The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-04-23

British case a. to the actual internal distribution d
IN er m hoSsn
P.LIIAIE !.. ny THE rooHsEss Or our Navy
Ssa 1hs Which the
diligently exeftsd their naval power prevent The
United States contend that such proposed Limitation has
other law.
Part two Of the British case assumes TO give an intro
/ The events which attended and followed the COM
management OF the civil war in America :.
The course pursued by Great Britain in relation to the
5 The pursued by other maratne Powers in
rights and duties the powers which possessed by
Her Brittanc Maiesys government Of preventing unlaw
and under which these power; were exercised during the
made, now call attention only some OF the principal
points of differences in this respect between the Of
'e WHEN THE CONTEST ENDED.
ernment i politically and hsorsay II error r. ths s0
States.
& snS s be Intended End BY e on haf
sps we're tted out and sent % sea rom ports IN
the Confederate saes lead the arbitrator suppose
@ We sG
1s sS
.AgrnoR.rlfs WHICH Would NOT HrI, HER.
una r to hys IN s fssa c
BY authors British case IN their 's Of
maritime Powers ths tribunal wi doubtless observe that
ssn Sc he Gss 's h ap pc
ta aa 70 b them Tan under n hG ns f
conferred upon them ali substantial advantages which
ss
for 1 hs s s we tie h
saoa Re E@ssrsf DC FfeSsh ssaSs y
ST N sss sss
Az" S
sr s,s,sa ws cAs y b FORGET m r,oa
'sS NJ
or Ses ssqn Sa Ss
States" II by this il is Intended to imply that having
t. sf & q S the sas
r ssd the q British ore ina;
Ma Geny TO 'a' 's
on pass d the
United States y 70 colan belong 70 class
hibtory lesi;laon thain few countries IN
acts make definite proposiiion Tor prsyentins
and anss The w, e @
Her hsssy On s a'Si icy ss
to laws refer S s Rs to rsass he he
%E i K iSe aaa a
attached K he report M, NsatrsiIty
document
Volume American evidence between pages and
with submitted rsgardns ne laws Of ssserai Powers IN
such these Of Which the United States Complain have
sSsS TSpt @ ls
eeedinss under the municipal local laws are the meas
uas q % er e ON
s0p @ssraS X The these he ai,as ou 4
ana s'rss f
10" is
Of The duties d United States neutral
SsT ns duties r aaS he In res face as
81 vi, Which w found in M me-
stated a. Sn a sn e " the publication
rules q q Aasas ~
sas s s
Ing though eases seem to have occurred red until
disavowed his act and recalled the commission he had
now AMERICA OBSERVES NEUTRALITY
the % weh he q nnsS al =
times Performed their duties as Neutral nation owar%s
@ Herr saesss
cast any reprossh the government peope e the
for The purpose inaaens the arbssors that
hostile Expeditions shslT shore; %hlsS
sn as fss1
hHe the Gs % fc% @
sst "' ssas n sS me
70 the issues submitted 70 their decision The evidence
%d n By The qns s duties Is @
al Spf sss s5 a
her colonies to the between Brazil and the Artiras
ns
republics and to the Crimean war In all these contests
ns s er Mas
government has thought ought TO call in question the
United States formed heir dats: ssss trying cir
msiRorned; that the United States did perform their
y which had They ossn msd By s na
qne united state, Ss .n unite Gs x Her mays
aa sn nd sasn Of 1 SAs Ss
q the Portuguese government, did in 1871 recomnend
osns s pcwer to 9 d
mission OF the offences; and that Congress did In comp
yc acts w't Of i a rS ss S"' '
Gnod ses as at c 70 to
what reference is Intended by the words on page
ssas d 9eFs Vessels oft Is the
United sta!es for expeditions against countries with
are well Known Vague nsnuatlons like these, without
definite statement proof furnish no iounda
ton for In The only form In which the treaty
permits the United states to defend themselves.
PROOFS.
Tsnth-The United states emphatcaliy deny the state
ment on page 2S that their prohbitory laws have been
nringed by acts much more tasranl than any OF those
charged against Great Britain They feel confident
that a fair consideration OF the proof which they have
offered, and OF that which they now offer showing the
fidelity with which they have ever performed their
international duties viii convince the arbitralors that
have honestly strenuosy, IN good iaith ana Que
diligence striven TO perform these duties
TWO LAWS
ElerenM-Thc United states think that Her Macsty's
government has been incorrectly informed regarding tho
United States statute OF 1878, commonly known as the
neutrality act II stated on page ~ that the british act
of 1919 is stringent rigorous ana COMPREHENSIVE
than that of the United States. Her Macsty's
does say in what respect the superior srin-
gency rigor OF that act is sup
posed II the British act could have been s,s-
pended by the act of the Crown, winch Is sup
posed to have been the case, II may at least
be held have furnished less permanent
aud remedies than the law OF the United States
The United States think that the qualities OF strngency.
rigor and Will be lound IN Their law
in superior degree and they call attention to The follow
ing points of comparison
.ua