, 1869-03-31

future payment OF tho cost Qf the building, but
thai tne defendant refuses 70 Execute ne secuEH
DamAeeA 81 100, with attachment tn nd a AGAINST
. hen-resident nle.teineas stated a 4aSA6a
Eide c vofe :: Edwin RdFazdA Case bau-
JOAN /. Stockton L Co '. uarfc.d Live Stock
Insurance Company. Attachment - against .
non-1 esldeut Indebtedness declared al $aA.
TIE IL FEAxboSx poMk1
Foryfoor more dover solts, By Thereso La
Framboise against ~ Eany defendants Mere con-
menceu yesier1lay. These Affect the following |
iots Il. ~ and q I, p. noones addition.
i'd EocE !, NorgauB subdI, sion, ID east
half oi southeast quarter OF Section Il, 50, !.
hes 1e; / q Hleeta 4as'1e sofssap Subdivision
Lot ~ l. D. boonea Addition.
Lots 2 and - lsloek 4. Aorg.ns Subdivision
fots snt 10, Tiock I, Norgans Subdivision.
Lot L s., s. P7as1sr,ss Subdivision, IN eass hai of
seuthe2ss quarter Of Seetion u, 9, IL
Los 81. Block ) Morsann Subdivision
Let T. Block J. same subdivision.
Li.A 7and $ yloeas : HosEsns Subdivision.
Lou ) md e / .. Booaes Addition
s ssaess a.a 81 o seeon Z e. Z
Lot 81. Aloce : NORMA Subdivision
Lots 81, ss and &, Pollock Subdivision
Lot 81, eAuc subdivision
Lots and 3, Eablns Subdivision, N east half OF
southeast quarter OF Section II, 50, H.
Lots 8, and t, PullockB SAl,dlTtAl0n-
LrL rs, Block I. AoIGans Subdivision
Lots zhl !, EAne block.
Lot u, Hioek = sane spbdIytaoa.
Lot 10, Pollock = Subdivision
LIT :, L i. Cu0ncs Addition.
Lots and $ block = Morgan 3 Subdivision, and
L1.s 8 and q pF3stsnG ~ ssnd''tsaon T. :,
Bf as II 13t sna .sa. 1s ' Of Lot
Lots = and g, same block
Lots Il, is, - and -, Block l. 4organs 6und1g1-
Io.a - md ~ and thc zrest hslf of Int a D1oet
lols = aud 70. l!lock I. same subdlv1siou-
ho,s russass 3gss H2.a su,s,t.ts0u sH'atx,,,r
Lot "a same block.
s; Lei n,Ssf ssa Sssa se. ,se sssa'gs'Sa. sgsas
lot s5, Pollockb 6ubd., lsion-
Lot &c and the east si1 feet OF LotG
Block Acrgan's Subdivision
Lot II, Block 4, same Subdivision.
Lot 4 L u. DooneA Addition.
lLts II, Il, 81 and IS Bones Addition
Fnu,nc rca, don1 dasah f9wIs LOWE ~. p,t,,,o, "a,
dover In the we9t half Of the northwest quarter
q s. tc'tnn 4 S, H. The claim is a. the widow Of
William D. Egan, who died Ia October, ls5a
DISIE11p WIFE ...
J, Ellen Ave5!r. Addison Avery. Proceeding
for divorce With atIidaTtt Of the pon.readeure of
~ .as b M ee@paS sns
be does not rcaile IN the State Of nlinotAr The
hill alleges thaf the complainant has resided IN
NRs ma.r1ed to The defendant Il Bos.on, Mas, On
the 18th day Of Masrh, 1sGa and lived with him M
III about the lst Of February. 1851 excepting dur
was, us 3s alleged. de.ert1on BY defendant The
charge l. detertion. The mother aAkA the custody
Of 10y Willie, her CHILD, aged aboat six yeass.
Comfy Court.
The vim Of Patrick Hogan was admitted to pro
hate, and letters te1tanentarJ Issued 10 Bridget
CulTan under bond Of ii, ,4OA
The will OF Ianici Heart wak produced. End the
widow, jane, Received lGttcls to administer under
hond Of go, ,6oA The widow, nndcr The viii which
WAS c1ccntl.l on the sta dny OF January 1888 l.
the eOly iceatee-
,. crAnnlAxs M Apxrsrs7n4roHa
Eatate Of Sarah E Davidson Administration
granted to Sllas II. Moore under bond OF S1s,ooo,
nnd a4o guardianship Of the nlnor, Daniel ". Da-
wilson. under bond Of &s,u0
appointed to administer, under bond Of IL, ,Do0.
Atuses Vaughan being Of ase her guardian was
Edward Powell was appointed guardian Of Ellen
Ray under q N,nd Of te,ol4
Estase OF Thomas Morgan. Declared settled.
Recorders Court.
