The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1872-05-24

The following cases have been disposed of
| since our last report:
Strayer u Boose VS.. Husband case Jury
trial; verdict for plaintiffs for S93,33. Far
nandis for plaintiffs, Price for defendant
Dyer VS.. Gerwig; replevin; agreed. Hop
kins for plaintiff, Stump for defendant.
Joshua Thomas VS.. Jacob Kirk; CASE non
pros. Young and Maynadier for plaintiff,
| Webster for defendant.
School Commissioners VS.. Rogers appli-
cation for writ of a. q. d. ; inquisition con-
firmed. Young for plaintiff, no appearance
for defendant
| Proctor VS.. Williams; case Judgment
confessed. VanBibber for plaintiff, Young
for defendant
Dubois VS.. Hanson; case; judgment by de-
fault. Hopkins for plaintiff.
Lamott VS.. GGllion sci ia ; judgment fiat.
Archer u Van Bibber for plaintiff, Stump for
defendant.
Bowman vs. Cook & Taylor; judgment for
plaintiff Farnandis for plaintiff, Stump and
Rutledge for defendants.
Elliott u Backlar VS.. Aaronson; debt
Judgment confessed. Gilbert for plaintiffs, no
appearance for defendant.
Amos VS.. Harkins; action on case; judgment
on terms filed. Dallam for plaintiff, STREET.
for defendant.
State VS.. Henry l.. Taylor; indictment as
sault and battery; tried before the court
guilty; fined $50 and COSTS Hopkins fol-
State, Farnandis, Archer and Young for de-
| PENDANT
State VS.. Paul Chillcup; assault; compro-
missed under act Of assembly on payment of
costs. Hopkins for State, Gilbert for defend
ant
State VS. Theresa Caddell; indictment sell
ing liquor to minors: not guilty confessed
by State. Hopkins for State, Stump for de-
PENDANT.
Same VS.. Same; indicted for selling liquor
on Sunday; plea of guilty confessed. Fined
$50 and costs. Hopkins for State, Stump for
traverser.
State vs.. Mrs. T. Elbthal; indicted for sell
ling liquor on Sunday; not guilty confessed
by State. Same counsel.
State VS. Caroline Gier or Bower; indict-
ment, selling liquor on Sunday; tried before
the Court; not guilty. Hopkins for State,
Stump for defendant.
State VS.. Herman Stonerider; Indictment,
selling liquor on Sunday; tried before the
court; verdict not guilty Same counsel.
State VS.. same; Indictment, selling liquor
to a minor; tried before u jury; not guilty.
Same counsel.
State vs. John Reed and Henry l.. Taylor;
| Indictment, larceny; not guilty confessed by
| DJuIc. l1OphluS anu hublCQSC lOI ClulC, Ii.
w. Archer, Farnandis and Y Dung for traver-
ser.
State VS.. Lewis Frederick indicted for as
saulting an officer in discharge of his duty
tried before the court, and held sub cu,iG-
Hopkins for State, Webster and Young for
defence.
State vs. Abram Snyder; Indictment burg
| larry tried before the court; not guilty. Hop
kins for State, Maynadier Tor defence
State VS.. Peter Hoke; indicted for larceny;
jury trial; verdict guilty. Hopkins for State,
Rosan for trayeIser.
State VS.. Henry Frede; larceny; not guilty
confessed by State. Hopkins for State, Stump
for defence.
State VS.. John A. Moore; indicted for selling
and giving away liquor; tried before jury
verdict not guilty. Hopkins for State, IL. w
Archer and Lee for defence
State VS.. same indicted for selling liquor
to minor tried before the court; verdict
not guilty. Same counsel
State vs.. Sarah Ferry; two cases indicted
for selling liquor ON Sunday tried before
court; not guilty confessed by State Hop
kins for State, Ii. w. Archer for defendant.
Knelinger VS.. State Of Maryland; appea
under act of 1870, chap. 434; tried before tho
court; held sub curia. Street, for appellant
Rutledge and Hopkins for appellee.
Boarman VS.. Horn appeal tried before
the Court and judgment reversed. III. w
Archer and Farnandis for appellant, Webster
for appellee.
The grand jury adjourned yesterday, the
petit jury were also discharged, and the court
will, in all probability, finally ad ourn to day