davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1873-10-23
EWINGTON ACADEMY.

The Winter Session of this School will begin
on Tuesday, November /, 1873, and continue
Sixteen Weeks For further information apply
to GEORGE CHERINGTON,
Oot. l6j 'T3-5w Principal.
The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1873-10-23
The Best Paper.
TRY TTtii

The Scientific Ansericdn is the cheapest and
best illustrated weekly paper published. Every
number contains from 10 to 10 original englaV-
ings of new machinery. Novel Inventions,
Bridges, Engineering Works, Architecture, Inn
proved Farm Implements, and every new DIS
covery in Chemistry \ years numbers con-
tain $50 pages and several hundred engravings
Thousands of volumes are preserved for blnd-
ing and reference. The practical receipts are
well worth ten times the subscription price
Terms, 50 Il year, by mail. Specimens sent free.
Nav be had of all Newsdealers. PATENTS
obtained on the best terms, Models of new in
ventions and sketches examined, and advice
free. All patents are published in the SClEN-
TIFIC AMERICAN the week they issue. Send
for pamphlet, 10 pages, containing laws and
full directions for obtaining Patents Address
tor the Paper, or concerning Patents, MUM q
CO.. 81 Park Row, n. Y. Branch Office, corner
f and 7th StS., Washington, D. c.
The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1873-10-23
II H f
It HI e
Crown Wringerz

The cheapest and best in the market. Warrant
ed truIv self-adiusting. Special Inducements
to Washing Machine Agents and the COun-
try Trade. Liberal terms. Agents wanted
Send for Circular AMERICAN MACHINE
Co. Manufacturers and PatenteeS, office, 4SO
Walnut ST., Philadelphia Pa.
The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1873-10-23
Newman's majority. 49,.

The following are the official majorities
for Judge of the Court of Common Pleas
in this subdivision:
The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1873-10-23

The following are the majorities for
Senator in this district
The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1873-10-23
BANK REPORT,

EPORT OFTHE CONDITIONS
OF THE
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS.
BOARD OF ASSISTANT ALDERMEN.

M A meeting Of the Board OF Assistant Aldermen
was held yesterday, President Wade In the chair.
The business was OF very routine character, and
consisted mainly OF the consideration Of general
orders" The Board adjourned until Monday next.
-.,rt REAsslGNMENT OF THE CITY HALL ROOMS.
Il It will probably be remembered by our readers
that the last Common Council appointed commit
tee to consider the desirability OF reassgnng the
rooms of the City Hall, with view OF concentrating
oil the city Offices in that building and more espe
cially for the accommodation OF the Department Of
Public Works. In furtherance OF this object the
joint committee appointed by the present Common
Council have held several meetings, and the follow
ing are the recommendations to be submitted to
the Board OF Aldermen ut their meeting on Thurs
day neXt:- ..rs.,.-,., y,
City Hall Building to he added to the City Library.
The room ON the northwest corner, formerly Occu-
pied by the Commissioner OF Assessments was set
apart for the OF the Naturalization Clerk, the
room now used by the latter to be given to the
or the Commissioner Of Jurors; the room occupied
by the Commissioner Of Jurors to be added to tho
Governors Room; the rooms occupied by the
Keeper ordered to be given up for the use Of
the Board OF Assistant Aldermen; the rooms Occu-
pied at present by the Clerk OF the Board Of Assist
ant Aldermen, the CorOners, James O'Brien and
the Collector of Assessments to be vacated to pro-
vide suitable room for the Department or Public
Works .e..f.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21

