Sunbury American. [volume] (Sunbury, Pa.) 1848-1879, 1871-01-14
(Reported by A. N. Brice, ESQ. }

\ theported by A. N. Brice, ESQ.,
CoUET RooEEDrNas.--FRTDAY, Jan. O, 1871. -
Com We 8. b. Boycr.-gA Aggravated assault and bat
tery and assault and battery. BY leave OF Court
continued to next term Of Quarter Sessions.
Com vs Joseph Conrad.--Chargc of removing
personal property with intent TO defraud credl-
tors. Conrad brought into Court by bis bail,
George Welser and delivered into the custody OF
the Sheriff,
MoSDAI, Jan. 9, 1871.
Court met at 10 o'clock, A, NJ. Judges all
present.
Daniel Dunkeberger vs. Daniel stetger.-Judg-
mont entered against defendant for S29.15 for
costs.
Jacob Reigel & Co. VS. DIS. Herb & Co.--On
motion Judgment entered for S1.2i2I7 for want
Of an appearance.
Henry Hcpler Va Henry Kclser, Jos. n. Porter,
and Dietzman.-On motion, judgment entered
for want of an appearance for &5l9S s. with costs.
VIM. L. Grayer VS. D. S. Herb & Co.--On mo-
an appearance.
/ VIM. fIaag md Dctwcilcr VS. James Scott
Judgment entered for Slo4.S5
John T. Bartsh vs. Charles Reuter.--Judgmcut
entered for $il7.50 for want Of an appearance.
/ John Y. Colt vs. John scholoiN.--Judgmcut
entered for slol.7O for want orun appearance.
J Charles r. Little vs. Norman Cleveland. d.-Judg
meat entered for s7OO fog want Of un appear
nncc.
J. NJ. Follmor, Agt., VS. Casper scholl.-Rule
entered to show causc why bail In thi, case
should not be forfeited.
Daniel Fry vs William Hcrring.-Julgment
catered by default for 1920. 50 for want of au ap-
pearance.
Cyrus HolTa and Jacob Hofra VS. Peter S. Hand
/ lcy.-Judgment entered for slG3.49 for want of
an appearance.
Harrison Helm VS. Solomon Millcr.-32 Aug
T., 1867. Summons in case. Jury returned
verdict in favor OF defendant Counsel for de-
fsndant except to the charge Of the Court and
move that the same Be fled with the evidence
and made part of the record.
L. S. Bcidleman VS. Franklin Foust.-Judg-
mcnt for want of Plea in the sum Of SlG.IS.
John j. Wlyard Us Margaret Wilyard.--On
motion, an alias subpoena in divorce granted.
Eliza Laportc vs. JOS. +. Hull and David Hull
Judgment entered for SIlS.4l for want of au ap-
pearancc.
Petition presented for charter OF Incorporation
for Mutual Building and Saving Fund Assoca-
ton Of Milton. Publication having been made
it was directed that the same be recorded and be
made a body polite in law, &c.
II. W. Creary & Co. vs. William II. Gass and
Charles Richart.-Judgmeut entered for the sum
CT :241.42.
TUESDAY, Jan 10, 1871.
John Hummcl, Administrator Of Isaac Beidic-
srach, decd, VS. John W. Hopewcll and Sol.
Wescr.-Judgment entered for SlS3.15.
Charles Boyle vs. Kline & Co.-No. 80 Jan. T.,
1867. Summons in assumpst. The facts in this
case liz in the ncighborlood Of the quiet town Of
Trevorton. Boyle worked for Kline & Co., in
burning charcoal. He was employed ten weeks
at q chArge Of Sl7.5l Ter week. Defendants are
willing to pay $500 per day. The dispute was
IN reference 10 the difference Of amount in these
two sums.
WEDNESDAY,, Jan II, 1871.
Sheriff Heller came into Court and .scknowi-
edged the following deeds:
,oAp 3. Heller to John IIaas, Farcy & Co.,
for property in SAamokin, amounting to $500,
sold aa the property Of Henry 5ultcrs.
same to \. VI. still for tract OF ground con-
taiDtu.: I acres in ZcrJe township, sold as the
property Of David Morgan and Lyman 5. Weaver,
fer the sum Of $50.
Sanr to John Haas, Tsgoy & Co., for two
tracts O: land in Upper augusta township, sold
aa the property Of John T.. Lsaer, iyg The sum Of
$50,
Same to \. B. Still, for tract Of ground col-
tanning 10 acrcs situate in Zssbe township, sold
as the property Of David Morgan and Lyman $.
Weaver, for tue sum of Sl0O.
Same to Suubugy Saving Fun! and Building
e D.. Tg..| 9 lie.
in sunbury, sold as !ho property of VIM. Reagan,
for the sum Of %.
Same to Richard B. Douty, for a lot Of ground
In Shamolin, sold rs tie property Of John J,
L her, gor the sum of E3o.
same 10 Joseph Everett, for 4 lot Of ground in
the Borough Of McEwcnsyll'e, sold as the pro-
petty Of J. II. Irwin, for The sum Of $5l.
same TO Richard b. Douty, for Il lot Of ground
In the Borough Of Slamokiu, sg.@ as The proper
ty OF John J. Esher, for the sum Of $50.
Same TO William Reed, for a lot Of ground in
Trcyorton, sold as the property OF David Morgan
and Lyman :. Weaver, for the sum Of S340.
Andrew NJ. Eastwick vs. Wm. L. Ta.fcnstcn
with notice to Charles IIcl!c0stcin, tsTt tcleu,.
50. IS, Jan. T., lsOS. srirc Faoias TO revive
judgment, no. =2s, Nov. T., lSG7. Verdict ID
favor VI. defendant.
WWmm Tu-leuau vs Benjamin Hcndrlcks.-
40. lO3. August T., 1867. Summons IN Cove
u1Dt. Verde, in Ii. SUN Of 5l5.5Si. damagys
on motion, ru5c entered to show cause why j1!z
mcr, should not be entered witEou, costs.
Charles Bog.e VS. Kline ~ Co.--S1mmons il
assnmr-t. No, 81, Jan. T., 1867. Verdict II
favor OF Boyle for $40.