The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1868-12-28
Mr.. Mann-wss he Depressed in manner2

Mr.. Mann. thought that it was clearly evidence to
show that his manner not that Of one embarrassed
Mr.. Hagert-To show that the prisoner had large
amount Of stock on hand sa substantive fact to which
does not prove that he unembarrassed that he did
murder.
Judge Brewster said that the fact Of the prisoner
manner would not be- D'' '
Witness resomed-Thesc shingles were marked Geo.
Twitchell' Jr, Cooper street wharf Camden; don't
Gross examined-I don't know how many bundles
shingles ont Of lumber furnished him did not tell me
mbr e d o & 9 sSd s a hapg SSeu5 SESS
mortgage his place of $780, did tell me he
Tenth and nd Pine he left Tandng about S
years; he Went into business think about year ago.
Joseph Daniels ,sworn-I reside in Mantue, N. j. and
defendant about fifteen years his charaeter was good
Thursday before the MURDER his stock was then about
Cross.examinedsAm a foundryman; 1 estimate the
pumber Of shingles from the piles haye dealt In gm'
Ellen Doian, sworn-I lived with Mrs Hill; went
there to live last May year, and left her last July
her but with that exception lived with her All that
@ Mrs m Hin 6d a6S Mrs. fV d the
work they used to sit in the dining room over the kit
a time TO their room between and o'clock, and no
and Mrs Twitche had gone to bed, would bring the
2nd ret read the news % to @ m went TO- bed at
9fer went TO bed; Mrs Hill generally attended the
but ii my door was closed in the winter, did hear
it in summer heard IL because my doors and windows
after went to bed; she carried candle and can
seen see RST With candle in the yard after wsVe
at night the bathro was in the back part of the
a bath between eleven and twelve clock at night;
t SH W6 iGa to 9F to Ry Mr.
Mrs TwitChel had gone to bed and before did have
generally received them in the dining room she trans
s %as heT noticed n that M m aha
Mrs. Twtchell were friendly, as far as know s.,
tuFg asked the witness was objected To- the Court
said that h % must first sI be askd sk hSw she she
MIR. Mann argued that the best manner of showing
shS ow ts T m Ssp h
room was her dapghter,s and claimed this property
to give her decarations against herself and could fol-
RS RS "a Sp Of ~ @ mCT cRs hS property was
Judge Lud9wThen yOg have better evidence nee t h@n
Mr. Mann-We have other evidence but it appears to
Judge BrewseT2i do not recollect any thing in the
eommonwealths case about the furniture in the house,
though there something said about title to real
NJ, Mann then claimed that this evidence would
all secured they could gain nothing by the murder OF
The court requesting the offer to be put in wIitngit
was done as we S1 9G m f n PTGyS I IN cent
the piano, willingly and freely to her daughter MIS-
Mr. Magert objected to the offer and, addressing the
Court called its attention to the fact that MI Mann
in arguing single question of evidence, wandered all
through the case and mantaiqed that the G9nrt had
refused to let the commonwealth give Mrs Hill de-
claratons to show motive and should not allow the
defence to give them to prove tnSt a W We i've
cned o admit any evidence &c you rogf may T
HSTg HSHT oer %ier we reserve % our decision
Mr.. Mann then offered to give II eXldehGe Dlis ior
fne Rs in fHaPltUFs a to ssssi IS &C. g. name Oi f'
Mr. Hagert suggested that they should be properly
Judge Brewster fcourse, gentlemen, you must con.
meet them with the furniture in question: and prove
their genuineness. , r. a., -, -
To save time f9as matter es tHep Was e anu ne"
mSSifT Wness S Sometimes had three dogs and
hse dGg and he wd Rt m Mrs.
fK sTG tRe shap dog rwlsGfe into FS
don't know the breed the black dog would commence
then take the dogs % ts their ST 6t ty 30 of @ R@
Mrs Hin kept them as pet dogs; went out Sunday
mornings but never went out in the even
every week, but only went once in a month or six
To IS Un
let in PIT they @S4ay IN Tege m
near YcTE only make my home there it is Mrs Gil
four %ssi nsR eW
Walnut street, after left Mrs Hill and lived there
there o4ST @ sery&H Sr in t9s Cg
spring sM4S TSs Know S Who lived during
work, washing the front, and washing and ironing;
St II % hs m usual fe hb S S to
ten O'Clock; slept in the third story back building
would % leave her sometimes at the dining room door and
| sometimes in the kitchen when went to bed; knew
ing the light she would be walking and looking at the
trees and rose bushes many times she did 50 tel
have got up and looked ont at her and seen herr had
sS sn9 6 T see 4 & t. ooad Sf n0 f e
can see tie light Of candle in the yard up in the third
back ba @ Ts M to SHf the 'T n do
after went bed because she told e me gO she t29
during the sumer; don I know whether she would theT
at twelve clock she would be in the dress wher
left herr the bath room was oyer my room; Mrs Hill
bath ROOM don know that she would dress herself be
fore her bath to walk in the yard have seen tenants
their name, but don't remember; Mr and Mrs Mrs
supper unless he read the paper; he came home tt
dinner on week days, but seldom on Sundays; believe
there was no fire there last winter; when i war
in the room it was daytime and was never there a.
there Mrs Hill had the care of her two dogs herself
they used to follow the house and were gene
with into their after tea don't know where
Mrs Hill dogs slept they Went 70 6eq VIII hSr IheI
it, up stairs in the dining until she went TO bed
with m her @ When she came to sit with me they Would NO
there bTt would o up about % the sofa in the
ner during the time lived there he away two oI
three days from dinner but home to supper don
Re"examined-Did Mrs Hill give you the reason why
she did not to bed until 80 late when you plagued
about walking in the yard at twelve o'clock at night
Objected to on the ground that Mrs. Hills declara
| Mr. Mann-We desire to prove that this habit hat
boen acquired through Mrs Hill having sat up late al
night during her husbands illness and that she coulc
not sleep before that time, and walked about in this
| manner to pass away her time, a., ,.-.
The objection sustained, and the witness being
withdrawn, the Court adjourned until to-day
SPECIAL NOTICES.