, 1873-12-31
STATE TAXES.
Another Injunction Prayed
Against Collector Clcary.
Tho Chamber Of Commtrto 0bjctts to Its Assessment
Tor Several Reasons.

Chamber of Commerce OF tito CitY OF ClttQRO.
voatcr,1av atcd = h,lf in tho 1,rcu,t court
s,..a. y ~ c,.. a.,I..s e.. o",..,, r,.,aa
nRual6' r. H. oioaey. oonnotor 1o1 ooatii onlo"-
60, to enjon him from collecting tho bthte Hnd
county ta1os Oh thoir property for tho yoar
1873,
MI, hi, .totos +,,,t ,to oo.,,,r,t,,,, ovra t,,n
A"o o''A S'aso' LII" '"o WI Po."''o' o"", wv
pfoPorsy on the corner OF washington anu LII
Ballo etroeta. and that 1t was duly Assessed by
tho town assessor ut S112 600, which assessment
tho con,,,v Rand ~ ror,,i,nt,o, r.Iucnd II \
Wv o'y non1u y, t,au.''.eanou 'ouu1.a
per cont. ine so'ealoa stato boasu OF Eana1-
zation, pretending to not unflcr tho novonuo law
cor,ifc1 tia h tho Aud;tor ,vho cor,,fod II tn
49, O.,..t. 1,su,' -, H. 80, " C,.s,A ~. ~
.uo oo"uHs o.o!A' "ou 1no oouu.s otolA Ing oH7
e. 1onaeo tNo tax upon tn's ii1cfeasea asaeSament.
State board, IN increasing tho assossment Was Yes
wltnoat examination as 70 tho Vai.to !, ~ Ing
property. without taking testimony, aEd wltho lit
gyng notice &C. oi az a. intention na R t9 charge tho
vAlnatlon; anq tnat tue noara alu no1, IN my
mannor I aotu9lly value tue property N pfggpor, g
tion to the vni1ie Of other property IN tho Town
OF South Chicago, N order 70 determine the pro
portlon o. taxos Tor etato purposes 1or tno
yeAr !eI3' tho only pefhon VINO roaily
asce5laned sho value nolng tho Iown a. Asaoa10r
nhinpoachca' inns hctoh q tne ntaso poara
10. therefore. alleged 20 20 Illegal anu hni1 ana
Volu. Inc oonnty ClerA nas coaluteu ~, tuo
aeaie goa15 oW ao patH tInes 5 tn's ns
issued = warrant in duo form of law, for thoir
collectlon, a'la Inc oouec1or euieatehs W pro.
cooa 70 coiioet the taAes anu ~, .n9y aEe hos
pala, no WI! plase tao warrant H. IN t,o nanqs ol
esaI on a ,sn iace te Gos'ty collector wa1i pro-
eeea ~ coeG. tt 'n1 lux ~ nma eae ,n ~
smor sS epa. ~" nrx s1o W."
sunnl n,'s u !tl1l'htap'o y ",snly;
The state t,; b1ara OF E1ua!izasiop: claiming to
aes uuer th's hosoann la" Saiae1 eS. tmo Polsona1
ptopeTty VI tno eo4i,aluank a. so'o,ouv, aua A.
seseea tho tax Tor 1919 Oh thas valuation. Ihe
@ cohplatnan. ID not aaytsoa' auu nas hot peon
M ao!n u ascor'n Tue uasis upon Wnlgh tnis va.
TUG supposed maiket value of tho capital STUCK,
aho ucauoteu .aeroltom ING assessed Vhluo or
lss feat osthto, the a.aouht remaining, nclns tue
eash value m 70 Of the cnpl.al stoon, wIlch WIS ~
1So o only preery 'nS e @ ~ tie q
III Whien II mas any interest,", +, 10 tho real
estate aireaay montiohoa. 1Ao cotnplaln.
ans catflos on no oaslncss nnaor It's
charcr Of Incorporation, aud It's franchise, Us q
corporation IL OF nttlo or no vai0ei anu ls hot
Taxable; . Its oaPtal gtocH rsl'ieseata only tile
vnlre OF tue real oBtato, and tho complainant
Ought not to DO required to pay faxcs upou both
iIs real estate, as such aud lts o canital stock
into 9ona shares, tho rar value q which y sloo
each. Ihe stock Is owned BY large nnm1er me- Of
persons, many living out OF tae State Of Illinois,
mud tho stock, II taxablo at all (Which ls denscd
Is taSaple Oh tue porsonal pfonorty OF tho
owners. 1t IL Gainea TINT tho as assessment
OF tho cap!tal stock by tho State
noara IL vl1!aaon Of ART; y. sec; Of tho con-
stltutlon OF tue State; and tiat tho asscssmont,
IT inforcod, would require llo complainant to
pay dlsproporttlona:e aud double tsS upon Its
property; and TINT tho acts OF tue Board arc,
therefore, null anu void, alu ought to DO 10 de-
claIeu ny thn Court' !, -.
Iho oomplainant oo1eVes that tue 1Ieyonue
.aw 30 iar nh u purporta 20 authorize the Board
shat n tho az attempted 60 confer npon tie State
boara !aalcla! powers, w'1n aushorIy TO PRO
hounee 1a!gment a6alnee tho properly oI tho
oltlzen, "ltnous nouee, ona que PROCESS ol my;
AttGmntfH