New-York tribune., 1872-04-23

'Coniinued from First rasc.


tao United Kingdom, and In the United states, usess
up the measure Of care standard Wicn uuot1, Ne
with each succeeding government in the circuit O ne
globe vs such core goverRmenis ordlnaily emp''
Fo.-iA II the United states have correctly inter
protcd its somewhat vague language on pse TO- honJ
BE- required the part of neutral as '"r 1rc
Gation for caiM for compensation an aoSen'c rd
nearly equivalent 10 vii ful negl sence Inc LuiSu
Stats had notice that this point woiId DC hat ia
Bcr Mestys Government. 1t had annoannEH mar ot m m
case would oc prepared partly under the iS M
eminent aud learned Pn0ict who nag 'aSntTiv Of
sisted upon It in his public WRITINGS ON in' rev fkSrc.
Great Brtiin an the American eIt"sShi NJ t~Ii,rat1rs
fore presented iCr tho consideration nv fIiny toward
them on the part Of individual nenpct IS Oh u H.,
ie3d TO- aud would account tor want OF dgeuoe oot
dertng wll negeenSe; b1t' wT ouS
i6cv 6id not and 10 not, assent 10 ITS ore tS
90 not GonSt&,G & T H. rns are required TO submit with
oit reoress to injuries OF neGtlal nceNgehce ''
rc9f f W TS hS6 case @ttemPts to narrow the inter
national dutcs Of Goycrnpent 70 INC @ rCn3I lava
rcstrluing powers conferred upon " ,t fri to
81 IA: Il oycrooks the obligation OF lhe hsurai hsui M ,U
sucn law prove inadequate for the performance OF inter
national Outies In this view" the many s,i'chHtion nf
powers in Her NjcStys Government, though n.siG, i
IN, are Irrelevant ~ measuring lis eA'ci""' o'''9"
Seath Tbc British case proposes that the liability OF
C'rg Britain To- make indemnity TO the United states
snouid be uted 80 the easi ioof nat they actively and
esnact show ny an icf naval power to PREVENT dhe
Iai,o states contend mat tucn PivpS PivpSss OF inter
h
ia..on.l OF other law.
iueroE1cAL ERgoRs CORRECTED
III Fart H. OF tho British case assumes TO give an
introductory statement Ot-FTst: Tho events "hlcn
ott,dod and followed the commencement OF the cVii
vay1n America Second: The course pursued oy Great
Britain in relation to the war. Third; Ihe course P-
suoi by other maritime powers IN Ieialoh 'HcIe'o'
r., III assumes 70 give statement on lnteIhailghal
it an duties o. tie r""rIs wAic1 were posSGsseG 10y
- nj, Nai1st, Government OF preventing uh-
i.WI coI raGnts and ne manner @ ana ia Sli VA rS
ia ar "der which tLesc powers were ere I rI s
tai.lo ,uac. now call attention only 10 some OF the li-
Cpal points OF ain, cncos IN this respect between the
cases Oi Governments.
First: Inc Uni.cd States insist that Her MNestyS
Goycrnuent is POLITICALLY aud historically ia error II tne
Sssryt' ii o e riN rat the terminated in 1895
in complete conquest Of tIe eleven Confederate
$e5n6: Fit be Intended by the statement on rage
seven that IN and soon after the month OF May ISD
nuloer o. armed hilis "tiS % w icSd the 9r
troTs 10 suppose that there any nsureent vessel
IRVINE ON lie commerce OF the United States when the
fgd or y.i en- tie Alabama escaped from Liverpool.
