New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-05-19

WASHINGTON.
Continued from First Page.

operation series OF influences intended to bear the
! MIR. sTEYENs-Wll my colleague allow me TO say that
do not propose the materials that shall get IN
] any way injurious TO the Court now In session 49,.
! Mr.. wO0DwARD-To the gentleman's resolution
itself have obecton but to the gentlemsns speech
objection. understand the gentleman, he wants this
Information for the purpose Of exposing the
cannot recoeet all his language but his ahSGaed on
those Senator'S founded the information that this Ieso
luton calls for Now against that sentiment whether
respondence with Senator'S or coming l care
| not how. against all that medding with the
important cause enter my most solemn protest as
thing indicate in the highest degree and indecent.
Senate constitutional tribunal wish 70 ask him y
he now considers the Senate constitutional tribunal
Mr.. WOODWARD = II the House win give me five
Hfs p CG nsssd Mr. to yield
Mr. STEVENS consented on condition that Mr. schenck
at the close Of his remarks would move the previous
| Mr.. sCHENCK-Mr Sneaker should like to have that
resolution read which has been pronounced by the gen
tleman from Pennsylvania TO be indecent. .,.
in my mouth which did not use so far from pronOunc,
ing the resolution indecent said expressly that would
Mr.. sCHENCK-Iheard the word indecent"
made support the resolutions not to the resolution
ThosPEAKER-The Chair did not understand the gen.
10 the remarks of his colleague. IL he had he should
/
| Mr.. sCHENCK-n the gentleman says he did not
charge that the proceedings OF his colleague was indie
heard the word distinctly twice. either as applied to the
remarks of the gentleman from Pennsylvania lar.
Stevens) to the proceeding which the gentleman from
Pennsylvania sought TO institute In either comes
with very bad grace from any man who should not be
which could hardly imagine possible to exist In
the case OF man VINO mas GSnSnncea TINS as no '0n
Mr.. WOODWARD beg leave to call the gentleman to
Mr. sCHENCK-I may not use tho exact words OF the
gentleman but will give his language, that may be
seen whether have Overstated It,
Mr. WOODwARD-The gentleman uses not only not my
erect anggsge but nothing Ike the Language
Mr. WOODWARD.What the gentleman alud lest, 70 was
argument used by me on tne floor Of the House as
that neither the Senate nor the House Was
gcmtIe@ans language Do not want his gloss Of t. Now
had made my disposition TO do this because mad pre-
pared resolution Of expulsion on that language, and
was only prevented from Offering by the expectation.
which was induced to entertain that another gentle,
who had taken share In the debate, would himsef
proceed against him. On the Goth Of February last when
this subject OF impeachment was under discussion Inc
gentleman from Pennsylvania said -
all legislation which have done does not constitute
No oour, Orgn try which the Consultation
% tbs o s sHoal 7 i - ri we're tSs
% sIS nu SS 10 csI uo and 10 that Of se Senate and
to issue proclamation sg 9n and the world n9se TIA. ss De
would subject the OHee he holds tru', from
sE lsI proposes .tIp him of Such
soa H1 .Is N.G rnS pd &,
Mr.. sCHENCK-That man protesting 70 be himself
such (e takes care Of that presume stands here
deBOunees proceeding under the Constitution by thls
mont proceeding not legally to be entered upon by
either because he says OF both that they are
wiser of the President would dsperse them by force
that virtually what his throat means do not wish
of his language as being proper or i'm;
proper Interpretation Of tnat langgage aud Therefore
ceedngs OF that be dared 20 stand here
In his place and denounce this House OF Representa-
tves entitled to find articles OF Impeachment and pre-
them aud the Senate as no body entitled under the
law try the impeachment and that he meant further,
and gave notice the shape OF threat that he
President he would step In and dsperse these two rag
and the mpeachers alike. Sir. repeat what sayi
had prepared resolution to expe that member from this
speaks, aud was only prevented from offering it
M Ar % SSSn S Ss
| Mr.. BCHENCK-Is he mott
Mr. MARsHALI-And shall insist that the debate be
confined 10 the resolution unless the gentenen from
reply 20 this attack upon him. which is nothing but
The sPEXKER directed the resolution be read and
unmarked that subject before the House,
aud that the debate must be confined 20 IT,
| Me- SCHENCK-I hold that what have been saying Is
entirely pertinent 10 these proceedings and tho gentle
man tMr Woodward would follow out tho position BIO
has taken and declare that being no House OF Repre-
scntatyes have right to make that request OF .aS
either in Sssye s or ANY 1hs5 but he puts
Ss oposition 70 The resolution on entirely different
grounds and shrinking 40 se. ,on
with which ho advanced revolutionary doctrine
ike that betore-ho now processes to con .ss
rsau,,on or what il proposes to do or Of tho
marks with which that resolution sought to DO Gus
bate and that II comes with igace from the gentlena
fros Ponnsy to oppose that resolution on any saea
SSS adScns position which he the record
ieot OF We have no power TO impeach
no power inquire Into these matters tnat lhtIe no
Senate % w o 20 SS tSa ought the
dent properly advised Us he Is capable OF ADVISING
Tho sPExKERNTho Chair thinks that this is beyond
the scope n the resolution The iorlner spcecn on o
ReDtleman Pennsy vana Is not now under review
ofore the House 1t should been objected to at the
MI. KELLY rep, Penn) The remarks were never
made in the House; they printed not having been
Dir. sCHENCK-Ycs; remember that one OF the
The sPEAKER-If there is objection, the gentleman
from Ohio will proceed In his line OF remarks but II the
objections be insisted on the Chair thinks 10 beyond
| the Parliamentary rules OF debate
Mr.. sCHEECK-Then 1t is not competent TO show IN
between tho position heretofore taken by the
gentleman and that which he now assumes r..or,,o,
before House. which has but single object on its
| Mr. sCHEHCK-very WE'LL then shall have to return
the floor with my thanks to the gentleman nom rem
| INF. WOODWARD-i ask my colleague 10 give me the
floor long enough 70 reply to the personal remarks Oh Inc
gentleman from Ohio. - 49,,
Mr BLAINE Gsep Me.)-Yes, that Is fair. lCrles Of
Mr.. sfEvENs~I do not know whether. under the
mott andsrstood the Chair TO rule them out
The sPEAKER-The Chat suggested TO che gentleman
scope OF the resolution, but that objection were not
made the Chair would not arrest his renarks II the
geneuan from Pennsy yields 10 his colleague the
| Chair Win rule In the sane way. -
MI. SCHENCK-n the gentleman Is to be permitted 70
Psos tse ~ taIior VIA remarEs =