, 1869-06-10

t4i
rrouuu Of SHADOW Of ground Tor said charges II
lie tsys hat for year or Two past he hxd diseoy.
cred disposition IN complainant to court the So
c!esy Of Other AND strange men, and that for the
Izst year OF two she had carried on secret aod |
an amor1ce correspondence NTH several strange
nfs and hlatdtsasnents of otter nea sae hid
become esIangcd from him, aud docs no,
;s:.sa q snoJ h. ..siest, eoas,denng nm N
with other men; " hereforc she desires to be rid
cf him, and has trumpeN n? the charxe m,ie Ia
M a. ao5S t5s tenn n g. sef
n. ms We. but that hAs,ng recently lost ~ ~
eronSry. y n nnsuceessinl Investment IL the
wants to be rid Of nun lie charges that She vas
e sa
Ing under the snoxledge Of ono Of these nocturnal
81 ncs impIoprieiy Of conduct. Dc ets her. ts1'ug
With him some Of the articles Of Adornnent
r. SseA se,as. as n2a 4. tqRRss nst ~hta
pre1exr for IhA proceeding. lie atates that for
The sake OF his child he haa rendered TO his vile
iasss i've win him. saying that she nas ceased
to love hin
William Maier =. neputlic Insurance Company
Charles g. Wicker !. George T. Cune- Bill to
ssction sci a.. ). S. Il. s ron n tic q Cloud of ta1 lille
rHl RlY1TABLE SOCIAL AND BCslNE4S fAhfSXasH1f.
Eawasd Enxle v. Sost;s 2; grss.ol, Mari
EngIe. and late wife Of complainant I'LL for An
accounting, etc. This ls = processing, in part at
x ns toh M ION e9nin
Grt, at the tctottV term Ut The VII Clcult Court
CoE,llat1ant mas Ea1z1ed 70 Met!tto o. the 18Th
day Of tlcro!,eF, ISIS, IN LaSac County, and he,
she AMI her father aud mother, shortly aftera.1
came to Chicago TIE husband and tatacr-in.lAr.
S .nf SupezGa 81 tn11Hs
capital and complainant furnishing about S, ooa
Ender the articles OF agreement theEe VIA to be
to eaeh Of 70 rer + cen cent yesfy sn,crcst npon sae
amount Of capital Subscribed. In pursuance Of and
s5 taef ToeS Il e
ton, subject 10 mortgage OF tloo Co., the5 pairing
s.uvte. THEY converted rne lots to the usrs uf =
! buslncsa They also borrowed large SUMS of
| moEcF, eau>fsirg the detss At future date
ss as
large creditor, required the Title OF the premises
10 be In Bristol, complainant conveyed his interest
10 them 70 bin the conse5ance bela9 onlJ TO vest
the legal title, Bristol conditioning to ftcoayey
when the Indebtedness 10 Cnshnan shou,d be
taken up. and tsaaacs IN eommoa senAa!ng n
! the A4seis Of the n1u. TIE parties coona1ed
IN business uuring three Jears,. with great
year, complainant, dvsosia9 alt h!s time, skul and
attention 70 i, 10 the exclusion Of bristo who had
no practical Sno.'eags I 49, Q! ~ he :s oassass1 49, -,
Darents of thu wife resided together. the expenses
| Of the united housekeeping beng taken from the
aaans aaa n .aen SIC Mese i.sTs and eG.
trsyaga1t, being dlsl'urted from his personal IT,
come. LIZ now charges that the expenses o1 his
| wiie wcrt nnuduenuy represented with the puf-
/ pose at cheating niu. ........-.-.
In 1ulr. 1kG7, Il ira rurchased twenty-five feet
o. STSana On ana aseoas
10 aid In the e:tctinn Of residence Thus sum has
Nil been since raid from the coHazt1crshlp assets
~ lie erection of q Rouse, >. cost Of fn,u,
s,ob0 to sl2 0uo, also furnished from the eomnany
az IL noney M Of III. 1irss:o n whose name,
without compiainant's know1edRc, the house RsR
suit i Il alleged that, with likG fraudulent pqt-
I ioI sought to procure toc deco Of the i1nt 70 bc
made to hia wife, which the vendor, Follansbee,
ne t. IL IN @ H. and
t:uele. that then vas IN trust 1ni The tcncnt Of
| their husbands, tile taaaeEz-
10 Eoven!bcr, ls6o, the taauery buildings we're
| destroyed by 1re, there being an Insurance Of
geo COO, which, With the assets ACTUALLY In the ns1,
made the resources Of the copa1tnersh'p equal e
shout Sizes With outsandfn Hshl1ties OF $5s,6i2
te1custre Of the residence and lott leaving sisess
Of wh,ch amount complainant "as entitled 10 one
| hall.
In February, 1863, tic copartnersh{o was dis.
solved; the liabilities were paid on, and about
$4,000 remained on hand not including the Wa+
PLATED SIS 100 to himself as an amount due 70 him
heinE the Of his caplt1i,, aud then reilsea tc
, allow complainant to investigate the books OF tht
trol. Some correspondence following Ii whicf
i,rstol Informed Enge that he was willing to NEE
4 hin at my t.te 10 consult over their affairs, bu
be cautioned him IN regard " TO statements that
4 heard Jou had been uastng"
+ seeking 10 dcirard hm, cootede.ated together ~
e dlsorre IN the Win Cireut. court, charging hiu
with being an hau'tual druukard. md alleging
Amopg other ihIngs, that his wife was 3 resideD
Of VII! County, She never hastn7 been sach rest
dent, and aubseqncns!y, " bis default . decree .
