davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04

SUpSsMe C9URT-cIRCUlT.

Singular Divorce Case-A Woman
Charged with Bigamy-She Accuses Her
Husband Of Conspiracy.
Before Judge Gilbert
Frederick Otto's suit for an absolute divorce
from Mary j. Otto, on the ground OF adultery, was
tried yesterday. The couple were married in 1860
and have lived since then in Brooklyn. Frederick
is German and Mary English The plaintiff claimed
That the defendant had also committed Digamy by
marrying one Frank Collins in January, 1870 He
sought to establish this by the testimony Of Mary
Boulton, who formerly lived in the house with de-
PENDANT, who swore that she was present when
Mrs. Otto and Collins were married BY
Rev. DR.. Searles. 1t appeared during the
examination OF Mary Boulton, that she herself was
q married woman, but did not live with ner hus-
band. At first she emphatcally denied that she
was married. but when her husband, whose name
is Dean appeared In Court, and the articles OF sep
aratlon between them were produced she was
compelled to own up. Mary explained that she did
not recognize him as her husband although she
Was never divorced from him.
Judge Gilbert stated that he would not allow any
witness to go unpunished who swOre falsely.
Rev. Dr. Searles testified that on the Goth Of jan
uary, 1870, he married Frank b. Collins and Mary
6. otto; he was not wiling TO swear TO the iden;
ike the woman-more than Mary Boulton, to
whom his attention was also called:
The defence was that the plalntin had conspired
with Mary BOultOn and Collins In order to obtain
divorce, and that Mary represented herself as Mrs.
Otto and was married 70 FRANK; II was iuTther
innate with BoultOn, alias Mrs. Dean. The testi-
mony submitted by the defence was principally as
to the bad character OF this woman. The wit
nesses declared that they would not believe her
under OATH One witness said that the sign ature
to the marriage certificate given by Dr.. Seares
did not look like Mrs. Otto's handwriting. Mrs.
Otto stoutly denied the truth Of the charges
against her.
The jury rendered verdict for the defendant.
The counsel for tae defence, a young man, was
overoyed at this result that before the jury had
been discharged, he proceeded to thank them most
pr0iuseiy
Judge Gilbert interrupted the young man and
notified him that such proceeding was not proper
at that stage OF affairs. The counsellor subsidized.
The incident created considerable merriment in
the court room.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
COURT CALENDARS--TniS DAY.

SUPREME CouRr-CmCUIr-Part 2-Held by Judge
Lawrence.-Nos. 1893, :l52 l2l4, 1868 1890 2go4
1870, 1917, I67d Part 3-Held by Judge Van
Vorst.-Nos no. 277 $685. 49, 1857, 1867, ma. s35,
1lo 25i9 l57 445, ll25. 12ol 47S, 800. l49h, 1896
1497.
SUPREME COURT-SPECIAL TERM-Hed by Judge
Van Brun-Nos. l0 l02, l03 lO4, l05, 100 107, los,
lo9, lo, III IL, 49, IA 1l5 1l6 III rs lig 10
1885, 1874, 1885, 1856 49, 1873, 40, l4l, l42 l4 i4 lAo
l46, l47, l4S. LAP, $50, ISL, 1872.
SUPREME COURT-CHAhBERs-Held by Judge
Barett-Nos. Al AS as 50, 621s, 81, 70, so. 81, 80,
100, 1875, l54, 154s, 155, ia.
SUPERIOR CoURr-rRlAL TERM-Part l.-Ad-
lourned until February Part He'd "a, oy -, Judge a6S
7S4, SiO 77s, 7l6, 764, 7se, 1853.
COURT oP COMMON PLRAs-TRIAL TERM-Part !.
1899 1851 2o4O, l07 242O 2lo lS43, 2l2o, 1928 2ozs
2l76 2lS5. Part 2-Held by Judge j. T. Daly.-Nos.
1885, 25l9 1866 3s03 1856, 25ss. $780, 25s 1897 $685.
MARINE CouRT-TRIAL TKRM-Part Held by
Judge Snea.-Nos 1910, S0ol, 1896, 3l!o 4ls3 I'D
1880 So92 1910 1905 1882 $780, SlS4 S2l4 SoSS $50
3175, 4053 2643 265 2S7l 29o3 4O27 2925, 1882 500
3236, 1881, 1929, 4055, 453, 4165, 4ls Part -Held
by Judge McAdam Mos 1914 1923, 4227, 2Sl5, 3712,
Sls 3s7 4l66, al44 1894 1884 2sz2 as47 3sld, S94s
COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS-Held by Recorder
Hackett.-The People vs.. Christian King, burglary /;
Same vs. James Manning. burglary; same vs.
William Cresswel and alias Bill Common, two cases,
burglary; same VS.. julius ErdOsey and Frederick
Koerher, burglary and grand larceny; same VS.:
James Campbell and John Whallan, burglary and
grand larceny; Same vs. Alfred Jaques, two cases,
Burglary and receiving stolen goods; same vs..
James O'Neil, ielonious assault and battery; same
vs.. Frederick Lubo telonious assault and battery
Same vs. Louis Hilaro. ielonioas assault and bat.
terry; Same VS.. Thomas McKeon, ielonlous assault
and battery; Same vs. Carl schultz and William
Gurgscheln forgery; Same vs.. julius f. Zechoney,
perjury; Same VS. William Kemp, false pretences
Same vs. James Young, false pretences
Brady-The People vs. william Adams and Jere-
miah Mcclure, feionous assault and battery
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
SUPREME C0URT-cHAMbEaS.
Decisions.

