Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1872-11-05


The following, compiled from official
sources, shows the party majorities in
all the States Of the Union:
ALABAMA.-In 1865 Grant had a ma
jorit v Of 1890, but in 1870 the Democrats
in the GubernatOrial election had a ma
10 rity Of III.
ARKANsAs.-In 1865 Grant bad a ma
jority Of 3O74, but In 1870, in the Congres-
si0nal contest, this was reduced to ZIP.
CALIFORNIA.-In 1865 Grants major
ity was 5l4, in 1859 the Democratic ma
jOrity for Judge Of the Supreme Court
was 1851, but the Radical majority for
Governor in 1871 was 506l.
CONNECTICUT.-In 1868 Grants ma
jority was 3041; in 1859 this was reduced
% All; in 1870 this last was increased TO
-43, but in 1871 il fell to IS, and in 1872
for Governor to > Radical majority.
DELAwABE.-In 1868 SeymOur's ma
jority was 1851, and the Democratic
Governor in 1870 was elected by a major
ity Uf 247O.
FLoRIDA.-In 1865 the Radical Gov
eruOr was elected by a majority Of 63lS
votes, but in the Congressional contest
Of 1870 the Democrats had a majority in
the State Of Dds.
GEoRGIA.-In 1868 Seymour had a
majority OF a sos, and in 1872 Smith,
Governor, Of over 81, 600.
IDAHO TERRITORY.-In 1866 the
Democratic majority was us; in 1865 il
was SS4, and in 1870 it was -.
ILLINOIs.- 1853 Gran majority
5l,l5O; but in the vote for treasurer in
1870 this was reduced 10 2, ,6SS, but rose
again in the Congressional contest Of
ls7l 10 q ,620.
e.
was 1912: in 1879 the Democratic ma
jority for Secretary Of State was 256S,
and Hendricks's (Democrat) majority
was 96S.
IOwA.-In 1868 Grants majority was
46,357; in 1859 the Radical Governor
was elected by a majority OF SO, ls5, and
in 1870 the Radical Secretary Of State
had a majority Of ~, 4s9, and In 1871 the
Radical Supreme Court was elected by q
majOrity-Of Il ,25t.
KANsAs.-In 1868 Grants majority
was l6, 4Os, and In 1870 the Radical can
didate for Governor was elected by q
majority Of 2O,l7e.
KENTUCKY.-In 1868 Seymour's ma
jority was 1878, and IN 1871 the Demo-
cratic candidate for Governor WAS
elected by majority Of 36, ,976.
LOUIsIANA.-ln 1865 SeymOur's ma
iOrity was Is, 27S, but inlls7 the Radical
candidate for Treasurer was elected by
a majority Of "A, AZ.
MAINE.-ln 1865 Grants majority
was 20,033; in 1872 the Radical candi-
date for Governor was elected by a ma
iority Of ,O4S.
MARYLAND.-In 1865 Seymour's ma
iority was 81 ,9l9, aud in 1S7l the Dem
ocratic candidate for Governor was
elected by majority Of l5,l35.
MAssACHUsETTs.-I 1858 Grants
majority was 7S,069, and the Radical
gubernatOrial majority in 1871, Il, ,95S.
NICHIGAN.-In 1858 Grants majority
was 81 .4Sl, but In 1871 the Radical ma
ioritv was reduced 70 Is, ,529.
MINNFSoTA.-In 1865 Grants MAORI.
~ was IS, 40, and in 1871 the Radica
candidate for Governor was elected by
majority Of II 9S6.
NrssotrRI.-In 1868 Grants maiOrit,
was g. .sS3, and in $50 the Liberal ma
iority for Governor was Al OBS.
MfssIssIPPL-In this State the voter
aid not vote for President in 1865, bu
the Democratic candidate for Governo
was elected by a majority OF $40. II
1869 a Radical Governor was elected b.
a majority Of 81, ,059.
NEBRAsKA.-In 1866 the Radical ma
jority was l45; 10 1865, 249l, and IN 1876
247s
NEvADA-In 1868 Grants majOrit.
was 1852, but in 1870 the Democrats car
ried the State by 1852 majority.
NEW HAarPsHIRE.-fn 1865 Grant
majority was 6e67. In 1871 q Demo
cratic Governor was elected By plural