The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1869-05-20

Cireaif C0Hrt.r--The following cases
have been disposed Of since our last
report.
King vs.. Eby. reported last week,
was given % the jury about 10 o'clock
on "Wednesday moraing, and alter being
out all day and night eent word to the
Court that they were unable to agree
they vera discharged aud the case con,
tinned until next term.
Matthews vs.. Hsefier, action for re.
pleyin removed to Baltimore county.
Shipley VS. Gorsuch, action for Sian
der; nou pross. tf 4Bs4f
Michael vs.. Sewers, action for mali
cious prosecution Judgment BY default
aud motion for inqnisition.
County Commissioners vs.. John jain,
action for debt; non pross.
Dixon vs.. Wilson, action for debt ;
Judgment by default for slll.T5
Roach VS.. Shiplcy, action for debt ;
non pross.
George Wilson and wife VS.. c. W.
Webster; removed 10 Baltimore county
Edward W. Selby VS.. Johnzee Selby,
Jr., action for assumpsit on account
verdict for defendant Motion for new
trial.
Stocksdale VS.. Stansbury, action for
malicious arrest settled.
Winters vs.. Gardner, trespass; settled
Winters VS.. Caples,
Aaron w. Cullison and Isaac More.
foot vs.. Elizabeth Stocksdale and Geo.
Il. Stocksdalc, record from Orphans
Court; removed to Howard county.
Young VS.. Hoover, two cases, action
for SANDER non pross.
Albaugh & Albaugh VS.. David Bacr,
action for SANDER; non pross.
Lots aud others vs.. Hiteshue, replevin
bond judgment by default uuder rule.
John Doe aud others VS. Richard Roe,
action for ejectmeut; non pross.
Linton 4 Lamotte VS. Geo A Krouse
action on case; Judgment by confession
for sl4i.43.
Jacobs VS. Yinglins and Stem, action
on promissory note settled.
lieltebridle, admir-. of IIeItebridle
VS.. Thompson, assumpsit on two notes
judgment by confession.
Stansbury VS.. Selby and others
Judgment by confession for s242. AZ.
Stansbury VS. Myers, action of as
sumpsit on promissory note non pross
Utz VS.. Sheets, debt on single bill
judgment by default for sl69,
Dinterman VS.. Waterman, admir-. o.
Waterman and Saylor, debt on singl,
bill /; judgment by assent for Sl10.
John 5. Stansbury VS. Johnzee Selb,
and Lewis W. Selby, action for debt OF
single bill Judgment by confession fol
s42i31.
Haines & Mitten VS.. D. p. Goodwin
assumpsit on promissory note; judgment
by default for 1894 32
John Delphy aud Washington Shorl
VS.. NJ. A. Lauver and Vim A. Martin
assumpsit on promissory note judg
ment by default, under rule of Cour
for S1l5.07.
Aaron and John Criss Va. Peter. A
Shipley, assumpsit on promissory note
judgment by confession for s165 40.
J. w. Erhart, surviving executor o
Jesse r. Bowersox VS.. JohnWm Ying
ling, action of debt on single bill fol
800 /; judgment under the rule by dc
fault, and extended by the Court for 5 1903
John Houck VS. Henry Shaeffer and
others, debt on single bill for 500
Judgment under the rule, plea by default
and extended by the Court for slI4 80
Susan Hoffacker, by her husband, VS.
Falkenstein Il Hollensten, action fol
assumpsit on promissory note for $3.50
Judgment by confession for S30l79,
Crabs vs.. Crabbs, action for assump
sit on promissory note; jud smcut b,
confession for SIP.
Sophia Jordan VS.. j Ritter, survivin.
executor OF Jacob NJ. Ritter, action foI
debt on single bill judgment by defaul
under rule and extended by Court fol-
S245 10.
Motter vs.. Zen, ,ss,,mrs;, m nr,,,
isory note indgmen, bv aonsoss;p,, V e.,
s1a3 an 80 ~ '''" W
state VS.. Georcc Dickson ;,a;o,oI
far felo,r and bnrso s,aai;n,, - =
gu;ltv entered sen,onnaa - 'h p D.;
teptiary for G wears,
s,a,o ns W;,,;su, I.,.
indicted for assault on Herry HI
with intent TO kin ouil,v. sen;en.ed =
'"s S,a,o " s"ms ~ ;,d; Sea', g.. -,
and robberv ;na;otn,aa, a,,as,.a '""
N' State W. same ;ndic,ad qa'" rohh..,