New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1870-11-23

,c cour, on the right Of the veterans OF the Home to
vote thor sentiments He thinks ina. " was uoyn1n
" ch WAS not involved IN the case petore tne OpuTt!
t,t thr Cont made decision In violation of law and
in cc and that the right Of suffrage on me par, o, te
S,rras nj the Home h unquosiOnabe ~ NAV or my
ciher citizen Of the state These are his opinions OK
MES. before and since the election He never wrote
sGcl letter ms The correspondent attributes To him.
The Missouri Republican continues its eXult-
at r. at it's political companion of fortnight ago, as
follows: "Our contemporary. The De"ocru Is gradually
awakng to consciousness Of the fact that IL IA not
Jolly as A. expected 10 he Its New Party movement has
'panned out very poorly The bolt nj jefferson City
~ successfu,yerv successful. Brown il elected and
urz has gone back to Washington greater and stronger
Aim he ever before; but ts the whole summing
uaf encouraging. The loss of the Legislature; the
ioss OF ST. Louis County; the loss OF TIE Win and
TXth Congress Districts: the loss Of a large ma
rity The equities IN the state and the reelection OF
Vols to Congress In the LIST District in spite Of the FIT
rnth Amendmcnt-thcse facts that far Outweigh
the strictly personal triumph which Brown aud schurz
have received at the hands OF the discriminating Demoo
icy, that The Democrat Is forced turn sorrowfully
away from the contemplation Of the sicy specter Of the
tArl party and seek for readmssion into the MeClg
and Schz does not console II for tho loss Of the familiar
nrai-Icts Of the old party, that. whole thing
with its old friend Drake"
The Detroit Tribune, commenting on the Oft
rcleated remark, the part Of the Democratic papers,
That Tie Republican party is going to ruin, bnks that
If the Democracy had large majority theft oppo-
ncnts in the next Congress il would enjoy going 10 ruin
in that way. AS TO the "new party" movement, The
Tribune says: 1.-THE talk about reorganization of par
ties Is inst now the bugbear and how much does amount
to- II appears TO have secured two prominent Western
papers. who viii have plenty Of time between this and
the presidential election to modify their views.
OF the public men, named favorng the movement not
one has consented 10 be considered as c0lDnto to IL
We have doubt the projectors Of 1t materially dis
appointed IN the amount OF they have re-
ceiyed The Missouri movement viii he judged by its
fruits II il shall develop into Democracy pure and
simple. II will most assuTedly not be accepted as Re-
publican precedent As the discussion has gone on we
have watched it narrowly and have especially noted this
that both the assumed facts upon which the new
movement Is be founded and the strength that will
probably to it, based upon In many instances
the most palpable transformation and erroneous deduc-
lions The great fact 10 be considered in future party
and defeats In party relations Is che large
that made expression whatever this year 1Dere
some weight argument that If IT. had not been
dis1neced it would have out but, II 1t had come
out, how would 10 have voted Is more practical qnes
ton. Many grumbles at home against the man
agemeut OF his party who, on the whole prefers IT, and
when he goes TO the polls votes for it,"