The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1870-11-29

supfkoA ccuAT-SPscAl Term.
Arsi.~ 90 . Charge Of Alleged Wife Sc.
ascsioa.
Before Judge Spencer.
csow Hoaehton.--Thls Is an action on charge
Of ev4w eosI, the plaintin accusing the defendant
win the seduction Of his rne piaintlfrs) wife and
placing me damages ~ $4,000 Tho defendant
ssssss 20 .ssw ssusc Way Tie deiendant should not
se snesrvgAisd a. 10 the iacts In the case. 1hi s
fall~s 10 appear nls ccunsel sad he was sick. An
..tA1hmsnt VAS issued Tor has appearance on
Wednesday wien there will be an investigation In
Dssarre Ssis-skssvtax she Trials and Tribu-
istsss. Of q Dswiteh hing Biendc.
Before Judge spencer.
frwf~rck W. f0rd ~. Mary Elten Ford.-Ths Is q
son fVr divorce charge " adultery. The plaintiff
IN IN assistant CLERK In The First District Court
b@th rsrnes are young, having been married only
about eighteen months ago II IL certain that nothing
enlogistc can be said Of the appearance Of the
plnlnun. Ne has very hardened. rcpelant look,
and hsa thlnly scattered mnstache and lacK-lustro
eye~ oniy intensity this general expression. The de.
fvnaant on che con,rMy, ~ quite prepossessrng In
sppestsnce belonging 10 the order OF bcauteously
es~ach'ng bisndes. and being neatly aud tasleiully
1rsesea. In his complaint he charges her with
Divers marital indiscrctaons with divers persons, tie
nrst beng VERY shortly arer their marriage. Ito
ssasoa a. waitress "a H. ". nre s.n Gsrdea
ana subsequently, In the .Orientai.n She denies in
NET answer the Allegations, eNCe.t as committed
through his pf1viy and connlyance. A 70 being
waitress ~ the broadway Garden she says tins
was ~ hes insilgaticn, ~ he pleaded poverty and
inablliiy 20 support her otherwise. She further
atets taGt he used ~ come after her about midnight,
when uniyfrsally his nrst question would be, "How
mach inooey nave you made lo.nightff II the SUN
wyuii beat Der wbea tpey got nome, Tor not making
more she charges hid \ ,h continuous acts OF
cruelty anu once In the preeemce OF her mother, who
puts Ia ia anidayn confirming TINS part or the
Statement. Among The catalogue oil her counter
csssges v one that he kept woman In Crosby
street, ane that he boasied 81 Keeping another, aud
that his income nom his clerk hip, though nomi-
nally only 1xh a nleRth. was $4,000 year. Upon
tns she claims counter relief on the ground oil inhu
man treatment and asks ior separation and that
10 part 81 support o. his allegations, presspled
sa.p ~ Inc M.sS ps ns%sa
description Of herself assuming that she and the
person 10 whom the letter In written had never met,
and then goes on 10 Aay how much she misses him,
y not living with aer and don't care ANYTHING for
him. This letter she denies Having written.
The Judge heard the arguments Of counsel on
both SIDES and then took the papers reserving his
decision
DecisIon..
Garter ~s. clavk.--Mo,ion granted
Louis Douglas %. ue East Racer Ferry Company
Melton granted.
HaH -. SheySnan.- Order denied
xatfzeu 80. FtndaA--Motion granted.
hcGrafh ~. BsfL--Motlon granted.
Undc1'hW g. LvsG-Judg.nent ON and sustaining
the demurrer.
A1beri Apea ~. stepcnson.--order granted.
Coihia0 yor an Attachment Is. George q. ceaet.--
Reference ordered.