The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1874-01-22

October Term.

JACKSON, Mss, Jan. Z, 1874.
No. 1854. A. J. Gregory VS.. \. f. Smith
Admir-; Continued.
1882 Amanda Clifton, ct al, VS.. Arabella G..
Owen; Submitted.
100. James w. Tate. ct al, vs.. Universal
Life Insurance Company of America !;
Submitted.
III. Conrad Yost vs.. w. J. Robbins ct al. !;
Certiorari awarded.
lib. o. David vs.. Samuel z. Walker adj
ministrabor; Continued by consent.
I'LL j B. Coffield, Executor VS.. John NJ
Powell; Continued by consent.
ZIG. X. NJ. Showers vs.. Margaret FrylOgle,
ct al; Submitted.
lily. 7. NJ. Gin vs.. Davis Green Submitted
1920. ii. B. Barker, ct al, VS.. John B. Dom
aldsor Continued
1922. e. G. Bellvs. james Gordon Citation
awarded and continued.
l125. w. b. Brack vs.. Fooneer & Sykes;
Submitted
1I26. Mobile Il Ohio Railroad Company vs.
Samuel Weiner; Submitted.
1l27. 5. T. Martin y. \. f. Minor, ct al;
Submitted.
112S. L. A. Swotford, ct al, vs. NJ f. Car
mon, ct al; Submitted.
1929. James F. Cummings, ct al, vs.. Albert
a. O2lesby Submitted.
1905. Estill Beler, ct al. VS.. w. y. Roy
Continuance set aside.
669. II. III. Camp vs.. j. T. Westbrook and
ME- Westbrook; Judgment corrected
as to costs.
1870. w. G. Nelson vs.. S. Alexander. ct al,
Ex'rs; Doeketed.
1871. John /. Mosely, Guardian, etc, VS..
John M. Fowler; Docketed.
JANUARY 10, 1874.
1135. Eli Station VS.. Arabella f. New Dock
eted.
1874. Susan Stack vs.. w. II. H. Tyson. ct
al; DOcketed on agreement of coun-
1910. Early Hendricks VS.. Board of Super
visors of Lowndes county; Ordered
that this case be renewed in the name
of Nj. f Hendricks, EARLY Hendricks,
plaintiff being dead.
1880. Richard Farr, ct al, VS.. G. G. Dibrell
Continued
g97.r A. Benn, Ell. al, vs.; G. Dfbreff; Mo-
ton 10 dismiss cause overruled.
997. Memphis and Charleston Railroad
Company vs.. j. j. Thomas; Filed and
docketed.
$50. Hugh L. McVay, ct al, vs. the State
of Mississippi; Continued.
1892. w. f. Stricklin vs.. NJ. E. Suggs, ct al.
zoe Continued, @ 60,
G Gresary vs. GTssa e W Vad GafGo
DOcketed and dismissed.
lll5. j. l.. McCarty vs.. Simon Wolf ct al,
firm of Wolf & Co.; Stricken from
1877. William Reed, Admir- of Jesse Reed,
decd, VS.. Allen A. Estes ct al;
Affirmed.
466. +. G. CLEARWATER and E. f. Haynie
corrected as to costs.
795. Thomas 3. Smith VS. William II. Clop-
ton, EXt'r, etc, of James II. Hough-
ton, decd; Judgment corrected as to
costs.
1I3S L. j. Lipsey VS.. S. McClamroch Sus-
tanned for want of prosecution.
996. John Burleyson vs.. James F. Sample,
Admir- Motion for certiorari over
ruled and affirmed
1879. James NJ. TAFT VS.. John C.. Avera
of ed and Al
S64. William Reed vs.. w. G.. Burlington ct
al; Continuance set aside and sub
mitted.
-. James Nj. TAFT VS.. N. NJ. Whitley
Motion to docket and dismiss sub
mitted.
l140. b. Caldwell vs. The Southern Express
Company; Docketed and dismissed
for want of prosecution.
ll41. The State of Mississippi ex rel. H. Il.
Pease, et al, VS.. The Mayor and AL
dermen and Treasurer oil the City of
West Point; Docketed and certorari
awarded.
tor; Leave granted defendant in error
to file brief
500. II. Fl. Hutchns VS.. w. T. Vickers;
Leave granted defendant in error to
file brief.
$685. X. II. Shotwell, ct al, VS.. w. f. White
head.
1926 Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company
VS.. Samuel Weiner; demanded to the
docket
1929. James F. Cummings ct al j, vs.. Albert
"A. Ogleby; Leave to Mr.. George to
file brief.
/ JACKSON, Jan u, 1874.
99l. J. V. Doniphan vs.. The State of Mis-
sissippi; Reversed and proceedings
dismissed.
| 757. Georgia Home Insurance Company
VS.. William Fl. Jones; Petition for re-
argument refused.
| 7S7. J. p. Stewart VS.. Phillip Davis, ct al;
Affirmed.
900, I.etitia A. Lassly and Margaret E.
Lassly, (per porchien anil vs.. Lidia
j. Phipps; Reversed and demurrer
overruled.
ls9. Mary j. Wilson vs.. Rebecca Cox. ct al /;
Reversed and demurrer overruled.
/ 1876. Mary J. Wilson VS.. Rebecca Cox, ct al !;
Reversed aud demurrer Overruled.
/ --. james nj. TAFT VS.. N. NJ. Whitley :;
Motion to docket aud dismiss over
ruled
Sl1. W. II. Ross VS.. b. P. Oliver, ct al. !;
/ Affirmed.
Gas. George Malin Davis VS.. Margaret Har-
1892. Daniel T. Yases rs Luke D. Yates and
Julia A. Yates vs.. James Richards,
Administrator OF William Ii. Rich
Il ards, deS'd q, aud as Guardian I'D litem
OF Sarah, Louisa. lberr. jerome and
Amanda Richards; Remantled. re-
yefSed and remanded.
S24. w. III. glopton. eX'r, VS.. Julia H Hall J.
Il ordered that DfleI Oy IL. Davis be filed
herein.
1I42. RIP. Sawyer aud w. P. Ford VS. J. B.
Tonsdale. ee al. Filed and doeketed.
1l4S. X. b Wishish VS.. Board OF Supervisors
of Tishaming0 county; Filed and
docketed.
1l24. Sarah l.. Mcclellan VS.. James ID. Ia
tum, ct al. !; Submitted.
11l9. Loughridge and Began vs.. John Bou-
land; Continued.
-. 4. NJ. Howell VS.. Mississippi Central
s, Railroad Company Submitted.
JANUARY 10, 1874.
s 590 Memphis and Charleston Railroad
Company VS.. Narcissa Scragxs: Sub
mitted-
ri JANUARY IL, 1874.
j 1872. Luke Les, District Attorney: who sues
tor the State of Mississippi, and John
J II. Chiffon, relator, VS.. James Will
lianas Matlon to dismiss argued and
submitted
0f6. II. b. Meaehf a, ct al, VS.. A. G. Ed
u mondson. q i Submitted.