Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-06-02
LAW
~

MCN1cIPAL CoURT-Ce0. ". Vdlifaa,
Judqe.-The June term, criminal side,
convened yesterday, bat did not entertain
anv business. The Jurors for the erimi-
.nai side were discharged until Monday
morning. Court then Immediately took
up the civil docket and proceeded to call
the regular calendar. with the following
result, tO-wit I:
Thorpe vs. Yonkers New York Insurance
CO-mOtion for new trial sustained.
Briggs & Peterson vs. RObinson-mOtiQp
for new trial overruled.
Bond vs. Handley-mOtion for new a
overruled.
SommerviIle vs. Mayor and Aldermen of
Memphis-iudgmen for plai ntiff, $500.
Duncan vs. TOmeny-judgment for plain
tiff, S692 81.
Frech VS. Graves-judgment Tor plaintiff,
Bingham VS. Carlton-judgment for plain
tiff, Sill.
Selby rs Levy-judgment for plaintiff,
$40.
Calendar for to-day:
1882 Accommodation Bank W Gill.
I941 Golfer Us Sullivan.
1912 Baker vs. Sullivan.
1913 HALEY vs. Brown & ~
1914 Stovall vs. Happeek.
1916 Venable vs. Raga.
1916 Same rs ToOhig Ell al.
l947 Callen vs. TOOhig.
1913 Same Us Larkin.
1915 Venable vs. Jahnke & Warnke.
1850 Mayors Il Co. vs. M~cDOnOugh.
1851 Jackson, admir-, vs. Crawford, admir-.
1852 Martin vs. Hill.
1888 Kney vs. App ct al.
1884 BacigalupO Us Haynes.
1855 Sullivan VS. Kremer.
1856 Rocco VS. Sheridan.
1857 Fletcher vs. MussO.
1853 Polk W Lewis.
1859 Anderson vs. Seessel.
1861 Bradford & Co vs. Field e. al.
1862 Kimban Bros vs. Seidell.
1853 Douglas vs. Greenlaw.
1854 Bowman Us Cockrell.
1865 Warner vs. Goldsmith Ell al.
1866 Burr & Co vs. Brown, admir-.
1867 Frazier * Willett VS. Nolan.
1869 Murphy vs. Gallena ct al.
1919 Munford VS. GayOsO Manufacturing
Company,
Law COCRT-H. 8. Lee, Judge.-The
time and attention Of this o Yesterday
was devoted to the hearing of motions for
new trial. All motions on the docket of
this character were argued and deter
mined. The motion in the case OF Miller
IL Son W. Nahan was sustained, upon
condition that the plaintiffs pay all cost
up to date. All other motions Were-Oyer-
ruled. Court stands adjourned until
Thursday.
CIRCUIT CoURT-G. ". ReeUeS, Judge
The call of the criminal docket commenced
in this Court Yesterday. A large number
of misdemeanOr cases were stricken from
the docket. Only n case was tried by
Jury, to-wit: State VS. Sam Terry, indicted
for larceny. The trial was brought To a
close near the hour Of adjournment and
the case submitted. The jury in the ease
of Brown W Nicely, civil side,) returned
a verdict for plaintiff for $3.50 90. The
call of the criminal docket will continue
to-day.
L. s. CIRCUIT AMI DISTRICT COURTS
Justices ". n. SlrGUpe md @. r. Trigg pre-
SidiaG.-COnvened yesterday at ten
O'Clock, am.
In the Circuit Court, before Judge
Swavne, the case of Bradford vs. steamer
Morning Star, on appeal, was brought up
and argued, resulting in an atirmanee Of
the Judgment of the Court. Below the
other cases on appeal to this Court viii be
submitted on brief of counsel.
The trial of the case of Whalen vs.
Greenlaw, before Judge Trigg in the Dis
trict Court, was concluded yesterday and
the case given TO the jury, but no verdict
was rendered. Case No. 522, Vessel vs.
Lunsford, is set for 18th of June j. w.
Purviance appeared i'll Court and was
qualified as District Attorney on Monday
last.