, 1869-05-11
STATE Am HAIIoHAL Iup1c1ARY

ku' auo tnat -no eiA a't LUG
Legislature "As uneono@lo'lonu' 1nae
case was taken 10 inc supreme coof1 OF
Iowa. which Court afhrmed TIC validity OF
tne noaas' ana tae oons'soe'ona.ls o1 tne
act OF inc Aee1sia'o1e. !ne oonos were 's-
hued and PISSED INTO the hands OF non'resl-
dent pufcnasera. Ihls wns IN 1858. In
ls." anotnef oh! was med lot review OF
u .os oec,e.on, anu IN le's, ionr years atter
Tue 1e8anty o1 Inc oonos haa Deen hfnrmed
BY the supreme Court OF Iowa, the
Ea1ne Court reviewed and ovet1uled its
own decision and de.;ded the other uav
=. Ns N'
i;a;t1 E ~ thasa ~ athaz honas - - ~ 49, n' ,;t
- '.tooo o." ".NeA oouo7 ~ 'ue LAC
character issued BY several Iowa counties,
came oeiofe tne oupfeme Couft OF tne
5sr;s;o, ~ n. sn1~.,,,a con,t ~ ~. 40 ~
ueeAloa oa LIE ouPzc13e Aouft u Iowa ~ 70
the INTERPRETATION OF The Constitution of
~ e,...t n-, :.
however. have ueve. mid the interest. and
80 -, - t~~.,s4 -
new SUITS nave been bsonRhf by the holders
" 1a0 uoau, ~. A1o Anoan' ooe' .no 10"
fence is that the Courts Of lowA having
.honoo3 ths;ron;r;o,, tba arn..,,a c,,-t II
81 enAngea 'aen opmon. ,ne e1plene cou1s o1
~ ~ ,1..'NoN"% 49, .s,o "%rN".A-.. s4- " na
A D =. s'-' - " 49,
6',n
'.' ~s~4A0. ~ oo'' " ." "'aaa 70
e1su o1,oe tne sl.4e "nen VIC ,oNA ea-
fss fsss-.e sNrs.". . - - 80 ~
A- ~, - 49,
~ Wisconsin 7.aa.1 easo - ~ = ustsu ns a., euu-
io"f' oonsAes' t'ne1nea .ae ae' ios tue re-
A.'sA. " >sss'e A'o.u ''7 ~''"'s ~ AAe eael-
a. ,sTsa.@, ~ Po ,,. =. e6-
amer hc brought in any stxte Court II ahci there
es M , pSMesn a 1zen o. fne M ststs ~
staie, md the matter Ii dispute exceeds the snm
ne nss ~ sSso1 s,ts o. &c oest suss
plaintiff Or defendant Il he viii make aud de, ii
aaea ~ 20 ds an aNa & I'M. as H.
OF local tnnuencc, he viii not BE- able to Obtain
Hnot III II III sn e ~ esstioS XII n
such State Court for the removal o. the snls
~ bei IN the 1,stt4ct Vnere ,ea se sut nenoG
'.e. And i shall Be. thc!enpon, TIE duty q
no further ID he suit: the s1lt shaii then
On the untsd ssasts @ cogs1 n58sesa u Il the sams
process
). 9. Akerly, nonresident, brought
suit IN is6o. IN tie Circuit Court OF Dane
County, WISCONSIN, to toreclose mort
gage 1ne defence mterposed counter
CLAIMS 1he plathtln aemafzeds And rae
cou1t oserfoled tue demurrer. me caose
was taken 10 tne eopfeme cooit Oh "'seon-
~ sn' anu 'na' coars sossa'aeo 1ne demurrer.
Ane eAhe "as ttlea' hea'n tesAsene Ii ae-
cree Tor Inc defendant. Inns decree the
o'ase supreme coor SET aa,oe' ana re-
a.Ee nlan'lea 'ne ca'e' Ane .nfu neai@s re,
ouiA'o u d !uae"eu' t'f 'ue p'Atn'in, alo
upon appeal uls was a'so REVERSED anu tne
cause femanaea tos TURNER proceedings N
eoai ios'la'S "'ln toe aeTelai Juosmeats oi
'ne out'fens eoatI a. oan7 a'Aee '"e
pA'nt1n, 7salnne nla'eeu u Iuis ac' u oon"
s5ess' lieu u1s ainon'l'' ooaos ano o'uel
| !%i.efs LOT toe removal o. D. tne cause 10 ene
| ol'ea e'A'e' ooot,s. =, AAe Daae ooun1'
e'ou' oouf. :, ,l1Au' 'ne o'oel ~ 'u.'' eiee''
"ne1eupon Tue .fansie' "as n'Aue' ine
ae'onean' appea.eo .6"na ene olue1 0. ths
pane eoq11 10 me supreme coaf. a. tne
osa". ID tne "eannne tne on''eo s,'a'es
Court haa assumed 1uf7sdct1on' end nad
delivered an oPlniou that the cause was
nghuuls transferred to that Court. upon
the heels OF thus OPINION Is that ol .ne
supreme coot' o' WISCONSIN, IN WHICH soa'
et1ounaa oec'aeS;
!. ihas IN appeal from the order oi th'
Dane Circuit Court, removing the cause,
aFtopeI ptoceealne ol WINCH LIE sa'o su
p'e"e eo't. nas ]u1,ss.caon'
:. 1nae tae oesesat Jooetnenta Eenaefet
by That Court upon appeals were tina
hearings npon the matters presented .,
saeh appeals tna5 Inc sesesa' po'nts so oe
clded we're finally disposed OF, and oonl'
not I've arain ediut,;catea- ami tha ,1ainti.
49, -
ala o1,suus m'a. "e.. .,," Do'.a a:osu, .s.ss H.
o. A'' "nae1 s"eso utAo."ee''' ~
case had gone too far to admit its REMOVE
: to the Fede1a Courts, and therefore the OF
, der for the removal is set aside, aud th
: case continues in the State Court
l. That while tlis .]is,,ases of the matte
,,efora the C.urt for dec,s;on- and rende,
!, it unnecessa1y to pass upou the Question
:, vhot1,er it il oo,nnetent for conoress 4
antho1xa a non.res;aent n1a;nt;f Who h,
vo,untar;1v hrouobt b,a snit in State o,,u,
to obtain n removal after he has tested tb
= raae hefo,o said co,r+ 1o,h r,,on tha In,
49, ..s wv. "tA ,4A' -
9 anu Tue lac's' AA allncult u sno" ~ VII
Court to acSuue oripinal iur;sd;ct;o
, through the process and proceedings Of
- State Cont 11nt,, the nassaoa of tb,s ,c
;. tha r;pht nf remova, wa conf;nad IN no
v resident defendants, who were required