The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1871-08-26
SUPREME CoURT-cHAM5saS.
The Bill for Iron Work for the New Cssrs
House.

The Bill for Iron Work for the New Cssrs
House.
Before Judge Sutherland.
The People, 6c., rS. CONNOLLY Gc.-This case came
up for settlement OF the order IN compliance with
the recent decision OF the Court directing that Q
mandamus issue either against the Comptroller or
the Court House Commissioners for payment OF
S3i 1876 AZ, balance, with interest OF unpaid bill Of
the Messrs Cornell for Iron work for the new Court
House. An order was submitted by Mr.. Cornens
counsel directing mandamus 10 be issued forth
with against the Commissioners, directing
them TO make requis!tion ON the Comp.
,roller, nstr 1Nnd hm , to pay the required
last Legislature, entitled "An to make provision
for the local government OF the city and county Of
Mr.. O'GoRMAN. Counsel to the Corporation, OBJ
jected TO the order on tho ground that the Comp
troer had no right TO pay money 10 Mr.. Cornell.
and could only pay money over to the Commas
thar me Comntroller would not nav IL over on reuu
sltlon OF the Commissioners
Mr.. ROBINSON, on behalf OF Mr.. Cornell. urged thas
neither OF the GROUNDS OF objection was tcnaDle.
1hc Court took the papers.
Extra Hotel Fill and Extra Trouble for .
Landlord.
O,tue Nichols rs. george W. Hunt.-The plaintiff
boarded for several weeks aI the Westmoreland
HOTEL OF which the defendant is proprietor. she paid
her board bills regularly, and the day after she Left
her brother for her trunks. which the defendants
| ~
| twenty-five dollars Tor extra board and damage to
furniture was paid. The plaintiff refused to pay
bill and the defendant detained the trunks, where
| upon the former brought suit In repevin to re-
cover them. The case came up on motion to
| strike out the defendants answer sham as
| setting forth tnat the trunks were detained on
| landlords lien. The Court decided that there was
no such llen and ordered the answer 10 ne stricken
out and the case sent before Sherins jury to assess
damages.
| Business Men Have Some Rights that Church,
men Are Bound Respect.
| Jacob Sti,ser Ell al. rs. The Congregation Poel
| ZeCe.-ThIs was o motion for an injunction. The
plaintiffs are tea dealers the ground door OF the
| famous nor:hwesterly corner OF Eighth avenue and
Twenty ninth street. IN this CITY, the top moor OF
which building is the headquarters Of the Protest.
ant association VINO were the innocent cause OF the
late 18th OF July riot. and was formerly occupied
by the modern Spritualist5 and table-tipperss
ana the second moor Is used by the defendants
rs place OF worship. The plalntldS nave num-
Der OF tea signs the outside VI the building. which
the defendants object to aud threaten to take down
unless the plaintiffs remove them which they refuse
| another religious community recently caused the
| arrest and imprisonment OF number OF poor He
brew talOrs for running their sewing machines on
| a Sunday In their own apartments adjoining the
church euiice, and the defendants seemed deter
mined To remove the signs In question. The plaintlM
| became alarmed at the apparent entertainments OF
the churchmen and took the offensive, and obtained
q temporary Injunction against the defendants with
| an order 10 show cause why 1t should not be made
permanent. M. Moses for plaintiffs.
| Decisions.
| IL w. Judd us. James Boyd et at.-M0ton denied,
| without costs.
| Thomas b. Perlfeld Us. James AZ. Mdnhers.-M0s
| ton denied, with leave to renew.
| John McdfnSie u.s. Francis La Sdge.-Same.