Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-10-17

CHANcERY COURT Vim. II Smith.
Chancellor, etc.-Iue DEGREES and orders
entered on yesterday are as follows;
WiIe VS. Boon, leave to answer.
Somervilie VS. DUbJse, reference.
Butler VS. Johnson, order On Sheriff
bTowh VS. Day, guardian appointed.
ellison VS. kus' ., sale.
Wiikerson vs. f. ms. Co. referanea
Hamilton VS. Treat, sale elc.
Edmonds VS. Bates, final decree.
rage VS. commercial Bank OF Tennessee, in
structioas TO Receiver.
flnlay VS. Aeylin, consolidation.
Mosby vs. Hunt, reference.
Nrt vs. hunRingham, guardian appointed.
OrglLi VS. Baker sale confirmed.
Church VS. Trezevart, frnaL,
Bolton VS. Hsrrell, rnai. n
Quuniy VS. hothrock, pro c0nfesso.
NeWsOm VS. Taylor, pro oonfesso-
butler vs. Small, decree renewed.
30 ton VS. cash, pro cOnfesso.
anderson XsCcos, Receiver released.
Martin VS. Duh lnterlocutory order.
Robinson Us Williams, tale. etc.
Knapp vs. Southern Ekpress Company- iptarlo.
cutory order.
Greenlaw VS. Monroe, consent order.
Fargason VS. Hawi-y, guardian appointed.
Sl6IaJn VS. H1gniago, reference,
HARRISON vs. sale removed
CiTode vSAikens, reference.
Guile vs. Hayer, reference.
Corues rs Murphy, motion to dissolve.
smith vs. HICKS, guardian appointed.
6@lseI Ns Smlth, guardian appointed.
Paul VS. Smith, guardian appointed.
WlchershAm Us Callahan, oeder on tenants.
Cox VS. ketohum, dnal decree.
IrDy VS. Shef vel, order GA complainant
NILlett VS. Brown, administrator appointed.
Inc remaining orders and DEGREES will
oe published 70 morrow morning.
The cases set for trial on Monday next
are al fOliows-Court standing adj
iOurned ove to Monday
lei s.ockley VS. Trigz ct al.
l5 W&lKer VS. Trig e. 81.
30 Jones Us Spencer.
81 Chasntr VS. Merritt ct al.
Z5 Adams vs. Memphis and Little Rock Rail-
ro2d Company etsi.
274 1rigg et al vs. tTigg ct 81,
40 Howell vs. Williams.
Z6 WIcks vs. McDernOtt,
27 Porter VS. Street ct al.
Us Thompson VS. ScnmCck.
2y Morris ct al VS. Seldom < Co ct al
80 Hin et al VS. Davie e. 81.
Isl Halium, admir-, VS. Barnett ct al.
- sharpe G % VS. Hicks e. al.
2S3 Cope & 20 vs. Philips st I'll.
2Si Cope 4 Co vs. Thomas ct al
ZSj Gay oso Savings lust. VS. Connsu et al.
~ Parker vs. Parker ct al.
~ saHarans VS. hendrickson ct al.
2S CIiHJOn We Mcdonald.
2>9 Clinton vs. Mcdonald,
30 Ferguson VS. Wade e. al.
81 Madde1 VS. Stewart ct al.
292 SpecBeTnagle VS. Menifee ct al.
2S3 hosby OF al VS. Hunt ct al.
- smith VS. smith ct al.
s5 Rawlings vs. Horne ct al,
IS Raglan vs. May Ell ~.
~ Eoro, admit, VS. Clayton ct al.
~ nMiiSrd, sdmr, vs. Westbrook ct al.
GSd DOgu vs. GfaDt ct az.
30J BlumsntnGl VS. Horsuson.
81 Walker, admir-, VS. Pickett et al.
9o2 4 igg W Nelson, ex'trx.
eJ3 Bledsoe VS. Carpenter ct al.
30i CrofOrd OF al VS. SIaith CT al.
80 Spite VS. Spittle OF al.
Spivey vs. Smith.
3T Prizes vs. Parker.
S0o Trader VS. Goggin ct al
SHELLEY CIRCUIT COURT.-Ge0. ". |
Reeves, Jlsdge.-The Jury in the case OF
the State VS.. Hudnall, indictment for
murder, returned a verdict of not guilty, |
The case Of Davis VS.. Davis, divorce, |
on hearing yesterday, but not de-
Lermined. To-day the case of the State
vs.. LaJsshsn, indictment for murder will
DO cared up for trial.
LAW CoURT-H. s. Lee, Judge.-The |
Eases set for yesterday were disposed of.
being motion day, the motion
docket will bs taken up and called.
MUNICIPAL CoURT-Geo. ". Watdrdn,
following business was tans-
acted yesterday
The jury in the case of the State VS.
Cunningham, indicted for keeping 8
house, returned q verdict of
guilty and fixed the fine at $50 90. In
he cases Of the State VS. Wetherbee,
unlawful retailing, the jury returned a
OF not guilty.
The criminal side OF the Court stands
adjourned until Monday next.
To-day the law side Of the Court opens.
lie cases specially set for trial will be
,alled up and heard.