New-York tribune., 1872-01-18

.,o . .ssociatioDa necessity-in shors
al the rogues and active in the support Of
any part IN the me Governor was assured by all That S
I%i Iudce 6ai forever broken boO,. M," rowor Wbich
ana Mnnolntment would give him for the exp'n inbc
,inS OF Official dishonesty so strong M Miat,nent
pTssId that several papers published It ar
nlcJ fact and the majority OF ne opponents VIZ after
l vg,rd acainst il. One of the great daics ,bo
IOS1is,,'n~ "A very able editorial condemuat0 ort Ol y
~ and Intended TO warn the Governor agaln p,t tho
ing s Judge lost all It's courage upon ne n in warm
snnointmcrt was made, and comIaended mn,tioIlv de-
tdfms IndCcd the appointment was sunson made but
tcrmined uIOn, and would certainly nave ro knew GER
g. tlc rcso tc action Of few gentlemen WIZ ond
tsin facts e. which have but NagueH 20 nrorccd
dso%SeG So was cleared M Il only just to he nos'
influential vocae Of the Judge 10 ~ r,o1 ~ those
aicM ne rih Re w. ~ c6lrsc unaware when ne leh
his influence to the scheme, aS ndc'u -ntorr"J We
~, sooLcn of their recommendation 0i we Jnusc, nV
Nith lntcut 10 east doubt upon lHvh PN - -, win
mstrating the skill W th which rms iua'
support ndispeusah bic to him IN 0ppFOcnS 80 "V'ie
an officer as GOV. FyntOn. -, - ,,o,tbs Of
Tnc scheme Jailed, we have s3ld' h'u ,t Tbat
shorat byppcrisv had been wasted. The instant iha'
the iuge asceraIncd this, ne threw on e lsS irs, az
mnnicira frauds which he had previously granted & m
sncl zeal; concluding by ISSUING the GliS Ia
owed his defeat in part 10 the persistent Olpusou va 80 %
associates on the Bench, he gave an open 80 @
Of Lis spite ia characteristic manner dNIVa No. ar6
into Chamh,rs while the Judge was sitting mere anu
"stoJ Whether certain other judge was IN thc ihUer
rnou lad been GOWN lId' u"i' "'"0N
so"i'S. 81 g,n'r know ANYTHING about him. DON'T
tuoW ANYTHING about any Of them. There Is cTt IN
elass o men don't want 20 know any thng "bouI Nneu
tbC, come mn or an election then mean to know some
tnng atout thgm' htie later IA the "iy ue iniou, ,S
m, h ar thar he lid d" the most unmiuEated contempt
i,r an his SoC,s'o juds $ feeling anssH 'no' S"i'
.io-, mora Is, ,OCilily, and financially ,.,.- 49,
Tue ccug OF relief, when II was known that Ihe HUN
had determined not 10 maze SuS aIlutio,dc "a
nnder tie law, was general many VINO re- Ohi1enucu m ~
Judge hens secretly as glad 20 Oe saNtG onf IG
would have had nearly as much power in hi. hanns ~
an F1,tern Pacha Property 10 he amount OF SlOOMOU
In the charge Of receivers ana trustees ay NJ ms SIO
al since hc could appoint aud remove them at his dS
81 hi> friends they could obtain from him, without giving
lhc sgLt, - notice 40 creditors or other interested par
ncr tuat mi t i' their and his interests. There would
have ben no obstinate receivers 10 refuse
~ g,g 10 S 9'S' 53 oln' a tae SuSu court S'G%a wond
have Lad power ID grant OF dissolve nuunctlons,
- ~ "tIs OF iaahdbius hdn as Coz QS &c. 10y !.
little ingenuity IN r0nLC a'gUW pt5 o. decisions, he
sS' % "a r, aTSg RAT i'm ,'ii LARGE Class Of
esscs, oslccially IN those which involved Tie most
yCr6 tJd Lave carried ON business for week after the
Judge Lad resolved TO crush them, and IL was not
ictl h' l'"'I, hotu' " iHts peeh pu9Iny staten ~
tp,uh OF thc PROJECT tEat he was visited ny some
ouy u,t hIs opposition Ee should Lave share OF the
god Things al-siAs Out Of the scheme; telling him
ilt"cI, tt "iiAnscmcnis had been made 10 realize
f,rmU piOIis and practical monopoly Of the paying
O.,-c.s lCr those Who Dclriendcd the Judge.
or course nobody doubted tlat Barnard was rcfeTred
10 In Ibis passage, though he was not rlmed. The
iluons 10 iuclcuts in his career were Unmstdkeable
The Judge publicly took the application to himself, in
ee OF the many sC3udaous OF his court durin.
tue Erie suits between Drew and Vanderbilt 1t was
shortly after he famous scene IN which be was mpuSned
In his ovn tribunal by tho late james T. Brady. lie
questioned Witnesses himself about visit of certain
directors gentleman supposed to have peculiar In
aueaoc Ito Judicial mind aud the following dialogue
took place:
Qtcs'1u JJ Jtdgc EargTd u lr Belden--po YOU know
whether J"irts F.,6,ir., aud William H. MaTson went
IN caUtdgc John j. CTahc's house, and offered hin
OBJ To yacJtc jGis injunction; and did yOu hear from
Director Oi TIC Ere Railroad that tue Executive Com
uittcc had allowed that 10 he padl a. No one OF
the Directors told me this hut think heard some
ing OF the Liud. can't tel from whom heard IT;
derc were numerous rcpors ing about at that time
JWlJe BdT1i0r5 t00drCssing CounScO-I haven't ruled
The quest simply because want to know whether
am IL 10 sit on The Bench or mott II have been en
agcd IN u conspiracy, am uEht TO sit here
MT Fell sad the Gu 'Stlou would open new evidence
Nat Iul already been I1ucd out.
Jfdge B,JGSrd-It was ruled ont because intend tC
have tis AgyM american RCcicto put ia evidence Wen
nIouI written by clerk in y5uI
.Tio / inena nave this whole matter ferreTed ouf
abat y, course the end cf the matter, far as
Gc pulc learned. What the result Of Judge Bar
narGs "f'gretns" " may have been we can only guess
from tat distinguished magistrates subsequent r,la
tons VITA the "elcS in Ar Fields Office who reused
Liza ire.