, 1875-05-07
Closing Argument Of Judge Lawrence for
tlo Complainants.
The Citizens Association viii Contest
Tie Election In The Circuit
Court.
Tho Aldermen Whiting for tho
Verdict.
THE CONCLUDING ARGUMENTS.

anxious to boar tho result Of tho atscmpt Of tia
cl,lzcns' hssoctetiou to cot All induction re.
s,..,rinr ,ho Common co,nc,l from doing any,
thing under tho 1ncorposAtlon net Of 1als'
Among tho p1olpinont cltIzeus prosont "ofo
Neyor Colyip, AID. Schairncr, Qui1k. Dixon.
W.rron. Woodmau, aud uopth, A, G. Hcsng,
!u1ius nosont'ln', Adolph Meses, tbs 1fou. s,
Thomas A. uogno' tho Lon. u y. caai"o!o' ',ie
lion. 1aaao N. Arnold, L. u. boomer, T. II.
Maeyeach. Il. T. Dericksou, John Forsytho,
citv.cIork Forrest, Duckuer's Mot1is, aud City
N.s AZ 'oen "a tho Court rns road, to proceed to
buanoss, -..-..-..
,, I. ~ Nv. ,as,.,oa y.d,,sd,r th,t
arose ana snid 1t was lns's.co "ouneSoaF 'nas
.s...,on ~ saos w. NJ, rnmniotr for i'm renaan
teseu.as'oA wa IVY s.,I,.,.., II. 49,.
that thero WAS no noslcs puDnsnea. 1e eou-
A. ~. ,,,a.t,o, n;,.+ Ia votod mn, nt +,,e
that that aheatlof' n'unt ne soteo oPo" ~ tno
ho quoted an authority, urging that, tho
,.,.. .s.,,,.,,,, w. n,,,.r ro,;.. m ~. farm
ous nv ~ ..s no.iea q, .o l.v
ron,coueut,v ,hcy lad notice of tho question
co''aoaue".' tuo' "a" "
JUDGE LAWRENCE
sh,u closed ths srgumeut tor tus comptaluants.
Iis said tho proceedings In tho case hnl boen not
!. NM. rrmsrnah]o, Ttey anpcnred before lis
:" "ss'e s..a.s .na.,1;n.. =, tr.t.,,;,ttn,,
which Ind b,en rocoru,zel by tl,e sunromo
can.t or VI. at,,. n simoat n1mto,loan c,uns
for the purpose OF Saving tbs rsopie Of ChlcaEo
f,o,, tha rerpatu.tion of A r., eat wroor. Kotice
uas si,an to tho sg.' representative. Of the city
Of the intended application. Tho bill vas road,
md Iii. Honor stated that ho dssi.ed to hear
from counsel for the city, aud tile gen"
fl,m,n uho snpcarod {Air. Adams, stnt-
''e""u Wv evr sas..1, ~.
both hs Honor and counsel for tho
comn1aiutnta. that liz thought tta bill upoa it,
f.oo made oaao for tbs equitable interference
Of tho Court, md that ha a.w uorea.ou why
such An Injunction as His Honor proposed TO or
dsr should not Ia issued. Thsleupon His Honor
e'0elsa "a.,,s.a - ~" 49,. ,.. ~ ~.
esrm1, would expire "lshan zen uhsa, nos nacanae w.
nis Honor e1pfssaed auy doubt - 70 III lis juri'dc.
Ra1ss b.sausa saa sAG i. s}s ts
.ttss ia a..,aln.tion q I'll. auest!ons pre. PRE-
vhish to coma isto Court @ sud move fos tns % d..
solution OF the injunction.
w,,,, w.. .,'t PIP b 1Msf 10 DO .ns .s,s .,
y na s1sy % amagins snas they wanla a nos feco1ys "
stcsd of dong that xctiur uuler this alyico Of
FL ,tsi .ithnnn ~ -. - sae .a S.s5 Luau
Who care tbeir npinfon ssanttetl il wnt IN npn.
son opon an a,, ensttaos auoetson' anu not uireos
aasco 70 o51L,ac1'nT ~ ioant n conso>
quencs Of tAat opinion. thoy ttho Aldermen)
deliberately disssEasdcd tho mandate Of tue
Court. II tho gentlemen fGoudy. Eto,4o eto,
bsd .reh rnnuG.nra In ths .onylnss. ~ thn;ss
nm sasn . n1e,....a Wsd.SsI.a =. =. tnoit
cahss ~ theJ Plotesssa MeaaosaaP 70 feoh-ll
sIov feaaJ tnuusat ~ aHs "as =, o.'l tne tx o.
ami -tIht Ills IIonor wn1 exercising 4 iu.
Fiediction which Was 90 clearly unjusti.
f'abe,-Hns IL not lItt]n romsrL !. hla
th,t +hs~ Aid nnt ror,n into corrt
snI ~. nm-,l,or ~ III. 1onor iusf.,a ~ -
.snr III conne 10 1iarer.rI tbs o1tipE of liz cort