Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-06-25
TIRE COURTS.

CHANqERY COURT Fg7g. H. Smith,
CtdHeell0r.-The DEGREES and orders en-
tered on yesterday were as follows:
ditiOnally,
Brannon vs. b aunOn, supercedeas.
Whlts vs. Horton, reference renewed.
q q vs. Jones, dover disallowed.
SlciA eight VS. Dill, new parties made
johnston vs. +ucadO, re. 0rence renewed.
belcAer vs. ickeTsham, new parties made.
Btoomlr gdals V Petit, on priority.
ROUNDS vs. Memphis GayCSO Gas CQrupanv
motion TO d. miss. -
Pritch RI vs. Graves, IeIers nee.
Calhoun VS. tiraL ger,
James VS. Petit, new c'aimants
lyeTton vs. Slower, report confirmed.
VI CJmos vs. LOOnev, consent order
johnson V Ashan, motion for receiver
Crisp vs. Park, motion o dissolve Injunction
Hiiiman vs. Foster, amendment dled.
higgins vs. Fisher. construction Of sale.
thompson vs. Scomeck, final decree
Mardoek VS. Church, furtAer time allowed.
Murdoch vs. Turiey, -"
same Us BrilkleE, "
same rs Leath, "
Aordock " Lincoln, further time allowed.
Jenkens VS. JOnson. further time allowed
JenkeAs vs. Mul ply, furth az time allowed
enkehs vs. Lehman, leave to defend.
Love vs. " iIIiams demu rer overruled.
fsge vs. Com. Bank OF Tenn, new PARTIES al
Thom-s vs. saGarans, demurrer overru ed.
Drtt " M-U. Hotel 60, order 70 ornuaassioBers
Al and Z. of Il. vs. a. Q, r. r, Co., in1upction
modified
shOrey VS. DeLoach, rule as to defendants.
The cases set for trial to-day are as
follows:
Davis VS. Peplow.
Roam VS. Moore.
GraW vs. Graw.
IrOtter VS. Dllard
Fleece VS. Rogers.
How VS. AldrIdge
The cases decided by the Chancellor on
yesterday are: Knox vs. Csnovan, de-
murrer over uled; Msydweu VS. Mayd-
well, exceptions disaIlowed and sale.
Court meets to-day at the usual hour.
The Clerk and Master will take ga ac-
count to-day in tie case of Hughes vs.
Hughes.
MUNICIPAL C1JRT- Geo. W. Wa5drGa,
J,tdge.-The basi cess transacted on yes-
terday was as follows:
In the case Of the State vs.. McCulIoeh
forfeitures were taken against defendant
and securities.
The Jury, in the case of the State VS..
B. Church, returned verdict of not
guilty.
The cases set for trial to-day are
n55 to ll57 The State VS. W. H. Hudgeps
1904 10 1907 same vs. jas. Van BrycElfn
1903 Same vs. Jas. Creighton
to t3o same VS. Albert Beer
14l to $50 same vs. Kate Stoner
100 Same VS. Solomon Hail
1893 Same VS. f. l.. Warner.
li23 Same VS. "A. j. Keller
llii same VS. James Maydvell,
1896 to l5l0 same VS. Nancy McGfnnjS
l55s 10 laSz same VS. MolIie GetIis
SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT Georoe ID
Reeves, J'sdge.-On yesterday Judge
Phelan made the final argument in the
contested election cases of Garviu vs..
Mclean, and Woodward VS.. Wicker
sham, in behalf OF the present incum-
bents. Judge Phelan's speech was quite
an able one. A large crowd OF promi-
nent Radicals and negroes attended the
Courtroom during the delivery of the
Judges argument on behalf OF their
elected friends. The attendance of the
sable crowd in the Circuit Courtroom
was quite an unusual occurrence. In
the other eeurtroOms In the city this
has become quite nuisance. To-day
will be motion day in this Court.
CRIMINAL CoURT = Vim. Hunter.
Judge. The argument of the counsel in
the case Of the State vs.. John GariD,
murder, closed last evening. A verdict
will probably be rendered to-day.
IUKA SPRINGS HoTEL.-The enter
prisiDg young gentlemen who have
taken charge Of this House make such
decided changes in its appearance and
keeping, as to render it one Of the most
attractive Summer resorts in the South.
This evening grand ball is to be given,
the occasion being the opening Of " the
season. Arrangements having been
made with the Memphis and Charleston
Railroad, by which fare Is reduced one
half, and tickets good unit. the 27th inst.
our citizens have aspleDdid opportunity
OF enjoying visit to Iuka air, a few
DAYS, st very little cost.
Buainess, visiting and Wedding Cards
- n