The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1867-02-22
ON Tuesday, the 5th

Day of March, 1867, at 10 o'clock, A NJ,
the following Property, viz
3 Work Horses, Brood Mare, fine blood
and in foal by Henry Magraw's Horse, i
Yoke of Oxen, 3 Mich Cows, lot Of
Young Caule,.l lot of Shoats, 2 Sows
and Pigs, l lot of Sheep, Family Car
riage, 2 Ok Carts, l Mower, nearly new,
| Patent Steel-tooth Horse Rake, Corn
Shelter, l Montgomery Wheat Fan, with
double set of Riddles and Screens, Flows,
Shovel Flows, Cultivators. Harrows,
Wheat Cradles, Rakes, Forks, Shovels,
Spades, Hoes, Harness, together with al
most every other article of husbandry usu-
ally found on an. extensive and well regu-
lated farm.
TERMS OF SALE-.-All sums of $40
and under, cash on the day Of sale; on
all Sums over that amount credit of 6
months will be given, the purchaser CIV
ing his note, bearingjnterest from the day
of sale, with approved security.
GEORGE STEPHENSON.
VIM. S. Bowman, Auctioneer.
PETER W. DECKMAN In the Circuit Court
VS. for llarforacounty, as
LYDIA DEoKMAN. Court of Equity.
THE object of this suit is TO procure a
l. decree divorcing the complainant from
the defendant, uinculo matrimonii.
The bill states that the complainant
and defendant were married about the
year 1913, and that they lived together as
man and wife from that time up to the
breaking out OF the war between the
North and the South, when the complain
ant volunteered as soldier inthe Federale
army. That Oh his return home, alter
the close Of the war, in April. 1865, Or
the early part of May of said year, that the
SAID Lydia appeared TO have become entirely
es;ranged from him, and that she aban-
doned the complainant early in July, 1865,
and that she has ever since been uninter-
ruptedly absent. That she left the said
complainant without any just cause or
provocation, and that the separation be-
tween the complainant and defendant is
final and beyond all reasonable expectation
of reconciliation.
The bill then prays for the passage of
decree divorcing the complainant from the
defendant, riaculO matrint0nii, and for
a subpoena against the said defendant,
commanding her to appear in this Court,
and show cause, if any she has, why a
decree should not pass as prayed. The bill
then further prays for all order of publ
cation against the said defendant, making
known to her the substance and object of
the bill, and warning her to appear in the
Circuit Court for Hartford county as
Court of Equity, on some certain day, to
answer the premises and show cause, if
any she has, why decree ought Aot to
pass as prayed, and on her failure so to
appear, that then the bill be taken pro con-
feSSo against her.
1t is thereupon, This 2Sth day of Janu-
airy, 1867, adjudged aud ordered, that the
complainant, by causing copy of this
order to be inserted in some newspaper
printed and published in Hartford county,
once week in each of four successive
weeks three months before the 10th day
OF June next, give notice to the said de-
PENDANT of The object and substance of this
bill, and warn her TO appear in this Court,
in person or by some solicitor thereof, on
or before the said 10Th day of June next,
and show cause, if any she has, why a
decree ought not to pass as prayed, and
in default thereof said bill shall be taken
pro confesso against her.
VIM, II. DALLAM, Clerk.
True Copy. Test, ~
febl ,g VIM. HI. DALLAM, Clerk.