Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-06

county.
A certain tract or parcel of land situated in
Knox county, about two miles north of Knox
| vile, bounded as follows: beginning at stake
| in the center of O spring at some rocks, and in
| the gap of a ridge corner with former
| ly Thomas RodgerS's land, thence south
white oak and the Lount farm,
| thence with the same north 80 east So poles to a
| black oak sappling on VIM Swans line, thence
north 4S west IS poles to a post oak corner with
| John Thompson's line, thence with his line
| north 80 west 1913 poles to a stake with sappIngs
| marked as pointers, on formerly Thomas Rodg-
ers line, thence south 80 west So poles to a rock
set in the ground in field, thence south 40 east
n poles, crossing the center of q sink in field
to post oak, thence south 50 east SO poles to
the beginning containing one hundred acres
more or less, being the same tract of land sold
on the 9th day of March, 1867, by decree of
the.Chancery Court of Knox county, and Jos.
A Mabry became the purchaser; sale confirm
ed at the April term of the Cbancery Conrt,
1867
ty of Knox, Second Civil District, bounded as
follows: beginning alta small post oak corner
with ). HOwelfs line, thence with Howelrs line
north y deg. and so min. west 81 poles, crossing
the spring branch to a double black oak, thence
north % deg. and so min. east Al poles To
small walnut, thence north 20 west 81 poles to
small post oak, thence north 10 east 20 poles to
stake, thence north 10 east 81 poles to q stake,
thence south 30 east 81 poles to stake and poin-
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs. Morgan and
Howell to the beginning, containing one hun
dred acres more or less being the same tract
conveyed TO Joseph A. Mabry by Anna Cha
hannes, and registered in Book +. Vol. 3, page
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox county.
a certain tract of land, situated in the County
of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded as
follows: beginning at stake l pole east of the
head ofa spring, in the gap of ridge and cor
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south 60
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sappling,
thence south q west % poles TO post oak,
thence north SO west 1913 poles to hickory
bush, thence north 80 east Sc poles TO a black
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles to Il black
oak, thence north 81 east 104 poles TO hickory,
thence south IS poles to q small hickory, thence
east W poles to post oak, thence south IS cast
loS poles to a stake, thence south 20 west lS
poles to a walnut stump, thence south A. east u
poles to the beginning, containg two hundred
acres more or less, being the same tract convey
cd to Joseph A Mabry, on the 4th day of Sep
tember 1867, by John Thompson, and regis
tered in Book A, Vol. g. page So
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Mabry'S
addition to Knoxville, tO-wit Nos. - ~ %,
30 So, 81, 90 81, 81, a. SO, 49, SO, 104 105, 106,
being sixteen Lots also Lot in Kennedy's
addition to Knoxville, and fity-six lots in Ma
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville from No
to 56 inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ma
)
1st Range South, Nos. 80, 81, 107, 10, 49,
$780, 131, I3l, 1885, 1873, 1872, 129, 128, 1O9 1U8 ILL.,
~ ll3, ia, 123 12i, 125 12G, II, 2, 3D. %, 80
10, 10, III, ID
% Range South, 49, 81, 63 g., 155, 158, 1j9,
15G, al, III, 1j1, 90, 153, 154, 60.
1st Range North, %, 81 110, 100, ia, III, 113,
III, 133, 134 105 100, l18, III, 116, 49, III 128
1I9 $50, 13j, 1876, 49,, 138, - -, %, II 80, sc
40, JOG, 49, 124, 125, 126.
ID Range North, 81, SO, 81 40, 151, 152, 153,
z-r,
100 161 162, 81, 60, IS.
2O4 acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
of Knox county, and described March /. 1862,
as beginning on a spanish oak, running thence
north As deg. and 15l min. east 49, poles, thence
west1 pole to post oak stump, thence south 80
poles to Il stump, thence to the beginni.-g
being Il part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North of
James Bells, near Thos Z Champions proper
ty, belonging to A Whites estate, and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabry by
John Williams and J Craig, executors Of
Sam A White, March l, 1862, by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knex county, in
Book a. Vol Sd, page 4OI.
10 acres Of land lying in the I'd civil district of
Knox county and bounded and described as
follows, to wit Beginning at a stake ON the
Fair Grounds fence, running thence s 81 L II
poles with said fence, thence AZ II poles
with said fence, thence 40 4 8poles with said
fence thence S % Z u poles with said
fence, thence N &c i Is! poles to a stake corner
to Mabry and HOrrrell, near the branch,
thence North % East with Mabrys
line Al poles to a stake, Mabry's corner, thence
north IS west Al poles with Mabry's line, to a
stake thence north AZ west 10 poles to stake,
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
to Joseph a Mabry, April %, 1862,
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book +.
Vol. Sd, page 24j.
Lots Nos. 4. 8 and g. as designated upon the
map of the Kennedy property on file in the
Court of Knox county, in the case of
L. w. Vanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to JOS. A.
Mabry by ID. A. Deadericl1, G. & NJ, May eth,
1868, by deed registered in the Registers Office
of Knox county, in Book +. Vol. 3, page $40.
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry
About 98l acres of land lying in the 10th civil
district of Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph A Mabry by Jno Pate, guardian, &c,
by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county, in Book Y. Volume 2, page 243.
and dated May 3, 1853. Said land adjoins the
lands of Elijah Walker, - Smith and others,
and levied on as the property Of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The wrts Of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
in the case of l. NJ Fatio VS. p Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, to-wit
No = 267 in the case Of Brownlow 81 Ross vs.
Lyon s. Ramsey trustees &c, ct ais.
No. 22G6 in same case as next above.
No. 2O65, in case of Odell q Mabry vs. WI |
l1ins 81 Freels, administrators
No. 2OGG, IN same case as neNt ABOVE n
N. 1,943, in case of Joseph A Mabry and vile
VS. Chuschwell & Armstrong.
IN I i'm "A
No. ,8O5, in case of Mabry & Rule " Tenn
pie Harris.
No. !. 8O4. in some case as next above
No 1874 in case of Jno n Williams VS. "A
No. 1,8I5, in case of Jno Williams VS. J \
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2.27O, in case of JnO + Helms ct ais VS. g
Mynatt admir-, ct ais
no. 2269, in case of Jno Helms ct ais VS. G
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No 2Ol4, in case of j A 81 g w Mabry VS. G
\ Nee.
No 3OI5 in case of J A & G. w Mabrv u &