New-York tribune., 1868-06-06
CIVIL
In Marine Court, General Term, a number of
decisions rendered.


In Marine Court, General Term, q number of
decisions was rendered.
The Supreme Court Circuit had on its Calendar
yesterday S5 short which disposed Of as fol
Term; "a were adjourned; was referred was sent
back to the General Calendar; had been previously
tried and ready but not tried FOR want Of
time.
United States Deputy Marshal Chas. McCay
arrested Wm Mullee yesterday by virtue OF warrant
issued by Judge Batchord accusing him Of contempt Of
Court manufacturing india rubber combs in violation
OF Injunction obtained against him by POppenhusen
Konig. He will be brought up for punishment this
morning
In the United States District Court, in Ad-
miray the collision OF Ellen Kiley, owner Of the
Baltic was decided The Court decides that both
were TO blame, and orders decree apportionlng the
damage between bOth with reference 10 ascertain Tue
amount
In the Bankruptcy Court in London the case
| of W. IL. Palmer otherwise known at Robert Heller,
bankrupt was described as formerly Of Washington.
United States aud afterward of the Metropolitan Hotel
clan London He attributes his bankruptcy to having
been sued by Messrs; Riggs Co. Of Washington. The
debts are s2665, and the creditors live principally at
NeW-YOrk and Washington. The meeting for examlna-
tion and discharge VIII be held On the 18th OF june
! n the Supreme Court, General Term, deci-
sion was given yesterday in the Of Marsh ag Peters
aud Others which action for Partition The prop
was sold auction and brought s2l575 The Court MADE
cent Go S Oh s Whole amoa u the sale and to the defend
ants allowance OF per cent on the amount oi tnei
i'm he nronerfy was bnt oneifth Tie defendants OBJ
eced that the allowance should have been based on the
plaintiff s nterest-not the whole property that the
3O9th Section allowed the Court In It's discretion To make
further allowance 10 any person not exceeding per cent
on the OF the recovery claim. This clearly
per cent on the recovery OF such person. ha IS
in this one-th OF the property The rule adopted
I'm the order In question would II there were ~ persons
allow the whole estate to be granted away extra allow
ances The Court without requiring tae respondent % 70
argue the matter affirmed the order Of the Court DeIOW
In the U. s. District Court, in Bankruptcy +,
yesterday, application In the case OF Edward Bge
low, David Bigelow and Nathan kellogg, banTupts on
an directing the SALE by the bank OF certain stocks
belonging the above named bankrupts w:ch the BANK
claims 10 hold security Tor the lndeDtedhees OI tne
bankrupts toI The application was founded upon pc
tton setting forth that the bank Is creditor OF the
bankTupts 10 the amount OF sjls0 as security IOr WS
II holds certain stocks pledged by the banTupts the
value Of which uncertaln and as to which value le
assignee in bankruptcy declines to agree ana the pet
toueTs therefore prayed for order 70 sell the stocks IN
accordance with the provisions OF the 2yth section
uously opposed by the assignee in bankruptcy
principally on the ground that II was PIenatne,
masmuch as the petitioners had taken no stsps
whatever exhibit prove their claims IN the manner
required by the 22d section Of the BankPt aet Inc Inc
Court sustained the views OF the assignee al" ueeu ne
application.
In the Supreme Court Chambers, before
Justice Ingrahan, the transactions OF Matthew west
brook who previously been before the Courts were
up side motion IN suit by Alr. Robert X James
From Mr Jamess complaint 1t would appear that west
brook induced him buy for $500 an interest IN ms
business which he then represented 10 be tea business
that James afcrward found the business !? pe asTRqe
and fried 10 get his money back, but Couldn't without
SUIT. MI Nestbrook was arrested ana hed 70 pan IN ~
$500. He offered to bail but Mr.. T. W Dodge objected
that the suretles good for nothing 10 snow lhe
utter swindle OF Mr. WestbrooRs business, nus own az
vertisemcnts were produced. Among them al
vertisements OF article which the DEFEND
| ant declines TO describe, advertisements iOr
agents advertisements Of sale OF watches at
onehfh OF their honest price Advertisements to send the
name OF future wIfo and husband. Advertisements OF
books which, II the books not obscene are intended
u the idea that they are so; advertisements OF
gft enterprise 81, with prizes OF $4,000 Advertise
ments OF ladies' tOet-bOx, and OF the Continental Tea
Co An advertisement OF AN interesting imitation OF
s. greenbacks which the advertiser are extensive
liz lottery tickets gift enterprise certificates aud
which any man swap for dog or even trade Tor
his dinner - another of II c saieS OF United States
bonds photographed with such accuracy that no one
could possibly tell them from the genuine without certain
marks aud descriptions, which we send IN separate en-
yelop." a. address in confidence ne undersigned"
And st another whose purpose hardly 10 be charac
terzed any person sending the bona Qde name and
posOce address Of four young men and four young La
dies residing separately, will receive" &c, DC. The
Court decided that OF the suretes Insufficient
and refused the bail.