New-York tribune., 1868-03-20

M. Iieid-On what paper IS inc motion iaugi ma We w
ture Of speech OF tho Court but no affidavit OF service
on the order 70 show cause.
Mr. Feit-The greater part OF the papers reau te not
served. j should like TO know why they were read
Mr CAqrk-There are motions. read most OF these
afdavits in answer to the second notion.
Mr. FFeld-We bring on no motion What mouon 90
Judge Ba1nard-I understand the motion FOR a Ee-
MT Ftela-I believe the order 20 show cause, have
only 10 state that motion that these papers came INTO
our hands at twenty minutes to ten We have an ALL
dayit of service on MI sche OF Judge Cerkes order OF
this morning, which has been indeed admitted by me
Court duty done; but one word more 10 dsaDue
the minds Of any ono who may have Listened 10 the TRADE
Of this morning, 10 the prOprey OF this action TINS
Injunction ordinary exercise Of the jurisdiction
OF the court OF equity 10 prevent me Ell % 0l
winch have arisen Do anticipated growing out OF
one transaction 1t was on this theory that the New
10 the legality Of certain issues ot stock Here Ie
question On the Side II Is claimed that
the of certain stock unauhOriLed on the othcr
the Company and their counsel believe they are legal
So with tho guarantee Of bonds which are made
mart OF the litigation. They should all be
included IN our suit We have included every person as
submit that this proper and respectful pIoseedse
The injunction is not extraordinary except SO Tar "s
Justice OF this Court being party can We ] U
But Judges after all, men, and may be made pTuo
10 suit Whether EShtiuiy or wIohsilty III vi E.
the result OILY can decide ~ s hot su, In ne
thing that parties should be enjOined from sushls u th9
Alnid0n suit there $50 defendants al Iesf;ned
from sueiDc. Where receiver Is appoeu an @ S1S "e
stopped. duty is done wnen we nave prOluoe0 10
that order violates the law and IN court OF Jaw that
MIR Jus.ice barnard stated that In far concerned
tho last order OF Mr Justice Ccrhe nc ad Dcth ih!oe
nv majority Of his colleagues that 50 far as i restrained
his action It was invalid far as concerns his own 10
tcrest iu the matter any one Who read tese
would that the charge was utterly fdlse ne shou
ard at once perfect the appointing Mr. Osgood Re
cever, approve his security when offered Ihe Court
neys we're busy settling the order. Meanwhile Mr. lDcw
the County Clerk and Mt. BeaInsh, the deputy Caam
Will ul
The order was then settled as follows: .,..
phe S9wng s Is copy % of & ae &fGSr SRleeS c5I
On The snd original complaint ta, 3c', & ,ll o ', 1A
reading fng proofo service Of te the Bic RtNsI
@PsS l. s s '' s sS IT, isrs ss rI ad & e alac o. i
al seh' Non ,'9o,PS & .l 1"r,eJ s.o
one s'cw cause granted By DIS Ioor yu,es bo M % open oge
and a'o rrof ~ service e uanoer r mentioned
ses% cause agl 81 ''s ] l ' ,, @ l,p'y5 - 4si ara
ea and Fe the IAN d1 Of March
so, % he aree.o. ofse Es laI Cc@paaS and ileT counsel.
show cause togeef WITH ihe sopt Q, ,aia - ~ 'as '
ave-, bah to h, Seid On Tie siih at BAD bel ser,ed
n td toe amount of Nc Da had leeo tred 100 aad 'e
mssns Of ,s order ard Raasy Cynpau touga -
ss director and tat sad counsel were ha ara there ch4 upon -
S es sarei sp@ we're al ed SJ the Court whether be psru
M
return o Ae Serf Of the City 'td County Of Eesiofs sn aS
Ibs made IN open eo 20 g'S1& & %i o. ,s a cr. Of
G. 's g,y % Thompson i and J. BsSSoh ba,s directors Of
Company for all alleged eoaierg q 's Court N d,SSeSf an o,i
S ne saG Jsbn 5 E,riose jsres Fix jr Gob Henry
11ouT,Oa. j. C Bancroft DAVIS could not hs to'nd
3 5 Dir i,S SSa" ilss AN ~ t .s bs .e S i ro5s ee
sac o6er ar order having BY hs Hosoc Thomas W
R.iScr. saa ,.,yipr he sr Of az ori, ieou aat tr.