ing, with the remark, al ara not present that re-
c eeips at all; 1t was handed in by WOODWARD,
@ The endorsement on the check is in your hand.
"rnlne, is itf A. endorsed 1t for woodward.
800 and the check for SEA 500 December T. 1871.
several other papers representing various smaller
amounts were also exhibited, identified aud put
n evidence. amid several short discussions as to
Counsel for defence said he would show by these
actions with Mr.. Garvey for work done bv him for
Mr. Tweed Tweed holds his (Garvey 81 receipts
amounting 70 sl47ooo, and all paid out OF Tweed's
Another paper, identified by witness as in his
own handwriting was dated November l, 1870, was
Dill for work done by Mr.. Garvey on Mr.. Tweed's
property ct Greenwich from September, 1882 to
November, 1870, and was for $oo,ls4. Admitted as
Q. When you appeared before the Grand Jury
DID YOU SWEAR
that you never paid Mr.. Tweed cent in your
lile, nor promised him cent, nor received cent
nom him improperly A. l did not; i do not
recOn 1 grand Juror ever asking me any such
Q. What answer did you make If you were asked
The Court ruled out the question as "in volving
Of New York Reports to show that the Court OF
Appeals sustained such an '.absuraity.n
have testified about nnderstard the prncpa
0Dlect involved was the erection Of house for
Comptroller Connolly, and understood you to say
IKE $lls 600 Tor your part OF the work to be done
about that house. Have you ever returned that
$l10,0 A. No, Sir. 4f rta a fTra
DICK CONNOLLY AGAIN.
q. Did you bring suit against Connolly within
. O. year past for this anount9 A. never heard OF
such suit and never brought 1t. Why, Sir you
asrOnish me l1'arI 10 sE7 aiL . .rEIilIl'| q
Q. Has amy claim been made against Connolly
A. Yes, sir, ior little over 100000 tor work and
materials on that mouse / have been paid $4,000
on account OF that's l received $4,000 cash In
one check, or rather Mr.. Connolly and myself ex-
changed checks for that amount, in 1871; re-
celved IN all $52,320 IA, In various sums in 1871;
the claim was sent in by my brother while l was
away.
The witness went on to state in explanation OF
his position quite lengthy rigmarole, and counsel
suggested that "a Philadelphia lawyer be- tele-
graphed for to take care oil this witness.n
The C0urt-Don't bother with Philadelphia law
yers. We have lawyers enough here already.
daughter. The hit was felt.) "a q. tstf.ld =
Q. Was there not payment Of SAC, $40 IL allowed
on account OF your claim the claim being actually
made in 1870? A. There was.
The witness then made lengthy explanation,
from which II appeared that his brother, John
Carney, had transacted nearly II not the whole OF
this business, and that his information the sub.
Ject was chiefly Cleaned from what his brother had
written and told him. The explanation was not
allowed as evidence, everything being stricken out
except such parts as mOdi1ed the witness pre-
vi0us answer.
This closed the days proceedings, and the cross.
examination VIII be resumed this morning.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
COURT CAtsnusRs-rHIs DAY. .

SUPREME COURT CIRcUT- TRIAL TERM-part l.
Held by Judge Fancher.-Nos. 1881. 49, Cpl u, 600,
1885, 1921 S7 3S7a, 675, 74 sls. $780, SAL, s45. ISL,
SCI, sea, s6s, 8. Fart 2-Ie by Judge Van BRunt.-
Nos. 70, 1884, 530H, o44. lsz l6S, $780, 1442 ll6 $780,
44o d641a, TAG, sls, $40, s2i, $40, $780, S2s, $40.
SUPREME CouRT-GENERAL TERM-Held by Judges
Ingraham, Brady and Learned.--Nos. l66, ITO. i72,
15s 49, is2 iss iss 49, 2Ss lss 1ss lsl, 81, ls2,
SUPREME COURT-CHAMBERs-Held by Judge Bar
rettNos.7 &c. ST. 49, IS, 3d. "a, 96, 90, o. 90, 102h.
Call, LOT. ult fn niNlgJ IS
SUPERIOR CoURT-TRIAL TERM-.Part 1-Held by
Judge Curtis.-AdJOurned to Wednesday, January
%, 1873. Part Held by Judge Fredman.-Nos.
1885, 1853 liz, 2O2O 1872 54O 1885, 4O4 1896, 1140,
804, 1854, 370 1872 1874. a-fn N3
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs-TRIAL TERM-Part i
Held by Judge RObinson-N0s. 1912, 1895, 1906,
$780, l29 lI24, $685. &c. 1866, IS, 1898, 1861, 1866,
374 2495, 1871, 1853 500, 1907 1247 1854 1909 1885,
5l2, 1649, 612 61s 1Gls, 1892 1644 Sill, 3O4 TO- So
1909, 164. .a5t 800
MARINS CoURr-TRrAL TERM-Part s-Held by
Judge Jodchmsen-Nos. 1894, 1717, 1859, 1000, 1063
1861 1907 1885, 1885, 1867 1870 1911 1919 1850 1851
1865. $685. 1870 l1O4 12ss 1924 1892 1904 434 1905
1854, 122. 1904. Part 2-Iield by Judge Gross.-Nos
1907 1857 1433 1877 1891 1870 1885, 5S5, 1921, 1105
1lOS, 1443, 1445 l447, 1449.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
= MARINE COuRT-pART !.
Suit Improperly Brought In the Name
OF q Partner OF q Firm.
Z % pninro J,,dOo onauldin0 NWf4

