The daily Gate City. [volume] (Keokuk, Iowa) 1855-1916, 1868-10-10

D0yb0 UxUxVU.
ssass Tn es---e1se&e--s ~
.ss1ss as sPnnADELrna, Oct. 2.
lsAk. 1ss s--Isyssss paDer q laA week
you Or one Of yUur correspondents ~ that
Dr., Drgly \ re ftS 6is1sstor Of the cele>
bfaisd 4PIAlfAzIoH Ansss, asd thst they
us4 ,aAnnfA1anred and sd by sas Pedro
N9tslzs, N ed 0p4niard, in the Island Of
s. Thonss, oyss tosty years: ago, y every
"a - captain ca tsslil5. Nov, sir, can
certify 10 The Ahevs - hsiss true, ior I have
followed the ses Tor otsf forty ysars, most Of
the time doing business With To West In.
dies. These same Bitters, differently put up
ard nansd, wers brosght to my notice on
my 6rst trip 70 - Islaad Of St. Croix for
cargo Of run, md for yeArs and years after
ny ships stbfss wsfs never without them.
always suprlisd my family and many Of
my neishbors With them, and can truly say
better Bittes and Tonic is not made in eli
the world. Yours, truly,
Carr. HEsRY WExTz.
MAosoLIA WArEs, superior to the best
imported German Cologne, and sold q half
ths prics. aass dsodlvdwlt
4 nal1rsaA 0snA sssss ~ Lss County. ).
rs. p Re-. zAbrisli =. Rea<a efsap.--
visers Of Lee County.
US II. mi - w.bber, u. .ame defend.
AAths 2 sA3
Babrs Dsvis, Justiss ef ths Sup. Court U. g., and
Drunmond. Dist. Judgs, oonstitutins the Cir
cult Cart Cf ~ q. - for Northern District
q Isf iois, o. T., lssA
nslsSors ana PlaintffnI in The shove cases,
zAbraki nd Webher, nd heretofore got judg-
meptA q eospeas aAtaehsd 70 r. 4. Bonds,
respsstiysI, shsld - thsda had sued out al
terhsiiyS 1fits Of nandanus, which had been
answered by Defendants, and answers were
quashed; had sued out peremptory writs,
which Defeadants refused to obey and it
now remained with the Court to determine
what action It should take for the disobedi-
ence to its process.
/. Grant, Esq, az attorney for Realtors,
filed motions ID each case, claiming and de-
handing that rule should be served on the
members Of the Board Of Supervisors, to
show Cause Why they should not be arrested
and be brought TO the bsf Of the Court to an.
sHer for contempt and also that the q. s.
Marshal for lows should be appointed Re
ceivsr, to levy and collect the taxes from the
citizens Of bee county, to pay said judgments
The motions were argued before the Cour
| in 44erWSass Tpesday By Grant, attorney
Ifaf kelat>t, and.hi n. Miller, attorney 70,
Hitlad1nts. i 49,
Besides the arGnmsux advanced by defsn.
dant's counsel against the allowance Of eithel
part Of the motions, under any circumstan'
ces, be specially insisted that if the Cour'
felt itself compelled, BY the ruling Of the 81.
preme Court of the United States, to proceed
| By mandamus, that still there were circum
stances connected with the conduct of de
PENDANTS, (the members of the Board of Su
persisors.) which should exempt them from
the annoyance Of arrest and being dragged
to Chicago, to answer for contempt. HI
again, as he had done at the last July tern
ofthe Court. referred the Court to the record
in ths cases, showing that defendants wer'
enjoined from levying tax by the Supreme
Court Of lows, and that il they obeyed th
Court they would disobey the Supreme Cour
Of Iowa, and be arrested by their home ju
dietary.
8 He also insisted thst il the Court woult
grant Realtors any .ss!ief, they should be pu
70 their election, and NOT be allowed both ar
rest and receiver; that in stice could not re-
quire both Of these remedies
After argument the Court took unit
Wednesday morning to consider the matte
and render judgment.
On Wednesday forenoon Judge Davis CAV
the decision of the Court, to the purport tina
Plaintiffs should not have both wsrrant O
arrest and Receiver, but 1t would Civ
Plaintiffs their election, to have either on
or the other, as they might severally choose
Defendants then BY attorney accepted tn
appointment of Receiver, and the Coul
ordered the Marshal of Iowa to be appointed
10 Receiver to assess and collect the taxes
pay said Judgments; and to which ruling q
the appointment Of Recovery defendants b
counsel excepted, and had the exception or
dered to be entered of record. The objet
Of the exception was to save the right to 81
peal to the Supreme Court of the Unite
States, If defendants should desire to 80 dc