davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
Scrap-BOOks.

A splendid assortment of SCRAP-BOOKS
have been expressly prepared for the holiday
season and no present OF more permanent in-
terest can be selected for gentleman or lady,
old or young.
No. l-Half-bound cloth sides, gilt-back,
$50 pp., l2xl6 inches.................... S5 90
No. Battle-Ground, cloth sides, gilt-back,
500 pp., l2Xl6 inches ............ ...... %
No. 3-Full morocco, beveled boards, gilt
and antique, very rich, 800 pp.... IL 90
I.ettered to order in gold at % cts. per line.
Sent by mail postpaid on receipt of the price.
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
Again Postponed. .

At regular meeting of the Board, held De-
cember ith, 1874, the time ut which the pay
ment of the above assessment became delin-
quent, was again postponed to January I'd,
1876. l.. M. HOLT,
decl0tf Secretary
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
FINANCIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
GOLD REPORT.
SAN FRANCISCO, February l.
Gold, 1l2ss.
Greenbacks-Buying.s 80; selling, S9h.
san Francisco Marlets-By Telegraph.

san Francisco Marlkets-By Telegraph.
SAN FRANCISCO. February |.
FL0UR-S5 00a5 371S.
WHEAT-Sl 50@l go.
BARLEY-$l 40dal 60.
0ATS-sl 70al 80
RYE-Sl 4091 So
HAY-Sl2 50tasli so.
WOOIs-15920c.
ONIONS--sl 50a1 65.
CORN--Sl SIS. tti f7
BEANS-214Qg5c.
HOPS-30a32l4c.
COTTON-Sl412.
.POTATOES-$1 75612 90.
SWEET P0TATOES--Sl 0092 CO.
BUTTER-40@50c.
CHEESE-l39l7c
EGGS-35013715c. per doz.
PEACH ES-SI09l rs U box.
APPLES-SldSl 75 7B box.
FIGS-37a50c. v ID.
HONEY-20Ce27c. % fb.
BAC0N-l4@l5c.
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
POSTPONED m ENT.

AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF
IA Directors Centinela Land Company jan
uary 5, 1875, il was
Res0tUed, That owing to the inability OF the
surveyor to complete the surveys and prepare
the necessary maps of the subdivisions OF the
Centnela Ranches, it is expedient to adjourn
the sale of the lands of the company from the
18th day Of January until the 18th day of Feb
ruary, 1875.
BY order, w. II. j. BROOKS,
Secretary.
N. BAH tho newspapers which have the
advertisement OF the Ccntnela for the sale of
18th inst. please copy and make correction in
advertisement. w. ii. j. b.
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS.
CERTIFICATE OF PARTNERSHIP

OF THE FIRM OF CAREY & THOMAS,
~ doing business in the city of Los An
geles, county of Los Angeles, State of Califor-
MIA
We, the undersigned persons, hereby certify
that the above described partnership is com
posed of tho following persons and no others,
whose names and places OF residence are as
follows, to-wit:
Thos. A. Carey, Los Angeles.
Milton Thomas, Los Angeles.
In witness whereof we have hereunto af-
fixed our hands and seals this nineteenth day
of January, 1875.
THOS. A..GAREY, (Seall
MILTON THOMAS. [SeaE1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Los Angeles. s.ssS
On this nineteenth day of January, In the
year A. ID. 1875, before me, Court Commission
er for said county, personally appeared Thos.
A. Carey and Milton Thomas, known to me
to be the persons whose names are subscribed
to the within instrument, and acknowledged
to me that they executed the same.
Witness my hand, having no official seal,
this nineteenth day OF January, A d. 1875.
GEORGE G. GIBBS,
Court Commissioner of Los Angeles Co.
ia 20
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
STATE OF CALIFoRNIA,
Assessment Notice.

TRANGE COOPERATIVE COMPANY
W of Los Angeles-Location of Principal
place of business: Los Angeles, California.
Notice is hereby given that at meeting OF
the Directors held in this city on the 3ist day
of July, 1874, an assessment mo. y of FIVE
DOLLARS PER SHARE was levied upon the
Capital Stock Of said Company, payable I'M
MEDIATELY, in United States gold coin, to the
Secretary, at the office of the Company, No. Al
Temple Block, Los Angeles, California. Any
stock upon which this Assessment shall re-
main unpaid on the lstday of September, 1874,
will be declared delinquent and advertised for
sale at public auction, and unless payment is
made before, will be sold on the
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02

Each monthly part will contain sx superb
plates, with accompanying descriptive matter,
and whether for binding or frtlning, Will be
entirely beyond competition in price or ariis-
tic character. Every impression will be most
carefully taken on the finest toned paper and
no pains will be spared to make this the
richest production of press which has won
in marveously short time, "a worldwide
reDutation.
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
18th day Of September, 1874,

To pay delinquent assessment, together with
cost of advertising aud expense of sale.
BY order of the Board.
J.. M. HOLT, Secretary.
Office: No. Al Temple Block, Los Angeles
California
Dated July 81. lS74
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
THE LONDON ART JOURNAL.

