, 1869-09-14
tjrruEt f'ouFl.

A8ViHEH IhIpSiFlDSs
Is1ac ". NHslnarl Y. the Boar1 Of Tralc e: 4,
III f1t tt!nnc:"h to rrsfr;.tn the rfcndInts rron
excluding tht: complainant from the foutua anil
premises u: The tsoarn, or from II anT 1uaunpr
Interfering with hts privileges rs netu!ses OF the
toar'i. The rnInrla.nant ttascA thut he has teeu
IN liz ctn hn~1tiess Ill this rLIy t1nr1nR several
tcaTsf at'ts member OF tho H,Ard OF Trade which
hoaru having Tie ro~et, rs II corporate hohy.
AtIt pied Il rulc thnt "tn rase arv rroperty con
traeted Tor fn1nrc delivery !. not Delivered on the
ttas. Mt ha ni'sinn, receive thr properly Oh tho
lrAt bs1 ~ .l1y, nr kettle tn tnt -cllcr ut tlu
average innrk't l'stec III" thu ,Iay Of ma
'!aJ. In case uhy property contracted tnr fut;lrc
delivery Is 10; received am! paid fnr when nrnt,.
tfIs icti!cE, II shall tR thu nuy OF tho st!!Gr 10
+rit i IN t' ln!l1At1 Mt mt tine during the next
1~rh'.-tonr hnHTr, 1T hts oT1Iai,. after such de-
fault si;al hive tHsur t. his knowledge. ani An,
tnts resulting To The st,r shn'I h, ,Iir nnt p1yn.
1'ht Immediately ~ the parties 60 deiaJ1tEng. -
liz <Mtrs tiGt, MI the I lt Ut August, lr con.
'rs!,'.t with o1m T. f K"+t. c.slnr him tor rpu-
hhIrTat!un III" Uiti1un 70 deliver or not deliver
:,4@' ,b-hrt. NJ .i'Ti X wheat ii 31..n Ia stare
lTfn1e a"es's's IN The .ist q; tHgSst. II delivery
W.. 1s'ls'. r',mc,.t ~A. ''.~ snat'". He charges
that lt'sr tIl',.rGnrulv ffamtultntlT interiancI
htaIEr iht signature tht "hrls "a.litF this
nun:h, Hff.r which he asslSnr,t thr cnntrac. Ia
Gfn. Hiram IIakrr. rh!s Ai,rr,s.ta tn.
trart "n- rntsegtirnIF brought III ami 11DfnrI onp
instituted. thr complainant lHlHr uncertain
N9 To sht tlIn,rEta ui thr ur1gthR which tie ll4l
the munth o. August In sllr following nosn,ne.
however. hr ful!'i lila original when hr .llact,y-
ttt'l tint hr had ~ hr BY y b.n rrArttsrt upnn.
lie ut nhrr nuft+,1l lsMkcf, To wtsr haul the sny.
itInrutal contact wa-. nnd .lrtnantt.l itn, ,'ir
trruls "t ,tlr original he rofnpiAI with. TN the
...h tfnr 1t August: stnH lfnrr lnErl hAi,I hr hpt
whrAt lns rnmIl lislant IN a toA;r1,t. t'n1Epasa.
hTIt 'irlsl TINT fr had hnt contract With htr,
W se :nsh II 'sucsE.t. H.krs ctnri fk,' fur tie
alleged refusal tn F,s'"lsc thr wheti tram ilalet
hfr nEnh r"tntH 10 r.s, HaArr preferred rh lts,.s
HrhlHrs hiH!. Tie tLaicf ".H Artrl u,ian ntiH tar
following 1tt'ufI na,1r:
,. :" IN 'l.'rasr'f Hiram baker Against !. ".
"n*"l~ht1 FTlf'tHtte'f tn laIi. rn;,ilnt,i -
un The III tin. Ut S"ptatnt~r 1-fo for
ntlilrnInr1l. VI, liz undersigned rut,,nlttr ct
.tetitrann Ut thr tH,ari. Az. decide that sa!I L.
v. Ws'hl"nf1 *n!f pay .h l,i4ut lAarr ~ Inn.
ng,h IN ii,r f rf whr II Ii tl!srutr. tE..i. Al-r,
!hat ~! M"nInhr' +iun pay tic t"st, uf THIS
trEni, siSia'
t"tnrIntnnt says that upot, ihr hearing
ftr ~hs rrfn4rl th' nss1stan,'r u! tnIin.rl.
the thnlfmal stating that Il was MT tn. custom
s tfr h.nril to nIt,H counsel to ruIlart rA<R hp.
inrr lhrnl. je nian clattus that the Ft,son n in
sla.IHh Of The tpirs established sn,t NJ qiIuieI
nust. 1hIfr lrihk IN tshlcfhr that Itntrr hal
vii, VI to tft,'ttr, ur That ' s1 tue ht1I hIahcl4
pH lhr UIntkct ~ TfsN Ir'I for. ilrtaUsr te Will
mi rHmrty viii lllr al1e4r.l inJnstIrr. ir ts nuw
tlncSIru'.f with rarulsiufi, 10 Pte.rlt whIea IL
tlH- Liil.