Ashtabula weekly telegraph. [volume] (Ashtabula, Ohio) 1853-1873, 1868-11-21
c5ussr pRooEEDINGs.
HON. Joseph PEAsE, PRESIDING.

John Judd vs Davis and Benson-ciEil
appeal. This case is continued until next
| term.
James NJ. Mead VS.. A. J. McClinton-c civil
action. On motion of defendant this cause is
continued until next term of court
Trustees of Orwell vs. ]. B. Phillips-civil
action. Dismissed without prejudice.
John Perew VS.. ]. NJ Nettleton-civil ac-
ton. This cause is settled at plaintiffs costs
except $50 of defendants cost
Peter Ohlson ct al VS., Alex. Hoeg-civil ap-
pcals. Continued.
Joel Couch VS.. VIM Patrick-civil action.
The plaintiffs have leave to amend their peti-
ton, and this cause is continued until next
term
Harmon Johnson VS.. Jonah Richardson
civil action. Continued on motion of plain
tiff
All Woodwork vs. Fayett Johnson-civ-
il action Settled-each party paying his own
costs,
Helen II. Hicks VS., Henry Hicks-divorce
Dismissed.
VIM, Story VS.. E, V Kennan, estate-civil
appeal Dismissed, each party to pay his own
costs.
The Grand Jury appeared at the bar of the
court and presented their bill of Indictment as
follows:
Ohio VS.. Chas Hawkins-un1awfully fur
nishing liquor to minor
Ohio VS.. A. Moon-grand larceny.
Ohio VS.. E. L. Jaquays offer
ing to sell patent rights
Ohio VS.. H. G. Sessions-unlawfully offering
to sell patent rights,
OHIO VS.. Eugene Stow-robbery-the want
of sufficient bail, was taken into the care of
sheriff Covell.
Ohio VS.. Curtis B. Lamphear, of Richmond
assault and battery.
Ohio vs.. same-disturbing election.
Ohio VS.. same-resisitng an officer
Action taken by the court next week in the
above Indictments
Ohio VS.. D. Young-shooting with intent to
kill-N1,le PfoseqHi entered on the Indictment
and the defendant discharged
Ohio VS.. JAS Chapin-petti larceny senten-
ced to 90 days imprisonment on bread and wa
VI III SSu'g Jan anu pay lAiS SOSlS vi IIOSGCu-
ton
!: Anderson Beatty VS.. Marquis D. Bacon
civil action. This is the most important case
of this term. In 1865, Mr. Brockway, of
Wayne, sold his farm to Mr.. A Beatty, through
his (Brockway's) brother in. law, Bacon. The
said Bacon executes deed and fixes the con-
sideration sum 2,10O more than was really
paid BrockwayABacon retaining this amount
for his shrewdness OF 'agehcy" A verdict
was rendered IN favor of plaintiff of 2.650,S2.
Mcssrs. Sherman, Lee and Kellogg, attorneys
for plaintiff, Woodbury. and Caldwell for de-
fendant.
Isaac P. Marshall VS.. Melissa Page ct al
civil appeal. on motion 6f plaintiff this cause
was continued.
Jacob L. Eighmy VS.. Nicholas P. Eighmy-
civil action. Continued Entil next term, with
leave to plaintiff to amend petition.
David NJ Strong, D. II. Fargo, w W Castle
Jno Harmon, NJ Nettleton, Perry Parker, Gil
bert Harmon, a D. Strong, A J. Smith, n.
Holmes, VS.. Eliza C. Slzinner-eiYil appeal
Continued.
Collins E. Mann VS.. Austin W. Mann-par-
ttion granted, as set forth, in petition.
Augustus 0. Hoyt VS.. Martha r. Hoyt-di-
vorce-granted for willful absence.
A. II. Slater VS. H. II. Vernon-replcyin.
Dismissed by agreement Of parties.
Grant, Clough and Powers VS.. Enterprise In
surance Co., CT Cincinnati-ciyiI action. Set
tied.
Ann H. Howard VS.. Jas. T. Howari-divOrce
grantcd.-IegOrter -