, 1869-05-01

Orchard street to che corner of La,7a,,ee ,n, ~,
a. and went into the ysr Of her rai5ers rta nae ~
y,I;ene xhea be followed and ii Is alleged, eona::se
! coxrrxAcaors w,1sxss
Edws1l Newman, clerk emplo2e., tv IT,,
nan Co, WAS subp9uaed oa lie ey,n,no Ae.
Taa5sdaM g M material witness IN the casc NJ NJ
iS;rss fotred ne shcs ot'se1 that he I'd III. e. t,u NJ
m.&nt go % 49, ne dM not respond TO the sura.
md tas parties moSe 10 astaea I'm, 5Tsnaass Tne
Issued and m officer proceeded to serve y ~ ~
yoa1g man saw big, coming; vent Into H. s;an: as
tnminn1 side Of the Court, the onicer Itti,s,.u;
hts intention ot cdcciing q fosctolc entry. NJ
,3G man to @ says tae e52ensc 81 q bsok:a iock wla
rendered tie mas duly presented III eo.1Et l,n,1.-
arrest; he Was, then, having 10 excuse fos h.. W',
tal a:s1sspee; q rF1sss., uned y, o. ,r ca
At presen. writing. L. lhs County jail ~ =
Nathan Richardson :. Benjamin F. Robin. ant
Charles 7. Carroll E}ectmenf. Fer tlrfya,,a1t' M
The premises involved il ,hi5 case II ~. I'M mi
wherein y h:lslt anu stands wooden b,ltl,n:. IN
the rear Of Scs. Il and 70 Randolph street i..ns
Ialt' ot Luis . au -, Block turt De:lssrzu Al.
d.tton. 't-
" /. Francis s. osca1 T. Corner ::ros .;.s:,;s.
William H. Hawks :. Henry II. Gootnin. yas.
Damages Ind at s!o,ooo.
RIAL KsTArE
Ecnjnmtn Lombard y Ezra G. Jeoaar{, Inn
Eish injunction to restrain proceedings Ill !es sarc
closure ot mortgages Pending the ,ltsrhs:,r Of
tis Is e. aas 4
4, md Lots l.. ,, a., s. ie, IS, IL 4 sia,,i
Is l'loek i. Iii IL; $, Walsh i McMuilsas MI. H.
sls:on OF southeast quarter Of Section ~ Y, Ii:
B!ccS \, and Lots IL inclusive i: to y us,i. Il.
siss, g. :; md = nlock i, N tot il: III in
IL, IN same subdivision.
CATION TO CHILDREN.
Sarah ]. Screcoxcy. Frank Il SaFcnok. Pro
alcees ,aat She vas narEe,! 10 the is!ehiant 10
!.lsr, lste neF name u shat time beins Aeynoi,is
iii thc CcE,ty Ct Cook. Since the narr1ase she
ayers TIA. she has lived in Chicago stating that
Immediately after her marriage she returned from
ncldS visa heE husband, where they h,azle'i for
atGEt focF EecEs, lf t. end Of which tine. about
b. :, iyasins her hencefoswaI,s without sup;sos
This Is the Eenesa Of q piacctalnx which wns
contneneed u ta;s court On the siss dag Of be-
ses s sts1 = HI,
sspala,tsn we're .;InsEsnt Then ,ae eon2ia!nlat
and from the time Of her britt, she had aiwarl
Mvet. with her father lul mother up to 1Ac TINS IF
Ter fathers dea:a, which event ilpi'tncl about
Of her iatner she .hati lived win he: w na:hsr
lately married TO William reynolds, with the II.
