The Van Buren press., 1869-11-16

night, are
CIVIL CASES.
United States VS.. Alfred b. Greedwooa as
admir-. Of Hobbs debt jury trial; Judgment
for plaintiff for 50 1905
Peet Sims 4 Co. vs.. John Turner-tlismiss-
ed for want Of prosecution at plaintiffs cost
U. s. VS.. IIansel Males. David Moore. SAM
uel c. Ilowell-yerdict for plaintiff for 1000.
T. Y. Brooke, assignee Of Humcs 4 llamil-
ton, VS.. Str. Fort Smth--dismissed ut libel
lants cost.
Ii. Il. Dibler Il Co. VS.. Quail 4 Moore-as-
sumpset; dismissed ut plaintiffs cost for waut
OF prosecutions.
U. S. VS.. George Huffman and William
Scott-sci. III forfeiture Of rccognizance set
aside and cause dismissed.
us. vs. Curtis, Crowder and Lce-contin-
ued ut defendants cost
u. S. VS.. Crawford, Donnelley and Wasson
dismissed as to Crawford Judgment against
Donnelley and Wasson for want of recognz-
ance.
Bancroft g. Co. VS.. Smith & Pierce-contin-
ued by consent of parties.
u. VS.. s.Rowland--et. al, continued on mo-
tion of Dist, Attorney.
u. s. vs.. 2kegs whisky. 2 horses, . sets har-
ness and wagon, pro operty of John Quinton
default and decree of condemnation.
u. ). VS.. boxes oftobacce, elc--dciault and
decree of condemnation.
u. S. vs.. 2o7 lbs tobacco, cic--default and
decree of condemnation.
u. S. ys.i barrel of whiskcy, etc--default
and decree Of condemnation.
L. s. VS. 2 horses. ambulance. etc, proper
ty Of Lewis kcys--dciault and decree of CON
demnation.
u. S. VS.. mule. saddle, etc--default and
decree of condemnation.
u. s. VS.. horses mules. etc, property of F.
a. DeWolf& Co.--di.missed BY order Attor-
ney General.
Aathony Hall ys, Mckee & CO. Judgment
for plaintiff for S2.27S,29.
Traber & Aubrey vs. Mckee & Co.-judg-
ment for plaintiff for $900,72,
Brownell Il Adams VS. Mckee & Co-judg-
ment for plaintiff for $4,000 debt and Sll5,22
damages.
Milner, Track & Ripley VS.. II, f. Mckee &
Co-judgment FOR plaintiff for S2,5OSsO.
Buckley, Sheldon & Co vs.. ii. +. Mckee
judgment for plaintiff for $4,000.
CRIMINAL CASES.
II. s. VS.. Sannrl Garvin forfeiture Of re-
cognizancc motion to set forfeiture aside.
U.S.vs. William Davs--forfciture frecog-
nizance.
U. $. VS.. Buck Brady larceny; jury trial F.;
verdict not guilty.
u. S VS.. Grafton Gardner--introdncing
goods into Indian country without license
forfeiture ofrecogni1ancc.
Us VS. C. L. Introducing liquor
into the Indian Country--continucd
u. ). VS. David B. Cotton--assault with an
intent to kill; jury trial; verdict not guilty
us. VS.. Robert Best and Samuel Lee--cor-
ruplly influencing Il witness Jury trial ver-
diet guilty. motion iiedsin arrest of judg-
ment
u, s. VS. S. Evans introducing spirituous
liquor into Indian country continued by con-
sent. ...
us. VS.. j. +. Ray and J. Is. Rife-nolle
proseQui cptered.
us. VS.. George Burke--mail robbery jury
trial verdict not guilty,
u. 3. VS.. Larkin II. Blake--pcrjury con-
tinued on motion of defendant.
U. S.vs. Samuel Dorkns--larcsny jury tri-
al; not guilty.
We notice quite an array OF talent
among the lawyers in attendance: VIM.
Walker, Duval, Humphreys, Glass, Fish
back, Cabell Rogers, of Fort Smith. j.
ID. Walker, Reagan, Pcttigrew, Judge
Ham, Huckelberry, Of Fayetteville. Jes-
sc Turner, Thomson, Wilcox, Brown,
Robinson, Young, of Van Buren,.
We also noticed several distinguished
looking gentlemen in black coats and
slick hats (vulgarly speaking stovc-pipe)
that we did not recognize. Taking all in
all, We are pleased with the complexion
of the u. S. Court at this term.