New-York tribune., 1874-10-23

have the right to determine whether t VIII %
healthful to the Church TO put such man
In the episcopate, and that now III .
very sensitive condition Of the church. objections when
would be overlooked under other circumstances snoud
cause the rejection of tho Bishop elect One OF the
things that produced the strongest effect upon the
rssul. letter to Bishop Coke. read by Dr. sheney
of Virginia, Wednesday. and confirmed yesterday by
apaper read by william Welsh Of Philadelphia. Tho
letter written than year since, by che Rev.
Samuel Buel. Professor In the NewYork Theological
Seminary, showing that Prof. Seymour had allowed
Father Grafton Rtuast Of Boston. to have access to
the Students In the semnsrY The other paper. which
was obtained almost By accident. WAS an address by
Prof. Buel to the students, warning them against the
teachings OF Father Grafton. Another charge made
that he aided In the introduction into the daconae
Of o young who had expressed In his essay ex-
doctrines with regard to the Real Presence In the
Among the documents which have been distributed
circular Of the sse
This was record Of special for excn day OF
the %cpt gs form OF pTye sr se ay
directions for blowing to the altar tne sen o. @ .he
n in The
Of Prof Seymour were much dispeased win ~ tne
ton They claim that ali objections to Prof sey,
were not presented In bulk so as 10 allow aa
dr. snesy was read until was
to have been taken on wednesday although had Deen
In his possession, they assert. three days. .,..
The last seemed to narrow down to this that
declined to keep the young men under his charge
that they were sanctioned instead Of being merely
tolerated by the Church. Over this the contest RACED
close contest too. Up TO yesterday morning. even IN
the Convention Prof Seymours prospects looked very
bright when the letters and papers mentioned nad
been read there change Judge Ots;
before summing up In the afternoon Is sald
To- have announced, In order 10 induce
the delegates to vote the candidate that the COM
,nttee on CanOus had nearly completed canon wnch;
IL adopted, would restrain all excesses In ritual All
that the rejection OF the Bishop eect mas
been necessary. Whether IL will react upon MIN IN s
position 10 the Seminary is not yet shown. The House
of Bishops is thus relieved from the consideration o tno
The Illinois diocese will be obliged 10 can an
other convention their next candidate VIII come pc
fore the various Standing Committees and not before
convention. 40 -,.,.. --..ao
this statement "This discussion, which has been caed
an ecclesiastical bubatng, Is believed 70 nave nnay
question of extreme Rtualism ana 10 nave
she wn that Church does not countenance IT. VIII
be a general relief to the public mind. which mas
been very much excited This seemed, III soine
sort, to be q contest between the Bishop
of New-YOrk backed up by the innuence
OF Trinity Church. and the more Independent conserva
tive members OF the Church Bishop Potter Is an nt
mate friend Prof Seymour and has been instrumental
In keeping him In the Seminary, and wrote Ietter IN
his behalf which been read in the House OF Bshops
The vote against him would have been still larger na
it not the largo number OF his personal trehds
among the delegates.