, 1873-02-12

| inforencc. Tha chartor creatcs corporation In
po4son sh'
eondse t. as 1p,S pn9SS yeste r.
Ssns' Sssa 5as astea | II on'1 AlSors hsss
sPss. s'ss for Il Is wssss sss Il 0 Rni%o S t.
and for rght-of-way from ono 10 tho otor. II il NJ
truly public cnorpr1so M tho building Of railroad,
or tho supply Of town with water gas or rrovid.
incorporation nyltoa energy and skill ADD capital
nleral corporations IN tho exercise Of to,r poiice
wh tho carving On q the business which ia secured
prevent thls company and "a onpoyes from bringing
that town, ind can DECLARE the nanufactory issfF =
nuisance and sbato II what is to proyent to village
se sa &C sy q sG a. q:
along any Of their Streets Or tho running Of
sS track thC ers;tng sn maintaining Of
sas tracks, end ~ oars e ri Up tho te!egrsp
sos oss ao .se
yaa r.fa csn do thts al tho o., either towns
tra7ci and Of business which entor hero, can 30 cut,
the prosperity Of tho city destroyed, and tho com.
that tho Legislature intended to place great city
at the moroy Of its suburbs.
it, i s 6or na s ,s part not e S
bi think tho objection should not be sustained II
am corroot In the yiow which havo takcn OF tho
tbon It should protected those rights and tho de-
othor by neans of ye1asous pcrsocutions or by pro-
cocdlnga to destroy is works nderprecuce Of nbatng
nulaanee. Tho invasion ct . eorpozste fran;
may be prevented by injunction. Great and irropara-
bio da.nago would DO sustained by tho complainanta
cago, il tho detcniana wore allowed, without juat
right in tho midst Of tho packing season, TO thus sud,
Ss y sysWs y m 9s s Ih o%s Sa an S
throw buck upon tho city this vast mass of AMI
m %.S breed =, and af1h u to
bo ieis5 oontsstsd r. o9a,.: aTs opon to tho de.
trsry to tho sw and in p9ins q iso thoy aro main.
BIN could bo llod, and they could be enjoincd.
Either Of these proceedings would be natu.
IT,. tho s'a auhores Of nyao par BY % proceeang
arrest and hno tho laborers and mon employed upon
@ 9 at n ssaa a U5 19 ss1sg
bio for, and controlling tho business arc endeasoring
to DO Indirectly what they my not 40 directly
porary injunction 10 oyerrule, and tho order can 10
outored accordingly.
B1R. M1TcHoocK,
counsel for tho defendants, asked the Court to
30 modify tho injunction Us to enable tho village
to proceed consistently with tho opinion Of tho
Court. He understood it to DO conceded tint
they could provide such regulations, and enforce
Ruch police regulations as would prevent tho
Compnnya carrying on its business in q rocklosa
or negligent, manner, 80 as to mike o
nuisance when there waB no necessity Tor 1t.
The Injunction restrained all interference, and
they desired to have it so, modified thnt they
could enforce those regulations which required
tho complainunta to conduct their business prop
orly.
THE COURT SAID
TINT II tho injunction Was 80 broad as to have
that offoct, 1t should DO modified.
:; MA. HITCHCOCK
would like to hnvo tho Courd modify 1t ut onco,
believing TINT there was no difference Of opinion
botwoen counael on that subject.
Mn. 6WErT,
for tho complainants, thought that tho counsel
might ngree upon sono modification which would
suit all sides.
LIZ, SIDNEY SMITH,
for tho defendant, declined to accede to any auoh
arrangement, and tho Court finally decided to
take up tho matter this morning. to 500 whit
notifications, II any, nhall DO mado In the in
junction.