, 1870-12-16

and thea, - she opened tbs doo1. the renaEt eay
msde ~ 70 her Emartoesh He bad been applied
T. e sae e g. sPSp @ i 81 Sp g sud aa.
cer1atned i wa hoose tnat had bean talked
seout; It had bad reputation; It Was called
houee Of xsz1<nttton, Or de4a hppke, Where theT
had roo1na fusnisaed for Pefsons VINO Desired to
CTusssxamsad.son.- an not broker, bot went
to lend some money. Iwss married Il The ur.e.
aud an now,
JOHN STARING,
esY s'1es is M os IT, eiessnx Il as ses Easd u M
Statea Express Company, under The father at de-
fendant, but had no Acquaintance With Mr.
yeaT, nsSink mot her ia ! aleish ss sas came %
The oulce win Charles Wilson. drter. ae hAd
seen her. OF and On, good many times ance
Wien @ be bosrdtd I tnste, u did d T Golsin .ad s IL
Beardslee family. He never saw au!thing be-
tween ttem. except feeing Mrs. Besrdslee and
% mesnlnT: n ia IL de % anaa % dnns room It Il aS5us Il
O'clock. Ae aaw Beardaiee t1 The large dining
1oon frequently, at about O'Clock, with bis ch1l-
d1en.
and mas rea.dcd tn Chicago four yea1s aud haiti
ses a o E H. = e. nd I'd
knew where MIR Morrison Hired On West RAn~
aolpI. street. md once went there IN company with
a ss u e. shs NJ So
vent ihele Viii james L RocG 1ddie as Morrison 800
seS Me- Sorson u ~ Notice. aalpx SsS sSe
pa1tes, q whom witnesh saew only Mn. Boards:
a0 b, ~sai Which p,me as e. ~ as1 ipol 9.
duced 10 the WitnetA She VAS not introduced to
ene other time. Then witness went to the house,
spd Mr.. Morrison introduced her AZ 'Malle,h
That Has the same woman witness skW wheu aho
weut to the house With Reck- She could not
was there, because she did not ioof 1t hin.
Cross -e7amtnettoss- She Kept house where she
nSg Ies'sed s9e arst made The aesga!af,nss
With her hushand She went to eec the house
about futnIku1s ahe WIS 70 buy. Hex husband WA
candy maker: After going Win Rock sne went
duced TO the wnman "Molle,r aud would know
her now Il abe saw her. Alter stating It Vss
Mnllie Mrs. Morrison raid thar ~ Ars. BeAfdalec
Of No. 1e. West Randolph street, keeper OF boot
and 6hte store, had mad such store about i've
shosn IL sep a.
nothing ennce,n mtg the tenants up stairs In 1862
Mrr. Morrison occusted the upper premises rs
had feeu great mAuJ men and women 20 into
tce house, hut great many people hved In the
bouse.
ukLRN FARpkE.
roJ esiIea ~ eoa1sei %is u Moatan q I'D a ane
uee n an attachment during the morning.
70 the plaintiff 's attorney. that aae was sick, or
had recently beeu 80. wherefore she deslEed to
cnnsuit Dr. NoodhuET.
| lowed 10 20 to tie Doctors once. Counsel for
the tlAiniin {Bexrdslrt} deci'ned 10 rrlease her
from ,hs attae9meot, nn'ess sae would be at q
sralis ttat they had hsd considerable dIsncnltJ
in nndlng her. Af'tt she was suppGnaed sqe hail
left the piRce where she had resided, and avoided
/ 1f1A af7rd In her
vas not desired that he vitoea should Be kepl
6e avais6!e for he purposes oi Tie it1a'.
Thr Ctutt stated that counsel could s1amiot
l her Al once whereup1n counsel stated taas thel
order, and did not wish to examine ber then, hu
| would not content that she 8hontd be rele1 Ied
from the attachment They had had already
| eEouGh u0uhle fb nnd9ng her.
On tie question Of the attachment. the wines
aaid that sne had heen snbpnnaed a. Minnie Fur
III vas Iett to Re detertn,ned who should pay ta,
expenses Of the atiachmont, and she was atlos
to d. part, ut on condition that ehe wuuld Fenhlt
Tnts 1i,ness was aeut for early Ia the afternoon
ard ca1re into court after the Judge had states
thst he w1nM not wait upon witbssses, and that
II the plaintiff had rot his wttntfkes IN court, HI
must TEST hla case. She stated that her name VA
IItkn Fsrlee, living on Wtst Madison stVpes
nss ss vs si q s1 foI % E.
/ hut not IN 1863 She sewed 1t No. Is
| West Randolph street In 1s6s for d Afg. John
ron. vino occupied the whole Of the third nool
/ Mr1. johnson bad no family, hut occnpted thre
/ or four fooms, psrlor, room used for sitting
md she cou1d moi tell what other rooms. BetTee
the roorna we're dark rooEnA. During the time u
wss employed there, MrA johnson went 70 g
! IAuIR and witness Ea4 left tn charge OF tn
houBe- Mr. JohL son Ea3 atferHArd known
the name OF Craig. She might before that tim
| have been called Morrison. And she believed sh
wx1. Mrx Morrison rented two Of her rooms Q
her door for sleefipg roonE. She coud not 81
ope. ME- Morrison had that While NfA MoEEtso
| tss absenr. witness occupied her room. and s1
| did not know my one who occupied It during Il
| da1 time. She bad seen Mr. Beard&lets but pi
| the dt 3eniaur, John COly1u. nnd nGrer SaF him
Stt knows Of. She did not not know that 81
ever raw MIS- Besrdxlee, Il she Wa before wttnes
Witness could not 6wear II sue was As9- Beard
!! ! known az ReArdslee or Aollt. She might ha'
seen Mr. Beafdslee and not knew her. Hltnt
never called her hy that name. BeAr1slee call,
On her once. Whist she stated, and who v
) | present Oh the OCCASION, ruled opt1 Witness Y
FubE9u2Ed Jefteluty. ffhe coaIt declined
allow her to STATE 1t she 1Aid she did not ten
. cr1cer the would not come, snd, II she did.
Ctnss-ezaminatfon: She knew RccE, and b
| eetn him &t that house. he was there II !et
. THREE OF fnur times She Raw Rock and BeAEtaAl
!. | Abput inst Gaze. They wanted continuance
! lure md October Rock 1rat spoke to her ano
= witness tu that case IN Juue.
: On decentralization. She VRs not allowed
3 tay If the defendant or his attorneys had spoE
! to her shoutIt II
The examination OF witnesses Will be coutinu
| fC.kjAy.