The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-10-13

|
sentiment OF the American people is unmistakabiy
against third term. not 70 say wnat the demo-
| cratic party urge. The nominee for a third term
would not be tolerated even party dictatl0n
| made Grant the nominee again
| LAhIsON CHARLES NJ, ONO. democrat the day
10 past when third term Is possible for repubii-
| can President. Mr. Lincoln might, perhaps, have
NAG u had he lived, and Grants ch ,a would
fore he was,
LAMroar, WILLIAM H., New York, republican. 1
cannot now say what l would be III iavor oil In
/ 1875. Would support Grant II nominated.
lansing. WILLIAM f.. New York, republican,
does not respect one or two term princibe. 10
say tnat man ought not to be elected lhird time
70 say tnat the people, or the majority OF Them
representatives. What the party may DO viii be
governed ny the circumstances ut the time the
the people there Is no reason why ne should not
be cordially supported
LAWRENCE. WiLLIAH. Ohio, republican, is against
miro term. ana would meet the question OF sup
p porting nun II nominated when the time comes to
| LAWSON, JOHN D., New York, republican Men
honestly diner on the third term problem, ana he
coaia not now say what he would do II Grant was
LEAoH. JAMES NJ North Carolina, democrat, is
the ancient enemy OF . third term and an original
LEWIS, BARBOUR, Tennessee. republican. VIII be
better able TO debate the subject hereafter. vnen
us better next time than any OF the aspran;s Tor
LorLxND. JAMES H., Delaware. republ,can mink,
that there might be an emergency when It would
be wise 10 allow the people to exercise their own
/
/ good OF the country appeared to demand 1t.
| LoUGHRIDGE, WILLIAM. Iowa. republican, is a
| ever be mentioned In Presidential caucus and
could not consistently support MN IL renomisated.
Lowe, DAVID p. Kansas, republican, is in favor
LowNDEs, LLOYD Jr., Cumberland, Nd ,epub-
lican, has no conviction Or opinion TO give.
pledged to oppose third term.
LYNCH, JOHN r. Natchez, Miss, republican. has
| no prejudice against third term that would pre-
| vent him from voting Tor ana supporting Grant II
| renOmlnated.
MAoDoUGALL O. D., New York, republican,
| would favor one term OF six or eight ye,rs, and
L would be doubtful whether he would mpport
MAGE JOHN A., Pennsylvania, democat. not
| only would not support Grant II renominated, but
| would oppose ms reelection, as ne would the
Candidate OF the republican party, whoever ne
HAaINN1s MARTIN. Montana, democrat. is OPP
| posed to third term for many reasons. me prin-
clpal or which Is tnat he wants to SEE good
| democrat succeed Grant in 1877.
| MARSHALL, SAMUEL S Illinois, democrat, shares
| the universal democratic sentiment--tvo terms
| and no more for anybody, not even Grant,
proposition is so remote he could not sal what ne
| would 90 il Grant was renomlnated.
| MAYNARD, HORACE, Knoxville. Tenn, republican.
thinks the subject OF third term Will TAKE or
Itself. He could tell better when he was required
to decide upon the TACT whether ne would support
MoCRARY, GEORGE W., Iowa, republican Is not
| In favor OF tnlrd term, put THINKS le would
support a measure looking to a Limitation OF the
Office to one term OF SIX years. Has n,thing to
say as to what he would do II Grant wer renomi-
MCCORMICK. RICHARD g., Arizona, republican.
does not think the question OF third term has
sufficient probability about II to warrant any DIS
| cussl0n or exp ession Of opinion upon It,
McDILL, JAMES W., Alton, Iowa, republican, IL
opposed to third term and would MOI support
MoDILL, ALExANDER g., Wisconsin, republican, is
SO plainly opposed to q third term thai he would
not support Grant II the party was fooii'h enough
M0FADDEN, OBADIAH, Washington Territory, DEM
ocrat. His democratic proclivities male him the
MCJUNKIN EBENEzER, Pennsylvania republican,
is opposed to third term, and has no iaea the re-
| publican party will ever attempt to run Grant
again. he favors limitation OF the Residential
term to six years, and would not support Grant
| MCKEE, GEORGE c., Mississippi, republican, is
! opposed to third term. Ir Grant wal rairly re-
nominated, however, he would give Inn his sup
MCLEAN, WILLIAM p Texas, democrat. Texss
| democrats ana republicans are 0pposal TO tnird
McNULTA, JOHN, Bloomington, ILL.,, republican.
! while he is not committed Tor or against third
term, believes II the party wishes Grant az q can
didate and he would accept ne knows VI no reason
why ne would not support him.
! MERRIAM, CLINTON L., New YORK, republican
Can speak definitely when the facts are before ham
whether he would support Grant Il renomlnated.
is coniident the intelligent and patriotic MASSES
would revolt at the proposition OF electng man
MILLS ROGER O., Texas democrat. third
term would be revolutionary, and God knows We
nave had enough trouble III the South Without
! tearing an imaginary Caesar.
MITCHELL, ALEXANDER, Wisconsin democrat, is
Internationally opposed to Q third 'ern. -
MONROE, JAMES, Oberlin, Ohlo republican. he
would have to think over the suoyecs and consider
the arguments Tor and against thru term before
MOORE, WILLIAM s., Pennsylvsnii, republican.
" is unnecessary IN his opinion p EXPRESS any
opinion as to what he would do ~ Grant was re-
MoasY, FRANK, Monroe, La, republican, would
| support Grant II renominased, 1M wouId regret
renomlnatiOn. t,N
MORRISON WILLIAM R., Illinois, democrat The
opinion Of the American people y too positive for
| any party to attempt to run Resident TOR three
terms. We have not quite forgotten the example
MYERS, LEONARD phtadelphI. Pa republican.
has never thought Of the subJet Of third term,
but is under the impression that Inc HERALD
articles have made it more po5lbe than ever A
thousand circumstances may prevent Grants re-
IN ne g IN S
choice of the party. In that vent / would GER
tanly most heartily support MP r,
tlonally against second terIand the sworn op.
ponent Of Grant for third tenn.
So far in favor OF third terTfnat II Grant should
be the most available candidate in 1876 he would
NEsMIrH, JAMES W.. Oregon democrat. Uncon-
ditonaIly against Grant tnld term, the republi-
can party and Attorney Genrai Williams In par
NIBLAck, WILLIAM E., Indna, democrat. The
4 conservative sentiment in Indiana Is SO strong
that 1t would be- impossible p run man with any
hope OF success q third the Grants days are
numbered His request, let us have peace"
| will be changed by the sediment Of the people
| to MAY lie rest in peace'
| MILES, JASON, Mississippi. republican, Is not an
advocate OF third termto the extent that he
believes the safety OF TN government depends
upon 1t, and without spe clating as to GRANTS re-
nomination thinks he wou1 support him II again
presented.
MUM, DAVID A.. Tennisee, republican, is in
favor OF third term II ids the win OF the party
| and agreeable TO Grant
O,BRiEN, WILLIAM j., Maryland, democrat,
opposed TO third term, Grant, to radical legis-
lat1on, and everything trtainlng to the rule OF
| the radical party. .s sn.
O'NElLL, CHARLES, Philadelphia, Pa, republican,
| mas no convictions eirnt Tor or against third
! term. He does not k1w whether Grant Will
be q candidate for rejection, but II he was
! nominated he would hearly support MIN.
1 ORR, JACKSON, Iowa, rebbican. To say whether
| he was In favor OF thh term now would be to
open up mooted qnesbn which the party can