The Kenosha telegraph. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1860-1888, 1867-05-23
Circuit Court.

At the regular May Our. VI 'ne Vi
cult Court for Kenosba County, eo1unlencln
on the 9th and closing on the 18th day OF Ma
1867, Hon. VIM. P. Lyon presiding: tn
following proceedings were held.
The following named persons were empaI
elled and swore as Grand Jurors to Wit
George Nixon 5. n. Fox
| Burr Simmons ). ). Derbyshlre
| Philander Judson h b. IoWslee
| Thomas Jordon Henry Rector
B. T. Hatch Joseph Slosson
| L. w. Thayer Peter ii. wood
| L. A. Ravens VIM. B. Slocum
| A. s. Carpenter James M. Kellogg
Joseph V. Quarles.
But one bill of Indictment was found, AM
the grand jury discharged the second day.
| Horace B. Claflin ct al. VS.. Edward A. Hyde
| Assumsit Continued on application ofdef't OF
| payment of SO costs.
f. Robinson VS.. Thos. Cain ct al. Foreclo
sure. Judgment for pPf.
Abner f. Gady VS.. VIM. Brooks Alleged
wrongful conversion of personal property
Pl'ff failed to appear and prosecute, and judg
ment for def for cost.
Chas. Leet VS.. Martin Leet, admir- of War
rem Leet deceased. Continued on application
of defts on payment of $40 costs.
Edgar Pennoyer VS.. n. 4. Allen. Action Il
abate Nuisance. Continued ON application o
deft on payment OF STU costs.
Geo. H. Paul VS.. The city of Kenosha. Thi
action was tried by the court at the last Feb
ruary term. Finding of the court filed at thil
term. Judgment for plf.
John Fechner VS., Anton Weiskopf. Motion
10 dismiss over-ruled, and deft. given 20 days
to answer.
o. b. Matteson vs. Elizabeth Ann Nelson Ell
al. Action to reform deeds. Judgment fol
plf.
The First National Bank VS.. N. A. Brown
ct AL Foreclosure. Judgment at last Febru
airy term. Motion for rehearing granted.
Rous Simmons VS.. Charles Larabee 81 Hen
ry Mitchell. Assumpsit. Judgment for plf
Continued generally by consent of parties
without costs.
Geo. F. Harding VS.. The Kenosha Co. Bank
Demurrer of def to the End amended com
plant of plif over-ruled.
John NJ. Balthis ct al. VS.. P. II. Wood. AS.
sumpsit. Judgment for plffs.
Sylvender Baldwin VS.. Elizabeth A. Bald.
win. Divorce. Judgment for plff.
Henry B. Wa erman VS.. J. H. Kimball. As
sumpsit. Judgment for plff.
Augustus w. Clapp ct al VS.. Nathan B.
Hyde. Assumpsit. Judgment for plff.
Joseph Walter ct al. VS.. P III. Wood. As
sumpsit. Judgment for plff.
Roswell G. Otis, appellant VS.. James Leiber
respondent. Verdict of Jury for def. Judg-
ment for deft. for costs
Joseph b. Howard respondent VS.. The Chi
cago q Milwaukee Rail way Co. appellant
Action for the recovering the value Of sheep
killed by the cars. Jury empanelled and sew
eral witnesses sworn on each side, when plff
discovered that his action was against the
wrong party, and discontinued.
The City Bank of Kenosha VS.. Samuel R.
Mcclellan ct al. Foreclosure. This was a
mortgage, commonly called farm mortgage
given to the Kenosha and Rockford Rail Road
Co. 1t had been once before tried in this court
and judgment for defts rendered, taken by ap-
peal to the supreme court and the Judgment
of this court reversed. By an act of the last
jury is awarded in actions of
foreclosure. This being the first case of the
Kind tried by jury in this circuit, considera-
BILE interest was felt by the bar, not only as to
the mode of procedure, but as to the result
The jury however brought in verdict for the
plff for $3.50 being the amount paid by the
bank for the mortgage with interest from the
time of purchase.
Alfred Willis by Thos Parsons guardian
vs.. s. n. Fox ct al. Action for an accounting
OF administrator and for waste.
Tried at last February term, opinion of
court delivered at this term whereby the case
is dismissed with costs. Plf excerpts and
moves for new trial. which is over ruled
VIM. Crawford VS.. Ross Bell. Action for
personal damages, for assault and battery
Judgment for plff for $4,000.
Peter f. Haber VS.. Thos A Healy. Motion
of deft to DISMISS over ruled and that def have
20 days to answer.
VIM. Haythorn VS.. Martin Burk Continued
generally by consent of parties without COSTS
Michael Griffin appellant vs. j. G. Gottfred-
sen respondent. Continued on application of
def on payment of SO costs.
State of Wisconsin VS.. John Bingen. Indict-
ment for larceny. Plead guilty and sentenced
to three months in Jail.
Waterman VS.. Kimball eft al Motion for
new trial argued and motion granted.
Alex. Beath VS.. Josiah Bond ct al. Jury
waived. After hearing the testimony in this
action on the part of plff, Deft moved to dis
miss, motion over-ruled, and the cause ordered
stricken from the trial calender, on the ground
that no proper notice of tendency ofaction
had been filed.
Lot Quealy VS. Benz F. Gibbs. Foreclosure.
for piff.
Rodney NJ Whipple VS.. Lemir Kellogg ct
al. Foreclosure. Discontinued at cost of
plf,
Josephene Nusch VS.. Jacob Schltz. The mo-
ton of deft to set aside the report of the Re-
feree prevailed, and order referring this case
S. B. Scott ct al vs. John Schmitt ct al
Continued generally till next july term and
that it then be for trial by the court without
further notice.
Green Bay Milwaukee & Chicago R. R. Co.,
VS., John Trumbull Motion for new trial
over-ruled
G. Nelson Deap vs.. Geo s. Taber The tes-
.imony in this action is taken, argument de-
ferred till next July term.