New-York tribune., 1875-01-30
JUDGE NELSON NprsrRToUs.

Judge Neilson-I wish TO ask the counsel, most
Of whom hsve from New York whether they
not willing to work think tomorrow is Sat
urday
Mr.. FaDerton-nis In New-York; I don't know how it is
here rLaughterl
Mr. EvSrts- have hesitation in saying should not
hke 70 surrender my Saturdays 70 this
judge Nelsou-ThenI make this inquiry, whether 1t
viii b. agreeable the counsel should meet next week
not a. H. bu 1870 morning and adjourn not a. T. but
$50 which viii give ns AZ hour each day and than
additional day the Of the week wish to know II
counsel consent 10 that do not wish
70 b. unreasonable bat put to you.
Mr RyaIts your Honor please proper that we should
and know my iearned friends vii hat case Of 30
much magnitude and importance and Of 50 vide range Of
consideration pressing upon counsel IN respect OF evidence
and the production OF IT, has ny Judgment never been
brought t in the experience Of profession 80 soon
after issue this; that has thrown upon counsel
doubt both de probably less upon the plaintiff side
than upon because they masters Of the situation
aud could choose when bring It more than we-has
placed very great necessary labor upon and we have
only The fragments Of tAe daY TO in that way.
We think that time in Coa, BY having those
portions Of the day out Of Court than II attendance
here
M Beach-I agree entirely with the views Of my learned
friend.
J8o Nelson-I wish to ask M Byarts IN relation TO the
question before before adjourn Suppose husband
indicted on trial Tor assault upon his wife
ren intent XII, for the crime Of bigamy can
husband, or not, nnder the Act Of 1863, present
himself witness and De heard as witness irrespective OF
any Limitation affecting the marriage relation irrespective OF
the question bow shall sn.te the wife or how affect her!
And does that Illustrate any any tendency the part
Legislature make free nroad upon that which had
long time before been the settled rule Of iawf
M EvGrs-The Of the should wisely be be-
Us your Honor please But under stand thai that Is
statute in w whole purpose directed to placing defendants in
Ffn rha
and copcabc anl tha, s declared by the Act se 70
subject AZ possible atous that would app 70 other
witnesses
Judge Nelson-And no more
Mr. Eyar.s-No more DO al witnesses, but to
any knd Of witnesses.
JUDGE Nei-ou-A-l competent Witnesses
Mr Eya-is-AI stood ID the predicament
towards The lat thy did b.. whether tla Wo4--
cd much on ta- point do not see.
Mr Fullerton NJ your Honor when the decision Of
uHs point winch a. Just a--lcL S- De announced!
JUDGE Neisou-At meeting on Monday morning.
handed up p-nd copy Of points 20 the
Court handing copy 70 the counsel for the
panud
Mr. Beach do think 60 h proper hand mp printed
copy OF AZ Argument u the other slde.
Mr. sbe4TnAn-I have given you a copy
Mr. Beach-You have JUS, handed pretty time!
Giving time 20 answer.
Judge Nelson-I GO not need L. THE Judge refused to take
the printed copy say separating, TO meet
again until Mouuay that would remind the jury not 10
read the newstaqrs This utiEaon viii be acceptable
from the observations which have fallen from counsel as 20 the
comments Of the newspapers and spirit which some
editors are disposed refer 20 the case and to tie
paroles n it and 20 possibly discuss the questions
/ sid this morning That ! making the
last appeal thai make % hc editors Of the newspapers
and should not occupy time Of tue Court by reference vol
UNFAIRLY 20 that matter mentioned THAI had received
letters from intelligent gentlemen abroad complaining Of some
newspapers calling my attention % the remarks Of
other editors IN regard 10 vha published Al THIS
uin aamoni-h you more than my mere wo-ds can, 70
refrain from reading the papers. Ar I said, this IL a
solemn duty your part and you must feel the
weight Of H. and have doubt You viii carry out the
suggestions mace by the Court entirely and with the best nien
ton WeW now adjourn unt Il clock Monday morning
The.COurt then adjourned