The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1871-04-15

sr sssson even he i%:: might moi have occupied
az hat &c s H.. ,s nj.
Mr.. HcsErEY-Tben my colleague = too high toned
cred =: st
Ba is; nat pass prcsssd another
Rssss s III
s' fssss'sP AN ss:
sssns hs Of the city o. New Ysr i.r The sI
sS s those IL: sssss +: ne
; ssps e. people that you us s D. d:r: s an
Opportunity to :sna here Do th.. and the
. % !. o.
xsasf.x my rsassss q u excused ss Aye MOI
Re- ne
s due re q b. 5
door han By The q
@ s S % @ T1s q
caucus Of that party nigh. 90. but on my own responsible
ny as e % Tns rss e.
Iss..ss sna Is'
the people Of that district 70 be here without the
Sss Ess:.pSs AZ y , and s IA m,
wo u The cam $ s1S an
session within twenty thirty days after and in the
'fss
Mr. pEscETl aid not understand the gentleman from
Mr.. EIriDs- said was too thin Renewed laushter,
the law AS was saying The Governor can call special
special election Il the sisteenh district and then suppose
tina The democratic party here win have their constitutional
they choose take the responsibility Of passing
% IL. ask s e % shs s
existing law without Adjournment, OF the Legislature e
Mr.: pnISoEwha have said Is that we can 20 on here
support o and them atou and that the ovrnor who
j ey Ss s &c .eeS sGfs '"n so e
ns Of e Lesauq Ra would ave he
~ party %sC,y ana ,ss he e.
s mno1 Se To- vote eSoos and the the
Iy ,h. u s.S
II tho eourss have Suggested had been adopted every
as sv! carried sf
sr ~ for q % a: aSyou haze sSsy % ss
think the case Of tag s. dis
from suffolk, whose name passed s Who taeeers
nss ssaa
ssPabsn psry ah hP the from The
sy s
ne Of but distinction only a fair (, a@S ,sssn The s
@ they would that have
united acton s Of the democrats a. party while BY the
s ssSS ~ sys p q
csa ass % ssT: s soH ws q have
besn designated the member who should vote
with the democratic party in pursuance Of that under
Eanding but the circumstances entirely different,
and think that In justice to myself and others similarly
situated the distinction ought TO be distinctly drawn
Mr.. ScRIDNER followed with some remarks
The bill was lost by vote OF s. TO 81
Mr. JACOBS who had changed his vote to the negative for
that purpose moved reconsideration ana that that motion
lie Vi on the table
The bill then lost by the following vote =
Blair j. Rrown Buck, Buckley d. Burns, Campbell Carey,
Chamber n, Chambers, Cole, Connelv Conseyea Cook
COON Coyie, Curtis Decker. Drew, Fields, Flags T. Flana
gam Fleck Frear, Fuller, GrGn Hayer. Hyes D. B. Hill.
Hove Joy Kelley Krse & D. Lord LGars Mad
son, Nicholas, Oakley o'Brien, o'Nei, Randall, Ransom,
Ray Roche, spesker sweet Zen kyck Van steenbursh,
Wainwright, Waterbury, Weed Wiey-6S
NoEsMessrs. Aberger, Ayord, Baker, Barney, barHe,
Remus Berry, Rgnan Backal, Bolt, Bradford, " r
wick, Delano, Duree, Ely. Fisk, G. n. fenagn, Clifford
Gleason, Goodrich, Graham, Green Hewitt Hill, Hustled
Jacobs j. johnson, R. johnson, Kham, Knapp, Little ohm
9. p Lord Lynde, AcDougal, milford. Nortnup fahud,
Pierce Pound Prince, Sage sanborn scroner seikreg
Seward sngsr s,evenson str11nn sSndern
Mr. JACOBS had changed his the negative for
that purpose moved reconsideration and that that mo-
ton lie on the table. ~
ordered and the motion was agreed to-yeas g,
nays 55.
The House then took until halfpast seven p N.
Evening Session.
The House met at half.pa O'Clock.
The House then adjourned TIL eleven o'clock tomorrow
morning.