Shenandoah herald. [volume] (Woodstock, Va.) 1865-1974, 1873-08-14
LISTEN TO THE EVIDENCE:
COLUMBIA FussAoR, Aug. 9th, 1919.
Aess-s. Prescott, StoEeburner L Co..
Gentlemen,

Gentlemen,
| purchased last fall
o. You one ard baftons oil YOUR Shenandoah
Amnon ated super phosphate, also ere ton OF
the Maryland Fertilizer, used the came GUAM
tity OF each per acre, side BY side, (swo hu ndred
posnds), where used your fertilizer the heads
and straw were longer and the wheat better in
quality. l expect to SOW fert zers this fall and
shall use yours, for It is equal in any respect
to the Mary lane Fertilizer, and it is con sidera-
bly, cheaper. VIZ. TISINGEk.
RECToRToWN, Fauquier Co, Va,
July Is, 1873.
Messrs. P escott, Stonebu2ner 6 Co:
used IL tots Of your fertilizer last
Fall on ny wheat | used about l4O lbs.
per acre on very poo. land, that would not
have brought the seed that was sown on it
without Fertilizer but with the use of it,
/ raised as good wheat as WAS i'll the neigh
Do'hGod. and have al excellent stand of
clover and timothy on the land. | also
used two other fertilizers, one of which
acted very finely, and the other without
any evidence that it di,. any GOOD. I also
used It beside the patapsco, that one of nv
neighbors used, and my wheat was equal
20 his. or better, think the heads of lpy
wheat was the largest, aud upon The whole
it acts about as well as the best of te till
zerS, and it is some $40 cheaper per ton
v
5. Ii. HALEY, II. D.
I fully concur in he above statement.
| raised a fl le crop of wheat from the use
of your fertilizer, and have fine stard OF
grass. JNO. Fl. STEWART.
| used ole-half ton of your fertilizer on
my wheat last fall and an much pleased
w n the result, and also d GOOD stand of
&,rass from The use Of it.
WM. MUKRY.
used one ton of your fe '.ilize: Oh my
wheat last fail, by the side of he Patapsco
AID Turner'S. The result I am much
pleased with. l can see no difference be-
tween them yours being equally as good
as the s.. | AN confident without the use
OF fertiti er | would have made little Oh no
wneaI, end INV grass did we'll
L. TEMPLEMAN.
Messrs. 2.'escott, Stonebu,aer j. Co..
We have used your phosphate, and it has
given elti,e sat siaciion.
JOS. f. GOCHE NoUc,
July Z, 1873. D. II. GOCHENOUR.
hereby certify that used half ton of
the Shenandoah Am non,ated Sune nhos-
phate, last lall upon oae-half of five ace
lot, near WobdstocE. Upoa the other
half OF the same lot, a I'D rather the better
part OF it ia quality of soil, used another
phosphate of high cha -acter, in equal
quantity. The result has been very salts
factory, indicating the decided supe 10 ity
of the 20 'mer over The later. The sand
of wheat was much better upon the part
of the lot upon which the former was used
Although The d~'lling was not good, l be-
lieve shall make IS bushels to the acre
upon that half of The lot. IL MIGHT have
easily bee.l increased 20 20 BY prorer dr;l-
ling. MOSES WALTON,
Woodstock. Va, July 2, 1878.
used q ton of the Shenandoah Phos-
plate last fall. The wheat where l used
it turned out verv well. r'he head were
lal re and well filed les TED it by dill
ing on land Oh like quality beside another
fe 't.'izer, which cost upwards of
500 per ION, and | an satisfied the Edn-
burg ma de better wheat. | will use 1t e.
clusively the conf ~ lall on my wheat
H. &. ALLEN.
Woodstock, Va, July 2, 1873.
l hereby certify that used the Sheaan-
doah Phosphate last fall on :, portion of
my crop OF wheat. Ny crop OF wheat |
consider ve.v good, and The stand OF clo-
yer is yelv fine. Where | used no tertili-
ger nv wheat was vefr Indifferent.
l.. b. WHISSEN.
Edinburg, Va. July 3, 1878.
PRESCOTT, STO NEsURNER & CO,
EDISBURG, VA.
.riU 1T nnt