Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-06-14
THE COURTS.


CHANoERY COURT Vim. III. Smith,
Choncelor.-Th following orders and
DEGREES were entered on yesterday:
Singleton vs. singleton, order to supply papers.
Birdie VS. Pope, final decree.
HAkneSs VS. Pope, final decre9-
Berry VS. Pope, hnal decree.
stanton Va Lewis, leave TO Withdraw de nurrer.
stanton VS. Lewis, order OF sale.
Trader VS. q ggiD, order OF refer nce.
Bank OF Chattanooga VS. Bank or Memphis,
order OF reference.
Webb VS. Montgomery, hahl decree.
Watson VS. Stalks, reference received.
erode VS. AlEers, reference renewed.
WoffJrd vs. Avery, reference renewed.
Kerr VS. Kerr, 1al decree.
Podesta VS. Art, order Of reference.
Carts VS. Eddins, Injunction d-ssolved condl-
Wilkerson vs. franklin Insurance Company,
new parties made defendants.
PasEini VS. NJ. q A. OF NJ, motion TO dismiss.
vi kerson VS. Franslin Iosuranos Company,
sCcree on petition.
Newsom vs. Taylor pre- confesso.
Howard vs. Bland, amendment.
But er VS. Daire. final deer e.
Jones VS. Greeniaw, reference
warner vs. Meyers, pro confessO.
O'Donneu VS. Cox hual decree.
Carson VS. avidsDn. title vested.
Page VS. CommereI 4 Ba X, publication.
But OF vs. Ticks. pre- con fesSo,
Butler VS. BurlI, pro cOnfessO.
Cox " Rltehsn, pro cOnfesso.
Ssarcy " Bradley. PRO confSSSo.
Watson vs. McKenney, reference renewed
Gait. eX parts, trustee appointed.
rriCe vs. Parker, IN eri OcutOFy order.
sharpe VS. Davis, motion 10 dismiss overTuled.
Hines vs. snOwden, motion to solve iniunc-
ton.
Kerr vs. Wsre order masinE party.
ford VS. Ga ner, nterlocut Bry order.
Buck VS. Williams, fRat decree.
Jones VS. GresDla1, sale and appeal.
MONTGOMERY VS. WalKsr pro cOnfesso.
sanderlin VS. Graves, motion to dissolve injune-
Hsi,man vs. Foster, decree on decision.
rI,o oat,coo dacfaaH by tho EhanaaIlOr
on yesterday were:
Hal man VS. Foster, amended bill to be a ed.
Plummer W NJ ers motion overruled.
Morton vs. Taylor, on exec ptions.
B-oWn VS. Walker, demurrer Overruled.
U'Donnsil W Cox, decree as prepared.
q sham VS. Eigington, demurr overruled.
Ackei man VS. Etchyane, motion 10 dissolve
Oy5Truled.
Podesta VS. Art, reference granted.
The cases set for hearing on Monday
are: Walker vs.. Trigg, VIM vs. Knapp,
R Jbinson vs.. Tsffe, Parker vs.. Parker.
The Clerk and Master will take an &C.
count, on Monday, in the case of Me-
Clesry VS.. Case ct al.
CRIMINAL COURT. - YIN. Hunter,
| Judge The trial of the case Of the State
vs.. 81. Observation-Disclosures for ma.
licious shoOting-has not yet concluded
/ The argument will be heard on Monday
MUNICIPAL COURT Geo. W. RaLdrdn
Judge.-The cases set for trial on Monday
next are:
Ga to $50 The state VS.. Beers, keeping gaming
house.
/ lbs to lbs The State VS. Kirwin, brlbins voters
| Il35 The State VS.. McGhCe, accepting
| bri Q.
| 1871 to 1888 The state vs. Krwin, brIbing voters
1850 The State VS. Dismukes & K sllOg
| resistiug Oftieer.
| l6 The State vs.. Creighton, unlawful
| gaming.
/ 1913 10 1917 The State VS.. G4rvey, unlawful
! gaming
| 1854 II 1873 The state VS.. Brown, keeping gam
| ing house "a
| 1854 to 1852 The tate VS.. Van Rrocklin, unlaW
| full gaming
/ 1894 to 1910 The Il te vs.. McGinnis keepin;
house Of fams,
1923 The state VS. Marphy, assault anC
- ttery.
BANKRUPTCY COcRT.-G, u LdfHotH'
Re0ister.-An assignee wSs sppolnIer
Ia the cases of Joseph J. Worrell anC
Benz. +. Sitter. Discharges IN bank
ruptoy were granted on yesterday to O
e sheppard and P. T. Hudson.
SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT-GeoTge "
| Peeues. ,Jitd0s. Motions were heard Law
side) on yesterday. The trial docke
naw side) will be .sken up on Monday
| ord tried roOUl ri Y