New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1872-08-02

,,,..-1os T. Alter vs.. J. Il. Pickett and
ua,,Iina Picket-From the district court,
,,ariab Of Bossier.-J Judgment Of the lower
court anuulled. and judgment OF the lhlrd
District Court for the parish Of EOrleans, ~
f,gor Of G. Il. Alter against 7. Pickett, Tor
$50 gl5 n, declared null and v0ld. ram
fih7s demand rejected. 1900
II. w. Turner, under tutor,ys u. r. - Neal,
sheriff. ct al.-FrOm the district court
of Bossier.-Ordered that the judgment Of
the lower count be amended by aInulIlng
that mart of it which DEGREES that the prop
ertv "be sold subject to the general taclt
mortgages Of planhns, anu LnaC a7 ON"'
amended il be affirmed.
Jacob CitrOn va. Eliza Well-From the
district court, parish OF Caddo.-Ofdeied
that the verdict Of the jury be set aside
that the Judgment Of the district court pc
annulled, and that there be Judgment re-
iecting plaintiffs demands and the defend
ants TecepventiOnal demand.
Carroll, Hoy s. Co. VS.. Eliza w. Wooiley-
From the district court, parish OF BosSIeT.-
JUDGMENT Of the lower court affirmed
Amos Abram vs. A. g. Teague-Appeai
from the district court, parish OF Bossler'-
Ordered that the Judgment o. thg Io"et
court be overruled; that there be Judgment
H. favor Of plaintiff and against the De
ra,dart for the sum Of $6l4 IL, with inter
oct from judicial demand, and for the dc
livery of 1858 pounds Of lint cotton baled,
arr in default thereof, for $40 -, with five
ner cent interest from January J, 1879 lur-
iher ordered that the attachment be nam
tanned; that tue privilege resulting there
from be recognized and enforced against
the propcrtv seized; that the reconyentl0n-
al demands be dismissed as III case OIL non
suit.
Louisiana Mutual Insurance COmpanyys.
Walters g. Elder-OTdcred that the Judg-
ment Of the district court be annulieu, ana
that there be judgment rejecting plalntlhs
demand
JUSTICE TALIAFERRO.
Winston, Morrison & Co. vs. Keys a.
McKnirht-From district court, parish OF
CaddO. Ordered that the Judgment be
Us, Copes vs.. Phelps & Co-From dis
trict court, parish Vi Caddo.-Judgment
affirmed.
G. L. r. King VS.. succession Of ). Is.
Tripg. and g. w. Breach vs.. same-FrOm
parish court Of BOssier.-Ordered that the
Judgment Of the parish court be annnlled,
avoided and reversed; ordered that the
rule taken by plaintiff be dismissed, re-
serving the right to prosecute their claims
against the succession in due course OF law
Simon Edwards VS.. James L. Robinson,
John Chaffe & Brother INSTRUMENTATION
district court, parish Of De Soto.-Judg-
ment affirmed.
Walters g. Elder VS. Mrs &c Beckham-
From district court Of Caddo.-Ordered
that the Judgment Of the district court be
annulled and reversed; further ordered
that plaintiffs recover from defendant
1857 81, with interest from January !,
1862, subject to a credit of $3.50 Il, pald
April q. 1868, and the further sum of
$40 81, with like interest from January !,
1862
JUSTICE HOWELL.
A. d. Battle Tvs. w. Jenkins-From the
district court, parish Of CaddO.-Ordered
that the Judgment appealed from be re-
versed, aud that defendant recover OF plain
tiff $435 1914 with interest from January J.
1868 in full settlement of their partnership
and persOnal accounts for the year 1867.
I'm. b. Rind and husband VS.. Jay L.
Hunsicker ct al.-Appeal from the district
court parish Of Ouachita.-Judgment al
firmed.
John Joseph Long vs.. l.. Templeman, Gu
rator-FrOm the district court, parish OF
Caddo Ordered that the judgment ap-
pealed from be reversed, and that plaintiff
Be recognized as q creditor Of the success
sion of j. X. j. Daniel, represented by i.
Templeman, curator, in the sum Of $1,000
with six per cent interest from January !,
1869, to be paid in due course of admins
traitor.
L.. j. Willis VS.. j. Nicholson ct al. f. NJ.
GilmeT, intervCn' From the district
court, parish Caddo-Judgment at
frmed.
Hoss & Durham VS.. +. d. Williams
From the district court, parish Of CaddO.-
Ordered that the Judgment appealed from
be reversed, and that the attachment is
sued herein be dissolved at plaintiffs cost,
and that defendant recover of them 500
damages 1t is further ordered that PLAIN
tiff recover Of defendant $699 20, with
legal interest from March 4, 1871, and the
privilege of fmnishers of supplies on the
property seQuestrated for the sum of $3.50
only Of said amount.
s. Russ. tutor, vs. L. H. WOODLAND
district court, De Soto parish.-Ordered
that the Judgment and verdict be set aside,
and that plaintiff, as tutor of the minor,
Rosa A. Williams, recover of the defend
ant $500, in full settlement of the partner
ship between the defendant and II. l.. w.
Williams.
Laura j. Willis VS. j. Nicholson ct al
From the district court, parish of CaddO.-
Ordered that the judgment appealed from
be reversed, and that there be judgment in
favor Of Il l.. Gilmer and L. White on their
plea of res jodicatd, Diminishing plaintiffs
action at her cost in the lower court.
Consolidated Association of the Planters
of Louisiana VS.. James w. Mason ct al
From district court, parish Of Ouachita.-
Ordered that the judgment appealed from
be reversed, that the exceptions filed 10y
the UtltNuhulS Db ONtII ult'lB anu lniL luiN
cause be remanded to be proceeded with (
according to law.
JUSTICE wYLY.
J. C. f. TAYLOR VS. David Pipes and /
Douglas, sheriff; same VS.. same, cOnsoli- ,
datUd-From the district court parish of
MOrohOuse. Ordered that the judgment be .
affirmed. LudeliDg and TalialerrO dissent |
ing.
Thomas Naughton vs.. B II. Dinkgrave,
sheriff ct al.-Iuiunction from the district +
court, parish of Ouachita.-Ordered that /
the Judgment be affirmed with cOsts. Chief /
Justice Ludeling dissenting.
Application Of w. w. King for moni- /
tiOn-FrOm the district court, parish of Bos-
sier.- Ordered that the judgment maintain
ing the exception and dismissing the case
be annulled, and that this cause be re-
manded to be proceeded IN according to
law.
Alexander Pope VS.. j. B. Foster, and wife
Jeannette Foster, i tervenOr-FrOm the
district court, parish Of De Soto.-Ordered
that the Judgment in favor of the inter
VenOr be annulled, and her demand be re-
jected; further ordered that the judgement
an favor OF plaintiff be amended bv allow
ing vendors privilege to be enforced ou.aU
the land described in the deed which the
plaintiff executed on the sixteenth OF De.
cember, 1863. 10 the defendant and vito
and as thus amended be affirmed
J. G. W. Lewis vs.. b. H. Dmkgraye
sheriff, ct al.-From district court. parish ug
Observation-Disclosures affirmed
MOblcy & Hamilton VS.. Tucker * Thur
mOud-Frum district court parish Of
Caddo.-Ordered that Judgment appealed
from he reduced to S3jl ~, and as thus
amended he affirmed.