The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1868-05-18
q the SOVEREIGN who has him into false and

uncons,autonal position. -
Saee the preceding portion Of this letter was
Commons last evening has come to hand. The de-
bate was too long to be quoted in full and the liberal
tiresome iteration. But the follow ingspeecl Of Mr..
Ayrton Is lair summary OF the liberal statements,
nentary language. sI faSer coro Sod Of the
facts which have narrated in regard 70 the queens
interference with the questions before the House,
Mr. Ayrton, having listened TO the right honoIaple
gentleman lDsraeli) yesterday failed to underslana
the exact situation OF AFFAIRS which, therefore, might
not ne 80 well understood by other h0norapie ineLn
bers and throughout the country as 1t ought to be-
He had been enlightened ~ the statemen. aue III
another place and he had listened 70 he e e%
now more confused than he Was before any explana-
ton was gwen He was inclined 10 thnH sd,s artse
House, not a statement Of Ulat took place 0et.oeen
himself ana his sovereign, but short summary Of
ssssreon aea adhere t. BECAUSE the right
accoant the between his sovereign
himself but he gave only the effect OF 1t; aud the
ns Saa described 70 the House,
ing to give short version OF what must have taken
place he might have done justice to HIMSELF but 1t
was not clear he had done full justice to his sOve
reign Uerv painful impression acO,ld be created
especially In Ireland, achen the ttU nature or the
r0ht honorable 0entieman's statement OF me resH.
ofnts communication ,cfh his sovereign scas unfe1-
stood. For what was that results Did he tell his
sovereign that great majority Of the House OF Com;
upon policywlth the object OF satisfying the people
OF ireland, and that 1t was necessary In the opinion
should be Immediately carried into efrects Did he
tell his sovereign that he was determined to resist
anS nnnencs Of the @ for the pure
pose OF setting at defiance the deliberate purpose Of
the House Of Commonsi clear, hear.) Did he ask
that purpose hts sovereign said ne should not resign
but should continue to administer pubtfc dtdtrS
The House must know something more Of the cir
cum9tauCes uuQer
man said he rendered his resignation, which his
sovereign refused to accept Did the right honorable
gentleman advise his sovereign to accept his resig
nation? Hear hear.) This practice OF rendering o
resignation was unintelligibe unless 1t was accom-
panied by the most solemn advice to the sovereign
to accept 1t, and unless all the arguments Were
used which were necessary to induce the sovereign
one ac Se" coa %s ., he 's o wess od nS
tat the sovereign acas keeping him IN Office Jor the
purpose OF resisting the deliberate Judgment or TIE
explain the whole interview, and not the effect OF
1t, when that effect was 10 give character to q
ministry at the expense Of the sovereign. Then, In
further communication with the sovereign, Ian
guage was used OF most eqrivocal character
This was when suggestion was made that Parlia-
ment should be dissolved as soon as the state OF
pubic business would admit In the ordinary sense
OF those words they meant that Parliament would be
dissolved within fortnight. II such language
were addressed TO any honorable member con,ersant
with public AFFAIRS and he were told that Parlia-
ment was to be dissolved as soon as the state OF
understand that there would be dissolution within
fortnight. Was that the sense in which this recon-
mendation was made to her Majesty, or had II some
different meaning II So 1t was an ambiguous piece
OF advice. (iear hear) On the whole, the House had
between the First Minister Of the Crown and his SOW.
ereign; and the name OF the sovereign appeared to
hare been used t0acards the House In a manner
iChch aCdS DhOily uJuStUtdbe. (Cheers.) The right
honorable gentleman called upon the majority of this
House to abdcate the functions which they were
bound TO discharge and for the sole purpose OF keep
ing tine present government in ONCE. Such propo-
stion was outrage to the House, and Its only OBJ
ect was to crafty the ambition Of the First Minister
OF the Crown. (hear, hear.)
During the same debate Mr. Bernal Osborne, who
Is frank and outspOken to fault, almost revealed
the current political scandal ana quite revealed the
spirit with which the Queens interference has been
received in the following remarkable declarations=
the personal claims OF ministers urged reason for
the forbearance OF the House, and, curiOusy enough
those personal claims have been put before the peace
first time at least IN this centdTy the authority Qfthe
C'Ocn has been made use 0Cdls0st as Sv1lpdthtzing
hear.) Nay more the name OF the sovereign has been
jon tie FIRST time ItoOuld almost say 6esmfrched IN
ne arena Or political conflict Cheers and cries Of
''OhrD Now say that this Is q most unhappy
state OF things, not only FOR the Groom ITSELF but for
the House OF Commons and the other House OF Par
lament. 1t would almost seem to me- listening to
the enunciations made In another place, not by q
noble duke, but man who uses the purest English
which, not content aeitn being tle presiding genfus
privileges OF this House. (Renewed cheers.)
Observe the loud cheers Of the opposition and the
phrases which they cheered, and you will see that
the liberal party IL not TO be turned from its chosen
policy even by the Queen and that her Majesty Is
likely to lose herself In attempting to save the Irish
Church.
Charles Dickens Return-ss American Notes''
in 1S6S--The New York Dinner and BOhe-
Observation-Disclosures An Enthusiastically Re.
appearance-Other Celebrities-rhe Actual
LONDON, May 9, 1865.
The HERALD has been severely attacked and con-
demned by many Of its contemporaries for the view
which 1t thought 1T to take OF the visit and the pro-
ceedings Of Mr. Charles Dickens In the United States
II the HERALD's view required either justification
defence both may be found in the following article
from the Pal Mau Gazette which represents the SEN
tments of all intelligent and sensible Engshmen in
regard to the matter. On the day following Mr..
Dickens return to London the Pau Man said
As Mr.. Dickens himself on the one side and the
Americans on the other are In q state OF mutual
ecstasy which appears TO have risen almost to the
boiling pitch, IL would be ungracous to interfere
IN the scene reported In Yesterdays papers the New
York Bohemian dinnerl on which IL II natural 10
make an observation or two In the first place, Mr..
bily abnormally keen appear to Us TO have put him
on the occasion I'm question in rather absurd posi-.
ton. II is about quarter OF century since his
american Notesn and MARTIN Chuzzlewitr threw
some part OF the thin-sknned population which they
rldculed into paroxysms OF Indignation. When
he spoke the other day at New York he praised the
whole nation with an indscrimnate ardor which ex-
cited rapturous delight. Everything even Mr.. Dick
ems himself 10 q certain extenu had changed. al
have been received" he said, In small places well
IA large, "with indispensable politeness, decacy,
sweet temper, hospitality, consideration, apd with
indispensable respect for the privacy daily enforced
upon by the nature OF my avocation here and the
state Of my health This testimony, as long a. live,
and as long my descendants have any legal right
In my books shall cause TO be published as an ap-
whchl have referred to America. And this will do,
and cause TO be done, not In mere love and thank
fulness, but because regard 10 as an act OF plain
justice and honor.r Az for the relations between
America and England, OF which Mr. Dickens felt him.
according TO Mr.. Dickens, In some respects were
almost loverlike war between the two nations