, 1869-06-24


cr sooke Of the subject Of the homicide 10 Nj
MurfaY. thouVh have to Mn, MQrTny,
.Re- -dirsef: When passing my house, ! noticed
In Thtte bandagr-
NJ ase, + Ss9t ss I'D H. Te e Ra,Isv tst
lived LIVED % Just opposite to her house iast faiI Il
e siass.lE sa@ lin 'hsss Tc g Of thfss tlmes
T+nsae1aminatia.a Saw him at the t,nuse IN thu
| afternoon. MV nnnse IN m fhe nnrth sffe of fhe
street, and 1IfS Bailey:s house On tue opposite
NrH 1,atieT = hnuse are near to each other.
"1N''' 1''>3~3 Es1MoSY n or MS. BoS1FAcK.
Ars Aaixfas Bonifaet, s.ro1n :: ire in Naper.
IA directly onposite ME. Baifeyi house. Llyej
there iast' till SAN a tall man. whom did not
know, 20 into her house. His lace was wrapped
in hanffE Eerchiefa NaW rim "a ttere tv1ce. EaU
reme1nher seeinr him at M t1fner tlule SaE him
20 INTO the honse In the afternoon Did not see
Elm come ont, and do not Know how long be
STAYED. Nj. Ba1IeT was not then at home; 10 not
SnGT where he was. 'N~'
A X1ssIso w1TfKss
Peter Burns, Wituess, was next called, but
failed to put ID an appearance. Judge Cody, Of
fhe council for the defence, stated That he {the
wltuesB, had been N Chicago drinking very hard,
and probsby would not show himself until forc,.
bly, brought into court
TESTIMONY OF THOMAS FINLEY.
Thomas Ftnkg. recalled {1y III: Van Arman):
tHo years ago, TO 60 with him to NRperville- l
lived four miles from there- She waa then at my
house, on ytalt. When she left Fowler'A where
sne WaS ooafolog, do not EnnW Where ahe went.
The night On which The homicide occurred might
have eeen clondJ DID not pay much attention to
the condition Of the weather. Was At tho house
q Bafey on the day following the homicide On
hetNeen and ~ o'clotk+ tie came 1or me 10 go
With him.
II. rdn r7aa't What ga he say TO you7
t0b]ected 90 hy state a Attorney Metzner.l
W. Fan Ar7adn claimed that the question WAS
Wild, In adduc.ng evidence TO illustrate the provo
fstioa n,g ne aomlcde y III BAILEY ana bis Mfe wess
been witness before the grand Jury, showing
what reliance the people had IN him. AZ the De.
IN reference to the provocatlon of the deed. Iii
conversation Immediately after the act Was cer-
ta!nly legitimate means Of proving the provoca.
tton. The defence claimed TINT Baileg,a mind
conversation With the witness vas admsable -
illustrative OF thai point The gentleman then
eis 1Staox, t. , ezk,x O. tho prosecution mi, nm,
ne pInsiPiss Ias9!ssd Il i I'll qaesi!oa hsa essn
ros n sn ast ~ese
appeared, to introduce through this Witness What
t cea @ the o. a,s 1s; aet
Isaa, saae mnen ~ ~ stua1 M E'en ume frame
a.. ~ es M ~. ns ~ ~ s4GH anntea lnto
- sSsarnd - n ~ ~ t,t 1usaSe oe4!4 uot
rs ,sa.. sas7f =, i, 1 1uy t1oluel case al
s'iss3nr' ~ mn-9ar sEara VI com
n15 ~ sa sase ~ The HALEY ses
~ 1ho 1np1ior ,np1S ~. n%H nnt R o St
,ronld III seIte ia shieid 1 lin, oe ~ 7oen
MT. TGn 4 rraert fhnnoht tha, rho aer+.v NJ tho
defendant Tas in tss and the s1e
tween hin, md FjnIey Tas conneient "a iIy1,ags.
