, 1870-01-26
THE COURTS.
Alleged SwfndlfnE by II Guar
dian.--Allcgcd Seduction.
Perjurers, Robbers, Etc, Sentenced to
Long Periods Of Confinement,
Police Court Proceedings.
G1cuit Court

A1ICWE CouIL
ALLEGED sWNpllS0 ri 4 0UAzptAx.
Theron s. Norton :. Frederick 1ntue and
Charles u. FAEKelL Bill to declare trust Con-
plaloAnt a>er1 that hls father, Theron Morton,
died intestate on the s4:h day OF April,
1s4, leaving h!uteH and others.-stster,
hrc,acs, and ,nosncr,-hls hetss u hw.
he, II the time. being years Of age. Tne de-
ceased 1efs regfonal property sufficient 10
hQu'da1o htA debn md real estate, Lot 10, Moak
.. FeTt Dearborn Addition, also Lot 80, B!ock 8,
samc addition, and = written con.rac. for the
conrcsanee Of Lo: II, Block Is, Of the;eame addi-
1:on. which. IT. testns being complied with, ulsi-
matelJ natured Into deed to tho mother OF
comp:a!nan1, a Administrative. In August ISIS,
the widow remarked, the defendant Tatkle being
The husband. In tn1s way. IN 1856, te became the
sssrrsd. be receised iarxe suns oi money bota.of
eo-he.ss died il Msscs. 1856, Tassse pse.'saed
Eos % s. SecS 6e ofa ads'en " es ~ tas
Eupnost add education Of The wa1da The
qsasr Sso, ~ maSs; s;,s aud u slleEsa Fsa
sureties Of Frederick, purchased and rece!ed =
deed. a. II alleged. ii secre1 sErss for the defend
ant Tu IT, a,d o. sa's 1 Ky ! .ass
eumpuvc, lis1rg IN the family Of her stepfather,
was Induced TO 61eu qust-caim deed Of hertntcr-
os 10 ~ s ersF Ta ~
n'atuant states That he ato lired in the family,
and thai, on the 18th OF J1tY, 1880, While he was
IN state Of lntox.caion. he WAS Induced 10 coz
and Lot II, Block II for the expressed consdera-
lion OF i0,ooo-a ntatoua hnm-for 1t ia alleged
Dpnc OF the consideration aums were paid, and
the receipts slnco from the properties thus obtain
ed are Estimated at a1 least f14o, ooa: By sabse.
guent eonSe5Rnces the tile to Lot II cane to- Far
well, SID thus the defendants ATE rested in laE.
II pfa1 ed TO declare sr1tst and that upon pay
lent OF All 6una 1o1 hun and the co-heif expead-
cd a Ie-conreJance may be dccrecd.
ALLEGED SEDUCTION.
Dcr.hA S{rtng :. Charles G. Schwsrz This Is
an acton of caGc conmc0ccd some time Rxo, bat
withheld from publication to enable service Of
process The proceeding W1s commenced BY ca-
7aas snd the declaIa1on 70 now 9led- II appears
BY the an1daFts Of the plalutl0 that abe bee aIne
acquainted with defendant atout the last OF Au-
gust, 1851, and TINT bbo0t week thereafter he
prnpote1 to marry her,-a proposition which abe
accepteI, the date for the ceremony being Axed
it Ii a~oru, tue deiendRut persuaded bis then In
tended alfe to submit 10 his embraces, he relief
Asspg his agreement to Eaafr5. Subsequently, de-
fertaE1, 1t Ia alleged, deferred the date OF the
preceding which, aud IN consideration o1 tho new
promise. he again prefalled upon her to grant
him MARTA! privileges. Again he refused 10 marry
until the Christmas DAY Of 1858 should cone, aud
by tnls time she 1s1 in prospect Of becoming a
Eother. when he utterly refused to redeem MS
promise, aId. IN violation Of It, married WOMAN
GaMe1 Meizrer. For the breach OF promise and
The uespasses madc upder 1t, $to0oo are de.
MAndsd.
xkr srtTa
Gustav Fischer '. John r Leslie, Thor1aa Fer
t!ef, solomon +. Dewey, L. 3. Miller, John u.
Carpenter. and clark L'pc Debt Damages iald
F1easr1cs r. Herman '. George Il Hess and
Charles 6.a51ett- A6suDpalt. Demand, $1,000.
EuAuer 4 Brother :. Home 1uEnfRnce COMPANY,
# Chicsg0. Demand, $500.