New-York tribune., 1868-01-18
no lamp. on the avsnuc were lighted though the ensiA
carried "A bright 0hf

carried bright light
Judge Blatchford rendered an opinion yea
erday in the OF the Government against tue sIea
ship Manhattan This vessel Is owned III oreat bruusI
and Il Is claimed that the captain anu 0wnesS ~ .es
ships Ind vessels and made themselves liable 10 tne nes
second section Of said act does not apply steamships
consequently, the Manhattan was not Liable
In the Albany Court Of Appeals, the case OF
Was argued by Mr. crtenden for receiver and AIr smith
for plaintiff The bank became insolyent in April last.
state law il being contended that the State law
cts with The Federal statue, that tie limited state.
have prior lien the assets, and that The bank
not u foreign corporation. Decision not yet gwen.
In the Superior Court, before Judge Mcneil,
in the case of Ienry Heiser ag John Green Presdsns
pamy motion was made to strike out part OF the de-
ndants as irrelevant the action IS for segya @
defense is general denial OF all allegations ANA an aver
that the plaintiff had on several occasions usoa
violent language toward defendant Decision reserved
The Bennehof Run Petroleum Company -
sued By H. Atwood to recover payment Tor certais
leases Of oil lands in ycnanco County Pennsyyana sola
Durham, and James NJ Clark. The price was $4,000 TO
bc paid In nonthy nstallments OF 800 Finally M tns
fhe part of j. W Atwood. Durham. and Clark. and
moved non-suit. Judge James ordered reference 70
determine the question OF fraud, but denied the motion
10 non-suit
The Black Crook injunction case was before
the United states Circuit Court In New-Oreans recently
counsel submitted their report experts which wac
the effect that there no infringement OF right
under thc laws OF Congress To secure righ "
property picture or engraving OF any lhVen0n snoaa
be made aud filed in the Patent ofhee ana III the sinn
sonan Institution a. sefe,s ee IN =, ns nss IN bas
Europe and America especially the TRANSFORMATION scene
the close OF the spectacle which was years
received, and the petition for an Injunction denied
| In the Kings County Supreme Court, yester.
day. before Judge Gilbert g. DE Haven Jones SUED heny
| Hurlburt. James BOomer and Frederick Mornngway,
employees OF the New-York and Sew-Hayen kslirose ,
Women 70 the m station Of the Eaiiroad Company in New
York. and while the platform with QUO OF tnem ana
Svs Who fold hi he could not enter without tickes
for himself Plaintiff had no ticket Dut had putoAasoa
three for the women. Angry words were exchanged,
when Hurburt and Boonier approached and also told
him that he could not go into the car without tokeS
and brutslly beaten. lie claimed 5000 damages The
| jury gave him 5000
| In the case of the Florence Sewing Machine
Company agt WIN. X. WariDrd and another, the jury
found for the plaintiff assessing the value OF property as
ssGer ssTns e West
waried To him number Of machines These he stored
psrson who had lent hun 5000 to Whom he delivered TIA
receipt, and who, having borrowed like sum from the
| eeipt and gave II In their to them. The
Company conteRded that they had never parted with as
goods their and should recover them by sus
| in trOyer against the defaulting agent
A posthunous child Eliza T. Giles, has taken
and others 10 recover her share OF fathers property.
the whole Of which had been sold uader mortgage In
May 1885, the plaintiffs father became the owner OF prop
ery In Thiriy-thrdst which he gave mortgage ot
s.O In October IsO he died and 10 the early part o.
the following year the mortgage was forecosed NO sur
plus remained Mr. Giles left wife and SIX children.
Six months after his DEATH and subsequent 10 the fore
closure Of the mortgage. bis widow was Delivered ot
child who Is tho present Plaintiff Now the property N
very valuable and the plaintiff claims that although the
equity df redemption Of her mother and the SIX othes
Children f2rec9,ed, hers wa. not as she was not
seventh OF the property hers in law and its Income
from the day OF sale less oneseventh OF the amount q
mort gage and interest and taxes and interest anu yaue
0s permanent improvements and interest J4dgo Jsmes
decided IN favor OF the psiDn ordering areieee !" IA
| just the apportionment of Der claim'
The case of Ethan Allen, appellant, agt. Rol
lin White aud others, respondents. was before tno ou
preme Court at Washington. This appeal from the Cs
cult Court OF Massachusetts, originated thus ~ apt
| lnprOy 0ents In replacing firearms, and the othe
respondents subsequently purchased from said Wnit<
the right TO make and vend such improved arms
a right which they we're not slow TO enforce, sinc<
from January, 1855 they had manufactured and sold
2jOOO of them Allen, the appellant, however. do
MED the right OF the respondents TO patent make, o.
yend those improved reeaters and brought Tie ofisn
suit in the Massachusetts, Circuit Court In order TO 70
cover damages Tor infringement OF his pryileges end
when defeated in the Circuit he appealed TO the Suprel
Court The facts OF Aliens are 20 the following enect
He stated that he commenced his experiments in b42
By 1882 had achieved such that be regarded
his invention perfected but that account OF bels
then in tho employment OF Col Colt. and involved IN
contract from which he could not disengage himself
elected TO obtain his patent whether this neglect Oh
the part OF the appellant Will not lead TO his discomntur
at Washington, well in Massachusetts,, remains
be known IL s at all events. the point on which his op
moments lay peculiar stress aud on whtch the Ciroos
Court, doubtless, rested It's decision. 7- s.- ---
THE CRIMINAL COURTS.
! In Justice Bedforii's Court. Jersey City, yes
tens Charles Doloaner was held for bah on the cbsrg