New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1867-07-20

bs,c nrcr ,be outside The proper time 10 determine
what shall he submitted stPna%y "n' ~ ~ r,it in
proper shane and after that the question Wl alf>' VIM
Ibs he mi I'M The body aud what on deck. At that lmg
- 49, and fllicgr discussion viii De freely accorded
20 every member Of the Convention. 80 ~, to,,.
MI TILDIN Dem, y. " argued that the aooI
,icr AZ "a section by the Convention, virtually en-
bodied ii forthwith in the Constitution TO DO pre-
scuted 70 the people. nnless some action were taken
IN Inc contrary at the time of its adoption HIS
pdiyidual opinion was that the Suffrage question
emf that II thew wished 10 Mt the Constitution out
of nerilous contact with party politics. they must leaye
also have the question Of the Count OF Appears
submitted separately to the people 50 that y ue
could obtain necessary relief Beyond these two Gu'
tions lie knew Of no other that were desirable 20 DC po
aucc of thfir work as citizens OF 4 state enbf"glhI
4O0O0 OF population. and asserted that ID M lu'i
chorts, he should rise above M eOlsiusI w ~ ~ a
lie regretted that the majority woud nor tons,n ,
reasonable posponcment, such as "ouiu AV'
Iudce ROBTRTsON Dem. New YORK; said there was
no restriction IN the act unUer WIch ti,' The
subject Of separate submission, IL was then o.e
were NOT 10 discard old material and build up new COP
.tittiur such was the evident intention OF the Less
TO-" MI ,lic7 Tie Turrort Of the act ~ that
this Convention SHAH submit separate % s,t
and changes i'm the old Constitution such as ria "a
advisable The provisions IN regard To the VOC va,
hc taken clearly shows that amendment OF '' o.G ~
those changes are 10 De separately submitted ihIH
would bee wanting in duty 90 thcir co1sutu,s nu N'S
,b III nc quest on of The mode Of submission
of Inc results OF their abOrs 10 the decision ol COM
mtcc 1900. .,.o,,..t a.
Mr. GRAVES Rep. HclImer did NOT see The need' al
This stage OF the proceedings. for the passage 81 >
luton: h. therefore lay il upon the table LOST
~ % count OF 81 Yeas To ~ Nays. -...,..,.,.,,
Mr.. W, DONALD rep. oneida and MI TOWNSHIP
tEep. Rensselaer, spoke IN favor of the olgm%i Ic'ou
tIor and opposition to the amendments ia the 'oui>e
his remarks Mr. Townsend said that ne dld MOI az
with his friend from NcvlOIh Mr. Daiyl IN "a! thd'
the Democratic paYty lost power consequence OF duol
ing The Constitution OF 1896 but that party 1871 ls power
i'm sls because 10 proposed 10 surrender he (IIlOl o
the United states to slavery Nj IoWnotnd was men
ga led order asked the indulgence al tc con
Ncutlon and proceeded The feeling - strong tnc
that il compelled Ms iond from HOciand MI tuue,D
break over the isOtherma line o party ana VOC I"r
VAN BuItA. .
The vote being then taken on M Concers substitute II
was lost The Yeas and Nays were called upon tltllu
mcnt offered by MI Murphy, aud u was lost 10y a N"ie
of Yeas ~. Nays t2. ~, ,,,.
Nh III RPIIY moved 10 amend by adding The follow
ing Bat nothing herein contained sb3A lht w Pow
81 Of the Convention in the Committee OF The Whole 70
consider The prOpriety of submitting the provisions q" e
Cou-flutO under consideration separate ~, NhCA
was thus further amended 10y Mr. ALNOEb: But nplh
ing herein contained shah prohibit Tho CONSIDERATION OF
aly amendment already considered u committee ol me
Whole 10y tho Convention uiOn TIC Incoming OF ttt 10
OF Committee. hut such amendment snail Oi III
tSe Convention be alutnGablc' The amendment WIS
accepted.
Mr GRAVES Rep, IHerldmerjgrroposed this amend
sion Of any part Of The Constitution framed ~ ms Con
Ncnto deferred until tie whole CONSTITUTIONS framed
10y The Convent Ou's
The amendment was adopted by vote Of 50 20 ~ Tn
Yeas ana Nays then called upon nc resolution "H
amended, am 10 carried by vote o. Yeas 81 Nay b.
as IgI .gN