The sun., 1873-02-15
PATTERSON AND HARLAN.
THE oHRIsTyAH sTATBsMBx,s TAR
DY COEFESSION.

that Mr. Ames told him that stock had been
given TO Mr. Conkling was read, together with
the testimony Of Mr.. Ames denying that en-
phaticaliy. Mr. ConkiinU replied:
,.S:s S.s GO ss9oSse h%e 1:, S.nsS .Ss Q,
tetssi q ths credit koSer Or Pacific Rairosd Con.
ss unon Rso. sss
.ral paelnc Rs,lrosd and have never been owner
70 any extent In either.
Senator Patterson OF New Hampshire was
then called, and made the following statement
PROF. PATTERsoN's STORY.
In the nyesigatiqn By the House committee Of which
he. sna yse o,ii siaSies .ss6 s,e
Seu 20 nscn & hms. sscsa When new entered psess e
Eres BECAME Intimately associated with him In 1884
9Sn q SS1sr,: e goro1 e
macy pened nto fepd.Sp which essced pts on mu
part the utnos trust aud confidence In 1871 inuenC
% soSa !. S
gave him ispco. subsequenily, n iss, gave az sdd-
tsienen % sssS SsSs relate ,esy .
ss s bSa 'ss &c % sss Ss , ns n
,se1rliies Of the Union Pacific Raiiroad Company.
isfornsd ,h.i gen,smsn who opposed my election
ne s1: ~: sssss aT 90 assis %
public mind against that company.
THE FIRST DENIAL.
As no written memorandum passed between Mr.. Anne.
only my %emcr spP,si 70 u determining What Ssd
he sfss s %
vested "a y rs admtlsa .hs second Sss IN the stock
isforman,. very smPhstie.ly, taat was not true
sought an Interview with Mr. Ames and told him Of the
effort being made inJure me. said him, Az you
seSs Be n yG not wcsS .ls 70 H. s .a sS
H spsd s certainly In S and
only clam 10 give the snbstsnee of the words nsea
snsmttca % o v perus. Letter .d1red ~ Nm aha ~
MT Rolvn' Which was perfectly satisfactory and 90
AMrs sHnuprso PATTERSON
A@e. eIiSI aSa SS my ,i SSas mi M Rons a4rns
me what he had written to MIR. Rollins.
him ~ In1n NV nere ,n 9uoh.ea nmes ietter 20
aid not think Patterson aver had ,nv Cre,,,t No.
biiier stork and N be NM ,hst ,hs.a VII 10
Dnrs ,Dr All T., ne ~ hsa' ,nai ,here was no
BELIEVED HIMSELF INNOCENT.
rb,s coryor,s,lon r,,h M, .m,.. ana IN. latter.
when ilsao;d would have sslhra:S q ihe Sesi
hs,esd nGcs & s1d seeurts doubt had tssrei9Te
have lnauenssd 10 represent @ he sem%ii,se Or
IN county Una. my mve.tmeht was msae 10 tes Union
So lar as Cong css i. In this In, Inc
only legitimate object Is 10 ascertain whether It's
hers bad private ntere.ts In companies subject % ITS
ise nu ~ e Dasis 10, tns
esisiIiiye selon IN thls View. ihsrsiors 4 would
was In the stock OF company deriving ts charter from
state authority and having ~ ee1neetien with Son
ts srIsIses 10 ronsrrss had receiver sddSnai iess
a,ion nnt imn rob.be "A-'" NA~1s 'u' 'A'' 'es@
THE srcoNp DENIAL
Mr.. Patterson then quoted from the testimony
81 Mr. S%ei Oe1ofs s the the rpnna ,s
ferred 10 banking houss in New York by Ills
orders and resamine' said; ,....
These ss.emSn.s 9i M.; Anes 90 much IN opposition
been eopnrmed py my eonyersstlon Nh him, and by
SSiors tSs es@aiit.e theasSt ProSeT~tsa psS ps;atS
aeas to !he contrTsy T give my own
An.s nnd what haa sl.sys believed to have been the
nony was Eyen, one month after these ,tatements-
thath' on Jan H.
NoTHIso WRONG IN IT.
h.d SsSS Sa. sIc1 SsSsusS "a S ScsS .iSpPc 1@
sented SUI aot ocnasc zee any brei' OF pr0prlety
boiling 6s cfsdt Moei s1ecE more .Ssa p%psr r.
Nool, tka teeHsr eonas, osnk notes; bAnk stock or
egniation but epon whleh lcvisSt.op was not sSi.e
pated a. the time Of the purchase. Again, the same
Idea is oppressed IN the examination m reference TO
my statsment that IN the nr.t eonyersatlon eyer had
Was mentioned By him. Nv ''' ''' '''''' '''''''
Mr. Pa PstterSon snies quoted from his testimony be;
,S,s ,Sn, ,oe dts rT,H S oo@ee, whsLe % . ne ta,ed
money to do So and continuing said w " '
WIN ss.s se sG@:oSs n s Is e , my to
the subject was arst inentloned 70 me- aSswefsd he
sS OF SsofS I @ &c se se ps " %
and belief AZ inc lime Subspnuent Ia nv exaninatinn
Mr. Ames was again called 10 testifY on ian S when
In the course Of lis testimony he vs. ~ ~ "NNA
- ' ' "e
PRODUCED A REcEIrr
written as he says, by him. and signed By me dated at
Bosian May g. 1911 Again, on Jan 2o he PRODUCED IN.
y.9el tsesipa wnish a',9 MN AM signed by me,
this was 4 great surprise 10 me Knew / had given
hm receipts In one or two but had not the
slightest imp that they were
character Which they arc They were never silude
by Mr. Aiues any Of interview and they surely
been equally hey ond his o.n recollection
elec ton and tle charge male against me that was a
der in that company he said was not and so
wrote TO Mr. Rollins The receipts as Is Gen. bear dat
prior to that conv ersalion and letter cannot deny
from the inspcctiOn have made that my srnaturp 10
those papers Ia genuine aud am well awure III il 20 he
presumed had knowledge OF all the facts stated in
them. can only account for my icnorance OF their
Mr. Anes regarded hun as a friend using mi means
sened whatever he wrote without that care and
spection hch ordinar attend business
In fact This was friendiy rather tha busincrs tran
action and gave little thought 10 It's character or de.
tails. IL Is from the adinisson made OF
= .,..... : :. =. -. -.
THE 0kNUiNbNkss OF MY siufAIuhk
That Nr Anea'a as IN the ipxestp,ent ~ the
sou il sustaned and that mine l. erroneous Sepsat
now what have always ssid mat have no more oh.
Ecu9i,e 70 N tHe hoch oi thS N1eult
mop.lIer Whn III ,ala. ~ .nu onion rh1lnc Iliitohu
Company ana, enteitAhnR M th.se views, would haye
as readily stated my ownership In the former on all
ylcuon stated explicitly In the Senatorial canvass in
New Hampshire that had bought stock securities