Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1872-03-18
sunrema CouFt
The following closes the docket Of this
court for the April term:

- N-S ~fAA AgA1A
SECOND CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY
I-Herzog & Bros. vs. John League. clerk. etc
2-IOhn Loague, clerk, etc, vs. A. Seessel.
s-John Loague, clerk, ETC., vs. VIM. Cast
nell & Co.
4-John League, clerk, etc, vs Williamson
Hill & Co.
estate OF Tennessee ex rel. W. o. Lonanc
VS.. B. Beaumont.
o-S. B. Beaumont vs. State OF Tennessee el
rel mayor and aldermen Of Memphis
Nv. H. Gillian vs. BENJAMIN Hunt.
s-David c. Cross VS. 8. K. Barford.
9-E. N. Apperson vs. Thomas II Logwood
l0-E. NJ AppersoH vs. Benjamin Hodges.
L-R. ). J nes & Co. vs. Pierce, Park & Co.
12-H 7. FarnswoTth ct al vs. Geo. Tieman
Librarian Barrett vs L. 0ppenheimer
I4-John Rose vs. E. M. YerRer ct al.
E-Phomas L. Rankin vs. Memphis and Gin
ctnnau packet company.
] il6-Lseey q McGhee vs. Joseph Sugarman.
h-Mississippi and Tennessee Railroad com
pany VS. Robert Wilson.
lS-B ississippi and Tennessee Railroad com
Rany vs. Francis Wilson, by next friend
W. u. LYles.
Ig-Memphis and Charleston Railroad com.
pany vs. Jerome B. Pillow.
Own. Z. Mitchell, executor, vs. William
a-P. T. Hughes vs. John NJ. Lea.
2-B Mahler vs. Phosnix Insurance Co.
81. K. Robertson vs. State Of Tennessee, for
use oflunatic hospital.
2-GroOms & Uirich vs. G. z. Theirne.
IS Daniel S. Herman vs. O. N Martin ct al
B-Michael Ford We L II. PickerelI.
H-Memphis City Railroad company VS. Jno.
CPlnau.
go. b. F. Piper VS. Martin Kelly ct al.
so. II. P. Piper vs. Augustus Hamilton.
S0-F. NJ Cash. admir-, etc, vs. John ". Davie.
81 John OvertOn vs. " II. Bolton.
S2-Felix Gallina vs. John League, clerk, etc.
S3-Rlchard g. Tucker VS. s L James.
SA-Atlantie 3 Mss 5. s. Co. vs. r. NJ. Blake
more & Co.
Matthias, clerk, etc.
38-S. NJ. Webb vs. Daniel Bland.
&c, M. Smith, ct al, vs. Pat. Dugger ct al.
8-Judah EDsel vs. Joe Banhl ct al.
39-S. n. Webb VS. John Johnson.
40-S. NJ. Webb vs. Harry Lee
Alb. Babb vs. Dunlap, MOncure & Co., ct al.
I'D WOIf vs. G. A Echerly, admir-, etc.
43-Judah Ensel VS. Joe Banfil & Co., use, etc.
44-JOs. BOrO & Co VS. John c. Saint.
45-Aurelius b. Hull, ct al, surviving part
ners, ETC., vs. Henry Wade.
46-State Of Tennessee, ex rel, L. V. Dixon,
J. E. Williams
47-Mary Frank ct al vs. T. D. Johnson ct al.
4S-Memphis City R. R. Co. VI. NJ. Sullivan.
49-H. Rapelski ct al VS. NJ. Kraus & Co.
5O-Marttn Bellows VS. s. A. Norton.
H-J. N. oliver & c. ct al VS. R. Moore & Co.
52-J. White vs. J. MussO, jr.
estate OF Tennessee vs. A. P. Burdttt e. al,
Commissioners Metropolitan police.
64-Henry Bernard ct al VS. John 3. Leach.
55-Jackson ms. Co. VS. E, NJ Sturgis.
56-German National Bank Of Memphis vs.
A. W. Potter.
57-Phoenix Ins. Co OF Hartford, vs. J.K.
Underwood, use, etc.
