, 1874-08-25

OF man like Henry Wart Deecher.
A QUESTION or vEnAurrY."
II, Looking nt the Testimony is Whole, " Il Is not Diff
so 10 aGe hat tEo entire case turns question OF
ArH. I11son and Monlton, to the cu,fcsA1ons d..
,9rs the ruhlio It III mainly between Deechcr and
cresibiy Of thcso witnesses, We nuy safeiy sas at
sn nus ~ powers Of recollection Of tho business
mu stsnt on tho QUO hand, the cmi-
@ Gent charactor Of Henry Warl Iccoler a. mar, OF
tyr such stupendous fabrication o., tho art st su
ht VI Meanh w nhd reApectabily. II tie crllne with
,,st wsh u Mr. I: neee9r e t. charged d Improbable o
charged upon Mr. Moulton. According AZ poopio sa.
ecsept oe theory the other If tho case their orin-
III III m Gac' Convictions Oh the subject out Of
IT, re Asetl not remark how utterly unsatisfactory also
un1 ~ tns 'ters to sustain Mr ueseher upon the
eeallty Of ls conviction BY jury In cas, hat l,aH
from the first bern fu Of etarting Developments,
nai u irampn rSepn '9 M hazardous oyet w. to rono!nsa
sne u1s n aaa reason to fear that tie cloud which bus
praaccr Ta,c apw ~ upon tue nau of Americas greatest
HouLTohS W1lp DESERVING or NO CREDIT"
Tho public ureax hs e s,taw c. Ma;tcs ts.s r,,.ror
eon,ant. Eyen II eecher wcre guilty of all TINT tho
I%!!ossome fancy of lon lus ciared ii wnlld not
aetfys afys ~" a pfnof s Of Moons peray e wa4 tia
ttancea around Mr. l,coslcr, ~. Mumltom hse |
anlEaehei himself. 11A word ia deserving Of no |
Gtoait, saYs ~ supported by otler t,gs. Tas dac-
gnA 10 furnishes n0t to be taken au proof till
10 scrutiny for huya 10 remember thnt
hlRs accusation nf DGecler utnreI fur undo
uaoo lfoot III apology which ltbulton iabricatcd, nl,l
as Harbls'g has already been unserupuollAIy i,seL
is 'nese - feaaon to SUSPECT forgery Nc remember
a!aos tat aftor thu Tnn Htary wna published III thu
woodruff paper both IiItpn and MoilJ(ou took lm!us
alpe, ''"'' '''' - ""S "''''''
: oAaRof III HARAoHtzEn WITH THE PRESUMPTION
or lhNouEHuEh
,,,. From ahs f't.taauti t"muIereidi. |
tu.Ben ~ Monltons plain and blsEeasks statement,
uat " u lhtcRi!!o OIL tbs hyIothcs!a OF Jeerhera
tHi! Ails! Sanlut l'a AAr1nuhzed with tic rresump-
'oA OK h1s innocenee without violating common
ehse. II innoccn, Mr.. Drcehcr l1ns involved him.
~ ~ att-work If suspicious cyleuce ulors tutri-
49, t.1aA wa rgms1nber any Innocent msn Byor to
lAte been caught.
aloaton nnd Tilton may bu di4honorab!e ,ncn,-wa
e1tor affirm nor deny Int iu tls light Of the t&ocu
eyiaenrs now baforo tsc public, what they
OF Ao~ they havo conducted themselves IT yAry
VA consequence Air. Neoullur'a lettterH nre tAe
lost powerful crn1nasl1g eyiIuncs against HIN yet
Founcet!. If1a correspondents md thu NDw York Cd
oss ay write down Illtun nu.l aIouitul; thoy will
Unable 10 build np faith III Uceshors n0:cucs In |
10 lace OF aEdonee ho has Alnself furnished.
"T1ME!H
,r,. ffam ahs ciaei"n.H Enquirer.
tAa rfepot'iosailce Of evidences Ia overwhelmingly
tansl bccslcr. i1o hAa easenal Witnesses it! is
sor saso mr. Tlito ind she coft Rses hrrtef llar
~ tas confessed lloEAef an s4ltorcya bntycs con-
aeft her lust confession, II any. must Eo conHslcr-
T. iEsro arc larRs number Of documents and lot
rs II sy1Aenre, hut uot oue Of them points 1alnIy
"afa Asse1srs Innocence. while Ill of lAsm ME Qen-