Eaton weekly Democrat. [volume] (Eaton, Ohio) 1866-1875, 1873-12-11

uOI CllCi. L al.
e Same VS.. Douglass, ct al.
Martin Beale vs.. j. n. Lake.
linn VS.. Patty.
t G. r. Whitman VS.. j. A. Bolens.
John King VS.. Francis King.
} The following cases were continu
, ed by consent or upon motion.
Clawson VS.. ClawsOn.
Rowe VS.. Thompson.
Reeves VS.. Brewer, ct al.
Tuttle VS.. Walters, ct al. Leave to
reply by January Goth.
Lee VS.. Mcclellan, ct al.
Mack VS.. McDivitt.
Nine VS.. Dearth.
Geo. Brewer ct al. VS.. Henry Locke
ct al.
James Button VS.. Nathan Huffman.
Israel Sheer VS.. w. Bruce, at plain
tiff7s cost and on his application amen
ded reply filed.
j. D. Miller VS.. John G. Colvin.-
This case was heard upon the cross
petition of l.. Sc j. Gable setting up
a mechanics lien. Lien established
for the amount due, $7S,88. On the
the part of plaintiff a new appraise-
ment-and sale ordered.
Lewis Bader vs.. Ed. FELTON,. New
appraisemeni and sale ordered.
Daniel Peters VS.. Mary Geiller, ct:
al. In this case John Dodds was
made party defendant and filed his
cross petition and Benjamin Will
liams withdrew his cross petition and
paid his costs.
Kniscly Mcintyre s. Co VS.. Horn
and wife. Settled and dismissed.
Brubaker & Bro. VS.. Levi Davis
Discontinued.
Means and johnson Assiguees VS..
j. f. Ellison. Tried to the Court; is
sues found i'll favor of defendant and
petition dismissed.
Mary A. Gale VS.. Elisha Chrissman
ct al. This case was tried, argued
and submitted to the Court. a plea
of the statute of Limitation was ruled
out on demurrer. Held under adj
viscment.
Brumbaugh VS.. Afford and same
VS.. Afford and Kramer. These cases
were heard upon a motion to strike
answers from !he files. Motion over
ruled. The cases now stand upon
demurrer to the answers.
Mary j. Ireland VS.. David A. Ire
land. Compromised as per agree
ment and discontinued.
L. Sc J. Gable VS.. Eby. Dismissed
and costs paid.
Pottenger vs.. Larsh, ct al. Dis
missed and costs paid.
Eli Thompson VS. Joseph Fisher.
Action for Assault and battery, and
the only case tried to a jury during
the first week. The case occupied
two full days and resulted in a ver-
diet for the defendant. Motion for a
new trial filed.
Adjourned until Monday morning.
Convened Monday morning, Judge
GILMORE, Presiding, when the follow
cases were disposed of:
limerick VS.. Limerick ct al. Com
promised Mikesell VS.. NIikesell ; dis
missed; Gates VS.. Brewer, conrpro-
missed Taylor, Guard'n. VS.. Wysong
Guardian, continued Baird VS.. Rem
ner 81 Heckathorn. Leave to make As
signee of Plaintiff party and continu-
ed; Armer VS.. Crowell, ct al, dismiss
ed; Fall VS.. Taylor,et al, discontinued
Brown VS.. McGill, discontinued Ker-
win VS.. Christman, discontinued
Guild VS.. Stephens, ct al, discOntin-
eud Hubert VS.. Mclaughlin, discon-
tinued; Farr 6 Hopkins VS.. Farr;
Tried to Court; judgment for plain
tiff $12,75 and costs. Receiver order
ed to pay amount.
After a session of six days and an
examination ofS7 witnesses, the Grand
Jury reported 81 Indictments, as fol-
lows: Assault and Battery A; Stab
with intent to kill l Z; Grand Larceny
2; Intoxication l; Shooting with in
tent to kill 2; Unlawful.y taking
mare l; Assault and threatening l !;
Petit Larceny 3; Burglary l; Carry
ing concealed weapons l; Selling
liquor on premises 4; Selling liquor
to minors 3; Selling liquor to persons
in habit of getting intoxicated 1.
The 'stereotyped" report i'll regard
to the miserable condition of our