, 1869-12-18
A HEAVY LITIGATION SETTLED.

&G0, ,0CO Damages Rec0vcEed-.A Sulk
Tor 100000 to ba CoHaAeAccd
A:ninAs 1he ltllnoia Genital kkatl-
road.
From .h< Dubuque Hs51I3, be-. H.
ago We save ~ accoust u she ia! Il lnd,anspo-
llt, Il the Enl:ei States Circuit to1ft VI one o.
the csses cUuu only kLoHn here ~ sBe sOata
.an government contractors To stand 81 their
uztSAn made tnE1 ards tue clude d tie aeE. The
cs<eA lttetest nrtnter OF the Rr4n nefra2na Of
1!llntls IeL1,A Kairoad, and n~ve Ju4e been fer
un2Itd " The recovery OF H. oo IA beaAll Of tne
ptlt. .e3 ihtertkAd
BlascCt j Co, xho Ne1e large RoEernmeut con-
tractors ii Calro and Cincinnati, eeut oas tnrT
agents tarouRn Northern lnoo,s Nd tnto lows
ii purrhast gram tor tne government They
roueht heartily II Dubuque Hna II potnta aioog The
lIt:Lo;s Get. III RAlIIoad- The f1ittoad company
ia.eA 70 tutL.sh stanA2or alton Ia tine 10 eaanle
coho BlAtde,l Co to Get tae ksa.u into Tue gov
| efuuett hands rncer thar conuacA Large
| ens1 si;:es Of oats u sacIa lad fur weeta or
on ND rsl,so.d pled 1p OUT OF doort. tor want ot
| warehouse 1oom, and eIposed 10 the YEA Der.
-. St se 70 ne Ss ID pasn sSs IRE
Et1,eo nom getstrg their pr.caasss turo govern
| 4 enr haltA orMK 10 The failure Of tie railroad
no,nts enere the Eove1Inet, ~ss 10 rece.ve r,
and - q consequence the eontzactosa acd pol-
enase,a zttnsed 70 pay, ana so7ght 70 throw tho
il II soe n III ot isss nunber Of tue grain men Of
| Dubuque, Ga.tns, And other potnta eou8at me
| kr1l tsfyNe. Of Gf1f1tn Knight Of this city. Ia
cunfel The purchasers to stAId By thssr bargains:
SG1ts Ktse rstltEted II 1ndAn4pon4, IN lac Guketl
| Sta.es Circuit Court, and IA the sapeI'or Court Of
t:srcnra,t Attachments Eere is.aed md 1eyfed e
| pu ire interest Of Nj. Coin. tn sht asm o1 Q. T.
1 Coeb, Chr.stJ Co, In CtnctoEast, and taat nrtu
vas forced INTO dtssotus1ou. The oeieadants eI'
rle3eu the Aelet, eoun-el st lndlanApa: And In
c.cLaa to defend 1ntm; among o1heIs Nnsse,
S11.e4 Senator Hendncks 2cd Jo*eph AeuooAd
nf 11dtara, nld lsteolr, sEnitn i Wxrcock, O
C!Lc.cn1u. In the lall Of ls@5 = test Gaze "a "a
: Fltcx " couu>el fof TIC rIAuur, AID AeAsF4 Heo
dicks ano Acpoua,d for defendants, Ia ~
! CL!,td S.2tes Circuit CoEft- =: t0e closa o.
f1.al ixse4IT upwards Of week the jury retufne'
| = serrici snr the platrt1 tof Tho whole Amou .
| CLAIMED, Another tess case OF those bEpo9hs L
| Giit1tn ter The plsaofi1. and Lacotn. smith
| WA{r ock fC1 The defe1dsnts, &ud resulted. AfLeF
let etny t1tai Of nearly two We-ks u verdict 70
! t!4nun tor over yl<,"o, being the futi am'un
UaJ;nF ben defeated II bosh potnts Of the tina
itl44nts nave snce only xo1xht deiny IN The o;ne
J cates. about 40 weeks a<t one Of The nrm {
Coth. xsceu Co, xtaEet DabQ4ua ~ m4k
settlement Of the EatseSt AID ~ 5oon ~ MI. Gs!
= olh vns ihsookh with Toe RsoMoetR t1alh n'
= ros1stSppk uer+ eutefE0 90, which on AoEdeJ r
: suited IN The parmtnt Of "a, 90 dantg-a y COZ
: t Elt1deM Cn, 10 the as&nfns3s ot the claimant
!. II sttus tnas the Supreme court ol uunoss ni
= 1etsn,ly ot7ed 4 oecszton to tAsa AEanss q
- - | Ttt ot& Ca1ual Railroad Company Nh&ch e&:A
] Inhss tho Il8ta1IJ OF ttas co@pAnJ 1ot ~
q dsnaKte a0Eded b. their failure 10 furnish IAn
pQIt1nou foF Gsain dQFmx tns Winter Of 1a&4 u
/ tle tpT.pS Of 1884 md coon. ElAsden %.