, 1870-08-01


Patrick Egan :. Benjamin Bennett Action Of
. tecover 'or an alleged assault and bat
ieclares lhns he Was forciDlJ encountered, and
lat IN the melee he lest dlrera IarSc i
quantities Of hntr from on bis head
Superior Court.
WHEN WIDOW MAY r. nnwEu1yss-
Theresa Ia Framboise :. Nathan Grow. This ! r
was one VI the almost countless kuts u1 stss Ia
Ft1mbuse tor assignment OF dover. Mrs.. L.
Frambose was the wife OF 4 certain lnlian or half
t,eve4. She nov ilsrs IN Kausas- The property
lnrol.ed Ia the present case and those which were
Of at least the assessed value Of 9Sb2ooo IN this
the w.dow does ncs take share, undss the fellow
This Ia petition for dover. Beside the case / :
whose tt!e haze gtven there at Rotce statF otn-
IL ,so as e s a!e nsy i
and u they all relate 10 property OF which the
title Is the same, hy stipulation are 10 be tried 70
Etlher, md Whatever Judgment Is rendered IN one !
ii to bt rendered III ali Of them
The facts upon which the petitions , we're ls. nlei
r. !ha o r aSSt he H. 1ssa ~ q ~ 1ans r..
plRlna1t claimed to have 1ostiog right Of pre- |
empuon eunthn9 hun to locsie aud purchase q
as government pt.ee. Before actual u.
t.y and purchase at The Land Once. BY.
Ea Vie" m 11 ~ enl Yr 81 ne nna ns
d kinzle, whereby they were to furnlsh the money
TO y! tsI ne eighty assss ana i9r , tatt mrSnss,
hotse when he should secure hla patent 1mne-
dIately sueescLIuS this agreement Ia Pf7mbotse |
the @ sass hsf % Il lie southeast quarter 81 Section
1s -. 10. Of which the 1aud Ia question u the
.nutt forty acrts and Walker Ktnze furnished
| TIE money {al00} to pay The government price. A
| certificate wns then issued In the nsfne Of L. |
FTamtoise, and delivered to Walker on the lsth OF
June, 1885: about the same time La Framboise. By
| q deed Of war7anty, conveyed the half OF the |
land agreed upon to walker kinze, his WIZ aos |
issued for lhe whole eighty acres, In tho name Of |
| IL Framboise. Is patented aud prs-emptor. The |
! defendants hold title bY conveyance under and I
In 1867 Joseph La FJambolse dIcs,, and. Ia 1868,
the complainant lied her peiltious syalnst these
couyeysl nJ her husband 10 Walker i Klnzle In
1863 after the cakes II issue, the defendants
ettalnei release from the complainant Of all her
| ID Dar-&he pies Of release being made by cross.
lii agrerably 10 the practice Of courts OF equity
Tbs question taIseti UPON taess facts Is, whether
3Irs Il Frsm1o.se Is entitled or not to 1uwee IN
these p,etnisea On the argument much palms
was taken o. counsel 10 'fgtermine p1SGtsey tns
Ktu.ie to ,hc land III question, under ,neir con-
tract with L. Frambose or resulting from tue
may not he Necessary to pursue this inquiry. 1t fur
uishes as convcneut 1arae by ascestA:hlns the
cr ~ any u1hcr at.d shall therefore, enter upon
It h.,rny.
The agreement letxeen nc parties; o.. u tne
inss u Walker < Kthzte with Ia teainbotse, II
| censhseted sloMes would 1ustt!E the Court IN mud.
noMoW.r msgf etn"sc are r.sn,tipr rus; IL oWnersetn
in eauIfy and The wife OF the rratui our trust mr.
that OF the TRUSTEE, would be dowablc thereof.
, ! Walker i ksn1ie furnished la FEAnheIse with
money, which he Invested IN eighty acres Of laud
thus as Inc authorities 10 th4s State clearly es.
:,.n ali the con,fions ucccasafy to raise result.
" l,lE rus: - ,,o ,-,,.,, =, ,,a ,,o,s,
'es Its ,ns 1ass eoa a.s % 9 he trust III;
sIso no,t.r a, sxnTt:ss srraunescut oetween The
7 ra1tsex They agreed that what vas done should
+ ie lonc. air, That La Ffanhotse should taIc tAt
: arniust WnErr K,nzIe. Inc trust 90 cecatcd b.
