New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-03-17
THE COURT rs.
eycsrun,asut against the COrOn~~-suit for
Damnges-Cla m sic ,OOC

IN the FOurtn DlsbfICt Soui', o@o''"'
as follows:
He alleges that on or about the nineteenth
of January, 1870, when John u. hoach,
Coroner of the parish of Orleans, entereo
the dwelling house OF petitioner, NO. oo'
Magazine street, about half past Six O'CLOCK
in the evening. accompanied by nVe MeH'
and IN a very abrupt and dlscOurteous indn-
ner informed the wife OF petitioner thaI 'ne
object of his visit was to hold an inquest Oh
the body of Edward Warren, a clergyman,
who had that day died. Roach thereupon
administered an oath to Mrs. Beasley, anu
also to the individuals who came Win
him, and Immediately thereafter demanded
the effects of the deceased. Roach was IN
formed that Mr.. Ware had died OF con.
sumption, and that a certificate to that
effect had been given by a physician.
Petitioner informed Roach tnat the death OF
MIR Ware was not accompanied with sus
picious or unnatural circumstances, ana no
necessitv existed for the services OF Cor
oper. Notwithstanding this, Roach TOOK
kinto his possession the private papers and
| books of the deceased, and ABOUT thirteen
dollars in United States currency, and
still refuses TO deliver them up 10
petitioner, who was frien0 TO
| deceased, had attended to him III his
| last Illness and administered to has wants
| and necessities on previous occasions. re-
/ titioner SAYS that he then and there pro-
1
acts OF the defendent. and was su0sequentiy
! violently seized by him, without legal
authority, placed in q vehicle, and con-
signed to the Fourth District Police lookup.
That dettndent, who went with him, appled
| 20 him (petitioner), opprobflous ana ID.
| sulting eplthets, such as damned ioa1ef,
| DAMNED thief" etc, and conducted himself
toward petitioner in an outrageous and IN
sulting manner. That on arriving at the
poice station, the said defendant ma.
iiciousIy, wrougfulIy and unjustly Intending
to harrass, oppress aud injure petitioner N
his good name and credit. and TO bring him
inte public scandal, intamy and disagree,
caused him to be confined IN d leioiis cen ,
where he remained until the following day,
at ten O'Clock, at which time he was
released on giving bond for has appearance.
Subsequently said defendant appeared be-
tore Recorder jackson, and falsely and
mGliciously charged petitioner with resist
ing an officer in the discharge OF his duty.
Petitioner says that OF the tWenty-secono
January, he appeared before the Recorder
for examination, and was acquitted re-
tisioner alleges that Immediately alter MS
aoeuittal, defendant returned to his dOmlcll,
and caused the body of Mr. Warren to De
dissected (Which dissection fully verified
the certificate Of the physiclan), demanded
towels and shirts, which he tore in pieces to
suit his convenience, ordered the Wife ol
!
threatened her in a. violent and terrifying
manner, and conducted himself so barbar-
| ousiy as seriously and permanently 10 impair
| her health, there by causing incalculabie IN
Jury Petitioner further alleges that he mas
always borne q good name, and 0y reason Of
the uuwarrantable acts OF defendant, ant
the publication of his name in the newspa-
pers he has suffered great anxiety aud men.
tai ana physical pain, and has been damaged
10 the amount of $4,000. He prays judg
| meDt for the sum claimed and costs.
J. Il. Ferguson, attorney for petitioner.
Seventh District COurt-fsSiIroa Dad suis fe'
| Damages
Mrs. Ann Trinable Us. Crescent CEty Rdlt
road Company.-The pianth represent
; that the Crescent City Railroad Company.
indebted to her in the sun OF Sj632, 10
| this: That en- or near the corner OF SecOnt
| and Annuu citation streets, on the thlr!leti
of January. 1870. she was struck by tn
) mule ia car No. A, belonging TO the com
pany. and knocked down on the track. IN
wheel Of the Car ran parti&liY over an'
against her left ankle, injuring the bone
: ligaments and flesh in sucn manner as t
, | cripple her for life. She represents that he
, face and left side were considerably bruised
and she has been confined more or less Il
her bed ever since, and disabled from actIY
eXertion.
Petitioner represents, that at the time O
>
about two feet from the track, waiting to-
Che car to paes, when it came along, will
the mule driving in gallop, and going at
= rapid and reckless speed. When near the
Z plaintiff the driver whipped the mule ant
rushed it to such an extent that 1t jumped
, Of the track, spd in getting back On II
struck complainant and knocked her down
so that she was struck by the wheel and IN
inred rs before stated. Petitioner allege
: that she is now sixty years OF age, and O.
: her injuries has been disabled from makin
a livelihood, for all of which defendents ar
responsible. Cotton & Levy. of counsel.
sapreme Court OF Louisiann-Condense
\ Decisions.
8 S, Voolfolk, ct al, Us. f. WOOJ0lE-
f Appeal from the Parish Court OF lbervllle-
b. | Howell, J. The heirs at-law OF Austin Woo
folk obtained judgment for partition, tn
Z | propertv Was offered for sale, and certal
. parties intervening, enjoined the sale.
motion was made 10 dissolve the iDjunctio
4 Oh the ground that the injunction bond wa
insufficient. The motion to dissolve wa
| oyerruled, the Judgment signed, and fou
days allowed to furnish additional security
The defendants in injunction appealed
e motion is made to dismiss the appeal on In
ground that the Judgment is interlocutory
@ | and not q final one. PeE cMl'idne. The jude
o sment is clearly an interlocutory one
| the effect of which is to d.
+ Law the sale and ultimate pa
n tition; but there is nothing in the facts or /
n the character of the property going to shoy
that the delay will work an irreparable in
n jury to the appellants. Mere delay will nc
T authorize the interference of the Appe
- ate Court-1l Martin, 276; IL Martin, 4S>
II 3N. s., rs; Is L., 528. If the interlocutor
Y Judgment be erroneous, it may be obviate
o by appeal from the final jndgment-3 4
Z 457. The refusal to dissolve on the face {
q the papers left the case as it was when tn
a Injunction was granted. The Judge q qat
believing the cause for the Injunction to
good and sufficient, did not err in permitin
|. additional security to be given, as anothe
4 writ could have been Immediately granted
3N s., 4S0; N. s.. 400; 8 An, 487.
a We must determine whether an appe,
a lies, before we can inquire into the correct
:. ness Of judgment. Appeal dismissed.
United States District Court-Juds
Duren.
eI In the suit of the United States vs.. Catlil
y wherein defendant is charged with havin
s failed to give correct return OF the liquor
distilled by him, the trial has been pre-
ceeding several days before a jury. This
y a case instituted some time ago by Super
visor Creecy.
- The jury yesterday brought in 8 verde
) for the defendant
:, The late massacre of the Piegan Indian
}, with the disclosure of its atrocities, ha
,. brought out General Sherman in a stat
ment charging the responsibility upon Gen
= eral Sully, Notwithstanding Sully's denu
!. Citations of the horrible affair. The fact
. briefly stated appear to be these: Gener
l. Sheridan, in military charge of all ths
l. Northwestern region to the Rocky Mouy
e | fo1ns or0nactad to Gnnprat Gharrpon OF