Each part will contain 26 quarto pages, in
cluding the heavy fiont-piece, on heavy plate
ated in red and gold, will be given with the
first part, and the printing of the entire work
will be Il worthy representation of the alden
Press" which is guarantee of something
beautiful and valuable
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
At a Cost Of IS cts. a Part.
RTs I, ii and III, ARE JUST PUBHSHI
THE ART JOURNAL,

Complete in twelve monthly parts, at 81 each.
Reproducing the best full-page illustra-
tions from the earlier volumes
of THE ALDINE
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
LETTER LIST.

List OF letters remaining In the Los Angeles
Postofice Monday, February /, 1875 To OBJ
tain these letters say "Advertised." All let
ters not called for in 30 days will be returned
TO the Dead Letter Office:
x.nruc,
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
REP PRODUCING

At price within the popular reach, engrav-
ings never before offered at less than five
times the amount. These plates have been
Z ha att rnctinp of
Los Angeles daily herald., 1875-02-02
The Aldine COmpany's
NEW PUBLICATIONS
SOLD ONLY BY SUBSCRIPTION.
Parts 1, II, III and ~, are now ready:
SUTTON'S
LeiSure Hour. Miscellany

To be completed in forty parts, issued fort-
nightly. Each part will contain an elegant
front-piece, originally engraved on steel for
the London -Art Journal,
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
NETWORK DAILY TRIBUNE FRIDAY MAY H. ls75-TRpLE SHEET

Mr. EgglestOn's examination was short. He repeated
in substance the statements alleged to have been
made to him by MI. Bowen, and which Mr. Bowen
had denied
Horace b. Clahin and Charles Storrs were success
sively called to the stand by the defendants coun
sell Both Of them declared that they had never be-
fore the document asserted to be the submission
to arbitration agreed upon between Mr.. Bowen and
Mr.. TiltOn, and written by Mr.. Moulton. They sub
stantially reasserted the points Of their evidence
which had been called in question by Mr. Bowen.
George w. Uhler, the owner Of the house In
Clinton-st. occupied by Mr. Moulton in 1871, and
Wallace Z. Caldwell, were both called by the de-
fendant to contradict the statement that there
no portrait of Mr. Beecher in Mr.. Mouton's house in
ClintOn-st Both swore that they had seen large
portrait of Mr. Beecher in the paror of that house
when 1t was occupied by Mr. Moulton.
John c. Southwick was called for the defendant
to contradict some of the statements of Mr.. Wood
ruff, but much of the evidence which it desired
to draw from him was ruled out On the CrOss-ex-
animation of this witness Mr.. Beach caused much
merriment by abruptly asking him if he had any
bets the result of this trial. The witness admit
ted that he had had bet of 800 Of that kind, but
had withdrawn it in anticipation of being called as
a witness MI Southwick was the last witness for
the defendant.
The plaintiffs counsel called John Eliot Bowen, a
son of Henry c. Bowen, who swore that in 1S7O-he
thought it in December of that year-he had
delivered note from his father to Mr.. Freeand. and
received the reply, III attend to it," OF something
equivalent TO that.
Marshall J. MOrren, an architect, was also called
for the plaintiff. He brought with him drawing
which he had made of the rear of Mr.. OvingtOn's
house. and the situation of the adjoining buildings.
lie iptau N
Of Mr.. Martin that he and Mrs. TiltOn had sat on
the back piazza of Mr. Ovington's house to find a
cool place OH the afternoon when Gen. Tracy and
Miss Bessie Turner had their interview At that house
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
LIMITATION OF THE TESTIMONY.

