, 1870-08-04
Circuit Court.

PARTNERSHIP DIFFICULTY.
11ncc DfIUnRh =. George P. "ul5e. This Is q
proceeding commenced on the chancery at.ie OF
thia court; f0T the dissolution md settlement Of
cop rtnership ID drug store. Complainant
Goth Gay u Masch last tnere xppe2ted In TIE
CHICAGO IA1EuNK An advertisement, az fotlowa:
Partner Eantsd-A =. silent partner II tae drug
otnee," on ths following day 3 fut.hez knuo1nce-
meut appeAlett U tho effect that such silent part
ner wss wsn,sd. be to hare capita! Of T. sto and
,,sa been eat4eAshcd during fourteen
,eaM had , so9a nGs!neas oa,, and r. .si =.
control, which he pfoposed to embark fn sone en-
'efrrse seeming to paey I safe ryuns he Answered
saee 80 q xao ' was Is asas @ IL s ~ sspss
Is OF an arothccaky CLERK tn thls city. He had
inserted the notices, aud he 1t WIS VINO dealret
II eligible business in which to invest hts skll
tna The connt.tng Inaa's MONEY, He offered let
.ers to show thai he was able 10 conduct such
rusted. Complainant kas, md hearI Adj BE-
.leved. He adraucsa 81, ,too required as present
ncans To purchase the b1ore ani n.ock. and sE1ee.
Il. up The stock, and formed tie alliance. If being
lgrrt,l that Wol1e should Conduct the business
.nl complainant should RECEIVE the half Of the
IN Of Ap1ti last, lis location being 80. oos stase
nv ,hc slpula.r'l tun4s, drarlng none
}
money nS The r.f,.ce;a- Notwithstanding all ttl6,
It ts chstgru .i=: defendant has for some months
lrFlectcd the business. devntsng his time to tho
eotupaDionshtE Of women OF low character and
feprAycd hAhlts, allowing theln to Sisit him IN q
,att room, Of the store. and It last bringing a
oeImsnent assocsats u me hacs e :. spa.sment
II "JosIe, AMI spending eEcn the hours Of bus-
les1 In her society, while cu2tnmeEa were allowed
s.,hin Tie cosni1snce VI The nesehbofs, tae rrsnit
whereof has fren depreciation VI the a.nonnt Of
Isily receipts equal 70 tWo1hinls OF the sum the
be ssiS of July list, Wolfe wss srrested Tor ss. s
aultinE this 1nlstresa 0t HIS, 50 that ne remained
week u the County Js!L a! v ths eomplat1.
aAs ruined the businesA Injunction issued to ro-
,t1aln dttenlant a 10 thls concern-
| 6AFKIf or fTk rUBlc RECORDS.
In times past the freedom OF acccAs to the booka
IT recor1 in the Recorders oilce Of Cook County
presented opportunities Tor the h,terasloo ana mn.
silaton Of tflelr contents II has happened several
wss not long a.nce tried tn the United States CIR
<ut Court 1hcre the Testimony tende,i to proSc
and probably did prove concluslrc1y, iast thers
had been the efssuIe Of 1n hduendum TO the zig
/ nAturr, the eject Of which eEasute was to com
2letc chain Of 1.t'e II the person Of one Of III,
luesnts THIS liability Of fraud seems now u
changes and frauds, and the use Of Ink, unless m
'leI supervision, ID now prohibited among III
shvf saat5ed ct A. makng
I'll But there Il a constant use Of Ink for the en
try OF sausfacs1ons upon mortgages, etc. To thi
rflt the clerk tn charge Of the Toom has under h1
control single bottle With pens, which, in sue
| taset arc used under his personal supervision.
I Superior Court.
FRoeEKnlSGs TO SET AslnE sAEH-
John @. Rogers '. ElahA W. willard. Bin 10 X
aside mortgage sale OF Lots IS to 50. In Block
uf Out lot q, School TIustceA Subdivision OF Sex
tion 16, S. u, title to which complainant claim
under Snertn'a deed maie 10 4 purchaser II CIT
| u uton sale and assigned.
TUB STATE STREET w1p6H1SG.
[ Appe1t Of Charles q. E PIuss1h&. This Is a.
appeal taken ~ Ar. Prus1lng from the order Q
| the Common CouHctI confirming the a&sestmen
; | or widening State street run Jackson to THsr
:5-SecGnd street lii. ITus4lng objected to III
! propoaed change IN The street. u tho owne
Htnc North and south halTes Of Suh!ot /, Of Lot
| a{oek IL. and the north bali Of Sub-}ot OF th
; Amc lor, IN Block II, for fractional Section /!
.ddttlon. and tho brick buildings thereon. III
| onreaint IL thai the kutu Ut $l,1<261. Awafie
Is damages 70 the land. II 10000 les5 than th
. ! ctNai daEa2ga which viii be sns,slned: ard -
, | lam aRe 10 Tie brick buildings MOI 80 aud y
: STATE street, and % The frame structure No. 81
ssesaest At sts,1, "a also teas than the rest DAG
. lge to be done, because the property being ooei
l ped ~ M extensive vinegar t2ctoTJ, It Will
NECESSARY 10 break up appellants business ~ II
i,ofDt, rendering necessary Tho removal Of Ill b
, I nachInefy. He also complains that benefits q
Erpn8tn}i5 assessed Against him. md that Z
| whole asseeuntnt i unfair.