New-York tribune., 1867-03-30
.STOCK-JOBBING.
ARREST ,,F DANIEL pREw-$sjO,OcO BAI--wpAr ONE
-.p,t.,-,, .rttINES OF ANOTHER

ARREST <,F DANIEL DREw-$ajO,OCO Bhl-"hAl ONE
ERoKER THINKS OF ANOTHER.
In ,lc Stnrcmc Court, an order Of arrest Las beeh
granted AGAINST Daniel Drew the great Eile operator o
a e..yee .of fraud. in which S2jOOOO b'i was ashou anu
given Tie complaint on which theaireSt was Hlah'cu
CHARGE. in substance that Leonard Huyck whom the
,,afutiff represents through assipments) WIN some
OTHERS entered into arrangement Win iani,l IiIcW
aId J. a. Burr Ia form pool IN Ire WIN u"sis Ise
5000 shares: that on thc 29tIi O J.il'+iS ,i'
being tie of some $500 shares these parties
vs. i,, in twice as much-lSGOO shares and operate
the pool for the benefit Of all concerned; thdt ns
Iangcncnt was to continue Ior SlN! u"S & @ to h., w
Etdeu were to act rs brokers' hal i@lu" ~ N" , ~ M
me right 10 take 5000 shares more, nul d' not lal
pIur 10 such am agreement, large ot du htri u1u
f1r tlc pool, and tha flSh Belucn hiIN ~ H. u i
.othea one Interested in the pool, named banter d,o
S, Yr,, t,"t Drew conducted operations not the
benefit Of the pool hut for MS own b'c!it' hcPHS
Is on,ratiors made over S2CoOOOO IL is claimed thai
fh, c,u as really made for ard belonged 10 thc pool,
uut tlt Drew failed 10 give any account @l we le
thr othcr persons Interested; ana II j. lnLrl fdihcI
that hc did not put i'm the SCO0 shares Whch nc
do and Therefore Is not entitled TO snare III tc
Uuyck Ultimately failed but was induced n} irPI' ''hld
lions 81 risk * Beldcn 10 execute some hhu "i '.>SS
lItu f them. This assignment - Cdmch 10 nave pth
procured 10y fraud The plaintiff procured luuf lo
sl775g7 against Huyck ana ihel lhe execution n'It
returned uusati~ficd, procured from bm an aNsElh" ~
of his claim against Drew lie hcld 2gW SiAcs l" M
t 10 claimed. were procured 10y ih, tIHHI tH npn,a m
the original pool and the the palntiii Claims a. ''"ihs
The summons in this case issncd the 2td inst
and made T1furabe in 20 days. The complaint which
sets fort in detail the charges We have ci"lca anolt
was sworn 10 Tuesday last. Accompanying lhls com
plant are attached copies of the original agreement Tor
forming thC pool. and letter written BY william l5ei9cn
interest I'm ibe ,ool i'm which the latter makes some i'll
crcStlnc eations o>pectmg the great Railway hHs
for whom the firm Of Fish a Bcldcu were brokers a.
% aft, las been printed with the complaint 30 Is mo-
Violation of secrecy to quote the following sentences
from 10 to show what one Nal!-st broher thIhhs Oi
Ngw .YoHE. jane 3D. let7.
Auo, immediately sfer the s.oc ht been purchased
Vao (rccolcct the tr pool sold o! W"t 's
Dish and discovered certainly that Pi'i Drew
cool deliberate g. t1H1r anu
..fsa. tiu, in We a night j. % e fh"e
minds would take the following 'oHirt.
B met and nothing could nothing hi Ho1a I -
rt one - that tle told the members Of the pool tue Lace
hTolcAt ttclr 90 once 10
sE event would al the most have 90 to uouguot ilan
r,G,4 M, ,r.einaI margin Drew hss been c-lattr
sr s u of money lie intends 20 d'faa ile sch
their gts We hfyc stood here having b
stand by Nj Drew who has keu ir gsuc in @ aut
im Fish schemes
aud kHoWng the interval that
could orre e. u position u Sc
alG esl ri thc Interests " thc pools provided ~ Ie
/ e . not DO. .r