, 1873-03-21
NEW PUBLICATIONS.
Lcun1 WOrlkn,


by Attachment. pctavo COS m. boston: Little
Brown i o.. Chicago: T. b. Myers 4 Go.
Though tho remedy by attachment Is known
to the English Inv only aa ono Of tho unwritton
customs Of tho City Of London, 1t lias been
adopted in caoll Of our thirey-sevon statoa with
30 much uniformity Of cnactnlont in aubEtance
and In form aa to rondor troatl6o on tho
LAM OF attachments throughout the| United
States not only ontiroly foasib1o, but
aa available for ready roforonco by tho lawyers
of each State az II wo had uniform nthtnle OF
attachments throughout Tho ontlro Nation.
Every slato pormits an attachmont 10. Issue
agaii,st non-rcsilont, abscouding, or concealed
defendants, and against these who nro removing
or conccalng thoir property, or avoiding ncryico
Of procoss. Massachusetts and Connecticut ro-
qure no special roason, but, for any debt, attach
all property not exempt from execution. 1lli-
noiB and several othera add tho case whoro tho
debt auod for Ia contracted frAululeutly. Mig
souri, and Arkansas add tho caso where tho
dobtor has obtained posHcsBion of properly
fraudu1ontly; aud Missouri adds tho case
Of damagcR arising from tho commission
Of some crime, or tho seduction Of any fomalo
CTho Missouri solonB commit the common orror
Of nsauming Tint the term "fomale" sufficiently
designatos woman.)
While Chief Justice Drakos treatiBo, there
foro, relates to q branch of practice under the
general Btato statute in which thoy might bo OK
peotod to differ greatly, careful perusal Of tho
several Btatutea themselves, nB summarized In
tho appondix, shows that their differences aro
SO insignificant as to render tho docisiona and
practice In either of tho States as authoritative
In tho others as they would bo OH question
of common Inv. or 1896 cases which
nro citod, and tho points III which mako up tho
uooy - 1nls "oin, III oo' ~ aie An'efioah, ~
the Ao1'oana ~ aro from ropo1ts 1Hs Of m tho UNIT
fror, to ronnrts =, t1a ra-,o,s atntos y, SsrIo,
from the reports ol tne various otates III various
ratios. from 449 for Massachusetts, to for Me-
braska and Oregon respectively. It docs not i'll
cludo tho special statutes giving attachmonte IN
49,. =, CIT. ..,,,t, ..,s;,,et -: .sa .a.a.,..
toa - o ss"so o1u1so ae"lue. e'ipa unu tosnole'
but only attachments which arc coilatoral to
suits ngainst poraons. II is tho first general
American troatiso on this subject. covering
~ ,1,o ct,to, "a ,..a,,,a ~. ,,,aaa ~
~ w. w '."so'' Soups, W. tuueo' ~
ta .no casGa of ahy vG!uo WmSa have ever
yhloh u the following arc .! f 9artlal outline: o.
.no causgs u acllon ~ u WHICH A'taeents tae Iay
issue o. causos Jor "nit1, Ell q! a'taen!nsn,h
asnuu; eoto5Lluns M - @ ino anuns; tne
execution ata return OF the attaennlons; age,nss
teal osiAto' neAHab' lolsonal property very
vaiunulo chaptUr oh s'nulsat!9nns, ..3, SUI
cesslso, co1tl'eelnB, anu IdauaHlcnt ~
nchlnentb y! cuhsoay u pAt nAu aeA'ots
ponua; oa ihllotGlaoi. aitHennu,'so, ama
noT u,ahplved' VI no.ica " pupsa'on y. 6as
hIau1!ens, anH IoW 8asnlsiee nlay pu cnatgcu'
capacity e!la aolilty o. garhl;shee n VARIOUS as-
re9ss asaanSt n.!a ndu Hs aeiu.sn'
Lu ~ m ny " acton aoi a.tasn
anu ne nooK a. ~ wei prm.ea, Ieang % MorN Sns
IL y4a ~ ~ - s'seutea ~ NY .ds, a.,u
nss an,y' ata, ~ ~ ~ ~ No. I"I 5anit ~
o era %o 90 no. aouos 'ne psoioa
pHisTrpp III IN TME - coUuTs 81 rE n
UNIFIED HTATEs AND ENaLASD. BY JAMES /.
I11aH, Counselor ut LAW Chicago: Callahan {. Co.
1873. 642 pp.
Tho title OF this work Is perhapn slightly inno
ourato, na 1t doen not rolato oxclrinvel mainly
to injunutionsfn In tho courts Of the United States,
but to in1unctionB in tho courts Of the several
StatcH. These courts i,a tho United Statos,
but they arc not courta Of tho United ststop,--a
distinction which has heretofore wisely been oh
scrrod by law-writera. Tor instance, tho staud-
ard United States DIgest of decisions In State
courtB, is entitled "DIgeat of tho Decisions Of
Courts Of Common Law and Admiralty IN tho
no use the torn "Felofal" or National" todcs-
ignato tho United Etates courts, no such terms aro
known to the law, and thoir proper designations
are the Supreme, Circuit, or District " Courts Of
tho ] rease docs emo not ~ specially s app 5p S'
We arc also ut loss to interpret our authors
expression in his preface, Of a" firm conviction
that the bene0eont System of equity, whose
Of Is desne1 o a
clusp, Of modornIswroforplsru % and codiers M % land
to constitute for NIL time M integral part OF
our jurion1,,lenco." Law-retormofa have not
nor nor NJ my y o:hor function Of eauity Courts
YhoT havo touched tho subject only to confido
equity powers aud law powerg to tho Same Julro
Or court aud this Is done in Illinois, aa wel as
- s ~ nsnsIa n niiAest nNo oouo y It!c.iee,