, 1869-05-17
aye lattty been made In The rules and BYLAW Of

,ave LATELY been made In The rules and bylaws Of
ttc tpsrs1. md thst since that Gate Murry Nelson
spoken cf fn Ists bii bat BY WY Of nnsHerthey
htAte that II the time the letters we're seut there
wa no proceeding pending before the hosri to
anthorsze any such action as the litter proposed.
Ths board vas tncapacitatcd troa giving enec. to
~ 1sael s | to discipline susp:nd Or e1
thelr part with any requirement touching the CON-
plaln' OF pr1cs'!y against them
nn ansf admit TIE rayen; hy q ,e ,se
a,rnS o. stand a; table tor the e1h't'tsioa q
samples sa1 ior the current year. a7d
s e a. easo e q tne
hnf 1t Il denied that this proceeding should e.
e1npt comrlatnanta from being controlled by tac
according 10 tie Iuiea, but cialn thl II II VI.
theft choice to have claimed thing lo this pro
cecdnK b, reason of their payment, shey ahood.
d.. sE IL m.,s soad sae asse e s's
that she proper order might haye been
question Of whether there Was falroc!4 OF c7utJ
IN holding the Injunction 70 prevent hnJtalnR
ee aons 1o ae5e Ese ri e3 On .
kon Of Ao order Of the Bo-rl Of utfcctofs " res
son Of acts necessarily and properly h1ppent1T
p.oi .::c:y G: that order.
NEW sr1Ts
Frark GenneshJ y. John seynpre Ttenrass.
SUIT hFuirEt for An alleged 9sAarft- made On the
1eth day Of May, 1863. nj the glue factory, with
utt :. Vi c:1ntIrg. iat ia is4deh in aid
Anthony .yos4v. KosAlIc Cross I'LL for d.
corcc.
Superior Court
.iaiaIas Net.rv v. Anthony A. T.. Roxcrs- As
sutnnsl. Spr-su!t take1.
ElGHEa OF w1rSE5sEe.
.a,I+Ett. 'rr:.eEtv. George F, lsussc' ct als.
r3sIu,ill takes a.nons;Ii- Tn'4 was All actnn to
S,7t.r0 NJ liz
defendant % commission iaen. The lelent:
"a. The ar' Topzsa'1on Of the proceeds hs direction
il tnA case, pen,llnR the triaI. new question
was ra:scd auu an opinion Iutinaiet by Judge
Cay. 4 witness being on the stand was asked W
Sa n The Snes. delayed aGs a. sssef 10
tiv Cour1 70 sustain HIN hy enforcing = Tns
Gso fsDe reaste hat sse se'8 etDess Ii DID ~ss ees
bound IN answer the question, u having been
answered 10 IN presence Of the Court: }ury and
lfanr-rs II lie response. The Court s:stc:l that
though this wss very usual practice In the exam.
'1aion n1 witnesses lie had long hee1 convinced
lIst time Ills ac;ion had been asked, and now he
enould declare the practice wrpng.
Pau, ror, ell e. a. Cornell L Norton, v. ~ @.
Fretlenek Lang :. Alexander J. Elder ant Geo,
i,en,an,n ilndaner Ct aa :. Thomas and VIII
'!au kes7. For ts:':iA
| Margaret rlcSley '. Jeremiah r1ektcy, Proceed
| ing Tor divorce dismissed.
| one TART OF 4 EELoS YATE.
Annie Ira It =. John I,r1dt- Dccrcc of divorce.
The p1rt:es 70 this procec ding wer: m.ried ln
This city, on the loth day Of Novcmtcs, lsts an1
lived together, in tho mIEita! relation. uutu New
Years bay o! isit, 1css than Two mootnS aossa9
| which time the complainant ztated that she had
hef csuse .; complaint soe alleged th.t her haa,
on NJ he snp ,sy ql q, Iea1 sfn Is
tic state Of >;cw York. In support Of her aCct-
sat.on she r-o,laeed the record Of the conViction
TeIsaine1 n | C: Montgomery County. ScT Ierk, dur
inE TIE Nay terra Of 1e6d. he wns presentel ~
| ieiou as i resident Of the town 0; Amsterdam
states III treasury notes caci oi The salne or
flu, from one Hiram SlmmonA The record also
shows THAI .:e subsequently pleaded Ills ellt and
WEE sent 10 lie State Prison at Deuamaza Tor Two
| jc.4zs- ..
Edward Srhnttr.nl1reler =. August Schwartz Bin
| 10 cauce c1ntrnct The complainant states thai
Oh the IL day OF February he executed and de-
!tvercd sealed Instrument to defendant con-
as.!nS iog r. lle q @nt lot 10 q LSIs ss1d
tGfly feet llleston Rvtnne>. for s3sal and r.
cttvtd S. as hrst payment. the pay men. ~ the
PCT cent lntcrest aud litle 10 he lurn,shrd v.Liu
once procured and detec.s tonna i
| TIlS tUaiu. TIT ~ A1uHA W. &uN IL
more al! bn. c1ou which WAS the title, by TIT
conrtesy OF ono William GraJ, ~ father Of mtnorl
aot!.nt in fee. He states that he has been unshls
to ot:ain decd Of this Interest," wheFe he h1l Of
/ fcrc't to EGtand the money received which HI,
rc!t,ssai. wacrtlore. to relieve himself from for
ther ,t:stI.s, he applies 10 have the contract re
| sCtndcd on payment
! KIrclhnn r!rulhess y. Alexander Mcdonald AM
Francis Wl1klns. AssumpAit Damages S2"h.
| Recorders court.
| Charles Ncf,a.i lad George Messner. I.1Frfn
II. hooks ya!oet3 a, 81. Sentenced each to one da1
In the County jail on their plea Of guilty.
| NEW ECITf.
| samuel 4 To!man ct ais. Z. Thomas OCo1nol
Ass1nsrc1t nauagcs f:oo with rnnids IN aid II
this there is IN alleged indebtedness to plain
tins at ts7hn1 fo- gtaots sold to defendant Will
| he was tho owner Of 4 drug store Fond du Lac
! is charged that he procured the goods upon tals
representations Us to his business, It being alcfc
that he has frandultntly disposed Of hts rropert
| 10 defrAua his c1cdnoEA