The Stark County Democrat. [volume] (Canton, Ohio) 1833-1912, 1874-02-12

- TIHl
agalnst hasteand improper Legislation, It
Is important thatwe should retain it as
| reported from thS Committee of the
| Whole 1t was teo often The case in the
bQeneral Assem- ~ as in City Government
| that measp res seemingly of minor impor-
| tRnces but inltruth h1shg with. .H'evl .eense-
q1Snees 20 the people, skitfully senein-
eered wit ttraoting notice or com
nHent ss Ssre = prefented 70 ,ayote and pass
Mr., Horton, of Portage; followed in op-
POSITION to-the veto msasnres and sad It
Hatta5E vsEy hstls'40ns " hat may be the
history Of the veto sPewsFa hence 1t SFig7
lnaleds or Mhat- -4ioVerRments- may have
adopted and use6hft.2 4Fcrs several years
thePsoPteaofi0hI0 have had a Govern
ment they lhavea ProspsTed
and 'Aoullshsd without Il, & And the. pfairsi
ticsl qeshoA now Presented to Vslss does
ut furnlsh = remedy for any ills, or guard
agairet and dSEg Egerpte aEhIch the SsSteIs
sGblsct2l The bRrdensToE dRhoEingu
srsslslon th0ssaEhe propose the change .y;aIl
IudgS u 6adiy az sn an oa ! DIVISION of
Mr. ID ueiier. is0ff of . Enyahos 80 .
AZ gainst The veto ilrIneipls. as.em6odieds & il
t1erePcr6 o41tnltte ttesssassa e1sst % + :
Prs y 9s = SD 8 N as s5Yery
s1ngnlan remaED t9oome faohaethe sgeHtas-
man from lee st 1 ths veto 60 81
ressatp s12Sty 1eg3slatlOnss II lhsi had 0al6
thatsthelVstoopgwef might some va
inOpsf ttys,t3 3fa5n, s1ch1 leglst stisa
thekalWpulG kRDeb6splsomsSlfOF lfOFOsoinpt he
pfOpesltio ficts 81
the leg Si6lafure ch3GlTSed Slzaa asTsFyilz lzoo1
and mhsGan6EE md II5IL tEs belief tbsEs
ball 90 considered Was m9tursiY- cUnsid-
cred. .S0EsON bEoA
Il Nm. GAmphell-s.Ef thess 06VsEuora must
hA{s Nst5si Why NOT 3 hiln
seve9 tAenz 1otRa at oneRe and 1et Ihlm,S easI
then 1iaI86etlyi sGolE bs0I 'ianoo = ~ sasazalsi
il1 se dom T., propose oSs. - sgE
/ Ming sliked dhatysEssae s9aed.
+ Mt !,a effest s!Ig5I Pc TIE
saEae AA 4V7pg bun aseVenteen 2o1eals saH
ME DOIOey@SNetat q S1ls 1tAR Ito ears
~ ovSF -hiA hes a. afis atlFe, lthe byoEaptaEz
cdnseut men above q ma3of4-
kay In the -HeRse.--
~, ~ YestTff the original veterTpaasipe
- bItt afierWsfd vetoed obtained two
/ H,Tds of both Houses, what better would
| y4uUeaBe be hksnby the ptanI PROPOSED BY
/ Mr1PFv5tda IgiaBoo Szsi5 -h0iHa5 fiidll s5III :
7Sdge Hoadi Wv IS',s aI worse Sse s5 Ronld 1t
Sc fsldt sad -Isaoq 1s'Ev yo asFtI' e .i-t-i n
M said fkaatt L. had sbesnl silis SAID
tha4slk cvasneasieEt0 0aeorfuPtz tzthe Governor
than tp e6Tupt "a of TIE gisla7
ture, SSH Bes5RAEG "a Ipn0Elde against adj
the eYjls that ara incident IN Dur govern
Fhent because Of Bad morals which asemez
tine got hold of the rama
Ia Mr. Pease. Of Stark comfy. made 2
!, ,Apeee6, 81 RiAg4 t6sl AtisS 4es1 Of the Posf-
4 ton, of The Convention si upon the Eeto
qSeaIOHa afOresba doWih 80 &c speak 7 the
result Of the vote to- lhs EN- upon IT,
kthent he 1aRachedaf fuIl1 ol0ngEh > into an
zsrgument d 4npp6Eso Of the veto power
and Ekinst BE sdRhbS6 tRtei iofered. by Mr..
Camphelk LGAFssReape argued sithatE the
Eeto1Pe e.: Fed stal Gey ysfnnsnI
i had beenaafp teotlonsecond Only ystoi that
of thgS SeHss tuti6p tAsiif; and ~ ssK Ksfsiss
had-opet the popnlaFIaapproFal.y sa1Re
l GovsSnoPlby 4he7Nise exercise Of this pow
j er might ae ys the evils of unconsti5
I tutioaaf leeisia tionl-ssIt was the regretted
the ns9R f by yta st ths State IthSt ! The the
/ to5nraPiaionl had anstII been- lngfafted IN
the oidoG0nssitd = = - l1s.,,i'i Hsgis
T Mr.. Cunningham, of Allen, would make
the 0uESEaQE IlaIihass saPlG,-ths5f
1 1representatiHetq eZereisB5s fESctiGnaOf the
reserved power Of the people.
| MFJohns0aToFAa OF AanlItoaJ tkought elec-
| tink q man Governor did not maxi, him
AM WISER IN vas before. Ths4 s4etd
/ wal 80 Ii u BE1t {. I'd Z
1bdU ne, Il |Vanis - ikasSsI {
] po1er were secured by NJ CAmpbelPs
i substitute.
Mr. Baber, of franklin, arose to cor
kaeck the truth Of history. While the veto
I5o5sr was ingrafted in the Federal Con-
4 tttitatlon the safathsla sofl the seepntIy did
! not show favor to it in the State ConstitC-
/ stitutions. Most of the original thirteen
States had either no veto at ali or had a
vetO sub beOt1tp5 reYsrsslS bER naielty
vote. He Remembered when boy IN
Virginia of hearing how bills were passed
by the Legislature of Pennsylvania, and
then held in suspense uRtil the Governor
was ESSP sIgn ht. Z Honey : ss4s y
] hat he Governor of Virginia had no
Vsto power, and never was dIsgraced by
such proceeding. Mr.. Baber thought
4 that if after seventy years0 Lying without
"a veto power this principle was ingrafted
lin The Constitution the people Of Ohio
CoStss { * tdiS fSeS wi@ hE 1shP-
ssubstitute under eonsidefatlon.
Convention met, President King In the
Chair. eighty three members present.
RIaysS y Rsy. " : IBSlsiF. & IPpdfi= IPpdfi
j liJsurnal read spa Apprezed- IL 4
In BURINEss REsUNED.
EsaaJebate on Mr. Campbell's proposition
IS a substtnte for seet ipAl4 aslgbLesp of the
\ jLlkeislative article was resumed
/ Mr.. Coats opposed the veto because the
4 State had for three score and ten and two
I years prusnn6l diEhDaB H8 elessins 3 .Gik56
| might take the diluted portion offered by
| Nv iCannnhan Tha princinla WAS anti