The New York herald., 1870-05-13

DO u on the Olh OF Oct0Oer An III, alDe year. Ia.
desi no 0aly MAS no y ,ectlun taxen on b hilf u
tie ;c nad sur 10 the ifnts ~. tas iden ., DIE
he was repsaety ana rgeotly reincs Cd 20 =
lull consid .raijn 'ot III sn ch AZ was ncc aIc'
TO 10 m5nliesGy lats,, ana - Y . inc sah' GU
y exon an i)r also ioOd o tle uo'elasns
area. In January, LOS, re eicnlanps "'
ugcd thrr three as O. ..; lslll esh an,. 4 y,uns
grl; Il wo ia cavei Ath ia ieS, nd s mal ~
want na ne Cheese, wno u .ot BIC Z IN ne nonse ns
only child u. delicate boy OF ab ut tnirteel years
ami IN, tutor. &c tIoman per a ing 70 DoY orsfb
named Luckicr larry sworr al on Vie oth jan
uary inc &c cndalt came iuto The kitchen w AsNo
nos to tale basket INTO the apple room hn
fccn some apples mat she 4 4 so; thai Mr cison
cane nom u siilnd the app. room door ana aii.
"Ooaie here, iwant y0a; l have at you now, on
iass p tnat he IL n threw mr. upoa two mattres o.
hin for ONE nlOncnts q ying IS Ice az pu ihg
hs VII skers; taat hes y, shluii liee "a ,i y
had iofrioe onn ton with nor. Tue WON IA fe;-
wards returned % h,s work the ktcAel. ald, a.
she sand, never mea ionod tn . any other subse'
qncn N lscen1y 9ns eplr.oltie Q end snt to any.
90 " unt,i sne nal dnall, lat the serv CO 81 me
defendant at the c 0se OF the a. i'ut
her story was not w.th1ut some corrobors-
kitcneu when de!en ant came th,Ou5h it; that sh,
az rwaids heard Fay cry 0ut in the app 70 m
" rds saw Mr.. ia xson ana the cook On tue mai.
tfess together. she dld not s. eak oi what had
eeon 10 Parry at ani SAD eQuent me, or parentB
% any one olse whic sh was In tno service O. Mr.
Jackson. Tne def ndant uenf d the W i0e OF tbs
etJry, aud II had been sougnt discred tho tes.-
IA my OF Parry and Lane with res, CT 10 he scene
IA she apple room ~ snJwng tnat in several
minute but not uhtm y0rtaut CIR umstances they
mast hage posed fai ely. irst wit regard 10 the
mattress, e ts pos ton IN the lumber room ut he
u.ac WI respect to the attet he dad not tn nix tie
siignt discrepancy between me testimony Oh fairy
anu LaIe material. The nIrd point was with respect
o. tlc ha consid cred cre uiy he 0bje tons
alleged to the ev ience upon AL three ana ne dd
aOi max there was any mate ial discrepancy BE-.
tweei them or any ~ .tement whl was incre libe,
aud ne could not be Innuenc-d "a by the evilelce Oi
the arcal Get wa0 during the heariag OF The case
had Ueea istructed BY The solicitor ex lmino the
q OF OF me appc room. Tne house had been d..
erred ior some time. anu 1t WAS impossible to SAY
lb.h the door VI the apple room and room iisell
Il.n two years ago. His Lordsh hen al uded TO
uDscqueut laiBi Iaiites, which were saiI to have
carrea between hc dc endant aud Parry alter her
return to the rectory Oh the lO.h Of January, when
nc -1id. "NUw ol lass ii I've got you ito trouble
snail sag YOU were IL trouble wn N you we eawayn
u.'on whea sue fopi.et "FhaaS you, sir" ana
turned ou o. IN room. These trlns ctols, ne mad
sal were WI nDat hc ss4tto Y limits for offences
commit ed within which aioAe the defend mt was
punishable 0af they direct led to the first charge
in iae articles whch bore Il tie the I'D January
leos. On tAat day Parry IA I'd swo tIat wnile sne
Was dustiag the study Mr. Jack son had behaved In
an neccni manner tDw rds her that he repeated
Eis cVnlu IA the passage ana that Two m ntll5 al
Uranus nc enseieu her osatVum whie sne Was
reslng, with his boots IN ms hand, aud threw ner
lor,IDy npon tue bed. Towards tie end ol March
inr DC enuaht aiso gave her glass OF wine, whicn
SIZE beligycd was msuiclted, and rom the elect ol
wncn ne became aearly inscnsible when he threw
lier upon the neartn rug and committed adultery
MMnh hef. CA expressing wish to leave
phed tnst n she did he would neither pay
ber wage nor give her a chara;ter ON the 7tn Of
Aay file was al. and then The defendant letc ied
octnr. bnt sDc tOld the defendant sne did not re-
.uirc one as she was in the family way lie then
loi in me iafuy way, or else he would not do any
ming iOr nef. Dr. Gfi.nn was iriend OF Mr. Jack f!
