The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-04-29
49,, v,rsr,,nd should say when her husband got
r. 4 -Not that AIN aware OF.
uopsg THAN eREELEY's MEMORY.

NJ. vcFsrland should say when her husband got
IT, A-Not that AIN aware Of
WORSE THAN eREELEY's MEMORY.
ono ,s the b. syy ss v ws mot
you . p Sst%SSn McFatSnd and III. wife A.
s,hbnE Ms Mcfarland asked me 10 be present at the
hosNpc not you all 20 in to hear what might be said
l.nIdat IoT go there to hear what was said7 A
nc iamc purpose? Aye, sr lsnpp9se they did:
S VAST Dot al arranged during me day what Mrs
oorH"waon aid YOU first Know he was to come there1
AL thinN It was Friday or Saturday.
THE HEIGHT OF siScLAIR's AGoNr.
o,ou knew that meeting between Mrs. and Mr.
Me- arland was to take place at your houser Al
'n1N WHO told You Of the Intended interview Al
,h1nk they both told me aboutlt
Q-Had you seen Richardson that dayp Al don't
Man you sccqbim since Mrs Mcfarland left Amny
'QtlHHoW long had you known Riehsrdson2 Al
tncw him partially rs long ago a. the Kansas troubles
aScLuRs FEARFUL MEMORY.
opo Won remember when Mrs. Me- arIand spoke
toMr Mctarlani OF her detcrmnationt TO leave him.
he cIhnited great grief and you walked up TO hun and
sh"ui don I remember.
c ss ae hat Eg You SH d not s say
"Bcar II ne man. Mac, Am your friend'" A.
NC-S Vii yeS say now, If his wife in the rich, and
ia ie len TS sy sU S %Sre Of ~ ht ,T0nd any
C-N3' no! There was right and thci was wrong
wo s, IA Se Wa, SSor nfs Soas 5 'eS
Cq rarity 10 ,s TsGt q, and partly u r. wGn
S-6Sat Sou didn't say spyihlas, TO Mrs. Mcfarland
about being her friend. did youp Al don't know
'QI-i on addressed MIN Familiarity, Ne "Mae2" A.
srNcLAiR's AGONY INCREASING.
Q-Did you hear Mr.. Johnson say to Mcfarland.
.b"ai tnse man ma. he was his friend stiil9 A
ebc you undertake e iell ,hi. jury that, ,ro@ any
E III sH%l0hSa 81 ss
OF my recollection s Mr.. johnson aud lis wife had an
S.i&ssS i ana ' S, "a gsi after the
o-wli you under axe from an, tling that occurred
2n 9nd ME TC 'n;iHI,s 3D. ts soST,g Q! Mrs MSfST
ion ABOUT the matter.
now SINCLAIR DopGgD.
Q.-will you say here that Mrs. Mcfarland's father
didn't sppfcach Mctarand and urge him to hear mp
ePi ri iSsy W. s5 u a@% s% was us 'N''
& ssff S s% he rf a. snd 'S . 1e
before didn't he manifest great interest in Mr.. McFar.
anu Tom ala he 80 .y@Sass w
MS s s hat he Ss2 % TO n out oS s5S 's
bm oil night
DIFFERENCE DErwEEs MEN.
~, van saw Sy wife conduct that .he ' was re
od Leave hin nS he was - no, in Fssst
A. men generally would under such rcdms,ances;
there rad ference between meni he showed a great
'eOaow long did the interview i.tp Al should
"eNbidnt be tell her he did no, go there with view
ior per returning 10 himp Al didn't hear anything
nSgi because he wanted I 70 ofsSttsn that Sss
9 wsn 70 SGuse s ANN he SAID he
Swss 4 not because he said he wanted to heal the
o According to the best OF your recollection didn't
that man expect to get back his wife that night? A.
WHAT SINCLAIR SUPPOSED.
Qwhat was he distressed about. II he went there to
tonsett TO teparationr Al suppose he was IN
rHE FREE-LovER's AGONY AGAIN.
o-Then YOU think when he commenced that hour. he
was doubt 70 whether he would get his wife oack
Be GpdsIsS%d as swing tina, he was perfectly recon.
