Green-Mountain freeman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1844-1884, 1874-11-25

something like this bill, and if not dismiss
ed. he would propose IN amendment which
would obvi,te ali objection to it.
Mr.. Smalcv, of Burlington, took issue
with Mr. Grout rs to the manner in which
aliens are naturalized in the state of New
York.
Mr. Henry. of Chester. did not approve
the amendment rs proposed by the COM
mttec, but there are merits IN the bill
which we should save.
The motion to dismiss WIS then dis I
agreed to- The amendment proposed by |
the committee was then, by unanimous !
consent, Withdrawn.
Mr. La,ld of Alburgh. moved that new
section be added rs follows: = Sec. :,
ANY person who shall hecomc naturalizcl
under the laws of the United States, IN this
state, shall not be allowed to vote in this
state until one wear after such ntturallza-
ton.
On the adoption of th, amendment, MIR.
Smallev. of Burlington, demanded the
yeas and nays. which We're taken-ayeS
IFS. navs 50. 50 the amendment was
agreed to.
The bill WIS then re;.l the third time
and p;,sSel-aye>, ll6, nays, %.
Was there a Cat under that Neal
The Senate had before it, on Friday, 4
bill relating to appeals in cllanrcry, which
some senators seemed to think contained 4
eat under the meal AMI was designed
to annoy and circumvcnt the present man
aoemcnt of the Central Vermont Railroad.
The committee on the judiciary h,1ing
considered the bill AMI thought il ought
not to pas.
senator Clarke proposed an amendment
to the bill, and explained the purport of
the bill to be. to provide for the right OF
appeals from the decree of :. chancellor
made ont of term.
senator Walton opposed the bill, arguing
tllat to give right of appeal from Orders OF
:. chancellor would in most c:l~e> destroy
; the whole function of the courts. The
| bill proposed wa- one of the most mon
strous ever introduced in any Legislature,
e and seemed to be introduced TO Ill some
special case.
: Senator Wilson of Ollean, said ii might
! be proper TO give the reasons which actu
II tte,l the committee to civ" n unanimous
i report against tn" bill. He referred to The
l. litigation against the Central Vermont. hy
@ which large sums of money. which th'
/ road needed for running expenses. were
locked by trustee process, ana winch
n appeal could have been taken. would h:tv
! been still held To III" great dcirlmtnt G
the road. He thought such a law wuul
N result injuriou>lv /" every kind OF trusts
Senator Eowrl discussed the bill. show
I ing how greatly 1t would tend tpemoalri>
te the administration of trust property.
Senator Clarke said the proposed n
e. would brrcr!c tIv fir t. all ptr;ic~ 10
St suit. ~ injustice cuull be- worked und'
IA !, W.. >houId no- must this vast propcrr
~ of thc Vermont Central 10 the hands OF
ne single chancellor. who. from his position
ne may he subjected Ia influences that a
II. likely to warp the judg dgment of the pure
NJ man living.
les Senator smith looked upon the bill rs :;
attcmp. to accomplish hv indirertnc>~ tn
OF which the advocates OF the bill had itllt
ie- to gain hv Il square FIGHT. He thong
IRE llltt the industrial Interests Of the state q
AS mandcd that the people should rally abo
the management of the Central Vernon
he and aid it bv every honest means to ma
mo- the road pay. and 80 develop tn" a.rlcU
'"r tur;tl and commercial wealth of the >ta
tc7 senator Smith said he had been IN az
w. uou> listener in the railroad commit
her room. ana after following the cNaminati
the into all the bills of this character. he h
10 become con> inccI tia, the present cIll~:t
has ,lpon our Vermont railroads was uniu
'l"~ r.r>un:h m unc:,lIcl for.
Senator Wilson of Windsor. >lid Il
red this on the face WAS a very innocent b
urh but discovered on investigation very
WAS riou~ objections, 1t Woaid really opcr
t. lock up the current funds OF the Y
has mont Central now in the II tnd~ fthr 60
hol of chlnrerv. and actually prevent the OF
IN a;ion of the road
ny Senator kcNnuld> >alt That the DlII '
Jus not only fllr on the face. but was fAlr
fact. There WIS no eat IN the meal.
had been suggested bv the senator fl
'or nitv of an honorable senator to talk ab
IONS . rallvin- around amy c"rp"rat"n-
uul- WV ~, ~ !.
~ me iii and on fine ou.,tion Shall tI,c I
on,: proposed amrndmcnt of the senator fl
pro franhlln hr agreed to- senator " IL
tate W IA ','nr '''.' '''' '''''' IL
,,,u Er,s-S,n,,nrs A,v,,I Clarke p,rI
,cet Proctor Reynolds Hobv and Wyman
ting. Mays Senators Allen. Benton. On
ught more "lh"Tn' E"mlthI>' ,'r"r%r, non
luir- llnu"ht"h' il"wc h"llah"' lin"'
ears, inuiitin' i''''i. ~ h"-Pi>' h"S
IN be smith M'It"h' W il>oh "l 'Fic'lh-.
,ther son OF ln|>"r-io. =" 'hc ''iie"'i
was r'l'tleh-
that on 'he question: >ii'i llt SGco'l"
re- po>eo ;,lhrhdiheiil p' 'oolN'". Sei
ndcr ktvnoIdN demanded tile yeas ana
Wen winch w're-ye;'S & nays l'->tl
be br"ohlnG>' not present III Inc prev
b, be Nolt' Young Ill lilc negative =" me >c
amendment was rejected
n the he question being shall me hiI
said read the third time. Senator Clarke III
been, t" dlSmis<' stating that tie bill wlthou
ed to amendments was worthless and the M
1-two was agreed to-