, 1869-06-07
BREACH. OF PROMISE:
Sixth Day Of the Celebrated
Craig-sprague Case at
Wheaton.
Thc Testimony Closed Oh Bath
Sides or the Case.
Argument Of Mr.. Tourtefotte.

Spcte1} Despatch 10 INC tHe19o 1f1ouoss
WHEATON, Ill, Juue s.
ms fa,uous Craig scrssa spfague breach Of
promise sui. entered on tia e1tn DAY this morning
!, N o'clocs, n rte Circuit Courtroom Of this
,strtct The roum Was cary dQed By the |
9heatout,es, who hare come TO regard this case
,hetr own because It brings thelF little Etlagc
crnrn3nep,ly befosa the public The courtroom |
/. Inc most country halls Of Juatlcc suited 70 The
tala OF county cases, though hardiy large eoou9h
Tor salts Of the magnitude Of FOO 900 case
limited number Of chairs &C
lraHed namDel o. ae
public outside The oar, and inside the seata foF
counsel and the reporters are more ample and
convenient. Ills Honor tne Judge sta behind q
p,stn partition and Etatus q Justice stands oses
Ills uonot5 head. The laty looEs oat WlinoW
bandzges over her eyes, but 5eT scales are evenly
balanced, sufficiently symbolic Of the esen'nanaea
tustee dispensed by the court below. me room
IL neat atuund the wallis and The noof Is coFesea
with saw-dust. At the hoas apponfeda ne con, .,
TOuryeiotle accompanying the planting, aaa sak1ne
seats at either .ids Of nsI, Stna ahM e sis siss
ii the hezd Of defendants counsel Tne wives
al soI,lc OF the counsel sat Iaslte the bar atten-
ttve spectators Ct shs scene ana eaSes sssd ~ ~
lean towards the rlalnun,-uot tnat esi Elatse.e1
much except aa m Instance Of the e1eeptlonM
e T,sS ,nempers Of the,r sex when in trouble: The
defendant did not put N IN appsa1aneS N ,t,a NC
moTnng. but remained At the hotel en1oy yM6 nun
vii as bcst be could under the ctrr rIrsanees
The sheriff, By the ort}cf Of the Court, oroagnt N
tna cpntnm4aoc1 wls1ss4A
of Cincinnati Who w. On tie stand yesterday.
He occupied ceM IN jail 1ast night. md loossd
something the worse Tor wear and tear oL COZ
science. lie stu was stubborn He tesahed san-
think gasc her no prescription ou' tola oet
what to do, . ...,-- ,,--.,.
to 10 elsewhere, 4: the time abe visited you. to
70 cisew here for prescription, or otherwise, state
where and what the directions were
dl1cetious gaTeI think likely told her 70 90 70
could give her The necessary attention. am not
p> I;e5,eral LfadeT. Siate whether 1t wsa to some
| one living on Post street os St1th street.
Hifnss I can't exactly say where sent her.
| ! mAY have told her 10 10 10 Slxth street Thefe
| wa8 doctor there. . deH1oosuator OF anatoh h}y
in the college wherein held aprofessoEship, With
whom was on very good terms Ny impression
= T1s W couTt Whist do you mean by IN TN
p'sss Ritass. Well to the best OF my recollection.
scnt her there.
yeeterday thst you hsd made any exsm1nason1
n. Ftsers. Ny Impression y that be did ~ =
had made an examination, and then Feiaseo
tine w1suess hestta1ed, and quite wa1n arg0
| ment arose between counsel on this point
The Curt Well, gentlemen, ! viii have u
argument On that MISTER: Proceed, you nnv
| my uore questions to ask
fThe defence having concluded their exam!n1
uon Of the witness DC @ vas oElsFea 1sc6 70 y, }M
! he declined - answer tae queston.l
The next witness called WAS
| .Jaraes Gidner reside In Cincinnati, Q, Ny Ok
. | cupatiop Ia that OF trader on the rtSeL hns
known the ptaa,a for eighteen yenss EIom ase ~
J p!etl by her. Part ot 1864 aad until Jnly. 1851
e fes,del on George street, Cincinnati F1om ~
to january, 1sds, Was in the army. anu "1en a.
! ! home saw the plaintiff almost every day. ",
saw tie defendant a. CralRs house u !s6s ~ y
ing the non,hs Of Ansust Scp5emoeE n ~ sno az -
tober 1seA sedln Cincinnati; ;,,1v saT xaG nf aat oi
o her own house. She FiAlied 1n5 nooSe qnl
= frequently. In August, 1855 Do not rceollect n
:: raft Of September noticed she ~as falling
c Ecallh-her mental health especially. Al no IN
Il did nnd her eonfned 70 her oaatoom OF net "
d ! She Was EeneEaltS about the house
d M, Ittsrs, Do you knov the character or Re
utation Of The plaintiff for vrtne and for CHASTITY
+ HItn<ss. HeF reputston fsom 1851 70 1872
s1es seHea,edees & vi Is ep9s IL
,. the middle Of September, 1868 Tas a1ms t.I
! tine Am intimate with the familJ. l tail
j. It Has In the winter when she commenc
j. to recover ner usual health hsE @ment noe n
10 inowesiee, confined 10 bed should have knos
r It had she been bettrtdden- have alwa5a hss
Is s. good 70 ins day 10 lie 6css
" | my knowledge aud belief.
