New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-05-30
ferdan's restraining them from tobacco !uspec e:
Ing 20 the prejudice Of petitioners

!
| h!s own 1ecCgE;zaEce of $50
State We. John Lemast.r-False imprisonment
! verdict. guilty.
STATE - ). r. Allen. Phi.ip RIA. ard John
Hloy Mole p,"seqI: entered IL each ease.
State IS. George S:eiLtE-Assaglt and battery
Noe piesecui entered.
State S. EphIaim Sanders Larceny. VERDICT
STATE ". Thomas Overwhelmingly. Pea 0,
aot guilty.
| ,SVokMAr,0Ss y1Lvp
| L,or-nce Brown, EeIvey EudeIs. A'eck Harrison
| and May Augustine, for ASA II and battery.
George EaIrs, Jack Ws!ker and Radt!ey Gordon,
| !arcen-.
George Thompson, breaking sren 1nd entering a
| dwelling house.
Louis Voter. knowingly RECEIVING s:c:en prop
euy.
! The 'uccessions of Theobad Warth Lara L.
| gerGIe deceased VIE ii E. W. Huntington. Jean
Michel Joor., Gerolni1a SsviI wife OF v.1c.I SO
| GStG. have been opened n this CONT.
Third District Court.
State * rel. NJ. Tooney VI. John Cain, .orIt',
,n-t!ceu :he 'eacs.-App!'eai.on for : VIII OF
The iela'or. a :esidsns Of :hisc'ty. :.'ege. that
On :he twenty hiIh O. Apr H,l !" Indsae;t ha g
~ favor OF one J. Eerses by lie Honorable fourth
instce Of the PEACE :r the parish OF Orleans: that
iudgmen: to this honorable court, he protfeIed 20
file Oh the thiTteth OF the came month petition
| OF appeal. with bond condlt oned as the law Re.
Iurts i, but the honorable fourr, justice OF the
p-ace refused 10 allow the same to be filed and d..
| Led IN. rigb: o: q suspeIsve appeal u the .ea
tor on he ground ,Ea: ihe delay thereof and " II.
IN which. SD re.ator coald fake asuspensve APP
zeal had expired Reiator further aveIs tbs; J.
Eerces took wit of fSIi fac as ia eCu:iOn 0i
| .he Judgment above mentioned; that the constable
of :he Fourth Justice Court IS now about to pro.
ceed 10 eelze his property 10 satisfy sad judgment.
and tia! he has been improperly denied the rishl
| OF a suspensive appeal. having applied :oT the
same WITHIN the delay pIescr bed by Jaw.
He. Therefore. prays :or an order directing So ID
justice OF che peace, said constable. ard VeIges
20 show cause why writ of mandamus and PRO
| ht!:on should lot issue. PROHIBITING them from
| farther proceedings and ordering the said justice
o: the peace 20 grant the suspe1 sve appea PRAYED
for bT Tie Ie;aior On by him complying with the
The Judgment IN favor Of }. Verge. being ren
deIed on the twenty FIFTH Of Apr. 1873, il pres
cree Of the parties and the application for Sac.
| Pens.ve appea! Thereof having been ace the
;hiIti.th ct tie same month: TIE Only gees: on 20
.atol IL .de is app! eaton for d sutpens!ve appeal
| w:'hiG tie 'egaI d. ay :"
The reiatoI relies articles ,is :75 and l'2a O.
:!- Coce Of Practice: asO on sections .G.l and 1888
Ev a1ticle 1888 IT ,Le Code OF Practice i is
aas been rendered BY. a Justice Of the
pence ;ers II The parish Of o'esn. r., was
OF re ckoEiIg from Il not fcation OF j: If i:
| render. q in :he absence or On default Of
:ieu. :he Justice Of the peace .ilal' i suspen.
e.ve appeal has been taken from sa!d judgment.
