The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1869-05-07
EGIS & IN'rELLIG ENCER,.
BEL AIR, Md, MAY, Z, 1859.
The Circuit Court.

were discharged on Saturday last. Their
timc while in session, was chiefly taken mp
with the investigation of two or three i'm
portant cases. During their deliberations
they found four bills of Indictment, among
which there was one for murder. Since our
Inst report closed the following proceedings
have taken place:
james G Sellman W.. Vanuiver & Hoke,
action on the case; referred to VIM Fl. Dali
lam for adjustment; Farpandis for plaintiff,
Stump for defendants.
Whitelock & Co. vs. JOhn Shaw action
on the case; judgment by agreement. s.
Archer for plaintiff. Whaland for defendant
Edwin Walter VS., Samuel Galloway; action
80 the case; removed to the Superior Court
a Baltimore city, on the affidavit of the
lN.svntiff Boarman, Carter and Stump for
s5la7ntiff, s. Archer and Galloway for defen-
dant
Hugh c. Whiteford VS.. West Bangor Slate
Manufacturing Company; action on the
case Judgment on terms to be fled Fl. w.
Archer and Stump for plaintiff, s. Archer
and Jarrett for defendants.
John Richardson and Others vs. r. and A..
Cooley; action on the case. In this case the
jury was sworn and after the trial had pro-
crossed for some time, the plaintiff moved to
amend the proceedings, whereupon the de-
PENDANTS filed an affiadivit asking for cons
tinuance, and juror was withdrawn and
the plaintiffs then filed an affidavit for reno
val, and the case was removed to Baltimore
county for trial. Hopkins and Thomas for
plaintiffs, 81. w. Archer and Stump for de-
PENDANTS.
ding action on the case; referred to ii. ID.
Farnandis and A. Fl. Jarrett. Farnandis for
plaintiff, Jarrett for defendant.
Joshua Bosley VS.. ]. T. Bradford action
on the case referred to II. d. Farnandis.
Thomas for plaintiff, Maynadier and Munni-
khuysen for defendant.
John Dutee vs. Duncan and Butler; action
on the case; judgment by default. Jarrett
for plaintiff, no appearance for defendants.
Edward Golden VS.. August Sauerland; re.
plevin tried before the Court; judgment for
plaintiff, for property and one cent and dam
ages and costs. Stump for plaintiff, Gilbert
for defendant.
Michcner's Executor vs.. d. and J. Deck
man action of debit entered off by agree
ment. Van Bibber. for plaintiff, ii. W. Ar
cher and Jarrett for defendants.
Michener's Executor VS.. ]. and d. Deck
man action of debt; judgment by agree
ment. Van Bibber for plaintiff, II. W. Ar
cher and Jarrett for defendants.
M. ]. Cairnes VS.. Nicholas McComas &C
ton ON the case; abated. Maynadier and
Stump for plaintiff, no appearance for defen-
dant.
r. B. Mccoy VS. Deckman and Others; &C
ton on the case judgment by confession,
Farnandis for plaintiff, II. ". Archer and
Jarrett for defendant.
Rose, Lyon g. Cos Assignee vs.. Joseph
Elbthal; action on the case; judgment on
terms filed. H. w. Archer for plaintiff
Lee for defendant
Jeremiah Aler VS.. Wiley e. Whitney; 40
ton on the case; Judgment by default
Gilbert for plaintiff, no appearance for de-
PENDANTS
Dinsmore 81 Kyle VS.. Geo. Mcfarland
action on the case Judgment by default
Stump and Maynadier for plaintiffs, no ap-
pearance for defendant
Carl Erdman vs. j. Allen; action on the
case Judgment by agreement. Jsr t for
plaintiff, Farnandis for defendant.
Harriet B. Hays VS.. Heaton and Devoe;
action on the case judgment by default.
Archer d Van Bibber for plaintiff, no appear
ance for defendant.
Lewis Myer VS.. J. W. spicer; action ON
the case; Judgment by default Street, for
plaintiff, no appearance for defendant.
Al. Streets Administrator vs.. John Street,
action on the case; Judgment by default
STREET. for plaintiff, no appearance for defen-
dant.
State, use of County Commissioners, vs.
Malcolm and others; action of debt; judy
ment with leave to assess damages. Thomas
for plaintiff no appearance for defendants.
State, use of County Commissioners Vs.
Dean and others; action of debt; judgment
with leave to execute writ of enquiry
Thomas for plaintiff, Van Bibber for defen-
dants.
State, use of County Commissioners, VS..
L. y. WorthingtoD and others; action of debt;
judgment for $51.28 with interest from the
first day of September, 1885, Thomas for
plaintiff, Price and 8. Archer for defendants
Porter d Son VS. Knight & Hanson action
on the case; Judgment by consent. Gilbert
for plaintiff, Farnandis for defendants.
G. w. Wonders VS.. H. A. & J. Ward &C.
ton on the case judgment by default. Ar
cher d Van Bibber for plaintiff, no appear
ancc for defendants.
Amos Baughman VS.. John W. Anderson :;
action on the case; judgment by default
Archer d Van Bibber for plaintiff, no apear-
ance for defendant
j.. A. Milburn VS.. s. M. Magraw; action
ON the case; Judgment by consent. Stump
for plaintiff, Van Bibber for defendant
SCOTS Executors VS.. B. Mitchell action
on the case; judgment on terms Farnandis
for plaintiff, Gilbert for defendant.
b. Ii. Lee VS.. s. Bond action ON the case;
Judgment by default. Archer & Van Ribber
plaintiff, no appearance for defendant
Hamilton Lefeyer vs. Benjiman Cromwell;
attachment on judgment; abated. Jarrett
for plaintiff, Stump and Maynadier for defen,
dant. Fn -
Benjamin Goodwin VS.. Olivia Knight; &C.
ton on the case entered off by order of
plaintiff. Jarrett for plaintiff, no appearance
for defendant. r. - -,
.)aniel Scott vs.. Ady and Ward action on
the case; docketed by consent, and agree
ment for Judgment filed Scott for plaintiff.
Farnandis for defendants.
State of Maryland vs. Robinson and Others !;
action OF debt judgment by agreement, with
interest from date. Rutledge for plaintiff.
5. Archer for defendants.
State of Maryland vs.. McComas and 9th
ers; action of debt; entered off by order of
plaintiff. Rutledge for plaintiff, no appear
ance for defendants.
State of Maryland VS.. Johns and others ac-
ton OF debt; countermanded. Rutledge for
plaintiff, no appearance for defendants
same vs.. same; action of debt; counter
manded. Rutledge for plaintiff, no appear
ance for defendants.
G. +. Cooley VS.. Malcolm and others: &C.
ton OF debt judgment by consent. H. w.
Archer for plaintiff
=. George Wonders VS.. William George: an.
al from magistrates Indictment. entered