-1t was partly ene4 out their ea an,-
inalsUn
atr. Ilcacl-N1, Sir; you nre not correct.
Mr. Eyarts--I 4tul't kuw thnt thsy have pruyrl auy
part Of tllAt conversations
Judge Ncilsou-No, thoy have not
Mr. Eyurs-The wltnoss got 30 fur ~ to SOY thai 10
told lin something
Mr. 9hearmaulf tho stenogrsphar will rcaa tho e44n-
luatlon your Honor will l that hr. Partridge xavc
part nf that conversation.
Judso Ncilson-1f be did so 1t without the eon.ent
OF counsel, who lBrslstcntly objected.
Mr. sAcar1uau-1t your Honor please tt was juat the
~hcn Mr. Tllton anil Mr Aoultoa wcro On tho
aau; thoy naa certain Statements to wuh Mr. Evarts
oh1octe but as e did not to hayo them stFloken
from the record tho statements held to be evidence
in tho case.
Judge Neson-1 do not any necessity for cxp1an-
Ing any former ruling but clear that tho counsel
very persstent in trying to stop ths witness.
MI. 6heRrmRu-1t precisely the salna experience
With Mr Eyarts when examining Mr. Tt0n; no waa try
Ing to stop hn md ret certan statements made.
Which allowed to remain because there no mo-
klon TO ats!ko them out at the time
Judge Eellsou-I do not think tia. those rcmarha sre
called for
Mf. Beachlf your Honor please Il IL IN entire NILS.
Btatcment. nconsciousy made, have uubt, by the
counsel; but 1t IL d Misrepresentation.
Judge kcsonTha observations uucalled for refor
ring any former ruling, whoh hRs no application hess
str Beach unusually eager In stopping this wttpsss
who. d0ubtlesa without sny Intention, wa1 continually
wandering from the question.