New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-03-19
TIE COURTS.
,,i..d S,,tes Circui, Court.

VI "
Defendant allowed thirty days % take les
tinOny. ,
Jaco, Sample .. = and =. J. McCr'-
iough e. a.. vs. steamer SOU-he!re!.-N
trial refused.
Knitted state. District Court.
William 4. ca. IS. Ball X Curtis
Judgmeu. fer plaintiff fov $500, interests
and costs, with mOrtgag" ana privilege Oh
Longy.ew plantation. II. James parrish
WING. Is ordered 70 be soi'..
Superior District Court.
In she case 81 joseph Hernandez {: ais.
rs. Charles Clinton, Auditor. etc. Amos
Morrison. OF the parish Q: Jefferson, ar0
L. n Fuller, residing IL East Baton Rouge
have fled petition OF intervention. AheJ
claim to be entitled 20 - per .!em as
clerks OF IL. Enrolment Commute" OF ne
Legislature. End Chrt. per CENT atnI1iota4
under act No s. o: iS1,5. ana pray :.."' .ue
Injunction oe dissolved
In the case o: Howard, Simmons u 60.
v. New Orleans Printing and Publishing
Company, Subpoena "nces !tcn" was is7I".
hy order q. tie c0!rt. commanding ny.
Warren B-,cke!l, president OF the New Jr
lean. Publishing and Printing C0lLpanS'to
produce IN court tie minutes OF the BOARD
Of directors OF The New Orleans Printing
and Publishing CompaE: Oh tie t"tn,:e'H
instant.
Accommodation Bank VS.. = {. Nahar.-
Suit for money loaned Oh collatera. secn-
ritv, The Lefendai.: borrowed St"'j tr0i!
plaintiff. depOsitlng a. security SIX S'a-t
warrants for $1,000 each, E.ty SHARES o!
stock in the Loan Association, and lis note
for ..3j and alleges IA bls answer tHat ne
has rendered the tBI. amount due he plan
iii, and has been refused the ie.HTn I. :it
securities deposited. On tEiai.
second District Court.
S,,o,.eeio,, of Pierre MODp--e The Ipei-
ZION of Julian Joseph MOEette lrays tnat
m, be recognized as sole helT ana denies
The legitimacy OF Edward No1et-e. rs
brother. who lied plea OK estop!".. MAJ
ing the following points:
]. That after having accepted We 'er":,
and status conferred upon him hT The iatr
Pierre Nonette and Louise B0u!ir lie ca.
n,- attack the ac. creating his own >tatGs.
:. That having ratified and ac.Nlesce.. Il
the proceedings OF the succession. re cal
not attack the same.
=. That after having acknowledged II"
legitimate status o. his brother. 'he re
spoudent. and having acGuiesced N .Ee
same he can no. attack the sad status.
That the acs creating the status Ot
both the plaintiff and defendant il common
| 10 both, and neither can attack the sad act
after having voluntarily executed :He sane.
That the aCkno wiedgneE. Of The status
Of the Gsiendan. by the pla.n'ir II ar
| authentic &c! - i perpetual! bar 20 ;E!s &C
| ton.
Judge Tisrc- Las rendered a decision s':s
| tanning the plea ,f es+oNpe'. and "".."rrG
| Judgment II iavoT of Edward MoEe-te an.
| against the petitioner. with costs.
The viii Ot the LATE G. II. SlocoMh las
been admitted to prcraye. /. contains hpt
! Two prcvis.ons-oCe 0. $4,000 20 be ex-
! pended in souvenirs FOR prese ItaNon 20
such friends as his wite's judgment may
| elect, and one berIeathlng 70 his H%"ghtt.,
T aged eleven. al the property. real and per
| s0ral. Of which he died possessed, ano ap-
pointiny his widow eytcItr!y and .utT!&.
tn. succession OF Thomas Green l"s oe.a
| opened IL This court.
Fifth District Can't.
| n ..a case 0. Tricoa -. Ncnand' :. I.l:,
! Cull0m has rendered 81 opinion. which. re
| side involving very interesting point
| touching the responsibility o: suTe..cs III
| bonds, is further interesting. because -
decree Is IL Notwithstanding 20 one IL q
similar case rendered Uy he supreme Court.
! The court says:
, FOR T. rule taken yH one Ecrie. ~ he sure : =
on defendants bond. il az attachment pro
| c.eGing against his property. :. ,ho" c"uS'-
| why he should Hu. nc IeoT4cu :" -:.'-st" ..i.t.
| nav til. Judgment rendered agalL>' -.t NJ Z
Lez. Their. being found 10 property be.p: =
ing 20 .he latter. te.lre answers '.!..t :.e =
IL h' so go " 80" - - ,'-,,7",.,
."- ....,1,.,1,,+ 49, =. ,.t',r,,
, ~ j;,s.,.
~ II: -, ,.I,.. -,-,.,,, na-.r a. .-.
tome. which VS. baSeu upon .he .-til";.t :
ia Quinn -. N.v.s, : T., ..3. Il mich ne
court / ED .hat he -,ving ~ {. nnG.. = -
waiver Of a parry : .-h's (" SO" ma. ~"
~. .,",..5',,; Nv ~. .ha ,:.I,er.,
a+.ac;,eI 0,.. no. e,nrg 10 ne de. tn.aut.
d. .SI." 80. -. ,,n.. a,nye ~.
,as,,,ro-,bar .t;..i,,,5iar.o me .,re,.D. cas-
80, ,1'I-r. 49,.
,,a, ;as,r..,. ,;~es how'd az,
NJ VIZ "a 49,; 49,.
| ,3nn,,, 50. ,,..- h.. -, ~ ron
;a.,I o.. s,,.i,'., is ,..r,;,.i sbolIla i. q:
=, ~, 80 =. ,c-.r 50. ~, s;-v cIa5,r ~ III,
:" 40 80. ~ ,o> ~ '.n -, 20 ,, Wv
.eedinrs .aa,n.. MeaerJez % 20 o. O..
au.n.
He stands nov II the Ign % arv ORD:
nary surety IN such cases. AID s.r.iG 20
escape from lie iianl!irv.
| weld with .ntei -uea difference ani
, Measure 10 -Le SUPERIOR opinion o: he Sd
nreme Court, Whenever they are IL acccrt
win rreca9er+. or sustained hv ktron.
reasons. but when i appears ccrc!ltsiyci,
70 my mind that i has overlooked SUI king
discrepancies " material facts and when
see no narticrIar m!sche. Is lik.lr 20 fol
! low 20 the Geteu.!ac. IN hi. rule. ! belle"
:, !. NV f;.-v 10 decide accord 70 - ",
own convictions ii VIVA: lie "a: : G...e
srch .+a-a 81 f,r.s.
IL NY or,;,:or re .n-.. nr.e.' II B2u.
- Antoine. ana 90 rot fee! f.ou?a ahsg
luteIv ny thar sir-le decision. Inc at.tnor
inv ~ which interior :.!"cL".s re 20 -
,.or.r,eG :. No. 60 rr,Ir5 r.e.a .s !. : pria
ciole. See R..iu..'s Frs. Book O.: ne La ..