The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-01-18
desk but closely watching the documents as put in

witness stated. In reply TO question from Mr.
Peckham. that he did not know OF any other books
papers relating to the proceedings Of the Board
| OF Audit.
| Mr. Lynes was then crosse xamined, after dis
cussi0n, as to the nature OF the questions to be
asked. In every instance the defence took excep
ton to the rulings The witness stated In relation
to the routine at the Comptroer's office. thai
when warrants relating to the county liabilities
were returned from the Chamberlains ONCE to the
Comptroler's once, they were not always filed In
by him. but In some instances by County Auditor
Watson. ht 50
novel feature In the crosse Examination Of MIR
Lyncs was his being handed the minutes of his tes
timony on the Hagerty and Baulch examination,
and asked to read questions and answers, and say
whether he would give the same answers now.
Fnl sAPE MAKER.
On the prosecution calling John Mcbride David.
son to the stand, the defence made this objection
The frst count alleges that there was . genuine
liability presented to the Board OF Audit by KeyseE
Co.. and that the Board did not doubt il; while
ON the second and fourth counts they SET
forth that the claim was wholly manufactured, and
on the third that it was partly true and partly
false. Now, on the Hall trial this witness was
brought up 10 prove the claim to be wholly also,
and council now demanded that the prosecution
Judge Davis-I imagine that they viii not prove
any particular count 70 DO true and faise-there is
Counsel for defence-Tncre is danger Of every.
thing rom the way they have acted.
Hall trial; Isee nothing In the obiection-they are
not restricted nom proving the nature Of any Claim,
Oounsei-They state the claim to be genuine,
and they state Il 10 be augmented two-thirds
Judge Davis overruled the objection.
Mr. no viA fhovn tanA hot IN n n uafn
manufacturer. doing business In Duane street; ne
dld work for the CITY In 1870; ne made up his bill
Q. How much was that forf NO oe. .,
Counsel object 70 .ae question ana answer.
S na
as res S'stSr atsos ocea, and Ar Tweed not being
The witness then testined to his claim being for
$1,000. which was raised In the warrant TO
34s,17o o. out of which he got check for $l6,o4o
woodward he was flrst asked to write his II name
he was MT then aware that the sum had been
- TwEED's xlDDLs-xEk.' '.aa" . 2 e"
In reply TO Mr.. Fullerton the witness stated that
ne did business with the clry for tour or Ave years
w what with Mr. GT ased Tie til for slsaso was
presented In the usual form: from first to last he
had no business with Mr. Tweed about safe Or
anything else; no one was present except Mr..
Watson; when the latter put the war ant race
and Mr. Watson said, "You endorse IT." he did
not prevent him In any other way from turning It,.
Snaf ba psSsDiS az Sid Keep ms 1and ga ~
I Mr.. Fuuerton-An tho timer A. No. sir.
Q; Did you think it extraordinary that he laid
Pc 9. There was nothing unusuaI-nothing to excite
y your Suspicion Nothing; he said iou en-
r. ANDREW J. GARvEY,
was here called upon. Defendants counsel asked
the Clerk FOR the Indictment against that witness,
him when ne came INTO Court. aTe RlY.fU
When 4r. Carney was seated and sworn ne tes-
titled that his occupation was that OF plasterer,
and he did work for the city and had claims against
the city In 1870 for work done and some contracted
to be done; Mr.. woodward and himself had con-
with woodward he put in claim for $4,000,
partly for work done and partly ior work to be
done; he claimed $7Scoo for work done on the
county 0f1ces and $4,000 for work oh the armo-
rtes there were also claims against Woodward
hemmed IN closely in his statement OF clalms, and
should not be allowed to work on individuals.
That witness was presented to them under
z TWO INDICTMENTS FOR FORGERY
In the third degree, and had come before him to
gain his liberty from two state Prison OFFENCES,
paricipator in these alleged irauds No witness was
ever on the stand with sucn inducements held
out to him to save himself He ought 70 be held
to the strictest line OF examination, and not al
lowed, as the prosecution want him to do to force
IN individuals, by testfytng TO conversations with
have driven from their jurisdiction BY their founda-
tiOnless indictments. The Testimony now offered
the defendant.
The Court admitted the testimony as competent
az ainst the company A recess Was here taken.
. After R.c.... -
The audience began to reassemble In Court at
quarter past one O'Clock, and the general appear
snce o. the room was megi9e IN the extreme and
was the nrst gentleman on the peoples side Of the
mouse 10 appear; ana, rs ne entereu the anter00m,
Mr.. tweed caugot signt OF nun through the open
door 81 the PACK o! the !nry Oox. MT. Tweed arose
very rapidly ana walked INTO the anteroom,
ana LOOK position near the door and
within three feet OF 0arvey Both men were
standing ana were admirable contrasts.
9arvey, TAI, sIIagnt ana good-l00king,
nad pleasant, quiet demeanOr ana expression.
Tweed cOrpuient ana nowsy-o0king, was
vioiently ana nervouslv agitated with the anger