The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1874-03-11
RUTLAND COUNTY, COURT.
March FERN, 1874.
Hon. HoYT II. WHEELER, Chief Judge.
" ISAAC G. WHEATON, ; Asst judges.
HEEL HOLLIsTER, 'N''

Hon. HoYT II. WHEELER, Chief Judge.
" Isaac Is G. WnEAroN' Asst Judges.
" HEEL HOLLIsTER,
HENRY II. SMITH Clerk.
Tuesdag. Maych TO- The Rutland couu-
ty court convened at the court house on
Tuesday afternoon at . o'clock. After
prayer by Rev. II i Austin of the Mctho-
dist church, the sheriff, Hon. William NJ
Field, made the customary proclamation OF
opening of the court for business.
The roll of petit jurors was called as
follows:
Benson, James II Aiken. Allen l. Hale.
Brandon, Phineas W Taft, Charles VI
Winslow.
Castlcton, Charles S Proctor, Truman n
Hooker.
Chiltenden, Danforth Brown.Jno Brown
Fairhayen, John G Ptkin, John p Shell
don.
IIubbardton, Chandler b Gibbs,
Stephen Il Allen.
Pittsiield, William DAVIS, Daniel Avery.
Pittsford, Rollin G Smith, Newton Kel-
logg.
Poultney, i L Thompson, Rollin Mar
shall.
Rutland, Moses Hayward, Fayette Vau
CHAN, b NJ Bailey.
Sherburne, Constantine w Adams Milo
J Moore.
Sudbury, Scion Breeze. John 4 Griffin
West Haven, julius G Norton, Henry j
Adams.
Twenty-four of whom answered 10 their
names.
a L Hale OF Benson was excused for the
reason Of being postmasterat Benson Land
ing,
Jacob Dewey OF Poultney was drawn
in place of Rolln MARSHALL, who was too
i'll to serge.
The court then proceeded to call por-
ton of the jury calendar, and the follow
ing orders were made:
DOCKET
No 81. r r. Thral vs. s II Langlon
set not for jury by plaintiff by direction of
the court.
No % Hodges VS. Eddy for nearing by
court
No 40. Stevens VS. Billings; trial by jury.
No 46 Miller VS. Slate Company ; con
tinucd
No &c. Harrison vs. Harrison; continued.
No 60. Adams vs. Clark; continued.
No IS. Edgerton vs. Eddy tor hearing
by the court.
No 70. Stannard VS. Phelps trial by
jury.
jury.
by the court.
No 50. Dawley vs. Hogan set not for
jury by defendant
No 81. Ketcham VS. Orchard & Page
discontinued.
No 81 and o. Marshal vs. Orchard &;
Page discontinued.
No 104. Vaughan VS. Child; trial by jury.
No III. Hathaway VS. Insurance Com
pany /; trial by jury.
No 1l3 Lapham VS. Pierce not for jury
by defendant.
No 1875. Logan vs. Gddings; for hearing
by the court.
No 14S Birdsal VS. Pond; for hearing
by the court.
No $40. Brandon Manufacturing Com
pany VS. Morse trial by jury.
No $50. Clement & son VS. Porter;
continued.
No 1872. Tapln VS. Pond; discontinued.
No 1853. Tubbs VS. Post trial by jury.
No 15S. Kelley VS. Adair; hearing by
the court.
No 100. Horsc-rake Company VS. Star
| key; hearing by court.
No 16l. Bucklin VS. Ray; trial by jury.
! No 1862. Carey VS. Vermont Mutual Fire
Insurance Company; for hearing by the
| court.
No 1853. Clark VS. Slocum; trial by jury.
No 1G5. Congdon IL York vs. Kelley &
| Bradford; hearing by court.
No 172 Fuller VS. Hayward; trial by
jury.
jury.
No IA. Griffin VS. ellison; trial by jury.
No IN. Hawkins VS. Bissell trial by
jury.
No $50. James VS. Holden trial by jury.
No 1856 Kingsley VS. ellison trial by
jury.
No 1877. Lewis and wife VS. Rutland ;
discontinued.
No 1888. Lewis VS. Rutland; discontinued.
No 1913. Mansfield VS. Pratt ; hearing by
the court.
No 1874. Ormsbee vs. Kidder; trial by
jury.
No 1876. Ormsbec VS. Kdder and others
trial by jury.
This comprises about one-third of the
jury calendar, of which twenty-scvcn were
set for trial by jury or the court. This in
dicatcs plenty of business for the term.
The court then took up No. 40, Benja
min Stevens vs.. Leeds Billings. The SEES
sion was occupied IN taking testimony fol-
both plaintiff and defendant. The plain
tiff will resume taking testimony lhi.
morning. Edgerton IL Nicholson and "
G Veazcy for plaintiff. c II Joyce
Proul, Simons & Walker for defendant
The court took recess until o O'Clock
this morning.
Hon IIiel HOLSTER, one of the assistant
judges, was unable TO be present from ILL.,
ness, which will detain him at home fol-