The national Republican., 1867-11-21

stamps, aad thus give u . legal value a .S.twss
evident that Whatever might Be the effect of such .
evidently could not have operated, when recorded,
oon,truoys notice. the law treated the nr.t record
null, By TSaa,,ns to b. recorded r s .s'9Sa 9na
second record. The motion for an injunction ".
oysrruled.
3os. BARLEY vs. Hyde ct al. The Court in this
~ and Us s.Trisi and RidSi. vs. *. R.esir.r
Railroad Company. Tas sasiior having f.pcftsd
this case the fees proper to be paid By the plain
W. H. Mack VI. Charles wsruer. NJ J. ssaOid for
plsnta, ". J. Miller for defendant. Thi. 10 mo.
tlon for an injunction 10 restrain the defendant from
prcessdius 70 enforce legal remsdis. upon the plata.
the settlement which 10 the basis Of the suit at law
he was not himself and being uuduly wrought upon,
feet upon him. The Court oysrruisd the motion.
Atso'eloef, the Court adjourned until this morn
ing
CIncuIr rCoURr.-Chief Ju,iies Captte.-The
Court yesterday was occupied as follow.i
l20. National Bank Of Metropolis vs.. John Bligh.
osd ys.tsday, and the plaintiff By counsel suffered
SOC. o'Brlon vs.. poushsrty Case hsrstofOr. dis.
| nissed-restored on motion Of J. J. Johnson.
S784. Plats Va. Knor. Davis for plaintiff; Gram
msr for defendant This IL an action for money re-
e.ivsd BY III. plaintiff for the defendant. u:'.whish
| ing certain claims to portion Of the same.
The Court directed the lary, II they believed the
evidence, to and verdict for the paiatif, and they
| found accordingly, as,essing the damage At s274,
with interest from the time at which the money was
| demanded.
oRoRoErows BOARD BILL.
4074. D. W. Curtis VS.. George W. Tbeaker. Jones
| 4 Ashford for plaintiff, and Norris for defendant.
This was.n action Of repleyin to recover from the
defendans possession Of certain chamber furniture,
which It was alleged he unlavfully detained from
ts owner, the plaintia. The defendant alleged that
the plAintf was his boarder, and had agreed TO pay
s26 month for two meals day; that he had taken
| cents per meal for the extra meals, was about to
leave the hotel in debt ESQ 0S that under these cir
eumstanes, he said the plaintiff agreed to leave be-
that he engaged two meals only and avsred that he
owed the plaintiff at the time he proposed TO leave
Theakers hotel but about ss7, which ho tendsred to
ing more. II was further insisted BY the plsintif
that at the time the paintG brought the marshal to
seire the goods the key Of his room in which they
therefore in his constructive possession.
The Jury found for the plRnHf ith nominll dam
ages, aud Mr.. Norris nlsd an Informal motion for
new trial, and said motion was Informally over
| l4s9. Teely Va. shanahan. Merriek and Ennis,
R. s Davis and Rsndall This case comes into the
Cirouit Court issue out Of ehancery. The case
tried some months since at the special term, aud
then reported In these columns Daring the progress
| Of that trial the fact appeared that dosd upon
within nftssn minutes Of her death and at a time
when she was nearly speeehls's II being doubtful
how far she was conscious Of what she was doing.
The court u6wilug to decide this fact sent to ths
party goana Dsely) was At the time Of making such
deed OF sound aud disposing mind. This question
wa, now submitted to the jury upon the depssitions
taken In the ehsnesry proceedings aud other ssti.
| mony.
Before the conclusion Of the case the court sd.
journed until this morning.