Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1873-02-21
ORDER OF PUBLICATION.
JAMES W. BARNES AND MARGARET E.
BARNES, HIS WIFE,
oHAs. H. cooPARD AND OTHERS.
January Term, 1873,


TIME object of this suit is to obtain De-
cree for the partition of the real estate
OF which Charles Coorard, late Of Montgom-
cry county, died seized and possessed, among
the devisees of said deceased.
The Bill states that heretofore a certain
Charles Coopard, late of Montgomery county,
deceased was in his lifetime, seized and pos
sessed of ctrtanGeal estate, lying and being
in said county, and being so thereof seized
and possessed, sometime in the year eighteen
hundred and sixty one, departed this life
leaving last will and testament duly exeeu-
ted ia his lifetime, with all the formaites
necessary 20 pass real estate, to which his
name is signed as Charles Cooper, such be-
ing the name by which lie was generally
known in the community in which he resided,
which said last will and testament WAS Only
admitted to probate by the Orphans Court of
Montgomery county, and is now of record in
the Office Of the Register Of Wills of said
county, ana by which said last will and tes-
lament be devised said real estate to his wife
Mary, for and during the term Of her natural
life, or the continuance of her widowhood,
and upon her death or marriage he devised
the same 10 his children, Frances, Mary, Ann
Catharine, Martha, Charles Henry and Mar
garet, and their heirs respectively, TO be di-
vided in equal shares between them, and duly
nominated and appointed his said wife, Mary
Coopard, the Executrix of said will.
The Bid further states that the said willow,
Mary C0opard, departed this life sometime in
the year eighteen hundred and sixtythree;
that the said Frances Coopard intermarricd
with certain Charles Clarke, Of Montgom-
cry county, who has departed this life, leaT-
ing the said Frances SURVIVING him; that the
said Mary Coopnrd, daughter of the said Chas.
Coopard, is ntermar?icd with certain 10 s.
Hopkins, and resides with her husband in said
Montgomery county that the said Ann Cath
arine is intermarried with certain Oliver II.
p. Clarke, and resides with her husband in
said county; that the said Charles II. Coop
ard is intermarried with certain Isabella
Coopard and resides with his wife in said
county; that the said Martha A. Coopard in
termarred with certain William Baker, and
resides with her husband in Washington
city, in the District of Columbia; and that
the said Margaret is the complainant Alarga-
ret r., now ntermarried with the complain
ant James VIM. Barnes.
The Bill charges that the said real estate is
susceptible of partition among the parties en-
titled thereto, bnt they have not been able to
agree upon division hereof.
The Bill further states that the said William
Baker asd Martha A. Baker, his wife, do net
reside in the State of Maryland.
1t is thereupon, this twelfth day Of Febru-
airy, in the year eighteen hundred andseventy-
three, adjudged and ordered that the com
plainants By causing cory Of this order TO-
gether with the object and substance OF the
bill to be inserted in some newspaper pub
lisheG at Rockville, in said Montgomery coun-
ty, once week for ft'ar successive weeks be-
fore the eighth day of March next. give notice
to the said william Baker aud Martha A. Ba-
ker, his wife, and warn them toappeariu ibis
Court in person or by solicitor, on or before
the ninth day of June next, to answer the