Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1871-02-01

VIRGINIA, to with the County Court OF
v Fairfax county, January Rules 1871 John
Grover vs. William H. Davis: In case.
Mem: The object Of this suit is to recover Of
the said defendant the sum Of Sl26 75 with inter-
est thereon from the lst Of April 1870, and to at
taeh the personal property of the defendant to
pay the same.
It appearing by affidavit filed that the said de-
PENDANT is nonresident of this State it is order
cd that he appear here within one month after
due publication hereof and do what is necessary
to protect his "fSFf s. Rc iRGPyk fssts Clerk
Moore p. q. jan l6-law4w
VIRGINIA, to wit In the County Court of
Y Fairfax county, January Rules, 1911: Ben
jamin Caywood and Aaron S. Caywood, partners
and land agents, under the firm name of Cay
wood & Son, ,complainants, against James T.
Ward John T. Ward. and Samuel Norment,
Mem: The object Of this suit is to recover Of
the defendants, James T. Ward, John T: Ward
and Samuel Norment, the sum of $780, due the
compliments for their commission on the sale of
land amounting to $1,000 sold for and on behalf
Of the said defendants with interest from the 10th
of June, 1863 and to attach in the hands of the
defendant Curtis j. Colbert, any debts that may
be due from him, or TO become iue, to the said
defendants, to pay the same.
1t appearing BY affidavit chat the said defend
ants, James II. Ward, John 7. Ward and Samuel
Norment, are non residents of this State it is or
dered that they appear here within one month
after due publication hereof, and do what is ne
ressary to protect their interests. copy, teste:
F. D. RICHARDSON, Clerk.
Ball, p. q. jan l3-law4w
VIRGINIA, to wit In the County Court Of
Y Fairfax county. January Rules, 1871: A.
bert Patterson VS.. William n. Davis: In ch'y.
Mem: The object OF this suit is to obtain a
judgment against the said defendants for the sun.
Of S3l6 18, with interest thereon from the = day
Of May, 1870, and to attach in the hands Of Rich
T..
ey due or to become due to the defendant; also
the real estate Of the defendant in the county OF
Fairfax, containing about seven thousand FIVE
hundred acres, purchased by said defendant from
.Joseph Thornton, TO pay the same
1t appearing by affidavit filed that the said de-
tendant is non resident Of this State it is order
ed that he appear here within one month after
due publication hereof, and do what is necessary
10 protect '''S + B. Rfc ifRsB $50 Clerk
Thomas, p. q. jan l3-law4w
VIRGINIA to wit: In the County Court OF
Y Fairfax county, January Rules, 1871 Law
son Money VS.. VIM. H. Davis and VIM H. In
gersol In chancery.
Mem: The object Of this suit is TO attach n
tract of land in the county of Fairfax. belonging
to the defendants, containing seven thousand1ive
hundred aeres purchased from % Thornton?
terest from the - day Of April, 1870 until paid.
It appearing by affidavit filed that the defend
ant is not resident of the State of Virginia, it is
ordered that he appear here within one month
after due publication hereof, and do what is ne
cessary to protect his interests. A copy, teste:
F. d. RICHARDSON, Clerk.
1hoInas p. Y. jan l"-4aw0w
A DEMONSTRATORS NOTICE.-The I'M
II dersigned having duly qualified as Admin
istrator on the estate Of SAMUEL HARTLEY.
decd hereby gives notice that he has appointed
George R. Shinn, of the city of Alexandria, Va,
his attorney in fact to settle the business Of the
estate and all persons having claims against the
said estate are notified to present them to thesai
George r. Shinn for settlement, and all persons
who are indebted to the said estate are hereby
notified to make immediate payment to the said
George r. Shinn, at the office of Shinn & Co.,
No. Is Union st. +. d. HARTLEY,
=. O lr,,r Sn1,l Inrtlo,. Aand