New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1874-08-08

PLANS OF Mr.. TILTON AND HIS WIFE
NATURE OF TIE LEGAL ROcEEDINGs-cohMENIS ON
Az OLD LETTER-AIRs. TlLrON OUT OF IV"N'
A TRIBUNE reporter called yesterday upon
erJudee 8 D. Morris, Mr.. Tltou's counsel to learn
ba, ,rorress had been made IN the preparations Tor
NJ Titon,- threatened suit against Mr. Bcecher Mt
Morris sad that be had great deal Of matter 10 *
anime N connection with the case. He had not Jc'
repared any OF the papers Dut thought they "ouiu
ready in a few days. and would DO served upon ~
Beecher's counsel next week ILe sult NoI4d D' .
suit for damages against Mr. Beecheg on cH'IEe VI
criminal conversation with Mrs. Elizabeth X IIlJoh
and II vii! be carried At the drst session Vi '"o %
preme Court in October The amount Of damages I'D 'o
claimed said Mr. Morris had not yet been hXed' oI u
would he in proportion 70 the gravity oi he oH'N''
The suit would be carried on vigorously ana Win 40
little delay as possible on IT. Ti!ton' -ide'
W,tu regard to The report that Mr. Tlon was ousy
upon AN Their formal statement for pnoHeAu'u' 'i''
Morris Al id that 50 far ne knew, Mr. Ilton nAu n'
been at WORK upon regular statement certainly Ho"o
had eeu suppressed by his advice. II was not unAo'
tina. other letters IN addition those published dre"''
would be- given to the pablo by MI 4Alon - i
few days. 81,
some Of Mr. Becchers friends claim that the letter %
Nj TltOn 10 Mr. Beecher, written Nov 80 1901 ""oH
contained the strongest professions Of do'o'eu
SHIN and affection for Mr. Beecher. was not prompted
]
been made public by Mr.. Tton's counsel ana was p''
u.bed IN THE TRIBUNE yesterday In the hfst Pai' -
the letter the following sentence occurs
Twice nave now been unwngiy forced 20 aPp AZ
as your antagonist before tho RaDc, w rienisAp
ve3r. apart AFTER the first. am sure our ~ 80 s
instead of being MANNED was .tTehsl hohrI, am
last, II l may guess yOur heart Dy khos.n- N''-0'
re rho old love WAKES Instead OF WAuos'
NJ Tutons friends say explanation that the le''o
was prompted by Mr. Tiltons regret at the necessity 0
onnosing Mr. Beechers attitude IN regard 10 CERTAIN
rticaI questions Mr.. Beecher's advocates SAY on 80.
other hand, that Mr.. Iilion, just before "finS
letter had been freely charging MI Beecher win '
morality I'm conversation with his associates ana 'n'
This letter was either insincere or was written unu
,,enence of A transient feeling OF cOntrlloh iot 'Ho
FLANDERS he had uttered against Mr. beeohei' III '"
following sentence OF the letter they claim 70 nnu ""
nrmatiOn OF this view go ,.,
Now therefore, want 70 say that ~ either ioms
or ateiy any word Of mine, whether spoken OF Pini
,er mn lic or private mas given you pain OF regret,
blot 10 yOur memory, hAu AZ ~ P1''N "
forgiveness Tor my sdk" A..
r,o, Ira r. Wheelor counsel for Mrs Tllton desired
IL TO be explained yesterday that the separation Is h
matter for the courts 10 decide DuI one Vi "i"
agreement between the two The amount OF ProPo'J
mat Mira TIton wOuld thus obtain must be setteu "
nptua agreement IN papers OF separation IL NiS
unon tins fact that the statement was maze III Inn
,,r,.p that upon an amcable separation depenuou
A., Tlton's chances Of obtaining support Tor herSe"
I'd .htldrenp MI Wheeler declined to make any otnei
.,atement than that gwen aDcye-that IN mutual
paration the provision as TO support dependeu upon
the agreement OF the two persons 80.
Mrs Tilton has left Brooklyn Tor ie" uhyS W ,.s'
,,onds M, very far from city. Mr. Oyington Win
o.o family .he has been staying. told TRIBUNE re-
norer last evening she desired not to have mention
made of the place where she is staying and the tune Vi
her absence Is uncertain She Is not with her chureu'
and her return 20 the q; VI, rs deSegmiaed BY We