Staunton spectator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1896, 1870-03-29
1T1HIS Is no NOTIFY ALI Persons

forward and square up. $3.50. ..
mar22-5t 'SPITLER & UTLEY.
ITVHIS Is no NOTIFY ALL Persons
indebted to US by note or account, that after the
1st of April our claims will be found in the hands
of G.. NJ Cochran, Jr.
The problem of paying cash and selling on
credit is one which we find it impossible to solve
mara2~at PARKINs, NELSON s. co.
VIRGINIA AT rules held in the Clerk
' Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty, the 7th day of March, 1870 Samuel Shack
lett in his right, and as sole surviving part
ner of the late partnership concern of Shacklett
& Brufy, composed of himself and George Br9f-
Samuel Hildebrand, Jacob R Hildebrand as
executor Of Michael Hildebrand, ST., decd, and
in his own right; John Hildebrand, David Hill
debrand, Henry Hildebrand, Gabriel Hide
brand Abraham Hildebrand, B. F. Hildebrand,
admir- of Michael Hildebrand, Jr., decd; Mar
tina Miller, John Haney, and Peggy, his wife;
Jacob r. Hildebrand, trustee for said Peggy
beth, and William Haney-and said John Ha-
ney, Daniel Haney, Elizabeth Haney, and Will
liam Haney in their own right,-.,.:. Defendants.
The object Of this suit is to attach any interest
to which the nonresident defendant, Samuel
Hildebrand may be entitled, in the real and per-
sonal estate of his father Michael Hildebrand,
ST., decd in the hands of Jacob Z. Hildebrand
his executor and in the real or personal estate of
Michael Hildebrand, Jr., decd in the hands of
of B. F. Hidebrand, his admir-; and especially
the interest of said Samuel Aildebrand in a tract
of land situate in Augusta county, supposed to
contain about 40 acres of which said Michael
Hildebrand. Jr,, died sliced and possessed, end
which was devised to him by the 3rd clause of
the will of Michael Hildebrand ST., decd,
of record in the County Court of Augusta,
Will Book No. Al, page 498 suficency
thereof to satisfy to the plaintiff the of $1O5.
81, with interest thereon from the 3rd day of
March, 1852, and the costs of this proceeding.
The defendant Henry Hildebrand not having
entered his appearance and it appearing by sat
isfactory evidence that he is not resident of this
Commonwealth: 1t is ordered that he do appear
here within one month after due publication of
this notice and do what is necessary to protect
i's 'i''i'9'' J. n. RYAN, D. G.
SMITH 81 ELDER, p. q. mar15-4w
VIRGINIA AT rules held in the Clerks
Y office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty, the It'll day of March, 1870,
Jacob Crist and John w. Dickerson, Plaintiffs,
3ossfa -e AGAINST
Jacob S. Swink. administrator of Jacob Ewing,
decd, Catharine Ewing, widow of said dece-
dent, James Ewing, Elizabeth Ell. Hahn, B. j.
Mason, and Rebecca, his wife, George Conner
and Susan his wife, Eliza Ewing - Ewing,
and JACOB Ewing defendants.
The object of this suit is to enforce the ven
doris lien on house and lot in Spring Hill.
The defendants James Ewing and - Ewing,
not having entered their appearance, and it APP
pearing by satisfactory evidence that they are
not residents of this Commonwealth: 1t is order
ed that they do appear here within one month
after due publication of this notice, and do what
= A copy- t p'''' ' ]. N. RYAN, D. G.
TROUT, p. q. mar15-4w
7EvHE COMPREHENSIVE OF Young
4 s. REESE, druggists, was by mutual con-
sent. dissolved on Feb. lst., 1870. Dr. Reese.
howl God hai int of Dr. will
continue the drug business under the same name
of Young s. Reese. DR.. Young remains with
the new concern, and will be glad to serve his
friends and old customers, B E E R REESE
marl5-3ts w. Is. YOUNG.
NIRGINaA: at rules held in the Clerks
Y Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty, the 7th day of March, 1870,
George E. Price who sues for himself and such
of the unsatsfed creditors of the estate of Alan=
son Harris decd who will come in and contrib
ute to the payment of the costs of this suit,
Plaintiffs,
Rudolph Turk, administering of estate of Alan
son Harris, decd, james Fl. Harris, George Har-
Walker and = W alker his wife, Qate Harris),
Eb. Simpson and Mary Simpson, his wife, (late
Harris) Martha Harris and William r. Harris,
heirs and distributes of said Alanson Harris,
In CHANCERY.
The object of this suit is to obtain a settlement
of the estate of Alanson Harris, and to obtain a
decree for the sale of the real property descend
ed, and out of the same for the payment of the
debts due from said estate.
The defendants Thomas Walker Id Walk
err his wife, (ate Harrs) not having entered their
appearance and it appearing by satisfactory evil
dence that they are not residents OF this Com
monwealth 1t is ordered that they do appear
here within one month after due publication OF
this notice, and do what is necessary to protect
'n mar .s'esvs'' '0''s J. n. RYAN, DC.
EcHoLs, BELL & CATLETT, p. q.
VIRGINIA AT rules held in the Clerks
Y office of the Circuit Court for Augusta coun-
ty. the 7th day of March, 1870,
William Crawford. .,.,,,,,. Plaintiff
AGAINST
J John D. Imboden, Michael G. Hartman and Will
liam H. CARRIER Defendants,
r eaAe IN CHANCERY.
The object of this suit is to enforce vendors
lien for $25O.00 with interest from 18th January
1854, on house and lot in Staunton, part of ''Old
Bell Tavern" being West corner brick house
The defendant, William III. CARRIER, not hav-
ing entered his appearance, and it appearing by
satisfactory evidence that he Is not resident OF
this Commonwealth: It is ordered that he do ap-
pear here within one month after due publica-
ton oil this notice, and do what is necessary to
protect his interest A copy-teste,
marchS--4W
81 saas Baker Brothers.
SPECIALITY is now made in favor of