New-York tribune., 1875-06-30
WHO sUBoRNED TIE PERJURERs'

,p. TI1roN AND ME-, MOULTON PRESENT AT TIE
MAKING OF THE FALSE ATFIpAvITs.
The LAWYERS of Mr.. Beecher who have
worked up the and procured the arrest OF Loader
claim sufficient evidence regarding the nanii
ttre OF these aidayits which to nlict several per
SONS and it understood that they will proceed to do so
at once The Assistant District-Attoney OF KING
Conptv Yesterday said the Grand Jury viii assemble on
uly and then 1t is supposed the injured persons and
their witnesses Will appear before 1t to lndct MI DANA
Mr. TiltOn Mr.. Moulton, and Loader.
Mr. Dana according to the belief Of the lawyers OF Mr.
Eeecher gas active in inducing Loader to 20 to MI
Morris TO make the affidavit, though it will be seen
below Mr. Dana claims that he took no part IN its prep
aration Referring the narrative published in yestc
days TRIBUNE. Mi. Dana said
This thing is very unfair. Nave avoided expressing
my convictions TO any Gne except my amiy am iIlnd m
ono outside, except in the one case o Mr. Shcarnans :
sisteI-nlaw, Who was engaged III dong some Sc III
about the Beecher Trial. nor any one aSC cOn1
his knowledge OF the affair. He at work
liking some curtains III house, and casually made the
that hc had to keep very Quiet for II it was Anown
thai he was in of certain facts relating IL Tie
matter he would be sunnC ed as witness on the tfliiI
She repeated the remark TO me- ana then saw nm ny
or two aiterward the subject aSAeu lni what hc
knew, when, with great Ieiu lance ne we sto!
that has since been published. ,skfd nm nn why NC n,
count OF his ad his amy-tnt FOR these rc;i-
n c colld moi afford to ulix himself up the matter.
lie itor said hc had not Oxen 10 me on the sloo'
Toll him considered it my duty to communicate the
matter TO tne plainths attorneys. and | dli
tell Judge Morris on the day the sur.rebIt!ai
closed 5ir Morris remarked that 1t was now too late
10 which replied, Very Veil, my duty in the nlaltrl
has been doue" did nOt Loader a.in until saiui,
day, June 5. when Judge alO'rs cilcc upon me 10 n
oui where he WIS sent fo iOaier whose store Is on
the next block my reside. CO. to come to my house.
did this because his store Is sich noc pace anu .s
Norris is 80 well known, supposed 1t would be more
agreeable 10 see him at my house, They mad Their
present, aud tlcn they both went away
s f al arTs n The S5 aaa wSs So made T'H Without
my knowledge advice. Wien my udine was cVibec. "a
with Tue transaction II The brooItgn AfgnS OF June ~
tooA pains Immediately to III ora Ju-o NoilSnh ai i
Mr. Eyars of my connection with the uansicll0n ana
aerward gave the same iniol lation To mr. snsarina.
Mr. Shoarman is incorrect when he says tOd MN my
wife knew about the whole transaction from LOader'
d not tel , Inn Mr. ssr sen ade 4nf 10 her bsOnoh ss have m
lust related, she In w ony what chcse 10 Ton her
tE, case either volunteer or otherwise. have carefully
avoided any conn ectlOn with H. communicated Whn
sldeIed myself bound in houor 20 do anu should have
been equally glad to furnish the defendants lawyer with
auytnng apparently advantageous 70 tAer sue Vi
The case ii IL had come within my knowledge
Mr. Dana stated further that understood Leaders
trial had been postponed Late the night before he said
Lander came 10 his house in carriage in charge OF an
officer stating that lie had been arrested ana asking
what he should do AS the officer refused 10 drive past
Jude Mors's residence. that gentleman was sent for
and about midnight they ali reached Raymond street
Jail Bail refused ana Loader was tIeIclore COLL
mitted.
Mr. Dana did not attend the trial OF LOADER he dd not
wish to have anything further do with the matter He
said he had sought TO keep his entirely out OF the
papers any way connected with the Beecher case
and now, by simple act OF courtesy on his part, IL
seemed he was likely TO get mixed up with the reot
There had already been many statements published in
which his name used that he thought was about
time he should make himself and he had therefore
hat hq nyht al do
Mr. Tilton was present the making, and the sug
gcston Of Mr. Morris remembered that he had had
pets laid the the time of the alleged acts
On Monday Mr.. luton told TRIBUNE reporter that he
had received singular confirmation Of Leaders story On
being pressed tell what this evidence was, he de-
clined t was learned later however that he had said
that lady had voluntarily informed him that she was
In his house at the alleged In 1862 that she ordered
the carpet to be laid and paid the BILL which amounted
to sS Mr. Titon added that Leaders books had been
examined and the entry found TO be the sum named
But IL now appears that Loader kept books and that
there is no such memorandum In his possession.
Mr. Moulton Is represented as having promised the
friend Mr.. Conners, who accompanied Price To bar
gain with Mr. Shearnan for hush money that he would
take care Price he got into trouble by corroboratng
Leaders affidavit. Whether any money was paid the
for this work is not stated by the lawyers of Mr
Beecher Actions for subornaon Of perjury however
threatened.
Mr. Pearsan, when questioned by TRIBUNE reporter
yesterday refused say anything In regard TO the story
Of the alleged evidence Of Loader and Price, MIR
Morris said in conversation that he had Oeen deceived
by Mr. Loader In the matter.
The original afdavits Of Price, Loader and Leys wert
filed at yesterday IN the Office OF the Clerk o
the CITY Court They were presented by Rnfus ~ VII
liams, clerk in the oice Of Morris Pcarsa, who Il
the Notary Public before whom the anidavit OF Mr.
fla 9TH wa