New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-05-24
THE COUNTS.
Supreme Court Deci.ions

|
from the Second District Court of New Or
leans.
David Conners for the use of Angus
Koenlg VS.. Citizens Mutual Insurance Com
pany-George w. Avery, appellant. Appea
from the Fourth District Court Of New Or
leans.
Johp s Seely, appellee, VS.. O. 7. Blanch
ard. appellant. Appeal from the Dlstric
Court of LafOurche.
Thomas ]. Burke, appellant. vs. Louis
Tregre-Third opposition and Injunction o
Alphonse Mitenberger, appellee. Appea
| from the District Court OF st. John the
Baptist.
John B. Slawson VS.. John Meggit and
Catherine Gibson, his wife. Appeal from
| the Seventh District Court Of New Orleans.
| L, A. Barrow ct ais, appellants vs. heirs
Of A. Bird, .appellees; Appeal from the
District Court of East Baton Rouge.
Cass & Bowling, appellees. vs. 1. S.
Ruark, appellant. Appeal from the Sixth
District Court of New Orleans.
Liquidation of Clinton and Port Hudson
Railroad Company. appellants, VS.. Samuel
Lee, appellant-Appeal from the District
Cour. OF East Feliciana.
State of Louisiana, for the use of city of
New Orleans, appellant, VS.. Philip Dopf d
J. B. Nick-Appeal from the Fifth District Of
New Orleans.
Amaron LedouX VS.. Ovide Lejuine-Ap-
peal from the District Court of Pointe
COupee.
Victor Burton vs.. Albert D. Cage-Appeal
from the District Court OF Terrebonne.
In the following case a rehearing was
granted, to wit:
P. 0. Pazende VS.. William W. Flood-Ap-
peal from the District Court Of Jefftrson.
The following cases were decided:
Schmidt & Zeigler vs.. First National Bank
of Selma Apnral from Seventh District
Court Of New Orleans. Ordered that the
judgment of the District Court be reversed,
and that there be judgment in favor of de-
fendant and opponent, and that he, in his
capacity OF receiver Of the First National
Bank of Selma, be put in possession and
control Of all the assets of the Selma Bank
in the Louisiana National Bank of New Or
leans and which constitute the subject mat
ter Of this controversy, plaintiff ana appellee
to paw costs.
j. W. Zacherie vs. R. Sproule u Co.-Ap-
peal from the Fifth District Court of New
Orleans. Judgment affirmed.
Succession of L. D. Day-Opposition of
universal legatee to executors account
Appeal from the Parish Court of East Baton
Rouge. Judgment affirmed.
G. Salvatore vs. Crescent Mutual IN
surance Company ct al.-Appeal from the
Sixth District Court of New Orleans-On a
rehearing. Ordered, that so much Of the
former decree as renands this cause to the
lower court be set asine and that in other
respects il remain undisturbed. Mr.. Justice
Howe recused.
F. Boisdore VS.. George and Robert NAL
colm-Appeal from the Second District
Court of New Orleans. Judgment affirmed.
Joseph Aleix Va. Charles Derbigny, widow
Dutfel, tutrix, intervenor-Appeal from the
Sixth District Court of New Orleans. Ap-
peal dismissed, without prejudice to the
rights of the intervenOr.
J. Barnett, wife ct al. VS.. P. Bernstein ct
al.-Appeal from the Second District Court
of New Orleans. Judgment affirmed.
A. Rochereau vs. E. Dupasseur-Appeal
from the Sixth District Court OF New Or
leans. Judgment affirmed.
E5couOas Lowell. appellants. vs. Loui4i-
ana Petroleum and Coal Oil Company, ap-
peles. Appeal from the Fourth District
Court of New Orleans. Howe, J.-Ordered
that the judgment appealed from be avoided
and reversed, and that plaintiffs have judg-
ment as prayed for, for the possession OF
the lands described in their petition; that
writ of possession issue in due time therefor,
and that the defendants pay the costs of
both courts.
Widow Charles A. Slack ct al, appellants,
VS.. Edward J. Gay, appellee. Appeal from
the District Court of Iberville. Ludeling,
c. J. Judgment of the District Court AVOID.
ed and reversed, and that there be judgment
in favor of plaintiffs, against defendant for
six hundred and fifty dollars, with five per
cent interest, from Judicial demand, and
costs N both courts. Further ordered that
E. j. Gay have judgment against Mrs. Eliza
Keep, his yender and Tarranter, for the like
sum, interest and costs. and that the demand
)f Mrs. Keep against. Henry S. Slack, admin
strator and individually, be rejected, with
costs.
A. Levi & Co., vs. Wolf Silverstine. |
Appeal from the Fourth District Court of |
New Orleans. Lude.ing c. J. Judgment !
affirmed. !
j. N. Bowditch, appellant, VS.. George |
aeaton, manage, etc, etc, appellee. Appeal
cans. Ludeling c. j. Judgment affirmed, |
With costs of appeal.
Summers q Brannins VS.. J. B. & Francis |
7. Hollingsworth. Appeal from the District |
court of Tensas. Ludeling G. J. Judg- |
nent affirmed, with costs of appeal.
4. Il. DeMeZa VS.. L. F. GeDeres, Elmore |
)afour. Appeal from the Seventh District |
Jourt of New Orleans. HoweJ. Judgment |!
.tfirmed.
Volney E. Ogle and James G. Leach, ex-
cutors, VS.. ?. C. & Prosper King and Oscar
[lbbe ct al. Appeal from the District Court
4 fTensas-HoWe J.-Ordered that the judg-
nent, so far as il accords TO the interven
RS mortgage subsequent in rank to that
# plaintiffs, be avoided; that the inter.
'enors' mortgage be decreed to be prior in
ank to that of plaintiffs upon the property
described in the act by which their notes
re secured; that in all other respects the
aid Judgment remain undisturbed, and that
he plaintiffs pay the costs of appeal.
Fifth District Court.
Lalurie VS.. Southern Bank.-In this case
- L,,I l.. - L
e offered to pay and was told that it was
OF there. The note was afterward found
nd protested. Plaintiff brought suit for
20. 600 damages done to his credit by the
rotest. The case was tried yesterday be.
1re a jury, who brought in a verdict in
svor of plaintiff for $500.
W. Fl. Harmon VS.. Henry McGwinn, ap-
cal from the Seventh District Court of par
n of Orleans. Judgment affirmed with
oct OF appeal. Ludeling, c..
Richard johnson vs. John Ii. Gennison.
ppeal from the Sixth District Court of the
arsh of Orleans. Judgment affirmed with
Osts Of appeal. Ludeiing, G. j.
Edmond NJ. lvens VS.. Richard Johnson.
ppeal from the Sixth District Court parish | ;
Orleans. Judgment of the lower court |
drmed with $50 damages and costs Of ap-
cal. Ludeing, c. j.
Mary w. Henderson VS.. 7. L. Maxwell, | {
1eflH ct al. appeal from the SLXtn DIS
let Court parish of Orleans. Judgment af-
rmed with costs of appeal. Ludellng, G. J.
II. PATHS vs. William NJ. Strickland ct ais,
Tiillam ri. Strick land VS.. Hyatt Gillespie
ais. Appeals from the Third District
ourt, parish of Orleans. Judgment affirmed
ith costs of appeal. Luieling, C. j.
James Flint VS.. New Orleans Canal and t
auking Company-Appeal from the Fourth
istrict Court Of the parish of Orleans. {
ppeal dismissed at the cost of appellant.
udeliug, C. j. &