Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1873-09-02

foLIoE COURT, Jsdrs Derso., PRO tenn Yes.
sSd IcS
Miner cus ss sp3 ss.ss ks
EirsbetS Shines, ehsrssa Si,S isascsp, asTy Ann
sa she was iutesticated with spiritual liquors.
charged with keepins disordery house on water
street, GEORGETOWN. ofcer Byram testified that MS
s resort for ali fna. q bad aa. sSS'S
great nuisance TO the neighhorheod. George Johns,
'f had It, lass1s
Tar9sS sd ss ts't shs ad 70 sGs ,ss
h use; prostitutes thieves, and sailors conRr-gate
R sl. was fined go and COSTS or " days in
David A: Rollins, profanity; forfeited collateral.
eGek fsns SsssS loud snd
fame. -. Joseph Ball, loud and boisterous; Is
grant, sent 10 time woIib69ss o1 DSsy r
Dennis McAuliffe. charged with selling liquor with.
Dennis shop and buys his whisSy~somstimes i've
cent drinks and sometimes cent drinks, accord
any day Re sppes rs Ii. afnRs s
an appeal was taken: Jo.eph Bali, charged win
D % f sssan. .Ss and
and sesis; David Msiiissn. threats q MsrssrsS
battery I II ware 1 and cost:
on his S ss ss: o1u ssd
without d't cause $40 and costs Lizzie swanI sgin,
Ths assault sn An WA, msse SS in
and the wOman's dress cut; 8 10 and costs
THE GREAT FIGHT BETWEEN PETER AND sADoNIA
Peter Dorsey, assault uI ssdonia Matilda Dorsey,
ing her The fuss was about tive Chickens sans sSd
Sadonia Matilds in defending herself, used Dot Of
donna denied, but Peter, who was in court said not
aword, but slowly rose and pulled out large oarv-
of his coat, exhibiting large scar on his arm from
bite inflicted By sadonia, and some seaIds by the
after the conflict and he covered with blood and
exhausted from his efforts TO defend himself Peter
states that bis wife is insane, but the Judge fined
CHARGE OF RESISTING TIE POLICE.
sssapItipe pasid Chase, pofcs%an ' Sesdhsn an Is
an able bodied young man. and the officer Q colored
that he psulted the oeers and n. s' profaSs
g. he e
him into bis house and dragged him out into the
IeIs on him. and Needham, resisted ali the time,
Sinking and md kicking him and that hs
nsd ssss was yiRg on the sofa when The
tRsf the sg ana ssd with T charging
Wouldnt Co. and they dragged him and tore his coat
hsd bsen nsss n ne s testified that no words
talking to his folks when the officers came np
s a9d g;ed him very roughly Another woman tss
oeers not to Xii him while they were rel beating him
Nth with their clubs efieer Whiting, one of the Of
fence objected on the ground thai the prosecution
.rnment held that the testimony '0 was He reSu
At this point Needham was arraigned on the charge
the officers He testified that he and his partner
were standing on the corner when Needhsm said he
could whip any black = who were on the
resisted: Offcer Chase gave testimony in defence
sought by these Officers to be Exhibited on this oe
cssion, and that there was no profane Language
used by defendant The court imposed a fne Of
THE RETURNED BRIDEGROOM FREE OF CHARGES IN
Mr. VA Cook. This naEn. S9V fa W., u...,.
peared in court AMI asked that the charges against
his client be heard; that he had appeared several
observed by The papers shat Mr. Hesslef was sum
moned last week at the instance of the prOsec lting
fer appearance from day TO day to answer charges
He desired TO know what charges were against him,
Mr.. Evans.-It is a mistake; the bonds were re-
newed not at the instance Of the prosecution, but
the defence twas we'll known fact that the de.
tect1ye officers had travelled thousands of miles
TO bring the defendant back to this city and thai
they had returned no warrants to this court, and as
prosecuting officer, he thought it his duty to know
why such an extraordinary proceeding had been
permitted. The published accounts had also stated
that the case had been amicabl settled Itwas due
the government to know how and why such a case
could be settled without the ordiuery channel of a
newe9 for the appearance Of accused from day to
day until the papers In the case had been returned.
Mr.. Cook stated that the otIcers knew their daty;
me warrants had not been issued by the Police
Court, but by United States commissioner, and the
papers had been returned to the from whence
they came.
Mr.. Evans contended that the Police Court was
the only competent authority TO hear the case.
judge decided to dismiss the boDdsmen, as there was
no case In the Police Court against Hessler.