davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1875-04-22

w ICHITA.
N EW DRUG STORES
cHAs- W. HILL,
DRUGGIST AND PnAsnAcEur'sT
1st door North LIST National Bank,
WICHITA, KANSAS.
71s Lsrsess ssd Bsa &setv
Pure Drugs and Medicines
IN THE SOUTHWEST.
Toilet Articles Psrfdmsry. Patsnt Medicines, Hs.
Agent for the
AYERIL CHEMICAL PAISZ
n PAysieisss Prescriptions carefully ee~psssSsS.
A.. as:s ss 70. s:ss e: p: 30 1''s
MISSOURI VALLEY
Life Insurance Company
LEAvENwoRTH, KAs.
Cash Income, 1872, 'sia2a =
Paid Policy-Holdsn in 1872, So,2S7 4
Inserest Receipts for 1872, $4,000 "a esre's .
Lossss BY DeseA.
Examine our plans and rates before insa-'w
| elsew where. The most popular and alvan ~
forms. and favorable terms for insurance prs
| sented.
All policies -forfeitabie afser the secob
annual payment Dividends are declared annu
ally affer the FIRST payment, available immediate
! ~ - cash in payment Of premium.
| Contracts direct with the company will be mad
in all parts Of the country with cfkcsept and re
liable men who propose TO canvass personally 10
live insurance.
Executive Commitfes.
s. Z. HOFFMAN, u. L. NEWMAN,
T. A. HURD.
Finance Comminee:
r. q. ALLEN, J. r. RICHARDS,
j. l.. HUNTING.
President. Vice President
i IL JONES. II. L. NEwNAx.
Acting Secretary. Treasurer
". Z HARVEY, 81. Louis, +. A. HUEr
i-tv faonsuisiua Acspssv A,sr' a.. =
| YYAD DyC o. m
The Wichita city eagle. [volume] (Wichita, Kan.) 1872-1883, 1875-04-22

be removed in & few years. AlPthat is
necessary is to keep down the prairie
fires, the putting il, OF the seesl or cut
thugs, and with ordinary cultivation
all kiuds OF trees grow with such
astonishing ramdity MS TO test the Gre
duiify Of eastern men. No doubt,
dense forests would have generations
since covered these rich rolling prai-
ries, but for the destructive Of 1res
that annually swept over then. But
It IL much cheaper, better and quicker
to build up homes and mako farms
here than 1t was for our forefathers
east and north, who were compelled to
first remove heavy forests from the
grounds. For fencing the Usage Orange
Is hedge will in time be the univer-
sal fence. Cheap, sure and efficient as
. fence, q wind break for stock and >
relief to the eye, most Of our farmers
are already growing such fences, not
withstanding the "herd law which
compels every man to take care Of his
own stock.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
SEVERE STRUCTURES on Mr.. wMKEsON.

O. Upon reflection, can you recall whether you
had signed paper and without your money after It
was signed: A. No, SIR such incident occurred That was
Mr. Wk -ons statement and It was idseAood put Deiore
the Invest eating Committee; Mr. Wlkeson published state
ment 70 the effect thar declined sign the trpare covenant,
because Mr Bowen had paid that lie; Mr. Bowen
paid the spot The spur within half an hour from The a.
bitration.
O. Now your recollection distinct s it, that you had the
check before you signed the paper: 4 VI recollection TINS
Sir that the check was paid that very night Of tho
arbitration and the paper signed days afer"aFds-
first one signature, then another and then another
Q It your own signature tha, speak OF A. My mpres-
sion Is that my signature three days afterwards;
that bad had discussion with Mr Wlkeson about the
paragraph that was 10 sign
O. Are you that yOu received the check before you
signed the papery A. Yes, Sir because the paper was NOT
signed unit. afterwards
q Now you say you cannot remember when where you
signed that paper A remember the spot; re-
member there discussion which followed IT, Of two or
three DAYS
Q Nor the cxac, time? A. No Sir only remember this
very distinctly that -sun, Of the paper had nothing to do
with the arbitration. or the payment Of the money
Mr Eyars-That did ask you aud will ak to have
struck out Mr Stenoyrapher, that will be struck out
Mr. Eyar.s 10 Mr Morris-Now, Gentlemen, have you the
pages Of the Tue story" as it is called'
Mr Morris-No, Sir; have got them.
Mr. Eyar-I ask now If your Honor please from the conn
"True Story" gave them notice.
Judge Nelson-They viii undoubtedly give them up hey
have them.
Mr. Eyars- gave them notice 20 produce them yesterday
that would need them this morning.
Mr. Beach-They ought have been produced. What is the
reason they have not, Mr. Morris?
Mr. Morris-I have not got them in my possession.
The Wness-I didn't understand that was requested 70
bring them.
Mr. Eyarts-No matter
Mr. Beach-Oh, yes; il is matter.
Mr. Eyar,s-I asking him any question: was asking
the papers from counsel
The Witness-I viii bring them 70 YOU at , o'clock
Mr. Morris-CTo Mr. Eyarts.I l didn't have them, Mr.
Eyarts
Judge Neson-Mr Evarts perhaps you proceed to some
other topic they viii bring them at o'clock
Mr. Beach-Yes will bring them 70 you at two o'clock,
after Mr. Ton goes home from the witness stand he didn't
understand that bring them he thought that the re-
quest was addressed counsel diln think Of tending 10
it, as supposed NJ Morris had all the papers
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
THE READERS OF THE BOWEN LETTER.

