The daily phoenix. [volume] (Columbia, S.C.) 1865-1878, 1871-06-14
TMJ:iks:4aaE5,2AaRiA R:H:jTO
FSfaIan AnaiqEs

no!ea french actress, is married to o
Rio. yAanrao, May i as: as,a LISBON, Il ON,
June 70. The Regent Of HIHSil is in.
vested with fall powers during the alb
senoe pt the Emperor. Senator Jasquari
has received the appointments; as Brazil.
ian Minister Of War. Tie BRAZILIAN
Goverhhent presented to The Chapb beeraa
q. bill for the. emancipation OF all slaves
belonging to the Grown. "a. I, .S,H ,a!..
LoNDoN; June IA, The Communists
OF Olerkenwell, London. have resolved
to hold q meeting Monday night, in
Hyde Faf4z; TO protest againsi e1iradi-,
tion. JiIXO q iFsS i;it.ti': iii., la
Harvest :p's6spsets IN Franco and Pras-
SerS hasssa1 Msun pes.ans q
abundant yield: ',a.t-
1ntHA Commons. Gladstone, relying
toh a1aatioh, said the, sixth article Of
the treaty Of Washington,.proh the
use 81 neutral ports for renewal or auu-
mentation of arms and supplies 70 belii-
gerenfs only when exported in the ordi,
nary .oonrse ioA commerce. This, ha
said. was'the understanding 6n'the part
OF President Grant and Minister HohAnck.
1t was 1nderatood, however, that on
presentation Of. the rule for acceptance
by other powers, that:'a statetnons ION
this point should be clear. - !:
GladatonA, stated he had received the
assent OF the United States Government
to proposal to submit three PRINCIPLES
OF tho treaty to European powers for
their acceptance. /, He believed the pro-
epeotiye' advantage to England would be
immense! He concluded by fpraisinR
the tone Of America throughout tlie ne2
gotiations.
Ia the House. OF Lords, Russell. in
moving an address to the Grown against
ratification Of the treaty of Washington.
unless ,arbittators were bound only by
International and British laws existing
at the time oflthe American war, argued
that 2sherWiae England might apply one
rule and Ameripa another, and apbitra-
tors still another. The treaty will be
demanded toIseoure peace; but IL was q
dangerous precedent, aud On unwise ne
glect OF dnty Of Great Britain to her
American colonies, whose fishery inte-
reets were sacrificed, for, the treaty was
one-sidad sven about fisheries. He as
serted that Great Britain had observed
all obligations of neutrality during. the
war, and quoted from the Blue Books
to prove his Insertion, and soo1ted the
idea OF negligence 'bn the part of the
Goyernmept,,s.I In conclusion. he said
the treaty Sacrificed English prestige: Il
sacrificed oil for peace. mn
Granville snid he accepted the disous-
sion. but not Russeil's motion. He ex-
planned the circumstances attending tie
negotiations of the treaty, and declared
it's terms honorable and ADVANTAGEOUS
fox Oanada; while he regretted the ex-
oluslon OF Canadian: claims, growing out
Of Fenlan Invasion, he!could not help
seeing thatinternational gain was ;ncaf-
cn1able. ,fr., H m.
Earl Derby hoped Russell would with
draw his Inotfop for tlra Rejection Of the
treaty, which America would now take
as o direct insult. HeSdid bot begrndRa
apology, but regretted The ret.csrsnti6n
rule. because it put. England on trial
after. her admission of regret for events
under Mws. passed ten years after the
events occurred. Personally, he accept
ed the treaty as IN accomplished faot.
taking evil with good. He hoped no
pressure would be applied to Canade to
Interfere. with the exercise Of her free
VIII. He rejolced with everybody that
the irritating difference was ended.
Earl de Grey and Ripon defended the
tsfPty And the conduct OF negotiations.
Ha scouted the imputation Of lamb like
msakness of British Commissioners be-
fore the shenrers It is true they de.
sired to conciliate the Americans, 'but
nothing more, Several of the proposals
made bH the Americans had been persis-
tentiy declined, although they we're not
prsposteEous. An apology for the eacape
OF she Alabama made the conclusion Of
a good treaty possible. The settlement
ol"pentfality questions. was q vast gain,
rs neutrality was England s future policy.
Omission Of any provision for reoiproci-
ty was unimpoftant in view Of the pro-
gress free trade was making ia Annerico.
He defended the articles. Goncarnine the
fisheries, on She gfound That Canada was
really benefited by thsm.. .:a,..,,ar .s!.,.
The Earl Of Kimberly shil Canada exl
citgd favor ;for the treaty. .,f.s
nofd Cajrls Deprecated ,Rnssell's iaoa
tioA, The treaty was ns binding now as
if itahaai been ratified, although it was
badly drawn, and obliged England to
submit TO principles hitherto unknown
to.the ootntry. yC>
The Lord glaneellor sustained the
trnXt 1, 'is~t:f SI.StSE h. E t5i:N's,. n