The New York herald., 1871-12-07

Sir Charles, 'tnat DO not protest against royalty
on the ground OF les expense, but that protest
against slLecures whether you;haye royalty or notn
Of the Crown lands and endeavored to prove that
they were not the private property OF the roy a
to The people under any arrangement with the
royal family as TO any amounts to be given Ia
ss IL M s Sa ss
to allowing income to accumuaLe. on this point
ne mad nothing to alter upon what ne had said AZ
the ridiculous cry Of treason which had been
Tor the Char charge i Of having Ing used used discourteo1s
language against the Queen. He had not ac-
He had only qugted from pampnlet called, aWnat
Does she do with IT." In which the Commissioners
Of the Treasury had been accused OF malversation.
he held that he had reason TO complain when,
because he said the statement OF that pam.
phlet needed an answer. ne was accused Of
So So saved snSa %gn. inc
the i be the height cruelty
and unmanliness TO make her Responsible Tor the
acts OF successive Ministers. He went on to say he
the Epeacelul process which was reduc-
ing the functions OF monarchy day by
objection to royalty itself; and he no more blamed
royalty in the ABSTRACT for the retention OF those SIM
for o monarchy in this country was that 1t was
harmless, and that II existed and perhaps saved us
Hn sr 20 q on snSs
must not be discussed. then he maintalned
nothing could be more calculated to bring 1t to an
end than that defence. The morality Of the Court.
he said was never higher than when the Prince
C0nsort WAS its ornament, and mad he lived IT was
ham, where future kings and fuiure legislators by
right Of birth spent their summer days In idly butch
erng s ss Sd & he recognized a also mat nat the ne
Thought there was no security that In the future we
might not have repetition OF the past. In conclu-
ufn I'm ri Inxyn
the idea OF the State less well In the form OF o
kingdom than In that OF republic.
Four Moro Days of the Tichborne Trial
The Snme Old Story-The Plaintiff Recog-
nizsd as the Tichborne OF By rome Days.
te6 aass ieasa LONDON. Nov. 26, 1871.
The hearing Of the Tlchborne case was resumed
the 2lst, the fortyeighth day Of the trial. The
witnesses called were George Tite, now printer
at Newark and formerly in the Carabineers;
Thomas Marks, who remembered Tichborne in the
same regiment; Charles Phillips, warder In the
Kent County Prison, who was once sergeant
beth Inglis, wife OF Robert Ingiis, whose trst
husband was In TlchbOrneS regiment, ana VINO
spoke positively respecting the & claimants iden-
who joined the Carabineers IN 1913; James Morley.
q farmer and maltster at Hinton, VINO nad been
acquainted with the nchborne family from his child
hood; Thomas Parker, corn dealer near Alton;
Robert Bromby an officer OF the Customs at Poole.
vice Of Sir d. Doughty. and VINO knew Roger Tich-
borne before he joined the army.
o the principal witness IN the Tca1orne case on the
at Winchester lie described an interview
which he had with the claimant in March,
latter entered room in winch witness was talking
with Mr.: Holmes. He recognized the plaintiff as
Roger Tichb0rne, whom ne had known In his younger
days. So confident was Mir. Bulpett respecting the
Claimants identity that he directed one o. his clerks
n
witness also gave an interesting account OF con.
versation between the claimant and Mr.. Gosfori, In
which one or the subjects touched upon was the
sealed packet left with the latter by Roger Itch.
borne before leaving England for south America.
the Tichb0rne trial, and further witnesses were
called TO speak to the identity OF the CLAIMANT.
formerly % W in the Service Of Sir Edward Doughty;
the Rev. Robert Pinkney, vicar OF High Cliff,
Onristchurch, who knew Roger Tlchborne IN his
in the royal man steamer Tasmania, who
was serving on board the Oneida when
accompany the Chilean Commission; Mr.. Francis
Longland. who spoke to circumstance in
trahs in 1854; Mr. Henry Crabbe, for t6irty.two
years gardener In the Doughty family; Mrs. Eliza
beth StuSbs who had lived .for many years on
dent Of Upton, who mad known young rlcnborne;
Mrs Charlotte Hoaer for seven years Ms IA the EN-.
white. shepherd on the TicnSorne estate.
the Tich6orno case e, was again resumed yester;;
town. were called to speak to the claimants iden.
tlty. The evloence OF tine aforementioned witness
contained Ia ms anidavif, and upon the Judge put
ting some questions during the Attorney Generals
TO the queries being simultaneously directed
TO the man from both the bar and the belcn. The
Chief Justice protested against the interference OF
the learned counsel, who expressed o hope that
his lordsnip woulu not make any remarks until the
end OF the case. Sir w. BOvill replied that he
should make what observations ne pleased, and
told Sergeant Ballanilne THAT he could say
what he liked when 1t came to his turn
wards explained that an innocent man had
once been sentenced by him TO ten years. penal
servlude upon the testimony OF the police, and he
cident which showed tnat policeman had stated
In evidence the direct contrary OF what he mad
sworn In his anidavlt. Mr.. Baigent, whose name
has been 80 often mentioned 10 the course Of the
trial, was the next Witness, and his narrative Will
be found OF deeply interesting character