The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1873-01-14
iCommun'cater,.i
ro,crehurs Rai,rond EonPa"s-sss
Record.

, r 900
RICHMOND. Il'H 'a"ua'! io''
lsga synonymous Commuh'cat'oh ose' sue
...,a,urr & " "ton>Nhdanon'S'! III thc D.S
.[.l e .',r "th instant, shc writer "ocshes
:, ,thon' s.gs n3ticn every WoFa OF the
-....,ia- ;a3ta -cHHh IN recent reply oi inc
f....h h,i; Of The hlthh"no' fedeFi'hS'"iS
..i r,'n,o,c h3jir"%d Company 10 p!o-
.... p;irr oi Nr. h'Nhch h"S'a"o, y, it
,..,..r-.} wt'iHh ">H'''> "' li''ih'> ,i'' "a.
T.,r..@T- "iiir"A" was ho>'',c ~" 'nso"1n
gnarru.cH through l"eiH,"I%' "'l" -.
.-.ur.,r- NJ surprise TO liiio 10" Sf'a'iH
E.. waters ln'"'Ft "f INC ''.se s'',,''''n'' ',,
U.s.. Al informant had ml>icd hm lMr. no
..,pn..
rciu.m,.,N that informant. propose to
,-gua p, l;Aluc,ilcmhlc proofs every
a1.I o.! that paragraph
aH3ar - ;>o', says Nil ROBINSON.
ol, f.. rNi>i2d not only the broken INK OF
...,3a" miles III Washington. bnt also the
,....aer ri any railroad connections through
...o'.,, oi Petersburg and Richmond Gh1
.. ......-.ts,.s uasrlhinqHfSS Of Me Peters,
yug..g.; C,npa,,u 10 foI7rard t1eightS
,-....,...,,; y07,j< uOy1h ri Peferstara-
~. E,r.,,.g-luadr il necessary for pro-
....~. a.. ,I,rrI,3n;> III tae Calulinas to pay
.ta~l,tfiH - llrftIi!it> ti dStNtS III e
,,..,ur. il order 10 get their freight for
u...,i .irn - iieMnond. TO remove
,-.>. olr>tru,;!o1> 10 commerce as fur rs
,t.en..',n authority 10 construct connecting
...ui, Ntlrt-l Richmond and Petersburg
g.. in f>&,. >1U.At aud obtained from the
stature. j..,: IN 'ic P.l.rSi,rG hdi!roa6
.... ...... i,lil bN ihe presidents Of the Rich
ST.. ..., yad Petersburg and Richmond, Fred
,...rwrd contest with the senator from
J ,g,LiiI-. representing, 1t is believed, the
.r, ma Wisacs Of tie Petersburg Rail-
l.al tanpiny.'
Eogrtr;npi Is here made by "Cousolda-
tluaiL. 10 .;cny lue existence prior to 1867
rg tga ',rukcn links If railroad transDoria-
'n IN Petersburg, Richmond. and Wash
ION. which. prior to lSG.t, alone obviously
.>:!,titciar mYle,c barrier 10 any through
=. 1t Transportation over the Richmond,
s-t-gic& :,urI and Potomac railroad be-
-u.,,u the ruolints or Petersburg and cities
...rlA al Richmond. Nor is i! denied that
-. Ur,> of Assembly authorizing the con-
r'.JuE railroads through Richmond and
fiD,uuI@ "WCre sought ana 0ttdtned, no.
' -" Petersburg Railroad Company, but by
i@,.ijrni> pi IN" Richmond aud Peters.
.r- JWd he Richmond. Fredericksburg
,t No'onac NGitrnaji Companies but the
.r.uG j u9,lc 20 show that "thc Peters.
tae-. l,liuuaa CnHl,HUy Was only mot hos.
.. ' "'o& through connection by official
r..' .' a1>--'. =. The unnc'ul REPORTS OF Mr..
