New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1871-08-06
BY JUSTICE wYLY.

\ =
curator, T. NJ. Daniel, intervenor; ordered
| that the Judgment of the lower court bt
annulled, avoided and reversed; ordered
| that the plaintiff g demand be rejected; fur
| Their ordered, that the intervention be dis
| missed. Justice Taliaferro and Howell
dissenting.
F. C. Peck ct al. vs.. C. N. ellis and hus
band; Judgment affirmed.
James A. Simpson vs.. j. j. Hope, sheriff
ct al; ordered that the judgment of the
lower court be annulled, and that the case
be remanded, with instructions that the
plaintiff be permitted to introduce proof OF
his plea that he was not cited, and was not
a party to the judgment rendered against
him.
M. M. Calderwood w. William Calder
wood. Rehearing refused.
By JUSTICE HOWE.
B. G. g. S. r. Stewart VS.. Looney g.
Wells; Judgment affirmed Justices WHY
and Taliaferro dissenting.
B. G. 81 s. r. Stewart vs.. Samuel Levy;
judgment affirmed. Justices Taliaferro and
WHY dissenting.
State of Louisiana ex rel. w. w. Farmer,
District Attorney, VS. j. l.. Hunsicker ct al.
and J. b. Garrettson ct al. VS.. III. Filhiol ct
at; these are the cases relative to our CITY
government; appeals dismissed; the Offices in
contest not exceeding in value the sum of
$500, this court has nd Jurisdiction.
State of Louisiana VS.. Martin Tally; iudg-
ment affirmed.
M. P. G. Allen, executor, vs.. NJ. S. Cutliff
and husband; Judgment affirmed
The following DEGREES were rendered on
Saturday, the twenty ninth instant: r.
BY CHIEF JUSTICE LgDELING.
Heirs of Brown VS.. E. g. B. Jacobs; judg.
ment affirmed.
Georgelina Hastings VS.. Rebeeca Brant-
ley, exeeutrix, ct al; judgment affirmed.
5. d. Arick VS.. Walsh & Boisseau ct al:
ordered that the Judgment of the lower
in favor of plaintiffs, perpetuating the in
junction and recognizing his superior rights
on the proceeds of the property sold under
execution OF the defendants, to the extent
of his rents.
BY JUSTICE TALIAFERRo. =
c. T: Dunn VS.. John Calderwood, judg-
ment affirmed.
Wells 81 Jones ct al. VS.. Caldwell e. Cox
ct al; ordered that the Judgment of the
district court be annulled, avoided and
reversed; further ordered that the bounda-
rles between the ten acre lots, numbered
80, 80 and "a, be established as ascertained
by the lines run, marked and designated by
William K. Devoe, City Surveyor of Shreve-
port, and displayed and expressed in his
map of survey and report ACCOMPANY wing
the same, and which are fled as evidence
in this case.
BY JUSTICE HOWELL.
Stewart & Theus VS.. NJ. A. Walsh, Sheriff
ct al; judgment affirmed f
John Nj. Evans VS.. C. M. Peques, curator,
ct al; ordered that the judgment appealed
from be reversed and that the plaintiff re-
cover from c. NJ Peques, curator of the sue
:ession OF j. Daniels, deceased, the sum of
sll.792 Is, with eight per cent interest from
the fifth day of April 1862, till paid. less
credit of S26S8, paid April 4, 1867; to be
paid in due course of administration.
son Monday, July 81, the following deei-
'ions were rendered:
BY CHIEF JUSTICE LUDELNe.
Walker & Vaught vs. G. w. Kimbrongh,
administrator, Z. B. Sadler. intervener. ct
H.; ordered that the judgment of the lower
court be annulled, avoided and reversed:
md that there be INDIGNANT iii favor of the !
plaintiffs for the sum of S7227 10, with five
Der cent interest to be paid in dine course of
administration. Justices Howell and Howe
State of Louisiana ex rel VS.. j. B. Gil |
more ct al; this is the Shreveport contest
or office ordered that the judgment of the |
ourt a quo be reversed, and, that the case |
'e remanded, to be proceeded with accord |
ng to law.
BY JUSTICE TALL1AFERRo.
j. III. Mitchell, dative testamentary exec |
tor VS.. Abraham Levy; ordered that the |
alignment of the district court be avoided, |
nnulled and reversed further ordered |
hat the sequestration taken out by plaintiff |
e set aside, and that the defendant be /
uieted in his title and possession of the |
ract of land purchased by him at the pro- |
ate sale of the succession of John Lilies, |
eceased. Chief Justice Ludeling and JUS
ice Howe dissenting.
BY JUSTICE HOWELL.
s. A. Bell VS.. Francke a. Daneel: same
s. ID. Douglas, sheriff, ct ais; ordered that |
much of the Judgment in the case of S..
!. Bell VS.. D. 3. Douglas, rendered May |
l, 1911, as perpetuated; the Injunction
erein OF the judgment of B. Silbernagel& g.
%. be reversed, and that said Injunction
e set ASIDE, with twenty per cent damages /
n the amount enjoined, in favor of B. Sill I
ernagel & Co., and that in other resnects
aid judgment and the one of same date in
avor of Francke & Daneel be affirmed.
c. Yale, Jr., & Co. VS.. j. H. Howard: or
cred that the judgment appealed from be
eyersed. and that plaintiffs recover of de.
sndants the sum of SI960, with legal inter
st from judicial demand. Chief Justice
,udeling and Justice Taliaferro dissenting.
BY JUSTICE WHY.
ID. Ware d Son VS.. A. p. Morris: iudg.
lent affirmed. Chief Justice Ludeling and
ustlee Taiiaferro dissenting.
=. 1. Swan VS.. Ann L. Gayle; Judgment
hirmed.
The Monroe hateuigesceY says of the