Cedar Falls gazette. [volume] (Cedar Falls, Iowa) 1860-1895, 1869-06-04
DISTRICT CouRT.--We are indebt-

thus far, out Of docket of three
hundred and twenty:
LAW.
M. Rosenbaum & Co. VS. w. L.
Brown. Judgement for plff. Mo-
ton for new trial.
| j. w. Plummer VS. t. Gordon C.
Son. Dismissed at plif 5 cost.
S. w. Hopkins VS. III. T.. Hurlbut.
Dismissed at plif's costs.
Patrick Moore vs. Jacob Brand.
! Dismissed.
Elijah Gregory VS. Luther III. Barnes.
/ Settled. ..
George Brier VS. Luther II. Barnes,
Settled. A IF2 PCT Mt rrFY1
Abraham Turner VS. Chas. p. Camp
bell ct al. withdrawn.
]. ID. Caldwell VS. Adam Smith ct
al. Default on note. .3lh# aGg
Charles Marshall VS. 7. l.. Miller.
Dismissed at PITTS costs.
Daniel Case VS. Marcus Knapp, Re-
ferred to s. III. Packard. - VI
Moses w. st. John vs. Oscar Cole.
Withdrawn. .. -. u-....
Mary Tyrell ct al. VS. Barnet Sher-
oft. Settled. - s.at
Daniel Geist VS. II. II. .Geist. Dis
missed at plfr's costs.
Townsend & Knapp VS. VIM. T..
Ladd.I Judgement for >plif's for debt
and costs. ..-f a .m....-,a---.s.
Thos. Falvey vs. Samuel Baum ct
nj. Venue to Circuit Court.
Samuel S. Taylor VS. John J DAILY.
Judgment for plF. for S5ll.60 and
costs.
John Melhop vs ]. White. Judg-
ment for S4l3.47 against property at
tached.
S. w. Hopkins VS. Calvin Roger.
Judgment for debt and costs on prop
erty attached.
Aultman, Miller & Co. va Calvin
Roger. Judgment for debt and costs
on property attached. r,
Anderson & Cults VS. Thomas Smith.
Withdrawn.
Samuel NJ. Eby vs Calvin Roger.
Judgment fer plff. Clerk to assess
damages. -
Van Brunt & Co. VS. Isaac p. Welch.
Judgment for plff.
71stNat. Bank, Rondout, n. y. vs
John M. Perkins. Judgment for
rlff. ~ad
Saunders Bros. & Co VS. c. j,
White. Judgment for plf.
Frsst & Fardy VS. ID. G. Williams.
Judgment for plT. Property attach
! ed. l. - f. g.. VI
Enterprise Varnish Co. VIZ G.. T..
Parker. Judgment for pllf. against
G.. L. Parker for S1l859 and costs.
Continued as to Jacob Briggs.
A. Truax vs. IL. Eastman. Judg-
ment for plf.
Geo. Bishop vs. Geo. Rector. Dis
missed.
Geo. Bishop VS. Jno. Hewitt. Judg-
ment for plfr.
]. II. Jones va Isaac King ct al.
Judgment against Isaac. King and A.
SchOfield, Continued as to Henry
King.
CUANCERY.
John III. Leavitt vs Warren III.
Curtlss ct al. withdrawn.
Charles Mullan VS. Hiram Kilbourn
Judgment against plff. for costs.
Knapp, Stout & Go. vs. Henry @.
Nicholson ct al. Default against
Emma Nicholson for want of answer
and decree of foreclosure and order
OF sale of property without appraise,
ment.
J. II, & a. Longneckcr vs. w. f.
Brown ct al. Dismissed ut plff's
costs.
Roswell A. Kennedy w Elizabeth
| Spatiord, administrative. Dismissed
at pIl''s costs.
Henry Mitchell VS. Daniel Hon,
man. Decree as per stipulation, al
plGr's costs.
Flour City Tube Well Co. va w. ].
Ackley ct al. Dismissed at plfr's
costs.
G. a. Drainhrd ct al. vs J. G. Akin
son. Dismissed at plff's costs.
w. l.. Redmond VS. Aaron J. How
ey. Settled.
Black Hawk Co. for School Fund
~ Lucinda Baker ct al. Judgment
for plfT.
Philomena Chambsud VS. Catherine
Howery ct al. Dismissed.
Elizabeth Mcclure VS. sylvanus
Corbct ct al. Judgment for plf. and
decree Of for foreclosure and sale.
Henry-Anschitz vs. Royal Kennedy
ct al. Judgment for debt and costs
and decree of foreclosure aud sale.
CRIMINAL.
The criminal cases, I'm addition to
those OF NJ. w. st. John and Frank
Vaughn, reported in the GAZETTE
last week, We're: t.aJ Z
State VS. Saml. Wilson, malicious
mischief, trial by jury, defendant &C.
quilted. p. ... <f
State VS. Hubbard Frost, assault and
battery, trial by jury, conviction
Judgment withheld till Wednesday
State VS. Peter Mellinger and Mary
Bowman, lewdness, trial by Jury,
verdict against Peter Mcllinger.
JEALOUSY OF GIRLs.-A writer In
Ese,y Saturday, makes the startIinp
revelation that "kirls are awfuily
Jealous of each Other / should cal
this thcgirls' distinctive fault. See
them when they are introduced, OF
when they first meet nj bal, or Gro
quet party; see how eoldly crltica
they' look at each other, how inse
lently sneir eyes roye over every por
sion of their rivals diess; read In
their faces the outspoken storn a,
the result of their scrutiny. .Yol
think you have done it very well
but yquilaye made flight of your
self, and 1 am much better thar
your Watch their disdain of tn,
more admired among them; an;
how excessively naughty for attract
! ing so much attention they thinl
that Ada or Amy is, about whom til,
young men cluster. How bold sn,
is! how affected she. isl and Oh
. ! how uUlv aIa isi -npnafi,y os II tba,