, 1870-06-10

eaEly explained, but an kadaded taas nntEaet
Nj. Twohig was ANXIOUS to get tnis SILL -
aad th1t In doing = he tesosssa ~ oonntsnsnce
How far the committee we're imposed apon ~ LIZ
matter, or how far they mag have oeen r.
Ia enopeh TO eay that 1t is NOT on the part Of MI
THohf0 The person to whom the cont1acS was
awarded, one Of those lal. open, nohsst hsasac
Il vas. 10 say the least too sharp to pass the Of
Th cnurt then djscnsscd In the light OF the case
as found, the quality Of the order that should be
1cahc, alId, upon the autlIorsy Of the Supreme
Cou1t IN tie application Of the Stddts Zeituny for
awarded, wherefore Il wns Intlmated that decree
would be entetcd making the Injunction perpetual
as to Nalworth Co. q contract and ordering the
proper parties to eontEast VIII ~ the complainant
Meanwhile, another suit has been commenced
In the Circuit Court Of the United States, based
upon tie same contract In this case the senior
FARMER OF the firm Of Wa1wnrtt, Twohlg Fnrse,
VINO happens TO he Nonresident. seeks to re-
strain the execution Vi Judge Wlllams' decree
rights Of his partners under the contract The
suit Is Us fo1loWB:
James J.. wa.wo.th r. The Board Of Super
pany. This blu is ned, in iacf to prevent the en-
3orcement Of the decree Of the Circuit Court OF the
county, as Etated above.
he is the senior member Of the Gs1n OF Walwortb,
TTuhEE Furse, and that be provided all the capl-
tai To ca17y on the business OF the concern, the
junior partners giving, In consideration Of their
Shares 6f Its PROFITS, their services In the prose-
ct1tton Of the bl1siness the firm made proposal
to supply the heating apparatus for the C5unty
sn - AfyuR ~ e0a5ss q eFas9n In r. oTn
tails Of this business are Set ont, as thai
the Committee on Poor House aud
PaCnsrs OF the Board Of Supervisors is charged
with The nctlve management Of the Poor Hoase
and :be erection Of the new building, and Us sach
committee Was authorized to advertise aud re-
cPtve bids fer the furnishing IT heating apparatus
as vel - to award contEact TO the bidder whose
proposal Ehould be most Advantageous to the
:: county. Under this power the bid Of complainant
and his partners vas received and accepted, and
| upon the following DAY, the 18th Of January,
| contract WAS executed between the county aud
| the nrn Of WaIworh, Tw0hig b Furst
| fo- the construction and setting Of tht
| apparatus at the price Of S2S,962, unde1
proper performance Of the work: But as ahou
l1s time the Northwestern Manufacturing Com
| panE tlled bill TO restrain the execution of tle
! contract, In the Circuit. Court oi the county.
| Thercupun the case vas submitted to the Law In.
tstute, ss the legal advisers Of tue county and ~
binding, and complainant and his partners pro
ceeded, under It, TO the execution OF the work
| letting contracts for masonry, $1,000
Tor boiler, etc, $1,000, and Tor pines O
noW, In the sCIrcuit Court, decree has been or
dered adyerse to complainant, from Which au ap.
! peal has been prayed and allowed. This gPpea
! the county autAor1ties now tnre1ten not to prose
cute, but to award the contract to the Northwest
e1n Manufacturing Company, to restrain whicl
! for instttuting this proceeding, that the Circus
| Court is not now In session ..- .
E.tlce Of application for Injunction Is given, t
* argued In court on the 2sth Inst