The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-03-01

racing aliSsions. At the dose Of the trial, when
the verdict OF guilty was pronounced, ne threw
written, ats the ridinq that's done It, "impyina
that it was the manner In which the case had been
conducted that led TO this1ate In the end This was
tod afterwards to Sir A. Cockburn and he Is SAID to
have declared 1t the greatest compliment ever paid
on either side OF the Lord Chief Justice sit
Justices Luslr and Mellor. There 10 nothing par
ticuarly noticeable In either Of them, save tnat
the name OF the first gave occaai0n for an ex-
ceIlent joke attributed TO Mr.. Hawkins. Shortly
alter the elevation " M. Lush to the judicial
nament. there was grand banquet, At which Mr.
Hawkins who had toast to propose, said, 1T Is
an no S1 10 aa
can better sum up the meaning IN giving q
toast, Lush and Sheen Immediately in front OF
the bench is the attorneys table, at when sat
- THE CLAIMANT.
His photographs, which are exactly like him. are
by no means plain, save nom It's enormous GUAM aIe
titY OF iowl, rather low forehead, bright eyes,
onn s'h bulk qnSss lip and
caravan; but his movements are '' toier ,ai,
light and active and his hands and feet are excep-
tlonaly small and well shaped. Throughout the
Whole OF the trial ne las exhibited any ner-
Vousness or much more sign OF interest than might
be expected from an ordinary spectator. lie
smiles from time to time az some OF the testimony.
ana Keeps up an animated conversation with his
DR.. Kenealy who sits just behind him, In
- THE FRONT ROW OF THE BAR.
The Doctor Is remarkably clever man. an Irish.
man Of great literary attachments. He Is q uni
yersal lingust, and OF his greatest poem, "A New
great, OF rare and sustained geniusn But some
how or other he has never attained an adequate
Sc s Sws to
AT the other end or tneseat are to be found
THE COUNSEL FOR THE PROSECUTION
with the thin, keen face and the bright restless
eye, VINO 10 swinging his double eyeglass before
suspected OF being the man of Intellect he really
y, as he has habit OF wearing his hat on the back
Of his head and. his manner is dazed and pre-
occupied. once in his sifk gown and hOrsehair
wig, however, there are lew men 80 prompt and
inelsve IN attack, so ready in reply He Is con- con,
called compensation casesn and receiyes en-
ormous ices, of which he is said to be more than
not d IN s rise
asked the sergeant, You can't take with 1 you
next to him, Is Mr.. Sergeant Parry a gentleman
and advocates se az the one a o. H.
never makes any particularly brilliant orations, he
never ELECTS the laughter of)he Court by humorous
lawyer and thorough gent man, and gets up his
cases in the most conscieI tlous manner and de.
votes all his energies to his clients.
The Indictmsnt-LegaS Statement of tho
Convfct's Life, Wanderincs and
Crime-Who Is ie.tis.
The following Is an exact copy OF the Indictment
preferred by the English Crown against the claim.
ant to the Tichborne estate. For the sake Of
brevity the designation of the defendant, is used
throughout in lieu OF the style and title under
which he was rndtcted-namely. "Thomas Castro
otherwise Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne
Baronet." There are no less than twenty.six
counts charging the defendant with various
offences Of perjury. The several counts, raising.
as they do, 80 many varied issues, show pretty
clearly the difhcultes with which DIR. Kenealy had
to contend, inasmuch as he had to attempt to
refute by evidence every one OF the points raised
by the prosecution. The indictment reads as fol-
lows:I
Some time ago, that is to say, on the 9Th Of April,
in the thiry-1fth year OF the reign OF our sover.
Of 0S Brau OF aaS ta
Queen Defender OF the Faith at the General SEES.
sion OF Oyer and rerminer OF our Lady the Queen,
holden for the jurisdiction OF the Central Criminal
Court at the Justice Hall, In the Old Bailey in the
suburbs OF the city OF London, before Justices OF
the Peace, 1t was presented as follows, that is to
Central Criminal Court to wit:-'The jurors for
our Lady the Queen upon unefr oath present that
Wit on the 10th day Of May, 1871 at westminster,
IN ir,,t the county Of Middesex, and within the
Sefore the Right Hone Seh'E Sir Wam S eSvni
Knight, Her Majesty's CHIEF Justice, assigned
to aoa psas au1 in on Her N
ment between the defendant in the said action,
and Franklin Washington and the Hon. Dame Te-
Hon. William Stourton Keniric Arundel, as guar.
dams OF Sir Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Itch
borne, Baronet an infant, as the defendant, came
to wit on the DAY ahd Year AFORESAID ids and on
divers other days afterwards and before the taking
behalf-to wit, at Westminster aforesaid~tried by
jury Of the said county IN that behalf duly sworn
Y try the matters in question in the said issue be.
wi tch trio tha
and and s' behalf Of himself "i So 6e n1s
action, and was then and thereto wit, by and
under his description duly sworn and took his
corporal oath upon the Holy Gospel Of God, before
the said Sir William BOvill, that the evidence
which he, the said defendant, should give to the
Court there and to the said jury sworn as afore
the said parties, should be the truth, the whole
truth and nothing but the truth, the said Sir Will
liam BOWL then having sufficient ana competent
authority to administer the said oath to him in
that behalf; and the jurors aforesaid on the oath
Aforesaid do further present that upon the trial of
aforesaid, and IN relation thereto the follow
ing questions respectively became and were
defendant, was Roger Charles Tichborne. eldest S
son of James Francis TchpOrne, ESQ.,, afterwards
Sir James Francis Doughty Tichborne, Baronet,
now deceased and whether the said defendant
had resided at Paris, In France, from the time Of
his birth until 1s45, and whether a person named
Adrien Chatillon had been tutor to him, and
whether the said defendant did in 1S45 come over
from France to England to attend the funeral OF
Sir Henry Tichborne, BarOnet, deceased, and
whether the defendant had been student at the
Jesuits' College, at Stonyhurst, in the county of
Lancaster; and whether the said defendant had
been an officer in her Majesty's Army; ana
whether IN July or August 1852, the defendant had
seen Lady Doughty, to wit, the Hon. Dame Cath
crime Doughty, then the wife of Sir Edward
Doughty, Baronet, and her daughter Catherine Mary
Elizabeth Doughty then spinster, and now the
wife OF Joseph Percval Pickf0rd Radcliffe, ESQ.,, in
the drawing room Of Tchborne House, in the
county of Southampton; and whether the defend
ant had, in July or August 1852 seduced the said
Catherine Mary Elizabeth Doughty, spinster now
the wife Of the said j. P. P. Radcliffe, Esq. and
whether the defendant had, after the ed June,
1852, and before March, 1858, seen the said Cath
crime Mary Elizabeth Doughty; and whether in
1852 the de fendant mad seen Miss Mary Haes SPIN
ster In the presence OF her mother or ner
aunt at Canterbury In Kent; and whether
the defendant had been at the house OF Uep.
tain and Mrs. Washington Hibbers, called 'sBilton
Grange;" and whether the defendant had ever
been to Loyd's rooms OF the Royal Exchange,
London; and whether the defendant was not
Arthur OrtOn the son Of George OrtOn OF Wap-
ping, deceased; and whether the defendant had
not Deen in Wrapping before 1885, and whether the
defendant had not gone by the name nj Arthur