, 1873-11-26
Verdict In the North State Street Con-
lemnation Cases.
> Tax Fighters Sustain
Another Defeat.
Heavy Judgmont Against tho
Douglas Heirs.


Suits for Personal Tninrv.-.Rnnkrnntov
1,,~
1iocteulnSs'
1rdoo 1.,oo.o,, IN. ,>oo, t,, H.. ,,,s+ v,o,.h
on,ooa5 l., ,rri- t,,o ~, os,,o - i,o,n roa Ia la
nsacssod ocn;nst ~, ci,v for ,vdcninr North
gtnto s.roat o f.or, r,,nnro .von,o h. scb,licr
ntroot rrlo ,,ort;,n r. In con;1cmncd I, about
+,yo,yo ,1oo,a ,nnr o,d vnrvinc from a1out 8D
y, 4n f.nt T., ..1t,, ot,n,o. n In ta,on from
H. o,st .;,o ~ sIotc atrcol md aomatjmc. from
~. aat ,a 80 ~ ~ ,nn,,o tlo stroot STRAIGHT
md md % ~ an nnyarvinr Width Tho yordict /, com
,.a =. n.,.Iaa,, e., 1.r r,o fo1,o r,oou ,r,1,1.
p14oeu ~ ~. .s.s. 4.a re' a.,aa
ing apont h1ty separate '.acs' VI PaieeS u i"no'
md about tiilrty-fiVo buildings, either private
houses or atoros, md also fow barnp, and two
hrevarioa. ono owned by Huck, whose dam
Dao"'t,' .ros aro oasossoa ~ ssI AN In othor
wy" ~. "'oesao" s,'.,', 0sA ~,
OF DoSlc' VINO auJuosea to po
ontitlod to $50, ,796'1o' Tho sum total Is S4lo.-
dso.G7, Tic land Is asseBacd at from about $B2
w.. .,,s,t -, Wv, ,,,,,,1, too ,,,o, ,n3 ;n,moai.
ano "'l'uai's s'' 'eAy 14u'4 sou aa'
atoly aftor tho rondlsson OF the eoFdot' entered
amoti0n for I'M, new ~. trial. AL, <,o,.
ruacc Vi,fiama VIVA engaged Yesterday 1norn-
eaaso ".s w.. sa usa -. a,ana,as n,s ~ ~
in6 ~ nealns ~ ~ aaoo.'o o.. Wv
junction granted IN ABOUT t"enty-avo caeca OF
tax.appeals from the Judgment OF tho County
Court, involving about oct, 600. Tho cases ayo
~, .,;1or roc;t,nr ~, ronil;tion of +,,o {,,d.-
-. H. ,.,t,x H.. ,..aa. sNNo %
mont py tne couatS, 'ae ponuehcy Oh
promo Court, and tho fcar that tho
ro,ntv co,1ector win ea11 nn1osa nm ;n,nnc.
49,, - ,.on,oa - raatr,;,, n,r, ~ ;,,,rct;orv
ton 10 ii",,oo ~ W .oo~A" n.4'4' "uu ~,
wero readily granted by Alaster in Chanecry
without nny notice to the city. Answers wero
flod by Mr, Tu}ey for tho city. and the case
como m IN n motion to DISSOLVE the Injunction.
M no .a, w. ~ tas se..r,s;n..,.. .,1oo<. tIat 49,
Constitution OF tho State guaranteed m appeal
from all lower courts to tho Supreme Court Of
Elm stnte. That tho provision Of Sec, 10 Of the
,ov ~ lho oath NJ March, 1874, m which fndc-
mont was oo.alnco' was unconstitutional ana
void, because 1t required propcrty-holder to
donosit with tho County Collector the amount Of
thc tayc, heforo tho appeal could bo nl'owod.
The record showed tut the uounty Judge ap-
proved tho Eonds which wore tled. Which WAS IN
tho ordinary form.
Tho Court declined to hear ANYTHING from tho
~ =: .., ,a a,ia ,,o ,r,,,,I .,1,,,jt +l,t ~,
csy ~ tes aua sa.a ~ "oau 1oat n'.t snIe suo
constitution ennranteea IN appoal' oat ho Ano"
OF no particular way in which it VAS guaran-
tccd. Tho Constitution was silont us to tbs
ton3a Tint yyhf1n fhe rrnrtirn hnd ham IN ninw
u, anes, e ~ % nc I han,, IN 1onh1o @ % t,o onnnnt
an appea. VI nili's ponu ~ aoap" 'i1o Auoun'
Of the Judgment no authority had boon pro"
duced and mono could be found. Tho Legisia-
turo could prescribe the terms, and in this oaso
thov Ind in,nosc5 tha condition ~ onositinc t,,c
.nos .au sao sooa'aoa y. , uopuss ."o
Money ma no saw ho ioaeon WY aucn IL"
could not DO made under tho cohss'tutaon.
Tho decision Of the Supreme Court which was
cited, III tic casc growing out Of tho same 1ude-
,.ont whore trov rcr,,ao1 ~ o,1ov , n,norse1ooo
noa' "A1t' 4,o,,4 10y Ao ;.t;t;a - 49, rs"st
Wns, ne tnouRht' an tnt'n1o'1oa u tuo eoat'
that tho limtntionain tho law as to snpersodess
being allowed would be also applicable as to an
appoal being granted, Tho Injunction was dla-
'"1 ras,s,ta,,.rt. t,,a,, .r,nvo1 ~, :, :, o,ro,,
Sr H. 1na;p;ae ~ ~ Ton-t N ~ ,rrnn,
t,t i tuo mi orer m ond a AMI, coud 10
tna1 ~ "nn x T & o44o ,.t ano "s,a to TX
ealvu ,,forqa t rracce hn3 hoou ~ rofta 1 M
1naai up fsr,., m NJ, os1ar ,;.ao,rn ~"
npPea. tao ~ t u "sas ~ GeI oror @ vi
!uJunttion ttit. H. mao NV AuI4 otuc1s uto