Ashtabula weekly telegraph. [volume] (Ashtabula, Ohio) 1853-1873, 1869-03-06


The following arc the cases disposed Of for
tlrc week ending Feb 270.
James scllIck va j q Dole, ct. al, sale con.
frmed and deed ordered
Ohio vs. Geo. IIart, ielOnlous assault cOntin.
ued on defendant entering Into a recognizanec
Ohio vs. Alvin Moon, grand larcenv conin
ued. on defendant entering into recognizance
of $1,000
Ohio VS. Noyse r. Leonard. continued, on
motion OF defendant entering into recognizancc
Df $500.
s. y. Osborn W. Laura Kelsey, ct aI Sheriff
ordered 20 sell lands
Ohio W Cldrancc Petric Horse stealing, con.
tinued upon entering upon rccognizancc of
$500
VIM. Light VS. N. b. Payne. jury trial. yer
dict In favor Of the defendant, second trial
granted I
gully and sentenced To- jail for 90 days on
bread and water, and pay geo fine and costs
of prosecution.
Starr o. Latimcr VS. j. L. Fillmore, continued
on motion of plaintiff.
Luiher Heath VS. Geo W. hingcr, confined
Wm. Griswold vs. i. Frasure, judgment for
plaintiff, $112T5. .L[C 'f]s
n. III. johnson vs Dayid CLARK, settled.
Ohio VS. Phillip Beach, assault and battery,
plead guilty and, is sentenced 10 Jail co days
and ten days on bread and water, and pay Il
fine nf St00., .- ---. .-- I
]. y. Patterson ,vs Jane Kennedy, W.P
lIowland is appointed guardian dd Htem.
Ohi0vs f4om Bishop, receiving stolen horse
the defendant being called, came not there
fore ills ordered that his bail be forfeited
amounting to $l,5CO.
II. Johnson VS. V. NJ Thompson, judgment
for plaintiff 1901.
Harry Curiicp VS. Susnn Curticr. divorce.
granted upon plaintiff paying $25 alimOny and
costs of suit
Sciramling VS. ST. John, continued.
v. II. Joiner VS. n. B. Payne continued.
Ohio vs Geo. Peters, Nollc Proscqui entered
by prosecuting Attorney
(has. Reed VS. JAS. Prosscf, continued.
A, T.. Kcilprg vs. Willard Marshal. Jury trial,
verdict for plaintiff Of $i,7i0Il,
Root VS. Vincent, sale confirmed, and deed
ordered. ...s. H.U.s.
F, Branch VS. s Harvey Jury trial. plainti f
purchased patent right note against defenG-
ant of $50, defendant refused 10 pay on
grounds that he had been humbuggei. and
had given notice in newspaper war;ing people
aganE purchasing snid Plaintiff had no
knowledge of such nOticr and was declared an
innocent purchaser and recovered amount and
interest. - t. 20. ---g r
Merrill VS. Ckanman & Harmon. continued,
Habinson vs. Fleming. continued. ---.
f. Hahn -rsbW, BabcockSs l-at defend
ants roSt. ~ r H E VS. u
2Iii6 Wilder vs. Jas Prossrr. co,,rucd.
S. Mead VS. Merrill Meal, settled nt defend
ani's cost ..t~ U-.E- .-~i
Eunice sel'ridgc VS. JAS. Scllrilsc, divorce
granted, cause, milful absence .LJHt c'l
w. ID L"prdop vsJ. S. Morley, Judgment
for plaintiir $25s9G
yGiddings VS. Carmichael, continued. on mo-
ton ot plaintiff. W ...f
Chelsea Webster VS. O. Stone, plaintiff or
dcrcd to give bail for costs or petition dismiss
ed
Williams VS. A. w Randolph, Judgment
for plaintiff of lsG0G,l9.
|, Prescott & Chase VS. j. Condt, Judgment for
plainiiHs S24656.
Mnngr and Tuttlc VS. r. T. Lloyd, Jury
rial, brought to recover InuHr"s rrr -fl-
covered. i46S7 %
Howe IL Rogers vs. y. A. Smith, ct. al judg-
mcnt for plaintiff Of S30T,5O. .. =.
II, Talcoit vs. D. Andrews, Judgment for
plnintif' Of Slf!D7
Sarah A. Brown VS. T. r. Brown divorce
granted. cause. .willml nbsrncc
Dolly Drlp"rv vs h., r. Gmvcs, judgment for
plaiuiiI Of &l46,39 ,r'.
Arrilla Moor vs. Hugh Moore, Ir. divorce,
dismissed without prejudice
w. WOfto't vs. u. Drainarl, judgment for
! plaintiiT of Sl09,O9.i ,r @n.r,.
Edward Baily vs. J. +, Baldwin & Sons, dis
missed.
CharlrsP. Mcad ys Silas aIcml. dismissed.
u. Tmtic vs. n. ID. Baton at ni plaintiff has
leave to amenl Petition, and is confirmed
d. w. Smith VI s. Robinson, ct. AL, default
and judgment taken for S5Oa,75.
w. p. WhiteCys n. 4. Cool, ct. al, dismissed
l.. N; Daniels VS. NJ. Capron Judgment for
plaintiff OF S+35. aa0 =. .l..|.