, 1870-12-10
THE LAW COURTS.
alleged NhIskcy Frauds MOI
Proved,
Libel Suit Against the Times.
Will Of r. M. Hayden-sewer Con-
Hzctx,
UnIted Etates District Court.

7tH Ho.LA>p AND LEACH cAsK-1ERpIcr NOT
GUILTY.
l+nitci States :. HI At j. HoE!aud and Ezbert
L. irAch. tt { t5tAl Of ihts indictment. for re-
tso' lee spirits cotzAr, ~ Law. came 70 couc.Q.
SOY: sesesdss. Tie facts charged, upon the oath
u: we John II RnEEn, htelr government Store
ArrIs'r, and The na'ure Of the Testimony In the
.a'.e- we're stxltd yesierlay. When The evidence
Ha': A.. lrtu delivered tnrrt mas uppu the oarf
.f'unIte! u1Nn either SIDE CrmprJe feufmnI.
70: OF tie taei knst no conviction was ros .ihle
1!,, waved 81 arPumclt Tue case 1as thrr
>''u tad 10 The Jury ur5u the Instructions Of the
t.uf.
tt. Court {Bloaeets, having stated The nntnr< n,
lSr *ft nalu ect hsfKtd- reoisde1 Ihc f1 Y th4f
:'- A"c1ce Of \ confessed Rccompitte III crime
WAS 10 IN received with great canton, and beeyed
or, nls'n e"'I.eorstion; Ne 1hen rrs1e<e,, tae
::uta, Aneug csn.r thing, De 1rterFe1s to rhe
te'l.t3ens 'kAt ~ we're given - tue tnau Bu.Eh
~a:en tr. IN ua,n. declares IL b. iaise, t5e ony
tt&Cr condition helng tha, he should leaye Chica.
&C. ~ tataaEe thAt ehItwt business men
s.;rs nAlle 70 indie nent, wsuli mase each i
e t-ytlo the CITY hto'ta, as ButEh had swora
M.e:. Il pot l'.s printable that tnrr xonld conat-
-"'s,se II p1Wrss: lie vouli not anaisze IL
wh'.e Testimony. but would ailnde 10 some facts,
lIrsa M s'.n,radic:sd m at every ms'ertal point
: as aaa ~, s'%n S1 70 r IN lizard S, to over
s,ae..ss be M ssstsa on that .. p kiane. kmans
1aeLt <aa rse+eat 1t all The violations OF Law,
,tte.'7A!:nE ais hE1rd upon nayrels. That Tss ae-
stti fts hlnnetnenr and other witnesses Who
"trt a.sr prefetst, and beyoni that, II was shown
:sa' he dist!ieis. At Ihe limit p1ed upon aud
fs=:EA sEtEr. could L0t, By any po.sihltity. have
,sst,,a;tn S.1 ,ns IAN amsCns q s elaned .
'ot,,Aa led. tn ren1,4ly, q 10 the fsct maj he
ros;!slana ~htskey went 70 y. y. Dickinson.
X W.. su~eve', for the jury to sat, ia the light
m FsrbF tThA fhA
r','-r.a:!on bal u.dc cut snch 4 case a. war-
!sE;<d yer,',et "f guilty No ct'tzen should be
-! '~':'' 'veI to Ia tnI'luslcs.ly fxlse or even
las?'.'se- Any updne monse Weighing
.,-::E,onr. xher. it wss upcorobora1ed and where
:ar r:ns,uassaasts seemed 70 senderi 4 probable
l1Ers .sd sx.fn 10 ~asi true The Annlls OF
q :c1e ti rot seDce5 that impossible, but the tes-
::lnt uc>; l,e the guide of acttoc, aud the ouly
;.sss; Ia, n, .NAs Rhttacr this mau DurEh was u
r :--.,st.t or crt. whether It Was Rtt~ to mud
.Ezr7 guilty OF crime on the testimony OF The
::4x:.
T.lr s;7r xsa on, just long enough to reduce its
.v.:2t Of " 10: guilty te Whiting.
FIVE kElis Of IAs;KR
f'1.te,l SY1set r. Frederick >Ehnef, This Ia m
ca-tueE a@stnss ScnmcE. a hrerer OF PeoEis,
.AA.c:r Inn 7lth ,he .en"val OF nve Keps OF
.sEsT s'.r ID March last from his brewery, uith-
"a: st1Arr and canctl7s s,lmpa ~ required b.
.aw. t1 trial.
rksxIrx So1Es csrAlD.
asNl tsay:s-, t%siRntt In Gaakfuptcr OF the
Nescaa:!.t Mutual Fire 1nsuranre Company OF
!hraft .'rLn L y 4 7 s.lt. L:sts A. Brown and
Matthew SnatrFr: Dartei %alrersob; Gotttieh
Uho -tnn; Fn,l r1cL D4un garter aud Peter Bar
;..!.: T!"I IS Nuwttkt: William Becker: John
Nn:7ht Il csc are s,t1e other II ttuns OF assunp-
=: aEa.Est the premium nbte- makers OF the baur.
RAT: Insurance. rornrany, Who hare tRnnrrd The
i sMni:ots of the mary previous Judgments
aE2.ns. Parties IN 1tke ftraits.
AsSCNrSlr.
n.v;A H. Whale5 :. James Moore and Martin
q. Ns-krr- AssuupRtt- Demand, <I,o1a
HEAVY DEMAND.
Erha:d n. Lathnlp Ct alA. r. Daniel ", Gale
.sst frarcs l.. Van WycI- !As.umpsi1. Demand,
fE~'.,~%.