Knoxville weekly chronicle. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1870-1875, 1871-09-27

The following proceedings were had in the
Supreme Court yesterday
Polly Lowery VS. McKeden ct al reversed
and motion dismissed.
Jno Bottom VS. Robt Hacker CT al; reversed
and remanded.
Charles L King VS. J NJ Alexander; decree
modiie6
J NJ Alexander VS. Eliza Dunn, Adm'xi az
frmed.
Wells & Mayfcld VS. J Martin ct al; re-
versed.
o G Henderson VS. c McGhee ct al reversed
and rcmanded.
Abner Estep, in error. VS. + NJ Presswood;
affirmed.
Jas G Quoener ct al VS. VIM Trew ct al af-
frmed with notifications and remanded.
Samuel Park VS. Jack Walden reversed and
remanded.
J Il McElrath in error vs. Isabella johnson,
adm Y reversed,
Jos Love vs. Turley ct al; reversed
Chas w Rice VS. Buckner ct al affirmed with
notifications and remanded
Chas i Matlock VS. j w Gibson and wife
decree affirmed with notifications
Drury Morris VS. Bewley &c Bayless; affirmed
VIM Boond VS. Richard Hayworth IL Son re-
Jas Hubbs VS. p 5 Starnes, in error affirm
ed.
Henry Mitchell VS. Adam Allen affirmed
jackson Try VS. John Collins ct al affirm
ed.
J ID Curl VS. Sarah Simmons affirmed
l. A Garrett VS. w i Rogers affirmed
Enoch Marshall VS. George Ham affirmed
Dan'l Ham VS. Edward Clark reversed.
Dick Alexander VS. Il Pace ct al, motion to
| dismiss appeal allowed.
w Hall, in error, VS. y Walker, admir- &c !;
| affirmed
| Goddard VS. hurry affirmed.
Tho: } Blanchard VS. John Nance ct bill
| dismissed.
Kincad & Dosset VS. d j Rodgers and wife ;
| reversed and remanded
| VIM NJ McClain VS. Jno Brooks; affirmed.
It1.l.. -
judgment.
VIM Smith VS. Henry Asapp; affirmed
| Vincent Myers VS. Kennedy IL Rodgers APP
plication to dismiss.
Thos Dalton VS. VIM Lcgerwood affirmed.
| Fuller IL Mitchell, exrs VS. b 4 Mcfarland +;
| affirmed.
G. b. Mitchell VS. J A Mckinney affirmed.
=P Nance VS. James Burch affirmed.
| Gill IL Wyatt VS. Wyatt & Gill reversed.
Daniel Cleage ct al VS. jesse Hyden ct al re-
| versed and remanded.
On the trial of this cause in the court below,
counsel objected to any juror sitting in the
| cause, that belonged TO either branch of the
Methodist church0it being a case involving the
| right of possession to church property. The
court below refused to sustain the objection.
| The Supreme Court reversed the judgment rem
dered below, because the challenge of Jurors
was not allowed, saying that the members OF
both branches had such a beneficiary interest in
the result as made them incompetent to sit il
the cause.
|
the thirty cases decided.
A = Miller VS. Jas Wilson affirmed.
j w Brown VS. G n Spicer; affirmed.
4 Bogges in error VS. n G Givins reversed
and suit dismissed.
Thos Blanchard VS. John Nance ct al ; bill
dismissed
Samuel Gill VS. Russell Wyatt and Russell
Wyatt VS. Samuel Gill, bill and cross bill; re
versed.
JIG Queener and wife VS. VIM Trew ct al
Warner Trew VS. j @ Queoner and wife ct al
VIM Trew and others VS. j G Queener ct all at
frmed with notifications.
Chas w Rice VS. G ID Bucllner, in own RICH
and as admir- affirmed with notifications.
G B Mitchell VS. J A McKineny afiirme
} and remandcd.
j + McElrath in error VS. Isabella johnson
adm'X; reversed and execution quashed:
w Y HUFF, in error, VS. w w Fritts death o
| plaintiff suggested and cause revived in nam
of Jas w and VIM Z Huff, Ex'rs.
Thos Champion, admir-, VS. Hardee " Webb
| appellant allowed to file n new bill.
Richard Leek VS. VIM NJ Burnett ct al deaf
of defendant Sam'l Vance suggested.
The State VS. Granville Stephens; remanded
? Circuit Court.
Biggs & Borden, in error, VS. Susan Gwin
2 admx, &C. suit dismissed and judgment rever;
l ed as 10 NJ w Borden, who RECEIVERS costs {
G Kirk and Sneed vs. VIM and Sam'l Morrow
death of VIM III Sneed suggested and cause RI
vived in name of Joseph IL Sneed, Esq.
VIM IL Sneed VS. G w Jones, Judge, &c,
Q al; do.
/ WIN II Sneed VS. Otis Hill; do.
1 VIM Robinson admir-, &c VS. Jas Swaggert
p ct al and Henry Smith e Townsend ct al
f VIM Robinson 81 Jas Swaggerty decree
!. | court below modified and account ordered to /
0 taken in this court,
: Clinton A Charles VS. w Taylor; deere
confirming sale.
Nancy johnson ct nj VS. Calvi in johnson
> al certiorari ordered to issue for fuller r.
. cord
@ John Kincaid, in error, VS. VIM Woodson
| appeal dismissed.
Nancy Buren, VS. Henry Burom ct al deaf
, of defendant suggested and cause served again'
II his administrators and heirs.
VIM Snow and II Cattles, in error VS. The
: Grigsby publication ordered for non 'residel
}. defendant
s. Cowan IL Dickinson VS. Laban Sharp ct a.
certiorari ordered to issue for fuller record.
= Jackson and Grub, in error, VS. Carter AT
a Simpson, admir-; motion to rctaN costs in cou
n below entered
y JAS Brown in error VS. Williams and wifi
7. certiorari ordered TO issue for fuller record
"a Jams Parks, guardian, VS. j McCorkle and
n Rose Chas King ct al; certorari ordered TO
d sue for fuller record.
Enoch Marshall VS. Geo Haun; affirmed wi
notifications.
Richard Powell VS. Andrew Peck; revers,
~ and remanded.
A l. Lineheart VS. J & ID Smith affirmed.
80 John Mcdowell VS. VIM Miller; reversed al
= remanded.
&c Boond VS. Brooks and Brooks VS. Boond, q
a frmed with notifications and account ordere
. Boyd & Phelps, surviving partners vs. ID
a Hoskins, surviving partner affirmed with cost
u The State VS. Haskins, Daniel; reversed