Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1872-08-21

a poles. crossing the center of sink in se a,
70 post oak, thence south so east 90 poles -
the beginning, containing one hundred scroD
more OF Tess, being the same tract of land soIJ
on the 9Th day of March, 1867, by deHroeo O, "a
Itne;Cnancery Court of Knox county. and IT, o
A. Ma6ry became the purchaser; sale cons
ed at the April term of the Chancerv Con..
A certain tract or parcel land in a.
~ OF Knox, Second Civil District benndoo93 uh-
| follows beginning at small post GAL ~ as
with ). HowelPs line, thence with Hor,oTTo rner
north Y deg. and 80 min. west 81 poles or me
the SPITE Dranc9 TO a double black oak, tbenass
small walnut, thence north 20 west n noIoI9
small post oak, thence north 45 east IN 49, 70
stake, thence north 46 east "a poles n Ioa
thence south 80 east 81 poles to stake and se
tiers, thence with the line of Mrs. Morgan sn5
Howell to the beginning, containing one b anu
dred acres more or less; being the same t,al,
conveyed to Joseph A Mabry bv Anno0 S 1Tact
vannes, and registered in Book E Vol 3 ma.
| 539, IN the Registers Office, Knox countv' page
"A certain tract of land, situated in the Copnt,.
OF hnox and State of Tennessee boundeJ
follows: beginning at stake poleeast of ,S a'
nead OF a spring, in the gap of ridge and coz
her with the VIM. Swan farm thence son,b eo
NEST ~ poles to pine and black oak sannj;n,
thenco SCUM 20 u west q poles to post oa5
ousn, thence north so east Sc poles TO a 6oo{{
| oaS, tnence north 81 west I46 noIns 70 " JoChS
oar tnence north 81 east 1O4 poles 10 b;cIorT,'N
oaet en- soIon 20 poles to small hickory tbenSs
9ooG " Poes 10 post oak thence sOut6 q co..
| loS poles to stake, thence sontb So % eaSt
PoIes 70 walnut stump, thence south AZ ees, %
poles to the beginning containg two bnT'5tz99
acres more 8 or ,es, being the same tract conva
te 10 s9 bv I oSy on the 4th day of Sep
tered in Book A, Vol. 5. page $50 - anu regis
| The following lots in Nelson. Swan &.,
| addltlon 10 hnOxyllle to-wit: Nos. - D. 35o >
30 81, o. 20 81, 62 81, &c. 20, SO, IO4 IO5 ,6 e.
| addition to Knoxville, and fftv-six IotS
bry'S Flint Hill addition to Knoxville f- ~ Ma
| | to Sc inclusive. i'oni NO.
The following lots in Nelson, Swan & N.
bry's addition to Knoxville, to-wit; I'd
,aa t ~, range 1S SOUTH SS 10. Nos 30 81 1O7 10 IN
IL IL "a 12S, 12I, 12j, 126, II, p b * d.
ID Range South, 43, 81, 60. Ga, 155. LIS =,
l56, IA, l42 l5l, !52 153. 154 60. -''' i0%
=, 5st Range North, % 81, ITO, 100, III, Ill 11a
IL !..5 !34, lU0, lO9, lis, H. 11G rs I21 i5s'
10 $780, 135, 1856, 1877, 1873, p 10. % y Is - -
30, Jog, 123, I24, 125. 126. ~ o. "',
ID Range North, 81, 50, 81 40 I51 159 =.
led LOO ISG l57 l5S, 159, AZ, AS, 40, 80 Ia
| l6O, l6l, 49, "a, 60 49, - Nv 49,
! Af acres of land lying in the ID Civil Di.,-i,,
OF Knox county, ana described March IseS
as beginning on spanish oak, runnino tbrnrr
north 48 deg. and l5l min. east 187 poIre tbCnCo
WestI pole to post oak stump, thence soutb ~
ueg, west IOJ poles, thence south ~ east 3
poles to stump, thence to the beoirnn -
beng a part of the original Flint hi
| tract and being all of said tract Ivinc VOr,b IS
James Bells now ThOs Champi0n's nrona,
tty, belonging to a Whites estate. and BENZ
I me- same iand conveyed to JGsephA Mabry By
John Williams and j J Craig executors If
Sam A White, March l, 1862. BY deed regystar.
| ed IN the Registers Office of Knox ceunfS n
Book A Vol; Sd, page 401.
