The New York herald., 1872-12-11

taS Heath ass ana Raphas
this
q me for clients e
s Ps a
Sas and frs %
s
y rsspsst asa Erie sSohn ar IN reps
and FISK in Railway n
al and with them neither nor any 9fm partners have
ns, nSw aiisS I'VE sxsfytSlng that las
snd a
alone i Is 1Ssd nSw e attend Jgs snrnasd or
caaittsS, Of veuys,x he found guilty Seven of
to TO '6s s
ion or the seven sasau orders Ave wore granted
inc here Sss 0 ores s but Sose
wn which Sa hsS as nd There are re-
Z @ SdsSs
s Ss On ouI ds s
70 s right f too ac 70 these
orders against US am unable to tell only know that
wSsthsr hsa snythins todo with obtaining star the iSs Two
S es
anson and Mr. HSrris But submit thas n respect to the
susalehanna litigation AZ controversy should 6e deemed
cas
those who are but aso M @
s and the real Or y injury @ Likely
them Afforded safeient cause for sxefemeut pas,
al @
s
Us
;Ss'n Ss s1esS sas @
ssa in s o % s % the s ri,
asrf @ hs Is q as ae oaTs NE n was @
the next day Another was granted March r. appon
ms s s
to Ses s ans
Mr. % the 1 @as nc se n
to hs second order. In regard ali three then
ss g n na f the naSe
tsary 6y the Judgment Of the Court Of impeaenmsnt
wr s t Be
$ss @ iSIS
j b s.
Sy The piansiil admitted to rsPrsssntatsa IAN
NJ ssSSEHt dI i,
Junction W0uU expression Oi opinion was
me bsgnnins the end and hc whole Of my sSnnestSn
w ss %any to rs in
ses and rSy S SGss n saS my
this case That principle that every person entsd to
ana whenever there as9ntrcSsrsS about ihS owner
he Or mater
investigated at least m he Court takes further order
s sar 5 es sn'sa
Sis had Sean % Si
had trick 9 get an act of Congress passed
sTise AVOID making any 'SSi asi
United States which was the preence under
s's rsas afs sy fs1ss
holders, Sc much for his rights. NOV, where was the
sss ny S% ss$
h a
n hss SS to sG @S
the and hai might be shown soon as they
these should ri i Know there
be respectable lawyer anywhere in the country who
:ss sssssss s5e%Ess i Il: $
IL ,,s j @ ~
s asr or sf psae IN 5 Se s
merely temporary and until cause to the contrary should
saness me9s M s s end ON inc Of @ Of n nHs
had aswas % ed By GTa0z o sia s
oass
any attempt to remove the cause into the Circuit
ssis ' Va;
II full which s ,
rest The sorporaion foreign Il is property
anS 70 wSna Y, M hs s
iii Reasonable that II udgmeat should Be
ery within this State and that could only be by the
II order r M rs
reason and its usaeaen in these words III being now
!snS : sysde ed ,, jSrsa,sea s ana re & tie
and @ Of The Union Pacic Rsroad @ oSmpany
from the state which intention may be carried into
sss M
gSss aS S III does
So bis % s the small
ssnptuoas Violation Injunction; idSes !his. say,
shares Erie ana tasn went
pare upon complaint without a sadicient oath the
Of m Se 81 G s S %
ose Sf wo ere on II The @ e be
"s @ !sfSt
As and nS
prote estation and argument, an afiirmance OF that
appointment from the General Term which they
much vilify and hold to Here again, ask II
there be respectable awyer anywhere in the country
who will say that 1t unproessional and wicked to
advocate this order but whatever others may think,
think the order right and thinking justified
my advocating II. The last order which am TO
slider is that made the 3Oth March, authorizing the
Receiver to open the vault of the Union Pacific
Company: How ANYBODY. could object to this order
company. had locked the vault and carried the
combination beyond the state. They refused TO
unlock or to give the combination The question
now became this and this onlywhich the stronger
the Court the corporation, Let any citizen Of New
York who would have its Courts obeyed answer What
stance do think Judge Nelson would have done II he
had appointed receiver OF properly locked in safe and
the defendant had run away with the key? Would he
have suffered his order to be concmncd And what do
you suppose he would ii the counsel who moved be-
him TOR an order to the safe had been assacd
and denounced for moving him TO grant it2 But will not
by discussing this matter urther aud
myself with adding that in the Court of impeach-
men II understood the report two of the Judges being
also Judges OF the Court Of AppealsJndges Church and
Feckham-were OF opinion that Judge Barnard right
IN making this order Most of YOU will with me
that what these Judges thought right counsel could not
~ muy iou IN now