The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-11-01

/ minority OF the. Directors 1 vould have been
70 'E sSs S0 aoy % cSggGs o Ss "a Sse
ants would :, baye been but fearing shat
aGP o % met %SvSs meet s % 70 hS %s
favor TO w. H Allen, they have resolved TO act as
restrained will introduce Mr.. Allen President ao
SSve applied 10 the Court for feefif the defendants
had suspended their aetion; but am obliged 70 do
30 By their indecOrous conduct, as hum6ly submit
* The onice Of the President Of Glrard College is
that of the CHIEF Instructor in said Institution. Upon
him the duty cast OF nsting into the minds OF the
teacbine them to have a pure attaohment TO the
sacred rights Of conscience and OF foster ing in them
things Mr. Grard solemnly egJoins He is TO be, while
Ing az the will and ieasure Of DiFectors Is Wholly
inconsistent with the chars cter Of said office.
Esq the Of the @ drectoTs he was Very
had been opened BY The other side, for be had hoped
and expected that the only matter before the Court
tlon In the case But the pursued By the other
side would force him to read Rflidavs ofan unplea
Mr. Sellers replied that he desired that they should
The aiHdavits oftbe Directors, who are defendants
In the case, the substance of which has been hereto
fore made public. and which deny certain speoifca-
tions In the compainanps BILL wee then read to the
Then the following affidavit Of Mr.. Allen was read:
william H. Allen. President elect of Glrard College
case, being duly affirmed according to law doth
Directors Of said College elected him President OF said
institution which office he accepted, and which Office
That sometime in the year 1851 the Board of Dlrec-
consent reduced his salary President OF said nsti
tuition TO so low point that after about years
ciept % to IN meet the current expenses Of his family
years thac he was Presdsnt Of said instt1tIon. he
neither attended the regular or special meetings of
elally invited do the purpose Of giving In.
% %otmaat9n a upon some question under consideration
The Afirmant further says that the statements con-
70 VII That the said Wiulam H. Allen, prior to said
A. d. 1851 had called Upon number ofthe BfeetoTs
urging them thereto Ghat is urging them to create
ms election Chat ls seeking the election Of your
RthrmanD 10 the Presidency OF said Institution, is
18th, The ailiT%snt further says that about the
OF mail from II. W, Arey, ESQ Secretary of Glrard
SSlege, communication of which the following is
GfRARp COLLEGE, Sept. 70, lss7--w. H Allen, ESQ.
meeting of the Board of Directors OF Girard College
that Ssuo to take eecs on the @ Of NSvembs22t or
,ut., Respectfully yours, 49, -
o.,....u.o,,,,,. Secretary Girard College
the Board of Directors OF said College, and Informed
the Board OF his acceptance and that he perfected
family to this city and he is now prepared to enter
So WILLIAM H. ALLEN
prime prneiPaly M upon the point thSt remQyol from the
Without giving the Incumbent opportunity to be heard
in his own behalf wishOut making any charges of
showing just cause whatever for their action was
Illegal and could not be sustained, and he held that
this case was such,
Mr.. Lynd followed argument want of Jurisdiction
in the Court over the case.
III der argument.
COURT OF QUARTER sEssIoNs-JudSe Lud-
low,-Riohard A. Naugan was acquitted of a charge
of assault and battery
Thomas Dougherty was acquitted of a charge flar-
ceny, but was held in $2OO bail to keep TO peace and
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-Judge Prlrce.-
Philip Griffith VS.. John Wildey. An action for work
ana labor DONE Verdict for plaintiff, S3i'SO.
Joshua Day Lee IL Miller An action to recover
wages. Verdict for defendant.
DISTRICT COURT-Judge Sharswood-Burchell
wy Company. Before reported. Verdict tor plain
tiff, as to the Railway Company, only $3.50.
Albert Smith VS.. Benjamin Sharp, Elisha Roberts,
and Israel II. Johnson, Executors of John Sharp,
deceased An action for medical services rendered
during long continuance of "A disease of the bladder
Joseph Way and Enaley d. Way his wife, in right Of
said Emley VS.. Thomas MeOr g Goa feigned
issue. Verdict for plaintiff.
DISTRICT C0URT-Judge Hare.-John B. Dou-
for alleged breach of contract refusing TO exuCiite
lease The defense alleged that the lease was re-
pehtedly rendered the plaintiff in due FORM and WAS
by him refused: Verdict for plaintiff six cents
Rlchardson q RObbons vs. Aldrick Yerkes &
Carey, An action on a book account. -
Thomas Vs. French d Richards. Before reported
Verdict for plaintiff, 1902,
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT-Judpes Grier
and CadwalRder.-The case of the American Wood
Pulp Company vs. j, D. Heft ct al, in which is in
under boiler pressure in the manufacture OF PAPER
from wood and straw pulp, and in which the origin of
bhe process is undergoing Investigation,
ported Is still under argument