, 1870-03-03
THE COURTS.
a Clear Verdict Again Rcn.
dercd for MRS. Won CLAIM.
Fell Into tho Tunnel Excavation
$4,000 Damages Demanded.
4 Compile Of Burglars Get Eighteen
Years Apiece in the State
Prison.
One of Governor Pa1met's Pafdoned
Convicts Turns Up az Thief.

20
ecr p:a,r Eli, there being bill and cfoss bis Vas
tpe wife. TIE CESS occupied sixteen days in the
1r!a. The jr1y vas out forty. ho11H. T1s
o1!y ro,Eta OF interest OF the case coostst in the
distractions {oi witch a summary Is preaeoted>,
ard 1le yerdicl- The distractions, greatly COZ
denied, s,ated the Law to be:
In .h,s cese the order OF investigation a.
l. Whether defendant had committed acts OF
vlo!ence.Auounursi 10 ez;rem: csue!sT.
2, II such acts had been conmEed. thens
vtetbtr connla:naut had been guilty Of nke coI-
d7c, araYrsr the dtfcudaus, and then whether the
act. proser against defendant, II there be such.
wc.e t!ts tsrfnpnrt;orrd to me p1ovocancn.
1-cctr ,ae pleadi1gs ,nete are Three dstlEct
I-erss IIe-tEttG: ...
i, mas The eefcrcatt beea sn,lsy Of extreme
spd repeated craelly toward hls w1e7
las The coEp alrant been guilty Of such cru
e.ss ioea1d Ler hushatd7
:. Vas there a c. inclination between complainant
sid &c. relatives Il, ser up IN defendanth oss-
e!ill 10 Obtain d:feL1snt'a proper.y or money, BY
EArr,fLg MN. aud ;hen, On g.onndless charges Of
cruelty, 70 oota,n = divorce aud aunopy7
The statute ol Illinois does not authorize d.
repeated cruelty, ana suca cruelty mast
Le es.aah:hed BY q ,p'ep95aerance ot
ns 40 o s neD o 9s sass,
wLlch might be se4soanolY expected ~ ptogoke
;kc ACTS. II laese acts were not OH OF all proper
lQH ~ kHE uSAtlAEA@ u <VltpialAAULS
ihen tee detendant IL Lot guilty. And 1t Is laE
1n2t the Earr,sge lie wll uos be dissolved A. tue
r183eE OF tnt VIE, because OF vlnlc.ce pfoFoked
j. slles hs9e u be-
tween the violence acd Ihe proroc1uon. Maze
turbulence OF ten per. petu1arre Of manner rode'
.Ejc,y to pelsouA EcAl:n OF the safe.y OF CO n
p.alLAnt, .re n0l suC5ctent TO warrant divorce:
-er Will peLuI1ouslta3 or eucR1cess, Il II DO cot
az cunt 10 posture ~rolE. So me ns2.ec. 70 tur-
mt reci S 1r:es ls LoI legal ceuelty for wh.cn
ulr.Tce CAL be had. c0lpln1aalt bad eofnc!eot
moneI iu1nlhnsd by tns de!etdAnl 20 &c. s1en
lht I'll or hts ctedlt, III Gaze fhe was herself Wlta.
cut 4 oues. because, " laR the detenuaut coald
have hesn made 70 Pay ios ~ neesssa1es ~ ~
pleased conp.4toabr. that Constituted no legA
AID su.td r1ovocauon for acss Of lcaRilly ol s!e-
lence towards h,ul. Iae 1estald naa llRat 70
d,epDte ul hls property according 10 h!s Own
p'es5Lle. ,.,... -.
EealirG OF the las, +. IL not ntceSsSry that the
acs. ot defc1aaas eanuld re such as 10 endauser
1he HE III the coE- pia'rans. cor tina the coaduct
Ct The deIeLNsLt +n.u.d be Aeyond The POSSIBILITY
c,ueI,y AID 1nt cu161c1 OF the ,leien2sot are
vholy dt<,tucs:ye OF cnaiugat happiness, and
IeLder It uLEaie for the wife 10 longer i've
7tasoras,- !s.s Il Lex peseoual satesy. There
lore, II The tn1y IL Ills casc should oeNeEe tina:
oeterd4ut las oeen guilty Of euch cruelty, nc
Jury sht uld also 1uu that Eucl cruelty Wa1 occa'
kieEed hy mlsco, cue. Of the c0EpsanRnf, the
ctre:tF Of the hu.pand pot beirg oispropo11io1ste
10 the misconduct f.1 ETeu II tue Vile ere GULLY
Of miEcond0c! al Cruelty, tue Tto!e1ce os the
hu-1ano nuss no. be cut OF ptunor::oo 10 tic
iics:ton iCf ianuinap treatment or for alo1s sIyea
crascgtripg he, botuy Injury, or 1ea.ta. A.r1 lu
ce't rmrLIuR The 9ue.to@ VI csu=ity. the j1tJ
m.ght cousdrr cruelty. wne:h-r affecting me
ludy OF m!Ld OF comrIs1aatr; for ex.tens
t1cl1ty, @Iht1 TIC "ap:tas OF the lag, msy lie
rracttstu ty hasfard to1Fa'd h:s wife nttrs E1se
hS fIEj AFtIT
leciilf 10 furLt.h ter WITH pio1et Cite, natst0y,
food. sud ccnie1 cu!sas strA1ess; iha uss Of
ccaIe: aEn riaieLt language to ,ntu ): Tnmaa ~
t:sl21t hea!tN, or ATTY 0sntr cott1ce ten1!rE 10
rrDcuce rn!s ert. So, II tHe def utant was pas
et.sea of a1p.e neaas, sud .e: 'e:a a,ai au'l meg
lcc.ed to Irocure tece:<.Iy coGIrft= fer cou-
and ahustse iateu &c .wart els vie, aud NJ led
to her pLtCt1:ous t2lbtls or l. tcccnt natsies In
preseLce OF othe--. 'hea vii Or AL CT 1Gese th!ng!
