Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-02-12
TIE couETs.

-
U. S. CoURT-ConaGUy f. Hig0
Judge.-The following cases we're dis
posed of on yesterday as follows:
D1ugl sss VS. Bseeher, report connr ned.
Haywood ct al VS. steamer Little sam, order o
DunpinS vs. Steamer Cherokee, decree for com
Jones VS. AndregTs1 d. cree dislnisslng bill 10
want OF jurisdiction.
The following additional petitions IL
bankruptcy have been fled up to Febru-
airy s, 1868:
A. q. Vacearo, Shelby county.
George W. Moreland, Fayette county.
John II. Bswen, She by county.
J D. Baw, Fayette caunty.
Hans Lemon, Snelby county.
Win. !. Parnam, MadisJn county.
SHELBY CIRCUIT CoURT-George W
Reeves, Judge, etc.-On yesterday Mr..
Thcmas w. Turley was admitted as All
attorney Of this Court. The case OF p.
r. Peyton, Indictment for obtaining
money under false pretences, was com
menced on yesterday. 1t will probably
be concluded to-day.
Law COURT-Jan1es o. Pierce, Judge.
t Parties summoned as garnlshees can
come in and answer In Court to-day.
Court meets at the usual hour this
morning.
CHAECERY COURT I'm. M Smith
mnnceRor-The orders and DEGREES en-
tered on yesterday were as follows:
Young VS. Young. nnsl decrfe and appeal.
Hodges vs. Coleman order nisi.
Sen bel VS. Mo re. commissioner appointed.
Hig .ius VS. Freeman hnal decree.
Stale. e C. Us HalOi e, cnel decree.
Ferrj vs. Wolf, hnal decree.
Schsbe vs. Moore, reference 10 Clerk and Master.
Mosby VS. hunt, reference 70 Clsrk ana MaS,er
LageInsrzinO VS. Loriginotu, reference 70 Clerk
and Master.
Garvin " Hannd, decree for defendant.
shulh HES vs. S.ibert, writ Of possession.
The case Of Tomeny VS.. Eaton, set for
hearing on yesterday, was continued uu-
Ill Tuesday next. The Clerk and Master
will lake an account to-dsy in the case
Of Hoag vs.. Avery. The csuses set for
hearing to day are
Witherspoon vs. Grosgenor.
953 Bach VS. KILLER.
I SIS HarbeIt vs. FInnie.
| gE3 zones VS. SperCer.
80 Honstedt vs. RatalsEL
38 Simmons rs DunEanl,
5 6 Moon VS. Nelson.
$50 JcdsOn VS. y lLne
so B-thel VS. Same.
I ~ Pottery Sir-Ccs
4Gl Morris vs. Sc don.
43 hi / vs. Dave.
4D5 Hil rs Anderson.
( 400 GayOsO Savings Institution VS. COnDeu.
LoUuIis vs. FiannenEteihl.
CRIMINAL COURT HB1. Hunter, Judge.
| Tae Grand Jury on yesterday was sworn
IN aud charged by the Court. The names
Of the gentlemen composing the same
are rs foliows: A. ]. White, foreman
w. w. ~Scho6lfeld, W. II. Kennedy, J.
D Wimberly, H. E. Gerety, J D. Jones,
| Patrick McNulty, Owen Mccormick,
| G. McLain, ]. NJ. Leonard, f Litsom,
A. G. Tucker, II. Hsrder. To-day the
| first call of the criminal docket will take
place. The following order was made
" All parties who have sued out warrants
| before magistrates must appear and pros
ecute the same before the Grand Jury, OF
forfeitures will be taken on their bonds.
Omcial: r. S. Capers, D. c." The
| case of Angelo Mare has been set fol
trial on Thursday next.
MUNICIPAL COURT George w. Val,
dram, Judgs.-The cases set for trial to
day are as follows:
Z GS Walker Bros & c VS. Beaunlont ftux
2Z5 Meyer and Aldermen Of Memphis ys holl
30 Wi Jams q CO vs. schultz.
33 Mayor and Aldermen OF MemphlS vs. Mart
SEQ same rs Tuieme
$50 Same vs. U'DODnell.
40 same VS. Wagg6ner.
.O4 Same vs. BuFE-.
4B same VS. CrOtty.
as Same vs. CastinO.
$40 Same vs. Fdb-i
! go same vs. C0urCh.
dNs Same vs. Pane.
$50 Same VS. FlaheTty,
7UD same vs. MCCues.
.UI same VI Nugle.
7p2 same vs. Dixon.
$50 Moier vs. Alderman.
81 Kenne-y vs. AckermGn.
10 Kenue y vs. Heron.
III same vs. same.
! rs same VS. same.