, 1873-12-14

when Il Ia BcoH TINT tho Government must provo ith
css or anore nson proof at Would e reauire
Of tho Government talnn ia arkcl III casn Of lte.
setyer? Te nswsr f. ,., fur less III nnnkscy: ~
maut, by III canrtrollcr, by Its D!anct Attorney
COMO into this pia.rct Court Of ban'ruptcy
ct: n tho other proceedina, tho oovcrninct. must
Institute and conduct tho whole rrocsctuH. n,lal try
,. s sgna ga + sasss sss s Y 5asss gF sse%, sd S ss,
Tho amount mt Of is claim alonc, but Of asr1l ca!
ad lat not by ils nut but in court II artcs tlcairo
onco md III tho proceodnN under the Receiver 1T may
hnye to appcal to tha court hundred times.
orty from is haas of tte issgneo That Ia IN p saa
60 o,, could not ho oircetua. wy pr2perty won! b
sacrificed upon aae upon execution The Comptroller
could appoint hcceiyer, md Receiver aeize This
ia hns aes', u 10 clmer9 Il H. nes a;d eanno % Go
apaaat hs ni.' ani No Xoo % can 10 eve by o aet no
ss brought because Of this provision tor Receiver.
Tho argument weighed serat3n!zed vii! be found ,9
tlo oomrtrollor wish to nrpoIn. 1scceyer 70. mGre
malice mere e3ors!so Of pwsr al tue @ saas n Snd In
] smy supplement- 1 I'll lint Il th5s Court Its Heeever
,oa would S tug os AssgneG e. Il tho eo tine LIS
But another imaginary trouble Ia suggested. tho
No roviso, io for r'It Tls Is sat for ho eank iii
tile answer Is very easy. Ihoro sa rroyaion for Tho
at n aaneo hs s s sr s
take Tic ovcrptuA would 40 10 tho Assignee, Just
to tho ba for iysi" 10 aGng It's eroaors aa IN
Hero We say Congress- has shown tho policy a', rr-
pose Of speedy at}istnlont-of swift j'lsce-uot ony
H. a S nkf II zig sS s ae e % en hey oes esrssss
provide for these eorporations-n which for
hG e aa ss 9o 9aSs5s tnssp sns prgas 1 @ pss acs
not !esB speedy than against otl.ora but mora speedy
than those ugatnst othe1ss,- lrompt action ns
ongt to bc used against e eustoltata Of the money
great could bo struck Mt tho pcrmancncy md stability
q these hanks Is to LIT th9 public sce sias thsy fail
~ hS IL 1 Of p9ns s s' sv t sy sS M o
lacd tho law md tho cors, tho Legislature and tho
JutSary hnt they can ps vsen M tney get ,rcay
privilege whcrc equality ia exprcascd 70 SEQ intc
tion to exclude n remedy wl,crc 1t is expressly
gyten by the no s9 m aeo ss s o
nall tho Court 10 usnrp tho functions Of the LegaA
trc and to go back 10 doctrines Of construction long
] cned Tribunals Here M | lis Words sod in tho law arc
neither doubtful nor obscure, nnA 1t Is forbidden to
look ior The meaning of tho Legislature outside hcir
or inconycnienco," says Story, j., fought to havo
LITTLE wGgh M ose of, Of L1%' 3Sn II Ss na
Legislature Is brought Into question. IS to adhere
10 tho words Of tho atasuto constituting then, accor-
stand in tho net Of Parliament. tIsex ys Ramsgac:
{ g: 7l2] nThey (conrts) aro ,ot 70 presume tho
intentions Of o but to COLLECT @ them hen from @
nothing to do te'th The policy Of fhs iaw' 10 l.
C. 5o.}
rrcclsc atd tic intention Of Congress Must h eooc
cd from them uuu the sound doctrine IL well known
10 Your Honor tint, III such casc, the courts ara bound
to obey tho law, matter what may bo their opinions
OF tta wisdom aud policy.
The arguments wore concluded. and the case
taken unuer nlviRement by Judge Dlodgetk.