The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-04-06
BY striking INTO the following vein Of inauistion;

by striking INTO the following vein of inqusition:
Mr.. sPgScHE-po any persons with whom you are
associated attend NE church Of Dr. rockingham or
Q-Do you KNOW any or these gentlemen except from
Z ~iSyc YOU 81 any such resrect for either or both
OF these individuals would IN ANY manner aneet your
Gaze. performed oy themp
THE CoURT-I cannot permit that question.
Mr. GRAHAh-lf your Honor please, II is The place Of
the prosecu ION 70 make an objection. - ~, -,
and prepSety co@peis me % exclude The cushion 11
MI GRAnAMIBeioIe the court can ~ eye an oolec-
We expect, durng the progress Of ths case to show
CONSPIRACY HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE
nom the very to crnsh and destroy this man
There is no adequate language which can use with
,aca 20 S Iev viii not &c efeeneG as
&c we az m W. are o0gaa y ST1s hs an SnI
mad ior pe,oa OF two yeas aid nine noHtbs il has
P2. es om the e hat "t t %omaa calsee. az
seondlng from hex husband Gown ~ tue preseas tine
rLEARRANGFD CONSPIRACY,
and we propose prove IL; and this conspiracy has
been fosterei ny those VINO ought 10 he ashamed 70
resDeei4Ge people beiors tn.S com,haa,H. Are W.
upon 70 DOW before
SUCH IMAGES AS BEECHER AND FRoTHISGHAH
aud whoever else in this prosecution,
setup2 Are We not onuucd 10 ferret i all out2 We
that the 9owu.all OF that man was aTranfed rom TIC
emy pratsncc to endorse IT, do so TO the fullest extent
SO shtl show thnt this woman had no eau o 70 leave
tins mad % can to dare them 10 prove single
cause. Wewl oompel them to 60 into the Issues o.
placed before this community, II Nil anphll them We
| are enltied now 20 ask our Jurors whether ther,
70 sustain tn. ir?dty before whico !ei respect jr
| them cOmppls the 10 % perform gtnuheNon, submit
II Is time enough che prosecution 10 hyu rs Ia Win
oUlectlun- an lrJe,t against Tue Court volunteer.
ing an objection against us. como OF u nave spent
| weeks IN tae invest CATION OF this case and We have
come here not {, Vt dl W and heaf everything We &c
'" Ts q ''f be wrong, NIr Graham bat can
| not oyeruOk what COns'uer NJ uut}'
| Mr.. HUBBARD WIS challenged lerempiorily by tn
| prosecution, .
| Solomon v. Wilson was the next Noticeable juro
| called. MI Wilson's strong point Was that lac Ia!
scrupes against the death penAly until the outl al
| OF the atn war, but the rebelion had cured MIA
| that Weukness, and now
| NE WENT IN FOR HANGING.
| NJ, Wilson'S opinion was strongly made up \
| this else, and so he was SGT aside. Nalcot d. 4
next o,jeCt interest lie had mother and sisters
aud was impartial Ia bis feelings. AZ the lime Q
the homicide his synpathes were with the prisoner
hut now I've absolutely without BIAS and coul
try the case fairly. Mr.. Graham said he would tax
that Young man ag juror-that, In fact, he though
any young man " ith a mother and sisters would y
| a safe juror for the prisoner. Tho prosecute
challenged Mr.. Il~nsend for principal and TO 81
| favor, but not be ing sustained, Judge Garyin cha
lenged lin psren lptorily This leaves the proSac'
| tion but TWO NOR peremptory challenges.
| Morris Leon, Jew, clothier, and marie
| man, with no cl adren, ana hard visaged pei soI
| who passed q ood examination and seemed q nit
| willing 10 sit As juror, was haally challeng Pc
] emptorily By MI, Gerry, and Yves set aside. Abr