The Kenosha telegraph. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1860-1888, 1869-05-20

ii longs to the present question. Ihe NOR
81 sense is disturbed by such process al
IIany stage of the trial; nor is it satisfied
6gthe subsequent provision for the selec
ttfoh of a sovereign of a friendly state
asa tbitrator. The treaty mot merely
makes no provision for the determination
of the great question, but it seems to pro
vide expressly that it shall never hereaf
ter be presented. The petty provisior
for individual claims subject to set OF
| from herindividual claims of England
SO that in the end our country may posi-
bly, receives nothing, is the consideration
Tor this strange surrender / borrow
/ term Of '-anaEnglish statesman on another
occasion, if L call it "capitulationg FOR
Che settlemehtaof few individual! CLAIMS
I'VE eohdohe the2original, far-reachlng ana
obstructive wrong. Here are the plain
sWordslby which this is done:
= "Thc high ie0nefacting parties engage
| TO cUnsider, the result OF the proceedings
Eof this commission as full and final set
Element Of every claim upon either gov.
eminent arising out of any transaction OF
date prior to the exchange OF the ratln-
cations of the present convention, ana
further engage. that for every such claim
whether or not the same shall have been
presented to the notice of, made, prefer
red, OF laid before the said commisslcn y,
bYbaIls from. and, after the conclusion of
Esl,e proceedings of. the, said commission,
| be considered and treated as finally set
tied led and barred and thenesf0Fth lnadmls
salAT this, T quote4from the, treaty; It is
lartieleifYe. !, The national cause; is handled
as nothing more thana bundle. of indiyid-
ual claims, and The result ofthe proceedings
under the proposed treaty is to be S"full
and final. ettlement,"', SO that hereafter all
claims shall he considered and treatedas
finally settled, and,barred, and thencefolFth
inadmissible. IS Here is no. provision for
the ZEAL question, which, though thrust
out of sight, or declared TO be, finally. set
tied and barred" according to the terms
of. eetreatY, must remaint to. plague 1.-THE
two countries. hateyer the treaty may
ssadyy HI terms. there Isl no, settlement in
fadtaand until this is made, there Willis q
constant menace Of tdlscord, Nor can 1T
be forgotten that there is no recognition N
ofthe rule of interpatiopal DUTY, aPplieahs1e
III such cases. sc, too, is left unsettled.
While doing little for ps, the treaty kFfAs
ampl for al, 4kploWn claims on 2.
the British side; these are iexcllslV We
n Individual sst til III are GSomplet GOV
.eFed bJff ths. text which has no limitations
orsexcePt ions 1readY it ,iisy, ANNOUNCED 1snr
sinsEglahd(L that sven tAose OF the Eo9n s
fedeE8ta hondhol derS afe ;lncsllsd1sar
have befhra me-; On English jepriia! MAheh
sdescffB& Latter plRi ms yaf totndiesd qn
sifnniA nse. quaptitiess of cotton. worth ct
the time ofs thesseisure nearly stw99t shils5.
lings per pound ! " hfeh were then, in r, the
Iegaff po,ssssessioir of The bondhol ders;r
Spd Ithb same authority s dds .sthese Claims
will he breqght, indiifferently with others,
before, the, joint commission NJ when
eyer IT shall sit}nn From another source
'learn that these bondhol dsrs ia very
safigaine, of success ynnd Ter the treaty as it
ris sg0gsaed, and certain it is that the / loan
went up from @ to21 as soon d At Il was
ascertained that the treaty d WAS & 81 gnead !"
T@dd6btlif the American people are ready
ijslst 4l6M to provide; for any such claims,
Bhat,theyf Via nave risen ii the market is an
argument assinststhe treaayssts'tffse tstsF
'iasTlnRr es4sRaA eAsasr DNesl,ANp'rt&iase
from the treatg.I, bone now. to
consider briefly. butWith proper precision
The true true! gsrJundsof EompfaihEs ana there
Again Il WEI 81 NYses thee instant inadeqna=
DcJ se4ie remedy now applied, It is with
tRat ieneeF bdfkst ishisl state
anant. an Enthusiastically Sdischarg eaJofsa
duty Which, cannot h. pastp ored Hose ~
S u sns 9HE s3ef tRs b0mBSrdsa
Fort sg4seE, fsw Ke4 tthso fsbel Hon sl~as
still undeYelo ,wibenthe abieGlat taoY;
erment beginning those glGaHf14G 10 sl Esi
forts which ended SO triumphantiy, me
eourtrN was startled by the news that tie
British hXdinterTtn Bdsby prbcianiation
which Observation-Disclosures rights iER ths
Etsbels TBS Tbs ea early date NheYP fhis Nas
the close. without Ships on sfe soesah
without prize cntrts orsothertribnnaisfto
administer justice anl the ocean III lffholsSt
I4aaf1v Of those copdi tions which oare, tbs
essential vi preredu ties to such o. seoheGs
sion; and ySythel conc essiUhS was GENERAL
being applicable to the ocean andy Tire
land, 81 that BIZ British fat they became
beAigegeentss as wei 81 1apa nel1lgs
iarentSS I'm the SWIlIASoo ~ ILLS uToc Nv ~
there was very aitsse considerations f5fs d
friendly Power; nor does ID Rnpaar,that
Fthere was inquiry int the efpAaitions
I precedent. on which It must depend
lsh0ccanebeiillfge eHccy Bsing factts6 afit
aaot,a acknowledgement ecsgai5ed only
on 1 esyfidepes,sho wing ass sctaaa iaxistsnee
1accofd{ng to the Fple, fist fftated b. .Nr
'4Ganhina, ana, AFTERWARDS recognized h5
: Earl RUSSELL But no such Svi va
ssJaddleed, for it did potaeSiFt, and pexH1
existeaa Too ,ntle q stresscannot be laid
4 upon thelrule, that belligereney is 90 fac
land not g principle = i Is perhaps, tht
..l,of the Gtselarevohitjon, deesAohoa toait,
cussi 81 ana its ossigipa9 statgpeen5 the %
aasisn aut hor ,unqu stiona63y tbe bElg6tesi