New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1869-12-11
THE COURTS.
guPREME CoURT-srrc1AL TERN

Before Mr.. Justice McCann-A new phase Of
he dipOroe 9tesiiOn-MGrgdrd Black agt. Samuel n.
Biack-The plaintiff, last Spring. procured a divorce
decree in that suit no provision was made Tor amony
there having been some KIND OF arraSenent oy "v ~
was omitted. Anerward the VIE moved on paper,
setting out that she had originally desired divorce only
a mensaA ct thoro, deceived by her attorney VIM.
j. Fisher, who Is known for his connection with the
Dalzel case, into signing complaint Tor absolute 70
knowingly that Fisher was IN c0huslo win heI ~
band that being advised OF her rights she agreed 10
take 500 and her clothes In lieu OF all amony but tt
she had never got the money or clothes anu nau pTS
sick and destitute FOR an allowance OF alnohy Inc
defendant, without denying all the adaNts, tUoh ue
ground that am0ny could not be allowed MI'n9u ope
ing up the case by proceeding in the nature OF VIII Oh
sSbSeSaenty the COURT fixed the amony at
e. per week with $50 counsel fee. A writ
Of ne Great also issued and The defendant arrested
The case now comes ny on motion 3y sno nuspanu ~
have the writ of ne ered set ASIDE and the order Tor an
mOny His aidavits aver that she was quar-
rcsOme, unatentiye wife; that before inc divorce she
frequently expressed her wish for that she mght marry
who had been imprisoned; that TINS eagerhesh III
duced her opush on the divorce ana tat she aRieG TO
60 which she received and rccepted IO III lu
only on failing To do did seek for almony that he
net Fisher but once before the SUIT was com
menCed. and was not IN colusion with nun; thh II se
sick 1t from her lcentOus habits and that ne
was too poor man to pay so much almony Inls Is
supported in part by afhdavits OF several persons
She presents her affidavit IN repy. she says that
she induced to marry him when she was Dnif being
ton that he commenced beating her very soon after
their marriage that her lack Of attention 10 him
business is amply profitable II attended to that her
from lack OF food clothing, and necessa-
ries her husband should have supplied her with that
she & an apprentice 20 the Womans Printing Society,
and scarcely enough now 10 get along, with some
little assistance from her brother that the only lmps-
Oned men she had known her husband ana her Tor
mer lawyer and that she has been unable 10 pay any
LAWYER her present lawyer having been appointed by
Judge IOew proceeding size took 10 get her CLOTHES
which failed through her homage. The Court took the
papers, reserving its decision.
Before Mr. Justice McCUHH The Bininger CdSe-A bra
ham CLARK agt. The Bank Of America aud Abraham BIN
iHger-On the 3Oth Of November injunction was
this suit restraining the prosecution Of proceed
iugs in bankruptcy AGAINST the firm OF Bunger 60. II
has already published in THE TBIBU Ne that con
ct arose for the possession Of the assets OF the hrm be-
tween the Receiver appointed by the superior Court and
the Narshals OF the United States Court The came
no yesterday a motion 10 punish defendants aud
in Mr.. Binnger's store for collusion IN
eyading the order of injunction. The defend
ant Bninger presented affidavit clearly and
explicitly denying all collision and all attempt 10 eyade
the order He denied that he had ever received any
summons or complaint this action. Mcssrs. Osborn,
Clifford and Duncan. who also charged with con
tempt also denied explicitly any collision attempt TO
came TO the possession Of the keys The reIator bon
read proceedings In the United States Courts TO
contradict the statement that they were not ia oosloh
with MI BniDgeT. Time then given 10 the respond
euts to this new matter. Tyler, compton ana
Parsons for REALTORS Mr. Titus for respondent binln
ger; Nj Bangs for other respondents