Mr. Evar,s-We will pass, then, if your Honor
nease 70 another subject ITO the wtnes Now Mr. Tilton
Won prepared for publication pu type Mr. Bowens letter.
with commens--lo you remember y Yes Sir
O. Now Sir date Of that been dxedthe date OF THIS
publications Turning Mr. sheanan Has that been hzee
Mr. Shearnanl
The Wltness-rhc end of March 1872.
Mr. Eyarts-Yes; think Won did dx il.
The Witness-I mentioned il you yesterday.
O. Yes now when you put that in type or shape As 10
ia here as an exhibit, 70 whom did you show h'
A don't know that showed anybody after it In
type discussed with Oliver johnson before it was in type
O. That we have; put in this slip fomi A. Yes,
Sir,
@ Ny question is 70 whom did you show III
Mr.. Beach-After thati
Mr. Eyar,s-Ycs after It in tina, shape.
The W..ness-I don't recall this time any one to whom
sboved H. Mr. Mouton lad il and showed 10 Mr. Beeeher
think
o OH that ls what he dd; ask Whist you did A. Ny
nrsson Is that Mr. Beecher present and tAat Mr. MoDi
ton showed it to him, and that was present
O And in your presence' A. Think go
Now 10 whom else did you show it A. Outside Of ny
counsel I don't remember anybody, at present.
O You think you lid show 70 your counsel A. think
showed TO Mr. Ward don't know whether showed i
TO Judge Reynolds or not
O. Are you confident your recollection Mr. Tton, that
youdd show this that time anyone but Mr. Monlton
and Mr. Beecher and your counsel, A. think at that tine
nobody saw IT, after thar time number Of people saw IT,
O. speak now Of that time. A. don't
remember that any it, except through hr Moui'
ton Mr ClahIn IT, and Mr. Bowen, ba, not through me-
O. speak Of what you did A. sul may be wrong about
it l don't remember.
O. And how after this DO you think you did begin TO
shot 10 other pesoasg Ny Impression that nobody saw
unit, after the Woodruff publication in November and was
Joining with Mr. Mouon in making devices part OF the
Mr. Eyagts-No matter ask that that be struck out IL
the date that asking for Was not in December is'2'
A. Yes Sir
O. Do yOu remember whether you showed to Mr. Wikeson
before the uparie agreement covenant was gnedf a.
Why was part OF the rparte agreement-the article
O. Before t made part Of ~ WAY, of course
q Before had been agreed apon' A. II was part OF tas
trpartlte coycnaut-pasted fast - u.
Nj Eyarls-L understand tEas
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
TIE COVENANT AND IT'S MEANING.

