The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-11-01

the defendant That argument eminently credtable
s ss s s Sss SsSs
N, Ssy shf Be
soSa Of aasne all oa
pTeudices against the witnesses for the people or the
aad ~ tEs
Wac 4:
ss a ne vsT IL
Ssss's ssS
70
oaS %
some q that and which seem e
Sssay would Be s s l %cde fhe
c Ssys the ~ Sa 10 q the and
told Yen that the p,ece Of silver had been The
q
it in some way and then aeI,I i would have been
ss Ns "a e
Mr. as and said this Without sass
nss ws s
swe in with this that
YOU what Newspaper re
g be for
a. s n the
~ sag q % q1S 81 n f
paper correspondent in which Mr. Stoughton was de-
ass Ct
xSR sifq Ky mt
+ sublime lime and exhibition
its SURROUNDINGS taken IN connection with these stipend
oas raadsT9at Of which the Indictment had is origin
concerned in the administration Of Justice upon the mind
Of the learned Judge the counsel the defe nant and the
jury,
and importance of the issues by which, by your verdict
those issues viii be determined You see the Chief Magis
mi AT $ fnasss sGss
There sssr aTy
% n 10 and
Mr. Trem mar then alluded e the shaaactes Of the
assSl
HI
yet there has been no satisfaction either in the civil
ns to
that has done 60 much to bring dishonor and re.
o y snd ss but as
Thing IN the way Of sympathy Of ' partisan and po
W These Or VIII s.
snse @ IKE % Sefe e se
e "a I limited ss
understand the counsel to have charged him that
duty
s S and sa hss b @
opposed in politics. his personal relations were most
such man, but he had long ago accepted the charge
from
Of pursuing the frauds and that duty he must a The
mailing p all The shsss !s were under the TIC
Ing vast amount Of snrpusage, but substantially for
By a e. me ssa on n% rs pu
gnnshmsnt not to exceed one years Or
Ss @
So that b
couii be given; and this repealed any idea Of
on the ns ads % f d%s "a SSw s
to audit IN Of these
w nSf @ saM that That
the paropsd
frsmsH IN the course q long argument then
pisy an sI
@ w'i
'fhe
Of the De- sd that he dd not
msnt that # by any neglect Of public officer the public
Sas
building Of house on certificates Of the architect and
s
i was NJ. Tremain said, unnecessary That that
d s
Mayor Va. @ snAas n . as s assVsy hs
hs ss sss S Was
form Of law that would reach man who had been
'sss 4na
of ssas s5ws sSSs d
in some was not Mayor Hail did this: he cer.ihed
he
ha no qi
guilty other
~ psea, influence
claimant being me%SeT sypeesesI
through the Lesslstafe BY which the board Of
Mayor csaes , and Mss Of city
power was conferred on members q that ring and
s!s
r.. il sss r.
powers were given the Mayor by which he had the
patronage of nine of the public departments under his
control. There therefore, might be other motives be-
sides pecuniary considerations. The Mayor a party
.nd s the from
BARDRLL AND PICKwlcK
He would also recall another portion of the trial.
Sam Wellers failure to see his father Was there no
TO see 1t was not necessary to show q share in
the plumber The law distinctly said that wilu omission
should Be punished as misdeme What was the
~ this w sr By s sSa,
claims against The city and county OF New York passed
before the 5th of April 1870 How could these men then
wlay neglect The duty o. audit The law against
wtul neglect of duty imposed The Board Of Audit
imposed the duty Of auditing all previous claims against
70 be paid How could that duty be wiiuy neglected.
Justice Of the Peace who refused to administer
an oath, when the Court rulcd that his
belief that he was not bound to administer 1t
was no excuse. He was bound to know the law and in
territorial refusal wilful neglect there was no
necessity that it should have been corrupt to complete
So In this case u the accused deliberately
dcrtook not to himself audit these claims notwithsand
in other way, and even II there were corrupt
knowledge or bargain II wilful neglect and sub
jected him to punishment To sanction the loose and
AUTHORITARIAN