, 1869-07-28
BISHOP VS.. RECTOR.
Hearing Of the Motion to Dissolve
Mr. Chenev's Injunction.
4 Motion for a Continuance Made
and Denied.
Recltalk nnd Reviews of the
ELL md Auswcr,
ArEuments Of Measrs Jndd. Thomp-
non md Fuller.
rIOliNtNt. SESSION,

VD Inc COMING III VI t1E NlAuCEl1 UfNGCH OF #
l:uler1or Cpur .Ian5etonl, there had quite puu
Yer Of interested spectators gathered, IN anlc,p
lion Of The taAiug up Of The motion, made In b
fs.f of The rrcsoyterB called together 10 act Ii
Ecclesiastical Tour: Of the Protestant EpE.con
Church. defendants In the proceeding by 1njun,
tiaH. upon the complaint Of Rev. Charles
CmntT, Of Christ Church, to dissolve the thiont
non. he injunction IL temporary, Rran,cd upon I'll
trtrs ctflrr. a. court, continuing The hcxrln. I
thr raSr made arAtnrt LII. Cheney hT The pr.ssoi
t1s en;Im'tsionrd MR., oy lhe ntthor, Ia which he
tGAtEtd Will having violated the constitution {
thc thureh and his VOWS, taken upon the oceas,o
u Ills ordination,
nu17oH TO ros7rosE.
Mr. N. ". FULLER, for complainant Thpnrt,
h.1t sul'tilitksd UpaoI for n continuance o
,hc hrar:hr, or for a Temporary }p.: :poncnrtit
IT., Mnliru \. lastl upon ~ anlissit. Fnscrtpe'
uu.nlm.n. lriuE rendered ncrertary j!
unctnn m wa granted or At a'ou. .c tH i'm, ~ r.
srIt WAS tssurd Al The pauc time he de s;rct L
ta'sthc r'rh:. IT The cnn'p'anan' n,tslcr the IN
s!n n't'i'lri bill ",'1,ll t'c presented lu the cpur
.fi"rc mon on "wednesday.
1lr thru rrai the following Atldayit ,u sup,,or
ftr'unat't c<a". A<fril- ". FpIlrr and l.rnx dnl,
IT,: IT, ::.! ,s,; !s .s,i! H. 4
, t :s" ;".t,: !: .c -. IT,, h. =, q, sirt
."o-.o'r In ..'n,~t. s..t1-i II ib,. r.". ,.fi'r
~, It'll. .~t :t:1,,n @ 4. H.: l. y ,x. + r,
,!.'s ~ aut., r. u. nv !" .t,e t1rst. s!nr i !i
ID, i s'". '"as -" ~ ~" w. i"rs. ~ Il; Il.
III" t.. .';S. tx .s + ~ ,s: ,.n :, '1s 1s ~s.I
~ - .r.ri .d Il III, III IT,. :.
'a 1 s it I'D T. . =: : IT,. :,..s IT," ;ssItr:s .s 4 g,
,tn eft ,rIa r., RI ~, sa" tLHts:
" ,s@ NJ" 1., . ,,.si VIII, /, ., NJ, ": '%.t i
III. .'' ] ,n IT, ~. 'Ii" fur.,a .a""a "'
~ T r 5 -. .s.at :. 4" 'i"'f H. IL ", ....', ' |
e:,";' ~. ~. ,...w.tM* tr ltnsl .,i.i.e f'iIu-,
!,~'-! :. ",tu"n ttr j: jrn'.ni, s,iii ID III" m.t,
~ 1: u" IL i"1. i: IT, a., t: ~, T. s;
,;., r." - !" rn,1h't ,.Ia r,n.r.1n.n !. s"j!a,
insults. mi '.t ' IT, ~: III .'ss.t "' +, III ,.
;.%. - j.. =" ,flss y "1 '$ayi.".'" ~ =: /.
,.~n,. ]" IL t..s s.,nr Il liz t..ss. "i. iii III s
it"t" q" s.l e".r,r ~ Dir Ina t'al r4it s~<If,
'i"a, Jug t." @ stt. u z ""' i u" -:s:i a"s'
o." ,,, a., , n",s.nl ."t TIL s' 81 .t y. *,, L..
i',. ,, z %;s!. !;.'ST 4 H." .ns'l., r'I; l,"@t
!s'' M.i,r Il" nj, il a.mt,. /" .issiy 4 Ill Il.
