The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-01-16

ps~ servant The Court ruled that the testimony
pxpuTv MARSHAL FREY ON TIE srAsp
pepn Marshal Frey was next called TOR the purpose Of
non with her 4 was ~ reference 70 General ketchsrn
oii,op. WV
a. tS. point Direction by defence to the
Ss a,a The foundation for contradiction OF Jacobs
rum conversation than an counsel on
Susan ON ase aaeon which were
'n ~ remembered
NAV % saa she toS nm IN The presence of arsba Greg
this point svsien ut thai p"boay could r"mem
what Questions were asked Susan JACOBS
Swsen Counsel and ncessan interruptions Court
the ea. Dc placed upon the stand
~. which the lawyers had involved vesbough
Gay 70 say with the meat tedious accuracy baing
State entered no 20 via % defence
20 postpone the examination OF Marshal call
DIR. AIKEN AGAIN ON THE STAND
h,s nonHero was tnen called and IN lev moments
moving through the vast assemblage which
s Ssa the ratings me Professor ana not bring
despatched for the vehicle which contained them,
az the Professor probably found II as much as he
could do TO prOpel the three hundred pounds or so
winch represented all the chemical science OF the
University Of MARYLAND. and winch mas for several
years served TO batle the best lad plans OF coun-
sci and utterly obiushcate the most intelligent OF
s msnaa and nIsg The Professor
court room. and II was large one The greatest
an ety was manifested to hear the iesti inony OF
this well abused witness, ana all eyes were directed
towards him as ne took MS seat in Inc witness box.
SAID he heard In part and read the testimony Of Pro-
combined Choral and ses:m"m and had rsu The espea
ment which Professor McCulioch exhibited In the court
Ss s.. y tina, thus
Of ihs state 70 Sypeth.ss eIc.p
suit AIKEN n% said he had obtained 70 ,hs in
the defence wa. IN reply 70 the Of A.en AND
re6nttal.
Mr. Rsvel and Mr. syes'er replied, and Mr. Thomas con
The state Of claimed tina, the experiment made by
Mccnlloch new matter TO which they had right 10
.p ,eas
msn,s were either fraud or else he displayed the grOssest
the the Defence
any saowsass gentleman stacked. were sreaay
IA ss s;S
sasc.naIy reseivns fancy
and indl;ssiy s.: stomach f9s ihs sxsy
aSas. Of Anu empirical
ns
he The Of tnowns that e
alone and would not be seconded by anybody In hsad
! After the discussion, which was most ably con-
Quoted me Court consulted and finally decided that
O'Clock, the Court adjourned until tomorrow morn
| ing at ten O'Clock.
II would be no stretch OF the truth TO assert that
the events OF the past two days. as connected with
this trial, have developed some strange and unex-
aHpled theories In reference the admissibity OF
evidence. Of the spirit that has characterized the
aclOns or certain members OF the Court during the
entire trial 1 shall consider at length
another time, and VIII merely drop the
remark here that while l have been prepared
for evidences OF craftsmanship all along, l did not
expect 10 note such peculiar administration OF
the rules OF evidence as has been promulgated
during the past two days. 1t appears that the
prosecution are TO be allowed to present their
anew, with restrictions, and defence
allowed no opportunity Of replying. The assertion
Is ventured that the rulings OF this Court upon this
question OF the admlssbllity OF evidence Is en-
tlrely new to the criminal Jurisprudence Of this
any other country. predicted Saturday night that
the case would close this week. but II may Judge
from the evidence presented tonight II VIII be pro-
lOnged for ct least another week alter this.