The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1870-09-03

betrothal II IA something snowtug That the ipdi-
~ .s , .sa "s ~ ~ - acaly
IN rue sss's sag s ana Inc w"ras duty o.
Inc III The indybInai worls9 Thsv aon,s ,nsar
eI,ino m nah,aIcn or rn,,a aa sacsarraa a.. ILL
Nnw YORK HEnaIn bv Mr. newman Fodr - n sue
sa.ses ara Gnaiad MIN, aud ~" h r
e~.n maj n1"'e ,u,r r tha' rasSaoas na Ne
the wn,'i doos mar ona,r in o,,ha. or In nna
place n A. n WORD iransaten in nenteronomv as "a
.refuye y and IA the Iozrh Psalm n H. transat.sl
.len = and m Iercm,sh " s transiaiaa tio"
ana in Amos it Is translated by a word that repre-
sens The same thing Rnt The original worI occnrs
once IN tSa hia 30 ~" nan nra,sn 10 nc 5000
that was published by Mr. 81 bs A. NJ Professor of
sacred Iiteralure n, the fnea,glcaI insttntJon of
snhec and no viii ,e re "o VIVA. INC sass s % I'M, us
lexicon, That the ssjuty or mairiaoen means
cohahitat,on. her roonv anI ra,,a"ss e onn the
duty of cohahItatian ba on ~ not I,,ci,iaS
What An Unmarried woman q ha,rniH "a wnmana
God Command an mn,sneh ana,a,,"o VAN
one not ,"nrredy msn n concentration f Wa
marreG and we nave the %as NV My
taken is acknowledged as the true wife Here
then we have the true vile and ma lord M o,va
There are many other passages that wou,d be
Glad 10 refer io w0uld lime nersnt az me- atate
have a moments time left. Refer 70 Hosea want
ali OF Won when Won 90 homa TN rood rho se"nnT
chapter III Hoses and Won viii Ana %at nofeag az
Hosea having divorced his arsl vile of whnre1ons
before tax ne The anIteresa maj InS a. ~ M n
thing recorded in tne cnsnter rnn - ~ III,
HO.ta 70 70 and sneak 10 his hreihren not IN nis
sons to his sisters not 10 his aauger and Ito to speak
that lie will not acknowledre them as wives o,
not acknowledge them In that canaciiy.
the word OF the LORD concerninp Israe, "f wh,ch
these Two wives should renresant their wnoreHnna
their abominatlon and their w,cke lneSa maj "a ali
the time we nave left for that passage.
now TO all candid persons Here IA the law OF GOD
here IL the command OF the Most High general In is
nature and not limited or If be limited 1T cannot be-
proved To be Sc No law AGAINST IT, n.t II siands "a
immovable as the Rock of Aces and Will stand when
the heavens ami the earth mass away: ior n is
hi III
sor Pratt's hour mai now expired )
coNcLuDiSG ARGUMENT OF DR.. NEWMAN.
,ows:-- 4.
RESPECTED UMPiREs LADIES AND GENTLEMEN
nan gep" prior 20 my cog 70 your Guy ina, my
matics and certainly his display to-day confirms
that reputation. Unfortunately, however, he is in
correct in his Statements First he assumes thai
the staying of the male children OF the Hebrews was
continued through eighty years. He has failed
10 produce the proofs To-day This was his
starting point. lie assumes IT, Where Is
! Tue proof enher IN the Blole or IN
JoAephus ANA until lie can prove that the
years. then say thai his 4n 0 So ors
foundation than vision. Then no makes another
ounder the goS,5So men above twenty years OF
they were not the total male population OF the
Jewish nation And yet my mathematical friend
stands here to-day and declares that the whole male
population above twenty years OF age consisted OF
6o5, $780, whereas 1t is fact That this does
renee to the 22,273 first born. Tns, does not
represent the number OF families In israel mt
that time, for many OF the first Dorm were
dead. These are the Ilunders the gentleman has
made to-day; and challenge him to produce facts
to the contrary and prove that ne Is not guilty of
the assertion made Yesterday that there could not
be brought forward more IN an one or two m Stances
the Hebrews iert Egypt to the time they entered
Canaan. Has he disproved thats How has he at
tempted TO disproye IL? He has ATTEMPTED to dis
prove it BY Mathematical! problem, Which Is Daled
ON error: his premises are wrong and therefore his
conclusion is false. Why did lie not turn to King
James translation VIII help him To md
one poygamlst-Calcb. WHY did he not speak OF
Caleb and then 90 on and give US name Tor name
and date Tor date OF any other polygamst recorded
wilderness? Ladies and gentlemen he had none 10
give; and, therefore the assertion made YESTERDAY
Is true, nancy, that during me sojourn OF the ch
dren OF Israel In the wilderness, there Is but one in
stance or polygamy recorded.
Now we come to the law az laid down Yesterday
'Nei.her shalt thou take one wife to anotherJ |
rearm that the translation In tho margin III perfect
to a word. He labors 10 show that God does not
mean what he says. That phrase zone wife to an
othern may be equally rendered Zone woman to an.
other,' Or, Zone wife 10 her sister" The very same
phrase Is used In the other seven passages named
6y d.. Dwant For example. Exodus XVI, 8;
ton in these passages to be correct. II the ransa.
ton L. correct IN these passages why s 1t not
rect in The other passenger His very admission
knocks to pieces his argument. Why, tnen, does he
labor To create the impression that the HeDrew word
iSJta, meaning ''womann or "wlle,r Is not In the
10 BRING iOrtn WHAT me word dh0t ne says.
means sister, But 'sfster" Itself Is word which
meals spcCinc relation ana generic relation.
Every woman Is SISTER 10 every other woman,
anu chancnse tne gentleman TO meet me
on paper at any tihe IN tne newspapers OF your
Cltv OF ELSEWHERE upon tne hebrew ol THIS text. l
feairui II IN lne nearing oi lese learned gentle
men, reatirm ~ IN me nearing OF tnese hebraists,
tna' Wnat Is stated IN the margin IS me rue render
ing, nam y, "hei'hef shais thoti take one WHe unto
anotneT."
But supposmg that 10 incorrect. Permit me, be-
lore pass on, W remind you oi th!s lact-I0 con-
sfucs an arsumeht nc referred, ! think III ms
speech 10 tue marin. Inc margin was correct
lnen ana tnefe put u IS NOT correct now ana mere.
IL i poor RUE tiiat VIII not WORK Dotn ways--cor-
rect Wheh ne wants 10 quotc rom the margin, but
not correct when want 70 quote from the margin.
lie SET NE the example, ana IouoWcd his Illus
tflous example.
But now my friends, supposlng that the text
means just what he says nameiy--''Neither Shalt
thou take a wife unto Ter sister to vex her, sup
posing that IS the rendering, and asserts and nc
Is "a heDraist) that that Is the meaning, argued
yesterday, ana produced the proc. that this law OF
Moses is not MOruDnS--iu oil her worda