The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1869-10-18

au9 yeaf, tnat the wlsest thing the government OF
al other troubled spirits can do Ia to suffer the
COUNCIL 70 take its own course without let hind
Of ths Munich professors and to remember that they
i've IN an age OF steam, electricity and NEW YORK
hERALDs, TO say nothing OF Spiritualism. pneumatic
OF widely different character to this disquisitton
OF the doctors IL the discourse delivered BY Arch
CATION at the Procatiedral in Kensngton. The head
OF the Roman Catholic Church in England untes the
fearessness OF soldier OF Christ with the fiery zeal
OF convert He Is bold and aggressive; unsparng
IN his attacks upon the herettcs, whose unhappy
ranks ne once belonged, and unyieldlng In his de-
mands upon the faith and obedience or the faithful
OF whom ne is now prominent leader. HIS appear.
ance In the pulpit 10 particularly Impressive, his
style OF speaking clear and forcible HIS TALL spare
form s shaken by fnhrmtty, but there is nervous
vitality within that seems to brace up his sinews and
10 burn perpetual fire in his KEEN gray eyes. HIS
seatences I'VE IN the memory. He has Q
me head with few struggling iron gray locks at
me SIDES and bald at the top, giving additional
nelght TO naturally high and broad forehead. His
features are prominent and his mouth az once sweet
ana Lrm In its expression. He Is popular among
DIS people, and wherever he breaches The crowded
congregation is certain embrace hundreds VINO are
NOT o. the CATHOLIC aiJh. He TOOK for his text
H,s a,s, sne words rom John w. eo"Many Of
nard saying; who can hear itru and applied them
70 the CONSERVATION which, he held, had been Gre
syllabus on the Feast OF the Immaculate Conception
nve years ago. The Syllabus, Its name implies was
propositions which the Holy Father had previously
promulgated during eighteen years OF his pontif-
cate and which pointed out and condemned the
intellectual errors OF the day. The trouble caused
by tnis compilation the Archbishop held, was at
tributabe 10 the fact that OF the errors thus
condemned were such as had crept into political
society, and he believed that If the Pope had con-
fined himself simply to faith and morality IN the
little objection would have been heard against the
syllabus. But his duty as pastor OF the universal
fock had required HIM to point out and condemn
SnIlhu hfah 1oy
root OF morals and hence the world had beeh set
an uproar. Far from the object OF the Arch
bishop was 1t, however, to follow the example OF
the Munich theoogians, and attempt to argue that
although these errors had been condemned by the
HOLY Father there existed no obligation on the part
OF the Church, even before their adoption by the
Council to declare obedience to the teachings OF tho
syllabus the first duty OF the Catholic world. On the
contrary ne sought to show that the primary duty Of
Catholics, in obedience 10 the Holy Father was to
enroll themselves as the opponents or those bold and
terrible errors, liberalism, progress and modern
civilization. Could 1t be wondered at he asked that
when the world, with great courtesy sometimes
with great supercilousness at another time, and
great menace always, invites the Roman POntif to
reconcile himself to liberalism, progress and modern
civilization, he should say, mo, 1 will not and
Christian marriage. Your progress means secular
education; l maintain that education Is intrinsl-
1t is good thing That should think as they like
talk as they like, preach as they like, and propagate
what errors they please. say that is sowing error
authority over the Christian world, that am not the
vicar OF the Good Shepherd. that am not the su-
preme interpreter Of the Christian faith. am all
these. You ask me to abdicate to renounce my
supreme authority. You tell me ought to submit
to the civil power that am the subject OF the King
Of Italy, and from HIM am to receive instruction as
to the way should exercise the civil power. IsayI
am liberated from all civil subsection, that my Lord
otherwise, that In His right am sovereign. &C
knowledge no civil superior, am the subject OF no
and decr q 80 ns
OF men-of the peasant that tlls the field
and the prince that sits on the throne-Of the house,
hold that lives In the shade OF privacy and the
Legislature that makes laws tor kingdoms-I am the
sole last supreme Judge OF what is right and wrong.
Your progress is departure from Christian cylliza-
ton; In that path you may have many companions,
but me you Will not nndn
When. such IS the position taken by the chosen
mouthpieces OF the Holy Father-fOr the Archbishop
OF Westminster stands high in the confidence and
affection OF the Pope-it Is probably difficult for the
tlmd to make up their minds to accept the comfort
able dogmatc general result" Ct the detailed reply
OF the Munich doctors to the questions OF the Bava
rian government or to believe mat me Pope mas no
Ecumenical Council to raise his infaibllity into
dogma Of the Church and to soiemnly
sa0p es srs a results o the s
gathering at Rome. Nevertheless, common
sssy REORGANIZATION Of the ery earnestness P OF the
Archbishop with the reassurtng logic Of the theo-
loglans. The tidal wave OF free ana independent
landmarks OF the Church OF Rome, and it may well
be supposed that the Holy Father Is unwilling to sit
without an effort to check the progress OF the waters
A tightening OF the rens over those who remain
faithful may prevent greater namosr rom kicking
true Interpretation or the policy that has served to
set Europe IN something OF blaze, and hence both
Archbishop Manning and the Munich theotogians
may be on the right track in regard TO the Syllabus.
The churehman with fierce ZEAL presses an Implicit
faith In Its doctrines upon his fock; the logician
cooy argues TO prove that 1t Is designed to have
practical effect upon the outside world. Both may
be correct bat whether the step shall prove to have
Imam vutaa ana nnln WILL Ghnty
Meanwhile the world viii still move on, and Liberal
ism, progress and modern civilization" thanks TO
press viii hold their own despite popes archblshops
sylabuses and ecumenical councils.
Prince of Wales scaudaI-An Everyday
Report OF the Alledged Everyday Life Of
His Royal Highness-His Companions and
the Cost-what the Princess or Wales
snys-Queen victoria's Three sons-Lnnd
Reform and Military Movements.
LONDON, Oct. 4, 1862
AZ you are no doubt aware from report the heir to
the British throne is as alleged, neither given to
observe the seventh commandment nor does he
attempt to hide his shortcomings in that respect
His companions and intimate friends are all
young, unmarried noblemen, who are noto-
rious for the immoral lives they lead,
and who openly boast OF the conquests they
achieve and the female companions they patron
lie. The Prince although married TO one OF the
most charming women in Europe, has, it Is reported
everywhere almost broken his wifes heart by his
inndeities and very much Of her long continued III
ness may be attributed to this source OF annoyance
Curious to say, his Royal Highness although by no
means better than most young men OF his years.
never became openly immoral until after he mar
ried. Among the ladies FIRST attached to the house.
hold OF the Princess OF Wales when she came to Eng
land was one OF the handsomest women, on very
large scale, that at this English Court.
This lady mad already been talked aboutn ana her
name was more or less mixed up with that of three
or four well known personages, but there was moth.
ing that could be actually proved and nothing posi-
lively known against her. However, soon after she
Joined the Princess household she was evidently on
Tar better terms with tho husband than with the
wife, and the irtaton-I give II the mildest possible
hor and no uiu uaar