The New Orleans bulletin. [volume] (New Orleans [La.]) 1874-1876, 1875-05-18
THE COURTS.

1 4nN OOO 0A0s
! There is no Disgusting the fact that litiganta
are dropping off and the business of thu
: courts simmering down to almost concen
trated solution Of nothingness The judges
are clearing off their dockets and making pre-
partitions for the approaching leisure of vaca
tion. "Nothihg new to-day" greets the re-
porter in every court, and in utter despera
ton he fees them for some more prolific
news-pasture.
Supreme Court.
This tribunal was engaged yesterday in
reading opinions, and as the number is very
large, the day will possibly be consumed
without the transaction of other business.
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED.
Mrs. D. A. Taylor and Husband VS.. Sheriff
of Carroll parish.
John 8. Collins Vs. w. P. Harper ct ais.
| s. Hermann VS.. John Marks and L. B.
Cain.
City of New Orleans VS.. Peoples Insurance
Company.
James T. jackson w. VIM. Durbridge.
| Quinlan Bros. & Co. vs.. J. II. Wood and ].
B. Chandler.
Geo. d. Pritchett Va. Mechanics and Ira
ders' Insurance Company, Mrs. S. G. Lane,
intervenor.
Nicholson & Co. vs.. Citizens Bank.
City of New Orleans VS.. Germania Insur-
ance Company.
State Va. Jacob Morris.
A. Hennen, Mrs. A. NJ. Hennen, executrix,
| ct al. vs.. Forget Guillotte ct ais.
Doughty vs.. Sheriff of East Feliciana
State VS.. Fritz.
Louisiana Savings Bank vs.. Bussey.
City vs.. Peoples Insurance Company.
JUDGMENTS REVERSED.
Frank F. Case, Receiver, VS.. 81. V. Klop-
penburg ct ais.
Duncan N. Hennen vs.. New Orleans and
Carrollton Railroad.
Peter Marley vs. 7. F. Kendall and G. W.
Kendall.
F. s. Servill VS.. City of New Orleans.
Moore Janney & Hyams vs.. l.. Lalawrie.
Company and Pelican Mutual Insurance
Company.
N. Burton ct ais. VS.. Chas. Hicks ct ais.
TIP. Leathers vs. John w. Cannon and
Jesse K. Bell.
Edward Nalle VS.. F. NJ Grant.
State ex rel P. S. Witt, agent. vs. Charles
Clinton, Auditor. Warrant ordered to be
issued.
Succession of Joseph Ricard.
Succession of John O'Loghlen.
Carter Cogreve VS.. John P. Fowler.
IT, Grun6trOm We. L. Z0ellor.
N. o. Canal and Banking Company vs.. the
City of New Orleans.
James H. Lynch VS.. Mrs. Ellen Kennedy.
A. Langsdorff VS.. s. LeGardeur.
City of New Orleans vs.. City Hotel, r. S.
Morse and James E. Zuntz.
Benito Virras VS.. Merchants Mutual In
surance Company.
Smith & McKenna VS.. Edwin Charles.
State ex rel. Hays VS.. The City of New Or
leans.
Lemane VS.. Lemane.
MOTIONS TO DISMISS GRANTED.
j. Rodriguez and w. w. Handlin vs.. Carlos
Pie.
G. B. Lawrence ct al. Vs. Mrs. Mary Law
renee, alias Shutterly.
MOTIONS TO DISMISS ovERRULED.
Randell Hunt vs. Jas. E. cunts.
M. Musson q Co. VS.. A. Foster Elliott.
Where vs. Fleitas.
United States Circuit Court.
The attendance was slim in Judge Woods's
court Monday morning, the interest having
tagged since the ending of the Bayly & Pond
case There was on trial some internal rev.
enue cases before q jury.
Superior District Court.
A number of private butchers have filed
their bonds and taken their appeal from the
judgment of Judge Hawkins in favor of the
city of New Orleans, enjoining them from
vending meats.
In the case of Richardson VS.. the Board of
Audit, the exception made by the defense,
that plaintiffs petition sets forth no cause of
action, came up for trial. Plaintiff alleged
that he was the joint owner and representa-
tive of SIS. 900 in claim against the State,
which claim he filed with the Board of Audit
for adjudication.
That afterwards this claim was audited and
allowed, and this action subsequently revoked,
the board substituting other claims for it, and
he prayed for an injunction commanding and
enjoining the board from warranting other
claims in violation of petitioners rights.
These allegations the defense says are not
sufficient
The rule to set aside the Injunction was
taken up, Alfred Shaw, Esq, for the board,
H. Z. Dibble, ESQ.,, for Richardson, and was
going on when this report closed.