Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-02-25

CHANCERY COURT HNt. II, Smith,
CbGnceHOr.-The cases set specially Tor
to-day sIe as follows;
7l5 Hill vs. Ball,
7l6 OvertOn VS. Glover.
III Miller vs. Caldwell.
100 Ketchum VS. Dew.
723 Jones VS. Sharpe.
IA Bolton vs Kerr.
I2G Patton rs Wells.
T26 Brooks vs. Bettls.
72S Terry vs. Leonard.
729 Milton VS. Robertson.
$50 Owen VS. NOOe.
731 Mount va y )senstoek.
1872 Rec vs. Chambers.
1888 Bartlett vs Ruleman.
735 Bates We Cobn.
1856 WsggOner vs Winters.
73S Boro vs. Hartley.
740 Friedenwsld vs. Mullen.
T4i AppersOn - LuGdy.
742 Sims vs. Simpson.
743 Hodges vs. Bank of Memphis.
744 Seay vs Street.
745 Byrne VS. Finn.
746 McKenney va Beehn.
TAI Wicks VS. Leftwich.
74S COston VS. Street.
749 Boyd vs. Same.
$50 Ofne VS. Ford.
752 Knapp VS. Southern Elk. Co.
753 Isaacs VS. 6tillmaB.
754 Dickinson vs. Beer.
755 Mills VS. Farris.
756 Block VS. COhn.
757 SERyne, ex-paTte.
| 1853 Mcbride VS. Grant.
J 759 Norris vs. Lamb.
| 1850 Noxon vs. Haughwos'.
78I Chamhers vs CEenshaR.
| 1872 Hill vs. Dimmick.
1853 Hiedelbach vs. Mullal,
764 Terry VS. Jones.
765 Norris VS. Witt,
1855 Cash vs Curtin.
767 Hallum VS. StaTka.
76S Btinkley vs. Hopkins.
769 Blackwell vs. Bartlett.
no Laird vs Beard.
III Williams va Monsarrat.
~ Riddle VS. Werner.
773 Rhodes VS. Meyers.
LAW CoURT-H s.. Lee, JtdQe.-ThI
case OF Johnson vs.. Wicks ct al, now
before this Court, made very little pro
gress yesterday. The evidence for tn;
Dlaiutif was concluded late YESTERDAY
evening, and that OF the defendants De
gun. There are q good many witnesse
for the defense, end it Is likely that tn
whole OF to-day will be occupied in ex
amtning the same. The above case viii
consume the remainder OF the week
All Jurors, except those empRnneled II
this ca. e, were discharged until Monds,
next.
CIRCUIT CoURT-George W. Reeves
.JaldQe.-The argument in the molten o
State VS.. Philip Garvin and his secuTi
ties, George W. Cheek, John Donovan
and Jesse Page, Jr., was closed las
evening about six O'Clock. Owing {
the lateness OF the hour, the Jury wer
discharged until nine o'clock this morn
ing, when the above matter will be sub
mitted to their consideration. To-da.
the Acknowledgement, in behalf Of tn,
State, will move the Court against Gar
vim and his securities, upon the count,
bond, to recover monies collected by sal
Garvin, as Tax Collector for Shelb.
county la 1857, and which he has fsile
to Law over. This molten will ebgsg
the Court the entire day.
MUNICIPAL oURT-Geo ". WaLdrGs
Judae.-YesteTdsy's calendar bein
composed Of cases based upon Judgment
found against the defendants, as dePu
tised Constables, forgthe unlawful serviC
of criminal process, was disposed OF b
submitting said cases TO the Court, whic
imposed q mn OF n dollar upon e&c
defendant.
Only two cases are Get for trial to-day
which are as follows
2203. State vs MoAuliR, extortion.
2220. State VS. Pepper, assault and battery
CRIMINAL COURT. Vim. Huntei
Judqs.-The case Of State vs. CoyRs
} charged with the murder Of James Fore
eDgrossed the attention of this Court yes
terdsy. The evidence for the State hs
not yet been concluded. Messrs. Ca
, d. Thorne appeared for the State, Bulloc
and Anderson for the defense. This ea'
will likely engage the Court for q day {
> two.
BANKRUPTCY COUNT j. Latham
Register.-The following cases are su
: pended, awaiting correction Samu
e Clements, Joseph J. Tinker, Jas.
iChoate and /, P, Osborne.