New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-12-09
COURT RECORD.
MONDAY, DECEMBER s, 1873.
United States Circuit Court.

| United States Circuit Court.
| Before Hon. f. II. Durell district judge
John COchrane, receiver, vs.. National
Park Bank. of New York.-On motion OF
the defendants plaintiff is ordered to show
| cause why payment of 100000 rendered
on notes of B. & j. Leman, for S45. 600 held
| by defendants, should not be received
| John Cochrane vs.. F. Schuchardt. Same
VS.. National Park Bank, of New York.
Same VS.. L. Schneider ct al Defendants
are ordered to show cause why a receiver
| should not be appointed.
Pointevant & Fare vs. Carondelet and
Carrollton Railroad CoDpany.-Judgment
Tor S5S0S 81, with interest and costs. Or
dered, that the road, its property, rails,
ties, etc, be sold by r. H. Shannon, master
in chancery, and the debt satisfied ont of
the proceeds.
Supreme Court.
Adjourned to Monday, December Is, when
opinions will be read.
Superior District Court.
The following have been filed:
State Of Louisiana vs. Richard Taylor
The report of the experts appointed by the
court to examine the condition of the work
on the New canal was filed to-day.
On motion of counsel for the State, the
court granted an order sequestrating the
property of the New canal, and appointing
a receiver, who will be named tomorrow.
Crescent City Live Stock Landing and
Slaughterhouse Company VS.. John Laur-
rehabilitation sets forth that defendant
has slaughtered in the parishes of ST. Ber-
nard, Orleans and Jefferson 1873 head of
cattle and other animals, mourning pen
atty of $3.50 for each; that he has landed
1873 head of cattle at other places than the
wharves OF the company, mourning penalty
of $3.50 for each; that ne has occupied
building as slaughterhOuse in the Fifth
District of New Orleans, and slaughtered
1873 cattle in it, incurring a penalty of 500
for each; all in violation of plaintiffs char
ter, wheretor plaintiff prays for Judgment
for $4,000, and an injunction restraining
said defendant from using said building as
slaughterhouse, and from killing, etc,
cattle in the parishes named. Injunction
issued on bond of $500.
C. E. Girardey va. Nicholas j. Hoey and
John H. O'Ccnnor.-Petitioner alleges a
partnership between him and defendants
and a sale of his interest to Hoey, with the
knowledge of O'Connor; that he gave
written notice, according to contract, to the
parties August and October ], 1873, aud
by publication; that notwithstanding this,
defendants have carried on the business in
petitioners name. though plaintiff remOn-
strated; that they knew OF the intention of
petitioner to go into the same business in
his own name; that they have refused to
style themselves as ''successors;' that this
course is intended to prevent him from en-
tering into business; that he has suffered
damages to the amount of $4,000, and
prays for an injunction restraining defend
ants from using the name of c. Z. Girardey
in any business since October |, 1873, with
out styling themselves successors. 1riunc-
ton issued on bond of $500.
Francis B. Flietas VS.. Charles Cavaroc 81
Son.-November %, defendants on writ
T. a. II = n
barrels mOlasses belonging TO petitioner,
which he bonded in the sum of $500. De-
cember |, defendant by writ from district
court OF St. Bernard, seized the crops Of
petitioners plantation made in 1873. which
he bonded in the sum of $4,000. Petition
alleges the two suits to be for the same
cause Of action tor S 600; that December
,, defendants by writ from the Sixth Dis
trict Court, seized twenty five barrels mo-
lasses OF petitioner. which he bonded for
$500; that December 4, by writ from the
district court of st. Bernard, defendants
seized the same property that they had
previously seized by writ from the same |
court, which petitioner again bonded tor
$4,000: that the suits are the same; that |
defendants have already seized property |
exceeding their claims; that notwithstand- |
ing this fact. defendants are preparing |
papers to seize the same property again. |
Petitioner invokes the protect on If the |
court and fears defendants will ruin him if |
they are not arrested in these unlawful pro-
reedings. Wherefore an Injunction is |
prayed for restraining defendants from |
making anv other seizures upon the prop |
erty bonded
Injunction issued on bond of $500.
First District Court.
ARRAIGNED.
Bigamy = Victor Eoght. Plea of not |
guilty.
SOLLE PROsEQU1 ENTERED.
State VS., Kate Hall-Larceny.
SENTENCED.
State VS.. Aleck Harrison-Assault and
battery. Two days in Parish Prison or pay
,osts OF prosecution.
State VS.. Z. P. Ducloslange-Assault
md battery. twenty-five dollars or one
lay in Parish Prison.
State IS. George Jackson-Carrying a
oncealed weapon. Two days il Parish
Prison or pay costs.
on TRIAL.
State Va. Thomas and Mrs. Mallov -
knowingly receiving stolen goods. Jury
ut.
Sixth District Court.
Mutual National Bank VS.. John Rotge ct
ls.-On trial. This case will probably in
olive some points relative to the legal con-
truction of certain rules of the Clearing
louise.