The Valley Virginian. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1865-1895, 1867-08-07
NEW ADVERTISEMENTS.

Virginia sat uales held in the Clerks Office
Of the Counl5 Court Of Augusta county,
on Monday the 9Th day Of August, 1867, (being
the first Monday in the month";
J. NJ. Trevey, Plaintiff,
Against
John B. Bell, Defendant
In Assumpsit and upon attachment
The object of this suit is to recover against the
defendant damages which are laid in the dcclama-
ton at two hundred and fifty dollars, the amount
claimed being for money paid by the plaintiff as
security for the defendant ON judgment obtained
in said Court, in the name of Albert r. Whitmore
against said j. B. Bell and ]. NJ Trcvey, to wit
the sum of $780, Al with legafintcrest on $lOl,0 5
part thereof from the 18th day of May 1866
The attachment against the Estate Of the defen-
dant sued out in this cause, being levied by the
service of copies thereof on David Jones, Silas
Jones and Elisha J. Bell persons in possession Of
effects of the said defendant, and the defendant
not having been served with a summons In this
suit or with the attachment, and it appearing by
an affidavit in this cause, that the defendant is not
a resident of this Commonwealth. On the plain
tiffs motion, it is ordered that the defendant do
appear here within one month after due Publica-
ton Of this order and do what is necessary to pro-
tect his interests, and that copy of the same be
posted at the front door Of the Court-House of
this county on the first day of the next County
Court. A copy-Teste,
VIM. A. BURNETT, Clerk
Christian & Harrison, p. q. august 7-4w
Virginia: -At rules held in the Clerks Of
Y fee of the County Court of Augusta
county, on Monday the 9Th day of August, 1867,
(beng the first Monday in the month.
Reuben Whitmore, Plaintiff,
Against
John W, Picker, Defendant.
In Covenant and upon an Attachment.
The object of this suit is to recover against the
defendant damages which are laid in the declara-
ton ut two hundred and fifty dollars, upon sim
gle Bill for $l25,O0 with interest from the 10Th
day of May 1866, till paid-subject to credit of
$25, 90 as Of the 18th day of October, 1866.
The attachment against the Estate of the de-
PENDANT, sued out in this cause being returned
levied on one Threshing Machine on 22d Of May,
1867, at o'clock p. m. and the defendant not
having been served with summons in this suit
or with the attachment, and it appearing by an af-
6davit in this cause, that the defendant is not an
inhabitant of this State. On the plaintiffs mo-
ton: It is ordered that the defendant do appear
here within one month after due Publication of
this order and do what is necessary to protect his
interests, and that copy of this order be posted
at the front door of the courthouse of this coun-
ty, on the first day of the next county court.
A copy-Teste,
VIII A. BURNETT, Clerk
Christian & Harrison, p. q. aug 7-4w
Virginia Sat rules held in the Clerks Of
flee of the Circuit Court for Augusta
county, the 9Th day of August 1867.
Alexander H. H. Stuart, Plaintiff,
Against
Henry O. Cease, Defendant.
IN CUANCERY.
The object Of this suit is to obtain a decree to
sell certain house and lot in Staunton, sold by
the Plaintiff to the Defendant, and apply 50 much
of the proceeds as may be necessary to the pay
mont Of the balance of the purchase money due
thereon.
The Defendant Henry O. Cease not having en-
tered his appearance, and it appearing from sat
sfactory evidence that he is not resident of this
Commonwealth: It is ordered that he appears
here within one month after due publication Of
this notice, and do what is necessary to protect
his interest. A copy-Teste,
JOHN PARIS, D. c.
Stuart, p. q. august law