The New York herald., 1872-12-05

3
time before adjournment Mr.. Stockton, on me part
Of complainants, commenced TO read the aepesi
tiOns Of the dinerent witnesses examined on the
behalf Of complainants. II 10 expected thai ~
reading OF Gil the papers win be got through witA
this forenoon, when Mr.. Williamson. ~ ~ psa
sumed, VIII commence TO address the Court.
large number Of people throng the Court each aay
since the proceedings commenced ana mach is.
terest seems to be manifested by them ~ the case
progressea The Court opens az halfpast ten and
adj0urns At . quarter TO four O'Clock each day.
TaIs DEFENDANTS ANSWER.
In CnAxcERr OF NEW JERsxy :rAs An~ser g ne sssa.
Xss ysss Rsa s osas Sar%sS sss a ssi Pe.
scr Tss aascad sSsrSs n,y sSsasa. %
and reservng 70 hsmselves all and all manner OF benefit
races and imperfectons in the said bill Of
for answer nsTcC and unto .
rial fer them e make M answer unto answering
sSs said sompsinsnts the % fssnsyiysnis % Rsiliosd road
Company have no right to nle their said bill Of com
% y
DssS S
accSrdns to the rsqurement ci the statute in that case
this suit r. a snd o. Nc
o. IN p s a. na
ton had been made by plea or demurrer
& S s ns Mss
1s aa
urther that the said lease has never in fact been SO
a Of E Ss sns
a as anS Ss s c
allegation Of lodging said lease record afors
n
Sr To- z the same and show no title 70 an nunc.
o sson h as c
oss 1thss snsWeTns
the midonder Of the said the Pennsyvan Rail
SeSS y and a Ss
last mentioned company has no right further to proceed
psss
such r.: Sssn msss y plea
M Anf A. hs s,s Ssm eE snd
Ssys ssnsissrsS sx.y and lost 81 possession ana
s:y such wSsrsSSs . &s:s arc
5srsy have no 1sSs
9s s
6enet and advantage in this regard as
u XXI ,:ss y s:I
Ss
az o g sg e ss :s.sss q
e. as & ~ .% o. 4Sn, sp
authority and for the sns alone 50 70 sss., there be
Js
answer In this regard 70 the said bill OF complaint and
OblectiOn e this regard il such objection had been
And thsse Defendants s.y that they are duly ncorpo
scs referred . n ssid bin of compisint and copy
that y The s
81 ne : S % S SsH
wn hss
sosver nsesssry Or ior the Objects he
ea
porsoa was duly and n good faith organised according
AIT and tns y.TSus .sstions p thereof that so.e ads
shares o the capital said corpora
tSn that directors were chosen officers appointed and
IN BE vii. n @
to q sss
sss y e !ss al. :p:sss 4
e. Kess Of ss e. r
e Z
BY the consiuon the laws and customs Of the STATE Of
Jersey thss ne PrssdsS! q ne Senate ana .hs
s s g e. gd
this state and respectfully submit that the same can
whstsver given 70 impugn in anywss cali in
n .na a thss h a. $ @ M !:
sCncys evidence Ssrs enc d and
nit evidence to show that the said act voted and
passed and approved variant from that fled in the
fendans are advised BY ths counsel and that the
or Or the S part
. IN s & Ssar ns
shsss deny that the said passed
that there any truth In any or either Of the
IN Ss page se o Se
complaint printed and nled in this cause And these
these defendants alege that the usual copies Of
s,G s s n %
s Ss c E S OF os a. oqe hs
tsy
Ps
thence % sst ~ ana 5 81 o s S
complaint herein although these defendants are in
sns sppSss q d
Of the Sn % @ a Ss bill in %
% s X na rsaa y s H
Clerk the usual in said House zeeularis
and in due course stamped and signed by the President
lively E was duly signed the eoysrnor
and Without fraud
sns nd'e 81 Ct q sas
evidence against these defendants and that i
% insert .ISs shsm said s Of @ eompsint
many thereof said scs was passed By Ss
legislature without and uninuenced by, deception
y BONA rpx ORGANIZATION
And theae DEFENDANTS, furthcr answering pY0test
ing, nevertheless that they not bound to make
this regard that the organization of their said
corporation fraud, that II procured with
the de intent OF constructing the particular road in
said act described that such intent still exists that the
route therefor or about 4th dav
s ;s s % ,d s By s snS s n
organized only the of incorporation for the
purpose of the construction OF line Of railroad between
Philadelphia and New York; and though it true that
proposed through said charter to effect such object
they insist that the same is not Illegal the
by which said object 4 proposed TO be accomplished
And these defendants further answering that each
OF the directors OF said at the time OF their
election and has been since, bona de stockholder in
said company
And these defendants. further answering, say
that after said organization said agreement of
consolidation set forth In said bill Of complaint
was duly made, executed and delivered between
these defendants and the other corporations
therein Damed and assened TO by each q The stock
thctreo. And they submit that the same Is legal,
and deny each and every Of the propositions of law and
TACT stated pages 81 and 50 Of said bill and
the contrary thereof and OF each OF them TO be true
And these defendans further answering that amer
wards and on the Let day Of July 1871 they the said de-
Railway Company a certain indenturc Of which Is