The national Republican. [volume] (Washington City [D.C.]) 1866-1870, 1868-02-12

II vanld .pn..r f,o,,, th. foiiouin1 ,ommuni
o.tIo, that W. ,vo,s !, error in re.ne,t 40 the
view. we snte,t.,ned co,eerning sonc of The
fe,,ure, NJ thc ronI,n ors.n,,aton In mi. conn.
trv. Ma heinz . me,nher ~ the ,nst,tr,,o, we
were uaturaIIv mi.lcd 10 .dont the eoncl,.,ona
we announced In onr .rt,c,o in Monaay,s i,.ue
we h,s hoard I, ,oro.toaIr at.,o, a., 80, he
Are hs.rs ~ aen,a, ~ ~. s s.a, sh., ,se r. "a
Vfe hceru any uchlhi u thc ihctt that the re-
mans did els,n that their organization was in
..,s.--.- =, .--. !, ~.
anu henee A'fovernment de Jdefo. It's form oil
orgAatsstaon certainly does give color to this
-, psn,a..n,.ttvs.. a. forms Of ,s.oc,,t,or ~ =,
~ S,,-.,. i, -, =, - s, - 80. 80
They have also issued scrip ia the form Of
honda III VIC have been misled-,s A novv an.
near. we b,ye~it has besn Inv , somewhat vcp-
eral belief In the community which exists in
gard to the nature Of the lFenian Organization,
anu certain style OF noneheiS'urt whleh the
orisinators OF this INSTITUTION nave CHOSEN TO
W." Nv. ... ,r ,.,.,a ,,., Nv. ar. b.,,v =. a,
ahs mater r,sn.; sna We snefe,ore Sheeriuhy
apprehension in the premises
we scarcely need reafnrm. In this eonncction.
our belief that the naturaiized citizen OF the
United States Is entitled to all the rights and
privileges which inhere and belong to the native.
oorn hnesaH, Auu 'nst our o'ernhcn' Is
bound 10 protect everywhere on the lace OF the
well n, tbose of the later All American citi.
w. ~ ss'.s " ny ~. -. 49,, Wv,
n natter NOT whether thew were born on s ths
soil or became American citizens from choice.
ITnon mi. point we tru.t We have meyer besn
SPo" 'hi' Po.n' We ""'' "' "''' "e''' VIC"
misunderstood
wAsHISGros, D. c., February 10, 1865.
AI pEHE sIn; in your issue Of 10th instant read
an eSsSr,a, unasr INC eap n,1 OIL en ,s
IN when you discuss rvs reiatiSRs IN Ms organ;
Britain Its bearings upon the pres diplomatic
controversy between those countries IN reference
the Complication likely to arise therefrom. The
inferential conclusons inevltaple from your as,
sumptions and arguments In that article would
lehd your reaaers, unihiormea on TINS supJeet, 70
opinions unjust and Rrejudiciai TO the thousands
OF good ciuzens IN the United States VINO are
apprehcnd, is very far from your intention or
desire a., you know thst every passt ,s,S 81
protestation assures me that you VIII be glad to
allow me 70 correct your error anu the impress
sions y may have enected-as speak know
myself. . -..,,
You assume " as ~ alieged that the irish
Sepuohe exists IN iuia noh y e
SENATE, &c, anu Is tecognleu such &c JdGi0 ny
the Fenlans. Moreoyer, That /" they Nc re9u lred
70 take an oath OF aiegianee 70 the irish hepuo.
llc and TO De lalthnil anu true nrst and foremost
to that government" From this Il is argued
Ihn ihey hoJurc anu rcIoke ihelr hiIesiahce 70
the United states, as they "cann9t serve two
masters" at the same timei that Great Britain
VIII claim that they are not eltizens In the sense
In When ne United states claims them as s suehi
"a new complication which may embarrass the
most able aud acute diplomatsts on both SIDES
OF thc waser Inc ON you Sssume LOT
apprehenslons, anu l9fep9alhgs VANISH WAN
them; Inc lrish hePuIene does not exist, nor Is
the limits Of the United states, and beyond thai
me niteu States ~ NOT eoneerne ne me fr IS