New-York tribune., 1872-03-27
THE JUDICIARY INPi~'11oaA1"S'

pAppoAD LOSSES FROM JUDGE BARNARDs NE
CetyERsuIPs-ERIES TOKEN OF GRAlla0N
INDECENT REMARKS FROM THE BEN'n
Judge Barnard's remarks publlsheo III ~
,e,,Sr Yesterday ON the probable disposition oi MS
case and his belief that II removed ho "ln "
elected we're discussed at the Fifth Avenue no'o'
tcrav with not a tito irony and disgust various con-
iectures were hazarded as the CONCLUSION I'e No"
tee will reach and it conceded as more ' p'oT
ba that not only will he be removed but also that no
viii be eectuay dsarned Of power to relnstate nsci'
at the Fall election. - .
Judge Ingraham, at his own request was o""ou W
dcny the mputaon that he left the city NJ the the 'o
Foley injunction applied lor 20 escape the resPo
nifty of granting it. lie affirmed the previous testimony
of Judge Sutherland, that compact restricuhg Inc
granting of niunctions to tho Judge regularly hong
Chambers was observed by the Judges OF the supreme
Court
CLARK Ben was called by defense reference to the
proceedings In 1869 against the Union Pachc Haroao
Company he recounted the steps Which, a. oysci nd :"
J ~ SSorc Granted and added that the road was nls
SstFously embarrassed by Judge barnsFds @fllo: WY
ness went with g. L. NJ. Barlow 10 Judge Balnaius icsI
dence and applied for modification OF the lnuncnon'
which was refused Witness asked why Judge Bar
nsr% sHd a@,e 10 tbs the Ss@t cGt Of the United
states October 1865, to March, 1852 and staea IN tna
hc could assign reason; when witness alpieu w d
Of the injunction order, Judge Barnard was
reformed that the suit was Instituted Dy a hus VI
ference with the business OF the road would he very
injurious Witness testified that six days subsequently
William NJ Tweed. H., was appointed receiver causinE
a loss Of several million dollars to the Company.
Arthur Johns. reporter testined that whe IN the gu
ureme Court in his professional c1paCy, DC hau ire
guently heard Judge Barnard highly improper and
ndecorOus expressons that few day after an assault
of Henry !. Raymond Judge BARNARD, While holding
Court rem arkcd from the bench in loud voice on
see my enemies don't prOsper RAYMOND Iroppea oca.
the other night as he got into his house and Eaton got
knocked little too hard over the head" similar express
Adrian Hcrzog OF the finn of L. Markell CO.. testified
that he had a contract to supply the Erie Railway win
| Eailroad office for large number OF expensive chairs
IL OF which were to have the initials c. o. b. stamped
| up0n them, and the remainder " Z. T."
The counsel of the Bar Association here asked the
counsel for the defense if they would consent TO allow
| Committee to visit Judge Barnard's house and see
whether the chairs mentioned could be found An en-
phatc refusal was instantly gwen, ana inc "lthess us
On Monday, Aeolph Levinger of the firm OF Townsend
| Levinger d Naldheimer testified that in the case o
seinllrdt agt Duff hs firm made application to Judg
Barnard for injunction to restrain the foreclosure
the chattel mortgage; that judge Barnard refused !.
hear the application grant the ORDER that seinardt
Fcllows and through him obtained FROM Judge Barnard
the injunction he had reyously refused; tLat SVciu m
harit. his examination, testified utt hs reason 10
applying 10 Mr. Fellows was ;he pretended incompe
tcncy Of LeyingeI, although ho adhhtted th,
application TO Judge Barnard, aud was no
! even positive that Levlngcr made the appii
cation. Yesterday Martin L. Townsend swoTe that ne
and not IeYnger, made the application 10 Judge Bar
| nard; that Judge Barnard poremptOrIly docnneG {.
near the application or to EXAMINE tIe Papers & &%nci
were the saGo as thosc upoL WHICH teIiV"s ihu"cc'
Judge Barnard TO sign the orGer'
THE ACCOUNTS OF JUDGE CARDOZO AND CRATE
| NATHAN--IHEIR EXPLANATION.
The accounts Of Gratz Nathan and judge
| Cardozo with the Mechanics Bank and the Me
ohauies Banking Association as submitted before
| tho judiciary Committee and published yester
| day. slow d strange coincidence in the dates
and amounts Of Nathans checks and Cardczo's
deposits and seem to indicate bribery and cOllusion
between the Judge and his referee TRIBUNE reporter
called upon CardoAo, who stated ho had given detailed
explanation Of the accounts. as presented before the
Committee in his testimony before that body, and that
he considered the dead. Direct charges of fraud
had never been made and the insinuatl0ns with which
the accounts were brought 10 the consideration Oh te
| Committee had not, he ciamed, been sustained.
,rutz Nathan admitted 70 The reporter, in general
! te,ms the correctness OF the statement OF his
| i'm, az presented 10 the judiciary Committee,
/ but claimed that the similarity between his checks
and tae amounts aud dates Of deposits made by Judge
tardzD ia the Ntcndnic.N Bank was matter Of u'fe
ia,n,e He said that lac intimately acquainted
| with CardcZ0, and bad frequently both loaned him
money ana borrowed from him, He remembered that in
one Cie, JUdEc CdlUoHO DcllS at Long bI"i'h au nc
only rIcIaiN Sunday there, CtidOZO hal taken the o-
ulUy Oi ,cbdlrG about $3.50 - the city ny nlh Tor
safe-Ecepng tlat Re mad depoaei the same with the
Mechanics Banking Association, dud thdt upon Judge
CarIO2Os return amount turned over 10 hun.
Nathan claimed tLt these accounts mad been fuly and
az he Lad ever 10 believe satisfactorily, explained
| beooro the Jud cary Committee.
The following specimen OF the accounts which cover
,od nearly years and involve over $4,000,
i show what remarkable condolences OccIGrcd IN the
dealings u the The bills deposited by Car
doZO nave, 1t said, been Identified ~ numerous In
stances as those pald OuL On Nath@ns checAe:
CLIDOLOs