, 1869-07-08

The coart instructed the 1ut5 ms 1na .ou LII ,be1
nndonb,ed r1;e Of ,1ana ~ foT Tue paiuild asanss
III ~ naa .hsy could 10; and asa'1s
ssas - e. 1s' n.tias,ian atas5 srsa ss''i 10
l.aAs ls 80 necesslJ for them TO be aatsae1, !
rom nc dence tha sasn ;ndyaq2! ',1
va na T1 ourbt so 10 have found, and, II they hare
not the Iour ought to Grant ne~ tnA!;
tui ht1er the fullest :, e1anipson ans tn 'na ne
t.s,.,zony, LasI think The esinence was o: snch
character TIM, the jury had the right 70 determine
y hcthtr not, a4 ~ some OF aAc oeltAoAaIs, INC
(.aut had been waived. !
Whatever may be sid as 70 some OF the defend
aots-M1. Fa1wtll and NJ sG1nuont loE eSain2Ie
autr, think taetr WIS no evidence OF waiver;
and, at any rate, II was Ut such character mar.
N and1S ths M cG oasnt to oes t1 tnle
those defendants who had done nothing upon "a
lntimation to them. OF the circumstances OF the
company. and the necessity Of Advancing money 70
nav ihctr debts coupled with the fact tat they fau
not seen the certificates Of STOCK which we're ssltd
We AaYe 10 make out connection WIN tne COM
psoy on the palt OF some OF these de!endanla7
hy rpuUcat!o:l and not uy original consent, ana
that nuEt appear TO haye becn snade under 1a1
sa1d tSaI tne defendant jast naued fa!ly un'.er-
which mad been IN existence from March Or A'rtl,
IL. and might have incurred Liabilities 70 IN W.
iliIIlied amount. Did he do any thing from which
It could he fairly Inferred that he assented 70 sact
State Of things; that he A. "a inasilu7l mem,nsr
And Tas there Any hct the part OF those gentle
,utp rho hal not seen these certificates o sio3xs
Who had uo connection whatever via r. Il ihe
issuing Of the certificate Of stock 70
cn,luclt them IN any way with Tue Trans.
rcnt!enen r Of Scw York, and others Of these de-
ieutauts eren who may s't. SAID 10 hafe parl,cl-
pa1ed-cauJi tc said THAI l6ey q saned inc respoa-
question think, fairly for the tu1y 10 pass upon
and fos pas sing upon 1t In the Way they have' 10
NOT think tae Court can Interfere .,,
II this was an act!ou aGalnst portion OF tnese
defendants alone, then, pef1aps, IL 1a1slt oF Ans
dut, of tne Court 70 Interfere and say lnat tney
were stopped oy tGeT aess so ~ fna %steSians
~ We have u III order TO determine whether
ttt!t should be nuding against all under the evil
s;t as1 ta MI In tes1 qG %
,t!stu1n q verdict rendered nnue4 SUCH elseu-n'
stAtCt.. ..-... .z.
jury-and llnt was j legitimate argument to be
tE1lc-tha', by what was called me Kansas p1ps.'
+ liz, assentGd 10 the liabilities which Rtre m
tnrreJ' mn anJ the Court instructed the Jury that II
u,ut1 he presumed that ihose who haa signed tnat
paper vprw What they bad s!saen; bur even mat
I,Aj,er I'll the defendants dld no; Elza-
Mr. Goodwin: Al! bat N!enolis
phper rurposted only to decia5e that t4ey wsss
| CN1lpany Did II necessarily mean that they we're
ts.otiatcd from the spring Of 1867, becoming af-
| ,us to M unknown atnouLt OF lia3llltr Was thas
ttet ~ ,naiir Ly The a-euts OF these New York
sehue,nep " " mtn,,!tI1s an, nav 1beir moueys II
- almost impos sbc 10 separase ;nis original, In
| hcrept fFll1d-becauae II catano- be c1.lca any
cured, Hc can hardly sever /. IRON ias sbse-
Hueut acts, md, therefore, It TO certain extent,
rsyes cs,lor 10 eserythlug that TOOK place. These
hfnlc*ita,iuns chasasts,zeli even the certificates
mcpt: IT, Tie p pro1ies t5at were signed and which
introduced or the hssras q .ns a 1uou , toc
grounds a H. alter these tsauiu1en: representa-
dinrreuf &c me ftcu md had tud them Of and eK-
1,nerd e fnr11, the natuce and character
ui the frln1; lal d!auncslf A7satt1
! Them wlat Ii was, that th!s Datterdeltl
tIycrand l,iynatch Company had been Organized
IN tie rpltls ol l,eo tnat it had been ineurElns
liabilities rum time to time, and thal tneJ ~
currta IN unknown amount Of resp1q5lnu!ts ~
IL en- dune, think the case would 1--we occupieu
} different position from what II does now. huh .
