New-York tribune., 1874-12-29

snt should be mplished. snona oe sne ~
sbaIl be tnre asonaby gorhsd. DO not tIlnk DO cn
titled TO the heroic character wnch Is toas snrcs
mon him Dy nv friend Having no occasion or yinsca -
ton he yet enters heartily bravey into tns s -
preserve the reputation OF woman az anu ns pubo dec
aratiOn TO stigmatlze that ady as @ hrn and
aduerOus enough 10 force hsr 70 9se erthsr
her with the idea OF her unworthne,t or SeIs hs,
,1arrSntd me- on three or four occasions beg ave
TO siigmatize that assertion so far as II relates W NY
client n, 'asauseWbot as usteTiy npsrse; ssse;,iop,
Mr. shearman-The assertion thar he sti:nauI.d& & .ne
I,dv a. having acted in indecorous imirDWr man
npr wbi'h allows that ne 6ad any % anntslous s i, "
cations There , s no TFa cnndaon Il i. that he
asked tho question, Should III .elfie'ense turn
'Ggni SpGn s5dad a 1 DO be- asks And
here mat IN private he turned around anu ra,o'
should nave st he 20 o d lie rpuated the
that would do under any suca cHcains'sSee'
Mr. shearman~NO, nor that he could have done It:
The truth is that treated the idea with scorn aoo
has been brought up against ta,arnsl nun IN TINS way
Mr.. Beach, think the Judgment tnat ne formed ana
Hr Sn"arnan-It woali have been; hut It Is equally
true OF all who attempt TO pervert 10.
Mr.. Beach, ain not aware OF perVefsoo nor 40 90
what am instructed do not act upon the system OF
and do what my client bids and What tho necessity
OF his case NAV requre OF me to DO may Oe
in my construction aud IN the pubic op!ui1n wnsl nSs
been expressed upon the construction of M Beeoosrs
language, Van ara o,o,,ny vour client. Al, not ours;
NJ I IBSeacb-TAat ls very great mstaxe too hap
prn 10 have ndstrv and discrimination enough To read
boih sides Of this Bat my irrns oT' 700, snina
that gentleman III irGuinent ca u.ase 40 ,n a.,
dee iratlOG unless he Is moved eu6ey uuucr Ine 'n
Mr.. SLeartnan-WIl the gentleman pardon me again
know TOO much OF M ,euI0r friend BcLca to ocese
that he would make statement 80 deroeatory 70
lady or so deroe !tory @ , genIen; aaIna m i
by the necessities Of the case anu permit ina w sS
that in the course Of long series OF 'ton' Win
Reocnpr.
other than thAt Of the most unqiaIn:d ahi absolute
case down to the prescn Tine. know that for :ac
Mr.. Braeh-It Is pity he had not infused that sent
MS Committee. Sir
Mr. shearman-iie could not control them; they were
Judge Ntil.on-Thcrc nus. be silence.
Mr. Beach-Now, aHuh. ask Your Honor. attention
To- te order 10 lo ~ bg s It o pr, aner or
oath, setInE f0rtL thr partrulir times AMI PAGES a
Hy Wncn ,ecac Re sA''s 5ss OF aisry
e.. "aud that he be preelu!cd from .Etrins:
adultery at any and place uan -lall be set
forth IN the statement" Now. clearly thi' requires us
which We expect prove act Of adlrry. and tbai
(" shall De ludc from Al. ON E proJ upon ths
terry" g. Now, w y"nr iionorS ave signicAton and
effect TO the term "spccInci"
Judge NeIlsou-Tnc OppO>le OF II ia "S'1crlL"
WHAT A BILL OF PARTICULARS MIUHT TELL.
