The Cambria freeman. [volume] (Ebensburg, Pa.) 1867-1938, 1874-09-18

DoiNGs IN CoURT.-Up to the time of
gong TO press, Thursday afternoon. this fol
rowing civil suits have been disposed of
AT 10 O'Clock Saturday morning. the civil
Uiuso ot heifrlch VS.. Hipps and Lloyd. which,
was on trial, was withdrawn and. he ,is, hi
eAnausted, Court proceeded to pass sentence
Sentence had thcretofore been passed on flrns
n,iu uiSplers,conVicted of arson, and the only re-
tense were McGraw, Pauius, and White. tho
Gailitzin burglars. The two first named Uere
the to he Knss dGr thgef or
w lLo ooIateu oy due course OF, law.
"hereupon Court adjourned
SECOND WEEK
The county of Cambria VS. Francis b,Er,a,
f. gneo issue. This was one of the ca ses where
~ the AuGitorS or Cambria county. AT their
Iast settlement, refused to accept certain or.
aiiseg,mg us their reason that the County
Inelr services, and that they were, therefore
Tbe be Gnr to .ny pay other than such salary
were not entitled to any pay for their services
the Of 18th MareS @ bnt ss thsir s salary
cR,itied en- TO travelling expenses when called ou.
OF their office 10 attend to their duties as such
Ofhcefs rms reduced the amount rejected nv
the County Auditors to s31, for which amount
innsment against the defendant was given
of the Court. ~ &C
The County of Cambria VS.. John A. Kennedy.
rcigFeG issue. The amount claimed t,y the
plaintiff was S2I. This case was submit,eS ne h q
question for the decisi6n OF the Court whether
Tue services thus performed DIRE such clerical
services tMr. Kennedy being clerk to the com
inissioners) as are compensated for by the an
ruai salary OF s6OO, prescribed by the act above
referred TO.
The County OF Cambria vs. ANTHONY Anna
fcigned ISSUE In this case it was iarepfl by
the counsel that the Court, after hearing the
testimony OF the defendants, shall enter juig-
ment Tor such balance as in their opinion frou,
SUCH testimony IS due the plaiutiff-the cause
being the same as that of the COiifty VS. O'FrieI
-whereupon the Court entered Judgment in
favor of the plaintiff for $3.50.
Cambria County VS.. William d. McC,elland.
Feigned issue. Same above, and judgment
for Sl09.15.
The County of Cambria VS.. John Bloch.
Feigncd issue. Mr. Bloch is Poor Dffccter u Il
the circumstances the sarle as those of the
County commissioners Some dispute arose
in the trial of this cause S to the jurisdtt ion
OF the County Auditors, and whether they had
any right to audit the accounts of the Poor Di-
rectors. IT was however agreed that the cases
should be heard. and that the legal points thus
reserved should be DISGUISED and decided upon
AT next Argument Court Judgment for plain
tiff for s2U5.S5.
The County of Cambria Peter II. Berg
Feigned issue. Same as above, and tu,Iyment
for the plaintiff for slsss3
Cambria County vs.. james Farren Feigned
issue. Same as above aud judy meut for sf6 .55.
The County of Cambria IS. ysadote Lilly,
Steward of the Poor House. feig ned issue.
Judgment for defendant.
Emily c. Little and Harriet A. Little VS.. f.
q. Kerr and John G. Truit, for use or David 81
Myers. Feigncd issue. e. G.. Kerr abandons
his claims The cause Continued at the costs
OF the plaintiffs.
Daniel Stroup VS.. Joshua F. Carpenter SutH-
mons in trespass on he case. Settled. aud de-
fendeut confcsses judgment for costs.
William Andei son, ID. r. Brum, John l.;
Chalnbers and John Falon Vs. Henry IIarnhart
and l. B.Cohick. Summons in assumpsit. j udy-
ment for the plaintin for 1926.
Cambria Iron Company Christy-ejcct-
ment On trial Thursday.