, 1875-05-05

We do not dcair8 10 Ahy anything npon the bul'-
Ihc Conrt--You desire to mike no opposition
10 tilo n,otion now male by Jndse Lawret:o?
,ln,lgo Dickcy--1 ito not ui,deratand him 10
mako q mnsinn.
nav nrttas defendant without prejudice 10 tic
injunction. and IN iiIo supplemental blu.
Judgn Dlokav--oh no, eif.
MI. .ronee-,r!lon wy nls II (:he snpplo.
martat bill setting out tlsa action Of tho coun-
1udge Dickey-We do mt d.nre 10 my anr-
Thing on tl'at snbject; tAtte;r brief eonal,ltn,
T,lo gcttlcmon suggcst thAt this action, OF
c0nree Ia
str 70 lie covarnuEp Az u1vrso ANT CONSENT.
taking for granted TINT TINT bo 40. We hnso
not Hcon thon,, And do not know, esospt tn 10
far Al Your Honor III informed by Judge Law
roncot tito character Of tho amandmeDte, OF tho
coniontH Of tho PAPER. I i,hvo taken for grant
od that the proceeding titus far wa. eH.patto.
Tho Court-Iot tho amendment ho filed ssilti"
out projullce to The Injunction tl,cn. and tho
Huorlc,nonta1 bill be fled also, Now, do you do
site to nreuo tho ulutlo1i for continuance OF tho
injnhc,ions
Judre Lnwrcncc-1f your Honor desires to
1,nat arguments from uR, We arc rcafiy. W1 sup.
Vst TINT S0ur Honor l!aB already decided that,
by the original bill, ws made
A rniMA-FActE cIsK
for the Injunction. Aa Your Honor asktd. un+
lltatl upon tInt question. We BnrpuAe that tho
continuance Of Tint ordor would 10 matter OF
coutEc. VIC now ask, however, further ln}nnc-
tion agninHs tho Guy Of Chicago itself, WHICH
for tlls purpose Of enabling Your LIQUOR to SEQ
upon wlins THO application, III base. and The pre-.
ciso character Of tho injunction which ws see.
it probably, would he vol to road tho supplo-
judge Diokey-rf tbs Court PLEASE. wp lnte
not ARl hu opportunity to aeo tho amcnllnohts
or tho supplemental bill. Al application tB
made not oniy 10 coltInno tho original injunc-
Of Chicago, anil It iB perfectly reasonable that
wo should Do allowed to examine iuto thcm. Wo
may desire to traverse non,o OF tho allegations,
nnd wo must Iayo soma time to prepare. Wo
had no nutfco OF tho now INJUNCTION until this
inorulng, and therefore ask tlat no fnrthor
| action bs taken unit! the 1neotlug Of thu Court
tomorrow morning, Ill order that wo may acL ad-
| vlsedly. lux.
Tie Court understand The motion to divsdo
itsolf into two parts. Frnt, tile motion for tho
continuance Of the injunction OF wilinh tho city
| laA Lad no:fcn, ~ I understand, and which Il
soema to mo ought TO bo taken up. .
snco tlast t.mo. Wo camo this morning oxpocs-
| 7i,E MOTION TO CONTINUE THE INJUNCTION
or tho bill M It bad boon presented and that 10
lad examined Now. they propose To atnond It,
and wo have had no opportunity to o1auins tue
! now status In which it is placed.
Tho Court-'Tl.o only change, however, Ia 10
tito parties. Il III cohtoldsl on lilo part of tho
citys co,naei that tlero il no cans shown at all
| for M Injunction. II there is mol Of course 1t
is very easy 10 diapoRo Of. and SEQ no reason
| for delay. II counsel desire 10 have further
tins to examine tlo supplemental bill. It may be
ominouttY proper That 1t ahonfd DO Erauted
| Aaiouru,noi,ta nse n very great Inconvenience TO
| mo they interfere with tho businosB Of tlo
court; and do mol think tloy ought to 10 at-
loved whcro counuel hays lad reasonable no
I iicc. ..........
atmuch as tho subject :-matter run Into each
| other md depend very much upon tbs satno
| questions, TINT they should bo
| plsuCssKD TOGETHER,
| and the w!1ofo nlattcr be disposed of By aancle
order? It sccrnh to sne it would DO Improbable
| and great rasto of time, mud cAusa Eroat eul-
barrasa,nont TO the buaness OF tho Court to occu.
