, 1873-09-27
THE SUPREME COURT.

Special Di.patrh 10 Tho Chftago Tribune.
orTAwA Sept. 20.-Thc Supreme Court met at tho
usnal hour, O'Clock IN. Present, the Hon. Sidney
brcesc, ohcf Justice, aud Associate Justices Walker
McAster, Scott, Sheldon, scho1ncld. and Craig. Tho
business transacted follows:
ny atI JUSTICE M,ALL1arEn.
t47 548 649, b50. 551-A1lchae Good Y. Trustees Of
the Town Of Alcdo. Theso wero nppealcd by the
sa1nc appellant. Aprellee's counsel, without affidavit
suggests Tho death Of appellant, tho name OF IN a-
niuisratrix and moves that the appeal bo dismissed
for wat Of rkoBccution This IL not proper PRACTICE
Tho application should DO supported by affidavit and
be for rus upon the person shown to bo ad.ninis-
tratrIx, to show cause, by tino stated, why tho a-
peaa shold not 10 dismissed; Which ruo should 10
personally served On tho representative and give a
denied.
III NH. JUSTICE soorT.
2t0-Orin D. Howell, survivor, &c., Va. Horace N,
Goodrich Motion to sriko bill Of exceptions from
the ,nsp@M M for The oo4 n9
This constitutes no reason for striking tho bill Of
exceptions from tho record, and the motion viii 10
denied.
1u the Same motion ts mado by appellant to
extend tho time for filing brlefA aud abstracts. For
the reasons indicated In the affidavit, the time will be
extended twenty days.
48-cecilia o'connor. imp!eadcd with Albert John
continued for want Of service. Tle other party now
entered motion 10 sot aside TINT order, mud In np-
stating TINT there Service Wo do not regard this
return, anything Tint thu law recogaizea aa
return u y ~ not M iHaossed On the witt but is simply
b9-reora l. Hook 1Alund halfway Company " The
Con coal Valley Mining Company: IN hs caso the appel
ant oaks fos further no to e briefs. The time will
6A6-John II. Mccormick '. William L. uuse In
this suggestion nude that the Court In nre-
pairing ~ oFioi,. had aetea upon msapprshension lion
Ut tho factS III the case. In preparing the opinion wo
found two counts IN the dcclaratton We also foi,nt
patents wore tHslca fur two small tracts OF und and
It was supposed TINT each patent was for separate
traot Of lard In examining tho declaration We ind
lint TINT waa mlsaprehcnsson Of the fact, and, lind
Ing out is mistake, tho Court WILL on ita own motlot
sward reoArng, and counsel on each side viii AsYc
III opportunity to flo briefs.
Ax s1R. CHIEF Iu8rlcE pAEE8E,
20a-Henry Fuller Y. John q. Little et al. On tho
lth Of this month motion was nude for extension
wara the appalleo moved to dismiss tl4o appeal, and
at tho same the sd j. big e.. sggesons lhsse
tho callse Tho questions presented Of 30 much
Importance that we deem 1t ezpedlont TO hear tho1
argued, md the motion to dIsaiaa the appeal viii
therefore le reserved for consideration tho hearing
ANMIRHI0HH TO PRACTICE.
nreose oh j., stated Tint tho papers In relation 10
Vun Syckel were found to bo correct, and uCeuscs
would aAue.
NEW nuIEs
"ordsred-Tl!at tho Clark Of lula Court be required !,
at each tGrm to acke al petitions tor rohearuH sop
-i, ttI III ess s!ss II ha'1 s oort when tho d.
fendant desires tn plead and nut join III error o shn
t,le susl PLEA n tho ollso Of tho Clerk At eaat lyo
days bofUro tho aanlla for trial, aud Tho issue
thereon must bc nlado up before tho day the CAUSE
NEW aoTIoNa.
13-Tho Catholic nIylup Of Chicago ', ChArlos Chin-
1qny OF a. Motion M to dlsn'!s4 writ 1T error.
no ~ rs.S wsssks ct ~ JGnann ~, tam6fs Dm
which 1 to S,tn supply, ~ Isr stimulation M tl'o1.
remand tla cause on suggestions aud aldavita led
297@Willsatn 7. Kerr, 'mpleatsl, etc., y. oornelia