It uul was. It MAY te that these n3rISs ss,t VAT
ulHays lookns AZ everything tHat occafteu lai"ul
TIE medium iprnIahcl 10 them ny the represents
tlous Of MI William stufEA ,,,-o, o,,+,o,o
thnk this view OF the case acquM.,es IT, I. aau,lula
lurct from tho circumstance ihat the III l,ahus u,
the deleadanta lan.e y W. I'LL uuss ~ ue ~ te!I
t1ou. for most or inc cia!Ms VI MN lus -, t - ~ ~
Las sought to recover originated TloE 70 lhe Cou
urctop Of these defendants in any way with thi
company.
IN tte OverrlI]t,. 49,
All. Good vim Your Honor does not tell US Hha
Is tne course Of the Court on the new'ydiscoEcFe'
The Court have referred 70 that don
~
In l,nukrup,cy.
J..,to,,1l-De RuBztl 4. Thorn, OF Aurora
hane Eouny;; :; Spe.1 GS,oeTa AI,9' inn RaTtuoua
, tni.aTn. si'srr Tho,nnsan. OF Chicago; uenr
J u H'SSHe, Wsie.,T aiTt: nf .hicaoo. ts'
L~c;e r. :4n'$ ,sh3m ~ u;n;y ''
We, y tot; ~ .s1i n ~ tssrha1ar-WMker Esne,
r., IMaa f;n1xs ,,.n!y H. !itjs County.
I % eu'A' aeA''
sI.rn;I ,,onrt
Marie ii lla%soa s.s' ~ y "aS'a" lime p''nae' J.
: ,,-;r,, ,,.,'H.,t ~ T,.1sr - Nnrty. Tas Was
nM'aan 3 m ne.n. ,'.t,.T t,isc Grret ami iunHsnt
lhcnt hna .of mnnc'osn t,, ih,, ,hrrr had ,rrn
'n'ezzesnt oi dricnaants pIn2eE;y yrt, 1ns ca ~
Has fnr me- ~ ,fnndnn; unIsT the fo,Ioyin
main instruction sn:'cr the csidencc n the sast
! c:.usc for the arrest the notion coad not be ~
sa9ss. ea.ss ,ses lspssD sosla II t. rfosss
teea,'y st5o7 II tnsnss3ys Il n i.
r. q ne snse v,ss mfsgsisE eF
10 direct ny c9tse II @ ece 10 IT a ..
",ne, ~. ny ,r's a;trr ue aeltiHra1n and
ie NJ Dn this uIvlcc IN good falth, action ual he
Fc tnken.-thrn no recovery could be hal on /
i'd rnn,f NJ uunf ~ nnolahic ca,lse
C efoaun o. XIII "a 'xrM Ts1.I
~ ,,,r, ~ nanr1 r:raros Einctmf
J. fotnl - ~ Siis ', s,at5 t,ncf,on,, nnartrY
III sCE sat, " ttc - w H ,Gsi cTanIra 10 def,,ia,
il s*e''ea ~ ~ - ">e" .l1e. e'No'sN
II t,r.-5c,t t.ouo
,11ssrs
Ie - o,H Is,n natd,c- r
j. s'' IL = 11e1 e' A'7s ~ ~ 0&'N
b s+..:. II n...,r+.,r ~ II Dea For s,1u !
lc San'olu ~ lalanus1 y .. H-tt ~ sss; a.
nrs.uias ~ s ~ - :, :, - - - IT,,i,,no nrTcrton n,
D. ,.sr ~ us t.rns.1 Enr &,3s =