, 1873-09-12
= tTHE<CoURTS.
Another Action Against Tho Riverside
: = Company.
Answer Filed in the Bostwiok-Hess
Land Suit.
New Suits by the Republic Insurance
Company.
Statement Of the Equitable for July and
!, August.

It's 2gent sold to Complainant Calvin w. G1lnn hvo OF
said bonds, and 70 Complainant Foster ". Mitchell, ten
Of sall bonds all Of which wcro guaranteed by Dun
comb by ha agrecmen. in writing indorscd upon each
bond that aince tho Rsuo Of these bonds all Of tho In"
toreat coupons have boon pad thoy mAturol, tho
only ono remaining unpaid bctng that duo OH tho 9Th
Nove.nbcr no1t, when the bond itself faals duo !:
TINT though in oac Of tho said honda It Ii stated That
It ia ono OF ser1cs secured by certain dcet Of
unon pToerty y vauod a a yat tho compsn
anita nro informed TINT tho trllstdeed waa never
corded and TINT and statement II fraudulent md fase
III that regard that us thoy learned this tloy
Instituted Inquiries With regard to the decd whom thoY
discovered that Church was dead and TINT tue trat-
SAID ssd cns % fse sega Sa he 81 hes b.
s!royed because it neveF bseamo operative; tint
wore described In tho trusdeed, give any nformn
tion whatever with regard to tho aano; TINT Chll1s
net. naa wsh Is hopssssy sS
and have conveyed al of its property md assets to
divera persons anl corporations to compainants
tlecl that II said decd destroyed by design, it
was Iii fraud Of complannnts' rglts tho officers Of
@ Sy M s at IL ona S
vons to whom 1arge quantity Of tho Riverside I'm
rsovomsnt oomrays lanas S5,n,Ss TSro conveyed, and
Of ss tho outatandag bonda hat on tho 1st ''f of
ia doca Of that nte, conveyed to sad Stevens iarge
amount Of real essntc for which he paid cunsora-
ton md ~ or t9e greater part Of which ws covered
equity subject to tho samo. Conplasnnnts alloge hnt
puncomb IL wholly insoivont and unable to rIy said
40 conveyed 70 Stevens ure not covered by sd trust
decd, tho ought 10 be held as SECURITY for tho ly
ment Of said bonds. according to to tenor and effect
vena, who resides i'll Now York. but is at present tn
Chicago, will soll said promises 70 unocent pur-
In confederation Of which alleged n,lHieols, COM
painanis ask tat the 1styorside 1mlroyenlent COM
lany Eucry L. Chi!ls, Leverott Il. Murray, DAVID g.
Dancomb aud Austin stevona may 10 n,ado 1.rties
defendant: tlat Stevens bo reatrainea from selling
tho propcrty conveyed to him md that They may
destruction Of tho truat deed, what purctiar proper
ty 1t covered tho existence of any other trust rcd
ssaay as Ss nsss 1t sss
nnts nlso ask for restoration Of tho trust decd tint
sesens hold the property conyeycd to him in trust
pointed, to whom Stevens shall conway tho laud 10
hols order 10 bring 1t within tho jursdctiou Of tho
court the first Monday Of octobor uext was granted
by Judge B1odgest.
Answer IN THE posrw1cg v. nEss LAND SUIT.
In tho aomowhat notorious caso OF tDe Bostw1ck
heirs against Hess md others, an answer WAS filed
yesterday BY Paul Cornell and his wife. The answer
tionu In regard to tho land III question: tle s. W of
&c., H. 81, H. aud alleges thAt o Ind sold all hts in
tsFs t. ~" he Mn o. s t. thn
Dostwick or his heirs over paid anything for said
lind.
made proposition to Of tho defendants, John NJ
Krum, 10 60 Into . land speculation, and krun coli
Kruu akna Tie S to a and drawn1 @
upon lin for the amount, t,-Dostwtck only acting as
agont md having no interest IN tho land. Bostwick
accordingly applied to Skinner to purchase tho land In
question, and arrangement waH nale to sell to him
for 1000 aoo0 Of which was to DO in cash, aud the
balance III yo years. That when tho 1000 was paid
Skinner would give deed, and take mortgage for
tho ren,aader. Bostwick immediately drew Oh krum
for Il oo ind the draft was rai1 under tho Rpprehou-
&Flrt nj
tltlo. Dosswlck however, paid the 81, ,oDu to Skinner
for himself, md Skinner made tho deed to Bost-
any time into the control Of tle defendant, raui
Cornell, but kert It until aome time after. when
1t !ea exhibit III foreclosure suit by him.
SAID deed aud mortgage which were nude out but not
delivered, wero never recorded. Nolthcr Bostwick
his er ever took posscseon, paid taxcs. even
ilre. Tho anawyr also denies that John 1lgham laia
tho account Of Downing, which WIS afterwnrd pro-
scented 10 tho County Court aud allowed. Mrs. Bost
wick, after her husbands doah fearful that Skinner
would present lurge claim against her husbands
tate which very email, and knowing Tint tho and
ased pwnua to u
out letters Of administration aud endcayor to have the
claim cance!ed In eono way. An application waH ac
resentatipns, rs ohaSged III ito Ill, and J. r. Downing
appointed administrator. IN his inventory tho I'D.
also tho mortgage to Skinner but tho defendant do
MICS that this hll any force effect evidence te
chow that Il was postwtcks but merely Indicated
DuWntLe ta.tul tssn Il. Ssca .s'tus ~ ~
Doatwiok. ,o.,
III March, iB5o, Downing appned TO t1e coantJ
Court for Leave 10 sell tue real estatt
pay debts' and afterwards permission was gyen te
sell inc lan with oher pieces Gs!ongnB 70 tue 90
ceaEel Acsordingy, ~ april, 1es0 DOWNING so!d VI
auction this 8. ": II TO rAu Cornell Tor FSo aud tht
salo confirmed ny the court, and acea given y
Downing rs adniulatsmt9r,, Of which Halo and pro-
cectlngH he widow anu heirs hah notice at ths time
cornell aelios tnat 10 @aea ununo t, aense 70 se
troA Hostwick NJ agreement lor tAo purchase 81 ole
half Of tne premises at to same price W le had pa!
but Adnth lhat noat"fc6 gave hlin &he option ICE
half on those terms,Twllch IA wns never z acconted @
as he, CornoL, tsl not think thete would
bo any profit p IL it. ,,,. AZ the . decd
wa nsver delyerea 10 boalwieK 'si: aarine sl
DEATH hS heirs have never bad my title 70 the land
III May, 1857, SKINNER nleu bla agai1is; uo~inue
aud the Boatwiok seira TO forecose and decrso Gu
tered tie ean,o Soar In August tue property G was M
aod anu purchased 1y u9rnen M Ms w tna tot Ky :
Skinner filed I'm ~ clanssry ana onta'nea decrot
IN lSos dseaTng tne ifaoSs aor an' ~ !e