Staunton spectator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1896, 1870-06-21
LegOL Notices.

Legal Notices.
| VIRGINIA :-At rules held in the Clerk
Y office of the county court of Highland coun-
ty,, on Monday, the 9th day of June, 1870,
James NJ. Woods.................... ..p plaintiff,
Allen Hite Susan Hite, Paschal d. Williams,
John Howdyshell, Rachael Hite, widow of John
>. Hite - Bolen, and Margaret A. his wife,
John Hise Horatio Hite, Ruhama Hite, Eliza
beth A. Hite, George I'll. Hite, and Jacob Hlte
(the last seven of whom are infants defendants,
IN CHANCERY
The object of this suit is to recover against the
defendant Allen Hite, the sum of SlO7.O8 with
interest thereon from April 25th 1870, till paid,
and the costs of this suit and to attach the es-
tate debts, or effects belonging to, or due, or to
become due to the defendant Allen Hite, in the
hands of the other defendants or either of Them
to satisfy the same
And it appearing from satisfactory evidence
that Allen Hite, Rachel Hite, = Bolen and
John Hte, Horatio Hite, Ruhama Hite, Ehza-
beth A. Hite George III. Hite and Jacob Hite,
are not residents of this Commonwealth it is or
dered they do appear here within month af-
ter due publication of this order and do what is
necessary to protect their interest.
jul4-4t j. G. MATTHEW, Clerk.
VIRGENIA:- AT rules held in the Clerks
Y Office of the County Court of Highland
!,
William ID: HeVener.. plaintiff,
AGAINST
William Rexrode and Mary j., his wife, John
M. Rexrode. late s. H. c., and as such admins
traitor de 6Onis non, with the will annexed, of
William Curry, decd, A. III. Armstrong, admir-
de 6onSs non OF Edward E. Curry, deceased, and
0 -''N''' in CHANCER s:ii.'' ''1'''
The object of this suit is to recover against the
defendants, VIM Rexrode and wife, 500. with
interest thereon from February 12th 1861, and
the costs Of this suit and to attach the estate,
debts effects, belonging to or due to the said
defendants Rexrode and wife, in the hands of the
other defendants or either of them.
And it appearing from satisfactory evidence
that William j. Rexrode, and Mary j. his wife,
are not residents of this Common wealth, it is or
dered that they do appear here within one month
after due publication of this order and do what
is necessary to protect their interest
jul44 w a 00p ). 9. MATHENY, Clerk.
VIRGENIA:-Ata circuit court held for
Y Highland county, on the 25th day of May,
Io70-Ellen Camron administrative of Andrew
AGAINST IN CHANCERY,
David Lockridge, George w. Lockridge, An
drew Lockridge. Elizabeth Lockridge, William
Lockridge, Robert Lockridge in his own right,
and Robert Lockridge and John Bradshaw, adj
min tors Of Robert Lockridge ST., decd f. M.
Trimble, guardian of E. Nj. Pullin, infant child
of Sarah Ann Gwin, decd, and F. NJ Trimble
and Catherine j. his wife, late Catharine J.
Gwin, Robert Sitlington, John Carpenter, Dam
lei G. Hamilton. s, a. Porter, Andrew Damron,
Jacob Z. Keister and Polly his wife, defendants.
EXTRACTS from decrees.) rt
ION motion of the plaintiffs by counsel, and it
appearing to the court that the special commits
sloner, who was directed to execute the decree
of the 18th of April, 1863 has failed to execute
the same, if is, therefore, adjudged, ordered and
decreed that one OF the commissioners of this
court will proceed to execute said decree of the
nY mr. yuh hat no
certain and state the amount due by the defend
ants to the plaintiff and that he also ascertain
and state the several amounts due from John
Carpenter, Andrew Loekridge and the estate of
Robert Lockridgs, decd to the defendant Geo.
w. Lockridge, which were attached by the pro-
ceedings in this cause, after allowing the said
parties respectively credits for any payments that
they or any other person for them, may have
made either to the plaintiffs And w. Cameron
or Geo. Sple or either of them, together with
such other matters deemed pertinent by himself
required by either of the parties to be stated
and make his report to this court in order to a
final decree herein.''
COMMISSIONERS OFFICE,
Monterey Va, June 3rd, 1870.
All persons interested in said chancery suit are
hereby notified that | have fixed upon Saturday
the 9th day of July, 1870 as the time. and my Of
fee in Monterey Highland county, Va, as the
place. for executing the foregoing decree, at
which time and place you are required to attend.
Given under my hand as commissioner In
chancery of said court, at the place and on the
june7o4t OSBORNE WILSON, Com'r
VIRGINIA AT rules held in the Clerks
' office of the County Court for Augusta, on
Monday. the 9th day of June, 1870:
Emile Richards, plaintiff, ............ In assampst
John l. stieff, Charles NJ. stieff and upon an
and Frederick P. Stieff partners
under the style of Charles NJ. J attachment
Stieff. Defendants,
In this suit the object of which is to recover of
the defendants one hundred dollars with interest
thereon from the 9th day of March, 1870, till paid
the plaintiff having filed his declaration and the
defendants not having been served with the sum-
mons in this suit with the attachment there
in and it appearing by an affidavit filed that the
said defendants not residents of this State, it
is ordered that the said John l.. Stief, Charles
NJ. Stieff and Frederick P. Stief, partners under
the style of Charles nj. Stietf, do appear here
within one month after due publication hereof,
and do what is necessary to protect their interest
in this suit. a cOpy-teste.
WILLIAM 4. BURNETT, Clerk.
A. EEL. FULTz, p q. june74w
EA1SSOLUTkON OF GO-Parsnership.
4 J The firm of CLAY & JOHNSON has been
dissolved by mutual consent. Cecil Clay has
bought out the other interest and continues the
business at Clifton Forge. All accounts of the
old firm will be settled by the undersigned.
june7-3t# CECIL CLAY.
r have appointed Mrs c. A. Brockmeyer to do
a. general Grocery and Dry Goods business,
to buy and sell for cash only in the town of
Covington, Allegheny county, Virginia.
mar29-3mos G. A. BROCKMEYER.
nj OFFICIAL persons indebted to the es-
~ tate of George T. Antrim dec d, by note or
otherwise, are hereby requested to come forward
at and pay up, it is necessary to settle the
estate at an early day, and we do not desire, ex-
cept where it is absolutely necessary, to pursue
more stringent measures for the collection of the
outstanding debts.
All persons having claims against said estate
are also requested present them for settlement.
u MM Il. Z dA ALb7M ELL, Executors.
mar22-tf