, 1869-06-16
EUROPE.
Further Debate in the House
of Lords on the Irish
Church Bill,
The Bishops Generally Oppose the
Passage Of The Measure.
4 Threatening Lttttr from John Bright.
Gfent AF4tutn.

N<4~sS ~Vx"IACAS1'
creor Fsr.tatn. |
~. ,u,er, <.- ~ -, n,r
~" ,na-, '"A no1o0 VI
|
,,,,. x1or.o a, 1n,,, .o.n,,t,. wss+ nrn,s,-
n, 1.+,.,o-s sr.n.t ,hs ,,.,..rn or,,s ~, chr-n,
mi -. nreernt~d
Io,d T.,t,1s 1.ys r,,t., =, or,s,,o, ~ n,..
80 ,.h. -o-sn1,.,. ,n,.nssd - .nse..~ -.
an,a.a.. .,n,.,rs4 =, ~ n-s,,., ,s.,ss - ~
pt--.se.,. go. w.ss,r1
-. +ass.a-.. 49,. ~. 49,, .
aS ~. asa~asst.a. -. a,.y IN eaa
-. .@ ss.s" -. s. - -" -
.@n. " A"437 A'Hss' 49, useo @ &'A.1 VI An!-
.o"n' " oseso1o!as. ~ n.oon ~ Poespoo"ue1s
~ s1sa y, lns * ~, msu Msas tSsait
8no1'o .. W eA.'e. " - ~ pasoo. - uu1s ~
~ ~. ~ 44sa1a VI 1o4's ""
,. aaa' 49, 49, .sa -, -. 49,. 49,. -.
10y -. 49, ,-aona.Iesuv ~ :. 49, =, tha I'm ns :,
,s aoa - ...s--,sa... e.. ~. ~ =. 49, $1,000. ~ -
=, 0 80. -s-s .,,.rcs.fn, ~ w. oTr r,o,,sn. ~
E,-,s so,-, h.<o - -n+r~ras, -a-.,..,
~ ,,o-s as,,cctton.h1s rorrn H. u+1sa rarst','
..+tan - ~ ~ snaa.dnerts ~ -, ~, ,,naI,..
-.,I. 80 a-so..a .hs r....a ~ sss. -
.s,,h a,1.,.r 49, ~, ,aeo-. st1". ~
.u a,m.inn"..s 49,. -" n1 saS ~
~ peop.s ~ . - s '. HV.A
'noae' "n4sA AeP'o7en'Sa sAs 1ose opa1oa
q tac na'loa.
lao Aleao1uop u Duona ~. eomp1aneo OF tus
nanl, unRene1uua anu "loc9a! nanaef iu ~nlcn
1ya ,ho,on, ~ ~ -. ,ac.e,s-. - r.i,e, ~.
49,, 1asa s"-a.a '' - AA1s"' "a'e
oeen 'ess ee'efe-
me b!shop Of 81 bss'ds SID the superior sano-
-! " .as p'oPe.'y ~ W. " u1 eous!ue'eu' out
Inc oesf means 10 apply IN view Of the public
neeo. lie Unsupported o. 1ae excessive DEMON
ssta1lehs Of tToteetanusm, and e1sd ne salaed It's
asccnaanc, not as 1t aaA POLITICAL md religious,
out ae II was nofaL nc considered the Irish
church an ANOMALY. II haa !Ailed to fuinl its mis-
BOD, and promoted dlseoFd. He urged the passage
OF ING Dill 70 a seeona seaaihs' and Afterwards the
1atlooucuon oI Amenu'nehA-
me uuke o. n.cataona @ e1pasnea 'ha1' tnongh
ne 'eit tae lnJasaee o1 Inc o!' alsef erea1 ncsa-
1'ou' nc ~" tesoseu ~ ~ IL oPpos1ton 70 als
pa11.. ne "as eenslo!e oi Tue lne3pculency Of
popular aea'Suoh' ann as convinced tnat tae con-
stI"1!on14 coo!ee WIS u pass INC oul1 NteE
aneao1uB tae oolectonao'e etaasea' Aao lea'e Inc
responasnill95 Of accepting the amendments or
Sithdra"ln2 me Dill on toe government
INC bisnop 0! Petefoofongo opposed the Dill.
he appealed TO The House 10 act firmly and In
partially, and not hunlllafc themselves By abd!-
eating abttetiy toei constitutional position, be-
seecnlng tue nAnhn 70 spare them because they
Tcre utterly contemplate mud useless
Speeches were also made against the bill By
Lords CheIn6tofd Aad Caan11cafde, and IL faE0r OF
Ii bJ Lords Penscancc, Dc Grey and Aonck.
Tho House, after protracted debate, Ct !
O'CLOCK again Adjourned *1taoot acnon.
1Hs tRisn cnuHcu h1t1 CONSIDERED CERTAIN OF
rAssAGk IN TIE aorsK OF LoRpa
LONDON, June Is
The 7imfi In An article On last nights debate
in tho House Of Lords, says the speeches Of Lord
stratford dc Radcliffe and the Archbishop Of Can
te1buE, leave no DOUBT u TO The result Of the BILL
While they dislike It and arc unsble 10 persuade
themselves that It will haze beneficial effect,
thcy advise the House to give !ts assent. The
practical good sense md patriotism OF taese
speeches contrast strongly NTH tone OF Mr
Brtghts haktf enus1on.
The TtIec1prh saSs, after the drst nights debate
On the Irish Church bill, the lssue cannot be
doubted
The Star thinks that since the speech Of the
Archbishop Of Canterbury everything appears In
mellatcly favorable to the passagc Of the bill.
LETTER PRo4 JoHN BRIGHT.
Mr. Bright has written letter to 4 meeting In
birmingham. In which he aa5s: "1f the House Of
Aofus delaJ INC passage Of the lE1ah Church bill
They EH stimulate the discussion Of subject
which might sunncr for Jcars Tho value Of a
constitution, which gives majority In one house