, 1870-11-22
THE LAW COURTS,
! Railroads nnd Elevators,
A Would-be Suicide Sues for Breach
of Promise.

| - ..-
A WoulH.be suicide Sues for Breach
|
.
| eup1eme Court
| zuz w4.xuouss srs,nrss-ax4nouxssr or i
49,. q, .cn,,. . norsnae..,n e1us R.,,.,, co,,.n,
| Tno CnlcsSo NORTHWESTERN hsn"Ay company
=. The People, esa. ex rel Edrard Hcmpstead.
Judgement Of The Superior Court. Awnrtinz . ncr-
smr,ou vTtt ~ n,.ndsmns rs,,,,tna 49, = ps,
liant 70 receive u any Of the stations on tn tines
Of railroads grain ia bulk couu1ned 70 appellces
Alternative witt having tssued rom the Snnrrinr
ess11,, oos, A9pesns as ae@oed The demurrer VA
ovesuled and resasH made TO the witt, where
upon The perempsoUf5Its iasued upon 4 iudR.
the Gout & ofgsnixed nndcr ;he eons,Fnton m
!s4s. but the Court ordered res1s1ment before r.
ads ,! ssats = II
Water ttfeet, between Waaalngton ami Mas,sSn
The IIil1o;s RIver Ef.vs,nr Fl s-haS AooNn -
iorr AucuSt. issS. md nsea "tnea =. sece1 oe-
for the Seception, storing. and shinninr a1 HT.1
Ear rrcevinr nn5o.d,nr aa1 sut eSy macnnefy
nj his nl.ce se1stor. 4 ~ E.an. aad
storing and shipping. Tna fespondeu, is carno o.
rnH f1o Ma1 Tornc,, tuS nnTa ~ saines osnng ~.
10 Chicscn mi - rn11,oT H9u .ton oeaes polnts
ana sach has imPosed upon he lexa, das1 10a T.
any stslfon ANA trsnsna44 ~ 1.r.r ~ =,
cssnscneea Tners eI3cn cnn.ena NE, s same 70
+ ~ ais0 ctane sIn ~ ~ ~ ;s S4sll atreeL
Iii pra1D s,a reraira, ~ b bS o1ss 70 denver
ihe Wrreh,nsS ~ {,,,s. ~ uuN into
Il III ia consHnsM sna na,, cn1easo % which
i've, r. sr. n,hs- u .i u 1aAWiol 20 oe-
hmse c1nnnt ~ Iaschs1 ~ an ee1snees III MAse
which snnei,anf ssr mn =. c.rs ~ ~ aSSA on
Of Ia epinnan1 i anthna5s ~ @ ~ ~ me Gnasf
u,trnrt dt3, . AuLauI11Sa 10 c21fy lEe!9nt
reccsret T.t - Ss,p sy 3MI A. ana AwaIs mas
nwned ~ ninet - nrar.ta T innfEaagnGs elsvstoa
icns ma that IL he ,1ws1a 49,, NJ ~ GolPoIs.
Grsr 11.n ~ H. 70 receive and de-
Ctcaso, owned bT persons Or cornorainns nsbne IN
than restors il further sllesed tass 1esooods .
Tn,sh IrsnsT9 y. .s; e0aaGcs sE WIG other ro1ds
and that rnlcT an orilnsace Of ifc M, ~ .deni1
in 1858. Tie piftsbure6. Fnrt Wsrnap arsp'ea
Eh,eaVn' Hsi1v.r 1.nrnss Tua. mAynE q
dn fec 1'1y fn,y1,.Tg ", aao fne Fond
spondent IL The W. saccersnn aSu nc, 1
down track on South Water streef tne pitta pa.
nnifn1 aown th,1 T,1,o,, astt ttsway company
eesnondeSt iatinH H. racs nn lbe and
Of Randolph street. thps m5sinr a a. rnnf3nnn1s 1s
cnn,,,sn1ts Ths e aepot. o. ne respective
has I7ghl to ase i;fnns il front 81 IT, e|rtn-
isSa NnIey 1,s1;,ra ~ nta6to ssa.e9 tnah N
NJ fheif az. e1manee Nc gaas3s q fel1tofs.
