New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1867-01-30
xxxIxru CoNGREss-sEcoNp SESSION.
IT TELEGRAPH
SENATE WASHINGTON, jan %, 1857.
TIE MOTLRY-sRWARD CORRESPONDENTS.

SENATE. WASHINGTON, Jan. %, 1857.
The CHAIR laid before the Senate the response OF
the President to the resolution Of Mr. Sumner calling TOT
OF Mr. Motleys resignation as Minister 10 Austria. 1t
was ordered to be printed and laid upon the table
THE VETO OF THE COLORADO BILL.
The CHAIR laid before the Senate the Presidents veto
of the bin to admit State Of Colorado into the Union
The message was read. ...-, .-....
The CHAIR asked what action would the Senate take
on the message .- -.
Mr. WADE Rep, Ohio said "Let us have vote upon
the bill" 70
Mr.. JOHNSON Dem, Md supposed the Senate would
not want to pass the bill during the morning hour ne
moved to postpone the subject until tomorrow.
Mr. WADE hoped it would not be postponed
Mr. DAVIS Dem., Ky) thought the subject one OF i'm
porance and that II ought to be properly consdered
made the special order for tomorrow -
Mr.. WADE said this was an old question II had been
fully debated and must be thoroughly understood Sen
ators ready TO vote now as they could DC 10
Mr. SALISBURY Dem. DELI asked that the subject
be postponed until tomorrow, that he might have an
opportunity TO review the charges Of usurpaon ana
ha heard the most disgusting language used In this
Senate e0uched in Frenchfed phrases and he wished 10
institute comparison between them and the language
MT HENDRICKS Dem, IndJ opposed the passage OF
the bill would like 10 know why the language OF the
third second Of this bill differed from the Language OF the
same section of the Nebraska bin He would IKE TO
know why the ratification Of the fundamental condition
OF negro suffrage submitted to the state Legislature
While M IL Saf bs 3 az T se
to the large States and as political expedent that
would not succeed In the long run.
Mr. JOHNSON was addressing the Senate when the
morning hUurexpired, and the message went over unt
tomorrow, aud was ordered TO be printed
TIE TARIFF BILL.
The Tariff bill was taken up The pending question
was upon Mr. Cattols motion to increase the duty on
nickel from to 40 cents per pound The motion was
disagreed to by Yeas 16; Nays, 81
Mr. CATTELL rep, N. j. moved to amend by striking
out ten per cent ad valorem nickel matter or oxide
and inserting In lieu of 20 cents pound The amend
ment was agreed 10.
Mr.. FRELINGHUYsEN Q2ep, N. j. moved an
amendment change the duty wrought iron washers.
nuts bolts and rives wholly partially finished, from
"a to cents per pound The amendment was agreed to-
Mr. FRELINGHUYsEN moved to amend by changing
the duty steel carriage springs from TO cents pei
pound The amendment was agreed to by Yeas III
Naysl6
above amended by including railway locomotive and
truck springs wholly or in part unfinished -,
In debate on this point SIR WILLIAMS Rep, oregonl
said that IL the rates such articles were increased
much more he should against the whole BILL though
hc one OF the committee who reported IL.
The amendment was disagreed TO by Yeas 12 Nays ID
MIR DAVIS Dem, Ky.) moved TO amend by increasing
the duty Russian Manila Italian and all other hemps,
from $40 10 $50 poru; on flax or hemp rom - u slo
per tim; jute and sal grasses, from - to $40 per tun
nny cloths gunny bags, &C. valued at 0c per yard
frO &C. to Oc. per pound and valued at over 10c per
yard from &C. pcpound to ic per pound and 80 per cent
AL YalOrem. ~
Mr. DAVIS said he believed the whole bill game
Of grab and each Senator grabbing for all he could
get for his particular interest he had offered this amend
nent to get his share. He should move to reeonit the
hill TO the Committee 10 he considered In connection win
the Internal Revenue b for the purpose OF reducing the
taxes of the country, at least s00,OO0O0O year .
While MIR Davis proceeding with his remarks, the
Presidents Private Secretary arrived with the Veto Of the
| bill 10 admit Nebraska
The question at the conclusion Of Mr. Dayis's speech
was upon his motion 10 rccomnHt with instructions.
Mr. GRIMES Rep, Iowa. asked for division OF the
question cOmmlttal and instructions. lie would Ike
10 see bill recOmmited If 10 could not be recon-
mitted he would like 70 IL postponed He was In favor
OF the first clause Of Mr. Daviss instruction. but he was
unwilling to bind the Committee 90 reduce taxation by
specific amount He moved 20 strike out that clause Of
the Instructions
Mr. DAVIS accepted the modification proposed, and
the question was upon recommtting with instructions 10
the finance Committee 10 compare II with the present
tariff Of the Internal Revenue Laws, &c.
Mr. SHERMAN Rep., OhOl hoped this would be test
vote To refer the bill at this stage OF the session was 10
kill It. II men who were opposed 10 the bill hoped 70
kill IL by loading 10 down with amendments they might
well kill ID now. -
After debate by Messrs SHERMAN, HENDERSON
Ulep MOI. BROWN 0ep. Mo-, GRIMES Rep., Iowa.
FEsSENDEN Rep., Mel and HENDRICKS dem, Ind },
the vote the TecOmmitting was taken IA follows:
Ranu