New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1873-11-24

cid purchase about $4,000 shares Of such stock at about
ns price last aforesaid that the stock thus purchased
iendsats, Alden and Robinson respectively. upon the
false Pretense that It was their stock which they
as the plaintiffs Informed and believe. the stock
winch Alden and Robinson thus sold and delivered to
kobnson or either Of them but the stock OF the de-
i s Drew and was furnished by hun % the saia
TO the plaintiffs fudment OF their said purchase a.
contraos from and with the said Alden and RobinsCn
respectively at the prizes aforesaid, and 10 enable the
defendant Drew to get rid OF his stock herenbeoro
aese NJ prices beyond It's real value aud III further
apee Oh the conspiracy aforesaid
Seoehhy; That by OF Tho false and fraudulent
con,HYances articles pretenses, and practices aore-
rom 'he defendants and other persons about isece
% o the stock OF said Company and paid therefor
than the real value OF said stock and the plaintiffs are
H s ana believe that about 1000 shares OF he
the Drew % 30 had and c cW s4s ak
nelenDeIore stated, and that by means or said false
practced by the defendants respectively, as herein
ooa S the said defendant Drew was enabled TO
anu ug sell or cause 10 be sold and delivered 10 the
the said 1900 shares OF stock at prices beyond
L'ghhg; And the plaintiffs alege. on information
lhat the several petenses representations
and arices herenbefore alleged have been False aud
such to Defendants respectlyeiy at the time they
"eie hade and were made and resored to BY the de
plaintiffs purchase the stock OF said Company which,
IN lael belonged to the defendant Drew aud to enable
s real value, and for the purpose OF cheating
and detraudng the plaintiffs.
nnhly' That the stock OF said Company did not at
any e after November, 1872, increase Ia ITS market
price or value that the not, at any time since
TINS paid therefor sos to s06 per share which
iacl was well known 10 the defendants respectively
thd INSTEAD Of increasing in its market vaGe the said
SIOUX became ana was worth much less in the market
thah te prices above named that about Sept H.
loi3 the plaintiffs owned or the stock which they
purchased "a hereinbefOre stated about 1900 shares
when at that date had cost them, IT the prices last
above stated about tl,65555s which they have sls
talneu loss To the amount of about 100000.
Ithy That during all the times aud dates Aforesaid
inc panlins were wholly ignorant OF the real condition
ana AFFAIRS OF the said Company aud of the real value OF
inc STOCK thereof that they were Ignorant OF the fact
that the defendants had made and entered into the un
Lawful conspiracy herelnbefore alleged and were gno
rant OF the TACT tna the several pretenses statements
representations arnces and practices herein alleged to
spectyely were false or that they were fraudently
made; and they Ignorant OF the fact that In making
the purchases OF said stock herenbefore stated that
they were purchasing the stock Of the defendant Drew
ana the plaintiffs that they relied upon the said
several false and fraudulent practices, arces state
nens, aud representations hereinbetore alleged, beev
ing them to Oe true aud only because thereof did they
become purchasers OF the stock OF said Company, as
herenbefOre stated
Wherefore, the plaintiffs demand Judgment against
these defendants for the OF $00O000 damages be-
cause oil the premises herenbeofe alleged, together
WIN interest thereon with the costs OF this action.
FULLERTON KNOX CROSBY.
Attorneys for plaintiffs, No 1870 Broadway.