National opinion. [volume] (Bradford, Vt.) 1865-1874, 1872-01-19
orange county court.

gwen 10 li' jury ABOUT IL oclock'
The argument by the counsel al
ready named, and the charge Of The
court occupied more than days
time. The jury were dismissed on
Friday not having agreed.
No. %. Joseph Atkinson V. Rich
ard Patterson. Action, trcspass
upon the freehold. 1t was claimed
by plf, that def. had cut wood and
timber and committed other tres
passes on his land. Lot No. l73 in
Newbury tho defense was that deit
owned the land; the whole trial
turned upon the question little
and both sides went back the
original charter of the town by the
Governors Of New Hampshire and
New York. The pin, evidently had
everything his own way till the
close of the trial when the Judge or.
dered verdict for the deft., to the
surprise ofcvcrybody, 1t is under.
stood however that this was done 80
that all questions might be properly
raised in Supreme court.
Leslie & Rogers for plfi. Gam.
bell ond Clarke for def. The case
lasted till
Saturday, Jan. 9th.
No. Ga. Cyrus Joslyn VS.. J, Q. A.
Bass.
After the jury were cnpannclled
in this suit the deft. set the case
"Not for Jury" and it was contin.
ued at his expense.
Monday, Jan. Sth,
No. lis, Avery l.. Flint, apt, vs..
Roswell G. Curtis. Action of as.
sumpsit on contract made by def,
to pay pli. certain sum of money
if he would Get back the house he
was about to build, SO as not to Oh.
struct deft's view. pltf. fulfilled his
part of the contract by setting his
house back,
McWain and Durant for PHI. Per
rim, Blaisdell and Rowell for def.
Verdict for plf. s20.i7 and costs.
No. 1872. II. II. Chandler VS.. 10.
seph Corevo, apt. Action Of as
sumpsit to settle accounts between
the parties. Boyden and Gambell
for ptf. Perrin and RoweIl for def.
Given to the jury at night
Tuesday, Jan. 0.
No. 1872. Verdict for plll. to rccov.
ar IS 90 and costs.
Court business was then taken
up and the remainder of the week
was occupied in disposing of the
iocket. The list Of divorces granted
will be found appended to this re
oort, below. We give few Of the
more important Court cases in the
rider of the docket.
No. 5, Horace |. Johnson VS.. -.
Z. Sargent. This suit has been
pce tried and is rcmanded from the
supreme Coult for a new trial
t involves the title or boundary to
ONE not very valuable wild land on
he mountain in Orange. Contin.
ed on account of the sickness of
he def.
Stephen Ii. Mann VS.. Town of
'airlee. This is the case that was g
red by jury the first week of the 7
,rm. The defendant made a mo-
on to set aside the verdict for the
Jason that there were but eleven '
lrors in the box when the case
as tried. 1t appears that Will
am b, kimball was really the ju,
II from West Fairlee, but William "
.imbalI was summoned and served
his place.
Motion overruled and exceptions
ken.
No. 90. Geo. L. Brown VS.. Chas.
ogers, and Nos. 80 and 50, between
lie same parties but in different or. !,
.r, are discontinued without costs. d
No, AZ. Harry b. Stevens vs.. ID. o
Pillsbury, ct. ais, This is an ac- T.
On of cjectment brought by plff. i
obtain possession Of the old Bliss u
lvern Stand in Bradford, together il
It'll four other buildings now cree a
d on the premises, on the ground :,
at condition i'm a deed given by q,
ISIS to the plif. had been broken ty N
grocery having been kept on the a
emlSes and because one of the ~
lants had kept boarders. -
The plf. moved for a contin uance fo
the purpose of bringing a bill in er
ancery. Motion allowed on terms.
No. Al and 40. George Darling
VIM. Arnold apt. Judgement III
plf on report. a'
No. A.. Sewall Godfrey vs., Dan. st
w Cox on+ ,ot;o, Of -. ia