New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-04-22
TILE PAYMENT OF S., 900.

n Now. Sir. Won we're asked some questions
IN Che cros,exnminaton concerning this payment Of
a., 900 and this statement-ths passage In your state
mcnt-to wit, your answer: ..,.. Irl-...
O Under what circumstances did you come W pay tht
5000 IN SUN A. Because II was represeh.esth
me that whole difficulty could now be oy tna
sc.s o 10 fat they woad be able 90 right on
aud that with the going on Of them ta9 sss :"
the whole thing; It was to save Tlton pecIniarily
what whole thing--what difficulty. ana In what WAY
was the 5000 settcdi
MI FallcrtOn-rhat IL objected TO. '~
Mr. Eysrts--I have asked that question
Mr.. Fullerton-I have a right TO object to It,
Judge Nellson-I think he may answerit. l..l
Mr. Fullerton-Docs your Honor permit tliatf
Judge Neilson-Yes. .. ......
Tho + understood the normal avosation and
means Of connection between him md hs profession and
the public wa. mperatiyeIy needul TO The Goen age
and The Golden Age was tba-and whatever would heei
The Golden ige aoat and give fair voyage wona oe
direct help 10 Hint and would finish his di'hcuites-n's
nocuniary and other difficulties Of that nd-and It was
with reference to that that mad" a. supposed one
among others, the contribution OF the 5000.
Mr.. Eyart,-Thit is all, Sir. ....
Judge Ncils0n-Will the audience keep their seats
ITO the jurors Our adjournment viii be, gentlemen TO
an hour from this time.
Mr. EyartsIi your Honor please. ono NJ the Jnrymfh
desires question to be asked
Judge Neilson-fes.
Mr. Evarts-One OF the jTyIncn. Mr.. Halscd, suggests
this question: Whether in raising the $4,000 on mort
gage on your property Mrs Beechcr Joined in the mort
gagef A. She dld-that H. think recolect 1T; thnk
recoect some questions she ought never to have asked
me.
Mr. Eyarts-Whatever yOu do rccollect on the SUBJECT
the record OF course will show.
The Witncss-Ycs. Sir
O. You think she did, A. Yes, told her it was bust
ness operation.
Mr. Brach-Onc moment. understood you to say IN
the latter part your you told your wife IL was
business operation? A. said chatted about IT,
O. Didn't you say thatf A. Not in any strict
O. Didn't you lust say that-that you told her 1t was
business opcratoni
Mr. Evarts-Wc will read the record
Mr. beach, ask him whether he didn't say that
The witncss-Yes, Sir said it substantially.
Judge Nelson ITO the stenogropherl- those qucs
tons and answers.
The Tribune photographer read the following questions
and answers:
O. one of the urymen t1r Halsted suggests this ques
ton whether In raising the ?Ooo on morlease On 'o our
property Mrs Bcccbcr joined III the mortgagef A. nne
did that Is, think | recOllect it; think recollect
some she ought never 70 nave the
OF course will showi A. Yes, SIR 49,.
q. You think she did A. ICES, told her 1t was
business operation.
The Wtncss-I should like to state still further that
this was ocosc conversation between my wife and me-
She said she didn't understand what 1t was for and
said, "wcll, women don't understand about business
operations; this business operation " or something
like that but it was simply
Mr.. Bcach-what II was That is all
The Wtness-It little social j0co5e remark be-
tween my wife and me.
Mr.. Eyarts-That is all.
Mr. Mal,on-Thc Court will now take recess until
2l2 O'Clock