New-York tribune., 1871-03-30
s62nOi 8j
r-I,it az rllcSe oueratiouS, in re spect of the II

The result operations in respect Of the net in
-o,me Of ihc Company, Is as follows
t ~ pia % ~ 93 The 5e resn1. & vas $500 80 G o. a.
, reI tie let 26jo79 o. Daring I6e second
yea, s6'd e 100 90 more to te eapa A. ana bs s @ p % e Dto
ser during IeiO they ad!ei about +i"OV" TO The
S1 the result in the dividends and in the market
value of the stock Is shown by TINS c9npai5J3n 1 ,.
The 1mny regularly aid dividend, at the rate Of per cent oS @ us
mon soc regularly aud m'Tei value o. us common %
Sr sq Lane Company Wholly stopped pent q di,
nds ysn lls Ps5e % & s f m me common @ oct to Is per cent
th. at Of lie ting Of ne III ne asvi o. & % IL mon % % m
ags to an cause Of gdneI, eeaS' IN @ 1
~ A. bs would done but for the msmaHagenes and
i,l NJ Evarts IN the course of a long argument con-
% rule equity iv that although generally
,rr b hs eeS waste @Ppion c9oIaie funds By ts
ohcsrs agents Of the ctiPr uo % 30 s,oc ~ he eorstop
& % apges that directors Of the corporation rese TO prose
eI neshssrse Q. slI no.. % s seasrs IN
OF bo In ir,sTe,t wi he Permitted to de bin in their
mailing the corporation party az yer, 1conenient to
bring oil before the Court part may nis OH y" '"'
selves 1na al olns -, and very strong sccoant
.Gn pan ofGouu Ft and Lane foL naSfea, a r.
pirate wrongful os,iniT. o. e & losses
iHsieied 90 corporation BY their msmaIAgenea 1
and other se Of gross ns II ioT1s s s & have .eaurs and
s fol and absolute control Of the soporson
RsSS Papp S q s.si Of their opaoa. dpron and loss Of
winch
Tbrd: clear complete present cGnlo "
b committed the
sl Of y o tie plaintiffs procure tue bringing Of sni y s
Compsuy tse for yedfess the grievances charged h
ent @ ;he present Board Of Directors should upon the Phce
ton shfhoeFs commence and suit OF fins ehaAeer
entire executive power OF me COs
a control suit would e no other than
" hke character the sham and eoiuse SUITS "hoO ae "e
tbe ghesABoes charged. .-,-,-
bill shows clear FOR an injunction restraining
Conpby Could Be. iis Omeen from making any
fbe Of convertible boDGs and foo creating any more s0h of
sacb IurpOses
who the commission Of the breaches OF si
fud Of which relief sought nor tht other per
whom the defendants wOngfay and 10 VOsn
their du trustees Psd transferred portions Of the corporate iunos
sli respect Of Vanderbilt scbsr and the Boston Hartford
bill
the them back from ten sHythint
ey hsys Srongy received simply seems 10 bod f 6ond
mi for wrorEp transferring The COmpanyt
yfopry then above cited relating 70 party who
has eobe1d deysst execnt Whom YET the creditor
defendants
Ial appabe fraudulent trustee for sbstrAne
r the funds and be should setting up that
Sos ei 70 bsng nghno claim snd should therefore
sn That We were cund bring party sueh eobsrste or
eiEe would hardly be claimed that bis position VI Of
paes ienabe II such fact 10 the sOuh Dot
bl all bot render The III demgrrsbe for parties
h>osHh Of
Jr n j. conformity with the sBeE practice of the Court Of Chan
+f n this STATE A1s supposed 10 be applicable the Pora
sSsrt b. iis adoption u the Old practice
Judge Curtis OF Massachusetts replied 10 Mr. Evarts
a ns closed the argument. Decision reserved.
Upon the afdavt Of John Swan, the English agent Of
eath ana kaphae that Gould Fisk and Lsns about