New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1873-12-16
NEW ORLEANS REPUBLICAN, TUESDAY DECEMBER Is 1873
otions, and no irregularity appears il

=
| ceptlons, ana no frregularlty appears II
the record. Judgment affirmed.
No. 4ol3. Rosette e. St0rrs, appellant, We
Edward thompson. ct al, from Fourtl
District Court OF Orieans.-flalntlhs IN
junction was GlssOlved on the lusnmclenc.
OF the surety, vino admitted on the stant
that he was not worth the amount OF his
BOND Judgment affirmed.
No 3OO3 A. e. Senouvion vs Rebecca A
| Mchnlgnt ct ais, appeliant.-from SIKH
| District Conrt OF Orleans. Plalntln obtained
| Judgment Tor SS9o4 40 and propounded Ia
| telr' tons to William =. Harrison as gar
nlsht: who answered each IN the negative
| fiaintiH took rule to snow cause why
| Judgment should Lot De rendered agalns
| hlm. alleging bis answers TO De false anc
| fraudulent. he excepted that oelDg a new
| suit 1t could not be tried IN vacation ano
was oVerruled. lie then applled 1or Jury
1uta condemino him to nav $1,000 Accord
ing to Hernandez g. Jane. % A.'4s3 the ex
ception should have been maintained
Judgment reversed.
No. 4i07. A. w. Walker, appellant. vs..
Etienne Villavasso ct als.-From Second
Judicial District Court. Injunction which
was referred to in "a A, 23, as not justified
by the grounds alleged. Further examina-
ton has confirmed that opinion. Since
1861 plaintiff has batfied defendants at
tempt TO execute An ordinary writ OF seizure
and sale. This 10 his fourth injunction, and
was granted by the parish judge in the alb
sence of the district .judge, who dissolved
it, sitting in chambers, without notice to
plaintiff. This ex parte order was irregular,
but it is not necessary to remand the case
mand of payment, which should have been
made in ,ha first applipstion. that rha a ii :
vertisernent OF sale is in the name of three
different parties, which is without force;
that the sale should be at the place Of
seizure, and not at the courthouse &c. z.
6boj Is not sufficient, as the plaintiff did not
request 1t, and others are overruled. The
sale must proceed under the order seizure
and sale. The court hopes the officers W Ill
SO proceed as to avoid any pretext for
further scandalous proceedings. Judgment
affirmed with costs.
NV r,,sr,c, uv,v
aoco
NO; ~Soo' ANTONIO Dlrhalh vs.. home Mu-
.uai Insurance. o"inpahJ, aFPri,dht.-frnh
seventh district Courc Oh Orledns: De-
remnants appeai foil JuuSineht vi Hooo oo,
ana plalntiH JOINS IN , inc appeal mat the
amount may oe iIade @'9i IiaintlH was
III partnership WIN 'osePh II. iapohy' VINO
retired -FOUR months oeiore NE nfe. DIT,
man assumed abilities a. OF S'i. 90 W, agreed
10 pay rent anu Iaoohy ~'-o, e. III casn,
anu pa!ance IN thirty Gays. i-e percy IS
not assigna ole except py consent OF onth
parties. Iouio enc or Ine lhsuleo transfer
10 MS partner IL iaoohy hau dled ana
oepuea'ueu o!o poii'y " us '"i'her "ou!u
IL IL nave inaoe 1t Volo we hnu nolning III
me Instrument 10 cohciude that tIe plaihtln
Iorie ed 20 ms pohcF: 10 oarp., cls; o. N
T., 5uo, 10 a. l., ~, az; me plalntin mas Ger
o1'nlN N"s.alneu 'he Aoss' JUG uioh' alnehu-
cd ana anrme6;
No. 900: u. M: Ike vs.. .: - DeLah, al-
peliah'. ron fi!Un b'st-lct oourC vi W
leans. Only questions Oh 1act are involved
anu we onlnk tne amount hAea ny tne jury
vas correct aooinS lh'9res. d. I'VE per cent
nnglnen6 amenuea ana aihiineu.
