, 1874-01-27
Chicago Tag Cases Argued at
Springfield.
Points Raised by Mr.. Adsit and the
Western Union Telegraph
Company.
Something More About the
National Life.
Bankruptcy ltems...New Suits,
THE SUPREME COURT,

| " dcrmh0n T..
Cleary, came m satnri1nv hoforo ~. a,rs.n,, ~,
os...t N""1" up e"'utuny poAofe 'he 5apfem'
court. ......
ARGUMENT Fon APPELLANT.
MFR. Edward Noby, on behalf of tic annne1lapt
mado tho following srr,mont, 'A' "pp'''Aa'
! An A,,o.sor .,.,t.S ~ ~ 60, ..,". ..>.
Asacn1v ireciai n sneh mannet as tho Genera
etuon exerna Sat n1.sr ns o ~ na nc u9n
tHs JaeS n & aw hs sa7 gbo ~ snd determined
sSn oph S9s &c 90. taxable ssn for as @
hsh h.a ha 1.oto - ~ nPpeHato telonnal. NO nppea
narv 6 Or DO 9hsr by no ss
int ~ aaeto "a no question TINT ho bad
Of Eouaiizaon haa o. a'19 @ noare
and the whoo aasesson to @ 0'A' 10 l0' eef'a
mont without notirc e' 'A' N"'o A"'aco 'oe @sBesa'
mad tho Asscssor made tho asyess,nont, M m,.,or
matter hns sdim!aed IL ,,ot ir"vers.io Ok THO
but tho act Of ocial miacoui1ct NAV IN nr,,s,oa
by indictment. ''-0'''@>'~' 3'''' ~ p''f''D'u
Therefore, II the Aasossor Ind cnoro ~, H., I. liz,
against aproants 1lac as lis uroportv. W ~ All n
fully nnd iutentionn1,v n, w,rh IT, tt, ~ ~ oof "i
would bo subjoct to Indictment and punishn'oIt and
yodua on liz IL taeo os 10 hed either
lcen exercsed-or would be- nnua for tbs Srn,,d 1Ao
Tic books show tha e umber n n,ra ~ ~ tan case
wero exactly III 31 snl m mnro thnt tia. ~ n.ohoy
ono safo worth t9s0 an] m more ,d ~. f. "as Ply
$47.e5o. VIVA 1'
:, t1a oaa @ us91 nctGAscu{ 1oVuHgana fnfenfonaHV,
70 S1iSss nmd tho tax has hecn wifally mud iuton-
iartv h. nnnn tna a aster r., amo,ns:
Of an Asssssor or al aat aay:ent rs y @ anu Crime
that r7oparabe injury must result from ta
is entitled to relief by injunction. '~''''A'
Authorities referred to in tho brief in Tho peo
n!o OK rel. Morgan u Leb submitted at this tcsm aud
o from fhe facta anl results Of changing
IN Gnhons IN @nvnn; v;ra;r,, N ,r,..4 o,o,
Marshall SAVE: e " "A'"'' f. ''o' on'e'''usnco
qury alra tint tIs decision he asks .iocs nns H. IL
pe1a H. On ~ inquiry" Inquiry:
~ Ing Sohsttason REQUIRES tho ra11o to bc ascertain
certuned Withnt ~ =, 9oage9t II cannot be a.
that no inquiry as Ieen mnde for doar "a ar
The operation Of this law, as wo have seon in tho
otAer case is to mako the yaue Of olar or it's I'M.
ncaato M feprcsensayo vary IN diGcsent countless all
nT RI" mSy causa,.',,o .sol Hv 70 40 cents:
ovy a1 by valuation t eyspy poraon sa 20
value to DO ascertanod by tic tribunal desauatsl
Mr. Adsits lollara nre worth loo ccnts each thu
Tribunal vested With power ty the Constitution las u.s.
1heir number and that they arc Of that exact
nv ~ ANY, in" ~. 10 .eHH,fea to pay greater State
tho State Ths satutc II M o.es e. aolaE IN
aside of yauca ascortatnod, and ssxg one Of liz
dolara IL much Ayo Of another, In another COUNTY
ls yol.
oyiSe hv IT, sn snsh overthrow Of tho method
.''H sp,o..o .a@o NV. -
aftor o,,,;,,, aHG h;.te HtatosSsEta,,oESEnAh, ~ r,
III a1 +si,". 1snsoy ~ t1e caeo, stated ampli-
nou ~ a1u q. icles UPON ttie iollo"lng points:
m hint u ,lc properly Of appellant was relatively
t,ro,,;thaa hn 80 s.s .omn 9r county. tho statute
fri,o ,,so.-;s;nno ~ Rn i1eApaNsiYo remedy.
,,ros,rihj,,. ~, " sno AeveAue iaW OF 1917,
hoard of ran uut'an q .he ssate
B. The stnte Boars ~ 1soua1;sat;oa 1s;sat;onal.
c,"ai. in5;"s1 a:nani,. - 4uan1huon act III
~ i;..,;ta ~ -, amu, HA'io aetlnE within
~ thair Julsnacst9n, the correctness
iotcrs1,, eanuos Do questioned col
Ti,nsa .>na,,;,,
r...nn;,,p pon1'o1s @ nu9 suppor1ea y very close
EsSl ats tn W. i, aa;'',, ~! o. anthofltos Mr.
aiton too nrovaia~t ~ .elo ~ dispo-
outLor,t,, ~ H. IN ~ sto"t "4tu GIouLeMpt tne
t;n, n,,2 s1o o olacais 70 "nom the Constits.
sauu taa "a" ua7 cohndsa the assessment of
~ te w. pneposo o. taxation II 1t is
t.n,tu ~, ai ~ =. ertofs n ASSESS
1,oa.. sAt uy W. outanoa peloFo the boards OF
1nv;no t,,a, z iof thas pulposo, persons
,";r Sr;o.encsa %afoS ~ , ,copant WI bring
mn'nSr suTa ooalas anu ~ this
sii,o caaa waa tasen 1n ,1ndar Iae. Isaesseh
o..ae Ino eaoe nus 'ahea 4noef adV'soinent by tho
Sou1.. 1.s,,, .r,,o,,,,,.. .,.,z.. .-.....
hfau.rs 1v;1l,a,as usioT aEn.ol'ApI COMPANY.
utata5 ~ raata ~ t,,;a 1muts1n, los appeilant
,,on,s e, A"s'' " ''''e es1e' WHICH hA9e already
'eeA h''os+
7r,o ,o;,,,. nn ..aaa ..s1 .a;c CASE. .
tno polnts naae anu reAed upon by counsel
ma p,~.,,,. .+ =. ION,
ann 1so.en1o @ aot ~ tofa, unaef Which thia
neIo Ioos M aa cntan,,3a attempted to DO
na9e, uoes hos contemplate tho taxation Of tho
'amsat Ht.a aa.s ssocK
,,.nl a. aeuion ~ tho ack IL Clear and dH-
ma =, ratarnn, " ~ IT, u iao Gogsla.
s Wnch nc aro 20 10 saP1eos to taxation, and
. ,nt inoi,,5a5 n~ae,,t; y. ; ~. eo1apau1cs