, 1869-05-13

1
Tit wound ia not dangerous
TIE COURTS Of lAw AND EQUITY.
! tnit~d stale. Circutt Coust.
George Peabody =, George n. Taylor. Eject
nI4s nI1, ~ me soatheas- quare! o. Seeuon Is \
| NEW FIT.
5hninas Henry. survivor. etc., :. James 7. anu
| xAADA1rA
Ne, Z SchoslioEb V. Hcnrs 4. Kohn and simon
| fothstntid. Petition for Mdadana. 10 cause the
REMOVAL. anCer tue act Oi Congress down to 15S.
q nI"cee-ling III chAncrrJ :" tile Jurisdiction u
this CotEt- TEe controversy y concerning a piece
eaeq ,v y kNan q .1p.a. sao !, Is reasss sss
at:'laE; t1 prejudice, and rendered bond to
Judge Jameson. of the Superior Court aaklux An
MAKE me transfer, IN Eatt upon questions not
! raised l,y counsel, but IN view OF what he con-
cesed to he The "lusy Of 4 Stale Court Itself. to
watch 1he rather 100 prev a1eut disposition Of tic
Federal Courte 10 usugp jurisdiction and ia PVT
'sccause he 1ho1ght the law did moi reach the case
where The co-dcfendant wzs resident Of 1ll1nois.
Cnltcs. STATE. District court
! County, ,,ank1ur1 involuntary proceeding b. Z
s Ja1E;J i 10 The question Of dental nf han T.
rurtty 1as izied and The following verdict rem
w H. ;nig X i5s sns h., f9s., fy e -. d
TITS ef s rers dn Fl h:
n't,r:s. I'd :. use1 ii Ill e.ulncIrai rsper fof
;oss'G I'd ,G,t5, sS a''t to ~; on t~" aote' Tor
~-'S7' = -''S VIVA NV AID ENTERTAINING.
An 0t"rett!rE acd novel question was presented
| to Judge tlHsu.npnd yesterday. The matter OF
The olI-.|i"n 10 the discharge OF Julios Her1in-
rese q ,tso sosn.9E % o. for srs in e1es
| the ia: t.urt and Of his brother Charles
telore = c.tce,er. upon suggestion of 1ane, and
After d., PORTIONS taken they h.d no, naid the
Tees. Whrrtlele the Hea1+tcr. Lincoln Ciark, Esq,
lad dec!!Iel TO seaa the dispositions forward.
t,tEnen. taken IN an action Of trespa 81 for son.-
Where abplt two hundred tloliarS There WIS one
9;her ese'';;o5 NJ shirley, fos sl9o awyers fees.
Withdrew f7t5:n the tcl1- An attorney named
NEainestl represented the opposing credltorA
fore -ae 1,.'rmen: hec,me lien, ba, af,cr It vas
rendered against the bankrupt, he had, with iu-
ten. 70 et7aH' his creditors, fraud licaty trans
''rrsd to i..s brother title to real estate.
The Cor: made an uster that III. depoxltions
he produced n court, when Nj. Clark, the Regis
tEr; came lie SAFE, that he had the deposit.ons
Ia hh band. AID that he wished merely to say that
they haa .os teen nali for, and he 1cl. coandcut
they wan Los te pail for unless he were allowed
se io a. sel q he coa ~ ae me nlsse =
oEt he desired The Coart to consider whether he.
A. lsegas'e:. was bound 10 take deroeltions. as
time Aid laor, INIT wifhuut securttr for the re-
sonpeuse a!sose41 hy law.
7ie Co +: tt. ugaI the Register need not taEe
snr lcpo.::ons, nEcss be wAs psid tur them but,
In this case. the dispositions were take1 ~ Register
-as al or.tcs q! the Court OF course, Il applies
co>tB, as = nnditton on which tbs case ahouli
proceed. sic Court would hare reluIred II to tc
given. an'I an ozt1cr had Just been male IN TINT
regard
The court tn4n!ze.l whethe. the opposing cred
tiers Tere Irresponsible.
Nj Bra.ntrd, their attorney, stated that he be-
ileved they were, treyond doubt Al the r!mc the
Judgment vas obtained they kept boarding
aouse, but they had broken that up and gone he
The Court iutlulrcl rs to the e1pen ,e OF the de-
position:
Mr.. tla,: stated that Il amounted to about s24
lie sIad nle an effort To collect the Til lrom the
Attorneys tut had been unsuccessful
The Court looked upon this as a matter OF dis
srttion, rEd he had some donhss whether 1t va.
quite ln!.er to exercise 1t In behalf Of these op-
ponepss Of Tie deeharge-
Nj. B:a!nttd ,hoaEht the proceeding would AZ
th.aln thtiT pay.
