Eureka daily sentinel. [volume] (Eureka, Nev.) 1871-1887, 1873-05-29

as they bear very little releyancv r.,
The main points i'm the case. ="
Defendants next called Tim. HALEY
who testified i'm substance tho same
Mccoy, with the addition that tho,
a also struck ore upon the surface Of
the Richmond claim.
Plalntiffs now rise i'm objection IN
all that portion of testimony whicb
refers to the Richmond mine: becauSa
the same IS no part of the property
sued for i'll the complaint. Judge
Beatty remarked that he and JuGTe
Nckenney were alike in their opin-
ION, that ii u ledge crops out within
the superficial lines of the Richmond
claim II extends by its dips within
the parailelogram formed by the
boundary ines of the Lookout mino
1t formed no part of the latter and
denied. oo
Thomas Short was next introduced
to testify upon the part of the defense.
but stated nothing different nom or
in addition to what was given Inv
Haley and Mccoy.
Mr.. Haley was recalled, and testi-
fed that Soine manuscript handed
him was a copy of the notice OF loca-
ton posted on the Richmond mine.
Llewelen DlviS testified further
to circumstances which occurred dur.
ing the early history of the mines,
but TO nothing specially interesting
besides.
Defendants offered in evidence the
following deeds and papers Deed
rom Thos. Ev ms to Edward Creek
er, eXecut d June 1lth, 1870; deed
from CrOcker to Mccoy, September
9th, 1870 trust deed from w. G.. Me-
Coy and others, to the Richmond Min
ing Company, February 9th. 1871 ::
Richmond Mining Company to J. NJ.
English, September LIST, 1871 ; j. NJ.
English to Richmond Mining Conn
pany (limited), October 23d, 1871
ri :hmonI Mining Company to K. A.
Fisher, April I'd, 1872 &; X. A. Fisher
to Clarence King, December 18th, 1872 ;
Clarence King to Richmond Mining
Company of Nevada, March LIST, 1873;
and Sundry powers of attorney and
certificates OF incorporation.
Patrick RoSSetter was the next wit
ness introduced by the defense but
what he said is hardly of sufficient in
tereSt to be put IN type. He was asked
some question about which side of
the monument the work was done,
WEen the Court remarked that a no
tlce upon Il ledge, claiming Il number
or its linear feet, would be made sulli-
GENTLY distinctive as to Which direc-
ton from the initial point the ground
was claimed, by the side OF the mon
ument upon which the work was
done.
Court adjourned at a quarter to l
o'clock, to meet at 2 o'clock p. NJ.
After assembling at 2 o'clock, plain
tiffS asked Il recess of m hour. in or
der that they might further look at
the papers introduced in evidence at
the morning session by the defend
ants. Recess reluctantly granted.
Judge Mckenny is anxious that pro-
ceedlngS go on as eXpedltiou>ly as
may be, in order to relieve the jury as
soon as possible from their unpleas-
ant situation of being isolated from
almost everybody. His heartfullness
is best appreciated by the jurymen.
After The hour for recess had
elapsed, all were soon again i'll place
and proceedings resumed.
Mr.. WeScott was recalled and en-
gagged the attorneys tie remainder of
the afternoon III questioning him
more particularly about the Seolo9i-
Cal characteristics of Ruby Hill ; but
no material deviation from the facts
of his evidence as above given was
made.
At 4 o'clock, a motion to adjourn, on
account of the defense not being well
able to proceed further then, caused
his Honor to intimate a desire o
night sessions. Mr.. Wren said he
thought one more day would be all
the time they would want in which
to make their case, as they had but
four more witnesses To introduce.
Adjourned at 4 o'clock, to meet at 10
o'clock this morning.