New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-11-10

Magazine street RAILROAD OF d. ~, e1'sv
road and stock; put at issue by the c1'y'
still pending. not tried.
No. n. Eighth District Court-New VI,
leans Mobile and Chattanooga Railroad
COMPANY Vs. city ct al. for injunction re-
straininS city from interfering, ETC.; put as
issue by the city; still pending. not tried.
No. 1881, Fourth District Court-Slmoh
va city and Sheriff for injunction to re
| strain sale OF furniture; put ut issue by the
| CITY: still pending not tried.
M a5. Eighth District Contribution VS..
o;+,- az ii for damages police officer; put at
;ssEe bv the city; still pending, not tried.
No. iJl5. Fifth District Conrt-Clty w.
| Merchants Mutual Insurance COMPANY .of
claim for licenses; commenced Dy tno ci's'
No. 1899. Fifth District Court-Clty VS..
J. r. Young for claim for licenses; con
menced by the city; still pending, not u'eSl'
No. 1918, Fifth District COurt-Clty IS.
! Crescent Insurance Company for clam lor
licenses; commenced by the city; STU
| pending. not tried. w..
| Factors IN surance Company; license claim;
| commenced by the city; still pending' no'
| tried. C..
| Workin oner's Insurance Company; license
! claim; commenced by the city; still pend
| inc. not tried. c..
| VS.. Snoderass license claim; commenced
| by the city: still pending, not tried.
| No. a47I, Seventh District Court-City We.
| Theisman: license claim; commenced oy
the CITY; still pending, not tried.
| No. 2s56. Seventh District Court-City We:
| Dixie g. Deshon license claim: commences
by The city; still pending. not tined.
Lane; license claim; commenced oy the
! ciry. still ueuding not tried.
| No. oS0I, Seventh District Court-Clty
! VS. Smith 81 Co.; license claim; CONNIE neen
by the city; still pending, not tried.
No 1890, Sixth District Court-Jameon
vs.. city; htigated Judgments; put at issae
| by the city; still pending, not tried.
No. 10. 4S4, Third District Court-City VS..
De 81. Romes; ltigated Judgments; CON-
menced BY the city: still pending, not tined.
No. Ii, 49,, Third District Court-City vs.
De st. Roines; Irrigated judgments; COM
menccd by the city; still pending, not tined.
No. u. iS6. Third District Court-City vs.
De St. Romes; litigated Judgments; COM
menced by the city; still pending, not tried.
No. i0.i s7, Third District COurt-City vs..
| De st. Rones; litigated Judgments; com
! menced by the city; still pending, not tried.
| No. lG, 4sS. Third District Court-City Vs.
De st. Romes litigated Judgments; COM
menced by the city; still pending, not tied.
| No. 1852, Seventh District COurt-Clty
VS.. e. c. Palmer; license claim; commenced
| by the city: still pending, not tried.
| No. 1S5, Sixth District COurt-C1ty VS..
| Spearing: license claim; commenced BY the
| city; still pending, not tried.
No. 1854, Sixth District Court-City vs.
Dusora: license claim; commenced by the
city tried; still pending.
| No 1918, Sixth District Court-Thomas
VS.. city; htigated judgments; put at issue
| by the city: still pending, not tried.
| No. l51s, Fifth District Court-City vs.
| Home Mutual Insurance Company; license
claim; commenced by the city; still pend
| ing. not tried
| No. 1913. Fifth District Court-City VS..
| Sun Mutual Insurance Company; license
claim; commenced by the city; still pend
| ing. not tried.
| No. 1919, Fifth District Court-City vs..
| Grant; license claim; commenced by the
! city; still pending. not tried.
| No. iJ43, Fifth District Court-City ys.
| Simpsons& CO.. license claim; commenced
| by the city: still pending, not tried.
No. 1914, Fifth District COurt-Clty va.
| Care: license claim; commenced by tGe
city: still pending not tried.
No. l545, Fifth District Court--City vs.
Mackey: License claim; commenced by tie
| city: still pending, not tried.
| No. 1915 Fifth District Court-City VS..
! Sanford Il Black; license claim commenced
| by the city; still pending, not tried.
No. lji1, Fifth District Court-City vs.
f! Wood & Hcbson; license claim; commenced
! by the city; still pending, not tried.
| No. l54S. Fifth District Court-City vs.
| Port Il Elliott; license claim; commenced
! 10y the city; still pending, not tried.
| No. 1875, Fifth District Court-City We.
| Louisiana Mutual insurance Company; IL
cense claim; commenced by the city: still
pending, not tried.
No. 1917, Fifth District Court-City vs..
! New Orleans Insurance Company; license
..l.r Inv hn SfIlf
| in. not tried.
! No. 24,0eA Fourth District Court-Shihf
q q. vs.. Michel; title to property, city
called IN warranty; put at issue by the city;
| stiN pending not tried.
! No. 10,Q50, Fourth District Court-City
| praying Tor release Of mortgage; Water
works; commenced by the city: still pend
| ing, rot tried.
No IS. Eighth District Court-Lockwood
W. Bailey ct al; city intervention drainage
| tax; nut at issue by the city: Judgment
against the city; appealed, transcript not
| fled.
No. a4,osa Fourth District Court-city
! Us. Hauley eJ al; appearance bond. $1,000;
commenced by the city; still pending, not
! tried.
No. Co.'s United States Circuit Court
| Morgan VS.. New Orleans. Mobile and Chat
! tanooga Railroad ct al. Injunction; put at
issue by the city; still pending. not tried.
/ NJ. 10, ElSNtu DlStIlct SOurt-DutIer w.
| city ct a.: damages, police officer, $50o0;
put at issue by the city; still pending, not
tried.
No. 2..O97. Fourth District Court-Citv
VS.. New Orleans City Railroad Company;
damages, loss of horse, $3.50: commenced
by the city; still pending, not tried.
! No II, Eighth District Court-Haulev vs.
! city e. al; damages, police officer. SO. coo;
p9' AZ ISSUE bg the city; still pending, ROT
tried.
| No 5l0i, Seventh District Court-Locan
| Us. e!ty: professional services, $1,000; put az
issue by the city; still pending, not tried
No. 1911, Fourth District Court-Css-
! seriy vs. city; contract to use water, $2c,-
260 10; put at issue by the city; still pend
| ing. not tried.
No. 81. Eighth District Court-New Or
! leans and Ship Island Canal Company 70.
| city Ct al: mandamus to indorse 100000
bonds; pct at issue by the city; Judgment
against the city; appealed, transcript not
! filed.
No 50, Eighth District Court-Honi re
vs.. West ct al; mandamus to give lines and
levels; put at issue by the city; tried; still
! pending.
No. 1853, Fifth District Court-Howard
vs., city; injunction to stay proceedings on
| judgment; still pending. not tried.
No. 2l.i23, Fourth District Court-City
| praying FOR opening OF Union street; con-
meneed by the city, still pending, not
| tried.
No. IS, Eighth District Court Spaldinr
| vs.. City OF Jefferson; claim for damages:
put at issue by the city; still pending, noa
, tyied
No. 3{.l22. Fourth District Court-yyolYa.