Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-15

on the 9th day of March, 1867. by decree oO, oS
thesChancery Court of Knox county, and Jos
A Mabry became the purchaser; sale confirm
ed at the April term of the Chancery Conf
1867.
| A certain tract or parcel of land, in the com,
| ty of Knox, Second Civil District, bounded o.
follows beginning at a small post oak corn o.
with s. Howelps line, thence with HowelPs line
north ~ deg. and 80 min. west 81 poles crocs;r
the spring branch to double black oak, Themes
north q deg and 80 min. east Al pOIes r. .
small walnut, thence north 20 west 81 poles fo q
small post oak, thence north 45 east 20 poles foS
stake, thence north 46 east "a poles to stake,
thence south 80 east 81 poles to stake and poin,
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs. Morgan and
Howell to the beginning, containing one hun
dred acres more or less; being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anna Cha
vannes, and registered in Book T.. Vol 8. pace
| $50, in the Registers Office, Knox county.
| a certain tract of land, situated in the COUNTY
| of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded a,
follows: beginning at a stake pole east of the
head Ola spring, In the gap of a ridge and cor
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south 60
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sappling.
thence south q west % poles to post oak
| thence north 80 west 1913 poles to q hickory
bush, thence north so east So poles to a black
OAK, thence north 81 west 146 poles to black
oak, thence north 81 east 104 poles to a hickory
thence south 76 poles to a small hickory, thence
east 6O poles to q post oak, thence south 35 east
lS8 poles to stake thence south 20 west Is
poles to walnut stump, thence south AZ east rs
| poles to the beginning, containg two hundred
acres more or less, being the same tract convey
ed to Joseph A Mabry, on the 4th day of Sen,
tember, 1862 by John P Thompson, and regis
| tered in Book A, Vol 8. page $50.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Mabry,g
addition to Knoxville, to-wit: Nos y, q, ~
80. SO, 81, 60 81, 81, g. 60, 10 So, IO4, los los
| being sixteen Lots also Lot 4 in Kennedy
addition to Knoxville and ffty-six lots in Ma
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville, from No
| to Sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ma
bry's addition to Knoxville, to-wt
1st Range South, Nos; 80, 81, 10Y, 40, 127,
$50, 131, I34, 135, 1873, 1872 129, 12S 109 los mi
~ 1lS, ia, 12S 124 rs, 126, II, ., %, % %
ID Range South, 43, 81, 63, Ga. 155. las 10
156, al, 142, Isl, l52, 153 154 60
1st Range North, q, 81, %, 100, III, III, 113.
129, $50, 135, 1876, 137, 1873, p, 49, %, o. SO, &
49, 106 123, 124 125, 126
I'd Range North, 81, SO. 81 40 I51, I52, 15S
154, 155, 156, 157. 15S, 139, A. 14S I49 $50 l5q
160, 161, 162, 64, SO, So.
204 acres of land lying in the ID Civil District
of Knox county, and described March l. 1862
as beginning on Il spanish oak, running thence
north AZ deg. and l53 min. east 1877 poles. thence
west pole to post oak stump, thence south 50
deg. west 100 poles, thence south 10 east 38
poles to a stump, thence to the beginning
being part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North of
James Bells, now ThOs E Champions proper
ty, belonging to A Whites estate, and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabry BY
John Williams and j J Craig, executors of
Sam A White, March l. 1862 by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knox county, in
Book A. Vol. Sd, page 40l.
10 acres of land lying in the I'd civil district Of
Knox county and bounded and described as
follows, to wit: Beginning at a stake on the
Far Grounds fence, running thence S 50 E Z
poles with said fence, thence AZ Z II poles
with said fence, thence S 40 Z 8 poles with said
fence, thence % E q poles with said
fence thence N 90 E Is! poles to a stake corner
to Mabry and Howell, near the branch,
, thence North % East with Mabry's
! line Al poles to stake, Mabry's corner, thence
north IS west Al poles with Mabry's line. to a
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake,
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry, April %, 1862,
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book K.
. Vol. 3d. page 245.
, Lots Nos. 4. and g. as designated upon the
map of the Kennedy property file in the
, Chancery Court of Knox county, in the case OF
+. w. Vanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to Jos. A
> Mabry by d. A. Deaderick, g. & NJ, May 7th
1868, by deed registered in the Registers Office
of Knox county, in Book +. Vol. g. page $40
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
, property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 981 acres of land lying in the 10th civil
! district of Knox county, being the same tract
!. ION which George w Mabry now lives, and the
, same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph A Mabry by-Jno Pate, guardian, &c.
by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county, in Book I, Volume ., page 243.
, and dated May 3, 1853. Said land adjOins tho
! lands of Archie Walker, = Smith anG others,
> and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
: The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
: property will be sold arc rs follows:
) One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
: in the case of l. NJ Fatio VS. p Fatio ct ais, and
: the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, to-wit Z:
No. 2,267, in the case Of Brownlow s. Ross vs.
Lyon d Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
, No. 1855, in same case as next above.
: No. 2O65, in case of Odell g. Mabry VS. Will
kiDs s. Freels, administrators.
No. 2OG6, in same case as next above.
Z n. ,S43, in case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
! VS. Chuschwell s. Armstrong.
! No. ,9H, in same case as next above.
I No. 1906, in case of Mabry & Rule vs. TEN
+ pie Harris.
No. 1904, in some case as next above.
9 No. ,814, in case of Jno A Williams VS. J A
n Mabry ct ais.
: No. 1,815, in case of Jno y Williams vs. j 4
| Mabry eft ais.
No. 2270, in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais vs. 6
: Mynatt, admir- ct ais.
No. 2,269, in case of Jno Helms ct ais vs. 6
4 Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
a No. 20l4, in case of J A & g w Mabry vs. {
= No. 2O15, in case of j A s. G w Mabry Vs. c
y A Nee.
\ No. 2O16, in case of j A s. G w Mabry '. c
y A Nee.
No. 1,7O5, in case of J. \ Mabry vs. T S Webb,
h admir- &c.
No. /, 706, in case of ] A Mabry vs. Z s Webb,
f admir-, &C.
y No. !, 731, in case of j a Mabry vs. Geo Mar
i graves.
f No. 1,730, in case of j A Mabry VS. Geo Mar
Z; graves.
No. 1857, in case of A Mabry VS. james
Bell.
n No. LBS, in case of A Mabry VS. james
L Bell
a No. 1927, in case of J A Mabry VS. Cowan
), | McClunp Il Co.