The Iowa plain dealer. [volume] (New Oregon, Howard County, Iowa) 1867-1895, 1874-07-10

4AN *&3h IVY ~ *##s $3.50 M@ -
sssAv 49, ssfss*A ms = " y wsss
i ~~as - ~ - "A - *svs
saas thA ~AAp4 f#ssss #'AH~i#H ~
/. AAat - 49, T. - sAs*A ~
sAAs 80 A. 4#ssssA NJ e. *s4s a
$50 Na~A - ~ sssAa y - ~
Hs s*ssA a - ~ sAAA As~sa~
sa,ust ss# t~va st~@ sA~ t.ssa aAAsAa
- es.as sss@a~s*sN. ts@sa -
ArAA Aa# - ~gH vt - - - Il
~ ssasAA ts.sss@a N sssfs+%as a
teu-s 80. 90 tt~As y ~sa* am 49,
H. ~ p@m+~s hs@&~sssA* w#r sA@Ats
.=~ -. ~ s@~sAas y shs~ lssassss
ssa h~.a~s-. 1sv~ ~ ys~sas~#s~ a
..saswsas AHa IA, h~saaset ~r = sA~na
sAAs ses.+*a sa#v sAs4s hws tsTss
t~t~s~ "a s~.~ l~ps. sAsa tss~ sssss
ssra easss~ssns ~ sass WITH Ts14#
ssslsu~a ssesans~s u ~p#sA sstve n
tn. si~~. ,he fsvs n e~s rg~@fls -
vas.s. l.ss l~sas~A ~sss%l msss% s~As
f,s.m ,hv~ sAss~sarrs ih.~ ss'A.
.lars~sss~r s~rAa y. s~A sill. snsa.
rers ~ se~.st,l~ MAN n iassass.
srss~.s carrying - nssrw 4 ~asfar
,Aas Ill r.l har "A iasrr resssea a
,h% s.iae a ~ property. md " y.
shr railroad. ss~st sh~s~ srsrs NIL 10.
sases ,he sesaa. thea ths hs~ss ran.
srs ~ VIZ s~a a~~csnt. allow the W.
jas, h ~ rsesammated. VIZ shall
watch Ne question shA s'lh',aas.
The United States tsewit rcats u
Madison Wa. has denied shr injnne
tim a,kel IN ~ The hand hckler. q
III. chkae"A N"r~rsscrn rAslsrad rrm
pan, ~ the l.. u Jaly, seeking ~ -
strain the enforcement ef the Petite
law On the rrsad thu, Il wAs vis,ra
eon6scati.n II the MONEYS they ha'
paid ~ these hnnda The court frn
,lercl Ia decision IN Saturday motninI
Judge Drammond delivering The criu
ion. We ar< informed that the ras
y ~ 70 The Supreme court cf The init
al States. We quote from The crie
ion " much ~ our space will permit
The court then hollis that The claus
IL The constitution Il Wisconsin, whr
provides that the Legislature may alto
Or repeal charters II railroads At an
time il In legal effect, Incorporated
the charter II Northwestern RAilroa
Company. aud that all share aud hone
holders took their stock ~ their sccnl
. isics subject 70 this paramount, co'.lisio
IL which they II law had notice. TN
principle II not changed By an.hcrit
from tho Legislature 70 = ecrporatio
70 consolidate with corporation II ~
other state. A. 10 rates for translor
. Ing rcrsons and property cxclaaisc)
within the limits IL Wisconsin. n
; Legislature Ind tho right II alter Il
! sSrMs u tho charter of tho Nortl
. western Railroad Company, anil Il
fart that such alteration might aac
the value u H. property O fvrnchl
/. rannot ,ourh the question u the pow
} In thc Legislature. 10 rcreAl,ts fra
, chiser would have vol nigh destroy,
!, the value u its property. aud whi'
! the laller. ~ such, could not b. sAkc
!, sim In essential value for nso VIM
|. b. gone. Thu IA. that grants II IN
!. were made Il, Congress. ~ tho Sta
] canno, uiicrs rights u corporations !
I creditors. Tho court has serlo
,loaht. q. 10 sha. part Of the law Will
regulates tho rates for property tran
!, ported frnm other states into N isco
i ain. aud from wisconsin into 9TH
States Az the question was not fal
argued. the court does not foul WI
rantcd III granting M injunction
This poiut alone II Desired hy d
: plaintiffs. !. ma, b. further considers
. W the future.
. Judge Davis added . suggestion III
y the question win ob,ioasly have u
:. decided by the t'ouss u last rcsort. q
y that harmony between plaintiff aud 4
4 PENDANT Will b. necessary " rseMs
}. early decision. liz .hcn ASKED II
. would not be better. while this llsil
= tion l. IN progress, Tor thu ltfrn.lan
= W far ~ possible, ~ have pros~'asie
y for penalties suspended. These pro-
- cutions arc not required ~ settle |
y rights, must causs serious irritation, y
/ cannot b.. Il seems " tho court, p
! duesi.s u any good."
u Ths Dispatch nay. tin. !, II rrobal
: TIM. the question ~ ~ Interstate tra|
~ referred ~ In thu sbuvs dccirion Y
u bu argued IN Chicago Friday July
III -
1. 1IALlous MONTHLY MAaAMxE !