, 1872-11-02

az aa Should not issue against them for
s torial article s % On The Ralerty % Case" IN the
journal Of Oct 16- Mr. Edward A.. Chambers,
gaoa of ossg ne serns for e.
nespoudeats reached here early this morning with the
answer Of Messrs Wilson and shnqan, and duly fled
the same = IN The Office Of Major ". NJ. Taylor, the
At the opening Of the court after the dspoaition Of
m ne os n be Of Peop
Illinois +. Wilson and shuman was made retutnahle
this morning. Is the Attorney General in court?"
The Attorney General-Yes, cir,
The Chief Justce-1s there any answer in this
case?
The Attorney aeneral-The answers were filed this
was called to the fact. Mr. Chambers represents Mr.
Beckwith attorney for the respondents. He tells
case orally but is content to submit the case npon the
answers Of the respondents filed this morning had
desired, myself, to make an oral argument In tbs
case but, inasmuch they have declined to do 1t,
do not desire TO do 80 myself. would Ike however,
to submit some authorities touching the application
for the writ With that shall content myself and do
not desire to argue the case orally.
The Chief Justice-Does the answer set up justhca-
ton?
reht-the legal rght-to make the publication which
appeared in the paper and which is set ont in the a-
The Chief Justice-Does any one desire to appear
The Attorney General-No; one one ar. chHmbers s Is
they not desire to argue it, or submit any authorl-
ties and shall not appear In the case except by their
written answers which are now % On !. me- anu nnaer
The Chief Justice-As the Attorney General states
that the answers cot up matter Of Justification the
Court will take the case under ayisement until next
| Wednesday morning, Meanwhile, arguments can be
filed either behalf Of the people OF the respondents,
The Attorney aeneral--1 desire to file brief, sir.
The Chief Justice-certainly; these arguments
should be fled m early az u m
on Wednesday morning as to whether IN attachment
| should issue.
! Wednesday morning, Nov. 6.
The respondents answers etste, In substance that
there no intended isrespect to the Court BY the
vas to inpress upon the public and the next Legsla.
ture the necessity Of change in our criminal laws
and that they claim the right to publish or comment
upon any matter Of public concern.
THE DOCKET.
OTTAWA, H., Nov 1.-The Supreme Court met at Il
o'clock this morning there being full bench, and
| transacted the following business:
| NEW MOTIONS.
IL. Peop1e's Docket, Mr. Ingersol for the re1otor
moved Tor continuance, in order to allow oppor
tunty Of taking the testimony Of material witness
now in New Orleans.
tension Of tio to file reply to the argument Of ths
| appellant on Fehearing.
27o. Mr. 1ngersoll for the appellee hled cross @ or
3s2 Champion '. Ulner, motion to place The ca.,a
on the hearing docket and for leave Tor pla1ua0 II
error to lille brief and abatract in thirty days.
$50. Motion to file additional record on affidavit
flied by the appellant; counter ahdavits fled BY tn
10, Wilson ', Sawyer. Stipulation filed for IN ex
tension Of time to file briefs and abstract By the plain
tiff in error, and motion to have the cauee placed o.
III. E. F: Bull moved that H. ". Perkins, from th
State Of Iowa, and Mr. Hays and J, B. Rowlen. frol
the State of Michigan be admitted to the practice
Law in this State.