Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-13

/ 6dEs
"a poles, crossing the center of a sink in STi,
TO post oak, thence south 80 east 96 polaS ' !.
the beginning, containing one hundred sc,ol
more OF less, being the same tract of land soId
on me 9tn day of March. 1861, by decree -
tnesCnaneery Court of Knox County, and H.
a Mabry became the purchaser; sale cons
1867. : - '.''''S Cont
certain tract or parcel of land, in tbo
" OF Knox, Second Civil District, bounds uh-
follows beginning at small post oaL 81 a.
with s. HowelPs line, thence with Ho1roITTo rner
north y deg and 80 min west 81 poles CrosI me
the spring branch to a double black oot t.Tsslhg
north p deg. and so min. east Al noIs,. 'uehee
small walnut, thence north 20 west Il poIoIU9 a
small post oak thence north 45 east 20 poIos 20
stake, thence north 46 east 81 poles t6 Ioa
thence south so east 81 poles to stake and sCake
tiers. thence with the line of Mrs. Morua5P PUN on
Howell to the beginning, containing ono La ana
dred acres moro or less; being the same t. uh
conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anna G T'ScI
vannes, and registered in Book Z. Vol 2 Una-
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox count, page
A certain tract of land, situated in the 1or,.-
of Knox and State of Tennessee, BOUNDED
follows: beginning at a stake pole east of ,bo
head of a spring, in the gap of ridge and cor.
ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south IN
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sapnIin,
thence south q west q poles to post oaf
thence north 30 west 1913 poles to q hickorT,
bush, thence north 80 east SO poles to a bsc{
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles to a biocG
OAK, thence north 81 east 104 poles 10 a hickorr
thence south IS poles to a small hickory. them,
east ~ poles to post oak, thence south 3j pa,,
zoe poles to a stake, thence south 20 west Is
poles to walnut stump, thence south A east y;
poles 10 the beginning, containg two bundra5
acres more or less, being the same tract conyey.
co 70 Joseph Mabry, on the 4th dav of Sen.
tcmeer, 1867 by John P Thompson, and regis.
tered in Book A, Vol. 8. page $50. -
The follOwino lots in NoISo. . N,
addition to Knoxville, to-wit: Nos. -. y ~
80. sc, "a, 60 81, 81, 81, So 70, SO. lO4 los 10'
being sixteen Lots; also Lot in Kennel
addition TO Knoxville, and ifty-six lots in n.
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville, from n"
to Sc inclusive. w.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & n,
bry's addition to Knoxville, to-wit;
1st Range South, Nos. so, 81, 10Y. ITO To-
$50, 131, !34 1876, 1913, 49, l29, I28 100 los NJ
~ lib, IA 12S, 124, 125, 126, Il, q, 3, IS ~
2d Range South 43, "a, 68, Ga, 155. 15s ~
156, al, 142, I5l, !52, 153, 15I, 60. 49, i'''
1st Range North, %, 81, 10, 100, III. III I12
III, 49, 134, los, 100, lis, III, IIG II5 ~ IiS
10, ISO, 3D. l36, 49,, 1873, p 10, %, p, 81, S
40 JOG, 123, l24, 125. 126. ~ '''
I'd Range North, 81, 50, 81. 40, 15I, 152, Is
l54, LOO l5G, l57. 158, 1885, AT, AS, 49, $50 I5g
16O, 16l, l62 Ga, 50, 49, 49,
~ acres of land lying in the I'd Civil District
OF Knox county, and described March I 1855
as beginning on spanish oak. running tbrnre
north 4o deg. and log min. east 1877 poles, thence
west pore 70 post oak stump, thence south 81
deg. west l69 poles, thence south 10 east N
poles to stump, thence to the bepinning
being part of the original Flint MI
tract and being all of said tract living North Dt
James Bells, now ThOs Z Champions nrons,
y, belonging, to A Whites estate, and benz
John Williams and j j Craig, executor, Of
Sam White, March l, 1862 by deed register.
ed in the Registers Office of Knox ceunfv in
Book A. Vol. Sd, page 4O1.
III acres of land ying in the I'd civil district Of
Knox county and bounded and described as
follows, to wit: Beginning at a stake on the
Fair Grounds fence, running thence S 62 + n
poles with said fence, thence s AZ IL poles
with said fence thence 40 Z 8 poles with said
fence, thence S % L q poles with said
fence, thence N 90 E 13I poles to a stake corner
to MaorZ and Howell, near the branch,
thence North q East with Mabrv's
line Al poles to stake, Mabry's corner, thence
north 50 west Al poles with Mabry's line, TO a
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to stake,
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry, April 81 1862,
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book Z.
Vol. Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4. and 6, as designated upon the
map of the Kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court of Knox county, in the case OF
+. W. Nsnuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to Jos. 4
Mabry by ID. A. Deaderick, G.. & NJ, Nav 9Th.
1865, by deed registered in the Registers Office
OF Knox county, in Book +. Vol 8, page 80
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry.
:. About ISL acres of land lying in the 10Th civil
district of Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Msbry now lives, and the
Same conveyed to said George w Mabrv and
Joseph A Mabry by JnO + Pate, guardian, &c,
by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county, in Book 7, Volume 2, page 243,
lands of Archie Walker - Smith anC Others.
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
Dry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
in the case of L NJ Fatio VS. P Fatio ct ais. and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, to-wit:
No. 2267, IN the case of Brownlow & Ross vs.
Lyon 4 Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
No. 2266, in same case as next above.
No. 2O65, IN case of Odell 81 Mabry ys VIII
kins 81 Freels, administrators.
No. 2OG6 in same case as next above
N. ,943, IN case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
vs. Chuschwell & Armstrong.
No. l, 944, in same case as next above
No. l,oO5, in case of Mabry & Rule V Tenn
pie Harris.
No. l,8l4, in case of Jno A Williams vs. J A
Mabry ct ais.
No. 1875, in case of Jno \ Williams vs. J \
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2,27O in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais vs. G
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
No. 1859, in case of Jno L Helms ct ais vs. g
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No. 2,0l4, in case of A & G w Mabry vs. &
4 Nee.
No. 2,O15, in case of A s G w Mabry Vs. G
4 Nee.
No. 2,016, in case of A &C W Mabry v G
A Nee.
No. los, in case of j a Mabry vs. is Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. ], 7O6, in case of Mabry vs. 5 Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. 1,7Sl, in case of A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,7S0, in case of J a Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,787, in case of j a Mabry VS. James
Bell.
No. 1,73s, in case of Mabry VS. james
Bell.
No. 1877, in case of A Mabry VS. Cowan,
,lo(Hl & (lO