New-York tribune., 1874-12-29

order for bill OF particular This order nowhere IN
produced. 1t excludes nothing In the world except
proof Of specific acts adultery occurring at places not
whon. SPECIFIC act they are at liberty introduce 1t
by very express Of this order and there 10 os
o word this order which says what shall De tne enect
Of that proof or general The fact H. may 1t please
your Honors. they are endeavorng to anticipate que
ton which may arise the trial, and winch may nor;
They endeayorng to get an order IN our m ne bad
they 0Fds5 saenp,s s sn III Ss'e %
the direction of aduery but without specific
evidencc-hat is. without any sucn evidence az 10
room iogethcr-wijhout any evidence to prove tnat
on any "Viience that they confessed 10 tee ats & o
adultery at any particular lime they claim that u hey
n nth general evidence II Will not DC al
lowed ia full pR,ct. II will be- allowed just as much
effect With tLe blll OF Particulars ~ 1t wouu without
preposteros as to claim on TIE thar there must be
evidence which shall satisfy the jury that tnis
habitahc world It may be that we shall not De
content to have evidence In which the pialntin
shall admit that This adultery never took place
IN tue world the globe, hut nevertheless ams that
M ns b e baTs IT. may sp 0e be H some we sSr adry
without tIe parties ever meeting each otnrr nave
Ileman certainly desires to be considered sane and
Is considered sane BY us friends un assured 9y one
OF the mast respectable members or the r III tns city
that he has heard this gentleman say that adultery
could be cOmmllled BY paroles who were at the tine Az
Nj Pryor-Chrst said so adultery of the heart.
Mr. Trtry-Is lnat the kind that you are aftcri
Mr Shearnan-EXIctlY. will come TO that. But II
1t pea9c Honor, Lnere very Iemrka9le article
When M m cs r Gg l NAV lMe he HtSnc%d
S sort Vi legal authority In The hdepc"dent ot Dec.
eu.tcd ny me plaintiff this SUIT, there ls very re-
marHduc leading article, one worthy OF being cue in
OF Tt Is On the subject VI adultery 0f the
SOUL l. rs in article when mahtails that Inc courts
ought - grant divorces "r rather tnit divorce ouGI
to granted wlhoat any intervention of the courts
wAo acre II adultery OF tue soul; llc !uu.eery VI
the ont i.iua worse than adultery Ol thc pouy
THIS art Gle Is very etolu mt on tat SUBJECT eXpat
t. great uIury that done to parties VINO are
misira'r w reason OF one or the 0lhcr committing
,,,, il r ne Inc destiny and what the fate OF
parties EIsteued together Dy tne terms of law
nut Whp. nevertheless, not mated ~ tHclr souls
married Out not mated. And II proceeds at great
l. to set fJrla tns theory tnd mere may Do An
tdurv OF the sou! wrcn Jar more guilty thah the
adu - o. tue D0y. and whcI -nOni D. recognized as
,cni.,-in has SAID, tAat tne scrptires do declare
tllt lac mdn Mo looks on Il w'nan 10 .Hst
already his heart Bat t"at Is hardly suh-
ci"u-!; ,a;. -:..r TO r.yag court ot Justicr.
anu therefore whel We com before the iAry We WI.
as. TIA, ..ry . sIt! u tlt adultery "a the 10 ~
WIS cUuni tci AMI rot Drr1!Y Aiuit"ry 0t tle s0d
20 higher Tribunal tnat hlt5 above
81 i- a. IA JG4.., Dclotc tALt Ltindnti tr'sn "Ath
ai"r wc cNrct tie nit wan lpn ul tin u'rAA.i'
Iud roEI wcn We ncrvc, VITA ii our nedr'@ mat ~
nave .; - thea wr WA commit 10 mat trl"nM'I he
Question wst!cf There "i0 auI' cry VI INC SUI. Dus
sc "a not u "-o - sj ,u't lht u aHJ t"It'e utn
them .hy qostlon eStrpt WHEELER Vhie wa ai'I'ciS
~ LAX; coG.i2IGr, Wb!ch l. IN ~, n,
J
T.eii tIcT lore, uecr'aif!J occdiFo AT so' tic anu
I In su.He pace. BIG We do not Say tIaC Wo are
p.u, ~ p1r;p1.hr tlrr or at - particular place
IS. rc.Inc commit Sctyr- To AM sucn prupo7tOA
DrfVgo sos tue tiidi tG l. time ch0lSh % riise
n -, . n,.s on IL. .Ia,l. TIc pdint.t alety
Knows .. lao SPECIFIC evidence except WIN
re.I,IoA O,t. IL and Il. SowIth~t,trns uat aih-
ltvt iic,. PIT H. i.s pr;i.d."rs Lny :rs Iny dai's
tG,t II cah ntuir any tines ia ms DlI Vi
lya,l ne scrv:cc n ~ particular, un We AZ"
ci0se a,,h tar ucghllng % 1 trIa ana now Tic h'is
I 4 tan a. Il
nave c.rced tOE" her, even sauce thdt aiidavit. Io
tnIt VIC DO NOT OiJccf.
