New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-04-13
THE COURTS.


OF State, Is indeotea 20 hin ~ tne s.ul er -.
ST. 900, exclusive or lhteresLs anu Cos.S; iUi
this, TO VIII: Inat Oh oa.uIuay iao'' t;.;an. ~
instant, SAID deiendant soiu " amr peu'.O1or 1or
forged warrants on .ne U'aSo ~
the payment OF ol44 900 oA, ~ Guo ~ ~ a,,U,
count ui whlch Petitio4ei paiu LIN Nv 80
OF S1l,OoO; all OF WhlCA WV appea. ta ~
erence 10 saio I&lse anu ioi Stota
now III the nahos Vi vAn!ea " "a h1, riro
ana "n'cH AIe WI siaoo,.l,..d ha had
Inat wien peutionen au ulsotss C't va snHount
oeoH oue"'su S.nd oLS- ", ~ -,h,air resti,u
OF money, ne enoeavored 10 oo.aan iI9,i'I L,t u
lon thefeof ny every ieeal eApeareu., ,,t 80 hia
valn. oald "ichiillt' "a oaii yin5 n,;n..
Iraauulcn! oeslBus anu Pun P1oes' ,.a.;n,I
becrsttu Aihstn ii -.o oluo. W 80 ,nr,t ~ at,
tba1 Hioer tueso cltc9lns. .ar;.' S,u oo
shchueut asa4iSl .ta pp,a5 for
heretolore eran.ea! - 'Ic IVY -oANe'' ava
UnT pio.ee .,on " A.H 80 ,1t'+ht hafore ,as+
~ diHeals sii" hs go - ~ 60 10 not;tion
S' oeiJl ,,i,a5 ~ and ob,ainea rom A. J.
nc -, @ Aou "Spi" ESp.tr W; ~ ohsanco ~ Jndoa
", aghtr' Cietn H,n ~ n;'t.iot Govt toE
Ihestul VI t VIZ 1.h;nb nos issued and
WIZ VI "'.ac hS, vs. ~ Cha~;G r, 10
+ 20 ,,Serstnod tbat ahnnt St5 600. in the hands
unaerstoou tn"' SooaI 80 sa1'ouJ, ched Il. beran
oi b 'h'Iu pA''J' A"'. W.
Kaghsa Dis'Fac'
@nAlro"o
ne case VI r. o. hAoooiIo ;, So 0.ioo-,.
Jackson railroad, the city OF New orleans
Intervening, was resumed yestetoay, 'uuSe
Campbeli, OF counsel 1or tne railroad, on d
question raised TO the court, afeueo .!iss' 'ue 1
city OF New Orleans h&d Dot suoscrlDeu w
the stock OF the road as All ordinary persoh;
1t had nov suDscIlpeQ IL iloioy, ~ n"o
pledged the stock taken Dy IT, tor Inc re.
demptlon OF the Dohos, anu tnc etoo s",'1l Houto
not be transferred except tnIousn eHe.oi sc. SC
Ient by the corporate au'noii''es Vi 'u0
citv-
Mr. Bermuda or counsei LOT the ralIrosu "a u
company, fed D!is OF exception 10 sAe
consututlonalty UI iae court Inc Juuse
ordered that the exceptions 50 Iar as
related to the or@ahlzauon .! 'ne ,i coui' :,
should be strlcken out; anu :" 'Ais Iu.iA+
Nj. BermudeZ reeetFen e4ceH'iob7.
General joan ~ hFee1lal' "a oooAson, sol,
Mississippi, was INTRO 1uceG: ana Dy courVess J
OF the court, was aAto"eo ~ appeai as "1
counsel TOR ). w. LthSuanl' VI Eu5ia iot -
whom ne nleo an lhlelSe-''of'' at,eo ,his ,his
the ILtereelor Is o"AeI VI e9ooA ~ sua
road, and that the assumed saie 70 hicCoiuo
was fraudulent ana III FoAa'loi1 VI Lac
rights. ,.-.:;..s
General freeman, VINO - alsVlh uisneo
Democratic politiciah' anu ioIheiiy ~ 49,, hSon
ney General OF mississippi mas aieo 80 u
retained as coUhset Ior 1he 0lfec'oi7 VI Use
road.
