New-York tribune., 1872-08-08
TIE BARNARD TRIAL.
END OF THE INvEsTIGATIoN-ADJoUR TO
MONDAY NEXT,

END OF THE observation-disclosures TO
MONDAY NEXT.
IBY TELEGRAPH TO The TRlBUNEl
SARATOGA, Aug. 7.-At last the evidence in
the Barnard impeachment trial IS all in and all that re-
mains before the counsel for the people Will have per
formed their whole duty is the summing up This VIII
undoubtedly consume two entire days, counting IN the
argument on the part OF the defense when the EVIL
dence closed to-day the question at once arose as 10 now
long time should he given to counsel to prepare them
selves and after good deal of opposition motion pre-
vailed 10 take a recess until Monday next thus allowing
an opportunity for the printers hasten UP the cs
mony and time for all the members of the Court to d
gest it thoroughly. II they are so inclined.
The evidence produced to-day has been Of secondary
interest 1t consisted first OF the testimony OF Martin
d. Conway formerly in the office OF Hamilton Harris,
called by the prosecution and examined by Mr. stchney
Ho testified merely the fact Of his going with Sterling
to Pougheepse to obtain orders from Judge Barnard
AGAINST the Albany and susquehanna Railroad Company
John H. strahan. lawyer testified for the defense that
the object Of the Foley injunction suit was 10 restrain the
officials from expending money in the carrying on
OF the city government eXtravagantly as they had
been doing; Tweed, sweeny Connolly, and Hall had
absolute power at that time, aud the effect
Of the Injunction made by Barnard to put stop TO
the issuing of bonds Of any description and TO arrest the
course OF these men, The witness said Barnard granted
the Injunction from sense Of duty, and subsequently
modified IL only upon the affidavit OF Andrew H. Green
Mr. strahan showed the good effects OF the injunction
by saving that it put Mr. Green into his present Office
and in many other ways OF immense benefit to the
City OF New York The result aimed at III Mr. Strahan's
testimony is comparable 10 locking tne stable after the
horse has been stoen for by II Barnard evidently ex-
poets to excuse previous bad conduct by or two sub
feduent spasmodc efforts at reform.
John Garvey, brother Of Andrew J. Garvey, was ex-
anined by Mr. Van Colt in relation TO the work done
upon Judge Barnards house The witness attended to
tho mechanical part OF the business OF which he was
general superintendent for his brother Nv Beacl oh
iected to this evidence oI conIse as u neu T 10
contradict Judge Barnard aud claimed that IL was
cumulative, and was OPENING the case. Leut,,u&Xv. &
witness testified that he had performed two jobs Of
work in BarnaTds house and received directions from
some of Barnards family in reference the work lie
was subjected to a rigid cross CXaluiuailQu WlCp ny
bore with 30 much coolnes- as to create continual
Joseph II Ramsey, who was the President Of the Al
bany and susguehanua Railroad COMPANY IN August ltdy'
testified briefly la regard 10 the serving OF the Injunction
urCn the Company and that subsequently DAVID Dudley
Field meeting him said. eeringly, An Ramsey, how Is
This witness closed the evidence ana the Cour, took
recess unu Monday. large number OF ne members
OF the Conrt went nome tonight 10 spend tbe tcfms-
sion with their families.
TESTIMONY OF GARvEY's BRoTUEP-THE WORK
on BARNARD'5 HOUSE--TRANsFEEa OF PROP
GENERAL PRESS DISPATCHl
SARATOGA, Aug John Garvey, brother Of
Andrew J. Garyey, was sworn, and e titled that he had
general charge of the mechanical part OF his brothers
business superntcnded the work at Judge Barnard's
house in the Fan OF sCs work in two small
chambers upstairs, the hallway, and diningroom; on
another occasion other work doee and som. IT Il
under the direction Of Mrs. Barnard; six ,soas work
in all, was done. -r.-,--''
C-.y,,-eyamI6ed by Mr.. Beach-Nevcr was connected
ia bdsiesB with nv br0thcr have been general super
ntendent fcf him abont ten years he has 6een IN tnat
business 20 years never knew him To be musl-
clan az dances or puolic IestNuesi ne mas eQhNeyed
property to me; IL was last year; was
house OF two in Thirteenth-st; two or
vacant property up in Madisonave; ordinary building
lots can't what the lots worth should not say
lot there worth from $4,000 to $4,000 own the house
aud lot live in in Feth-st., and aiso Thir-
eenthst afraid to give my idea of the value OF the
how much paid Andrew J. Garyey for themi got
them al in one deed there were ai5o some % B0dleIasd "a
two three lots on Fitaye near seventy-secohd-st;
sderation named IN the decd; PAD me SO dont Know
where the deed Was drawn 10 was executed IN Andrews
house, there was notary Andrews WIFE, Andrew and
myself were present picruhle uleIo W's IaNteI
present. do MT recOect his name; did not pay other
consideration than the $40 the property; received
other property; received bonds aud mortgages TO lqu
date his debts there Nctt Arec mortgages OF $4,000
some worthless stock; the iced was executed in Au
gust September, 1871 my brother went To Europe
turned in January succeeding; knew there excite
ment in New-YoTk about frauds; did not know or hear
OF lis making any transfer OF property o his wife at the
time; have made no negotiations with the city author
| itlcs as to the claims against him; don't know
I OF his wife dong never wrote 20 hin while
abroad about such negotiations did any work
the house OF Thomas CreameE the WORK on Barnards
house done Ia the Fall OF s6sand again year after
| don't remember that his family were at home while
| doing the second Job; certainly Judge Barnard
there twice cannot tell exactly when the work done
To Mr.. Van Cott-Our workmen frequently work ON
| other peoples houses out Of hours do not know
whether they thus worked on Creamer's house; when
my brother conveyed this property to me Immediately
| conveyed IL TO his wife.
To Mr.. Beach-Fileppo Donnarumma superintended
the work OF Judge Barnards house don't know his
appeared the fraudulent warrants which passed
| through the Controllers o1ice.