New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1871-03-13

hoped he had got recOnciled about tho maieI,
Kate would not he injured by II in his estimation that's
the way talked to hlm tried to cool him down htei
wanted to have the trouble recded If could he sald
Sep dollar Of his money; then remarked that hoped
Kate wouldn't he injured by IL he said, no; that ne naa
provided for her that is about the substance OF Wae
occurred; talked little with him and le theh
didn't see him after that"
lie HAD FINED THE HowLANDs.
William l. SLardlow testified that he had known MI
Taylor from 20 to 30 years. probably IS years and tha' e
had known the wife and granddaughter about 10 years.
he testified that he had n conversation with Mr. lay
between the let and 18th OF July in Mr. Tayors
Office and added A. cannot rocOect the conversalu
particularly, only the main points or IL; WaS he Id
te that he had gwen Kate 5000 and that ue iS
HOwlands should not have any OF ne uoTS ~ ,ade
tnat that was the exact expression that mr. lay
O. Go on and state all he said the subject A.. 1ha a
pretty much all that was said on u" fhat he
is all that think that Ike SAID on hne ~ maj purpot
had fixed the Howauds, or something 10 ma aords 10
that they should have none OF his money vi "o'D'
q Where was Mr. Taylor's family his wife and grand
daughter, at that time A. Ihsy VII bont them in this
coyersaiioni A. think heard MIN say at tat cb hiH o
that Mr. Howiand had abused Mrs 1ayloi a p az tbot
! something like that; think hearu nm soy ~ ~
! tm& -, ,,o,,co ,,r the mistakes and mis-
Sn,s 10 which all witnesses are lbe III tesn-
fyng TO conversations after cOnsidelapc iP 49, IA
soI,ction ~ al mat was saidsn. looking at the gen.
eral effect and bearing Of the evidence nuoVJ I,
RAGE there is no reasonable doubt that IN those dech
tions and statements the deoedeni elelfa 70 oe VIII
~ declarations by deccdent ot contrary of conc,hg
tesamentary acts or Intentions dunng tne peacu S -
months next before his death II is strong oOhhflEOiy
evidence that the decedent had chabged tle puIp4e
aud dispositions, which contestants WIsSes ,os'vu
be had previous % her marriage expressed 10 theih con-
cerne s ~ tbf in this case TO show or tending 20
show mat the provisions OF the prOpOunded instrument
are so inconsistent las has been claimed with natural
ntian ar viii the devoted attachment proven TO have
|
10 render u improbable that ne could nave cAccut.
snc an instrument or II he did execute it, that it must
have been done with undue influence OF fraud upon HIM
That there was always the most afectioDate relations
between the decedent and his granddaughter, to the
time OF his death, IS placed beyond question by the eNl
deDce before Inc and do not except from tins state
mcnt rven the dspleare which it is established by the
testimony Ia felt when his granddaughter secretly lett
edge in company with young Mr.. Rowland, 10 20 10
distant place for the purpose OF an iinmedate nlVa
marriage; when even the hetrothal between them had
not yet received his SANCTION as the evidence cOlNIs
me to believe; aud after Mrs Taylor had expressed her
disapprova OF the MARRIAGE although appears rom
testimony the contestant, that she had previously en-
cOurascd and approved Of the engagement
"KATE. now COULD YOU LEAVE ME37
But even that dspleasure proof Of the most sens-
tive pride and affection for her, both OF which were
deeply wounded and tire young bride herself, Of her
own voiton hastened back to the city in few days,
from New BedfOrC-no 10 STAY for she remained bnt
day-ad with what conscientious motives and mpellcd
by what feelings, she, while here, sought her Father
and the state Of his affection toward heron Ter apparent
peneuce when they het-suliciehty appears nom Ile
testimony that when hc went into the room, MS inst
| words were, "kae, how could you leave me = enc
testified that b. came down very Wucn Affected anu SL5
also; she began 10 cry ana she lelt very hy ana
would make herself SICK and mat he KISSED hef ana se
sat upon ms lap 10y the window; and MIS- DOlnely, TIC
housokeeper, who, seems, had o. her own accord,
asked Kate 10 call, tescs that on that occasion, Kate
went up TO her father and embraced him. and he took her
Iat she heard her say "FaL3er ut sag anything 10
:" and yet 1t further appears from the evidence u
no reason Goubf ng accurate in substance. that
when she told him Kate was in the house he seemed very
much excited and said he cOgld her, aud he went
Ia OF IL ,,n then a,on into M, room ead came ont
again and said he would not see her ana she asked INN
10 please 20 down and her, Thai Sc wanted 70 5to
linn Very Snuc If il wac only 10 tc her that he would
not forgive her; that he was very much excited, aud
be said no he wOud down; that he did not know
what be came faY that she had caused him great deal
Of trouble and she asked him again 10 60. and he did
go into the back the first floor, aud she Was
feTe alone and Mr. TAYLOR said when he inst went into
The room KaL Ior Guild goa do ms 7" hrs DOnnely
having overheard and what she airns, by being in
! The parlor connecting with that room
Here deem it important TO observe that It appears
| That on that occasion, young Mr. HOwiaud Went INTO
tie bas meut before Kate Der atheg and renal ed
there during the call and neither Kate nor MIS- Ion
nelly having testified that, on that OCCASION any reer-
encc made 10y, OF IN conversation wth hf. iaylDr,
to the husband, conclude that Mr.. Taylor did not
the young and was not aware that he was in the
house or that he knew he was there h was unwilling
| 10 see him and that consequently, there were no
proven signs Of reconciliation hen, towards him; an
important distnc0u bearing upon another Dlahoh ol
! the case. - - $3.50,
THIS W MAN
There f. Other evidence showing that the deco
! -. - ,,,t.. s.,r 80. ,,,or,ss,o .Vh;tt.oJ o. tis
! pcHl' Ncl9 al''''1 'i''i Va" 'e'' N'''N W -"
friends violent disturbance of his temper and that he
even said IN effect thai his granddaughter UOtitd g1s
or make nothing by a. but the witnesses who spoke
Of that, quite uncertain OF the precise date III view
% tbor cotlig and uostve evidence II l. nv belief
~ eluccalIy after the first can made on MT Tayor
s1bseoi5cnt no the marriage he could have used no III
800, "a I'm resI 10 herself boDqh tpust
HI3 bot the eyiIepce fail. In estellsh that moi with
,5is ~ frea,-e ate in bis heart he could not for
80 1,1css and rnrtification the
- tbn 1.r-i.ge scd him M Tie tiIoe stil il IL sin
esnt f""t tt ms Kste tcsto lr father meyer spalle
|