New-York tribune., 1868-04-04
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH.


.,sr Pof,.r ia fllflment Of the sentence ofth 'o"
ueitcc. rJ the trial, seems to ve.beeh tne ooiu
management o.. a rev movement, which II con'inuvu' -
lkclvto dow r in some important PaI ~ Enisco
rces of op.f.u at divide the two It,i;.ts aud
,ai1ns-s in INES called High Church OF hlu"'' "NU
low Churr. Eyaugclicas - ,oo,, rrrnoselv and
tb sngrr i tuess challenged by the BSop pI, niise,
Or Tying attack upon ay the CGv' the oTsument OF e-
i cCg5sr ., not unmarked by personal eenng anu h
e1Srcu S6 n afforded ground for an assault by the
Iashon ursu but l'r; lylis. ~ VIZ The
SaS ,S Ssa % made by The Bishop 70 the FG5PeetaGe o S,
aad oac o their order |S & Gr aTe IRON mnioy 3S Of
u rove Of the behavior Of Drs Boggs ana
s'nb. i'm a,r,ung to exclude Mr. Tying from me pre-
,,cts ~ brunswick; that they do not think me
canon was ,tcd to give them sneh uonopoS ~ Sle
cusc Of s0uls. no' simply within their own c9uSfegaVs
,,t i'm a tl congregations OF whatever denomination
vtlp tIe ,ri,irate limits OF NewBrunsNicki that no
- prayer in a Methodist Presbyterian or BAPTIST
rcL g er %nt int RsT@sSn SIkdd m Sr TyBe was
no, ce y" ~ t % and IT Is regarded by many members
of the ChurE grJuitonsly and wanonly dlslespeeuu
and INSULT ~ ud as evidently intended 10 wound the
feelings AMI ulr the influence Of his friends and asso
~i,c, i'm The ministry who had neither been presented
nor trcd and we're NOT therefore, subject to be thus
TIc H,ho'. hy add had 1t in his power to calm the
controversy "y icverng the 2dmonluon IN ern t have
found yOu guilty. aud ordered you TO be adH3ds, T p
IN lS&Sq Nc% hTa1 G ' S" %ihou i the cro Of D B5gss
and stubs ia now publicly administering lIls ]
speciay a. m Court decided hat they could no not admit
testimony as esahlshhg ] iUl ,e @ o ot been
vilt M III i ted by the bishops aud clergy of our
5nr ur ds o, 'ue 10 incidental and occasional acts of
1iiciaf = b., Q, permanent intrusion Oy one clergy
man into the usti>h OF another. - 90 -.
The the Diocese OF New ork seem 10 nave
given a. il IKE Interpretation when they PROVIDED Inat
when II is Sr.r~d to mSCrpoiate new fiiITi ~ ir ~ t
- tic clergy ould be asked 10 minister's officiating
The parish IN ms% 10 S0Ss hSTe Iistjnciy sane
Toned n uiu.- liberal Interpretation oi the canon man
.ford mn. te uf Baptism IN the house of parshoner
oi Dr Ecg,, Lcn he was the pastor Of parish III ms
ru>on required by the canon irGm & the pastor OF 'he
NardeuSa aud Nesify, OF sihs. % one & o MIN. liz nj al
ui.n the pttUrh concerns ana personal rights OF inc
,,inr than ttc preaching IN the Methodist Chapel OF
N.ruuswck could be upon the parochlal rights oi Dr
i;o2g- and d.. Stuhbs. -, -,
autars ou your trial that yonr venerable father the
l;rv DR. Tyu.. taking somewhat similar view OF the
.sluor with ny self baptized child IN the house OF 2
,roper of Dr SubbS, hut In that the mother OF
he cIrd was of DR. TyDg's pIshoners, temporarily
.lfid whom baptized in Dr Bogg's parish were his
1gIi-hcucrs and not mine Now thu iue court mas
ra wnt, tL rnJidcd or reversed by the General Con
vrufn will accord our practice 10 It's docislO ana
have un doubt will cccrfully obey this our adnoui-
.nn thrt YOU will also do the same.
convicted only authorizes such proceeding against
i'm case ne conduct himself in such way as l.
