New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1869-09-07

put his forward more than 40 years agOi There Is little
present one OF his letters TO Moore dated March s.
1872 Whch would seem to be conclusive upon tnls point
havior But we are all IN the agonies OF packing and
parting; and suppose by this time tomorrow shall
be stuck in the chariot with my chin upon bandbOx
hare prepared hoerer another carriage for ne abigail
aud oL the hrnPery wsich oW WireS carry along o'h
To have adys maid thrust into a carriage with one
az the beginning Of wedding tour might easily be I'M.
agihed TO be vexatous for is to be hoped nobody but
Byron has had any experience in that directions and in
balancing probabilities which more likely that Byron
might IN vexaon have aaid TO his WIFE IN reference 10
this proceeding of his motherin-law who did it, "You
had power to have saved me from this annoyance one
would suppose that mother madam, thought you
had married devil .-and that years after, this
membered to his disadvantage, and the version gwen
which Mrs stowe recites or that TO young anu loving
wife IN her maids presence he burst forth III the brutal
manner alleged In the interest Of manhood and human
nature We are constrained TO believe the former.
Mrs. Stowe that "during all this time another
guilher ana more canning memory overshadoWed ne
wedding hour" thus plainly leaving us to infer tat tne
CORRECTION between Byron ana his sister laG Oeeh gong
long previously TO this time. Yet we find from TUG
ourEeying was to take the newly married pair to Col
Legh the house Of the husband of Augusta there to
remain until the l7h OF March Could 1t be possible mat
thus writing 10 his most intimate friend about his
wife, taking her 20 the house OF his sisters
husband for the purpose Of ineestuous connection Win
The Hon Mrs Augusta Leigh Byrons sister by another
mother was five years his senior of the mature age OF
81 at the time considering the wife OF Col Leigh
and the mother of children holding assured place IN
society 10 whOm the tant OF Suspicion hdu hot noL
has attached SO this ncestuous adultery was not
those OF 1uIl years having OtneT anu ueLebV %
tons in life and such rs seem TO have rendered the act
impossible. And yet forty years after one went 70 ms
death while fighting in the noble cause OF the liberty Oh
Greece and than 2s years after the other went
IN purity OF womanhOod" the public called upon to
credit horrible story Of deadly sins upon such evil
mot ali Mt once did the full knowledge of the dreadful
reality into which she had entered come upon the young
wife. But there came an hour OF revelation
an hour when, In manner which left no KIND OF room Or
doubt Lady Byron saw the full depth OF the abyss OF IN
FAM ulip harm WI a
derstOod that she was expected to DO the CLOAK ana the
aCcOmpce Of this infamy."
What was this "revelatoul 7" What was this manner
which LETT no KIND Of room Tor & S rIgSsS
with II for t,go years before she left him
Many women would have been utterly crushed s, by
diaely, aud exposed and denounced the crime Lazy
The use Of the word disclosure would seem TO ind
cate the evidence the confession OF or both of
the parties But is that possible Why in such case
as this are We left in doubt as to the manner OF piSo
Why this vagueness of statement of the evidence which
.Tfiss, light q, to til, Jealous mind
Confirmation strong proofs Of Holy WHIT
How did Lady Byron learn that this connection had
been gong on for nearly year eeIorenef mafIiage
house where tins pollution present, she claims
years-one year longer than she actually did
Lady Byron live in the house as Mrs. stowe declares
she did for than year (twO) as cloak ana ac
oOmpllce Of such infamyi How, under such circum.
stances can the declaration Of Mrs. Stowe that she did
not her husband at last, but was driven from
HIM, be true} For the sake of pure womanhood'-
nav for the sake OF human nature itself-Ought not
Lady Byron to have fled from such house she would
driven from IT, her views OF the duties OF
wife would her to denounce the crimes therein
perpetrated she did not hesitate TO dencunce otneI
women less guilty. For, finding in Byrons desk the
Injured husband Why was less thoughtful in regard
TO her brOtheriB1aw. Col Lelghf Aud yet Mrs stowe
makes it merit in Lady Byron that she stad ia suCh
a house until driven from II by Byron.
We further called upon to believe that she main
child OF Augusta by her brother Now here something
tangible because are told the child lived to very
this child before Mrs Leigh had other children 10y hes
husband Why not possible that her husband was
possible for so bad woman as It's mother TO have so
claimed its parentage to shield her own reputation
in the power OF his wife by leaving the fruit aud damn
inc proof" OF their sin IN the possession OF LADY yIo
Above all, why should not Mrs stowe have spoken out
We do not here the remarkable of duty
to herself the world which induced Lady Byron to
foster such child born under such circumstance The
Christian spirit OF forgiveness which this shows s almost
too lovely Tor earth especially taken in connection with
the story OF Mrs stowe that Lady Augusta finally dled
i'm Lady Byrons arms She 10 have forgiven every
body concerned in these transaetions innocent or gn
save the most needing it-her husband 10 MN sue
is impIacabe even after death
cOudit be possible that Byron should write letters de,
his wife av for deadly guilty reason which he knew
That correspondence Byron desired to have published
and put into the hands OF his publishers for that puf
caused TO be destroyed SO far as he She
is to be presumed on her part at least his letters
Did show those letters TO Mrs stowei They would
have been the most valuable nenorahGa MIN Inc Inc
those letters exist hands OF her executor or
i due 10 duG 10 to Religion and to
the vorld-that those letters should be published and
a Character like that stated by Lord Byron, 1t is
entirely and totally incompatible win TINS Iate state
In nI her lawyer that which surprised and
shocked him and he says that after that statement
parties again. But it must be remembered that her
1Sfss 2a eEnS dS6 20 when upon
personal examination TO be false, Then, Lady Byron
saws she herself went and made statement which Dr.
Washington said convinced him that they could not live
in harmony more. and lie would nave nothing 10 90
lady Byron where says that Copies Of the let
tiers which she took from Byrons desk showing ms In
TO cOnyce DR. Lushingon that the parties had better
separate would think But without the necessity OF
believing that accused 10 him. noble lady OF incest
Lady Byron further says IN her statement that she had
communicated to her parents the facts upon which
say by Mrs Stowe the same thing In behalf OF Lady BY
May not inquire Sy seGT e 30 n5g m 6e
years OF her life, was proper one 10 he discIOsed 10
lawyer only OF to the world through tne coiuns VI al
Upon review Of the whole matter the light of all the
evidence of contemporary facts OF the suppression OF all
documentary evidence by the wife, OF the extraordinary
manner which this story is given 10 the public 10 II
the story OF Lady Byron If have 1t correctly detailed
to u.s. deuson mistake, than that tins horrible
crime in two persons has been committed ana remained
nTreyealed except q select few until tins day We
admit that Lady Byron herself believed this story We
NAV admit without scruple, that Mrs stowe believes IL
hut ady Byron may have believed upon very insufficient
videDce and Mrs Stowe evidently has taken her Deef
Tor the proof OF the without the slightest examination
of the grounds OF that statement BUT u may nay
uniting forward this story Mrs stowe, in apoogz-
mo for her feels that there is necessity or some expa
ion for the manner IN which, and the causes for
which Lady Byron separated from her husband r., Inc
world has felt thai, to-day, accusing MN OF le Or
narv inhdeities OF husband would not be suiielent
be took him with those; she lived with him with those
lar he'd