, 1874-06-30
THE COURTS.
miscellaneous Nllxincsy Trnnsnctct |
Yesterday,

THE COURTS.
N.fsccllnMooHH Business Trnnonctcl
Yesterday.
Darwin 8. Inghatn filod bill yesterday IN tls
Superior Court against George I. Clino, to sci
aside conveyance OF certain lands on tht
ground OF fraud. 1ugham says Tint In February
laat ho owood Lots to Q in Block of Ing.
ham'h Subdivision Of part Of tho s. ". II OF the
y. ". Il of Soc. %, 10, Is. About that time,
through hls hired man, John Carter, complain
ant becamo acquainted with tho defendant.
Cline represented that ho owned about $4,000
| fence posts, two-tlirds Of which vero
collar, aud tho remainder tamaracl, lying
| then at piue Station. Lake County
| Indiana, which he would trade for oomplainant's s
lind. He then akod Iugl,um to go down and
aoe thon,, but this boing impossible through i'll
health. 1ngla'n sont his hired nau Cartor with
Clino to inspect tue posts, ard SEQ that thoy
wore Of the requisite number, inches through
71S foot long, aud Of the kind specified. Cnrter
and Cline wont to Pine Station whcro tho foruor
waa allowed only 20 minutes to inspoot the posts,
which vera moreover covered with snow, aud
was then hurried awny to the dofon dunt's
house about mile away wlaoro
ho romaiued day. Carter Was aso
promised 800 if tho proposed oxchauge took
piace, aud thus primod, came back and made
such favorable report Tint Ingham concluded
the purchase. There WAS thon MI incuubranca
on tho land Of $1,000, which complainant agreed
to pay, giving nj security his Judgment note for
the amount, secured by aomo Kansas lands. He
has since nscertainot, he claims, that tho posts
were not cedar but pn6, mud, therefore. WORTH
less that, III addition, thoy wore not
Cl!no'H property, but wero DrobnhIv
nj I1u ntTtl M f1,oHfn 1o,1
therefore asks thut the sao may be dcclarod
fraudulent, and that the land may bo rccouyoy-
cd, md TUG Judgment outefed up on The $500
noto set aside.
LIBEL Hu1T.
About eix weeks ngo sallio r. Brent fled a
5amascs At s1oo65. The ID doclarutI,ou lk, 4Assug was
filed last Friday, aud from it 1t is ascertain
sa alleged aS bs III Fepa Fs pn # sas aS M ss ss @
always borne good reputation, and, until tho
con,ulittal of the grievances mentioned ia lor
suit, had never been suspected OF perjury, false
h,w;enring ,;; fol ncatiop, adultery. or insanity.
ago by Mrs: Sallie Il. Caldwell against. II. c,
Caldwell (for divorce). Tie case was referred
to a1r. MaSruder, one Of tue Masters III Cla,,-
eery, to tako , proof, p, and among others, tho do
1ondat, iea1 IT. Loyi Wing Eas witness, After the
sons, as eho charges, in a loud yoco
accused her Of perjury on tho trial of that case,
alleging that she Ind sworn to lie; that ehe
had sworn falsaly TINT she had lied. and sworn
to it, from beginning to end that her evidouco
was pack OF d--n lies, and she know it !; that
sho was crazy, tint a number of her relatives
had been crazy, and that somo were then in q
I.unatlo ABylum, and that sho ought to be tbero
tnat tho plaintiff also charges that, on anolhor
occasion, Wing said !: " Sho IL liar, aud YOU
cunt believe anythiug she says; sho las Bworn
TO lies she le u oad womnn, aud Harry (moaning
Henry G; Oaldwell) married her because lo was
forced TO-; he was Obliged to mary her
because sho waa preguant ho married hor Io-
cause ho bud been too iutimato with her." All
this, tho plaintin claims, was done with malicious
intent; that it il entirely falae, and by reason Of
such wrong she Aas Hustaiuod damagov to tha
amount OF 9lo.0D0.
ANOTHER UNCOMFORTABLE scRApE.
a. q. proMt tlod bill iu the Circuit Court
agntnBt u. II. Lomor and the First National
Bank, to en1oin the sale or collection Of
AyH notes OF tho complainant for the
aggregate amount of eal60. pro,t |
aays TINT III tho curly part Of
tho present year Lomor. who was then engaged
in an apparently prosperous business, reprousnt-
Cd to him TINT he was about to chango Ills bust
ia Government bonds, so'nc Of which he showed
complainant. Influenced by those ropreaenta- |
tioud Prout, at Lomers request, indorsed for |
MN TO tue amount OF 81 lou. and received q |
memorandum from the defendant to the effect |
that tho notes were glyon for Ills accommodate |
ton. and wore discounted at tho First National |
l nank. Complainant denies that the notes woro
discounted by tho bank. but says the bank
hods them as collateral security for Lomer's |
!Mueptealess, tr,l whloh amounts to over 90. QUO.
Ihe bank ms also other coilatorals which 1t is
charged arc sufficient TO cover tho indebtedness,
atd oGght 70 DO tlset exhausted boforo recourse
ID naa 70 hls notes: which were given without