, 1875-06-18
THE QUO WARRANTo.
Indigo Booths Decision on tho Motion
to Strike Out the First and
Second pleas.
To netorthincs IL Let 1'IlbIh
Stantl-.-'flle Demurrer.


,. .,o''' ...,,r,in, ,,,ro Ti,o ,,,,,,a,, ~. ~.
cued last Saturday, whun Tho Court took tho
80 ,,drr naviucmnut lila ,nj,i,n ,vaa NJ fol-
,aa eaou .11s' '' 0s'"'0'' "'@ - -
:, 5unoE poorn.
1ha.e mol ,ten able wIux 10 ihc rressuse nj o.let
nut h.ye coins to a c0lu!uson Witch srems 10 be
IN nc"fapco with ths lsw Of ,hs Slate TI.is il an
ttnn ~ Menry w " " H,np niy.r In CouFs to kn"s
tnat tle CITY Of Chlcaao munletpaI corporation IN
tae county Of Took for seyen days ~ mora l'aa Iee
sho % lIsrttcs. pfi,ileae.. functions, and ir4l'.
etrsoratiou Of c.te. and siilagcs," saora IN ISL.
n lie daae, and prnitlltco OF the city and reole
and ,g4in.t Tho le.es ana dignity Of t!s sans, .n
y Of i;bfc.en npswer to tho ls., II i,y What wurrait
Il clasn,s to nse ,rfo irancLi,ss. 70 As nforastso,
rsInI,1eut :, Ina iin,1
r,1nrr p,p4s
Tim g1s I. zcnrra, dsn,a1. Tl.e nort mica ia roote
traverse Or p!ea ly way Of jstificntiu but aa Tho
Qtcsicn may ro.ao Up III ui!Ieres share, will not
c.pre*s any uEiuivn in regard 10 tho hut-
esns} IN Witch VI H.; s psa 1s s,es % noo ss H.
ground Ut having heh tn election In accordance with
ihr aforessd statute, mud having ulus acquired right
thereof.
IL sha tho peopto by their atto1uoys have entered
nralKE THE F1l,sr AND sEcoNp PLEAS FROM TIE
PILES.
@ Nv, ~, e ~ ~, hrs w.
tn,: hsunh tbs arst snd ACCOM-, nea. srn tnromsst.
M Til. ill., ih,r ties hcsssa s,} nrsi mi soo',,
] Il y tat ,a.nts tht ,hs ,yts ns 11ha anu
cTrsInp ucttios unor sn v yirt,n nr 4hr sfstus NJ
ls9 ILs real g.oaaa .aloss !. e.nl,o!is4 4 "a
tnt"rwat,nn rrnrac,inv umnn In a,pnsnnlIn ~ trt
tus rjs Of lv il e,lc s.st tic respouSnt csn pita @
I'M os rca Ind ,hat ,les ,nMst na rihnr dfsrnim,r
f. e. se s.t .nsa a@ .'ea apon s II,
1nsa i rata ns - oe .oo
crtnnF to .."rs,sc rasai r"rne,tvs n III.
Ter. unsoultedly a eonl,non as1!f !. VA tona With
nat an, H. .cso. ~ M or g gss
RI . @ t. "tn, S ~ ~ u n ~ eot
~ ~. .I,ras ~ .hau. ,,ts. IL shniJ ill., s,s
ro,,rt AMI so]sirn liz authority ali rinhI ~
eru1ssina III ireh a. ths 1uvs1 a.. "
ohon r. Stt. aniiMt1v ~ .ssume: - ,arjs
'ao" " ~ua' ,er,S.,,ss ~ ~ II.
..,o,,,,,, l., ~, -y.o.i ~ ~ a,,T..,
setwse a iiyaasi tua saereana sne
Il n n,e hi i. snca ~ y
never ulaJa MY diiteepuco Ut common lsw-whener
the franchise was exercised by uhtuzal nrsh-
eal person, Tho prncueo il Just As same. Whether
.ss r,sani[sa .,t TO- Soms INTO court an! etlsr
fos n4src1sIue t.u fsnehIxe in nue.on # .his
tss. lItrGfnrs atnod uuer the rnIr 0f rnsrnnn i,r
should harc no hesitation whatever, and would Le
ltoareI to dsedu II At sus.slnng thls motion
but l hlse lcen -0
LOOKING WITH BONE CARE At oun STATUTES
upon TIC subject and eatcials " tho decision tn sp
w hala os tas tasTea &C eta1ny r. loes yefy masl
ma al III sosa 40 un tn1 o a o. M e
ri cet,rinsi ,,roeeeiinua. and fnate tban et"v.yr
civil questions.
III suplp7t OF thIs view tbs Court read
FROM Sec. II Of tho Practice net. 5ut con'iu-
uod Il Z poss'Lls 70 construe THAT statute 10
a. ea,o a1 ~ ~; fa9s - 20 ~ sa uuer 'ao common law
cecdtnx but # sersiy 1oe raosra sen," atrs,pnr
If tGe iansuauu u t4o staiut4a sons tnt rectnc in
thlt kng. meaning which does NOT seem 10 stsnd
forth upon tAe fAeo q to obtain such eonAlucun
Tho atet view *on1d seem TO 1e TINT tac plcadinx
as.nuFE9a 70 dha pst:ion should 20 y ID other
esn3o sct .2os ,,s" e axar Gs He Vuo VAT
esnes.ilr Tia asvent porton Tna s,ns.'., shnoana,
U9urt IL their nariy decisoas witch yrfs rcferr. TO-
have spoken of hote proeeednxs cro,'ua proceed.
ings, aud 4er language would seosn 10 learc douLt
- 20 what w s'ew Of that court van 70 rendering tue
dess'sh' G ss "a sat H. easS ne S!se Or nsrma
nn. s,m5 sa4 Ia ia tns. ,rsw3s .uS .aa ~ III
lrco,,"s thcy U.s ythont crv urnt,asa.In Jsens as