The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1874-11-16

n suitable man to fill the office we ought to
pay not less than $1,000.
Mr.. Perrin of Berlin, moved to commit to
a member to amend by striking out the
fourth section the words "a keeper and )"
so os to dispense with the services Of
keeper, If we are to have the entire services
of the superintendent, which amendment
was opposed by Mr.. Lynde of Marlboro, |
Mr.. McFadden of Wells, and Mr.. Blodgett |
of st. Johnsbury.
Mr.. Abel of West Haven, opposed the |
Whole bill as being unnecessary, taking |
from the directors part of their duties and |
putting them upon the superintendent II
we have directors we should leave the law
so that they shall have something to do.
Mr.. Lynde explained that the particular
duties referred TO were devolved upon both
the directors and superintendent.
Mr.. Davenport of Wilmington thought
we were in section 8, giving too much
much power to the superintendent, and
really making him the directors and super
intendent, we might as well set up some
Eastwood directors and leave the affairs Of
the state prison to lie taken care Ot
by the superintendent. There were ether
objections to the bill but he did not believe
it necessary to discuss them as we refuse
to pass the bill.
The amendment proposed by Mr.. Perrin
of Beilin was then disagreed TO.
The passage Of the bill was then agreed
to-ayes SO, nays 80.
TIE LICENSE BILL.
Unfinished Business 233 regulating
the sale of intoxicating liquors, was then
taken up the question being on the motion
to dismiss.
Mr.. Smalley of Burlington, moved to lay
the motion to dismiss on the table and
make it the special order for Monday after
noon next; at 9. 30 O'Clock, which motion
was decided to be out OF order, as the
motion to dismiss took the precedence over
the motion TO postpone.
MIR. Anterior of Glover, said that by this
bill we put only $50 in the way of free rum
and he did not believe the people of the
state of Vermont wanted any such law.
He demanded the previous question which
was seconded by the House. The question
was then taken, Shall the bill be dismissed?
Mr.. Fnirman of Wolcott, demanded the
yeas and nays, which were taken-ayes
100, nays 43
Ayes-Abell, Acheson, Atherton, Bacon,
Bailey of Fairhavcn, Barney of Guilforl.
Bartholomew, Bartlett, Batchelder of Peru
Bemis, Bentley, Bckford, Billings, Bod
gett, Bottum, Braisted, Brown of Lowell
Burgess. Churchill of Gilmore, Comngs,
| Cook of Mendon, Coolidge, Cutler of Ba-
kersfed. Cutler of Highgate, Cutting,
Dart, Davis Of Reading, Dutton, Eddy,
Ellison, Elwell, Fairman, Fifield, Finney,
Fits of Wardsboro. Foster of Browning
ton, Fullerton, Goodwin of Chelsea,
Goodwin of Tunbridge, Graves,
Gray, Grout of Barton, Guild,
Hall, Harlow, Harris, Hitchcock, Hcl-
brook, Holden of Clarendon, Hopkins,
Hubbard, Hudson, Hulburd, Jones, KEEL
sey, Kclton, Ladd, Lee, Lefevrc, Lord,
Lyndc, Martin of Londonderry, McFadden,
Minett, Mitchell, Montgomery, Munson,
Newell of Dover Nichols, Noble. Palmer,
Parker of Andover, Pattee, Peck of Ira,
Perrin. Pierce of Stannard, Pike, Powell
of Richford. Rowe of Poultney, Samson,
Snaw of Charlotte, Shaw of Pittsford
Smaley of Burlington, Spaulding of Yves
ton, Spencer, Stanley OF Leicester, Steb.
bins, Stevens of Charleston, Stevens OF
Webster of Franklin, Wheeler, Whtcomb
Wilson, Woodward. Wright of Orwell.
Novs -A1oms of Maidstone Ala, Ans
don Roottio P,iss -" Ro~nton I Rrn n'', %
StroenrJ Rrrr Of W;adle,nwr ''' Cran W
S.,I',a rnr',.nt, IAN.
Guiyer, iynia a " D Soln"u tl,,, Da.enP9It
,S;1,o,. Vi 81 mhaf,ord C;,,,a,' cam u
p praudor VI uniSom nf P arro ifmtnh;' "
U,,,nI';m' Ill ot Cas,ia,,,, Wo,,t 70
I puntnn Wo,tohss ue % S"sher' nemt .
M "ISU '' Worr;son WaSh or, am'o -
Rern;n%,on, URr;en pari1hrrs t''J meeJ
Sayl,s. Shurtliff, Slade of Middlebury
Spaulding Of West Winsor, Stone. Titus
Webster of Putnev. Wells. Withheld. VII
mnrth.
Absent or not yoting-Abbott. Bailey O
Windsor. Baker. Barnes. Barney of swan
ton. Barrett. Batchelder of Arlington
Birchard, Buckley. Burbank, Cameron
Cardell, Chamberlin. Churchill of Goshen
Clark, Cotton, Cooke of Corinth, Currier
Curry. Danforth, Daniels, Davis of Dan
vile, Davis of st. Adams, Dixon, Doty
Draper, Evans, Fits of Salisbury, Foster
Of East Montpelier, Gillett of Richmond
Goodwin of Hartland, Green, Grnnell
Grout OF Newport, Harvey, Han
wood, Hawiey,, hayes, henry Hid
6ard, Her. hiil, Houghton, houston
Howe, Kennedy Kent OF Dorset King
Priqgewaler' Mng OF LunenDurgh' Ainne
Ia rouh.aih, n1l.le VI uemcnai1, marty
o, orange, Mcoaliey, Millcr' raudock
DE- VI po us,an p,rL;nn Ae y. mn.eIDury
of NorthfoId poyalI of C.n,Lud,o d.,
VI No,,hiciu, i1mI'i vi Oa,ipliuSe, ~.
U uaIii' nen,i1m, i ';.. r uisoi' Soo,'
oihl.h ol Auu,son ohis' M VI 1ellcno' speak
ei, opIaSue, o.an,ey Vi " asniIs.oil' Ssorrs
strong l0pey' Iyier' IAN, Watsnn, Wepp
Wee.oh' Wisu'n'"n' "'nsio"' "rgh'
orMch' iou"s'
Mr.. Smalley OF Burlington, explained hi
vote in the affirmative, that he did it TO
the purpose of moving reconsideration
After the announcement of the vote Mr.
Smalley moved to reconsider the vote frs
taken, and that the motion to rcconside
be laid on the table until next Monday al
ternoon. The motion to lay on the tabl
was disagreed to and the motion to recon
slider was also disagreed to, beth by YER
decided vote.
Renorts-From the committee nm claims
~. m 40 a., - ~ ~ a,