The New York herald., 1874-07-31

the highest regard for Elizabeth Tilton, and at
the same time insisting that she was woman
Do you think II Mrs. Tlton had confessed criminal
ity TO her, Miss Anthony would have been as ex,
travagant In her praise? 1t don't seem so to me-"
ali certainly does not seem natural"
mo. III tell you. Theodore ran or after free
hull. He told the story TO Mrs. Bullard and Mrs.
Stanton. Just as Mrs. Stanton says. Then after
ward, when was IN New YORK, ne became
ASHAMED OF HIS STORY,
and came around to US and said the whole thing
originated in Susans imagination. Then Mrs.
stant said, No; you told US yourself, Theodore,
and susan denied 1t. Then he owned up. That
much heard myself.n
lyon don't beheve Beecher is guiity2'
mo, SIR It's all filthy piece OF business In
which nave not wanted TO mix. did not want
TO have 10 hung on To the suffrage movement, and
ton with MRS. stanton and these other women
has forced knowledge OF 1t upon me- know
% ss sG ae Se u
every old woman that would circulate 1t. know
this, because Theodore i1ton and his wife have
has retailed MS story right and left"
"But as to Mrs. Stanton's storyfn interjected the
'Oh, yes; must get back to thatn responded
the lady, out OF breath "Wen, to be specific. Su-
san "a Amtnony could hos nave revealed Confession
even Mrs. Stanton. II would have been afro
cious and entirely the contrary to
II such confession was ever made, 1t was locked
in Susan Anthony's breast, and will remain there
I'LL SHc uIcs. NeAI III IL was mdue, sue must nave
lost respect either for her own ideas Of marriage
or Mrs. Tilton's intelligence or purity. She did
mott but, on the contrary, to-day regards all with
the highest esteem. Again, II 1t was made. MISS
Anthony would never have denounced Mrs. Wood.
hull as she mas done time and Ii ne again In this
house. AS said before, either good old Mrs. STAN
ton has been Incorrectly reported or she grossly
misunderstood SUSAN"
do You think Theodore Tlton Ia not truthfnlr'
Eyes, do, and have had many proofs OF IL.
Among other things he once said Isabella Hooker
nrst gave him this story. Well, that was proved
false In this way:-When Mrs. stanton was out
West lecturlng long after Mr.. Tilton said that, and
when Mrs. Woodruff was first printing paragraphs
IN the New York World, she made my house her
HEADQUARTERS. All OF her letters came here, and
she read q good many to me. number were
from Isabella Hooker begging to know what Mrs
Woodruff meant and wanting to know II she had
any reference to brother Henry Isabella knew
nothing of the scandal except what Mrs. stanton
told her. Another thing which makes me believe
this statement OF Mrs. Stantons is not genuine is
the way she Is made 70 talk OF
SAN wILKESON.
Now, sam Wi1kesOn is her brothern-law. She
thinks the world OF him. 1t is not at all IKE her
TO say anything against him l don't beheve she
MORE TESTIMONY.
The Post ana Mat man called upon another lady
one long recognized as leader In journalistic Cir
cles, who had been an intimate OF MISS Anthony
She confirmed the above statements In every par
ticular said Miss Anthony never could have made
such assertions TO Mrs. stanton, and she did MOI
believe Mrs. Stanton had been correctly under
stood. These rscts, taken In connection with tht
not very agreeable reputation OF the BrooKiyI
Ar0Ls the paper claiming TO have Interviewed tht
great sufiragst, will induce many people to be
Oove the report bogus.