The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1870-11-25
COURT PROCEEDINGS.


OF, since our last report
John H. O'Neil VS.. John A. Hopper and
others; trespass; removed to Cecil county,
on affidavit of defendants. Farnandis and
Fl. W. Archer for plaintiff, Stump and S.
Archer for defendants.
Samuel Ellinger VS.. Catherine Fresh ac-
ton on the case; tried by jury verdict
for plaintiff for $22O.40. s. Archer and Van
Bibber for plaintiff, Stump, Gilbert and
Young for defence.
Samuel Ellinger VS.. Daniel Bolton action
on the case; removed to Cecil county, on af-
fidavit of plaintiff. s. Archer and Van Bib
Der for plaintiff, Stump for defendant.
State, use County Commissioners, vs.. John
Hopkins and others debt; judgment on
terms for plaintiff. Lee and H. w. Archer
for plaintiff, Stump for defendants.
Geo. A. Carlisle VS.. Nathaniel Bradley
action on the case; tried by jury verdict
for plaintiff for $37. Stump for plaintiff,
Webster for defendant.
]. ]. Michael VS.. Jas. 7. Bradford action
oh 1hO Saoe oh, ny NibCi vi plallltil Couu-
sci. Gilbert for plaintiff, no appearance for
defendant.
Jesse Price, use of Rutledge, VS.. James A.
Amos; case; off STREET. for plaintiff, H.
w. Archer for defendant.
Board of School Commissioners vs.. Keziah
Street, and others; inquisition; off, by order
Of plaintiffs attorney. Young for plaintiff,
no appearance for defendant.
State VS.. Alfred W. Kimble; indictment
for illegally setting up boundary stet Rut-
ledge for State, Farnandis for defendant
State VS.. Isaac Shields; larceny stet-
Rutledge for State, no appearance for deten-
dant.
State VS.. Henry Hemore assault and bat
terry; stet Rutledge for State, no appear.
ance for defendant.
State VS.. E. w. Elliott; larceny; stet-
Rutledge for the State, no appearance for
defendant.
State VS.. Chas. White; larceny; stet. Rut-
ledge for State, no appearance for defendant
State vs. ]. Amos; bastardy; not guilty
confessed by the State. Rutledge for State,
Farnandis for defence.
State VS.. Anthony Glover and others; lar
ceny; removed to Cecil. Rutledge for State.
Lee and Rosan for defendants.
State VS.. Joseph Smith; larceny removed
TO Cecil. Rutledge for State, Lee and Ro-
san for defence.
State VS.. Charles F. Smith and others; lar
ceny; removed to Cecil. Rutledge for State
Lee and Rosan for defendants.
State VS.. Anthony Glover and Others lar
ceny removed to Cecil. Rutledge for the
State, Lee and Rosan for defendants.
George P. Cook VS.. Patrick Haviland :;
appeal entered agreed. Stump for appel
liant, s. Archer for appellee.
Joseph Elbthal VS.. Joseph NIackin; APP
peal; entered agreed. II. W. Archer for
appellant, Stump for appellee
Henry Vieshon VS.. Lauder & Co.. appeal :;
entered agreed. Lee for appellant, Stump
for appellee.
L. M. Jackson vs.. VIM. A. Cook appeal;
appeal dismissed with costs. S. Archer and
Van Bibber for appellant, Farnandis for APP
pellce.
VIM P. Taylor VS.. F. G. Baldwin; appeal !;
judgment reversed with costs. Stump for
appellant no appearance for appellee.
John Reddington VS.. Moultons executor ;
appeal referred to II. D. Farnandis. Far
nandis for appellant, Gilbert for appellee.
Barney McGonigall VS.. Israel Allen; APP
peal; referred to John L. Williams. Stump
for appellant, Farnandis for appellee
Asel Bolts VS.. Henry Bankey; appeal !;
judgment reversed. Hopkins for appellant,
no appearance for appellee.
A. Davis vs. Lewis Morris appeal; iudg-
ment for appellee, by agreement, for $75 and
costs Stump for appellant, Bryant for APP
pellee.
Elijah Rockhold VS.. Elijah Hawkins APP
peal entered off. Stump for appellant, no
appearance for appellee.
James o. Grafton VS.. Henry A. Ward APP
peal attachment quashed by CONSENT
Maynadier for appellant, Van Bibber for APP
pellee.
Joseph H. Everett VS.. d. X. Jones appeal
entered off. Young for appellant, Lee for
appellee.
James Scully VS.. Cole and Adams; case {;
judgment by default for plaintiff Hopkins
for plaintiff.
Yesterday being Thanksgiving Day, the
Court was not in session, it having adjourn
ed, on Wednesday afternoon, until this
morning.
... RAILROADS.
We were pleased to note that the letter of
our correspondent ar. r." was laid before
the people of Baltimore county last week,
through the columns of THE Union, which