The Carson daily appeal. [volume] (Carson City, Nev.) 1865-1870, 1869-08-15
WILL THE yIRGINIA REPUBLICANS
UNITE.

| vi tAHCl A''asf q
proved by the following extracts fror
leading Republican papers, most c
whom preferred Walker to Wells in th
late election. The New York Tribun
publishes Hen. G. Segar's letter on III
result of that election, aud says:
Mr. S-gar protests, WITH aa emphasi
which We know many of The other lead
ling men Of the Walker party repeat
, against the assumption that the D.
mocracy, IN any shape or form, won {
| tr.Impn In the recent election. and en-
| tiers Inio some interesting details as &c
the source of opposition TO Wells
Meanwhile We have assurances from
Ma shIugton of earnest efforts on he
part of the Wells men to heal tue breac b
in the Republican organization III Nir-
giuia, and TO unite the Wells and
Walker Republicans on 1.-THE rational
basis of universal suffrage and uuiver-
-al "mnesty.
Tue Springfield (Mass.) Republican
says of the arrogant reply of Giimer to
Je"kus:
This may all be very true, yet the
repeating OF 1t now, especially the ton,
IN when 1t is done, so Tar FROM con
cIliatory, aud will not have The etfect
TO heal The discussions IN the part, that
nave long prevented the Republicans
rom taking The place they ought 10
take 10 Virginia. However, it the
Walker parry is stroLg enough TO use
such top-Ioiy language to Their lare
opponents, outsiders have no special
ground for complaint But we appre
bend 1t will bot lie many months be
fore the moral support and the votes
III the Wells men VIII be HANDY ihIugs
% have 10y tue = Grant Walker party"
The Democrats, VITO placed 1t in power,
will prove IA very poor dependence, We
tear
The Philadelphia Evening Bul!eiip
says:
The sudden conversion Of multitude
of rebels 10 pure political frIIh Is
rather too ex'raurC!Inary to be Received
with chtldi'kr confidence in he siueeri-
y vi tue bl'sr4N rs bIs We" u
rergtheued by tue refusal OF the suc-i
cessful Walker men t. coaiesce with
.neir rivals Mr Wells and his sup
portrrs clain, and We believe justly, t.
De Republicans of the strictest, most
r. dicnl kind. Certainly some of lhr
orag+St and fzithiuiest Union men OF
Virginia uetoug to that parry. TIL
Is alk-r N, may be sin, e keyLb =
caus, and yet fad fellowship win 'hrs-
10 be impossible but we cannot under
sand Why this should be, any more
ly than that two Christians OF |
he same CeuOmina' MONS should inG
= Orship 10 the same church dIsIAstefui. /
The exact character of the supposed |
Ilreri"r design OF tie rebels wUO vOt- L |
With the Walker party Is not known
I i, thought, however, that, while |
I-ciing Governor VITO claims TO he |
Union man, they took care TO send 10
ne Legislature pers"ns of Their own |
oli'icul complexion, in sufficient uun
ers to control the Governor R-puo-
IcGa geGdeGcIes. Nhen the time comes
IoSt OF tie candidates on tie Walker
ker will probably be found to be
rbe!s IF the hercest kind aud grave
ears are expressed that they wi biuG
he State band and foot. after il Is &d
lrtted by Congress, and then rurn 1t
yer bodily 10 the Democratic parry
or th:s reason We hope Congress VIII
rGce+d with caution when Virginia
nocks at the door and claims admis-
on and for this reason, also, We are
lciiued To rejoice that tue u els parry
ave failed IL ti-ct fusion with their
1t may be better for the
,use of Refu3l icani-m, ard better for
BE peopse OF Virginia, if. the Wells
ltn viii keep their organization IN
.ttiag Trim. awaiting developments.
nd TeaGy 10 take the field again if The
aik-rites undertake 10 betray the
tate ia,o The hands of its worst enc ,
IeS-
Tie New Haven Palladium has the !
lGeXed:
The prospects for a reconciliation and !,
union of The Walker aud Wells Re :
lb.icnns il Virginia cOutIuues good
ID Will probably Ne accomplished.
And on The same subject the Hart d
I'd Courant has the following
There are hopeful signs of accord
tween The Wells and Walker parties !
Virginia. Mr. Jenkins, the chair 0
an OF the Republican State Commit F.