, 1869-04-23

VI the Pharmacy for defendant, who WIS to fur
the net 1rpts Ia lieu Of fixed salary, then plaIn-
tf1t WIS the mere Servant or agent and not the
EsFtneT OF defendant
tue emtlosment being unaAed OF expired, mud II
defendant discharged him and requested him to
leave the stose, which ha refused to do. claluing
the right 70 remain, IN defiance Of the defendant
WISHES Whereupon be WIS elected from the prem
tscs no mure force than necessary being used,
t'en defendant Is 1astincd.
ortin Rogers =. Gustav Fisher {sherD. Re-
tlevin Of office furniture hatness bottles IN bar
Trnis y, VanWyck =. bernhard Behreud At
tachMent on the allegation OF fraudulent convey
ance Of property, stock and fixtures Of store No.
ssi:o :S South eafk street. Indebtedness suited at
Ssn es y Iii & or Fl ee Nn% " an
west 1hrty-el9ht feet of Lot 9, BLOCK i, Euzie's
Addition, alleged to hare heen contracted by
IN Jay q May, isss, fol The consdefaton to Of
$3.50, Ioynlle in tnstalmentA, which contract 1s
Claimed 10 have been transferred or assigned to
HEAVY DAMAGES CLAIMED.
James B 11art, Of Tuscola, :. First National
HanG Of Madison, Wis, ct ala. Case. Damages
nresidcnts Il Is stated that on the epth Of Au-
gust, 1867, one Elijah F. Barton calling himself 4
the Frat Ss1aSai AZ s,S % zach for to
Nhich tho bank purchased, paying sl5,ooo cash Of
Wnich deposit or 50 COO was made, 5000 being
Meanwhile plaintiff claims that, by red.
5en 81 s0%s knoT!eass e matters
th!s time reward OF ees-a0n was offered by the
hank for the nrrest Of him Who had passed the
19rxed @ d6a,ts upGn On It. mhee1pon paint with
he th"ught he had, and caused his arrest conyic-
tton aud sentence. He then Claimed the reward
oricr for $50 being offered. Suhse1ueutly, it Is
alleged! he was arrested on fraudulent and false
charge Of counterfeting nj The iustigatlon Of the
tH.!cE this arrest he was taken from Illinois, and
III Janunsr, 1865, tried anA acquitted. For the 1r-
rest, ts consequent expenses etc, he now sues to
recover.
superior Court.
The causes which were commenced for trial be-
fore this tiny nrc Etill on trial
II. Earon Company :. X. A. Mcclellan Com
nany, Of Noo'!forl County. Assumpst. Damages
1 aH II Mt s'oo tsa; r. tats case sa o. abatement
executed IN Wootifor.l County. The legal qucs-
uUn raised is whether nny proof can Ire received OF
@ an n 1os .us @ @ 81 81 M as
"n.cr The common. courts in ltiifatus nssu,npsit;
md, secondly, whether plaintiffs can recover on
thc lsslit OF ths pien In abatement on III inlIcd
promise Of the defendants rcsi,i!ug In another
county. nnd served with process In another cout-
iiiaL '1'N' ' '1''90' w
NEW Er1Ts
Hiram niFtlsnll et nj. '. N. D. Francis ct ais
Nrr1cyin Of corn Rhellcr.
.......... REAL ESTATE.
Illinois stone Company '. Susan NJ Harris Ct alK
fctitun 10 enforce lnrchanlcs' lien for fappI1 on
Lots =, !. ani 0, block 8, Jones' Addition, nud
j. II. s1'l1lkcn v. susnn NJ IIarrts It als Petition
70 enforce mechanics ilcn Of tcs7pa on property
Eta Michigan avenue.
Jnhn Il llnwley '. Margaret Mun,hy, Elect
inrnt for 1Nt II, block =, te!Iool Section Addition
tSs'''"n ID ~ ~ IT, 4tpa;E1, 4 k11i;
Michael R!si ard hiS xifc, 1fcrulnc '. Fr;e.-
t7rs! K"hciL 1rcApaxa nasnaTcn lnlt at S,'Na
i,1"lant i"rrlhly cntctch uptn their premises on
it': 2c In tant. and nSsanltch the tf1nnn. whereof
q WITH sn sas % Rreat sS ,aar
71Ix aAAf MARE. -
, S,a,ns , zs5 1ns Il ."ss s aa H. na man,
md u brow II hossn. vnIucd al $3o4l
,u.,,, n,.,c,p nISoscM S,s,,s AsxKn ,I'I, raI.
tot tltshrrc with ntl,tnvit Of the nor.rrnltrncr ii
defendant. in lhr I'LL thr defendant H,il,cA that
&c wa inwfnl!y married. to defendant IN the city of
viii, her, treating her always true anil ,iin.
