New-York tribune., 1868-04-09

or we're Won ever promised any kind Of reward for such
inhuencef A. I have never received anything except
my legitimate fees in reference cases; those Judge Bar
nard sends of his own accord. Q Did you never
know that he was going to send them to youi A
He may have told me so in conversation; Judge
Jones used TO occupy rooms with me at No
lOe Broadway; Mr.. Tappan has an office there
still Judge Barnard was never associated IN business
with me; before he elected Recorder had offices
together andI think for time after. but was then
to 81 600 the largest single that passed pre-
sme that our account now balanced had interest
Blankman. O. Did you appear TO the public A. Not
that know Of @ Did the profession know IT. A. do
Recorder Smith. Mr.. Jones, and Judge Barnard; my
position was that OF general counse appeared in court
O. What did you do to your fee A. There is suit
now pending for that matter; shall tell you nothing
OF this examination into private matters Mr. Brady SAID
he wished to show that Mr. Haskn who had set out with
Barnard had received money property for using that
Influence Mr.. Haskn declined to answer further Mr.;
A. Twenty-six years ago. q. Did you find any au-
thorty for witness refusing to answer & gnes9h ed nn
10 degrade or crminate him Mr.. Clark here rose ana
mter9osed an objection after which MI bT1ey So le
cut up aud carved the Christy estate for
the purpose Of using nnende hof YIN ros impeT
nen He said that he did take fee to appear be-
fore Judge Barnard in any case Mr. Brady sad % that
incurred the malignant hostility Of five men, but that
would not deter him from pursuing hs proper course
ton using your Influence with the Court A. No, SIR
Were you ever IdT n IA any M %eS iSr s MIR
Haskin here applied TO Judge Barnard 10 DC excused
Judge Barnard said that If he had controversy pend
ing, II might be proper not TO answer. - .,
Mr.. Brady knew Of no such rule. @. We're you counsel
in the controversy between the Merchants Union Ex-
press Company and the other Express Company last sum
mer a. No S i was Hos cPGe SaS his with
it when Judge Barnard staying at my mouse a Ked
Bank and we out fishing he told me that YOU ana
q Wpre o
do which deprived OF large fees; discussed hc case
with him and told him that there Of public
Importance where no Judge could afford help friend.
and that the press were on the side OF the
Union; counsel for neither side Q. is MI Coleman
an Intimate friend yours a. think he is; saw him
two three days ago. can't say whether at my once OF
his @ DO you any thing of the distribution OF fees In
another Judge than Judge Barnardgettlng 10000
money have you received the references sent You
by Judge BaTnardl A. That's none Of your business; IL
Is an mpertinent question. e. Have you kept an ae-
curae account of moneys received by you or services as
referee, counselor attorney or otherwise from pares III
suits since Judge Barnard has been on the bench A. lat
is mpertiuent question, and decline TO answerH
O. Have you ever been present when an application was
made to Judge Barnard out OF Court 19r an aIo~aGeI
A. have no knowledge of such fact e. We're you ever
present when Judge Barnard was aped TO ior an az al,
lowance A. The only case that remember VAS M IN tne
Devn case, I'm which you were interested in the allow
auce q. DO you mean the allowances made to mel y
After considerations no; the allowance was nau nc
defense Q. Did You eyerRnOw OF an allowance OF from
$1,000 s. 900 being made TO man In case In which he
had no earthly connection either as counsel party OF at
tOTney. by Judge Barnard A Know Ol no such case.
q
Mr.. Fields application TO You In this matter
A. suppose the modification OF the Injunction ana the
assumption that from my intimate relations with Judge
Barnard. could obtain IL; when said that a Judge
could afford to friend, meant where he had
discretionary power in the appointment OF referee;
Mr.. Field desired 10 give retainer III THIS matter;
he told points in the lie did not tell me tat
he had already applied 10 the Judge for the modification
the order did with regard 10 Judge Barnard,
he is too smart let out - did say he mprudent
i'm the places TO which he WENT he had been the day be
fore OsgOOds Office had never seen Judge Barnard
about this Injunction before that showed
him the modified order and told him the
statement Mr. Field had made 10 me. g. WIN You pro-
duce an account from your books and papers OF your re-
ceps from fees and references since Judge Barnard has
will not Q. VIII you produce the checks or stubbs of
checks that You have paid to Judge Barnard a. III
can find them will correcting himself on tins exam
inatOnl no, Sir will not. Re-dIect-Mr. Field IN
formed me that Judge Barnard would be DETAINED, aud
charges of all kinds Taked up against him here ana IN
the legislature but that from the personal relations he
had had with Judge Barnard he himself opposed TO
newal of the fight against Judge Barnard, and
1t wOuld be the biggest fight the country had
ever seen. Re-cross-I told him was
case of hardship he stated would Judge Barnard
and he would doubt, modify IL If IL were right; Mi
Field stated that was, that Of these bonds were
held by bona tide holders; had general idea OF the
character Of the injunction. O. Why, II You are such
sent Mr. Fields threas A. Mr.. Field did not throw out
threat his purpose TO avoid the NTH ana DIRT that
since been thrown great many In this matter
Mr. Field then called 10 the stand, but Judge Bar
nard declined with the matter furtler and al
jOurned until to-day at p IN.