Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1868-05-25

IN commercial, in portance. EtfTTEr9RG
tsTF -77--T----s - = 49, r Z I Id,
li Cta CIT CoURr The following isthe con-
,usjon of s Saturdays proceedings: VI vh8J
LAW SrpH.--Thomas Shields, Il Co. vs.. r..
HeGemeny-in debt s2judg aeat against defen-
daut for 1882, with interest from January
Dist 1868, till paid and costs. .a.2e a- ,g. {. =
Elizabeth Bsgot's administrator VS.. Leonard
cook-in case-judgment against plaintiff Tor
costs. CG2 &I 49, @&.y
-smoe. & Perry ssys. zAlezandria Loadoun
and Hampshire Railroad Company in case
Judgment against defendant Tor 1896 "a, with
interest from May lst, 1851, till paid snd costs.
AIRY E. Keith, VS., Edward Birming ham--ilupo
Elizabeth Smiths heirs vs.: AFRO
Cbsse-in ejjectment- land VIM. Il. FoWle vs..
John ,Dowling-iu ejectment-removed to the
u. 8. District Court. 80, ao.I
Accounts Of jaigor and Jonathan Ward were
allowed.
lCHANcBar 1Dss-Mary Mason vs.. Robt:
r Mason, Got was decreel that the de-
fsudant pay to plaintiff s2,26a so, by way of
oommutatiou of dover, 10 the land in the pro,
ceedings mentioned. - t's.S". E. -,I- -
The A. & w. R.. r. Co. vs. the W., A. a.
G.RfR.a 20. This causo having been argued
BY counsel, the Court reserved its decision until
sometime during vacation.
Mary King vs., John r. Wooster-on motion
". J. Waterman was made defendant, and 1t
vas decreed that he pay to plaintiff $l4 per
.nnnum during her life, commencing June 2Sth,
1868. r4a
.Chss FL. Javins, ct ux., ct al, vs.. Thomp-
son Javips's administrator, ct alt was DE-
creed that the resl estate In the bill mentioned
be sold by G. E. Stuart and F. L. Smith, Com
missoners.
Elisabeth Corse (by nextfriend) vs.. BeVerleys
executors-a decree Of sale. .1a-
Henry Blondheim vs.. Geo. W. Carson, ct al.
"a decree for tho sale OF the property IN bill
mentioned, by Geo. W.sBrent, commissioner.
CordeIia Wsters (by next friend) vs.. Eliza
beth Hunter, ct als-cause referred to Com,
missioner in Chancery. 80
Daniel Lucas vs.. Clarissa Lucas decree
divorcing the plaintiff from the defendant was
made. ara
John &. Smith, ct al., vs.. w. D. Massey, ct
ala decree for sale of property, by G. b. Stu
art and E. M. Lowe, Commissioners.
John Sodep, ct u1., VS.. r. Johnston, ct al.
1t was decreed that unless the plaintiffs pay
to defendant the sum of 5000, with interest
from November lst, 1865, and costs, within go
days, the property be sold by R. Johnston,
Commissioner.
Charlotte Jacobs vs.. Washington 8 executors
this cause was referred to alCommissioner 10
Chsncery.
Frederick,S. Barreda vs.. Geo. D. ,Fowle''s
executors "a decree for sale OF property, by S.
F. Beach Commissioner. .-,.n
Mary King vs.. Samuel Dsvaughn-it was
decreed that defendant pay topaintiff the sum
Of $l6 per annum, commencing June %, 1861
C.tharine Butts VS.. N 4. Butts, ct al
this cause was referred to Cor missioner in
Chancery. 1as,4 lsg e,'s-1 ~"
R. B. Brent vs. w. 9. Yeaton, ct alt
vas decreed that Ann S. Powell, one of the de-
tendants, pay to plaintiff s1,6]450.
Elisabeth E. Tucker vs.. John Tucker, ct al.
-sdccree for sale Of property by D. L. Smoot.
Benz. Plain VS.. Anne Plain, OF ala decree
for sale Of property byD. L. smoot, Comm'r
Mary 4. O,ton vs.. VIM. A. Moore, ct al
twas decrced that if defendant does not pay
hplaintif within 60 days the sum Of S4O0, with
interest from April I'd, 1860, till paid, and
costs, the property be sold by D. L. Smoot,
Commissioner.
The Court adjourned till Court in course.
Dp-as-Ss-
Nror,,> 49, k.T-,nr,o1ro1 D,r;no