, 1869-04-22

SIS as damages. The second ended il a isniint
TOR plaintiff, with s.ta damages The assault,
hut 10: \ i. !. meal assault-the placing OF q CON
testan! L. .:ni the defendants ptemscl There
is bill l~,!,lte On the chancery side o1 The court
comt'aiants ut Law.
Ansnn II. Truesdel '. John C. Barton Ct al
Hiram Irdsall =. Peter Meyer. For sssl4a.
- MSen s$sa3 a. e. Miller ct nj, v Mathew roncele,
Thomas Smith '. Rock River Insurance Com
pany. For s3o7.49-
TIE K1S0sHCRY ESTATE
. Inis estate has 1nade f9rtAer progress toward
settlement 1t wns yesterday ordered that the re-
he Il Lac =;
guardian.
Superior Court.
Verdict WAS received In favor OF Samuel Flnlay
r John leancs, for tl61.11.
ceants, Damages laii Il 11o51oo. The calm Ia
this case Is upun aa open account for supplies,
etc, siAted 1t $9,SsA3a Tn trial
wAkRnor5K kECElPTs-TRAHsFER or PERSONAL
PROPERTY.
In TIC q Goa5 nna NHSss &c.,
l'a.nt,n q aealnst the three defendants lust
Iu this case there seems to have been q sale by
The defendants Of seventy-1yc barrels Of 1ouE 10
F. Smith / Company. This property was stored
while. the defendants found guilty replevicd o. an
allegation or fraud In the purchase.
IS sne tna tnr
house receipt to F. Smith 1 Company f0r the -four,
anu while such -FOUR was thus 10 store and held in
bafment, before demand under the warehouse re-
ccipt the hour was taken out by the Sheriff under
wit Of replerin, then no recovery could bc hal
against defendants. .- ...
IA q matter Of 1aw, the JURY was instructed
that, II party sells and delivers goods to another
though under such circumstances as would author
l.e a 1eclsten o1 the sale and a recovery Of the
goods as cranst the gtl1te, YET as between the
original veil'tOr aud to.tu Hlc purchaser OF the
fraudulent tendee the bo.d j L purchaser 1nl,t
i,ocent, Ire loss should fali upon thu party who
soil a,ld delivered to the fEsu.iuient purchaser,
Eoe he enables tile commission ul lhe frau,l by CIV
lts oesession Of The Goo,ls voluntarily given to
iii, b., the owners with the intention Of 4 sale
so, II the original vcnnr tonstnt to tue transfer
y properly, though sich consent be temporary
,Aly ans! ubtalllri by Irau'l, and therefore, re-
.oc:!blc a,st an Unfair purchaser, still III Inn
<:t purchaser frulu this last will BE- protected
,1,.ti.lst tlle lrst hu1cr.
Il: tits cn$e it Smith Company contr.cte,
tn purchase The hour iron Baker, A!tTo aud Dix
.n't there was delivery un'leT the contract whrn
:ssuith i company deposited tue lonr with stur-
,es 4 Mc-sfster. receiving warehouse rere!ft
shlcl receipt was deposited with plaintiff Is s:u-
!aIcral security fur /. luIH tts ntt len. cugslizan
,c:Ia,etl anil II tie money lnaletl IL still unpaid,
,hrn there SHOULD hc vcr,1ict for platnti1 with
.llilascs not TO cxcee the atnplHt OF sac.l loan'
er:sIsr, II ther took thu wArthoI>c recepss with
,rt knowledge o[ fraud used in obtaining the
4unr they represent tllrn thes stanl ID tile sainc
position "a lesna fir pnFcfIIsef1
LIBEL slit DISMISSED.
