, 1870-12-28
GIruit Eeut


cEpEa or Ers1sEss on TIE CuAScEKy SIDE.
.;r tnc seco1 4 Monday o! 1auua:r, ISL. {lanua.J
c;s t1!al DOCKET vii be made rT for the January
tf11u, CONNIE eIctre Jsunazy Is, IN ~hirh viii bs
ru,rtri Al car*es set Tor heaslag IN The order Ia
wt,cn tie s1ts we:r ccMMcreeI. CpD1 htt1E
stipulation sig-ed i,t the solicitors of hota pa:tie1
tic tlr.k. will enter any. cause uPou tie tttcl
In etsc+ csses application rus, be maize to the
c~urx aron rolcs To tie Other rhtt IN the usaa1
way.
Su.au u. H4rcs vi Nrx iusIs '. Thouas $.
Ma es to tes s-.ae ,hs sa: Q, she lase senssor
lr aE!Ast 1<s!sy, tcn-ef the 1"cree CT tie Circuit
!-o:l,, en1-nsa cpsn The pe,l.cn Of Dasiel ].
sss,se ssL "'' Of s Stephen M i. Douglas % tas
.,~:.l: sn.s.: sf ::c.s.1:o. a9d w.s, At he
sn.ouni les tie accrued Interest. Do1gla8 died
IN 1unc, 1861, leAytrR Will vhich Way so1ns
rnpnih~ atle1wa1d, psuoaied, Daniel t. Khooes
order Tue will Rhoces 1t Is sslt, had auEnorlt5 to
sell the really OF the r*lAle, especially and
p1!laar1lty. 10 fsE TIE debss Ct ne c*sate. Com
r!alcaht. 1t Is avef:e1. = thin lwo years o1 the
r1snunE Of letters 1r@t.mentars, presented her
CLAN 10 Tic excculo', but payment was refused
from .,.e TO rsoe. n-t1l Al LAST taere WAS IL
fUssi absolute. Al this tlme complainant resided
aSyocd kc7s. as she has until lately, when she
le11aet Il the tLr1icac1cs OF tie case as well rs
tie fact lhs: her claim vas aapstt. Il u also
lion 10 sell the really Of sae estate, TO pay debs
and decree vas rendered to su,hor1Le e1ch gale.
" ti1s Petition It f. said that It WIS 30 en-
suntereu BY ti1pss AMI t1Asures that any pro-
cceuinRs uadc. It Should be void as TO
tie decree usde upou II 1t Is also charged that
the paps1 ElFtuE Jurisdiction, .he AIlldaFlt OF 1oE-
residence IL not In the dies Of tue court, II 1t
ever existed, and that pf1or to .ae sale. Rnn1ts,
Adele Doraias {now Mrs Williams Thomas S.
DtbolEe, John Fp1Bythe, snd othets, colspt1ed
~ 10 conduct the sale that the property should be
LouKnt IN By UobhIns i Rhodes, for the be1ent OF
TIE oontlnctlfI pAtueR. nist, hpEereT, to secure
UabQA, then ku pay uff the t1cuu6rAnces, and
thiIdlv, to ecatter the reft Aulung the pAr1ea to
the agreement. to the deiEaod!nE Of c1cditcrs-
ttg that the whole proceeding Was shoEu.
Tacfc ts further allegation that the Bou Of the
e4.Gcsa.cr, Robert II Douglas. has conveyed hls
interest In the estate to one Charles B. Far~en,
That this conveyance Tas without consideration,
znd with totec OF eoMpialnacta equities.
TROUBLE FRoa BrtfSo D0o.
Edward MlGn v GtUIEC Koch and David tiQ-
Ter. Ihts Is IN action Of trespaSs, tn which the
camaReS arc laid nj 9t0,0ce- A ctptas was sued
cut IT would ssenl t1Gn ihe AFFIDAVIT, shst plain
tn wetI with an acquaintance to Schallsf Hotel,
To Fcture roan for hin. THE 8cquetutancc was
souewh1t iEcbriaied.1 PiatnuI rendered the
price Of night 8 lodging: room was assl91ed,
bu: ErtdctiJ Huber, who waa clerk, oFleEed
tLrr, out, he te:tg. however, IN tie at Of hand.
lnE 4 key to the Iextsttgtcf The nrrns- Platctl
clsttnth his r1iy!eee, "A visitor tn p7l1.Ilc Inn
or tavern, and then vicious dog, said 10 hclouf
20 Koch, came upon tue scece Hnt did eone bit
inc. As this biting Eas g0iuE on, tie 131dlcrt
came coxu; ard be is sued on t1e ground that ht
Ea.nta,utd, In pabilc house, the ytcicus animal