The weekly Arizona miner., 1873-05-24

Crozicr and S. Bogar. Indictment read tO tle jury and the following witnesses examined for the prosecution John Grennar, Gee. Morris, Dr. Jos. Lescsnc, Daniel smith, Jas Maguire, Henry Hardy Dr. Guildersleeye and Jos Gideon. Prosecution rested The following witnesses for defense were examined: Thomas Nicks and defendant. Testimony here closed Prosecution moved to dismiss the trial, discharge the jury, and submit the case again to the grand jury, as the testimony now adduced proved a higher crime 10 be committed than charged in the indictment. Oycrrulcd by tie Court.
 Cause opened for the jury by ]. M Mur phy for the prosecution, followed by W. C. 1 Blakely for the defense, and closed by X. E. . Davis, special district attorney.
 The jury having been charged by the | Court m writing, retired, and, after due de- liberation, returned into Court and, in pres ence of prisoner and respective counsel, re- turned the verdict following: We Inc jurors find Inc defendant guilty as charged in Inc indictment
 (s,gucd) A J. MoonE, Foreman. Territory of Arizona ys. Patrick T. Laney. Ordered that Sheriff bring defendant into Court on saturday, May 10th, at 10 o'clock A. N., for sentence.
 ] Adjourned until tomorrow at 9 A. N. Court met Friday, May 9, A. D. 1878, at ! 70 A. N.--On motion, (and upon exhibiting certificates of admission in the Court of : Chanoery ot the State of New York, and of the Fifth Judicial District Court of tue State of California and the necessary oath being aiministeredl George E. Young was duly admitted as an attorney and counselor of this Court.
 Territory of Arizona ys. Joseph Spearing - Now on this 9th day of May, 1873, deien- dant appearing in court with his counsel, J. M. Murphy Esq; on motion of defendants counsel that defendant be admitted to bail, not being charged with capital crime, the court ruled that defendant be admitted to bail in the sum of S2, 800.
 Indictment being read to defendant, he pleaded not guilty.
 Wm. Burch vs. Lovely Bros.-cause dis missed for want Of prosecution. Judgment for respondent.
 E. H. Spear ". Geo. II. Dakin-cause dis missed by request of counsel.
 John DUling vs. l.. q. Welbourn-appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Judg- ment for respondent.
 NJ. McWiiiams vs. II. F. Baker-contin- ued for want of service.
 M. Burns vs. Adolphe Peze-appeal dis missed at request of appellant.
 A. c. Haskell vs. W. II. Hardy-motion for judgment on pleadings and objections raised 10 filing amended answer, taken under adyisement by the court.
 Court stood at recess.
 Grand Jury appeared in open court and re- ported two bills of indictment found for grand larceny; one against -, and -, neither of them being in custody.
 Charles Murray vs. W. W. Dodge--motion to set aside the order of the court comInis- sioner, oyerruled. Plaintiff allowed until to- morrow morning to file undertaking for costs.
 D. J. Canty ys. II. F. Baker-submitted on stipulation.
 X. L. Moeler vs. Mix & Niles--motion to continue-atfidsvit filed.
 Court adjourned until Saturday, May 10th, 1873.
 Court met Saturday, May 10, ls73.-Terri- tory of Arizona vs. Patrick T. Laney-motion for stay of proceedings to prepare affidavit for new trial. Affidavit read and filed, motion ovenuled. Notice of appeal given.
 This 18th day the prisoner appearing in court of judgment, and having been informed of the nature of the indictment, his plea, and the verdict of the jury, was asked by the court if he had any legal cause to show why judgment should not be pronounced against hlrn, answered 'that he had been convicted before he came into court.n Court then pro- Doubceu the IOLOWlng Juustnent. 'lt IS con sidered and adjudged, and the judgment of the court IS, that you, Patrick T. Laney, be removed hence 10 the county jail, or other place of secure confinement, and there se- curely kept until the day hereafter to be fixed for your execution, and on that day you be hanged by the neck, until you are dead"
 Territory of Arizona vs. Adam Wiley-or- dered that prisoner be sentenced on Monday, May l2th, at 9 a. m.
 Territory of Arizona vs. Joseph Spearing affidavit for continuance read by plaintiffs counsel, and cause continued for the term. Territory of Arizona vs. Michael Dolan- indictment for drawing and exhibiting a deadly weapon, read to him. and allowed till Monday to plead.
 Territory of Arizona ys. Michael Dolan- indictment for an assault with deadly weap- on, read to him, and allowed till Monday to plead.
 Court stood at a recess until o'flock
 The Grand Jury appeared and presented two indictments; one against -, for per. jury, and one against -, for resisting all ol- fceT.
 Grand Jury then presented their final re- port and were discharged by the court.
 Territory of Arizona ys. Jos. SpearBg- bond for s2,5OO approved by court, and de- fendant ordered to stand on said bond.