Sunbury American. [volume] (Sunbury, Pa.) 1848-1879, 1874-02-20
LIST OF CAUSES

For trial NJ Adjourned Court, commencing Mon
day, March ID, 1874.
Samuel Mcdonald ys Penna. Railroad compa-
nv. lessees of p. & f. Railroad Company.
+ W. p wilmington use VS. Michael Flaharty.
John B. Peacock & Brother VS. William Starr.
j. b. Schooey VI Henry Haupt.
John II. Conrad VS. George Miller.
John Il. Conrad VS. George Miller.
George Wills vs. Jas. IL. Mccormick.
James VI. Petit vs. The Philadelphia " Reading
Railroad Company.
James ID. GehIig VS. Leonard l.. Bidelman.
Weand. link IS Co.. VS. }. j. Rauch.
James II. Homes VS. Vim. II. Marshall.
Elisha Elliott VS. Henry b. Weaver.
Peter Hayes VS. The Philadelphia X Erie Rail
road Co.
Daniel Fl. Maurer VS. Henry r. Bowman.
John NJ. Fry for the use of d. W. Smith vs.
J. G. Morgan and George Trcon.
Daniel Druckemler vs Andrew J. Stroh.
State Bank VS. Abraham Kissinger.
Ephraim r. Miller, who sues as well for him.
self as for the School Directors of Shamokn twp
VS. Hugh II. Teats.
Ross. Shott * Co., VS. J. f. Smith & Co.
J. W. Davis VS. J. P. Beard and Jas. Beard,
adm'rs.
Charles Glass VS. Peter Baldy, owner, and
Charles Romig, contractor.
A. W. Crcamer VS. Joseph Nankirk.
Charles Koch vs. j. II. Mccormick.
Commonwealth of Penn'a. suggesting Geo. W :.
Smith vs. Philip NJ. sEndel. Jacob o. Beck and
Valentine Detz.
Same VS. Same.
Andrews q Ford vs. Amandus Kotz.
John Fry VS. Danville, HaZetOn ~ Wilkesbarre
Railroad Company.
Joseph Bacher VS. Matthias Smuck, ct al.
Jacob Fagely VS. David Kimbel.
G. s. Lewis vs. Swalan K Bowman.
For Court commencing Monday, March 10th, "a.
Milley T. Day. Indorsee of Elias Day VS. AL
cues Day.
Henry l.. Cake by his attorney Jos. W. Cake
VS. Philadelphia Il Erie Railroad Company.
Joseph ". Cake VS. Philadelphia " Erie Rail-
rad Company.
]. Adam Cake, VS. The Philadelphia & Erie
! Railroad Company.
/ Abah Dimick vs. Michael Dimick.
Ephraim B. Heany vs. Jefferson NJ. John "
] Kcrscy John.
| Lewis Marquoidt * Johaua MarquOidt, his
wife. for the use of the said Johann Marquoidt
/ VS. George Fagely.
! Abraham Lerch VS. Mrs. Lydia Thompson, wi
dow of JEFF. Thompson owner, orreputed owner,
/ and Jacob Reinert, contractor.
Philip Dater vs. The Northumberland Coal Co.
/ Geo. A. Fellows VS. The Northumberland Coal
Company.
d. W. Smith use vs. Aaron Barral.
P Armbruster II Bro, vs w. r. F. Weimer.
/ !. ". Gillispie VS. John ii. FOresman.
Samuel Guick VS. Lemuel Campbell.
/ :. ii. Johnston, use VS. Peter W GraS.
Samuel John VS. Fred J. Anspach ct. al.
J. H. Johnston. use vs. Peter W. Gray.
John G. GuTtner Us Samuel Bloom, j. II. En-
gel.
/ Mocanangua Coal Co. vs. Thos. Barr.
Joseph Diehl vs. Charles Knt.
Jacob b. Masser, Wm. A. Sober vs Joseph W
Cake.
Same VS. Same.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for th'
use of Geo. 2. Kamp VS. Jno. j. Reimensnyder
ct. al.
E.R. Miller who sues for himself, rs well a
for the School Directors of Shamokin township
VS. Furman Farnsworth.
Charles Kemmerer VS. Benjamin Snyder.
Chales Cllligah VS. The Danyille, II. " W.
X. X. Co.
Aaron Barrel vs. The Lycoming Fire Insurance
Company.
Susan Walt, admir-. &c, Of Catharinc Walt
Jacob Peifer.
Coleman X. Sober VS. Jno. +. Rathbunn d Co
J. *. J. Gladng VS. Elijah Hammer and Cath
arine Hammer. owner or reputed owner and te
nant in possession of possession of lots Nos.2, &c