Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1875-09-24
c INTELLIGENCE.
THE RUBY CONSOLIDATED MIN.
ISG COMPANY vs.. HERMAN
uEYXEMANy.

Trouble has been brewing between
the above parties for a long time, and
1t now appears that the matters at is
sue have been taken to the courts for
settlement. The following summary
OF the complaint In the United States
Circuit Court, Is from the San Fran
cisco Stock Report Of last Monday:
On Saturday last the Ruby Consoli-
dated Mining Company, composed for
me mos part OF English gentlemen,
nled a complaint in the Nineteenth
District Court against Herman iIeyne-
mann ct al. In May, ls72, the defend
Ant, heynemann, claimed to be the
owner ! b mining rights and pos
seSsory title OF the nine known az
valentine Day, situated In the state OF
NEVADA. An agreement was made be-
tween Heynemann and one Ill. T..
Aimmern, for and on behalf OF tho
company, which mad been incorpor-
aus 70 work the mine, by which the
FORMER agreed to sell the mine for
%.oo,oVv sterling, free and clear from
MI charges, aud to give the company
reg ana undlsturbed possession OF the
property. The company was incor-
porated under the name OF the Ruby
Consoiidated Mining Company, with a
capital VI xS25 900 sterling, divided
into $1,000 shares Of 10 each, and the
agreeinent referred TO was adopted by
Sne company. On the 9th Of August,
.o'o, an aSreement was made between
tne plaintiff and Heynemsnn. by which
sne latter agreed to take y, 500 fully
ft"am up shares In the corporation i'm
,;sv VI cash, and to discharge the plain
~ moM the payment of the f2S5, 900.
p~utsuance OF this agreement the
Sios We're allotted to Heynemann
"nu certain nominees named TO the
.DDnnpany. The greater part of these
SSn".eS had long since been Disposed of
~ n'np' u are now owned by other
pu.s"'is. Liinmern has no Interest
~na.ever IN the affairs of the com
"Aoept as It's representative. and Uey.
nu"nann agreed to hold the titles 10 the
r.oIerty IN trust for the and
49,, 81 anu manage the mines as the
III. anu trustee Of the company. In
ti.n. o"psc'ty he continued for y long
~. resolved large sums If money
.to.n. .ne plaintiff to he used In and
800" 'u s"o BUSINESS, besides large bod
Wy ""u ouilion of great value,
and far In excess of the expenses. liz
also employed a large nmmhar ~ man
under him ~ miners, laborers. super.
intcndents, etc., 1t the cost Of the com.
pany, and among such EMPLOYEES was
John 4. Platter, one Of the defendants
to the suit. All the while the princi-
pal place of business of the comp any
has been In the city of London, Eng,
land, and there has been.no other trus.
tee, agent or business manager Of the
company's business in Nevada or Cali.
iornia except Heynemann, in whom
the fullest confidence was placed. He
represented that IL was important to
The interests of the company that pat
ents should be obtained from the Unit.
81 States Government for the lands
and mines In question. and that until
we patents should be issued every,
thing would have Ia be done in hi,
name, a. being the ostensible owner O
tne property. This arrangement was
accordingly carried out, and the pat.
onts We're IN due time obtained in his
Own name, and are still in his posses.
Ion: Many other circumstances ara
ue.a'le1 IN the complaint for the pur,
pose OF showing that Heynemann ~as