Juniata sentinel. [volume] (Mifflintown, Pa.) 1846-1873, 1871-05-03


sent but two bills were before tn
Grand jury in the Sessions. One wa
'ignored-in the other a true bill fount
End defendant acquitted. The jury trial
were not commenced till Tuesday morn
ing and were over by Wednesday even
ing The argumen; list and miscella
neous business occupied the whole O
Thursday till late hour in the night
when the court adjourned sne de.
Argusient List.
Jacob Spade VS. jeremiah Bruner and
William Carl -l.ule to show cause whv
judgment should not be entered for defts
non obstante veredic:o.
Same vs. same-Rule to show cause
why Judgment should not be entered
against the defendant jeremiah Bruner
non obstante vcredic;o or why a new
trial should not be granted. After an
elaborate argument by counsel on both
sides held under advisement.
ADMINISTRATORS Of James Dunn. deed,
vs.. Margaret Charters. Rule to show
cause why Judgment for want of appear
ance and affidavit of defence should not
be opened 27th April. 1871. Rule made
absolute, but upon the terms that the
deft should not plead the statute of lin
ita:ipn.
L. j. Middagh, plf in error. va Sam
uel Murphy, eerteorari to + W. Ii.
Kreider, ESQ., 27th April. 1871. Deft
in error having entered mol pros in the
appeal taken by William Young. this
judgment against I. j Mddash is af-
tirmed
John Landis, agent, and plff in error,
vs. Peter Nvman.-Certeorari to Jesse
Reed, Esq. 27th April, 1871. Judg-
ment reversed.
j. G. Powell, plff in error, vs. Com. of
Pa -Certeorari to E. W II kreider,
Esq. Proceedings affirmed
In the matter of the application of
John McNanigal for license to keep
public house in the borough Of Perrys-
ville Rule 10 show cause why the license
granted at February term should not he
revoked. 2Ith April, 1871, RGle dis
charged, and it Is directed that the fees Of
the Witnesses be paid by the party who
subpoenaed them or directed them to be
subpoenaed.
In the matter Of the petition Of the
Court of Quarter Sessions for the ap
pointment OF auditors to settle the differ
ences between Delaware township and
Thompsontown borough. The iurisdic
ton being in the Common Pleas and not
in the Quarter Sessions. The proceedings
were set aside
Overseers of Delaware township VS..
Overseers Of Greenwood township. Ar I
gued and held over.
Triai List.
Lewis \. Lands vs.. Jeremiah Lyons
and Henry Gross, assignees. &c.-This
was feigned issue deducted by the .
Court in an attachment execution to de-
ter,Dine whether the pltf in issue was en-
titled to certain moneys and goods /
claimed under the $500 exemption law
April %, 1871, verdict for deft +
James Grouse VS.. William VI. Allison /
This was an action of replevin brought
by pltf to recover from deft mule, !
without hair, blind of an eye, hoof bound,
afflicted with the heaves, and that could /
not be driven or coaxed, sold at consta
bles sale as the property of B F. Grouse,
and bought by def, Piff alleged that
the mule was not the property. of B. L
Grouse, but that he was the owner by
virtue of sale made shortly before levy,
to which def replied that the sale was
The case was very vigor-
ously contested, and resulted in a verdict
for deft of s65, the value Of the mule, on
which Judgment of de retororo habendo
was entered.
The other cases on the list were dis
posed of as follows:
David Smith vs. Ephraim & Wilber
McCachan Settled.
James 5. Vines vs.. William Stroup.-
Nonsuit
Samuel Smith vs. Elder r. Clifford
-Countermanded.
William Young VS.. F. VI. Mickey
Judgment by consent for deft do retororo
Value of goods replevined
sI33.12. Rent in arrears Sl33 IL.
George Searer, admir- of Jacob Searer,
decd. VS.. Abraham Shelley.-Discon-
tinued.
Jacob Zeigler VS.. Pa Canal Co.-Cop-
inued
John S. Luken VS.. Leah Fike.-Set
led by parties.
Frederick Schickle VS.. Henry Leeter
I Co -Nonsuit.
Eliza Thompson vs. Jerome N. Thomp
on and George Rumbangh, Executors of
Iauda A. Thompson, dec'd.-Nonsuit.
John Brant, admir-, &c, fer use of the
Executors of Martha A. Thompson, deco
-. James n. Thompson.-Discontinued