The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-05-06
FOLLY OF THEIR DELEGATION.
They Will Have a Separate Nomina-
tiOn---HeadrickS or Gf0eSbeck.
scHURzA AND THEMISsOURIANs
The Modern DemOsthenes Behind
the Curtain.
HOSTILITY OF THE GERMANS.

CHICAGO, May g. 1872.
There is aboutsan equal quantity Of profanity
and ievity mere eFer the result OF the Cincinnati
Conventoh. Not more than half OF the forty-two
delegates, from Illinois will vote for the ticket.
Senator lDoontale and few other democrats
sallowtt with wry faces but the large majority of
repudiate 1t, and declare they will not
cote for two or the radical abolitonists in the
repuh ltcan party, and demand democratic nom-
tnat on. They are already canvassing for candl-
datey who will be more conciliatory, and
desire to nominate ticket for which
the liberal republicans vote, such as
Adams and Doolttle, or Davis and Cox, in case
Greeley withdraws in favor Of Grant, as they be-
lieve he will. The more aggressive democrats de-
mand straight nomination, such as Hendricks or
Groesbeck There is Disgusting the fact that the
regular republicans perfectly satisfied with the
Cincinnati nominations and platform, and do not
believe Grant will lose five States, whether the
ticket Is withdrawn or not.
$40 THE ILLINOIS DELEGATION DENOUNCED
The nomination Of Greeley aud Brown is charged
by the liberals upon the folly OF the Illinois dele
gates, who furiously denounced in consequence.
There It's no doubt that either Davis or Trumbu
could have been nominated II Illinois had been
united. Cassius NJ Clay, for Kentucky; Warmoth
for Louisiana, and Julian for Indiana, besought
SWEET and White to heal the Illinois division, and
promised ito vote their States solidly for either in
such case Hostiaties had gone too far; both
sides were angry and vociferously declared they
would divide to the end. After the withdrawal OF
Brown Missouri would have rebuked his treachery
by voting soldly for Trumbu or Davis If Illinois had
been united. Davis, in Washington has checked
for $4,000 to cover the expense of the canvass.
Notices. than fifteen hundred men went to Cincn-
naai at mis- expense from this State
AN INSIDE vIEw-SCHURz's PERSUASIVE ELoQUENCE.
The Post correspondent here makes the following
expose OF the manner In which Schurz tried to
counterfeit Browns influence with the Missouri dele
gstaon before the second ballot was taken. Brown
he cousin Of Frank Blair, and both are jealous Of
TIE attachments and prominence Of Carl Schurz.
The feeling is cordially recprocated At this juno,
ture, and before the second ballot was taken, Car
Schurz vacated the chair and called George w.
Julian occupy 1t. He followed the Missouri DELE
cation into a side ROOM and vigiant reporter
followed Schurz. He addressed the delegation at
some length and with great earnestness, in opposi
ton to- the transfer of their vote to Greeley. He
told them that Greeley was thoroughly
impracticable man; that the Germans would
never vote for him, because OF the tempe
rSnce principles which he had made so
oonspicuously o@lous; that, though ne was q warm
spected him highly and esteemed him, he knew
that Greeley had personal eccentrcities and lido
syrcracies which would make his nomination ter
r1bly udicrous and absurd. He besOught the dele
Ration to cast their votes for some statesman who
would not only win their votes, but who would dis
charge in an able manner the duties Of President If
elected.
The Missourians then went back to their places
ard cast twenty out of their thirty votes for Adams
and Davis amid loud cheers.
GERMAN HOSTILITY TO THE NOMINATIONS.
Mr.. Schurz's estimate of the hostility Of the Ger
mans seems to be confirmed, OF least by the sent-
ment of the Chicago Germans. Governor Koerner
OF this State chairman Of delegation, like Judges
Hoadley and Mathews, OF Ohio, repudates the
ticket and declares that it is ncomprehensible how
convention Of SO many distinguished men could
prove such failure. All the signs in this city indi
cate that the democrats win repudiate the ticket
and that it has demoralized and scattered the re-
publican insurgents
THE CHICAGO PRESS.
The Tyaes sneers ut the ticket and ridicules oil
Thought OF the democrats supporting It, The Trio
,e OF this morning reviews it favorably at length,
butthe article is noticeable for not saying word
faysrable to either OF the candidates. 1t merely
denounoes Grants administration and proclaims
the certainty OF Greeleys election. 1t adds:-"The
defeating him is In the democratic party that that
party will nominate candidate is improbable and
Irrational as II Will not accomplish the purpose.
Though there be democratic candidate, the whole
country oof democrats and republicans will under
stand the game, and they will know that the
NEXT PRESIDENT MUST BE GRANT OR GREELEY.
Everysvotesgsyen for Hancock will be a vote for
Grant, and there is democrat so obtuse as not to
know this fact end vote accordingly. There is not
q democratic lea der who does not know that in no
event will a democrat be elected The republicans
will efeotRally prevent thai that in whatever
condition of affairs the choice lis Greeley or Grant
provided the latter is not set aside at Philadelphia
G0Ecrnor Palmer's Estimate.
SPRISGFIELD, ILL.,, May 8, 1872.
The Springfield state Register, In a hading ed
torial heartily endorses the platform and nom
necs OF the Cincinnati Convention. Governor Pal
rner saws Greeley and Brown will receive $4,000 re-
4 ratifYcatiop meeting by the liberal republicans
and emocrats will be held here tomorrow evening.
tyVill the DenaecraJc Con ventlon Endorse
the CSncin natl Tick6tf
ST. LOUIS, May s, 1872.
The Times says II will support the Greeley and
Brown ticket cheerfully by laboring for an en- |
d0rsement of their candidacy by the democratic |
National Convention, believing they can be
elected, .snd expresses the belief that not
onV will the Democratic party endorse the