Mr. MOIlls-NOW, II your Honor plclSt yes
rerday when was examining Mr. Monitor, and when |
undertook to ask questions calling for contradiction OF
facts general facts they ocrtcd and your Honor com
pelcd me- every instance to read the precise language
and cOnne the cvdenre 10 strict denial of that Now
say your Honor il this general question IL asked
il opens the whole door; We have wiinesst'. and We
be permitted to bring the witnesses here and try
that issue and yor Honor cannot TELL nor any one else
II hs course is to be pursued in this examination. when
the examination Of the witness will end. In no
single instance in rbuttal were We permitted 10
Ash "a etun 70 dsproVc general fact in the ease but
n every instance We were met by an Objection, anu IN
every your Honor compelled us To turn to the
evidence and read the Language and put the precise ques
ton them. Now submit that the same rule should
applied to them that applied 10 us. II not then
want put witnesses TpOn the stand again and
pursue the examination We have number OF witnesses
tat desire Ia call II this is done, aud shall ask the
give us the opportunity. Ne can exhaust days
upon that subject II there is
Mr.. EysTts here rose 10 speak
Judge Nelson think have enough upon ihis sub
ee and will LET the witness answer this. do not want
any gmrnt upon the suiJcrt AN sorry yon put
the question
Mr.. Evarts-T do not propose Ia argue.
Judge Neison-I have said he answer YES or No.
unless yOn Withdraw the question
Mr.. Evarts-I going 10 state what Will be very
agreeable to yOur Honor II have an opportunity; and
that that under This distinct threat OF prolonged ex
animation that will be- given 10 the subject, Withdraw
the question.
Judge Noson-G recognize that very judicious and
fair performance Of professional duty the part Of
counsel.
Mr.. Evarts-I agree to that All these things are reE
tive and the gnitude OF question is Of course, some
times such compcls counsel 10 insist upon it, at other
times it does not agree they would have right TO
call witnesses on the other side OF this question. OF this
distinct question, whether there slips; and con-
that the interest OF the Republic il that should
come TO an end of this Laughter.
Judge Neil.on-Yes that il all, Mr. Witness
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
Mr.. BOWEN RECALLED FOR CROSS-EXAMI-
NATION

Mr.. Shearnan-If your Honor please, we de-
sire to recall Mr.. Bowen for few moments for further
crosse Examination lMr. Bowen took the srand.I
BY Mr.. shearnan-Mr. Bowen, you were asked on your
previous crossexamnation whether you recOIected
interview with Dr. Edward Eggleston. at your house
the afternoon Of the 26th Of Dec 1870 after your
from Mr.. Beecher's ask you now whether you still
have recollection OF that interview A. have
recollection it IN possible. but have recollection
OF il.
q. Do you reroect in such interview, that Occa
son saying Dr. Eggleston that Mr.. Beecher had told
you that an adopted daughter of Mrs Tton had told Mr.
Beecher that Mr. Tton had taken her ont Of her bed
night, anything 10 that eectf A. have no reeolIee
ton Of IL, Sir none whatever.
O. Nor anything in substance ike IL A. Nothing
whatever.
Mr. sheaYman-That Is all
Mr. Fullerton Mr.. Bowen what lime did you gave the
house Of Mr.. -
Mr.. shrarman-Oh, Mr.. Fullerton one other matter
Mr.. FlliertOn-Ccrtsiny.
BY Mr.. shearman-Do you rreoeet Mr.. Bowen, after
leaving he Of the arbitration between yourself and
Mr. T1on. April g. 1872. going away with Mr. Clafn
and Mr. stOrf A. rrcoIlect going with Nr. Storrs, but
with Mr.. Clahin IT IL possible, however, ne might
have been there. there all went, as peooi-
teet, aboW the same time
q Do you re~sect saying io either both OF Those
gentlemen. their presence that you desired have
Tue NOsrirtOfk W you anu uopeu Que vi
them would attend to it A. said nothing whatever
the subject, according TO my recollection.
q, De- you recolect whether Mr. Clain replied to yoa
srai tAa ws matter that Mr. storrs had better attend
tSf" A. sessIist nothing the subject; an posi-
tive you wish my statement that nothing Of the Kind
vasAAM.
JuAse Ieyson-I 80 understood you before, Mr. Bowen.
The witnsss-Yss, Sir; 80 stated before. desire to
stAt@ further. did not at that time that nothng
Az
arbitration.
JaASs helison-On that suhlecti
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14

