The national Republican. [volume] (Washington City [D.C.]) 1866-1870, 1868-04-13
THE por,nr.-

l. -7hr. r. THE COURTB. .ri,,
ClnegI .QogHr-yudgs wpis.-This court
schuchardt 4 Well. VS.. Joseph Thornton.
~ aefendsnt % Glen, Mills i %, Londoa.
since, SUBJECT TO point OF law reserved by the
court IT. This point grew out 81 the defendant
notarial certificate that the notary had pre-
.ented the bill at the house ofGlon, Mills 800.
TO clerk, who replied, mo account" The
seie wa. that was presented u tSe ossher
teller, or some ofheer Of the bank. The Court
.h 'ss ss ~ md proved w,s ;a'isst
bank, or TO have his agent there ready to pay
the sum for which he had bound himself. The
IN made In s:'s whsTs
though the iodger was total stranger to the
demand good one TS Ssr ooas shsf
fore, sustained the plaintiff, and Mr. Webb
took An appeal to the general term. 49,.
QUESTION or JURISDICTION.
swetland VS.. Caiyer. Motion for Judgment
that the defendant was not a resident OF the
crsSsh So re Ps3ps Ct H. Ae GeIior.r, d.
reeted to Justice Smith 10 send up to the court
the papers In the case, on the motion OF A.
Rask vs.. Ref. Motion for new trial over.
ruled, tho plaintiff having RENTED ga Of the
kvefdict on account OF certain tongues which II
sound. Jones-Oliver.
| COUNTY CASE.
1,es Sosn,x ss tLHy Court e ws.
psny. Order certifying tho case for argument
In the general term.
Andrew Mex emma vs.. WIN. Sprarue, Hine-
Woodward. Action Of assumpsit for work and
labor. Motion to dismiss suit on the ground
the Congress OF the United States, 1p'"
The Court said that the Constitution priv
ileged member Of Congress, not from suit
simple summons. II would be a arrange thing
II a member of Congress could purchase d. OF.
erty in Washington and vet not be sued Tor il
now. Heretofore, when suits were begun by
arrest on capias OF course me mbe RS of Gong, 4,
could not Ne sued during the session; but The
case was different now, when suits arc com.
ruled the motion, and defend,n nj tooI ies ye 10
plead. -
an appeal in Ii 90 o''' ''s"' o'' '''
walter Va. walsh. W. II. Mlller-Merriek.
Motion to strike out Judgment oyerruled,
ma sSa Seai vs. Williams Judgment by default
Northern Central Railroad Comp.nv Va
wilkins ct. al. New trial granted on tbe
tbat sa,e shspgeS tha ;u o, 'n,y Inc coaf,
after the discovery OF Wiikins' defauit tbe
Railroad Company had Continued him in ofi,cc
and made a CONFRONTED with him wIthont
notice to the surety was not sutioient 10 ala.
charge the auretv Tho onurt nnw hn,a ,Sa,
ruling wrong ' ~
Catherine Brown va. the Alexandria and
Washington Railroad COMPANY. Motion ior
The court oSerruied the motion because 4,
| appeared In the papers m Al there h nj hsan y
seryice upon Ike defendsnt Tha 's su ngsn NO
was returned executed upon l. Stonc cierL 81
, j. II. Lathrop, receiver of said road and slso
clerk Of PHELPS & stevens icssees ~ tho ,osS
! | The court said that the reeeiver WAS moi the
| Representative Of the comnanv' hut of The
court The proper method i'm such e.sca wa
10 apply to a court OF equity. which. N il was
proper, would direct the Receiver To defend
mona shonld he served imam the nro .S u.
: director, SC, of the companv' M stone ~ .
7 neither OF these, and As n companv Ind not
been an i'm moneJ of course iudg mani canid : -
be given against ii, NV
| Ellen Harris Va. Baltimorc and Ohio Rail
road COMPANY, 'N ''"'''
, | Motion Tor faf FIR thu Issue NJ ev..u,to, 70
lapoeared IN al an anneaI had heen NJ. ntaJ %
/, the defendants, who within fen days bad nro.
aurod a wifi ~ e,ror and se,vad si,.ttop , ~,
, Harris. but had moi, az Tho ststnte renoi,c al
Jeff /, fine cIerk; aimee n cony ~ tha LIE ~
error for the defendant In erpor TSo rane,
ordered that the 6ai he i.sned a. nr.ra5 ~,
iMronTs WI 10 Wnn,srn Ptrrss ''''
Gessford A Riddle va Eiwsrd noia, Mo-
ti3n ior eeriiora,t upon Justice Clark. Granted.
IN tnis case Sess!ora ana hiadie sued Doian
before Justice smith ior ~, foL work done a.
, se IN W anu ns. I,i u.hlsnea On ouila'
na sayo ,nasmant sor tha ., a n9nG 'he sause
fendant therenpon appealed to the Circuit