The New York herald., 1874-09-02

,s sssss s . M sf % hs has wSoS bse.S
hinseli nom complainant or refused to visit her at
the 0s :s ds:iss sss s:s time s and
psans hersiy defendant visited the said pisintG Al her
aO%c .SsS %s sna B. sa% a s
planun has and did during the year Aforesaid IRE
n sat LAKE asS city and request him . her Win
05 ssr Ss
her said soci'stions or any o. tnsm or AZ any Tms ne
language or opprobroas or offensive language in any
BSefsndsnt dsne. the article. furnished the said
painn BY MIN since the fan Of ss wsTs not cens
bat Tes ssd hs es q % Gs
,ouss @ as Aforesaid upsGed her Tith ample mean:
20 support herself and family ns aen,es
sorced 70 d. or wss and. necessity Of DOING con
sssms somnSn or herself children
sSous admits that panta may ys nsys s ne ne
%sSarempnt esssa.y tsl'Sflh Of her domestic AFFAIRS.
Defendant denies that frequently At All
ssa aS. a. @
any srabe part thereof been in delicate or feeble
during entire portion Thereof unable
@ e u or X & ass hs e Ssss %
any ssa a % Sss
81 S %sdss Ssns. Gs . e
Ssasn ii. 3; & q o
her hs attendance % or Of mp 2. any
w in OSd IS O s a hap or Sa
win shs. medicines medical m or RrSper
q failure or rsasa Of the s 80
al On cnarisy s o. Gfr snds But ON the
DEFENDANT that he has always ana At all times iur
and spsh @e.cSss @ and %sSs % n n
Defendant dsni.. tina. IL the month Of Nay ls7s a.
informed psIntir that he would never again IN any
s % % a
her or her s % ON eoa
ant has freauentiy furnished her Of subsistence
si n s1 with s sSSd dwsns
that he hs: snS.sds: y S picrm.9r
have owned had sissn to her Or amy amy
she not compelled to do and that there was
s = ~ ssssa s "Iss
IN 'e house as aforesaid on or about the
i''n oAy OIL 'uiy' i''S sxRxs or pxuArs. s~r
Defendant denies that he has Or had for period Of
deserted p,aan or sssenea S amse rom her society
nss e. AIM ps
nat e forth or for any nesIcct bad cruel or ahuman
fnd ,sS PsinsSia and
a S q, Or wes9s N nss
insmsSn and Ss,s that
able fee for solicitors and counsel
ing si per month Would be reasonabe allowance to
lhe pisnna even u defendant @ was under any Legal
proper medical attendance OF said plaintiff and her
A LARGE FAMILY AND A sxcGARLY INCOME.
s II % Ia
I s &c his Se
M ns HI: a $
rom s M s his and every source does not
s.d 5hs :,s time % q &. the :sS
three persons. all Of whom dependent upon this
MEaPrMssA S1Rfs anu
q 2snsg .s .ssS.s re ss.
heard read the foregoing answer and and
sSs ISs
his Gr and snG as TO s.7. hoss ss s
defendant in the above entitled suit vorvo
subscribed and sworn to before me tins 18th DAY o.
August 1874 -JosHrn r. NouSNAS, Clerk.
PROOF OF ANN ELIzAs FORMER DIVORCE.
} As Brigham Young is prophet Of the Lord ant
knows somewhat more Of truth and heaven a,
} says, than any other man, his statement abou
Ann Eliza ana the actual fact to the contrary
worth preserving. as be is charged with perjur]
and will have to answer IL. Mrs. Ann Eliza ayers
that the divorce which Brigham here denies wai
readily granted through Brigham's interest witt
the Probate Judge, and that ne tBreham) did send
Delegate Cannon with letter to the Probate
Judge to effect this purpose. On the grave charge
OF perjury against the Prophet sought evidence
Of the divorce and was furnished with this tran
script from the records:-
page $40 1866 Dec g. Ten o'clock A. NJ Cour
Records of and and signed
fhe case OF Ann Eliza Dee vs. James 1. Dee., in 81
hs PETITION Of formerly E1s
JsOn s%es appeSr weSf
and Ann W vns being swoT9 and the aissa
hs s1d
by the Court that the bonds Of narimony heretofore
n s Dc Ann d Eliza s
and rstain the custody and control OF her two ntan
Z. SMITH Judge.
The first part Of Brigham's defence here goes to
the wind, for there is nothing more certain than
that the divorce Of Ann Eliza Dee from James l.
Dee was fact patent to all here. and to no one
was 1t more certain than 1t was TO Brigham him
SELF. Why he should be so unwse as 10 act in thii
manner no one can guess.
WIVES OR CONCCBTNEs'
But he stumbles into worse difficulty when be
makes the statement ''that the said Mary Ann
Angel ibis first wife), who is still living, theI
and there Tin Omo) became, and ever since has
been and still is, the Lawful vile OF this delendant'
This assertion taat his first wle IS the lawful vile
implies that all the others thing else thar
lawful, and right over this there will be glorious
row between rebellious plural wives and theil
poly ygamic husbands.
o. Up 70 this time the Mormon Prophet, apostles
and elders have demanded that their second OF
tenth wives be received with all the honors &C
corded to the first wife, and indeed BriRham's IA
vorte wife, to whom ne introduces AL the Gentle:
that become familiar with nim, ID lis seventeen til
wife. 1t is rarely that any one sees Mrs. Young
number one. she is most excellent slsdy, but II
very ieeble
"a PLAY UPON woRDsn ral ~
The attorneys Tor Mrs. Ann Eliza will presen
In court the evidence That TIE plural marriages
are performed In the Mormon Endowment House
by the same priests In the same manner N the
same language and with the same ceremony as thai
or the marriage OF the hrst or legal wives, and rha
1t is but play upon words say that the 'celes.
tlal marriageV Is anything different from the Legal