, 1874-08-28
They Agree to Recommend that tho
Firo-Limits and Oity-LimitB
Be 0o-Extonsive, =.


ncuI,io ut intge wcrp nnxiDns to learn wliat Dis
poal!lon would DO made Of ttht Important mat
| ter.
! Aid. Sciairncr. reai an ordinance drawn by the
| City~Attorncy, making the iirc.1inits co-extou-
! sivo with tlioso OF tho city. Tho ontilo docu-
! mcnt has already icon In print and was referrcd
to tho COMMITTEES BIZ tho Couuei some sitne ago.
AID. Cannon HAs opposed to tho section Of tho
oidiuance compelling poor people to ray for tho
| Insertion OF advertisements Of notices Of re-
moyal. Personal notices would e,Bwer fully rs
we'll. antt would cost much less.
THO acction providing tint wooden buildings
| b1,nli not DO moved from lot to lot within tho
city-n,ts without duo notice met with son,o
oploeition. soyetal Of the Aldermen ob1ecting to
glyo tho Bouul of rubiie Worha discretionary
poNor.
AID. Spauld,ng moved that the nro.lisnlta bo
Eaat1p co-bxtenslyo with tho GltY~ilMtn
AID. Cullelt ton said Ao would uot voto for any
aueh motion Until no know what wcro tile ro-
limits "clo a!reauy co-cxtensiyo with thu limits
Of tllo city, but thoie wns 10 penalty Tor ah ill.,
traction.
Aid. schnfner suggested TINT tho Council 10
recommended to Instruct The Police aud Firo
Commissioners to examine tue roofs VI buildings
construc. cd sinco lhu Hro, aud report Oh the
1uatoriAl ueel.
ALL. Oullorton nail thcro ongLt to DO son,o
proyiHion made for tho pnymcnt of competent
inch to do tho proposed work before tho Poitcu
and lilu Cotnmipsluuora woru ilatruo.od to pro-
| coed.
Assistant City-Attorney Cameron, being pgcB-
cn:, Wus akel II lilo tlrc-lntH Noru cu.extesiYp
with tho oty-lfnits.
1Io replied in t,n Affirmative, but Hald that
tllere waa 10 penalty for an ilfruotion Of tllo
Inv outside Of tho old limits.
| Aid. CAnnon inquired it person could ho
stopped from erecting fla,uo building outside
| OF tie old lii a-liluits,
! AIr Cnmoruu replied thnt he could not 10
| legally stopped
Ad Stone asked, If tito penalties Of tho old
| ordinance were extended to the now, would tho
! latter Do 9 valid law.
| llr. Cameron sail it would he,
Aid. suuafrncr thon moved tlat tho Chair 10
instructed tu prepnro aud report to tho Council,
! Monday evening i cruJcr amendment iacornor.
atiug Into tho III CHI lit livg~ortiuauce ali tho non
ALTOS Of tho old ordinance.
The motion prevailed by voto OF to 3, Aid.
| Cullcrton Cannon, aud 6c4lnitz voting iii tho
| uegulya.
Kid, Foloy moycd that tho Coronation Couusol
| bo instructed to prepare proper ilrs-ortlinanco
| for presentation to tho uoxt meating OF the
| Council.
| Aid. schnfrncr could not rec tic noceaeity Of
! tho motion. 1he Committee had bec1 appointed
| to consider ordinances already drawn, not 10
| dsaw n HOW ono. lIc was not i'll favor of going
any further In that Iaalter boforo reportug
| prog4 oss 10 the Council.
Several rop,onatrnucos of citizone a9ajnst tho
extension Of tho ro-llm!ts were p!acotl on illo
An ordinance introduced into tic Council by
AID. srous, providing for tho repeal OF the or1-
lance extending tho tre1iuiits to tho ctylin,itB
! wan lloxt considered.
AID lfoicy moved to njace Ii on flo,
AID Cullorton moved TINT tho Council be
! recommended to adopt It, his leasou hoing TINT
| the other ordinance was very Imperfect and a.
| sortied no production to citizcns. lilo fayoYcd
extending tho limits OF t4o ire-tlistrict to the
city-linlla buA not until tbero wnu proper Inv