, 1874-06-18
The De Koven Clergy Four
Times Elect j. FL. r.
Brown.
The Kemper Laity Four Times RI.
fuse to Concur.
Fina! Reference Of the Whole Matter TO
a Conference Committee.
Do Koven and Kemper Bury the
Hatohet and Unite on Welles.
Sketch Of the New Bislop---The
Conservation, etc.

Sl1etcl, Of the New Bishop--~The
Conservation, etc.
Sptefat Dttpatch to 1+h4 Chicago Tribune.
MILWAUKEE, Wis.,, Juno 17.-Tho Episcopal
Convention met again at Q o'clock this morning,
Dr.. pradt in the chair. The attendance Of delo-
gatos WA larger than yesterday, several lsy1non
having arrived during tho night.
Mr. King moved TINT tho rulos Of tho 1ast
Council be adopted.
GAG LAW.
Mr.; Strong moved Is an amendment ttat they
be adopted, but TINT 1t should be in order to
proceed to the election OF Bishop at any timo,
II tho majority Of tho Council by vote should so
determine.
: Mr. Pulling, Of Beaver Dam, offered the fol<
lowing ns MI amendment to the amendment:
m% hn I'd t. h
this afternoon at o'clock, without oral nomination
md without debate; and that tho bnllotng ahall
ttn,e until Bishop Ia elected, unesa tho Convention
othcrwiso orslcrA.
DR.. EveEhart hoped tho substitute would bc
modified. Tho Council could not, with any de- |
Grco Of proprioty, adopt the resolution since 1t |
would cut off oral nominations. ALI wore in i
favor of cutting OF debate, but tley cortainly
wanted to know who tho nominees wero for the
high nnd holy Office of Bishop. To prevent TINT
was to apply the gag law. 1t Was bcttor to 60
about tho election in MI open, candid way; int
my other, tho selection would not DO Hatis-
factory.
Alr. Wooaelo sasd It waB not right to yield To u
caucus and forastal1 tho action Of n corporate
body like tho Council. Ho objected to cutting
off oral nominatious. To submit to tho will OF
i13Hf1 IN fInf3
Tho Council was uudcr tho guidance of the Holy
Spirit. They prayed for tint, md
THE PRAYER WAS A LIE
In tho mouths Of tho mon who wont into tho
caucl1B
Several delegates called tho speaker to order.
4 lnenlbor asked II tlloro worc oral noinua-
tions when tho APOSTLES gayo forth their lots.
Mr.. Spalding thought it incompetent for the
tions Of candidates, and ho should DO sorry to
HOO resolution passed which would forco q
nomination upon the Council, 10 Tint thoy would
fool as ie they had acted in ignorance: Tho
natnos Of cRi,di{aatcs should bo montionod. and,
il necessary, n reecas taken III order to loarn it
thoy wero quali1lod, and Which was tho best nun.
4 nomination should not be torccd upon tho
Church Of God, but they should come to con-
cluslon Soberly, and III tho foar OF God.
Alr. Eycrlart desired to road from tho Scrip
lures, to mako point, and began reading, but
WIS int9rrupted oy ar; pu'ing, WHO said whilo
tho roading Of tho Holy Scripturos wns proper
at any time, they hnd business to d. and lo
moved the previous question
Or. Dokoven claimed TINT tho previous ques-
tion could not bo moved in au Episcopal Gouu-
Gil.
The CHAIR sustained Ills position.
MIR. Wright asked if tho body was
GOING IT nL1Sn,
and would submit to have some ono spruna
upon tho Convention without time to Inquire
into Ills availability.
DR.. Egan believed tho minds of the clergy
were made IN as to whom thoy we're to vote for.
If tie iaity wanted information aftor tile nomi-
a.os t%a% a TS[o f4n maa tho T. resolution lid not cut
Dr, Dc koyen did 1lot imagiue TINT any ono de-
sirol to mako iuyidlo,ls roIuarks about tba
nominees, bit lo wns s,1ro all wantoll to h.nr
what rocomnnnda tons thcv ha1 thnt tho" ~ ,n;,,hh
yntn ndvisotI|y. T'Jo rosontion ,,rosunnnsod tSat
tho doo.ntea Ind como With thoir mind mn,lo n,,
and would not cIango it. Fhose who Lad not t
nnt ho faoI Us @ n
nomo1 two wien t,ave doa;roJ r. oioct r s,c.
cessor to Judas. and INV Should tho Couuci, not
bo coutont to de m tboy did :?
Mr., lfinst,o1 asite,l II In fDo Enver1 woa ccr.
tain tint the Nominations Of tho Aplstlo wora
mt hy hnlots,
Dr.. De- Koyen reoliod TINT ha Ind uot been
aonno;ntod viii tI,n An"utIna Ink L." was 1,,rt.i,,
tley Ind no balIot. .6oxos, 1Iaurntor,l II w. ''''
Nir. Williamson favored proceeding without
nomnationH nn1 iol,nto thnt 1iHarrenub}n
sccmos u,cl, oa in5 n1,nro ctoriyod },n Hruv;o,,a
9senue1 nuon W hau cnnths.1'l1oa 'ne P'of'o"n
A."s ~ "'0t.S"' :, 80,
Mr.. wright snld something about the laty
being tramme1cd, but ho was called to oraor.
Mr. Wootlolt claimed tint If tho Council woro
nat mortra.ed by tin two oaucnsas n unaui-
1880, aS 49, 49, r6at,I;n @6;t,t; - J ~ 1t; % ~ ;i.t H. ~ ~
Dr. Coo rcmarind Inu That It was nonubo VII that
,,c,n u t Apn 'nnh @ ~ "In ,rn,, at +
''. a""t A1Hn ~ 1''no IT,. ,ana "uu ;aa
m,,I;,, tt .t.o u ,ro ,snra .o.,.,
,zm,, 1 t", ',t " o III ha ill., ~
.1t1R 1ttasl tnoto onknt ~ W. ~ ~ my "u's ~
o na1od o IN eJ ,attor ~ a1aH n v TX
u eo 1Hon tn' ~ s1t , W ~ ses' I;;y5i ~ ta'
'|fH0 Sfr rhtins 'tdh tFnid 10 % lad w not outvrod any