, 1869-06-05
THE co1a1s OF LAW AID EQUITY.
tinted Etnfrx fNr~u4t f.on-

A&AA 44AuAy n OClVSk.
THE coBR1s Of LAW AID EQaIrY.
Cnlted States CircuIt Coat1,
The tTtal OF the cause Of Richard Greop + VII
Eond, yes1eriay.- '~1'4
Chilled Stases District Consr.
roTEe or an 1xruR7IT1 psctsroS.
Pr: ras &c Y. Propeller 1runsidea This wa.
a'iH fle3 t'y cornrla1n1nts coal and wood dcaiers
OF Chicago 10. supplies (coa iaruisheC TO he mo.
tse eos S,. ., .dsa 1Se being
OF the vessel, the owner and MASTER being wftnout
MONEY here Or credit in the market on the sotn
es5 t o. ~ Nay ~ lss tae owner q The vessel Dwight
ted States District conrt Of the Northern District
Of Ohio, and on the 1Ft day OF June he vas n1
@ @!aised = s9 ~ b M sans1qrt Tbs propeller was
being then IN possession and under the control OF
tne aafsnA OF thc Ohio Court as messenger uu-
az ne proceedings In bankruptcy III being
in possession 70 The exclusion Of nbeuanta The
propeller was released IN Tits court by stpuia.
tloa, at Which time no assssnes IN bank-
the case tends 10 show that the Ohio karsbaI had
Possession tndel ~atsat from the Court, but the
as, m.s1enee y w 70 Be dtaxn that he claimed the
The Cout decided The nrst question which
a-ose-wh.ch wls, what w2s the pnsItinn ri rnn
Marshal from Ohio with reference 70 the p1opei-
4et Was tne propeller not liable 10 SEIZURE Uy
r-Ason of ltS being In the custody Of the law Tne
sEF5eEe CouTt Of The United States has dec1Itd
tsat Were vessel ia u the custody OF an oc1cer
G1ocE psotess frnnl State Court 1t Is not liable to
seizure, even N the case Of a reKulas masttinc
l!en OF subject to the Jurisdiction OF the AduralrY
OF a1srF. S14's'1
In ArSaing this subject he spokc OF the condt-
.ien o. toe property Of the bankrupt pending the
ap9 oi ,ne Of ,t,,,a sss aef tne
q voluntary p5oeeedtns there no Ps Psortses sss
a1e 1or the control and disposition Of the estate
Tha tae deed Of assignment Il made. There the
warrant 70 the Marshal, AZ messenger, but h the
loE1n o. the warrant no provision Is made and bT
u No authority y gtten to take possession OF The
oanHIpt1 akseA Ihe assignment however he
ist*S oask 70 Tie moment Of Ming the petition In
authorizes tae taking d the goods for sa;e-leep
through this difference waa probably to be an-
counted 1or b. tic belief that tae bankrupt haytnr
e tsaasren ~ r. igh5sPe1ty 70 III ess,l!ters 70
snbtect to The order Il the Court, untu thc as.
sRnee should be appointed. Be this as IL may.
11e ne ~ 1 haTea ~ no provision IN this regard
lne loa0 did. hon ever, believe that, upon a
ptopef case nade II VAS competent for the Copst
20 otlef tae property to be taken In charge, pnd.
n7ota.,. u taia ease such a. order had been msde,
4e non-lsatlllt5 of . vessel held Under the law
MouaQ pFeval here: but here It would seen, ib.i
thr Marshal oi Tho took possession ON a. II"
owner GUILD hnvc danet II there had bfcn no ma.
cesC!ng pending tn bankruptcy
~ beng 80, VAS It the Intention CT the Bank
!aps liN to diyest aud dissolve Lens ao3 nruf,es-I
lEsS % eafuIce IN n1mitalty iten+ The f,ourt
thnnsht not Dy the bankrupt lav all r,fs.c mn,
Gess o. aitachnen nt on the property II The a:tach-
ment WIS Ende within fcpT mocths text prece,t,nc
zee cctntnencet.1cot Of proceedings In bautruo;-
cy Is dissolved This does not include maTittne
hee : s1as ma:ttne ~ Acn 1 fnch ~ ,aa owner can
stt, to 1t until the claim 10 tualIY sat!sfed mn
yt,t,1 ~ that The llea Is cuforcel under The
rules o1 i an !, ''mt5a:'s couIt The psoprrty is
Tnc % hca extsss as' &c thing indcpendeat q
process In ,ne case OF Il. HtsaehEent the attach
nent itsen creates the lien Foceed!ags IN
bank1uEseJ would not d;vest the yea 0! mort
on ~ The law interiors with az ,,d 70 nsSa
Us WSa.s.s ne9 s5eerss ,1 esch Is ". sccca5 Eaed
tns 70 ia@ tn =. ,es 70 be easoFeea aoeo1
- 1I!s esins sa''ss g tas Wnea sssas ean9f an9
ihe MGsi Gso1c:lr decide a. 70 the existence OF
1s,1ea9I aItne ne,1 District Sou IN Bankruptcy Or lie
HoulS S y law. has Jurisdiction to ascertain and
,iqEldaie lisnt md other srectnc claims upon The
pePs tne cSy+ q - ,ns nppt' b.: Il woal seem tia.
