The New York herald., 1871-11-29
ENGLAND.

Witnesses Recognize tho ClNlmant-Testi.
no.y Of Catholic Priest-Whas He Has
70 Say About Tichborne's Educatien-Pic-
turcs Produced. ~
~ 4Tl4 LONDON. Nov. 49, 1871.
] enclose you very complete resume Of the
proceedings IN the Court yesterday or the ITCH
borne case: y is taken nom !as London telegraph
q this morning. -
This case was resumed yesterday, the Court pre-
sng } which mas bscSe lts n0rnsl Sppsar
q henry Noble o Tichborne. who Is now -is.
se4rR old, and was dalrymaid there in ls4o, during
When she saw tho claimant at the Swan. at Aires.
IN s sns y mis-
she again saw the CLAIMANT and, having coivefsed
with him, became convinced most assuredly OF his
animation TO indicate that the witness had
boon prepared By previous :onvegsa,i0ns
'' ior recognising IS MIN ANY any ono SHOWN TO
her; but IN generally simple manner, Just tingcd
assertion denying emphatlcally tnat sne ever told
any one that she did not recognize the claimant.
.ext appeared TO state That no had seen Inc claim.
Ant ~ the period tnat his wifo spoke 70 several
By every feature ana gesture, by gait and voice. OK
cept that he was much sloutcr and his broken Eng.
s a mat Vines aK Observed ro
yns witness being slightly deaf, the peculiar In
oa o
eessxrty somewhat lnenectual. lie admitted having
mt before he saw hlm. TWO photographs rep
Sescnting the claimant IN his comparative youth and
sne o.hcr as ne L. now were shown TO ane witness.
0nc ne knew, the latter ne SAID was ike Roger
ncnDorne; third. which was taken in Chilc ne
Ir. MeyrcK. priest OF the Catholic church. Bristol,
VINO graduated at Oxford in 1888, and took first
and Mrs. James Iichborne, In Paris. when he saw
vOung Roger Tlchborne as Guild dressed 10 blue
saW the Tichbornes afterwards in Rome Witness
went to St0ncyhurst In lSA7 where young T1chborne
Was then ana was panel a. me Stste Of his educs
Witness was as sure TcnSorne could not have con: CON:
strued Greek or translated line OF Latinnot even
srosse xamination Of the claimant. and consequently
VA Sisaiiowsd By inc jusseM.Ss witness neSasivcd neg
sAe probability OF Tcnborne's being ACQUAINTED
@ Soa1 a TSns 0 n dasdlanss ss at
pt0ncyhurst, which the claimant could not remem.
ns S ~ o III. ns
10 verify, and. as It wore, to account for apparent
Inaccuracies IN tho evidence In reference to stoney.
and LOCALITIES: having seen the claimant on Monday
and Tuesday last, the witness had tested him by
SsSsSn whom he @ mad Kn.wu % in carly ca wy youth M
and at Stoneyhursr. The witness frankly ad-
mitted that, nom books and otherwise, informa-
uon about Stoncyhnrst was easily attainabe. The
witness stated that he had been private tutor OF
oxford, which lea to an association between them.
mo crosse animation OF the witness was very pro-
To q
sne witness sald, reminded him generally Of MIN
vnen boy; there was something 81 his mother In
claimant had at times that expression now. The
modern portrait, too, had some points OF resem
GLANCE TO the young man he knew in lS49. No test
oe the claimants knowledge OF Greek or Latin was
nasle personally oy !ne witness. tseveral times The
witness told by the Chief Justice that he almost
systematically avoided giving direct answers TO
An elderly woman named Eleanor Smith, Of Aires.
ford, whose husband was ban TO Sir Henry itch.
borne, spoke OF knowing The family, and especially
~, A,fTcd ana o. the cia'mans coming g ner place
Immediately rs Roger Tichhorne talked TO him, and
hal now NOS the ieas. doubt about u. Exercising
cr0ss-examnaiion, got much amusement out Of his
colloluy with the witness who al last said patheca.
~ thatshc made very nervous. The witness stuck
% her TEXT nat eho know The claimant once, not.
witnstandiny his change rom very thin 70 a very
and the T,chbormc family. while the claimant said
that he should have known ner anywhere. Among
was was shown IT, Altogether, despite Of any nervous:
nancp witness. A MIR. James Howieston, who had
been In the employment OF Mr.. Hopkins, IN Poole IN
FOR the borough, reIlring frou tho representation,
and deputauon gong 70 Upton, where Mr. 4. y.
o was a nayas seen NM on T 1uesdaS was
convinced that he was the same person. The claim.
ant spoke 10 him OF Mr. Hopkins ana his sons, par
flcularly one with curly black hair.
In an Interval Of The proceedings sergeant Ballan-
cine stated that he had underrated the number OF
witnesses he mad to call, and therefore ho could
form no idea as TO when the p,alnLlI's case would
Do concluded The Judge suggested that the Court
anOud sat on Friday instead OF adjourning 10 Mon
0ay as mad been arranged, but the counsel on both
sidcs seeming 10 desire TO adhere to the arrange
ment Il stood. -
The picture Of Lady T1cnbornc, which had been
spoken Of BY Colonel Lnsh.ngtoa as b. being Ing rec1g $
noher was hero produced ~ Court ana sppear,ea ,
BRINE OF her age, richly draped, OF handsome
fsasnres and nne figure win proiSsion aSs fsco Q.
but It rs diiicut to Say that any resemblance
:cold oe traced 70 the Claimant .on OF 70, .,
Gay. After this tho cr05aexaminauOn OF
aowleston was resumed, and IL was sought 70
mamagc ns account OF tho deputatlon which went
nom Poole 70 upton-a suggestion being, as IL were,
Melnuated that went to Mr.. Henry Seymour, theil
one OF me members for Poole, and not 10 Mr.. T1cn
Tnen comc John Cooper, OF Alresford, master
lg1eklayeS who spoke OF knowina many Of the
= enanns and