, 1870-01-21


road Coupn1y. Action OF tns case. On trial
Tn,s L N action 10 recover damages Ns.d q.
5, Frason OF ne eIplosion Of loeomc ave boiler,
explosion occurred on the 18th Of December, 1851.
eneeI % II Tee % psanr sses to ssSe eeen as,dsr.
tsnce ssainst val, from the plac+ where he was
o. '-'o 'l's'ss' vox aI1ns-zns sAEos.
In tho Won CLAIM ease, which "a ueoceed&nH hy
tne Wtle for dlvorrcs under the hm1avisA men.
to psy $500 for tne puEposes Of Prodnclng testl'
n,ony On tae ~1es behalf; to be usod at fae ioftn"
coming utA. o,z.., u,,
Estate Of George Landgran. This "a an appeal
feom ~ order OF the County Court fefoslnR TO
admit an instrument, purpotin9 70 oc ths wal q
upon The ground tnat the evidence ahoWed tnat
al the time OF executing the ins&fumcns tee de'
ceased vs. within a. hour OF his deasa, ana ina!
he wns undulJ Influenced, by reason o. lsar Of
bis son, John Eanogran, the present appellant, who
waR, aidtt tue Instrument, consatuted eo:e ex-
ecuiar OF the eata,e, and, less nine hundred dol
lars sole de.sees Of the estate. valued In Matcn'
The deceased DIED Of consumption on the 14sh
dSJ Of MAT, 1862, itavog his son John. Two daugh-
WISE NARY Burkha,dt, with thsee children Of 3 dc.
ceased dsughtes Of Caroline Braun. hls hetra At
law, b. the instrument the property was left cn.
1s t. 5esq I e sases g -
apd $500 to be dtslded between the chlufeo of
Mn. Bf4un.
Ecnedusmua pa5aicisn, p,act sinx fot tae cars Of
all dneases, BY the uss o. on aao lns:tlsaen1
cInel I and aous17s 10 biz parents, iusomuen that
each OF tpem feared hin: that the old man had
therefore ntde two wills, one o. which wus ID
sSsn ri n rs he L.. aaa
s9s afsxs 15sss sResf e.a seen seP BY ae nov
In The absence OF frtents OF t1c family. II also
appears fn The caEe that John treated bis father
bJ the baumtchetd ismus proceis. Johu vas also
cree for hla misconduct, and having the custody
VI the children. II further appeara that upon the
days OF the fathers deat1 and funesal Jonn was
at ieazt Lot aober, and Vas frequently In saloons,
where he anuounceu that he had been EeaEly
beat, but bad 1xch thicgA The allegation ls tnat
he IL frunkalds ana ~ taeso thngs, as VEL
father was not Hkel; 10 dal1hellt nla other cAll-
dren in hts faror.
parents; that the old man aiw2ga said his dau4n-
iers caused him trouble aud anger, and that John
Materially assisted In bearing the expenses 81
thet houbehold.
On tr1al
Stephen VI Montgomery :. Moses Re!nenan.
and John HeItnR. AasnEpstt. Demand, Slo,uoa.
MECHANICS LIENs-
4. and I. Aubel '. James =. Cole; Position e
and me touth hal1 OF Lot s. In BlocK so original
icWn OF Hyde Park, and it1 improvements
Noah HaEso3 es Al '. Frederick Becx and Nary.
tia,ed at a2s1, on Lot 3 Block 5, Frederick B
DoWkeb addition 10 Lenont
LocoA01IoH nArEpKD ASD RKcoAFENaE
Matilda uote1. by Fer next friend, HeEU Hofer
Y, the Michigan Southern Northern 1nd!ani
Railroad Company, Acuon q ihe case ~ recovel
for pertonal Dluries Sustained by the muor plain
| tn. The a1egauun 1s that Ehe vas crossing tn
| track Of tie COMPANY at AlnsWossn stattops whe1
| a Irain came upon her with inpIoper speed ous
| overlhsev her. She cialmeo xae. Inc company
| 11ogneut waa entered Tor the fum demanded.
CASE or SECOND DIvoHCE.
| Elizabeth jenkins Y, John Jenktns. This II
s.apst s !os WeaSy otS FARMER M @ Of tbs couay Il
| Stated III the I'LL that the palte4 Retc MDfrted o.
the 14th day Of April, 1e63, at Godes1en. Caaad.
! Az the TINE Of tho raETt9ge the defendant wa
| divorced, his vile hat1D9 been 8epatnfed ffot
! hlm because Of bis M'scondact, Rcd Was tue tatle
| OF rwo children, one Of Rhnm Wss tafen b1 tn
mother. The complainant VAS Etoo6, ana M u
| Upou being married. lhe husband Gnd wife can
| to this county, bripRlrG Tt.h 1hem the husoa1d
TOY ard The wife's four boys; het eldGss M chlia,
! 10 tue proceeding thence onward lived togeihe
| until the 10Th 1nalAnt.
| Several acts Of cruelty arc 6peGued oy E0e Dill
aud it is stated generally that the cruelty exn.'
| iJxd IN thoke avtrmeutA hzs been Of almost COZ
etant repetition. it Is nald tnat on the 1st or O
tuber, 1867, the husband threw complalnan; VI
ienIly hgAiIEt a wall; that OIL the Il
Of March, 1868, he violently pushsd b.
| egstett doo1.irane; that on the 6ta Of MA
lSt9 he Struck her = blow with bis d
and nockpa her DO m; that Oh tie 18Th o. Be-
tenber last he atruek her IN the face with bis "a
that On The lNth ot EoFeuaners 1888, he nlscks
her eJe by similar process, aod that, a. last, {
| the night when she LEFT h6 house, tho 18Th Of ia
uAIy. be struck and kicked her, sEd conpeue
| her 10 leave his nonbe, b,ddlnE her ntycf 10
tQtn. which h11dug, by rE16on at hcf fear Of bic
ehe has strictly nbcyed- It IL also Iald rhAt Il
! 1uKoyerrGhle paIAtou and Violent temper OF Il
| man has beeD developed during al tn11 ans
| cruel and tnhunan treatment ol bis and p
eunR md npon Defendants animals; indeed, 70 n
extent that his 8uu left him in tnn summer OF 1s5
| Ter eldess son q1ltted early IN 1sEs. and her se
| Cpd ron SOON afterwards, while tne Fouc1st c.,
was taken svas =. tho msrr1ed uanR6ter, vi
cane 10 visit her, hnt was Compelled 70 short.
htr stay By the cotktant brutantiea OF tue ate
| father, ..
Defendant is eaid to be worth at least 500,
the cu:t1ator Of three AlLdted acres OF gTonl
Ard The owner OF one hundred and seventy acl.
FL well IA tbe postet sor Of much personal proot
! ~, to having Ate1y sold ono hundred md talI
screa fer sla,ct0. Ae is also said to oEn a h,
acre lot 10 the town OF jenerson. fe1cral horsk
; 1wehiy to twenty five head Of cattle, heVcu
: tLeep, nlih Other appultenAneos OF a weit.to-
Iarne eI, the wife's interest In which he h8s
| ceaSOred TO fCFcA her to Sign 6WSy.