Shenandoah herald. [volume] (Woodstock, Va.) 1865-1974, 1873-10-02

=, COLUMBIA FrKNAcr, Aug. 9th, 1873
Messrs. Prescott. stoneburner 4 Co.,
| Gentlemen,
.. purchased last fall
| OF YOU one and aShalf tons of Your Shenando
Ammoniated SaRerrhcsrkate, also one ton of
the Maryland Fertilizer, used the same guam
tlty OF each per acre. side by side, two u ndred
pounds, where I ased your fertilizer the heads
and straw were longer and the whoa better in
quality. ! expect to sow fert zers this fall an
shall use yours, for It is equal in any respect
to the Mary Ian, Fertilizer, and it is considera-
by chtaper. VIM. KINGREE.
REcroRTowN, Fauquier Co, Va.
July l6, 1873.
Messrs. Prescott, s oneblrner & Co:
used IL tolls of your fertilizer las,
Fall OH my wheat. / used about 40 lbs.
per acre ON very poor land. that would no;
nave brought the seed that was sown ON ii
without Fertilizer. but with the use of il.
raised as good wheat as was in the neigh
borhood, and have an excellent stand O,
clover and timothy on the land. | also
used two other fertilizers. one of which
acted very finely, and the other without
'ny evidence that it did any good. also
used It BESIDE the Patapsco. that one of NV
ne z hbor's used, and my wheat was equal
to his, or be ter, think the heads of my
wheat was the largest, and upon the VIII lie
1t acts ABBOTT ms well as the best of fertili-
GERS and t is some $50 cheaper per ton
than the ,h'a. .e>l. an.! acts very finely.
=. Ii. HALEY, Vi. ID.
fully concur i'll the above statement.
| raised Il fine crop of wheat from, the Use
OF your fertilizer. ami have IL fine slard of
grass. JEU. II. STEW ART.
used onc-half.ton Of your fertilizer ON
my wheat last fall and am .n:ich pleased
with the result. and also u SooI stand of
grass from The use of it.
~ WIN. MURRY.
+ used one ton of your fertilizer on nv
wheat last fall, By. the side of the Patapsco
and Turner's The result l am much
pleased with. Can see no difference be-
tween thens yonrs being equally as good
as theirs Ia,nssonfident without the use
OF fertilizer Nollld have made littls or no
wheat, and my grass did WELL -
--..---- So i. TEMPLEMAN.
Messrs. Prescott, Stoneb1,rner s. Co.
We have used yialr phosphate, and it has
given entire satisfaction IL, ~ . -
JOS. E. GOCHENoUR,
July Z, 1873. d. II. GOCHENOUR.
II hereby certify that used half ton of
the Shenandoah Anmoniated Superphos-
phate, lastifall, ilbm1 0ne-half of a five acre
lot, near Woodstock. Upon the other
half OF the same lot, and rather the better
part OF 1t in quality OF soil, used another
phosphate of high character, in equal
quantity. TheaHsult has been very salts
factory, indicating the decided superiority
OF the former over the latter. The stand
ofwheat was much better upon. the part
Of the lot upon which the former was used
Although the drilling was not good, be-
lieve I'shall make Is bushels to the ere
upon that half ofthe lot 1t might have
easily been increased to 20 by proper driI-
ling. MOSES WALTON.
Woodstock. Va, July :, 1873.
used Il ton of the Shenandoah Phos-
phate last fall.'' The wheat where | used
1t turned out very WE'LL The heads were
large and well filled. i tested it by drill
ing on land Of like quality beside another
standard fertilizer, which cost upwards Of
300 per ton. and am satisfied the Edin-
burg made better wheat. Twill Use it ex-
clusively the coming fall on my wheat.
=, H. g. ALLEN.
Woodstock, Va. July 2. 1873.
hereby certify that L used the Shenan
doah Phosphate last fall on a portion of
my crop of wheat My crop OF wheat ri
consider very good, and the stand of clo-
yer is very fine. Where used no fertili-
ger ay wheat was very Indifferent.
f.. B. WHiSSEN.
Edinburg, Va. July s, 1873.
PRESCOTT, STONEBURNER g. CO
EDINBURG, VA.