New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-11-10

leans. Mobile and Chattanooga Railroad
Comnanv VS.. city ct al; injunction square
Il A; put at issue BY the city; still pending
nC No. iii Gi;5s5, Second District Court-suc
cession Of John McDonogh; claim of Moses
Fox; still pending, not tried.
No. 1865, Sixth District COurt-Bosworth
ct al. vs. city; commissions and salaries OF
Waterworks Commissioners, $50 ,538 80; still
pending, not tried.
No. 1907, Fifth District Court-Jcnnings
VS.. city ct al; injunction to restrain enforce
ment Of judgment; still pending, not tried.
No. 2lO, Eighth District Court-City Va.
Girardey & Co.; city notes, 1913 1926; com
menccd by the city; still pending, not tried.
No. 2l3, Eighth District COurt-De Mon
astino vs.. Shaw ct al; mandamus certlfl-
Gates, $3.50 95; put at issue by the city;
still pending, not tried
No l2,546, Third District Court-Stewart
VS.. city ct al; injunction to restrain execu-
ton Of judgment; still pending, not tried.
No. 223, Eighth District Court-LOuisiana
National Bank VS.. Walton ct al; manda-
mus, Metropolitan Police warrants; put at
issue by the city; still pending, not tried.
No. 224, Eighth District COurt-Lafon VS..
Walton ct al. mandaMus, Metropolitan
Police warrants; put at issue by the city;
tried, Judgment against the city.
No 3496, Seventh District COurt-Blanch-
ard vs.. city ct al; injunction to restrain ex-
ecution Of judgment; still pending. not
tried.
Sixth District Ccurt-Watkins, Campbell.
surrogate. vs.. city; salary as assessor,
$1,000; Judgment against the city; No AZ,
Supreme Court; pending.
Second District COnrt-City praying for
opening of Rocheblave street; commenced
by the city; Judgment in favor OF the city;
No. 1913. Supreme Court; pending.
No 1856, Fourth District Court-City
vs.. Robert; license on profession: com,
menced by the city; judgment i'll favor OF
the city; No. 100, Supreme Court; pend
ing.
No. 23,9l9, Fourth District Court-City
vs.. Bienvenu; icense ON profession; com
menced by the city; judgment in favor OF
the city: No. 1920, Supreme Court; pend
ing.
Sixth District Court-City vs.. Battles &
Co.: license on profession; commenced by
tho city; No. 1880, Supreme Court: pend
ing; can't find transcript.
No. 1879, Fifth District COurt-City VI
Fisk; violation city ordinance; commenced
by the city: judgment in favor Of the city
No. l347, Supreme Court, pending.
Sixth District Court-City vs. Peasant; Ii
cense on profession, $4,000; commenced b,
the city; Judgment against the city; No
1893, Supreme Court; pending.
No. 2O.099, Fifth District Court-City VS.
Model; license On profession; commenced
by the city; Judgment against the city; No
1889, Supreme Court; pending.
No. 20,OSS Fifth District Court-Citv vs.
Mora; license on profession. commenced BY
the city; Judgment against the city: No
ISf0 y,orItu~
No. 2O,O9S Fifth District Court-City VS.
johnson; license for sale Of lottery tickets
commenced by the city, Judgment agains
the city; No. lS4l, Supreme Court; pend
No. 10000. Fifth District Court-City VS.
Bornio; license for sale of lottery tickets
commenced by the city. judgment agains
the city; No. 1912, Supreme Court; pend
ing: o ,o- ,,.e., c:.
Ugarte e. Grigalva; license; commenced b!
the city; judgment against the city; No
l843 Supreme Court; pending
Fifth District Court-City VS.. Quenn: il
cense; commenced by the city; judgmen
against the city; No. 1874, Supreme Court
No. Il, aea, Fifth District Court-City vs.
Ruleff ct al; injunction TO restrain execu
ton of judgment; commenced by the city
Judgment against the city. No. 1864. Su
preme Court; pending.
No. 1888, Third District .Court-City vs.
Home Mutual Insurance Company; license
commenced by the city; Judgment agains
the city; No. 3l56 Supreme Court; pend
ing.
City VS.. PicOu; commenced by the city
Judgment in favor OF the city; No. 1857. ST.
prone Court; pending.
City vs.. Mayo ct al: violation Of city or
dinance: commenced by the city; judgmen
against the city; No. 1861, Supreme Court
pending.
Walker; litigated suit; commenced by tn
city. judgment in favor of the city; Nc
1878, Supreme Court; pending.
City Of Jefferson rs. Stock Landing Com
pany; commenced BY the city; No. Si6, Su
NO No. i4,7aS. Fifth district court-Jone
vs. Police Jury, right bank. parish Of Or
leans; damages. annullmeDt Of contract
$500; put at issue by the city; judgmen
against the city; No. 274O, Supreme Court
No. $50, Seventh District Court-Polic
Jury, right bank, vs.. Jones ct al; injunc
ton to restrain execution of a judgment
judgment against the city; No. 24l, Su
preme Court; pending.
No. 1895, Sixth District Court-Sadler We
the city fees of Office of Justice of tn
Peace, s49S IS; still pending not tried.
No. 1896, Sixth District COurt-Platts
mler VS.. the city; fees of Office Of Consta
BILE, $3.50; still pending, not tried.
No. 2O,03S, Fifth District Court-City w
Adams, Richards g. Co.; litigated suit
Judgment against the city; No. lS45, ST.
preme Court pending.
No. 24,325 Fourth District Court-Cit
S-, ii n.o<.1 al
| ing, not tried.
No. 239, Eighth District COurt-Lucy vs.
| the city; injunction to restrain execution o
fieri facias; still pending, not tried.
No. 1899, Sixth District Court-Brown We
! the city; contract for digging canals
| $S1Sl IA still pending not tried.
No. 245. Eighth District Court-Collins 1
Tabor VS.. the city; printing contract, $300S
| still pending, not tried.
| No. 249, Eighth District Court-Collins 4
| Tabor VS.. Shaw, Administrator; mandarin:
| 1852; still pending, not tried.
No. 81 sos, Fourth District COurt-Mel
| chants Mutual Insurance Company Vs. tn
| city ct ais; inj junction to restrain executio
! of Judgment still pending, not tried.
No. IA, Eighth District Court-Magazin
| Street Railroad Company VS.. City of Jeffel
| son: Injunction in railroad controversy; sti
| pending, not tried.
No. 1907, Sixth District C0urt-Hart VI
the city; crier fees. $42222;; still pending, nc
| tried.
Fourth District Court-City VS.. Hire
damage to city property, fence, $500; put a
issue by the city; still pending, not tried
No. 81, Eighth District Court-Hernal
dez va. Mayor ct al; mandamus on ccrtit
Gates, $4l3l is; put at issue by the city; sti
pending, not tried.
No. 6245. United States Circuit Court
City vs. Morgan batture property; pu
at issue by the city; still pending, not trie'
| No. 1919, Sixth District Court-Ochigl'
vioh VS.. the city; damages. loss of good
Pontchartrain railroad shed, $500; sti
| nen1iDc not triad