, 1869-04-10

Damages laid Il $4,000, WITH odpfds ia aid. Tnts
= ss9 sss e. ri r. z os;1 Rg M % T. .as
INLET" and "vlllain, . and = one WHO would
len r. s,ans la ne Ind stofsa Ssa rom se ossa In
drel and could not pe ssfely trusted: thai hs WN
= dishonest and id fAscA and Bco1ndfrl"
IA1KAAEuMR DOVER
teTes ef TnsTess - foT do1e M u Tnesc
Loul, Block AoTsans sahdistzion n
tne south haN ot east hau Of southeast quarter Of
lsts ssss + = As;4ss sssaesa Il :; ,ss1 II 'n'
LoN p y, = q, u Block !. Dasts' Addition,
Fifty three lots from TO q In Hloef >, ma
1ny-thrce lots from TO q, both lnelas!Te, In
Block 4, Davis Addition.
I.Ft more suits were yesterday commenced on
the chancerJ side Of this court Icstf1ln the Col
lector Of Internal Revenue from pairing MONEY de,
posted for T1ce aptrlt metres Into the Cu!tesl
States Treasury The parties deposited the &nouns
prescribed for the metres - prortiea By the prs-
s,s circular Of the Revsnps n e.
rllins before the metres were furnished, they
claim the return Of their deposits
The contest as TO the possession and custody of
Charles James John AcC&Ithy, m infant cntla,
scsoas o mnor i 1he SOD Of tie ate vc;or Charles
should % ID te stvsn orer to h!s mother aai brother,
the executors Of hb 1as, will and te1sament m
lta4, the willow remaining unmarried and tn the
Immediate vicinity, residence Of the afore-
sald gua1d!anA they cnoose 10 allow hsr 70 s'esp
the right even then being reserved IN the execu-
to1guarllans 10 take the boy from It's mother at
r ss sa So efH eP se ea
from The mother esen before the will WAS died for
probate The mother, Kate Agatha, then ap-
ie haSe er sonnR sne Il u home e Al
ordcr was entered Of record, ordering tic dellv-
~ Of the child to It's maternal gaardtan pending
m ass mol Of but sh' m g. Tnanoese as
uncle came Into court and prayed an appeal from
the order Of the Court Yesterday the Court de-
to lts nature nnal OF one affecting Of dsPosing OF
The merits u the matter IN controversy, the parties
WERE not entitled to an appeal ~herenpon ne &c.
The mother, and 1t Is understood that her child
waa delivered into her care, pending the further
action Of the court upon the will, which Ia to he
contested.
Recorders Court.
DIVORCES GRASIKn.
Theresa kFnuAe y, FraZ kf2uae, Proceeding
UlbIe r. Van Tuy,ev. Rodolphuz y. Van Tayle.
Decree Of divorce on the ground Of :descfton. 1t
apPears trom tie 4sstess rspo!t taa; tne parties
Of August, 1854 The following fettef was tnrro-
duced tn part to prove the teisE,!on: T., ,s*,
~Dt4n WuE: Your letter. askins tn trturn. Is
Surt r.rysI Ars tld ron otc' fE IL :hai left ynt.
With the intention of living with fol aE2ln sad
1hAQ kt~p MY Wori YsH deIrod u1on ths1 our
married life II rnd for shsu have nothing tal1.er
TO do With soa- From yoIr lusl,1nd,.
The wife testsnc,t that she had beiort khst re-
ce!yt.1 letter stmlar teuor IN which be begged
Of her not to trouble hin further With cores
ponde1ce.
EtOTEXEST.
John Klll!can Wohlcueo '. Louisa Hohleben
Decree Of divorce On the ground Of adultery
The Testimony vas to the effect that the
parties were married ut kcndallstllc. lndi-
ma, on the lrh day OF Octl0ts, 1851
The husband tcsuned that hh wife Waa un-
true to him; that she had r8lsed scandal IN the
netshborhooi Of inelr home by her loose conduct
and especially by the fayors she shoHeEed upon
one Iui Iitu8 Under these circumstances, and Ia
hopes Of procuring reformation, be removed with
her 70 Ctllcagp, whence, he charged, Rhe clopett
In company with one William Kinney after having
acknowledged supreme uau:htincss Of conduct
In association With that individual, to MI. West
ertnau Nj. R Bukley, In whose house The de
fcn,lant lred for about two years, testified that
the WOMAN not only received men privately into
her apartments, but on other occasions stayed oni
iatr night