The Republican journal., 1869-01-28

tl, ATE Ud visit her when Bray counting her
Vcvcr todhor was incapable of being father. Can't
, whether am not. No recollection OF telling any
,ne so Never wanted to call her boy by my Have
,t thc Masonic pin with me- Lett it at home because
Il, testified about Masonry. Took it out OF my bosom
u court on that day Had orders to take it out. De
i,e ia say who ordered me rCourt here intertered,
-ayiu5 there was TOO much time expended breast
..A Have letters She wrote me while in navy they
y be in court. long examination followed relative
1 letters and meetings in the woods
JONES Cunningham testified that Angie told nm she
nd TO get divorced from Bray and marry dy S SGe0F''
cross examined. Been II Colcords Tor Il fortnight
WIS, Coieord mother defendant testified TO visit of
+ua the house In January and to the transactions
ratile to the unIsouiHg Sc She told her to go away
.,heu first came Knew Of her sons sickness, and
Amssa C5lcord, brother Of defendant, testified l to the
'ut herself from the sleigh. Defendant made known to
u his sickness and where he got it, Heard my brother
a her about it, She said it must be canker, and did
l,,t DENY that he had been intimate with her.
d. Hopkins Searspor testified that he treated Col
.o7l tor gonorrhea, in 1857 three or four weeks Mrs
Tray opped 10 me Tor medicine She described her case,
III asked her Ii she had had connection with a
sr5u diseased. This in May, before Colcord appli
d IA July Furnished her with medicine sometimes nsed
55s.-examned. Gave her tncturo OF iron. 1t is used
- disorders not a reproachul nature. Iron might
.lre gonorrhea in a chronic state
haord Noodlnan testified 10 the alleged taking OF
9on by Angie She appeared be dying at first but
B being put the sleigh, sat up anG appeared WELL Saw
stain the iuid She took on the cushion 1t seemed
cross.examined. My wife dead, was sister of
.Ue % cords.
rhe defence here put in the following from Angie to
uicord, written while She was the wife OF Bray
Tuesday. June s. 1866
EuEND SAMUEL-Will you meet me next Saturday
ouing at halt past O'clock. wish to talk with you,
l1d ain oath 10 give you up. Come without fail.
Your sincere friend, ANGIE,
TESTIMONY IOR PLAINTIFF RESUMED.
Rich called. On the night Hollis CoIcord ties
th to meeting, returned with me, and stayed all
night with me. Hollis Colcord was at the meeting and
went home with my sister HI waited at the house till
ge came. They moved entirely that day. was there
Mr. ana Mrs. Bowen passed the night III the Porter house
Mr Bowen, recalled testified that he commenced
moving i'll the morning completed moving the same day
ind stopped in the Porter house the same night with his
whole family except Angie, who went away with Mrs
Rich. Testified TO finding on the lounge, the Masonic
uu thai &C cord in court The lounge got out OF
repoiT he fixing it, and found the PIN Saw Angie
give IT 10 him when ne came to the mouse next time
Asked Coleord what the G meant II said the wearers
were officers ~ the Lodge
Crosse Examined Fixed the lounge shortly after the
yth Of June. Gave the pin to Angie next morning.
CANT say whether have talked OF this since my testi-
MIS- Bowen testified in corroboration the moving
gier. he Masonic pin was found as late as Septem-
er Angie took it and in my presence gave ii back to i'm.
Dr. Hopkins examined by Court the disorder that
would be communicated by contact A long examn.
l9a NV Mr.. jewett followed concerning the disorder
nd its nature
Angie Bray plaintiff re called testified that she stayed
Uh Mrs Rich on the night OF the moving. Was not at
the Porter house that nig0t, Hollis Cocords testimony
regard to connection with is wholly untrue. SO
Samuel Coicords story SO r as relates to times pre-
7ious my marriage. Received the Masonic pin from
fatlcr and gsya Cocord myself / know that Col
eord Is ihcaape o. oeeohhg la9lli H. ne IS MOI
9ss in trouble. and asked If it was possible had any
49, b ld ~ .1, 49, M "uste
wrote him twice once through thc Post Office When
% 9a i m g ia 'Va Il m . sah4ei ~ IL m'
@1d mat ne was cured ne never referred 10 the mai
again never wrote the note that has been read.
5 nyd 433II,nd NV +ast;t2;od No. IL a;Ian-. "
'ao andtaIked' as teStlhed' about ms cSness.
