New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-04-06


rsiwsy-I who hards-s railway rd by SIC state
with hundred millions Of ca with more than 300 rope nnae
GSrins the whole Of Administration int day there
WIZ ,s 90 yoa tbnS in ic o. r place II ,hS State to
any, 81 E the emu q TIE e rinG Ne COMPANY
from Ts,osnrs aS , "a & ee s, s nc" go %
pointing receiver Of The Whole property all fraHc Of The VI
Supne Court than b,n stands higher. se, cannot e
under such an administration ofheaw lfsa irs odeI 0
President President freaner Controller and Co.n 81,
c6eye Comsny would have bsnlapt a. three Ss
iep back The Ccpsny 6o1eh Is attorney e,ehy s.I;' II.
notice Of appearance on Ramsey ani ,,cr"cy i. Appearing
T e cou p5o e %hS ls ST os AZ, Asi T%g
appointment which tbs sap?ou0IG s p tl cir,
counsel for HE Compsny get an injunction 70 Say
him o. acting in the uni an li ON Rssy on the 26h
and vet sppesrs y lie @ The 2ih -g and G ne se
ard ssryca these odeTi o. C cave notice Of before
The same Judge had sntd MS r part oT co 70 90
Delhi IN nisr travel 20 miles Over ,hs snow ana s IT, S En-
r yiaItpS the n0rcie those cnn'agees e ~; ~ op
care 'nhog -01 ah tbs e b.. q sht
ion +, h' ig9Ss7 Wien %'t T .sr ei De- r.
sfer his motion reh to cooim thee ofiT' ~, .r
e,es t tool r, b osHs 6iS r Ton Ne lave Been done 90
n reference The ere found the damage 10 be 4@O but
S6a came before tie Gee, Tenn 1ey r,dgea ,e a% n
80 Delhi in mdsner to argue this mo. pa The qgeai1n
i9SyS so 9S T S Tshs he ro decide ore way other
70 say whe would worll not eni q Ana e'' NheI ue
ofbis Company that particular ilona' do 6 what wa. done y
S hun over tie stat, JaiSe give oocens
that flie h pot be Ofa avail nnai'rrr
In regard to the aosci for expenses rete the SPECIAL nor
S iSt i ne amount as must DS be settled By evidence
The next motion. made 10y the Hon. Lyman Treman,
was in the case OF Ramsey ag The Erie Railway Com
pany, being appeal OF the appellant Ramsey) from
an order of the General Term in the first department
fuiio Ia "A
statement OF facts In the
Specsl Term foo tie trial ori.suc hell in NesYok before jas
te F,nad che stoye Ssg'e vas move % al 81. i.,i
denied The pauI wholly aired for rtI fatng hen
dave ror TO Die Jay wien aid motion rle which time The
attorney who hai pfoFgtl " Nm, on os5 Sp'tG @ S
lie m7 Win COSTS end swing TIE plaintiff eae at that time 10
SPECIAL f TeTn bc % Ja;e Brs open he let IT a,
oI $s@;Is The combat Who s sf 1fs c a. 9 a.
1870 Diminishing the Plaintiff comIa AMI giving peutas ia,ra
sd H. AID the complaint r,sord Che tctgdrns rruloa ead
from ore The Gesc Tenn and after M ai hsd been
Mr. Ramsey had Left The courtroom the coanse o ia defendant moved
oa uD, the decision dftc appeal which ss red by coose
mourning and Justice lg"hn di'scrirs and from this o'e tie
The roa al The Erie Raiyay Comgaay respondent were
to the eaed that Che order US ro pTeae to n Cour Of ANe'
ems Sn ~, ,' C 't T'e +, s8d Ic ,oti Of The ap.
% Ier5ng IN e Ga,rl Term l mol ris urrr f present. agresI
TIE questions might oom ~ by an by but would be premature to
The last Of the motions was made 10y the Hon. Lyman
Treman on behalf Of c respondents In the OF Fisk
lr appellant. ag The Albany and susquchanna Railroad
Company
Tis sr,a nom order Of tc neral !n Of tie Third Ne
be Srcc lcu sg Bs1dl changing e place Of IRA ron New.
