, 1874-07-27
TiLTON'S CROSS.


| unsATiHrAcronx.
ns 81" onee ~ sre not hssshiy @Shfy< 81. .nba,
cat:y TINT Mr. 13ecehora cxpMnatinn lansastactory
VIZ s sSss F.. 's p'on.sd ss " e dS s* d L
must "ster down md out."
nr@cuEa'a FUTURE EXPLANATION.
| - Ffon, tie RytArHrr De,Aotr Il,
It must he understood that tho statement act fortt
" M nsssr w2 VII grs.
wor!. trust lis future explanation Viii 10 eiar .nure
,.,An FIRM r. nhetliny jnltH19tnctr. :
the Intercourse lotwcen Mrs. Tlton and air neechcr
q! thla mts.l'le. standing could not hasc arisen liz
and nj. Tllton ard his wifo wad norer iayo ueetic
e Ta'l oM. and make up. anl then finally foparate.
/ ncnt f'~~''s
THE sEw 1onx pAn71eAs1sm.
There = ayiea ia 1a sntia', L s,s;,:d y
@ se ses ssss"s VII as T. sa G
1rom tue points Ut iasc In tic Dec, her question 10 Mr,
t n ry,nou IL s a1socabtngy brsy 1oussa Toa %
soa tss tfsa ssn aS Ys, n,eE , # sen
,; s ss s; { s Ssi Sc ssens
ease taas against him he atn1,a' condemned Il vii
not help hn to say that Mt. Ttnu ia Of u ppouliar
tNAt III HlHul HD oHD II lin
must nhow That lin documents, confeseIous. md
neaaihe nre forEercs or wers written with IN aso.
e, .PoselnLE 1MrHuDENcEs. Il
Thcto ave ixsm es ,s ossiSo 1dfsus ,or
fan,il!ca but nov thoy only sccm lmnrmdnnt
w9n .oa , in TIC coa gt Il rllo
oaso becauce they ellaarate frenl monotnsniac.
AAzIous 70 hEEp coHoxALrp.
narey posaio II tt st'EiiSs9s isiso . esss TIM.
Mesars Dcgs'er and Tison TINT each for i,naelf il
H. yory re'sonahlo IN slow ef Tho WILDLY d1foront
ero'a.qs esrd put m Hno tho different matters q
were in court of INV, oy would be requttsd 10 Se
little moro tenntto in their Rtatomona of evidence.
batne deto character of tho evidence submitted. we
urp al h lues TO fully understand.
BELIEVE THEM Gu1LTY.
No hnye examined will earo tic sntcnes1ta Of the
man and wouan implicated aud tho evidence brought
% the trout. And from tlis standpoint we brljoTo
thsm guilty. No staten,out which Tho. nov. Henry
Ward echcr may hereafter lnkc lowevor carefully
coso' can otract from tho weight Of tho confession
humble nyRoif before Theodore Tllton m would
boforo aoa. could even wish that were deadn
HITTER DlsAprotaTMENT.
tho Joia has . snressSd itso. war1v IN rooar
T4lton, II was With feelinx Of bitter disappointment
because they foil short Of furnishing tie complete vim.
THE codMIrrEEs VERDICT OF NO CONSEQUENCE.
will not nse4 ns r Il e. sas *4s 1se9s, 9yss: o Cam
ntttee 1nay render in this Distressing cssc fur It hus
aono beyond the COMMITTEE Of Plymouth Church 10
nov at tho bar Of public opiuion. It thereforo be-
him 10 uake hlu innoconco absolutely eoar-so
clcar that MI tho world may roo and know 1t.
MoRx LIGHT WANTED.
is s f ts1 e e sSpssssn Hsfss of Mr.
statements produced by TiItun and feel that tho
denial is sufficient to ita PURPOSE. Tho public now
n&co utter Icnao oia;o THY require moro iaub
bs explanation than Inns yet boon gvcu. Mes. TiItons
Sea a M. m9rs I'd Maa%ags to Ton than good 70
socnany and got thoy leave the documentary oydonco
III % st r. at
Is yet brought forward. md the plnc absolutely
inands tho testimony Of Frank Monton,' o: Oliver
9aP Il I'll hssps osa payy ata % a Has ses
TIE :,n rAn11saNslaIH ~ e. ri. TIE ooMsrrnx =
It is nrscred, and denied that mr. Titol. has do
e!lncd 10 place original documents n tho hands Of Mr.
bcccl.ers COMMITTEES What tic fact may be- wo aont
really aaylng the things which put iu their mouths
by frlcudly Now York reporters, common prudence
retailing auc spers rs o nny Josiro to % n1
sa own rosscsso. The yfocit partisanslip Of tncsa
reported utcrances ia simply Indecent aud viii CO far.
oyer moral weight tho contttea'a Conclusions might
otherwiaa have hal with tho public. =.
EOSFkstl.o Hl8 QUILT
Tie subject p pa T. d z IL sss*di ss d:ares we ,oave
intriguing lawyera ot Mr. .Becehor, hy appointing
slnn,, aud 80 de,nonssrating ha unwi'lingnssa 10
IT, fsat Ills % y ts H. M ot m ot
again. and added Tue last circumstance to Tho yul-
nerablc array Of tho danng evidences Of his crilnc.
asiss Ct lis ceraasion - a' 'n' ouA' 'no
rnErEn 70 nE1tEvE pErouEn. =,
Tho question now ia reduced to ono Of yaracity be-
twean these two persona (1oecher and r!lton]. We
ees o Verify sps
IS: noesher says ho can explain them Iha lsttorsl
do ao Uail ho fills to do this We aIall continue to
bolisva linn innocent.
wonsr 7uAs roInx.
From tbs III crD,sc Republican.
Tilton mazcs out rima facie case md It Is
bl!ns at.snng viii it. rio cass must W be nao mot
fairly and sluarey.
- PARTIAL EXPLANATIONS.
Let ua at It It, eta neeecr a111 vii ct giro out any
more partial replies and explanations, an that, when
snoush Of aIstanca aud pfobab,iity to JUSTLY der.
4 rnoor or GUILT.
From fhe st. I.u& Nt.putfA.
Mrs. Tllton'a denlal ia n,lworthy Of nobtc pure
yerted al morbid Mind rather tlan tho smple do
4lencs Ut Innocence. It bears tho impress Of prepa
ratlon as touched With tho sinful love that bud a
her husband rather than defense of horset and her
guilty lsrAmour.. :: Mra. Tilton's denial is .
proof Of Euilt Tstacr than plea Of innocence,
WEAK.
peechcrs spa 9 ~ Il u, ssi 1ss Is % s;a Iovovpr uuoh
from n weak man. II IA more than weak cominy
from Decclcr. Any moro such weak detiala, So
ier Ton rahes haa aq aega 1fSd a. Snaeaon y
Bsscher.
wo:,sr DO now.
from The l}Hr}fnJfou {{t,3 Gazette,