Thomas Conway '. Richard uartnett Judg-
ncnt on yerNct for 31sA
GAZE NEHKARp. ---.-
Tho Recorder Is engaged In the rcheAr4ng Of
proceeding for dtvorCc Thts Is the case OF Bridget
keRtlng y. James Heating. This cause after d.
xorce dtcfeed. came back from the Supreme
Court Lccause Of errvF In the nwnI Of alttuony the
decree entertn by the then Recorder Nan IJuren}
giving specific pEoee1y, instead OF stated year
LII dsy u a.h aeana a. I'm ~
IN tho year Is+6, Al Albany. n. T.. 1nl suhse-
quent removal, in ls4', TO this city, where the
charged the husband with de.crtion ard alultcrJ,
alleging that he hal clipped to California
VII xIa "Ee Nsg butler. 1t also showed
him to be the owner Of a house and lnt NJ. ala
Thtr asenue, With also house aud lot No 100 San
Ea1poE street There al also an arcE1ncot that
md M ON. e ta Sanes SIZE s. sas
the nrorertJ IL Chicaeo ~nS IN great par. earned
ny her a9r an y. IN soe pazs ~ nes
personally eevel with process lie answered, de-
nytng the allegations at marital inndelty rs well
70 setter ii. condi.son, Hah lie Assent Of IL vic,
leaving WIN heE the Possession VI Furnished
house, - wen as the sun q $40 per month upon
which to support heEell, the 10 bc pa4d by
his agent III Chicago, and the rrut Of pa:t OF
the house In which she lived Ehlch she suhlet:
e. r. a'so n slsTs to hare sent her fnm California
stolen from the mail Elorc1nent and adultery
wesc, as has been said denied 4 trial xas had
ncsn,, 9Gi3ts !ndEe @ ssa Boren IN which thefr was
that the defendant. had wfully deserted bis wife.
The t;ecfte WIS thas he transfer hlA tte to the
M ~ ~ pha 70 ns
lcltars fees the Hlle to release her dover In The
nansamon stfStt psoIerty. multitude Of petty
rres~td.ass followed, anta The decision OF ;ne 81.
1of H1t TIC case which Is still o.
ACTRESS '. AGENT.
,,,Se Saa.e ann am Atty '; William F AlreJ. Decree Of
NlEa1Ce granted on the ground Of deSerttou. The
tte9sulnony ID tna case vas gtsen by reattieuts Of
rhl!adrlShia Ellen Pierce, I resldcnt Of Essex
snd u [thniaocphla III WoIdng n collar factory
WIN me complainant, and had known the defend
AT 1a ios =, about M tss years She nsw q the ma1-
EgrtnR Of 1850, and Of dese1tiou by deteu3sut nj
Sa!caEo IN November, 1850, he having gone Cd
!inm !'n chicago With Joun9 actress and not being
papers q aUstlaIa norsce M e L eas Wes,ons ao u
tne ume In Pntladelph.A, but q citizen OF
known ii. t.elen,iaut three yeaSs. The dcfenhsnI
h1d tod htzn Of bis marriage and OF his clopemeus
i.nm s1 Ihieaso. where he and his wife wers living
ne met him Al Sacramento, talliornta, in Decem-
". lse.. Al that time he said that he nau gone
m nu ~ W'.4 MiAs Cur and never intended to return
eettet ne ehouh NOT, AZ het father was 4 wealthy
tnan N cincinnati who would not do anything Tor
irnt aoss ho@sre1 Q, aeE mantaEe With him: he did
PLY with h.s wife
TWO MONTHS MARRIED,
n1!HA :. walker '. Henri! II, Il, Walke9 Pro-
ios ..Se1ce on the Eround Of adultery. Inc
Gssdaas Wiz III q Inst ana nc
stsah s s0e second monthly protntype OF the we'd
fans.a, anS; ShscaFo With one Ellen Randall The d.
etty Fstuea 81 sl,aoo fS'''''~@ fN~f
49,. HAN1 or SEHSE
M9aona g. y, Riley. lately 1}ueknan =. william "
The cumrlalnaat statcs that she Ta. m,1r. -
ne1enaaai IN the lAn day Of December. tsta 1t
S!eVeiana ohlr It Is Represented tnat on The ANh
aa5 q Soscmher lass the defendant Il gae nous
~ ftend, struck his wife to that extef thst she
,,s5 .e1ame eensetea While she was Ia tnis cond-
Voc Voc ene hiesr- that he removed her TO = hoie,
Without her anon le.1se and there coutuei hnr in
toou., kicking the door - ~ 70 prevent INV one
1o.n f1 ssssshs per: h,nseif. however, rcneN-
Eg h1s III Treatment by words and
blows Having again reduced her by hfs
uucHJ TO condition Of tu.ens.bisv, 1hc ss1s snn
was ta1tn away, md upon arriving Il cpusctpuk
neSs IotnA hezsel in railway car On tbs r,la1i u
New lotl. her hnshAnd accompanying her. ~
M MHslhS a NV lori sick, eeTr, lime and hIuhed
sne aSefs taat khe remained ther. for aboot two
,ycafs, whcu her husband abandoned her lesytno
hef IN city OF strangefa without meatA AttunesT
: cEAIEe,l an Incident In The ais mil i ma.rea