Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1871-10-24
LAW REPORT.
First Chancery Court-MOrgan, Chan

First Chancery Court-MOrgan, Chan.
The following decisions were rendered yes
terday: Copruro VS. Bevsdorf, injunction dis-
solved Mhltmore vs. stoner, demurrer over
as. Meath vs. Smith; 454, Sesy VS. Street
SO, COsten vs. street; 457, Boyd VS. Street; e95,
PalifenO VS. Williams; SAC, Bassett VS. Lewis;
6l7, Perrin VS. Thornton: SIS, Burke VS. Ford
ESQ, Horton VS. H~awthoIne; 65l, Planters
Bank Of Tennessee VS. DeLoach 652, Wright
VS. DeLoRch; 654, Grant VS. S~annoner; 657,
ogelsby VS. Caruthers; $50. Ssffsrans VS.
Winters; $50, Maier VS. Park; 66l, Owings VS.
Chenoweth; 662. McCombs vs. Harrison; 66j,
Richards VS. NEWELL G6; Kunsheedt VS.
Wells; co., Emo VS. Wells; 66S, Thompson VS.
Wells; 659, Benedict VS. Wells; $40, Shaw VS.
Wells; 67l, Longstreet vs. Wells; 6S, Foote VS.
Wells; Oi3, DeBoach VS. Craig; 674. Boyd VS.
Montgomery; 6I5, Johnson VS. Morse; 676,
Thomas VS. fentoni 6I7, Leftwich VS. Bren-
nan 65S, Pickett VS. Wetmore; 6Sl, order
VS. Laird; 6S2, Rocco vs. Griffin: 6sS. Porter va
Griffin; ga, Wood VS. Bond; 6S5, McDougsl VS.
Memphis Insurance Company; 6S7, Watson
vs. Apperson; 6sS, Apperson VS. Watson; $50,
DuvRn VS. Algeo; $50. Steele VS. Steele; 69L,
Faint VS. Dougherty; 692, Hunt vs. Walker;
@3, Cockrehan vs. Dow6it; 69i, Pickett vs
vs. Theme; 69s, Quimby VS. Knapp; $50, May
VS. TufJ; zoo, Street VS. Atkinson; 702. Beh-
rends VS. Schultz; 7G, Pickett VS. Common 706,
Fraiude VS. Furlongi 50s, Etchevaine VS. Etche-
Yaine.
SeeOnd ChRneery COurt-ChaneeIlOr
Scott.
On yesterdays calendar Nos. So 90, "a, 100
5Q2, 205, 206, 2O7 and 30 were continued. No,
81, submitted. Deere es in Nos 81 and AS and
Nos. 90. 50, 50. 50, o., 95, I'll, 90 and 27 were
passed 10 another day. To-day is motion
day.
second Circuit CO~urt-IEalsey, Judge.
To day, after the disposition of the case of
Hammerskold against Williams ct al is dis
posed OF, the following cases viii be called:
- he ~ a a 4 nEn nna % -a
Taylor, Cole q Mcleod; $50, Rhodes VS. Jack
son Insurance Companyi SO. Caldwell VS.
Brown, administrator sO2, HOLSTER VS. Fla
herty; 53l, Williams vs. Jones; 4f0. Smith VS.
Rellman; 45S, Irwin vs. Sells; 454, Lea VS.
Pickett, Wormley q Co; 456, Cummings, adj
MI VS. Mallory 40; Woods VS. Brown; 45o,
Marsh & Co. vs. Hubbard a 90; 473, Hail VS.
Anderson, ct al; f76, Fond VS. Brinkley; AZ,
IS, Schoonover, admx. VS. Hayden; 479, Hunt
& Schenck VS. Berlin; $50, Majors VS. Levy ,et al;
4Si, Welch VS. Blair, Pierce q Co; 4S5, Lincoln
rs naVIei ass, Smith VS. GreeDlaw; 4S9, Hart
q Co VS. Montana; $50, Carson VS. Archer ct al;
49l, Btckford VS. German; asa, Levi vs. Meath;
4s6, Watson, trustee, vs. Delsp ct al, go, Risk
VS. s~igntaeo; sol, Hesse, Rdmr VS. Wayne;
502, rark VS. Williams; sos, Herwig VS.
suffer; sos, Malone VS. Aldridge; sos, WiIIls
vs. Carley; sos, Shore e~xecptrix, VS. Morgan q
e~xecutrix, VS. Sawyer; 2OO0, Smith VS. Garrett
a Specht; 2s2l, Seessel & Son VS. Kalsski; 2g7S, |
Thornton vs. johnson, O'Donnen & Ryder;
SO35, Frank & Co VS. Allen; SOS6, Frank VS. All |
len; 2s0I, McKinevay vs. PickArd.
Circuit C0Hrt-HefskeIl, Judge.
The examination of witnesses for the plain
III in the gas case Is still going on. The /
court discharged the regular jurors yester-
day, and ordered the sherin 10 summon q
umcient number of good and lawful men TO
appear, after the case now on trial Is dis
posed Of. and serve in their stead. Hereafter
regular jurors in this court will be relieved
rom duty after they shall have served one
month and ahair OlaaaQ dllad Inv Ofharn 1