New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-05-04

OF inc c3pht1l nave 10 say I'D IL VIII
hardly be, fear, the soft answer which turneth
away wrath The rebuke Of The Times is deserved,
but it will not be likely to moderate the arrogance
and the dOmineerng disposition which has given
rise 10 the complaint, and this OCCASION TO most
Of the existing terror in Europe.
After all which, may come back with clear
conscience to Or. Kenealy. High politics have taken
mp large part of my letter that he will scarcely
have his fair share. There ia not really much TO tell
however and he will have his revenge shortly. Pur-
suant 10 notice, he asked the First Lord Of the
Treasury whether he would give him Government
night 10 bring on his postponed motion about the
Tichborne trial. Mr.. Dsraeli took care to preface
his reply by an intima.iOn that it was the general
feeling of the House, and not the desire Of DR..
Kenealy which led him 10 consider the request But
before be granted IT, he must know what the motion
In its present form it was only motion to call
attention to the trial. and also to certain incidents
Of the said trial which have occurred subsequently
thereto"the latter manifest bull which MI Dsraei
prOfessed himself quite unable to comprehend.
DR.. Keneay at first retOrted that his notice was
good notice as il stood. But the Speaker told him
the House was entitled TO know what the motion
would be with which he said he should conclude.
The Doctor tbereupOn pointedly said that in answer
to the speaker-nOt Mr.. Disraeli, that is-he gave
notice he should move either for Select Committee
or a Royal Commission to inquire into the com
plaints he was to make of the conduct of the trial
Mr. Disrael then said Dr. Kenealy could have the
very next evening Mr. Bright promptly inter
posed with the suggestion that this was not treat
ing DR.. Kenealy fairly TO expect him to proceed on
such short notice-nor fair TO those who might de-
sire TO take up the cause of the Judges. DR.. ke-
nealy on being asked whether he objected, said he
was III with bronchitis that his papers were IN the
country, that other papers to be moved for IN
the House, and that he had expected Tuesday week
wOuld be fixed. Eventually they compromised on
FRIDAY Of this week and on Friday, accordingly II
is understood we are to have the beginning Of the
end.
There were other personal incidents and at least
one question Of privilege during the same evening
4 Mr.. Bulwer 9. c., and member for Ipswich, has
undertaken to be the champion of the Lord Chief
Justice against Mr. Whalley After Mr.. Wlallcy's
speech last week Mr.. BulWer wrote to inquire Of
Sir Alexander Cockbun whether he ever-ls Mr..
Wbaley -aid-asked DR.. Kenealy to consider what a
disastrous effect, socially and morally, would follow
if the jury should find the claimant TO be TichbOrne
after 40 many lords ladies, and gentlemen had test-
fed he is not. This the Lord ChicfJustce with his
usual moderation of language, pronornces so prepos-
terously absurd and ridiculous ~ 10 carry its own
rcfuatiOn with il. He declares il absolutely dcst-
tnte of the slightest shadow Of foundation" He
never said anything that by The most reckless per-
version could he tortured into such meaning. And
much more 70 the same effect. Mr. Justice Meor
and Nr. Justice Lush cOuntersgn the letter. But
Mr. Whaliey not IA be convinced nor danntcd
He thinks there is evidence for bis statement and II
going 10 look itIp.
Mr.. Lowe was kept during most of these dis"us-
SONS waiting at the bar Of the House to bring mp his
report from the Foreign Loans Committee respecting
the publication Of the Herran letter about Capt PIN
in The Times and Daily NGWs. Nothing could be 50
simple The letter was read and taken down by the
reporters, who afterward asked TO be permitted to
compare their report with the letter itself. The
Other reporters did not. That is the whole mystery
and one would suppose Mr.. Charles Lewis, who had
raised such storm about so slight thing, would be
glad to have it forgotten. Not he. The Committee
added that they thought IT would have been
unjust to Herran, as Minister Of Honduras i'll
Paris 10 suppress his denial of the charges Capt PIN
had brought against him. SO Mr.. Lewis gives
notice he win ask Mr.. Disraeli to night if he Is
going TO do anything about the report and If not, he
will himself raise another question OF privilege
hone he WILL though have no hostile feeling 20 him
or 10 Capt Pun But the process Of pulverlzauon to
which Mr.. Lowe will subject him VIII afford the i'm
partial spectator an intellectual pleasure. G. VS.