, 1869-11-27
THE CuvRTS.
Damages Awarded Against the
r. M. c. A.
New Suits-Real Estate Business
Judgments
The Police Conrts
l'NlTFD STATES Clr.CC1T COURT,

The Police Conrts
NSlTEn STATES ClRCCIT COURT
TIE Law OF BcunNG-7HE KxTEsr OF 4 norss-
BUILDERS QARIliIY.
John C. Rue =. Young Mems CnHkttan Associa-
ton CAsc. To recover foF building crushed
by The falling Of The east val! Of the cid FasEeI
Hall during the nte which deAtto ed that building
IN 1HuusU, 1853 On the p1rt OF deleudautA
other exrtHs tarch!'ecIs) t-stlned, Rsing opinions
OF the kutuciency Of The walls Of the old FaEWeu
Hall, and the cause coming again to the plaintiff.
guestion arose Al to the pToprtety Of certAo ln-
1srrugstortes, 10 what extent he coui1 proceed to
an investigator facts songht to be couuorested
by tho testimony Of defendant The Court
held that the rule in Eurh case u tina: when, in
maktrG OIL lrin.a N,rie fact. On the part Of the
Slainl,c, rAseF1al 70 the lsue. evidence IS Intro
<.uctd about hcn The rla,uud thtnks that there
Is no eescus controversy, and 1t trtns OCT that the
defendant auswe1s H. anu IN aucn cAte4 the p2lu.
n1 T. tsSen sone shst b5 snIpssse. ihs EVIDENCE
thbk IN such case Us th4. It would be the OTIS
-c1etion at the Court TO aslo the patut1n 70
hts own proof, on lhe ground ol surprise. But
1hc1e It y distinctly understood Inst
uYon ,as ve point tesaops ases'*a se, p0pns
int1o,uced or the d+seotsnt, the asaec, Of the
Gaze AZ Presented os the plaintiff ia Claimed to be
]
thlhG the platbti1 Is oodtf to uate out ht+ case
IN the hrst instance, and the court cannot permit
llm 10 gu over 1t agaia- .....
lion Some of the w-1is fe!nR lAid during tho
w,n,cr, ere tne n1lcSs wet or DRY shen tney
were laid: One u,tn.s ~ th-n testified that during
.h~ t5ucze,t Of the structure be 1requeatly saw
ht:cKs tax from piles wtItrr the Hu0< bad accn-
mulAted upon them. aad taken up Into The build
The Court Instructed the jury taf,er having sta.
ted tho c.FcuHntaI cs OF the ca-et thA: the claim
H. I1xnN
constructed. The craRatng Of the nistnrt1s build
icR WouEi rnt hsve occurred Tns quality Of tho
r. a tns for
ness OF ahout twenty inches, and the ea>t wall
trum few feet above The Level OF thr loor Of tue
hrcE, ss +, u cai.ed II 11nx The tuner surface Of
Inc vat. te1o< hat the w4lt xa+ Constructed OF
COO mon hr1cE- The wall was Of abou. the height
Tue Dirt po'pt WAS 10 looE to the nature and
character 0! tdE sttllchrt IT. object Acd the Kind
aud the loot that WA placed up II Il Was the
building properly constitute T.. mee1!ts purpose:
+ vas The dat: o. IN. oefennaot. III ,uattuctius
its Ouil1lpG to a ate the walls OF proper thickness
antl 81! IT.p'r mat-sai-. pripetY put together, 10
acct mp!ish the purposs It had IL v1e~ III tue eric
t:outf the ftt-cture It hue But thc def-ndAat
the operation Ut all .Itt -urdiuaty causes that
night he h1ounhi ag 4asl II 10 impair or to destroy
y, bit oily fur tie purpose OF withdrawing
those oIdiLas. csrsts wh'ca might operate agairst
II, having ID view the p ,ro0se Ann character Of
,ns bno9s a,1n 1ste A. 70 tas
under the law. The oeElgetce, 10 tins case,
would be that the building vas constructed 10
accomplish Its puErte, In such a way reason
Abc MD prn0eht man valid aud ought not to
construct y; Lepaaetce oetnR The dong Of some
1hrR which q reas7ba o,e 1sn wooM mt do; or tue
oMtttlI4 to do sol oie:hfu2 which q Reasonable
nan would not omIt to do. The Coars,
however, could not fas, a. mstteI
la,Idtrg uas o1nnh 10 eon .t,ucl it 10 such way
thzt the walls u oul tot 1a:f ~ntu rts s1ou.d
occur. All he could taF ws@ teat, n a matter OF
Law. rerson cons Euc' nR nu'l.ilnS IS ,ood to
coLsttnct II ~ rrus+ut and Reasonable man
~ocld construct II. Win n ference 10 the chasac-
Ter and u.3ec, OF the nui.ng nader the cFp in,
responsibility did not deuc.h upon tue facl
whetter ssee1 profile eohs9as ed tnsls nulliug,
IL in,udac.aa.Iy s'' nna t ps0's wa ~
no. 3uttncsston Of wis defendant 4
e%n1s ou. ss &c o ss hot ea eeoa se sss
tet hintrtf uLder thr peueral sruog Bur, II tnt
.ittendunts' pn1~r1. wnul' have neeu de,'ro5e.
without tne sreDcy nl ttCisget C OF The defend
antAsn the cops Faction M IT. building, thcu, aI*o
the plasuun could not r+.cnyer. lur the dAnax
in in,* case, Of The eon.tr-caoa Of lat: building
Defendants we're found gaii'y, and damages al
sessed II = $50.
