The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1868-09-02
The Distinruished ncnd.


tlero>se escaped from The burning train unln-
jured, Lord and La ~ Farnham and Sir Nicholas
ChinDery we're burued to death.
Lord Farnham was the seven h baron OF that
title in the peerage Of Ireland and was born IN
Dublln on August 0, 1893. On December 3, 1928
! he was married to the Hon Anua Frances
Esther youngest daughter OF the twenty second
Lord Despenctr. This lady was sixtv-three years
of age at the time of her death. His ordsnlu,
who was for some time one OF the representatives
OF Cavan county in the Bouse OF Commons,
succeeded his iatOer in the title in 1888, and in
the following year was elected one OF the repre-
sentative peers OF Ireland. The deceased peer
who was knight OF st. Pa rcK, leaves no issue
and his brother, the Hon. Somerset Ricuard
Maxwell, who is now IN his sixty. fifth year.
succe eds to the title.
The Rev. SIR Nicholas Chinnery, who also
was passenger IN one OF the 'front.' carriages OF
the ilI.iated ua'n, was born in 1904. He was
educated at Queens College, Cambridge, where
he graduated NJ, A. in 1929. Sir Nicholas, who
was formerly as istaut minister az Trinliy Cha
pei, Conduit stree, Hano er square, succeeded
bis ia ber rs third ba1ouet in 1910, and was
married IN 1843 to ADDe, daue .er of ne late
Rev. John Vernon, OF Cavan, In de,ault OF an
heir ma e the title becomes extiLct.
Rights of Americans Abroad.
The London Express of August 81, reuarks:-
The CORE, pol dence wn ch mas 0as sed between
the nIted STATES and British Governments re.
spect'ng the imprisonment of Messrs. Warren
and Costello on the alleged grouni OF their
completely with the Fenian Brotherhood, was
supplemented this morning by the publication
of additional des pl'chss ahch raise the larger
question relating to the Laws OF NATURALIZATION.
From communication addressed Oy Lord
Stanley to MIR. Thornton on the 18th June 1t APP
pears that, aciing upon Instructions received
from Mr.. Seward, the United States Cnar5e
d'Affaires in this country formally in
qulred of our Foreign Munster whether her
MajestVs Government was prepared at once to
enter into q treaty with the United States Gu the
subject OF naturaliza ION. Lord Stanley's reply
was to the same effect as the statement recently
-
That the British Government would willingly
entertain in priuciple the question of the Nstu-
ralizatlon Treaty, aud no longer hold to the
doctrine of lude easole allegiance; but he added
tlat with eI cry disposition to contribute to the
setting at rest of question Calculated to inter-
tere with the good understanding existing be-
tween the two countries, IL was ineXprdient, not
to say impossible, to proceed hastily with a
mat er involving, as this does, so many impor-
tant legal and other questions. 1t seemed
to the Foreign Secretary IneVi able that legisla-
ton on the subject must be deferred till the
meeting of the new Parliament, and
as the treaty must be made dependent on such
legislation it Was useless 10 conclude it at once.
The next communication Is the lie ter addressed
by Mr. Seward to Mr.. Moran In reference to the
imprisonment Of Messrs. Warren and Costello,
in which the former speaks Of tue 'judici+l
severity maintained by the British Government"
which, he says has tended to embarrass the
friendly relations between the two counties. and
10 protract the political egcitement in the Bril-
tish provinces. Enclosed IN this despatch was
The resolution of the House OF Represent at,ves,
requesting the President TO take measures for
ebecting the release of the prisoners, and such
other measures las will secure their return to
our flag, with such ceremonies are appro-
pirate TO the occasion." A reply to these COM
munications was sent from the Foreign Office
through Mr. Thornton on the 18th ult. Upon The
general question OF naturallza ion, Lord Stanley
had nothing to add to the sta ement he had
already submitted to MIR. Morau. As regards
the demand for the release OF Warren and
Costello, 1t is ba- ed on grounds which manifest
a total msconcepuou of The facts of the case.
They were not imprisoned simoly for words
spoken and acts done in the United States
(athough evidence gwen on those points was
strictly in accordance with the rules OF law),
but we're convicted of having cone over to
Ireland, and crused along the coast with intent
to effect a landing of men aud arms in that part
OF the British domlnions, in order TO raise an
insuIrection against the QnseD. Whether the
explanations given by Lord Stanley are or are
not satisfactory TO the United States Govern
mt MT is a secret which may possibly be dlvuleed
by the publication of the next batch of CORE
SDOndpncp.