, 1875-04-22
TIE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: Tl1uRsDAY,' April. %, 1875

check shown 10 lin tho check In question. lie also
identified tho slp Of rn,er tncnsioned.
Fynrts offered r,x,t thln slip, nnl leach otJccseh.
rynrs saa that sc wished 10 explain tho transaction
siil was a,l;utttcd. t1,at .ls noss was
IN T1troN's HANDWRITING.
Jalsc Neson sail he ill, not heo how this Was ND
After further ,li.crtlon, the r,prr wa handed to
JNlge Ncllspn who said II might l'o rfn,l IN evidence.
rs. at r;1a 'r 'S se e. IT c o" IT, s e
attention "f t1e Jury to tl,e fass TINT tho n.lloes III
M s ns diss a sas S Il
rco,D collateral matters which Ind accn go,lc OVER
The wIinsas then continued: 4" no. se,ne.nnes
whether lhttu papers cnnncctcti whom thcy ean,c
10 |" III ,,,sss ts viii Ma"iton )" sot IT, Ms
atnuftun aaltf tu hr FnnrtlIhT ahotlt
. No. r1troxs I:,s,,,; Sn'EGr ct. ,,,,c,. ~, ,,,.r
nskei Whit SEonon rali to this s,..
Deacl, objected, AMI Evara consrnlcl That l'c want.
ce1 to thuw That Il WAS a motive IF T'lt"nh "wn to
lleack 'aid admitting tut slo,,lton and 1.!!en wore
conserned III sh. TIC dcelara,ins ~ "f tsra ,r rary
for purposes q imlsacli'ent. THY tslenco IN tue
cass was TINT Monlton psnieal"l against Tion writing
nst rulAhng IT, Artl when 1t wis ttDns he bln1ncA
Yil!on for II. This was ~ aeio, entered nr1. n, BY
Tilton alne, and lcr.ceatetl y Mo,lson an. she.e
slc,,cr. After lko further argument o tho R,cct
Judge Nelson decided 70 r,ls y o'1t fnr TIC present
y s wness hat Man'o s hat e
w1elcd tn
ruT n1s.srrr AT THE HEAD or T1EE sr1n1ruALrHTs
they wcte far numerous than tho GatErc4a-
toMn1nr, nnd for this purpose lC had published tho
1c Of Victoria Wnolhnl n1'tl tho point on tas te*.
nlony tint Tiltol! assigns a. reason Tint which
aHseScrated by Sonor. ar. Eynrs said !in tlltl
not ca1l this Witness 10 contradict hnuiton Int t0
ehp,f Tiltons motive in wrflnA thu publication.
C0l,1iacA proposition u show t1at thu publication
not for ]rcrra Inherent, but for Ii!t9tH ntib.
tou 70 pnt himself at tho head Of tic spFitaa''s' Of
this country.
Eyar,s rrnI portion Of aroultons direct testimony
relating to thc publication Of tho Woollull alory, and
tho elurts nia,lu 10 suppress It.
beach replied to yarss. al said that The counsel on
tho other s1o nrg1c M II tIese twn gentlemen wcre
conspraors, when they were only work
luz together for common cd. Beach ufso
Quoted FHoM afoELT0Ss DIRECT TESTIMONY,
ami, In regard to which, cnu1e salts tcrc was no nct
to show tlat atolon c0ncurfet i'll this publication.
and sapt,royed 1t. Judge Neifson ruled TINT this
wisncfb cousi only l,1 Used in contradiction Of aiy
Thing atouon had saiG, and lo would he confined 10
| tAis.
Yhe w1trcsa then said: remember tic payment Of
$5,U00 Into tho Arln hut did not know 1t Dcscler
ton by Lin directions. Mouiton all MO ihe ne1s ay
q make check for Il 0oo to T. T., mud Charge II to
| Ills uanlc.
Thls ,vaa al. tho defense Lad to as wltncss, and ho
was n!lowcl to 60 without rEosa-o1n'nlnatun.
| CLEVELAND.
Eynr,s sa.l tlcir next wltntss Cleveland. au.1
II WIS lilo utir Of separation, le hu.0csctl
that ho Lu,tll not 1s calc.t until tomorrow. This
| waH coucurrel IN, atid tic Court nd d}o,rnct1.
| PROMINENT VISITORS
Among tho strangers I'll tue Court To-day was tho
Chicago Hospital Conmlraion, MCs,s T. G. cociEane,
Gen. RI, Il Eldrtdge, VI Chicago, sat with plaintiffs
| counsel,