, 1869-11-18
a WOMAN cEAMFlONED,

The TstsseIl Divorce CnBc The
Trot1bic OF Shaking OFT n Marital
k,b!tEutiou-y.nnt Constitutes n
stnd,uE aud Valid M:iTF,nEc-De-
Greg Of Uly0rcc tsFnntea to 31rss
UIsscll.
fyor, the Nttc l"rk Herald. .sov. II
cour1. ets;erdsy, 1etdt3sa the tollawlpx tatertas
itc otlnMu ond decsInn tn the castt OF uestFca
Bi4seI', hnd infant, bJ hsr er1dian, acalnst Joan
fnis II IN sctIon tor limited divorce on ths
ground 1l 2hstdunuen1. nntes sobosFA,on .
~ 1!s Sesasss II sbsso9
nent Is lot contested, bnt he deteaca
rests ptuu a hetiai ii tne mars.assA The r:atn-
Seeui}, X The enos.aEce Of net testimony Is tnat
she u4soc The acqua1us1rce Of tae oeltnoans 70
II, wss :nr as re-, Ing 9 % ts
| cArncity OF rEFte- TIE dtfenoans resided ~ sae
stu place. and there ccGneaceh p23laR Asien-
ttou- 10 neI. which fGLssr1eH foE several moaths.
acu &c, uiELa IN 40 Offer Of uatfiaSe 10 ne iatef
pa1 OF June, 1851. Hhtch+ after foNe nertta.loo oa
ihe par. 1t ine psa!brn, ny feason 81 the dtnef'
erce ia eoc'a etA:lpu lttt GEO her AID defcndnn,
| vas e. .ilI atcep.ed h1 pa1ptl VERY FOOD Attef
1hr eppuxemeot TIC te!endant a:ased to the plua-
| tlC that be tM Lut relieve IL EaH!a2e cele-
| OUT a1y ceremony; that these y efe many such
| u.aIr1aReE, AID be wished to W4ive the cefs.
MoLy. Tb!s NJ Erbt ehe retefed 10 10, bet 8
teres It ccnyertas1ccs followed. during ~hlc1 tbe
! subject IVES d.EcEssed, the te!tndant ulB1ng hi
yleHt and conIentlag that the nArttsge ne pro
posed Hsaa vsd a., sSe5 e1 Tosd sos =
| wildly msn,e1 Al Ii three clrrR: mcn should
mary fherr, lrd - Euch man SAD vile as ~
q ents prevailed, I'D about The Crit Of Joi5 shf
| uslrtaSe d41 val appointed Thu time dxed Ws'
The ls;h tf July. The defendant furnished plain
AND, win he assistance Of lef married staser
NrA S.:est, the plalEtG made aef Preparation:
for tnt raIriagc. On Ias is;h o. NV: fse M o.,
Sting 10 rer that she =. gong Y be NV
lid. She met TIE Jtfetdaas II Ne" lofk
srsy TO essaa ss5a and Tfaf, xh,!t
IL he carnage the defendant Erodnced p,ats
cod redditX rtE tt;ch taa cesn mace 1fo1
pSs 81. aoous fossn!shs previous. H. plssei g;
f.rg upoa her nnsef. stating Te!. - yoar IT, e.!
drg rn<; xc a1e asSH ss ses ~ ar
n,n1eo ost As much a. csar.eais 10 hi. Etf3 e
fsT:i1e Il his bEothfr and hts lsts1.i Nv VI:
NJ ~ l,;e a n, nife-" 70 ta!s sbc assented, 40.
, -! ItSaTrn;en vent 70 No 10 NaEestey p!sef
Were he Ead prssiousy tngaSsa poaa ~ aof ~,
set se.t.r a Nh s. Can--,he ladI ct ,ne hauso
xno a1tc1 theT were ": and ~ M.sea. -. 40
the dtterd1nt an.ssssa n aos arn 999a ~ ~
r.e xteEs: duf1rg I'll the t1ma the tfefen9a,
: ueated her - bis wiz. ataftssea nee ana spok
~ Ihe n.e:tpce Of having net with peeuutat
. fn.ers rdlcfd the Elsntl1 to 60 % nsa With be
| hlA EaIEGUAklH&3CE4 kHU<&kN lG1pEptt
! s.nre tEeu he hsa ahandoned aad tepadIase.3 he
y M en.trei1 neglected 70 provide for her or b.
! I mid s:ca wnz born htout Nay, ista Short
: | fefpre saaadln1n@ her be 1nt1ced ner to sigh
= naEcr drawn up By hlmsels, stating that no u q
. tide ceremony nad been performed het~te
tnen- Tie ttiencant Eas aiso e1am!fed - :.
p!tLcss snd ttss1tsd that he ZeyeS a9sted % tai
lie pIalnsi1 - his vile, but alleges leas u va
!, | screed that the ebou1d Lire with hin a. nts mt
tirss and That be thon.d pass her Oh as n!s Wlf
= | A.d ne 1.leCts that he g8re her rae Wedding no
: | 70 s. 10 decktre other people and not etcte Il
Eu4r.c.uc that .he WIS., nat hts wife, ~ he feaff
/. that ttey found cut tu the boarding hopss tai
l. they vere rot married They would turn then %
= There - ro prettnce up to the time Of the h1eGs
= marriage that thefc h1d been sny Illicit 1nte
I course betr cen tbs parties The testimony
Il The plaintiff y cUr1ptotsted BY Mra St Clair. 81
D | kepi the boarding houec, hy her s1ster au,l b
j. | nete, Who Tired there and Who prove xnAt b
Il fore con trR there To reside tho defendant e
Z | PaRet board for himself and wife Tint VIII
> there tEeJ Nsed together as Eusn and Wife t1ea
i IL & and sreakuG OF each otteT a such. Also
the test3mopy Of Nj. and Afa. stieat, Who test
q tkAt the defendant ASSURED toeu, iaaf 41shuui
= co ee1e1on< had been performed he had MARI
ii | the HaintlL and she ~as his vile AMI a1ttlel
= hear hA naEne, sd that II thty haA chilIs
ID | thty khood be entitled 70 beaT
IL Tame, and that they were ~ uu
Ean and wife ~ MI. and Mrs- Sues', Thpse m
Or risEe had been 20 o-ennfzct IN the Usual tor
1t | Ihefe csn be no doubt tEat tie testimony OF
A1 ! plAlnt!d proves 1n actual ard valid nAzrt5ze
I'd | txten The Elatnttn and 6efeudaut The ReVts
IL St&tpseS declare that " EkIgttYc1 20 IN - III