New-York tribune., 1873-01-30

Sd not have had the idea 90 and ask his with
lending himself % nvSence a. 1eiS a ne e"ad not ret his
sst due without committing ertlne' IheIe is no,
MO.u c, ~ leader in these crimes he certainly was
Wang partlcipstor Anxious as he was TO exeulPate
h%S 9sSfy to Nf tell SRSety where i was that
monstrated. whom he demonstrated ana what wotos
,nsde use OF when he remonsr rated. He would nave
tvsn it 10 YOU with dramatic effect He was proecea
by the FIRST law officer of the state in whose onSe ne
made his hdingplace, before he was made use OF as
witness in the Hall case. The seven nls tns' NJ
made out entirely aud absolutely false There
Rnt' ~ rentemen Mr. Tweed must be IN some way
Xicted The prosecution saw necessity OF that, and
Garvey it, aud by whom could they estannsn Una. M
only in the whole island who could do It, GarVsy,
course, felt very happy He had his NSo1oS 10 DIS
Sey lie had the 10000 that Tweed did not pay him.
He not to be disturbed No harm was 70 come o 70
stand 10 connect Tweed with these frauds. They go
back to the year 1851 Now think there d y no Ser h
tween Watson and Tweed or Ingersol ana dTeeu. OK
that time he had some work to do tSr the
county that he added IL per cent TO hs DBL e anu % aSa
use of one singular expression: After did the worE
went to Mr.. Tweed and asked him how should make
corrupt bargain when he undertook TO do the work
Tweed according to his story dd not suggest A. III cO %as
neotion bet ween Tweed and Woodward. and did u in
@ SeS and Ss q a tas O fS him S Do @ Ss
business with Woodward, and he did after that Taking
Weed But It has not been shown that he was pubic
officer at that time The story altogether an improe-
which in the end you viii be bound 70 disbelieve.
THE FIFTEEN PER CENT.
I may as well consider another branch Of the case,
and that is the improbabity Of Garvey's statement
with regard 90 his Is per cent We have handed him
bills Of 1861 ~ which he said he had added Is per cent
and said Now show to this jury how this is per cent
was added" Was not TINT fart Did not that afford
MIN the very opportunity that he would have seized
tusion: So1 reeolIect how he failed 10 answer Then
my associate called his attention to particular items
II added to this item =" II cannot tel' "Tell US in
some way how this 10 per cent came into the PILL de
except the bare and naked statement Of that man that
be aided the Is Per cent and that nt0 tne M
which the Is per cent was added II was not ADDED 70
of materal-he would say it was ADDED there The
footing up was correct; it was not there. How then
son than that. You must throw out this evidence.
order 70 him With the the aTs s he Ss aI So1 ne
amounted he did not say how much but TO large
Secept for the whole amount Tweed did not give him
any money but he afterward got 1t out or the county
TO bill. Here is the receipted bin which was given
10 Mr.. Tweed When this was spoken Of while he was
5 eis My friend asked him what 1t was that he was
diving for, and he pulled out a memorandum, he
wanted TO convince you that that memorandum cor
roborated his testimony. Let us see what evidence
his drst bin, but did not make it even ng-
ures because IL would not look busness-lile. 1t
and 6oSnty Of Ne% YORK He says that that paper
first and then, in order 10 reduce it down
% about 10000 he made this one out and eoped ~ ron
that He sand this was part OF the same sheet OF paper
which the original made out DE was willing TO
10 every corroboratng circumstance IN 0rier 10
satisfy you. What most particularly WISH 70 call your
attention TO is this: This paper he said he put In
drawer left there during his absence in Eu-
rope. gwen 10 his brother 10 keep do not know
had receipted Tweeds bill and received his money from
the county But he kept IT, and was able % to take IT out
from Europe and began TO prepare for this case he got
out this bin
THR BLANK CERTIFICATES.
You recollect that Garvey said one occasion he
over TO Mr.. Tweeds Office IN company with Wood
ward who took with him roll OF certificates OF audit
which he knew were blank. That was to show Tweeds
connection with the transaction He must testify TO
something showing Tweed's participation Was he ad,
mltted 10 Tweeds presenoei He did MT see Tweed on
that occasion at all Woodward said TO him. 1Ou Doys
w s 3S & %ny t tSS.y fraud. TYfa af psS s Se
evidence would eond 60 sbo hon why ie tbat
facet Why 1t Woodward went in TO get the certh,
Gates sguedi Why II Garvey's story was true should
made out the bills. Garvey collected the bills
shonid not Caryey and Tweed meet and understand
each otheri You will perceive the story IS inconsistent
right or wrong or may he presumed TO have known.
he the presence OF Tweed, we VIII say with one
of the bills in his pocket. ana assured HIM he ad exam
nea d e SDIs &C., am s w h, "a correcf The inference is
nof aid i'm the ACCOMPLISHMENT OF the purpose. The
learned iudces ADMITTED this evidence because Garvey
audit that day. Yet IN testying To that he had or
gotten that he had already testified tIat he never go
ANY money the same day.
Well ycu say that Mr.. Tweed had part OF the pro
oeeds OF these fraudulent bills ana tley prove IL Dy
Garvcy. Everything IS proved by Garyey. Ahd tley
ssy money was put TO I~eeds ered oy MocIwadI t anu
the county II Would seem most extraordinary n thls
connection between Woodward and Garvey and Tweed
up 10 that hour But the evidence is entirely lnsum
Davidson Keyser, aud there s 40 satisfactory proof
that he had anything TO DO WITH GSIYey hASe, % 1we9 S
There Is evidence that he directed deposits
10 oC maui - nls tovv snv connection with
Tweed whatever. Now you are asked 10 believe thdt
Fmlty kuowiodge his part Of the source from which
these credits came, and adjudge hm gulty Ql crime
You cannot presume quit, except the facts
force the presumption on your minds, % r1sd, dhSIe
may nave oee9 s IN maney m 70 Tweeds credit
They say that 100000 was sent by John Garyey to
purposes let Us see where the prosecution win fetch
up when that IS carried out to It's lenmae results IN
Tweed was afraid of investigating committee from
legislature. You recoeet the words be imputed to
have got TO pat up aud hep buy them" Ihat |as deal
uoctiou-whO was left IN the antc-rooin
GARvEY's SHAME
Mr. Fullerton, continuing his address when the Court
reassemDed recess said he should now proceed TO
impeach the testimony OF Andrew j. Garvey. You Will
Teeoect that we established that ne had an lhterNe"
with the Attorney General, and in the course OF his
Xamin he used this Significant conclusive
language, have spoken TO the AttorDey-Gen-
eral In my life single syllable one way or the othei
he forced. however before going on the stand TO
sy in answer e The question: sd you RsrSSRa %hsn m
A. The nrst time Mr. Peokham was early IN Feb
rnary in Gen. BaTlOWs house" Then called Mr.
PEE khan to take stand and proved by him that lie
went 10 the Generals house. not having made
an anpoiptment with Garvey, but with the Attorney
General himself The Attorney General told him that
GaTyey would meet him tbat night Ibey met anu nau
,fFtfar n