New-York tribune., 1867-09-02

|
o,ly change which Congress was willing to orecoghize III
fLn, ,Aicsl business. provides; -,
ci1ois. so oTgIs ISe Paeilh Circuit g4 stat $40
- X thus made apparent, not On " ealel ~ Du az nt
iudh ldual III, nbcrs ana aino.t OF tc s ,,td
that whatSef under the Constitution OF the ohtea zen
districts and circuits they stand III the statute pooh
intended to be, and must DC dCcheu "a t anu
fore But have that tract OF country composed
OF states parts OF states, once brought nhder tne
tionary violence be deprived OF or exoneated from A.
Violence is the only reoosnzed excoPon ana tat n ~
while the violence lasts and then a. al gawfn deroga
judicial power Intact in the District of North Carolina
Though the subject matters Of its authority are limited
to q category. it is certain that upon those
states for that district are the snprem
II must be beyond dispute If the authorities and the
statutes which have been introduced are accepted,
and thS right Of being tried in them for Violations Of
the criminal code of the United states and and OF OF
every form, part Of the rights to be protected
and the duties IT, s., 70 be p the In resp
the of Gen Sckes reaches the full stature OF per
version OF authority which II persisted @ in must Us ne
against the United States. an undertaking which
beTSe MSIa "o nt6Son o Of an officer RonornSiy s
guished for bis gaantry in defense OF the Constitution
10 ursdctioni Certainly in this, in any other mat
ter there may have been doubt But II would insult
structon District inquire whether not he supposed
himself authorized by law to forbid the Supreme Court of
the United States from hearing causes affecting persons
inhabtng the States Of North und South Carolina with
out his consent. Naturally no person could hesitate
er it was not his duty to coerce the court r,
BY Il to bS ssTaS saaa iSs it G eand nU %f RnTs
in the contemplation OF Gen Sickes. when Issuing
Of the Supreme Bench Yet itis equally certain that
he had been disposed to ascertain his authority through
on adjudication by competent Court, decision might
hav
ant could have raised the question OF jurisdiction IN
ADVERSE any 70 'ls the q" power owe Of Cen sce
appeared easy to procure hna ana coc,sve OF n,ror
II that officer had doubt on this subject then ne must
have known the lawful course for Its solution Whore
difference arises between military agent ana Court as
10 the Jurisdiction OF the latter and the former reses
to decide for himself In his own favor the act can bear
he did so only TO inferior Court and not to the su
prefes s oc mo@eS Tcon must show
that the interference which is under consideration
Tni yudicary. ii ine1dinS the supreme Court Of
the United States as whole, and the force which;
Sganst the process of the Circuit Court cannot think
be distinguished in law from similar threat rJdely dl-
ton The process which IN Marshal GOod0e's hands,
and indeed for aught that appears here may have been
Court reminding cause with directions for further pro
ceedng IN conformity TO the decision OF that court
the whole. proceedings, and the Court itselI' I'
Morecvsf II final process may be controlled by se order
in question so may process anyi step in tiga-
on for the order expressly commands that certain suits
be STAYED and that like suits not yet initiated shall not
be instituted II the nererence OF process which Is
now in hand could be Justified coud an enccual inter
ference any stage and in any case at his pleasure III
the Carolina districts, be made by Cen sckes'
This potentially, Is Custing the jurisdiction tho
supreme Court itself abolIshing the federal
district in vital particular from the national body
pnbs poS ana an al ~ eSoTcs biz TO the
United States except by force Of arms The virtues OF 40
may he permitted 10 authorize hn TO aspire to So
dangerous an Independence Of his felowcitzcnS so.
there had been doubt whether the powers OF me United
the proper way to solve II the very thing which
would be totally excluded by the violent action which has
The Acting Attorney General then reviews the acts Of
Congress show that they give the mitary no AUTHORITY
TO interfere with the Courts in the Rebel States ana mus
These laws are in force II the President could be sup
posed to be willing suspend them il certain that he
has not the power lie must however, execute the laws
What then shall be done with these shall consider.
before concluding the peculiar energy with which tne
Executive Department Is bound 10 act where ihe pre-
suited The execution Of the criminal laws Of the United
States and especially all such az are mIehued 10 s"u
Judicial authority belongs under the President To tne
supervision OF the Attorney IL happens thhs
to devove upon this office to reflect tho indig,
nation which the law encourages III INC lu1iclhl
breast against nsubOdinaton which, when IL refuses
reverence, destroys power unless the deprtineh. 10
for decentralization of the constitutional ministers OF
1t not without ddence ,9St tne tabUg Do me
legal responsibility herein Of tho President OF te e
Whatever
that II shall be executed. II is tus with the Revenue
laws. the Postal laws the Criminal laws, ana tc mitr9
which the present Executive feels bound to carry
into effect in their intent and meaning ascertaned
upon those principles Of interpreisti9n WHICH, ife mem
selves taciiy substantive part OF all statutes Whas
ever But all the laws Of any country must be presnmc
they appear 10 conflict with each other the reconciliation
OF them judicial work IT, under the conditions 81 te
capable OF judicial action III not
still the conflicting laws mnst be execntcds0 iey must
be recOncied and consequently, In such casethos WHO
musf
II tine Constitution be one oil the laws III ' %
pf stronger application (ChiefJustice Marshal l
Cranch IT, 1881 For the purpose Of TINS eAecuo ho Io
laws however there must he an Executive power Ih'S
power must vested else te country has no Schsl
tuition. may I've vested as the judicial power uu our
Government Is, in several persons Oi W %
in countries In large asseibi oI II may ~ -
in single Individual wherever IL Is yesied' 'neIe - @ se
corresponding responsibility the courts Ol Jus.Ge "o
: to be protected from degradation, u can Only ~
through the executive power OF tne o'te' ~ ci, az
not he by the aw-lnaking poNcI, "a 80, g d.
laws Intellectual without cNecuiloh ana lhat j, i
possible against Iessate miSo i which consid
then Is case for Executive lhteINohtloi', M & ti.
ering the tanscendant value OF an independent udcay
il OF the utmost sanCtity OF obligation unless IL Sihi a
pear that the hdepeh9tnce Vi Lno -, II Iv q, yccn
lacked but only that the execution OF lW, ny h Gu
Judciary The latter would TO be the view of the
officer charged with the execution OF the Reconstruction O
Jurisdiction IL judicial question, ana one Which
The judiciary has this instance decided and decided
the case would resolve itself into case OF collision ne
tween the Executive and the Judicial Gal. DopafIs rny
tonary relation between them. But mas that rcvoiu
tionary relation ariscnl think not II the EXecntlNc
Of the United States resists the Judicial power
the United States there Is, indeed such reia'o, @
the Constitution OF the United states pioViaes wa
"Tbe Executive power shall be vested IN "a
presi,lent of tbe United States Of America" Art
H. See ~ All process OF the Federal courts Courts
run i'm the name Of the President OF The Unted sintes
hecause be court call him 10 acllOh a.
they do all submission and ne must exeenre r nt ,be m
laws OF the highest sancy, by the whole power oi ap
nation n Is your Excclency IN state Ol cor
son with the national judiciary H0' no ve eGS Sy tbe
whole executive power thus vested III you ~ tio @
organic law and can be diyested by hothing
= Int Inv un.lnH AOlI