Urbana union. [volume] (Urbana, Ohio) 1862-1872, 1869-03-31


tiou. The Court finds there is due, and
owing to the plaintiff from the defen-
daut, on the note in the petition set up,
the sum of S845,5 50.
Jos. 4. Johnston W. Juo. L. Johnston
and Cilynda BriIIhart-In partition.
On motion of the Court by R, C. Full
ton, Counsel for plaintiff it Is ordered
that by the oaths of disinterested free
holders Of the vicinity, one full and equal
third part Of the land in said petition
described, be assigned and set off to the
said Cllynda Brilliant, for her dover es-
tate, and that partition be made of said
lands and subject to said dover estate in
the following proportion-to wit; to
said Joseph A. Johnston, one half there
of; to said Jno. L. Johnston, one half
thereof.
Jas. Taylor VS.. Silas IgoU-petitiOn.
The Court finds that there is due from
the said defendant to the plaintiff on the
note set up in the petition, the sum Of
S195,O6.
Elizabeth Kenton vs.. w. w. Bates and
. Geo. Goslee-Petition. The Court finds
that there is due from the said plaintiff
the sum Of s329 80, on the note setup in
the petition.
David LOudenbackvs. Jos. Pence-pe-
tition-Cognovit. On confession of a
judgement by the defendant it was ad-
judged by the Court that said plaintiff
recoverof the said defendant, the sum
/ of S5347,9S.
David Loudenback W. Richard Ken
ton and Wm. c. Kenton-petition-Cog-
.novit On Confession of judgement by
defendant, it was adjudged by the Court
that said pIaintive recover of defendants
+ the sum Of S2354,5O.
/ SamI 7. MclIorran and others W.
Sam'I Baldorf aud others-petition on
note and mortgage The Court finds
that there is due and owing to the plain
. tiffs on the said note in said petition, the
sums ofSlO37 OO,and that the plaintiffs
are entitled TO a sale of said mortgaged
premises.
Henry Weaver vs.. Isaiah AIetts and
others-petiton-Cognovit. Judgement
confessed by defendants, in the sum of
S324,25 =
Henry SayIor vs. VIM. JOhnson-con-
ffrmationor salc-said sale and proceed
ings be and the same is hereby confirm
ed.
The 2nd National Bank Of dayton vs..
Albert. G. Harner and others-petition
Adiudged by the Court that said plain
tiff recover of said Albert G. Harner and /
others named the sum Of S575,2O.
James S. Reed vs.. Jno. LOCKER and /
David Whitmore,-petitiOn, adjudged |
by the Court that said plaintiffs recover /
orsaid defendants the sum Of 1854, ,43.
Geo. Cooper and Co. vs.. Hiserman & |
Aughinbaugh-petition. Adjudged by
the Court that said plaintiffs recover of /
defendants the sum Of S362,50.
W. o. Downs vs.. B. c. Sullivan-pe-
tition. Adiudged by the Court that
said plaintiff recover of defendant the
sum of S126,6O.
BrUbaker and McMorran VS.. D. Scott
and others. Court finds that there is |
owing by the defendants to the plain
tiffs the sum of S203,S8.
VIM. Sigiman vs.. Amanda Sigiman-I
divorce. Divorce granted by the Court,
plaintiffs to pay costs.
/ Henry Weaver VS.. JOS. Pence and 9TH
ers-petition. The Court finds that
there is due the plaintiff from the de-
PENDANTS on the note in petition, the
sum Of S147,57
John Enoch jr., vs.. David S. Yoder-
petition. Adiudged by the Court that
said plaindffd recover of defendant,
/ the sum of S27O,39.
Noble Osbone vs. Harrison LOudenback
petition, cognovit. AdIudged by the
Court said plaintiff recover of said
defendant the sum of S256,62.
James Taylor vs.. Wm.StOver-petition,
cognovit. Adjudged by the Court
that said plaintiff do recover of said de-
fendant the sum of S4OO, with interest
from March 8rd, 1869.
Thos. J. O'RoaTk VS.. The City of Ur-
bana-petition. Verdict found by the
iury.-''We the Jury find for the plain
/ tiff, and assess his damage at $1,000"
And thereupon the defendant moved
the Court to set aside said verdict and
grant new trial for reasons of file.
w. \ CoIwell, Executors VI Milton
Fithian. Adiudged by the Court that
said plaintiff recover of said defendant
the sum of S39S, go; thereupon defendant
demanded a second trial which was al
lowed by the Court.
LemueT Weaver vs. VIM. Stover-
petition, cognovit. Adiudged by the
Court that said plaintiff recover of
said defendant the sum of S127,6O, con-
fessed to be due.
NJ. Mason VS.. Sam1 Douglas and 9TH
rs.-Fore-cIosure. Adjudged by the
Court that the plaintiff recover of the
defendants the sum of 1925, found still
due.
Indictments for selling liquor to nU-
mcrous to mention were disposed of.
C0neeTUi1g Drv COodS Store. 1t is 4 mat