The Morning herald., 1875-10-09
IiLINIRURSING THE LOSERS.
The Alabama Claims,

lne Alabama Claims.
WASHINGTON, Oct. SIN the Court O
Commissioners of the Alabama Claims thu
following business was transacted to-day
On case 794, for Joss of merchandise on the
Electric Spark; judgement to Everett La..t
for s2,So4.72. Case 29s, VIM. G. Tompkins
of New Orleans, for loss of goods on the
Electric Spark; judgment for s11, ,31S17
Case 1895, Edw'd Roger, ct. al, of New
Orleans, for loss of merchandise on Electric
Spark; judgment for S2,1 ,11s.77. Case 119G
David and James Wallace, of New Orleans
SIS, ,70S.@9. Case 504, Leon Goncchaw, OF
New Orleans; judgment for s1o,o9l .s5;
Case 81, Charles Emanuel, New
York; judgment for s1,s93.1s.
Case Cos, Samuel Gould of Boston, Mass,
judgment for s73s.G4. Case $50, Jos. Pike
of California, Judgment for loss of merchan-
disc on the Gamma Schmidt, $533.7s. Case
Go3, Charles Corruth of Boston, judgment
for $5S1.23. Case COL, w. R. Lewis g. Bro,
Boston, Judgment $2S?.13. Case 71G, Z. F.
Wood & Co., Boston, for loss of merchan-
disc on Crown Point, judgment for S43O6.53
Case 500, II. B. Twambly of Kcnnebunk-
port, Me-, judgment $1,000. Case 952, Enoch
I. Kent of Boston, judgment s2S226. Case
35l, John S. Martin, New York, for loss on
Electric Spark, judgment for $25O7.o1. Case
$40, S. Shook & II. Morgan of N. York city
or loss of merchs lie on Electe.c spark
judgment for 81 ,46O.722 Case As, ,Chas. Platt
Williams, N. Y, loss on Grown Point, judg-
ment $1,371.17. Case $50, Wm. Grant,
Rockland, NJ, judgment for loss ON the
Louisa Hatch. Case 1885, Albert Clark. ct
al, of Boston, for loss of goods on Sea Lark,
Judgment for ss5S.S5. Case 1I3O, P. B.
Keen of Maine, judgment for sS44.Ss with
interest in all the above. Case $50, VIM. E.
Coffin & Co. VS.. the United States for loss
Of merchandise on the Anna T. Schmidt.
Nathaniel Wilson for claimants and GA,
Schneider e. Brebberbicr, ct al, for similar
loss, being the final cases of the
Anna Schmidt, were submitted on
the testimony and oral argument of coun-
sci Cummings and Baker in the latter case,
hearing for claimants, Jno. J. A. Cres-
well for the Uuitcd States. The regular
second call of the Calendar was resumed,
264, When Davis VS.. United States, for loss
of fishing schooner Ada. 2G6, A. G.. Coffin
vs.. United States, loss of merchandise on
Crown Point, &C.; VIM. J. Low for plain
tiff. 145, Fay Bros, of New York, loss of
merchandise on Grown Point. 1893, Henry
j. Selden VS.. United States, for loss of
whisky on Commonwealth. No. 227 August
Hanze of San Francisco VS.. United States,
for loss Of personal effects. No. 1888, j. T.
Hickinboth VS.. United States, loss of mcr-
chandise on Commonwealth. No. 65s
James Frank, of San Francisco.
VS.. United States: for loss of merchandise
on Crown Point. No. 1875, Oscar Foss VS..
United States, coming on for final hearing
were submitted upon the testimony and oral
argument of counsel, W. G. Lorr for plain
Tiff and Frank w. Hackett for United
States. No. 753, II. X. Cummins VS.. I'm
tied States, was submitted upon the testi-
mony and oral argument Of counsel, NJ. G.
g. j. Mitcheson for plaintiffs. No. 1856,
John B. Dickinson ct al vs.. United States,
and case 400, Charles Dimon VS.. United
States, for loss of the Tycoon and outfits,
G. G. Child for plaintiff and F. W. Hackett
for the United States, were submitted on the
testimony and oral argument of
counsel. The following cases for
oss of merchandise in the
Crown Point and Commonwealth, Chas. G. |
Beaman, Jr., appearing for claimants, and
:. W. Hackett for the United States were
,ranted and submitted upon the testimony
md oral arguments of counsel ; 1888, R.
)penheim VS.. United States 385, s. Rich
y A, Rich VS.. United States !; SS4, same VS..
'ame 3S7, same vs.. same {; 4S1, H. A.
Nash VS.. United States 500, Leopold and
Aug. King VS.. United States, and 1,245,
Jno. P. Berney VS.. United States. Next
:ase In calendar, 265.
Court adjourned until Monday. i