, 1873-10-14

aHEHGak6N tR q 8tfaiEbtf0TWafA one, anti IN It
7otorB will havo no difficulty In moving right
,n.-2an Francisco Bulletin.
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT.
Special Dispatch to tho Chicago Tribune.
OTrAwA. ILL.,, Oct. 13.-Tho supromo Court
met at half-past o'clock. full Bonch boin8
present, Tho business Of the day WAS IS fol-
Eowss
NJ Nh. JUSTICE onAro+
44T-so5znour F. Norton y. Andrew Waller. On
tho call Of tho docket tito judgment Of tho Court be-
10" IN this cause wns affirmed for thu Of thero
bong no briefs abatracts upon ntc. A motion ia
no" raaas to set asiao tho oror Of aflrmance, md
In support Of tho motion tho appellee has
h1od IN affidavit, in which hc shown that
hehaa bricis ind abstracts prepared hut made mis-
take ss to tho timo tho causo would DO called, wo
think tho adavit sufficient, and the order Of alrm-
293-Jaeoh Iaao '. Catherine stengcr. This ia an
application for extension Of umo on behalf Of appel
@ S s: s4ssor des s i ws SItsnsa Tee 10 as
alnnr application. The time Will 10 extundel 10
days.
27a-Hlehasda' Iron Works " Joainh ct al. Motion
to set aside order Of aipanee. and for toayo to no
brtafa. Tho motion Ia allowed.
NJ Mn JUSTICE M'ALL1BTrn.
s4a-Mtehaal sullivant, in,pleadsl,v =. tho Slate Of
for bo appellee 1u this 10 DO allowed costs aud
s1pesea of maktng an sad additional abstract Tue sug
that the motion should hive been nude at thas timo
Tho mouon viii therefore 10 uenlcd-
1b.-ffopteS 0oc*st-Iona II; sner"ih '. lAe toope.
Iae 1uoBlnent oi tue CuuIt oeio" Ii rosefseu, tAo
| causo rcmantlea, and opinion filed.
1za:a na m susttns s pani =, ~, 1,.na
numssy. 669-John II. Durham ': tho saino. Tteso
applications for snpersedeas. The Judgment below
orror supeFscdcas. Tho oct Of 1871 required thas
d m aaes M adeDt s haa bsoa
SIDE may ba urged that the Constitution gyca TIC
rtght to prosecute Doth Wra vi error: anu appeal 10
this Court In al cases. w aEo o. tno opniqn that
b sued in, ~, caao where tnsro l.
final Judgment. nut the aucaon, whether y shall
become snneraodeaa or nos We think does not 60 TO
po~er inposo terms I'D eontsSns Ssfors Il
becomes supcTaedeas. II tls were an "a application
@ {" rasea whoer e @ woaa
b. paramount OF tho party hive right Oh tho terms
to have his appeal. BIZ! that question Is not
presented in these casea Tie snperseaeasss @ 49, r. T.
eopy Th he rosons M @ % &c., 10 o
Of 1878. "
~ Mr. MH ou1EF % JUSTICE snEEsE. e;aI =, :, nit.
is motion nnse on the 10Th !ns for Leave to argue
tho cause orally The Court will sate hat tlo Gauss Is
tton will DO denied aud tho causo removed from the
docket.
t1oos o. tA'nJs ~. p' M I na e,oso o5rroo.
ny na9a, ,orod ior au i;naaca ~ he isanod e''''
,.a,,cob n sAosGsra SEs e7'GSs; 70 i,Seesy P rea no.
ton by spEeant for oasoto le reply IN ten ays:
@ ss M9 ea to- to srs ase eor
as per atidayt. o.u. .p,u,., n,,n. x,o.,on
appsss for n19 TINE to e shrrar Motion
BY appeeo for leayo to nlo bref within Len ! t'ays
: 400 Same '. same. ,,,~,
Hina n1n ss.ne nan nv anatac
for extension of time III which to lo br4ofs in a ti's'
MoogSs eis es ss a. & "p Mm .t a rrcars
a1o ny egd,e1 ar Paa o. Waw
aq Ge9t ef eays S1 u
dry pson Sna spSwfr a TrMsteeg Of
Town q 1ado. Motion . t. ls'nss i :; appsal.
sao-sa,,o s4o-samo = : sama. sao. sanle moton.
@ $50 Same Same '. Samo: : sumo motion.
Sst-1ohm II. r. TIino Y. peter HAYDEN ct nj. Motion
IN 'snss nnncal short recnrd 1led aprea d,suissoi
WALL psr ee''< 1uu1ser n.r1 orrur nooHrr
mil p. III, IncSe3 II for tho Inv vs. then n,ae b.
follows; dcoreo q e.,onnol 1t o " clara BENJAMIN
a. Argued Dy G D. S t.He re- n ca eo
y4ss~ohleuso a:eoeIs SorihSeatern Hallway Company
sosthesa Ias faeGot co@psay: Ts&Sa % oa ali; ~ -,
n As31Randolph Burt " 1angtord D. french' Take
4a4zWiliam Q; Miller '. Matthias bonnor, guardian
etc T4ksn aoaat on trao, sal 1oz,o nrono r.asn o
cali. -. r..,,...,
nn1 on a'is ''es''' AA'
o1pfTs{ 1s1pfs{}:orI rnis Gay,n W Fayorits tuplcaded
:. = &c, Taken on cali. ~
/, 4B8-aIyron j. A1uick '. George II. Young OF q
It Taken on call. =, ..,-.
4ou-i1. fEeAttlch 4eAap'o u "H1ea - 1""''"~@