, 1873-02-25

ct tic certificate, with notice to the counnav. CO..
ferrcd projections against creditors Of IN
sna restrained TIC Company from tr:nstcrrr7 or &C,
ss2s5g t. ,;! ''n tssaafr to any oer party, we il
fau>.ant IS be.wcen him and tho Assigned ia INV
after the transfer although hot
3.c5 focq ae bltTa2a the par.ics tho duty ettac}.
- aa4i y United States insurance Company. al
cate paa assessment witlout beIn, 1eg3ere ced
repaired br the charter ho WAS esc7Ecd fror,
up 1asa ~ ~nt Ct registry in action afierwsr
~ A2d ACKNOWLEDGED Lis Obligation and was lieh;e 2
ies rssiserez esaiRaez stos:h2'asF without 10
these principles, and the equitable oblicat;on ~ u,
o1sa @ TO pay subsequent nssess1nants sgh. oyj
o, m94sl ~ M BY e corporation aat
sufficient to Change the equitable relation into i,c,
one 60 Is to mako The purchaser abe directly to Iii
Jury IN this might have been warranted 1, ~ ~
t2m, n uniting tho defendant stockholdcr
| aeo ~ 70 MN. Iae Company, after registering int
~ a. such would bo estoppcd from setting up tat
tre m transfer was not made; after having regis.
collect of the original holder future assessmenta or
oe auo~ed to question tho su1c,eucy Of tho rsgiun
1: Eent. The conaiany having accepted aud g,Ibstf
| tuted another party az Btocshoder, tho 1iahiIitv
Of Tue original subscriber ought to terminate with nis
Tents Is s:eckoder {tathorittes> In ts case, tic
|
bylaws and not in tho charter, aud it may be ta it's
is not rs Indispensable to vest tho title in
tArthorities). Certain principal faca were nr1ren
nos admitting O. doutts controversy while Certain
oaess were proven ae themselves decisive, but for1n-
las foundation of 1nfereacez conclusions which
wle Tor the jury find. take Ii, tho jury ahoid
ua :on th: eFldsncc and conduct Of the parties that
tscy beth waived formal tzaaEfcr mid scquiesceI in
,ae one proven as sufficient, that they would both he
nouno oy T. In view Of these considerations ihfnF
tnat lew trial should be granted.
~ 111ohSEf CHARGED WITH D1sanAcEFU1
IN petition for caplas yesterday, fled in tho
Circuit Court, Caroline Daniels, being firat div
s"orn, declares and says upon oath that On ~
Toont % ahe 7st Day OF APril. 1872 afEiant employed
s,1lt gu IN chancery in the Superior Court Of Cook
ooua1y, IN which Harriet a. Tyler ct, al were
complslnents, and Caroline Daniels ct al. were
ae1enasnts, agreeing to pay to said Leary for lis
~ ~ f!ces 1or tne 1ul defense of said cause until
lls nnal disposition the sum of 800: that sho
paio the sum Of $50, on account. on the 6th ri
inat month, when Leary said that she must nav
MN MN s5.5 moro for defendants costs, to be paid
9 Gy nm to the Clerk Of the Superior Court, which
ne would not otherwise onter his appearance
1or her. Leary at a later date stated that |
sae must advance S15 to obtain an abstract Of |
the lands involved In the suit, which she also |
tneeoueu TO- sne aiIms that, from inquiry sub
sequently made, che has discovered tllat Leary |
neither pa1d the above, nor any costs in the case
to the Superior Court Clark and that be did not
OBTAIN an abstract from any source whatever.
nor 1 Pay anything therefor; and she charges that
lraudulentlJ applied them to his own uses She
furthor atfr1ns that on the 7th of June last she
Pa1d said Leary the SUN Of 925 on account OF his |
lees, on @ the LIST Of August 915, and on the I'd OF
August s27, or SIT il al more than she had
1sreod, she having made mistake in the
She charges that the only services
performed by Lea1y in return for this
money we're as follows: The writing
+ compa,pf p ef nhisb ~as to hot the biz
md IN which he took no farther steps, the Value
Il Which services, she is professionally in
ormed, does not exceed $40. On Aug. 2,
1eary is alleged to have told this complainant !
the defendants, and that tho complainant
"a appealed to the Supreme Court, that he must
teend the Supreme Court therein, and file | {
r1nted br1efs, which would cost 1900, and that +
ehement assertions as to the necessity to her
terests Of this being dene forthwith, ahe did:
1t she charges that she has now discovered
at "a said Leary has taken no further steps in
Ii had no brief printed, and paid out
money whatever on account Of her F
use She concludes by charging fraud and a.
debtedness to the extent of s210.60; that she
about to commence an action at law for the :.
covery Of the money which she has reason to K
leve will be lost without said Leary be arrest ct
, and, therefore, prays a capias which was b
ued yesterday afternoon.
TIE NIXON A.pH11HEArRE n COURT. C
Noble '; Nixon, before Judge Rogers, Was tried in
yesterday, and given to the Jury in the even OF
;. This was forcible detainer suit for elect
mt from the Nixon Amphithoatre building. n
q complainant had rented the building 70 r.
kon for four weeks, with proviso to continue Sl
one year certain at 4 rental of $4,000 il the -.
ties should agree at the close Of the four
eks' probation. Liking tbs place, Nixon claims {e
have been ready to proceed with the tonancy. ~
accordingly laid out not less than $4,000, o.
Noble eTaded the execution Of the deed BY
ading that the bonds we're not those that had | cd
\ agreed upon To this defendant answered ia
II the bondsmen we're not the ea1ne thev nj,
q as good, if not bettor. an
BANKRUPTCY MATTERS. !
: the matter of the Republic Insurance Com g.,
terday, to the petition Of the Assignee, He "a, 90
les that the District Court alone ought to ! a. a.
> on the issues involved in his suit ee ainst O>
Company. !
a petition for the adjudication Of Afitchell Ch
On, OF Lemont claiming as creditors on an III
. account for $6s2.40, and affirming that the an
'o.s made an assignment to a. Roebuck d. !
o. their stock for a pretended consideration cha
Is being mixed indistinguishably with those aft,
-Roobuck d Son; and further, With allowing ia =
proceedings to be entered against -
II auo MAKING VARIOUS preferential | ~ /
nents. Their debts exceed $1,000. CO.
their assets consisted OF the assigned stock Sta
3 farm nortgaged for nearly its full value. hou
usual rule to show cause Was entered. nue.
Walker, OF this city, yesterday fled TAX
luntary petition in bankruptcy r
10 adjudication Of J. 4. Elligon wns yester- this
set aside, and five days given to answer Tor
e olue1 1or examination, under Sec. 26, in Pa11
Noyes, ct al made for the 18th and post eelo
q, was extended tlll to-day. 1icit
ave to file petition in the Superior Court, m
10 Waters. l. ca, in tha matter - &C., pita
lien. thai
x JncoT,v and Zel1ar vaa+ard., 6,o5 rece
entail petition against Raphael J. Prins, iGa,. tqa
ing as creditors five notes. respectively. nr eiat
55:06, e516.6s, e472 .s642.54, and s45525. tot
allege, as an act Of bankruptcy, the trans- &<4V. &
debtors estate to Ey s. Haas and John nou'
1son, to defeat the other creditors. Under IT
or application, in tie came matter, the Lite
directed an examination Of Prins US to the enio
Z charged against him, under Soc. &c. essa