New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1874-05-23

SATURDAY, 23

| NJ. Davis, claiming by deed. is rejected and the
property declared to belong to the succession of
| Elliott that of Mrs. Mary E. Risly, claiming by
will of November 29 1871. is rejected and the will
declared null and void, the court below decided
| Judgment giving Mrs. Virginia c. Burke, claiming,
under will Of May %, 1869, made in Mississippi, the
whole property, amended by dividing the property
| equally between her and Mrs. Letitia c. Elliott,
the surviving widow, and, thus amended, affirmed
appellant.-FrOm Fifth District Court. The prefer
ence of ntervenOr against creditors was properly
isalG%sa' u .ne ot morgsgs nGt % gatrr pe1g a
425; % A., 402 % A. 49, "a A. 73. Article l23 CON
sitution Of Louisiana does net impair the obilga'
tiOn of contract. "a A., 25.
No. 5045. Octave Reggie Vs. Blanchin Giraud,
appellants-FrOm Fourth District Court ga order
and "a sale H., The aG
alienation clause, the judgment is annulled. The
plaintiffs :. remedy is In an hypothecatory action
No 473s Higgins Maurer vs. James E. Wilmer,
appellant.-FrOm Fourth District Court. On the
rendering the balance of rent for that month,
asked annullment of lease and return of notes.
Judgment in his favor and against plaintiffs de-
mand for entire rent affirmed. r. s. 2697.
No. 4al7. n: soye ct al vs.. Widow L. Cormin,
appellant.-From Sixth District Court. Seizure
and SALE Judgment affirmed with ten per cent
No 334s John G. spearing VS. Mary spearng ct
ais, appellants from Sixth District Court. Suit
that the plaintiff never was partner was i'm
properly Overrued, there is no contract out of
"Seh 5aas y eoud Racbsrsau Matiida mccrav
| appeilant.-From Fifth District Court. Seizure
| and sale. Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent
l. No 1875. Henry Wade, appellant, vs.. D. W.
Evans.-From Fourth District Coart. The plaintiff
being party to the act OF donation is estopped
| from disputng the title of defendant. Judgment
affirmed.
No 4962. julius socha vs. Mrs. Louisa Renardo,
appellsnt.-From Fifth District Court. Order of
seizure and sale amended by striking out allow
ance for attorneys fee and affirmed
Ne 484s. Edward Ranquetal vs. Widow Gustave
TOurnade, appellant-From Sixth District Court.
On prOmissOry note. Judgment affirmed.
No. 1924. J. Canteron. ST., VS.. J. n. Canteron,
ment amended by reducing it from $32O2 40 TO
S283l 40
appellant From seventh District Court. PrOms-
| eory note. Judgment affirmed with ten per cent
damages.
appellant.-From Sixth District Court. on ac.
| cepted draft. Judgment affirmed. with ten per
No 488s A. Reichard vs. T. Michinard. appel.
| lant.-FrOm Fifth District Court. Judgment of
| seizure and sale affirmed with ten per cent dam.
No. 46a3 eutodia National Bank vs. Kloppen
burg Maury.-Bill of exchange. 1t was not
proper to admit evidence M Of when no re-
firmeG with ten per cent damages.
BY JUSTICE MORGAN.
| No. 5l82 Job Smith vs. William Durbridge, appel
lant.-FrOm Fifth District Court. An incorporated
company is subject only to the jurisdiction Of the
| ties. AS to gaInishee the rule does Rot hold
| The Judgment on the rule compelling the Crescent
City Live Stock Landing and SlaughterhOuse Com
pany to transfer the shares Of defendant, sold by
| the sheriff to the purchaser, is affirmed
No. 5l44. John Phelps VS.. New Orleans Print
| ing and Publishing Company, appellant.-From
| sixth District Court There is no return showing
| the bond to have been sold, and the judge could
ma Ike no order compelling its delivery. Judgmen,
No $3.50 Society of ST. Louis rs. J. B. Alexis, ap
| pellant.-From Fourth Dist let Court. Judgment
| that the property held by defendant was that OF
| the society affirmed
No. sll9. Joseph Billgery vs. Jacob Schnell and
Martin Joachim, appellant.-From Fifth District
| Court. The sale was not fraudulent one or snu
| lated as far as Joachim was concerned Judgment
| reversed to him.
