, 1874-01-05
THE COURTS.
Anotber Woman Wants a Separate
Maintenance.
irpument on The Put Question
Postponed.
s,,aced Breach Of Contract Bankruptcy
Items.
IT'LL TO RESTRAIN SALE.

1Itu9.
ELL TO RESTRAIN SALE.
rn,ovin p. yooke aud II. McEendrce Tooke,
,.-hu~hsnd. filed bill Saturday, in tho Supe-
nv Court, against benjamin Newman. Caroline
rsrman and John Ling, Mrs. Tooke, who
.n,,cd twenty-si1 acres in the ". II OF the
y of Sec. 7, 81, II, in Washington Heights,
..re = 1ust-deed thereof in June, to John Ling
,, secu1e her uote to benjamin Eewmau for
r. ooa and also to eecure one note for 1888,
'the, husbands and some smaller interest
.otoz. The uote for 3d. .333 had been given By
rooke in payment OF au interest il q patent
.r,t to one Daneis, wlo transferred it for o
.ar hundred dollars to said Newman, and he re-
a,ssted her to put i. in the trust-deed
99.s st first refused. s,ut afterwards consented,
m Nepmau's prons'ns to cancel 1t Oh the paw
W "anf q 81 .CCJGG, aud - extend payment for q
rs. ra,r d. until Juuc, 1s74- This noto, Toole
:i.,ras is void, ior fuilule OF consideration, and
shsf Newman and Liug knew its character. In
snorst, the 5000 note tell due. Con,plainants
rare unau!e to meet it, and applied for an e1-
tension, which Newman promised to give on
Their giving Per cent Interest Der month Tor
;i'iTty days. At the expiration or that time it
rss AGAR renewed ar tho rate OF Q per cent
month. and, since then, Newman has e1tort-
RI 500 month, as the condition on
vhich he would extend payment. He also
demanded, aid received, note for $4,000, and
sa,eral iutere5: notes thereon. as collateral. In
Decep,bcr, Newman reduced the extension Of
he payment Of the S3, 333. .33 uoto from one year
h SIX months, which made it fall dae iu TINT
month, and demanded aymoct. But complaint
.nts refused, and, shortly after, Ling advertised
Tie premises for sale on Saturday last. They
Insist that tho advertisement is void for non-
e1upliapce with the terms OF the trust-deel,
th,t the sale ought not in equity to take place,
aud accordingly ask for all injunction, which
vns gained " Judge .doore, On filing bond
ELL Fon SEPARATE MAINTENANCE.
Mary T. Hare filed a bil for separate main
tersuce against her husband, Thomas a. Hare,
arsul estate dealer here. She ee1s out that bhe
WIS married to him in 1867. III Virginia, AMI
cams here in 1871. After tie fire she Went to
Eye WITH her relatives for time, and, ~Aen sho
grest change in Ids 1sposition. For some time
they lived together, when ho induced her to
ysit his relatives in Wisconsin. promising to 20
bin,seH shortly. But long time elapsed, aud
vbsn he did 80 he ,.a;;yas oIly stayed I'd
BRING III her baes b' with him. ezcusing
Himself Oh the ground that ho wished to get a
horse for 1cr. Becoming tired waiting there,
e4e suddcnly returned here. uo seemed sur
prited aud ye1e1, but took her tothe City Hotel,
phere she has since remained. She has ascer-
tau ed ,hat there is d rival in her husbands
aaectons in the person of widow, Yrs. Bar
hcrl Mcllahou. Hare has been IN tho
hao.t Of staying out late at night, and
urging business ns his excuse. Thinking
this rather doubtful, Mrs. Fl. went one evening
to Lis office, but lie was absent. On her "ay
hore the Eassed Mrs. Mc3Iahon's house, and
eaw her husband skulsing around the back door.
She followed, and captured him, as he vas about
to enter, and q scene ensued. Suffice it to say
he accompanied her heme, and promised re-
formation. Some tune after, be persuaded ber
to 60 out to look At cottage in Lase View.
