The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-10-13


reason that he can mink OF now why he would not
support him; but tnat can be told better few
SrANARD, EDWIN o., St. Louis, No. republican,
II Grant Is renominated he could only conceive 1t
would De 10 behalf Of the party and not the man,
STANDEFoRD ELISHA D., Kentucky, democrat,
is IN favor Of people determining now long man
Grant beyond his present term OF service.
| sTARKwEArHER, HENRY H., Norwich. Conn.,, re-
| publican, u not prepared 10 express an opinion
| until he has had time TO carefully consider the
subject. and would not say whether he was or was
not against a third term or would support Grant
! II ren0minated.
STEPHENS, ALEXANDER H.. Georgia, democrat,
ever renoInlnate Grant for q third term, and he
ooes not recognize my ssmsrseISy likely 70 me-
great argument against It in the plea OF rotation
In ONCE, which ne regarded with some degree OF
contempt. So lar as his support Of Grant is con
his action the platform, not the man. Give him a
good platform. sucn AZ the country needs, and he
mated; his doctrine was 'Prtnctpta seq non
hOnsifst.n
crat is, with the democracy, opposed to third
STRAIT, HORACE b., Minnesota. republican. Dare
not anticipate what the future might impose
upon the party. II Grant was renomlnated would
undoubtedly support him II it were party
SgRAwBRIDGE JAMES D., Pennsylvania. republi-
can, Is not opposed TO q third term ana mas more
confidence in the American people than IN pollti-
cans. ii, therefore. the repu6ncans should deem
It wise to renominate Grant third fourth or fifth
time ne wonld support hun:
does not believe in more tnan two terms Tor q DEM
ocratic President, and would not support Grant
SroRM. JOHN b., Pennsylvania, democrat, is the
enemy OF two terms Tor any man Tor President.
would not vote against Grant II renomlnated.
SWAMI, THOMAS, Maryland, democrat 10 OPP
Grant out Of the Presidency but never r into II
SYPHER, J. H., Louisiana, republican. Opposed
to third term unreservedly, does not believe the
party would commit suicide, and would not sup
port Grant II renominated.
TAYLOR. ALEXANDER W., Pennsylvania, republi-
can. II Grant is nominated, not knowing what
extraordinary event might conspire to make HIM
again q candidate, he could not say now what ne
THOMAS, CHARLES r., North Carolina. republican,
can say aneanIvocally That he wlll support Grant
THoRNBuRGH JACOB w.. Knoxville, Tenn. repub-
llcan. II Grant IS renominated Tor third term
he would support him as against democrat,
but does not believe III third term to any other
extent.
TODD LEMrsL, Pennsylvania republican, is posi-
lively down on q third term and has no sympathy
with any OF its advocates. II Grant Is renomi-
mated he would not be supported BY his State or
TOWNSEND WASHINGTON, Pennsylvania, republi-
can. thinks 1t would be bad prece dent TO even
propose Grant or third term, and while he sup:
ported him the first and second terms, ne could
not consistently do 80 again.
TREMAlN, LYMAN, New York, republican, con-
take care Of itse ana no opinion Of Ills Would
TYNER, JAMES N, Indiana republican, is op-
posed to third term, but has no lear wnlle Grant
remains IN Of1ce, so that II he should be renom-
mated he would support him.
belongs to the good old democracy which always
advocated q single term, and he would not favor
WADDELL, ALPRED NJ, North Carolina, democrat
having been an 0fncer in the forces OF the late
Confederate states OF America. MS sentiment
against third term may be regarded as OF no Inn
pOrtAnCe M .ettNf4tA 4aaN - ~ eN
WALDRoN. HRNRY, Hillsdale, Mich. republican,
has never given the subject moments serious
Thought. Didn't see any objections to voting Tor
the regular candidate CIV, whoever ne may De;
publican, is In favor OF third term, and ii the
party wants Grant four or five terms he viii sup
WALLS, JOSIAH T., Florida, republican, is pre-.
JUDGED against third term for anybody. 1t was
very uncertain what ne would do IN the event OF
WARD, MARCUS l., Newark, N. J., republican,
could not say what emergency might arise when
would justify the denomination OF Grant y ne were
the right 10 support him until ne knew tue circum.
stances requiring Departure rom 0id precedents
have to consider before express an opinion
SO uncertain are the ways OF itlcs. llie
WELLS, ERAsrUs, Missouri, democrat. The de-
mocracy OF Missouri Is unit against third term.
WHEELER. WILLIAM A.. New York, republican.
support any man three times.
WHITE, ALEXANDER, Alabama, republican, could
notexpress an opinion on the subject until brought
WHlTEHEAD, THOMAS Virginia, democrat II
the New England states attempt to press candi-
date on their own peculiar notions he would ra-
ther have Grant IOrty-i0ur times tnsn YANKEE
miser. IT. y&g
lcan. The liberal republicans made the issue
against Grant for o second term, and he would not
be likely to support HIM II nominated third
time.
WHITLEY, RICHARD H.. Georgia, republican.
There might arise contingency wnen II would be
right to reelect Grant, and II such an event should
guide the party to again put him In nomination he
would support him Without any reservation on his
wHrrTHoRNB. WASHINGTON o.. Tennessee,
democrat is an ardent advocate OF one term for
democrat, and no more Tor republican.
SO certain that while the country is well governed
that frequent changes are beneficial
WILLARD, CHARLES W., Montpelier, Vt, repub1-
can, is not in favor OF q third term Tor Grant,
and would not support him II nominated.
M Se Ga 70 Ssn
PRESIDENTIAL campaign.
WILLIAMS, CHARLES G., Wisconsin, republican,
could not say at this time what he will DO years
hence. Remembers that circumstances alter
WILLIAMS, j. M. s., Massachusetts,, republican,
has no opinion to express. Is very busy attending
to the business of his constituents.
WILLIAMS, WILLIAM. indiana, republican, has
strong convictions against third term, but not
to the extent that he would not support Grant II
renomlnated.
has no hesitation IN declaring himself against q
third term under any circumstances, the prlnc-
pal OF rotation IN Once oeng a. STAKE presis
nor his constituents would support any man for a
third term.
WILLIE, ASA H., Texas, democrat, Is opposed to
a third term under all circumstances.
WILSON, +. X, Maryland, democrat. Against
third term, Grant and the republican party.
Hopes Thurman, Of Ohio, will be the democratic
leader in 1875, and will help elect him.
WILSON, JAMES, Iowa, republican Has no opin-
ion about third term, bis whole ambition being
TO see the rights OF the farmers OF the West Sc
cured, and II 1t can be done through the repuD-
ican party well aud good; otherwise the farmers
will fashion candidates to suit themselves.
WILSON, J.. NJ, Indiana. republican. Uncondi-
tionally one term; against denomination under
any circumstances, and could not support Grant If
renomlnated.
WILTSHIRE, Judge, Arkansas, emphatically op-
posed to q third term, to Grants denomination,
and would unreservedly oppose him.
WOLFE, SIMEON r., Indiana, democrat one
term man.
WOOD, FERNANDO, New YORK. democrat is
against any innovation as to the number OF terms
President should serve. Two Is more than enough