, 1874-05-16

~~l--.---SE@@f:
1nis ~ lmfteti6 l1t Do not moan thak hf eeys
Nam ~, fui spefRinK K ipa!y ~ nlS enpY!oa51 a5
dcrt WA snsT1 at1h.a W ts9sooas9I mSe
nnn tn H. s.,t,ie n9s Ill., o"uu
ha treitv ~ u!,r s,ncr,ntend XII ,vop Il nnnai
liz in ri. .rs,. pI..ata,s % ~ ,. VIII Aus NV
tr,1o tiinnnry and thn nnra 1osrt e,nI %nnsss
ara mi In s,,nnosa tfst liz noj,a ,atarn,or ""
minister to. III. nntnit. JfIonco ali hotoroiox
olorgymon must ,n aot aai,lo from M thn "aqo ~
sy ass mst pstssi sds o{ysnqs {ss Il IN hS Rn
ca,no to hia 6ifloo, or M Wllborforoa to hia % N
tho prosecutor % has = - "'es'1oA'' ~ n''' i''
LIMITED .aop'g arEo1A1, rnoy1pnron
whon o roye lone M s o1esgy nrayo
hc that rojoots infant baptiam il nat orsi,na5r
you 200 how ho Is limiting Tho caro- Of Cad Nbi
thus wo must cast away from Gods spopial lave
Il tl tlcas who: hof3 not oar standards
% having novor boon called to this holy
lEIarws and ai y women aach ss Mtss Smiley
thus narrowing down tho providence Of God
until wo find, ID looking arollpd, only here aud
there q few olorgymon loft in Zione groat
Church: ON Whom look men az Sumner,
and % aa icy nto M bsna ony 2 e
ordinary providence, or elao through Gods nog-
1oot, because t1oso EldGra DO not know whothor
1lleolh waa caliod nt oil ,.-ho canae perhaps, BY
siosIa.,, doaa neglect; md rlen look upon somo
olereyfnon, and am told that thoHe elergymen
eamo a py special miraculous method lot pray
uod that Ao may return to tho ordinary .proYt-
oenca horeaftor. tApplalso and laughtor.] -.
rHNHLoPE-RATToN.' :
4. 4tIa G,t ~ 80 aoA4Aat ~ 40 w tAnhut "Hu o!o
y pan9 ans: 1no prosecutor calls your attonton to
md IN ti nv "oYe nor wao1
for tecaIlinn Ella far Il haa haon aoversi nanra
since road tho Odyssey. Ho is tllor oreatdat
Penelopo of. all In this .mattor;: fot:.wheraaa
9a,, On ono I oay, Ae Proyea to yon ~ 4 :, whole
Kali o ysserav a'orna tns 1e no a no. Poeve IN
lgion without hope-h religion Of rooli workp
ho said. Whero can .you find. hope In that
When you come to condemn me. l do not want
s;thnnt W o3nnd INC ,o3tn no5 noang notn relgien
ono or the ot,ar. fT'nnrhtar1 ~:1Doas "op'' @"A'
y '~s' sAnEL11Us,
And again he proved by a long. aro,nent that
tho saboillan, lis man Who fnlly idonti0 Ieas
''l.t CHRIST with God. Tho truth IL tbe sabel.
tho dioty Of Jesus Christ for. in the
theoloRy OF sabollIun:: Jeels i1brjst /. notb,1r
clso than, q great Father, having for the ma.
'ment become, the mediator or Tor the moment.
having bocono tho Holy 'sptrit. Thus tho
theory Of ';sabollida' il the theory above
all others that makes Jasua Ohrist
tho very God. Having toiIod ali tLat dnv to
show TINT I was. d, BabelKan. hs tnf1ad a1I tho
next dny TO- phow that Il wss.. a 'Unitarihn;
othera sebarstes Jesus Ghritt from lad y And ~
now wart Won wien von icoma ID fnnka m
yo,1r verdict not to mnka mo f,nth ~ tbosn cta!
aotors, an willing to be eithor. hut + oomld
not bear to bo botl, ;, :. ~.
! 49,. -s--
~; - n1p ',5nvEe -: 20" !,
.4.,,, ~ ~ Wy! SS.
A eae oono'oe'on et ffoi. ,ewlngs argument
mr. Noyea took tho hoortn behalf OF tho do
fondant, and said 1t would ho remembered BY
tho prenbyterv that when he cono,uf7ef, hta' ~
gu@ons on .ne pteesaag aey e. haa epoken
somo"nas orleny on tho thifa apeeihcatton IN the
indictment. He would first call the attention of
the proebytory to .'>:: -: -:
:. "s THE FIFTH II m observation-disclosures
,,,to,, .s,,,.. 49,. 80 G..:-m II. !.
the doetrines known as Evangelical. After road.
ing tho speo ifoation no 6aid that tho acoysat,on
against tho defendant was d very ser1ouB ;uue
aud: that ptif ho7 supposed tho defendant
was :. guilty I;ho eer!ainly :; would - bot
stand up. before j. The Preabytetv t. to
plead his cause, II tic prosbyterv vars 10 ,ine
derstand by the specification TINT the accused
fails to preach evangelical tlootrinos by way of
making eet of formal diacourses ,1pop each or
them, It would. .,bo rondily ,concoled tlati Eho
Charge was true 50 far aa. the documentary owl
tlenco before the C6lrtwas concerned: But Il the
interwovan all thoae subjects into his eermonH:
and tnught the truth concerning them, thou the
charge was utterly denied, and by the testimoaY
from tho lps OF living WITNESSES In the court It
had bsen proved',t to. DO baselcsa., TIC proof
Of it's baselesat character WAS to be found
in the very. aormona BY which ,tio prose- e
outor :'had' attempted to, prove. TINT Prof.
Swing had not u, proachod Prosbvtorinn
doctrines. The prosecutor, in all his argument.
seemed to have!gone upon the csupposition that