The New York herald., 1870-04-29

aooo' eoii nm ne hau no iighi 70 pref ore tne
MN o i son agui ~ his M thor even II she we
a Md woman; he said ne tnouehs ne mad ght
TO 40 wn no ma do 9, an sy wh =
agre't ma h, times afer at. b ne, er STAYED Ing;
on nn rs eats a AZ! A ne 10 ut Mr. r. @ nad on ani ~
was; would Sometimes appear exc tod and some
II Q When aid you see him ayalni A. think 1t
was ON the nnrring Of the shooting; dI NJ, sieak
10 Ilm thihk ~ looked Into my room at the 7s-L
o., e,'ns ono soIue one was WITH me; think It was
Q. rtd he eve say ANYTHING about shooting Rich
rr..ons A.. lie told me q different tunes that Mr..
! lichards should never i've with Mrs. McFarand;
! he was determined on that and that II they wire
IN rri - q lhey -ho ~ never I'VE 10 ether
I q Dfd he say anything to You about shooting hfmf
| A. lie said be would shoot him.
q Dil he ever ray anything about the nrst shoot.
I as IN y were coming from the theatre; he talked
also about ne suit mat was going on abons me me
| ana about Percy going 10 school,
| The court took q recess OF thirty minutes.
After Recess.
| CONTINUATION OF MR. sIN0LAiRs TESTIMONY
M Sine air again took the stand and Cest fed -
! ! found Mr. Mcfarland very much intoxicated |;
| his face was bleeding; tried To quiet him and
half TO three quarters OF an hour; this was four or
five weeks previous to the birth Of his second child;
do nt remember & mat os s c, phy pnn on Hnea ss my
dined iry In the days the company at the Int view
were Oliver Johnson, Mr.; Sage. Mrs. Mcfarland and
Mrs Johnson Mcfarland was expected on that occa-
sion: cannot say that the thing WAS cut and dried
| what was 10 lie said and done on that OCCASION.
said A. No, Itiink not.
O. Wa, II roi ar, anged what Mrs. Mcfarland was
to say 10 her husband at tina. interviews A. never
h ard Of IT, di not see Mr., Richardson on that day;
very likely Imiyht have said to Mcfarland, "Bear up
k rn% man W a va. SosI knew what was 10 ,ranpre
you still proiessed to he his frendf A. / was the
O. There was q right and q wrong in this matter;
| I'D you not form Judgment who was right and who
wa wrcng' A. My Impression was that both were
viii viii yos y sta from your knowledge OF what oc-
cured that Mr.. and brs johnson were ayerse 10 the
sion is that they Ia soon; MIR. sage MS. MtFar-
Ia d's father. said 70 McFar ana mat ne wa was ms
friend and thay wen, out @ 5qseaner ana '' Mr.
| s. Did you MOI Know that Mr.. Mcfarland came
TO tina inteNieW bat nigD noI WIN desire 70 have
separation, hut to arrange the terms oil her return
8. Ac ordins to your lest recoli ctton did not
Mr. Mcfarland expect to get back mis- vile that
! nights A. don'i know that.
4. DID ne mo- show by his acts and conversation
that nlgnt th he expected his wife 10 return with
hms 4. No. I DON'T think lie did.
| e. VIA part OF the interview can you recollect
tat ne svinc q re snng OF ao.D. s,at mere w0od
| he enterta ned doubt as 10 What the result would
| thou hit that although McFar land came to That
meet ng with the in ention OF getting his wife back
with sincere submit sion tie separation II his VIC
from hins A. think lie was sincere whel
| NIX he bowed 10 TIE de'errnnaiiaa Of his
wife 10 separate; lie said he would never live with
her agaln; thought he was sincere IN saving taa
| from him from desire not 10 appear too much hu
miliatads A. That cannot say; he recognized il at
| had any conversation with Mrs McFarand bout the
matter; did net tell her that / thought Mcfarland
| took it a. q final separation; think that u iaher
ana mother should pnt up with anything before 4
sepuaton did say 10 Mrs. Mcfarland that respect
Iof herself aneciion for Ter children and regard for
\ l,
@. Suppose in mans Judgment that his wife
had made an unconditional surrender of her ell TO u
paramount, would yOn not consider It unnatural in
him 10 perlnit tat man The paramoai W visit Ills
childreB' A. IsappOse 20.
