The Cairo daily bulletin. (Cairo, Ill.) 1870-1872, 1871-10-15

Amcs was coming down the bend at Wa
panaukoc very narrow and shallow pla
twelve miles aloye here. Ter rudder
the bank and ceusod the pilots wheel
wirl with great velocity. solncthir
caught ono If tAoIpoke., AMI in less ia
a moment the Who'll didn't have spo
left Every tingl, poke was stripped fro
the rim and band as clean as a whistle, q
the boat wa. compelled to lay by 10 rig
temporary .c.rias machine.
Robert Noes. porter on the steam
Glasgow, il an honest fellow. On the q
rival of that boat at this port night befo
last, a lady p's cnger in paying him ga
him, as she supposed, a one dollar BILL "a
did 1 OF find out her mistake until AFT
she had left the boat when the porter I
going TO the light discovered it TO be
instead of one. Bob hurried out on
wharf boat where he found the lady a.
corrected the mistake. Stick TO it b.
and you will ind that honesty Is alwa
the best policy.
WHARFAGE PRfviLEoEs-wnERE row
LOTS ARE SOLD BY MAP IT - A PART
THE CONTRACT.
Memphis II. LOUIS PackeiCo)
Ben. L. Gray.
PETERS, JUDGE.
Appellee brought this suit to recover
/ appellant II $50 for landing it, boats atI
,,Gl f. ,,,.,,ts,s (f.t,s -.
/ lsGS, to July, 1869, Of which wharf |
landing be- claims 10 b. the owner. ri
answer denied that appellee owned u
| bank whore its boats landed, and aye-r|
/ that they landed vt II wharfboat kept
front Of the bank owned and possessed
the Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company
depot grounds, which wharfboat was keI
by the authority and was in the interI
Of that railroad.
Previous TO the year 1855 the land
which Kentucky City is now situated vi
owned by the appellee, and he, during III
year, applied TO the Hickman coun|
court to lay oil and establish that tow
which the court, by an order, proceeded
do, and appointed trustees. In Aug,}
1855. these trustees circulated throughd
the United State. a large map Of Nd
lucky City. a. proposed, with the streI
laid of and the space between the riI
and the lots and streets represented
" Front Row, and without any rcserv
tion Of wharfage privileges thereon. ri
map wa- accompanied by an ADVERT
mcut Of a public sale Of the lots Of III
town, 10 take place in October thereaft
After this advertisement, and IN Scptc1
Der the Mobile and Ohio Railroad col
pany purchased Of the appellee a porti|
Of the ground 10 this propo-
town, for depot purpose, runni
, to the brink Of the river, ana
GLIDING the bank where the wharf.bC
above referred e. was moOrcd. The de
reserve to the appellee all ferry pri
lcgc., except for the transportation Of ca
! passengers and freight &c, from and
other roads. After this sale, and ia De
Der 1850, the sale of the lot. took place
advertised. and a smaller map Of the to-
was then used. on which the space mark
IA. Front Row on the larger had a res
I walton to the appellee Of all wharfage u
1 ferry privileges. \ trial resulted in V
, dict and judgment for the appellee
4 Held-The larger map must be taken
the written and recorded representation
. the town, Of It's localities and divisions,
streets, alIey-, thoroughfarcs, commC
and public grounds - far as they
r indicated by it; and in these respc
' must be regarded as having entered
V 10 and formed f part Of every contr
for the -alc of lut.i IN the town by numb
or position in the place, and IL, havI
x been adopted and confirmed 10y every G
= vcyaucc Of lot described by i'm
Il reference Is y. Mon 1856. And eY
!. purchaser og lot purchased and paid
" a, nppurtenuut thereto every adyanta
K privilege aud easement represented on
map a. belonging 10 u. The smaller u
,e i. without dat. and l. not shown - b
, existed before the day Of the sale Of
! lots in October $3.50. The deed from
pel!ee to the Mobile and Ohio Railr
= company il dated September II, j
which was after tn, publication and
! ,cminatiou Of the larger map, and ne u
- j. no evidence Of the existence Of
smaller one, then the larger one must
G regarded As forming a part Of their
IL tract, and the grantee took the title
!. of any reservation Of wharfage for Ia
ing.
IN Beside, the claim set up in this case
ct conflict with the terms or which the
K. pellce proposed in hi application to
county court to have the town e,tablis
and with the order OF the court establ
ing the town. Ferry privilege alone
claimed and allowed in the order.
Appellant i, not concluded by the j.
ment and opinion Of this court in the
Of the city Of Columbus vs. Gray q b
40. as il was neither party or priv,
il. II Mar, $50.
Judgment reversed. Judge Lindsey
sitting.