Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-07

set in the ground in a field, thence south 40 e.s,
| q poles. crossing the center of sink in field
TO post oak, thence south 80 east So poles ~
the beginning, containing one hundred acre,
more or less, being the same tract of land soIJ
on the 9th day of March. 1867, by decree &c
the:Chancery Court of Knox county sand los
A Mabry became the purchaser; sale con6rUS.
ed at the April term of the Chancerv Cor.
| 1867. 00iir"
| A certain tract or parcel of land. in the oo,,-
ty of Knox, Second Civil District boundeJI
follows beginning at a small bost oak corr a.
with 5. Howells line, thence with HowelPs line
north 70 deg. and 80 min. west 81 poles cross;n
the spring branch to double black oak tbonoss
north % deg. and 80 min. east Al. poles ~
small walnut, thence north 20 west 81 poIes 20 I"
small post oak, thence north 40 east 20 poIee 10"
stake, thence north IS east "a poles to a stake
thence south so east 81 poles to stake and nom,
ters thence with the line of Mrs. Morgan and
Howell to the beginning, containing one hun
dred acres more or less; being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anna Cha.
vannes. and registered in Book T. VOL 8. pare
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox county.
A certain tract of land, situated in the Countv
OF Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded a,
follows: beginning at stake pole east of the
mead OF spring, in the gap of ridge and cor
ner with the VIM. Swan farm thence south 60
west ~ poles to pine and black oak sapplinr
thence south q west % poles TO n most oaf
Ihence north 90 west 1913 poles to a hickory
bush thence north 80 east Sc poles TO a bIock
oar, Cnence north 81 west 146 poles to a black
oar, tnence north "a east 104 poles 70 hickory,
tnence south 76 poles to small hickory theme
east 6O poles to post oak, thence sont6 * cost
loo pores 10 a stake, thence south 20 west rs
poles to walnut stump thence south AZ east D;
pores 10 Sqe og S c9ntang two hundred
ed to Joseph A Mabry, on the 9TH Do 90 SoSS
TENDER, 1867, by John z Thomson Srd 80
tered in Book A, Vol. 8, page So.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Mabrv,s
edition sd IL to % h n e lie t9,wt Nos 81 o.
being sixteen Lots also Lot in Kennedy
addition to Knoxville. and fiftv-six lots in No
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville, from No
to Sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ms-
bry'S addition to Knoxville to-wit;
1st Range South, Nos 80, 81, 10Y. 10 19-
130 13l, "a, 135, 133, 132, 10 128 l09 los iii
H. 113, ia, 123, 124 12j, 12G, Il, y, % 28 ~
10, 40, III, I'D.
ID Range South, 43, 81, G3, Ga, 155, 15S 80
49, al, l42, Isl, 30 153, Ij4, go.
lst Range North, %, 81, 10, 100. III III, 113
~, 133, 134, 1O5, 100, 49, H. 116 lis, ~ 12S
49, $50, 135, l3G, 49,, 138 y, 10, %. d. 81 36
40, 106, 123, 124, rs, 126 ~
I'd Range North, 81 80, 81 40, 151, 152 153
160, 161, 162, Ga, &c. 49, '
POI acres of land lying in the ID Civil District
OF Knox county, and described March |. 1862
rs beginning on spanish oak running thence
north 48 deg. and log min. east 187 poles, thence
west pole to pest oak stump thence south 80
deg. west l69 poles, thence south 10 east IS
poles to stump, thence to the beginning
being a part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North of
James Bells, now ThOs Z Champions proper-
ty, belonging to A Whites estate. and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabry b9
John Williams and J J Craig, executors of
Sam White, March l, 1862, by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knox county, in
Book A. Vol. Sd, page 4OI
10 acres OF land lying in the I'd civil district Of
Knox county and bounded and described as
follows, to wit: Beginning at a stake ON the
Fair Grounds fence, running thence 81 f Il
RGSSs . Wi4 fen "d Fence Fence A 4 poles
fence, thence s % E q poles with said
fence, thence N 96 Z 13I poles to a stake corner
to Ma5ry and Howell, near the branch
thence North % East with Mabry's
line Al poles to stake, Mabry's corner, thence
north s. west fl poles with Mabrv's line. to A
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake,
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry, April %, 1862
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Otice of Knox county, in Book +.
Vol. Sd, page 24j
Lots Nos. 4. and 6, as designated upon the
map OF the Kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court of Knox county in the case Of
h. w. Nanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to Jos. A.
Mabry by ID. a. Deaderck, e. IL NJ, May 7th,
1863 by deed registered in the Registers Office
OF Knox county, in Book Z. Vol. 3, page $40.
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 9Sl acres of land lying in the 10Th civil
district of Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph A Mabry by Jno F Pate, guardian, &C.,
by deed registered in the Registers office of
county Y
and dated May 3, 1888. Said land adjOins the
lands of Elijah Walker, Smith and Others,
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox CO,
in the case of l. NJ Fatio VS. P Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals Of the State of Tennersee, to-wit;
No. 2,267, in the case of Brownlow s. Ross VS.
Lyon d Ramsey, trustees, &C. ct ais
No. 2,266, In same case as next above.
No. 2O65, in case of Odell 81 Mabry VS. Will
kins 81 Freels, administrators.
No. 2OG6, in same case as NEXT above
n. 1913 in case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
VS. Chuschwell & Armstrong.
No ,944 in same case as next above
No. 1905, in case of Mabry & Rule W Tenn
pie Harris.
No. 1904, in some case as next above
No 1874, in case of Jno A Williams VS. A
Mabry ct ais.
No. 1875, in ease of Jno A Williams VS. J 4
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2, go, in case of Jno L Helms ct ais vs. G.
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No 2,269, in case of Jno Helms ct ais VS. e
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
No. 2,Ol4, in case of j y s. G w Mabry vs. G
n Nee.
No, 2,O15, in case of A sc w Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. 2,0l6, in case of J a & G w Mabry vs.
A Nee.
No. L. O5, in case of j y Mabry VS. 7 S Webb,
admir- sc.
No. L. O6, in case of J A Mabry VS. 7 S Webb,
admir- &c.
No. 1,73l, in case of ] A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves
No. 1,730, in case of j \ Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 49,, in case of y Mabry VS. james
Bell
No. 1,738 in case of j A Mabry VS. James
Bell