The Tiffin tribune. (Tiffin, Ohio) 1868-1887, 1869-11-19
Conrt Prnoeedlngs,
Samuel Utz VS.. Coles and Gibson
Judgment against defendant, s25l,

q.
Amanda Musser vs. Geo. NJ. D
Stewart-breaeh of promise. Judg
} meut VS. defendant, $4,000.
Amanda Musser VS. Geo. 81. Stew
art-bsstardy-verdict, guilty.
| H. G. Bloom VS. Isaac Startsman-
promissory note-judgmeut TO
plaintiff, s124 go.
John COrrigan and wife vs. JOhr
Crawford and wife-slander-verdic
for plaintiff, $500.
Jos. Mcclellan vs. Joha Boucher
assault and battery-verdict for plain
tiff, $500.
Morris ?. Skinner VI. Hezekial
Searles-on a note-judgment foi
plaintiff, s2,981,65.
Harriet McCaulley vs. Levi Hare
assault aud battsry-vsrdiet fol
plaintiff, ;s1OO.
Laura Huffman VS. John Huffman
-divorce-decree granted.
Mary ]. Ingman VS.. John G. lug
msn-diyoree-decree granted.
Rebecca Wonderly vs. VIM. Won
derly-diVorce and alimonJ-decree
and alinOny granted.
Susan Crouch vs. Samuel S. Crouch
-divorce-decree granted.
Michael R. Maltz VS. Samuel Wise
Judgment for plaintiff, 1892, 2,92.
e. A. Reichard VS.. Charles Ma
han, VIM. Randall, ct etdl-judgment
against Mahan and Gallup, s322, ,48.
James Clark vs. David Clark-fail-
ure to fulfill contract on land lease
lease rescinded.
Tifin Agricultural Works VS. Mi
chael Hoke-suit brought OF note
judgment against defendant
G. NJ. Ogden vs.. B. z. Meford-
judgment against defendant.
L. J. Brainard & 90. VS.. \. Burg
derfer & Son-suit on account
Judgment against Frank A. Bursder-
fer, s106, I6-dismissed as to Andrew
Burgderfer without prejudice.
Griffin, Henderson & Co. VS. Rich
ard Fl. Rogers-suit for goods
bought-judgment against defend
ant, s469,93.
The State of Ohio VS.. George Rim
gle-indictment for abusing an Of
6cer-nolLe entered.
The State of Ohio VS.. Cornelius
Leahy-indictment for assault and
battery. Defen dant plead guilty
fine SIS 90 and costs.
The State of Ohio VS.. Cornelius
Leahy-indictment for assault and
battery-noILe entered.
The State Of Ohio vs.. Mathew j.
Clark-indictment for assault and
battery. Defendant plead guilty-fne
S5 90 and costs.
The State of Ohio VS.. Charles
Chaney-lndietment for grand lsrce-
ny-plea of not guilty to grand lar-
ceny Withdrawn and plea of guilty
to petit larceny entered-6ne S35 90
and costs, and remanded to Jail until
paid.
Maria L. Stamer VS.. Frederick W.
Observation-Disclosures adjudg-
ed putative fathsr-ordered to pay
mother of child s1OO 90 for its main
tenance. -
John Myers vs.. William F. White
man-petition for judgment on me-
chanic's lien-judgment against de-
fendant for S136 g.
George F. BretE VS.. Henry Strouse
ct al-suit brought on promissory
note-judgmsnt against defendants
for S219 so.
John Gwynn VS.. Samuel H. Stoner
-suit brought to recover damages Of
defendant for permitting horse to run
at large, by reason of which plaintiff
was damaged, &cHiudgmeat by agree
msAt sgaint defendant for, s24 and
Butler, Brown & Clapp vs.. VIM. A.
Doerle-judgment on power Of attor-
ney against defendant, 81 663,
Shaw & Baldwin VS.. VIM. A. Doerle
Indictment on power attorney against
defendant, S265,
Fulton Reed VS.. Daniel Smith
suit brought for unlawful detention
IF property-judgment of plaintiffs
damages, by reason thereof, one cent.
YOUTHS ILLUSTRATED BIBLE HIS
book embraces Distin>
yuished Characters, Remarkable