The Opelousas courier. [volume] (Opelousas, La.) 1852-1910, 1871-06-24
Decisions of the Supreme Cour t
OpeSQusns, >BHne Term, l67l.

No. 69l. Ron,a:n Yerduai VS.. w. NJ. Smith, E. T.,
ct al.-Contiuued.
-753 V. s. Martin Admir-. vs.. Sidney and West
ley Singleton.-Judgment Of lower Court afir NJ
ISL In the matter of the opposition of Ahat
ct ais. to the ho1nologation to the tableau of TIE
Estate Of Ed. Simon Sr.-Judgment Of lower
Court dismissing opposition avoided and reyer-
sed, and judgment amending the tableau in snch
manner as to give preference to the judicial
mortgage Of the opponent over the claim of TO-
bit, Charpenticr & Co., and that i'll other res
poets tho Judgment be affirmed; cest Of appeal
to DC paid by appellees.
r., 76l. Frank Perret VS.. j. Backman Lee.-Judg-
mcnt of lower Court affirmed. #.
74l. Zenon Broussard Us. Jos. Breaux.-Judg-
mcnt appealed from reversed, and Judgment for
defendant.
$50. Mary z. Knight VS.. f. B. Mentz, Sheriff,
ct als.-Judgment :lhirned. : II
74a. Farmena Nash, Adm'x. rs. Thos. r. Mag
gah.--Judgment appealed from avoided and Re-
nizing and rendering executory the Judicial
mortgage set forth in her petition against tho
lands therein described. that said lands be seized
and sold to satisfy said mortgage debt with in
forest as therein provided. =. =.
746. Martini Sorrel vs. Denis Carlin ct als.-
Judgment of District Court annulled, avoided
and reversed, aud judgment rendered In favor
Of defendants. -
759. Felscien Guillory VS.. Marianne III. Gull
Tory. Judgment of District Court aanuIled.
avoided and reversed, and jud gn1ent In favor Of
defendant !. ~r5-.,rx - :.
762 Mrs. III. ii. Mcdonald ct ais. vs. J. M
Thompson, Sheriff, ct al-Julgment of District
Court affirmed, vita costs of appeal. ~ -
76s. N. Wells VS.. T. G. Coupton.-Judgmen
affirmed. -, =
753. Succession Sosthene Mouton.-Judgment
affirmed. ."
757. Alex. Frcre. tutor, vs.. VIM. Robcrtsbn
test. ex.-Jndg gniept appealed 'fr0m affrnetl rs
to tho plaintiff, and a. to the interycnor Hrs
Ann Ii. Smith be annulled and avoided, and us
to her the rule be made absolute ct the defend
ants costs, =. - ~. ~
763. Chas. Thompson VS.. C. Comeau, admfi ct
af-Judgment appalled, from awarded by resefy-
ing the rights Of the creditors of Jacob AnsA1nl
if any there be to oppose the privilege Of phln-
tiff in the settcn,ent Of the suecession that 40
thus amended tue Judgment be affirmed. >
7eo. J. w. Bnrbri idge & Co. VS.. Jno. J. Andrus
Judgment affirmed. ..... ..,ss.>. So
7a.. j. G.. Parkcrson vs. j. n. Grundy.-Re-
hearing refused. ~: - :
742. VIM Murhead vs.. Francis e. Pquette.-
Judgment appeale1 from aflrmed with costs :.
III. Frederick Iaas vs. Dnnis Cariine.-Judg
meg,t Of Dist. Court anfuiiesi and reversed, and
ordered that plaintiff recover from defendant
sls5 SO, defendant pnying costs in lower Court,
and plaintiff paying cost Of appeal. %a
745. Opposition In Estate Of Gsspard Kebleur.
Appeal dismissed ut cost OF appeal. - @
743. r. j. Pavy to. Elizabeth Escoubas; aianx.
Judgment Of Dist. Court. annnlled Judgment
paying eosts In bosh Courts, .4g -
7l3. v. A., Fournot, ys. r. Beer.--.Judgn4|ent
heretofore rendered remai,, undisturbed- ia
| 7A4 jean Carriere W. Augustin Iahau, ethls.
1T is ordered that the judgpaent applied for %
far q 4 disnisses the writ ef seansstratlon End