The New York herald., 1867-03-12
SUPREME ccuaT-csaxssas.
interesting Matrimonial RecrimInatiOn
ert ti0n for AIimony.

Interesting Matrimonial ReerinInat tions-,Io-
ost .s tion for AIimony. tx
Before Judge Ingraharn.. Z sGs5c1 10
Asna L. Murphy ss Daniel Aiurphy This case,
which has boen fully reported has progressed
In the HERALD, Is an action for limited divorce the
ground Of alleged cruelty and has been pending in this
court for about two years The defendant formerly
partner in the firm Of Grant, Murphy Co, doing bush
ness In Fulton street, and is reputed TO be worth about
3000O0o short Tins since be left this city and sailed
Tor Fan Francisco but Is at present travelling in Europe
yesterday the case came up before this court
ZION tor amony the plaintiff alleging that she is appre-
hensive that her husband may al some time choose to
withdraw the allowance has hitherto voluntarily made
ana that sne with her family comprising Children
the oldest OF whom Is about years OF age may there
by be rendered utterly destitute. ~ Ri Fl
An afhdavt made by the defendant u California was
read setting forth that he purposes the continuance OF
such PAYMENTS periodically as ne has up to the present
time made for their support that $500 per month is
amply sufficient 10 maintain the plaintiff in position
and comfort superior 10 that she enjoyed before she
became his Wife, that an equal would be ali that
required to deiray the expenses Of maintaining
children, and that he is wiling and able to e ,e this
amount and asks the court grant order whereby
500 900 may be deposited by him for the benefit of his
children, the interest Of winch sum shall be devoted to
mem, and so secured that it snail be applied 10 the
naintenancs of any the chdrcns ma na rela YES;
and adds that all that fond and indugent f her can do
70 TO their happiness and comfort he is will
log tS ,s,io, do !, ~. p.v v,,s.. .,,,.,
pha vas also read stating that upon hearing of tho
dmculty which had arsen between the paries and OF
than usual interest In the matter from the fact that
himself had Joined the parties in the bonds Of matri-
reconcation that he had found Mr.. Murphy willing to
Be restored 10 his wife and home; and that he had
procured an interview between the plaintiff and defend
ant ~ their late residence In phryourth street. which
resulted IN their promising, their knees that they
would henceforth endcavor TO live in felicity and union:
ana that upon rising both parties aeconatey embraced
each other. The leier then went state that In
about two weeks Subsequent to this Iacca,on the old
enedc again burst forth, and that he again from
the breach and having proceeded the house Of tho
plaintiff, he encountered Mrs Corled, sister Of
plaintiff, Mrs. Murphy and with regard TO whose resi-
dence with Mr. Murphy's family thc latter gentleman
seemed much displcased. Mrs. Corheld informed tn,
Clergy man tnat In order effect nytnng like peace.
ful compromise matters must first be arranged salisac
tortiy between hr. Murphy and Mr. White. Tho
rend gentleman effected this latter ation, and
the three then proceeded house IN Thirty fourth
street. but we're informed that Mrs Coraeld suffer-
Ing from headache y and could not be seen. ~
After the pap In the had been read plaintiffs
counsel asked adjournment OF the by the Court
in order 10 put certain letters and telegras form
g adayis Counsel for the defendant also requested
that the case be postponed for mouth In order allow
thom 10 communicate with MIR Murphy. in Europe, IN
reference 70 the adavits 70 be submitted by the other
de. The case then set down for the l1th day OF
April next gi4 assa aesa a5@s ~N n@gsr 81
The Question Of tho Liability to Taxation of
United STATES Certificates of Indebtedness.
The People, rel the ST Nicholas and Other National
Bsaks, the Comptroller, fc-The question issue in
these cases. whether United States certificates Of
sndebtedness liable 10 taxation as United states &C.
surites and in which tie relators sock by mandamus
compel the delivery Of city bouds to refund the axe
paid on the certificates was 70 have been argued before
this court yesterday.
Mr. Justice Ingraham, by arrangement with Richard
Riggs and Judge Alien for the relations yesterday gave
judgment pro rna in favor Of the ciy TO enable the
en- hearing In the Court Of Appeals during s
ons in this city during the present month and In April