New-York tribune., 1873-12-15
NEw-YoRK DAILY TRIBUNE, MONDAY,

byzan orders The Ycense stating that he was Scotch
stylpg hm Scotch Pres6y though twice serious
ly called to account for this by Dr. Drumm Bu. this Ia
a faiI specmen OF his objections ...
tmrdcriticism OF DR.. Drumm is this: Grindll was
under sequestration Archbishop and hs license is
therefore OF little value and moreover, he slack in
dscipulc. and not the Plrtans" really
disqual hcd for faithful and energetic discharge Of
duty" will not here undertake the defense Of one
of the Eoblest bravest, purest of English preiaes-
man whom Bacon styled "the greatest and gravest
preate G. the land :" and Rogers another eminent
temporsy. "a Jealous eOntessor and tried soldier. a
right famous and worthy prclae, whose great
10 further the glory of GOd and OF whom Sirype de-
cares his episcopal abilities a1d admirable endow-
ments Tor spiritual goyernmrnt AS well as MT snguiaf
learning, tTerc much celebrated"
This friend OF Ridley and Bradford disIeased the I'M
perous. arbitrary AID worldly Elizabeth by refusing
to forbid the clergy their spiritual and men
tai impr0y ement She did not want learned 'lIIu
numerous clergy. She objected 10 "the great nuioer
OF preachers then IN the Church, whereas she cor
sdered that two or three would quite enough for
county She peremptorly demanded that inc @ ntIeIv
suppressed" Grindal wrote 10 Elizabeth long et'et
in repJsto those demands. than which hooe' HStcr
lCent has peuned NY the hand OF man h'S n
giving ns reasons Tor refusing 10 ooeS her "'s''
oouseos and qTenss Of the msey OF God H ,
sny purctoo for ne utter spG al svefon Of The s9m
with ST Paul have no power 10 a'O! % ou ~, t for DE
truth sttl l'' same ''''D'' go ~ '''N ,o,,
be your Maj.s;ys pleasure m This oh cause =" i
tins plsce Will with al bu1'? Jiel @ oe, der
9th ,,ef ,s.t IL isaral thing hDd of the .ns
God consider also that he who Ae' agsins hs S W.
eHej bsOPre, bop de whole World a'' ~ ~
Thank God this sort bishops is not entirely extinct
even these degenerate days. For s reIiaSi Hitnai %
was nut nnder sequearatOn by Elizabeth ana tie Dnsl
meas of the diocese transacted by Two cvlans 1 @
the day % his death six years alterVard III loSS rms
state OF affairs gives more Iorce 10 my w, 80
rived from the license of Morrison Tor tbe eVnals Ntl
nominated ny the Queen, as Grnda wouid NOT % seen
further to dspease the Queen and oers or hcr seec
ton would according 20 her pleasure III Is hia roei
that this license Of PresDl terlah munster 10 piSHc
and administer the sacrameDts ~ he tnItcno EEiau
had the and approval OF boh the eiViI anu &C.
clesiastical authorities
Thus my point is fully proved. ana ipasnuch as one
instance Satisfactorily determined settles the case tbce
is no need CT further argument. must reSaru ara tle
authorities h6ve presented as correct ana Di D'uni
is therefore mistaken, and Bishop Cumnlnss statement
is fully indicated as correct anu trntanl o, untitled
On this OF Morrison. Hopkins ~ m'- w9'k enton
"The Puritans and Queen EhZabctb, Vol L. page H.
Wbh.r III. license, were u bgh oS
eccuen. snecieb parpose decisive as n socsar
cbs,~b tSt ie. an i5s2-h general sentiment Of tba, crcn
ppyed and ratified other fountains Of pdes urtae than It's osn
,HS And .o..GTle's' O''s' 'A-' '"e N'D''
ne n, Morrison being thus conclusivey settled.
Whttingham and Travers must be regarded as having
been entitled to hold their positions iaWihy as ldr ~
their Presbyterian orders concerned. Both nrId
their places for wears by virtue these ORDERS which
were recognized by the Statute OF EGTabethi "hIttF
ham Dean Of Durham, and 4IaNets Is preacher III '"'
We have convincing evidence that the question viz,
respect 70 Nottingham WAS whether ne hhd icceise'
orders in auy church whatsoever Archbishop Sdhdis'
his prosecutor, recognized inc Cnuich o. ntie va Az"
ministry Travers may have omitted t. nave maze 'he
required subscription. hut he ufged m ms Oeali ths
th1se who bad none but Presby Oidcgs bad enjoyed
prefernents in England. THIS lie won1 9t nave uohe
il the facts were not easily 10 bo Established ,
Dr. Blrch's statement with respect 20 Df. Deihnhe
must be inferred correct uni ne Is shown % 'e 10
error Cevallerius could lawfully have neen pc1ch
ing prebendary. and be received as ininster ehNo
| Alter-IIistorcus" 10 vndicate his own accuracy
The instances Francis and Cailendrnl are nor 10 De
regarded Is worthless and untruS"WthN, ut''7C I'D
1aI VINO rreseuted them became u dest late IN life.
have seen dests whom would trust iar s0oncf tlan
some professei Christians Was not JOnh stuart MIL
more worthy Cf confidence man solue WI, NV
might he namedl Inda said "he wrote ms DOOb I'D OreF
10 make the clergy mad. There was enough Ia the MS
tory the Church of England, 1Ion ~ bartLo,oie
dav t the trial OF Dr. Sachereye TndlFs era 10 snake
the faith Of in Christianity we're there POT aoLd
ant proofs OF its divine origin I1eft - seFuthce o q
served under such ecclesiastical adnlnsratl0nS tefc
is no greater obstacle in the way OF ile eIoseI t
hierorcbv holding the views OF Laud S0edoD. and tber
followers An EpscOYacy claiming exclusive DlVino
right inevitably tends TO evil The mother country ana
onr own land have taught ma lesson Ill tnls matter
which may the people universally heed!
But do not wish to weary y0ur readers sulucc 10
say that II Dr. Drumm with st. Paul and Grndal Is
for the truth ana not against tIe nun, nc MI,t no
publish his articles without their antd0te; III these
writings he has assaed "ell-estaDlisneu' Wei-ten
Gated historic truth ne mas enough lSnsDiA1n IN o,
this from his publication or N0A EccIesl1 INA.
book ia q complete misnOmer IL Is no; " inc voice u
the church." Tut of au active parry IN H. paL'V 'Ie I
! have been the authors OF lncalchItple tNls III
led him 10 an oppose conclusion. Not OF the Re-
formers under Edward Elizabeth can De shown 10
Not one OF those men held with the controlling
spirits land who osreprosen the cburch OF White
and Cranmer Ii again challenge Dr' Dfiinh' OF any
other man. 10 prove that here maze false assertion
may discuss this subject yet more fuily In your col
unns and before close shall remove the secrecy win re-
spect my identity, which the circumstances OF t1is
controversy have compelled me unN!lng5 10 assume
On the score Of fairness request nc BUCKS County ca
zee TO insert the present aruce III It's Columns mat ls
readers may hear somewhat OF the other SIDE III TINS con
troyery as Dr. Drnmm mus oPG % iS na S more m tn g
10 append this article 20 The Volume Tor the sanr reason
Audi olteram parteia. HIsToRIcUs.
NeW- lOr6 Dec. {, 1873.