The Worthington advance. [volume] (Worthington, Minn.) 1874-1908, 1875-01-01
ri" -" woR7HMcroN MINNESOTA. FRIDAY JANUARY /, 1875
1lL1ok'S REPLY. TO .BEEcAER.

! )1l1oh's REPLY. TO .BtEcAER,
From the New York Sun, Dec 26.] y. /.
Theodore Tilton has addressed the
following cardto the public concerning
the two trials, the one civil and the
other criminal, involving the controver.
sy with the Rev. Henry Ward Bcecher
Mr.. r1LroN's CARD.
Mr.. Beecher's pronunciamcnto in the
Christian Union this week requires
me to reply as follows:
! l. have charged the Rev. Henry
Ward Beecher with seduction and adul.
terry. These charges I have already
proved to the full belief Of. :three.quar.
ters ofathe people of this nation. includ.
ing almost unanimously. the legal pro.
fcssion, who, above all other classes,
are most competent to weigh evidence.
[ now wait to repeat and solemnize this
proof in court Of law. TO this end.
two actions are pending in the City
Court Of Brooklyn. These are, first, a
civil suit instituted by me against Mr..
Beecher; second, a criminal indictment
procured by Mr.. Beecher against me.
The first Of these causes, namely,
mine against him,is continually thwart.
ed by his strange and unexampled de-.
mand for catalogue Of tho particular
dates and places at which he commit.
ted his acts Of adultery. What is the
practical effect of this demand? The
sexual intimacy between Mr.. Beecher
and Mrs. Tilton extended accord
ing to their own account Of it, from the
fall of 1868, through the whole Of 1869,
into the spring Of l870--overlapping
three successive years; and yet Mr..
Beecher, while publicly asking for what
be calls the fullest investigation, re-
lquests me to dwarf and shrivel my
Iproof of this prolonged criminality to
two particular days, namely Oct 10 and
| II, 1868; q Limitation which his counsel
arc willing to enlarge SO as to include
an entire autumnal month, during
NEST Of which Mr.. Beecher was absent
from Brooklyn, sheltered in safe alibi
beyond an opportunity for crime. 1t
is an affront to ethics and equity, and
a miracle impossible, to limit Mr..
Beecher's fourtee months of adulteries
to two days.
UNWILLING TO APPEAR IN A FARCE.
Accordingly I give the public due no.
tice that, so far as the civil suit is con-
cerncd (which is the only one controlled
by me, I shall 60 into court on the
first day when am permitted to carry
all my evidence with me, but never
while I must leave nine-tenths Of this
evidence outsiie the door. In other
words to try Mr.. Beccher for adultery.
with the adultery carefully forbidden
to be proved, is farce at which am
not harlequin enough to play in these
sad days.
II. Meanwhile. since Mr.. Beecher is
seeking to battle my case against him, l
challenge him to end this by.play Of
strife over bill Of particulars by call.
ing up his case against me. This he
has power to do at any moment. What
is this case! On the Sd Of October last
Mr.. Bcecher went before Grand Jury
in Brooklyn, and by his own oath pro-
cured against me an indictment for IL
bel. This indictment furnishes the best
case to test the real issue between Mr..
Beecher and me. This real issue
is not whether he shall pay me
a hundred thousand dollars for running
my home Though not penny of this
money would l accept, even if hun
dred juries should multiply it to a
million>, but simply whether the Rev.
Henry Ward Beecher is guilty Of seduc-
tion and adultery. And whatever COM
plications may exist in my civil action
against Mr.. Beecher for damages, elicit.
ing his ceaseless demand for particulars,
on the other hand, simplicity itself is
not more simple than Mr.. Beecher's
criminal case against me for libel if l
have accused him falsely. In this Grim.
inal case shall neither trouble him for
particulars, nor drive him from the
special term to the general, nor drag
him to Albany to the Court of Appeals,
nor compel him to try his cause with a
mere tithc of his evidence, nor in any
manner impose on him a gossamer's
weight Of difficulty in his bringing me
to justice. Moreover, in his criminal
case he will be relieved of his iIl-omened
fears of civil damages; he will have the
attack instead Of the defense; he will
be entitled to the last word to the jury;
and If have borne false witness against
him he will be able not only TO prove
mo guilty. but to send me to the peni-
tentiary.
CHARGES OF TRlCKERY.
III. am advised, and believe, that
the cunning managers Of Mr.. Beecher's
safety are seeking to contravene the
ends of justice by the following strata.
gem, to.wit: as soon as Mr.. Beecher's s
counsel shall have restricted me so as
to make inadmissiblc my proofs Of his
fourteen months of adultery thus cut.
ing the very hearts core out of the
civil suit,) their plan then is to sudden
|ly withdraw the criminal indictment
against me which withdrawal is to be
explained to the public by Mr.. Beech
er's chief champion and fellow.sufferer
under charge of seduction. the editor
of the Brooklyn Eagle, as an act ct
unexampled magnaminity shown to me
by Mr.. Beecher.
By this plan Of operations l am to be
prevented from trying Mr.. Beecher in
a civil suit; Mr.. Beecher is at the same
time to be saved from the grim neces
lsity of trying me under the criminal in
dictment and so, by these two devices
Mr.. Beecher is to escape trial alto
|gether.
respectfully request all fair-minded
lpersons to unite in determining tha