The Orangeburg news. [volume] (Orangeburg, S.C.) 1867-1875, 1871-06-03
IAN apology.

communication. That it will amuse
some, Of them we have no doubt.
The writer certainly shows himself open
tothes MelLdirected attack Of cur friend,
"0LbsTBRj sin his thoughtless and silly
reply sAlllpublic officers should expect
the criticism Of the public Their reply
to this criticism, when exercised, should
be.ip explanation of themselves, and not
inithis syllabub Dalevolence all around.
Our correspondent, "OLDsTER," will
doubtless take care of himself next
week.in We have no doubt that the jury
irp this "Court of Justice" are intelli.
gent, men, and honest, but what, pray,
have, they got to do with the Trial JUS
sleetu'r i9r rsc
eAndnow to another point. Mr.. Pohl
in'dhis letter asserts in substance that
thefe arc Trial Justices who have swim
died the County. AS public journal.
istwe demand proof of this assertion.
H,anybedy has been playing cheating
gaineictowards the State or County, in
the capacity of Trial Justice, tie public
has Fight to know who they are, and
demand proof for conviction. And now
asa,Mr. gPohl is sworn officer of the
States and consequently bound by said
oath or'obligation to protect her rights,
ana more especially those of the County
in;which he holds his appointment, it is
his highest and most imperative duty to
bring these parties, who have been play
ing a double game in the role of the
TrialnJustice, to condign and mcrited
punishment. The assertion is made in
SO many words that somebody's course
would not stand the test Of the square;
and as the onas proJandi rests upon Mr.
Polls shoulders, the public, to whom: he
has voluntarily given the Intelligence,
will certainly have a very curious opin.
ion, of him, unless he assists them in
yhaYingthese swindlcrs brought to the pro-
per place. If it is at all probable that
Trial Justice who has only held his po-
sition for few months, could have had
the State indebted to him in the pretty
little SUN of s'several thousand dollars"
by turning things to account" it is
highly necessary that rigid examna-
tion should speedily take place in this
branch of our judicial department
A word or two more and we will give
the letter.
- It never has nor will it ever benefit
person, who, gets himself into newspaper
b controversies, to drag others into it. As
1--WE said in the onset, replies to criticisms
should always be to explain away the
cause for criticism, or in exculpation of
the acts Of the party attacked Whole
!, sale ipsinuations and inuendoes, against
"a parties who have no interest in contro-
ivcrsy, invariably serves to bring out
bitterness from quarter VIII :re it other
WISE might have slept forever we vol
nnteer this advice for what it is worth
,cour experience has taught us its great
d value
NE Here is tho letter. We print it rcy-
Jatim ct tHteratin,, &peNatim etpuactuatim:
I's;ll T's s;ll;;::;;I:.'i;;.S, 6. O.,
,sJ az, May Goth, 1871.
7od, Mr. Editor Permit me through your
4 columns to reply to a communication
% signed Oldster, which appeared in your
issue Of the 10Th inst. l shall endeavor
b to be very brief, by making short cut,
I, knowing if made iii the right place, i.
will prove just as fatal Now sir to the
point; / will not consume time with
! this fellow, by discussing the Court of
! Saneho Panza, for that is q subject of
too much magnitude for his brain, that
%, il, if he eyer had any, which is very
doubtful, but for the stake of argument,
~ let US admit that he had sum, is it then
q not probable that he lost what little he