Mt. Glars suggested, as question for the con-
s!1e1ation ri the contr, whether II was prntes !on
deposition, wien they hare reason 10 belere the
party canno: ray for the work
~as unlro:cssionsL Ia sii thcse e.ssss i the
Register dubbed the responsibility OF the partteA
be thought be coul1 require deposit Of uo1cy,
on. lie thought that no attorney snouli nsk a de-
position TO he taken when he had reasan to believe
payment w01ia not be made,
The cause wns then tried. the dispositions being
sliowed to te read, and vctilct Of not guilty re-
turned.
ORDER.
Hereafter. II ~ cases IN bankruptcy, tefoFe ex-
ceptans OF specifications In opposition to the dis
Charge Of any bankrupt shst, be lei the creditor
CT e5her raTy contestlnE the discharge, shalt die
Lonu OF stipulation for COSTS
In Bankruptcy.
Norris, Of nsxou. fee conaty. AS'-A'''o' a.
A.ijMt:ieutS',-Nenr W. Hyle. Of Chicago;
John l. Card, Of Cnicago; Frank +. Terry, Of chi.
c4gu ,lnvu.ultnry,.
t1rcul. Cour,
TIE tE:at OF Arthur Dcsiue, for murder, rs slut
In pspgrtsA. II Is expected that The hearing Of
erllehce vii! te concluded by this da. II noon
sTtEET IMPROVEMENT.
Martin Eattetshal ct mis-. '. s. B. Mccormick
Decree maHag perpetual The Injunction restrain
Ing defendants from closing or obstructtne an a.
ley described - commencing at point on the
south tine Of Madison street. l3i4 fcet east trpu1
the M northwest corner Of Blocks, Canal Trustees
ton u. ~, II: thence south lxl feet t1st 90 feet
PARALLEL with the south line OF Madison street;
thence north. parallel With the east line OF Throop
street 1ea Ieet, to Madison street; thence we.t.
Along The south line Of 3allson street 96 ftet, to
rornE qr7cs-N.gcu.
answered, and decree Of divorce on the ground
alleged, OF cr1ciy. In this case ILL 10: divorce
" f r9rs11s M n1 sSest cslesk
terminating tho case by decree. TIE parties 10
this eallopas consumption Of matrimonial! oat,Gl-
tis,as a'l. '!Itata !" ie Ma !itu u. aaItsSNe WIS
sts,an, VI . -, h.h -. ~ -. y. ~ .s,s - IN.
o. ~ y t,na, =. .s ~ ~. ;, ~ un Enia aasn ~
~, ,f The.. s se - uS .n ~ rae II
th suu.' & tus'e ~ g, 'rSesnss -. 'or aoo1t
s,slnS In :as r!9cselhIns .. !ae saa,s .: ,ae
crseitJ. size alleged In her bill that he had. on
xtf fenre fnwant her. hnt hx R,v ~
spcc,Ica,t u. II was onlv s,at. tha1 ca oae ocrs
son, he .lreN her nsus backward aah :eld her LII
s;'s. res!s.,n MSa. susssst:, :. th.t sh;rs were
saows ,ss 1hc cF nrtp, sra a;ns He M .s
The defendant y his answer sdmi1sd :ns: he hi
| J.nes e,cb ;, Jnrnaa S;,;n.ht, ,o,, c,,,,,.
| lam ind d. {. 1enry. Trrx,nss msm.ya. is.t
Emcrso, u scot, as,be, mn, 1,.-,r
| 1.,rrrn As.nrnnstt p.r,s@c. a. sr - s1"' L.
@'"-4ahs'' sH''"
s,nrrior 1,,ur,
~, ,ote ILL., A3!e lhtassnee toaran! '. VII
10 ~ ~, . sa .o,, sses. ue.enuant nnt 9Nht!.
,n ,n.s ..., essv ~ ~ enasSen "1A naSns.
mlsapnIsaed % iunls receiye a. - rem,,,an Sa''
!,1a 1nllsl,an sehsen y scnooner Norway. CASE ~
A seot ~ - Tso,er iot PERSONA! inlhl1e5 ttne nfcak-
hsT,. " an VI a'1 ~ 1qH r. 'a ~ o. hs ara 70
saS teIuSt o oelt a1ant guilty. AMI damages
In his esse lie atgcnd,n, ..t.,, The f,oc-, ~
instruct the fury tnat no rase wss mad. a.; The
Court rcIusx.; to do sn WA A'-"e 'A' i"9
follows: That II thr bnsness ~ ~. oehnaHs,
kuch that ehc ttsnaijy and srfna,,s na11oetni son
river Of tie S1atc Of Iuinots fhouch tr n,tncin.i
part OF Tho VOYAGES were performed tu other
eating the rivers within or .nriernr m ti,e S,t-
| OF Illinois: and 10. Il the !njnr. vas caused by
nee1lrcne or = 1ack Of oninarr and rr1ann,hs
care and diligence Of the owners .Ncrc ~ III ha
-, fnr, II th- r,ssr..S ..N.I NV-.r