Charles Afc4A1etr Y. The pruprtcturs Of the Chi
c1gu Times uni Henry G: Rosin Action for libel.
thy s,, plea e |as,fa1G t,en ,s'S s si!
cited in the declaration; ls follows:
"A ES ~; ~ ~, mn. an MT ,~'a:~ m m t9 , rS: h,
p,l- cautioned .snint' man xlru, 3. sr.rs II
;i,: H. f ) jus!ier fr, Sothcra Srs Isrk sisrc. ~
HI liierf acknowledges. he we engaged in thr watch
II :3jas q ri Slnss aa r'pnin s
e. II !, ds TIT ne o ns "a 1T
r,sTsa; s!1snte liz then iiafrisi.rs: psn9.,
se"sa saly y i I'll IND nd 1T eh IT,, ehiss: iS T.
Sa;' II III "a ss' a
lpd H. + ~ II one r Ho1s fscs Il
,i.e Wei bvi.ion iir slsnscs hs saTdns j!ss very
.f.en: .nd tousc,nss lca7cs III uniad board hu Is
| JUDGEMENTS. ......
| LAZARUS SilyeF7nan 4 Go. V. John T. Me and
William CARPENTER. ~ confession, for slia.
| Nathan Esendrath and George ". Bettncer
Y. Hiram Kogcr+ By confession, for s22s.4a.
husl,an,l ct uls. Mechanics lien On verdict Tor Dc
Aiocrt c,app ct ais y. Henri Eaned and
a3,s'ies.
Catherine II. Mowlen ct al =. John Gilbert
iousth iractsonl qaaIter d seetlon =, s. l. east
4 Charlotte Quentin s. Chicago 4 Northwestern
Railway Company aud uthrrs In thj
case = riRht Of way was taken b,
Ito ,ne defendant aamesi The decd 70! pre;ss1
IL neu o. nn tneau1m ~ na.. ~ W Ess1. g.
way Has tAken n me nati4e III 1itllH SioaaE Wh
vas 1Ecn aIcsent o. ny roa' ann mnn; nelos ei,
tne Iart.s Netc SAetule,i, mAs ictHle4lan3 t Auts
~ tne ia upun LIZ ne'a VI y uasa.atg' -,
on Galh silee aee M nnpeaIs - rafi coetn ot a.
| northwest quarter u southwest quarter 81 Secno
80, 10, II, and this rcver1s I" complainant
,,>SI" NJ" SE1Ia r
r9a nanG!n Saio1M y ,aaA q, Sa4e u yonn
:. snlils1. n1ta.ises, Sl,iooG =, ox,.
same as n hIaneh at Inc STATE l'ans OF OHIO
same; nn Same IEa,h acto m, rm,n,,, 1,r,,sw,,v
El!z;l alltl Au::tistas j. L!flugstoh Asslinpsi
Dan:a&cs, aI, 3ahN ...
, ". r. wentworth v. y. '. GrnWn. Assnmps!
. DamnRcs 81 ~.
Sidney W. sen Ct o., =, john lIaaI!n- As,uml
st;. damages s2oN,.
John epcl!man. q Lt.cn CnNntE. rt n1. '. Ia
rick Ftz:efahi. I'LL lor PARTON Q! Lot 5, El"c
i'm iE's1ses Il 3 se1s sa''s'oh o' fractional Se
Christian koal!nx v August Mellus+ rttttlo
:"r partition ~ "..t " clatS. II lnls. ol lart
! Stetnn ~ un 1ne Town u Nneellue,, so11a
Northwestern Rntlr,h,l.
. ! nEskK1En MiFR @ ,,,,...,.
Alnssa l. CnatpSfian .;.i y. tst"n Cnamasf at
~. TOT .llvufce, on tne Sroun1 oE ueScI1t'l IL
:l!cfsn tnat tns pi11'cS WeIc nnls,aeM on t'se
as Oh H.!, 4s1o, oue Gn't T.; " m,s! ns'uS oo'n
is m ,rn H. tde ~ .vfnia mn9 rae,i. ,e
,fnsci"t1, nurean t9un!s' aesesteu Ills laa:l5 @
:, tle 1oth day OF MAY, 1s''F-
('onut, tnrrf.
r~tIp an or,lrr svss entered liking The a,,,o mi
/ The commissions Of the four executors and trIstee