Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1872-02-06
LAW REPORT.

First .ChsnesrT Ceurt--MOrgsn, Chan
cekIoE.
The following decisions were rendered
| yesterday: Hsrkresder vs Kellsr; Brooks
vs. Gibson; Oliver VS. Mclean; Plummer
vs. Myers. The reading Of the evidencs
IN the cas5 Of Nelson VS. Trigg was fin-
ishod yesterday, after which Mr.. Kor-
trscbt argued ths case for plaintiff The
srgOment viii be resumed this morning.
Second Uhaneery Court - ChaneelIor
se0tL-
Chancellor Scott calls the attention of
attorneys and htigants to the following
rule adopted by the chsnceiiOrs and leg
islsture, which win hereafter be strictly
enforced, and no case considered unless
the same is complied with: RULE 10-Sec
tiOn i: The complainant or his solicitor,
before presenting a cause for hearing,
snail cause ell the depositions and other
pspsrE intended 20 be used by him on the
trial, except the plesdings, to be nestly
put together in one or more packages and
securely fastened st the top, and the same
psged and general index of the contents
made st the conclusion or beginning
thereof The defendant or his solicitor
shall, in ike msnner, prepare all papers
and depCsitiOns intended to be used by
him. Section 2-When 8 case is called
the court brief. written in ink, plainly
showing the point in the case raised by
tAs pleadings and proof together with
the authorities relied on in the argument;
0 herwise, tie ccurt may an its discretion
ielsy the hearing until these two rul,'s
are complied with.
The following decisions were rendered
yesterday: STATE OF Tennessee vs Groves;
Levy VS. Boyle; FriCk VS. Uhl; Burleson
" Msachsm, To-day Is motion day.
-'rsG Cireuit COuFt-Hefsken. Judge.
The entire calendar was called yester-
day. The case of Francisco q Virgins
Us Brinklsy is now on trial. After It is
d!sp0sed Of the following csses will be
called iOr trisl, VIZ 1875 Ferguson VS.
Il ma Lie Insurance company; 1855 lien
vs. Rose; 1890 IGsn vs Schloss; 1900 Gay.
lord. Son q Co. vs. Memphis and Arksn-
sss River Packet company; 1910 Izsn VS.
German National bank; 1912 Harrington,
agent, vs. Moon; 1920 Williamsvs Suech.
jim; 1922 Carter vs. Bragg ct al; 1881 Dick
iEson, Wnhscls & Co VS. Roots, Vsncs &
90; 1886 EiCabsTg, use, VS. Beehler; 1887
Sutton, Trigg g. Co. vs. Warren & Co, 1888
Wright vs. st0ddsrd; I54l Hsdden &
Avery VS. Slater; I64S Morgan VS.
Fsr-Ow; l544 West vs. Irby; 1916 Diggs |
ct I'll VS. Planters Insurance company;
1917 Allen VS. Planters Insurance COM
Psny; l54S BuTch vs Wild ct al.
CrIuaiaal COurt-Fnppin, Judge.
The following cases srs set for trial to, |
dsy. Witnesses snd defendants on bonds |
must he 10 attendance promptly. 3OS |
John Granth3ua, receiving stolen goods; /
46s K Bsuman, - Hepry Cohen, false |
pEstences; 513 W. w. Kingdom, gaming /
house; 5S6 A Kohiby, 6O6 W. II. Mill |
kens larceny; 62l Joseph Coll, selling lot
terry tickets; 736 James Rsnfrow, lsroeny;
737 Phil OsvsBangh murder; 76S Peter /
Harrison, assault with intent 20 commit
murder; rs Simon j. Knott, perjury; 7S2
Robert Rsasonover, carrying concealed
weapons; 500 William GroYsnberry, sos L
F. 81. Nickols, larceny; Sl3 L H. Psdden,
murder; SIS Michael Cooney, attempt to
Kill; $50 Henry Jamison, attemps to kill;
S8l, Jack Pailips, sstempt to rape; 8S4
Frsnk Hail, malicious stsbbing; 8SS
James Cornell, perjury; GIL Bau-
msn, carrying concealed weapons;
Ola J. A. HeOnte, false pretences:
SIS J. a Spears, sEsgult and battery; 92S
Lou Walters, 92S l. Q. MeAllister, 928 e.
Wolf and wife, attempt to XII 959 VIM.
Tanner, 979 A. II Lecoq, 9SS ,. Brown,
1913 Gus AlthOuse. keeping gar ng house;
l042 Belle Ward, 1850 Maggie B ton, 1867
Lou Fisher, 1852 Jane Young keeping
Oawdy house; II1S Nick E5chev ae, LII,
$. b, Robins, ll29 James Kerzsr, 1lSS -
Meyers, ll40 q Gslens, retailing on Sun
day; 1875 Matthew Dsvis, 1l90 Louis Gar
reneens, attempt TO kill; 1894 Mrs Corren,
1877 Peter MentSes, 1870 Thomas Win
,ers, lzQ4 John Mare, 1905 G.. WSch-
ter, lzO6 F. Rsvslski, 1913 Mrs. Kin
celia, 1918 Henry Lubrmann, l2lS
CHARLES Meyers, 1920 Herman Caro-,