Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-02-20
THE COURTS.

GaaaGeHor.-The following order was
made by tho Court yesterday: "Tbe
Clerk and Master is hereby directed to
give out papers to 10 one except the
regularly enrolled attorneys Of this Court,
OF upon their order, he shall take their
receipt for the same and file it in the
place Of the papers. No attorney is 81
Iowsd to keep cut the Clerks Office any
papers longer than ten days, and shall
deliver the same to the Clerk or his
order within that time. No attorney
IS allowed on any account to let q paper
De taken out OF his office, either by an
other attorney or by any n else, but
must return the same to the offics of the
Clerk and Master. If the Clerk and
Master discovers that any attorney has
violated . part of this rule he IS hereby
ordered not to give out shy other papers
TO him except by an order Of Court. The
Clerk and Master will give parties a
receipt fOripspers whenever returned, Ii
they desire it."
Court adjourned to Monday ; the fol-
lowing cases are set specially for that
lay
673 Keith vs. Dryfus.
6I6 Watson We Watson.
81 Stout VS. r Indolph.
G7S Miller rs Wsrield.
Csc WOleott VS. Lsdd.
GS2 Peasants VS. Walker.
$50 Meath vs Smith.
572 ROstiek Va Adams EK &c,
G92 Horton vs. TeylOT.
Gy3 McC0mbs VS. LOoney.
694 C!siin vs. Chri5tsl.
G95 Hawley VS. Christal.
597 Cherry vs. Hodges.
GJS Hare vs. King.
G99 Marks VS. Asker.
700 Stout vs. LarkiG.
TQl CrenshaW VS. SUOvall.
7G3 Mcknight VS. D.ll.
7U4 Iyden We Flsnnery.
TOj HoOten VS. KrOkeT.
FG3 j. chvsrne VS. EtehYgrne.
7O7 Jones Us Armour.
T0S Allea vs Watt.
700 May VS. Ayres.
TIG Cloth VS. Wolf,
I'll PATkham VS. Walker.
II3 Murdoch VS. B2eigalupo.
IA Eckerly vs. Wolf.
The Clerk and Master will take an sc-
count to-day in the case Of Pfannesteihl
We. Lehman ct. al.
CIRCUIT COURT-Ge George ". Reeves,
Judge Tho following Judgments were
entered in this Court yesterday
Webb vs Seymour, Judgment fer plain
tiff, 1928 81.
Mcdonald, guardian, VS. Jones ct al,
Judgment for plaintiff, $l037 20.
Mcdonald, guardian, We Ward ct al,
Judgment for plaintiff, 1903 %.
Mcdonald, guardian. vs. Wiley ct al,
Judgment for plaintiff, Sl037 20.
ijmsn, sdmir, vs RsnfrOe, judgment
for plaintiff, $3.50.
The Jury ia The case OF State vs. Gsrvin
and securities, returned a verdict for
plaintiff TO the amount Of 1886 20, and
the Court ordered hat judgment be ren-
dered for l24 per cent damages on the
amouat.
The following cases will be called for
trial to-day
% Nelson ps Memphis s. Ohio r abroad
Company.
SO LeftTieh vs. HineF.
106 Hawley VS. Stockley.
l07 Miller VS. Jones, administrative.
ITO Uihmsn vs. StillmRn.
Ill Same vs. Same.
l12 Wynn We CreashRw.
Il5 Cash, sdm'r, VS. Bolton.
rs Mathews & Co. vs. Aydlett 4 Co.
80 Cash, admir-, vs. Patterson.
I22 Sale vs + wton,
I23 Berry VS. Bailey.
1874 State, use, etc, vs. Smith.
I25 Hook VS. Thiebald.
III Harrison, ext'r, Va Thomas Adams.
I29 Memphis City r r Co VS. Cremer.
1876 WssveT, trustee, VS. Weaver ct al.
l3l Beck VS. HuppsTt ct al.
1872 Frederick va X altman.
1873 StoBer vs Keltman.
1874 Hsffey vs. Ksltmau.
l25 Gribe VS. keltmsu.
1856 Hussey VS. Keltmsn.
l37 Roshard We KeltmAn.
l3S Muncreef VS. Conway.
159 Munereef We Conway.
40 Schrsder VS. Lalteg.
al Taylor and wife, admir-, Va Hutch
InsOn.
MUNICIPAL COURT-Ge0. ". WGldTdn,
.THdoe.-There was only one case tried
in this court yesterday, 70 wit: State VS.
Giles Smith, charged with unlawful
service OF criminal process" The jury
found him guilty, and the court imposed
s. fine of $50. Nothing else done. The
court stands adjourned until Monday
morning.
CRIMINAL COURT William Hunter,
Judge.-Ei Guthrie was arrsigned b.
fore this court yesterday morning, to
answer the charge Of arson. The Court
was engaged IN the investigation Of this
case aii day yesterday, and at five O'Clock
had not flashed with the testimony.
tbs above case will be resumed and dis
posed Of this morning, after which the
casa OF the State vs. Guthrie, indicted for
larceny, will be taken up and tried.
The jury, IN the case OF State vs. Nc.
Donald, returned a verdict OF not guilty.
Law CoURT-H S. Lee, Judge. This
Court was occupied the entire day yes
terday ia hearing the argument Of
.,4an1o1 ~ 4hn zoos ~ Watson trnufaa
W. Rem5srt ct. al. no. 1885,. Tnis
case was not concluded yesterday morn
ing. To-day is motion day. Motions
will be heard up to eleven O'Clock. Az
ter that hour the Court proposes to re-
sumo and dispose of the above case.
fails will probably consume the remain
der Of the day, aud no other cases will
be called.
IFyou want good old Megibbsn whisky,
! 90 10 Megibben i Bro, 2sI Main at.