, 1873-12-12
THE COURTS.
An Appeal Allowed in tho Tax
Appeal Cases.
Appeal Taken by tho Republic Lifo-~
Tho Uhlich Will Caso--
Bankruptcy lions.


,.,..,n.. 1.u,,n
N'hn"p'o5 A'oA'''
--
r,7r puvvey7varrA nA1r.roAp CASE.
n,. 49,. ~ H., p.,,n.v1vnn,o 1,a,,road Com
Ano s'ae ~ *.1e 'te'' -, ,a o,1,ora ia Mt
Pahy hBaihst Jonn D. oneF'l'a'4 "na o -, ~
Inst closed, and tint, too, without 'r,"'' Nv
published Tuostlny, tho elaborate and exhaustive
opinion OF Judge Dlodgott, giving an a1nplo
,,,.1,,u,, - 49, ..,ntrs ri tho cnse. Yesterday,
"'laAss's o' ti.o sl.saa % NV ." ~ a,o ,,ra
COUNSEL ior pla'asln asheu 'c"'o ~, t1,,a
defendants re-tllod their rloas Of performance
an, ~ pnr oat foctum.
1,1,,,,1,n .to,, ,nroro1 tn cjvo oyidouce In sup-
Plainti1l then ohorcu ~ s'So o'Iuo - . o"r
Was then asked to Withdraw juror rhnu ha7o INC
capo continued alleging that they wore snrpliBod
hv Fin r,,l,nr AZ to the cyilonco, which would
~ 1"o a ,a..;.1 ..1 ,ao,r ,1,o r,ort,oo @r,oro
toy eSe were neforo ta a easo begun Tho JUDGE
however. denel tho roqueat, OIL The ground TINT
TIM nlnintifr had Ind abundance Of tiuo, and
n,cht hnvo known what would bo tho probable
s'Is. - 49, aa,1ta,t ~ .t.,, ,,,etrrc,o oa t,o
afsit Oh tho eol'sess' iae the.s 'ah'A oo.a4 %Ao
jury on tho evidence already gvcn to render
verdict for tho defendant, which was dono.
Tho cnao will nnw 70 to tho sr~
.,-o,,,a To,rt ~, t,,o oncat,on ns to tho
correctness Of tho ruling Of Jnhge Dlodgott as
rooaytls the exclusion Of tho loase, whith was
ofroroa II, ov;1orco ond r,lod out. Tho contest
:. - ~ ,,....,a,, a,,or u,o, IN ,,oty p{,na
H ono ol tEe sn"rlos' ose1 eo'.,. w A ,,',.s.
were lawyers OF rocognlzou ab'llty. atta hothtng
was left nndono to sustain or delcat tio leaat!'u
Issues. 1twas supposed tint q count IN asssnl,
sit would be added. Or rather, tlo actlon chahgea
to ass'unpult, on the agrcene',t to to MAKE 1 lh9
ASH cave Tuesday to do 80, but tho plan was
evidently changed.
THE TAx~ArrEAL CASES: ~
Yesterday morning, Judge NllAams Gasc ma
decision I'll tlo tax.appcat casna from the county
Cnurt, which Aavo beon running along lor some
time, to enablo him to give tho oWnloh OF 1no
Buprome Court.
The cascs were appeals from tho aec'e'on 5Ea o.
tax-.pyy, An Injunction was granted ex pnrte
r. t,,o }iro,,;t f!c,rt nn1 not;nn wnu nlnlte by
Mr. Tuloy, Corporation Counsel, 10 laso tho IN
junction hlasol'et Ing motloh VII H. tsuuu'
and tho Injunction d'asoiyca. 1hqgieu!.'n,
Of course, tlns tho ortlor isHolving tile Injunction
was Al, intorlocutory tecroo from wilici. no at,-
ponl would e, mosea to dsnas @ ,ie 1nee soysaa, ax
na ".on' ,,air i,,,s mao ~, ,"~,ot ~
casa es whn ~ VIM aowed d. ro % noxt move was
to uBk Nh apprni from tho order which hsd been
granted in accordance with their own wishes.
suc1, rrnct;eo wns mt yaTa1lco with tho decisions
81 oI III ,t a. S"ars Mr. Hoiy s;tcd
caao Il. t scam,1on lsep, whore similar mo,
tion WIN allowed, aud also stated TINT t,ore Ind
been rccen. decision Of tho Snpro1no Court in
Ill mot fec sat,.tic viii, mere stntctncut as to
e.,a W." ~ 5oria;o, md ,aro linn for counsel to
write to tho Supreme Court and onta'n s3 eopy Of
maae statement Of what Judge MeAl!sstss Nc, had I'D
tin subject. Tho Judge was still in doubt ou
tho law. it beings 90 ropugrunt to his vlows Of tue
to allow him time ~ write TO Iaogo hlGhiiister e.
hmss whic inq moaes fraS uo a VI mshstaEy hhlssy
Which we publish I'll full, as fol owa:
WAuKroAS, Dec g. 1873.
7he 1'et'. E. =. N',iiams: A.. MI, ,,.. ro.ro,,rn
MF DEAR Mr. aoats oi w. oh ss., t tx
sxht of sppeal wheso thcro IL only all nerocn.ors
ceiycd. Iu answer, would hay that notwithstanding
aoae dissasfactio tho Court has always udhered to
ths de.un in peScost y Mnga1er Seammon,
Tlcneyef easo las Snasey @ T tra II ho sonsno
tne o1 my eoa..s '.ti or WINS s'n =" rco ,,1nn
rsrrt tra N IN liz case OF j. D. Ca.on against the
ns1awa nawnoo r. ~ For River Railroad COMPANY. .whicl,
wns . bl for injunction. enslorary Injunction
had been allowed mud dissolved By the Circuit Court.
error refased to order IN n}uncton on .ae e1oa M
taat error "gh'a as nos n M RI, taur ccraas
i"riut,on and m oniuiun was written. but tic caae
va helicI. anu tbs oiiulon not tilel recolec tht
case Of Weaver V. Foyer. Iho motion 70 0lsmisa
nal dspoaion Of to esse y tho Court Ia issovlne
e @ ana afcaa t. th "nf nfee eo III ~
n,eaon eH M na 1 vrt,;ay reserysd nnt tho ua dis
ansition Of lin caso y Ao oluiou recolicrt ano,c,
case. which ain not at liberty to mention by
whore tho bill prayed for oor relief tho injunction
was disaolyod, ntd then comp'a,nats als: as:
n'tssra hts Mh, sna a,ts,, W. Voaas so,, hem ,a,
was no n". M sons hay" nnc ~ snt6 h"r
been IN lie Court. tbey arc to the effect that II h
Div nrayor Of liz ill In for an Injunction mud OH
has been Issued aud then dissolved, tue decree dis
eulying it ia to 10 regarded A. dsmsaal Of tho bil
aud dual disposition Of tue eH''so: Hsspec.fah!
ronss, W. n: MoAAA'hskm' -. .
Judge Williams tt.on SAID tint. IN vie" OF thl
letter, tho case IN scammon' 9nd tho recent DO
ciRions, he would ho oblgod, though 1t wa'
AGAINST bis Interpretation of tho lazy, to gFau
an appeal to TIE snprome comst a. n .ie plese','
cases. about twenty-toar u az. hut lie SIOUX a.
luke some 1ncasures-and 20 lsed already beer
TALKING Will tue other Juoges III ClthneoFy-I'
4aye the system OF granting 'a]us'cssons ex part
hkf1rG h1nRtDfh