, 1869-06-04
ing fof d1yu1ce On tne esu1nd Of desertdou. Hsc.
r19u Md 70 have occurred ID The III daY Of Jan-
K Est5s 1s& 49, Esq

:: s.ss e fa hs Il u Of W. ~,
Fsa1: !! ~ s=::; -: >:A2sg
. 81: Reear2er,i!csuzx,
The business Of yeste1dAy was mainly male Nh
Of the concerns connected with Tho iats0ductton
Recofaer. Hercaiter majority 81 taese persons o
ed this ceremony far thEmseagea - ren a. he
Those Who acted a1set This Latter manner were
dealt wna On Iner pleas Of guilty As follows:
nav,!1 sfD S.1os3 o61 70 1n3 r p11nsn Snr.e NJ nn
John Ferguson and John Hsnes. Cow stealing
Henry Bsahasa- Larceny Il elothinz, One
sS.,ssIs SSs;ss xec.rnr. L.seen, Of ~.sen sns
oas Emma 1e. selsaa- Larceny q a watch and spoonx
,.,9 ssaltts Wilson. 1.,eea, OF buaalo robe. one
'ae0h hoetsna- Larceny Of clo,nmx. ons year.
nens, lone. 70 % sogx7v 1a !ans ,n
month";. 'seennei', Larceny Of spoons Taiee
aajs jsofs' uazsaa> Larceny of clothing. Ten
teea ead5s a. Mccarthy, :lasren, Q, ,esa pipe. Ft
as1s ia.sfck Milan Larceny OF = book. Ten
John Raymond. larren, Of e,o,n,nv ,,,,*,
Teat1erous da1s- Larceny Of Z pair Of shoea.
ksI ks,eftF nsSss ;,. ssen, Of clothing sn.
,,sIas Gnssics haueE; Larceny of elorh.a7. Thirty
John vddies- Larcep, Of . con-. rx.,..
Mary Holmes, Larceny o; c,o:atcr. ,,,.,,,
f., Pa6p Gut11aa LscenJ Of two sn:su. 81 81
John Fitzgerald 1arcen, OF .ie.a, rca
William Barker. Larceny Of soo.s- Ten a,rs
Tha same. Larceny. Fifteen days
John cEuse. Larceny Of opera glass. Ten
Edward Burns and Thomas Harris Larceny q,
Hs Twenty da1a -
:6d, Edwa =, = 1aHes being ,nas.e, as ,ne pub
e pfser T1 so & N poeesto
! was arIasRned. He pleaded NOT guilty, hui &c.
nowietFrd his connection with the sheet. He
se om he County = ii. p.eisna q % osn sass
no moEe, &c. lie WAS allowed the freedom Of the
ctry on hts personal Eeoegniz.nee. '.'>'
piSOACN DECKKIn
Hannah u snnpe Y. Isaac Snupe Decree Of
divorce g1aufed on hut lied On .@ ednesdsy Il
agpssassd 3D. sass ,hs M parties rsrn married IN Canals
cnunttsed atsniteu Win one Jennie Car, on the
lst instant and that the wife nled her bin On ths
samuel {: PesnnRa '. Sarah a Pets,ns.l1
ns1se e o. o. Ssso1ce rendesesl The parties wers
s e. es4as sasa' =, sa sne q
geIt q weach one William Loseland, res.dent ef
PhuadelphtA fe8tldetl thai he WAS well ACQUAINTED
Win the parties; that the w1fe had deserted her
home and husband. and tnst ae guessed
Vas too nigh true that she
! ran on With quite rnrnr
fellow" he further expressed tie opinion thaf
complainant had treated her too geil altog.hs1.
| because she must hare been carving On c.sof
Nhile with mat fellow nefore she rsn Oh viii
hiiu. 1osepaino Foster. stating that she was al
Efncin1an twofe that 6he had Known the parties
fuT some time, and that hlle Has surprised "a rer
the defendant with 4 tail, da1t, yonng man. Who
Nas younx enonEh 10 be her sou, vita waon H..
fendnpt Eaid ahc hoa elope4i- She tw,tnrss, III
not bs!lase it, for she had doubts whether H.
| young man Wnu1d run away with such an OH No
confused ut meeting witness @eA@''
| NEW SUIT.
| Henry J. AeAlen Y. Jennie F, Nc.i!sn 1.,.
Clark Proceedings fot divorce. 1t - si1.s,t ~
r. !i bl that tns parties were married IL Jollet,
last Il Il charged thai, ius iass afier H., -. ~, May
| ding. tne defendant Committed aiultery With onc
John Tyler, since which time compIalnant has not
lived With her. Notwithstanding that " he has eyrr
! been ITO her "a true and faithful husoan,i.'