The Hancock Jeffersonian. [volume] (Findlay, Ohio) 1857-1870, 1868-02-14
Court Proceedings.

u
t Court of Common Pleas
= The State Of Ohio VS.. John More.
a hart, ct al, for burglary, was continu-
S ed as to Morehart and VIM. Enough,
f and nollied as to Henry Hammond,
|, w. P. Siddall and James Ramsay.
, The State vs. David Carney and
r Jack Brown, for horse stealing, was
: continued.
u The State VS.. Adam Beard, for
stabbing with intent to kill, was mol.
! lied.
The State vs.. John Morgan, for
stealing watch, was continued.
\ The State vs.. Ira Martin, for steal
ing sheep, and the State vs.. Ira Mar
; tin. for stealing horses, was nollied.
7 The State vs.. Wilson Hoy and
tSamuel Dennis, for disturbing religi.
z GUS meeting, was continued as to
Hoy; Dennis plead guilty and was
! fined. -- .--......-., .,..........
The State VS.. Joseph Ward, ct al,
for assault and battery, was mollied as
to all except Ward. 81
! The State vs.. Wilson Hoy, for
grand larceny, was continued.
] The State VS.. John M. Logan, for
bigamy, was nOllied.
The State vs.. Daniel Rohner and
Catharne Hugleshafer. for living in
astate of adultery, was nollied.
The State VS. James Collingwood
and James Stafford, for assault and
battery, was aoliied. lts5f 4ao-
The State VS.. Charles Ely was mol.
lied and the forfeiture of the recog-
nizance remitted on payment of costs
by Ety. gIa..e -ll a.f sss-
The State VS.. Ernest Kemp, for
allowing games to be played at his
grocery, was nollied. HI INK. -
The State vs.. Harrison Lemon, for
forgery, was continued
The State vs. William Biggs,
Franklin Biggo, William L. Taylor
and Alonzo Ward, for riot. was con-
tinued. gn7s Iaa
The State vs.. Elisha Corbin and
Hiram Cole, for grand larceny, was
nollied.
The State VS.. Samuel C. Harris,
for grand larceny, was continued and
Henry Brown was appointed special
prosecuting attorney to assist in this
case. {5l 1a8t
The State vs.. Samuel Moore and
Charles Fl. Wooden, for forgery. was
continued, and VIM. Gribben appoin-
ted special prosecuting attorney IN
this case, the present prosecutor hav-
ing been attorney for defendants in
the last two cases.
The State VS.. Nicholas Fox, for
assault and battery Fox plead
guilty and was fined S. and costs.
The State VS.. Franklin Monroe, for
forgery. Monroe plead guilty and
was sentenced to the penitentiary for
five years.
The State VS.. William Lytle, for
selling liquor. Recognizance forfeit
ed. El.a5 .l uf ere
The State vs. Franklin Monroe, for
grand LARCENY, was continued.
The State VS.. James Chain, for
burglary, was continued.
The State vs.. Isaac Armbracht,
for petit larceny. Defendant plead
guilty and was fined 50 and costs of
The most important cases on the
Civil Docket were disposed of as
follows aas 9
r.. r. Scott vs.. j. B. Cramer, dis
missed. Brown & Burket for plain
tiff.
Daniel Henry vs. Adam Altman,
continued.
VIM. d. Porter VS.. Joseph Ward.
Judgment for plaintiff against Ward
for $500. sI .ar .... ..
HI. r. Gage vs.. The First National
Bank. Decree for partition in favor
Of plaintiff. %
Timothy o. Began VS.. James
Mourning Judgment for defendant
Judgment set aside and new trial al
Iovaa 5IheEoiI STA -44i.e
John NJ gMcEwing VS.. William II.
McEwing.ii Judgment for plaintiff
and order of sale of property attach
ef1I0m TAI elE 50 - IlizH .iii. .-assl
George F. Orwiek VS.. Robert W.
MeNay ct all Judgment against Nc
Way for s23 80! Exceptions to the
Of the court taken and allow
ed. This case will 80 up to the Dis
trict Court. ~ 7a
Messinger.k Gillett VS.. Daniel W.
cass.'i Judgment for plaintiffs for
81, All 81.
Wm, Green vs. Jeremiah Green ct
all Court found for plaintiff 81 900.
Notice Of appeal to District Court
given. sq s1jnon 40 u -s--ii ~ lis
Bass Rawson VS. Trustees OF Pleas
ant Township ct al. Dismissed at
costs OF plaintiff. 4suoI oli b. 9sa
Francis NJ, Twining Us. McCahan
ct al, Judgment for John B. Nc
Cahan for SS4 Al and continued as to
other parties. sri Jos ~as }.
Charles w. Whitelc,ck VS.. John C.
Whitelock. Sale confirmed. Order
to Pay administratrix, $780, 5a
Wm.sL. Davis VS.. G. w. ISimcox
and wife. Order of sale of mort
gagged premises.
Edgar Lackey VS.. Gates o. Hama.