The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1868-10-07

article I. 'ec.Sn Sfucors were called upon, vhsr. a
S6SsnSs should SoloIS"ss Ss made sScoS %
ESsr Y Sn Ca % is sSs;sls @ M 1S.ss
i.,ed 70 be oe o1a Number Of such forged cersi
oa. Sss cs h 'Ssa SS
pf 5ssnSsd Il: % Ss M o
should not be shus ouIsss for Il this Insult not
oas
fortas Ssse ~ saying that ne c upsa very 9ncom
apy censu5es upon thls Court or an,
. Ss n. ooSnsc %Hs,i " S
@ hes snsloss n PssSq % m :. the Com was
sood ns mere yeGy eG Court @ was close and and be
nS me which .Sfs sSa. 'Ss aSSss @
was now looked upon ss mere tnns g be- Be dons s' oS
and had isen in9o dssspsa Eess rs
with false and fraudneSt TP9a ,se public 6ishMy
wis ps'sSs sv No matter ngcn whom foaa t1e way in
,Ssne The SIGNATURES upon these papers m1ESs be
the pspeSs shs%seSssr TSar' .Ts %ghs be
ard wss q. o upon the person OF rnnx
n',PO he conduct OF the a,rs OF he Pros65soaSrys
ter 70 ,eeoTe he stamp OF the seal Of Iss cens nson
ihnss 1 ~ irsnauent papers IL MS duty sbova ali
W%d p5oyes nSs @ 20 gusraes Bat yet he
Colonel snowdep He not believe asa iesse %
POSES 20 Which ,be ses Sss sught OF the Illegal par
me oher side no wever ld ted ms or
anu
blank 70 receive The stamp and sgnaiu ~ or
being hlled in This he denied. The nor sofie ofsioie
Sy Sy .nAt .ne Frolnonotary OF the Court mad TO mar
IYrm vas as The Gust dian OF the seal of this Sos,rt
shoad that 20 with Sps OF the his ma asGds Ne
tn sny en sne sanction OF the Court was Given
peared 10 MIN that IL the part OF The Proihp np
in office But shs %ss no. a ths .p pers1ps
case was conducted on the other side In an ihasns
narrow manner But from the witnes ,ez f.t a,d
NY IN tne case II appeared that least ssvenIvtE
OF theee blanE certificates already seeIad
loved loved 10 ie aronnd upon the oesks of ths yasion.
clerks In the Prothonotary's Office thera aI.ous
De stolen or In other ways to be improperly ana lila
He would call the particular attention of tho t,or.
TO the papers them yes vi AneOoutt
Masthls paper made by the policee The paper was
todyp These were substantial things and whos1s
answer for their pos ssou by common tirnknardS
Ihs o. was criticised. But look at these
rohonotay was its legal custodian and hs ,se sne
oouno TO Keep the strctest guard Don it t al b"s
kept In tne most conspicuous place Of a oroTSed
man VINO Dad never acled In that Office Store. it sd
not been locked up at night, and three difsrent n
sons hao Keys to the office Now stripping the pssa
OF a considerations OF criminal Intent what was fbe
resnlt OF tn ese circumstances? Why that ne bsd n
gIeaty Negligent In his duty. He was deputed
Dy law 10 use that seal himself, to speaE
the exercise OF that sacred duty 10 a oung ~
mao never before served under him. And mora NJ
hau appeATed al the young men employed there TOOK
Inc oeriy OF us1og that seal, and upon plank papers
Why the Prothonotary himself dare NOT adiI tbSt
sea- TO blank paper without the action of the onrt
Hbt ~; anu yet all these clerks had done il
He thought there had been sufficient sbown ,o
JUSTLY this investigation; for the peace OF the Protho
The msesty OF the law and for the good OF the public
1t large. " Puo'io
wood said he would give his decision on Saturday.
next - "~A~S