New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-02-02

Tne ny was adg9cated by dessrs UPsoS dop, Obio)
MI PLhIT Rep va SAID that he would have PFC
etIed Ho eitlte ioea o. t Oitn, DIt uat =:
vote Tor ~ ana ne hqped that eyer msinor Wh0 desired
10 zee V tg1 ~ , 1o ISun ~ w, I2p
nc House directed by The RePp9csn garty Of virginia
c cI yGSo ,G p 19 He Iep 6 0oT I s ran
gerton OF his colleague GfcKenncj VINO .taed before
the holidays that the Republican party al virginia had
P Eo-y P Ic ,l' ~ i ~ ailosu2u1 terms,
not taken stand in favor ~ Universal Amnesty Tho
di,,sioS and snare and The tue policy Of Govrcnf
was to remove ain disfrauchising clauses and agay
| all tost Oaths.
W. LONG Rep, Gal, one Of the coored reprc.a na-
tivcs In the House made bis frat speech in opposition 70
the bill, claiming that the men whom it would relieve
e no is nj The Rebellion more than 20 10, Il men
bad been ktd ID Gt,Isi' az no ~ oI b,I ,i'ep
ts S gn i Gy 10 his constituents and 10 I'M.
country by voting a21n7' tg Pi would vote for the hin
hut ,d I,cH riirr vote for the total abolition Of the
nu. VIZ WI i a. rl ~ In poitiral disabilities IL
was not by tho malntenan't OF 1ucn nft va. OUT
| rae, ~ tno ,O,'tn 80. 49, ~ w. -
MI MAYNARD lffp, Ienl aEu ih IS Iaf r"r IA
ana pre.ehts9 CO.. 'ror ry, had rcporei
;h@ Kin Gutre1 THO communication represented tne
me Dlil luLe n az bci,,g f., !. lcipr.. ana de.
pora6c c2ndn agd Of sc me gS 2 End yote
mercy OF t!' t'ct H. ~ CSy.riDenf H. c~,ra.sod his
bccf t4ot Here we're more men practically d>nanchsed
IN IenLess,e tIi-y tna ~ ,of ,bc Sal" GOV.
eminent the only difference being that ilen ilry W'Lo
olslancLised 10y KEW, 4I nov py w. I'ri,n ,,cn ar
the Rebels that were TO be Gisfranclised be would s9y;
| our iiiehd' LI1I ana tt our tu'Hlt- W. li
| He condemned that d.! cradle MAINLY pamy /. Hl-
lnca.isih HIncn WIS qohs nor. ~ - ~ i III is
81 to HOFeIIhoh' al" O''''hIo" j. '''" ' am ''' NV
hosts - ,,.,,s No., A., .,., ,,.,o,,, o s.,.r,
Dr. DA WIZ tifSep3 NtIs) hqurGl g. of
| contrary to tIgt which was Intended
~ 81 sii SS 1re IndJ 6pp6Ssd and argued AGAINST
the liz declaring n. E1Th ;ne,' TO rclca,r any PAT
~ & lrth t tb,v showed by their conduct tlat they
| were worthy OF. ,,,,
Dir PORIEf Oh'p" fiJ ol'sr1 , t H. ny, t T I'hiu
plS o, S3a wa, e 't t ~ nt Of ccv hoo ~ tie
tie cQItfat1' ~, t ~. ~ 49, ~, ,,,los1
nn tc. TeT .,cnIcd In III own ri t rot Only ia
freedom ron the hand Of violence" hni i ter ciF aug
Rohue%d 's'S "lI me nv j" '''
III. ~ , ~ i.,,,,tcs li.y,ed ia NJ Por-
Al u, me % c i" " prI noycd mad be- 10
! M NJ GOV Geu X y o,irctod saving that when no
wanted {" reply TO- persona " n S, Ir5 Ki"ord
wa. mo nm. IA, man il me House mean enough t0 object
a. 'i pCt-Il TED HAT tle member fIom tha With
n I ~ was the 6nly member Of the House
! Dl',tIr, o. ~ ~ NJ Ia I'm rep.rI,
r. CUV r'li,j i fe .dst Of much confusion and
calls to ordarj that at meanug Porer was rot
me man I'D "t,,i l,."I -. nat , fgttine man
! WIN wa, nc'n"oi WIN WAC '''
| Mr.. VAN WICK Dem. y. y. opposed The D, 9nd
TeniLovu 'n t y Tp"'ica1 meeting M Petersburg Va
at which he MT. Van "ye9 was present. heDe' cNeef'd
MI "a - Ircj ort tt Rebel crowd I'M about two
ii ;r,,,a sa" '''''''' ''' ''''
| Nj AN WICK remarked f.arcastlcally) that II tho
eol.gcd men In Petersburg had not had more courage
ii yy,i not have ,cn cleared out" lIaughterI
,Tr III tIT G1 the mid n OF much misc and coniusion
~ ,S r5,', tj,e ,a.E t.tIjji,l at
t1ptrd to mike Limsrif heard in reply but hi, voice
VS. drowned in the lin lie vas undl r~ood TO ,4y.
| 0rG which was more than the member from Ncw-YoTk
| ar van WvclD bad done.
| Mr.. ARNELL Rer, Tern) argued against the hill
Mr. BfN "a DEM hyl sit lIt h1uo,9 il,oi - ,ur
co i.nral! ms ii.e lie would read 10 the House tho
SEQ hS %In eiS 5' Ea,rd 70 TX As,s
Cr5' IT, o,, oyfr,ct nom me Gl65sof that yoarJ
nj, ar &c, orii t ~ ' ,' he Two gaIttmcn rom
n, AGAINST If it almost fance that he was the ghost
! Of hamie,'s father, crying, "soear! swear. swear"
fd W. TGa , i R south Vas suffering under TIE in
ieli2ent ~he pe'lt Oh the country o0"n . a"t ~ ~
would break down tie dam. II The government 81 Ten
chiscd people to come back nro the d and 70 vote and
hold Office they would not nave had any OF ne l..bie
Tennessee had be- can e." by NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.
". AkEf Ii. "s,y - MA 90 % q ,o,t o,, &,
Missouri There .cre Acknowledgement and dsquaiitss
ION there alG XJa see INC e.tyo n see it llg
Won atteIgit his thing Y.u cannot in q Republican
Go ti ar Of t 5r,nf; YOU cannot do II.
- NJ TIL ~ Iron r ami arscd i'm suprort of tho
reicG[ VIZ ever log trouble. in the south.
NJ fITTER i,ap 5il.j closed the debate He said
that he Ind reported he bIl the mouhIsece Of tho
committee On Rccois.rucYn but he could not support
it. livery giving way d.. Coneres had so FAR allowed
Of the Union. That the difficulty which he found IN
would never he repealed II was patent Of nobility Tor
royg 5eearHS 10 'g i1cSItrd and asked Mfr.
rir 10 o,.r , q? yace @What do you mean,
Sir br The - Fi,Ki,xF Al. wtr me that"
to saw tIt C5lss W,s relaxing aud giving way TO the
| Rebels N the time. 49,. 800. .,., MAJ, g.. tro,,