New-York tribune., 1871-09-26
A COMPLICATED LOUISIANA DIVORCE CASE

A motion was made yesterday in the Su-
preme Court Chambers before Judge Barnard 70 con-
tinue the Injunction granted July IL, 1871 restraining
VIM. H. Hunt defendant herein, who 10 also plantn IN
divorce suit against Sarah G. Hunt. plaintiff herein.
this State pending this proceeding The parties belong
in Louisiana, where the divorce suit was originally
s%ccess in his favor The motion
made by the plaintiff herein who alleges tnst IN ,Se bsr
ter nd part or h her h0Gs ny III
house and go abroad With view OF tSs oo'AH nountry
n SvG5s sSs bse t% tSs as that Iss
soften his feelings toward her that while she was 40
the propriety Of her submitting TO divorce without
driving him to the necessity OF public tra tnss pro
Ioussns in which action she refused 70 appear or to
acknowledge the Of the court ana Sat
since then he has made contract OF marriage WITH an
other woman with whom he has since Lived at the New
oSaneS Gas Invalid and hi. with the other
woman mentioned is adnltero9s u tho. .,a ,,.,rt,r
ever since the date of their marriage exhibited III tenn;
and ana Ss sys Fl
ment charged against him consisted In his leaving tne
when she 70 70, 'eS sn M ee bsn y
consequence Of such proposal that the SUIT tsef wss
% s strictly %s Msy 90 Jaw
and such marriage IL on record there tnat Paintn I'm
seay scen for
wife and children. II was o0ntended on Dena OF the
present divorce laws Of louisiana and that
the divorce being for cause not recognized az sucent
by the preexistng laws, was Invalid. Case sui oh
POLICY-DEALERs AS PUBLIC PROSECUTORS.
Soon after the recent raid on policy dealers
in this city full account OF the which led to the
action Of the police published In THE TRIBUNE. 1t
then stated that only those dealers who had dened
the authority of Simmons Co., the owners OF the Ala
bama Kentucky and Missouri Lotteries were held for
trial Frederick Luhy had persisteny refused to obey
the orders emanatng from No. 212 Bowery the mead
4rst victim. When he was misd. the simmons Brothers
appeared in Court prosecutors but the Jury returned
da ssbsr s
but the case wss put on from time 70 hsms Ie,
the absence Of three material witnesses for the defense
These zachariah Chester and William simmons the
send their rebeous subordinate to prison In order to
frrhtrn Others into compliance with tnelr wishes i tae
M of having increased share OF their em0lunens
H % %
the policy business in THE TRIBUNE three months ago.
He doing business. however as an agent for sn,-
ees1 S1 pSa wanted s
Sa the o
their v.1Tsss Ss' the p'YSyaSs YSyrTs Police
Chester and William simmons were accordingly held IN
Grand . jury The three witnesses above named
by the defendant but paid no attention to the
was found that they had left the city They appeared IN
Court Yesterday bench warrants, but the case was
adjourned owing the sickness Of Of the defendants
counsel The case was adjourned to the second MONDAY
of the next OF the Court Of General Sessions, the
agreement being that the defendant would accept trial
on that day with without his counsel or witnesses
COL Fellows Assistant DistrctAttorney, said that. no
matter TO what date the had been deferred he IN
tended present at the trial even Lie had retired
into private fife aud ta,en up his residence In distant
State of the UnOn he would return and appear for the
people IN the case. much he interested In the mys
terry with which the defendants counsel had surrounded
the matter.