gent 1.'sland bhuuid until nlt0ut thr middle or
aff"m,,s5 " ieea s charges thni & on TIC lsi ar
cause, deserted him, henccfnrwnrl continuing this
dc*crtton, until be Is forced thus TO pruceoi
Dornihea Toteck =. Henry TobecI. Bill for Ill.
rorce The complainant ststra that Ahe was tnnr-
during April Of is4s and that ase i.as Isyctt viii
him VI lii wife nearly all the time yluce, They
came tosctllcr III Is Sii) TO Illinois In 1855, no
marriage horn TO them. She charges that the hps-
band nas been guilty Ut exercising grcat cruelty
,oWar hcE, 80 that at this time shc considers It
over two years he has tEen IN. hnlttual drunInrd
The defendant ts represented to lie the owner, Ia
Is, IL south OF Inc Chicago t Rocs Island Raj,
road 60 acres, aud acIcs Of timber land In the
west Quarter Of Section II ~, !s, With improve
well as considerable amount Of personal prop
erty.
.-... AssuxrstzA
owen J. Gr,1a.hs, administrator Of Charles B,
Lane, v. Patrick l. Gar1ity. Assumpslt Damages
John and Henry Snowcll '. Catherine Derncr.
AssInpsit- damages, 3aA
Fourth National bank Of Ncw York CITY, Al
ages flu,0U1.
Marcus D. Gilman ct al '. Northern Transpor-
.ation u n@ Company OF Ohio. ARsumpsiL Damages
George c. Smith ct a. y. Melville S. Sichola
assunpsit. :sa;I namases 500 su!t brought upon
DAY Of December, 1s6s ai tan days, Tor sso, guar
antecL t,y defendant.
Adam Il. Todd Ct al Y. John Il. Dickson, Of
County. Assumpslt Damages $t,600.
Rufus Il. Terry ct al v. James l. Smith. A.
&
ChaS Kelly :. Myernotle1, alias "Dutch Martin"
Edvard i. Turner 8 Il '. ". Il. L. Miller: A.
Henry T: Helm :. Henry snider. Assumpsts.
namages, 81 ,etN,.
A Mar Mossv. John Clark, Assumpslt DAM
County Court.
re':'e"< r''"""s Will 11I;-t,a ra Drcla1ed settled.
Esta@oi Harriet Harriet Il se5mour: VIII and codicll
l. Seymour, under bond o! sG65I
ADMINISTRATIONS
Estate OF john Holmes. Administration Grant
Estate Of John Wtthc1R 4. j. Ellsworth ap-
pgEEn1sn to 9, nd1nns'cT under bond Of eoo
Estatc OF Patrick Mincs. John Mines appointed
70 administer. under bond Of 500.
Estate Of Mary c, 'dr E,,ea =. r,nso ans f4anccz
SSanneE minors Order tha. the guazdiaa, Alyta
norea o1 peo,sct neo% qs9 a. Why hs aond nothe
ofuer OF court directing him to p1lchaae piano
$40 nor to exceed $50. ~NA-
Recorder'. Court.
4 man named Walter Davis, Indicted for an as
sault With an intent to ray.ah 5oun9 g.r, Calha-
Ihe plaintiff bore the appearance OF being about
The age Of ten ycalA uer statement Of The case
sss s e. e I %
she CHARGED, be committed the offence Iate u
the afternoon Of February 70, she wns sent with
some s1othcs 10 the State Street Iaundry-,he
laundry being near to Monroe street. She called,
on the Way, at the Post once, and received let
o1 Madison and LAsalle streets, When
prisoner stepped up behind her, caught her up,
carried her upstairs, and subsequently Into base
1netr, where, notwithstanding her entFcatles he
caught her by the hair and attempted to carry out
svile purpose She nrst, having pencil noout
her. cndeayored to pick out bis eyes, In which OBJ
lect not succeeding, she cried out 30 that hoy
nonct't the Ailsay, Galno forward and met the man.
tne g1ii then being only assaulted Rs stated. II
= NM also hail that threRt9 were used toWard the
,h ao naEs hct rteid to tho hbIdlnous design Of
ne ne man; When prisoner escaped. she narrated
rno sa1o. passed. whe conducted her to her
.,as a1ases Mean* he the prisoner had run down an
a1ey &C and made bis temporary escape Onthe next
~ saH nln at the corner Of Monroe and Sta1c
sGeeI- sne linen fan homc told her mother OF
~ ~ NNeltaboQts, when efforts wero Iuale to cause
nN alIehl Ae was met On Madison street bridge:
as Ae PASSED the E1r he drew his hat over ts eyes
ann, stopping seemed to bc engaged in ptcSinr
something from the Hrpand. 4 rol,cemsn ma
cs1!ed, and upon statement :. the case fhn nrts
oncf vas taken to the lookup. ''-
before concluding the case for thf PEOPLE The
etntc Attorney proposed to show that = person
answering to the description Of the outragrt 7g
Ulpl4lL 10 her, when She immediately said he s1,,s