, 1869-04-01
United exnteA Circuit Court.

The case OF the Hartford Live Stock Insurance
Company Y Edwin d Marsh q - Sateh m was to r
dire from defendant as General Agent for the
Northwest, whs concluded. The JURY found for
ne Pns 'nIns s,e II nnoa se Condition Of
accountA- 1t appeared that the defendant claimed
other remuneration than had been understood 10
Hc also presented items Of acoount after the lapse
OF two years, and sfter the counany had failed.
when II Tss ssed SsTs ts OF n1s
This made it necessary for The Court to instruct
urun this matter Of accounts and upon this point
men ea al III .sas I DUE s ron s The ss to WON
they render their accounts; what they believe to
be due therefore, II accounts were rendered in
which the claims now tet mp were not mtde, It vas
to be presumed tha. there was an original under
standing thAt there Was no such account existing.
Al the ZANE time, however party ia to be aliowel
were either omission or mistake. The Court also
ruled that where party was called from the prop
es sphere Of his agency to attend TO laoor not .-
c1ndfSl LII The contract or agency he would be en-
titled 70 extra compensation.
IKsCRANcE LAW.
John scanlon :. United States Fire and Marine
Insurance. Company Of Baltimore Action upon
policy Of insurance, to recover 31,sos covering
I1eonnR felt rnAnufActorJ on Ontario street This
case Is analogous IN most particulars 70 to the one
tried On Monday Of the eane plaintiff against the
Union f1rc Insurance Company, also Of halunore.
The policy was dated September II, 1885,. for $40
ge The ss The o The ps11
agreement between plaintiff and TWO other parties,
the MessEA keih on the 1lth day 9! January. ls6s,
a AcopaHncTshlp was formed oy which these TWO
parties we're tsken In and the Interest WAS CHANGED.
OF transfer YVES Inade ol foE1ou tae 1n!sfest
covered by the policy Of Insurance N The keishA
The question was whether the change In the u
teEest Of the property haired the r1sht OF Scanon
under the policy. This policy did not Al the other
one did, provide for the avoiding Of the lnst,u-
ment by The sale Or 5 1s1eF ,sn, o. 1,e me
The policy ~ It's te!7ns was rendered void ~ d
change IN The condition 0! me property, tnA tne
Iact Ihai parry who Is insured tsAnAels SONG
portion 81 MS interest," 10 tne plopSM! oues .S Aos
prevent tim ircm recoses.aE, n!Vs.aea 'nH,, ~
the time Of the loss he retained N ln1e!esL lneTe
fore, the fact that plainua made An Arrangement
With Arssra Keith thai they hEnt eesome CO
l.arnerK, would not pfefcpt pla1nun iluA tscos-
ertlg, providing he hAd an Interest Al inc uMe o.
me txtrnt of his interest, Jury out
la bankruptcy.
yr,e prs;,io,-Chartes d, Palmer and Robert G.
r,.,t, ny.sbTco ~ Invn,rnf,ry nruc.se.iIrr tnsu-
Slnke, Q! Shlcasn- 4ns etaata'' pso@ss0'e AA7s
tutcu hy Julfus Jonas et n ,,.
>A!,'G.oat,ons- !nlam y. nce- oi e"e-so'
Ensiilet tn Apply for DiseAaree-Simue1 and
William Dunlop; John Nhitthl, OF Aanteoot
hXnAakce County.
c,,.,t c.srt-
The court |, sill enrnrrd upon the tr.al Of the
luln,,cr case OF NasOt. Il "a. y Newell Hcaumout
ca, - W. "
trpGHM
Jonathan c. Bowics ', Frederick Hsumxu aud
Lewis G Ellsworth. Case, judgment on verdict
Alexander y. Fullerton y William ColdIc Eject
menL Judgment on verdict for defendant This
cause came frum the Cook County Court or Com
mon reas. BY chanTe Of rtnue: 1t WIS or1Sinal-