New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1874-05-19

Ant.-Fr0m seventh District Court. Judgment
No. 5044. James Longstreet ". Marsh Denman
Co., appsllants.-Ffom Sixth District Court. Judg'
No. 3344 q. n. Hansell ". J. A. Pctert ct al, ap-
pellants.-Frem second Judicial District Judz'
! ment reduced to el2l 20, and affirmed.
By JUSTICE WHY
No. $3.50. Louisiana State Bank ve. Hibernis
| Bank, appellant.-From Fourth District Court.
Suit to recover loss on forged cbecks This case is
~ nas w. fser loss on to
| fendants. Judgment annulled.
No, $3.50. succession Of John X. Elsee:-From
| interocutory order. which can not work IN IRE
| parable injury il dismissed.
| From Second Dis rict Court Judgment snnulled
John Black ham to be guardian Of Philomens Sar
niguet and put in possession Of the property
Riley, appellant.-Flom Filth District Court
| Judgment annuled, plaintiff to recover $50 and
No. 45l6. 3. Newman vs. L. II. Levy. appellant
| From sixth District Court. 4. Newman not being
| cited the appeal is dismissed
vinst-This case is Ike Meyers vs.. the sheriff; 81
A., r7a. See also Penn ve. Garland A.. 3ls. Judg'
nissd %sed and the INJUNCTION S % perpetnatea 's
No $500. Jacob whetstons va 8. N. Rawlins, ap.
| pelsut-From Fourth District Court Judgment
affirmed, with ten per cent damages for frivolous
10. ses'. James Ready, appellant. vs.: city Of
ton to dismiss appeal from Judgment on the ner.
| its denied; on the exception granted.
oo s1enth ~ b!trct conrt Jadsmsnt
| affirmed, with ten per cent damages for frivolous
| appeal
From sixth District Court. Suit for years salary.
plaintiff having been discharged without cause.
Judgment for plaintiff affirmed, Justice Morgan
No. 35O6. Pounts Brother vs.. Anguste Reggie.
| appellant.-From Second Judicial District Juds'
No. s5o5 same vs, same.-Judgment affirmed.
| No. 4446. Bernard Duthul va. Thomas Fsucett,
| appellant. Judgment affirmed. with ten per cent
No. 4O5 spearipg L Co., appellants. vsL succes-
| sion Of John Zacnarie.-From Second District
ments Of q promissOry note. % A., %; Parson .
| Bills. 23 "a. Judgment afhrmed.
BY JUSTICE MORGAN.
No. $3.50 Heirs OF &. A. Johnson, appellant, vs..
defendant a. legatee Of George W. johnson was to
/ manumit slaves beQueathed him 1t the end of five
| years aud send them to Liberia. He 'emancpated
!! them in 1865 under the military order. He could
not have done 1t in 1861. It was not In his power
to send them to Liberia. The conditions Of the will
| appear to have been carried out Judgment at
No. sass. Mathilde Morrison, appellant. vs. Citi.
zens' Bsnk.-from Sixth district Court: The jndg
The sl IL Iii essential. A s 1eaai1ed G
By the law seem to have been complied with. Juds
No. 1928. Henry Reashaw vs. Mary Ann Wells
a,pellsnt.-From q, Seventh District Court. Judg
| no. 3322. Levy Sugar Va. Mayo. Hodge Co.
appsllants-From Fourth District Court Juds
No 34Os. simon Netter, appellant. va. s. Herr
| mann.-From Sixth District Court Judgment al
| frmed.
Rousclin appellant.-From Fourth District Court
| Judgment reversed
| hausen.-From Fifth District Court. Judgment
setting aside the SEQ uestratiOn of plaintiffs money
deposited by defendants reversed.
| No 4374. Mrs. Emile HOa vs. Mrs. Mary Clancy,
| appellant-From seventh District Court Judg
ment affirmed, with ten per cent damages
$751; John vs. sy Of
ment in favor of plaintiffs contract OF paving
aN%sS No ssio G. g. sauvinet va. Thomas L. Maxwell
appellant.-From Eighth District Court. The feet
Of andrew Hero should be taxed as costs. Juds
me%' So s3a5 A' Rochereau vs.. Bertha Lewis. appel
lant-From Fourth District Court. The exception
of his tenders should have been sustained .Juds
No. 3276. Charles Gallagher, appellant vs. George
Connolly ct al.-From Seventh District Court
NJ. 335S Crescent Mutual Insurance Company
vs. Stephen Allen. appellant. From Fourth Dis
trict Court. Judgment affirmed
Keitfer eff s1 srothers.%From ii Fourth District Court
No. 4462 George W. Byrne VS.. Thomas Fsucett
| appeant.-FroIn Fourth District Court. Judg
ment affirmed, with ten per cent damases-
| No, 3ls5 Factors and Traders' Insurance Com
| pany vs. Charles OeLassus, appelant.-From slA
| district Court Judgment reversed.
Nos 1923 to 1854. City of New Orleans vs.. Rooer
| Abatt ct ais, appellante-FrOm Superior Dlstrlc
| Court. Three days extra time from Saturday wer
allowed to file the transcripts They were MED o.
| Wednesday. sunday counts as day, and there
fore they were too late. The appeals are dis
| missed.
Superior District Court. =,
A. Eyrich vs.. Charles Cinton.-Petition tor mar
| damus to compel the issuing of warrant for S lhO
| due him for the first quarter OF 1874 as tax as
| SCISSOR. Rule nisi ordered returnabe May Il
| John L. Macaulay vs. Charles CHnton.-Petihol
| for maudamus to compel the payment or lnteres
on eighty bonds of the par value of As 900 issue
by the State under acts Nos IS of 1885, lO8 OF l86
| and So of 1870. Cause ordered to be shown MAY z
. Orleans Ere Company No. 81 VS.. Peter Ackel
man. treasurer.-Suit for balance of S l2l 2S
superior Criminal Court.
| E. Rodriguez, petition es for habeSs corpus, allie:
| ing that he is confined for violation of act No
the selling OF lottery tickets other than those
the Louisiana State Lottery, for which the JustiC
imposed fine of $25; that the law is unconstit'
tional its object not being expressed in its title
Judge AtOcha reserved his decisiop. ne r
marked that 1t was with great reluctance that
mad listened to the case. Another judge had give
a decision in cases involving precisely the sam
issues and ne desired to examine that decision b.
fore rendering his 1t will save labor by readir
that opinion and if this court agrees with it, ths
opinion can be easily expres ssed If it disagree
then the reasons should be given at the same tim
First District Court.
PLEADED GUILTY.
! Petty larceny-JOe Alexander alias arigny.