Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-04-23


( defense.
SO Thos. A. Nelson, exr, VS. Marthi
! Trigg ct al Kortrecht & Craft for com
plainants and Estss * Jackson anC
| Wright & McKissick for defense.
/ ST. G. a. Stiilman VS. Vance, Ander
son ct 81 J. R. Robertson for complain
ant and Clapp, Vance Il Anderson for de
Tense.
s.. James Woods vs. G. D. Mclean ei
al CAN'T & Waddei for complainant
and AyFes & Randolph for defense.
66. Jas. E. Morrison vs Jno. Cannon ei
al w. G.. Rainey and S.ovaH for com
plainsnt and Wright & McKis5ick fol
defense.
81. G. A. StoekIey ct al vs. R. P. Bigby
ct sl; Scruggs & Rogers for cOmpla. .nants
and J, E. BgelOw for defense.
6S. Chspin ct al vs. BCOse ct 81 {; StOvall
& Fippin for eomplainants and Maldon
q Henry for defense.
50. John n. WaRgener vs. Partee &
Matthews; Kortrecht & Graft and Ran
dolph for plaintiff, and Clapp, Vance &
Anderson for defense.
20. F. B. Cranshsw VS. Wm. Watkins
ct al. HAlIum q MuIiigsn for plaintiff,
and Wilson & Beard fJT defense.
IL. John II. Wsggener vs r. A. Mont
gOmery ct al; Ayres d Randolph and
KOrtrecht & Craft for plaintiff, and Estes,
Jackson & McDavitt and Humes &
Poston for defense.
Y E II. Word, admir-, vs V. Morgan
ct al. Randolph & Rainey and Heiskell,
Scott Il Heiskell Tor plaintiff, and Brett,
Stephens d Smith for defense.
73 G. w. Dunsway VS. w. II. D Wen
dell Ayres q Randolph for plaintiff, and
~oL,- e E1a Aaf
"A. w. F. Hardin vs w. T. Avery ;
Williamson, Ayres and Randolph for
plaintiff, and Yerger and Beecher for de-
fense.
rs Jesse w. Page ct sl. VS. George H.
Monsarrat ct al Ciapp, Vance & An
ders1n for plaintiffs, ana Chalmers, Lse
& Wsrriner for defense.
rs. A. Vacearo ct al. VS. John Hen
dricks ct al. II. Clay King for plaintiff,
and John Bullock for defense.
II. Sarah T. Wynne vs James D.
Wynne et al. ; Humes and Scott for
plaintiff, and Stephens & Smith for de-
tense.
rs Mary n. Young vs. James Young
ct al Wright q McKissick for plaintiff
and HGmes, Scott, Smith d King, Ham
lin, Hart, C0rmack, McRse & flanagan
for defense.
70. Nancy Scot vs J. c. Johnson /;
Wright < Mckissick snd Heiskell for
plaintiff, Z ties, Jackson and ,McDaviLt
for defense.
50. W. s. Churchill ct al. vs. A. T..
Wells Wright - McKis issick for plain
tiff, Yerger, KOrtrecht, McDavitt and d.
@. Smith for defense.
81 Marcus J. Wright VS. Webb, Mitch
ell, ct al; NJ. D. Welsh for plaintiff,
Scott and n for defense.
81 Jacob Stsinkuhi vs. David Wicker
sham ct al; Stovall 6S FIippin for plain
utf, B secher q Bslcher, Ayres and Ran
dolph for defense.
So. A. D. WisherspOOn ct al. VS. n. NJ.
GrOsyenOr WrigdJ & BIcKissick for
plaintiff, Randolph, Finnie, Hames and
Scott for defense.
S4 J. Z Garter ct al. vs John w.
Jefferson ct al; Heiskell, Scott & Heis-
Kill for plaintiffs, Wright. NJ & w.
K0rtrecht Il Graft for defense.
SIS. Jane Cook vs. John I. SgayDe
Ayres Il Randolph for plaintiff, J. I.
) wayne, Morgan & flanagan for de-
tense.
S6 J. Polk VS. J. r. Kirkland ct al
Wright * McKissick for plaintiff, Smith,
htttridge, Hamlin and Randolph for
tefenss.
81. S. c. Gray vs T. P. Manning;
StOvsll and Flippin for plaintiff, Chal-
ners and Lea for defense.
