, 1873-07-10
THE COURTS,
ueclsion Of tho Fourteenth strcet Snit
---Tho improvements to Do
Carried Ont.
Linda Gilbert v. Evening Post
Printing Company.
Singular Action for Freight---Anothey
Suit Against tho City.

oa't Against tho City.
eo"ney Court ltoms---Tho Courts
Contlonsed---New Suits.
Ahe sult OF L1ll OF al. Y. tho City, in which
eompia'oant sought m Injunction to restrain t,,c
o.ty from improving Fourteenth stroot with curb
esones, SIX foot north Of tho sroot Is It 1,aa a1
Ways Doon accepted, cano up for decision by
1"uso williams, yesterday afternoon, Tho
ooa1' 8a'a that, IN his opinion, tho caso only in
soNso 'ae question aa to the trlo 1oostion OF
.. ro"t.eon.h street, formerly called Liberty
etroet that tho evidence ehowe1 lint M,vnr
La1ln. in 1s4s, wishing to subdvfdo tract Of
'ana ahout lvo acros in cxtont, the north 1Ino Of
1nlch was II chains, Is links south Of tho doy-
elnnoh1 % monument, situated on the corner Of
otato and Twelfth atreotB, and tho cor
nef OF Sections IL and 10, employed one
>o'auoy to mako the nocessary sur.
,ty voy. q, Bradley divided tho property into
t;hart sere Of loss with 4ofoot strcot, named
s.lgoi5y' n1ng the depth and width of the lots
and the width Of tho street, aud stuck ntakos
ana liked stones at the cornor Of State and liz,
ul.y sIfoets and at the corner Of Clark and Lib
thosa et1eete ato, ahc weight Of evidence that
tne iIne OF tho street as it was occupied for ovor
y emeuly years; that the question there presented
Rroot Mqe whether or not tho map which located tho
and stroot corner stones wore placed waa Ia
govorn, or wlether the stakes and stones wore
10 se govern. Tho Court thought that It was not q
ha " hero wss uoelSoo no 'Ha by
bg tho map running 90 many Chains ~
5o,aa So many feot to tho monument. Tho map un-
on!1 aonp!ea!y "a showed tho street to be six feot
% tulta o1 1ne pacoB whore the stones wore ID
catea and in his opinion, unor tho statute the
e,Iy could only demand title to lands dosicnatad
oy Tue plat as tho street that 1t took its titlo
vavor. .ap thp ah ana not from the acts Of sur
froJuti ,Hat II surveyor makes q mistake and |
locates lot and street lines different from WIT
tney arc marked in the plat, tho city would taxa |
hhc1dhg honng & TO tue plat and proportyholdors we're
pub1o Streets arc concerned The Colrt thero.
1oro decreed that tho Btroot wan where thn ctv
ca.meq 1t 70 be and that the act Of tho Surveyor
s S feat enpfsc Mofks in dividing
" the supreme Court on that point, and to do
, 1norwIso would bo to do injustice to tho parties
n.eieatea .. e; H. Ihe Court found that thero was no
equity IN tha bill which be dismissed,
LINDA GILBERT V. EVENING posr.
