, 1869-06-03

did address her otherwise than friend a.,
not then state to her how much waa worn
Our1ng the second year Of my acquaintance wiz
went to Cincinnati often, md tninS ouce @ tu1,tx.i
her 70 e. . the theatre in that year.
1868. Or ~, make proposition Of Eartage il
b1Gasant: Sa1y time.
1e ni.,nfiT IL r. EpsS 9, lss one1cea
that Miss Craig had had . s1itor aaue4i Me1;ss+a
u lsA She tod me then that sae hsd oroktn or
hAd sstd that he had an ere On a rch a. ns
wonan- wore nng sne gave me N July. is.
% nns Ee1nsnnef r. weanns Il since The commence
wrote to plaintiff that nj uncle Et,ss Vea. E,s
me to Boston. When nIst went back 70 c.ncin.
natl after faNed TO keep nc eagagemen. pI na..
3 e aaa 4S q 9se sep,s%Ssa pant5 fs.s
tot one year. Tai new arrangement xas % nsis
| She said she would have to speak 10 her motser
| about The continuance. Shortly at1erwaEl She
told ne that her mother naA given her consent.
s a: Tq eona,on xeaG ., xeen nsi
nit Of our Keeping house. She told me that ser
mother WIS not willing that she should botat
the brother Of plalau1, In March, is5a say taat
Mithtn ten days would return from Chicago 10
e1neinaan ard Many nts sister: nor dit state
within ten DAYS or two weeks and marry her
DAUGHTER: ! DID NO. 80 promise the plalnuc
malned there ahoa. three weeks net 81:
named Jennie Brooks on TIE cars from
Cincinnati inEni,t to chsasp sae va5 looking -.
she was there cmp1oseA Is servant she rena.nei
there sone tEo OF three weeks remained tse.c
When Ieit I boarded down tosn. 1 lived in tns; @
way one or two years. About two months belorc
LEFT NJ. pucnlngs. ! had a::e.i 4 hoase. On
1ns Rsa RsS.e wa & sspt sSs
wnman who sAw md spoke 10 Mss Craig In
answer 70 her question - 70 hhere was, VAS
ne FAME gHe nk n iis gen
IN the house the night presiouA gos Up =.
about daJbreak, and went doMn town. as'ea!tl
p some nTAnsSs sa sna tes1na on T. , ~ a1a;s
| moment afterwatd, and We al wa1ked 10 1hr wcs
side Pollea Station where policeman seaoacs
the nlsi1tt1 While sne vas u Chicago that Hoat
| 20 to Cincinnati IN tew days and naT{ her II
plaintiff % nos ssss ngon ss r. e tna aas sH
hppsp in Chicago, sltpt In room On Randu!r
| nreet. The woman. who xaa doing wAsntnS !
MoT III s rer naua I d. moi know bow the pla!a.i
eane 70 Gnicaso u Juiy - LID no1 w;sss s,
unae. Whue Stirling On aiumhe1-ptle On the eve
| ing OF July 14th. 1854 We did NOT talk over q le
: | ter which she had received from Ars- Dunhtnc
fhtnl NC {p1antiR and defeutant) did not walk o
tHico while sne wa II ChtcaGp IN July. 1850 Ill
I | Cr1l2 did not leu me- ANYTHING Aho1t letter I
: eeIycd BY her from Mira Dunnlng.
E TAT tn. tuncture difficulty a1ose tetK &c
ernl Under, counsel for tne dstence, and AT. Tot
Ielotte, counsel for the plaintiff. The.Ce Ii iou
t ! It Necessary 70 call them TO os,ier.1
3 FIsne&s continued. While on our wsik On I
evening 0! the 14tn Of July, 1854 do net think
stoppef at any other rlace beside the inulber pl
o she the1e tainted, and took ae1 10 Bliss DR.
eiore. We 3,opped three o. Ioae times betxt
Bltss' and Dunntu9A When LEFT her al Dr.
I uirE's did not tell her ! Voc
return on the following day. Edid not tell her q
+ | would 10 around On the following Sun
q AMI ulalu kcr. In The 4prlrzg Of 1sio was Owl
s over Eseo,ooo 70 different parties the lasE
e+ amount owed to any one party OF arm ~as to
d Connecticut Company. l don't recollect VII.
o toll. the piatnu1 wss actual.y WORTH 1 tol!
y | Il could pay ny debts would 6e worth 5000
8 NJ real estate property On Michigan areuat,
:. tween Water and Lake stleftA - worth about
n same now a. It WIS wuTtb n 1861 !.
If AZ O'Clock the court adjourned until 10 OCH
e fnLmnrfrV UNOHHiH0.