Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-01-26
THE COURTS.

MUNICIPAL OURT-GeO. ". WGldT0H,
Judgs This Court commenced yester-
day morning, anu TOOK up the calendar
OF gases specially set for TGesday last,
out very few Of the same were tried.
Three Judgments and as many interlOcu-
tory orders we're entered. Most Of the
cases viii be continued over until to-day.
The calendar below will be called this
morning:
1923 P.ekerell va Carroll.
1901 King VS. H 7rdey.
1905 Joyner vs. Hirsh.
lGl4 Reid vs. Gamer ct al.
lgzE dcKeOn VS. German Casino.
1925 Dcoeachsr VS. Wsddel.
1926 Froth VS. Erone s PaQte.
1882 Andrews VS. Stewart,
1888 Terry vs. Rutland ct al.
1884 MOsby VS. same.
1885 Jones VS. same.
1886 Hunter VS. same.
1851 Tate VS. same.
1913 Rice, Stix & Co vs Flies & Co.
1914 Jones VS. Worpeley Joy d Co.
l645 Jones VS. anne
1916 Hengold vs. Zweiful ct al.
1850 Rock VI Cocsrell.
1861 Carr & Luke VS. Kendig.
1882 McGavock VS. Larkin.
1858 Selby VS. Levy.
1857 Fitz Morriss ss Welch.
1868 Cohen & Co We Cheek.
1867 S~tsbBbsrger ct al VS. Rocco.
1868 MalGtesta va Elliott u &c,
1870 Harrington s. Howell vs. Cross.
1871 Jackson vs Cross.
lU12 Fellman w Mannhiemer.
No. 1898 commenced yesterday, and
will be CONCLUDED early this morning,
after which the above calendar will be
called. Court will convene promptly at
ten o'clock.
CIRCUIT COURT-GeOrge W. Reeves,
Jdde This Court met yesterday morn
ing pursuant to adjournment. The
Grand Jury was empsnneled and
charged by the Court SIS to the faithful
discharge OF its duties under the law.
The Petit Juries were also enrolled, No
other business was transacted, The fol-
loving cases will be called for trial to-
day
, rhieba!d, Griffin 4 Co vs. L V Nor
willie.
4 ] b Sharp & Co We o Coleman & Co.
5 + Johnson, use, VS. b d Majors ct al.
6 VIM English vs. Jno McSheehy.
2 r Chester VS. w B Battle.
S Fletcher & Keck VS. 4 II Douglass.
8 Jno Johnson VS. r l. Smith.
10 VIM Brown VS. w & Nicely.
Ii NJ A McKibbon vs ] J Polk.
II r J Chester VS. VIM Battle.
10 Jas Stillwell VS. f NJ Coleman,
IA r 3 Shore vs. G w Blackwell.
IS J J Smith Il Co. use, VS. W Wood ct al.
IL l. Becker VS. J Kennett.
II B Springfield, admir-, g Wm Ar
mour.
IS w Wilcoxen VS. A Cornell.
10 + w Brooks ct al VS. Miller Price.
% ID Kelley VS. NJ Carlo.
q J Massey We Jas Wilson ct al.
| y w r Slate VS. w d Gather ct al.
% ] Nelson VS. NJ Il r Z.
"a \ Smith VS. J MeGrath.
rs + h ScGggs VS. w Y G Humes, admir-.
% Thomas & Davidson VS. J Thurman.
| q G. \ Sullmsr, admir-, VS. G B Dean.
% w J. Stewart & Bro VS. J s & c g
Mitchell.
% NJ H Chambers vs. Beloate ct al.
30 w r Slate VS. w D Gaithsr.
81 E J. MCGOWAN vs. fhOs Moore.
80 J Il Thomas ,Rdmr VS. Thos H Newell.
80 Bette S~snderlin VS. D n Sanderlin.
81 p Buckley We M d o r II.
IS Cook & Co VS. Chas May etal.
SO J w Leftwich vs. Il w Hines.
| 81 X Is Payne ct al VS. s A Payne.
| 50 w n Aiken & Co VS. H z Treat,
I 80 w Moore VS. X. NJ. johnson.
40 w A CothFan vs. J B Smith.
CHkNCERY CoURT.- Vim. II. Smith,
CaaacellOr.-The following casss will be
heard to-day on motions, pleas, ct ::
Freeman VS. Freemen.
Webb VS. Es.aie or Ksndrin.
Butler Va Johnson.
Briggs VS. Jefferson.
Fearn VS. Doyle.
State, etc. VS. OvertOn Hotel Company.
Oliver VS. McLssn.
Lawrence v5 Singleton.
Meath VS. Meath.
Jones VS. Black.
Jones vs Allen.
The Clerk and Master will take an &C
count to-day in the case of Allen ct 81
VS. 3. Hanks, ct al