The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-02-21

edge which Mr. Chase had Of the law incredible that
he could have made an admission Of fact which might
\: Gne. s,asDss Ss;S ne
2s2 + :. ss
the other hand ssntensn the defendant. insists
msI Of
SS@ eed to Leave proyidence in June s with her
Saashe fos &s MARIA Sa jones' n and
ne ss mat
est dsughtsr with them that the proof trades the
% tie 1 and sssIf ne
ss died and ssq
Sw sss ns 81
june! and lived Win him here and abroad dur
Sas xls &c Il %y
ss.s 3
the her and
s sSsn for during PsrSs nearly Period ' re.
se sfs Win and
nSs f ne & she hs
mother she Sssosni.ed Mrs Jones' her and
as H. @ 1.
aS snS
S $
!6s lime when Ssaltss Yielded the decay incident
SS SS%S ss ss Eng NOSE .nss
.ss
Ss., .;ss Ss mat "a
hs ali s S @ S wen
inc Of a ha Sna Re ssa bsa S
FIesloye BsSa That Madame Jams his mother 4.
S NOR Sss any 81
Mr.
Of her life and attempted to make different dis
so4 ns S ss s sss ND
q The ana ey ai
,he 70 be drawn from 4 leave you to Judge
TIC
e. Sa eSh s Snds
Of human conduct and IN Conflict with the Whole tenor
hs sea @ 1ff nj %isAs Ts
e n en sa
% him. claims tn. III. conduct and d.ca
e credits that when approached ne subject by Mr.
ss fi' 9
hs IF ne se@ h Ss M s' wU
@ min s sSa%e n m
ssappossd she was bis mShsr hs would have made
aS no nis + litigation '8 Sy Of
that his want Of confidence in The claim set SP
~ es sne
Af he %
testimony Of Joseph Perry, ,Perured witness. whose
ns
you Win rhs tsre s at
torneys as well as the interest OF the plaintiff In weigh
You have heard the statements Of the plaintiff in re-
S w Sc that G light lis the
s"ss: AND :n%
hs5r via s. w r
t5s S5Sqsh him iSTwsT$ ier ihs SSreSse q
ali the crsums ances which chataeterized that
whc IS Claimed Stated On that he knew !r
well when boy y and III he was grown up though not
n as how sS to %
+
@ q !ss
Ssf S f
he SfousS
that party knowing the chHracsr Of n testimony and
r. the Of and e
10 men 81 intelligence and interest in THO
% no saa t ee o OF this
sider their interest ana Conduct ana make such deduc
ton from the force OF their statements think just
the hays thu" 81 sG@s ts
70 he i AND
ing g your SSncs9n take into the whole
wholly upon the act whether or not he has proved to
ne urdpU nj iS n 10 q
satisfaction that he is her then he entitled TO
verdict If he has not you will return verdict for the
The
that viii nSi either
s Eas !is
claimed i which was asscsnase to her heirs But you
ne sfs
the plaintiff with the special finding added which have
stated II you find that fact in the NEGATIVE you will
THE VERDICT.
At halfpast twelve O'Clock the Jury retired to
consider their verdict. The jury consisted OF the
droth, Charles Lanier, Edward s. Jalrray, Henry
Bowers John Romerr- Abraham Bogardus, Joseph
Charles H. Mount, James Dodd. Exactly at two
O'Clock the Jury returned into Court.
Mr.. x. G. White, Clerk OF the Court, asked them
II they had agreed to a verdict.
Mr.. RistOn, the forema,l- We have, sir.
The Clerk-How do yeu Ind, gentlemen
Mr.. Riston-We find for the defendant. We fur
Their find the special fact that Eliza b. Jumel, at
the time OF her DEATH had no estate or interest IN
the lands claimed which were descendible to her
heirs.
The Judge thanked the jury for the great pa
thence they had exhibited and for the attention
they had bestowed upon the case. Owing to the
length OF time the trial had occupied they would
not again be called upon to do duty for two years.
The jury and the spectators then withdrew, and
thus has ended the great Jumel litigation.
A TERRIBLE DEATH.