The New York herald., 1872-10-29

s %sySr ss s ssT unjust s.
~ When went to the Broadway Bank you said
coupe and You spoke OF taking It The Comptrolicrs
Office The psce odeposit was on Mr. watons desk was
%aS S yS sys that to twice
81 when You said you went over 70 divide the money
O. That you said to one of the jurors and you don't
tend 70 include him now A. No, sir do not
Those conyersations that you spoke q were matters
aHe hH,e M they are very fresh On my mind for
% You conversation with Mayor Hall in YES
like @ yoaio i ABOUT about what nf ilms sfp M i
Wei, twas about the ir commencement OF this excite
mn g. wers a. s fore part S coua mark the
L Does yoar memory recall near which office i was;
my back rpsa 70 j. think ad , been e The sHsry
p ssy Es nYsn you to the
Sss
s me hs ana M fs Ps 1
to know Il the yoa had on the vesibulc was
yoa afs the in the ONCE
Vs. Ss;sS r. 'sss
A. Well, was stopping at Long Island these
getting under my
the 0e gess a o
CscarFea in 's inner ,ss pSsi Yes M
On the aist Of September, 1871 il that satdr-
O. Did name appear in the list of when
you ef' A. No. sir; Tdid not leave willingly can tell
O. When did you come back to the United statess A.
am ns o lie hn on the
when nay ad g ypp sal from England On the "a Of
Have prossssnss been taken against you BY or
oena Hf s Psope a U owa 1s knowledge
don't know anything about Them.
g. Al ta events you have not Been arrested A. NO.
Have you eye, had With the
A; testimony SIT =. ,.,o ..a .onvo~so.,on.
with Pc Sss 81 ss 4. Of Us
aS resumed-o Down to what period have
people, since the adjournment Of this Court on Friday
Redirect examination by Mr.. Peckham-Have you
been working for the city about fifteen yearss A. Yes
O. Mr. Tweed was Supervisor during that time A. Yes
You spoke of having open accounts in The latter part
S wR mos e oSs os s % IN
ase wssn
NS ;ir 70 the best of my knowledge don't reco
scnysrsti9 9,, win s Mr. 4n.s Ms
ws i
By the courtThe accounts We're published time
take ihs %la iSs SsSers steS
showed i to Mr. ngerso there was little fox on the
Mr. Peckham-o What was the value Of the present.
EVIDENCE OF THOMAS LOVE.
Mr.. Thomas Love, an employe OF the New YORK
"a % and g. in which % statements G Of city accounts
were published.
Mr.. John II. Masters0n was called and SubSe-
quently Mr.. R. s. Storrs and Mr.. Anson Z. Park
hurst, paying teller Of the Broadway Bank. Their
evidence was excluded by the Court on the ground
that II was irrelevant as regarded the accused.
Mr.. Masterson was to show the value OF the plaster
OF accounts of the Court House construction prior
to April, 1870, ana Mr.. Parkhurst that certain
account OF Mr.. woodward and Mr.. Tweed.
EVIDENCE OF FRIEDRICH G.. sMEDLEY
~ Mr smedisy said he was a. o. 1seI = ana nd
Tweed's ofce at IS Duane street and there met Mr..
OF the Board OF Apportfonment; Mr. Hall left the
room and he said to Mr.. Garvey, II am very sorry
a9 anyms o On n M aey
said to the Mayor that 'he hopeu that transaction
would not make any difference In their relations;"
Mr.. Hall replied, 81 suppose not. II was business
transaction' afterwards received instructions not
to press the suit and to give the defendant time;
nothing has ever been done about IL.
This closed the evidence for the prosecution.
After a short consultation, Mr.. Slaughter asked
the counsel for the people whether they intended,
on that evidence, to press for conviction.
MIR. Peckham said that, answering for himself, he
certainly did upon all the accounts, except lnger-
soils and Eollar's. He relied on Garvey's, David
sons and Keyser's accounts.
Mr.. Buckley asked that the recess might then
take place. and the Court was adjourned until half
past one, IL being understood that Mr.. Buckley
would open the defence on the reassembling OF the
Court.
After the Recess.
The counsel for the defence held a consultation
In the court room until halfpast two and then
Judge Brady said he thought 1t would be better to
adjourn for the day, and upon that the Court ad
journed until this morning at eleven O'Clock.
The, prosecution had Just before the recess de-
that Mr.. Hall assented to or was participau0r In
the division of the plunder. The proof, therefore,
was under the following section OF the statute:-
SECTION ss-when any duty Is shall be enjoined by
any public trust or employment every wn neglect to
pefior m such duty ss shall be misdemeanor pun.
At twenty minutes past two O'Clock the Judge
arrived and explained that the delay was Occa-
stoned by the wish OF the counsel at either side %
consult. The consultation was In reference to an
had not been able to arrive at any conclusion and
as the hour was SO late the Court would be ad-
journed TO the following morning.
tent made ,ip for the duiness OF the proceedings
during the morning session. Speculation was OF
course, busy in accounting for the adjournment
and the nature OF the consultation referred to.
Nothing could be cliclted from counsel on either
side beyond the statement that they were consult
ing on n point OF law to be submitted, and which,
If ruled upon by the Court in favor OF the views
taken by the counsel for the defence, would bring
the case to speedy termination
THE BOULEVARD AND UPTOWN