The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1869-02-23

rosF ert ser tn ate g
aa nv 81 al3
~ fsafea ea@ss s.
sbs a8 laltas b q =
tau n3s iaa a IS raae eat s
~ sst Is g asss .ssstlg la3
tss e eeft s sst 81 az IS
sfissaA ~ iasth 4sia.y ins
aa O. ~ i4at l4s lstase esa 80
els 6tg- Il eiaF 81 Ie4
gaaos aa sk sod Is aAso 90
at.s n n
sle i7 auftqeais1 asre Ensm s1sas
EeeaAf az ss-le tiat nHtts alto
vlab E uaas vas easily -
as.n.4.a. aal a. was nalosios.s thai
q eaa ae. 4,saa single p tufa
u SO 3. Il 'e.ap rAte -
st aal@ ta r.'a 81
hst4feettt zea tH ~ aa3s e
add maieuus Nov Ntsu o., i81a j.
@e s.aru b. .ppus aEal
tbe Jstsaat in au atenptaa re
lgaler Bal soslsrul h ~ Foso
eleagt He has mslienly as q % q
BE sphere. ascsudai d more ely
ssssI l,.ana ID 10 I, nary II nol i tbc
morM world, sua we sow cBeefia i
his resQguits elaatns a science i hot
10 apeaitr yoiy the Ethiopian
caa change hia ska and the leopard his
sp5s the aaeisnt writer vas p.staksD
or 81 not n,ead the principle 70 *
tend down 10 ttess To- e4eta.e limos
lie asserts Sputualsm to bea truth
less ISM Without stopping e specu.
late whether lis kuowleuga u the facS
aud phlloso ply would iusui, him in
making this sweeping assertion, We will
cite tie very fact Of ins own experience
in proof against him. thns The doc.
tnno 81 Spirituailsm is, that disembod-
ied spirits can aud DO make use Of aud
central tie organisms ofcertAin suscep-
tible persons called 'media" 10 write
aud utter sentiments altogether above
the mental capacity q such persons
now by surprising him q writing medi-
um IL LIS normai cundiloa SAsn be-
wror ID first artic,e. under spirit con-
uol when Ae pcnppd the aeeond, the
phenomenon is explained and the wri-
tef 81 the ole one article. u DIS aseasf
might be IDENTICAL With tie aiterof the
otter "T'am tod, indeed, tie first
wiitcF IS not the author Of the second
article. That it owes IFS existence to a
Grain literary gentleman who shall
be namelcss bat merely be would not
wish 70 palm 90 as bis own production,
The writings Il another, thereby being
guilty d the same deception Of
witch he accuses Miss Morse Batdis
o. thqi mus. necessarily DO tbe true the
ory, aud SIR friend may iale whichever
horn Of tie dilemma 81 chooses
Not 70 trspass too FAR, Mr., Editor
upon your good nature. on the columns
Of tho JolaAL, we mast uotice very
briefly the remaining portion Of the re.
io.udor Iiisa significant fact that il
ctutains no denia 81 any q our charg.
est Is simply recrimiuation, and
would aetn 70 nave been written By a
stranger uuacquainied with the circum-
stances 81 the ease, dill it not p1rport
to have the same author ~ Tie nm, ar
tlc!e. s,ipp,d d Us yerDo-ity, u pain
English It means just tLis:- " hen We
tell Mm you are aalleuunt, he answers
you, too a.nian ms Ne-ay you con-
cea your name no replies yOu, TOO
haye a singulnr coguomen Your mti
Gle contains loW iuslnua,ion that must
have emMited tor corrupt and
wicked heart --heis silent The charge
THAT one lecture WAS repeated from Tom
Paines inhdel book We believe SANDER
Gus aud malieious--he retorts in sub
stance you confess TO such an utter ig-
norance Of Tom Paine's writings That
YOU have no business to believe any
such thing, aud tins after quoting our
language, which VAS we acknowledge
rant q Familiarity with the writings
81 Thomas Pane. &c Is that confess
ing an utter want ~ knowledge? ?" We
invited him u point out the chapter re-
peated he has failed to do %. are we
not doably justified ia believing it
bass ddader.