New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1874-11-27
. ST s CRI pr.
$3.50 a. WI.
LATEST FOREIGN NE VS..
TIE CANADIAN RECIPROCITY TREATY

REPRESENTATIVES, OF FIFTY-Two CHAMBERS OF COM
MERGE RECEIVED By LORDS DERBY AND CARNAR-
VoN-0BJECrIoNs TO THE PROPOSED TREATY
LORD DERBY DEFENDS THE TREATY.
LONDON. Thursday, Nov. 20. 1874.
deputation representing 50 Chambers of Com
merce waited on Lords Derby and CarnarvOn, the
Foreign and Colonial Secretaries, to present obicc
tions to the proposed Canadian Reciprocity Treaty
with the United States.
Mr.. Sampson Lloyd said that under the proposed
treaty the manufacturers of England were placed at
great disadvantage compared with those of the
United States. The treaty was unfair in principle
and would be exceedingly injurious in practical
effect lie wished to submit a general principle,
that in any case where British colony depend
cncy negotiated treaty with foreign country
England should not be placed in worse position
than the foreign country.
Lord Derby replied that the Government fully
agreed to this principle.
Mr. Barron. representing Leeds, said he did not
desire to have protective clause. He only wished
Canada would not grant America anything more
than Eagland
Mr. Behrens, representing Bradford, stated there
was party in Canada which was so powerful that
IL might take action prcjudicil to England if the
treaty were not clearly worded to prevent it. He
asked for the insertion of n clause providing thai
the United States shall never have the right to claim
any remission of duties not accorded to British
mercc.
Lord Derby then replied at length. He SAID:
DO not know that We ever received deputation in
who's, views do entirely concur. Your ease Is. In
sunetaucc, acccdcd to absolutely, entirely. We agree
with you the main point that in every negotiation OF
this kind is the duty Of the Government to see that
English trade and commerce not placed at disad
vantage as compared with those Of foreign countries.
We should fail grossly in our duty H. for any con
81 Iteration whatever. allowed tho imposition OF
de rental duty against our own manufactures. That
never was our intention. Thcro il nothing In the
uronosed treaty, understand it, leading to that
conclusion learn that apprehenslons are entertained
an tne subject VITA surprise As rds the dill
only of inng the articles mentioned IN the scEcume
with sufficient clearncss something must be allowed ior
too GOOD sense and faith of the two Governments
CHARGED with the Interpretation OF tha treaty
As for the danger OF creating bad fcehhg
between England and Canada. If amy provisions unfa
yore TO British trade Inserted in the treaty an
firmly Convinced such provisions exit; aud l agree
,,ot did they exist tIcy would have created bad
feeling TJcre Is another side to the question:
Wmle protecting British trade We are bound 10
io1k at the peculiar position OF Cdhau'
il her relations to the Ulcd States. We are bound 10
place cc53ary obstacles IN tue wa OF the ireeS
commercial relations between those countries. II for
any .upp ,,cd interest OF OF cclto treaty
establishing such freedom, it perfectly clear that dis
content among loyal Canadians would result 1hosc
attached to tAe Imp rial Government. Who' DcleVe'
Immensely prepDnd'rate, would lend strength TO TIE
ulriy which looks forward to ann axiom to TIE United
Safes lppIcIrnd that the view % those WHO say
pose tAat THIS treaty establishes d'hefcn
mai duties in favor of America Is thai
inc duties on American goods were to be di-
u,iris.eI at ore, whereas The du.es on the
same lass o. ElLsh goods oIly TO bc reduced Ia
a series Vi Yeas. You Say there Is no guarantee o. 'h!a
IA tae treaty Ina Reason Is th"t 'no CUM
mcrciaI relations OF England anu Caha0a can
LOT be dealt win in treaty with foreign
mower Thry are relations OF IL purely domestic
character Ii any Canadian Parliament were here
after 70 seek t. Impose d.fcre1tlil duties the
Goyerlor-Gcn,Gal Wonll DO competent to ere
serve sach an act for the consideration OF the
Home Government. | IN .ko tao statement clearly
and DIS cty hat there is nothing ia this treaty which,
considering the rci.toHs OF tho mother country with
the colonc' wo1d make 1t possible for Canada to iu-
nose an rental duties Eisland III favor OF the
United States.
Lord CArnaryln spoke in similar terms pointing out
that Canada had never shown any intention u !p sing
cutios discriminating a-..Is. England.
HENRY C. CAREY ALLEGES THAT EFFORTS WERE
MADE 10 MlSLEAD TIE SENATE BY MEANS OF a
SECRET MEMORANDUM.
In one OF his recent letters to President
Grant on The proposed Il ciprOc.ty Treaty Henry T.
g. ray comments upon the statements made IN IL mem
oc,udun Oh commercial relations" sent with the treaty
10 Tue Senate for its Information, and adds:
Those which have been here exhibited are but me
tvurs those Ol TINS whOie memOrdhidn,' dl'cfr"i
Abe a. the authors, "hi.c nsutng 70 JOui sei
Nh, csIdent. AMI 10 That Senate Tor VII s. nyan a
non IL had prepared. /. may, however hI' Itc-
don't be- ASKED Low nLd been t.aJ Commissioners
should have vrntLrcd 10 play VIII facts aut n iFc''
10 tai. answer /, tndt tuS OJ unrnt ma no. 'c'H
intended the public eye, H. indeed Tor the cye7ol
mi inc Senator'S Marked conf ienta aud sent 10 Us
ID bic Gocdmcnt but ttie more than Fortnight pre-
Won, 10 LiJdrduent, Wucn al were DiSly OtCuptu' IL
remained 30 priVdtO mat cAIlICnt HcmJtI5 OK lut
mate, known 10 be oppose ~ "rrcitiOci.J, 'Olu
viIn oIHouIty be Persuaded that such "a paper
1,tI II may uOw, | think, DC conn ,Hty
.srred tAat lt would TO this hour have rehllhed uu
own ana prC.c hid nOS I He NEN-lOHh II.i1
NL on The ON Ui june. performed an ACT OI pu'Ic
ia ice III 1iN Jfhs It's leaders Hlh very or
'lct OF It's contents thas thO rst tliuP CHO'iu-
our various industrial interests TO obtain some iue Vi
lLc destructive character Oh the movement th"t ndI
men lor many months IN prCpirltlOn secrecy anu
ar me- Mr. President, commonly traye IN company anu
yyoru these transactions shall come ana tlbk ney
MAJ, 10 be fuliy investigated, IL viii be touhu thdt tuc
case now before US presents exception 10 Ino ruic
How lar could have been justihaOe III inc treasury
clerk VINO appears from tno memorandum Nseil 10
concerned III Its COncOctlO, or III yOul Scci
by whose order 10 placed Ill tho MINUS
nf Senators, ndor,e In any manner whatever pro
ducou ltt0 cTedtaOlc To Those concerned III io'InE
up0n the Union Onesded ana es,ructiye measure
leave for ou ~ determine.
RELIEF OF GARIBALDI.
uDopoS Ar FOR A GRANT BY TIE ITALIAN PARIIA-