TIE SCOPE OF TIE ORDER.
W. simply OBJECT solns 10 trial without any kind OF
notc - ecc and places. If he means 10 prove
any II: a; perfect liberty to withdraw all tho Epc-
cifc lines and PLACES il ~ chooses AMI 70 20 the 1nry
uu lI.sti"ua OF GchrfIi rVdchce' ana ~ II" uoe5
uc Ell 60 oi tiit evidences AT all nothing
waeYer 1casc tie ony c,lf ,'c e. IS ,rn rtts,
t. o, lrrcic, OF anv specific ac, adultery u. any
ot.lcr A" tad place. tntn tLt Whch ne oct, iOrtA IA
H.. rhdt All thc r1 % ~ tis orier' nov" " nr
uAmcs sDrc.c lime. ahi no SPECIFIC pae DuC goes "
strong point, the jury cannot De asked 10 IL the ev
Icnce ~ coAnccton with aly pIr.ictiar une or any
ncnl..s. nSti .s'' b,caa.e he his not uuned any.
T,ry can"1t he a'd'd TO ta,trh t'iIt % ucSh
IL ao~n All, ue p,"iIces taIs evidence oi gtneru
coLao rio ;Ai, e'.,"'e ., S1.il n'I'FI; M .ss %.
,"nrri c.: s-iuu, claims afc ~ cApiiri' a.!
lat ~ A.y. j., proper effect and vii nnt be !ln,cd
! .
very jTa 5f; "n;'t not 20 Jr aIaii3I W..
nu: Is i.u "y.trnc" on OR s:r ~ We can po.""y
prudl.c, taat he dPluuJ.ht never committed III 'se
ffr -, ,irto .o,rt yI,n5r rrDyIng 80 t,r - ~ N
ic II tt,itc iI--, hr da IL - p1s, lie loG Us 10
~. i:r. - '' I-I."It never a. dH q ~ "a Al lF
pace c.ii. NED tlr-r Hct' Is II nos ga We 'r'S"
SHt I'm '.-.;f..... Iho Law shi's her 9iorth.
There notOuI except the t's , tn.ny ,t OF ' tine
,c l,, r.olra ~ trs,,ino.Y or,r t" support ii.
ci. VITA 'ne Larry ne waits ihrriiorI thai 'pocs,s "
{ u
puisI,r. ah tao drft ana 7pc'in' evuenre
ni-T IN. av sirl .',, ana sp .r.ilt l4,'I
i s.Ja let us ..Ye u week Dr'ora Tue rit'
he has Lad na withe'@ Hc ',.l = ~ ~ ~
'cdy: he comnl.ils mat tn'y "tr" Si!nhohrd on
t,ArI orrs- dnd ATTENDED IN c"art. ohrr!y ne knows
wal .Ary W"gc ="In- To te-,A}. ~ Il,S suaue at
aiiiavlt euat he can prove ana what ne cannot
prove. H. doe, ..,t INFORM u; tnat any rh"nsG h1'
not rcp.at IA tne nill OF particulars par! ,,; t's;
yGS g"t az % he mas c.on, s'f '. orr we We me the oa'r
cay 20 i.Ac uIs dfIavt Just ~ 1t wds, ana nave 1t
fnrr, sinudl VI. tak. nls own wori. We 10
taKt statement whcn ho hihi|cl LIs mauc ahd dsA
nOt...s fu.tIrr Ant ~ lOr al! tHo'e ln'Nona cuu.
crrnn. the effect OF general evidence, tao Jui4e wo
tries THIS case viii Dc a1uniInIy aoe 10 'posc o' & ts
when the question arises. II does nor no" iriSe lhiS
IA not tile pace for the uscisaiOh OF any
W. i!.snrc fully submit that there has been nothing
tnu -hoss tnlt moderate order or pai-
order OF ms II nor below Is extremely moderate that
II united even To an extent that Is dangerous 10 us
Your HOnurs viii tnat he Is Only required 10 give
the specific acts Of ainltrry aud under that no
might take wnich wJull be extremely danger
GUS II. ngat prove, attempt to prove, Visit be-
tween the parties under CIRCUMSTANCES Whlcn ne WuuJ
drscsipc ~ suspicious and from which susplci us
jurvnan might infer tnat the lc ltseil was
al that uc and yet he plhutf not claiming that -"
at. ellie act Of adultery place ut that time amt AZ
tuat place, We should stIll fal INTO Trap. Well! Our
eyes open that understand mat we ar" III
that DANGER understand that there Is posSihIuV
eve Vet OF CERTAIN nrIous aud dangerous evidence
| being produced. But have got all tnat we
IN what way can this be dangcrJuy What Is Ia preju-
dice them III requiring tnen II they have any evidence
H. the specific acL-leq lrluS tneui 10 give snort
notice TO us before trial submit this TO your HonOrs,
confident that although appear before two judges VINO