Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1875-02-12
the Archbishop Of Paris. and the Chief JUS
tice,
rlltOn looked with glance Of pity at
Evarts for showing such ignorance atou,
| HI, t-rN

TIE CATHERINE CAUNT LETTER
sent over TO the Graphic Office to be litho-
graphed, but whether it was Autographed
or not DO not know (Shown number Of let
ters.) | recognise these as in the writing
of MIR. Maverick, but there is nothing to in
dicate that these contain anything of the
Catherine Gaunt letters. After the orig
inal statement was published | examined
my manuscripts and found some errors in
1t, AID also my impression IS that there
were some omission in the first of the Cath
crime Gaunt letters. These omissions did
not strike me as being important with "a
gard to the truthfulness of the letters.
Mr.. Eyarts read q copy Of the letter in
question which was dated 29,h Of June u
explaining that through the reading Of,
Catherine Glunt her eyes had been opene
and
SIZE HAD sEES HER SIN.
she Jaw now as never before the wrong ,bs
had done him and asked his pardon. She
felt prepared to renew her marriage VOW
with him, and never before had she tel-
like this
At this point Of the reading an Grgume,.
was raised by the counsel Tor plaintiff a. t..
the correctness Of the copy of the le,,e-
written by Mr. Maverick ard read By W.
Egzrts.
The witness said had every reason q.
believe that the papers from which the d.
ter wss read by Mr.. ETarts was Mr. Nav-r
ick's copy which handed to the inves.iga
ting committee. The original letter / k5,-
myself carried TO the committee al p,
Mrs Tilt0n's letters but they objected p.
the reading Of them on the ground tia.
would take too much time, and Mr. Via
low was appointed committee % ar.-.,.
and read the letters. This letter W1. -'.
read before the committee.
MIR. Evarts here continued the -et'.r,.
the letter in question until is enI W.
ness then continued | wrote The l.-.a-
Senator Carpenter for Mr. W91ft,H ~.
l4th amendment. The biography ~ w.
Woodruff was written by me in the ~
TENDER following my Wit in Nay d HI.
same year 10 her.
Mr. Eyarts asked the wines 90 listen ID.
what he should read, AMI state IL that VI.
his expression.
Mr.. Beach objected TO ihis As .. ,.
quoted from the life of Mrs. W11lh-u --4
another argument ensIei.
Tho Judge finally ruled q, nta .+.
answer 70 this question VI. lr.r.s -.
p portion of the preface O. ttcI.g..t H.
Woodhal, and asked witrc-- b b. ~.
that, and he replied thar lie w-l,s r .o-...
month Of September. three or f,,- nm
after he became acquainted with brr H..
portion of the letter read stated rb9t,-
(the auth0r) Wa going o. as-r,-s -ls rir.
Of young woman
WITHOUT COLOR Or I.N.-
who was an object of Interest 2, b-- ...r...
citizens in her w1rk 1i The greatest -sf.-,..
Of the age, and woman abb had ri. irf-
authors entire respect. O-ler portion. --
the work were read. the most part of ttaa.
being recognized BY the witae-- s.. a.-
written by him, though be SAID ttay w-
opinions and tcnets held hy Alr- Wood.
VI illness was shown Graphic AMI % -..
this was the only paper in which be D.
lishei g fac smile OF the Catherine ts.--
letter. The paper was dated Se1-. Is.
and the witness stated that he furnished Oh
letter for publication himsc.t The Wins
then resumed.
After this publication OF N--. Ho..a...-
lite. Do not remember II p, uelcI1.1- V--.
sold. / could not give the >;e!uW.v H..
speech now from memory. / -s-l..lc- -a1-
some persons in the gallery tiled g. ir,c-
rupt the lecturer and | s,ep7oi nrTlrih7f
made some remarks. | cannot say q. yle-
portion Of her remarks that he s-le-
arose. did not have slips % beg =-c-.a a.
ny hand while she was te.-vr.--
do not think the cad
iished in the Word attracted %.
attention 10 nv family or - VI. Ee-
and | DO not think Il attracted any a.---
ton. After this there were some plh-ta
tons in the World which p0iltel.y reia7--
to Mr. Bcecher, No public attention Vs..
attracted 70 my family OF 20 Nr. Bee
by this card. published the poem
''siR xARIADU6Es MUSINGS
in the Golden Age with nj nGmel. -.---.
