, 1869-10-23


ATTACHMENT FOR CONTENT.
An a a,,ssh!asat =; @ ls:usd assns! 5a:oe s . Franz,
p;y vtin = order oi he couTt that be na1e e,
estate. Ffapz. upder an orssr OF + tue M Couft
IL srr1nsef i Foxa Addition. waersupon one
Josiah Il. El.se, me Iarty .ho procures ;he land.
highest and best bidder, bas that Franz has
neglected 10 nuke report OF the sale.
7oo,,, c,o, 1gnG4xsGs W%l+1s f., n, ro-,.,s,o,
for taso.
The state Savings Institution =. William Ktuse-
t:saoa
plEckcE Arr1ixp FOR
Mav AcMahon '. Joan acMonan- Bt1 nled
pfa9atg Tor dtsoree, on the ground OF cruelty.
s.h day Of DcceGner: 1851, md that sasy lived
Assrxrsrr.
Lawrence BeardaleJ :. E. y. Cole. AssuDpstt.
Demand, 200.
srrEI,tOR COURT.
,rnc.v~-.
+. MaAer T. spaidt. For Eol.'2
Stepaea T. VI ooe u lleinaa "aSesuan- to-
Htas L. E'draes :. Western nasuc Sponge
eon Psnsi Wa,san f.. =, al. ,o,, II 7no,, r..
"a A1a" l. atson e As y soao Il. 4aofa- ZOE
Gso'se Gardner ct = :: same. F.. sos.
Sosl S a,na. s Ct a. :. - ssme. Ee, For sd'as1
II1.n. '. eTI 1Ts.,.- ~ ro,,, p,,a- r..
esS9sS, g1sS, c, r,r.s ot a, ,o,, f.,,-,, rn-
stet "a q uie@ - ~ v 'onA ~A'''A' e'f
.'s ka.:oa Fs.z*r ct al '. Walter $. rurlous: For
1ns1!ss + 9ntana ~ g = as T. Acsoan 1e5Ae* b5
| ,,.,, 1,,us mipsw Hiusl1a -.
rars.. ~ - nonn s,,,n3 Tna ,',r ssa;
T. eaa:s I'D AZ = assasa apea IL l i s.
esse. Thc petition alleges that me petitioner =
ne WIDOW o. Hfram = MGAafphv, Wao dle'l ~
IL dne lorm Of law, November q, 1867. Cader this,
Will sic Wal deS.ee. it does not state Of n 1t
sur1o>s oi pe1sonnal aa nEd ssa1 2 pao2sIsy =,
7ts c'i,t o. the 10th q Masco: lsae: within
al s.m MO 10 e to- zen seneat 81 he plos9'oas
I:s sse1'on: sns. f. she eecte ~, to
s.sons her aoKes O. legal ehsrs o. tae i esta:s .!
VT 1uspeAs- 41u eue S.Att4s sass ~ sus .t
Ins, Nse: q ss~xs ~ = sestsin !aads Us! -
;, :. au - rnS 9snaanfn ~ r an1 n
sho q en,S 70
LEN . " -. Ss.s =" 'ae 7Hu aeAs
ao1s o. a1is ets.e. ..,- ~ ,.- h,,
tund's 5 r;oplty ysrJ acnonl,na % tue existence
tr n0h existence OF Will Itae eetsle NnAt y
called an nv ,n'estatS esta1' tea = 1aets mas 1een
20 &H, Anu. a. III tnA cAe. tae1e
ee no children b. the marriage or
descendants Of chtldfep. n1ttef the +6ta aectlon
u e:1su Of ii sae real estate aosa,u.ey. IN iee
ahd all the pcssoGa plofst1S aitet tne pa5mcnt oi
debts. and b construction o. law, under sereral
c7lled aeI specire AWARD.
- ~ r. 7 not u tos stc9,o1 a. eaas = a. e.
sse ,,s dne. 1ne ni c.,c ~ tne
stalte 81 Wis noes uot epseE VEG Sase ptopt145
tninS II doesn't . shot. i,
,,M - a N11i 7, 'G - tina enh. ahe hi; =
tcuounced the eenen9 o. N! Hl5i onf y ~ bGeI
ecc1dei ~ eese!A eAses1nS !s.n .luno1, !: q
sea asso HAZE, n Id oe. y ae ot tas
est*e-snst. Atnooka "tou" tsnoe TT .ss aa,s, .ns "
tt!ii SIC oots CO.. saAe ~ ns!I, out tae esIe
not governed, therefore, By the statnte Of wills
which 'slases Il, o1g 70 ess (, ssss ~
: IL the tenth section Of taAt efhsute II !
: provided As fo1lows: "EEery dev1ee Of land
far her dower 10 land,+ Of ner aaa.e ii pctton,
! e.taie. rnless otEc1K1lc EXPRESSED IN the VIII
tut ane may elees Ehcsns5 ans "1 ~, t3se sasn
. tie henent Of such der.tc o. oeHoett. and tak,
: EeF ooRtf N tnc !aoas, aug aes sna1e II sac per
TIs IS ,he statute lnaer which She has aeses
:. IN n nocuc!nE The be1cnts ppder Inc VIII, an
when snt EenouEee snat rennts nef 70 csftasl
Ii,pers, xhesac1 there we're MI Or no.
coua tas nc saIe ftg3ts as u there naa been u
Ard in this case IT has been ve,y tr,rcs:a:s
, question 10 determine, having ftao1nced the vi
and what she wss entitled ~.
| !. II the persohsl property. aside f1om th
I sFefCC nTlfu. aA1,
n g OF the real estate. ~ ......
The question ~ to the personal pFnpe!s
| hns ntrrn,if been deemed IN tn
] e0Se that / have referred to Of Nc
Murphy r. Beylcs- In that case ittts Is the sas1
. caac we haye befofr u, but re.atng only 10 Pc:
+ | toha1 property, lie widow claimed she EAs eat
{ tied 10 ali The personal prpperJ atter the 7at
Is rpecf Of debts In Other weF.is, II Was elaine
fuoesAnstAi!. Ns" ~ aas tsao.1t*u ..E :" :. !.
tuC tk&Akt o<H1G% ~ aa*Eakfe SstAk5 AfA suAA ~
T. nnoutt oi her cain 70 tae petAonA proper!
e VAS The same - would hare teen had It rtse
l8 | been tes-nfe tstate. The result OF which wous
u X thsi haTtnK Hht TO csA!In all the person.
= lsprer1J when khe feaouueed tne *tl she =
It cood a. resokeo Inc ~ o. the husband A1sef ne
eeAth, md cut on AL nts le$31et9 nsil
from the wife. The Supreme Court veE
properly held At IL events tne reasoning Is el
ctt1lipEly cleAr. that the widow hAs no suc
rEhsA and hJ consideration OF ~ the atstutt
| fntF CDue to the CONCLUSION abe was entitled