The Middlebury register. [volume] (Middlebury, Vt.) 1850-1882, 1873-12-16

Monkton; WIN. NJ .Partch, w Mcintyre
New Haven X G Wood, T Lewis
Orwell; Madison Converse, Panton; q
A Phillips, Ripton j W Thomas, Sails
bury; G A Cutting, Joseph Stickney,
Shoreham; W Clifford. Starksboro !;
+ NJ Strong, r NJ Clapp. vergennes /;
+ d Barton, Waltbam; II b Jacobs.
Weybridgc; A II Hubbard, Whiting
The following causes were taken up
and disposed of as follows:
Oliper Severance VS. Israel E. Eddy
Stewart Il Eldredgc, helps, Ballard,
attys for pltf. For diff. Spalding, Herd
Rider, Dillingham;. Action on note given
by diff. 10 another party for patent right
of gate. Jurors we're called and part
of the testimony taken for the plaintiff,
when owing to an error in a deposition.
a continuance was asked and granted.
George J. Flanders VS. E. H. Matte.
son--E. II. Wright for ptf A. p.
Upper for diff. Action of trespass.
Verdict for pltf. Damages 500.
Fanny CaSaceu VS. E. II. Matteson.-
Slade and Stewart attys for pltf For
diff. A. P. Upper. Action for tresspass.
Verdict for pltf. Damages S53.
City Of Vergennes VS. Dyer g. Brigham.
--Graudey L. Chapman attys for pltf.
Stewart Il Edredge, Lucia, Phelps and
Harl for diff. Action of ejoctment. Jury
called and testimony taken when the
plaintiff entered II nonsuit.
c. G Herrick VS. Vim. II. II. Dia.-
Clark and Dunton attys for pltf. Stur.
tevant and Slade for diff. Action for
damages for assault and battery. Yer.
dict for plaintiff to recover of defendant
$50 and costs.
Homer p. Hayes VS. Warren Stearns
Ell al.-Lamb e. Tarbell and Dunton attys
for pitt, Boyden, Mardin and Spalding
for diff. Action of trespass, to recover
the value of logs taken by defendant from
the possession of the officer. Verdict for
plaintiff. Damages S23.36.
State VS. ". H. Fl. Dir.-Respondent
arraigned for selling intoxicating liquors
without authority. Pleads guilty OF two
offepses and fined $40 and costs.
State VS. W. r. Wright -Respon.
dent arraigned to answer to an informa.
ton charging him with selling liquor.
Pleads guilty to five offenses and being
the second conviction was fined 500 and
costs
State VS. Bristol q. Gaines -Respon.
dents arraigned to answer to an informa.
ton charging them with selling liquor
without authority. Specifications called
for and furnished. States Attorney Lucia
tor State. Grandey and Stewart for
Respondents. Respondents plead guilty
Of five offenses and fined $50 and costs
State VS. John B. Ferson. Indictment
for horse stealing. Pleads guilty. Sen.
fenced to hard labor in the State prison
at Windsor for the term of three years
and to pay costs of prosecution.
State VS. Patrick Ryan.-Arraigued
to answer to an information charging him
with selling Intoxicating liquor. Pleads
guilty to five oifenses and fined $50 and
costs.
State VS. Joseph Bushey.--R Respondent
arraigned to answer to an information
charging him with the crime of horse
stealing. Pleads guilty and is sentenced
to three years Imprisonment at hard la.
Dor in the state prison at Windsor, and
to pay costs of prosecution.
State VS. George Sexton RESP onden,
arraigned to answer to an information
charging him with the crime of burglary
Pleads guilty and is sentenced to two
years Imprisonment at hard labor in the
state prison at Windsor and to pay costs
OF prosecution.
State vs. Charles Adams. - Respondent
called to answer to complaint against him
for selling intoxicating liquor withou,
authority. Failed to appear and bal
was forfeited.
State VS. Le,cis Respondent
called to answer to complaint against him
for selling intoxicating liquor without
authority. Failed to appear and bal
forfeited.
State VS. Thomas Maroney Respond
ent called to answer complaint agaips
him for selling intoxicating liquor with
ont authority. Failed TO appear ant
bail forfeited
State vs. T. y. SmiM.-Responden
arraigned for selling intoxicating liquo
without authority. Some Of the witnesse
were "out of town." and the ono VIII
was upon the stand had never known o
the sale of liquor by the respondent
Verdict of not guilty and the responder
discharged
State VS. Myron Fales.-Called t
answer to an indictment for adultery
Failed to appear and bail forfeited.
State VS. Ira C. Foster.-Arraigne
for selling intoxicating liquor withou
authority. Plead guilty to eight secou
otfenses and fined $3.50 and costs.
State VS. Henry Clemmons. Respond
ent called to answer an indictment fc
, larceny. Failed to appear and bail fol
feited.
! State VS. A. II Summer Responder
: arraigned for selling intoxicating liquo
. States Attorney entered nolle pros. G
account of the absence of witnesses.
State VS. Martin Dike.-On accour
s of the absence of witnesses the Stat,
! Attorney entered nolle pros.
e In all the State cases, States Attorne
d Lucia conducted the prosecution.
Il augustus Taylor VS. John Fish
!, Deioulted aud Clerk to assess.
q Maria Sipple VS. VIM. H. Sipple.-
!. Libel for divorce. Grapdey & ChaI
Il man attorneys, Bill granted for intoleri
n Bile severity. Libellant to resume h,
II maiden name.
= John L. Hammond Va Psosper Ell
tharp -Defaulted Clerk to assess.
n Philamier Hanks vs. Ward Bullar,
= -Detaulted. Clerk to assess.
I .hacheu vs. Hammond. This ca