, 1874-10-08

Judge Dioloy, Corporation Counsel, recitod tile
srecial priyilcEes contained III tho city charter
anti olnlr,o'l THO bcnot of them; Tin decision
An important consideration now Ia, the offaot
this decision will have upon tho numerous oases
Chicago has III the supromo Court this torni. It
la presumed that, all appearances having
aSe e Court S''S %, not decline @ ''f' e. coasao essss
them, unless similar motion Is entertained.
But, should tloy bo dismissed, they could DO ro-
instated OH a'writ o. error though i might bo
NECESSARY. IN certain cnscs, 70 obtain Hnpor-
astlng. as showing how lawyers Of tho largest
experience may bo trippel lip OIL d atnto Of facts
which, afterwnrd, ono Ia apt to think, would
hardly oBcapo Students attention.
ILLINOIS nurhnnh ,t,:,1a,, counr, NORTHERN GRAND
OTTAWA, Ill, Oct. 7.-Tho Supreme Court met,
pnrs.iant to adjonrnmont with all tho Judges
proB0nt.
MOTORS DECIDED.
A1a. Stewart Mel ". bon Alon1a Cummings nr'-
peal from Livingston. Tiule exieniel live days for
appellant 10 fe briefs.
..70t: Tho City. Of chrago vi. MeFer. Motion to
ns amas areaa dcnod and tho caFo stricken from tho
Licenses win 10 aranted to y. A. Warro and 0. Il.
pltcher 10 praoieo.
40. William Edwards III. Tho Farmers insurance
,;e,,ap company appeal from Warfen Motion by tho up
IeltCo III lilo HflGlH.
100. George 4. Froar, impcu'ed etc., ya. Tho Com
oo,gt ',s q 3.,,c cooI. 1' saI,9 ,..ot!on; -
osoaa ass as faa Gosi aoa
pellce for learo 10 Ills additional record.
oa @ ~ Hol III aso m oe Ii Raxa s n H.
aI; Tal;ns fal,es Chr % Company vs: ,Sl Mi'l'9m s
o. E'ss i ~ %iddleiaaa @ i a VI Tho oh,eaRc 8
Sn sfSs law selo soas sfsSa a o 70 ao I @
700. Tho Ilinoia Central Railroad Company vs. Pat
'1Se HoSeaos esa II % ssss ppsss to 5o T. Andrews
aud John w. alut}rae to practice on foreign license.
GALL. OF THE nocKEr.
a0l. Thomas l.. Hnmphreyiito ~, Culver, Page,
moyno co.,i appeal from superior Court Of cook.
10. 6hates nraa1ey oys; John r + Dar,or; nppca1
Superior Court Is Cvolt. Tatcn.
FROM aa sneror Ss 81 cas M 9Ss" on sa
4o5. David ii. Ford ys. Tue David n: Ford Manu-
fneturng Company alias Tho ohloago Water at.d Gas
En- oqrsy IN appeal from Superior Court Of cooa
Ioo Lydia i. Cole III tho atsor Of tho will Of Ea.er
Il. Taller, doceasca appeal from Peoria. Tatien OIL
lo7. josiah D Bradley vs. Jamcs II. higgins ap-
peal from pusoau. Taken on call; st.
4o3. Andrew Gosso ". Cyprla Jouea appeal from
bureau. Taken Oh call.
4oa Gi.y of oaeida Va. Ralph voria ot al.; npncsl
4l0. Auguat Fisher Natioual anlt Of Con,1nercG
Of Chicago; appeal from Superior Court Of Conk,
Taken call.
III. pittsburg, Fort Wayne 4 Chicago Railroad
Company ct 81. vs. Chester Iazcn appeal from Coo k
Taken MI call.
liz. 1dttsbnrg, Fort Wayne + ChiraEo 1lailroa<l
pcriur Court Of Cook. Taken OIL call, ....
Ill., Edwin a. Kendall vs. Samuel 4. Brown appeal
frGn Warren. TakcI, OH call.
ill., Marcus ne!slcn Va. John r. Enuia appca1 from
RINK. Taken OH call.
4lH. John T.. 9antzaFt 70. William Hoge: appeal
from Cook. Takcn OH call.
4l6 Stewart Niyl ". Don Alonaa Cummings; nI,.
peal from Livingston. Iimo extended five days ia
dle hriefa, and fakeu. -.
417 Hurry saltsnan w. o. 7. DlHsell ct al appeal
from Lyiugs.on saInc.
4is Robert plckere VI j. T. Taylor and A. ]. Tay.
lor; NJ peal frbn, Wonaforl. Dis>usua ns.
4l9. aunu Higgins w. Winfield III. Bullock: appeal
fron NuoafayA. Taken.
420. Joseph Morley vs.. Tho Town Of 31oiau,orn
nppeal from W9pdforl. Timo exton1ed I've days tt
nlo hrlofs, and takcn::
ADJOURNMENT.
Tho Court ndjournod until O'Clock to-morrov;
morning.