, 1869-03-19

that That Court sustained the coust!.u-
non.li'y OF the act of the Legislature,
ato1mcd The validity Of the bouda,, and
REUSED Inc Injunction asked. Tbs rcpu-
u'n'o1a carried tbs case to the Supreme
Soul' oi the United States. but that
osay o.emfsel The appeal for want Of
~!aop' ~ A1e oecis'on Of the su-
.n1"N eu@ Iowa taefsofa remained
~ an,,.a,ae ~ w eaes' ,ne '11 "aA tesaed
h,ras ~ ,s.:ee, nas.:es sno sae validity o. the
whan % : s.. 1..m on'ui'eacsea su un'i' 1eG22,
aec,,cd srd ~, Nsas. u - ~ 1oo'' VAS
no hn,as h.1 ~. @ 80 ~ yoAts a'se !
,,s d<cis;o, seso W reversed
fnd that Ill ,be.a 49, .,a.,,,n,. w. W nj
de,ed in mn ron,;,..ns nas. "sro ssn-
crntrkyv ,he Sec,s;an -, 1ess W soe
~ 1seo us,s d;s.,.s. s..as ~ aso, :, ~ 'na'
1ati, - ~ ,ha s.r,. -. ' .s. sao.Sa r.
do M, az @rr ea,,a.cn,aoa, ] a.. s,I Me
lr.1n ihess fsc,, trom tbs ho,aha'ss, pp,ss
az, r,ov IN, f-,n 49, xono.,, - ae,so"
f:nnd n ,hc r.1,r,s ~ no sn.ssss @
corvt ~ W. r,1;.d c,.,a,
Tte honds 80 Covn.,
cn];ar tbrra .,o o,ha- co,a.tas @ :. ~. ,ps. ps
state which have .,so sonab, ro,,a. - fsa'a saas
the n,vment ~ s;n;,,r % ahi;as.,ons @ @ ns1.
snb;,ct ~ t.se1 - ,ho $780, ca1as Ds
of The TTni;cd s,s,es IN run,noe % as
cases, and ia ali Of them that COM, ~.
ceptipe The uniform decision, Of ,bs sn.
prerne Conr. n, J,ws an ,ha sn,ho,,,s.
f,vo n,,.,.., ~ 80 cs..s.''.,e
NV Sones1a a1sleA " NAG S9uss11UAen Q!
The State, sfflrmed the validity nf Al,
hcr,e ;t.ro,, h,f.po -
oeAos isAueu oe1o1e lae . IKE t-uft
char gtd It's opinion.
~ .,.,,f ...,,.,
1ae se.onu patscu's1 IN "hlchlt is
DJ4s'Aee,
HoNeVel app!icao!e 20 Inc merits OF the
case as an original nronasi,ton hoe ~
'AtAANNt pAop'al"on, AAs NO
beRrirE upon The present question, which
is,-Wall the pt op!e OF I,ce Cnnntv nn,1ftv
ard by tcIce DEFY aAd de!eat the Iudg-
men,u M ,hp Hated S,s,e. f,o,-t,s
~ oA"~0 os"s9 oooats'
The facts OF the 'DartfculAf CASE nnpg he,
lote LEG cour1s are 9nat thompson, hold
ing inttrts. coupoos, cut IRON these
boHdf, and being refused payment,
brought Eui& In the Federal Courss the
cue was 1Sken to the Supreme Court Of
The United S a!ee, and, after argument,
that Court decided tha. Thompson WAS
entitled 10 Judgment tor .hs amount of
his coupons. Judge Davis, in delivering
the opinion OF the C.u,,, s Wallace.
| $50, among other things covered the
point relied unon 10 s1repuous,v 1v the
Supervisors, by saving:
~ :. ,n.t..s.,s ~. c..,,..
,.y ,sttast on ta aess1ntu sna 2, ieHa az
. d
| ISsns! .ns s1aEy ~ - Toata aare 20 !1ahs
under toe con.ututtoa ana Avs q Tho sts.e. %
,t.t TX H. S1us..t 80
| = = loNss - the p1esent uMe, aoopt thAt EaeH o.
he quesucn; ons when ttese bonds Nere lsaaed,
r ~ eon.isn 1nn,i E9a Al ts,s r. ast1s
snis st COLE !sN.IuJ sninen4e nuhlsi2A eotpats.
| uGEs - 4aesGslne re ~ 80 G214t a-9cx ot fAAeaa
eossd sinss n l..t dssas!en II 1oxa. they Wonld
| - otsu1en ssnnol oe sno. ~ p 1eaae9 lntA1a
M MssMaaL 1ne eouln o. aoxa aarluE. sosn teeas
ena = e ,s ,ssE ,o1ss
r.mnn, - srpssnnsrt sat Hn.,. .ue ss.e!aHt
ton, det.1o5 tne1a.h
While th1s case OF thompson was go
ing through the courts, one Weber, the
holde7 Of like coupons, obtained iddg-
nent thereon, and upon return Of the
execution endorsed no property found,
the plaintiff asked for writ command
ing tie Supervisors OF Lac County to
levy and collect Tax to pAy the ju1g.
ment. That motion was taken TO The
Supreme Court OF The United States,
which Court dccfded-8 Wallace, el0:
!. That " pnb1s property Of a coautJ IN lava
). III prcpe, @ : re@say .! The pnp1te crcd,.o, Ia
inch este iu the sass souFt !; .! nand.na. 70
,sT - ~ * KT,.r s.th tsd..ae ~ .ssJ 80