, 1869-07-29
BISHOP VS.. RECTOR.
Closing Arguments Oh the Motion
to Dissolve Mr.. Cheney's
Injunction.
able OratIons by Hon. Al. ". Full
Icr and Hon ". C. Goudy.
a DeclAlOn 10 be Given on Next
Friday.
fiuRSINE SESSION.


nGntnst The Rev. Samuel Chase, D. D., md Other,
tcforc Juacc Jameson ,-ras 1csutned a,o o,,1o.
mi. nm, ,yrr. WV
$780, -
Mr. FllIEA DEEMED.
~. fGLlAh, counsel iof ths conp!Al1aI'
resutned hAs aE4dncut for the continuance Of n
Injunction. no continued to quote from Nj
!nIA asltcie Ia Lae L<sa Isftorfe', 10 SNOW Lua
tue puce o. Cc!e{Man lsd always ne-n con con
fldcfed one 01 pEblc nature AMI Tbcn con
ctfncu public interests. ono I1a1 CONT {;
could late1fGFc nhu hhFc l1,cftestl
io rEescn, iniury: The cass , c. o
Walker ck Wain1ish', which had been eaotcn ~
hf+ Iu1H VAS nol lnta'hs:slcu! WMl tAo PoaiLIo.
WHICH he himself had nsHuu,ed Inc tfouple FAl
there that The aefenanf hA no! Slsen sea ,onatls 70
faith But 10 the present c4te u couto not &c sa,t
TINT Nj. Cheney was Euitt ol any fiolatIun O
t.at he had tot presented his objections Ia time
>cr Was ny. Chtne1s course !cauinR 70 lona
contest From nt rataNiy VIII W1lcu W. sae Ieee'
tl4ucAl Gouft Ha' urncceelnsi nc oiu uos J01se
there would be upeh pfosbcct OF lnat
jhr tate ChisI yusl'ce y iaon. WHOSE decAlo2
Mn* cco1, hah uc!d. 10 tnc t!hScf case. thnt c'r1
1tIhlnhls coH!o pFotecs nnu ENFORCE Fenis con-
ttCtea WIZ tlGte vo.aotaly ntocse1!agA especial:
wErFc .ss;e an1 bcSa unautaoii.ea . preceding
Ind Proceeded In au unauthorized manncr. The
.;usticc had there u!so stated that s,lIGion was
Y"e.t ias'c otlccr. the Justice Ind a,so saii
t;4tt oirta could interfere tJ n.andamus mud H.
Juuc,,on, Now, where n.aI4amus would IIe4 NO
Tie wroDs VI. committed. m Injunction could l,o
10 Prevent It. 81 ILL.,, 1s3 Iii was lawful "a 70
ca,rI a,oIcn hnfsc It IVES laTsul 10 lock tho door
before hc vi IL stnlcn
Eow, nj 10 rTr;ar1btc damage mad multip!lci-
tr OF su,;F. We admitted that tto mere allegation
tie rsattcr was Otherwise n1de npnarcn. to TIC
court. They could sue ~ ,nanaansu. IN trcspass
AID in other ~ays, which would doubtless lead
10 the multiplicity Uf such a thing which couts
<,f Chhncery r1wnys discouraged. What would be
TIE GolscquGncta Ol permitting tho tribunal TO
rrocred Tho csLons prescribed TINT Court
sE,,IthI AM b,r N,t Nyfr
s.ou or hepuaitou.. Now, II he were onij a pda1ou.
lAntt, Inluty TO his reputation would certainly
t-tGtnuon, npd tu.s ga,e q court Of ehanccry
ground Tor Intervention II suspended, he could not
lerfo,n clrIaeai functions, and probably could gel
could degrade hin, ana depotition would tolloT.
