The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1867-11-22

ioD. viz "Dus no pan Of said shall b expsndsd u
P.s%sos = SSa's A. IN :. % e s
Ssd been essaosd u senis.snon d eh.os. s1s g Is
o. The e.sss n dsia ss ws q an re Prosisns
i..s saoISs % Guide % ssc ss The
and as
the restriction mot wholly iaysd By reason q this
sssSs:r IS Lss: A .bsss @sA
case. y: ssasss iS: and 10
Sections The said ssvsr.l sums shall be applied only 70
and pnsSss . ald s
par Or h. liability
Of the objects and purposes speciaed 70 an amount be-
y: q New hereby siS s.Iss., T r.
sssrs! Of se Soss sW nov Um IL once az
The said shah be applied only 70 the
psisd: and neither said oorDoTs,oa any bosrd de-
sns o.
thorize directly Or indirectly exOenditurs or expend
s
Or FOR oe or oDsss than S so
SIC 70 The Mayor Aldermen .ndo mmon.ly Of the city
expenditures authorized liability By any board.
dsF y %
board department odcsr Of said corpora
beyond seA specific
irac. shall snie Cd BY dsfs or otherwise Any court
against said corporation excsptoon proofs ia open court
sss %
ss sss ss.'
D.rmsat Hoard member, ncsT sgsa, thereof under
b,ss together With Tho cai ssa apoa sh. exceed The
appropriated BY this act for the in and about
rendered in the plaintiffs favor 10 sach action
int o u % IL M ~ s .
70 the person which the act Of 1851 referred 70 can
IL tho sch DUE nsrsano annessd 'rt.d schedule
N @ sss sss s x.
Of charter Which bscams lay on that Day can
OILY
ipisSsed By the city the only osieson to was
paInn had contributed hs ssicss goods had been
or q b. hs
1 o. N Ss 81 y Is *. M n s ns s
claimed On Notion % the part g the pain for jads
provs in open court that hs amount sought
IN the ment remained unexpen cd h, City treasury
ss sued FOR
ton " sal. @ na . es hearing
Court regarding the said requirement unconstutIona
&.
the Question: e.:
opinion OF the supreme Court the OF The Tribune Az
ss " NEE s' 90 s ss r
"a: w In The
%ca gA ss e ns s ssS'n .sa ass i:
% osr % assA.4 Il "s 81 them q
law Of referred TO- or whsthsr the
. settle y: Su.s,on whether .ay error he:
ate attention o. the court statutes qusstion. and
.snss S s" nds 70 such
sus
ton o. chapter SIG laws Of 1870 or any other law Judges
Common f,sss dnss ne subject II. decision Of :
i'm air or affect any for ADVERTISING required under
sss
. :ss &C. md q .A'si
closing this sor to my q is
me Es: ton Isss and iss! mu"icips ~
9.a have s S,n y ' ,v Ysss
no, pay M @ debt; vhs m, S n y.
{:
habit .avl:as ,ssir si!:si: s.s Sssass Win
best ds,ory and e ssy e need tho o0mpus0nof
n..a. az : s sso. q l
Esans "a s';sfs ( d sSs
e. z r. sss IL
& "a Ss sJpP e 70 meet s4 s %
Tat .bs good. were delivered a. claimed with
s Money 81 s
:sss .sd r sfG S.. s. s~: r.
action for goods sold and delivered that the debtor has no
o1 II sp ps the ss sss
boen brought IN the Superior cosr Judgment ordered In
Here again he Z met By another dnoulty socord
soapd eonaon osns
10 prove n open cour: That the amount sought 70
the city treasury = he credit o. The approximation the
fesSaed This q csarss 10 caaSo. do and this demand
OeIns nude. q him BY the Corporation Counsel. e
"a S isf ss'rss
sssa As rs%H ssss ss s
q h n s s s a &:
crsaltcr perhaps indulge the hope that all doaly i
The court adjudssd that the money due The L.rs-
Psga. trouble. pot yet snasi lbs Iesi.laurs o.
% .as ~ paaS o Ii. Ss,1 per:
judgments. sh II Be sspenisd N payment. ootals ed
~ .ss laws oa % pn chapter So @
S %a , Ssa asr Aa s on sGS ss sss %
.Is adsmcns sss my snmer doe: NJ. seem 2 yoS
beat IL this just by this gcntlemsns Ills goods fur
nshed 70 the corpraon the debt due ths debtor has
money IN his 70 pay is aud yet y sun
me s. sss' mo;
condition q affair. having sssn o,ousa. .boa. By
cunbreus ana machine order remedy the
cont usson and injustice L has itself produced.
by ecuon chapter 5s6 laws OF 1861 John III. Martin
dale, ckauncey ~ bepcw. Lewis B. woodruff and Benja-
n. Bpnney together with the Comptroller e.
tued Bsard Of Audit % adjus. and see claims against
tho city heir duty Will probably be 10 examine just
such claims :. that Of Mr. sewsrt and e provide psynen.
Court o. Record the hghest firm o. evidences Of debt
heretofore Known 10 the law be subject
incd ny Board Of Audit And although funds In tho
treasury whcresth 10 ply IT. another fund 70 b. rails
Cd for the purpose by The Of honda cannot
fancy NOR lrmsntAoc OF Legislative folly.
The VI the Tribune Association against the Mayor.
above referred which the supreme Cour denied the
rgrt OF the plaintiff 70 recover judgment because OF tho
fsvrc Of plaintiff :, owe IN open curt that there wsre
funds In tie treasury wherswfth 70 pay IT, decision
whch NJ nf,. sight seemed severe and unjust 70 the
Of the law u tbs ssr o. rrck.sss ynorsn Legislation.
expenditure might be ncned overlook come Of is
f0sirt But u " utterly useles< In that regard
II n srely lmpedes the honest creditor IN the col
cctioa'uf his just claims rhs amount II always pretty
uur be r md