The new North-west. [volume] (Deer Lodge, Mont.) 1869-1897, 1873-07-05

On last Ss' urday the Republican primary
~lec,ion wss he,d IN Hslse-. The pdnciIAl
cm,esi ass for the Sheddsity. The a-pi.
rants we're Jo.rph W.s,lo.n and Seth Bal
k,ck. The BullDck ticket VS. elected y
n majority IT f"rty odd v"'es. II MAS NJ"
alone = c,niest Us between the men. Mr..
Workman had opw.sd The subsidy scheme;
b. had bcen friend Of Mr.. Claxe't, and
although aspiring to this nomination, IN I'll
h"n'r n him be it said. he st'od BY his
faith and his friend y fslteringly. ssesdfas'
and true. scorning IL cri"ge under The lush
# The Ring and maintaining bis faith like
man. F..r this he wss marked for sscsi-
ticc ny faction IT Helena. s.d they. wi,h
NJ. lsulk,cks honest supporters Accs'sn.
plisi,ei their purp se. The record ut
the Smut N,cAiSe IN this matter 10 the rec
.,ssi If that faction There wss n" charge
tn, low 10 trump " against MI. W'~'lms".
anil, M final res,rt, k'csl rrrjudicc against
l)tvr Lhgr and Republicans Ut other h'csl'
tiles was called int" rrqa's'ti'n. an" Wool
,nan hal 10 carry through the 6.ht that
which appears =" lie = burden In Helena.
the RESPECT, g.sd will and g'nsd wishes Ut
M""isnx Republicans IN hundreds outside
1T that nwn. W. IL .rO thai be never DIS
claimed their friendship. The ma ix"an'
disaril,es If the Swxl A..chiMe. aud i's ssser
itun iI,x, ,rse friends s.'ughi IL influence
the Helena p, imnrics In my other way than
Ivy expressing their pref. rncs. and respect
far Mr. Wsn,illIan. We believe 10 Ire ~ false
~ hell. There were Republicans there frs'm
different c,,u"ti-s If Montana preceding the
Primary. Many Of them, doubtless. de-
clsrel their preference f,r Mr.. W"lman
Il ~ not crcditnl,Ie Ia Mr.. Bullock II none
Of them did ~ f"r him. Yet M sllusiDn Z"
suci, men, aud Of their interference, ever
found U ierxnce N the Sss.a u"cAi"e. W.
will noi assume '"sxyfr M present know ledge
that fraud was prrl~'r.iri q these pr
m~rj.s. although the O"seils -ays: This -
The first time tue Hes"M carried . primary
clcc,i.'a, and II u questionable IL II would
uave had this satisfaction had II not been
for tie aid IF DsmOcr"fie Soses." We leave
the Republicans of Helena :" settle that
question ssnong ,hemselves. But We can
ssy h, The people Ut that city. II gentlemen
cxnnM visit Helena M their personal busi-
ness 0r otherwise without bring as~siIe.l and
dcMiuucr.l by your newspapers ~ they have
bsen, y"u will ard your t"wn stunned
aid avoided and tho bu.imrss II would asi.
urally have will W. diverted from you.
Helena il not Montana. NOR are your paIrrs
aud men the NV ones in Montana II you
vii: allow your town Ivy your newspaper
slan.icrrrs and faIsitiers Ia be proclaimed,
~ il 10. tce", AN ls...n"eli,e, hating Ill w
yond its confines, y"u will find thu, hatred
repaid IN kind. AMI the question will h.
determined whether Helena can better
live without Montana, Or Montana bet
ter 1--we without Helena. There has
BEEN tn murh 1T It already. You have
teen male pitit"Ily ridiculous hy the rep
resen a'iu"s 1T y"ur press e,ernally c.mjur.
Ing up some dread calamity being br"ugh,
upon ynu ,,y the little town If der Ldge
"A great giant trembling in fear sni the
swr~, drus of agony weakening you whr"
you thought Ut little Deer L.,igc You
have inundated one If your bes, citizens an
the ALTAR II hatred. and your town il knee
herp in bIa.phemy IT men wh" never did
y"u aught of III d., you think y"u can
sffUrd IL d. ibis? Or to encourage il! =