New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-03-19
FINAL DISPOSITION OF THE WEST CHARGES.

| just what it does
Mr. manThat Just what Mr. Fullerton Instructed
the witness he did not and left tie question utterly M
ineligible.
judge Neon-The words What became Of this, then''
are understood Whl done with them, aud where
and where they put aud keptr'
The wness-G positively bat am rather In
cncd to think that they in bundle OF documents at my
house though won't be certain transferred them TO ths
gentleman who was elected clerk when ceased to at.
There was no clerk and made Clerk pro tenn, and when
another gentleman elected, either handed the papers to
him, Think else they are in my possession at home
@ Well now look at the paper which now show You and
say what it is A. This it, in part least Sir copy OF Mr.
Vests charges think; am they are not the ofgnai'
| they may be copy and suppose they Gre
q Look at letter accompanying them and say "hat tha'
isl A. It to be a notice Of the cerkof the gentleman
who was then CT k Of the Committee to Mr. Til;on
q Serving copy Of the charges upon him; isn't IN Yes
| sir.
@ And do yon that those no, the ohages' did
mott said it the original paper s1I it copy
Of them suqpoee it Is an exact copy.
@ OF the original charges! A. Yes; the charges on tho
original papcr
Mr. sheaunan-Th are not the original that is an ex
PLANTATION.
The wncss-Trat "a not think the ohsnal-T think i'
the clerk Mr. --dse's writing don't think tits hr Vests
that answers
@ Now, Is that in the handwriting Of the clerk Of Ply
mouth Church: A. l think it is, Sir, as sld
Mr. shcarman-No the clerk: A. Not the clerk Of the
church the cek Of the Examining Committee; Big your
pardon, Sir.
O. All r,ht the Examining Committee; and you gay It
copy Of the chaes originally presented, do your A. No.
Sir; don't, Sir said it copy Of the original paper
supposed
@ Wei, Of the original papor A The paper a. Mr. West
presented it.
O. Very well; now the point where yon can
point the nrcrccons in IT, thenG No, Sir; cannot,
because paper West presented it, is not here; tho
printed matter j. not here
@ But you tell that that copy Of the original paper
which Mr. West present Il: A. will read H. sir; but
Il nix that the printed would take than the psco
Of whole piece put in, and so It canno be here.
O. Now Mr. Halliday, it either copy copy Of the
original paper pr seated by NJ West Say which it ' A.
Icanno tell from reading it, Sir whether is or not; can
only tell by looking tAc original paper whether It is copy
oft.
Mr. shearman-If yon will allow me to say one word You
spending r,at dc II time aud the witness answering
drec the question and judge Fulcrton-f he will permit
medi precisely the distinction This Is not copy 81
the final paper cutei by Mr. Ne bus sof caure aooY
original pcr-that j. Of the original hi, but these
ere not r.ua charges Of Mr. West ~ q tho
yaa charges Of M Vest and therefore my friend JUDO
Fullerton AL the witness answering ~ cross purpose;
| that IA all the difficulty
Mr Falorton-Iher, is difficulty al NJ 70 at ALL Your
Honor Will rco.lcct that Mr. We, presented charges whCI
were though: be insufficient and they referred back for
omendaton He afterwards did hand ID the Commit
tee and the Committee received them, charge, amended to
which Wa ada the Third -p,c alton Th)tc charges were
served upon Elton for the pip)e Of subectng him to
jurisdiction 81 that tribunal ani they presented here
! put in g, idrtcc. .uI arc exhibit ia tie case.
Judge Nei.on-lcs. Sir.
Mr. Fullerton Now they the cha@c finally agreed upon,
OF Is finally made by Mr. West M accepted By that Com
micc and served upon Mr. Tlron Now, d, ~. Gaze any
thing 2bo-, any charge LA; were r;crI to Tho Committee
! LcfoIc that
Mr. ,heqrman-Thcn make the wi,lcs. understand t.at
| certainly did not understand q.
Mr Fuucron-I have hJorcd to make n under taud IT,
and it IS not my fault i he doe, not no he v4ne ~ as
Won the question now whether that j. cop OF tie chars
as fnaly made by Mr. Wet with tie did specification added?
4 have OILY 20 ansyc again, Judge iuie'on. LAT cannot
remember and cHno. state un-s an limited - compare
It with the dccum,uta il on the r.,ol, O, n c M n "a
! per which hold, think
4 Wa not tac ,l. o. your Committee E-,rac.d 10
| cory on Mr. Iil.ong \. GIns h. vas.
O. Don't YOU hnoS j.? A. am certain b, Wa and he Is
the only Gentleman lay judgment who ,aa sa,.r ti.t Is
! exact copy
O. yor, well; AK you this question now vitou; reform;
to any other paper that went before ta. C.nte VIA !ou
point ont ,hc.c waa yoa rgal as iap-c. ns ia lose
charges and ,-cc.i-at ~ aud give 20 tie JIy way
he should 10. be tri.d UPON that paperas b.;
MI Selrmlu--Al0W 10 sale, TIA. T. a-sIn g that tho
witness bias sad h, tAc, defects toc -ecac.onsa
fact that hc las never sail H. sal 10 b. "c't 4; th-re
were defects ia BIS proceedings.
M T.. j. OH
Mr. uIeror- That is no Ingenious even
Mr. Bclc.-N,w, wc have had .aie ,4oa ia ri,.3a !ron
Nr Sherman.
Mr. s,,,l4. J don't propose 20 allow io b.,t ,or
the witness :nia- hat he has made .a- thl.
made lisa very Ingenious Aooc Of CT .,4aaiJa at
| il is not law.
Mr. BcachIt Aaf ingenious, ST., ts to itnct
| tue wines on tac stand
Mr. Shelrma.- except the tribute Of my lcl-gcl fcnd
Mr. Bca.a-Ne. So, y0a deserve 10. llAt F.:I
The Wines ought 10 state 10 the Cour1 4; Rave mott
an, NOT cc Lac have conyey c ia the have
given tie impressions lyus. the re, that
state In proceedings Of tbs kind, thefs only bc
specilcatious but witnesses t. each - 50 on must be
given at The time and in connection In the pIlc
that H. Whatever = clouce; AID then d ls be ccrled IL
there be printed matter that it has been properly ,nLaoi,
that the witnesses have been sen, and a. they vii
appear to testify in regard 10 the points referred to
there. meant TO say that l did object to
M Vests proceedings because he had done thing u
that kind lie had the Witnesses he had proof from
prnted newspaper and he had verdi the testimony
apv WAY lie ncyer had gone the nlhilaa against
which is one Of Of the church, he had gone per-
sooaly to OF the gentlemen against whom he pre-
fered charge; ADD these grounds that dcmurd
Mr. Fullerton Didn't you moment ago, say thal your OBJ
iecons were fouded upon the fact that the charges i'm
perfect? A. We, Sir, meant the whole paper.
O. Oh you ant the whole paperI A. ies, Sir, did;
tainy.
judge Neson-A charge would be imperfect il not have
appended to the Of the witness.
Mr. Fueron-Look, please, to the third specification
and see il the name The witness there. VIII you Do
kind enough to turn? A. VIII Judge Fullerton 1t me say that
the paper as before the Committee had charges against
two persons In It, and that original paper
O. Now, Mr. Halliday
Judge Neison-I think that is proper explanation
Mr. Fulerton-why Sir what explanation it in regard
this uapery This reference the original paper before
the Committee has nothing do with this Ii thrown
hand haa 10 and II he