Wilmington daily gazette., 1873-05-23
COURT PROCEEDINGS.

NEW CASTLE, May %, 1873.
The courts were opened this morning at 10 q.
M and the case of Elizabeth f. ODaniel vs.. the
Bakers Union of Wilmington was continued, Mr.
Bird counsel for the Bakers Union resuming his
argument to the jury which he delivered till about
half past eleven O'clock, at which time Mr.. Pat
terson, Counsel for plaintiff, addressed the court
with u lengthy argument on the law involved M
the case, citing many English ahd American re-
ported decisions to sustain his side of the and
IN reply 20 the numerous authorities produced by
Mr.. Bird yesterday in support of the opposite
sidOaS the grounds Of plaintiffs cause OF action,
and those of the defence have fully appeared Id
our former reports OF this case it 10 unnecessary
TO repeat them. They were argued at length to-
day. occupying the entire time until O'Clock THU
afternoon. Mr. Patterson continued addressing
the court till the at D. for dinner, alter
which no Ipaused for about twenty MIN
utes to enable Mr.. Bird to reply to some new au+
thoritics produeed for plaintiff, Afterwards Fesum-
ing his law argument aAd fnaIiy closing his ad-
dress to the Jury at o'clock. Owing to the late
ness of tue hour and the desire OF the court u
read and consider several points presented ny
counsel fOF plaintiff and defendant with request
that they be charged upon to the Jury the eonrt
reserved its charge till tomorrow morning at lp
o'clock dischaTging the jury empanneled IN thls
casa till that time The remainder OF the day was
i occupied IN giving judgments and continuing and
otherwise dlsposing of cases ON the trial list.
Judgments were given in the following cases.
viz:
T. f. Bayard VS.. John Il. Woods, Judgment for
plaintiff for S7l with thrae mouths stay of exceed
lion Walter eummins Esq, fors plaintiff, w. e.
SpFuance, ESQ, for defendant; Francis Dnggan
W.. James Armstrong, Judgment for plalntlh Tor
Sl8j, VIC Spruance, Esq, tor plaintiff George
| Gray, ESQ, for defendant. eskE
The Wilmington and Western r. r. co. Y
John II. Simms. Judgement for plaintiff fOl
SlO8 7S, with thTss mOnths stay OF execntlon; anc
in suit Of said II. Il. Co. Plaintiff VS.. William
HAYES, judgement for plaintiff tot $54AsI, Wlta
like stay of execution. Counsel in each case wel'
A g. II. Harrington ESQ., Tor plAlnElhS y, ID AOt
} ESQ., for defendant.
state. use OF Diamond State Iron Company "
: I.eob richardson. Judgment Tor plaintiff as u
Nav 18th, S295 s. Al. Harrington, ESD, ~
, plaintiff, q. b. Lore, Eaq, for defendant,
{ William 4allnP, d. b. u. Va Edward U Laylna
N n p aDDeal case from Justice Of the PeacF
I Judgment for IAymon, plaintiff below, for ~.
: q. ID. and j. II. Rodney, Esas' iOr appellant, W
4 q. Whiteley, Esq, tor appellee.
John A. Harris, D. b. u, vs. William II. Quinl
0 d. b. 7. Judgment for Harris. appellant Y
0 S49.9l. W. r. Hodgson, hsqs Tor appellant "s'
/ lrav. Esa., for defendant below.
a | ! IN case of Thomas ID. Kelley We. Finn ~
simnson. A ruls was laid on plaintiff tor aaa9s.L
!. IN eosts bV the inst ruls day in vacation. ~
i the second trial term for this case, and thfoa
the effect OF Noncompliance Win aAln ts
= would be discOntinnAnca, yss tns - 49, VI
s rne would not interfere with the trial OF the ea
i Hvan Act OF the last session oI the lAsiAlAt1I
y the IiFst panel OF Jurors serve for ton asla oh
% A new panel, therefore, was sum@ohSa tst
morrow, when the hrst are relieved. las ~
discharged all the jurors VI the Arae panel e1sa
those hearing tho ease Of O'Ilaniel ys tne neksl
Of Inion, Who arc required TO attend I'll tho fe4eN
ey ing OF their verdict in said case
n sfSs courts were adjourned till tomorrow m0F
ing, at 10 o'clock.