The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1875-04-01

she answered, "No, and thai whoever said so was
a nar.n The lawyers had a short, sharp ignt over
the enort TO Impeach the Carey witness. Judge
Porter explored the legal authorities and hit upon
a paragraph that applied 10 the case closely.
Beach yielded the ground to Porter. and the ques-
ton as 10 Kates veracity was put, and the answer
oil the witness. that she would not believe her IN
very closely as TO how the witness found out the
general character OF this servant
Robert 4. Moore. husband OF the previous wilt
ness, wss next called, but his evidence was uu-
important.
James Redpath then testified chat he knew TIL
ton, Beecher and MOulton; IN 1873 had q CONVEX
satlon with Iiloh about narrative that was
being prepared about Mr.. Beecners aifairs; stayed
all night ut Tlton's; heard the "true storyi
read that night; don't remember any converse
uon particularlyi as lar as ! recollect Theodore
SAID he would tell me all the facts ia the case, aud
he, after thal handed me the paper TO read IN my
room; read the paper; made twenty or thirty
visits 10 the honse during October ana November,
1873 when ne gave me the story 10 read he said
he didn't want Elizabeth to know he nad gwen It
to me. as sne didn't want people to know 1t; one
day being there met Elizabeth; she had an ira-
ordinary expression OF determination; | went
into Theodoreis roo mhe mad a look OF extreme
sorrow; went forward 10 MN ana ne nad the
a controversy with Elizabeth, ana he made a re-
mark OF the extraordinary nerve OF Elizabeth;
sne had told him that II that story was published
would come out and deny 1t; remained with
him a lew minutes and saw that he suffered
greatly, and he staggered as he walked; we
thought he was IN fever or was
going Insane; he was going next day 10 Indiana
lecture, and | said TO some one II he went II
would be the ruin OF him ana mis- family he didn't
go; the next day met Frank Moulton; Tilton
wanted to have the paper published and said,
let me have it;r he said, .'No;" then went
with MN 10 the Golden Age Office; he said, There
II ~ kept1t as long as could TIL saw Frank,
ana then copied the paper; did not copy the
whole oil IL.
Q. Look at that book, Mr. Redpath, and see
whether II Is the same rom which you made the
copyy A. Yes, SIR.
The book offered in evidence.
Witness proceeded 10 say that The trst CONVEX
sation with Ttou occurred at MS house read the
.true storyn after the Woodruff publication, ana
understood that IL was intended TO make the
charge OF Improper proposals.: could not re-
member that Tllton said he had not slept all
nignt, nor did he give any reason for the 'true
story Witness had sent his copy 10 Boston anu
forgot all about lt until he saw Beecher at the
White Mountains, In 1874.
A letter as shown witness, VINO said he wrote
IL TO Mr.. Beecher IN July, 1874.
q. Where hau You seen Mr.. Beecher next after
writing that letter. A. | saw Mr. Beecher next
In Brooklyn; saw him IN July.
U. Was that before Mr.. Beecher made his state
ment before the commltteeY A. Yes, sir.
Judge Neilson-Tnat Is ALL Mr.. Redpath. Call
the next witness.
Mr.. Evarts-We propose put to Mr.. Beecher on
the stand ana that had better be done o-norrow
morning.
The Judge concurred with Mr.. Evarts. and the
court was adjourned till eleven O'CLOCK this morn
Ing.