The New York herald., 1874-07-27

snow the anectlOn sne bore you at that time, al
then you say that IN 1870 you thought you dlscOv-
cred that her mind was absorbed IN Mr.. Beecher
to too great an extent. Between the beginning Of
1868 and the spring OF 1870 had there been any act
on your part calculated to disturb the happiness
OF your home or ALLEVIATE the affections OF your
wileY A. Not that remember.
q. Had there been no affection Of q marked
character existing between you and another lady
which was calculated to disturb the happiness Of a
wilep A. No, think not
Here followed series OF circumstantia ingui.
ries concerning Mr. TiltOns relations with diner
ent women, and equally circumstantial deniais on
his part OF anything improper, or OF any c0nnec-
ment from him.1
q. DO you know that - made charges against
you, and that that was one OF the reasons why Mr..
Bowen discharged your A. cannot say what
operated on MIR. Bowen.
o. That was one Of the things discussed was it
notS A. Yes, the only thing discussed; but, Mr..
Tracy, decline this examination; you have in
sequences; there are charges against one OF the
names: took pains 10 introduce no names; there
are written charges mace ana MED concerning
lady whom you lave named; now, do not take
the responsibility Of reviving it.
General Tracy-We have to mention names here,
but think they won't be mentioned In the record.
z. What was the character OF the charges tnat
- made against your A. never knew that
- made any until afterwards; Mr.. Bowen said
there had been story told prejudical to me; he
would not tell me by whom, and he would not tell
me the story; said, "f there Is any story prejn-
face TO lace with me @ ~ MI Boweo weo ,.s sa me ss3ry
fair" after that heard that she wrote letter
q. Was there any other lady that was in the
haoit OF seeing you at your houseY A. II there
was, do you suppose / would be little enough, as
a gentleman, to name It? | am not a minister.
General Tracy-Then perhaps you might men,
tion itY A. should not; there are ladies' that
know and honor and l should scorn to answer
such question.
q. asked you whether there were any other la
dies who were In the habit OF visiting your house,
and whose visits disturbed the quiet and happiness
of your wife ? A. You may ask her and take her
answer; scOrn to answer; Elizabeth shall have
the benefit OF any statement she pleases to make
concerning any names; this examination under
stand the point OF perfectly well; there is no wo-
man that l have respected or honored whom
nave not brought To my house, whlch Is not the
practice always OF men in their relations with Ia
dies; II Elizabeth has been troubled concerning
my attentions to any lady take her testimony upon
that subject.
General Tracy-T will do that, and shall DO IL,
because you have brought into the controversy
the character OF your home; you ave said that
her affections were aenated, and It IS proper ana
essential that we should show that That was not
the cause to which you attributed IT,
Mr.. TiItOn--l say tf Elizabeth's change or mind
was due in her opinion to the tact that had loves
and affections for other ladies, take her testimony
for that tact; will not deny her.
o. You are confident she will state the truth OF
that A. She Will state what she wants to have
appear, anu that she Is welcome TO.
By Mr.. Hll-Won't YOU say generally whether