The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1869-03-19
ELS Il lNTELLIGENCER.
l. AIR, MD, MARCH 10, 1869.
The EirCnil E'Or.rf.


The Circuit Court for Hartford county adj
journed on Thursday last, after session of
five weeks. The jury, however, was dis
charged finally on Friday previous. Among
the civil cases tried were several of impor-
lance, and each of which occupied the court
for several days. During the session there
were los cases disposed of, besides the pas
snge Of It number Of orders and DEGREES in
ritancery.
Since our last report the following proceed
ings have taken place:
State VS.. West Dun, colored indicted for the
larceny of a turkey, the property of Amos
Osborn. Tried by jury; verdict guilty,
and sentenced to the Pcnitentary for one
for the State, Stump and Thomas for the
defendant
State VS.. Horace Royston, colored indict-
ed for the larceny of fifty pounds of flour,
ten pounds of honey and four turkeys, the
property of Gen. Geo. Cadwalader Tried
before n jury; verdict guilty, and sentenced
to the Penituntury for two years and two
months. Rutledge and Fulford for the State,
Gilbert and Stump for the defendant.
]. W. 5waurt VS.. ID. and c. Cunningham !;
action on the case; judgment by agreement.
A. II. jarrett for plaintiff, STREET. for defen-
dants.
State vs.William Freeman, colored intict-
al for receiving stolen goods, knowing the
S..nc to he stolen Tried by jury; verdict
'''' guilty. Rutledge for the State, Stump
H. Thomas for the defendant
State VS.. Benjamin Scott, colored indicted
with Horace Royston for the larceny of fifty
pounds Of -four ten pounds ofhoney and four
turkeys the property of Gen. Geo. Cadwala-
der. Tried by Il jury; verdict guilty, and
sentenced to the Penitentiary for two years
and two months. Rutledgc and Fulford for
the State, Gilbert and Stump for the defcn-
dant.
State vs.. Martin Wall; indicted for house
breaking in the day time, and for larceny
There are four indictments against the dcfen-
dant and ne fled af1idayits for removal in
each u ,.c forr cases, and they were all re-
moved t. Cecil county for trial. Rutlcdgc for
the State, Stump for defendant.
State VS.. John Tarry indicted with
Horace Wall for house breaking and larceny
There arc also four indictments against Tar
ry, of the same character as those against
Wall, and each of the four cases were re-
Cecil county fortrial Rutledge for the State,
Stump for defendant.
Curtis II. Stitlcr VS.. Shane Garnishee of
Hughes attachment on warrant; Judgment
for plaintiff on terms to be fled II. w. Ar
cher for plaintiff, Farnandis for defendant
II. G. Sitter VS.. Gilbert, Garnishce of
Hughes; attachment judgment for plaintiff
on terms to be filed. H. W. Archer for
plaintiff Farnandis for defendant
Curtis II. Sitter VS.. Hughes Garnishee of
Hughes; action of attachment; judgment
for plaintiff on terms to be filed H. w. Ar
cher for plaintiff, Farnandis for defendant
&. II. Sti!or VS.. Riston, garnishec ofIIughes;
action of attachment judgment for plaintiff,
on terms to DC filed H. w. Archer for plain
tiff Farnandis for defendant.
Z. Ii. Sitter vs. Wiley, Garnshcc of
Hughes; attachment judgment on terms to
be fled. Il. w. Archer for plaintiff, Farnan-
dis for defendant
ii. G. Sitter VS.. William Amos, Garnishee
of Hughes; attachment on warrant; judy
ment on terms to be filed. H. w. Archer for
plaintiff, Farandis for defendant.
Curtis II. Sitter VS.. F.. A. Amos Garnishee
OF Hughes; attachn cnt judgment for plain.
tiff on terms to be filed Ii. W. Archer for
plaintiff Farnands for defendant.