The Ouachita telegraph. [volume] (Monroe, La.) 1865-1889, 1872-07-27


ployer to render q years services will
be Cancelled. Judgment of s3l2.75 for
plaintiff, with costs i'll lower court he
paying costs of appeal.
Mrs. II. Harrison VS.. Sue. OF John
Adger.-The Act of Congress of June
II, 1864, relative to the limitation of
actions sshas no retroactive effect, and
this Court can give it force only from
its date and apply its benefits for the
time during which no legal process
could reach the debtor after that date"
Judgment for plaintiff for S4,9lG.4l
with legal interest from October IS,
1862, and costs of both courts.
Sue. of J. d. & Il. G. Baiicy.-cause|
to try questions of fact with
out prejudice to appeal.
r. Il. Satller w. q. w. Kimbrough
Walker 4 Naught, intcrvenors.-Claim
of intervenors against the community
between Ward and wife, and Mrs.
Smith, both deceased, is recognized to
the extent of sc, 140.o7, with legal in
tcrcst from February ~, 1869, and to be
JUSTICE WyLEY.
NJ. l.. Baker VS.. Elstner, Kinswo rthy
Il Co. - Plaintiff loaned defendants
money and took their note payable to
one Wynn, i'll order to clude his credi-
tors. Wynn then endorsed the note to
Baker, but retained it in his (Wynn's)
hands. Wynn collected the money
Baker sues to recover of the drawers.
Prayer denied plaintiff must suffer for
his own act.
Sue. of VIM. Ayrick--Opposition to
Account.-Where an appeal is taken
by motion not at the term when judg-
nent was rendered and where copy
of motion and order of appeal was not
served, but only the citation of appeal !;
held not good grounds for disnissing
the appeal. Case continued, for infor-
NAL citation.
w. l.. Cushing vs.. G. ". Robinson
ct al.-Appeal from Parish of Red
River.-The Court decides in this case
that Red River parish belongs, not to
the 18th, but to the 18th District, and
| dismisses the case because the Judge Of
the 18th District had no power to try.
Thos. GOoch ct M. vs.. ! l.. Gooch ct
al.-Where it is necessary to preserve
an estate, Il provisional administrator
regularly appointed and qualified, will
not incur the penalty of Art. 1915 II.
c., where he merely performs the duty
! oN ,t,ln nd u, hn >S,,f,
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Surghnor q Mullin vs.. J. y. Beau
champ; L. J. Larkin, intcrvenor.-Dc-
mand of plaintiffs rejected, With costs
Of both courts.
G. Is. Conncl vs.. Allen Mcdlock.-In
attachments against absentee-, service
Of petition on attorney ,d hoe and post
ing citation on courthouse door is not
sufficient Il copy Of the writ must also
be posted. Cause remandct for proper
citation.
l.. Grand Il Go. US. G. =. Cox ct al
mortgage was not stamped, tho Court
will presume that the Recorder did his
duty and required the stamps to be
affixed. Judgment against Scriber re-
duced to $500, With interest from jan
uary !, 1868; appcllccs paying costs OF
appeal.
J. T.. Houston, Admir-, vs.. W. Chill
dcrs ct al.-Chiltlers bought land ut
Shcrit1's sale, belonging to Mrs. lIo,ls-
ton, deceased, and seized under i,,dg-
n,cnt held by him against Mrs. Ioi,s-
ton, the sale being made subsequent to
the death of Mrs. II. Sale annullcd.
\ claim for rent is prescribed in three
years. Service of citation fixes the date
Of beginning u suit. Judgment amen
ded so thnt rinintiT may recover OF
defendant rent Mt the rate of $500 per
ant,u,u from March q, 1908 till Jan'y /,
1871 aud rs thus amended, Judgment
affirmed.
JUSTICE UowE.
| Hamilton n Go. vs.. !. 6. lIlstncr.--
| Defendant owned 4, wharfboat on which
goods Of plaintiffs were stored. The
| goods were removed Ia another boat