The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1875-04-15

others, asking for the location Of .
county road, ia pursuance Of law, COM
mcncing on the halt section line Of
section sixteen, at the corner where
said half section line crosses the Sec
ton line between section twenty-one
and sixteen, III township twenty-scyen,
range one, east, thence north OH said
half section line until its intersection
with the section line between section
nine and sixteen, township twenty
seven, range one, cast. Bond filed and
approved, April 5th, 1875. Due notice
having been given both by publication
and posting, and the proof thereof
having been filed in the county clerks
Office April 5th, 1875, it was ordered
that p. II. Massey, D. F. Williams and
w. A. Richey be appointed viewers,
and the Richey House be designated a
the place of meeting on the 18th day
of April, A. D. 1875, from thence to
proceed to view aud lay out said road.
A petition signed by James Lacky
and twenty-eight others asking for the
establishment of county road COM
mecing'a; the state road between Sec
tions eleven and fourteen. town twen-
ty-eight, range one, west, thence run
ming west on section line to Clear
Greek said road to be known as Clear
Creek road. Bond having been filed
April 5tli, 1875, and due notice having
been given both by publication and
posting in pursuance of law, and such
proof having been flied in the Office Of
the county clerk, on the 9TH day o!
April, A. ID. 1875.
On motion J. d. York, n. Minter and
w. +. Hobson were appointed viewers
and the house of j. B. York designated
as the place of meeting of said viewers
on the 18th day of April, A. ID. 1875.
from thence to proceed to view and
lay out said road as the law directs.
Petition of W. a. Shuman, and TWEEN
ty-eisht others asking for the estab-
lishment of county road, was laid
over, lacking proof of publication.
Road petition of r. p. Wright, ct al,
was rejected, not having sufficient num-
Der Of signers.
Petition of John Davis and sixteen
others asking for the removal of the
present trustee of Waco township was
presented. Petition was rejected,
county commissioners not having pow
err to act in the premises.
Petition for abatement of VIM. Shell
@as granted on personal property tax
in Wichita city, for the reason that the
constitutional exception of $500. was
not allowed him by the assessor.
The following report was presented,
viz:
Wichita, Kansas, April 3, 1875.
To the Hon. Board Of County Com
missioners Of Sedgwick County,
Kansas:
We, the undersigned, beg leave to
'eport that on Saturday, the Sd day OF
April, 1875, and during the session OF
he district court of said county of |
we made an examination of
he county jail Of said county and find |
he same in good condition, and suffi- |
ient for the safe keeping of the pris-
'ncrs, and their accommodation and |
lcalth. w. L. CAMPBELL,
Judge 18th judicial dist. Kansas.
W. Z. STANLEY,
County attorney, Sedgwick county.
l, John Tucker. county clerk, and |
Jerk of the board Of county commits
ioners of Sedgwick county, Kansas,
10 hereby certify that the above and |
is true and correct copy of |
he proceedings of the board at their
ession held or the 5th day of April,
\. d. 1875.
In testimony whereof, l have here |
unto set my hand and affixed the |
SEAL seal of Sedgwick county, the |
date above written,
JOHN TUCKER,
County Clerk.