Daily national Republican. (Washington City [D.C.]) 1870-1872, 1872-11-08
THE COURTS


SuPRENE COURT or THR uHITED Static
ThuTSddy, November !, lST2-On motion Of Mr..
7. 7. Cuppy, Robert 3, Warden, esq, Of Gov.
lngtOn, Ky was admitted 70 practice a. ~ a.
tOfney and counsellor Of this court.
On motion OF Mr. T, II. BARLEY, 8. Z Jennor,
eco, OF Washington, ID. q, was admitted TO
practice as an attorney and counsellor Of this
court
on motion Of Mr. 7. T. CIGntt, Hon. Jacob D.
COX, Of Cincinnati, Ohio, was admitted TO Prao-
tioe as an attorney and counsellor Of this court.
No 400. Robert q. Hedriok, piAintif 10 error,
vs.. Samuel T. Hughes. This cause was argued
by Mr.. NJ. Blair, Of counsel for the plaintiff 10
error, and BY Mr. t. I. CAN'T for the defend.
No ais. Samuel p. Brown, plaintiff in error,
vs., John M. Jolly, cashier, nc. This cause was
argued BY Mr.. II; Ashton, Of counsel for the
plaintiff In error. The court declined 10 hear
argument on the part OF the plaintiff In error.
DISTRICT CASE
No ais. Samuel p. Brown, piAintln In error,
Va John NJ, Jolly, cashier, 40. In error TO the
supreme Court Of the BlstrIot Of Columbia.
Mr.. Ohlef Justice Chase announced the decision
o. the court, atirming the judgment Of the said
No. AZ. Fhs United States, plaintiff In error,
w. jacob Singer, OF al
No. 10. The Unltsd statss, PlalnaH In error,
". John A. Van BaskiTk, ct Al. These causes
were argued by Mr.. Assistant Attorney General
Hall and Mr.. Attorney General Williams, Of
counsel for the plaintiffs In orrUT, and submitted
Sr EdSSrd koSy Tor he d:isadSntS IN error rSr
No al. The Unllod STATED, appellants, VI.
Henry J. Hunt The argument Of this cause
was commenced by Mr.. Asslstant Attorney Gen
eral Hill, Of counsel Tor the APpsllAntA, and
continued by Mr. T. J. d. Fuller TOR the APP
police.
Adjourned until to. morrow at II O'Clock.
CIRCUIT OoURT-ChisJ JuIiies CGriisr.-This
court was engaged rs follows yesterday
George AnBeTmAn was discharged from ser
vice as juror during the present term.
Thompson VS.. United States Plate Glass In.
surance Company This was an action BY =
ETRH ARuET lTla At ha ~ Vol
avenue and Fifteenth street, 70 recover from q
company insuTlng against the breakSge Of plate
glasr the value OF window and door broken by
the swinging Of heavy Iron cap against the
glass while some repairs were 10 progress. The
defence was that the policy required an hddi.
tiOnal risk 10 be taken during repairs II on no
tlee the agent OF the company thought such Ad.
dltionll rex necessary, aud that the agent had
tOld Mr.. Thompson that he considered such risk
necessary, On this point the evidence was con.
lTSdiot9ry' The jury found for the plaintiff In
Kendall VS.. smith. Judgment below aE
iTmed.
on the trial docket by agreement, and the cAss
set for trial on the l5lh Instant.
number Of routine Judgments by default
were entered o,srsroD,,
Tho following cases we're assigned for trial
today: Nos II, Is, ~, ~, 81, % ", 20 and VII.
Adjourned.
SPECIAL TERM-Judgs RyHs-ThIs court
was engaged AS follows yesterday;
skinner VI. skinner. Order confirming trus-
| tees sale.
Payne vs. Payne. Order substituting trustee
TO execute writ.
TAlbutt VS.. Talhutt. Order confirming trus.
/ tees report, and Tor distribution.
Smith vs.. Douglas. Order substituting T. ].
| NJ iller as trustee.
DoWney vs.. HOltEman. Order refusing rule to
show cause.
Grenn vs. Merrick. Order striking case from
| calendar.
DeYRughn VI. DoVaughn. Case submitted
| on exceptions,
Zsll VS. Kirk. Order Diminishing bill, and Ap.
| pOal 10 the general term. Adjourned.
| PROBATE CoURT-Judge Wildcat the Pro,
| bate OUuTDtOSlay the win Of L8Wis UaFusl was
| Med for record, He bequeRths the main por.
POLlOE.
POLICE OOuRT-JIdgs SneH-JAmes East0n,
GaIsl1E, ~. Henry Hsn.lsyL same, ~. EdHard