New-York tribune., 1871-10-03
Ju Is7o for the ,nele article Of shades alleged by

Ju 1870 for the single article Of shades alleged
Smith by Ingcrso IN his name to haze srss been 81 fT 3
window, IT would require 5000 windows to Justify
S"ro not ncy 500 windows o s sa County Snda
The same Is equally true of the charge OF Oyer $1,000
tOr TO 6ssn dome upSn sad
the charge of upward of d for repairing tnS verg
o9 It sS Sasn pny ~
bly, wicked and nattous In the extreme Ana An. hsIs
Ing almost new should cost double the amount
sssfss q snSs,S E
tss County sefe ts snG
during the years 1869 and 1870, alleged by said Geo.
Miller to have been done and performed by him ana Pad
full knowledge that sad parties were frauanIenty con
said vouchers and warrants were repeatedly presented
to said Mayor in large numbers and Quantities ana or
aH sSs Dse d
for sums amounting in the aggregate TO lsa 10, pay
Two days later he signed three warrants f9r sums
amounting in the aggregate to fscc H. payable ,Ss all 70
rant for t12Ssso S. payable to InsefsO another
warrant for Os7O @ payable TO said Garvey The very
amounting to ntsleO H. payable to Ingersoll another
on Nav so, 1870 TO Garvey amounting 10 Aoelo 20, anu
a. 10 ST Two d daTs Istcrthas H. On May So
signed warrant for the sum Of 2ss g. payable
days later he signed two variants, amounting to to
.i9o6 H. one payable directly to ,hd hInssssO SnG dnd
he signed three warrants Cor s2S,623 a. PAYABLE
| TO Garvey. Three days later he signed thir,oen
warrants for 9es4 a. four Of which were payass to
Keyser four to Garvey for $666 49, two to Miller anu
three j. A. Smith. -Four days later he signed seven
warrants for t3t9O &c. three Of which were payaDe 10
Garvey for SOSO7o Is; TO Ingersol for t6sy ~
one to Boiler for t6487 81 one TO Miller Tor H4h So'
and one to Keyser for t6S30 So Three days later ne
signed three warransOne to 1ngersOl, forSS259 W anu
two to Garvey for $ S27 49, -Four days later ne ssnu
three warrants for $36S9l 92-two to Garyey 1of w.
l23 H. and one TO Miller for A8768 Al. Three Gays ater
he signed five warrants for t246lS Ozone 70 Ingersol
for &6292 SO two Garvey for tS 90l 6l one 10 Miller
for f4O965 a. and Keyser for 1858 g. Four ua
later he signed two warrants for Garyey amounting 10
49, Three days later he signed four warrants lor
S22757 Alone to ngersO for 1880 9S one 10 Geo. o.
Miller for tls74 69 one to A g. Miller for lOS a. anu
one to Keyser for 1888 CT. . A.. xon
Three days later he signed ten warrants TO tne same
parties for &43 two to Ingersoll for xl15 ~ Two
to Gee Miller for f7629 s. two to Gsrvey Ior ss9s
one to A. &. Miller for $9932 o. two TO Boiler loI S
$50 3O and to IngersOll In j. A. smiths Name JOE
s37 26 g. character OF these transactions per
yades the entire years o. 1869 and 1870 ana the su
Mayor rarely sgued such warrants upon the days wDeh
numbers warrants for wages and salaries Wel
signed but such fraudulent warrants were, IN Inc geat
majority sent over for his signature py
themselves apart from all other warrants so nat ne
cOud confused when he signed such lrau
uent by the pressure Of any duties upon oo
nary payroll warrants. W.S CoPLAHD.
aud sworn to before this I'd day of OctO-
Der 1871. B. III. BIXBY, Police Justice.