, 1874-01-17

asn ss-o mention expressly the Evangelical Lutheran church together with the recognized
ohurhea
The public announcement Court here enacted must as matter f ooune,t take place on the
om1yC G Oh T me JuFWoucn IN IN que Sn ana can can pc erected emer by inc PMeS con-
Judge entry herfs made in the ordinary Courtprdood (r 2 leter of goth june 1851 from
the Ministry of Finance
Out Ofthe enaonmas provided in Ordinance 2@h April 1924 g. prescribing the duties to
be observed by ministers before publishing banns thu provision sub NJ. 2 which enaca that both
parties mutbe confirmed and musth avepa rken otes arement of the lords Supper is arady
by keSnP OF ism May B@-Whch extends the Or1nance 3oh April 1924 to be valid here
lhmted to apply solely to members of the Evangelical lutheran Church; and hem@h the exemption
ing in the case of Lltransc certificate of having left sohoob instead of certificate of confirmation
no occasion has been found. The enmament of Ordinance 8Mh April 1924 8 No 10 concerning
ureunded pOrreief being an impeachment to the contraction of marriage is already repealed by
Ordinance 26h September 1860.
The formula of adnonhion which, it's thought should be appended to the Ordinance. rather
than being REFEREED as matte to be drawn up afterwards is that prescribed for the Mother
Country by letter of goth June 1851 from the Ministry of Justice
Concerning the wording oho first part of the see the observation above made d l and 2
which will comparatively as well aionndcan5 find the most general application, hr impor
tat that the be wOded in such manner to place the mmnerO Of application beyond a
doubt
If besides the access to the rite ofmnire administered by either oro two ministers in
question, thee enrolment That the bmn8m u be published by the minister roth bride were re-
tmeds udlr retention womdi the future give rise toe conflicts hwoad especially be within the
power of the Roman Catholic cepymen-who according to The conception po68d by their
Church, cannot in ritual point of view, recognize the marriage consrned by Protestant
marriages in which one tho parties is Chdoic-b place difficulties necessarily in the way
had to perform em anigerh; and would but till accord with the spirit ofho present measure
that in precinct as limited as tt fHe Ordinance, the guarantee for the upreof the bans
being attained is even minor degree, impaired by the circumstance of the ans being pub
the bms are to be published in the congregation of the minister who to perform the mar
From similar, although h. wiHy, considerations, it has been presumed that the enactment
to the fleet that the performance of the marriage is be left to the minister of the BRIDE md by
cet huught the ministerial ncrd of the officiating minister be transferred to the Common Mne-
rial Record fol- all the congregations which already is kept in St CT tx adn intended to be im.
ted for ST. Thomas and St john. does indeed, follow from Ordinance 3OHh April 1924 SI4,
that the administration of the mariagerte unjust be entered in the ministerial record of the Hca-
ing minister but@ tbe enactment there closely connected With the prescription that the marriage
SHALL also, be reported to and recorded by the iONtr of tn BRIDE it has beend deemed cOreot to
insert the enactment here.
The restrictions already mentioned hitherto resting on Catholics in marriage with Luberan8
and IN Iuaeies in marriage with Christians with regard I" I'll" bdnsog up of the children are by
this repealed, in suha manner thu" the different religious congregations are, also relative ote
lutheran church. placed ona fOodngo equality
vu1o. oA~t ouwoynJrr with tho DomEn Of law in uair & IN upn He