Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-12-23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND CIR
CUT CoURT5-HO5. Connduy F. TriQq
pTesidi1g.-Ebe case Of Richardson VS.
Bishop Wss taken Up 10y appointment OF
Yesterday. 1t appears the defendant
Bishop seized upon some of his CIVIL
property on Presidents Island, through
the ETecdmeB'S Bureau, under attach
ment, ia the custody of the plaintiff
that at tie same time he carried off for.
chilly come OF the plaintiffs property, tc
the amount OF $50. The Court substan-
tally charged the jury that it was u clear
case Of tEespass, without leave or license,
and The jury, after u short retirement,
found 8 verdict OF vindiotiye damages &c
the amount Of $3.50. CIapp and Vance
for plaintiff, Kerr and Wescott for the
defense.
40 oEdeE was entered allowing w. Y.
CIcode 10 dispose OF q psfeel of land In
Marshall county, Miss, belonging to 5
bankrupt and after paying the purchase
money to distribute pro rata the re.
nasiDGeF 70 the TemEiniIg creditors.
Some other cases were set for trial on
yesterday, bus owing 10 the absence of
jurers they were postponed.
CRIMINAL CoURT.lJ. E. BigslOW,
JUdge-Iotioas for new trials and in
arrest OF Judgment, entered in the follow
i"g eases, will be heard and determined
O. to-day. Attorneys interested on
either side must be in attendance /:
Stale Ys Frcnk GATH, larceny.
Same - " I Clark, 90.
Same vs. Robert johnson, do.
Same rs Harry CaidVsll, hOussbresking.
Law C0URT-H s. lee, Jt1dge.-But
very few cases on yesterdays calendar
were DISPOSED OF. No. 1896 TSs on trial
when Court adjourned. This case will
5e resumed &c eooa as Court convenes to-
day, after which the following ealsndRr
wii be taken up:
1887 Aver & CO gs Wade.
l45S BFinkeThof vs. same.
1889 Manning & Co VS. same.
1871 Beard, use, etc, vg Saint, ex'T.
1871 Frank vs. Saell ct al.
1913 Taylor, McEWeB & Blew VS. Rob-
erts.
1879 Wilkersou vs. Armstrong.
1880 Hunt vs. Rodner, sdm'r.
1852 Hamilton Us Mckinney ct al.
1883 Wolcott. Smith & Go vs. King.
1854 Watson, trustee, s.DOnaldson ct al.
1855 Same ys same.
1856 Same vs same.
1851 Same vs. anne
1883 W&ddsil VS. Ogden ct al.
1851 m>il vs. HcLaETeSl.
1897 johnson vs. Pitman ct al.
1916 Comfy W Joyce.
1916 Allen e5 81 VS. Coggsweli.
1918 Style rs Anderson.
1876 Anderson ct ri vs. Brooks.
1902 Townsend vs. HiEckle ct al.
1875 Fraims vs. Mayor and Aldermen of
Memphis.
1549 Andersen & GAY VS. Walker.
1857 Montroy vs. Robinson, Trustee, eft al.
MUNICIPALC oURT-GEO. ". WaEGTGz,
JWdge.-IO.dsy is the last day of the
December term, and ia set apart exciu-
siv5ly for the hearing OF motions for new
trials. Tusrs were few cases on yester-
days calendar disposed OF. The cases
remaining untrisd on the same, and not
specially set, win, together with those
cases heretofore specially set for to-day,
be taken 10 on the first day Of the Jsnu-
airy term, 1869.
CHANCERY COURT.-FB n III. Smith,
ChGaeelior.-The calendar OF yesterday
on motions, pleas ssd demurrers was
concluded. To-day the following cases
will be called for hearing, tO,wit
sos Bingham vs. Mailman.
5I2 Campbell VS. Nelson.
go CLARK vs. Spivsy.
525 Mitchell VS. Jackson.
523 Winchester VS. Smith.
534 Hill vs. Mix.
535 Mitchell vs. Word.
536 McNsir vs Gay.
537 Cloth Us Mempham.
53S Coeke vs. Smith.
$40 Slaughter VS. Warner.
Sal Willis Ms0n VS. Paine.