The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-08-29

Mr.. CROwLgY-I saw by the HERALD and other
papers that some oil them have.
commemorative did they recognize the
Mr.. CsowLEY-l believe that they didn't think
he was Sir Roger at all.
CoRREsroNDENr-And you are certain that you
could identity the claimant II he is SIR Rogerf
Mr.. CROWLEY VERY iorclbly)-n he IL Sir
Roger ! can identity him in two minutes, and ne
CoRREsPoNDENT-Hav you ever written to the
old country about the matter OF your ability to
Mr.. CRowLEy-Never; my old neighbors know
that know all about SIR Roger, but have not
corresponded with either side and don't know
whether they know am here.
CoRREspoNDENT-Did you hear anything from
Mr.. Whalley when he was here9
Mr. CR0wLEY-Not line. wrote, as told you,
to friend TO inquire about Mr.. Whalley and
wanted to invite him out here and show him the
country and in order that we might talk over the
matter. i would like, too, to say, through Ghe
HERALD, as notice that some OF the papers are
limiting that ! want to go home only and
said wanted to go home to give testimony though
! think my testimony would be very important SO
far as identlncaton Is concerned. do not care TO
CoRREsPONDENr-Welr, what do you think OF the
claimants chances Mr.. Crowley lie has made q
long fight. DO you think he is Sir ROger2
Mr.. CRowLEY-I don't know; never saw the
man and perhaps he don't care to see me. He's
made plucky Tight at all events.
CORRESPoNDENT--But don't you think that If he
was really Sir Roger he would be DESTROYS to have
you and others whom you say knew sir Roger when
Mr.. CR0wLEY-l think 80, and our testimony
would settle the matter OF identity.
CORRESPONDENT In failing to call upon YOU
and others who In his early lie knew Sir Roger
don't You think the Claimant gives evidence that
Mr.. CROWLEY don't know. without seeing
Str Roger.
CoRREsPoNDENr@ls there anything else of inter-
est you can think Off
Mr.. CRowLEY-No, sir; have told about all.
CoRREsPOkDENT-One more question. II you
rfUn A
any Information as to the private life OF Sir Roger;
as TO MS morality say, which appears TO be point
Mr.. CRowLEY-Sir Roger was a gentleman, sir,
In every way.
CoRREsPoSDENr-Not one who would be likely to
tarn1sn MS name by any excess or miscOnductr
Mr.. CRowLEY-No, sir, he was a gentleman,
always found, and, knowing him so WE'LL would
have known II he was otherwise.
Thus ended our interview, and bidding Mr..
Crowley good night your correspondent left.
It appears evident though ne WIN not admit It
directly, that Mr.. Crowley does not take much
stock in the claims OF the claimant. He appears
well informed as to Sir Rogers career while IN
case in its several stages throughout its course
thus far. 10 but few has he recorded any knowl-
assert that they have been advised OF 1t for two
three years.
DIR. kencaly's Life's Work-Close OF the
Longest Speech on Record.
LONDON correspondence Dundee Advertiser,
August 1871
145 FLEET STREET, London, Friday Evening.
DR.. Kenealy closed his address this afternoon In
the rchborne case without giving the slightest
indication that he was drawing his terrible Grafton
to termination. His junior, however, assures us
that somehow or other" there will be an end of
the speech on Monday, and tnen the witnesses who
are to prove the defendant Is not Arthur orion
VIII be called. Pending the arrival OF the interest
ing Wappingites, 1t Is painful to observe that the
defendant himself is not acting up 10 the character
for gentlemanly behavior which his counsel has
been giving him. To-day an unlucky artist was IN
the Court making sketch. The judges had lett the
bench for lunch, and the jury had left the Court
presumably for the same purpose, SO the coast
was clear and the defendant assailed the young
artist, remarking, as he passed near him, 'Why,
man, could beat that myself Are you the artist
OF the Police Nelcs2" Returning TO the Court the
defendant again attacked the artist, who was max
ing few simple sketches OF character" and in a
manner and tone of no very elevating description
endeavored to attract the attention OF crowded
assembly to the poor artist. IL was very con-
temptible exhibition, but 1t was chlld's play itself
TO the frequency OF the quarres, conducted in
audible tones, between the defendant and DR..
Kenealy. since DR.. Kenealy announced that his
speech is not to 60 forever, the affection OF the
defendant for his eloquent advocate appears to
have declined rapidly, and to-day he appeared
quite erOcious because DR.. Keneay said II was the
fancy Of q mailman 10 suppose-as the defendant
had supposed-that the family solicitor had offered
IL, 600 to some one to do away with HIM.