, 1873-01-25

NO. 81 % ADOPTED "P9d by . n %S against ~ notV oung)
The whole Ordinance was then put to vote; votes we're in favour of it and 7 against 2no
After s%s% i minutes s o9%IP %oehl to vote for Member. of the Committee
(. . Voting tickets returned Ton6% sa1oTo absent Anthem received T. r@u6 and
~ Continuation of nt Discussion on Draft ofLabourRegmaH@s for the Sugar Estates of St..
9S Chairman y% Se@%d his seat t. t. the y59s.nso 4 -. ,. . s.
52n It: res 5:5 E @ :; A. : :s 5%; ss q 5 %%s $ :r $$ $ s S S5 sd ;% %@ & s$ % $4; os ssad 4 fl S o 5s:z s % %Zs$ e
dysafy oonotvH be done away T1 Ho%dh ike very much to hear The view Of planters
that IS 5% %$9 s% 5r 3 5s s%@s to 1 @S%y 5 Rss55 sS9 Si% sS%3 WITH With a s ao s@ss h H@@:
the P%2@%@%t e5o d%@os@ S 8% S1 nneo% &W %s n 2%% % S $s @s%"5? Me@%s
2Ssf &s % qo a5% % % % sS@ sa5.S S5 98 8% @9'h hs5 9 n 5' 6%& 2%% % o With 55 the he Pg@ @s? R9sas s
consideration %ath they are dIe~e2ia for Sugar Estates these again allimporant5% for re existence
so n@@ connected herewith, os sd%s%y to o a@% o HW%% of &9%I S @srH Stock Em@sT o
that on other stock estates the work IS done Without yearly anao, and the @5ouas do nS work
bb"@s mostly on % p%% %% %5 S So%@ IS T ro% os @% T " %@ G d" %% that 3F% %5 % ot%a
done %i in r% % oo3 with Ea " Mg question: as 5 the p@ooE54 on which in his opinion % n the Re Reg aoam for
ssopmag9s% @ Committee @To c1n ooHH o oan" % SeoTTa46 r@P0 @@ s S%ES Estates. The rules
are DIo included under %oB Regulations there ny Goj%%% many answered. sy We will not be-
put under oo2dl s% whats ought ODE dome for 8%os F%a@> entirely apart from the Sos" E"
sf D3 a had Rn p%%i @ mS Stock % Ea%o @u But the question Question PmO R Rn to be 8t to the v R%
object This Law is Intended for the Sugar Estates alone; if Regulations are wanted
But there is also this other reason, dnt the discussion on this question, the settlement Of vi%ma
I%%y~I13Id rot e pPd@qd by now introducing %aay new %@s. He would therefore also
n oG@%uh5 % "@o a % ? ing& si 9 teEi d HaeSs to L Sst E f %T Sm %S S T pnd dI risk o4c % 1%%s
a~oEo Q@to 5os% E9o3s,, do6 oosd understand the argument Of the honorable
9 3"m@ ? ? %@ %& BY g% early %o " be- 5 a% 9aa an! til" o@s 5@' +. %@ p % or SS 9 ans % %t like %
BY taking more hands butt consequently Sugar Estates will g1 o@ and ~gb@dpo hmoa gp
70, o 15 %%%G 2 1% S%5% a% S5 33o1 1. Ds% @ III & to 51 55n:@a53 @%s VII ' 5s detrimental sa sai %5 sass
Estates
on Sugar Estates without at 8mo tmem making something for Stock Estates, If these Regulations
ba adopted now, how IS it to be with the Stock Estates? they ought not be left without s@e
rh8t 60 after, either those 189 BROTHERS; bWh one question ought MOTTO be settled now
without the other The Commission hsm dos some hints on thee question: Quit has not considered
H@ta uHmrzedo make proposals on that head and the Chairman hHe expressed himself not apo
Hlb having oe rules, but til yearly contract Whatver cmesf it,, there must DO some
ruOSt COB VI regulating abm on Stock Estates and those Of 849@ can not Yell be used when
there are other for Sugar Estates 1t might be that glaton8 are not now strictly FOLLOWED out
on Stock Estates, but thu principles have always beer observed. Therefore, if the Council should
ntbe ncmedo take this question under consideration, the Government will have TODD 1t AND
ubsm must manatof for Stock EIat@a the same time aBr Sugar Estates
LIST Member for udeIned [SlumwJ believed the existing Regulations have no been applied
on Stock Estates at htn Mm West md Quarter:
9th rwunemberI J@I rped that his experience goes to ueS Stock Estates IN E@Mnd
Quarter The Pnocp" pon@f the Regulations Of H49 arr used on those properties; 3ehOG1
rB have fixed money wages although hey to certain extent receive them in the form of pHTe
g9j they have oenm edNladendanoai not by yearly agreement wha physician hpW VISIT
only. one thing the working hor, are not the same
2d Member fore hrStansed[ HmmJs said he wmenba8H shat when hew was CONlcutEa
toni nteI Island applications were made to the Pdcemashn our present VcemVeTC, to learn II
it were permhtedt9t take people by the week to picks cotton; which proves tina the Regulation
were considered as being for Handed properties including Stock Estates which is even Showed
by heh heading of those Regulations He believes shat all contracts on Estates up here in EahHd
Quarter are yearly and the people have the anne rights and obligations son Sugar Estates in as
ia as they can be chad Therefore, he could not see how the Commission could have come ha re-
suit, in framing its proposal sod different from the oMnn mdmmtonO of Governor Bile, as express
@di his Lder where the Commission charged to revise the IaMur Regulations; but hen the
Commission leaves livestock Estates to themselves and say eguMOusa are nOtu required there
2 Membrfr Cnthnstd Country District [Romam& observed that there are Sook-Es