, 1869-04-09

schtnr. Indebtedness stated ~ t9o&Qe.
Ws,ter y. Airport '. Ho1nt1o o, Stone md 0ssian
cnH.rsct Of sale Of south ten acresof east half of
northwest quarter Of southeast quarter Of 6ectous
3 .. Is
John GuchEist and John l. Psauer '. Marcus
N. BarteT, George Houletts aud 7. 8. baker.
Case. Daihagcs Ltd At 3l.on with e1ptis ia aid
wealth and responsibility Of Bs.ber. ~
INSURANCE..
Patrick Harrington :. Stock and Mutual 1usurance
Company. Assaupat Damaged, 5000.
DIroKCL
- Emma = Woodrow '. Joseph J. =. woodrow.
that she Wa married to defendant on the 14th day
Of July. 1851 nj Newark, New Jersey, whcn she be-
Who would t be tiaa M saa @ faithful ii nasosad. shs
charges, however. thAt he has been neither tlnd.
tue Or faithful, tut that, On the contrary IBIS
hIs duties ~ = husband She alleges :. thAs on
the evening OF the!r marriage" be deserted nef,
and hhs not from that tina lived with hes, noI
supported, OF aided to support het, leaving nes y
her oWn Industry and the assistance o. her !nehas
to furnish subsistence for herae1f. She asks a..
Hofe md e Pe aoTed 70 rm;a 5S F1a Ii Cotton
I.ccorder's Court.
verdict c. va cycn % for the cty. Tna Was IN aeuoa
to recover damages for the loss o aolse af ,nto
tnury to carriage, which being ulaFen1 leA iato
On Wells street, u or near The intersection q u
Vision street In tls case the Court held i TO ne
the Law that II the contractors flaced h
cs5!es md lights to protect pastenSefB during lae
nscht AMI thesc we're removed ty accident OF DC
sirn. hv The act OF God or the interference Q!
ncichInr hat without the dcfaut u the cry OF
Contractors aud without their knowledge, then the
ctr vas not llnbIe- -,
Nll;am 4. Scott '. Mlchae! sul1lTan. Henlevin
q, iot Of boards md eoa1se lumber, with count in
trnrer Verdict for Y,tAplI4 for the property and
flH damages
s. Scott Constance. tof use ut william 4. Hib-
hard :. John G, walker and ". T. Tompsins.
suit brought upon repesin bond. Verdict for
gave gave "a instruction lit i Tie defendant Walker
before and after tue Tine IN question aessntea "a
time leaving his wife In the soe control anu maa-
agelnent Of his personal property, then + m!gat
Il l.npugned that be had constituted her h!s gen.
e agen Sot r. hs sinE assn a,1 naena fo1 t l"s
tsay1nent Of sum due for board, then the nta1nttu
naI lawful right to retain the property until The
sutn I'M. fur bDatl WAS na4u-
nIyoKcEs uEAS5En
| louis Ohscudnrdv. Olga OhsenlofI Dc-fee
af diynrce Oh tho ground Of desesfion. Iae COM
pl:lnant testified T. residence IN Galeaao snse
tcarA lie Was married on the 9Th DAY Or June,
1865, at Frecport, TO the defendant, who he said,
not Rtnce lived With lin lie always treated her
xas cor1r.6ora'ed " ono Iernhatd Myer, Of Ue-
| Mary F1acne :. Jacof rtaeae- Decree Of d.
!! Eorce on the Gr,undof dElnEe1Atss. In this c.se
tive witnesses testns The complainant sM95e .2'
| on tho l5lh day 0! August Of Which !eas sac was
married t. defendant 1'J him she hal had three
oshrr having been wiurted ~ a Nj. Hawley, Of
fsnkten. She testified that her husband hal been
! fur IL lrast threc yca1s 2n Aabiual ti!inAaTI u,
| competent and unwilling to support inn5eIt ana
family. The other witness was ono John 7. Elm.
norman, the father OF complainant lie sroEe 70
and ,he se - q gFsat aase
Ma1y Tucker r. John .. Tucker. Decree OF d.
| vorre On the ground Of trunEenness- The com.
planatt In this case testified that she had resided
in his city during fourteen YEAR, and that she Tas
married TO defendant In March, 1850, since which
tanlr he las becn aItictei to the USE VI ss7ons
h.ht'al drunkart, drinking day hy day, ami thas
alxays. more or it-s under the influence Of lqnor,
TO rsosircc which influence he spen1 al his earn.
lngs to the neglect Of his family. ono Ludwig
Wolu testified 10 the saulc state ot facts
| NEW sI1Ia
John ", SteArus Ct A1s. {s3kcar1l1 So1a '. John
Wright Assunps!t, with a.tschmcnt In MD. wri,
Issued VI afsa1ist nn ahseondln2 debtor. Indebted
4 ness stated nj ,1u'-
Railroad Company. Case. Damages la!l 81
S7S'.sL In this cause the rr<cje only vas hleri,
hut II Is underwood that the sult Is brought 70 re-
Rce1cnI.
DIVORCES AsrKp.
| Et]u1und newcomer :. Jlnc Newcomer, AalCN
Conkln- Proceeding FOR dtrorco on the groin!
| Of desestion. Complainant eets up MARRIAGE o.
the SIN day Of April 1s4;, Mt PtE!n, Slaz.-a Corn
ty, n T., mil charges @ertpn for 0Tes TWO years
Augusta korscacl r. Julius Z. kos1hel Pro
ecedin4 for sliEuree on the Groand Of cruelty ant
lrnnkcnnesa The complainant AYERS q lezs
marriage In this city on the 18th day Of March
1872 and the birth Of one child u hoy}, now etga
yeaT* Of age. The cElet! Is dated back to u
| year 1861, when 1t Is alegc1 defendant ylolentI.
Threw a rocking chair at his wife. The like act
Afc carried down to 1868 and 10 the present month
| in The cnurke Of which 1t IL sait tho bus
land made havoc among his tableware and III
tsated his wife BY tearing her clothes, beattn
| and choking hex.