New-York tribune., 1873-01-25

bly, bad reference 10 that trsusachop chat ~ ~ WA
sfter that oonld not have any rcier nee 70 ~ tnss
h nst ~, w and 20 40 og say of don't
undertake 20 Judge what has been in MI AmeSs mind aa
O. You think the amount Of money YOU received from
Mr.. Amos 10 all round si.OooI A. IL was round
81 900 that s what believe had from him, and have
stated that received II from him dihesSnt
sions and now think received the amounts Ou two
% Can Won state in reference 10 the division OF tina
amount, to how much you received At one tpe ana
AMOUNTS received were 500 and $500
O. Can you state which amount you received first
The CHAIRMAN inquired Of MT. Ames whether be fe-
sired to further examine Mr.. Kelley Dir. Ames hero
handed 70 Mr. Kelley what seemed to DO written
memorandum.
cRoss-EkAMISRD by Mr.. AsEs.
Mr. KelIey-Mr Ames asks this paper whethes
he shall put certain questions 20 It IL not for mo 20
say what he shall OF shall not ask.
Mr. Ames-You have made 1t very important for ms TO
ask yoa further questions have made my testimony
heretofOre as favorable 10 you as could now ask
you whether have not come TO me repeatedly often
and wanted TO know when YOU should get any moro
dividends on that stock A. No, Sir.
rec,DoS an yonr stockf A. did not understand IT,
q. Did you give me sny receipt or '0ucn0r lot 'HA'
O. Did you for the s32e A. think not, nor for tno
800 received previously -. -. q, ,.,o for a,
MT AInesmfes yo1 @ Gio ,S ygu II OF before this trans
action you do recOllect any OF these
A
tnet as stated the other day, Of going TO Mr. AInes
after his failure and expressing TO nm my iegret va.
was "A, much embarrassed "a had been before anu ny
regret that was unable return him that o ana oi
his saying that 1900 would not anect nm hlu9n Ia
although they had squeezed him pretty tSn 10 Inous
he would not be seriously injured. .,-, q,
q. You say now that you recollect no cohVots"evn IN
more dividends on that stockl A. In such
recoect asking you in regard to your personal ''sc
as how they were coming on
@. You have no recollection, then OF asAlhg me "nes
vol, were TO get other dividends that sOckt NO.
Dir. in npafar To
o. What was SAID when you asked me for $780, A
Upon my word can't tell; 1 had asked You lttl.
while before to loan me $1,000 and you gave me ma,
you han about you and think next day OF withn
days 1oa & SS a. 5o ts say 500 say
Sir. Ames-I do not know that 1t is at al mportant
on that stock and told you that there had been diy
dends that they tied up with the McComb 'm]
TESTIMONY OF MR.. AMEs CONTINUED.
BY the Chairrnan-Let ask you question in regard
to your interrogatores Mr. Kelley; they seem 70 I'M
ply that he called you from time to time to know #
there were more dividends on his Credit Mobier sockt
A. Yes, Sir, he did
O. At what time that was it after the b2o was
paidi A. Yes. Sir.
O. subsequently to that date you cay SIR Kelley came
70 you and these inquiries A. He did; yes sir
@ And more than you sayi A. Yes, sir; on one
Of occasions. when he asked told him there
was dividend declared and let him $50, which
| considered account OF the DIVIDEND and TOOK from
hm note, voucher or receipt.
q. You kept memorandum OF iti A. Yes. Sir
O. The 1929 you let him have the balance due him
after paying for the Credit MObler stock and you say
that was paid by check on the Sergcant-atArmsf A
Yes Sir. payable to A" w. ID. K" or bearer
o. Was that the only check you gave him on the Ser
geant-atArms A. think it was.
O. The other payments directly to him IN money!
A. I think so II may be By check on some bank don't
know what bank and don't know whether on some
bank or ON the Sergeant-atArms; have no recOnec-
tOn.
O. When he called you to know II there were mors
dividends stock did tell him there were dyldeDds
on the Union Pacific Railroad stock. &c A. Yes, sir
presume the they were not turned over u
him was in consequences OF this suit.
O. From your statement Mr.. Kelley must have under
he the of the stock and entitled 10
dividends 10 A. He considered II at least pro.
sume he did heard anything TO the contrary
until the other day. had always considered it as his
stock
O How recently do you think you had any converse.
tOn with Mr. Kelley this subject before the present
session. A. At every session since and NUMBER Oi
ne has asked when that thing was going 70 ne
settled aud when could get our dividends
O. He knew then, from your statement that you were
holding Union Pacific Railroad stock for mint
A. presume / have no reason 10 think he did not
@. Did you tell him sol A. told him so when mada
the first statement, spd be knew that subsequent dIV
dends made.
o. When he spoke to You about dividends did you tell
him there had been stock dividends upon the Credit
MObier stockf A. Yes, Sir; the stock dividends were
within few months OF that first transaction, when
paid him the 1929.
BY Mr. Merrick-The payment OF the s329 before
the s75Of A. Yes, Sir; the $3.50 september after
card