The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1868-02-21
The Circuit Court for Hartford
County.

Judges Bateman and Yellott; A. L. Jar
rett, Clerk VIM. Young, Sheriff; P FL.
Rutledge, States Attorney.
The Grand Jury were discharged on Sat-
urday last During their session of six days
they found 1s bills of indictment one for re-
sisting and assaulting an officer two for as
sault and battery ten for larceny one for
horse stealing; three for selling merchandise
without license, and one for maliciousy
shooting horse.
Since our last report the following cases
have been disposed of:
State VS.. VIM. Dorsey, negro indicted for
larceny arraigned and plead guilty and
on account of his youth, was sentenced to
the penitentiary for year and months
Rutledge for the State, Stump for defence
State VS.. VIM. Dorsey, negro indicted for
larceny and on account of his youth, was
sentenced to the penitentiary for year and
months. Rutledge for the State, Stump for
defence.
State VS. VIM. Dorsey, negro indicted
for larceny and on account of his youth,
was sentenced to the penitentiary for year
and months. Rutledge for the State, Stump
for defence.
David German VS.. John Bordly; appeal
from Justice of the Peace appeal dismissed,
Hopkins for appellant, no appearance for APP
pellee.
Isaac Deckman VS.. John Deckman ap-
peal from Justice of the Peace appeal dis.
missed at appellants suggestion. Hopkins
for appellant, no appearance for appellee.
State vs. Nathan Gilbert indicted for as
sault and battery jury trial verdict not
guilty. Rutledge for the State, Hopkins
and Dallam for defence.
State VS. Robert Kelley indicted for lar
ceny confessed the plea of guilty senten-
ced to the penitentiary for 1 year and 6
months. Rutledge for the State, Maynadier
and Fulford for defence
State VS.. Robert Kelley indicted for larce-
ny stet entered by the State. Rutledge for.
the State, Maynadier and Fulford for defence
State VS., Robert Kelley; indicted for lar
ceny; stct entered by the State Rutledgc
for the State, Maynadier and Fulford for de-
dence.
State VS.. Thomas Saunders indicted for
an assault and battery jury trial verdict not
guilty. Rutledge for the State, Stump and
Maynadier for defence.
| State VS.. Thomas Saunders indicted for
an assault and battery stet entered by the
Stota pn41nG,rn For t1,o
Maynadier for defence
| State vs.. Thomas Saunders indicted for
an assault and battery stet entered by the
State. Rutledge for the State, Stump and
Maynadier for defence
State vs.. Alfred Green, negro indicted for
an assault and battery jury trial verdict
guilty, but insane. Rutledge for the State,
Jarrett for defence.
VIM. Y Day VS.. John Price; action on
the case, and enormously reported last
week, as a judgment for. plaintiff. Was
continued TO the May term by consent
of parties.
State VS.. B. F. Carroll; indicted for selling
liquor on Sunday. Defendant demurred to
the indictment; demurrer sustained. Rut-
ledge for the State Jarrett and Stump for de-
fence.
State VS.. Francis Young indicted for as
saulting an officer. Jury trial; verdict guilty
of common assault, with recommendation
of mercy Sentenced to the county Jail for
one month. Rutledge for the State, Thomas
| and HOnkins for defence
State VS.. B. F. Carroll; indicted for selling
liquor on Sunday Defendant demurred to
the indictment; demurrer sustained Rut-
ledge for the State, Jarrett and Stump for de-
fence.
State VS.. B. T. Carroll; indicted for selling
liquor on Sunday. Defendant demurred to
the Indictment; demurrer sustained Rut-
ledge for the State, Jarrett and Stump for de-
| fence.
State VS.. George Cook; indicted for selling
goods without license. Defence demurred to
the indictment, and demurrer sustained Rut-
ledge for the State, Stump and Galloway for
defence
State VS.. George Cook; indicted for selling
goods without license. Defendant demurred
to Indictment, and demurrer sustained Rut-
ledge for the State, Stump and Galloway for
defence.
State VS.. George Cook: indicted for selling
goods without license. Defendant demurred
to the Indictment and demurrer sustained
kutledge for the State, Stump and Galloway
for defence.
The court was in session eight days, and
during its sitting disposed of seventy cases.
---e-s--