New Orleans Republican. [volume] (New Orleans, La) 1867-1878, 1870-11-10

VI ClkuV GAOo00AO OVAL1o YCA huAuA"
In thus frankly communicating with your
honorable body, have done nothing more
nor less than that which conceive to be a
duty, and / now leave the matter to your
judgment and action with an earnest re-
quest, however, that if action be had, it may
be taken at an early moment. This will ell
able me the better to be prepared for the
opening Of the courts.
GEORGE s. LACEY,
City Attorney.
Statement by the City Attorney of cases
pending in the Supreme and District
Courts Of Louisiana, for and against the
city, October l, 1870:
No. II, Sixth District Court-Mulligan
vs. city; materials and labor, contract,
81 ,507; put at issue by the city; still pend
ing, not tried.
No. 26O. Fifth District Court-Williams
VS.. city; damages caused by mob, Sl744 :
put at Issue by the city; Judgment against
the city; No. 23i5 Supreme Court; pending
No. 1908. Fourth District Court-Tudury
VS.. Mount, Treasurer; mandamus to com
pei receive city notes for license; pat at
issue by the city; still pending, not tried.
No. l0,059, Fourth District Court-City
VS.. Labatt; commenced by the city; still
pending, not tried.
No. 33S, Fifth District Court-Heistand
vs.. city; commissions Assistant City At
torney, $28. 6O2 SO !: put at issue by the city:
still pending, not tried.
No. II 500, Fifth District COurt-DwyeI
& Howard VS.. Nugent; garnishment suit,
5000 u; put AT issue by the city.
No. 1858, Seventh District COurt-Ean
Bcnthuysen ct al. VS.. city; salary as as
SCISSORS, S22l6 Sc put at issue by the city
still pending, not tried.
No. 1913, Seventh District COurt-Denegre
vs.. city; damages overflow, $1,000 put at
issue by the city; still pending. not tried.
No. l6l, Fifth District Court-Belot VS..
city: damages by mob, S26S73; put at issue
by the city; judgment against the city; No.
1924. Supreme Court: pending.
No. -. 1873. Fourth District COurt-Gagnet
vs.. city; damages by draining into.canal,
$500, and $500 per month !; put at issue by
the city: judgment against the city; No.
2El Supreme Court; pending.
No. 4l2, Fifth District Court-Smith VS..
city. city notes, interest, etc, 5000; put at
issue by the city; Judgment against the
city: No. 1910. Supreme Court pending.
No. 4S9, Fifth District Court-Lanabcre
IS. city damages by mob, $1,000: put at
issue by the city; Judgment against the city;
No. 27:A. Supreme Court; pending.
No. 40S, Sixth District Court-Bietry vs.
Landry, Controller; mandamus, contract
certificates, 5000; put at issue by the city;
Judgment against the city; No. 1890, Su-
preme Court: pending.
No. 1871, Sixth District Court-Bietry
". city; contract claimed, S33, = SJ 2i put at
issue by the city; .iud gment against the city:
No. 23sS, Supreme Court: pending.
No. 4SS, Fifth District Court-Belot VS..
city: damages by mob, $3.50; put at issue
by the city; Judgment against the city; No.
700. Supreme Court: pending.
M Fifth DiSt,.i Cnuy+-Raban yS
Mount. Treasurer: mandamus, warrants,
etc, Sl4,S56 i3; put at issue by the city
Judgment against the city; No. 24ll, Sd
prcme Court; pending.
No. $40. Fifth District Court-lIanna VS..
city; approved bills for ballast, Sil00; put
at issue by the city; still pending not tried.
No. 59S. Fifth District Court-Smith VS..
city; city notes. S21G,jS5; put at issue by
the city: still pending, not tried.
No. 743, Seventh District Court-Fauria
VS.. city and John Davidson: damages, burn
ING vessel, S650o; put at issue by the city;
still pending. not tried.
No. 26ll. Seventh District COurt-D Aquin
". city ct al; Injunction 10 restrain Sheriff:
pnt at issue by the city; still pending, not
tried.
No. 2j2. Seventh District Court-City vs.
Grand: consolidated debt claim. S36.043 10;
commenced by the city; still pending, not
tried.
No. 10. Fifth District Court-Wurz-
burger vs.. Mount. Treasurer; mandaInus.
fees as Criminal Sheriff, $3.50; put at issue
10y the city: judgement against the city
No 1873. Supreme Court: pending.
No. 33l. Fifth District Court-Lockwood
VS.. city: fixing value Of waterworks. $1,000:
put n issue by the city; still pending, not
tried
No. 332, Fifth District Court Richardson
vs.. city; fixing value Of waterworhs $1,000;
put 1T issue b. the city; still pending. not
tried.
No. SO. Fifth District Court-City VS..
Howell & Mcndell: issue OF city notes,
81, IA; commenced by the city; still pend
Ing, not tried.
No. 1873, Third District Court-Ec-
Ciosky vs.. Pease; DANCES. appeal from Fifth
Justice OF the Peace, 500; put at issue by
the city: still pending, not tried.
10. 800, Fifth District Court-Sullivan,
Billings ct al. VS.. city; professional ser
vices, 5000: put at issue by the city; still
pending, not tried.
No. 463. Fifth District Court-Bell vs.
city; fixing value Of Waterworks. $4,000
put at issue by the city; still pending, not
tried.
No. IS.53s, Fifth District Court-liutrh-
kins VS.. city: ballast taken from the
levee; put at issue by the city; still pend
ing. not tried.
No. COS. Fifth District Conditioning
vs.. Mount, Treasurer: mandamus TO receive
city notes for dues: put at issue by the city:
still pending, not tried.
No. lJ20. Seventh District Court-Sticls
ncy vs.. city: coal contract, loss on certiti
Gates; put at issue by the city; still pend
ing, not tried.
no. 2?,5.4, Fourth District Court-City
VS.. IIOyle ct al: contraventiOn powder or
dinance; commenced by city; judgment i'll
favor OF the city; No. 21U Supreme Court
pending.
No. 739, Fifth District Court-Waples VS.
Mount; payment Of Metropolitan Police
warrants for city dues; put ut issue by the
city: still pending, not tried.
No. 1862, Fifth District Court-City vs.
Clavcrie: injunction. collecting revenues
commenced by the city: still pending, not
tried.
No. o3,ol4. Fourth District Court-City
vs.. Moseal ct al; plomssory notes. 81 400
commenced by the city; still pending, moi
tried.
Ne. 1886. Fifth District Court-Citv Us
City Railroad Company; repairing streets
SiSl: commenced by the city; still pend
ing, not tried.
No. 23.0l5, Fourth District Court-C.ty
". Ahadie ct al; promissory notes, Slilz ~
commenced by city: still pending, not tried
No. 1887. Fifth District Court-City vs.
Crescent City Railroad Company; repair
ing streets, 500 50; commenced by the
cijF; still pending, not rried.
No 3,0iG, Fourth District Court City
vs.. Maiuse X Co.; prolnissorv notes
&9N97 So; commenced by city; still pending
not tried.
No. 7,zJt. Fifth District Court-Craig IS
the city; services as school teacher, 5000
put AT issIle by the city; still pending, not
tried.
No IA. Sixth District Court-NcGuinn
VS.. Landry. Controller; mandam.s, eertif
Gates, o2199 SO; put at issue by the city,