, 1870-11-01
THE LAW COURTS.
Vn1uc of Lind Condemned LOT
The South I,nFks..
The Lasalle Street Tunnel-Bank-
ruptcy Cases.
nh. I,,,e Hea1th oGccr - Divorces
Asked For.



sbat,es q. Harv.y, A.aiEpoo In baukrupscy. T.
aler1 Crane. THIS csuse WAS gwen to the Jury
x,user 4 charge which stase1 the fact4, In sus-
stance. ~ follows: The plaintid claims a ss-
s,encc tn bankruptcy Of WIG. Tar, who, for
four ycars, and up tp the 9Th OF March iast, was
1csaiI merchant at Normal. In Mclean County.
TIC procecdtngs In bankruptcy were conn.,
Me1ced On the s.st OF March last. On the
1tn -sl2y OF Mar III the defendant took posse8tiou
oy sNc stock Of goods Of Parr in his store, and
subsequently sold them, converting the proceeds
TO his own use. This sale defendant i1sd1es un-
der Il oaA,tel uortTar-, executed on tie 9th OF
March. 1sss. duly acknowledged, given 10 secure
s. coo 1uaned by FaUf ON Crane. 1t WIS not re.
coded unit! The eth OF March last II couseyed
TO Cana iii the sfock ri Cords then. in par11a
s.err, with euch greas 3. mtRat attesward ha
sastde 10 The ftask. II Hutt:ntxt FAt1 to ain
In Io'sess On Q: the 20 d. and sell them IN the
usuAl cnur>cOf t"atl-. Tll. mortsure Is xttacke1
lsl:a.ua: First. tant 1t ~as mt mails IN soai
3llh This Is 4 4,@-:''.1 n. the lazy; but thc
Eon.t 'aFs 70 sec evidence sn.p'rting tie claim.
The evidence Is that it. Was mortgage
Tor !ssn 81 menat:y. Second: that ,he
ass:epec by zeas~n OF i failure TO reeor3 7h!r1,,
shat Is Also ynid nc 'ar 1snssss sion was tcSt IN
Pan tn 81 Fsnrn thar It Is also sod because
6DAEed That p0ssrsslun wSs tSksn txtnty slayg
btsarc The tnssIrutM" OF proceedings lit bank
znpt.y, and t".tose any CT dit or Of the aestor had
tus:ractcd ia, the f.tur- II aue% % 10 receri @ % s;s
1nt=a=e ttii not vim ,te II 10 favor Of p'ant!n,
ina.Mnch ~ ticfertaa.f IN u r3asc:siou nj tte
property before pi4t.f.n was nppoated ot had
acqutaA any rights: that the m.rtgazc is not
lnxic .yol1 by the c1"uses authorizing PAr
10 he,l In due .0asse Ut trade, iaasnnca
ns cE7He cntttcrl asl 1a,S possession OF the
goods hsfore thf right II nlaioftG aceruei, aud
that the tCor1c1@s t~.c~'nc= operative AZ 70 the
a1tit,6ata u the II Acs, AZ a1Anst ria utin
on tiir assumption ut Possession Of TAG Kvods ~
&tetctJ1ut bcfuFe th- 1sce-<ltnEs tn bankruptcy
In this case It vaa ltsn c1: tn1t1e0 by plaintiff
That II itt erilea:: N ret ttat Pat Operated
With Cfsne n ehoh!e httl ~ Dht1sn possesslon NJ
cucr over 1lt1rF crc+.tttr. Then the wf.ulc trans
acfioh WAS fr1Hhu'ent and viii. On this paint.
aai csaEr gave Cianc -,ti,c III thcr ns additional
3hEa-taEcs cGeI lh~ hrIer cTet1!1OlY than he
Natlf1 have bal wittaa. -uch assistance And CO.
orrrali,n. teen the '":-ndaHt Fas entitled to a
from thr frtdcrcr 10 hsvs given Crane m afya7-
tag. witch he wru 4 mn an.f c7nht oot otherwise
hasr had aE7lus' TIE ntaer creditors IN the FORE
Sr.-:.h>r,1d,ns 7-c nam frtm7:,nn G, the
cn4-~ that rl7',ttH w,e r0: enttl u to tvruvgr,
the tuts remained cut had a! late huug syc not
agreed.
cAcsE on TRIAL
W!titsm =: ncnn-:s et al. t!ssnuett i DoTity),
k,t pht:a4Ie;rhs4. =. Lncsns Boomer. Acttou pi
as-unpsts- On trial ThI. 6ult Il bfnught TO re-
i,nIer eors.acs f,r Inc s-',:',ssens Of Bao:aets %
7uun,1Ey, for fh.-rBnu!actnre nf Iron tubes 10 he
used iothtconstrurstt,E II tie railroad hrize over
the Missouri River At nnahR. It's alleged that
manded ln the suit. Tae defence Set nH Il that
tlcfo was tle1aE tn IN: .acttscTy. 1un tieIect Of
Enrk3,anseip. To wnt-7 tie pla!nuHs answer.
acceptance Of the m -n.neey Rn.1 It's active use
The contract. AZ nrl;d 1alIv male, WIS for the
price OF about s2e. .ooa