New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-04-22
G0tRT REG0HD.
MONDAY, APRIL 81, 1873.
GsiseA states Circuit GsHrf-Geisse T..
%. BurslI, 1istxict Judge.
Tse grand jury are ordered to be Summoned 70
"Wednesday twenty third instant.

GsiseA statss Circuit Gswrs-9eisse T..
g. BurslI, 1istsict Judge.
Tie grand jury are ordered to be summoned Cor
Wednesday. twenty third instant.
Supreme CsTrs Of lsuissn~as
yhs following decisions were read to das
RRHEAaISGs REFUSED.
No S556. a. D. Coco IS I. ,. thienemAs.-bron
No 1869 Harriet 4 Mills W. shesiso ID East Fe
licana From Fifth Judicial Court
No. 1857. 7. n. HvcOcI sc ais 70 Jane. We
quad, experimentation .he seventh Bistr ct
Court OF Orleans
10. 1850. Succession 81 q. g fayns-ETem
probate court, parish of Fast SehcianS.
No. t5j5. John D. Biar. appellant, vs.. csniel
No SOL louise Vintsr vs. William hdrkhAM ~
al, ap9.llsnts.-Frem Fifth Judicis! DistI..
BY cHI.y JUSTICE LCHhLGsG.
Sc s60s. state OF SOuisiana rs!. Thomas
lynne, appellant VS.. sharles clinton. State Au
ditei.-FrOm Suvericr District sOuTt. Judgment
affirmed.
So 28;o David 6 Labstf Va Julius Go'dst. in
appellant FROM silth District court. Judgment
affirmed
No. 1853 STATE OF Louisi.n. vel. vi Ii am "a
dick appellant, vs.. Judge Of the second -tSct
Court of Orleans. Nauddmus made peTtmptorV
No 267t. J sse A. Bynum V Fl. Kendall Garter
L 90, appellants from sixth District Court Nf
OF cans. judgment atirms d.
no 45.i. state OF Lsuisana sI rel. .. W-.l ct o..
IS. Judge of Siit~sntb Jud ciai District. Nandamus
40. ~. Mazursau R.nrsn appellants, ".
II. Morgan ct s-FrOm seventh distinct court OF
Orleans. Judgment sflirIed.
so 1855. African Methodist Episcopal shlIItI
". u. Clark, SppPllan".-+Iom sixth District
Court of Orleans Judgment affirmed.
No 2:o9. tats \ Downing 70 b. ;. h H J'n
DistTicu Court of Orleans. Relocating. ud.ment
set aside. Deere in favor OF intervrner.
No 1892. 4. Htenberg.r 4 Go appellants, Va.
". IL. Heys et sl-FroIn fifteenth Judicial Dl--
trct tudsmont reversed. Plaintiffs emit dis
No 23;, Success son of widow lie Grehcn.--
From Second District tolrt or orleans. Petition
OF Gus'sve Lu,niu.s. aiministrst ~ Hdsm'hJ
rev ed.
~ ,.TisS T.IIAFhi.H.p.
~ as. state OF Louisiana OK eel. James i'arsey
Metropolitan Police Board, appellants From,
sixth !,sricts 'urt OF orleans. ApIea! disni ssed
no bond ha Wing b,en filed
\. .9jI. Jsc.b Wedner, appellant. -. Canal and
Banking Company -Srom sixth District Court o
orleans Judgment affirmed.
No. 1861. Dexter ~ Hitchcock w. Southsra Pave
,n.ut company. app@llant-.-trOm sixth bsiSlct
t.art OF orleans; Judgment .ihTinen ,.
Ne tbl+. Marcel Guii.ry, appellant, vs. }. J'Au-
nedud \ sO.-FT.m sixth District Court 0t IEleane.
Judgment ior sl.!sniant reversed pisiHt.h q" "a.
SDveg S6O..
JrsE.s BOWEL.
~. st5s. %iss Bibiana BrandecI,-, .:e ~ IienSy
Walker va. J. H. E,iprsn ap0e llant.-from Fourth
D strict Ceuf, of orleans Judgment affirmed.
20. 1903 Succession OF octave NlveA-frOm i't"-
bate Eous. OF Assumption parish. Judgment
affirmed.
Tounover ct al, appelisn'.-From seventh Judi
Cis District. Judgment reversed. WY. j., dis
sentng.
appe, lants Prom Fifth DsiTIc: Court -. :.ieans.
Notion 10 Gis8lss appeal ov"rruleh.
JT.TI.P wlGs..
NJ Asa. Widow de 81. Romss .. al. srrs iants,
Vi. Widow Fanny Blanc 90 al .-Fron Fourth Dis-
.vr; Court of Orleans. Appeal dismissed.
SO i6It. city OF New orleans vs.. sundrstsx de
liuqu. nts.-fsule takes bs John Burke. clerk "f
Nupesor District Court, city of New Orleans, t.
compel the city TO pay nifty cents each on 1900 tax
suite transferred from ether courts: Judgment OF
superior 'IstrCts0uTJ in favor OF Dnrse reversed.
