, 1875-11-10
THE SCANDAL-REVlVAl.,
Mrs. Mn1t1lon's Demand fur II
congregational Council.
views Of tho 7" Independent" the
Cougregatlonalist," and the
Rev. DR.. Burlington.
All Hold That Plymouth Church sI,o3id
and Will he Ijisfrliowxh;nrh.
THE "IHDSPENpENr"s "snp "cohnnsc.7,o.

UNI Will he IjfYfclioyxhinrd.
------.-...
,n1. nTt' CONGREGATION
1H,e rars Iadste,nf.nf unv>u. ,,,.x, ..u 10
Mrs, Moullou la. folt"xnd ~. p'', ~ 4Os. -"
nskinR Plymouth f,I,urr,, a., ,'';. n.y. "sF pro1ess
e1''"s htitahi Council tn cousidnr Tho grioY
hhce ot her SUMMARY cxcjson. and aim m
nounees to the church that II IL n, III na"loo. 49,
consider ier .oauo,t si,, r,,t ar"a "oe'est y
0''ea "'Biee1 a. refusal. aud proco1sI t,
ca1I an ek fafte Council. Tlis result which PIy
mouth Church has tried to avid las I'm, ,,,,,,
upon her. and her ereIeeiastfcM isajatiou !, vo-,
rrr # ."a.'m
~. ."..,. "'" ~. n"e,S 'hat u was TO ayoid jur.
sam result that tho rule was a1opled undo,
which Mrs. Monlton VIA dropped She vas or
pected 10 ask for letter to so,no o.hor cturcl,
| u,,n,, IT, "oula eo 1uitosalbl0 to grant.
"n'n. NJ 'Ao budding Of tho Church aud its las
toF' she had bcon branded u = perjnrcd slsu-
fused sho would haya a ri,i,t ~ ] n,," ~ 'e,
| Ia con,dor ,l,, o.,..s. ~ eau conhe'4
a1atI IT,. es s'''"nce' ~ was probably to
",D'4 |u1' IontlpkepeY thas rule Tas passed
"p'cn "ond allow her nans 10 DO dropped. But
thoy did not toseaeo thst st,s wonld nr,,cs,
aRalnst this aetion, and juytify her lion att",',-
ace, nor that tbeir ow,, n,oat n tiitrnry .rnIica
tion Of tho rule to seyideut meu.har. T,lhIu,,
1ppoa,1nhlss io1 defo,'ne or iimo for considering
m. l.Iicetio' ~ ~ enaieh; you'd afford abund
OF tue finding OF tpp UUtocjt t,,ara nm ho IA
lie doubt. Tho large Council. aIrcndv sn ra,,nt,,
r. TUG annals Of this sal aaf, settled that nat.
WA nna sosv ,',,,a, iho ciso OF Mr. Ttlton
dronnnd NJ thncn H. liAo inla. lio wAs simply
While persiHting ID presenting chnrvss a.,a;ns:
hsteta H.. .aut ~ AafActat' Ihs Council re-
vinw or IL ~ansae o. nsttl!s isfegular; Int. III
Uhmrch sdv;ss', e1I,,tasnhs th. uAdo by Plymouth
msintained' H;n ~, 'Ih.etnA' h lela9'ons oe still
nhmIcl, ,,,.r ss,;atx, .no nope ssIht plymouth
annn ~ r. na.siY !uese churches of itH accept-
nnsod =, -" a,.sp p1'ne'pioa Whleh It LAS boen Hup-
parativs1v sI;"h. ,,,., nn. aaat vas fhon co,n-
ginf,nr ans Tia "in:r,an'y ei,srmaa H. hox most
Gilton ali M. ,o,,e sna1Hos anoh mado by Afr.
orsncv viii, to.a . ~ "reminiscences aud fla
~ NJ W. Wn, n"se nnp M mao against alr. eacner
t6n waa ra.,,aat,o aau no.'eo Blven 70 Hr. TIL
tIls case Of esonanto s;nais Gns' aud M not, Is 10
act,an ~ H. ~ o.o arg: Moulton, asainst the
tra,siv uroad ~. 1nt on tue contfaE7, ox-
eeasai =. r. 10 a&o ~ nv nou's:tendsnce
1n,,a ~ ~ 49,, 1. "o oeieso that IL I'D.
fool oomnelnd ~ ,aha a' NJ suas tno council Will
aatton ~ .ua% s snntsh snah Withdraw from Its
hv Sfrr Mnutta ~" hs ~ MeGs eae cnargeH n,ads
or Of Mr. HaerI,ar 's. = ~, oasnoe OF hpr
to vitlldraw tnor fsttos .t,.n W tno
!, Ihis ia not our Judgment alone, but that NJ
re ne highest dono1nnauoual authority. Tho
80 - w !ota!ng Journal In its
most approved liyine antEo,,;v Ds. ., ,nextort sha
hetory and methods Of hs bedye p Th, ~, n,nas sns
- its iset issue did not anticipate Ills Council
sa 1Gs9a ~ Mts: houlton; but it dooarad that tic
6ayn bean m nt'e-tg asI t!y'aontt Church
Which convened tho l.st 1nsii Ias are ena eouisnes
obligation to call It togetLsr again. n saw. unaoF
VS. do mt see, however. in ,shsa rav M
uuastAnoes va ran scl, rTs - Aue1 LIE eat-