The anti-monopolist. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn.) 1874-1878, 1875-07-08

etter from the Editor OF the LaIe "esr
ern Times in Answer to personal ATTACKS
Made upon Him by the Nortn"es'e'"
chroncie-ALively Episte.
Editor Init Monopolist.
The last number of the n. "; chron-
;cle. a sickly sheet published IN 81
paul. deyotes a column ard hall eul-
toral notice of the suspension OF me
Western Times, and while IN tne
!, main it is but viruleht, ~,
ING and cowardly attack on the personal
character of the undersigned, editor OF
|. the Times, it closes with an uncharltapie
: f;nc at yourself, therefore / presume
yon viii grant me the privilege OF re-
nell,np. through your columns, the at
e, lacks Of the slanderer. The editor o.
e the Chronicle, if it can be said TO nave
20 one. in his clownish ignorance OF tht
common principles OF decent JOURNALISM
not content with announcing the suspen
in sion of the Times and arrogatlng L
!, himself and his Tag what OF gior.
~ and benefit there was in the fact, attack
r. NV personality as the conductor OF IN
nd latter PAPER. The Chronicle was 70
I. cowarily to attact the Times while
lived. but vu.ture like, it decends 10
tomb fo1lPrickings. 1t has not calculate
,ha risk OF its mission, tor it will nj
us that there still lives one who Will q
led fond the Times and the principles 1t e
Po- nunciated against all corners. But
ter ne listen moment to the howls OF II
i;.ararv iackal. He says the Tn
hoe died as it lived-an exhibition OF &c
ust ism and inconsistency" l defy t
ure rh.o,,,ce to point out one single expr'
SION Of editorial egotism in the one Ill
dred and fifty weekly issues OF the I'm
the mr. n single line inconsistent with anotn
I on Now. who is its accuser? man WI
y of ont brains or educations who cannot
a decent two line local notice, yet IS q
io' tistical enough to announces MINIS
nope editor and proprietor OF rehglons
sting per. that breaches theology on one
all and on the other publishes the most
bolical ISLANDERS against the rellgio
1eie nrotesses to defend; advocates tenn
ance for the sake Of intruding ltsen
the homes of most worthy cias
aa.es neople, that it may insult them with
Risky rartisemeuts and nauseous puffs oil
ough dooperies and whiskey saloons;
He fesses democracy in politics that u
n tnrn bIackmail democratic candid
: ana for office and at this very time advoc
that tho nominees of the secret enemy.
h for If the issue was between the Times
;s ca. tho chronicle would never write
of the letter loI ! c ss- oan,ra stad with
argu- o =, tho latter. leaving the reading p
y like to nudge between them. The Carr
most go ne, another word about the Z
but proceeds TO pour OUT tne Was .
wrath on myself, IN the VAN oei'e'
itizens the editor died with the paper.
day. One would live on forever, Uu. xss,S Az nj,
r1oauit And vet a man must feel little sore
ion of Tothink how he will suffer when he's
aN;1 ais; bonum" said the men Of yore.
ousand ssDs mortuiss but now ones tomb up
Of the Folks write foul WORDS IN nct ehsfe
&c g nylng
lowing Il charges the editor of the
ensuing with assuming to dictate 70 cieIg
laity and to force them to support
:. rnos lterprise that did not meet their app
rs - A lie on the face; for the Times
lin. its lists the most prominent ana res
temper clergy and laity from whom u
ceiyed the warmest letters oil ap
u navy and encouragement chiefly tor II
pendent and consistent action
ent, Fred | matters. This charge comes "
'rsAsuref, rr.c.. from the Chronicle when "
lrgan: lSt r,;na;,s rarx rorart ATTACK o.
stant p. ~ UNI ~ - - wonld
Chs. Nc NIT 10 be blackmailed out OF subs
monies, and when we remembei
against . u.s Inc little time 400. bee
{ Britain choose 10 criticise ! pubic edul
ng words institution.
atari oil Is says We (por0on De a0f 60