BY Judge Lawrence.
In the Matter, &c, Norwood, ted.
Holloway vs. Stepnens.-Order granted.
Casanova VS.. Derby Coal CONTEMPLATION de-
MED.
People ex rel. Stiner vs.. Schmidt; People ex rel.
Rosenthal VS.. Same.-De1auits opened on con-
ditions.
By Judge Barrett.
Jackson vs.. Walker, Alder vs.. Wider DemareSt
VS.. Barry, Brinkerhoff VS.. Vanguard, Manufacture
ers' National Bank OF Philadelphia VS.. Schneider.
&C., Mercantile National Bank Of New YORK vs.,
DrIggs, Mutual Life Insurance Company VS.. Mar.
tin, Strasburger VS.. Davidson, Hegeman VS..
TORY, WatrouS VS.. Lutkin, COnkling VS.. Senior,
Migie, Union Dime savings Bank vs.. Duryee
Meyer VS.. Gordon, Mercantile National Bank vs.
Jones, Hart b. and NJ Manufacturing Company
VS.. Clayton, Corples vs. George, Van Vleet VS..
Snyder, Levy VS.. Farrell, Boynton VS.. Whitlock,
Barbarosa VS.. Stevenson, Russell VS.. Whitman,
vandervlee, Knapp VS.. Alden Stihbins vs.. Pollard,
Bally VS.. BALDWIN, Lenan VS.. South Side Rail-
road Company, Tobias VS.. Conkling, Kemp
ton Andrews, First National Bank OF
Lebanon McClees, Belden vs.. Gentel,
Ross VS. Heyman Franklin Savings Bank vs..
New Haven, Westchester and r Railway, Hartford
b. and M. Manufacturing Company VS.. Kennedy,
Bently VS.. Cummings, White vs.. Phillips, Forrest
VS.. Towne, Resenstein VS.. Llchtensteln, Deiden
&c. VS.. Roberts, Whitlock VS.. Dorin.-Motlon
granted.
Masury VS.. Pettes.-Motton denied.
Dean VS.. Malion.-MotIon granted, with $40 costs,
to abide event.
Thomson VS.. Dlsbrow.-Motion granted, with $40
costs.
White VS.. Philips Shaw vs.. showy.-Lee memo
fandum.
Edwards VS.. Bangs. Reference ordered.
BY Judge Donohue.
Huse VS.. Huse Granted.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
COURT CT SPECIAL SESSIONS.
Cruelty to Animals-Hr. Bergh De-
feated-Thc Prisoner Discharged.

