Buchanan County bulletin. [volume] (Independence, Iowa) 1869-1891, 1870-02-11
CIRCUIT COURT,

Clerk, d. l.. Smith, Esq.
Samuel n Bralen vs. Illinois Central K
r Co, motion for new trial overrulea.
. N II Moore VS. p NJ Cline, continued
for service.
james Jamson VS. James c Haskins
continued for service
N 5 BaIger VS. Wilmer & Farris, mo-
ton for new trial overr.:led.
5 j Il Jones VS. I Mcconnell, dismissed
at plaintiffs cost.
q III W Eessel VS. Wallace W Fulkerson
new trial granted and cause continued.
The State OF Iowa VS. james McElrath,
dismissed. Costs taxed to prosecuting wit
uCsses
s Thomas Uilort VS. Henry W ilk ins
new trial granted. Cause continued
y Ingram, Kennedy d. Day vs. Farris &
Wilmer u gment for plaintiffs $ll73 50.
~ iiliam Lewis VS. Keller d Miller
judgement for plaintiff Sill ~.
III The State OF Iowa rs Cummings and
Malone, trial by jury. Verdict guilty
Uecudahts fined $40 each and costs.
II The State OF Iowa VS. John Cum
mings. defendant plead guilty; fined SIS ar d
costs.
- L 3 Cook vs. Illinois Central r r
Co, continued at plaintiffs cost.
IA Jcu Lake Us Vince Weaver ct al, on>
tinued 10y consent.
10 Lester Reynolds va T W Rich. jury
trial. Verdict lur plaintiff 1921 62 New
trial granted.
10 JOHN S F.ink vs. Jeremiah Murphy,
| jury trial. Verdict for plaintiff Sl52.
II Niisol q Strong VS. Samuel l. Will
| mer, settled and costs paid.
| Is & lellel VS. ocai.nd, jury trial; YER
| diet for plaintiff Sl4 43.
10 E Kenyon VS. Samuel L Wilmer, dis
missed at plaintiffs cost.
20 MeC,eatn, Wentworth 4: Co vs. Geo 4
Locke CT al, Judgment for plaintiffs VS. Geo \
Locke Say0 o5
u Sargeut, Bros & Co VS. Geo A Locke
It al judgment for plaintiffs SlI73 As.
=. james Jamison vs. Geo and John
DAVIS Judgment Tor plaintiff Sl57 81,
- Spbrlla Benthall vs. 4 ibert and Mary
Corlel, judgment lor plaintiff $lVl 50 de-
cree Of iuleclosuIc.
u William Spillmau vs Nathaniel Burr,
continued by stipulation
10 edward Sickle VS. Israel Titus dis
misse,i at plaintiff cost.
2G Charles Y Mount VS. Geo W Byfield
jury tr,al; verdict Ter defendant
- Il 5 Updise VS. Eli Cutshal, Jury
trial; verdict for plaintiff >sl22 50.
Is d D Holdridge :, S Peyson and What
& Co. judgment for plaintiff sos Is.
% VIM A Jones VS. ) Murray. Settled.
80 Wan Jones VS. Thomas Diggns,
settled
81 VIM y Jones VS. VIM Penrose, jury
trial; verdict Tor plaintiff S3l 90.
81 Wa a Joaes VS. q IL wilson, centlnu
cd by consent.
SO john Vanston VS. james McElra.h,
l,,-,, n. 80,
"a Eckhart Zlnn vs. Phillip O 'Bren, con
tlnucd at plaintiff cost
30 John W Nc Mlllen VS. Diehl & SEyser,
continued
aG David Borst VS. Buchanan County c. al
jury trial; verdict for plaintiff Sl2O.
81 Vacation of Bonrdman's Addition to
Quasqucton, decree vacatng pla.
50 bartholomew e Yates rs Buchanan
County, Venue changed to Blackhawk Coun-
ty.
80 L W Hart VS. Arthur Kemp, Judgment
for pl intlf SO 81.
Al Il Ilelserman VS. Walter Pritchard,
continued at defendants cost.
Al jed Lake vs. Sullivan l. Clark, Set
tied,
42 Elias s Hovey VS. Jane. Ryan, juag-
menL for plaintiff $50 II.
43 E,las S Hovey VS. James Egan, juJg-
ment for plaintiff STA Is.
al Eli Ozlas VS. ID II Gill, continued Tor
service.
A. Isaac S Freeman vs. Aretus II Gould,
judgment fer Plaintiff S3l7 %.
40 Jed Lake VS. Millet d Ozias, continu-
cd for service.
II Jed Lake VS. james II Y-rton settled.
as Norttiup Peek vs. McVay d Ingalls,
continued for service.
AZ Elias 5 Hovey vs. Joel Sanders, iudg-
ment Tor plaintiff S53 10.
50 Jed Lake Va j ullan Ellis ct al con
tiuued for service.
81 Patrick kerwin vs. C McGowen,
jury trial; judgment for defendant S44 40,
81 Charles NJ Clark vs. Crum Il Gltchell
Judgment vs. james Cium Sl77 IS.
55 Northup Peek VS. Mayer & Ing alls.
continued for service
81 Northup } Peck vs. Frazier d Ingalls,
Judgment Tor plaintiff 1922 So
30 Notthup reck VS. Wilson a INGALLS,
continued FOR service.
36 Honry j Bush VS. Alfred Wells IT nj
Judgment lor pla milf Sl523 90
81 John McGraw vs. Peter NJ HaIIeck
judgment for plaintiff $l05 o.
50 John Ii Davis Tor N } Peek vs. G p &
G Spencer. judgment ivr plainuff Sl!4 ",
50 Elisha j Pratt VS. A ,str TIA, sets
tied.
% Martin Ozlhs VS. Thomas Zuraif,
Judgment for plaintiff SIl9 IS.
81 Martin Ozas vs. Thomas and G A
Z'inlf, Jud snsnt for plant II $40 81.
" WI lam Wallace rs d McCulley.
Judgment for rlniriff $50 G5.
% JED Lake IS Geo "arish. Judgment
for plaintiff SD e.
til NJ , liooinson VS. Alexander Munger.
Judgment i'r plaintiff Slo' 90.
I'd NJ Robinson vs. Nichols Lewis,
Judgment Tor plaintiff VS. & w Lewis
Si..o VI:
" "after Chiids VS. John Newell,
continued ~ consent ~ days to file
answer
Us Amos Finch VS. ID Hastings. con
l'hueu.
% JED Lake VS. Joseph NolSomot, set
tied.
~ Jed Lake IS euyer d. Muncey, set
tled' 49,,
- Jed Lake vs. Band Mary N Hamm,
JuuSnneht or Pia'htl1 SZUo 9e.
= jed Lake Us Peter Halleck, juds
tor plant III SoI US.