Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-17

- poles, crossing the center OF sink IN a field
to post oak, thence south 50 east 96 poles to
the beginning, containing one hundred Sere %
more or less, being the same tract of land sold
on the 9Th day of March, 1867, BY decree of
thesChancery Court of Knox county, and los
A Ma6ry became the purchaser; sale coRfrm
ed at the April term of the Chaneery Conf
1867. q = ''"
A certain tract or parcel of land, in the oou
ty of Knox, Second Civil District bonndeJ UNI u
follows: beginning at small post oak Co.'S as
with s. Howelrs line, thence with HoweIPs linz
north ~ deg. and 80 min west so poles CrosI ie
the spring branch to double black OAK tbonag
north % deg. and 80 min. east Al poIes -
small walnut, thence north 20 west "a nolos .
small post oak, thence north As east 20 polas ~
stake, thence north 46 east "a poles to stake
thence south 80 east 81 poles to stake and no;o'
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs. Morgan and
Howell to the beginning, containing one bnnI
dred acres more or less; being the same frao,
conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anna Chs
vannes, and registered in Book E. Vol 8. na@o
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox county, F"s'
A certain tract of land, situated in the 1opn,,,
of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded -
follows: beginning at a stake pole east of fbo
head OF a spring, in the gap of a ridge and cor
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south "a
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sannIinc,
thence south q west % poles 10 a ndSt onk'
thence north so west 1913 poles to a b;cl."-.,
bush, thence north 50 east SO poles 10 a SHoY
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles to . 6aci>
oak thence north Of east 104 poles 10 bici,nr,,
thence south IS poles to a small bictor,H thy
east GO poles to post oak, thence sontS % me-
1SS poles to a stake, thence south IN uDost 10
poles to walnut stump, thence south a. east D;
poles to the beginning containg two hundred
ed to Joseph A Mabry, on the 4th dav Of sly
TENDER, 1867, by John p Thompson, and reo!Ps-
tered in Book A, Vol. 3. page $50
The following lots in Nelson, Swan 6 Mabrvis
addition to Knoxville to-wit; Nos. y. y, ~
being sixteen Lots; also Lot 4 in KennodIUUyD
addition to Knoxville, and ifty-six lots in NJ
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville, from \"
to Sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ma.
brys addition to Knoxville, to-wit;
Ist Range South, Nos 80, 81, IO7. ITO r,-
$50, Isl, !34, 135, 49, 1872 129, Us, 100, los nj
119, 40, 121, 122. - -
ID Range South, q, 81, 63. "a, 1j5, 15s 80
156, 141, 142, 151, !52, 153, I54, 60 ~
1st Range North, %, 81, 40, 100. ia III r12
III, 133, 134, 105 100, 118, III, 1l6 II5 ~ 15s
40, $50, 135, 1876, 49, 1873, y, 10, %. ~ 33 3
40, JOG, 123, 124, rs. 126. ~
ID Range North, 81, 80, 81 40, Isl, 152. 15s
| 16O, 16l, 162, "a, 60, So. -'' 100
Ol acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
| of Knox county, and described March |. 1852
| as beginning on spanish oak, running thence
north AZ deg and 15l min east 49, poles, thence
d., thence south ~
deg. west 169 poles, thence south 10 east Is
poles to stump, thence to the beginning
| being part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North of
James Bells, now ThOs E Champions proper
| ty, belonging to S A Whites estate and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph a Mabry bT
John Williams and j j Craig, executors of
| Sam A White, March l, 1862 by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knox county, in
Book A. Vol: Sd, page 4O1.
Of ap1 L., AZ n
Knox county and bounded and described as
| follows, to wit: Beginning at stake ON the
Fair Grounds fence, running thence S GO T. II
| poles with said fence, thence s AZ f. Is poles
with said fence, thence s 40 Z poles with said
fence, thence S % Z q poles with said
fence, thence N sc E 13i poles to stake corner
thence North % East with Mabry's
line Al poles to a stake, Mabry's corner thence
north 81 west Al poles with Mabry's line, to a
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake.
| thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry, April %, 1862,
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book E.
Vol. 3d. page 240.
Lots Nos. 4. 8 and 6, as designated upon the
map of the Kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court of Knox county, in the case OF
| +. w. Vanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to Jos. A.
Mabry by II. "A. Deaderick, q. IL NJ, Nav 7th
1863, by Geed registered in the Registers Office
| of Knox county, in Book E. Vol. 3, page 80
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 9Sl acres of land lying in the 10th civil
| district OF Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w 1iabry now lives, and the
| same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph A Mabry by Jno F Pate, guardian &c,
| by deed registered in the Register office of
and dated May 8, 1853 Said land adjoins the
| lands of Archie Walker, - Smith anG Others,
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
! in the case of L N Fatio vs. P Fatio ct ais and
| the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, to-wit
No. 2,267, in the case of Brownlow 81 Ross VS.
Lyon il Ramsey, trustees, &c ct ais
| No. 2,266, IN same case as next above.
No. 2065, in case of Odell & Mabry VS. Will
kns s. Freels, administrators.
No. 2066, IN same case as NEXT above.
n. ,943, IN case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
vs Chuschwell & Armstrong
| No. !, 944, in same case as next above
No. 1896, in case of Mabry & Rule vs. Tenn
| pie Harris.
No. 1904, in some case as next above
| No. 1914, in case of Jno a Williams VS. j A
/ Mabry ct ais. .-..-H
No. 1876, in case of Jno a Williams VS. J A
Mabry ct ais.
| No. 2,270, in case of Jno L Helms ct ais vs. e
Mynatt admir-, ct ais.
| No. 2,269, in case of Jno Helms ct ais VS. g
| Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No. 2,Ol4, in case of A & G w Mabry vs.
| A Nee.
No. 2,O15, in case of A s. G w Mabry vs.
| A Nee.
No. 20l6 in case of a & G w Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. LOS, in case of j A Mabry VS. S Webb
admir-, &c.
No. LOS, in case of A Mabry vs. S Webb
admir-, &c.
No. 1,73l, in case of n Msbry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,730, in case of J A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
| graves.
No. 1,737, in case of ] a Mabry vs. james
Bell.
No. LBS. in case of j A Mabry VS. James
Bell.
No. 1877, in case of j A Mabry VS. Cowan
McClung & Co.