New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1871-12-05

~ Ct S1 = r. y ~ I q z i y ~
50 80 5 q -
49, lsaelly Apala1h 4vsa ts1l1lneAl
clad; tbs To yin. NAish ~ lest q a.
e{oyod a1tee Cn4sS 6ea4A. ~ ut nd
eeaA nee tove ooqtlinod q aa1kn6u1ode
tha& ky1A- ~ HI lahi11l - &h08
4se 1T uaGo Aee NJ 'ua3V11 3lGSAna
ne cast VII pselahly - . g u
esns cosFs q tAis eeeeA nd thsts
ISssprsyss e phebs Ana J Drsu16sso.
spd, john ysaes T.ylae 70 = rscegnise6 q
chiad1sq e Ailton Taylor, aad . sSQch tAa
heirs q NJ estate, has besa dis1ied ~
judge Duvigneaud Their sclstm Was rs.
asioted BY Mary June RoGers. who had been
previously pronounced the oolo haif. -
The present week win b. Devoted 70 the
tf,.l Of jury casos in the Sixth District
u the Eighth Distrist Court, The smaa-
dalnus of the Mississippi Valley Navigation
Company e, .g on the Governor, ssehiaf t. com
thOusshd shares Of stock in the company,
~ "autA0rized" by act of the -General As
sembly. was made peresnptosy. The do
tense. on the rule to show cause, cot mp, in
the first place, that tho Governor was au-
thOrised BY the Legislature, and there6oye
not compelled to act, except ct his own dis
creti0n Secondly. that - tho constitu-
.tional limit Of the State debt had been
reached. the appropriation was of NO effect,
and could not be carried out. 4 -
10 these answers, council for the COM
psny replie, that the word s'asthorized'
meant Unjust" without any discretion, and
that the act authorizing the Governor to
subscribe for tho stock was poooed before
the act limiting the State debt. - -.-.....
Judge Emerson, who acted in the place of
Judge Dibble, recused, decided the Gov
ernor had no discretion hut to obey the act.
UsleeA 1taess Ciscaie Court.
This court yesterday, Hon. e. H. Durell,
Presiding, opened with good prospect for
The general list of traverse jurors was
called, forty two answering to their names.
The docket was then called and cases fixed
in regular order.
In the case of Reilly vs. the Board of
to file an amended hill.
In the case of Mary A. Ehepperd vs. j. S.
Knapp, Mr.. Mott moved to vacate the order
already granted for the publication of testi-
mony. =. -..---.
In re- A. 8. Mansfield, 8. @. Cookrem a.
tranaferee Of . judgment Of the United
States Court against the steamboat Rob
Roy, has fled petition to Get aside the
order ct discharge in bankruptcy granted
TO A. & lansdeld. Exceptions were fled
that the allegations of the bill were of too
general character to enable the defendant
70 respond, and moved that the bill be hence
1ismissed, ~ the time fixed BY Law wherein
opposition can have any effect against the.
discharge has expired. These exceptions
were Overruled, the amendment of the bin
1enied and the bankrupt ordered to answer
n court to such charges as were specifically
vet mp. - 80 -
Innerarity va. the United States. This
ras q rule taken by the plaintiff to file q
petition, having for its object
he introduction of parties mot heretofore
Identified with the preliminary proceedings
,efOre this court, and who have failed to
move in the premises within the time
limited by the act. Rule granted, subject
Q right Of demurrer.
The United States vs. Wood, Low e. Lud-
vigsen ct al. This is q suit on q custom
louse bond, the plaintiffs averring that the
efendants are Justly indebted to them in
In November, 1861, Messrs. Wood, Low e.
Iadwlgsen imported certain quantity of
in, which was deposited in bond, subject
Q duty of 36lO II. which the defendants
aid and withdrew their merchandise within |
year On Subsequent reliquidatiOn the |
dditional sum of Sos ~ was imposed, the |
ay ment Of which being refused, the plain |
IDS brought suit. The defendant pleaded a |
eneral denial, and put the question at |
sue The case was given to the jury to- |
~. which returned verdict in favor of |
he defendant