The daily Panola star. (Sardis, Miss.) 1871-1872, 1871-11-04

IL. A. = - . -. =
isr Hys, ne 9pns 4 xht u Vain" hut.
I'LL ~, NnH snoa'd We 60 without the
t a. Eenifi iamn slts, Let us
snelsn tse tse1s. icy ~ the improve
nt " ~ faffs NC ths poao they De-
eV"s ex''pcss
Ths rsss1~.~c~oss....,.,~
~. s..s....' s..,s., Y -..'',s's'. ses
sv,5sacs ~ ,.,..!s,s. I. Y =. W.
'isi-.sS - = II ss,ssa A ~. ,oau,y plV.
ncsisi.r- sci..... 49, wv ~ac,sis "
g,dis i.ss,ia - sss s'ss ~, st,as. . euoious
,rssrr.asssss' s...s,., s.s ss,~sn's .. Y. ehance
~ ,i1,,s ,,.irS-,,s., 4. .!,,s....sa = \. ou M ~
X. ~, .s,,airss = - s...a r', ~ - may
hc.f orIv INA n. ~ a ..a,,',tr.i sua ,s,se az
nav hsnyn.r hy -s !" ~ ~ " o an ,n'.'. .ss wno
~, =, ~ sSe ~, avNV 'ua. ~
10 n s.rssssa.sh.'l h''s s.n s,au sou,a
w.n,iaS svd ~ g"s o,asn a'.vss,ne. ~
s.rs. hana,,s ns s.at ~ y .a, .a, uese, "
sesi,,,s s.s'.ss,;ss,'' s.s 'vJs s,',s
vsris;s., ~ hv osJ, sx,nen", ~ hS~ van noa oe
can NOT ba = innnrai ,o as i,ah,l,, 'rakoi .saasss
ovsr % 10 ana II sor o,L ,ha ,h.,st ~ ns,y p's,.u
el",n, 'ns as az ~ ,,;, rhI sness ,e',sy Ky ~ p,o-
man so,sI 81 .0 ,,,,,,i,; ,av ra5 .,a' ,h my nu
- =. ~ = az len e., y. "vu, .nss We
Hon ~ .,hSch ~ ar.aisyy y ~ apyaeoi pt,aas !.
t'vi ,',.a ~ Wi, wnen .ne oolIelas'se oDJco. Is
.sie, Ii, VIZ y oaly Nv Iohslcllon ~ .le
% intm,;o. mupposc ,ia IIlas ne lepa,es n,s
,,n. ba, my =. yai.u .a;,' os.usI ~. you,
S. s.al na'o Ia .v sao'i ,ns.ilos
IL ~ SoS ,asV, a,.a ~ nSnvs.L ueas
,Jo sor, ~ =, sa, neasn
aa. Pnenonsnon ~ " na,u'1oi ,n,. wulOn VIC ean
"r nvs iai.se a,os ans ausqua.c nno",eug' ae we
n.y v,oso w. az auien. " sRiu aoss.
an1 s,nuoa.o uui pvoeuue on
MY s.vuhu .uae III IN, .esion Vi nts'
,ns,p.es w tilFle 4, can . ~ ~ ~. iar.isi plool'
IVY; w may aasV a,,r,n silas 'ne inssiuos ssi; pe- r.
S sacret cnuowmen, h anu ueiac at,. IN N
p'opo po.;not ~ wy s.puvus a i;aa iasu ao., ~
o,o e yeo. !. a.e.s, ~ niay, linz, inu ese,y
s o.nel iGnction VI tme nu'ian spsri1, vi
apse from hrre uisuse. nuI IL we are
W succeed III even suggesting uoupl
70 tne mlna q our opponent as 70 tee
accuracy OF MS analysis; we mus. Veriiy
our primitlve oeilei, anu exhioit US creu-
ehtiais 50 lar as Ihat Is possiDie. we must
snow why We can not trace lts geneaiogy
lartner pacA; or resolve u into simpler
eemehes, anu we must lot Keep its ma
ture snrouueu IN darKneSs, Dut disclose
u 80 iar as may be. rms, then, Is our
task.
Inc instnct 70 wnlcn we make our
uinmate appear =, n its nrsL rise IN tine
soul, cruuc, dini, anu marucuiate.
Grauually u Shapes Itself lnto greater
clearnesS, alded, IN the case oi most men,
oy the myrlau influence OF religions
thought and OF historical TRADITION
UGlVnTenlnF ann rpllnIDV III WUHn G0lpR0.
out not creating it separating the real
gold from any spurious alloy 1t may
have contracted. Like all our innate in
stincts this one Il at first infantile, and,
when It begins to assert itself, it prattles,
rather than speaks coherently. We do
not here raise the general question Of the
existence of prioTi principles. We as
sumo that the mind Is not originally an
a5rasa tabula-but the endowments with
which it starts are all gifts in embryo.
They are not full formed powers, so
mueh as the capabilities and potentiali-
ties of mental life. Their growth to ma
turity is most gradual, and. the differ
ence between their adult AMI their rudi-
mentary phases is as wide as Is the inter-
val between a mature organization and
the egg from which it springs. 1t is
therefore, no evidence against the reality
or the trustworthiness OF the Intuition to
which we appeal that Its manifestations
are not uniform, or that it sometimes
seems absent in the abnormal state of
consciousness, or, among the ruder civil
izations of the world. We admit that it
Is difficult for the uninitiated to trace any
affinity between its normal and its alb
normal manifestations. when 1t Is modi-
fed by circumstances to any extent. We
farther admit that while never entirely
absent, It NAV sometimes seem to slum-
Der. not onIy in strly individuals, but In
"a a or an era, and be transmitted from
generation to generation in latent state.
Il nv hibernate. and then awake as from
the sleep of We RS, arising against the
will of its or and refusing to be
sienced. Almost any phenomenon can
quench it. It IS the spontaneous utter
ance Of the soul In presence of the object
whose existence it attests, and as such 1t
is necessarily prior to any act of reflec-
tion upon Its character, validity, or sig-
nificance, Reflex thought, which is the
product of experience, cannot in any
case originate an intuition, or account
for those phenomena which we may call
BY that name, supposing them to be de-
lusive. Nothing In us, from the simplest
instinct to the loftiest intuition could in
any sense create the object 1t attests, or
after which 1t seeks or feels. And all
our ultimate principles, irredccible by
analysis, simply attest and assert.-
British Quarterly Rsvieo.
I SAUER kRAUT.-Ihe best we ever ATE
we made ourselves for many years, and