Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-11

a poles. crossing the center of sink in foIJ
to post oak, thence south SO east % poles 70
the beginning, containing one hundred aero
more or less, being the same tract of land soIj
on the 9Th day of March, 1867. by a decree of
thelChancery Court of Knox County, and Jos
A maDry became the purchaser; sale confrr1
60 at the April term of the Chancery Cont
a certain tract or parcel Of land in r.
ty fKnox, Second Civil District, boundeJ u
follows: beginning at small post oak corn as
with 5. Howelrs line, thence with HowelFs I;rl
north " deg and so min west 50 poles eros -iIis
the spring branch to double black oak, Themes
north p deg. and 30 min. east Al poIes - &C
small walnut, thence north 20 west 81 poIos 70
small post oak, thence north As east 20 Doo - -
stake thence north 46 east "a poles t6 81"
thence south so east 81 poles to stake and mo-,
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs Morgan o onJ
| Howell to the beginning, containing one bTrI
dred acres more or less being the same trac,
! conveyed to Joseph A. Mabry by Anna CSo
vannes, and registered in Book Z. Vol. 3 naoo
$50, in the Registers Office, Knox county. '0'
| A certain tract of land, situated in the COunfr
! of Knox and State of Tennessee, bounded .,
! follows: beginning at stake 1 pole east of the
| head ola spring, in the gap of ridge and cor
| ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence south IN
west 40 poles to pine and black oak sappIinr
thence south q west q poles to a post oaS
thence north SO west 1873 poles to a hickory
| bush, thence north 80 east SO poles to a blacL
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles to a black
| oak, thence north 81 east 104 poles TO hickory
thence south 76 poles to small hickory, thence
east 60 poles to post oak, thence south So east
| lSS poles to a stake, thence south 20 west Is
poles to walnut stump thence south AZ east 2G
| poles to the beginning, cOntaing two hundred
| acres more or less, being the same tract convey
| ed to Joseph A Mabry on the 4th dav of Sen.
tember 1867, by john Thompson, and regis
| tered in Book A, Vol 8. page $50
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Mabrv,s
addition to Knoxville, to-wit: Nos %, q, y
So Sc, a. go 81. 90, o. 60, 10 SO, 1OI los. 10G'
| being sixteen Lots; also Lot in Kennedy
| addition to Knoxville and ffty-six lots in Ma
bry's Flint Hill addition to Knoxville, from No
to Sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Ma.
| bry's addition to Knoxville, to-wit;
| 1st Range South, Nos 80, 81, 10Y, 10. III
$50, 49, I34, 135, 133, 1872, 129, 12S 100 los MI
| 119, 100 121 122.
ID Range South, 43. 81, IS, 81. 155. 158 10
156, al, IL, 15l, .52, 153, 154 60 '
lst Range North, %, 81, 40, 100, H. Ill, rs.
H. 49, l34, los, 100, rs, H. 1l6 115, I27, lbs
49, $780, 1885, 1876, 1877, 13S q, 10, %, y, IS 8f
40, LOG, 123, ia, rs, 12G.
ID Range North, 81, 80, 81 no. Isl, 152 152
l54 LOO l5G, 157. 15S, 159, III, 14S 149, $50 l59
lG0 16l, 49, "a, SO, So.
0t acres of land lying in the ID Civil District
of Knox county, and described March |, 1862
as beginning on spanish oak running Thence
north AZ deg. and 154 min. east IS7 poles, thence
west pole to post oak stump. thence south 10
deg. west 1863 poles, thence south 10 east n
poles to a stump, thence to the beginning
being a part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North Of
James Bells, now ThOS Il Champions pronar.
ty, belonging to A Whites estate, and beinr
the same land conveyed to Joseph A Mabrv bv
| John Williams and J j Craig. execut6rq If
Sam A White, March l, 1862, BY Iced regrsteT.
| ed in the Registers Office of Knox ceunfy in
| Book A. Vol. Sd, page 40l
10 acres OF land lying in the ID civil district of
Knox county and bounded and described os
follows, to wit: Beginning at q stake on The
| Fair Grounds fence, running thence S GO f. u
| poles with said fence thence A II poles
| with said fence, thence 40 L 81 poles with said
fence, thence 5 % II poles with said
fence, thence SO Z 13l poles to a stake corner
TO Mabry and Howell, near the branch
thence North % East with Mabry's
line Al poles to a stake, Mabrys corner, thence
north 80 west Al poles with Mabry's line to a
| stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry April %, 1862
| by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
Registers Office of Knox county, in Book f.
| Vol. Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4, and 6, as designated upon the
map OF the Kennedy property file in the
| Chaneery Court of Knox county, in the case of
+. w. Vanuxem and wife VS. James Kennedy
| ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to JOS A.
Mabry by ID. A. Deaderick, c. & NJ, May 7th,
1865, by deed registered in the Registers Office
| of Knox county, in Book L. Vol g. page $40
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
| property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About ISL acres of land lying in the 10Th civil
district of Knox county, being the same tract
| on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
Joseph A Mabry by Jno + Pate guardian, &c,
by deed registered in the Registers office Of
Knox county, in Book Y, Volume 2, page 243,
and dated May g. 1853. Said land adjoins the
lands of Archie Walker, - Smith anG others,
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
in the case of l. NJ Fatio VS. P Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee, to-wit
No. 2267, in the case of Brownlow & Ross VS.
Lyon y Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
No. 2266, IN same case as next above
No. 2O65 in case of Odell & Mabry VS. VIII
kiDs 81 Freels, administrators
No. 2O66, in same case as neNt above
n. ], 943, in case of Joseph A Mabry and wife
vs. Chuschwell s. Armstrong.
No. ], 944, IN same case as next above
No. 1905, in case of Mabry 81 Rule V Tenn
pie Harris.
No. 1901, in some case as next above.
No. 1874, in case of JnO A Williams VS. J y
Mabry ct ais.
No. 1875 in case of Jno \ Williams VS. J \
mdOTy eL ais.
No. :, 30, in case of Jno Helms ct ais V &
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais.
No. 2,269, in case of Jno Helms ct all vs. G.
Mynatt admir-, ct ais
No. 2014, in case of j A & g w Mabry VS. c
a Nee.
No. 2Ol5, in case of y & 6 w Mabry V C.
A Nee.
No. 2O1G, in case of j n s. G w Mabry vs. G
A Nee.
No. ,7O5, in case of J A Mabry vs. T S Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. !, 7O6, in case of J A AIabry vs. Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. ,731, in case of y Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. ], 730, in case Of J \ Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves
No. 1,737, in case of y Mabry vs. james
Bell.
No. 1,73s, in case Of J Mabry VS. James
Bell
No. 1877, in case of J a Mabry VS. Cowan,
McClung IL Co.
No 1919 in case of j A Mabry VS. MI