The Valley Virginian. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1865-1895, 1873-10-16

| Court OF APPEALs.-We append the proceed
ipgs of the Court of Appeals, sine, the last pub
licoti we made The Court adjourned on last
Saturday. a number CT cases were continued in
| consequence OF the sickness and death of Col.
Jno b. Baldwin, who was counsel:
Shaver vs, Swartz & Levy-rue awarded vs,
appellant to enter new supersedeas bond in the
| penalty of $1,000.
Maury VS., Chesa. 6, Q R R Co,-continued
till next term
Armentrout VS., Derror-dlsmissed, appellant
having failed to mature the case
Appeal allowed from decree of Rockingham
crcuit court i'll Baugher's ADM, VS., Conrad
aanr, sc, and bond Of 500 required.
Gatcwood's admir- VS., Goode, &c,-argued by
Shelley & Bumgardner for appellant and Pen
dleton for appellee, and submitted.
Rucknan, &C, Us, Lightner's ex 'or-argued by
Shelley for appellant, and Hanger for appellee,
and submitted.
John Crawford &c, vs, Rudolph Turk, Sher
if, argued and submitted by Niche and Elder
Tor appellants and Baldwin & Cochran and Shelf
fey Dumgardner for appellees Isaac Hardesty
vs., F. S. Kagan &c, decree of circuit court o.;
Rockingham affirmed Woodson for appellee
and Baldwin for appellant.
Nm H Tams vs. Samuel Branaman, decree of
Augusta county court confirmed Niche, Sheffey
Cochran for appellee
Lockridge VS., Lockridge, submitted on notes of
argument.
On petition of VIM A Anable on a writ of err
ror from Henrico, the Judge of the Hastings
Court of Richmond was authorized to bail Ana
BILE.
white and wife VS., McGammon, submitted on
notes of argument.
Bowman, Jr, vs. Miller, &c, on motion to re-
quire the assignee in bankruptcy Of the appel
liant to execute new supersedeas bond, motion
overruled.
Winchester & Potomac R r Co, o A, s Ma
nassas r R Co, dismissed by consent of the par
ties Conrad 4 Parker for appellant, Robertson
& Tucker for appellee.
Dice VS., Keagy, &C., argued and submitted =
shetfey & Bumgardner TOR appellant, Fultz s
Roller for appellees.
Rives, VS., Farish's admir- and Armentrout's
ex or VS., Gibson, SC, submitted.
Executor Of Goldman, Sr, VS., Shafer submit
ted Sheffey, Bumgardner and Johnston for APP
pellees and Woodson and Roller for appellants.
| Hansbrough and wife VS., Stinnett, submitted
upon notes of arg ment.
| shaver ys, Swaitz and Levy and al, required
bond executed and filed, and case submitted up
on notes.
Dever VS., Jordan and al, death of appellee,
| Harry Jordan, suggested of reoor |.
B D Hartman VS. s Jordan and al, fully argu-
ed by counsel and submitted
Anderson VS., Douglas admir- and al argued by
counsel and submitted.
DECISIONS.
White and wife vs. McGammon decree Of
Frederick circuit court reversed and remanded
for further proceedings, Judge Moncure deliver
4 ing the opinion Of the court. Parker for appel
lants, Clarke Moore for appellee
Goss, &c, VS., Southall, judgment of Albemarle
circuit court affirmed, Christian delivering the
| opinion of the court. Watson for appellants.
| Niche, Robertson and Southall for appellees.
Crawford VS., G awn's ex'or, decree of Rock
ngham circuit court reversed, Anderson deiv
ering The opinion of the court, Baldwin Il Coch
ran for appellant, Fultz & Roller for appellee ..
| Bowman, .Jr, vs., Price, decree of Rockingham
| circuit court affirmed, Staples delivering the
opinion of the court, Roller for appellant
Williams admir- VS., Skinker and wife, decree
of Frederick circuit court affirmed, Christian de-
livering the opinion of the court, and Anderson
delivering an opinion and Bouldin nd Staples
dissenting. Robertson and Williams for appel
lants Conrad & Parker for appeees
rorrer vs. Coffman, SC, judgment of Rocking
ham circuit court affirmed. Staples delivering
the opinion of the court, Woodson for Plaintiff in
error and Yancy for Defendant in error.
Gatewoods im'r VS., Goode and wife, &c, de-
cree of Bath circuit court affirmed, Bouldin de-
livering the opinion of the court Shetfeys 4
DumRAruAeI LUZ 6pPoAiuAo "no 1 oAAe-So- - %P
pellee.
Marshall vs., Hidgeon SC, decree of Frederick
circuit court reversed and case remanded, Chris
tan delivering the opinion of the court, Conrad
s. Son for appellant, Barton, Boyd Hunter q
Holiday FOR appellees.
Brumbaugh VS., Wissler's ex' or, judgment Of
circuit court reversed, Bouldin delivering the
opinion of the court, Williams & Williams for
plaintiff and Harris for defendant.
! Sively VS., Campbell &c, decree of Allegheny
circuit court affirmed, Bouldin delivering the
opinion of the court, Mays for plaintiff, Parrish
for defendant.
Levy VS., Lands. &c, from Rockingham, dis
missed for want of requisite bond.
Switzer VS., Switzer, and Swoopes admir- vs.,
Swoope's admir-, continued till next.
Whitesell and al VS., Whtesell's admir- and al,
decree of Rockingham circuit court affirmed;
Judge Moncure delivering opinion of the court,
Baldwin and Grattan for appellants, Woodson
and Roller for appellees.
Frazer VS., Frazier, Baxter, &c., decree of Bath
circuit court reversed because rendered in va
cation, Judge Moncu,e delivering opinion Of tha
court, Letener, Terrell, llichie and Robert ION
for appellants, Baldwin & Cochran for appeliees.
Teel and al VS.. Yaacy and al, motion for re-
L1o.. III