"a TESTIMONY or KITE HUKnL
fi G1therfh4 {iufiiL slrurH: ! reside " GlncMn1
II uEe lived therc twenty-five years. Have Ino
ac | pindntlI sl1reen yeaIs- An married uAye D
II the habit Of seeing sas raun q 9en @ tF0m t. sF
ss moved out Of the neichbothood- attendes
cntrch near Mrs, cTass house, saa freaaeo
slnns5 1 .nff Saw Il ine pasa ofeneT
ok usual. "A uiecc Of mlnc "as about 70
married At II. ns IN nna ~ fot NJ, y
ding. During these months, dtd not see ncs 6
on cncd to bed She DID net look we'll n that pen
Cd That state Of health continued until about
:. Middle OF the winter. She seemed nnch inprn
about Christmas, 1885. She has been snb}ecs
sick headaches. Knew that her reputation
Sc ,enae q M n 70 create aay otter il
~ mind saw Nj. sprague At crais;s often dit
e. > Ensirst; Am no, related to Alss Craig. F.
he August, ls5, TO aboas the .al,tdlc Of the Wtu
- she seemed wcak and low splti:cd- never he
her reputation for chastity discussed during
3D. TESTIMONY Or MI pCsN1S6.
Is = Du"niag tereskd a sstsf n9sos Ms'ssa s
3aa To- to haSe been e ert oil, vas handed TO Wines
cen Nr. To1stclotte.l That letter wss received h
.ar- Il WAS sent to ny care at No sa5 Soash j. !"
the opened, md II was then In the same condlue
OF | now. -..-. -.-. e..X,
Ia ,na 70 Ia sonT aouse eli III * al jennie brooa
,,ne objected to. Sustained. as not bearing an'
Of. Tw5al E7drIige repeated tnas be desi1s
are prove The defendant constitutional liaf; .u,
1rce Kttnkst rontinutd The condition OF Spt3.
Is IN eyes WIS good when saw n!m ~ .ne ap5,ta n
nth 1sGa In AprtI, 1866, be LETT ny nonset Wasd
sur had bean boarding. he lived on Warren ave
nse- near Lake street, atter that time una lay 10
tae e 1snoE s of 1i eI viking out Win delenda,
u is cnc evening spraKue then CANE 10 tuS hous
stns .na oa 'es sens AZ the eat pat
eaF- honse Tne! went ess xalksns md re- ssnains
sent until half-past 10 o'eaock- Did nos $50
ave | ta.k 10 he! when she came back
r IN Ctea.-t1aminatir. an security for the
In this case. The defendant Ea5 mol scE 10
rlt- Or May, 1865: IA letter written 70 Mss Cr'
ioan which Il attached nnnn1n9s uame, WAS
Lon shown The w1t1ess1 ,--..,.
been NJ, rkrs. Is that YOUR haud writtnTf
~ VISIT ge 10 ssaie al IN regard TO ta,t letter,
gull state the whole fact swear rosiIseH nete
emily II ~ns all Written under tae a.aaon y
0oie- beginning 70 end, is liz c5eep& the lastee
ue<., a. e,et;e1 ii flon III. sprasue when i rsa De-!
& tor 10 her (lelter here shoEnl ny partner Was
CITY once when she opened she !ettsf .aere3
i Tue @ piece @ I aa7tng been eas or ION on Hare
been 4 friend OF Nj. sp7gues- Have kno7
a 'N psia.H ". Isers e Wnss Wss your object in thu
oulce representing the case 70 herr
ID % Aitnea4 The ogteet I 20 T. q Wi9sHree ns Pr
II he tasi would no. aasrer The letter. sne b.
ten me, rrqncst1ng me to tel where ". 81
AZ ia q e nf pof nes q iha III L.
pedss Bc1s eveI e4 sa1ns v!iEen aatans . viz
1H:AiuuxT or xR. xl1Eh
s. 4. Na.r, stewn: reside IN clnc
e see estsans ess, po saee Ds IS ~ Hs4s
am- George q. BarEo1fs since ls&A was PRO
skes " Haldvln once, in Cincinnati, when Y
os- recognize bis Btgnature on the document
| member the i1teuugatoEtes Propounded !
spso aw5sth n he aa 9nis IT, Tesr ne n1ea
ons q this case. hare never been IN attorney
III tnis esse before it went TO r!al The Last did
; WAS case WIS shout Jear aeu- hare not CO..
70 oe. With The attnzneJa n this Gag about e:
el1ttre | day communicated With Me86zA Edf11
his Tpurlelotte about the cake, while coming u
1rts.en tam / va. not originally employed N q
Is not eupsoyesL "a S i1as 70 assend . t6e oase g
n sad natl ii the wnJ Of czuss examining Wnsn q
en. ,.soai zsEs LII g a.
d done Goa . merchant tailor IN Cinetnna
las1sa r. taas nar1owes Was common 9Ia aSie1 T.,
:esated was not taee.,. He sai1 he ras coming Q!
'ecn he E:A hnow The reason WHY Dr. = u 20
"a dePoasuon was not tafen; !" oeeaose e,.
2 5000 Judge BOYD, Miss eEais>s uncie. employs
he nal. An assorne!. think thtnE
rseel:n ArL lsonez Crn1q. reeelied Examined
nnr1ed Tou1teIolte>; i hase seen man who can
oheesi self DE. Da7oEes- He cane 70 ny no9s s
2uent1! fall Of 15e:. In August September and
: eaased by eenGal debtns5, los, q appsttst
Gofe1, NJ Tosrsslotse- Vtas Ess The matter
lst1aa- toojeeted 70 By MI. Peters. oreualed.
By ne Fanek. Nervousness nd disorder,
use ne There Fas nothing The na1tter Win Der e
I f2lasIYc | fever and 4ehSHsy N FcufI0-