New-York tribune., 1872-07-04
THE REFORM CAMPAIGN.
Continusd from First Page.

i, ,xcept Boone In each OF these districts the Demo
crtic m ejorty would large without Liberal aid' and
With a viii be counted by thousands 1he Wb Dstnct
obroong ire sparsely settled counties between Rola
and the Arons line, with IA much OF the Ola lln as
I u,sJe Of ST. outs County, is strange one In shape
hnt nerhops IA nenty devised for access as was
s.,,Io a,d "a nroba oily Democratic. There Is, how
vor n strone Liberal Republican vote In JEFFERSON
FRANKLIN Gasconade otasY, Crawford Phelps anu
Iaelede and should that vote Se whOiy "itDuIa"h W
the nomination OF Objectionable Democrauo canuE
date the district might be doubtful WIN asalsao'oJ
nominee it will give large majority Inc anu Vo'n
posed of the old With except the cCunleS OF hnh'
Howard and Randolph, Is very compact bock IN 'ho
corner OF the State also in mucn he saino
condition "a the Vtb.
somewhat more doubtful arc the With and IXth D+
tricts The Win, reaching westward from the o'ae
capital along the line Of the Pacific kalroao'
including Johnson County, and southward as far
"a Dallas. embraces counties in which the Liberal
vote in 1870 very heavy For example; Ia Jo1h0n,
the Republican vote in 1870 was 5lo les MAN was sS az % o
McCurg in 1868; 10 Cole 2Sl ess IN hOigan ~ lss
and in the counties composing that di1ttiot @
received GST votes less than he received IN te sae
counties two years before Yet the majority for brown
In these counties was only 1,71 The Liberal RepnDn-
cans have clearly the balance power, and Mr. Bur
dett the present member. - popular ana aSt'e ~
IL is probable that very excellent nomlndlo on u , %
part OF the Liberals and Democrats VIII De beeue "
feat him. The Ixth District embracing -, J0sSpn;
Clinton and other counties in the n9rth-%es1 eOigr ~
the State, also had very heaNy Lo.al , ~ HCinr1
vote. In Buchanan County alone the vote i9r MTO'ns
T99 less in 1870 than in 1861 IN AnuicN "a,
ehsOn PAP; In Holt 23S and lin the district bio Whc
majority for Brown only l,53O That ths lDodis an a
Democrats, If united upon popular canolddIe Ca @
This district PLAIN; but they hardy carry ~
ont such call out their ful strehsln
The two remaining districts, the With and Xth gave
maorites against Brown in 1870 In the Nln enDIsc-
ug the southwestern counties, the vote was BIOWn'
6gie. McClurg Ssh There has, however, been con
sideIabe enfranchsement as well as large lmnlgId-
on i'm this district; and, while IL s probable tnat no
Democrat can be elected strong and popular LiDcII
such As perhaps Col. Gilmore OF SprlDghed, WOuiu
probably succeed in carrying it, In the Ath DslitGi,
tho central counties nCrth OF Tue ilFcI wv
vote I'm 1870 was, Brown S637, Tor MCCIuIR y3Jp
And here also enfranchsement and lmlDlgIatlOn nave
both been considerable IL probable tbdt no DeIOcrat
could carry the district but Col Asper, VINO formerly
represented nearly all the counties now composing ~
and who Is well known throughout that section as
IAbera leader, would probably succeed. A.,
The two remaining districts-tbe Ist emDrdclhg the
lower and the IId the upper portions OF 81 Gq5 CiV
and County-are both strongly German Inc llld now
ever includes a heavy Democratic vote IN the Nlnth
and Tenth Wards and would probably be earned by L
eTal Democrat like Senator BrOCkmcyer, or LlDeral
Rcnubican like Henry OversOlz. The Ist District has
probably twO-thi,ds all It's voters Of German nauYty
ana a large proportion Of them are Liberals IN TN,
district reside Senator Schurz Mr. PrEt0rous senator
GotscLak and other strong German Liberals ana IL B
presumed that the Germans may desire the nOnllhatlOh
of Mr.. Gottschak. Mr. Fnkelnburg, the present mem
ber declines be a candidate for reelection. IN tho
IId District Mr. Wells the present member, VIII uh
doubtedy chosen. In OF the others has tncre
been sufficient discussion since the appOiilonlnebI 10
enable one judge in regard TO the strength OF cah
dates for nomination.