=, -a,arJ. p.r,i}cut ii that COMPANY
81 .9 .al r-i 1861.
u y. ..-tnI t'i"sc lfpolt>--that Ok lSGti---
r:. ,a".uj lin,,Iv SI,c0IS 0rjr0rtnqiy of
"a:
.,r;.mi#at r,trs'tuG would consent 10 al
I a... ".a. 3,s.r ,roy.r rcst,lchons.' TO
n t..,..p. nnr...lr,l road thruIl..lI Richmond M
..,.,.: .:,...., w2- mad tv t:;s citizens. But 10
;... t:l.l-y Petersburg Dir. Sanford then
la.,2 t:,t II Nlrt.ttt and excited opposition
l.t, ttg3aii.d amaus the citizens ot Peters
t..r4. via. IL was informed hv tormer
lr,aiirnt c,t;lon Of F.trr,!,!rr' had held
,n,..i. ,u,r;iu-s - protest artlnS, such a
,.ul.r,DE. Icncr Nr. >,n;nrG's ditl;llcut
....rgp. .,,,li,.o,. 10: to the L.p$fut,1,r. hut
F., hi -iur,iiri,lri,>, Il shat his Indictment;
.iroy.l, hu, what liz knew WAS 50 strenu-
,.,.,y ulao.rl hc the ritiypu. and ,o,,n
,.n1ri, 81 Petersburg. III, ru,.s,,a.a,.,.y con.
.,.,,,. g.nDr.t; Gr' IT,, S!,,... a. i;S rl,,.
.4.gL ,nc 81 thee citizens and >ynri;hol;i-
amd o8s of Il coanayj.,,.pj ta.. t,,r,. cana.
II
..,., t,;,g.cfig; r.,0gS h,rny,, tbr I.o,Sjr-
..., declared to the Coinuittcc on Hoads las
! W,:> to-day reminded i,y q gentleman then
t..,ra'i ti'a, " every mail. woman, and child
81. Petersburg Was opposed to unv such
voa!.r,l0n.'
hH'clyn this rtr4 modct recommendation
81 tir. >Inlold was made 10 meeting of his
,tl,!l;"rs held March hcen;y-h7st, lSGG---
,t,y IB. l,tll -,
'c-l.it'Hrr. where :hcy had been presented.
70 a.. - H." Petersburg Railroad Cunpanv,"
'", ~ aHy one representing it, but br the
,'s;d'iit~ OF The Richmond, Fredericksburg
81 i@i"ln3c and Richmond aud Petersburg
".'i'"'H t"'GlH'ni@>, is carly as the 10th Of
oIi 1876. more than two months prior
.'' ". ,1ntorUs report to his stockholders,
''"' n'", iiAt ,iat" violently opposed hy the
.,I.o,i,,@ >,y. Gs hi. r,nrt ntu ~ ur S"n Sam
,.r,. "wa> ore 9,oy bcfo,G the entcrnliSinr
.r>glru;> OF the two northern lines sought
~ obtained aa;!iority,'" II is true this
',n.t /, daied ,Iau;,aly |, 1866, that being
end oi The con.;unv's fiscal wear. But it
"c!i kunWn to alE railroad officers that it
,.+s or more iui.1., for want Of the annual
.',oGmt, and documents OF tie company,
a!tA could not be earlier furnished to him.
>sr:! Il The accuracy OF Consoidationist'
y 20 the "},ot0riou3 ua,cliiinqness of The
i''"ys5lrg RuirVud CJtupd,.y 10 for,card
''i},tS og,r VtrWnQ roads nor,h Of Peters,
t.s. tt.a n l:rqln.a," | might get the
''~'uIuny oi vrry many of the most respect-
,, merchants riid n.cl,a,ljcs of Richmond
a1l Petersburg, as we'll us of many officers
~ |Tgjnia railroads north OF Petersburg;
'2; Mi:! content lnyScli for the present viii Ii
-" following:
'.l thc 2ih Instant addressed the follow
~ :@tj'r to Mr. sanford, and a similar one