mission Of the 11ftstunn rnrf ,.n T.a 1ae per.
man frsrE I.ia ~ ." .t.S vita tue
sTerre that rr,noenf nc msae 10y e. ~, aso
is:ora s1ites fnnnina x IL alssons ,a asea s r.
cred freihht other thsn rrs,n IL hs,e - uGd snn
md % hat er1n eau s es'i - as Is s9s9 ,7
elevator. and Iet sppcsns has rrfnsad ~ ~ otneT
OF 10 receive Era,u il Sulc eonassned uelvss m th,a
elevator, and hss refused to deltycf en ~ s,5 s1s
de1er auc cein to nt1kr aaa aoes n tact
oply ba reached by sFitchea and mn, eaa
IL track The 1utiheF allegations are saat teu the
sIc ths onty oaes Waieh ear 9,.o e thsf homaena 1 u
his elevator. Wherefofe they Fefn4nn - .eas 70
eEs!n 70 su!6 een.kned . i, IL o.aefs arc Dc.
rr.t6. sxrenr a. "a 1s4I1s y. bsEaooaelne1 ior
Whereby tney a. nrest;I tetnPs qs rsn d of Gana
Il BUSH ess ard consequently sains "a and p psoass.
nnIs AZ 10 ~ tnts ne railway company
otnc, and asalnsr ;hta $1,000 70 laEor o.
On ne pat q the appellant 1t WAS areaed that
So.nu. !ssa.o9 t, 70 ss1s tae Nnt OF R'an-
es ahi % sas tnn1 as{ea e 70 ~1sa ha oss sse "a
mnT, no@ oTihE aone, tnefe "a no adequate rem
VIA nat s1ch ~ eHs iass vas eontenIed there
ms1dea n and not every legal right woula authorize
eas taS VIII 70 sae. Gecaasc tn majority of cases
dies The issuing of 1le Wit dencns an = ~ se. ~.
1eSt 70 be attained By the witt. Where the rem
F9y 19ss IeseItea 70 for tue purpose Of forcing
Issinr d S,a tae .9 lson interested must BE- the
n this case It muat be considered as taxing ihe
lms 1see ~ u NJ aGon a. aw. u which the telators
fuc ~ "henousemen, and ark the remedy
pr 1helr pItynte benefit They state that II
= court viii compel, then their business a.
| ngehGusemen ngeh wiM be increased: they simply
tsfd mat commodity carried may uulef ccr--
nSlfC1mst2nce8 be brought to their Tarabonsn
MAEre they may derive profit But they have m
| ais1nY pound Of storage from q shipper. They
to tne1gaI.an,e nc 5aIoaa COMPANY refuses 70 bring
Iase, hts the elevator owner the riohf IL In
n1., ae. tween The shipper and the COMPANY.
th.re = At these must make contract1 II
# is light II lies in the shipper, aud
max, MaSe such aangementa ~ ihey pIcase. and ,he
Is y, men ennot interfere. Can mandRnus
ttstt - eSuPa SailroRd COMPANY To ceaaa Dro1,.
~ ~Ga1DR @ta sniPets AZ to the manner IN ThtrS Il
saaiI calFy and 4nyer freight which the ahinners
de11fe 70 nave st9pod7 - -''fa'-Ao
i. G eG1.actmnies tyas argued that no leRal dutv
| ID huu&u. Inc feAondent Ia A cnrnmor rarrjaf
pound 70 receive gIJn. n1crchsndi7e atr NM -
bound % receive u upon enT special oeo eons
t.sct7 4 may ma5e peciai conttasts. but the
Courf nAa never held kt ii n1nst msts.hs W
ia amply bound to aea d apesial Go1'sacts
SSe;s sns q S'usnsss INST
Of business Hers he WIN 1e lte nsual COURSE
pany had done otherwtas III 81 st,a tnat M re con-
tor tne bencut OF any pef1on,iud tfe law IL that
AeG enaN 40 Tor all ind1 d1defcliv ." ~'"'
pany ID common carrier per aa @ saas tos Con-
10 ifMlt iU oxn liability exceptiE ~ -" raet,ta
consent Of the party thereby ai1ssta sa0 tspnar.
deaiGunted. becanse # IA ni;aged ~ ~ Snagnees =