Delaware tribune. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1867-1877, 1867-05-02

U. ). DISTRICT COURT-Judge HdW.-Thc adj
journed Session of the U. s. District Court COM
menced on Monday. in this civ. nj 10 o'clock.
Tn tho o,so oro;,s, III, ond IT.,,os oon,;o,oa
nj last soss;nn % oons.iroo,, 90 a's.od A., c.,
~ - " W VI.
o'n''er'' '"s "isunen. VI eounse' VI 'he lio.iou
lor new 'rlai, was hcard. benJainin Nields,
Esq, ior inc defence, argued on behalf OF the
motion, and 5. NJ. Harrington, ESQ.,, on behalf of
the Government, opposed it. At 3 o'clock Judge
Hall announced his decision. oyerrullpg the mo-
ton. and the prisoner was remanded for sentence
The cose of limited stotes 10 w n n pouIson
,vos ,hor to,,on nm md a i,,r,, ;r,n,no,ad
''s sa W "na ~ 'lipae"'
'o,e sHso'oN.
'aee VI - - V'' W. - = ivu,son, was re-
s'"~'' anu 'u,.i", nssees "eie euneu ING esr
80, ., ''. rs w. " oAe" '"a' "o nau W
",',s'.,' ny ,,, ~. n,' anu a''oi W"'us
$3.50. =, y" ~ ,,as naa 'o'N pap,, p'i
~, ~ '''s',
~ sa, ,,a atI !, 'no a,sene, anu
A.s ~ .''s '-'. e" ""s s'As' anu 'A' p''sns'
hau rauuuieh'iy optaineu TWO uiscnarges' put iur-
liner examination sa',shea MN that was forgery
w.. ou AZ, v nav soiu ii anu " whom
hsa as,o.s,s So soa ~. =. ~, s,". oaao
we're all called mn and corrohora,e pou,sons connec
tion with the affair.
Mr. Bird counsel for the prisoner made an elaborate
and ingenious defence, and Mr. Booth very ably rep
resented the United States The Court summed up
decidedly against the prisoner There was decided
uherence Vi opinion a.rins tue 'ria concerning 'ne
o,,aa s T. VI N, Vr m ~ .nv Witnesses mr. ooo'
mot h.on srr,roned NJ n .a,d ha "p haS 'a,,aad
the Clerk of the Court to subpnpa Mr. Jeandell and
the Clerk said he had subpenaed Iall Mr. Booth had
ordered him TO- but had not subpenaed Mr.Jeandell.
MIR. Booth asked to have Mr.. Jeandel Summoned.
and Mr.. George W. Vernon stated that Mr.. Jeandell
was not In Town. that nc mad gone out In the country
rue suppeona was issued howeVer' ana 'eandeli
'p T,,a ,. - .',,s,s a ,, .
o,ah,o on,,h Of ,,,na =, ,, vor,,. :, aa,,,u
Mr.. Bird asked to have the ,Jurv nood and The
Clerk comped when. to the sururise Of ali. one of
the jury said that he only considered tho prisoner
guilty of the last CHARGE neaning the charge to de-
fraud the Government, we SUPPOSE and another re-
fused to acknowledge the verdict as his. The Jury
were tent back to deliberate ur'her' and the cour
a'.o'rnea ssali un'i, . cioeA.
,,os,ars., .c,a..oa., -, -. VI
,,n,an, l., ,,.o os.. os wy ~ n 49,, '', ,, ~
~, rove ,,or,,,, -, o..,, aet,,a $780,. ,,,...N
,Tha,, s,rnd A., ,,,so,,o. ,,,;,, ~ ~,
,.s ',., 80 y. Wy ,n',..,lens
,,,,,.s, W ".'n ,-en, w u0,'"u.
,.a h,,-,' ,,.e,s.'.ss Az ''.u ,o'u
-. o's y. VIZ iAa'.'
-. ~. - T -. ~. -s''' ".'A i'''en' "
-, - d., r..
rd,on,ont . ~ ,hnoa rn"',a 'Noo' - a''e'' u
r.. Any,, ~ 80 s.o"i1''
oo,,,,a,.a ~ ""'en o.i,on 20
yoor 1904 u,,,;o,, s,a,,,,s T. .a''',sas 49,, wv
ro,a a.,1 hoo,, no,,.,,as ~, 'n1ec nu'i anu
na.saa ~ ,,,o ,..sI ,sea y "' u 0'"s''e'
oooan'1 1hst ,,,a i,,.,, J., e,.,
,,ar ,,,,,,,,, ,s ,,,.... La. -.
ho,t woa,o,s,s ,,a, .t, oa..o. as.'"s a.
1,..,.-, - '"e
ohii'cu ou'tes' that inc ohehce 10 u state ohence
and this Court a U. s. Court has no cognizance
Oh IT. ana mas no authority to pass sentence on
the prisoner.
1htrd. That the document said to have been
forged would not have been valid for the purpo-
SEES sought, even II 1t had been genuine.
Messfs' Booth Tor the U. ). and Bird for the
prisoner VIII argue this motion to-day.
This morning the motion In arrest of judgment
made by b. Nields, ESQ., counsel for Manlove E.
Hayes convicted of charge of defraudng the
Government, was argued by s. NJ. Harrington,
hsq',ior U. Sand b. Nields, Esq, for prisoner.
Inc ground OF The motion is that the offence
was committed since the war, and that the act
uhaer winch the Indictment was drawn expired
W ms own limitation win the close OF the war.
Inc arguments OF inc counsel on the motions
IN arrest OF Judgement In the cases OF Hayes and
rouison occupied the time OF the court until Its
adjournment at abeut one O'Clock this afternoon.
Inc court was then adjourned until four O'Clock,
when we presume the decision of the Judge in
the cases will be rendered.
we believe this is the only business now before
the court and suppose that after such decisions
shall have been made, and, in case the motions in
arrest OF judgement do not prevail, sentence shall
"esddys Commercial
KENT County CouRrs.-Thc Delawarean says
the following cases were tried during the first four