Shenandoah herald. [volume] (Woodstock, Va.) 1865-1974, 1872-05-09

Urleleys nomnstiop Is acceptable to usi
we cannot admit. aud We are not ye.
| prepared to say that we will support him
Should The Democratic Conven ton en-
dorse him. OR fail 10 make nomination
then, as between him and Grant, or any
other nominee of the Philadelphia Lon-
ventlon. we expect to throw whatever Of
influence We may possess 10 his favor.
The Lynchburg Nrginian says: Cnedor
compeis US to say that this is not the
best or strongest nom nation that cou Id
have been made, neverth less, as between
Greedy and Grant, or any OF the corrupt
Ring that now dominates ut Washington,
we could not hesitate to give our support
to the former.
NEW YORK
The Post (Rep of Saturday afternoon
opposes Grceley''s nomination N very
severe article. 1t says: 'He lacks the
courage irmness and consistency which
are required in the Chief Mag trate of
the nation. Greeley's political associations
and intlmacies are so bad that We can
expect nothing from him, in case, to his
own misfortune and ours. he should be
elected, but corrupt administration of
affairs
The Stats. Zei'ung says Greeley aud
Brown are good men, and are liked by
both the Americans and Germans in til is
country; but that if A 'ams had been
nom mated they would have been better
sati.fied.
The Sunday Nevs. Ben. Woods pa
per, contains leader strongly endors-
ing the Cincinnati tnohiuees ami plat
fern.
New York. May 5.-The Brooklyn
Eagle (Democratic) warmly endorses the
Cincinnati nom limitations.
PENNSYLVANIA.
The Philedclpllia Press, edited by Col
onel Forney, says:
Mr.. Greeley can never in our judy
ment, be President. His path to that
em!neace is made rough, not by. objec-
lions SO mush as by obstacles, if we may
employ the expression.
Tie Inquirer (Republicau) says: 1t is
a good thing for ones conscience to be
4 Radical, but it is not conducive to ones
popularity, and Mr.. Greeley being
t.adical we are not curtain that more
conservative candidate would not have
answered better the purposes OF the Gin
cinnati Con veniou.
The Erenixg Telegraph (Rep) says
the Democratic rejection OF Greedy, which
seems inevitable. would cause complete
Republican reunion
The Eyening Bulletin styles the nom
nations ridiculous news, and says months
are before Us in which to work the rich
mines of this Ridiculous conclusion. LIE,
US laugh.
The Pittsburg Post (Dem. } says:
If the management of the liberal move
ment ever expected to enlist the >uppprs Of
the Dem ooratic party, they could not have
adopted plan better calculated to make
it impossible. than TO have nomin ated the
ticket that they did. We ri>k nothing
in saying that Mr.. Greedy will not re-
ceiyc any Democratic support.
The Cincinnati convention having rem
dered a coalition of all the clements OF
oppos it on to corruption impossible, must
now work out it's own salvation as best it
can. The path Of duty is plain before
the eyes of Democracy-they will nom
mate good and true men, and accomplish
FIR themselves what might have been
jointly accomplished by tae Democr acy
an the Liberal Republi ans-the over
throw of the Grant Dynasty of corruption
and usurpstion.
The Harri> burg Patriot Dem. } says:
, For the Liberal Republicans this must
be regarded as strong nomination.
With Greedy as fheir candidate they en-
ter the field epcrs eticslly against the
administration suemy. neither giving
nor taking quarter.
The iancaster Inteiligencer says;
T he Cincinnati Convention; in select
ing Mr.. Greedy as its standard bearer
have not apparently been Influenced by a
desile TO secure tor their candidate the
endorse mont of the Democratic Conyen-
ten.
The Richmond Dispatch says: The
two waves of opposition, with their pow
erful impulse, met a, Cinc'nnsti, and she
two prominent men who gave them start
seemed to ride upon them until they were
merged in one, and selected as the nom
inees under whose auspices the cause was
to be casred onward with every promise
ef brilliant victory.
TIE Wing says: We cannot imag inc
that the Democracy will hesitate a mo-
meDt about supporting this ticket-a
ticket that W i'll strike the administration
with terror. and cause proscriptive and
malignant Radicalis,n to tremble. We OF
Virginia, who availed ourselves of liber-
alism in our memorable State canvass Of
1869, cannot With any show of consisien-
oy. refuse our sanction to it in the open
ing Presidential canvass. It saved our
Common ealth - let it now save the ma
linn