, 1869-05-15
Recerdefsa Cour1.
Austin 2: Ho1mansv. Henry Z. Fessel yeri!ct

l0f pl2l1Eu LOT $NX-
N VIOLATION OF woMANB AI1Hra
Stephen Goodman Y. Catherine Goodman, late
VFlahstty Decree Of divorce on the ground Of
the T. cruelty Of r. Te Ins parties weFe married
zoo Or about TIC I'd dsy oi December. 1853. Il
lent msnaer ia otbsi1e msssted T nn IL a1; anI
or about the Sd day Of December, 1t Chicago,
she again struck and beat him. and has, ever since
and opproSftoas l.nsuasc, md nas S1i frcqueatIs
has teen rendered miserable. &C The hasband nd
that the woman he decreed hereafter 10 adopt the
tame ahe bore before she wedde1
4 sot.pIkRh W1FK. ...
James kieest Y. Julia klccse. Decree Of d.
vnrce- The bill In this case Vas nled on the 1Tth
day Of April Last, md within q few days personal
service Haa tad upon the defendant. Two wiz
ntsses we're examined One was the complain
ant, Hhu testified that be had been resident IN
thts city during tfeen years and that he was rnar.
ne Th hep %
the 18th Of Apr1l be, In sompany Win Policeman
KellJ, found he1 In house Of III fame, her profits
a Kels, oi "a 81 se Seh anHiin atEee cor
robo1ated this statement Of the husbands, n.ialng
that he had known her az notorious counesan
oaih, complainant stated that be- had only lived
with Ills wife during three mouths after marriage.
when he enlisted in the army. and 6hc undertook.
Al a l,uhneAs, the 1oOseAess Of life that she has
s.hce followed.
4 AwKt1-SAMED CHup-HER PARENTS pivoKcEn.
Madison De Ia Bruwn v. Mary ]. Dc ia Brown.
Decree Of dirosce. In 1his case the decree ran
uI,ol the sole testimony OF the complainant he
testified that be Is copyst and teacher, boarding
At the Gardeu City House, and . resident Of this
Statc eiuce $50; that he marrtet defendant at
Springfield in thts State, 10 july, 1859, and !lre4
with her to the winter OF ahe left him
ct that lime he Vas residing, as teacher,
at Bushnell. McDouou9h County. She
went to Springfield, sEalnst his -selno1strances,
that ahe might keep boarding house. Since that
time shc had refused to live with h!m or to allow
him 10 Stay With her, she having also instituted a
house OF Ill fame, from which he had caused the
arrest Of con1es8ua- Since that time the woman
Tad herself descended lower In the scnle Of her
class The parties have one child named :" Katy
Mercy Jane .Laura Delora Ellen De Il Brown, II
kat1 to have survived her birth 8eEeu JcarA-
NEW SCrfA
Mary Dlr1nlnRham r. Patrick birmingham Pro
ceedlnX for divorce. Complaint states thAt abe
mazYted defendant, " ~ neaf as she could recol.
!ec: In January, 1874 ana had borne SIX Children
10 him. She charges tuat the husbanis is habit
Cal dtunkard. 1t Is said that the parties live tn
email cottage, No. 4i3 Erie street. upon leased
land 10 the building Of which She claims largely te
haye contributed, and which she asks aa ntTNony
Mari IIeszog v John NerZog. Proceeding lu1
divorce on the grounds OF drunkenness and cruel
! ~. The parties were married Ia Cincinnati, o..
on the 6th day Of May lB4B and came to this cit.
| ten years Mhce. They have three children. Thi
| wife also clnttns the ownership OF store No 81
State street, with Its htock Of KtnceE1es. and oh
tGined an Injunction to restrain her husband ftou
1 1, farfey{p1 nth her