The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS.

ALBANY HcU b, 1870
Morgan VS.. Sklddy.-Motion to revive the case In
the name of the executrfx granted. Samuel Hand
for motion.
Stlllwell vs. Carpenter.-Motlon for reargument.
8. B. Stillwell for motion, Samuel Hand opposed.
Remttitur stayed till motion be decided.
No. 10. Turner Va. Reges.-Motion to dismiss the
appeal on the ground that no undertaking Is filed.
A. II. Robertson Tor motion.
The People ex rel. Stemmler and another VS.. Nc
Guire.-MOtion to dismiss appeal Nelson J. Water.
bury ior motion, 5. Hand opposed. The Court took
The Chapman Slate Company. appellant, VS.. Ell
Sutcil Observation-Disclosures to dismiss appeal.
Q. ID. NJ. Baker for motion; Wilbur Shaw opposed.
The Court took the papers; further points to be
submitted by Mr.. Snaw.
APPEALS FROM ORDERS.
No. 293. William Arthur, respondent, W. Eliza
lants.-Argued by William q. Holbrook, OF counsel
Tor appellants, and by A. G. Hand ior respondent.
GENERAL CALENDAR.
No. 4SH Elsie Magrim ct al, respondents vs.
William B. Dinsmore, as President, &C., appel
lan's Argument resumed and concluded.
NO. ", John ii. More, respondent, vs. Thomas B.
Rand, ct al, ppellants.-Argued by 8. w. Fuller
ton. of counsel for appellants and by VIM. A.
No. l04. VIM. BOokstaver, ct al, respondents,
VS.. b. q. jayne impleaded, &C.. appellant.-Ar-
gued by Walter W. Holt, OF counsel for appellant,
and Z. G. Sprague, for respondents.
No. 45. People, &c, appellants vs.. Thomas O.
Chalmers, ct AL, respondents-Argued BY Nelson
Bangs for respondents
DECISIONS.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.-The Mechan-
ics' u Traders National Bank, OF New York, VS..
Brow; Slawson vs.. the Albany Railway; Hackley
vs.; Draper; English ADMINISTRATIVE VS.. Brennan.
Judgment reversed new trial granted, and
costs to abide the events.-Larned vs. Hudson.
Inc judgment against Walbridge affirmed, with
COSTS, and the Judgment as to the other defend
ants reversed, and new trial granted costs TO
abide the event.-HOag vs. Lamont.
Judgment Of the Supreme Court and the de
cree OF the Surrogate reversed, and the proceed
lngS RENTED to the SurrOgate for a rehear.
ing OF the claim and q resettement of the
am0unt.-Elmore vs. jacques
Judgment modified by deducting 1921 so, the
amount oil interest included In the report at the
date OF the report and as so modified. Judgment
affirmed without costs to either party IN this
C0ufS-Smith vs. Vene, Abner II Co.
order affirmed and judgment absolute for PLANT
York Central aud Hudson River Railroad Com.
pany.
appeal from the order OF December 90, 1878, dis.
missed, and order OF April IL, 1874, affirmed, with
| cOsis-Bartett VS.. Mcneil.
| order OF General Term reversed and Judgment
lates to deduct from the verdict $i,574 a. the DIFF
| ference between the value OF the wheat allowed
| upon the trial and the value OF the wheat at the
time OF The conversion, neither party In that event
| to recover costs In this Court against the other
! II the plaintln does not stpulate within thirty
affirmed and Judgment absolute for defendants
with costs.-The Manufacturers and Traders o
Buffalo vs.. The Farmers and Mechanics Bank o
Buffalo and others.
Motion to stay proceedings denied, without
ts..-ThOmpson VS.. Tracy, executor, &c.
Motion Tor reargument Denied, with $40 COSTS
} Dowdney vs.. McColiomb. McGrath VS.. New Yorl