The spirit of democracy. [volume] (Woodsfield, Ohio) 1844-1994, 1869-06-01
Proceedings OF Monroe County
Common Pleas COUrt---uaJ,
Term, 1860. +i' ST.

,,,.-.,. $50 -+-fS'--' - : ri -t-f-'
~ 'A'' ''1' ->'"' w. .s..- rs - r.as Il Vt,
S. Grimshaw, admir-, vs.. L. w. Mat
lthews, admir-. Dismissed at costs OF
plaintiff =s ,L 81
Nancy Walton VS.. Arch'd Goodhue,
Cause and recognizance continued.
III. Anderson VS. Mineral Hill Co.
Dismissed at costs of plaintiff.
H. I, Dennis VS. d, Rhodes, Dismi.s
ed at costs of plaintiff. .-...,,.
Mary j. Coen VS. Stephen Coen. Dis
missed at costs of defendant.
s. Trigg, admir-. VS.. II. Dennis ct al
Judgment against def't for Sl2S 10.
Ohio VS.. Bridgcman. Assault with
intent to murder; causc,and recognizance
continued
Elizabeth Prewett VS.. T. Mccoy ct al
Partition; estate taken at appraisement,
81, 200, by plaintiff. S s.
E. c. Battler VS.. Flora Blair. PART
ton; estate taken at appraisement, ST.
700, by plaintiff. a atEhRS s
Peter Mellott VS.. Wm Mellott ct al
Partition; estate taken at appraisement,
$4,000, by plaintiff Es 4 az
Daniel Bishop VS.. Margaret Bishop
Divorce granted. ,-. ,-,.- ar
F. A. Lamping VS.. 3. Johnston. Judg-
ment. revived. G-r 5l.=ss-sg
Williams & Westvs. G. L. Tyler sexE
Judgment revived.
Andrew Snyder VS.. S. Payne, admir-.
Judgment revived.
Ohio vs!IJohn Sparks etal: Peace
warrant; defendants discharged.
Indictments were presented by the,
Grand jury, as follows, g9i saF .hsa-r,
Against AVm DALEY for assaMlting an
officer.
Against VIM. Shriver and Jos, Swear
ingen for petit larceny. Two bills.
AgainstlJos. Swearmgen for petit lar
ceny.
Against Borden Gibbons for poisoning
q colt.
Against Borden Gibbons orpoisoning
q bull. s. rsrusps e-0nsg PA ara
ID. Lively's ferry license was renewed.
Ohio. VS., VIM, Daily. Plea, of guilty
to assault and battery; indictment mol
lied as to resisting officer; fine $40 and
costs. Is5,sa sdJ s'ieag7l 81 -seis VIZ
John Abersold vs. A. Henthern ct al.
Decree correcting deeds.
Ohio vs.TShr8er aud Sweariugen..
Petit larceny; nollie entered on first in
dicthetit goy aid % smu 7aor a .soH beh
Ira Brague VS. t. C. bKyger and wife.
Judgment for S1,662, and decree fore
closing mortGage. iaSToT ssssosR
John Wilson vs. Mary Conger ct al.
Decree guietihg plaintiff title.aA
( The Grand Jury reported the Jail kept
in good condition, and recommend teu
ing away the wooden kitchen and build
ing brick one, and other min or i'm
nrova nronts = . r 4 Il . ..
John. Morris vs.. 5. Valentino Stephens,
Appeal; verdict for plaintiff So so.
, Genin's Ex'rvs S. jackson and wife.
Judgment for -S2,647 10, and decree Of
foreclosure = ~ i.-a zoo - a 5.-5 pr
Genin, Ex'rYss. S. Brothers and wife
Judgment for 81, 159 50, and decree of
foreclosure. torsiNgoi ,in2raEif SO sgseIa,
Genin's Ex'r VS.. 6. B.. Mitchell. Judg-
ment for g, ,54s AZ and decree of fore
closure. -sylE ia tr,-r n, s.lsl -
Gemn's Ex'rs VS. d. Mccoy. aJudg-
ment for $S6l so, and decree of fore
closure EoJ zs1 q - Elu0 aaEII
.Ganin's Ex'r2 vs..s. H. Petty. Jadg-
ment for 1881 %, and decree of fore.
closure. 80 aTe 3eszslft3--g0S'Ets
Gemn's Ex'r VS.. j. Dearth and wife
Judgment for 1929 S63, and decree of
foreclosure. --
Genin's Ext VS.. John Satfie ct nj.
Judgment for 1896 80, and decree of
foreclosure.
Genin's Ex'rs vs. VIM. ID. Pennell!
Judgment for 1856 10, and decree of
foreclosure. s, l.'.5 !, '.si .-., - a.15 74
Genin,s Ex'r VS.. j. Mcmahon ct al.
Judgment for S1,275 3d., and decree Of
foreclosure. ~ fs.ss7ss.f yi---st
Genin's Ex'r vs.. VIM. White ct al.
Judgment for S943 65, and decree of
foreclosure iold .1if2sas
Genlns EX'rvs. Thos Gillespie ct al.
Judgment for 81 ,241, 80, and decree OF
foreclosure.
Genin's Ex'r VS.. VIM. Myers ct al
Judgment for 81 500 80, and decree OF
foreclosure. pa ,*'Ha12 so'"'is 70 al
Genin,s Ex,s vs.. Alex. Young ct al
Judgment for 81 ,S13 and decree Of fore.
closure. 4ssa aid soy l,sl.g ri 5.,1., s,,,,
| ;uGeninlss Ex'r VS.. j. N Mitchell ct al.
Judgment for 1852 DO, and decree OF
| foreclosure. 25ols earedi a5su 81 NO ss0
Thomas Wright vs. Jared dsdSoles.
SANDER; verdict for 5000 second trial
demanded O.a, y ,''"o es'si .. f2hs,4 2,
L. Huffman vs., c. Eichelberry, Decree
for plaintiff establishing will Of Philip
Huffmanasl'sN ~ iI5Rsis ulott saisuu
E.B. Iong & Co VS.. Jes.oIWehIs
Homestead ordered to be reassignea.lH
Ohio VS.. Borden Gibbons. Indictment
for poisoning colt defendant plead not
guilty recognized to next term in S1OO
Ohio VS., Borden Gibbons Indictment
for poisoning aybuH defendant. plead mot
guilty !; recognized to next term i'll SlOQ
eaPancoast. & Pontius VS.. Horkheimer d.
CO. /, Appeal verdict for plaintiffs s32 "
Ohio vs.. Shriver & ,Swearin9en. 9 Petit
1 ! ,f1,, n, 10C