CONTRARY the rules Of the church and dlsgraceu TO his
oHt. II may naturally be implied from your present
hy Drs. Boggs and stubhS your ila ana tue sen
tcncc of that your conduct has been sacein
o1 r%r ST%Is M 5. mT.T f % ad in in tHe he midst Of
- lsbOrs, wcl calculated To impair the affection, the
regard, and the confidence OF his immediate rl.loners
ana Of the public at large. Ii is therefore my duty 70 re
that In lis case where The objection Was not made
10 your preaching at New brunswick by Mcssrs. Boggs
aud oubbs until you had entered into an engagement So
60 preach ana notice had De1n & Seh IN n9
have given the an interpretation more strict
Ifd Tcusve than that which the practical example Of
your Bishop and of the oldest wses and most expert
cuced OF our clergy had Jurtihed YOU m adopting ana
that although you have chanced to ee the one 0dt0 OF
This who has been argncd Tor conduct disgrace
u to his office, the sentence of the Court condemns
equally all men OF al orders IN me Church Bishops,
Priests DcacOns, who have read differently The law OF
the Church, aud especially it condemns Your Bishop by
whom for following his Interpretation of the canon
you obedience 70 tho decision OF the Court
II IS thought by maHy that such admonitIon, gentle
an 80 fe and clear In its facts would have eutirov met
bc rc1urements of the Canon. and would inevitably
have restored peace. The admonton which the bishop
lid denver had another tone, aud Will have different
Fif.t he culogized the Court and then he attacked Mr..
rgr.'s counsel. The Judges most intelligent, calm,
lud dlsPasonate men, who hat performed their duty
WITH paueuce, fairness aud Judgment The counsel Of
speech TO its utmost limits and left 10 form Of appeal 10
popular prejudice and passion untried.
Ilc Bishop then in a rather extraordinary and myse-
nous passage enlogized himself and accused not simply
wc du not exceed tho limits Of widely recognized
truth when express our conviction that scarcely any
toward Presbyter the kindness iorbearance, aud gencr
iy which has been shown by the present Bishop OF me
DOccse toward you AMI toward those connected with
;,,i of NJ TTme} WIsi crimes have fh@v committed
which called for forbearence aud generosity aud why
the connections irreGary arraigned before tho
church IN the Of simple admouition Of Nj Tying
flr NJ. stalking the meaning Of a doubtful Canon
Next comes argument upon the meaning Of the
canon where Mr.. Tyng's counsel are again rebuked:
such perversion" says the Bishop of plain facts
may possibly answer the purpose OF an appeal to head
long popular prejudice and passion by surely Il j.
unworthy OF consideration before an Intelligent Board oI
Trc>byters" SC. And then tlc following unpleasant
,yrture H. draVu Of Mr. Tyug's conduct and motives:
suppose that young clergyman with the ra'hnesS 80
natural 10 youth and fiery temper ana t0 narrow views
81 Christian truth should determine ~ h7 own Dnd that
pure gospel Of Christ. and that u was ms duty 70 go
into HAT city, aud regardless Of fear OF ayor 10 up
tie tsue standard OF the Gross suppose hc should betake
himself 10 a Methodist meeting house, ~ the near neigh
borhOod Of the two ministers OF that city for The purpose
oil using that edfce from Time to time citadel
from which hc might launch forth MS burning arrows,
send ont his more than anognonI word 10 destroy u
possible tile confidence OF tie people ia their pastor %
turi ihcr heads with new tangled ideas Of religion TO
influence their passion aud ~ TIME 10 .tr ~ ana organ
izt" &C. DC. A significant ailusOn T. madr 10 The tur
bulett aud hcady tcna'r and declaration lhat - We
8fe not left at liberty 10 preach any kind Of doctrine
The remark that the unrestricted liberty Of preaching
Ou,Jel fine sounding words which hId ready
tye, Inc preachng Of the Gospel may be turned ~
mems passions into disorder and sin and that f We
s dcduccd from her fOinuldTcs, aEd taught by hcr
great dvnes without false g0sse, and distorted incrne
Suinl-tiy The lneylagle conclusion li3Ih - oIeIuI
reading " the Bishops adnoniton ~ mat ~ the opinion
youthful rasucss and turbulent temper but marrow
Of Christian truth and that nc used ambiguous
wickedly endcavord destroy the confidence 0f the
Imscopal population Of New Brunswick m Drs. Boggs |
I'D Stbs, 10 Influence their passions, ana STIR up hd
game a violent opposition against those peaceful
STEADY going and courteous ministers
Th6 Bishop intniates that Nj. IAug Aud hs c0nn'c
ton, 10 not teach the church doclnut justly, a. u
taught 10y her great diynes but with false gns,eS ana
they ready TO make thorough change IN tlS t9uf
thcy bound To rclOuuCe the ministry, even II tg
nav hSyS 70 capend le.r , & i ni1 nt l, one I'm
the Episcopal church of those VIA" WIZ pt ~ IyOr ol tue