New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-12-04
ton would have sprung from Its grave. Government


must interfere somewhere.
There is reason 10 believe that there was great
confusion OF opinion as to the exact point mott1,Icd
which decided in this nstancc--but not sc,iIru
and Enthusiastically dened-by the Emperor i''iii
self IN council at COmpegne on tilday' 10Y, W -
was decided that tho eight should he P5 Ia donc
and Of course condemned. What sHo"iu - 10 - ~.
with the journalists and subscribers VINO topN Hpi IL
subscription at later date was not declusUt mrse
is moi possible even to-day to say WIN 49, 10
is to be pursued, hardly to say Wnat oo'i9 - me"
been pursued toward them. lie ITmP' VI, - vyns
disturbed till day before yesterday ~ VI" hd NOT
seized The Siccle and tho y0u"Gl &c oIio nv 49,
oe sol 2eJ &c lote os last night All three OF lhc'o
daily papers have done exactly tnc same !lf 10
week past viz receive and publish Dauuih suo'i''P
n : rposiblo rs vet to say whether the decision
OF the Cont on Saturday, based on l'lo eloiIhiw
tiat tho eight condemned had heen .euliH
-, TO- "mou,uyersr and keeping mp lteH-
gopces say. acting in combination WIN
culp.Le political object IN wow VIEWS 10 po ~, ~
trr'rfrd as directly applicable to lie IcmPs; Whe.neI
II appiicble to lie 1erpS it is applicable TO othsr
parcIs whether if to them, yet further 10 INC SUI
scribers whether, IN fine, 1t IS hehcclOfl DN IoH
law n criminal Otlcuse TO unite III pubnc hlOacIIp
tioa TO set up graves0ne That IS what TINS StoDs
Government las come To-. $685., :. A.,
ast Friday afternoon lie GdElOs published, IN tho
first column, IN large doube-ieaGed character, an
intensely sensational bIef article 10 the erect tu
Government had discovered an immense ToNoIl-
tiOnmy conspiracy. extending AT over Il ..q'
plotted by known leaders. employing the press meet,
ngs the spirit of the old parties, manifestations ana
all Other means-of which the Baudn movement
but 4 sign ana pfctcNt; mat OoNtihHi'Ht Wa
resolved 10 apply the most rigorous measures 10 its
suppression but would not include the press IN IT'S
exceptional seventies unless the press lent lisef 90
the encouragement of the dangerous passions IN
question" The same paper insisted on the poSHlnSo
correctness OF the statements, nocking AT sclni-o
cial and dcfying an official denial. , IL,
II was not till this morning that the Aopufpr dlH
deny thcr tIuth rot till yesterday that the editor oil
the G0aois was called on by the authority 10 answer
amy questions on the subject. To any one iamIlar
with the condition Of the public press IN France ana
with the conditions Of the GGHiOis, which IS jOlna
skcptical in politics. without convictions and IN
sort TO be let" by the day for transient organ
grinding Of any new tune, il needs 10 argument to
prove the eStreme probability, that tue s'hsato''m
article was inspired NOT officially ot course, bu ny an
official authority. There has been great te arc
somewhere IN high quarters. BY how many 81 the
Ministers and in what respective degree by tho more
timorous Tor logical it was INDUCED H. we cont
know That The editor of the GdHioiS sEcnli nave
invented the article iu quoS ion, got 1t up IN Ao H's
play style it wgs published IN. and so boldly ino's'n
ON lis accuracy next day, "oat Of his own mead u
too cxtlayaeant proposition To be SUSTAINED I3' I"
moment Not the holGcSt of IrcrChoci.ors' sun u -
pol tico-skepcal French editor, would DC so iCoi'
hardy.