New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-05-29
COURT RECORD.
WEDNESDAY, MAY Is. 1873.
Supreme Court.

The following Criuion was delivered by Justice
No. 40. Comm issiorers Of Emigration ve. Z. L.
Brandt.-The plaintiffs sue the master. owners and
consignees st the steamship Saxon!a :Or the pen.
atty OF violation OF Revised Statutes. l.2z. COM
pel.ing them to make report OF name age ma
IoL atty condition. etc. of every passenger. The
steamship Sa1onla landed !s4 ajen p@ssenGtia
defendant answers that tine act is mercy d1rec'
tory; tina, it is unconstitutional that i conflicts
with article IA CT the constitution: that it is re.
pugnant 70 sections eight and ten OF article one.
constitution Of the United States.
The court below decided that tie Jaw was mop
e-atve. It did 10: Pass or the money demand Of
SEQ for each passenger. We concur with the
Judge quo tie matter OF bonds. Il An. 2G7.
constitution Of tEe Emitted States. The State law
n question is Lot a regulation OF commerce be.
tween foreign nations. b.: a poi:ee reg uatlon
State may make such . provision ior the protec e.
ton OF :ts own citizens. how" '1J: 1e !e.ers.
How. Al.
Ordered. :ha. tie r,air.iff recover from defend.
ants the pela.:y Claimed IN the sam Ct s lo,sto.
AfREAs:NGs RYFrsEp.
30. Ss3l. Joseph vei,anc VS.. Louis Sc. German.
No 2sos. Phi!.bert Rogay vs.. ). NJ. .uilard and
Louis Schneider.
No 1929. E. Newman / CO. rs. John Smoker e al
No. .iss. Jean Bapt!ste IecLe We. ). 3. Arthur
No 2844. NJ. n. Radwich vs.. A. H. siewerd ct FL.
No. 2s6s. Herman Job Frank HeueI.
No, 1855. African Methodist Episcops! Church vs..
No 1854. John R. weatherby VS.. Mrs. Asemia
No 800. Patrick irwin .s James NJ Peterson.
No 15s9. James Q. ieatman VS.. Louisiana State
Bank.
No 2aos. \. Semple Ycung vs.. Scot. {. az.
No. ST.. NJ. a. southworth VS.. city Of New Or.
leans
No 2774. Mazu,cor Hernen vs.. ". H. Mcrsac
30 ,s5, succe.s:o on Of Widow De Grehar.
No 1890. Bank Of New Orleans VS.. Z. L. Milan
don ard J. u Lapeyre.
No 45ii. State I Z rel J. T. Michel vs.. Der jauin
No 45c.. Victor Mausin ct al. vs.. Charles Smith
tax collector OF Ascension parish.
Ne. 4s7'. Succession OF Milton Taylor.
No. 1862. a. Mltxnbe1ger 20. W. H. Keys.
No. 1850. y. }. ROsenthai Us. Louis Meyers.
No. 3s51. Jean Antoine 5scop vs.. city Of New Or
leans.
No. A5ls. stat. -s rel. Recorder CT Mo,tgage.,s.
Charles Clinton, State Auditor.
No 1868. State VS. Oscar Burns.
No. 46Ii. Auguste and Leandre Chevs! 70. 81.
Leon Destez.
No. $3.50. a. LartIgua vs.. ETA White.
No 29lS. Same VS. same.
No. 443.. City of Baltimore vs.. Henry Parlsnse
No. 1901. Dexter G. Hitchcock vs.. Southern Paw
ing COMPANY.
sNo. 344s. Felix A. Duc1c., executor. vs. Edward
Gottsctalk.
No. 2eaI. Columbia E:Ie Company No. ; vs..
Joseph A. Purcell ct al
No. 1926. IoseIi !iue Hale executg.s. V. William
). Sa.teT e al.
Superior District Court.
Patrick Irwin ct al. city of New C.,eans.-
Rule taken by plaintiff made absolute. The sher-
if ordered TO seize and dis:rain the revenues Of
the c.ty until the Judgment be satisfied.
First District Court.
state 50. Pierre Bertiu.-Breakng and enterin:
dangerous weapon. Verdict not guilty. Accused
remanled to avail. trial on other charges
state We. Charles Predes."e.-Assauit ard bar.
ts1y. Verdict not guilty