, 1867-04-26
avaIIa aBgalla Statesman.
FRIDAY EVENING, APRIL 20, 1897.
District Court-May Term.


P.B. Johnson, Clerk of the District Court,
kindly furnishes US the following list Of cases
dockstsd for trial at the May term;
UNITED STATES CASES.
The Government of the United States VS.. An
derson Cox Indictment for cutting government
timber.
CRIMINAL cAsEs.
Territory of Washington vs.. W. @. Wood
larceny.
Territory vs. D. Boyd murder.
Territory vs George White robbery.
Territory vs Emil Bordinavs murder.
Territory W Simon 1Saacs larceny.
Territory VS Joseph Petty larceny.
Territory vs. John Doe Andrews, dIidS Poseyi
manslaughter.
Territory VS.. Thomas Donohue murder.
Territory VS.. James D. Pilkinson assault
with intent to murder.
CIVIL CASES.
Samuel Waterman VS.. VIM. Mclean and NJ
Thomas injunction.
Alfred Pepin ct al. vs.. Brown, Bros Co. {;
action for recovery of mules, etc.
E. B. Whitman and D. 8. Baldwin VS.. H. P.
Isaacs, Henry Laheur ct al. suit on promissory
note.
d. welch vs.. W. J. Terry ; suit on note.
W. J. Terry vs.. D. J. Welch suit on account.
Catharine Harris vs.. VIM. Harris; divorce.
ID. s. Baker vs., z. She'll ct al; action for
damages and restraining order.
WIN. Mclean vs.. 0zias Owen; suit for dam
ages aud injunction.
BrSwn Bros. l. Co. VS.. W. H. Fleet and J. G,
Simpson (Intervenor;) attachment.
N. H. Gates vs.. J. G. Smith; suit for debt.
David Imbler VS.. Joseph Petty and Mary Petty
debt.
Edward She'll vs. l.. S. Rogers for report of
receiver and referee.
Dennis MeCraith vs.. ]. c. Hawthorne tried
before court and taken under adTisement.
Charles Russell ct al. vs.. Ladd Tilton I'M
junction, under advisement
H. P Isaacs VS.. w. A. Moody and Lydia
Moody action for debt.
A. NJ A. Banchet vs.. Burw':i Busssll and
Alexander johnson.
F. W. Coman VS.. A. Frank; suit for slander.
Oscar Vansyckle VS.. W. G. Painter; action
for possession of town lot and for damages.
J. A. Barnes vs.. NJ. Barnes; divorce.
Fargo 4 Co. VS.. E. F. Smith, debt.
City of Wsla Wala VS.. J. L. Roberts ct al;
action bond.
Booth and Nevins VS. Harry Taylor; attach
ment.
Jeptha Arrison VS. Parker restraining
order and for conveyance.
Bloch Miller & Co VS. Demers attach
ment.
Guillermo Ruis VS. George Advert; attach,
ment.
A Allison VS. Shafer Criss; attachment.
VIM Philips VS. f F Smith; attachment.
Baldwin and Whitman VS. II ISaacs ct al. /;
debt
X Kennedy VS. W Patty; on contract.
o Brechtel VS. o Burboa; note.
S King VS. VIM Matter replevin.
S King VS. H Isaacs replevin.
S King VS. ] Cady repleyin for horses.
j Thibodo VS. VIM Lancaster attachment.
G CosgroVe vs. Hunter appeal
from Justices court.
J II Fruit Va Green ct al; on note.
W H Barrett VS. W Tompkns; attachment
George Van Wrinkle ct al. VS.. John beaverton;
on note.
Lnktou VS. W Terry; mechanics leiu
Hollan Parker vs. Brooks; on note.
Philip Ritz VS. Abram D Clark; note.
James D. Mix VS. George II. Dakin on note.
VIM. Phillips vs. ] S Ruckle debt.
o G Waterman VS. w Anderson and ] W
Wiley note.
A Mayer L Co VS. Neulop ct al on note
A. Frank Co. vs. W. R. Re1ford; attachment.
VIM. Phillips VS. A. J. Miner; repleVin.
J y Derrick VS. A. Rumney; money lent.
II Olmstesd VS. Z Smith; on note
Eugene Howard vs. bis creditors; insolvency.
James 4 Gavitt VS. A Seitel debt.
Snider L Reed vs. Shull; foreclosure of
lein.
Joseph Belouge vs. H A Robinson debt.
VIM. Matzger VS.. S. W. Babcock foreclosure
Of mortgage.
John Powell VS. Joel Hargrove and Wait /;
on note.
TT Demers vs. Nix and N Moore; on
note and for Injunction.
& Stevenson VS. B Fargo, Thomas and
Lew Day; on note.
II ONeil Va N Hartman; debt.
VIM Glassford VS. NJ Hartman; on note.
D Lamar VS. A Miner; debt.
Andrew LefavFe hia craditara. insoIvancv
Henry Hickey vs. his creditors insolvency.
Wm. Phillips VS. NJ Hartman; foreclosure of
material lein.
D Haines Bros VS. limerick aud John
Ramsdell on note.
D Baker VS. A Cain and r Cain fore,
closure of mortgage.
Henry Laheur vs. Julia Lafeur; divorce.
Emil Lowenstein L Co vs. NJ Hartman; debt.
Joseph Hancock vs. W Colwell on note.
VIM Hsebner VS. K Kennedy; on note.
VIM Smith vs. W Bender; attachment.
Prosper Geslin vs. barnett on note.
Fred Fuller vs. NJ Hartman ct al on note.
Ban6eld vs. W Smith ct al fore>
closure of mortgage.
Cassnder Boice vs. James Boice divorce.
Bloch, Miller L Co vs. H Lahsur and P
lsaacs damages for breach of contract.
Ford vs. D Allen ct al; on note.
Charles Haubert VS. Brown Bros l. Co for
services rendered.
Thomas Quinn vs. Regan; slander.
Suum VS. Geo F Thomas aud J Ruckle
on promissory note.
Linkton vs. Boyle; foreclosure Of mAtsria
lSiu.
A Ripperton vs. Charles Morton and JOSEPH
Smith on note.
Hellmuth vs. Joseph Bauer on note.
J. Warren vs. W II BAbcock on note
Swain Co vs. AlvAn Flanders on &C
count
Seller, Frankenau 4 Co vS AlVAn Flanders; OF
account.
WmPhfTiPs vs. NJ Hartman ct all forselosur,
Of mortgage.
Brown Bros Co rs Wells Fargo / Co; gar
nisbee Of Fleet
VIM ReIfOrd vs. W Miller ct al; appeal from
Justices court. -
Hosmsr GOwey>& Co vs>FfSaders FELTON,
attachment
Linkton vs. >Jossfa BeltrAmi A2oreelosure o
material leiu.
Lancaster vs. NJ L Barbs1Aet ct al; damage
On attachment.
BACON, LARD,