, 1875-02-13

tne pFlshe6e9 OF member theroof. His yoke
lors vAa challenged, bs Foro they were offered and
in apt time. fet Dr.. Chaae, ~ Presidaut Of th1
Convention, not only decided that they vera cp.
titled to voto for Bishop Of tho lay ssdor, but
nEFuSED TO ENTERTAIN TIE CHALLENGE
knowing that both Of thcm we're strong and A.
tleur supporters of DR.. Ds KoYou in tho Con.
ventiou, and would vote for him; and l,s count
l,'shop Of tho Diocese at Illinois. This was par
tiaan ruling 10 ny opinion. Moro than 1,sOo
yeaIh ago Fontius Pilato asked Of jesus Of NAz-
areth
"wnAr rs 1Ruru7'
am constrainctl to-tlny, in view Of the vto,epe
and intempcsanco OF language employed By yout
correH1,onden:, who rcaorts to 'boy'a piay and {
nnmbskuil,a ,'l aegatnont.' and comes with bott
with broom. Of brush. to pluck mote out Of
Lay'uan'n" cye.-t All constrained, say, K
ssk ta. t rtnet question ., s'siGr to ans*er
feel almost certain tiat i recognize tbs
dn1cat ~ toneaof hisimpcrionn voice. It see@a
70 me that l can aln,oat tho clear OUT
sth naf h'r n '0, Ak Ara Il tue s interest Of
caase was nbt OF tho Dc koyeu 9hrty In tha
Conrsnllon7. Whether he and ltia 1Atty oteyed
tue command Of tie Lord. to tale no thought
What they should nay Of what thoy should DO.
and relied upon tho promise tia: in that day il
should be g,Sun then, What they should Rav and
what thoy Should do2 Whether, Instead. t|lo7
do not lsy out, plan. md prearrange their whola
ii.
Ko7en7 Whether in that programme II was not
predetermined to sustntn tie right Of the "three
clesgyHen TO vole for lishop. as weIl as tho
right of tue two Chance1iors. and that a divided
VOC should b. no vote, some or all of tbcsc
propostIoua: Aud did not DR.. Chaso asa.1n,e o.
a.ti = the rreadenoy OF tho Cony yel!sou pledged
ts,IT1f aac!, Of them?
'5rt,~> "Qno:oG from
~ D., -. LETTER or 1871.
pray L.. '',fn, ITO the hearth Of every
member ot ~ "Ii,t 'itttee to read, and
consent to the consac1ation OF Dir. Do Koven "a
Bishop in the Church, With his euchuri.ticl
alteration, inculcased md encouraged by his
speeches. writings. and toachiuxh, and ritnal ot
poaturc: Thor will sec tha: that pastoral is tho
voice Of the Church; that it condemns Dr.. Do
koyen in adyanco and they will Judge Jim not
fit to bo Bishop Of the Church Of God bacAasa
. ador1ng tho elements themselves" by words,
BY acts, and by posture, and - pfaces himsolf 10
nntagoniam to the doctrine of this Church aud
TIE teaching Of qod,s Word aud puts u peril
mulgated, Dr.. Do koven has rut needed it,
warning voice, nor atated one iot his obnoxious
teachnGn and practices, but, on the contrary. has
intensified them. And hs has nougls, and now
seoks, position where lie eau do 10 with creator
power.
There were Afty.eighs legal and constitutional
lay votes cast on that last ballot. 1t required
thirty to eiost. By tho ruling Of tho President
excluding tho divided vote from The count, he re-
luced the number sequi: Cd to elect to 20. hara
demonstrated the euncon*titutlonaity OF this rule.
Dr. DO koven Is not Legally or coEattutionatly
~" ia ~ az ~ Lnu ~. ,un 's ateHas
how strong tho opposition to him is, with both
clesey ana laty, he Will never accept ,hs Illegal
call. QJuRrM
..,.-., ,.
OE kOV1NS End SEYMCUH'5 VIEWS.
ARTICLE Ey TIE REv, DR.. ruI.Ios, oF MOBILE.
To the Editor Of Tie CkIt1up I11tHhe:
CHICAGO, Fob. 11-ln tho Church Reri<,u for
Jxnn,rv JH75 nb,rt hes mat u,,,c ;ta ,,nr,r.,.~
III, - ~, -. 49,, ~ Fs1'""se
rs au ss''c'o 1'u'" ~ r"'so'' ~ Moo'le' enat!ea
terestnS, just At this juucture to Episcoraisns
generally, aud especially to those in tha Diocese
" I'uo4n 10 nv .o's " s''o s"s
gont!cmen "aom 1n's i'loceHe nas 80 recently
elected to 'ts Episcorate' TO the FoFr lmpartsns
subject of Eucharstic Alteration" It will bs
.1,,t n. F,,,nr an ,c,troxIai,v,1 f,3end NJ n,
,.'". - u.su''' al' .s..e 90 I'' -. -.
De hoVon also draws strong contrast between
the yleNs Of Prof. Seymour and DR.. De kosen
m tit. subicct dcclaripg that he has. by author.
~ c.',..,s,,. ~ =, -. h.,,.1s ~a..,a
4.s 4o.+ Hs'4'oa' ~ a. s rs ~ 'opa4r
aleu- tne '1e"s "o'""eo" ~ ~ 10 ao'en ~
this subject, more particularly tho famous Ben
0I nrl Fnton nlso Avs tint i,r De Koyon has. d,
~. u,sun @.1o 1 ~ 19s s" !ro,t;'n - ID
nlS sl'ecc'i III tnc ooeia. .e ~ 20 !"sa,
anu N esheF siate1nettst chSent1'y tnooinoa ~
expressions, aud, rerllapH. bis vloRa on thus
! subject, 30 as to approach nearer to what Dr..
| Fultou regards an orthodoxy. Yet oyeu with
| III. favornhc intirmcnt Tar Tulton does pnt
s.,1 s.,iv Jnraa ~ 1;e Envcn ehonrh ys II var,
,utt ~ nto1ee - 49, - =. ,; - hn+i 80. - A.
AoiE'a ~ IL 'e*n-0 - t'!tI ~ .oPtt' 70 - -
clare, - Therefore WILL venture tl'e ptetheton
| that, II he will re-examlno hlH whole position,
he will be found III less than tLTet
veera mara to abandon tia Usnnctt formula H.
1910.
'oEesae.. ''t ~ r.,,.a .,,r.s .,.. bafor. .,r;1-
"Aetner Ut; tnuon sniIks .ua' o''T.e rs o, @
| Ing at this happy concl'!slol VI. Ire ho9on
should be consecra:ed aa bishop. does not ap-
pear from anything stated III lts very interesting
| ssrtic,e
"Ai ,a, ,o H.. ob.o,v.d th,t - ruchnri,.tn
.,; " asso :, ,''u =, I'm i"ct r,rns ~ vh,r
1n.to1 ~" . -. ss.s1S .'.5 ,,nr ~, ,r,n,nd
of Which Ills election and consecsaLiou al bishop
| Of Illinois In opposed This il only ono, though
| nromiuen,. noint in tho Rit;sl1s,ic and no-
= p plo.'ns, . po" ,;th ,"i;,t r. ia Rowan in
manlzl4B syhtoni "ltn "rsu - p."ar. fnr t,.n -