New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1875-03-20

TO let them know what dcues there were In the way '
prosecuting the chargesi A. That was one object
@ Was not that the principal obcctf A. Icannot reme"'
what was in my mind at the time A.,
@ Yes Did you say in substance TO the Comm'ee, VIZ"
Mrs Bradshaw informed you that she had said TO M' Inton
in substance as follows will not add pang 70 inc
agony that poor Elizabeth has already endured od
think said that in substance for that In substance VIVA
Bradshaw said to can tell you exactly WHAT IA"
say to the Committee.
Mr. Shearman-One moment, Mr. Halliday. now your
Honor IN order that counsel may not have an opportunity
to say that this has been brought In move 70
strike out that part the witness which says that tha'
was In substance what Mrs Bradshaw said
Judge Neison-I think properly part Of the statement
Mr. Eyar.s-we except, II your Honor please.
Mr. Fulerton-You did tell the Committee that' A. oio
and more, too.
O. Well lie: us have the "more too" [Laughterl A. sad
to the Committee that Mrs Bradshaw came TO me- think IL
about the ed October inquire would attend the
funeral Of Mrs Car and that after she had completed what
she had say regard that she then introduced hs mat
ter OF appearing as witness nst Mrs Tton and that she
should do it, she could not do IT. that Elizabeth had sa
to her Matte how you appear against mes sha sehd
the Committee aeer stating reasons for not appearing
O Did Won saw Mr. or Mr., Tilton, A. Mrs Tlton. made
no reply ~ all nor asked any questions heard her statement
and repeated it TO the Committee.
Mr. Fueron-Dd you understand that Mrs Bradshaws oo-
lection TO appearing before the Committee was that she coud
not prove the charger
Mr. Evars-That not the question: what he understood
He has told YOU exactly what he told the Committee.
Mr. Fulerton-That il my question
Mr. Evars-Your Honor has directed them to connne heh
selves TO what this said to the Committee He has tod
you all that he said TO the Committee
Mr. Fuleron-I ask the further question now, Sir II ne I'M
derstood from Mrs Bradshaw that she could not prove the
the charge against Mr. on so far as she was con-
cened, il she appeared before the Committee
Mr. T IN the CONVEX
saou as between him and and how prove the re-
suit Of conversation between him and her what ne undefood
from conversation between him and her.
Judge Neilson- don't think that will do Mr. Fullerton.
Mr. Fulerton-It proper Sir to show his motive
and the knowledge that he had At the time that he made this
communication.
judge NeisoThat appears from his statement Upon the
statement given the motive Of Mrs Bradshaw Is apparent
There is no suggestion inability her part to prove she
were called. but an indisposition to come
Mr. Fuerton-We did Mrs Bradshaw ever communicate 70
you willingness to cOmeafter thati
Mr. Sherman One moment. That is objected to-
M Eyars-The conversation between Mrs Bradshaw ana
the witness cannot be given in evidence.
Judge NesonWha further did you say to the Committee
then or afterwards, on that subIects
Mr. Fulleron-Wel II seems now that he communicated 10
Committee the fact that Mrs Bradshaw wac unwilling 70
core.
Mr. Fuleron-If information conveyed to him after
wards that she was willing TO come proper show that
fact?
Judge Nelson-Not material think.
Mr. peah-Or that he did not communicate TO the Com
| mtee; that he suppressed itg
Judge Nelson-I don't think 1t is very material
Mr. FueronIIad you any correspondence with Mrs Brad
shaw upon the subject? A. | had, Sir.
Mr. shearman-one moment; that is objected to Al