Brownlow's Knoxville Whig. [volume] (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1866-1869, 1868-06-17

81
REBz-ri McsuLLAE 7s }. W. MASON and J. g.
sHEHRILL.
In 1865 the Dlaatn brought her action .he Circuis
Court Of Henderson county the following Obligation viz
sI1OO co. On before day october sEhtssu
DaacaB MsM.5 ssd Re6ssss MsHiiaa, iis wife, sissss
hundred dollars, the la payment for 5er zad bought b.
''''' j. " MASON, rsE.LJ
g.. 3. sHERRfLL, tsE1Ej
The declaration max prsr Of The obZaoa ayers
that tho PLAINTIFF oooJigse Duncan McMiiian, Dor
aI- -. ~ A'lLs - slaes ne eAseu
sion Of the inuent sued on Leaving her as hs widow
viving him. Tbs ordinary breaches assigned dsce
ration, sstng down among other h which i
soTy notice Of special demurrer a. the obi.
sats9 susa on Va czsced jointly TO Duncan Modilss
whout proving tho personal representative Of Der hubaad
Ihs Circuit Court sustained the demurrer ahd dismissed
well settled doctrine that in the marriages Of I'm.
BroWn Hum 10 Bntt has sysr Jssn bsld t6st = if'.
antsnupta chooses aoton hor marrlags fg-o .eto
vested 70 tho husband Her right h0d such chost ans
m i.se5 % "a u ~ iiP = ~ s.sla'
sion ~ q husband in BIS i8timsHoss Vs. Whiron d
Bat this Obligation aol anis-nups lei contract or
msnt. II executed 10 the husband dari0z GOV
ton, "ior the last peyent ofho land b01gbt b. JssssR
Mason &C. Ihe plaintiff a. lac gs Of Dunsan aeMillzu
doc0assd, shown ~ Tie Of the Obligation tO rave
beneficial interest n q End the defendants have treated her
prsss promised 70 pay promptly 10 them hs smoant 81 tn
iA''atA titt obllEltiyl
oLsn n part sonsidsraon of the via IL to Lad
shtonsd Ia the no, that the Eals the Land s.d
ton o. tna Obligation Tor the purchase Guey such
fsdueou Of the proceeds u tbs sale POSSESSION o.
sae sus5and that the rishs Of action tr he busbsnd
DEAN dtd not survive 20 the vie.
n the cass Of Chester Green Hua -. taa Court
Nle discussing question somewhat aonayous she
under consdsrstl0nsays If tbs Wi the sale
q the real estate and oinB hsr hu shand couyeyane
y EIzdo according % thu forms Law without urter-
standing agreement that proceeds Be bold
vested Tor her that rGu1srassd Of
estate Of her husband al nsra5t gone
AID the Husband holds the con3itsraoa Tor which %
sod 10 his absolnts right discharged from ~ claim
any agreement undar1taudsn between husband
the Wiz that eompsnsatop shoud b made tho wife,
that ths hashand ahcud b regarded Der debtor for hs
Prccd or her proportion Of land sod and conveyed b.
thsn---kz Parts FaFbroughs sraa 2J2.
In this have 8cou the wife svaeBced By
face o. the obligation tasf proceeds
TIE 6as which the husband ala not IN his is attempt By
Blt othsrWi3e reduce hts possession snch
% tho wif5 after the death % her huabant
In the case oi Loppiu Pelra hllat1a 49, upon
Obligation being mado shat bond husband and gfo du
ring coVerturc husband iyng frt did not survive
clearly, said he t does survive 90 che wife a. az o
Gc d. though % To th5 she husbtaa ma
disagree the vs rgh it and bring the action IN the
bond his "a namB 0ay but I'D such disagreement the
survive.
The docisfue uud-r circumstances almost entirely mls
The uutsr consideration, Is announced In tb6
% Draper Jackson H MaEs4e0 3as also Chtty's
k-r Elmsndorf 10 John Rep i8 Rsdheld on wins uaq
M a. 20 SUB s. s.; also, story contrasts o. 81
and note
Il rssuu therefore, shat the Cireut Judge erred in aus
hi2ug The denurrr, shch tbs Judgment mat re-
7srssd ard the cause romaudsi with lave plead
MfLLIGAN, Judge.