IL. ~ H.; ~, ,,r ~ .,., A't.1 ~ nist ~ aHisH ,
Inch m tt... r. "ns ttnt, ftT IL a,:;iasu Il tu,.c
"iIt"s~s; lint th'e athAut has I.~n
t,f"r",.h hsfrtsf.fr ri ts15te, ultnt'sss III AtAl
rml, n ',t.s,sa; e.,.Aa.hsa III * ,!,,sie. . 81 III
Ut IT, III. ssn.'i'. N IT'LL. n. Il fst!a" I
h,,n:,. ia ~: ns .',r :. i nay h,'nf an.n
~ 1s'fn H., mr's5 , - nh@ & f. W. i"tfs Atn
y at.,rt.i III. hrt Iii ii tiu trrvrn,. .."ime ~
tlt""i su.a tains IL s;sei W ll.i.ot ~''4'"'
lie cited the court to the htR1ute providing hist
e.. Ia1 s g ,n ssu ,3'; s sous A4 H.
hts nlucsseh hi cal nntruhri II, ,hcn ,ne cnut
may continue the caee 10 The nrxt term. He dill
no', hnseser, ark 20 long \ postpou"nent, hut IN
dependent Of the statement Of the facts, be d.
t!tcd Sho5s Delay tU allow the Amendcu bill to Dc
lsfnEe the court
ut. v. Z. GUEDf, for defendants, waa rcady
court On the other question counsel desired 10
he heard.
The COURT ostsTuie,i The motion to continue
the hearing, the at1arit not specifying the names
OF the witnesses BY whom the TACT alleged can be
proved
4HEHpIESTa rKoroiEn. ..
Nj FULLER supposed the affidavit would apply
a. On uetloa I" delay until u supplemental lii
Eight lie hiFd-
T.e COURT dla not cnpcclse that the point
raised by tue tut Is material ~ the case now
zeAtes to The rurs1ts Of the case, which are cot
nov atfoIe ile Court
Mf. FULLER thought that owing to tbc cuuti-
fth Of the I!cal1ngf there might lr some tcct.ti.
cal dltEcu,tE discovered in the bi. wherefore he
would Ike 10 amend In advance. uc should ue!.se
the v hole case to be heard.
THE TINE FOR IT nor CoWE
The COURT th1Etm1 thct Inc defendants were
entitled 10 hearing On the I'LL o. stands So :ar
II an rot arpear 70 the Coart that the iotuuc-
:iou Is Atd1st2Lle- 1t had heeu granted IN frhd-
lEg OF the ILL, and II would nc 1oly for the Court
o.: iis own motion TO rrcete. F7lme Jactr the ID
lEuEt,on must Ire sustained: whcu it should nrpt,ar
1GAt IL could mo- tht.f tS,N IN
fer IN atnentDenL
~, ~ ] :. 6, !Enp 4E2itksses @ TIE COURT
motion On behalf oE Defendants to dissolve the III.
junction 1at- For Faut Of equity on The face OF
The hA e Epon the answer Of The respondents
md the AFFIDAVIT, nlcd with ii, OF bishop White
house. Lie conceived that the Injunction was
sEsut:d u Ien,lorars restrain, ts;carse Of The
EnlEu1on u the It'll concerning the Ecclesiastical
Court
The COURT suggested thai the Injunction wa,
a.uAe ed .linoui notice, 1nr tho renson ihat, per
Eais. II there was delay thc collrt cCclcsast1Cai
IilItr Ifoec-t lth such epcct that tac r9llts VI
eenp!ainaul lught be Irreludcea.
NJ: f.. ,,Ihl' u making th.a Inoton, represented.
he III Itecutrh The great 1,od5 OF the Erlsconal
Ch'.rch. nut only In ta1s oeesr, Iut ,iiruurbf,nt
Tire an1: Hot uaiy did he represent these. but In
o the G.lsIst. tpupc 1t The 5t;,It,lir i!,.cau4c.
II tEc chc:1,ur Lc e=!slbaile that t,u ;ribu.
EIH cl Ink rinrlllIe with pccitstasttrs! courts
a1i intt rfete with religious ll.r1t, nn with thu.
I"wcrs OF tcre-,a.:,cni COURTS The interest or III
~ n"apa1l"ns ~. "a y, ~. ts @ .'ue'.tu, -
~ t ~ -. .ha , t.eI 49,. ~ nta attltucns
- -" - a'te ~. .L'E ptt-o.tc1 u
~ ."s-.a't ttrt npAL Lla1eu lH4t te u Ettaor
- "!s. tnai tsias iA4t clQ1tf'' "tcH Ac CAne
~ II, neN!Nltu nhlJ acttn coan'l1I'cants, with
? nj congregation ahu church properly not to
cAcctu INC &!ae Gl xl,ho0. Ills lhcteuse Is then
aft7i, htH ing u tafEe ronRrtGAfiol. many COM
[Hnhlcaats ouu Falban!e prcpcftf. Ilo could mol
rnHrttFe tle futI1Ec OF h1k hFGrncHt- 1t tGiHlnt-
'h hit:i IT the tA1c:tFe Vi Judge I11rf.ie upon
INT ~ IN aIenhirnt n' nemhef nI ihc bar Ia
u III III t.Ir eth Nh, ttr nwtt hnrn tns hnrr 1t.,1t
rff f.. ,nw1.i Il coufd tre,t.r nat,,,h, " w.