The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1872-11-01

signature Of Mr. Tweed. Mr. Tremain showed the bills
c 81 q he snn was
was not chairman Of the Committee that Mr. Tweed
Ss eat hs
that MaySr a 70 County .DS "a
sn n together all the and liabilities Of the city
as' We m ne B By dc N, n5e
showed other accounts which Were signed only sWilsm
was naG that
by Juror-What is the amount OF that warrant
| not signed by Mr.. TweedS
MT. Peckham said that 1t was warrant for
menced in 1860.
Mr.. Tremain said that it was in evidence that
these frauds had been made public in July, 1871
ana then read an extract from the message OF the
Mayor 70 the Board Of supervisors on the sd OF
August 1871, and also commented at length upon
the resolution passed by the Board OF Audit and
drafted BY the Mayor comforting the power of
examination OF claims to committee
The Court took recess at half past one O'Clock
After Recess.
The Court having reassembled,
oMs the & ne out n M
work already done but for work to be done These bills
e
abe about two and sST no, dollars
IL; s$1 ]
8 sna eS
70 s S"s f law h me a
as S s pds4s ng pssc duties Ssr
nls for r. N ss as Ss Gr acts
MAS MAS evidence Si what the law eonsidsred completely
f Nf 'fsss SHOW 11fs s s ms Sh
esty ~ d not MS mat s ne' did
ep e af did no
hsy Mayor pSr!sps great RHs
city and when Garsey says a large part Of them are
s s % then s and
a their S e s
the verdict they might render.
Mr.; Tremain was listened to with great atten;
ton by all in the crowded court room until he had
concluded
Judge Brady proceeded amid deep silence to
charge the jury.
yp pE ,B nRADys CHARGE ,.r..,.
s a% S Is Sssd"s nsr mSs ss
s hos s'sis
s9e q Sss
There is but one platform in the adrnisraon Of JUS.
sss az! g. 1Hs
IN h hs q
Judge are ane s s a s sepaa The prS e
nss ,,.s nns S"y.d. sSsig.S&
exclusively Is to utter the rules Of law by which The de-
t as De o s YEN
y arc sa'a hs 81 aE
features q without prejudice for against the
sM any he a T n
svSs az %s: S'ss
sm S ba ss sn?Rh s n ns to Sc ssSs
s ana Of s se mot ne
warranted and the conclusions they draw
jury don't intend in presen ting the views that enter
IL
denee 40 uhaye listened e i patiently asst was yoar
s
isget%sr yos are consider he rights '" and
tits sn % The
SsSson That hs @ ne sss % f n
&c yin S
ne sns
df t
has in at
K s% iSs sss
sss s sS sS and what rs
@
%s!hssy .nss II.
Auditor s Ins to
adjust to pass upon to settle and l. matters not whether
SIaiIy nss,ses ssIass iRisnas.s'y
s Serse remit consists Or the or
2 O. ana
thereof enough to show neglect prove have
I fsi x audit
pie claim from facts and circumsances, have shown
Evidence that 81 SUBJECT the The s nH
reference to audit ministerial The resolution is
CoMPrRoiLER's OFFICE, May s. 1870:
THE IN as s a%s aas5 and BY
on motion Of the Mayor i Is resolved that the County
Of he ef
na sf
I pr he % ]
payment Hl Hfkhf Il Sz A&E AfSsf'
RICHARD B. CONNOLLY, Comptroller.
II the design of that gather the bills
% Sd sss =
ns 5 Dss s as Ts ais' ss ss
ss. lid If ns
sa'aSy a. end ssssss ss
in Anticipation and w,hsas de
signing further examination, intending accept the
ticates contemplated and without anything than
mere ministerial act such signing the papersf il
then there was audit such as Is required by law no
hearing examination II the resolution meant other
wise that is that the collection should be made for the
advisement of the board, then have the people
that they did not in fact audit in the manner conem
by This fact Is for to determine all the evil
dence to which you have listened. II you are satisfied
that there audit, was the omission ntentonais
This IL because the intention forms
ton element in this prosecutions not merely careessnes
or Misrepresentation. and that is TO be
determined by just and proper OF ali the
facts and disclosed by INC evidence bear
plated proceeding audit reference to the Board of
Supervisors and authorization which
to be obtained from. it should be considered and
In order to make this clear aliude the OF The
People Brooks, in the lst Of DEMO, in which
case q man was indicted for refusing to admin
lister an OATH He convicted, and the Court said that
when asked TO administer the oath he knew per-