New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1868-10-19

burglary and had be submitted in some cases, 10
twelve ignorant. unettered men, who looked INTO the
ask IL would not be OF leas; equally safe to leave tho
question Of intent In the case OF on offending minister TO
Inc II sbyters al the ChurCd called % try him
DF Hare OF Pennsylvania then dre~ attention to the
words Of The resolution prohibiting the clergy man rom
Troubling the PARISH unless ne had express permission
some one tons OF order having arser the Chairman
decided that the amendment was not Ia order while the
report was before the House. The report was then
Thc Rev. Dr. Goodwin. OF Pennsylvania. said no had
found that tins canon WIS section OF general canon
upom the formation OF parishes, but That when the
digest Of the canOns made one portion was pu In
one place and another portion III another place, VIZ:
in Canon V. tit g. He thought that the intent must al,
ways have been meant 20 have weight; tho Church did
not intend to create crime out Of nothing All Oicat-
ing now forbidden, so that II he had broiher,
though Prcsby terrain within the caro- oi another minis
ter lie should be forbidden without sending for the ex
press permission OF that clergyman, to enter into That
parish and marry him and By the same provSoi' u
BISHOP OF inc Church W"h pe ioI 1 10 proo ,e
the bcnodlcOn at meeting OF the Blhe society without
obtaining the express permission OF majority OF tle
the whole difficulty would DO avoided by applying com
mon sense the eucdatOn OF the oanOns. but when we
make them helter-skeer and then leave them To com
mon to interpret them no Thought IL was very
strange way Of proceeding. .
"oihciate" involved difficulty, for If minister came
within the cure OF another, and preached IN school
canon. He did not think that that was the meaning Of
the word. lie thought that If Mr. Stubbs OF NewJerSey.
had gone with Mr.. Tying and heard him preach showing
his consent In that way, no could not have been
yicted Voices Certainly not, certainly mott Ho
Pcnsy lvamia only included what was before ~ the canon
by Implication He moved to lay the whole matter upon
the table. Lost.
Mr. Comstock NJ Y, then offered the following resou-
tun which referred to The Committee on Cihohs:
form congregation. or In any manner disturb lho
parOchd relations Of such clergyman" a.,
Mr. DE ROsse ~ g., then moved to insert hlter mo
word clergyman" IN fourth line section me Words
against the express prohibition OF inc minister Vt "u
Dr. norton Va then moved an addition to canon 70.
sc or g te / 70 fhe effect that clergyman may enter
lpfa
VINO reside there lie said that the Prcsby erans uscu 10
euT,r much from ministers going the parishes of one
an0her ana they passed prohbtory canon which con
tnucs to this day. IL was referred. ,,, .,, ., la
Dr. Pecrkiu Va then offered the followed words 70 Do
inserted IN this canon after the word "olnciate, VIZ
otherwise than transenty" lie thought IL SuauRo
Each of the various amendments offered gave rise to
some discussion but finally they ana tic Orgiha report
sent back 10 the Committee Tor further eonSici"
DR.. Hairnt from tho Committee on Conservation OF
Churches. then brought up the following resolution
The Committee Canaus TO whom refunds Poposd 'snon
g. r,ror, M tie adopt ou Of House oouns Canon:
THF CossYeEafioS ~ cnuHcnEs
The Of church chapel sha not he ued AZ
b to b. cor.1cr,,e stands. free fom
'' N & !" .aS a. m a ha ts secured person
persop, corporation ,uhor eel by The law oftae STATE or Territory
saea aii to bod cry for The doc,e lsh .T co sf,
ergse the sf,resH siloi' TIE osn' 81 the
s. church or ealpe the .ce 81 Ar'sh,
Col .a.I he ",tp in al uahaosel iy. roasol es'
asd ,eal uet :, IeTe,e ct sPo',a o. or me & al % "a,
49,, , be h'' osaol ~ ,i .' Is h 49,,
Judge Battle Of \. &. made some remarks explanatory
OF the report.
At the suggestion OF Judge Ohs Of H. It was read by
sections
t'pon tho reading OF the first section deputy from
put offered the following addition: " Aud It's pew.
aud siiing- under tho control OF the wardens and
N,stry Of such ch lrch or chapel"
Nh Mead Of NJ y and Mr Cross OF Texas then referred
several laws that governed this matter IA Their di
fcrcnt States. -
Judge Atwaer Of MINI. then offered the following
amendment 10 come after the above: Aud uni the ic
of the land which such church d situated 10
vested the parish owning tho same" Othcr amend
rrnts were offered and briefly discussed aud then. on
motion ~ Mr.. Richardson OF VI. the report aud Eho
ur1pu-cd amendments were rCcuunittcd. The COiYcn-
tiOn then adjourned 10 10 q. IN. today.