fln . Sl.t 8 uol fSD 1885, q eic sooa notice
.s order An4 an olef la4 ite seI,'e 90 's
tie I the Era Essy The lsh dJ Of Nne Inst
he s'5s , ose a ~ orj,r II I' iaor yae l. sol
vacated ald dnoane Tie mo,oa - a.a't ,l up X at' m
reaang ding srmericlt oer Of NJ Jli.e B,rr'r %
thereof george ~ iEeo 90 'one for he bn7
p Got-ay "a & s1e 90 Ma @ t 81. Sr ' spt's,j
k Az Leals ,oglss - T.. ins pl'a'd a1G w @ sl,j o.
reading Prof ,srT service the 80 i,,3.i Sh.u e
18th March aa eret sra rs coa doth lede tt's
% voS Sroey, ana of loTtse r. CsrF Ciae, l. Rapso
Taro vsrlsroe ari william e.tou Of counsel o hr pauud
opposing Onesi: la 'ai. netoh - y.ea.e Aa -
ne contained order d NJ Jlatis Cleric a'.i Msrch is
ps A ss d.aSnr sh. aoa he additional rare. ie
e.at in supplemental COMPLIANT An lnrite orel i,t
Sefe5y .5poSl receiver o. al singular roei q 5000
l the Rde r'asy coaIaHy r5-1at.t y eae ;
ParS SrJ ist,d o. ise III 4 March i si ieeeis o 80
or FISH Bden Co. gd go cse5, & o. ~ 49, e.rts' ~ Gs e,
q h po-eei Of 1000 '.e' i stock o, ,aa S-fs, Heh & s'1
ri, ,' t.S a. GS .Sld y n, E,,e,e coan.se thereof &
p, lie 9 q I.rb ~ ss3 q is lr..e,ds q tie ,d
% fl ' t i ti % 10 snI aISr e G G,oree Oood sl Ne
t hereS ieiati g q ihe proeeei u al 90 so't 3a e
by sai Coup, mcrlrd for i'ns ~ coa'er'n ~ rrr
sa Sic ie be-, M cr oerssr dagos a sal Of al es 'toc,
80 '1 ~ tE Ii s iIi -, ii NV cI a., f- I'D Receiver
o. ssaiy IN DE sla q n ne ora Of 1Si t. 'ss
sprogei ofy 4 Juct ;s Court ut 70 be fe tie
gace % Of iSe zen & 'As ECi ~ i & W % . .'. t pf
ss q eae D. " Gpo',. Eye,.ei drg, 81 =. 's 80 ,1 @ '9 E 70
fs 5,S S,yI ,5 q. ~, s nd ,, e ., n 81 r ,e% ,
control, The .sd grocesis o. a'y P'ri hereof Z" 'ny
aq aia ,a,y any par, te,e zen coa~rtg DO e'.
herenbefole AID al eteel' voucher s'ahe prop
% r custo5y or 11der he control Of t De-o Or cG r. sy
colseos u this Court e srd be h h,r.7 t".ea reits q a
agents aid I'm Railway ad each q ttoo
tbe or eile shall BE- slms-bel Is referee
srp.r before bin ana that hey srl escl u neT DO aIm ., el
he sio, ard herein ucrio, creation j.
& ' f 10 $ Gs% l'5s 6s 81 Ss % 1' & 9fs5; ] ,. S' S'
ing sy & Tis o,,f & ss ave go Or a @ % cS5,e or 5S, .
touching the qs,oiy possession eo5Iol situation ard ,o .n tn,r
Of such vsee be produced before ha Win Ience to ts
disposition proceeds t.of the i,olr ia
r Ad condition of such proceeds .l 81 any ter eui" o
yete ordered that said referee tpor' o. t
proceedings bad before HIN and the
which m be om me to time paid over TO TIE aid tensr aid the
deposit thercoy bin heroinle directed; Tat tie plaintiff
have leave to apFy to this Coari IRON tine to tine m further ereooss
u TIE premises. GgoRoE &. BARNARD.
When the order was finally settled Mr.. Field read
short affidavit OF Mr. Eaton, the attorney OF the Com
pauy in the suit the effect that they belle ycd that the
order unauthorized and Intended ~ good faith
appeal from it, and asked the Court for order staying
proceedings pending the appeal.
Judge Barnard said: The defendants have been in
gross contempt Of the Court and Their proceedings have
been the opinion OF the Presiding Justice. such the
position OF the docs not warrant The motion Is