, 1869-05-22

+.
4 Ks cone to his tpforrrauon md belief mat inr
anl1apt has !nsetests leNal and eq11ssole IN real
essate, which he has not dlsc1osed IGe eaaTse,s
Addition has been covered up by sus;ee!ns It IL
tho use OF ba1kIurt'a VILE
Unifed ssaies District ceuY1.
W0AASsf RIGHTS or PROPERTY.
IN ine m11ter Of the opposition to the dtEhsrsr
9.Is sinces ouezson eaqae M eea IT, dee. 1em
the Womans' Properly bW Of tals stais. Ise
inpt had co7ered up prppersy Which shona % q 70
bis crrd,oIt b. placing It Ia the name ot hi4 NJ.
r. 9' :PS e5sdGE r W. The ea11pt bEo;h
n1ed a. creditor to . verr large amount The
properly Nas a bark, q The TWO Fannie4," and
house ana ns On Michigan arenae- 1t appears ia
testimony that q 500 Ut the bankrupt and the wife
tArs Edred} had .. o1e it.:.e furnished to her Is
gift, the sn1a Of sa~'', ~ the rurrhase Of house
in Detroit; h. hid ss well some yezzs before. r.
celved . loan ct I!ie sum fro:u ht1 father, 10
Tie Coan had u elect thus: The on,, prpper-
ty, or money, 80 tat - wc Know, WHICH M.s f.
drru obtained, independent Of her husband. py
which this property Was purchcsN1, ia what was
Obtained from aeI san; be also. howere1, endars-
ed the notes thai were given for the resseL
one OF the e1nbat1aBments Of the case arises
out ol the relation In which the party who Iaal,
the eersoa So Il { ese ne msde ia T.
and 10 the bankrupt, he being the scn Of 10th
the parties. Il the monsy had come from par-
of such 1 case would Be less. 1t Is, ttcret5re,
proper to consider what Nd appeared IN evil
denee, to-xtt: the advance made by tho ta,hcr
n Il soaor, o 'ssA' @ase tucs s .n N' ss7.ast. .
here r.. te s'fs savteg r. 70 1oE sost ot con,
then the mother would bc entitled TO the full baa-
ent GTnF1ug ont of such . circumstance, but
isiien ~caa I saTe II ta entered Mo se
For while The st&s1ro gives to married womhn
the rtahk independent Of her hushan4 70 control
der husnsn, It Is clear that ii never eonsenp
l1as u1a71t..t woman 2h1uld be u1ado use Of -
an Instrument By which the pecuntaV intescs: OF
e1siofE. s nS 50 % ia: while L jast .na fsai :sat
Hzatercr the vie ACQUIRES duitns eovettu1e rom
an seasse 'no9.d os M 1sP5 ses Sef
cot br seqresteted aIl excluded from his cEedtr-
as sift, pure and slnple. with which the moneJ
OF the fhkhcr had nothing 70 do, then the wife
AhouId 10 projected In II
and nsos~eut. be canaot make use Of hts wife, d.
rectiy or isdtrecty, tAcoverup, shy of ~ prop
de eets properly of hsr own, Independent Of him.
shc a to be prutectcd, but he c1nnot mate use Of
her as an instrument p Gaiher about her ~.
with BIN Er99, mA1 b4A no right 10 70 to his
wife and sag this y . 4cod baEzaln; make this
purchsss; give .our notes 1oE ta.s psopssH, hs!
Then escape thc responnionsy of tass transaction.
20 f.r Is be = debtor: r. thsre u nothing pro-
Skss' oS o, q@ ESe pa1ss n sHe n his s'asas.e
1 tion-lne resuls Of his skns aEkt his Judgment,
an4 hls creditorsare entitled to =! ant, he cannot,
hy such Transaction cuver up the interest which
hs may haF9 IN tsst Fsupely, which Is the fruit Of
ais akiu and a tnrnt from hts creditors II,
ca The other hs6d, there y. = consideration pro
rrspe.tr with which he is unoonnected, then she
aheald te protected IN the NoreEts
found not gnaiI under the sreatoeatious. TIE
Rss s;e;t a'sssa s'sasi Il s ssassi: '' ''
In HankxuptI>
Ft.i:los for Dse4nrot-Theotoxe I4chtenhet1u
| md Jzilus Ltchtenhein. Of cnsSEoi David s.
Assdieanaa-T s:scmess. q. Tnornas B.
Sopers, Of New Boston. Mercer County.
CARES n. wfocs, Of wilmington. VIM County:
John l. GuEzaA, u Chicago.
| Circuit Court.
t NlEan l. Harper ct Il p naTtd = Ely ct a.
Cnance5 proceeding on he3nn2- This case In
voIses the consideration OF ect'eefcnt rtShts uu-
der the Law Of nations. One. Bradley made =
| mortgage. In 1859, to DIS Hadaocf. to secure
bond tos 1890 and tnseIess COUPONS, s. u issi.
declared the bond due, In consequence Of dcfsult
made IN the payment Of N instal1nent Of Interest
,isiop On Giafk Ind GT1s1old streets, and bctwecc
| Polk and Harrison streets, Was eotat under power
bast e. e M la asca ssReem @ss
ns9pe tns dsaas aea
sss. ,ae es ,.e 8 D. D. .adoel & =
merely oolorable: that 1t was n real!ty to ths
morgagee, his sc2atavc. 1t = also. Claimed that
continuance Of armed rebellion, Bradley and Hsr-
ae1 of rseei Is s.sse The % ptupssf5 ras snssc.
qacntlJ conveyed o Ey- who i, therefore, istn
cipal defendant. the o6iec. = 70 set aside the
low redemption
Robert r Tkckars :. Uari1 Stanton. For $f3s. 81.
CHARLES u. Baker ct aL :. HllLanLB. Hibha1t ei
d naaTa ~ aade party to tudsnoa' Against eo
Mastin Q: Walter r UhHch RoTneea and Pst
of up partition % enclosing the once On ne rsail
noor ol the store Ne. II East Randolph atzeet, ant
The shelving, deska and drawera p4Ita!nlaS 70. o
the ceiling OF the otlcet or any part Of any cl It
1t wocld appear rom the statenent ct the coru
pla!asnt, that he lad leased the premises naret
Waiis n a1ful - occupancy deiendaats tals tt,
partition anu fixtures re1ef1ea to. under m agree
nent that he should make needed rrpa!H, teduc
made for their 1al7e n tho term of the lsase. Sub
teqeen.ly The premises rsrc d.naYea by 1st, -,
ias 1f nS",s he ,osss sA and aefces,4nts ca'1a ia
nevertheless. !. remove the n1tat:s, anesa the:
poi teE tnsa rn+ enu,ss complain
Joseph faInB~ roth :. Ell E. EoElntoc. EeFl
: Cash aad Jacob Wilder. AssunPsil Dau:asrs
+ s-Seo,
: superior Cou.t.
n Patnes: Row!"f :. John aat1.ch Tn:a> = .
ea;s sesn sustained y ne aT q 81 ss
/, premises On C1lnnn ant Harrison. .2trrct1 Or II
= part Of palnUr. Il wss claimed thai the eccG1