The Democratic advocate. [volume] (Westminster, Md.) 1865-1972, 1869-05-20

Circuit Cowt.r--The following cases
have been disposed Of since our last
report;
KinS vs.. Eby, reported last week
was given 70 the jory about 10 o'clock
on "Wednesday morning, and alter being
OUT all day and night sent word to the
Court that they were unable 70 agree !;
they were discharged and the case con.
tiunea until next term.
Matthews VS.. Haetier, action for re.
plevin removed to Baltimore county.
Shipley vs. Gorsuch, action for Sian.
der; nou pf0ss.S ~ sEAE
Michael vs.. Sewers, action for mali,
cious prosecution judgment by default
aud motion for inquisition.
County Commissioners VS.. John jain,
action for debt; non pross.
Dixon IS. Wilson, action for debt (;
Judgment by default for sl1l75
Roach VS.. Shiplcy, action for debt ;
non pross-
George Wilson and wife VS.. G. W
Webster; removed 10 Baltimore county
Edward W, Selby VS.. Johuzee Selby,
Jr., action for assumpsit on account I;
verdict for defendant, Motion for new
trial.
Stocksdale VS.. Stansbury, action for
malicious arrest settled,
Winters vs., Gardner, trespass; settled
Winters vs.. Caples, I"
Aaron w, Cullisou and Isaac More.
foot vs. Elizabeth Stocksdalc and Geo
j. Stocksdale, record from Orphans
Court; removed to Howard county.
Young VS.. Hoover, two cases, action
for SANDER non pross.
Albaugh & Albaugh VS.. David Baer,
action for slauder; non pross,
Lots and others VS. Hiteshue, repeyin
bond judgment by default under rule.
John Doe aud others VS.. Richard Roe,
action for ejectment; non pross
Linton 4 Lamotte VS. Geo A Krouse,
action on case; Judgment by confession
for sl44.43
Jacobs VS. Yingling and Stem, action
on promissory note; settled.
Hel,ebridle, admir-. Of IIeltebridlc
VS., Thompson, assumpsit on two notes
| judgment by confession.
Stansbury VS.. Selby and others
| judgment BY confession for s242.43.
Stansbury VS. Myers, action of as
sumpsit on promissory note non pross
| Utz VS.. Sheets, debt on single bill,
judgment by default for Sl69
Dinterman VS. Waterman, admir-. Of
Waterman aud Saylor, debt on singl,
bill Judgment by assent for sll0. n
John s, Stansbury vs. Johnzee Selby
and Lewis W. Selby, action for debt on
single bill |; Judgment by confession foi
s424 81. - +- 'e
| Haines & Mitteu VS.. d, p. Goodwin
assumpsit on promissory note; judgmen,
By default for 1894 32.
John Delphy aud Washington Short
VS.. NJ. A, Lauvcr aud VIM A. Martin
assumpsit on promissory note juds
ment by default, under rule of Cour
for s115.07.
| Aaron aud John Criss VS. Peter. A
Shipley, assumpsit on promissory note
judgment by confession for S165 40.
| j. W. Erhart, surviving executor o
Jesse X. Bowersox vs. JohnWm Wing
ling, action Of debt on single bill fol
800 Judgment under the rule by de
fault, aud extended by the Court for sl03
John Houck VS.. Henry Shaeffer aud
others, debt on single bill for 500
Judgment under the rule, plea by default
and extended by the Court for STA so
Susan Hoffacker, by her husband, vs.
Falkenstein & Hollenstein, action fol
assumpsit on promissory uote for $3.50
Judgment by confession for S30l79
| Crabs VS.. Crabs, action for assump
sit on promissory note; jud gmcnt b,
confession for SIP
Sophia Jordan vs. j Ritter, survivin!
executor Of Jacob NJ. Ritter, action fo
debt on single bill judgment by defaul
under rule and extended by Court fol-
SPAS 10.
| Motter VS.: Zepp, assumpsit on prom
isory note Judgment by confession io
| s123.S0. ~ f9'a ''rf 90 m
| State VS.. George Dickson, indicted
for felony and horse stealing; plea o
guilty entered sentenced TO the peui
Tertiary for G years.
| State VS.. William johnson, negro
indicted for assault on Henry Hawl
with intent TO kill, guilty; sentenced /,
the Penitentiary for Z years.
| State VS.. same, indicted for assault
aud robbery; indictment quashcd.
| State VS.. same, indicted for robbery
guilty; sentenced to the Penitentiar,
for years. n
State VS.. Jacob CIink, indicted for
felony, guilty; sentenced to the Peni
Tertiary for 2 years. aa
/ State vs.. Joseph Young aud Nelson
Myers, indicted for felony guilty sen
fenced Tor years each to the Peniteu
tiary. W ea =
State VS.. John Linton, indicted 70,
burglary and larceny, guilty, sentenced
| z years to the Penitentiary. ea %
i State VS.. John I. Franklin, indicted
for selling liquor by the pint aud up
wards, fined $40 and costs. lgF
| State vs.. same, indicted for assault
aud battery on Margaret Harkly; fiued
| $50 and costs ~ y sifl3s fil
| State VS.. Jacob Barnhart, indicted
for larceny not guilty. 0
~ xx,,k. q. -.