Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-14

set in the ground in field, thence south 40 eas,
| a poles, crossing the center of a sink in fsId
to q post oak, thence south 80 east 90 poles 70
the beginning, containing one hundred acres
i more or less, being the same tract of land sold
on the 9th day of March, 1867, by decree IF
theiChsncery Court of Knox county, and los
A Mabry became the purchaser; sale confirm.
ed at the April term of the Chancery Cont
1867. O'l'1
A certain tract or parcel of land, in the co,,.
ty Knox, Second Civil District, boundeJ u
| follows beginning at q small post oak corr O.
with s. Howelrs line, thence with HoweITs I;po
north ~ deg. and 30 min. west 81 poles crossinc
the spring branch to double black oak, Themes
| north p deg. and 80 min. east Al poIes t
small walnut, thence north 20 west 81 poIes 70 .
smallpost oak, thence north 40 east 20 noIos %"
stake, thence north 46 east 81 poles to a staEa
| thence south so east 81 poles to stake and non'
tiers, thence with the line OF Mrs. Morgan and
| Howell to the beginning, containing one hun
dred acres more or less being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anna Chs.
vannes, and registered in Book E. Vol. 3, page
| $50, in the Registers Office, Knox county.
! A certain tract of land situated in the Countv
| of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded a.
| follows: beginning at a stake pole east of the
| head of a spring, in the gap of ridge and cor
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south 90
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sappling
| thence south q west q poles to a post OAK
| thence north SO west 1913 poles to a hickory
bush, thence north 80 east SO poles to q black
oak, thence north 81 west I46 poles to a black
oak, thence north 81 east 104 poles TO a hickory
thence south 20 poles to small hickory, thence
east 20 poles to post oak, thence south 35 east
| 18S poles to a stake thence south 20 west Is
| poles to walnut stump, thence south AZ east q
| poles to the beginning, containg two hundred
ed to Joseph A Mabry, on the 4th day of SEN
TENDER, 1862, by John p Thompson, and regis
| tered in Book A, Vol. 5, page So
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Mabrv's
addition to Knoxville, to-wit: Nos. -, p, -
60 SO, 81 60 81, 62, g. 60, 70, IS, 1O4, los 10G
being sixteen Lots; also Lot 4 in KennedVSs,
addition to Knoxville, and ffty-six lots in Ma
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville, from No
| l to Sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ma
! bry's addition to Knoxville, to-wit;
list Range South, Nos. 80, 81, 107, 10 127
13O 49, I34 135, 133, 132, 129, 12S, 100, 1903 iii
III 1l3 IA 12S IA, 125 126, II, 2, ., %, %,
| l19, TO- 12l 122.
"a Range South, g, s., 63, Ga, 155, 158, 15a
| 1876 14l, 142 151, I52, 153, I54, 60
| 1st Range North, %, 81 10, 100, ia, III. 113
112, 49, 134, 105, 100, 118, III, 1I6 II5 127 I28
49, $780, 1885, l36, 49,, 1873, y, 19, 2S, q, 80, b.
40, JOG, 12S, I24, Us. 126.
I'd Range North, 81, SO, 81. 40, 151, 152, I5S.
100 161, 162 81, 60, 50.
2O4 acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
of Knox county, and described March l, 1862
as beginning on spanish oak, running thence
1 tlenCa
west pole to pest oak stump, thence south 80
deg west 169 poles, thence south 10 east 81
! poles to stump, thence to the beginning
being part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North of
James Bells, now Thos E Champions proper.
ty, belonging to S A Whites estate, and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabry BY
| John Williams and Craig, executors of
Sam White, March l, 1862, by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knox county. in
Book "A. Vol. Sd, page 4O1.
10 acres of land lying in the ID civil district of
Knox county and bounded and described as
follows, to wit: Beginning at a stake on the
Fair Grounds fence, running thence S 60 L L
| with said fence, thence 40 L poles with said
fence, thence s % Z Il poles with said
fence, thence 96 E 13l poles to stake corner
t to M"bry IA! and = Howell, near the branch,
line Al poles to stake Mabry's corner, thence
north 50 west Al poles with Mabry's line, to a
| stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake.
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph Mabry, April %, 1862,
| by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book t.
| Vol. Sd, page 245.
| Lots Nos. 4. 5 and 6, as designated upon the
| map of the Kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court OF Knox county, in the case of
+, w. Vanuxem and wife vs. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to Jos. A
| Mabry by ID. A. Deadericl e.. & NJ, Nav 7th
1863, by deed registered in the Registers Office
OF Knox county, IN Book +. Vol. 8, page $40.
| The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry
About 96l acres OF land lying in the 10th civil
| district of Knox county, being the same traat
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
| same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph A Mabry by Jno + Pate, guardian, &c,
| by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county, in Book Y, Volume 2, page 243.
and dated May 8, 1853. Said land adoins the
lands of Archie Walker, - Smith ant Others,
and levied On as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
in the case of L NJ Fatio VS. P Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, to-wit
No. 2,267, in the case of Brownlow s. Ross VS.
Lyon d Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
No. 2266, IN same case as next above
No. 2O65, in case of Odell 81 Mabry VS. Will
kips IL Frees, administrators.
No. 2O66, in same case as neNt above
n. ,943, in case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
VS. Chuschwell s. Armstrong.
No. ,944, in same case as next above
No. 1895, in case of Mabry s. Rule vs. Tenn
pie Harris.
No. l ,804, in some case as next above.
No. ,Sl4, In case of Jno A Williams VS. ]
Mabry ct ais.
No. 1875, in case of Jno y Williams VS. J A
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2,270, in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais VS. 6
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No. 2,269, in case of Jno f Helms ct ais VS. G
Mynatt admir-, ct ais
No. 2,OI4, in case of J A s. G w Mabry VS.
A Nee.
No, 2Ol5, in case of J A&G W Mabry vs.
A Nee.
No. 2,016, in case of A & G W Mabry v. c
A Nee.
No. !, Jos, in case of A Mabry VS. 7 Webb
admir-, &c.
No. ], 7O6, in case of A Mabry vs. T s Webb
admir-, DC.
No, 1,731, in case of A Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves
No. 1,730, in case of \ Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves
No. 1,737, in case of \ Mabry vs. james
Bell.
No. las, in case of j A Mabry VS. James
Bell.
No. 1927, in case Of A Mabry VS. Cowan,