Pioche daily record. [volume] (Pioche, Nev.) 1872-1876, 1873-04-15

thing as Mammoth, No. 3, and III t sould
extend TO the western bound q ne
company's actual ross ssion; | snow all
about tie acquisition of the Monitor title;
it was worked by G. Gu 'tpu and
O'Neale; found that it would trouble
some, and was negotiating witt hem for
the purchase; all they asked W $1,000;
found that Hearst had snapped mp, and
advised Lightner TO secure 1t 70 -, 900.
and thought they were getting rid of a
formidable trouble; didn 'tknoW Hearst
coming here before his arrival; lere was
no arrangenIe mt between he ant /; l con-
veyed my interest to Hearst bout the
25th OF September 1871; first cor versation
with Hearst concerning the Hermes title
was after the purchase of the Monitor
ground; McCannon, Lightner and myself
agreed to convey all our interests in the
Hermes; l agreed to put in 100 feet;
Hearst put in the Monitor; McCannon
O. A; one full share was reserved for
Colonel Raymond if he would come in
and convey the Box title; McCannon was
| to have 5000 shares and convey the Mon
ltor title; Hearst was to have !, 600 shares,
Lightner 5000, and 5000 TO be sold for
working expenses.
The Court then adjourned until 2
o'clock p. m.
AFTERNOON SESSION.
Examination of D. W. Perley resumed,
In which he denied that he had made
the declarations testified to by Nj. Ho!-
land and ID. Wilkin, witnesses on behalf
of the plaintiffs.
DISCRIMINATION became at
torney for the Raymond & Ely company
in March 1871; can't say investigated
the Panaca title; saw the Pana,a notice
at Bulionville in the summer Of 1870;
took copy of the notice; John Ely
asked Ashley and myself to look at the
matter as he suggested he might want
assistance; Ashley was my partner ther
and Ely wished Ashley to look at the
Panaca notice; l saw there Box, Van
denmark and Howard Livingston; We had
a general talk; know that the Raymond
& Ely company claimed some of the
Panaca ground; Col. Raymond told me
, that he had title; that he had 500 fee
superficial east and west by virtue of the
location; | told him he hadn't rom tn,
I notice; Colonel Raymonds idel was tina
he had square location and th Il he hat
1 a right to any ledge within those limits
5 / represented to him that the motto,
j; claimed ledge and that he had no RICH
t to anything by virtue of the square loca
Z; ton; it was in Dec. 1871: think it j
+ very possible that Colonel Raymond tolt
e me that he would not go into the Hermes
I Here the notice of tie PanAca CLAIM
e was submitted to the witness, who insist
: ed that it was q nuliity l didn't wis
Q to locate for the Hermes or anything tn
y Raymond 4 Ely claimed; the Lightne
; ledge had trend east and west; did nc
/ suppose the Panaca had a conflict wit
Q it; | think that when man locates
IS ledge he can follow it even if he is mis-
u taken in the supposed direction; consio
e err it n claim on the ledge on the Panac
q claim; | don't think that if he mistake
81 the course that divests his rights; the
10 located north and south ledge an
e think they have got one now.
IS The witness was further cross-examil
o ed at a considerable length, but unto
70 tunately we have not room for the fu
n details. After Mr.. Perley left the stan
q Mr.. p. McCannon was called and e
l. amined, after which the Court adjourne
10 to this morning at ten O'Clock.