The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1871-10-27
THE PARSEE LUNACY CASE.
Bomanjee Byrawjse Cclah-Opinion Of Judge
Daly-1he Psrsee To Be Sent
Back to Bombay.

This exceedingly interesting case the particulars
OF which have, from time TO time, appeared In the
columns OF the HERALD has at length eliminated
IN an exhaustive and able opinion by Judge DAILY, Of
the Court Of Common Pleas.
The Judge in stating his opinion, refers at great
length and with much particularly to the facts Of
the CASE He says:-
for the transfer Of Bomanlee Byram3ee Coah unatc,
india Il: Question the o. I Grant
@ III 70 s %
OF very novel character will be necessary drst to
which sssfss ss.:s
s aaa sss aDa sn.om in hs
IIed with wife and children natives Of Bombay,
sI: FER: ~
possessed Calcutta, whence proceeded .
a.d e nut Msy s 70 I % ypSn h.
AZ 1a s ana SsrS sss
giving as address room IS rif.h xsenas Ho, eH
TS% this hotel Be be. removed red n short time 70 The
stss. ;sss H sane n
he was total there being no one here Who knew
snyang aSp g. he vas n: de-
mani 70 e sTi:h subject her Britannia Majesty:
3: s.ss,s
% Ss
H. S.r:.
& apfs.n:
e
haa been for some years resident OF Bombay, was
ne sRd cBs IL aa
aoas e
fer the future custody and care Of him to Major Constable
At Flushing where he is now under medical and treat
s,s The s ys as that be
n S OF % sd9 for s1 %as S
G Of e s s ss1s,
containing the gold having the meanwhile been opened the
rsncy deposited in trust company in this City, to the
credit Of lie BY whom withheld and who
give j. up This um and in gold in addition thereto,
sneasns n ali A 70 ss @ 81
e and ss sna
annual Interest of per cent action brought by
ne
United o States which, successful may add about
Of Inquiries tina, colah native Of
A.I ~ liz
ws qed m AND 10 to sSars
person and estate under which, however no action
Consul 2: RomSay , N i from
Court on cr behalf FOR The allowance "pF certain
sum e meet her present expenses, and for fixed
Children This sppsas.en k.yns been heard, The he
pending commission having despatched Bombay b,,
that the Court might have legal evidence the necessary
proper allowance which commission has not yet returned
n9s AZ, S s%ff RSi BE- s pDnsas
power OF attorney from Heera Baee the wife, authorizing
him. her behalf TO take charge of the and property
and the mn pa sS % for ana h, to SSm'a
her name, as might be necessary, Mr.. wadis &c.
S.nsy 81 e ss s :. nf sspg that
should delivered him authorized agent and at
be propy was Opposed ~ the British Wee ~
through his counsel formal protest made by The
effect that Mr.. wadIa was not a proper person with
whom entrust either the person the property The APP
was denied for which have already been assigned
but the 10 transfer Coah from the jurisdiction OF
this Court rests upon entirely different grounds.
The Judge then proceeds to review the various
the case, for sending Coah back TO Bombay, and to
consider whether the Court has power 10 remove
him beyond its own jurisdiction In doing this the
Judge refers deliberately to the law bearing on such
questions, and Gnally decides lhus:--
Major Constable having consented take charge of Coah
my Instructions thai he shall take him by the next
steamer which leaves here, with
Pae,hc 70 San francisco That from San francisco he
from thence by steamer to bombay, ana, upon his
arrival a, Bombay. place him in the institution referred
had charge Of him At tue institution At Flushing shall
20 with him and continue the same care and attention he
has hitherto bestowed until he placed IN the institution in
Mayor Constable upon HIS arrival in Bombay will mmcd
lab they OF them apply for the ap
poiotmen. Of committee at the earliest possible period
himself 10 the proper judicial tribunal judge within the
urdclop and VIII bring back wan him duly authenticated
evidence Of the appointment and of the asylum or insti
The final order may be settled upon one days notice.
Buckham, Smales 4 Walker, or counsel for petit
TONER Edwards ( 0dell. OF counsel for committee;