, 1869-05-19
Superior Court.
1temtnick kleutsch =. John Schneider. Assu1up-

superior Court.
reminiek klcntseh :. John Schneider. Assump-
,.,, MoHK ssrlprGGEar n REAL RsrA!K
William T. ksT V. Levi 1lackEcll onl Charles
~ seeen asa sast af q
southwest quarter, same section; east part Of
west half Of southwest quarter, same sections,
and Lots to 5, II 10 4, y to 60, all inclusive,
kcII had obtained Judgment against Charles ..
Phillips IN ISIS. and IN 1863 he had the property
sold under execution and bonght It In Iu 1866,
nnttug blackwell 10 possession OF tho property,
claiming to be the tenant ot C. T. Burton, aud
finding The. apparent adverse tttle OF record in
1,us1on he aruught an action Of ejcctment against
nlackTel14 as tenant, and Burton. as claimant
serscd the declaration On Blackwell and obtained
Judgment by default. on the 81 OF September,
1896 The last day before the expiration Of two
.e:rs after th2t time, that IS, Oh the aday nf Sep
temtcr, 1865, motion WIS made, In the name Of
char'cs P. r1Fton 10 set asnle the jadg
nent b deiaa't on On the ground tnat
hy tile attldayt of Charles H. Phillips. AN urler
vas male. Of cnlns the julgncnt- Theraunon
the plaintiff entered motion to Eet aside that
nT7!rr on the ground thnt it Was obtained by
truad.
;. IN The cour: of the Investigation OF the facts
It IVES Developed, as the plaintiff believes tha!
there II no su.h person as Z. I. DIrtol- Letters
wcrc found pHrporting fo have been written By
Iurton, In which he represented himself to te i
resident of California, Owl ming property In vine
4ar'1s to the extent Of about half 4 million OF dol.
lars- These letters were written and dated at
Iast 10 set asisic the Judgment rs ,lrlauL test!-
fits That 1t1rtnn had not been n the Stateof Illinois
s:rcc l,fa- This discrepancy led to an fnrcs:tea-
ior,i,a: members ot CONGRESS, ata nj H. ;he sarerin
tcnt.nt Of the Agricultural Department
q The STATE. tes.ns that there was no such
%n ncSTns s % 70 h,r,c. s <t n {" !, 'ass 'ss
State Of C'lif.rnt, ,ls he WIS represented ~ Ills
letters to be-. The testimony ri experts WINS also
nliEtf', a.ll these were unanimous IN tcstll'lng
10 the te!fef that ff!c LETTERS putp0rtiu8 to h1ye
iecn written f'y burton In 1s6l. III Chicago, Herc
III the kame handwriting as other letters which
" we're tientincsl as having besa written ~ rha
Eutton. or VII" represented f:, time u lave IL
gate and to prre that there Is III was such man.
stating that II sucn man could not he found and
Identified The order settling astlr the Judgment,
having heen obtained by fraud. would be sci
aside anu tie judgment reinstated-
Godfrey snulacker Ct Ct A. ~. :. nautel ". Baker,
Euleltus $, A'sro and Charles E. Dix. On verdict
George Boomer =. Norwich Fire Insurance
Company. IN verdict ror sa.:s7.W.
Samuel Ffnlay r. John Hearnes. On verdict for
Samuel Myers s: as =. Theodore Stacy anl ".
:, John Sanders e q : Philip Il, Decker aaa Il.
IN CnASCERT.
!, Mary Eoonan =. Michael John Soouan ct nj.
Decree Of kae ipa1ttsion} for cash Of lots lp1 102
lo:, 1C4, 1": 1'f :l'nl 1n Lannon's subdivision oi
Block B. Canal Trustees subdivision OF Section 49,
%, H. Thr value Of the lots as appraised by the
Commissioners Is sG1a per lot, excepting tic COR
ner !ot Coll estimated to be worth 500. The de-
be bid.
Louis jacob si1bar r. Rachel slIpar. Decree Of
divorce, under bill filed on the oth day OF .aprll
last, ami here 1herc wns personal service. The
parties were married in January, 1863, and The de-
cree Epec'ael desert1on. charge OF adultery,
made IN the 'El'' being E ersSsa sSc1s
Marcus c. 1saacs =. Peter Er1I. TrtSpasa
Damares laid II ~. co. win eapsat IN ait. Hhln-
dued him In his office and best him.
