Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1871-05-31
@. c. BOWEN.
HIS SECOND TRIAL FOB BIeAMY.
Arguments en- she Law OF divorce.
A Sensation I'm Court.

MRS. PETTIGRuE KING BOWEN
roem With he seeuse She wss dressed 10 White
with puIple veil. and several ladies wers IN the
ives large Dumser Of spects:ers present -
on the penine Of the court Judse Oin stated that
gnsss so. citizen Of New York at the
MRS. BOWEN
was granted, and whether service was made on her
At that time They could consider tue New OK
Mr. b arripsfon said the government would make
10 New fOs
ne tine the case was pc, ding
Nv, 64s,
TIE LAW OF DIVORCE
It appeared that Bowen mad com piled with The PRO
visions Ofthe statute. He held thar il was prirci-
jurisdiction could not be mpesched in courts q The
ssIe or other statts collaterslly
that Il was law that tue party could
record that The defendant was within the jurisdic
was not then il would appear the records could be
MT. Merriek read q case from Wendell XXI, 4S3.
In which II Is bel that the record cannot DO i'm
pesehed. adding New York eontrsdicts herself.
eOud not go beyond it II the record was not good
here siis tpOinrirg TO Mrs: Hing BOwenJ
THE VICTIM
As aft cts property, the validity ohe record may tie
Vcysd He o me The s'S sss 81 Of t E9rss
Milson Istely decided in the Supreme Court Of tno
the record was pTIaEa JGeia suihorny if not concu
sive. He did not believe there was q nudge il
record having for ak years been nninpsacbed. sns
new relations having been formed-tha, the record
Marriage and Divorce IN support VI his arsuinsnt
Referring 70 I'd American Leading GASES !s5, ne
argued that v hen the face OF the record shows the
ccnrt had jurisdiction il cannot be in psached ''''
AN MT; Msrr,sk Continuing his argument said that
eating DIVORCE cases but thst the power was orisi-
court. in New Ysrs and eonense b 20 ,b sai
eas.s sneStln the status OF parties were more in
Mr. Harrington eommeneeS Sis argnmen. by read.
~ ~ an suthorify bearing on the point and proceed
ing upon its face there was ground II i'm peach t.
Resdins from Mills sgt. Dpryes, in 7th Cranch, he
be proved He next read the cese Of BisseIi ACT
Br,ses, IN yth MSS 462 Gleason sgt Dart, 4th Met
court in one state was not good in another unless
that court hsd jurisdiction Of both parties On the
re next referred 70 Story the Constitution page
ana e,sS,st that 70 power was given to New
from other suthorss he . Sin sba S'a Sc
msT OH statute REQUIRED that notice she aid be
ment Of the la. was not compiled with. for at tho
nS Se ins n3 9ss no n =, s
hs, ee aeenasGt had no opporuny % the
SENSATION IN coeRr'
BE thought that II the case went on he womb
Sfa Siss HP hm the sd asPf Sda
Mr. sarrins.. called Attention to the condition
oi the country at the time the alleged divorce was
criminal action against MI Bowen, it deepg seetss
Mr. Riddle Two i.sS &C coSrIpIss LaDIss
staie that he had been Informed that there was NO
susn record N New York as that pr otuc.d
District torIey bad announced that there was no
Cur 81 s to Ss s9ns % the e Of the
pSsmcly made, n ust be sustained or refuted by q
there was no such record on the Giles Of that court.
arc re bad been imposed on b. the defendant he
made by me p.e. and ss th
mere, va: such record the prosecuting ocers
Mr. Riddle said the remark ought not to have
Mr.. Harm gton said tina, perhans IN the heat,
arsument be peht not to have saie it.
sf fecess was here 1 taken.
t Ting to what had already been said By bis as
@ the court FOR the defense,
ite,s,iIg 'f hns FeS Yorker sits UPON this case,
VIII be i bes ssis sDd d Question mD he
and want Of ROT &C..
law the NV ork Law has ben IN All pSnss o.
pursued; 2, New York Law : valid; 3, judgrlent in
or wsns q nT &c IN y sr q FaEd
self;4. residence OF dtfepce she berg there veiun
Of kss ToeS or friend is no bar
Mr. Mr. Fisher closed sbou. * O'Clock p. n. and
Oiin said &c would 'H 'A' ~ TINS MOTEL 'u'se
in .sv .@d,ians IT Maize sSSrsT ,as Mrs
, ,n "A lng Boweu-hr Bowen's present wife-en-
The NEw YORK DIVORCE ALLRssD TO BE A
FRAUD AND FORGERY"
had AIDE to the teieSrams and read the follow W.
Fisfe u s iaorney-H.1e aSsniiEsa the e eI:rt
r q rds Ind an entry Of the bat erasure have
the ensures No Judgment fis or
a1y tins Have examined the transcript for JsD
a1s he but find no u WIN
,, NEW Iosk; May g, mi think II. Whole
VIII come on to night. Moan DAVIS,
The court then adjourned. '' e''''' A'"rney.
NJ ~ amernoens IN the Circuit Court, Judge Wy
I'D tss i ssf Ss :.s and TS,
i 5ss N q Ks.s!eas The Ssh Sovs%ser,
I1sicis. e ssI os.i; b ayp
eonfisus upd s ialss ccors The in,imscy
sSIsx .n' W. g pasn ts: Pi Il
IN , is5; s iSs Morality
% sss truth Gr the proofs Of the most
Mr. Miller briefly opened the case reading the
% ososis,iop, ehtrse,eizins the publication as
prove that the publication the result Of COM 10
Il &c T,ssfs: m4 su.,, The
as managing editor. 'esn
MI. u. X. Harms, sworn:-witness was m an aoine
editor OF the hspEbtteaR when the alleged hbel va
p1bIisned, and Mr.. Murtaeh be proprietor
mr. Matlingly here read the Hbeous article en-
Ire ss also an article Ia the Papers Il November Is
ne pleintffs rested their case
Mr. Eliot said the defend arts were actuated by NO
feelings Of malice III will and expected te pfoya
me alt In the ALLEGED libel. and If they did
20 prove they would demand . verdict NN
III. u a HdyrtS for defence Was then svorn
snd proceeded 10 give his testimony on THIS point
me case was IN progress when orr report closed
ClkOUlT COURT, Judge Wyhs English. Psul
= 20, IS sinsebsugh; ordered on calender Lead
Cou pspy vs. Parker McNiehol; verdict for nlsi'.
u Ior egg q Bridget vs.. Myers; verdict for
gislnun for 9If, and interest from July 27tn IS7I
1esry vs. Lyon; verdict for plaintiff for s74 S.
xPQLICK COURT, To DAY, Jusgs srsu-rmanna,
charge with behaving in Very al, tne dock
IN street car Yesterday, in n turin from the
decoration ceremonies ct Arlfngt< n De had sn,ire
possession Of the car, and the condi,-tor not heinz
spie 70 attend TO bis case, called Oecer Crnmn 4,
the First Ward who teek him 70 the station an ~
tnls morning he bad the assurance 70 DENY the Who'll
Dauer, pot the evidence was to the point And he
was bned IS. John Burdette and Nm Wi;iisms
~ sheious reepass IN breaking dow cherry tres
Delo nsine 70 Mr.. Newman, Of Georretovn: sns
pSnoeo untI TO morrow. FRANK Whitney coiored
" stones st the procession fined IS Geory,
tnsd IS. '''' ~ oo~s aley;