The sun., 1873-03-01

IN tnit tnat TIE SAID Wtncheeter
pSa 81 Sss ,spS:'Sa Eses so;
kf kmy h9 po .s' 9Pssr % fSI the honsde q
been for the last twenty years notorious sbortonis
sS Go ss ss 1nd business were we'll
Second spceincation-That said Van Buskirk was
portion iSsTsci erS
and Snt to state sta prison and the nere. 9f society
asr
we 9s5 so%n &c ss :sS @
yct n nticr disregard Of his duty he abandoned the
ss her and ps wa. widely .dS.s
the same In the pubic press.
FORGERY AND MALrEAsASCl As COMMISSIONER
St,th Chdrge-wilful neelect Of duty and Inn
sfIi; spssiSsssiic2Tss. On the day
N that he forged the Charles Gebnry and eter
;:s:% e; IS 5
, q ,S. S SV"
ssp%S s demurrer. inter
s,ds.ssop ey the court we.e oyerrusd the '.ld Win
Kssnsa y saSn %e W.: 60 plead guilty q sns n @sds
ne ans s Mt, & S . S pS %
Is % ,s q q: sn,rss inc
Ss the ssd KcsOsn dd PLEAD sp 70 The %d, @
cease to further prosecute the said Indictment for
The said arrangement between said Brtton and said
~ hs and Ss.S G @
S Ss In court ne ',,d br'aoa gsse a. drss ne
ma and I,aa S 1 suss cases
MEMBER of Ss esq party tc was
d aeTS ss % % and . esoe oen % T. % and @ Hs
nd sn % ssyrr s9ye ~. nnsote es
600 fraudulent and nctous votes we're counted IN in
favor of said Winchester Brtton for the office Of DIS
IMPROPER cosprc-r OF THE rRtsH TRIAL
Seventh Chdrue. Grossly improper conduct.
First specncation-In thet he the said winchester
Rs9 nsTSs Gc asG nsSs 6e poee Of s
iiy Of BrooSyn not TO cal Ms wife wsose e.tmony
mpgGtaat upon the ,IiI Sj 'as inas,msnt % .gao', % y
ndictmcnt residing, Within the .,iurisdLction
that py Of sG improper
Ss M oeE from SeSn Srpqs1t q .aa S 81
the facts which Mrs. quick professed 70 know, that
TO all the facts SRgh Mrs. Quick profe,sed 10 kuow,
s5a know S %Ss. t'i 'fs S'n n'
S sTSn no. sd the oISSST, ns .oSn,l of Nor
.Ss soas fys Gr0P sS, g, e &
whole oi said in VIC alien Of the official
duy Of SAID wnchester Br.ton, and in gross violation
ssssaa sPssiaesIicS he ssls %lachs.,er Brit.
.%ss,.a q iS:iss; PsIS e xad5s~ Jasfsos
ssse
~ Oh behalf of the p 9sccuton. WHICH be did -,.,.
openly stated that Stoni the testimony OF said jack.
poi the psrts. ~ IA tri. sSe o,hef evidence was
| wholly insuiici Mt.
/ PROFANITY AND LACK OF DIGNITY AND FRO
| PttETf.
Eighth Chrrpe- Conduct leulsted TO bring he
administration of justice into contempt.
First Specification That the said Winchester Britton
upon sin qPoa proper ana leglf@.,s Safiness aPpsr
ana others that they might 20 10 hell ana has USED
Ioni aud ins1tnS langaagf % said psrle, ins.esd o
Sgy MD eo"e t"1s mai IN he ofec II When tSSy
werr interested, and about which they had ght TO %
second specincat'on-That before the trial of L. b
pr sence and hearing OF various parties that said Irish
was guilty he'll aud that he was bound 10 convict
lhird speciaeAtion--hat said winchester. Drttou
through power snd influence as district Attorns >
corrupt and imp oper purposes and has used the po~e
paS Of "I s e Ss asr:. e. Of m S .c
and his duty as District Attorney.
repeatedly ueed The power Of bis office TO shie hi,
xs sG pSn SS Who ss Sasa
contrary " the pa.he interest and his dnJ
bribery.
