The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-08-15

,ause Il was his desre to keep bis client in good com
pany Counsel then noticed the charge In article 70
mat Judge Barnard, after refuslng an injcnction
oiicaticn 81 Fellows the injunction was issued and
this through favoritism TO Fellows. Counsel IN
s.srS to him that Judge Barnard
order. Counsel then referred TO article 30 ~ which
Judge barnard was charged with alscnafging SIX
FALSE REGISTRY OF VOTERS,
without due consideration. Counsel stated the
men were arrested In the evening. when writ OF
habeas corpus was issued by the Judge maae re-
tarnabe to himself Lney wers 6roSgn n ne DelGpe
that there was no charge made against them by any
one he ordered their discharge, This was all there
Of arrest s' f GsSs occurring IN New
York BY the police upon the slightest prov
ocatlon and under the most nimsy sutnor,
contained In articles 81 SO. a. IS and 49,. article
81 referring to matter connected with others al
Of the fictitious names Of John Doe and Richard Roe
In the New York Pier and Warehouse Company
%as .o%sSs q sns 0GSs a
the proceedings In the case and the charges in the
articles, all having reference to the New York Pier
THE ORDERS WE'RE ISSUED
upon proper presentation OF facts; but upon being
advised Of certain other facts he stopped the pro-
ceedings at once and dismissed the matter. How,
he asked, Is it possible to show corruption on the
part Of Judge when he thus promptly corrects an
to justice to even suspect corruption under such
circumstances. We're he governed BY corrupt mo-
had Sherwood in his power for showing contempt
for his orders, would he have acknowledged his
c Concealed rom Kim BY Lane ana with stern nds
nation dismissed the proceedings ana driven Lane
out Of the Ccurtp AS to the thirty-seventh article
containing charges OF Judge Barnard using frivolous
and vulgar language, counsel simply directed the
court to the evidence which had been taken. He
then spoke In review OF all the charges starting out
with the declaration that ali the orders Issued by
Judge Barnard had been regulurly issued and
according to law; and, in addition ne IN,
issue of these orders when properly applied for he
then presented the case, Il Judge was to be held
Ss enow now
to be both ubiquitous and omniscient. He sub
mitted that this would he asking too much, alto
on the COURT to ne 0a00 'A' '
CASE OF TIE UNION PACIFIC
Raroad company ana vna. not rom he
issue OF the orders OF Judge Barnard, but rather
from the publicity given the iacts Of me msman
true cause Of any damaging erect, II there
was any. Counsel then proceeded to ad,
s cass ss w o e Sc ssns ns aS
and 4 sa to Ss wc"d
case thus far ~ with the prevailing idea that
Juuge bdTuuru uuu acUeu III dCCOIuuHCe
with law and the practice, and as II was
aspects he would suppose that he had committed
errors. Counsel here INDUCED In hight OF e0-
quence which enchanted the attention OF all
present for several minutes, in which he presents"
the duties OF Judges and courts and exn,e ssed
wlint was expected of them; but, se3a. ne. while
admit that this client may have Committed errors,
he demanded the proof DE would protest against
any assumption. He
DEMANDED PROOF OF A GUILTY PURPOSE
In any thing which he had done. Counsel glanced
at the social charges made against the respond
ent and his intimacy with James Fisk, Jr.
Detectives had been put on his track, and yet the
fruits OF their labors were that he was
seen going to the Erie Railway ONCE five
company once or twice. TDat is ALL That is all
the bloodhound spies set on his track by the Bar
Association could learn. Spy reporters were
also set In watch In his Court, and what
did they secure? lie warned the Court against let
ting this system gain position by attention here.
for 1t did not know how soon the same bloodh0unds
would be put en- the track Of each and every
member Of this Court and all their
privacies brought to light. There would he said,
then be plenty Of impeachments. No, said he, the
private life Of this respondent-the private life
no place here. Whatever has been done by this
respondent in private life Is not subject of inquiry
here. But shOdld he SO conduct himself In open
public as to become byword and reproach,
then counsel admitted he should be brought before
this bar. Counsel then referred to q number Of
circumstances In the case, which he discussed and
explained.
The hour OF three arriving the Court adjourned
ere Mr.. Beach had finished hts arguments