rhoul' be tc1s'de-ed In coaLeclon With acss CT
il cou rlnILaut was r71,y TO the conbI1etlou
efy yus Of eie:a ei,onsa rarrsse and divorce.
sgd, In eAis4lle cut l1st uta:Iu- sne provoked
Etul 10 violence, 1htu. 1sie:s Tue E!uence W1lca
The Gtlct telt II hul Qn,l'y. Alh proof positive
cf contu alton ,s lot n sessary to &c given.
IL, after acts Of vtoltLce camlnt:eo upon her
The coa p:atnau1 rtsuu.ed tns copluSAl felattcns
n antty thia tt!s evidenced bF acka OF aztec io1
teun1' Cd lousehU d, aud letters passing b.,3eet
The Phrtee. then II Is IL De cjIs:ctea 1hs.hsr th
lui, Il there wRs foIs1relese, The Repetition Q
ciuc.y Hcu:d waive Tie forgiveness and reyiy
tue acts WHICH bad been forgiven.
TIE hut6tD IF ps0oI Is On the party making tn
charge oI cruelty. AID It aust be made oos BY
prrPonreraLce OF esideIce on either blde. and th
Ii n.Jtr1'y Of Hl;nesses, nor that complainant 1
uru:reu 10 n.ake our ner case hey oud a reasoEn
BE Golhr, hns It .'guues tnst the evideace o
-. aIeIaa..'s testimony = 10 cleobIlIty, eie.
IL. JurJ passing uroc tue degree Of we:Sit to b;
s, .tia". !" ~ tso J",y sA.snt neese taat the wilt
LESS Cd,h rlie ksurtttan sgued and sIore Il
au 8ll1asI', when nil'aavlt col tales 6ta'euen1
ii raila.cc Win Lcr ktate1.enI5 OF the trial. SC
II tfcy tti!evc flot1 any cause, that sne DID no
understand lie real con ents Of the a1ld4vIt
whettfofe she swI1e u1d:r s m:sappreheos ou
tla:ls In 1npeact mebt Of her testimony, and, IL
he couslatia ia;luu OI this question, her testimony
eti ira: CT tac other w1tLes=es IL the same o.
cusTeEce, rhcnH be reviewed; and, II tue lar
cos.:s'-Ltly eau do 81, uIder all 1ne Testimony
Ill"{ should recoaetie TIC ktatencIt ID tae Atr1ja
VI; REd tie tcssin Ony gwen en- tae Sand to tn
Hypothesis thzt The Wit1e:s has s1oIn To 1h
,1ash.
The ,u,y came in at 10 O'Clock 5esssrdsy morn
lbs. atd Il IS instructed as TO toe DUTY Of is meg
not:., 10 lie o5 seyooa the reaca Of orsu lent q
ccnvic'ioo. At uc- ock The jury came in With
rar:'al verdict. II eas then letu1Ecd. au3, aite
at.out 81 tour,s consideration, brought IN q can
i';tte SCio:ct, npclEg for MID S01 G'ahn on eac
OF :ce Iht e lseuee, g,z.:
J. Tlat HildebraLd Won Claim had been guilt
VI OAl4NAAE A40 4AHC0Atu CtUtlS LQHdlu III
wife
=. That the wife had net been guilty OF sue
crLt!ry toward tcf Eusbund.
8 That thtre vas 10 fucu conspiracy on II
rats OF MIS-, Won Gmhr', std he, relatives to o.
t;;.7 tho lar0Lial property, "a lie had cha1led,
This ia 1be stc1bd nLuM 6 by which Nr Va
GaAn has been f0uLd guilt, OF cruelty.
rECEEE-
George II. Msplose =. Cnarles Williams ct q
Decree ahpulAllg con'tac: CT rale Of Lets J, an
3, In Sab Block IN uof-'oL OF Book }
school Trustees Sui d;sislun CT Sectl,n 16, 3
Il, ess .. n, title 81 Tar as Affected bY II
C0lt1ac., dee.2red III COZ plA;1ant.
MECHANICS LIEN.
Thouza DoxiinS :. o.lno t. West Ct ais,
a:ninistra'crs OF v. u. West. Petition to el
Io1ce elhA1:e's lien CT s:07 50 on Lat IL, Boo
Is, ulrr,tE;pn's ao,.'ti"n a. il improvement.
Jr1NiAESrA
William H. Cra-ca.i y. F1anc.s bradley. F.
s:,*aS -.
Cua!ts IL scat1aa :. LAIN S. Brown aud josef
II. IoL.kcCe1S, FaE 81. $40
NEW eCt1S-CAsk.
Patrick Donovan Y. Llino.s Cc1ttal Isalro
Company. Case. Damages laid al s. 0eO.