New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1874-09-14
TIE BROOKLYN SCANDAL.
rYrEcr OF MR.. MoULToS's SECOND PAPER-dIS'
rRAcY's REPLY TO CERTAIN SECTIONS

rvrrcr OF Mr. MOULTONs SECOND PAPER-GES'
TRACY's REPLY TO CERTAIN SECTIONS
The statement of Mr.. Moulton was the sud-
,ect Of general discussion In business circles on oa.u
day Apparently ITS effect upon the pubic was 'ae 1000
detrimental 70 Mr. Beecher than the former paper om
the same source. B. F. Tracy. the connsei VI M
Beecher Is very ontspoken In denouncing INC "no,o
paper To the section in which he was personaly 'n
70 figure in questionable relations Mr. Tracy intenos 70
,vo hs Immediate attention and TO make at an early
dav a formal reply He stated yesterday TO TRIBUNE
renorer that Mr. Moulton had deliberately attempeo
TO place him In false position" but that nc kno" .,9
facts in the case and effort OF MT. Moultoh oouu
change them. He did not suppose the publc "ero
greatly interested in regard to the personal Issue Do
tween Mr. Mouton and himself; he was "iiinR " io'
his record answer whether not he had preserved MS
dignity as COUNSEL but for his own satisfaction ho
should soon show the fasty OF M Mouton's insinua-
tons What he should say would be In formai way
OF other parts OF the statement Mr. Tracy spoKe uo
eidedy. Mr.. Moulton had not explained away Tue
charge OF backma against him. MI beecner nAu
stated that he had paid money to Mr. Mouiton LUZ '
benefit Of Mr. TiltoD and that Mr. Moulton had rcceou
and disbursed that money for his best friend wno ne
now pre tends, had received at the hands OF inc aa
who paid the greatest wrong that one man can
rsamcnts Of the money received from such source
by oneswho pretended TO have been me pest W
lis recent and disbursement he admits himself III ms
own statement before Mr. Beecher ever made MS STATE
ment public He SAID that Mr.. Beecher never Owne1
anv of The Golden ge stock and that his payment Oh
money for support very different tnhg the
nosition of other citizens OF Brooklyn VINO
actually subscribed for stock Mr. Beeehers aDe
ton was made two years AFTER tue p i
was started and paid without any consldera
on i'm return Mr.. Tracy SAID OF the reputed letter Oh
retraction from the unmarried lady tnat u reerr r
wholly TO business transaction with MI Beecner re-
gardng which she had spoken severely OF nun 10 Her
friends The note itself showed that 1t could not REFER
70 what Mr. Moulton precnds to believe Mt. tracy
further said "The friends OF this lady some days ago,
hearing Of the use Mr.. Moulton was about 10
make OF this letter, caused TO be mace "
him a full explanation OF Its meaning; aho
Mr. Beecher's correspondence, which occurred IA
wears ago. relating to this matter ana 1uly expalnnH
Il was Shown TO Mr.. Moultous intimate ana conndenual
friend aud the injustice and outrage OF such use as IS
now made of that note clearly pointed out TO nm;
That this information was conveyed TO Moulton aho
that he fully understood it, his statement clearly
shows because refers to the efforts OF his friends W
save her from this great outrage aud he knew ana u
derstood the facts" ,,-., .o.
Mt IIlton was Dusily employed with his counsel yes
teday and during the present week his long answer "
the Committee and 10 Mr. Beecher will Dc puDllshcd