The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-08-06
umup STATES DISTINCT ctuar-s saHxauPTcy.

YESTERDAY, IN the matter OF william n. Dickinson
and James -. John, Judge Biatchford dismissed
he petition with costs, because 10 was not orougnt
IN the real name Of owners Of certain acceptances.
Mortgages and the Rights Of Bankrupts.
In the natter OF Raymond s. Perrin and Isaac A.
aanec. Bsnkrupts-Judge Blatchford has pro-
nounced decision In this case. He says there can
% no doubt that the mortgage TO Coerd is void as
sespecfs the provision In n covering .he stock OF
aouldlngs and lumber and all renewals thereof at
Jersey City. and .'the stock OF moudings and
renewals thereof nom time 10 timen at
New York. But It does not follow that the inva-
iIdty Of this provision renders the mortgage void
a. respects the property other than the mouldings
and lumber. A respects such other property the
consideration OF the mortgage was q present one
garded a. having no validity whatever untl il was
blcd, az against creditors OF the mortgagors rep
resented BY the assignee in bankruptcy, yet 1t was
fled both In New York and New Jersey before the
petition in bankruptcy was filed. The title Of
The assignee relates back only to the
%ay eSense transfers made enpSsn IN. ne
bankrupt In fraud Of his creditors, yet there Is
nothing to show that the mortgage to Collerd con.
sidered az mortgage OF the property other than
the mOuldings and lumber was one In fraud of the
creditors OF the mortgagors, even though not made
the mortgage was filed only the day before the pcti-
ton In bankruptcy was filed, the conclusion cannot
discriminating the transaction by fling the mort.
rage intended a fraud ON the act or had reason
s 1S ses That sTs on Ss act s
Than mouldings and lumber covered by the mort
gage to Collerd must be applied on the amount due
bn that mortgage. with respect to any proceeds OF
Woods is lien must he applied on that mortgage
az the first lien on such proceeds.
bankruptcy Calendar for This Day.
Judge Blatchford win sit to-day, and the following
thirty involuntary cases in bankruptcy are to
come before him for hearing
Robinson vs. Godefroy and others.
PiersOn vs. Jones.
Devoe We. Roller.
HOtchkiss vs. Cohen.
Desbow vs.. The Lodi Print Works.
Bissicks vs. Hobbs and Hubbard.
Beekman VS.. Baldwin and others.
The Mechanics Mills vs.. Tile Lodi Print Works,
The Mechanics Mills vs. Piney.
Granville Nicholson ct al. VS.. The Lodi Print
Works.
Weller ct al. vs. Joseph W. Cummings.
Pickhardt ct al. vs.. The Lodi Print Works.
George w. Brown vs. Michael Hughes.
Loomis VS.. f. N Martin and Albert King.
ClarksOn VI. The Tobacco Manufacturers Assocl-
tion
Halsey ct al. vs.. Martin A. Smith.
Shumway ct al. VS., Caroline Solomon.
Gibbs vs. Book and others
Brill va. KrOm.
Bamberg ct al Vs. Posner.
p warner ct al. VS.. Allen.
Washington A. Connolly vs. william B. Allen.
Hitler ct al vs.. Schreier.
Bosworth ct al and Henry G. Folger VS.. Mary Nc
Andrews.
Newwitter ct al. VS.. Schreier.
Mabie, Murray 4 Morgan VS.. William Clarendon.
H. @. Norton ct al. Vs. Slagle.
Alfred H. Smith ct al. ve. Berry GuthTnan.
Fowler We. Floyd Brown.
Koch Vs. Schuster
vhase ct oil. vs.. Hesthal lingerie.