The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-10-18

Third Fourth, and Fifth Divisions Of the ssS9ra Fo11fa
sons We're taken and the same In ths Ftrst ssReE per
FS Ws9d ES9Ea 5 @ tb a9d EEhth Dysion che
third Ward the votes Of upwards OF ten unquaIifsS
PS wSfd upwss u Of sya Pvo S9 q ne
Eleventh DIVISION Of the TwonyseCond Ward 1n 1ae
The petition then goes on:-.wherefore your nett.
$loEssaid Campbell has da9 tRe slsSssS %lssSs
deipha, having received more votes than were sYs
for William A. Leeeh, the returned candidate or for
the election was undue and the return false In de-
clGring and returning the said William A. Leech as
Your petitioner, therefore Prsys that your 4OnOrs
plaint and TO make such orders as be necessary
tSat You viii order decree and adjudge the SAID ps
turn of The % %aldwilllam Leech g the office Of RE-
sra escs f%P % sa T4s e. GSS saS s a ana
will take such action the promises as you may see
fit. And as in duty bound they will ever pray, etc,
HhsSSOEe Mton {. Harvey, Eugene S f. Iasia,
3. Frank Paris, Lewis s Gordon,
Thomas Z. Hamilton, To6n Hotter
Eliss Eli Is MoinsA, maa SSigarWN SS5Ies " pEK ~ Tor,
II1a n, H. d peitG' RGo0S' john Mc6alonEh'' I1'
Samuel j. Jones, Jr., Edward Armstrong,
John w. HinR g, Adam Hill, ~
Edward s. DE d. j. b. De Haven,
Charles A. Miller James Davenport, Jr.,
w, Edward Rowen, q. Rising,
Jemes ~ Matt, Abraham Gill,
Samuel s. Money, 3. o. Huckel
Tbemas F Hamilton and Elias Iomax, two of the
above petitioners named In she foregoing petition.
SsDg Sn eecos OF The city o se aeS as
mat he facts stated in the foregoing petition are
"ue 10 Tue O'''O no. THog2s % H2MILjToN,
ELIAS LOMAX.
sworn and subscribed before nae this 18th day of
october, 1867. SAMUEL P. JONES, ,JR,. Alderman
The petitions in the other cases In the same
The CouEL ordered the petitions to be filed, and
tinued the matter @ @1nsH October 81 ..ul ,,o.. -,
Thompson.-The following Judgments were given-
Wetheril VS.. Croasdale. Rule 70 show cause why
Harrison vs. Mcdonald, An application Tor an in
junction to restrain defendant from blocking up
Almond street wharf. Before repoped. Injunction
Asn Y. White. Mastegs report 50 far set aside
UNITED sTArEs DISTRICT ooURT-Judge Cad
The United States vs. spirits. etc. David HaeRaFty
for alleged violation OF the Revenue laws The Dis.
n lc a o be aSe1 S o M hsy We're unable make
fore verdict for the claimant was takenl
The United states VS.. % barrels OF Whisky, etc.
Christian Preisendantz claimant An Information
for the forfeiture OF property for an alleged violation
the business of recfyng and wholesale liquor dealer
at New Market and Noble Streets IL was alleged that
his place visited and looked into by the United
States Inspector last January, and that II disco
vered that his returns OF the amount OF liquors. and
the persons from whom they were purchased, were
false. that there were in hs possession packages Of
liquor improperly marked, and lhat he hed no license
Tor carrying on the business he was engaged In. All
which, Il was stated were causes OF forfeiture. On
trial. Earle and White for claimant
COURT OF QUARTER sIeSSIoNS-Judge Lud-
| lGw-T. b. Dwight Assistant District Attorney.-In
the case Of the VS. JessPn
jury rendered verdict Of guilty ,,no, ~.
John l.. Richards was charged VIII moet Inc ale
ChnToh al the corner al Twelfth and Elbert Streets
wrote number OF letters 70 sccns1s b laws; ~ Lfee-
estIy SppTopTiatng his own use the money Of the
hs & sSS e his sSSuSDs S
MitcbeiI ana O'Netil for the Commonwealth; Briggs
for defendsn"