Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-06-18
LAW REPORTS.

1 LAW NOlhA-LIs % LCfs ONuJfs-lll liz
Court convened yesterday morning at the
usual hOur and Immediately commenced
the call of the new cases on the docket.
The orders and entries made were as fol-
lows, to-wit:
Murphy vs. Rains, plaintiff called and
suit dismissed.
Smith rs Goodrich, appeal dismissed
and judgment affirmed.
Edwards VS. Witsett, appeal dismissed
and Judgment affirmed.
O'DOnnell VS. Reid Il Anderson, plaintiff
called and suit dismissed.
Hickey d Son VS. Bingham, plaintiff
called and suit dismissed.
Blocker vs. steamer Natoma, plaintih
called and suit dismissed.
Dickford VS. steamer NatOma, plaintiff
called and suit dismissed.
COster VS. Kindale, plaintiff called and
suit dismissed.
Walker vs. Mayer. plaintiff called and
suit dismissed.
Jourdan VS. NJ. q l.. r. r. Co., plaintiff
called and suit dismissed.
8fll vs. Gallena, plaintiff called and suit
dismissed.
Jarvis vs. Bickerstaff, defendant called
and appeal dismissed.
Steiner Bro. VI Bilbow, plaintiff called
and suit dismissed.
Pickerell VS. Griffin, defendant called
and appeal dismissed.
Huer Us Berton, p~laintin called and
suit dismissed.
RuSscr ct al vs. cahill, defendant called
and appeal dismissed.
Nelson VS. Schade, plaintiff called and
suit dismissed.
Franklin VS. Lucroni, plaintiff called
and suit dismissed.
johnson vs. steamer Julia, plaintiff called
and suit dismissed.
Page vs. Doyle, defendant calleAhd ap-
peal dismissed.
Durham VS. Sheppard, plaintiff called
and suit dismissed.
Pleasant vs. Smith, plaintiff called and
suit dismissed.
Cooper ct al vs. Burr, piaintiT called
and suit dismissed.
Calendar for to-day:
1851 Augur vs. Hug ct nj.
1852 Fritag vs. Meyers & Dedric6.
1853 Kirwan vs. Mills.
1854 Levy vs BuXbaun.
1855 MussO, ir.. VS. Bowers II al.
1856 Faley VS. Falsey.
1867 Brown vs. Wickersham.
1853 Semmes & Co vs. Robes0n ct I'll.
1853 Same vs. same.
1860 Hayes VS. Cogswell.
1861 Duffy vs. NJ 4 o st'r-Natoma.
1862 Harvey VS. Augur.
1868 Foley vs. Duffin d Bro.
1864 Celebrates VS. Waterman.
1865 Prophit and wife VS. Boyle.
1867 Kane vs. Warner.
1865 McCullum vs. Cameron.
1859 COOney VS. Cunningham.
1870 Pettitt VS. Woltering.
1871 Poole VS. Peres & Co.
1872 Cole, trustee, vs. Leath.
1873 Pickett, admir-, vs. Hare.
1874 Peluel vs. Hitzfield.
1870 Collins VS. Curry.
1876 Coleman ct al rs Jones.
1877 Menken Bros & Go VS. McBain.
1878 Miller & Co vs. Dickens.
1879 ROe VS. Mancourt q Bryson.
1880 NJ and A ofM VS. Richardson.
1881 Union Bank of Tennessee - Town
send ct al.
1882 Walters VS. Ferree & Andrew.
1888 Lee VS. Bethel & Montgomery.
1885 Palmer VS. Sutherland ct nj.
1886 Mayors VS. Hughes.
1887 Mitchell vs. Gilbert.
1858 German National Bank " Warren
ct al.
1883 Graham vs. Delap.
1890 Dimes VS. Johnes.
1891 Fades vs. McCullock.
1892 Moore VS. Pioneer Express Go.
1896 Peplow VS. Ruffin, eXe'r, etc.
1897 Skipwith VS. Allen.
1898 DObbin vs. Case.
1899 Egbert VS. Cooper ct al.
1000 Aiken, agent, VS. Schwooh.
MUNICIPAL CoURE.-G. ". BaidrdH, |
JWd9e.-No Court yesterday. His Honor, |
the Judge, still being sick and unable to
attend.
CHANcERY CoURr-Wm. N. Smith, |
C0Neefior.-This Court meets to-day pur-
suant to adjournment. The order of bust
ness is not known.
CIRCUIT CoURT.-G. ". ReereS, JHl9e. |
His Honor. the Judge, delivered his opin-
in the lnandamus case of Wallace VS.
Williams ct al, yesterday morning as soon
as Court convened, which Will be found
elsewhere.
The remainder of the day was passed in
hearing motions. A large number of the
same were heard and passed upon.
To-day the trial docket will be resumed.
'fhe cases set are as follows, tO-wit:
Nos. 233, $50, 237, 23S, 240, 241, 245, 2l7.
2I9, $50, 2jl, 25S, 255, 25513, 25S, 259, 2G0, 26l,
262, 263, 26j, 266, 267, 26s, 269, 274, 275, III.
CRIMINAL COURT Van. Hunter, Judge.
The following names compose the Grand
,Iury of the above Court: james Elder,
4. J.. White, j. VI. Patrick, A.
Radjeski, H.. b. Wells, 4. Seessel, s. 5.
Spicer, \. G. Finnie. +. E~nglebreth, r. S.
Joseph Alden, X. V. Vredenberg.
W. b. Mitchell. Court commences regu-
lar business on tomorrow, taking the
in It's regular order, commencing
at case No. !. Attorneys defendants, Wit
nesses and Jurors must be in attendance.