The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1871-08-25
THE COURTS.
LEGGED Fraudulent Transfer Of Property-A d.
vorce Suit FORGETTING Bail-Dscisions.
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.

AllsGod Fraudulent Transfer Of Property.
The decision in the subjoined case relates to q
sansaction in which the government are plaintins'
nd allege that the defendants, against whom they
I'D obtained Judgment and execution, had made
fraudulent transfer OF properly for the purpose Of
hvadng the payment OF the Judgment
The United States os. Joseph II. Stiaer Cornelius
! Dankle, GeOrgtnd Ddnr,e bernard Heller ana
doph Isadcson.-Ye Yesterday Judge Blatchford
endered his decision In the above entitled suit:
The action was brought on creditors bill, based
n Judgment which was recovered by the
Jnited States IN suit IN the District Court
galnst the de endants, Stiner, Cornelius J. Danke
nd Heller, on the Esd OF March, 1870. tbs judS.
aent was docketed against these parties on the Io9
fMarcn, 1870, for ST. o4o On the execution issuea
N this judgment $106 ~ was made, The MarsnaIs
Expenses being $l09 ID. Less this sum OF $lo6 ~
he Judgment and execution remain unsausneo'
sipsi ana the others az sureties in . stipulation
gwen for release OF properly seized IN suit In re
brought by the United States against SUCH prop
brty found on the dlsrilery premises OF Stlner Tor
forfeiture OF the same or alleged violation OF the
Fevenue law. The bill was brought 70 reach some
real estate Thrtythird and twenty nftn streets.
which formerly belonged TO Cornelius j. Danke,
ecor %taII pe,eIbsr To- issS at ity I've minutes
past two P. NJ, conveyed to the defendant Isaac
Son. VINO. by lease dated November J. 1889, ana
Dankle, ana which Isaacson conveyed to the de-
PENDANT, Georgna DanKle, wife Of Cornelius Danke,
corded May IA, 1870. Alter the execution Of the
stipulation and prior TO the recovery OF Inc Judgment
In QueSLlOu, ana NJ OF before lWeiVo OOiOCk uoOu
on December 70, 1862 the jury rendered verdict IN
the suit for the forfeiture condemnng the property
eeized, whereupOn decree o. condemnation was
duly entered. The bill alleged that the instruments
above referred to were maze without consideration
aud not In good faith, but with the connivance OF
the two Dankles aud lsaacson Tor tne purpose Of
deirauding the government and transferring 10
Georoina Dankle the ostensible ownership OF the
property, IN view OF the liability OF Cornelius !:
Dankle under the stipulation ne had gwen, ana
the rendering OF the verdict and decree, and the
Judgment and execution issued upon that verdict,
DO as TO prevent the government from levying upon
faction OF their recovery and demand. The Dill
prays for injunction to restrain the Dauk!es anu
1saacson from alternating or encumbering the
property in question: and for receiver OF the prop
erty of Stiner, Cornelius J. Danke and Hell
Ter. To this bill an answer was !led ~ the
Dankles to the erect that when nanne c0nse Ie
plainllifs any money and did not become Judgment
creditors OF his until March 25 lS70 and that the Goa
veyance to IsaacsOn was made in pursuance OF an
agreement made prior to November l, 1862 by which
cash payment OF 5000 was 10 be made by isaac
to Dankle the delivery OF the deed and Isaac
make other payments secured by mortgage Isaac
son not being able to pay the notes, made an
agreement with her to sell her the premises premises
and the premises were conveyed to her, 1t Is
claimed that the plaintifs were not Judgment cred
itors at the time OF the conveyance to lsaacson or
at the time OF the conveyance to Mrs. Dankle.
After going through the facts and law Of the case
1T considerable length the Judge suggests that an
dispute exceeds the sum OF $500, and then an In.
junction Will issue enolning Dankle from
making amy Of any Of h property
making any transfer of said real estate and from
encumbering the same, and a receiver VIII be ap-
pointed Of said real estate and Of all the property:
equitable interests, things In action and effects OF
pankle. II notice of the motion Is not necessary as
TO Stner ana Heller, the receivership Will extend
to their property.
Thomas Slmons, Assistant District Attorney, for
the plaintins; John Winslow FOR Dankle and wife.