The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-02-11

ana which could not In the nature Of things form the
result Of The election On the 18Th Of November after
sssss ssf sssn az
s SspSy
S Of ~ te TS ss ns board
Comply With Tn h asnSS warm declined
r, wARnoTH's LETTER LoNosrREEr
s,nmIn reply to letter Just received Informing
s II % AZ a
ss sssEs .s sss ssf IF sSS
he s o hs o o
sSs ssye nsRy Sc
ence Of any such body that presided BY MI
ssss & "a HIss
al S q
Very FSqRFa Of Louisiana
General john LoNGsraEEr Deputy united states Su-
it's Claimed on behalf of this Board that BY the DC.
Ss o.
Sss S
T @ s sa S o1 the ssSr N se
g ss
prove actual character and the returns;
Which, Returning them
TO CONTRADICT THE FACE or TIE RETURNS, TO snow
IN e TIE T1Tn e Hdf
much ne evidence what Official returns
their IN AMONG
evidences the Lynch Board counted some Aye thousand
the s Lesare These
had sn ~ Right
whose votes had been at the polls In MANY
because Of color previous condition Of servitqde
aa % nc nc @
PROVISIONS Of the act Of Congress Of 1870 to enforce
Ri S sf WIN n
ydsd that where person has olsred 70 q to
% sfs e Tx Sep Sa e S
% and ss s sasS
IsTs Bu re : IN s
his
S s'' s sssS "Ss sSsn:ss
bring suit he Court: q he United
fn Tx ssse Ss that IT,
F s fer
Court 70 which the person who II Is claimed has been
sssi proof hst sSs pisini has deprived q lis
By The exS8sGn Of voting On &C.
be ea oc
tho aps s3.9g9a r in the parishes
h 70 Of % on sseS
hR ss ses4 Ss as Ss
pS q %naHs e:
Ct the Board in rSssrd to hs matters G6sEgd
ssS
e usS the ayssas' se Sns:s
Of the officers Of election as before mentioned.
e %sa s s say gs
Of o The
aex Oi SohgIess, .,...:.
various l6s eS1 vote, Of parishes and
polls and others estimate fix the vote
Sss q or shfr
The evidence submitted to the Board, and which has
been descSsd to The produces
Co. THE ELECTION HAD BEEN AN ORGANIZED FRAUD.
s
appointment OF supervisors of registration the differ
ss a but
APPOINTED FROM THE RANKS THOSE VINO WERE OF.
o,, POSED EDIT TO saT I ssrU.IIs1E
5 az 1% s Is h s dcas
s re a
difficulties were thrown in the way OF regstration
Ing
centres Of population often without the place
and other fraua. and ;r LOT sG1 r;;,o.
SSS = ssss
ISL n
PG%sT H.
tns State fraud
hSa Ses on 70 us their Of the wrongs that
II te a Sa the off,
fa Of as have not by the
that and the who in fac. made the
:. ..-.s nlsc1iqs s.s GRANT s1ss.oss ~ ~
* as The bsors @
neir eecuon Is not certified BY the Governor OF the
s' Sss St sSss's: sns On Hs
@ d hS ECes to m have been
% e sS e. Ss siss Sss sls Ss
THE METHOD or COUNTING THE AND AscrnrArMxo
can only be regulated BY the law Of the State whether II
Joint rule regard to the constionaty 81 Which the
e give Of s behind ~
s sSaTS % az ssSI: sT Ss s
cia returns Q, inc committee offer no suggestions but
as they them e he other question.
and admission Of Senator from that State they
ApDxNDux bY NORTON.
AmaorV Of the committee were of the opinion that
no reference should be made in the report to the decision
OF the Supreme Court Of Louisiana which the
sss q KS I'd that q i
when the electors were 70 cast their votes
for Presidenr ana Vice PRESIDENT But Il seems
complete and the Senate would not % placed in pos
the character of that decision and that the fact that Il
was made AFTER the casting of the vote by the electors
would furnish sufficient why 1t should not be
referred to IA the report Decisions OF Courts last
t pSnH and nd . are held 70 relate back and
whole controversy. On the l4th day of Eovember
ls72 proceeding was commenced Tie Eighth district
Court OF Louisiana by the Attorney General on the in
formation Of the Returning Officers Of Elections 10 en-
ION what was called the Wharton Board from clnvassing
recurring the returns to be placed In the hands OF the
nch Board and to this suit Governor Warmoth Hatch
Daponte and Wharton were made parties This case
aPpeaied 70 me Supreme Court Of the Sato and By
Court held the Board consstno NJ No sra Ivnch