New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1871-06-10


in life-his health, and the welfare OF his
family-would be more secure. Although
there are laws enough, in the wisdom OF
legislation, to correct this evil, the objection
seems to be they are not carried out.
-S---
BOARD OF POLICE CoMMIssIoNERs.-The
following are the proceedings of the Board
of Police Commissioners at their last meet
ing:
j. P. Martin, patrolman, of the fourth
precinct, ON the charge OF neglect of duty,
sitting down and asleep, pleaded guilty,
and was suspended from duty for five days.
J. II. Low, patrolman, of the harbor pre-
cinct. on the charge of neglect of duty, off
his beat, was found guilty, and dismissed
from the force.
D. Healy. patrolman, of the first pre-
cnct, on the charge of neglect OF duty, in
toxication, was suspended from duty for
five days
T. Adams. patrolman, of the harbor post,
on the charge of neglect, had his boat tied
up. was suspended from duty five days.
most. on the charge of conduct unbecOming
an officer, was found guilty and dismissed
the force.
ID. Whalen, patrolman, of the sixth pre-
cinct, on the charge of neglect OF duty;
sitting down and asleep, was suspended
from duty for five days.
E. A. Duffy, patrolman OF the sixth pre-
cinct, on the charge of neglect OF dHty,
string down. was Suspended from duty tor
five days.
7 Shields. patrolman of the sixth pre-
cinct. on the charge of neglect OF duty, of
his beat, was reprimanded.
r l.. Desdunes, patrolman of the sixth
nrecinct on the charge of disObedience or
orders. forfeited one days pay:
r. Bridges, patrolman OF the sixth pre-
cinct. on the charge of neglect OF duty,
sitting down, was found guilty, and dropped
from the rolls.
precinct, on the charge of intoxication and
conduct unbecoming an officer, was dis
missed the force.
]. Knox, patrolman of the fifth precinct,
on the charge of neglect OF duty. CONT
nued.
w. Rupp, patrolman of the fifth precinct,
on the charge of neglect of duty IN being
under the influence of liquor, was found
guilty and dismissed the service.
Thomas Hudson, patrolman OF the NTH
precinct, on the charge of neglect of duty in
sitting down, was found guilty and one
DAVIS pay forfeited.
A. Demassellier, patrolman OF the fourth
precinct, on the charge of neglect OF duty,
living down and asleep, was suspended
for ten days.
+. bahncke, sergeant third precinct, on
the charge of disobedience o. orders Ad
visement.
r. Cheevers, patrOlman second precinct,
on the charge neglect of duty, sitting down
and asleep, was suspended for five days.
H. Gerdes, patrolman of the second pre-
cinct. on the charge of neglect OF duty, sit
ting down and asleep, was suspended fol-
five days.
J. Garlck, patrolman of the second pre-
cinct, on the charge of neglect OF duty, IN
failing to answer corporaFs call rap, was
fined one days pay.
n. Haines, special patrolman OF the sec
ond precinct, on the charge of neglect OF
duty, off his beat, was reprimanded.
-Four patrolmen of the first precinct, on
the charge of being absent from drill. were
reprimanded.
t. F. Fisher, patrolman of the first pre-
cinct. on the charge of neglect of duty
sitting down and asleep, was found guilty
and dismissed the force.
j. E. Hogan, patrolman of the first pre-
cinct, on the charge of neglect OF duty
and sitting down, was suspended from
duty for three days.
William Wicker and n. Bahen, patrol,
men of the first precinct, were fined ont
days pay.
j. Mckenzie, charge dismissed.
The board then adjourned.