New-York tribune., 1869-03-01

fgi 10
preached and congratulated him In itiehJ J,i cf iha
Mr. MAVNAR RID suggested that as the aeuon Oi ulo @
os in te case OF Mann agt Jones showed that there
vacancy in the district a9 al @ held tbe Ger.
ticatc and had therefore, pta ao @ dng ~ the
he be sworn in and allowed 20 hou a % % oeT motion
litigation He aked unanimous consent 10 oner o''OD
70 T Ps0S declined 10 yield the floor for that purpose
Mr. CHANLER dem, N W appealed 10 Mr. oPSon "
let Mr. Maynard make that motion. -, 49,. q, h, d,d
MI UPsON declined to do so, adding thaS II no , GIS
the gentleman from New-York wond be fonnd Young
Mr. CHANIFR perslsting in his effort TO have the
motion made the SPEAKER remarked that the gehtHle
man from Michigan was entitled to the oor ana must DO
RMITo0 0CHANIFR intimated that gentlemen on the Re
publican side were always protected by the speaker
The sPFAKER said the gentleman from New York
was not jus he had had his own rights protected ny
''iy Mr. CHHNIFR replied that he had appealed to the
Speaker when questions OF vcraety were passed
members, and that the Republican members hsd Deon
protected and the Democratic members had oeeh pun
The sPEAKER-The remarks Of the gentleman from
NewYork ere respectful to the Chair nor are they
Mr.. CHANLER-very well, Sir. will leave that ques-
tiOn to be decided by the second.
Mr. UPsoN then went on 20 argue IN suppIr po U Sat t
neither Of the claimants for the seat w MenaT1 or
toned by Messrs Schenck Garfield and Pano 70 snow &
that Mr. Menard had the same pfna JGes rSa e T eS
seat holding the certificate OF the GOVERNOR tha o'ey
Mr.. UPsoN argued that they had got past the prima
MT MT GxRFIEiD dSep OhoJ inquired whether the
gentleman meant to say that this election case IN
WSS % gPsS Tas Suggested re dS that % perhaps the
not understand what prima faeis meant, and he gave
being which was good on Its face and baa ID is
Mr.. KERR Dem, Ind Of the minority Of the Commit
tee on Elections argued that Mr. HINT had an unques-
ton@6e right 70 the seat hSyPg fsseyea ss eson
Mr. PAINE ep., Wis., moved to amend the resolution
by provision admitting Mr. Menard TO his seat penang
thn cOns of
VI" After further discussion by Messrs BEoK PAINE and
GARFIELD the House proceeded TO vote on the various
propOstons The vote was first taken the resolution
OF the minority OF the Committee OF Eectohs declSns
Caleb s. Hunt duly elected and it was rejeeted-fe@S'
The s Vote was next taken on Mr. Panes amendment
amendment was reected-Yeas, 81; Nays, 1SO.
Mr. DAWES moved that the whole subject be laid on
the table. Agreed TO without division. .I
Mr. DAWES then offered resolution for the paymeh'
Of the two claimants simon Jones ana rr D. m Men"ru
Mr. KERR moved 20 amend the resolution by adding 10
| It the name OF Caleb 8. Hunt the other claimant
.- .' A PERSONAL EXPLANATION
Before having the vote taken Mr.. Dawes yielded the
HOOr to Mr. Chaner for personal explanation ~ FelsF
himself He proceeded 20 read extracts from me G9Oe
that he he eaa SaaS Sesn S Su6o s @ Of Se
tween members had decided In way in respect to re
ocrac members referring to tie cases Of Mr. Logan
Illinois and Mr. HObroOk of Idaho, was contradictory
| and unfOunded In parliamentary practices
The SPEAKER remarked that, instead Of being per
sonal explanation, the remarks Of the gentleman from
guage which the gentleman had used this morning had
fallen upon the Speakers ear as direct reflection upon
his yeraciy. He had understood him 70 say that on
questions q yera9ty be would appeal from the decision
Of the CHAIR and he had replied that the Language was
only response that gentleman could make 70 sueh
remark The Speaker then referred 20 the two cases
cited by Mr. Chaner--the cases OF Messrs. Logan and
HOlbrOOk-and showed that the remarks OF MI logan
had not been intended to be offensive ana had been n
medlately withdrawing while those OF Mr. iio6rook had
been grossly been had not been
| mol cal 80
toD but he would leave 1t fearessy to the political as
whether there was not the widest possible be
tween the two cases, which the gentleman from New
same day attacking the presiding officer Of the House
! Of which he was Il member 80 ,
| amendment. and they were agreed TO- .,
Mr. WARD asked to offer a resolution inktructng
the Committee on Public Buildings aud Grounds 20 In
qure into the statement that the relics OF George wash.
