, 1869-07-29

Criminal and eccIe+lastic7l law being Is Eus
stated al concns1tpg sflss TING Taace AMI c!rcun-
sis rnn mas' e ~ a1a
nstonllhment when sns CONT refused to cpaslder
hu objections y seemed 70 him that II tho
little hzotheI:J love, they would hkrdJ haye acted
q they did, arriving at q conclusion conuary to
The lsv q tas lssd, and ne law under Hhish they
II have thus fairly, and u souo length, knox,
but as thir, and O. distinctly, and rcaly n breezy
ss thought The interests OF ny client demanded,
rlaced tefosr L. court these several ohjectionA
7 pcy are MI J.ns1ctouA1 every ona Of them mud
toe our viii IND, think, well taken The Court
WI oe called upon 70 aytve VI the conclusion TINT
to the canons. and utterly rtnout Jurisdiction
under the canon*. to convict ry tusrt
IN q manner and mode not provided for by the
mtaMte1s the uTepnrable wrong OF d,p1ivs.on
and degradation from hi1 oflce a . minister. We
were compelled TO tnterye nc a We did at thr Tina
We did Tor the canon gerutA dellr, M the atlegz-
tons OF th!s hut snoW that the complainant could
mt poE1lblJ haze !.surcd Under my other cnnsic-
ton Than TINT not only would 1ha sentence Q: de-
Innocence, but that before the adjournment Of tao
court. and they fHo II pretty Mcu beiore tho ad-
turrmenl Of the court: Tue bishop was presms
to show. As II can b1 raAe 10 ehow, the Bishop
VINO wAs rrrhent would pronoance sentences At
otce. The intent u Bet M tho threat IA alleged,
the has'y proceedings taken, are al spread beioru
"Thc eauon permits the El.hop before The court
adlonrns, Which. nstortihS to the construction
TINT he prt upon thcsc cano3g IN bis celebrated
answer, would mean before the court rose after
giving IN the sentence, he WIS enabled, strictly
within TIC conon. ,o:rro1 ounce that tcn;cncr be-
fore the court nUjb1rued- Seeing, then, that all
lhcae proceedings Werc void, rs nave attempted
10 show; that hnd vailed LII The iaSt moment.
TINT We had tested the temper. and disposition Of
these gentlemen ~ho n8EuMtd to tnke our fate In
bearancc and patience called uron us 70 d.; sce-
ing. then, that re stood n thls great this immt
ntnNl hardly knew how to Characterize tho ter
r,bc dnngcr-Ne then applied TO your Hoaor for
tho WRIT oiiotuncilon Witch va! Issued ana served
oecnu,e Nc hoped Iii tho lat tnomsnt Tncss
were our brrthTcn: nlthough 1ncy had Uvrt1ued
oar challenge; although tieJ aas there With
though wo believed that justice could lot be o!s-
tatnrd; ttl1 appealing 10 the law and ttc Icstln,o.
n5 ~ II stpod On the face 1t these pspesz. wu en-
At thcr hz,ds- We failed, and wu ca e into in.
brnh where the INV Of ihr iund Is administered
II con1csa caunoL submit the casa without re-
bcen Speaking. which l hAyo omitted to notice,
eomo OF which might Impress your uoaors mind.
ist Ia 191a,Hn oa Of ~ esas KY aeenl,
s Hte; 'n' arsss senaea ass ;nyD1s. pqsa' =; pc
8SsI ..s spss5 pssssa. r. sn!s ssss s1 ts
trrcphfatls wrong sod Injury would be Indicted
oton The community IN which he lircs IL thcso
EtV&<G1AA4&1 <44A1AAAlN al t4S SEAAuCQ WHICH VIC
nppEcncuo md which Nc charge thnt We npp.e-
bend dod WI, 6cud htm sue:. dclrcIauce ~ lie
sfal! ehose to ro1casaie him. II H. cause ends
shall do 70 him. But I'm not Without hope that
the nlnltteIa Of justice arc NJ t5c old apnstIc
.a ss 1 tns old a9o,ts ns W.
