, 1873-09-22
An Alleged Fraudulent Partner
Sued for $4,000.
Damages Asked Against the @. {; P. r.
4. for Laying Track.
Stcp-M0t1lcr III Trouble. bankruptcy
NInltcrs-.-,Tllo Courts III Brief.
Proceedings in tho Supreme Court on
Saturday.

tho Circuit Court. by Charlc. Kraun, against Marcus
NrDn,,crr II nnnears from t}n br That Krauss b.
como nco,,,r,oi viii, afnn,ont aomo t,mo In 1900
III 1863 defendant ,lao nh otor to no into 1urtnersp
with cum,,}.t,nut In chtrot, In t,n tcuc}ry b,,spesH
whc was arccntc1 IN lin following tertns s,bstnn-
n,, rsr,,r arm w,u IN f,,r,,th nj ths voo,]a from
hta Snw yr, ,v,,o,c,n, houao NJ w,o,osa,c nr;ros
.on,v,,,,.t wuu n. ,vo n1, ,,a t,a n, skill, hc he
Ing n rrsctical werkuan: tho o1pcuses wcro
10 la na,a mt pf the rcceIu,a
mn, tho net prorts ,iyi1c5 coua,lv. and
lin ,orar,nors,ir tn rr,t,u,o two ro,ra ann half
IN ,,n cx,rnt,n, of thu, linn tha ,,,rnoratn wns
rcrcwcf far ,,,o ner,o0 mid IN rsrt 1,na continued
M 1o,,t Nm nrsont i'm, A. III, lin, f tbc r. tho
,,rt,, ,v,r, =, NJ ,5n fr, at,opt ,,t .Incn to hnvo
naf.'ca %ere .. ~" 's oark s'eet, oo nA'o
oeea' al NO. 1ol "cst Matia'u stfee''
from tho New York house and Of ali saos nalo hore
nd Of all expenses incurred aud complainant cant'ot
esao e1"ety tno conal''nh OF TUG coPaFlnossn ou',
~ near AZ he recollecs, tho business was commenced
with s2oOo worth Of goo'1s, aud Increased to about
MI, ,h.n. Gin = ,eor from I'm arm
nn'y anou' su "seA .soa .0e4 .4' ~. ~"
fundA On til Q 1st OF Janlary, 1667, lAron-
berg made abatement showing prodt from tho com.
management 10 1861 Of st4o7 so ha1f Of which belongs
IN cn,n,,o,nnut Int In thinks lint ann IN rons,drr
e'.l1""'n,'' oa' ~ ."hs @ snu. H"t' ~ nan ~,
ably too small From Jan. !. 1867, to Jan l. 1872 tho
,rjhrh ,,as nj ,n;a t 1rfe,ans c,cept sisas
no, ont ~ stnr, eyncn.o, md s77a IL mad hy de-
EA'u out us s'ofe eAlelscs III" p.eoae une" ~ "s
fer.lant. thus paying defendant 1851 20 moro than
was due him. "a 10 having been paid for goods
s'g New NY YORK. s,. nroo,s ~, ~. ,,,,.
These swo sums sepfesohtng pFo"ts e'a no1 inc.uuo
% ins present tino has pcrn good, and complainant
Ds" oa s s9s a "s' susea ss sssnaan and pa
him MI sums received without taking any voucher;
but he s been atsy a RT'nSes ~ a'1 has for
se"'' 1,s,'" 49, na,., "" J.. 49,. @ ,.,,.
nasng 1 % fass s entriea % IL "' ths @ eopar.nosup n
Accounts md iii particular that on Aug
So 49, ~ ~ 49, o '1 s
amounting to nbont Sls,eoo. Frequently, moreover,
neu goods d ,e1asa no i1ea wSna Dt allowed
On III Siarch ie is12, .he defondant represented to
:romllanant that he {so.npsinanp haa lsswa up to
sg ss hut hut 1s tut 9 sssas ss sea 9a give
aefenia, tlcn reehargoI it 10 complainant,
On r vth Of September, 1879. Krauss gave tofeul-
ha y ns 70
gayo Tie reason rs lla had When Obtaining tle
ro,naant In addition 10 tic note, aatl Oh lie 2ia of
MAY 1871 ho entered II again long list Of personal
,s t r hs e s11 a 4n iItro wan firm osr
ance in tho London, Liverpool l. G!obo Company,
Tue dsfsnlants ghSlsHa5e plaee VA burned p ss
trade anl engaged Krauss to ront placo for him. aud
1u,u,ed ont lny uiueu hu wished The landlord asket
10uO bonus bcsitles rent Defendant bud no, TINT
ann, A1,I persuaded complainant to leave tho policy Of
noney from tie INSURANCE Company. Complainant
ss t. 9sI Ksat hrs
supposin9 TINT it had been redeemed, wont to the
liz n.1,licy vas lost. Tie officer asked
If IL was pledged. aud Krauss sa. 1t not, whcre
llou he w;.s confronted with tho landlord who nroycd
hat ho hat IT, anu that the 81 900 lad not been paid.
Ino Company paid x2,oUo, Which was Immediately
handed over to kr,nherg. Complainant alleges that
,,tet nf