The Weekly Perrysburg journal. [volume] (Perrysburg, O. [Ohio]) 1861-1???, 1868-03-06
TIE STUPID SENTINEL.

We perceive our friend of the Sentinel
IN his last issue, has reelected the senti'
inlnis ut his perryslurg tator. The aru.
,le ia beautifully dpnp, the figures arc very
expressive. and the attempt TO exhibit him
self as martyr, on the couity.scat qucs
,ion is very touching. With lido more
,,ractioe our umiable friend will become an
expert in Billngsgato lingo, and his rcally
brilliant abilities in that limo, will soon fit
lin TO become wholesale doaler in adi.
fsa. In procuring eupplyof that mate.
ui, he will lind roady assistance from his
l"rrysburg associates in that liuo OF trade
,f which tho article ho vendod last week il
rioh sample. lie closes hs TRADE Of
liuncafnbo with the following contempt.
! 10 piece Of brasgsioc o aud II nleI: As
! ,pg as The leading editor Of that paper
tao JouBS,r has not the manhood to re.
,dy TO Us publicly, We wish him to cease cir.
,ulalirg pricdielN tho iasehoods no has
heretofore seen fit to apply to u.s. In ro
gard TO the latter charge, we pronounco il
- be all unblushing aud infamous Islander
,nd the Sentinel man kupws it to bo the
itct, such man to talk Of maniucss when
Is knowingly gives uttcrance to a false &C.
,usauon. Why does he not state the
circumstances on which ho bases his allc.
paiions? HIS readers coull then Judge,
rrd we could rcIly TO them. In regard to
cur not replying to him publicly We are
rot aware OF any existiug controversy 10
curing us to euter the list with him. Per.
sInally ws .havo respected him, until fur.
J shed with tue specimen Of knlvery cou.
iAinod in his last paper. Politically he has
roCcsscd 10 brlong to the hcrmpyhyodde
,~icr. Whether his paper will hereafter
l,n MASCULINE or tomAniar, roDOinJ to be
: on. Until that is demoustr ,lcd, wo can
J Id no controversy with that gaiUs IN
tie Cbuuty ysoNt argument, he has held no
/. ,rt. That question was settled previous
G. his takins tho Saiitsi Hal that not
|. on the ctsc We shonll have hal no con
I ,versy with him, as we consider il such
thl people of Wood County must them
+ lVus determine. Had we been identified
With tho JOURNAL at the tlmo thc merits OF
,tnt question was discussed, we would not
lave taken grounds for, or against, either
lerrysburg or Bowling Green unl We Ger.
t,inly shall not be tempted To speak in IA
" of or against taxation TO erect county
lu,ldiugs, should that matter bc presentcd
I the people. r It We shall at all times in
r It that matters relLtin; to any special taN
ot magnitude, whether in favor OF Perry s.
burg or Bowling Green, shalt be referred
10 the people for their decision, We hav,
ocly expressed our views on this matter
20 many of our old friends at Bowint
tirsen, aud they will admit that the posi-
ton we have taken in the JuURNlL is eve
more moderate than in our conversation
with them. On this basis, therefore, W,
can have no grounds for reply to anything
the Sentinel may uttor. Ia tho matter o
o.'ly to il we arc in tho prcdcament Of
man who had charge OF very lean bawl
ing brat. who, when toll to spank it, re
llied,l /" have been looking for something
e. spank, but can't find any bottom" S
with the Sentinel; when We examine it ia
p'!itlcal, l2c15, or in an intellectual sci sc
Ne can fnL 10 bottom. 1t is 6oHomlcSs.