, 1875-06-05

= denl.l Of The alleged eptsng1omsu. OF
affections. Mr. DeecheE thsrofote credited
2 a. ana u WAS not until Mrs. TTlt,n's statom,ns
: 3sho Church Committee that hs learned ti,a,
: 'hle too "an m imposition. Hero
TIE LETTER or cosrniTyox
Hao rnhd, commencing: humble myro}f b.
lore Theodore TIltnn ~ do boforo tnr tluI,"--
which l}eecher nsd aIlou!d he, ~ h,lrpbo toY.
70 telf htfore f;od for ins error. an wiling 10
h'mbIc tnSsof before Theodore Til;oa." Then,
ho would hsyc besu b,tter man III nv
E'Ace. (which hc sayh IL substantially correct.
for no remembered With searn In hia eycs tho
sts'ico Iilton did BIN by rainssa.inx tis hon i.
to tfo, ahmy m waanFt}n aud 10 sad 70 hImself
nectrd tina: ho had acted ,indos thu tnpnlso OF
tt!as letsnr Of tho 2Gl md M doubt thought tha:
Iilson would not have dono 60, ad ttatlia might
not to have acted 60 hnsti;y. Tie re.t OF tho
letter wa. very general. Il viii not plead Tor tor
n'ynelf. will lilo bcfor@ anY one ttse shall ho
t"cnliated. Ny shouShte Aso go ng ont 10 tha,
roof child lvIng thelo with foilsh hands," Ike.
OF t1*s IN real!! hh. anl il ia confcssody .1ous-
ton report Or Beachers emotional e1prcsn;on,
carried to Tilton with tic v;nw OF cnnvtnciu,
nm that Denchns did mo- h2to him. Then " 10
lilo pulley Of Bilonce. 1}ucchnr waa wise tn lis
fotcrast that II i wsH once kl1wn that +ncl, =
wotnan a. Mira Tilson flat, nado Charge Of thst
a:roc'osls character, Which fsnsI.ea no g,larsn-
toy tha: it IL not fa'so1y charged men md woa1-
Ill 4HlHap ht4lA l9 AuC4EI. EnF II you
ray II is not compatible with = clargyr1anH
character. they say It IL not comnnt,blo
with tlo character Of t,ic!l woman 70 mako
such a., accusation falsely. We'll In!gII. BoecAer
fcaf. II this Nert MA IT. public. That tnany hearts
would suffer. In apology no writes: II hum
big pray God may ru. {. in tho heart OF her
husband to forgive nlc.' nnd that il quito con-
.i:tent with tha vio'v which he'chcr then tonl Of
his conrse. That metn1tanouul has beeu called
| tito "con!T.ton 1ottor-" 1t bnA
NEVER hi:E* TREATED Ar 4 CoSrEs71oy.
Trac" called u = memorl1.nmof conversations
With 1tccleE. Wifgoson. le1c;lcr. ard ntl,ors my
"aioIogy. =" Aud it il what Illton calls tho
"trua ro'rr." III tho Bacon lutte. it Is also
called the "anlo:v." Apology for A.31lter?,
and ~su!:erv which crat1cd tho I!ushan! and
together, boc.uso this alutcry has bcen met with
| asultAbls apology! In Ais tcpor:, prepared far
the Churcl, Committee. Tton describes il ~ tito
"opologv." md he Hnsl It covered u complicated
more fully INTO. Adultery was not \ complicated
t ttannactlon. but in tha 1lton nrroncouslv boro
Testimony to tho trutu. At tho very time Tilton
rep1e cents llo ind Iioectr III !,'a power. ho was
ttopu:atlons. n,,l ie mnde eooi n4e Of 1t. What
became OF tlat letter nobody knows, Int It's p1r-
roAe wls to mako Dovau PAP rather than ba OK
nosed for having made the1o cl.trges agaIDEs
thsSe CHARGES ~ drawn MP in his Gokbm Aga
sip and all the tcetnlon, here sllnns t:lat
nEEcHEn bid NOT cAuE A ArEAw
about those stumbling Efforts h reTire thesa
41sa;erA The letter to Btccl-1 was in tbs
form Of recital If what Tll.3n stated Dow
CT said and thua mn13 I;escher think l,owou waA
tbs author u the FLANDERS which Bcscllot eayd
had m Foundation. autl which B,wcn says hhI no
foundation. The effort war to mako I3eecher toel
that Bowen was tho malicious contriycr Of tho
downfall at both DcecleE auu Tllton. ind no all
along lie found the purposc to enlist D1echor In
cooperative means to help Tll:on anu in uoim-
adveralon against Roweu aud 10 tl,a purpose
WIS not only to get this money from Bowen. but
Atso to ret Tiltou relnstated III hts position.
Thus Moutton reported to Beeeler how hs shook
his f}st in Eowen's face, uibtsidcd him for his
tfeachery to Bceclcr, and that bowon. ssncing
At l}secher's portrait, ead, How can ever look
that man in the face aysin7" Aul Eeochcr said.
"Why diln't you natl linn On Tho spot aau ret
tho 1noncy 7" to Which aloulton rsnlIed, "Tha
time for that is not como. Tho point IL
TO nE1Ss1ATE T1L-oX.
This, although II 1t was afterwards shovn by
.foulton tho portrait wasn't thero then At all,
aud consequently, Bowen couida't hayo glanced
up nt It.
Deechor aud Ti!ton At Ion'ton's honse IN thu
I'd or It'll Of January. II vps tho one, he sail,
immediately altar the letter Of contsitou. M
thcy call It, and then wens on ~ botweon paech-
eE and 1!sson, under tho conservative guidance
of Sfoultou, tho form Of reconciliation. what
stoultou considered mas suitable and proper be-
treen the gentlemen. Aloultou'a account OF
this fayorB Geecher more than It does Ti1tou.
Tho 1st.er has something to suggest Of soma
confession, but this ia denied by Deocher. and
all tAAt was in it, by iIoalton's account,
Was that Dsecher confirmed alI the
ex.ressious OF sympathy and regret conveyed to
fliton in that memorandum. and TiIton accepted
l5cecller'a cooperation. aua said 80 theu aut
fsunl ti..t tins dowl to tho time when Plymouth
Church. in 1854, attempted to selzo Tllsoa By
| tue throat.
Mr.. EyAr1s SOMEWHAT wEAnE.
1t this pom: a o'clock) Judgs Scilson sus.
ststcd tha: thn Jury should Attend tomorrow
Saturday, but to tAis Eyarss objected. and said
he dcslfcd como res: after Aie hrduuus four days
labor.
SIr, Deacli. who entered the Courtroom st a
lato Aous. stated that tlo hali notlluS to ray
about tho matter. but hs only les.rea to aus hin
lcarned friend how loug hts discourse would
ta5e.
Erarts replied thas ho vould finish en- Tues.
day nezs, And thu Court thsa adjourned till
Monday.