, 1869-08-11

L.xf xfh.Ir5si-Wia IN. L. Moss, JE., of Chicago.
Circnit Court.
NEW sC1TH
FfrdeItck E1ns s. J0hu Shoemaker, Charles S,
Quinn ana James Halllgan. TresIAsa Damages
lad At s.tyJ.
superior t:ouH.
NEW bClTS-
National Loan Aud Trust Company :. William
+. UeWeIf. Assumpsst. lwu3uA, taNO,
Edmund +. MHen r. Isaxc y. uar1tln. case
I.slnsgee lai.1 81 ssii04,0.
SAl,uuai Loan and Trust COMPANY '. Chauncey
N. Silman. -AsGumpsIL Demand, $3,ov0.
REAL ESTATE
=. 7. O'Connor =. .ameA IL ScoEillc ct ais In.
Junction TO Restrain the EXECUTION Of a witt 1f
restitution fur the premises No. 80 Wesi Lake
William and Elizabeth II. Bracket y. salomon
L. suIlrh It ais Hill TO scrrtu lat Nv t:xttpt 40
II ct p tue west 1U0 lce} o! lIt0ck 49, fractional
Section Is Addition. frumtmoHgaxe sale.
ItecorLrf's court.
kEw SUIT.
Bernard God-tein '. Charles 0. AcLlne and
GeuEEc A. fol!ansptt. TrrspAaA Damages lali
ri II ,Uuu. ....
Charles ". Burnham v. Harriet J. Duruhan-
Proceeding TOR tt!vurce. These parties we're
Iorf, and 1heJ nsrr ,we children, girl, oue
Eora 1ie.e, and boy. tirnr-e firnr!, the boy be-
tlR the edrf 1t Ia Charged that Tie wife COLL
United alullery with one L +. illbb.Ad durtu.
4 sECnkp Ar1Eurr
Anna Thlln.Gnt '. chnstupheE ThllmoNt I'LL
tUt VOICE, THIS III the stCupu attempt OF the
e0lnrn9uAut 10 TtlcAAe herself from the boIIs Df
nIatiinUny. The ursi btIl filed IN tnla court
III January !a,l and dls1ibeed. when 1us p1eAilnKs
we're all IN, 81 lire MArcn TERM. In The present
proceeding the complainant hiutes shat she was
HsE.'sa # q tg s1.'is ty 'sisIt Children t:lus ssace br
10 thcID, ef which Only ttG art hlSe-tHo buys Of
me ages, respectively Of IL an'i Jcar-. II Is
charged thA, the husband hs5 been guilty u
frequent 8cts Of crle'ty, hy striking An ., kt:K-
luR: b> verbal abuse aui bY tie application
Vi cprFuIEtpCs tpthcts, As veil ~ VI tcachis the
states her aEe; saving tnnt she h1s PASSED. :3
year, and atfds that she Is ID feeble health, pros
traied by latur expended 10 lehat Of dcfenIauL
II Il also alleged nat rAffy Ii Oct"aer Ut ISIS The
Iticttiaut alau'inued ttlrr no1nt, en1lniug say
L't!l Innu1ry, "fri, Hi. having Hlrd a hi41 for
divorce, fe r.saruci, as she te!lcs's fnr the pu1
Iuae IT abusing her Alr}ut that tltlr he Caused
parties to Gull upon her TO dIss iaie her from f'rus
tcutiuE ltE eatsc IN couri, Ritcsnx that
tLe would eertary l,e Insuecessful, inas.
Is Alaf, ACCUSED TT hay1ig Intercepted the letters
rhr'l, hrr lrg1i tiEt.t r. srnt 10 itr. SHnc cEhat
f,eh,etleh .'y !h,s ana relying uron promises Of
future gUtaI conduct x!,g COutf0tel tho Offences
of Which she ntt tIcsrttue cutnrlatHt1e. null re-
ctlftt! agAiD her husband und tllsT1ssed her suit
tF,r kays tat duIng the following eight ia. There
WIS q renewal tnrunrrutI, u tho kInttncsA Of
rariv alIccttEn, h1li on tho ninth daf thr latent
t.tsnAe GEuke OIL IN renewal VI cruElty
Nhlch cuulinated IN tuch acts that Nar wis colu-
,,-Igtl 10 leave hcr hone aud seeA safety In tbs
house Uf a friend. The defendant Is aa!d tn be
~ur1h shout 5J.tE0. the re.t Ut their int eirn
'.ps, aud the pront n money which nac hronyut Is
rr To tllr nafrtaEr fra-L ......
When thu former I'LL WA tiled, the husband In
t"fY-'et.d I'LL antwcT INT tiled 4 cr"++ tn. ~
JHtse. deuJ1hG Ill Alitga'lohs OF cTaelty HH htH
t..t, te AEtrrs. t;Ht tlt hai never struck A WlIe
except when she had III treated AlH- He
uiro deE!cd that Ills ~lfe WIS feeble, or s'.tkcu
,lo~n l.y work. Or That liz haA deserted her. hut
stntlrR ttAi hc MIA conlrc,i. nj titnce. to lcaFr
'e1 III Fcsiupt 10 The call u hta business or nt',
.1Ee nI hrr furious otRnuGhta- lir Expressed
The hrlirl ihnt Ghc II Mt subject fnr tae Insane
Asylum. In tlr cnttst he charged htE With tue
sanitual ari iatrtErrrutc Use VI Intoxicating
1huEN tfut.s! that she at! hruken int1 his hl1eau
Lid stolen hin itgH, 0tlu alleged thlt sne ~
trn pst..1 to poison flltIl.