Carson daily appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1873-1877, 1873-05-07
OUR SCPHEME CO. .<A,

1t was to be hoped after the las: elec
ton. when the State got two new Judge
ON the bench of the Supreme Court tha;
the people could depend uhon getting
cases decided that come before them, but
it appears the old le,,ven is Yet there.
The Supreme Court of California does
more business in one month than tht
Court Of Nevada does in two Years.
hle1 petition III the court in June.
1911, for a simple mandanus that any
court or Judge would have decided in !,
few days, but after keeping it in the
court more than n year and half the
caS.. Was Withdrawn. and no decision.
In II .rch last l filed another similar Pc
titiun with the court, and from present
indication it will sleep the sleep that
knows no waking---Iurosu correspond
ence Sue U,.ioa.
We also have bone to pick with the
Court. There Is II little matter of Il
bridge question now before the Court,
which interests Wishoe county very
much. and which We hope the Coart
will decade at once. As the matter now
stands L lke's road is sadly out of reptir,
anu the Road Sapervis Is prevented
from doing anything until the Court ren-
Gers its decision. 1t is Very annoying to
sly the least. 1t seems to US the Court
c,,Cld decid. the question IN Il Very few
MINUTES. -Nsuddi Strte Journal.
In Justice to the Supreme Court
the following statement of facts i
due. namely The Aurora CORE
spondent of the sac aalent, Union
is nobody more II r less than one
q Col" sam Young. and he it is that
thus irays his own private matters
before the pablo and III doing SD ex-
hibits his willingness to find fault
even at the expense of the truth.
Here are. III substance. some of tue
facts of the case which exrites his
grumbilng propenSities Young
sued the authorities of Esmeraldl
county for il certain sum Of money
seventy five dollars, or such u mat
ter. That Is to say, the Supreme
Court of this State, being petitIonrd
by Young. through his counsel,
Thos. Mells, Esq did issue man
d.llnu~ and Mr. Y.uns's little dab Of
mouey was paid to him. As to the
when and how the thug was done,
these following statements lnstrare
the disposition of the Court t" exp--
dite matters aud save trouble and ex-
pense to litigauts: The original pc
titiun III the case Wa imperfect, an.
Judge CARRIER went SO far as to Call
Judge Mesick and Mr. Wells togeth-
er and have them agree upon the
form Of petition. Some delays sue.
ce-.led, but thev were delays of
counsel. ar if not of Counsel, Of :
Young himself for LIST as sDon ~
the amended petition came int"
Court it Was acted On, the n.n.lamu~
issued aud MIR. Young got his
money. Having thus far succeeded, 1!
he brought sult for more money |
- hich he claimed the county Of Es-
meralda owed him but Judge Me
sick having chosen to Contest tue
Case, AS We understand upon grave
constitutional grounds, the case Is
somewhat deia, ed-but not ut all
delay ed by ACTON or uOn-actiun of
tine Court Itself. So much for Mr..
Young an.l ais case aIiL now IL few
words Will, it il hoped, serve t. curb
the i,npatienc.. Of the very able but
hat imperative law cOln,nenta
tor who presId-s over the h.te Ju-
sai: II IS not yet - mouth s,nce the
Lake bridge case Mas argued and
10 be precise alb ,it tue
matter, it Was argued gu the lU.u uf :
April last, and then taken under AL
II Is quite ALI Important I
Case and entitled tu very patls.nt ,
b, the Court; auu 1t IL but
fair to aid that n decision in this :,
Case could not be hal with ut doing 4,
thr manifest inj Justice Uf giving 1t
I,r-cesience over other Caves which
stand before it in the order Of bust
ness.
We have volunteered tn flir mt