, 1869-12-12

ConA!tutkouality sf The <sslh Park Acs-
Threats OF Stirring Gp Llsik4,tsp-Prtres
In San FFanrf.es Csmpared with
Gh'caKa PFicer-PFogFess OF
fEtces for LAAnlIe stfeet
PFoper3-lkfaS E.In1n
Ttanafers for the
Week.

AHsNts ~ WALK AA0 o. TIC PARKS
In that dlstrc,, there would seem 10 be no excuse
r.,,d.g ~ ,hs ,.o.. ~ W. up nsanoa ABOUT me
aataof1zes The PARK Commissioners to proceed IN
tain cla.s Of pcr,ous Who in err,, % t,ns -, nn.,
ns'A seeo,s 70 nc teeanicaEtes OF the law, and
seeA 70 i0Ake money Dy threatening to commence
,ess. proeeellnss In this li1e Of business. . man
ar three v.ek, .gn n ~ ,.a,.t c.. w c.,'
Cas.. 80 - asV He Nu''ea seases circuit
proceedings Of tee South razk Coputtuoners in
the Ac1ul!eCent or s.t!e to the ls,n for ,he
marx, on ,De cruund that The ut AZ rne 1s.,.s..
~ ~ e.oG Nt Ate ~ " INC AeS'aa~-
tule iot tne e1sannatnent OF the parks WIS un-
coratiusional. Everybody will remember thsr 1t
co1,4 nj TIA s,s.. .r,rrs, ~
~. cn',s y, ~ AuA e ~. u.susasuuonalty Oh
1ne r., Soatn rafx sss and tetled that question
%! II secms tnat tne stec6Ia'oEs, represented BY
helr thtught there might be sui : chauce to
Ge1e some touos About The matter, anA that
snsped Il o;xe sc moss o. nsssa Sas b. a
20 nave the matter cropped. The object IN nlnV
the bill In the Cptttd States Circuit Court
seems 70 nave been 70 create The inl;rts-
I'll questions touching the force md l1ntation of
States Statutes might be reversed In q United
States Court X Is not probable that the 1pecnia.
tors IN this case contemplated ever pushing the
matter to Judicial dectlon; but eyen nad such
been shes intention. Il Is quite certain that they
IN
Court of The Cnited States has aectied. tnat in
cues nke this, the uniled States Courts hare no
n9snS'} nss CON-! % ssgss e ,se he 2 tas 81
q the United States IL .ae c,se q Ledanexen -.
et1on OF he Coaft vas: '-1e ''e'
II. The Conrts Of the United ssates, II absence
q es,satnn on the subject By CooeEssa, recognize
the statutes OF limitations OF the seyefsI Statcs
and gtye them the sarno Construction and efrsrt
a shs, are given By the local tribunals,
M tt s,sn te Safe statute
as pnrt OF the statute, and IS ~ bIndtor On lne
Untsed States Courts u tho text, -
as. II tbs highest judicial ts.hupa! Of 4 Stale
adopt new 7ieVs . 10 tue proper rontsTuct,on OF
srch statute Aud reverse t9 Former decsiona this
court {Supseue Court Of the Tnited staten vii
II will sppeaF nom the foregoing r4,c,al de-
ctsionA, thai there Is no posslble chance to DIS
iaIo the Establishment oi tae south PARK. ii he
mind 10 as 10 interfere WIN The sa!e Of the nsrk
bonde. which ihe Commes,oners sfr,,,oE o7er,n1
psst Of tse Co "a M on 'le 1e
much Of b,scf.ma,Iue A. the RespRirn, q Gsss.,fs
ieaai imSston ~ ,aA ,ha thrs.ia Us sows
III m sti.ea,ion nnnn i1-nt S..n9 ~
s1ouna. = sp.ssin n sst.oa There .. Sa. ho1e9sf
sahamt,S tn NAY mnnr1 ~ sfrn rnn,ea ~ n9t
~ NAV hel;rre ~ S"m.n y ns..sg.,s 90, ~ ~
.no,e Tne rsola ;s ~ 2 .ts tas
M. "a tnn nnS,rIy cnnn.rteH E;sn ...na nIan
in snra.sT Th.s rrmnHs M ~ say ~ Ess E,.u
rsntI.T., fs e n,3s s+s1. s NC a.t aaMs sae
nf;s,s-,ts ssheM. W. do nnq nnas .ns
1ss Nj. Gassette.s ieesi adviser IN tass W enter
pe on, ~ IT sHA 1norIsage e. ~ sae o5i2 ss9t.l y.
he sentiemAu IN btga standinT W.s tsWser. ''@<
M59eS 9as1 'Sns q y
nr,ees o1 a,1ne1,1 n an nwr e1 uS ,sas ~ "
oiss1 este II Ill ~ oonseco1 9 " VT LAVE e1e seea