Que OF the poiuts ~ zoe Plei.alug' :, INA
the JACKSON halroao COMPANY was 'M1t.Gi -:
ed by the states OF LoulsLaha anu nl's-9'
slppl, ana that TIE ChsIteI taG ~ Ao' w {,
Peaied CT chauSed With0u' Tue e1HTth; VI
the legislatures OF HotN o'"'es' WILL" las
| not oeen Obtained. c,,..,
The couhsei lor hcOolno hieu sllnlial e4-
ceptions to TINS lnterVentlon as were maoe
| to the intervention On the pat U 1He ClIS
| Of New orleans.
Evidence or the eaie oy mayor Gon"ay u
| McComo, OF the e;gnN tnousahu shsrss VI
| the city, STOCK II III: foaa was prooUceu.
The rule taken on hcGoihp Ior cobteWp'
OF court wa Qishlisseu, Ny ouuse D1oo''
deciding that there was no contempt.
| The case will be resumed to-day:
John Ochlgle7lch and !" "llllam t; HeAly vs.
| Mobile and Chattanooga halroau'-lE thlS
| case p'alntti sliege that they are occdpah,s
! and owners OF property on refers street
| formerly known as front LeV1e street
! that defendants, by virtue OF certain acts o.
the Legislature, Incorporating tlein as
company, propose to construct o raliroaC
| along the leVee from Glrod TO SPAN street
! that if said road Is constructed IL VIII ue
| prive petitioners OF the use OF the laAaloG
N front OF their placos OF business. OlVt
| away all trade, and maze the adJacen
property comparatively OF Htt!e value
that the grant by the Leelslsture u
the defendants OF tie rlght of way sloDE
! the proposed line q falf0ad IS nui
and VOID, as 1t con1lc!s Win tht
Constitution of the United States and OF the
State OF L0uisiaua. Petitioners allege that
by the grant OF the railroad privileges to
defendants. their rlght4 ana tLe Iighls U
, the Inhabitants OF Louislana, ana IAe C!ti
zens of the other States OF 1de Union are IN
vaded, they beng thereby oosructeu 10 Vhe
Tree Navigation OF the Elesis'lppi tNet
Plaintiffs asked az Injunction restraining
defendants from building sld ra'iroao OF
from in any way obstructIDg the leVee IL
front of Peters street, pesWeeu St' Anne anC
Esp.anlde streets.
On the above showing Jtuee bIoole ls'
sued an order that defendants snow Cause,
on Thursday, the fourteenth instant Wny
an lriunctlon should not ISSUE C4arh,
Bayne Il Ranshaw, OF counsel
City OF New Orleans vs.. Ihoma5 L. MAX
well, Sheriff. In tins case, heretofore re,
ported, in which the Sheriff IS euJoineo
froTa selling under execution any propeTtS
belonging 70 the clty OF new ofleans, Iol
the aege ie"soI thHs tneA0 an az .I.'
.asE Leg 1"tuAe loI o,u r.o@e
Iessrs' to'tVn hcV5, iahnsor '1so
Mou!l', as 1 aS,ot ,a,'n- IIt ~ 80 Stv ~.
VINO IL J1SneHa Ieu,'oi -, I.-v IN N,
Vne clty ot No" oieAIs , go 10 90 ininurtiof
laS l;+ ahii W Ia dismisc4d Tht
sSnoStin, soU bav;rq hem bronrht IN the Sixth
District Court, this court is without juris
diction, rat!one nlote'7oe ana any tAecusi1, .,
tSsuei ,I ~ tIT t.; T,'bi wbicb me cause onrnated