New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-03-30
In the Snrrogate's Court the following wills

have been proved: n.-,,u c..,.
Isa G SaaIS. s:@s. L F Johnston. 3ss fs
Mana S'1s T Tsg aS E5s5 L. Hem,u FrHI BTcon
Letters of administration were granted to- ~
T MIN R5 Bfy.n Pi 3s s as RaS his9'
Hssssr gsis,tp, Hesi.i Valentine, Msiy C.r ,
Vim J. Williams James Keuny Augustus u Mansfield
wym.n Bach Margaret. Appe, Seph s9 HIS IT,.
EiIabeth Br.nai
Guardians were appointed as follows: III. v...,.,
Of Abraham NoTggr Bridget Carney o. wT '9a James Mse
Sasn ~ SSIo ~ on ~ SnsI "a MJ wan. Msry l. Whit Of
Harriet L. Mark W. White John Keller Of Charlotte and HaT
rici L. Keller
In the U. s. District Court on Saturday the
following cases OF involuntary bankruptcy were
adjourned 10 next Saturday National City Bank OF New
Hubbeii First National Bank OF wesport aR Robert L.
Taylor; Jehel Parmoy agt. The Miles Manufacturing
Company; James NJ. Demarest agt Packer ct al same
agt Packer; same agt. Phenx Park Coal Company;
Couillard agt. New-Iork Mail Steamship Company;
Charles A. Denny ct al agt. Wickes ct al Merchants
Mutual Insurance Company Of Baltimore agt New-YOrk
Mail Steamship Company James Low ct al agt George
A. Wicks ct al The defendants in the following cases
sdiudcated bankrupts Morris Bendix agt Caroline
NJ. Reichman, &c; Lawrence Drumgold agt Daniel W.
ed by the PARTIES Nathan
Alfred Smith, jr., George A. De LOynes. Walter Haw-
Renbea smith Alfred Fiostroy. William Burnet George
W. White. William II. Kniffer Robert d. Hamn, Morris
Pearl Of POughkeepse Duchess Co.. n VI and Robert
II. Strong Of Newburgh Orange Co. n. Y.
In the United States Supreme Court the
case OF The United States agt Henry 8 and John = Gil
lett came up appeal from the Supreme Court OF the
Territory OF New Mexico This Is another case from New
Mexico under the COnscaton act OF july 1902 and UNI
der the act of March, 1863 extending the jurisdiction OF
the District Court OF FL Paso and other
districts Of Texas The property seized in this
sisted OF real estate the County FL Paso belonging 10
the Giletts The seizure made by the United States
Marshal The District Court assumed Jurisdiction Of the
cause and condemned the property forfeited to the
United States and ordered 10 he sold, one half OF the
proceeds after deduction OF all costs and expenses 10
to the Marshal. informant. Appeal was taken from
that decree the Supreme Court OF the Territory where
il was held that the District Court had no jurisdiction
under the act Of March, 1862 over real
estate In the County OF FL Paso, Texas.
The decree below reversed and this appeal taken
to review that reversal The point being taken as
in case recently reported that the act OF March, 1855
did extend the Jurisdiction Of the District Court over the
subject matter OF the situated in FL Paso The re-
spOndents deny Jurisdiction and urge that the District
Court did not IN Court OF Admiralty nave
jurisdiction in proceedings pursuant 10 capture on land
In such il IL asserted the Court sits az court OF
common Law, and that in all at common law, the
trial must be by jury The trial il conducted In the same
manner and is subject to the incidents rs an ord-
! nary personal action
The act of Congress under which the proceeding Is In
sttuted provides expressly that the proceeds In suc
cases shall be paid into the Treasury OF tho United
States" There is provision In the act whaeSssI
authorizing the payment any portion OF the procce
supreme Court decree Of the District Court Shouo
7 he INST