New-York tribune., 1868-04-18
THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.
Continued from Third Page.

Confined
.7-ca6Inet at any time Of an act of removali The
& bi law on the subject the act OF March 2, 1867 re
onring him to inform the Secretary OF the treasury i1
order that the person removed coHd %Hd in. iD
t with that act Mr. Butler called attention TO te
Lei that while the counsel excepted 10 ms of the
Tabpet they had not said that the CaDlnet ne
consulted an Laa dea act how could it be evidenco He
Mr. ButlerD willing to admit that az that one, he
president has odeaTw nS Stanton was already out quietly
St hat had meant 10 do Ia case secretary sthton
should Stveen him aud the President about force,
Nugb Inc could not remember what IL was. 1ey nsH.
I tbs as Of little moment but II So they must AUNT
admit tions 10 other members OF the Cabinet, or n-
I've themselves In inconsistency he was SUN uuaoio
Aongnish any difference between the declarations 10
r'T and those 20 Welles, other than that one was
robnet officer and the other was not Mmle ~ was au
dvce but they propose to put In what the PRESIDENT
Thought then he would DO. A.. ....,,.,.,,. -,
n Sherman should he misrcpresented or misconceved
n was that when something was SAID about force the
tr and that ali the ausiOn TO force was made by the
witness himself the President having conveyed no hint
"a his mind that force was TO be used. .
The eCHIEFJUSTICE expressed the opinion that the
evidence was admissible part OF transaction that
roner to aid in forming an enlightened judgment In re-
gard to the intent of the President
Mr. CoNNEss csned Tor the reading OF the written
of the counsel in relation to the testimony OF FER
Senator SUMNER-what was the vote of the Senate on
thatf
The Secretary read the vote: Yeas, 9; Nays 81.
Senator TRUMBULIl-I would like 10 know how the
Senator from Massachusetts ir sunner voteo upon IT,
senator Howardput the following resolution in writing
20 the counsel for the President
evidence which the counsel for the Aecuod
oaer the allegation contained In the suces d paeh
men How Does AGect the OF any one OF the chs
Mr. EVARTS-It is enough TO say probably In answer
the question that 10 bears the question or intent
with which the act char ged done 1t bears upon the
conspiracy article and 1t bears the eleventh article
Mr. WILSON, enc OF the Manageable question was
asked by member OF the Senate 20 the date OF the
conversation between the President and Mr. Perrin. IL
was the 2lst. - - =,
the question presents itself TO his mind The question on
which the Senate ruled yesterday not In reference to
e removal Of Mr.. Stanton as the ChefJustoe under
rood but in reference to the Immediate ap-
ponfinent Of successor by the Presidents
ending the name Of Mr. Ewing The Ques-
son to-day relates TO the intention OF the President
n the emoya OF Mr.. Stanton and II relates 10 com
,nnnIcation made his Cabinet after the departmental
bnsness had closed and before the Cabinet had separa
Ted The Chief is clearly peaking with emphasis
of opinion that that part Of the transaction and that
IN entirely proper to take this evidence INTO cOnsldera
fion AS showing the intent in the Presidents mind
Thesenate voted the question OF admitting the ties
fimOpy as follows: