, 1874-05-06
PROF. SWING.
Second Day Of the Trial.
The Prosecutor Renews His
Demand TOT D. Con-
tinu@neo.
The Examtkatien of witnesses fer
Tho Prosecution Begun,
Dr.. Patterson Tells How He
Talked with the Professor.
And BECAME Convinced Of
His Soundness.
Curious Letter from the Rev.
Mr.. Trowbridge.
DR.. svazey Testldes Concerning an
Alleged Hcretical Sermon
Mr.. Goudy Is Positive as to Prof.
Swings View Of a Call to the
Ministry.
And Rigorous Examination
Docs Not Shake Him.
Curious Letter from the Rev.
Mr.. Trowbridge.
Or. svazey Testldes Concerning an
Alleged Hcretfcal Sermon.
Mr.. Goudy Is Positive as to Prot.
Swings View Of a Call to the
Ministry.
And o Rigorous Examination
Does Not Shake Him.
The Bookseller's War,


The Rookseller'e War,
W.T. ot,osaa o-o.h,.torv ro.,,ne1 TIM tr1al Of
Ihe lineage 11oops1o'J 4oauo" MI
Prof. Swing yessoroa9 mosa'1ns III 1nu fuo'
Church, corner Of Indiana hyenue and I"enty-
i1rst stroet The call Of the roll showod full
,tto,d,,ca NJ Inv and clerical delpgatAg, Whi1o
attenoanoo u 10y euu I'o 80. sasat te.. x,ro.>
thero was eooa1y nonaoss - ep"s'e'0A' f-''-
ent.
At 10 o'clock the Presbytery mas called to
order bv tho Moderator, the Rev. Arthur Mitch
~, .s1s ro,,o.toa t1,at tha frat fer moments be
Gu, VINO leauos''a 1r.a uuas 40 49,. ~ rarv fo4
apehs ~ ps1ye: 1n Wa ~. u.os ~
moments Indeed, and then tho Moderator 1ea IN
audible prayer.
,r1r MrHrrEg
..s.,. a;..,so,r-, t,,1r r,,ocn a. IN 4ha
aoon'oe,1opo uoeus ~ n.-aaa s,nt.na,,,r
approval OF the mlnuteo' ~. e"A@e5 aoni'Au'6
that the questions to Prof. fstton aha answers
In relation to procuring the testimony OF Robert
T,u1 c,o1,,er in thu nroceed dingo Of the previous
S"s sha,,1d ha ornbod,ed in tho minutes AZ mart
Of tho record Dr' hltsfease al'o eonte4.asa n:a
thai tho minutes sEonad contain Feoo1o Va A's
.a{rat +ha dt1,;onltv.
~u3Hss n]as 'D nst4ns nhtootad IN cncnmherfnr tba
tseh. 49, . ,.;a,, ,,od nv sfnrt towara
ealnntes S''u o.1soi "a1u ~ A1@ n" sso.saa
influencing tho mind OF tho pouy' 40 Ie'e1teo
particularly to the questions asked by DR.. Bwa-
aoy in connection with the application for 2 CON-
Dr. Patterson, with soma Significance, tsuK-
gcstod that tho Court would judge r. foE + isaelt t
what would influence Its decision. He honght
the INQUIRIES and answers as to whether tho
,,rosecutor had used duo diligence IN bringing
ia Rny. Mr.. Collier into court nero likely to
have aou1e influence.
surdity ii tho proposition to place on tho rocord
priynte conversations among members.
tho OBJ ob3oct ,, Of the prosocutor in keeping those
etostions aud ansNera from the record Uas to
smbarraBs tile Proebytery when the prosecution
took nn anpoal to tic Synod
Or. Kittredge trusted he had heard the Int OF
insnuations OF this kind.
Tho Rev. hi. Bulreil inquired nH to hoH the
questions were asked and answered.
prof. patton replied TINT lie answered them IS
a u1attcr Of courtesy-snb"ered them facetioualy
and with no idea that they Tould 20 On the REQ
prof. Patton-!That Is my usual habit:
The Rcy. Mr. Barrett gRYo notice that In Case
tho motion to put On reootd were defcated, he
,honid demand that Prof. Patton bo put on the
tnud and required to state whether dun dill.
aouce had been used In bringing In testimony.
Mr., Moves urged the Importance of placing
this matter upor, record.
A
WIS carried by majority Of fYe Totes. Tie
ladies applaudod.
FULL REroR1 WANTED.
The Ray. Mr., Trovbridgo moved to employ 4
stonorrapher to take the Proceedings.
prnf pnttnn fayored the motion.
1twas tabled temporarily.
THOSE QUESTIONS.
rhe ststed Clark moved that DR.. Bwazoy aud
Prof. Patton be requested to repeat tho ques.
pro1 petton aaid that tho questions and An.
swars could not bp repeated, rs they were not i1
axistence,
~ Hwszev offered to repd The questions from
The newspaper reports. Prof. Patton could dt
the samo With tho answers.
lid a. rhe % answers @ rpported were not fhe an
awars ha gave, and he should not accept them.
The motion to request repetition OF the ques
tioaa and answers Waa adopted.
bercd them, assiated by tho photographic noteJ
al q reportcr.
When It cams Prot, Pattona turn, he said b.
oor1d not rernn1ubor tbs roplies mnde By him th.
preceding day.
to bo The record.
~ swazev said he ahould than eek that ths
cicrk record tie answers lie had read.
.rsr.ra ~ 1tyan hv prof. Patton Ths motion pre
rn;od.
Prof. Patton gave notice OF protest.
Mr.. Moves askod Il the the prosecutor ,7as expect
ed Ia nroye the mattata alluded to iu the aitlda
Ut from Kentuoky.
1trof. Patton said ho could not tell Whether o
no. ho could provo them.
Mr, Navel asked il he e1pected to provo b.
n1r. nollior specification ilrst tudor oliargo sec
md. az to tLs statement OF Prof. Swing that b
aeroed with Nr. Collier in his belief.
eh1r, Wood asked II such questions wero IN OF