Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-10-18
Criminal Court---Iudue Hudson.

Criminal CcuFl---4uulB H1uSOh.
The following cases are set for trial dur
ing the week:
80 State vs. Thomas Prewitt, murder.
20 State vs. Angelo Marie, murder.
40 State W C.. l.. Morrison, perjury.
~ State " A. II. Curtin, murder.
"A State vs. William GTeen, larceny,
As State vs. Pat Callahan, larceny.
~ State Us ChaS. Levy, malicious shoot
ing.
81 State vs. Aleck Hunt, larceny.
81 State vs. 4. i. Leonard, forgery.
10 State vs. Arthur Cartwright, murder.
G3 State vs. S. ShueSter, ct al, LARCENY.
"a State vs. \. II. Curtin, larceny.
10 State vs. John McMahon ct al. larceny
It's State vs. John Fontaine, larceny.
81 State W Samuel Dickens, maliciOu:
shooting.
II State VS. Charles Reid and Arthur Me
Entyre, houSebreaking.
% State vs. $. Ogden, bribery.
"A State vs. Ed. Ferguson, larceny.
IS State vs. Henry Wilson, murder.
rs State VS. L. Marshall, bribery.
II State VS. l.. ID. Vincent, bribery.
rs State VS. l.. ID. Vincent, bribery.
10 StGte vs. r. \. Rennar, bribery.
50 State VS. Sarah Gainor, malicious shoot
ing.
81 state VS. r. NJ. johnson, murder.
So State VS. r. NJ. johnson, malicious
50 state vs. K. NJ. johnson, malicious
shooting.
81 State VI Peter Goode and Taylol
Ssarke, murder.
s. State VS. 7. +. Leonard, forgery, etc.
50 State vs. r. j.. Leonard, forgery, etc.
81 State vs. 4. +. Leonard, forgery. etc.
s. State vs. Thomas and Samuel Dickens
murder.
Of state VS. Forrest Powell, maliciou:
shooting.
IOl state vs. Charles Marshall, malicious
shooting.
I02 State vs. Thomas Jefferson, false pre-
fences.
IOd State v i. NJ. Dickinson, embezzle
ment.
TO- State ~ Adelins Nicely, perjury.
los State vs. Martha Dawsey, perjury.
liz State Va Moses Hopkins, perjury.
jurors and witnesses summoned mus
be in attendance promptly, or forfeituret
will be taken against them.
On yesterday Court adjourned out of re
spact TO the memories of the late 5. =. An
dersoh and ]. Z. Matthews, members o
the bar.
The resolutions passed at a meeting o
the Memphis bar, in regard 10 the deatl
OF ). ). Anderson, ESD were p%resentet
to the Court 10y b. y. Hart, Esq, an,
those in reference to J. T.. Matthews, Esq.
by Aforementioned Horrigan.
On Monday the calendar of cases here
tofore published will be taken up FOL
trial. The Clerk requests that all misgis
trates having the papers in cases returna
BILE 10 the present term o. Court, will sent
up such papers Immediately.
Law Court Ige Lee.
Yesterday wa motion day. The usuR
business was transacted.
In the case OF SOuthworth ct a: vs.
Hesse, Levy 4 Co, the jury found a yer
diet for the plaintiffs for Sj23 -.
The eases set for trial On Monday are:
2255-Flack & Co. Vs. Bloss.
22j7-Halie vs.. Martin.
225S-Evans vs.. Coolidge ct al.
22i9-Taylor ct al. VS.. Lanier ct Al.
226l-Swayne vs.. Winters ct al.
2262-Rosenthal W.. Pfannesteihl.
Z2G3-Cochran Il Co. Va. Holland.
2164-ThOrnton vs.. Satfarans.
22j5-Germania Blk. Co. vs.. Mount.
2266-WiiSon VS.. Quinn ct nj.
2269-M. o. IL. Co. vs.. Hardin.
2g7O-Same vs.. Elder.
227l-Smith ct al. vs.. Lawrence, Duncan
& Co.
2272-Dancey ct al. vs.. Folkes. Ext.
2573-lst Nat. Blk. VS.. Mickier ct al.
2274-Wimbeast VS.. Welsh.
2275-Lindaner et'al. vs.. Taylor.
227G-Wolcott, Smith a Co. vs.. Coleman
ct al.
2277-Coye vs.. Flynn.
227s-Mariey vs.. kellogg.
2Z79-Iustice & Co. VS.. Petit ct al.
22S0-Byerly VS.. Shutter, Sup't.