Ashtabula weekly telegraph. [volume] (Ashtabula, Ohio) 1853-1873, 1868-11-28

reterman vs. flautS-Clfu aSIOh'
ed at defendants cost
E. r. Blood VS.. P. Morgan-civil action.
Dismissed for noncompliance of costs.
A. Schrambling VS.. A. St John-civil ac-
ton. Plaintiff has leave to file amended
ton and the same is continued
H. Wheeler VS.. Peter Upon. Settled, each
party paying one-half of the costs.
Brett & Maltby Us. F. F. Adams-civil ac-
ton. Dismissed without prejudice.
Lewis C. Hyde VS.. N. W. simons-civil &C.
ton Settled and costs paid.
P. D. Flaw VS.. Francis Trimmer-civil ac-
ton Continued.
Martin S. Harmon VS.. N. c. Chapin-civil
action. Settled and costs paid.
Michael Brown vs.. John Blood-continucd
until next term of court
c. Alcock VS.. Mary Ann Wilkinson-set-
tied
Joiner VS.. Payne-civil action. Continued
Betsy Mills VS.. A. Smith-dismissed without
prejudice.
George Hall VS.. George Lawton-civil ac-
ton. Settled.
Mary A. Rowlcs vs.. n. Bishop-civil action.
The right of property in this case involved
Jury trial. verdict in favor ofplaintiff, and dam
ages assessed at cents.
Kolb & Koch VS.. James ACKNOWLEDGMENT
of $207 in favor ofplaintiff.
George Y. Watson vs. D. w. Gary-ciyil ac-
ton. Settled at plaintiffs cost.
Mary A. McElliott vs. Charles E. McElliott
Divorce. Granted; cause-adultary
Edmunds, Townsend s. Co. VS.. ]. B. Andcr-
$58s.A was rendered in favor of plaintiff.
Charles Bachelor VS.. Elizabeth Batchelor-
Divorce The defendant was accused of adul-
terry, and the court granted divorce, and the
care of the children into the hanns of the plain
tiff
e. Robinson VS.. W. NJ. Blanchard-civil ac-
ton. Settled at defendants cost
T. Caldwell and wife vs. R. H. Gordon-civil
action. Degree granted in favor of plaintiff,
$3.50.
Ohio vs. Charles Notwithstanding Ii
quors The defendant plead guilty and the
court fined him $40 and coats.
Ohio vs. c. B. Lamphear-Assault and Bat
terry Plead guilty to the Indictment and fin
ed $40 and costs. In the other two indictments
against the same party nolle prosequi was en-
tered.
National Bank of Sandusky VS.. J. B. Ander-
son-submitted to the Court and verdict rem
dered in favor of plaintiff of $840.93.
Joel Rice vs.. VIM Deane-civil appeal. The
defendant failing to appear, judgment was
taken in favor of plaintiff in the sum of
81 ,2S057.
c. Northrup VS.. Jas. S. Northrup-Divorce.
Granted and alimony allowed.
G.. Lemercicr vs. J. Condit-civil action.
Submitted to the court and verdict of $437 ,4S,
rendered in favor of plaintiff.
D. W. Hazeltine vs. N. Burrington-civil
appeal Dismissed without prejudice.
| E. Woodwork vs. ]. A. Miller-civil action
Dismissed for want of cause of prosecution.
| GrOken VS.. Brockway-civil action. Con-
| tinued with leave to defendant to answer.
O. A Rockwell, vs. L. Patchen, jr.-the
plaintiff RECEIVERS on note, 81, ,416.Os and costs.
C. II. Knowlton VS.. II. .;Knowlton-civil &C
| tion. Plaintiff has leave to withdraw his de-
murer, and the case is continued until next
term.
! Wv. Royal VS.. N. French-settled at
plaintiffs costs, except witness fees before JUS
tice. ya ma,
/ NH. Wiley VS.. J. wilson-civil action
This case is continued with leave to plaintiff
to reply, and leave to defendent to file amend
ed answer
R. Fl. Burr VS.. Lowell R. Morse-civil ac-
ton. This case was brought to recover dam
ages, by reason of fnon-complying with bar
gain for cattle bought of defendant, to be de-
nyercd at Barher's corners, Richmond 1t was
argued and submitted to jury, and damages as
sesscd in favor of plaintiff of s3O75. North
way, and Ensign for plaintiff, and Lee and
Kellogg for defendant. --..-
E. W. Grover VS.. w Henderson-civil ap-
peal. 1t is proved that Grover gave defendant
apackage of money 10 be expressed-the mon
ey never reached its :. destination defendant
claims that itwas handed TO Express Agent
Jury being out twelve hours fail ed to agree.