Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1869-03-09
THE COURTS.

LAW COURT-H S. Lee, J,tdge.-Ths
case of johnson VS.. Wicks ct al, wss
given to the jury late yesterday after
noon, but no verdict has been returned.
TIE motion docket was not called yes
terdsy, and motions entered thereon will
stand over till Saturday next. Tne fol-
lowing orders were taken on verbal mo-
ton /:
1862 IT. D } Richardson vs.. Ike Walk
or, ct al. Judgment below reversed.
BalIenger Va. Gray (ExscutiOn dGeket).
Further suspension Of execution for ten
days.
1870 IT. D Hunt VS.. M~orningstar &
Kelly. Judgment vacated, and defend
ants have until Saturday to give other
The following cases will be called to-
day:
2l81 Watson, trustee, vs. Mitchell ct al.
2l56 vs. Williamson.
2568 4" vs. Nelson.
454 johnson VS. Bank of Memphis.
1860 Sturges VS. Jackson ms. Co.
Il0S Patton VS. Beaumont.
ll44 Rogers VS. Torrey ct al.
ISL Patton vs. German Nat. Bank.
CHANCERY COURT-Fm. II. Smith,
Observation-Disclosures filed yesterday:
Weller VS. Quimby, sale confirmed.
Vance VS. Yates. final.
Miller vs. Bandy, further time.
McCombs VS. Looney, insl.
Marshall VS. Vernon, decretal.
Brown VS. Williams, insufficient.
Ward vs. Hedrick, same.
Cases set specisliy for to-day on mo-
lions, pleas and demuTrers, are as fol-
lows;
Sommerville vs Shelton.
Fiannery vs. Cooper.
Cook VS. Mckinney,
745 Byrne VS. Finn.
S25 Finnerty VS. D2shiel.
After which yesterdays calendar will
be taken up commencing with Boro vs.
Hartley ct al.
The Clerk of this Court will be COM
PEELED to enfOTcs the late rule Of the
chancellor if attorneys who have 81.
ready held papers beyond the time al
lowed do not return them st once.
MUNICIPAL COURT-GeO. ". WdtdrGn,
,Jtsd0e.-This Court met yesterday morn
ing and disposed of a few cases. APP
pended below will be found q list Of the
most important Judgments rendered At
that time
Swassy & Co. VS. Robins, Judgment for
plaintiff, 1851 20.
Fitzmorris vs. Walsh, judgment for plain
tiff, $3.50.
DeSoto Insurance and Trust Company vs.
Mackey & Co, judgment for plaintiff,
S679 03.
Me- clsnts National Bank, Judgmentfoi
plaintiff, 1888 Al.
| $ t-ausberger ct al VS. Rocco, Judgment
for plaintiff, 1895 90.
To-day the uutFied cases on yesterday
calendar will be tlcst taken up and de-
termined, after which the following cal.
endar will be called for trial
1908 McHenry vs. Mitchell.
1888 Terry VS. Rutland Ell 81.
1884 Mostly VS. same.
1885 Jones VS. same.
1856 Hinton VS. same.
1887 Tate VS. same.
1897 Hunt, admir-, VS. WOrmeley.
100 2 & d Northern Bank OF Kentucky
VS. Winn ct al.
I7l8 Harris VS. Keller, admir-, etc.
1919 Harris VS. same.
1921 Bras VS. Pike ct al.
l725 Lea VS. Hughes.
CRIMINAL COURT. - Vim. Hunter
LGdqe, This Court was engaged all day
Yesterday in hearing the argument o
counsel in the case Of the State vs. Pru.
lit, now on trial for the murder OF Police
man Rogers. AttOrney-GsneTsl ThOrnt
opened the casa for the State, followed
by Messrs. CAN'T, Anderson and Bul
lock, for the prisoner. ]. F. Sale, Z q
will make the closing argument to-day
in behalf Of the State; after which th'
case will be given to the jury. Ii th'
above case is disposed Of in time tn
Court will proceed with the case of the
State vs.. Fred. Russer, indicted for muir
der.