National opinion. [volume] (Bradford, Vt.) 1865-1874, 1870-01-21
orange County Court.

=
No. Is, johnson VS.. Sargent, was
tried 10y jury as has already been
stated, with verdict for plf. DIT. /
moved to set aside verdict, but the !
motion was not sustained. White F.
and DenniSon for plf. Dickey and
iIebard for oft.
No. Il, Samuel T. Champney VS..
Estate Of Mary Champney, Mary b.
Stevens claimant, was heard but no
decision given. The case IS with
the court. Leslie & Rogers and He
bard for plf Dickey for diff
No. 90, VIM. p. Garfield VS.. NJ. NJ.
/ Avery. RepIcyin Of horse. Notice
to diff. who is ont of the state. PROV
ed. Plea in abatement by diff. which
was demurred to by plE Hearing
on demurrer, and judgment Of court
pro toImd. that demurrer he overs
ruled. Exceptions by plf and cause
passed to Supreme Court. Farnham
for plf Clarke and Martin for dit.
No. 10, John Z. Steele VS.. Frank
Dotcn.-The diff. was schGCl dist.
collector in Randolph, and had di-
strained property Of plf for the pay
mcnt Of taxes due from him. plf.
brought suit claiming that the school
district had 10 legal existence and
; consequently diff had no authority
to collect taxes. Judgment of court
for diff, exceptions by plf. Perrin
and Rowell for plf. Boyden and
DenniSon for DIT.
No 80, Il. II. Allen VS.. Ellis Bliss,
This suit was tried by jury and yer,
dict for pll. SG2LSG as has been be-
fore stated. Oft. moved to set aside
| verdict on the ground of newly dis
| covered evidence and surprise. It
was claimed that the record Of Nc
Duilces deed, which described the
south line of the premises bought
, by Allen of Bliss. was not recorded
; correctly. and that the copy of re
cord used before the jury at the trial
= gave an incorrect description Of che
line in dispute. The words 'and
lot were III the deed but not in tho
record. They We're, however. in the
t general description of the premises
and the particular description of tn,
: south line Of Aliens purchase wa,
not varied by them. The court de
a cidCd that these words could max,
:. no difference in the meaning Of the
g description, and oycnulcd the mo
!. ton. Exceptions ny dit Farnhan
II for plf. and Clarke for dit.
| No. 50, VIM. +. Downing VS.. Tow
II of Orange, tried by Jury with Nel
+. diet for plf., and diff. moved to Sc
, aside verdict rs not in accordanr
e with the testimony. Motion over
ruled. White and RoWell for plf-
!. Dickey for diff.
\, - r.u.n - r.,;..
1t -, - '''''''
q Chester y. Bass. This was a pet
# ton to compe. dit. To contribute +
i the support of his father. It ap
= ppared tLot dft had hoon dcsorio,
u .','..r..,
II - US - '''','' we" ,.I a., i"''I''' "i'
4 ,''''' y. ''V, = WV H''S ,H''H Wv Ut
>, ~" S"llp't va c""."',o', WHY
LIN '''.' 'n''' VIZ '''" "'""l . i''.
"''" 'i''ic TO Get aIo'iE' JUG
{. W s,' 'o"'t ''i'V ut Huo"'' pay PI
d 50 J." W. gay : ana 'i''' ncI'her 'a'
, - H"Vu'" 'V,oN q ,oS'S' ho"t'l ~
pa hcp"I" ior oiI'
No. ~, AiuHah spear vs.. II
VI ''''''. It, 'ia'','cu an appeal ifo'
Il ooii''''SS'oi'tra when "lt' sald WA
IS ,"'o' ,''"', Ai'tt"I "L'oNco' iItnal
"a. ~, W. 'o"cli ana i,'IiIh lor dlt.
;, Az" "N, '''i'u'I . h"uGoF vs.. Jon
III D. W oo"N''io ana others Inns wa
$. an '''loi' Tor IaISe Imprisonment
g olo"En' ny PI'' o" account oil hi
n "'''o' vi ''nli'ld'I, Ioi "r',nhehneS
~ N"S"s' ioV'' pIl y. pieaued !
i"S'',ca'ioi' the lac'S that pit wa
III legally complained ct, was artcStc
uN Nlt, hiss rs constable, ON Il wal