The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-04-07

uol, tGrcater scniaton, and exclamatons by INC
Looking an1iously around the room, Mr. Graham
exclaimed. +" Where Is my fourth Of WeudelT
Judge pAvts-lgucs you must have swallowed IL.
The book was handed 10 MIR. Graham, who alter
readinR pIssaPe. continued;
may ye, 10 w1s 20 Sccsp' this juror but We
HB TURNS OUT AN gP1scoPALiAs.
Amer some further remarks by Mr.. Graham ana the
distinction between absolute and hypothetical opin-
ions, referred to In tie text he had Jus, read, MT.
speDcer irterposed challenge to the hvor, and In
terroEatod the juror as follows;
.o,.Mr. Trowbridse. have you . wife and ohlldren3
S-RWIhssGf S Sh sisSR2 eG %HFhs Epi.sop,
as ju,oT II Ihs case You can give 70 NJ McFarandS
pe5iset, fHr aud ms fbs cnasnss 20
and accept the juror.
Tho prosecution making no objection, Mr.. Trow-
bridge was sworn In as
the NINTH JUROR.
Tho next six Jurors who answered to their names
were set aside one after anotl er, because they had
every one formed opinions which IL would be din
cult to overIurn. The jury business began to grow
son, who was under examination as to whether he
could Try tile cause impartially, as Q Juror should,
WALKED SNAKES
by suddenly turning to the Court and saying:
Judge, before can sec my way clear IN this eusi.
the part Of MTs MeFsriaad should 90 proved could
no The Sfcs Suhr ysfSfs he question
Mr. GRAHiS tiroS, NJ. seat,-rba, /, not even one Of
the strong points In our defence. We shall
STUN Tus PEOPLE.
Those who expect that the adultery referred toby tho
S,N ssa W. 9N a TTSGr 5y sSS % n
bers of this community Jungle and burn In their veins
AN HONEST FRESHMAN on rHs STAND.
Mr. Thompson not being able to have hs mind
cleared up on the question which belonged hin,
and % vas set aside. Five others speedily followed
Mr. Thompson TO private lie. and then came Pat
looking fellow, who franklv said he had a leaning
TO the side OF MIR Mcfarland.
Tux DISTRICT ATroESEy-Have You any conscien:
sSfiy in q case where the penalty IS .deat6P a
should not have any other case, but In this case
shou d. US II would be too bad 10
HANG GENTLEMAN
for shooting who had needed with his wife.
tLaughter.l
MIR. Derby was excused from serving as juror In
hr. Netherlands case. and so were four other iu-
practicable citizens. Then came William Harvey n
liquor dealer, who seemed intel isent and flirnind-
ed. and parsed q brilliant examination. But Mr..
Hanev's career juror was cut short by
peremp,ory challenge rom tho prosecution, after a
long and anxious consultation beLwee judges Car
Win and Davis, who had but one peremptory ehal-
lense len.
EVERY FRESHMAN CHALLENGED.
Mr.. srrScrG Cnutterng In his seatl--They chal.
| lenge every lrishman that comes. It's judge DAVIS
| that doe it. lie was o bitter Know-Nothing.
JOIN D. Mol, Franklin Goodwin; and William Q.
win MAS sent rom tie stand, Mr.. Spencer gave
| another growl, saving:
| that went Tor
| HANGING JoBSNY AusrTy
and you kept the jury out three days. We know
| homas Mills, who keeps a dry goods store at 13s
Bowery, passed an e1ceiient examination, and i'm
pressed counsel on both sides so fayoraos that lie
| was sworn in as
THE TENTH JUROR.
| The neyt four pentlemen who ans vered 70 their
| namss-N lillian 4. Wright. James q. Beknap,
Joseph Frank. and Charles Menck-were set aside on
| the challenge for principal cause. Henry Queripel,
chi dren attend the Methodist Church; he didn't
know Beecher nor rockingham, nor do any OF his
intimate friends attend tho church OF either n tose
| gentlemen: It seemed as though Mr.. Queripel was
suitaiion by tie prisoners counsel. MI spencer
| arose, challenged toe juror pereaptoriy, and he
went aside.
