Green-Mountain freeman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1844-1884, 1872-11-27

| uOe bl-tySS 4 F. nays iii.
Mr. Haskins, oi B-att'eb 'ro, mnv.d that
The House adJ1urn; mot agreed tr-yeas So,
NAYS lie.
| Mr.. IIa>kins, of Brattleboro, moved that
the IN tiOn OF the gentleman from Peacham
be laid on the tablt, and made the succ al
order for Tuesday morning next, at 10 l-2
. clock.
Mr. Bruce of Westmore. moved the pre-
viOus questions. which Was seconded
NJ. Bulnu, of Burlington, moved that
the II u>e ADJOURN; not agreed to.
| L motion of the gentleman from Brat
tlt Iro VAS disagreed To
The O IestInu recurring on the motion of
the gentleman from Petcham. Mr.. lie. of
Barnet, demanded the yeas and nays, which
were taNen-ayrs s., nays l2l; 50 the mo-
tIUn to reconsider WIS last.
AFrKRN on
SEEArE.-J0iat resOIUii0H. - From the
II 'use, reatIve 70 fual adj ,urnm-nt.
Senator BIgelIw inquired of 5 nstOr Bal
| ley al To ,e condition uf certain business.
Senator Bailey replied that the committee
apPnInt ed TO investigate the Centra' Rail
road INA ter were unah e TO have their first
| meeting until this week, aud if II WAS ex-
| pected th Il they were to maze thorough
tx rnIuatiOn h. would LAY that they couli
| hardly make commencement b. next We'd
mes lay.
The question being on Senator Bselow's
! amepdneut for an adj urnment until t1e
| 81 Wednesday IN JdzIu try. Senator B genw
= aid he thought that from the statement
IN tde by the chairm an of the investigating
COMMITTEES, that 1t would be impossible Tor
them to make their reports by Tuesday ne xt.
and further advocated the amendment Dur
Ing the debate Senator Bailey who advO
| Gated adjournment to a fixed day, ex-
| nj TOD he TD of tar b..
/ committee To Inve>tlSat the charges against
the Vermont Central railroad tl4t app trenr-
! ly rem sIned To be performed before 4u intel
lIsent report could De IN ,de, aud the utter
mrOsSIblnty OF closing thls work by Tues
dty next.
The amendment was rejected.
Senator BItterfeid hOpsI the resolution
would pass
5 nttor Reynolds said that it appeared
before tle co nmittee that there were nov
227 bills MT acted up N, yet the Commute,
U.Ougnt hest To recommend the alOptton y
the II 'use resolution.
) nat5r hinckley moved II amend BY
striking out 8 Il. IN an inserting 9 u.
Senator Cupenter opposed the amend .neut
Senator H'Ecklev repli-d, repeating hI-
objections t. a morning adjournment, whIc
un4vo'd ,bly inclu ling a nisnt session.
Senator Reynolds was opposed to the
ameuduen
Senator Powers thought thiz WIS not
question of convenience - mem'es, bIs
q ,estIon OF duty TO the state lie rev ewe0
the argument ot the Senator from Ora lge.
Senator uInckley, and opposed tie amend
meut.
Senator Carpenter further remarked I
pressing that he had no fears from inten
perancc a. on ACCOMPANYING Of a night Sc
sion. Further d scuss, by Senator Yc,zal
Scn tor H'nckey Wit drew his ameud-
ment, and the resolution adopted.
Senator Carpentrr uffer. i a re- lutin,
whIca - adopted, author z NJ the invest
gttlnS Committees T. pursue thei VEST -
IlOus after the adiDurum NJ OF the Gsuert
Assembly ani report to tn Governor, an
puh.ish the rep'Tts IN toe newspapers.
Ii USE. R purt.-Fr)m ~ rct committee
(maj1rIy } IN favor OF ). O., dividing IT..
