The New York herald., 1872-10-31

was told 70 commit this crime He like some Others fed
Ss defsndan p tSs evidence this ssls1 rSs
ns %ss prepared saD$s s ssss and
prosecution and under the charge Of the icarned Court
i15 hardly nsea cay 70 y1n tnn 70 give an an an
the
s @ wy On TO Tins
they were not willing that you should receive 1t with
that my learned friend ir TrcInan who Is to follow
evcd utterly unprecedented il this or any other
% % s sass
ha u @ IN that MT m a Y frauds
oD S win s Mow s i st S
scnal such "harss
q asqv ssinss Ham
hs
os sa ss S dollar OF
ae sas wai s o wsy
sssn nsSs Sns nss
@
%SSS this sa:u!iIed rspaisisS; there
sn ssss saS
Es rs sa @
NJ :Ss
was % answer sss @ % s Now @
Unless you connect aVin he Evidence
Now ,seve ssHIS 5ss tSG Counsel made this
sssYhsf a
lace e face with NJ; Hail %as unable ..uS e
SsfP%ss y R;ss. s
learned counsel but the result o the motive power
Inc sag
d who on ss e e y e% aa as %aSs s
fs @ a P n 5 s Sa haa r %ee% aSs %si In
recipient Of this money and connved at this fraud
too low II connection @ :, Win II and no social disability
have better
5 hsy Ss. e Ss ssr ssydl mad
$IS he do when these charges, nTst appsaTssdi !
sss ss esd %Ss Sssn IN q 'Ss,, SsVssp
$ sS
% sn G that Tn, s oas s g
5 that he walking in h oSss Of
% a e sye Ia, these D s
that accounts Of this kind Of work,
sd h aa c the paror
TS enlarge din and g
the proposon mat any Obligation was resting on him
ne m
he had failed to suspect his fellow ofceri And when
soe tS are for
's
5 had i
am glad 70 return to the old fashion Of returning
. u
has addressed whether the receiving Of present
and he has replied Ifi not Sae agree with him.
ns n 81 hs s Sh @ Aa a %S S 5 fa
we made a o pfq sSHs and
MI sTs
Mr. m H % % aRa Hsa % ss e
n.S s. ss SsnS
sf a H. n at s a
duty g audit the account MI Han tses ,hIs warrant
sSls work done; Twas Se Esglnesf q t$s Grc!on
s n Lad a' ss'''n'
what inersSss as STsw o$ sa
s psa s 81 W % a s
III, was-6eoaass he received in ISL knew
@ esS d%sn that
asafs S w
that of Mr. smedey It did seem unlikely that Il Mr.
Ely rs really don't sH svidenae @
y y ao ha f sT NILES MI S1 sa @
went through the several counts Of the Indictment.
1t being now hafpast one, recess was taken.
After the Recess.
Mr.. stoughton resumed dealing with the statute
defining what is wilful neglect OF Official duty. In
this connection ne said:-
Sy r s w S Sa
statute but performing performs Without sin
& % E ast s s aSt Board o sa
met met they d the @ e
sersd copies such Been ob
April rs $50 with certeate showing that such jads.
o
81 Audit n pursuance Of that resoutonthe resolution
claims would be acted on by the Board suppose such
ing them Just and CO ding e the and
sS saSk nap o
q sHa sssse sss asssTns sSs% Il ssserasnss
oa he
an oences Now i he had refused to sign them and viii
la1sa aaa sns qnH
T @ bis % audit that NO
Ss ssSss
5-dstemining what should be the quality and
of to satisfy them the correctness of the claims
and without which they would not look at bil-that
that was proceeding contrary TO law, antamount
cfusa to perform the act OF auds suppose that all the
bills had been lair and just according to the theory Of the
prosecution the alleged offence would still exist because
the fairness unairness OF the bills is not In ques
tion. The charge Is that he refused to audit As said
there could be suit brought against the county
the law declared the Board Of Supervisors be supreme
Audit had 70 deal with old bills and Il was the
best evidence OF the correctness OF these bills that Mr.
Hall framed the resolution, which adopted by
Board Of Audit Of which he was member. That reso.
luton said We require the County Auditor sworn
ofcer to put his stamp on the bills after their business
had been determined We require the County Auditor to
bring to US every bill that has been passed by the
Board OF Supervsors-the only tribunal having power
audit and allow the claims to be brought against the
county For suit could be brought against the county
the Board OF Supervisors alone having the de-
ermine what claims just and should be paid The
Board Of Audit exacted by that resolution thatthe
ELLIS SHOULD BE AUTHENTICATED
and their approval certified by the Of the Board
asserted that the Board Of Aydit had no rht ke yt