davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
ToMBS POLICE COURT.


Arrest OF - Ferry Pick pocket.
Judge scott sat on the bench Yesterday In place
Of Judge Downing. ana disposed Of a number OF
eases with his usual prouptness and despatch.
Barbara Rahus. an elderly German lady, appeared
10 make a complaint against Jonn Wilson for pick
ing her pocket Of SIS on the 9TH OF January. Ac-
cor,ling to the lady's statement she was coming
across West street. near the Hobokcn ferry, on the
4th Of January last. and Wilson came up to her and
taking her under the arm SAID, 81 viii help You
across the street, mother" Immediately alter her
Kind ate ndant lett her she missed her poke tbook
she gave a description Of the gentleman ~ Oncer
john Mcdonnell, Of the special service squad. On
companion named Johnaen we're arrested by Oiicer
Mcconnell and brought Ia Police Headquarters.
Mrs Barbara Rahus was sent Tor and AZ soon a. she
saw Wilson she Identified han the man who helped
her across the street. The two were arraigncd
before Judge scott in the afternoon Mrs. Rahus
held under $500 bail TO answer. HIS companion,
Johnson, was discharged a. Mrs. Rshus said she
dfd rot see him and knew nothing about MIN.
Disc arge of the ssssvvdust- Mem.
James Houston, James Nelson, Edwars Bunting
and John ID. Coleman, the alleged 'sa~dustn men,
who were arrested by Detectives Reilly, Ileidcl-
berg and Kcirns ON "Wednesday afternoon, were
then arrai,ned. Counsellor nummell appeared for
the whole patch. They were all Young men, well
dressed AMI remarkably Keen and intelligent look
ing. Judge scott called up Detective Reilly, and
''ofncer. what complaint have you to make
against these mcnyn
Detective Kelly was ordered TO arrest them
by the Superin tendenL
judge SCOTT don't care what you were or.
dered. Where n the complainant On the case
Detective Reilly-iIcre are the circulars which
were found Nv heir possession and we're TO he
sent all over the country. and there are a number
OF letters from different persons throughout the
country, aud they charge these men with obtain
inc money under false prctcncce.
Judge ScOtt--Rut who makes the charge. They
did not obtain any money RON you, did theyG
You are pretty police Officer 20 come into Court
with such A az TINS.
Detective Reilly teNpostulntlnrlyl-f was
ordered 10 arrest these men.
Judge scott-If ordered you 60 Jump on the
house would YOU do ~ You have right 10 de-
complaint being brought against them. These
men are DISCHARGED.
The crowd then lcft the court room IN high giee
laughing quietly az the discontinue ~ The dctcc-
uves
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
CITY COtRT.

The Demand for q DOwcr-SudSlen APP
Penrance OF a Long Absent Husband
Is This Another 0EnOch Arden Case I.
Before Judge McCue.
During the crOss-examnatiOn of Mrs. Elizabeth
Spiccr In her suit against George Spcer to recover
$4,000 alleged to be due her from her husbands
estate, she stated that she married Hugh p. Miller
her frs: husband in Maine, some thirty years ago,
that he abandoned her and that she had heard he
was dead. Yesterday morning the identical Hugh
Miller, alter thirty years. separation from his 'bet
ter hail." suddenly appeared in the court room and
was called as witness for the defence. Mrs.
spicer was thunderstruck. Hugh was probably
the last person she had thought of seeing there
Miller Ii about hlty-seVen years OF age and quite
gray.
AN EvENTFUL CAREER.
He gave his testimony in a straightforward
way, and pointing to Mrs. SpCer, said That is the
business in Boston at that time; she resided in
South Cedar street; became acquainted by her
visiting my store; was married at Freyburg, Me- /;
! remained at Freyburg about ten months; her
father and mother lived there; we went to Boston
and went visiting around; aterward took house
at Jamaica Plains we then came to New York to-
we went to boarding house; don't know where
or how long we stayed; l went out one morning
! returned; found note in which she said need
not look for her; met her five or six months after
IN the street; she informed me that she was lying
York about one week; went to Troy, came back
and went into a theatre; then lived in Brooklyn a
year; went to Boston and found my father dead :;
In ls40 came to New York; lived in Cambridge
port; then went to sea- and followed that life for
number OF years; sailed from Boston and New
York;
NEVER DESERTED HER;
don't know what foundation she could have for
saying so; she knew my fathers family and his
wife.
lie declined to answer whether he was married
or had children, on the ground that 1t would hurt
others and degrade himself.
ON the cross-examnatiOn he said:-when took
my wife 10 Jamaica Plains we began to keep house
got enough furniture to commences; | had no
trouble with her, and did not leave her; never
brought suit for divorce against her; came here
by request and have not been paid for coming, but
came here for the purpose Of testiiyng, instead
Of having my evidence taken by deposition.
The case IL still on.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
MARINE C0uRl-.?ART 2.
Action for Alleged Breach OF Contract.
Before Judge Gross