Cruelty to Animals-Mr. Bergh De-
feated-The Prisoner Discharged.
Before Judges Otterbourg, Murray and Sherwood.
great part Of yesterday morning was occupied
in nearing the complaint Of Thomas ii. Upton
against Urah Stafford, charged with cruelty 10
animals. stafford, who is driver on the Filth
Avenue line OF stages, was arrested on the 18th OF
January, between eight and nine O'Clock in the
ing to the testimony OF Norman Notewager, an
officer OF the society for the Prevention OF Cruelty
to Animals, stafford on that evening was driving
lame horse and flashing 1t over the head with
whip, while the horse hardly able to move. Note
wager and Thomas II. Upton, also officer of the
society, were driving one OF the ambuances OF the
association at the time. Stafford. the stage driver,
was called down from his box and placed in the
hands OF an officer. This witness was cross.eX-
ahmed at great length and 1t elected that the
horse was left standing In Broadway twenty min
utes IN six inches OF snow.
Officer townsend, who made the arrest testified
that he had been brought up III the country among
horses and familiar with their ailments and
diseases; he said that the horses knee was
pam TO the animal; the horse was quite TAT and
otherwise IN good condition. he drove the team him.
self to the station house, No. 205 Mulberry street.
at smart trot; when the stage and horses were
brought there the officers OF the society were asked
what was 10 be done with the horses; one Of
them replied, damn the horses; what the hell
have we got 70 90 with the horses" the horses
were then left standing IN front of the station in
the cold Tor over two hours.
Oricer Townsend said that the horse suffered
more from exposure that night than 1t ever could
from the laneness OF the knee Joint.
UTiah stafford, the Imprisoned driver and sew
eral persons connected with the stage stable, tes
titled to the good condition OF the horse.
Mr.. Bergl pleaded strenuouSly Tor q conviction
and tried TO impeach the testimony Of the wit
Tor the deience but the Court acquitted the
prisoner.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
A CANADIAN SPECULATOR'S TPOU-
BLES.
Suit to Recover Alleged Usurious In-
tercst Stock Operations.

Marius Creveer is Canadian. Not finding in
that country Of cold climate, frigid tempera-
ments anu slow progress sufficiently fertile field
for speculative operations, thought he would try
his fortune here, ana SO boldly plunged into
Wall street speculauons. lie selected Drake
Brothers as the medium Of his operations The
stories OF the immense fortunes realized by our Van.
derDilts and Drews doubtless flied his Imagination
and, emulous OF their example and hopeful OF the
same results and led on by That often seductive u-
SION, Nothing venture, nothing win" he bought
largely OF stocks giving sure indication OF cup
ward tendency He happened TO enter on his
speculauons at an unlucky time. The panic came.
Everything went down with thud. He did not
have the Midas touch. Then came the day OF
reckoning and he became wiser but sadder man,
His money had gone, and he saw but one way OF
getting any Of it back This was to bring suit TO
recover usDTlOus charges, and with THIS intent he
accordingly Instituted suit against Drake
Brothers Tor fl5,UOO usurlous charges.
Mr.. William +. Drake was examined preliminary
TO the tral. He was examined at considerable
length regarding MS purchases and sales OF stocks.
Among the questions asked were the following
y can you refresh your memory by which you
eau state " n A. II the books snow IL could
u VIII you refresh your recollection so that You
can answer this question to-day or at any SUISSE
quent day to which tins examination may be adj
journed TOT A. decline 10 do 1t under any cir
cumstances.
q on wat ground is t9 On the ground that it
may tend TO crlminate you a. Yes
q In what respect do yOu contend that IL NAV
crimnate you A. am not lawyer, aud cannot
answer that question.
q What, then, Is the ground OF your objection
A. That nave already stated.
q. Can you not be more definite A. No, sir.
q. 10B nave stated That you fear 1t may crlmi-
nato you but you are not able 70 state the reasons
why you ear II may crlminate you. Is that the
only answer you can give TO the question pro-
pounded A. III the only answer VIII give.
In supreme Court Chambers, before Judge Law.
renee, motion was made yesterday TO compel
Mr.. Drake TO answer more definitely the interroga-
tories given above Mr. William H. Anthem In.
sisted, ID an argument protracted at some lengtn
that Mr.. Drake spould be compelled to give spe-
clnc answers to the HETEROGENEOUS propoupded
He urged that the statutes were explicit on TINS
point and, Inasmuch as they allowed perfect i'm.
uunlty To tbe paTty beipg Examined rom All pans
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
ACTS OF CONGRESS.
When Do They Actually Become Law B.
Important Suit in the United States
Circuit Courl-Verdict Against the