Ninth Chdrpe. bribery and corruption.
First specincauon-Thati In the month OF December
Supervisor. OF The county oi kings a communicated
aS sSsS 81 .yr be ps
70 the said Winchester brtton as plslret Attorney
pd TO % .sd ae Dstr,c, % Attorney Oe' Ana Tor ~
purpt 81 OF securing such increase OF salary, Ant
sSTs % ytte IN favor Of such increase of .Sisiy
bS a sFsHR s efS -ss1t saa
o a S 5 Bosr al ~ esTn sE sra. .ans
mon,y, with the intent aud upon the understanding
.aes @smSc q ns sapsTV.or 20 20
.ai.fy aud q isaSensc @ eOiraSly .Selr Sels action
ieeond specincstioa- in pursuance of SAID cor
rpP, agreement 50 .nIered into 6s.weea the sAis Win
shsssr ea1t2n. ps,riet Attorpey moresaid me ssl.
1p1sS a,d 0s "S'is r,son sosps s.
tsG annual ten nns
Ave hundred doilUrs. ,as "''' " '"' ANNUAL ''" VI my
whereio,e The said Winchester Britton In the mAnhe
afures d. has been guilty OF wnfu, deliberate, an
corrupt bribery.
OFFICIAL ooRRUrrIoS.
Tenth hChsrgs.-Conuption In once.
First spseiaeaton.In tals that The sad winshsste
dis ss.,ssi :aa y y, s.
q sSs Re as :S s. .sa sss s
influence District As,9rnsy II rs.aai1g sa6So weIc
ansas % H,
sSa a sGt51ES 5 e. Ss sss's and
!ss parties aaa 10 coISe ss sSess s
dlseoIge the money Obtained by fraud and did pro
sSTs I ann ri, ssf in Ss
aS 70 % .sS sSrSP .sss snS an. Dc
who hsd committee pertnr, In behalf Of said Ralseee
but al0s said h'lSUeek and Cook 70 10 without al
INTERFERING WITH INVESTIGATIONS BY TIL
GRAND JURY
Eleventh. Chdrgc-Improperi using the powe
? and influence of his Office TO prevent q prope
. Investigation by "a Grand Jury into his allege
otncial misconduct
First specineaton-ThAt Henry A. Richard editc
and proprietor Of newspaper called the Brookly
Chi Oice, which the character OF Winchester Brl
ton District Attorney was criticised. That Jude
heurI A, Moore gave u special charge to the Graz
Jury with reference to the ARTICLES In said Cftoaet
winch rejected upon sand Winchester Britton. 1hi
said Winchester Br tOu used the power and nnueuC
OF his once OF District Attorney, and his Oficial pos
a legal OF the Grand Jury, u preyeI
said Grund Jury from opriy inquiring into the tru
Brooklyn ca OHltc OF ms Ofheal misconduct, but
the contrary, did adv and induce SAID Grand Jury
make such inquiries anu Institute such Investigation
. wouid enable hun TO commence civil proceedhlI
aBet the editors ID propretors Of the o. vi BrooAly
ie for bel vhich action he did theTeupon col
mence, and claimed arge pecuni ~ damages therein.
Sec, nj SpeclheatiOn-Ihat said Winchester BrittG
advised saiu Lrand Jury that they had not the time
q the invest satlous which thny had been direct
/. to Dy Judge Moore for the reason, us he to
tne, that they must necessarily dJourn at the cad
TIE week during hlch RAID inye, n ton was 9yagea
ried on. That he told them thai they could have
legal existence Grand jury afer saId week, VIII
i he well knew that said aavlco not In acoordan
d with law, nnd that he gave said advice for the purpo
and Win ts Intent OF preveuting said 0rana Jury FRO
" lnnuiring INTO his alleged miscOn nduct.
Thru SpecihcAuon-rhat by false ADVICE 70 said GrA
jury, by undue and improper influence he atteml
u control IN r action la the matter Of the nvestt
t Gon which they were mTected % make By Judge Moo