| pellant.-FrOm Fifth district Court. Seizure and
sale. Judgment affirmed with ten per cent dam
| no. 46l6 Mofiit McEabb. appellants, VS.. O.
| INSTRUMENTATION Fifth District Court. The
| Plea of res judlcata was well founded. Judgment
No. 5lI7 William Collinon vs.. certain piece OF
land, Henry Tabory, appelant.-Defendant pur
chased piece of ground, at a sheriffs sale fol-
| compel him to pay the balance. 1t being only
$500, is nuaPpealable Appeal dismissed
No. i1i4. Henry Smith vs. j. Z. Harris aDpel
liant From Fourth District Court. Judgment
! affirmed with ten per cent damages.
No. 3545 Mrs. NJ. E. Irwin vs.. J. +. Spearlng, ap-
pellant.-Judgment affirmed. with ten per cent
No 1894. Alfred Marchand VS.. Spencer Field ct al.
| appellants.-From Fifth District Court On an ac
| ceptance. Judgment affirmed with ten per cent
No. 4845 Samson Brothers vs.. Mrs. G. Rice ap
| pellant.-From Sixth District Court. Pr0missOry
| note. Judgment affirmed with ten per cent dam
| ages. ~ o., 1890,
lant.-FIom Sixth District Court. Seizure and sale
| Judgment affirmed with ten per cent damages
No. 474l. City OF New Orleans vs.. FRANCOIS La
| croix, sppellant-From Superior District Court
| For reasons of City vs. Burthe ct al. may ISl
| Judgment affirmed -
No 5000. James NJ. Lewis vs. Fairbanks & Gill
man and D. J. Edwards. appellants.-Fr0m SIKH
| District Court. On promissory note. The answe
being general denial. and the note having beef
passed without objection, it was not necessary =
| not apply. Judgment affirmed with ten per cen
| damages.
No 5Ou5. Same VS.. Judgment atfrme
| with ten per cent damages,
Superior District Court.
State ex. rel. J. W. Madden VS.. Charles Clinton
| Authorization for nandamus to have warrant
issued for S46l2 II for nine certificates for stat on
| cry, etc. for House of Representatives, 1874. Rul
nisi ordered returnable the twenty-eishth instant
| George D. Pritchett VS.. Mechanics and Traders
| Insurance Company.-PlaintiH alleges defendan
| has funds IN its possession amounting to 6etH ee
| $4,000 and &23OO, the uot being exactly detel
mined; that it is for policy OF insurance on built
| ings on Oak Grove plantation, destroyed by hrt
| aud prays for q writ OF sequestratlon, Whlch
Issued on bond of $1,000.
superior Criminal Court.
PLEADED Sor GUILTY.
Grand larceny-Hatte Russell. Annie Hall.
| aANpAMUs
State x. rel. Gallats & Robert VS.. Justice Stae
Writ of mandamus made peremptory. The justice
after the expiration of three days to 80 on wit
the examination and to cease whenever the gran
Jury makes report.
| GRAND jerry.
State vs.. George Graver aud Frank Page.-Bu
glaly, etc, and assault with dangerous weapo!
True bill.
State vs.. John Martinez-Mansaughter Nc
guilty, without leaving the jury seats.
State vs.. John Smith.-Grandrareen Guilty.
First District Court.
| PLEADED GUILTY.
! Assault and battery-Charles Scott.
| vEKpICTs.
| Larceny-James Davis alias Alexander Prosps
| alias Diddy White, guilty; John DriscOll, Jam'
| Mac and Frank Lyons, not guilty.
| Assault and batterv-Eugene Washington alli
Gallon, not guilty.
Fourth District Court.
George Washington Hugh McCloskey.-A
ton for damages of $500 under the civil rights b
| Given TO jury.
The wheel of fortune
The wheel of fortune
The wheel of fortune
VIII turn on the thirtieth of May.
Will turn on the thirtieth of May.
Will turn on the thirtieth of May.
$4,000 in prizes.
$4,000 in prizes.
$4,000 in prizes.
$4,000 in prizes.
| VALUABLE IMPROVED REAL ESTATE l
THE SECOND DISTRICT AT AUCTION BY TIL
SHERIFF FF-Particular attention is called
the sales at auction to be made this day
noon at the Merchants and Auctioneer