5S-RobertsOn, Topp ct al vs. Bank Of Ten
nessee, for use of S. Watson, trustee.
59-Rolfe Saunders vs Bartlett, Gould q
Heath.
6O-D. H. Hildebrand VS. W. L. Stewart & Bro.
6I-P. p Fraime vs. E. A. White.
62-M. ROsenfeldt& Lalkirk VS. P. O. Hughes.
63-State Of Tennessee, use OF B. r. Thomas,
vs. W. A. BickfOrd ct al.
6t-John Sp1liman VS. Mary Kelly
65-Frank Panese VS. Thomas n. B swell
ct al.
os-May9qr and Aldermen of Memphis vs.
William Sehade.
G-James Sutherland ct al vs. Martha Shell
ton.
es-John Saunders vs. A. R. Mcdonald.
6s-S. b. beaumont VS. J. H. EasOn and Gal
breath, Stewart & Co.
10-Pearce u HOol vs. Beecher, Schultz & Co.
Il Dean Wayne rs J. B. Bill & CO.
IA b. Treadwel VS. A Robinson & Co.
3S-Hesse, Levy& Co., vs. Southworth &
74-F; N: White VS. H. L. Bedford, admlnls-
traitor, etc.
75--John r. Allen VS. George E KiIburne.
76-Alnn, Aldrieh Co., vs. P. F. Bnbo.
T7-Phe Petro Engine, Stove and Gaslight
company vs. Eugene Mageveny.
7S-Mary Sullivan, administrator use, ETC.,
vs. Memphis and Charleston Railroad
company.
I'D. Il. Evans vs. Waddy Thompson,
SOP. 7 Hughes vs. L. HOughtou.
SIT. g. Bleckeley and Justices OF Shelby
county vs. state OF tennessee, ex rel,
Geo. III. Greeley and John Brown Us
state OF Tennessee, eK rel, Geo. NJ,
ST. Q. Bleckeley. chairman, ETC., VS. VIM.
Il. Cherry ct al.
ss-owners Of steamboat Q. Lloyd VS. Good
law and Isabel.
s4-Thomas P. Rubby vs. ]. NJ. Rogan.
S5-Louis 5elby VS. r. c. Brinkiey.
St-JOhn A. SJaley ct al vs. Ferree & Andrews.
6-ThOmas K. Smith ct al VS. Saml. MOsby,
receiver, etc,
Ss-Joseph Boro, surviving partner, etc.. VI
Edmund NJ. Barnum.
s9-Geo. A. Clark VS. J, NJ. Tighe.
sO-John Donovan ct al VS. the State Of Ten
nessee, use, etc.
9l-RObert Fletcher vs. James Gallagher.
g2-T. NJ. Gleason VS. M. Mitchell.
SS-MaIy A. Schoonover, executfix, etc, vs.
Mcclure, receiver.
p4-M. h. Otis & Co. vs. John G. KahIsaat.
95-U nion Bank Of Tennessee vs. ]. J. RRwl-
tngs.
98-CharIes Jones ct al VS. A. Norberg ct al.
g7-Stein & Co. VS. Straus & Blum.
eS-James wilkins, ex.vs Stephen Fransio1-
S9-Isaac Happeck and wife vs. :. n. Hartley,
use, etc.
OO-John Blackwell VS. Robert EckIin ct al.
0l-H- McDonough VS. ChOteau & Edwards.
Ford VS. William Dean & Co.
03-J Nolen ct al vs. Black, Camron & Co.
We elsh, adm r Of James Heffernan,
deceased, Va Ethel n. Porter.
05-James g. Mofatt VS. John McBrooks.
NV. Etlen, use, etc., VS. Jennie n. Nal
ton ct al.
insurance company Of Memphis
vs. Harris & Happen.
OS-3eorge 4. Hedfard vs. j. ]. Sears.
O9-The State Of Tennessee, ex rel John Nor
ton VS. John Walsh ct al.
O-Ann Carney VS. Mcdonald q Co.
He. Morrow VS. Stephens 4 Day.
12-R. Morrow VS. Stephens & Day.