The Carson daily appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1865-1870, 1870-07-06

The Washington correspondent of the
New York Tines, in Wednesdays dis

The Washington correspondent OF the
New York Times, in Wednesdays dis
patches, says:
The cable dispatch from London in the
newspapers this morning, stating that Lord
CArendon had announced that the United
States intended to raise its mission to Eng
land to one of the first rank, and that the
courtesy must be Teciprocated by the estab
iishment of an embassy at Washington in
lieu of the present mission, is in part erro-
neous From official authority it is learned
that for some time past it has been intimated
BY British officials that the mission to the
United States would be raised to an embas
~; that her majesty would send an ambassa-
dor instead of minister plenipotentiary.
The United States has sent to Great Britain
its highest mIssion-a minister plenipoten-
tiary. We do not send what are technically
termed ambassadors, because our ministers .
represent the Government and not the per-
son of the President, while ambassadors rep |
resent the sovereign, and their acts are con- |
siderec and held as the acts of sovereigns. |
England, France, Russia, Austria, Prussia |
and Spain have our ministers plenipotentia-
~, vet none of those nations sends to an |
ambassador, while in point of fact our min
listers have as much official power as ambas-
sadors, although they do no, rank as high at
any of the foreign courts. There will be no
change ia the character of the United States
mission. but it is likely there will be not only
IN the English, but In several other missions
at Washington.
When We fell upon this extract We
hoped to find something in it explana-
;o.y of the reports relating to the Pres
iieat's determination to recall Motley.
The reasons for such action are all a
mystery here. The only possible ex- !
PLANTATION of the matter that We can
conjure up-aad i: seems too absurd 10 i
be seriously eateriainei-is that Mot '
I-y's family is about to be placed in {
lose relations with the English sristoc
rAey through ths marriage of his daugh- c
Ter to titled Euglishman. We have
never seen a line in print detrac;ing 3
com Motley's high character, and never {
heard anything ba: words Of praise for
lin. 1t is very remarkable tia. our :,
exchanges are so reticent upon this sub u
ct. The Washington Chronicle of Q
ane 25 only makes the matter more in
By the following CON- !.
1ents: 4
With reference to the rumored removal of Ii
dr. Motley, present American Minister to I,
England, il may be stated that it is believed II
nat the President intends to remove him as
Don IS a suitable successor can be found
ut not for the reason, as stated, that Minis
er Motley has been derelict in the matter of p
he Alabama claims. The further report Al
hat the President will insist upon the resig- Il
Iati0n of Secretary Fish in order that he
nay take Mr.. Moiley's place, is not con- A
rmed BY inquiry in the proper quarters. :,
here seems no doubt, however, that Mr.. :.
'ish could have the mission if he should de- 81
ire it; but up to this time it may be posi- 81
ively stated that no conversation whatever e,
as passed between the President and Sec b.
etary Fish upon that subject. o,