Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1868-11-25

mr. nILL. OF Erie, moved to lay the mo-
tion upon the table. The House refused
The question then was upon reconsid-
Grafton of the vote by which the resolution
was adopted. The House refused to recon-
slider; yeas 80, nays AZ.
ADJOURNMENT.
When the House took a recess. it had un-
der consideration HI. j. r.. No. 90. relative
to adjournment. The discussion was con-
tinued.
Mr.. BAKER proceeded to offer further
reasons why the L gislature should not
now adjourn. after which,
Mr.. PARR demanGe tie previous ques-
ton. The demand was sustained; yeas
50, nays 31.a
The question then recurred upon the pas
sage of the resolutions as amended, upon
which the yeas and navs were had, and re-
sulted-years SO, nays 26.
Those who voted In the affirmative were
Messrs. Branch, Bronson, Brooke. Callen.
Garfield. Cannon, Carpenter Coleman,
Cusac, Denman, Dennis, Dickson, Dunn,
Eames, Gallup. Castor. Hare Hill of De-
tiance, Hill of Erie, Hill OF Fulton, Hord,
Howard, Hughes of Butler. Hughes of
Highland. johnson, Jones, Kahn, Kemp.
kepnett, Kennon, Lawrence, Lee, McMor-
ran, Moffett, Moore, Newman, Nichol
Odell, Parker, Parks, Parr, Rough, Ruken-
brod, Rutter, Saylor, Scott of Warren,
Sherwin, Sisler, Skaats, Stewart, Stickney,
Swetland,- Thompson of Colnmbiana. Ul-
lery,. Warnking, Warren, Wolf Wood
| Speaker.
Those who voted in the negative were
| Messrs. Acker, Anderson, Baker, Ball, Bel
Vile, Behmer, Cockerill, Dilworth, Finley,
Fitch, Gordon, Headley, Kerr of Fayette
| Kerr of Jefferson. Lewton, Mann, Neal
Read, Robinson, Ross, Scott of Hamilton,
Shaw, Thompson of Stark, Walling, Will
son, Worth. .z.
So theresolution was adopted. rl
Mr.. CALLEN moved to reconsider the
vote by which the resolution was adopted
M. tCALLEN proceeded to urge the
reason why the resolution should be re-
considered, and why the Legislature should
not now. acjourn. He urged that there
was business of such nature as required
the Immediate attention OF the Legislature
and that body could not escape the respon-
sibility.
-Mr. HILL, of Defiance, deprecated the
course of argument pursued by the gentle
man who preceded him. Mr.. Hill denied
| that there was any coalition between the
Republicans and Democrats about ad-
journing. He was for adjourning on prin-
ciple, and because be thought it best for
the 'Stateiand the people. llai .aA si.-d q &
Mr.. SISLER said il 1t was proposed to
hoVC hAiiNofC oloWh sHiSC, Woulo OC
opposed to adjournment. uisy - t-z-i ,a2iav
Mr.. SCOTT, of Warren, thought no
member would be entitled tc mileage ex-
cept at a regular session, which this was
not.
Mr.. HEADLEY moved that the House
do now adjourn. The motion was lost
yeas %, nays "a. tir 7sit 9Goq.si b.
Mr.. BALL explained his course in re-
gard to adjournment. He deplored the
personal allusions which had been drawn
from gentlemen during the discussion.
Mr.ELEWTON thought the reason why
the Legislature adjourned last spring TO
November was, because impeachment was
pending, and vacancy was anticipated in
adjournment unwise; he also thought an
adjournment at this ltime would be equally
unwise. .E'1i besos-9 -atsi ir.-Fiiisi sic117o cd
Mr.. HUGHES. of Highland, moved to
lay the motion to reconsider on the table.
CENTRAL LUNATIc ASYLUM. . lsns
The CHAIR appointed as members OF
the joint committee on the Central Lunatie
Asylum on the part of the House, Messrs.
Parr. Scott, of. Warren, Ball, johnson and
Neal. s1.' ~ 45sf o. Hs-'. ,i5a5 st' y
-eaEl, CATTLE DISEASE. s.o.t.a ~ -eae
The House concurred in Senate amend
ment to 81. J. r. No. 81 in relation Co ap-
pointing joint committee on said SUBJ
ject. IA - y = ssss Y ~
r.,-. APPROPRIATION BILL. ,-z --,.-,..
Mr.GASTON, on leave, from the COM
mittee on Finance, reported partial ap-
bill for the year 1868. in ac-
cordance with tie suggestion of Governor
Hayes, in his message, which was read
first and second time under a suspension
of the rules, and,
On motion of MI. HUGHES, ofzHigh-
land; ordered-to be engrossed at the Clerks
desk, and read third time now. Tie bill
passed-yeas "a, nays2. l.3.-55 b.. -.a5
I lojAlsaoaHo9 Ex-Gov. TOD dar -s27i
J Mr.. BROOKE, on leave, offered the fol-
lowing resolutions, which were adopted:
WHEREAS, In the dispensation of Divine
called by death from our midst on the 18th
day of November, 1868, and
I WHEREAS, 1t is proper that we, the Rep
of the people, who mourn his
loss, and participate with them. in their
sorrow, should express our regard for the
memory of the honored dead; therefore,
Resolued, By the House of Representa-
lives of the State of Ohio, That in the death
ot Ex-Governor Tod, our State and nation
have sustained the loss of an able and pat
riotic citizen, whose eminent services and
influence, as Chief Executive
.f the State, during the, most threatening
period Of our ma innal history, did much to
perpetuate tire Union OF our fathers. and
whose patriotic t,fforrs in that direction Sc
cured for him an exalted position in the
history of our country, and an immortali-
y as enduring as the results he aided in se-
curing. -, ii ~. III tr. - 5--
Resolued, That we are deeply panied by
his sad event, yet we are grateful that
here was given us man whose virtue
md benevolence as a neighbor and
'itizen, whose high-toned nature as man,
whose craftsmanship and political sagaci-
~ will prove a beacon and guide to our
selves and future generations.
Resolved, That these resolutions be
spread upon the journal, and the Speaker
s hereby requested to transmit copy of
he same to the family of the deceased.
Resofued, That the House do now ad-
ourn. --st oc.a q =-so 7l 1yT.l