New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-12-11
IIJN LRiE BEIBERI CASE.

Sat: .'.Hr' oF TIE JURORS IN TIE FIsK-G"!D
>.s! -rIOtShND3 OF DOLLARS OFFERED fOi!
t-iGRLEMENT-TIiT CHARGE DENIED.
A, Die tine the verdict was given in the
Black Friday st of J. o. Davis and others agt Fl'E
and Others trod in the superior Court before JUDGE bic
Cn last month, the foreman OF the iilry Waltcr iSoh
charged that three OF their hummer had been improperly
.i,proroL by hrcIii 0i the Els Ring in order To III
,nc agecmcnt and TIA: they were anxious to pre-
sent thc fact &c the Grand Jrry. The Judge accordingly
auunoped the iry appear before him last Saturday
and fv regard to tho alleged efforts to bride them
DANIEL W. Whitney testified ON the 9th OF November
man called at NY reseuc" No IS Bond-s', aid asked
III, If wa, no: the iary in the golf case; rcpci
that a;.d he then asked II wo bal agreed; oia
Inn Ci no, wish TO converse abnnt the ch'r; r sid,
There IL poo,i deal at MONEY for disagreement or
thar jrrJ want to fix 1t OF the spot name yon
me SSs n f!avs 1cn t"r% =. from % and
with hcayy Inust,che and u ford compc xion' ana
nat have ave ever seen him cxcsp on that
day n:tci tnis rn0na. O'CaiL.an who was iorinriy
. mad sIoF"n him aont ting tho jury to Disagree
and le said 4" am going to make money 10y H. amG You
o,.re. No III Nassau.st.
during his cross, nomination. Mr. Whitney said that
inr The oafrlnu- Gibson. tho foreman. and James
OBrcn; Mir GiHNon soon came otcrto ne inajo,y lnt
o. i,rrn CONTINUED obstinate and refused to converse
win t!c Oih"r,; wines then spoke OF TIC efforts tit
liti been made to indure him t. disagree. AMI fond
that Me sis DAVIS aud Vsier had been approached IN
similar ..nr, =; this led them 10 suspect that OBrcn
had b,r bribrG, AMI Caiscd considerable feeling the
night very cod they had No fire. ana were 0bigcd
u .ccp themselves warm ~ physical cAerIst; some
on" prop Jsrd 10 hang OIirn ont Of the window, ana
other threats made nance him 10 agree Will tho
o. h -; the next mnlDinb they obtained copy OF inc
e. .timony and after reading important portions vi IT,
Oirrn iinly became convinced, and agreed 10 |cf-
dit III favor Of the plaintiff
william H. Davis testified that during the trial man
allied b., residence whose general appearance wa'
the sane tlt of tho dcscrbcd 10y Mr. Wmtney;
he gave Baker, and said he was engaged III
The arv goods business 10 BIfaO; he acted In very
Inyst. ron, MANNER md finally went away without
stating ti. object Of hi- visit bc said lie would cl! me
next day At Witness place of business, but failed to
do 4,
John Viscr testified that evening during the prog
rcss trial, while standing In front Of his residence
No. Gas Iighth-ivc., stranger approached nm ana
,hed If lac the jury In the goih case ana on
vncss, rcplyng In the affirmative, he said, There Is
none, in that case ii is worth s. 900 or 900 for dSl
g,rIHt Ne then displayed large package OF DIS,
and sid 81 might inc, 1t to $1,000; witness TO
Piled Y0n must not talk 10 me In that way; where
upon lie lett r,meLng You will DO sorry Tor not ac-
Ccpting my ODER" . M
davts neither OF the defendants in the suit
approached any OF that jury. or authorized any
have been an enemy 10 the dcfendants ITO moved 10
set aside the verdict! but the Judge said that such mo-
tion u,st he made at the special Term. Tho case was
then adjourned to this morning at IL O'Clock, ana mo
Judge requested the jurors who had testified 10 he IN
att udancr that time to revise and sign their tcSti
uOiv and meantime. he said he would consider what
ti,rti,,, Action should be taAcn IN the matter.