Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-10

10 a post oak, thence south % east So poles IN
the beginning, containing one hundred 49,
more or less, being the same tract of land soT5
on the 9Th day of March, 1867, by decree of
lthe.Chancery Court of Knox county, and To-
I a MaDry became the purchaser; sale conGr,,'
ed at the April term of the Chancery Co..
A certain tract or parcel ofland in ths
ty of Knox, Second Civil District bonnoac c9un-
follows beginning at small post osL tu oo as
with s. HowePs line, thence with HovaI1,O i ;er
north ~ deg and 80 min. west 81 poles cross ie
the spring branch to double black oat tLSng
north q deg and 80 min. east Al no oH, 'nehee
small walnut, thence north 20 west n noIoI -
small post oak, thence north As east 70 poIo 20
stake, thence north 46 east "a poles t6 SsoIla
thence south so east 81 poles to stake and nn
tiers, thence with the line OF Mrs, Morgan and
Howell to the beginning, containing one b anu
dred acres more or less; being the same t ,ul
| conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anno Tt HcI
vannes, and registered in Book Z. Vol ma,
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox COUNTY f"5e
| A certain tract OF land, situated in the COUNTY
\ Of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded "
follows: beginning at stake pole east of ,5n
head OF a spring, in the gap of ridge and cor.
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence sontb eo
west 4O poles to pine and black oak sannlin,,
t thence SCUM 70 Il west Is poles to post OAK
bush, thence north so east Sc poles TO b1oo{{
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles IN = Ii"Ci
oak, thence north 81 east 104 poles 10 boi ICA
thence south ~ poles to a small hickory tbon55,
east 6O poles TO a post oak, thence south Ii cast
loS poles to stake, thence south 20 wost 0' 10
poles to walnut stump thence south A. oos. 90 90
| poles to the beginning, cOntaing two bnnJ-oJ
acres more or less, being the same tract conI.l
ed to Joseph A Mabry. on the 4th day of Sen.
TENDER, 1867, by John z Thomson and a r 1eP
tered in Book A, Vol 8, page SIS SOi' ana regis
The following lots in Nelson S,,or G. NJ,
addition to Knoxville, tO-wit: Nos - 90 20
80 Sc, o., 90 81, o., 81, 60, 20, So, IO4 los 10G
being sixteen Lots: also Lot 4 in KennedvS1
addition to Knoxville. and ffty-six Lots in n. >
brys Flint Hill addition to Knoxville from, IA
l to SO inclusive
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ma.
bry addition to Knoxville, to-wit: 0l"-
1st Range South, Nos. so, 81, l07. 10 To-
40, 13l, !34 49, 1885, 49,, 129, I28, i09 los mi
~, liz, Ia, 12S, 124 125 126, II, p, q, Is ~
ID Range South, 49, 81, 63 81, 155, 158. 10
156, al, l42, Isl, 90, 153, I54, 60
LIST Range North, ., 81, ITO, 100, ia, III, 113
~, lbs, 1874 105 100, 1l8, III, 1lG, II5, ~, IN
49, = III, 49, 1 l$5 596 49, 1$S D. 49, 2S 81 80, s.
I'd Range North 81, 49, 81 40, 81, I52. 1a
154, 155, l56 157 49, 139, 147, AZ, l49. $50 Isl
1G0, 16l, 1G2, g. 60, S. 100
20f acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
OF Knox county, ana described March l. 1867
as beginning on Spanish oak, running thence
! north as deg. and l54 min east 1877 poles. thence
west pole to a post oak stump, thence south 10
| deg. west 169 poles, thence south 10 east ~
| poles to stump, thence to the beginning
being part OF the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North of
james Bells, now ThOs Z Champions proper
| ", belonging to 5 a Whites estate and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabrv b9
John Williams MI and J J Craig. executors Of
ed in the Registers Office of Knox ceunt3- in
| Book A. Vol: Sd, page 4O1.
10 acres of land lying in the I'd civil district of
Knox county and bounded and described a
follows, to wit: Beginning at stake on the
FAR Grounds fence, running thence S 81 Z T.
poles with said fence, thence S AZ E IA poles
with said fence, thence s 40 E poles with said
fence, thence s % f q poles with said
fence thence N 90 Z 134 poles to stake corner
to Ma0ry IA and q Howell near the branch,
line Al poles to a stake, Mabry's corner, thence
north 3 west Al poles with Mabry's line to a
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake.
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry. April %, 1862,
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book Il,
Vol. Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4, and g. as designated upon the
map OF the Kennedy property on file in the
Gh9neery Court of Knox county, in the case Of
+. w. Nanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to JOS A.
Mabry by ID. A. Deaderick, c. Il NJ, Nav 7th
1865, by deed registered in the Registers Office
OF nm hno x county, in Book Z. Vol. 3, page $40
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 98l acres of land lying in the 10th civil
district OF Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph Mabry by Jno Pate guardian, &c,
by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county, in Book Y. Volume 2, page 243,
and dated May 3, 1853. Said land adioins the
lands of Archie Walker, Smith anC others,
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One Issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
in the case of L M Fatio vs. P Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennessee, to-wit:
No. 2,267, in the case of Brownlow & Ross VS.
Lyon q Ramsey, trustees &c, ct ais
No. 2266, IN same case as next above
No. 2O65, in case of Odell 81 Mabry vs. vii.
kins 81 Freels, administrators
No. 20G6, in same case as next above
n. ,943, in case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
VS. Chuschwell & Armstrong
No. !, 944, in same case as next above
No. 1,SO5, in case of Mabry & Rule vs. Tenn
pie Harris.
No. ,S04, in some case as next above
No. 1874, in case of Jno A Williams VS. J
Mabry ct ais.
No. 1875, in case Of Jno y Williams VS. J \
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2270, in case of Jno L Helms ct ais Is e.
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
No. 2,2G9, in case of Jno Helms ct ais vs. G
Mynatt admir-, ct ais.
No 2,0l4, in case of A Is G w Mabry VS. C.
\ Nee.
No. 2O15, in case of A s G w Mabry vs. G
4 Nee.
No. 2O16, in case Of y & G w Mabry V G
A Nee.
No. !, 7O5. in case of J \ Mabry VS. 7 S Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. /, 7O6, in case of J A Mabry VS. 7 S Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. ,73l, in case of ] a Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. ,73O, in case of A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves
No. 1857, in case of j \ Mabry vs. james
Bell
No. 1,788, in case of J \ Mabry vs. james
Bell.
No. /, S27, in case of y Mabry vs. Cowan,
McClung q Co