, 1870-11-04
Jnited States District Court,
IL kAkkArrICE,
a. ':,,-s-CieeI0 Stevens, Of Peoria
Circuit Court.

The previous notice Rtsen from this court IL
{ th.nGrd AID ntx,,nec. Oa Moptisy ntxt Inc Ilrat
Williams. Ut IL ILL.,. frutn cAse l2l to lsl ttt1al
cali sui tkcIe III he no further nsst cai] Of the
Ou slui ailsr Moi,tIsy mex, ali common law
I5at:trs, witch no. mattcts Of course, N y he
takcn up At Jel.ckA' Building, Circuit Court
H.. H. ~ siaird thss jug. Rsgers " waaa Ut 10 THIS
cnrll unul the 14lh 1nsz This Is correct Jury
,f,ais wlA also &c cout!susl u the branch rooai,
i5rs Judge Wi:liams. ii the court iloase.
1HK TCNkE1 istCSC1lo. DISSOLVED.
IT, Gcart 1n1ss t.1xs9 y n1sf9ssa .S
tany '. The tity ct ais In which 5ud9e bvoln
rad grated al lrjun:;lun Restraining tne rrose-
luton Of ~usk ul,,n the Las4lIe street tunncl In
tuch ulauuer ss shsuld interfere vita Complain.
enra occupancy OF y y,aEI OF the thift story or
stles ha1soE Thu s ea. ;s ,,c %seup'ea Y a!s toe
.tse en- upon S'e ;se tsee s q e lie % I'LL Ts
having been WITHOUT psejudice. tie snotton 70 dl4-
solve was renrwe,i nE Last Saturday. Complain
sara soiiciser occupied natll late nour arsaln9
and tnr case cAine up a2atn on Monday. when
dual hestlnx WAS entered upon. The Court has
,",ned tam .i ar esi TN te Iii ILL., Te I'll VS. aismsscd,
ard the party rtluitn Il IL his remedy al law.
The ,leclrton was W follUwB:
al as.s. IT, Il lie S.ni1sa @ Asnuss,uf,ns compsa1
ss;iast ,aa Sihsm isi.ti1s
s,s 3bsS hs * =
:.ss sas s:s Z e
::ss}s. ,tse! sh1 81: sea .sss aus::'sa. i +:
sose Il .hs "a q II H.
4 81 Il Fl saa q s
% sa1s s's5 ,nd ws h. ben 1 ,f .ie on Sc
isn ..ti:a. tlst sk< It !. d.mniatd
IN tk k1HH1 1NAe
ss; h h. e. ss s. s ss es.ss
ss 7: Al as4 e s4:st
III. i n It ts| ss 9s ,, t. b tbs a
y. Hue e. sot1 az ,s:s esr ii /. proper for the court
Of cs@ls;n.lI Inc rryefy e1ses aaiy IT, it
i ths aidas IN qasstisa sSd L: ~: +, 4. ,eie.
fa ~ tsss .s:
hsssstf,. Ermu.n1 os dc u q slss ps4I Til. i
tei xhfsh nv T. ssTt.n .+nss 5s eaisa tHs
s. ;ss g : ill.,
~ xhiss s. P9seeiy : ssssss:s :: i!;si.s.ss @
T. ~ 10 s q e a Iii. d.
Il. T ssa4e se s.ssss sssG, l. T. f!s1
s Il 8 y iv ssae5sp g. not f. ia,~2 ;t9e
intrtrFeaev. md do not tlinE shis Till
It i sus slesss in the complaint that tue DIV 4
s"asi :.s ss = .: thc suaasl eet Sss:
nt.a y Law. n1 - f.. e. :: 'hs P;aaIaEs = 9Is
~ ,ss .,;S:; sg}|ss III ,'Ss. AZ s:;s:;
g
Il ss si
Il t ssh aa Il se ,s s9.t Il f s.
S o 1T: Fl sse aoif Il Se Rst .aa
:hsG 4; %s :sstsIss x!ish :Asil *s AZ !ses:
is.ss SS!xh : .&ss s:sSesa; Is IT.
a. asss.ey etE
q e. e. s q M e. @ tas :a:4a e. ss 4 81. .
II a;or, d.t3ases and thrse T. T. nSs Il. c1.nss
ns..nr it, sn e n Wse aa
s.sa se fssd sss t ss..t ;eS: Il
f 'af IF e :t o. y and .t 20
T. ss:jas ~ Ghsste iSs%I: r. .1!&sa;iy s9a;s
L sssd e e. .s
7iset under thc Hs'r Or III .otus wzf BY which
T. Et,;t Siii s:s'h %.teI tt!est r eas .ids: n
miss M ias IT, Il tns ssaT i 'a n. Tut = f. e
eTc Psa I st :ontnuous l tss
et II this, n.rtl4,d Of getting ter..s The, favts
IT, ssaasS 81 SS @ s? E sS
I'D 1T IT S - = "a ~ n 'ss st @
dste !idui,s; bns az ety i: Sai lnlisa t.
III :a il H. ;sty .in:t sharaetes q sonsT1eiia
eS.,a nS 81 e. ..s ss*: s:tt wfs =
n Esds ot thr st5e.tr At.ss stst thsy ssu.trosts
IT: 81 =: y
NJ, h = atwu thr whole Way. and fendeErd. rerhap
Sea i,eie Wny .; ese.ssnx e ihe r.xe4 Or se,.s.
on attcr H. ty way to1ur'Ehas new they psopose 70
ssSf II
..t ys.*s., san sail Hnasr then =, /. s.ss%s' d"
Ia WHICH, VII Leave IL .osaiax INK psssst1y esns.s y
ss'T; ;s ssss H. IT, s'ss tss :sa ss
te .s u. Z. Ss s e p Ps t. , Il Z
EaaitIs {. a'eisFe ~ ,h;s s.s + *.
