, 1875-08-06

time to put In that notice Gil that wst required by tho
1et.osto tho rss'on bell r y.
ing shs criticisms upon the meaning. Of
ths Supreme Court In that That 'hn taw did not
ND s saut ES h 1nea Ii L .a. M s r.
Asv,'nent in .he suprem. Court. !" ,od thlna,
things" [I.sughtef.1 lencs tho nnca IN void srd II
no thtng Tns CITY Tax Act does not now furnish ua
Nth .hs information for making he order Of thu
statute 10 enter an order Of ssr bec3," We c.nnot
anywhere get the or searA for wh!r tho la n
as ase ea IT, 70 a.n 'n:e' u. rh s
formation ior that purpose. TnIs conxsruc-
ton of uers lar.. !. eesm. 70 me-, y
TIM Courts 10 eirs laws apparently contctlag .ucb
e,nstruct!on Io'ei,Ie =" that aot1 may s.And. ~
il the Intention of tLr npslatnse In The parasgo
Of the CITY Tax act and the aH:endmtnts th"reto-ex-
cett II. lat ameptmcat rerA.pa-shst 1t fnu:ti b.
tA1sa OF incoraTated cities In tn Hate, aud By fts
reference to tbe Genera! ,venuo s.an~ the Legi.la
tura did BOT sncan IN any scnac rrisa ~ n'sfe1-
tlpu Of the ueutra4itevenue law but that tho irnvsr
lona Of that law hAould stand intact. 81 TINT
the CITY Ta1 act aeetl to haye b*rn pat.ed, might
elect 10 collect theis iarrr either under that act
ssa s II, Ii IL. ,
stand, 70 far AZ i IL Affected " tho old Bee. n
leaving tha discretion to the cities to act under ur
under tho aen.r.l 1ssronue '.~. an, teasta ~ Of tn"
rrnvipIona Of the General Revenue law III fn f'rre
and effect. And the only difficulty there ts In the mat
Legislature !nteuded it eloul d. Tho objocl!on 70
No. l, Mr. Clerk, will tc sualktn.1.
JUDuE AICEEy,
ho recovered from tie oYecta of the or!n
ton, saId: rise, yons Honor. to msks4 suggesting.
The grounds upon Which tic objection III tAth
Nh. has been sueainod arc grounds applicable III
their nature 10 Ill the uhcf to which obIecnn-
have been ade. aud Of 'urne. without further light
.e objections 70 each md every lot In earl aud every
| caro- uheEo objections bAyo been made. desire.
renss md . ernssrassnlens to tho pubhc sha. your
lIonor viii allow ths city 1t once 70 take appeal
srorn tas decision Just Insde ia thi. ease TO
shall be continued from term to term until de-
c!'ion In ti.t cass can b had from Tue snpEene
soaad l.., of sou1.s tteI vi, iaerai bat il ,ho
Supreme Court sAuuld take different vte~ Of Tie
SUBJECT and sbould hold hat lhs record In h.
suea thas Judgment ought to to rendered .s4tnat the
lo1 md laua. u 3ou!d not .e rtgns .hat tho city
o proe<sa for % sns setlss'ion d ot tha
fnsIs the decision sAund is ultimately against tbs
city for the collection Of these until next year.
ceed further In thr consideration Of any objections
the o&her 1t hs term If the COURT but furnish
us With tha facility Of taking this 70 the auprcme
Court
Mr. robey. vho wss Immediately interested In caso
No: J. a.d 10 ob1eetion to this arrangement,
| ANT PROVISION ron THE BALE
on Tho continuance Of the cases.
iagO neass s'Sa tSeee as "a ss In Sc le
rendered until too late to make lhs saie hs Court
could etys judgment for ths taxes, and make such
The tourt-IIow atuut casrs where Judgment has
already bcen entered by deFault7 Ihsy can 60
| under tho present notice Of elle7
Judge Dieksy-Ycs,
| THE OTHER IAwTgna
Mr. shoreT hoped the ntotinn would not b enstr..
tAsuet. Is wxutcd tie letlston II follow the Usual
course aud did not why the lsi97nta should not
hs entitled TO the frasl. Of their judgment.
ts ns
he thought Ainga should be left 10 take tho ordinary
Mr. ssurgss thought II WAS no. in tho power Of the
Court to legally gFant tue continuanco, The city
ought not In sLa c.se 70 hsys any more privilege.
IN be.f ot tho citizens he represented, that they
snsis!ed to proceed 10 trial aud have decision
9sass 9esae. ssa IA me va. es aens lss them len,
thoy had ta!r legal rights and .ensdiet Mr. Borden
! wanted tim other cahez to come up. He Nas anxious
for lustice, AMI did nut reEoise any provision in Se
IL for the Indefinite continuance Of tho cases. Il
er easss and 10 datsr judgment until they sArne u
Tho time xss elupaiug when tho sale should be made
Ths Court@The I only serious ~ aasstion shers i. Ia
that mentioned by IL. Hurd and Mr. sborey,-that
the continuance may opeFsse to cut OF the gsuslsen
fFVM arguing their caata.
Mf. Adams sa!d tley would consent to their making
/
this case how uAuy different Judgments would this
Court give. aud what would be the form Of tho judg
The Oourt-Counael for the city take the respond.
bility - u vsleihos they ran Proceed Afterwards Of
not; . They seen 70 have 'nse.s'gascd lilo question
Mf. HuTd did not ihink il was policy, eyen Il til,
suggestion Of the counsel for the city. to Ito up thel1
| property On any uncertainty.
Ar. AdAma auggeatod that ths property was tied NJ
anyhow.
ter.l lie aad tie Representatives. Of tho city nat
atoady taken good many r!'ks 1ls represented ths
Judge Dlckey-wno employed 5ou7
I smployed myself. insist. aud that Ia the seasor
why came into the court aud objected. sIall havs
wholesome law. aud tho property shil not be tied up
rapcl osery insinuation from she gentlemen. The,
have departed altogether from law. In tho tax l.vl
Tnss no
aw thsy undsf.ook to make n but their patchwork
Mr.. Ala.ns 4atd 1t seemed to hin, thst the motor
nato was very re.s"usb!e one. ns"thrr Iiurd hat
iayar. md : citizen. but lu! not offered
ioairai reason why the Court ahou!i not e1er!so u
a saaMa's 81 s p Sas s ;s
EFore.tyi w.. aa e. asR;1o4 TOT judgment by ~
ls74 boca,ns lien the lst dsy Of May, without
Ms .ta.uta i wss III. statute xhlca GRATED Tho In
a a' prop
nr. Ioty then addressed the Court, showing tha
sdens IL d. Federal md supreme Court. ''~
Further discasaton ensusd. md IN .gsse1neat bs!n
Mn. TuLrY ordareTrD .
tho ohjectors Should lsk Judgment 60 agslnSt them
aud thu cascs could then cosnu up.
WITH universal spproy1i. CoIusol for tho objsetat
kept pouring In ressona against the continuance III
Haln ono ben9 tha poor chance they al bad ~ d!sns