, 1873-01-27

reached when tho Court adjourned. lDear in mind That
eho received 500 from Mr.. nou!ol, Of tho Atowart
wch ia G ii e evioneo. i S Dear ii mind T What sssed
bcforo ADJOURNMENT that when hhe finally received
% M Sssss sss s ssss la az 10 e. Sspy %
toned as 10 thc relief shc Ind received On tho 9th
Bho roreaol wllnt Ao Htatc whc Bho iirst nade tho
application tic 27tn Of November, That aho Ind o,ly
estoye sa fon9 bgn New hs ,s" wH1 tho o9 OH ,sa ths
your nttcnon before tho adjournment, Rlo Ind nj.
nliol Tho 4 Of December, fyo days before aho pot
mattrcaaes from, Wia,ns' department: " Doc. \, Mira
William II. Tucker, Iorcll street"
On Tho 7tf, ehe lind got tbeBn Hats Of artfces Hraed
hcr last which eo adnits sho received. hui tho
ef aransea cr @ M Srsr for s @ onK
q On s M q e ns 1e o Gs
oG sae s PEN =, ep M 9 son
speaks of, consisting Of wraprero, waierproofs and
Ind stss reeevea itH Ills Ser donation from he % city rce
Ct Golicr'a church; ahe Ind Just been relieved by
employed, herself, under ray Al Of these th!uga,
geatlsmcn beyond al dispute ha.! occurred whom so
Stated 10 nontol lint whon se received tho hundred
ollHra tile had only received atoyo aud eon1c bod
tton 70 'e' tho faots that surrounded ihe iseef
Society "t tha limo It was determined r,t,, to
Will call attention to tho facts that occurred when
tlcy did do It, Az stated before, complaint had been
,at one q .ne D n1 IL, hn 10. ,o r9
that M inyostigaston was ordered Now whit @ dld
n NV @ ~ ~ aa. hno ~ sis
Lizzie l. Tucker an: received t,ia long lsi T.. On o
a e ~.
yelnoer alo had implied as sfrn L L TnSlter Or T. g.
Tucker, to thu special relief at tho Church Of tho
nr ffB1 n
Il annc",ed st ae Ind au1e aa Mira. " H. TucKcr
" n on hG s "n sr as On ae
No. rerch atrect. md In thp otLcr ns Nc. irving
onta,oa iho manev from tic Stewart lat, pho gavo
ler residence 1t certan number on Icavitt ureet.
SoW no wod ss yo as candid e wat
tie duty Of tho officers Of tha Society unor tho cir
cumsanees, after They received evidence Of these
% foront resIonccs2 ask YOU, gentlemen, II il waa
not tclr duty to direct lint IN ntorvicw bo Ind viii
Harvey. WHO wus ne,Gor Of Ge Shelter COMMITTEE
Chairman Of lilo EXECUTIVE Committee, and prom-
mont Attorney lad lin attention called 10 lilo
sn;l ensi' ho looked over them and directed
| Mr. Harvey TO hayo sosno party hayo interview
With The leiniG, md sec II Ahe would give up
Air Harvey tho next dny handed tlio parurs oyer 10
r Lanbcrt nj attorney, In thn city, xho VIVA in tho
from fn, Mr. Dexter. >'' 00''0@'1
Now, thon, gentlemen, wo como to tho transaction
Tncy charge u.s. Oh ilayo read to You, In ono count
Will brpakihu and In tho other count with forcing
outsile loor md riotonsly ontcrng mud selling tue
dcfeninnt's roods and carving thc1u away Gout!e-
men wn ;eny lint Wo oso ct m what. in law. ia
cale secal pc or two apccts ncas ono snyn .hat
m Wont I" i'm hn,,no viii ar nnrnssion nn lament
eaye aa eenso s of Sourse' at be tle Case.
| M nction If tresnnss can liz nratnat enyi,ody
rhere nro certai1 circumsta,ccs conectcd with tho
going thcro on both occasions which 4ro untspuscd
tlle first place It'll nnisrntea that Ds.ltner went
there together, and admitted into tho house by
ono Of ,ho family. sho entered at Tho sane tine 10
wero taken in her presenee Without hor milking any
objections, but tho rather pointing out tho hinga
ha heg were
IN, tho instrument waa signed Mt her house, Oh tho
qI 5a 19 u sno 1t ito to me
It.. DrnAner tells cxnctly where she signed It,. The
other witnesscp do not know, because they did not
docs not dispute what Drulner says Upon
that subject So that tho fact that she went thero with
eeatei ills paper in tic louso UPON tho kitchen tabo
stands undisruted. Druincg sWears to it, and he is
M Now, spsai What is this tna!rumcnt9 good eal has
been aad about signing lic to create tlo impression
t s IL ns nSsF y s s % ss Ss sl Sa
wrong wrong thinv. % Bho aaya: hereby deliver to the
Chicago Ad and Relief Society tho following artigieH.
right itlc, and interest may ,nye IL the aamc. Doc
10lh, 1871. Mrs. ". II. Tucker" Is thore anything
stated hero about dotngs anything wrong7 Docs abe
admit In that thn rho has been guilty Of fraud or i'm
proper conduct7 She merely slrrcldcrs tho goolB.
And that makes out conclusive defeneo to this
alleged action Of treBpags, unlesa tho Plaintiff can
establish to your that although so signed
this paper, elo was induced to do It by what thu laN
When we aaow that aio senei ills assent she Surls,
n9r e to a1s 9w that she WIS compelled to
Though thcro may bo no dlsputo between tho coun-
sci and myeef aa to this questioned tureea VIII refer
attention Of tho Jury to tho facta. Duress by
imprisonment and .duress by rnenace ara two
different classes Of durees. II this plaintiff
was actually placed under arrest aud restrained
Of her liberty, and in consequence Of being thus re-
gtrained ne was induced to sgn this paper aud de-
liver these goods this paper might DO void And, al
though ilavo doubt about tho law yo for tho pur-
pusos of this case, II hlo was threatened with arrcht
upon that occaRton, OH tho 18TH Of December by Lam
bert or Draliner and that fearing the execution Of
these threats she ngncl this instrument and ~
these goods, I admit that the instrument is void
and tie aaRcnt ia void And further admit TINT iii.
steal ths constituting defence. 1t would