The Crtted States eK ri u Simeon F. PeEsy G
al6- =. The Hoard Of supere'soEA Of Winnensg
of .nandnmus to ne directed 10 hrsenhAuss to con-
pei The htr,Ratinn Of re-ollrion recooatderinR 4
order for the levy aud cnll+ct ou OF tar to i1l
date Judgments on roedA of The 10 IN OF R0cktps
ttsucd to the 1iactue Mssstsfppt lssi.rcad Coz
psBy.
sntnps!t letuand, st.,Us.
Mary C. Kontrta Y. Ge,rRe ". Chamberlain. al
sumps.t l'etr tnt s2s',Ur Tar nregrd areach 6
p10M!se 0f marriage, With special damages lat
1er money borrowed under pr mise
Same :. Same Ass"Mn-it Demsad, s., 400. T
recover the hutu alleged 10 hare been l'ancd
AdellA J. Gilman =. Henry H., Mary. an
Charity W. Lopg. Blu for n deed Of the Wef
aefrs % % ans G o,tn .ad oi + II 1ss e scs1 nall q n
west nnli o. the nor.hEest quarter Of Section q
eighty acres, being the rast hair Of the nor1s
Eest lrurltr o. lou p: also. nifty acres. hel1
the nnr1h end nj the ca.t hall OF the so1tnca'
quarter Of Sectioe =. Nil IN Township I8 noEtt
csro Gssts-. u. 9u+s 5 ID a n.ostapscy of ssmat
b. Llnrk, !. bucktt CHAM It'd Albert StnfGeA DE
10 tss S1se ne ~ /, - 81 tas , n,oSr1s q
business, leading III which, + u alleged, he dea
with deiet.'ianrS, bis banAert. In the course g
their negotiations II IL SAL tn1t CIark 10 suduc
sturr.s So1s to a4lran e him money, agTced NV
Them tina he ~oul6 rsy thsm n7t nnly the pElE
cfpal of tnc tans .o.ucd, to1etocr WITH 10 pc
cent itte1es, oa' such Inrther sum or Sums c
opeJ rs thes thna!i exact a.n etq1tra him
rsy. Such further suns, It IA said, amounted
nvhf, which x-rr tr.nst+ rrrsl 10 tue Nauonh II Pal
Fhnk ioy vs1ne- II II now ssnRht TO ftcars
Dp0u these Lotea. 0a the RfouDa lhAt tneF fepf1
ttEfet rn p8Tt or pr 1.i OF the moQeY4 loAue
hF S:urEcs Sops, or Of the legal Interest wntt
hsn accrued ar ~hs to sccEue upon loans, b
CONSISTED OF pfauI.ts aun undertakings on IT
part ol clark pay 80 mn money orar nj
aboye the amount nf ipsp. AL ! tat-re1t inerros
rs a further consider 4tiuu for HlaElng The loan
wherefore tcey eete n.urtus
IN BANktrrtrr,
IfstharqAt--Jnlu- H-tbtc cr, " Dunton. Coo
County: Micl Z. F..1ce. OF Cortland, ucka
County.
1iJjsd'eati"n-A Allen u. Smith and Charles
C0.e. OF C.icaSn tnfn'untarf proceeding, tus
tIted by II UP t;rtdDst 4 ca
rtnrr1r sOcnT.
ASSAULT AND EA11E9Y.
Thomas ElaneroeKv Joseph Limb. Ttcsps
fran assaL!.. damages lad at fl,oo. Th's IL
action fur Iii n-raul; ntd natter! alirged 10 oa
bcen cong itsed on the Iain'tn ou tuc evening
fhc e.1th tuetant. at Poem ~. IN Portland lsIoc
was il IL ns TScn xss
ta.tt vi nt1-sI tie p!&iLtIu ssst lhat the d-rcu
ant sirpck bin u hand, no,p nnset
Ing III = wea,~ n, caused "a. tLxl In no. In
the sca.p Of rsainun ! head wre5e 1t nasasri
desired TO throw hin OIL. OF tue wtnho :, At t
s4uc imc saInc, "iii ma>n you have It
In. ycu" rI.ip'tn AAIe he did not asaA 1T feter
ant. ststcr be'Gfc or after the wrong d.lc 10 hi
THE AnTEslAS WELL
Alien c. Stor. =. Jtktpn n N,s>er. A c. Dsdz,
Frye. snn ii:,ly i. Hro~s- information lor
cu" ndrran:a- Thts u m apottcatsou 70 cont
tic respotdehts to show y what antao.tts u
pans. An Illegal ELECTION is - M. II he'ns cnafS
tnaf 1hr cefrtef defentart ACT a. d.Iecsors Nttho
suthontF Of law. not belrg duly qasltord a.
G1ircd bJ the Charter Of the corp 1Ation- II
EaHer ct the posse s.ipn OF thia property has b.
In controversy In tue United o1ases C1rc1ls Cor
tC9 urwAIuB III Two years
CRIMINAL bCS1hESS.
SuAuord aEd McKen, Indicted for murder
Erorartr ntnr'.ols, caus lno court, were 4
rxlKnca TO plead, tssh they were not guilty., n
wefr Tenhudeo for tr1gl
Jrr1MENTs
Mary Mcintosh UYEla A. Dayia. For 1891
tehallea II. Adams v. GeorIe A. CnamherA.
f16e IS
Mercantile Insurance Company =. Johu T. III
tor For $2-<tsA
Charles Z Waleus e1 al :. Thomas c, Tao.r
Ecu. For {ss3 a5
fKE ECITN.