Dallas herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1849-1873, 1873-05-03
LesaI Notices


/
ys,gs srArr Nv rrxAa ~ rnt snrnif
Won ara hefsby commanded fhal YOU fuligigon /,
| publication lula Me0snah, John W, htniurl
hanh .. Holman, Emma ?. iIoIfaau, John y iio
nah, Margaiet Y, NcAdam.A ni Jesephna mcAaa'.
s.r ha.band hle;cneer 2 ranar''cn 's snmds j
sos, who are nen.renIdonta NJ illcriaie offcEe,
he md appear before iho District court 70 w. hnlle
~ aud for ilu county NJ pnlIsa, ~ The curt heu,
Thereof In the city 81 Dallas or lilo hrt Monday Y
June most then and ihere 70 answer No ps,,,"n
| Virginia A. .HIIc and James H. sllr Ler hnsoann
nied IN said court against the said julia Mcuangi,
John W. Mc0Angb, Sarah ]. IIoimnn, EmmaP' iiol
man. John y. Holman. Margatet Y, Mchhaiaa AM
yosepbus McAdams her husband, Alexander y. san
derson. Hardy ". Hatders0n, faiix w. fanherso"
and George o, sAndsrson, and aleglng IN snbsiane
as follows, to.wlt; Tint tho said Jni'a mcosnEI,
| the surviving widow Of John II. McGAngh, VINO hlo'
IN Ray county. Missouri, on the tn day o. N1ven,
ber, A. ID. 1871; that the said JOHN ". Mc0an.h ~
| son Of the said dccedent and Julia Mc0hngh' 'na
Sarah J. Holman Ia q widow woman aud The daugl'
tor Of said dsoedent and Julia Mc0aueh; that Enn'I
", Holman and John d. Holman arc minor ohl,
dren OF irene Holman, who Ia dead, ana are s,an"
children, on the maternal sldc OF said dscedeht au
Julia McGaugh; that Margaret ". MoAdams ~ ~
daughter Of Mary A. sandorson who Ia dead, ana .h'
granddaughter, IN the maternal side, OF the said dc
ccdcnt and Julia McGaugh; and the said Josepnuf
MoAdams Ia tho husband OF tho said Margaret " mc.
nuhIh, JOlncu 1Dr tue VNTVVrtF VI tut'
Alexander d. sauderson, Hardy H. sanicrson Felix
W. Sanderson, and George o. SnndersoB arc me nj,
nor children Of Mary o. Sandorson, who !" dead ana
are grandchildren. on the maternal sido, o. sa ue
cedent and Julia McGaugh; that tho soresaid widow
ohieren and grandchildren, defendants herein, are
tho only surviving heirs Of the said John D. No
Gangh deceased. Plaintiff further shows uato the
court that In tho lifetime OF the said John d. NC
Gaugh, deceased he purchased Of plaintiff, virginia
A., an undivided one-fourh interest In and to the
ntVi ha nj mn
and lying In the county OF Dallas and state OF Toxns:
Beginning Mt the sou Invest corner Of section No.JS
IN township 2, south Of tho first hnse limo, range !,
cast Of the principal meridian as run by the colony
Surveyor. which IL tho, northeast corner OF a0io
acre survey made for Samuel d. Pryor. living on me
waters a. Five Mile creek corner, stake In prairie;
thenco east ,eS5 varas to corner stake IN prhrn'
from which pecan inches In damefer bears SCUM
G1%o, west 100 varas and post stake IL Incl es IN
diameter hears sonth 400, west 100 varas; thence
north 1000 -yaras 10 the southwest corner OF
$40 aero snrvcy, made for penlamtn Abnott' q
stake from which. Spanish oak inches IN Diane
ter bears north 100 east yaras; thence west ,ss.