The l3lAsiop III t,E AUdAyIt t,atcu thxt he called
be would not "a omil he VOID aTeaca. scn.
trate" nnT purc. Mr. Cheney declined to
admit nujthlux The nccounts1of what haf-
d:ctreJ Mr. Cheney sEpro fn4t tho Hl.uoo
tatcd Tint h. stolit lir htug1t 70 t1inl uod de-
hc srnt Lc wolId nc deposed. The bishop denied
le k:i that the complainant, should be brought 70
the ot,lef The bin t.no avtfrcd ttnt tie DlshoD
atid he would select no one who had signed cef-
pn - p;o,ss wnch NJ. Shsns5 hsa
POW CT 10 protest. ns craniner. Iai:n1er ana Ridley
til, against Nomaahlns tendencies, The fact
;.sm Irn2 ts,Iir ~ asst..m on ~ M i1'f aJts
a,.rn,i ti..t nc Bshon said snai taoss VA avned
NJ I.rcttat were aisaoacst aud ,mnofal- Hal
Ttc ttit fnrthcr nrcrcd that tnc nfsbon MN =,
cnonse tie Isl ron which ttc rssessnrs rere 10
e = 1ks3, ait EEK as 70 p5oSouhee asseaSe and ron
Sn1, wInt wsstse cff+ r. or ,enn.itinn- II y,o,1a
Ett onIy DESTROY the .cnnniatnantts cnnnrcti.n
",uun In that ,nrner,ion h,d !. nacs ~ s,,,S
~, Thc rn1nI-,nn,t hsd rrctIuey r,iIs r. nrcscb
IN o:ner pal,sass @ as an atSaasea ss.a!y Tae Gu,
an maas -. n,ni' nn 49, I n' MS ~ u9poseu I
Tnc cns ntsn n-axttnd hava ~ ~ aueasi
4o;s. ia ~ = ~. ~ 49, ~ W oeyo
m'a's.eI %oala oe ses.o1ea H 70 me nnrcns pro.
s ~ ~ 49, ~, - - - ~. @ UoSIss ~
Ihose provisions, years we're required 10 o5saln
etIs - tSts a ~ ,na.to, ,s Nm. 49,,
ct t,ncE N 1hs frcn but r. sscsmso wh,.,ns, Il1s
1oyu nnr nos,tInn i11 ~ ulc,edt i,on ea;
Iountv \ tu ~. 1IuI Sn1 u;uu e H.
scM n e cr".d ,n,r.IT ..nd nnnt7 re d.1r
s,ation uot,re i be- ct1en q esnu dsaoess at 10
sh t1i. - - - 49,. o - - ~ th i,nc" ert go ~ ~
ritcrrton ~ the hisi hcre is that Il ths u;sne1t
follow, tic cotupfnnant canno. of,lcate n Any
Of Ihc ,icceses ca,lot 70 ucn:od TIC sentence. be
i, ever 70 itjecai Tn,a Il denied. and hcrs il
lri,nle ryAt q .soterly, the nigh, Of means ol
o. ,u1Qpc,ious, THIS ground being 20 established.
lie Court nas sosIl CrvauI on WbIcn to sIsud. aad
t,n \ s nou, 10 ioI:o4 n1 reasou of ihesc Iae:s
q f1 II Enaa nas sps,
liz rn,lt.n attention further 10 the crnon giving
nfrcr Il, N,sGun7 vhta cItrryman aunder i'm.
!u,,ua1Ion of h.y;n- Elsewhere" cum1,ttted WroHr
s:.Iy Ittin III I:riIIr Ion In nrerent hIr, froni
l,riciaf,nr nccut]nv to his once. Srch nr,,vi
e;uus nrIre in t,.s cnmn]ai,snt1 II ths thre.s ~
cc,usit,vll i caiT,ed out: hr.elore, IL the NO
- Ifr ~ mn tti,rct ~ roid ~ he
II nnr1t Tr could snos NJ HI. cnnrt WoId inIrr1err
Gui,ns,i mi ,uyS IN Tie a;ir.a,ioa taat he haJ
,.eixM 40 +i"hI ~ nSics, ~ the ea1,,, +.
w. o ~ t t!A Ii ,@r,5 rts ~ ~ taS ~ .iita ~
seIsen OF "ulsr1. iie couiu kee no posslote !se.