JoW Of " es Jmiuster; Mr.. Clark ul IN ti...
tor minority Ot c'mmICtee, resented Il IN
nurItY report. whicl was read. After r,-
marx, by Mr.. BuJterfeld of Wilmington |
Mr.. Lynue Di Marlboro aud NJ II 3nrv " |
Z ester, the laet named gentleman N 5ved /
that the bIil he dismissed, ami gave re =
son for ms motion that the notice Of appIica- /
tlOn tor DIV ding the town was Insufi lie
The mptIUn 10 dIsmIss was favor 4 by NJ /
Urmsbee OF Brandon, a"d Mr.. PIugree
Hartford; aud opposed by Mr.. Bu te. f Id 4
" IlmIngron, Mr. 6OyntOn of Wooistyck /
Mr.. Stevens OF esJminster, aud MIR, Sher /
man oi ID yer. a ter further dIscus-IOu b, /
Nr. Rogers Of Newbury, aud Mr.. Wate
man of Hydepark, Mr. Lynde OF Marlboro
raised the point of order that this being d |
senate oil, Ehe mO,IOn to dt-mi-s was not i
order. and the Speaker decided that the
point was we'll taken.
Mr. Henry OF Chester. and Mr.. Davis
K 'adIng. thea prOp0dnded certain iuq ITIes
10 Nc Lyude Ut Marlboro. eltirman of the
committee, relative 10 facts appe ,riug be
lore that Committee, TO which Mr.. Lynde re
pIed.
Oebtte on the merits of the bill WAS con-
tInued up TO the hour OF j lurn urnt.
SATURDAY, Nov. %.
Reports.-From cou uittee on fnsncr.
against joInt resolution, providing for
painting adoption reused.
SPECIAL Orders. I6. (N4wbury Semin-
ary buD repjrtsd adversely hy the COM
mittee, with prop sal Ot amendment, by MIR
Powers, when was advOc tied by him, tht
amendment providing that the trustees NAV
sell the prOpe ty IN c'ntroversy fIr 5000
but does not provide tor tue transfer as cJa
templated by the bill.
Mr. Bailey read from the decision Of the
Supreme Court TO the effect that tht
{ Il erence had NJ longer ownership OF con-
rJl ut the property. lnterrogatUries by Mr.
Carpenter, responded to by M-. a ans as 10
whether any OF tile O!ig nal dunatUrs I"
New bury ), minary were now living IN New
bury. Tne answer was that It d d not a,-
., ar be core the committee how 10 any.
Mr.. lin 'kley opposed the passage of tn.
''iH. insisting upon tie sac edness and per 4
ma neucy of the franchise TO Newbury. ,
Mr. Carpenter urg ii the pert elton of th'
bill by such amendments as It's friends de
sure, and then 10 consider the bill On it.
merits.
II discussion was continued by Messrs
Shedd, Adams. Veazsy the latter havIu- .
come TO a conclusion different from the re~'
IF the committee, believing that sale of the =,
could be authorized without any :
violation Of the constitution. lie proceede'
10 give the legal view OF the case as 1t ap-
Deared to him. I
Mr.. Carpenter followed in the debare en-
iering somewhat into the history OF Newb ~ L
an the proceedings In chaneery, {
a relation thereto, claim NJ that the trans
er to Montpelier only needed an act OF she =
legislature to legalizs it. The court only 2
iecIded that the transfer could not re made D
n that way. lie quoted the transfer ii
Norwich University To n Irthtield. and saIu u
With the passage OF the bill an it, prupOs u
menImenrS, under c)usideI alton, this would
Il precIs ly similar way. r
Mr.. uhckley c,ntinued the argument IL :,
pposItion I'd the bIll lie said II the instI v
ulIon was dead aud the buildings going 1I
euay as had been charged, iE was d cond m
ion brought abOu: by the friends of this bii. ~
nd not by tn Sc opposing it. He furth |,
eplied t. tie arguments IN favor of the bill. -,
rglng bis pOIuts against tr er with IN lc :,
al nestntes, and incidentally remarked tba -
he Trustees Ut the VermO Cunereuc u
and Fem ale College had learn, q 10
eIter than To leave their Montpelier instItu Il