New-York tribune., 1869-01-14
OWL.

In the Supreme Court, Special Term, the cues
ton What Is the liability OF one who recoininends
seryantq was Involved in the OF Hopkins agt.
Bulkey The plaintiffs complaint sets Iorl hat we oe-
PENDANTS had in their employ one luttman VINO stols
from them 81 OOO but they retained him after the dS
cOvery TO work out the amount OF ms tueI. lae 'ns
plaintiffs applied tbe defendants for Information of
his Character informing them that they needed some one
whom they could trust IL the manage meht 81 uelr oust
truth recommended Luttman that they took him on the
recommendation. and that he defrauded them OF several
| ants responsible for Luttman's mayersations.
The defendants do not STATE their story.
matter Of law even the OF the painta.
are true there H. legal claim arising 10 the paintns
against them. That recommendation OF peI,oh even
knowingly false does not render the rec0uenuer aDe
datioEs produced the Immediate transfer OF spscS pop
erty plaintiffs contend that II comes WITHIN ne
Which damage grows gives right OF action against d.
makers. The Court reserved its decision
In the U. s. Circuit Court the case of Daniel
Coffee came up. He is young man who ms already
served out term Of imprisonment Tor counteueiling
He was tried yesterday indictment charging lin
with having counterfeit money IN bis possession Win in
tent 10 pass the same The evidence showed that N
October last his father caused his arrest charge OF
being drunk and dlsorderly ON beng taken 70 me sa
found on his person, and were placed on me
desk In the stationIouse. He immediately seized them
back. lie found guilty and renanded Tor "a eu'etee.
Michael Mccormick, youth. indicted Tor counierelng
remanded Tor sentence Saturday The case OF
the L. s. ag Georse b. Davis in which the defendantf
/
Collector Bailey counsel for Davis applied Tor post
ponement for the term afdayts TO the effect tha A.
Canada were material witnesses for the defense aud
could show that Collector Bailey had been actively en-
prevent the latter from sayng HIM u5ayl pfosecnsu'
and giving him trouble The Court denied le alphe@
ton, but gave counsel time 20 put ~ new andal.
/ Charles Harper and Joseph Bansb0, alas taHa.
joe" indicted for counterieitlng, withdrew peas VI
| not guilty pleaded guilty, and were rchiahdeL
In the Supreme Court before Clerle +. Jy
aud auI Pam ri md flp
came yesterday. This - an appeal lgh ins "
der OF Judge Barnard permitting Sr Da as i,5c'&'grO &
the Olympic Theacr property TO lease IL 20 hs s0hI
law, Mr. Hayes. AT rent of $1,000 per anhunl s,1
days the was before the Court ana te 5foe
ease contained offers made after the argument n W 10
the decision OF the Court and submitted to INC 1s %
fore his decision. some Of these 9fefs W. J that
$4,000 per The respondent DhH e.IntI I - in
IS -, ~ 80 ~ he cerl, Judge Barnard having
refused 10 consider them not properly before i io
rautfs contended that the clerks eerncltr Nas oU
rnsye and that iu any event, the Court. IN leasing
nertv ronrh its receiver the benefit Of litelt
was bound 10 consider ali Information coming coming
Coprt ar.r Considering matter for night decided
n admit the offers udge Barnard pLoesMne M in' @ Vso
! came M again yesterday FOR rargulent On .io maj ha
,ion ur Thayer, for the plaintiu c!alheu tlat tn9
terms of the proposed lease, the low rent ~ 49,
with other offers and the near connection Oa 'S s Sae
with the lessor together proofs OF irS anu WA,
the mere fact that better rents Sor @ ,S ~ esnondents
ontCnded that the order was not appealaO.e OK; && az
peaabe that the merits the orieF Ms IN icasIns
rty @ but tho improvement OF the property ald tTs Tb
ns sideratious 10 It's entel on lIie lu-n'' ~
| Court reserved its decision 80 ~,
| In the Supreme Court. General Term, tne
rho people, dc. rel. The Society for TIE hslo,
a,,,n OF Juvenile Delinqucnts IN the Cliy OF Ne"io,
, Erancis Degner came up yesterday Tbs y an ~
saI brought by cerorar1 from order OF Judge Di
homr 10 determine question continually arls!hs ~ "
~" LEGALITY OF commitments the refOrmatories fran
era Degner the oause OF the proceeding. having been .
yloied of petit larceny, his commitment Was hue ou
follows: That the said Francis for the mlsdein'.p pa
aforesaid whereof he is convicted III appearing 10
Court that he Is under the age of l6 years. be sent 70
House OF Refuge there 10 be dealt Win seeys seys
ing to law" This commitment Judge D a.
bour held u DO void for indehnltehess
10 the period Of imprisonment, that sg. -,
period should have been within the statutory perou "
OF counsel for the Society, argued that IN TINS
Harbour was wrong That the House of kelhge Has .
a prson for punishment, but great charity ior Ieioh
ton That the purposes of the charity coua hel hpn
reached by "A simple sentence OF SIX monlns uetSlJ
there That the purpase and object OF ITS eorts ,bst
aud pre sclibod by the statute creating IL reqhu
the va grant and criminal children should be uhurI
charge for long periods OF tue IL was not Its
that tha acts unconstitutional ana .ne . %,d
ceralnly contemplated such power Ihls loW1,t
been repeatedly recognized by the Courts MI thst
Sutherland said II seemed to HIN somewhat s.hs
any mans child could be sent thore for years Tor rs
stealing iacknfe but no did not see what answer ,s,
was 10 M. Grams positions. Mr nan: Nno n" I've A
come In ms aNicus requested the Court % as
thorough examination and fill opinion on uS nanaya
the question WAS one which the recent ness ol hs yas
from the District Attorneys Oihce enabled hin o 3 lila
n source of constant tronbo there AZ he had u"
successor would also soon certify TO-