Delaware tribune. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1867-1877, 1869-10-28

We have recently published two items from the
Delaware Gdzeue, in regard 10 suit brought
against the Z. W. * B. K. Il Co, one of which
was designed as correction of the other J. H
saserhnder, the gentleman bringing the suit.
has called on us and stated that neither of The
accounts were correct, and he makes to us the
following statement:
He says that ON the morning Of October 4th,
he bought an excursion ticket 10 Philadelphia
and return, and went u philadelphia on il.
During the day, the Nod hal 20 dam ircd the
track that he could not got back on the cats and
50 clme on tho boat, not using the ticket on
inc lIth instant lie again went to Philadelphia
and returned On the ! 80, ., m, train accom-
pauied by his wife When the conductor called
tor Ills tickets, he gave one issued that day for
his wife, and the unnsCd excursion ticket for
himself The conductor said. the ndy's ticket il
all tight but yours is not NIr S. t1ld him tlat
he had bought 1t on the day of the n1Dd and
could not use i, and that the ticket agent had
SAID It was sill good. The conductor said he
would not acknowledge 1t as good aud demanded
iare' Mt. s. refused, when the conductor sand
ne would put him of tile train. lie had his
hand on the bell-rope to stop the train when Mr.
y. yielded to the solicitations OF Ills wife nnd
paid the 50 cents demanded under protest that No
would hold the company accountable
On the morning OF the 18th inst he went 10
The depot, IN this city, and presented the ticket
anu drawback check to Mr.. Elliott, the ticket
agent, and demanded the 81 cents. Mr.. + lintt
asked what for' MIR. S. told him, and Mr.. f
ehiu NC uiu Hotuln8 10 10 Win the matter. Mr.,
s. then told him he had SAID il would be good.
and Mr.. f. answered that that might possibly he
but he could not redeem it. Mr. $ then said No
would ''lay an injunction against the company. $
aud walked of. AS he was leaving a gentleman.
he sub -equeuty found to be a Director of thp
company. asked what was the trouhc. He told
him the circumstances, and snld he intended Ia
sue The company. The gentleman asked 10 Sc,
the ticket, and then handed it back Mr.. S. thet
went TO Squire Puhls and entered suit agnins
the company hut having engaged counsel with
drew The suit and lett the matter ia the lawyer,
hands.
In the evening" Of that day me Director already
mentioned called on Mr., : ria der aud said ht
hid come u redeem that tci,,t Mr.. s. told
nun u was not in his POSSESSION bat In the hands
Of his counsel The Director -ud he would nav
Mr. 8, reasonable damages for hi. trouble &c'.
but Mr.. :, answered that IT. would not satisfy
him, rs lac was not willing t. b. insultcd by the
companys employees. The director then off r.
ed To have the conductor call OH hun and offer
MN suitable apology. lilo sai Elliott had moth
Ing 10 do with rcdeeming tickets. Mr. :. asked
MN why he did not redeem ii when be showed
IL To hm: The Director said he had To 90 on the
train and was so hurried he did not think of il.
or he would have done SO. On last Saturday this
Director again called on Mr.. 5. aud asked what
he Intended TO do Mr. g. referred him to bis
counsel,