The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1869-07-12

but only To few weeks impri sonment which will,
perhaps. be RENTED to hun Dj tno graclousness Of
the EmperOr and so, Ia the next case MOnslgneur
Rudlger will have TO suffer easy, gentle aud com
Portable martyrdom. But, At all events, this Is a
proof or the progress Austria has made In the path
Of liberty and enlightenment and al Interesting
medicines OF crcumstances that the Bishop Of Linz
will be irs man tried oy the irst jury In That capt
tai It is at the same time refreshing to remark That
the majority OF the good Catno &c population OF Linz
and Upper Austria have hailed with applause the
proceeding OF the government and OF the courts.
While this side OF the Leiha perfect calm was
reigung heavy storm ragged IN the Hungarian
House OF Commons. Alter the last tumultuous eec-
tions, BY which the opposition was considerably
strengthened and reinforced, hot struggle between
the Deak or moderate party ana the lef, was fore
To an OutbuIst. The debate lasted three weeks,
about seventy speeches ON Doth Sides were delivered
with considerable display Of talent eloquence and
patriotism, and still number Ql speeches. were IN
store, when Deak, the "wse man OF the country"
The oracle OF party, rose, briefly summed up the
long debates by declaring that he could not discover
therein great deal OF new arguments, anu That he
could not himself bring forth ANYTHING new on Sub
reasoning he carried the day. Haif dozen
speakers, who were still Inscribed for ad-
dresses waived the same alter Deak having
spoken ia clap-trap olt-repeated in that House, aud
SACRIFICED their speeches ana Wich them the aumra'
ton, II not OF the whole country, ut least OF Their
wives and children aud their constituents. The re-
suit OF the debate was that the address, as drawn up
by the Deak committee, Was carried by majority
Now IA to the merits OF the debates, even the
shortest extract from tnem Wohiu neither instruct
line IL, self TO pointing out, lne Two main qHeshous
at issue between the opposite parties. The Iirscon
Germs the delegations ttnese are, as your rcthes wall
remember Two comlnissoilS OF SILKY members edcii,
selected from botn taranenJS, tor.tiie purpose OF
treating, each separa ely, the Common affairs. These
deegaIions seem TO tie Lett, VINO at pure DoT-
sODal union to form TOO close Tie between IRE tWo
STATES. Hungary and Austria alu tney enueavur 10
snpersede them at once. me DeaN party, on ne con
trary profess IN principle likewise al aversion from
the Delegations, but tney argue tnat, I0r "lhe
present, they sec noslnng better 10 put III the
place OF tGat institution; 'nat THIS has I'll
now stood the test and proved beneficial 10 Hun
gary. Tals Is surely tfae, lnlsmucn Us III now the
Austrlals nave yielded IN al OOlntS IN dispute; but
II Is question Whetn + this VII always be slie ease
ami whether two or three years sutfice 10 test the
value OF political institution. from what nave
Just stated your readers VIA also easily ilier mat
the party principles in hungary are widely
differing as 1T may appear at iirst sight.
Inc second poilt ia d4spute Is tne existence OF q
connon ministry OF inc iOregn affairs. IN AIS reply
10 the reasonngs OF The Lett on lAls suDecp Count
Andrassy the Hungarian premier, justly argued
that hungary EXERCISES sufic.ent influence o,ithe
foreign policy OF Aus1fia, and Lhat ioreieh poicy ia
general must lie conducted Oy Que hand. Now, the
nrst assertion OF Count Anafassy IS certainly true
ana Wen founded, the p1roga of the Det To
grant the subsidies ana recruits the article 0! the
covenant" according to winch every utaLy
concluded with Ioregn POWER must 6e
separately made IN tue name OF hungary
and laid before the Diet and, 1naliy, the
appointment or a hungarian Under Secretary or
state tie Foreign ONCE secure TO Hungary sum
clent influence IN the loreign pohcy. But as 10 the
principle OF unity IN the conduct OF oar i9reign
policy Count Andrassy did not speak 0JRd JiQe ald,
speaking as a dlpiomatst, he could and would not
say the i and real truth, ana TINS Is uDas tue prii
cple o unity III foreign policy is not compatible Win
the duallsul on wnlcn the present constitution vi
the Austro- Hungarian monarchy is grodDded; that,
us those who are Initiated INTO che secrets ol our
foreign policy are aware. there exists, in reality, a
strong antag onisn between the Counts Beu5t and
Andrassy especially regarding the German Guea-
tlOn and that tue influence Oh Count Anuiassy, WnOse
policy Is, By the by more IN UNISON Wltn .tbe view,
anu wishes OF the German party IN Austria is now
prep0nderatng. To-day VIII not dnate on llls
subject, but as illustrative in some measure or Whhs
nave just Stated wil oniy relate tue substance VI
a political conversation which lately TOOK place be
tween tue French Ambassador, Duke de hraInont,
and Count Andrassy, and al winch Only Baron NO
pesa. Lord Steward 10 the Empress and lew Hun
garlan nigh flnctionaries assisted. The nan topic
OF conversation was the evenIualIfy OF an alliance
between Austria and Fralce, an idea iol9 since
cherished by Count Beust Count Audrassy, declared
that Austria BENG sun dlsorganlzed III every re-
spect, could enter INTO no Dlnung alliances AT all,
and that Tor the reas N der alliance SEEMED 10
MIN not very valuable ia remark winch must py Inc
by be taken cum graRO J0iis. TO TINS VI. de Ora
mont replied that thanked Count Andras5y Tor his
open hearted communication, which he would relate
10 MS sovereign and declared that the Emperor uad
already ceased TO draw Austria into the compass OF
his political cOmblnauons.o am quoting tGs YER
bally, BECAUSE have 1t ron trustworthy ear
witness) Your readers VIII easily make out the
sense OF the last quoted words OF III. de Gratnunt,
translated from the elegant slams OF hufopean
nigh diplomacy into pam E1gtish.