New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-09-03
THE COURTS.
Eighth District Court.

James Fl. Young vs. Magazine Street
! Railroad Company-Magazine Street Rail
road Company VS.. James II. Young-Maga-
| ziue Street Railroad Company vs.. City of
Jefferson-The following rule has been
| taken in this case: On motion Of counsel
| for John w. Hillman, and on suggesting to
| the Court that one John SteiO, one b. SaIoy
| and one Charles Lausr, have caused the
! Magazine street railroad and all its appur-
| tenances, the property IN litigation in the
above entitled suits to be seized by the
Sheriff of the parish of Orleans, under
| executory process in certain suits in the
Honorable Seventh District Court for this
parish, entitled John Steib VS.. Magazine
Street Railroad Company, B. Saloy VS.. Maga-
zine Street Railroad Company and Charles
Lauer VS.. Magazine Street Railroad Com
pany. NCs. $3.50, 1851 and 1852; and on further
suggesting to the court that the said rail
roads have been previously -sequcstered
by this court and John w. Hulman had
been appointed judicial sequestrator as re-
ceiver, and that the property was legally in
the possession Of and under the control and
jurisdiction of this court at the time the
process aforesaid issued, and upon further
suggesting to the court that the. said SalOy
had obtained a writ of injunction from the
Honorable Seventh District Court for this
parish. restraining and en- joining the said
Hillman from receiving or taking possession
of the property in litigation i'll the suits II,
I3 and H. in this court, under the order Of
this court, all Of which will appear by the
record No. 1851 of the docket of the Seventh
District Court aforesaid.
That all the said suits are brought with a
view to harrass and defeat the action OF
this court and its officer, the said Hillman,
and in contempt of the authority of this
court.
1t is ordered tha. John Steib, B. Saloy
and Charles Lauer do show Cause, on
Wednesday, September I. 1870, at ten
o'clock A. M., why the said suits in the
Seventh District Court should not be trans
ferred to this court, and why they should
not be enjoined from interfering with John
w. Hillman as receiver herein, and from all
further proceedings Ii said suits IN said
court.
State of Louisiana VS.. F. R. Boehler ct al
In this case the plaintiff has fled an
amended and supplemental petition, as fol
| lows:
1t is alleged that since the filing of the
original petition, petitioner has discovered
| that State warrant No. 2li. for $1,000, issued
| july -. 1870. in favor of S. n. Isaacs, one
| of the defendants herein. in payment of 24l
| coupons cOunterfeited by him and his con-
| federates, Boeh,er and Falk, has been paid
| by the State Treasurer, and that said par
| ties. f. 2. Boehler, +. Falk and 5. A. Isaacs,
| in addition to the sum demanded IN the
| original petition, are indebted, ,n soltio, to
| the State of Louisiana in the sum of $1,000,
| for which petitioner prays Judgment after
due citation of each one of said parties,
and that a supplemental writ OF attach
| ment issue, the anneXea affidavit being
| considered, and the same be main
tanned. and all property attached held
| subject TO the entire sum claimed in original
! and amended petition, to-wit: three thou
sand dollars, and that A. s. Badger, Super
intendent of Metropolitan Police, be made
| garnisher herein and ordered to answer,
within the legal delay, the annexed inter
rogatories; and that petitioner be paid by
privilege and preference out of the pro-
ceeds OF the property attached-which pc
titioner prays be sold-or out of the property
| itself. If cash, and for costs and general re-
| lief.
The petition was sworn, to by Governor
| Warmoth. and the writs of attachment and
| garnisllment, as prayed for, were issued by
order Of Judge Dibble.