The spirit of democracy. [volume] (Woodsfield, Ohio) 1844-1994, 1870-05-10
Pr0ceedingso Of the Common Pleas
Court. April Term, 1870.

Proceelingsof the Common Pleas
Court. April Term, 1870.
Court began April II, 1870, and con.
tinucd TO April 80: JOHN S. WAY on the
bench.
Potts vs. Potts ct AL Partition; pro-
ceedings and sale confirmed.
Franks VS.. Young. Civil action; dis
missed at costs Of plaintiff.
4 Carpenter vs.. Pryor Appeal; dis
missed at costs of plaintiff.
Stephens VS.. Scofeld. Judgment
revived.
Boughner VS.. Conger ct al. Partition
ordered; taken at appraisement by NJ
Boushner proceedings confirmed.
Snively VS. Brookover. Judgment re-
vived against executor of defendant.
Williams & West vs. Brookover. Sale
confirmed.
Parker VS.. Coen ct al. Partition or
dered sale ordered
Davenport vs. Phillips. Partition Or
dered; taken by plaintiff; proceedings
confirmed.
Rice vs.. Bennett ct al. Partition or
dercd; taken by plaintiff; proceedings
confirmed
Beardmore VS. Cline ct al. Partition
ordered.
Black vs.. Wright. Partition; sale
confirmed.
Woods vs.. NJ. c. r. R. Co. Sale con-
frmed
Ohio VS.. Geo. Kastner. Assault and
battery; recognized in $l0O to next
term.
The Grand Jury returned bill of in
dictment against Isaac Booth for BUR
glary against David +. Suter, Christian
Dresel and Jacob Rose for selling liquor
to be drank where sold, and against Da-
vld Hines and James Fulton for horse
stealing.
McCandless d Co. VS. Knight. Judg-
ment BY default for S209 25.
Spriggs VS.. Amos US Ex'r ct al Judg-
ment by default against defendant Wi
ley for l73 9S.
Miller VS.. Miller ct al. Partition or
dered.
Headley vs. Conger ct al. Judgment
by default for S151 90.
Okey vs. Thomas. Judgment revived.
Long l. Co. VS.. Wehr. Sale confirm
cd.
Armstrong VS. Taylor ct al. Decree
quieting plaintiff title.
Fords VS.. Thomas. Judgment revived.
Genin VS.. Uselton. Sale confirmed
Ohio vs. Fouty and Wright. Fouty
found guilty of petit larceny; Wright
recognized in 500 to next term.
Ohio VS.. Kincade Peace warrant ;
defendant recognized to next term.
Ohio VS.. Shriver and Swearingcn.
Charge petit larceny; defendant Swear
ingen tried, and found not guilty ;indict-
ment nollied as to defendant Shriver.
Miller vs. Thornaerry. Appeal; dis
missed at costs of plaintiff
| Earlewine vs. Earlewins ct al. Parti-
ton ordered.
Hill VS.. Hill. Decree establishing
will, and quictiug plaintiffs title.
Lincart vs.. Suter. Decree quieting
plaintiffs title.
Carrothers vs.. Albert Judgment by
default for 1920 IS.
Walter VS.. Albert. Judgment by de
fault for 1912 81.
Beiser vs. Albert. Judgment by de-
fault for S1265 co.
Salisbury VS.. Wilson. Repleyin; dis
missed.
Davenport VS.. Andrews. Judgment
by default for 1922 II.
Veazy, Forbes 4 Co. VS.. Wells ct al.
Judgment BY default for $l34 95.
Moose VS.. Walton. Decree for 1884
II, and foreclosure.
Genin VS. E. Williamson ct al. De
cree for plaintiff for S143 SO, and for
Anthony Shuts S351 IS and foreclosure.
Barnhard VS.. Smith. Decree for 1896
so and foreclosure.
Ferry license granted to Mrs. Tuel
| McIlvain vs. jackson ct al. Decree
in favor of plaintiff for 1891 80, in "a
vor of R. N. Wells for $4,000 Sc snl in
favor of H. B. May for $3.50 33.
Davenport vs.. Barrackman. Judg-
ment by default for S21S %.
Davenport VS.. Truck. Judgment by
default for $3f5 IS.
Kanzig VS.. Kanzig Judgment by de
fault for $5l3 10.
Genin VS.. j. McMahon. Sale con
firmed
Lindamood VS., Midkuff ct al Decree
in favor OF G.. W. Mason for $174 81
and in favor Of VIM. Bittner for S276 il
and foreclosure.
Steed VS.. Grant. Decree for S470 6G
and foreclosure.
Mosser VS.. Hunter ct al. judgment
by default for 1921 90 and for sale Of at
tachcd property.
Mcllott VS.. Mellott. Judgment by de-
fault for S3ll 90 and 500 II costs.
Wiley VS.. NIellott. Judgment oy de-
fault for SS7 2S.
Suppes vs. Mellott. Judgment by de
fault for S51 80.
Penn vs.. Garrett. Receiver ordered
to pay over to Clerk.
Ohio VS.. Jacob Rose. Indictment for
selling liquor to be drank where sold
plea gui ty ine $40 and costs
Ohio vs. Christian Dressed. Same as
above.
Ohio VS.. Jacob Schneider; same as
above.
Ohio VS.. Isaac Booth. Tried and
found guilty cf burglary; sentenced te
penitentiary for seven years.
Jordan VS.. Gibbons. Decree for SIS!
% and foreclosure.
Special Grand Jury reported two bills
OF indictment against Elson Hyssom fol
assault with intent to commit rape, an6
one indictment VS. Jacob Schneider fol
selling liquor to be drank where sold.
Ohio vs.. David c. Hines. Recogni
zance in sum of $500 on charge of horse
stealing forfeited, aud motion to respite
continued.
Acklcy VS.. Bever Dismissed at costs
of plaintiff.
Adams VS. Cox. Sale confirmed.
Ohio VS.. Elson Hyssom. Indictment
for assault with intent to commit rape