The Weekly Perrysburg journal. [volume] (Perrysburg, O. [Ohio]) 1861-1???, 1868-05-29

The next term Of the Court Of Common Pleas
will commence its sessions on Tuesday, June 2,
and continue two weeks, In our last issue we
gave the assignment oi cases Cor each day Of the
first week Of the term. Below We give tho as
seumeni for each day Of the
SECOND WEEK;
SIXTH DAT.
Shoemaker VS.. Pope-CoOk for plaintiff; Price
a Hord, for defendant. '.
Beach vs.. Barnes Hcleubecks, for plaintiff; !.
Dodge & TYLER, for defendant.
Cast vs.. Waggoner- Cook, for plaintiff Dodge
& Tyler, for defendant.
Pratt 4 Hinsdale VS.. Brntley-Dudge & Tyler
for plaintiff, Strain, for defendant
Henry Diehl VS.. Joseph Kieher- HOUenbecks,
for plaintiff; Dodge & TYLER, for defendant.
Beach VS. Newton 4 Son Holeubecks, for PIN
Fay vs. Pratt uiusdale-Cook & Hollenbeeks,
for plaintiff; Dodge Tyler, for defendant
SEVENTH DAY.
Beach vs. Mills Hollcnbecks a. waite, bt
plaintiff; Dodge & Tyler, for defendant
Herman vs., GiuECook, for PLAINTIFF llcrds,
for defendant. r,..,,r
Perison VS.. Bonucll- Hollenoecks, 'or P'alnuui
Uords for defendant. 80.
Cary VS.. Bonnell-houehoecks, lor pialhuu
Hords for defendant. -
Westco,t VS. Bonnell- Hollcnbecks, for prudG;
strong VS.. Bouuell- Hollenbccks, for plaintiff;
Herds for defendant.
Chapin VS.. Bonnell- Hollenbecks, for plaintiff;
Hurds, for defendant,
Jefferson vs.. Bunnel- Holleubeeks, for plaintiff;
H0rds, for defendant.
Larwill VS.. Bonnel Prices, for PLAINTIFF Hords,
/ for defendant.
wagguner VS.. Bouuel 80 Reid, for plaintiff;
| Hnrds, for defendant.
/ Edgar VS. Richardsou-Dudge Tyler, Tor PHI;
| Hollenbecks a. Waite, for defendant.
| In the matter Of Savage, ex parte-Reid
| Waite.
/ Mayer vs. Harkncs- waites, for plaintiff.
/ McGookey ct al. VS.. Union Insurance Company
/ -Waites for plaintiff.
| Beverstock VS.. u. w. II. Day Penfcld for pin.
! Edmonds VS.. Miller Rigby, for plaintiff
Reed VS.. Hackett-P Prices, tor plaintiff.
EIGHTH DAY. .
| Minkler VS.. Lamb Dodge Tyler, for plaintiff )
Green g. Son, for defendant
| johnson vs.. Nhyte-DOdge Tyler, for pl'nttt /;
Eddloman vs. Lisly-D Dodge & Tyler for plaintiff.
Ogle VS.. Clay-Prices, for plaintiff; Dodge y
/ Tyler, for defendant.
Strong VS.. Gould.-Dodge 4 Tyler, for plaintiff.
! Witzler VS.. Turner--Cook for plaintiff; Dodge
& Tller for defendant. ....-...
! Harper VS. Board OF Education- Cook, Dodge 4
Tyler, for plaintiff; Hoenbecks, for defendant.
Trustees Milton Township VS.. Hutchinson ct all
Togds for plaintiff; Dodge TyleI, for defendant.
NINTH DAY. .....-
Leslie VS. ITinkle-Dodge Tyler, for p'antIF;
Cook, tor defendant .I-
.
Woodworth vs.. Cass-Cook, for plaintiff; Dodge
b TYLER; for defendant.
Board of Education vs.. Cass Cook. for plnul
| Dodge Tyler, for defendant.
Carter VS.. Bloom Iiord, Reid, Slevin Brown
for plaintiff Cook, for defendant.
Youugluve ct al. VS.. Knoll llolcnbccks, for
plaintiff; Dodge & Tyler, for defendant.
McCrory VS.. McCrory- Tyler, for Pill.
Cock, for defendant.
Hitchcock VS.. Loomis Cook, for pl'ntifTj llords
for defendant.
Bruncr VS.. Eiwards-Dodge & Tyler, for pf
Hords, for defendant
TENTH DAY.
Williams VS.. Meeker et al--Dodge Tyler, fol
plaintiff; Herds, for defendant.
Jones s.>Leing-Dodge Tyler, for Pain'lll
Cook, for defendant.
Land VS. Braman- Hords, for plaintiff; Cook
for defendant
Finch VS. Ieiling- Dodge & Tyler, for plaintiff
Cook, for defendant.
Haley VS.. Whyte-Dodge & Tyler, for plaintiff
Cook, for defendant
Powers VS.. Pember- Hords, for plaintiff Dodg
, e. Tyler for defendant.
ELEVENTH DAY.
0 Penny VS. Whyte- Dodge Il Tyler, for plaintiff
= Cook. for defendant.
A Gilbert vs. O'Neil-Cook for plaintiff.
Davis vs. shannon Reid, for plaintiff; Dodg
K Tyler, for defendant.
= Dustman VS. Mintnn- Sriple & Canary, for pf
. Koch vs. Turk Hill & Poate, for plaintiff
Dnmon VS.. Ilill-Dudge & Tyler, for plaintiff
Hords for defendant.