, 1870-01-29
THE COURTS,
Alleged False lmpfisonmcnt-.
A Merchant sued Tor
S25, 900.
Another Straw BaiIor in Trouble
Criminal Business.
Police Court Proceedings.


LI1nuEu YA161 MrEs0NAx1T.
Josspn Il. Martin '. Frederick y. H1mlln.
Tresp4s 70 recover for sn alleged false arrest hut
iuarR,souuent Damages laid at m 900. The
plainuc Ftslted Ao emplose OF the dcfcnda1:,
ana charges tha: on the e2d OF May last, ~ he
w.1 leaving the store, h15tnK ya1se IN hin
hand, Hamlln stopped him and caused
hIa arrest upon charge Of larceny, or upon ens.
picion Of larceny, whence he vas after 1asd dis.
charged upon an examination at the AFmosJ.
The defcuce II that 4 ArA Kendall, 4 fore woman
OF the eSuhliAhEenS In its manufacturing DEPART
meal, Hn guilty OF s0ndJ pecolatlone, lnst she
lived in the house cI plalnnh, aho, upon tbs &C.
caRton tn question, visited her and Tecelre ed tho
vk41e, In which Wa h3tf p1tce Of muslin. known
70 h1ve been s,olet. Subsequently MIS-. Kendall
pkld for lnis and other goO<is that Ind been
miased. wherefore 1t was argaed thAt there VAS
reasonable cause Of suspicion, 1usiditnE tae a.
rest On trt1l.
STREET clR INCIDENT.
janes r Henry '. The Chicago CITY RAILWAY
Company and Mlcnael Moral ITeapas4 Damages
lad At 9E,O0d This Is an action 70 recover for m
alleged exclusion from car Of the company hy
The coEpauys ctdsfeIdanr. ~ agent. The
p1AEt1n dtcaTes that o. the s9th Or december
Inst he pa}d the amDunt OF hts fare 70 tue driver
Or conductor ol c4t No. II. on lbs Indiana avenne
1lue np.wItns.An K ~h:Ea ht Was eIected from
The eas. and, a he claiAs, seriously injured l.
o1norr, oil ,'' aisn.ed 10 10 rstss i @ iato
posluon. Having Gone this. plaintiff rcoecap,ed
1rt refustu, pttnud saying he had already paid.
Thereupon ne was elected. the cRI oenR In mo-
feil npon the roadxsy IN such position tnat bla
head Has seserelJ Injured. whence, It Is Claimed.
be Cannot permanent, recover.
Eishn Mason Y. Curtis Z, Meserre. Action Of
the casc- Damages lsid 1t 5lo0,090 In tnls oaae.
plaintiff deeiarea 1nat ne nsEct.atea purchase Of
hiEseu 10 oe lie :. agent @ oi ID eeSf oaner
OF huch tact OF land. The neRotAtIon
resulted IN the making Of contract
me q Re
payment. Il turned uur, It was charged. that the
representation OF AeseSve tnat no wzs axent.
authority TO sell THIS su1s Was tnadtutod 70 re-
cover, q in csse Of traud And Deceit tue $50
PAID, as veil ~ the difference between the price
vslue Il 1ae tine tic conveyance oagni to a.vo 10
heen made under tue contract TnA Court hsld
that In this cAse the plaintiff could recover tbs
$500 which he had paid, but could not recover
hs damages, the dl1ereuce Of p1ce. Tne1eupon
plaintiff dsxMtssed thla action.
YuAIcIosCRE
Cafh1t1nh Bt5HMAnn :. Henry D. 2. Qo114ar OF
nlt Rul TO torrlotc upon The tateres: Of defend
ant In Lat 3, Book = Rogers Subdivision Of tne
Of ~ aqa5,ds55 no,d o
tce Sehoerc usit responsible for any loss from the
consider. .t.ou pttce upoo aaic made The eom-
nTesisd the sun Of roo n1 louulnE 1t 70 Holster.
AlzH5ex, upon RECOMMENDATION Of 5choend NAlds
II being represented that Husster held title n fee
to the properly. She has now d,1eoycrc5, she
eLate6, t1st ne has but N equitable interett
ptseIFAT1HG cL6rD.
Thomls @ n jordan paalsl T. s "ensmSrta =,
fourth pa1t Of IN undivided hkll Of the west hall
naas &c Ct ssd T. d a.
caQo Rock Ialand KalltoAd Canpany, and ter
nefcs conveyed 10 Cook coansy Tor the uass Of 3
- ~ SPECIFIC PERFORMANCES,