, 1874-12-06

,oaneu the defendant. either to moo. notes Or
lay interest Oh its iuortg:se bonds
nA!iKRU7TcY 1T1;sss.
Joha toice and George L. Voice, eash, door,
a1u lnna manufacturers at 9G7 to 371 Seds-
H.sa street, nnd2r the iirm name OF John yo,ea
q soh' hled voluntary petition. Tic papers
naye been taken away, end the liabilities can
1os be stated.
john c: Dunlap. harness dealer Mt {su!esbnrE,
ESQ nlea petition to tako tho benefit OF the
cSse'e.
William II. Halleday finds himself unable to
pay bis creditors in full, ind joined the army Of
Dan'sruEss Ills lstiltics aro eI1, 3CO a,1d 1is
m,ss aSso,s are noihinE beyond what ere exempt.
These cases were all referred to the Register.
The Assignee Of the Coan d. Ten Droccke
Carriage Manufacturing Company filed his ra-
port ot tho sa!e OF the Company'a factory, on
Randolph and Am streets. foe $3.50 above iii in-
ca.nhranccs. Also lis report of tha salo Of
sosae small lots, and debts, and claims. Tho re-
ports Will be approved unless objections ore filed
By Saturday morning next
THO proceedings against Edward Higgins were
disr.l:sed o., consont Of his creditors.
Il discharge was Issued 10 Eetay EoIrin.
SUPERIOR COURT n DulEv.
Il. y. McGraw began a suit for IS. .O10 acainss
the Mechanics & Traders Insurance Conspuay,
Of New IorE, another for eI,CUo against Ito
Alereantllo Mutual Insurance Company, Of Now
York, aud th!r1 for $1,000 against the Orient
Thonan3 Laxear l. Hayden aucd lra Holmes
for S2,CD0.
J: S: sahcrton brought suit for 81, 500 against
e. l.. Eppa a..d T. I. Greer.
Thorpe, " i. Knox. +. e. Owsloy. .'D. ueatoa.
L. II. ReEott and William Mayor, asking for
mochanic'a lien to tho amount ct 5l.123.37, on
Lots Is. 16, Il, and tho north ) feet OF Lot II,
Block 2. Of Cwelcys Subdivision OF tho E Il OF
the z Is Of the n Is of tho n " u OF Soc. Is,
49, II, and tie buildings thereon.
CIRCUIT COURT.
Gustav Ludwig hogan a suit in trcsDass
against Theodore Fioller claiming 81, 900.
a. Il: Powers brought suit ior 81, ,0v0 ngainst
Sarah Broad.
CRIMINAL COURT.
Tnc last official act Of alr. William 4. Hocd
Bai1lI ct tho Criminal Court, WAS to servo the
following panel ior Grand Jurors, rcturnnble to-
morrow morning. at tho convon'ng Of tho Do
cember term, wish Judge Tree on tho l:ench:
L. +. nioktorl, John McLa,cn, c. T. White, G.
H. hobert8, II. II. Goodrich, William Muller. j,
T. Skeele, Z. 3. Hill, VI. 0. Carpenter, William
nlccnllem, John cArtis. 4. G. Van sclaick, A,
D. Even, D. ". Hccsbie I. Goodnow, j. L.
Higgic. +. Il. Hubbald. J. v Tay!cr, L. L.
hlelTill. 3. T. Demlug, James CLaEhloy, Joseph
Ellacott. S. S. Nutting.
TIE CALI
JUDGE DLopaErr-To cl.d of calendar.
JUDGE G.Ey-1 to 90 new calendar, No. l.
JrDos Mc1lonEnTs-l to 20; now calendar,
No. 2.
JUDGE RoGERs-l4014 to LEO. '
JUDGE Doeru-92.to 10l
JCDdE FARwELL-7t to so.
JUDGMENTS.
UNITED STATES CIsourr coUAr-JUDaE BLoDoErr
ID. Z. 1uGsun Town OF Lending, u, ,coO.-S:zte
Central Bank Of Nebraska VS.. J. L. Bowen. $110I Co.,
j. ?. Field ct nj. vp. N. S. Cushing ct al; Verdict
s50ll II. aud motion for tral.-Mowry Car and
Wheel Works vs. Rockford, Ro:k Island Pacific
Railroad Company, 93-Sfu:e Central 13=nk Of
kebrs ka NaslufaCturers' National Bank Of Chi
cgo, S2.1o1 0o-NcwarE Swings institution rs. G. Il.
Force and II. II. IT. Cus;...is1, SCI. 6.so-Fer,v
Bro. .. r. Downing. sS2.Gs.-J. J. Shrynck vs.
Chicago, Dauvllle s Ninceupea Railroad Company,
s;33.T9.
SUPERIOR ocnT-CoyrHss1oNs.-H. J. Chrtetoph !
"a Jacob 1lumu, s77.57.-pesvr peyp W, Catherine
und Frederick Bu-llards, St,U'G.Y4.-
Ansaham steEnhem ". Fran. Newman and Joh2aua |
Newman, S1l5.-Cnarles Lehman Vi. leter Duwney,
:l74.15.-Aibers Feiseathal Jacob WertAu1us7, |
!, 1866
JUDGE uAET-W. F. Coolbaagh ct a. VS. W. F. and |
J. J. Meyhoa aud L. 3. Ewing, Sl,400.-Same VI. !
Same. SsU0.
JrDoE A{clonEnTs-Ch7tstorh Moatngnr vz. Es- |
ate Of Corneius F. Backls verdict, sio6 and motion
or new trial.
C1HcCr1 CoCRT-IupGE EoGEEs-Chaflcs Gus!aysen |
5. t.rchiEald ca1nphel!, s5+.tl.
JUDGE HEAros-S. A. Tclluan ct al. vs. II. Gilman.
753.-W. L. Ellis ct III. Charles z Kay, $4l2.31-
Vlilard Meacha1n vs.. Hugh 6ometa: verdict, SS4.2o
nd motion for new trial.