The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1870-07-08
company vs. the Commonwealth. Judgment

craven et al. VS.. Miller ct al Judgment reversed
shaner VS. McCioskey. Judgment affirmed.
Thompson ct al. vs. Keyner. Judgment afirmed.
Keyser VS.. Parrish ct al. Decree affirmed and ap-
peal dismissed.
Hart ct al. VS.. Girard Borough Judgment af-
hrmed. Thompson, G. j., dissenting
Metz VS.. Blair county. Judgment reversed.
Knaubs appeal. Decree affirmed.
Cross VS.. Keever ct al. Judgment reversed.
Appeal OF Francis Hayman. Decree affirmed
Dioert et al. vs. Jordan ct al; Judgment affirmed
Cooper vs.. Clark. Judgment affirmed.
Laye1ty VS. Pratt ct al. Judgment reversed.
Eyster vs.. Sprecht ct al. Decree affirmed.
Blyer VS.. Kline. Judgment affirmed.
Farmers, and Mechanics Bank vs. Ryan. Judg-
Appeal of Hugh McReynolds. Decree anirmed.
Opinions by Agnew, j.
Wolf ct al VS.. Inc Commonwealth, ex rel.
Schleifer. Judgment reversed.
Tifordvs. Fleming. Judgment affirmed.
Walker VS.. Bitner's administrators. Judgment re-
Estate Of Gllas Omdhoudro. Decree reversed.
Gruobs Administrator vs. Grubb. Report OF mas
ter confirmed.
Lehman vs. Kellerman ct al Judgment affirmed.
Commonwealth VS.. Monongahela Navigation
Company. Judgment reversed, and V. I. d. n.
Funk vs.. smith. Judgment affirmed.
Meier vs. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Judg
Lingenfelter vs. Gunniss. Decree affirmed.
DR.. Max Kennedy, Committee Of Sally Mahon, VS..
George Johnston. Judgment affirmed.
Broad Top Coal and Iron Company vs. The
ldddles6urg Coal and Iron Company Judgment
Palmer vs.. Marsh ct al. Judgment affirmed
Swope ct al vs.. The Gettysburg Railroad Company.
The Pacific and Atlantic Telegraph Company vs..
The commonwealth. Two cases. Judgments
affirmed.
Estate. Decree reversed, and procedenda awarded
The Credit Mobilier of America vs.. The Common
wealth. Judgment reversed.
Freeland VS.. The Pennsylvania Railroad Com
pany. Judgment affirmed.
Musseman VS.. Bell.-Decree affirmed
Craig & Blanchard vs. Kline ct al.-Judgment re-
versed.
affirmed.
Schoeppe The Commonwealth.
The motion for opening the judgment in the
further writ OF error is refused, and in this
judgment is given for the Commonwealth on the
to be RENTED.
David Walls VS.. the same.-Judgments reversed
T. van Allen VS.. The Borough of Mi1llintown.
Judgment affirmed.
Opinions by Sharswood, j.
Graham VS.. Long. Judgment reversed
Fahomey vs. Holsinger. Judgment affirmed.
Directors OF the Poor OF Chester county vs. Ma
loney. Judgment affirmed.
Mccullough vs.. Fenton. Judgment reversed.
Schmertz VS.. Shreve. Judgment reversed
Burkholder VS.. Patton. Judgment reversed.
Beatty VS. The Lycoming County Mutual Insurance
Company Judgment affirmed
Elliott VS.. Same Judgment affirmed
Delaware Township vs.. Greenwood Township
Judgment affirmed.
McReynolds vs.. Maltby. Appeal Of John Mercy
nolds and Hugh A. McReynolds. Dismissed with
costs Appeal of Caleb s. Maltby sustained
Harper vs.; Gubbngs Decree reversed.
Oner VS.. Benebrake. Judgment affirmed.
Erie Railroad Company vs.. The Commonwealth
Judgment affirmed.
commonwealth VS.. pennsylvania Canal Company
Judgment affirmed.
