Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-10-13
THE C0URTS.

CHAECERY CoURT-FBa. 81. Smith,
ChddceHOT.-The decisions rendered by
the Chancellor were 50 follows:
Rosser VS. Ford, decree for complainant.
Keep VS. Cameron, demurrer overuled.
White VS. Wiekershsm, record sufficient.
The following DEGREES and orders were
entered!
SommervilIe vs. Dubose, guardian ad iitem ap.
pointed. III.
vandervIlle VS. Persons, motion for dover.
Cry vs. Moon, pro confesso,
FarrOw VS. Farrow, repo confirmed.
Eddtns VS. Dunn, sale renewed.
Anderson exSparte, reference, etc.
Schater vs. Chase, trial decree.
Tsyisr ct al VS. Burdst', moIoa to dissolve in
junction.
Tomeny vs. Eaton, motion to revoke decree.
RngseJ VS. Ounce, reference.
Walt vs. Leftw.ch, guardian ad Item.
Bradford Us tenton, s&'e order.
StIrK VS. C0ckreu, reference.
Terry VS. Brown, petition 10 be filed.
Wills VS. Beaumont. dismissal.
NCCully Of al VS. Wright, hnal decree.
Hllmsn VS. QutInby, reference.
West vs. same, References.
Spittle VS. Soittls, reference.
Graham vs. Edgington ct a. fual decree.
Malatests vs. Beaumont, motion 20 dismiss.
Cord ?na VS. Beaumont, motion todi-soIve in
junction.
Georgetta VS. same, motion to dissolve injunc-
ton.
The following eases have been set for
hearing to-day:
~ Holmes VS. Holmes.
I'D Pnelaa We McDavnt, admir-.
II Norris vs. James, adn'x.
rs WetmOre ct al. vs. Morton CT al.
I9 Mcneil st q, VS. Rsfrun.
l8J BIttdn vs. MOrton ct al,
iSl Brow vs. Boyer ct al.
49, American Elk press Bank VS. Andrews.
lS3 Davidson, admir-, vs. Davidson.
l34 DeLoach, admir-, VS. McHamaTa.
lgi Saint VS. Cook ct 81.
~ Rsiney ct al, VI Rainey eta,
l59 Planters Bank OF Tennessee VS. Merrill.
t4d Hicks VS. Early Ell al
l4l Leftwich ct al. vs. Buntyn ct al.
AZ Glenn VS. Petit.
I4j Morris vs. Jon et al.
1AS Hun Fs Peel Of al.
AS Mama VS. Doug,6s ct 81.
I49 Caldwell vs. Belts ct al.
$50 Kendall VS. Titus ct al.
l5l Cu5uowsth vs. Abbott ct al.
l2 GapEia ct al. VS. Olark OF al.
l54 sls5p 81 al, VS. Mcdowell.
l55 While Of al. VS. Eettis OF al.
10 fames, use, etc VS. Bettis et al.
l54 krtisnd e. al vs. Ferguson ct al.
~ Gu VS. Mcknight.
40 Hswett ct al vs. I Joney ct al.
l5l hall ct al VS. Gale ct al
los Drew vs. GWynn ct al,
lBi Lane & 20 vs. @iJneaSpOOH ct ri.
IG5 Ross Us toss ct al.
l67 carey VS. Mcmahon ct al.
is Parham We Mcneil.
leg Baker VS. watkins ct al.
40 Harris, admir- vs. Moore ct al.
III BAH. adrl'x vs. Dunu ct al.
liz BE Sn x Co vs. Pope ct al.
lES Arnold ct al vs. same.
Ia HorStmau 4 Sen VS. Same.
10 CbsdalI ct al VS. Same.
l76 Stewart s Co Va Same.
Ia Hercng ct al VS. same.
Us ans 4 Co VS. Same,
I79 Murdoch & Co VsSame.
$50 huckner VS. Robinson ct al.
ISL Violet y Co vs. Bryson.
lS2 walker et al vs. GEirin ct al.
Court meets to-day alto o'clock an.
CRIMINAL CoURT.-Wa Hunter Judge.
The October Term net and adjourned on
yesterday, over to Monday next. The |
Grand Jury will be empsnneled IN that
day.
MUNICIPAL CoURT-G Geo. w. Waldran
cases set for trial TO day are
az follows.
70 a The state VS. s:agle. gaming.
GA TO 63S vs. Beer, keeping gaming
$50 to 500 State VS. sehooles. gaming.
TO l069 " Church, .aminV.
" TO LIS " Brpwh, unlawful service of
criminal process.
ulsstate VS. M~cDanousa, carrying dan
gerouS weapons. 4
to ll2s state VS. kfrwan, hrlhing votes.
ll0 Chapel, accepting bride.
1881 to Ilaa " e Kirwsn, bribing voters.
lll to liz Iis5 q q FEs sngiss S SofSSS on vo,a
certificate. IL
li5' STATE vs. League, specializing In eeun-
ty warrants
llQ state VS. A1kes.
1875 a Henderson, larceny
1853 Moran, oertiorari, etc.
t. 1874 " MeOullock, gaming.
1895 /" " Jonnsoo. baItery.
1905 &" Z" DeSoto, gaming.
1861 " Quinn, gaming.
Court meets to-day at 8 O'Clock, q. m.
SHELBY CIRCUIT CoURT-Ge0roe ".
Jndge.-Qn yesterday a dismis-
iRl was entered In the Caseof the State VS..
and Anderson fnegroesl, in-,
.iictnnent for murder CT q negro. on Big
Creek. The defendants were found
yuilty last term, and on appeal TO the
Court the verdict wss set aside
Ind q new trial granted. The witnesses
not be found, 50 q mol. pros. was
Forieitures wera taksn against q num-
'er OF witnesses for non.attendance.
To-day the cases Of the State VS.. Hud-
lsll, Indictment for murder, and the
state vs.. Lannahan, indictment for MUIR
Ter, will be called for trial.
LAW CouRr-H s. Lee, Judge.-The
term commenced on yesterday.
\ full jury was not obtained on Yester- /
Jay. To-day the empRnneling OF the
anne will be concluded. No other bust
to be transacted. erf4-r
SUITS IN q. s. CoURTs.-Attorneys
md others interested would do well to
ear in mind they have but little overa
week in which to bring suits to the next
erm Of the United States Circuit court, 4
d which court the writ with copy of
must be served st least thirty
lays before b commencement Boe the
for the case to stand for trial at
hat term. The next term will be held
~ fha fourth Mandav In Nouamho.