Daily national Republican. (Washington City [D.C.]) 1870-1872, 1870-02-11
THE COURTS.


CIRoUIT CoURT - JNdgs CARTIER This
court was engaged as follows yesterday
North hmvrivan Insurance Company We.
Shepherd. This case was some time since
sent for arbitration to Mr.. Cox. The referee
made report, which was excepted TO. The
exceptions were argued by Messrs. Bradley
and Phllbrook, and the award confirmed.
Mr.. Phllbrook entered IN appeal.
George W. Utermehle We. Naomi Utter.
mehle. This is an action Of ejcctment for
certain real estate which the defendant
claims as widow Of the plaintiffs son. Aflor
the testimony Of the first witness had been
given the plaintiff had attachments issued
for other witnesses, but finally suffered a
non-suit.
George W. Utermeble vs.. Charles Utter.
mehle's executors. This Is an assumpslt
for 500, alleged 10 be due the plaintiff by
the defendants, by reason Of their promise
TO pay one half the costs Of certain suit In
the Supreme Court Of the District OF Column
bia, In consideration OF q certain compro-
mise 10 surrender Of the plaintiffs rights In
said SUIT. The jury found verdict FOR the
plaintiff In the wholeamount claimed. Mr..
Dayidge filed molten for q new trial.
whitley vs.. Bannerman. This IL q case
involving patent right to mowers, &c. Tho
defendant, Bannerman, was given leave to
fied. ' "N WV F'" WI"
Kendall vs.. Roth. Judgment by default.
Hubersy vs.. Sholes. Appeal dismissed, and
judgment below affirmed on motion Of Mr..
IIlne.
ANVIL CASE.
In the matter Of the will Of Patrick Green.
This Is an Issue out Of the Orphans Court,
tho heirs Of Patrick Green denying that q
Will offered In the Orphans Court as the last
will Of Patrick Green Is In fact bis last viii,
and the Issue before tho Jury isi 1. As TO the
execution Of the will; .. As 10 the sanity Of
the tostatorj and Q. As TO the undue lnhu-
ence exercised over the making OF the will.
The case was argued by James T.. Williams
for the opposers Of tho will, and Mr.. Mat
tingly for the will. Before tho close Of the
argument the court adjourned until this
morning.
CASES TO-DAY.
The following cases are assigned for trial
today Nos. 900, 300, "a, rs, 215, $50, SSl
80, 1870, 1913, ia, It's and 90.
Adjourned.
SUPREME COURT or TUE UNITED STATES
Thursday, february 10, 1S70.-On motion o.
Mr.. Stewart, o. ]. Hlllyer, ESQ.,, Of Nevada
was admitted to practice as m attorney ant
counsellor Of this court. r. ..0
On motion Of Hon. Matt. II. Carpenter
VIM. l.. Weber, esq, Of Michigan, wat
admitted to practice as an attorney ant
counsellor OF this court.
No. $50. Tho United States, appellants
vs.. Norris Kohn.
No. $40. The United States, appellants
| VS.. Henry Grossmeyer.
No. 800. The United States, appellants
vs.. Huldah l.. Stanton, testatriT, &C.
The argument Of these cases was cou
cluded by Mr.. Attorney General Hoar, Of
counsel for the appellant.
No. 3S7. Tho United States, appellants
Va. Nelson Anderson.
No. SOL. The United States, appellants
VS.. VIM. Pollard.
These cases were argued by Mr.. Hale
special counsel for the appellants, and BY
Mr.. 7. ]. d. Fuller for the appellee In No
3S7, and Mr.. A. @. Riddle for the apPelle'
In No. SOL. ...., H..
Adjourned until tomorrow at II o'clock