, 1870-10-18
THE LAW COURTS.
A New and Novel Proposition
That Would Not Work.
An cx-Nc,v.r,.J,cr f1an In Limbo
---Tle End Of stcklcs.
Insurance Slander---0pe1ing Of the
Term Of the Circuit Court.


/, rKar.,.,rluS THAI woCLnxI WORK
N,5v Ann >lr HI =. Jacob St1ehl. This is a |
;s.r..,l,ng f,r .l.vorc-, In which defendant de-
;t,j.t. " answer. The tssue having been made
III. .arT.it3tton II made on the mart OF com. |
,a.tani that the Court rrfer an issue made up for
ury for trial to one OF The Minister'S Of the ccnrt-
VIII ..rci!ons 10 the Muster to take verdict iu
:..- ,aer, End report the same, with the evidence
.rt':r IoItt fnT approval
i-t.uIt d at1eSLt,) decided: This IL, to me-
Ii. Is, mtt,on, arh IT mas b0t been supported by |
~. A:GL:aeh: On the part VI the counsel making
.;..i:5ct aas It btcu oplosct1, nor any authcri-
exhibited orrostne II, On the part oi the ,le
;.-c':- have, therefore. to decide the motion on
-'y', Msh1s ~ myself have Ut have teen xele to
&s statute Ct ths State relating Il, lliyorc. rro-
>l's tEai, " IL a!l c1>-s for tror,:e, where tile
~. .Edant shall a:.in4 4s and seiy the charges in
:ae so1nlalt ant, III! or alleged, the same
shall liz tiit j by a jury. a tr7Al, therefore,
III vase u ,n.s lima. where these ia IN tssue
made ur, lnnr, u. bs Jury. The question il
whether II 1uusl be had ,.rfeir Judge, or MY
in" had before 3 Muster III E't4nccry
un1esEtaul th.. authorities In rexani to
tcrocutort questions. relating 10 either the law
Ut i1cts n cdse. may Ire Feftrrrd fo Master,
and he may e required to report his opinton upon
the point uf law, rcfhtt :uc f1cts and the cot-
clus0h at1fxttl ny htn from The Testimony OF witt
besscs taken ,eta1e tnlScls au. that. Ghls coming
rspor, " ~ sai,sm., x .vsrsu,s Il ,ns C@us1 SIS
IMPRESSION ut the time til,s uola1 was iilcl was
,is 10 nI, s t IT, 10 as, eexe Wouia
involve tue isusse-=,ua Ut judicial po9c:s. haze
not doubt ut all that. psaclts1l!E, Issues of this
kn. csSu. Just sct1 br tr1t- rcfH:e Mister aS
1rfnre IHn1t, ar'l ii Is i1ls:ar to III" prIfess3n
that lsSues as tu raiIiagrs III cases have Fuf ceu
fulles heen trie.l l:tore the SneltG AMI u jury,
ard vcr,licts taken In the nature Of tatn.s tnefc
is NJ reason why Master Ruls1t lot h. well Ut
tent It shtFn. int 1nt t~elri Is that
il Is not within the 'lu.y VI Mtser. nnhtr our
statute or rahe5 the general Powtrs recognized
existing In Mas!ezH- 10 ,ake and try an issue Of
Ih1- kint. ......' ..
The onl5 authority 10 which aEy reference has
let made " the ccse of Mcclav, etc. ' Norris,
sGIman, ssG, in WHICH. cttlaE IIasI,olrs CbancegE
law or equity, IT disputed tAct or facts which
Muster lay hot hlse Occasion u decide upnn, or
rt44.yt.ns witch be May . mt +. called riou t4'
vtftoYt bis OrIu!nn II, th- tnu-L ..-. 49,
Tbls il ys1v hr,,as1 language: bu, I think It
must he takra li:ue'i. as tlrst etatesl ny int,
1 s:tsn sF,siuz tt ti.r sas:s already IN INC ca-c
tur frvtsion by the a.nurt. nr h. NAV take feEt-
n:ouy, and rrI,or tits s;onciusons as 10 the fact.
al.o subject 10 lhe ttxislu vi the Court: hut 1t
x.uid lie all cxct~s Vi anthu1i'y fur the court u
refer 10 him IN lssus tn s tIrdi bs js.ry. Oar
s;:t.Ete .l nit .utIt1zr II, II seems, aua ltarc
~, rscoll.ttnn Gf Asir skn tDe OF EhAIcetJ prac-
-,t.. which would AuthuI,xe it.
