The Portland daily press., 1869-11-18

NOVEMBER CIVIL TERM-GoDDARD j. PREsID-
ING.
WEDNEsDAY.-The Court came in and Judge
Goddard announced decisions in the following
cases, which had been tried before him with
out the intervention of jury:
1H-Levi 7. Coombs & al. vs. Stephen Fogg.
Decision for plaintiffs for 81 damages.
Asa z. Moore-Haskell. Vinton.
128-Levi 7. Coombs & al VS.. Stephen Fogg
& al. Decision in favor of Fogg, one of de-
PENDANTS. Decision for plaintiffs VS.. Jordan,
for So damages.
Asa P. MOore-Haskel Vinton.
S5-Charles 7. Green vs. Inhabitants North
Yarmouth. Decision for plaintiff for $1O4. g.
Haskell. Davis & Drummond.
1s2-Thos. E. Twtchell vs. E. P. Conner g.
al; Decision for plaintiff for $lss37.
I: b. Reed. Putnam.
Decision for defendant for return of furniture
and 81 damages.
Williams. Vintop.
96-Llewellyn D. Lothrop vs. Alopao S. Da-
Wis o 8 al Decision for plaintiff for $l7sN.
2S6-Wiliam H. Turner vs. Howard P. Wig
gin Decision for plaintiff for $25 damages
Howard & Cleaves. Putnam.
&-Chas. PaysOn vs. American Steam and
Gas Pipe Company. Decisions for plaintiff
for $612N.
Clifford. Davis & Drummond,
assam. s. & G. P. Co. VS.. Chas. Payson.
DECISION for defendant.
Clifford. Davis & Drummond
202-Am. S. & G. P. Co. VS.. Ocean ms Co.
Clifford. Davis & Drummond.
D4-Am. s. & G. P. Co. VS.. G. C. Chapman.
Decision for defendant
Clifford. Davis & Drummond.
92-Wm. f. Mayberry VS.. Charles Walker.
1cision for plaintiff for $12S2.
25s~Edward Newman & al vs.. N. S. Gard
inn Toll for la,,
Shepley & Strout Merrill.
156-Woodbridge G. Osborne Vs. Job T. San
ford & ais. Decision for defendants.
Emery. Waterman.
OILS. Decision for plaintiffs for $279 go.
Thomas, Jr. Bradbury & Bradbury.
The new docket was called and large num-
Der of cases were disposed Of Various motions
were acted upon. The Court then proceeded
to the trial of such cases as are to come before
the Judge.
No. 94-George w. Rich & al. vs. Frederick
Reed & ais. Assumpsit to recover $3S "a for
goods furnished one of the crew of schooner
Kingfisher of Southport, on the verbal order of
the ships husband. The defence is that the
husband of the vessel was limited to contract
for not more than IS. Decision reserved.
bennett & bennett T.B. Reed.
The following assignments of justice actions
have been made by the Court:
FRIDAY, NOV. 49,
83-Randall VS.. Clark
90-Smith We. Smith.
102-W hitney VS.. Strout.
106-Hoyt VS.. Mark.
126-Merrl VS.. Phinney
133-Mitchell VS.. Hanson
135-Eq. L. Ins. Co. VS.. Emery & Tr.
140-Johnson VS.. Hoff
147-Stuart vs.. Libby.
15O-Chase VS.. McQuade.
209-Brooks vs.. Foley.
206-HannafOrd VS.. Hannaford.
239-Same VS.. Same & al.
SATURDAY, NOV. 20.
124-Flannigan vs. Kelley.
181-Sheridan & al VS.. Cameron.
188-Wiswell VS.. Deering & ais.
197-Woodmau VS.. Burnham & ais.
198-CrOnvarth VS.. Pars.
199-Jones VS.. Mclaughlin & al.
272-Tincker vs.. Cook & TT.
273-Mattocks, assignee, VS.. Kilgore.
MONDAY, NOV %.
2A-Goding vs. Crook & Tr.
225-Hill We. Jones & al
232-Parker VS.. Lombard & Tr
235-Lowell VS.. Parker.
2N-Met. Life ms Co. vs. Twombly.
26l-KDight vs. Murray.
262-Sawyer & al. vs.. Daily.
264-Audrews VS.. Marrett.
266-Lbbv, comp't, VS.. Libby.
268-Whittemore & ais " Lovejoy.
269-Mattocks, assignee, vs. Benner.