New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1869-02-18
vovx DAILY TRIBUNE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 49, 1869.

eminent tax don't remember selling any under tne TAX,
hnol ., .r m hsrres OF sel OIL slid to Howe Whit
man correct then dealt in fusel Oil was In business
I'm January 1888 don't think swore before tne Conmis
sioner that was not in business In January 1863.
Tho Government then rested
Conpse for the defense moved have all the evidence
in relation to the conversation between Rollins ana Loeo
at Washington expunged from the record on ns ground
that It was Cd It's face entirely inadequate to De enter
tanned by the jury. .ts
The Court denied this application for the presenf,o
forna but said that would probably pass upon ~ IN
charging jury. Mr. L. j. Mccarthy OF counsei ior
the defense, then opened the for tie defense.
wiIett Ferguson. called by the defense, testified IN
January 1863 inspector, the same az TUG
defendant, McHenry my home is at Fort Plain mont-
gomery County; freq nenty at the headquarters NO
Der making distilery seizure with Mr. McHenry the
Nh 81 5a9I az No 1 s. saw Mr. Harand
Office and gentleman who was stranger 10 me az that
who was in the room with Harland aud he immediately
replied King Pike. Pike OF the Whisky Ring" iden-
tfy the witness Pike as the man VINO was III the room
with Harland tSensation in COURT
Tho Government made strong objections to the ques-
tons which elected this testimony but after argument
the testimony admitted
Witness resumed Saw Assistant District Attorney
Rollins December. about the McHenry case; had read
the evidence taken before the Commissioned IN news
these two men in Mr.. Harland's office it two days
after seized the dstiery, which was on tne Itn OF
door In the Chief-Cerk's ROOM had then known Nc
Henry for about three or four months; saw MN every
dissolved; mean 10 say that into the Office and
went by McHenry, who was standing BY the desk; !
the bonded warehouse book then ont and passed
MeHenry egain; SAIL no Is r Ina. sr rened as
have said now know that the saw in Harland's
office Pike; then went out about my Me- ar
land when went into the Office, was standing by table
the north slde the other gentleman was snuhs s
door; first saw MI Pike next, after that day. on Mon
day last man asked me on MSHenry nu wseH
came up the stairs Of this building Monday 9s saw
ae ,hSf y'iT recScsnizod as the man ~
Mr. Hariand's office; will tell the conversation had
had either made mistake had fqssly in sta Ia
ting that introduced him "a Charles Loeb ala not M
get sSnare with Maand; DID not tell MI E. B. Rollins
this, any other man.; am not engaged IN any p1s
parment; was up in the XVIIIth Congressional Dis
rct during the canvass; have got little money OF ss
George called By the defense testified thai
the s: , inc deSr , Tr In r. o that Of writ
could be read by looking through It, distance Oh
william II. Morgan and Archibald Hopkins gave SINH
lar testimony. 49,. .,s. d.
lands real estate agent Thomas j. Sheppard Ansell
Titus James Johnson Jesse c. Rowen, Henry d. Wander
X bs aSSVt sp SPohe finders pork
dealer Charles asny a liquor 6ea VINO Saa TIC
the good character of McIIenry.
Thomas Simons, Assistant District Attorney, was called
by the defense to testify as ITO the days when MeHehry
gave testimony in the Rollins case for the purpose OF
entertaining whether during that examination, Clarles
Loeb not In engaged In the Dstrlethttor-
neys office The witness said he believed Loeb was Inere
but did not remember that Loeb had any conversation
there with any other person than himself tine wlneSs
Witness had been asked by Mr.. Rollins Assistant DIG,
Attorney. to Mr. Loeb about the anidaYlts Q,
Mcenry made by the latter in the Rollins case ana ne
(yitness had done and had supervised to some ex
WIT az to form the drawing up OF deposition by Loep
against McIenry. IN
The case was then adjourned to this morning OF 10
o'clock