, 1874-02-21

bonds,-S50, 600 and interest. The other dcclar
| atoms we're similar. all being On bonds.
/ It appears Gliundo that Guilds, the Prosiden
| Of the Riverside Company, represented to Pael
| and Kimbark that Is they were axay frequently
| it was necessary that releases should be ready
80 that If tho bonds we're paid they could b
| filed. They, therefore, execnted them and LEFT
them, and, in some unexplained manner, they
| were put On record without tho bonds being re-
deemed. This, it is claimed, is such gross ac'
! OF negligence on the part Of Page and Kimbarl
xs will render them liable, even though they
may not bo privy to any fraud.
THE TICE-AtETgR CASES.
About month ago u full account Was publish
| ed in Tue TRIBUNE Of tue settlement Of all but
! two OF the so-called :" Iice-Meter cases." One
| Of those remaining unsettled WAS that Of Simon
| and Adolph Nusbaum against Enoch Emery.
Farrell refused to hand over the money which
| it was claimed WAS paid to him by Emery, on ths
ground that he had never received any in this
| case. 4 rule WAS, therefore. issued on tho 3lst
J Of January against tho Nushaums and Emery, to
| show CAUSE why they should not pay over tho
! $4,000 deposited with Emery for Tees benefit.
! Yesterday Was the return day Of the rule, and
| the answer OF Adolpt and Simon Nusbaum was
! filed, which states that some time in 1860 their
| firm deposited q check fpr $4,000 With Eaocl1
Emery, the Collector, to pay for lice meter
when it should be properly placed in thoir dis
tillery. It never Wis put up, as the Revenue
Department subsequently prohibited the use Of
the Tice meter. Farrell, who bought up all the
claims OF the d1st1llers, having received the
check from Emery, delivered it to thesa Nus
bauns, and they delivered it back Immediately
to s. Pulsiter d Co., bankers. They. it seems,
had o1igi nally certified the check for the Nus
baums' accommodation, though the latter had no
money in the bank to their credit ut that time.
The check was, therefore, delivered back to
them to square the transaction. Simon and
unable to get The check again, though
they have aaked Pulsifcr j; Ca. to
give it up, but they refused.
The Nusbaums have since that time been un-
fortunate in business, and are now wholly un-
able TO rsise the $4,000. and therefore ask to
The caae will be brought up some future time
for hea.lng on this rule and answer.
THE PACIFIC HOTEL COMPANY.
4 supplemental bill was flel in tho case Of the
out that Pollax mas gone out Of office, and
makes Gen Leh and P, II. Clcary parties. Il
is also stated that since the filing Of she orgna!
bill the ta3es on couplainant's property
have been extended on the basis Of $685.
the State Board did not uac the rules made by
themselves, but gave the matter into the hands
of committee utterly unfamiliar with the value
of co1nplainant's property, aud that committee
simply adopted an estimate furnished it, and
1uAL N4EaE9 In preparing ~ Cpll6Et k41 S11u tA1,
aud therefore an injunction is necessary. II
was granted by Judge Williams for sixty days
under bond Tor 81 1000.
This waa the second case ever commenced
against the operations OF the State Board. 1t
was argued beforo Judge Williams, and ho has
the case still under adslsenens. Il Is expected
decision will bo given by the Supreme Court
very shortly, as other cases involving the Same
principle were heard before that Court last
month in Springfield.
Judge Williams waa further enlightened On the
subject Of the tepet8 Of the Episcopal Church,
aud tho difference between "Hgh'' aud
Low, }" BY the depositions Of DR.. Adams, DR..
Hopkins, DR.. Stocking, the Rev. Mr. Kinney,
and DR.. Morgan Dicks read in the Cheney case,
examination OF Dr.. Adams and Dr.. Hopkins
was especially brilliant aud amusing.
The following Is the doctrine OF the Episcopal
Church on the subject of infant baptism. "a de-
fined By DR.. Adams: Infants arc horn in
original Sin; therefore, they need regeneration,
and as regeneration takes'placo in baptism, aud
all who arc baptized are rcscncrated. except Of
their own will they put . bar against the work OF
all infants, therefore, Ia resenezated in
baptism, and are baptized in the Church for that
intent aud purpose" This, sIr- Fuller alleges,
Ia exactly synonymoua With the definition given
by the Church OF Rome.
Mr. Judd, on behalf OF the complainants, will
occupy about . day more With his evidence,
when Mr. Fuller Wlu introduce testimony on his
side.
ABAD susTAKE
Samuel +; Esan hieu hll IN the Circuit
Court yesterday against BELL Mann and Sam
uel Ray. to have mistake IN deed and trust
deed corrected; It appears that in Iarch. 1872.
complainant sold The cast 80 feet OF Sub-lot !,
q b!ock ~ 70 M Ei1is Mest Addition, to Een
mann 1or E!,ouo, xo9o cash. ana the remainder
secured by trust-aeed. M by a mistake the
Horda 20 a sthe east " test o. we're enitted, an AID
the deed conveyed the whole OF oub-lot l. The
- uas e9ee4 Wao 10y e1Aooo4o - o4141A1 1lat1-
ner. Compahnans asce1taln !, g tue error shortly
~ MteIWatus ~ ano aa1ed hen mann 20 au1tclalm
me Mest ~ 1eet (suo-io11 ha7lng oo feet frontl
ana AioW t9e msIase IN me trust deed 20 necof"
SaI tsesea a nu1 b1 he .nat ne had con-
seyeo tne "no1e n suo.lo' 20 samuel ray. Egan
states that hay 70 tho father-in~law Of Mann,
anu tn.t tne convey aneS u lSauou1ens. 20 h1nuet
Esan, IRON a eosxscsne n sno euos, or s1slns pos
eession . OF ne ~ 1eet asc1aonsaa1S decided: Af,
tne1eIore' aeslsss .os eouII, py . Master IN
Caancsly, 20 oecins tne apote oeeo Eola, or cor.
reg II 80 ~ To on19 convey 1ne eas1 ~ teee of
sa'o soa-o@