Muttan 6yer.u'c.t- -..-.#
4 Rich nEBTnR-
,IaueA Kelly Int n1vld Mc1zenhcimcr '.
~, 1ryr t.t.tsl ard Iouls ltrdcMrycE. csetl!tors'
iii died Fel,snar. u. 1919. upon rrturn exc
u,skr tht amount of u judgment Of 1870 AMI
- sts VI suit The liz, l. lasr1l ut",n inf1r1latieu
Ut the existence oi rerlalu NIt~. male ny ftNie-
mrScr tu ucttel tn the a1uuunt Of fs,sle. secured
t,y chxt.ei mortgage. An tujunCtsu Issued
,s:aiafne,i4 a,eo ihr nsua' s+ari,ns interfpsa-
lus1es to tAe ownership hy 'trts. Ut other prop
r1ts. The tictrn.int. came IN with my ansxet,
admitting tht. owner, .lP I1 the note, party paid
NuweIeF, AMI unt utlv III the Llrte l'at sauAhlt
ts,uuu3 intssrst tu ushls,sE now USED for schoo
rurl,ses IN lesctl lots, unlncumbsrc.,, as well Is
h.s hpn1tsteai, values. III si.0tL The tnosson VIA:
nw tu dissolve the ;ntuucuor- In view OF TIL
fau that ihs toAsnr.t ma E;en reorcnea t.
hl1n, the Judgment hu~erer. ftihlintng as Sc
.a1iy. aud IN view Il tnc a.te 1nca:ls 70 fer6','
The it,juactun sf1rulh be 20 tunttc1l ns to rcle1s
Vii rrsrc11s til, tut n"se ani tae homestead.
synKkSrKH OF 4 sarIssltsr 1f fE11@" 1oCR
SAtI*IN.
,;-xsrc \, t.rsfu I v .Iann w SIck,cs Thi
was All actsn "a the ca.c t, Recover fur mont
a1Icvrl to lasr ,,t,u +: :1uuu1cuuy kept sack irp1
-u1oLrys reccsSed ~ siei.4IAut, who Canvass
sn col!ect.ai fs.r alv'tt,se Ieu:s IN weekly put
.icasion. tu,i:meht <a$ some t!:nr sln''S t.s
the Y.swrr,luS was cr.11thGsc,.f capia5 Issue,
ana to release The defendant vim u: one thu
'is,n sss'ss3.es I'll il Ms,i,e ass. Gorge ". r kas
vent hts hail lIrie.nan1 thefeupon put In ak
@ 5 s rcn nae,a e"a, ae ae
INTO custody of tne Aching sner11, taS!as qua
CASES COMPROMISED
Eal,c Corxls Y. The MercaAAls lasusanrc Cot
lanI- This wns An NJ ton - recover the value
n- ~ Snnrr1nr mid Mars, H. ,ure time since 4
struTt.I hT lEx IN tug curtr.a hy an tnsurnu
In,r1 III fhi1 r..,,,I,uN1. The case was IN t1lal
Fndsr aud ratl1ed over ~ tnis week. AT u
inn.. Il was cnnrtuu,ts.-l a. was also q SIC !,
Snit IN rrxoSsr On s1,,thrs p.ltcy, an1 one OF /
LAWS huh,,an., covering houses. Sos- 173 a
5So1th .is1tr1 .r,t.
clCsEs 0S Trial.
Marvin I4wre.cre = :. .{l.twrenrc. SiXsen, a
I,a,!I y, Isaac Meaus. This Is al action OF sasuu
III in which tue <iItll4srA Mtr laid Ut $6.DV0 7
Al, c,tion t. that ~ Ih, 18th OF tnl5 l9G9, t.e
t..tlarf ,,uFrha-, Il nf p1sut.IS 3,tU bushels
ii m nj tic rFtc.. vi 81. IN Der Lushr, huytts {
;.- t,,t.rp tiu,itr ti,c rear lSt9, raymcn
IN. 1nai- IN Il. fvr'y. II !. rna'G-t t1nt ,refc