New-York tribune., 1870-08-22

the representation that our cathOcs fSat Si they
are not Instructed for pasa sse TeTT eTnTfa6y The
Bishop opposed 70 the pScpSea ccpoSeasntionsv opposed
fae he strcnnGnsy o sp1 the statement have referred
tS Tv saving our American Ca'lo,d ,d 20 be eantions
seed tsnR taaR hs great Tuhs ,s HE ,ms Gs
got want to dispsasc allow such thing to be Of
hg ameTcn Catholics who can say wn % er%, as nn
best instructed pSGsn pgss asked for leave and it
anted INTENDED to speak on subject thst was ws ,nen cO
dominant and Il Tn the the Of day or two
however the entire order Of proceedings was
new series Of topics were also presented to u.s. But
wrote out my discourse on Evil Government i sen. a
conTse took occasion to show that ours 10 believe
the best form of human Government TLd 'e SQUIRE
# That power Kings Tas TSsed for Sy their d benefit
that the people were not created d ioT o Ssgv
patronage or projections for the first 800 years OF her
history she managed to prosper and arrive az az
them; while she prosecuted she so prospered tnat
the blood Of martyrs has everywaeT,sS oI,S Seye
been happy thing for the Church 4 Kings gsh had "a
pretended TO be her PSTe gSTe perfect
liberty TO every denomination OF Christians; tnr nx ~
believe this was better for the Catholic religion than II
she the object Of the special patronage anu AID
aSs O9 Sf So faS taSof Truth is mighty and viii prevail
We are sideiby side without every sect @
which of MS teaches that which is most cOnorma6ie to
Holy Scriptures Then II they approve our regioh eo
hest theory. Illustrated what l said by eontrastinga
condition Of Catholics in all nations Of Europe swdin %1in
the Catholic religion is perseeuetdd aIGn na5 ss in
ters OF Charity being driven out OF the country that
in Italy monks, pastors religious people were pess
Monte Casino the home Of science, for which voice
raised in the British Parliament had been ae,
stroyed by a nOmnally Catholic Government, Wheh
came down from the ambo Archbishop Manning himself
strong nfallibst the first to rush forward taSe
me by the hand and say You are q true repuDlcan
There were $50 bishops who hought with the Pope hat
he was infabe We saw certain at once, from the be-
vet we thought that had discovered neonvenences
the definition of this dogma which 1t was Important we
were 20 bishops dwelling together in our agrcan college
in Rome We met TO know what course we
urged us to do what we proposed W. TO "TT @ No not % re
Pope most respectful letter ana impore MN r nUt mn IN
the address TO the Pope in Latin ana Mas ph one eI
sign it. & P|ercans ag exeept the
Archbishop of Halifax, and two Others The Arohhsnop
S but Bh'deGf Se deGned to '" sign the petition because
was member Of one of the Committees on fatn, ,
no PAPER on this question either against Besides
this. there 40 German and Hungarian ana even
Italian and French Bishops who addresst similar Pet
tions to the Holy Father There others, also, who
declined, because they said il would show q want OF OF
i did not think proper TO adopt our suggestions.
when my turn came 70 SPEAK & enera6e C e pSTareh
| of Jerusalem, whom had known for many years
notice Of and to which obliged to answer; he
was strong speaker. In the first place he made srlk
ing analogy between MonOethism and Gaisceanism he
showed that these passed through the same phase that
they went side by side. This discourse was very IN
geniOus, very deep very historical, and gave great
| offense to the French Bishops. When L en-
tered the pulpit | addressed myself to the
Council and then, before / delivered the DISCOURSE
which had proposed for this solemn OCCASION asked
sSgd make sHe M ON On tue bov PsSrcS of J
salem In the course of his rcmaTkshe SAID we were ds
cussng question that has long since been decided 1n
declared the definition Of the dogma that the Pope had
full power TO declare infaibilty Why, then do we
waste our time In discussing II at the present iine sd
10 the Cardinals Council. 81 exceedingly Obliged
to the venerable Patriarch Of Jerusalem Tor placing US IN
such good company. Every one knows that
examined the question of the Pope's infability but
they their way through, they could not ma
sufficient evidence in Scripture OF tadton 10 9enne ts
personal independent separate, absolute lnfabity OF
the Pope; therefore they laid the question ASIDE linen
proceeded say that had proposed TO say TO the
greatest If fault has been committed by you or
| by those who had direction OF this Council !;
that error Is this: You did not from the beginning
state what you by dogma. You say the rope
has nfalbity but 1t has never been DECIDED AT what
time, or how, or in what manner want 10 KNOW wneh
lam TO obey the Pope infable interpreter OF the
teachings OF holy Scriptures and of the teachings OF
tradition. You have never informed u.s. My beloved
TO a PAPER in the East which will not name, which
has greatly abused me- That paper said was Obstl,
natey Treverenty opposed TO anything that emanaled
from Rome and especially the subject of infalhDnty
will turn TO the whole tenure OF my NE ID ts cy
then said Your definition Of Infalbiity has caused
gIeat deal OF trouble It created schisms and differences
of oninions i'm the Church One Pope, imagine 1t was
Nicholas L. taught that baptism In the name OF Jesus was
all sufficient, without the name OF the Father and the
HOLY Ghost II he nfallble, he never would have
| taught that Here is John the XXIId, who teaches
the pulpit that those who die with the peace OF Goa
on their lips will be In beatihe condition tnti lne Day
Of Judgment. Are TO consider those teachings ex-
| cathedral