The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-11-07
LEGAL INTRLLIGENCR.

DISTRICT CoURTnJudge sharswood.-Aun Har-
ley vs. j. dimes B. Kelly. Ar action on promlssory
consideration for lanes in West Virginia. the title
note verdict for p'aiatif SSajS4 ~ 'H'
James Hayd,on VS.. John Be9son Ss An action for
alleged negligence of defendant In snoeing it, The
sLod attacked the bllity the witnesses for
the plaintiff. Jury out.
DISTRICT COURT-Judge Hare.-Ch aries Llnder-
man We. Anthony J. DreXel An action to recover for
work and labor done. The plainuT introduced
in need Of work, aud the detendanI was Induced to
@ aa H a1 S ns bat the espS9ts WI
ergaged him TO paint her portraits and orders were
is German epre ga9rant Of the Il English nj, Ian Ian
n rap ano '6 6eTeTe the business 5etWeen
them conducted with the ale always OF an inter
II was alleged that the orders for these pictures
wife. with his sanction, The smaller children We're
allowed to sit for the paintings, but the plaintiff
drapery furnished by their moihee He went on
with the work. deyoLing much time and labor.
The deleRse alleged tnss The deis6daPt though
ofthe rs porlrat OF Ihe adies dendI1oed IL a a
miserable piece Of work. He said the plaintiff ad
mme ediaiey sentword to the piaintif to cease work
on woud not be- TeceVe eT ave e
noreoyer alleged that the amount claimed s2lOO was
more than was stipulated for in the original trans
actions -,.
trial. N-
AllisOa.-
Montgomery. administrator, vs.. Blair. An issue to
try which of two wills Is valid the executed De-
ber 49, 1862 and the other the 23d of December
COURT OF QUARTER SESsIONs-Judge Pierce
John Rink pleaded guilty to charge ofIaTceny.
Nicholas Larkin was convicted OF charge of as
sarah 4. Wise plead guilty to q charge of larceny
Richard Walker was acquitted OF a charge OF lar
John Mack was convicted of charge OF the larceny
of q watch and chain belonging TO John Milward.
MI Miward testified that he met the defendant with
a party excursion, and that the defendant rob-
bed HIM of his watch and chain, and ran away to
George Tallman and Arthur Denny were charged
with the larceny of $40, belonging to John Murphy.
The principal evidence against the defendants was
imprisoned sixteen weeks upon this charge without
trial was subsequently discharged from prison. and
mitted without evidence. He testified that on the
evening of April 18th last. about 9 or o'clock he
their request went to Murphys saloon, No, Cal
They found Murphy, the bar-keeper and q man
named Gallery, there. Talman called flr liquor for
The bar keeper took out slate covered with money,
gave the change and put the slate back Ia its place
away. Arthur Henry took the bar keeper or to one
end OF the room, and engaged him in conversation,
and excited him In such a way that his nina
was entirely drawn from other parts OF the
room, and this third party, who was with Tallman
and Henry, stole the money from the counter, and
went away. soon all quietly walked out, and the
when he met TallmRn's party Ne did not know what
they were going TO do, but was made aware OF the
Upon cross KAN Inaton this witness acknowledged
aat hs hgq % SSd WIFE GssH aed cd 6unE
imprisonment. had to go to the Almshouse. He
OF The whole affair and had not come Into Court to
testify upon any promse of release or acquittal. Inn
work upon farm where he has remained ever since.
Samuel CorshaI (colored) was convicted of ohars
of the larceny OF pair OF shoes belonging to Edward
Delaney.