Ths rnUrf Tt,ie,t that tha sr1anca ,po. ,c,,n,,o
tent. lie feiI tfe re.ponsibiiitT of Scciitnr iSe
pont at issue but the fsW Ia i3at paftlcpiaf vas M
reaT AZ showing thst whatnTer had haan setd " - T."
tae aeienuant aitef tne commission OF INC decd
W. nd noE a ~ ~ a oMn 'a'o s
nm at nv Sonse. Vas very mnch e9ctsa e1 VIII ~
he rsnped. be ID 40 a. il he Wantsti to hreak in
taeHsss i was 81 so9e o. Gag 3 man ~ os'A IL
cn1a Ia ;ost 6ie os w. " eA
W;eua,s axs r. , ~
two q sn1ec ainu'es az aad daIius that u Sae oqs ne
~ p, n. .ne o+.,r s..ns .,o. ..,
,na tonrn-Ea,in ha!aao .ha -. .i H. sus y,
csidence in orIer 10 ustraie tI,e cou5ton oi H.
'en0ant tm1ia4 atn'- c,,.,,,na
iEStteSsea ": s4s@Ie ~ >, a..
front door Of se5 house foani tae To- son
~ ecn.ea AT ~ 6a1enI,nt ars ~. oe,,a,r.
Ing aGu Me11 n3t ac19alnsea
1 Mtnes9 thought ABOUT ne matter was tnc9mPe-
rithcr naTfr re;sttvn n the nconatntsreeah1n 81 ~
ennea a ant'5 ieioatc " 'ne eas1a"a4ns"aees0iP WAS
Witness eontia,..,,. I indre, thu, na,ler md
9a@ Nv. oa!c5 Lne ngas pSloif lne 1umislde, al khe
"a" Wna S Soa a. 70 ta es LIN
shat sr1t.iecf N@'" NNN ''s o15 ~ A1l1 w
Colon,f T.oiltr,t of ttr rn~,r., -,. ~, ns,-,,r
,tnn rfesr.en fha, the nrsastio .us ~ .osssa
Tne witness was TREND Of sietx sna + q
tTeen he nrtie. 10 defei1 sba t ose1 maze q"
dence The evidence o1erefi Tonid ~ oar,s ~ ~
expsin Intimately counested d sih se1's she
see no priacipl Jp6n Whieh such tSTir,a1 ~ s3a!a
Be admltted II wnnd thnoW ~ I'LL sssuay , eoEla
sesua coadon u fscss Dtasely falasd ue1n % th
Syatts Attornty A<t.,,er THOUGHT, TIM. n,,, av,
dence On the pai1 Of The ie{epce tended tn Essato
=. false Impression On the Minds of TIC j1rr. Il
IT vas nos~i should + :ztEot3acc ~ hI ~ toss
tna2E e. aos 6y the defence, This converse.
len s. between the deceased and Finley occurred
sna iSa aSaEs Pf1ss ~ ss q the ur
IN eri1snaa snns .e a;sa ,n1s Mas aeaoerasa
claimed e. ,sf,nst pagRa 0ecaqss It
aanyle t.ne lof passion 70 subs!de and rea5o1 10
tii1i,g henc smay Ge.Ween ne prpyocstoo and the
iaa lie gre6e df 3he oco S;xna ;a1 Of ss9c.
to to, RIsanslaagnter Isa + aE9tsyats! lie % 'Esnee
~ ~ ~1uu me killing TO feelings
tht sesnHn nint tha rnnnaaa sa'oS a. nlut "a
ereIre threw no int an ,se SonsHu9 at,9e ,sas me
INN ~ tho t1.na ~ ~ III .as Asea pt3toca-
eyldenea hsfi m ~ t,a auu @ 'ae4eo1s tne
Tie sonrt tfen adnn1nes ~ ~ ~ rasr rasorv.,
past oelocx a n a'''o'Asa " tec'oSeae III hal1
AffsTTEpSnnv + eres1o>.
The rnnr+ recnnrened ~ SIs2aUs. II 2a1a,
SYat.s Stt,rr.,. Wst.s ~ ons; ~ msuai aout.
Of The forenoon. Thts cougelsa,ton NJ fh
eeei n,oxxa;;on uu ~ =, aeSIce alastfate the
and The fine of ths nerne rni1nn MT Tsa snI
lime for INC mind to hccome % 'I fesfoTed i to its
= NASsSNs 49, tANA