, 1869-08-07
BISHOP VS.. RECTOR,
Preparations for Carrying the
Case to the Supreme
Court.
Answers TO the Amended aud Sup
Elemental Glli.
The Bishops, the Courts, mud
tl,c T'rrArnscr'h Answers.


:.ll..I9a c: TIC CatG,. ,ase 10. lie sa.
pa t.;:.t;, e Is,S:c >ssG iast- TIE aEs."t, ts
i. -, ;,,tc. So; i:!"a w. III ct l.a7. M,.
ts.5 ;;;i ....ss.I IL 1ies 1hl.,EE .cE:er,!as, w:
/: . :-.i+ 7'1 et'7.s = :, T..::!ai.
g.. ;.t; 'tsilnr: ~ NEa.
sac ',t'S.'r, '.'.*'t = t,,.+' % *. S"l-',e
w u, .',.rs.si IT, Z IT, i: E$$s Il t.; lid
J." .,:;ss:," -, r.. b. X; ,s ,A."1 r., 4;
ttf,, '',tr5, i + nv, x."a sttu":, iir,,
:. :. !, ''F' 1 a@ &; t. T.. IL ;;" II 1 g. :,
i =. ,.-,.;, .s..; AL st-r,I1. j., l.Ia.-
=, ':a,T.. NJ A.;ie";sf:l: az, i'nssf 4 *
!: ~7,. ,sl":y h,"rs h'h iht,.ill,'rr,'rs 1htnEN
l.;.,-:;.h 1.'7>tr!s Ar"s!'sl 1hA. N. caan,.'n.
e, ":r M m a,sa'''' ,!s nd 1sM a1aA!a! M !.
H.; as "i.;; i4s- 1"T hEli raln,t hA,e lnr:t Nc
IVA. ,!-r t;l!';r i1:eI ii -! l:i "a rfAtIn
H. s...yr A!v.:!apc ai t':r dual hearth: a. II st
ID; ,r,.4Grrrl IL ral I'LL. ltT nnA~rT l!rEron,
srin "a 1tl~t. ati e,, tatts lhsF'hf A5 he u u1
,!,,t Is n!a!rti1s 10 LIN 10 HlAle ansHrr GAtn,
n. Il Is i Ifrl!IIrr nl 1ht l1u1,-staht E;laropll
;Tct, ..!,I srrInr q! ihr parish ri thr1-I thHtrh
Il. E:!e.s1: tHat kt receives .slaF5 mud has Inc
,st tT !: r.r,"r. tEa1 the said Ia!lsh II Cl.rist
aEr,,!. tla> commandments aAI y CONGREGATION,
s.tsas scna.t snh cnurt:. edEce Ut q T',dt and
.a:tlr atatt.l II! tkc llll AMI tlta! ne complainant
v Is e,,tlrat. s, for tbs npstFy of the Protestant
fI.s.nyl! 'AErch. aud taat l ha5 beth $ frts''t.
tr nuh rector for The ZINE sIaltd In the l'l hf
so:;'4 ,nt hs r. enrS, nl1a n,ss9a ~
iie complainant are ,nyoivrd. 70 any
extent OF !-crafa','e fnlurE,. IN hli he
.u,s..y lu 1hr contrary hr Ayers that the talents
I'D ezltcut!ou q The complainant VAL f1 him for
TIE rlrsu,i of other a*ncatlons wnsch may &c ni
r1rxtr. rrecun,a1y proat; nor Will he necessarily
ie c1cj4.lct FROM III equally pruntssEe pursuit. Of
tic ministerial r7nicsa,on- And while 1nis re-
Erron!tnt claims ihst the commission Issued y
hin. 10 tle p.esentprs 70 Investigate any alleged
terEcr atI 70 E.Ate r!eseattnctt thereof. II sum
Glen: cause existed = not necessary part Of the
r.ceenss o. as.orE e c9nsf ou SouseaeI e M M
nG:.. yci for tie purpo.c Of this answer, he al.
ulte that he issueal commission to
Rev. Iuchard +. sxtet u. D., and to the Hon.
Lzcus B. O.!s, rhlrh l. set out and attached to
tie b!t As an e1hls1; thereto. I'D he Also admits
tAAt setting under the author II Of =ald commission,
, I,-rsr1tn:.ut Was r%turned to him. true copy
ii phicA is Tied Slth the hi! OF complaint. And
he 2'so sdn,tss that Citation, COPE OF Whlch y
We:e delivered 10 The complainant by the Rev. Mr.
E.owles CT the ai-t Of June. ie'i9, and tht5 re-
sts1Eccnt owns th2f such c1tatlon was lttenNea 20
give notice to the complainant OF the time and
risce Elch the respondent had liked upon Tor his
i-,a! uu,Itr the pteseptment aforesaid. anu also,
ne 5ns ,a 81 CTnon " oa witch th
complainant might select clrneI !hfec or Eve per
eoIs n ove.seers for the trisl of the acc1scL
h,s tesionarn. .s.i ~ suti th cornatcsnt In,,.@i
ists, . cog Of which is attached 10 me aHcnatl
blil u exhibit No : And he aatnlts tna. u r.