suit Improperly brought In the Name
OF Partner OF q Firm.
f'a' Before Judge Spaulding. N t1t
Lazarus Bl0ut vs.. Felix Marx.-Defendant keeps
c0Sler restaurant in this city, where the food Is
prepared in accordance with the Jewish faith. In
February, 1870 plaintiff entered into copartnership
with one David Minzesheimer for the purpose Of
opening q similar restaurant within two blocks or
defendants place Of business They accordingly
leased the premises for one year from the lst OF
March, at the rate OF $500 per month"; aud engaged
carpenters, masons and plumbers to mt up the
place for their business Paintir alleges that the
defendant sought out each and every one
OF the mechanics engaged to do the work
aud told them to have nothing to do with
plaintlr or. his partner; that they were
swindlers and cheats and only desired to have
lne elegant restaurant lifted up In order to trans
fer 1t to other parties, and thus cheat the me-
chanics and labOrers; that by making these state
ments the mechanics were induced to withdraw
from the work, ana plaintiff and his partner were
prevented from opening and carrying on their
the designed time during the busiest season OF the
year, aud plaintiff brings this suit to recover
damages Tor the loss which he sustained. 1t ap-
peared from the evidence that the plaintiff and
MinZesheimer are Still In partnership and the
Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that
the loss II any, was stained by the firm, and that
suit to recover for damages can be brought only
III the name OF the firm, lstyf. lii.s ". AT 'tHaI
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
THE TWEED TRIAL.

Andrew j. Carney Takes the Day to
HImsclE-A Remarkable Batch OF Tes-
timOny-His Trip to Europe-An About
His Wires Diamonds and the stBoss'"
silver Present.
A dense crowd was in attendance at the Court
Of Oyer and Terminer yesterday morning to hear
the proceedings In the Tweed trial before Judge
Davis OF course the great interest was to hear
what Andrew ]. Garvey had to say In his cross-ex-
animation as to the hows and why's OF the kinks
and lodges by which the famous robbing ''ring"
had nched the public funds The crowd IN at
tendance, indeed, seemed much more eager for
the details than on any preceding day. chiefly be.
cause 1t was expected that there would be more
lively sparring between the cross examining
counsel and the witness. Sheriff Brennan,
Coroner Young and quite number OF
public officials dropped in during the day
just to see chow the old thing was working" as
the "Bossr himself was once wont to say. The
proceedings as whole were extremely interesting
though perhaps little dry, as there was not so
much sparrng as was anticipated. The following
are the proceedings
A.. y. GARvEYs TESTIMONY.
Andrew J. Garvey, recalled to the witness stand,
testified that OF the fourteen checks deposited
in the Broadway Bank was deposited by Ingersoll,
Mr.. woodward being out OF town.
Cross-examined-I do not know that am joined
in the prosecution for million Of dollars with Mr..
Tweed, but saw 1t in the papers; do not know
that any application was made on my behalf
70 the Attorney General to prevent my
arrest In that action, but 1 heard so from
my brother; saw in the papers that my bail
was fixed at 100000 saw in the papers last
August copy Of aletter from the Attorney Gen.
eral to the Sherin, telling him not to arrest me:
don't know how 1t came to be written: never
spoke to the Attorney General on the subject: the
substance OF the letter was, en- I. Brennan. Shcr-
ID, have to request that you will not in making
arrests on the civil suits, arrest Andrew J. Gar.
vey," and 1t was signed, General Barlow"
q. Did you ever read that more than once-did
you commit 1t memory A. No, sir; and 1 don't
think have 1t very correct now.
Q. Then you have a very good memory; you have
Il almost word for word when did you read 1t asts
A. The Sheriff showed 1t to me this morning iii his
once.
Q. Did you ask for itY A. No, sir.
Q. Did you read it carefully A. No. sir just
looked at 1t.
Council here proposed to read a copy of the let
ter, to show that the witness has
AN EXCELLENT MEMORY,
except when the shoe pinches, and then 1t is mon
mi yfcordo.n
Judge Davis refused to allow either the copy or
the original remarking that counsel had the letter.
and what more did he wantS
Mr.. Tremain withdrew the objection and allowed
to be read.
Q. DO you know anything about indictments
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
CITY FINANCE.

