The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-02-01

has never thN,ked mo for IT. but has abused me
'nEEusG sse papa pa Determination was then con-
tinued IN relation 70 his interview with Mrs. Van
deryoort. He satd@t believe Mrs. vandervo0rt
ence Of Mr. J. Q. Garter. that she heard OF Nine:
Jnms nay,ns vv sS1 Mrs. vanSeVoops an
aU nts think tna ls after Mrs vsnSeryoort
said she heard OF Madame hav,pg . son in Proy-
SS .a ds on ras . subject s: Witness s Ss
inquiries touching the age Of Madame ynmel and
furnish to the NEW YORK HERALD the notice which
appeared therein Of the death OF Madame Junel,
that his ' son n0 william had an nc W
Madame Jumel In 1855; he thinks that ne testified
on the last trial, that for time Madame
member OF his family tasting 1t; Mrs. Perry, the
daughter o. the witness, was living either at Forty
to Mr. Parton, author Of the "Life OF Aaron Burr"
with the Information that he was related 70 Nine.
Jumel by marriage-that he had married her niece;
tmid and expo ienced"-that was the authors
mode mod OF describing things; never furnished MT;
Parton with the information that Colonel Burr's
influence upon his students was bad.
REORGANIZATION.
The witness was briefly examined on the rc-d-
rect Dy Mr.. O'Conor In reference TO Conversations
and consultations between counsel for defendant
as to whether certain statements or allegations In
T wss the To the " s %
AFFECT his interest. MT, Chase said that when
Madame Jumel was going to Europe in 1851 sne
tated about allowing her to go; she then said
that his VIE had been always brought
up under her !!Madame'sl control; that she Was
troll his daughter and take charge OF her. that was
the statement Madame made about being the
mother Of his wife; witness knew that Madame
Jumel had be N married IN 1904 and he had learned
that his wife was born in 1901 ; II she were the
daughter OF Madame Jumel she must, therefore,
had ever meant to say upon that subject.
TESTIMONY OF JOHN @. CARYL.
John g. Caryl sw0rn:-l was acquainted with
Mr.. and Madame Jumel; have resided upon the
s1me property the homestead s,. was as tnirtysix
dred acres lot; m my iather went 10 the mansion in
1927; went to live there from March. 1897, until
1929; drove Madame Jumel's carriage know
that Madames visits TO the JOneses in 1897 were
quite frequent; Mr.. Jumel came there in 1923; the
family then consisted of Mr.. and Madame Jumel
y sas
whole OF the Winter; Mr.. Jumel constituted the
whole or the family in their absence.
z. While you were there did Mr.. Jumel state any
thing TO you as to the ownership Of that propertys
(ODjected tO.)
MI. O'Conor said he proposed to show that this
property bad been conveyed to Mary Jumel by
deeds.
Mr.. Hoar could not see that the question was
material or any issue in this case. They could not
prove the conveyance OF the property by the de-
claratons or Mr.. Jumel. In the course OF the dis
cussion that ensued Mr.. Hoar. made an alluson to
Mr.. O'COnOr said that when he had been
charged with cOrruptng witnesses and bribing
jurors ne determined that he would not submit
himself to abuse of that description, and would act
in the case gratuitousy. IL mad been set up that
he was not to ne paid unless this succeeded.
q hat had been SET uD TO make ont that he In
condition that corruption should be imputed to
him. But he did not choose to have that gross
impNtation put upon him. His learned friend
might laugh or grin at that as much as he pleased,
Mr.. .llOar said he did not expect such q comment
on a plan full and small remark.
~ vny audQ mo t,Ao
The Court, admitted the testimony
O. Did Mr.. ASInei, while he was thus on the prem.
ises and you welp working under him. speak to you
of power OF attorney given to Madame
Jumel? A. Yes; In 1928 he said to me that
Under a power Of attorney the properly
had been Sod ana that after his death and that OF
Madame JulDel the property vas TO go TO Mary
Jumel. He said that the property had been sold
out Of his hands: tnat he and Madame had SET
Element by which they were TO enjoy the property
during their lives, ana that after their deaths 1t
was to go to Mary, with which he said he was sat-
isned
Some further testimony having been given the
trial was adjourned to Monday morning wnen 1t
Will be again resumed.