Shepherdstown register. [volume] (Shepherdstown, Va. [W. Va.]) 1849-1955, 1872-05-04

Sheritls, !, Thos Chapline, Geo. hoonce
and K j. Kimball.
The Court resumed its session on
Monday last at clock, P. NJ, and has
been working vigorously to reach the
end of the Docket, this being the fourth
week of the term:
On the interpleader of Thos NJ Os-
born in the case of Geo. w. Chambers
vs. Daniel " Read, on which verdict
was rendered in favor of Osborn at last
term, motion was made for new trial,
and discussed at considerable length, by
Green & Lucas, and Mason & Brooke,
for Chambers, and Blackburn and Beltz
hoover for Osborn. Motion oyerruled.
The following jury cases have been
tried -
E. Cannon VS.. E. w. Miller, action
for compensation for building ola house
at Harpers + erry-swept away by the
flood. Verdict for plaintiff. Hunter
and +. W. Wilson for plaintiff, Green
6 Lucas for defendant.
Ramey & Washington vs. Childs,
McCreight Il Co., appeal, action arising
out of sale of wheat. Jury failed
10 agree. Cooke & Kennedy, and Bay
Tor il Wilson for plaintiff, Hunter,
Travers and Davies for defendants.
Mcfarland VS.. Geo. w Eichelberger,
ac,ion for value of horses sold fol- useon
the kabletown & Bloomery Turnpike.
Verdict for defendant Cooke IL Ken
nedy for plaintiff, Hunter and Traycrs
for defendant.
J. V. Underlonk'S Admnx., VS.. Mar
garet f. Mckcyitt, action Of debt on !
note. Fraud and failure Of consideration
pleaded. Verdict for defendant. Hunter.
Blackburn and Ingles for plaintiff,
Faulkner and BeltzhOoyer for defendant.
l.. Hopkins VS. G. l.. Weaver, as
sumpsit. Verdict for plaintiff, Davies
for plaintiff, +. w. Wilson for defend
ant.
S. D. Howell VS.. Mcmahon, assump-
sit Verdict for plaintiff. White IL
Trapnell for plaintiff, Travers ana Fouke
for defendant.
The case of Simon p. Snyder's
Admu'x., vs.. 4. J. W. Snyder and ia
cob SNYDER, on a bond, tried III Decem-
Der, 1870, and verdict for plaintiff, mas
been pending since on a motion made
and argued for new trial. after long
and careful consideration, Court over
ruled the motion. Blackburn and
Beltzhoover for plaintiff, Green u Lucas
for defendants.
Quite number of Chancery causes
have been argued and disposed of, the
Court usually holding night sessions for
trial of that class of cases.
L. n. Hucb, Esq, of Winchester,
Va. and Robt {. Custom, Esq, OF
Berkeley Springs, were admitted to the
Bar
Court is still in session at time of 60
ing to press, but is expected to adjourn
to day at IL o'clock for the term.
The following DEGREES and orders in
Chancery were entered
J. p. \. Entler VS. r. II. Lee, &c.
Decree to sell land.
Jas. VI. Myers VS. Mary a. Horn, &c.
Decree to ascertain and apportion assets.
l.. Il. Masons Admir- VS.. 5. Wrights
Administrative. Decree S35G.l6 with
liberty to enforce it against the realty.
NJ. j. Cromwell VS.. Logan Osburn,
Admir-, &c. Bill of review refused.
J. Baylevs, &c, VS. Mary Laley, &c.
Bill and amended bill dismissed.
J.. Sadlers Admir- VS.. Geo. Little's
Admir- Sale of realty decree.
). Hcnsell VS.. W. j. Henscll, &c. /.
T. Chapline relieved as special Com
missioner, and c. J. Faulkner, Jr., sub
stituted
Daniel Enters EXT. VS.. J. II. Nor
rison, r. II. Lee, DC. Injunction dis
solved.
Ed. II. Mcdonald VS.. William T.
Leavell, Trustee, DC. Decree for partl-
ton.
Adam Snowman VS.. Geo. Show and
the Board Of Supervisors. Injunction
dissolved at complainants costs.
Is. 5. McIntire VS.. NJ. b. Hoge, Trus-
tee, &c Decree to sell realty.
Jno. G. Unseld, &c. VS.. Jos. Myers,
&c. Bill of review refused.
Geo. W. Chase VS.. NJ. r. Packet.
Decree partitioning realty.
Burlcy's, &c, VS.. \. Marmion. De
cree for partition of realty.
Jas. I. Athey VS.. w. NJ. Marmaduke,
&c. Recommitted.
Jno. +. Shaull, &c, vs. n. S. White.
Injunction granted.
j. Ropp and J. 5. Bowers VS.. Smiths
EXT Interlocutory order entered.
w. H. Moore VS.. Albert l.. Moore,
&c. Sale OF realty confirmed.
J. c. UnSeld VS.. Z. Weises Admir-.
Decree for conditional sale of land.
J. d. Mcfarland and J. NJ. McFar !
land VS.. S. H. Brown, Guardn, DC.
Decree for settling Guardian s account.
Cromwell's Admir-. VS.. Cromwells
lcgatec. Decree to distribute a fund of
81 400
II. Is. Davenport vs. r. B. Washing
ton. Reference to c. Moore to settle !
partnership account.
pa MARKErs.-We clip the follow
mo from the Baltimore Sun of Thurs