New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1867-02-09
c1URfS.
SUPREME COURT-CRcUrT.-FgB s.-Before Mr. JUS
tce CLERKE

SUPREME COURT-CrRcUT.-FgB s.-Before Mr. JUS
tice CLERKE.
DAY OF NQUESrs.
Fourteen inquess were taken yesterday before MI
TeSTv t. Harris sg Robert Stewart and ohersJuds
ment for plantfff ST ,254 10. .
John Church IT,, at. Jas NJ acknowledgement for
Jas j. Host agt Geo. R. acknowledgement for plain
same aef same-Judgment for plaintiff q, 10l 49,
Geo. W, Murfey agt. Abraham Isaaes.-Judgment LOT
Same act Sone-Judgment for plaintiff 1901 II.
John G. Haviland ct l'agt Margaret MoriiS-'"uS'
Ane ms W Nitsch agt Stephen B. Camana-Judg
ment for plaintiff $129 So -. s.,. INDIGNANT
Leon D: De Bort ct al agt Moses strausS'-'udsmen'
O John G. Gcttsberger agt Michael McLOughlin-Judg
Frederick Keeper agt acknowledgement for plaintln
$1,083 II. ~, ,>.oo I,dcn,ent
Henry NJ. Morris agt d. Anderson and others.-Judg-
" ferdinand stoepc ag chas ACKNOWLEDGMENT for
C TIA Mr. Justice LEONARD.
THE GERMAN COMPLICATIONS IN CoURr-CONSUlAk
PRIVILEGES
Francis NJ Brby sgt. Leopold Schmidt and another .
This is the same case in which the question OF con-
suar privilege relation to the other defendant arose
before The present motion 49, as was se ioFOr
eral of saxOny attend in Court and De examined hdr
sections 800 and S91 OF the Code, before trial Mr. H. ~
Iapangh The counsel here for the Prussan Government
appeared in the interest Of the King OF saxony ree
Inc that nnder the CONSTITUTION and the Judiciary act OF
1859 the jurisdiction over foreign ministers and consus Is
state SsteG could SaSiq aSqsire jurisdiction over them
The Court in accordance with s previous decision IN
eond not be compelled to appear State court and
could only be proceeded against in the United states
Tho point then raised that it did not appear
that the defendant Consul. The exequatur was
produced but held insufficient proof and the counsel
sOrbed with Prussia the appointments Oh saxon Consus
Mr. Iapaugh pointed out that while Hanover and some
other states had been absolutely absorbed or 70
Prussia, other States among when was sInDv
still retained the right OF appointing Ministers anu Con
suls for the defect Of proof he himself Knew we IGt
that Mr. Schmidt Consul and could make proof OIL
by affidavit Inquiries had been addressed 10 paIo
ask further time to enable them to receive an answer
Counsel for the paintln asked JnaJ MT Iaipuukh po
directed to make the affidavit as terms Oh INC po'one
The Court refused to direct the order to be made hold
ing that il would be time enough on the aourheo o"y
and postponed the motion to Friday next .
spaUlding and Richardson for motion; Mr.. Lapaugh
ALLEGED EyroEuoN IN NEwooRLEANs.
Adoph Bonchard agt Cuthb.n Bulitt
The plaintiff alleges in affidavit, which IS con-
frned In part by adavits Of four other parties that
in November 1862 the defendant was the Collector o the
made two purchases OF cotton in each Of which he bad
three partners the first being OF over GOO ana the
purchases being made under Treasury permits tt hey
paid tax on the cotton and sold IT, when the deiendn
threat extored $4,000 Of which the plaintiff claims
that onefourth, 05, was his For TINS sum ne now
brings suit and the defendant was arrested aud he 10
bail. 80. -. 80
The defendant now, on hs own AFFIDAVIT ana tna on one
NJ the plans associates or partners in the specuahOns
nosyey denies the receipt Of any such money or any
money whatever from the paintf directly, OF mdrecuy
and now moves to yacate the order. &c.,,
After hearing some argument the motion was deferred
l. n. Williams for plaintiff John McheOh ior ue-
PENDANT.
DECISIONS. .
Henry w. Nichols ct al agt. Peter n cromwell
Motion denied SO costs OF opposing 70 abide event
Catharne Cook agt. Bernard Cook-Report OF reIeree
confirmed and Judgment Of divorce granted.