, 1872-01-31
PROCEEDINGS y
Of the Colonial Council for st. Croix.

orG5art "J hntSFH%rWE a"ann m Wn on m cHn emn mI 1 m 9' 80 nt '
S"%%6sffH s n%f BE- ." here herr s s %% a% % off o% Srl viii % as sS 3xs ' sdTn ou6sn f ee%ss tho S 500 P ss
the Draft gain hst Thomas deserves Deserve oU veght? bt G% G @H mot II % bee dsSea til thatt uM is Gm %n n % mgavo On
f ss Si % 5sv S Ss os f as l Hs a:S G@%si If ' 4n. D sons taiS % aas5 9s 1s %4y 1dass a +? b; cS SSo.
the Draft had 5 her igor H d%sg &t the : nd discussion %D%a ad It would would i%e5 s%5 o @ 1% Ssss%e
had st his all the time but had ss6a9sd from s1ang It: this sdp Discussion here is carried on
ee int the 9q I'VE" D% saf hs til" Sd 1s sg 3s i1 9&3 thou d 5aHn tito inc %i P%n " rh%s so TO 5e a%5 dT Ts
to delay and icopguSy. lie feels tth he %&c h%gape viii amy my neglect in dt% "pef #
complained Of v"5 i%o BEEN s6 felt list still T "%; and this c%6 a% Or % ST Members thereof % aon not
% Mem %% v% %%$ :% a% S % %% The s% st. G o%4 " Member. %s d %" cone united ''''''' and 'sS '1''"''
as %s%5 G% ooa6hn% @S v5 % r % ~5 against 9%o 6o2 4% R@: Inc n'''"s' =" . ""' VOTE '""
n TIE ,S S4ms Kerr explained J that according !" the plan h5bsto followed there vas dshaysd an
H is pop ,%' t %t Sansasf 9t f%. d SH5 . Se6a 5S 1rnsaatev s 95d o % s n certain ps n as fa gsmns Il
o o%% 9 % the the d 6%%oeS %aH Ga sS " 'SS oai5 dss rae ' Sssd6ss % 1 s%5 .s any Hs sassRs do 5 S na s sp
$ $oo p % %% %sb S the % I%5asn G cs pnS@a s o%%6 PsP %s q%f oone@ 9m m rS'@ omss a"o od
sy@t but so certain sums are % s%Td %1 & the ad Inherent rel 9 gPsde, G the csnm% lite T" em mn % " %%t
!. ah c%vnnen5T (Wnrrnors said hth ought entirely ODE hno the officers themselves
sing 9 9s: ' $Ss sSs7: ::si I'd " @a as s' to e a s' 5s%#t IT, 5: s@%t ss he G. r9s only s 6.s s;
man. FrdedhH9d Of all Offering that that Circumstance apPcard explained by the fact Of no
The SPEAKER drew attention to the Officer at KngshHl, who would be considered as epper
toni 45 Mm 5 for rs4naae1. Country District p5eHn4A@ said that he thinks it noma-
it was aad o% u %@@no"S T T2 i4 uos nv 1R Ghnns n% put Td %% sn"0Hs"'N MOI q 0'' vote apo
r T as sGnnamn 33 Placed laced No No 5 WIN amendment mdorl discussion
tent that While %G G% %%o ob T%ed% % v %' %9ob Pg%stp n n@ dH SG@&o of the m "n &5 bo %9% sm.
Sss@s TSs %S" a %S i ' %5 % "% S% %s Po"aS St 5S d s% &s so !" ssod S p'% %9 u %s 9%s
1 1%s ss as a"ss 5 %s h; 1s sss sa ts sf a s" sasss s Sa in % s, an:%%" No Of" ii 8 til. vote and
it vT S adG 9 %5 p %1%Su Mg with e %e~
5 a; S:9%:::::. AZ % $:S Sa : Hs s4 %:;@ %5 mt s :a:s9e " a%: :1 % ii .nssn.! n. ~
though it is pretty we'll explained in the Report ACCORDING to existing regulations an oGeer has
tho %o "s@ his H v@s %; ;3 &e o& 81 os % %aTsn Ss" to amy am 1 ~h%ss iisf S REs% Ts s znsa ss hs4 m aa.y, An IN
t. ~ s%gf nn Raaa that the old 1 ~a9%q was detained but SIM ass las ns%% 5 9no Observed
the pTop Of salary o the oon@ or1 sp md T Se mT doubt %T T thee S% Adnnh RmmS a@ Es" h s NEWT %nO 0r
finance has nandedc could gWet Sot it appears common uSc to wod 1.-THE s as proposed.
The COMMITTEE WOULD hOweverw withdraw amendment No. 8n 6T of H Exenenys
AS no one else desired the word thu Chairman pm the amendment No II to the vUhj it was
adopted unanimously with 10 votes
No IS was withdraw
the Chairman had proposed the amendment No 49, he vacated his seat TO the VcnbaI
MANI Dubois whop the amendment TO- 10 mer dscEhn.
ItM enbrt rt r6Hnted( SARAUW) referred to the MoNeS accompanying this amendment.
He thought that he hdal reason to propose it, buta His xcMecv has to-day Naed that the
alteration ia OfcemtO2 Officers to get Royal appointment will nec@atea fourth reading in
St IhOnHS he wod whhdrwh the nelmntT The other renaMnso ioGonst to the OrimnceeA
member r MP 99@ so%~ds o6oaEt att@ e %dS Of higher Py6 than that tic for he Chief Off
cerh would only say that they are not correctly which can be@ seen by referring to the Budget ts
3dC Ownmemtr (RMPAcD said that lis atemen shd not been AIKEN from the budget
ff nm n@ o fd mott 5 S s v%s h so~ %h mSj j1 ser r e9 Td5 ts s s9 the ia 1# 6s%f sj !" h% oS
SsS s :, H. s sssssa @ 81 4n s Sss s 4 81 @ S9 sss 81: ss ss 'n + 1sssnn s 'y thing included
qyng the proposal from the I%5 {HG o%r naG ad Wherein Wherein he ' Expresses hi his " op%n i aS Ps
Military mghtbe dispensed with Ihe Chairman is mott goy one holding that.
2dM Member for Fwdehksed (FABEDsadh he thought he had right to ommm on the pro
poaj whcb had eens to teM Members evaald asp previously, even fifth Withdrawn.
A sOt discussion then eu@ed between the 2ndM Member for Chrstanded Country District
(RoseEtand)a nd4 Member rF redeiktedsC Country District CMcWHHaml the Governor LIST
and End Members rF pdeiksed( Saauw and FabNO, in concluding which the End Member for