Arizona citizen., 1874-11-07
ARIZONA ELECTION.
have the following reports:

We have the following reports:
 Tn Pima county, there was no special contest made except for Delegate and Sher- if, and we have not been able to get any thing like accurate returns except for those officers.
 In Tucson the vote for Delegate is 324 for Stevens, 1l9 for Smith, six for Bean and two for Hayden: for sheriff, 227 for Oury and 22I for Lee.
 Gardner's Ranch, 27 for Stevens, 13 for Smith and none for Bean or Hayden: 26 for Lee and 15 for Oury.
 Florence, 5l for Stevens, 8 for Smith, and none for Bean or Hayden: fl for Oury and I6 for Lee.
 MonteZuma, 2l for Stevens, 13 for Smith and none for Bean or Hayden: 19 for Oury and 19 for Lee.
 Tubac, 20 for Stevens, for Smith and none for Bean or Hayden: II for Lee and I3 for Oury.
 Pima Villages, IS for Stevens, for Smith and none for Bean or Hayden: 14 for Oury and for Lee. .-
 Apache Pass, 66 for Stevens, for Smith and none for Bean or Hayden: 67 for Oury and for Lee.
 and none for Bean or Hayden; 24for Oury and 14 for Lee.
 Camp Grant, 73 for Stevens, 50 for Smith, 15 for Bean and none for Hayden: 75 for
 Gro Blanco, F for Stevens, ' for Smith and none for Bean or Hayden: Oury 12, Lee 7.
 Pueblo viejo, Stevens 61, Smith 19, Bean and Hay den none: Oury 52 and Lee ?.
 Up to last night, although in, the vote at the precinct of the Silver mountain and Quacharty districts could not be obtained by us, the early departure
 
 ing as usual. Various reports are afioat about it, and m Il c h talk of an eX- cessive vote there, and also the same kind of talk about that of Apache Pass, Pueblo Niejo and to some extent of Grant. Enough is understood to make all fair men ask the next legislature to enact a strict registry law.
 Yavapai reports are: Prescott, Stevens 94, Smith 27, Bean 262; Wickenhurg, Ste vens2, Smith 3l, Bean IA; WilliamSon's valley, Stevens II, Smith none, Bean l9; Peoples valley, Stevens ?, Smith l, Bean S2; Verde, Stevens 27, Smith 2, Bean 47; Smiths mill, Stevens 63, Smith none, Bean l5; CurtiSS' saw-mill, Stevens s, Smith |, Bean 23; Chino valley, Stevens and Smith none and Bean II; Kirkland valley, Stevens 4, Smith none, Bean II; Beaver creek, Stevens 6, Smith none, Bean g; Lynx creek, Stevens 2, Smith l, Bean I4; Walnut creek, Stevens 6, Smith 4, Bean 6. Totals, Stevens 225, Smith 67, Bean 466, and none for Hayden. The precincts Of Apa- che, Clifton and Little Colorado are to be heard from in Yavapai.
 In Yuma county reports are as follows: Yuma, 93 for Stevens, 10 for Smith and 46 for Bean; Gila City, 27 for Stevens, for Smith and l4 for Bean; Mohawk, for Ste venS, II for Smith and for Bean; Castle Dome landing, 5 for Stevens, 24 for Bean and none for Smith: Ehrenberg, 54 for Ste vens, 56 for Smith and l4 for Bean; Castle Dome, l9 for Stevens, 2, for Smith, and 26 for Bean. Total as reported, 204 for Ste vens, S2 for Smith, l25 for Bean and none for Hayden.
 Reports from Maricopa are: Phenix, Stevens 59, Smith S2, Bean 84, Hayden none; Mcdowell, Stevens none, Smith B, Bean l, Hayden none; Tempe, Stevens 52, Smith g, Bean l, Hayden s; Gila Bend, Stevens :, Smith ?, Bean 3, Hayden none; Stanwix, Stevens Il, Smith and Bean l; Styles, Stevens 30, Smith 2S, Bean and Hayden none. Totals as reported, Ste vens l59, Smith lS2, Bean 90 and Hayden s. San Carlos is not yet heard from.
 Although we have no authentic returns from Mohave county and several pre- cincts in Yavapai and Maricopa, there does not seem to be doubt of the election of Hiram $. Stevens, Delegate, by several hundred majority. By next Saturday we hope to have returns sufficiently accurate and full to determine just who are elected, especially in Pima county, although the official canvass will not be made by the supervisors until the 18th.