New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1874-06-21
COURT RECORD.
SATURDAY, JUNE 20, 1874.
Supreme Court.

The following named gentlemen were ap-
pointed by the court committee to ex-
anime applicants for admission to the bar,
VIZ: A. DeBlanc, ESQ, chairman; N. E.
Girard, f. 7. Lewis. Z. D. Estilette, j. M.
Moore, George II. Wells and A. Bailey.
The following named gentlemen were adj
mirted to practice law: Raphael DeBlanc,
Robert Martin, s. Lanaux, J. j. Ducote, j.
NJ. Murph, K. G. Hunter, E. P. Weary, H.
Il: Waddill and John Clegg.
The following cases were decided:
BY CHIEF JUSTICE LUDELING.
No. BIG Julie Cormier VS.. Augustine
Guidry. for plaintiff reversed.
No. $50. Vincent Boagni VS.. Victor lou
amended by allowing in
terest.
No. s3l. Richard T. Eartin vs.. Alfred Du.
perier.-Judgment affirmed.
No. 1873. Arthur Simon VS.. Charles L.
Walker ct al.-Order setting aside the in
junction annulled.
No. S39. Joseph Mallon vs.. Frederick
Gates.-Judgment reversed in favor OF de-
PENDANT.
No. S42 James w. Bradley vs. Lucy J.
Curtis.-Judgment reversed in favor of de-
PENDANT.
No. 846. Eugene Petitin VS.. Vincent b.
acknowledgement affirmed.
No. S5l. NJ. E. Perrit VS.. b. Sanosus.--
Judgment reversed and injunction perpetu-
ated.
No. 855. D. o. Bryan VS.. G. McVey.-
Judgment annulled and case reuianded.
No. $50. j. j. Mistrob & Co. VS.. Z. b. Ne.
ville.-Judgment affirmed.
No. S59. Bodet & Guey vs.. Jules NIbou.
rel.-Judgment affirmed.
No. 696. d. Numez VS.. Thomas S. Wins.
ton.-Judgment reversed in favor OF de-
PENDANT.
BY JUSTICE HOWELL.
No. $40. S. NJ. Philips We. NJ. H. Lyman
Judgment affirmed.
No. S34. l.. B. Cain vs.. s. Loeb.-Judg
ment reversed; plaintiff to pay $685..
No. 84l. Marie Frere VS.. E. B. Mentz.-
Judgment reversed; plaintiff to pay G. L.
Grevenberg $1,000.
No. 843 Valcona Weary VS.. o. Trahan
Jr-Judgment affirmed.
No. S52. E. A. Duchamp VS.. o. Della
Observation-Disclosures affirmed.
No. S62. Julie Guilbeau We. P. S. Wilt
Judgment reversed; defendant decreed the
owner of the property in dispute.
No. 1863. State VS.. SOsthene Hapin.-Judg
ment affirmed.
No. S64. Campbell & Dovcat vs.. William
States, Jr.-Judgment affirmed.
No. S67. Adolphe Berard VS.. c. Young
sheri1f.-Judgment affirmed.
BY JUSTICE WHY.
No. SS. Clarice Roy vs.. Lastie Nogat.-
Appeal dismissed.
No. S32. State VS.. A. Nunez.-Judgmen:
affirmed.
No. 1856. A. Conner VS.. C. Bourq.--Judg
ment amended; plaintiff to recover 1913:
No. 845. John l. Adams vs. Samuel Wake
acknowledgement annulled, and injunction
perpetuated.
No. Si4. Succession of P. Cabrol.-J adg
ment annulled, and case remanded.
No. $40. G.. p. Cross VS.. Frank z. Pa
acknowledgement amended to recognize
plaintiffs privilege, and intervention dis
missed.
No. s53 Succession of A. Mcdonald
Case remanded.
No. s57 H. Belac VS.. G. Dominique
Judgment affirmed.
Ne. $50. State VS.. William HoogeT.-
Judgment affirmed.
No. S65. State VS.. o. Frugi-Ju dgmen
affirmed.
BY JUSTICE MORGAN.
No. 800. J. NJ. Thompson vs.. Thomas
Acknowledgment of non suit affirmed.
No. 1888. s. Webb vs.. a. Z. Keller
Judgment affirmed.
No. 1877. E. Pelagie VS.. Il. Ii. kuttrell,-
Judgment reversed and suit dismissed. JUS
tice Howell dissenting.
No. Sl5. C. A. Frazer Us. T. c. Auder
son.-Judgment affirmed.
No. SiS. T. B. Stevens vs.. f. L. Plrner.-
Judgment affirmed.
No. $50. j. NJ. Pool vs.. l.. Fontelieu.-
Judgment amended, plaintiff to have
Sl420 90.
No. S54. Succession of P. J. Eoperson.-
Judment reversed and case remanded.
No. S5S. C. Provost VS.. w. Provost
Judgment affirmed.
superior District Court.
Judge Hawkins rendered the following
decision:
State ex rel. Albert Baldwin vs.. Antoine
Dubuclet, State Treasurer.-In refusing
the mandamus to compel the Treasurer tt
deposit the State funds in the bank o.
plaintiff, the court said, the board OF Gqui
dation. in electing a fiscal agent, under the
funding bill, could not compel the Treasurer
to deposit the State funds in any particular
place, and that theT treasurer was the lega
fiscal agent. The State funds were not t6
be used or disposed of for the purpose Of
speculation. The practice of banking the
public funds for the benefit of any institu
ton was illegal, and without the SANCTION
of law.
First District Court.
APPROXIMATIONS FILED.
Larceny-Emma June.
Assault and battery = Henry Murray
Albert Whitfield, Lizzie Brown, John
Nolan, William and Ellen Moran.
Obtaining money, etc.-Mary Philips.
CONVICTED.
Dan Lots, of entering in the day time and
larceny.
Fourth District Court.
Judge Lynch rendered the following de
cisiOn:
p. Donnelly VS.. S. T. Goodwir.-Plsintif1
sued for $3.50 rent and seized the furniture
of defendant, who bonded it and took rule
tc set the seizure aside. The Code of 1925
article 2675, gave the lessor a right o1
pledge on the movable effects of the lessee
on the premises. Act of February IL, 1852
amended this, exempting certain articles
See C. c., 27O5 and 1892. The omission OF
exempting the personal rights under G. C.
1892 in C. p. 644 was remedied by act No.
80 of 1872. Article 644 more than prohibits
the seizure OF property under fieri facias
N. s., 337. The law has been changed
since Parker VS.. Stark Gather, and that
does not now apply. The act of 1874 in
creases the exemption and modifies e. Z.
2705 and c. P. Ga. 1t applies to debts due
lessons for rent and to all other classes OF
creditors The privilege Of the lessor ex-
lists after the retention by the lessee OF the
5000 exempted. There is no constitutional
objection to the law. Bronson vs. kinzie,
l How, 3ll; II Wheat, 259; IA N. T., y;
Is A., 1913. Rule made absolute and the
provisional seizure set aside.
The yirginius.
One Of the conditions of the Eirginius