The Rutland daily globe. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1873-1877, 1873-12-20

mcnt and that all the funds in the hands
of the supposed trustees had accumulated
since the receipt by them Of said notice
and were due and payable to the petitioner
a. such receiver and manager.
1t further appeared that the Vermont and
Canada railroad company was chartered by
the legislature Of this state that its rail-
road is within the state that three of the
seven directors of said company and its
clerk were residents of this state and that
the charter of said company requires that
the office of clerk of the corporation shall
he kept in this state. And it appeared that
there vas due to the petitioner from the
supposed trustees, At the time they were
summoned as such trustees the sum of
S115, 2S1, all of which sum, except about
300 600, was due from the petitioner to
connecting roads. That in consequence of
being summoned rs aforesaid, said trustees
refused to pay over ;hc balance due to the
petitioner, and hence the petitioner was UNI
able to meet its obligations to connecting
roads and other obligations which it was
under a. such receiver and manager, and
had been put to great trouble and expense
in procuring means with which to meet the
necessary expenses of operating said roads,
and that the only means it had for paying
said operating expenses were from the i'll
come on salu Tod"s, lISe pHti"h u
Whlcli income was ColiccH' from Sai" COR
"iutiohs an" s'',' N'arh' sHU'io"Vu az
trustees h't uluer ''ic system Oh uoln8
p"N'ncsS UP" ~ t',"'9 "''o' '"c 'n"h'sr-
I'.n' V' 'iG Peut,"e', ""'' "nVr ip''9
WIN whom we pet'V"i. "'9 "'S'ii's' con
nccions the corporation delivering the
freight collects the entire charges for lis
transportation and divides the same be-
tween the roads over which il has been
transported ana 'hut II Is Hecea7a|y 10
PIoii'u'ic usG Ol we I"a'S ulucr inc n!''
"senigiit VI 'le el'i'"''' '''' TINS system
shn,liu nc con- ln"e"'
lhe7e were the i.a'P'al ldc's upon "hlch
,lC pcUt'o!ict PicV,cd'cd us i!Hht 20 .i!c IT.,
i,ci Pa! Z" i"'' nv PC''''uVS CInlilcu
,iut elc lc"cPl,lcI was ""' ch''lieu ~ IT,
ItI; lor '.G io'io"'nS reasons
fHSt ne pc'iliohc' VchIea mat the pc'-
uohcl Is uuly "'E'hizc' corporation puI-
suant 10 rs ch7rIeF' or mat IL uuly or
S'tnlAcd' II l. competent 10 be receiver IN
sail cause.
mere was no evidence oiler'u rearing
upon the AuoJect Ht''er OF inns ooJect"h,
cNVcP' ''e Icco'u no"'e reieFic" 70 anu
"nGh parry Ir"uuces INC W0peT Fec0|u
cNluchcc 81 HIS appointments lhat cNluence
Is conclusive OF ms H@h' un'ii II IS I'M
leacheu. ana II ms ,eeh hcl'i lnat II was
''''ti ID. ti,.'. ,nu "i'Ei "llolnuns -
.c,'.I - 81 '1no"Ua ~ 'niiHl"' VI "uh,''
no. 10 nav 'acn '','''e-MilIic II Is sun.
sisei's "I.eL i. ~ nv, oo,,llcoenI 10. any,
une W. lh'crlGic WIN .lp l"i9'cssloi. VI 'nc
iGceNJr, or' ~ l,aiiS ictis mssrieteu ~
1' u.! W. t".i '''u
ne n,i' :,,s'''"'' l''p'i P''''''is' 'o.'o''
Russell " East ANGLICAN Railway connony.
81 Mac and g. III: AmeS v Berkpnhpad Docks
2)h Bsav 853'
l,',I III. ,lo 800. ,;,.,,,,,. I1 49,, ll
Gt'""U Ii'' 'ic 'c'''"'ci Hi.' II" ieSdi
right unucr It's appointment To take pos
session of the pctitiOncc'S prOpertv.
Tbis objection involves mivcj ounstion
ms ~ ''.'' ~ 49, >" iG1a''oi
Oh law anu TACT anu upon INC question on