New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-10-27
show that Mr. Han or MI Connolly received any part OF

In reply to this question: the reporter was
of the associate counsel Of the Controers once
evdeScS SHOWING Sa Mr. Ma Sr Connolly
other person popularity supposed be connected win
EFf Psts pub
Associate Councils one Of the SornS ynr ouesOn
1t would be unprOfessopal for me TO answer IT, % our
Reporter-Then YOU will not tell me Tres jun
knowledge such evidence is or Is not IN eAlSVehee'
Associate Counsel-NO, Sir; will not
reporter also hold with Mayor Hall the following
conversation:
Reporter-Mayor Hall, have you THE TRIBUNE Of
Mayor Ha-No, Sir, and am not likely TO- for 1t "a
paper never read. ..-... A
contains about The in checks Of Garvey Inger
named In the afBdsvits
Reporter-Win you allow me to explain the matter 10
Mayor Hall-Certanly. ,,.o-
The reporter Of TIE o nm RUSE Of Yesterday
morning asking evidence ineulpatng others haa NOT
S1 for a RS and Ss
TO the connection OF the Mayor with tne 40 in'er'n
saw to THE TRIBUNE for me that shall be glad 1t
will publish the world that received every dollar OF
Reporter-Dont you want to reconsider that answeri
Mayor Hall" I do not II The TRIBUNE has anything
TO soU sny at the they
Reporter-Do you know whether Mr.. Connolly received
Mayor HALL only answer for myself; Mr.. Connolly
must answer for himself
WARDS OTHER CoNFEDERATES TO BE
TRACKED - MR.. O'CONoR's ASSISTANTS AT
WORK.
In the summary Of the exhibits accompany
ing the affidavit Of Samuel j. Tlden, published in yester
days TRIBUNE, reference is made to checks Of the diff
fcrent Ring tools and tradesmel which were paid to
parties traced" This would to indicate that
NYI antkh
had been pursued far enough that 1t was their
intention the receivers of the other twothirds
of the plumber taken from the City Treasury.
Mr.. Tilden, however, explains the absence OF
the names of other well-known Ring operators
from the af1davits and exhibits on the ground that
he aud his associates did not the facilities for
vesigatng their transactions and the that they
successful with the accounts is because
Tweed and woodward both kept accounts with the
National Broadway Bank, and their transactions as re-
corded in the banks books could easily be compared and
determined. With regard to the other members OF tho
Ring such facilities existed and it was desirable to
bring matter before the Courts once the nvest
cation having developed sufficiently conclusive evidence
Of fraud, they determined to their facts OF once
The statements published that largo amounts
drawn from the City Treasury frequently on forged
warrants by Z. A. Woodward and that portion OF the
money thus lched say onefOurth was deposited In the
Broadway National Bank to the credit Of VIM NJ Tweed,
the threefourths remaining according to these
counts in the name Of E. A. Woodward. To suppose
that latter permitted, for instance to retain
from single days stealings" OF tSs623 II 30 large
sum $40 2s4 a. while the Chief sachem only received
&c. is simply preposterous Who received the bal
auce Of the money after deducting Woodwards share
ia an question which has yet deed even
Mr.. Tilden's ability in hunting up circumstantial
evidence.
The secret perhaps lies in the fact that Mr. Tweed
kept his pc rsOna account in the Broadway Bank In
question: while the other members OF the bang pauen
lied other banks.
IT. therefore those who pursuing these hyestgs-
could ascertain in what banks Connolly Bweeny
Hall and kept their accounts and could secure
an examination OF the books of such banks since the
the nefarOus ctions In question
the parties not traced might be found It
is that an from the Court in any OF the
suits now going against members OF the Ring would
be sufficient and ought TO be attanabe.
as Mr.. Tdens colleagues concerned, but Will con-
tnue with view TO obtaining sufficient evidence against
all others engaged in the frauds.