Action for Alleged Breach OF Contract.
Before Judge Gross.
Louis Lachet vs.. J. 4. w. Schenck.-This action
was brought to recover the sum OF $1,000 damages
for breach OF written contract. IL appeared that
the plaintiff, watchcase manufacturer. entered
into written agreement with the defendant q
watchcase turner, by which the defendant was TO
serve the plaintiff In the capacity OF watchcasc
turner for one year, commencing the 81 OF ian
uary, 1872, and ending on the 3lst day Of Deem
Der Of the same wear, at a salary OF 800 per week
and bonus OF $500 IN hand as an inducement to
the defendant TO enter the employ ment of the
plaintiff. The defendant entered the employment
of the plantln the day specified and remained
with HIN until the 81 OF Aprl last giv-
ing him entire satisfaction in the discharge
OF his duties. On the 81 OF April he feigned sick,
and left the shop OF the plaintn and did not return
until the 9Th, when he came, took his tools and en-
trely withdrew from the PLAINTIFFS employment
without notifying him st his intention oil so doing,
having in the meantime, received his $500, and $50
a week from the LIST OF January. The plaintiff
claimed that he sustained damages TO the amount
OF ST. 900 in his business through the violation OF
the contract by the plaintin. The only defence
was that the manner OF the plaintiff was offensive,
and that on the day OF leaving, the defendant no
titled the plaintr Of his intention To leave, 20
which the plaintiff did not object. Verdict for
plaintiff IN the sum OF 1914. For plaintin, John
Flanagan for defendant Mr.. Lauterhach.
John Winslow vs.. Walter Bowns.-Action TO re-
cover the sum Of s2l5, for repairs a canal boat.
Verdict Tor plaintiff.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,

WASHINGTON, ID. c., Jan. 90, 1873.
No. l02 Brown vs.. Guild ct al.-Appea from the
Circuit Court Tor the Northern District OF Illinois,
Brown flied this bill to recover for an alleged in
fTingement OF his reissued patent for a check-row
corn planter. The defence was that there was no
infringement, and that the defendants were manu-
featuring and selling machine under patent TO
themselves, and that the reissued patents under
winch the infringement is claimed are void, be-
cause they do not clearly set forth the improve
mcnts claimed The decree below was for the de-
PENDANTS the bill being dismissed; and 1t is here
claimed that the Court erred IN deciding that the
complainant had been anticipated In the cOnstruc-
On OF parts of his machine by other inventors, and
IN holding that the appellant was estopped from
claiming the device because he dd not claim 1t in
the iirst reissue for improvements. The defend
ants insist that the patents are void for want Of
proper specifications and for not distinguishing
what Is new from what Is old in the combination.
IL ~ also said that the claim is for eect result
and not Tor the means 10y which II is produced, and
that, IN any case, the pretended inventions were
Ola and IN public use. George Harding for appel
liant; Gookins a Roberts and ). ). Fisher for ap
pCllccA
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
COURT CALENDARS DAY.

