The Tiffin tribune. (Tiffin, Ohio) 1868-1887, 1872-07-25

= szizI-zsz l'lszE s-.izszzSss=s'lEzzS
EoGATIo sET1-0UE 20 LEwI5 CAE1UCHAEL.
August OF September, ISL. De-
clining to advocate then the payment
Of rebel pensions. Mr.. Carpenters
affidavit.
HORACE GEEELET 10 LEwrs CARMICHAEL
August or September, Is71. Declar-
ing in favor Of law giving pensions,
by the United States, to the rebel SOL
dIers, though doubling Congress, etc.
[ Affidavit Of Mr.. Carpenter.l
LEwTs CAE,uCIsEL To HORACE GREELEY.
September, fS7I. Addressing Hor-
ace Greeley as ''next President of the
United States - and asking MIN to be
the candidate Of the Democrats and
all dissatisfied men. Carmichael gave
his views about politics. Statements
Of Carmichael.
HORACE GaEELET TO LETIs CAs,uCHAI.I-.
October I, IS71. Deprecating Dem
ocratic failure TO nominate Chase in
1865, against Republicans setting
Chase aside for 1872, as feeble and
broken down. proposing united ac-
tion to ''ciOse the wounds opened by
the war" saying he could not see his
way quite clearly 10 1872. Already
published in part by Us, and further
certified to by affidavit of DIR. Ire
land
HORACE GREELEY TO LEWIS CARMICHAEL
October, 1871. Inviting Carmichael
to call on Greeley in New York, to
talk over issues, etc, and expressing
possibility that he might consent to
be a candidate. Statement of Carmi-
chael who testiiies Greeley fully con-
sented), statement of II. II. Howard,
and affidavit Of Mr.. Carpenter.l
IIoEATIO sETgOUE TO LEWIS CARMICHAEL.
About December, 1871. Referring
to interviews of Greeley and Carmi-
chael, and Carmichael and Sewn our;
expressing satisfaction with the pro-
gress of affairs acceding to Carmi-
chaeps plan Of nOn-cOmmittal tariff
issue, and commencing Greeley's ac-
ceptance of the plan as looking to the
end. statement of Carmichael and
affidavit of DIR. Ireland. Carmichael
asserts SeymOur's subsequent full
agreement to support GTeeley.l
HoEATIo SEYMOUR TO WALDO HUTcnINs.
About February, 1872. Seymour
had been unable to see Hutchins, ac.
cording to Carmichaels request, and
50 wrote TO him. Contents of this
letter best known to Seymour and
Hutchins. statement Of 3. +. Ar
mold, Esq.l
UORATIO SEYMOUR TO LEWIS CARMICHAEL.
About February. Statement of
these facts TO Carmichael. statement
of b. 4. Arnold, ESD.
HORACE GREELEY To LEWIS CARMICHAEL.
About February, 1872. Suggesting
that Democratic influence should be
exerted for Greeley at Cincinnati, and
that Carmichal should go there. Af-
Gdavit of DR.. Ireland, and statement
Of Henry Van Dusen.
HORACE GREELEY TO LEWIS CARMICHAEL.
April, 1872. Suggesting that it was
not polite yet to undertake an inde-
pendent movement for Greeley in
| OtsegO county, as Carmichael had
| proposed. Statement OfR. w. Court
ney1
HORACE GREELEY To LEWIS CARMICHAEL.
Doubling whether the Democrats
would really favor him, and propos-
/ ing to Withdraw from the candidacy,
but persuaded by Carmichael to wait
and see. statement Of Carmichael.
LEWIS CARMICHAEL To REUBEN f. FENTON
About March. InclOsing Seymour's
letter, noting what he (SeymOur) had
written to Hutchins. b. F. Arnold.
HORACE GREELEY TO LEWIS CARMICHAEL
Stating the result of the Seymour.
Fenton correspondence "all right" "
| Howard.
| HoRATIO SEYMOUR To LEWIS CAEsIICBEL.
May l, 1871. Stating correspond
| ence about the Cincinnati convention
/ las Carmichael eXplains). Substance
Of letter already published on our au
thOrity.l
HOEATIO SEYMOUR TO WALDO HUTCHINs'
April. 1872. Contents known t,
Seymour and Hutchins. Stated by
! Carmichael to be final arrangement
for Cincinnati convention. AcknOwl
edged in SeymOur's letter to Carmi
chael of May l. Affidavit of Sey
mour's acknowledgment, if challeng
! ed.]
WALDO HCTCHISs To HOEATIo SEYMOUR.
Or or before May l, 1872. Content
best known to Hutchins aud Sey
mOur. SeymOur's letter says tn
reply of Hutchins was pleasant, o
satisfactory. Acknowledged in Sey
mour's letter to Carmichael, of Ma
l. Affidavit, if challenged.l
\ SECOND CHALLENGE.
We had intended to make a review
Of the case we present to-day; bu
time and space do not admit of il
We think all dOubters will cOnced
that the case speaks for itself.
The responsibility for disproOf il
now placed. Small talk and half way
denials are no longer in order. If Mr.
Greeley, or Seymour, or Hutchins il
misrepresented, we invite him to APP
peal to the courts. Let him sue Y
for libel, or slander. We will under
take to prove as much better cas-
than we now present, as the case w
have made is better than that W.
promised. Dare they answer thi
challenge? We propose that they try
POSTSCRIPT.
The following paragraph from thr
1fjbRue, of yesterday, which we haC
missed in our daily glance at that pa
per, is called to our attention, as W,
7 go to press:
"The Binghamton Republican ha
for some weeks endeavOred to Obtain
a notice from this journal by a series
of fabrications which have not ever
the small merit of plausibility. !
has from day to day pretended that i
would support its charges by letter!
which it has repeatedly threatened t.
produce but still withhOlds. In VaiT
has its ally, the Evening Post, urged
it to produce its evidence or cOnfes!
itself mistaken. Print your letters
or acknowledge your slandersI"
This journal has been "noticedn
very often by Mr.. Greeley, in the TTi
bune, during the year past; and the
/ lesser lights of that paper, in assum
ing to "nOtice" us, are guilty of al
. D