The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-12-10
LEGAL INPELLIGENcE.
The Libel Oase-Mann We. Meessr.

COURT OF QUARTER sEssIoNs--Judge Brew
s E .as Ssss & 81 e VS. Of SeS
70 cOngregete in the Court House interest being
Mr. Brown. for the defendant, asked the Court to
that he had sickness Ia his family and had not had
SSt hye nSpTs Ss sseP & three nights He had no
Of the Court He didn't do e for the purpose OF delay
for delay. ~. :
the matter s very plain and besides that, the
ansus S ana has q SSd
nas s1 has sU M T a hSye apd 5% q 6s
for trial, and it was understood when the case was
9fs % atH @ %
nienee While would be glad to extend ali possible
combined show why the case should go on.
J sd % rely a Ss @ urged
burden OF proof was upon Mr.. Mann" was no rea.on
two be occupied 10 this different posi-
humber Of people that have SspIisd to this ooars
for Irial and they have been Obliged TO- come here
physical inability had been assigned by as
Rs h Us 's Be Ss
poned until tomorrow, or the day after. Hewas free
me case would not be pressed for trial. Mr. Brown;
hoped that under the circumstances Of his being very
Judge Brewster said his own personal lncnaJlons
81 sss S 10 s1 d
he was unwe but the rule Of Court was very strict,
Court he had nothing bus the rule to guide him. He
WAS sorry tnAb cOuuBei COul0 not agree as
was be done in the The rae Of the Co1r de.
clsred that Il was not sufficient ground for
The empRneling OF aJury was then commenced.
THE JURY.
The following were Called r.H
l. John PiRgot residing on Filth street, In the Fih
Ward. Not challenged.
2. stephen Coleman. residing No. S52 shackamAxon
"a g. Wntsm :: Hs@@ilI residing in Adams Row,
THONGS st SoeIhTan residiog No. 1872 Richmond
5. Isaac May. residing No. 222 Brown street. ChaI-
iengeo put subsequently SUBS Piseed IN tne i box. -.
Bridesburg. Not challenged. wv
ne aS resd Ie a.cs g az ro @ S + Nsth street
supposed IL 70 be Mr.. Mann. NotwithstandInR that
the evidence. Challenged but not sustained. "A "
8, Isaee Marshall residing No. 4s7 Girard avenue.
% Charles Taylor, residing No. lA9 Huston street.
10 Barclay Brown residing In Byberry II wsuty-third
Ward ne had formed an opinion as 70 the guilt or
slate what u was lie would feel bound to decids by
the evidence, but would rather be excused. Chal-
u. Joseph NJ Truman, residing No. ss9 and s4i
opinion as 20 the guilt or innocence Of The def
read nor dld not know IN Wa az paper it pub
Objected 10. but withdrawn.
Al don't know who the defendant is at all. Not
y. Stephen sneIder. residing near the Foxchase.
Tstnty,third Ward. Challenged on account OF resi-
IS George Kstes' residing at No. sos Race street.
guilt or innocence OF the defendant. He had read
pOItisn OF the article last evening Not challenged.
IA; Robert otter, residing No; ne Christian street
He had formed an opinion as TO the guilt innocence
OF the defendant he had read the article complained
Of He could not II he was sworn as n juror decide
the case without bias for against the prisoner
Challenged, and challenge sustained.
10, solomon Redelsheimer, residing No. sSl Mar
i6. William RepoH residing No. lO7 North Sixth
etl eet
He had not formed or expressed an opinion as to
the guilt innocence OF the defend he had read
portion OF the article In a German paper. Not ohal-
FENCED.
1hc mas Cochran, who had taken seat In the box
was challenged by the Commonwealth
is. William BTegler, Sr., residing Rt No. 1913 N.
Fourth street. Not OF alenged.
Isaac May, who had taken q seat In the box,
challenged by the defendant. -
Francis Jordan, residing No. lOlS Arch street. He
had formed an opinion as 20 whom the article re-
erTed; be could decide the case according the evil
dence. Challenged, but not sustained.
Thompson Irwin who had taken u seat In the box
Was challenged by the defendant
Caleb Walk er, residing Nc. 900 ounce street. He
had formed or expressed opinion the guilt OF
innocence Of the prisoner he had not read the article
or heard read; he supposed u had reference TO Mr.
Mann from q conversation which he had had with
others believed he could decide the according
70 the evidence. Challenged, but not sustained.
Caleb Walker, WHO had taken q seat IN the box
Was challenged BY we dsienaanA