hafe teen reenlaEiy commenced, mud where tae
sSse can T:oeeed 70 proof, hearing and decree, Is
nen Is this II a Gauge thou,d 20 70 The plsir1c:
Court OF Ohio, IN hkr Gaze question uirht fsiri,
es se ~ 70 ,St tas , yaai; Of sae lien Then rond
tan Ills iac lsnee /. ns, NIKE oe0 n@,ef 70 asee Il
collateral ISSUE. Tnduubteil, Sh.Sc %
he'e s,.te Mere rfosesd'nss F:oset commenced i
Gas Claimed, It oulu l'c proper for the Court in
ganklapteJ 10 alow tne suit Ia The sta:c Court to
proceed y oftef that It should be sseestalned
cry Endes nc State lAF. So here tae Court Il
hn1aptft Would be Enided BY the adjudication
luHaes proceedings Of tho aas!cncc accordingly.
u The Court In bankruptcy 81 Ohiu hai asuail;
n1en possession ii might bo iopropes Tor tnfs
Coa 1 os, 70 ,n1srfes. sat thss not being oae rbe
The 1leos existing 1t tie uue Of the I,,t1g Of ,be
Nuuon: aud that such liens ean oe enforced. Ii
s ,Se sn. 70 'e'eaa 'ns property rom the charge Of
xxr sE17a.
Andrew Bennett ct al Y. Steam Tug Preston
Mtat1ey- Collision
In Bankruptcy.
orte.ition to DsaeAa79e-charles c. Blaleslee, OF
Observation-Disclosures E. Whitney. OF Dnruer's
Gtore. pu PnSe County.
EnsitIsd to AI4'lyfer Di.eA4-gs- -cn.rlcs D. Wat
Hns, sHns Of s{esmose, % De Kaio County; Edwin B.
:, Is.eAs,2ea Preston, o, WOODSTOCK,
AeuenrJ County.
q lasa,le: Charles u, Watkins, OF sJcamore- Dc.
halb County.
Superior Coa.t.
Conrad Smith r. CathAI1ne Weber. Decree 10
selofm deed Of part Of eoushsas: quarter Of Sec
CossreI Z. Greene '. Samuel L uluexey e,
al Decree Of foreclosure md sale Of an nnd-
v1ded third Itefeft In water lots 81 and ~ north
OF The piers IN hinzics Addition. -
JCmNEEE.
Nathan E Plast and Edwin Thorn =. George
Glasshsook. By confession for u, 1,esaol
Joseph SchNerzels y seholu Goldschu,tt Case
damages iald n 81 coo, with eapias Ia aid Paaln-
" y tailor wo9tanx II cnttef and ur1nx At No
2Ga Chicago Rtcunc. lie charges that defendant
WrpnG1oIy canSed hla Arrest on chx.Er of the lar
ce1J OF thirty ooats AMI about fotsJ pairs Of pa1sss
Caunsy Cezrt-
1befe WIS no season OF this cpuft yestet.1ay.
departed tt1s Lie On Tn1fBday cvtuint lssf
Recnrder'a Court
Se1fse J. Robinson r. William Robinson. Decree
o. diro7ce for adultery. The parties were ruar-
r1ed on the eoth Of January tast 1t appea-r3 tha,
the husband Waa delinquent with one kate Grccn
on the Last day Of NAY
rIFOhcE AEEIp-e1AHs1sa rtsy
NAT E Rlakely '. Robert n HlaSe,r. Pro-
cco1lng fof diTosce, The complainant 6tA..s that
xne Ka1 married to dtfeudan: on The spth day OF
MATCH, 16d9 In This city, and she ALLEGES thai Ahe
na4 heafy ever koe been treated Wits cruelty,
exercised *lioout Frot ocAtiol, II Is specifically
9AAa toAt on the 1hir1 Of May be ktactsctl her II
the side OF The bead with ! Knife. md 1e.t oon
6ru1ted her with his Est1 e~N @*'a