, 1869-01-12

,ssin.t tae snpesv1soss of Lss Count, W II asnas @
9ssass a s9S a, II ss oss
lett. wsteous celsy the ta1 for The pasnens OF
tes os es ri y III n:' ;be
taet sne Marshal duly served the per
ernpiory writ Of nanao.nus On the President OF
&no ,hs eospa a.s - Sec
sesstnh. Nc return has ever cen made by The
d. feL dantr to st's writ. On the ea1 aag tha'
pubs,.; Cd nit aes ot shsir rroeesaSnes. S II .. ihe
~ sons .f.. sdopssi tha S tsloS,n:y pfs.n . 10
""a akalAs, 4 peremp,osy witt Of mando au,
itsutd b sta ~iseri, ort1 Of lhe Enred S.at.s
frr tho No.sheru District of u lnots. etttla2 1t
7 Eogar 1hOnp-on. against Lee ouLsy. has thls
day n1en serted upon the ntm5-s7 Of shls
toard. comuanu'ne The 1cs5 OF tazer 'oi the Day
nsts o! u Certain judgment IN tavor Of said
7houps and aRaInrt Lee County, rendered
upt n tt1ta.n hoi d. Issued of sad ccuaty TO a:d
It the {. .ttrutti efa certain ra;lroa2 md
peIpetually ectolneo b. tns supreme coazt IT I
lowa III m lew Ing IN, taxes for the payment OF
sofee aais ed apen ~. u I'd sease tae
SAID nandonans was =. pled fcf or lstu:n;
to oreJ The ssla irjnIcslon. lseued ., tue 81.
irene court OF lows and duly serTea Is aioee"
ea1o.
ply Win the orucr COM aimed IN sad ers of nun
d1rnRs NitEont violating 1h- constitution Or la<s
Il l.wx a. eohstt ued os he Courts u loHs
Ard also Going violence to ouf oaths Of ONCE As
nc uI derrsa1t II. npd rrIccrin1 uurB-lyes Ea ale
t" punishment fur CONT npt aad Violation Of our
~Hesoi.<d 7h.t sc etsntstly deslr. to o,ey al
orders Of the courts OF our countr1. and d Iot
with to h. IN COZ eupt OF any, out s,t7ated As NE
s1e, ve afe eonpelea 70 oes5 sa'a toio ct 90 and
tlce Of our posrrnmsnt aun taee co11ts. eo.h
S10lt aad Ftdesd!, Tor Psosesflon.'
abe FIX eel n.ems ef= wn1 aptear 10 hsve b"ca
press 1hst day sed wno 1t nlll oe borne in mind.
YeYe paftleb tu so!e su!t and hSd been eetFed
w.sh ptoet ss. nj save one-1ud name him 10
BIZ hon. =, Nerd voted fs sas tesola
vt:e.
hsve e,ren tte who:e Of The preamble md
the rsned. OF ttelf entire Justification, and tho
tubs anc= oft I'll IL tais. vz.. TIA! Ia mattss
*t.te the5. - ei.szsfs o. io*a aas see op"Sa ,Sa
courts If that 6iate OF she 1at1on. shty VIII cid
| tb&dle1ca tn The ectunstds Of The cou1n u Iowa
| An.1 dNleKsrd lhoe1 ot shs ULi Cd otA.es. And
they saapfea thle coustc nlsvr It nsa been de-
I c.dtd bJ the highest cottt Of the n.ilon, In
Oh tiaz case. Mas tsat agulnst t41. and upoo
| bare Known that tho 1prcna Court Of The United
! Il wss supposed tnar the dogma contained In
| The rer.iult ns Just e1tcl VIA exploded or The
1skre Of the late rebellion. Bat It saems hycrA-
/ heac Cd. ano We now encounter u Wlthla the
| ptfccrs Of the ps't1uttc state Of Iowa, Which
s.1uQv1ed as hard - my o1her srase TO e1sI.
it would teen 70 reed 70 aruumert to show
thtt the p.eluon taken oy the board 81 5u2er
| eltots OF Lee ounly Is nEsouEt. II tenablc.
| then The Federal Courts ate encnasnea By State
.snlt tot,ty, AID tatIo: c1etu:e t-e.r ONE decsres
Of tne states. hat Is rDe y ls~ u their
hc,ng. BuE It IL funaamental ptinciRle sh.t
~lth.u thelr epneru they RE rupreue. assaer
| et1stiIulon md taw depends, by thu ~ t+roa*
Of ,re lL-.tuneLttt tt-ea npoa the ae5odtcations
of The sutrems SonH Of ne United - sces. e..
tioed That the parties shon!u obey 'ne naunsfe
Of r. uesA court, stae C. nfte must yield. Inis
einmcnt, snd. therefore, IN CERTAIN coctferet4es
| wits It tt1nr teGue 10 the htshc5s coafl or
stAsc to ss te judgment Or asssse, anger m "a a
II IL Gpon III" eane Principle thst fns act ol
March i, 1881 vas ps:ted At the tnc of toe 5nu h
tsfolsLa troubles Ios eonfls o. re me- catsa n1
ID 9hs nsnfrapt Jaw Ut ise7. in various ~a1s 'nte.
