, 1869-05-15

ma u,ln IN his own ONCE. Tint he had acted
II',s smsTT * one q hs counsel Il insolun;aTy
rrpred cut that he replaced the plsto! IN tne II
esk; II ht lid 70 he rnukt bare ta2cn Il lnefe " "
v:,, 50 thst he took number Of steps 70 | o.
eaci 4: having It went to the door aud returned
r. rs r1:ce telling hts cietx hat disposltlon 70
als 4 + .fs ee sa e a. H. a Weu s @
ave considered his oEn defence to have required
uch rnujcct! h
,r Kohte supported hts theory Of the case He +,
hnuett nothing Of the dead or dying nsn HnuL =
'Te .nfe x,s s>ssa ss nm bow ne cane to DO It
iii no: reply then that he Aaot IN seA.oe1euGs
Ut that she man had aoE1aSasea LIN. tMhe Me
htrrT that the shooting was done In rage and no!
i, reason Of iecesaitY. Hefe the counsel qnotea
'o NV Teri poT g snGw 'aM and aasn sns4
rar1r,stti III the New Yuzk case, that before ne
ancs al further cu1lts.ci II snch he possible. Ia
tnis {. &c. PRISON. : counsel made rue ISSUE INA.
the ac: was murder outright o. astlnahe. M n!sa1 Aaa
i,re,ncd.tation therefore an !pgredieat .! tne
crime charged. lie cited authorities io
tad nn, ,ne:aas saSs, N tneasa
thEt the evidence In this Gaze sho"ed even eoo1
lie further argued thai the position Of tho pat
lies was such Us t., preclude the Idea Of weil- !
grounded fear Vi imminent danger 10 LIE anu
Nr, Reed then rcfvzyed TO tho statements Of the
ecycrN Witnesses On the part Of Lite defence, G1v'
as then 81 cFs Or lnsSafEn ~ 10 sh sSh ms rns
it on tue part ii persons who earn their daily
bread tl,roueh employment In The shop o. dstea-
Ta!l vito although She hat. known deceased
In H. chil,lhosd merely visited him ron
sud 70 fbc conaiuct q, Mcvey's ielow-worIncn,
reisrse, 70 'seir la.o1 it .asy should =, lose !,
F;oke Of the conduct Of hts witness, Murphy who,
lxlnE f.ut 4 shop assoctate Of the deceased, saw
taoTe1 a m 70 % h his srs9e n ett tSe saoD esi
be. at some tutur- time, shoutt become victim
to ilee OPPRESSION e., ~ ~, ,,,sr .,ds ,b.t tne
IA ~: ,nsy dest,sa to ~ nsre sonssa a1
WI WI Justice lie thought tsa1 the 1ury should de-
nominate this ctisae hy ita right name aud IL
ruulA mad him guilt. Of murder, IS they ought, Or
guilty of rnanslaughter, and they could az the
snss s9s et 1t es o y g. 81 81 ay n
nun,l,cr Of Years during his natural ufe
The counsel then tu"k his seat, ami the lurr
were called upon to r7*e and hear me
INSTRUCTIONS FUR TEE PEOPLE
For The people. the Court instructed the jury as
Mu,arr ia The uni. wful killing Of human being in
The ewes II hs s,re with n'ace "sosstho'sh'' ash1
: Exr:e.s .aasr is ,t.s deliberate Intention unl.w
wsth { nj if y I cstensl nj esnsSe
Msrr II af,s,,t"ust.t .hAil b. implied wh-a no
ride: All ,rovs<.tirn ly=sz. where ali thu csrc.nl
.:snecr Lr Killing abandoned md malignant
The Co,t ln,ts.. the Jury ,hs, jastifsablc ho nj.
A:t Il re = sc j % pror % n
& . Ia 'sssi S. liz 'ss
at u 's's : .end "a sass.Sos
Il. I tn H. S @ ~ i ~ iii!