Y a HhninH
truth OF the allegations IN the bill for divorce, an
proners proof, stating that he allowed the caus
t TO 90 By Aefanlt because he had become conyluce
il of their determination to be nd Of him; becaus
j. II his Nltes great exttavaEance and her destre
lie rs also tha, q her mother. 10 be considered
ii ctetr Of Cn,cago,'' all Of which causes combine
hnd rendered his married life ntoetAbIe. he No
at sunpostng That they were also cndeasoring I
During all this time the parties had lived in ,ne
o. joint residence. which WAS lu1utto1sl, fornlsae
IT, al tho joint eIpense OF the partners In this
OF also claims joiul ownership Nevertheless, II
o1 parties in Jaluary 1902 eonse5e4 al We psope
as their own u.s. u.s.. ,ais Including s.,oaS which i
A claims to belong to him; subsequently porchasir
q . residence at OTTAWA, Of the ra,ne q abo,
i cc1y lot being also conveyed without cotaplat
10 snt'a knowledge or consent
las eeen Fohons M h s,e ps9sne1 s 4a al
I'd time, making fuse entries In the oool
aerOas O4 ans wseFeq Rs
|
he lie states that lsts:ol has become the owner Of
. .Sird interest IN large mercantile business, ~
t. that be claims to he worth ShUo0 pe1 AMMAN, Ind
Of lie charges, further. thas i,rs.ol had some n,
e saie ahti n::sonal relations ~ita so:nc .en7le
1t thea o'her than HIS wife, which cost bill
e1 much Inones, walch was charged upon the bnol
30 Q! the late rrtn improperly hui coneerai1g wiic
d In a. Tret :::ed se,slemea: complainant cor
4 plans he vas esl5 a'.e.ea :;+n lie Claims tn'
| Tv1 FftE5S f1 f3fh
ee;so ss'n e ss: a soasi as,
ia ia marry rs heF. III hc charges to f.c IN e
lot lot ,lsnls Fl sae consplrasy ass.a,t a!t
,.e I'll, iha: ssts sse al beca q p.erssns iaz j.
is E:ss 10 &c. divorce snl taa: she 20: on; q hi
~ nhe caull aad hui nnall. sent him CD WI
~ t:s t:nn6 ual an cl,st bo.tlc, al tht siale til
~ =, oasticg Of her pretended weai:h he aseTrnz tn
~ Ill Of this wra.l cxc..as slf. Of .:.oo fro
o. lie states, however. th.s h!s Late WIFI, i. 81,
" time since, On iAe sJ.h NJ Nav. caue III II, i'a-.
4, :uS place uni hai ! coaverssaon w::a a.m
"a as:ca he III s-,i:e !. Tsea ~. s:a:e, IA )
,s xas sc1r, nm SIC IA prec,:s III .:!s,-cc y
u u Ia s::asi LII 1919, ss'' rca:asi al !:
IN cxS sv'n'1;.,sa: 1s,;s: ~ ;,, bis :9on r,.
n \. ',.ers i .sIt.tns. 10 ,a:s rro:ss1
a vh!1 g k;!t proteetet 70 tEstfats 81. tn.1.
s. s,5s5 az nst 1s u y .12ay SSt9 is1 Il, IN II
- "
= a wuaia III s. e'niton rresedeasi settle Vi
- an3 scatkc 70 BILL .ae payment Of wha. Was Jas
~ s!s tlar. Wbtfupoa Aae said She haa hall III:
ssr sst T. ~ n oSs;y; aad .nia she ] Wa1.a e s9ns
,n rhc:l Complainant declined to negotiate tu11t
~ Lns!. Complete settlement Tas hnd- Ga the I
M loving day, by her request, be Gated upon /
r.: not e. tas tine appain5e6 he hsy
% s su1psse ,ns, lie p.ssies nsd ,cts II Tor o,sa,
lie then wro:e hts late wife a cotres2oniel
followed, ~ which It appeared thas En9e was
re- cnlcseo, Injurious, Us sne decmed.to tas ehsSse
Of his late wife, = hich she alleged a the canse
Of ihel1 further esfTangtnens, the complainant
tcg,nR that het visits, etc, we're Ill a part Of
AN conspiracy to ccIeat htu Ii obtaining jaatice,
The bA rta5s discover, Injunction and sets
T. Eeut.
~ teeordrrsa Court
MP AsEcnSb EXPERIENCE IN DIVORCES
The Court WAS yesterday engaged in the hear
OF : divorce casc- Z hts IS the cause Of Mar
Bentley '. Harvey Bentley. These parties Y
married IN jackson County, Iowa, IN the mon,t
husband bad cruelty used complainant, rcaien
A1& chofcd her; that he had often threatened 70
ton. her, and n January last without cause, he /
cured her AlEcst On Charge Of adultery, foil
Ing her through the streets as she wHs taEta to
sss @a u r. a9a saS
y sre1ed, dens1ng cruelty and alleging that his '
aud had been guilty OF adultery. 1t a1peated II
comr!xin1aft testimony thai she Is now or the
81 sSen'5 rs sssss' ana that III y he, hes seeoaa
f'' @ men sae &c vas rs Of s he ~ n'
n,Iecn- Size alleges however,
1sc that marriage, which occurred tn 1854 WAS With
her knoxledge or Consent Sue swore snss sne
~ k$v fh TT tt.- -