, 1869-12-09

rRcI:iok is THE CASE OF THE BARK MARY NEsR1Tr.
Aitcr de.at o. ee'elul ln9htas !nase 4. &.
Dki1e: Of wlsconsin, on The opening q The court.
tck,ctiat. aurounced his decision IN the case Of
g. My Ns 1sn! Ia
adopted Rl:-llsr IeEcIAtsoas tn thOse established
ly uu1 government IL tue set OF AAISh l. SIS, re-
istirs 10 The lz:pertatsoa Ct goods. We nave al-
vtalV cf. Gu r,cI sfory o: :nc rase of rhe May
Mer1At, aod explained the pruceedlass insnsuteI
sEArs: nI oJ our customs sataontl9 na ~
otx.ilcnre 10 tus1t actions from The Treasury Dc
sattErL:: bel In pt1cf to eoabe our readen 70
iuse tt rnte luly the ustneAs Of the decision, We VIII
aEa,n rise u sr1e' tynopsts 81 fpe p!oceedlngS:
Iu- ha,A arrived at this port 10 1uEe last VITA
1,na n" :, oTs,s Of tao tus'orn 1!o1se a. 1ot.
e;e:. ..t.s ,essv,, .so,e'y pwned W Citizens aod
setcrpg the privileges Of our c0ssr.pC trade: 0nF
toec.p1 reported Tie C.T,.rEntsrces to the Treas
st;,. H.: tiie ves. Il md cargo anaeT Section j
or ,t- SC: 81 March !, lsis. Hn:ca provides that:
''ln Eon,s MaEes or ncrA naoo,ss sial b. imported
faro ltr E'lten sta.e*, fram Any foreign
posi l.. sase-, except III seIels OF tne
iu"ed >tare.. uf u krcn 1ere'Sa vessels a trajv
a.h wl.Er bctoce to citizens Vt subjects OF thai
ttuct,uIs or rcabutaesutc. Ut IRON which Eoad+
van t,t.r tE CT n.,.: H.uhN5 ale rrst shipped tor
rtrri ..n s:tsi 1ns cx1'rd 10 vessels q, any Tor.
c:gr ia :pu which h.s not r'lopitd. g WHICH haall
:,sH at,p', at.c4slaF srkula.1on-" Iaus t1e MAY
N,f1 y ae htlzst, A,u he fosfG!tcre 70 The United
states rlarner, bc.u,a rhe lol,nEted roods VITA,
All i+.,:.t a resi- The Catea Sia;ts In the mean
!:;G OF fIe uct l1rtcA, hastuV rclo'r tssen feG1s
1rrttt It,- Ell oiled as Auch, nnA teAcE. she va!
Eth yt.r. III vessel truly uni Hhni'y ttl,1ttnJ +
-tt,e,4. =. III n7ra,,iau y C1Hi!1. CT the cnatr<
k.retu:E oI trtnt Britain. ffutn whence IN
f,g,lrrc Vas imported. Captain MlTEAT, n cam
uacd OF The bsIk Al The time 0f her seazHfe
Enough Mrsprs. Emmont van Dyke, 1pPcaset
~ clAtrant. nnc, xtthout alleging Any Facts ~ I
his F.gtt and luStreat In aod to the vessel, hlea =
cxtvts,,up 10 lhe llbC1 ard mo1es It's dismissal 10
nc re7soc thst the lbel flied 70 A.eEe LEA
Carsda or Greal Britain nao taaor;ed sl1lla
IN u court, tic United S:a:es ee:nE ferreseuIe
~ Inc Dittftct A1soEa.y. as'Inte1 by Mcssr
F:rcncs. Lylce Ntc1; the c.a't2ans ny Ms. En-
meas ct E.c rrIn nt1re caGed. III TIC course {
Ibc ufEnmrn,s, which were abtc on 10Th tide
The lNsyr:ci Attorney EoaintalEea thai u
libel ueed rtt a!eGe tha1 CanaaA and Gre
NIIiatn had at pied "riEi!ar regulations
Ter the 1eason thai tho Mary MesH;t Tns not Aot
le4I r. iuEelAD Vessel oS Eed ~ cli1eAs OF tAc
"a or ell.ec'h o! Great Britain. but os An vaior
,nf4.tt4 m ric,n reAsti, VIZ, trsstl hnt IN -
a,ls xlG owed cxcl1stseE bs citizens of
Crl:c.3 S.aleB; while the Hon. VIZ. !. LJn
en,wrt ~ upnp.ttiobatle legal kothOs1.lea, III
Vie I'uit,tI Slater In thtA cz.e wa1 entitled II
hes-ec @! forfeiture, the allegation OF INC II
hsv;tr iusu vutC9llx admitted hy ihe ea1tnant
his cXcrnt 'nu. However, the learned JsoEe
cur lsrstrict Court hal d:2I{dHrd me Nocl
s:cye ttt'ct. X Il to BE- se1re.t4i t1At tois
riticn IL Tot accompanied By Tt,tteo op'n!
exp0undl1g the law aud ren~3u " Wnlcn u
guvef.esl. HUT the case Is dtckied. 1nd wh
:+cr Y, - ftgtt" We eEuppoac--Attr1h1e ee
,.f', lHe. 3.