There size found o bu1om lady, who Was ready
to board them, or reut them the house for
her board. But Mrs. Hare Was suspicious,
snd refused to live with her. She thinks that
IN Investigation would show that the obliging
lady in Lake View and Mrs. McMahon would be
sonaa time complainant and her husband have
been living separate, and she therefore files her
bill for sefnrate maintenance. Hare has offered
to giye her $1,000 q year ii eho would re-
turn to Viginia aud live, bu1 sho
prefers tLe Garden City. Owing to her delicate
exosbitant. rs she has a child whom she must
support. Tho defendant has Treated her with
great cruelty, and is gwen to into1lcation, but
She does not desire q divorce, but only suih
cent to maintain herself.
EC1T FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT.
Edward P Hansen filed bill iu tire Circuit
Court against Charles Il. FELTON,. William A. Eel
toa, ard Nancy r FELTON,. Complainant says
that about tho LIST Of May he entered into 4
cont1ac: with said Charles Fl. Felton TOR the pur-
ehase Of The he E; = Of tue 5. Y: < oo ol Sec
which SCco was paid in cash, and 81, 500 was to
be paid when deed was given. il the title was
found to be satisfactory. Hansen alleges that
Charles Il. Feltona father had owned the land
ia hs lifetime, aud at his death it
Ssts tha to a,d the ss hsd b te
written authority to sell fol the joint benefit Of
tie defendants, or thar lie was empowered to sell
for his own advantage. In either case he had
written power to act. Complainant has paid the
$500 cash, but the defendants refuse to convey
power to bind them, and he himself Gays he act
ed On his own responsibility. Hansen had been
for yeara tenant on the property he contracted
to buy, and written lease had been given,
;! xlsa vas to expire in saa;.a 1871; but t.nhe he
u f' pueSas saas this rhs vas
the contrary, claim that he is in arrears for
rent and they are pressing him for the payment.
In 7iew OF the circumstances, therefore, com
plainsnt asks that the defendants may be com
<peled to convey the premises, or. If Charles Il.
Felton, acted without authority, that compensa-
ticn NAV te given for the interests Of those de-
fendapts who are not bound, and that sn injuno-
tlon may be issued to prevent any suits to re-
rcSer rent.
TIE ''pu7s" CASE.
The case to test the validity Of puts was CON
tnued Saturday, and the evidence al concluded.
Tie Argument thereof VAS, however, deferred
nhl Jan u.
DASEhUPTGY 1TEuH.
Daniel Shepard filed petition against james
"ads"ostt, charging thnt he has failed to pay
petthner $lG77 for money loaned, which ID
o!e!due, and alleging that he has committed
iaditione1 nets OF bankruptcy, in giving threo
separate warrants to confess Judgment. rule
to show cause and provisional warrant OF seizure
se:o issued, returnable Jan. IS, 1874.
III the matter OF Hugh H. 6Weetber OF. al, nj
rde1 Taa issued that proceedings he dismissed,
5a!esa objections arc filed in ten da9s, and adju-
Eca-on sat' inside.
In order Ras made in the case OF Salkey d
6e1son tl4at the stock he sold for ESQ.
y. G. Hotton d. Go. filed q petition against
lo1n Hayes and David a. Elmore, claiming the
I'm Of $424.35 due them on promissory note
md Email open account and charging them with
pfefsrentiat payments. Arule to show cause and
Injunction were issued, tho rulc returnable
walker, Oakley l. Co. commenced proceedings
isslaEt Henry Il. Heimerdinger. They claim .
S!ance. Of account amounting to 3,116.72,
enlch is long past due, and also charge that the
aeosor has made fraudulent preferential pay
Rents. 4 rule to show cause and provisional
"as1snt we're issued for Jan. Is, 1874.
II the natter Of Iferca Il Silyay an order