The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1868-01-31

THE B II in this case alleges that one
Patrick McC u ifI, late of Hartford
county. died abou the 20,h day of Janu.
arv, 1866, intestate, and seized of lot Of
land in Havre de Grace in said county,
being the southern hall of lot designa-
led on the plat Of the town Of Havre de
Grace as Lot No. $50, in square No. $50;
that letters of administration have been
granted by the Orphans Court Of Har.
ford county, onlhe personal estate of said
interstate, to Henry D. arnandis, bul that
the personal estate is. Insufficient to pay
the deb of the, interstate, and that his
hei sat law are unknown. a
TIL. { The inleslate was indebted to com
p'ainanL and to otter persons, at the time
of his death, and the Bill prays for sale
If the said Lands to pay debts, SIC, and
f"r notice by publication against the UNI
known heirs-at-law. ....... $50,
Whereupon tits ordered this 18th day
ofJanuary, 1868, that the complainant, by
publication of a cops Of this order in
some newspaper printed in Hartford coun-
weeks, three months before the 10Th
day of NAV, 1858, give notice to the
heirs at law OF Patrick McCauliE, OF the
substance. and object Of said Bill, and
warn them To appear.ia, this Court, on or
before the 18th davSof May, 1868, to
show cause. if any they have, why de-
cree should-not pass as prayed, and that
in default Of such appearance, the allega
tons of the bill may be taken as confess
ed against them E9 e--
A. LINGAN JARRETT,
Z Clerk.
True copy, Test. ~ ~ p
rs A. LiNGAN JARERTT,
ian24 Clerk.
WILLIAM ANDERSON In the Cireuit Court
vs.. for Hartford county, in
''''Aa aas : e,b ass'H'o'' 0A'"'s'y.
T'HE Bill filed in this case states that
i William Anderson, late Of Baltimore
county, deceased, died seized in fee of
tract # land, situated in Hartford c.unty,
called sBarnett's United Fields,o con-
tanning one hundred and sixteen acres,
more or less, which is described in
deed from William BON and wi e to said
deceased, duly execulsd and recorded
That said deceased, by his last will, di-
rected said land to be sold alter the deaf.
o. Elizabeth Tracy, who then occupied
the same, but is since dead, the proceeds
to be divided among his heirs-at-law, and
appointed said Benjamin T., Anderson his
executor, WIN has neglected and refuses
to sell said land. That comp ainant and
the other children of said testator and the
children oil his deceaeed son Joshua, who
are named in said bill, are his only heirs
at-law.
The Bill further states that Mary j.
Meads, Caroline Lutho, Vim. Renshaw,
John Renshaw. Jas. Renshaw, Mary
Hale, Sarah j, Rigdon and others claim to
have some interest in said land. which
complainant denies, and AYERS that il will
he FIR the interest of all the parties emit
tied to have said lands sold and the pro-
ceeds divided under a decree Of said
Court, and prays for decree for sale
of said land and partition OF the proceeds.
And it appearing that two subpenas
against the said defendants, Mary j.
Meads, Caroline Lntho, WIN Renshaw,
j o h n Renshaw, me Renshaw,
Mary H al / and Sarah j.. Rigdon
have been returned non est. 1t is order
ed this 29til day of November, 1862, that
the complainant, by publication Of this
order in some newspaper printed and
published in Hartford county, once in each
of four successive weeks, three months
before the 10th day Of May next, give no.
tice to the said defendants of the sub
stance aud object of said Bill, and warn
them to appear in this Court, in person or
by attorney, on or before the said 10th
day Of May next, to show cause, if any
they have, why decree should not be
passed as prayed, otherwise the allegations
Of the Bill may be taken pro confesso
against them. =
A. w. BATEMAN.
Z. True copy, Test, Is.
ID. A. LlNGAN JARRETT, Clerk.
janl7 ~, ~,
IS THE POPULAR EDITION OF DICKENS.