The star of Pascagoula. [volume] (Pascagoula, Miss.) 1873-1878, 1874-06-27

JHfiIfa f9Hff W " l9f
fJIar n ~ Bfssu taasabis
Z H.F
aHss o'f h
me- rsHre sIfsw ieag ga OBJ
i.f..lIrf NH a~1'aafdiy 4sfaf
1.-Two 'stftfiaRt fntFf fsH f.s.a
f5f la fbo fff#sf f1m
pltIa fisi neg hiI 90 soiafqlsae.
sustained dtnaRea % tbs fuoufi o
tTsry.fgs do'lam
% vr afisgsd dit nee afei
broke aaig from q nf belonging n
si55'1rsg sgeaf during No isesIsi.
/ fau april. md we're tied W by lb'
I defendant aaf ibo eilo evelffI a
god do1 o. ihtarcf as 10 sls cop.
ptscI d1' iba question II fts light
10 uc ap TIMER SOW iogs &C. found
airil a1s htfere6o 90 dam COM
p.and6n l%1caoralIy di16Ifcj 10 Che
community bg iho tern slIyagcO
sosld 30 dororetiy ventilated sni
mlly decided
On saturday tic case stated cane
NJ with the following persons e5o7d
mting tho jury yiz: Mcssrs Van.
Wafcaen, John Delm1a, g. II TAomp
s50, higbtoger. Pickett and W. r.
Nix.
The Court waited ton9tim1 be-.
fore proceeding to trial for the lead.
ing counsel for PLAINTIFF, WHO had
been detained and it was not until
the examination Of the witnesses lad
been completed snd the arguments
had been entered UPON, that he made
appearance
Some six Witnesses were examined
and it was shown hal Mr.. Trudcn
had gone on. il a boat in quite o
sea and had brought the sticks
10 tic shore and tied them TIP. 1t
seemed to be q question dividing
whether the timber would
nave come to the shore anyhow or
whether they would have gone 10 sea
however this was not material to
he case. g. II. Wood Esq. led off
n the opening argument and review
ID the facts and the testimony. He
vas followed by Mr.. Trudell who
vas managing his own case. We
re obliviohS to the fact whether Mr..
knows, or not, how to "run
hotel, as we can't speak "by the
ard, but We imagine a very good
was spoiled ti!cn lie ttrned
.ot6i keeper, for he certainly manag-
d His case with great tact and address.
fe Vas followed by Geo. Wood Esq.
Tht closed the argument. Mr..
Wood afte, disposing of the matter
f "Saltagc"-which does not apper-
ain i'll the slightest degree to such
r any similar cases, and although,
7hich had been much talked Of pres
was not preached by tie de-
cited authorities 10 show
hat however much parties Who re,
overed logs, timber &c. were entitled
/, Compensation f5r services, and
owevcr just were the demands; de-
ending Upon the amount Of risk and
rendered, still such fervites
mounted to no lien upon the proper.
recovered and gate them nc
'ght to hold such property until
leir demands were complied with.
lie lawful owners had at all times d
gllt to claim and become POSSE ssed
their property. Mr.. Wood refer
to the fact that an erroneous
Union in the mltter prcvadcs to a
eat extent the community ; lie {
ted the instance, where, during the
me freshet, a ~loggctter from Way
,sboro came down with his logs S
ID lost one raft which lodged against
i railroad bridge, and which was
I'd there, or to the bank, by a per
n, who refused to give up the raft a
the owner until he paid him the il
N Of seventy-fve dollars. A nest v
vigorous custom. certainly, would II
is be to establish, and common sense b
1hld undoubtedly side with Mr., v
GODS Authorities, or else no ones y
property would be safe p
III the finders AMI savers who
onld spring Up en- all sides.
Tie defendant maintained that no
dCf had been produced before the =
establishing the right Of owner 4"
ip. no proof IF demand and q re- c,
ral Al ~ - - A.