The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1874-02-01
SUPREME C0usT-cRAmBERS.
The New York stock Mining Board
Dissolved.

D2bSOlVeOs
Before Judge Lawrence.
, The New York Stock Mining Board, which arose
Unto being during the flush times Of Colorado gold
mines and Nevada silver mountains and petroleum.
ever-nOwing oil and eternally dividend producing
wells, into and after which Ell DOrados the je,IBeSSe
dOree of the metropolis rushed with an avidlty
that has characterized no speculations since the
bays OF the Dutch tulip mania or the South Sea
bubble, has met with an ending as abrupt as It's
beginning. During Its brief existence, however, It
the great Ell Dorado or land OF Ophir Wen OF
the stald banker as OF the head-leve Knckerbocker
merchants, who used TO wag their heads obviously
and put long faces at the very mention OF stocks
DR. speculation, and OF the over-conhdent but not
prescriptions clerk and cashier VINO lmblDed the
Inspiration OF venture from their elders. In short,
the New York Stock Mining Board has dissolved.
An application was made yesterday III this Court
by J. W. Gerard, Jr., on behalf OF certain members
OF the Board for its final winding up and dissolu-
lion, the action being concurred in, IL Is under
stood by all the other members; and there being
Eurplus OF about $4,000 TO DIVIDE, Judge Lawrence,
on consent OF Mr.. Denton, representing the de-
PENDANTS In the action appointed Gilbert L. Haight
khe former President receiver OF all the property
Of the concern on giving security IN the sum OF
100000. Whatever effects may come into the hands
Of the receiver are to De distributed among the
members OF the association by Judgment OF tue
Court, after the payment OF liabilities.
injunction Against the steinway Hall
ProPrietors.
The Society for the Reformation OF Juvenile De-
nnquents, or rather doubtless its legal repre-
seDtatives, have discovered the fact that the pro-
prietors OF Steinway Hall have laled to procure a
license as place Of public amusement. As, under
the act OF May %. 1872 the ue, amounting TO $3.50,
imposed on account OF such failure, goes to the
society named, the discovery OF this fact, pecu-
MARTY considered, Is worth while With view to
obtaining the fine, and also to compel the procur-
ing OF license, application was made yesterday
In this Court Tor an injunction restraining the pro-
prietors of Steinway Hall from catering TO the
public taste for amusements in almost any lmagln-
able way, lecturing though not specified, beng
evidently about the only thing excepted. Judge
Lawrence granted the application, and the proba-
Die result Will, doubtless, be payment OF fine for
past offences and taking out q license Tor the
hture.
Decisions.
Resented VS.. Observation-Disclosures granted.
In the matter &C., Srau Of; FolkeDning VS.. Quinn
roscano VS.. Toscano: chamberlain VS.. Cummlns,
kc.-Mem0randums.
Holleim VS.. Ruffner.-Costs 70 be re-taXed.
Morrison vs.. Morrison.-MotiOn denied.
Appleby vs. Aston Insurance COmpany.-AllOw
tnce OF $500 to plaintiff
Churchill VS.. Downs; Same VS.. Same.-Motion
granted.
In the matter. &c, Wilson VS.. Benton; Bovine VS..
Bowne.-Granted
BY Judge Donohue.
Appleton VS.. Bowles; AUSTIN VS.. Hobrough.-
Granted.
Dimond VS.. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.
In the matter &c. Johnston. difference
ordered.