Perrysburg journal. (Perrysburg, Wood Co., O. [Ohio]) 186?-1965, 1869-05-14

/ lFnBYs0rRG, May =, is6P.
J Enron JourNALi Somc correspondent ofthe
Bowling Green n diad, signing himsclfG. JR
has seen fit to attach Jadgc Ranuey and myself
with a letter which is q tissue of ials hood and
meannrss ftun beginning TO the eud' hs re-
| pnrds either Judge Ranuvr "r mrscNi evct a.
| any time ur amy place saying - the cu'c vi fct
rvsburp WIS luprlvss," ut iuunabnp any thiuq
al. mt "Gt y g. pronounce the statement uu
onalifedl, hl,e. ] have always believed and
how believe that the law is sui Perry ,bug
/ and have the mrst bhi3lug confidence nov Us
J have alvayS rzprys-ci on, self, no huIug n tho
| end able IN win horse tul stlIf for Ivtry-butr
J 4 have NJ doubt Whatever uI unr ultimate sue
3 cess, an am very sure, that On belief, Messis,
BisScll Gurriil rcEHtl uur case Enud one uut
| that they ton are well satisfied HAT iu the cud
| pcrrvsburr will succacd. lut the oNtrrrne
mcanuess with which Ills litigation is carried ON
! bv Bowling Green, Is without pnr1ll.ltn The MS
] tdty of Courts. When Judge Mckenzie decided
/ the Contest Ease IN our favor, the c0nns'I inf
] Bowling Green were dcsiruns tn take thc case 10
/ the District Cour'. We With The courtesy usual
| amcrr brethren at The Bar, allowed thr case 70
| bc heard upon the original papers, nnt DID
1 nat rnoui,c tic transcript. " we had cnmlglled
! Tho making OF the record aud transcript As We
| bA the rrlt t0 dr. then the expense would have
I fallen ON bowling Green ia DE first Instance, IN
the getting up Of that transcript. But we waived
] the transcript ana Ntiinl'i'A Ilt NN0' W. w
heard in the District Court ON the original tlrs,
aud we're assured that like avors would be eN-
tended tuus. hut when We drsit~l the Sr-
prctnc Court to pass on the questions involved
Ia the case IN aud behold the BIwlng Green
| LAWYERS 20 back IN their words ~ this parilcu
/ lar. Mcssrs Ussull X GDrIill SAYING That they
are now ont Of the case and have no control over
! il MIR. Reid being t,p a,Hoi of d yc,Ysm'h," ~
carry out the arrangement 700 this brlllli, nnd
( brucc we AR, G lmpclrl tp get t'is vuluminnus
/ transcript, simply because the bowling Green
! commiurr instruct Mr. Reid $50 hc srys) tmnka
us all the trouble possible and cause tie litiga-
/ tirn to bc "a expensive as possible, 80 far MS
| fees are crnccrncd the bowling Grccn Commit
! tee had better lanl II. H. u. as one ol ihen)
nay Me,SIs. Bsspl IS GoriilI thcil fees aud not
have thpir ntt',s throat iHuiuu tn place lur bill
for services In the hands uf opposite counsel for
/ suit. aud this before they criticsc the charge
of the ATTORNEYS for Perry shurg. Again ! 7nv
1 our case !. q good one, 0ul It must and shalt bo
Gnupht out On that line II /, takes years. As
hong rs live AID am able to handle q pen YOU
may rest assured that all IN my power will be
done towards prHvrutlng tho county business
going to Bow ling Green and shall dU 1t ~
chccrfuly without pay as with.
| care not II never receive cent ~ pay Tor
INV scrvic 5 / nm 81 entirely satisfied with the
lustic, NJ thc cause oG the cnnlcstprs and that
we shall ultimately succeed that ! now take
pleasure in saving lr the people of PcrrvsburE
I | am at your scryics from ~ umo ON in tbs
nntter. aud nsk Ne other pay than the good
| will of thpsc whose interests am leryuliug.
There are now two suits pending, both oi
| which hold the public records and county bust
/ ncss AT pcrrvshuru. The contest case in very
/ few diys Win bc lnckctrdn the supreme Court,
/ and no act Of the Commis siontrs in uny manner
! fayoring removal wilt effect Us until these eases
are disposed ct. The sale of the jail was OF no
/ validity whntcvcr, aud the county has NJ such
interest III the Courthouse a, Wlliauthorzn q sale
Of the honsc ur tie site. Both revert to the Key
Estate whenever they cease To b. used for Court
| house purposes. The county has never had any
decd OF the premises it is only held bv an
! agreement, tn be- used for u Court house purpn-
- and not otherwise.
do not desire ,n be drawn into any personal
contest in this matter, nul have refused tu mo-
tcc any vi the former articles eminatng from
! Bowling Grtcu, but the statement Of the article
| signcd q. J. Il. although written by one whom
| | have hitherto respected as u friend aud gen
| temin, is 81 utterly untrue, that can do no
| less than set him right in the matter. II, never
heard from me- the words he attributes to me, nor
did anyone ever hear from Judge Ranncy the
expressions given by G.l H., as coming from
| him. aud below give you his letter, that YOU
may SEE how unreliable and untrue such state
mcnts are.
/ have the honor to be yours truly,
J. Il. TYLER.