New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-02-05

from Fourth District Court. Insur.
aance case, Judgment affirmed.
So a y rel. A. & L. Cheval rs. Judge %
tho Eifrh District Court, parish OF Orleans.
This REALTORS ask for a writ OK mandamus
- comnel the Judge of the Filth District
Court to grant an appeal from a Judgment
dissoIving an Injunction sued gu! ~ lhem
m restrain the execution OF d judgment
aga;nst themselves. The answer OF the
"a 90 i IN the effect that the matter IN dis
mite dos not exceed $500, and, therefore,
no anpeaa lies. 1t appears that jungment,
nrincipal, interest and costs exceeu mat
sum therefore it is ordered that the hal
dauus issued herein be made ~peremptoTy,
BY MR.. JUSTICE WHY.
? LIVINGSTON We. Carondelct GanaS ans
Savigati0n Company.-9ppeal from the
Eighth District Court. Suit soT PROSE-
e;nHal services. Judgment affirmed, iIS Favor
Of plaintiff, with costs and ten see seuS
damages for frivolous appeal
State of Louisiana. eX rel Attorney TeN
ar,I .. al VS.. Timothy DOhertY.- Appeal
tr"m tbe Eighth District Court. Suit under
+ho intrnsion act. and involving the right Of
+bo Governor TO remove defendant and an.
nniut J. l.. Tharp. Verdict for defendant
rendered on a Trial by jury. The defend
an+ was removed by the Governor under
aac+ion 1873 of the Revised Statutes, which
section invests the Governor with Glscce-
tionary power in cases OF neglect OF duty.
The grant of power TO the executive 10 re-
n,nve an officer for a certain cause, implies
aI+horitv to Judge OF the existence of that
cause. Ordered that Judgment appealed
from be annulIed, and judgment rendered
for p"laintiff requiring defendant to restore
70 nlaintitt all books and property apptC-
tanning to the office, u that defendAn5
nav costs of both courts.
The court adjourned untA ten O'CLOCK on
Monday next.
Superior District Court.
State cx rel Louisiana Levee Company
vs. Charles Clinton, Auditor.-IhI5 Is an
publication for a mandamus TO compel the
issuance of a warrant upon inc treasurer
5,r +he pavment to relatOr OF SI3,OUO. the
amount of funds now II hahoS OF me
Treasurer Of the State, accrulnS from the
two mills tax in favor Of the leVte construc.
ton fund, and the two-tenth per cent tax
in favor of the leYee repair tund' Man
damus made peremptory.
State ex rel. CHARLES Clinton, Auditor,
and A. Dubuclet, Treasurer.-Ihe lnJunc'
ton heretofore issued i'll this case Is SO ti7
modified as to except the DonGs ho4u DY
the New Orleans, Mobile ard Texas rail.
road and by George A. Sheridan.
Second District Court.
The SUGGESTIONS of Emily Aedora RoOln.
son. Henry Menner, ST., Mr.. and Mrs.
George Helberger, Edwin D. Hubbell, Car
cline floetz and G. A. S~pitzmiller have been
opened in this court.
sixth District Court.
In the suit Of +. +. King VS.. J. +. Diet
rich, in which the plaintiff claims $4,000
for illegal arrest and false imprisonment,
Judge Saucer, considering the law and the
.-;Jlnoo tn ha in favor at the DidlUtl1
awarded $1,000.
In the suit of Block s. Britton rs. Low &
Ludwirsen. the court rendered a decision IN
favor Of plaintiff, against he members of
the firm OF Low & Ludwigsen, il liquida-
ton. for the sum of Sl772 %. with Interests
and costs.
In the case of Hernsheim & Bro. vs.
+. Gardens, Louis A. Welton ct ais, the
court decided in favor OF plaintiffs.