The New York herald., 1874-05-08
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.


ASRAOviA 1VA iO8b Vut W luulVIuuoI AuOlduS lEom
reservation and BY them hauled on ana sold ?
Cook had purchased logs so cut and delivered.
The Court answer the question In the affirm ative
property Is in the United States, the Indians
having only the right Of occupancy the right being
sn sHs u bai and b ~ Inc re
to sell logs cut from theffreservations. The chief
Justice delivered the opinion. vat ,se-D
No. II. Brown VS.. Guild. Executor, and one
other case-Appeals rom the Circuit Court for
the Northern District or Ilinois-Decrees reversed
and causes remsnded for further proceedings
Decision announced by Mr.. Justice Bradley. Dis
senting-Justices Clihord, Mtiier and DAVIS
Opinions TO be delivered hereafter. nasre1
No. a0A Great Western Insurance Company vs..
Fogerty-Error to the Circuit Court for the Southern
District Of New York.-The question in this case
was whether the ARRIVAL In pieces at tne port OF
destination OF q portion OF machinery which was
vent & total loss.1 aIthoush no part OF the ma.
c9inery IVES delivered N such condition ~ 70 be
: the Decision IL that it i'd not necessary to
here should be an ABSOLUTE as s1sncton Sessruc
ton Of the thing insured 90 that nothing of " can
Be sxisd S psees g h 60 @ q .ns sas q S
which was insured In the character Or description
loss. Hence, when machinery was insured-to Wit,
the parts OF q sugar-packing mAchine-and NO part
Is total loss, though more than half the pieces in
number and value may be delivered and would
nass ys9a es Sd
Z No. 1so. Hombuckle ct Al. va Toombs and one
other case.- Error to the Supreme Court for Mon
tana Territory.--In this case the question was
whether the Court erred In trying the case as at
common law, under the Montana CODE aboltshtng
Hss os equas es
The decision Ii that there was no error IN the
Blsay s sSe op Ts Justice
ttces clifford, Davis and Strong. ts M a'-,er-
If. No. 500. Pullman ct al. vs. Roster.-Error to the
Circuit Court for the Northern District OF
nlinots-ln shis case the Court an1rm the power
Of the assessors and surveyors In estimating
p1oa e s sras s1 5a sss4
that those 0cers are not bound In this respect by
peTGa se ssatea n me Of ne dis
NO 2Se. Knappvs. the Troy and Boston Railroad
Company Error TO the Circuit Court Tor the Dis.
trict OF vermont.-In this case II Is held that It
was improperly removed from the State 70 the
Federal Court and the Judgment is reversed and
e he
tice Davis delivered the opinion. .ran ieIl
NO. 25k McQuiudy We. Ware ct aL-Appeal nom
the circuit Court for the Eastern District OF Mis-
souri. i.-This was the an1rmance OF Judgment be-
low, sustaining a. demurrer to McQuiddy's bin nled
70 set aside certain sales Of real estate alleged TO
have been made by, the fraud and collusion OF the
attorneys Tor the appellees the appeiiees having
proceeded to f0reclose paper lpnrporting to be 8
mortgage upon the premises executed by NC
Quiddy. Mr.. Justice Davis delivered the opinion.
No. 2ea. Heine ct a. vs.. Board Of Commissioners
Of Parishes Of Madison and CarrolL-Appeai from
the Circuit Court for Louisiana. This was bill
Med to procure an accounting and settlement by
the Commissioners with the appellants for certain
for the benefit OF the parishes named. The bill was
dismissed for want OF general equity and the de.
the g. opinion justices Cord s. and sWayne dissent
Ing. g ~ ..tr, sg.fA ,....9s 81 r , ee ts,
No. soe., Arcadi vs. State Of Alabama.-Appeal
from the Circuit Court for Alabama. This was the
afnrmance Of Judgment or the State Court, which
held that q law OF the State under whlch Arcadt
parties Who Claimed q 70 Se e.
lotteries, del was unconstitutional and vOtd. and
ss q nss
ieses he being ADVISED tnas the sct o. repeal Was
swayne delivered the opinion. 80 - - '1'''''
4 No. $50. Morgan VI. United States--Appeal from
the Crcuit Court for, the district Of Louisiana.
This is the afnrmance OF . decree dismissing the
IL "a ns m o
cred the opinion. 'it lAr al1f-E s~-
s.No. 2ss Creighton va. Kerr ct ai.--Error to the
Supreme Court OF Colorado. In this case tho Court
anirm . Judgment below, which was brought here
Territory Mr.. Justice Hunt delivered the opinion.
No, 2s7. Osborne vs.. United States--Error TO the
Circuit Court for the Eastern district or Penhsy.
vsnia. In this case the Court hold thas an agree.
ment between surety on . distiiler,s BOND and
bis prnoipai that the bond should not be delivered
until certain liens on the premises should be dis
charged, 90 that the lien OF the government for the
tax which was to accrue should De valid did not
anect the validity OF the bond a. regards the
M % navng notice q the
ION. u 1853 M II 1MIi ENI wade e5s s.-EatJ
No. $50. Warren VS.. Van Brunt and one other
case.-Error to the Supreme Court OF Minnesota.
This was the a1irmance or Judgment In favor OF
Van Brunt, deciding that the title certain lands
S ana not as ses U sS % use s q
Warren. The Chief Justice delivered tho opinion
No. S01. McPnail ct al, vs. Sapsley. Error TO
the Circuit Court TOR the western district OF
Texas. In this cause the Court an1rm q Judgment
in favor OF McPnaii and others for . tract Of land
~ AcLenn0n county, Texas, holding that the
paper claimed BY the defendant here 70 be fraud
ulent power OF attorney. Mr. Justice Swayne de-
ltvered the opinion. ~ sAf Isr s1-76l l'sB
j No. aes. the Township Of Pine Grove vs.. Tai
costs-Error 70 the Circuit Court for the western
district Of Michigan. This was suit on bonds Is
sued ". the township in aid Of the Kalamazoo and
that the act OF she legislature authorizing their
issue was void, a. being In con1ics with the con-
stitutlon Of the state. The Court below held. the
That judement u here afnrmed.r' Mr.. Justice
Swayne delivered the opinion.
No. M Board Of Commissioners OF Boise county
vs Gorman.-Error to the Supreme Court of Idaho.
Writ OF error dismissed with costs.
No. 2S1. simpson W. Greeley, Of sA-Error to