New-York tribune., 1873-01-31

faith, and that the money passed. 70 sns ss ofsD1 na
by Woodward was the payment OF uee" staa".
upon this point I desire 70 cah 'ns " IF
draw my check in your favor law don't CONSIDER ms
as giving You money but A. ~ debtor bnt they
want here TO reverse THAI presumpon ana naS
wm NJ Tweed received SsSs ros e m mart of the booty
obtained from the treasury OF this county 70 .y 1d
Woodward NS Ts 5p%Tsed prs the GRAND Jury
dict Garvey twice for forgery II was tne WaoSWard
that suggested tho When be- saw the storm
O,'ng TOOK himself beyond the Jurisdlston W ,oeS
courts There hope ne "' M aSe trial OF Mayor Hall.
Caryey testified that he had these was
Tweed and on nsSb this rS on srnis s ns ip anot saenty
damaging 10 Mr. Twoed-he makes iWeeu Sr
S.ar vhatever YOU have gOtto do do IL WIn MoOu".s
Indge Dswey said once prosecuting 0hcer NI1n %
out the sanction of the Court could Dy ns % hui m
' shle ttle 10 "A pardon TO any cIlulnai Du' IN
sSe OF an accOmpce the cooperation OF the
Court was necessary n order 10 esaho '1 ,dence ~
accompiices, he says that in regular ,,sSs
Of administrative JS JISsSe Nssre sn here M in the case
of (iaryey and Tweed an intimacy ootweeL nod n
and Of his pos.ll0nS %nen you % ,soeb he would
descend TO talk with lackey ike Garyty ~ VIZ b
Mr. Tweed carried al that time IN Ie pc t bnt W of 1he
state and 1t is absurd TO pretend that ne wou1 n'
stopped oompanionshlp WIN aekey .Ao ,Ss b was
worth 100000 In three years ms accumulation -, oi
riches has been at the rate OF sO1S y0a nv
e LIS c thai he so DO YOU not see how impossible
il would be for him to enrich hims9I ia that rapu
At i24S Mr. Peokham interrupted 70 remind Mr. era.
ham that his time up. Mr.. Field AZ once sa,9
"iou will certainly allow MT uIana'n W "N'" -"
Mr PecShan,-oh he may talk an hour II he wants TO-
Judge Dayis-Mr Field Mi uraham Also Is Vi sSe'
Mr Field quickly-I suppose can address the Court
Judge Davis-Certainly. Y0u can 90 on, Mr. Graham.
GARvgY DENOUNCED
Mr.. Graham then continued, aud reviewed GarVey
testimony In scathng tone and STYLE as MT Fullerton
did the day before alludng particularly to hs testimony
about interviews with the Atorney-General "heh
asked him, said Mr. Graham If there was any arrange
ment with the Attorney General he answered " nave
no arrangement with him ;" aud, when drive MN
against the wall he admits that he had an
with Mr.. OConOr, but supposed meant Gen. Barrow,
ana not those representing hi-as big lie as he ever
told In his life. 49,. II, ,o, ,.,,,
Now shall close by auding to Two things which YOU
have witnessed on this trial. aud which nave peIecs
right TO refer 1t found In the report OF TINS caso o'
Jan. 81. In passing upon the credbity Of wl.n1SS,
one of the most important elements in determining
whether he is to be believed or not Is the h'ne,
which he gives his evidence upon the stand oh tne @
second DAYS examination of Garvey you all heard me
ask him to tell what percentage IN the case OF eaC
swerng that 100000 out $4,000 the proportion
wanted know whether ia ne case OF the ~ Dms a
He HRe' had enlarged the bills by different
standard OF enlargement MY learned rnd IN
in that becoming spirit with when DC has phIneI
help me all thrOugh-the trouble s he has never heipeu
the TO advancesaid that that was question: W
which a Philadelphia lawyer would nave 10 De sum
mOned: il was perfectly unintelgOle thAt the WY
ness could not answer IL. Now, appeal 10 you lat iy
question was perfectly inteliglOe one Inc 'ou,t
however, TO my rescue, anu. Nc
that clearness and lucIdnesS Tor winch ny
is perfectly remarkable-the state OF NeW-foruh u
don't furnish his superior tins cay III ip'
came 10 my rescue, and put the question nmse!i
portion of any Of these bills Is false bu1 st
lodged ana eyaded the question. Why was ~ 4" ' ",
because he knew the danger OF getting INTO ue1ss
have a right 10 take that into consideraton Ine SnN
sci for the defense said. why don't they call brauley
Because the occurrence would cali nun 10 tSs.n
to- never occurred. John Garvey says Mr INeeo anu m
Bradley were in a carriage together at Albany; anu "
prevent Bradley being witness against hllI ne
If Itself is sufficient reason why didn't eau nm BIT
Graham then thanked the Court and jury for their at
tention closed his argument AS was d ~" niN
utes after !, recess was taken.