The Cairo evening bulletin. (Cairo, Ill.) 1868-1870, 1869-04-08

HON. d. J BAKER, JR., JUDGE.


Wednesday, April tth,-rhird day; Forenoon.
The People, &C., vs. Michael e. Powers,
assault to 90 bodily injury; nolle enter
ed.
Hamilton Hargis vs.. VIM. Inman, APP
peal; rule to file appeal bond. $3.50
Scott White We. John e. Mercer, at
tachment; default entered.
r. b. Ellis Il Bros, VS.. Alfred Cutting,
assumpsit; continued by agreement.
Bernard Smyth vs.. Andrew Cain, as
sumpslt; Judgment against defendant
Ellis Il Meredith VS.. Alfred Cutting, as
sumpsit; continued by agreement.
Bernard Smyth VS.. John Potts, assump-
sit; judgment against defendant for
He. Howard d Co., vs.. I. L. Harrell,
assumpsit; default entered.
VIM. II. Schutter VS.. Michael Hewett,
assumpsit; judgment against defendant
for 1855 65.
jeanette Hudson VS.. ]. X. Frick, as
sumpsit; defendant enters his appear
ance and continued.
II. d G.. Soule d Co., VS.. Taber d Jor-
dan, assumpsit; judgment against de-
PENDANTS.
Adolph Blum vs.. II. Herscher, assump-
cit; judgment against defendant for $13l.
Satchel G. Dore vs.. Ill. Cen. Il R., Co.,
case by agreement set for hearing on the
23d inst.
John NJ. Graham VS.. II. A. Harmon.
assumpsit; Judgment against defendant.
Robert w. Miller VS.. VIM. Barker, as
sumpsit; default entered.
III. NJ. Hulen VS.. II. II. Fox, assumpsit;
default entered.
G.. +. Myer W.. Knight & Lester, as
sumpsit; judgment against defendants.
Jenkins d Co., vs.. John p. Gibson, as
sumpsit Judgment against defendant
NJ. D. Gunter vs.. A. c. Anterior, as
sumpsit; continued for service.
Joel J. Baily & Co., VS.. Mrs. A. Barber
assumpsit; judgment against defendant.
Morris, Thornton d Field, VS.. Charles
Thrupp, assumpsit; judgment against de-
fendant
William Johnston vs.. Mary Johnston,
bill for divorce; decree pro confesso, and
referred to Master.
The People VS.. Perry Powers, con-
tempt Of court; fined $40.
"wednesday, April Tth, Third day-Af,ernoon.
The people VS.. James Oman, robbery;
| Jury found defendant guilty, and fixed
| his term in the penitentiary ut one year.
VIM. NJ. Williams, admir-, VS.. John
Hogan, repleyin; first count In declara.
| ton quashed.
Thomas Winter, for use, &C., VS.. Jacob
Lehning, punishment; judgement We.
defendant for Sis 80.
VIM. II. Schutter VS.. Michael Hewitt,
attachment; judgment vs.. defendant for
$3.50 81.
Anderson Meacham VS.. Wilmot G.
Munson, ct ais. foreclose Of mortgage;
| appearance Of defendants entered.
THURSDAY, April sth-Fourh Day, Forenoon.
Pussy Wickersham, for use, &C., We.
q p. Garner, ct ais, garnishment; non
suit.
Gross & Rozler vs.. Stewart & Co., as
sumpsit; non-suit.
Pussy Wickersham, for use, &c, VS..
G. p. Garner, ct ais. (; non-suit.
Hamilton Hargis VS.. William Inman,
appeal; rule TO file appeal bond
John $. Hawkins, for use, &c., VS..
Henry II. Spencer, garnishment dis
missed by plaintiff
Smith & Beggs vs.. Williams, ct ais,
mechanics lein; leave 10 amend inter-
pleaders OF Thomas and Warren * Co.
Barton Robinson VS.. John w. Trover,
assumpsit; motion TO quash writ over.
ruled.
William Kluge VS.. John G. Miller, ct
ais, assumpsit; demurrer to declaration
overruled.
Mathew d. Gunter VS.. Aaron c. Ather-
ton, assumpsit; continued for service.
Michael Hewitt, for use &C., Va. Jacob
Lehning punishment, judgment VS.. de-
fendant for S3i5 So. $50 ff-Ff
David o. Deshler vs. Geo. b. Hicks ct
TX; bill for general relief; masters final
report approved.
Taylor 4 Parsons VS. Chas Sego; ven.
doris lien. Dismissed by plaintiff.
Taylor Il Parsons VS. Nicholas Will
liams: vendors lien. Dismissed by
plaintiff
Taylor q Parsons VS. Frank Williams;
vendors lien. Dismissed by plaintiff.
Taylor IL Parsons VS. Hiram Stewart;
vendors lien. Dismissed by plaintiff.
Taylor & Parsons VS.. Ellen Shorteil,
vendors lien; masters final report APP
Taylor & Parsons VS.. Catharine Nc
Kane, vendors lien; masters final re-
port approved. \.
Taylor x Parsons VS.. John Finn, ven-
Taylor Il Parsons vs.. Luther X. Parks,
vendors lien; masters final report APP
proved.
VIM. johnson VS.. Mary T. Johnson,
divorce; divorce granted as prayed.
William Bradshaw VS.. Margaret Brad
shaw, Divorce; decree, pro confesso, and
referred to master TO take proofs.
Siphronia II. Farmer VS.. David n. Far
mer, divorce; decree, pro confesso, and
referred TO master TO take proofs.
Mr., G. Winston returned from New
Orleans per steamer Richmond this
l. ~ n