SUPREME COURT CIRcuIr-TRIAL TERM-Part T.
Held by Judge Fancher.-Nos. 1891. l441, 1886, 1885,
ela ISL y, lsa sia so7, OIL OH 9i5 sl7, e23, g25
Brunt-Nos. ga, 1922, i6s, 672 $40, 40, 1860
1885,, sos, no. TIA sC0 sea- s72 s74, $40, 878 $780,
ssl, $50.
SUPREME CouRr-CmAMBRRs-IIeld by Judge Bar
rett.-Nos =. Q, -, SO, II, 81 SO, SO, 90 1906 1O9
Il2 NJ, TO, III. i2a, 1872 1853, 1885, 1885, 1885, 172,
l73, MS. Call, 20i.
SUPREME CoURr-GEsERAL TERM-Held by
Judges Ingraham, Brady and Iearned.-NOs s2, SO,
81 rs, So NJ, ls3 1s4, 1885, $50, 1884, 1872 1885, l96, l98,
Is9 2ao, III. 202, 203 20I, 200, pos, 30 2ll.
SUPERIOR CouRr-rRIAL TERM-Part Held by
Judge Curts.-Nos 1899, 49, 1891, 1865, 1917, l3l,
1878, 1851 1899, 1855, 1874 1885, 1921, 1925, 1923
Part 2-iield by Judge Frcedman.-Case on.
COURT oP COMMON PLEAs-rRiAL TERM-Part l.
Held by Judge Rohinson.-NOs 1885, 1896, 2790
l29 lI2ts 3u6. 50. 1884, o., 1885, 1851, 1856, 374
2io5 i72i TG3, 500. 2so7 l2t7 1854, i3O3 1885, 5l2
l6ls ol2 GA lGls 1892 loi4, 5i, 5oi4, TO- So 1709
lCl 32s, 1881
MARIsn CouRr-TRrAL TERM-Part Hello by
Judge Spaulchng.-Nos. 1912 1860, 1896, il42 1865
12f, so2. is2 592 lsOs. 1905, 1872 1914, 1915. Part
2-Hcld by Judge Gross.-Nos. 1921, 1905 1903, 733,
loss l2i9 I2a7 1884, lts 1919, 1899, 1901 l425, li7
l2ss 1887, 1919, 1875, 1871 isO9, 1871, 1917. Part s.
Held py Judge Joachlmscn.-Nos. 0ss, 1902 1882,
los loss Ill., 1904, l7oa, i7oe, 1907 l7os, 7o9 i7i2,
l7l3, l7l5.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
sanderson to do everything in bis power

promised sanderson to do everything in his power
to make an dnaerade honorable, and Henry Z;
bowen, the son. said that Sanderson was satished
when the apologize articles were published.
SANDERsON AFTER JOE HOWARD.
Mr.. Triton called Joseph Howard, Jr. There
was q stir among the spectators in the crowded
court room and the jury appeared to take deeper
interest IN the proceedings. Meanwhile Mr.. How
ard, who had been sitting beside Theodore Tilton,
near the stenographers desk, walked briskly up to
the witness stand and was sworn. He settled him
sell IN the chair, and, after polishing his eye
Easses anu ADJUSTING them carefully, he faced the
G ne told his story briefly and to the point:
SAID he This story was reproduced In the scar;
the ONCE door noticeS t hea man ns Sesna
the desk motioning to me in very
mysterious and cautionary way, and pointing mis-
understand and he stopped me and directed me
into the back room; went in there and Mr.. san.
derson was sitting beside the stove;
sANDERsoN WAS VERY MUCH EXCITED,
his eyes were very much swollen, and in response
to my rather cheering lutaton--.Qanghter)- he
dOl''-(renewed laughter)-"Am Mr.. Sandersonp''
said he; ~ should say You were Mr.. sanderson'-
this at your hands 2" said didn't know what 1t
was; then he handed me copy Of my paper, which
been reproduced; he said he thought It was un-
kind for me to have published that articles he was
very much excited, so much so that directed my
sell rather to him than to the article, and endeav-
ored to soothe him; he was very threatening
in his tone and language; he said some.
ns o a001 Mr. T Ho%ard he ne M0u vent 90 on ~
state thar he read the article through and
questioned him at different sections asking HIM If
they were correct, and Sanderson afterwards ad.
United that the affair correctly reported.
Howard continued And then said, supposng he
would see the point, what have you got to COM
plain of if it is true what's the matter ~ He de-
manded retractlOn, and wanted to know who
wrote r, the article Of course didn't know and
he complained about Bowen advised HIM to
100 FOR" BOWEN
II Bowen had injured him, and that it was square
thing to get even with him. Q.aughter.)
The city editor and reporter who wrote the arti-
Gle were next examined, and Mr.. Sanderson was
called in rebuttal and denied that he had said at
II. G. BOwen's office that any retraction would be
satisfactory Mr.. William A. Colt also denied that
In a conversation with Mr.. Bowen he stated that
the retractiOn would cover the case.
The trial was adjourned until this morning.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
BROOKLYN COURTS.
supRtat cuUsI rIscuI.