The Comptroller Asks tho Mayor fok
Legislatton to Reduce the Taxation Of
1s73-A Little Item Of 90, 100000 That
the state Wnnts-The Fourth Avenue
Improvement Bonds.
The following letter was yesterday sent to Mayor
Havemeyer:-
cr or Ss% TSss ja g.
Hon "; ,. HAvKxEyER. Mayor = ,o,, .
in conmspieaiion Of the 9th inst the necessity q
you ~ allow again this mos, impcTan.
@ By
ssIs should Ssncas further
s s y q. & s
mai An S passed IN submit s People
sSSs@ p s
Ss DECIDES ies must Be ea by
because such submission is for reasons
The raising Of Che means TO make ap this deficiency on
the % @ e q f s. do an
be chargeable on that year. propose, therefore
ply assyns Ss es f" u
pa IN Sd S"
the proceeds bonds issued for the purpose;
a s' 'ss these ad The % % S
made Avail To OF a S s counties Of the state
the Of all unexpendcd balances OF last year
The necessity such legislation is illustrated by the
fact that one OF the departments In statement lately
published claims that there balance unexpended OF
$469 ECO % OF provided for its current for
the 1872 This amount Of money more than was nee
for its raised by taxation at the cost
Of the interest In addition to this the dema ms or inc
department Tor money tor expenses OF Is12 were
reduced by the Board Of Apportlonnent in the sum Of
asked for by that department. beyond its reasonable me-
Third-That the raising in 1873 Of sl50S,00o for the
Fourth be postponed until 1874 or
needed There Is now than million ana half IN
the Treasury for this purpose raised III whch VIII
probably sufice 10 carry the work through iHa
FowdThat the appropriations Tor CARRYING on the gov.
delay and departments compelled ~ reduce expenses
have prepared draft Of bill TO accomplish the OBJ
above respectfully ASK II its provisions
approval II be transmitted 10 the Legislature
early you deem practicable for the reduction
expenses should commence at once and not be lett
until a quart OF the year has passed.
we may expect reduction OF $6SO0OD0 In the taxation
and that the rate will be about 26 tho
valuation OF 1872 as against rate 1859 per cent of
actual expenditure for 1871.
You win observe that this communication relates to
the current ordinary expenses of the and
that II in no respect proposes to check hinder the prog
rcss OF the great pubic improvements for the develop
ment or adornment OF the city. These should go for
ward under wise ard liberal direction smu ated by
insists that the money the people should be applied
a. TO realize actual results for every dollar expended
have the honor 10 be, with great respect -lItr
ANDREW H. GREEN Comptroller.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
BROOKLYN COURTS.
COURT OF OYER AND IERMIEER.

