, 1874-04-21

Words "anl other asttoos tho Oonfessien Of Tnithr
anil ly naming tho particular and naseafrs in
nhtcl tho words or expressions rofcrrcd to may DO
Specification :, Charge l. to be amended by refer
enco to particular dlHcorsca, or by nomo ohor explicit
! definition Of Its meaning and Scope.
Specification I, Charge i, 10 ho amended by striking
ontth words vol Il, oer norlonh, ind BY re-.
to tho particular passages Of the Confession Of
paasages complained Of.
speeineatioh ., Charge !, to be amended by rotor
sion Of Fnith which tho tcaclings specified arc sr
| posed to contravenc.
81 s ohafse to % ss1 ny refer
l'oaod to boimnugt,ed.
Specification II. Charge !, TO 10 amended BY striking
enco to the articles OF the Confession believed to 10
Specification ~ onrge I. to 10 ementel by prolnc-
tiona OF tho Confcssion snppoaed to bo lnlpBnod.
{This fs the one rotating to Penelope at, eooratesl
Specification Il, Ohargo to hc amc1ltlcd by stating
ariiclo ot the Confession supposed to 10 imrngncl.
oues % Tie asels IN tia Confession supposed 10 In
| pngned. .....
Specification II, Charge !, to bo acnt1cl by refcr-
ences 10 tic sermons mud raasngcs n which the uses
Bpociacaion ] is otarge ri i, to be amended by striking
out tho words land In other acrmons," md 1y nanl
Ing tho articles In tho Confession supposed to 10 coil
speeiication 70, Charge J. to he amended by naming
tho article hrtclGs of tho Confession Of Fah sup
Specification 20 Charge J. to DO amended By striking
ont the words, "and III other Hermnnt" and by ref.
eronoo 70 tho arces Of tho Confession alleged to DO
Specification 21 chargo ], to 10 nncnlcd BY naning
the portions Of tho Confession supposed to 10 Int
Bpecihcatlon "a, ohargo l. to bo amended by re-
fcrrng to tho particular sermons and passages had In
Specification 49, Charge /, to },o amended by rofcr-
ence 10 tbs articles III tue Confession supposed to bc
@ 3! chssas t. b. ,a amended e Il by nam
Specification 25, Charge 1, 10 bo amended by naming
Specification i undor Charge ., to be an1rndod by
stating, as nearly AZ possible time, place. and circ.
stances,
n ,s'pssls;st!on ohnrsoa, tho '0urces OF proof
Specification d charge O. to 10 amended by dcnning
Tho three doctriucs referred to.
Specification 4 dharGe a. 10 be amended by stating
| in ter1ns the point Of specification.
CALLING rnoF. EWING ASA WITNESS.
| Thtyd-Tho Row. David Swing ia named ss witness
hut tho prcsbycrJ could Scarcely with propriey,
cltc hin, Witness in tl,is cauae, unless ho SHOULD
freely volunteer hit testimony Wesnggcs therefore,
| TINT this name he Stricken ont.
| oNpEn OF THAI.
EditrtA-The Committee recommend that, when the
charges and specifications s1a 10 arranged properly,
a natle sufficiently definite, the trtal proceed In the
! following order:
l
q. The necusea be furnished with cory Of oael
charge mud the specifications under 1t, aud with the
nn1ncs Of the witnesses to support 1t.
.. All parties concerned, With their Witnesses, to be
cited to arear Ut an adjourned meeting not isss than
ten days af1r tho charges entertained, unless tho
parties agree to proceed with tho trla at IN earlier
i. THO trnl shall proceed to the meong appointed
for this purpose, unless for good cause the case bo
continued by tho prcabytery.
8. Defore proceeding with tho tria, the Moderator
| .tHfcntHrY In
our Rules for JudicatorIos. -
| g. The charges to be rcat! to tho accused
I 7. Answer Of the accused. ....
8. Examination Of wtncsaes: Firat, by the accuaer
acconh by the accuBcl his assistant counaol thir
ny the Moderator fourth, By any member Of tho court
Q. Comment uron tho testimony; First, by tho
third closing summary by tho accuser, 1t being pro-
viled that any nntcr introduced in tho coenB
speech Of the accused may be roiet to by tho accuscd
10. Opinion Of tho mcmbors OF tho jucato1y on tho
seyesal charges aud specifications, md laling Of tho
each charge, and then upon the Charge itself.
II. Judgment Of the 1udicatory.
12 Judgment Of ths udlcatory II any, On the man-
ner Of conducting tho prosecution.
POINTS OF DtrrEnENoE.
NIr, Ely-A1r Moderator, tho Committee Lave
ondoayored to agree, air, but thoro are two par
ticnlar points of difference. Ono of these points
Of difference first stated In tho report Of tho
majority, tho question as to whether, In prose-
cutting for o public onense, tho prosecutor IL
ronrirad tn co,t,,y with that Hnction Of te Dis-
.c;n),no syieh rafara H. ,rjvstn nTyansaa ~, a.r.
po S; ". .i ~ ni " tp oatonso - w "
1etfii'B Win tuo aGcusea peiofo bringing the
cnatge ana. secona, aa 10 whether the Proao-
specified under one charge In support Of tho
| other, Thoso aro the material poitB OF differ
onca betveeu vnur Committoo' nnd r snhn,it
tnor,fo~o H. +o;iar;',.- ranomt ":rA vii tat'
tnelolole, tne ionoh4ae iopot'' WI hsu'e,
however, that, III ehdea'otlhE 70 agree, dlu not
know until low moments ago that the first pnrk
OF tho report would ba Incorporated in the ma
jorlty report:
TIE MINORITY REPORT.
Tho undersigned tle minority Of tho Judicial Com
nattec, reports sss no aaseas from 10 much 81 tno
ttora 10 ,enno fa er ~ eet'"a ~
Charge and also from to decentralization to strike