The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1871-04-20

my ouce Cafornia street. for the purposs Of
her September showed her The balance and paid her
she took tine thanked me kindly appeared cheerful
woman.
than other person. reason should
;n.s her more than any other person did business with
TO Mr. Campbell-Have the receipt with she signed
TO Mr. Cook she had some business with mo before that
campbell oMered the receipts IN evidence and called the
since or 1855 Mr dsampbe if'i then ASKED s
% % ssssse''a with tho general
mo
had crsendsn ruined her re-.
sy % e
puation for chastity badha point OF fact she had
e &c osn s By
s. was s tho
geiher with other physical causes produced insanity at the
Pending the argument Of counsel the recess
AFTERNOON SESSION.
At two O'Clock the court met again and counsel
to the admissibility OF testimony as to the
REPUTATION ron CHASTITY.
denos under the Of The could not
in that SGnS ss s d mot Of ~ their
cused Testimony offered their defence tended influences
s s he and s1a 70 ss e y M ss,
% she. e
@ ao a ~ that
s. a1 81 % that
81 n.sn Ia on ss q S &C.
e: ssps.
on @. shcT that
harm ~ cpS..ndss hey ing sSs
af} ssa 70 hf
uner Rs 81 sS .y WORD q @
went to show ner IN, integrity.
Mr. Cook then nterposed the following objections to tho
Faon The ground that time had been given which
sssgETha such evidence not admissible as tending to
Ti,d-fhs. defence offered no evidence Of Tia. cha
FoyA-That is not competent rebuttal s not re.
FVA-That the evidence does NEE. any issue in the
case or tend to establish any issue.
material and that must be to her acquaintance
Campbell said they proposed show anterior and
The overued the objections which the defendant
excepted
Mr. csmpbe-4re You scSuainsed with the general repu
November a. Irrespective OF any connection her
witness-I am acquainted BY hearsay not BY my
Mr. campbsll~wha. was it-sood or bad, $3.50.
Same objections and So same ruling
ri :as:
during the Frazer sssnsmsn sssrd her rspus
@
: er spssilas he Sssi
~ ssI
% SsS ss: =;
times OF other heard nothing but what have stately
sS nV: Is. %
have nsan
Pas. made rattle, ,ug,. remarks Is there ladies in
The noticing The e .ss wnss: to state
@ rass I've
@ 'S%s ,sa X ss q Il r. Ss.
being tstermnsd to remain and not appear timd.
not :
s
,s psPss da moi .vnc. hostility to Mr. Fail.
-, c. z; ]. soSII: 80. =. =.
ss here sf4 Il o Sesos
mex. IN sae! i vsn. City April ssy iss 4
general spason fst oasG.
relations with Mr. Crenden. II was bad ams objection
stat, any specific acts during 1868 or 1854 rela
this stage Mira Lane mother Of the acc'ed. became
Mr. o oSt Sb.eea % ss aaeon as
relevant and nmatera ana that acts can in no case be
Objection sustained
Crosse1amined been here week; am milling and
mining don't own mine own portion q some stock in
sss ssaz e New s o ns
mill is situated half mile from wa:hoe City, Avery Is my
seters that leased MIL cayson The estate o.
Lev Hate TIA. was r. iss had two ye,m then Ven.
SGs: sssRR % ss
:s ~
deputy E,' y
s e.: q @ tG as ss:a a
&: sgrPPs o
d. e g1f mG ao and
m., aOp ain5 hs .ss gp there = the time know hs
N.Y. aoss ias. where 4: rse%:d ,S:ni ~ .r,as
To-: fshos House and on srsss heard PIE he
mark Of Mr. FAIR; when :hs h,ss game % vrgna CITY
& as. ,s Fl.
Reside nov r. San fTsnel.co occupation IL that of
ss sn ys e. S s y s 1 sns ..s.
reputation chastity scmmsnsd upon know
o5 s:s . Srs; YsG tsn y fne.
frat there think she lived In the Dagge House
fore she lived In the Tahoe House think that
of 1885, not positive about it the Dageett
lodging house, street. near sutton could
tell how long she renaed In that house think
20 tho Tahoe House 1854 will not be positive about OF
the dates recoect OF her removing afsrward 70 stret
don't know how she lived there knew where Mr.
Crtenden lived except At one time that he lived In Mrs
Fairs street; heard he also lived the Tahoe
House; acquainted with Mr.. Crtendeni he 10
Auroro; shss was IN less think judge spneeraed VA. IL
business with him Judge MeKnsry partner OF
his the of parties heard speaking Of cbas
tity, but will not give the Names
JoeKrH v. ATwELr. -
Reside in oakland have resided virginia City my bust
ness merchants resided in Virginia City from ls6O
1857 know The defendant fifteen yea acquainted
with her general reputation for chastity not from
knowedge have heard remarks made OF her while shc lived
den II WAS not good.
Cross examned-I had many businesses Virginia City
heard her reputation for chastity spoken both sides
could not mention the OF heard speaking Of
H. paid particular attention to III cannot whether the
people who spoke Of hsr were IN enpv with herr not
prominent reputation thai she sccessionist that
was about Gag trouble could give any dales o.
language OF what heard people say Of her,