Second Trial Of the Alleged Murderess
Fanny Hydc-The Accused Not Present
and Hcr Recogntzancc Forfcited-Thc
"Unplcasa ntncss'' Between District At
torney Britton and Ex-Judge Morris-A
Tilt in Court-The Court Desires . Mo-
ton to Postpone-A Doctrine Not To BE
Tolerated.
Before Judge Gilbert and Associate Justices John
son and Stiwell.
The Oyer and Terminer court room was crowded
yesterday morning it having been previously an.
nounced that Mrs. Fanny Hyde would be again
placed on trial for the murder of George W. Wat
son, her employer and alleged seducer, on the goth
OF January last. Mrs. Hyde was not present, but
her counsel, ex-Judge Morris, General Catlin and
p. Ready, appeared an d opposed District Attorney
BrittOn's motion that the second trial Of the case
should at once be proceeded with.
The Clerk called the defendant three times, but
OF course there wps no response.
District Attorney Britton Immediately moved for
the forfeiture OF her recoRnizance, which Is 81 500
Ex-Judge Morris, in support OF his motion Tor
postponement, submitted an affidavit made Ny him.
self, which ID given below
Hyde, who stands indicted TOR the homicide Of Mr. Wat
sanqsr y. is until the 18Th dsy ApS
SsfSss ysis "a .ns
manslaughteT in the third degree the jury being dis
aeS q o. S. srn IN s s u nat she was
ATTORNEY, BECOMING prPornSr,
ST Be
os faisS Gf re- h e hs
rSt had b er from hs PET and was
n" 70 s But hat % make bTc
% have a ssss Which t %
2rney making only pretended Ice ri mat The
form the proceedings had on former trial. that Tor
long time N 70 T., him have the e
regarding as impr9psr e have te case published
disposed and 90 70
that Ts s h he % hs
up his mind 10 .. ...... u
nn& @ ay % os has
mated, directly indirectly. that he intended
, case agsin fact he never ALLUDED e the
$sponsnt acted his soSassi nss he SOIL
withdraw as his counsel wTote him Letter stating some
sDaa he %
csySd noCs IL 4 wh in be appeared 70 be
ns s Sas rdn an smsc S B
polls And depohent charges that the District Attorney
In this matter matters Is .o NO. 49,. .,.o,
and not sense duty u, y. that
S u bS sS M arr an IN Pe
on behalf q said Fanny hyde that the fact. hat she
oy 4 her SSenss hS , 'p ssn From Per
they have sailed for Europe before the noticed
for trial peponent further says that General = Cat
lin Is associated counsel with deponen In said
that for long time past, deponcnt Is informed Gen
ernl Catin has been confined to his house and
wholly unable TO enter upon such trial -
S. d. MORRIS
An afidavit OF John Windley, the father OF Fanny
Hyde, certifying to the departure for Europe OF the
parties above alluded to, was also submitted and
then U
Ex-Judge Morris said that he had only received
notice TO be ready for trial alter the term had com
menced, ON the 9TH inst.
District Attorney Britton had no answer to
make to motion TO postpone unless the defend
ant were present. He said the case might be put
on for the next five years on account OF the alb
senee oil these witnesses, as 1t had been before lie
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
THE MAYORS OFFICE.

The renovation OF the rooms Of the Mayors once
is progressing with as much despatch as tho
weather will permit. The painters are giving the
cornices new coat of white paint. and in a few
weeks the Mayors rooms will return to the prs-
is still honored day after day with calls from dis
tinguished visitors. Among those more distin-
guished who called yesterday were General Sharpe,
OF Kansas Thurlow Weed and General Storms.
The latter gentleman reminded the Mayor that he
was present ut the laying of the stone or the
City Hail. being commander OF the military at that
time, and was well acquainted with Mayor Have.
meyara father.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
renewed his motion to have the recognizanc. for.

