The national Republican., 1868-05-14

1. c-.- 80. r..,.. r.t. .u.,
net a. o'eioei ysstsrdsy.
rh. er.on.n, ~ nran M met,an ~ .au,,
yahn n srr,.t, ~ hi, wss rssuwsa ""''
a M. M.rsicr e,iisd nv the s,sssiion osihs eour,
sIu.,y. a. ~ ~ iu,,sdlsSion of IN" Lar 10
tshe b.ii ia its diseretion. "
NJ Riddle 1 DO moi dispus, the Iur,sd,s,,on
ofth. nnn,t esse 4, Grsnsh,s syi snnit ssam,s
Reporss iuiIv snstslns II.
Tne t,onrp Ism ylsd vou ayncs sor 10 4. .
question on which fhSd some aoubt
not vel eome IN. misht differ witS him mn1 in ne
con.t rnction ofths IL ~ snd hs ,.a,,id ~ @
sors nrefsr thst NJ. Ms,,ict .hoy,S snhndths.
apshoSatss AZ, as,,tS e the s,, court S
.how thst ne inSsss ~ yss snss,sma Gn,ss ~
ths D,striot ma IS,isdiotion IL sssns Ssii NJ
sc.rcsly fslt y nses..s,y % .iisae . ths i.ets
Ne .xs,e,s. ~ ths Gnr,t,. xxsa..,aen W =
with nearly al OF which the Court Wa Nmii.
lar; But there was scon:id.fstion whies va.
might exercise A Iesitimate inSucpce upon s tSe
exercise of the courtis discretion. The n,is.
oner was DOOR; he had in common With his
brother ana after a ANAL inheritsncs ,1hich
Ssd Srown into an unhsppv notorietv I'M.
inhefitsnce was dened with 4 dsb{ - Man
n Wa NAV would entirelv exhsust II Ths
III. sist., .sotie NM. h.s,t.d ~ snn
narted h.r.sif hs hsr nxS sre,t,ons IL thRs
city' Whsteyep means his family posssssed
and eostiv triai 10. aithoaes oounss, aid 9ss oo{
voiuntesy n, tss a.Sence' A. hss MAJ unt,niv
stated. And he. himseif. had tster ths esss
only sissi fuii invs.tis..ion and with . faiI
uotbina th.S .wn.ctsd n1,h,nyy ""a fsoe'oo
In accordsnce with What they deemed tbeir
duty. and In the spirit which beionss 10 the
nrofsssion' thcv Ma moi stanned lin thsir
.bnr mi ~ ~ nsnded mcnryn IN az .a,a,,., sas
Of the csse ~ fbeir client for vhcn they az
their reputst,on and he csUsc ~ ipst,ss IN IN.
Tor want 81 fsv dolisrs. Ths comin. trIsi
So,,is a,so he costiv ons for .I,hn,,.h ~
did NOT eSnect eounsei Secs. the %itnss.e. IN
vsf thsIr Sosra ~ the hnt.i IA NJ a,N. ~
paid Sy x: ,ss n ,hs view
to use his personal efforts TO secure funds for
His own defence. As TO his pbysieai oonditiop.
NJ M; p Bradley would bring Into soSit ne phy.I:
health. n had been oisimeS tSat the n,i.osss
was excluded from bali by renson of the mss.
nituds Of the crime eharsed. ' -"s
He knew OF no distinotions I'm mu,d.r a.
claimed nv the distriot attornev sna VA 80,
known as murdran mSonai,m, az which NJ tbs osuoes i%s
ins to be- such opiaions snJ csr,s..inn.
were the bnrstinr of the ontcr bnss N ths
oxuberapt Genius Of tho SistrIct sttn,ne1
s,nsr Issa than the conclusions Of disciplined
| ffhe csn.e NJ ;u,tic. oo,,a .,gs, nm no..,s,.
| detriment IN The necnsed hc samitte1 4 - h.ii
FOR The eourt could rsonirs snnh n 70 oa.,,
wouh secvr. hsvnnS nssapdx .caue suen sum a.
.ncs of the der.nd.n IA shu snc attSna- n
isf, oDsn 'pe ros ,sn s,ii Ana une case Was thus
a..n, ~ open ior NJ .ne .a ,ues eTerelse oi humane
% a,screHoai q. ne noPea tns Contt would exer-
sse r. the =, w.n ~ cnsnitaoio eonsidsra-
uSas s RIadIs .hs suhiSehnss .aiS h o. namsaiy:
| 81 IL. h.n saS ~ VA mere rssner oeoause
OF tne absence o. the Distriot Attorney than
~ ~ ypss,.'ti peon, inteu NJ .n IN ,ne mattcr A TO
had ssrefaiir an asm,nsS eIi M 70 .n. s.nt osi ne
ing upon M sne suhclec, ana rena 70 the court ex.
" st om suen .a.utSs. ne aio not desire
| n,s.sas tte, I, anu not snAt ne saw the
MI ''e' A"orneJ In eour'Ae "ouid yield to
Inc Court. VIII exercise ny judgment In
,n,.esto uHom , ns RreTios.e Ts .na nave the
Pomes W Auls " psis iho .utnorlies Wnich
cont,ss tn my n s,. 70 .ne ecnelusion
this power: Til, power, however, I: one to
os exereised Win great cireumspection and
Nun iuuieisi leIuctnhco. All o. tne authori-
es cNeo so aemonisn me, ana Ior the obvious
Iesson mat tne aeeusahon OF MURDER 10
snmnsn.st,nr U nd n maj ,, 'fe ne sw San oetsin no
stake, which I. the life Of the psrty accused.
Gssc may oItea Arse "a whlch court Will
H.. ,ee' cseo upon 70 eheISise ms power, and In
IN, tS Gnss neLore al ne shouia nave NO hesita.
case Tsi sesm to Iu;tiiy IL;
Lnis ease, Dy the sppiicauon and with the
oonsent OF counsellor from my view Of the
esse from ,ne oenen i AN eompened 70 treat
seipyhss heen defes,sd ~ me ~ hent OF eonn-
lapse Of time sny long period hy consson.n wy nns
| OF which the defendant n 10 sufrss. And sysn
| if there were ID IL NOT 70 be dlsruissd IN ,ks
history Of the case that II 10 . very grave one.