Wilmington journal. [volume] (Wilmington, N.C.) 1844-1895, 1871-10-20
l:eforted for be Jouf Eal. ]
Gen.r>1S~, T1ienrlal cet~ension q ths
Protessanr EPtsooPR1% hureh sms Iht
United states A. 10. 1874 go
BALTIMORE, Nd, Oct. 18th, 1871


United states A. IL. 1871 60
BALTIMORE, Nd, Oct. 18Th, ISL
syz -F- .sr.r NINTH DAY. r,-r7..-.-fsr Il
Morning Prayer Miru5es read aud up
o owed. The com mittee appoioted by the
House Of Bishops to at with That from
the House OF Deputies, ia a. f3iiuws TIE
Bishop of Maryland, Whistinghan; the
Bishop of North Carolina. Atsinsep s.
tts Bishop of Pennss l9anis, SteveL 8; the
Bishop of western N Y, Cox; the ~fsis''
of this House they are Rev. DR.. Mead. Of
Connecticut; Rev. DR.. H4ight, of New
York, Rev. DR.. Andrews, of Virginia Rev.
Dr. Stringfellow. Of Alabans; Rev. DE-.
Beers, of Wisconsin. The baity oc this
Joint committee are Geo. u. b Jackson,
OF Maine; Jas. B. Crsigbead, O. Tennes
see; Orlando Meads. of Albany Well h, Of
Pennsylvania Andrews. of Ohio. his
Joint commi.tee will settle ritH4lism. and
prepare it for hot language in this body.
A memorial was read from :he diocete Of
Western New York, wishing that it be Ee-
ferred to a committee to report the expe-
diepcy of dropping 'hs words "And the
sou" a. read in the creed Of Constantine, as
this Seems to be the only thing preventing
connection with the Greek Church. DR..
Fl ,igi t, OF New York, ea;d that this me-
mural vas originated by Presby ter CT
the Church of England, Who has slice
joined the Church of Rome, and that the
whole matter is Lot particularly worthy If
present actIon. Several spoke agai; tie
matter 1t vas laid on the table. 1t was
referred TO the committee on the State OF
the Church, to inquire intotbeipropriety of
trsining christian wemen to take certaiG
part In the work of this Church. Il il
we'll to Il gislate on this matter as Il C post
hoe, for those christian women tave ID
many iustar ces ard places taken the mat
te. into their hands under tie f,rnal
supervision of the pastor. There was
quite debate as to who should b. eligi
bic to seats on the Board Of Miss:o! I.
was moved that no pastor should be Oh
the committee, or connected with i's
action unless he had paid or would pay an
annual Offering, since he WIS last APPOINT
el TO one of the departments Of thu Iii :
sions Working men on ct Board are
wanted. and none others. Jncge p ttl
argued, aud corclUdt d that the qua ter be
not discussed, but laid on the table. DR..
Haight, of New York, said that he hoped
the gentleman would withdraw THAI as it
cut him off from replF. The motion 10
Icy on the table was withdrawn, acu Il o
discussion opened. The motion was re-
newed to lay on the table, ard lost. II
parishes were excluded from fixing
an interes: in Foreign Mi. sIons on c
count Of not t'eing able TO contribute
many { + the tari h. South would b.. #
fectlveIy cut off I is Lot designed t3 en-
ter on articulsr criticism If members. =
The resolutions to tse e1padieLc~ tf
excluding SUBJ Pastors who d. Lot con
tribcte South aud North Ga DINA ,;ould
consider this a vote of censure. Wi hdraw-
al of resolution not agreed G.. Mach de
bate It sgre. d that a sion Ct the
Book of Common Prayer DO rr"par 4 be-
fore the LeAt tiiernIal Convention, snd
that expenses for the same he provided.
A resolution OF thanks VA carried as
regards the present Treasurer, NJ. F.
Ratchford S'arr. Judge Battle roniLf : |.
Mr.. Starr. Mr.. Starr declined 30 s.,ve Oh
account of press Of business. On Ii, nina
ton of Secretary Perry, Mr. Nathan
Matthews, OF MAJ sachIset.s, rs elected
UiUd oOee.
The Rev. Alexander Bargts, D. d, .;
Massachusetts, offer.d resolution 10 III.
effect that that part OF C4n. 6, S C = O.
Title II, ", be TT! eA;e3, or that bat Il
Cen. 5. same title, ooucer1lnS the dctoyI
ton Of minister, BE- put ON th.5 s2na>; 100.
| ing. Another gentleman referred til a. i,u
minister Can be deposed for six muLtts
Whole referred 10 q mmittee on CauUne.
Only one vote IN the Lega'ive.
DR.. Franklin, OF Indiana, now! !Lal j.
be r ferred to Committee Oh CaL ons t,
bring before this Ii use what may 10 IA
| relation to this body of the Board OF Mis-
,lons. Resolution carried.
Reeolu'l u offe' et by Rev. Mr. Shi.
man, Of Kentucky, 10 re er Il G mmittec
on CauCns to see what ac,i ion Of shio uuuse
may be Necessary as regards Ale goodlJ
discipline Of com nunIcant members IF ,li>
church. A joint committee to be had to
| report its acton at the next General Con.
vention. Mr.. Welsh, of Pennsylvania
said it was high time that the lay mem
bers of this church be Locke after. Laid
on the table. Order Of the day called for,
which is the report o. tha Committee on
Canons, on the Federate Council of the
| Dioceses within the State OF New York. ]
| have already seat you the action of the
Council of these Diocese. No Felerate
Council could act without the previous
consent Of the G. neIal Ctnve l,iou. Hei
| the matter is ro1gLt upLow. This Feds
rate Council d. Fir. it to ban Appellate
Court, to viii ID ap. g Il IA, be naaie lam
the decision Of aua ID &C >au CJnrs ia q d
State, 1. e., OF N Y ,Ik.
The Committees IL ,ti"n j. here given,
and concurs la TIL Eeport" as to the frs
article except as to :h3 Appellate Court
It declines to aop.ogs OF this, for tn. rtasor
that Article 6, Of Constitution, Confer,
upon each Diocese, in SID ssat... TIE
power to insti ut tri.l, IS. end has
therefore, the power of forming he Ap
pellate Court. Judge Shelf ,sol Virginia
argued M S. e:oquentiy Tor the non
| adoption of this Hero message NJ. 81
recelvei from 81 ,use Of Bi-hope referring
to Hymna!, was reported and aid ON table
till tomorrow at II O'Clock. This Eymnal,
if agreed to by tho two Houses, will go in
to use on the ''Feass of the Epiphany"
The debate on the ''Raport" was con-
! tinned. This Federation which the Do
otsss of New York desire that this Con-
vention should sanction, is exactly similar
to the first power granted 20 the Dioceset
in Italy revolving around the ancient see
OF Rome. The discussion was going on
| Tor some time when Mr.. Samuel B. Rug
giles, of New York, desired that this qaes-
ton be postponed until it 10 heard from
| The Committee on Oanons as to whether
bis permission can be given to forn an
Appellate Court without constitutional
amendment. The report was laid upon the
able. There was resolution referred to
Committee on Canons as TO the trial or
mode of trial of any Preshr tar ar noo.