80 443s City Of Baltimore appellant, -. Hsurv
Psr.nse-from Fifth Dist let Court. ho'on 10
dismiss appeal heri+.f. Judgment amended.
shsrifts charges of = 1873 49, and plaintiffs Jung
inent OF 56!0 % so be settled first. Charles IuI
pin TO receive balance Il any, and ray casts
Nos. 28lJ and 1926. charles Bell vs.. z. II. ~ ert.
Bait Thorn y 60. .aynshee., appellant -Fr'uI
sixth District Court at orleans. BehesFng. Jud-
M ut SUSTAINING appeal and 'tyersths decision OF
lover court I" remain undlstuI bed.
No 1885. 9arpeI, B-!tIsm 60 ~. shensHortH.
CASEY GO, '.nts.-r'om zenith Dia.rst
AOur'. Judgment siifme1 with ten pes cent
damages '"r frivolous appeal.
so. 1909. X. =. young We. scot: '"g" and g.
Cavaro-', appellant, e aL-froh s"'i" ''t'it'
Court OF SrssLs. sudgmelt atiire.':
y. pas. Armand LartiqU" IS. clara Wtlte.
VT. OF Carl Aohn, ao9ellsnt.--f:om tomTtG p,s'
tts' seuYt ~ strirans. Judgment SiArndtd. r'-
.iuc.d to boo and d iirrnet.
SO. $3.50. som" 70 Eliza Whit, -i~ of .. "Hf
lit, spy iieIit.-S ON fou!h plst'.t '0uli 81 or
lsaue. JudgntDt reduced 10 lJH a.d affirmed.
So. :}s.. s. Hsttalora AID T. y Etmela, appel
@sts, .. Aisel' :ratb - a. From >ev"t'h "''-
'IitI - .lsl 8t N'tlttNs .te"Hl tilii iit'h
30. 3a3s John X. v-srh.s.v. srrrIi.ur, -. Hrs
szeuiA Nhep.-Frcra ~tth 0.s,s.t '"ur' Ut ar
isrns ! Id.Ae1t sliigW"'l.
No. .id'. Fst,,'. Erwin 80. Sam"s y Ir''r."a,
spp'l'nn'.--trein seventh rs!il"i '",i'' 81; 90
!r.ns .u'ismr't sIn''l,iy's 'nd 'i''r'"'"
Ne. 3" George 10. Pact s""'. apP"....i. =
"' ''O."A's So"SH""t s,Tir'ned
'r.esE ~oE..ss.
y" 'S' Js%r' Hugh; appellant. ~. s',".''.
Hernandez 90 "L-FSom Eighth District Cont -!
E-ltdflu. Former Judgment I. THAT tue
Judgment OF the lower court Ae affirmed t" s".
main uaGlstur3ed Justice Wyig dissenting.
No. cl5s sieargc 70 BuCknal vs.. Well hennlng
z So, sppeNsuts-FI"m Seventh District Court e!
orleans Judgment al! cm,d.
=" s'sS Celumtis Fire Company w. = -
irs.rh \ Purcell, appciian:.-fr"uH tlhh Ul,ir''
Sour. Of orleans Judgment "t.trmed.
40 l6n?. state ~ louisiana rel. Z. H,,f". ~
pelham, -. Anton. putu.le', state TIcaSHr"r-
PROM IN" Superior District sourt. Judgment ts- !
yeTscd, maudsmus T." assn" directing The State |
Tr.asurrT TO IaE the warrants ann" Ned /" TeatOT
petition ont OF funds IN I'll. State tTss-u.S AS-
yropIiats8 tsr that purpose.
No iFo} John Shapus. appellant SANE. . !
From rnr superior District Coat. tsl%N.rSS !G- /
e.gsat And mandamIs granted
superior District Court.
Tomas Lynne and +. ! Manning - ar'" "i !
Ne" orleans lcj1ns'l;dste'ai SUE sAsi'" apt"Hi |
=; P Hsagh.on IS Vi sernon. -%x"e..in- To- IN /!
uocton overrued, injunction mtdg perpetual
State Ot L0Ulsiaui IS, Edward boott.-On mo |
ton Of aclendsnt, through his attorney suggest
l. That ehe ~rH Ell riuucHi"8 ASs Been Issued :
in The premises
, Trat the law under which sad rjUuc'i"f hos
)ren az ked does not allow a preliminary lIIANc- ,
ION VIII. Their obtained rN pdlte OF upon hearing.
3 That the construction p aCed upon said la" !
% The Attorney General renders the same ohn"N .
ans 10 articles four and tive lection OF the Ted
raj constitution by deprivirg defendant OF he !!
property without due proc IS OF law, and BY deny
no to him the equal projection of the Law; 3u' |
more especially by abridging his privileges a4d
as a citizen of the United NtafSn.
Thar said makes Inc revenue Nv
broTi",,s - srtjc+ 10 of the STATE "oustftui
y the invasion of his vested rights.
: That the plaintiff has not taken fhc oar -
uired NV the statute. aud other laws IN pdrl fn'
era tor the issuance OF preliminary injunction,
.or has he made the required allegation OF facts
or that purpose.