The Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865-1903, 1872-05-03
Qvat YAM 8NNaoM YAdIa4 YI1Ad ON 11Ear,

From this committed every person thlring our
Views concerning he nomination Of Mr.. Greeley
was studlously excluded, although In the First
Judicial Dietfiet alone We nominated twenty
alRte numbering but e.. Bat We further stats
that In the first congressional diatriet Edwin Il.
HeAmon was nominated in the delegation present
from that district a. one Of tho representative
delegates, and after II was Asc6ttAined that MI
9eanou was opposed 10 the nomination o. MT.
Greeley, another perSon, known % Rocky Moore,
was substituted for him BY the committee. We
further state that the delegates present nom the
Sth congressional district met a. directed ~ tho
chAlr and nominated by vote OF 8 out OF u
dsl'gstes then md sare gEsssEs yss sshoP
and that this choice was duty reported and dts
regarded by said eommittee and by the whole
number Of menb II In its election; that the rep
resmtAttyo delegates reported By tho commit:
teo elected BY tho whole body 'trom Sthie
district were never nominated OF any meet
Ing l,by9 any resident delegates thereof -
required BY the Instructions Of the CohVention
and BY the resolutions Of our Inembers. We
fnrther state that In tho 9Th Congressional dis
utct, the ono delegate present, recommended
aI,n himself Snd Thee bacon e. RspIesi GEE
was opposed TO the nomination Of Mr.. Greeley,
the eomnilttee I'D with ont eonanltatton
with any resident ot the nth CongtOBSioIal dis:
tfiet thenAme Of the person known 10 concur In
theVtews OF . majority. We further state that
no PERSONS were present as members ofthe Con
and then In the election oEthe Republican dole
gAt0s 70 oil iheaA vacancies, all peraons under.
stood TO be opposed 70 the nomination Of NJ.
Greeley, were 6tudiously ignored We further
state that at Affneettng Of tho whole body OF
members, motion was put and carried, In
strneting thu entire Republican delegation 70
cast thelr' vote 9nlid for Greeley Until twenty
delegates requested that they should retire for
CONSULTATION and eYen atter that tho vote q the
whole state was to be cast as the majority
Bhould direct, dlAregnrdinS entirely tho prefer.
ence Of particular districts, and that We protest
against the vote OF the Stats Of New York being
received In that manner. WO further submit
th4t the Republican delegation, as ut present
Gonsalqtod, does not represent tho mass OF the
Delegation Of tho ktate.Flif "a "a tSIRned;ls s-Ss
John Norton lPpmeIoy. End II WiSaol. 4
Theodore Brown. aS 4s0,yG! Brogd0n. ts4Ssi
David Dudley Field George W. DilhWAy,
Edward Il. 6samon. Leroy o. Love.
Mahlon Sands. Alfred Taylor.
HehryD Lloyd. eae RdVardI Eennell. ava
James l. Bishop. 10 W.H.AIruwsmith.
M.J. Hardy. James Dome.
George Mclean. James X. Adams.
Wm. Dudley Foulke. De witt stafford.
EnomA9 Dutiy. SChArles ], JoWett. q
Gsass HaasIs9 AsKstsl Il F' fOfs 4 6.A e
The Chairman-Thefe are three com.
mittees that arc now to be filled by one
delegateto disappointed from each State
on Permanent Organization and q Com.
mtttee on Resolutions and Platform.
ADelegate-BefoFe the roll ID, Called
suggest that the Committee on Creden.l
tials be requested to prepare their report
for action. '''@
The Committee on Credentials were
then requested to retire. 90 crAigs
Col Nichols called the roll Of the States
and territories on which the names Of the
committeeman were reported, So n