New-York tribune., 1870-09-21
SUPREME CoURT-CHAMBERs.

Before Judge Ingrahdm-Amelia Josephine
Adedide Croft agt John r. Cr9tn-ln tnis SUIT Win
by the plaintiffs counsel for am0ny ana cOunsel ies
pending the decision Of the Court In suppqrt OF % th9
entered into Counsel on both sides read afihvts h
which plaintiff and defendant charged one another M Wln
mutual neglect and too great intimacy WIN otuef
PepIPe ie Rnipoad 60 asI Heoh-In this suit brought
by English stockholders OF the Erie Company to recover
stock by them and deposited WITH tne 9mces4
the Company by whom they claim M u Is Illegally a hays
the trial Of the cause removed to the United states court
under the Alien laws Of lSs and lSe6 The C2pa hn IN
ants are citizens Of the United states anu tnat thls pr
vents The removal Of the CAUSE I6e turer nearing
Decisions-By Judge Ingraham.-M9tions Granted
MGdelPm Pm,SS "g g Henry DOW as Grswod We'll ag
soms Jewett agt, Lekman; HLdlck agt POnd nulehI
nson agt Hodge, gt sor second Friday Of
Oct0ber) Frank agt. Osborg klaer agt Mensnauset
sde the EVENT. SCHUYLER agt Lilly (motion and decree
granted) Darling agt Griswold 0rder granted); Iau
on both abide the event Bartlett ag Chase zap
In the matter OF the application of the New York Prot
estant Episcopal Public School, 10 yacate assessment;
Protestant Episcopal soGssy M Az Ftrbnh r. 0cSan Sa
tional Bank agt. FAINT. Reports conirmed-Buher agt
More We'll agt. solms
KINGS COUNTY SUPREME COURT-srEcIAL TERM.
James O. Brower agt: Sarah Boerum dnd
BTOOks.-DH
recovered Judgment in the Supreme C0nTt against the
defendant Sarah BOerum, OF $3.50 30 and Issued execu
ton which was returned nud bona. on the 9th day or
March, 1862 and during the pendency Of the action Sarah
Boerum conveyed a house and lot belonging to her on
Gold 10 gter Sarah Brooks the other defend
ant This action brought to set aside THIS convey
ance "a fraudulent. Decision reserved. -
Emiy CdrreRne agt. Ofrer Vdndeudter et dt-Ihls
suit was brought to set aside and declare void the Will or
FreeOye VandeWateT, the mother OF plaintih and Je-
fendant and also to make partitions OF real estate men
tonen I'm the will The will contained the following qe-
wise: First give anu devise unto my executors here
matter named the house and lot unoccuped by me- and
situated the southery side Of Ainsles, to be held or
disposed Of for the benefit Of my Oliver as follows,
viz: They my executors may either hold the SAID mouse
IA a resdence said Oliver they may Ill the
exercise of their discretion sell the same at public or
private sale and convey the same by good and sui-
cent deed and invest he proceeds Of such sale in some
safe manner and pay ana apply tne
interest and income thereof to his support III
such manner as they may think best during
the of his natural life or until the contingency
hereinafter mentioned may occur viz: that he become
capactaed by sober and steady habits to take charge
of the property himself in which event, and II my said
executor shall determine that he has become capaci
tated then authorize and empower them 10 convey 10
NV said son the said and lot to pay and deliver
own use forever. In case my executor shall hold the
aforesaid property at the death OF my said then
them make such distribution OF II he shall
by his last will and testament duly executed The
plaintiff claimed that the above devise only created
fife in Oliver Yandewater and asked for such
sructon and partition The defendant claimed that the
fee became vested in Oliver Judge Tappen suggested
that be made before the General Term,
but subsequently remarked that he would give his
cision in short time, and took the papers.