The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-07-23

SWe8r8
that DENIM told fnm he lived In Jersey City.
We Would Dennng tel that v to Mcwams II
Ne Sos S% DID aer
the 9th OF May to the 26th they broke through the
upper up vault at spot that was not often seen by
this perioo OF seventeen days Doyle was Ill with
snnaIpox. Dr. hutchns swears that on the 18th OF
tsaw Doyle at the station house on the 2sd. This
SHOWS that Doyle was then able to be out. There
unable to go ont after the 10Th of May. IL is now
remarkable that after the committaI Of the bur-
glars DENIM said that II he could get second ex-
| PUT HIMSELF IN BETTER LIGHT.
HOW cq p he 40 80 Il not by showing that the
himself il better light NeIs eAS ina u pd p%s
posis name Jnon A low d did A sSs9inf knows os
who %Jo oi was II he were not intimate
MIN. The answer to this telegram was
that he az s SO 20 McW
liams. McWnliams swears that Doyle never gave
It to him. Which Of the two VIII you believer tits
undeniable that Ahern was friend OF the burglars
since he manifested 80 much anxiety to have
another examination. How. Is. 1t. that DOYLE and
| burglars at such an early dates Mr.. Garretson
then called attention attention, to portion Of tue
when he swore thai he spoke to Proctor about the
latter speaking to the Captain concerning him.
Proctor swore to the same thing on this trial and
M'wILIIAMs' SWORN STATEMENTS
verted to the conduct OF McWiliams in not arrest
ing DENIM when he first met him, knowing, as he
large reward va had been osred Why ad no;
McWillams for sake OF that reward, arrest Denning
when he met himf McWilIiams when he obtained
from Young the pass to see Denntng In jail, pre-
tened that he wanted to see him about this MUIR
der. Was DENIM likely to give information that
would convict himself and lead TO his death, or
would he tell anything to duplicate his friend
FORESTER, who o. course, had nothing TO do with
know more about the murder than when he was
met BY McWilams at the ferryf Was 1t this that
or0uGnt poyie 10 see tue prisoners Romano tells
a. ne came out. -.q .H7Y11
HE NIGHT WELL TRExBLE
II ne were Oman GRAND in COLLISION with the men.
During the trial OF burglars Doyle was an attentive
listener in this Court House, although he had no
Doyle sent letter to Frank, as we assert. the
| letter. demanded an answer through Mr.. Winfield,
Win yS esSns Wsen To-
Denning. Nj. Gafretson then exhibited the
LETTER to the Jurors showing the striking
and the handwriting which Doyle, made while
on the witness stand. The ...'as" and ..gs" were
both In Doyles despatch and in the letter. II the
letter were forgery ~ wonld implicate McWn-
the burglars. But who would be likely to Jorge
that letter. Would Mrs. Devereux Jorge ltf She
could not write to Denning. because Proctor was
forged Doyle's writing he or she would initiate as
lar as possible, the penmanship OF Doyle. such is
not done In this letter, because some OF 1t Is writ
do. And now comes the
an.ex Chief OF Police an ex. olcer OF this Court.
Justice OF the Peace, who was employed by the
District Attorney to 60 and hear conversation
At first an energetic attempt was made to blacken
his character, but it failed On hts testimony the
anything ne done TO nulltly his statement
Il would speedily be done. The sans thing
testimony. The only witness to contradict them is
Doyle. Look at his statement. He goes In and
%s sns 1 letter ter about ut she went
to the window, heard no step coming and then told
am that That she nad yet received no Letter. After
the object of his VISIT but left her without arrang-
Ing to get any further information OF CummIna;
nor did he express the least Indignation when
SHE ACCUSED M'wILLIAMs
Of robblng the bank Mrs. Devereux is also said
to him, II have facltes for getting letters out Of
the JAIL" Would she tell this to man whose duty
70 ie o5s e the 20 @ o
pare line OF defence. Would she tell this to him
Il he were uniriendly to her and the Durgarss
Aner has arrest he lied to Deputy Sheriff Cronan
and escaped through window; then lied to Kill
canley BY saying he was going 70 his sisters.
YORK 'A' in night nom il Justice he a prev pre-.
tends to have been on his way to Montreal
very proper mission But why I sen.
did he telegraph irom Port Henry-"I think have
aone wTUng There was mo- wrong IN
ticket, he gives false name and goes out OF his
way to Boston, in order to conceal himself The
crime o man may JUSTIFY his fs whe Cubic E
clamor has been excited against him. 1t was just
the reverse In the case Of McWillIams. His excuse
is that he was drunk. For druukard he managed
ESCAPE WITH SINGULAR ADRoIrNEss.
Mrs. Devereux speaks OF having manifested great
anxiety while In company with McWillIams. Is 1t
likely, as McWiiliams states, that she was 80 ex:
tremely anxious to see Cummings arrested or
what benefit could the arrest OF Cummings be to
Mrs. Devereux's brotherf When McWiliams re-
ceived the FIRST intimation in Philadelpna that the
band was In danger why did he not return Mr.
Young says that McWiliams told HIM that he did
m the ser m wears Sa
he told her the same thing but he actually got the
despatch, and did not return when he got 1t, and
his only excuse for not returning is that he had
made an engagement 10 ride through the Park
next day. And now to revert to tue motives OF
concoct this story against Mcwilliams & Doyle?
Neither OF them had ANYTHING to do with the ar
rest OF the thieves. nthey
WANTED TO Crafty A SPITE
McHorney, who arrested them would be the object
OF tnat spite. But they took no action against Nc
Horney. Thieves have no Ill feeling against ofcals
that display no bitterness against them, because
they know 1t s the business and duty OF ofrclals
c0ncocted this in order to errify the accused into
an endeavor to free them, why then should they
did he use any exertiOns to bring them to Justice
Far be 1t nom me TO en6eavor to fasten guilt upon
innocent men. l never would have commenced
this prosecution at the cost OF so much energy and
labor were not fully conscious both Of their guilt
and Of my own. duty to the community. The District
Attorney closed his grafton with an eloquent
and vigorous appeal to the jurors to dis
pei ali sympathies and. prejndices in
their deliberations. His speech occupied more
silence prevailed throughout the court room.
Whether the jurors caught the thread OF his almost
resistess array OF arguments time alone can re-
veal. To-day, counsel for defence win sum mp. Mr..
Gilchrst will close on behalf OF the State, and then
the case win be given to the jury by Judge Scud-
der who has manifested great patience during the
trial. Bets are onered by 1.-THE knowing ones' on
the reault q this second in tiUa tion