The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1875-11-18
THE NEWJURi LAWTESTED
THE sECoFD DAY 1SD Only sRTES
JURORS THP4AELLED.
TIE Humorous BeeinHIas 81 Trial that
will be very mach w Errpest- 1oth sides
Ioolling fer q Jnry with brains.


The four Jurors accepted for the Scan
nell trsl on Taesday enta cd the over and Ter
n irer M room yesterday. af:er the nr ni.ht
Of thfr confinement, ~ inly disrie i.ed Win
the III ,urA that bsd b. "a len them. The slos
rrocess u ding the jury box was resumed.
The sndeavor Of both prosecution and defence
seemed TO be to secure intelllseut jurors, and
men who BETRAYED ignorance were excused BY
mutual consent. TITS policy tended to retar1
progress, AZ the Kind OF men wanted we're 80 the
main settled In their opinions. 4 few aprarent-
IL good Jurors were challenged bg the defence
Tor unc explained reasons, but fahness and RI en-
tai capa,ity we're 10 most Instances the only re-
oulrements insisted upon. Sesnnell Joined IN
consultations wi,h his la.vysrs, and his choice
was rega ri ~ them. He was sgain accOmpa-
nied Nv Ma wife nd several friends.
IL was noon when J0ln :. Nell vas accepted
so ias hs iSsst n ses atgr o. time 9,
the hon icide ana tue lrst trial ne DID not live
In tins div and read VERY hiiie uuon toe subj CT
Edw. ri kaepel sac 81 an preiudieed tn
STR 10 The scanned party be,osened aroused
Interest.
ssii hr. Reach.
Upon Als personal appearance"
JupGfNo At YIRsr sIGHr.
! "Had YOU ever seen bin before this morning."
40 but usually judge ot men 1t art sight
! AMI NV im pFsss i.ns are very trfn.
]
! H. from the favorable personal aupeartn - Of
/ Mr. :. fnneii would trat rrejudics aiect you
/ M DE- ling upon a verdict"
"I.7ink Il volld. II would require s.rore
/ evidence t0,pvercome ny prepVssessl mi ~ r
/ 81 the man
! Iuere-f er f.r anott er traarv hour Juror a'ter
] firnr WIS II l~i.ef. A. length. Judge an tfw-
] YER having secome wrsry aud DISCOURAGED.
Prcd srirk p plugltss. Oh lrcn street. Dr. GOODS
dealer. testified ia t hal eKursssd AZ n-nion
/ b. areCsat discu-siUn y he case. Further les-
/ uoninc showed to-s tn!s e"nyersai'e n y a. ~itsr
- 49, I'D lIndGr
/ rett ord red rim % appe-r Ia court this mora
/ in- e punishment.
/ diFertiuc. lie J. Rtoy ~ 3ser. and Two weeks 4
conduru snt as q lurlr vl4ll be -rs Damage
% ne hc'd'v business. lie said inst be NJ
I formed al ooinion, olt c'cse iutcrr'. a1ion
sho4eI that lie scncmoeret ht'.e about tue
/ foui- &C.. AMI VS. se ID vitlQ1 n shadow ID
p" Bat ,of,dn. ~ tho c.se fir'v.. be re--
sis'-c. "tscr.l-- M ui4d ouiJ 0e 20 pie j
'ra. rcaso1 va no, deemed sound; AL M n
/ 10 coded fhat .H h lI a lars. ue.rn- :
NON mn Tor .voport. ar Beach rcf Sod 70
! CT neused tltn se,euptori.y.
ms HEBREWS NEw rEPARErrY.
sellr es- t..tiacd that be W. con len
i'"'siy o.ros-d 20 capital p1n'snment hs o.
o. Celiei nsiwitl -t<aA.ag. 1-s Beach
srsl,a uni ire juror nsd NJ the re.-
and Jur-- bfrr-'t sai-, / % We 10 sympathy
ssi-s. -cr- 'ie- 500, ~. not allow nan 20 q
We I .
Nla.- saia a. new I'D iut he sworn - ! y. ?
It ...lIe - ! x cp. 10 ier cousLki u ; N-t
A. .-.tI % @ So 10 aatn 60 un1 a Va 'l Pc
t.A.- Hl.A .Hs evil. u-r BEE void f sH.
% ra- e. b.; ir 80 tne sl1f'en.1 boz
Fs4e So s. g. i-.f s.'t- 2i i.i-
cd. 4r..re g. 20 500 doctrine % n ere fo' an
tia -aI . t1-tl p teoth g. .-it - &c ~ -
cc.t beginning lm - r1sral Jev'.
ski .!r-s, Slerr4a T. Cpl', was secors J az
t-I- g.. h.. - read 100 80 tA4- ed .-el
f-.utec 40 . the case. yet b. n. ortni. o.
We insf scanned w. calp-oie. Ne y b ~
D. r n = |HsH
walLJ -a u over-o7f ~ or 90 i- r.r.u %,
~ "a G-. ga rsyt. ace .'red D., nes donl from
ol ur, JiGice. ana al -cce, -H'.
wi.nin be osy uccr cxcu-en - hagin< e. lnion-
q t~r own rr-eeu ir scrf4-ie- -lf-s'
capita. n4ni-AuIent. Lg- fog otter rsa-oGs, . o.
Tue prosecution hAd eeai.en.ed three AnG iAs
ceielee three.
rHE JURY Law.
The section q tue jury law ofls7a dese-iNine
the aui. nc4ti las II al Impartial juror 5 a
TIE rr,vioas forrs'ios srprsssioa % a. o,inicr
= II Iselo4 "a feisss-se 20 - si's1 -
IL. rs re sust or 'uaoc-n- o. re p ison--. 80
- Nos = ..utssi q s-o4ra ,fealieas ~ prn-f
a., II, 4. 1870 . -,
yiS--' toe p~rsoa " pod q. iaros 30 ta.y nAv
i-fl- 80 .. : : = 'ssA - IA ~ 81 :
eys -; ~ cia -eaicr a. i1s4r d vrr- G; sc =
~ - Z. 49, W W. ~ % 20, - "
III 40 ia. 81 - see b. verdict are crowded. ~
eourt .sal - s,tfe 'h-ttre isrs7u @ s-up sed =
!1rr -f~s pot rufrr,arl snch rrcsent cpl-loa q
s.gie .-dus sce ~ vefc.ct - juror.
The previous Law disquAiiled the possessor O
an op'ri1n, nrlNltnst --dil- be n i~nt pr e.
AGILITY - at irpu-tiaiiy. rre new rule, how
ever. doe not facillts'e tie wqts OF =etuni
iufies. cause few men are wh.1g u swea
that tnei- urcj dice Viii not 10 sou4e e1ten- IN
nuence their ver.ict.