Staunton vindicator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1860-1896, 1872-08-30

The following cases have been argued before
the Court of Appeals
Crawford and al. as. Grams Elk ors and all
Suit reversed Us. the person al representatives of
several appellees who have died.
Ambrose Heirs Us Keller and al.-Moton
dockeed and continued until the case is regu-
larly called upon this docket.
The Winchester Building Association as. Gil
bert and al Motion docketed and continued
until case is regularly called upon the docket.
Wilson and wife and ais. us Smith-upon
supersedeas to decree of Circuit Court of Au-
gusta-argued by Fultz for appellants, and Bald
win for appe!lees-time aiken by the Court to
consider.
Lockridge us. Lockridge-
Harris &C., vs. Fulton's h1'or-Rules award
ed u.s. the appellan Is to show cause why they
should not execute new bonds with s.. fi,.ient
security.
Poague as Greenlee's hers-upon motions to
rehear these causes -rehearing allowed.
Beery and al. Us Trick and al.-Motion by one
of the appellants to remove this case to the Cir
cult Court of the United States for Western Dis
trict of Virginia. Motion argued by Ju dge
Futz for appellants and Col. Baldwin for APP
pellees.
Newton's Ex'or as. Bushong and al Motion
by three of the appellees to remove this cause to
| the Circuit Court of the U. S. for the Western
District of Virginia. Motion fully argued by
Judge Fultz for appellees, and Judge Shelley for
| appellants, and time taken by the Court for
| consideration.
S. Fl Hilb, for, &c, as. j. B. Peyton and al
| upon re-hearing of supersedeas to Judgment
| of the Circuit Court of Augusta-argued by Geo.
| NJ. Cochran, Esq, counsel for plaintiff and Col.
| Baldwin for defendants. Further argued by
Col Baldwin for the Defendants and by Judge
| Fultz for Plaintiff-Time taken by the Court for
| consideration.
| Phelps adm r rs. Seeley's admir- and al.-Su-
persedeas to decree of District Court for 5h Ju-
dcial District. Re-argued by Hon. A. H. H.
Stuart for appellant and Judge Fultz for appel
| lee, and time taken by the Court for considera-
| ton.
Poague as. Greenlee's heirs, &c,-upon su-
persedeas to decree of Ro ckbridge Circuit Court
and re-argument commenced by Judge Broken
brough for appellants.
| Upon the petition of VIM Skeen, Admir- of
| Samuel V. Gatewood, dec'd-Appeal allowed
| and supersedeas award I'd to decree Bath
| Circuit Court.
al. as. Trick and al. from this Court 10 the U. S.
| Circuit Court, for the Western District Of Va,
were over-ruled unanimously.
The following decisions were rendered
Erwin u.s. Luckett's Admir- and al.-Superse-
IDEAS to a decree of Bath Circuit Courto-Decree of
| Circuit Court substantially affirmed.
McClung's Admir- vs. Eryin-Supersedeas to
Judgment Of Highland Circuit Court-Judgment
of Circuit Court reversed, with costs-remanded
for further proceedings.
Wilson'S Admir- u.s. Barclays Ex'or and al
| Superseleas to decree of Rockbridge Circuit
Court-Decree reversing and dismissing with
| costs
Wilson and wife and al vs. Smith--Superse-
| IDEAS to decree of Augusta Circuit Court-De-
1 cree of Circuit Court affirmed.
Eagle ard al vs Hook upersedeas to Judg-
ment of Highland Circuit Court-Judgmeat Of
| Circuit Court affirmed.
Larue rs. Cloud Supersedeas to Judgment OF
Clarke Circuit Court-Judgment Of Circuit
Court affirmed.