Arizona citizen., 1872-03-09
March 9, 1872.
FINANCIAL FACTS.


 For the benefit of the public ant
 the information of those who paid tn
 cash, the following statements ar
 made.
 In October, 1869, there was paic
 into said District Court in the case
 of the United States vs. Mccartney
 $500; at the same time, in case by the
 same plaintiff against Apalataque,
 $250; in December, 1870, in a case
 by same plaintiff against w. B. He'll
 ings and Company for Brother), $500;
 in March, 1871, in cause entitled as the last named, $2,OOO; making in all up to that month, $2,S5O collected by the Reavis Court-wheUher legally or not, Is immaterial in this article.
 What became of that cash is a sub ject of much interest to the receivers as we'll as Government, and here is what has been officially ascertained from Dorrington's own showing:
 In October, 1869, $50 was paid to the informer in the Mccartney case in December, 1870, $15O was paid to the informer in the first Hellings' case in September 1871, $500 was paid to the informer in the second Hellings' case; in 1869, October, $4OO was paid to U. $. District Attorney Rowell, and in September 1871, $52S more were paid to the same disgraced official and by thew light" received on the disbursements of Uncle Sam's cash, in the course of an examination made in November or late in 1871, by u Deputy Supervisor of Internal Rev. enue, Reavis made an order of Court on December P, 1871, that $500 more should be paid to the Informer in the second Hellings' case; making a total of disbursements $2, ,22S. Of this sum of credits, the amount of 1928 paid to Rowell, the higher revenue officers declare was so paid illegally, and that Darlington is responsible for it and must pay it to the United States will ingly within 8 reasonable time, or forcibly otherwise.
 The public is reminded of these points: Reavis got into his Court $2, $50 of fines and forfeitures-one half of which belonged to informers and the other half to the United States. In March, 1871, 5000 was paid ill, and none of it was paid out till the following September 15, when $500 went to the informer and $52S to Powell. After an official stirring up in November. $500 more was paid to he informer. December 2S-at least he books and papers so show. Opt February, but $500 had ever been paid to Government, though 1928 had been unlawfully paid to Rowell. At /, very late dates, the clerk for Reavis' i Court, owed Uncle Sam $1,O5O, and t ,rders were out for its collection. The t tatement by Powell that he paid . he $92S for Court expenses, is as I thin " as Reavis' resignation yarn. t The public should bear in mind that t Lr. Hellings states under oath, as L 'ublished in THE CITIZEN of January 0, that as compensation for h1s pay lent of $1,5OO for nolle prosequi in G he Rowell and Reavis' Court, that he ls 7ould be reim bursed when little time . hould elapse "for the thing to settle r, own" by aid of "proper motions" s1 l said Court, out of the $2,OOO for I cited, but which then belonged to the Tnited States and the informer. 1( [ere is pertinent extract from MT. i, i, [ellings' affidavit:
 l then saw the third party, who had me- fl lated between us, and offered to pay the v, l 300, providing they would take it out F [ the S2, 900 forfeited recognizance, Mr. O owell promising all the time that should h returned. In reply to my last proposi- ce on, MT. ROwell said for several reasons n,