The New York herald., 1870-05-07
SUPREME cOURT-CHaMSesi.
Before Judge CardOzo.


James Fssh m, cs. Tae albany ana Susquendnna
Ratirodd Company. The motion On the part Of James
Fisk. Jr, for leave ile and serve supplemental
complaint IN his action against the Albany and Sus
quehanna Railroad Company came up yesterday
morning before Judge uariozo. The moving papers
consisted Of The original complaint. which has already
been published, the proposed supplemental CON-
plaiut and the following aildavits:-
SS,y saa County, Of Ns York Jonathan r. Herr,ck. being
snsquehanna Railroad Company regular meeng of the
oc. city hbsS On The s's s.s a. Of s Msos no
Joseph H. ksmsey who caims 70 oe and acting
said company issue 10 him 1000 shares Of .se sspi.a
and moneys dsDuscd By hun ana other moSsys ~hss
be might have to asbaIss for said comp.uy IN N.
self, with r. II Pruyn, JAIME. Hendrck and " A. Price,
striking ou, all rcercuce to services and ciaimins
,Ss %s %esss aSa Ss
board sea .is as s IN pr % o :
scindsa members of sad Board having
ooS IN the sSnss,,S hs e:s advisers S oa u:
snch OF stock for unasccrtaned claim. Another
Of this. directing the Firsnee Commi,tss to use The
stock claimed to cs REMAINING sssod IN The band. Of the
had been foreited). amounting to about 1884 shares
company, their discre,on such stock negotiated Al
not sss Than par aud her action 10 30 by the
mittee which under his control believe from
utons they passed. bu, was refused being
told that could hayca copy until they
account or statement presented by said ramsey
by him in them further than for the Ramsey
to repeatedly you know gentlemen what part OF my
confident from my knowledge Of ths affairs Of tn.
company that the Ramsey already much
than he entitled for any services
made or rendered for the and that an examination
-''''N j. T. GERRIck.
sary Public
Ciy ad Coey e Ke1o York Jonathan r. nerrck, being
y sSHaa on o sosrs a
OF Directors 9, the many and sSsgnshAnna Railroad Com
which directed the to Joseph H. RAMSEY Of bill
rendered by him, amounting ss s for alleged services
the said company s5s 1869 directed
INK 70 sss a Tor alleged services. counsel fss and en-
penses. After the passsse OF the two resolutions the
shares oi the stock Of said coGpany alleged 10
be the balance S Of forfeited ed stock belonging 20 u:
resolution prolonged, yiolen. and angry discussion
and Hunt when ehas. " BAY
faith. !asehood and usurpaon made, and the said
.he minutes which rsqus.. was refused No,withssanGns
such opposl.lo,sn the resolution was adopted From my
that when thu said resolutions nothing whatever
and That hs said resolutions Se al Of them ross scSs;
Of tbs OF ,bs directors voting
ana Hsndres endsrra S ssrnaos. e
Ssrs OF the " pasSss ,%o Commits aemspaed ended copy
retary tben also refused 10 ls,
NE take copy of be minutes Of 'Ss preceding Teesng
Sworn before me, ths 2atb day April isO--EDw nd
CTR and los'v of Neo Teh Edward Ensign being duly
sworn says 81 am managing cers IN the once Of painn
sttorpeys the OF said
AFFIDAVIT of Jonathan r. Herrck hereto annexed, the
attorneys hui through an oversight thew failed
70 the rhe said affidavit the plain
M ns !" as motto" Tor s.Y e al G SsS sYs
Sworn to before me- April 30 is7o-R. rIpsx. So.r,