The New York herald., 1869-03-20

which the city loans I'D beea e0osd bus hnted that
he could dscaoss Other leeal transactions unknown
to the House. Il YES O tAs occaston that n. Rouher
the Minister or state, feeling the ground give way
beneath him. and knowing that the Emperor might
announced that on the following day he would
'startle the Chamber By his slncerity.n The Pari-
ssang ca. as o ~ snohsr saS
laugh from M. Olivier, Q redolbtahle rival to n.
Rouher, Interrupted the Minister who said he would
he ds s
but replied N. Olivier, my astonishment has
lasted already 80 long !" few less quiet speeches
day friday did actually present the rare spectacle
The Palais Bourbon was crowded-crammed to
and anxiety reached It's height tl he confessed and
spared no one denouncing every man OF them the
Genteur NJ vintry and N. Farcade de la Roguette.
Inc Emperor was not responsible; his Ma
jesty was only responslble for what was well
done; he had no power to prevent mis-
every one dld not send In bis demission after tier
inflicted came In the shape OF the immense utility or
the public works the increased heathfulness OF the
Paris workmen. the essentially hygienc character OF
the improvements made; and the sewers too, played
q great part They have done SO all along through
this debate. the sewers have done more for exone-
tor has, when pushed in bad corner, had the sew
ers to fall back into.
But muSs not omit the "indiscreti0nn incident,
which Is good match for the '.sincero, one. When
NJ. Theirs quoted the repOrJs OF the Cour des
Complies in support OF his dgures n. Vintry st0utly
denied that the report had been printed In re-
sponse n. Theirs said It was not only printed, but
he had seen . copy OF it. N. Vtntry then replied
that It could only have Deen on the sly, and, though
he did not use this exact expression, he limited
II, adding that n. Theirs might. through
sindiscreu0n," have got hold Of the proofs.
"No, no." SAID M. Theirs, 1.-THE book ls
printed and do not accept the accusation Of in
discretion. II Is not only printed, It Is bound in
NICE, bright blue cover, and have got copy on .
shelf in my lfbrary.n
Poor NJ. vintryl He should have rejected that NJ.
Thers has sharp eye, assisted by q pair Of sharp
M. f. Olivier replied to II. R0uher'5 sincerity and
candor. He said he did not blame M. Haussmann
so much after all as he did nose who had permitted
him to use SO much liberty. He would not believe
any announcement Of Irregularities, and denied the
right OF the government to ask for bill OF indem.
nifty. He wanted the Prefect's dictatorship to be
put an end to- his acts controlled by the munich
pality and NJ. R0uher to retract the thesis he had
advanced In lS67-namely, that expenses based on
future resources do not constitute loans.
Meanwhile the first act Of the City OF Paris bill has
been voted and the second act revised.
For the future no loans are to be made on funds
deposited securities and no shares will be given
out beyond the limits prescribed by the Corps Legis
latn The credit will have to refund the IT, 0OO 900
which have been overdrawn The strctest legal
line Is to be followed for the future and no sum OF
the projected loan is 70 be deducted from its dest-
nation that Of repayng the Credit FOncier FOR any
other purpose.