New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1872-04-19
OARDOZO'S CORRUPTION.
ARGUMENT OF THE Bar ASSOCIATION CON.
LTTEE.

CONsprRATOR-THK ERIE INJUNCrIoNs-hE-
CEIcERsHIP ROBBERIEs - GRAFT NAihAN
PAYMENTS TO MS PATRON - ILLEGAL 4"
PRIsONMENT-ILLEGAL RELEASES
The Committee of the Bar Association for
vsrted yesterday 10 the Judiciary Committee 'hel1
argument in the Of the charges preferreo asass
Judge Cardozo. Tie following summary c"h'"ps ~"
principal points: ,.
Of legislative inquiry. charged with -yenatls ana
Wilfnl violation Of the laws IN the interest OF personal
saS Sy Se
unarscs Seore them they have been such peculiar
rr,toIs with some Of the ltiSsnts as to "sy tn, be-
lief that hGI decisions s TSa not y,
valuable presents. FROM .e ntigants in whose favor
Cat DIZZY have received sometimes in the name Of loans
sometimes in the name OF III. SOM times a rH r .
sHms Of money from those favored lticants. Judge
Hopknson impcachcd for the suggestion OF rres,
desgnatc as agent Prize under the control Of
ae.t cY nGt for Ss as
had received we're either contrary to law or dTerent
DSs shown @ 5asa rendered
secs1n conary to the merits of ,he cause rsuo2e e
from office, and disqualified TO hold on,re,
T S1 s ads COME Within e ."
court All the mischief which can be produced rSent SS
snc S ra% Mt Sy judges " strike at the very oun
datons III dicia purity aud destroy pubic sonaenvo
pol:o Who are suffers may make presents Of sump
tuous furnture; receivers ana their counsel the pro-
nc unes estates IN court followed by mysterious a 1I
scr,nnt What chance viii the poor adverse gants
have aud what merry will lie shown TO estates a,!ls
)ndcesi Justice has been symboled as bindtohied.
iai she might by the inner sight, discern only Tue
p4si,s for prciudccs against the persons OF her
sios. rut 10y The rev jueiai Inversion IT. Is nrGT c
sit the parties and be blndfoded only lis 10 INC
Ccnpiai,t has been made that hearsay testimony was
iN'tl
fstneorsdg testimony, that ~ NJ, Gd,r,n was c",tea o
tssony a'crrard reeetd ,cas eiren by Mr. tm u o.
e% a9 'nano' InS ",9ccb sc made in spport
vi he charge. crs 40 h, hcarsay testimony 1t
tac,ed es'mcGy of witnesses having personal knowi
q. thc i.c,s 10 which they I"r"' d. We resi- upoA
-" ircl' - ii' ne.
iar colD Co>sTr,rY.
Tive fir c'., - a,aiust JIlGe CaIdozO relates 10 The
piracy 81 FAX. jay Could. AID oilers, III Inc
IA, 81 ;Ss, 10 the price oiGod ana charge with
differences parties uua'le {" make deliveries
ior outstanding contracts. We claim to have slo'
santiatod by proof the whole detail n that charge viz
VT TIE price ot gold having suddenly fallen on the 2Nn
sep:.inhcr che memorable "Elach Friday } ron ~
IA i:3 Whereby Gould. FIX and their allies would have
eu red enormous losses in the ordinary course OF settle
a.. red cat through The eI rara order. made
y, Judge CGrio'o In the snN "t lnrr "fC"cit;;
s1verai millions 70 winch They were lqnc their
tacs. TIE .,o'd transactions of thht day Ut the COD
q. collars wcr, made eu jet the rules for cernccs
Gold Exchange Bank aud lin case of disputed to
s,tr,iions ny ti. 't"iulttee Of tie Gold EAthanse
buicr rs Jaws. Js.re Coriozos Order. enjoiGii:
r. c hand. OF RescTer ptevenied The ciearances
hie order enjoin'ng the Arbitration Committee from
.L+age prercntrd !hc enforcement 81 ,etensn; anh
d~aiiy appeared before tho Judge, aud which he
Ir.dr Tie oidcrs Gid noi Warrant the InaAiHg Of the
rri,,s A. atteIn,r MAS made justify thc making OF
o:,..,- we're ,ua,ie by i.e other Juds-
D. ro other jade appointed Receive; 4"d
I,unc,,c, we've .'ated by the o'hef judge: diic'-
- state " 'N,ts "ud having n'r limited r!"r',ion
r., .l~,s hcforo Jrhgc tartozo rri"l@' hui i.a not
el''is how h, in>ol.en,y 81 Tue hanh Which n
Tee a,>ninptlon thd IT va in+oNrnt me Court ma
,o authority anoiNhd /" di>iose :" 7; assets ctrcJd IN
,' ~, trni ,",1"'irn, rae .,isc" reduce ID.
