The Valley Virginian. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1865-1895, 1874-11-26

HUSTING9 COURT.-The following is a sum-
mary of the proceedings OF this Court since
orr last issue:
George Basel qualified to practice law in
this Court.
A new eammissiQn was awarded in the case
OF Valley Railroad against J. I. Parent.
The cases Of Valley Railroad against SanI
HoushoqF, r. II. Trout andJ. c. Marquis, were
laid over until next term.
Sarah Richardson qualified as administrators
Of the estate Of ]. II. Richardson, decd.
W. +: Craig qualified to practice law in this
Court,
Chas: Turner rendered his designation as
eommissionerr Of accounts, and W. E. Craig
was appointed ~ his steaI
SUPREME Counr OF .AprEALs.-The fol-
lowing is u summary of the proceedings Of this
Court since our last issue:
WEDNESDAY.
Robert Whitehead, Esq. Of Nelson qualified
to practice in this Court. The following eases
were continued:
prain ys. Picker, no Counsel present;
neFer Us, Jordan ct al; Meade VS.. Griyby's
admir-, by consent: Kneller BY &c, VS.. Coal
man. on motion OF Appellants; Fisher & Bro.
no Counsel present Lam It IL .. Bauyher,.
admir-: Sine vs.. Earman ct al.
Ashby's admir- W. Porter ct Ill was subnaittea
by Appellants Counsel OH printed notes.
Rac's asl,n'x VS.. Trotter 81 Beoe:, wass1ully
hsafa hlla time taken to consider.
A. J. Gary account against the Commons
wealth amounting To s76i 80. for printing re-.
cords at Richmond, vas allowed.
Edward Brown fcai.j xsss allowed ago for at
tendance upon Law library n Richmond for
two months.
r,,,n. L
Lam u II vs.: bauSnera adtn I: oracr OF con-
un1allce sst ISSUE ana case submitted on notes
u Doausei.
The following eases were continued
Deysses & Co. VS.. Johnston e. Wolfe ct al.
Massey Is. Kinr ct al: Russell Is. Randol,,l,
l5eirhe vs.. Rnssjsf & Tnrner Evans vs.. Petty.
John Muiidyss SR1'sr W.. Peters. Sury.. Sc:
Pieasarts vs.. Wualrl,fF It a.
: Enlfz VS.. Davis. 20. from Nelson County
submitted upon printed notes. :
Youae & wife vs.. Cabcll,s Ex,or ct al from
Nelson. lIhn record heinz tlefrctiy. cer,io-
rari was awarded and case continn.d 49, -
f,otfnon 4 Rrufr,. - Al ~ Mliar L. ~
from k0Ck iN{pflan. GyyApflnd n ryNS ct
Apnell,nts r. nav cost ~ ,,r;ntinr s''''
Many Va sellers from Ro.I;n,r,on 40,
continued "'
1,,e or,,..rs Of rr,,.,,1.,, ,,.ro .;,,,oa ~,
,,,rht ard 10 - .;-'',..a, va
,I'le ;n,l,,as III iff m E:d,y ,,,orn;,,,s tn.;,
for Richmond. o
-.
oh thursday the following decisions were
rendered:
T, k.,,.v ". T,r,r,, d.,,;,;s.u.a
,-'..i 49,. 60. Ae'. ~ y"
a,pp;s;,, y. 49, " ~'e
f,.,..a uo,on -, Nv was u. IT,.
1,,a's. - nn..ia:a. .io opi.iol ,r, ~ o.'i
-. ,'',, .,s. Ing ma
!olty " .'i1 Eou'. nei'i thlt tntle was part
anu .'". !. c'lne pIope,'S "i.h'li Tue
VI S.l'c.iy oou..' eouu'-
~ =. pn.s s.c'ens ~ eos..''Ic
a..'om ...o p'oa.s Ions rs VI
w, 'I..'t:. ~. sn.Js nc SCI
W. ~, wa ""e.s. = psouucta
~ .llc u..en .' WAS appncaple: W a.no.nls
Sial. 4 Wy 20. pla'. on cs "a ~. a.oln
lsy', ~ als,I'' looo W ',f. Me!
'ny. AnG MAJORITY VI ''e Iot. =. ne'u .u''t !. 1
,''ast ee lAAcli ior sl'np! h!' ',ess es,'aes
..l" n.e. naae' anu y ~: y asss"sa wen
INC W s'n .;..s ~ ~. . NV ,',
,' uoiie rs. my i'',ni .''", '''e . va "
pi R',d .s. .St' t ."' i; '.ns
~, .i,,,,, 81 +h, ,,,a;,,,;.r = - III ~.
~, s,,a'.;n,, ~. FL. ......+5 III h...,.
,,l,. and fh.t tI,.r'.f,r. ~. Go,,rt erred in ~.
!; ,;,,r - h,i,.,.. ~ .,,,,.t
49, = - iln,;, ~. 1a;ntg ~ ,,ro,,., III 49,.
r. hill Nv cn,'rsa,,,,,,.' r,t,,, f.,, ~,
C;r.;,;t Co,rt 81 Roc,shr,r. f,,l,,n A,,',.,.s',n
l.i;,,.,.,; W.. ",,;on ~ liz G.rt IN tl,;s
., !. ti,er,. Ind KUN av,r,l..i 81 ss. ar of
f,I,,nc.rv on v, tI,.. vp,,l;,t n:,s HI. III. liz.
f.nl,nt5 aud III. ,.l,a,c.l1nr srt asi.l ire yrr-
lict and awar.!,d new trial 4 succer,,inr
1T Ill. ti.t order and ;, tIr,, o,
,l,.cr,.e,l IN fs,or ~ tj,e ,I.f,,,l,nt ~ Il th
verdict had ,,,svrr hen act ,.i,l. thr Cont
held tl,.t ti,r i;r.f c.nc.llor had the n,yr 10
s,t asi,l. the verdict OF the i,,rv and award a
new trial. and that the Vireinia Code did NOT
take from him this power. although he was tle
s,me .T,,doc h.fnr,. whom, the issue ont Of
Chancery had been tried and further held
th,t r Va. ,nt cnn,n.tonf ~, snccer,linr
chanc.llor, without snti,c;er, reason anncari,,S
on the record 70 set aside Nh. acfion Of The
previous chancellor and decree. uuon the YER
el,ot ,r,,n l.n;,;a,, ~ th lo,s. TT.n,.t M, ~,
v,.r.,.l Nth .,sts mi IN. o.';sa r.,',.,,tinI
In R,rn,,tt aud VII. ~ Ti.,v,.,. ..xccutor
from thn circuit Court of Au,,,,If, tlnd,. 81
niles delivered the oninion nf tln Court. In
w. ,..a1. ",,., mics rostr;,.fsd Nv nvnrass
terms. or by necessary Implication in tile in
strumcrt creating such estate. may dispose IF
1t absolutely II personal property, or OF tue
;,r + tor hr,,sf ~ .o'. u'. ant,r
though that other be her husband, and may
even give it to him, provided no undue infill-