, 1874-08-12
General Belief that tho Court VIII
Decline Jurisdiction.
Pooling Arrangements Of the
:. Cincinnati Roads to
Continue.
Miscellaneous Items.
THE WISCONSIN LAW.
Special pitpatch to Tho Chicago IribNHd>

fohde. Dy cltat1on8 from tho conssltutlona oi
other stotcs, ho showed that tllo Jurisdiction Of
| the Euprepae Court In caao Of Injunction
,rna m indo0nitolv expressod na IN
~ ,v,aao,n,, t,ons.,t,t,,,7 ,rd h., r,,1,. oa
sao "1s'oinn eonas.'nno'', 1'..". anu, .a'snk1
OF tho various supreme courts, pto'oa .l'as !neY
! nover had takon original Jurisdiction OF m In
| junction. Tho dofondantH desired tho Court to
! doc,3o t1,a onoation .yhother thu aenora, Rail.
! ~.s, -. .,,a.x ,,,;,,, .o.,.t -.....>..,,..
toa" & iam nnn,,oH nn4oia ao,.,5 Leens - 1onau,ea
nsu ooem neat,,,t .tuAa ~ anan1ou ge..
H., "poS. pn.t.~ ~. ~ ~ .ra.'i, am
stp,,,a.s, a. tl'a W:,-. .i.a ,ou4ta aiao 'o
oprt ,'oa aa,.oI H. aa,se 1vt,, no a,o
,n}"nctnn nam", nnonp thn Viii .p.1,I, i,n nae
,nsn - ~ G,nrn.,,s sre+ .A'19 "ssu .a, ~
as ~ .u ,, ,,,nra to, IL % t ne
,u .rs ~ ~ t'rr .aa sooo . H. ~
s9rae rn} Il i liz an,na Cnsituto m''n asn,' .o
e e. 1nown that sves, Ell" trr m@ver ~aa rnara
vi ibavo,so -, @iie na"t;,n,n. -o-,a,,,,x,., H.,
Da..n ~ ~ Ru9 Raitt ea To- teEaau8 .no
,,niosa y nnosa " ia iam Sau
! G.9 t31 11. m ~ eo.otnt ApttUo ~
ation Of so pn9;'9 e. Iha statute has
sefna ,o;t IL ratas n,oronI ~ ~ ,y. nt us-
satasa ,.;snd VIII ~ tason an a nows ot any
anti for IT," ,,nna1iaa' vot lI,roualouf ,ho Rtntas
t,rnr ro~ cvv>, s,<,,,,,x.>,,, r,.-7 ..,r,
y ~, nof nnnS ~ soarlSIs T.
H. fovor ~ Ths M faot IL cnn,,,ea,,t ~
plo Of tic STATE Who. though tbov NAV be- be- con-
}t,nj9
sa.,ccr rstca are ec,at,y yee't'snaaa1 pt.st
ssnsot sHto" NV euMaiS "ou.sat1nauu taat
sro ur1ws ,, t,a n.nnlo arr to- ha,;nrat,a ~ =,
dasire that the railroas sal carry w At loss. In
w. T. tn'a guuu.at 4a' au1uus, anu tao uo9ot1ut
jurisdiction & o. tlo CouIt' N H. was no compliment
~ a5 To n.sas .n's o,, ouS ia p9S VI
tae ne9s " a"o.nae wy, %nsS aisat hsYe osen
pss ~ meAaig IL 4Gslea nona tao d,s-
.nr ~ "a Il % '5 e nv W. asesssou py
t & nw a s.,t wy co s
M M s,, W. ~ % su,.' opos
WV ""ts' ~ p.opt.! ,s,. anu5 rou '.1. oPo'oAS
. H. o,,1a Nj, I'm na,,oat r. nfxs. @ NJ x.
tha oap " G n ond III IA "nu ~ ,oo "p
tIo tre ~ ,n ny dpn"i; oram. au tnot sa1
tiis maftar NJ t IL will ;neot1 b ort,tei ~
ito approSaion q Iis Country H. t1on an m
Il L. aaortalv nocosaar ~ nro4n1t ao,o
nrea .t1s ssiat ~ aotuu aIf"
oorcd for iasnr ma n c,sa ore ta ~ on1v 1v
nosae W efocs Vii 10 to nroc" sMh1 M m @
;ur of ~ .hn nertv dst;aa ~ ~ - o ~
one AGAINST whom It iasi,ea aAs 4o' ~ ''40 'u'
tornr"tatjon ~ ti,s rortroct bot~nane +Ea stat.
and tlo that It Is not covarod @ Nv
as 1rci aitara ~ ronaaa II - ~ ~
ns,i;ro,;o., ~ thn .onfraat rIet tae a
~ S~~rnn,a Ga,rt ~ ~ t1,';t"a a.njna t;aa -;
terfero tor % WITH M tle subject; II :; ' ''''' ~ a.
