The sun., 1870-12-08
nom which Fidridss arguc, ths, be mast have teen
Influenced Oy improper motives.
NOT ONE WORN OF plcr

nom which Eldridgs argscs that he mast have teen
Influenced Vy improper mouves
NOT ONE woED or pAor
s given having any bearing upon Ry influence Of aay
ants nor OF aay er rare intarviews or them or their
SS's S" a TO saI f SioSs wSsa
Ss'S Se nrcpcty r q ak 5 na 's 4 over VITA "a.
aud satisfied myse thlt lac would decide IN my favor
osyns Sf s sa One sdce s4 . 9 S9
NaIc ntertlcw with the referee on the sDact Il t,e
mlltel Lad private COMPENSATION with him ana en-.
S 1r 70 warp @ h2 mni TO NY purpose PROM tnat
rge.naen, "a n, once and ia mus. Ts secretly &c "
hcthis mind favoraOy 10 my cause. /
DmpeD MN wirH LOAN OF MONEY
5S% 70 SfSpS be N .S my yG re, 5ssq Goscn mat n
oul, because was sur Il woWid copr , " ont
q, OF ihe oue side, and wished by nv acaucsc 'ncc
he sAouid decide for M ana now mae h9 h,. dec
af'inst me an confident ina sine nv st'cnricd
ne amieed T Em s ab.uFi tnS G ss ise a,g, 9p'5
H. sappsr,nt upon th, plantn, own panors. Let ne I.
cr-'hc late honorcd hicf 5lsicc Of mis- CaHf"ani
f9r ~ d.fcndagt aud the Jury bling 10 vefliot ioi
dciendant; ana imagine
mn. o'CoSOa MOVING FoR 4 NEW TRIAL
on the grounas Of u1tus nnucnc, exercised over me
hefoIe rns lnal conirencrd tssed viii one of tSi
rsndr ysrct G nv SaS 70 burSs bTHRSsg ~ sG, he YOU'D
the trial talked with another IoFor aud lc said ne
was c.oscd apt Counsel tid summed ur. GOT sccrSt
scces 70 ne Jniy In the Jpry toon lent ole II them
tlM bcaird auoiner 70 drlns tai.cl an argued
with another, and smother. and another "a they all
my cause. Aud nov u,At they have decided against
e; 10 asa 'nn y ss sSsrasp shoaSS s, ns sIy9 9 aE
the Chief justice have said 70 tkstp ''1' "''''
rus nErEREE's DrrExcE.
me sS, rna .w OF MI Dooite read for
Frt-T',-t Mr. Doolitue had constant social inter.
FAVF vii
Second ,Ln.. Ne was i9dlscree, enough. meaning no
dfdse lie aaseSee OF lie other % soSs,e s VITA h' ~
IhlTdIlhat we loan had nothing 70 DO with this
Fourth That % one time he did intend to decide for
ths PlainIln and 30 informed Mr.; Eldslise.
wa az item n thH dyfendants account when appeared
papnG sts.emsat nat n. ssisSce 20 wss SSa s9oo s
Snd l ,h'. they 80 Aimted 20 hln snd entrely con-
several thoutnnd dollars less fhs item was seerc. y
popiei os. V the referee BY Eldrldge. and The de.
.eio.er e3lnirA i2a OF the easi tile referee himseif
Sss Sonns mat a. ne 10 aT 5S TgY ~ ITEM beng rags
nom vtrr the vori thirteen Instead Of tS,r,y tnat
an tt2ofo, tnat MS statement GU thlt intlctt was
untrue and tc Defendants truthful Thls vas Tho
EEY TO THE wHoLH cAsE.
There a conflict OF evidence two agsirrt one
TIE one had what was either false s;stsmsnt o.
gittint rrror. There was no.hlng {, impcgca ihc
Vnder &c rais Of he cosT r. that d 'o' ot exam
ine he case u on ~ meT Z. not necessary icr re
OF The was the sde n the deftndt1s. Il woui
:Ste! ss 1e niant, 'e to ne s,ea.s Of uSw ta
simply because
Mr.. LLDEiDGg mas TRIED TO rAMrER wfru ruK
REPgHEB
ana failed The referee svelrs positively that he never
go huv tiue had any cOnyrleatCn or cOrrast1nl acs
whatever win tue dcfsndtns, or wth aay At lgnry Or
counsel VI theits OF with anyDady ttcr htnlf *
cept IA t" pr-.ence of te opposite party AID ever
received any bvn-at or advantage rom the or any of
them. lie has pc N foIlcNAN ildisctcct IA taking
with man whom he be icved & be hi- lend aud who
Wae Geek NJ to urCO hlu .ud Tor mat f4eul now 10
MAKE This outra sepu- att,cs uLo1 him - make the
fod suspicious on foul nliud ior destroyug
H. character. Il SIMPLY mfimO
The Court took the repers, reservlng It's decision
Of the motion.