, 1872-12-19
F0LlER'S KNlCKERB0cKFR
some More Revelations Concerning +ho
manipulation of Insurance
Stock,
a neat Way Of Subscribing the Capital Of a con.
pang' and Fighting the Poliey.
Holders.
"ahEeo, A Receiver for the Kn;ckarhockon
Family Party.

y Desp1te the revelations OF the na,,.r !;
I "Aue4 accounts have been worked. and AFFAIR
t .4auou1ently managed, in relation to ban1rrn
Insurance companies, it would seem. from VIZ
.ouo"s, that there is deeper depth, new an,
> ollelia1 manner Of floating and CONDUCTING II,
BUSINESS OF insurance, not brought to Light h,
tue recent discoveries. In the matter of Ran;a.
nun " Page and William sprague Y. the Knictsr
ousAei insurance Company, Henry Fuller, and
ot1efs' q motion was nude in the Circuit Conf
De.o1e 'uoso Wllliams, for q Receiver to ba an
po,u'e" 10 the company. Messrs. shufeldt +
,An nioFea Lilo Court on behalf Of the com.
p4a4n'n's' 1or ReceiYer for the above Com-
pany. 'o oon-
Ihe bill fled alleges that the COMPANY bsd a
cap'ta1 STOCK OF s5oo,ooo, the majority Of which
aa "as subscribed and taken BY Henry Fuller. hia
! q so ~. fu1ef, and bis son-in-law Henry
..aue tnat henry Fuller paid into the treas-
49, 49, " tuo company 1000, suffered it TO re-
-aa.. a-.. snete 1or lew days, then drew out the
~ Mlnaself, on lis own property; that tie josses ~
~ 1Le company by the fire were about s5Go mn NJ
enough Fuller claims they we're ST 200 mn tbe
shoWinr thst ot aesets was made to the Auditor.
amount Of about $780, 000 Consisting or ~ ,a+t tao
e1, ensss, cash. and stock notes.-the latter to IN
amount OF $500 600; that none of tha r. ioosao sno
VIII taJaskea, nut the parties suffered to wajt
Mhen m Fuller put in defences md swora to 1nar;s,
~ ~ ~ Tue eaaea, and is now unjustly defend;n~
an suits brought against the Gornnenv. on1ins tIa
face to ba upon f.1a an affidavit which appeared on
creditors in the collection Of their de1ts nra sro
eureu tne removal Of nearly all the cases tn other
91nhes, G alleging the prejudice Of the peonla ~
fnrtho. vph county against the Company Tic bill
bnvinp ata'es ,' tnat Fuller has been engaged in
pQuG18R tHn 1
reinaea to render any statement Of its aaso+s as
aatsl aatptllt1es that when the Company was ailin-
IatEo Ea,fa a bankrupt in the United States Can't
Snnran,aP 9a prosecuted scents frivolous appeal to the
thus tied up that procaad;no osases' ana
the the creditors could d'eps' pet notbina no tnat
aetion a,so ias Fuller had recently a.
ng bis Damages sa' at ttGs@PenS ZEE o IN ths conr
,nITp peaangs 1aa IN which exhibits the fact hat he
cnianee OF the s25ooo0 without giving aay
Alr: shqfeldt read afhdavits of the crad;tora t
h921wlng TINT the aairs of the COMPANY unds
.aue aueT management we're likely to nro7uco q
afe to TO the sredors and
aps and 'g tat sae M assets Of the Company in lis
re- to the Present time, WAS manared hx Fn1a te Il
noLE N his own interest and not for fha hera' 81
aat in ohe tba beFedto5 and he further stated
represented the body Of thu dditanse cPad;4ara al
.at .as Inc case was an important one, inYoivnr
y operts ~ nnd claims to the value Of above s5oo ez
ahat the facts and the law warranted tho lit
ten1 tnra af H. OF Receiver at once, and The Ia
ealtora numbers OF whom were Door peonla ,h' br
w. W nos satisfied to leave this property in fbo re
~; aas OF man whose interest it was to defaat tn
~ s1t c4alnls ele
! alessra; Grant and Swift opposed the motion 1or
produced no af6davits to contradict tha mi
tements Of tho comp1ainants, content;nc ing
se,Tos WITH the argument TINT the Court Of Un
= atncety 1ad no Jurisdiction Of the hill ana tcs
i It could not be maintained, particularly e,a aa
- eonpia!nants u @ had not obtained auy iudg- owe
15 ns ae law, and, therefore, that no Receiyer div
~ ~ ~ appointed. 4
-. Moaroe Wnl reply for the co1nplainanta h. Of
L4o"s ! erp