New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1872-07-25

Barnard was 10 appoint him did not see Banari on the
subject; don't know rs told Barnard oil what "0uu
nard; tiuk gave the check Gould gave me handed
Barnard; have seen the Ere RAILWAY ehcels re
Qucntly; have often been in Barnards dlnlugrooni,
and can describe the furniture there last spring; there
has been change in that funt9Te sue tneh OF slco
1s7O don't know who made the furnturei cannot say
whether IL is black walnut It is not dark enough 1T Is
covered with brown leather ana mas monogram IN ss
shown a monogram and said 1t looked IKE That on tne
chars but il was larger; he should not think 1t was
struck from this die the general arrangement of the
monogram the same; have seen chairs in the Ere
Directory Office they covered with the mate
rail- some the chairs compare with these Of Judge
Cross-exanined by Mr.. Beach-was witness before
the Assembly Committee; must have seen them before
tbat noticed them particularly before but went
to examine them as witness; and had also examined
those IN the Erie office; am farmer; am worth over
100000 worth that when appointed receiver; have
known Barnard since bOyho0d and OF late years was IN
innate with him. lie made application 70 ne for sJO
told him would let him have It; he did not know
going TO get 1t from Gould Barnard has paid at
loan; think he paid it within two OF three months;
there understanding, direct otherwise, con-
Robert Reuter- was called and sworn: He detailed the
part he took in delivering the Erie stock belonging 10
English owners at the Erie Railway othee ior oeroa
ton; he never recovered the stock back again: ,..
Counsel for prosecution here announced that as lar as
the Erie cases were concerned the case was cosed
Arthur Johns was called and sworn was law eQub b
reporter and lawyer; know Judge Barnard ny s sgnv
very we'll have reported IN ms court snsS ioo Nv ~
every day. Mr. Beach objected to the testimony vi 'nis
g. Wc Gs SaOJ Judge de BARNARD with saying
when Judge Cerke was proposed as referee nat Nv
he had lied about him had been his enemy and mat
he favored his friends and not his enemies Counsei
SAID tins charge was not OF sunelent 1o
solemn adjudication before court OF Impeachment
He referred TO the fact that Judges were not an Ia tne
habit of using the refined and genteel language,
and claimed that such oense was not proper sun
ject Tor inquiry Counsel pursued the theme III tniS
Van Colt Re sponded He said that this was not not
in truth, "A question of manners. Judge Barnard hau
declared that he would not appoint Judge CleIke rel
cree because he said that gentleman had ed about nun
and his enemy; that his friends aud not his enc
miles, received favors from him Bdrnard) Inc question
here was them whether the Judge had not been guilty
gross misconduct in thus declaring that his friends
ana not his enemies, were to be rewarded WIN a'os
trOn him. I'll, r.. -
not an Improbable He also claimed IN reality the
Judge right in declaring that in the selection OF
referee agent represent the Court he would select
a friend ana not an enemy; not "a man VINO hdd Heu
about him. He said that IL was the duty or the Judge
only make such selection, but 10 give his reason
therefor was, indeed highly creditabe to the Judge
TO declare that no man who had lied about him, VINO
had slandered him. should act as his agent as his dele
gate, as his representative
The Court them motion OF Judge FOlger, went INTO
private consultation on the question.
On the reOpenng of the DOORS the Chair announced
that the Court had embodied It's decision III the following
ocd That the objection be cveud but without passing at
this time the question Judicial officer be mpeahed
for act other than which constitutes a crime
Arthur Johns resumed the stand aud testified TO hear
ing Judge Barnard use the language, above stated,
Judge Cerke lying about him (BarnaTd) witness
referring TO the assault upon Mr. Eaton, said Judge
Barnard, while on the bench, said, my enemies are
unfortunate, one has dropped dead, aud the other has
succeeded IN getting himself hit on the head and was
Int little 10 hard,' 1t generally reported that
Eaton was hit the head with sand bags, Eaton APP
peared IN the case Of Ramsey against Jay Could ana
others it was some little time AFTER the proceeding
before Judge Barnard, when the assault occurred
Raymond, editor OF The NeW York Tunes he died unex
pecedly The Times mad been very hostile 10 Barnard
and the Fire management.
The Court then adjourned until tomorrow, at 10
O'Clock q