The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1869-02-16
REAsvJSGro.N RUTLsvD ~. A. ~
yL-sTTEo.N.


We puhiishod two weeks ago, a reported Do
cision o. Judge Nelson, cnjoniug the Rutland 4
Bennington Railroad FROM carrying into eject DE
act of our legislature permitting ihe said loaa o
Jun on the track u tho Rutland 4 Wahhimaton
Railroad 70 the West Rutland marble quarries
inst Wis, thai 1ecisioo was win appear from tho
fillowEg letter from Judge Poland. one Of tho
coanrel oi Me caa, published in he Montpelier
JagBni
y notice in youf paper an artelo purportinR q
give statement ~ deasiou by Judge Nelson,
on an application Tor a. injunction bg Tho Kqns-
balatr 4 Saratoga X. Il. Go. -. Tho Bennington
hntand II Il Ca. This Ia not . matter VI yery
general public interest bat II any public stale.
ment n Il s worth making | knoN y1n would
rrefe- 70 state the truth, Tho SCI n the YER
mont Legislature u last fall authorizing the
Bennington EulIaad l., II, ca. 10 rua up 10
the marble quarries Al West Itntland % Tho
track u the Rutland Washington road, rcquir.
cd tho managers 81 the RutlApd a Washington
road within thirty dsys after the passage Of tho
act, 70 establish rues and regulations 10 govern
their running and, In caro- they refuse 70 make
any, OF made tneh as were regarded uhrcasopa-
bic, then tho Bennington a Rutland Co. we're au
thoIfzed e. apps 20 ihc Supreme Court for tho
appointment Of Commissioners q establish such
regulations The Rensselaer, 4 saratoga Il. Il.
On. which IL to possessiYn IT the Ratland 4
Washington road, omitted during II. thirt3 days
10 rpHke any regulations and brought their bin
against The Rutland 4 Bennington Co.. praying
fof temporary tpluBpd9H g. rostraln theia from
FunniBg upon the Husband washnst8n track.
and that on Anal hearing such injupeton
Should he made perpetual The charter u the
Hutland 4 Washington Ga hss CLAUSE rescrs
ing % Che legislature the neht u sllsv any other
railroad - nss any part q ibrit ruad nndef such
regulations a. thai company sAoill prescribe.
II. srgumcui vas, tia, the issislaliue lad et.
cesdcd their power under Tile reservation, BE-
eaHsf hey lad provided way % ea'offo q
through the Court, i De Ralls s Washington
60 should feiufe 20 'uat seRaisasas, o. should
make sgei as sere Ja' gasansble
The answer va sppsrent hat lhe Ralland
, Washington Co., ~ refusing g niale ssg rtgt
iatinds ~ y masking suth could not h. Oh
eers I'd canld prevent any ether rosd from r1ns
ling nl.on their u uia.it lle reservation mere
HuilIi3 that ihe power g enforce 4 vas nsces.
sarflg implied ID tie reservation itssf Judge
koisoa refused 70 grant any iuiancton 70 restrain
the defendant from spp4irg b she Court b e.
tabiisb regulations, bot said that he thought
It was questionable ~hether the sst n iAsl Tall
did not 80 further than the reservation Ia tbs
charter warranted, H. ~osil gti,ia thB daFond
aHts irom running o. The baea Of CSC laatland 3
Eaahiugtaa road autii The hosrl1g The 81 n
lAsi fsil does not satb@ize tie D nlingtyn A
Rutland road 70 anief upoa d ather Rad uBsi
deal wisdom there ls Is ne aeIbl oSgfosssd -
Judge sslsea N tic saii8hY ~ The st u iast
fall, evrgg nsn csa lal& ~ aisassI " sound,
lbnn tae rcseffst.gu ia the charter n .hs Bat.
land s Washington O.. aAoaAls y lhss. tAat
tls risl4tafe may aaG.aft1e anstieF road ~
raa over iier xseAs Il tley el,e.ass q ist il, sad
"a athefpiSr I. +. POLAND
Washing I'm. Teb, 8 iasg