yaras TO corner stake in prairie, from which
burr oak a inches in diameter bears north w.,
yaras; thence 900 varas to the beginning, contain
ing 634% acres ofiard. The snnie having bccn To-
Gated by virtue oftho colonial head.rirht ce thcate
OF Nathan d. Harwood ms q colonist In Peters col
ony. ThesaIc ofsaid lands evidenced by deed dated
- day of Is made. executed and delivered, by
the plaintiff, Virginia A., to the said John " Nc
Gangh In his lifetime, and J. W. and j, u. Black,
Jointly, as will more fully appear from an inspcc-
ton Of the came by tho cturt snid deed is in pos
session Of some ono Of tho defendants, which one
plaintiff Is unable to state Defendants, and each OF
them are notified to file the same, with the papers
in the cause, on or before the hearing, to the end
the same he read in evidence on tho trial thereof;
and on failure so TO do certified copy will be rend
in evidence on the trial hereof. On tho day of
ls- the said John u. McGangh, by his promlssory
note of that date, by him subscribed and delivered
IN MI tntiH ipfa iha nttr.I Inns 0f
said land, promised to pay her on the - day of
ls--, the sum Of seven hundred and nnety-thrce
dollars twelve and and onc-hai + cents. plaintiffs
aver and charge that the purchase money was not
paid by the said John d. McGaugh, notwithstanding
the recital In the deed to the contrary; nor ha7aI
part thereofbeen paid save and except hereafter set
FORTH plaintiffs farther show to the court that on tho
22d day O., May, 1871 at the May term ofhe court OF
Common Pleas In and for the county Of Ray. inthe
State Of issonri, the same being court of record
in certain cause therein pending, wherein the
plaintiff Virginia A., was plaintiff and Calvin w
Narramarc, administrator of John Is. McGaugh, ne-
ceased was defendant, which said court had "risdic
ton to hear and determine y the consideration and
Judgment Of said conrt duly given, the said paint-
III Virginia a. recovered against the said Calvin
w. Narramara, administrator as aforesaid, the
sum of six hundred and forty-scven dollars
and thrty-nine cents and costs Of snt, amounting
TO - dollars; that thereafter, to-wit. on the thir-
ticth day of August, 1879, said judgment of the
court of Common Pleas was affirmed with ten nor
cent damages on appeal prosecuted by said plinlniH
TRAITOR In tho Supreme court II the State of Missouri,
the same being court of record and having iurl,-
diciion TO hear and determine the same on appeal,
said Judgment including principal, interest and
damages, amounted at the date of afiirmance to
seven hundred and twelve dollars and twelve COSTS
and remains in full force and effect, not revised or
otherwise vacated, and is still unpaid ard nnsatis-
fled, save and except one hundred and twenty-five
dollars and fifty cents paid and Endorsed MS
cr' dit on said Judgment a copy Of which Only au-
plaintiff here in court produces. Paint
IFS further show TO the court that since the rendi-
ton Of said judgment by said court of Common
Pleas and the atiirmance thereof by the supreme
Virginia A.. that she has intermarried with CO.
plaintiff James L. sie, who is Joined with her for
the purposes of this suit plaintiffs further show
that said note was given for the purchase money
Of sad above described tract eff land, and that they
have the vendors lien thereon, that said Judgment
was rendered sail note and is lien on the land;
and praying that defendants be cited by publication
to answer this petition, that they have judgments
for their debit interest and costs Of suit md for The
of this lien the above described prem
ises and that they be deereed to be sold according
to Law, and for general and special relief and as IN
'uty bound. they will ever pray, &c. Herein
ail not but have You then and there before said
court this writ with yonr return thereon, showing
how you have execuitedthe same. 81 4
Witness, John M. Laws, Clerk Of the District
court of Dallas county: Given under my hand and
the seal OF said court In the city OF Dallas this the
24th day Of April, A. D. 1873.
[Seal.l Clerk Dist. court, Dallas CO., Texas,
BY Y. f. CoomBEs, Deputy. 80 vat