Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1871-10-01
LAW REPORTS.

First G,ircutt COurt-HeiskeII,J Judge.
/ Writs CT inquiry can bs executed on
| sny Monday morning, before the calendar
is taken up.
To-morrow she calendar will contain
| the following cases: l444, O'Hsrrs va
! Louisville and Nashville railroad CON-
! pany; 1lSS. Frank q Thielmsn vs. same
/ 100, Moore, trustee, VS. Pattison; l26,
| lizard, trustee, VS. Rice 4 Engel; 129
| Marshall VS. Frollick 130, mcUsrver,
/ agent, VS. Jameson; I3l, Jenkins and wife
vs. Holmes; 1872, Beatty, use, VS. Kohn; 1S4,
| Williford, administrator, va Edwards, ex-
ecus0r; I35, Dunlap VS. Wolf River packet
compsny; 1876, Lefcwich q Cash vs. File
| I37, Williams & Holmes vs Glenn q Slate;
/ l39, Trent, public administrator, VS. Dick
ems, sdninistrstrix; 140, same VS. Pattison
OF al; I43, Shack leford q Spellmsn vs.
| Piumnar ct al; I45, McBRin VS. Taylor;
l46, Shelton, guardian, VS. KintOn; 153,
| Ayers, trustee, vs. sherwood, Carpes d
| " I54, Cassen vile vs. CioellR, admin
| strstOrt l5s, Jordan VS. Ssarn; l62,
| fwohig ys Skipwith ct al; 1853,
| Watson, use, VS. Williams les,
Union bank of Tennessee vs. Will
lians, ezecutTix; l6S, Harris ct al vs.
Folks, exacutrix; l69, same; l70 same; III,
same; III, same; I74, Donegan VS. Jordan,
adIar; l76, Jones VS. PattersOn; Isl, Sny-
der Ys Bain; l8z, Weaver, trustee, Pope
et al Z; 1877. Selkirk VS. NJ 81 A OF memphis;
1ss. Thomas Snd wife rs M q A of Mem
phisl l9l, Farming VS. Lighthurne ct al /;
i92, jackson Fs Polk ct al; 1873. Cross vs.
sharpe; 1874, TenBessse national bank VS.
White; 1856, United States, use, vs. Jones
et 81 1876, Roberts vs. Brinkleyi 1871, Pas
ton. executrix, vs. U. W. EdmoDds; 200,
Hopkins VS. Dickinson; BOT Robertson VS.
Ledden: 2O8, Woodward vs. M q A OF
Msmphiss 2lQ, Weaver. trustee,
VS. Cook & Norton; 2lS, McMurry vs.
Cooke; Z2I, Creesmsn VS. M Q o r X Co;
224, GriIfin VS. Folkes, executri1; 2z6,
Holland vs Kraws ~ Co; 227, Hart VS. Ly-
man; 2S0, Rayburn rs Rysn,
second Circuit Court - HaEsey, Jadge.
All The cases set for trial yesterday were
disposed of, judgments being rendered In
nearly all. Tomorrow will be motion
day.
celloF,
October Term, 1S7I--ConVenes on Mon
day, Oct. q. 1871. Court meets at O'Clock
am. Motion day every Friday. No court
ON Saturdays. Cases set for Monday, Oct.
3D.; l. Aiken VS. Dodds; 2, Nelson VS. Ber-
nard; g. Sanderlin va Sanderlin; 4, Lyon
VS. Gaines; 5, Carter vs. Conant; 8, Ayres
W Bradley; z, Bradley VS. Ayres; s, Bick-
ford VS. Coleman; 9, Smiley VS. Coleman;
Aus Ldi6 vs. NUAbAAuLs liz hlLf1btAu4 w
Coleman; II, " hite VS. Coleman; Is, Genin
VS. Coleman; IA, Amis vs. White; 10, Al
pine rs Satfarans; IL, Sangster VS. Saffa-
rams, Is, Williams VS. Williams; 10, De-
LOsch VS. Null; 20, Yates vs Null; q,
clayton VS. Null, 22, Mills vs Ford;
Ss sSss.ks VS. CockTell; "a, Hswley Us
Carroll: 81. s3owell VS. Kirbyi 20, Baxter
VS. Crescent Mntusa Insurance company;
80, Owens VS. Bangus; IS, Morton vs. Mem
pbis Building and Loan Association; 80,
Davis, exparte; 81, Bishop VS. Place; 4g,
Garrett, exparte petition; Al, Union bank
of Tennessee VS. Thomasons 4S, Cox Vs
Walker; As, Valentine VS. Woodrutii 4b.
Boggan vs. Stewart; AZ, Parker Ts Ham
msr; 43, Weaver VS. Bland; so, Petit VS.
Brown; 81, Burr VS. Gibson; 81, McLans-
han VS. Lee; So, Clay brook VS. Heidel; "a.
Thornton vs. Shuman; 55, Hancock VS.
Dogan; SO, same; 59 Lane va Hayman;
So Memphis and Louisville Turnpike Co.
VS. Blackwell; 81, Wickershsm VS. Hsrse-
ley; 80, Bradford VS. Cherry; 65, Harris VS.
Van Dyke; 66, Dunn VS. Dunn; II. McRae
VS. McCounelli "a, Parker, exparte
petition; 75, Parker VS. Parker;
IA, Davis VS. Psine; rs, Provine vs. Stewart;
79 Belts VS. Titus; 80, Watson VS. Stsrke
81, Welsh VS. Devices; S6, Wickepsham vs
Cheek SO, Phelan VS. McDsvitt; OF, Dalton
vs. Morton; "a, Deloaoh VS. McNamara; 96,
Ralney vs Rsiney; e5, Hicks VS. Early; 81,
Lsftwich vs. Buntyn; 9S, Glenn Va Petit;
99 Morris VS. Jones; 101, Chenowith VS.
Abbott; l02, Gsrvin vs. Clark; 104, Kirt-
land VS. Ferguson; lO6. Gill Va Depans; los,
Hewett VS. Looney; l07, Hall Ys Gale; 10e,
Carey vs. Mcmahon; 12S, Forrest VS. Jones;
ia, Gills VS. anne; 126, jackson insurance
company vs. Hunt; 127, Barbour VS. Bar
bouT; LIS, Chase vs. Walt; 129, Crane VS.
Flaherty 100. Davis VS. Stovsll 13l,
Pierce 4 Co vs. Flaherty; 1872, Stock
ley vs.. Trigg, lss. Walker rs same;
I3z, Palmer Va Richardson. 1856, Mix VS.
Richardson; 1855, Taylor vs. Oakley; 137.
Meath VS. Smith; 13S, StillmRn VS. Dsvie;
1se, Stillmsn Us Lincoln; 40, Lloyd VS.
Quimby, lsI, Bradford VS. Cherry; la,
GRylord vs. Quimby; 14S, Gaylord VS.
street; IA, Costsn vs. Galloway; 1z5, Cash
vs Guthrie, 146, McGrsth rs Kellsr; 147,
Nooe VS. Hal; 14S, Baxter VS. Baxter; 1<e,
Baum q Co. VS. Minter; Loo, Norris VS.
Kellar.