1nla case Is still progressing and as It nd
t,@ vaneos, 81 1t bocomos more interesting, Judging
eeednrs @ eages sudence Who Watched Ae
Mr. If1pp was again examined, and testified thaf
no one ongaBod III the enterprise consderad Il |
70 TO- Do ea.o lottery He and Miss Gilbert enginoored
what they could furnish tho prizcs for, They
expected to pay for tie iowelry from tha Iss nros
So,th eesth fd Pa tie ho sue Of tho picture which el
bene ra,sdp ~ a the money it sod
stated that as soon they woro CHARGED WIFI, |
con Conducting TN lottery, and tho Indictment
teos i ss bary they eeassa fro song
not consider tho enterprise she was onrared in
70 e, be lottery. Thought that they wore eiyinn
he the the worth Of their money ID
tle n a,tefnoon the examination Of Miss B1chan-
AQ one OF the eIitnYg n fha Z
tae sensation. Miss 3. detailed her o1periopces :
at w. H. H. usofvie"er, expressed the holest horror
araae ae aho ovs "io eanaed u; BY lottery scLoos and
showed, under cross-examination. Finding tbat
no esa could l. mako nothing out OF her, judge Van
hsya at et tn aeE Poe OF ,t With compliment
gallant I'D 1e judsc G hs1 Abo Ss mao esaed tns
answered the imperious editor. !" snid Tia d
nnogo onog B., ~ l. thought the Post had fallcn on
go1a aea e Of ato with the exception of an
between Judge VauB and tho placid Swott. a,
there was nothing further worthy Of noto in tho i
days transactions. - 'N1S 81
11a CRY TAX SALE SUIT, o
George G. Morrick files bill in tho Cjrcu,t O.
GonIt against Henry Waller, Emily J. aud James II II
montgomery, William Kolsoy Reed, John For !.
syln tho cat City Of Chicago, md Joaoph Pollock
res said poack and lis successors successors in Il
eGe .a, from Issuing my deed or deeds Of oxcop
teS sn,3 81 Lots , 5 to- 90 OF Blocks 1 and o
Il ~ 1.a.A .an smp-alvie1on Of N. 2. Of N. -
GonGTat oa city taxes Of 1870 to William Kelsey Sc
neeu ,"sa. Ior S4io'Go, and on o sale for special
me- Of th9 year 1870 held 22d Of
speca! assessment. Warrant ITO for curbiug
'aving nn and filing woat Adams street from Ashh.
to moboy %; s:se 9d sa
Q Jehn Forsyth tor s412s and another tD snc6 s
ala to William Kelsey Reod for $27.36. TLe ~, ~,
property u very valuable, having been purchased pi
AISoULAn ACTION FOR FREIGHT | VIC
+: n. Nalshe, ownor Of tile schooner 8. Bates. on
,,eslna suit in admiralty, in the United Stated wi
lIeus ah: Court, against John Mason Looma aud Pr
IGn mcLa1en 70 recover certain fgegs. Com ba
a'hants allego that tho schooner Was chartered mi
Y ae1enaants to leave the port of Michigan an
;ity Ind, whore sho was lying, to proceedto The nr
oft e 81 jManaisoe Mich and there take full cur
eng loaded by the stronach Lumber Company. cit
ihen tho achoonor Monomonoe came along and rll
rocoodod to tako in cargo. The consooaonco pri
,%a4 as 'at e + Bates did not get full tht
oo0 feet Of lumber, and had to start for Chi mi
ago with only 81 III feot, for which alono The ha
,spondonts represent themselves as willing to at
~. Complainant brings the suit on the ground Gin
lat tho charter was to convey a full CARGO. and
is roapondents' fault if ho was unable to do 30.
SUIT AoA1a6r THE CITY.
a progessng IN this aoon MY ol Gaeag9
'eks to recover $40 600 for dnmageB doo to lis 10y 10y
,iiaI 1ayy ~ ~; ss maio o'!b1uet VINO, N 1b6i, inv
.-a,; "tt ato "at!e W o1aer 10 Under tho full
.9aosub ~ AAe HAtt!t Wh6 cau6ou NY boiler yer
Iioh!oA on Canal btreet, Ii tho vicinity of com- upo
a1nant property. After the fre in 1aGD Aha aal
mplainant laid his case before the Common
ouncil, who recommended that no be paid
,2oo to make up for his loss. but Mayor Mason O.
soeu t J.. Luz ae appropriation Complainant now ton
eka $8, 800 more than ho was thon willing to Co.
cept. ~ tnke
COUNTY COURT ITEMS, the
1ho will OF Robert Hchnitzlor was proVon and shar
,1ots iestanentary wore granted to Frances H. ns