The Orangeburg news. [volume] (Orangeburg, S.C.) 1867-1875, 1868-03-07
GRIGBL TbRAIL, &C!
.saEes9s y Ess Egszsa il. ssUp0

.dati iI 8disi disi6s,oa EsGi6f, sn1SC urssslasa woIk,
z; s. the 0tiasailyaM saysaaanxAao
- We add another extract from the, work pn
the advantages Of 2,dyed coos, subject which
perhaps will be of interest to dairymen aalssp esssppec
a2 tis time, when th therJg J is $50 So much III dichl
,aosyia, obtaiping good milking stock, and yaimapy
RSaist&ntl VI ly, sriia ~ ag @
lowing gfensom are, given by the profes
s0f WY daitStien should sldy their coSs when
80 not FIJI breeding lszgg =
{: siab s1tf Spayed more seaslakep lin
gold condisiJn 3han 't "a, ss 5
.Et&I They are less liable, to; o;,sickuesarof mn
spis0otio Rhd and when sis nor go5ta1P 5saspa papd
u easy Of cure. : ''''"'
as When episooottiis0 diseases are present i'm
. the vicinity, OF even in the herds spaSsd COWS
arc always in condition and Et for,the butcher,
no andto prevent ltss anda save expense in the
~ ~ aSnt Yth the atteadapt risk If loss of
I: some, and lossof fconditionand milk ofall that
i,s sfa sIats asetsdsfhs sold not at loss as
.,ssisethe withrcows not spayed, and when
'aao'plsufo pnednonia ahi6Hg them g ,''ge'
10 .,,t4 fspayed CONS give the same quantity and
s.duality Of milk all the year round, if they arc
properly red or!s'" ~, - z, ~, ,, ~,
xTsnapayod COWS will give the year round
ass mSGch i&ilk as double the number of cows
not spayed, thus sSaSidg the interest on the out
lay. for ten cows, together With The absence Of
risk from lossiof some, off the principal by the
no deathof one or more fromsickncss OF accident
80. not to speak Of the feed Of ten cows The feed
sn.of ten, acows,and the manure of TEN cows the
' = frmerE stand best tell the difference in their
!: value ahi - stasis II liis i.aan Ts ciiqi1
bs1s s6 nyithspayed cows there is norisk to run
III foyer, nor trouble with cows cows called
1ei buliers2 b9rssaa& ii.ts tioidytsi ,st4i,ay,I
5s ppyed sdS da5isa afs fattonod.
"S, Spayed cows cannot abort or stink their
& caiyes,'" t.S d. 'nl4Q ss9noiasiiamee >,
The disadvantages aro summed up under the
two following heada:IA f7
"The expense Of tho operation and, atten-
dant risk of the animal dying, although this is!
50, not great-7,asbopt about one in hqndrcd7--anl the
aoie1peuse ofthe operation will be from So to s5,
y ia which viii depend upon Il the opcr-
.as,ntor has tostravel, and how many animals arc
thfto, be 5peFated upon III y - ,e4e 4a
J" 'ns 5 spas ed cows are aptto accunpiiulato fat
and .Resh $50 that they viii become dry much
soonerlt than ooWs not spaYed. =, Still there can
she littleloss, fora fat COW isalways ready for
sale. These, then, are the objections to spay-
. ing cows. if objections they may be called We
now leave tho subject to those who arc immc-
I diately interested. q e ~ :sSe,g .it
'ttss We have never heard of any trial being
sx made Of spaycd csWs sW in the dairy districts Of
s'&Nsw ork, but have frequently seen statements
e Of the profits resulting from COWS WHICH had
,Iebeon sspayea eind Europe. The question Of
.,a.tfofit isone Of considerable Importance to tile
u dairymep; and Mo should be glad to see the OK
a'aperiment tried on few animals, at least, to
fally;test its comparative merits. .,,-s 'H,g