, 1869-05-27

thst laezn u = iarRs amount Of properly, Of which
The WE !, ~ saas 1na ~ 1as o. sasaa fa tnas
Judgment against the husband 1t appeass fhat
Inc rt,ie to nte lots Of land upon which nve tenr-
Ment houses hare from time to time been erected.
is II The name Of The wife. The fluids for the pas
cEh1e Of tie los and for the butk,tncs belonged
70 fAt1 OF were the result Of the }o!nt earnings
:! T., ainsen ND vile. and. IN ixv: bis properly;
m Intelligence ntnce, anI the n.oueys received
from T. with the t,nehandH earnings, have gone
;oto n 2 pFopettJ IN controversy. x.z prasi aiao
we're derived rom non, BY Rnt. Aside EEoE
this pronerts Pratt has Interest IN none- Is lao
.p. H. s p1s a;1 the psGp55y a1
the debt WIS contracted upon which tho Judgment
Na rendered
taking Nit 1rnfn her husband under these cirrun-
Stances. When be Il not nade3:td, can ao.l the
property against credltoEs seeking ID sake 1t for
dehtA subsequently contracted 49,.
The Court slmItteu the right Of the husband 70
make gifts 70 his x1tc and advances 10 hts chill
dren when he u not Indebted Snch ghts could
Fight 70 11axe suitable md REASONABLE provision
for the wife out Of accumulauon1 which are
not nee.ied . ior ne payment ,n o. debt sna,
In anticipation Of going Into bu8:ness IN order 70
make provision for hts wife, invest his vile With
ns NJ m tae et e. q oss @ r. n ges
the property In other words, & ne cannot l1olo.
1rniiy disposc Ut his property, although he y not
se q Il. sna q tho T sx nus
t,Ees into loAA, tur, to hts credlto1a And Say,
have no property: It belongs 70 ny vile" IN snis
saos @ an IN ,ntenno1 on The ps1s Of Frstt % cheat
hts creditors at the the time he made this dspost.
linn oI hts ca1ninEx some doahe, however, Ia
OF proceeding for yea1s-placin3 his earnings IN
tho hands Of hts wife to invcst IN her na1sc-
Even un,ier the sratute Of 1851 the earn
Land Where. Then, The husband fol years adoaa
he rasSe q ~ tue rsSPesJ q r. Teta n, ~
hts wife. thus Gripping hiusen the Court thought
there was the warrant Of suspicion, and then only
rcasona1 provision for the wife would be sus.
tRtned. Such course kctua 10 imply m tnten-
ton to c1ver up, and the Court aouend wncther
any man having falr and honorable Intention
With respect to cselitorb existing or pTospee iFe,
would acs az, In this ease Pratt L snoSn TO have
LpLc. The present disposlnan Of the property
canuot be Sustained.
William Il JaTyi% anil Gabriel g. Farmer Y. Gus
ia, Fseher Tres,.ast Damages laid Al {, ~.
Cornelius MeGlnniss =. James T. Clas!ay. As
suInrsit damages: !',ooo.
westesn Ru4IUay Company. Case, Damages laid
Al SIaKH. This suIt IL brought 70 recorcr for per-
sonal injuries, alleged TO have been received %
declares Liza. rs she was upon Noble street, n
train Of the company came dpon her, threw her .
DISTANCE Of ai,oot thirty teet and severely ln1ored
aer@ II Is staied thai The speel Of The engine WAS
cnlawfp1, ard that no ElZnal Of the 1aius hp'
rrpach was given.
Adam seharer = Dennis Graham Asynz1psst
Gnien Hssss Manufacturing Company '. Ed
ward Il Lostn. aa1 Davis " kce3e- Assuups'E
% ren}sa,f T. Beetman ct ais ', Addison A. and
Ellis L. Turner. .AssE1p4It DAnageA: - 0oa
james u. Cutler ct u. '. Benjamin Wilder. As
W::lis,n Turns md iridset, n.s H.te, :. Eaxssa
McndBent Reuben 6lay1on and freicficE lnscon
Tr> spasA Eamacess laid Ut sio ooa
een,9. H!ss xssanpsit. anaaf Damages, 51.s1
snsGa Sa.on :. c.rlts c. Arserre- Case.
Damages lid !; s1o,aa.
1RkAcu OF FIal1SR
Maggie Crane '. Jacob AeanA Assumpsit
10 this ssit, which Is to recover for an alleged
| breach Of promise OF marriage, eapta1 issued
| chamber ma1dl IN the Trandt House, near ths
! Stock Iarsls, and she makes, under oath, state
ment OF ca.t, III sul,atauee ~ follows: lille aht
VAS employed Ut the hotel, ahout March Is, laiS
! Means became acquainted With her, and places,
! himself - much in her society tina: II hecan'
rnmore4 N ,ne house that hs sought hsT IN mar
| Alt.e7ER his clltms By preteHsfnns ~ hnnor,
| mutual covenant was madc early In Nav following
Seorus 1ster this tehe s~caEs,, Means atteiuptet
| to e1eicise toward her an imrronnetJ Of conduct
which She repuls2tl, bidding him TO 81 behave \
! feeame IN 8ccepte-l sultor, An1 npt as
| husband To this there Was Eifcn an eN
r:nnaiion that he had pecaI.as ideas OF the marta
cuut1act: he thought thai parties should not b
married unless they knew that they were mated
wherefore le Dlt-t Ike bankrupt as TO the masriag
contract unless shc recognized hls ideas Of colr
ship She hatIe him lcs1e her, bat he did not ST
rhHrEes that the soke nohths aller ApEit H. Is.
gave birth to child, Of which defendant Ia tn
father. Site nsso nlleges that he has, ever a!nc
she Cccet1td 10 his desires, refused 10 nazEy hc
I Ia frfffIDet4t OF his FTDtulye.
| RIAL ESTATE.
/. Adam Scharcr Y. Harriet Z. Dtcutt Petition
enforce mechanics lieu. stated NJ st1L79, on X
Is block 2, Latin + Smiths Subdivision " Bloc
| IS, Canal TIl4tees' Subdivision Of west half
Strttnn n, 50, II, and improvements Thc pEpI
trty Is on The east side Of frnstc avenue. bctwee
| Twenty -s4A I'll auI TRenty- ninth stlcet., south
tnr Hon,ish Catholic chulrh.
i EYust E. Crerln v. uayld H. Eeyea Bill 10 ay0
4 contract Of sale u land hy an ngcnt, md for
.i,llt- lalm deed releasing defendants claul to t,
| property under such cunttaEt The property u
: viewed Is Lot and south 2s feet ii Lat i
; 1llock 10. I.,1nan. I.arcetl r WooAbndges Sabd
vision o[ cast half northwest quarter md Aort
: wcs; quarter OF northeast quarter u section !
IS, II, Icing 15s feel front on Woodl2wu nyc-u
HIDE rark, by 9os Ieet- Conn lainant alleges III
! | be authorized safe Of the properly uTo1 tern
stated to White Brothers, but charges that Il
terms Of k2le do not conform to the instructor
! RolHs+ + Bradshaw +. John Lynch Ct a. Ejcl
, | rnent Tor the uulI, hlvd EaH VI the %eAt Iaf
the northeast quarter Of Section H. u.