The New York herald., 1867-03-30
THE oURTs.


~--~~~~>~~~~~>~-~~~~~~~~~~
eevaT q ApstMs
re Express Nswspaper Cass- -Opassss q she
Cssrt A0rnias shs Ordsr - sale, 20.
Bsssss Chisf Judge Daviss end Pan Beach
AepAsS r. Clark Jsns BkoeAs saS Ihasss
Bvos-Ths following decision h shs ven known cass
vas rssdsred yesterday By this eesr.-
This no<ion 10 dismiss N appeal from q srdsr e
che general term Il ths New Yosk Csnmoa Flea -
Osse declaring the rsAs se ths pastsa sn1 an sgAsr
dsaying ths dsgsaAass's nstsa for nsv trial TAs
fAcss stated IN ths opsnisa of this cosr1
Henry A cvsn fss ths .etsa, n. Keenan, sad \ A.
Reyno,ds oppsssa #E -
Hcs1 J-rhis action uas brought for the purpose Of
closing the shin or parnsshiP alleged % sxss b.
toa Of The nswspApsr called n New York tspvsa
During the year 1854 an application was mads and
s & = q :sss y = 8. :: :s ss
;ss :ss trial % sesoss - sss ss;l S.Srss.y ~ lees. 1885,
The nes.on q de paint for isdgmsss was granted.
and The judgment order decied The rights Of De pr.
Sirscsss al: q q. E.srss .sssSisSn.s. Snasr sss
1ireceae4 Il reeree named md ordered the rfsrss 70
-. - sa: = sss g =; s:.
nssshp ess II costs and expenses; hat the rsisrss
Ole his sspe a ne question of - plaiusirs costs
ssssss rus orass - sssssss 3 ssss iss sSs -
sos11Gl lnns ns4s EsbeuaU 9. -loQk AssyAg !
kSssjsn scssSsS ma. @ 3 ssss ssssss5.s - 80.
- - e.aaA ~ tss.isoay. ~ aedl.oes esf - NY
lss< - .ssass :sss sssIa:4. |. = - ls1
1ssS - SkS Zssss $685. &c. - isSsnsss
1Ials & nts..gZ 2, assA sess sessea hs.sa I.
sssss 60 g - sssssdssss = - yis:ai ~
.s = 3 s'l s 'ns nSs :, e: s:.s s... y: z
fsssssj i, - E s sss ss % pssSs Ssd:s 4 aos
=: . !: 80 g :s's: = s:& & &9,;ss ss.ss 3: a =
esrioestssy .ersly. nd % agpe.t nor js1gne!t ~
g.. a n ~: g: &. Sss, sss ::: .: 8:
snA ts1gnsae snssree thssssesc. a11oaai qssseieas
may ss ssea vhlcA hejadgnsas = sAesyecis snathe
~ : ssEss . a. soast ~ Wa G i 80 sSsn !. ;Sss
sssans = tae tsSs.s.s wtI = a.s a sse sglsa 2
. "a .ss 3 snsssd in any pressss osdsr sc:sss
NJ ssils y the casa Il 10 nus The practice y allow
cass e cs@s e this court apon fsgmsnsary ssa by
SIa3A Ussl Do csscluson of shs rsfsrsncs aad iae
Gs,issss sssk " vsil Is K, ssa, i il = Va 49,
g: :. NJ . sss cs s:ss' .ss 4. s:s fs -:
I :. & ,ss sds.i: sss : -. :: a. ss:s :Sss:s ~ ~
.s: ds.,.s T. ssss ,as upon W. &. 1sss essss
ss So - S s.ss se'' ssn.' @ g: ~ s'vs ;.s
e: - -; :: ssas.::. s:::a. sssi ss:.
poaag snAavSs arc nos . nis wish ths cissk q tSis
sss = ~ sesisa sAas sae russ . = have sssssd
Snsve anA ehas any cass nas essn decided Asesasly
ssss n. pps"sa Sossvss a. casesss css M -
w. uAsss seion for new ssal . denied sn1 kss
80 Aesxnsaes q ths Order sf February 1885 dsnyas
sp& - aes ssssisd, which denial was srnsd Il shs
0eese q the General Term of J. Ssvtimbse .,
~ .ess sssA q Gass &: 90: 1:pssp; pss ; 81.
ss s.s ~ e :gR'i fss e ~. srdsr
5udgnsns has bsen entered But ihars wss no sr,a q
ahs acsoa the oceassoa sugsssted That tsia teok
ss vsss sass vas never Ssios. he court III Sss az
There ba1 beeA previous trial Of csTtain Quesiens in
would "a the court in ascer.a,ning the merits Of ss osss
shs precise written questions samised 70 che jury and
Of aohng else By the ssablshed practice those
1ons might embrace the merits OF the generally
they might be limited any portion Of it Sucn pro-
the particular questions submitted only 1t subsequent
dime; ths action itself must be brought on for trial when
~. q s .ss % s ss
- csgned issue undsr the former pra0scs In Chancey
=: ss q .'s 3. . no. .
&hs ceut before which the trial IL had The
ich ths result b presented the trial Of the action
sion . wAich s entitled II may rely upon as
1acsosy and conclusive may accept In part, reject
,.s Ss s..!s sE cyns ":' Gssa sss o..ss. Y Sns
sssl .na Az inward Of .s.ss S:s ,.ssS %ssT
Snsi asr verdict upon fgnsd1 issue was in the dis.
erection o the Chancellor and not the subject Of an ap
night . sss L sses =
che sesssd practice Also 10 regard 70 verc upon issues
,ssd Az ASh sup S code s1a .nss RSrs;. " Forrest as
81 n Y. h iSo schssck Va Dart q n. Y n 40 The
% this court and dsrvss no additional authority from
being connected with an order Of the special term de-
md settled N the manner have mentioned.
Cases Argued and Submitted.
msASon Vas made for leave 70 reaxgue The case Of
Noseaa w King, which involves the question Of the
naseabihsy Of Racket rver, stream rising Hamilton
county and flowing nosshwasd ono hundred and my
miles and snpsying inso the 81 Lawrence. Submitted
Emssssi ConsaJss - jobs BvoaAerow. Tho motion
ads N this case 70 dsniss the appeal was denied with
ne NsS JSsy kstsal Bsssu Life hssrascs co~psry
=. ~ sssrs Ssgsryi'1,s q Ns's Ye,k.Ihis X % Gauss
and thas Judgment affirmed In the Court Of Appeals
q hs la term The molten for leave 70 reargue wss
&spsm BrssA, EsecSss, a., Rsposdnx ~ Wsigis~s
xss hwpea6s6 and lpps1oe,2 ARGUED for respondcnt
fssss - as Pepi<-No . On the preferred calsadar,
3as Submitted without aygumsnl W
0arrat Absa and Aso6kv, Repomdenis, ~ Peer vam
Colder d a., AppeHGn<< Argued and submisted.
Txom0s RnbevS, Resposdent, vs WSls0M Coed, Appel
ioa.-subnitssd ON brief
Vrosmr o. Kina-Argued and submitted.
COMMON PLEAS.
nlechanics, LIen-Proceedings Aeninse the
New Ysrk Theatre.
Before Hon. J. & Bosworth, Referee.
A. W. CAap;s - Alexander r. Stewart & al This
ct,ou ~ ,nsituted for the foreclonure m echsnica