, 1869-04-03


and the further hearing postponed until MONDAY,
at 10 o'clock. The adjournment yesterday was
gnusasl1y early; owing 70 The hsppenlns e = ~.
tifA II wonld SEEN that he stepped upon SONG OBJ
stfucuon left upon the steps OF hls house fell and
snts lumber Jard tes;ticd i!e sxofe sSai ho
pointed out 10 the inspectors Johnson and DJc)
previously sworn. the particular lumber that was
and none other: md that the pte1 exhibited was
Of lumber pils4 In the regular coursc Of business,
and In the manner usual In lumber ynf0i.
THE LAW nF NAkRlA0E.
Ann Er1Astc :, Peter GrAssle or sGr2Ss- THIS Il
srrocccslnE Tor divorce on the ground Of the cru
ely M! drunkenness, In which The marriage Is de-
n!ed, The I'LL In this case waa nlcd. on the 7th
day Of February, 1868 The statement Of the CON-
planant Is that IN June, 1s4S ahe Has married by
New Orleans, since which tltne they tAd lived
together - husband and w. living Ii New O.
.%s o ,S e.7 ss1 mnf save En- t" 10 en-
dcnts, during seven Of which lniervenlnR teArs
he had treated her with e1ren.e cruelty. In spcel
April 1s5., he best Der brosai!., a. veil ~ ia the
then following nlontha and dntinr. PERHAPS, each
succeeding week In Juls. August and September,
1861, she aud The defendant we're living on "the
crib In the lake, herr she Was wholly unprotected,
and 1t u charged that during these months he
frequently beat and ehetedher. The man Il the
owner ot lot s. In z. J, Hnus subdivision Of block
T. Canal Trpssees Subdivision OF Section 81 a. IL
With tuo houaca ION Lnden BsEeep Of tho value Of
1ssd e gns soP Tns
claimed that thcre WIS no marriage, and that the
complainant Is Ire himself, unmarried, Of the
n2rne Of Stewart He asseEA that ahb Was never
nu.c Il, him thnn Mistress vncfcfose he declines
to make An1Ncr to her ch21grs Of Ill treatment,
cruelty, Sc, or 70 the charge Of haosnsl drunken
false, Charging hcr, however, With being false 70
him as mistress, which II hn had not known. he
wss ~ eea sss9sea sem
her.
on the part .of the complainant the ConEt ia-
strntsed The tufJ that ma17tage may be proveA hJ
reputation declarations and conduct Of tho PARTIES
together with such other cttcu1n4tanees as usus1y
accompany that relation, aud Il Is not necessAs! 70
prove It fJ license, certificate or rcsists!, Or b!
calling PERSONS who may have been present II It's
alleged celebration This c4se sets up marriage
oetwten the parties n Scw oceaa. 4, snd N
acknowledgement ef the 1ert>es, cohah!tAtno md
! other ctIcurstnnt!al testimony. Ana II ihe
y his vile Ios long rerlod of time, hid children
By her. Introduced bet into respectable society a.
his wife and declared to hla friends and neanaut
aucea that he was married TO her III New Oylcaus
| these are facts and ctccumssanccs from which the
| turT may infer usa1rtaxo betwcan the parties
RI 1s saf q
parties, IN N~x Orleans, h. Methodist cleEg1-
nan, oz Il tho defendant took the complainant II
ta1c you ii. M Wife, and followed the zane by
| cohsh!t1t1nu With her. then 1ndlnE Of rnarrtast
kn1lr!cnt in this suit between the PARTIES is war.
ranted; wherefore, II extreme aud rrpcate cruel
II b also found divorce MY 60, Which were
Eome hat limited by IN Instruction Eivcu for the
Sesasr "a man M md III Vie IS eSiaenee f1om villa ~
marriage may be presumed, In the ahseDcn Of con
trolling eyfencc on the Other A1da, JET It Is only
rEtxu0pkTe evidence, subject to t,e met by evt
dence on the other side ra.siog nde7snt pm
turupuon.
Ihe tay found sRssS..i rersls. thas the ps1ae.
the defendant h24 been guilty ox extreme and re
peated cruelty.
NV surs
PetttJ J: Bsucck :. Henry md Rahesta Roeaner
/ vt.Sa:.. Wtneheii ', Ma1fl % 1. ' Wne,eu Pro
| ceedinE Ios divorce Ihd cnupt1iaant alleges tnA
! Etnta, on the 18th day 0! April 1855, stnco which
| aase she SAWS her husband has been xuii1y OF cra
city and adultery. The cruelty Is said 70 hav,
cous.s:ed of abuse by AnsoaSe laa Blows and II,
force uscd, It Il alleged, WIS cace 20 great tna
oozarlatnaats rrtss WIS nEosrn. II i fu.tae
deeerted complainant in destitute dlrunssance,
and with IN tnfant child, nj Gla1kaaurE West VII
G,a!A, when she found hin about 70 sal los En-
leaE!nC hAlumote they came TO Chicago IN Feoru
afy last In Chicago the 1cts Of cruelty, It l.
syss:sa TT sr1ea:ea aad !. i cd snas % II.
| her lanxuter vefe rt4uz With defendant IN
sleigh, he demanded OF her tha: soe, SHOULD ais1
papet sitnoaen 1ney xere not sao~n 10 het, an<
! on her refusing 70 Aen, the defendant shsrH he
and the chilli ont Of the vehicle into : kaor bank
>
dessltGte and among tuanGesa On tnat ss1ne d,
| she aaked hin for money Win which 10 pa
t the expenses Of tas child and herseH, .hen he re
| Pied that he would slye her mot d. cent.
iefs hss, snd ahe has not sen hin stnee being let
In such ct1cumstAnccs q Compelled her to N:
heTchUd 10 her friends IN Baltimore. Tncre Ar
| said I'd be txu children OF the mAlztase- The de
ientsnt u represented to be 4 dentist BY rroles
4ion, having N interest IN N odace No l6S Sara
| toSa street B3ltrnntn, where he has 4 basnes
| returning shout {151 per week. It Is Also sala G
| him taas he has opened an otaoe In the city G
| | Chicago Where be now fesides, 4. Nos AID
Lombard Block. The defendant Is stated 70 b
worth about $3a, 600 ahove al indebtedness
kIAI EKIAIk
Frank C. GrAnr1s '. George u. Gfauris It =
. Bu for partition OF The west bali OF southcas
! cuAT9ef Of Section II, Il, H. aod the east hA
Of southwest quarter nfaecdon II, and east ha
al northwest quarter Of Sectton =, u, H. ana th
sonthesH quarter Of the nortaeas1 Q111f<r Of Sex
con H. u, H. '.
EApeEseF Esa1t.
4Eu2xAN3A
Frederick ]. fischer =. Henry C. Ch1lds, JcAs
c Wheaton 1nd E1astus 081!. For 53uNA
Gu1t1vu1 Jordan r. XxthaH Punoelet By Col
fesalou, for y ,osn-
| INV 8CT1S
. James @. Underwood Y. Jacob R S1fpaced. Bel
!. }aiotn J. 8seet Aod John r. BestJ. AasanEss
! DsnaGeA sl-ooo.
- Faret keAoe v CITY o< CnacsEo and tho Cons