renewed his motion to have the rscognizancs for.
Judge Gilbert remarked that IL was not onso.
lutely necessary that the defendant should be-
present on motion to postpone, hut he did NOT
think that the motion was an answer to motion
to have the recOgnizance forfeited
In lengthy speech OF Counsellor Morris which
followed he declared 1t to be the duty OF the Court
to interfere and protect the rights OF the defendant
as the District Attorney was actuated by
PERSONAL FEELING
In making the motion. 1t was not made in the due
administration of justice. I
District Attorney Britton replied that he did not
feel called upon to answer such harangue, but he
would say that he had never given counsel to un-
a th anything Other than ne intended to try
again.
Judge Gilbert decided that there was no surlcient
excuse presented why the recognizance should not
be forfeited. He said that 1t was
DOCTRINE NOT TO BE TOLERATED.,
snaI because OF DISAGREEMENT OF Jury 9 person
the discretion OF the District Attorney to notice
the case for trial This case was postponed In Oc-
tober last, and two terms had passed since then.
Two weeks notice had been given to the counsel,
and that was sufficient TO enable her to be present.
Judge Gilbert said further that there 0bliga-
tion on the District Attorneys part to intimate
that he was or was not going to try the case again.
The motion to postpone was denied aud the mo-
ton to forfeit the acquaintance granted.
NORRIS PERSONAL INTEREST.
Ex-Judge Morris then sald there was another
reason why he opposed the motion, which he had
not stated, and that was that he was the fndem-
nit0r OF the sureties on the rec0gnizance. 1915
Judge Gilbert smiled, ana remarked that he
should have considered that before he went ON.
Ex-Judge Morris retired discounted, but soon
be fixed for the second trial of DIR. rish The de-
fence would be ready to-day. frI "a VI II
~ se saa tcat was matter within tho
Mr. Britton said that when he noticed that case
and the gentleman was ready. he supposed they
The clerk dismissed the witnesses until further
notice, and all parties then left the court room.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
CITY cous1-speclAL TERM.

Ex.May0r Brush's Son ~ Defendant I'm q
Divorce Suit.
Before Judge Nelson. 49,
Mrs. Mary Brush brought an action some timS
since for an absolute divorce, on the ground Of
adultery from her husband, Dr. Francis v. Brush.
son of the late ex-Mayor Brush. The couple were
The case was sent to referee, before whom testi-
mony was introduced showing that the defendant
had been guilty OF. infdelity at the Brandreth
charge Of adultery against his wife, but there was
no testimony produced to establish the charge. 1t
also appeared that the Doctor was entitled to
1850 per annum under the provisions Of his
fathers WILL
Yesterday the referee reported In favor OF grant.
ing the divorce and $24 week alimOny.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
COURT Of COMMON PLeAs-spEcIAL TERM.
Decisions.
On Ini.oI0o

BY Judge Loew.
Irwin vs.. Fied-M0tiOn granted. va hfsas ~
Wendell VS.. Standardization for amended return
granted ni1 l4 .&.3Qtqi
u Worster vs.. The Forty-second street and Grand
street Ferry Railroad Company.-Mot0n to strike
out certain portions OF the complaint irrelevant
and redundant granted.
Mckay vs. McKay.-Judgment OF divorce granted.
Keyser vs. Standardization denied. er.7y
Deacon vs. DISQUALIFICATION granted.
Stevens Vs. Hastings. -Same. nol y,d
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
BUSINESS IN THE OTHER COURTS
SUPERIOR couRI-speclAL TERM

Decisions.
By Judge Barbour.
Turner We. DiOn.-MOtiOn granted. .,.
Wolf vs.. JacObs.-Same
Weiss We. Weiss.-Order granted.
Horton W.. Moore.-Same.
Grady VS.. T0dd.-Same.
Cammeyer vs.. Hamilt0u.-Same, .f.f
HOrnstein Vs. Frost.--Motion denied.
Bradley Vs. the Narragansett Steamship Com
allowed. r-
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21

Counsel continued to read from the Deposition
The case was adjourned untn this morning.
The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-21
THE COURTS.
THE TWEED RING TRIAL.

0arvsy on the Stand All Day-His Psregrina.
lions Abroad-More Abroad in His Claims
DO Against the City-riamond Presents to
His WMe-An Exhaustive Cross-Exam-
nation Not Yet Exhausted-A
$4,000 Nots Endorsed by
.sA Garvey, but Disavowed by
Him--A New Insight
10 Ring Tactics.