New-York tribune., 1867-06-19
The two statements ppear sontIaaeory \. a2o osloh


Upon roassemblng the vamnation Of Sergeant
Dye was continued. HIS suspicious we're rst excited at
the second time when Sarratt appeared and called the
time; witness did not consider Il anything remarkable
excited by seeing Booth talk 70 tho vaiuons man wit
ness was sitting facing the door OF the tleateF.
e. Please 10 tell the jury what Was tie nature OF the
Suspicion You had2 A. tbOusht that there
thing wrong, and from their talking about the President
Mr harrington here ntcrposed an objection The sus-
pcOns OF the witness are nos admissible. Mr Merrick
ground suspicion OF the witness The Court held that
in criminal cases, except ia special the sspcions
Tho examination resumod-After going to the theater
witness went oyster house. and while IN tne oyster
sot and that Booth had committed the act witness told
the woman at the house on st had never before les
was that all these circumstances did not occur 10 MN
until after the assassination ria witness meyer sns
Mrs snrrat and the same person UNTIL 2iier
witness aseertained that Mrs Surratt lived on % WhieD
witness ouy recoeced the fact after he question az to
Mrs SurTatts innocence was reised; dd not lecoslHe
Mrs SpTrqtE at the conspiracy ula as inc woman wa"
raised tbc window on II ST p - -,
Question By Al Gsilggs. Jgrof-I saw % iieS 81.
Of sdTatts ,G6 The night referred TO, and sometimes
~ Mr Iicraader, anotisr J,aor-su1att was then
dressed in drab hat and black coat; ala not see e
Psiei TGliarai stcoi7a and e1oine Ly M PiqycpoaL-
rant next TO Fods Theatcr in the resauIant wheh
the murder cOmniiied knew Booth; ne ire4nnuS
came in he in that night and called fOf WHISKY
gave it TO him; Booth alone and drank the WHISKY
and he then called for wacr and he PAID ana ne NSe
oa saw nothing unusual in his dress he was not us
Cused; from eight to ten minutes aftelward heard me
President ssinated had seen Booth before nat
time; he in With different gentlemen ana soue
with Harold in the afternoon OF April ~ iafou cIS % IN
and asked II had Booth; told him had not & ilar
old then went out and went away; IL Was about Clock
p wiinesssav nothing TO awaken suspicion NO queS
Daria O. Reed was next called and examined by Mr.
lived In Washington about thirty years
Prisoner at the bar was asked 10 stana up an4 ne MY MY
kaIi he lnaV
has known the prisoner by aS since ne was qhlle os
witness was in Washington on the day Oh the 4er ~
that tay in Pennsy lyania-ave, opposite tne NauOl
n, eennaintnnee with the prisoner; as he passed there
was recognition by bOth but do not know whether nc
or nodded frs his dress that occasion attracted my
attention.; PremQrked his clothing very particularly; hs
dress looked TO Dc Of country manufacture, ana was sOt
nricnar except that the SUIT attracted nay attention; II
wes suit Of that kind he had upon his feet new par o
brass spurs with large blue rowes YhleHeVlaenty were
bran new; he his head felt hat not very low
crowned, but wdebrmmed that MAS stIawooo'oe'' ne
was the avenue ln an Ordinary pace
Gross. Erdted 6y AZ. BrddieyWiiDe %aS "dtsSeea @
y the dress &c exceedingly genee anu Vas
peculiar; it such dress as would atiact sten'o
surlatt always dressed genteell} Dut thh HISs
somewhat different from what he bad been m the haD oi
wearing; witness docs not reeoleci Wheh ie sS" 90,
last before the assassination, DnI lhlhs u VIC
about the time OF inc 0lynss when ~ VIC coming nom
the country bad met him sometimes ~ Luhnpn, &
rpy's stable; had never said that suBFati was
frequently in his (winesss room witness meyer .o1 s
one that the place he met Suflatt on Apl IA Mss & t
fhpr m i'NVhS'''N
telling acquaintanecs OF surrats age aud appedrhec;
do o1 rocoect whether surrtt had beard on the oeea
Mr. BRADLEY desired to have the privilege OF recalling
