Belmont chronicle. [volume] (St. Clairsville, Ohio) 1855-1973, 1874-07-09
COURT REPORT.
JUDGE r. E. CHAMBERS, presiding.

Thursday, June 3O.-Moses Kline VI
John Barry; heard on motion to dis
miss for want of jurisdiction; motion
overruled.
CLANCY A House VS. John H Piper
heard on demurrer of plaintiff to de
PENDANTS answer; demurrer sustained
Sarah OBierne vs. Village Martini
Ferry; heard on petition in error, anl
record and proceedings of Mayor
Court; error found and judgment re
versed.
Henry Floto vs. Village Martin.
Ferry; same as above.
E Adams VS. VIM Sutton; heard OF
motion to discharge attachment; at
tachment discharged; verdict in favOl
of plaintiff for sIO2 IS.
Dilly Ann Riggs VS.. Robert Sherry
dismissed without prejudice at cost
OF plaintiff.
VIM Talbot vs. Hezekiah Murphy
ct al Executors; to Court; verdict in
favor of plaintiff for 81, ,l2S 39.
WIN Reed VS. John K Warfield; heard
on motion to dismiss appeal; motion
sustained.
Michael Burns VS. Andrew Sheets ct
al; tried to Court; injunction heretofore
allowed made perpetual; notice of ap.
peal TO District Court.
Matthew S rrimble vs Peter. Help.
bringer; heard on motion TO set aside
verdict and grant new trial; ordered
that verdict be set aside; defendants
counsel excepts.
Rebecca O'Neil vs. Moses Kline; yer.
dict by jury under Adair Law; ordered
that plaintiff recover of defendant
$lS7 SO.
State OF Ohio vs. Christopher Militzar
eight cases; indictment under 81 Sec.
Liquor Law; to jury; verdic, of guilty.
State of Ohio VS. Chris. MiIitzer; sew
en- indictments for sale of liquor; Plea
of guilty in three of the cases; noIlf
pr0SeQm entered ia four cases by the
attorney for the State.
NJ l. Parke VS. A p Heaton; judg-
ment confessed for STA 30.
State of Ohio VS. Christian Waller;
manslaughtel; the defendant being in
open Court and having .lothing TO urge
Why the sentence Of the law should
not be passed upon him, was sentenced
to the Penitentiary for five years.
James A Gray vs. b F West ct al;
ordered that decree of sale be modi-
fed so as to include certain distillery
lot, and that cause be continued.
Henry F Odell vs. VIM Smith Ex-
ecurOr; judgment by default for s239 &C.
John Bradfield VS. Robert FL Parsons
ct al; to Court; found due Plaintiff
1886 20, and the defendants liens mar
shalled.
Oliver f Demings VS. Caleb Stidd;
cause settled; the plaintiff to recover Of
defendant 81. l62 and costs.
Mary NJ CroZier vs. Sarah McWil-
liams; heard on demurrer to plaintiffs
petition; demurrer sustained and cause
dismissed without prejudice to new
action at costs of plaintiff.
Robert Cowen Administrator VS. A
l. Harper; leave givea defendant to an.
swer in forty days after term.
Orion + Grove vs. David Pangle ct
al; report of sale of mortgaged prem
ises by Master Commissioners; confirm
ed and deed ordered.
Mechanics Building Association VS.
Otho Gilmore ct al; report of Master
Commissioner confirmed and deed or
dered.
State of Ohio vs. John Stevens; indict-
meDt under 4th Sec. Liquor Law; to
jury; verdict of guilty; sentenced to
pay fine of $50, and be confined in
the County Jail for twenty days. In
two other cases by leave of the Court
the attorney for the State entered a
notie prosequi.
State OF Ohio vs Barley Hoge; in
dicted for selling liquor to a person in
the habit of getting intoxicated; to a
jury; verdict Of mot guilty.
Daniel Rife VS. John Allen; heard on
motion to set aside verdict and grant
a new trial; motion overruled to which
plaintiffs counsel excepted and filed Il
bill OF exceptions which We're ordered
to be made part of the record in the
cause.
VIM Dixon VS.. D W Sheets ct all;
Judgment by default for 1905 81 and
that Andrew Sheets is surety for de-
fendant.
State of Ohio VS. Fox & Henderson,;
fifteen indictments for selling liquor TO
persons i'm the habit of becoming intox-
icated; plea of guilty entered in four
cases and nOU prosequi entered as to
balance; total fine 500 and twenty
days in the County Jail.
State OF Ohio vs. Thos Hart; the de-
fendant entered into recognizance
in the sum of $500, for his appearance
ut the first day of next term Of Court.
q b Davenport VS. Mary Laws ct
al; report of Master Commissioner con-
tirmed and deed ordered.