, 1870-01-11
GILBERT W. BOWNE'5 $2.O0O,000
Further Complicntione-Gr
among the Cob,vtbs Of n Qnarlcr
Of n Eenlury-Wnx The Wall Spin.
rs0us ?-Gcncrna Dnryen Accused
OF EEAuu-Coun1cr EhaEgcs-E1ne
Chance for the Lauyerx

SFoHa 1Hf -sS3f J 6T& *3H3l, jan. a.
Tie arEument Of the motion to continue the re
ceistlshp IN the suit ~ Elizabeth RodDas
BoHre 10 set aside an ap,eelent making
dists,on e property 70 which she. with otners
Waa co.uLutd yesterday before Judge Gard ,z2
Surren Court Chzmters. The controversy ID
sure Of rs aspects extends. It appears to trans-
ncttGrs Of over quarter Of q ceotufy ago.
RCdG an HoELe engaged IN business In this
city cary tn NE, ana established the rrst terry
e We, ITO pa.;nessnip .th ts bros5er sa aSusi.
he, It il stated, 1urrah!ng the ca:1ial.
In 1s3e, being teized with what be supposed
p,op@r.y 10 hlB brother Samuel. lie recoveten,
ho"c'er, and coLtlnned II business, d5tng In 1s45
CT paraiJs:s. The will Of 1889 Was thea sdmltted
10 pronate. Samuel deVised TO biz 6a3 gilbert ".
three iou1ths Ct all the real estate be opia!ned
from his nso'ht Rot1 an Roomao E, the only
other SOD Of samuel died II his fathers lifetime,
Leaving IN only chic, Elizabeth RodnA1 tne
liz o11y daughter, Elizabeth, Who Vas the nszr
Iatner. lie Rase her BY his viii The r+mal3Iuc
fourth Of The estate for lite The remainder oVer
Gtutrsl DH1Jea, unn er the 8 stu:e, took lle 10.
teIest urter hts share Of the fourth.
About 5esr ago, MARI D1aan, d.ushter OF az
OtLef brother Of Rodn Al Bowie, brought 41 &C.
Ton RRa1t st General D1iJeA, hich is sitl pend
iiE, u ret sttoe the . III Of her uucie. made In
1ssa. She claims that samuel had repeatedly told
BIZ nrpthef that hat viii h.o been deAtfo5 ed, and
Inst Rot1uan had repentedly Id biz niece that
he would male no wu. b1t would die ln,astate.
The will IVES Witnessed bJ Mes.rf. Pei and
ReEfeD, both DOW deceased. Ar. Fell testidel
that the o.ner was not present when be s,gued it.
thai be ctd not see Nj. 70 s'gu IT. anu Ina{ he
ciu rot Tell lin {Pe1D that 1t Was DIS VIII he also
stated that te had been offered $4,000 for testify
ing to he proper execution OF tee will
IN ls4s proposition Fss made By General Dur
yea Tor 6ettcl ent, tue oppoetnR paE-1e8 receive
ttetaDe amount lbey would be entitled to II Mr.
BoWpe Lao died fn'estAte. Af:erwards, Genera
DuTyea pEepssed eno presen'ed E4t OF real es~
tate, IN Which was pufpofIed to Sc. forth al the
purelty OF RrdusQ BoWte. Cpou the fsi,n of
tnik E'atenetL ~hch. It Is cItiusd, AZ OF elm&.
lar statement In the e1t after EArus tu11-
ed out 10 te false, the parties caue To an agree
mtn1- r..
The suit Of M,,s Dugaa involves the property in
Geueral Duryea's present wife, who was the
WIDOW OF Gilbert ". Bovine, uatea at0day1t upoa
this motion teas legacy navl: z beeo given her
tIser her husbands E14 except $1,000 under
her naldeu name, GhE commenced proceedings In
1853 for atmehBurene1t ct dover.
The gross value Of the pFpnerty assigned her,
which went Into the psaiLtt1's share, unceE tne
agreement ct Aprt, 1867, NOW Fought to be set
as;de, Va4 515s $50. the yaiuc OF ber COS ef IN.
Ieyess in IDOL eJ, according 10 the Northampton
tables, ua1 teI,s41, which was more than rue
EAlne OF tie rr perry relss sed to h.r IN fee TIE
Ta]ne Of the saue property IL 1851 WIS tel7r roon.
While the vblue o, tre eane property size ra.
ceiyed In Zee Was slss T5o. sac dtntes that there
wa5 any fraud. Case on tr1tl