New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1874-05-10
WILLIAM P. KELLOGG.
COURT RECORD.
SATURDAY, MAY 9. 1874. 3.
United states Supreme Court.

United states Supreme Court.
The following cases were decided ON the fourth
Instant
No. 244. The United States plaintiffs in error, vs.
Thomas Allen Clarke. executor, etc. No. Dol
Charles NJ Conrad, plaintiff IN error. vs.. The
United States No; S3. The United States. plain
tiff, in error vs. Charles NJ. Conrad, claimant; No.
255. The United States, plaintiffs in error. vs.
Franc 8 II. Hatch, claimant. In error to the Cir.
Louisiana. Mr.. Justice Strong delivered the opin-
ion of the court reversing the Judgment OF said
Circuit Court, and remanding the causes with di.
Court .ssen,ing, Mr. Justice Clifford Mr.. Justice
Davis and Mr.. Justice Field.
No. 23e. The Citizens Bank Of Louisiana, appel.
liant, va. the United States; No 24O The Merchants
States ct al; No. 2al 1.-THE Citizens Bank of Louisi
242. The Merchants Bank of New Orleans, plain
tiff in error, VS.: the United States ct al: No. 243
s a II 1af IN
ror, VS.. the United States.-Appesls from and in
error to the Circuit Court Of the United States for
the District of Louisiana Mr. Justice Strong de-
livered the opinion of the court, affirming the de-
crees and judgments Of the said Circuit Court in
these causes. Dissenting, Mr. Justice Clifford, Mr.
Justice Davis and Mr.. Justice Field.
No. 1893. Armand and Michael Heine. appellants,
vs.. Board of Levee Commissioners, parishes Of
Court of the United States for the District of Lou
isiana. MIR. Justice Miller delivered the opinion Of
the court affirming the decree of the said Circuit
Court in this cause, with costs. Dissenting, Nj.
Justice Clifford and Mr. Justice Swayne.
Nos. 2s9 and 267 to 279, inclusive. 8. A. Stock
dale collector, ETC.. plaintiff IN error Vs. various
Court of the United States for the District Of Lou
isiana. Mr.. Justice Miller delivered the opinion of
cult Court, with costs, and remanding the causes,
with directions to enter decree in favor OF Stock
dale agreed iatement OF facts in the case Dis
senting, Justices Davis, Field and Strong.
Superior District Court.
The following petition wa. filed:
No. DnA;k
alleges the purchase Of nine bonds Of the city of
1000 each, dated May l, 1854 and endorsed by the
New Orleans, jackson and Great No' thern Rail-
road; that they are portion of q series of six per
cent bonds issued under oct No. lo9, approved
March 10. 1854, aud according to ordinance of the
city of New Orleans authorizing subscription to
capital stock of the railroad; that they were due
May 4. 1874. and were presented, payment de.
manded and refused, and the bonds protested and
prays judgment against the city for $4,000 aud $27
the costs of protest.
The court issued the following order: State Of
Louisiana VS.. L. Damele.-On motion OF defend
ants-A 4 W. VOORHEES, of counsel suggesting
that he does not keep cOffeehOuse, but . strictly
retail grocery. and that writs of injunction have
with the carrying on Of his legitimate business Of
retail grocery; that defendant has paid his license
retail grocer that this matter has slfsady been
is ordered that the plaintiff show cause on
Thursday, the fourteenth Nav. 1874 why said writ
Superior Criminal Court.
INPORMATIONS FILLED.
Breaking and entering, etc.-Jues Belford.
RObbery-Martin r. Lang
Carrying concealed weapon-Golden Robe rtson
ARRAiGNED.
Jules Beugnot, burglary and larceny; plea of moi
guilty.
VERDICT.
State va. John Harper and Peter Luin. Bur
glary and larceny; both guilty of both charges.
ON TRIAL.
A EoJoa
ment.
Second District Court.
SUGGESTIONS of Paul Desbon, Mrs. v. A. Gour
saud and Christian &. Milberg opened.
The minor Goursaud prays 10 be emanc lpated.
Fourth District Court.
Peter Jobeph vs. David Bidwell-The jury be ing
unable to agree. a mistrial was entered. Defe nd
andt moved to impanel another jury and cOntin ne
l. and the motion was resisted by the plain tiff
Case, with others Of like character continue te
Monday.