Labelling a Lawyer-suit Against q
Newspaper Tor $4,000 Damage--The
Result of street Rsncortre--NsM
York and Brookiyn Editor. on the
stand.
Before Judge Gilbert
There came on for trial yesterday morning the
suit OF Lawyer Elnathan =. Sandcrson against the
Brooklyn Union, 90 recover $4,000 damages Ior
an alleged nbc publisbcd IN the CHioH. II seems
that sanderson was employed a. counsel for
Mrs James IN a suit which she wa. bringing 90 re-
cover some furniture belonging 10 her. which she
alleged. had been sold ~ her husband. 0ne day-
the 10th OF January. 1874 ~andcrssn and Mr..
James met IN 'front.' Of the Court House aud an
angry dispute onsued. James denounced him a.
LIAR AND sC0rNrREL
and charged nim with having tried b sednce hs
damcs' wue. A large crowd concCted and a
fight seemed imminent; ont TIE Fow amounted %
nothing but wind. A reporter of Iowen's paper.
who happened % be- present aurEE ihe eucogrtor.
.'wrote II up aad interviewrd James asa A rc.
port Of the whole arair appeared On FRAT syerirrs
issue, anu the pahlicaiien ~ thai re'pr ssnalr-
son claims was a gross Ihc upon hiIn. ~anisr.on
posted down 90 tie newspaper once. ard sHisc.
quenily two articles retracting snd apu.en,iuE.
we're published in the editorial coluuns ne ~.
fence say that these were accepted a.
COMPLETE skFfsFACfInN
for the original offence, bat >antcrson alleges
otherwise.
Ex-Judge Reynolds and william A. Cot APPEARED
for Mr.. ssnder-On yesterday. ala Nluchcsftf Bflt.
ton for the defence. M. nF.fton when the case
was called on moved tor a dismissal ~ TIE con-.
plant, on the ground that cooperation could not
be guilty OF libel or could NOT te mgefcd IA
damages for libel. The Court denied the motion.
Mr.. Sandcrson, on the stand. related his visit 90
the Union Office, and told how he said he would
KNOCK CITY EDITOR MALLgsTEK's HAD or
n he thought McAlster had written TIE artlcie,
and how he reiterated what he sad % the city
editor 10 Henry T. Bowen himself. M. Bowen
said that they would publish anytnlng he chose 20
write but he said he would not write anything,
and that they must write and Keep on writing until
they had wiped 10 out Sanderson presumed mat
Bowen expected every minute "a have ms bead
Knocked Oh. The defendant told Bowen that TIE
Court OF Appeals had already decided That mere
could be no other satisfaction than dohars AM
cents In such case, the plaintin referring 20 ms
own suit against New York SUNDAY PAPER IN
which he recovered 5,00e for libel. u nrther ap
peared from Sanderson's evidence that the case
had been referred TO a board OF arbitration aud
that no decision had been arrived az Tue unle 81
the first suit having expired this acton MAS hen
commenced.
For the defence Henry Z. Bowen swore that he
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
COURT or GENERAL SESSIONS.
Before Judge Sutherland.

Before Judge Sutherland
woodruff md Claim and Colonel Blood
Arraigned for Alleged Libel Upon Luz
Their G. Chailis-They Plead Net Guilty,
and City Judge Sutherland Grants .
Motion for Bail.
The only feature OF particular interest in this
Court yesterday was the arrangement OF Victoria
G. woodruff, Tennie C. Claim aud james W. Blood
against whom the Grand Jury OF the General SEES
sions presented an indictment on Tuesday for libel
upon Luther Q. Chals, published in paper called
WoodiW Clafhns Weekly. The Indictment
was similar 10 the one already found by the oyer
and Terminer Grand Jury. Before the defendants,
VINO were arrested on Tuesday evening" pleaded to
the indictment, Mr., Howe made lengthy state
mcnt To the Court in which he rccited the main
points OF the history of the defendants Counsel
said that the edtrcss Of the paper in question
sought TO correct the morals of the people and to
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24

