Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1871-06-20
LAW
Second Circuit COurt-HaIsey, Judge.

Second Circuit COurt-Halsey, Judge.
The following calendar OF cases which
have been passed on sCcOuu OF the Alb
sence of counsel, will be called to-day.
When it is brought to the knowledge Of
the Court that counsel are in the Supreme
Court, their cases will be passed and
stand As the first cases for trial At the
September Term, 1871.
2S0l, McKinavy vs. Picksrd; 2S73, Ayd-
lett vs. James 4 Co; 1902, Shuber VS. Raw
linRs; 2909, HALEY vs. Jones; 1921, Red
ford vs. Wolf & Co.; 1922, same vs. same;
1924, SeesseI & Son VS. Ksliski; 1927, Free
man vs. McLefresh & Co; 1881, White VS.
Carter ct al; 1892, Edwards vs. Jefferson
294l, RsdfOrd vs. Wolf & Co 29f2, Hsis-
OF Memphis vs. James; 2959, Devine vs. NJ.
st. r. r, Gsrnishees; 1852, GeOrgenthum
vs. E~tcheVsrne; 1864, Bachmsn vs. Gies;
2965, Amar VS. anne 1913, Wilet vs. SpOrs
& Co.; 2g75, Damn vsSemmes & Co, ct al;
2g7S, Thornton VS. Johnson ct al; 2979, Da-
mon VS. Wesmer; $3.50, Smith VS. PidgeOn;
2gS7, Dauriac vs. Cabous 1884,
VaccarO & Co. VS. Scheifers; 29SS,
CloustOn VS. Crock; 29S9, Mshsn IS Tsy-
Tor, McEwin & Blew; 1884, Everett VS.
Flaherty; 1926, Meath VS. Street ct al;
1898, Specht, executor, VS. Sawyer; 5000,
Smith vs. Garrett ct al; 1901, lien vs Cor
roma & Co; 1902, Austin VS. City OF Mem
phis; S003, Sharp vs. Austin; 1904, Thurs
ton vs. Mahsn; 1905, Shrsyer vs. Wright ct
al; SOO6, Hutchinson ct al vs. Hsmpe; SOO7,
Curry vs. PlUmmer; 30lO, Nenable vs.
Swearinger; SOP, New York Life Insur-
snce Company VS. Ralford; 80l6, Doug
lass, uss, etc VS. Cahour & Co; 30I9, Brooch
vOgel vs. Green ct al; 1920, Richmond vs.
Newark Mschine Works; 3024, Randle &
Heath vs. EverdOn; 1881, Kean vs. Board
of School Commissioners of Memphis;
1892, ~Shernberg VS. Memphis and Ohio and
Louisville and Nashville Railroad Compa-
mics; 1888, Oliver, Ftnnie q Co. VS. Mem
phis and Louisville Railroad Company;
1904, Mageyney vs. Happsk; 3035, Frank &
Co. vs. Allen; 3036, Frank VS. same; 5040,
Humss & POston VS. Emmett Bank; 3O4I,
Whitemors VS. Cook; 3O43, Msgevney vs.
Happek; 3O46, Gauter Us Schroeder; S049,
Levitt & Co. VS.. Hartley ct al; 305l, Roper
& Bro. VS. Clements; 1882, Same VS.
same; 3053, Baxter & Smith vs. Beasley;
3O57, McCleary vs. Hartley q Gurley; 5000,
Sherwood VS. Herman; 1869, O'DOnneu VS.
Memphis and Louisville Railroad COM
pany; 800, Fleming vs. SpOre; 3077, |
Reynolds & Sloan vs. ROescher; 3O7S, Wild
rig VS. Hester; 3079, same VS. same; 1880, |
VS. same; $685.. ROOss vs. Smith; 30SS, |
Gurins vs. BabcOcB; 1902, Trustees Wash.
