, 1872-11-07

any pork trade, and never aufhoslzeu ans I tt
IL ~ y ro me- but have told each Of them not to
nav q dollar on the account without nay consent.
fknor yesterday eay thas tIsasa We A4 had $500
% sccnrities. say the never, to my knewedge had
anything to Do Win tue r n nnf any pep
Nv tf,at there never any time when would give
him 81 500 for his interest IN the property re assun
ing the thereon and cSnor Il the house As
the property to be, it is Sc feet front on
warren avenue by 125 feet deep On Robey street Qn
the southwest corner), with twostory frame house
on it. But there only trust deed on it for this
amount, would consider 1t in much better shape
security than to hold the fourth trust deed on it, and
not shape to protect the Others in the interest
was not paid promptly they decare forfeiture and
advertise the property for SALE Ny that
become due. During the GUNNER, some time, Ticknor
called me and said he needed some money, and il
could n9t it. hS could get It from
better than any one else; take your papors and 60
and get it and pay ne s275 being for note Of $50
took the papers, and afterwards reported to that
Follsnsbe gave him s5oo,-not particularly on the
securities, but knowing that be would pay it. And
been SOS, but I think it was s275. wroto
Tieknor %, on 18th September, asking him to to
vs aece ibis and eF cav. to the sr q
Geb and asked him to personally deliver 1t to Tick
nor; and his reply to me was that Tcknor refused.
It ali times @ ready to submit tis matter to any three
disinterested men to decide and that was willing to
do go without reference to tho decision against the
firm BY you believe 11r. Ticknor owes me, and
would like the matter settled up. Ticknor called on
me after the in wheat burst, and wanted the
continuation Of abstract as he said to borrow money
again tried to get it, but failed. And III Ticknors
evidence he claims that it my abstract nave
es can given full statement OF the facts n ens
case.
AFFIDAVIT OF ISAAC MFER.
lfr. Isaac Myer swore as follows:
Ticknor says the firm refused to arbitrate. admit
Tcknor did ask me to arbitrate this clam. salo
must first see Baxter, he controlled the account,
and # he wished WIS very willing. Ticknor says
both firms called on him for margins never asked
him for any money but when Bastep sau ~ nu XII
if Ticknor didn't put it up, he would Iicknor says
nc always treated the account as his This aeny.
not, under any circumstances, have made half '
SO many trades had considered -dda lne
account Tcknors. TcEnor Drought tne oTaer' so, w.,
to me, signed Baxter, and sent W Taylor to the
Office fer the check and he brought tho check back
md gave it to Ticlnor. Ticknor says We nave pao
money without Baxer's consent. This deny posi-.
tyely. never paid him dollar on this account
without first getting Da1ter's permission, and would
not have done SO under 2 any "a W Mn;n m
settlement Of about 5000 due us By him. which would
gladly have accented could have seen the amount due
sesoa s init hnsRf 80 oa Ra 5a -
dollar il our hands that he icknor} could control
end when 1etnSr n afsd toa b 13 paS
could not do SO without Da1ters CONSENT md did not
do SO until Baxter hsd gwen ,r11 .ha
say tha so'n nue r. and also ince
i Ts a be sTer Baxer Co. hut The account
lent in his name was not biz, and that he tTcknor)
didn't control it, and for to that be had
my money may here state that when saw ba1tes M
and asked Il he wished to aroitrate tns accoans ne
replied that WIS awys wng h ANU h an o i but IN
Ills cs s aIr Ticiuor lad IS ye. nude no complaint
nor called for settlement be Baxter] having been IN
New York all the previous ten days.
,7p cuAR1rs q. cU1yEB.
m hab,1f ~ t1,o Roard of Direc-
toru ~ sen1a IN e,,nnort n evnnlsion. Te
rofa,-a3 rofa, s}''A 70 tbe tnrinted statement Of
Taonsrd Swat settind forth +he points of the
49, ~, haha1f ~ tRa Defendants. and the
es7o nanar1a+ ss11ed hv +a dcfendnnts purportinc
panta;n s11 t,a svidanca He contgaded that
ne;ther docnment contained all the evidence,
Io as,1 1ha nsmnhIet ten7ed to create the impress
eu e;nn 1 4'of Xxx D;rcctors were not disposed to
tron+ % 4ha defandants fairly. The dispute be-
taa,, Ne Rs1tar T. - ,oso ont af losses
s"esn u 81, tro3es .r;th I Iyon T. (,o.. "
sus1a Tan'n1eton ~ ,AN'> and Mr.. McWhinneY. who
fe;1a3 at tha lime nf tl,e wheat corner in August
last The conviction of the Board Of Directors
tss INIT to re}iaye themselves as much as pos
e;aIa +ro1n 1nss hv these narties. to whom they
- - - a. %;,,o N{xar Ra~ter T. Co