'Oh, aud Parry alleged that she obeyed the
lons o. icf na,ler. and IL was an uncontroyeried |
aci t3ai every occasion sac steadily denied that
,Dg was pregnant. HIS Lordshlp |
la sc1 over olDer contradictions In Inc eyjdence
Id said that ice nust gave uue weight TO he oDser
i4i ca oi llc queens AdsOcae, t it the defendant
.sanns mnseu Of tae privilege as party |
ne time, anl saat It was not TIL |
Ter hearing al the other evidence he had |
IA kson "a H"i sisiIay ne gsri when she was c0l-
.Ied Inu o next be aayerted TO- Sne was servant |
snom hc hesed and impicitiy trusted. Hal he |
- dn ie- 20 perform as n clergyman towards the |
timer, o. wee they dsGha.Fed oy the mere pay /
neni .. hcr W. cs. Hal tue clergyman no reploof |
or tRe past no adyice lOr the future TO offer tns
ring WO.alng or was hts reason that Inc knew ne |
Va CHARGED with Dein. tie iathcr OF ncr cIid Hc
iiH sworn most posityey 10 tne contrary. HIS Lord
ap dishc ieyC3 ta at tnis time ne dbl not know he
nast nave h p0s ,s '' 2, aa o ar J%aeat %
soa. Il his defence s"-vr were True. % at 'aH M,
i0ui, wicked. un4rSteIui. nal gnant accusa-
lou; lou .n,,., his 10 ina, nation could only have
stcn a caninny nad never cast ltS shadow over his
mind. ~ had deliberately sworn tlat not from aay
-Duf(t, FcTN IA OF tuAftcf WtdltftF bhu n ever
heard chat ne was suppos d 90 be the atheruntt
me demand FOR money a the letter OF January. The
character given after that line was OF such kind
~ - reader comment sGperiiuDus. The ,ettcr
aimed deliberately f1.<e character, tAc result
o. conscious guilt on the part OF tue defendant, aud
ne OF oianon tnat the enid born ia he rectory
,n 6tn OF October WAS bcgotcn IN the rectory Oh
he 1tn VI January. II nai been proved that ne de-
endant WAs m embarrassed circumstances AMI at
ast the woman took tne most reprehensinle step Of
going u IN. church at Ledoury AMI. during dL
gine service, holding up her enid and ex.
ben l4 ssla sbas mr. sew jaw was ' tae father "a Of
the child; ne pearel 10 be a respectable man oni
taere Was 40 proo OF any crlilllaliiy between inm
ana Parry, wnlic there WAS evidence that npOn one
90 ssiun She said ''she could have been married 10
young man before 1t came 70 thispty IL was not;n
meaning that before she had become pregnant 10y
some Que elsc she might have married her lover
There was no reason wny, n Jay was the father, She
should screen MN. II had been strongly urged upon
him that N he believed the evidence OF Parry, he
must pronounce thar rape had been committed
upon der on the 9th OF January, ana that OF
he did noa however. feel himself 10 bc under
nny sgc1 necessity IL might very well he
Iaat her person was violated against her VIII
bar Jet that she dd moi resist snncionty 10 bring
me violation wltnln the category ~ wsla tho crmt-
lai law considered rape. According To the evi
lence, she WAS q chasfe woman DcloTe this wicked
assault was made upon her by her master and she
Sas not, IN his Lordshfp's opinion. n consentng
party TO me cYiminsi conversation. The principal
suon WAS whether the TACT OF criminal conyersa-
ion had been proved, and not whether sue was |
party 10 it had also been urged that
u nc Ioluu MI JNck-on guilty ne must consider
Mr.. jackson as having aided and abetted him but
be was unable TO see that any such consequence
would now from THE pr mise of Mr.. Jacksoa's quit
II might very well bc that Mrs. Jackson In gno-
rance oi the quit TN late period. and that after
the discovery 81 II she had done her utmost To
shield him rom he consequences. Eis Lor,islup Ia
conc udng his elaborate Judgment. saia:-"After a
very csre4ui examination of all the evidence, and
assisted bs judgment upon that evidence by "A recol
lccuon of tue nauucr and demeanOr of the witnesses
who rave II, ana applying 70 tne admitted facts of
the case tfe ordinary principles Of human conduct
have Doca comp lled 10 arrive ~ the very painful
conciusinn that toe descendant has been guity OF
anuitcry HllA Parry aud ol iDdecency with Lane.
II N di-grsccIu when the ordinary master or q
household nyaiis himself of hfs Authority AMI posi-
u0n u corrupt bis fcnaie ser, ants. Dut when that
master Il alto cicrg, the disgrace " greater
aud isc conse4nelses lar more nlsclicvops. Tne
scandal which the condtpt VI the or ndant has In
hfcteg upon the parish committed " his care
appears to have taken dac9 root and viii not
b. cssily craicaicd. TIE dclendanl has done much
~ injurC TIE cAasc Of rel gi0u. ana 10 weaken
the influence 90 the Caurch Ia which hc Is a
priest Tie Churvh ana The parish Of Leduury have
right 10 expo, tAat tGCae taings shall he tornc ia
mind by Tins C0urf ana that feelings o com 9as-
ssnn Tor the fainiiy defendant snail De allowed 10
Affect the scnience Nhicn the gravity OF the offence
requires his moi com leisnl 10 me, however. o. allow
We original efcsce n The ctn VI January, which II
wthod 'he lins VI me Two years prescribed by the