The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-01-28

from those which say that ececsiasca authority
so@e' ,or from above we obey It In tina,
safth Ihs, only person who claim. OF Us among al
The a IN %
II" sn our for aoT 9s @ ss% s osS
, ,hs WAS he who made the vasan and no,
Can IN any civil unctionary in The sesimen,
pS nv Sfn tho hands o our as
SOVEREIGN: Of the Archbishop ANTE bnry the
sss "S' sssIs al
any one could and i should be Mr. Gadstones business
Pope first OF all to away tho, the bible
With reference TO the possibility OF collision be-
tween the Holy See and the civil power he
writes:-
and hs che y See
srsSsns mistakes. but my you question ali along lies not
% @ :' the hess
sm"es 1s nas s s ss
rule Sad been oSsery !as dhealiy @ cs.SSles il
TIE have Mnss Others
rss be,mesn the two coordinate
movais the causes offence. acts OF restitution in
actual collisions there are conferences eomnromIses
such neither party gives up abstract rights
Ds hs Ss Ss sss
not ' up s' Ss iii
y1n draw nsl Is PIE line between your domain anu
h .s
Amer RI an, CYL war we hnd aciea within our rgs
10 draw the line between the ropcs domain and the
Ss lS sd IN and NEW n
nn Inc me OF ne n nG
Mr. a 1o srv Saa s s 10
they took part WIN Their own government: The
%n o G SsI na s @
was greaD; but they were not considered have
we went TO war with Russia the English in st. Peters.
f. as s s1 ss sy psa sSys
ans G ES1a
sT 70 s %
Gano;s %oqd , DC VERY naisnan gnSy Mould aSe
ss ali sonstits!iopal means 70 hinder e but who be
eH%ra lon s Wat here % IL has
BILE nature any more than loyal Germans had they be
would not renaush Their to tee coS.
try Mr. Gladstone. were he consistent. would at once
On the same subject, further on, he writes:-
When, then, Mr.. Gladstone asks Catholics how they
sasy Of sf 'Ss
na 10 oney the mat but s s9 70 o r n
world without sScsp!Ions and i either the pone the
%o pa s an sMs OF Sn nH
and human society give an absolute obedience to
me- IN contrary ways Which, in this age Of the world
to h ts T ss@ MSs SeySsS
rule, and must be DECIDED on its own merits
n %h hs w Se% Of na IT.
myself by my own Judgment and my own conscience.
twill III be Objected thai am after all having re.
S 70 s e SGcs % a s
ment is our ordinary guide in religious matters; but
rare, nay. Impossible emergencies
In chapter on
CONSCIENCE,
moi
vicar OF Christ" he says:-
G pu.sSs r.: ses
Ike sp
lis % NOR IN ii. pubic S'' poiay Let tit be
found him here.
The next subject which he discusses Is
THE ENCYCL1CAL OF 1884,
and IN discussing ne adopts o little OF the tn
Q,tO1ue style OF argument. Tie says:-
VIII. Who will say that the plea OF conscience was as
o years as9 Of ssaS . or M
press always that wonderful ehew'room which 1t has
sd e The k
st w ss the .na s
parks at the mercy OF sunday mamie siaiions Could
took or ASsisms scieniic assemble and artisans
in the centres Of s1 ISua public
AGAINST religion natural and revealed AZ now Is The
better now We We're them " II the he
make Of the o ChurSh ANA naS been 50 from
Tradition OF 1900 years All this called lory,sm
and eviled.
This argument he illustrates and enlorccs at
some length, but admits That the old theory OF
tOryiSm has gone to pieces. mot q hundred
Popes," he adds, ''coud have hlndered It," And
then comes the following short. but striking pas
sage:-
The Pope has denounced the sentiment that he ought
to come 10 terms With progress End the new
WI guide other Fopes Plus goes Is He has
eip,e more tina than DO none mourn for instance more
ssas tire 81 her great S
medleval motto, dominus hiu.a'natio men and with
College a But cam ~e ao
ALI sps si IN H. hnSa
that religion Is spiritual loyalty, aud that 9ihoicity
iuries To- come: there may Ic found out some way Of
promise with progress" and liberalism"
He proceeds to argue, with great skill, that all
A REIMBURSEMENT TO SOME EXTENT OF LIBERTY.
ana observes that Catholics IN England are denied
examples OF this, and one OF them viii excite some
surprise ON the otner side or the Tweed:-"In
Scotland we cannot play he piano on Sunday,
Dr.. Newman has evidently been misled here, and
his mistake Will bring TO mind Mr.. Buckles famous
bunder regarding tue Scotch last day. In refer
enCe TO the Pope's condemnation Of liberty, ne
adds that 1t Is merely denial OF II as UNIVERSAL
The proposition condemned he says, is cit
Is the liberty OF every one TO give public utterance
IN every possible shape Ivy every possible cnance
without any let or hindrance from God or man to
all his notions whatsoever"
DR.. Newman next deals with
THE SYLLABUS,
and his argument on 1t Is some hat remarkab BILE -
1t is he says lot Ct errors condemned In various
Pepa nllocutions encyclicas and like oocumens; out
there Is not word III 1t Of the Popcs writing. The
syllabus Is to he received with profound submission
having been sent by The Popes authority 70 the bishops
OF the world 1T certainly Indirectly his extrinsis
sanction; but nrinslcally and viewed in ITSELF, IT IS
an ANONYMOUS writer There could be nothing on the
the face OF II TO show that the Pope had seen it,
page BY page unicss ul "lmprmatur.' implcd In the
Cardinals letter. had been an evidence OF tnis.
1t has no mark or seal put upon which gives direct
relation TO the Pope. VINO is its author ONE select
theologan high Official doubtless. Can it he Card
nal Antone himself: No. surely ANYHOW It is not
it is not do not speak # had any diinculty rec
ognizing and condemning the errors which II
losues did the Pope himself 6' me. but he has
yet done aud he cannot delegate his ndgiterum to
another. wish; with st. Jerome, to speak with the
assent 20 that which ne Pope propcunds In aith and
morals; but IL must nc he speaking ohcaliv, personal
and Immediately, and'not any one else who has "a hold
over me.
Alter this Introduction he proceeds to explain
away some OF the concentrations Of the Syllabus.