New-York tribune., 1873-12-16
limited STATES SUPREME COURT.

w.su1NGroN. Dec 15-The case OF the Union
p,cs, R,,rosd sgt Permission Treasurer OF Lincoln "v' '
.,ps, from the Circuit Court for NebrssSa. v" neoo
Court to-day Tie question 10 this case vas "be'nei % ~ ~
-, c,uo,,v II, -ueh an ns,runsuiy Of he 0o'efn"c" I'll
,n,,. /, from STATE under the Federal '"n-'
r. the .pnon oi the Justice Strong In substance
says; ....,,, ,,,,i,n,., and
M iepepiesy Of the Constitution Of the Une states sal
spaefi, ca from and th, may DC efs ere
;;ny or eaned within the territorial oo"H'iI h IS
:1,,.s,, Of Ss stat to the ''' Fr, Goysn~sn ehs expressly
or BY ns:sirI m n n IN . gns t extent power
belonging 70 the states hs ooa 1t i,,sns No Que
ever before the adoption Of e Consultation 81 we
sstes each Of the States oosseed unlimited pSsftto "a. . ~
indirectly s aud property within thsr . ~ ,s
polls Orhy ine on internal production h e,
tain treaties which bal sstc,o1 setn Of this power cser
cns tas STATS Inspection said in lsne COUNTY az,
a9i ptIco'' "aa sls,e. rs%aiaei aud remain, entire
Ih.,adrg . Con;'g'cn =, ss oncr,l oSsramep
,Da IN be o, tar upon subject by both Governments the
clam 1 U1a ss, 1s n' ,Ssas sssa' The sIe5 ~i .
be mole which .h & b s5'I'S M S, ie sppS 81 ny
exercise Of the power That discretion Is restricted ONLY by
% viii Of q; ssRfi s y 'nS SaS 10. be 90 burden
OF embrs.. ihs operations. Of the Nsioaa Gosshmfna Ias =
by nsOuaI legislatures 10 The eIlt Jus. INDEBTED II Is
a complete in the ste The Ike PoFe "Dn 'H' ~ '' '''
SSH W. me oincn We nave expressed heretofore and adhere to
them The tax in question hel 20, 70 o % e 10 he r ,b,, ,esos
Inhibited BY Consultation; TO ho other"e ~ sau Eoul pe 20
leyea BY state from the reach Of fee TAXATION
pe,'9H , ,s9, OF su.Rs S RsGy s subject upon
laid Admitting o Mat the e sG"gy s yCo, 1s y Il e eot o i
linton Pscsc railway ponpsry Ws 5I was held that the
property COMPANY not esmp, Sass the 'os va,
United and largely Tor the use and o W,
The Company Is case were ne aseSs G 2. ,n GOV
po..s may considered settled that no constitutional implications
meat merely the property Of such an gen
CONTRARY doctrine would greatly emo1fas' he sa 10 we
.e on'Ii S loy5 On .teeutons Of the powers
Sys,0me,, n beonss 70 Governments, sgen only
u.e bn their agencies United states mails troops
nd muu.ion carried almost ever taroad
Telegraph employed in the National s,ree 80 s e
horses coaches wagons toulas snip ya na mutt
msuuaung establishments ihe'e are ne properly OF ns
uonL persons corporations, who e instruments OF agents
Of General Government and The, are The hands BY
which the objects OF the OoyYnmsnt are attained.
Were they eIemp. here claimed. IL IS manifest
that TIE st , a bs po%,ps rsssd the General
nv The CONSTITUTION shold preserved full efficiency while
n % & sn n,'f @ never been Gsdei that State aon Of
property IS mpieiy prohibited The decree below affirmed
II the road be taxed be seized and sold M nonpayment
otat and O part, snd parees separated BY county OF
the corporation and establishing the line may be 'nbreI.ei
c.e was sp upcOus.uonal Interference with til, in,tnmrnaie
created by the National n err1s 90. iss Goees
wh Justice raey Hunt ented from the opinion Of The
Court but opinion Mr. Justice Swayne wrote an opinion
In The OF The Habor Commissioner Of California
from that STATE tae appellant through bis gran,or
between and Commercssts and claimed TOE ngh'
~. 90, @ ,Si e decree here sre the boiling
The e fronts property OF TIE city anl that s h was mol
conyeei ~ n G 70 ,S pss N. sppent IS no, 9o,.eei o
npanan rights Mi Justice Field delivered the opinion