by the HANKS were intended by the Legislature TO
b.. Included among those whom the Comptroller
was authorized % appoint For these reasons
arm Of opin on that the clerks aud officers IN the
bureau ~ The Chamberlain were not intended by
the Legislature 90 hc, and were, In fact,
NOT INCLUDED, wfrBis rtfH rowEK OP APPOINTMENT
and dismissal which n conferred upon the Comp
uoller by the thirtysec0nd section OF the charter
al 1870 and n follows that the alleged appointment
set up hy the defendant IN his answer, as his sole
defence 20 the action, ~ inyahd and void. The
pialntius motion Tor an injunction pending the
controversy must, therefore, he granted, with
costs, To ABIDE the event OF the action.
APPEAL PROM THE DECISION
~ wasRtatcd yesterday by Mr. Foley that an aD-
peal Ni az once be taken from Judge Barbonrs
decision. The ease ~ % be carried % the General
Term instead Of TesOrting, az was ~ urst contcu-
piated, 10 gao tnarrdst0 proceedings
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
BUSINESS IN THE OTHER COURTS
TWIN srlrrs rrEv-slIsa. cnuaI.

SEIZURE cf Dsstiiiery I'm koehiand
County--aiIeged Conspiracy Ia Defraud
the Govcspmcnf.
Before Commissioner shields.
Yesterday two men named Christopher Flood
ana Michael McKeown were brought before Com
missioner Shields aud charged with eonspiring
20 defraud the government out OF the tax ON dis
titled spirits az a distiIlory In spring Valley. Rock
land county. n appears that men under the
troll OF superintendent Iiowlsy were nrst led TO
make an Examination OF the distiiiery BY reason OF
seizure OF foI ty-eight barrels % whrkey
az one of the docks OF this city, and the
Information which they received IN regard 10 this
whskey caused them % pay q visit Ia Spring val
ley and put the sisiillery m question tsaid 10 he
one OF tie largest n TINS Statel uner seizure. Al
the examination before the Commissioner yesfer-
day McKcown said he was only a sbOrer m the dis
tillery, and up 10 this time did not really know
what he was charged with. ne was totally inno-
cent Of any crime, and n he had been guilty he had
plenty OF time To escape from the place. Mr.. Purdy,
United states Assistant District Attorney, informed
Mckcown that he would have abundant opportunity
TO prove hls innocence. The accused were held
for examination, which win take place on Friday.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
SUPREME CHAMBERS.


BY Judge Barrett.
Austin w. Duanc.-MOtion granted.
Adkins VS.. McDanels-Samc.
Hughty ct al. VS.. Benger.-Same.
Cutler VS.. McDanel.-Samc.
Johnston ct al vs. White ct al.-Motion granted
and reference ordered.
Newitter ct al. VS.. Schreicr ct al Motion 10 set
aside attachment as to Eugene Schreier must be
granted, with $40 costs, to abide the event.
kOenigsberg vs.. Kocnigsberg. Motion granted,
but with only $40 c-sts
Buel vs. Morgan ct aL-0rder settled as amended.
In the matter OF The application Of W. ]. Ken
nedy, &c.-Report confirmed and order granted.
Wood vs. MARITIME ct al.-MotOn granted.
Hughson vs. Be.-Same.
Marsh vs.. Karnack.-Metion denied with flO
costs to abide the event.
Beach vs.. Coils Jr ct al.-Motion for Injunction
denied and temporary Injunction dissolved with
$40 costs.
In the matter OF Thomas Conlator 10 be dis
charged upon habeas cerpus.-Memorandun for
counsel.
Livingston vs. Williams.-The motion TO yacate
the attachment must be granted, with $40 costs
Metropolitan Savings Bank W.. Wright ct al
Motion granted.
Stiles ct al. VS.. Meyer ct al.-Same.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24

