Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-10-22
THE COUNTS.

CHANCERV COURT na. 81. Smith,
Chancellor, etc.-rhs following oruefs
and DEGREES were entered yesterday;
Finley VS. Heytoo, making new party:
| Paterson rs Rogers, motion 70 dissolve inlunc-
Lanier vs. Merrill, final
sdanan VS. stIIIaaa, order on funds
Cope VS. Thomas, reference.
Cope vs. Pnitps- reference.
SpiEinE vs. Smith, reference.
\ GfeenlRV gs Monroe, motion to dissolve
omp VS. SmocE, in~terlocutOry.
Bradford VS. MeC0mb, order 70 speed.
Evans vs. Barrett, motion 70 Dissolve.
Alien VS. shanks, guardian al Item
Corey vs. Corey, ina.
Nc CROOKS VS. Brooks, new party.
cate VS.. Bateman, guardian sd Item.
Oasa Is Bond, pro Conlesso.
PICK vs. Dagis, reference.
Keep vs. C~snnOvsn, motion.
Toe cases set for hearing to-day, are:
1874 s;ockley vs. Trigg ct al.
Iss walker vs. SAME.
~ Porter Is street et Al.
- Gayoso savings Institution VS. Connen ct al
26 Parker We Parker - ~.
2S3 Nosby Ct a. rs HUutet al
~ Rawlings VS. Horne ct al.
10 Batter vs. Merrill
81 same VS. Crafrord et 81
5I2 Gresnlaw We Hopkins ct a.
8I8 Hunt VS. Heirs of. W Hunt
Sl4 Armstrong W Apperson.
So Prouu6t VS. Rogers.
KS Sheppard VS. sheppard.
SIS Poke VS. Armour.
/ So Earnes VS. CarDes,
SU Peck vs. Wad1eli.
s2i Chambers VS. foiEes, a
S35 PicSeJ vs. Carniaok.
So Gayloid vs. Street.
&c Gno<ksJ VS. Bsgby.
81 Gay lord VS. Jackson.
31s wexford VS. saBdsIson.
81 Kirk vs. Jones.
so James W. James.
70 Thompson VS. Gillespie.
8 Butter Us Ii e.
33S IIchran vs. Horton,
go Brs 1t vs. SLoneE
"a ,foom VS. Anderson.
al Rid W Hunter.
30 pa6h vs. Roberts
"a Hattie &c vs. H~srEedgs. -
-SA Harfiss " Har So
S45 Smitn vs. sS matt
SO Meath " STARK
S4T TOryan VS. hopb0n.
84s buckingham vs. Hayes
3g9 PIummsr VS. Pope.
80 brooks vs. McKanna- .
LAW CoURT-H g. Lee, Jttdge.-The
order OF business yesterday wac as fol-
lows:
az Boro vs. Sa Mt, attachment for witness.
Isl Bras 2 Hudson vs. Adams. tpdslasnt for
p!ainLd to tue amoRnt u 10
80 Finley vs. McGrath, continued by consent
IS NteEes y Richardson, judgment iNF pla n
Tvs Rishsrdson, Judgment for PLAZA
=, va Rlchsrason, judg >aent for plsin-
= tho ahove three csssS motion to dis
~ s-sa sITsties vas overrulsd nla
q Wsver 81 al VS. HSekey, conana% by con-
7ss H sIa'; vs. Augar, Oonisoned in absence Of
ni aSaHs Is Taylor. continued on plaipprs
ao ps VINO vs. Groves. Judgment for plaintiff 10
the amount OF SS45 2
5u Hunt vs. Hsrris, ttectnent pending.
The following is the calendar for Co
day:
7es Howard vs Evans.
s4 Boyd vs. Baquett.
s7 Young vs. ScnoOl Visitors.
SB FlAnerty VS. smith.
052 same VS. Van NOast-
g59 Same Us McPOru&nQ.
94 Same VS. Sa.Be.
& same YsSttfEr I.
gs sam vs. Twoulg.
AZ same vs. TTezsvant.
SIS same VS. Twoh &.
e9 same VS. Hickey.
go same Is PomsToy.
The mandamus cases against League,
Clerk, are also set for argument to-day.
MUNICIPAL CoURT-Geo. W. HGtdfoTi
Ludge, etc.-COurt meets to-day a. tel
O'clock. Cases for trial are
I7ss State vs..
I7ss state vs. same.
1871 state We. Burditt.
CRIMINAL COURT YIN. HtLnter Judge.
There was nothing done in this Court
yesterday, owing to the unfinished con-
diti0n Of the new court room on Main
street. Court has adjourned over until
Monday morning, 26tn instant.
SHELBY CIRCUIT CoURT-G George w.
Reeves, Jud9e-Yesterday the case of
the State Va. VIM. Johnson, Indictment
for murder, was taken Hp, and had not
been concluded up to 8 O'Clock pm.
This-case viii likely consume greater
portion of the time Of the court to-day.
State Docket viii probably be conclud-
ed toby. r KITE