The Kenosha telegraph. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1860-1888, 1873-11-20
CIRCUIT COURT.
NON. ROBERT HARDNESS, JUDGE.

! The following cases have been disposed OF
st the present term of Court
+ Slate OF Wisconsin vs. Robert Brady. In
this Case the defendant was charged with
assault with intent 70 commit murder. on the
person OF Geo. Brown. Readers OF the TELH-
GRAPH Will remember the ARRAY between
Brady and Brown on the 2oth OF January last
at the gas once near the City Hotel where
the stab Ding OF Brown BIZ Brady occurred.
The jury returned verdict OF assault with
intent to commit granddaughter. Defendant
not yet sentenced.
Theodore L. Benedict vs. Geo Perrigo,
act len to recover possessions Of Sweepstakes
hreshin ing machine. which the plaintiff claim
ed to own. Tao defendant claimed to be the
owner OF one half of the machine. The prin-
ciple question between the parties was 90 to-
whether the defendant owned one half OF tho
siderable time. and at the close of evidences
the parties settled the case and withdrew Il
from consideration OF tho jury. Head g.
Qnarles for plant itf and We bster s. Lowell
for defendant.
James II. DeLong w Albert Vandermoon.
Action TO recover damages for g breach OF
warranty in the sale of = horse. Case ar'
psaled from Justice Court. The jury failed
TO axree. Judge Webster for piAiat,G, y 8.
Lowell 81. v, Quarles for defendant
]. N. Ssowell We City OF .MilwAukee. Ac-
tiUn to recover damages by reason ola change
of Atrcet grade in trent of the plaintiffs
premises on Virginia Street and Fifth Ave-
nue.. Verdict Gol plaintiff tor $l.645 so
jenkins & Z lott for plaintiff. Eail waller
for defendant. Er
Joseph StAdler Of al. vs. City of Milwaukee.
| Action to recover damages by reason OF the
raising of the street grAde!n front OF plain
t'tfS premises on 9Th st. between Welt and
Cherry. Verdict for plaintiffs for e2,4+4 IS.
Butler & Winkler for plSinliffs, Enil WAlbsr
Tor dctcndSn:.
r II Luecomb ct. al. vs City of Milwsu.
kee. Action fer damages for Lowering the
g'sds of street In front Of plaintiffs residence
90 All St Verdict for plaintiffs for 81 0S4 IL.
for defendant.
James JordOn vs. Chicago s. Northwestern
Railway Co Action TO recover damages tor
injuries sust Aimed by defendant In July 1868.
by r. asOn OF collision between himself with
hls team and one oil the defendants trains out
west OF Kenoshh. The Gaze was tried u year
ago this term. The jury disagreed 1t was
tried again this term and the jury failed 10
agree. Webster & Lowell for plaintiffs
Head d QuarleS for defendant.
STATE OF Wisconsin Us Lewis Myers. The
defendant pleaded guilty OF Larceny, Sem
ten=e not yet given
Stste OF Wisconsin VS. Lewis Morehouse, Jr
Defendant pleAdrd guilty OF larceny. Not
yet sentenced.
VIM. Borkenhagen vs. james Lieber. Ac-
ton To recover = certain sum for whiskey.
vine, beer. cigars, oysters, pop. lemonade
&c. from May to Dec. 1879 The defendant
denied having obtained any credit at the
plaintiff saloon during tho time mentioned
Verdict tor plaintiff tor SIS. %. The plaintiff
clnined sl6 90. Head & Qusrles for plain
tiff, Webster Il lowell for defendant
Nicholas PAuls Va Samlel T. Rice. Ac
ton to recover ealanc Of q years wages
for 40 II on the defendants farm Descendant
claimed that plaintiff did not work a fulI
year. aud that by his careIessns,s plaintiff
lost several sheep, and a large quantity of
potatoes il Jusun for painful. J. V.
QuArlrs Tor defendant. Verdict Tor defend
ant for 500 95
Daniel Knapp vs Eli G Runals. Action
to recover on two promm,ssory notes. De-
PENDANT claimed that he had paid and taken
up one Of the notes and hat he was not lis
bile on he 9th because he was only an en-
dOrser and the nO'a WAS not properly pro-
tested Webster & Lowell for plsinuf
| Major Psine OF Rac'na TOR defendant. Verdict
Tor plainiT TOR 1850 SO
! Matthew Murphy Va B. Hyde. Action
to recover images for killing plaintiffs COW
The defend ant undertook o amend his am
swer WITH II the case Tas Called tor trial. Toe
court he'd that The proposed amendment
would chang" the isaue and entitle the plain
tlff to con uuuAnce tor the term and costs
| wh"rrupcn he defendant read an nff1ltvit
| cdarVing the ju6g~ with prrjudics All asking
o have the case sent 10 some other County
or trial. Head 81 Quarlrs tor palntiff, j
Jitsun tOr defendant Y-s'e'dAy IN ,ruing
ths affidavit OF pre- JUDGE was thdrAwn and
nc case went To trial, ana rccupi ed the day
Verdict tor pOaintfY Tor $50 ii
---Ezz. 3d. Sr~----