, 1869-01-12

v.,uel. =, w,tbou, the uc.rs Of compelling p..,
mini, md when he asks fos ar sRps0ps,ts as sna
Ief al plots ~ 10 rice. n Is fesalt Le soH ,ans
tanrs e. to remove tbs ca.e 70 tho Supreme ;;ouIs
q tho United asates. % the eHd tnat aassgSn has
Of tonnsn doubt .rd ~ 4@ous r.nes Ae II opin,oa
st lie BIZ nd On the b:rch, might b 70 exsa.,
Ied, tos1, perhaps. there would BE eone sIoTsa -.
Il der hI1ng u acs. But nothInK oE the klaa AtA
beer attempted. The pz-tlss oaTe contestea- ~ M
tpcceesini,5, al these points 20 o.tsn esfore tse
csnrts Of The Uni:ed s:a.es, thAt sh.y e. aavs aNS
rua Ioss 10 in:espose as = shield the orocr at
s,ate court A. has 3 eE seen. eneh osdst .s o.
AL ,,ss sss 'af ~ hops .as S sfs7 sss s
By feeling, must appear 70 b Banded
On . u tte ia1ac,. O1hes easss stmi'af to tasse
for. @ 10 h,s D ssate soae years slree. beeaate Z
the allseea interest of th.: judges of sao 'sr9is
oi fhe Cnased states for tha: di.tstes II me
qBe dof lnvclvsc. anc TINS thts Court mas peep
eor1 &C, I'd Htte he u1towaId controversy Ehtc9
has arisen httween the Conrts OF the u1ieed
IL crdeI to e1eeu,e The jadaments ra1dersd.
.ha ,ud9cs Of this court Wc5- ealied on 70 issue
psremptosy Wnt Of msndanes % PARTIES u7der
ZEE it 50 appropriate pfoeess, they, under
tne circumstances, ere unwilling TO 90 any
hnx % aass saoa, sna tss
in the ftst place, TO 60 betaIe me csnls oi ioaA
ard apcIy 70. removal Of m apparent ootaole
Of shfs Court tsa sat taas n1s
soas. Il he Gnited sta:es h. .iaes
vas rof 1esl one. snd that rae process snoald
| issue aud se executed. upou what principle -
Ii th.t tie Judges Of tets Court, sdmiris:eEns N
,hrse 'a.es nnatr The constr uttor oftns Tinted
stats, tie laws Of lows, nausto ev the mandates
| of.te eupscre rourt. and tue attendants. psr-
must no: eety ,sens Il Void sss o. e,tsaii
81. .,y sny . tram Of ,ea.onioe vtsmn
/ 414 NUG.$1.E E33 GCcHffe6 MER1htr hnt 4 writ
q a'saehntn Is ordered rule to ehow ca1sa
atonid oe ssrE. d on. the. ceferdaa's ii 1t did
not e!tSrls appeat that the deffnd4nr5 had deli b.
erateiy taker their line and rttolrtd 10 abide the
rtsul:s of viu1as1un Of 'te crae-s OF the Coart,
ass ossn b III. 81 7 + psa ss:
hss asrn Array s,:5.t1 .een she"o: Ard i weal3
Hoala :evs h>' no use aas 70 sss.
to ohey Erfnl orasr Of III Cost I md It sas7
penalty. And besides: a, pa1t,es 10 ~ ri: IL tas
y T1sy ;s ~ u
y; and DO Eot vish to BE- IN contempt of .a5,
but ar Q, eu. vi ful. cellbssass v1olsion ct law
t!tet eot.. naut, "a. therefore. w.tle tns1 Dis
: .anss *, - ~ : = ssaais:ea s Il, i =
ie.,s,ea Is ,Ss service Of ths aIts:auen: n III;
: ! case. Int though there does mt seem to hars
me1t. Of ,te Ftdefai EouTts eSpecsyd hI I1lh IL Il
Supreme Can't Of the United s'4see, yes II il u
te hoped Ill such Apprehenstocs are Rtouudi -
| r. utdes The law OF Long1tss this Court h1.
. ! prtclscly the faae power ovtr tbs pArIas II
Iowa az the Clrerit Couft Of thai district wuu1t
J have had II the easss had not been tra1>fertv d
: | am not iuseuncle Of tho Er1v.sv .
, | this ease, and have skated. eHha
at letctn. ,he rrasous uroa ,wtica 10
J action 1.-THE Court Il h4Ecd, and With TIA hop
:. that the cefends; t. MAJ recoce1dcr the clrcn0
stau. 90 o! their pos1uon Au1 act In CONFORMITY
: With law. Tbs principles presented arg esr1a
= ltshed bJ the nirh:s st iudlcis! authority in th
i couttry and iEds ed ar far1iltsr They hsse ees
r thus teferTrd to recanee they seen to he oishe
J unEGown. forgotten nr cepudtated By tho dern:
= ants abo thslt legal aoTisrrF.
O In granting the wElc VI attachment io this CAS-.
. l submit, in ccnciuslon, whether. altcr alt Ii
"a TsElons usiiels involved IN thi. l1ucstton h.y
of neE :. peaiecly htto.e tee Supreme Coufs Of Il
= Enih sls'ee. and - otisn d. tcsmlred again
c th. tfatnt set BY tho persons arL corpoTastos
= Of Iowa, who are pa1l:sso to suits II the Fcder
r g urte. II u not the auty OF those tart e.,
least a. to the e2st- In the courts OF the Uuite
4 Sss+s :, 10 yield obedience a. good citizens,
e tbs orders Of the hnal ass lstt Vi Tue law.