National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1874-12-05
THE COURTS.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES.
FRIDAY, Dec. l. 1874.
On motion of Mr.. NJ. H. carpenter, John Q.
Spooner, esq, Of Hudson, Wisconsin, was ad-
mitted to practice as an attorney and counselor
Of this court.
Milwaukee and st. Paul Railroad Company;
by Mr.. D. 4. SecOmbe in proprfG Personum. and
by Mr.. F. r. E. Cornell for the defendant. Error
under the 10th rule, Submitted on I'd inst.)
No. eco. The Commissioners of Hamilton county,
Ohio, plaintiffs in error, vs. ohm Gray. IN mo-
tion OF Mr.. S. A; Miller It was ordered py the
court that the judgment Of the sd Of October be
rescinded and annulled, and that leave be granted
him to docket the cause.
No. S34 The United States, appellants, VS.. Jno.
L. Vnlalonga. This cause was submitted on
printed arguments by Mr.. Attorney General
Williams and Mr.. Assistant Attorney General
Goforth, of counsel for the appellants, and by Mr.
J. W. Denver and Mr.. @. F. Peck for the ap-
pellee Under the 10th rule, Submitted on 10th
No. SOL. ]. s. Morton ct al, plaintiffs in error,
vs. Jesse T. Green ct al. On motion Of Mr.. E. X.
Hoar, advanced AID assigned for such day as coun-
State Of Wisconsin, complainant, vs.. City of
Duluth ct al On motion Of Mr.. ]. y. Sloan,
leave granted him to file bill in this cause.
No. 747. The Carondelet Street and Osrrolton
City Railroad Company, appellants, vs.. John
PoteYant ct al. On motion Of Mr.. NJ. H. Car
penter, ordered by the court that the appeal in
this cause be docketed and dismissed with costs
No. 535. The United States, appellants, VS.:
VIM. S. Shrewsbury This cause was submitted
on printed aTgum by Mr.. Attorney General
Williams and MI. Assistant Attorney General Go
forth, of counsel for the appellants, and by MIR.
c. F. Peck for the appellee, under the 10Th rule.
No. 4O4. Warren Mitchell, appellant, VS.. The
United Sta ties. Advanced and assigned for arGu-
ment on the 18th January next.
No. 655. Geo. Jerome and +. q. Bearman,
assignee and aPRSSe1 mSt0 vs. to P9GS M the
penalty Of the bond in this cause was argued
by Mr.. Alfred Russell in support of the
same, The further argument Of this motion
was postponed until Friday next r,,-,,--
State Of Texas, complainant, VS.. John Chiles;
On motion of Mr.. T. ]. Durant, leave granted
him to file hill in this cause,
Graham. The argument of this cause was con-
tinued by Mr.. J. Z. MRynadier of counsel for ap-
pelIee and concluded by Mr.. Benjamin Dean for
No. Is. Thos. D. W. YOnley, plaintiff in error
vs. VIM. D. Lavender ct. al. This cause was sub
mitted on printed arguments by w. M; Rose Of
counsel for the plaintiff IN error, and by MIA. H.
Garland for the defendants in error.
No. 90. The Springfield Fire and Marine In
surance Company. plaintiff in error, VS.. Sidney
W. Lea, use, &c. This cause was submitted by
Mr.. VIM. H. Swift, Of counsel for the plaintiff in
error, and by Mr.. H. G. Spaford, Mr.. ). V. Miles
and Mr.. EnOch Totten for the defendant in
No 100. Frederick Sehulenberg ct ALL plain
tifs in error, VS.. Samuel Hartman.
No. 10l. Andrew Schow, plaintiff in error, vs.
Samuel Hartman. The argument OF these
counsel for the plaintiffs in error.
Adjourned until Monday at u o'clock.
CIRCUIT COURT - CHIEF JUSTICE
CARTIER.
This court was engaged as follows yesterday:
Ould ct al. vs. Reddick ct al. Issue out OF
eboncery as TO the execution OF WILL This case
occupied all day.
SPECIAL TERM-JUDGE WYLlE.
Routine business occupied this court yesterday.
Adjourned.