The Jasper weekly courier. [volume] (Jasper, Ind.) 1858-1922, 1871-03-31
Dubois Circuit Court.

Dubois Circuit Court.
This Court has been in session hi
week. and has had mere lhigatcd bust
ness before il, than at any former tern
for many years. This Is Judge Malott'
first court in our county. and his mod
"sprcsi'ling and rulings have justif tn
highest expectations Of his numerous
friends, in regard to his eminent fitness
for the position which he has been in
duced TO occupy, and has given almos
universal satisfaction. Hon. {. 5. Dob
bins prosecuted as far rs criminals would
-Wrmit him, but there being no large
e State cases, most Of those arrested en-.
tered pleas Of guilty. and were assessed
small fines.
The following is the disposition of the
u canseS:
State VS.. Ben. Wright = bigamy-con-
tlnucd Cor process.
State vs. Pickctts Assault and battery
- continued for process.
State VS.. Richey Grand Larceny
continued for process. ii
State VS.. Acknowledgements contin-
ucd for process.
State VS.. HOLSTER Grand I.arccny-
continued for process.
State VS.. Crccelius -Pcrjury-Indict.
ment quashed.
State va. A. Meier Assault and bat
terry Defendant plead his own case be-
Tore jhry-found guilty; fine SIS.
State VS.. NJ. Fritz Assault and battery
= guilty fine 81:
2 State VS.. Schraker Assault and bat
terry guilty; fine 81.
Gwin VS.. Danhoefer-On contract
This case has been on docket for ciybt
years. and finally was tried BY Jury.
which gave Judgment for plaintiff for
S6O45.
Farris vs.. OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES
-ment for plaintifl.
Gardner vs.. Vcnnc.nan On note to.
Illinois Central Insurance Companv-
dismissed at plaintiffs costs, OH failure
TO set up good cause Of action.
Is. B. Edmonston vs.. County Board
Appeal from order Of Board refusing TO
make allowance dismissed ut plaintiffs
rosts.on iniimation tl,ut Judgment would
20 against him. 4
Huber VS.. Bruckcr Judgment for
plaintiff for 500.
Sci'''ntcrinan VS.. Jung ct. al.-jul--
mrnt for plaintiff for Se3.2s.
Harmon ". Harmon Divorce re. !,
fused either party.
Boin vs.. Miller dismissed by arrcc.
mcnt.
MrMahin vs.. Observation-Disclosures, for r
s39.3;. a
Eouscicr VS.. Rise -forcclosurc-iudg. 5
mcnt Tor SEAL for Rousclcr. and s,Cs J
for Schcurich and sale ordered, q
Isickclman VS.. Kunst- dismissed. :
Sagcl vs. Scgars judgment fork7 Ga. T
Engelhard vs.. Simmons -judcmcn, {
for l248s. e
Hobbs vs. Bloom, CT. al.-iudpmcn, 4
for $42s.23 Il
Nogcl VS.. Hoffman two cases ono -
dismissed and Judgment in one for sa25 "
Gardner vs.. Gosnan damages dis Is
missed. N
Green vs.. Corn-judgment for sseo. 80 CO
Ballard VS.. Scrmcrshcim = dismissed n, IL
defendants costs. al
Ballard VS.. Edmonston dismissed ac. );
CT trial at defendants costs. Fl
Engcll,arl VS.. MalterAd dismissed y, N
plaintiffs costs.
IlansclInan VS.. Ferguson ,.o
dismissed at plaintiffs costs. =
Lewis VS.. Rcnncr- Judgment for :, =
AA6.2o ~
Chricl vs.. Acknowledgment for !.
'5I.68 SC
Miller VS.. Burkc-l'artition ordered. i. !.
Engclhard VS.. Kunklcr- judgment for :.
'6O.35. al
State VS.. McNcrny, Schottncr, Rcscr-
We indictments for retailing to minors &c
pleas Of guilty fine So in each case. M
Campbcllvs. Stewart damage --judg- ~
lent for defendant. co
Town Of Jasper VS.. Jos. Friedman al
Judgment for defendant. sal
Court adjourned Thursday evening. &c
&c docket being cleaned up entirely.
ad
RAILROAD PErrrIox.-A petition for co1
election in Columbia town ship in this : i
'unty, upon the question of subscribing -,
x thousand two hundred and eighty :,
ollars, TO aid ia tho construction of the IN,