% il. One stanza in the poem rl.--
personally 10 myself. and others also IN
modified form. The whole poem ezQr.-
broken hopes and blighted pr0Spec--
disappointed man, whose every path -.-
have led and kept in continued success. i.
was heedlessneSs on NY part in laylr- '--
poem before the public. and | never iu-.r.-
Cd by i, to cas-: any sur on her name l--
| supposed that the publication Of Chi
poem would have injured Elizabeth ! won
have
Cu- OFF w RIGHT HAND
leiore | would have published it.
samc motive led ne 20 publish it that lea
me to publish everything that | write.
was absent On q political campaign whc-
Mrs. Woodruff threatened 10 make L-
statement public | never have had ur
communication with Mrs Woodruff since
April. ls72 Adjourned.
NV YORK, Feb lO.-S0thins IF m.
ance was ELECTED IN the trial to-day, OPP g,
the recess, Mr.. Evarts questioning Il;..
chiefly about bis association with Mr.
Woo lhuI, his ability 70 write short hand
aad his domestic relations. After the -5ee-
Tiit0n said
| do not rsmemb5rany charge being mal-
against me IN an interview between BIwf-
and himself whore Oliver Johnson was p-o.
sent about what occurred az Norshplrt
MINI. | was there lecturing about .y
seven years ago and never rememb,- az.
charges ever being made about my c1uGI.,
while there. Mr.. Beecher met me ac G..
house of Moulton when ne (Nl0ultonl w.
sick Mr. Beecher saluted Ii.to1 with
Kiss on TIE FOREHEAD.
Alter any period OF Extravaganza l--
Beeche- and ne occasionally sl.l,ei 1u-
another With 2 kiss. it Wa nJticatle
event when it happened. DID TO, know
when tic name OF letter Of cJntritau
was gwen 10 the letter OF Jan. I. ISL.
At this point the testimony reverted O.
the Woodruff publication o: the sclniA-
and letter of Mr. Beechc-'s was intrllac
ed expressing sorrow for the grelt wron-
done Mrs. Elton. Witness SPOKE Of hi-
visit % Mr.. Halliday did not remsmher
telling chat gentleman there was
NO. = WORD or TRUTH
in the Wooihull a-blielti0-, bat mag have
done 50. Ref ~ 70 the true story,
called, IiltJn said ID host of lis kn1wle-
it was destroyed by N-s. Til;0l long
Did uJJ show this paper to NJ. Pa
the artt.t but showed 10 @ B
F. Tcac, and Mr.. Woodruff. Hll H-
remember ne he showed It - Nlu--
but II was -,ft in his possession. pa
show il to James d. Nix but though BE-
showed F. &. Carpenter the original u-a
script. Showed the previous 90 Csru-
draft Of the paper. the matter Of " li.' ..s
the same Is contained II pamphlet. .'-
Storrs and read him the whole OF il. N1sr
Of no copy Of shat paper being Ia eEi--e-,-
now. Read the completed Yapc. O. Tracy
in Mr. M0ulton's study. betweeA Christ
mas and New. y ears or s. lizzie .1---. u.-
NOT show him anything but the clIp-5.e-
paper. When NC had the iut0rviea 3,
gether. in November. did not show 20,
the draft OF the PAPER for it was 4at the1 r.
existence, but Mr.. Mor.,on showed the
LETTER Og CCNIRlrI0N
OF Ai. Beechor. Mr.. Carpenter aa, ll en-
try in his memorandum book show n that
the copying OF the d-af, wes Gu.>ie M ths
day si;er Christina
The substance Of the tettlmJas iss
already been given, and dos %, d.1ar
from what has been published time sni
again. Adjourned
Starving kaz,-4
We publish, by request. iae following
letter. from wh.,h At appears that the desti.
ta,ioa n Asrsas IS by no means wholly "a
ileg5I, as yet.
GREAT BEND, KS, Jaa IS. w.
NJ. 4. r. S0q,.ldiaJ
DEAR SIE.-The people q our froaus-
County, having waited lcaz and uatient',