The tripartite covenant may be important
weapon in the hands of the defense The direction In
which Mr. Beecher's counseOrs expect 10 WELD 1t
was more than family fOreshadowed during the two
hours that it was the object of Mr. Evartss ques-
hons to the plaintiff yesterday AS Mr.. MOulton
has sworn. the tripartite covenant completed
by the afixing of the signatures April 2, 1871,
while the arbitratOrs In the case of MIR. T1ltOn
aainst' Mr. Bowen made their award earlier on tie
same day. The defense may try TO show that the
two transactions hinged upon each other; to
that end Mr.. Evartss inquiries yesterday tended
His questions. put seemingly with little thought as
10 their consecutive order. in regard both TO
Ihe tripartite covenant and to the Bowen ar
sitration and so skillfuy did the examiner dove
tail" his queries about the two subjects that they
seemed to become inseparable events. The meeting
at Mr. MoultOns house IN regard TO the covenant
first described by the witness. who said that he
then and there, expressed his willingness to sign
the agreement twenty times over if MI Bowen
would sign. but when he more fully cOmprehended
the clause touching himself he declined to put his
name 70 IT, and that brought about the change. The
next questions were to whether Mr.. Hilton re-
celved the check for $1,000 from Mr.. Bowen be-
fore o- a-ter he signed the paper. The
witness sald Il was before. There was
very minute examination of the manner IN which
ness gave as the best his belief, that MI Bowen
signed II first: himself second Mr.. Beecher last.
The wel-known Bowen letter. winch formed part
of the tripartite agreement. and published IN
Brooklyn Sunday newspaper some time afterward'
was closely traced from tue day which it was
printed on slips IL Tie 6Olden dge Office. Mr..
Tilton SAID that he knew nothing of the manner IN
winch the SUNDAY newspaper obtained copy Of the
letter. although he had thought, because Mr Kim
sella had SAID that Mr. Beecher had shown him
tine tl1partite covenant that II through Mr..
Kusela that the letter had found its way into
print.
blr Evarts now called for the portion Of the So
called True story IN the possession of the prosecu-
ton but 1t was found that Mr. TiltOn had 1t at home
H promised TO produce it after recess. and MT.
Evars proceeded to other subjects to fill the remain
ing few minutes Of the morning session. The ques-
honiug then brought replies that from 1866 to 1870
inclusive the witness attended Plymouth Church
eight or Ten times year that he never except
once remained at Mrs. WoOdhulrs house until mid
might and also that he had to the papers
in Mr. Moulton's hands after the appearance of the
Bacon letter.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
THE PROOEEDINGsLYERBATIM
Mr. TMToN CANNOT INDICATE THE CHANGES IN
THE COVENANT.

Mr.. THT0N CANNOT INDICATE THE CHANGES IN
THE COVENANT.
The Court met at II a. m. pursuant to adjourn
ment Theodore TOn recalled and his crossexaminaton
resumed.
Mr. Evarts-we were speaking Mr. Ton Of The transaction
Of the arte agreement and Of the previous draft differing
from the actual paper, you rememberi A. Yes Sir.
You have copy Of that draft you have stated be-
heye A. Not unless the printed book is copy.
@ Yes unless the printed book is copy Now ask you
70 ookhat purpors to be copyn this printed book and
you recognize that the draft that replaced by the
actual paper Handing witness the book A. cannot say
whether this the original draft not purpos TO be-
q Look at it and peruse it. you please and whether
that now seems to you be the draft A All is SIR
that pupors 10 be cannot that It not nor that is
@ Well have you recollection concerning the draft the
paper which altered and altered by your request or
altered consequence Of suggestion Of youscant
from any recollection placing you back in the transaction
whether that is faithful copy far substance and
Of the thing concerned? A. recoect very dis
tncy Sir that there draft presented TO me which, when
carefully read it over declined sign and that made
alterations amendments in that draft perhaps rewrote
part Of it, and that the paper that signed not the first
without the alterations but the second one in which my tea
tons had been made
O. That understand A. Now whether this is copy Of
that first draft originally from Mr. Wkesons hand
have other knowledge than the fact that this book
says
@ Well won't you read the article that relates to yourself
aoud read it, and whether that article is in your
recOeconto the best Of your belief the article relating to
yourself in the draft A coud Mr. Evarts that
this the identical phraseooy which Mr. Wikeson first
submitted 10
@ On perusng that article to which have last called your
attention does anything to memory having been
in that article the dra-that is not there nowthat s not
in the print before you A. No especial phraseoogy or
sentence
In reading what now before Won in that article
your memory that there anything omitted in the
print before you that in that article in the draft A No.
Sir
@ Then far yOu know and believe that article as in
print before you in substance and meaning it in the
draft A. Well, could say that, Mr.. Eyars
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12

