, 1874-12-03
THE CITY.
MAHER-FARWELL.'l

REVIEW or THE OAsIs
Tho MRher-E -Earwcll casc, nf.er hnvinB dragged itA
e!ow leugth along for year, auh httes having
heen matto 10 io Hprycn III tho clect!onH, 70 hhp dc-
strov Mr. rsrwcil. has a. lsngth bccn consigned Ia
anI,ysou by The Decision of Jgn Williams, published
yesterday Nov Atahor stsal peAler FHr"e no more,
nor dcilght hin own imagination any lnngnr with
a:uaus OF nulot nd age afier ltfa Of nokct hses.
IN tho mansion built from tl,e rrocuods 0f those 80
urcs parucy Carlt e not gcs slsco os tho hootyas
reward for hts less acauncn and forensic eloqucncc,
III II IN II lie were to e rcwardad In my oyunt Of
ct fact thorn il information Hutccnt to form
,te1Icf Tho Trlsae heirs aud o.herR III po'sossion
VIII rest In ecace Fnrwcll will 70 the even enor Of
Ia vzy Just rs II Hugh arnhcr did not exist.
The ttaler-F -Farwen case Is II
aouAa1.ru,lL.o CHARACTER.
a,ort rcytew Of It lcty will nut therefore be Without
It's interest," II ls os eScry day that Representative
IN tho United states Cpngrcsa ts sic for gambling
aett by Hugh a1alcr. scpt IL, 1871, Hugh Alaher
cen1iacpcol sut in clapcery, alleging I'll
hts bill that in Noyem'sr aas5 nsef "a anh ~ NE r
s3p a9 norlh nsi,go 49, eaat u ~ third pssaG'Ia
s9en, nls',, IN r11,g ,nn f tson % tat line 10 So o lids
Waen lie ,ass ,myst large Que, q $.40o Nss y
sr. ~ 'I Pri to por IL, 1sG hahor boaah: out Won;
.s. and necasre a'nns es.'eA 70 tlie decd, when a
a. payments ws5s NJ ss @ re oe ,a9s
da''' however, ''s''er pa'sr ~ Ss 81 nsssa' s
forS 7or-tl.at Nalh ting ds't won by Ehrrcl from
uiccs.n For shs drb.. ii aher aa thst Easwel hold
his pronseory noss sna that .ia to sssro Is say ,o.S
Masr ~ fse eonasys e,ae W eua,tio howSvot Mnrr
elainle III lts blthn, tarwe!! sl,ona TeSonses tho
a4a h1n e lasn q In, tne rsswsM S,0ns 'o'
i.ELD THE Dn-i, II Trust. -...
md that the tompa.nsut, Matter, Asd always aup-
st Essd % %ns4xe o {1 a ns ae s 1s ' s
nna, Moa ns"''' ind held it in trnnt. si1 soars
b sses 9 II: lid anaS9 ano 70 Ry
inr#e yautoa 81, ,ouo moro th. IL wa" ha due After
us, aaher 5lfor,ot The t;ourt, ho sad not 20 near
~ ". T - as &c e s
ing 70 , Try n r., ~ - v, ,s 1e aeot lie '~'o n''
'ss"'' Con cosvErsu ETA i ronrl us or THE LAND
conveyed to him by ala>.9, alssi to 6u scres, to
s,' Eon, and nd tSs rr,.asls aoorge Z Futon aid
TrusseA Conveyed TO ". ". Pc rksn. Earwe also sn,l.
ts;s sefss %s y Tastssx s, sies:s came, IT, Tssve
was thought, wond wish tho c1se rostrnncd. I'm
tolcttos. however, aiy1Ecd t't Y stouit DO tiled
THE FOLLOWING MOTIF: .....
"Clnou1r Counr, cooE COUNTY.
@i9s % tsie noss hat sa Ya.t ups :s a saT;
lug Of tho aboye entitled cause OH tue daS LOT WHICH IL
N4B set, to wit, OIL the l9.h 1nst.
wv ''' "dxo. ". SMITH, Solicitor for Farvel',
II. caulAel announced to TIM Cart, oes 90. 1917.
that AZ ho could not present % tlG tnut husn sahe
rs would probably obtain fur hiB ccnt continuance
l,e would PROCEED. 1Io called upon slr. farwell rs
witness to support Mahcr'a allesHtaon'-
FAnWELf. CHAINED
tb,. he trchasol the land for about 81 500. The deed
h, sAii was given 10 him ns TIM competition
Cf tic rurchaac 1Ie rafd Naer Tor the lnnts Ill M
fafalcrp, own notra. nuh II check Of Maaer'n tht
check was for s5u and was given for vet on ancohf
ELECTION which Earwen VOL from Mnlcr Ihe no:cs
ve;c notes made to different pa1ttea hJ Miner, whacE
F1rwcll agreed to taka up in consla'fa'toa OF 'he
Wien Mr. Farwells testimony mas in, alalera 60
ficitor applied 10 tha Co art Tor
LEAVE: TO A1iEaD TIE BILL.
Ia cunforn, It to tho set&8IGusR OF Mr. Far~el. lhe
notion wan not acsidcd then, md M. Mahsr wad
calsl by Mr. Ca1,lleld. a1a1les. N hts testimony,
ckatuled that the considerations of tue deeu Nah ~
uiIeacd IN Its h for xnb!ing debit In Ut course
at a1a1era examination TUG ioowng @ a., wy
YOU Lost money w1sh AIR: firwslI "nd put
in YOUR note III IN evidence Of intehtednes7
ccutracted 1t tho card-tAho?" Hero came
tic tug ot war;. Con- Smith, alr tasweils attorney
called sir. Tarw., aud lnvo shown " him M tlas n lt
hA M nntp Of Mr: Mahcr, as alleged n nc ~
Now submit TINT they cannot 40 on anti contra.lc
tiu testimony" The objection Has nFerli1lea anu All
Is .heS allowed 10 coe.radIct FAewcti, WHO hAu becn
previously called na 4 wituros in Ms fnTor.
After Malc-'s evidence cpntrafricting Farweta N.s
Ia tho question Of a1nea!ss the shl ~ inake CORE
st,ond wtih Farwells evidence w.'a aalh faaaen IN
ttcirt took the objections Under alstecncnt. Ihe &c
ciaon wns 1avrssed, day hefore scRtefaAy, III favor
Air. farwtl. -. y, n,n,,t.,, !,
from uorve1 sation with competent attorneys, th9
iiaber could obtain 10 relief even Rnder tho sate
tscts alleged by bis opponent.