The national Republican., 1867-12-20
THE COURTS,

arsuss .ss. eIss me va! Say s.pmss :. A. bad
Y !: :s; ~:
T Jsss.$Sis wi ..is M. Ne seSr, .,a ys!,d ~.
pisintld. YET Il chs preventive measures taken ibe
ma sisass ss'sSifS ssaa si s s'sss sssa
NJ, Bradley eoniiss,S e.sminIns the eridsnee in
ss!sil. and ihs,tins tha! a'es Il hs Jury thoSsht
s:ins,sd on &c Sss: q lie pai%Hs: sr.i sisiS
might Be- s%sndssis q De ely law. but would sti
Sr & s,ss indicted srsss s. Ss isi and
sss u ss snS q S q: Tssf
then ,r; !. Il "a "a, s;saS \. ne
sssia 4 Esns' ;:,;s 'Sis S4si e. Ssss ,n.
Rspieyin to gscovsr goods levied By oaesr staus
sdlsy sy % %. q :ss sSi y
Dsns si.s that the % X, sSs sS sSsS ,sn
sS ss,,s,.l s,ss re- &. gZ:.., rnS 4.
By q s 4: s ~
sna ss Il: ss ES ssa
ai.o stated Judges Cartier sod Din had admitted
wives % testify in cases where their husbands were
juage said that, thossh hi, own tended
M M g Y. jssss: SSala '''
foundation was deb, q esSt doiisrs and tS.rsapoa
the case was summarily dismissed for want Of juris
10 Iohn Bratherlinevs. Samuel Wilson. Bradley.
This Is an action to recover alleged profits growing
out q contract for tho delivery Of horses TO The Cow
The case was not concluded, when, a, o'clock. the
court sdjourned until this morning.
CRIMINAL CcpRr..4Jadge Fisher.--The time Of
sSs, H. sssa sg;s .sns 4
Sss Ss , Ss S
Ss.Ii;S: Larceny. NH. SsI,. @ srs:.
RoSsr MsSes. t~o % casc, q % ssapt Sip and batter,
gpoa Jane. y. barnes gu the iiih or October IS.t.
S,Ts. sEsTs H. S a.
e% .ius Ief many months past sosorai siyii sulss.
asSss Alleged sss rsssSa
at the time Of the assault paper very offensive 10 hiu
BsrnSs w isttci struck hin. and % ihsa % begun the
The testimony sohaIeed on several points. and at
act q Congress he ease ended tSefe and Inc holding
h% o FsSsT sIS ssa %si Sn Il ru. . when
statute must BE- construed strictly. This act Of Con-
:asi. and Sstsss: Sf and asfsy.. ssInE iSs IHssi,
a,s. naa, igsdstS1 IN @ :ssh fs,e: s Ba, he act Of
SS4s = ssss9s s9s.asS sey aseoldaa e m
hs % es. spsn sn the
under which the statute conferred tho Jurisdiction had
Now, The terms o. the statute gave magistrates iu-
risdiefon in those cases only where party had made
SIR SPeR s.aoS a. RSs tsra com had s legal
nissanos, ara meant A. aidsyi, q cause q sstiSn
and sas he anas
the s sS n% s1S SSa he ws & z NJ
MsGsS and ss,s nc sH T. impose hno
upGa 1S%i N%fr,. ns eseep,ed mp 10 the guiina
NJ, Norris ssfss he ioiiswiss nstrge,iOn: 'If the
witness. Barnes struck the nrst blow they must ae
The judge said he could grant the prayer this form
II III. jury hsys reasonable doubt AZ to who made
that the nsoent snatehina Of . paper might be con-
''SiTof NJ ao9r: or fshs' ssa an exception to this ruling
Ths @ wSfs Fysn r. ns ary p SeG % S ,osns ony
II tss second with recommendation to the favor Of
u5sa iI H. H, d. Mslfsr,t IN GsorsetcSn Browns for
prosecdtichi Thomas Wilson for defence. Verdict
Henry Brcwn-Laresnyi. Verdict not guilty,
Lucinda johnson for kecfins bswdy house.
The Court then adjourned until this mornins.
l s.G sstsS; .s
Of LSssians a1d John sn r5%bs ,y st % sa sPd
co pnselloIs Of this court.
cS @y y aAsi sP'FSS FSs m SySF 81 az
cause va. sSp,inaed ey NJ Mors, q sSan1sI % .9I ,he
NO %SS. - The Galena. Dubuque, gunleith and MIN;
Ss S;IsS Rest fasi f,sa$ asRss &C. vas
spssd sSd e On niF A.
assSass,s sg stst, ssSs and d.rq,
-haaddmusa,Is AZ Osie.na! er ar zsIf..
Il ssSsf
yi.9r: q johnson county, Iowa: The Sels.oE Med
I yss. ss s :s s:sS
with PaSs the sn. 5:'i S
@ SGsSsnt upon % H. coupons S @ far saa sssss
s Ds%s hs
est on thS bonds was due and unpaid Inc ~. .,,, =,
81 DSs mss ~ s the payment
The board returned to tho alternative writ, among
% VIZ q s Tf
hey made csn
fRa sya
al ne
still remained In force; ,
Second because. the proceeding in that court was
SssSP aRG nS dSsfiS s'f
proecedings Third. Because the State court had NO
cess Of this COURT by writ Of to collect this
judgment. Fourth. Because the decree set up was
The Court oyerruled the demurrer, and the cause
thence comes here, the plaintiff In error insisting that
the power Of the United States Court to issue writ Of
mAndamus to compel the levy Of q tax to pay judg-
ment Is vested In IL by reason Of the jurisdietion ae
Sted aeauired 81 ne writ Issli The iqrisdistiOn
Of the court Is not exhausted by the rendition Of the
judgment, but continues until the judgment Is salts
fed. Many questions arise on process subsequent 70
the Judgment In which jurisdctiou Is TO be exercised
ThS DpncSn n set % w by thS sTperyi;Srs attained
hs recovery. The insurance OF II after the recovery
Of the Judgment Is no bar to the writ OF mar damuB.
The remedy by mandamus Is the process to enforce
the Judgment for the plaintiff issues, not 70 give
Quired No State can control the exercise Of an au
thoTity under the Federal Government. No State
court has any authority or jurisdiction 10 enjoin
Judgment OF tie Circuit Court Of the United statos
ordinate Jurisdiction restrain the proceedings Of
other court Of the same jurisdiction. The process Of
State court Judge has authority beyond the limits
Of the soyeTei ignty which confers the judicial power
The defendants In error maintain the following
propositions: In questions such presented, the Fed
In courts Of concurrent jursdicton tho decree and
judgment Of that court hrst obtaining Jurisdiction,
shall take precedence. proceeding by mdnddmms
is an ordinary action, independent, and not auki
to proceeding therein to act in violation Of The
order Of another court and viii ich would subject him
to punishment therein. Francis Fellows, J. Grant,
y. A. Dick, and Montgomery Blair for plaintiff In
error; faiTall Bool, 4; N. Strong, Hon, Charles