, 1875-12-03
THE COURTS.
Tic IIHNl;ln Petition Of u Dis
satisfied Creditor.
Dspssiting Court Moneys...Tho Gage
Parmolce Suit.
Record Of Judgments md Now business.

p.,ord nr JuInrcntu nnd No,v nuqinnxa.
: sha ehi' n'o' ,,.', ,n, "a a.,
1T ,.r '.'' w. ." r,.n', ~ ~" 70. 's oe"hn' -
uso''''o st"..,, m1N.., p =, -. Wv
Na''s' .'p. s'Ns 'ns y. 10 :, .e noo'
C1nn' A ~ o,,,., s' " ,s..,.,'. ~ :. H..
n'a's'''oa .,.,,. ,,s ,..!s =. .,,,, =. 49,
t'o an.o ~. .'d.. ~ .n.t, w. Te,,,,s,x ro,str,
lo'"' :" o.I., .,a,, .,.,'a,..a. ..,...I
NV 1.,.a t,.,,f' nd a;rc.l;,a ,t,n n,v,,n,,t ~
~ G .reonnt ~ y,,tar f,,n,o l. cn ,ud liza I.t.
INV T., 49,. o., ,,Huor ,,, w.. ,nro,,ra,,, y.
''t =. =, ,,,ro,sto ,, ,,,a rn,o. ~ N. u.t,.
so'|'"s" '. ,'e.na,,,. ~ ~ ,,,n 1,nso,rnr
i ''"0 ~ ,,.,,, r,nnrr.
,;a,,,;sf.a =, .,i,,r ,,o,,.,, ,y,,,;,,, n.r,.
ss,,t,cn ,o.,or,,,v II, ,,,o 1;,,,,,t ut.t.a
Iea a.E.,. f,,ri aoM.,1t a. n Iisnr, .1,n,an it,.
.ns +, tI,nn, n n W,t,,,t ,,a T. iInn.
'o'f a,t.n tor a r.,oivar an, ,,,,.ao,i., IT.,
No, .',snsnt c,,o,.,ca fin, T., ,,nn 1s.,
%.nr. n,rre,t J. "a, vcro crrore, IN
a.. n.. .;nt and e]esa b,slno7s in IN, city md on
Tho lssb day Of that month mado m anaigntncns
of ali tLcir rrnpc1t; tu H. T. Wright fyr the
t,,,tt NJ their ctotitor6, ThcIr N,,.LlItics wero
sr.o lsas" q, 80, ,I,.i. ,..,,, o,c- ..n OK ~
sl'ts'<'@'' a"u '"sA "ss''' S'o'' 4'-'o' s"o
tcmT!abaHt Geln4 c1so!tor " lhc atHuuHt ot
eH5g1. httes tho neBlgnincnt tho neE1 made 4
rronosit,on to coEp.on,iso At 80 coasa On tho
soi,r which uAs ecceEtod by al b,,t COMPLAIN
u9'.'' ...s alias .v.,,,,n,n T.ov,. ~. oa,,
~ anu t"o o''!e' e'."'s''.' t"e".s %. eo4''
VIE 10 b paid IN cIhts, nnH noteH given for tho
| rn1atldoy. Complainant alleges Tint II waa tho
,,utss3 osteeunc1t that all tho Gre isore 4louil
',4 '.y ~ .,,,ro.it;on rcroom.,t ;, ,,p,,c- II
| wy. '''' s. 49,. ,''..,,
aodine, aps' thns hos he'hg 'ao eaao' 'nas tno
agreement is null mud void.
| Tbe Assignee, however, tenls puFacbslon, mud
A,. ,s,cc ,,oen fn,ylnc aut1 srtHuv na un,ai in.
lss ~ ,,d;,r4 ~, H., cr,, ,r,a;., Tt,a ,,,<
tteaa " "'su''.' ~ Wv M ''s''S. ~ ii n'so
1 alleged That no naa neeh Aet1ne "a nero agent
pt tho Hantas. tt1 tha: they haro been carr, iIlg
| M babipcsa ~ uanai, md llaye ta[u tho % ucr
,.rt in cpbb to ,arso ru,pLer Of iii, crcdinrs.
's., y, :! s"as r,..,.. liz - IIA.''
