The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-01-15
SECOND TRIAL FOR PERRY
DISCHARGE or THE JURY Agrrn
SEVEN AND 4 mar HOURS

49,. ,....
i,,u,,,ioi ,,,r ,'oa ',.,, Wv nc'nitai
puss,tiI,ty Of Are, mrnt-I,crrv t,No
cd TO the Raymond street Jnil
The interest IN the case Of Edwin pc,r -,
has been or trial since Tuesday last, In ttc ca.
q yer and Terminer. proo, M. Tor tho ,,,.,,.O..
Thomas Hayes. q pigIt Waterman a, uorho.,,.
stores Furman street continued unab,,ci -
day. The announcement thu, Jndfc Pratt, ,nn,.
deliver the charge 10 ~ Jury a, tic openlrv ., a..
Cuurt had the eject Of Increasing the cro,rI 49,
tbroneed the cour, room and Lotto rcd abou mo a..
frances and corridors of the Court IIeuse an,,,.
trial. 70 chat loug before 10 O'Clock the door. -
bcs,ccos nv n, eoger m,.s and tho &C.,. ~
-, - 80 Wv se'nes OF dis
trial were rodnscled.
,r,o, ,,,-,, ,..o,
,-,,,, .o..~,,.-
an. - m. ...,,,,.,., a.. - ."aised
sn, s,r,.,nv aOr ,ho t,,',,. ~ ~ o',u'ns
oero with their verdict II waa p,oc.s,r, ,,., A..
o,,,rn,,.r, .h,niI r,y. ,n. or.rc. =. ot.'s WV
yond n rational coubt in order to a conviction
Of cap,,o, crime I'm, oouyIe,iop con,l no c,.a,s
upon circumstartiai evid'n or where II was purity
circumstantihl and partly positive The ratlon,,
duOt was doubt witch, after the 'ul cOn''d,raaou
OF al the circumstances ~ TN case eii the mind 10
such state thu, moral certainty wna fel, tlat tha
IA fnr ,I,, tr,v
~. -, 1aa,,,,a, Of A., ,,.,r,o tho ,oonoo an. a,
ue' N""' uonui"on w '"V Wv Ou'"', '''',
they found that the prisoner Killed Haycs. In order
10 make ont case they sh.uId feel satisfied that n.
I'm, IT.. -, . ,,.,,oA,,.,oA d..,.n IN ,.l. A.,
a,'' ,,"'e w" " VI, - w
lie or that OF some 'ther human oeine' Frst The
Jury we're 10 determine whetner the prison "a Killed
r.. 49,, =, .-.,,,.
haSes' "nu h'A" l" se''e
WHETHER THE ACT WAS PREHFDiTATEn
rr,bo,, ,.. s,o,c,,r, ,root IN ro,.e nm Tho r,,,.
n.'o w, su' .,oO W y, NV Wv nlnu'
CHARGED ,,c nr,.ons, xvD. en,,lca 70 q. bpnes, n
"Leu' Wv P''s""'r ""s e'"''u" '" W. o'"7"'
vas for them to say whether there was any evidence
showing INSANITY or that the prisoner was lnborna
unu,, "s,,', ,. ue,'s ,,iop w, a., ~ w W.
thcir nndinv ih,t lie T,sor"r Killed Have. M
testimony had shown ,hnt, Just rr'or 70 To killing
and few moments alter, The prlson.. ""re evident
marks of beng
UNDER THE INFLUENCE or IIouop.
"
N2u"mry y 'oAHntl"n forms no eNcuse " In
mnnily for crime, and II INC lury lound mat tue
priSoner willuIlv &c, bere'ry, nho WIN piomeiai.
whether be was drunk or sober The cvidenee q,
intoSicaiion. how ever, might be considered IN
ncction With MI tic Other facts In determining
whether the prisoner killed Hayes with prcmcdltat
cd design. The jury may MD one Of three YER
Diets: First, murder IN the btst degree; second,
mnnslduy'ter In the third decree third, acquiftaL
To convict the prisoner ~ mln'lAu otter. thew
must find that the prisoner Kidd Hayes In the hest
Of passion with the design to eject death. Wills
no MOTIVE SHOWN N TINS CASE,
4, was unnecessarv for the Covcrnmen, q, ,-o,s ,v
noStir" ayISonao 81 ~ ,o ' ~ w. 10y
pusus ov'u ef VIC .Ms.euee 81 n9bss Ihs
me- =, vas not 70 he t.t,r - VIC, 81 a. mi, ~
the s,a,emont az acnnst The nr,.oner I'm, n,s AZ :.
clrrnmstante bearlng unon the Incl on the shoot,.
Inc truth NJ vb,rh tho jn,v had r,rt, 10 nee r
80 49,. " ".." .,v ~ 800, 'is. , W. ~ uEn
Tnn,, dc.n.s "a "s"s, e', a., u1',i w
sDcncer IN ,ec, ,h, ,he on,y moo, n ,Se a,u