New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1872-11-11
U.S.. SUPREME CoURT-wAsHSoroS Nov q

No. 222.-U. s. N. Justce-Appeal from the Court
e. ,G so, w., sS e % is's :ans 800 s
The Court Of Claims or ns "1o' s1
0o sssd hs ahs srms were not ssryicssb the
n .sp.a payment for the arms SIS each instead o.
the 1ose. prize. on tbs seeoaPI here Claims hat
the sample, aud that his receipt TO- zoe sun p @
j. H. Ashton for eamsnsi c. II. Hill for Government . ,,,,,
a aSu .SS cross spDss on he Court claim
for flA s which prosecuted BY BARD as ph Ts,
is locomotives for the GoVernmep ana Esrs re
tract, oTl exclusively for the Government ibis
performed The Court q Claim. found sy 'oa4 ,e'ys y.
and Judgment for that amouni BAIRD Appealed claim.
the previously the allowed % tn. Department. IL
full settlement Of the claim tbs demand .osd not sustained H IA.
No Morgan !. sg .. sAppeal from tLs Court Of Claims
The chartered the 10 the 6oyernnens
under ehap which provided that The war risk va. to % eSns
ne steamer being santiago under this charter
P ,lG W" as o5s ss od a ana s 1 p the judgment Of
the MISTER and pilot as to the sasy Of proceeding to sea,
paid This balance parties insisting that tbs Govern
the damage TX Court Of Claims ruled and
The case appealed the claimants urging The. iA Government vas m
wond follow aud that under such state Of the case
91s to Dc .d ,S @ ZOE Of f s I & The
The stu: the perl @ within the class to Be borne os BY s SoS
cred BY the Court determining The class Of peril. 20 which s oao -
acPbsHon and n p chpn'n for claimants
No J1I-hOlOmOn 81 a. sgt dpham h1ltOr OF LoupanA
Court Of LounAThe plaintiffs error are
the Of assigned claim Of NIen late public Pnn's1 o
Louisiana which 81 1911 directed to be PAID ee
Auditor refused ground that the constitution promo
tied the Of beyond SlO0O and exceeded
that when the passed directing this amount eo3 ~ 70
paid 70 Nixon nadamus applied Tor and the courts OF voc
state refused it. This wn Of error taken 70 review sat
made 20 dismiss the writ the ground that there no
federal Involved the The only involved the
decided said the validity Of act OF The state Legs
highest the State decided against ~ ot %
point record showing that the Constitution Of me
United treaty thereof drawn question Ano
the Federal therefore, Jurisdiction to reverse the Judgment
For the psutf and opposition 10 the motion 70 dismiss
argued that PRIOR the adoption Of the constitution there s
NiIon and the State public printer ana ~
Interpretation the constitution below made 70 aePnFe
Of his under his The Constitution b there
fore Of that caue Of the Federal Conu
prohibiting State from making any aw npang the Obligation
r. Dnrsn for the mOtsn John Key opposed
No. 26Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company agt H-ApPea
from the Supreme Court OF the District Of COamba an appeal
from establishing the right Of the appellee under contract
the canal
the bonus and rent payable By the contract The bonus and rent sea
By Company without
objection the rendered when this
appeal 6e the Company then and asserting that the Court
the between the parties elect to
contract and that the decree should be corrected or set
h, W. Coz for sppeant W. Daudgo Tor Ap'
pellee.