College VS. Cook; 1907. Robertson
vs. AhIh oAuAa AAuAAuA NE AAA4kDuLubf |
agent; 3l02. Hamilton We Frank; BIOS, /
Greer vs. Bannon; Sll2. Ertch VS. Arthur; |
Cherighino vs. Sonlan3ack; 1921, Tenn
VS. Jaqust; 1926, Kennedy VS. JEFF
& Co.; 2iZ7, Malone VS. same; S12S, |
VS. Overall; 1929, Franklin vs.
Southern Express Company; 3l34, Hill VS.
Shorter; 3l35, Eislsnd VS. McCloy & Co; |
3iSS, Memphis Gsyoso Gas Company VS.
CloustOn; SAC, Cappurro vs. First Nation
al RAM of MnnnhfGa 21n1 Onward VS. 1
Donovan ct al; 1912, same vs. same; BIAS, |
Durham VS. Cameron; 1853, Daniel vs.
Mercle ct al; 1854, Robertson VS. Daniel:
1857, Morgan VS. Gurley; 1850, Crotty VS.
Robertson ct al; 1852, SeabOld vs. MOrgan's
1858, Flynn VS. same; 1854, Bilbow
vs. Cox; 3l6S, City of Memphis vs. Church;
BIO, same VS. Creamer; Sl72, same vs.
Chicsrz0la; 3l73, same vs. Bsttaila; 8l75,
VS. same; 8l77, same vs. Herger; 5l7S,
same VS. Evans; 1929, Smith and wife vs.
Bullock.
Flrst Clr0Rlt Court-heiskell, Judge.
The Jurors in this court are notified to
be present this morning at 9 O'Clock. The
following constitutes the special calendar
Of cases continued over on the regular call
of the absence Of attorneys at the
Court, which will be called to-
lay, viz; "a, Hearn vs. Young; los, Union
Bank vs. Williams, exit ~, Bill, dumfs
vs. Wright; $50, Payne vs Payne; IA, Ro-
vs. Feldman 277, Francisco &
Wiggin VS. Brinkley ct al; 278, Mason vs.
.snnie OF al; 81, Weaver, trustee, vs.
Jleayes; go, Walton vs. Greenlsw; 81,
Donovan vs. Pointer; S89, McLemOre VS.
Equitable Life Assurance Society; 42l,
Witt as Rosenbaum; al, Coward vs. COun-
y Court; bS2, Montgomery, use. vs. Pull
lam, eX'r; 554, LOWensteln vs. Ksufman;
Hargan vs. German Savings Institu-
ga, Warwick vs. Jefferson; $50, La
,ey & McGhee vs. Brown; 5S2, same vs.
Niegand, adm'x; 647, MeGsvock VS. Lar
lin; 655, Mayor and Aldermen vs. Fitz- .
Cos, Gibson VS. Elliott; 67I, Ben
es vs. Wtldberger, sdm'r; IA, Mayor
nd Aldermen vs. Staid Isl, same ,
q Beuer 760, same VS. Staid F: F,
79, Jenny vs. Hesse, Levy & Co; 7S8,
Warehouse p q Co. vs. Robbins & Co.
80, StOYesll vs. Ferguson: sos, Dibble vs. ,
doneils; SIS, Shaw vs. Oallan; sig. Bauer .
BAIL vs. Hesss, Levy & Co.; 8S7, Wal !
ace vs. MRletestsi 64S, Church vs. Rob ,
ins; $50, Hesohen, Krite & Co. VS. Hesse.
& Co.; 672, Laski VS. Mayor and Al
S95, Powell q Bush VS. Black 3
,ros; goo. Oicalla vs. Taylor; 9l3, Stod- !
ard VS. Ogden; 919, Mayor and Aldermen
3 Mare; Q2S, Singleby vs. Gray ct al;
"a, National Br. Bank vs. Check & M; G25,
vs. Fealy; 942, Hine vs. BrittOn; I
81, Cook vs. Cook; 973, CieallaVs Taylor; /
"a, MeHenry " Crook; Sl8, Park vs.
.avv. Qs5. Griffin vs. Block; go, Frsyzsr