"'A = en- !" NY !. & .s 81 pe.na .1sE
IT, :s: Ss;s
r. IN . H.. .nS s, to .,et III
ste 'E." IT, ;,, H. ;1 III . raIsy s'hS t ~ ssi ~
sse .6ftr Il, ". 4 ' III a7r; T. Id II 9; 'n
1s, 1T Il: i, y IT, IT, Ir If IL as q ts &C. e. rs
ssi sS';s, N H. g.; II; II;
t ::sss!' yi ,.iar'h j: y S;s tissa -
at: II; & :s g " T. II, IS +,
I M i, sss aa,Ts as h i h Il, II: s + ss
load. pi..l revolver aud del;eEatsiy dlt
ate .het. III 'ulenac: i1e thc as, |. ilre
rea m IT. tn, Il !. @ s'fsf i s as
w 5ih Il " fse
e hsi 1tens eueh Fferu'upsots have een seeussr
+ f f. ee:'f r. M S., S. ene lie ., Ess 6 s
f. * = 1s r. = si.i IL IL faasa md
Ih ca5t 1e. s sy Int =
~ /. e sefae he Z sd
Il i lie jais slss le,1,vc from shs eviaeae:; II,
ssnasn % e.. .a a.sra.ei had ai.eoi aaed y. atsenap
1Sy s .: t. I'd IN ,asn
's :. III: X fs iss a:d 'L.s IT. ia astssa:at ia
n,sxiisss asnsts ta IT, IT, er sss. Sedy hssas sro
, II. q Ss:a: ' II I'll a nc s,' e
H.. :. Is IT, u ' ,< ,s ssassa; .na e { .ss
S :s 1s ,Ds'. saeA 'As ss',s4 .s.. 49,, .s, y,
Tc Coa;I in-t5tc;s TT s ,",S T. ia.t shsE y.
syt ss.y at s" s, 'ss! sslese s,den
sss AZ IL r ssa; ta; i A.
mn;t e.se!n,!ns wh. d. pan!;hTcat .s.l y !,
@ 4 L !at h" b c M :s' hes e
na@ L n; nnmSes i 7cs. sad may BE- lii aasu
t''H rssrnrc.,oss ron The DEFENCE
,o1he The instructions for The defence we're as f
losf Il. car. intrnes. The Burv th... nle.. they
e. StTsv ,s T. 1nf s ts e. s
7"i III: Ind III ID dsstna.at uron tss sasfse
M as e: *y* 's" 10 T. ssssa = 81:
st: ne t sns IT,: M
uS~~.1y lt-defcEer. when th5ea;sncd r. e. " tae
s s,s n .5s 70. s's sias r.aes
fGAt31ttrd tf1A1 ne II EMILY S tAasu
- lEr Gt'itt in+tFucts tke jury thft- lln!tts the!
tntE- n!e:mcnt sllrEEd l.yona AaJ tcaseaasA" dou
lay stsht - hnd for ttt deft ndaut ,.
$. III C"rst lnstrae:s the Jury that IN ~ tftnn
7Ea fartt~';lar1y IN th: chts o. nlnrcef, tnH
+,s, w. -. ~ lhM the cefrnaah y tnnoeraI @ amM I. -
$ s;s' f' 81 sadSs s"'ssa Sd ss;z
:'1. ':ei Is :ls lsat,'s, rs ~.s ,a,t tue:e must
Ii E lTet E'ren b foTr Arnnrtet,on cH,td b b
u ~, ~ =. srs st.e1aaal> hypothesis. conFtsseHt ;.
-, r. thr esA t:r uatrrnct Of ihc defend
tfat thra fhsrr could be eoarei
sar f'lls t1*!a srsel1ct thu eFidebcc with
t, ~ t1eEa. NJ - Ei.cc at :rthonkat bcu<
Wy nsnr a. AssAMlt '{ tee defendant and the1r
IT, Entn1 ~ W.; u y ffr t!:f ke would rtertu
ts st Aaa @ .s1ft s"i.i' t.'nry nu him. md
Il l. txrn:h. ... Ana IT, ts4lsSe and Il {
~ a--v II The I'M H. ~ ii, a'c e''eeact tora
{ tstEre 4. Irsta.,,. of ~ a,ne- n4rs .,, i
ra:necr.ucs 81 r.. @ = i, .s ,an1rs 49, H.
~. iixt IL rrT-ent no tast tnf,hSinr Ttm ~
@Ess4:r gTs n.er. il srs.ii.hed ~ assr, y
!! Were th- l.fcIcc o! ~ .iea:inn is vi Il; :,s ,
Ann ~ RI ,r,.1r fir ~. 1T Ii Tnat? hy III s..,,
II, -. {nncr.,,. insutT, erd
.,,x .,,.,. rrcc,.der the trstin,Scnx ~,
it .b-. sh.+ H.Vr, m.a- ~ as..l.
-, - q -, ,,,,x...s,n ~ - r.,sr IN s
1"fs hftexes! DcE1nt WA assaulted ny ueceHaea 10
aTr AT tHdGee n rta' ln.hie q "a @etei"at ~
t .aa, III r. =. ~ as1eff o tasssinS fsAa -
1ia sia ~ Asttns ha1ct shst oeHtt y ~ IT,
9ra. ,s,iic q, ~ ~ = T. ~ tg MT =. q
viz. ssTe Aimelf " ta' 'es1e -nat hc eo"'4 a'' -
Ia rti..n ~ ~ the ;u7@ i. .hr iudse of t,ott