The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-05-05

/
Of the wife alone' If she undertook 70 do that she
toll nsr was iaie enc earnotnow say she was nl9led
could nave been sued upon tins ie'tcr, and
"I.9 qpcr her Letters They could have both have been
nr he facts would have ADVISED hin to sex redTes.
lis vile. They can be sued upon those letters now
Judge nacteu said the defence mad been permit.
these iettets and commenting upon them to show
that a conspiracy was carried for the purpose Of
alternating Mrs Mcfarland from her husband and "
Was certainly competent now for the prosecution to
show, by way OF rebuItal, that no such conspiracy
existed; The question NAY DC asked. ,.,,..,,.,
Q-Were you aware before Ieceiyng tnst let,er that
MIS- nv, mef "and heendeo !" leave ne' Hu'o'"''
va az hn' 'o''er '"oh ''ouE"' ''"' "'"
o-in all that you did for Mrs, Mcfarland and her
family, by what motives were you actuatej7 Al
did so knowing their extrenle poverty. -,
onHad you any design or ntenuon hw nhv55 IN
Never Never n'' WI '"' pun ''' W
think i wa. 0 ON the hes sti Of March,
long da she sI'i rOur or
nys days. 80.
AL don't KNOW = few days. -, -. :, -
ASity s,rsssS lido 70, know
rna FIRST snoorrSo
6@when did you come homer Al came home
m Sniwnas da'e VI" th"r Alt was THURSDAY
togo g her psrentsa kI,Yes, 81,
"a the carr iaGe with her? Ayes. SIR.
Wwhhs.e wa, Ale was TN. my hSS, 3,
vsk hat day fop he afst time 'u'' w
Qw@ that the nrst day he had been ont Of his bed1
o-was he able TO get down stairs7
MI uerry-h TINS nady surgical ehper'T
The question was excluded.
t,emcn pa's-ina' sii iou can cro''eAamine' gen
THE cRoss-ExAnSArIoS.
OF Mr.. Sinclair dead silence feiI upon he audi
snee and a. as tic inSSi,iton grew more and more
sreS the e1SSsr o IN, ss
husband, stood under the window behind the jurors,
90sn hazard and PALE @ as Re would
thts Vide re,cbjng snd ronnta,ion dsatroyinS case
Mr. Graham began in ,nis wise:
.o-uow long did you. know Richardson before his
o@where aid you make his scqasn,ancep A-At
~ gEEsS came .l he to be .nero' Ale was invited
was R s.' Mcfarland there on that oeciOn' A.
tns' A. An aware "a .nnno..,
tinE t,sS ne s ,nv av NJ ,vaying hs,hsr ,o .nov
Mis-. McF ariand before t6nt3 Al have.
sir -Ano you 'uoE0 nc oiu not A"0s nef A'-ie'
you read TINS intercepted letter In which ne
'pea'S Vi ''ii'
for v,or, h,-lh.ys.
NJ ra 4. nothiny of tho rtna I'm tho ,.,,o,
III W notns VI 'he hino IN the ie'ter'
Mr. sn si read from the intercepted letter
as follows;
in dSy or weeS Pse rees Weh grow n ANY spne
MONDAY hour, but for ali ne oniy ONE love ever
grew 50 slowly INTO ny heart as yours has and that
i, Ny dsriine you are all would have you. e1acig
my. tired heart nnds In You INNATE rest and riches
s fa s~'e'he''' oo0o night my love- my own my
Q-Now, whcn did you nrst this intercepted let.
s heard Of sSaS s. iss &s
A:-No, SIR, never.
tel you what ]. coatsiasd N.,S9 ss; DIV a'''i
March, ISL 70 the ssS Of SovsmSsr SO was Ia isao
II we en mss ' were h:y toasss a.
h9ase VA, A,.0ncss .r,,, .. ,r,o "a ,sc,
Swss tsas the xs Of pY DE- Ward a.
On Forts.sikth street "''o' A'eA
cc CMhere did you i've at that tmeP AIN Forty
e.Sere they never together at your house by in.
n ri,sn e " -, A'e"' 1871 '"e o"S 'ha' ie"er
ot69g invited e9,h % then on the occasion you
Q-were they invited vita a view OF having then,
both there tosether2 A.-No siri and neither knew
ths othsI was oom ns rs.,
MI eTahan ~harpy)-Thats 81,
Way IMPROPER, MRS. SINCLAIR.
know that neither knaw the other W
comingY Al knew N ihfongh mn nnsbend w.
Q-Sou are perfectly certain that was the only occa
sion they were ever al your house togetherP XSTer
fectly;
Q-lonr husband never told you the contents OF that
intercepted letter. Ale spoke OF IL, but never told
oHIf vow had known what WAS I'm tha, le,,er whom
tley came 10 your house 10 June 1851 would you have
received them into your houseP A
WOULD. sESsATIos.1
OH you had known all the contents Of that letter
you gd have allowed them 70 pe invited to be there
toietherH Al Nouid lsehsa1lon and expressions OF
Q-rhen we are 20 understand TINT, according 60
your understanding OF ethics md Droprety, you would
have seen nothing In thu, letter to cause you dscoun.
touance she associations that existed between Mr. Rich
ardsQn and MTs. hcFarland2 A.-Nothing, us under
stood them.
Q.-pld you think he was proper man TO he re-
ceVed into your house, when In ts letter he had de-
clared his disregard for public tentiment1 DID you
respect for public opinion? Al considered
me- N'N"N"DS'N 'hNi fH"rh" rhHsoN
10 visit any family different constructions may be
put upon his words In that letter.
Q-,Do YOU consider him a proper person 70 he Adj
united INTO your house. amer having cxpressea hs
To- nm ana o ea Yin ~ ~, au ns
he d'dIn tbT' insSr N ''N"s Va "S " "'i'"SA'H m
Mr DAVIS Counsel is not basng his questions on the
letter but noon nis Nor yerslon 81 - f' VI '"D
Tne The al,y stys sbe h.s r.,d IN. ,e,,sr
MIR Days-1hers ~ n1ihi',S ~ thc nd IN the i,t,.r
as he sfat,s ue lows nc snn,ts az as hs NJ sssab