The Pulaski citizen. [volume] (Pulaski, Tenn.) 1866-current, 1875-03-25
CHANCERY COuRT.

DEGREES have been entered in the follow
ing causes since our last report;
as c Smith We J os Smith; RhodA A Borup
ct al VI W G. Borup ct al; S c Moffett and
wife vs. d Rose ct al: Jno { Lester, admir-,
VS. Samuel White; J 7 hcKissaek et al vs.
Jno " Clsck ct al; Roberts vs. 7 G Jones
ct al; T G Jones ct al vs. j Roberts, OF al ;
Samuel Orr Va Mary I Brandon ct 81; b &
EPPerson ct al VS. VIM SimontOn OF al; Jesse
Grubbs Va Benz F Martin ct al; G W Nc
Grow and wife vs. Mary NJ Mason ell al; "
II Alternately VS. Jesse Shelton; Benjamin
franklin vs. James McNeace ct al; Rebecca q
Samuel ct al VS. NJ A Samuel OF al; David
Angus ct al vs. Gus Angus ct al; A I Dob
lins ct al vs. S b Hammonds,et,al Cary Gill
bort ct al VS. Jackson Caldwell ct al; d
Wright, admir-, Va + . Bennett ct al; j g
Walker VS. S G Calvert ct al; b Walker ct
al VI G Calvert OF al; g Calvert, ext,
We w ID Smith ct al; jackson Cox OF al vs r
B Cox ct al; Sallie Maddox ct al vs. WIN Jor
dan ct al; Jos and A Young, ex'rs, Va A r
Moore ct al; G n Ordwgy ct al Va Anna B
Bramlette ct al; Edmundson, comm'r, Va
Samuel Angus ct al; G WestmOrelnnd Va
7 Stevenson ct al; A B Hall ct al Va / j
Ingram ct al; Martha Willeford ct al ~ Jo-
sephine d Willeford ct al Jno NJ Simonton,
err, OF a. VS. T Potter ct al Jno M Simon-
ton vs Potter ct al; T Dunlap ct al vs.
S p Smith; A B Beech admir- Laura and
John Lester; Louisa Hill VS. VIM Hill; T ?
Hall VS. J A Samuel ct al; JnO W West ct nj
VS. S G Motfett ct al; p @ s Perkins ct al Va
T ClAck; w E Thompson va Jno L Beavers
ct al; w " RlKer VS. Jas Carter ct al; j
Walker vs. + Cox, ct al; g w ", Meerew and
wife VS. NJ NJ Mason ct al; J @ Walker OF al VS.
Ed Z Cox ct al; j as T McKissAok OF al VS. Jno
W CiAck ct al: ID G. Anderson ct al eX paFte;
Mary Ballentine VS. B NJ Young ct al; J j
and VIM Haynie A Martin ct al; I n
Nobhtt VS. 4 T Dobbins, admir-, ct al; A 7
Dobbins VS. VIM Malone ct a. Addie Marks
VS. A c Marks; Q N Ordway and wife We Auna
B BrRmlette ct al; X NJ HaTwell VS. = 3 SUIT
ton; W z Smith. admir-, VS. same; ESell
ct al VS. same; Stacy ct al vs. William I
Smith; NJ Walker vs. W W Smith ct al;
Thos W Wilkes OF al vs. Samuel Wilkes; Mary
/ New vs. b " Mason'S executor; David
Fleeman ct al vs. F L Fleeman ct al; Angus
We Jno X Wagstaff; 5 B diamonds vs. M +
Baulch; T q TayloT OF al vs. Thos Holly OF
al; J Il Ezell ct al Vs. W J Ezell OF all W y
Lewis, admir-, ct al VS. Lucy q DAILY ct ali J"
II Oliver ct al vs. Alfred Houze ct all J Z An
thony vs. w NJ Beasley ct al; Cook, Settle y
| Co. VS. L McAilhon ct al; VIM Malone ct -
VS. ParmenaH Cox ct al; + Q Maury, admir-, Va
p q Perkins ct al; John n Simonton, ext
vs. J Z Potter; FuTman 4 &c. W Il MoMll-
| lion ct al; Thos T Burgess OF al vs. L Nc
/ Million ct al; X i Evans, ex'r, VS. Cecy Wis
| ford ct al; S w Sweeney vs. b Boswell; A
| ID Smith ct al 7 p Smith ct al: + 2 Holmes
! vs. w w Gordon ct al; Benjamin Franklin
| vs. Jas McNeece; Andrew Dobbs VS. Wn
/ Evans, admir-; VIM IL Walker vs. Jas Carte
OF al; Ira Hatch ct al Is b Cox ct ali A
| spotford, eK'r, vs. II Witt ct all & w wood
| ring ct al vs. J ID Sc ales ct al; b 2 Higgins g
al VS. VIM Young ct al; F Amis ct al VI
I Martha A mis- ct al; Elizabeth Buford, ext
ct al vs. A Cox OF al; John 7 Steele, trustee
| VS. same; NJ NJ Gloon vs. I Fisher ct 81
Louisa Hill vs. w Hill; Robert Rodes anS
wife vs. Il + Carter ct al; samuel Sheriff.
admir-. Va las NJ Jones; 7 NJ Jones
Beasley Cobb.
Final DEGREES have been entered in the fol
/ lowing causes:
n Smithson vs. W McGrew ct al; Johl
Philhpsvs George Maxwell ct all Edmund
son, comm'r, VS. v Aymett ct al; ( Ed
4 mund.on commit vs. ID q Ussory ct al.