;aio11s ~ .o nanatitmt;om " H. 'an gto
ststas ca,no " ;.to a1idnat;n,, +t " si tat
Snnrnmn % Gonrt i,aH inr;edction & % Tio etaseo caso
1uas ,npe envvoy n frnn, nmnIor frh,nn1 e'so
""n ,d1n ~ sunrao nn,aLt =. .,
,4of atstaa t.Lo ~ ,s;."ta,' " fn, s.to
this rntr ~ fic i,,tensIo W III atsta
Constitution? - SAs' '$''>'
Hem smit-Not nocosaor;,v. bnt rva tb,n,,
thcw c,n IN o+har mas t;onu ;nvoI',o5 l., ti';a
casa Wi, a nnwerfnI arros.omant If thn foiiv
~ tho attomnt ~ doa;rnv ia nns i,y H.
| forciro thom ~ onor"to IT. n 1oss can sn,;tH
cnuclIialej tho arrnment for tin ra;lwnvs nj
~" tas.srtsT f sTsronsrv.1rsrp.7,, n s,o,w
m haaIf nc ti,n statn hn1on t1n c1oaing o,.o,,.
| 1nont in tla ease. 1}ocinni,,c viii n c,,rs6ry
royiox of III tho 'p nrprmonla On boaIf Of tho
dofan.o ho utorti ttafanod +ho axarc;so I, ~ ~
tha rnsarrod nowo1 voateI IN tha Toriaiotnro.
Tho CLAIM, Of defondants counsel tlnt The rail.
| ronds woro essential to tho people. proyed tloy
were @ monopolics, mont lilo w uowor wpff Of 5etorminiur @
1'o,s ,nnot r. H. r-,,;tu - ;ninutr, stnid iSS
t"fa into ia soffaa ~ 10 r,nnnnofias ,,,,at ia
sn,a,haso 'no ua toiiroa 10y 9
env 1nvs aol,,a,, ~ amv mnra r. ho tr,,ato1 thon
ntjor ~ ern rnen II ~ was ~ tnrotorn wiaev nroyad it'd
taS ~, ,,,,ro oton 1'o ,o1, ~ WIFI avo,
sn ia nr;aiafr" i'aa o',oI1v IL ro,,1as"
at;ra ~ ~ an1o o,,S o ta
o nsu 80 ~ XII, "ia ta,, nv ' ~e
po"o' "an loasoa % VIA tnsnl. ~, 1onllMs 70
! H.. rn,,f TIE QUESTION OF 1qh1sn}ic1loN, ~ si}
| 1onna any precise pfeceaonss 70 SUPPORT his
petition: a. Ihe Court had looked diligently aud
could Ind no cqeos g, where injunction was eyer
iasmoa wasaoMs pli u petaioh Isas'nE ~ ,2r sho
iasnaneo 81 tn tue . VIII. o subject o. the 5uris
asotloh o. tne oou.t nolns 4scMssea ~ tae Po
I.!on ,,s ": s;oau uIEoa t.. tnnt 'no e"ist'ta1on
| gave 1ufisalotlon 70 t1o Court: ,.
| Judga Nyan-Iho Constltaf'on cannot impose
| imposalolo tnnEs upon tno courg; how eau
this or any other tollft hear anu detefnine
the writ q Injunction NJ It existed at
t!o timo thls constitution @ vas maao Wo eau
near ana determine Wflta o. quo "arlhhto. h1-
paas corpus mandamus caTtl9Tasi, anu Of pro.
nnltlon. though nol named; we can near and
aetormino .hoso g. wrlta, 6ut now can any eonrs
Understanding tho word in1nnGron 90 used III
lho aof!so III winch u ii used III isnEhsh )hrlspfu.
oeaeo. near alld aoteEmlne wrlt or 1nlincsion
.,,nt nt.yE..oon. H. n!oan-dl does not slrko mo
enal the phraso ~ the CONSTITUTION 70 any more
ntsao.o ',a 10 nearinB anu oetelialnlnk tho Wtls
H. a1o ,Dr;t Waf1anto any more .han ne
luz wIlt Q! Injunction. Yo4 really hear tue
snnIacs a,, M 1aatser OF tue writ. eennot see Why
wv utny IL 'aot tloar ahu aoteffnha Wflt OF in
Ju1osun ,dua ns ~ VOL as WITT OF quo Waffanto.
:, ynnsG t aasan!s sho operati9n OF tlat phrase
r,rt t wgs'tua!on tinh GlF1nE ehta one Wfi 70 TUG
nv; M mteM e,oas mGvef neIoro was 1nfaalctlonal
VIII mtit ,h ,nI,a g'asa.ns IL WIN namner OF other
%ioa 81 "Sfe taaaetonai Wsata ana arc
mmn t%a rr;t ~ r .a erect or that praao to
Attnrna rauan ~ "1Glon 1nI1HaeI'onal WIZ
A'tutHoy.u y.ueAeiAl,-Uslaouptealy, l think, III