The Carson daily appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1865-1870, 1870-08-03

loon, gotten up with much skilI, are q!
popular as they are luxurious. Go fol
them
LECTURE THIS EvENING-We are no,
officially informed in relation to the
matter, but believe it is generally IN.
derstood there will be a lecture at Moore
l. Parker's new Hall this evening By
Mrs Laura D, Force Gordon. Subject:
Womans Enfranchissment
GovERSMENr BooKs.-Senator Stew.
art has sent to this ofice copies of the
U. s. Geological Survey of Colorado
aud New Mexico Report on Education,
and other reports of Commissioners at
the Paris Exposition. These docu-
ments are of greater general interests
than those which usually emanate from
the Public printing office.
THE ORPHANS HoME-A petition is
in circulation and being numerously
signed for the appointment of Mr.. and
Mrs. James W. Robinson to take charge
of the children who may be sent to the
above named institution. From our
knowledge Of the parties and from a
glance at the names of the petitioners,
We should judge Mr.. and Mrs. Robinson
r0Pfhv tho nj
MAJOR DUMPHV, that MANNED veteran
of the Navy, who gave 'show" here
about a month ago, returned from Cali
fornia yesterday, attracted hitler, prob
ably, by having been more fortunate
here than elsewhere. His career in
California has been unsuccessful-the
owner Of q hall at Vallejo having at.
tached his "stock in trade" The Major
il endeavoring to raise the necessary
funds to cancel the debt. 1t will be re.
membered this veteran lost both bis
arms while one ofthe crew of FarraRut's
Gag ship Hartford" in the great battle
of Mobile Bay.
In THE CIRCUIr CoURr of the United
States for the District of Nevada, on
Monday, August LIST, there were present
Judges Lorenzo Sawyer and E. W. Hill
yer, Marshal Lammou, and Clerk Dag
gett. The following cases were con-
tinued for the term: Robert Robinson
vs.. Savage N. Co. ); N. H. A. Mason vs..
New York and Silver Peak N. Co., ct
ais; Mary Ann s. N. Co., vs.. Overman
S. NJ. Co.; Dardanelle NJ. Co., vs.. Over
man N. Co; VIM. n. Brum6eld vs.. AL
fred Meyer and wife; Clinton Guernee
vs.. Duncan and Barber; VIM. S. Chap
man IS. VIM. Wslch ct ais; Putnam l.
Brier vs.. Cal. State Telegraph Co., e,
ais; Central Pacific Railroad vs.. in
B. Dyer ct ais; H. W. Flen ct ais. W.
Eberhardt Co ct ais. In the case of
VIM. Harrington vs.. F. L. Castle ct ais
at cost Of plaintiff with judg.
ment for defendant, whose counsel were
not present. NJ. Manseau vs.. E. D. Fen.
sier, judgment against defendant, whose
counsel we're not present. VAT. R.
r. vs.. Overman Co., hearing of demur-
rer passed without day. VIM. Harring-
Eou vs.. F. L. Castle ct ais; on motion
and statement Of counsel appearing for
defendant, the case was restored to the
calendar and proceedings in the case .
heretofore had this day vacated re.
erred to Judge Hillyer as special mas
er in chancery 10 try the issues and set
lie the accounts and report to fhe Court.
L. Manseur vs. E. D. Fensier on mo.
ion and statement of counsel the case
vas restored TO the Calendar and pro-
:eedings heretofore this day had in the
'ase vacated, and case set for trial on }
Tuesday, 70 which time the Court ad. l
burned. Tuesday, Ang. 2, N. Nanseur t
IS. E. D Fensier, submitted and taken :;
Inder advisement. The Court staads Y