Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1872-03-04
Legal NOTICES.
AtRules held in the {

" lkGlNlA: AT Rules Reld IN the CLERK
Y Office of the Corporation Court of the city
of Alexandria, on the 9Th day of February, 1872
Richard H. Rudd, plaintiff, against A. j. Hte,
Virginia Hite, Reuben Johnston s. Dealham
and Peyton Bartlett, defendants. In chancery.
The object of this suit is to recover of the de-
PENDANT, Virginia Hite, wife Of A. j. Hte, the
sum OF S25. 50, with interest from July Is, 1869,
till paid, and to attach the interest of Virginia
Hite in the house and lot at the northwest corner
of Prince and Henry streets, and in the house
and lot on the north side of Prince, between
Water and Fairfax streets, numbered 81, ana 70
Peyton Bartlett and S. Dealham to the SAID VAR
ginia Hite. 1y
Kite, not having entered their appearance
Assembly and the rules of this Court, and it
appearing by affidavit that they are not residents
OF this State it is ordered that thesad defendants
appear here within one month after due publica-
ton of this order, and do what is necessary to
protect their interests in this suit; and that copy
Of this order be forthwith inserted in the Alex
andria Gazette, q newspaper published IN the
city of Alexandria, once week for four success
sive weeks and posted at the front door of the
Court House of this county Gov a COZ copy, , teste
d.. Smoot, D. q. feb l0-w4w
VIRGINIA: In the Clerks office of the Cor
Y poration Court of the city of Alexandria,
on the 18th day of January, 1872: George b.
Cochran (and such persons us may choose to
join as plaintiff and contribute to the costs and
expenses of this suit) plaintiff, against Jane
Thomas, widow and administering OF the estate
and Mary Ellen Major his wife; Joshua Thorn
as, u. M. Monroe James T. Young and Emma
Young, his wife, Alice Thomas, b. George
Thomas, Ada Thomas and Florence Thomas.
defendants: In chanoery.
/ The object of this suit is to recover from the
defendants the amount ofiudgment obtained by
tie plaintiff against Jane Thomas administra-
trix of Benjamin Thomas, deceased, for the sum
of twelve hundred and forty-two dollars and
sixty-seven cents, with interest thereon from the
18th day of April 1858, and costs, Sl5 43 also
costs of District Court of Appeals, S33 II; ana,
further to obtain decree referring the accounts
of Jane Thomas administrative of the estate OF
Benjamin Thomas, deceased, to a master com
missioner for settlement, and directing said
commissioner to take an account and report the
| debts due and outstanding from the estate of
Benjamin Thomas, deceased and decree for Il
sale Should it be necessary of the real estate of
which the SAID Benjamin Thomas died seized, or
so much thereof as may be sufficient to satisfy
the debts due from said estate.
| The defendants, Joshua Thomas and John Ma
jor and Mary Ellen Major, his wife, not having
entered their appearance and given security ac-
cording to the act of Assembly and the rules Of
this Court, and it appearing by affidavit that they
are not residents of this State, it is ordered that
after due publication of this order, and do what
is necessary to protect their interests in this suit
| and that copy of this order be forthwith in
serted in the Alexandria Gazette, newspaper
| published in the city of Alexandria, once week
for four successive weeks, and posted at the front
door of the Court House of this county. a copy,
teste: MORTON, MAR4E, Clerk.
Francis L. Smith, p q. feb 8-w4w
VIRGINIA: At Rules held in the Clerks
Y Office of the Corporation Court of the city
| of Alexandria, on the 9Th day of February, 1872:
Isaac NJ; Veitch and Sarah, his wife, plaintiffs,
against John a. Veitch and Clarence c., his
and Mary ", his wife; Elizabeth NJ: Eeitch
Silas Veitch and Rebecca, his wife, and Daniel
A. Veitch, defendants. In chancery.
The object of this suit is to obtain decree for
the partition or sale of the real estate of which
William Veitch died seized, amongst the devil
sees of the said William Veitch, or their repre-
sentatives.
The defendants, John A. Veitch and Clarence
c., his wife; Sias Eetch and Rebeccs, his wife,
and Daniel A. Veitch, not having entered their
appearance and gwen security according to the
act of Assembly and the rules of this Court,
and it appearing by affidavit that they are
not residents of this State, it is ordered that the
said defendants appear here within one month
after due publication of this ORDER and do what
and that copy of this order be forthwith insert
ed in the Alexandria Gazette newspaper pub
lished in the city of Alexandria, once week for
four successive weeks, and posted at the front
door of the Court House Of this city.
A copy, teste MORTON MARYE, Clk.
A. s. G. E. Stuart, p q. feb 7-w4w
VIRGINIA: At Rules held in the Clerks
Y Office of the Corporation Court Of the city
of Alexandria, on the 9Th day Of February, 1872:
David Lescallet, plaintiff, against w. W. Swain
and Robert Bell, jr., administrator of George
Swain, deceased, defendants In chancery and
upon an attachment.
The object Of this suit is to recover of the de-
PENDANT w. W. SWAIN the sum of S24a with
interest till paid and to attach the interest of said
defendant, in the personal estate of his father,
George Swain, deceased, in the hands of Robert