The New York herald., 1868-05-14
D,maeH on the AnsIo-PnpnI Conspiracy.

DisraeH on the AnsIo-Papal Conspiracy.
In the House OF Commons on the 3oth OF April, Mr..
Disrae In concluding a BRIEF speech In opposition
to the adoption OF the first OF the Gladstone re-
solutions on the Irish Church, said-Sir would
willingly have sat down this moment only that would
be dscOurteOus to an honorable gentleman who
spoke early In this nights debate and spoke, too at
some length. refer 10 tie honorable baronet, the
agreeable and clever speech, which l may describe
as an amable inyective against myself IA laughl
offered some very severe but courteous comments on
ought perhaps to answer. But there was one which
am particularly deslrous or noticing, because 1t
founded on what think he will ind am correct In
characterizing as misconception on his part, and
on that OF his friends. The honorable and learned
gentleman seemed to be offended because described
some honorable gentlemen In this House as "i,oman-
ists'-1"hear, hear' from Sir q. OL0ghen)-and an
honorable gentleman who spoke last night said that
had given him nickname because l had called
him Romanist. certainly had no intention In using
that word to say anything tna should be In the least
degree offensive; and rather think that the honor
able baronet, who has great literary requirements
and powers Of literary research. will find that he Is
under q mistake. l myself have read most Of the
great writer's IN UsdOnO ce1tarne tu7i,tsQte eccesig
and believe remember the time when the word
''Romanist" first introduced. II was introduced
phrase OF Cancellation because there Is another
word which Is connected with odious associations
and has been for long time, with the people Of this
word Anscan" WAS Introduced @ early early in shis de-
bate, adopted for the first time and repeated every
night In the nature OF correlative expression, i
myself OF word Of which confess should not be
ashamed were OF that religion to the correlatve
word ROmanlst. Therefore can assure the honorable
baronet that no offence was meant I won't refer
at any length TO the observations he has made upon
a statement with which closed my remarks before
Easter made those remarks advisedly; mean no
ofYence to any one present. but IL Ii my belief that
there IL In the English Church O party Of extreme
opinions-(hear hearI-wh0 advocate the disunion of
Church and state. was informed by an authority
upon which placed implicit credit that some lead
ing members Of that party had been IN habttual
communication and combination never used the
word conspiracy, but won't tight about words
with those described as ROmanists, without mean
ing any ofence; and for the rest Of the statement
that thew In open confederacy leave the House
to Judge Of II for Itself from the late divsion and
when the right honorable gentleman comes forward
with new policy proposing rightly or wrongly ne.
volut0n In the country the discovering OF tne Cnurcn
from the State, and boasts Of the majority with
which he can carry IL into eject, the HOUSE must
fudge whether under the circumstances II was unfair
Tor me TO say he represented the combination which
I described.
The Situation, Political, Military and FiDan-
cial.
The London Netrs maintains that II Mr.. Disrael
consents TO allow the second and third OF Mr.. Glad
stones resolutions TO pass without serious oppost-
tion and advises ner Majesty 10 permit the introduc-
tion OF bill based upon them he will be q safer and
more Trustworthy adviser OF the crown than the
needless and irresponsible councillor who from his
place In the House OF Lords aects to dictate both to
her Majesty aud TO the House Of Commons.
The London Post remarks that the difficulty In