The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-02-19

his %ccomS sns Also rms IN he
has shar ere Ps NO Su 81 hs getting
Gw hm 81. psr rs's
wmem me true relations between the Credit MobilieI
"a,
danger doasss saS a invssgaicn and 1 action
voras Railroad ana Mr.
but he S9 sy and
to % s sse Of thu
Sosr far as i ss sd sy S nf mr.
S to rsss Rs H% ' rf' OF we'll s
e in and s %G
n as y % SUBJ
W seonn and Mr. %ashbarne q illinois The Commit T.
tee believe that MI Ames in his distribution OF tho stock.
HOSTILE EFFORTS or THE MEssRs. wAsusynS
&c s
il quite appase;nt The foregoing deemed by
with What wis be as ST Ais
MoSer Senate sa p"b lie ss%
s'fTs 81 SSss
Al :, then members Q, either house
having directed that evidence transmitted to the
Wen 9f House, S' fully G~n PS%aS as
far s as members BE- Of the Senate arc concerneL
gentlemen who then members OF he House. but arc
nave and @ within s
Ss 20 The S 20 .re h
over them as members the committee have deemed
G so soa Of sSi
In regard members Of the present House
the committee deem y their duty TO state specially the
instances. is painfully conflicting '"'"' Al ''"'
snssG % 9 %srS %s
SesSs Elaine Who oSed Inc s Sisis%'
WITH nf na n
sScS nyss,%ss son.as ration %r ssIns con-
Railroad Company and did take it. and never paid
or received a sSssY on accom-! Of it ..
5 %
% Ss ns that Ss had sold a s Sn
1 ESn Lex n% S Se
5 SsYos ne S5sdi, SoSs1
asaa s%oasS they Would ' n %ons yA' o%s
sSIs sns
ock he would his MONEY! win ten Tt eens
int e M
sGHs a s Da%es s
Ss %aes be- Sn M as 81 n the & Of Jan
rom h y the psyo Of ' and A@ss
in money ~ n. "A
nna SDpsa hs Upon accounts Seiw cen
mt wss Rad to ME-
@ In the 81 n
By the former owners Of the charter Of the Credit Mo
4's
z%s, ssSs.
ters in when Nc Dawes was allowed for the money no
DIV Mr. Dawes received no other benefit under
after the settlement had further Interest in the stock
h4 ssss is Re os
s: Wien e
Ss a e
Would ts naHS sS snS
Sm snG S
dsnds aoSys that MI ssoafl said he thought he would
sS &:
ali sold he would take nss sa ans
ss as ''S Sa S him %mts
na Go1 Ame: EsssR! '4sFs'0 seod SHi
he !, could have he stock but could not give him ce
received bond dividend OF e sx!ao psr
s sn S1s
the sixty per cent cash dividend the stock in
before The close that session CONGRESS
ana seas%s%i was made Ss.Sssn them a'ois
seoed took onion S'f Pacific G sioes
nss sSss nS'
back T. Mr. SS ns nat he only
Ames states that he thinks Mr. scOSd had shares
SS:ss
in the and
no benefit thereirom.
II 7esT SrS Bingham
tai would him his money with proaisbs di"i
dends Mr. Bingham agreed TO take twenty shares, and
s value q stock Which ssssasS hl%
70 Mr.. Bngh I'M and some retained by Mr. xmcs. The
T Eel n is7s when settled 6y Ames
NJ :, S. sSS
o. the agreement 70 take December 1851 the
pSS'sa' .sf Ssrs as
ssns to be able
r,ou mr. sR WILLIAM D. Ks5Lsy, OF rrsssYIvAsIA
hf @ h %m asr %s mn
cre ), from July 1867 Mr. Kelley was moi prepared
h qn he pay the q day Of
Crs oSsr Stock IN tnon aee t BINDS pf Mr. hnes
the bonds as the stock stood in his name and
June, 1868. there was cash dividend OF sixty per
cent, which Mr. AmcS also received. The proceeds
of the bonds sold and the cash dividends received
Ames amounted to $S76 The par value the stock and
interest thereon IRON the previous July amounted
sloi so that after paying tor the stock there bal
ance OF dividend due Mr. Kelley 500 ON the 23d day
OF June 1865, Mr. Anes gave Mr. Kelley cheek for thar
sum on the Sergcantat Arms of the House OF Representa-
yves ana Mr. Kelley received the money thereon. The
committee epd that Mr. Kelley then understood that the
money he thus received balance Of dividends due
him after paying for the stock All the subsequent dv
bends upon the stock either in Union Pacific |
stock or bonds and they all received from Mr..
Ames In September 1873 Mr. Kelley received from Mr..
Ailcs 500 the money which understood between
them TO be advance TO be paid OF dividends There
has never been adjustment of the matter between
them, and there Is entire variance in the test
mony OF the two what the transaction between
them was, but the committee unanimous In finding
the facts above stated The evidence reported the
House gives subsequent nogota-
tons between Mr. Kelley aid Mr. Ames this subject.
The committee do not deem it material refer to 1t in
their report
u. A.
The facts in gard 10 Mr. Garfield found by the
mittee identical with the case Kelley %