New-York tribune., 1875-02-02
IG, Tv-0y'S LETTER OF RrWCR.E TO HI
MOTHER EXCLUDED

IG, TT-0y'S LETTER OF RrVoR.E TO uEB
MOTHER EXCLUDED.
o Stare whether the letter which it was pro-
- -ei should q reply Mrs Morse prepared al
tst uuef g. letter prep red by Mr. Beecher in reply
s., s, and have seen the mao1crp, Of it It is in evidence
t a1 -ly-I cannot absolutely sNeaI-ta he wrote the
-v0r M .pot: 5ut very distinct in my recollection Of
23l. namely ,ha; tie spHi and Tie substance oi Tat
ry agreed upon a, TIA; interview whether TIC actual
c.e Of t5e rpi. was then made have forgotten
q Look s "Exhti, g." and whether that is The letter
g. g4a you rtsr? a L ls is correctly printed il Is Tie one
o. which Iref-r
@ Do yol reco1t IN n- ING else that occurred thar inter
vy' A y Sly during tta, interview took ont from ny
Sc sHI lib,ed letter which Mrs Morse hsd addressed
l. ~ Bowen 8, was little iae anonymous letter she
e.. sent D Tf Eroot, Ca9n and which young gentleman
rane-ed with tha. pape, had sent 10 NE do not know
"lshcr . evidence the substance Of il Is this
Yoa need state what t unless YOU read 10 there
Ial -e2d instance of the peculiar Kind Of cor
y-pJnlelc. 20 which she was addicted
P that and whether there anything else
? . interview which you rcnem0e- a Nothing occuTs 10
.l, '.ue
q THE letter which have shown you which you say
ferea a4, interview in whose hands did you Gls IL! =.
a !, +, Elz4a a;h' + hand.
@ that. IL hand- did yo1
IN, in Mr. Mou.tons or Nj Beecaer's' a cannot say;
fH0 letters there t letter and letter dated
and my recollection is that two
o;aer- ,an Mr. Morse had written bat vii not be positive
g. that
Was ANYTHING SAID bv Mr Beecler iu regard anv parts
o. this letter. s. II you hand the letter moment, viii
e0!eayot refresh my mind.
Q Look over il and SEE banding the letter. A lie asked
e understood to be the state u Ezaoeths mind and
hart how M Bore her burden; whether not she could
ye unde e weight Of calamity that had fallen upon her
re asked me some very ympah ng questions, Sir about
H.. 'b.n, perhaps they bad better pe omitted.
Mr. F..eou-If Jour Honor please, VIC offer that letter In
evidence
Nj Eyarts-I am a los to on whs; ground II your
Honor please - letter from Mrs. Tt0n 20 Mr. horse-
between trI partes-and how u evidence DO under
Snt They given conversation concerning state
su,n. To u aai A there s such st-tement In 10. Is
assumed that IS something there which introduces the
ss OF M THton having Nj Beecher preached
g. forty sunday and the witness has
Icdd about We remember the Identical eTrcs
n Ou, said something % That spirit during the summer
aud rc.ri 70 that the conversation Is legitimate but the
a. that here presented that suggested topic Of
Conversation certainly does not give them the right to read
aons letter other parties The letter was not the sub
Sect Of -rs-n but This matter whether Mr. TtOn had said
lat be pr -caed % forty of Es messes was the subject
-rrder discussion fact t mere j. letter "hch was
Baked about certainly give them he right 20 read H.
Nj Beach- offered the same ground upon which We
r- oil 1e pspers produced ~ evidence that they were
r1ugh 10 the attention and observation Of Mr. Beechef and
y-rcre known 20 m NJ Tou was sent for and found Mr.
feeoher and Mr Mouiton consultation over this letter and
'hers an. particular passage referring particularly 10 Nj
.o, he made that statement Bat the whSc letter was before
All Moaon anu MI BoocLer before Mr. Tlion was Called TO
4l.c conference
Nj Eysrs-How does that give yoa the rgh; 70 pax t IN
evidence
Mr. Beach How does give the right We find he let
a., in the possession Of Nj Beecher 4nd under be ob'a
Lon
M Pvsrts-suppOse here ia our haEds-@s A2 coln
asi bayipg been IN his hands fOr six months.
NJ, BescbThat would be privileged communicated be-
tween counsel and client
N, E,art.-f this yery letter had been IN Mr. Beecher
land, for six months and put into our bands AZ counsel
would ta give you right 10 read letter between 'nia per
sons because one party suit has got II III hls AAhds
Nj Beach-Certany II the subject OF oohSu'1 oN
.,ee, Mr. Bcher and Others and the reply 70 be mace "a
then Wa ANYTHING In the letter which relates 70 e slo
3 os liasop or this officially between the parties II Is com
IEetent 49,.
Mr. Yyarts-Ny learned friend is Ia confusion Tbs lei'e
was not the subject Of consultation IL was the ohef Ie'.ei
which made the reply.
Mr. beach, am not in confusion Ths letter was present.
and the habits Of Mrs Morse and the necessity of making some
gepy and the subject matter Of this letter were subjects o con
saltation. ~ between Mr Beecher and the others.
Jadge NesonThs letter Of ME- Morse aud TIE Tepy aI'
both Ia.
Mr. beach, know that
M Esarts-Bu that a letter 20 NJ Beecher
Mr. Besch-It was What mAlterf IL Letter h'tof'