Dallas herald. [volume] (Dallas, Tex.) 1849-1873, 1871-12-23

ilant ifft Hhsui o.
fssfsf fHf ffffffiff fnfuff
o. zoe FL iansi tis ffssfsii ~ fsii
fsiif fsaaist itfssft itsif issus sssu
- b. ias "a iassf side itfsssi'fs tsi
itsstli sfaffsiiT isfiaiiss AZ iifstts.
ttsf srs isss e. ~ rsiifssls issu sa
sssfT eaiT a. . o. iAsu ed ssTfrisill
issn ales ils sssitsfu fssiss ihs Trass
sssaiussisi asi ibs iuissssi.sasi stish
lssf "a ssasy o. hsai sFsui, fTan The
sais a. b. esnsfnsi late isAsiiau. "
isst shsa NE cls,iiisiiss 'Asn h. sitter
"a is silss IL. Ssas n Ties ihint Ia
urangs iisi he lltHatn shsai h Tsilis
ins oFsF ihsss ihiuEs AL eTasiRI = h,ils
sFsT ihs resy tssiiny ~ psllss- naT
hisAis sfths Natshashis DsnasTs, tall
" . less - ~iaiii' AL a fsliisg fTam
sFass' Ga he part ~ the llEHAlp, Oar
sIaaky hFs'hsrs II The Teas Ness 'eaai
he here sfrpndiaiion, OaF kiai nsiEh-
haF Il he MsHiHHsy EnquirsT is net sat-
isksl ia the asiisT, sRI eur digaihs'i sad
,sll beloved e. lshsrsT of it. TYLER Re
porter sEsR STACKS Marshal %. Roberts
~ Nss lsrk, aAi tries, IhTsagA = rsPuh'
lisaiioA 'raA that TsSil, reckless, GRAFT
pspsr ,hs Ssw York Iim.., - csHnssI
him Siih the fAmpany Rihg she's IL is
notorious lhsI he took al AsliIs part in
PuiliRg il dean,
Naw all this exhibits . great deal Of
shaI San Slick weali call "humsh natter, %
We esni blame them much for . little
gTuIRbiiag aud illnaiurs, bu, they should
not be 100 Lard upon the llERALD for 10
very natural rejoicing, A. the mas said,
wi,y sss'sy. il mlsLI be JiasreRi. We be-
lisye abe Reporter vas not opposed To the
Southern Pacific running through Tyler,
u Il ersssei the Central near Wstshssi,ie,
. il is possible that the Democrat nigh, be
mere amiahls towards II, Ani II the Trsn..
continental had dspo, at Mckinney, our
heigLbor u tie Enquirer might be better
satisfied; AHd II on the other hand, Dallas
was lefI entirely out In the cold, Il Is just
within the range Of possibility ihuIhs BAL
las llER.Ln might be tribe sulky, IL mol
elamorous. w will not undertake to set,
ile these detivaie questions. But, as Il H.
We do say, In all seriousness that We can
see 40 harm aud eau see much good TO re-
suit to the State from the building Of ihcs,
roads aud from the start we have been In
favor OF them, without knowing where
particularly, they would be located. We
do not say that We approve Of the means
said to have been used 10 secure the char
tiers OF these roads, but We do say that We
can see nothing wrong in .he charter.
themselves, and think that honest men
having the welfare OF Texas at heart, might
have voted for them not oaly without con-
sure but with approval. IL the last Leg.
islniure did anything good At all, Of a gen.
eral nature, il was in relation to these
important railroads. As TO its being q
question ofdemucracy, this is all lummery
II has oihing TO do with democracy. The
old democracy o. Jackson's time was op.
posed, on democratic principles, against
internal improvements on the part of the
General Government, but never to State
encouragement. Leading and noble dem
ocrats, like Calhoun and Gen. llayne and
u host of others we're the fast friends o.
State impro 'emen;s. so our Waxaiachie
brothers need not bother their worthy
souls about our faith or falling from
grace" Allow us to suggest that editor,
stand just as & cd chance OF getting tc
Heaven on iuilronds us their fathers did
on the old corduroy turnpikes. We hav,
only This 10 ndd. The grumbling of til,
Ilouston Telegraph is rather surprising tc
us. Why this stNunch advocate of rail
roadside say nothing particularly Of the
Cenirnl-shouldj join with the State Ga
zette in its bitter warfare against the
Southern Pacific, needs some explanation
Was i right for the State of Texas, before
and since the Wnr, to aid the construction
of the Central Railroad, and is it wrong
now TO do the same thing for roads, equally
important for developing all our esources:
We wait for nm ans yer.
| -