Marshall County Republican. (Plymouth, Ind.) 1856-1878, 1868-04-23
kras 1ufsAHnERsr.

O0 l0e- Opt0lDG OF tllc Court On TIC iJtD.
the questiensof extending the rules SO as
to allow more than two 10 speak on side
IN closing was indefinitely pestpoRed-3
to 10 Mr. Evarts- announced that Mr..
SiaIbery was better, and would probably
be present on the 18th; and that the coun-
sci, wishing to avci1 delay, would proceed
TO offer documentary evidence The mes
sage nominating Thomas Ewing as Secre-
tary of War wss offered and received.
The message Of the President 70 the Sen
ate on the 24ih Of February was offered in
evidence. and rejected after considerable
debate Other documentary evidence was
introduced, after which the Court ad-
journed. fzzAE HAAS Va YMae
In the Impeachment Court, On the 10Th,
Mr.. Sumner offered en- order to admit all
evidence which might be offered; tabled
80 20 H. Mr. Stsnbefy still continued
too III to be in attendance, but Mr.. Evarts
announced that they would proceed as far
as possible without him. = Dir. Walter Cox
was called, and objection made 10 the evi-
dence offered through him; objection
overruled-29 to21-and Dir. Cox testified
that the President had wished him to con.
suls with Mr.. Sianbery, with regard to
having -proceedirgs Instituted to test the
constItutionality of the Tenure of-office
act, in the stanten-Thenlas case; witness
moved Thomas discharge, so as TO force
his committal and then apply for writ of
kdbeas corpus, but the discharge was grant,
ed; witness considered himself as counsel
for the President, but appeared before
Judge Carter as counsel for Thomas
and did not state that his purpose
was to get tie case in train to test
the constitutiCnality of the Tenure of
onIce Jaw, gu, suppose Tue court anu op,
Posng cOuns e. uiF'neu thc ooJecl' ne nad
Lever received auln9rlty rom me Attor-
ney ucnsiai VI iesleens ~ use 'he papers
On y ntcn ns proppstu " opsain dtto to4r-
santo; gu. lney were resurneo 20 nm
49,, 80 ~ y, ~. Sss. J YIN
setuai nies,ess soi In auu 1iI, Ae,iicA
10 use tnem IN tIGr aiscresion. X. aGier-
rlck vne1 lnat ne nv Was en- pio ls <. as
coul,sei py OVueIef nVfHss' I'm 'ne ga
and during the ihserview, the Attorney
General told Tine wisne 81. in the presence
of tho Presidan. 10 SEQ n ba could c.rrv
:, :, s.ss, - -, - 4. c. s.... ~, :.
wit s Of q ,sss@ e. eoEpss:: the fIssjdsPi !.
xyorL toea,he, 10 .ooo,nnI;sh a.. ~
pose: witness tessfmony- relative to
the GUOIIS mace IN q {00 case = WIS
similar tn that of NJ CIV
o. Perrin. of lang Is,a nd. ~ss c.lled
and tstified to seeire the President on the
Dist of february. shout two .. d, lin com
pany, with, Consre ssman Seeive C,ounsel
Then offered to prove that the President
informed hem Perrin and Seeiye) he had
removed stanton, but would coon send
into the Senate a GOOD name for the posi
ton tho. no Aid No, srt;c;neto rae;s,anco
a anfy I'fad Su iRs se asd
ment, the question was ruled out by The
Senate. Dir. Eyarts had nothing more to
ask in that v;ew and suOoested AN adjourn
mept Mr. Butler opposed it in q long
speech. after which the Senate adjourned.
JOSEPH n. Bradiey, attorney, washing
10. and Etpaf Welfs. son q Secretary
Vepes were-ou the i6th. summoned as
Witnesses for t6eHPSeside nt'i~
a.. 49,.
Aver 'hs eI,eLle 81 we III JH On. ~ ,sass
t tnn' an oIoef we Mss suop.eo.syC 70 10 :,
.i1s.s nc car ~ Oe-@.e, 90 Nou1 - VI