, 1872-06-19

snd9 tas% S1 mo oa%oo Of 1867 Was o%ny meant to be- temporary % aGn' n appa "5 2@Si thu @ 6 %aR f5@;
S$% s s% % I'D % %s5s G sS s s ssSs ii 4 5s%% r f.: sS e Fl. tea @5 .S T VI ~ :3: % N ,as .as H "%:
mIEa % as as Judge and ooIS and a% "s% o6ngo% %S y @v Or p @@ pn n any nG dre %%%G nit
H HSa0 s Aelh sPa asa b" o 5s s9 % @s P %o "a sss2H SoSd G % 'o 1as ' t" P9 a5 aS the 9T To2s
s %%; %" @%% s% .: :: " n % IS Sa 9%S. $ % e a$ %$s ' 5% %5 + J J%% s % s 5%@ @ q p $sS a t. ss . %Gs
ols a nsaas s"d Ba5 b'% oS& si ii" o G% ' d.S1od i5G H%S i" S%%dy '9 ns%a yu % e%%o SHOULD Gp ba 3
The S~1sn"n~ pmd to the Report; nothing is stated oho details in the proposal before
back SGs @a be %%n %%i %o % @s two T% oao$ % " s ways S %s sP" % J." % HISS i$s 5s'y rSn %y
Tn%is s ohss an H'N '".'''y "a" appointed !" one" "'' ' ''n''''' offices" himself S"""'
rm THE t Eo g%%ro. % %4 did am not % i%% %I @o M% %o2 t. H 60 into a@ 3% "h1 but tn" he would ask the
detail given Of The @% for he must repeat it's Goys%1%cs Business to BRING in in "a draft with ali
% %a %@P5% IF G revert ns T n% %' t Ra a% % %IJ 5& @. % S1 4 Go n % 1%%@ 5 ' S oaS ec % n 5%eS ~ %l Py ao
l4 Member % for 5 5s;s N@@ said he feared that an arrangement with roHounn~
The Vngomm@ said hatm it is am9o pmppes ogh to be established, by oMudo de-
s could discussed At Al; and when only the cq%ou does not onm 5%' iPofoo1 @S%Yo
had no 4 Tn9 b%tE &Pr m @ aG%s0 Com mq " Dhtd h E& 1t 1 1%E@5T r db mH cG "o% cr,on how frth.
com1onn0 on TIC qDsdon brought IN Gy the c"n@4"s.s na 5H @ ad 0 IF fe Council Gom"rHi
a a5 to &c Sns@ 9"me mot " the mg soP on a G%a aag @ Jo the ne on !m %w TMo to- n%n.
menior4in tn. Remarks to the B?dsesao not to uotot the two offices again, due notice will be
FIN, Council consider the maosra @no consequence as to need addressing r1 the Government tom on IT,
know. @ @ ~ ~@s "nH the G Mo@so8o % %o"g go D if" is %"P paao2plo " sagh %o o S% e4ab%%.3leI
and the debates consequently confined %@ pdMnd91 Membon's aamh5n@ rejection Of that
amendment or besides we re to deal with the d@ais oay special plan Without P"pmmd
all purpose and as it was growing late in the afternoon he thought it was necessary to come to
s sl H H.@s. for for; S Ssa5"sa:5 :5 5sSsy 9 Bsa: s' }s~% @s ssp: n i'd G@h %a s% :Ra1o Wording
% ion "S on %%y by Government could Scarcely @n% We been 6@doy %l %" After % %s a %%%@
o executive TIN " 5 %G@P @S concerned from the Judicial ip@ in p"%@e@""aa o ssan ddP passing g Sentences s % @ @G
only certain pubic cases tno"b belong nn5"h the Police Court viii be coming before tho Judge
no. E% ter w@ won G be au da@us %" .w " any i%so ~bne oG ralh % ait "I %. byn dos dm1t tSn ooG. n 55" cause.
p m9 ne4 9 to %%@b"o to %~" @y 5@&asoI !%s bP @%@ oo o 9@23o "% d .% do two % f fpo
uOn5 lift could bo shown That ms oSmShpnW vas wrong and the other right surely no one
would hesitate to say tkeh right one. Butt there is mother practical view to be tkM, that
namely thee old organisations GSe expensive; 1t is only by laying all the Poicfucdons-he G-
eMVe fnchom5D would be-uahrm one PoAcemado, that the Majority has arrived at the cOdu
sion that the measure they advocate would moth as expensive as the present organisation And
this fact will ut the Same time SmW the 3d Member for tUedGIe1s C0unY District
[McWnGaml that We cannot WE'LL look at the proposal the Committee, without at the same time
looking to practical way op plan sintndedD be crned out as this point must to- very ma
tal extent affect the vote of tn Members, since We n arrive at no correct opinion on the pro-
pa. ues We examine hn reasons given, and yd do just involve the advEabenes3 or madvEa
beneB Of PoHcemaAer- III efemg the separation of the fncins there may be many
ways to attain the oJecj there are Iastm more ways han one Wei may have 3 Judges an3
PoHcenadoY ? Judges and oHenNte 2 Judges and l PLnmasr; these plans will be
NOR" or less expensive; bhhY true the Majority j" of the opinion that the financial question is
MOTT chief Wom hsc ease so hth he Majority would have no obEcomo mee Expense Hony
tep principle be eabihedS they mtt To hn, the Speaker an arrangement with Police
master with salary off l. $1,000 P a aud 9 Judgsa $4,000 besides Police Assistants eg
sonewhatm erespmSdet thar. nW audw with Sl20m more in sMy to ehl would be costing $500,
consequently not more than the presents system; so hen hose in four of the principle wMd pre-
fer ump plan, even as the Majority Gems do, Butt the proposal would anwo of 4h ogniadon,
which strikes him. to be very natural and cheaper sHH namely l PocmMtr With $1,000 D. a.
Judge with $4,000; and we are bh ave1P oimnbn,w why n&j just as we'll have l judge; at
alevnts he could eOg eero objections to that There is only tss serious drawback, namely
thtn tdw way there ohdW y be 2Law ohcs5a and in cseo fscknes or absence it would
times be mpNlbet get the business done. Sot then, the natter stands; which of the pansE
BEST there opinions may differ; adi fit could be avoided having mp proposal me the shet ola
vote he would rer see that, for with eAd to The several pns there is so much to be said for
and gnst hmh that it is only when the whole scheme whichever one Government should adopt
mmsLaEm the mlN Lw cmdh nnnamdh MnSLL m nMuw Ma aua for aanL-