ingtOn, taken from the Arlington Manson were about 10
be restored TO Gen. Leo;
| Mr. BROOKS objected.
The House them at I9O took recess until 1880 o'clock
"'' EVENING SESSION.
| THE ALASKA INVESTIGATION.
The House resumed Its session al $780, the Speaker In
n Mr. HULBURD gep, N W, from the Committee on
Public Expenditure made report on tho subject OF the
the members Of The COMMITTEE %eR was ordered to be-
printed The report Is signed by Representatives HUI
tureiy this morning The following is appended t;
The undersigned members Of the Committee concur "h their fsov
sp1ss.Ds Their decided per
|
deeply interested and Keeping tbs s Of tbsr ba retaiss from
he edge Of those V6 wIom tbe broughtl cOua
Quoting tse 6u'n q their e.s orsy right q wrong may ss
fsl 40 iitora 70 Be eed H foLssn poss n such e.,e %.
desed hs morality q bis 1eas upon 'aeh retainer 'og'
Certainly @sn whose former high puddle position has gv, h
confidence Of BIZ foreign
ts tts4s 9Sps .sns 70 a 10 consider ss' Mr. m Pss u. . S %
sP T. sSs o n II s % a. s 70 S' m d ..r" e s
m sS.ap ss be sbG % 4 G . s As.. q . Fo. : @
been gul Of great Hopre' This all night bat The report las
word Of condemnation ir oss actually empo,d sd
pabc attention from position by directing WIr
B&ooSi1 s S' l. ccs1Rs sTsrars rAprA
Mr. BROOMALL iReP., Pa from ON the same Committee
Also from the Committee on Accounts reported on the
Mr. CLARK rep. Kaul Introduced resolution author.
iZug the Pacific Union Company, Eastern Division, TO
change IT'S to Kansas Pacific Railroad Company.
THE INDIAN APPROPRIATION BILL
Tho House then wentintO Committee OF the Whole Mr.
POmerOy In the chair on the Senate amendments to tho
Mr., BUTEER Rep, Mass), on behalf OF the Committee
| on Appropriations, proceeded TO explain the amend
ments Ho said that the bill, as 1t passed the House,
appropriated S2,912,24O estimates which had called
for t2977,9s2; the Senate Committee Appropriations
had added to II amendments amounting 70 t5IO96S and
| the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs had added
amendments amounting 70 g. 600 9as so that now the bin
FORE very important ono but It still mpOr-
tant in view Of the amounts that would be called for
by he Muse X the eas made By the ndn co
mission sanctioned by the House and appropriated
next year for the Indians about sl0OOOO the following
year and from sOOOOO 10 $4,000 900 after that for the
matter which called for very considerable care and
for the exercise OF Judgment Indeed, tho mat
ter important and difficult that the Com
mittee on Appropriations bad NOT been able TO
any conclusion satisfactory itse and had instructed
him 70 state the facts aud submit the Judgment
OF the House The Indian treaties mp 1865 10 1885, had
been substantially satisfied by about tOOoOOO but In
1867 Congress established Indian Peace Coinmlssion
That Commission had gone 10 the plains and treated with
the Wild roaming Indians which treaties caed for those