The Republican journal., 1874-04-30
Waldo S. j. Court, April Term.

Iimnah T. Belcher VS.. Dani, @. Clement. Action
| Of trespaa- Plaintiff alleges that sometime in
May 1871, defendant hauled two large stone, upon
| her land ana left thcn Soon after the trcapasS an
action was brought before Justice and settled bv
the parties referring the matter the referee 10 decide
| where the boundary line between plaiutitf and
defendant Before the referee reported this action
wa commenced BY the report il is decided that
| the stones We're ON plaintiffs land. Defence | vas
about to build my part of the boundary fence and
1"r that purpose had right to % upon Your land
| Verdict tor plaintiff S9.G2. Vose. Hubbard
John Ames vs.. Benjamin Tompkins In the .pring
Of lS!, plaintiff went on TO defendants farm under
| an agreement to board him, having therefor his
house rent the use Of two cows, all the eggs and
vegetables he needed for his family and the u.e of
defendants horse and carriage. In the tall of the
same year plaintiff bargained for the farm agreeing
to pay $1,000 The farm consisted of ;0 acre piece
OF which Elisha Mozier held mortgage a 20 acrp
piece Of which one Sherman held Il mortgage. and
- acre piece which the plaintiff could give Il clean
title to. Plaintiff says that it was agreed that when
he should pay $500 the defendant should give him
deed of the II acre piece; that he paid $40 in money
and the balance in labor but the defendant rctu ed
to give a deed and to settle the matter, he brings
'hlS action On AN account annexed for labor and for
the $40, Defendant files account in set OH and
says ne refused TO give deed only because plaintiff
would not give him mortgage security agreed
'hat As palntt has taken his place in regard the
oo acre piece he IS entitled to the 5000. Verdict for
defendant, S4129. Wallace. Mcclellan
Hiram Harding vs.. Benjamin j. Woods. In isis
paintlh purchased Of Joseph Woods, his father in
law a 20 acre lot giving therefor his notes secured
by mortgage; on that note he very made one
payment of SO, and for several years he mad, no
payments, it being understood that Joseph Woods
intended to give the note 10 Mrs. Harding lis daugh
ter The plaintiffs statement is that in s5j the de
PENDANT came to him with the Old note desiring a
new note and mortgage, saving that the mortgage
had been assigned to him by his father that liz. gave
Il new note and mortgage, and in 1S69 made TWO
payments on it, one of $50 and one of So In 1868
he called for the Old mortgage and discovered for
the first time that the mortgage was not assigned
and brings this action to recover what he has paid
ON the note with $500, for two half day., work
Defendant says that under an arrangement Tor
nm to take care OF his father, mother and two
sisters this note among other things was given him.
that lt did not represent ~ plaintiff the mortgage
was assigned and only desired 10 have !: new mort
gage because plaintiff had sold the land covered bv
the old mortgage and wished to make a change
Nerdict for defendant Abbott. McIellan Hartman
John W Sprowl vs. Charles Abbott Til uctiop
IS ON an order for $500, given by the town of Frank
fort to one Henry T. rreyct fur enlistmy on their
quota, and by him assigned. Plaintiff claims that
under an action Henry I. Trevctys InIs of Frank
tort, this money was paid to Chas Abbott or his
attorney, that in fact the money belong, to him and
therefore Abbott should pay it to them Defendant
says never have received the money from the TOWN.
nor has any attorney for me and | claim ,Iofhfn,,