, 1869-04-21
Circuit Court. ..-.
Josent J. GasSeF '. Gustav II. Won Schlleben.
rRcspas5 for an alleged assault. Still Oh trial.
JUDGMENT.
John D. Tobey r. Patrick +. McMah0n; by agree
ment. for g., Ok

ment, for 51,o;a
In the matter Of the EingsbuJ estate, John
bonds In the penal aum Of a1Go o0o.
the eefs 81 tie M taets concerning @ tie condition q
this estate puSssse.:. few days slnce IN relatton
10 the management Of the estate BY David J.
lanad pase nsSa bee adds tna ushsf snslt iha
by an answer, Mr. Lake denied these averments
md no polns was male In the case that there had
been any acknowledgement
THE FECK WIDOWS
On the thirl day Of March last bul Was fie1 On
the ctaucefy side Of this court, which NOS ID its
details somew hat sensaiohal. Ascoau!a9 - ~
dcspotled Of her rights by the neither ol ncE ue-
ceased husband, and In it there were not onl!
% ~ ta out
the most fell purpose, resulting IN aeatn. 1nele
were also rccitoss Of ~ treatment, accusations
Than tc should have been, and even. Of herself,
the complainant had to- htase, that she hsd los
years leen living In unblessed relations, 70 me
birth o! several children, who had both father anu
mother and yet were illeEitimate-
The bin sas tled By one Margaret PecE me
respondent was Mrs Clartssa rex: me mes. CON. IL
The widow and heiE-at Of George E Pec6, Win
whom she had heen living for yeaIs, Rs she Sail,
bearing the relationship Of VIE, LUZ WKhoat me
sanctton Of matTsmony, until At day s, THs Isw
! months prior to his death lie married ncr. !Ae
ciaiIn extended to al interes; ln lour estates.
First In large estate lelt ~ no
one after the other died, but al before her hus-
| band.
the narration contained IN II somewhat changes
The asnect Of Affairs concerning the estate IN In
! heritance which complainant claims Ae last Il
nestSpe So ses iee iaf. t. H. cassa Pee closely
following the orler Of the original laill aan1s
| that Phianitr Peck, her husband, te', on,r anons
Siderable M rail m rioperts, AMI wife aIi three eh!ren
surviving him. his heirs at law Ihtse Gai!aiSl ma,;
Menrg r. teos Il ep s4a cne heila M
IN tEs County court, 49,, the o.nae defendant nlaq1
her ,bsp sa1s ,s,e husbands e Estate i also ID
| rlit.ed THAT respondent was Ainointen 10 almluis
# g rs s. 5s5 81 II: s. tas
a:d that the child Francis n Pecx MeI - ~ aisaG5 1
a,ir..tn!stration was saAsn out on ths
81 RE he es sd tato eSs haas
well ~ that after the death Of Phauder FeeE N
before administration letters were granted a. a.
estate, Il Is also admitted that no guardian va
| appointed for the children, hut MIS- Peck 81
that she caye them sash naf1n5e ,1haS en- se sai
that she assumed to be The guardian OF tne15 pup
| ertv. ,u,,,,.,-,.r1r nh,
Defendant admits tn2E, ~ NIL Htu1'u ~ fnIr ~ AL
which is correctly set forth "a the ns ai pcs Sa
had made the agreement win Geo:Se T. " -
zon' ts ~ u,t n tic term Of MS ussuri life, Il
,at,; h,m be assigned all Ill. property, real, pei
.csa and ard in the 'eSssi's sfpo1t % g usi Il
sr are Gained to be III ail respects tue snl cor
nicte, and concerning u h.ta George E Pecs n
i ror,ce Il! :he time and Place Nhen u Wolff Q
| rasset! on hy the Coutt,and appeared and assente
i 10 II When the report waS approved % I'M.
! settlement Of the estate Of ChNander Peel
ne e1s nss rs Up = +
estate OF rh.ianut1 Peck-
The defendant, hone,er, further ayers anotht
reci lad oeeome a. en- entitled IS from is ta1hers
tate. She recite5 deed hT George = teck. ~
aon, Of Aprtl 1853, converting to her N re aost
Is Addition, IS CONVEYANCE, executed June :
1861 Of bis intescs. In the southeast GuaftPea e.
Section II, 80, 13, 3, to herself and Henry L. Fec'
On % he XII & v day o4 June, 1868, the sgreemen
which conplane4of in ne e!n Whs eGeeatE g y;
bJ George E Peck, 3 whien ae "a eascts. IN
ali inheritance ron h,s father and sister: me me
dead This agreement u PcseIn c1sInins n nj nnSer Rm
the defendant having compiled With ne y, epI n1r
ions Of the agreement By tne psymnsaaIn and y ever
according lhs ter~s rs q a,ats s tas he receive
The money unIer the provisions q me ss ioa
and npproye.i Of tue validity Of The aeeu n aa ,on
as he liked, aud she sets them up "s ILL eatopps
n 7H;s against the complainant 49,, ..,,,,z
" y T. denied that the convcya1ces an4 t9e asstL
ment to rslsIeSe ha nas aesae esn Tad 81 Ee5
lE9 .,nress ar undue Influences, Or that thz
o1nt, nuv, man Vas Ignorant az to the value OF
esssis She shs s.ve .elufsantly a.
~ seEerai Years before his death; that he fri
oncntiy indnlged IN intoxicating drinks 80 "a to
,nrspable Of exercising an Intelligent judgment
these reasons, nDtt to manage bis own proper
or business; that Rhe made many earnest enorts
| reform him, and for yeatB devoted herself to Ill
so as to restrain him from wicked associations a.
habits; and that when her son Eas sober, he oftt
| expressed anxiety lest he should waste or hose
his property, and feared that he would be impose
| upon tn his incapable moments, snse, innnenct
| IL shaan anani,iarasfonn ar ha hY the mQu5