, 1869-05-05
THE COURTS OF LAW AND EQUITY.

I'uffe,t stN1rS cIrruit Court,
rown 'e" s'9''S' - 'sst -eN''' y A'''
hnte :ss ta,se e se, III ye;og Hog.s saE same two
IN tnese maHe!A wh!sn nave CONNECTION VIII
suc - rs -, - - 4sss s
taehnsnts were & issued II q she nsss fwo &c e1ses anu
@ s mrs +t.'o ~ ~ ror.a2 - ror.a ~
ne zec,trity n ;he rs,srnrs /; heinz undcrs;ood
hnt me eonnE olsta5 ante9n 70 9ass qoTm s Ito1l
!aGn raII u tns e. sase ]ais'at ~ sene.:sua,
aas sss eeree " 3as = ss Is W assass
George u: G4shlnf, Al me SUI OF tne toonte2e
Koboer ohpans. tos ssSS' ts ann cosGA iMS ss ~
C,shnhn patent iot tae use Of gum elastE;, snt,
pnut auu neat IA 'he niaaa1acture ol oso'at
p'afes, &c.
dames y. IAN :. Josluth Seta et az LETT
men! ioE the so9thSast auarer ?, sou nean qa1.
ter o. section y: arg 'ae NORTHWEST aa - S anu
tnntnWesE 9nat!eE e ssntnSess Annast r. u. ~
sion y, AM kne no.tneasa ~. .ue mue III,
vest quarter; hlso the sonfnea:t A1astef anu eass
Ell 81 s saf 81 soires
The west s'de OF vest aa 81 soatnea5t @ qnastes q
Ssetlqp Tssi Maa vi ~ tnunsS n nSSh7n n'''a 'Sne
FAnS ~ p1acs nee's"su no ~ v. neu!- ~ 1u'.sa-
E'eetaHn1 'of DIVA " III "" = " e'sne'a'.
In 9ankruptey.
>aa. = AMfAankat at ~. :<"ea"e s1a'Sea-Heosse L.
NcWteu, OF tn!caso.
nt@MaJ.F7-siohn n. WAtfe. q tteafy county.
Nset1rSe 0lYsss'-D1ulet n. barton, O. Ch-
cafEo. r.
VT ; tLuGls Z =, "iie
Mn1as - rhir,,6 - FS'"e'' o' ea'eaeo' II H.
STRICT r.ocF OF 1spEu-EnSE~.
I, III rat tne ta.'Ss h. " an., " Aaua.A. en
70 the effect OF Judgment rendered Ia the Circuit
nt ~ ssepasusou Nu,nsf, Y tS.s, iot 49,.
The Hessief an; obceton was ~ sr ~ H. e1oy
ns na,,ust Up ,, 6 me s,I. I.smsns M salm
Inc Iacts u tne case ssem % oc that II was
Judement confessed: ur!er warrant OF a:;osoer,
npou note given where the anlo.nt vas aot pre-
eSe 1ss as ts amcaa. a bps s
was no accounting between the parties, and 40
regn!ar agreement made between them BY whlca
one to the Other. The question L. whether 1t ts
not competent for the Aest9pee, as representing
the creltoss to look tuto the amount OF this note
and }adment, aua determine what vas The exaet
thar i can BE- Hone. Tie memuranlvm Urou the
edeei: III Is quite Clear that, III tals case,
tue note on WHICH judsmen1 wss
entered Up was given on supposed
II Is certainly tue thsf thar the creditor Il onIs
entitled TO The a4sual au,uQut due. Tne,eloSr
shsll require hIu to su:e and prove that halance
hocrs, papers u,l,i soche7s Ia hts po:sesslup, In
reIxtiot n the amnunt ~ rho hsianfs ami tfere-
fOrr shaH rrrer the mattAr I,acs IL the ISry;ssrr
viii fhs n1icr Tnc crrtitor ohiectet m ths nm,
TnnM th,t fne1 9ars nta, .+ta,s ~ ~, ~ ,nsf
hnH nothing to do Win this ascnunt Thst mey eg
he ~ Int Il ia tha rcht ri tht, AMI n III.
assisnee to knoE Y ha; vas the psecsse ss.ance ice
for which Ihe note WA piSeu. II ~ m. ike t6e
case wherc there Il = injecting OF ereditor ani
debtor Il which fherr il taance strucS. ar,i an
au.ouns adu,.1;ed to be dc. Here lie note VA
ci-rn fur coptccsursi naians. This Ia raft1c3l-
a,y aprl:cab:e to tbs case, -hese the bankruptcy
proceeding is based on thu cyosnsi Of this being
Judgment rendered tn vtolat1on Of the Bankrupt
laW snail! therefore, refer the matter back to the
Register And ahall also require thu creditor to
support bis books, &C, br bis own deposition and
which the note was given.