The Richmond palladium. [volume] (Richmond, Ind.) 1855-1875, 1872-05-11
COUNTY SEAT.

COUNTY SEAT.
7 M. E1lToe = Al artiek appears in yous
papsf of aaA vssk (aad flsarn 4 i in tbs
other city pspsrs,) ossr the signature Of
CIV. Barnes ard oth6s. Feisrrirg 70 this
le1sdtinI question, of the removal Of the
-essnty eat, which, with your permission I
'dsetssa TO eitS / tasiue iotiSs. I J lJA1
In that article Il : -sslsss that grounds
have been procured for the erection Of the
County butliaes IN RisAnond. asd tlAs IL
The change Is made, The county sat no
nosd tom Asntp,villstn kiehnosd, J q
aspsHssd zalel OIL 81 sst.ts snA esunty
eaildinss in Ceqtryil|s I'LL b promptly
paid BY Richabal, asdso ealior tax will be
usdeI % ne Psopas II ths Ooanay outside ef
Richmond for that psrpess. { ag
I Following No find this statement in said
article: We sssurs you, no person sign
ing the petition will iscpr any liability there
in, ~ the law simply makes this the way Of
testing the public wish, instead Of BY vote.
Yos will simply pay the tax that yoa viii
pay If built At Centrevills, except, We think,
BY building here we can save you large
amount OF tax BY reason OF our facilities
fotbuildinE.' Sl,*' 81. - . I,
The facts set forth in said article may be
all 1true enough, indeed from the known
character Of the names II said article. shall
not attempt to controvert them. The signing
Of name to petition for { change, does not
in law bind the party signing to pay any
thing towards the appraised value Of the
county seat property .. Csntrevills, and II
Richmond pays this sum, tho petitioners viii
Of course not be required to pay anything
for that purpose. But there is one feature
to that article that tax payers should not
overlook. The authors say, :" You ,cM .im-
ply pay the tar that you ~Iz poy il bais at
C~trepile." except the saving tnat may pos
sibly be had, BY means Of the better facilities
'or building .t Richmond 81 nond .,.sa..., q
This proposition Is true PROVIDED the Peo-
pie Of the county, or any body else were tc
build Court House. County jail, Clerks
Treasurers, AUDITORS Recorders and Sher =.
id's ohices At Cenirey'lie, but inasmueh as
there Is 5000 JAZZ. JUST comPle'ed' costing
| near eighty thousand dollars, respectable
Court House. sad oil other county oc,la'ngs
good isf s~snsy seess 70 come, Hfesoy
erected and pad for asscentrev'ie' I" strikes
me that the tax payers mus. know snal ~
WIZ cset large s"@ 0. money y
from their pockets 70 ssess. nsse oa"a''ss 10 ,
Richmond. 1Ae movers 70 eo's Pf"poseo
change Know, inA Y tne p'oiecs. sucsseos !,
that money ZOE .ns e.ssaoo ana n's ~ .
.ns "u "a. I - '' '0"1 ..aa. ~ -" =
| af ss"'s1 ''ou, 'ue pe''p'e r'Ness y :.
tases' ana .ney' kno" soo, " can e-s"y LUZ.
~ exam'nne 'ns 'a' 'n.' .'.ak :. -
nave 70 Fay tue casa '1'ue VI '"e 1 J:
properly ~ oen''e'"ie' ye' s.. '".' "
DONE shey can1ot Iemose ol1H " SUM-
OF anything else ss'Acsea - Tue 's-''
II may be seia thas W. sssssy thus OBJ
tainsd for tho eoalty property Aeus1sv"Ae
will be put into the County Treasury, and
By order OF the Codnty Ccm il1lAs ap
1 piled to the use OF sfecsnR ne" OoAd'"e'
as h'comends inn snins Prooso'y 10 coE'
rect but when the Hosesnors co"n'sson
ers come to appraise the GROUNDS ANA ouio
ings Of the county as Centreviiie a. tnel
fair cash yalus, With ~ county seat removes
! think it more than hkeiy tnas the SUN ""
bel very insignIncans amount towsto sa'
ersction Of new sui'dmGs o Aicn n 2 e {
Its said, and only said = IN excuse II
this move OF relocation, snss tho tr'enA
Centreviile mao eommeucso
have new Court mouse erecsed IN Oen =
vine. THIS statsmsns ta'ss' Az .pp''e.
ton had been made 20 sne ooaro o. ooa.s'
Commlse,onefs 70 eass s''nsF ne" ne SsS.,'
county omces 'or sos sase keeping anu P'e'''
Walton Of the rpcosee q sne county, 9. ~
the old ones 20 repaired. me oo"m'.o.
srs refused snd an aPPhcA'ion "ss "a1s
the judge OF the common r'eas oo"r'
compel the Commissioners 70 HaAs 'n' -
sir.d improve ment; nut 20 soon - ~
movers in this saw that NOT only the IF'eno
Of Kiehnonds Dus soe 'l = -
generally were OPT osed TO H''ne proceoln9
were Observation-Disclosures. NOW n'cn
mond will abandon her move ior ie.'ocs
ton, would believe they are s'neeFe
charging that this move for nre PROOF ou'0
ings was the cause otssne move toF 70 LUCE
e.e 49, '. s.a,x,, .o,.,,a.
= -" " ....S,s :. .-,....a ,h.. n
II csDuos Sesson@o'y oe eAP0 s