Staunton spectator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1896, 1870-03-22


Y Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty. the It'll day of March, 1870, Samuel Shack
lett in his own right, and as sole surviving part
ner of the late partnership concern of Shacklett
& Rruffy, composed of himself and George Bruf-
fly, dec ......... Plaintiffs,
Samuel Hildebrand Jacob R. Hildebrand as
executor of Michael Hildebrand, ST., decd, and
debrand, Henry Hildebrand, Gabriel Hide
brand, Abraham Hildebrand, B. f Hildebrand,
admir- of Michael Hildebrand, Jr., decd; Mar
tina Miller, John Haney, and Peggy, his wife;
Jacob r. Hildebrand, trustee for said Peggy
Haney and her children-John, Daniel, Eliza
beth, and William Haney-and said John Ha-i
ney, Daniel Haney Elizabeth Haney, and Will
liam Haney in their own DECENTRALIZATION
The object of this suit is to attach any interest
to which the nonresident defendant, Samuel
Hildebrand, may be entitled, in the real and per-
sonal estate of his father Michael Eidebrand,
ST., dec d, in the hands of Jacob r. Hildebrand
his executor, and in the real or personal estate of
Michael Hildebrand, Jr., decd in the hands of
of B. +. Hildebrand, his admir-; and especially
the interest of said Samuel Hildebrand in q tract
of land situate in Augusta county, supposed to
contain about 40 acres, of which said Michael
Hildebrand,. Jr., died sliced and possessed, end
the will of Michael Hildebrand, ST., decd,
of record in the County Court of Augusta,
Will Book No. Al, page 49S, or sufhciency
thereof to satisfy to the plaintiff the of $105.
81, with interest thereon from Cne ora DAY OF
March, 1852. and the costs Of this proceeding.
The defendant Henry Hildebrand not having
entered his appearance, and it appearing by sat.
isfactory evidence that he is not resident of this
Commonwealth: 1t is ordered that he do appear
here within one month after due publication of
this notice and do what is necessary to protect
'''' ''''' ]. n. RYAN, D. G.
SMITH 81 ELDER, p. q. mar15-4w
VIRGINIA :-At rules held in the Clerks
Y office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty, the 7th day of March, 1870,
Jacob Crist and John w. Dickerson, Plaintiffs,
AGAINST
Jacob S. Swink. administrator of Jacob Ewing.
decd, Catharine Ewing, widow of said dece-
dent, James Ewing, Elizabeth III. Hahn. B. j.
Mason, and Rebecca, his wife, George Coiner
and Susan his wife, Eliza Ewing. - Ewing,
and Jacob Ewing, ......... ".. defendants.
The object of this suit is to enforce the ven
doris lien on house and lot in Spring Hill.
The defendants James Ewing and - Ewing,
not having entered their appearance, and it APP
pearing by satisfactory evidence that they are
not residents of this Commonwealth: 1t is order
ed that they do appear here within one month
after due publication of this notice, and do what
is necessary to protect their interest
A copy-teste j. N. RYAN, D. G.
TROUT, p. q. marl5-4w
THVHE COMPREHENSIVE OF Young
Il s. REESE, druggists was, by mutual con-
sent, dissolved on Feb 1st., 1870. DR.. Reese,
having purchased LUO Interest VI LIZ. Will
continue the drug business under the same name
of Young & Reese. DR.. Young remains with
the new concern, and will be glad to serve his
friends and D. old customers B z; E EGfN
VIRGINIA AT rules held in the Clerks
Y Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty, the It'll day of March, 1870,
George E. Price who sues for himself and such
of the unsatisfed creditors of the estate of Alan
son Harris, decd, who will come in and contrib
I. go 10 of 10
Plaintiffs,
Rudolph Turk, administrator of estate of Alan
son Harris, decd, james II. Harris, George Har-
ris Franklin Harris, Alexander harris, Ihomas
Walker and - Walker his wife, llate Harris),
Eb. Simpson and Mary Simpson,. his wife, Gate
Harris) Martha Harris and William r. Harris,
heirs and distributes of said Alans so Harris,
Qs'ss'Se'i In 0jHiiiiAANCERY.
The object of this suit is to obtain a settlement
of the estate of Alanscn Harris, and to obtain a
decree for the sale of the real property descend
ed and out Of the same for the payment of the
debts due from said estate
The defendants Thomas Walker and Walk
er, his wife, (ate Harris) not having entered their
appearance, and it appearing by satisfactory evil
dence that they are not residents of this Com
monwealth: 1t is ordered that they do appear
this notice, and do what is necessary to protect
'n marsm4 ivS' j. n. RYAN, D. c.
EcHoLs BELL. & CATLETT, p. q.
VIRGINIA AT rules held in the Clerk S
Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty, the Tth day of March, 1870,
William Crawford ............... Plaintiff,
AGAINST
John d. Imboden, Michael G. Hartman and Will
liam H. CARRIER ........ Defendants,
IN CHANCERY.
The object of this suit is to enforce vendor s
lien for $250.OO with interest from 18th january;
1854. on house and lot in Staunton. part of ''Old
Bell Tavern" being West corner brick house.
The defendant, William H. CARRIER, not hav-
ing entered his appearance, and it appearing by
satisfactory evidence that he is not resident o.
this Commonwealth It is ordered that he do APP
pear here within one month after due publica-
ton OF this notice, and do what is necessary tt
protect his interest. A copy-teste,
TROUT, p. q. j. N. yam, u. Y.
march0--4w