The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-03-11

among other things c The Erie Railroad had been
had Eris Rsro SS' eGmpSn
anS Ssen had
neSwspapers on sannorp in order to repealed
Ne ssss M
he Mr Beck had referred to hun connection with the
Mr. BufGRa"By no means. On the contrary. I thank
the gentleman from Kentucky for giving the oppor-
Mr. Bsck-I certainly have never connected the gen.
there there Is anything on earth that apparent it that
nee from tner inception to the present time,
surLiR ssILrcosx.
Esary Of The aadasn sPpsHdi@s hss
ANYBODY who has Been called apo to yos that he
did not owe will beg his pardon beg pardon OF the
Iaurhter) ! stand here to be frightened BY hard
single word what have sa w fa Be fsay
MN Mr. unasT any resp would
not have been more IN cons9nanee with republican
moved The ocers who tailed 10 do their duty and put in
their stead good men who would have executed the law
Mr. BUTLER replied that the Question was in effect.
s "S 'sr I to
ad bS en n s and would have been
Mr. S Of ohG ne Rs The on
under report about the sanSorn Contract had
been made he was also authori1ed BY the Committee
lie undertook say that three Ourths Of ali the coec
BY. the ordinary Internal revenue officers
Mr. HAwns gen. d Conn., related the case Of George
pressure paid back taxes under this san6orn contract
and ss he
SS he aS S Ss Tn law might be just
=. BLAckMAILING.
Mr. BUTLER was glad TO have one case specified, and
der who mad not paid his taxes who alter having
tracts Il mad net been charged that penalties had
Butler aed to see it. xxi had wTonsu s PAID
Ss e s. nsa Sy the
supposed they had NOT got over their scare yet
seussion now &oicss 90 S5s oa against '''
M o Of 9 hi sa that Of the had
oes as
Sss Sss5sa j. lSs o .m IT, @
mons the then supervisor Ior Massachusetts, and the
had nj awsy fG ana os s 60 to
the the as 0ae afa been
~, BUTLER oLoRiks IN THE sANSonss
could Be lst re rsscsIs who had asiTaSdins
the government and then CSngsss would not be obliged
s iii Of @ dsreet
Mr. FOSTER, ohio. made ta RI, remarks ir
which he alluded to Mr. Butler as an attorney Tor san
Mr.. BUTLER denied tnat he was sanborns attorney
hoped to BE- and he Would give his Services very
m to M Su ao ss as s
one time God came down from heaven to punish mis-
what not true but only because he had kept back
paw - ' pEsuscIArroN OF THE SYSTEM
Mr. HALE rep Of Me- denounced the whole system
him as il the Treasury Department was run for their
on their s o hid he se of the
Ways and Means Godspeed in their efforts to repeal the
Mr. DAWES OF Massachusetts, regarded the whole dis.
@ ossg mr. had nc @ aebas
and had on discussing the merits OF the sanborn
" NTH n nag 0SSa i@SsI
e eq e 's'is s public he that s
would have been willing to wait till the matter came
farming the The effect Of it was corrupt
ing.
Mr.. Roberts,, of New York, another member of the
same effect The country, he said did not want such
PnslTs rsp Of detailed how as an exeea
ed
BE q s a as a to
collect The order to get y cent mt
contracts as dssredtabls to tie government
Mr. Cox of sd The he had p,F ts
passage measure under which the sanIorn con
ooers had heir
IN wou hardly
defend.
MIR. PHELPS, Of New Jersey, said that looking
the the s e Item 1n sfse o e ha
sonal connection and which he had detailed to the
sir en IN e William Two
Noyes and Mr.. Edmund Peniold-and he presumed that
that had With inc case
AUTHORIZING THE coNrRAcT
Mr. rep) Of Ohio sS his astopish
he had done with the sanborn contracts and he
to give history ae aw unde whsh the
had been, made, 70 the ccmmtse on ,ApprNpria;
3 aa Of s
tracts for the coscoR OF UNPAID nx9 n he hsd taken
he desired 1t put into the law. Mr.. Boutwell,
had aisscnted from. it. and expressed his disbelief
the committee the clause was unanimously rejected,
and the bill passed the House not containing The hi4
the Committee on Appropriations recommended 1t to be
struck out and it was struck out subsequently.
ierces were strong and decided in their de
ina t. n clause use, in rndns
had undertaken to obviae its objections by put
ting into the law that contract should be gwen to col
statement, first filed under oath, set
ting forth exactly the companies, eorporatons,
only condition which the House conferrees would
agree to the clause he kheW OF no act or an act
and opposed by the other than that 1t therefore,
gross TO say a ne b naa e
tee had engineered II.
Mr. BEcK OF Kentucky asked him whether he bad not
urged the House 70 vote for the measure and had not
voted for it himself
port did friend from Maine (Nr Hile) who OPP
posed that clause all the while and the gentleman
although he was as much opposed to it as i. ''p''''
Mr.. Garfield then proceeded to reply to MI. Beck on
whether the sinking fund or was not induded in
certain figures he asserting position and Mr. Beck
being eucdated to the satsfacton of either gettemsn
or being made very plain to the committee the commit
The House then, at half-past five, adjourned.