Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-09-06

set in the ground in field, thence south an a.,
a poles. crossing the center of sink in a Al
70 post oak, thence south 50 east 96 polos az
the oeginnIng, containing one hundred Scr -
on the 9th day Of March, 1867, by de"rossoid
the Chencery Court of Knox county. and III VI
A Mabry became the purchaser: sale co-,soOs'
ed at the April term Of the Chaneery Con..
A certain tractor parcel of land. in tbo
I IL Of Knox, Second Civil District boundeeJ9 un-
follows: beginning at q small post oaI- ~ as
with s. HowelPs line, thence with HoweTScS tHer
north ~ deg. and 30min. west 81 poles ine
the spring branch to double black oak tboIIng
north q deg and 80 min. east Al poIe,a 'n ~
SINH walnut thence north 20 west "a poles -
small post oak, thence north As east 20 noloo ga
stake, thence north 46 east % poles 20 n staIo
thence south 80 east 81 poles to stake and nom
tiers, thence with the line OF Mrs Morgan and
Howell to the beginning, containing one hun
dred acres more or less; being the same frac,
conveyed to Joseph a. Mabry by Anna or
vannes, and registered in Book f. Vol. 3 na"o
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox county. %
A certain tract of land situated in the Copnt.
of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded ~
follows: beginning at stake pole east of tbs
head of spring, in the gap of ridge and cor.
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south IN
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sappling
thence south u west e poles to post oae
thence north so west 196 poles to hickory
bush, thence north so east Sc poles to q bIac{
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles to a blocI
oak, thence north 81 east 104 poles TO hickorv
thence south IS poles to a small hickory. thenSoo
east 6O poles to a post oak thence south s. east
| 1S8 poles to q stake, thence south 20 west Il
poles to walnut stump, thence south Al east o.
poles to the beginning, containg two hundred
acres more or less, being the same tract convex
ed to joseph seI5 A Mabry; on the 4th day Of Sep.
tered in Book A, Vol. 3, page $50.
The following lots in Nelson Swan & Mabrv,s
addition to Knoxville, to-wit: Nos. - y, %
So Sc, 81, 90 81, 62, 81, So 70, So, IO4 los. 106
being. sixteen Lots; also Lot in Kennedy's
addition to Knoxville, and tifty-six lots in Ma
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville from No
1 to sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson. Swan s. Ma
brys addition to Knoxville, to-wit;
1st Range South, Nos. So 81, 107, 10, 127.
IL, lib, ia, 123, 124 125, 1876 II, % %, 28 90
10, 10, III, ~
ID Range South, 43, 81, 63, Ga, los. 15S 15o
| 156, al, 142, 151, l52, 153. 154, 60.
LIST Range North %, 81, ITO, 100, III, Ill, 113.
10 $50, I35, 136, 137, 1873, p, 10, %, p, So S
| 40, JOG, 123, 124, lbs, 126
I'd Range North, 81, SO, 81 40. Isl, 152, 15s.
l54 155, loo, 157. 15S, 1885, AZ, 49, 10, $50 l59
/ 100, 16l, 162, 81, GO, IS.
| 20f acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
i of Knox county, and described March l. 1862
as beginning on a spanish oak, running thence
north 48 deg and l5l min east 1S7 poles thence
west pole to a post oak stump, thence south So
deg. west I09 poles, thence south 10 east 50
poles to a stump, thence to the beginning
being part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North Of
James Bells, now ThOs Z Champions proper
ty, belonging to Whites estate, and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph a Mabry bY
John Williams and j Craig, executors Of
Sam A White, March /, 1867, by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knox county. in
Book A. Vol. Sd, page 4O1.
10 acres of land lying in the 2deivil district of
Knox county and bounded and described as
follows, to wit: Beginning ut a stake on the
Fair Grounds fence, running thence 81 Z Il
poles with said fence, thence S AZ + Ii poles
with said fence, thence S 40 Z poles with said
fence, thence s Is E q poles with said
fence, thence N 96 f 131 poles to stake corner
to Mabry and Howell, near the branch
thence North % East with Mabry's
line Al poles to stake, Mabrys corner thence
north 50 west Al poles with Mabry's line, to q
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake,
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry, April %, 1862,
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office OF Knox county, in Book L.
Vol. Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4, 5 and 6, as designated upon the
map of the Kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court of Knox county, in the case of
L. w. Vanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to JOS A.
Mabry by ID. A. Deaderick C.. q NJ, May 7th
1868, by deed registered in the Registers Office
of Knox county, in Book E. Vol. 8, page $40
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
, property of Joseph A Mabry.
About 98l acres of land lying in the 10th civil
district OF Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
Joseph A Mabry by Jno + Pate, guardian, &C.,
by deed registered in the Registers Office Of
Knox county, in Book Y, Volume 2, page 2i5,
and dated May 8, 1853. Said land adjOins the
lands of Archie Walker, : Smith anG Others
ana Levied on as the property of Geo. W Ma
Dry:
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
IN the case of l. NJ Fatio vs. p Fatio ct ais, and
the following fromthe Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee to-wit:
Il No. 2 267, in the case of Brownlow & Ross Ys
Lyon q Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
No. ZZ66, IN same case as next aboYe.
No. 2O65, in case of Odell g. Mabfy VS. Viii
kiDs 81 Freels, administrators.
No. 1855 in same case as NEXT above.
N. l,943 IN case of Joseph A Mabry and vile
VS. Chuschwell s. Armstrong
No. 1,944, in same case as next above
ii No. 1,SO5, in case of Mabry s. Rule vs. Tenn
! pie Harris.
No. ,S04, in some case as next above
No. 81, in case of Jno A Williams VS. J a
Mabry ct ais.
No. lSl5 IN case of JnO y Williams VS. j a
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2,270 in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais vs. 6
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No. 2, 269, in case of Jno Helms ct ais vs. g
n MyRatt admir-, ct ais
No. 2014, in case Of j A & G w Mabry VS. G
A Nee.
No. 2,Ol5 in case of A s. G w Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. 2,0l6, in case of A & g w Mabry vs. G
A Nee.
No. los, in case of ] A Mabry VS. T S Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. !, 7O6, in case of A Mabry VS. T S Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. 1871, in case of A Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves
No. 1,7SO, in ease of j A Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,787. in case of A Mabry vs. james
Bell
No. 1,7Ss, in case of A Mabry VS. james
Bell
No. 1877, in case of j A Mabry VS. COwan,
| Mp(1uuo g n