, 1873-12-04

-,,,,u,a ~, ,,.,,,,o J.. ,,,. L., IL. .,... 49,, .,.
w WI III h ~ tno' ' AZ tontenaed ny tno aefon-
took cce, aud nee @ oneratiye ta etenant c"n n,s9
nut eyaael without lea'ad mon ,tlio paiutif 10
I'LL ,css tha rnntroct $ w.s mnrfnrn1 1hs I'LL % ,tso
wou 10 roacine, II o 1eay wns Snroaso1oiS ,ns RoiGs
s"sae In eorae Z eosseo @ s es'l t a ~
1n Y d s9s9gn s n NE shtt t9 ease ; ,s the oy' a.
ready nit in tlo Iu,liinu. sMoh ~ statumant would
lSSS hsys xeIdsd e goey Tao aads!ts;Kas of tl,s
uns In m}res,1v iii. nniicv wna III 10 In oner.yn ut
sSac bs e aae II sa1toIlies and was not no
anln ta nj cc 1.n 1t q II, r tnoro WA IN acnes-
seco IN mi the 1 csy nj s to at tio md no onan That
snown WIZ 'Ao"'" 10 p"' III "''A"' n.y.
now rectr 10 tho points which consider Tho main
aufS r. e. thu II III, Y 1ran as I " IT, eaS s
atoring oar. Ths rlnnta sl!owa hia roltoy. notice.
nrjun fncig cnso Tho defendant hns tinlortakon
| 10 proyo ltat tho plaintiff burncd tho rrnr
er.y, ,'es Or ca,scsl il "a 10 b,rnc. Til. king
nSs Se Ss s ,ns's s sot only pssponefaca q
To osea et Sy n liz efsan sccks 10
establish this +, arht, by tho direct Testimony Of
aiorrs .. Smith md Fclix 8'gor that cue ct them
ret fro to the building, aid by tic procurement Of
thu rala The second cnas Is cviacnco teut',lg to
cnr1obosato tho tsstimouy q snl'th and stEer;
exaggerated aud fraudulent Bsatoarnta Of thu loss
80 Sustained.
Smith a,,t sIglor tcndtng 70 show that ho building
was hroa BY to nlaiatiii have to ssy 'hat Iy Their
sn IL s fy 81 S 9ps Of H. e. Cent
mony ahond 10 received with to ntnoa caullon fo
Jury ought not to na for tho defendant on tclr tcati.
circumstances that tho Jury be'iavo these have
substantially sworn to tho truth. III Weighing mud DC
caretally consider their Respective atatctnonts,was
their testimony Sustained and coherent the intrinsic
ind proved fncts tho motives OF tho wnesses ~ do
veiolcd or stated i'll this caso tho caructor IF tlle
,1ci tho pla!ntia knowleago Of their character ard
seconily, yoa are 10 confider, In connection with
tho testimony OF these nun. TUG iacts and testimony
support tlclr statements ninoh Of tho testimony laa
but ttlo ssgnlcanec oxcopt az tonH 10 corfooorao
or, - r" M o e o. anose c you
from outside sources, hn not for onn TO- sustain tue
other but they must each 10 sustained by oxerinso
Prominent among the corroborativo testimony in
slated upon by tho defendant - the ov'lenco tending
to provo tho suspicious conduct OF tho DEFENDANT boiA
before md afsor tho fro h!s frequent ineryioWs
Of slger watchman, when llo stated thst ihero
as9 @ il IT, s, s ts e ss e
a!dcred BY you ALSO tho arrost Of aigcr. and hiH
hSarng sdr9 @ MAGISTRATE ,, tue 9 of az
writing letters nctittoua eignaturea hia meeting
witn ssltr a,d smith on forms Of e1'aty n INC Tina
that he was employing them to burn tue building and
ais taking slgcr away aud erloyig him III H'sant
the defendant maintains, completely which is only
for You to weigh these fAcs aud to kay whether thoy
,naain Or corroborate the theory Of .le defendant.
guilt ct tho palntii, other with Smiths and sIger'a
evidence, isI , or without h,u!. .. . H., uo.,,.,
destroyed. 4 largo amount Of testimony bears upon
TIM vano Of tile machinery and property contained III