The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1873-02-17

and announce the fact the floor OF the joint con-
vention; On Monday evening, previous 70 the cleo
and j. C. Horton and have them come to wttness'
room, as York had an important communication 70
ma maze aney came ana aotn stated that Poneroy
evening, and said that II
PoMgRoY OFFERED HIM MONEY
for his vote he had made up his mind accept and
expose him, as had been suggested; these present
told York It was his duty to do so; they examined
the room and shortly after midnight York returned
and told weness that he had been TO see PomerOy
and that i was success ccs Ycrs showed witness
Rs satsG @S.ss III nos e 9S VIZ
James, nss on %.ne
told Ingalls, that Q man 10 whom Pomeroy had paid
money would expose him on the door, and that
DR.. 8. A. Logan. OF Leavenworth, brother of olive
Logan, an aspirant for Senatorial honors and OPP
whatever with PomerOy as to Withdrawing in
Pomeroys favor; that he had o conversation with
OFFERED LARGE SUN OF MONEY
to vote foT by one Of
money, but the committee thought otherwise, ana
the witness gave the name OF Hon. A. II. Horton,
United States Attorney for the District OF Kansas.
The witness sta*ed that from many conversations
e 80 % as Se
Of men could DO discovered. they were opposed to
". r Downs, of Atchison, testified that he was
here during the Senatorial canvass; that he knew
OF no money or other corrupt influences being used
BY Pomeroy 70 advance his election, but that on
the contrary, he had every reason to believe that
none had been psed by him; witness saw Pomeroy
several times . day; witness did not give TO Ed
ward Clark any sum OF money whatever, and the
sworn stateineAt heretofore made by witness he
desired to again anrm; witness met Jonn 4. Mar,
Witness that E %oS they
both agreed teet York meant nothing friendly BY
information TO be used against P0meroy: they
deemed 1t wise 20 say word BY way or caution to
Pomeroy, and witness entered Pomeroy's room for
heard what he had to say, and witness retired; at
snat v Jme witness saw m Pomeroy's room Pomeroy
as the V't that his
SENATOR YORK MEANT MISCHIEF
and desired 20 say so: witness left, giving Pome-
CLARK in 1851, and continued Co know him for two
him until January a, 1874 in Topeka at the hotel
witness approached him a. an old acquaintance;
had some general conversation with him. Here
member ofthe committee asked the sense OF the
5000 alleged to have been paid to Clark to hush
PRIvxrE SCANDAL IN BALTIMORE,
put upon another member stating thar the ZOO
received by Clark was in relation to the Ross let
ter there arose considerable discussion about
tindale scofeld and Hutchings-did not believe
Pomeroy wrote the Ross letter. Mr.. sconeld
offered resolution that bribery and corruption,
as used IN the resolution appointing the commit
tee, meant the otter of money, ONCE other valu-
able thing by PomerOy, or his agent, to MEN,
however, Withdrawn and the witness proceeded
with his testimony He stated that ne did not in
any interview with Clark give him any sum Of
money for any purpose whatever; ne arranged
for an interview between Clark ana Pomeroy,
which took place, but what occurred witness was
not advised; the witness had been secretary to
Pomeroy and knew bis writing and had seen tac
sinfle OF the Ross letter purpOrting to have been
written by Pomeroy; the witness stated that he
had not formed an opinion as to whether 1t was
York to be one Of the most violent opponents to
POmeroy.
The House yesterday tabled a resolution requiring
members to individually appear before the COM
pittee and give in their experience by very large
majority. In the committee this morning a men,
Der stated that he seriously doubted whether
Pomeroy had used any money whatever IN the can
vass, except In the case of York, and even upon
that his mind was not sufficiently clear.