The Charleston daily news. [volume] (Charleston, S.C.) 1865-1873, 1869-06-21
EUROPE.

TRANQUILITY OF PARIs-sNTENCE OF LIE RAP
PEL PUBLISHERS AND PRNTERs-RIoT AT sT.
E1IRNNE. T. -L-
PARIS, June 18.-The city is entirely tran
quill; there are no fears Of further disorder
collision occurred yesterday ut st. Etienue
between coal miners and national troops. The
miners attempted to rescue some prisoners
held by the military. Firearms were used on
both sides. The rioters were dispersed after
seven were killed and many injured. Five
soldiers were badly wounded. At last accounts
order was restored. acs:l. t5,.t ,
PARIS. June ia crowd of people followed
the funeral Of the rioters killed in the recent
tumults.
Eight hundred OF theriotaxs recently arrest
ed have been discharged and two hundred held.
SPAIN NTI-MoN-PENs1ER MEnr1Nas--aENRR-
AL PRrM AND TIE REPgBL1cANs-TBoU
AHEAD. E. ~%s,
MADRID, June 18.-Great meetings have
been held in Valadolid and Seville to pro-
test against the presence of Montpenser in
Spain.
In the Cortes. Prlm declared that all officers
who refused TO take the oath to obey the con-
sttution would have their names struck from
the roll Of the army. Sagosta, Minister Of the
Interior, said now that the constitution and,
regency had been adopted. the shouting of Re
publican cries in the streets would be legal
offence. and would be prohibited. This deola-
ration produced great sensation in the
Chamber. a. .
& Marshal serrano will take the oath of Of
fee as Regent on Friday. Trouble is appre-
hended.
MADRID, June 19.-Serrano took the regency
oath amid loud v1vas. The following is his
Cabinet: Prim, Minister OF War, and President
selveda, Minister Of State; Herrera, Minister
Of Grace andJust1ce.
THE IRISH oHURm BILL IN THE HOUSE or LORDS
CONTINUATION OF THE DEBATE.
LONDON, June 18.-In the House Of Lords,
last night, the debate on the Irish Church bill
was continued after the close Of the cable re-
port. .s; .taba
Earl Kimberly defended the principle and DE-
tails Of the bill. He believed coocurrent en-
dowment inexpedient and impossible. Total
disestablishment and disendowment were the
only measures which could remove the
grievances complained Of. The opposition con-
tended that the land question, not the church,
was the real grievance. 1t was unfair to re-
fuse to remove one grievance, because another
existed which night hereafter be leRislated
upon. .f-aa,1 .r
The Bishop Of Ripon opposed the whole bin.
The Duke OF Cleveland supported the bill, II
the amendments could be made.
Lord Redsdale opposed the bill, especially
the clause deprivlng Irish bishops Of their seats
in the House Of Lords. Rather than reject
them, the Episcopal bench would consent to
admit Rom,sh prelates 70 seat with them.
The nntSa Of navonahiro fovorod {1,o hill
The Marquis OF Salisbury took the floor, and
said while he intended to vote for the second
reading Of the bill,I he did not wish to commit
himself to all the details Of the measure. He
strongly objected to the position and attitude
OF the House OF Lords with respect to the ma
tion, and deemed the assertion that the Lords
in asserting to the will Of the nation expressed
subordination to tho Commons as false. II
that were exact, it would be better for the
House Of Lords to disappear as o co ordinate
branch Of the government. ist @-ve1
The object Of the 3: cond House was to sup
ply omissions and rectify detects Of the f1st.
In many cases the House Of Comm ons only
represented the nation IN theory. In the naar
toEity Of cases the House OF Lords must decide
for themselves, but when the House Of Com
mons and the nation agreed on given point
the functions OF the House OF Lords passed
away. and responsibility devoyved On she nstion
and Commons We might fairly accept this
decision witAeas abnsEstion Of duty. Opposi-
tion to the decided opinion Of the nation would
only delay the inevitable issue, and create o.
period OF disturbance and discomfort. He
Thought the bills under discussion illiberal and
injurious. He did not believe amendments
would be contemptuously disregarded by the
House OF Commons, 90 had been intimated.
It was thought governments, with large ma
jority. gave prospect Of uninterrupted auccess.
but the nation would soon turn a. ainet.a q min
istef displaying dornineering spirit. Admit
ting any amount % arrogance in Gladstone,
the House OF Commons might. consider it's own
present position involved II the bill be re-
jected. Nothing could be more fatal than such
policy. The contest would then be carried
on under disadyaptage, and the House OF Lords
would finally have to give way.
Lord Colchester and the Bishops Of Tuam,,
Kallaly and Achousy opposed the bill, and
Earls Stanhope and Mellon proposed slight
amendments, and supported them briefly.
LoaDoN, June 18. The excitanent over the
debate IN the House OF Lords increases. The.
House 10 crowded so-night. I5f
Earl Russell .said that many illustsieua
statesmen, animated by ssslings OF Justice and
generosity.to Ireland, had endeavored. to set
tie this Church question, but their efforts were
!, vain. ss, aSgs2 s'.l ..Ts n .sg
The fact that but email proportion OF the
people Of Ireland BELONGED to the Church
established the justice and necessity of dealing
Z with tho qresticH.} Tha creation Or thu Irish
Church In The beginDing was u w1se thing, but
Tho resrlt sg khfee centuries mad9 alteration