Wa. this paper executed in pcate' A No. Sir; there
was only copy. ,.u
O. only one copy A. Yes Sir that was the undersandhg
that understanding was kept however for Mr. wEeson
retained CODY and Afterwards published 1t without author
Mr. Eyarts-I ask TO have all that stricken OUT
Judge Neilson-Strike It out, undoubtedly
Mr. Evarts-I asked you il Il was IN tnphcae' ana you "a"
o-o ,s onIv one copy, A. No Sir; did not say that
.ad the soen agreement was there should be only one
CODY but that broken.
That not my question: asked whether Il was eIecu'ed
in plIcae or IL there only copy executed' A. say
that our that there should be only one copy
but there were copies Mr. Wkeson made one ana 1e
NJ THAT q, not NV question ask II It executed
in triplicae' A. Only one paper was signed
Mr. Evarts-That all my question ask that all 'he o'ne'
part be stricken out
Judge Neson-Certany; the rest can be inquired OF ae'
wRds
Mr. Eyarts-Undoubtedly ifimportant
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
THE TRUE STORY" IN COTJRT.
MISSING PARTS OF THE LONG HIDDEN
PAPER PRODUCED.

rtF TRIpARTITE COVENANT IN THF.NoRNING sKs-
s1oS-rrs CONNECTION WITH T.HR BOWEN ARBI-
TRAr1oN ExAMISED-TTE INTEREST OF THE Az
rERNooN sEssIoN-PART or rHE TRUE STORY
PRODUCED BY MR.. ruE0N-THE REMAINDER.
WHICH HAD BEEN THOUGHT DESTROYED,
BROUGHT N BY TfrK DEFENsE-THE CROSS
EXAMINATION OF Mr.. Triton ALMOST COM
PLETKD.
Only two subjects of importance were investi-
gated by Nr. Evarts yesterday, in his cross-exam-
nation of Mr, Hlton and these were the tripartite
covenant and Mr.. TltOns sO-called True Story"
The production Of a copy of the True Story " was
. surprise to Mr.. Ttons counsel but the facts
pontained in if have in various ways been IN print
before. Mr.. Evarts expected TO finish the cross
questioning yesterday but he was unable to do so
lie will probably conclude to-day.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
MR.. BowEy's CHECK RECEIVED BEFORE THE SIGN
ING

@. And can you not tell US at all whether it was
left in your hands after You signed IT, or whether It was et in
some one ees hands after your signing tl A. Wen, Sir my
memory ndsnct answer thar; my impression Is that
the paper fingered for several days before all the signatures wes
cot whether Charles sorrs got them or Mr. Mouon got them
do not know.
a. Now Sir do You remember whether or no you had re-
ceyed the check Of Mr. Bowen before signed this papef
received the check Of M Bowen the night OF the arn
tration don't think paper signed until few days
after that.
q Are Won certain Of that? A. think am positive Of that,
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
HOW THE SIGNED PAPER WAS EXECUTED.


Q. Now, when you presented this paragraph for
Insertion the copy ready for signature prepared in your
presencei A. That | do not remember.
O. BY Mr. Wilkeson' A. don't remember that
@ You do not remember ti A. No, Sir.
@ You do remember whether you signed at that inter
Yewi A. don't remember; no. Sir.
Do you remember that you signed It the ar Of the par
tiesP A. don't remember that.
o. Do you remember whether the parties together when
was signed and signed in the presence Of each other' A.
remember that they not; they never were together
@ Never were togetherf A. No, Sir.
o. And what signatures when you sgnedt II there
were any you do not knowi A. don't remember my impress
sion is thar Mr.. Beecher signed it first
O. That il was on when you signed' That my impress
sion; will not be certain,
O. And that Mr. Bowen's not on when you gnedl A.
don't remember Mr. Eyars second thought my impression
that Mr. Bowen signed arst that signed next and wrote
nv name over mis-; aud that Mr. Beechor signed last and
wrote his name mine; fulfilling the Scripture that the
first shall be last and the last arst" that my recollection
will not be positive.
O. That differs from your recollection moment aso' Yes
Sir; II comes " my mind,
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
THE WAY THE AWARD WAS MADE.