Commonwealth er rel. swartz vs. Wickersham
Judgment for the defendant
Pennsylvania Canal Company VS.. Bently. Judg-
ment affirmed.
West Branch Insurance Company VS.. Macklin.
Judgment reversed.
Fiemlng's Appeal. Decree affirmed.
Austin Keene,s Appeal Decree reversed.
Norris Appeal. Decree affirmed
Beams Appeal. Decree affirmed.
BY Williams, J.:-Wntners Appeal Decree altered
The Venango, Central and Duck Creek Oil Com
pany vs. Lewis ct al Judgment affirmed
Thomas Kinson ct al. VS.. Elliot Goodwin Co.
Judgment as modified affirmed
ONeal d Sons vs.. O'Neal ct al. Judgment af-
Coleman ct al. vs. Nauty s. Hencker. Judgment
affirmed
No More Supreme Court NaturaIizations
Before rising the Judge made the following i'm
Ordered TO avoid any further difficulty as to the
mode OF NATURALIZATION, and in view OF the other
sufficiently burdenS0me duties OF the members of
this court it is ordered that the Judge holding Nsl
Pri9s hereafter decline to exercise the jurisdiction
naturalization. Per curtan.
Commemorative Gases.
The Iollowlng cases were decided in favor OF the
Schoeppe vs.. Commonwealth Judgment affirmed.
Delaware, lackawanna and Western Railroad
the commonwealth for s2i,5S7S0 Judgment af-
Lackawanna and Bloomsbury Railroad COMPANY
vs. Commonwealth. Judgment below for the Com
monwealth for $40, S7s56, Judgment affirmed.
monwealth Judgment below for the ComHon
wealth for sl5,6s4'4s. Judgment affirmed.
Pacific and Atlantic Telegraph Company vs.. Com
monWealth. Judgment below for the Common
wealth for S175OT6 Judgment atirmed.
Pacific Ian and Atlantic Telegraph Company Us. Com
wealth for S3lI714 Judgment affirmed.
Erie Railway Company vs.. Commonwealth
Judgment below for the Commonwealth for sss3496.
PIttsburg, Fort Wayne, and Chicago Railway Com
pany ys Commonwealth; Judgment below for
Cleveland, Painesville, and Ashtabula Railroad
Company VS.. Commonwealth. Judgment below for
Commonwealth for s25l1T3. judgment affirmed.
Commonwealth vs. Northern Central Railway
Company. Judgment below for Commonwealth for
pendent upon the case Of Pttsburg, Fort Wayne
and Chicago Railway Company We. Commonwealth.
Besides the above cases In the case Of Common
wealth vs. Cleveland, PainesYles, and Ashtabula
Railroad Company the judgment below for Com
monwealth for s2S2694 is afirmed as dependent
uoon the case OF Commonwealth VS.. the Phladel-
phia and Reading Railroad Company aud the judg-
ment in Commonwealth vs. Cleveland and Pittsburo
Railroad Company for the Commonwealth for sa49
is affirmed as dependent upon the decision in the
case OF Commonwealth VS.. Cleveland, PainesVille
and Ashta6ula Railroad Company, first case above,
ana IN Honey brook Company VS.. Commonwealth,
judgment below for Commonwealth for S4223 80 The
writ OF error was mon pros
Commonwealth vs.. Philadelphia and Reading
Railroad Company Verdict for Commonwealth for
fl4 1896 Judgment below for defendants. Judg-
nent reversed, and Judgment for Commonwealth on
verdict, With costs and Interest.
Commonwealth VS.. Philadelphia aud Reading
kallIoad company Judgment below for Common
wealth for So, Judgment affirmed.
Amohundros Eestate from Lancaster Appeal OF
Commonwealth. Decree reversed.
Commonwealth VS.. Monongahela Navigation Com
pany. Judgment reversed and Venire faclas de noVo
Commonwealth VS.. wickersham. Judgment for