, 1874-04-15

2acsto2 question rasel upon tomurrort mn.
Cd by to nt Tic meaning has hcen eorrecty stat
xt w ehs names a'a epicts rogs, choat. trckstcr
o.S afn L scI s1I5sI h. :,a.
a." 10 no doubt whntcvrr but Tint
/ n, T111H ErITHEr IL L1pILou.,
oecon with fHs1nH s aisGaney and ssnvsSr
res,:ct nsss: tos,rn!nly J, toso wors Il sed III pcato
i m Of scl attorney and coscllor anl nppliesl .e
wo In InSoon 1'noons Will AsFrooasonial occupation
Fagdp Tae dp'si!a,i # Sor'e npon himself tic
rnr H. 10 10 tho tcnniF, AMI upon demurrer, ll,c
os. at assmo that Ito meaning Inns boen correct
IL coma to tho conclusion, therefore, tst thin first
G1t o n tho dHelarson ood n' nt consequently
| THE BEcoHD COUNT
professional chnrhctor and occupation Of to nlnnlf
forth TINT as,c sollc.or anu counsellor ho lla' a.
no tsms when aud 20 forth boon eoncorne III tic
Court a county, on liz ne eansory ~ sso S here. he
OF, IN Which said s,!t ono James Knlea VIM com.
wa. Sn'n totsnd,,. sna hta we Sno Jesana Knfss
Mh Wy sktlt care Judgment md inteNry md 10 forth
but conrlying 10 inturo Tho p!aintiG n il!s crc:
reputation, profession and biHll,esa, and no OIL
20 " Thought, suspected md believed thai tlu s
~, ,o,,..1 TIE stoEr 1I1t1rnArE ATTORNEY
Sha conna9or It lay an aoicor aud counsellor IN
SAeery nt tue Uhicago Bar aud had caused It to 10
believed t!iat 10 had conicscd himself ignorant1y
s't s 1,ief1y IN . o Of tt divorce
n III i; s protss:o te oiiowina @ aiss' fis'sene sean
aa!ona 11I ard d tdletIaatory be sosng it forth:
ksad, through tho oat iiterao practitioner 4. tho
Chicago nar [mcaptng. tho snil plaintnl, died iii
being tho statement TINT tho rnintiG, through tlle
inost mo iterao ns1eonor at Tho chicago Dar lnca,l-
ahG tho rlaintia1 had filed Il bill.
4Acfo Ia no HGHAtfQu II
eaon e'Ssed sf hsflqs 3 nstcf set o TINT there any a
the caso in land, with due professional Ckill and
learing but It n tho Hnp1o allegation that io Ia ho
m0st ,fs,ao member CT pf The Chicago Dar rio
that do not that It Is aetionable Thero must o
hero III Chicago ono who is tho most iterato 1uouler
1f @ ts Chicago Lar, whoever it may bo. There might
pIrfEnENcEs OF OPINION Ar 70 THE 1spty1puAr.
bM 1t Is oyioa TINT there must bo ono who IS moro
1leraso @ thn.l any other meher Of tho CAcago Dar,
net necessarily, actionablo. Ono may DO tho most
terato anu yet roaseaa an adequate degree Of learning
tory mauuer to biz client. TO eay to any particular
r;a1. r;srso 1nGmner Of .ooiey
learned claaa Is n fac simply to any TINT ho is tho
leaas learncd Of hts associates aud fl by no mcans
nconablo as IT accna 10 mo-; sianl therefore ans-
taiu tho demurrer to tho aocond count.
TIE Third COUNT,
commences with tbs similar Inducements, and nlso
With ths Inducements TINT there q tho tImo when,
in tho courts Of sald county, wo were commonly and
porularly called, aud generaly known and designated
como Of them. In violation Of approved
B1o'fss!onn, II isdt dv,s;;.s eaae; sna practice aty
at tey will procre divorces wthont pnbetty s
10 FORTH cpd that they arc osorosly Persons of bud
rerte ard Tad conductn disgraco to hs profession,
to he unworthy, manlaclous, dishonest, mud Of bad
tSnr t1SnS %a 50 regarded " the community hat
essaF 10 beosaS I e poin ioi I'D 1sosS was oe
ct tlese eharacscrs, aud to brng him Into disrcpeln
His professional character aud reputation published
irg m IL his ssi business tie following afsh fsise,
Me- butcher IIow Leshcro,s oitoan Proposed 1T t.
asti ~ Of nlu wifc-1,ily Bu,h lmraning tho said
l,illy {,acanug The plaintiff il divorce shyater :
[moanng divorce slisster aforcsall, and psraps
ao lmsanns M ri r.. s h. said lsS nevss aa ese that
member s ohtsago d. and naSs M vng peis%S BY r,,.
with Djy ncanng tue saia pain.in" It .hon pro
eceaa with III account OF Tho divorce suit.
THERE IL CAUSE ACTION,
In accordance with tho views arpally oxprcsscd in
connection With tho first Of t,eso accounts, have
CO.. soc 70 tue % @ soclasIo that there i f .co
ssates-thnt II IL good both in substance aud in form
.... THE FOURTH COURT
commences with tho i'.suconcut that tho rlanin
mission or tlo grievances duly coInssIonod md r.
lbs enjoyment or the emu,cr1tn and nrots of fhnt
office !: that tho 1cfcntant we'll knowutr fhn n.nns
iEea contr!ying to injuro md wrong tho plaintiff an
cause 1t to DO thought aud suspected aud bcoycd
tiAt ho was tgnoranA, and nj nu1tt and nnrrner
person 10 hold aud enjoy tho said Office Of No.ury Pub
lfc published Of him and a said Office tho fooyin..
scandatot's and defatnatory natter:. "Bly lsunS
fmeaning the said plaintiff s fearfuljy md wonnr.
fully ignorant nun. Billy (mea,ing tho said rlan
ti s divorce shystor, and perhaps hc (neanng tic
Ra!h platntt never Lad case thnt wsH not In tnt
iinc. Anyboly who docent know anything about law.
decency, or honor become n,cnbcr OF tho Chrn.
60 l}ar, and mako living ty running thrnu,,h
diyorccs"is." am Of the opinion lhs. |
this count sos forth caso Of actIon aud that 1t iy
good III substance aud In form,
1IIs FIFTH AND LAST COUNT
commences with tho Inducements TINT the n1nnnr 4.
engaged III tho pursuit Of literature for bn ntrnso
Of eieyalng tie moral aud intellectual utanuari OF au
ciety, mud
Amr11onAr1sa ,7s .ornnr77rs
opprcssonr md wrors, rs wc % Tor ti,s nronotfo
lie lurcas of ostabshn9 % ~ I,sw apvap arf
md inRttv for c,ni,,,nnnts mi ,a.n ~, ~ tty;
Ieen in rnrresnnnienre vii, vnrnn. n @ u At
Tia 11ritoI sstoa ~ vail w.. ", H. H nomail,ets "