, 1874-05-14

Hon IeIiulern waB to tell NoRaa 4tat In did mi
asid aftor hm ihnt God il mnta a MN .Ao r. HIN
ng,, imnro liz heinveI +hnt ,tAo t'aa H.. - ;a1,,
wns rroat deal mora o anl s,n nn tllnn tnatt"a1 n
would hu for sotno tno to oomo .l Ind ND to iiaa
nerfeeions @ Of tod more tcyp a Son asp sno
Trof. Swug-Do Won thin1x Ai,om ,,od anv
missionary sooiot,on, or auy asyln,na n INV Kind
to lo; go;fifyy yy.[toawG,ir, God wifi ,.,. 49,. .
-thoro woro no hoathcn. fnng1tssr ~ and II s. ~
pla,iae on tho loft,1 e1"Ne 1''A "F'4 W
Tile prosecutor thon auotod from Tim sormon
ontitlod, Influence Of Democracy on 0hriatIatl
no standards v wo eorn yertios .r so,u an1 SGbo ho
maas,lred,-ttat lilo moral i1eas wars 1inile to
change. aud wero subject to tho lsy M inoident to
ho os1lahod It was that IF Proi s' swtng VIA %ss
bottor than hia pronol,ing-that lis orood wSs
bettor thau hia exnroaaiG,, ~ i. Thnv warn
doaling with tho expression Of It, bcoause 1t was
TINT which exercised influence. Tho speaker
then quoted passage, tho logical Inference
from whinlt ho said, was that Prot, Swing
dropped tho doctrines Of proaostlnation " and
Future puniBhnont,"
Awonn or ,vAor,nn
t. twos t,,o ,,~,s,..oo ~ H. n1',.
wbeti,er prof. g,yrp WAS ~ ,vou ynt /, n,oos oy
with tho ooufossion Of faith. md wl,ottnr. If
bytorian Church. lc should stIil ayo tho rict
to miplster at her altar. ond hn rcoocntza5 ns +,
coo nnd roar at"nsr II IL vid XII ,a ~ III
tho t;,"a e. asH'..j. ~ ~ Will t9t tl1eit!
.t', ~ s1Mlo N@a coming "en they would SOC, II
thoy tE M'a1..uu tnla, thas tnnV wore wrong; and
city would find their own INFLUENCE undormfnod
forrod to- Thoy romabarea nom Tia ay ns Of Of @ PoncI.
eIn eopeInhow, how, When waiting for tho long-loohed
!'a ~. G's6syn, pfesaea ~ s,ltora, she post
favorite, aud gaSo as hor excuse that sue " would
aoropt him whuu at,e should have t1nshed a cor
tain pioco Of tapeatry and how what eho woye
n the daytime sAe llnrsyoloa in tho night-t1no.
penolopo Of tlo daytime. ard Prof. Swing waz
tue petoopo Of tho night, They wore proaohng
tllo doctrines ho waa dacryiug, and plauting
themselves upon tue time-lonorod alalld-
sfda. s1 and ,, mstataiuing them In the face
them that 10 had drltted away from tilom aud,
by hls ulroitnass and tloxiblity OF Language, aud
Skill IN the arrangement Of his thoughts, por-
Auadoa his people that ho was still in sympathy
falth. The tltne was coming when they would
aoe that tho prosecution was right, and be would
whit contuty il necessary for his own yindiea-
tion. lsmileB OH the 1ett.1
Tl,o ninth Rnocincot;on wna t1,o, odvor.oa +,,
~ ptoe'o"oa ,:t'' "ao 'nou "u'oi'eo 'o'
rie sommomy H. rna w ~ aag % 70 tne ao
Trinity; aud l;as snoten s1Ittuy n tc onrinn nf
hg Trnlty ~ taught ~ tue standards Of tho prcsby
Hta .t !; unapen s M Of Fsth chap p Sec @
o mas II n" ny nstnn u an 1os a.,
noment he tJuss, haa utcreu our tsrtstat tiose e
which nn ean subject 10 exporonce are tho ioqtrnes
tlat ne Of draaaon ri1aa UP anu unitss its voico
Wh that Of sipa authority. The doctrines Of Chris
amlty aTS @ t9so which msy 70 tiled by tho human
e ca na o 10 OF ne ny as formally sat.
tho Of nor H. as y aroo 70
and peo Tint it IL good, Menee, Chriseuity nearss
readily the itlaa Of three oicea, md pernits the ono
God to appoar in Father, or III Son. or in spIr!t.''
Tile idoa that QUO could be three and thrco
could be ono ind been rtculoil by Prof. Swing.
and he had given his public approval Of a Modal
Trinity, which WAS not tho Trinity taught in tic
Confession OF Faith, the Trinity Of tic Bible or
Of tho Gospol. Thoy believed III QUO God,-tllat
WAS one factor in tho doctrine that the Father
waA God; that tho Son WAS God; that
tho Holy Glost was God that was
tho sooond faotor. The groat problem
q tue world OH tue question Of tla
~ Ithlty. waa 70 eo1noino theae Two taotora, aud
ira snuae Wolo IVY Ways ~ wnen IL oo1lo 10 oohe.
tot n1 oao ar, maa tsutn, anu tne ot1er Was orror