y hth brethren tiat tho mlnIstera OF justice nrc
tne ministers Of God; AID he says ~ tAay now:
minister of Justice beare.h uot thc sworu Ii yu!r
l5tPpstskGd apIlapAc
Mr. w11aa ssoGfSa e 81 1ver e,ou,e
case He SPOKE IN beaal Of u.c reapoodeuts, tnc
lnembcs1 Of the Church Court, and having slated
fsat s. s.ns hs II l9Sca " sa,s ez1sd
ytcw Of the case upon 1T Iegnl aspect Tbs few
preliminary remarks he cade were directed 10 the
uy Of the taet thai his clicnta were 10 The
anomalous position OF being withuut interest |
le1cept "a churrhnen) In the deciaou or tue !
ILL crst inquiry WAS IL to tho s.ns,ls OF the con.
plalna1L This ppon the principle governing |
1onr uf equity. ttat before relief will u granted
mus. come lnto court Eltl, clean hands. In fuls |
particular case It mad been sald that the com- |
Ilslnant bad been rerseeuted and oppressed, mud !
!5tai. Ths Question ahonid tese arise: u he |
1nIlfyf The bin ne1slet denies nor admits tue |
;9'Ts e xasS Gss1s ..d made no aEaes5 sneson %
Ven 'uade ~ to Whether Il tic % omiss,oa
,hnrged naa raade, IT was o. was not violation |
u laHt o. Inc CQUIEQ. IQe OILY allegation In
be bill H. t''at the complainant does no: believe
himself to have hetn guilty OF owencc CT Ipacon-
luct rendering hluself liable to trial To such IN
what could Chancellor sayf Hy the 1
iii il eppears tat uerc has been au arralvntarut
,cfure iho Church ior an 01euce ugains: the
-hurcr, uiId az complainant here, tie say1 be does
hongh1 manilnesS would hare dtctaLed deuiai Of !
he onlta!1u Charged, OF an nduisston and a1od- !
sDce, by setting up thas ihE Omission constituted |
q o1epee. He Thought this OMISSION In the hul
Next II sprcared that letters passed by which
here wos an extension Of time n which 10 selc-t
And Notification OF the time when the
Standing Committee wnnIf meet II complainant \
lealrct tatr aur Impartial I. tie saoal havetnes
,artes nn Teqe teinc,pd I ~ ne1 aoinv - 70 ihs n
saenicd with knowledge 10 TIC ret OF iho com.
llttee He rst Ac rattlcs ceoscu Gnt then
bought te might here rear his motion, Ec might
dDit TINT tie er.atEa al had lEactelGI tr1c.IlaEly
nd without due authority, aud yet this eourl
Ao1 That ne ls worthy.
He also argued that The brl ais, fails to show
aat b eny TtEnt is cntsnsezrd which Court o..
ptet 1. Is shown, and tho conl1Ecs for E,lasE Ii l
rot cIhlhl:eu, nor Is 1t stated whv, this coutfnc1
1istlns, II VIII Be jeoparltzed The blll does not
.dcca1ton Ior, and engagement In, and k1ary |
rom the nltnis!r! Is stated. hut rore Iaan this Is
oslt1on followed and loEs Of sa.ary, iute.fcrence
fou'd not ct this time be warranted inbnuch as
he I'LL docs not cay complainant will be deposeI.
~ only btItes probability Of zucn sentence,
llis Itohast ttfy being adranced upon 4. coorerss.
ION, the evidence concerning y whlch is conaIct,ny.
n this point the npQ!!cattott Is premature Tna
j infErtHce. !
lie Lcxt examined sao allegation us 10 Irrrrass.
sb,e 4 intnss and mui'r!sts! Of suits, eontsaatoE
fEulnH trom the Fccord that neither could occur,
El coEmcn,C1 upou the absence OF arcrnea:
Lut tEt1u Is no remedy !. law Eor the Wfpliss d.
n. ltrljnV that f0f 0f 1hfq fhc |