Vicksburg weekly herald., 1870-02-12

ISSUE DoeAtN Wla ealAe0f ana tue
following orders and judgments
taken.
No5 James Allen and wife aud
Charles B Allen vs J. CassbOlt,
PLAINTIFF dismissed this suit at
their cost.
No low. c. Renigen & Co. vs
Moray & Wolf, plaintiffs dismiss
ed this suit at their cost.
Noll Stephen Wilder vs j. L.
Vegleson, James Murray aud A. G.
Thompson, plaintiff dismissed this
suit at his costs.
No 10 ]. w. Beale vsJames Allen
aud wife and Fannie Allen. Death OF
defendant, James Allen, suggested,
and admitted and continued for
revivOr, against Charles d Allen
his administrator and sci IA ordered
No l6. Langsdorf and Rowen-
stein, VS. Benjamin + Bowling
rule for cost, absolute,
No %. Caroline V Winn, VS. w
II Smith ct al, plaintiff dismissed
this suit at his cost.
No % VIM II Peek, vs. W II
Smith ct al, plaintiff dismissed this
suit at his cost.
No ~ A j & NJ a Gibbs, Y,
VIM Ii Smith ct al, rule fjr cost.
absolute.
No Al. John A Kline, vs. w d
Miller (D), aud J W NJ Harris and
W 8 Lum, Gar, plaintiff dismissed
this suit at his cost.
No 45. Wm f Walker and wife,
VS. James Z Harris, plaintiff dis
missed this suit at his cost.
No 50. Catehings, and PORT cr-
use sc, VS. NJ A Showers, defend
ant dismissed this suit at his cost.
No GO. Washington a IIender-
son VS. Sherrard iigby Il Go. jury
and verdict for plaintiff for SIGj 3j.
No go. J r Cook vs. 4 J Fletcher,
dismissed by plaintiff at his cost.
No rs. Edward 5 Jalfray & Co.
VS. Levy and Stien, rule for cost ab.
solute.
No H. Joel II. Willis VS. George
Markham, death of plainiiiT sng.
gcsted and admitted, aud revived in
name Of Bette WIFI, Admins.
tratriX. and cause continued.
No rs. Joel II Willis VS. Mary
Downs, death Of plaintiff suggcs.
ted Gnd admitted, and revived in
name of Bette Willis, Adminlstra.
lriX, and cause continued.
No 81. N 5 Mepham ~ Bro vs.
b + Bowling, rule for cost abso-
lutte.
No 50. Max Kunor VS. Mary J
Smith, death of defendant suggest
cd and admitted, aud continued for
revival against her personal repre-
sentative when known.
No 30. Thomas J Finney VS. Ma
ry j Smith; death OF defendant
suggested and admitted, and con-
tinued for revivor against her per-
sonal representative when known.
No 93, + II Andrews vs. Robert
Price; death of defendant suggest.
ed and admitted. and continued for
revivor against Ann Reid, his ad-
ministratrix, and sci ia awarded.
No 9S: s Rothschilds VS. Charles
+ JOuberi, ,defendant,) and Lease,
Thompson y Co, garnashee dis.
missed by plaintiff at his cost.
No l0l. National Bank of ViCks-
burg VS. J A Hawley; dismissed by
plaintiff at bis cost.
No l02. Meyer g. Kahn VS. J A
Hawley; dismissed by plaintiff at
bis cost.
No LOG. Morgan, Ross s. Co VS.
W II Fox; alias summons against
defendant, and case continued.
No los. Bowling, Clark Il Co VS.
Henry Barker, (defendahl.) and A
II Arthur, garnashee.
No ll3. VIM D Sloan vs Charles
A MOntrOss, death of plaintiff sug-
gesied and admitted, and revived
In the name OF Simon Suydam, his
administrator, and continued.
No ll5. Rose Austin VS. National
Bank of YiCksburg, IL Kiersky
and James Ware, garnashce bank
ruptcy OF garnishee, Kiersky sug-
gested admitted and continued for
revivor against assignee, when
known.
No ll9. James p Haigh VS. Ben
Cook, master and owner Of steam.
boat Cairo Belle; dismissed by
plaintiff at his cost.
No l27. Henry Fox Il Co. vs.
Simon Stein; dismissed by delcn.
dant at his cost.
No 1872. L S JaiTreys & Co. vs. S
Stein, dismissed by defendant at
his cost.
No l33. RoSenthall, Shrek Il Co.
VS. S. Stein, dismissed by defen.
dant at his cost.
No 1876. Jacob and Volney Vough
VS. Charles Anderson; defendants
counsel suggested death Of defcn.
dant, suggestion admitted aud con-
tinued for revivOr in name of per-
sOnal representative when known
and plaintiffs except.
No l3l. Klefer Brothers VS. Tel.
ler & Dryfus, sci ia, to revive
against e X Birchett, assignee OF
defendants and continued.
No 1877. James B. Baily VS. Mil
lard " Gavigan, dislnis sed by plain
tiif at his cost.
NoIll Lewis Loyens, VS. J A
Brown, plaintiff called and non
suited.
No l43. Fred Ackerman VS. j I
SOulhwell, dismissed by consent
Of defendant at his cost.
No III. Thomas Nichols vs. Lewis
Leyens, plaintiff called and non
suited.
No I52. Geo Rosser VS. Jacob
Steiner ct al, dismissed as to dc.
fendant. O Bush0ain and iury and