BAT ys Your question. o0n' know
o-D9 you wait ms Jury 70 understand that during
deere &c, NJ. wife back ain and Al ihe conclusion
y mnuI could be Induced to resign The woman he
time he sd said he saw whs' r ss
eve scm. II va, irIeyOeable. Richardson had
made SO but what ! want 70 kpows this II he
xSed secure reorganization. or md his relation
s S 10 6 & you say ssn he
FREE-LovE IDEA or H'TARLAsDs MIND.
Q.-Then you believe this interviev. which com.
nenssS WIN no S'snnSn on ~, psrs % rSt,srng The
nation 10 a complete separation DO you mean to tel
s 1ry hst such y0Hr SPinSn Al 70 tel
mo. thai 6 forced S IS ron n lin rO
,e..,wnl YOU say he was sincere? Ale said whA
800 believe ae mean. " Al hlnk so;
y0I sys. ,ola Mn ndfaTlHnG you 9elleyec
eopyeTsa,ion with aer on that particular subject.
since that Interview? AYES, SIR
INTENSITY OF sINcLIR's AGONY.
91pd Won ever tell EleaSrd'on you regarded tn
G"Yoa Gp w. donf YOU hat legally man ana wiz
canlot make IN agreeuent In this way to separate
even. but do YOU think they en- do SO morally
that man and woman who have been legally Marie
taat your STANDARD OF morals2 Al think they ca
y And conf romise innocent parties-their ofrsprio
aS 1 9IT Ssa nat A IN 's aS aGrI IN
bat h SSn e an h ad whsS ths 1S .s
i've "S :s rsn What w9Ta y3q as I to m
3"1sS you link Mcfarland in tina. lntcryiewurge
her to think ofhes and chldren-of her affection IL
her Children and her regard for him' A-Yes' sir.
sIxcLAns LETTER TO SALMON r. CHASE.
elm the month Of March 1851. when you saw Nj
Cd 10 witaSss A-Ses gave HIN tnat letter nan
Q--Is that letter truep DO you want TO unaay an
port on OF that letter before the Court and Jury
you do unsay IL tel " what Il ~ A.-Well, SIR d
you want me 10 say whether would write letter la
that now?
Ono, no; know YOU would not. fLaughter.l Yo
eont LOOK as though you wonld tRenewe1 laughter
want to know whether you wish to unsly anythn
that IL included In that letter. A-No.
Mr., CT ahan-1his letters written 10 the Hon salmo
p Chase, the Chief Justice OF the United States, and
o. follows:
9th Marcn, 1851
sm: Mir. DanI Mcfarland. OF this city. desires n
appointment ~ Register IN BANKRUPTCY In TINS cit
Mr.. McFarlAnd is one OF tho lew
RADICAL ASTI-sLAyERY FRESHMEN
lgrea laughterl and u worthy man. and well qualire
y oil the position Of Register. hope you viii feel
proper 10 appoint him. -
Very respectfully, SAMUEL SINCLAIR
PILISG Up sIScLAIRs AGONY,
Q-Ths rss II ore than two weeks after this sunda
hiIit lu'rryrwY Ayes judging from the date
Q-lIt date IT, the same as that 81 the interccItc
hUer. Sow, We CONS to the interview IN March, l>6
Wien you t0uh Tim to tax for being instrumental
ieI'f irntLg his mother when she went - sec hin
}oy go ~ be eve i wrougin father who thlnd
u. F'' .lh ~. crlid nm thout cause and has ~
I'n ,.4' -'lt 10 her paramount to discount enauc
hl'N mart to his child, II he has the custody
we '..t. ufltu consider that wr0ug2 Al didu
en'H,i Ice hhd parnm lur that was why -
~ .ILi -tuu-I-Suppose he was The Judte-'l
iAt"l VS. H. l4-2t you were not the father was IA
ll4L'i ehu' ~ The father jrdged sne mad made q
~ i surrender Of herr vlt 10 her pAralUuur, d