, 1872-11-07

YESTERDAYS BUSINESS.
OTTAWA. Nov. G.-The Supreme Court met at 10
O'Clock, pursuant to adjournment there being fa
appeals, motions, &C., disposed OF
PEOPLES DOCKET.
11-Gregory Peri Y. The People. Judge Walker
delivered The opinion Of the Court He said that
case the Judgment is affirmed by majority Of the
Court and the opinion Of the Court is filed; and also
the dissenting opinion OF one MEMBER o. ne o9af.,
order Of the Court for carrying the sentence OF she
Court below into effect" =.
the majority Of the Court in that case.
Judge Scott do not concur with the majority OF
the Court, md have filed an opinion IN the case.
Judge Lavrence-I do not concur in the opinion Of
the majority Of the Court in the caae-
19-udge Thornton said: ttThis is petition to strike
thu name of attorney from the rolls: motion has
been made continue the case and the continuance
is allowed until next term Of thiscourt;
don said "The Judgment IN This caseis reversed,
and new trial ordered on opinion fled"
IN that case tue judgment Of ths Court below is
versed, aud the defendant given new trial"
CIVIL DocKEr.
85-A1otion for continuance allowed
552-Judgo Thornton said: "Thia is o motion for
leave to flo additional record. Without deciding at
erca OF not the Court win allow 1t to be fled and de-
termne on the hearing what effect is to be given to N
392 Motion to place cause on hearing docket Tor
4ss-Gibbons r Bressler Petition for rehearing de-
| MED.
485--Adlard '. Ad1ard. Judge Lawrence said: The
arga this case orally rehearing were allowed. At
tlis late date the cannot allow the nppllca-
ton. THO case viii be taken nov BY the Court, and
| meet at Springfield, to file BRIEFS"
469-Martin " Judd: Petition for rehearng denied,
nnd opinion dlo to be modified.
47o-Wilson v. Sawyer, ct al. A motion to place
cause on hearing docket for this term denied.
ST. 572 573 Of the Of 18i1-Judge Breese eaid:
ave have had the three cases under consideration
giuce the last ter and have not been able to arrive
prssented IN ths record Which docs not seem to have
been argued by the COUNSEL and which We think ought
to be consdered that is, does the act Of 1857 repeal
by necessary Implication, the act Of l84o, and Is the
first name named on any such revision Of the same
subject as to make it q substitute for the
! be submitted at Springfield in January next. If
understood that way, sny other cases are depending
these cases. and it is important that the questions
Hanger '. City of Chicago. Judge Lawrence said !:
"Ihis case is not now on the DOCKET g An
Court at Springfield and an order sent to enter for
rehearng. The case came upon the docket last term
private docket for decision No arguments
have been fled snce the petition for hear ;;r.
do not Ind tha for
has ever been really entered. The order WILL there
be entered .qne PRO tn as Of tho l Last term
both sides will have leave to file arguments by 1st
Justice Lawrence and Justices Thornton and Nc
Aster filed opinions in favor Of the Issue of attach
| ment against Charles L. Wilson and Andrew Shuman,
the proprietor and the managing editor Of the Chicago
Ers,ing Journal returnable forthwith and the Sheriff
WILL doubt leave here at to serve it, Justice
Walker concured in the opinion Of the Chief Justice
Justice Breese, though dissenting, filed no opinion
Certificates attorneys awarded II. Perkins and
| N. Hayes.
| NEW MOTIONS.
31-N1otion to extend tine for fling briefs to two
days.
62-s1otion for a rule on the Clerk, and for eer-
| fiorari.
105-Notion to set aside continuance a6idavits
| filed.
o9s-Pesmission given to file briefs instauter.
Mr.. Freeman moved that NIr. E. Brown, from q
foreign State, be admitted to practice.
The Court then adjourned until 10 m. tomorr OF.