The Democratic press. [volume] (Ravenna, O. [Ohio]) 1868-1901, 1874-06-04
COURT OF CoMMoN PLEAS.

I Edward Howells Admir-. VS. The
Atwater Coal Company. Settled al
Defendants eosts.-Ranney & Hatfield
for pIff.
Sarah j. Davenport VS. George S.
4 Davenport. Dismissed by plaintiff
and at her costs-E. W. Maxson for
I petitioner.
Mary Davis VS. Thomas Davis.
Dismissed without prejudice at plain
tiifss COSTA. Jackson for petitioner.
i-Hutehins 81 Thomas for deft.
Samuel Z. Taylor VS. K. e. Payne
ct al Guards. Dismissed at PLAINTIFF s
costs.-1. III. Phelps for plff
Mary, A. Green VS. Moses Bean. This
was on trial when our paper went to
press last week. The jury returned a
verdict fer plaintiff for 500 damages.
Leave given plaintiff to amend her PEI
tition. which was done. Defendant
then filed his motion asking the court
10 compel the plaintiff to separately
state aud number her causes of action,
which motion was oyerruled, and the
cause came on for hearing on defend
ants motion for new trial which was
ouerruled, and judgment was render
ed by the court upon the verdict. To
all of which rulings of the court de-
iendant excerpts, aud demands second
trial which was allowed on his giving
bonds in $500. -J. A. Nichols & Hart
for plff.,-Panney 81 Hatfield and E.
Il. Taylor for deft.
Joseph III. Featherby ct al VS. Sabra
Featherby ct al. Decree for partition
&C. A. Reed for petitioners.
w. M. Hoyt 81 Co VS. Henry Peck
ct all. Settled-Taylor & Horton for
Plifs.
X. 3. Payne Guard'n, VS. Winfield
S. Holcomb. Settled, each party to
pay his own costs Taylor 81 Horton
for plaintiff. II. Phelps for deft.
Charles L. Curtiss VS. Robert w.
King. Judgment for plaintiff for $5.
Plaintiff demands second trial. Allow
ed on giving bail in Sl00.-M. Stuart
for plf. Hart 81 Reed for deft.
John Dellon VS. Asahel E. Goodrich.
Judgment tor plaintiff for SHOOT and
costs.-Hutchins & Tuttle for plff.-
NJ. Stuart for deft.
George Wisman VS. Frederick Heck
man. The court find that the road In
dispute is regularly laid out and es-
tablished township road and that the
defendant has obstructed the same as
alleged in plaintiffs petition and or
der the obstruction removed and en-
JOIN defendant from further infer
fering with the same. Defendant
decreed to pay 81 damages and costs.
Defendant demands an appeal which
is disalIowed. He then demands
second trial. allowed on giving $500
bail-Taylor s. Horton for plff.-M.
Stuart for deft.
A nh 9 T.
Rhodes. Suit brought to recover for
ant of and concerning the plaintiff. |
Tried to Jury, who find for plaintiff
and assess his damages at $160. Judg-
ment accordingly. Defendant demans
second trial which is allowed upon
his giving bail in the sum of S32O--l
J. IL. Nichols for plaintiff.-Hart Il /
Reed for deft.
Betsev. White VS. Lucuis o. Eldridge. |
Judgment for plaintiff for $477.26 and |
costs. By consent execution stayed |
ill after August 4, 1974.-A. jackson
for plf.
James France vs. Milton Moore eft al
Motion to confirm Sheriff7s SALE Sale
set aside upon defendant Moore's pay
n9 the amounts of the decree forth
y ASL, lA1O OOSlo vi lA1AS nlObAOug buO
,osts of the original suit and increase
,osts so far as he is liable for the same,
md also pay D. L. Rockwell 500 for
lis expenses and trouble hereia-D.
:. Rockwell & E. B. Taylor for plff.--
VI. Stuart for deft.
Anna E Goucher VS. John UToucher.
Petition for Alimony. Tried to court.
Petition dismissed-Taylor & Horton
or petitioner-R Ranney 81 Hatfield fors
defendant.
In several cases decided by the
Jouff the entaies had not been fur
ished the Clerk at the time we make
p our summary.
Court met on Monday morning and
here being no further business for
he jury they were discharged and
}ourt adjourned over to Friday NOR
ing. Judge Conant going to War
en- to hold court there.