Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-12-19
THE COUBTS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND CIR
CUT CoURTs-HOa. CoRnGAg T. Triqg,
presjding.-A motion was made and
! granted to set aside the forfeiture in the
case of the United States vs. G. ". +.
Brooke, upon his showing sufficient ex-
euse for his absence.
The continued case Of Mrs. DR.. Bailey
vs.. st. Louis Mutual Life Insurance com
psny, was thea taken Up. The arguments
Of Messrs. Heisksll aud Gen. Humes
were heard aud CLOSED to-day. We re-
fraia from making any remarks relative
to the merits of the case until the verdict
Of the jury Is givec,
Tine following order in reference TO
b~Gnk-up;s was is7ued by his honor Judge
TTigg, on Yesterday.
Or6ereG, Fiat hereafter in ali cases OF
bankruptcy where assets, zeal or pers0u-
al, have come into the hands of the as
siglse QneneumbeTsd, the assignee may
proceed TO sell the same ia accordance
with the provisions or the set and gener-
al orders, without any special order there
for IN eRch casa,
And IL is further ordered, That In sl
cases where the fees hsFe bsen OF msy
be limited, to $50, by order Of the court,
if the assignee shall realize any fald
HUH LLC EnsG III 2@5GA-a - AaACE nASCs RC-
longing to such estates, ne shall apply
the same to the payment CT the full
amount OF costs aud FEES due therein 10
the several officers Of the bankrupt court.
CRIMINAL CoURT.-L. 3. Bigelo,c,
Jgdge, etg.-Phe case % the State VS.
Henry Caldwell, indicted Tor house
breaking, occupied the attention OF the
Court ali day on yesterday. The iary
had not, up 70 late hour last night,
agreed upon q verdi5t.
CgATcERv COURT nl. II Smith,
ChGncetg0T.-CCurJ stands adjourned IN
til Monday morning, when the following
calendar will be called for tEisl:
FS5 GrigsSy vs Street.
4Se Gsorge vs. Wood.
ISL Johnston VS. LucsdG.
ass Wright vs. Craig.
4S9 Msscham Va MOsby.
$50 Beaslsy VS. Jackson.
49l DelOaeh vs. Dan.
1872 Battle VS. Brown.
494 Treadwell " MCKson.
4S3 E~ig!0gtOn IS Cites.
49T Ab3rerOmhie VS. AoerCrOnbie.
ASS Pittmsn VS. Muiford.
499 Leonard vs. same.
500 Psgg VS. LGOney,
SOP Chrisp VS. Barry.
SOB Nolea vs. Goldsmith.
904 Armcur Vs Vim.
500 Bingham W Hsiinan.
500 FOreytn vs. Wiiliford.
SCI Achis0n VS. Ward.
sos Markham VS. Heiienshsde.
500 Green VS. Ward.
80 k9ssell Manufacturing Company VS.
HOlieasbsde.
3il C0Tsrd vs. b0ru.
10
5l3 McCJmHs vs. Smith.
5l4 Fsrrow vs. F4TT0w,
SIS Jones vs. Miller. /
BIC Carleton VS. Miller,
81 L4abert yS Hstis.
Sls Lsavitt vs Colt,
l2n Clark VS. 5pivey,
12l 5tovsy vs. Perkins.
)22 Aydlett vs. Thatcher.
j24 James We Eppes.
s25 Mitchell vs. Jackson.
~ Tucker We Core,
I&9 CGcke vs. Barrett.
so Alexander VS. Rose.
The CLERK and Master will take &C
count to-day IN ne Gaze Of Parker VS..
ct al.
MUNICIPAL COURT, @. ". Wcldrda.
adge.-IesteEd2y's Calendar was en-
disposed OF.
To-day being Oiotioa DAY, the motions
90 motion docket viii be called
md heard, after which the following
.ases will be taken Up for trial
40S. Roberts Va Sidss ct al.
$50. Smith vs-McLean.
Law CoURT-R s. Lee, Jadge.-Yes-
erday's calender was not disposed Of.
'he untTied cases on the an will be
AIKEN up during the first OF the week.
To-day is motion day. The motion
loeket viii be reeGlarLv calIed.