New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-08-20
CIVIL

-, Co,pcilmanic case nothing was done,
a., ~ e,cr,T NOT vet having served the Conh'lImen
The Tnicn Pacific Railroad ano 1 dGWu NJ IA
,vier nation were adjourned over 70 ts morning "'io
a..iock when they are 10 have q preference
The following decisions have been rendered
a., ne sInrror Court Special Term, by Garvin J." t'
Isis ID CraInav AIT Gilmore T. Ross ctal In ne ESihtr
Pcomcnthai &c Richard Ten Broeck agt trancls M'g
~ ~ Motions granted. Charles Tucker agt GEORGE IL
Crosswell- Notion granted without costs. HERMAN
Dohren q a. agt H. Colin e. alMoton GRAINED nnless
L,,dgrert he so entered then motion denied IN no
Pairick Mcdonald ia re Julia Leyy.-PusonTIs aus
charged Bernard schae1sr ct al agt' o"1'eS i
nau 81 al-Motion granted ON terms
Tho ,ntertniuahle suit rs to the possession OF
the olympic Theater, entitled Bodies ke,eVer ls"S
made hv the plaintiff 10 rcsote the order au,hoiLlug
the defendant 20 lease the thcater TO ir Hycs l, @
ita tins order did not recte all the papers which were
used on the motion for H. ana lhI so od mat the
order was drawn by himself and that there was u" mv
Of any order 70 show cause iiT lu ds Cor mailing
the order lie had not included an Jus lCCldS a,c
handed TO him nv PLANTERS cohsei some NV o1Iv
queHt 90 the argument because ut{ Ntt9 i"t Ii Ne
before him. Counsel for the paiuth h9d not seen ,ly
rental than that offered by Mr. Hayes lie hno ; tn,
az the property shoud have these PAPERS before H. Al
had Therefore. after notifying ue delcng3,lS i,5o5
i'm tho ,of inc order. The Court refused 10 40 l!9,
and rs the alleged in tie recIas oI tne oUi
IL.
would examine the stcHOgapbers mln1teS D' B,d
Gliding. The following Is the opinion OF JudSe b"in''u
lbs action rd On this the deslant Johu DuT claims
Oympc Tbea, bat tAe ps1ii an'gs lA ne
isc ''f'cuif Y n'
sntc, ti lef audei pending hs apFea re 1
tV purposes Cd" @ ut''f
made Receiver property Tie therefore occ ltsa lo1 O.'
srt nom mere Receiver who does not claim and who h3s "l
Teen sal, TO have any sud Of interest q e property eou 70
clar-e and vlc stakeholder ne ISIS m"'fl we N"'l |
a. continue the ssse Olympic The1ter 10 the present
ksse james r. ay,s lelc) las mana SD Tor sea
hpucft VIII ri r'cp
ey claimed lcei that Mr. Hoyes bas 40 ms own tR
pHse charge upon TOE properly expended Tor Pfma
Improvement 1900 and aud decorations a.out
$500 Eminent mausges Of LcsJca property Ills ety. ncldig
Favetie o1 u $4,000 woad he
oftbe property NJ BIr8uu aul others for the nauit
estimate rental than Sat0o Some unvThed oh aa
hehe Of The plaintiff Mr. Barney "has
that 50O woud be fair rental and an
cane forward the Pautf and offered FZo % be AIrH
COZ have the lease, under such state OF tti''h
BHs consider BIS statements evidence Tor either parry e1 US
gyt or uucre Since this motion arge ana SUD
which nave
efuar question t reached OF tbe argument
therefore he expenditure t Mr. HAYES AM te lcc
position occupied Duf tbe uecesy ~ caring for te eo
property competent hSHs whether The property belongs
M Duf whether Do b. egy trustee and ehTt rejecting 'e
idea The Court should permit mere speculation sncb PelhrPP
theatrical property peug claims d oNntip aud ptoh"H
long LITIGATION those claims dchutey settled and accepting an
gb $1,000 e request Of Le Receiver be granted ~
three at $500 aruun 10 James T.
conformity with TIE terms contained 30 Se
q