, 1874-12-25
T'IiH1 CITY.
i<tHBE VS., HILL.

Kil3BE VS.. HILL.
THE DIEpa onpEuED 70 nE PRonucED.
THO caao of Kidbo rs. lillian action to e}oct
defendant and otllnra from tho occupancy Of $40
acres of lnna III tho Town Of 1iy1o rark--ca,no
IN before Judge Dlotgott, III tho United Statca
Circuit Court yesterday morning. This In tho
suit roforrcd TO ut lcngti, In Wednesdays Tn1n-
,,Nrt Iibbc wlo lives III Springfield Mass.,
Claiming title under tocl from Richard r. lob
jusnn 10 Em,son Hamilton, pnrporsing to have
bccn 1ando In 1886, aud oslo from hamilton to
llclcn O'lIara ]Inrrcll, aatd to have been oSe-
cu.od III 1912 tho aocd to Kihhc NOT having
hcc, IN yet recorded tll,a fnr. Tho painti7 Is
represented by II. i. Turner, Of Quincy, wha
clau,t to bo his ngens md attorney.
No ono was pycso,t Gil behalf Of thu plaintiff
a1r. Darn,,n,, for Hill, 1na&o a 1notlon tint All
order bc entered requiring Tho plaintiff and his
attorney (rnrner) to sepoait thu doets in court
for inspection, md III support Of tho motion
bubnlittcd
THE rorLow1sa AFFIDAVIT:
George y. Hill, ltcng duly sworn ,tc1oues ami Eaith
4}at hs IN one Of tho dcfcsas fl hn nb'sc-tntlttcd
caro- tat 10 land snyoys IN s at a. .,s ~ nsst a
deetla lately, to-wi oil thn .Ja 81 1'orcnbeE. 1874,
1cd fpr record. an1 recorded pec = ls7l ~ tue on.co
Of the Recorder al 1)aeta for Cno Cu>tny. ILL.,, where
III said ia1,tl is situate, N yoie I( If tho records Of
Sail oflvs, OF, reses coa and :ot respeetsey ono Of
!. Nobiusou ia Enpsou 1!a,ullto an tho other FROM
T,usot, 1Isttaasu Helen Q. 1lara 11arre ans1 each
II Ri II T"%i s Sor:, Of Rnn9e Il Eaxt. md tho nor-
east quarter Of Section ~ M fowi. ;s North. Of lane
u cart # We sh!sa principal erlaa tssng .s. tug
~ Ihs deponcnt fnrther aays that tle os1g'nSla or
Withdrawn from the said NccostlcrH uilicc. un in
.le ,,osscssto nr power o I.nlolplls X. Turner by
. # h tne h n nd 1ss taa 70 noTnsy cs n
10 prove, aenr. 10 prove, tlo In tho plainit to
thd aIs u s s nsrs , aa;1 at e ,.9 TIT e.c1,
,y!de,cs pertinent to the i6saes in sud ca,so within
the neat: aud Intent oi .ho ,ntt section q tue
tlc s,ato Of Illinois, cn!it!c1. "Eyidenso and Dcpo
kNtous."
this elit lrryc their titIo to thu ians tn controversy
fruln Nchari +. Eohnaun. through nna hy tncana uf
sar'ssnuss and ess ~ t asenfs ~ a. co re s.i GiGnn5 @
pretended decd. a:oyo mentioned, md without notice
ou the art Ct thcfe defendants or a1y of their ra-
,rs:ends ; :lees aorcssa pcronsat tayeth that ho
. ry,e nu es bs.'ey,. tat thc I f' ssess-
Erai,sec, hi Il forgery, a.1 tas tho inspec,len,
nj @ Of estaSrng n i IS I md that tSa IN
Elcelnn Of said other pretended deed from E,npaon
Hamilton grantees to 1icicn offara NaEfst ~ gsat
{cs at, comparison OF tile Ba,nc with said suriae
forgea leot il + necessary una cxpedieut ,nste Of
,:oSipG and exposing ka!u suspected forgery; md
rad asun, 10 eei,ico proofs. Which. 1ur prudential
xeasn,r he forbcars to detail herc that mil pretended
ticod from said 1tobinfon 70 sad Hamilton Is i'll lRcta
forged al.l spurious deed.
1{r. Barnunl stated that notices Ind boen sent
to Quincy anl served upon Turnor Tuesaay, aud
Ao lad accepted service. ......,
The Court remarked that Tint was pretty short
notice. -
Mr. Darnun, said lo was not disposed to hurry
tho oppoBto parties. .-.....
TUE pEEDs MUST DE PRODUCED.
Tho Court then ordered n rule riat, that tho
plaintiff, or his attorney, flo tile dcnds on the
should mt be od.
Accordingly tho matter vent over until the 4th
prDxinO.