Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1871-10-05
LAW REPORTS.
First ChRneery COurt-MOrEan, Chan.
celIer.

First ChRneery COurt-MOrEan, Chan.
celler.
The court meets st 8 O'Clock this morn
ing, when the case of Hart VS. Shaw, No.
297, will be tried, after which the follow
ing cases will be taken up: s02, Rsyuer
vs. Rayner; 800. Cochran VS. Bersns: 304
DittlebOck vs. Kaufman; 305, McDermott
VS. Ensley; 30S. Irby VS. Biggs; SO7, Sto-
Der VS. Humes; 30S, Scruggs W. Walke~:
SOP Poston VS. Walker; $40. Scruggs vs.
Walker; 81, Hayes VS. Walker; 3I3, Da-
Wis vs. Peplow; 3l5, Joyce vs. Odell; Sl6.
stson VS. Mckinney; 3l7, Reid VS. Reid 4:
$40, Yerger VS. Aiken; $50, Brown vs.
Galloway; S2l, Hilliard VS. Galloway: S22.
Greenlsw vs. Holmes; S23, Torian VS. Hal
lum; S24, Grigsby VS. Street; 396. Wright
VS. Craig; 327. MeschSm VS. Mosby: 500
Bessley VS. Jackson; 329, Battle VS. Brown:
go, EdgiDgton VS. Giles; 3S1. Abercrom-
bic rs Abercrombie; SS4. Forsythe VS.
Willitord; 1856 Atchison VS. Ward: 8Sf.
Markham VS. Hollenshsde; Ss7. Green vs.
Ward; SSS, Russell VS. Hollenshade; 500
Campbell VS. Nelson; $40, McCombs
vs. Smith; SAL, Jones VS. Miller.
3tS, Storey VS. Perkins; 344. James Va
Eppes; 345, Tucker VS. Coffee; 347. Win
chester VS. Smith; S4s, Cloth VS. Mepbsm:
SAY, Williamson vs. Payne; S5I, Dennisoa
VS. Clark; $50 Esstlsnd VS. Clark: 35s.
Champion VS. Taylor; 34 Reynolds Va
Taylor; 1855 Salisbury VS. Taylor: s57.
White vs. Dougherty; S58. Goodlatt vs.
Clerk; S59, johnson vs Mehsn; $50. Mo-
Alister vs. Brooks; S6l, Vaccaro VS. Plant
ers' insurance company.
Chaneery COure-ChAneeuor
Scott.
Decisions yesterday:
Ssnt VS. Mcdonald, leave to amend. ete. |
Msrscheutz vs Edmonds, decree for com. |
plsinspt.
Cases for to-day:
DUNCAN vs. Wicks, on trial will be I'm
this morning, after which, same as
published yesterday, Nos. q, 80, SS. as. AZ.
IS, 49, 80, 81, SO, 81 IS, SO, so, SO, ~. IA. "a
u; Nos 20 and As were coutinued YES.
Nos. Is and IA passed to Noyem-
Der Is.
Attorneys are requested to return all
belonging TO this court at once or
furnish the clerk with the numbers of all
papers they have.
First Cireuit Court-Heiskeil. ID
This jury in the case Of O'Hsrs va the
and Nashville railroad com
osny, returned a verdict In favor of the
To-day's calender contains
be following cases: 1872, now on trial.
90, 1913. 1914, l95 1876, 1877, zoo, POS. 2Is. 221'
"a, 26, ~, go, liSS. heretofore pub
- HAo bu1 AQUftl0nAi 1
asses; 23S, Parke & Dixon VS. J, Behr n
3ro. 234, Green VS. Rose; 236, Moutgom-
~ q Co. VS. Matthews & Alexander: 237
isrhsrt VS. Trezsvants 2SS, Bolton VS.
2S9, Balling Va Grinrod & Brooks:
A, Ruff VS. Williams ct al; 24s, Green vs.
Hawthorne: 245, Gsyoso gas VS.
q Peterson; 247, Hill, adir. vs.
ct al; 24s, Brinkiey vs. Evans. |
10. Courtney vs. Toot, Phillips 4 Co.; $50 I
VS. Payne; 25S, Bawman VS.. Mack. {
& Co.; 24, Cheek VS. Stewart; 26S. I
vs. Wilson t259, Leftwich q s
Ssh VS. Van BrockliB ct 81: go, Bumpass
3 Apperson, ex'tr: N4 R~lsenbaum ct al
+. Feldmsn; 275, Bedford ct al VS. Car G
u ct al; 81, Francisco q Wiggin vs. Z
rfnkley; ISL Weaver trustee, VS. 7
ex'tr. :
eeond Cfreuts Court = HaIsey, Judge. 0
All the cases on yesterdays calendar Z
ere disposed Of
To-day the following cases viii be call \
| for trial; a
l7S, Wallace & Eagon vs. Wells; 1874, o
ALTERING VS. Tufts; 256, Taylor, Cole & Il
cLeod vs. Charkston; 25T, Bstes VS. sames &
., Laid, CsrtwEight q Co W jones' 20, Il