The New York herald., 1873-12-14
SUNDAY,

practically Confederate transactions, from which
they were TO be treated tue same as other trans
This decision turned upon the repeal OF the act
charging the assets OF the bank with the payment
first, OF the fire bOndhoders, and secondly, the re-
dempion OF Its bills W. w. Boyce for plaintiffs in
error ID. II. chamberlain ior defendants.
No. 144. United States vs. Kenner ct al, and
l45, I40 and l47.-Appeals from the District Court
OF Lousiana.-These are suits for the confirmation
OF Spanish titles under the eleventh section OF the
act OF June 1860. providing Tor the nal adjustment
OF land claims In Florida, Louisiana and Missouri
the parties defendant here claiming under Spanish
grants, and their lands having been sold they
ask certificates of location elsewhere Tor the guam
tity OF land to which they were entitled under
their grants, In pursuance OF the statute. Inc
Court below decreed that they were entitled 10
such certificates, and the government here main
tains that the Court had no power to enter sucn
a decree, that the decree should have been simply
that the claimants should have the rights TO enter
upon any OF the public lands OF the United states,
ana u ~ asked that the DEGREES be SO reformed.
ney General Hin for government; Louis Journaud
and Caleb Cushing for claimants.
No. AGO. County of st. Clair vs. Livingston ct al
Error TO the Supreme Court or Illinos-Submitted
under the twentieth rule.-This is a contest be-
tween the parties concerning the title to tract OF
land lying within the county, the county claim
ing under the Swamp Land act OF Congress grant
10 the several counties in the State or Illinois
all the lands lying within them, and the defendants
d
government. The decision below sustained the
title OF the county, and the rulings OF the Court
reaching that Judgment are assigned as error.
G. Koemer for plaintiff W. Ii. Underwood Tor
defendants.
No. 13o. Mckay vs.. wooster ct al.-Appeal from
the Circuit Court for California.-The plaintiff in
this case filed his bin to restrain the defendants
from making or using in the State, and Territories
west OF the Rocky Mountains, certain cases for
packing eggs, in violation OF mis- patent, claimed
by assignment for that Territory. The defendants
are commission merchants in san Francisco and
receive eggs in these cases by consignment from
persons VINO rightuly use them under an assign
ment OF the states and Territories east OF the
Rocky Mountains and the question arose whether
when patented article has been lawfully made by
a Territorial assignee OF the patent right and sold
by him, without condition restriction, within
the territory included in his assignment, the pur-
chaser acquires the right to use the article IN an-
other Territory, for which another person has
taken an assignment for the same patent. The
Circuit Court held the affirmative OF this question,
and the case is brought here for review, the ap-
pellant taking the contrary view Case submitted
under the twentieth rule N. Bennett for appel
liant, Curry Churchill for appellees. This Court
recently, at this term, in another case affirmed
the view taken by the Court below in dismissing
the bill in this