Clarksville weekly chronicle. (Clarksville, Tenn.) 1873-1890, 1873-01-04

RM Schale & wife VS. II Merritt, Adm r.
Robins & Posey VS. NJ A Foster and b NJ
r n waIthall VS. Ross Neblett, Admir-.
WalIan & Ringle VS. J y Duncan.
Maxwell. Saulpaw & co VS. NJ Y q Il II 90.
State of Tenn vs. r w Newell ct ais. 90
state of Tenn VS. Eliza Smith ct ais.
State of Tenn. VS. John 8. Majors, ct ais.
Martin & wife ct ais VS. G A Henry, Pres't
and Receiver.
NM Collier VS. T VI Orgain.
JSli2abeth Black ct ais vs. Jno Black ct ais.
] n Grundy VS. Jordan Neblett.
J r. Grundy VS. Jordan Neblett.
j = Golliday VS. IL 1ancey ana T. l.
TG Keats VS. d II and JD Duncan, . cases.
sam Watson vs. Z II w and Thomas ct
sam watson vs. W W Kirby and Seat.
Bayer VS. $ . W Brandon.
sam watson, Trustee, VS. j w and Will
liams. Adm'r'
SRP Johns vs. III Smith.
WR Poindcxter VS. J w Edwards
Henry I.vle vs. T ] Munford.
Henry Lyle VS. RI Munford ct ais.
sam Watson, Trustee, VS. ID Lanuon ana
An Fink VS. j II Johnson. -.-
II 4 Breeden VS. ] Rawls.
q Orgain vs. Sechler, Mccullough Co.
Trice q Madole VS. the Il III Turnpike Co.
ID Mari vs. Mrs II Ewing, Adm'X.
THIRD WEEK.
FIWvnn VS. \ Harrison et ais.
NJ r DeGrafenried VS. Geo ID Mimms.
II W King, EN VS. II Il ID II Duncan.
re Baker Sons & Co vS Smith 4 HutchingS
WA Quarles VS. G 9uarles. Admir-;
state of Tenn W T Fletcher ct ais, cases
state of Tenn vs. NJ Trotter ct ais.
ThoS Ogburn VsI j Thomas.
= A Caldwell VS. Ryan & Lankford.
Chas w Tyler VS. J. & r X Co.
Eta mS Co vs. ] Ply Whitfield ct ais.
Cobb, Catlett & Co vs. + = Gracey.
CaldwelI& Marable VS. DAILY, Lyle & Martin
w Johnston VS. First National Bank.
~
Morgan, O'Bryan u Co VS. Herndon
Collins.
NV Langston VS. w p Nichols.
DI smith vs. II Bowling.
NV Williamson W G : Daniel ct ais.
A Well W NJ c & l. u II Co.
Louis Mitchell VS. g II Harris.
A q Wilcox. Admir-, " J Iinehaugh, Admir-
j + Broaddus, Rec'r vS II l. King.
on Whitehead, Trustee, vs. j a Hamlet,
constable.
! I Buck VS. / & Y r L Co.
] q Robins VS. ] II Bell.
Z q c Rich vs. J X Bell.
[ Brockman & Bnnghurst vs. G II Norfeet.
T u West vs. \ q W Brandon.
! 4 pinine vs. Settle X Son.
I Watts & Bro vs. Dr Ben Thomas.
/ I, Bradley. Ag't, VS. : VI Lfgon, Admir-.
las RhodGS NS : M LigS1 70 aGl Noreet eases
las MaVety VS. r Il Moore. ,
II c Merritt vs. u II Duncan etals.
Herring, Hume & PettusVs Is Keesee ct ais
\ W Moss vs. Levi Chester.
Morris Smith vs. u NJ Buck.
W { Cooper vs. FC Harvey.
{ l. Wilcox Ns Nathaniel Parham.
ID Brown vs. T j watson and ] G Robins.
Emolinc Reid vs. Jas Reid.
4 g Dick vs. settle & Son
Rough and Ready Iron Works Co VS. o W
las clark for Bailey ys 5 NJ Ligon, Admir-.
= Kellogg VS 7 VI nntl and others.
Mrs = \ Hatcher ~ J~KInebaugh, Admir-.
Il. y CoolSSey vs. Robt Darnel.
lum kellogg vs. 4 bcninc.
John Rick ~ q & Rich
NJ smith W La r REQ.
j NJ Trotter VS J Y Martin.
siso CANT VS. Lucy Cant.
Judith Simms ". Il c & J. II Il Company.
FoURTH WEEK. ...
samu1 Watson, uustee VS. Cobb, Jarman
and Gordon.
samuel Watson, trustee VS. II 4 Fowlkes.
feIruStee. ei ais, ; cases.
Samuel Watson trustee vs. II 6 Merritt, adj
min istrator, ct ais.
samuel Watson. trustee vS : II Seat.
samuel Watson trustee. NS seat 4 krOpp.
SamI Watson trustee, " = NJ Isigon ct ais
sSam'l Watson truSice>vS Montgomery co.
)San'l Watson, trustee W. \ Howell and +
!. Williams.
samuel Watsdn. trustee, vs Montgomery
county. Ct ais.
samuel Watson, trustee. vs. D Landon,
ais. cases.
AM Watson trustee vs. Cooke. Cobb ct ais.
MI Watson trustee ve u Landon and
I II A Fowlkes.
s.ln I " at~pn trustee " nnrtcn & Cobb.
q sAnn Watson rs y NJ shelton. Ot ais.
San 7 Watson trustee vs. Cobb, Cooke and
tnortch.
ktna1 Watson trustee VS. Henry d Draue.
ami Watson VS shelton Il EdmoudSun.
keNgart College VSJ NJ * r NJ Robh.
lHAEarGeld " John EdmondSun.
lie johnson vs y r. Bagwell. Executor.
hck ~ Daniel. VS J. 4 y + r Company.
PIN keiy Vs I3 Read.
n HARRISON " klllchrew 4 Williamson
q ais.
Br0addus, agent vs. T " King.
4 Oliphant vs. ID & NJ \ Foster.
{ Kee.See vSSS Il Scat
AleS swift vS,' = Reachcr
fSexton vs. { B,PcafNter
avis lpcrand NS Morrison and Elder
BIZ sett vs. q R;ffaTrls.>
~ atnenter " A VI DVniel->
us,r Manufacturing 60. vs. W Howell.
L.RnSon vs. WitherS Roth, ct ais
rdldg Davis " NJ { 4 l. II It Com Iany
orr iSmith vs. W Buck.
q hilton 81 ais. NS Mrs l. n CaStpcr.
.Clcle vs. Keats 4 Duncan.
hltn Pctway vs l. & y X II Company&
mi iriffy vs. B * Gold, ct ais.
M. smith vs. J ! q y l. Thomas.
.geerritt. admir- vs.. X II Williams.
y tlostree VS. NJ - Bell.
pm all cases, which stand for trial at
=! anuary Term ofthe Court. which are
- treE mentioned herein, will be called.
ma dlslSed of during the 9Th week OF the