The New York herald., 1870-03-06

IN the divorce case-and some OF them were nom
the lrince OF Wales others from LORD Core .sar ar
Frederick tombstone Captain Farquhar ara otner
lasnl0nable but verv "fasL men, the fasesL OF TUG
last. lie then came 70 london-tne connnemens
waters aud CHI lmbermaids at tile Alexandria and
Palace hotels, At botn OF which Lady Mordaunt had
resided Tor q few days respectively. when she nau
come uD to London for a few dayB for the purpose
OF consulting her medical adviser. On one OF these
occioAs she wrote W Sir Charles the folio wing let
ter:-
PALACE HorrL, BuoKIsGuAM GATE, Nov
MY DAEtIsa CnAsLiEne line q say shall not be able
ono which reaches $40 Send carriage TO meet me- felt
S ~; al sys .nS %
tell you AL about i when come home
'0a' AA''''AAa HARRIET MoRDAUNr.
SUSPICION AND DIVORCE.
Ancr-ln the following month or March. MS chlM
M navinx oeen born N Febraary-his su,picions were
fay aroused. Sir Charles found that the very even
lng which his wie felt SO norroly dulV she spent
with Captai Farquhar at the hotel and went alone
Win MN To the theatre. Is 1t then surprising Sr
Charles resolved tnen and there never to see ms wie
but TO sue for divorces
When he had finally determined upon this step,
her lather determined to set up the plea that sle
was insane and tnat her confession OF guiit TO her
husband were merely the ravings OF q mad woman
And this Is now the that s being tried whether
she In or Is not mad. and therefore whether. IN the
latter event, sne is not ut to answer Tor herse II
she is proved 10 be mad, or to have been mad when
she disclosed her guilt lreal suppOsed to her hus
band OF course the trai VIII not go on ana she WIN
be Kept more or less under restraint II Is not for
me to anticipate the decision OF the jury as to her
state OF mud, but the evidence gwen goes very
lar 10 disprove any such suppostlon For instance,
here II Inc ldence yesterday by Nr. CadOgan.
the clergyman or Walton, q gentleman who could
hardly nave motive IN trying to prove one thing
character ought to place nun above sdspicion:-
Tho Rov. Abel cAdogan, examined by Mr. Indsrwfek.
Csare. Nori.asi soms tim saw Lady Nordaant on the
sn no, TO ss sas s: :
e1la was eoph int asked Ss her how she wss ss said
28h OF March, then had conversation with her; At the
@ M or s 81 s .s sG no of %
received lester from s Charles stating his great sorrow
ana and mye S rs 10 S.r be sns on ,s
cha9sh - asa .na h.r % %,na as sasi'sa sealS
Soraaaa. i ssosna saw , her on .he, ,S sssS
Lady Mordaun. IN her own bondoir;.I asked her how
sss sssn was s aa is Mrs. then shs s
ton and Lady Moraun asked why she hat no: been to see
viii not 2e aoe 70 prove the nonsense that SPOKE ana
n In She Mss ss
TOLD ner ina. nner sne oi er ase ne
.onehias herr e answer that tina. she
ss to s take
into the garden " .nee .t her. on the ;rh q April IN
the
h M
that she wished the little baby be
saSs s hss snat
hra e ra and ey ss fsS .a
s yS1 want % aad Ldy mSIasn! s ssp
BY pr: Deane had l,e conversation with Lady Nor
da mt when went to baptze the chd have not the letter
SIR Ghares wros me; 'Iint e IS at home dont think !
aud then describe bis dis that his wifs.
after nim oaily woui do him the justice to
church sunday mornn received the letter the 25h
70 Lord enzance the letter read to her when she
crel. an made no remark
and the 26. o. April her four or nve times a. her own
s.D ma aG on er Is aa 81 M
would not be able 70 prove c explained to her ,ha,
iumd d nos said :Sans to hsr
bass said the wies Of the soa1srsaon
sa.on ion CANNOT say exactly what sIs changed win;
% ss s & ssG :s The The
last time .aw her was sooa the child being publicly Is,
a, oace aud took no time 70 consider she sr
the sister, Isuggeted rodfahsrs and
or May the last time saw her.
was to ns best 2, my non 10 al he.
scandal" meant her statements: what told her be-
before and aor ths il does alter Inc view
take.
THE PRINCE OF WALES.
The evidence that has come out on this trial re.
Specting the Prince or NaeS does not, as yet ana
may not TO tae emo, crfninate bus Royal Highness
hear that the case VIII not be over to-day but Is
to be postponed until Wednesday next IN order to
give tue Prince time TO come to London. lie is a
witness for Sir Char es MOrdaunt, and must there
fore have been cilea Ia order TO prove that tne
Shall nave by the next or the following steamer.
so Tar as Sir Charles Mordaunt was examined yes
terday the following was what he said respecting
Were you M Charles Mordaunn aware tha, tho Prince OF
believe You had no PERSONA acaan ance with bis Royal
Hghness! cannot that knew him wel have spoken
bu. beyond that you had no acquaintance with him lie
you perfectly vel that he acquainted
AMI i On visiting terms with her famys Certainly
Dd he ever come your house on anv invitation OF your
Dd ever have eoascrsaton with your wife abou
him? We hal conyersation
continuing the acluaintance Idd warned her against
For reasons governed your mind. you desired
that she should not continue an acquaintance with him!
Lord rsnzanceCan you tell US what you said to ber'
which caused to make that remark did not enter into
You did no. wish her to retain his acquaintance, did
Mr. Sergeant Baantns- the time expressed that
knowo lgs been two occasions at housef
And was yfer thar ina. expressed that wish to Lady
Mere IN n afT Yes
Southern division NarIckshc up the
Were you aware q ts acs aa alter 9fes conne
ment that the nce Of Wales had been constant visitor to
We're You aware a any existed between
your Wi Q and the Prince! no, was not.
Are yon saying that literally that not personally
aware OF letters passing between them! have
any letters
Lord Penzance-iad yon known the fact? that Ia tho
question cannot recolect tina. there was correapon
dence.
lord Penzance- ce--rhat Ia not the question.
Mr. Sergeant Balanti1G-Nare aware that letters had
passed. between Prince OF Nes and your wifo before
her confinement that had recey ed letters
from him before had spoken to her.
Lord Pcnzance-Aro you aware that before your wo's
confinement aud since you expressed wish To her on
the subject che had received letters from the Prince OF
Wales cannot recollcct having secn such ctters
Lord Penzance That Is not the question: Whst we want
to know whether that there was CORES
pondence or not! Not before her copnnsme1t.
he queatton OF the learned Sergeant whether you were
that tGee correspondence OF any sot howcier
trivial going on between wife and the Prince OF wales
Mo- know of nothing.
MIR Sergeant Bal an.ine- supposng the Prince of
Wales has been ut house scvea occasions wien
you Attending the House of Commons, nade
acquainted with the iactr was uo except On one occa
sion.
Lord peazance you know any other thu.
he called? Mo- nsvsr heard OF the frequent visits that he
made.
surely you answer simple question as that. You