Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-12-16

specially set for some other day during
the term. T~wenty-three Judgment
were rendered. The following cases vii
be called for trial to-day
IAj Henwcoi VS. Ers,ey-
ll0 stale OF Tennessee VS. sSesd, MoManus 4
Co.
1923 Hampton VS. Mississippi Valley Insurance.
1875 Powers VS. Treat.
1873 Smith VS. Bell.
1851 Mount VS. Bumer1 ct al.
1897 Grannel VS. Williams.
1888 bruce 4 Co VS. Jones'.
l3A call VS. Waggener ct al.
lcaj Frank q Co VS. Clayton.
1851 Gritiing Il co VS. Memphis Association
Course.
las7 Farley CT al VS. Jones Ell al.
IS Paul, adm'x, Us WOOD, admir-.
- Bruce q Co VS. Toohig.
li9J LiItletoa VS. Waddeli ct al.
1874 Miller VS. SommerYtle.
li9Z Near & Hickman VS. Rufia X %Flnney.
1875 Milburn VS. Fitzgs raid.
1884 Allen, use, etc, vs. Cant.
,49j Aiken q Larkfn VS. same.
l49t Allen VS. Gleason.
iIsT Murphy vs. Mississippi and TENNESSEE Rail-
Iooa company.
1895 Carnart q Bro vs. SelEg.
l4sS Waidran, use, etc, vs. Sellig.
l5yU ~brinkley VS. WigglHs.
1901 Kay VS. English.
l5U2 Winters VS. County of shelby.
10 . franklin VS. SontherR hxprsss Company.
l53 Ssyers VS. Rocco.
1905 Sullivan VS. Mayor Aldermen of Mem
1903 Mcfarland vs. Same.
l5C7 calvin VS. same.
1 O5 Foley vs. Same.
1913 Carhes vs. James ct a..
l5l0 First National Bank VS. LswlssS ell al.
loll SiatteIy VS. Mayor and Aldermen OF Mem.
l52 Turnali ct al VS. BastIand & Gilbert.
l5lS Martin VS. Montgomery.
1919 hothrock VS. Grant.
l5l5 Tepnesses Fire aud Marine Insurance
49,, company VS. Payne.
I5l6 CamI bell VS. same.
1917 WaidTan VS. Putnam OF al.
lots Farsbee VS. Delap.
1913 PERKINS VS. Newman.
CRIMINAL COURT. E. Bigelow,
Atdge, etc.-In The above Court the fol
towing business was transacted on yes
terday
State vs. F. Gatti, indicted for larceny
The jury returned a verdict OF guilty,
and fixed the punishment at three years
in the ~penitentiRTy.
State vs.. VIM. Adams and John RI
ley, indicted for larceny. The Jury re.
turned q verdict Of guilty as to Riley,
and not guilty as to Adams.
The case of the State VS.. Oven Nc
Partland, who was indicted jointly with
John Winters, for murder, was abRted
on account Of the death of the delen-
dAnt.
State vs. Thomas Prewitt; murder. 4
continuance was obtained until the next
term.
State We James Cobb; jury, and verdict
not guilty.
The following Is the calendar for today:
% State VS. W F Clark; Larceny.
30 slate vs. SIN VanPelt; larceny.
70 State VS. ID Z Williams and Henry Sweeney :
robbie y.
Is : state vs. John Ryan lerceny.
~ Stale VS. A J Clay larc hy.
~ Stale VS. JOnn Wilhelm Hffcmnt tn rrvnp II
a fe-Ony.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND CIR
CUT CoURTs-Hon. COnn0Hy F. ILigg,
preSiGiag.-The peremptory call of the
criminal docket OF this Court will be
taken up on next Friday morning.
Messrs. A. C. Minor and Crocker were
excused from further service or the
Grand Jury during tins term.
The case of James Thomas, jr., VS.. J
3. Sharpe & Co., was then taken uo. II
appears that Mr.. Thomas was IN The
habit CT drawing drafts upon j. B.
Sharpe & Co., after being informed Of
the amount OF sales made by them; that
ct the fall OF Memphis MessTs. Sharpe &
Co. had made sales TO the amount OF
$1,000, no account of which they ever
made 10 the plaintiff until 1866. The
Court decided that from the evidence
given, no Instructions, expressed or i'm
piled, had been given 10 the defendants
to sell for Confederate money; eoDse-
quently there was no illegality in the
transaction under the existing laws of
Congress relative to traffic In the above
mentioned money.
The jury, after q short retirement, re-
turned a verdict for the plaintiff of $3.50.
A petition of involuntary bankruptcy
was presented against TTehman Loeb.
The argument will be heard this morning.