, 1869-07-23

TRIAL IN teta case NJ this ni0ueut, Such, then, u
9aoSt ;at lou o. M. canoa aod submit 70 tae
place ot The trial nf thh eatase now dxel aud tho.
II slaIl ee at 1eaat tneutJ days distant "01sr nnd
s' required to Fave to Tx
Judge 0f1A ! naa suppssca thst; some ting
s sai,e sroaud Past oi saesc oejecsos Wss, VrS,
made yester1ay and oyerrulel Our canuns bro.
! vtdc that when prescntmcatis made 1t shall DC
served upon tbs nrcuseI, md nso upon one oi the
prrscnteIs, as .easkt thirty days PREVIOUS thereto
! Inc copy OF the prcsentn1ent and tbe wnttca no
itse Or etatlen at!nR re tnitts day', Which "
/ npoo do tccused We havd tao criaeuco Of sha;
tcJsice II It Ia necessary to produce u. Thirty
stsssd ,s PIN il y tho o. dsaaoa thas sao nssnou
ior M r,ssesse. ss : The ps1ty reani,es: Ths uisuoI
sue, Est lht court. They NelnJ making any A1p!l
cation y the Dishop for q commission. IncJ t;i
not ask ALA TO subp@ue any witnesses. ,,1a for ~
and how, after the court l. of7aulzcl, thry ap.'lJ
10 Il Tor continuance. Treruls no autboFity ~
rIn a as s 9st1 sS :saa a' H.
ior .r1ai nna a,ye iheir reasons. section /.
'ssss 'ssss !s 'ft .ner s sss sSRi s'.Sas u
Tor The tria thu r'ure muts Ls within the hu
ccfe. The llstpp. n II there b. DO Bishop. tho
bundME tonnlttcg, rlaJ postpone The Trial fsull
time 10 t1Gnr frr csnsn s1lown or wftrn iu.t,cn ~.
ourc. H." Thr NLhop = tic party % apply t" lf
nGu, i,ir, Krciin;, !. shrt wtru .l,s t,nrt IA
cuu.ttttc,l t, IN u,rsrh,r pt i,n rrr.ltr ,,,,,,,.
eer o. rfs.f'! =, scy slnll F'cesntnSh a,ilo',e'
risius al till canon ami huynv ,,e1jhcr,trir ron.
sitrrr The pntnr, j" afa rncrri 10 and No. T0rru
T. 70 authority given n ons eanons for ~.
to fhls ,lnc ni1tr Tho expiration
4 The thirty tays Il In. ncvrr hrcn a',owcl ID
own ruu.trur, Hills, 10 t,Arli IN ,hr ptuvrr oti,
i tbIhk-shp r0as,rrtIuu Thai has tuen nut u,tJ,i
i, IM iorInrr cA-rx. THRU ii nu application hsr0
tor ooptnllAucn Tint th1i rtigIt Is Aulnuttsr l.,
"ntsrfnr md Inc ohlrctpns taken 10 tis citation
au ,.tpu anu place o! trinl 1rrn dlsposod OF ynl-
Mr. THOMPSON, tin mt i!ko u complain.
We lrrsalniy have mt 1na"fea,ed s'',at .ri.l
tus wU Hare no ;,rrr,arntio1s natie
e 70 mic tr,a' y th: ea.e = ID. inns When
NY of VII saapn w rtrsieoes M eot 10
Tho APRON, mt nt Of the time AMI tlaea for is,aL
usErr i matter u fairness u the accusu,l.
caDopicaItr0 tr0rsjoul OF ether t{locc4c. a1t n thu
only fA!r Interpretation OF our own caHon; an!
sulIs,s,.. when ths canun "nIs iii tbs ii,shao
lupJ rf1ut 80 and 70. it means th.t whrru crTt1n
rreshJtcr ii sttlnr lu tic uiacu Of ths Nashon hp
sseps into hIa snoes Win scicfscco co
ia tho.a nowerp ~ welt a othrrn
| do think runy II pleasc Tho cnuTr that we arr
sa.!sS 70 l.t,s c1s!s..!on aa4 70 some
YESTERDAY in tEs utmost ruod faIt6. Whsn I'M,
citation was tirst served rnon Mr. CHENEY briurr
vrni~ isft.r " ~ 1ne IInnn NJ ~ N .h ,., s. ut,
nsss s1nrrstInr snn,, t,I.n -, ,rs"n - a tis .I a w.
scnshc sonTt snn h. cna n nud M ne+1n1si -.
fnr thc nntnnsn ~ ~. -, ~. sa.s f,.n
rrnt,rd IL shcT. n mar rsrrsin, ~ al .-anrnon,e
With r,nht l.rr ~ fh,s r,tms " ,i.nu y - !. .t',
case for ihs Eciecton or tho presn, I trt4 tst1..
