Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1867-04-12

resolutions, his manner betraying the
pleased surprise, and the deep ems Of
qualification with which sceh outspoken
and hearty commendatien had affected
him, in a few feeling, kindly simple
and deprecatOry words, expressed ms
thanks to the two juries for their fstter-
ing, and perhaps ill-dessrved express
s;ons Of commendation, and his sincere
appreciation of the value Of their senti-
ments as expressed in the resolutions,
coming as they did from gentlemen Of
the highest and most honorable standing
in the district and the community, and
remarking that In consideration OF all
the various circumstances connected
with the occasion, he considered 1t as one
Of the proudest moments, and OF the
brightest days Of his judicial career.
The courts will adjourn to-day to the
next term in course, as the April term at
Nashville commences on Monday next.
While it is to be regretted that the
term, compared with the immense
amount Of business pending in these
courts, has been 80 short, yet attorneys
and clients may well congratulate them
selYss that everything has been done
that could be done to facilitate business,
a large amount of which has been trans
acted during the term.
UNITED STATE GRKND JrRY ROOM,
MEMPHIS, n April II, 1907.
At an adjourned meeting Of this body,
Mr.. J. J. Worsham being called to the
chair, and Mr.. III. A. Psrtee appointed
secretary, the following resolutions were
unanimously adopted
RESOLVED, 6y the members Of the Grand
,J,trB, That the thanks Of the individual
members of this body are due and
hereby rendered to Mr.. G. B. Church,
foreman, and Mr.. Nat. Hoffheimer,
secretary, for the courteous aud gentle
manly manner in which they nave full
filed their arduous duties during the
present session, hoping their future lives
NAV be as bright as their smiles and
good nature toward US have been during
the long session now closing.
ResolUed, That a copy of the above
resolutions be furnished, each to Mr.. c.
b. Church and Mr.. N. Hoff heimler.
II, A. Partee, Secretary; J. J. Worshan, Chair
man ]. d. Danbury, Geo. a. b1ood, a.
Norton, r. NJ. Mason, ". W. Jones, Martin
T.. Ryder, q. 6. Merrimant ISAAC Rosser,
Michael Mulhoilaud, W. Underwood, VIM.
Chase. Isaac c. Reavis, F. NJ. Moore, Il. D
MEMPHIS, TENN, April II, 1851.
Resolped bu the Grand Jurors for
United States District Jour Of West
tennessee. uOU an session at Memphis,
nN--a L., lad lnfa ara dina 10
his honor, @. +. Trigg, judge presiding,
and the officers of this court for their
respectful and courteous treatment dur
ing our sitting as grand jurors at this
term.
c. b. Church, foreman grand jury U. 5. Court,
District West Tenn. N. Hoffheimer, seere-
tary, and the sixteen other jurors
WE CALL attention to the card of
Messrs. Selden, Williams & Co., dealers
in lumber, IVA Madison street. Mer-
chants and coEtractors will fRd it to
their interest to give them a call. They
keep on hand lumber, shingles, laths,
etc, etc.
LAW CouRT.-R, P. Duncan, D. M.
Wisdom and NJ. D. Trezevsnt were sworn
as attorneys of the court. The following
eases were disposed of yesterday!
TIq. Judgment below affirmed.
1888. Judgment below affirmed.
79l. Dismissed by agreement.
"a. Dismissed for want OF prosecution.
az. Judgment for plaintiff. damsges waived.
~. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
76S. Judgment for plalptin for S24 6.
The following cases are set for trial to-
day
6SA Seiby VS. Baugh.
6S5. Chandler VS.. Leatherman.
$50. Wootun VS.. CoOpers and Woodward.
6s7. WasOn VS.. Martin & 20. Of al.
SIS. Dear n VS. same.
$50 CAN'T, admir-, VS.. Hardin.
800. Herring VS.. Sherry.
692. Sorry VS.. Winters.
6sL. Williamson VS.. Jackson Insurance Co.
6q7. Fralme VS.. Cowgirl.
t99. DllehRy VS.. Brooks q Co.
700. Simons VS.. Rice 4 Dav s,
T04. Allen & Co VS.. Winters.
706. Shell vs.. Winters.
7O6. Winters vs.. Shell
7e4 Quinlan VS.. lemon.
795. Parrish VS. Gilosrt.
79S. Miller vs.. Elliott.
T97. Calhoun VS.. WEIGH.
7gs Hayden VS.. Mallory ct al.
799 Briggs & Patterson VS. Henngen.
500. Steamer X. L. woodward VS.. Graham.
Sni. Burton, Titus & Co. vs. Fletcher.
Sl2. Butts vs.. White.
5U3 YouDgs VS.. Dickens ct al.
500. GIN & Bro.vs. Murphy.
sos. Mayer VS.. Richmond & Watering.
SO6. Solomon VS. WEIGH.
So7. Mcdonald VS.. Beer.
sos. Jsssup Co. VS.. Beatus & Co.
500 Heisland vs.. O'Hern.
$40. White vs.. McGrath.
81. Drak & Robson VS.. Hill.
$40. Marzsraiti VS.. Shide.
8l3. Holbenstadt VS.. Murphy
Sl4. Irwin VS.. O'Hern.
sl5. Same VS., same
SIG. Wsggener VS. Portion.
Sl7. Partee VS.. Foster.
SIS. Same VS.. same.