The New York herald., 1871-11-24
TIE FE1TEHTH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT
The Committee on Protests Decide
Against Kiiian.
9sEarns Not lnvandated Either by hrsgulsri-
tasa Negligence, ignorance or Hiscon-
duet Of Inspectors Poll
Clerks or 0therA

tween Aiexander Frear aud Frederick Ktlian VIII
- itesd today before the Board of Cassassers:--
sss on Profess 70 who. Wa. referred sh,
s DE tifteouh Assembly JisiricI respectfully report:
That the SAID protest sss forth tha The Election
n.:sms The ssr s o eerscSs aons a
sssi POI s ~: :sss ss
nsnbet Of Assenbg in said dsssriO. smounts 70 1s0
three oSsf ecos ss Sisss. S. IN sai .sn sos
elsr iocs ncanva.sas Saoa csss for me- msmSsI @
iasi lie Esssh Election district OF the Twentieth ward
s.sssss e:s,e, ass.s y s.il Asssmoly di.srio
= :. not seass oaO1s member Of Assembly
.sd that person who neaer an Inspector
Sis,. :. S1 =
:ss s
n = "a 1,o r. .s. % s smd ~ soS.
"a shas siioss were cast 70 member Of A.
sDly wuIo rsrs not or e
vsrd. aaoi driS. IL the said xsssby .rct psrsss
se,sss' s: os Il
inss soes "a each box N the % order prs.oPSsd y
s., .sd failed % procalasion e the result q
s q soa or
&c. Is. Of Ss s
a.ss puese oral proclam.t.en Of the whole number Of
- WIN ess wSieS such pesssn sa w.s ss
- IL said district for the osnss,sss none q which we're
s S :. rsa ssss Or s To- r
he asks ina. the several ocs
- b casss..sa " the Board q County C.n,s.sers
having decided hear he upon andavts
p
o. sse rwsnssh ward - TO the altered bs
s OF votes the rstuTns member Of Assembly,
s. na p :Hs % ss
:as sas %' 2. A.s%s s
.vis q Frederick Ray sisnSer and wacser that hs
s yo,sr q .ss tsnh Isc',SD district q ne lwsntsta
Ssrson .at the being received
op 0ps q sssoa VA. r.. am
s. Of EIsson and poa clerks took par. in the o
~ar Sao. i1s ss
NJ member Of Assembly which canssssed or esii
the sSd.1t Ras l. Schs%ad s1is 10
e s@1s. ss TweS g.
sh csIs ana also ns sd., q Ersasrck Ki.n made
so,s Of the Twentyhh Llecon district we're canvassed
Tse counsel for mr. Kisn also produced tho .ndavs Of
he n.y .cs Sr e. .d
sk ksn fGs t.e ocs Of member Q, Assembly IN the said
tsav Of many other rs'dens and voters of said district
ne Ihlrd Fa Election dsrlcis and The counsel ior
kisn submitted that - - shoss disrcss tho protest
Upon II. statement ., ne the concluded
County Canysssers bad power authority reject
a Tho sd y 70 IN sns snS
IN G s ae heard
tyoa shi: poc and having given the matter .her most
ihaa .se Board Of canvaSss have 70 reject
as aSs. Of ssnn
bsa sse S duis: q the Board as fao1s mo 1'' pre-
roe: q i. county ana man make such s,asmsnss
.eut shall tLsn b dehvered and Deposited with the
Thi. provision ID sufficiently clear and explicit. to show
me % hs s 20
-. 70 .h. he acts arc purely ministerial and !ha.
But to make the matter sim certain .uo.s-
NE Bo.rI OF County Canyassers have power reject
ssa.Is: q ;ss is:pss;sI: Other slssss p
s:
% ' .s'is:'a grssps s' ss:s
Your COMMITTEE that Ibis princpls was deviasd
re- that .ioas Ser action ,S.. saa.
u..iss BY asisoa Of The Supreme Court the Dc.
DIy ns Tor lS S SSmee aITa urged to dS
= guilty Of usrpaion and wrong they to fol-
lie escsons Of The Court on this subjec, are unan
oas ana dscsss The rule % s as DECLARED & By the cs q
den p s7ihs. county canyas.ers. with !egasr re.
nrn from district Inspectors before them which fair
,ima.cs unreliable by rowdysn the polls
regular leave the parties a.Greved to their
same ess.t the OF Judge Gilbert, OF the
Supreme Couri aeivereis Al Brookyn only few ago
county Can1ssssrs Of kinss equity '' 'A' 00A'a
Your connitee ec.der hat uaer the law and the decis
E eiscton di.c through the negligence,
Mel sa rsgrs The counsel Tor the conestani enaeavors
e pss ,Ss, . an ess AZ the sssSons Of The
nrn made by them va: IN really ~ return whatever
,rocIana.,ioa or the number Of votes cast in any
ssn Il s g. ssas sy hs s rT rsusn sy
made by DE inspectors was no return whatever Your
-Four eSmies regard view various sn.elnsn.
end eni. q the law q. TO secure
deprive sunrasss lie law insiaacs,
.s y Or u. @ % SS or
ss.dr VINO .s~, any person The
s"isioa q f he e.ns.s: oi each vol:
q % s rsos e % ros =. s
anb "a vase, 70 each eanald..s n.mips he once
sa G sgo,nce .. Of ; CA. n h. d,rs
I.a. . VIA Tslas &. q: .Is Is:e:esr: @
wso s The 1.rs ,n,sec:0 y sas, ,s. all, allowed
ss - aee peoa oral o. lie result Of .Ss
s .s sS.s voting ia ls.. district
Having a.sIminsa ss.. ,rregnlsrue. the Of
y. or sS sy 'ss ou % con
- % IA = pS a 3. I.s
2Aken OF votes the
8h6 or Eighteenth EA,con districts OF the Twentieth
6ar ae.ed the ars Of the csntesant and
- utee reirsped from hearing any Spporng andavts
ssAAve srcts not believing tna the audavs Of
s presented gro2nd wnatees 10 justify the
beard III Canvssess IN rerng the vote az these dsr
committee however. before LEAVING the considerA-
Hon theso from Expressing
surprise the ccolnsss and rnhishIns enroney Of
ths Fredeak Ray. challenger and watcher IN
s E,ehh econ dxlrict cxndidsts fos inspector Of
6ecaLou f1ns uisre w, tbs late eiectou, tecened
kpwars the TDntcth ward for
6As ONCE voluntarily and osibe .iey makes sndavil
sl violated the election one OF the rema kabs
yd nces OF tbs dcsensy OF the tnes and Of the
bss with which esl thsf soss for election o1ee
Of The MS Hkes fArlts o
kso 10 dsrrive fhs cxenA0 this ci iihcr franchise
In reard 20 the vote Tie FIRST Ejecon distrc OF tho
9wenteih ward beAus apparent discrepancy be-
ween the NUMBER OF vocs md the pob nt nnber u
oars returned Tor tho oca Of member Of Aasem by,
ksmmce deemed proper the inspectors in the dis
kJrt should bs fos to explain the discrspancy.
sppexred coufnittee and stated
as persons essed and s 4S3 vssd In the
Dstric why fhs OF AL the persons