New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-06-11
THE COURTS,
United States Circuit Coure2Decrees
In tho Gaiaes Case.

| A decree to the following effect has bee
rendered in the case of Mrs. Gaines. decide
by Judge Bradley on the ninth instant:
Myra G. Gaines VS.. Manuel l. Lizard
ct al, Cripples case.-In obedience to tn
mandate of the Supreme Court of the Unite
States, and the evidence that Myra Gar
| Gaines is the sole legitimate heir of DAME
| Clark, it is ordered that all the prOpert
described and claimed by the defendant
William Cripple, is part and parcel of tn
| property comprising the succession of tn
| late Daniel Clark; that the property con
| veyed by Richard Relf and Beverl
| Chew TO William Cripple, on tn
| Nineteenth Of December 1920, wa
conveyed without any legal authority; tina
| the said sale at auction Was null and void
| and that the def ndant, William Cripple, a
the time he purchased the property wa
bound to take notice Of the circumstance
which rendered the actings and doings o
the said Beverly Chew and Richard Relf il
the premises illegal, null and void, and he
the said William Cripple, ought to b,
deemed and held, and is hereby deemed an(
held to have purchased the property il
question with full notice that the said sal,
at auction under the pretended authority O
Richard Relf and Beverly Chew was illegal
null and void and in derogation ard FRAUD
of the rights of the person or persons emit
tied to the succession of the said DAME
Clark.
And this court doth further declare, or.
der, adjudge and decree, that all the prop
erty claimed and held by the defendant
William Cripple, as aforesaid, now remains
unclaimed and undisposed of, as part and
parcel of the succession of the said Daniel
Clark, Notwithstanding such sale.
1t is further ordered that the defendant
surrender to complainant the property des
cribed in her bill of complaint, together
with the rents and profits thereof accruing
since the eleventh of March, ls47. Ard
the court orders that an account be taken
by --, of the yearly rents and profits
OF the property, and report the same to!this
court. II is further ordered that execution
issue in favor of Mrs. Gaines, and that
she have leave to apply for such order az
may be now or hereafter necessary in the
premises.
Decree'in the New Orleans Case.
In the matter of the claim of Mrs. Gaines
to certain property claimed by the city of
New Orleans, the decision of Justice Brad
ley. rendered on the ninth instant, is to the
following effect:
The court gives Mrs. Gaines q lot of
ground l2C feet square, On the northeast
tween Toulouse, Burgundy, Rampant and St.
Peter streets, together with the rents and
profits thereof, accruing from the thirtieth
Of September, 1886, to the present time. d.
Eighth DIstrict Court
george A. Sheridan VS.. F. G. Mahan.-
An Injunction was yesterday applied for and
obtained from Judge DibbIe, of the Eighth
District Court, upon the prayer of Captain
George A. Sheridan, State Tax Collector of
me FIRST District, restraining the Auditor
1f PUBIC Accounts from warrantiDg in any
way III favor OF f. G. Mshan. the late 10.
for any fees or emoluments arising
,ut of said office, and who was. yesterda.'
l,spossessed by the judgment rendered BY
he Eighth District Court. Petitioner
alleges that he has been commissioned.
sworn in, and given bond for the said office.
Ind that he is entitled to the fees and emolu.
nents Of the same.
Crescent City Live Stock Landing and
Company vs.. Board of Me-
ropolltan Police.-In this case yesterday the
olloWing document was filed:
On motion Of George S. Lacey, City At.
orney, and of counsel for the city of New
orleans, +: W. Pierce, Administrator of
'oice, and s. G. Emley, Administrator OF
Commerce, and upon suggesting and show
ng to the court e
l. That no good and lawful cause for is.
uing the injunction herein granted against
ppearers has been set forth and disclosed
Il the petition.
2. That the Injunction herein granted is
violation OF a certain writ of error,
perating rs a supersedeas, to which the
laintiffs herein are parties.
3. That the city of New Orleans can not,
through the writ of injunction, be made the |
nstrumentallty or agency wherewith to !
AIRY out the pretended rights and privi-
eyes OF the plaintiffs and the provisions of |
be act of the Legislature. approved March |
, 1863, not only for the reason that she is |
'ithout the means of 80 doing, but because |
hat power is given to the Board of Metro |
olitan Police, as averred in plaintiffs |
clifton.
4 That the writ of Injunction in requir.
,g these appearers to "prohibit and pre-
ent any and all persons from selling, or
ffering 10 sell, in the city of New Orleans,
ny animal meat for human food not |
aughtered and inspected at the slaughter
ouse of petitioners" is an unwarranted |
usiness, not only of the citizens of Lousi- |
IA but of the citizens of other States in
le United States, who desire to bring to
70 city OF New Orleans animal meat for
Imam TODD, slaughtered beyond the limits
ithin which the plaintiffs claim to have al
sclusive right and privilege.
o. That the averments of the petition and |
hdaVit thereunto annexed, in reference to
lese sppearers, are untrue.
3. That the writ of injunction IMPROVE
entity. Improperly and illegally issued.
z. That bond in sufficient amount was
OF given, and the security upon the bond
not good and solvent, and such as the law
quires.
1t is ordered that plaintiffs in Injunction
low cause on Tuesday, the fourteenth day
June. A. d. 1870, at ten A. NJ, why the
rit OF Ill JUNCTION herein granted should not
3 vacated, annuled. set aside, and held for
aught, reserving to these appearers their
course upon the Injunction bond given by
alntihs IN Injunction for such damages as
lese appearers have sustained or may sus-
in by reason or on account of such writ.
Tnitsd States Circuit Court.
Bank OF West Tennessee VS. Citizens Bank
Louisiana.-A writ of error to the Su-
rene Court of the United States, at Wash
gton, District Of Columbia, from the de-
sion OF the Supreme Court OF the State of
oulsiana, has been granted by MIR. Justice
radley III the case of the president and
rectors of the Bank of West Tennessee VS..
tizens, Bank of Louisiana. In this case
ere was judgment in the Fifth District
purt IN favor of plaintiff, for 500. 1897 ~.
bis Judgment was reversed by the supreme
Jurt, and the case now goes to Washington.
For the night sweats of consumption,
aiding Partisan physician employs phos-
late OF lime in daily doses of from thirty
ninety grains, with success, it is said.
his suggests that perhaps limestone re-
on Is good place of residence for con-
lmptive.
young cHored man named Sprigg, en-
10y ed IN the Appraisers office of the Baiti-