, 1870-01-19

skM EgIf-IR H4GEStocHER HoA1c1pk
No5laA naseIlocher, a7mintsttatttx Of the a.
M tsss OF Atcn.el Aasea.osasr : :. Jacob nshsn.
II u uudesttood tnat tn!s casa hss refereuoe to
the deasa oi Michael Th= defendant and he
0i Tie p2IEy whose A1ninfssf4tf11 sucA, he being
sLa.,hed. fne casr has not hince been CO IN the
low, 10 collect under ,ae siasnte fcr tnc denth
cauSed. There Vas c1nsldefA1la CON motion at
the the Of the he4th bnt arler :he Coronets In
quest. 1ats Eeens 10 aa'e snaededof 70 have been
John S. Falier '. Ch aries y. s:eyeus. BIZ to
ees asldt 90 aKfectucut 1ut me diiaoluuon OF .
partnership between tutd Fuller aud one Charles
". Stere1,s. aud lor Al Accoua uaIt1g- II woulo Ap-
pear from TIE ull thst toe parties acre engaged
In ceiling Photographic anods aed tnates1ais, Al
10 DearooFn slee- std wtte doing prosperous
but:ucta, GosnplasnaL1 who vas tra teliing most
Of tie time soliciting trade, entrusted the uhXfgc
Of the t1kIncss AID d! th= oooEs to defendant. II
Is s:4ied that anou! four moatt8 prior 10 the dis
ins to tee conpisl14art tnas tner oo,lnols Eas in
b sLktnK col1ltlor, that tnsy wcge lo'ing money
aud must cseut1*ll5 nste Al a's:xnnsnt;
that tlese Eepfeseu:auoas we're Eholly false.
n complainant nta latslJ discovered, ana
wee nane for the purpose Of forcing
cun t.atnaLt ont Of the nrm: tes' defendant fre.
scafER comp a,naut Out u the badness, and snat
hs gave ccu p11l1ant on rll1etens decisions. Gel.
tio0H atxtea,ents, IL Writing, showing that his
terest 10 lae hIs,ness was cJnstsutiY diminishing,
and. ~ HeaEs Of such ln.sc st4temsnts and repre-
sc.tAt!o 8, 1Ldnted tue c0Ipla.o1ut, or the 9Th
Of 0ctuta.f. l66d to eutrr mo IN agreement, Ia
aIIt3IE, d'bsutE1tg the n1m, aud Transferring Fol-
leafs tutc:tst Steven fur g. a1, ~hen ID reall-
it, It was ~orih more tnan ooub!c tnnt amount.
tt0m,stT ant tra es tua'. ~ttnn1t his EnoTledge,
h'ettEs enustd d 10 re tfe1te1 IL ta1s agree uent
&6 Sah rs rht consideration iUl lne uAu lex, and
rEh' he ifG!leri did lot dkcnvtf the amount uuul
be hao ~ti ne' Ihe ag1ee1,eut, aId receipt for
lie UOLry; that tt tntt uemaGdt1 an exp.au9-
tlcn. A.a vas i.to.1ed BY Stevens that
be mad tuEtrted that AMOUNT IN ordtr
to flo" the papers 10 Ii. Ne YORK credLtors,a1d
rtta s1-tain h's circuit hE causi1g them TO helere
tLat LIE kAsl.c$s Has prosperous. The biil fnI-
sher tharceH the deIetsdBuL with having Kept ~
AccGuh. With hiB ~iIc on the nf1n bonks, and OF
hnf11E Iafd net large sun1s OUT af rue nEm fuods.
on xcCount OF EoHeys Adso1cc1 By her, 81 de.
fendaLt thtme, but tbaf COT p'Atcant neyer had
aIy II oHle,fgs cf such adv4nce', a5d believes
ftl- aceoCIr to hare neeu t7us kePs 10 cover d.
fendsnt's orn sbostcoutlga. Is IL also B.ated
tLat On I. ans IETge puEeha.ts MADE by defendant
It Nc y YORK he EeCuFed NJ extra percentage OF,
witch Re etaeulkea fKou hls partner, aud thAt he
mate 5a!se er.I.es uPoa Tic iuroice BOOK to tn-
duce coz painaLt 10 nsileTe the liabilities Of ile
n11 10 be muca erta:er than trey really we're
aud thun fr!Gbieu him into dIs!O1u..op- Goa.
pla!nAnt tEats1s that Stefeua occupied rfuctaiy
relation, and knQull he held 10 accouLr as strictly
as trrAtcc. The Ill! praEs tnat the agreement
dssnlvtrg tnt partnership nav BIZ n:rullco rs
fiaudpIen, that Ihe defendant NAV produce his
ina ho