The New Orleans crescent. [volume] (New Orleans, La.) 1866-1869, 1868-05-02
-
LEGAL NOTICES.


THE STATE OF LoUIsIANA-FTFra DISTRICT
Court ef New orlesns-Mrs. A. East DR.. L. East.
her HusbAnd-No. 1880.
I HEREBY certify. that on the 1!t i, day day, OF
r. puay' iSs Jaegnen ~ Ss s md aSuses following
to-wit: ,,,.,s.
th snd upon producing 10 proof Of be-
demand and considering that the Law and evidence are IN Ia
Il i sdjuSeed and deereed the Judgment BY dsful.
there he IN favor q plaintiff aTHbea Long and
against the defendant augustus L. Rss her husband de-
thar SAID plaintiff do recover o. the defendant the Of
six Thousand Nine Hundred and Esssy ss Sos
pas Of this suit and that plaintiff be authorised to
AZ administer her own separate psrSpnernN pro
perry without the intervention Of her husband
Judgment rendered III. l7th Of February; 1858
'D'ST 0Ssn ss1'o inc '''' c CHARLES LEAUMoST
In testimony whereof have hsrsunto my haadi and
sxed the seal of the said court at the city Of ,ss Orleans
second year Of the Of the United States
A. u. BERsUDY, Deputy Clerk,
ETAT DE LA LoUISIANE-CINQUIEME CoUR DE
District de la Nouvsne Oreans-Madame A East vs. lie
doeteur A. L. East son mari---So 1880
lie, PAR LIE PRESENT CEWTIFIE, que
lie l7ene de evr0r 1868 ugement tut rendu dams
les affairs ct dams les mos ct figures suivan s
Sur motion de evy les avoca pour la plantiye
dams les procedures la cour des Dreuves de
demand consderant que la o ct evidence son en- AVeus
est sdusss ct decree qu ugemsn default soft don,
lie llieme cOurant soil mAlntenant
Judgement en- pantve Arabea Long Ell contre 10
eendai Augustus L. East mari decretent une separa
az Gn "a ds $500 ant pour
que lie dee1dsn sot Passr 0a les i oa
sa propriete sans linteryention du dit mari.
Jugemeni sgns lie q fevrisE lsS s., ,p.rvoxr
En- temoigne jai alike ma main de la dit
II De Nore Seignsur 1855 lie quasrevngt
oOuEeme aimee de lindePsndenss des ,tats unis
STATE OF LoUIslANA-THIRD DISTRICT COURT
Of New oreans-Mrs. Catherine Fattery James Mol
10y, her Husband-No. 1878.
HFRERY CERTIFY, on the esth day OF
March. 1868 Judgment rendered In this Court IN the
following entitled suit in the words and figures ioio"ns'
motion Of g. H. Brsughn, Of counsel for plaintiff and
upon producing TO the court due proof Of PLAINTIFF
tered in this case the ith be confirmed AID
msde mai aha I'm a T b IL bssby rendered in
favor Of the plaintiff Mrs catherine Flstter vile o. James
N,oy and against the defendant James Mooy, her hus-
Rendered March 2sth, 1868
In testimony whereof have set my hand and affixed the
saN Of Apr in the year Of our Lord 1858 the ninety
second of the indepenee1ee q ne United states ,
ETAT DE LA LoUTSIANE-TRolSIEME CoUR DE
District de la Nouvele Oreans-Madame Catherine Flat
terry vs. James MollOy mari-NO. 25.7sa
IEPAB LIE PRESENT CERTIFIE, sue lie
2Seme jour de 1868 ugement tut rendu en- eette
cour e tire, les 5 ct les figures savor:
motion de O. H. Braughn de cOnse pour le Paintve
les procedures ct Ia eoar de la demaade dn
plantive, -.
Ii est ordonne aduge decree lie ugemen default
"a soft mAntenant cOlrme ct rendu
final jugment de separation de Il propeie soft ct
Ia meme est par preseDt sit Judgement favour dc Ia
pagnant Madame Catherine Flatfery femme de James Mol
10y defendant james Mooy, mari svec tou;
les trails pay es
Renou Mars lie % 1888
Siene Avril lie 1858. -
temoigne, axee main ct sceau de Ia ditto cour
dams la VILE de la Nouvee-OTeans, lie 3eme jour davri
en- annee de Hotre Segneur mil hut soxsnte hu
et lie ouatIe vingt dOuzeme de rinderendence de-
ktats-Unis. Z. A. LlNAUDAlS
Depute Grefier.