The New York herald., 1870-04-09

Ing ceased my connection With II on the lat OF Aprn
the Tribune ONCE; he used to walk to Samuel SIN
clair's onice 4 he were engaged he would
himself; hs was On terms Of Familiarity with MIN;
ac once sWo q three times week; 70 ); never saw Si%
there oftener than once 9 day; Iaon,t know tOaI
the otice except my brother
q. How long did you know Albert D. Richarosonr
o. Didwou know MIN TO carry pistols A. No.
sir; never saw one with him.
after he went TO the editorial room Of the Tribune
after the alleged shootings A. No. sir; was not In
O. Have you had any conversation with any per-
son as to who took Richardson's pistols 4. NO. sir
Hsys You seen n t ssme ts s2a fs s
q. When was thatf A.. In 1885, IN the fall prior to
lsss saw them two Or three ,is lines u, enc,
brother; Mr.. Mcfarland came In, and seeing Rich.
ards0n taking 10 him he turned away and
in May; when Richardson passed out there were
was talking to me at the time.
q. When before May, 1869 did you see them meet
there t0gether2 A. don't remember the MONTH
Q. On that occasion how long were they ON the
premises eN togesherr s don. NJ remember sa.n -.
Re.direct-Did you read that letter. (Thc witness
had been reading the letter previously handed TO
%. Q. Did you ever read it before today A. Mr.
O. You recognize that to be what he read you .
copy of A. Yes. sir great portion Of It.
@ When did ne read II to your A. Some time
o. How ,ong have you known Mr.. Mcfarland A.
q. Did you see him show that letter to your
| brothers A.. / did not
O. You would know the contents ~ Of thar letter TO
! think would, SIR.
| TESTIMONY OF EDWARD WATSON
Edward Watson examined-I reside in Brooklyn
| opAa am
| been for twenty years; don't know Mrs Calhoun's
handwriting; she is correspondent 0f the ir1a.e;
] Mr.. Reid or Mr. Cummings should think could tell
TESTIMONY or JOHN o'RRIEN. f,s
John O'Rren testifed--I reside at WestmOreand
| Hotel; am CLERK there; have seen Mr.; McFarand
before to-day; have been employed there year
| 25tn OF November; saw him about eight or half
past eight p. NJ; ne came IN ana wanted room; ne
with him to his roohi about ten minutes later two
persons came In and inquired n there were any
wen. ''ai up and s TOOK MIN away: Mr. Mcfarland
looked very ncrvous he stared at me very vacanty;
very wild; lie would pick up a paper; throw II
down. go out, and pick 1t up again; watched him
very closely after that; his conduct struck me as
! very suspicious; his conduct struck me as ira
tional; / intended TO stay up all night myself and
that night; Mr.. Mcfarland entered his name ON
| the register; l have the register here treglster
York; / assigned him the room No 81; The
writing Daniel Mcfarland is identlcally as 1t was;
| Counsel for dcience-There seems - DO StrAAko
| formation about the ''nd," indicating tremuious-
ness; Is that as IL wasf
a. Yes sir; there was one small boy saw them
| To Mr.. Garvin-Ths up stroke Is check to show
To the Recorder did not ask him; he paid It
10 Judge Davis-He was waiting for gentleman:
heard afterwards it was his brother; Mr. Cutter
was there's he spoke to MIR. Robson, the proprietor
OF the hotel.
TESTIMONY OF AMOS J. CUMMINGS.
Amos J. Cummings examined-I reside at ia
Uoctc Oft tpa NJ Inn
was in the employ Of the tribune; left il in fall Or
1885, in November was there before that 1859;
correspondent and wrote reports Of oals and FASH
ions. Letter here shown> This IS in the handwriting
other letter letter snown Ths is In the same hand.
writing. IA third letter shCwn.) This is in the same
Counsel -Thsy are all one letter, these various
, sheets.
Here other letters shown, which the witness iden-
| tilted a. in Mrs. Calhoun's handwriting.
To counsel-I know Mr.. Richardson's handwriting
there the letter identified BY Elisha sinclair idensi.
fed as the handwriting OF Richardson).
Tnis letter was then read ana put In evidence:
THE SENSATION NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. TO MRS.
MfAHlANp mArcus.4sopx
two hour: mrs asrns q O E =
sssd @ ia @ 3 ~ hoping YOU may gel
p: s
outraged mine great deal worse than
al tue o. 0o' '"a
have my se patient, little girl, and you shall have
only confirms theory that YOU and Nellie are nrst class
the new
to
that hat. sye horrors
Darling smiled ed a. tn S SePF pnng and hqr .s Wy am
% se sS a. e.
sso & before y'n
trouble .sss .ls ihoash could not let
her, Eve viii make no vows to love always;
:Ss replied Sssas sS sas r. # but
5 i,s have aSthRs 11s
wond have made no difference there That scene was
Will viii IKE s1s ss sa ~s' 4 ds.sE
snS ssis
The .c sd oo q rsn. sls
Grundys win neglect WORK 70 come, but Il is quite @
Rss'i's been xsas say CARING sssas
S to S yoS nv o ssss
night and the few months before you {
ao Ss %ns %s public non
sn say s 81 VIII
the samne, Just soon as daring can props
s sy s09saS %s
rs greg e NJ 1 os y ass ss
ali time Only love ever grew so closely Into my
|
Heaven needed and took it, Ny darlns yon are all would
have you exactly what would have you in mind body and
estate; and my finds you Infinite rest and
| riches sweetness Good night, my love, my own, my
| wife.
Burn this Will you noty
TThe letter is postmarked Hartford, Conn.,. March
| 90 and addressed Mrs Mcfarland care Samuel
Sinclair Tribune office New York CITY," On the
back Is the monogram "A. ID. R"1
O, Is that line, "burn this, won't your" which
you will IN pencil, IN the same handwriting as
| the body of the letter. A. think II Is.
| Deep sensation was created In court by the read
! Ing OF the letter.
rms closed the case for the day and the court ad-
| ourned till Monday at eleven A. NJ, the jury receiv.
ing The usual caution not 10 converse IN relation TO
| the trial.