Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-12-29
H COURTS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT CIR
CUT COURTS Hon COaaGdy r. Irigg,
pTesidtng-rhe 0wDeFs Of the steaEiUGat
MiibFey. through counsel, filed speci1ea-
tious o~tieeting to charges made BY the
Marshal for Selling, etc. Ths answer Of
the Marshal TO the specifications together
Win the papers In the case, were sub
mlt;ed and decision reserved.
The Court decided 10 the case Of HOiz-
maa & Goldman, b~ankrEp1s, that as Pc
ltiOBing creditors did not file their speGl-
d~ealions in the time allowed by Congress,
although there were very strong spesih-
catlons, he would net permit them 10 be
He'd after notice had been given the
~osnkrnpts that their discharges were
ready for them.
The continued case OF Hubbell vs.
Chamberlain, to recover from the defend
Ant money and sugar left in his charge
% the approach OF the Federal sFmy TO
this city. This money was taken from
c1ambeFlsinis safe, by an employee OF
Chamsarisiais during his absence from
The city. Mr.. Clapp addressed the jury
IN conclusion for the defense, and Mr..
8secher in conclusion for the plaintiff.
Ills Honor, Judge Trigg, substantially
charged the jury that il Mr.. Chamber-
ain was a mandatory he vas bound for
the full value OF the goods left in his
charge, bat that IL he was a gratuitOus
baiiee be was only to exercise the usual
care OF property that q prudent MAJ
would take in the premises, and that If
Mr.. Chamberlain turned over the prop
erty to another party without the knOEi- |
edge or consent OF Mr.. Hubbell, he was
also bound for the value OF the property.
The Jury not having sufficient time for
consultation after the delivery OF the
charge, they reserved their decision ua-
I'll this morning.
The Jury was empanelled Ia the case OF |
Howard, SArgeF & Co. vs.. jos. Specht, |
and will be taken up on the opening Of
Court this morning.
AssIGSBEs TAKE NOTICE Ordered, l
by the United States District Court,
That all assignses IA bankruptcy who
have failed to report a. required by law,
DO forthwith make their reports to this
Court OF all funds received by them ;
whether deposited IN bank by them and
in what hank.
Law CoURT-H s. Lee, JHdge.-This
Court was engaged yesterday in dispos-
ing Of the motions called up from the
motion docket. To-day the irst BUSH
ness on the calendar Will be the exeea-
ton of writs Of Inquiry, after which, the
1AAS y - 80 - a. G%eL1 w. - - r 4
a s BrinkerhnR IS Wade.
t4ae Manning s. Co Is same.
ld2l Beard, use, etc, vs. saint, e1f.
l5T Frank vs. Sneli ct al.
ass Teylor, AeEgen Z HlsW Is Rotsrta.
E59 &lEerson rs ArnlstrOngs !
$3.50 Hunt Us Rodnsr, admir-. y
I552 Hamilton W Mckinney
1883 Wolcctt, smith q % Is king.
1881 Watson, trustee, vs. Donaldson e al.
1915 Same rs same.
1883 same vs. same. Il
1871 same VS. same.
'5SS WaddaIi Vs Ogden et al.
1859 Martin W MeLefie 5h. 4
1857 Johnson rs P8tmaH 81 al.
ts5 Comfy rs JOyee
l16 Allen ct 81 - CCggsweIl.
1913 style Us AndSFsOa.
1915 Anderson ct a. vs. Brooks
1902 Townsend vs. ncSle ct al
E2J Fratms VS. Mayer ana Alderman or Mern-
phts- |
I549 Anderson & Gay VS. Walker. /
Isl AoRtroy vs. Robinson, trustee, et al.
1t is thought that thesirst thrss esses
10 the shove calendar viii consume the
entire time Of the Court to-day. Cases
specially set for to-day VIII not be takeA4
up until the cases inserted above are dis
posed Of. This Court viii adjourn over
from Thursday to Monday, 9Th OF Jauu
airy, 1869, which will be motion day.
Attorneys will take nnt!gs that this viii
be the last motion day OF the term.
MUNICIPALC oURT-Ge0. ". Wntdraa,
,Judqe.lThis Court will hold q short
session this morning, for the pufposs Of
disposing Of q few motions for new
trials.