The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1874-06-11


tinue to constitute the room nuisance
is question for the jury to determine
The jury were out about an hour, anc
then returned verdict of guilty. Al
defendant claims that he has quit the
business, his fine was fixed at $50 ant
costs.
VIM. T. Washam VS.. David Edwards
Foreclosure of mortgage Amount found
due, S4S.5O. Order for sale of mortgageo
premises.
Lizzie Hughes VS.. William Snider ct
al Order of partition issued
Thomas P. Sutherland VS.. William c.
Mccoy et al Foreclosure of mortgage
Amount found due plaintiff, S519.66, due
Forrest Harmon on prior mortgage
s34OS3. due George Dever on prior mort
gage, $3O9.65. Order for sale of mort
gagged premises.
James S. knighton VS.. Joseph A.
Knighton. Judgment by default for
| $21044; and order for sale of n1ortgaged
premises. :.
Grimsly Poor VS. Neil W. Elliott Par
IltlOn. IlaiullA SiSCtcu " eN>S NAN
lands at the appraisement, and deed or
dered.
Caleb A Shires VS.. David Kell and
wife, Luther NJ. Beman, and Beman and
Jones. Foreclosure of mortgage. Amt.
found due plaintiff. s5949s, amount due
Luther NJ. Beman S4Sl20, amount due
Beman G. Jones, $1I027 Order for sale
of mortgaged premises.
Smiley Caldwell VS.. Elijah Sickels ct.
al. Foreclosure of mortgage. Amount
found due, $555.43, and order for sale of
mortgaged premises.
John I. Leach, Ex, VS.. Manuel Leach (,
ct. al. Sale confirmed and deed ordered.
Elizabeth Hughes VS.. D. W. Winfough-
This case, and a number of others, were
brought by plaintiff for dover in lands
once owned by her late husband, James
Hughes Security for costs demanded.
Security entered, and cases continued.
Peter Bum VS.. James Erlenwine. Or
der for revival of judgment, for Sl46.69-
Court met Monday morning and the
criminal docket was called. Several par
ties were arraigned, and on pleas of
guilty several cases were disposed of as
follows:
State of Ohio VS.. VIM. Spurrier. In
dictment for being found in a state of in
toxication. Plea gnilty, and fine of five
dollars assessed.
State of Ohio vs. Gabriel Poor. In
dictment for being found in state of
intoxication. Plea guilty, and fine of
five dollars and costs assessed.
State of Ohio VS.. Leander Smith. In
dictment for being found in state of
intoxication. Plea guilty, and fine of
five dollars assessed
State of Ohio VS. William Ward Four
indictments for selling Intoxicating liq-
uors in violation of law Plea guilty,
and fine of ten dollars in each case as
sessed.
State of Ohio vs. Warren Gilliland and
Leander Smith. Indictment for fighting
by agreement. Plea guilty, and fine of
ten dollars assessed against each party.
State of Ohio VS.. Felix Nash. Indict-
ment foY being found in state of intox-
ication. Plea not guilty. Tried by the
Court.
Peter Bum testified that on the 25d
of May, 1874, he saw the defendant,
Nash, in the store of Price & Brother,
in jackson, and that he was intoxicated.
He could not walk straight, and he, (wit-
messy could smell liquor on his breath.
III al Al,a4 IL
out in wagon with Nash, and that he
had not been drinking at all.
Jesse Clark testified that Nash was
not intoxicated
The Court decided that the defendant
was not guilty.
State of Ohio VS.. Daniel McKeever
Indictment for selling Intoxicating liq-
uors to Thomas Keenan,, minor. Plea,
not guilty. Jury trial.
Thomas keenan, testified that he was
cutting cordwood for Latrobe Furnace,
on the lands of Beverly keenan,, his half
brother. He got some hands to chop
for him, and wanted to furnish them
some whisky. He went to Beverly Kee-
nan, who was his guardian and told him
he wanted some money to get whisky for
the hands, and his guardian gave him a
dollar. Thomas then went to McKeevers
and asked him for halfgallon of whis-
ky. McKeever told him that he could
not let him have it, as he was too young.
Witness is nearly eighteen, and has
always lived in Berlin, and McKeever
knew his age. Witness then asked for
jug, and McKeever told him that he
had but one Jug and that was cracked.
McKeever got the jug and stopped the
crack with tallow, and set the jug aside.
Keenan, then went out, as he says, to get
some one to get the whisky for him. He
found VIM. Shields, a son-in-law of Nc
Keever, and gave him the money.
Shields went and got the whisky, Nc
Keever put it into the jug, Shields took
it out and gave it to Keenan,. The State
claimed that McKeeVer knew when he
fixed the crack in the jug and set it aside
that Keenan, was to get some one to come
in and get the whisky and this was de-
vice to evade the law. The defense
claimed that McKeever did not know
that the whisky was for the boy. Jury
failed to agree.
State of Ohio VS.. Daniel McKeever.
This was an indictment for selling one
gallon of whisky to Clinton Eisnaugle, a
| minor The onIv witness was the .hov