The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1869-12-24
Clull or APPEALS.
Decisions Rendered.

Tie following are The decisions OF the Court or Ap.
peals Just rendered
Judgment Arir1,la cith Costs.-Cray VS.. Wake
|, man; Smith, administration &C., Vs. Erie Railway;
Crlttenden and another vs.. FarCnld, Arnox vs..
Johnson; Copper, Jr,, aud another vs.. Wheeler and
others; walker Va. The long Island Railroad Hunt
vs. singer, stougAtaa vs.. Saaford; The Union Manu-
featuring Company Of Connecticut, vs. Lounsbury
and Others Touilil sou vs.. Miller, Mills ana another
vs. Stewart The People or the State VS.. Snyder, Ford
VS.. stevens, Rowan d. Case, kuhnZ vs.. The Ameri-
can Fire Exchange Insurance Company, Ihaycr VS..
Clark and anotncr FISHER y5. Hall, Day vs.. The
ORIENT Mutual Insurance Company Burnham W..
Onderdonk. Belsoa ". rnton, Reed VS.. McCourt
Hamilton vs. The BROOKLYN city Railroad Company,
BoyCe VS.. Burt Plumb vs.. Tubbs Gray VS. Palmer
FreelOve ana another VS.. Cole ButterwOrth Va.
Could Grlnlths vs. llardenbnrgh, Cole vs.. Depeyser,
Hoppech Vi. Arcuipaid. itelnsen vs. Graves, Knapp
Farmers Bank ana rust Company vs.. Harmony
Fire and Marine Insurance. Company. washington
s Richmond, stilwc vs. Mcigs.
order Affirmed t6th Costs.-Cathnel VS.. Taliman,
staples vs. Iallnian i'ettgrew vs.. Iailman.
Judgment Order " Gs'ie,'at Tenn Affirmed, soith
COstS.-WOlf vs.. Goodaue Fire Insurance Company.
Judgment Repetsad and Ne,c Trial Ordered,
Harrington Vs. Dor and others, Ravens and another
va. The Erie Railway Company, Quinn Vs. Lloyd,
Gunkin vs. Mutual Eeaeat Ll!e Insurance Com
Company, Parmeies vs.. Cameron. Mcdonald
VS.. Bunum the WaJ ne and Ontario Collegiate lnstl
and Boston Railroad, Morgan vs.. Jandon, H0dgekin
VS.. The Montgomery Mutual Insurance Com
pany, kcNev VS.. Inc nope tlrc INSURANCE Company,
Sllliman vs.. Define.
Judgment Resc,sed ana Judgment for Pzdifatif
on Demurrer, f..--Freenan vs.. Charter Oak Fire
and Marine Insurance. Company.
Orrter or Geltefat Term Affirmed. arHh costs
against the Appellants IeTSondug.-Baker and an
other Vs. Becker anu Others
Judgment or GeJtssut fefnl Affirmed ana J,tdg-
raent Of Special Ie,Dt Affirmed, NTH Constellation
vs. Babcock, StocAer VS.. Partridge, Dyett Peckham
w. Ferrin MyricS
Judgment Moo.aod, Decree to be Settled by J,tdge
Hunt-BrOwn. eAecatrx VS. Brown, executor
Order ~ General Ielrn ANlaaed ana Judgment
ABSOLUTE for the Dejs7cant 1cjM COSts.-Iownsend
Manufacturing Company vs.. Foster.
Judgment MOdyteL, DecTee 10 De settled Oy Jud0e
GfOUeT, Costs or bJh Parties this court ana the
court BeiO'C) TO DC ia'd out or me EStdteScneut-
Ter vs.. Smith.
order or Genera, Term Reversed ana Judgment Of
the Special Term <Diynted, rith COSts.-StocAer Vs.
Partridge Markham vs. JandOn.
Notion Denied, toNh Zen Dollars Costs. Meyer vs.
AmidOn Iearguineit ordered; Purdy vs.. Mitchell,
Starin Va. The People, &C; Justice Vs. Long.
order or Gene al it,ut Reversed ana order OF
Spectut Term Agbntcd, acut Costs-Kelogg w.
Ames.
order or Genera. Term Affirmed, ,oi,h Costs
Kerr Va. Kerr
Judgment or General Term Reversed ana JadQ-
r,e't on Report heJeree Affirmed, scfth Costs
Young vs.. Brush, Biawell ys. Smith,
Oyter 0f tie Ge9tsi III Term AFFIRMED and Judgment
Absolute Jor Pa a6!D, erfh CoSts.-Smlth VS.. New
YORK Central Railroad Company.
Appeal DISMISSED, totlh LOStS.-Juan w. Grant,
Ford vs. Iathr0p; In the matter or the Eyerxreens,
The People ex ral. Cute va. Boardman, DeDerente
VS.. Deyermaud Freeman VS.. Kendall; White vs..
Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Com
pany; Many Vs. Biogg.
Judgment ReoeiSea and a Nelr T11dl Ofde1pd-
DAVIS VS.. The People, Ac. Baccio vs.. The People.
Judgment ANIrDted.-Moran vs.. 1ne People.