, 1875-05-07
I dn not prnpo"e, howerer, 10 stop hare. This ln-

Ida not prnponr, however, 10 stop hare. This in-
DELIBERATELY VIOLATED.
II Eass The fowrr tD execute the ;cnlty for thfe
viii rnoss easurcily he done. The
gentlemen u the Common Cpuucil have acted dellb-
s pss: .4s . II @ u u paa.n
punished in proper sms, tPsnt .rpl'usc' which "ss
rnr crnoumsrAacxa
attending tho Issuance OF Tits injunction &pd a GtAo
lcsner, for Intend that, tar - an ct,uceraod.
tho fun'uuntt5 shall not ~ mfsinfofmed about thls
When ths application for this Injunction VA tnade
and this baooes very pefnsnt in the .tew tats nf
ihis c.sc, we.k aRo Ii. Moaday ths bni contained
suto Of ~ .nisne.lon immsd.a,sIi without nouee:
nud, ln tbs rier that It matter Of vary great In,
n hna srsa hs opnoa
uIon It al, snd dcstEel . b. infarnctl ~ far -
e9al IN r~s,t 70 shn srin Of shs b'-1 ssn. for The
sent for Mr rorrtst, ~he coud not h found At his
Office .eos toF u. dsfses rspts.sn,t.,T'. ~ q .hs
cana !nto Court.-ous Of ths ahs,t Representatives.
too. Of ths City aoyernment IN its legal department.
t 'a ss Y e.
Of lh!a Injunction. II vas ssid then aud there
"a. l. \. % !@PeFt:nt 90: Thsh r;a1
counsel fltr Xdafns and othsra uodsratood him. 10
say .h. 10 hai no objection to ths i..uance ot th,s
luUrt.On C1ilnP&l t4un84 AuH kAyR klAt
Va, nsuniera.ooj. sua am willing to ascspt that;
but tbs fact sill. re.nAns that counsel GAiF. Adams3
~ present md. 10 enj:csn as Ill TO as '..u.n.s
for shs foufa. ~. or ths len da,s asnply ~
~ tuso.s Of giving as s!ty sas right to !. l,a'd in
.euxhs Information. ea.' IT.: ely. rspIe.sst4ssss
til tntJ rams Into Court ucn ill ,noon no counsel
for the city had sseF tsht4 to b. hesr no Gus had
tAp}1v t,aIn In t1Rn
tho Junction ,nuIined. or 10 hare II dsaolvna TAs
i!meais:s Proceeding w4a 10 1r4nsfer tbs c-Es frnn
tni. ioFu" II ths ns"'p'psrs. II was argued "
the conronAT1oH NEWSPAPER
and sai !. aai sus Proeeed'n4* Of The eorporttton
ss ssp,ss s: & h y: !. .:sa
ss.'; ' a';S is'sss w.: 10,
esnnsese4 III tn. III oeay roush into
tls ea'e for srecal pfpose nd thsy with Two gen-
esn VITO Fc1EeAent the city, got together Aud cou1-
asl about this matter, aud
49, AprlsE TUE VIOLATION or THIS INJUNCTION.
They know, II tbs C1y uounc did not knox, that Al
auy ons,t hs ear. of this cours open 10 them.
snt they had right to know that At n,Y time. Il
saw that hal nials erEor, was ready 10 retreat
tsS,a 'ossa :. :ss. T. % fssass
upon iii. subject uadat these circumstances theso
Is EenteMoA sdri.sd ths a. MeorpaF.,on t9 1!sob1,
w.s 70 Intended. No other construction can b. put
upon tus letter: aud sn again reminded sa2: ! am
| tolu lEAk Lug proceedings VI M7 Nl3 l.tuGA
Contained ss letter aso to 10 no!!eel w tho court
NOW WHAT Is TUE Law .
in regard to ills inatter7 Perhaps senne Of the mtn-
ii tls City Council ass here, Ind should 10 very
Tus - cus ihs sn rad io following from High OF
Tas granting of m injunction being Justly regard
ell ~ of the highest IreroBAstvts Of courts o.
equity is most exact a,,t inpa IT ousdiencs is rs
ntirtI lrum those against whom tls maulate Of tha
tourt il Irn:ttd. win ul,Aessr Irregularities III.
nro:sedns' sa,y Ia an*etsi OF hox*ves erroa.ou.l,
ID tae ii .a,:auce il mutt bs implicitly observed n
lun5 lalt.a i'll existence, sud tho iac that It la
T. ss,o5. n IL, sa I9
issue. vii! nj es .lowe! 70 .iolAts T. on ths Eroun!
to tlecul,ts upon thu Intention o. decision Of th
Court. Or uren the e9ui.y ot shs e' Or 10 ane,tt1
Tue reason for ths suie u hero laid down. IL foun
In Tue nsscsstY Of preserving thu respect Rud oaad
ths s.ssoaa eoafus!ea rh!ea would usrts1!y r:
suit from allowing parties asatnst whoia IN n)uneson
p.s; ot tls ra.ef o. ths regularly ol ths proceed
ns' rsa tho nature ot tue ca's. ,f1e tribunal gram
ns Tho "t NUT tt.. b. II. aIbser nj IT. 1s.n
u ths sulle=.nasses, TIE fac. that i.s rserog.us
Injunction vo!a, bus, o. voiiahle. aud III
tii 1t Is set Rs!1a Isrokel. It /
nrore1ty oysr witch Il shoui not Lave Letn e1sudes
anor1p 10 excuse for its violation. tbs violation
an tnjuncton constitutes \ rr"'.mpt nf the Oou
from wh!th It Issued, and y epunshsd accort
iury Nor dpes the question ai 40 motive OF init,
VIII wlIc, the writ WIS u!tobeye1 klter or vary Il
rrtnonkOtittY foe ths violation On tbs contrary,
nv q ptatoi ~ cenernl rule that where Tbs writ III
Js:p duly served oii defendants thsy ara li4be for
viu!ot!ot III wAasayer 1uottys tueJ may hare actrt
u1t While ~ W have aeeu ID tho preceding section
the f.ct tint N INJUNCTION VII esronsausly itbuea
lis rst instance sIords 10 warrant OF skeuse 10 d
ftniaut for nrsach Of It's setins, ,st eueh fart
oruneEy bs taken into consideration In awarding pu,
lahnenst fur liz b,sach.
And il il sattl iu thts nams csnuect!on which
moat ahuialantiy lsus, thai na,t,ss exuuut sessa
thstnselyes rci,.nd she advice Of COUNSEL
r. Tu,s cnIfnr IN Jrn14nir r1nY
-, IL. n,ttar ~ nj. r,s. t;r, an. con,t =,
~ 81 ~ nruisl. thss ,rn.t Tiil:,i s. ysHnr =,
satn.r1 roussnpt: for i No! l.o.i,s,a ,o
ti,at ImsHsan turi.,,.uisncs has uuyt5 son ! sni
~
Ii in mid tia: thrrs vaa no 3us,sllctiou in Ii
c,s., md thn euunssi for tlia ctty huys TAI,
~. rsanorsil,fNy Of deciding thxf ouestit
. for the Court whpn they could hays We
] taa31y lad IL decided t,y tbo Court And the tl
sutb1r1tIss unou ts vArv utxbt befurs this iniuucti
80 al f,r Ieartnr d.Earatsty yloi1,ed IT, vbsn
l