New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-02-02
4 RAILROAD FIGHT.

OPEN pPTURE BETWEEN RAILROAD COMPANIES
OF THE THROUGH ROUTE TO WASHINGTON.
The controversy between tho Baltimore and
Ohio Railroad Company and the Camden aod Amboy
phiadelpbia wilmington, and Baltimore, and New
Jersey Companies has resulted In An open rupture ana
the suspension Of oil relations between tho later Com
panies and the Baltimore and Ohio. Tho NewJersey
Railroad Company yesterday discontinued tho
sale OF through tickets 10 the South by the
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. IN consequence
OF the alleged refusal Of thai Company
70 accept the Same for fare from Newfok ana
New England passengers that is charged Tor ocai pas
seneers between Baltimore and Washington. The Now
Jersey Companies effected arrangements yesterday ior
sending their Southern passengers By the "Bay Inc
from Baltimore and passengers for the Southwest ad
West are TO be sent over the Pennsylvania Railroad inc
Baltimore and Ohio threatens vengeance by giving its
support to the Air Line Railroad bill before Congress
A. l.. Dennis, President OF the New-JerseY Railroad
Company; VIM II. Gatzrncr, President Of the Camden
and Amboy and Isaac inckey, President Of the Pha-
delphia Wilmington, and Baltimore Company, baVs
lpftly signed circular containing the following afBu-
nhnt against the Baltimore and Ohio Company ..,.
has b 50 Of which sum he Baltimore Ohio Rao'i Company
Ia, 2I S,s pd SPS I ni l rG @ ~
gliding po tar ., 20 per cs4' Of ae p's,lser re- P 81 ne
has many demanded ani reoyd e Io'l ant Pic Of -
leaving Pc railroad Gre including he oapen taE 81 a.
pay eaploa he STATE Of s.rys oy Ls' sor;; = from
all until h ami from New Tors ana nisls %
until tbs date cptlt0H tat formerly pl up"h e
Gs--iOk AM Wahn passengers By tie Phehl'' wilmington
RAILROAD Conn Be state VI DtFa On .ur I
Of November 1G2 the PalsdcPh wilmington tni Baltimore
Company declined pay this and on tie sam, dy casd
On or abort pronounced th Maryland cspls
The Baltimore aul Ohio Railroad COMPANY ~ One De
its 0c8 heH thoF snd
Washington tie 81 % instead Of 81 ~ as Lepr ne
Companies Of Baltimore expected that the Bliumos ana ono %
road would maze the reduction on IL proportion 9 &
New.Yok Washington Gcaet following ne example 81 Le tlile
end Baltimore Railroad Company 900 riw cifclm
me-, In 1865 Baltimore 8ni Ohio Railroad COMPANY have 70
this day pers.ienty refused 10 Ills 10 accept in' 81 ne @
es long since and still 81 o. ticket Instead OF an tbtcA
Ard allow the Baltimore Ohio Company cShtan rate Tor horse
er in the Baltimore Gul rs f local rate bel on
he Wa.hngon Branch, while tue other COmpns would reee' 81
cents an their aggregated and Woli pay ron nee
reduced rates charges Of the Puus Railroad COMPANY ann
Railroad Company the Philadelphia an'e' 'i over
three miles.
thereof 70 -ltuor3 sni Ohio Company . improper eve f
horse rrce Baltimore beside DO, m local rate esr 80 cn of
while Companies. us le 60 y 81 ahs n fA1-'
phia would 20 cents - than their eribe oci re
Thee Companies have regrosed the Baltimore and ono iid
COMPANY sell them the Wellington eul bHho V'he ny '
m rate o Al public 0r t travellers may re SUI
p then Washington through u New lof. and tres be s'
the psyEg ell tb"e once ana t' reiS as o,'
refused hy n Bali more an. Ohio Railroad COMPANY.
The Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company peTssentY speaks OF -
collect defrc reduction N iiie N 'tl' ony
ofi, Of fares. While III has honestly p' hlet' ~.
public unerstanis be- n clltston tax w ~ cent? 90 ~"
au Washington psnyers Il EOr charge IA 10 e'r' 20 i'
some thsn hitherto.