The New Orleans bulletin. [volume] (New Orleans [La.]) 1874-1876, 1875-03-23
THE COURTS.

Mary Malady VS.. William Malady ct a.
= Judgment amended
Union National Bank vs. W. H. Cooley e
al. Judgment reversed.
Thomas H. Hunt vs.. Mrs. A. O. Graves
} u grnent reversed.
Mrs. 5. G.. Lane vs.. J. g. Clark. Case re
manded.
Isaacson, Ssixas & Co. vs. j. E. Wilson
Judgment affirmed.
James Phillips VS.. J. H. & E. E. Smart
Judgment affirmed.
; State rs. Il. II. Willers. Judgment af
firmed
James Philips VS.. J. r. Smart. Judgment
affirmed.
Mrs. j. Armstrong VS.. the Estate Of E.
Philips. Motion to dismiss overruled
Safe ex rel John Coleman, Judge of the
Sixth Justice Court. Prohibition granted
BY JUSTICE TAIIAFERRo.
| Succession of George and Francis Clark.
Judgment affirmed
! Mr.. Semple VS.. ?. Buron & Co. judy
ment affirmed.
Christopher Hun: VS.. John Mayo. Judg-
ment affirmed.
c. E. Alter vs. J. McCullen. Judgment
affirmed.
! J. W. Banning VS.. Il. Bleakley / Co.
! Judgment affirmed.
Mrs. Z. NJ. Halsey VS.. Po S. Sandidge ct al.
| Quiz ulSMl>Stli.
Lacy & Butler VS.. Mrs. J. H. Gordadenne.
Judgment affirmed.
J. F. Riley VS.. heirs Of Mrs f. NJ. Riley.
Judgment affirmed.
A. Rousseau VS.. Babbadied Motion to disc
miss overrued
J. NJ. Cass VS.. ~ 0. Times. Rehearing re-
tusedo
HY JUSTICE MORGAN.
State of Louisia Ia VS.. Peter Marcyo .5udg-
ment amended.
J. A. Mathews vs. P II. Kemp ct ais. Case
remanded.
State vs.. Hobt Williams. Judgment If
tirmed.
o. Theriote VS.. sio Lyon. Sheriff. Judg-
ment reversed
State ex rel f. f. Chubbuce VS.. the Judge
Of the Superior District Court. Mandanlus
granted.
o. Gs Burbank vs. William Harriso Judg-
ment reversed and case remanded.
State VS.. Joe Gindry. Judgment seversed. !
G. Is. S.iget VS.. Co Pe Huntington. Judg- |
ment reversed
T. Mal!ard vse John Rhodes Judgment
affirmed.
r Francis Us. Mrs. Mary /. s1artin. $50.
ton to dismiss overruled. 7
Mallard vso John Rhodes gudoment
affirmed. !
P. Borland VS.. T. Leckis and Sheriff.
Judgment reversed.
Millandoa vs.. Carringtono Judgment
affirmed
BY sgsTIcE WYNN
Succession of WillamssBobb. STotion 90
dismiss overtuled.
Chism & Boyd vso p J. Lefebre. Gehear-
ne refused
Mrs. A. Simoneau VS.. T. Z. Hullum. Sheriff.
Judgment affirmed.
n | n
nent affirmed
B. G. Soule vs.. y. Dudoussas e. AZ. JUDY.
lent amended. t
c. A. Drake G. ais. SIS. Thos J. Hays ct ais. I
Judgment re served. "a
D. d. Wood 4 Bros. vs. Beais 4 Lane f
Judgment reserved. q
n o.. Jackson ana Great Northern Railroad @
5: Louisiana Levee Company. Appeal disc r
lisSed "
Harriet G.. Adams VS.. e. W. Adams. JUDI S
lent affirmed.
\. Bienyenu vs. J. L. Lala1fis Judgment :;
tfirmed. i
Chisna * Boyd vs.. Freres Brothers. Suit .
ismissed. {
Geo. Lyle ( Sons VS.. BeaYs & Laine. & ais. .
Judgment reversed. -
BY JUSTICE IuDELISCo ~
Succession Of Elliot. Eehearing refused.
Payne, cameron 4 Co. vs. Eaton I; Barse j
w. Rehearing refused. $,
L Stearn 4 Bros. W. G.. c. Packard. re- te
caring refused. 81
United States Cireu, Court. 81
The Pennsy lvania Salt Manufacturing Com W
any have filed before Judge Woods a bill in ia
lancery against Frank A. Behan and ". f. tie
tane praying for an account and writ of
junction. -
The bill sets forth that the company is the r
Fner OF patent for q new and useful i'm s.
ovement for putting up caustic alkali. and 20
at the defendants are now infringing the de
me by manufacturing and selling this pro ar
ct III this city. Breaux, Fenner and Hall bl
pear for the Company. VS.
superior District Court. lie
In the case of Teutonie Insurance Company gu
Thos. OConnor ct ais. in which the ques- ST
n of using the Babcock Extinguisher in the
re Department was involved, Judge Haw- wa
IS decided as follows his
It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that ira
} writ of injunction herein issued be made to
rpetual and that the Board of Metropolitan be
lice, Thos. O'Connor, Chief Engineer of he
} Fire Department OF the city of New Or
MS, and the Flremen's Charitable Associa- -
II be enioined and restrained from carving -.
force the resolution of the Board of Dele %
es or Directors of the Firemen's Charitable ~
prevent the Babaock Extinguisher from al. al;
inlng to fires and to send them and men p
rking them to prison, and from arresting n''
lmprlsoalng any of plaintiff (Teutonic ., roo
urance Company employees for lawfully "1''
ng Babcock Fire Extinguishers at fires in -,
city Of New Orleans, aud from interfering ",
h said employees of plaintiff while using t e."'
eXtlnguishers, as long as said employees ~ In
not Interfere with or impede the action of va
officers and nemsers of the Fire Depart A"t
at.
Fifth District Court. no
udge Cullom yesterday decided the !
owing case, which Will doubtless be of 3
rest 10 many: car
. c. Wilker,on, Agent, vs.. NJ VI. Samuels. ave-
$ case is before me on rehearing, and CAr
authorities to which counsel reters have the
n read with care. It can not be denied 3,
the sale of property belonging to another :, =
son IS null C. G, Art. 2452 But the lei
Stion IN this case lies behind this 4 Glu
10 forte is hired to Mrs Ella Blanche i ID
YES on the 9,h of December, 1872, and on ~ -, :
IfE ~ -, ~