No. 1913. State OF Louisiana VS.. II; Ii:
IdSe, ppeliant.-Doienuah'' eonvlcteo .,
iliahsiausn 'et' W." vas sentenced 10 Two years
luiptlsohW en'. ne err, axe no assignments
" eIloIs or otleis niea' anu ~ eilo a. Ioun"
III eAaiii nm .ne recorI' 1uog llehI anir'ieu
y: NO. AGA. oia'e VI LouislSna W. henry
iosG re- ,n.m a.
DISTRICT. me uelel1anU was COW icteu u
perjury anu 1 Sen'eneau 10 I'VE years III peii-
.ehtialy. me inoieCuleht Is la:ally ueiec-
tiHe' III 10Y ehafslug tne QUESTION lalseiy
d, vas III ~ iai' im 10y 'eI'ius Aoi Va
the substance Vi the chehse' ana IA nor
chars'ng oeienHant Tlliluily haae nath'
Areh. Ileau. =" Judgment @phuiieo anu
lnHlctne zen, SET aslae. r
40. 4o2i. Caro!ihH EleAaros0h, aPrei-
iant' We. y: N. ohe'@ n eI az TIT run o.A.u
DistrieG oouIe Oh Orieahs. re sulo OF
Plaihlln 10 81 '1eiue lue .auJ uui' f VI
properly ana 10 enjoin deiehoan,s from as
posing Oh IL was discussed. me oefehse
nloNe ~ set asiuo 'ht aPpc%i ooIauso tn ne
surety 10 nop Joineu' oooui vs., o,ie'' 10y ~
n ~, AFesho vs.: oonhston' - a., 4o0'
Ia Inc case az oat IS oinereht from THESE:
mere the suiI was uisih'Sseo lot ho CAUSE Oh
ac'iol. h'snI Oh actIoh ~, dor oalhasts was
reset |eu " oelenuanV. ut RE-, was no jug
menu as"ihsO lue suietA' ihe ueci,,oh Vi
Gue couf' eau no' aheo' ti-e surety holion
oelieu' ooor
NO ooo'. D. ~ aShaIu vs.. ooGf ~
AtWaler eI ais.-f rom oiAth DiStfiG1 Gourt
vi VI CFieShs. o ooc "a 81 AtWa sueu dcharu
q 70, io1 Sia ,o3o W. OeiehodhI aiitgt u d
u ,ec, Vi qlI,''o anu pay lueh. May -,
LOU U! saiD " ,6 oo oah pau 'dSiou o'
puoHc act lot sio,ooo ana balance oy note
sihce paul. aoLhi'S advances since pu6
c - pay nenC ny sums r@etlVea IRON
Oaiiioi nia Ioi mn Ny 0lSh'l Ella o@ e, VI
cct.oi; crop Vi roo, amounting 10 *o'Vo'
dnu ovoo sachS u seeu. AtWater suppl
lhentdi Pe,ition aonilts rfs4uctlon Vi t,ie
neuG 10 elo'2'V 10; ine snerili sei2en 'h,
property VI o. u Iachafu' ~ se'nS IIesed
ne was aooHC ~ iea1o 'ne o'd~ 80 ne con-
p. pioini7eu No'enloef 90, iooo, nA.hs
L u, amount aI @-'ooo, lhoiuu.nS
~ ueulahus. .uin'ug o ,non on me
piopeftS W A1"aVoi, eAoept iooo ous .i, u
oo- 80 >ou W poy 'iio iohl. AZ uo-
naIis |0Io ~ 10 e".iS.ieu' SUI pius W 70 70
aohaiu diiu iionl VI 'anS uenolV ~ 'oc go
yohiesSeo W MS attorney. FepIuafJ' loo''
a.halu orouSne sulD " 20 an nno the COLI
'foin'se' anu u r9co,er S@o'Uoo' atltgilg IL
ha9e III error auu through Ifauu; una! oe-
enuah'' hAse o'ttcuarSeu MN, hoo gwen
;eItaln GREATS, tnat ne was inducec 10 pe-
leye me 'rea lof the Live YAK plantation
l "a noe oeel accepted, etc. ne aleg ;a