, 1870-01-03
DIVORCE II HEW YORK.
LnH nnd DecencJ Sci ut Defiance
Divorces Secured ut Short Notice
How Evidence IL Manufactured
by FfoIesslonnl Pefiurerss

York snould be the last place IN which person
sou'd apply !cr. disosce on trivial grounds Of
sP .s al s7d me !nsTs ss Is which essa ssse
IN this city the divorce huttness has not
attained foo,hoid here. Tnls imore.s!oa
a'srStd 1e1a WesPesn fray ~ stauea: ahsGe sins
are esio TO stop nfteen minutes for divorces are
equa,ed. II 70. Surpassed. in this respect tn New
covers ne = stilniiy can here be cut bose IRON
matrimonial partner 10 the most expedluoaa man-
ner. II Is no; Lece saary TOT ne appAcaM ioE d.
liciy proet cutirR his case, nor for him to even
await The ns1aIy ) tardJ process Of the courts ia
such caseA. Indeed, the applicant nerd nor sppeH
It ii and % 6as the money no. 70 psy Inc lees demanded,
be ray simply state his wishes 10 The proc1rer,
who viii himee1f mske out COMPLAINT, macufsc-
psn .hs &c e
divorce In an Incredibly short period
There 10 probably no more comp:e.e system OF
ifnud AID outrage n existence IN IMAM some Of me
to Dc tLfetred that every law,er who ls partcu-
laIiy successful In proeuflrG divorces ia Euare,
tae1 m proceed il sncS csses, and DO nor ,ske tnsn
without good evidence Of tue tluthfuluesa OF the
complaint made BY the applicant. But tlere Is q
eaIsS q
ot pFoft ssouA peT1aIerb to manufacture evldsuce
npd Who viii get decree Of divorce for any per.
ace ouf, but judicial elgnaf1res ara forged, aud.
IL nlLe cates cut Of ten, the credoious applicant
receives for his money decree Of divorce
Which ~il not stsnd moment Nnen disputed "
regular legal pfoeeeoioet 5eA1ce!y osy pssses
Mltnott me pnoHcation o. tuLs sestl0R ahine euca
fraudulent divorces ohtHtned hy manufactured
amaafns, a. 1ne uslenaans ent HeasSanS suomtS ~
aEd dnlet!y Piocoles alyolce, aEso IN
pteieteuee 70 naA,IE nSu.; acs7 taynet Tn " .no
G ut - ~. ae ~ n,s
SUN Of money. ard does not trouo hlnselt aoont
seosequest @ M couhter psoeeeaoHs uniess taeIe %
CnAtH: ~. anone. aee. .nstn uS ". ~ -.
pkatoG ~ raasies EEL, - s ~ .
a.noh' T. ~. ,p ps ~, 'nu ,,,,
MEL, ,aIine ISe TecIee a., as'Hs Gshenr
me me sa;1soh 81; o1 pon'saoe LEE pefpeaa'ssa OF
TsaIa Il e. "a c,sez of ann,,can,a h,qarer rho
o,e s1xnys - iuI,shed ~ sae proeurrT r,,s ~"
gaLu h itri%v iosetSsr ann % M
s,tinn y, s,rh al ~ IsnEa II car.a,n ,snr
ne detensIsnt xGuid contest diSorcs Iiresea mn
Nd1,ss Snch %st+es II ,fytnc IN Ha VIZ -
psIelaliy ,tsSi upon having q d.yorce iq conlor.
nlts with 1he laSs ot 'he STATE, aod are Wiling
=. TX ~, ~ ~ IN ~ rS.a ~ az AN
nsrSoc1 msnna1 trwo ,insi ra'tona eli, snf,ies -
snow ,he exc. nature oi tnis clas.. and the
.;si ,Nn1t ~ NV f'oe0As' :" oo'0'1ns
Et,tt ~ trc tn7hsed uho "a conrtnraa or hJa
cIiTinstitv m her mart am anni;ss ~ ths m.
o ~ s - " Ye pH12 @ H1~ ~ NJ ~ . Suu pu.
a.,eIie ~ retecttrss Ehn are ~ eiaavs tsr, - n.nd
ior such casss, to watca the suspected w,fe, and.
