The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1856-1888, 1869-04-17
Passage of the ministerial
NLea-uFc.

Tie debate in tie British House y!CgIl-us On
tl= Ir-a Church BIZ we resumed o. the l>sh of
N---a. tie tL- eluiu- " "a IL =ecll1 -eal-EE.
a-----.a= = v--Tore--u;
Tie telegraph reports -la- -. Di--ae.i. leader
Of ;Le e.-sr,a,.v@ azl opponents os,-e measure,
took ta= 159r and -r-ue1 ta4, connection between
Church AMI SAT- w1s necessary The former rem
Ge-cd -lc >-4,s religious. investing - authority
w.;a tie Li-les: s--c-ty. Iais scheme Wa=
likely = destroy religious freedom and tylelri,n.
a1I we = complete s~i.l4,i5n % the rights gfc5r-
V-z:e and I.iv.;e property, L-ius intimately
connected with al ace VI -V--.a;.-a AMI danger
ol-. Hitherto tley had teea followed by civil
war o. -sme.hir- worse. L was q form u con
f~-e4ti.n and only enriched Land 0vUer=-
Tie strength oE Ireland. continued tie late
premier. j. Le- cs1re--l5u with England. ma
j9.i;y q! tie I--h people are Disseminated, but a
settlement Of the Church question would be suf-
c.ea: u slie; tle.- discomfort. The land question
required settlement al-l. Tie details Of this
scheme were complicated and de.usige. and the
Tre-eut engagements o. tie Government with tic
holders Of ve-;aI Interests Oaglt u he paid regg-
larry and promptly q dividends Those engage
Iaeuts we-e COMPRESSED and there could be no
t----=- F."-4------ AE L-.LF@E- --L--
- the M-ynJ5-h College wa= directly in oyp1si-
zion % tie preamble Of tie bill.
Nlr. Di=raeli deprecated tie course Of tie I-es-
ent Government, o. anrag,ni-tic u tie former
policy u 5as Wing party. who-s aim was civil
and religious freedom. lie expressed lis belief
tlar the Bill was my=t dangerous 70 tie country,
bur te.t liz: IL could depend upon Providence
and tie patriotism Of Parliament. He ;aen
moved -fa- The bill DC rad : second time SIX
months i-Jm today.
VIM. II. GregJry, member for Galway. ILJwci
n reply, but did not uureserveily support tie
bill. lie thought an equitable division Of church
property among tie three religious parties prefer
able = tie present scheme Of distribution.
III the cio~s. the debate was postponed I'll tie
23i OF March, when i wac resumed before an IN
usually full House. It having been understood
tLat the measure would be brought 10 . vote,
every available SPACE was occupied, and the mJ=t
intense interest manifested in the result.
The debate vas opened ou tie part Of tie op-
pasiti,a, ~ Spencer Il. WaIIole, member for
CaMJri5-e, who spoke against tie measure. The
o Dyuo-huc. an Irish member from Tlalee. next
made q warm and ier,id speech il It's favor. Mr..
Hardy, one Of tie opposition members, followed
l--% ---r -@ .+@-- ~ '~ -
followers 10 tie destruction ofaL that was most
sac.ei-to the destruction Of tie ChuEch-urged
~ envy auii@lou=y.
Mr.. Gladstone, tie premier and author Of the
bin. next ro-e. and in ole u his mastery efforts,
tie debate. renewing the various parts Of
the bill. AMI tie arguments, PRO and con. lie
declared Tat tie new policy vas necessary for
Ireland. Ills vas the fret step demanded by the
unanimous voice Of the majority. Gladstone r.
=uIled Dis scat amid Lealeuing cheers.
lie Commons theu divided on the motion 10
pas tie bill ou IL second TeadiE--3ls ayes u
30 n5e-a majority Oils for Government. The
announcement was greeted with cheer from every
.a9t % the House, ana the l3bbie iliueI in and
-cI Gated the cheers. The news. say- the tee
,=rl. vas Jhu- conveyed - tie immense crowd
outside. unable o. obtain entrance Who joined Ia
he applause with the wille-t enthusiasm. Tie
Gene shows tie iuJers, which the public tAer.
- taken iu this great national question. which
.as been decided =, lar o. the Commons are con-
.erucI. lie House then Adjourned TIL April lst.