at ihat time there were inproprioes between Rich
ardson and his wiet A. / don't recollect that he
! o. Tie intercepted letter OF the 9th March, when
did you n st see IL A. Two or three days after it
@. Did you sill entertain ffieudly relations with
| Richardson after thstf A. Yes,
Q. You ala not see anything wrong in that letter.
A. saw IL was an imprudent, foolish etier.
q. Do you simply apply the term foolish to tf A.
| l said InpIudent ais0.
measure or the iniquiry OF that leter-do ycu not
think IN letter perfectly infamous % under ihe CIR
Q. is that all yon. have to say about ,ts A. That
O. You think that the receipt OF that letter should
not frenzy McFarlandf A. think is was calculated
| 10 ma se MIN frenz,ed.
Q. Yon were not surprised at his becoming crazy ?
q. Wha3 is the diGerences This is The very thing
on expert-let us have yeur idea OF the difference.
| What il fienzyf A. When man is excessively
| angry lie may be in frenzy.
| Q, When iS a man crazyf a. Wien he Is insane,
| o. ird Mcfarland say to you at any time that 4
ever hts wife and Richardson should marry tney
should never 1--we togetbers A. Yes; he said If they
ever married they should never 1--we together; Rich
arson sau ~ me after the first shooting that II ever
Mrs. Mcfarland was tree 10 marry that he would
| marry her.
q. DId you suggest any impronriety In the pro-
posed mariageY A. No; not 10 Richardson, told
| Mrs. Mcfarland that all her friends thought 1t
strange that she had engaged herself 30 soon after
@ What did she say In reply on that occasion {,
A. She said that once having separated she Thought
she had right 10 marry agan; II was at Lanartine
pace shat cnce saw Mcfarland drink; he was very
much Intoxicated at the time; did cav to Mr.. Nones
that If McFarland had shot Richardson dead ut the
FIRST shooting during his excitemenE, 1t would have
been justdabie homicide, but that now the shooting
Re-direot-It was the Monday after the shooting
| that Mrs. Mcfarland wen 10 Boston.
Re-cross-The Sleeping apartments OF Richardson
| and MIS-. Mcfarland were on the second fo0r; saw
Mrs Mcfarland calessng Richardson.
Testimony of Oliver johnson.
The next witness was Oliver Johnson, who testl
Ned that he was a Journalist; was acquainted with
McFar land since 1861; was present at the interview
between Mcfarland and his Vile at Snelar's house;
| Mrs Mcfarland said she had appointed the inter-
| why she could never i've with him again: she was
beginning TO speax of incidents in their carly mar
ried life when McFar ana said he had to effect
aseiilement and 10 have her 20 home win him; she
referred to lis Ms OF hiemperance, and
! he admitted that on those occasions lie
| had not treated her well: he alluded 10
| the codness OF her letters written from the White
! Mountains, and she SAID You know you have de
sroyed all the lcve In my hearth tue Gay after The
| interview at Snclar's--tne Monday or Tuesday fol-
| owing-McFarand came to the office OF the Ilde-
pendent very bright and CHEEKY, and said TO me, 'Mr
| Johnson never knew what was In me till now;
this Is the grandest thing that ever happened TO me
know II Is utterly hopeless for me 10 expect the
return OF my wife 10 me; know Der so wen that
when she puts Eer feot down she stands there for
ever; give It all up; now shall lead better life
| and make my wife and boys proud Of me-"
| said to him in reply, "Mr. Mcfarland,
your life IN this spirit. Mrs. Mcfarland bad not q
friend in the world that win not be friend 10 You
and VINO VIII not be glad to help you Ia the time to
come. ft
Cross-examined--Neye saw Mr.. Richardson with
| niaf