New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1873-01-28
TWEED'S BANK ENTRIES.
MIR. Tn.DENs TABLES UTILIZED.


yesterday was exceedingly monotonous the time being
spen IN citations Of figures from Mr. Tdcns tables re-
laiing the bank accounts 81 Tweed GafVeF' "oou-
ward, and Ingerso. Mr.. Tilten occupied the Witness
stand al day. and the crosse Examination particularly
kent the entire court amused with his pertnacious
explanations Of what he plainly Insisted would be mis-
construed and unfair the court and jury without
them Mr.. Tden did not arrive until nearly IL O'Clock
TO complete his testimony begun Friday That testi-
mony was in brief this Taking up particular warrant
of any OF the great Courthouse contracts except Key
ser whose warrants passed directly 10 Mr. WOodwards
account check was found debed 1.-THE bank account
of the mau deposited that warrant. and deposit
of exactly that amount found in Mr. WOODWARD
bank account; Mr.. Woodwards total deposit for uaS
was often the aggregate several such deposits anu
sometimes had, besides, other amounts added Du nv
was always deOited TO Mr.. woodwardS account cne0A
by him. and on the same date credit OF tue eAau'
amount of woodwards check was found IN MI A"oouS
account.
When Mr. Tnden stopped Friday, i've OF the war
rants in the indictment had not been traced "heh he
resumed the stand the examination ran suoS'au'iS "
follows: .. go cDvD,r
N rook NJ warrant No. s5O5 10 the order OF Andrew
Garyey 10 the amount Of sisss9 So, and warrant No.
7 amounting to slsI9 70, and Endorsed by lngerson
&C. find similar items to tho credit OF lngerson
Co as deposited by them on the same day; ma on
the same day debit 70 Ingersoh Co. OF sl2l'O W.
on the same day there is debit 10 woodward Oh
ssss9 49, On the day there is credit for that
exact amount 10 Mr.. Tweed's account. Warrant NO
37s3 is for &2224 9Sa Keyser warrant-wheh appears
dreotly in Woodlands account. There is debit
that day to woodwards account of s26569 80,
which amount appears as a credit on MI
Tweed's account Warrant No. $3.50 is Garyey
warrant for s72O75 0S appearing to his credit lie
is debted that day with $47,Tl4 6S, which appears
ON woodwards account. On the same day IpgersOn's
account is debted with $l963 81, which appears as
a credit Woodward. The day there is debit to
Woodward's account Of N7.57S IS, which amount APP
pears in Mr.. Tweed's account credit. Garvey
warrant No 1913. appears "a deposit in IngersoWs
for SsCs 81 There are other deposits OF that
dav TO ugcrsOl Co. They debited with Sl2l4l o.
which appears credit in Woodward's account
Woodward is debited with Sl5I45 81, sum which ap-
pears that date credited TO Mr. Tweed warrant 20
7O6s 50 and No. $500 is Keyser warrant IN
dorsed the firm for s5S6S5 C6 they Gotn appear
90 ar. dcbted with S6573 81 SLIGO 30 and $S46S 80
amounts appearing Woodwards account on the credit
side; Mr. WoOdwards account of that day shows debts
Tor $S7 &c aud sl63 TO- sums which appear as credits
ON Mr.. Tweed's account
Mr. Tldens examination was suspended moment to
allow Mr. Smith TO expOund the meaning Of entries on
the debit cash book He explained that from them he
could tell whether a check the bank was paid over
the counter by the teller received from customer of
TONER'S account He went over number Of the items
already named and declared them 70 DE cneek UL moOT
equivalent items paid by the paying teller lie also IeS
tifed that he examined the deposit tickets win MI III
den He explained Mr. Field that he did not receive
the deposit tickets himself but his assistant handed
them TO him He did not know that the deposit tick
cts were forged before they him. He saw the
checks but did not know the SIGNATURES 70 them that
70 him Of forgery.
THE ACCOUNTS FOOTED UP
Mr. Tlden then resumed: The sum total Of Mr.. Tweeds
deposits in the Broadway Bank from May to Sept l.
1870 was, according the books and deposit tickets
Mr. Field objected that this calling for the con-
tents improved papers The Court Overrued the OBJ
S9 Gg 1e qg s6 wa eS oa tbs nv results were
derived from the deposit tickets, and then verified
Mr. Tweeds deposits whole year, aud have sep
araee Mr. Tweed's account for that period Every de-
ST Mr. Smith and MI Rhodes 1t makes the aggregate
Of MI Tweed's deposits for that period sl,2s5,-
45S 81. OF tins the portion corresponding NO 10
Tlden here here gave '' each woodward deposit
from May g. and each other deposit in Mr. Tweeds ac
raetng the four items which were not proved in bis
previous examination rne moTuTSlu et 10 VOL
wards the period is $3,6396s 80 The
County Liability Warrants is siO3375O Sc. The
corresponding 10 debts on IDgersol Co.'S account Is
rom COUNTY sbtIes rs s. $50 6os SS: the other items
are sG2 20 one item IN that OF $3.50 10 was probably
TIE next question was in relation to Garveys deposits
during the same period. Mr.. Tiden, his imperative
way, which brought out laugh, glanced up at the
6arvey accounts now" As it about O'Clock Judge
Davis slnllngy acquiesoed, and a recess was taken
RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION.
Mr. Tiden was asked, after recess, what were the
total deposits OF Ingersou Co. for tho time he had
been speaking Of. He replied: 81 have made no such
statement for that time, but noticed bookkeepers
footing giving them the first date balance OF SO5OO
Garvey's credits in the Broadway bank for the same
time balanced at the beginning OF the PERIOD
his deposits were in round numbers. N47S0OO OF this
the deposit OF warrants were nl77,4lS ~" ,
Mr.. Tlden then summarized the result OF MS exam
ipaton thus: Wherever debit Of &C per cent appears
on the warrants deposited Ply Garyey there appears 20
Der cent on the the credit of Woodward ac
count and the debit side Of WOodwards account an
entry of per cent the warrant and wherever
that sum of "a per cent on the warrant appears as
debit in woodwards there appears credit IN
Tweed's aceOun, of the same sum exactly and amount
ing "a cent OF what appears on the lace Oh
the warrant deposited by Carney"
During Mr. Tlden's examination large number or
warrants not the foundation OF any count Oh the
Indictment but issued under Board of Audit warrants
ana E ntS %ooIWard credit Of the same day and
sary 20 explanation. were offered In evidence Dut
Mr. Tdens direct examination Judge Davis suggested
that that point should be decided, and aeeordngy the
objections OF the defense were presented. Ihey were
substantially that the only pertnency OF the evidence
TO show independent crimes ngt c0nIe'fH P yydc
ment and that this virtually eVloenee aS 70 Ine
criminaIty-a course which was forbidden by the law
Iu other words though be ried for So OUT OF lgo
alleged he could be convicted On the other
1855, and then be retired on any one OF them
KEEN QUESTIONS BLUSTLY ASswERED
The cross-examinatioh then begun by Mfr. Field
who the the defense closed, leaped to his feet
and proceeded loudly and rapidly as follows:
O. Are You counsel for the people in these prosecutions
against Mr. Tweedf A. No, Sir
O. Did you argue at Albany the suit brought against
@ DID You swear to affidavit upon which Mr. Tweed
was arrested In SlOCOOO! A. Yes s'I' ..oo,. ,.o..
O. You argued as counsel for the peoplei A. argued
Q, a. counsel for the peoplei A Yes, Sir
q Did you as counsel attend before the Grand Jury In
respect various indictments against Dir. Tweed A.