The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-03-15
PRICE TWO CENTS.
JUDGE FULLERTON'S CASE.
ATTACHMENT ron THE ARREST on
ID. @. BTRDSALL.

| Marshal Murray Again on the s'andLTbe
Di.trtct-Attorney's Confession that he had
| ESh ~ ted the Testimony Tending 20
show n CO.. spiracv.
Tho Fullerton trial was resumed yesterday.
As heretofore the court room vas crowded 10 ep
| GEES, large number ofthe spectators being nom.
bers OF the legal profession. Tbere was consider
able discussion among them befre the opening u
the Court. us to whether the letter OF Belknsp would
DO admitted. or whether the Court would ru,o that
there was not SUFFICIENT evidence to 20 to the Jury
on the question Of conspiracy. The greater number
seemed 10 entertain the latter opinion but the dis
pute was set at rest when Judge Woodruff directed
| the jurors not impanelled to be discharged until
wednesday. Shortly nfterwurd Judge Woodruff
said: The " Court have considered the question
whether the evidence offered I. admissible and are
Of opinion that II a."
Belknsp's letter hereto ore alluded 70, In which no
speaks Of his disappointment In not having Trau.
sanisk the Revenue agent, rcoort directly 10 him
instead OF TO Mr. Tiscv, then read In lie letter
he also envs 4" The control OF these important move
ments, that are to culninse in few days, must BE-
cnnfded 10 one head"
The District Attorney proposed to recall D. O.
Brdsal for the purpose OF proving letter written
by him TO Fullerton, June II 1853. and Mr.. Fuller.
tons reoy and also TO examine him ss to other mat
tiers.
Mr.. Blrdsail not making his appearance whom cali.
cd, an attachment was ia.ued
". Perrepont then offered In evidence the letter
OF A. Rollins to Trau saniski.
Mr.. stourhton made the preliminary obiectloa
ststutes.
knew Relknspi had known him well about wear; On
relation % cos,e plated arrests an not able % .~sss
er n .Hs se bat stsn M r. On s n s.s once es s @
esled e. thank me for having written TO the Presdens
RECOMMENDING MS RESTORATION
y his former position N the navy he ssd he vou5
ss , % Sr sa 70 .Sna s a: :G%s %
Ss h r sSs S e ss ncs. %sS'
ns,cn 10 rsss,d to b, estors, m he said he hsd eSs
part he referred to he said 10 regard to
MAKING xoSEr.
Mr. sto"shton objected to sny testimony In the na-
only ssdsnes se.S sa%i.bre would b
ths, ,et,ina iorth purpose plan ondns 70
M stournton c,.imed that a conv nveration Il plan
Scdy = in :o%. ssy ss no. eSSps,ost @ @ eSiae"e :0
MI PirnrRrosT.The proposition was 70 JON himsnd
NJ sroueaToSe@Hs.ius smithp
sS
the time Of ne conspiracy in rthsTSnce OF The ri N
and general design. vas admissible, though IT nigh, %
y. Court refused TO .dm, the proposed testimony
viiS sm S sSs A. Sa ..%s u%s Has
Mr. Courtney there TO the Presidents II ID
november Fullerton said-(ObJected TO- aud With
drawnD
Ex-coNxIssrosER HARLASp on THE STAND.
Thomas Hpriand. recalled was shown the letter Of
peknap dated Jure % and the letter OF Rollins 10
Trausarst referred 10 In the former letter aaw the
letter of Relk sp on he IN the once ~ the Commits
Rollins tn TrArsansk hut whether dated June fa3,
can't ,ay wss about thai date It In substanc<
about tn same a. the copy ahovH me.
The 'eter referred 10 was again offered In evidence
"a having been sufc entity proved but the Court ruled
Aisert c. Van testified ! reside ip New YorxI su
ac1nalnted with Mr.. Fullerton; him hr.t In Com
missioner nettss ONCE, In Ny June, % knov
Joshua " Baiev saw Fullerton sfterward al his owu
once, No II Pin- street.
Nj, sTsuaaIoS-ls the evidence proposed In refer
Mr.. fIERpIpoNr-It IL, partly.
Mr. stNught"n oNjented on the Tround that the Dts
tnt Atorney had expicity stAte on FRIDAY that all
the evidence as 70 con'nrscy had been exhausted
The Court re used to admit the stimonv.
OF tie absence OF the wncsse- BlrtsAi and Tapley.
VI stHu-hton objected. and. nendng decaion.
cess was taken The motion was renewed when tho
Court decided that must nr't appear what was pro
Mr. Pi'rrepont said thev ey, cc,ed TO rrovc Nv Tan
Tue ORIGINAL CONSPIRACY
before formed In which the whole n'an do
yeopcd. II nrono'ed 10 exaTlNe BrdsAI In rciA
ou to statements made IN himself hv n ituan auhee-
quen' TO the time Il she arrest show from
thS money was divided among those claimed 10 be CO.
The objection. q An sdjrurnm ont was withdr wu bJ
the Cou' sel for he defenre
The case was adjourned until II O'Clock to-day.