Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-07-15
THE COURTS.

y
CtdnceIlOr-The orders and DEGREES en-
tered on yesterday are as follows:
Warburg VS. B4umsn, interlocutory order.
Carroll VS. Carroll, final decree.
Provine VS. Stewart, new parties substituted.
Same vs. same, appeal.
Page VS. commercial Bank, instructions to re-
ceiver.
Meyers VS. Holland, reference.
Eddins VS. Mayor and Aldermen OF Memphis,
interlocutOry order
Petit VS. ooper, renew | Of order.
Slayer VS. Easland, amended return.
Ford VS. Hlnson, motion to dismiss Oyerruled.
Meath VS. Meath, reference.
Nix VS. Marshall "
Mari VS. Bank Of West Tennessee, leave to
amend.
Butler VS. Johnson, reference.
Hunt vs. Hunt, reference renewed.
White VS. Bolton, reference.
Mississippi Valley Insurance Co. VS. E,aIxin, mo-
ton to dismiss OveTruled.
Page VS. Commercial Bank, in1e iocut0ry order.
keerl VS. Donald, decree vesiing title.
Eddins VS. Mayor and Aldermen OF Memphis,
at -achment process.
Stewart VS. kOthran, final decree,
w ieks VS. Leftwich, de rec set aside.
Stanton. ex parte, appeal
Biziey VS. Meyers, injunction dissolved, etc.
10 the matter of petition of Milton
A. Kerr ct al. VS.. Dorcas s. Kerr, heard
yesterday before the Clerk and Master, a
jury was summoned under a writ de
yaslaatieo irsquiUe11do, the jury returned
the following verdict: We the Jury
fiud Mrs. Doreas L. Kerr not an idiot, a
lunatic, nor Of unsound mind unusual to
woman of her age, but believe her in
competent, owing to physical disability,
to transact her business or take care of
herself.n
Court stands adjourned until Friday
next, July II, 1858.
The Clerk and Master will take an ac-
count to-day in the case of Pritchard VS..
Graves ct al.
LAW CoURT-JdHles 0. Pierce, Judge.
The cases set for trial to-day are Nos.
734, 735, 1856, 1877, 78s, 739, 74O Of yester-
days calendar, and the following cases :
74l, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, TAT, 74S, 749,
$50, ISL, 752, 1853, 754, 755, 1855, 758, 759,
$50, 76l, 765, 1855, 767, 76s, 769, 40.
MUNICIPAL COURT Geo. ". WoldrGn,
.Jasdge.-A large number Of appeal cases
were dismissed on yesterday. Gar
nishees answered and were discharged
The following cases have been set spe-
cially for trial to-day:
IO8 Hopkins VS. Dickinson.
l07 Blackwell w Burr q Co.
10 Chiffon VS. Worsham,
lab Whiteman ct al VS. Creighton.
1872 Barrett w w eber ct al.
1874 Nash VS. NICK carney.
zoe Meacham ct al VS. Topp.
20B Heese, Levy * Co VS. HarmStad.
22I Thorn pson VS. Q. bridge
249 Cotton VS. Southern Express Company.
$50 Taylor ct al vs Hartley ct al.
265 Thorn ton ct al vs. Kelly.
2gs Nichols VS. Alexander d Co.
8J7 Butler VS. Christian ct al.
81 Duffer VS. Cuibert
3ig Knight VS. Woltering.
ST Mcdowell VS. White at al.
$3.50 Gregg q 20 vs. Green.
S4l Fitzpatrick VS. Baumah ct al.
$40 FITZPATRICK VS. Hauman ct al.
$50 Mas or and AID of Memphis VS. Quinlen.
5S7 Mayor and Aid Of Memphis VS. Quinlan.
378 Hughes VS. Smith.
ST Hughes VS. smith.
g7S Hughes VS. Smith.
2g5 Marks VS. Combs, Jr. & Co.
422 Kelly VS. Wright
rs @ and Q o steamer Mary 8. Turner vs.
$40 Ayers ct al. vs. Cohen,
AL Downey ct al. VS. Jones.
AS Page ct al. VS. Hesse, Levy & Co.
4ls McLemore vs. Wameeixe ct al.
457 whalen VS. Carter
462 Ellis VIZ Cook.
AS Hubbard & Co. VS. McKiernan.
465 Williamson VS. Boltnger,
46s Jenkins VS. Motley
467 Hampton VS. McCon1bE.
400 Calhoun VS. Boxhorn.
Ali parties out on bonds Criminal side
of the Court will have to come up and
renew the same Immediately returnable
to the second term Of said Court, or for
FIXTURES will be taken against them and a
capias issued for their srrest.
CRIMINAL COURT - VIM. Yssnser.
.7Ldqe.-The case Of the State va. Thos.
Coyne, Indictment for murder, yss called
on yesterday, but owing to the Illness of
defendants counsel, Col. John Bullock,
it was continued over to to-day. The
case will be called up this morning.
No other business was transacted on
yesterday.