When Do They Actually Become Law -
Circuit Court-verdict Against the
Government.
Yesterday the case OF n. D. Carlisle & Son vs.
Collector Arthur, which had been Instituted in the
United states Circuit Court before Judge Nathaniel
Shipman and jury, came up tor trial. The plain
tins as previously reported, are importers in this
city, and in that capacity imported quantity
of wool upon which the Collector levied
Q tax OF ten cents per pound and ad
valorem duty OF eleven cents the Collector
alleging that he authorized TO take this
course under the act OF Congress OF March 2, 1867
The duty thus imposed amounted TO $4,000, and
was paid under protest by Carlisle h son, who
brought this action against the government TO
recover back the amount eXacUed, and claimed
that The act OF Congress under which they were
assessed was unconstitutional on the ground that
IL not signed by the President until the 4th OF
March, 1867. The importation was made on the
day before the act received the signature OF Pres-
dent Johnson. The deposition OF ex-President
Johnson showed that though the act appeared to
have been signed by him on the I'd OF March, 1867,
the day OF lis passage. he did not actually sign 1t
until early in the morning OF the 4th OF March, 1867,
and that he acted thus in pursuance OF a custom
then prevailing with regard to the signing
OF bills passed by Congress. This deposition was
admitted in evidence by the Court. Mr.. J. H.
Choate, when the case came up yesterday, held
on the part OF the plaintiffs, that by admitting
evidence which showed that President Johnson
had not signed the act referred to Until the 4th of
March, 1867, the Court would in effect, decide thai
although Presidents were IN the habit, wnen they
approved OF acts or Congress. TO date them back
to the time when they were passed. the acts did
not, according TO the constitution, become law
until the very day when the President really signed
them. Judge Sniprnan briefly charged the jury
and directed them to find a verdict Tor the PLAIN
TINS. This they accordingly did. The amount o.
the verdict is $4,000 IN gold.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
SUPERIOR COURT-SPeCAl TERM.
Suit by the state OF Tennessee Against
the stockholders and Others of the
National Bank Of the Metropolis,
Washingtou. ID. &.

Suit by the state OF Tennessee Against
the stockholders and Others of the
National Bank OF the Metropolis,
Washington. ID. &.
Before Judge Van Brunt.
An interesting trial began In this Court yester.
day, which the State OF Tennessee as substitute
for the Tennessee National Bank OF Memphis, 10
plaintiff, and the treasurer, attorney and various
directors OF the National Bank Of the Metropolis,
Washington, D. c. the defendants. 1t Is alleged
in the complaint that firm In this city became In
debted to the National Bank OF Memphis in the sum
OF $4,000, for which were deposited colateras as
security in the National Bank OF the Metropolis
bonds Tor this amount having been sent as alleged,
TO Mr.. Davis by Judge Sherman, accompanied by .
letter. The Tennessee National Bank oil Memphis
failed In 1867 ana receiver was appointed Pre-
vous the National Bank OF the Metropolis had
become lnsOlvent. Shortly after the insolvency OF
the former bank the receiver of the National Bank
OF the Metropolis applied for return or the bonds
Mr.. Davis. the attorney OF the bank, 1t is alleged,
denied having received the bonds 1t Is further
alleged that Mr. DAVIS, acting upon the instlgatlon
OF the officers OF the bank applied these collaterals
for the peneht OF the bank The Attorney General
OF the State OF Tennessee applied to the Comp
troller OF the Currency in Washington TO have re-
celver appointed lor the Bank OF the Metropolis,
the debt collected and paid to the tennessee Ma
tonal Bank OF Memphis. The Comptroller, IT Is
sad, refused to accede to this request account,
OF the representations made to HIM by the Board
OF Directors OF the Bank OF the Metropolis The
case was good deal involved, but the main
charge that the defendants consplred to defraud
the Memphis Bank to which the Bank OF the
Metropolis Is alleged to be indebted The trial
promises TO last several days The parties sued
William B. Hatch, treasurer Of the deiunct Wash
ingtOn Bank; Theodore NJ. Davis District Attorney;
Lucius Chittenden. Theodore Koran and Franklin
Fairbanks directors. or course IN case OF this
magnitude there Is quite a retinue or counsel on
either side. the plaintiffs being represented by
Messrs. Brownell and Althrop, and the defendants
by Messrs Dunnlng, Edsan and Hart, L. J. Storrs
and GrosvenOr j. Hubbard.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
REAL ESTATE.

