, 1874-12-01

upon tno TeaescninB Of tho Court it appeared that
tho panel WIS exhausted, with tho exception Of one
JUROR End tho Court tcrcnron Issued special reuira
for t~enty-fo'r "good aud lawful mcn,n raturnable
forthwith,
Tho Court 1skcl tho counsel II they instssed upop
delaying the proceedings Until tho whoo twoty-fout
wcro eecutcd.
Air. Reed said he WAS willing to examine thcsn Is
they wero summoned.
Mr. swctt preferred to hayo tho wtoo panel returned
in duo form.
r. Reed urged that tho Court had authority to send
the Deputy-SherlAs into tho otreos to pick up jurors
afr. swctt Bail to would 10 ahead wI,on presented
With . list Of tw;l7p,
Mr.. Reed remarked that, M question Of practice,
counsel were not ortftlcd to l1st
The Court thought tho sanla; but until shoro vas
Official evidence Of tho selection OF tho urora lo could
not recognize them As such.
It was finally decided to 90 on, mud four persous
we're put tuto tho boz
ROBERT sT1wAnr
did not kno" Gage or anything abnut him beyond
what ho had hoard md read. He Ind i'll opinion,
which Was uBatnes tho defendant, founded upon what
no had rc.1 bit did not knew that Tho rerorts wcrc
trnc. Challenged rcrcmpsorily by the dofense.
". r. sIDAIp
had heard talk OF tho case, and had formed m
opinion, which was fixed" Challenged for cause l,y
tho prosecution.
T.w. pwxEn,
who had talked nbont thu case, but lad learned noh~
Ing about tile fucts, was accepted
SELsOH s1AT
knen Mr. duao 'y sight, but had opinion as to hin
guilt or tnnocence. Challenged rcrcnrtor,y by the
EroEecuttcu,
said ho know AIR. Gage, a,sd WI challenged psremp-
tor!iy.
ALEXANDER orrMrsr,
at Lbertyytne, challenged for cause ha having
suit pendlng In the eour.
GEORGE n. nunNETT
hH formed Eli opIfon from what he hed read In tho
newspapers Challenged lercmr:orily by tho lofeuse
alE. sLucuM,
Who moved bin gools to Waukegsu from Ninona tvo
years ago. . had not permanently reusLeI hore u,-
I'll six nontla ago, MAS challenged for cause-inoou-
rntcncy.
Tho Court could not SEQ Tic point.
Ms. Heed challenged Him pcre;nptortly.
DANIEL WARE,
farncr. who hd lived II! tho county forty years. hay
iug no decided opinion, waa accepted.
MESnY WOOD
thought ho could giyo Mr.. Gage fair trial. notnith-
aandlng prc}uAices caused by what ho had rea. Ac-
ccpttd.
II. D. HAYWOOD
hnd m opinion (which he presumed would influence
him. Excused for ca.sc.
LII STANFORD
had sc opinion, based upon newspaper statements,
but could sit Ia juror without bias. Ho believed
what he 2ead to 10 true. Challenged for oAuss.
JOHN WILLIAMS
had knowledge whaterer Of tho caao, but was ohal-
lengal potsuptorily by the defense.
JAMEB rtEEEr
read something about tho case but paid no partlcular
attention to It, Challenged perempterily by tho prose
cutlou.
JOHN r. 3uLL
had hoard eonlp dIBctBB{pn regarding tho case Int
formed puiuiUn. Challenged bnfDt,Iborl hy
defense.
JosErH PALMER
waa "deaih on treaaurcrs." I1o, however, had 10
opinion respecting alr. Gage. aud could Qiy. him
Immediately aworn 10 "weli aud truly try,' oto.'
OPENING nj ain. nReD.
11r Heed thcn opened for Tho prosecution. Uo sail
hnneyDr In all s oxlcrtoncca prosecuting nttornuy
had had painful duty 10 perform that then Is.
Ind known lin for long ti,ne o. i,sa b.: % mos lin In
fa,nilinrly on tho street, and they had always
been Kind to each other. HENCE q friend Was
ifhe faie,l 10 Ito ii o would 10 unwnrty Of tho ro.
gard of my honest 1aaM. liz lnt doubt 1t was true
saso lesrced o Prosecution ad al sost @ %t.out vi s
Whereby the defendant was presented at thu bar Of
court Of Justice charged With being criminal but 1t
WA fnct-one Of those thugs ihat must 10 mct or
socIey wand prove to DO roro Of Hand, aud govern
him, hut beliuyod himself bound under Tho laW and
tho oYilcuco to insist that the Jury should convict tho
defendant however painful, 1t Might be to tlesn to do
HQ. hIr. Iced tleu stated
THE FACTS lie INTENDED TO PROVE,
aaytng tint ho ahou!tt aow that tho doseudant admit
ae tlst ha uao fa1ao entrea III Lis book with yIow
Of leCeiylng mud Cheating tho Fluancs Committee Of
Tho Council Thu punishment fos fnting to pay over
nut tess tlan m0r9 than ton ycatd. lilo
asked tho Jury to gyo Mr. dago falr sral-tha bene.
lit Of eYery reasonable doubt. Of any former good
Mr. Swett said thu asfeAao WouAl 1uaku THUR opon-
Ing when realty to pteE0nt tuer raHs.
han 0'IANA.
Daniel O'lIara waa tho first Witness called.
Examined by Ar. Heed.
Q.-Wtluro do you reside? A.-In Chicago.
four years.
Q.-Do you hold any Office thcro7
THE pInhT OBJECTION.
III. awsit obJsoted to any proof that Nj. oaasa