Mr. Reed for erOSs-eXamnaion ~ some Insure tne aiet
tho defense shall have eonsulie1 Wh NinesS 10" o'
Mr. Darlington objected to this being without
precedent, aud held that there was no rue VI co"i' "
justified such course. It'll, .h
Mr. Bradley argued that il was matter wltnn 'e re
sound discretion of the Court. The defense e1peieu W
prove that Mr. Reed had made statements ont ., eS %
contradictory OF what had been testiieq 70 IN Sont
defense however did not know that Ai hreu Naa w ~
called they conld not put The operation pa don Nle
the absent witness referred to wbs mere lhe ufS u
me question reserved until tomorrow nettmpy
susan Allen jackson (colore, was ne1s @ @ s
examined by Mr. Pierrepont-W Witnesses S
susan Mahoaey; marrled two weeks aitef NI' lSM
colls assassination; Friday, in Ap1l Mts SuiIStt
went down the country between IL anu y eiOeh lo
he and NIrs surratt returned between and o'clock;
witness saw surIatt in the dInngYo0m after that talking
TO his mother witness had never seen John n Suflsie,
she had only living at The house three weeks ME
surst said it was her son who was present; MT snsr
witness in the room 70 take IN pot oi ea ana u was
thea that Mr surtt ana his nef we're r. tSat the man
You with Mrs surfatti A. Yes sir, tal is ne bsi
Mrs surratt asked me 10 bug In an extra aishi khe"
annie snrratt; was living in the same house with her
h Ct orfnlt the Monday after the assassnatioe the
examination written down; since then ana lsst "eeh
was taken 20 the War Department by MI kely. ana
e, ,nii,ed hcrc my testimony written down then
have always made the same statement make now saN
John sur that night, but had never seen hn Deiois
or since ti week. when he was brought here; had
% beru living at Surratts three weeks before tat
ne witness sure she never saw the pIiioneI 81 ls
Surratts until the night the President Hae assasnaled
that was the night saw the prisoner there's never saw
bc nsoner before that me and IL was on the night OF
he asasnation witness Insisted II was the night Of the
asst situation. CO. 49,.
The Court said the same answer had Oeeh gwen ~ eaSt
a dozen times. -. -,
M, Bradley said he wanted no reflections from the
The Court said any one q Ihe qn!est comprehension
could have understood TIE ansNe -, 81.
Mr. Bradley said his comprehension was y ssul as
that OF the Court aud he wanted no reflections -
j0ges SdlgStOH Gnd cfdniided 0y 1f ffeIfPO'
Witness was IN 1863 and Is yet bOObkeepef at te St
Lawrence Hail. hotel In Montreal Canaua Wilnes VIZ
shown the arrival book register at the hotel the Dook
of hills uald and leaf from The departure BOOK suOWnK
the time when travellers left and the route iey TOOK III
hook OF arrivals under date Of Apg 1865, witness Iohl
Inc name OF John HARRISON and the name under GATE VI
Auri Is; the first arrival was az lO0 a. ul ana tue ccVhu
oiivql a 1880: the party who registered his hhne s
Toln Harrison paid his bill ON thel0h OF April nut ait
mai leave until the 2th the book shows; on the lsi
te man who registered the name OF john lialisoh on
sayod short time he registered his name ana elt ahos,
immediately when Wltuess elt Oh INC i-'h - ""' ~ -
Cross, nomination by ht' BIodey. jr.-Hauisop IN
ilri no bill on the 18th could not identity hc prisoner
A. the man who registered as John HarIlsOh sler e
death Of Mr.. Lincoln, ana inquiries were lutuc i1t
rsOn witness remarked that man answering the deStI
ton gwen of Harrison bad been at the hotel g.
Mr. Bradley. said the defense would admit ha' e.
Montreal the 9Th ana loill OF Hpii 'o''
aud that he registered the name OF John HARRISON Jhey
Admitted that the names were In surIatTs hhi"hhs'
Mr. PierrepOnt said tho prosecution was tleh save"
much evidence. ,.e, - -. .,,.,,o, .,
that worn by Harrison. The Court then took recess u
III 10 o'clock tomorrow,
POLITIC1J.