Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1868-02-21
TIE COURTS.

UNITED STATES COURT-A.S y. Mitchell,
Cerk-Tke following petitions in bank
ruptcy have been fled since February Is,
1865, up to February II, 1865;
Il Van B, Thomas. Shelby county
B, W, WILLIAMSON, Shelby county.
n. Tyler, Hardin county,
Cuas. ID Brown, Madison county.
James c. nayis, WeaKley couuty.
Henry :. King, shelby county.
James L. Moore, Haywood county.
Vim. :. Bond, Haywood county.
b. p. Furrar, Madison county
James -. Glenn, Madison county.
David YarbrOugn, Madison county.
Thos. Murrell, Madison Ounty
Thos. j. Gardner. Hardeman county
; n. F-ccociI, Obion county.
Nm r PoFel' Der county,
David Ihiiman, Shelby cJuLtT
Geo. p. Turner, Fayette county.
James Sain, Hardeman county.
John G. Weaver, Shelby county.
I u, 4. Barnes. Shelby county.
q. A. Sulman shelby C unity.
IobnG g. Wanac Shelby cunty
4. !. DO enburg, she By county.
las. 4. &eaLLerhy. Madison county.
Root. f. Strfbbiing, Madison county.
CHANCERE CoURT.-WDa II. saailA,
Chancellor, etc.-The following causes
Rave been acted upon by the Chancellor.
Solicitors interested can procure the pa
pers by calling toF them at the Clerks
6Rsk
Friek VS. Donke-s.
/ Msur VS. DOnRers.
1 LsCroix vs. Don kers.
WOerne Us Dinkers.
Pointer VS. BriNkley.
/ McHenry VS. Dixon.
/ KalfsSi vs. ka.i slIi.
| Dsmukes VS. PfauLensteihl.
i BrOss vs. Iopp.
7 1ialstGssa vs. tunso.
The de6ress ana orders entered on yes
terday were as foDOWs
7 a-..n-.se ~ naghv nvTar Of RaF3~ann.
/ owen " FIoyd-MotiOn to dismiss Ovsrrulej.
Mills vs. N. v. Hotel Co.-Decrea Tor Trustees.
8 Ea8b vs. RObeTts-RspOTt confirmed.
MrfafsJ ~ Eoidsbury-Finai decree
Kufiu vs. 0utse-rNQal degree
To-day being motion day, the Clerk
will call the roll of solicitors, commenc-
ing at letter Y. The Clerk and Master
viii tsEa AZ account to-day at 10 o'clock
/ a.ul., ia the case OF iEssr 70, Mcconnell.
MUNICIPAL CoURT-Geo<ge ~. Wat-
dram, Judge.-The csses set for trial to-
day are as follows:
46 The State vs. slarterly,
AZ Same vs. =iatt5fi9 &u0amberlqin.
I 4I same VS. AchlnsJn.
/ esG same Ys Myers y o Doe. -
| 67 Same VS. LoYeiOys
The Grand Jury has returned nearly
five hundred bills OF presentment against
parties not as yet arrested.
SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT George ".
ReeUes, Judge.-Fhe Jury, in the case of
| A, NcLindsay, indictment for larceny,
found the defendant guilty, IS charged,
and fixed the penalty at three years i'm
prisonment in the penitentiagy. Ne
Lindsay was generally believed to have
belonged to the band Of robbers that
committed 20 pSny depredations near
Shelby depot some months since. the
case Of Matthews vs.. McClelland occu-
2ied the attention of the Court on yes
terday. It yiu be taken up again to-
day. It is a cotton case, growing cut of
the late a
Law CoURT-Jdmes O. Pierce, Judge.
! Nc cases have been set for trial to-day.
A calendar will be published for Monday.
To daysunfnished business will be taken
up, and some motions will be heard.
CRIMINAL COURT WnI. Hunter, Judge.
In the case OF the State VI. Marie, the
testimony on behalf Of the defendant
did not close on yesterday. The argu-
ment will commence to-day.
Last evening Judge Hunter heard an
application for habeas corpus in the case
of the State vs.. NJ. Hanley and NJ, Nc
Henry, on charge of burglary. No de-
cision given.