New-York tribune., 1872-09-28
PRICE FOUR CENTS.

sessmcnt 400 issued 20O; shares not subject none
r. Judah, California friend ghI-Shares subject to az
sessment 1000 issued $4,000 not subject, none
T. Judah, California friend lghtshares subject to as
sessment, none shares not subject 200 issued, hoo
WILSON " Y Times (rght)-Sbares subject to assess
ment, 200 issued $4,000; shares not subject none
NJ j. Parrott Kansas right)-shares subject 70 asess
ment none; shares not subject, 800 issued s1,o,eo
Gen j. Cooper (right-Shares subject 10 assessment,
none shares not subject 50 Issued. $1,000
Simpson Cblack mail-shares subject to assessment,
none shares not suhect 26O issued. $4,000.
s. W. Johnson Kansas (righshares subject 10 assess'
men 1850 not issued 100000; shares not subject none
j. p. Usher-shares subject to assessment, 1000 no'
ISSUED, $4,000; shares not subject none.
c. Babcock, Kansas. supposed 10 be for Wilkinson
Shares subject to assessment 1000 not issued 900
TACT in reference 10 the future shares not subject none
FP Stanton. Kansas-shares subject assessment, 100
issued, $1,000 mo obligation in the past Look 10 the
future y shares not subject, none.
Cheeyer Washington, supposed TO be for Simmons, r.
I-Sharos subject to assessment, none tthe services
contemplated not rendered in full. Sec Judge
Thomas Ewing jr shares not subject zoo not issued
$4,000
r. W. Latham. supposed to be for Simmons, r. L. see
note Cheeyer)shares subject 20 assessment, nome
shares not subject. 800 not issued. $4,000.
H. r. Bennett right)shares subject to assessment 100
issued, 5000; shares not subject, none.
Martin, California do. not known)shares subject 10
assessment 200 issued slOOO shares not subject none
Martin, California subject to assessment, none
shares not subject, 200 issued $4,000
Franchett n. Y. right)-Shares subject to assessment
1900 issued, 10000; shares not subject, none.
FTanchett. n. Y. trighOshares subject TO assessment
none ; shares not subject, 500 not issued, $4,000.
n Curtis mo service)-shares subject to assessment,
100 issued, g, 900 shares not subject, nor:.
The Hon. j. s. Rollins, Mob. CrighO Shares subject to
assessment 500 issued $4,000; shares not subject
e. fpctf 70
ment 2O0 issued, $4,000 shares not subject none.
Hold it over them in terror.
Fielding Johnson Kansas-Shares subject TO assess
ment 100 not issued 5000; shares not subject none.
c. Adams, Kansas, Gen. Lanes son-inaw Tlght-
Shares subject to assessment none shares not SUBJECT,
200 issued $4,000
W. W. Backus, Leavenworth tighD-shares subject 20
assessment so issued s25Oo; shares not subject,
none.
j. Moran, Missouri mo scrylcc)-shares subject TO
assessment 400 not Issued, $4,000; shares NOT subject
none.
Josiah Miller, Kansas GighO-shares subject 10
assessment 100 not issued 5000; shares not subject,
none.
Chester Howard, Gen. Lanes friend tright)-sbares
subject TO assessment Issued 5000 shares not
subject, none.
The above is fair illustration of the method of
disposing of the stock which should have been aI-
Piled to the uses of the road The list is believed 20
be by no means complete one, us OlnetS ar Ai''"
to have shared in the plunder. But sufficient -
therein developed TO show the completely OF Speaker
Blaine, who so vocferousy denied all connection
with the Credit Mober fraud, and that of Gen.
Pomeroy, Mr.. Shackelford, Caleb Smith, Secretary
Usher, r. w. Thompson, and other shining Iights IA
the Administration camp.
Speaker Blaine prOued to hare reoeired alloments
of 80 800 shares of stock subject to assessment and
valued at = ,62J, 900; five thousand nine hundred
shares not subject g. assessment valued at S2e50o
and 1900 shares more allotted, but not assessed.
The two latter lots, not subject to assessment, were
secured by Blaine for himself; while the 81 800 shares
of stock subject to assessment were supposed 10 DO
for distribution among his supporters in helping 10
procure the passage Of the bill, and subsequent
amendments