Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-02-19
TRE COURTS.

MUNICIPAL COUET-G6o. ". EatfTGn,
Jud0e.--There were no jury eases die
posed of in this Court yesterday. The
business transacted is a. follows:
State vs.. CosgTOve; Motion made to
Quash Indictment sustained.
State VS. Herman, charged with exsor-
ton motion made to Qlash lndIct-
menC held under sdvisement.
The remsiuder Of the day was occupied
in empauueliug a Jury in the cass of the
State VS.. Giles Smith, indicted for the
unlawful service of criminal process.
Pending the trial of this case, the Court
adjourned until this morning, when the
regular calendar will be resumed, to-
gelher with the following cases specially
set for to day
1854 to 1858 State vs. Williams.
"a State VS.. Brooks and Becker.
2525 State VS.. Conway.
CHANCERY COURT YIN. Il. Smith,
ChGncelIor.-To-dsy is motion day, COM
meucing at Y.
DEGREES flied yesterday were SIS fol-
lows:
Strain VS. Vsnboddie, sale.
Thomas va Saffsrsns, reference.
Snow vs. Richardson, finsl.
KerchOf VS. Pfsnnesteihl, ssle.
Wiekershsm VS. Merrigether, reference.
Ivy VS. Bond, injunction dissolved.
Sanderiin VS. Johnson, i~uterlocutory.
Sorrells VS. Douglass, conditional order.
Should there be time after motions,
yesterdays calendar will be taken up,
commencing with the case OF Keith w.
Dryfus,
CIRCUIT COURT-Ge0rQe W. Reeves,
J4dQe.-Thc motion Of 5 ate VS. Philip
GarVin and his securities was again
taken up in this Court yesterday mora
log. The entire day was devoted to the
investigation Of this matter. The aTgu-
ment OF counsel closed about sundown.
The Court then proceeded 10 chsFge the
Jury, after which they were discharged
until this morning 1t g O'Clock. The
second motion against GsrviR for failure
70 pay over monies collected during the
wear 1857 was, by agreement, postponed
until tuesday next. To-day the Court
will again take up the trial docket from
which the following cases will be called
for trisl, Parties must be ready TO try
or continue generally;
AZ Stewart q Bro. VS. Chapman.
SO Simon VS. Marks, Pump 4 Co.
81 Kenney VS. GOodlstt.
90 Ehipp & Co. VS. Trot,e-.
e3 Moore, trustee, VS. Jones = Bro.
Sc McMullln VS. McWllIisms.
81 Plempton VS. COgsTsll.
IS Webb vs Ssymore.
100 Mcdonald, gusrj. VS. Jones ct 81.
l0I do do vs. Ward ct I'll.
los do DO va Wsrd Of al.
lOS Union Bank vs. ChsJoberS.
l05 Mitchell, executor, W White.
, lO6 Hswley vs. StOckley.
l07 Miller vs. Jones.
los Wilson VS. Pope.
, 100 Ulhmsn VS. sullElSG.
. iIG Uhman VS. SSillman.
Iii Kahn VS. 8 nlmsn.
/, liz Wynn VS. CrenShs|.
: I43 Weaver VS. FOwlkes & Jones.
ia Neeley vs. Mckinney, executor.
; Il5 Cash, admir-, Us Bolton.
: lie Mathews & Co vs. Aydlett & Co.
. III Young VS. Msschsm,
J IFS Lewis VS. Easters.
: ll9 Powell VS. SugsrHlan.
I I20 Cash, admir-, We Patterson.
l22 S lie VS. Nswtop,
: l23 Berry VS. B alley.
Z l24 State, use, ETC., VS. Smith.
: l25 Hook VS. Thelbslt.
: Law CoURT-H s. Lee, dHage.-Tbi
, Court Is still engaged 10 determining tn
: Watson Trustee cases. Several of then
I were disposed OF yesterday. The juE.
4 In the cases of Watson, trustee, versa
h Memphis and Tennessee hslscSu COni
. paDy, brought In q verdict for the De
fendant. To-day, the last three GASES oI
Y last Fridays calendar, sn which Watson
a trustee, is plaintiff, will be taken up an
heard.
% CRIMINAL COURT. - W0s. Rantei
re ,JudQe.-The csse of State versus HeDr
8 Med 1nald, Indicted for "naliciot
1T shooting" was brought up for trial ye'
"a terdAy, and engaged tbs Court the entii
day. Up to SIX O'Clock p "a. the css
hsd not been concluded. 1t is very Ike
that 8 verdict was rendered iasL nigh
I'd To-day the regular calendar will oe r
- sumed In proper order,