:ssIe az order 10 se.ze the property Of the j1dS.
| Sections 1851 and 2oss Of .he Revised sta.utee g:
1870 declare :ha: the appeal from j.dgmen: ren.
d-red ny d justice OF the peace slal! no. suspend
|
judicial days: AID 10 execution Shall issue upon
any Judgment by justice Of :he peace al the par.
.sh o; Orleans :inti hIte :idica days after notice
| Of tie Judgment shall have been served upon :te
| party aga is: WHOM the Judgment shall have ben
rendered
According 20 article 1853 .fthe Cod. Of Practice
AID sections 28l AIT! zGSG OF tie Revised Statutes
above referred &c. j: 10 evident That snsrtnsive
| appea! from Judgment; rendered by Justice of
| III. peace n the parish Of Orleans NAV he taken
within ;h:ee .ldicia. days from The Notification Of
Article So G. provides as follows: .1t sihe az.
pea from Judgment rendered by district coSI;b
has been taken within tee days, 10: including sun
days after he iUdg neEr has Deen no. fed 10 tie
party cas- n Tie suit. when such not.ce is required
by l;.w :. sha! stay execution and 81 further pro.
:sed.nss 9!;l! dehA-;-ve Judgment De 1endeies on
The judgment againe: .he reiator III ,hi. case
having .ee: rendered and notified on ,he twenty.
h.h OF Apil!- 1873. and the application for Gas.
pens.ve appeal hav:cg leen made or the tlr'leth
OF the same month the r:!esticn now recu7s: Has
che isa;oT presented lis application within the
Cares that the appeal hal not suspend :he
tioH o: a Judgment rendered by a Justice o. the
peace, if :aksn after :hree iIdIria GAYS from 'he
no'ihe"' on OF tad Judgment, does il mean TIA.
he app eaton and the aprlA "Id mus: be tied
o. OF during the third dav. AT ..iest. ct tEe
Notification OF said Judgment. In counting
tie three l36I"la' DAYS. T.ckonin: from II.
that g IKE day when TIC delay expires. :" be
i.cl!ted' kit.c'e 1913, c. p. DEGREES that
I'll cases Wien delay is zen ether 20 30 sone:
fn.iSor TO a:sWeE Eeithei the day OF ee-vng ..le
no'ic. 40; that OF which the act i 20 be done az
a. JlS
# ne God. Of Practice is ceaI IN ts tex. and tree
tIon any ambiguity 20 is legal Interpretation:
therefore, .co:dinz 10 :is Nesc: pt'ons neti CT
tie day OF the Notification &: the 1!cmei. :" The
Telaio1 10: the day given him 10 &c d ap, ga
ton toT slspenslve appeal. aye to he .EcL!.d
il the thee judicial DAYS soue 60 by law 70 PEI
Ii. Ii. ease d: bar. the iaigm., u: Ia. been ,er-
de.ed scs is; and notified 70 lie reator Oh tie
twenty eth day o: April, 49,: bat e Sunday-a
DIES r"D j.I!G cus-havIng IuterveLed bt tween tie
-weit: 9Th ard tiiiteth o. Ap1l!. tiat $ u1av
.V1s 7.sA. .lalu u
:or srkpens!ye aFpea! expired tU. az! tie Ihr.
,eth G: Api!: IL .he case 81 MIS-. E. Leblanc vs..
C.ssa-d. t,eG afew days ago before re FL b ts-
tl1c' Court FOR tie a.:sh OF Orleans. The earntd
judge il. his i:eIyrea.io Of articles $50 AID .lG
day Of the service Of the Grafton Lsr Ihe one given
:" the e. Ldsu. 10 Sc LIS aIswe.. 10 be II
ended in The ten dave a ow.d Inn hv law, ard
la. 20 Judgment " te:au.: can ne 'akeD b; fore
eeveE { ca. days have elapsed AFTER The service OF
the citation in the s:'it OF Garland c. Ho,mes
wher. L -he very same question IS The at Issue
il 4: cas-" was presented. Tie S2pIeIe EoI;:
interpreting The article 3!6 OF Tie Code O.: Piac.
