The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-10-31
LEGAL INTELLIGENC CE.

COURT OF QUARTER sEssIoNs-Judee Ludlow.
In the case of the d S VS. q d M az MyeT s
factor law before reported the jury acquitted on the
Charles Way was acquitted of charge Of malicious
mischief in inJuring carriage belonging TO Joseph
faslened p IN @ ditch I az MaHay4nf in froat Of Ways
Went out to aid the driver and just as ne and the
driver had succeed in loosenlng IT, and were pushing
struck the cart and was broken. This was plainly an
Fdwasd BuOkner was convicted of a charge OF the
larceny of watch valued at go, belonging to John
down under a tree, at strawberry festival in the
ecIoIa eUTptbyI, hyIs, Watch Vat from his pocket
He had prevs usiy during the day noticed the de-
reason com planned at the Detectves' office. Mr.. Hen
derson Immediately issued circulars containing de-
scription of the defendant among number OF pawn
offices, and afterwards the defendant oileIeo the
watch in pledge at one of these ohces' ana was ar
Jean Baptiste Dnvan was convicted of charge OF
al SS4, belonging TO Adolph Requier The detendant
boarded in Sixth street, below Spruce and was ar
rested with them on his person as ne was @ % LIS
way down Walnut street for the next new YORK
Bernard Bradley was convicted Of charge Of
afternoon. september Tor oelng nruRki anu 1yS was
station but he created such disturbance there that
E taen oteS 10 anotner cell and lett alone; but there
began crying murder loudly that the whole neigh;
HIM INTO hs he a9a eS fhe tine asTy new
at a6RIlEE'RISF RlEi' sIg Soi coR Judge Hare t1dwin A.
| Tb1naas VS. French d Richards An action TO re-
oveT for breach contract in falling TO deliver six
dTnms OF caustic soda bought by the plalnts OF de-
PENDANTS. The defense alleged delivery Neruct Iof
plMShTBn plMS AZ 6ouSiass vs. Horace Wilson. An action
tor breach of contract In refusing 70 give lease Tor
| In''onnises as mad been agreed to. On trial.
| y nTSTRICT. COURT Judge BbarsWood - josiah
1dberfs VS., Davis q Johnson, An action on prOmls
Iy note given for mules. The defense alleged that
s6 mules were purchased and the note given under
susIantee of the soundness OF the mules, and that
guy shortly afterwards died of disease they had
| ,rhsn sold, Verdict for plaintiff, $500 g..
Henry BuIchell VS. Hugh McAnany ana ONO rice
| and The Union Passenger Railway Company, An
scIon 10 recover dan ages for injury sustained nom
the death of plaintiffs son, minor, through the
alleged negligence OF defendants. In Jupe 1866 the
| defendants McAnany and Tee, had charge OF the
erection of building in Seventh street. below south,
| bricks, stone, etc, there One pile Cf bricks was
placed so close TO the railway track tina there was
left Of only four inches between II and pass
On The 9TH of June Francis Burchell, the plaintiffs
son. and hiteen years OF was allowed to SIT
line. cars. II o leaning from the platform looking
up Seventh sTeetand when the caT.reached the brick
nile his back struck the latter aud he was drawn In
| between it and the He was so severely injured
| that he died very soon afterwards On trial.
| COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-Judge Peirce.-
In the of q. n Choenhent VS. Freak, heretotort
| reported. the jury rendered verdict Tor plaihun
james II erst vs., Adam Herbert, an act Of trover
| verdict for plainliM - .
| UNITED STATES CIRCUIT CoURr-Judges Grie
| and CadWalader.-The case OF the American WOOt
Pulp Company vs. j. ID. Hen, et al before reported
| Is Btl under consideration