Green-Mountain freeman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1844-1884, 1872-11-27

failed to find an iota of opinion tat had the
least app -4ti N u this ca".. IT, r"cited
that case. t show wher-in tn. twD 4 q rel.
Il this case the bill provides that the
trus.e-s of n wbury Seminary shall have
the right to silt, AMI n ,dg else has any
right % interfere in the mater. It provides
J that for the paltry sum Oi $1,000 thy m ~
! sell nr ,pertv eOn'e@sedly 'rGh trDrn SoO'W
to $S000 tO the ne rple Of y 'Sbury IL tneY
saw DC To huv it; if MT. 30 anY me else. Cne
right of pr per Y, he claim d was just as
sacr, d to the mii)ritv wI0 i = red I'd > ii,
as ta he minority. The q lestiI N uf ve~tet
rights WAS discussed, and the removal she
/ New Il mptpn IN. H. insrItI'IOu 10
! Fairfax. V5.. was alsn eI ~ preoei mt 20
this case Uther denominations have their
educasiDna Institutions subj Ct e. their own
ma "a. cement, and where is tie wrong IN the
| Methodist, a large, powerful Al SrlW,nS
denomination, having the same rlShtf The
donors Il the Nv .Iry insrICIti m. 20 the
amount OF $50 900 desire e. re- seive som :
thing fro n that 'na5lnn that NAV be male
! Q p-acIcthIy available for the Purposes tor
which il Ras d mated. This hill dOes not
seek to destroy Newb1ry Sem'ntry-lt
prnpOs 5 G. C cIntinue it, and gives the people
/ oi \ wburv the - refusal, = OF fist rIg It 60
pu chase the property. The inevItab g tate
Ut the institution, without the fostering care
OF the Conference o. de0 Inin 4tIDn esta dish
| ing it, could n 1t be tniSt,ak N or averted.
Y III canno5 compel the VI t. 'diSts G. sustain
that institution If rheV d. nJs Sc e. d.
| 80. lie believed It e. b3 our b. milan day
t. pas this bull. which h ID occupied the
! IrteIJiOn of the Court and the lie gIslasure
/ for two Y .ArS AMI end thus caatr " rzy.
Mr. Wils, n noticed the argu nent Of
| Nc. Powers il reference e. the d rrt'n ruth
20 Ie e use. The adv Gates o. this bill " int
! to get the question IutO the Supreme Curt,
and then Gy the cIn~titu uti hn Al q ie@t'on.
tie sInewhat sh ,rply crICielse Ein of the
legal arguments p ,esented- by Mr. PrWers-
Mr.. Bailey strI he n 81 no elm, aud 40
interest IN this hui, and 1t 1t Nv th tt
Dught TO he .sse :, thsu we lluii pas it,
, n rwise not. lie ,bjected q the proposed
a Den iiH-nr, AMI a Ised trOm section pne IT
the c rte con hrIOutng the sup.;rIpCI 'ls for
e>tthlIshIng NeSbury Sen,na y. II als1
-ess,i from che ds ;iSIIn- the SIpcs jIteG
tn sustain the Islti N Of tna opp p'Islr4 If
he bI l. and II ed other cases wh re su bscrip
Ilns had been VT held, Or al { ii l;t'On
srtntrd enj lining apple ttIJn Ji funds vie g
deviation appa et
rne q IestI ln b tn1 on the ad option Of the
4 n-nlnent IF. Ell ~ NJ p 'Fsos. Ic. Al
de snleI Tue sas aal IA 'ys, winch are
+ toll 1S-:
s--Ue-Sr<. B,rnes, Bl'ter6 II. o ppen-
ter, E-tey. Kellogg, Ltm0. P0 sers, Sprasus
u,i We zy-9
N-ys-Mes,r-. AanS. Biley. B.n4ri.
'4rrle t, B,Le'nw, Coltpl, 81 ,son, Iii lck'ey,
Il 'uLnt"n Humphrey, ,I,spn. VI 'rrIit,
;'gers, &c TT, Snedd, Switn, Stiles aud
~ Iieon-l9.
Ilou-E. Resolutions By Mr.. Sanborn,
# L.udon, that during the remainder at the
session. evening s''ssi n he held at Z . clock;
IN IN 'ttuu Of NJ. DAVIS, oi Reading, or
ieret t. lie.
BY NJ Buslue |, Of Waitsfi Id. that np'se
n tde ny the zta up'ng Of teet, Or t1s drop
ing pt iesk hd,. or IA any 0thsr N tn ier co
ehIr any meub r trom spstkinG Oa the
d,,r OF TINS do -, Is not IN ac;0rdt Ics with
ie prI Icip eS u frss sO8s:l, All - MT
oInt .nancei by the mem 1ers OF this Ii Juse;
81 pet.
b. NJ. Waterman. of Hydepark, that
iurIng the rrun ,iuIc- Of the s-sSl0I, ~ mem-
er tie allowed u spsik tor III IRE than twsn-
minu es On any question, At one time,
without the unanimous consent ot the HJuse;
,dnpfei
By Mr. M.Dutf e of B-a ifori, that che
'nducC of certain IN , hers ot this II 'use 10
,nterrup ing the gentle Ia tr0 IL ID park,
lnenber of tnis uou=e. while he W. al
iresslng the Ii IuSe trI1ay. NV y 1872,
'POn peniIng q ie,trDn aud d c'urte
,nguage, Is disc elIua1 to the Il aud
t-serviug OF its eedsure; abp5od unAai-
Il busly.
rne committee on the judiciary rep)rtel,
SIthout express O OF npinlO1.
Ii Al. rel4t,uS - the me nbers aud GER
ain oth ;rrs Oi the General Assen1y. Flis
D,il ia ses the pay OF mem oers 10 hour dol
i4rs pr day.
Mr. Waterm N of Hyiepark, m nvei to
amend by IN tKIug the pty Of tue me
IT the legislature i've d'lars per day IN iuD
'1r all ser, ices and expense, (Ail5EIng no
nil age
Toe q -uendment and bill were favored by
Nr. Bdel OF Middleton, ami NJ. W ,tsrnaa,
1t Hydepark; opposed by Mr.. CliIds of
'ValliuE ord, Mr. Ornsbee, Ji Br4ndOn. Mr..
Pingree, ot Hartford. Mr. D ,ug as, o, Wni-
rIng. VIM N we'd the bill be dismissed
Mr.. Hen y Of Chester. wished the bill
nlg gnt be amended not to apply 60 the
present Legislature, AMI then be passed.
The II was then opposed by dr B'ttOm
pt New Haven, who thought the pay sufficient
a ".
Mr. Frisbie Of P1ultney favored the orig
'na' b / but was OppO>ei 10 amend neht.
Mr., HJwrs of West ii tven. hop u tne bill
you'd not be d,sm ssed. bat was 1ppIs. d Sd
he amendne 1t. IL W Iuid FIX the per diem
pay about a. is w pad.
Tue bill was then d.sm ssed-ayes los,
q vs. ii.