New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-06-16
.l0.UleNAA 4
NEW oRIEA u.s. JUNE e e' 81 :a
: THE ,CoUnrs.I

! o THE ,coUnrsl saaiasaa
Another Phass. ~ she psla.shserAsse,
DsAeuits-ASresse ee sAs. .aleessPsaassu
| Police Conm misai0ne.s-TheY oeo RE
! leased ~ UalieA ststes Csrnipsiese'
Usbsa.S 49, 49, ~ -
An afadssit was fusiS yesterday, before
United States CommissiSner Ufban.. by
james Stafford; for violation Of lhsnlsF-
teenth and fifteenth. amehdments sAof The
CONSTITUTION lof the Uuited stsf1G ands The
civil nghS bill. showing gthat 7WuNm
George, Thomas Isabelle, ]. A. RsgnA,A "A.
81 Badger, r. B. Edgeworth, F. J. Pratt 1hd
G. A. Weed, on or about the fifteenth oi
June, 1870, did combine, conspife and con.
federate together with the inteata "a
the free exercise of hRd dIenploy yAdni
at a butcher, and also in the free exer-
else Of hislcivil rights, to sell and dispose
OF his property. He further ayers that on
the date aforesaid, he had seven beeves Of
the value Of s400, which they, without any
authority, took possession Of. y agrosbA1
| Warrants were issued afor thO ssIrestiIo
the above named parties, aud on absipg
brought before United Statee Comniaaione
this morning. At nine O'Clock. if.Y Ia
| U.ls.d .st.sesc cis.pit cssss,JIsI
| In the case of the United Statesys. =. .ie
Paols, charged With passing counterfeit
1e.s; 1e.s'c, ths 5ary SR 0fougAs
Judge ". B. woods, of the Circuit Court,
left last evening for Mobile. He WIS come
I what indisposed,. on account Of the a1aAnnt
Of work he hadlt6 % through with the
! last few weeks trying. 70 clear the over.
crow ded docket Of the Circuit Court sdsa
Elehth Dlsteiets Coure uiYaH
| State ex, rel. Attorney General vsdF.IC.
Mahan.-This case caae upiyeeterdaEfpe.
fore J. R. Beckwith, Judge ad hoe. on sIple
| for new trial. go, d. se,,T.
Sheridan, who contests the right of Mahan
TO the Office of Tax Collector Of the First
| District ofNew Orleans, was, at the time Of
| disappointment to the Office, on the Grst
9f April,1s the Adjutant General Of The
He said that no citizen could hold two
offices Of trust and profit at the same time.
The appointment OF Sheridan ~ theGov-
srnor WAS null. a9nd void, and besides
she.iafns da r. ,ss spPoinsnent 1a had not bsn esn
After argument; the .eours retaseas to
grant new trial, .''-... y 8 slsonfGi1
tn. M.s..,as' sstsese xa,iese4 Esse.
This ease came up and ivas ss1Hrnned
TkeJeRssssa City MOS CaAess'53
In these cases, wherein the city o. sued
| for damages incurred bysundry persons at a
riot in Jefferson City, in 1853 q continuance
vas granted. ........ ss.rgL gsbct4
n slaushterhoase NevsSsntsii4s
The following motion Was made yester-
=
STATE OF LOUISIANA, ElaaIa D4Tz1cf oous1. !,
State of Louisiana VS.. William Fagsn.-
On motion of Simeon Belden, Attorney
General of Louisiana, and on suggesting to
the court that on the twenty seventh of
July, 1869, the State of Louisiana instituted
suit by injunction In the Fifth District
Esteben, Louis Ruch, Jean Pierre Ronede,
William Maybe, Solomon Firmburgs B.
Beaubray, William Pagan, J. D. Brodefick,
N. Seibel, Martin Lanues, J. Girtzineer,
J. T. Jock and Dominick Verges, being
numbered on transfer in this court No. 1922
and in the said Fifth Court No. 800. enjoin-
ing and restraining said Defendants from
leasing the tract of land known as the
Delery Plantation, belonging to Charles
Cavarec, from using the came for the pur-
poses of. said Live Stock Dealers and
Butchers Association, 40 set forth In said
petition, and Individually and collectively
from erecting. any docks, ways, wharves,
landings, yards, pens, stables and other 1en-
closures for the landing, receiving, stabling.
gardening, keeping and preserving any beef
cattle, cows, sheep, swine, or other snInals
designed for food, In the parishes Of Or
leans, Jefferson and st. Bernard, and they
we're also erjoiAed from slaughteriDg any
beeves, cattle, cows, sheep, swine or any
other animals intended for human food in the
markets of the parishes Of Orleans. Jefer-
son and st. Bernard, and plaintiff would
further suggest that Charles Cavaroc, in
the same suit, was also enioined from selling
or leasing said plantation for the purposes
set forth in the pretended act Of corpora
tion of the Live Stock dealers and Butchers
Association, being the purposes for which
they were enjoined, as recited above in this
rule. s.-7.,5J .,yisa
The State further suggests that said in.
junction was tried in the Fifth District
Court for. the parish Of Orleans. and judg-
ment rendered in favor Of plaintiff, Of State
of Lonisiana, by Hon. Charles Letumont,
appeal has been affirmed by the Supreme
Court of the State OF LoutsianA, and by eaid
Judgment the said defendants are restrained
and enjoined from doing any OF the things
mentioned and recited III, this rule and the
petition in this suit. That said Judgments
are executory.- .'....'-. Ss4S
/ The State Of Louisiana, BY. the Attorney
General as aforesaid, further suggests that
Notwithstanding said injunction, said de-
PENDANTS have erected docks, ways, whsryes,
landings, yards, pens, stables and other in.
closures, for the landing, receiving and
stabling, yardfug, keeping and preserving
beef cattle; cows, sheep, swine and other
animals, in the parishes OF OrleaDs, Jeffer-
son and 6E Bernard. and are besides this,
beeyes, cattle, cows, sheep,
swine and other animals intended for food,
and sold for food, in the markets Of the par
ishes of Orleans, jefferson and st. Bernard
and that. Charles Cay8roc has violated
said Injunction, and Il. now in open
violation of said injunction and decree
as aforesaid BY allowing the use OF said plan.
tatfont aforesaid; that said buildings, ETC.,
were erected in violation of said injunction,
for at the time the same was sued ,out
nothing had been done toward the erection
of buildings for the sianghtering Of animals,
but as it appears with . studied determiha-
tion to Disregard the mandates of the law,
left their former places of business, and
erected the fslaughterhoases In question at
the precise spot where prohibited, and when
completed commenced and continued
slaug htering, and are now Strengthening in
the utmost contempt of law, the Injunction
sued out against them as aforesaid, and the
DEGREES of both. the District Court and the
Supreme Court of the State. ~ :.
1t is, therefore, ordered that ell the party
defendants herein named, show cause ION
Saturday, the eighteenth day Of June, 1870,
at ten O'Clock A. NJ, why the decree rem
dered in this suit and affirmed by the Su-