The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1868-09-21
LEGAL INT.ELLIG ENOE.

rSs r. ,ssooI e. PIIsTR1oT STR, SogaT,Jpags
& the
same jury being 10 attendance that served in July.
ss Sf
By Sss Se O. oa when
Dy me GoyeInmept officials, contained fraudulent
Sa
panSli9nI made however, was this;-Susted near the
s Of .ssp sG OCa a corn "a and other
pTCprittO q thIs applied sgent
Of seyen.yiye sacks Of corn from their
snG G@' Ss
ter road a. to LEND them Tine car was readily sent
eIy yard the oOSi@T asg as GUsSq %s. the cas ne
sss Hsssing ana sS 'Gs SsSund sss% "a
come in IL looked INTO IL aud discovered whisky
once set aside and sent ior the United States oolec
Iopaied in the fraud and had hsstened to give sne
the deie9dsnts msntsInea hat they should not Oear
the forfeiture Of the car The jury rendered verdict
,The Omitted States rs: 4 Furniture Gar and Pair OF
iOImsilon ior iorfeisure npon rToand tass the he
removal WHISKY IN OF he IN ses
the revenue law.
has resumed business. took the ground that there
was was no intent on the part Of me osmsnt
the removal and therefore he should not bejmade to
Tbs jury rsndsrsa 3 verdict for the claimant.
and Perce The September Term Of the Court
the SUBJECT or consideration.
NINTH WARD AssEssMHNT.
COURT OF QUARTER sEssIoNs-Allison, p. ].
show es maeT My Of s s ON 70
ode Of hs S to
Assessors OF the Ninth ward for the hodins
pi. or the exit extra assessment before reported. Mr.
sio1ers. admitting that the petlsiOn OF % ooln-
produced to me oOnf, an sfdsSit conaning the s fo
Loving ayerments.In due lime The Assessors OF the
the lists Of taxa6es their District at thai
ihe Commisso 'ers IN ConSeqIe1ce OF this fapnrs
actrg the decision OF this court as ven by his
so s
oS S @ S 'ns S
signed by these assessors. Messrs. Brown and Law.
Msrke that IN SS sSonS ,s9
The e. e. s sse III sss
had oeen given But further on the S0th of the same
Is
s 1m the noss v as st. he s gave It without
between the Assessors the Com M issioners thought
be GeRe tbs.
the Of Ss aOSs sSs the
IN ns snS no mo
note; and the testimony this latter person Was
that he signed the notice. not unwlllingy bat under
wait until within ten days before hold ng or the
assessment. at which time the law requires
them to give the notice, to see II then the
advance ofthe lime they stole march on the asses.
sors andsent out this notice The decision of Ju ige
Brewster referred to q good one bat IL did not
arpy TO this case & the circnmstances under which
IL was given were thab the assessors, to
time the Commissioners were required to have the
lists printed and the place made public were st i1
not have complied with the law unless they had
name d the place.
The Judge sustained MI Vancleve, adding that II
was the duty OF The commissioners, in they had
received no Communication from the assessors to
call npon Them 10 name a place, and then. in case
they failtd to do they to designate the place
He thought the Commissioners had not done their
whole duty In the matter, and. therefore, he would
grant the writ prayed for.
SECOND PERIOD.
The second period OF the present term began this
morning, and a panel of petit Jurors was in
attendance. A number OF applications for excuse
from nservice made but only those were gr ranted
that founded upOn legal grounds,