Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1867-11-09

uuerance, and repel II as soon as IL was ut
tered, go that he might not be regarded as as.
sentIDg TO il. That / understand to be the pre-.
dicaie OF the metaphysical purgation Of his
proposition, and be refers us to authority on
charging fraud, in which all sorts OF iaiquity
and fraud are charged on the part Of q party
in court. The argument 10 as we under
stood the answer, that. inasmHch az John
to charge Richard Roe with being a rascal,
therefore q member OF the bar has a right to
charge member Of the Court with being
rascal. Knowing, as 1 do, the clear percep.
tons ard great ability Of tbs respondent, my
admiration OF them causes me to believe that
he would not rest the case upon this authority.
Gerry or in an answer charging one party with
corruption Of any kind, that can be made q
good authority for charging COURT with lying
In open Court: For when the respondents
Language 10 fully considered-"put in Its ver-
nacular"-it 10 charge Of lying. because
the facts in the order Of Judge
Fi,her protested to be within the
nounced As false from beginning to end, and
an audience il called upon 70 witness this de.
nunciation. Now, an audience ought not to
upon a. Witnesses unless they are on the stand
1t 10 very vicious practice IN courts OF justice
TO try cases before q mob or with tho Influence
Of mob: and do not think this audience
ought TO have been invited TO try that case. /
think the. was very considerably out Of the
way. While, therefore, the respondent as
Sumes tR6t ne 0lo not bnte0Q 70 Ieuect upon
the majesty OF Q court, its dignity, or its In.
tegrtty, does not the question after all come to
this I" Was IL not donep' 1ft 10 In the power
OF the English language to do IL, Ut was done
most unmstakably done; and No court can
survive the submission TO It.
NOW, II l know the pulsations Of my own
heart In this case. and believe speak the
sentiments OF each Of the justices upon this
bench. when say that would not iniiict
upon my brother Bradley . Judgment that /
myself In his positien. L have been there,
with the excitement surrounding him, and /
have asked myself the questionable called
upon a. Judge and . lawyer / would
not visit the penalty OF tnsubordination
and contempt upon myself2" and In view
OF the final Judgment have been com.
PEELED to answer that would. was in
hopes that Brother Bradley would take the
same view OF It. We all were. We have waited
hopefully and patiently, and not without In.
dustry. that that might supsrveue. Bot there
ID no accounting for the resolutions u men.
men. They have an account to settle with
Themselves, and the respondent In this case has
felt Il his duty to take course different from
that which the court thought he should. The
court conid see In the condition Of this case
no alternative bat the most absolute self.
uegation on the part OF the respendent
There IL one view Of this subject which We
must not omit - present., and which OF itself
seems 20 ~ 3 satisfactory answer to the posi-.
ton assumed by the respou den that at the time
he used the laneua In relation to the order
OF Judge Fisher. embraced In the rule, there
was no Court In existence competent % punish
him for that Language tor contempt.