Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1868-05-13

county to procure additional lands for the
use of the Longview Asylum, was read the
third time.
The question being on the passage of the
Dill, the yeas aud nays were called thereon,
and resulted-yeas 81, nays 10. So the bill
passed.
H. B. No. 257, Mr.. woLF-To amend
section two (2 of an act entitled an act to
amend sections l and of an act entitled
can act for the protection of certain birds
and game. passed April Sd, 1867, (volume
"a. page 10l-2) was read the third time.
Mr..WOLF explained the changes made
IN the old law, by the present bill, to be,
that the exhibition of game for sale during
the time the killing of the same is prohib-
their i'll .gal killing.
Mr.. HILL, of Erie, further advocated the
passage OF the bill, and gave an interesting
history OF the nature and habits of wild
geese and other birds, and at bis instance
wild geese were stricken from the bill and
not included within its prohibitions.
The yeas and nays were called ON the pas-
sage of the bill, and resulted-yeas IS. nays
Is. So the bill passed..
III. B. No. 255, Mr.. BORDEN-Supple.
mentary to an act entitled ian act to pro.
vide for the uniform government and bet
ter regulation of the Lunatic Asylums ir
the State, and care of idiots and insane
passed April q, 1856 (Swan 6 Critchfield
page S4S), and amended April IL, 1S6;
(Ohio Laws, volume 60, page 76), was read
the third time.
Mr.. BORDEN explained the bill. There
were wives whose husbands were in the
Insane Asylum. The bill authorized the
disposal, by sale. of certain properly, helt
by the wife in her own right, without the
cost of going into the courts.
Nr.POND further advocated the bill, ant
EuOmlCte0 that Slch q Ia nf
necessary. $40
The yeas and nays were called on tn,
passage OF the bill, and resulted yeas SO
nays IL. SO the bill passed.
ii. b. No. $50, Mr.. BELVILLE-Tt
amend sections one and two of an act en-
Titled ian act regulating the hours of man
nal labor" passed March 10, 1852 (Voiumi
80. Ohio Laws; Swan & Critchfield, 1S7 ant
S24), was read the third time.
Mr.. WOLF would not support law tina
was calculated to array one class of com
mun1ty against another and create pre-
JUDGE between the employer and the EN-
ploye. He regarded all attempts to fix tn,
NUMBER OF hours for labor as preposterous
1or the demand would always regulat
time and wages.
Mr.. BELLVILLE defended the bill an,
said he had introduced it in obedience T.
the demand of large number OF people
who desired that capital should not be al
lowed to oppress them by affixing bot
wages and the time OF labor. Experienc
had shown that in factories children coul
not work longer than eight hours withou
material injury to their health. He hope
the bill would pass.
MIR. LEE was opposed to the bill. II
thought if parties desired to work owe
eight hours per day, they ought to be per
mltted to do so. Their necessities Nigh
absolutely require them to work longer
fhnr1nhf fhnxy 80 ~ -.
make contract for a greater period,
deemed by them necessary and proper.
Further observations on the bill wer
made by Messrs. Scott, of Hamilton. Scott
of Warren and Lee.
Mr.. ACKER moved to postpone the bill
and pending amendments to the secon
Tuesday OF January, 1869. The Hous
agreed.
H. B. No. 4O1, by Mr.. ROSS, supplement
ary to the act entitled an act to authoriz
the Board of Public Works to grant tn
right of way to the Friend street, Columbus
Railroad Company, passed May 9, 1855
was read the third time and passed-yea
65. nays 6.
Fl. B. No. 1893, by Mr.. HORD-To author
ize The council of the incorporated villag
of Marion TO issue bonds and borrow mon
ey to improve the streets of said village
was read the third time, and the question
being on its passage, the yeas and nay
were called, and resulted, yeas 81, nays Il
So the bill passed.
S. B. No. 247.- Supplemental to an act t.
authorize the commissioners of Fairfiel,
county, Ohio, to improve road therein
named, was read the third time.
Mr.. HUGHES, of Butler, explained tn
bill and desired it to pass. The yeas ant
nays were called on the passage of the bill
and resulted-yeas SO, nays 5. So the bill
passed.
H. B. No. 400, by Mr.. HUGHES, o
Highland-Tor repeal an act supplemental,
to an act relating to roads and highways
the supplementary act to be repealed pass
ed April 8, 1867, (vol. Ga, page III of tn
Laws of Ohio), was read the third time.
Messrs. Hughes, of Butler, and Hughes
of Highland, explained the bill.
The question being on its passage, tn
yeas and nays were called thereon, and re
sulted-yeas 81. nays /. So the bill passed
On motion of Mr.. RUTTER, the Hous
took a recess.