The morning star and Catholic messenger. [volume] (New Orleans [La.]) 1868-1881, 1870-07-17

,4Ae11 nAmee have not come % prominently BIO
Ase which . make the tanal ssisotion. On.
q theee.-D1. GrifMn-ie IN 1riahmaD, tsco arr
1ngNshmen, bat "No Irish need apply" seeml
= naxs nssn sae principle upon which the
Smith's schools Arc strictly sectarian establish
DonSA whtch by their rules practically exclude
Catholios nom their bene6ts, their internal ar
bat &c 4riebuaen We protest against the manner
In which 4fishnien havc been treated on this
oocaeion- The committee have, by this ap
tsshing taIsns # D saI npe nd so 9,
ta9whoie country. This Is more than q 'sen
1anental gievance Fit is an affront-an in
s s offered 70 iytshp 1. BY lrishmen, and fol
1axkAhle fact that every one of the gentlemen
Who oAaeed this insult to their country is o
Iou and we are glad to know that not Q
Tory vote Of no Irish need apply" We hope
those gentlemen are proud Of their achieve
ment, and proud OF the pecuniary loss and
educated. hard-working and ill-requited body
OF Irish gentlemen, and through them on the
eatire country. a
Another fact In connection with this matter,
which we notice with come humiliation, is that
. Dublin newspaper was found to countenance
and actually to advocate this insult to Irish
mon. ~ 10 true That the Journal We refer to
80 Sns 70 nf rIs It's want Of even
no SPpS:sssnce Q. p1incip,e: put the fact is
a1.ainAnng neverSneiess. Five weeks ago it
haA On article on the appointment in which it
TcIy.S,ss o r. naae . sno sment OF an
Isood pre-eminense Of being the only Irish
11:oWsPsPos 70 revive tne almost exploded Eng
1 s.n - .hatua.; sn f;e e appiy and intro
ssSs,., - ~ VIC fst ~ ~ 10Y patrons. Our
- sorpo.sry, .ossovIn, wisnes 10 put the mat
x -. on Psoper 0asis' ana with its usual eccen-
S.0.sy cnoervom 20 snow mat the appoint
49, ons ~ an tEngnsnman 20 an Irish post, over
me s, nsaGs on competent iT,shmen, was perfect
" Jus! and proper. The Tory members Of the
Ccmmltsee adopteG the congenial sngges-
.s0ns . nostMxiInsSanaing mat we sought to
1etion involved IN the recommendation
g our cotemporary: One act more was required
x.s 10y .ne ,oS , .. 1ne Journal to which we
H..;n, eS cnasac.erstlc and complete.
E Iue .ac e1 oI an 1asnman, ana having thus
3ncsca inc COMMITTEES to ignore the claims of
1nstarSa Ill w1sl onaraoteristlo baseness it
yeocoausy tu1neo upon tnose who had fOOlishly
:.cooP.eu ne Suggestion, That an !rishman was
1noomReteht 20 nj tho ONCE. Having got the
- anTc tnls Ialee position, it left them
et noPe3 " revihng, ana being itself the
l Lss " sssHc1 tnom, 70 conceal the fact that it
ns0 Dcen tncr inetigator and accomplish all
sre not the dssneuisSinr SO
Axnn nesaorahtys-fsee"ca
THE PoIxrIcAL PR1soNHRs.-What ia the obl
5sct Of thu. oommiasion to inquire into the
treatment of the Irish Political Prisoners IN
E1glish Jailsf We know only one--to ascer-
tain the truth or falsehood OF the complaint.
Of the prisoners, that they, were eubtacf t.
harsh aud cruel treatment by prison officials.
Whatever Englishmen may think Of the acts
for which the prisoners were punished. thew
would not Approve of any Oppressive treat
enough without aggravatinR it by pettv and
tyranny. It was tacitlv Admitted
by the Government that the official reuorts
about O,Donoyan Roeaa were nntrna ons
-aouSn ~: DfIce 9id not say as much, he |
a W. 1s.S .eIs t1eg ne was misinfornied about |
Suo cOnoaucn OF hicnard Burke. 1t may be |
- snss somo os tno aocusations were unfounded,
49, t1oIo can De ntsie 0ouoS That the prisoners
49, Deen treated with undue severity, and |
-. tno prisom anthor1sies drew no distinction
IN ..,.s nno on.oEcemeng OF oiecipline between |
Ss9H s.oas P1.soaeIs. VINO snonid be treated very
SSaGsMnty snu sMnlected 20 dinerent rules and !
3sl na.uEes Inc tfish people believe that q
~ 4s ao1ung nas peen a. the bottom of
- ,sSt Mno thaS sne state connived at
S. ICY VI Ine suDordlnates. It has been |
s4 ~ snss my severity was practised and to
~ :. snS mssser ~ rest the Government consent
szs :. - sssuS miss.9n OF inquiry presided
TroceSnrs ,Ua. ~ r oa nlgn cnnracter. II the
sconstifnt;or 20 al eo lou ooJeStion as the
ssa ;ncr;,. VI tne SoHmission' the object OF |
SoyIg Ia ~ t1e reverse or satisfactory. The |
1;ttSe ya4x., III Wy tne commissioners are
1 sssxo So.soL yI mockery. IL 10 impossible
S..:s snc HuyNc sn9uia pc satlsned with an in |
10Y wnl 10 "a, sxcluded the friends OF the
s, ~ OF GIG noe allow them to take part
prisoners, whose evidence of course. would he
of the last Importance on the main point Of the |
inquiry. 1t may be the releaaed prisoner ars
not unbiased witnesses. Perhaps having ant |