sep9n to Of ng 1Ssat ] xstks woe ny 81 the
said marriage, aat ahoEt TWO weeks Till:
slhce nef said Marriage SIZE then went on IN
FAR "thst at tfc tltI.: Of hex said narzlaGe WIN
sa:d def. EdaEt her ase was fourteen years ami III,
mc1'Ea and TO ni4rc, acd tLat she I'LL not have TIC
sotst nj Of hcs sui. Et7ther of any persoa an
tho1txeLto give such consent - her said marriage
And further, that IS hcr said husband Is mn. ,car4
older than her, being cs she believes, upw:..,l: Ut
tEe aye ol twenty Two years. Ta1t he hsps ut.-
had unlisted ard nEueEced her COURSE Of coaduc1;
tEst acting cnuer h5 advice altt intlueccc sekc1
Ltr Intentions secrtt from, her mother anl tlnr,I
With hin lrom her mothers honsc, IN Chicago 01
tic hight VI Uctuber = 1s1t, for the parleseoI
e!aad. timely marr5!rg him. The hnstan lus*r1.
ell few days aEtez, admitting I'll tac fccts a!:r,t
against him or concerning the marriage aud "a
the se!etence the mother testified that she stat-,i
tia. se was then 8. years ot age, AMI the .Eotarr
from about July IL, 1863, until 0ctob,r y, ia,
I'm that day hc1 daughter asked leave to 20 with
defendant 10 visit the 1sfendaat sister, who l.ve,i
lclt Of thenl for fhrrc or four ,lays wien fettrr
vas Received from Niagara Fails, s;srax ta1t tey
were NJ h!s mothers, anst that they had been mas-
to come home, and theF t1i,t 80 IL about MAE dayA
TheE llycti tocrthe- un1lI this bill Of divorce ws
nseu and ttcn he LEFT
superior court.
Emily 4. King V. v T. Ela2. Decree ao,.,n.-
llg So.EnsESioaeEs 70 assign dover Of ra;.l.a,u-
aat II. lLs i9lGn tnt !ea essdle lot % i'ts vile
~ tne seaIn slae " Lct -: picce Of Ike si-e oI
!He s1un we o. tne hotth @9 lee! o. Lots - VI AMI
=: also % feet wide on the s.t4 side Of Ls lu
nronscn's : addition; also norsl !a4 Of Lot i, Dlxk
nutsaen I ScoHssan o. Tsst Dali or southeast
y ltsl VI sSSs3un - - Aso pasce1 cum
t.lie eIa4is n.staAt IiGt1 lAt eA'! afl1 west
lNsHas ~ !noth ~, t4llsi llustecs subdivision Ut
ctct!oA ~ ~ -: Geo Itct Snntn lrum the ctntre
q y IT, street t. nlean4iax the block on the nor:h.
e. s; s nn1 neIih ~ ~. excepting str1? 8 feet
'iae ite! Miuc iot ~ aHcy also The vest i stt
y ~ auA t:@t " Lot :, q" ck ~. tanal Fr:.i
GO S.HAs's}ou u lotH &C., IN Weat PUTT o! s,l:h-
est HuETtcF OF Section 2, 80; Lp: 4 EtEk l.
y f3sht aettua sa:.u Lufta - acrcS Ut h4.f
u eoulleaAl aGatsef o. Sectlon ~. 3S, l3-
>,cs,e ctr,,,, a, a,s r." sIlIS
~ uay;ess County, AsaunepSt. 1,sm|,.. ti,M III
f1laE,1G Davidson :. II.lr7tsou Ncwha,I aa.i IN,
III " l;4-iA bi!l to enforce s!scidc refiu7It,
= Ghsract 0! sale q la't alleged as c: iil-cn
y, f-st The property itolts ol the Lake II irAt.
+sgnsl ~ seGu9n ~, ~ ~
I-tuti !soocy y SltEEe1 Dc42Metcr and I1Ic,ft
,st!llS. laA VIII injunction. The witt ru>trLn1
'c1endan3 frn commencing suits at lav u tu Ih..
osees.tcn Of. or from collecting the rents nf 1ns
Il Luck II, school Sectien Addition. al! Lot. ~
=, -, 70, =, =, in subdivision OF LICK ii, iI
Fststees subdivision u southeast qta...s Vt St.;-
!o1 :, g. IT, TO which tlcf.ulant4 cL.I tft!.. under
'herfTa tieefs. II would seem that The p,op.r.y
Tas 1eStesl upon hT virtue OF a writ OF ;,ttu.n.
4ent Issued On lite affidavit OF Ief.a,Iants
il:s as against non.stsldest, and sold un,rs ~