New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1873-11-04

| MOVEMENT.
PARIS, Monday, Nov. 8, 1873
| The Budget of the Minister of Finances is nearly
ready for presentation to tho Assembly. The estl-
mates for the War Department are heavy ana NJ
Mane win ask for the temporary imposition Oh he"
| taxes.
| President MacsIahon to-day received Delegations
from all the sections Of the Right.
Is is believed that after the prolongatlon OF tne
Presidents powers hes been voted the Ministry WI"
be reconstructed and series OF strongly conserVa-
tive measures will be introduced into tho Assembly,
The Deputies of the entire Left have agreed 10
question the Government on its participation IN ne
| intrigues of the monarchIcal coalition.
Ii is said that the Count de Chambord has re-
ceived Congralulatory letter from the Pope
BERLIN. Monday, Nov. D. DID
The prevailing feeling here is enc of satisfaction
| at the course adopted by the Count dc Chanboid'
vIcIssrUDrs or TIE MoNARcHICAL CAUSE.-THE
REroEgED CONCESSIONS OF TIE COUNT De
CIIAMBoRD-BEpOET OF THE DEPUTA1ioN SENT
10 HIM or THEIR CONFERENCE.
lFEoM THE REGULAR CORRESPONDENT OF The TRiBUNh''
PARIS Oct. 2O.-When / last wrote, "Wednesday
the 10th the royalist causc seemed at lower cpp
than AZ any time since the 5th Of August. Such pof-
ton of the country rs unwillingiy consnlted On
the previous Sunday, had emphaticaly pronouhced
against il the Count dc ChambOrd seemed OF oDS'i
nate purpose 10 remain gentleman Of ms "oro anu
honor. But on Thursday Fusion stock went up at
bound and has been rising ever since; accomp2heu'
which is noteworthy, with parallel rise ~ the pun
lie finds at the Bourse InSthe early afternoon Of
that day accredited spread that the best ah-
thorized delegates Of the Fusionist deputies sent
last had brought back from their interview WIN
the Count 10 Cha1Dbord at Salzburg such conces-
sons of the Pretender would satisfy the require
mens Of the CX-OTleanist, constitutional mon'uchsS
of the Right Center. These concessions whatever
they we're are or are TO be, were first submitted To
the permanent Fusionst committee Of nine Royalist
deputies known az the Committee of Studies Tins
Committee next day submitted its report to meet
ing composed Of the officers Of the various monarchl
cal groups there are four Of them of the Assembly
along with certain propositions which were un'shI-
mously adopted by the meeting The meeting
furthermore ordered the publication, not OF Tue
propositions themselves. but Of this characters
tically conditional summary formula: " In accord
ance with these propositions the monarchy IS 10 DE
rctstabshcd; all the civil, political ana rellgous
liberties that constitute the public law OF France are
guaranteed ;ithe tri-cOOred flag is 10 ne maintained
and notifications of it cannot be made the Royal
initiative, however, remaining intact. except by
agreement between the King and tho national rep
resentatiyes."
You Will not fail 70 observe in this curious pro-
eramme the deGnitiyoneSs of the first clause estaD-
fishing monarchy; the vagueness of the second,
open to all sorts OF practical interpretation prois-
inc M much and securing as little to the people az
that frat article Of the late Imperial Constitution,
which recognizes, confirms and guarantees the
great principles proclaimed in 1885, and that arc the
base of tho public rights of the French;" and the
insertion, Internationally as it and if unm-
portant in the third cadse, Of the Royal Initiative
reserved intact" Whatever is for the monarch is
clear and positive; whatever is conceded is vague
and oualifcd II would be little astonishing, II
we were not beyond being astOnished IN France,
that after now nearly three nDlths OF active ln-
trguug at home and Of negotiation with the foreign
Pretendcr Constitutional and Legitimist Mon
archsts are only able TO unite at last
in presenting such a programme as this
on the very eve Of a parliamentary performance
whose result IS to fix for time) the destnies OF
their country. BY COnstitutonalists and Legii-
mists | mean here the Deputies of either kind IN
the Assembly. The old and ex.partisans Of the
elder and younger Bourbon branch respectively out
of the ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS respective organs in the
press for cxample-are not quite united they
are already very divergent in the Interpretation OF
this only two days old final, indefinite, conditional
ceeding gladness over Chambords patriotic prefer
ence Of throne and the interests of France TO his
principles as prince and his honor as gentleman,
IeeitIaists Of the blue blood somewhat Indignantly
repudiate their pretense that he has yielded any
thing of his Divine Right aud Royal
InitiatiyeD Such reputation, without di-
! rectly repudiating the vague programme,
| is forcibly expressed at length IN the
| leading article of yesterdays Union, the lead
ing journal of the pure LegitimIsts. The
programme, to be read on the first column
of the Unirers of yesterday, the remarkably
able leading Legtimst journal, is prefaced
Witha significant editorial note, " We are begged to
publish the following without comment" The two
journals owned by The Orleans family and the one
that has par excellence. the reputation of being the
organ of this strange government H. c., the Duke de
Broge) whose speciality is to conspire against IL
self 40 in accord with the shrewder Eusonist depu
ties of the Right Center advise Prudence and keep
to generalities and commend forgiving and forget
ting and deprecate foreseeing What presses is to
get our monarchy, which we all want; each shall
make what we best can for our respective selves
aud Of the unhappy king, when we get hun.
Outside of the circles within circles wherein in
triguing deputies move and Of newspaper columns
that have to be set up with M eye, If not TO
symmetry yet TO the uprightness of the composite
royal house there is freer talk, which it runs,
touches or presses curious fact in respect Of the
Count de Cbambord's much discussed pretended
concessions. Not of any sort whatever, bearing
on the flag or notwithstanding OF legally guar
anteed rights of the French people, is definite is
authorized by his signature. Yet he is not chary
of his signature. Beside his great manifesto of last
year. aud his confrmatory letter TO Bishop Dupan-
loup and one two other writings of his published
by him or with his consent which he
serts the fnlIness of his ROYAL right as a