New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-02-19
q Was it only upon hi. shoulder, A think that is ali
CRoss.ExAMyArIoN OF MR.. ROBINSON.
Mr.. Fullerton-That Is all.

CR0ss-EXAMINATIoN OF Mr.. ROBINSON.
Mr. EvartsMr Robinson how mary days you attended
witness this court A How many days have been
here
@ Yes Sir as q witness A I here yesterday after
day before yesterday morning. and about hour and
half the day before that.
O. Yes and last week and the week berorei have
been here before, Sir.
q. Obi
Mr. Fullerton-well, do You deny thst, Mr.. Rvarsi
Mr. Ryarts-Ohl no. Mr.. Robinson has been here good
many times
Mr. FuertonJust exactly many times he has stated
Mr. Evarts-I have doubt he stated 1t correctly.
Mr. Beach-Ycu seemed 10 express doubt.
The wness-I would have come all IL / could avoid
Mr. Evarts-No; suppose not Now Sir is Mr.. Moulton
or Mouton any connection or relative yoursi A Mrs
MOulton is
q. What connecticut A. She Is niece Of mine, Sir.
q Has your partnership with Mr. Mouon been lately dis
solvedi A 1t Is not dissolved YET s-the partnership
Of the firm. The warehouse business has been
withdrawn from the firm The leases terminated on the first OF
January and owning the property and Mr. Woodruff owning
others withdrew-the terminated and have with
drawn that part Of the business from the fsm.
Q. Dissolved, then as Of the hrst Of Janussyf
1r Beach-No Sir
Mr. Fulerton--Oh. no
Mr. Beach-He tells you 1t was not dissolved
Evarts-In respect that part Of the business Yes
Sir the warehouse business.
@ Now Sir in what business does any connection still
nne and of what durability Is any present connecticut A.
The merchandise business is still continued.
@ With term fixed for the termination OF that also! A.
Yes, Sir
O. When does that termnatei A The Ars Of March next
@ Wasn't il originally fixed to terminate the first Of
February: A. The first OF this last Februaryf
@. This present February. A. Originally hxcd'
O. Yes Sir originally when you dissolved to part wasn't
the connection that retained originally fixed TO
dissolve the first OF February A. Not originally
The first dissolution that was fixed upon was
fixed upon year ago last February. to take
place. could arrange business so that it could ermi-
nate then, the first Of May or June last.
@ OF last year, A. Yes, Sir.
Q Well am not talking sbou that That is all right A.
No bat the TO the original
O. Now you did have present termination Of some part Of
your connection the first Of January that you have
stated Now wssnt part Of that arrangement which er
minated part your business relations the first OF Janu-
ay whole OF your business relations were to ter mi
on the first Of Februarythe present February It
terminate on last February
O. This February There had been arrangement that
it should terminate then.
@ This present February Yes Sir but there had been
an arrangement January aui last August aud Sepem
her bat that was with reference arranging our business
@ And the arrangement is that it is to terminate
wholly the LIST Of march, A The 1st Of March unless there
is some reason for pOstponing it again
O. Yes Sir unless tits changcdi A. Yes Sir there is
definite understanding that il shall terminate then.
O. Now was it al Moultons request that the full ter
mnaton Of your connection was postponed from the st OF
February to tina Let Of March
Mr. Beach, don't the importance proprey OF dis
Judge Neilson-I think will take it,
The witnessThe question again. Mr. Eyarts IL you please
@ Was it at Mr. Moultons request that the full Transaction
OF your connection partners should be postponed from the
LIST OF February to the lst Of March A. Yes, Sir.
@ Was it his request that the full termination OF your
connection was not completed ls of JanIay but in
part il was postponed 1st OF February? A. Yes Sir
think Ii
Mr.. Eyarts-That is all, Sir.
Mr. Fuleson-Taai is all Mr.. Robinson. Mr.. William Bra
sher.