New-York tribune., 1875-01-23
THE CROSS. EXAMINATION RESUMED.

Mr Tracy-Do you remember what was known
Is the woodruff scandal think has been referred to once or
twice during the examinations A Yes Sir it has been refer
red 10.
@ That was published the 2sih OF October 1872 believe
A. don't recouect distinctly the date 1t was sometime
In October or Noyember-thee early part Of November 1872
q the date Of the rparte agreement down to the
publication Of scandal what had been Mr. Ttons oceups
ton as whoe' What had he been employed during the
Summer A. think on the paper, II recolect right
@ On The Golden AgeP Yes, think 30.
Had he not been engaged in the political campaign
that YEAR, The running wild my head Yes
he had been the political campaign, believe, for Mr.
Greeley
@ lie went after the rparte agreement TO Cncinna
A. don't remember when he went 70 Cincinnati at the time
OF the convention, whatever date that was
@ Nothing occurred Of Importance between these parties
that you recolect during the Summer Of 1874 No. Sir
think not; nothing that know or
@ There vas a term OF quiet and peace A Is that a
question:
O. Yes, Sir was there not' A. Mr. TEon away and
Mr Beecher was here.
@ You recall nothing about it' A No Sir don't recall
anything
@ Afer the woodruff publication, understand you say
that You had frequent interviews with Mr. Bowen A Yes
@ On the subject OF whs; should be- made to him
A. Yes Sir
@ understand you also say that you advised silence
A. Yes, Sir.
Mr. Ryars-That paper II your Honor please was brought
Into evidence by your learned friends in the way testimony
concerning it; and understand IT, they are TO produce
and put II in evidence
Mr. Fueron-I do not know how the gentleman came to
understand that
Mr. Rvars-By the testimony you want to look at Il thai
you being allowed 10 talk concerning were 80 allowed
upon the ground that you going produce II in proof
Mr. Fulerton-I don't recall anything Of kind in the ey
6eDce-anything from which promise could be implied
Judge Nelson-No promise had general evidence on the
sgbject
Mr. Evarts-weT, wen see. lResdng from testimony Of
Jsnill
by Ars Woodruff Illicit intercourse between Mr. Beecher and
Ers TiltOn was chsrgedi ,,,,,
Mr.. FunertoD-well II you want the article
Mr. Ryarts-We don't want the article.
Mr. Fueon-You have the whole OF In, or have that
part in propose TO leave out you VIII admit an answer
g. that question, and pay further attention 10 1t.
Mr. EvMtsl cannot 70 any substitute for evidence
Mr. Fuerton propose 10 give that In evidence Sir whether
that charged IN that paper not necessary that we
shoud produce II here.
Judge NesOn-Does the learned stand upon the OBJ
se,Non that that the paper 81, would best show it,
Judge Nelson-Then you cannot do H. You m1a produce
$h paper you produce the paper and Identify IT, you can
Mr. PulertOn-well Sir will go then with the eyi
cenee, AID introduce the paper tomorrow"
judge Nelson-which he didn't do.
Mr.. Evsrts4t overlooked Of course
Mr.. Fulerion-Now. he calls upon me 20 produce IT.
Mr. Ryars-Now, is In evidence it is regarded. by
rsngemen between counsel in evidence or else
Che further examination would allowed 70
Judge NeisOn-In other words, they wished to show
Certain clause in and 1t ruled they could do that
without producing the paper and counsel might have thought
b. would have to refer the subject, did doit
Mt E'ars-We called upon them. aud we saY 10 theu to
Lgt Il ia e,denca