Daily national Republican. (Washington City [D.C.]) 1870-1872, 1870-01-19

| the Avenue, And III we are to retreneh AZ ali
here Il the place to do u, right where Public
w wSfk Sshs Ssss ssd vssS
| required an appropriation 70 complete what
had been commenced, II is right here where
I. proposed g eomnSS os Public roTE' ma y
not done here u will not be done at All. He
| complained OF the other end Of the Avenue
6oSsuss AFTER Al It's promises o. sson9h aSS
| Government was doing In this behalf had
| been heralded all over the country BY tele7
sTsPh 'ss ss s,Ss tso,S Of st yssf ave one
| and that was the poor Unpopular Attorney
Generals ofaee. He sincerely hoped that was
lion AZ he other end Of the USpitoi to maEs
an effort to drive the Attorney General from
| power. r...r.
upon what excuse Philadelphia based Its
claim for the large appropriation unlssa ~
| was in the excuse given 10 Tecent issue Of q
6dnS lei SsaPS ~ isest The CIV Of Philads
phiA shAbbily. Mr.. Dawes wont on for q few
moments in an amuhing strain, in which he
tbi' N alter a. one man, while me chairman o.
the Naval Oommittee, lMr. Sooneld,l who
represented the Erie district, was In the hack.
ground keeping time aud urging the Philadol-
AZ The other end Of the Avenue the ofioiAls
are lA6oIing, they say, 70 reduce the public
reduce tsSSiloS Hs SlS col .sS how a0 sine. 20
contamination could be- reached. eithef for
the reduction Of the debt or the reduction OF
taxation, unless We commenced with reduo.
tlon OF the expenditures OF the Government.
How can We reduce the debt unlees wa radnoa
expenditures, and how can We possibly relieve
tho people ottaNation unless We are willing
TO commence the work OF retronohmont 81
oaeo.
Means that the people were carefully watsh-
that taxes could not DO reduced without
retronohment. He appealed to the Republi-
can members Of the Rouse TO stand By the APP
notice here that that eommittse would DO It's
part toward redeemlng the pledgea, and would
eutdown all estimator until the ngureG were
drew Johnson's Standardization. Let future
peoples and future Congresses attend TO
building public works which were not re-
today was retrenohmen economy and reform,
and he was, therefore, opposed to this bill
which he reiterated was but an entering wedge
Of ] oha tho baptist 6iii, which OILY pisos%sd
a demand for money. He gave notice thaTe.
fore that when the time came for voting upon
the bill he would move to lay u on the table
and would call the yeas and NAYS, for he Be-.
lieved this was test question, and he wanted
TO ascertain who In this House Wers disposed
s lie P,Sdss % sSs SS and 5s
stand BY the appropriation committee.
MT. Kelley, 81 Pa, said he eonourred in
henhtly al lhM ut. dawes had SAID, and II he
SsEsi fot Ss gponIR ~, os NV, vas 70 Dc
t oiii, b1t ne did not believe that was the
~ nS st,s II ~, NJ adN9oAted the Dill
sam AZ tbat msnsionsd no. ,So pSH ~ any sueh
NJ Esiisw tbsn n,nesoa n1v ~ % aeoessiry;
snmo nytbs nhfe.,i LIZ \. 70 argue sgalnst
psnSinH IA. yoUs',I,. =, ~ LssEue lssna'
nI,sI ~ ths Mi ass,n NV moIninK hour OK
FTbs Uonse than st.,,, ne1 ~ o'et.
os ~ snDn,,,nn,na., hgIi 'he oohAiaerailon
VI NJ NJ I BP,',, ~ W. p.iL. A.,
psnsiny MI sns in,,.,na ~ ~ iaVor o. the
MI co.Isnniatsl aSSn,s aeiay; The
TS S,S or 30 AN member 1S., MT, fslRs produced
oi, nI ~ maud you'd lose
,tisS isp ps, - pu' ~ sVO 20 stais
nvsr The sHbisct ~ nnnots,So, ~ 49,, r XIV
Ssssnss he yois IN oRa d,.'9, W shos Ihli
IAlset ha ~ .nC li y uio NOT
hoW.d tbst IN ne EsstSsn s,s,.i Is'ss. ~ ~
tt', ~ .,,,s l.s sVne "
Iiets nag m iS larger poPulatlSn thla In
o' W. pntis, ~ Wssssshn.. 1uen
,sntrou,sn ~ s.thst ~ ssd ny, We ae
biS inysstiTstion tSst the IeasoS NV ~
es.I vi - sss.u ~ - " y
sseiueu 70 ~ vi ". " eosuse 70 mAhy o. the
P1ItS. ,bssis, M srs n.
aoa tia a ~, an eieeuonI
40. aii,a.s ~ 49, ~ ~ No. ~. 'or 'hs
mr. IIo.T' Of M,Ss.shusest.' ,,,I,.,,sd An a,
mere were great many women IN Ma,sAehu,
s,s, ~, ,s,, MI ''e'u noN' put ne
N.Y." unty so 1917 NOu,a ~ . go, -
eins ~, Svut ~ 4. " sone lenBn huNo
| eAslht t s 1il'i ny aVusht " pstleeuy CON
! Peteht vi thS iol i " ueleB.,,e 70 nhe Seete
| laIy OF the inNIloI Or any other executive
otneeI the AuIhotlty unaer law 70 declare IN,
| humoeI OF OVERWHELMING, 70 Whloh eaet
| state was entitled, after the number OF thu
| white people was Aseertainod.
| Mr.. Hoaf, Of Mass, addressed the House 10
| opposition to the bill. He thought the bill
| delegated dangerous power to the SeeretArl
Of the Interior, and he was opposed to nEinI
OF the census returns were in. He eharastet
iIsd this as the nrut attempt that had eve
been made In the country TO deprive states o
their Representatives. Under this bill sfror
might creep In, and the Secretary of the 10
tsrlOr would have no authority to eorrse
them. The Committee on Elections dsVotea
good deal OF time each year 10 e1aminIn
| eases Of iudIyiduAlI who claim aeats in III
House yet under this bill a was proposed 4
LEI one 1.-THE Secretary Of the INTERIOR lecld
a. TO the FepFesentatlou from whole StAteG
NJ. wiliard. on IA, AlSo sddSeSssd III
House in opposition TO the BILL
Mr. Judd Of III, explained some Of the pro
visions OF the bill, and then suggested thht
vote be taken on his motion TO reconsider IN
. vote whereby the bill WAS Toforfed, Ia oFdS
! thSt the amendmentI might 10 eonIidsrod AZ
debate had thereon.