Knoxville daily chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1882, 1871-03-21
Proceedings I'm Chancery.

The following are the proceedings had in the
Chancery Court on yesterday, Hon. o. P. Tenn
pie presiding:s Fgst = = rzrx
The Peoples Bank, ct al, VS. S ID Mitchell 81
| Co, ct al Thos Oldham, Receiver, ordered to
make anstGnter report.
| Andrew Talbot VS. JAS K Mcknight; dismiss
ed at cost of defendant. fs
X MI McClung, executor, VS. Margaret McMil-
Ian, ct al; case reinstated on docket and Perez
Dickinson, regular guardian of Lucinda Alex
ander, made defendant
Chas Baum, ct al, VS. n Currier; two months
time given defendant in which to answer.
4 w G Newman VS. Jos i and A l. King
canse transferred to Chaneery Court at Athens,
because of the incompetency of Chancellor
Temple.
g NJ Branner VS. Frank Branner, ct al; Clerk
to pay out money to Mrs. E G Branner or so
NJ d Bearden VS. Foster & Holder time given
Holder to file answer.
Isaac w George; admir- &c, VS. Jno w Os-
borne, Ell Messrs Webb & Taylor appointed
guardians I'D Item and solicitors for minor;
Thomas Z Crookshanks VS. w l. Russell, ct
al; Thomas E Champion, Esq, appointed guar
dian adj titens for minors
Chas ] McClung, ct al, ex'r, VS. r 81 Gardner,
ct al; Ellen Marshall allowed to put in her
separate answer
and d L King VS. Liddy Duncan, ct al; or
der for account revived and case recommitted.
Report Of & M as to funds on hand and ex-
animation of official bonds made.
Susan White VS. w A White; divorce grant
ed to complainant.
d II Cummings VS. Samuel Mccarthy, ct al
case revived VS. G W Graham, de 6onis non of
- Phillips, decd.
NOTICE TO SOLICITORS IN cHANcERY
The following named causes are set for trial
on this day: II -
l. Bearden& Smith, Executors, VS. Rufus NJ
Bearden,
2 G w Graham VS. VIM Bronson & Co.
g. Wright, Griffith s. Co We w Kahn ct al
4. Baker, Wright & Co VS. j Nichol and
others.
g. LA Kidd VS. R Fl Luttrell ct al.
6. Thos G Hoyle ct al VS. ] HARRISON ct al.
Z. A A Barnes VS. City Bank of Nashville etal
8. A S Hudiburg VS. @ w Yost ct al.
9. S S Bowman s Co VS. n Fats ct al.
10. Thomas Brinkman VS. Morrow and Storm.
IL. S Mcintosh VS. w G Kahn, Trustee, &C.
II Henry Bales ct al vs. + + Heiskell ct al.
49, E E McGorlick VS. Bridges Robinson.
A. A G Jackson & Co VS. Sligo Mining and
Marble Co.
To- Kennedy & Curry VS. Sligo Mining and
Marble Co. &
16. R P Fox and Jos Davenport VS. William
Ingles ct al.
II. Peter R Knott VS. Sharp s. Fox.
Is. w p Washburn VS. Horace Maynard.
10. A g Welcker, executor, VS. Margaret and |
S Welcker.
20. Henry Doyle VS. VIM Lackey.
Il. Jas r Pace VS. Plumlee 81 Mabry. |
% John Blevins VS. VIM M Cooke ct al. |
%. VIM Moore VS. Fl L 81 J. Cox.
"a. + Sanford, agent, &C., VS. Chas Ducloux. |
Is. 1redell d Wright VS. 81 T Cox ct al.
The following named causes are set for trial |
on the 22nd instant:
l. Longstreet, Bradley & Co VS. III T Cox s. |
Bro.
2 j c Aver 6 Co VS. John jackson.
8. Melius Carrier ct al VS. II L 81 j i Cox
4. Haynes, Baxter 81 Fleming vs. Swan s. |
Mabry.
s. Mabry and wife VS. Galbraith & Griffith
6. w H & G w Prater VS. Elizabeth Ish ct al
Z. NJ McClung, administrator, VS. Margaret
Mcmillan, ct al.
8. Columbus Powell VS. w A Branner, ct al.
9. Mary and Ellen White VS. James d Cowan
and wife, ct al
TO- G Powell VS. Thomas j Blanchard
II. Eliza W Postle VS. + Esperandieu
- Samuel Croft VS. Nelson Mynatt
10. f Nj Anderson and wife VS. Martha L Nc
Clellan, ct al.
IA. G w Vest and L NJ Wester VS. A HUI
diburg, ct al.
Is. James Wilson VS. James NJ Toole.
16. T. Campbell VS. Samuel Snapp, ct al.
II. James Hill s. Co, ct al, VS. J w Patter-
son.
1S Bruce & Cook VS. John III Parker, ct al
49, VIM III Turley VS. John Bleyins, ct al.
20. Julius Ochs & Co VS. w G Price ct al
q. V Berger & Son VS. w G. Price, ct al.
% Kuhn, Meter & Co VS. Fessenden Co.
%. Frederick Seibel VS. w G Price, ct al
"a: Margaret w Mcmillan VS. NJ Davis, adj
ct al.
%. David Van Lew VS. John Hayes, ct al.
By order of Court.
NJ. i. PATTERSON, c. & NJ.
March 81, 1871
Gents Fine Patent Leather Opera Boots