, 1874-06-20
He Wants 100000 From
Those Gentlemen.
This Would Have Been Ills Share Of
tile Profits
II the Work Had Been Properly
Done.
Wicked Ways Of Defendants.

-, tt,o{
nothing moro would bo heard Of Doaolyor Il
that expectations wae in vain. Ohittondon do
,nands hearing no: betore tho ct tribunal Of pub.
Ito opinion. but boforo tue Cifosns CouEs OIL COOK
County. Ha Is not satisfied with tho trentnnett
rcooivc] At t,e 1,ande of hron5rs. DlcQlelaud and
Jenkins. and benco ho has roBort@G 10 htF' etorrs
VINO brought nim .ofen ~ '0u atoto
nenl ol oo"BIess'oilA1 'n'ea''s''"oAi s. o
ha aaso to the oeFt IN tho psas s,a "
u'o"'a1,''' y, pa.uos1e, "'''9' AA' ""A9"'
Tho eminent counsellor.
tAa pIonA'sA s,,
Rhieh Was hlca yesterday III as 1oRo"s:
George T. chittenden, plaintiff In thss suit by st%rTs
nd .sss and Gasss en' OF plea Of re'''' OF
For that whcrcas, heretofore to-wt On tho list day
of November H. D. 1911 ut, towit, the CITY Of Chica
60, 1n the county and State aforesaid by ccrtnn con-
fract In writing thin n1d hpte nadc 4nd entered Into
BY md between tho r1n!ntitt Of tho one
pars. and tic defendant. Nobcrt aIcCtoltnnd, nnd
no pm nso aud ys u Of s
other rnrt. aud which aaId contract the planin now
and year therein neunoued towlt, tic iay and your
aforesad,
. n.,s,r,,o NJ T T4s s;d AonEEn ar s5n, rad ,ao
takon to secnre conraets for street for
tho sad peolyer ecle]nnd fer % the s3tes M f.. eass ot
@ eonausaee viii viii ths oh,o ,i River liz sa Deaolser
ssre,mprons hsa WOO s T eTss aud ng
owning and H. shss bsess ia H. a. so
tHes eoeapd would nay y to ss ian I ia for ill., sssvces
IN procuring contracta in The aforesaid States for
aud for nil expense. incurred md
tho procuring Of the said contracts,
ONE .rnlnp or THE NET rnor1rs
ar5Bng from the completion or performance Of tho
contracts procured hy tho Ba{I ulQHU nfCfefa1t
And ii wns also further agreed by md between the
and by said contract, TINT, in order to determine the
PROFITS upon the CONTRACTS procured by said plaintiff as
labor, transportation aud o1penaca should 10 kept by
tho snfa Dcdolycr Mcosciiaud, aua tiat all moneys
received upon said contracts In cxccsa Of tho amount
suid oontrnct.
Aud tho aail plaintiff further tath that 4 was also
u sna sy sa a ~
#, t' se;ss f s s %
said Daoo]yer NsGelland, faet = the work upon
was paid for in tlu proportion Of onethr 10 tho said
raintlI, aud two-thirdb TO tho said Doeo'yer Nc
Aud tho eaid plaintiff further Rath TINT 1t In aud
by siu coutr.ct 10 inae 1A entered into aforesaid,
further understood and agreed By and hewesn lu sad
hFon ho procuring + ths contrasts tor street mR.oys
tic performance thereof and was TO b e1onrrnted
from giving atty further attention thereto, and that
be sai1 contracts procured by the said paintf tor
lho Ha.d DsOolyer McCielland, as aforesaid. were
10 10 carrle1 on aud completed by
the said Deaolyer + McClellanu In d
1rst-cass and workn!annke manner. Aud the said
plaintiff turt9er say. hat upon the execution ana Dc
a performance thereof hia part and did nt tho
qnest Of the snd ,s ssca t neFsas Dc so
Works Of the District Of Columbia for laying 2uOOoo
square yurds Of wooaen psven,ent
of tho patent known "a the 0DcuoIyor No. a. tho
wood to be treated by ths sam9s!s proeeEs, pa,snt
aud. ''~>
And tho plaintin further ssys that in performsnee
etnnco aid request Of said Detolyer acCeiunu, 40
pforosaid he did secure from tic Board Of Public
Works, District Of Columbia aforesaid, aasuranco
10 coutrnct with tha said po3olyer l. btcCleand for
lny1nK square ynrtlB Of wooden payemenss OF
The patent known aB tho "DeGolyor No. q" Wood to
hn irnatei hy the Enmuels proeeas on such streets as
might 10 designated IL tho City Of Washington by tie