Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1872-06-06
second circuit Court HaIsey, Ju,

Second Circuit Court Halsey, Judge.
To-day the following cases will be
called for trial: 1919, Woodward, trustee,
vs. Jones; 1947, Woodward, trustee, VS.
Goodman etal 1T95, Woodward, trustee,
VS. Mckinney; 1885, Candee vs. Baker;
1888, Jones vs. Edgington; 1894, Stewart
vs. Rambaut; 1895, Stillman VS. Wilkin-
! son; 1899, Hughes vs. RiOrdon; 1000,
Boyd vs Memphis City Transfer Com
psny; 3OOl, LOOney va Forrest; 2OO3,
1aski, trustee, vs BrOOkshire; 2O07,
Miller vs. Williams; zoos, Hoffman VS.
Fitzgerald; 20l2, Stack & Costello VS.
Winters; 20l6, Hughes VS. RiOrdon ct al I;
1)20, Kirkland vs Kirkland; 2022, Galena
VS. Mayor and Aldermen of Memphis;
202S, StOekley VS. Nesye; 2029, COckrell
ct al vs. Weaver; 2031, Straus VS.
Allen; 2OSS, Kiernan, by next friend,
VS. Walter ct al; 2034, Anderson VS.
Coleman ct al; 2035, Ladd vs. Mem
ken Bros; 20S6, Cannon VS. Turn
age; 2OSS, Stillman vs SchOOnOver; ;
20S9, Locket VS. Simpson; 2046, Reinhei-
mer vs. Mathes; 204S, Bass VS. ThOmp-
son; 1850, Cornell VS. Kennedy; 205l,
Koford ct al VS. Kelly; 2055, Young VS.
Jackell; 2O56, Cranberry VS. Lawless; (;
2057, Saver VS. Brown & Co; 2060,
Healey VS. Carlton; 2O62, Puryear VS.
Elder; 2O63, Risk VS. Kupperschindt; /;
2O67, Scott VS. Millard; 2O7i, Goepel VS.
Clanton; 2072, Richmond VS. Green;
2077, Key vs Reany; 2063, DrummOnd
VS. Flood; 2O9l, Thorpe VS. Hargan; 2O94,
Gillen VS. Pepilow; 210l, COnder vs. Cole
man; 2l02, Forrest vs. Pyne; 2l07, Lowell
vs. Kellogg; 2l0S, Goodwin 4 Spencer VS.
Ford; 2l10, Lehner VS. O'Durff; PHI,
Wear & Co. vs. Guest; 2lIS, Steiner
Bros. BilbOw; 2l22, Hurt VS. Griffin;
212S, Price va Griffin; 2l24, Hargan VS.
Griffin; 2l45, Filley VS. Fontaine; 2l47,
NJ. Q. & L. Caviness VS. Bran
don; 2l5l, McCleary vs. Hampshire;
2159, Cooper VS. Schemmuck; 2163, Taf-
fle 4 Mccullough VS. Chandler; '2l65,
Warren & Co. VS. Hessaur; 2166, Burns
& Smueker VS. same; 2l75, Shields, ad-
ministrator, VS.. Demmons; PIT, Ryan
VS. Mitchell; 2lS0, Hynes ct al vs. Bick-
ford; 2lSl, Schcer VS. Mount; 21S2,
Townsend VS. Good; 2lS4, SpeIlman VS.
Cash; PISS, Miller VS. League; 2l94,
Yanakay VS. Cockrel; 2195, Shock ct al
VS. League; 2lS6, Cuneo, executor, VS.
Brignarde1o; 200, Raymond VS. DeVere;
22O2, Nelson VS. County; Dos, Wool
dridge, assignee, VS. Hardwiek; 2211,
KulNdIACy No CCAlOnF ---1Of 10Olu W
Witt; 2214, City Of Memphis VS. Moore;
2222, Burford US Winters ct al; DDS,
McDougal VS. Cockren & Sons; 224l,
Boddie VS. Kratzenbera; 2245, MonsaTTat
VS. Smith; 224S, Lynch VS. Duffy; 2249,
Welch VS. Allen; 2250, BadenelH VS. Bah
ienstein ct al; 225l, Peacock, Langter &
Co. VS. Langley & Gay ct al; 2252, Can
novan VS. McLefresh; 2254, Curley VS.
Grsf.flxrir,. oo5S A laxandor US Aarnearo.
1857, Oakley vs. Kaliski; 226l, Hen
derson vs. Eddins; 2266, Carroll
ct al We MeDonough & Flannery;
2267, Hall VS. Hampstead; 1889, Crisp VS.
Madden; 22T1, Dominic VS. Brooks; 2274,
Massey VS. AIlsso; 2275, Thorpe VS. Lee;
22S2, Scott Va Ball ct al; 22S5, Brooks VS.
Ridout; 22S8, Cash VS. Apperson; 22S7,
Happeck W Mayor and Aldermen Of
Memphis; 22ss, Trowbridge & Co. VS.
Tameny ct al; 22Ol, Bugher VS. McGre-
aOn