The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1868-10-17

TO your 4. Idont know Wac accompanied him TO
%y :s Cs ss Mr. the roo" Where ne
the Third district; Mr. Kidd the partner OF PIKE and
Mr.. Pike; remember there were four IN the room.
MEas was Pike's business with you that night
NJ. Mccarthy pressed his question on the Court,
between his client and Nj. Harland il was i'm
possible for counsel for the defence, without some
altitude 70 prove tn that Mr. harand was sestying to
truth THIS fact would not be likely to appear nom
| the direct examination.
Tho Commissioners ruled the time specified as too
remote TO connect It with the before the court
Q. Do you know Joseph r. Bailey Collector CT the
Fourth district, General Hiyer and Sheridan Shook
Q. DO yon not remember that in November last
you and Collector Bailey and Pike had an interview
q. Have you received any checks, or any sum or
sums OF money at any time since you became Deputy
Collector from Sheridan ShoOkS
Objected to. Objection sustained.
p9 Y. when PIKE called upon you at your house IN
with his whisEey 6usinesss ' A. Yes gu = '''
| G What was his communication to you In regard
to his wniskey ousinessf
Objected to. Sustained.
Q. How soon after You saw Pike at your house did
you again see himY A. The next day; saw him at
| Q. Who was present at that second interview :
t cannot say any one was present when MI, PIKE
O. Did not Pike come there specially to see your
A. suppose he came because was to be there.
ment you made with him at your house the night
peloreY A. 1t was; was there to see Mr. Field, and
hoa Mr. ,, P,ke; don't recollect any conversation
him Was at The opera house, as have described.
Y. Did you go there on Pike's invitationY A. No.
Z; DID you have free ticketf
Objected to.
This closed the cross xamination.
Mr.. Bell stated that with regard to the charge OF
Samuel N. Pike against the defendant the govern
ment here closed Its case.
The Case Of Charles Loeb Against NcIIenry.
In the case Of Loeb VS.. McHenry the United States
also prosecuted The first witness called Charles
Loeb, whose testimony in the direct examination
was precisely the same as that given by him In hts
rebutting testimony in the examination Of the Roll
Inns case, in which he contradicted all McHenry's
statements with regard to his having seen spoken
TO Mr.. Rollins In Washington In May 1868, and his
having landed him any papers. checks package or
document OF any kind. The whole OF the rebutting
testimony OF the witness was fully reported In the
HERALD on the occasion OF the previous examination
ana need not be repeated. Nothing affecting his d.
rect testimony or important TO the case was elected
me government then rested the case, with the cx-
ception that 1t desired to put Commissioner Rollins
ON the stand.
Mr.. Bell asked for the committal of the defendant
Mr.. Mccarthy opposed this, insisting that before
the defence could be called upon to proceed with
their case the government, as it had chosen to
combine the two charges must complete the whole
case.
The Commissioner ruled that the government must
complete their case before ne would take Hna action
In the matter. lie would, however, increase the
bail reQu red hitherto OF the defendant in the Pike
case from 900 to s5,0oo the bale in the other case
to stand as 1t was.
The further hearing OF the was then adjourned
to Friday next at ten O'Clock.
COmnliftai ON Charges of Counterfciting.
Joseph Barenbo, an Italian, and John Smith were
brought up by Colonel Wood, Chief OF the Secret
Service Division, on o charge OF carrying on the
business OF dealing In counterfeit money, with in
tent to defraud the government OF the United States
The defendants have for some time been under the
espionage OF The Coones detectives and last night
they sent person to 80 Mulberry street, in which
the defendants carried on their illegal work, with
twenty dollars to purchase some OF the stun. The
party got 500 OF the spurious currency for the
twenty dollars, which he handed over to the detec-
tives. The latter at once made descent on the
place, captured the two defendants and seized $500
worth OF counterfeit fifty cent currency stamps,
and $500 worth in five dollar notes. The parties
were held for trial.