New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-09-03
connected with Madame Rachel This first letter ran as

connected with Madame Rachel This rst letter Eah as
SS only Ky S MTs i PER hen 30: i sf
when she was school gH fathers 6t gilt to her OLY
S ye Gny o Won ssI 70 me iTf S oa had @
gotten to send forgot yesterday Ash Wednesday Let Old
What Is lie viii Woman She seems out
Sq' l 5 not l @ S own % o Ss s 5as for
her darling Love h ny TS one all all VII be Te n few ss,1 s3o
ny hearts M Bear my fond one and shall be your feet: those
letters naughty little pet aud you have not answered You IN
abo.' your brother With ioHd an devoted qys oil
She again parted with some sl,4OO and they would
have to decide whether Lord Raneaghs name was used
for the purpose OF operating upon her mind Madame
Rachel not satisfied with the s2AOo, but from time
TO time obtained every single thing she could Lay her
hands upon jewels money, dresses, ana even her plate
There another letter. which was Of the greatest I'M
pOrtance, which ran
Ny OwS DARLING MARY why DO ron not 20 as Gann s yGp
Way put obstacles the way o. your own so e
psop viii Se stop5eJ therefore il VIII not matter you SIN
paper my hears le will everything not We aue OF
loving and ng WIZ DO yo doubt NY honor ,ncey what
mne rsatsieI you to etarn them and for the f you
fused DO Mary love have sent them to your a say 49,
II you wanted my hie would lay It down az your 0wa
feet MARI you ere my Joy Se yoa Letters S 5D soS seTyps
to o SP s Why necd a a ny own va I
believe METH aG' I5S S sIEs ss y T all Yo4 e1oted
w" PRIV" ' ~ w WIZ w ~ ''WIImLM"
He need hardly say that Mrs Borrodao got nothing in
return for her money All she got FOR her 81 $50 was
packet Of powder 20 put in her bath He would can Lord
money from Mrs Borrodae, and that his name had been
fraudulenty made use by cunning and deceitfu w0
man and he had no doubt when the jury had heard all
the evidence they would pronounce a verdict when
would cleanse London OF one OF It's fOulest stains.
immense number Of letters were read on the part OF
Madam Rachel, during the crO5s-examinat0n OF the
prcecutrx all OF which written by Mrs BOrrOdae
the inference TO be drawn from them all beng tat sic
was in correspondence with one man. and had an0tner
as a paramOur. The prOsecurix swore that Rachel the
prisoner, dictated the whole OF the letters, wold Ior
word and that she understood word OF any one
them when she wrote them, but that Rachel told her
they were necessary order make Ranelagh jealous
and It may be mentioned that in several OF the letters
Rachel the prisoner ~ spoken OF as the pest irlehu
OF both parties The fact OF Lord Ranelaghs
constant visits To the prisoners den or lnfamy was
severely commented upon by the counsel on Doth
sides and there can little doubt that the cOuntenance
persons he has enabled tho woman 70 ply her
tradelmnch longer than otherwise would have done
There seems very little sympathy on the part OF the
raordlnary sample Of vanity and diOcy cOmbned but
the time, all agree TO condemn the prisoner ana
although the powerful and eloquent advocacy OF SDy
Seymour caused the jury to disagree, ana give hera
sptc unt the next sessions yet her race is run and In
the language Sergeant Ballantyne, London has been
cleansed OF one Of its fOulest stains"