Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-04-23
SUPREME COURT.
List of Memphis Cases Set for
Hearing,

Hearing,
/ MEMPHIS LAW DOCKET, APRIL TERM
No. l. John Overton vs. w. T. Hardin
George CAN'T for plaintiff, E. M. Yerger
A. 4. HerrOl and w. Randolph for de-
fendant.
No. 2. w. H. Gillimo and n. Ford Vi
Ben HTris.
No. g. Terry & Mitchell VS. John
League, Clerk, etc; Smith & Kittridgs
for plaintiff, Hanson, CAN'T 81 Waddeil
for defendant.
No 4. Beecher, Schultz & Co vs John
I LOsg1e, Clerk, ETC.; Lewis & Craig foI
plaintiff, Hanson, CAN'T & Waddeli for
/ defendant.
Nc. 5. Iglauer & Pritz vs. John
4 LOsgue, Clerk, etc Lewis d Craig for
! plaintiff, Hanson, CAN'T Il Waddell for
| defendant
Mo. s. Toof, Phillips & Co VS. John
Z League, Clerk, ETC.; Harris, Porter &
( Webb and Barbour Lewis for plaintiff,
( Hanson, CAN'T & WaGdsll for defendant.
/ No. Z. Lindsuer, Arnold & Co VS. John
/ Loagus, Clerk, etc; Lewis & Craig for
plaintiff, Hanson, Can't & Waddell for
defendant.
No. s. Menken Brothers VS. John
LOsgua, Clerk, etc Smith & Kittridge
for plaintiff, Hanson, Can't d Waddell
for defendant
No 8 Lewis, Matthews & Co VS. John
League. Clerk, etc; Lewis q Craig for
plaintiff, Hanson, CAN'T & Wsddell for
defendsnt.
No. 10. WoIeott, Smith & Co vs. John
League, Clerk, etc; Lewis & Craig for
plaintiffs, Hanson, CAN'T q Wsddsil for
defendant.
No. II. McCombs & Co. VS. John
L nsgue, Clerk; Lewis & Craig for plain
rffs; Hanson, CAN'T q WsdGeIl for de-
fendRnt.
No. II. Horace Stone vs. John Loague,
Clerk; Lewis & Craig for plaintiff,
Hanson, Can't & Wsddell Tor defendant.
No. l3. Msck Brothers & Bonn VS.
John Loague CLERK Lewis & Craig for
plaintiffs, Hanson, CAN'T & Wsddell for
defendant.
N~4 LoEenstein & Bro. vs. John
L0sgue, Clerk Lewis & Craig for plain
TITS, Hanson, CAN'T & Waddell for Qefen-
dant.
No. Is Tobin, Lynn & Co. VS. John
League, CLERK Lewis & Craig for plsin.
uff5.
No. l6. Herzogg & Bro. VS. Jno. LOsgus,
Clerk.
No. II, North, Murphy & Mason VS.
John League, Clerk.
Ne. IS. w. 81. Carver vs. John League,
Clerk.
|. No 10 Avery & Bonham vs. John
'LORgue, Clerk.
No. 20 John League, Clerk, ETC., VS.
A. Seessei; Hanson d CAN'T for plain
tit, SU'ith & kittridge for defendant.
No. q. John League, Clerk, ETC., VS.
Williams, Csrtmell & Co.; Hanson &
CAN'T for plaintiff, Smith d Kit
uJge, fJr defendants.
No. y John Losgue, Clerk, etc., VS.
Williamson, Hill q Co.; Hanson Il
CAN'T, for plaintiff, Smith & Kittridge,
for defendants.
No. .. Jzmes H5ff-rmsn VS. Ethel
Porter HEndOlph aud Morgan for plain
iii, Kor tcht & Craft, for defendant.
No. q. Frank Oyerton rs w. J. Ber-
liz; Dixon d Avery and Randolph for
plaintiff, Hanson u Pickett, for defend
ant.
No. 25. Eugene Randolph and wife VS.
William Metcalf ct al: FCute, Randolph
and Hutchinson for defendants, Yerger,
Heisken, Scott * HeiskeII for defendants.
Nc. 20. A. J. Walt VS. Elias Thom psos;
Estes d Jackson f0r plaintiff, Kerr, West
cott * Stahl, for defendant.