IS. Patrick G. Meath VS. JOhn NJ. Craig
ct al; Estes, Jackson and McDsvitt for
plaintiff, d. Z. Mcdowell and McRae for
defense.
50. J. II. CTisph VS. Geo. w. Miller ct
81; K0rtfecht and McDavitt for plain
iii, b. M. Estes for defense.
so. John n. Goodwin va Franklin Ins.
Company Finley and Ksllar for plain
Lif, Heiskeli, Scott and Heiskell, and
Jsckson, Estes and McDAvi5t, for de-
Ienss.
81. Peter E. Bland VS. e. T. Rose, ct al
Yerger Kortrecht, King and Csruthers
or plaintiffs, Logwood, Heiskell and
Scott for defense.
81. E. NJ. Apperson VS. David @. Cross,
st al Estes and Jackson for Plaintiff,
dnmes, Scott, Brown sad L1oney for
ie1eDse.
80. VIM. NJ. Walt vs VIM. II. StOvsll,
1t al Clspp, Vance and Anderson for |
plaintiff Bsecher d Beicner for defense
81. J. n. Lee vs James NJ. Walt, snds
lanes NJ. Walt ct al. VS. w. NJ. Caldwell !
It al; Wright and McKissick for plain |
if, Estes and Jackson.
95 Wm. A. Hall vs. Sarah w. Fowlkes |
It al; @. A. Hanson for plaintiff, Nc
Henry, Stephens and Smith, and Scott |
md Heiskeli for defense.
SO. James h. Merrim8D vs. ]. @. Nor !
nan E.tes, Jackson and NcDzvitt for |
Dixon and Hough for deiense. |
81. G. Spence vs. e. Armour ct 81 /; |
and Hatcher for plaintiff, |
King and Randolph for defense.
98 [. b. Kirkland vs Mississippi and |
tennessee Railroad Company; Ayres, |
Calhoun and Randolph for plaintiff, |
JIapp, Vance and Anderson for defense. |
SO. Thomas A. Morrison VS. P. T. AL |
en- ct al, and Jseph Lowry ct al VS. P. |
[. Allen ct al; Ayers and Rudolph for |
Ciapp, Vance aud Anderson |
or defense.
100. Mary a. Robinson VS. John Park |
IT al; Humes and Scott for plaintiff, |
2siney and Randolph for defense.
l0l. Wiley b. Miller va John Il Speed |
It al; Wrigat and McI&issick for plain |
iff, smith and Kttridge for defense.
l02 William Clark VS. Sarah NJ Stan |
on ct al; Beecher for plaintiff, Smith |
md Kittridge for defense.
1O3 Patrick Cowan VS. ]. L. Chandler |
It al; D. S. Henry for plaintiff, Pierce |
or defense.
10I J StiIlheimer & Co. vs L. Samel- |
on ct al Randolph for plaintiff, Thomp- |
on, Frazier, Rainey and Graft for de-
ense.
1906 Frank NJ. Moore VS. Elizabeth |
Pope ct al Beecher and Beicher for |
Finley, Ksllar and Z. S. Ayrss |
or the defense.
l06 David w. Parish VS. Minor Merri- |
Weather Heiskell and HeiskelI for plain |
if, Clapp, Vance and Anderson for de-
ense.
107 Paul King ct 81 vs r L Smith |
4 al KOrtTecbt and Graft for plaintiffs, |
Wright and McKissick for the defense. !
l08 John Harbert VS. II. A. Jones ct al
Estes, Jackson and McDsvitt for plain |
iff Wright and Mex ssick for defense. !
100 Martha G. Kell VS. Ezekiel T. Ksli; |
McHenry, Hubbard and Heiskell for |
flanagan and Swayne for de-
ense.
no. John Overton vs. John 81. Holins. |
lale ct a. !; CAN'T, WaddeIl, Hsiskell, |
Scott and Heiskell for plaintiff, CoDde |
md Woodward, and Randolph for de. |
ense.
Ill w. w. Ritchie vs. n. II. Stsut ct |
H.; Gregory and King for plaintiffs, J. |
T. SwsYne for defense.
liz p. II. Handy VS. John Nelson OF |
H.: Haskell, Scott and Heiekell and |