Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-03-28
TEE COURTS.

CRIMINAL COURT. Vm. Hunter
J1dge.-Ihe following liss OF cases ar,
set for trial during the week
IS State vs. Cosgrove, murder.
State vs O'HeFn, laresny.
"A State VS. Ramsey, larcesy.
90 State vs. Pugh and Majors. lareauv
81 State We Kelly, larceny.
% State VS. Reeves, larceny,
~ State vs Curtin, larceny.
81 state vs. Bedford, hUussbreakiDg,
% State Va Fenner, murder,
VI state vs. Creighton, larceny.
20 state Fs henry, hOusebreskinp.
30 state VS. Johnson, larceny.
81 State vs. B5ll, larceny.
SO state VS. John Collins, alias Fatty
Jenny, perjury.
100 State VS. Richards, burglary.
lO3 State vs. Henry, larceny.
lO4 State vs. Moran, Esgsn and Fitz-
patrick, false preteDses.
los State VS. same, forgery.
l06 State vs same, larceny.
lO7 State Va White, hOusebreekiuR.
ITO State vs. Johnson, larceny.
ll3 State VS. Bower & johnson, larceny,
etc.
ia State vs. Brown, housebreaking.
All parties summoned as witnesses in
any OF the above stated cases must be in
attendance when the case ia called. or
forfeit9res will be taken agsinst them
and an attachment issued for their ar
Eest.
MUNICIPAL COURT-Geo. ". WaIdrca,
JHdge.-Yesterday was motion day. a
large number OF the motions on the
docket were called and disposed OF. The
jury, IN the case OF BsDgis vs.. Wild
berger submitted Friday, gave iudg-
ment for the plaintiff to the amount Of
S246 78.
Calendar for Monday:
1925 Mason vs. Bush.
1852 Kuhl vs. Trigg.
l4l9 Mageveny vs. County OF Shelby.
1902 Winters vs same.
1918 ThOrp VS. Y & n Y Fire Ina "a.
1881 Read VS. Grant and James.
1892 Jones vs Robins.
1888 German NationsIB Bank va Gill At al
1855 Leach VS. HardWiek,
1886 Barry VS. WidEig.
1887 Ames vs. Rocco.
l53s AthertOn & Go vs Geiger.
1889 Speer 4 Co VS. Morrow,
1910 Linde vs. Wood.
lS4l Taylor vs Ford.
1912 Oertel rs PfsuBensteihL,
1873 Sullivan vs. Tsagus.
1874 Psrtee ct al " Evans.
1915 Hummer VS. GeyeI.
l547 E1mOnds, Todd & Co vs. Graves,
Jones i Co.
1915 BTitOn vs cambridge.
1919 RAhkolpf VS. Burr & Co.
1880 Lsonsrd VI Twohig.
LAW COURT-H s. Lee, Jldoe.-The
motion docket was taken m in this
Court yesterday morning, as o az IL
convened. A large number OF orders
and entries we're made in cases which
came up on EOtiOn, bat none of tnsm
were W q decisive character, all hsipg OF
Cd interloeutOrY nature.
After the calling Of the motion docket
the case Of Jno. Csnovan VS.. A. P. Curry.
Sheriff, was brought before the Court
for investigation, on q writ of hsbass
Canovan, the petitioner, was
committed TO tie custody or the Sheriff.
time since, by Judge Smith, on q
charge of being guilty OF contempt of
Court IN disObeyiDg the commands o.
IN Injunction awarded and issued IA the
case of Knapp W. CanovGa % al, now
pending in the Caaneery Court. The
case weS argued at some length by Coun-
but not disposed Of,
On Monday thu above cause will be
resumed ana concluded. After which,
regular calendar will be called. with
loIl-unlon Bank OF Tennessee vs.. la
ct alas the first case.
Toe jury in the case OF johnson vs.
Pittmsn 81 al, rendered a verdict for the
plaintiff.
CHANCERY COURR-H a. II. Smith,
Characteristic Court yesterday. Mon
calendar Is as follows:
F43 Hodges vs Bank Of Memphis.
J99 Watkins VS. Specht.
The above csses will engage the Court
the entire day. This Court will adjourn
to Court in course on Saturday night.