Frank sturgcs Ct MS f. '. uenry Sherman. At
tachrent as against IN ahacondtng debtor. In
tieltcdness stated at &, ,43LCG
Frederick y: Mnmhn ct als tI1amll1, Green i
EoA '. Asahcl Pierce, Assumpsit. Damages,
Hannah N. Peabody =. Gustav Fischer and
Kooest Ntt. Rsplevin Of a one and one hnil-s.orJ
name house, M 1a5 Dearborn street, two-story
and basement hTlc1 house in rear Of the same, and
onc-stoTy frame IN re2l Of It.
Horace = 11eharl r. James II. Keller. Aasump
William Roberts :. Patrick Mulvn. sIande,, It
charging (as Ia alleged under aathl plaintiff With
stealing COW. Damages laid at St,oVo.
lilTam NirsAu q n)Av. Alfred IL Aaumeter and
Ezra Metmorc, Of hankakee+ Assuzupsit Dam
Joseph r Robinson r. George II. Miner, George
| Y. smith ap,l Joseph u. Monart,. AasumPsit
Mari \: CTrnlcy anil husband =. cl,y. Case
Damages laid at sin,coe.
ANOTHER PANTY FKun
People, ETC. ex rel Robert Davis Eae.as cor
| The selator st:tcs that h" w1s married In May o.
1861, in this cs, 10 one Eicnor Jackson, and ths
thefr vas issue Of the marriage the boy James
Eow Of the aHe OF about eicvcn months lie tired
Creeping hease> With his wife nutil the 5th daY 0
| Apr1 last when the woman len hts home AID r.
10 the hes o. ns5 iae sas
from hts residence, anil their child She now r
ftsseR to return or nllo the father to hsve auEh
Do wh The infant or esea e enss iss tae hoas
| never Fee or have the chilli lie has mad: fri
qEert applications, has alwaEs been refused ans
TT IT, ns r door shnt in hs fsse lie a1so sAsSe
has rot in single Instance spek
s.cn cnss wosd 10 her, having a!ways; IN ~, be
| :'it comfortable home for bath wttc and chill,
| lie h2s tft1, siice marriage. done. lie stncs fdl
1t M f5a ek e
taat the wife Is about to sease the city for IN
purpose of rrrlovins the f,abe, ns he believes, t
iae caanss of rs grsat satFcri1s a1d rcIaSrs los
toly Of the child.
| RKAl Esf11E
Eben Cnlfax v. John J. Gillespie ct al. Hit
forectcse a trust deed covering Lot q, II.
Stones Subdivision Of Block 81: Canal Trustee
Subdivision Of the southeast quarter OF Section
! -, IL.
Petition of benjamin S. Campbell, guardian
Margaret DAWSON and othcrs This Is q re,stt
10 sell real estate Of the wards, at the dscrrt1t
| Of the Court
Orcn Sherman =. Margaret F, Merritt ct ais
/ titlon 10 enforce mechanics lien Of $50 on hou
! and lots and OF Lot 8, Block ], G. ". Lay, Jf
subdivision Of Block IL, Canal Trustees SUBJ
! vision Of Section s., 70, II.
Ia F1tAMBo1sE DOVER.
. Thirteen other suits for dover were eoMmenc
! In behalf Of Mrs Theresc Ii FrAmbo!se. The
4 suits a1ect the following realty:
: Lots :, ., chnd I, Block !, tossitts second a
.Aeien N north half OF east half, southeast aa'
c " q Section T. 80, H.
t Lo;s T. ~ II, ta, - g. 81. q, a, %s, H. 81,
d - 4e md &c, block Z, Davis Addition, In E:
+ Aal'' southeast quarter, Section IL, ss, ls'
II County Court.
Estatc Of Victor CHARLES McCarthy In Il
o caEe tne question wAs As to the custody of I
chud os The deceased ana lie nsntate Of {
= VIII It Eas ordered that tue chtid be CO
y tn4tted to the custody Of The luothcr" and Il
the will be admitted 10 protsate +
c VIII provided lesta1ncntsry gu2rdIans Al
u the order Was entered tho widow asked An nnn
>, a. 10 the order admitting The Nl to probate II
Le Was allowed. T1creupon It was moved that II,
=, much ~ the appeal does not E12y proeeedIupa
J. custody be given 70 the testamcntnlJ Vnarnisl
The Court refused to grant this motluu. On
d ground, n1st, that the parties named hsd not q
g lied and secondly, becausa N Tho exercise Of
to' Gstson be thnnRht the child should be lctr to
"a 1e.st. ~ N.sHts: ~.,r,.n xrtr ,,,o,.s .