= ;aW. As Walker < Kins,e paii the entire paf!
"hrs nnny Illr rcsu!tiur tr1,s vas of the wuol,
sirnJy aervs, IL agreerent, however. afterwar1
;ss Ssti Z nsas rsss ST; T. s as9ss
Frauhotse to Ecc}, the re,nsi1~- .,r-r IN sui,sIj
ciut"n ii his tna ,iI,:s = aIktf ( Kinzie. ,hrouS
~ ,Gn1n 81 Iess n-ica INN II Wss rsnTsh thaf i
~ for 9hr sasetninr s nes esn Il was
" hn DO nj rh,nt thia fsef horerer. sfsn1ares tn
Wr.,Is, - r.ss,,,tt.,r' ,.us+ ,.t,r.A.r ~. ~
I'LL eithvch tf,c nsmi;,Hr rms, II "f M D n,1r
;r ;;snd. wss oi ,nc eittrc tract: 5ct 81 coaset
~ bai atT ~ lie traet ''sn' ~ Aaa u 'A' VI
T. Auoilsr view would be tna, there was ,esu1
ing trust OF each Of The two parties, and that Il
pt pnc ii Ih.m. N'"7 - 'D'' - >>4aAN1s 0s''44
lis sciiic,i, however, that the fact ,nat the
non vss contras swst.tt tt, nsrtes nrny,t1Iuu I,
o1 rhe SAM. ,lIsnnsltion nf hr iani ntTch All IN
The law would make. taking accouot ouly Of Il
tart ~ ,he nsxnrnt ~ 1hc Fnnn"r Iv 1nr one A.
Gu The takiug OF the tie hf auutucr say that ID
the s.ct viii not nr,rent IN; rastnT f III. r.sftt,
aph trust. II Vas arrurJ, ~ / understood col,us,
,r that If ther. was contract between the paf1tt
w the rcs1,Ifiny trust could not t-e, This, hoHevt
'er, seer,a,njy not tbe case. In several csses ii
erv @ 90 a.nt..1 ~. I,,,,tc s.,1'n fhaf nrhr1
-. seiy s"y 49, NtnJ ~ ~, IL -sfac ninra m
- su1 n4sfpcntt-a contract--sflu tae fact il
rnnrrsct viii nor nr1.vrnt TIM r.,
Tain thete - . y -, ~" ., ~. ~ ,n ~ @
INF Ing OF tha! tfust. II the iafts ehs, ra.Sa w
antioE'ze tne coult 70 p ..t T. 'e ~ aCr
an aeseeIntnt: as y, , n 1r ,hs ~ ,ts'
au1- neatt :, .. lau INV tA~' ~
I'LL eAs oMM as. . ,h..,x.. .s.., ..u.. n,.,o ~
rad would scc1n- thete!ofr tnesc facts a!ohe &C
-. 6hcfed, {hdt mere was resulting tfusS, and &C
-, tSAuena!. ~ tVrSt. ..- . .,,,,..,.,.
tar There is IN the caset however. cifcumssan
:dV tnat tNs sooE.uso. ~ ."ua .,, ~ M
rom the act OF CONGRESS g1sng inc ftghl Of pseen
~. o ton claimed by In FInmbolse, the claimant y
ata absolutely proh,bted from assigning his preen
Of tou ftsht IN anticipation 81 purchasing his past
mp therefor anu az saSn ; assignment M Was es,, y
,r Lote on Illus WORK On Trustees The annota
says: HThert - another exception 10 the 1Ocsr
j1s- stated III Inc te4I Of resulting H1st ~ IaFof
the | purchHftf who tays the money anu t1Ses
lost results from principle OF public policy; and
heir exception Is thai courts OF equity VIII never "a
he'd [ resulting trust where It would contravene {
the suitable provisions o. the State or would assist
with parties tn evaasine th'se rfnvfslons- Thus,
rart aien, ,os ne f =. aay NV piu. ~
lors Hing foleSnefs tfoM holding feai esAte. sno
next purchase land nay the Innpey Tor It, anu take
conve, ancc In the name OF rnlrl person. with
u on Any ntltl1A Aasu ~ Iuse. .csu..At :.
! would never be faissh Or enforced Ia chahees!
mere ath " - , ~ r. IT, S.sV 81 ~ InnI " '"e e