1lo ce'n!'l.'ans i"''.'es aneEeA sn"I llama,
CsIrcts x 20. hFya B"eretod large amount OF
llt1r property to prevent ltH being tnkcn by tho
.,sonlo That Ito schcmo Of tho Instrument
.snr;,.d so ,.t NOV cou,1 ,,,,. i,r'.o ,,,,,,,
ny oe''~su ~ s'1 '"oS eou'o '''''"e ;. 'ttee auh'
u money one u tIe'r cIeuHp1a' hs 'hote aseosH
Ee1a moro tlan tier depsa; t.,at tho Assignee
kp failed TO give a:tr account OF Liz
1tslibke, and has fhlto 10 Keep the termH OF
he assignment. Eav,o therefore uahs that 6
Hc4yer mRr To appointed Tor the trm, aud
Ibst the Mtn.. r. ot tho iirin Rntj tho picsrnt
Assignee M. H. restrained from Interfering III
Inr way with ia afiailN.
ActorSr.
rrsllln Emery. anA QooIgo Y. stIaiahs iled
still aghsnHt Jscob Il. English ycb rrlav in tbs
Circuit Court nshlnE form dissolution VI part
ptrshlp and accuns. IhesHintt, tEa: III A:,11 las:
ltty ente!cd into Iortuarelip Will thc '1cf.udAnt
Eu the planihg.fnill a1id EchcrA! ,nnnnf'Ssnllns
biA1ae6 ~ p!3cc ~ lile AoE1ndlhL Collier o!
Iwens}-secopd and Iaaln streets. Ite "A!AtRl
xn to 10 S1U,Du0, Gta each party N.u to g..I.
ttbute ouc-t hid, aud 6lart in the profits mud
ixEs iD' a similar proyortiou, The partuersl,io
:, sstsied i1.o p ana sesilaqetl !o' s'fna linz
ssssct s @ Ius,uess ns IS acss Ecl;s M ha
IT, sssto Sxs Of basaess WITCH M fo to t NJ and dD lay
hereby oausod puola losses to tic firm tint Tho
sost uaa i; MI. III ii ~ Tnay S .ass.
~ .isd iii aat;rg that H., ,,ar,,arS}.;,,
u, H. sa b. dtsosed, % nasotssr s bs s npponte al
ucount Lad OF the profits hriHitE thnrcfrom aud
auinunct!on issued 10 prevent tl!n defendant IN
tatncahtina from Interfering with tho p1rtuor-
lhp Affairs.
.Tns aAdz-.An:lEtEE Butt.
IN Tho SUIT of David \. Gage asa.nst Franklin
Pslns!ea, for q dissolution OF past 1erahip III
Asomnlbus business Z motion waa naao oaioro
!ass Moore Yesterday f,rn rule to compel tho
Nn'ss in Chancery to hare them os.m,ued, in
order to arltyo at Eolter determination u tho
p't!s q shG bra'ness; The 1nfso fnaly or
sea that tile defondant ahnni4 rFoa.eo ,hc
ssta AAAAo Ats 49, 49, 0A't r. NASts sAo tA
teto;erl. or shoW caule @itn,p isn days for his
laIAh,
LIMITED LlAni1lTi.
Ths fol'cn'u order wan made yesterday by
asJpdyea Of tn Superior Count lu reference
otta blpk In w4sir1 rertxlu nDileyn received Ly
hs Clerk should 10 dtro,itsa:
Ra ordered ly tin Court nj, E.+ Judges c,ucurrna
a.ads eseat .. Aait or af!st De:. O. la75, III
s. deposited n curt 10 ae.lo tvets u ttt nhich
a. III * =! sna a taeff 70 ~ aMscss M r.
M1l Lr ~ cts, - ~ Cn,1t iii, IL I,,o e H.. ~ ~
aInpt, LIN md Trust t]a,n,any. IN IN tha CIV ~
Gskaea, wL:ch Cou,peuY il Lcisby Jcysnh;Sd
iAo leyoatto,y u thia Court, and TO
nat 70 deposited ehall bo deposited TN.
y NJ 'es e vine = "CerS " inrertnf Court af
y rner ~ huat Guy G 60 ~, sa%n w. ~: :"
Ta ceart cn n,i h,nk Mcsen, aMe5 ty ,Is r.,'i
WI u us,or auhyriztnn lid UI,rk 10 t,rsw saii
t:csqr cEtci, tbs copy u s.iA orier t, 10 sIgaed
y w 5"l4s Da1rs The order for thu payiacTt OF
Auaas,a to ~ ds-wn.
DiyoRons.
,A4lQ for DIVORCE waa tuod ycstarday in tho
t1osllor Court by Ba, tho1ou,ew Gormau, which
hh3H rnth thrr tfin+, ,toto of