The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1868-11-12

had been admitted by the bin OF 1851. / asked the
Eoys aann = asked tn: Chancellor Of the
settle the question OF the compound householder
above ten pounds who had been admitted to the
upon this difference. that while the compound house
holder above ton pounds value u admitted those OF
Ssid Sisss osiOw ten pounds shall be excluded -
tnn Parliament surely win never consent and which
tne country can never approve" lCheersl What
words: He said that hs would settle all this CON-
!ortaoly enough and that he would do equal justice.
But what he really meant was equal injustice TO
both classes and he had the audacy to say that he
wouio repeal my clause IN the act OF 1854 clause
70 which Lord Russoll had consented, which Sir w.
roge wood had drawn up, which had passed both
houses without division and given the franchise to
y, 600 electors who had been before excluded The
that clause, 20 that no compounder, whether above
or DoioW ten pounds. should nave vote unless he
Conviction was tSat the thrd Clause Of -, Wa n
Ciays act OF lsol-tnat ID my ciause-had been in
terpolated In manner ana tnat II was dsapproved
Irecollect moving the clause, and, curousy enough,
the only person who raised any objection to 10 was
anything about the matter ana when he sat down
Inc clause was agreed 70. u tnon passed through
pssea to repeal It. Now, this was 's'n m pp0.
monstrous proposition, but the difiiculty was
not removed because II that clause were repealed
he was then In this position-that the bin. while II
pretended to be household surago bin ana 0reat
extension OF the franchise was cutting on the VOTES
OF the "a 900 occupiers whom that cause ~ nina
excuan9 under ns ns 20 w tsn
of Commons would erree to the bin IN that cohdti"r
and nromising to have that result Now tSers sya
con venient to have even one waT of sstt, M
diffculty d,auqhter.l He mrht hav9 raS
pure household suffrage, without any refer
would have been best. He might, Nccordine To tns
motion made In the House by Mr. Herbest Y s svS
mon the o. O6o ana might have exten1aIt ~
Ala 600 and Justice would have been done. or ~
nrreed To- do and WHOM he d which, was ~ arSSS
ne system q compoundng altogether ana who'll
BE- 20 this nSw that
WHICH show one Of two t6inSsOetSer KAT the1
know nothing about the matter or are yery careIess
Of the truth 0hssrs, "a and laughter Mr. Hods
sneakers on the bi Hewas one OF, our side who was
anxious to give no vote against any part Of the BIZ
~ h .houd mass thron@h Paament ad ~
nt,ca that IA the wnuS anu nc sars
a e .yse ~ sns tnes "a
,ntsv and at nnce ahol,Sbed said whar
that Was proposed ] wiII ten yoa arst what M
ana their orators IN the borourh and tHer neWs'
anu rsrs iav thu Hama ON aHu odstnr
III u,h~.ai ,,ortv f"r the ahoIItion ~ Observation-Disclosures
so ~ aha ,p1ic}on ~ az mmch anfrer,n0 ana nar
h iU e1 rest noonv thnmuandS nS thS ~
T{rvcIrChoyrr Won vroro ~ tho
Clpisis ~ ata A. ~ SoI ,, TUG h acs
p ~ svarv .vnrrdnr roen uha 'oS~
ss ~ 10 n h oaIIv ,hmp ny f rom
hs, " r rhn ohnny -. the nrst tJna -
Cniscu su LIZ Wiz ht1 nanr tn,s e. - M i :!
oAeIcise NE ,oS0 r1s h t1 Dv~, S - i~
tnas ue ,, u uu.,i 'nhs Sop hI .h;s Uause
was sovnstsu muuu Snar, au az noo 6taanso
sasc.. L. sIo a i6 h No., mvtse
noiueN unueL yen Pounus Moulu nav ueen "uWitleo
70 me lrancnlse oecanse tner9 tne System OF com.
Pounuhg never preSaneuj mniie IA DllnIngu aln, not
less no.eu loI I've aea toi ueaahg NJ less
III ~ u,
81 ~ unaeI Ten Pounus "Uuu nave uccn apsoutey
dlsirancniseu: lshsme', Ing oI, ~ PROPOSES Wouio
mol nave M AN . ~ an ~ ah ,t maiss
TO- enfranchised four times as many as the bill
orlginalI! lntenoeu W iiauclisc unaerstauu tnat
sol.Is =, a. s-- S ~. sSr,ss Ch,,rcS s..