, 1874-10-01
LOCAL MISCELLANY.

the Siten's ~e5 thf ffs
n1aiuaus 10 f1lo tho dopoetions already takon.
rIssse ,,oro yrraont " oonnuo,. 1r,Inoc md
,,,s,.s,,a.,,or ,v1,, cotaf,r tTr II Sfornc
MT np'ons w. ns"D 49,. ,.-a ~ .D ,stor'
solicitor for Mr. perk'ns: WHO hRs a large inter
cot In tho land Mr. Patton, who spoke for
r,okey l. .Cau,Gcll attorneyB for Mr, Faruell;
s,,a r.o,. pm;t], wfo Ia oIao 1ook}nc aftor tho
;aterest- ot t,,o tlefc,,ant and Mr.. Wl,ito, a,1~
plher party 10 THO pu't.
III, rAuK
ro.en t,,e motion for tha .,le snytug that thero
oar. IN ssrt,-no, tx,,;rh Ia would probably
"aa .oa. =. 'os, as"I '.1,a1 " mil l,ouco vanted
ondoaTor TO baSo qaathoas "Au nouNs ,..1
tho of'dcnco hicu 30 thas " co"'o ~ o~
a,.ro5 h, i1,-vo lin .ann1ioation deferred on nc
oa,,,,, -, ,ha ;,,1,,,,tv NJ Mr. CaulAod or Judge
cout's VI teo 4a"p1''.5 ~ I..,,or hn,no encoccd
plckoy to DO pfoeon8, 'no 4o.nsss rar1 .rd H.
IN tho trial OF case Do1ofo anuho Wv. y NAM NV
lattnr IN attendance at tho Supreme Eourfs saoy
having somo objections to mako to tho motion.
",'. ,N',0 49, x,,r. ~ .oo,o Inv,
said It had bcou his oes's" ~ u'o,' Nv ao1lo ~!
for tho suppression Of tho Testimony on tho
ground that It rau ecandalo1's and not material
10 !no lssnuo ,.n,,e1 IN linn at 4 oclook rucsdav
cas1on "a' AAt.1 a%~ ,aa h, M ,1,,o n cona,aor
afternoon and no naa n"o ~ .',uo " eona'ue'
It, na did not think thcro should be any habtc:
frA5
~; III II uinen it wan takon mud tIore certainly
cn,,,I In no roason for laato In putting the tes
t;nsnny o,, lllo 30 that uo might get copy.
m tho ot,,or baud ho thought it quito NATURAL
snend,ions tostimonv, end to determine wl.ethor
thc testimony was u,atoria to tho Issues, should
~ d,,ly consaored. lIo wished to sny further, In
o.v3cr tint lo might not bo misunderstpou, thnt
tuesday 10 lot tho matter stand. over
nnti Saturda7 morning; and ho had 'had
q rort of iudej.,ito arrangement be-
Toro hat that it uhould pc hold in aboyaneo un
iii after he rot through With hia Supreme Court
niicatlon be- continued until Saturday, or wcck
[rn,n ,hat ,lav.
lin. .rA0E
did not think tho rcaaouy Btstod rcro applicablo
ss,a M prcnasation Of nroofa or anything OF that
kiw{ hlt It vas for a rute'to bring boforo tho
f,nnrt too4;,nnnv which had been taken by the
ronnlsinaut III caso uct forhoarlnC on tho
iI;rd nIondnv in October. Most unqucstonably
H. a,,dnanc ,sh,ch vna n,itp yo},,1upous, ought
not to bo brought In Rt thu Inst moment, WHOM
,t,o connn ,vnn rolDf! 10 trial Time should 10 al
nwef1 to hive cories mndo. II tho gontlomcn on
T." n,ior s;dc wnTo willing to stnlnte TINT,
10 cn,nnar;son. tho copY Mr. Lo hfoyno
bna WA correct, hp would be satisfied.
s,Ie oi}scln1 testimony WEB npcded 30 that 1t
,nn1d hn oYaminoa, Whether it was hcandalous
sr not did not interest bis clients. Wnat ho G was
ti,o suit hanging over it, mud could not DO real
izo1 ,1i,ou. IhS suit had benn Bcrons damage
" h;s cSInn,s and Ihoy did not wish to ho further
Involved by auy outside poraonal consdcration1a e
6as but lust that tho testimony should DO 1i'ou,
in order that lo might tako stops to suppress
.,,nl, nor,;nna ri iE as Ytcro considered irrclc-
gant.
'0A'' mn. 1ts1cEcupocKEn
,o,,orbna TINT Il was doubly necessary TINT tho
tos.mnnv In filed tint o might learn wlat it vas
ond mako preparations to tako dispositions,
nnn,bor of tho witnesses being non-rosidcnta.
S1,a rcaRors nf Gen, Smith for d postponomont
.aa,,c5 tn he irroleyaut to tho motion. Tho
Ennrs ro1{i mt know what to suppress In tho
tne1;mo,1y n]ess It vas filed, or huw M Older to
s11nt,rcss would roach thom. All ho cared about
ho would like to have an opportunity to talo
Testimony, 60 that when the caso Wsa ionchoa 1t
could bo heard without delay.
LII. PATTON
rejonea tha. netoso nI tt,o ,to oat;ouv Inn liz;
s.v " inp fo m oionrn,nout should DO con-
s;dnrci
aE:. s,1,Tn ....-
did not propnhe to snise tho anesson .. n' ~,
sion nt tnat thne' NV n,, ,nt oive how any
49, III ,rl,'id IL ,rcdce by lottins tho motion
RI oyor for a lYook. Tho Testimony had boon
takon il, tho presence OF az tho connsel. or ~
least tho greater paia VI an INV ,,,n,,nd
~ @1. ts "aH tha fliur in such arncr az
would onoraso to tho prejudice Of Mr. Farwoll.
NIr Knichcrbocker said tho question :! seemed to
bo only ono Of ocasy aug nc s oh9mt'en rnt ~ tnas
Whhs ten: sn.n 'nr,aasd nnu ..nnd nnt he bcfro
w. w. eaiIva'.sbo, Ga""a t,1nn
tao ~o0'S |N r,rE counr
,,,r,,,a IN 1;cnomn7 Of Tia motion. that 60
tsu - 80, annnrneHion Of testimony van con-
aas a. tho o cna nns reuuire that until ta eyi-
,,na ~ i,cfoTo him but te application to
m" 1tn Tnoiio1, ou eccouut OF tue abBonco
ce,uuo " 1soi ~ was ono Which he should regard.
Ea,rteny r to them II theY desired to be hoard,
rn,,uirci TINT l,c should defer tho lloarng until
au.', l,I reaynnnho ~ flr,o 40 they could bo heard
T'ou ~ un;l tmnrefoya postpoue t!to hearing Of
~ ,i'o opnt;rnt,pn Until Saturday morning.
'''o -
=, -sr,-nrrANcv An ORGANIZED
Ii 4a9n sr1.eSroM u,ue1T m c9Trhgop
P&oEESatU5n - ~. C5.saoo ~ T,s1,,n..
10 tie Editor Or 1"s ."saHv 1''v"s4'
Gtn: Permit INC to re'ato some OF ny e1poe'-
cocc in feeling tho hungry, hoping thereby to
tIro, sono lleht Oh tho above qucstIon.
n,'.;.'s 49, ,,,at scn.on tho caila at nv houso
uurlns 80 psos p.'.as h., .,,n.bo,,o1 mon Win
(No. 227 Lake aSeuae) Z n.1 ..'sA' ~,
have aeked for food. Claiming that tAoy couia
not obtain work, have boen very frequent, aver