SSlttnyoTM ~ !nr ~ -, 70 ~ ~ snh u Tt-an E,rn va
LIZ ~, ~ ~, tt o1n ot lTne ts.5j n cnny a!
palI!lE uac W LIZ 80 ,ut ~ 49, ,rot ~ n-rott ana
WHICH - nie4 ~ ah iatf.- S,ted I,,lr isso A
ee,,r ~ ~ 11nc6 ~ 1ed xtb The bill And this re
FpoIdent herewith nles, Us pat OF his aoswe:,n
a :! Tptae in y i1,cer rrfelrt to IL the COMM.
picaiion Of the respondent TO hcssth Fultr aEd
49, = hst ,ptth tHn comniainanT in fis own hnlIeI
j.upe ,nc Bitnop Iec,tes Ill that norton VI its
aa1eavit 1led with the answer OF lhe members Of
n"hcd jnfr osS whtch rel0tes OF refers 10 SD IN.
.aTtev ~1
aro This resnondenr. further Answering. AYERS
,n h u ne ,h dseSsrpe Of his du1 as Dtshop Of iii
n1ss h he aid con1ene lie Sanding Committee Of
ihc ajIcese. snd such committee met On the 6th
- nv I,st Cnd Ihr rotnnlainaut having hereto.
Ia.c T;t1ci ~ clecI the aseEsos from The Isl Q!
r-rxh.ts1a fUvntshrd n him the StandInV com.
ttte IN duty hound selected f5o saa l, 1t n.n ine
ttct 51cv' Ju1n HcEson Rev. II. n. Pierce,
n 4 md thr Try. A ", Sutder acting Ior the
sid eoup,sinapt under Canon xX,aod at the same
s,1na nnnntnie ~ the REV E Chnse D. D. 10 pfe-
sI,t. M iudce, in case The contingency couieu-
nls:ed 81 Tie "a sectlon OF Canon w should
t3.rc1y
11H thfa RESPONDENT AYERS that arter
saca selection and organization was made,
lnd cnmnr:cn, eourt. accoFdi,1s 10 inc isT Of tac
caurcn Gu ' VIII Viii %anshatls, u II the neeahel Che
fgh h.I n 1etnn "a 1he resbnnent aI,
!. became the duty Of the respondent to lay before
The asEessor1, when !ney anol1u conEene aud Or
faniEc, me 1reseltntnt A1olesaa1.
hn me resnonoe VIZ c f 49,; sa
ihe major nart OF the vcstry ot Christ Church had
nnf Ctyrn nm Information that The complainant
was cui.;v Of "o-cnce or misconduct. IS for which
10 ~ i,ahie m 5e fr1a1. and he ndnits t1at he
ntt nnt rrresre auch tnIorruattou from
,Sree nrrshyrcrs of the DIOCESE cpiltled 10
e1 the Iui tha, the rcsnouieut had not as Dlsnoo
~ .uv ~ ~ ,nere r.o,n nitn n,mhr ~ cnntr
rIs;cd IN s.ction :. Canon XxylI. pf the General
~ Tns 0ty ar undef imnnta;Ion of
is.pc y1illtV. Of offence Of misconduct. as ntorc-
saa' t,n tic contraTs, he uycIs thai heinEe be Is.
Foed the commission 10 the pEesenssza the charge
reperate' and "rrgeneratet'' IN the i,aptls1nal
s1ytcr ~ iufa.,s tlf become rub,lc, not OILY Ia
Inc parish q CHRIST cnr5ch; hut, also, throughout
reference in The .lsIly secular newspaper press
fa,1d he hn,! rerssyef forUaion from s:,cn palllc
rumoT: bn: ,lis respondent c.alsns tna. Il was
r.-.rc II hi, office 10 nrocec n.,ust aaT rrtstF-
Ter Or clergyman IL. violation or the canons and
rules CT the Church. Or other offence. whenever he
ssrt,,J v1.rrrrc credible tHfrulsttonT' that m
6~.nr. had Len rnInmt,,ci and n1e AUTHORITY
o,S ,,r IN ms ri IRE anecfcaliy rtcornlzeiI
~. ~ 1,I1s' .. ~ EayenT ENetton i which rcads NJ
tu,,aH.. = oA ~ NN -
,1n,.rr ,h,u ,e .nrnsh,c IA. oaraec. eon.
EI,ird IL lin. to lie H.lp and II thrr tt Bltlop,
Ia liz ttraeAi member II the STANDING Committee II tt'
titr" IN which !r il canonieany 1cedent 1t the time
t:,he ch..re."
anu tnis leSltohuett nttih tttt. nttUtu.us ~ lnE
1Hshnr las an inherent po"cr especially indicated
IN his vkItnF1H1 functions 10 Inspect tho bthaflhf
M n; Clergy ana 70 eare nsm 10 os ] ="
nraning Of the canoDs OF the Church, nn'l that IN
addition 10 such inherent and general power, II
Is uaIc Tic duty Of the respondent rs
~ VI fNn NN