New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1871-01-31


| mission for negotiating the sale of Long
| view plantation, IN the parish of 81. james.
The evidence establishes the claim of the
| plaintiff judgment affirmed. Lldelins,
| G. J.
| State VS.. E:ncrntc Bayonnc. alias Sara
| godas and Pedro Abriel.-Appea from the
| First District Court-Defendaats were
| found guilty OF the murder of - AMbro-
| sio. whose first name is unknown. 1t is
| urged thai the indictment. charging the
| prisoner with the murder Is void Tor uncer-
| tanty and dl:plicity. in that there is not Il
| sufficiently legal deSi ynatIon OF the person
| alleged 10 haze been killed. Counsel
claims that the description OF tle person
| killed IS rcpugnant beca1'se Ambrosio in
| French OF Spanish, in Latin Am0rosius. in
Engl!si, Ambrose. are as papabiy first
| names as George or john, and they ask the
! question III their brief, 'NouId IN indict-
ment stand describing person alleged 20
haV" been killed merely as one George.
whose first name is unknown -
In ti,c Tw2n.y-,i,st Annual there are two
cases. IL which the last ma nle o: each plain
tiff 5 James. In this ana 4 multitude of
other examples. what a.c often used as
Chi;staa names are used aS sG-nanles. The
phrase quoted from the indictment.
"Alubroso. whose first nam. = unknown"
is no. inconsistent ald se.:-siestguc:;vc.
JuislHea. affirmed.
Stat. IS. George E:itz. ais George
Frey.-Appcal rom tAe Fig.t District
Cour..-Tl,e defendant has been tried and
convicted of the ,cine of forgery. and sen
fenced 20 imprisonment =. ut,i labor ior
foir years.
In order - pro. .h.. he ord: for tn.
delivery os t.le goods wa III The Aaudwrit-
iny c. the Defendant. .ne District Attorney
was permitted - introduce - the Jury
another paper o. writing 1ot on the saline
subject u...ttc,, Tor thc l.Irposr .: instialt
| in. comparison o. handwriting. thereby
p:orin, .:Iat The oIuo' aged ~ he
forged was IN the hanh.:!t:n. o. IL. de
| :cn:isu:.
IA. r..e j., settled IN in,..nd and in
,nn,ly OF tAc State, Of tlc ulon that com
pa.i>on of hand. hv iIy'aposition "f TWO
writings, II order 70 aSo', 5..ln !! both were
wI.tt,i by the same person. /, not ad-
Missile.
l. i, ordered .h.. the ir.igncn. appealed
from be lode.i annu:ied and that this
! .,l.sc be rc:n.nCc.i :oT new trial. and 70 De
. proceeded N acgoTdin. - law. Nyiy.j.
Ann!e C. DisgS vs. lame, Mal.TE TE.-Ju;:g-
! men: o: C"ur: .y'tI affirmed. Labelling. C.j.
Samuel t:r.cE,t. ". Thomas L. Leather,
- I..App.t. from III. Fourth District
C.:.t. This j. :,a action agA,n>' the cap
tam ..li owne:- o: the st"anc. Magenta TO
irnit" then! liable IL damages 70 the
a "A
~. .,,,',';. ,,.'I ~ ~. ,,'.,.;4 -,', ,,In,,e.
w. t,n.d. I,,,. ,,aynr ia; ..rcd I. = .hnrr
w.. .rl .f,.,,,n..r. VS. ,p,da ~, ,i, NJ.
n..nt. t,r >.Cnn ~, N. Y.ron var Tn.
goods wevs :c-hi,prd ~ |.cz.nur. on a
. sm.jj s..,m,r,.,|ni :ha Mrr.:r w,i,.;, wa.
