New-York tribune., 1873-03-17
s27, ,2s0 80 f27,2sS 80
S3.6l,933 20
S366I ,y33 20
FRAUDULENT ArrrpAvIrs VERIFIED By YOUNG.

FRAUDULENT AFFrDAvrTs VERIFIED By YOUNG
The law required that all vouchers should be sworn TO
before Commissioner Of Deeds IL is In evidence that
these adavs often false and that many Of them
certified correctly sworn when. In fact, the
alleged affant did not exist. Among the vouchers
certified TO and paid under tho administration OF the
present Courthouse Commissioners, and on ne ln the
County Bureau. are the following:
Bill OF George s. Miller for carpenter work on
Courthouse, from May TO Nov. y, 1870, pald .-o 40
Bill Of George s. Miller for same service, from
Nov 10 TO Dec. 1870, paid Jan. IA, lS7l..;; 1876 %
shades. &C., paid Dec ~, 1870 .......... sslS1 IS
paid Dec 2s 1916 ....................... 3sl6s is
Bill OF A. ]. Garvey for mason work, paid Dec.
TO- oooot %
The adayits upon each Of these bills purpor that the
persons named appeared and verified the same before
Mr. Young, who is q Commissioner OF Deeds, and who
certihes the affidavit having been made before him.
The signatures TO the afdavs the bill Of George g.
Miller forgeries. A. j. Garyey has stated that ne
never swore to this particular bill that he placed bis
signature to the affidavit at the time the bill was pre-
pared; that no notary Commissioner Of Deeds had
certified when he signed it, and that he never ap-
peared before Young for the purpose Of making oath to
this bill. And j. Smith and A. G. Miller are
concerned, they are myths such persons have ever
existed or appeared personally before Mr.. Young
LINK BETWEEN THE RINGS.
the here stated had been collected and
Young who spite Of the Of his associates and
fight OF his brothernaw has retained his clerkshp OF
the Board of Supervisors The Board (Which the same
as the Aldermen that body taking the name OF Super
vsors when acting county mattersD has been re-
formed and is the body 10 which the new charter
delegates the appointing OF the whole city gov
ernmen Some idea may be had Of their policy In future
appointments by auson 10 their action Youngs case
1t was first Of all intimated to Young by friend and
feow-oical who had made the investigation, that the
reports conclusive against him, in order to give
him opportunity resign; but he did not take ad-
vantage it. On the contrary he seems to have fort-
fed himself against expulsion for when the attempt was
made to remove HIM it sgnay failed. The report was
TO have been transmitted to the Board OF Supervisors
but on the advice OF members 1t was not officially
presented and made public, but was shown TO one or
two members only. On the 18th OF January last at a
meeting of the Board, resolution offered as fol
! lows:
removed from the office OF Clerk OF this Board and that
the present Clerk OF the Common Council be and he Is
hereby appointed TO act Clerk 70 the Board OF super
visors without however, any allowance or eOmpensa-
ton OF kind whatever addition TO the salary which
has been hxed and which he is entitled to receive as
Clerk Of the Board OF Aldermen.
This resolution laid over, and no action whatever
has taken since. Mr.. Young remains in his posi-
ton an important link between the old Ring and the
new in the Board OF Supervisors.