The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-05-27

TO I've favorable to peace were elected without re
rard 80 Their political opinions, hence the wide
among them on tue important question OF the
form OF governments. The Assembly WOULD, how
dent II ne wo,Ia govern according to their Will
rms, however, he refuses to do, and under the CIR
cumstances they are
CoRREsPoNDENT-l dc not understand, for my
part, why NJ. Theirs insists In imposing his will
upon the Assembly in this way. 1t is certainly con-
ern the many.
N. LIE DUO DE BRooLIE-In the first place. be-
cause ne Is very positive and has unlimited conf
dence IN MS own foresight and judgment believing
tnat ne aone is capable of saving the country; be-
Assembly does not represent the viii OF the coun-
try.
MISREPRESENTATION it does or not he can
not surely think he represents it with his protec
ZIONIST principles
NJ; LIE Duo DE BRoGLIE-No; for the tendency Of
public opinion at present is to free trade. Mon
arcnlsts and republicans are agreed upon that and
not only In France but al over Europe.
NO HOPE FOR A MONARCHY.
CORRESPONDENTS there no hope that the mon
aren,cal party WIN be able to unite on candidate
nope AZ present. Count de Chambord and the Or
leans princes show little inclination to become
MINOR Importance II It were not or one OF principle
that underiles IT, The legitimlsts, or partsans OF
nenri Va are very positive and unyeang IN their
pIiuClpies, which, intoxicating the doctrine OF the
uvne rgnt OF kings, are such as the real monarch
ical party OF France can never accept. The diff
Guilty OF fusion OF the two parties Is, therefore,
greater than 1t at first sight seems. The heads or
the Two parties would be obliged to shake hands
II their adherents would. 1t Is really question OF
principle, and not OF persons, might at first be
supposed The result il that the two mOnarchical
partles winch, united, would have strong majority
IN the Assembly. divided are pOwerless, and N.
Theirs Is absolutely master OF the situation.
NEW ASSEMBLY.
CORRESPONDENT-Under the circumstances It
seems to me that the only course LETT open would
be FOR the present Assembly to dissolve and give
way to new one, which, elected under other cir.
cumstances than the present. would probably
count united monarchical majority.
NJ. LIE Duo DE BROGLIE-TO tell the truth, that Is
more than doubtful. With universal Suffrage as 1t
now exists It is not at all sure that new Assembly
would be monarchical, and there Is the difficulty.
An election might only make matters worse. No,
the composition OF new Assembly might be
worse than this one, and involve the country
IN another civil war.
CORRESPONDENTS you think no change may be
looked Tor sOOnf
M. LIE Due DE BROGLIE-NO; think things must
go on as they are, with the Republic such IL Is ;
certainly until the final liberation Of the territory
or-the death Of M. Theirs. We are getting ON very
well under the present regime. Consolidating our
nnances, re0rganizing our army, re-establishing
our credit, liberating territory we have
scarcely time to think OF change and, in short,
everything tends to at least temporary con-
tinuation OF the Republic.
CoRRESPONDENT-And after M. Thiers3
M. LIE DUO DE BROGLIE-After that do not pre-
tend TO see my way. The death OF M. Theirs Just
now would be great misfortune for France, and
leave us In situation out OF which 1t Is difficult to
see our way.