No. p. ID. G. Cross vs. 5. r Barford
ct al Harris Il POston and Jarnagin for
plaintiff, Heron, Sherman q Randolph
for defendants,
No. Is James Tate Va Mayor and
Aldermen Of Memphis; r.. J. Morgan
for defendants
Ne. %. A. Lewis & Co. VS. Preston
Ludwick; II Clay Coude for plaintiff
Chalmers & Lee for defendant.
No. 30. A. b. Douglass & Co. VS. David
G. Gross; Heiskeil, Scott q Heiskeu for
plaintiff, Ayers x Randolph for defend |
ants.
No. 81. Lacy Il McGse vs. Moore,
Lewis q Given; HeiskeIi, Scott d Heis- |
kell for plaintiffs, Pike s. Adams for de- |
fendsnts
No. 80 Madison W. Jones vs. W. B. |
Greenlaw.
No. 80 J. H. Wsggener vs. Randle & |
Heath; Graft & Randolph for plaintiff.
No. "a State Of Tennessee ex rel Lof.
land VS. 5. B Beaumont; K. L. Morgan |
for plsintitfs, Pierce for defendant.
No Is. ). b. Beaumont v5 State OF |
Tennessee ex rel Mayer and Aldermen |
Of Memphis; Pierce for plaintiff, + J.
Morgan for defendants.
MUNICIPAL DOCKET, SUPREME |
COUKT, APRIL TERM, 1859.
No. ]. r. L. Laski VS. Abb Kyser; |
PeytoD q LOgwood and T. r. Smith for |
defendant.
Ne. 2. Charles Jones VS. 8tratton q |
GJysr; Bsecher & BeIcher for plaintiff, |
Estes, jackson d McDavitt for defend |
ants.
No. 3. Thomas ]. Coggswell vs. James
F. ColliDsi Walker & HsrTigsn for de-
fendant.
No. 4. Thomas J. Coggswem vs J. T. |
Jefferson Humes q PUston for defend |
ant
No. 5. J. J. Peres & Co. vs William
Bath ; Haynes x Lehman for defendant. j
Ne. s. SJutbern Express Company vs. /
L. kremeT Hutchinson for plaintiff, /
for defendant.
No. I. Hesse, Levy & Co. We jesse W. /
Page es al Heron, Lehman d Haynes /
ior plaintiffs, Clspp, Vance and A. II. Z. 4
King for defendants.
No. 5. Avery q Waggener vs. Mer-
chants National Bank AyTes d Ran
dOlph ana YeFgeF for Plaintiffs, King i /
H8UghtOn for defendant.
No 9. J SchWoob vs W. A. Hill, Re-
ceiver; Morgan, JarDagin q FFsyser for
plaintiff, Pierce d Richards for defend
ant.
No. 10. R Hough vs. Toof, Phillips &
Co. Randolph for plaintiff, Humes q
PosJon for defendants.
No. IL. Z. Wesche VS. BescheF, Schultz /
q Co.; Kerr, Westcott & S,ahl for plain
TIFF, d L. Griffin, Pierce, r chards and
Dix for defendant.
No. II. c. Trgally vs. Mayor and Al
dsTmen Of Memphis Haynes S locktOn
and Hart foI plaintiff, Pierce Il DIX for
defendant
Nc. l3 G. Trigslly vs. Mayor and Al
dsrmen OF Memphis Haynes, Stockton |
and Hart for plaintiff, Pierce and DIX for
defendant.
No IA. II. W. Odell vs Mayor and Al
deTmen Of Memphis; Pierce and Dix for
defendant.
No Is Joseph Lenow vs Mayor and /
Aldermen o. the City Of Memphis S.e-
pheDs and Smith for plaintiff, Pierce /
and D x for deiendanis.
No. Is jeremiah BTyas VS. Mayor and |
Aldermen Of Memphis; Pierce and DIX
for defendants.
No II. T. SaltalsmschIs VS. Mayor /
and Aldermen Of Memphis Pierce for
defendants.
No. Is John Schreiblee VS. Mayor and |
Aldermen Of Memphis j r. Robertson
for plaintiff, Pierce for defendants.
No. -. William Muldoon vs Mayor /