We fanna ts,t hnIn, s.e.n,t ~ G.,stt:
all O! lhcm-wc could malc no seicc,ion With
would IA our es,Jmaiton s.1n,tsse .o,t1e rttn
s;I.n,,on NC ~ nG ,. |" Snntl We acae pala ~
b1trsrnnrrnnd he,. r.stnssr d.
oi,r nf1cc,nn. 'st n, M ,,t.,iIr;;on ~ thc onr
tInn ~ rian,c1 mar ,. Pc!ony !, nss , ~ nv ~,
~ Stt i, ,nnt,nn arrH,, X u 80 ~ ,n II+. o
Sa5s NhjcH i Tas ny, ntras ~ II M sSe t,rr ~
III; 1,nne.s hrt t...t rnn,oijaI wnb ~ nr,.o.,
saai ,,thI RENT Il anu , We nso ursca ssA r. has
Ehssnsr ne s,,p p1esh!ssrs wsne qas!!asd,
esnsd ZEE ~1u 1a 1a eee =, 1c ea @ W.
e:ted ali tne I'D rules oI The common Law. wach
tr,rs nsst IN Inn ~ ~ y" ,os naas
whirh nar, f.en oaanfsE IN occIeat. ss,.,i n11ass
Win s, shn Wisan o S9s .r Wi % ogn 1
hroNa ~ tYr 1ndren sns nT7sat, ~ ,hs fsnI nv ~
brought them here and tney ncre LIGHTLY snorrn
he court TEou esra md e,sIt ,o'on M. ~ ~
lie obrciioca xhjch NC dic,l nnrcEnISd IN p,sa
sthNhes1inr~ tsnt fhey wr,,II 10 e,,.r,soo1
En-. 1c san'a,nst ~ ~ ne eonsf l',Ens fEom espsn
Eut II seems thai the cnnrf entirely ,a,sresariei
them, one and MI. aud that 10 ysry sl;tn;iaTy
11ss1s5 = s,a1ls = r. :as" r., spa tsss w Il! Was
be consiuerps1 AZ having been organized, 10 csr
tam extent, sort Of quasl court and Inc specfI
csaioas -, an0 s enalses Mels presented, We pre-
entirely uton the corrscturss OF Our nnif,nn
We presented them calmly. and canditt5. nnd ne
/ =
utmost coni1'lence-we dii not have the nrst
s1tnn.m q nsnet ,hah 5ness c1ceptioIs C Woald be
the ecclesiastical Law of this conrt. wou1d cut
some neurc, evsu at that stage ofthe proceedings.
1et We come IN mere tnts fnofnIc aut VI are me.
Win tne SANE coa mo aSl!h Now. u " st
faitneas here @
Judee oTlS- ! must call tho gentleman to Or
aev; Me Me,sIa' y ann'tns tEe court
1of a4n gnsstt9 t,T9S r,,z snc,.,n =, ro,, ,o,.t
aud II il no. ior me 10 Interfere. Sui must Gil
sou TO order, -.., -.
M1 THOMPSON ~ wl TT p he scsnccttsl
II SFFIcEn r The s eqptt mis-,
order: ~
NV i ns,se Se veil ST. s1s .cs e. e;
ncInt. I wopia Ike TO Iro% @ Il thc.e c1u Ts
aDS resonea'en Ena,sTst woal l!Ee .o
aI nn2S lm sucee y; e., o's no" az leooeaSs Stctpn
cese OF Illinois What Ilocs It mean when 1t saYs
The citations shall be served tNcu.r DAYS before
tne I'M nir ~ Irt,i sa,i a erxe.! tnTte
i,e1ore. fle can come 10 no oihcr coar!asoa thaa
the Que have stated that the IT'S, refers enttre-
fv to the ftrnn and psre N rhlrh 10 ctfn thr currr
md ,hr ,oSI th t1,ns erd i,cn ~ ~, ,r,f ~ M
@ t Nv ttt tsnnt @ Se ~ ~ I.ee ,os sae tsl', " ac
ans Reasonable construction q The matter. sub
Ell that we are entitled to all the ad-
ynntacps which fair ami jthnrat
enastEEs.tta, ~ ... , .a.1 .ta uuu t.eia la