, 1869-03-31
COURTS Or LAW AID Equity.
Emitted Etufcs Circuit Court,

In the case Of John scanlon v the Union Fire
Insurance Company, OF Baltimore. M Interesting
solved by Judge Drunmuud. IN the Circuit Court
Of the United St2tcA Scanlou, being The I,rups.e-
~ q eens 1s ,na % onae
III TWO eo1npaDlea. the defendant III this cauFs
and the Untcd States Fire and Marine Insurance
present case covered $3.50 On the building, s. y On
the naEhineIy end nxtarea, and 500 on the Btock.
The place Wus destroyed On the 1lth Of May, 1scs,
10 baVE been caused by tic .ollIna over Of kettle
o1 coal tar, tho tar running down into the nre
ioltnws:
THIS Is an action hy the r,alnilN against the de-
lendant, on policy Of Insurance, dated II Sep
te1nner lsSs b Thca tas defendant ssses to L.
ture Of Iponng felt the sum Of, &c, amounting 70
T. 80, and the insurance Wa upon this property,
nrst question that arises Is, to the interest Of
the rlalnttG In the properly injured. At the time
that the place wss insured there u no controversy,
tor Of he property on which he policy ms Issued,
but 1t is claimed that AFTER the policy WAS issued,
there was change; thai, by an arrangement OF
t'te the Mcazieu.s Keith, on the llth day Of Jan-
AIRY. is6s, copArtncrshfn WIS formed ny which
these tso parties were takvu in anl tne interest
wAe changed, or : tf1nNcr Nas Yuate Of portion
Of the Interest covered ty tho policy OF insurance
The lrst question Is as to the eect Of this act Of
"a there d no rontroyergy n "a the farts of the
case, It realy becomes a question Of law.
Que Of the conditions Contained In the bosly Of
the policy Il that III the said property (of cot,rse
the property toyereI b. 1he Insurance. ashali be
Sthos ,ae csusens q, The ,s poun1 a1 o1 IN
writing hereon, tnen, and In every SUCH case, this
FOLEY sha1l be null and vold-''
the meaning o{ this clause IN The pufcf. sale or
conveyance Of the property, in sach way as to
render s. !, +, 70 so't ,,..-., ,,,, ~. . .s,,
condition ia general "that Il the said properly
shall be sold or conveyed" DC, It Ia not, that II
the prpIerIJ or nNy part Of IL or any nu1tr1lc In
tercat q ii thaI be sold OF Conveyed, that the
policy ahnll be void; It Is not that 4 there IL any
change iu tho condition OF the property,
y In the interest Of the p.ainuu, that
the policy shall be Told; bat
simply, that II the property bc sold or conveyed
,h lns ane91on - FnetheT ene tue coassfncuon Of
that the whole Of the interest OF the insured In the
HhtuiF3E Hh,is saaa " soio os oaoEeyeA. and, eNeA
a .n.nA - Ae uue con1t4uc11on o. me conohNn;
WSale Of lis interest Ia she pf9nsy n and m 81 !aa ss
ill,i,1 n nua ~ W s1e p5opes5 lne po!ct Is
e1sta sat enmPetens !os Tue S Insurers 70 as,
wa d Ral!sy ~ ~ se@psseas a isF see ,he
ehnnrr n fhe nonaitnn a. tIni III. u, 4s y - any
snt sMa1 te.s M POLICY no, would ~. b cort,an .e
ss.r \. ,,,S a.upg =! se tce sa1d property
th ren 81 f ano 90 nos as tnst
within the mesn,nr of fhss sz1nd,t,on az es - ~
germ oSr sae poney soao IneEetore think nc policy
ror - n.a., ~, te.sss s .nsis "as OF scanlons
tS, ne eoisrea ne the s'tsces Of eopaznc7ahip
The - anesttnn me- le tn.,. ~ Nc ), ~ ,, ,,,o.
TN fo1 so9 70 determine what tha: interest wnA
y. ~ eoutse. ~neTs 1 maa owns Piece 81 property
that ts worth q eoo. and has policy Of Insurance
upon II aad then tes ont portion Of the interest
~ ~ = q Go9lse ne poney onsy eoSen ens amount
q tne Intcsest tnM iemalna - acre, II bis Inter
dna ni 'S nn9 ~ c4c me e y as na9 a, h5asad
@ a. ~ ,aastsst ma aMouni 70 $1,000 then think
'T91 ~ ~ sslasi!,Is .n.S!ISt = ta psuts1GA
~, rs .eMak u n.uon O. tae e1ffSe was a. to
1'tn h ,.x
ns. lea. =. ~ tus !ne nlNnsla lnd assessed bis
,n,ar..t a. s'e"' me amount Of The policy and
l{,r,,ord : tso Soy Hns.s. ~ aukS1.
win B. Ia,sh ssprt n escopnq f3y g. e.
.eSeu shs " ee 1ue lEom ae!eno4nt as ~ agent OF
.ue Cuu!a01. Ans eiAM OF Inc Ql21utl0 i male
up o. lteMs OF coaectio1 on behaH OF the CON-
fahy, Win considerable amount alleged 70 have
49, ~ etsulteu ~ ue!GuoAut upou wrongful claim
ncss OF the COMPANY to defcnlans as acrnt IN
trial
pES1EIRY.
1ntunctibos were granted tn dve cases acn,nst
dentists Of this CITY 70 restrain them In the use of
dental puyposeA Tbcsc Were cases al The t3ooi
Dental Sulcanlta Company, and othert arilnst
William IL Farrhsa1. Betrstre j. Eefn,p - ~
tkcloSK 4 Bcech, AbrAn s. Rebcr, Geo1re nj
Cushing, and IIcrman =. Hale. The injunction
any ha5ys TntsFT Inr strn1si n,r1,,2ss ~ IN Sn
tsirTs o1 frnm using ,nT ns- ,bhsT \. ~ t.sl,i ne
In dclNatfy. for dental nfIOAc.S fhA II.