The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1870-10-01
COURT or APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

A List Of the First Hundred Causes ON the
Calendar Of tho Coars Of Appeals for ths
Term Of the Court to Commence ON tho
second Tuesday OF October, 1870.
Preferred Cttlendar-Class No. LII Kncker-
booker vs.. The People; 2, Hand vs.. he People; 8,
Remsen and another VIZ. The People; A, The People
vs.. Bradley; 5, The People VS.. McDonald; 8, The
People VS.. Allen.
FrcJe,rsd 0alsnaar-c1ass No. az, Walsh vs..
Powers; s, Freeman vs. PREGNANT o. Raymond w.
Watson; TO- Grippen VS.. The New York Central Rail-
road Company; IL. Morgan ct al, va Skidmore; IL;
Morgan Ct al. Va Skiimore; ls, Adams ct al w.
Perry ct al; II, Van ripper and another VS.. Poppen.
husen CT al; 10, O'Hara VS.. O'Hara; ID.
shepard SnH, vs. saes,s; T. ssumMay vs. shum-
rup vs.. The Railway p. & A. Company.
20. Lansing W. Bain; ~ Cochran VS. Ingersoil; 2s,
Gilman w. McAllan; 20. Tallmadge vs.. Walsworth,
Dlllaye VS.. Groenough; 81 Cottle vs. Vanderheyden;
~ Maurice et al; vs.. Maurice o. al; 90 Maurice ct
VI, smith VS.. Maurice ct al; 80, Chamberlain vs..
chamberlain; 90. Chamberlain CT al. vs. Chamber
Jam at -, Eager rs. Lansing 30, Abbott vs. ods;
81 chamberlain w. ihadley 80, In the matter Of
William ). Blodgett; 40, Burrlll vs. Boardman.
= I1'g@Ted Cdte'tad,--Ctass No. Ill. Mcneil w.
Tenth Tenth National Bank; AZ, The People, &C., vs..
Miller ct al; 4s, Tho People, ex rel Lee, vs..
Board of Supervisors OF ohautauqua county
~, Parmenter vs. Roth and anolaor: As, Psrmen-
ter VS.. Roth; 40, In The matter or Dun receiver &C.
:, Genera CdleaGar.--i7, Conger VI. Dougherty; 4s,
Belslegel Vs. The New York Central Railroad Com
pany; 90, Hamilton Gridley 81, Smith vs. Miller
OF al; 81, 0Neil VIZ. James; SO, Aus,lnsvs New Jer.
sey Steamboat Company; 81, Stcinwig Vi. The Eric
hallway Company; S. The First National Bank OF
Flshkil vs. Shutter; SO, skinner vs. Qun; 81, First
Society Methodist Episcopal church OF Q. ana s. vs.
osborne; IS, Brown vs.. Brnkerhon; 80, Sheldon vs.
Horton and another; 60, Woods Vs. Wider; 81
Burke VS. Valentine; GO, Meyervs. CLARK; 6s, Clinton
Va Hope Insurance Company; 81, AtCheson VS.
Mallen; Us, Morrow vs.. The Hudson River Railroad
Company: Go. Hayens Vs. Patterson; 81, Carl vs.
Sponord; SO, Kirby vs.. DAILY; %, Sherman vs.
Postley; 20, Claim vs.. Ball; H. Roberts vs.. Fisher
T. The Glenyilie Wooden Company vs.. cameron
70. The Chenille Wooen Company w. Ripley; "a
Gibson VS.. Bates; 49, Clarity W. nanes; 76 Berger
III, Whitaker; II, Wright vs.. Miller e; Eans Q
Commonwealth VS.. Mayor, i,a; 70, Oyering Vi
e2, Bliss vs. Mat,eson; SO, The Birmingham Jrol
Foundry vs. Had1eld; "a, Waterman VS.. Van Every
20, Mailman vs. Society or Conoord; 80, Coster W
Mayor &c, OF Albany, 81. Whubeck w. Holland
IS, Patten w. Still; 80, First National Bank OF Cort
land vs.. Green; 90, Becker vs.. Missner 81, Chalmers
vs. Wright; ga C'Berlne w. Lloyd 93, Dillon VS.
Anderson: Oh, The Chicago and Great Western Rail
: road Company w. Dane; 95 Hodges Va. Cooper; e6
Phillips Vs. Campbell; 81, kecklow vs.. Schenck 9s
Baker VS.. Union Mutull Lie Insurance Company
90, Arnold vs.. Burne; 100, Union National Bank .
Troy VS.. sixth ational Bank OF New FORK.
E. o. PERRIN, Clerk.