:ice sed tie following forc.b.e al guage: "a si.s
pei sive appeal maT he taken from !Icgneat
IeId",eG by sire. ur.l within rer Gays t!0m
the day OF which the Judgment was signed '9rIo
lost ard, il computing :he time, neIiie. Tire day
On winch tie judsmen: was signed (ot notified;
no, that on Which tie appeal IS TO ne 'akeH are
Ulder the author y OF the avs above referred |
Revised Statutes o; "1 and according TO TIE Coo
time recognized il the two decisions above loted
am O! opinion tha: the ;eiaoI. il .lpv.ng 20 the
Honorable n'rh.jastee OF the peace COX sEspen
s;ve apieal or the :hlteth OF April last 81!
within n. legal delay. s.G was therefore entitled
to the remedy the sought foy bv !.
For Ii. Sc reasons, le: writ O; Mandantus 6. ne
:e:eii. as prayed :oG II :ht relate: s:pe:i:.oE.
Fourth District Court.
MIS-. : 4. Gayarre. wife OF Charles Gava',e. Va.
;.:!fcn and otftrs.-Tte plaintiff ob.a.:led Il |
.G. !:dsme:I: anst former sheriff .: lie par
i.h o! Orleans for the sum o: 49, - and issItt |
.Zec.. OF. which was retained M, = boI.a Some |
time at.eTwari size brought SUI, aga INST 'ile de
te.daits IL TINS san as slsetes 81 he sHe!it. on
t.s Off" a! "ond, and III. defendants sc. Up tie !
prescription o! two Years "a nar Of Aer az: on; TIE
!iea was sustained AID The c.ieuGanrs iaa jEcs- |
El-lt il tho il :aver.
TIE present. SUIT was Instituted - arnn' -Ia: |
Judgment aud to rec veT from ,~i-iaaats 2" "a,
way ous I'ems Q: costs amounting 20 10 a, which.
with Tie amount g: the .udsned' s'!gn' % be ar
Of this az ION the LeteLdarts excepted OF Two |
grounds: FIRST; that the psin'if cay! no: cunu |
demand o: The oIisina! petition: and, secondly. |
that plaintiff las not Shown .ga cause OF acton.
..ctiLg judy. Nirhaumer. WHO .,:ed .he |
case SAYS. lam 0, opr ION tina. .ei~nsau1s :is: |
exception mus. be sustained. i ;,a.Lt:fTs IL. |
maa s.s' .. ' cs: .f L % JIrsne, e. So
with the above opinion is tie following :4d-,nsn:
q the act - :dse rendered OF :he si1;eenti OF
and iscIee that the defendants fret p. he
sCsra Lea. an :e paintiti den ard be- O, that
ncE-sl,' a Month later Tie same acting Judge
rendered tie follow IL ::t,gLei.: Oh tie merits:
- IS o;derei abridged AID decree. lat tie jads-
men: IIe!ed Il tie case No. -, o: he 10 ke;
this she eighteenth aIt. >isre.i Deem
beg %. 1865. BE anaIe,! aid set aside WI! costs
oi tbs s:it. aud tla: he No. - .c :,;eG
ag al. uron lie srgna. UleaI.nGs. End the pea OF
pIesc; !ir.:oI there Il o.. IL.
AZ apIcaI vas AIKEN. ard :!e supreme CoEI. o..
Ger-a Il at tht i"dgmeLt OF ne ..lstIct cG!: he
.-.. avoided and ,s-C ID .t-dt tie
be 5eua.,ed 20 tie cOur. OF the hrst .Is-a.e" 70 |
proceeded with according 10 Jaw. Prom -.
it' gnen: q: :he Supreme Court tleT.. mus: re-
gard he demand O: the nan; !! toI he i Nv &: