The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1874-11-05
Court of Common Pleas.

David Evans vs. VIM. Evans ct al
Partition. Order of sale made
Walter Day VS.. Elias Bower et al Ju-
ry trial. After plaintiffs evidence was
in, defendants counsel asked for non
suit, which was granted, and jury dis
charged.
State of Ohio. on complaint of George
Drake VS.. James a Speakman. Peace
warrant Defendant ordered to enter
into bond of five hundred dollars to keep
the peace. for. one year. Bond given,
with Calvin N. Harper as surety.
Abraham Dixon VS.. Malinda Crabtree
ct al. Partition. Order of sale made
State of Ohio vs. Minta Searls. AS
sault and batter. Plea guilty, and fine
of ten dollars assessed.
State of Ohio VS.. George W johnson.
Getting intoxicated Plea guilty. Fne
five dollars ~
Rosetta Boggs VS.. Molestus Boggs. Di-
vorce granted on the ground of willful
absence for more thaDthree years.
Joseph Sternberger VS.. Mark Sternber-
ger. Settled at costs of plaintiff.
Jane Daugherty VS., Harrison H. Gilli-
land. Settled at costs of defendant.
Jennie Maloney VS.. Daniel Mitchell
Bastardy. Dismissed at costs of plaintiff
Maria Colley VS.. David Warren. Bas-
'tardy. Dismissed at costs of plaintiff
Henry Woodson vs. John Reihart. Dis
missed at costs of plaintiff.
State of Ohio VS.. Thomas Easterling.
| This was an Indictment for assault and
battery upon one Charles Douglas Eas-
terling is Marshal of the village of Jack
son, and while he admitted the striking,
he claimed that it was done in selfde-
tense, while he was acting in the dis
charge of his official duty. During the
progress of the trial it was discovered
that Thomas Abrams, one of the jurors,
was not a citizen of the United States
The jury returned a verdict of guilty
Motion in arrest of judgment. We had
prepared a very full report of the case,
but as there will be anothefatrial, we re-
serve our report for ting pHasent.
The First National Bank of jackson
VS.. j. B. Creemens and John Harrison.
On the oath day of May, 1873, the plant
if purchased from man calling him.
self Ira Brown, note dated May 81,
i 1873, due three months after date, for
eighty dollars. signed by both defend
ants. When the note became due, plaint-
iff sent word to defendants, when they
came to the bank and saw the note.
They both declared that they had never
signed any such note, but they admitted
that the names looked very much like
their signatures. They said that
Cremeens had contract of agency with
Brown, about the sale of pruning shears
that they had both signed their names
in little blank book On the trial Gre
meens did not seem to know for what
purpose he had signed his name in the
: little blank book, but he seemed to think
J it was so Brown could have his name fol
the purpose of corresponding with him
Harrison testified that he supposed he wa
in some way becoming sucurity for Gre
l meens, that he would account for th
shears he might sell. Mr.. Chapman tes
titled that when he bought the note
). was in little book of blank printed
i notes, and Brown then tore it opt. E4
l. perts were examined, and compared tn
q signatures of defendants on the not
p with their signatures to their answer
/. in the case, and all were of the opipio
:. that the signatul es could not be forgerie
i Verdict for plaintiff for amount of not
IS and interest.
IF Board of Commissioners of Jackso
n County VS.. James Cassell ct al. Orde
, for appraisement of real estate.
al The case of Franklin ]. Rush vs. O
ly ange Furnace Company was on tri
re when we went to press last week. III
as jury returned verdict in favor of d
IN PENDANTS.
,s- In the case reported last week, of Ms
,h garet Clewers VS.. the First National Ban
og where judgment was taken by default,
is. is due to the bank to say that it was f
M money on deposit which was claimed
or creditors of R. E. 6. Olewers, and Il
er, bank was garnisheed, and had to abb
the order of the court, and it was y