Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-12-18
THE COURTS.

CUFF COURTs-Hon. C0nnaHy f. TFfgg,
pTeSSd51g,-The criminal docket Of tnls
curt viii be taken up on peremptory
call this morning.
A motion VICE made through counsel
to prevent the discharge Of Nathaniel s.
Moore, bankrupt, on the ground that he
had sworn falsely IS to disposition of
property. A:s0, 2 motion made TO re-
hie specifications against Holdmsn &
Goldman, bankrupts. Granted.
The continued cKse OF Dr.. Bailey's wife
VS. st. Louis Mutual Lie Insurance. Com
pany was then taken up. The examina-
lion OF witnesses vas concluded, and also
a part OF the argument for the plaintiff
was heard. Messrs. Scott & Heiskell for
the plaintiff, and hIsssrs. Posson &
Humes for the defense.
CRIMINAL CoUET.-J. E. Biqslo,0.
Judge, etc.-In The above Court the fol.
lowing business YES transacted on yes
terday
In the case Of the State VS. Robert John
son, the j Try returned ? verdict of guilty,
& charged, and fixed his punishment st
tnree years imprisonment in the peni-
Tertiary.
10 the case ofthe State vs. W. F. Clark.
the jITy returned e verdict of guilty, and
hxei the period OF his imprisonment in
the peultentisTy at three y0sTs.
Ia the case Of tue s ate vs. james Cobb.
the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
Ia the case OF the State vs. Andrew
Jackson Clay, the jary returned q verdict
of not guilty.
The-cas Of the State vs. Thos. Coyne.
Indicted for murder, was continued until
the next term.
A no1s ProseqUi vas entered by the
Acknowledgement in the following cases
State VS. Sim Vanpelt, larceny.
State vs Mitchell Scott, receiving stolen
goods.
State W John Wilhelm, attempt to COM
NIT q felony.
TIE following cases are set for trial or
IL State vs. D. Saneer, obtaining goods
- by fAlse pralenoss
81 State VS. VIM THOMPSON, larceny.
AZ VS. Gaia Bedford, /"
&c va Swee1y * Williams, rob-
berry.
20 " VS. Adam Dowdy, burglary.
81 VS. Dock Pearee and John Har-
ris, larceny.
81 vs. John Burt and Henry Cald-
well, burglary.
ll5 " VS. Alfred Murray. larceny.
l23 E" vs. Charlotte Harrington, lar
ceny.
l31 VS. Laura Washington and EN-
ms Johnson, larceny.
~ I" vs. L. Johnson, L. Malone and
5. Mack, rape.
All witnesses summoned must be in
or fosfeituras viii be taken |
them.
Law CoURT-H S. Lee, ,Judoe.-Yes.
fprnQUla nQlGnAar nyaa anF.--E- |
d. The eases inserted below viii be-
for trial to-day. The first and last
two cases were specially set for to-day.
l447 Dsvie vs. Bolton &c al.
L543 Roach VS. Yeates.
1913 Fahnestoek ct al vs. F~arnsworth ct
81.
Bcsekstt & Co vs. Early.
.54S Waidron VS. Forrest ct Al.
-o45 anderson & Gay VS. Walker.
I3sG Abls vs BsrnWel!.
.53l Wa!dfon vs. Creighton.
.2oz Walker vs. Payne ct al.
DOS LoWenStein vs MeNair,
.555 Bates Va Bfyson.
Dos watson, trustee, VS. TOpD ct al.
-557 TObin, Lynn & Co vs. Jourdan.
-55S Wiikerson & Bridges vs. Same.
SEQ kraus Il Co VS. Saiffmsn 81 al.
.56i B1esoher vs. Caro-.
$50 Steiner Bros VS. same.
1858 Lehman 4 Co VS. same.
.564 Franciole and wife vs. Hopkins,
admit
$50 Ssmmes & Co vs. Lephsm.
1868 COggswell Va Fightman.
1867 Mahan VS. Tsyler st 81.
1855 Hamilton & Black veil VS. Wright
eft al.
1869 Church VS. Jones.
1870 FsrnswOrth & Co vs. Dickens.
Psrte VS. Coggswell.
1873 Kimoall & Bros vs. Constable & Co,
1874 C~ruikshank We Pool.
1915 Richardson vs. Evans.
1922 Packer We Holland ct al.
1851 Vincent vs. Sample ct al.
1883 Jennings Us Huff.
CHAHCERY COURT W7a. II. Smith, |
Chdncetior.-The calendar OF cases pub
Iished On Wednesday was concluded
yesterday. To day is motion day. The
roll of attorneys will be called, COM
mepeiDg at letter "Y."
MUNICIPAL COURT, q. ". WdldrGn,
6 few cases were tried in
his court yesterday. The attention of
the court was mostly occupied with the
lass of the State OF Tennessee vs. Wheeler.
pending the trial OF which, the court ad-
This case viii be resumed this
morning., after the disposal of which the
sourt will take up and cali for trial the
lntried cases on yesterdays calendar.