Cross examined. My husband carried me home, and
"a 49,. IN h . III me ioie u an d. ~ Nv,
~ MN 10y ut l9" S ie pos'ea e 'i c pa
IN. -' - ~ "a NoGoio "1ls ioi nan. ooii
'e9 ~ utstoNc .efeiS tIl'e he oau'. " ithe5S ue
s'leu To answer ipfthef'
The testimony being all ont both sides, the argu-
,a,,+s ,yr,. nrae4ld wifi, 1, Mr. EnnnoIs for tho do
-, ~ -. -
u. ana '''h' NleNefSoH LOT 'he PE'hltm; occupying
49, hour ana hail each.
r.t, r,fAper
ne our s4l ln, outsa, ttk anu ihG alttnuaie Oh
1g Slouic o' INIT s i. mo- a a
seuuttlon Ut put io tle pre'cn u Il Gol
trat 10 ma me deIehdah Is MOI resPonsloie unless
mere was contrast Of 4rragf' lht Is the question
~ u a ieeu 1t5 - III th i nut
j" ny W. 4hletIcu ION "a t' ~ , i. le uei
dg 'i renGs nq lfnHs Hc en,e[ia ,,d Oh
'iao, ~ pS't,io. 49, , ~, y i; p p o i
iSy rom -gth i,O II IS u'H eerous 70 ~
ger promise 10 1,y rom AisIS 9ot'yi auang peqp,e
'r soela IAa Ptop1E 30 mo pendent OF marriage how
9ien S1 We flsli Al Wilat h9urs how lonsf Inc
ti'ia 54i' Il 'l'ea eonst.hty rom June 10 DeGcm-
"ei ing ueieh mt says ne visited very seldom Her
t4'AIs ostits 70 ga understanding OF narrla9e-hs 10
me contrary. Were preparations made f-how extern
no ltSilE u" thehl Is mere anything 10 cor
ula hef 10 snow that nc was regarded Us
'Gtule AuSo3Hi ana Son-lh-la"
t n' e u,eil i Dt.''ni. niaei s1'hnlng. incre
}llu l'e ofVH ~ contract without IT, But the case
lots hol resi- "hoy ON teSe She testlhes TO an ex-
ess 'sIeehieH ~ marriage ana day hNed ne moth'
tt ''tu ~ II tiis testimony ~ true lnefe
S Il eolItict tIu 80 lhSttuet you. Inc defe1aant
"a hound e fuh! IT. unless there are other good rea-
Jus 10. uSreSaTuihS H. ne testimony oil TINS contract
siI rom tl' ialht ana hef !tmlly save ING evidence
iitf"pee lle ueIIhuld claims tlat ts IS NOT en-
@ 80 ~ Gu. l-foee ) teat'lnoiy IS laet oy lne
S4ae thal IL destroys me theory OF secret engage
Wei'. nAt pre- the circumstances upon when the DC
ththt relleSs ne says ne never intended 10 marry inc
ite' q il'tHieu 10 Hthe lHIri@SG contf 'c
ma l t iiie teAlilHpHy tu't ne Ild - Il 4auTlcdtlon-
HlI t' nS 1itea 10 orce Icrch upon nm she sues MIN
ON MONIES VI IeIcnSe' oe talllS correspondence,
g-l On I.i part 2eloIG heI marriage me PROOF war
l's coc4ust0li tI'i sue WAS anxious 10 Drng ABOUT
Nuih !Sh IN sty5 SIG uecidreu heT intentions,
Wle so wa pray Wlle 10 set dVofce ana 10 marry
DoicoFu, II sic hIu 10 tflp hlll Dld she DO II And
Nat was hel purpose IN what she subsequently did,
An unmstakable evidence OF conspiracy is claimed to
e III Ie letter dated june 5, 1866, which invitation he
lid not accept She denies the letter, and it is impor
Ian for you determine that point, the letter
genuine, what does it mean2 Was it for an honest pur-
pose 1t is tor you to determine. There might have
zen Introduced testimony show that it not her
~ritng-thc evidence of those acquainted with it-but
nat was moi done If that is forged ii should tell in her
av0r-li genuine you will consider its importance.
Ihe defendant says in relation the alleged secret
M, e u Is pari Oh lAe conspiracy. II not
known it, And another Important and Interesting mat
ter Is the poisoning affair She took tegned to take
@ 49, i ' TX NJ II W., We te ts VI 'leI ar t 10
GU will consider all the circumstances her anpearunce
the stains ON the pillow and whether of Iauapum or
,ytetenrd water II louianum din If hova thn atfec
'''NN N'N ~ h'.S 'iiN sIiSee