The following were the sales OF real estate IN the
open market yesterday. They mark an important
event in the current history OF the market In the
active interest they drew out and their splrlteo
result. The attraction was principally derived
from the Ofer OF the estate OF the late Andrew j..
Ireland by the executors. Subjoined are particu-
lars -
PROPERTY. A. II. MULLER AND SON.
story house and lot 10 Amity ST. n. S. between ,o
s. 18th and Thompson st., lot 25x90 j. Weeks 3D. D"
4 story house and lot, 81 Amiy ST., n. s, be-
tween Wooster ST. ana S. 9Th av lot 2oxl09; T. n ,.o
story brick house and lot SO Amity st. oppo- - ,o
site above lot 2l6X75; G. Booker. u.5O
story brick house and lot, u 5. 9th e. 8, - ,
Amity St, lot 81 ilxi2a6 A. Bernheimer H.s"
4 2story houses and lot, No. Gansevoort ST., s..
4th St. lot 26x96; j. Van Schack ........... li,9D
Brick building and lot 81 and 80 Sth west side
corner HOratio st., lot 69x2S 3x92x25xS76; +. G. 49, 80,
2story cottages IL and il Horato ST. n sth av.,
each lot n5xsS NJ MerKle. 16,o0o
8 story brick buildings tiront, story brick
shop GEAR and lot stl and S4l1 HUDSON ST.. W.
s., Gansevoort St. lot 2g4xll2.3; W. r. Foster. S,2O
81 story brick houses and lots 3p6, BUS and $40
10th av, e. g., B. 18th St., each lot la9x7O: f. 90 80,
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
ESSEX MARKET POLICE COURT.
A Bibulous Burglar.
Before Justice Otterbourg.


John smith, another OF that ubiquitous family
was held in default OF 81, 900 bail yesterday on a
charge of breaking into the liquor store Of Michael
Byrnes No. y Lewis street, and stealing therefrom
$25 and number of bottles, supposed to contain
WINE. OfiiCer Smlth-anOtner OF them-O the
Eleventh precinct who was on post at the time
arrested the prisoner while he trying 10 put a
When the case was finally disposed OF Justice otter.
bourg remarked, eli there are any more persons
named smith now IN court who require the atten-
ton OF the Court let them come lorward.D Three
women two girls and one old man stalked up 10
the Bench and had their wrongs redressed. They
all owned up 10 being OF 1.-THE SIXTH family.u
The Brothers May in Trouble.
Daniel May and Michael May, his brother, were
committed, in default Of 900 bail each Tor steal
ing clothing and iewelry valued at s54 from Pat.
rick Mahon, OF No. 90 Monroe street. They lived In
the same tenement house as complainant, ana wnen
arrested the stolen property was found IN their Dos
session. They said they found IL on the stars and
took IL into their rooms, gust Tor safe keepinp
The Judge committed them, ',just Tor sale Keep
Ing, and because he did not credit their story.
Rather Dear Beer.
william Bains, of No. 800 Broome street. at
tempted TO force open the door Of Anton Meyers
No 15l Bowery, on Monday night. lie was caught
In the act and arrested When committed yester.
DAY, in default OF $1,000 bail, he merely said that
he wanted glass OF lager, and thought the place
open. He was mistaken, however, and the
officer VINO arrested him states that he was trying
to force open the door wien some instrument.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
COURT or OYER AND TEaMIReR.
Highwaymnn Sent to State Prison for
Eight Years.


