New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1870-10-24
THE COURTS.
THE Ju,frL EsTATE.-DI OF THE SUIT To
OBTAIN POSSESSION.

t re,oyer OF tile Junel cs,a'e WIS
w ,,, a., a d,smis saI of the complaint with costs
and resulted III , 10000, q, s,o ooo From the
and an allowance 20 tne Soi Cor the de-
statements OF Mr. Charles 81 m tb U e9ue
PENDANT which were is a. salvage" cases
Wherein the lawyer endeavOr to obtain for III,
client receiving ia ieau IN III, p case beinS person known
s Gecrge the GoI ahs ease unlike most salvage
the lawyer appeared 10 We Nv, ~ III fonr or single wit
day had he single eneht ou, ~ hat OH ATTEMPTS TO
attendance lie even Se aite e had Ied and
this and the further gio ~, o IA nnt bestate
verify their hat the Count was ever
authorized TO appear ~ sd 9 ,t"nsses but called
continued the Goni ssf Of Judge barnard
by whom he wished 10 Prov IN, nnt .,o 600 maid
tual value OF the Ppop tifv the claims Of the plaintiffs
when Madam Jumel's VIII was Dfoke Dit' hat,St
and broadway, in 1895, was worth 100000 ,o.,,eo,
Mr. OConor was next called pH tne Non. a II1h hnt
knew Of no purchases sales that could be guide to
him; he had behrh peoP,c l,iy , 80 81 nronertv
there at 5000 to 1900 per acre. his own properly
was not for sale or in the market ne had ec 0 p
acre for the bulk OF IL, and Tor some bDou so" Pi
| mere he did not know how much he himself owned
from IL to lG acres; he did not Know what ne Naucu
| at il Was not for sale. go -. A.,
Count rested his case on this and the ioS Count e 'Sf
TO set aside the will was commenced. The Count S'
Mr. Carter then opened for the defendant ana asked
If any Of the monstrons charges onetenh Of them
! hulD of
tbev we're fully prepared to disproye them; but Mr..
Chase had other attacks to meet, aud 1t was hardly
%hoe defense unless there was something to call for
IL The only thing that was attempted to be proved
wasue way that the property was worth from half mil
lion to million g sagrs Wa But adeaaey Of price
was mo- reason for setting aside deed unless there
frnd inducing It's seapd sana Of Mr. Chase in making
f fsIIe Teprcs S to the Jone-es
Judge BarnardLInN portion vi ,ie nj Vo,p tdn rn
naming that of insufficient consideration. ,n.,o
Mr. Carter then saa tnat tnT Stnad incdentnliy
in the complaint and formed no part OF 'ng gause Ind
tOn And lnadequacy Oh % th a AID 49, tory
Ted in did ae mot eos With Clear and their
which constituted the alleged cause OF ACTON were M
r o n1 NOT listen 70 the question Of the nadequacy
~ the consIde%tion There was evidence TO show that
VI ' ~ IA Mt lnnu, that the property WAS worth
nS "a oo he" thew released their title 10 it, II was man
hsy o oar t With their right TO the estate for 10000
weeks after the will was set they went get their
and received it and they were present the trial
n 70 That where n was conceded that the proper
| =, wss worth 81 1O0O The complaint was a manifest
ialSchoou mn, i no ol III, III "a, - tr,tb in II
there was no, p"r,c,g comes NM Mr. Carter said
inc ,iuc a. y. ~ S,o,nt % uhase Iin a. II
I'm no hctd ~ hi beIIicose exhibition and ap
nc nIe i to me- 9onrt ~ '"''
Peau W sc ~ r, 4; only ogurative sneokine Count
| u 1uu5g n'rH"i" - 10 '''' -
Mr. Carter with ygor)-That is the question inquire
- hnss lie IA IN There il somebody else behind
The naintifs seeking his own ends and his
| nnrpnses Before this man came there peace
from bis own Statement that having partaken Of the
hnantaitv NJ Mr. Chase he listened at the domestic
and dnsher with knighty chvarous spirit he sprang
into ~ esno,sed the cause OF one goes inform other
neopls OF what ne learned and law suit il launched
through his nsfrumenality.
1Dunt-That ia NOT true
Mr. Carter-That is his statement, not mine who
it stated that the age of rhiNalry was passedf
Uaughter That man, whoever u was, ought 10 nave
lived where counts and members OF
have not forgotten the chlVarlc spfit Vfeat lahgh
teri The counsel referred 10 me act tlat .he euihI
was not Nerlned py the piahlns pt ~ NY ~. ~,
latter alleging az reason tha MS clients had refused 70
do II because they had 10 alh IN IA" or IaWyers ho
wondered II they hid now any reason 10 mn
faith tteneweu haSitei.l Anc iPaI 80;
was presented tne ahy pIenous u, az ta a.,
bnnal counselor Oh tne o 30 " W.. ~
COURT tS saw nothing that he didn't in good faith expect
to pr2ye and have Witnesses AT hand 10 proye-gets up
and pends hours in exaggeratng and reasserting state
OF fraud and before he gets through presents am
dav that he did not have any witnesses in court aud
could not get any OF his clients to appear! Counsel
! didn't know what was to be done with such person
other communities infested with a like pest had taken
teri Indictments had been filed against lawyers guilty
| of such conduct Perhaps some instances might be
known to the learned counsel uaughter)
Mr. Carter said that there was but one course TO take In
such The counsel then required TO the question
of the alleged nadequacy of consideration for the
yeyance and claimed that it did exist at ALL that the
plaintiffs had been literally, generously treated by
Mr. Chase in the matter He then reced the facts Of the
case that al the death Of Mime. Jumel there will
under which the plaintiffs took nothing aud il
sary to commence a suit to aside the will. They
could have undertaken controversy Of that kind
for they III distressed pecunlary condition. Ana
beside that the children OF Mr. Chase had title against
the whole world including these heirs and against the
will, they being the grandchildren of Madame Jume
Nevertheless, was convenient Tor MT chase Ia have IN
himself the TIL OF these heirs AT law Ii was an import