New-York tribune., 1874-01-29
United STATES SUPREME COURT.

WAsuINGToN Jan. 28-No. 2O6-Hershfield ct al.
Sf,s ots va. a. a. on By Gr ana Thompson ia the bra
Court of the Territory against one starr and smother named ena
the form bill settlement, Of an ceOa1 for oaitas
sSs %srsh.nSs so dust aaf0. i pS.s ' | IL
%snt Of P 0qpS P;F m ,a & a. aSs H. o sss
or.sagd The verdict and judgment sustained the Of the pa
the inrener, deed and the case brought r
the ,Ppea manas hs. hs questions IS on on H neus AZ %
equitable az .ad @ s hs Hqgsr '" ~. reu
the distinction between chanceV aud common a. poceedns. ss
cannot be obTtsed in FEEDERS, The pooesss. ss.a
hay. been soaoceT and was o. ,sd
No. 203-Robertson ct sg Carson appeal rom 'ns Ofe1s
SSS.t Sa. ~ 0 Sss sssn usr the viii Of one
pointing them executors 9sy S.os voc % 20, s ss
srs when and that @ ,
n this case mortgage the purchase
portion Of tue the purchase De nvIs no S &
faction Of The mG5sass .1s Of iDrumeus senr ..:
SSeTt e n. aIpu, Sas Il. hands Of before
legacy then became trs'un and hey sno @ d s, he on
well the trustee ws charged with respooons @
as5 that 5e 81 ds of the mortgage wa.
that the morts,ge l valid and ;GSsns sa s ss
Of the executors This assigned the srsunss. y
ebssd With the failure Of the and that the parh.
v. SSgq %, % @ e: gs sssssa
No l9l-sour Cit, aud Pac6c Railroad Company stou.
to the Circuit Court This action TO reeove, M
injuries sustained BY child years Of age in PLAYING on tar.S.
whether negligence the part Of the Company b leave se h
and & SpeG ", 10 the 10 he shss. s
negligence was question Of law o se s SoGr 20 the u oss
for % c 5 5 sts rs' va. HSu v sHc @ h n2
there sTsG. .moay 1fns eHSas to SST csn
% the J.s 70 tier s 'fs1 sss o. pSsc Hunt
opinion ., tn, Ro,,m,u,. Saving Io.,uion, spv.s
from the Circuit Court MssourThis bill died BY rf'y
surviving of Darby bankrupt 10 recover money pal,
which be hsd paid usuous interest IL vas ADMITTED tos s
u.ury withou. objection but Oneniei that bsra b.ot
when the asSry wa, p t1e s % D 1s the Sa, III. sss
under the against This Court bold
not tainted usu Darby back the sbo saa
when Darby suug personally could recover only s ei ss
and IS entitled to recover Only what D'ey' estate H.
whole transfer the creditors Of Darby sun .
ing o GOO which he ns owned y T Si no
contracts affected With psuy 10 this way The ei @ s,s & X
paid Reversed with Of accommodation notes 90 .hss
b. "a. Circuit Court to ascertain in some proper way the
interest paid thereon and to enlarge the 50 as TO recover M
Davis delivered the opinion =. n.
Prt Judicial Court Of Hamilton County IN ere, 90
ne verdict is.ns, the cS.p.ny on o poy Of s s
Of night under the statutes q toe state At the ns
r rm e the Circuit Court Of the Uni States
died and the % % @ the x,D pef Of % d
ovrrued plaintiff below was granted leave aud hed "A
petition, 10
is below upon petition m the District Coart ef
the county obtained reversal Of the order Of removal
The plaintiff in error made application to the Supreme Cosn
Of file petition In error to reverse the order Of s
District which refused the Supreme Court sreo e9
,Srmne the order OF removal District Court seesa
n. Common Pleas which resulted tuess
for the which Affirmed BY the District Cea
brought the order Oh tn
reversing the conended that the aa "
removed the Of the State Coan
the The Court hold that the cause vas %
and that the painun oeo~ nA
submitted motions therein made was e.s"ppea
further courts and reverse tne
and Judgment the District Cour With dcnors 70 -
Cont 10 rurher the Justice swsyne de'e w
opinion. - - c -. n. yh., nbds.
No 58-The American WoodPaper Company ag Inc roef p
grstug Company No. l57 the latter as the iofnsr spP
rom The Circuit Court Of Bss,sn District Of Newior-n
bill fled by the Paper Company restrain W e 49,
egrsng Company Of several patents alleged 20 be the properly
plaintiff for the manufacture Of pulp and soer rom o. ~ ~
vegetable The decree below ioa9n ohe
patents another valid and the Dnes'
COMPANY inpeers and third found not - have on ~
nnged both appealed 10 tbs Cou s
decree affirmed each party to pay bis osa costs
Justice Strong delivered the opinion. - . psaa,
No l89-Tmlnron and Weldon Rarsad COMPANY ,s, Sh'"'
srror 10 Supreme Court Of Appeals OF VngnA-Dsm'ss'