Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-03-25
THE COURIs,

MUNICIPAL COURT-GeO. ". WdIdTdn
NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. calendar was en-
tireiy disposed OF ia this Court. Tit
cases set for to-day are az follows:
1892 NJ. & A. Of Memphis vs Morrison
l4l9 Mageveny VS. County OF Shelby.
1902 Winters vs. County Of Shabby.
1874 Pike ct al VS. Evans.
17y3 Bingham vs Carlton.
1871 Selden vs Jones BrOs.
1903 Black, Cameron & Co. vs. Patterson
& Bro.
1904 Smith & Co. VS. CartwelI & Drury.
1905 Morte vs. Henry.
1903 Ramsey VS. Rogers.
1907 Van Brocklin vs. Ramsey ct al.
lS0S Bond VS. Hanley.
1903 Waltz vs. anne.
1910 Erich VS. sane
1871 Fox rs Mason.
1872 Same vs. same.
1913 King, use, etc, VS. Merrinaan, admir-
1914 Mansfield & Co. VS. VIM.
1915 Riley vs. Robertson q Dickinson
ex'r.
1917 WHISKY VS. Cockrell.
1918 rhorp VS. N. Y. Fire Insurance Co,
1919 Gibson eli al VS. Elliott.
1921 Chandler o. Co vs. Psrtee.
1892 Taylor vs. 5ayIDgsRank of Memphis.
1923 MarrinOni VS. Vacearro ct al.
1924 BsDji vs. Wildberger.
1925 NJ JASON VS. Bushe.
1926 Vance VS. HUM & Co.
1927 Ward & Co va WATSON & Co.
1928 Green VS. Power & McGeoy.
1929 Nichols vs Grant.
1880 Phillips & Co VS. Cockrell
CRIMINAL COURT. - Vim. Hunter,
T4dge.-SOms seventeen or eighteen
cases of minor Importance we're stricken
from the docket in this Court yesterday,
the parties never having been arrested.
The trial of the case OF the State vs.
Clark, indicted for larceny, was con-
Guided and submitted to the jury, who
returned a verdict of guilty" fixing
the punishment of the prisoner at two
years in the penitentiary.
To-day the attention of the Court will
be devoted to the hearing Of writs oil
hsbeas corpus o pending before the
Court.
CRANCERX COURT Wp9. II. Smith,
G0nceuOT.-This Court Was occupied the
whole day yesterday ia hearing the case
of Mcmillan VS.. Carlisle. Pending the
trial Court adjourned until this morning,
when the above case, together with
those OF Hodges VS.. Bank of Memphis,
aud Watkins vs.. Specht, ct al, will be
called.
DEGREES fled yesterday:
Williams va Brown, on report.
LAnier vs. Gayos0, anne
Planters Bank VS. Merrill, final.
Bank West Tenn, vs. MARI, reference.
Walker vs. Nelson, same,
LAW CoURT-H. s.. Lee, Judqe.-In
this Court the case of Arnold We,
Trigg was concluded yesterday, and
q verdict rendered ins favor OF
plaintiff for $500. In the case
Of McCullum, administrator, VS.. Stew.
art & Bro, a non suit vas entered. The
next case called was that Of G0Odhua
VS.. Schoonover, Administrative. This is
an action instituted by plaintiff to re.
cover on the endorsement Of a prOpis-
sorry no te, alleged to have been executed
by the def endant's intestate during bis
lie time. The case continued up tC
three O'Clock, when it was laid oveI
until this morning.
At the abeve hour the hebeas corpus
case of John Canovan, committed foI
/" criminal contempt of Court" by Judge
Smith, of the Chancery Court, q few
days ago., for the alleged dis0bedience
Of an Injunction awarded and issued in
the case OF Keep ct al We. Csnovan et
al, now pending in the Chancery
Court of Memphis, amt up for hearing,
but the parties not being ready, the
matter was postponed till Saturday
morning.
The ha5eRs corpus case Of A. G. Long,
arrested and held upon . charge OF for