The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1870-04-28

nounced morning, noon and night because was pros.
d so9ea nc When the rsns
instead Of pTSp nd wSen ne
S: ynR aRT 9 has Sssn b ny
time mmcmora himself as eeyao 'eS eoIo nd ron s
he talks a, i were w. p''''' 00uO'0'' anu 'e'
SIN TO PRosxcurs MAN
Who ha, been guilty Of killing fellow man. In the
tbs e. Res c the las, gasp = n: dying
srgped ne case alone Tor %gydsf1yss
r he n"d right 10 dc snn -so T ~ that No.
ycroea me Judgement Of the Supreme Court which
rue PRISONER WENT TO MS DEATH
SS; nav S;t ss a' nc
e .,ss.' !: .SsSs, ,s entity tSss
s;y. ana .sSsd ssys osscsd % q v sS
fr mi. crime because he insane When he nred The
s pi on XXI, w9J,esr M nsy syns
r,,ht TO reply: They, gave this mans CONVEX,
ercusht home fo II. FSoSedse ~hS
,Sis ac That S eyGen sna s'a n
- have s rEh .s 70 s 10 answer
SynS Snn G rsfS sS % @
ncuSs,ns and nnsiy sxplodng on the ssth OF Yoycm!
q nssny except show that the man was not IN.
period OF time over which Seg have Isem.ey ys
gone2 In regard TO the case OF Mcleod heard that
trial. for your Honor snd myself
porB LIVED IN UTICA
=. shs, time know al about Il from beginning TO
think your Honor was ,nere The sres, Question ~S
IN cs Two wn.e e.. Ss r
At chip eva NJ the time the man wa, Killed. That's
syy %a ss,s s 9rs e s e %n as
e on side The quc.,ion here Il whether The sanity q
have proved before they rested We showed the bo%I.
THEY ADMIT rus DEED,
Snt set NJ insanity which u trne complete defence
,ds. counsel wsn,; e know wh,,
cSn fastened upon III, defendant 10 the mode So IN
ns enc @ 'r %u ;snf o So SSs ne
and soSy Of ~ 5Ss 81 "a q al de-
determined nevertheless TO work ont the wishes Of
POWERFUL GANG
scni Z ss,y Ga. ssso%E,s AZ rs:nI. Ssish ,ssy
viii Sq' c ana h s s' sy
not under,tsnd murder as Z, . written ahont IN The
HS fis which ais Re cant m
form :, Ale concertion LLssehisr They DO not
our proof and they mean 70 90 through he answer
COMBINATION OF SIT or PEOPLE
si aps A.. S sSSy IS ms
Pe % v s am ssea esy %ss" 70 d. = BY
ro.esuon wish 70 prove order 70 % F1w n
%p'' sSs eS s sp e. S.Is h So is 81
s,v. the witness ;oo gpSn The ttsnd concend
hT c, Sn that s;9eS ,v, not , TSny Tfs
Tessi1 and DO Got therefore any way % qne'.
s ss,s S NJ Sc s,,, g Under
,as ;lD.e and .R:cisc S.s' evidence offered %
hs original rnlt ot this charge, or imputes malice
judicial experience TO know that The higher yon rise IN
the sTnse o. responsibility. the more ready and plant
TO COMMIT PERJURY,
esty on he desSn, Of the Rro'ccption and TO
tlon can batter down the defence Of insanity trust
VIDE ' s .sas 'iSa back On and
tsS .rs 80 ra ss. hey % %Sy cn s But Instead
proof bv bringing matters that instead OF eonyincns
sa 'y my duty tS
your Honor TO interposc, and
ARREST PROSECUTION
y the career which they have set before them. Now. II
the p.,s. a s' tor took ne ground that
Sess% ns ss, ,';,d
90 not nd Cate Ane &
mn' ; 20 into that and malice before
Eitns;. !; called i9r he people, ana ToGos
q 4, yo,r Honor Tlsht rule .. they desire but ma.
Your Horror now bound 70 cIcnds ali eydonss Which
thlSv stich :TN.snate, ,stir dig nal case
s Court 5 ana @ ny ss as.sn
nom which th!s a;sg;sicn ha. arisen: the DlsiTct
.ho9tiSgI and q he did state T." The objection v
ought 70 have been given IN evidence BY the prS.ecn
ton in the course q the og,oIag o. their case 20 The
oresee what wcnd be the spccSc character q inc de-
could been propsry R Saq
hut The counsel ior the prisoner Il was only neum:
tssy d 'eS the The
But ns q atefce n% Gs caGs
%tns. The greater porson Of wSSm s.ed iS 10 se
sSnyeI;stan. am the appearance Of the accused
tending over very many i being cOntcnioi BY the
HEREDITARY FAINT OF INSANITY,
am ctions for INC last two years II the rieN Of
sH The rial Sad d P pfoeeesa SS p geSfs
sling might have tpss
n ns, h S .c 10 e or any o. the
ss wa, or he dee%ce 10 1m nterp oss
g@S S have have S3oasnt a oyen S
Now & be S.ae G Of D ne Of n f
Sss "S'as ~ o.s %s da
a sf das SS sc Gs not" o & / nS sna
thai the Prosecuton should be permitted 20 giye iney
opinion rTosscaoa ,eno show that %'i he pi inf
L sae sSsd sa S sSS ne
csn or e hs e5S Sa MAY ss ns o P as
5sa nome d e, cs IN he order
no, a! this iSe permit evidence such offered
| i
am entirely justined have approached this conclu.
sion with some reluctance, and with great for
the ability and thorough knowledge OF the counsel for
duty TO say that my conscientious conviction Is that
THIS QUESTION Is COMPETENT,
and should be answered.
II was thus decided, Mr. Graham excepting that
Mr. Greeley might answer the question, and tell
what McFarlnnd told him about the first shooting Of
Richardson. But as the hour OF adjournment had
arrived, the answer was postponed TO II O'CLOCK
this morning, when Mr. Greeley will take the stand,
and answer all questions watch may be asked him,
with that philosophical tranquility of mind and |
crystal lucidity OF expression for which he is so
Justly celebrated and warmly admired.
II Il expected that Mrs. calhoun, and perhaps
Hrs. Mcfarland will also he called by the prosecu.
ton to-day. II they sdonl be, the interest and ex-
element Of the trial win be wrought up to a high
pitch,
The Hon. Charles =. Spencer Formally With
draws from the Mcfarland Case.
To he EditOr OF Tie Sun
SIR: Having this morning learned that my as
sociatcs displeased with letter written by NE
Arril ~, instant, TO Theodore Tilton Esq and
publis ed to-day in the New York Tii6URe and tue
New York SUN, ana believing that entire accord Of
counsel is absolutely essential, retire from the de-
fence of Mr. Mcfarland.