Belmont chronicle. [volume] (St. Clairsville, Ohio) 1855-1973, 1873-12-18

Stephen J Brown VS. Della Brown
Heard on the answer and cross petition
of defendant, and reply OF plaintiff
Divorce granted on the ground OF ex
treme cruelty and gross Neglect Of du
ty of plaintiff to defendant. s30e at
mony allowed.
State of Ohio VS. Isaac Bartlett. Glana
larceny. Verdict guilty in manne.
l. ead form as charged in the first count
Haf t6le indictment, and mot guilty rs
i4oths second count. Jury find the
value ,f the stolen property is $1,000.
Thadess w Arnett VS. VIM Clark, ct
al. Court Asad the equities of this case
ara in favor Of plaintiff. Ordered that
defendant execute to plaintiff a deed
for the property ip question, upon the
plaintiff paying or securing to be paid
the purchase money cue thereon. Or
dered that plaintiff payithe costs ofthis
proceeding.
Ohio vs. VIM HOlmes-Grand IiaEee-
ny. The State introduced evidence
tending to show distinct Iarcenies by!
defendant, on the 10th, 18th and 14thi
days of May, 1873. The Court required
the Attorney for the State to elect as tos
which of said offenses he will prosecute.
The Attorney for the State then elect
ed to prosecute as to the larceny al
legged to have been committed on the
10th day of May, and there being no
proof of any larceny on the 10th day of
May, the jury under charge of the
Court, rendered their verdict of Not
guilty as he stands charged in the in
dictment-whereupOn, upon affidavit
before Justice Neiswanger, the defend
ant was Immediately re-arrested, and
in default of bail was remanded to Jail.
Highleyman & Son VS. Creamer &
Weeks. Judgment for defendants
upon report of referee for the sum of
l,07. Ordered that plaintiffs pay
costs.
Mary Burke VS. G. & P. r. R. Co.
Heard on motion OF defendant to set
aside verdict In this case and for a new
trial. Motion Overruled; defendant eX-
cepts. ---.
Patrick Curran VS. Crozier & Bro.
Heard on motion Of defendant to set
aside the verdict in this case, and for a
new trial. Motion overruled; defend
ants except.
Joseph Medill VS. De Lafayette West,
| ct ux. Judgment in favor of plaintiff
for the sum of 81 ,852,S8 and costs.
John Kirker VS. B. q o. r, r. Co,
Tried to Court; judgment in favor of
defendant. Ordered that the plaintiff
pay the costs of this action.
Oliver Tarbet, Admir-, vs VIM A
Wise, Exr. Heard on petition iu er-
ror, and the transcript of the record
and proceedings of the Justice of the
Peace. Court find no error in said pro-
ceedings, and affirm the same at the
costs of the plaintiff in error; and this
cause is remanded to said Jnstice for
further proceedings. Plaintiff in error
excepts.
In the matter of the assignment of
J III Smith. Heard on appeal from
Probate Court; appeal dismissed at
costs of appellants. Appellants, by
counsel, except.
Ohio VS.. John Stephens. Defendant
discharged; recognized in the sum of
500 to appear at the next term of this
| Court.
Ohio VS. E ] Maloy. Defendant dis
charged upon his recognizance in the
sum of $500, with James Holland as his
surety, to appear at The next term OF
this Court.
Robert Hutchison VS. r Alexander.
Report of Referees confirmed.
4 Blowers vs Blowers. Divorce. Plain.
tiffallowed $500 alimony, and to be re-
stored to her full rights in all joint
property.
German Lutheral Church VS. Bellaire
Ag. Machine Works. Vendors lien
ALLOWED.
1