New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1867-11-16
Law INTELLIGENCE.
TIE CIVIL COURTs.

The creditors of Julius Schick, against whom
petition IN bankruptcy Wa hled IN the u > D,strst
Court petltiOurd 10 have him declared bankrupt
shck resisted the ground that ho had no property
certain alleged creditor named Caven, having obtained
lui lurnt against him for amount equal 10 the worth
81 his property. Jndg, Batcord decided that the ev
deuce was conclusive Thai thls JUDGMENT was op,aisa
~ preventing schcKs creditors from obtaining ticir
rights under the act, and therefore auudsed schick
Petitions In bankruptcy filed and referred yester
day. follows: ietitlon Of John Day 81 is Guy, re-
Of This city rIrred TO- Register Mal,,- ooo,o, ,,,o
case az Cumberland q. white against John L. Broancl, In
which the right. ad powers of the Ops Board 81 IOkcs
we're involved 1t Wis " cla < which has given
great trouble the Old Board 0i Brokers aud 10 vnrou'
charitable nnd benefit societies Ia this state the question
ing meicrs The ease wa. in brief this The plaintiff
made short sale Of Hudson before the doubling Of the
sleek of that company. when 10 doubled tho pur
chaser. claimed have the benefit OF that doubling The
defendant for several reasons denied this right Both
members OF the open bnlId OF bIoher-, ana mo
purchasers reported the plnth To- the Te'ent az de
the President such report 10 suspend doftutei, sh
Jeci however 20 a.. right Of appeal ~ the person ACCUSED
by the plaintiff. but while Il pending he commenced
this sit aud obtained injunction staying the action o
ton permanent. the plaintiff claiming that the Board had
right 10 deprive hm OF valuable risht When ne h,'u
purchased The Court holds that the open Board not
corporation nor a partnership, but SIMPLY Nnluhthiy
association That tie agreement OF me nenDSrs Is the
that tine plaintiff ON entering tho association, having
ass.ned 10 ly suSinn7o,g p5 den e no" poton
n may be- remembered that the United States seized the
seasIIu r. r. Cnyler on tho ground that slin In
tended for prvnteer In tho service Of the L. g Of Co
l0nbia against spain, aud that she was subsequently,
released on the ground that bona Tide sale ~ the ycse
and armament was intended The plaintiff In this ease
Mr. Nelson shipped board that vessel aud received ono
months pay lis went with the vessel when she sailed
for Cartla and continued. according TO his own
count In his duty. until SHE was handed over 10 me Co
lombnn authorities There he aud thirty other protested
but as they say compelled by violence 10 submit.
and carried 10 Carthageua There, after some dln
Gully on board the vessel ~ tie sailors swan 10 the
shore, aud applied TO the United States Consul, who ut
once interfered and sent tue recusant sailors home.
the ur 0s his return York. and demands his
gcs for that time less the so paid him. The main ques
ton Of difference between plaintiff aud defendant relates
a. the terms Of shipment. The plainun AYERS tht no
supposed he shipped for commercial voyage alone,
under the United states flag, clause to the United
States of Colombia being read to him Ia the shipping ar
tces, aud the warllke armament being carefully con
ccaed The defendants claim that the shipping articles
fully Get forth the probability ~ transfer TO the oher
nag, and covered that contingency, and that theNuns
In position aud the torpedo boats, &c, put on board
openly aud without any pretence OF coneeaimeht Inc
Judge Brady OF tho Court of Common Pleas by consent
OF counsel has sent the stuyyesalt divorce case to
referee for trial.
States Supreme Court for an injunction against the
Board Of Health Of this city, TO restrain them from inter
fering with This Is designed rs test
aud will be argued during the coming week. This
application has been made on behalf OF heny psv aver
su,iness ON Nnth-ave and Thirty-eighth,st - 4,
bar that tho 2sh rule OF this Court requires notices OF
argument be filed before the 18th day of Dcce
cndar for the January 1863 are then 10 be made mp
and causes cannot he placed thereon after that date
without the special order Of the Court, except preferred
cases and those In which reargiment may be ordered
In The United States Circuit Court OF Brooklyn yeser.
day, before Judge Benedict, Thomas LAWYER accused OF
carrying the business OF dlster without license,
was brought up The testimony wont to show that
the defendant carried ON the business Of dstler ~
a stable on Srabrng ST.. near Van Bruntst, south
brooklyn IL was also shown that LAWYER carried on inc
business In n building adjoining the same when hhd
been leased another party The counsel Tor inc &C
cused moved 10 strike out the charge OF d!sihhg Wi
ont license The ease given 10 the jury and Rier
three hours they were unable TO agree ANA the accused
was therefore remanded TO the custody OF the United
al