stanally that" something like that and then would
reI%atErepeaed one thought and another thousnt, ~
the conversation that had immediately preceded this
Ss smv ths tbs my sst mart o tse
the making INSTEAD OF reading Of the memorandum.
Judge Neson-Mr stenographer. does the character
used for the word reading" also represent the word
"writingi"
The stenoHapher-No, Sir; IL does not look bit ike ~
Judge NeilsOn-Whati =
The stenographer-It does look at all like II.
Judge Neilson-They are totally unlikei
The stenographer-Yes, Sir
MT. Morrs-Then it turns ont that Mr.. shesrmans
reasoning was not correct
Mr.. shearman-I will appeal TO Mr.. Munson who u
quite experienced whether right. If you insist
upon it.
Mr.. Beach-Dont he all talking at once.
Mr Morris-Wen have q right TO talk, because had
the floor first.
Mr.. Blackwell. was trying to quiet Mr. shesrman'
Mr.. Morrs-You have got hard task
Mr.. Beach-No; not very hard.
Judge Neilson-Nery WE'LL gentlemen; am satisned.
Mr.. shearman-well, then your Honor. wish TO make
this explanation. Mr. Hunson spoke TO me across uo
table, saying that the time when practced phono
graphy fOr used to practice itwhen Nh lton dio, 'ne
system had changed told the system had chansed'
that there are four or five systems MI Muns'n
will bear me out that under the old Pitman eys'em'
"read" and write" were written very much anke-
lust little difference in the turn or crook That was
under Pitman's system.
Mr. Munson-That was very early; in the earlier eui-
tiOns IL was So
Mr. Morris-That 10 outlawed
Mr. Eyarts-we are not proceeding under that now !
we have asked the stenoapher to get his own nos au
give the correction
Judge Neson-Yes. Have We any more witnesses
Horace B. Clafn recalled on behalf OF the desn'
ant
Judge Neilson-GoOd morning, Mr.. Cafn.
Mr.. Clahin-GoOd morning eir.
Mr.. shearman-The paper is not in court upon VIM"
we proposed to examine Mr.. Cahin; Judge Morns haf
sent for ii.
Mr. Beaeh-Cant we do something else while ne IL
gonei -
Mr. shearman-M Clahn, we will exchange you ioi
another witness.
Judge Neison-Take a seat below for moment VT
Clafn.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
TpF CLOSING TESTIMONY.

The first witness put the stand by the defendant
Yesterday was Calvin j. Mills, who is engaged in
an editorial capacity dn The Nen- Ysst Hrd'd 1t
was sought to yrove ny him thaf the Woodhun scam
dal publication had been circulated Ia printed nlpe
prior to it's appearance In HoodhsA Casa~fs "ee'ds
After a good dead Of argument hy she osu1sd On
both sides the tnstnspy sf tfns witness was ru1ed
out by Judge Kaisnn. and M. Evarts withdrew the
question which bad already ben pat 10 him
Henry c. Bowen vas recalled ~ chs Defendant
f,r farther cpoesexxmsnstion. His appearance Gro
ated another Stir In de Sndieoce- lie came forward
with a quick. nHvuB Sosp. es~s hS testimony
Sriely. and sftr SolAe aboot i've minutes On the
stand stepped ASwu asza&n and disappeared among
abe spectatos lie substantially reiterated his
,sormer statements sacdmng the 0ms Of the alleged
sp,erview at Mr. Preeianfs hoase, and about the
Woodstock kssx, and his sllsesd ssassme0as to NJ
Tggleston.
The Rev. EawnA Eeefesen tnnediasefy followed
Mr.. Bowen in hs xstDc@ dradr Nj sheaSrA.
psked him If I'm soszps6o bid NJ Oianssd asss
bis Last appeasznD before IL Ooust- Well. bn
replied Ne EssesAtss. when vas has oshs
said was leetsper, author, and clergyn now
I'm principally clergyman, Sir. The lecturer ana
AuthOr have been rather sunk out Of Dght believe
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
THE TILTON-BEECHER TRIAL.
THE TESTIMONY ALL IN.

INTEREST TELT IN THE FINAL BvIDENCE-lARGE
AND ATTENTIVE AUDIEyCEs-CoUNsEL FOR THE
DEFENDANT OBTAIN AN ADJOURNMENT UNTIL
wEpNEsDAY-MR. EvARTs AND Ex-JUDGK PORTER
TO SUM UP FOR THE DEFENDANT, MR.. BEACH
FOR THE PrAINrIFF-THE LAST WITNESSES
BRIEF TESTIMONY FROM HENRY c. BOWEN, THE
RRv. EDWARD EGGLEsToN, II. B. CLAFLIN,
CHARLES sToRRs. GEORGE W. UHLER JOHN C.
sOUTHwICK, AND OTHERS
In the Tlton-Beecher trial yesterday the sur
rebuttal for the defendant was closed thus COM
peting the taking of testimony. AT the request OF
the defendants counsel the Court adjourned until
next Wednesday morning, when the summing up
for the defendant will begin. Calvin j. Mills,
Henry c. Bowen, the Rev. Edward EgglestOn, H. B.
Clahn, Charles Storrs, George W. Uher, Wallace f..
Caldwell, and John c. SOuthwick testified in sur
rebuttal for the defendant. Their evidence was
fragmentary, and principally in contradiction of
some of the plaintiffs witnesses. John Eliot Bowen
and Marshall j. Morrel gave minor evidence for the
plaintiff The audience was larger than usual Mr..
Evarts announced that only four OF five days would
be taken for the arguments of himself and Mr..
Porter Mr. Beach will consume only two or three
days more, and the case will probably close about
June /.
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
rnw.pD rGGLEsTON RECALLED.

