Orangeburg times. [volume] (Orangeburg, S.C.) 1872-1875, 1872-04-24

.He s:tcs aHQ rerinikol i1iiSsioncrS, were
ditleramt portions of the rcai estate of SW. r.
il.!readweH, under the order Of cort aforesaid
Il here vas no evidence shown Of my labjt,sUt
or protest, Claim on the, nnrt of AIrs. Troad-
wei; on the contrary, ilicSwas il6ts6niY rGii,tif
in the complaint for pirti;un :,,ia .ae, lSe y@;ia
the iotsiu dispute. ''' NSe SilrtFla'
Mr. Glover, the referee, testified that the estate
of TrcalwcN was, in his opinion perfectly sol
vent. Tia; the debts presented did not ;llrottn;
to more than 81 800 90 including cd4 ;iastltlEtt
she amount aiicidy realized from safes OF lands
Nas from to 100000 doR:.rs, and that otlicr'
lands remained tor safe, and that the pcys,jnat
property had rcai2cd from seven to eit!it li.il-
,ircd doHurs. .i ifiS IN
FROM these fact, after l,c,ring itlN argument
of counsel OH both sides, and from my co,str,ic-
tomof thc Constitution and the acts Of l!re Cen
erai -siupb by, bic upiinion of tliis court is that
there wnsno right o.tstate Of l,o,acatcal iii Wiz,
ham X. TrcadwcR, at The time ofhis death, which
epnd survive 10 his',wi,iow. itsl estate was
more than solvent, and ! think Insolvency am.
| il.qmcstc:(H inSepcrlhiy ,pn,mcicd. tnlcr. the
hts it never is NECESSARY 10 sctotIhdmestdad un-
L i tGe u" iSss Sf5.tsaH 4 ,scd 81" g s;
coerciye process. Neither the spirit or fct.Sroi
the law contemplated anything p,ure u.a,, that
not shouM not be deprived i}y nnv conlp,i'soitN
proccedingl ofaPuF his property, nd 80 made Il
beggar. 1T never WAS intended th:i wiien one
ws ~ competent circln ancs a:l,l ;i,ic to ,,sv
everything and stW have an - an,,;n!ec ,or im-
scifanl family. lie '.!olM stiHbc aNAbertv 10
transmit 10 his family, Whom hc hcd js,ord.d tcr,
this right 10 c!iin another silsrc q! i.i estate
from ais creditors under the iaunc uf o.tc-ci,!.
INV. l.. TrcadwcH had no right o. cili.n o.
hrhcstclilp 81! the time al! his trlh, ,s Is l.rot-
r.dctl III the first and pur; section o the nc,,
there Is notinc; To continue turthc benefit ot Hi.
widow and children, and t!!cvarr not .enttied'
toa cStaeor right ot Homestead :,s provided
r'Stt' $. which is the authority rciic,l on
The idea Is cicartv that one should not be SOLD
| on Of house ans! home, and after his dc,tll, The
$tine protection is preserved for the benefit uf
his wife and children
| !ltwonM be 81 n.onstvous doctrine to hold li;,
the Ew mean: any more than that the right oi
lp'pcSleh existing IN Il MAJ! ut tic time OF his
tt.ui,, which was =; reasonable amount OF pro-
pert, Src.3a trt. !, Cons,t and which he
r"'pd c'a'!l only wheusprc.Yy hy levy, sto,,f,i
Us secured TO himself a;.,l 10 his NHiiv to save
thcm from destruction and want and .whi,I.
'ghtwa' cofdinucdt4 the willow 10 be exercised
onN II he could have exercised it, td VIII: IYht,,
prf'scl by levy. Nor IN this ,-ci5 thor. any
reason I" put -uc. fnrcc'i construction ON lie
act Thew.dow ind rl;is are an,i. .:raovitc.l
4 &, a,d h.! widow ,.,rting lo:,ahc .i,-. to-
vi aasIneo'at ilc pNe, ~. naa is ~, ,,,,,
"WheT q ia'S> par! al irc trt. Z, i. i:o
''iipr' isyr, y, 10 w. ~. 60 r ipi fnfc4.s,
,hirin,r:..i.,i ,i,,' Z" - at/,f IL
III, "n"'" =. ~ "a
ifty,,, b94S5Sa Ssa Z = s,,... sfS asSa,s
,.,. I,''". ....,,,, ~ ..4
I'LL, .n;xkfHLnF b '"','
i,i,p lg,AAT&S s'sE, sygsRki
20 ''b,s a'TRe
.t0,;, rn ..rh ~ ~
;,.,, .)n.i,..,,i,., ~
c,r,.,4 Il, i, :, 'l,f III
u eI,.,n, ,.tI,.tA,, ar..,..,.,,,s
i '1,.. XII. H. ~ ,'.'t'-fj'5@"' .t
-h,,v ,.r,,,.. ,rr "'t' ~
,l,,la,f H.,
th.r .hi.,.,r.jn., ,''
i.irg w,.L ,!,. ;,.",n.,
ii.... ;r,o, IT,
'ir,a,lrrl. hc,.
d. oii",ta3r. lna9..,..3 ...t ,y ,r'..'
I, ,i.,, c.,,-, t.,. .i.,rI ,c;..t.,,