The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-02-21

property from anybody sucn o chiidyen in
S S
az e &c a@
q Ss s% This
ass .s e hsrs FSs barred
Ss sn Inc Il.
b, e., sssRs ssrs w her estate
ssS s. hsSs ssadS
leaving no lawful descendaS but %aer sv inc
s9 aar R tas a
70 the exclusion Of all her other relatives Of whatever
make no comments the policy of,his law of the
Justice It's tende ncIes and to
viii n e o bad Ss
are questions with which we have nothing to do in
ss ySg. 70 At Least
monty known MADAME JansS was born n sroyasnes
o sSs was nG The % n in @ o
esss ~
he ssm lily 'S h%
es until H ~ in % except aSs
ss ssais ss S s
h % sh ass u
se M the a%s Win nn Sss
q ssl s ne
she was during the remainder Of her long life, in the
Seeking 70 Conceded hat she was IN pos
Madame assSs Y s f e q
IoS @ ssI ,ss as ss sssS
Bowen was drowned prior the isa mai between
SS %arssa 'e ca1s o'a sna
PEELED from Providence prevent their becoming
The plaintiff claims that the two daughters, Polly and
G
he
as
sssy 'qiy s%y
q y Within eSls sScH - 1e us
lie W sds
e. n Fl n Ss
snS 'a Ss and
yoor est.%se daughter and ~ her sn Pfo
ns d t; s N r sa 4hs san1s he
SsasS SssS.s ssoS S,sS s
sssr s:.s
Sss OH de1 Ne aS y s Ss &c Ss
persons day obtaining good quality to the
s %s u Inc S
dcnce by comparison Of hands
se 81 Sadsm
s this On snf 70
Itself apart from any other evdence6ut that II there
a he s
for to hss
am Eliza M zee who e claimed since the death
%s has ss Il .4 a
sd @ wieS have
NOW, eenie%ea You viii rememee. both the evidence
% 'ns sRt: yea t s
a sa n IT. ct
knoWing It to be fabricated producing it as evidence
%insssSSe could e s%ii.s such 5 %a
evidence ffom other sources. IL, ,,..,,.
siss syasSss s sS
when be small boy he saw the paintiff when he
sas Ss ss sS sSwsn At ss
s En- ss on ne, fhen e. $ me a
s @ %Sss e. ssss
taking place between him and the woman. You heard
s S IL ass ssf ia snS %Rsn shs
% her to Srns h I Ct an w&S sn
ss sse Ssa Ds ss % of m. psn % sn s
Hull p credible witness as to the main facts which he al
% to
on & p 40 YoG @ VI vii
call both the manner and substance Of his testimony
utterly
case he has done this regard his own age and
the order Of his own birth IN his family and even the
sHs the ne ..s With ss pss in " Beisy
n ess sos old aDd
Re King Il Hsnry ses ss ddis S 4:
ssh lis
and hgs esmony be reconced with the fact he states,
sSTss ssFy
f s se ed
9 % :sS =; hs
iessa scnrsSift him Tss PsiniIG claims ast Se
ihss Rea
have inf infer that Dug bsd And
& s q nj Sss @ as d net M sss b4
S @ sGg o e c G e a a
aSsse eccns she
Of her former disgrace You are to determine whether
this Is probable or not
There is one witness whose deposition has been read
who Is said corroborates Hull in particular, and
that Maria A. Hall She tcsti6es TO having Betsy
Bowen at Mrs Masons and heard her speak Of her boy
buked her and said that she married woman and
Madame something 1t is for you to say whether
this person Nine JuneL -
leave tins subject of Hnls testimony by calling your
attention q given by eminent Judge, be APP
piled In testing the worth of evidence. Each of the
parties has invoked II In relation to witnesses the
other side for 70 say whether the rule fifty
II the circumstances respecting which the testimony
Is discordant be material and Of such that
takes may easily exist and accounted for with the
most good faith and probability reason for
ndusing the belief that the discrepancies arise the
nfrmfty OF the human mind rather than from deliberate
error But where the party speaks TO fact respectto
which ne cannot be presumed liable 70 mistake In rela