New Orleans Republican., 1871-02-07
NEW ORLEANS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY Z, 1871

-...-----
! writ of haheas CORPUS upon the ground
that the yagrant act of the eS-islature.
passed at it's las: session, is unconsti-
| tu.:onal.
! .jndyc Dibblc comedies with the opinion
recently rendered by Judge Collens. OF the
! Seventh District Court, and sustains the
| law.
! The accused was thereupon remanded into
| the custoJy of the Sheriff, 70 be released
| rron his giving bond in the sum Of $1,000.
rtcf,o,,a,oorn Railroad Cases.
~, :'.,.. to, ,1.c ,;ch, of wov
INC Si.a' e"l'ts. AZ. ~ .,'a ,,.,t.7'ro or ,o,.a.,
| .p". ai', "re"p:.''Lh ,nh;.h y. tbn Ch,+tan"oo,
..,;ir,aj ;s n,,rnsaI hv the city. Charles
| Wnr"nn tho pontcbartrain railroad, and
certain front uropietors, was resumed yes
| -.rdav hc,ore .judoe Dibhlc Mr. Miles
| TAYLOR conc luded his argument in behalf Of
| Mr. .;nr,an. sJr Lacey will s,,cak in behalf
| of .he ,;iy. and the closing argument will
| Ia. 1radc by Judge John A. Campbell an,:
| james II. Eustis. on behalf OF; the Ciiatta-
nnrr. Ra;lrnad Compauy,
The Board of Administrators Of the City
Counrii having refused to entertain the
clai,r of Nayor Conway ;or 5000 for al
,crcd cxrendit,res uu,,rr the contingent
/, t,;rd ~. G;nf, mop month. the x-Mayor has
,,ronrb, suit ia the Eighth District Court 70
rcrovrr .hc same
| lie relies mon ordinance :i5G, of Leoyy's
! DIGEST of Ci,v Ordinances, which apprO-
r,i;,tcs SxtN uer month as a contingent fund
! t,r the N,rnr and he claims in his bill from
INV, 1919 To March. 1870,
| Sirs lane Wetmorc widow OF the Ia te
, pnLor. Unroocl, Wa,mnre has hro,,sh, suit
| ne.nrp Jr,loe Dihble 20 recover S;,.,.35 from
No wn,,,,i "A AND r.nevoleut ,ifc Ass,r
ancc Association of Louisiana. She sets II %
that her husbands life was insured bv s.id
comuapy on the third Of June, 1870, and
| that he died in July. 1870: that as there
were .925 members on the roll at the time
oi7bis death, she is entitled to that amount
y. The ya,c of one dollar per head.
! s. n;.,,;., 1.o,,,,
-, S.,, y.
ire "a, % w. a ~ 49," Nv. -" ~, ~.
lon.' 90 =" "an,.=r Ss-,, ,nr recorIing ;rven.
,,,,ors. ,,n,,er,v in Succession cases
=, n,.o;an... +o,'.,s nf+he Ierisl,,nrc nassed
IN .,',a,.i",,e. win ar,irlc Io3 ~. tho state
| ,.nrs+;.r+;nn was nm L,t,re The Si.th Dis
| ,r,'.. cow, ,,nnn :, tri.l i,et.re :. iurv The
~ , 49,; 49, n.,;si,.',ra " ,',,,r sv,,,;..h nr
S,r-hwor-h h bn.es his claim are ac. No. 81
If 1850. and act No. 1Jo of 1870.
IN. E,ar,i Of ADMINISTRATORS HAVING de.
| Glued :, nav .Lo demand made upor them
=. Sur.,Ivur.h hr,uni,t this suit SO that his
.r1in, ,.ioh. ne rasscd upou by 4 iury.
Co'oneI A. p. Field. rcprrsentinc Bcr-
.,..nd C,aycyie. appeared before Judge
Cooley. and obtained the discharge OF his
Client from prison. on the ground of the
'ornality OF the commitment on the charge
.or libe! and obtaining money under false
prc;enc.s. and upon another charge. because
there is no snch crime known as ''lnalicious
! prosecution.
j.Lge Cooley said that Il mar could not
Ic arrested and confined in prison simply oI
. re fi}"' f!iN OF any citizen or ofhcer lhelt
mus. 'e !: re~ul''r a''''"'i'. sc..'uS i'i !,
S.."s.thsi.!ll' :'e critic ."iii''i'''e''' VI ''
-e:e" l" nave o'e" ."iIiih'''r"' .;,...
IA I'!- instance ''e'c "''S no '.i''''i,.
.H'>, lA' ia" MAO 't'n '"'lPiG'' WILL "i''
! .it !'..>o'rS mus. "e "'sc."1Heu' ,
''"''' I .', -,A
street i>"''ro"" >"se.
! ';"Icf t"l!ens has dissolved the injuhc
! ton i; ken out 10y j. II. iounS et ais, vs.
III" Magazine street Kaiiroad Company
aHH allowed Sooo damages IN etch OK tn'
three suits against loHng G Michel, "
So!ldc.
Fo"rtn Distr'c' to"r'.
Iile case OF r. Laricu. suing C"lcnel b''
mon;cil, the keeper Of the g.niectlonery a
tue corner OF tanai ana H"aipon siietI,