The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1870-02-23
NEWS FROM WASHINGTON.
ncb,tc on the RiIl for the Re
no,al OF disabilities.
L. IlnnAc Of REPRESENTATIVES, on Nor

no sto;cd Yesterday.
~. H1-TLTT. of Massachusetts, from
... ,aamitt, &C on Reconstruction, reported
-. nc senate hill for the removal of po-
.., ,;s,h;Iilics from certain persons in
.,n l. embraces about eight hum
,ns
y WuITTENtORE, Of South Carolina,
.ho some committee. reported as an
""'" -, '' tbo 1Inusc hill containing about
"Ea''"''> aIro, additional names.
c'S''I n,! 7,i'3 said he would allow nil the
~ .. ~ for debate if gentlemen do.
~. :.
" cox. Of New York. objected TO this
..... o.; selecting nance md dealing out
.--.at Il. and E. ami argued that il
a.,,ofhn nchr,r of the whole country
.,. sr, nr general amnesty should be
..s ami hc WAS opposed 70 voting for
- This character.
" HITLER SID the case WAS urrcnt in
-. ....;o tic removal Of the disabilities Of
.....f those named in the bill. He wns
.- .,n~ also oC > General hill. But one of
.... ..ni would a;ye rise 70 too much dis
-.,. u. and delay loo lang the pardon of
.......,.. o were necessary 10. some State 60
.,....,,.s, In tlr South.
V~. EE0pES. ot New York. denounced
....'v...r ,.,tc,n Of nr,)linr out rardons
81. a&l" ,siv. AMI lie would stand here in
g., .....a,I vote against this measure If
...j alone and no ono else voted with
u.r., mi. ~ th;s choroc.cr wero
.r+irco6 ;nto ranrrcss hc hal pro-
..:,,-, mann 1rf hn voted for tbom
- ,'ro,r 80 If the ma io~;tv tAst each
... W.. ~, Xiii was to bc followed by nm act
.,-a, amnesty. Hut that nrt ~ cnn-
.~r..., mover canr },+ Tho UTrso
,.n c,,,rorc3 - ,odi;nn o,t ror,Jons
.:r;5,,o1. 60; -, H.. -, lii ,ba,o
%, '|,,'i' . I'N' ~ ,nI' ~ ',1 nha hoS
' 'Y.'' - '' thn ,n,.+ cr;'n", IN tnn
~. Ill.,, ~ , Wv ~, "' In,ht nnch - ~
,ha nn.,,nc, - .n,nn If tho
~. .,n Son7b hn. thcra was oIso
g." o., NV '>?"'!', ""' ,t.v'' r,a ",S9
]-,@.' ~ ~ 49, 49, .tn;a ..,,o ,uia
"S.. '',,a ,,aT;aat 49,. A.
:! I'LL '"'4. ''',"SS anu '"''",,s VI"
l.">G' '"' ~ rH' .e Us
;e-,'' ''' - ''ou W ta's ''Li,' ns WHY
''''"' 80 .'% '.-0f's .i'. , "''.. .i' ra
.@' "n oi 'nc'" -. 'iie ,"iot my nav
'"0',rA III 0a''!S. - IN II! ., Jos n w..
..."8-" Inc '",'"' "i.' - - ~. t sna',,
."ih"">'' 'ne "''' '':. % . r"e - ' .hs
-'.'iri sdcH MaSlaNliNo"S 'eiinS ~ INC
'..'rr We IN" j1St 'oI';u Nv w
H. ~ could wish that that man was sun
....r the Genera! than the politician. what
Ill. the Confederate forces ID When 'hese
generous terms were onereu ~" 'heS 20
TO the >wamps Of South Carolina, as Ma
ZION and Sumter did. and col'i'n 10 ravaee
tie county Did they 20 into the last
'..,~rs II The AlIeGhaMcS. ana from th'a
.rai COSTUME u warfare! Did they act
sc >ran'4r,ls, or Spanish Americans, OF
Ike McAicans: No: but when they gave
~, r@2;r arms on the field they gave up all,
conquered and aHhtUr1 ana IL 1t not now
t..c u heal Ill WOUNDS ana welcome Sill
.... rcoglc back, We Lave already I'M
81 more upon the pcoI}c OF the South
..ma was ever before imno,cl up0n any
,.u,,.,r u any country. - white man was
.,.r before subjected to the African IL
..g..,."s were ever before made slaves e
t.r.r former scryan5>. a. ma been the case
s.. The Sou;h. l. not This revenge enough
81. does this House want m0rc revenge over
lie rcorle Of the South, lie arncalcd tc
80. lions, 10 do Justice II these southern
,u.,.Ic.
Mr. HErE. of Kentucky. EXPRESSED sur.
me that Mr.. Books should declare tina.
o y."ll not vote fer this bill. lie, too
Wa opposed 10 this system o! pcdiIns par
rs; Int because VIC could not get q gene
al hill he would rot keep thc eighteen hun
..ci and more names mentioned il THE
tl!l I'll; Of the privileges of the law.
Mr.. VAN TRUMP, Of Ohio, sand Mr.
iH"u.S was not alone, because he MT. VA:
IarNr) would vote against the bill.
Mr.. BECk was aware q that lact' EN-
was surprised at i. ,,,
Mir. EtbkHEES, OF lntlaHi, shou'