Mr. Beach-Suppose, then, prove Slr, o. clrcum-
stances that upon certain occasion when no parties
were present, Nr Be.cnrr Ut al uEseaOnaDls
hour the OF Theodore Illton. coming from
the house OF Mrs TtOn Beng H. 10 aid Of the con-
e-s0n proving confrssol OF ada tcry Iad then IL
support II proving hre crcumstdnc Of Intimate or
InducOrOus iutcrcOut~". wat doS t!at Prov, your
ouorsl have tlc confession .! tins delen ant to the
adultery, and prove tnt on particular OCCASION at
OcGck atngLt TiiidGt anv GiuSe OF reason r vas Nern
privately hoS" ~ Mr.. Ttpn ana at mat unscason
abe hour emerging from it uder circn,h OK CON
cealmen Oo"s -" rni to prove an act 1f adultery
OCCASION Doe not teud 20 prove specific act
OF adultery Oh thai O,caalOnl ANA WAC Nj. deny ~
Ani what is the renee sir. betweel an :ct ~ adn
! rry and specific acc Of adueryl An act ~ Specnt
Taere no such tAlaE a, general act OF adultery An
act ~ aaaey - ] p h. ~ ira ~ INC ana mace
anu give crcim m>Jauldi evidence indicating any
particular time pace wien an act OF ada!iery com
giving evidence 10 prove spceihc act oi aialcry anu
Mr Tracy-wby Got PUT that in the bill CT particulars,
| Mr. 8e,ch-Put that IN the bill Of particulars Are
We SIR, put our nil OF particulars ~ Jiecnc acs
OF adUltcry WIN ace and cIedm ,td4G', AL Tue eVi
Of these parties L. 'pre any of Ia waicn re-
qres IT Is there any rule OF law which requires tue
dcnsel No. SIR it cins for ae Tor :e G roc, acts ol
adultery for act waich are to he nroven w drec "v
Or lie 20. e"nr oro9 GI 70 1s I% su,d r. Plt
! at we had specllrd, a. Tie scnIlcmer
Ao@ suggest tnat wc o"Elt 10 specify. N""' II You
GUS OF mon vou VIII see rna- .nacd 'to j-
c.,n w r,l, We t. r., 'nrr rf ~ ealqe
llrd upon nc pane; id iacy wi Dc wy ."t N TINS
7 II
maps onsnacy Inc wEoie result u th' ~ al womb ne
pcr.icI ny tIi IL - a.; NIT ~ 90" w. Yea
eyiacrd our witll r - axe tAe d"IeIl.h .ht, didet
OATH, ent.reg arl i,J."I "tl ih" Wa 'cop' oi
'rr an urdr >rsll uJGr any pa s.".'. roncrlva
BE circumstance. pirate TO emOIri 81" ei mo prop
u,ton OG prooi uIJA the .lli or IA cb" hrtiOn %
/ tat cvIurnc, by tu- iur. 1 thi .'N am" thai
yUur Honor. w Mt y. GI,pnscd " ,5prpya aay sucB
order ana II, VIA la" hi!-t an Il ~h.'A 3, -:'.n
lsd with nv ,,S "ili'I 3" -! ~ 10 til
rrilection Court. yolr II ucr' go 1T prcrive
order. IN Iis eN'!H-i0n L rriF! 80 ~ c'hc act'
viii ,lect TIE rr>..t va. We A.i.e t''.. p.edIre
the c'pHnr:ass,nr.I wintl we iraa 80 .pt a'l-
! t., i,aic L aiiy c.taror. b. a..ur. sr: "'nt tn
""'.cr - NOT 70 &c cgL'.rard a. r-.A, IL ti.
plaL III from Introducing ,n The ti.ai "t - .c'.oL
1,rgioDy wIlrn may or admissible under IT, srn"raI
OF rvdchc" as 10 auy ae, Oler i"ah rc'hr t;tt
q! adultery. dtci.Ih'loIs Wri'n-, .:s.' ~ : OF auy
O'ncr alleged con' sfn@ oht" p&:t -' '' 'GthI ~
any rnch cr:.nlali, wrongful, ~ E.r"u"r att, 10
Snch i'irzri ro"itH'i"i' 90 p'Ftrl " u" % pace
''Ii oe i,!r 70 l'Fe 'srn sc.et.,I 10 M,..' 49,"
specific acts" N AI| opinion yOu villa p r"I'c-ind
lil, correct, On VII. poier'ye tnit /. Hein4es Gu
on.r upon brc .Isc suDII;. Sr 'a here c.l
c4rcnsnstlnca ~ "a, clai Lcfcr TO- "Wci have III.
iuGri proved upOH rlal wElcl will not a grea
greg p0.Gt 80 lax s called Al act %: p:hc!y
Is yoar Honor s, 10 rlle by this orcct the question
move only conf s,o, On lie pa:t Of the nianr aud
Il De sad tLai thc cx4nIc wLi pIss, ut ID
confession the part or the dc th'art, rthin the
natural Specification OF the ttrn used III order aad
shall b. uet al on,e upon the irIi VITA tnls O DIR of
exclusion shutting out that material .eUnlng evt
wnolc restriction. your Houors will he kni enough 10
ook with Some critical attention, Is confused and
obscure. Evidence admissible ulder ;ae general rE!es
II any acts other thLn specific acts OF adultery dccart
writings, cumeutS, alie ye
Of the deirnTln OF any sucn criminal wrong
fII, improper ac'>" There ScctL5 10 SIR some
grammatical iulccurlcy IN tus clause 10 properly
ted and at any rate would require aiIenimeDt.
tat, however, 10 comparatively an i;lDa.eriai Ques-
ton. Now, can only say, Sr wul.e an cOByluced
that the object Of UIii ~ particulars hLs already
obtained By the III. .gyit wni was led upnn this
ton upon behalf o! Mr. Triton, while l brlIrvc that
Just exercise Of discretion the part Of Tins court
wou!d refuse any D! OF particulars. yet II We are
mistaken in ideas or legal pr0prirty,