New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-02-12
TRIAL OF THE REV sTEpHENH. TYING. JR.

The trlal or the rev. Stepnen II. Lying Was
resumed yesterday morning per adjournment. Dr.
Beach presided and opened the proceedings with prayer
The President then that the Court would not
receive as evidence the letter Of Dr. Stubs 10 Mr. Tying
prohibiting him from Snf ia, said 70 h1 pev oe n
TinLbs OF New Brunswick was then called, aud exam
eficr TO Mr. lying was elected ia the course
Of the examination. 1t is as follows: 80, ,oc-
,r srurnrsn Tysa-Fsr and Dear Sir: Irn.oa gwen
ne 5 %o9s y ss & ESas D Ss Be Id se5 ros pub
h ts psl; goo Sgn so fs On Sn toua
ss rh Of DE Doeese Be aIAd re I" sy a ~
Yea e SS1 ; SsSr s T d ~ S1 Gs1 service Wei & %
by Ne Cslon lOg win readily eonIl, tn ~ I.gHss
nieh ard promote concord among brethren remain Des ~ V
sleegsy yours W. pr,,v-, HI'T ~ ie 1851
Hereby cer hat by direction Of tls scs Dr Sss' rS Sw oS
s.y :, vs. ,y,sss Is.t EoBKFr HovxL
Jrdse fullerton counsel for the respondent, IN Liz
crossexamnatlon Of Dr. snbbs, called his attention 10
the requiring the minister to make our, 80 iar az
e e f , Of at p 1bbs had not included IN
this lis persons who did not attend bis own Chtst
JaSsh cSgrb ' ne daie Te MeoGs thaTc
cSnilnned Judge Fullerton. not in his cure and i
f F. GG Sf SGr Tq Dr. to Show
e had eeGa se's the OF mSs s " the minister Of
those PARISHES. Mr. Nash, counsel for the prose.
f a8 if bas hero mr Tyns had eacled
Against the express prohibition Of Dr. stnbDs Iq when
S ot vas not Tat lie had ruded into the parish d
New Brunswick. had violated any Injunction OF Dr.
Stubs Dr. Boggs he charge WAS for acting thOut
"exprcss permission" ard not in violation OK any
renOnstIarce. lOi argument here followed evhcen
Ing the Interpretation OF eaOns me eouie, ~. ir,v
defense alien pied TO Introduce yef prominent ecrpy
men as Witnesses 20 testify 70 INC common lTaVuco VI
ignoring tho requirement concerning express peInIs
siOn" The court refused 10 admit this testimony, giving
Cot Nave coire TO the conclusion tia, Ire testimony Il nd
vul. cen could only establish tdr owg nlyiias pItses az,
Sn be Necessary to brng noHber Of eerDnsn 70 esiy
t she'd the general Church nj usage woud he sun
sss the proper interpretation Of ne canoD on ~Hcn ne
The following letters were then offered in evidence and
read when the prosecutors rested TIER case 49,,
avn" NKw-BRrsswcK. July Il, 1851
Ola laws Of he ChHeh which ceearin this city 90
fGuay ast the % RIB sunday eAer trinity ne hev esplsn u
r IN tie Methodist bose worship Known 81 James Curb VITA
co, permission sa seEt eaoIsif,ses .aag "5n oar pas
thereby u and osros y lite ihe g,ge., og ee'rg
tEsrf to TIE penalty ~ uisieeaiof .nr 'non III ilvs ".
ne on i yoa ay su e.l IN the cas- ',u your unea
s az se, l ss' Is @ BsS s f 9 tols 10
" HSase Ss1ier !, W''3 Of e :; S SAs
In Obedience 10 Section Csa6a 2 Tt H. Of the Dst hereby
s VI " E r5 boss: is V n ,aos
vsy contrary the Tu q tie i.oen, Episcopal eaqfeh
colug reasonable ground hr preuuiog y, orreetles
Y.H, 4PDSaEHEH bah0p Of SeN'Js'''y'
The defense then moved to hare the dismissed.
no evidence had been produced to support the charge
ard nv Mr. Tracy for the respondent Mt Tracy argued
that present Court had jurisdiction IN the case as
Inc ocisc II any had been committed, had been COM
mitcd beyond lie llmiis Of this diocese and Canon
forbds the transfer OF trial from one diocese g another
on less charge than that Of CONDUCT disgraeen TO the
holy Office. The Court announced its unanimous de.
cisen against dsm-iug the case The Court then, at
the request OK counsel o. both Sides Adjourned I'LL Friday