The place u t rsmel in TIE complaint ~ ih, Voaay Of Ne"
ao De SaS1 Is asS s1s ,e. % t
s by ~ plan ih on 'at .l-a N.he u, d. u. Az par
defendant eErc I'D not ON IN ne TS7 ri aii; a. vel a,
us7 a. one o. the eor, holding appointment Of
ne CemgoI Coal Of AP 1 tfio,e ID G int
pls.tf AID wholly hostile e other dtli'nt ed 10 10 nam
zen ~ to Al e ks Coi AMI h. sf-s cons, Having
S SsSte Rns 1 Hf e change. 10 fer.cr end DO 3o of
entered an ore bat regular aOicy tic
glsi.s s}.4 70 lie Ie Of the spgr.ae cort AID nd
' and al. en- IN gro1 NJ note If rpaes, sd Been ei
cei the General Tenn Of e Tint D'srg,lt W., not hePoPer
FIJI DGme.t and n sPlc PePl II VA, acre. an s I
ri Tr4 Of The Ih' Department sSei e appeal "ia ll' P1'ua
slpeas hoa that onier here
The argument on this latter Was about 10 be pro
ceeded with when Justice Grover, who had been ex-
auniug the point: in the case, rcmaikcd
The Court of Appeals ha- already decided that where
order is made changing the place Of iral, aud an up
he Department TO which they directed. aud he heard
In that. This was rightly heard in the Ihih Dlartment
and tie Third Department, think, rightly dismissed
the appeal ;mt that tAcir oider is rot appeaablc "a this
Coart
The decision, ~ u 10 other ca .cs were served.
RIVAL CHARITIIS-A WILL CAIElI%-LY DRAWN.
An action has been brought in the Superior
Court by the 81. Iukos Home for INDECENT Chi,tian
Females against William c. Wetmor6 ana Clerborue
Ferris executors Of the last will and testament of John
Alatyne, and the Association for the Relief Of Respect
able Aged and INDECENT Females e. iu possession Of
s25 COO alleged 60 have been bequc ited lay the vii aHd
codc Of John Asyne. who died June .. 1sc-;5O00 by
the will and s9e0OO by the codc Tie words used in the
will and codic The society Tor the Relief Of Indi
gent Aged Females in the CITY OF New York" The
executors were about pay over tie money 70 he society
having its statutory name "Ihe Association for the
this sut brought 10 resist the paymcut s.. Lakes
Home claims that their Association WAS meant ly the
words OF the WILL because ~ The te~t3tor EpSco
and therefore The lcgacics must have hren njrDdcd
Tor an Episcopal institution ~ IN, testator hclped the
Witch would induce such disposition OF The pOucy and
81 the name used in tie VIII and cOicil did not Apply 10
The defense is that beside thc evidence Of The name in
the will and codic, the following faces snow the tesa-
Society;
William wseors one o,le e,,eocr ard ,, oa friend Il lc Tesla
tor dev te will On gone h. Office 90 tucohi the tt
toi tIoGgi Sh him wr'n m .. me easi' s".' 70 wieh he
G We title eorlaed ia ne LIST 1cnt noticing particulars whether
NE ME, s,1. soIse' a Mr. Wsmog f,d is Wien tas
81 4. i lS, W. IS9s , 70: M,ot9s q e,h Old s @s'
wen o he on LsHe. scce, ref, rs 20 DE dcSrnn sho
mtCnisd to DO Wei b; hem ' bis nS we , Srr m d and
he gave those ge' on her account, The def hasn further caed
whom would bsye been ntc sut hi domestic affair. tho
scd, intended he ee II IVES c ,icuj t on Seis ofde
tue iesistcr meant the 81 Luts Home woa nos hys % tou.s
those specie wOri.
Decision reserved.
FRAUD SOMEWHERE.
peculiar ease came up III the Special