Staunton vindicator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1860-1896, 1873-10-10

and they will be put in circulation in four
or five days
They also resolved to enforce the city
lines ON Church Street and all other streets.
COURT OF APPEALs.-The following is
summary of the business done in the Su-
preme Court of Appeals since our last re-
port
Shaver VS.. Swartz & Levy, rule awarded
against appellant to enter new supersedeas
bond in the penalty Of 81, 900 by Oct. 10th !;
Maury VS.. Chesapeake u Ohio R. r. Co.,
continued till next term Armentrout VS..
Derron dismissed, appellants having failed
to mature the case appeal allowed from
decree of Rockingham circuit court in
Baugher's admir-, &C., VS.. Conrad's admir-,
&C., and bond of 800 required Gate
woods admir- VS.. Goode. &C., argued by
Sheffey & Bumgartlner for appellant and
Pendleton for appellee, and submitted !;
Ruckman, &C., VS.. Lightner's ex'or, ar
gued by Sheffey for appellant and Hanger
for appellee, and submitted John Craw-
ford, &C., VS.. Rudolph Turk, Sheriff, ar
gued and submitted by Niche & Elder for
appellants and Baldwin & Cochran and
Sheffey & Bumgardner for appellees Isaac
Hardesty VS.. F. S, Raglan, &C., decree of
circuit court OF Rockingham affirmed,
Woodson for appellee and Baldwin for ap-
pellant VIM. II. Tams vs. Samuel Brana-
man, decree of Augusta county court con-
frmed, Niche, Sheffey & Bumgardner for
appellant and Baldwin & Cochrane for APP
pelle; Lockridge VS.. Lockridge, submitted
on notes of argument; on petition of VIM.
A. Anable on writ of error from Henrico,
the Judge Of the Hastings Court of Rich
mond was authorized to bail Anable; White
and wife VS.. McGammon, submitted on
notes of argument Bowman, Jr. vs. Mil
Ter, &C., on motion to require the assignee
in bankruptcy of the appellant to execute a
new supersedeas bond, motion overruled
Winchester & Potomac R. r. Co. VS.. o., A.
& Manassas r. R. Co. dismissed by consent
of the parties, Conrad & Parker for appel
liant, Robertson & Tucker for appellee
Dice VS.. Keagy, &C., argued and submit
ted, Shelley & Bumgardner for appellant,
Fultz & Roller for appellees.
Rives vs. Farish's admir- and Armentrout's
ex or VS.. Gibson, &C., submit ed Executor
Of Cofman, ST. VS.. Shafer, submitted, Shelf
fey, Bumgardner and Johnston for appelees
and Woodsoon & Roller for appellants
DECISIONS.
White and wife VS.. McGammon, decree of
Frederick circuit court reversed and remand
ed for further proceedings, Judge Moncure-
delivering the opinion of the court Parker
for appellants, Clarke & Moore for appellee.
Goss, &C., VS.. Southall, Judgment of Abe
marie circuit court affirmed, Christian de-
livering the opinion of the court Watson
for appellants, Niche, Robertson and South
all for appellees
Crawford vs. Crawn's ex or, decree of
Rockingham circuit court reversed, Ander-
son delivering the opinion of the court
Baldwin & Cochran for appellant, Fultz d
Roller for appellee,
Bowman, Jr., vs. Price, decree of Rock
ingham circuit court affirmed, Staples deliv-
ering the opinion of the court; Roller for APP
pellant.
Williams adm RS VS.. Skinker and wife,
decree Of Frederick circuit court affirmed,
Christian delivering the opinion Of the court,
and Anderson delivering an opinion and
Bouldin and Staples dissenting Robertson
and Williams for appellants, Conrad & Par
ker for appellees.
Forrer VS.. Cofman, &c. judgment of
Rockingham circuit court affirmed, Staples
delivering the opinion of the court. Woodson
for Plaintiff in error and Yancey for Defen-
dant in error
Gatewood's admir- vs. Goode and wife, &c.
decree of Bath circuit court affirmed, Boul-
din delivering the opinion Of the court Shelf
fey & Bum.ardner for appellant and Pendle-
ton for appellee.
Marshall VS.. Pidgeon, &c, decree of Fred
erick circuit court reversed and case remand.
ed, Christian delivering the opinion of the
court Conrad & Son for appellant, Barton
Boyd, Hunter & Holiday for appellees.
Brumbaugh VS.. Wissler's ex'or, judgment
of Shenandoah circuit court reversed. Boul-
din delivering the opinion Of the court, Will
liams & Williams for Plaintiff and Harris for
Defendant.
Sively vs. Campbell, &C., decree of Allie
ghany circuit court affirmed, Bouldin deliv-
ering the opinion of the court. Mays for
Plaintiff, Parrish for Defendant.
Eavy VS.. Lands, &C., from Rockingham,
dismissed for want of requisite bond
Switzer VS. Switzer, and Swoope's admir-
VS.. Swoope's admir-, continued till next
term.
CHAM AND EGGS. Nobody can COM
plain of the extravaganza Of the Staunton
common council or it's overseers of the poor.
A few weeks since one of the "out of door
benefciaries' poor fellow, dying with con-
sumption, was discovered in expanding his
pittance in that luxury of the proud and
hioh horn ham and epps At the next meet