New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1872-05-31
NOTES FROM THE PRESS.

The editor of q prominent and influential
Texas paper writes: 1.-THE wish OF tho Democracy OF
Texas is that Baltimore shall mako no nominations, but
simply recommend the party to support Greeley and
Brown. In that the state can be carried Tor tne
the Liberals by rousng majority. Galveston mas been
holding her primaries and IN every case Hreoey men
making no nomination. the contest in this State will be
one of race, few ambitious white leaders manipuatnG
the cOlored vote I'm favor of Grant while the whites VIII
be almost exclusively for Greeley
A Washington woman has written to The
Riaohaon Times that she does not favor Mr. Greeley
for President" II do not" says the dame or damse
have the faith I'm him formerly had" This would
no doubt be very dscouraging to Mr. Greeleys friends
only tle aui "i tbe office It
ia the most desirable place for lady Of any
Oh vY nc iy cannot see Why Grant has not done
well az any could; we need not exDect perfection
In this respect the writer differs from many OF the
mascuine ofce-hOders, who not only expected per1ec
ton but are ready swear that they nave not Deeh
bit disappointed. .
Commenting on the virulent tone assumed by
Mr. Greeley's adyersarles in few journals opposing Dis
election The Erenng Express says "They are willing
erouph 10 elevate him TO any position of honorable
atation when the use Of his can be made wedge
to divide Liberal from Liberal or Grant Republicans
Then he is patriot, statesman a humans tna
rcellent man but perchance, II he Is to be nominated
aG Raltimore this same Mr. Greeley becomes at once
eectional Impractical, unsafe full OF pad anteeeoenls
and present faults. Now, as men are not changed 'ter
Inv he character OF those who support or oppose nr
bntos M once apparent that opposition TO them Is
founded upon personal diskes the least Just an
sensible of all politics. whether OF party OF OF men,
The Cincinnati Gazette having exhausted
tbe vocabulary OF ridicule and abuse against Horace
Greeley now devOtes nearly two columns OF "hat INC
editor STYLES insxibe logic TO prove to the Democracy
that the nomination OF Greeley is the only policy Tor
the Democratic party, without regard 10 sgns Oi no
nubIican following The Democratic expression since
bo Cfncinuau elf-generateddeeg Convention hOn
mated Greeley proves that he Is the most popular eau
date the Democratic party that eo9lu 10 ~ &
for Greeley. The Democrauc masses nllu III "
altering of a Democratic candidate without the ouiu
from their selfcondemnation. They insunctlYey per
ceve that herein Is promise or new uepaIluIS "
Which they NAV escape from their bad faHc mus ISio
"a M the bottom Of this Democratic uprising Ior rIseeJ
n genuine conviction and contritlOl ana hoPo Vi ~
demptiOn from their own SAD statc'
The Hon. Thomas l.. Jones OF Kentucky
sents the points that must rule the action OF the
democracy In reference to the Cincinnati nominee IN
Letter ia The Cincinnati Enquirer He argues that MI
Creelev IL acceptable 10 the Reform sentiment VI to
and must be Endorsed at laltlOfe anu III
sion says: Let tne people thsreioro ~ heir Wishes
while ali good Democrats should submit 10 the i S
~ tbe senbled wisdom OF their party III Nttv, Gu
vention, am free TO express inc oP IMPERATIVE To
ecnent and indorse the nominations OF GIIehA and
proXTn for President aud Vice-Presldent Oh ne Ii
states. l had until lately auhoCs as The best
iicst Tor the Democracy the coming struggle Dut
now the outlook Is different ana a. Ie iv y" r,
suit policy and action 70 o onnortnnity shall we
I'LL, ~, ~ ma ry the printer boy, the Iarlhei sage
az the Empre s.te-tho second frlhilh oi ,ic hou,
lie III can be no for u.s. pIOpaDg Nm 10 nti5
h,,r A. ali events Il is the only chance FOR change
r ~ oo Don Pat cad Other Political ha!1S'. 80 ss'oHi
~" ~ '' PaS@