The weekly clarion. [volume] (Jackson, Miss.) 1863-1882, 1869-04-08

people OF a portion Of thc Srat,.
government aud authority or an
States. only had the effect al m
commercial intercourse betgs. '.t
tants Of the sections 40 war. gE.
by the President Of the.r n.teI
proclamation Of tho 10Th al
made In pursuance % the actofet
proved the 18th Of July. I..f -f
nation Of April 10Th, 1901 c....
blockade. Of the parts Of thaI...
IN the States mentioned tltfs.s
terdict commercial intcrcuar..
citizens OF the States DOB rrba|I5..
Of the other states. That r-
was for a two-fold purpose
importatlons without the uarr
port duties, and secondly. ll H..-
surgent States from pr0lur.H..
carry on the war. This Wa. a..
out side fence for Tao rra SON. H..
partition OF "a cross fence lr.....
IN rebellion aud the other -..,.
put up until the proclamation.
Tie decd from Comp.a.ua.t l..
was executed in April I-.L s..
aud mortga lot of Mag.ls"I. t.
and for some time at.efWarH. b..
the United states, were tlH.m....
St. Lawrence % the Rio Grand.
graph communicated IuformI#...
Orleans TO Boston 800 ..ta.
then been made by che lH.t.I 81.
the commerce ana trade Upt. er..
OF the different State, thrr pH...
bellion, with those Wuu rsUs.
the Union. The rebellion NASH.
successful, the citizens Ui OBJ.
engaged iu DO, are rlupUuH .a
any act Of tile assumed Ura m
a defence 70 any agreem,uf0H
tered into with "A citizen oi UrI.
states, otherwise binding a.Ut.
rebellion been .ugDr-s I.1.
rule would have prevailed Ia
principles, BE- viii be rfpHI..t..
defence cannot Dee maIHum.#
30. There n mo cNIaaH.r U.#...
made iu Confederate IrUls... ...
thoriIed by complainant uH ....
er Mngc or Leuchmau uaH r.....
StructiOu or had ans p0Rr. &. .
notes iu any Sind % funds. T..
IL that the notes were Iu HEH.
complainant Doe Kentucky
cannot bee suppullsrH U.H..
at this time, would have .uH...
payment The complainant a...
zen Of Kentucky, engaged ...
side OF the war, aud DC De- N# ...
was az confident of thr failure
fedcratc cause, as NT N.u..#.
cess besides smith, before l.l.
him contracted 20 srIl IHuTr.#.
ing had the use of ltiUr ulrrf0H
twice the amount Doe UH.laUUf..
he sold. almost immeIIIr.F
Trustees OF "a charitable He.I.
twice the amouut they gave a....
kind Of funds. ~ Us NOT sGWuu
Point OF defence DO seIIgus'I W...
and others, when tHrl U#
smith, knew that the legal f...
crty had been convey a tUH.uI.
security for the payment ul ...
for thc purchase money. aHa H.
mode OF supposed payment audi.
by which thcuUtr- HrIu procure.
thc presumption from Ihe nE Nd.
they contracted Cor tUH UruUe.
supposed payment Wat made. ..
TIC ANNANIH "k H"'tA" N..
from Smith hi- Decd with Har.
The trustees only lc|I bond
made no payment ,N.eUt Dbl.
Confederate money NuNI ai.
through their financial Hgr.. s
manager TuasIale. tul. HumH
dated the transaction bHWs" "
smith. 10 make JhiF defence.
purchase money must hh. ..
the legal title received without
rights ofoomplaiuani, Or hH .a.
This mortgage deed Wa- au.1 81
the Office 81 the Probate tIUIhutI 4.
county, aud Wur uusAIIan,a .H "a.
ord showed, and was constructs
the world. 40 Go complainant ..I
RELY upon thc fact tuul tly Uu.
surrendered tU smith thrF mu
with knowledge ot tuC cIIWm
tending ID, aud which though
have been 80 Intended must Do.
as fraud upon Che rights of
Complainant ls entitled tH ..
Of the notes SO executed hN H
decree for 20 sale of the rIHu.
proceeds $40 far a- thrF may u.
applied 90 such payment