~ es!ins H.: rsrsies Z. tasir rSnlrd5 It LAW,
III .hs5 6 ,s s sss
mt, ayxats fog III e.idsase sh.s wi.at j. Ri
ss:s fss:1 IL 4 st
AZ; N Z, III
~ :aa g., @ Z.
s5< IL i .Ss sssiss isass a. is
s s.v ~ s0'ss &! sss q esa .sa o IL
ea asl @ 5setop % ytsssn. l.n5'csa l!es
ssssss e HI IS sste sst a. asi &
IL IL T.: f., nG S,hs, e tR%i .aen, eas 1ss g
1t ,s s;':rs Emit, t. d" th other than by 'n'anes
~ 1hess I .neshtt ss,os ~hy .as. 1njaes.ou ought
+ s T. ud Il n:tea. sa 81 s a o.r e
t 1Iser Of eidzens 70 Irmnse th- ni'ans es
f. S'isSS, s;is est Z ss
le and s.nant. htwsen th.s Complainant, slssk.
or " f wef vhss ssi t. ~
f. ssa P n 81: :a ~
GS: s2:a y: city nay r. sorno.sd ie BE- nsSssra,
.r5 s n rs's H.. % ,s si.s.ss: saas
.sss. 1 d or az :ysa. ps' n d III L 'nsts1 ns
ha' isy pE,sssa s,en. DIN. Is;SP 3. 4
n!sTy ,hsa,a = sSsosfsasnss = thu. sseq'
,te ol .*!es. T msses an e atssuss Z { a.se ID
oa Ms1ea ssh' ous ,ss'" sh., Z tae % aos
ss. ,,sy a!thf l. essar ~ r. &
Ss. @ sSsd K & 6 :sei .es r. i { &
- i pS u : q
a. =. ~
luAic ptnhAhie hpt + .n,onE TIC Iess'estsss Ne@
fhIch iss - tles ii ti.b;. Is copsr d.
H. fS:s5,; nssssis3 81 II,
sae sss's g,,: IL ss+ s,:S .As .,
rs sftS, sras5ty tsf i. I'd io< .a:a IL
c, as hss ens shon ts!n sss1asntnf y ~
g = 1st4s sss sa t.9a ss E
these Ot enus.t thA injunction eantok r. fs1sloeI 10
more rugo.e 81 safsshy cosnpEAinS w detsnaa4s y
E % rn.s e g. e
An Of the tnnnttInp It yvns cf xrRn4.a for any ruek
et1ua tc%r. and eanpos he Its.. Tor such pusf.
IL t1rfhsc dtolvc the Injunction and dtstuas the b
sttm- When Judgment hail thus hetn rendered
ntBt solicitor Tor complainant sl1Ac VI taking III
was Pm. requesting The C"ufs 70 specify the pei
eeth. Of tho bond. Nj. Tnley, for the ctfy then C.
was attention. 70 the sact shs .bs t4se a.sston q
Ecrm. | eCpreu Ctntt, The Rrpcai *ault retain II
Toe Junction, the effect OF which, during the dell
cinus l scar, Wouli probably he 10 entail damn:
tu!io. Tie city TO the a:"1snt of At fshs! o.
neles solicitor for ccmT1atRs2t sue sestcd tts dam
,nkeu but Was reminded that, In tue present nspe
two | the case, the question was not OF IT. dauai
ll!o. bEt vi The rrtnltrg loss to the city. 1t was
lo4l." | MAUD that il thr APPEAL we're taken. the
Thcp | wuutd properly ht su1h ~ 10 cover probable
con. | agea
upoa CK*SGts AEth pKFE1fkn.
upon Js1nes cs4nglr '. David Nuran. Arrts
It q | uta1 Lett n Judge Booth CfanHte snea
ard before -ussice TO recover feea fot dts ser
Ut Is a. N attorney In xnd shout some prosecutor
not The dtteuc+s Are that Ctanate va
d; upk when the cases came on to ha heard
eeon1 ofnef attorneys had IN be employed 70 fepr
Elth tho defendant, and that CrAngaes counsel y
The sucu nAturo that Htran has alre adr been sue1
ser lcysctetl uncet thht adsce, tor
nsst | IN which suit danARts are tsad nj Ss,o0a
Ss1e eis Vas y % dunk, nos1 an, ss1s,st. aas
from the esId of tie eaSt ~ had strl'u, :hnt'eh
eacrip- kiEAing hiu down b5aasA So5ne a'H9!s+'ss
' lar testified to tts condition OF susnx'r .tou.
other q nit found for de2cuhaus, uadefsta'l ling,
cared. s.s1s d, thnt An ntHfnty who wontt Res I
Inry- lutil'g The pfndtne Il ,.use II xs1ca be
Of the retained, WnB not nj euLJsct 10: Tees
n and ! EuRxC1osCKk-
o :0ls EfIuE II. McCOFtt lex Ct al r Mary Hart
soon Bill to ttrrc,,+e rDNs1sAxe on The EpD1aw cs:
ter OF Section q, So, II east r. III.