New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-06-20

that no such agreement had been alleged had been
entered INTO between the plaintiff and eight other Stock
holders TO share all the profits between themselves that
they simply the original ineorporaOrs OF the com
pany and that beside themselves there were 100 Bona
stockholders representing stock to the amount OF 1bo
who Of course entitled TO share IN the earnings and
property OF the company proporonaey 70 tne respect
put by plaintiffs TO show that these stockholders
we're not bona de purchasers, and the argument WI" Do
continued today
In the United States Circuit Court, yesterday
Judge Nelson heard tine appeal in Admiralty OF the steam
propeller Vaughn against the barge sherman and at the
serving his decision Deputy United States District Az.
torney Ethan Allen, about two weeks ago. prepared ana
left the Court for the Judges signature. the final de-
cree OF distribution OF the proceeds Of the British
blockade runner Cheshire aud portion OF her cargo
forwarded to Washington With the amount Of the pro-
ceeds, about $4,000. which amount Is now ready for dis
ribuon among the officers and crew Of the vessel cap
tried The Cheshire was captured In 1901 by the Unted
Charleston blockade with valuable cargo. consisting
mainly Of supplies for the Confederates The vessel and
all the cargo condemned by Judge Belts, in the
District Court Of this District and the regularly
appealed TO the Supreme Court OF tho United States
which reversed the decree to portion OF the cargo,
but affirmed IL as TO the vessel the remainder Of the
cargo which latter were Sold and the proceeds paid into
the Registry Of the Court.
A very important real estate case, involving
the title 10 the lease of certain premises on Broadst
Wast, New-st, and Exchangeplace, on the corner OF
Brosdway AND AND has been on decided in the
United States Circuit CourtIn equity The following s
the opinion OF Judge Blatchfordi 49,.
Tb. has Jurisdiction the relief sought by the plain
tfN
plaintiffs joined proper parties defendants the
III These four pieces property must all Of then be deceed have
been copaBep property Of the 6m Of Bra GoOddse Co.. and
such 20 have been personal estate and not real estate
w. The plaintiffs by bringing this snt after eThaustng their remedies
the State Court have acquired
allen preference priority be h paid ont o the proceeds OF said
four Of property 10 the exclusion Of the other creditors OF Ezra
Goodndge 4 Co. ..... ...-- .... -. ...
" This having Jurisdiction OF the by reason Of the inu
the enforcement Of the legal
the pa and beoause that the remedy Afforded
them Intellectual the question will Apply the
property the satisfaction OF the PLAINTIFF Judgment directly BY It's o"n
method Of proceedings
VI The Judgment Of the plaintiffs reversed In
Of the State ofNewYok objection 10 the granting OF the re-
lief prayed for
VII The widows Of Ezra GOoddgs and Franklin Randolph are
entitled dover such property until the trust thus existing
favor Of h plaintiffs creditors the eOpaRsrsbp In respect 10 such
property, Is fully eIecuted -. 80.
VIII The bill dismissed The Broadway and Thirty third
A. property
TX decree will he entered In accordance with these views and leAv
Ing the rights Of the holders ofthe the property