ASrucSF.--0n sunday, January 10, CAROLINE
EiatAaEffI. second daughter nf James 4. aud Alice
:. Arfhonf, AGED year, months and y days.
ftuefal ncm The ltsideAce II her parents, %
West flfshfi street on thursday 23d inst, at
one o'fuE relative ana irleses OF the family
are rtsfe inliy requested 70 attend, without
flrf1rf uafIra.
RsKSLFH.-iu nrooElyn. on MONDAY, January 20,
~ ~inNEf a. hAsKLEf. aged s&years' months
and j days.
Ihe relatives ana 'rcuds OF the family. and Long
Island Io.fge. "a. ss. b. saa A. NJ, are respectfully
invites % sifeua the lunsfa. rom the residence OF
his msthcF. - iufield street. brookph' On ihuFs'
dag "a ilisf.. AT gN1 A. n.
III. ue..i,~fs "a long Island Lodge No. So, +.
ana A "a are hereby snmnioned to attend
stefial communication az their rooms, corner
Cogrt And Montague streets. on Thursday, Janu-
arr "A al one O'Clock. ior tue purpose oi paying
80 - rr1lusr Of respect late brother sid.
n'' :" ""'' 4 : BALDWIN Master.
Attest--Jou~ ScaInGE0CHL secretary.
BFNgsxfN.-On "Wednesday, January -, 1879, az
tour O'Clock q. a., nESKf 4. BESJAniS, In the 37th
ne innsrsl win take plare on Friday. January
"a az tsO o'cloCk Y. M. rom - Pauls Episcopal
church. Jersey city Heights. y. J. Relatives end
friends OF the iainiy are respectfully invited TO
RGowx.-ln BROOKLYN, on "Wednesday January
"a, aiter q short illness, MORRIS BROWN. a native
Of boiikc parish ~ kcluoc, county Clare, Ireland
AGED a years
nis funeral wil take place from the residence OF
ms brothers. Edmund. william and Thomas Brown,
~ flrst street, south Brooklyn, az one Y. NJ, on
FRIDAY. January a Relatives and friends are re-
qncstcd 20 attend.
BucK.-on sunday night. January 10. 1879. CLAIR,
tiii0t vile oi Francis ID. Buck, in the 80 year OF
her are
The relatives ami friends OF the family and those
Of her iaticr, franciS llou and OF her iathcr-ln-
Law. Df. cardoa buck, are respectfully invited "
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
SUPREME CcuHT-TRAl Ttam-PaaT !.
Liability Of Common Carriers Tn Respect
tO General Holiday.

Ia "a Generni hossoey.
Before Judge Van Brunt.
On the Sd Of July, 1865, the Russell Erwin
Manufacturing Company shipped q quantity OF
hardware from their factory In New Britain, Conn.,
to various consignees In the city OF New YORK and
Chicago, which was carried TO New Haven by rail
and there put on board one OF the steamers OF the
New Haven Steamboat Company Tor transporta-
ton TO New York. The goods arrived here ON the
morning OF the 4th OF July ana were placed on the
dock, where they remained through that day and
were destroyed on the morning of The 9th by an
accidental fire. Plaintiffs claimed that no notice
OF the arrival Of the goods was gwen To tae con-
signees here and effort was made to deliver
those for Chicago TO the next carrier. Defendants
gave evidence as 10 their manner Of delivery OF
goods and insisted that their liability a. insurers
had ceased The Court submitted the questions a.
to waiver OF notice and AZ to the sth OF July being
So, ITO SO, the amount claimed Starr Rugges Tor
plaintiffs; S. Z. Nash for defendants.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-24
MARRIAGES AND DEATHS.
N nrrici.

Rr-cARRIcABuRu.-At Havana, Cuba, on
Thursday, January o. 1874 at the French Consul
hate. Mr.. GODrRoy !. AuBERr OF Paris, France, 10
Mis- JULlA D., daughter OF AIR. Josa Carricaburu,
sf havana Cuba.
BARrLErr-NosBURou.-lnB Brooklyn, on Wednes-
day, January ~, at the residence OF the brides
parents, by the Rev. Henry Ward Beecher, Ed
wAKD L. hAKTi.ErT 20 NELLIE A.. daughter OF W. &.
NosBurgh. all OF BROOKLYN. No cards.
MuEkAy-SHRgyE--On Tuesday, January "a, by
the Rev. ~. T. hurch, WILLIAM L. MURRAY TO ADA
a.. ~nKFyH. both Of this city.
Montreal papers please copy.
hCIuNNICk "Wednesday, January
rs. lssS, al the cathedral, Newark, y. j., by Rev.
q. u. Doaue, q. FRANCIS MCCORMICK OF Elizabeth,
n J.. ~ Many ~, daughter OF Daniel Delany. Esq.
Of the fortlcr place. No cards.