, 1869-04-14

United Stnsca Cou.ts.
9oHoas for naM teta.s Nege Continued yester,

uot,o,. ~ n.sea @ saasea Courts.
~ xe''ea' seF aaH atA8 Kess Continued Jester
aa'' .,,rn,~o,z
AI4EnAIIoSs OF FA~Cn.
IN rs ea.e q John r CuI71e '. Alien Jordan Ct
This \ demurrer to tbs bill, The oaly oues-
uon @ N the case 3 whether the demurrer u Wetl
tAxens and think II B not me
tn Isd1 tie ntatatir recovered judEn.eat, IN Ill
eoul1. a&aanst Allen DORIAN, upon which Judgment
Maess "a EXECUTION ,n Tss dnly Issued an del,red 70
tsosessy 70 ms case. Thc property Was mt soao
having been = rnortease msdc By Jor-
dan 90 ne property xhleh Wa llcn
at the time tnat tho Judgment MES obtained
bia vas died IN The ssate court 70 forecloso tho
I'D @ es N 'ots tss pesns,es ee
AfIEr th!s was doue, Allen Jordan confessed judy
nent tn faEor Of certain person, aud tnst pe1Son
clo+are.
81 e1sa laasueat mica tae pl.inttT nsd Ia
the property; the object Of the plaintiff betn9, a.
he ta5A, II putcha!sn4 the property IN this FORE
9!es11s sn SUI, sgPy p9tsst hs Interest u i
ieseed was ffandn]ent: faat The propertJ really pe
loDRed 70 Alien jordan, aud It was done for hts
VIM Whsfevcr might be the le, conclusion II this
tadRnsnt se.e for bona kit debt as 70 the right
81 rTasmpaeo IT. !. Is elsa Tne1s Il :
part! Affected By that fraud can dc . htll in 3
court Of equ!k! and eak for relief. That Is the
thas cou5t Of equity has jurisdiction pf the case
to detczmi1e the Hxhts Of the psit3es
Demurrer oTeIsaieA, Win lezse given to A.
kEer
CONSTRUCTIONS oY 4 .r.r1nw
In this coutt Judge Drurutond ma3e tec,.,on
lsw ef this s;s,s reiatin9 10 III noTer n cnr.
nornte hniv nnder il tn iesfwfh tke re.t ..t,t~ -
misht seqnise- Thts va ID lie msttsT of csroi
nlcd Il, ~ tsi+fr nn,T--s 80. - ~ .,a nt ~,
Glass comnapr. The lsrssios rsa ~ ,he n,Tn~1
tnr eneet: ~' 'N'4'''
The nf]y ruetSpn fr ti,ta n - Il m thA ,.~.r
or the Eninn f;inss f.Trra7,I t7 Ioafs pu"1.
Of some ptppesJ belonging 10 IL cou1paaf. L +
eoniended on the pstt Of the plaintiff that mort
uitra strxa as understand and not vtthIn The N
thof1ry ef he cornpauy to mats. TNe nnestdnn
e se1 ~ 1s ,e sSs q 1stg a1a % re e; 81 ~ +
Of ts4e operoies upon the cona,,T nj .,i.sh;ss
frpE maEog morsSase e &@-t@@'@' A3'' s1A'aSAss -
.h.s wteN earrnsn4 h.d hn - =. r9+s 49,
y1ded In the 1Ts eestton snI r.e1snrts - XII
tfsi ~ nse p5ops1 ens1 iSns aaa 6a~
afe ana tSei1 s7rr~sso,s shnn1H Is cnrnor.tton
b the name stated n 4pch certI1cate: Is: taeJ
Common zeal aand tSeT W shaii AT b. iher corporste
yesnr nv resi i or pe!rsonai essste whate1sr,
MnI !. a & q dS 81 ooepzson, 70 aae n susa
certtacate. hut shsi; not mortgage the same or
cdye anT lien there on
CudoGbtedlT Il this isE ras binding and optrat-
inE o. lie company, II would not c.othe ,he com
pany With the poweI ot making mortgage, such
a. WIS xusde Ia ths case, but the oct Of 1857 cor
tatua no sch restriction In InanJ respects It
seems TO be duplicate Of the acs Of 1879. but ia
acme particularly The act Of 1881 L. different; fot
example, the act Of ls49 Requires the cefaeate to
which the busAcss Vas to oe Transacted. The set
ot 1877 Fe9uiEss ne ce5tncase p Be tlea IN the
theEe ere tone minor differences 10 the two aces,
and the second secf1oa or the Get at 1857 teciat,
thai ne s3QttA r sseSS I of he company shoald NOT
Inc Hf1e o. rs e1steace W4s not to exceed tfry
,sonsa ~ ~ rnisT ~ nns ss tat ne cata stoe
:, hho4,a ~ " t! pa,a ~llna tont 1ea1s ohe7.ise