DID rou on pIpS'r TOO, AND WIEN AND WHERE
| Next came Antoine Conan, whose case developed
| novel points, The defence hayinS learned tLat the
| juror had formed an opinion on the ease, Mr. Conan
sss taken in hand b, the District Attorney. ,on,,
G s 1s DfRss 5ds I2R Slg
q ryg He' any evoehee 20 remove thi, In
preston. ~hateysr 1t may De2 AL would decide
1'NT. GrSETgI Understood you 70 cay you had al
OPQ%Xnd ii would require evidence 70 remove Up A
| Yes / would he governed by the evidence -,,.
woui depend upoA Tie testimony Ayes, air. /
poNr Ar1ExD A DIsREPUrABLs CHURCH.
The Court decided the challenge for princpa
cause was not sustained, aud the defendant ehal
lenged to the favor.
Mr. GERRY-Q--Are you married man. A.-No, slr
Q.-&hat church 10 you atIend2 A.-1he Foureent
,et o 's seSua,uted with Mr. rockingham
o.1or Mr.. Beechsrp No. cir.
Q.-Have you ever attended either OF their churches
AL Vac at Beecaei ohufen ear a.I na,i ego
G-Dd you read the papers much about the time {
this uansdetionp A-So. cir. was too busy hadn
| time U bother with It.
, o.-You merely formed your opinion from statement
OF Others hearing the subject discus'edS Ayes
FLOW many conversations did you have n
. | subject A.-rwo-one with nv sister and another
| heard between a couple OF men where bought son
! Q~hfter that did you hear anything Till you came
| Court2 A.-No, arr
SIX TO oSB AND HALF DOZEN TO rHB OTHER.
oFrom yha. You have heard ga you derive "a, az
1pSS1E SSsTi Ss. s 90 remove s that mprs
o-Na. hat Impression adverse 70 Mr.. Mcfarland
!. AL cent sey u was. ,.o,,.s v,,,,, "A wo
Q.rhea Snqt was ths impre sSdS side vi
D Q.-sx OF one AMI half dozen OF the othera A.
"a pNfrom what did you derive that impre.sion7
ne cGgEr. tonr nSsr a.. fsn have Snyhr
May please inc G3TT, s PaeTsa ia ss aa6 ~
/ u
| A FOUL ISLANDER.
II has been rumored that he brutal toward his vii
| and hunted her 4 ON her home, ana compelled her
20 on the stage. Ihs Juror may have read tese stat
o | ments and may thnk that they are true, We III,
e | proye that greater falseho0ds we're never utter
II | AGAINST any man than tins, aud
; | The COURT dnterruptngl-fou may ask tho Que
Mr. GERKY-what was your impression founded mp
| prncifally? A-Upou The point oil marriage, II tile
, | was any IMPRESSION didn't believe zach thing Ia
u | full az being married twice.
r JOHN GRAHAM GETS OFF GOOD THING.
Ia The challenge for favor not oeing sustained, Il
!" prisoners counsel challenged the Juror perempI
e | rily, and he went aside. 20 did Robert Jones; III
70, also, did Herman Unger VINO said he had an Il
Di preston In favor of the prisoner which II would
~ quire evidet ce tO remove.
MIR. GRAHAM lin his seat)-That evidence Meth
> he any other juror will ever have Laughter.
Edward l. HODrook was next called, md 3
nloLg very well until II Gene out that he attend
Vi the {, ngtegati inal Church Of the lev DR.. Jose
IA r. IlUmi son, WhcTeupOn doubts rs to his imp
nj laity arose and II finally became apparent II
u, he was biased that he was set aside.
/ | boN't Know OIL. JOHNSON, But RBADs THE ISL
49, PENDENT,
ne William 4 GRAY, the next juror called exh
ne ined hy Nj. Gerry. under challenge ~ the Ev
- us follows!
y, Q-Are you married man2 Al have wife, /
a 10 .t.. AZ