New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-05-19
THE FOSTER TRIAL.

FOURTH DAr-TW0 MORE JURORS OBTkrNpn
ONE JUROR STILL wANTED-THE EXTRA
PANEL EXHAUSTED AND ANOTHER pANpI
OF TWO HUNDRED ORDERED.
The work of impanelng a Jury for the trio,
Of Foster progressed slowly yesterday only two Adj.
tional jurors being obtained making IN all There
was not very large crowd In attendance for 9TH each
juror rejected one ticket OF admission a cancead
About 20 jurors called majority not being pr.
eDt. The extra panel OF 800 jurors exhausted Al,
O'clock and the OF those who failed 10 answe,
on the first call called again, when II as founa
that many were in attendance. These were eran,nsd
but were all rejected except George K Chase who Wa
tho eleventh juror. Another panel OF 100 wa.
therefore ordered returnable at i0l 8. IN. to-day.
Judge CarlozO District-Attorney GarYn, his AssIst
ant Col Fellows and the counsel for the dofenss were
promptly hand, yesterday After the roll Of Juror,
already impaneled had been called, the drawing of
names was resumed at 1892.
William II. Palmer the first man called but hc had
formed an opinion and rejected; and 80, fof tho
same reason, were Mnard NJ. Smith, Samuel Levy. and
| Charles Langcnback
| THE TENTH JUROR oBTAISgD
Francis j. Hotop Of No "a whte-st was tie next On.
called. On the preliminary qestons he stated that Ia
had formed opinion, and Judge Stuart pursuing hi,
examination under the challenge for principal csuss
| elected The following testimony:
o DID you read about the dea'h Of M Paiunmi noticed q.
Q Beside st hsve read ahhsi Nothing creep, III. ,a.
| NNNN''N@
Q Have hs,ri other PEOPLE SPEAK occurrence and m cir
occurred on the Brodgy and that Eh an s hook
% the eobiact he character Of the Poster so sld "s
the klDgi A. Nothing; said BY person. star ing IN Inc .
while was dtuHg and general thai It "a. rrry
O Otherwise characterized except BY the xOri so, w,s
| called anything el'el a; | heard nothing es.
ohavng gwen bowi Nothing more ID, nslss Va, neSSa
which had not noticed in reading the account
q Did y0a know these gentlemen who oonyerngi I u
| n
have he'rl That such deed lad been COMMITTED bot any
@ Well from that conversation, Sir you derive .ny opnca a..
the qg o fs1ne,' OF fairness Of 5e occurrence which persO.
O Tat Tutaaa Lei rba. Putnam va. hllei By ma,
Q And s. the killing cruel one A did ,es.p.
. @ sepns 70 or ,r ea ga s Ns Tp's % p I. .
to1ei what heard had presos-ao opinion on u.
Did ygsi MAKE 'y response :; - to 4o.. eoe,'s ,e.
about II dii no. make aay remark.
2 D! yoa re-, anhns the matter ot9evs than
pages Of newspapers A. No Sir except one
g Dt og 6sLeys It g ,q5's c mate %1tE' Did JD p'a'
O. Aside iom that view Of it, d adopt the fas presented yo
@ fPaisan va, killed the manner yu h,,. learned fro.
The newspapers and the conversation, Of 9th AID Foster d u.
orhoa or net .. 70 The quality anI err Of tie at q be p,ou
Fostcr A. The and cuH have been toned
an MON upoS IT, tie mere eel Of man taking another ones If
certainly would convey he mPol upon ue that bad committed
@ s5o5y for the gS.Sa sPd yoS, .a.s, tn:
Tsa % yea r. e 10 S va, eSSe Sssss ' a..
You predicate 9On wins. you have heard lud re
heard correct and full accoun Of ihe matter te
help but bear in general Way avoid reading about al
occurrences becaue they leave dsaeabe .ila me-
you understand that Killing PEI 90 implies murder neocea
f. District Attorney Garvn-ve consideration, srup as.n,
finding verdict gsy N sa s aes @ s 10 tSe r.,,
against tie prisoner regard 70 the question OF us s' OF h0'
After another question the defense the Challenges
were withdrawn, and Mr. Hotop was s"orn as the en'n
The following had formed opinions and we're rejected
Herman II. Blankmeier WIN X Bell joseph a. goss'
Tnwer BENJAMIN r. Schoonmacher. William J. Cooh'
rane Norman L. Nver, Ferdinand d. H9pklns' Tharies
W Shortridee Simon Mack Alexander Menzles, Thomas
Martha Alfred Beach, Edward L. Currier, Theodore A.
