Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-23

4 - PV-OS. SIOoSIIIS L10 center OF q sink in
20 post oak, thence south 80 east 96 noio ned
the beginning, containing one hundred de- o %
more or less, being the same tract of land t VIZ
on the 9tn day Of March, 1866, BY da".ossOi d
tneyCnancery Court of Knox county. and Of
- n na4ry oecame the purchaser; sale cons..ss
4 1867. 49, - SNaueery Cont
a certain tract or parcel ofland, II tba
y, OF Anox, second Civil District, bonndoe 9an-
follows; beginning at q small post oal u oo as
VILE . - HoWeIrs line, thence with HowelP. rner
north ~ deg. and 80 min. west 50 noIoS eli line
the spring branch to double black os er.99sSlng
north x deg. and 30 min. east Al noIG'n enee
small walnut, thence north 20 west 81 ne, 70
small post oak thence north 45 east n poI To-
stake, thence north 40 east "a poles 70 - Ioa
thence south 80 east 81 poles to stake al sIake
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs Moraaaop pom;
Howell to the beginning, containing o6e gu L and
dred acres more or less being the sanoo nun
conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Ann 5 1Tact
vannes,. and registered in Book 4. Vol Ina
oSy, IN the keglster 3 Once Knox. county. P'ss
OF Knox and State of Tennessee. bonnJo9 uty
follows: beginning at a stake pole east Of 81, as
mead OF spring, in the gap of ridge and o .ue
ner With the VIM. Swan farm, thence son,S ~
west Az poles to pine and black oak sapnI;D ~
thence south II west % poles 10 a MOI
thence north SO west 1913 poles TO n b;oE UaA'
eusn, thence north so east So poles TO boa{
oaE, thence north 81 west l46 poles tn TacA
TaA, tnence north 81 east 104 poles to a hieIor-A
onene ce soutn 80 poles to small hickory, tbepSo
east ~ poles to post oak, thence south a aaSs
lSS poles to stake, thence south IN NO.. ea 81
poles TO walnut stump, thence soutb AZ oo. 20
poles to the beginning containg two br 49,
acres more or less. being the same tract conTo5
ea 70 1o 5sss 4a6ry; on the 4th day of Sen.
tered in Book A, Vol. 8. page $50 ~ anu regis
The following lots in Nelson Svon & MI,
addition TO KNOXVILLE, to-wit: Nos - o. %
90 SO, q 60 81 62 g. 60, g. So, Io4 los s. los
oelng sixteen en- Lots; also Lot 4 in KennedvSs'
bry's Flint Hill addition to KnoxvilIe fror, ma
/ to Sc inclusive. ''Oii NO
The following lots in Nelson. Swan & N,
brys addition to Knoxville, to-wit:
LIST Range South, Nos: 80, 81, 1O7, no 127
$50. 13l, !34 49, lS3, 1872 129, I2S, 100, los III
112 IL, ia 12s 12i rs, 126, II, % 3 SS i5 %
119, 40, I21, ID - 90 ~
ID Range South, 43, "a, 63, GA. 155 Ia IN
156, al, l42, 151, 20, 153, I54, so. i0''
lst Range North, %, 81, ITO, 100, ia Ill u3
129, 40, 135, 1S6, 49, 1SS, p, 10 %. n as q
40, los, 49, 124, 125, 126. - % o.
I'd Range North, 81, SO, 81 40 Isl. 159 1;a
l5d, l53, l56, l5E 15S, 139, AZ, 14S, 40 80 I5
160, 16l, 162, g. SO, 49, ~ iO'
0t acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
OF knox county, and described March / 1S6J
as beginning on spanish oak, running theme
north 4o deg. and l51 min east I87 poles thcncs
west pole to post oak stump, thence sontb "a
deg. west l69 poles, thence south 10 east ~
poles TO stump, thence to the beginning
being a part of the original Flint Mi
tract and being all of said tract living North Of
James Bells, now ThOs Champion's nronar.
ty, belonging to S A Whites estate. and bain,
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabry bT
John Williams and J j Craig. executors If
Sam A White March l, 1862 by deed reSysfe VI
ed IN the Registers Office of Knox ceunfv- in
Book A. Vol. Sd, page 401.
10 acres of land lying in the I'd civil district of
Knox county and bounded and described rs
follows, to W.T.: Beginning at a stake on the
FAIR Grounds fence, running thence s CD + II
poles with said fence, thence S AZ T. IA poles
with said fence, thence S 40 E poles with said
fence, thence S % E 81 poles with said
fence, thence N 90 E 13l poles to stake corner
70 MaDry and Howell, near the branch,
thence North % East with Mabry's
line Al poles to a stake, Mabry' g corner, thence
north % west Al poles with Mabry's line. 10 a
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake.
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book Z.
Vol. Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4. and 6, as designated upon the
map OF the kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court of Knox county. in the case of
F. w. Vanuxem and wife VS.. james Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to jos. A.
Mabry by ID. A Deaderick G. & NJ, Nav 7tb,
1865 by deed registered in the Registers Office
OF IA knox county, in Book E. Vol. 8, page $40
Inc foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 98l acres of land lying in the 10Th civil
district OF knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
same Iunss conveyed to said George w Mabry and
by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county in Book Y, Volume 2, page 243,
and dated May 8, 1858. Said land adjoins the
lands of Archie Walker, = Smith anC, Others,
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co.
In the case of l. M Fatio vs. Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, tO-wit
No. 2,267, in the case Of Brownlow s. Ross VS.
Lyon q Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
. No. ZZ66, In same case as next above
No: 2O65 in case of Odell 81 Mabry VS. Will
kiDs & Freels, administrators
No. ZO66, IN same case as neNt above
N. 1,943, in case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
VS. Chusehwell & Armstrong.
No VA, IN same case as next above
No: l,6Oo, in case of Mabry & Rule Vs. Tenn
pie Harris.
Nc. 1904, in some case as next above.
No. l,9l4, in case of Jno A Williams VS. A
Mabry q ais.
No. 1,S15, in case of Jno A Williams VS. A
Mabry ct ais. e
No. 2,27O, IN case of Jno z Helms ct ais VS. g
Mynatt admir-, ct ais
No. 2,269, in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais VS. G
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
No. 2Ol4, in case of j A & G w Mabry vs. c
a Nee.
No. 2015, in case of A & G w Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. 2o16, in case of \ sc w Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. Los, in case of A Mabry VS. T Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. ], 7O6, in case of j A Mabry VS. T Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. 1,73l, in case of J A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,730, in case of j A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,737. in case of J A Mabry VS. james
Bell.
No. 1888, in case of J A Mabry VS. james
Bell.
No. 1897, in case of j A Mabry vs. COwan,
McClung & Go.