The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-05-26
COURT Or APPEALS.
ALBANY. May 20. 1878.


DECISIONS.
Motion denied without costs.-Post VS.. Doremus.
Reargume mt ordered on tue ground that the
case being the last called before adjournment OF
tue Court or the term the parties were, for want
OF time deprived OF the opportunity Tor iuil oral
argument.-Stillweil vs.. Carpenter.
JuaEment reversed and new trial granted, costs
to ABIDE the eyent-MagnIn ". Dlusmore; Rohr-
back ". The Germania FIRE Insurance Companyi
Kirkland VI. Dnsmore; Hobart HoOart; Payns
VS.. Burnham Knapp VS.. Roche.
Judement atnrmed. WIN costs.-RohrnacE Va.
The .Etua Insurance Company hammett ~.
Barnard; Carblrd vs. BarrOws; Bradley vs. TIE
New YORK Central Railroad company. Ludlow vs.
Daie; Hill vs.. burke Crovinger w. ErOcKer; Max
imllIan VI. The Mayor: Haynes vs.. Ine American
Popular Lie Insurance Company; Saea Tue
Slxta Avenue Railroad Company; CoHSHng ".
.u,r; smith VI. The Gienn's FANS insurance Con-
Order granting new trial affirmed. aud judg
ment ior defendant on stipulation, with costs
Van Rensselaer, vs.. Tae Albany and West STOCK
bridge Railroad Company.
Oraer reversed and new trial granted, costs
20 apide eyent.-Tne People ex Iei. Frost Va
appeal dismissed without costs to either
order 81 General Term reversed and order Of
Special Tern affirmed, wtth costs.-Nnlv BaSkesen
order anrmcd, with costs.-N. X and wnuam-
son Rooney IL. JrOmbc M re Kelly We. 1Oran.e;
o'NaAenf " Belmont; SAM ". same.
Judgment afirmed.-AUD efprl w. Inc People.
Appeal alsmis ca With costs-Liamasas v.
Llamasas.
to ABIDE event unless plain ~ supulate 10 re-
duce tue recovery ana judgment 0y oeducung
VI
Guided Ia the report OF tue referee, amounting -
the sum 81 S.. 2i5 s. aud II tney so stipulate tie
judgment as so mOulncd affirmed without c0s,s
10 either party IN THIS cOurt-The Board Ol SUPER
visors 81 Monroe County vs.. Miller.
Tue following proceedings took place In ths
Court to-day
Clark VS.. Sickler.-MOtlOn TO restore 70 the cal
endar. Upon motion OF 4. l. Burney, Of counse
Tor appellant ordered that the cause lie placed
upon the next calendar AS 81 the place It occupied
o. the old calendar
King VS.. 6atvln.-MOtion 10 dismiss appeal. Tue
Court TOOK the papers.
GODFREY VS.. MOser.-Motion 10 amend notice %
appeal. On motion OF A. f. Slckles. for appellant
RESPONDENTS counsel consenung, motion granted
and notice ordered amended, IS per order THIS day
fled.
Gillespie vs.. Lttleocen.-Motlon Tor reargu.
ment; papers submitted
APPEALs FROM ORDERS.
NO. 2S3 The PEOPLE, ex rel Montague wood, re
spondent vs.. Thomas A. Asten e. al, appellants.
No. 236 The People eX rel. Teresa A. Doyle, re-
spondents vs.. Andrew Il. Green and other appel
lants.
10. 237. The People ex rel. Youngblood. re-
spOndent. We. The Board o. Assessors, appellants
No. rs Thomas Armstrong, respondent, Va
Smitn N. Weed, appellant.
No "a. In the matter ~ the petition Oh Eugene
Ketiletas 81 ydcate assessments.
80. rs. In the matter OF tue petition or Edward
BurEc 10 vacdte an assessment.
GENERAL CALENDAR
No 24l. George Schteflu plaintiff IN error, vs..
The People, &c. DEFENDANTS IA error.
No. 49,. Peter O'Wiillams and others execu.
tors, "a, respondents, ". The Town oil DuaneB
burg appellant.
Adjourned % Wednesday. May 20.
THE DAY CALENDAR.
Court or Appeals day calendar Tor Wednesday
May 26 ls15:-Nos 80, Is, 10, - :, ~, 20, IA, Is.