Daily national Republican. (Washington City [D.C.]) 1870-1872, 1872-02-26

which Is one OF general interest came mn for
befnra ali ths i,d,o. ~ ,ho nj
\, >, 49, = - y wv ~,
flc' some "e9k' since, aud was reserved TIL
Saturday last for decision.
The case was that of Alexander aud others
,,,0,,., AZ. ni.,.I., - r.,,,,,,Li. a .,
's"'n'' 'ue D'suo' VI No'unhpla' " AppoN
from the decision OF Judge Wylie that the
District government had no right TO tax
oa,on, os,oo .,,oroo,.
','' -
OPINION OF TuE COURT.
Mr. Justice Humphreys delivered the opln
lon Of the court, reversing the decision below
81 a.oI,.,,,, a. =, A., -, "a 40 t,,I,di,
uN '"e' ''o .Ou' "eu ~ SUI
uOn In tue case because tno persons upon
whom the tax was levied had complete and
full remedy al law. Tho following Ia the
oninIon In mil,
o.--,t-.. - III. -, - A..
S n,l oI po,.y' oa ,ts1Psd,eney, cannot
~ ueSein,nou Vy .no Juu,O,M uephtthent OF
lno sO'I' uuiynl ~ unSvt OpPosiuoh 70 the
ue Sw,.I a'' ','l W .' tnV IeglslaNe'
Al, "non We oVtne 70 con,loer tne question OF
t an power ~ tne legisINYe department 70
eepLne eiuhon 0I an hnaoltant on tne
AN, y VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ., iu.ernst,onh
iisnS .ue Sou,ts may IesiuhA'ey pronounce
upon tne question. ,
Al " ooeolnes ma'etial, noWeyer, 20 ooserye
aue plVIe. 'noae VI sesHuk sne Igns OF tns
s ,,t ~ p,Vcesu agaiust 'ne inu''iouh
Tha III ~ oI H., ns i IrUpsy t .,,
me wiz OF injunction may issue against
inalvldna,s 70 restrain them from proceeding
uuuoI Soo. y, nw skIust tne piaintn OF
~ ..,i ~ nnon oeiohuaut c,alhs tne rlyht
,,,'' ~ 4. $3.50, " ~ unioss VIC
=, ias y. ia ~ In, y, ..,sg mi. ~ su,,
~ ,Sa, ,.Ih,',.si VI P'"'"'A' i"''J e-e''eu
Jul .nat uiV ~ M, ,. an -,-,-,
.aa',", Nv ~, - .u,,, SOn anu
n ~, L
1880, w ~, ~ "a n'e assos ~
ospaes' anI uae huo" y. Ieineues MN
naver c rem o maj T NJ, ' rsnda.-
RSy -, . ~. ,hs .s, my en. feuue.-
- Tn3,,u W ane sOus os eqy Ior "
,.ns III, ~ p,yl,S, "uu pus
taSn.,a. y, ,'a',iiars h..a,n o s.1,.n
80 49, " - 49,. ~ gNo
anonIsI II ~, ~ ,,1 49,, ~ LII, ~
,holI,a ,hs a,,.,n, ~ III, ,a os NJ
H., r.,,,,' ~ ~ M ~, Wy
ioo,Io, ~ sha ~ ,.,,,,id yra5,,o sno ~
ioins,. a. uia ia mJS'u PLvuov Nv
,ion pni ,Ss No. nai,oo,in,, ~ so ,iiss,si
uon, nut sse nnoln eoieo ~, y, en hIekai
s " uoeS NOV PIpHuGc, IN 'ne e1ntenPIati,on
~ a,,i4 80, ~ sto W
~ ~ NV Nouiu ~. tue Iucston 81 VIC Iigns o.
t ny uSN \, ,Gs 70 'ne .a, apu tns Ih
1'Ia, "ou n ~ HospIsSs ior an otneeI 70
M ~, " auI Pla,h evu'u I1e".ol " noni
a.. "a
80 -, ~ ~ s NVu'u
,,sss an ~ wy parry iroui "holi 'n0 iiieBN INK
N.t,hH. 1, A.. -. A., Al. ..,.t..to
L,1'n ~ ~, eau - W sa,u that Wy R'an'lI
nIu'1 W ioce1 W lgsoIt 70 nultlPhcity OF
sun .I 70 ueteIlnlne us nRnts, IoI onS action
- in'.Ii,,,s ~ ~ Sii, W Hs.e ~. I tug ISSUE
VI VI IIPIy 49,, sun ~ eluiyi
rnns, sha,e ~ indtsIdnai S,hIan,Ion "
i''I',,IiNi' " i,u ~ ~ W y
muitlpUcity OF buls 70 justly resort 70
equity on that ground.
