The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1869-01-20
stock Quotations by Telegraph p. M
Glendinnlne, Davis & Co. report through their
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.
The TriaI of syrs, Twi.cbeu.


For additional Legal Intelligence see FirS, Page
Andrew English was not disqualified, and
was accepted as a juror.
Ostin Wilcox was challenged because ofopin-
Henry Graham was challenged because of
Jonathan Glazier was challenged because of
opinion
John Hunter was challenged because of scru.
William l.. Pullet was challenged because of
simon Thatcher was challenged because of
scruples.
David Borlne was not disqualified. and was
accepted.
Robert Cornelius was challenged because of
scTuples.
william Cinnamon was challenged because
of opinion.
Charles Michael was challenged because of
William Geiger was challenged because of
scruples.
Bernard Rapp was challenged because of
g. Ehrenhe,mer was not disqualified. and
John w. Swain had formed an opinion, but
at the present time had none, aud not being
otherwise disqualified was accepted.
Thomas Ryan was challenged because Of
Louis Lilerwas challenged because of con-
David b. Thomas was challenged because of
scrnples
William Ransom was challenged because OF
William E. Bechtel was not disqualified by
either scruple or opinion, and was accepted,
making the twelfth juror selected.
Conrad Michael. already chosen, was chal-
lenged peremptorily by the Common wealth,
William Norman called-Was challenged by
the commonwealth on the ground that ne was
Samuel Memo was challenged because OF
opinion.
Milton B. Madeira was challenged because of
opinion.
Henry ]. Hansen was challenged because Of
Michael Lynn was not disqualified by opinion
or scruple ard was accepted,
The Commonwealth here challenged peremp-
torily Fernando Woodington.
Joseph Bailey called, was challenged because
OF opinion.
Julius Herman was not disqualified and was
Wiliifm m e Bechtel was here challenged per-
emptOrlly by the defense.
Conrad KitChner called, was challenged be-
cause Of conscientious scruples against capital
punishment
John Q. Kirwin was challenged because of
scruples.
Samuel J. Mcmillan was challenged because
Henry Lehman was challenged because of
scruples against capital punishment generally,
but particularly In this case.
Leonard MisR was not disqualified by opinion
or scrup es, and was challenged peremptcrily
John Steinmetz was challenged because of his
opinion.
Daniel McGllnsey was Cnallenseu because OF
scruples
j. b. Ireden was challenged because OF scru.
pies agsips ST the death puni> >hmenk
William McKnt Ass was challenged because of
his pre- conceived opinion as to the guilt or in
nCCenc6 OF t0e prisoner -
Robert A. Brown was challenged because OF
his opinion.
Alexander McIaumen was challenged be-
cause OF an opinion he formed during the trial
of MIR. TWitchell.
Daniel Macarthur said he had no scruples. and
at present had no opinion, but he feared his
health would not permit him to act as juror;
| il he were to serve he would have to drink
liquor whenever he had an attack of his COM
plaint, asthma. However. he was not chal-
lenged, and took his seat in the box.
Michael Lynn, already chosen. was here
challenged peremptorly by the defense.
j. p. heilig called, was challenged because of
scrn pies.
ares c. Bullock was challenged because OF
scTuples.
Louis Fay was challenged because of his
opinion.
Frederick Lauer was challenged because of
o. iniop.
Levi Miller was challenged because of his
opinion.
Frederick Maui was challenged because of
scTuples
Thomas Wylie was not disqualified by scruple
or opinion and was accepted.
Here the Court took recess OF an hour and