Staunton spectator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1896, 1869-04-27
Legal Notices.
no A. 8. SHAFEH and w. LEROY

II u
Il NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. You being non
residents of the State of Virginia, are hereby no.
tilted that on the 18th day of May, 1869, in the
Stata Of Of VVharotesylie county of Albemare
office OF the Circuit Court of said county to take
the dispositions of Richard W. N holland and
others, to be read as evidence in chancery cause
now pending in said Circuit Court, in which
Richard w. N. holland is plaintiff, and myself
you and others are defendants And it from any
cause said dispositions shall not be commenced
or if commenced shall not be completed on that
day, their taking will be adjourned from day to
day, at the same place, until finished;
ANN LAWSON TEBBS,
Executrix of w. w. Tebbs, decd.
aplS-4t
VIRGINIA AT Rules held in the Clerks
Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta
county, the 9Th day of April, 1862
John Weller and Margaret his wife. PPffs.
AGAINST
James T. Byers, in his own right and as Execu-
tor of Samuel G. Byers decd, Nancy Byers,
Samuel Byers, in his own right and as execu-
tor of VIM. Byers. deco Robert Byers, Jon.
athan Slower, and Jane A, his wife, Mary Bv-
ers, Benjamin Weller, Jr., Isaac Keister and
Mary E. his wife, and Sarah Elizabeth, and
Virginia Susan infant children of VIM. By
ers, decd-IN CHANCERY
The object of this suit is to obtain a settlement
and distribution of the estate of Samuel G. By
The Defendants Jonathan Slower and Jane A.
his wife, not having entered their appearance, and
it appearing by satisfactory evidence that thew
are not residents of this Commonwealth 1t IS
ordered that they do appear here within one
month after due publication of this notice. and
do what is necessary to protect their interest
r. D. SEARS, Clerk.
BALDWIN, p. q. ap6-4w
VIRGINIA at Rules held in the Clerks
' Office of the Circuit Court for Augusta
county, the 9Th day of April, 1869,
George Rusmisel and Asher Argenbright. Ex-
ecutors of Christian Rusmise decd. - PPffs.
AGAINST
William Phillips N. j. Buck and Samuel Paul.
Defendants--IN CHANCERY
The object OF this suit is TO recover of VIM
Phillips, who is an absent defendant, debt due
the Plaintiffs, and to attach in the hands of the
other Defendants, and restrain them from pay
ing over, or delivering money or effects in their
hands, belonging to, or due said absent defend
ant.
The Defendant William Phillips not having
entered his appearance, and it appearing by sat-
isfactory evidence that he is not resident ofthis
Commonwealth 1t is ordered that he do appear
here within one month after due publication of
this notice, and do what is necessary to protect
his interest Copy-Teste.
R. d. SEARS, Clerk.
Trout, p. q. ap6-4w
VIRGINIA AT Rules held in the Clerks
v office of the Circuit Court for Augusta
county, the 9Th day of April, 1861
Richard Barrett.......,......., ......., Plaintiff
Joanna Barrett, in her own right and as admin
lstratrix of Thomas Barrett, decd and James
Barrett, Michael Barrett, and Hanorah Conner
and Robert Knightly. -............ Defendants,
IN CHANCERY.
The object of this suit is to recover the money
for which property was sold by Thomas Barrett,
belonging TO plaintiff, to wit a house and lot in
Staunton
The defendants, James Barrett, Michael Bar
rett and Hanorah Conner not having entered
their appearance, and it appearing by satisfacto-
ry evidence that they are not residents of this
pear here within one month after due publication
of this notice, and do what is necessary to protect
their interest. A Copy-Teste.
r. d. SEARS, Clerk
Trout, p. q. ap6-4w
"a OEaCE.-The Co-partnership of Hilb s
IN Weller was dissolved April 1st 1869, BY
limitation and both parties are hereby author
lied to sign the firm in liquidation only The
accounts are ready, and all persons knowing
themselves indebted, are expected 10 settle the
same promptly. Our books must be closed
M H1LB s. WELLER.
ap6-2m-Town papers copy 2m
nESSOLUTlON Of E'ARsTN ERSFFIFs.
~ james A. Armentrout having this dav pur-
chased of George A. Armentrout all his Interest
in the business and goods of the firm of Armen
trout s. Co., also all the interest of the said Geo
A. Armentrout in the manufacturing establish
ment of Armentrout & Co., the firm of Armen-
trout & Co., is this day dissolved by the with
draWal OF Geo. A. ArmentrOut from the firm
The business hereafter will be carried on bv
James A. Armentrout and Charles F. Haines
| under the style of ARMENTROUT Sc co.
| The new firm will collect all debts due to, and
| pay all debts due by, the old firm Persons
knowing themselves Indebted to the old firm will
please come forward and pay up, and persons