81, TO iii, oil'uus q m'yns violated lhe law 10y tie
,.i,, Violating tre law by hi. order for She dts
o. ;ioi assets. he Jays bank insav"nt
iadc, ,ardoYu hal dccii.t that ne bank inso!S
I'D, 10 the very statutes winch require the
T ,hc c~'.,icr: rI".i,. In ,ce OF tle positive
i'r'nddis The "alcs OF the corporation 10 make
rrerrenccs 10 he '.c of tic -tI"e requiring ti" re-
'.t"r to pay the q ''i"is ,iniy tH J"d;r ten DAYS
80 hc aIpoDtcu To receiver. aud whc The s1ea'cs'
exc n'' pre- sied III bls ness circles. r'ncd largely
nv Ot NJ" tank. made order for the re-
ak N otv.r'- hands Ia .wo favored rrcdors m
IL a. Ielrr'Di'y,s having Tie otherwise large in-
,,e rec I.r and nis coa,tr Vii il be- ,cI .ou,iy
Eating The lS Ia lie interest oi THESE i@t'i'd ,""le oi
rHr rRu INJUNCTION.
The Englisl In. STOCK Reccvershi intcs tig'rd IN
The Inquiry against iadsc Barnard preceded lay
ell,ive SUIT brought iy \! against the Erc Rail-
way Company Heath. aud others III which Judge
Bari.,rd made all p1rtc injunction order, requiring
the Company lis books against al transfers
sJ.H. IL mat this sui instigatcd ny the
The handa ring OF one Morgan a CLERK 10 law de-
parincnt OF that corporation: The complaint pre-
nder whose "uSlace. a. nia',hs a,oiney' ne snt
T. -
holders 81 foreign stock would eonspre to continue the
nSieT sh.. act, and ha, i.janciioI
siosing the stock mooks asanrt, 'ra,sfer-' was
Holders whose fights had been impaired by
a S%1s a%s G.rdcsa on behalf Of Se Tnc x
borders andavits To dissolve the Injunction. The
% . @ an% ss ess Mene 5Ie cG
rapsciously seized by Mr. Fisk aud his party:
S.a ding SOW The burden Of ths great consta.
,rnai point lay heavy on tie judicial mind q judge
,c+afed the defendants could not move on shdayii-
S%S cosS the Oe
soise aiiei putting in their answer and after some
'onh, delay despsring Of any decision iy Judge Car
) BRADY, who promptly dissolved the Injunction.
~" Nyee proved % be the .wordash Who Rsoedss the
J, Ss y Judge
pa y held o. 10 The position until re,n'orsements
.s Of the situation Perhaps the delay in this
case not without its parallel for Mr. Ciratx Nathan
Wood which certain favortes OF Judge Cardozo were
on Que sa@ he spp.srsd on the and d the Judge liza
Aiy disC The Judge which is surprising considering
, certain 't9r divisions proved la this Investigation
HrCEVEhsiIP ROBBERY.
IrIAe lsse az Bovine against IAveridge IN which tho
,,;s ought TO open the account. trustees aud re-
I've readjusted. and aside AL agree
sent under which large real estate had been divided,