The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-05-28

was married 10 the plaintiff and she was not hts
vie. and denying any OF the acts Oh adultery
charged.
The fourth defence alleged that the PLAINTIFFS
name is not Irene Tim, but irene Ashton
The seventh defence alleged that ne was engaged
TO be married to q respectable young lady, OF nrst
class standing In society and the plaintiri. becom-
ing aware OF the same, threatened to expose de-
fendant's relationship with her. and, tearing the
exposure he paid her the sum OF $500 and obtained
from her general release from all claims.
The eighth defence charged that this action was
only brought TO extort more money. Mr.. George
f. LangheiH, counsel Tor Mrs. Tim, made motion
strike out the fourth, SIXTH seventh aud eighth
defences as irrelevant and redundant to the
issues In this action, claiming, among otner
points, tnat mere were only TWO Questions "a tne
antf If she was not, that put an end 70 the case
II she was, the next question was. did the defend
ant or the plantin commit the offences charged by
each against the 0therl In opposition IL was con-
tended by Mr.. Howe defendants COUNSEL that
there never was any marriage ceremony, ana
he desired TO show on the trial that he had not
treated plaintiff as his wife, or held ner out as
sucn TO the world and thas ne coud no, snow oW,
some OF the defences on the spot ana TOOK the
papers, reservng ITS decision on the rest, but in-
timating tnat they were not proper deIences Ia
divorce SUIT OF this kind.
The Central Branch Union Pacific Rail-
road.
In the suit of Treadwen against Pomeroy and
others an application was made yesterday by Mr..
Samuel l.. Treadwel, the plaintiff, Tor an order to
compel Bingham II. Nichols. Treasurer OF the
Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad, and also
treasurer for the parties in the Credit Mobllier
contract .or constructing the road. TO produce lor
inspection the books OF the parties to the con-
tract his possession relating TO the building OF
the road. Mr.. Treadwell, who Is interested IN the
contract, made afrdavit that he had been refused
such inspection and even permission TO enter the
ONCE IN which the books are kept ne wants an
accounting, and IL seems there was an executive
committee, who keep large SUBSIDY IN their
hands aud do not want TO account. IL was TINS
subsidy that gave to Pomer0y the S0u0rtQuet Sub
sidy.n The defendant did not deny the facts, but
insisted that the plaintlff was not entitled TO an
inspection. Judge Donohue took the papers, re-
serving his decision.
Woman's Experience in the Lottery
-s..... Business.
7 Lydia NJ. More, ike many others, was deluded
into puyIng lottery tickets. Like many others she
drew blanks, but still she Rugged the delusive
phantom OF hope and kept on buying tickets, bus
with the same result. Having expended, as she
claims, s., $50 10 in tickets OF the Royal Havana
Lottery, she now brings suit against Mr.. Taylor
and others Tor twice this sum, under the statute
for bringing such suits making to the prosecutor
such liberal allowance. motion was made yes
terday to compel her to furnish bill OF particu.
John Graham for the motion and Mr.. Chase IN OPP
position, alter which Judge Donohue took the
papers.
: Decisions.
BY Judge Lawrence.
Meyer VS.. Gebhard.-Granted.
Crump VS.. Frederick Stillweli vs. Shimmin; ;
Batter Methfessel; In the Matter OF Dlckman
vs. Stewart; Rutherford vs.. White; Nelson vs. De-
grand.-Memorandums.