The Leavenworth weekly times. [volume] (Leavenworth, Kan.) 1870-1880, 1875-07-08
THE DISTRICT COURT.
What Business was Transacted
There July 9Th and 9th.
A Great Multitude of Cases Dis
posed of By the Judges.
The following are the cases disposed OF at
this court July 9Th and 9th:

The following are the cases disposed OF al
this court July 9TH and 9th:
MONDAY, JULY 9TH.
Houston vs. Osborn ct al, answer Of de.
PENDANT, T. o. Osborn, Withdrawn, default
taken as to all defendants judgment for
SO, 1000; sale OF shares Of stock ordered.
Castle vs. Houston, motion for new trial
argued and held under advisement.
BEFORE JUDGE LECoNPTE-
Ide VS.. Leavenworth City, default and
judgment against city, as defendant, 81 $50,
and interest at ten per cent; bonds and scrip
filed and cancelled.
BEFORE JUDGE IDE.
Leayen worth Savings Bank vs.. Huddles-
ton ct al motion 10 confirm sale oyerruled
and accepted to, and motion for orier to
complete purchase or pay costs OF further
proceedings oyerruled; motion for new
appraisement sustained Kuhn vs..
Keeling, motion Tor new trial overruled,
judgment ON We rdict on payment OF jury
fees, ninety days given defendant to make a
case for The Supreme Court. Woods VS..
Lobenstien, motion for new trial over
ruled, judgment on verdict on payment OF
Jury fees; sixty days given TO make case
for the Supreme Court. Massman W.. Cas-
sella, motion to revive Withdrawn. .. Burgess
VS.. Shannon ct al, leave given defendants
10 detach exhibits to answers TO be attached
10 amended answer; motion OF defendant
Wheat to make new party defendant over
ruled; answer filed and plaintiff
ruled TO apply in twenty days.
Foell vs.. Bremen ct al, motion to set aside,
judgment argued and oyerruled, and thirty
days given 10 make case for the Supreme
Court Second National Bank vs.. Davis ct
al, motion OF defendant Stewart, admins
tratriH, 10 retax and apportion-cOsts called,
and motion referred TO J. II. Fitzpatrick, To
report all questions Of fact and law arising
Hereunder - kuhn VS.. Keeling, motion Of
G.. 4. Eddy for order on defendant TO pay
money into court, defendant objects to hear
ing OF motion and objection oyerruled re-
ierred to +. Stillings.. Metropolitan Build
ing and Loan Association VS.. McGonigle,
motion TO confirm sale, sustained
and deed ordered. .. Lelean, sdminis-
tratrix, vs. HiSinbotham, motion for new
appraisement sustained, and new appraise-
ment ordered. State Insurance Co., OF Mis-
souri,, VS.. Darling; motion for a new APP
praisement sustained and new appraise-
men; ordered. Order for fifteen petit jurors
to serve at the next term OF court.
TUESDAY, JULY 9TH.
Hopkins, a. Warden, VS.. X. p. T. K. Co.,
plaintiff dismissed, action without preju-
dice, and case dismissed AZ plaintiffs cost
Reynolds vs.. Chapman, on application
sixty days given the defendant TO
make case Tor the Supreme Court.
Tucker ct al VS.. Medley, leave given plain
tiff to file an amended petition in ten days,
defendant to answer in thirty DAYS, and
plaintiff to reply in forty days....Scott ct al
VS.. Foote ct al, defendant Burr presents
petition, affidavit and bond for removal
OF case 10 L. S. Circuit Court court de
clines TO hear the same, and for reasons al
ready stated, and OF record in the case.
Jones vs. McMurtry, this was case where
petition was filed and summons and writ
OF attachment were issued, at 10, A. NJ, Nav
26, 70 the plaintiff being nonresident of
the State, and the suit being brought by his
agent or attorney, il afterwards appeared
that the plaintiff died at noon OF the same
day on which the writs were issued, and
that the wits were delivered to the Sheriff
at III O'Clock on the said day, and were
served at . p NJ OF the same day. The ad-
ministrator of the plaintiff subsequently
filed petition in the case by leave Of court
With himself as plaintiff, and with an en-
dorsement made by defendants attorney,
waving service OF summons, and entering
his appearance. The defendant moved TO
strike said petition from the files and abatet
the action, which motions were by the court
sustained, and thirty days given the defen-
dant TO file his petition in error in the SUI
preme Court, during which time the attach
ment is TO remain in force.