O. Now have you a copy Of the award that was
by these arbators A. Yes it consisted Of Bowens check
for 5000 believe have it that Is the only copy.
O You got the check A do not know whether have or
not got the money.
q Well would ike to see t.
Judge Neison-You would naturally have the check A
lido whether have it not; Mr Bowen has it
Judge NeilsonGt would 20 back to Bowen Of course A.
Yes
Mr. Eyart,-Bnt do not know whether IT, Of
he would keep the check a security for money
Judge Neison-He wond not delay drawing the money
Mr. Eyars-It has been already proved that the money has
been drawn and deposited it is the paper Itself that would
like to get.
Mr. Morris-Wel we haven't rot it, Of course
The Witness-What paper do you refer to-
O Mr Bowens check. A. Well, no Sir; had Mr Bowen's
money that what You asked me If had copy Of the
award told you that the only award was Mr. Bowen check
there was no paper That all cared forcaed for to
get
O. Now was Mr. Monitor with you when you received that
check A. Ny impression is that all the arbltaors were
there.
O. Mr. MOulton not arbitrator a. No, Sir He was
there too; it was held in his dining room.
O. Well am asking for the fact Mr. Moulton there
A. Yes Sir; he there
And did YOU then and there hand him the check
40 Sir; and there handed over 20 the check.
O. No; but Mr.. Mouton, am talking aboutg A. Oh l
don't remember that--my impression is kept il.
q Well do you remember Mr. Moulton was there A. Yes
O Now my question il, did you then and there hand the
check % him ? \. Mr. Mou.tOn?
Q Yes. A. think not think took the check home
showed it to my wife
O. Have you clear recollection Of that A No, Sir not
very clear think gave the check day to Franklin
Woodruff for deposit.
O. Asa deposit? A. Yes Sir: that is my recollection.
O. Next day after you received itp A. think so; perhaps
two days after.
@ And not to Mouton personality A. think not Sir.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12

but Mr.. Evarts said that he could not. He had
hoped to finish yesterday, and would certainly do SO
this morning.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12

RECORDS OF THE CHANGES IN THE COVENANT.
O. Now, where have you any draft or record of
any changes you made in this original draft A Have L
any draft Of them?
@ Have you any draft yes Any draft or recod' A. No
Sir; but Wikeson has
O. OF the changes A. He has the paragraph which pro
posed my writing displaced his paragraph and
substituted my own ne has that
O. He did at that time A. Yes; and he copied from
that-made the clean copy in his own handwriting
O. It was left in his possesson-that draft A. Yes be-
lieye It
@ Your draft you remember then the article relating to
this in the trpartte agreement in your anguagei A.
do not know whether Is entirely in my own language think
is in my own handwriting My recollection is df you will
hand me the book that adopted part Of Wikesons para
graph.
O. That course may Imean to say that the paragraph
as it appears you presented 1t in shape do not
think composed entire paragraph Think took part OF
his composition and changed tbut my recollection is that the
whole paragraph which proposed TO sign he handed over TO me
in my handwriting and that he then made the clean copy Of
the with my section copied from my handwriting in
IT, and that then signed il.
O. Then reads IS you presented 1t Tor insertion
A. Yes, Sir.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
THE CUSTODIAN OF THE COVENANT

THE CUSTODIAN OF THE COVENANT.
O. Who kept that single copy? A. Mr.. Horace
B. C1afin
@ Was delivered to him your prescnce' A. DO not fe
member.
O. In whose hands did you leave II when you signed W A.
Nv best recollection wasperhaps Charles stos posoT
Frank Moulton's; still
O. Charles stos was one Of the arbatorsi A. Yes, Sir;
will not be positive about that.
O But ne was one Of the arbratorsl A. Oh yes Sir.
O. Now who were present when you signed tl A. do ncs
remember that.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12
No MEMORY OF WHERE THE SIGNING WAS DONE.