Cronse found competent by the ters put ehIltehsed
RcshaIp t;eore 81 Rich, john NJ. Underil, samuel h.
Rosenthal VIM. Ward Morris Ktznlger SS9mon p nIn
TobIer Johp Y, Uendrickson, Henry Mannholz, Henry
g. Carr John j. Canlon Charles r. Persuhn, Ihonss j.
ABRAHAM Biauyeit OF No. rs vandan-st. was found
competent by the triers, but was set aside on porenP
tory challenge from the District-AttOrney. . =.
At the clerk announced that the entire panel ha
been called and replaced the names OF hoe VINO sa hos
answered, and was about to recall tnem Wnen eAJsass
Stuart objected its being done without an order OF he
Court Garyin s @ IN stq at
would be perfectly competent TO can them sgan jugs
Judge Cardozo satisfied on the point although no
he speaker) not perfectly clear on IT, Judge car
said if objection was made he would orier nhs
they DO again called And as there was none, Mr. Van
dcvoOr recalled those not answered TO on the INST Gs
After 80 names had been called Alexander H. Horton
answered, but he had formed an OPINION ana was 10
jected. .,,, .,..,,,,,r
George K Chase OF No. $40 West Nineteenthst. was
then called and examined. and in response to judge
SuaTs inquiries said he had read the papers had heard
people speak the subject, and had spoken OF u MN
self would not say that he had formed any definite
@ al ~ an, 80 snLiect Ia eon,eouepes Of VIM
yoa read aud beard A No % not knO" have definite
o. Bot have 700 on S belief as to killing incidents and
caIsances TO the par who did and as TO Tue extent ." DIS gun
innocence in that respect A No. 81"
You said e. moments ago yOu had formed indefinite o'-
ion A. opinion that Dir Patlsm ha been Killed. ,A -
charged reference EG6g him No. SIR have no oeoS NJ
@ lou about the ma'teri les SH VA" ~
ra' %e lt1 the Ss means b. which he killed i Y Sir
q Did yoa believe the means 10 '
ne to b. which tie death was PFoiocei IL"
r9ePl er as 70 mat ~, aha, we're II, means employed, ah
il was stated that be Killed b. aooE or rather was injured ~
carhOok and snerwari died
Vas ii sad that the wounds inflicted By Fo'cr' 4
o M Won take that for granted uncontra by anything e'
o. p YOU believe it WAS rne fasi A 1t night be r and
What did YOU suppose abOu, its truth or falavl sap
roSed man had Injured; coaa's exactly say hor
b S you a nssa w dose b. yoarse far h'
apy ON the snhecti A. don't think they I'D
D. Do you remember what they were A. fe. ~, 49,, - %.
9 Do remember What respect you differed from ''s ~
dilersd A. Yes, Sir - u, -. ...,.a,t A I
O. 10 reference TO the guilt or innocence {" '1e ~
O. Do YOU think you expressed your mind in any way any ~
A. No. Sir - H. v., Va,
Hs auth NJ change mini anl ne 49,,
t4rareIl T. don't has have not iai ''l"s ~
amounted a
o. You had a mind A. hal an impression a.. . ,,rns,,v
the BUSHES present.
PROPRIETOR of the Stevens have coDsn Gus
kning verdict II guilty. where the puBis IS ,an
Judge CardozO Overruled the challenge lOr Piiiaaed
canse and on the challenge for favor the Juror 'oS'
a. follows: . IN h,v. h.., leo TIA.
O. From The opinions expressed by others coal H-'e
an impression or your mn1i A. | think II could
o. What A. Ny idea different rom a, ~ van 10
q The Couit-Judge Stuart means, what 90 !oa 'u mrs.
no. term impression, what 90 you term " IA ''-
sumo would be impression ,. c,,, The onesio1 n
O. BY judge start Then you bed an ippfesg' nj or rslI A.