, 1874-12-13

Is
Lot q, Block 8; Lot IS, Block 5, in Morgnn's
Block 4, in Mary Smiths Resubdir1sion Of Gill
iams' aoa the east Il OF Lot 40, in Pol]ocks Ad-
dision, all in the s. il OF the s. E. Il Of Sec. Il.
80, 13. the owners Of which are unkuown.
Also largo numbe Of lots in Will County, in
Campbell j. Boweu's Addition to Joliet.
THE a1BB FOSTER SUIT.
The defendants, F. E. Taylor and George
TAYLOR. in the suit OF j. II. Shriove against thom
and "Gibb" Foster, to dispossess them Of =
room ut No. 134 Clark street, think that Mr.
bill. They claim that they gays Mr. shrioye's
agent "oeE's notice that they we.o intending
to suolet tho room; that they stated that he
could get better rent from other parties and
thas that tney M .1ls: had found more suitable
they charge, that they never had the
/ ease Of the premises in their hands;
that it was signed without their knowing
the contents except that they we're to pay 500 =
month; that they assigned The lease III good
faith, supposing Foster wished the room Tor a
tailor-shop; and that only when he completed
the transfer did ho tell them he wished it Tor an
Office. not even then admitting that it was for
gambling room. They therefore deny all ale-
that they were dishonorable persons
o'LEARy AS A LAWYER
THE TRIBUNE yesterday contained an account
OF D. J. OLeary attempting to collect 4 ls-lo
bill. aud his difficulties owing to the want of bs-
lief Of the public in his veracity- The point was
still further proved by the verdict which was
rendered yesterday morning, and which WIS for
the defendant, thus showing that 1.-The twelve
good men and tue" also failed to believe Mr..
OLeary under OATH Air. OLeary threatened to
make SOHO disturbance, and charged improper
conduct on ballin who had accidentally
mlslaid the verdict, but which he
fonnd 8 few minutes after the opening Of court
This failed to make any impression, aud the
Iriah advocate conteuted himself with making
tho stereotTped motion for Z now trial, alu de-
parted
UNITED STATES coURrs.
A. q. Andrews d. Co. and L. J. Dodge 4
proceedings in the matter OF Hall d Bartlett,
carriage manufacturers. Complainants claim
that the aales were not made for adeunate
amounts or fairly. and also ask that an inJunc-
ton u.y be issued to prevent the Assignee from
delivering the goods sotd to SpA1ord.
DASKRCPrcT ITEMS
l.. Fl. Turner, a hat manufacturer, filed 3 vol
untary petition in baukruptcy.s His liabilities
amount to 919, oOo, with assets to meet them
The Register was invited to look into the matter
SUPERIOR COURT II EE1EF.
John Stephens, for the use OF e. H. Young,
began suit in debt against u. J. Ainick, Pleas
ant Anlck, andJ- J. c. Gillespie, laying DAM
ages at 81, 80U.
julius White sued Lavi u. Griswold for 81, 600.
William Dayie sued T. L. Mcguire for @1.031,
and john 4. Marrow sued E. q. Parker for =
like amount
Harriet C. Thomas began suit in replev,u
against Francis AsneW. 4. J. Corrigau, lEosuas
Fearey, ]. N. Fearey. md George D. Fsarey 10
recover stock OF boots a1d SHOES, etc., at No.
SIS State street, valued ut Il COO.
George Baxter commenced suit in trespass
against Jacob Schoenteld, Benjamin Sc:loeuleld,
aud David schoenfeld, laylug damages At
1000.
George a. Hathaway sued Ira Holmes for
81, 600, and Joseph Zeniesc1ek, Rudolph Wohrll
for Like amount.
James E. Conkiin and James Campbell began
suit for $4,000 against John Beaty and Jabez
Barker.
George scoville brought suit for 81, 600 against
John 7. ColImau-
CIRCUIT COURT.
a. II. e. Weres commenced u suit in trespasa
against W. L. Newman and john Aeller, laying
damages at s., 600.
john E. Iausay commenced !. suit in trespass
against II. J. C.hll, claiming S10.00o.
William Fitzgerald began d suis IN attachment
against Joseph E. DeWolfe for 1881.
THE CALL
JUDGE BLoDoETT-To end of calendar.
JUDGE GARY-25 to 46. except 81 and 81.
JUDaE IckoB3Rrs-344. 50, 81 to Is, Il, ~, 57
to So.
JGpGK noGEns-Ta1 appeals.
JUDGE BooTu-141 to 1856.
JUDGE FAt:wKLL-i2t to 10.
JUDGMENTS.
UNITED STATEa C1ECCIr IrtouET-JCpoE 8LordETr.
William wilkins, 1t A. Il. II. NedLe-g+r, Trr-
dict. $237-y6-Deouta Long IS. A.EEsa E. Snlith and
r. H. Whitla, S2,ol5- -c:-s-me vs., Chicago Gaa aud
Hater-Works Construction Company, $7C6.35.
SuPEE1oR CouRT-JupGE GAAY-W. Z. Cragtn ct
a. john Powell 716,55.-J. Il Davidson ct ST. N.
c. G. c1nte, =, ,2aa07-J Forsyth Co. William
Cathbert 1867 -7o--H. A. Bromley J. 7. Ecammon
ana Eugene Long, FL ,494 23--L. A. Brown ct al vs-
Andrew E4nnevig, s232.-J. $. Waterman w. Patrick
HAT6ns, <o3u.-Enos Ayres Adam aud P. D. Smith.
Sparrow II. Nicasrson and Samuel Smith, ST., Az g.
J. B. Bovea Nerchania' Dispatch Transportation
Company, N-19o.
JUDGE MoRoBER1s-Henrictts Rothgazber W. Ed
win n. Marks and l. J.. NeuLe1ges, verdict, $6l3ed
and motion for new trial