The New York herald., 1871-12-10

accomplished.
rn.,. !. mi. ,.sa follow ,s..
sns d @ e.s D a
divided .mSns TSssd fss.
% ss g. s;
'hs, connoy sitting cheek ow with VIA.
.ssss.. ana ,ss:; pro
SSn.0 ss was vs..
when p.psr. made .s.in.. tweed there
TO he
molly. Green .mp, Connolly. deputy. ..s,scs to
siIa seii. had CONSENTED or & ' to break
controlling new York hn.Sse: S:A appointing Green hi.
but y. not tnowp bow ons ss Tpud maintain
~: s sSss
s nss OF OF ss s a;:s
10 1s ;S S mss SU% .
general and not specific The fraud: we're charged com
MT G0nnoy ANA he .. % these they
placing their hands he asked Tor time me until
BE- s' Mr.
'Ganpiz s4 szsss eSs. NJ H. Ssns SoSsuoy doe. deny IT,
aT Ss see tnaa turning % sS the testimony
Mr.. o'Coson-Ths committee called on Mr. Connolly and
The Sabbath inervcned-a day for good well bad
~: Do
make an appointment and he does 90 But BY Mondsy AZ
before Mr. Green could enter the discharge Of
maned Office and delivered vouchers he was ruined
Hence
THE VOUCHERS MUST pE DESTROYED:
h.s no d9s n, with sd the
shrewd rweed bold daring. not learned dashing tel
trolling influence A. TO be perfectly monstrous TO allow him
sSss A. nnd
sss
lie r. M @ -. b: S charged Win ne In.
Mr. CoU1rNEY-wel, we have been weeks trying to
been tried
Many poor i dsai Sase .nslsd impfi.sa:
gully
hold SS q.
joking manner. and s.ad was entirely unnecessary for
s be hs oe %
s nd then 1
nounced iSs dsnI.: Too genera ana w :, '' -'' ~
| TOO INsIaNi, IoANr FOR NOTICE.
The merc % M % thar there m no C not
IN M s Sr.on M II. aS hs d
that Tho e @ - ss denial Is made b' Connolly Of par
MIR oConor sued this criticism 70 some length to show
i. .ssa.a q. bis
would be Impossible to convic. him Of perjury on single
s,fs !Ds s %.
he &c % @ IL
ought to .ppo,n. Isi.es in New .ork 3 TAKE all ths
!hs; Issp,ar coDnoy ls 'Ss, .aods!
moi n:
svidsnes Of hi. having such s.erci.s
r., oanns msSs NOV, IT,
| office few years since poor but he
%e ss re s H OF coa
lie w, sSns under The ssyss Of Mayor hall and
clam
can regard Connolly in any otner light than
him on two grounds First on the inssncieney Of the
e. sha second because nc H guilty Of neglect nothing
| Aramlnent Of Mr.. Beach.
WILLIAM A. BEACH followed saying he had no such in
eret IN lhe th. case which
on wse m %
@ the 6a M and the and ee.
h reason that be !. uaacs 70 pFodaes ,he amount q
reputation lnser prison until bis psrssSiors
lying agaiHs Mayor Hall in sl case a: merely eennica
dy.. more Than tseaaea there danger q his
IN which connoy and Han PLACED NJ React ihsnDro
Is denied thai Mayor Hall the head of this Board of
Mayor Hall ana andonD.edly ssssms hm h!ahy: MAYOR
o pssr At sSas 1s
1ys OF s, y: ssi'ssS 5
be held n & m undmnshed bail for neglect Of duty
=. MAYOR HALL: THE pIsrIsersIEp SOCIALIST.
e. Sss
;s. oanay 5f,'n in jan TA s' said that
private room from Watson ihs area! coneoc,or Of
S. ns 's % aos q
~ s' 70 ny S : ss 4:
connoly but hs argued from entirely false premises.
oppS.sIee 70 tSs moving
y % s ~o n
T sasT ss . o far Is: "
s.saas sssrss. @ .is: Hs:
s .a he Ia. ana rssn II. H: al .ns
win that Of Fssta,% Ss!9I. a% liz intended
rss the Connolly
here established I Of correction in New York
'ssy s Ss::
VII consider sA. HI. duty .'''fs TSs Isss paes1.
ss s n no 1aa SS on s pa i o Of aSn
serted on Information and belief based on his being
cause they would prove runous aud
Ssns @ f II as S.s
youchsrsp That not eyasivc statement proves
:,,s 'a ss:;
lost Why SIR the question Of rights our liberty to
| be settled In this way by the
| rAsoY INAGININGs OF DISTINGUISHED COUNSEL?
know. when gentleman like the Deputy Attorney Gen.
eral appears before Judge extra judicial Intention given
10 him. have the Judiciary OF New go down
under other Influences but In this Court nothing
the kind Ihavc right to demand here equal
ton for client have the right TO claim that client
10 not about to ny and have the right TO demand that
shall decide upon afdavits before you whether
there any warrant for belief that CONNOLLY any
completely Ia these frauds. Counsel the stolen money
traced Tweed and other unknown parties
parties who they2 IL Connolly Of hem2 there
proof that he Is? Who has such proof
under the bitterness with which Connolly has pros
ecnted, we have one Of the mos. far-fetched srgu-
| peua heard. The only claim
| they make IL that Connolly was negligent,
that these bills obviously fraudulent that they could
be easily detected Now, here may be question Of law
consideration the part Of Your Honor Counsel pro.
ceeded the provisions OF the law relative 70 the au.
dung and paying OF Bills maiutsInng that the Comptroller
opy acted minserlaiiy that he Obliged
aftsr ng the Board OF Audit Now the question II
| net whether this was law, but