Burlington weekly free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1866-1928, 1870-04-29
gblnendcn oounl, coart-iprn Tcrm.



Tho Co,,r, in CHARGING the Jury in the case Of
Il-e -. - -. .i--.- sad -f..
- t-.,,-L- %. r.,.vs.- $50 which
-...--..-y no., H.. ,se.-I,, ave. him
'-7 l'--''- IT, 81. ...r.s -t.... as.
49,. ~ ,.,,-.f -.. sum -.,u,si
-, an, a.. -,,.1t,F bss made .1t q srf-l
49, --,.. -,-rd.. the 3afar5,rt b.. 1-.,el his
49, All rba burden .f.si- r-,5f is a, -he
4r.-l.., .r..-.. +a.. - t.s
,.-r. - ,t, rr,ls tie rlaiptf warranted Bot.
-, h., an r.gbr So Now -b. lty- does NOT
.sa- no te--s o.. warrant sb...I he
me- IN o. rsss terms in order O. constitute s.
--s,.,- Was then the language used te ths
ID. men +t-s +ra3e Of such ID elar4e-er thtt
t,e ief5. r,f had n RIGHT Co infer !u I'd lertll.-
I'M. -r.s ,rt of the plaintiff. shat whatever lie
,g5..+g r.It51 -,rov. H. be AS rerrpseutel II 500
fb,- :. vas s, 5eiert TO constitute warranty .u
81 no. r,b, law Tn 1e.J.re this agesti o.
Won tnns- +tte In 70 consideration tle probable
.i.s,.,,-s- If tho ,I serslti5r. ami tla purpose
FAR which tsa lief end 1t wished the HORSE
-..,,,,i.a-ir,- s1s, that l4nrulre must be i1ter-
-rst n a.rIfr.-, r.. Ms natural tn orl'us-r .--
rr. a distinction .b, aid alWsv. De tlseu be-
-, ~, o,----ss;,, n ~ or.u..1 and s.. posi-
ti-e - AMI If in ,If. case the lssa iau-
s+,..l rl, h. ,,isbsl o.. I..s the horse (. r. al.l
The Tfgi,tq sill he ,-4. ...u r5-l-." tLl-
might no held 10 be a rosstige assert I'D % q fact.
nof ar e7rression OF oriri7n. II the p4iut.
undertook -o have the defend ar. uu itr-'ali that
. the horse was sound and On this account was Inc
luc.! ID, c,n5rlete the fra Re. he lauil BE- Dee u
lie liable 90 nav the defendant the difference be-
tween the value Of a sound and uu sound animal
IT, however. the r1l1ntf saii pc mas nos un-
sound az -tr as he se,r. then j. is p 'ce-sary for
t,s defendant &, .5cv taat the rlaiuuG was
aware Of the unsa.nIness u which ,le defend
q. "a
testimony carefully. bearing iu m'ac that the
plaintiff had t-.e experience 10 horse trades.
In Judging Of the difference Of opinion Of t1e
various witnesses In regard TO the soundness o..
the horse. YOU must remember thar ,here is iae
greatest difference in horse observers. Take uy-
self for an illustration. ! presume might snow
On looking at A horse whether he went on three
legs or On four, but if YOU should let a dozen
different men ride the same horse past me,
should most probably say that You had shovel
me As many different horses, while ! should be
a-ie 70 reeogDize Zach rider second time 10
regard to the question Of resciuding the contract
the law recognises an offer to DO SO as merely an
,lf.- =. trade hack
Tho ,1r7. after heinz ont an hour returned a
,.,-li., fo- the rlainti-f for -st2 50 and costs
rh;s ts;,, ne last If the civil cases. the State
- .rsj orI sayer..l',, 5isro-el az The
s-,,,ssi r.- +b. form and the
..-- ai.,,,-roJ in 1b,s noruinr at nine
80 80,
F,rn.v ArriI aa. 1870.
e., ..,,,,,.. -f H., c,,-, Ioqet- o,,.,piei
- 81 - and A. six O'Clock the
'ls " .-, " tbs C5i,tcn5e1 County Court w4s
e'tll ned sine in "a die.
;rba f1lIo,ring : a comrleta list Of the cases
and ~ Their 6nal DISPOSITION by the Court.
-
-, OBJ on p Do1St.ij was rendered in
Jtiy'.en' Jys M. H.s - T-,,,.'g q Trop,bs-
TIE io'-lNlis o''.i-e, C.rios e Martin vs..