Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-02-18

e3 poles to black oak sapling on VIM Swan's
| line, thence north 4S iweSt 80 poles 70
! a post oak corner with John Thompsons line
thence with his line north 80 west l9S noles to
| stake, with sapEngs marked as pointers, on
| formerly Thomas Rodgers line thence south 50
| west 90 poles TO q rock set in the ground In
field, thence south 40 east II poles crossing the
I center Of sink in a field to post oak, thence
south o9 east 20 poles to the beginning contain
ing one hundred acres more or less being tbe
same tract Of land sold on the 9Th day of March
1867, by q decree of the Chancery Court of
Knox county, and j. a. Mabry became the
purchaser sale confirmed at the April term,
Of the Chancery Court, 1867.
A certain tract or parcel of land in the county
of Knox, second civil district, bounded as fol-
lows beginning at small post oak corner,
with s. Howells line, thence with HowelPs lins
north 70o and 30 west 81 poles, crossing the
spring branch to a double black oak, thence
north 70 and 80 east IL poles to "a small walnut,
thence north - west 81 poles to q small post
oak, thence north Is east 20 poles TO q stake,
THENCE north II east II poles to q stake thence
sf south 0o east - poles to stake and pointers
thence with the line of Mrs Moran and
Howell to the beginning, containing one
hundred acres more or less being the same
tract conveyed to Jos. y Mabrv by Anpa
ChaYannes and registered in book E. volume
q page oo9, III the Register office Knox county
y certain tract OF land situated in the county
or Knox, and State Of Tennessee bounded az
follows: beginning at stake pole east of the
head OF spring iii the gap of q ridge, and cor
ners with the VIM Swan farm, thence south 60
west ~ poles TO pine and black oak sappIIng.
thence south Il vests poles TO q post oak
thence north % west 19S poles 10 q hickory bush,
thence north % east So poles 10 a black oak
thence north 81 west 1i6 poles to O black oak
thenco tL north o4 east la poles TO hickory.
thence south 16 poles to a small hickory, thence
east W poles to Il post oak, thence south 50 cast
l88 poles to stake thence south ~ west Is
poles to walnut stump, thence south Al east 2s
poles TO the beginning containing two hundred
acres, moro or less, being the same tract con-
veyed TO Jos y Mabry on the 18th day of Sen
tember 1862, by John p Thompson, and regfs-
tered in book a, Volume 5, page So
, The following lots in Nelson, Swan and Ma
bry's Addition to Knoxville to-wit Nos -
q, q, go Sc 81, GO, 81, G2, s., So, 70, So, 104
100 and LOG, being sixteen lots alsU lot No 4. in
hennedy's Addition to Knoxville and fifty-siN
lots in Mabry's Flint Hill Addition to Knox
vile, from No to 56, inclusive
All of the above described propcrtv is Ievied
on as the property of Jos \ AIabrY to satisfy
judgments that have lately been confirmed bT
our Supreme Court Of Errors and Appeals. at
Tennessee, ir the following causes,
as they stand on the Execution Docket of said
Court viz, rs follows:
Jos a Mabry VS. James Bell.
Jos y Mabry vs. Robert Russell, surviving
partner.
Jos Mabry vs. II Armstrong, for the use
JOS n Mabry vs. John \ Williams.
Jos ~ Mabry and wife vs. ChurchwelI and
Armstrong.
JOS \ Mabry vs. NJ l. Rodgers, administrator.
Ut al
Jos y and q w Mabry vs. \ Nee.
odell and Mabry vs. Wilkins and Freel ad-
lninistrator
- Brownlow aud Rosl Vs. Lyon and Ramsay.
Trustees.
John Helms et al, = Gordon Mynatt, adj
ct al
Mabry and Rule W Temple Harris
John Helms ct alvs q w and n Mabry.
Mabry vs. Cowan, McClung & Co,
Jos Mabry Us T S Webb administrator. =,
Jos Mabry VS. Geo Margraves.
Also, one execution. from the Chancery Court
1f Knox county, in favor of d \ Deadrick
Z q VI. VS. Jos y Mabry and J w OdeU
V. +. GOSSETT, Sheriff