, 1875-05-06

defendants state that they hsve tno~lst7+ lntor-
snalon belief tn tho nnnicr Of rntea that
ca, The C1ngresaona'a and staso and county
tic numSer 81 voss. then cat compared VIII
liz number east pretended 10 b cs,t At bs mne
Ill., e.rs int ths ur o - roe. aeeu,y
cast In the First, Second, Serontht sna Eleventh
Wards IN the I'D ais. dnt not .<cesh nnethfI part
Of E.ection snd deny that any votes not actually tant
IN tsid warha wtFn. counted and returned W the
lItit ai,,h. Tenth rwsl''h, T1.1te:n.h sevenssna
cs.i It ths si.cion Of Isss Ne,embar er.
eeri y In short ., til. m,rnl,er II vo,t.
eaas a n election Of hl14l t:tt Tho ae.end'nts II
cnmmos, cnnnelI hut 1rsya tn cor1lanants to prova
what suhory Tue Judge, had H. reHa.h 70 ~ ar,ons.
frtaa appropriation made by Tho Council to ray
for s ,er.ee. Of ths cerks Of election. for tho rea*o
s.1nsnt 10 tns passaK, II Tue san aa aprraprst!on bill
n The city, but aver that the Apt.aratoa could ,e
Legally 'a. .i'er ths s.stn t3r t.. PURPOSE ~
nssn fSus h'ts fnd. ' and TX Z s no, H. :s
Jon. Il ~ Ths sitndsn.s w .s as e.,stia r1s " q ~ osTu
&c Forrest have to knovledts lntortnatton or bs.
aasss a Of eiset"n M shst 'a ao .rpro.n ] a Len
m.a with which 10 pay for thair services, snd that
they mt nee,ary fos tho election, md .ie sid
Forrrst denls that hu informed or lna!suc:ei Tho
Judges Of election. The d.fsndants teny thar any
II ihe Judges Ct e'eesion refused to .plo!nt clark, r
hut iu.ist that ii |. ins1na:eral whether sleJ
dill 80 or not .snd that t]irir ,ne"tsct or
rso.. TO 90 '9 eo1a nos .ei IT, v.dy o. tns
1nsely necessary It zach Of the p'Iin9-f'ascs, .s
slisacd In tbs blu, and shst 10th pforo.tans-Aa 10
resenta.ion-cuuia not bo tgally submitted At the
sans election without two ballnt-bo1ea, nor without
two llboota In Which to enter ths na1les nunheEs,
ant3 nldeH6 FAsi1r1rf E$ yUffbs Ill
balInt-bo1 delivered - the Judge. of se :io.
I'D ~ IT,. sas 1 s .4 a,.a " Il" i x s Fsui III.
ure To delisst NITRO than QUO tnrh lo1 would
not .Gect the validity q he e!ect!oss; dsfcalan'
les!ed Aad refused to deliver any po.Looss to tho
Judges Of election, alleged n the tpr!en :nal b
a: 'or r 81 1ns " sna eI ss
tjon % he held on 4iri 2, lass, aud that they in
s4s4 t.at tbs qas,ao9 .; sa1ao5y t2a
lost. kspt. !. required v lay; : hat u.
the Council in conrassntton II expressed statutes
the subject AID that sho returns to Ia n.aIa
sA 1ns 1ni ~ n1! ~ s .s fe,sea'. m Of IT,
which pasald ths Council April a.; and was sulse-
queu'I, seeon,ia,r.1. ana a,.eft st;. whether tho
vaeI that the paasaRs uf tLe a,# was Il! violation Of
tia injunction ts i,nnaseEis They Aimit that ELsA
ersd n ths conuctl It had no. c4sa.'el tbo returns
Of tbs elsetion, tut Ely ihas thu returus
Ut tue election wsrs hefors tls,ll. in the sndA Of
the City Clerk the tim; tlty leil that ali th.
bers o. tie coluc.i knew ct The farss detailed In tic
bill Of tomll lutns and n the amenat,eun thereto.
which not ,nals nutN Atterths actton had,
sid that they ks~ that Abs esction ~ The words Of
the said eil If complaint Wa issA for ths reasons
alleged In the b, tia. tho returns of tho judges
were t.gsl alleged In tho bill! They deuy thlt the
Common Council and CITY clork are eousf'rinK To-
gsshrr to !acArs Tue election he'd April - to haxs
Leen In favor Ut the org4n-4uan Of tho city
utAer the Gensral iaw, anl that. sny ct
them hass d ,ls any art n reg.rl' 10 the r,t..7n
el to do by Law, md required Of thtm W the!t
uf o;ce The defend admit IN th"lE ansNtr
that, 1t regntar meeting IT slle Common cunc aed
OF the e,econ and 10 disclose hs Tuts Of the eectors
anil ihst they driared that tue vuta was III favor Of
adopting s1u General law of iss3 II lha charter o1
ordered tho result to Va pread upon fae zscords OF sht
, city, aud declared the vote on tho 4uossthn ol
minority representation to have been ssainaa
",oy4 votes, md ordered said result tr sie III urot
he rs.ordl, and that IA provided IN and " s:
Ut Art. of sAd act that ths Jnd3eo Of electint
heid upon tho question of incorporation unlee n
act elali make rcuras Of such eecton to tue Cit,
Council, wlose duties II ehal! be 10 cauyass such re
turns. aud the result Of suca canvass 70 Be en-
eauvasang ths aud declaring The rasuits there
Of aud casins the to he s}relA upon tbs socotl
tic Council, were ouly complying with the mandate
vars performing ~ OH i'll aet ~ the coa,tuo.
! Council Of tho City Of Chicago. Thu defendants I'D
init aud Insist that tic Court lad no jdrtAdIcsiun
issus the writ Of Injunction hs3fI upon the crigIut
iii. snd that the Injunction 10 tssica Il abto'u,e1
null ani vod; that tho Court had n6 1nrIsdictio1 Il
entertain s orgua! blu fled In the cAuse or to ssu
Ss ana pr'! ney
.hs rams by way Of pisa. Tho AnIwer Of detend1nt
coses with deual of I'll lnannee Of con'pirary au
fraudulent aets. md ~ ether m.;ts1n M and th,ns Y.
aaE 10 b. dilMikesl4