The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1869-02-12

ono. nelly, mos. Is. SWartE.
y tShington Dorney,
Inc following cases have been disposed of
previous to our going to press
Ann Martins Administrator VS. Abraham
-sf"rtin action on the case entered agreed
ii. w. Archer for plaintiff Farnandis for
defendant
Abraham Martin VS.. Samuel Martin ac-
ton of trespass Q. G. F.. entered agreed
Farnandis for plaintiff, H. W. Archer for de-
PENDANT
T. A. & n. VS.. Hays VS.. James Madden
attachment on warrant; entered agreed
Farnandis for plaintiff, Fl. w. Archer, for
defendant.
Lampher, use of Smith, VS.. j. j. Ferguson;
action on the case; entered agreed. II. w.
q S. Archer for plaintiff, Farnandis for de-
PENDANT.
Zenas Hughes VS.. James Walker action
on the case; entered agreed. Farnandis for
plaintiff, II. w. Archer for defendant.
Smith and others vs. McVcy and Gottsrup;
attachment on judgment; entered agreed
Stump and $. Archer for plaintiffs, II. W.
Archer for defendant.
Marshall and wife VS.. John Timmons &C.
ton ON the case entered agreed Farnan-
dis for plaintiffs, II. w. Archer and Stump
for defendant.
James Johnson vs.. Cover and others ac-
ton on the case entered off under. the
rule. S. Archer for plaintiff, Farnandis for
defendants.
James S. Martin VS.. / J. Lamdin; action
on the case 4; off under plea to the jurisdiction
of the court. s. Arch4. for plaintiff, A. H.
Jarrett for defence.
Wakeman Briarly vs. j, \. Cover action
on the case entered abated. Cuttings for
plaintiff, y. H. Jarrett for defendant.
T. II. Morgan VS.. Andrew Cahoe action
on the case entered off II. w. Archer for
plaintiff, Stump for defendant.
It. II. Morgan VS.. ]. Amos entered Off
II. w. Archer for plaintiff. Stump for de-
PENDANT. .g.a o.
Harriet Garrett VS.. T. J. Ayres action on
the case abated. II. W. & S. Archer for
plaintiff Stump for defendant
L. G. Archer VS.. John Archer action ON
the case entered agreed. Stump for plain
tiff, Farnandis for defendant
Curry & Co. VS. W. Hall action on the
case Judgment by agreement. STREET. for
plaintiff, A. FL. Jarrett for defence.
Warfied and Allen VS.. Fl. Richardson nc.
ton on the case judgment by agreement.
II, W. Archer for plaintiff Farnandis for de-
PENDANT.
Aprhn Vn1,, ArnI
the case; entered agreed as per order filed.
Stump for plaintiff, Farnands for defendant.
W. Herman VS.. j. w. Bateman action On
the case judgment by default Maynadier
for plaintiff, no appearance for defence.
Benz. Cromwell vs. H. Lefevre action on
the case entered off without prejudice
Stump and Maynadier for plaintiff, H. W.
Archer, Galloway and Jarrett for defendant.
r. Holiday & Son VS.. J. Sewcll action
on the case judgment by agreement. Gill
bert for plaintiff S. Archer for defendant.
Land, Massman & Co. VS.. Z. A. Bodt &C.
ton on the case judgment by default. Gill
bert for plaintiffs, no appearance for defend
ant.
Land, Massman and Co. VS.. E. A. Bodt
action on the case; judgment by default
Gilbert for plaintiffs no appearance for de-
PENDANT.
J p. Waterman VS.. Lively and others ac-
ton on the case judgment by agreement.
Fl. w. Archer for plaintiff, proper person for
defendant
w. Lanahan & Son VS.. ]. j. Dawson &C
ton on the case judgment by default H.
W. Archer for plaintiff, no appearance for
defendant.
r. McConkey VS.. Kuks e Ncild action
on the case entered Off by order of plain
tifi's attorney. Farnandis for plaintiff, no
appearance for defendants.
J. Fl. Cochran VS.. T. J. Ives action on
the case entered off by order of plaintiffs
attorney. Hopkins for plaintiff, no appear
ance for defendant
John Mitchell, Jr., vs. S. Ii. Barrow; ac-
ton on the case judgment under the rule.
Hopkins for plaintiff, no appearance for de-
PENDANT.
James Neild VS.. Ell Nei!d; action on the
case; entered off by agreement. II. w. Ar
cher for plaintiff, Farnards for defendant
James Cook s. Co. VS.. G. W. GALLON :;
action on the case; judgment under the
rule. Hopkins for plaintiff, no appearance
for defendant.
c. w. Lee VS.. Loflin and others; action on
the case judgment under the rule. s.
Archer and Van Bibber for plaintiff, no ap-
pearance for defendants
Faust and Bro. vs.. A. Saucrland action
on the case Judgment on terms filed. Fer
nandis for plaintiff, Gilbert for defence.
Herman Stump vs.. J. r.. Street, and 9TH
ers action on tlic case judgment under the
rule Maynader tor plaintiff Street, for de-
PENDANT