The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-10-13
NEW HERALD TUESDAY, OCTOBER H. 1874ouADKurLr SHEET

BpGCttVt Oh pOfftCa1 tHIHKtUK
OF how they can better their condition than about
politics, third term or any abstract political
BUYpIsroN, JANIS, Fan River, Mass, republican,
u In fayor OF third term Tor Grant II the party
BuNpY, H. 8. OHIO. republican. WIN be better
able TO say what he Will do In the next Presiden-
tal campaign when the time comes.
BURoHARD, hoRATio g., Illinois, republican, con-
sders two terms many as = President should
serve, and yet there might arise an emergency
when 1t would be wise 60 re-elect, even Tor third
term, ana In such an event he would support
Grant
BUaLRIaH JOHN H.. South Berwick. Me-, repub-
lican. In favor OF but ole term, and thinks the
republicans OF his state, realizing the EVIL OF the
reelection OF . President. would Internationally
BURROWS JULIUS c.. Michigan, republican, OBJ
jecss to limiting the term. and is IN favor or
does not anticipate such an emergency, but II
nominated, would support Grant.
lican, is IN favor OF any number Of terms up to ff
teen, II the people wish man TO serve them az
BurLna, r. r., tennessee, republican. In an
emergency demanding Grants re-election would
favor third term and support hum. :.
CAIN, RICHARD H., Columbia, 3. o., republican. III
the people prefer Grant for their candidate IN 1879
ne would not only be in favor OF third term but
would support him most cordially.
CALDWELL, JOHN H., Alabama, democrat. The
democrats OF Alabama are against third term
for anybody and viii insist most eloquently and
effectively. ne hopes, In the democratic nominee
CANsoN GEoRas q, Utah. Mormon Opposed 20
OF expressing the Mormons.
CANNON, JOSEPH G.. TuscoIa H., republican, is
not prejudiced against third term to that extent
that no would not support the nominee OF the
party.
in the event Of the dlrest calamity could he
imagine Grant again selected, and sucn calam-
Ivy he should suppose would make him support
CESSNA, JOHN Bedford. Penn, republican.
Should Grants denomination be considered neces-
sary 70 save the country he would certainly sup
port him.
OHAFpEE, JEROME B.. Colorado, republican The
CHipans, NORTON F., District Of 1 Columbia, re-
publican, sees no objection to a tnlrd term what
ever. II the people desire to re,elect President
third time there Is no reason why they shouldn't
DO so, Just as much as continuing Senator In
ONCE consecutively: Il the party should renom-
CLARK, AMOS, IT.. New Jersey. republican. is
opposed TO third term and to Grants renom-
In alton and reelection II nominated.
CLARKE JOHN b.. JR.. Missouri, democrat, Is OPP
posed to third term, as he believes the people Of
the country are.
few, he imagines, would advocate third term
under any circumstances ana with the machinery
aspirant as another, expediencY even could not
make Grant candidate Tor q third term.
l,can II the rennoscan party should renompate
Grant an act he does not consider prObaDie-he
would have no hesitation to support him.
favor OF third term what ne would do il he were
nominated he is Eee to say, could be better
CLYMKR, HESTER, Pennsylvania. democrat Is
opposed to third term.
COBB. STEPHEN A., Kansas, republican. Is not
alton Of Grant In ONCE. Knows OF no reason now
why he should declare what he would DO ii Grant
CoBB, CLINTON L., Elizabeth City, N. o., republi.
can. declines to express an opinion either one
cate his views in 1870 HIS people, however, are
strongly IN favor or Grant.
COBURN, JOHN, indiana republican, Is against
hfrh
for third term.
COTTON AYLETr R., Iowa. republican, thinks two
Iowa are opposed to . third term, but conclusions
to-day may be changed by circumstances.
COMINGO ADRIAN, Missouri, democrat. A candt-
date Ior third term would unite the solid strength
OF the democracy and gam many republicans.
candidate again. There is too much good sense in
the country to seriously suppose this question WIN
Cook PHILIP, Georgia, democrat. The only
third term Grant can possibly have IL to be the
thirst Tor ONCE is SO great be win undoubtedly be
our candidate, and II we can beat republican
tnir Ii term. and viii support nim-you bet.
C0RwIN, FRANKLIN. Illinois, republican. He does
not believe the name will be thought OF, and has
NO idea be will ever be required TO support Grant
Tor third term.
Cox, s. s., New York, democrat, is in favor Of
Elliott (c0ored) OF South Carolina, Ia made Chief
Justice, SO that he could "swar him in.n other
much az he
loves him, even Il the republicans were vain
s1 SGqd n
third term on party principle, and ieels conf
dent the republican party will never renomInate
Grant
CRITTENDEN, THOMAS j., Missouri, democrat, is
In favor OF one term Tor democrat and no more
for republican President
CROCKER, ALvAH, Fitchburg Mass, republican,
Is opposed to q third term. He could not say what
he might DO IN the event OF denomination, bus
CsooKK PHILIP S. Brooklyn. N. Y. republican.
Ii not favor OF third term, and feels perfectly
sale In saying ne would not vote for Grant II nom
GRASSLAND, EDWARD, Kentucky, democrat. Is
an orthodox Kentucky democrat and opposed to
CRoUNsE, LORENZO, Nebraska, republican, has
no opinion to express at present on what the
party MAJ, DO or what ne would do II Grant was
CauTCAFIELD WILLIAM, Chattanooga, Tenn, re-
publican. Representing the Third Tennessee dis
trict the people OF which are opposed 10 military
man serving a third TERM he could not support
Grant II he was renominated.
CURTIS, CARLTON b., pennsylvania, republican.
Two terms and no more. Grant cannot DE renom-
mated, and would not be supported 4 nominated.
DAsFoRD Los s, OHIO repuDucan; op,,
enough. and is sure Grant VIII never be
thought OF as Q candidate.
not committed against q third term. but cannot
say what the party will do. His judgment Is that
Grant win not be renominated, but II ne Is he VIII
Sxv., ]. j., West Virginia. Independent demo-
GRAFT 1t will take him some time 10 make up his
mind whether ne Is Ior third term or not.
DAVIS, ALEXANDER NJ, Virginia, democrat,
cannot ioretell what the republican party may do.
The democracy are ali opposed to the third term
principle.
DAWES. HENRY L., Pittsfeld, Mass, republican.
In conversation with this gentle nan he evaded
lori" when asked n he was In favor OF third
term ana to the other points he answered, Ger
tainly," smiling all the time.
DE WITT, DAVID NJ, New York, democrat. One
term Is enough for anybody, democrat or repuD-
llCan.
DOBBrNs, SAMUEL A.. New Jersey republican,
would reserve his opinion until the possibility or
the denomination was nearer on hand.
DOMAIN, WILLIAM g.. Iowa, republican, believes
In the eligibility OF Grant Tor q third term, aud
though ne cannot predict what the party may do,
mated.
DUELL R H., New York, republican, IL not only
opposed to third term, but would carry that OPP
position to the extent OF working aud voting
against Grant n renominated.