The Superior times. [volume] (Superior, Wis.) 1870-1912, 1874-06-20

-.TATE OF WISCONSIN,, COUNTY OF DOUGLAS
= In the Circuit Court
Hamilton NJ. Peyton
against
Bronson Murray executor of the last Will and
Testament of T. Rush Spencer, deceased,
Mary NJ Spencer, Thomas NJ. Spencer,
Mary L. Wells, Almond B. Wells, Kate
Spencer and Scion II. Ciough
Whereas il appears to the satisfaction of
this Court by affidavit that the above entitled
action is brought for the partition of the
premises hereinafter described and that the
defendants Bronson Murray executor Of the
last VIII and Testament of T. Rush Spencer
deceased, Mary NJ. Spencer, Thomas NJ Spen-
Ger, Mary E. Wells, and Kate Spencer, are
parties having an interest in said premises
and lands and reside out OF this State and
cannot be found therein and that the said
Almond B. Wells is the husband of the de-
PENDANT Mary E. Wells and is necessary
party to this action and that he resides out
of this State and cannot be found therein
Now therefore on motion of Hiram HAYES
of counsel for the plaintiff, 1t is ordered that
the defendants aforesaid and they are and
each of them is hereby required to appear
and answer the complaint in this action of
the above named plaintiff now filed in the
office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, of
said Douglas County and TO serve a copy of
their or either of their answers upon Hiram
Hayes of counsel for the plaintiff at his office
in the Town Of Superior in the County of
Douglas, Wisconsin by or b fore the 18th
day of August A. d. 1874, and in case they
or either of them shall tail to answer the said
complaint within the time aforesaid as here
by required the said Circuit Court will pro-
ceed to faal judgment against them or either
of them and will grant the relief demanded
in said complaint
And it is further ordered that this order be
served upon said non-residents BY the publ
cation thereof in the Superior Times, a week
" newspaper published in said County of
Douglas once a week for six successive weeks.
the last publication TO be had lit least twenty
days prior 70 the said ! tn day Of August
1874
The description Of the premises aud lands
in the complaint described, and for the parti.
uon whereof this action Is brought il as fol-
lows, to-@it: Lots one Cd and Two y Of
Section eleven lIll ia Township forty nine
49, north Of Range fourteen I4J west, also
the north one acre and Gtty-uiue one hun
drcdths Of an acre { ! 9-I00j Of lot two (ZJ.
lot eight - lot nine (9) lot ten l0) lot
eleven an lol twelve tIZJ lot thirteen u&J
ibt 3attttH t!J} anu fpL sixteen tib3 upon
Conner. Point IN the town Of Superior ia
said county Of Douglas and State Of Hi-cou
sin. and according u the survey and sHbdi-
vision # said Common Point sud the plat Of
the same recorded in tho office Of the Regis
ter If Deeds ID aud for Tie County Of Doug
la and State aforesaid
And il j. further ordered that a copy of
this order be mailed 70 tie said defendants
forthwith upo the publication Of the same.
addressed 70 them each 81 their respective
places Of residence a. set forth IN the aiiida.
yit for this order Glcd IN sad Court.
Given under my hand at Superior in said
County Of Douglas this 18th day of June AID.
1874 GEO w. PERRY,
jun6jnll8 Co. Judge, Douglas Co, Wis.