National Republican. (Washington City (D.C.)) 1872-1888, 1874-10-17
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
H. STATES.
FRIDAY, October Is, 1874.
On motion Of Mr.. R. johnson, Thomas W. Hall,
IT,, ESQ.,, Of Baltimore, Maryland, was admitted to
practice as an attorney and counselor Of this
court
On motion of Mr.. Phillips, SamueIW. Packard.
ESQ.,, Of Chicago, Illinois, was admitted to prac-
tice a. an attorney and COUNSELOR Of this court.
No. 2 Mayor, 6c., OF Mobile, plaintiff in error,
vs. W. E. Leverich ct al. The motion 70 reinstate
this cause was argued BY Mr.. ]. d. Mcpherson in
support Of the same, and BY Mr.. P. Phillips and
No. al. The Town OF DanYille, plaintiff In
No. As. The Town Of DanvilIe, plaintiff in error,
vs. J. b. Pace. The motions TO dismiss these causes
was submitted on printed arguments BY Mr.. F. L
Smith in support Of same, and By Mr.. p. Phillips
No. sos. William II. Goodrich ct al. plaintiffs IN
error, vs.. ]. N. Beach. The motion to dismiss
this cause was submitted on printed arguments
BY Mr.. P. Phillips in support q same, and BY Mr..
No. 3. (Original) State Of Florida, complain
ant, vs.. E. O. Anderson ct al. Ordered that de-
ana mU9n T e Is SESss Ds SCI
No. 10. Bank Of Empire state, plaintiff In error,
vs.. Edwin Parsons. Dismissed with costs under
No. TO- Board Of Supervisors OF Iowa County,
plaintiff In error, vs.. The United States rel J.
q. Jerome. Dismissed with costs under 18Th rule.
No. q. NJ. O'DoWd, plaintiff in error, vs.. II. +.
Russell, sc. Dismissed with costs under 10Th
No. n S. E. Grlmth, plaintiff in error, Va E.
W; W. Gritith ct al DismiSsedW with costs under
No. Is. S. ]. Spencer, plaintiff in error. vs..
Thos. Martin, ct al. Dismissed with costs under
No. q. L. Grosholz ct al, appellants, VS.. Caro-
line Newman ct al. This cause was argued by
Mr.. @. W. Pasehel, Of counsel for the appellants,
and submitted on printed arguments BY Messrs.
John Hancock and q. s. West for the sppeliees.
No. %. Z. B, Clinkinbeard, plaintiff In error,
vs.. The United States. This cause was resub-
mitted on printed Arguments BY Messrs Hoadly
and johnson, Of counsel for the plaintiff in error,
and by Mr.. Attorney General Williams and Mr..
Solicitor General Phillips for the defendant in
error.
Adjourned until Monday at II o'clock.
SUPREME OOURT-GENERAL TERM
Chief Justice Cartier and Justices wylIe, Olin
and Macarthur sat IN bane yesterday, and were
The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company vs.
Oden Bowie. This case comes up on an appeal
from the Circuit Court, where $4,000 damages
iuries to the racing mare Australia, belonging to
Governor Bowie. During the examination Of the
defendants witness lKoontzl the defendants
counsel proposed to inquire Of him whether in
fact the mare ever was delivered to him, but the
Court refused, objection being made by the plain
to which refusal the defendant, By its counsel,
excepted. The defendant, by its counsel, then
prayed the Court TO give 10 the jury the seven In
enth instructions prayed, but refused all the
others, 10 which refusal the defendant excepted.
The plaintiff then asked the Court to give two IL
strucIions TO the Jury, which the Court gave, to
the granting Of which the defendant excepted.
After counsel had addressed the jury the Court
proceeded to charge the jury. And TO so much Of
said charge as related to what constituted sum-
Client delivery In law the defendant excepted.
The Jury in the court below found q verdict in
favor Of plaintiff for ten thousand dollars, and
the defendant, by its counsel, moved for q new
trial In the case on the bill Of exceptions Messrs.
Buchanan and:Cox appear for the railroad com
pany, and Messrs. X. Garter and Merriek for
Governor Bowie. The case was not concluded.
Adjourned.
SPECIAL TERM : Mr.. JUSTICE HUM
PHREYS.
This court was engaged as follows yesterday:
Whitney VS.. BARLEY ct al. Order discharging
Burns Is. Whittlesey. Order of reference to
auditor.
Joachim vs.. Walter, and Hoeden va Stickney.
Order diseharging restraining order.
Gunton vs.. ZanEinger. Order that trustee pay
to defendant certain sum Of money.
Segar W. Segar. Order for appearance Of alb
Bishop vs. Smith, Mclaughlin vs.. MeLaugh-
lin, and Schneider VS.. Jones. Decree taking bill
Little vs.. Little. Decree for substitution of
trustee.
The court then adjourned until tomorrow.
CRIMINAL COURT-MR. JUSTICE HUM
PHREYS.
This court was engaged as follows yesterday.
A. H. Underwood and 7. b. Warwick, forgery.
This was the last Of the cases Of the forgery Of
hremenis eertihcates The same evidence IN these
cases was brought forward week ago upon the
like trial with q verdict OF acquittal, and the
same verdict was returned yesterday.
The jury was then discharged until Tuesday.
~