NO MEMORY OF WhEifb IhE olUNiNu va" D"f''''
O. Well, somebody was; you remember some one'
A. don't remember that anybody don't remember now
don't remember where sgnedit
O. Well was Mr. Wilkeson present. A. That do not 70
member.
O. Was Mr. C1ahin present. A. do not remember that
O. Was Mr. sorrsg A. I don't remember that.
O Was Mr. Freelands A. 1 don't remember; remember
that he not.
O. You remember that Mr. Freeland was not' A. Yes Sir
because he had nothing to do with the business
O. about your You remember that De was
notf A. Yes, Sir.
O. Was Mr. Bowen present? A. No, Sir.
O. Was Mr. Moulton present. A. Possibly he may have
been; | am not sure
O. But this scene s not before you' A. No, Sir
O So YOU can reproduce all in the persons that wers
there? A. No Sir remember the place or the time
that put my name on paper and that the reason Of my
ind s.nctness 80
Q You have nothing before Eou now-no picture IN which
Won can present il at ay A. No SIR it does not come up 70
my mind.
New-York tribune., 1875-02-12

WRAVGLEs OVER THE LEGALITY OF QUESTIONS
Mr. Eyarts--Will your Honor be so good as to
note nv exception ITO the witnessl Do you mean 70 say
NJ Triton that when you heard or knew Of only the part hA
.ectei Mr. Bowen's signature, you were ready to ssn'
Mr. Fulerton-One mOment-I object " that
Mr. Evarts-That IS my question.
Mr. Fullerton-I know your question that tue reason
TO II he has already stated the fact that wheh mat
argranh was read he expressed willingness TO h anu nc
b.s reneed il over three times and now the qnesoh Pu
~, the fourth object upon the ground that the question
ai.tjncty emphaticay and repeatedly answered already
Mr. Eyarts-No such question has been asked Whatever
Ia. ben said has said by the witness Voluntarily aa
now ask this question.
Judpe Ne!sou-I think he may answer
w F.llerton-It Is only consumption Of time for nothing
last question repeated by the TRIBUNE sIenosapleFI
The Witncss-Ies. sir.
Mr. Fuerton-Now, after having said It. he asks ni NC
means 70 sayt that is the import Of the question
Mr. Eyarts-Exacy He has voluntarily made statement
not in answer 10 any question Of mine
NJ Fullerton-NOW You ask him II he means 70 stA'c -
Mr. Eyarts-I do, and have got his answer
Irdcc Seilson-We will allow that
NJ Fyarts-That you 20 sayi A. what thAt .
% Youdo; You have answered, haven't yol' a "e-
dort understand now what your last question vas
", Fyarts-Won't you read tie question agaln'
fQuest!on again read .
Nv recollection is Sir that burst In with an eIFavasint
e,nresson that II Bowen will say that and sign AA anu o'o'
hat ont will agree again to circulate It; VIII sign
sntv times oyer something like that that my Deal Fee
election
Illinois Staats-zeitung., 1875-07-27
Gime GteGeret tn SeortG.
8eoria, ST., %. Suli.

Sames &immel uub Sat. OonneuD
batten fi1 Dor einigen Sa9en perfeinott.
Bat lit Der 8sii5er elmer S6napSfletpe,
&immeI nerfoIgt ben loblt6en Seruf. etz
mes Sii6er5. @eftern Nbellb tam stint
mel tn Die S6uapsbuoe Bat'S, nm 1t0
einell elmer Q8aiier 81 bolen, tbatld@i
LID G5er, tpie man aus Dem Serlaut Der
0tnse i@liebeu muB, I'M 0elegen9ett 81
erbalten, nit leinem Teince an5ubtn6eH.
Bie ct erpartet Bate, permetgerte ibnt
B0t bas 8ai1er unb inoem oieler lt1
abtpanote, ftteB Ct ibm Elm Welier in ben
&Iden, bi1t unter Dem N0ielbetn. 9ta0
poQbra6ter Sbat lief er na6 Dem SluB,
1prarg TT fem Boot un6 ruoerte eiliglt
Oapon. 9at's @anbe lit allen Ani9eIne
nah IebeusgefGbrlt6.
Illinois Staats-zeitung., 1875-07-27
8erMn8IIGt+
elizabeth. sc. g., 2.
YltlabeIpbtN, 20. $.

VT W. ~ OF ~"
Sine Srau S6reiner BON getp NIban1y
SUB, tpuroe, ais lie bette 8ormittag init
tbrer Otutter ,no elmer Tran Nseier na9
benz 8abnDof fubr, I'm mad 9auie suz
%ridsufebren, bur6 bas Dur6brennen
ibres Bferoes bon tbrem Wagen 9erobz
geI9leuOert nno eet0otet. Ste betoen
anoeren Srauen fino 10 i@per bertpun7
bet, baB ibr Auftpmmeu nAtpabrl@ein>
LID lit.