New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1872-05-28
THE COURTS.


Dmlteu 1EtAltA AlEcWlt COURT
United States VS. (. j. Gay ct al.-Tht
United States having cOnfseated, in 1864
SIS, 1000 in gold, which at the time was in
curse of c0nveyances from New Orleans to
BAYOU Sara, said to be in rebellion against
the United States. E. j. Gay came forward
as claimant A libel of information was
fled in the United States District Court
the cause was heard, and the decree made
giving the gold to the claimant. The case
Court, the former Judgment was reversed,
the gold condemned, and William Agar,
surety, ordered to pay. The case was then
appealed to the United States Supreme
Court, and is now on its travels.
Myra Clark Gaines against p Agnelly ct
ais. p. Fouehe granted leave to file sup
Elemental petition.
The number Of 14,lOO cigars, against
which there was a libel, was declared for
feited.
United States District COurt-In Bank
ruptcy.
In the matter Of +. Mouney the commits
siOner's report was approved, and the
claims Of Mrs. Mouney and John Me Witty,
for payment By preference, rejected.
In the matter Of j. Ryback the assignee
is to show cause, on the twenty-ninth in
slant, why he should not pay LATTE, Du-
flhO d Co., agents, the sum Of SI249 for
rent.
In the matter Of w r. Buddendorff the
assignee, and Nicholas Bailey, curator of
AIDE Layigne, are ordered to show cause
why Mrs. Marie Eve Ceeile Taylor should
not be paid by preference, over all other
creditors, the sum of Sl3,3 800 60, to the con
currence of proceeds of sale in his hands
This rule was submitted for decision.
In the matter Of w ii. DOnahO, accounts
approved, the accounts homolOgated and
the assignee discharged.
United States District COurt-In Admiralty
W. II. Leeds VS.. ship Victory. William
Cushing, master, and all parties in interest,
TO show cause on the thirtieth instant why
the ship shonld not be sold and the price
paid into the registry.
G. S. Riggs vs. certain raft Of walnut
timber, An appeal from the Judgment
against claimant, returnable in the Circuit
Court on the first Monday in November
next, allowed.
A. AIiltenberger and E. Z. Norton vs.. W.
N Mercer. The jury found verdict for
the defendant.
William Patterson ct ais. VS.. the steamer
Belle Ida. The commissioners report is APP
proved, and the funds arising from the sale
of the steamer Belle Ida are ordered to be
distributed as follows; Law charges-Clerk,
$225 so; marshal, $649 43; registrar, $751;
appraiser, II. g. HEART, 1913; M. NJ. Cohen,
for reports, $lO0. Payments to mariners
already allowed-G n. Sanford, $2l IS; j.
Moray, $l3 so: j. r, Smith, $50; J. Monitor,
$50; III. jackson, So; w. Patterson, SAB; j..
Robinson, So William Taylor, SIS; VII
liam Burke, $40 80; A. Fuller, $62 SO;
Thomas jackson, $l2; William De Harm,
$l3 50 Alfred Ewing, SIG so; S. d. Moore,
$40; William Higgins, gl4i John III Higgins,
So; j. w. Rugg, S24; j. .Kreuse, $50; X. ID.
Shannon $102 So Harry w Bailey, S35 s.;
William Enstivite, SIS; g. w. Radabaugh,
$44. Materials and labor repairs--Wi
Wells, 1920 50 G. Pitard $22 49, N. Glas-
ser, $29 81; L. f. Generes, $40 O8; w G.
Wilmot, S. 50; tug Reliance, SIS rs; John
Thompson, so u; William H. Smith,
Sal u; d. G. MeCaurgon, SI27 40; J. s.
Simonds & Co, $43 q; j. A. Brown, $40 70;
q. II. Brady, S39 O9; James Woods, $44 10;
L. +. Briggs, 1913; S. D. Moore, S34 rs; At
takapas Mail Company, $I47. Future costs
$50 40. Total-$3l60
Supreme Court
The following decisions vera rendered
yesterday:
REHEARINGs REFUSED.
Mary E. Brown vs.. Julia A. Brown and
Merchants Mutual Insurance Company
vs.. the Orleans Mutual Insurance Cone
+. s Eppenbauer vs.. Durlln & sawin ct
Richard F. Yinson, administrator, VS..
Numa Wives.
Charles Gayarre vs.. G. Sabatier.
John Frazier VS.. Samuel Parson, sheriff.
Marie Mathilde Countess de Bethune, VS..
Levy & Schneider.
Gnstavus S. Rousseau ct ais VS.. Shade
Ann GaYaFre ct ais.
j. NJ Wells VS.. G.. Ehrstein.
F. B. Lambeth, widow. vs.. F. B. de Belle
vue.
Eliza Dolson vs.. John slattery.
Paul o. Hebert, tutor, VS.. Independence
Joseph n. Willard ct ais. VS.. John H.
Peyton.
NJ Lara vs.. Charles T. Nash ct ais.
Emanuel Blessey, Wheeling Iron and /
Nail Company and Harrison, Brother g. Co, /
VS.. Edward Kearneg ct ais.
sIANDAAIUs PEREAIProRY.
State on the relation Of Mrs. Amanda M. /
= Simonds administrators, vs. the Judge of l
the Sixth District Court for the parish Of /
Orleans.
Second District Court.
Succession Of w. T. keenan,. James G. i
TarletOn, as curator of the above succession, 1
opposes the account filed BY George L. /
Phifer, the liquidator of the firm of Keenan,, /
Norris d Ph1ter, OF which the deceased was /
a partner, on the ground that among the /
credits on SAID account Is an item of /
$I0,3i0 81 received from G. B. POLK. which /
is not correct, the said c. B. Polk. at the /
time Of the death Of w T. keenan,. being |
indebted to said firm in large sum Of
money, to secure which he gave Ills note te
said firm, secured by mortgage on said
Folks plantation, for an amount set out ia
said account filed by said Phifer as afore-
said; that said Phifer had said plantation
sold to satisfy the debts due the said firm,
on the fourteenth OF May, 1868, and bought
the same, and had the purchase money
credited on the account Of G.. B. Polk, and
that the said Phifer then took said planta-
Ton as his own nronertH and gave credit to