The Fremont weekly journal. [volume] (Fremont, Sandusky County, Ohio) 1867-1877, 1874-02-20

an lnSuTanC6 using Iu6 plalQLlH
money, fI5, 1892, and paying but
sl3,619.09, reserving TO himself Ei,-
5I3.I3.
FIFTH PETITION
Asks judgment for $94,150. 1t al
leges that in June 1870 defendant
was directed to sell two thousand two
hundred and twenty eight shares of
stock and that defendant sold it for
S65,000 and turned over to the COM
pany only $43,735.O9, reserving to
himself $2I, ,265. That between Sep
tember Ist, 1870 and December 30th,
1870, defendant sold fifteen hundred
shares OF stock for $34,500 and &C
counted for but $24,619.90 reserving
SO, 5000 for his own use. That the
defendant signed the name Of plain
tiff to q draft on the treasurer Of
plaintiff. payable to F. Clark, Esq,
for $3.50, which money was paid
to defendant and appropriated by
him to his own use. That defendant
converted to his own use $3.50 of
plaintiffs money by pretense that
plaintiff was indebted in that sum to
J. Wheeler; $3.50 is claimed on a
similar transaction and 500 on an
other Other claims in the petition
for various causes are as follows:
5000 for the purchase of lumber
cars; $500 for rents appropriated to
himself; 81 900 for ever charge on
note; $4,000 for money converted
to the,use of defendants partner ].
D. Chamberlain; $500 for interest
fraudulently pretended to be due as
interest on q note of Benz. Gilker
son; $700 for similar transaction;
$3.50 for money that defendant frau
dulently pretended that the company
owed to n. T. Peet of Toledo;
So, 900 for the following sums which
the defendant converted to his own
use claiming them as commissions
for having endorsed notes; $3.50,
1929, $7445, $3.50, $l25, 5000, $685.
SO, 1925, $3.50, 1920, $75, $50, $780,
53, 1925, $3.50, $257.5O, $I26 for
fraudulent conversion of money in
contract for railroad wood.
Tue seventeenth section Of this
petition sets forth that defendant
was employed at a large salary to
attend to the duties of the road and
that he speculated largely in real e.
tate using his time in that business.
That he paid himself for Office rent
from March IL to September '73
over 81, 900 and to John McKelvey
$500 for which the plaintiff received
no consideration whatever and was
damaged $4,000.
The eighteenth count charges
that defendant conveyed the COM
pany's land to John McKelvey, pre-
tending to sell it to him, for $4,000
and that McKelveY and Sloane sold
the same for $4,000 for which the
company claims $4,000.
Two other similar speculations
are charged for which 5000 snd
81, 800 are claimed.
SIXTH PETITION.
First-That the defendant con-
verted to his own use the sum Of
which he obtained of the
treasurer of the plaintiff by falsely
alleging that the plaintiff owed that
amount to Benford and Gay of Mich
igsn, thereby damaging the plaintiff
$500.
Second-That the defendant, by
q similar transaction with Dun and
Washington, D. c., OBJ
tanned s4eO, damaging the plaintiff |
5000.
Third-A transaction in the pur-
chase of Il. S. & NJ. S. railway
stock in March, 1870, $500, damag-
ing the plaintiff s4eO.
Fourth-A transaction beteen the |
defendant and Jay Cooke & Co., in
which the defendant is alleged to |
have converted $60o belonging to |
the plaintiff to his own use, damag-
ing the plaintiff 5000.
Fifth-That in June, 1857, the |
defendant by falsely stating that he |
had expended 3,S0416 in insuring
the property of the plaintiff, drew s
draft upon the treasurer Of the plain
tiff for that amount, and had it
cashed by Jay Cooke & Co., and
procured the treasurer of the plain
5if to pay said draft; that said
money was converted to his own use,
TO the damage of the plaintiff, IS, 900.
Sixth-That the defendant in Ju-
y, 1858, in an insurance transaction
With Charles A. Wood Of Boston ap-
to his own use s277.50 Of
,he plaintiffs money, to the damage
If the plaintiff $3.50.
SeVenth-A similar transaction in
June, 1869, with the same party,
Iame amounts.
Eight-That the defendant on the
-lth day of January, 1873, executed
n the name of the plaintiff two notes
or 81, 1886 and s856.74, respective
y, to Lee & Moss, falsely pretend
Ag that that amount was due said
parties from the plaintiff as a rebate
If twenty five cents per ton on coal
'hipped by them over the plaintiffs
DAD in 1872, said rebate having al
eady been fully paid by them, as
vas well known by defendant, to the
lamage of the plaintiff 8 $1,000.
All the realty owned by Rush R.
Sloane is covered with attachments,
md with the suits pending against
lin he will have more to look after
han any ordinary individual would
are about tending to. He has
in several counties of the
tate and in the cities of Boston and
yhicago, upon all of which the plain
ifs against him have had an atten-
i've eye.
The GrRngers and Politios.