New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1874-12-15

COURT RECORD.
MONDAY, DECEMBER "a. 1874.

COURT RECORD.
MONDAY, DECEMBER u, 1874.
Supreme Ceurt.
Present-Justices Tsliaferro, WHY and
Morgan.
Justice Howell took his seat, but read NO
opinions.
The following cases were passed upon:
BY JUSTICE TALIAFERRO.
No. 3S47. N. p. Anderson Va. Blanchin
s. Giraud, appellants.-Ordinary cases may
be fixed for trial on the promiseory note
docket when there are not enough promis-
sory note cases to make up the number re-
anired by the act Of 1868. Judgment
affirmed.
No. 1857. j. J. O'Hara Vs. Henry Blood,
appellant.-Judgment affirmed.
No. 1862. Emily j. Robertson, appellant,
vs. C. S. Sauvinet ct al.-Judgment re-
versed.
No. 54O5. E. A. Deslonde ct al. vs.. State
National Bank, of New Orleans, appellant.
Appeal dismissed.
No. $500. Succession Of s. Marx.-Judg-
ment affirmed.
No. 1874. Henry F. Cottam va. G. H.
Smith & Co. ct al, appellants.-Judgment
affirmed.
No. 1870. George w. Bancker l. Co. vs..
John and Hugh Brady, Everett Lane & Co.,
appellants affirmed.
No. 1856. N. Tongue, appellant. vs. Louis
lana Levee Company.-J1dgment affirmed.
No. 5357. The State of Louisiana OK rel
Edward j. Gay VS.. the judge Of the Fifth
Judicial District Court ct al.-ApplicatiOn
for mandamus and prohibition refused.
No. 54O3. Powhatan WOOlridge vs. E.
Monteuse and NJ. S. Hedrick, interyenor
and appellant.-Judgment affirmed.
No. $3.50 Mrs. j. Armstrong vs. estate of
Eugene Philips, interdicted, appellant
From Second District Court On motion to
dismiss. Appeal dismissed.
No. 1924. Parker e. Co., for use, ETC., vs..
j. p. Harrison, Son 4 Co., appellant
From Sixth District Court. Judgment
affirmed.
BY JUSTICE wYLY.
No. 3548. 4. EsterbrOOk & A. Caller,
appellants, VS.. Mrs. NJ. E. Gauche-In
this case relief was attainable by appeal,
consequently an action of Dullity will not
lie. K. 523; g A. GAG; 6 A. 249: 6 A. 799;
A. 'eO3; IA A. 1896; % A. i46. Judgment
affirmed.
No. 1862. John T. Michel, appellant, ss.
Zurilla Meyer ct al.-Appeal maintained.
No. 3547. John s. and LOnise Skinner vs.
William c. Sibley ct al. appellants.-Ap.
peal m0l0C6l0oU.
No. 547S. State Of Louisiana OK rel. John
Calhoun, Administrator, vs. the Judge of
the Superior District Court and Thomas
Lynne- -Mandamus prayed for by defend
ant, Lynne. As the matter in dispute
largely exceeds $500, the constitutional
rights of relators to an appeal are main
tained. Mandamus made perempt0ry at
the cost of defendant, Thomas Lynne.
No. 39ll. John Cook We. Reynolds & Gar
ber, appellants.-Judgment affirmed, with
ten per cent damages for frivolous appeal.
No. 5l73. d. Landry vs.. Francois Victor,
appellant.-Judgmen: amended by striking
the cost Of the copy Of the act of mortgage
to 81 IS, and az amended affirmed.
No. 1916. L. E. Collins VS.. Charles Fox
and Imbau, AycOek & Coo appellants
Judgment affirmed.
No. 1920. The Hibernia Bank of New Or.
leans Vs. w. H. Waters and George Cronan,
appellants.-Julgment affirmed, with ten
pei cent damages for frivolous appeal.
No. 5467. Joseph Vigo Ss. A. E. Carloh,
administrator of the succession Of Etienne
Carlon, and individually. ct al, appellants,
Setting up in new suit the same cause Of
action is no ground to dismiss the first sui,
pending an appeal. Motion to dismiss ap
peal denied.
No. 52l5. Thomas Rhodes vs. succession
Of John Armstrong. appellant.-Appeal dis
No. S4of. P. S. Nugent vs. city of New
Orleans, appellant.-Judgment reduced to
$54Sl, TO be equally divided between
lothian Potter and John O'Rouke. and az
thus amended, judgment affirmed.
No. $3.50. Louis Stern g. Brothers ss. C.
G. Packard, ct al, Observation-Disclosures
affirmed. with ten per cent damages fol-
frivOlOu appeal.
No. 37O5. Nathan P. Rice vs. Joseph NJ
Howell, Francois N. Keller. Keller &
Co., appellants.-Judgment affirmed. with
ten per cent damages for frivolous appeal.
No. 1865. Anatole Cousin We. Thomas
Faucett. appellant.-ln an appeal from an
order of seizure and sale, the only inquiry
is, was there sufficient authentic evidence
before the judge to authorize the decree
Subsequent proceedings under the degree
can not be considered. There need not be
authentic evidence of the costs of the pro
test. 1t may be collected as part of the
costs. "a A., 3OS, 425; 25 A., 80. Judgment
affirmed, with ten per cent damages tor
frivolous appeal.
No. 1858. A. H. Gale l. Co. ~s. George w.
Doll. appellant.-Judgment affirmed.
No. 1914. Mrs. Widow +. L. CharbOnnet.
appellant, vs. Ed. Dupasseur and Jules
Vacheron, A. Rochereau. intervenor.-AP
peal dismissed.
No. SAL. Fred Kuhtz, appellant. ss. John
Baehr, sherif..-MotiOD 10 dismiss appeal
denied.
BY JUSTICE MORGAN.
No. 1858. Nancy Lockwood, tutriS, etc.
vs. E. A. Vented ct al, appellants.-Judg'
ment reversed.
No. 5l53. Peter Gassen vs.. Lue Beebe,
appellant.-Judgment reversed.
No. 1868. Bait 4 Michel VS.. city Of New
Orleans and d. +. Mapbells appellants
Judgment reversed.
No. 36OS. Oscar Blasco vs.. Frank Broom
ct al. appellants.-Judgmen reversed.
No. 370. Bank of America vs.. John B.
Howard. ppellant.-Judgment affirmed.
No. 3629. Richard G. Rawlings vs. Henry
J. Brinker, appellant.-Judgment affirmed
No. 1884. Steamboat Carrie Converse and
owners, appellants, VS.. Jacob Fetig ct all
Judgment affirmed.
No. 1912. John Page VS.. Nicholson Il Co..
ppellants.-Judgment reversed.
No: 543s: M. and J. Meagher, appellants
No. 1880. Central Savings Bank Vs. Ethel
e. Themas, appellants Judgment affirmed
with ten per cent damages for frivolous ap
peal.
No. $40. State ex rel. Ocean Dry Doci
Company vs. the Judge Of the Sixth Distric
COurt.-Petiti0n for mandamus dismissed
Superior Criminal Court.
INFORMATIONs FILED.
Carrying concealed weapons-Willtan
Carter, William White.
Robbery-Willis Pugh0 Louis jackson
Robert Williama
Embezzlelnent-Ben Monteguto
Shooting, etc.-Andrew Riley.
Burglary - IgDatio Santa Cruz ALA
Psjaera Verde. Manuela Ordeupa and An
tonic Perez.
ACQUITTED
John Sullivan, OF robbery
First District Courts
INFORMATIONS FILED.