.:,,, n ~ ~ n.',oS. e. saas, a I4s1 sne
suts P,t nu g.. n,it EN- u. auN
ctrtirg fbe detectives are prepared 10 sweAr that
~ " W aes pait, noa
,sln1',e Inan;ran nnsiv an,.sGs ~ ,n,it ~
possible 10 disprove Id court. There is no DOUBT
may eases nase TneIe sn !ea,oos ~ nas "
oana naa neSa Gpon .ue G3avict,oa o. ais
I a psspsains tas Outrage y upon bo9
Next il lie vile VINO desires divorce, but has
60 uounos Of suspicion that her husband Is un.
faithful She may be IN love With auother lnan,
ine c1dluaI5 troubles Of the married state, she
communicates with o!vorce p1ocurer, aud il pre-
pared 10 pay handsomely !s assured ihat the d.
hsrd msy Ike perfectly upright IN ns CONDUCT, aud
~ respectable ia all nis ussocations mat no sls.
aa az =
rrccurer ] @ sends 1 fascinating % woGan to W entrap
HIM. She Ii oeauu1u. aceoDpus led. anl
ne yy,a1a ,e5 gsrason Of
Le.H- aLd soUner or later involves tue msn in a
tram OF circumstances which enable tue proco.et
m o
o bsseness sol oi naisiind u III ID WA. NV ''sN N'''' '1'
ues axse e. sss as es ee
vofces thus Obtained cannIt be sci aside. Fortu.
uateiy they are comparatively few in number, but
cat cs and involves complete system OF perjury
and forgery from beginning 10 end To illustrate:
Mis- John Smith, residing In New YORK, writes
to the divorce ptocuzer that her nnsbant has ILL.,
treated her, that she suspects him Of adultery,
md that she vacls a divorce. The psocuser r.
pss as. as eea of
another amoun1 upon the divorce be!rg obtained,
lei wishts shall be e1anned. Next iEau brings
the complaint to the procnIer, who calls IN hls
nrnfaS NtonA} F,pe1utaFa md AcHQafnfA them with
the contcnts Of tine compliant H. however, 1t Il
| Lot atIonR eLpuuh The procuter makes out
tnconlng ine Lew complaint IN document aienel
With nogus name as plsintin's attorney sends u
70 the rete1ee appointed BY the court 70 take tcs
| the de1eEdaIt shall he tummoned 10 appear: aud
10 get over this dllculy the procurer 1fs out the
'sS:'ps SSEg: pse: fern OF atda7' and attaches
bel, s dug e".rp. says tua. OF ,ne-day OF
!spoutn s.tyea he 4nsa1ed summons On
| ca1ing -i'n Fa,u defendant, -, pereonaiiy, {
true copy Of said annexed summoaB, n.-. II
the CITY cf-- depoaeur Z: :owinG the perdcI
he the ce eteldans IN tE.s ACTON.
| Sworn 10 eefore me, th!s day OF"
rel,rr.d t. and WHICH, Of coutse, is never serEe,
! upon The defendant:
| -, ptaintln. against -, defendant
| Summons for Eellet.
Tp---:
You are hereby aupmoued anc required to IN
| n!cJ 10 thr oilice Of the CLERK OF The Supe',o
CO! IT Of the CITY Of New York, at the CitT Ha!
| New York: and 10 eerye cops OF your ansHe
10 said Complaint on 1ne subscriber, At his ONCE
within twenty days after the Aerv
irr Of this hrut. 0ns On sou, exclusive ol the Ia
Of service: sLo II you fa1t 10 apsTef u tue satt
co.pnlait within the time arcrc nit the p'alut
de@snoed IN the complaint ,,----o
|
tocrs e sn,s casr ann me nraiir1ir
a1y documents thus Manufactured having bee