, 1870-05-13
SUPERIOR COURT.

HOSE DC1LDr;G.
faanEn aF Pay e9an qa4 cea es VS. M
stssea s that he soasnt % ! house on ca1nines aia
fhsn comr1ssea, but whics Was 70 be Delivered
constructed according to certain plans aud speci-
acations 4e sued y recover for variations aud
knowledge OF the defects instructed the architect
who supcrintended the work to Eeep his place, as
s meant q sus ard 1ort,ore 70 caplan n The
The Instructions OF the Court, 11nder which the
II tuere were hidden de1sc1s in the work or n11-
c1tal use,l In The 1nuse No 1t5 Calumet arenne,
md smcincations. and II plaintiff, being Ignorant
OF 1hein, accepted the work done, and tho defects
were afterwa1d revealed, and they, BY their exist
such acceptance did not w,iEe the nghs to recover
for the damage resulting from such defects. aad
that the plaintiff toos possession mad sod TIC
house. did not constitute m acceptance OF waiver
Of The right to hase the work properly done. The
INV docs not require the owner of house to ahaa-
p l 9n tea a,e rl u o. accoT
possession and hold defendants to rhets conttae:,
or to rEcase item, and 1t Is for the fury to say IN
what way possession IVES taken; and defendants
are not released because an architect elnploJed
ihs arcteet ae1s ad isss9ad MarS or mat. nat
cations The contract gtr1ng him this tight n8less
r.
then defendants arc liable for anr dama.ea
aite1Tsrda, during The e rros1ess Of tue WORT,
as the contract called for, sud Intended to claim
such TO be the fact md damages therefor, and
Ell I'M a1 20 70 e ma Sp abe s Ssns eaa
justided the defendant IN understanding that INC
islta intending 70 eoafo1n n 10 the contract, aud.
because Of his understanding, not remedFtng a1y
as to lie amount which vou1d have 1eSaedicd tie
defects whcn they we're trst Known.
din / Co, :. Be]den F. Culver / Co. Thts Vas an
action on Teplevin bond. In September. 1sts.
ens kng 5ousns q eats f. at ~ ~
man, Hardin l. Co. consignlnr the grain to them
Descndants rrrlcvincd the erain claiming spc-
mat Cnshmsn i Co. had 1now1sdgo oi
plaintiff rendered for s+.ssass.
Petition Of Jane R. Adams, guardian Decrec
of sale OF the Fo4h sixteen acres Of the north
ter q Section es 8, i, I east D. n n, sY esces stp
OF land occupted Uy the Chicago Il Rock Island
Eait1oas, tue property Of Susan ~. Rockwell and
few days since, bu: clerical error occurred In
the decree, hence this revision.
Peoples HCSfSEsS4
Patrick Duneen, and Timothy and Thomas Dds
coll, tried on "Wednesday under al Indictment Tor
rct at Lenont. were found guilty lease stated yes
tetuagj, wherrupon tie Court 1ued Dnnecn SIS
End the two Dt1seo1ls each so, which 1ncs theT
laid, aud were discharged.
GRAND JCRf.
The Grand Jury Tetu1n ned into court nine Hills Of
Indictment including the following:
CnatIes Kruger. Burglary ii the dwelling
lpuse Of Nnnnc J. R.nEs and larceny OF butter
Same. Larceny OF s hog from Name J. Menks.
Charles johnson and Thomas kcnucy. Rane
committed on Eliza A. Baker. -.
Ssme- Larceny Of clothing from James P.
EaEet.
Thomas johnson. Placing distractions On the
track OF the Illinois Central Railroad COMPANY,
viii felonious iutent
NEW EC1T.
Alolphus H. Rothgcrhcr =. Philip Gold stein,
tTreslass on the case Damages laid at 5000