, 1872-06-05
TILLAG TIL ST. CRoTx AVIS.

; s:$ :ss q 4; 4 S: e :: s ;5 :$@: t. III : :s; :; +; T. s. 81 +; e. e ;: s : ;;:;s e. f. s ,:$ s:;; +: s If !:s E I:
' a: y:%s %i ~ e' $, ? ct %1 tt: % 9s% s" 1885, s% nas 81; % . Hs' Gr ss been ' %$ 70 % @ ss
R% e S9 %5 E%s :sS% The yahy S%s9 sss4 sssSo s5og as / Il Is mot ssaya S
asPsss Court, and 2% place hem @sF L% G%t with with i" agp as% Co. . Days t %% % Tt . with
%'% T% %T sP%s% % said so y vas they are public cases. cases and where pubic po%pd9q Isl
4% %I s sa b ss% en-. @gga md %d 1 %nb n %%" ot, ' PT%s p% %%so s sn "H s 6 5i nSss oss
1 nc s .b n% sy S % sG sHay sE fHp "ba as"' r5 bo d2 d1 % e "n 2b% % o to%" Ss & o t %%ss
a 3"aS" stated sa r sa no~Sso s oS SaS' S this G" S" s Us ss % cd @ o% KNOW "' a %I %% S@ T point 1 %% and
'~a sd Member for F55%Gch Country District Esm%u %@4Htho honorable Ghahn%ssoMss
s ss . %1"i a h 1a% 1aj Jolffsn 9s% so % f o@nn o% 9% s % fSns sa" aS ssD s%%s the S SP" now
qanPAqs usy h dm? P%ssnSe2 there is one law ain &drsd in Gn44sjanmoia one in
hdIsy BEEN, they wdd have known bth has been explained to-day: Ia regard to Lnqno1aH'
plies will put tte"E% c THE %@m?"sd 5 the article arasei 1 @nia9 ( T@s" will BE- dm NOUS o Du@wss tor the the planters
"sn "% s that H w.; 5y S S5 n5 5% "%1' to .Fs4s 1S '' I R% ted % in PS:5 %' &% yS knew "$1 %% v% "'
the 1qon5o MnG" Butt can be dsiodl sr VIA h. proponents intend " be this dndeso
would i% % mI Sar % sp h"a agas% s%s% S nsonoo sh5s sopPoa " @ a% 5" o P, %4 a"a9 d %S are re
rather lengthy; but he for lis part would say hi" reasons were firstly M5y, 1;' with hn 8 Po5o fs %s we
va T% "a, he ne had had n S %. o the 6h h % Is } E%a 4 at n d. Seen R" hsRosya altered %l S 25 mad mode st & a%
.%n i have P SGsp the r "E 1 5& the "@ po @ @ "" ' %s P p"s s's so% @%% t osp% @5
f% % Th% S%T is is NOT not REQUISITE "S% fT to h ave gu qualified " lawyers @a to settle ts s petty s~s coming
a aS ~%a '% of Els M L Esoa %1 eases n %' a %": ad '@ M% % IN" S% "e oGd@1S ss Country SS N "& %
%6e SANG extent @h.aod%e That ~gna Should S4s AMY ne. not be allowed a% to 2t a" %n dust
Sa55 e rs b he i s.n the %s . aG r no@S @% 6S 0 SR%@% %@ do %%~ DSfo %p viii HT give o hi H"a advice %S'a pi
s qs%s1 will f 5s sss9 1SiE s VII the S:c ca%a not i" ''''""" fro" the r"%' and ne n%'" the whole
The Vrgop7rn inquired Hbo had understood the last Speaker rightly in sppoang that he
mean s %1 Ms a% "" 6@F " Sdsa% G"c o%% %s pp%@aaf GJI%"5 G% @& 71 Ultimately depend
on the T Limits E %hs aot1%oEE : %h5sl to ns P 55on s%mv5m na that, b.. tn, Council can
ompn9ze ITSELF they must nTt know @m wSmay M what E smmt He o vs @toaSi 5" see the Spofo'
vn 5" TF B s%d a %as for G S%1%1s1 "H; country 9T district % & 55 asked lit S IS the he me- meaning o% hat
I @Ty@ Pr pes%s nG n"T n lawyer T~5g used % in such @ cases. % !" police cases are treated nfa certain
form and even they we're to be hanered to the Tow CWL here would not be any law
YER as this would not change the usl laid down for hose cases. If neceSay the words cat all
events" may be struck ou; tyw we're simply ttee to imply datau other eases may or may
nth AIKEN from the PdNemAb; foy those where public prosecution NO tep place taken
from his function; bta almost all cases betW@na bOrer and Employer are low decided Without
any real sentences they. are fora great part settled by tho Poi@mssdant. The thing is plain
enough: we have hmn Governments own statement the Budget and gomg out that We
S;ss '' '%ss. J R Pr ::"$ %,ss is n S e. take s j." s a % ,, , %5 5an: :@S s%s. ' ss, s ~ $I p5 Ss: i: ?% t.:
Government had mott introduced the matter.
2dM Member for ChdsdanHedC Country District (R~oaa~Dm sale he fully acknowledge that
that vas the only reason why hose NnAksw were allowed to be embodied in the Report Bt he
must say that even after thee xpauaMmsg given to-day, heB no further on the way to understand
them in fact hb pehps evna little more puMd; the only thing that would seem to be clear is
that the JuRe would bea sort of superior tribunal for cases treated primarily by the Poicemata.
Thtw would be altering the established legal poiu between the Judge and the oicemate andH
noe nmct line be dn between the two fncMmnis,.h eew od be very room for the Judget
exercises powr over the PoiomNhr causing very sort of cases to be referred to the Judge w
need not go too far but tits very easy to see what the result would be-, f@me pyc cases btween
hhoresa and employers frd debts, etc. at hmesto bes settled BY the oi@n@hr, others by the
Judge; the power and AUTHORITY of he dcemastr would be undermined he would be a hndf
clerk or assistant to tm Judge And we need only rmembHh instances ffrmer times where there
was sort of rwry between the Judge aud PoMemaser a thing that in ray could
not be- hlpd even With the Judge best will Aud the Judge cam, if he be SO disposed
make the Poicmaserq quite an Inefficient mar in his post and it would be so all the more if