, 1873-03-09

for comparison with similar tAniencles
Of population and prices nest OF ground IN
so' points T.. s nat While the trade Of New
{orK has increased enormously, the greater part
OF those who have been drawn there to partici-
pate IN it have boen driven to the remote sub
urba, beyond the northern area" mentioned by
Mr. Martin. OF which, as above stated, four-ffths
Is still vacant. The point, however is that, not
&ithatendng this ''nocthern area p" of near
suburban property has boen skipped over by
population, ii has increased more IN value than
any other. While the southern area, thickly
built up into one vast hive of trade has only in
creased in value 70 per cent in twelve years, the
northern urea, still four-ffths vacant, like the
belt Of property mile wido next outside the old
city limits Of Chicago, has increased 500 per cent
In regard to the remotcr suburban districts,
Mr. Martins statistics arc less compact and avail
ehle, but they allow that, Notwithstanding tho
grcater portion OF the increase OF population
hes been driven to these districts for residence,
the increase in value Of the real estate does not
compare with that Of the near suburban district
In what he calls the t'northern area" The dis
tict in Chicago which would nearly
correspond to the "southern area "
Western avenue On the west, Northern avenue
On the north, and, say, Thirty-hfth street on tho
south. Assuming that the experience OF real
estate values in Chicago will result like that of
New York, it leads to the conclusion that toe
Rnd not more than, say, three milea beyond
them, Will increase in value eeyen times as fast,
"a the average value Of the ground insida the
streets mentioned. In the romoter suburban
anything like the same ratio Of increaae OF
vnlues- In O few spots where attractive Rubut-
ban towns will be built thare will 'be q
large increase Of values, but, Judging BY Ale ex-
as IN the near suburban diatricta..bet 6een, say,
three aud six or seven miles distant from the
bua;reBs centre.
suMnAny FOR THE vEEs.
The following ia the total amount of city
week ending Saturday, March 8 City prop
erty-Numbor Of sales, Ito; consideration.
ss57,s76. North Of city linits-Nunber Of
snles, consideration, $500. South Of city
e5s,12o. West Of city limizts-Number Of sales,
10; consideration. s35o, $50 Total sales. 203.
Total consideration, 51,255, ,046.
SATURDAYS THAsEFERs.
The following instrumental we're fled for reo-
urd on Saturday. March g.:
c1rE PROPERTY.
81 osPaSs1es I st ~ cor ce pssnaines st. 1oox11'
ea,su saf s Of Of Loo,s on
23 consideration. 81 ,2s7.
~ hus5ss s. Of caeag9 Lot 3d. dated Feb
t5est Randolph St 80 r. Of Green st. I, to11oo #,
a.ts: ,;: OK II, ls52 consideration, $3.50
,sstn s1n5 na %rsRg st Is # to alley dated
Mss sansaeTsaSa 81 @sahS & # to alley dated
100 It dsted Doc 10, 1ss2 20 consideration. sso6.
Wilcox ct, l53 o-10 It Of Cahfoznia ay, +, 25u24
IT, easse sEee It 5 Il 81 sapSa s2
dated March !; constellation, 1850.
Nora av 2oo # Of Hirseh 1t, i, 25r1ee IT, dated
March s; consideration, $3.50.
Oakley st. NV Of Taylor st, +, 90 4-1011o0 fl,
dated Sept; ? 1879 consideration, 8, $50.
Irving place, Of Jackson st n 11xl4s5< IT, dated
A~fTt q consideration
West moaroe st, 1928 $40 1t Of California Nv, I,
os11a4 II, dAted June 20, 1872 consideration $3.50
Feb. 16; consideration, s525.
California av, ecor Of Hava1d st, acres dated
Dec. u, 1872; consideration, 80, 600.
Feb. II consideration, s5o5
South rark Nv, bet Thirty-tirat aud Thirty-second
ss T. $40 feet to alley, dated March s. consider
Los IS in wilco1s Subdivision Of acres Of n x
of Of * : Sec Il, 10, 10, dated March !; con-
Ia T.; y i 5loek et glaeh 1e e Ct Sec 81 49, H.
n"f cor q Tucker st. Lots to &, dated jan.
., l.: s. II Has Block Is. sec SO, 4o14, dated Feb.
Iots Il and q, In Elia East Addition Except Sub
l.. snd 2s51ss I fes dated May 10, 1879; cousider
dated July %, 1s7a consideration, 5000. ~
Eastsd st. CT and near onondaga st, g I, Lot 3,
dated harch 8 couHideratou, s, 800.
Lot g. in Walah'an u Of Block 10, o, 9 K Sec, 20,
80 a dated March s; consideration, 81 600.
Ghi1ty-ainth St, corner Of Langley sts, Lots Al
md a ts1cept Lots and b. dated Feb. 10; consid-
ssy,aour av, corner Of Thompson st, o (, 4s11as
2t, dated March !; consideration, 1900.
NORTH CIT LIMITS.
Lots and IN Block II Raven8woo1, dated Feb 20:
consideration, 81 .50o
SOUTH OF CTTT L1suTH.
Lot IS, in Block !, Of II rods OF 4 &c., l. 80,
Il, dated 7cb. Z, 1872; consideration, $3.50.
Underwood AZ, 275 It u Of Forty-shird st, T. 25x
128x #, dated Feb. Is; consideration, 5000.
WEST OF 1tTX LIMITS. ......~
North az, cor Of 'Deerpath ~, Lots 4, s, and g.
dated March :; consideration, $4,000.