Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-25


to post oak, thence south so east 90 poles -
the beginning, containing one hundred scrs1
more or less, being the same tract Of land soi5
on on the 9tn day Of March, 1867, by a decree ~
theiCnancery Court of Knox county, and IL
A Mabry became the purchaser; sale cons.
1867. Cont
A certain tract or parcel of land, in the no.
ty OF Knox, Second Civil District, bounded u
follows: beginning at small post oak 60. as
with s. Howelps line, thence with Howalf,o1 Iier
north ~ deg and 80 min. west 50 poles lne
the spring branch to double black oat tSSlng
north % deg. and 80 min east Al poIes 1tiee
small walnut; thence north 20 west 81 poles f. a
small post oak, thence north 45 east 20 noIo.
stake thence north 46 east "a poles TO Sto Tos
thence south 80 east 81 poles to stake ana
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs. MorgorP o pm;
Howell to the beginning, containing one b ana
dred acres more or less being the same traa.
conveyed to Joseph A. EAbry by Anns' T TSet
vannes, and registered in Book E. Vol : ma,
$50, in the Registsr's Office, Knox county p0s7
A certain tract of land, situated in the Com.
| of Knox and State of Tennessee, boundoJ
follows: beginning at a stake pole east of "a, as
head ola spring, in the gap of ridge and cue uo
| ner with the VIM. Swan farm, thence sout5 e.
west 40 poles to pine and black oak san ,SI "
thence south q west % poles to e p6st nngg'
| thence north SO west 1913 poles to bicGoaLA
| bush, thence north 50 east SO poles to MY
oak, thence north 81 west 146 poles to a bIaci
thence south 76 poles to a small hickory fbouyy
east GO poles to post oak, thence south * e a
| 1873 poles to stake, thence south % NO.. 'a ~
poles to walnut stump thence south a eos. 20 70
poles to the beginning, containg two bun5r-a193
acres more or less, being the same tract nonI
ed to Joseph A Mabry, on the 4th dav oF Se
TENDER, 1862, by John p Thompson. and -oeP
tered in Book A, Vol 8, page $50. AeSE'
| The following lots in Nelson, Swan & Nob.-,
addition TO h N to-wlt: Nos. 2, q 5s
80, &C. 81, 90 81, g., 81, SO, 70, SO, IOl los 16S
being sixteen Lots; also Lot in Kenn,adIyUygS,
addition to Knoxville and ffty-six lots in NJ.
brys Flint Hill addition to Knoxville from, Ma
| | to Sc inclusive.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & No
bry's addition to Knoxville, to-wit;
ist Range South, Nos so, 81, i07, 10 1o-
$50, 131, 1884, 135, 133, 1872 129 lbs i0g iES ~,
10, 113, IA 12s, 124, 125, 126, II, p, q, Is ~
10, 40, 12l, 122. ~
ID Range South 43, 81, 63, Ga, 155. ISIS IN
15G, al, AZ I51, 80, 15S, 154, 60. -' ''''
LIST Range North, q, 81, no. 100, ia, III, rs
112, 49, 134, l05, 100, 118 III, 116, lis III IN
129, $50, 135, 13G, 137, 1873, D. 10, % p. Sc "a
49, Jog, 123, 124, 125, 126. - ''
I'd Range North, 81, SO, 81 40. Isl. 152 15s
154, 155 156, 157, 15S, $780, AZ, 148, l49 $50 I5g
| 160, l61, 1872, 81, go. So. ''
20i acres of land lying in the ID Civil District
of Knox county, and described March |, 1853
as beginning on spanish oak, running thence
north 40 deg. and 10y min. east 1S7 poles. thence
westl pole to pest oak stump, thence south 81
deg. west lG9 poles, thence south 10 east "a
poles to stump, thence to the beginning
being a part of the original Flint Hill
tract and being all of said tract lying North Of
James Bells, now Thos L Champions proper
ty, belonging to A Whites estate. and being
the same land conveyed to Joseph 4 Mabry BIZ
John Williams and j J Craig, executors Of
Sam \ White, March l. 1862 by deed register
ed in the Registers Office of Knox county, in
Book A. Vol. Sd, page 401
10 acres of land lying in the I'd civil district Of
Knox county and bounded and described As
follows, to wit: Beginning at a stake on the
Far Grounds fence, running thence s 81 Z Z
poles with said fence, thence S AZ E II poles
with said fence thence 40 4 8 poles with said
fence, thence 25 4 q poles with said
fence, thence N 96 Z 13l poles to a stake corner
to Mabry and Howell, near the branch,
thence North % East with Mabrys
line Al poles to a stake, Mabry's corner, thence
north So west Al poles with Mabry's line, to u
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake.
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry, April %, 1862
by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
register once OF Knox county, in Book l..
Vol. Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4. 5 and 6, as designated upon the
map of the Kennedy property on file in the
Chancery Court of Knox county, in the case Of
r. W. Vanuxem and wife VS.. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to JOS A.
Mabry by ID. A. Deaderick, q. & NJ, May 7th
1865, by deed registered in the Registers Office
OF Knox county, in Book Z. Vol. 3, page $40
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
, property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 98l acres of land lying in the 10th civil
district OF Knox county, being the same tract
on which George w Mabry now lives, and the
same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph A Mabry by Jno + Pate, guardian, &c,
by deed registered in the Registers office OF
Knox county, in Book Y, Volume 2, page 243,
| and dated Nav .. 1873 Said 1opd od;o;yz Che
lands of Archie Walker, Smith anG Others,
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox Co.
in the case of l. NJ Fatio VS. P Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals of the State of Tennersee to-wit
No. 2,267, in the case of Brownlow & Ross VS.
Lyon q Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais.
No. Z266, IN same case as next above
No. 2O65, in case of Odell s. Mabry VS. vii.
kiDs IL Freels, administrators
! No. ZU66, IN same case as neNt above
n. ,943, in case Of Joseph A Mabry and wife
VS. Chuschwell 81 Armstrong.
| No. ], 944, in same case as next above
No. 1905, in case of Mabry & Rule vs TEN
pie Harris.
No. / ,804, in some case as next above.
No. ,0l4, In case of JnO A Williams VS. A
Mabry ct ais.
NO. l,olo, IN case o. JnO y Williams rs i
Mabry ct ais.
No. 2,270 in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais vs. e
. Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
No. 2, 269, in case of Jno Helms ct ais vs. &
Mynatt admir- ct ais.
No 2O14, in case of J A & G W Mabry vs. c
y Nee.
No, 2015, in case of j A s. G. W Mabry vs. {
A Nee.
No. 2,OlG, in case of j A & G W Mabry v. c
A Nee.
No. ,7O5. in case of j A Mabry VS. T Webb.
admir-, &c
No. l, 7O6, in case of j A Mabry vs. 7 5 Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. 1,731, in case of A Mabry vs. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,73O in case of j A Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1877, in case of j a Mabry vs. james
Bell.
No. 1,738, in case of j A Mabry vs. james
Bell.
No. 1927, in case of A Mabry VS. COwan
McClung s. Co.
0f0 in co-o If + A M,br,y Nj l.