Ry Mr.. Sbearman--Dr. EgglestOn, have an
impression that your occupation has changed since you
were on the stand before Wyou state how you are now
at present engaged "A. Well, Sir when was mere pe'o
said was lecturer author. and clergyman now, ."
principally clergyman the lecturer AMI adtbor nave
rather been sunk out Of sight, believe.
Q. Are you pastor OF any churchi A am pastor
Sir.
O. OF what churchf
Mr. Beaeh-Well. object TO going into the history oi
this gentleman; do Mt know what It is in reply to-
Judge Neilson-The witness bas not had time 10 write
book since he was here. lIaughter.l
BY Mr.. Shearman-Of what church are yon pasDrI
Mr. Beach, object 10 it,
Mr. Evarts-Then We will have 20 argue H.
Judge Neilson-No, rule it out without argument
He ia pastor Of church. and We have no curiosity
what 1t is
Mr. Eyarts-we have right 10 show what the wifneasf
position and employment is.
Judge Ncilson-Well that asked when lie vac here
before.
Mr Evarts-Well. il has charged
Judge Neison-That La not subject Of criticism.
M EvartsI agree but it would not take three min
% to nnd out what church.
M Beseh-That il no argument IN favor Of
MI Shesrman-Your Honor rules 1t cut, and except
Judge Neilson-I can't that IL Is material. now.
BY Mr.. shearman-In December 1870. did you have
any business relations with Mr. Henry C. BoveD' A.
did, Sir.
Q. What were theyi
hr Beach, object to that.
Judge Neilson-Oh! we will take that sir.
Mr. Beach-The business relations of this gentleman
with Mr.. B0weni
Judge NeilsOn-Yes by way OF bringing him In con
tact with him. suppose.
BY Mr. Shearman-What we're these rlatonsf A.
was his employee was employed by Mr. Bowen.
@ In what capsciryt A. In the early part Of Decrrn-
ber Sir, literary editor Of The Irdepenen and tho
latter part of December experimenting editor.
Q. Did Mr Bowen make appointment with you for
Monday December 90, at hfs housei
Mr.. Funertop-Now, that is a hading question
Mr.. shearman-I understand ! obliged to ask In
this form. / refer to . question and answer Of Mr..
Bowen.
Judge Neilson-Nell answer that
The wtness-It ia my recollection that he did Sir bat
am not positive that my meeting on Monday wss ny
appointment
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14

Mr. Fullerton-Now, I shall have 10 recall yon, nr
Bowen after the examination OF Mr. Eggesfon' ana "
Won will be kind enough to remain you will obligc me-
New-York tribune., 1875-05-14
CROseExAMINATION OF EpwaRp EGGLE
SrOE

BY Mr. Fullerton-You dou't Fesellect, un-
aeSstaad you whether Mr. Bowen SAID he bad peea -
Mr. Beecher. that ho hsd been u ses H. bcocoe' -
O dssv - fsr ysus hsnaaAsnsi - svoe 9
The daily gazette., 1875-08-25
The Threatened Negro !Iass0.
ere iu GeO1Oi0.

1t is easy enough for those who arc
far removed from the scene, and are
not in the midst Of similar population
to ridicule the excitement which these
Developments have caused. And vet
when the plot of negro instruction
was once discovered in New York, lit.
tie moro than c-ntury ago, alarm was
so extreme that it manifested itself in
tho most remorseiess cruelty, and the
accused blacks could not find LAWYER
who would see that they had a fair
trial in the courts. This SO called plot
which was never proved, created the
greatest panic, Upon evidence which
would now be considered worthless one
hundred and flfty-fcur colored men
and twenty whites were imprisoned
within six months, of whom seventy.
eight negroes were transported twenty
were hanged, aud thirteen burned at
the stake The people in the disturbed
districts OF Georgia are not likely to
fololw this example. An address issued
by leading men of that region 10 their
fellow citizens Is calm and unimpas.
stoned in its tone, and while cxpics-
sing doubt whether any serious dis.
turbance was contemplated by the
colored population, recommends care
fulness in having the sanction of law
In whatever action may be taken in
the premises, and to put down any at
tempt Of excited and irresponsible
parties at taking the law into their own
hands