, 1869-07-28

ceanon, snd u Ha1 only AFTER eIhaust!n1 .r, their
tsss sp9Rsls6 A. 70 1pa 70 y
Ine 1hn grsa:et portion Of Ihe srvanenr ne Of
sts':s2sa esa:'st9,a ~ss ss,,a sss ~
question Il tse bar. Tie aeesion n u prr.sn.es
u The hl1I, The anawer end adilayjts 90 de.
aaesous .o e f Be Il ~, Ths aps
Gontt had dons according to The canons, the con
slltut!on and the law Of tne Chyrrn. or not aud,
eosa.snce Of n spp,ieaion 10 restrain snesu md sad
e.sI Ieitnem to 70 according to the canons: In
is III II, i ihss .. ss5 e
As..5a, As,s5 Fuller apa Iuca e .hs Di.nop,
ssid i rs, Written to s1o.d c.s%i % proeesdlns.1io TO
| nee II ~ acceptable Boani ot Asseseora could NOT
he we1l on to review ihe proceedings ia Lite the
cathedral on the I'D instant, read tbs di1esrut
lnEesz pF4eEte1 y Us complainant, and con-
san a r. asPpn'1a L. asas s'sa 'ss !ss Rs'
y con4enon Of 1ss hsa u bsen bseahso aIoo
cd b. the D!ocete Of Illinois, 80 ~ 10 e1cct the
comp.tnaas Ia ne proceeding. h.amaca As It had
General Convention.
lie then sa,d he xouiI read an ntndas1t which
Of The canon, bit inc counsel for the defendant
Objected Il. Il had nos been submitted TO hin Tor
peIuaal aud the Court elbtalned the OBJECTION
The Hhcer case wzs precisely like the present
oDs, pbly the eharges wcre dineseut, and the
opnlon Of Judge Wilson In that case was entItle1
70 Rltat consideration, % u was conclusive on The
poInta lnsoifeu-tAe vital md turning points In
!he case. lie then proceeded 10 read ihe extracts
Irum The opnlon which were read before the
Hssesrnrs on the Pa iuetnne. The counsel Tor tic
aefet dant hni coptended that lbs Hsaop, ,by slrtoe
o as sis1toftal powers, could, u his own flee ru
sn1 SnnR Clergyman TO punish hiu1 for otIcnces
Committed. lie de1nurfeh aud objected 10 any
sGch construction ut the c8hOns bf thu Church.
i!e heft c!scd casea from 18th Vermont to show
me Jurisdiction OF Ecclesiastical Courts. md
ea1I ihat rom rrecedcnfsias Ecciesaa.icA! Court,
IL constituted had no jnra1Ictinnt tn the cutplIu.
ant case, 1u conclusion, he cphtcn1ed that the
coIhpallAhi's buf presented full and ample cauba
1T tht Court To iHirfCrhe nnd LrtG tue EcEIesIas-
!ffl totiiI HflHin the raroha or atop Il altogether.
NC mad cfrrT ttasG ~ fcar that II tue tr;al wcnt
or before .h~ tribunal AS now constituted, lls |
client Wnt1d be ltrNtet nntl &nf1tr tho rIn1afae
s,'dfHGaI't counsel bad argued that 1t would not
1ollor. ...
MI ftlikn ON TIE pAMk FInE.
flf, 81. ". II LtEk fonr ell nlap ol behalf Of |
t1f foflrlaiaauL IL saiA shH ta'HHA.s fur TIM re-
eohlfits nal tTcHrd tile cas-" Win teclarati
.nhs no aFprnfvo fur ~ christian lEopfo WIN
MeIc tlt"f'J 'Mtrfctrd ~ thn P"nhlHR gJsstfnnH |
leal Inc gralictihh or thrtf rurrta ahBlld hR |
t1entr4'. consequences which he III nut lescI,s.
u Ms MT thu nftt tllnu "t,faniy - LAd A,rHnt
tho tFttrCtiuh III the tIAnn VI Christ IN Htilnr |
" rnfnrr Itsrtf utou those thnt It 5ul'r .upJeut
" H. He sprsart@i Alsu OH tlrhaIf Uf l'hrIaxn
pnHplr who fsfcH IN knDw wfirthrf Their rtrtkt.
tnan anh fhtinsrvea Afe u tn titlIlHi religious
!ihFty 1Dl outside VI. tut tpAn uf TIN EAlp Ut the
e'hnrtlt that lflrJ love EyprY Dla III tho slieKh-
ttDna WAN an fRNAIll4i NxrfHIrnt trrcA%arr, IN
hurr 10 rEd NJ u ttist "iFtrlnralie Injury
Wh'Ch MS suite IN n8prpn II Tho 5.r.
c1rsIastlrpl Cont ~ wrra p.tinistch to Kiye 4
h ' II fsxFII FtSG