, 1875-03-03

b,s3 goods to be shipped 10 him a Albany; IN doing
u ia, = ss4s. 9:a = ..ii tlst j. 4 ens.s.a
cstns auel cotnmctcn IL would seem that a,lcll PR
ss !" ssss. n s TT s ssr sg sss":
mi surlo*e citizen Of tie s!ac Of New York applies
tos sdi,.v' ia'a .satrs r ss sy Il sions 70
eitizrn II tbo un!it etatea contrad.tins snslt,l
fnIm * right u c,sxen ot tho stats of Now York
Az to common carriers hsvo before said, The pTo.
Visions II ihts bill might bn auasined II colncI 10
surh rersons engaged in s'le bulirct
hi Il. prosisos n tho lii Ira % rot 10 resriee
Thc bill tnrtrs caro- of transportation between Nav
Sss end xsw vel :. e IT, iii
sous aaa freight. -
rilR MONT 70 BIT ON 1unr1s.
There il no doubt Of the power Of Co,urens to pro-
vila WIN shall 10 cglbe to terro as jrarH in Fed:
era! Court, and haa already declared That eolorcd
groyilo Who shall e. .itsh!e 10 servo urars In
stato Const7 Let be borns In mind that II IL not
Unitrd B,ases te Right of ria befors jury con.ti.
tte, In particular WAY, but 10 10 citlxens Ut
Tho United state; tls raht TO serve n Jurors y st:s
Tho Supreme Court Of Tho United States, in tho iGt.
Of wal!acoh t!eports, lage 49, decided t.t citizen
iiro % M attorney in tho courts Of Slate: sn speak
tHg Of the Fourteenth Amendment ~ Affecting luis
=. 11 regari 10 that amendment counsel for ths
1ainIia ii tie Court truly ta,a ta.t Tiers are certain
privileges aud ntnanit!es which belong to citizen Of
srSro rS cfsSd far ~ Fmreeh bmsnnsps 10 nrob'bt
aats from alEidging tcm and 10 rrocccs 10 arB''e
WHO no.ss.srs liz reu,hc learning and character il
ons u thoas E'gh!. Which State may no. deny. T.
M % VIII T. lin "S to @
End immtnj.ies beionrnr to citizens Of ito Uuitcd
s.io, IL Nv fe.!ion eha5ae!sT .ai ilat i Z
sbrgc Dut lis right 10 adntssou to practice iu the
Courts Of State Il nut QUO of .he.o. 1hla right In
Batcs. Isut on whatever basia ihis right msy 10
paceI 10 far as it can hayo sny relation to citizcnsp
would rslso 10 cltzenrp Of iho Htstc. aud as 10 Fed
eroI Cor II would rcals to citizenship VI tho Uui,cd
States"
A. snch to bs admitted to practice Law in state Court
upon what ground Gun II 10 tnata!ntd that Il ID lilo
IN Jury of State Colr7 Juriea In State Co,rta per-
form 'nvet important fuuct!aa IN Tho .dm'nstratson
s Gy ae sas hs s r
cArsctta for instance was right whch pestalnc to
citizen Of tha una Btatcs aae, then would follow
Of Ses Yorf or m e.tornis M would have a. nel rgs
serre a. juror IN tue Conrta Of MAtsachnacsN y
citizen ot ths United States Fesdng In Tut State:
shan b Of her Own teiizens shows that such eosvee
pertains to czennhp Of that State, and not to citi-
zcuship Of ths Unlted sates. / prealn,o mat no
viii pretend that C1ngrcss could pass law r61uIr
ing TIT shs Ha;o = ssless e her,
j,lzor tp Massachusetts wera right pertaining to
. citizen Of tho Un!iod States - sl.cll.
MI. MonToNs nrArEstEHTs KEFu1Ep.
The seuator from Indiana CIR. Mo.ton> maintained
That rrnr Womb t}o rutti tlo eouel nrotsctlpu of
sLs sxs II Ia wsre deu,ed tNs ab. t. .erye p Jury.
II excluding person from tho administration Of fna-
tica 10 dental Him Of the equal protection OF the
sequence follow from ill., exclusion from tho Legisia.
tura which makes tie laws, And from tho Dench which