Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1874-01-12
EVENING STAR.
The Matrimonial raf~iicttlcs rs Psa-


B-f,~s .I..F 80 fsrrts. gisrf-fs az p--rh.-
a somewhat Psinful prominence has siJata
the psSf few months been gwen o. the domestic
Hfe o. the prina donna Psniire tuccA Hsr-
ing reached the court where ber go was Fe--
teTdSy tAe subject o. = protEacicd arg nment. "a
hss ptohstly stout reached the end o. IL legal
tcthsr. Tie facts Of the case admit OF yerr
briCf Summarizing. Nine ucCa. a. she Il pop
uis- y known, Nss msrried ou November -.
l-t5. IN Berlin. % Baron Ado,pa vOu Rhode
one daughter r. the irut 81 tho marriage. In
August, - ?, she came % th.s country, trinEing
her daughter With hcr. within = lev menth.
after her arrival she instituted rrocccsiincs
here Tor a uivoroe. ala on the "a Of IURs iasf
Judge fancLcT granted her a decree % At
voice, the stipulAtsOus In the decree eeias
that she shOald be allowed % rcmsrry. bat
that her divorced husband could not marry
again until after her desth. Too days sfteu
Won wsilbo;en. OF me proceeding for divorce
Baron Yea Rhode. Who Wss stiil hving n ser-
lin. c!slmea TO be ignorant until he .ag q Pars-
graph IN = newspaper snuo unCing the act. On
his side, application Wa made 20 - sside "a
decree, and this Jadge fan,her relr 81 % 10
An 81 yea v A. according y tsSyn 10 the eenef.A
term from the order made on THIS saphcstBs.
and Il VA upOa this appeal, A. also = orh-s
sPreai taken by plsinii 2. that sestefdsy's srgo-
men. took Vlact Her story is. ti4ai sitter Arrh.
i>lo, they lived separate hs nlu;usl C0nsenf.
step which she alleges IN her andavit -hs
Wss obliged 10 take by reason OF NJ "a g,teris.
snd eAtrsySgant hshits IA constantly tNk'sy
aud spending her money IA gambling ssa
riotCus living. lie dcciArt-, On The rontrsrF.
that they lived hsEmoniou-iy together arr
Emil Acu WsIlEoieu, sitcr being waundrf
al the battle OF NJ. Pf.s a., on August is. 1870
became An inmate of their hCI-e. lie sars hs
vas NOuuaed himself In she same battle, Bat
too uAngerCusiy TO lC taken EOile 4li some tfss
Afterwards, When Re found there 20 hts Ettsr
surprise, on Na.hOien. Ne denies, "a sub
stance All tie aicgHuo-s agaluSt hsIa. All
charge all tie trouble 10 the rival FOR ais ~
EreCIOt~. The only wifrr-- % sIfcs Nma
iucCa IA The divorce proceedings VS. COurNf
hesslcT. tie te>flheS 10 tie Bslous Ilacif to
umAcA with an actress A. one cf the geffis
theatres, 30 their frequent riding auf ,friving
IN public. 10 bis sending Eer boI.Ue+s and %
on, occasion Chfirt mas tree costing "a m .i.r.
tie winds NJ lis TESTIMONY 10y Chararter.s tss
the Baron rs a man - very dissipsieG habits. a.
drinking largely, - given Co high plsying ia
the Berlin q gbs aTJ j. making no secret 81 80
connection " m the actress reitrFed - Ihe
argument vAs ot peculiar technical CHAR
scter, and, like All SAGA ar mruts. ~
/ technicalties had reference msitly %
. irregularities IL procedure, bat O. Wa
insisted or her side that there we're none Of
/ The m iurt-iiCtiOnsi, and did not furnish any
ground for setting as.ie the decree of divorce
] A strong Teiut glrO urged in Nine Iucca : be
half Wa that undeT the code IL judgment %
divorce AGAINST = NONRESIDENT be regularly -
tanned, there l. no pOwe 20 open a. a. a matter
Of favor. ON the other hand u was insisted
I that the court below should have vacated the
! judgment, because q never obtained iurisdic-
tion over the defendant; because the order o.
/ reference was premsturely made, and that ths
| court below erred IN refusing 20 vacate the
! Judgment, because there was no evidence what
! ever produced 20 the court on which Il ceula
4 have been lawfully reviewed. MI. =. 4. Nash
] msde the argument for Nine. Luccs We -nii
| adhere 20 her professional name' and ey-t.1s-
] eruOr solomon on hphAI1 OF BARON Won i.h de
! At the conclusion ct the Argument Che caaft
took the paper, reserTing IT. decis.ou.T n