Each complainant In this case may assert
Iaw ~ Sn sc sI If. np VII ~ ToTs r o.
shIo ,hat ~ 1, ~. !, ~ ,hs a.t.,aaa, a.
inao,n, IA a., nv, ~ = MI s ~,
tho collection Of il could moi RI renSIreJ
then either or ali of Inc compIaInants might
ask the Interrogation Of the writ oflniunctIon.
In the case of DAVIS vs.. CITY of Chicago,
II Wsiiacc ins tha rim i, az ori,InaI ~,
-. h.,S',,, 10 ~, tue o,,I ~ SUI
tbo cnlieciinn y, a tSV ieyIsd hy ,be ci,v ~
CbIcsgo nnnn shares ~ ths canItaI .tocI ~
tha ITnIon Sa,ianai bsnt 81 SlbIas,,o ,S,"rs u
Nv Nh, 1'"''A ''IN' VI S"''~so' '""eU
No snecIaI cIrcuu.ta,cos uera alIo,.d Il,
.rnnnrt nj IN. conI,abic inr,.Jic,,on "a ,ha
coprT, bnt n General ~ronnd was toIen ,h s
ths ,av "a ii1sgsi rSnsslh,Ii va hrn,,,,S,
Nv the hank ItscI alleging in addItlon ~
,Se iiiegalitv nj m, taT t6at irrenarshIs in,
inrv wenId he done 10 bank md sharehoIdsr.
IL hs shsres wcrs nermItted ~ h. ola All
,h wy ,ha ba NJ" n.Id .ha 49, ~ o'S Sn ~
snhiscted IN a muitiniiriIy ~ sni,s
T'ho CircvI, Cnnrt snstainsd ths dem,rror,
IN botb bIIls dIsmIssed tbe snits and thr
Srnrs,,,o c,,,r, aii,rmcd The J,crnes "'' ''''
3Ipon t6e case Of tbe origInaI bIIl the eour,
p,es thIs IanVung.,
a. ..nu,,nT ,ha,.s "a ho u,.,,., A., sol, =.
40 no, thinH anT ron M ~ nras.ntsS NV IN hi
iustifyiuR the interpositIou of a oourt Of sauity
70 enioin It's collection" at must ap-
pear that the inloroement Of the tax would lead
% multiplicity tsults, or produce lrreParable
~: ME- iha , PiLop ~ GIn hora,a
,ha "a ay coY,, ~ s%rI,Y ,so ~ inxnSsa
~ S.,,.,,,-,. -, :, a.. -.
lho ioilonl lIE iIauEuase " tne SouIt may
oe Eely ProPo'ly iniPreSSou upon the ihinu'
I'm the case. where elnlty has lntertersd' 10
snS aoS ,'ng y, ,hs, ~ W., " ~
9pnd IPpn "a. my Taso ' w .no aSoi Sn OIL
~ ~ ~ -, ~. a. -
t uue rn 1S ',,I,I,iII,i,,, .ul' az
oeioio us aiesG ~, tn ~ Vi suts
may nay eIsuo, ~ WI "a E ~ Y s1e qLes-
10. 9 ~ snai ~ Wy To O, 49, ~ eJIi.y
put wy ~ 'h o "o' "'''ou TINT
car ~, Ieau W eut ii,aI y.
Lho Ou , ~ suat .no "a 49,, 70 u'oSa
anu ,uiIi las y % olaJs ~ CIV
, Lsns io, I XVI III Uss'G'S SM ' ooa
uoh, ana mat tno sGn ~ Hn lnu.a,uu ~ oue,
~ as ,u, III ri,II '''"' N"'' w 'u'
W ~, n ,,,t,,,,,ho mad.
he same Hnesa'ion III tue i my, " any
.iss iI,oa,i ia uoiS M, a,'aSS,od ,han "a
wa s ,. nolu sn ,a.,og .'', sueu. a
uosPs 'S saii,e ~, ~
P13 VI wv sti9 I,a,tHn anu
Souu hSs opUn tIG I ,nnid SsYa 70 n cur o.
eIs',y, ~ sSSsnt. MI "'u'u n"'' W 'u0 =" a'
seTt their iSa rights u,oao, and Void nD0r .rv
a,,a sao ~ ,oiioa,VoSS =, 49,, "Po ,n, Guy
ground, tue cOllecllOn OF IL, uuuer protest,