The Republican journal. [volume] (Belfast, Me.) 1829-current, 1872-05-02
Supreme judicial Court.



piaintni's farm which appears in deed, and
the right to mill privilege in Unity. By agree
ment reported to full Court. Boyle and Me-
Lellan. Jewett.
State ". James sullivan and Charles Brown.
Two Young men from st. Adams who last
winter stole a sleigh robe. and alleged that it
was done to save themselves from starving.
they have lain i'll jail ever since. The Court
sentenced them to ten DAYS more.
Joseph G. Mudgett VS.. the Eastern Granite
Company OF Frankfort. Account annexed for
labor sharpening tools and for cutting stone, in
the spring of 1874, S-92- Defense. Yes, you
did that amount Of WORK for our company. but
not by our employment, nor on our credit. We
never promised 10 pay you but we have paid
Seldom Morton, one Of our company whom you
owed, TO The amount cf this bill and more, and
whom you agreed 10 pay by this very work.
Reply. Well, il | owed him, 1t was for liquor,
and that is no legal debt. True, bad talk with
Morton about working for the Granite Com
pany, but did not conclude TO commence work
for them till Thomas Clark, another namher.
came and hired me for the Company. I DO moi
choose to turn my work in this way. Rejoinder.
Suppose it was for liquor; it is nJt our duty 10
inquire into the merits of your transactions with
Morton. We mean TO keep faith with Morton,
If you do not Besides, Morton denies that he
sold you liquor, He was truckmau and hauled
the liquor for you from the freight house, two
and oue-half miles, advanced the freight, and in
to your store, and become responsible tor its
value TO the owner, and did, and finally paid for
it Id full. Verdict for def. Vo,e Hubbard
Joseph G. Mudget- ". s d0n Mo rton. Ac-
ton to recover back partial payments nude on
| The barrel of liquor III the proceeding case Be
4 ported to full Court. Vose. Hubbard.
Nathaniel Ayeril IS. Pee9 Roony. Ia plea
| of land. To recover thesIie pasture in Frank
/ fort. " iich, IN 1869 WAS the property vi enc
James NJ Atwoou, worth $40. Pin demands
I possession By virtue of attachment dated
| Aug. 16, 1869, perfected by levy OF date OF
| Nov. s, following Defense. Atwood had no
title for YOU 10 attach. He conveyed the Ide lot
to me warantee deed. July % nearly Il
month prior 10 your attachment Reply. Well,
4 What Of ii. Ny attachment Nya~ IN record
August is. and your deed not recorded till
three day, later. Rejointer. True bat when
YOU made the attachment you krew that | had
deed. and il was fraud III YOU 10 try TO sip
Your attachment under my deed. The object OF
recording is 10 give notice md II you had actual
notice that il sufficient tor my purpose. Sure
ioinder. Your law Is good, but not your fact.
When put Oh this attachment l did not know
ahsr real estate Atwood had, nor any thing
about the idt lot. Went for security on any
real property he might have, and have Do
knowledge outside Of the record. Court gave
the law That it is incumbent upon the dett. 10
prove that the PIN. had actual notice of the
dc, from Atwood to him, when he made the
attachment While, III order 10 establish such
notice, il l. not absolutely necessary that The
psnliff should have defendants deed
or that Atwood should have told him the
conveyance, il is necessary that the plf :
information in regard 10 the conveyance
! should be so express and satisfactory 10 the
PHI. that 1t would be fraud upon hlm TO attach
or levy upon the land to the prejudice OF the
def. The posse sion of the premises would
not be actual notice, nor was the pr bound tc
inquire. The evidence from all the circum
satnGes must be such as to satisfy YOU or give
YOU reasonable satisfaction that the pf. had
knowledge Of the existence Of the deed. The
testimony was contradIcttng. The verdict was
for the pff- Hubbard Vose
State ". Robert Morrow The respondent
was indicted Two wears ago for shooting A. I
Peabody with charge Of bird shot. They are
neighbors III Searsport and quarrel arose
about the hens scratching i'll the gardens. Nor
row claimed that the shooting was accidental
Several citizens OF SearsporJ testified 10 Nor
rows good reputation and peaceabie character.
, The Court ordered that de- pay G4ie Vt $40 aud
pc DISCHARGED.
Geo, q. Patterson vs.. Jacob VI. Paul. Ae
count annexed for note given al sl05. For {
Sore biii Of goods mostly delivered TO Johr
Sanborn, In 1863. 1881 .+6; total 1886 46. CT. by
stave stuff hauled by sanborn, 1928 Al; balance
SS705. Defense. Strike of from your ni
% 10, delivered not 70 sanDorn but to h- team
ster, snd 500 80 paid to Myers for hauling, thai
reduces your b tlauce to $40 50, But we 20 for
q whole defense. The staye stuff which you
were 50 very kind as to turn TO our cIedIt, 4
part of it WIS to pay for the Sl0J note signed
by SanhoTn, and which | agreed with sanborn
ID pa but 10 the balance of your bill plead the
At
''A,',e u AUS =" ''i' iii7 '0' 42''i' '0'N
'i'o - 'a"''' - A''u Wv - 'uo" 'n'
"''''V" Pi9"'''0 " ~ r. A-'P''. "e
!Feieu 9A"0 II " %'o's MI "'u''i H'''' 'o'A Ut
"'s'' - '''N "''D''N '0'1 ''e P'''e "'
was occupying, nc also paid mall sums in hi.
presence and by MS verbal order to bis team
sci : Win" vas tue S''ie - "e'''eiF u '''n
cue '''' '"'e' va" ''''S' 90 sing
co. 'Al"' I'M ~" ''@''' -
~
,94'' '''
~
- N "'U''' we iA' :
"l5''eH ~ ''''''"S 1i'''' S''h9'H'"S' A'''
7''U@" 20 i''S '''"l 10 "'S 'i'oi "'' 1t = GU Vi
'e"eoA '" 'Ni'e3l IT'S ~ l"S ;" iaisT "''' lol
/ me NoiI'HeN' 7fHopfu H9h WIG" nave no
/ security sho l pIead the statute 81 fauu7 90
you r iesat ear "'th citRr conscience
9uFFelolhoef 10Y had security iFoi" Ndn""ih'
as oeileFe. 10 not tAlhH Inc slaiuie al ia"G
! AppIiG- 70 ~lcti case as 1 STATE. me charge OF