Fayetteville observer. [volume] (Fayetteville, Tenn.) 1850-1966, 1875-07-22

| NSA0 WAA 81, W ehN ~ VI lAAlE
great Capitol, and spurning
then with his foot the crest of
Liberty, let him set out upon
his flight, while the two houses
Of Congress-" and here Evarts
faced the Senate and raisedl his
hitherto subdued voice to ring
ing cry, "and all the people Of
the United States shall shout,
Sic atur dd ostra.'" Then,
quietly, to the court: "But
here a distressing doubt strikes
mellow will the manager get
back? He will have gone far
beyond the reach of gravitation
to restore him, and so ambitious
a wing as his could never stoop
to a downward fight. Indeed,
and as he passes through the
consultations, that famous
question of Carlyle, by which
he derides the littleness of hu-
man affairs upon the scale of the
measure of the heaven, What
thinks Betes, as he drives his
dog up the zenith in their race
of siderial fre?' will force it.
self on his notice. What, in
deed, will Betes think of this
new constitution"
HE SPOKE VERY QUIETLY AND
NEVER A SMILE ON HIS THIN
LIPS,
but there were roars Of laugh
ter TO the very last row in the
gallery, that even the Chief
Justices authority could not
subdue. Public feeling ran
high on both sides. The day
of the final vote it eliminated.
The galleries were crowded.
frightfully crowded-by 8 o.
clock, and to prevent an antici-
pated outbreak, three armed
policemen stood in each little
aisle. The court met at II, amid
profound silence; there were a
few minutes debate on some
question of order, trifle that
only seemed to receive atten-
ton SO as to delay the supreme
moment. At last the Chief
Justice, ON the motion of Will
liams of Oregon, announced
that the Senate would proceed
to vote.
AS each Senator's name was
called and arose and answered
guilty" or ':not guilty" to the
following question put by the
Chief Justice, also standing:-
Mr.. Senator, how say you, is
the respondent, Andrew John
son, President of the United
States, guilty or not guilty of a
high misdemeanor, as charged
in this article of impeachment"
THEY VOTED IN THE FOLLOWING,
ORDER:
l. Anthony, (R. ID guilty;
2. Bayard, (Del.0 not guilty; |
Buckalew, (Pa.,) not guilty; 3.
Cameron, Pa.,) guilty; Cattell,
N.Jy y)guilty; Chandler, Mich, y
guilty; Cole, (Cal.,) guilty; 4.
Conkling, On. W guilty; Con-
ness, (Cal.,) guilty; Corbett,
(Oregon,) guilty; 5. Cragin.
IN. H.,) guilty; Davis, (Ky-) !
not guilty; Dixon, Conn., not
guilty; Doolittle, (Wis.,) not
guilty; Drake, (Mo.,) guilty; 6.
Edmunds, (Vt.) guilty; Fes-
sender, Me., not guilty; Fowl
er, (Tenn not guilty: 8. FIRE.
linghuysen, IN. J.,) guilty;
Grimes, Qowa,) not guilty; Har-
Ian, Qowa,) guilty; Howard,
(Mich.,) guilty; Hendricks,
Ind.,) not guilty; 8. Howe,
wis, } guilty; johnson, (Md.0
not guilty; 10. McCreery, Ky.0 !
not guilty; Morgan, On. J.,) /
guilty; II. Morrill,, (Me.,) gull
ty; IL. Morrill,, (Vt.,0 guilty;
13. Morton, Qnd., guilty; Nye,
(Nevada,) guilty; n orton,
(Minn.,) not guilty; Patterson,
(N. H. guilty; Patterson,
(Tenn.,) not guilty; Pomeroy,
{ (Kansas,) guilty; Ramsey Min
nesota,) guilty; Ross, Ran.,)
not guilty; Salisbury, Oel.,)
not guilty; Sherman, (OhioO
guilty; Sprague, Or. ID guilty;
Steward, (Nev.,) guilty; Sum-
ner, (Mass.,) guilty; Thayer,
(Neb., guilty; Upton, Neb.,)
guilty; Trnmbull, Qn.O not
guilty; Van Wrinkle, (W. Va.)
not guilty; Vickers, (Md.,) } not
guilty; Wade, (Ohio,) guilty;
Wiley, CIV. Va.,) guilty; Will
liams, (Oregon,), guilty; Will
son, Mass.0 guilty; Yates,
Qh.,) guilty.
Although it had been rumor-
ed that some of the Republicans
would vote ''not guilty." the
DroOle cOuld not believe If. and