Eight Years.
Before Judge Brady.
Nearly all day yesterday was occupied in this
court in the trial OF william Adams, a youth only
nineteen years Old, charged with being one Of
gang OF three young ruffians who Knocked down
Mr.. E. r. Finch, No. 273 Lexington avenue, at the
corner of Thirty-fourth street and Tenth avenue
Mr.. Finch is gentleman sixty years OF age, and
while going to his residence was suddenly struck
on the head from behind, Knocked senseless to the
pavement and stabbed five times, one of the stabs
penetrating his lungs. His cries of murder attracted
the attention OF officer Crow, who arrested the
prisoner while running from Ninth to Tenth ave-
nue.. At his trial yesterday he was defended by
Mr.. william f. Howe, who undertook III the first
Mace TO move an alibi but this proved too thin
and he then undertook 10 make it out a case OF
mistaken identity. which defence proved still more
attenuated. On the examination it was
shown that the accused was member OF an or
ganization OF juvenile roughs calling themselves
friends gave MIN a good character the police
showed that he was hardened young wretch.
Mr. Howe IN summing up PLEADED cn most earnestly
verdict OF guilty but with strong recommends
ton to mercy
Judge Brady though he might have sentenced
him TO twenty years Imprisonment, only gave HIM
eight years, at which the prisoner seemed quite
thankful. 1t was, IN fact, clear case, ana the
evidence so Overwhelmingly strong against the
accused that no other verdict tnan the one given
could have been rendered.
tbarSe OF attempted biaCkmans
Application made upon a writ OF habcas
corpus for the discharge Of Mrs. Anna NJ. Barker
II appeared that some time since she sent letter
by her daughter TO MIR. j. b. johnson, demanding
from him $50 This request Mr.. Johnson refused
10 comply with, and thereupon she sent, as al
legged second letter demanding $50. 600, in which,
as claimed, she reminded him OF an insult
he mad offered her the cars from
Washin 2ton 20 this city, and at the same time
gently insinuating that unless he complied forth
with she would inform her husband and he would
become a third party in the case. To this second
missive Mr.. Johnson paid no attention, and then
quickly followed It's heels one In which she
moderated her demands however TO $500. By
this time Mr. Johnson thought best TO call on her
lawyer, to whom she referred to IN the course OF
her correspondence, but he could get nothing
satisfactory from him. Mr.. McClennan who made
the application, claimed that no offence mad been
committed and that Mrs. Barker was entitled 10
her discharge. Judge Brady, alter perusing the
letters took q different view OF the case, pro-
nounced them certainly threatening In character,
ana said the case must go before the Grand Jury.
Meantime he ordered the prisoner to be renanded
to priSOn.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS.
Decisions.

Albany, Feb. 3, 1874.
The following decisions have been rendered by
the Court OF Appeals
Judgments affirmed with costs.-Schen vs.
Plumb; Smith vs.. Coe; Torrance vs. Conger;
Lasher vs.. Williamson; Eberell vs.. Mehrbach;
stewart VS.. Petrie.
Judgments afrirmed.-The People eX rel. Parker
vs.. The County Court OF Jefferson county; Morgan
vs.. The People &C.
Judgments reversed and new trials granted, the
costs to abide the event.-Chapman VS.. The Erie
Railway Company; Chasselotte VS.. The Erie Rail-
way Company; HOMAGE VS.. The New York Gen.
trail and Hudson River Railway.
Judgment reversed and the proceedings Of the
County Judge vacated.-Tne People ex rel. Atkins
vs. Hnghitt.
Judgment reversed and proceedings of assessors
vacated--The People ex rel. Akin VS.. Morgan.
Appeal dismissed, with costs--The People ex rel.
The Schuyierviiie and Upper Hudson Railroad VS..
Belts.
ordered that the cause stand over until after the
next OF this Court and that before the meet
ing OF the Court after such the appellant elect
whether avail himself OF the order OF September
80 1873, without costs OF this motion TO either
party-Halgarten VS.. Eckert
Calendar.
ALBANY, Feb. g. 1874
The following is the Court OF Appeals calendar
for February 4:-Nos. SO, 49, 90, 90 90, TO- SO, So.