Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-06-08
LAW REPORTS.

CmCtrIT CoURT-G. ". ReeUeS, judge
This Court was engaged the entire day
Yesterday in clearing the criminal docket.
Most Ofthe cases called were paSSedtOnext
term. the parties not being ready for trial.
4 good deal of time was occupied in a
discussion as to the prOpriety of trying
the case ofState VS.. Henry Woods, Aaron
Calico and Steve Terrence, cOlOred, who
stand indicted for breaking into the house
Oft. A. Alexander, Esq, and attempting
10 murder his family, and afterwards set
ting FIRE to the house. The argument was
upon motion to obtain a Severance and
continuance until ext term, which was
strongly resisted bvthe Attorney General,
but the Court finally granted the motion
upon defendants making affidavit As to h
materiality of certain witnesses, ETC.. and
caused the case TO be set for trial
on the second day Of the criminal
side Of the September term, 1869.
This matter being settled, the call was
continued until the docket was run
through with. There being no more cases
likely to be ready for trial on the criminal
docket this term, Court ordered a suspen-
sion of the same and 4 return TO the
civil docket. Pursuant to said order
the following eases will be called for
trial to-day:
143 Hylestead VS. Boone ct al.
IA Eagan VS. kittman.
$50 Polk. admir- VS. Edwards, ex'r.
I52 M&TRR Co VS. Hughes.
l55 COchrane et al VS. steamer Rockford.
l56 Warner vs. Hawthorne.
Isl Sharp VS. Powell.
is Heron VS. CarrOway, adm'N.
l59 Mayer sAuer ct al.
100 Driefries VS. Pollock ct al.
l62 Payne vs. Moore.
1913 Jones & Co vs. Celig.
l65 Simon 81 Co vs. Wolf.
lGG Rocker VS. COWden
lG9 Shelton, guard'n vs. Sears.
$50 Zacariah vs. Creighton.
lT2 Houston VS. Bond.
l73 Hawley vs. Keane.
ia Randei, adm'X VS. NJ a OR II Go.
I76 Galloway VS. TOpp.
III Ruff VS. DeLapp.
rs Peyton vs. Heron, adm'N.
$50 Mckinney, eN'x vs. Clayton.
lS2 Barland VS. Hitzfield.
ISL Hack VS. ShultZ.
IS. NJ & CIR r Co vs. Patrick ct a.
lS7 Austin VS. Hack.
lSg Massey. use vs. Park.
MUNICIPAL COURT-GeO. ". UdldrGH,
Jldgc.-The first business undertaken in
this Court yesterday was the hearing Of
the motion docket, which being accom-
plished, Court proceeded to call the regu-
lar calendar for the day, with the follow
ing result, tO-Wit;
Murphy VS. Shanks and nine others;
Judgment for plaintiff, SIl5G 81.
F~arguson, Cordes & Co., - Grant Il
Wadden; Judgment for plaintiff, $7S4 %.
WalcOtt, Smith q Co., vs. VIM; iudg-
ment for plaintiff, SPA 63.
Glenn V. Rose; Judgment for plaintiff,
SIO3S So.
Calendar for to-day:
203l Merchants National Bank ~ Cheek
ct al.
2032 Same VS. HOugh.
oUg5 McMaDnuS vs. Creighton.
2039 Mitchell vs. Monsarrat.
204l Fox vs. Frame.
2O42 Glenn ct nj vs. Fitchner ct al.
20l4 Mayor and Aldermen Of Memphis
vs. Capperro.
20ij Same vs. Shay.
2U46 same vs. same.
2g47 Same vs. Tufts alias Moore.
2O4S Same vs. Lowry.
2O49 Drummer VS. L~OWenSteIn.
1850 Frick vs. Curtis Il Brown.
2O52 Hargan vs. Wetter.
2a53 Potter vs. MckeOn x Dixon.
2O4 Wright vs. Merchants Nat. Bank.
2O5J Algeo vs. Tate, Able & Co.
2Oj6 Etna Life Insurance Company Us.
Stebbins, ct al.
2057 Rocco vs.. President and Directors
Bank Of Memphis.
20js DeSoto Insurance Company ". VIII
liams.
Townsend IS. Cornell, ct al.
2O60 Bolton vs.. Belts x Go.
2U62 Crump, Moore & Co, ". Moody ct al.
1903 Nelson vs. Lacey, ct al.
2064 WerHor w. James.
2Oij Aver VS.. WATSON * Co.
CHANURRY CoUBT-A. Atst1a, Cgcrk md
NaStcr.-The Attorney having the pa
pers in the case Of PostOn Us. PoSton, ct
al. will please return them 10 the office of
the Clerk and Master instanters 4
ALLthe Hlust rated Weeklies aud Nor
thern Dailies at Joe LOckc's, 236L Main
street.