-ul.S ~: .,c" va - Z" i,.oo. and tin"
good. We ...-. The "yiicDy. shows that
III" H".'!. "i> utterly in-:,"ortnT. and
-. t,..,, y. ,f,,-.. =. ..r ~, mar :rin
we! VA. .n.n.,s.nn. ,....,- .i,,Iy,nan,
-;i,n,a,i v.I;,+.,-.o ::
t'.3.lr. ...,. ,,c.,v.- y: In. r;r-, E.-
.;,n,, Ran, ~. H.w Gr.r,o, 4. Mar
cham: .. ,l.-A,,,,al .re, ..,e Fifth District
C,ur. I'll, J,.-poj,o. .,.nd. sized As
! ;,,. ,,.,-zer a. a 1".,,;..,.v r..e. h,, ;n
| uD,i.., rom ~. ind .n4,,- a,ainst him
Jr.,.e;,.i,t .. :l. love: COR. ,;4i:n.i. with
s:.no .i,,uarc. -" :y:vo. ,,- ,n,ea!.
& Cas-. -n,r,vr-.. 90 IS !. ". Cannon
and y a. Nr.,., =, r...,.,- y, .,ro7ni.,ory
no,.-A,n.. ). :rol.. -le '..-h D:-tr:c; Court.
On IN. So. nj TIA! IA n. so1-. below judg-
mon VA. rendered ,,,.,s. Cannon alone
,nr :-an,. .r,m Ubi,r, h. h.. a,.,.;.tns.
l., ,v,iarcd that tn. md .nen. appealed
from l.. -p,irl,.d from >7O0l 70 5000. costs
~. ,,rr,' -. .. rad ,,- r,,,io-;-:
i,ns,,.,, 4 S.rrno,;->. !, 4. >',,,ooo-
An,,,,l .,.n III. Eou.+h D..~.. Cu;r,-
! On.F,, ..,.,-', o.. .,,:,. '-5,; ..',jn.if on
.,i,,.i :; .,,,rp.,. r,r So /, .,,j .-r +b.
.wcr-v..;~.. a.. .:r,s ia, Sc:,.d :, l,t of
| .,I,,,..,i, .,,n ,-,,,.,,.s.. ~ .,,. d. Nor.
90, 80 .b. ,r,,.,,.v ~. ~, ,,afnnd,,.
"rarn-,,nr, Nrs " :; I.no,. c,,i,ir,G tha
So. n,, n. e.r,f.ri .,,. IN, .,r,n..-.: he
I,.,,a; "a I,or
~, .L - a,, t,+,,;r,a,; -, -oc.;.,. Of
! ,,,n ,.-,-.-,ou...u,, i, her name. .nr the
80, s.,,. .,i,,o@n ,,; ,;i, ,.i -. n,,y.;,,..
,,r +,,a ..r,s
tn. rl,in.if offered r,c testimony %: 4
broke. 20 the effect .hit he Was Authorized
- aH"thcr b:ohe' IN tac presence OF shan
non 20 sell tls tobacco. That ne oHt!ed II
ior sale is Shannons property: went with
| the party to the warehouse, asked TOT >h.n-
nnl : tobacco anh was shown th!s to-. !ui-'
:nent o: The icw"G toutt reversed ana ;lld--
ment rendcC"h n :i:oF - Ms. NJ T N"rE.
~ r,c,:,..r o.o ~, I,s,iers,,
! :. ai-Aupcal from III, Fifth District
CoUyt. % recover .n prom ,ssorv note.
.'uI. .men. a.ain:: 0...1t.n-. affirmed.
. Howell. =
i;uIi9ci g. Williams -. C..,Ee:.s Bank
ot Louisiana -Appca. Z ON tle sixth Dis
t.!,t iour:.-Tse p.aint.!. have suc'i the
defendant tO.' .nc sum Q: $500, pavabi: II
CON, as the 5ailncc dit2 them cn deposit
>",teMber Is. 1851, wnen :he nanN su>l'en-
| ded recie payment ans; which sim they
,lIc-c the defendant stipulated % keep as 4
special deposit, not to J.. drawn out ..n,ii
the clos, OF tn, Wa.
- = ordered mat '.ic ,tCC mem Appealed
from be reversed: ANA it is now oricvcd that
:.,e defendants reconycHt.ona. demand i'c
| dlsn. ,-e;i, and that rlaint.tt. recover OF de
:CnAa n. .le >t.n. Ok 9ioSi Si ~ Goa. TOW
Ell. ).
u. supreme (oL!: h:j:i!'n;i iH... n.'Xt