III acres OF land lying in the I'd civil district of
Knox county and bounded and described a.
| follows, to wit: Beginning at a stake ON tbo
Fair Grounds fence, running thence s 60 F p
| poles with said fence, thence S Al + IA noIo-
with said fence, thence 40 poles with said
fence thence 5 . Z q poles with said
to Mabry and Howell, near the branch,
thence North % East with Nabrv1
| line Al poles to stake, Mabry's corner thence
north 90 west Al poles with Mabry's line to \
stake, thence north AZ west 10 poles to a stake.
thence to the beginning, being the same tract
conveyed to Joseph 4 MabTy. April y. iSI;S
| by James Atkins, by deed registered in the
registers Office of Knox county in Book T.
| Vol Sd, page 245.
Lots Nos. 4. and 6, as designated upon the
Chancery Court of Knox county, in the case of
+. w. fanuxem and wife vs. James Kennedy
ct ais, and the same lots conveyed to JOS A.
Mabry by D. A. Deaderick, G. & ~, May Eth,
IS6S, by deed registered in the Register Office
| OF Knox county, in Book f. Vol. 3, page 80
The foregoing real estate levied upon as the
property of Joseph A. Mabry.
About 9Sl acres of land lying in the 10th civil
district OF knox county, being the same tract
on which George W Mabry now lives, and the
same conveyed to said George w Mabry and
Joseph Mabry by Jno + Pate, guardian, &c,
by deed registered in the Registers office of
Knox county, in Book Y, Volume 2, page 243,
and dated May 3, 1853. Said land adjoins the
LAM M n oil I'll
and levied on as the property of Geo. w Ma
bry.
The writs of Fieri Facias under which said
property will be sold are as follows:
One issued from Chancery Court of Knox co,
in the case of l. III Fatio VS. P Fatio ct ais, and
the following from the Supreme Court of Errors
and Appeals OF the State of Tennersee, to-wt:
No. 2,267, in the case of Brownlow & Ross VS.
Lyon u Ramsey, trustees, &c, ct ais
No. 2,266, IN same case as next above.
No. 1000, in case of Odell s. Mabry VS. VIII
kiDs & Freels, administrators.
No. 2O66, IN same case as neNt above
N. l,943, in case of Joseph A Mabrv and wife
VS. Chusehwell & Armstrong.
No. I,944, IN same case as next above
pie Harris.
No. ], S04, in some case as next above.
No. 1874, IN case of JnO Williams VS. A
Mabry ct ais.
No. 1915, in case of Jno A Williams vs \
No. 2,270, in case of Jno Helms ct ais VS. 6
Mynatt, admir-, ct ais
No. 2,269, in case of Jno Z Helms ct ais VS. G
Mynatt admir-, ct ais
No. 20l4, in case of A & G w Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. 2015, in case of A & G W Mabry vs. c
A Nee.
No. 2,016, in case of n s G W Mabry vs. G
A Nee.
No. Los, in case of j a Mabry vs. 7 Webb,
admir- &c.
No. !, 7O6, in case of j A Mabry VS. T 5 Webb,
admir-, &c.
No. 1,731, in case of A Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves
No. ], 73O, in case of j \ Mabry VS. Geo Mar
graves.
No. 1,737, in case of n Mabry VS. james
Bell
No. lbs, in case of J A Mabry vs. james
Bell
No. 1,827, in case of Mabry VS. Cowan,
McClung & Co.