Oxford Democrat. [volume] (Paris, Me.) 1833-1933, 1869-10-01

57-,EE-s 80
APPLETON. c. J. PRnsIDING
s. No o. Nm. fcsscnden VS.. Aaron MIC
keniley. N
This case was on trial when we went
70 press last week. The verdict was for
plaintiff $26, sc.
Holt. Liftleheid.
A. II. Walker.
49, No.s70--Abernethy Grover vs. Hiram
ID. Abbott.
2 Action of cjectment from Lot No. 8, in
Andover. Opened to the Jury and with
drawn by consent. Judgmentlor defend
ant. No costs.
Hammons. Black.
Rawson.
No. 1SS-Sophronia Staples VS.. town
of Oxford.
Action for damages for defect in high
way--damages claimed $1,000. Nerdlct
for defendant.
Black. j. j. Perry.
No. l57-Jane Nj. McAllister VS.. Geo.
A. Brooks.
Trover for the value of COW and he'll
er. Plaintiffs husband, living in Nor
way, sold his farm, stock, &c, to defend
ant, leaving a vile aud eight children.
Plaintiff claimed that the COW was her
property, given to her by her iather' ana
the heller was the product oil the cow
There was some conflict IN the testimony
but the jury found Tor the PAINFUL as
scssing the damages al s'o"'
Bearce. D''eN'
"M' h'iiioa",
NO -oo-" III nay w. N''''''' = ''"'
ana solomon rlih''
IreSPaSS 'or 'r'''ns i morse "'''' s'e'S !"
against COW oil plalntii1' IN "a'erioro'
on Inc zSd oi feoruary' ioo'' U. VIM"
the COW was damaged seriously Inc oe-
ience was tha' the co" WAS a' III ~ III
the h'Sh"aS' anu "o' W 'i' '"S'"'' VI
painful Nh"'ies wis "''' '''ss al" II "''
conlenaed oy defendant mat oo'"'ho''
was not liable IN any event Inc court
ra'her in'ima'eu 'ha' 'h's WAS 'he CASE
Deieh'hn's arc oo'n 'i'"''s
'e'u'c' LOT oe'e"uan''
h''h"ah' ~ i,"e'
NO I4f-ueorSe w L"h' vs. i-u'I'c'
Austin, ct al.
lreSpass Tor cutting anu hauiing logs
from plaintiff land, in Peru. Defence.
the logs were not cut on plaintiff land.
Verdict for defendants.
Black. Bo lister x Wright
Andrew Bennett VS.. James ). bennett.
No. l56-Action on account, for servi-
ces and expenses of plaintiff in going to
to attend to defendants luin-
Der business there.
Defence was, that plaintiff went out
under written contract contained in a
bill of sale of defendants lumber, which
defendant says plaintiff carried with him.
which contract Piain'ih neglected 10 iu'-
Ill. fihnuh denied carrying Sa'u o'" oil
sale ana sand That his authority was con
tanned IN power OF attorney when
plaintiff returned To defendant. Judg-
ment for 54.l6, full amount claimed.
Wilson. BLACK
No. s9-Hosea u. Fuller vs.. HARRISON
Storer.
ASSnnpslt Tor oreach oil warranty OF u
horse SOLD oy defendant I" plmh''ii III
1901 Tor SOW Inc defendant SHOWS uia'
a suit was commenced in Franklin county,
for the same cause ot action, IN which =
verdict was found Tor defendant nj the
Sept Term, 1860 IN Franklin Cos thai
the plaintiii PAID the defendant COST ana
'"e case was '"''leu '"vte' N''''v'
party Judgment s"'i'u'"' nv P'cS''
'"S jug 'u'e" '''''' '"o 'o'''o'"s '"''
- ',''''''' anu ''e 0'''' ''''''''~ ,'''
" - - - '
lhefeuPoh the case WAS n'''rNeu IA"
ana cont'huSu on report Win the agree
ment that II the ruling Is sustained, the
plaintiff 3" become nonsuIti otherwise, The
case to stand Tor trial.
Bolster. fIlssoury.
iAn'mohs. virgin.
~ '''ii''i "00u"'u - 'OS'Ph
l. D"hie'S'
4roier Tor Inc conversion OF logs a'ieSe"
10 nave oeeh put III orooAeu river III
" a'''i ~ some se"S '''i'' anu -"
''"n 10 ue'e"D"'' M'iiS' ""o "9i''" -
81" 'ie'" io' p'"'n''H' - was u p,o',