New-York tribune., 1874-05-18

decline to the ground that Banborn had ho'
requested you to do sol A. Not exactly as you put W
but claim general proposition that 1t would haruy
be proper for TO unless with the consent Oh
at the request OF my client.
Judge Woodbridge, counsel for sanborn. who was IN
the room. asked to put in word, but Represenlao
Beck objected 10 his being heard.
Pending the examination Of the witness, the wthe'''
in further answer questions said $4,000 or soep ao
dtona 10 the $4,000 came into his hands from Sahoor
at sundry times He doubted whether at at any ohe he
remembered being in Boston when sanborn paid nun nun
81 Oo he was his office; he thought the ihoneS
sanborn receipt part OF this money was for personal
services. but he thought not all Of It, 49,. ,,orov
A. 1t HSy have all been used for personal expense, ~
may soi have been used do not know tha Da'0
useipt for anyt ,Ing; never keep books. .
a. And vet you veceived from sanborn $4,000 IN yea,
and half wneNs repeated that when he receiSsiu IN
the 5000 TO which reference Is above made hs orn
the Adams Express ONCE; he went there 10 see Sanool
he made request for money both for his services anu
expenses sw TI ar of he did yo.receve previous
This $1,000 a. cannot e perhaps 5000 or RsSSted sgd
$4,000 but he said. Take this imuch, ana he gave o
the $1,000 ~ -, ,,,o thing,
in yoN bead. A. Perhaps moi, II do not carry '1'"
o. Where did Won lodge this information, then abont
the s.sOOOi A. / kept no books II was my genera,
COURSE If man asked TO attend to case ana ur @
so would receive from him my fee Oh "oulu senu '
client bill for services rendered. .- ~or
@ Do YOU say that in the transactions between you
and Sanborn not "A scrap OF paperf A. 40 ~.
know of any papers; far as am concerned no'ei
kept any accounts. l.. -ho,,
Witness was asked the names OF the persons 10 Wnoln
he paid the money but ho begged 10 he excused l1In
answering on ground of confidential reatl uc
tween client and attorney; lie had no DOUBT hoWSNoi'
that he recoected the names and the amounts pau.
Mr. Dawes addressing himself to Judge ao
counsel for sanbOrnQ DO you consent that the WITNESS
shall answer the question Judge Woodbridge 90 not
under the circumstances, without being aiio"eu W
explain ... 1. .-,o,,
O. Ito the witness)-Of the sum Of $4,000, to wnon ,
were yOu accountable for It's disbursement When so
received it a. received 1t as part OF tilc M
specific purposes SanbOrn never called upon me 10
der an account; presume he knew what use mao ~
the money: have received from him large sums u
money for conf ientia purposes, Dut, as his ia"'0'
cannot tell Tor what . .,o-,,.
Mr. Beck then read the following from Mr.. sanboFhs
testimony: $4,000, =. y ,
20 State more definitely the item OF $4,000 TO /. a.
Prescott for legal services, expenses. ana
state the OF the disbursements ana expenses anu
10 whom made. a. (Dy Mr.. Sdnb0rnl. lie pali IOr lor
nation gave hun. much money Tor MS own cApeHseS'
and then he has paid others. ,.. .,o
20 Have you had detailed report from him as 10 tne
amount which he paid A. No. Sir; | presume how
ever, that he make the statement" -.
Mr.. Beck now asked Mr. PrescOtt-Does not thls glN9
you consent TO \. No. unless MI Sdnboih sau
5 direct in person to me. ,,,,o,,
The Committee then Gjourned until 10 o'clock Moheay
morning, Mr. Dawes requesting MI Prescott 10 sec d'
sauUOIn subject.