! ny tits Afternoon in discussing ono branch Of
thn matter, and to-morto" morn!ng in dHcuss-
lug the other.
Judge Lawrenoe-I deaire II tho Court please,
| to make
| SINGLE SUGGESTION
Which is decisive IN to leaving tho mattor where
the old Injunction until ths further order Of tho
Court. /. IL this. Tho supplemental bill
~ now filed, and it shows upon
its faco deliberate violation, Of tho
Honor a. a former day. Tic members OF tho
! City Council have dono precisely what they wora
forbidden to DO, opnnty nvow,ng their intentior-
| NJ dispbedonce Of Your HoluG'a writ, aud Of the
State. 1t is In my Judgment o"o OF the most
rLvuNAsr, uNJuar1F1ADLE, AND OUTRAGEOUS
VIOLATIONS
Of ths authority and dignity Of Court Tint ]
i,avo over known TO occur and, while these gon'
t!amen Chs Aldasmcn} aro thus In contempt, &c
fnr aH now appenrs, NO shall protest against
their baIng permitted to open tier mouths In
this Court On tho question Of the continuance oi
that injunction. It il recognized rule Of chan
under an injunction shal not ba permit
ted to npPcar In Court until he hRt
purgcd his contempt; and while those gentlo
men {couusoD assume the attitude which thol
hare ataumcd, think proper to bid aeiianee t
Your Honor and Your 11onor's Court, and tht
authority of the la 1T docs not become them X
cumo hero and ask to 10 hoard OIL tho question
whether an order which they hold is no order d
sil bllaIt bs continued. Wo now ask, wtllou
tn1ther argnmcnt upon TINT. question. that th'
iniunction bo ordered to stand until tho fusthe
o,aar OF this Court. What Your Honor ma!
think propor 70 do In reference to tho Applca
tiou for 4 fnrthar Injunction against tho CITY,
whatever order Your Honor may deem proper Il
| make In roBpcct to the hearing OF that, ~
submit to,-~Whether Or not tho gentlemen shouls
10 permitted 10 be hoard on that ~ counacl TO
the city alone, Independent Of being counsel To-
the Aldermen.
Judge Diokey-I trust this matter will bs rro
cosdod with without unboconltng haAte, will
elaboration, and certainly withou. fecllng.
havc none. Tho gentleman (Judge Lawrence
aboms to nlhnifoBt some OH tho subject. hay
10 doubt, wlou wo como to explore the mktor
It will DO seon that Ills il not y cass for tht
feeling or sovore s.rictarcs which my lcarnos
frit nd seos TT 70 make upon us without glvtnl
W Au opportunity to ba hoard.
Judge 1awrenro-l desire simply to ray tha
tl,ors IL m explicit order Of this Court whiel
las bean
DEfInERATELy DIsonEYHD.
That plAcoB tho parties In contempt, II you
. 1Iqnnr had Jurisdiction over this subject matte
aud tho persons It the time thla ortsr WA made
. Yha Court-Tlls dllllouity which rec tn re
gard to that iB this. hayo noolica iu Formation
. that the writ has been lisoboyed. Iknow b
gonosai reputation. ~ other gentiomon koov
l lint 1t has, but, at prcsont, hsvo no atdAvi
OF paper beforo mo which allows that it Las bee,
disobeycd.
MIR. rcnco--Tho supplemental bill, Which
swofn to. now on tho tecurls OF this Court
sl.ows tllat 1t las been deliberately flsobeycd.
j. judge Mckoy-Ws have not had an oppo1
. | tut,fty to bee 1t,