, 1873-01-15


tereat At 10 por cont payable half yearly, and
that to secure tho paynlont Of aela note said
Hart executed hts mortgage to said firm. Of oven
date NTH the motto, Of tho aoushweat quarter Of
psedsd pssa ths asFnshP 0. tTIsssS sseSSd I
made In tho payment OF interest tho
whole amount Of tho note should become duo
and payable, and might DO proceoded for by tho
boon paid on tho debt since Juno, 1906 that
Fart died intestate on tho I'd August, 1869, hav-
Ing; apparently rolinquiBhod all intontion Of
making any fu1thor paynents on ACCOUNT o9 the
this suit, havo displayed oqnal indinorenco;
and tho Court is prayed to DECLARE tho indebted
noss as stated, and order the salo of thc property
to satisfy tho !claim Thcro arc unsstisaed claims
on formor docaion Of tic Circuit Court, to tho
Supreme Court, and by the latter remaudod to "
tho Circuit Court; and all tho papers that wore
destroyed by fro wore yeatorday ordorod
John Cochrano, for tho use Of George H.
Rozet, yesterday commenced suit in tho bupo-
rior Court in assumpsit, $4,000, againat. tho
scs Ma9cs 1p a4pa 9Smay & sP9a PaSy of oh In
Bradnnr Smith, on No. 100 Rush street, said
policy being indoreed, Jan. 25,, 1870. LosH II
any, payable to John ,0ochranc, as hts intorost
as to Fl; b s aed
June Il, 1860, J. 3: Smiths interest being trans-
forred to George Il. nozct
Tho injunction obtained by Mr.. Sherlock. Of
Winnotka, restraining tho collection Of ta1cs
naseueod for tho payment of tho now school
bonds, was yesterday dissolved, and tho COM
plainant directed to pay the oost Of tho injunc-
tion and damages caused thereby; total, ss85.
This oktraordlnary easo NJ wll b: b. tresh IN the
built school with funds raised by bonds spo-
oially Issued for the purpose, and the complain
ant, by his representations Of improper pro-
coedings, illcgality, eto procured temporary
it73St }I{u
TWO LARGE vEnD1CTH.
The suit against Harlan Il. Peck, for assoss-
montB on shares In tic bankrupt Groat Western
Insurance Company wss yostEsrsjy d. concluded,
| Tho noxt cnao tried was tho eamo Company
! against Mary A. Sawyer, for 90, 100. Mrs. saw-
| yer VAS unshakeablo in her position that sho
had never bought tho share, that they had never
sho had mover had any desire to hold them. The
| difficulty with the prosecution was that the
shares had no name upon them, although In tho
| books Of the Company they wore shown to DO in
cution clinehed tho matter by showing that tho
| lady had received tiiVdonls upon the very stock
she now repudiated. That settled all doubts.
aud the jury found for tho full amount
claimed.
The great railroad axle patent case, Sleeper v.
Miltimore, ct al., which no have 30 often ro-
ported that it must hy this time be perfectly
|
by Judge Farweu, who .mado tho following
order It is hereby ordered that the injunction
| hereinboforo issued be 30 modified rs to operate
to restrain the defendants from SO selling, IT..
patent which have been or may hereafter bo
issued to tho United StatoB, for tho invention or
improvement In tho bill Of tho complainant mon
toned, or Of my rights in said invention OF i'm
or suffering tho Same to be done
as to in any Way interfere With tho.right Of tho
| complainant III aGid invention here Or elsewhere
than in tho United States to the e1tent Of one
| fourth interest thereon, until the flu Il decree
| herein in respect thereto be prepared.
l DIyoncE MATTERS.
I Tho Perrine divorce suit, commenced on tho
I 10th inst, vent before tho reporters could see
was returned with . complete report to tho
Court yesterday, tho report nubrnittod to Judge
| Gary In the forenoon, and divorce immediately
granted, oil within 100 hours. The wife testified
and asked her husband for money; that her
husband went out on tho sidewalk to talk witt.
her, and that shc Ind the appearance Of lewd
woman. 4 friend Of hia wife proved Rooine
and that, on charging him with its being house
| Of owl repute, ho acknowledged that be- had q
girl there with whom ho had beon having Rome
fun. AL this occurred. about mouth ago. and
apparently agreed thnt tloy can bo happier
epart, whether the example may DO conducive tt
tho increase Of American morality or not.
In the divorce suit, Mary y. John Savage,
change Of venuo WAS yesterday 6rantou to Lakt
County by Judge Williams.
THE CICERO INJUNCTION Butt.
Tho following letter ia gladly g1yen space u
this column. The shrewd Committee seem t.
prepared for Tho meeting which1 they oxpcotod
would have been held before this
70 tho Editor af Tho Chicago Tribune:
day, hesded The treasurer Of cicero md Tho So %
bonds" tho undersigned werc appointed bpocia
accouna and had not boon hbla to get togcher there
fore, tho action Of the petitioners waa rahor hnsty
npsse noqe
had tho Board Of Trustees any intention Of granting
, anything more than what was Just and legal.
ssss s;';s +: Ss:$ss$' S::: S$s;::s@; Committee,
CALL TODAY.
:, tbs partiap DO not present themselves tic jur
will probably be discharged.
, Judge Blodgett will proceed with motions, an
Judge Porter calls 50, "a, IS, SO, 81, 8s, 80, Q
B to %, inclusive.
: Judge Rogers calls 81 to 40, inclusive. Brow
t v. 6nell on trial.
: Judge Tree will try 5o,-Gerhordt Y. Lampa,
4 tor.
: m1scELLANEoua NOTES.
4 loan Of 5000, obtained in 1864, is now a
r indebtedness Of $14 600, including interest an
: outlays, for which sum tho lenders yesterda
+ commenced suit in tho United s1ates Circu
!, Court. The plaintiff, Frank A. Day, Of Musc
:, tine. Iowa, alleges in his bill that he III
: acquired from Thomas Brayton aud San
= uel Halle, Of Now York, the mo-
i OF Peter Boyce, Of Morley, Missouri, for $500
Il together with q mortgage to secure tho sam
gi7on BY Benjamin and Nancy Doyco, Of Or
l. gon, Illinois. He deslres to foreclo.e, aa II
|, property Ia but acant security for tho enoun
4 brancoa now on 1t.
: :: IL tho District Court, yesterday, Il number I
y suits woro brought by creditors Of lie scow Il
II. bloom, to recover against tho proceeds Of "a
y y OF that vessel; and Clark Lipo and John !
y Nelson brought suit againnt Charlos Fitzsil
mons, to recover s254.78, the value Of freight
y cargo Of lumber pcr scow Harriet Ann.
d Solicitors practising in tho United States Dl
J. trict Court hro informed that only ono Jury ca
q remains for trial before Judge Hopkins, ind
Q the parties arc not III Court today. The jitry "
o be discharged. Tho case III question is NIurpl
O Y. Zoos.