the United cannot too strongly protest Aat Hex
Majesty. GOVernmg nj Is III error IA IN, respect
91rd: The United states have IN their case called the
attention Of the TRIBUNAL 10 the acts o Belgium Portugal
Russia. and Prussia. wneh seem to nave Deen over
looked by the authors OF the British case IN tclr eunr
alton Of The acts OF the maritime powers IN regard 10
serve that those winch recognized the insurgents
lawful bcl-ercuis did Ouy after Grea; Biltan, he
name of Confederate states 10 tins rank, aud had mus
conferred upon them nll the su0Stantill adVahases
which they Cuuld gain from general recognition pS the
teyLnnets did net recoruze the title which the in
sur.ents had l. Tor tAc cuse.yCs. mus iOr tAaupe
tc ro. laItion OF tue Emperor OF French spoke OF
them ''stltes which pretend 10 form a eoieHCIar
ton" The cIcuars OF the Duch GOVeralnent spoke OF
the don5ud! g s tstinr ciFcuns,ance in the
United states o America :" anu the Brazilian circular
,sAlTtsyy state; '' The Confederate states Lave ~
toura Il is stated on page % that :" by the United
srcs cruisers the ports and waters of Her Mucstys
nc"Is more frequently than 10y vessels the Conled
tS@te States If t tbs it isincnded 10 imply that
having regard to TIE great disparity OF numbers between
the vessels Uniied States and those OF the insur
gents the United States enjoyed 10 an equal extent WIN
the Insurgents the hosIi,a9es OF the b'Sn 81 loris' c
EXTENDED with an impartial neutrality 10 e"eu' 'he
United states eniphatcaily deny it.
Government OF the United states 10 understood 70 com
made object IrohibitoTy LEGISLATION; mat IN few
countries or IN none according to the information recIy
directly prohibit such acts or make any definite lfo0sl
gan except the United states and Great Britain The
Information the United states on this point does rot
agree with That Of Her M1esty's Government. Ihey
EOnor refer the Tribunal to CONCERN
m tie laws Of Austria Begun, Denmark france lta,
NorWay, wicD Will bo found IN the fourth appendix at
Ts This document will De found a. the close Of the third
volume the british ndix aud IN the fourth vol
iSs Tfey io refer 10 tie document aud
with submit ted regarding the laws several powers in
traty Ii VIII appear from al ths evidence t9at avis
such Of which the United states complain, have
widely iaade Ihe subject OF positive ana
tuat III no country except Great Britain 80 iaT & as lne
ceedngs under tue municipal or local laws are tie
measure or AcuIal ODAGalOns to""Iu otheI OO'e4H'
Sll: On page 25 it is stated with reference to the
adopted y tie Executive oithe United sa;os to rsstrn
enttTpIIscs-the fitting out OF fIench
pr f1ed SITE TetI to the recollection
Of the Tribunal that the French Minister OF that day
contepdcG that his Government denied the right to com
from OF the treaty OF l77S between France
and the United states, treaty made AT a tine "nen
rrrressiye measures OF President Washington
under sensc OF The duties Of the United states
as d neutral under the laws OF nations and IN the lace
OF their particular duties under the treaty "a, as
Ibbott now Lord Tenterden, which viii be
G9uud in the Briiish appendix at TIE end OF volnme
u the 4th OF August, which were the measures
adopted by the Executive, referred to IN the British
q was that the system of privatecIiug geneI
Yy speaking, suppressed; though cases seemed to nave
kGe uried until the ARRIVAL OF Mr Genets successor Al
commission he had granted TO pflVateers.
iereR: The remark pages 26, ~ and %, regarding
tie manner in which the United States different
tues performed their duties n Neutral nation toward
1 oGI ny Sl tenncn Gten Of Her Mesiy Govern
To cast reprOach on the OONtfHcAl Or people
fr Limited states They are, however. apparently III
r. sauced for the purpose inducing the arbtraOrs TO
s ,jue that UnIcd States at some or all Of these
~ = dd fa 10 the diligence for the suppression OF
- a .e expcdItiOus from their shores which ought to
la been exercised and which is required by the rues
o. ~ Tre..fy OF Washin gtOn The United States would
y xL such an InIatatIOn a reproach, however IN
toIG ly Its authUrt. They have, therefore, deter
mn, to ask arDitiat0rs 10 examine the niI her
sv, S4a these points, which they have tie honor
to IN Ait here with although they cannot hut recognize
tLa a6bjtratOrs may Justly etI that nether party
pnen ad 10 tAcir arduous labofs by tue lntioG9c-
- y, statements and evidence wholly foreign to the
slIuutCU 10 Their decision. Inc cNluthce 10"
suiu a. ~ the United States regarding the perform,
s1c. of theT international duties - vOuinlnJus ana
a series OF years and variety OF lhCldebts
n ie tJIle contest between Spain ana her colonies;
10 Ir VA .Letwecn Brazil aud the Artigas Government
To- The sr, ses Of the Cui ns for Independence; to the
War betwt tpun aud the South American Republics,
b. o4%ean var M m ,ltod an 'IsSe States con to
IIr.serye 4 sW Neutrality under d.ihcuit circutn