.bs ~ tls e. 81 @
tf,s. TO establish nssfotu laws on the tuo]ect
: 81 bsnk.upte1es. "henesct IN taHJ,us out
act urnn the courts. OF the States, the
latt er Eunst xtve Va and sn tho ttntIe reas2t
that h. su' hos u'{ 'he former Is ar4Eoun'; 4
must be 70 uud ous ryar<rn. far it I. refE ci.ar
II the doc'r:Ee low sought 10 he N itn1slned o.
| the dslerdants prevailed generally the ue u u
0tHQ9 tGH StAltD. 1tlOH u
at least, would os severed at once. What, th:te
fu,e. 1he cefendarts are required to DO IN th.!
case IL noahitg new, State courts and Julxe
have ooue II oisn acd neeau.e they believed thes
ostha Of nee required It uudrr tue s1xsh AZ lex
of,be constitution. hich declares that tne.la Q
The Cn1:ea Slater - made In nu:sut1 tnerco
) - aho y the suprsus |9u Of fhs t7ad, aut
| the JncRss 10 overY state shall be oouud laett
/ ~. anyiht.g In tbs ooasstts,so~ Or saus Of oa
; STAFF 10 fhs contrary aosie1*ttds n1g.
! TEr MapdAtc Issued from tnls Cont Is LAW
theee d.fesdaut., expressly decided to be 20 b
!. ,6e supreme Court Of me Unitsd states. II
?. nssrf Stoasa esn nc board q sap
s1ecss Of Lee County, IN tnat Stat. place then
i selvts 10 etrspe tts binding ebliRatIopi
IN su,ss reis. TO dectoa al legal questions oFo
Il crlJ coming before them under rne eorsutu Ii
2 azd iaus ofthat state. aud ne parties thete'o =
| eoEc!oded BY such ec'ston; but when they dectc
! differently IN o,ueEert cases npon tae stns po.n
: aud ii, supreme curt Of tho United states ..
soop1ed oas eossse o. e saa 5e sss ~
r. tes to cobuovsrties IN the cerre u me cn.e
ssss e11 'Fa9ss Es9s2, Goar q mFs
u ihey M pose the nghr ruling has not eeen 10
,s l0xea. s,,.em
Coprt Il Sht United sta&es uas otess1ieo ite oS
pre stous DECISION, made IN eeccsaance I'LL H..a -
juden OF otate soart In order 70 ht, ,o'n nv
be 4 i,m.s 10 sncn dsr1a toa.. and shat Court %
freauently f.llod 10 ssu sufficient reason tor =
sIaae aes 1here Il b.. refused 10 adopt the laA d.
e ctsion Of 4 csate {. uss.
d It1s tIue inesu WAS not connteee harmony :
/. nntnicu auuoog tte Ludges Of the Snps.ue Sont
.r Of Iowa Iof hsa there heen slnonR sae JaaR,
j. The supreme cour: OF Tbs Cn1ted S:aes up u tu
]. question IN canEoree=y hetw.e thess pasnes
Il cut that Ia cot uneonnon. II is atoe1sIsa -
Judges That gives rtse to n0s: n<,. 1os Cnot,
~ r. cfesssd 70 .ss.e II
sdjuac.se On the seht. Of r. conE1 " te tS
u Inits noF u oaa'! p h.sn e.t,bi1shed. not bT
/. nnan,rn n. C1u1t, Of Which mnch OF u
o1,sd:etoa T. aan.ars!+ ~ - n,n, a.
/. dem.nt;. t erc should be Al end OF leEL CO
RI synTs1y. aqd. n. Erfpre. ~heu the decision Of
D. rnmte,. nj court ct mai resort In case *lth1n
ID | inI,Idtctlon Is given, u to that, the doat
be TjIfsr ftun m opinion which has inst bes
N pun4lhed OF the supreme Coar1 Of lows. ii
ct Ut LIB suppose to Do Aotne1rc. tina Ja 1Ate4
o! rtst MI 1otend 10 Adhe1e 70 ~ = e. Fanngs
to question tnetr Right 70 DO ro. cut it seedss 30
n 10 lnttuatiou eSrn thnuao be gtTnn ffosa wh1
II con d be lnsesred that in = cor alcs ii ~ -
u case, besween she cont q ths sas a sad o. Of
L. /, ts eiear 1hst il the VIZ iakea Of the sahi
1e | By the deiepe aIt4 Ant It would teen. iufptf'
&C HenneelyAnle that these tete: danta could ha
taken rhets coursr without: SONS rc3-oa 1or
oe ltevrK 1hat they ~.u!a bh sustained. 4ndes
tney disunc'J say, eltuatsd ~ they arr, they \
ed tat.on, ios tupposr- Itis ns1aeult 10 camp.nhe
llc y what acdr Of rcstoEtux they reached the Ct
e}n4ion- they could rely upon fetexl Cont
proteet1ou s2a nat iho eo1sequeeees OF their 2,
nf- / deHh<fat4 dltob~Atenc& of ft9 osdt
In Rcffa Court 'hat cannot and will net snfosca
a decree Is thorn al one Of ita tf1neipsl Taon
The judgments Of the telasor wsald 0oeo'