Daily national Republican. (Washington City [D.C.]) 1870-1872, 1872-06-24

NNH NuWNNt AeAAN luN NNlH pun Naft w
they are willing % couour IN joint application
70 The tribunal Of arbitration at once 70 adjourn
the prOceedings Of the arbitration, which they
Arbitrator @ 10, Span suoS S' an Application,
without ffush treaty"
Secretary Fishto General schenck ,elegtaphs
5Ins res ggySTn| 1sa o. ,hS un anas.sd IL
Lord 0rhnviies note TO you, that u Il not neces.
sary Tor the agents TO present the arguments OF
The ts'gssyS gSy'rnmsnn" 90 me ISSh ,h,
the arguments be printed within specified
time, which specified time will expire on the
Being a treaty requirement, the Executive
Department Of the Government cannot depart
from It's obligations, and has not the power 10
consent 70 a change Of Us terms;
Britain, with the idea Of future negotiation, II
Is right that with reference 10 the Senate article
Il should be understood that this Government
cannot negotiate on proposition which involves
the idea that u may Be guilty Of International
III faith or OF willful violation OF Its interna-
tional dutlos or that u regards such acts on the
lion BY the payment Of damages In money.
sECRETART TIsH TELEoRArHs TO GENERAL
scuENcK.
"Athough, by a literal construction Of the
Senate article, cases OF bad faith or wilful mis-.
conduct may Be held 10 be within its scope, u Is
inconoeivable that such cases can ever be the
subject Of diplomatic corTospondonce with a view
TO pecuniary compensation between two powers
such as those now Concerned.
0EHEnAL soHEScK 10 SECRETARY risu.
Acknowledges the receipt Of the telegram,
and adds, ~ heard from Davis last week that
our argument would be ready on the 18th, and
Lord Granville told me theirs would he.
anCRErAnY Ftsu TO OENHnAL BcHENCE.
Juusg
Says awe concur In the opinion that the arbi.
traitors have the power TO adjourn either on their
own motion or on the motpn Of either party,
Iftha araumenta he pdt IN on both sides on
18th and Great Britain move tor an adjournment
this 0overnInent will concur,
Tune 4 the text Of a COMMUNICATION from Earl
GRANVILLE In which he says, "If both parties
agree not 70 present any argument I'll a later
day than me lSth OF JIns ,Iea1s,tlng me arb;
on any day 10 which they may have adjourned,
accept the argument which both parties may
then wish TO tender TO them, this will be quite
Cisasrai sehsnck teiegraphs Secretary Fish,
June sth "rhs Opposition 10 Parliament have
strange and unworthy susplclons and fears that
the last clause OF the article, although In the
language OF their own government, Is not ex.
pllclt enough TO prevent the Indirect claims
IRON being again brought forward. Might We
not offer that u this government will accept the
Senate language for the expression OF the rule,
We will agree 10 the last clause Of their form, ~
communicated 10 you 10 my telegram Of the
3ist Mpy; adding thereto tho words "but will
theteup0n abandon those several enumerated
claims rs have cause Of difference between the
two Countries TO be considered by tho arbltra.
$1,000, ,',., -, so,.,,., 80, y.v,,,
~" ss.sst,s D ~
JuSEA
I'VE cannot agree 10 the suggestion in your
,sIIh Inc Rritish vovernment and nat WIN onno,
sItion msmbeTs II pariiament' II that Govern.
ment adopts the unworthy suspicious aud fears
~ rsasons f,r moiiIyinay the nronosei articie or
sugKest that his aoyornment will moi In gooi
fslth al imam the syree mani contaInsi th.rSin
All f1rthsT neg5tistins must cease Al once.
IL NJ docs moi adont or sntertaIn those ana
Dicions tbsra n no rgasoy fer n,onosins 10 Ala
The LANGUAGE which was proposed by ilseif has
been acssntsd Nv M. and which "a nfisI.ntly
s~nlicIt Won nav NV that ma govsrnncnI
rs,bsr,is the nav raIs contained IN ths nronassd
article a. Inc oonslderatIon' and will aocspt n
a. q anal so,,iemsnt ~ ,ha thee ciasses ~ ina
IndlreS, ciaImS NM Iorth In nnr cass IN which
ihsx haye abiscieI ~ W. W "S''
IL is useiesS 10 sIpert that any ehanye ran be
made IN me article n agreed to by the senate.
A traaIv IN ana 1cris y,hich thS Ss,a,c b,d
1870 MIN 10 s bs rs,,naS ~ s me-. sv nh
o,t dnhSic and IN n lew minatss Ans cT,nss
bovover ImmaterIai ,,onid inyolye aissns'1cnr
aSd gshafc AMI IN The crovisJ ,,,te M ihci,
LnsIncss y,ould insyitabtv isad 10 ths defrat ~
tbe treaty
we think alan that thIs C,oyernment has
made a large soneession for tho sNks Of main.
taInInsr ths NJ nrincinIes invnIvrd in INC
trcatve n can maES ~ mora "
To Inc teiegram from Gep. sehepck to Mr..
fish, June 0, the former states that he has had
no exchange OF views with anybody In England
but Government through the proper channel,
and that they tho uoyernment) have not
adopted or sympathised With the tears and sus.
plcions Of others IN regard 70 the last clause Of
nhepsoposeu, AIIcie, Dut ueienuen y as sulnelsnt
S siip S ~ tust tosoNeu
t ~. u, ~ " ~, rnou nv
- wy W I'i, " .nu nts. note.
upseInht " tno on't AZ, staee 1919 must seo tna.
biPOssloie W hvr ntaJvas,y = Hovetn ~,
os,,,, ~ a. ~ rasis x, LILLE ~ ,aLtnh ~,
nssoh " s.Nh n, thnv,sS n nv "ousv' WhOn W
he i W net tasJssy - ,, th ii W one
.nluk uhon ms sr uhueIstanninB ~ the gu.
.yss ~ t,,iS sSpu "I ~, sn ~. " ~,
n,i,,. =, y y, ~ sno ~
~ i,. - 49, sIs S " ~ ~ y
W " P'' h1 " " tne iotu y,
Inu ~ tn ,,se nsu "l'sy t,, m
s, - " y. y n ~, y. y, - : = ~
nSan,,no ~ $1,000 ~ Nj pish n 81,
nt.sni Thnsr,pn rSitSgsj -, ~ Ssn. ~
aiIhnn,sh ,ha,a -. ,,nt ,t,na ~ ~ ss,itSs,In
- ~ snhans ~ nan y, ~
~ ina ." w INV A''"
ma no,. fam, or, f,r.nyi,I, N n.n.,,I
scS.nnh .aUs, !. IL, sia,sstS's inY.sDnsni ! "a
stIII ready either 10 agree ia an applIcatIon 10
the arbItfators on the 18th 10 adi6urn Al once
without Inc DresentatIon Of the arRument Of
either Government or 10 conclude a new ar.
ranKemeut with the treaty. making mower Of the
Tinted states for the enlargement OF The time,
or Instead Of the amendments 10 the treaty mr.
ticle which Her Matestyis Government last pTo-
posed they are willing 10 conclude IL with the
following Additions;
I" FIRST, 10 insert after the paragraph as al.