The New Orleans bulletin. [volume] (New Orleans [La.]) 1874-1876, 1875-12-22
THE COUNTS.
United States Circuit COurt.


The Grand Jury being this day called
twenty-three members answered, and they re-
tired to their room.
Resale Maenhaut vs.. city of New Orleans.
1t was ordered that an injunction issue to the
city of New Orleans and to the Administra
tors, and to said Louisiana National Bank
eDjoining and restraining them and each Of
them from paying out for any purpose what
soever, SO much of the funds collected &C.
cording to the terms of ordinance No. -,
approved July IA, 1875, so raised and dis
posed as aforesaid, as may be necessary for
the payment of interest coupons on said con-
solidated loan, the holders of which have not
consented to the terms of said city ordinance.
Ii was also ordered that the motion for the
appointment of receiver be continued, with
privilege to the plaintiffs to renew the same
IN the event of containing default.
United States vs. Lawrence Dunn-Indict-
ment for assault upon letter carrier The
Grand Jury failed to find a true bill.
Lehman u Co. vs.. f. Henke.-Jury in
structed to return sealed verdict in case of
agreement.
Superior Criminal Court.
ARRAIGNED.
Castor Larche, charged with rape; pleaded
not guilty.
Paul Brown, charged with assault and bat
terry; pleaded not guilty.
Lawrence Williams, charged with burglary,
armed with dangerous weapon; pleaded not
guilty.
Mary Estelle, charged with murder.-It ap
pears that this is one of the cases in which
the judgment was reversed by the Supreme
Court, on the ground that the Grand Jury
which found the indictment was not legal
Grand Jury. Mr.. Castellanos, counsel for the
accused, stated that the prisoner declined to
plead to the Indictment, and, through her
wished to enter tie "Antrefois con-
Wet, because the accused has already been in
jeopardy for the same offense having been
indicted, arraigned and tried, and a verdict of
guilty rendered without capital punishment
Mr. Castellanos stated to the Court that
the record of the action of the Supreme
Court has not yet been filed in the Superior
Criminal Court, consequently the Court has
40 knowledge of the fact that the former con-
7Iclon, judgment and sentence has been set
aside and the prisoner remanded. And I'M
ess the record is produced before the plea is
entered, the indictment must be quashed.
The Court took the matter under advise
nent
CONTINUED.
State vs.. Michael Delany-C Charged with
tabbing with dangerous weapon with intent
o kill. Indefinitely.
State vs.tP. J. Sullivan-C Charged with as
ault and battery. Indefinitely
State vs. Kitty Mccoy, alias Donald =
Charged with shooting with dangerous
Weapon with intent to kill. Indefinitely.
vERDICTs.
State VS.. James Duffy-Charged with car
ying concealed weapons. Guilty.
State VS.. Robt. Mahon- Charged with car
ylng concealed weapons. Guilty. Recon-
nended to the mercy of the court.
MOTION.
State VS.. Joe Alexander, convicted of an |
tempt to commit rape.-J. Fl. Ferguson,
So, counsel for the accused, filed a motion
n arrest of judgment, on the following
rounds: That the verdict rendered in this
ase-to wit: an attempt to commit rape-can
ot form the basis of a valid Judgment; Sec
nd that the jury rendered verdict of an
tempt to commit rape. Said offense is one
yer which this court has no jurisdiction,
onsequently the Court would be unable to
ronounce final judgment against the
ccusad