, 1874-09-11
WEST SIDE BRIGGS house,


Yesterday JUtlgo Tarwotl entered tho tlnal do
crne in tho wol!-known controversy about tic
right 10 uso "Drges Houso" to designate CHI
raso huiel. IT IL ~ foliowH
=, Thfs day ca'nn tho rnid cc,npatnan!a by Monroe,
G;b:e% uhls. t4tr aocttcr, ,.tl thu sill doonti.
mnrrs' Of If !io ea! .oloalans 10 te hii Of con,-
Fl3tt, nd Uf tile said conlninnna TO tho cro3s-I]l
l' tia vassg and tho argument Of counsel thereon IA
oI the opinion that. undor all The circumstances Of a
III: nan,s ana trademark Of briggs liouso 10 tesig-
1sts and dissi'gph hoIr hotel as tho corner Of TA
tySas and nnnp ,i1 sttrse str II tie oy ct csseo II
Tho right, III Against tho raid "conpainants to uBo
Aal Trademark to tosIgnase mud distinguish. tAor
lid city. Wherefore the Court doth ovasrulo tic
t demurrer to Tho raiI hill Ut complaint and toth
frta;t tho sail demurrer to sail cross-bl III this
At"i he!ennen the parties sfores, having eousrrea
,ib issf 10y eo rnreso Of av.iding further ga
ltt, l"s thu Court to make mud enter herein for o
'ns'n ai final diaposon of the Sumo such an
t ana derrte a3 untlcr all tho cireumHtnnceA dig
f"*''d +" tho comrt slluil just and equitable
L~..vsn tt!e Hnrties.
~. .n!Ey understood by The Court here It is ordered,
jta;:>ll, ha,h drereeI by tho Court tAat the sail
u:oEer ox 10 SOLICIT aid e put IN M uso ue "
n 'na tiicir a.ia hocl aome other namo mud des-
os,Oor te sa!d i0'0 aefaaania s aa'a ana 'at day
annf S c Or ,. T. fs oy nrong uno
t:adenark Or my eoorabo intuition thereof as a
Nm for saiI hotel, 10 attract c,oso,nors
E:reo aud aall ceasc tho Of said nume or trade
alark or any colorado imitation Of thn sans i ali a
vrrtiseentF, Oh n hilcasls regiatcrs Li!A.of-fara
ny! lilo like, ali Shall usu, or cause to 10 uyc uno,
.aa ho's an A.; ;ron 1T tho reataers biltsoffare letter
o".de anu tAo like, ths now nato to 10 keectcd nul
Em1 IN so "a ai9rsrad; provided, thHt to said do
my II a',y ns'nos w.lc shAli not issl,,!o tic ,,ss
rT " p .eSsbl1 Imitation ef t4e said name trademark
t'tyio'A conlection with tho prorrletorgllip or !
-. which destroyed In tis 9roat IRE of |
il hntl provided nso, that this order shall moi
!t!'lro tne e!td defendants To remove tho worls
t:F!'i mn, ri raid lelendaa said loel on which they
n"sy h"iIen In ,1,eAr. N'
Aai a.. nrtits aforesaid, BY their collectors afore
w., L. 'le tlle ,!e:e',ant sy lawfully uao tLe words
M".t SIDE GriHss House." M and for q na,uo md
e. "i:crod tic question aforesaid III Of u,,no. thsHt
t';ll :lne would u culorablo tmtatio,. nr ia
a:s ef e GnT'aants said hotel. and therefore
ths assrss And they lerety enoil,cd from liz
m" II the hamn froln and aftor Oet. j. 1s7is
I'll I'll tho "si 5 tsnnts II Il s'Ss,s ys t hsr as ss
!ta pstd 'a,nc rnd trailc,nnrk Of G1,r;n%a snJa
! loe" M geoa fah with bclisf that they ad fko fie
e" ~ n,a M M ana d, With VIII reasonable color Of ground
t';tta ". arEilea III amcahte Why for lin aneodr
- sn't;;h !, htri,t discrimination Of tlo question H.
ts the Court, tint each party to i!iis slit 10 nav It'll.
/ - es'.1a I'll un ha'ne, to be taxcd. .se, N'@
IN Fiey Of tho favorable forms Of tin aecroo
{ VI o.! tho practical bonoHts wLcl, will, rea1It
~ " a.e selection ; Of now md dittipcttve name
l.'!2 "ttl l'aro dotcrminod not to appeal sron,
Judge Farwell's dccrco bit to accept an, aI,;a
! llH ifoTHious md to that ond hayc, .clonin'i
'"f lhelr 1o"uo tho nanlo of sltinuor'a Hotel.