The Charleston daily news. [volume] (Charleston, S.C.) 1865-1873, 1867-05-28

..-,,. ~.p,,,CH, CHARLESTON, Al 7s;I:s] 4 :.
osomIoDnt non @ for felony Committed a-.in,l tbd law,
OF State or tho United Stntos, consequent on "a
conviction in tho courts, citllcr OF tho United
States DR. Of Stato or declared by tho LAWS 81
either, would DO fatal under thpse facts.;.!
works as 10 right or suiaso " tic
SS' e. e SS
Gs 1 my s Ses q. f
TO tTf1son against iho uted stos docs not declare what
I'm ss o 10 , on sNnyson Of treason That
blood shall not follow us consequence. any foreuro
dtI % Suusssss If. g. If @
susa OF Gs, s ot conviction
slaves owrcd by tho party and to dis%a,nsson
from holding any ofco under tho United stssce nm,
C h1, nSs o. any statute now In force in either
alsiranchisement ns y tho tight OF suffrage by iorco Of
EesheF The party arpy rtration must swear
tnat II have ntyrr becn member Of any Siato Icgs-
sssasa ~ Gf s Or in
non against the United States or iyen nh and comfort
Is R z. Gn @Smsass sssf 81 nny GE q .s
state to SUPPORT tho Constitution Of tho uniled st.ca
sfsS,Ss sssel,islE Etfa tarsSs TsF i4ss94ts . tie
Ihcse elauses Of the oath in cGOot e.ien
mont bovonG tho nroSsinns nj original net ami tho
prior el.usos Of thu ac sclt in tho iunortant particular
sn5s GT Of nor
tho fact OF Acknowledgement. 'a.'f|i S.'i:7- %
Of tho oath results frrn, matters IN tn But iS ono 10
er 'osS nc ssHssS limit tho generality of tho of.in.
n ssne SSs o1Sr
"sna Rs a oath Sy osc sn
afterwards participating IN tho rebellion asaint Tho
% ds. s% 70 sas sss' I % 1;ss, ass;
SlGs or oiieersaro eomnrehensda scco Whit meta
the Eno1 States giving aid and comfort to tho enc
ss H2so f ssss sers Fl !. o no
bes Of Gr cooarsss MSmScTS S STATE
question might however arise whcthcr convention hold
,So lot unlnR or anemenlmon OF fts consatq:s
IL S;sss FL ;$s
tpFe aro sapreay disiinsGi nom cash Other ti for,
ijoS sp ey Sss e same ssnsSa sts'o
r &lHnt the constitutional amendnnh IWhrn. ucn, in
tba asutc they must DO nndorssoo to nsu itin The
same sensG and aa distinguished from constitutional
passed what called drdinaces Of secession BY What
over % n, namo they may have been Called opinion
ISssIiR asss sns Ssl;ss d as
hs 9sa. Sas ;Hap5y who
judicial ofrer Of any State within he mesnns Of
clauses Various classos OF oioera ore here in.
Judicial as oeons nro mentioned Or
except mbmbcf OF tho satc Logisnturo or member Of
as g TO ohef aE src
I've and aa to Federal oscs tho teIms executive
officer of tho Unit satea, It has been shown that
so cra officers apd State onecrs elAaulncd simply In
mo clauses OF tho act under consideration. deem
proGta6le and conducive 70 n clear ordor 70 follow
Gs Iaasssasn ss siss rs sAs ssSs f S1ns
executive or judicial; this prasc is twice used I'D thcsc
taH sd sss@ ., sG snS
sed d saS a Ss 70 70
nthrrs; bestdes shd aah tcrna description used
Is e an 17s EtR' eosa @
S the ,s "A ,ss sseSn the
20 descriptions qsl judiDIsi .oaiccra Of
1G te.ms are 80 general and indefinite thst they
SST~ssstsa; ; Is %st.ss e @pss %Sct.snce tAss
pnfess % ifa nS, ssoa
uncertainty Nodos maifsst iutho appl aauahi Of the
w and The
gencFsllt5 &c law: esaaet b sea ss r.
daHa paHSaI III pg Ssposaon madS
SSsS5aas %siSs S Se Of S ss,aes g,
The law hAyS cfpoun cd to eItenl bat tn soufe hngs
sass sspS SHs Shss ~ psRs doing
ma to DO is and aoso which neuds every persoh i
the Ietmr mey iavo aiudged to- roach some persona
ing ho case and tho necessity OF Tho net and Comparing
ONO part with another nnd somg,imes by forcfn rcunid
decn proper hero 10 &c sornh Sen idoas
o. the general intent q these .cs and by what rule Of
sSnseh9 & atet or eSta that intent may best DO ar
e esSi sAs l pSS
"a s e "Si s Hasts o d.
sisi
this right Of sufag from tiose who hnvo always
The ruie Of to the clauses which give
Tho right must 20 liberal snd ss o,hsr nie GENERAL
ThiSa asrogn,' from the s.sng right hO rule q con-
th0n, With Tho inquiry yhether neers Of tho mini s ofe
State embraced within those tets deAcriptfof
aass ss GSS
s$ saafsa wda e as sas e ssss.
e TSnd Or have 81 tSo And
Hsy so es wien "a fa ss ssasn tss
oSnRrss. SsrS ois sse
sn E g Ss
gSisa R1S aSs 81 sass Snas
tsfen ~ e o Sne hea
States aha have ougased In insusreeionor Rebellion
tsa1 1sassss aiTsar This third .issHon % is e1. :;
tressiy Toforrcd to moro than once n these acts.
ie followed word forH word I'm these disauafyine
clauses fr possible except In the particular In
Stssa sse g Sas ss Rias Z Z KsSn S sas s
o sSs sas 5s gs ss s
=, IN sh: sSesa ss
fPs oo
1 g ss sss hss s Wien
Sso as a
law maker IN Jpnipg tho disqualiacatons OF voter
took bpeciaf conitance OF ts third SECTION or the
for the most part and rejecting defiYsrate
mtHt DO horHo ji iih TINT hero considorinu
fhs Of DilitaI qes.syho weresu i1or 70 the
game InlArJ otnee during be rebellion; TO thls las
onEs. they all come Under that othor c-use OF dsqua
hcnuon, W ich applies 10 participation In tho rebellion
Having the inquiry thus ereumscrbed 10 civil officers
tho question recurs what civil prfrs to DO brought
ssh.a qas IS Ss1s oss1s Of
EaSa4 "a hAtheR aAsNsSana sl&ak BGa1aiy known
by the proper description OF State officers officers
State In ons sonse and in popular sense, tho descrp-
tiDD, executive oflcera Of Blto is applicable well
kpo class tho Governor. eutelant oycrqor, State
who oIerso executive nneuona at the Of dovuh
am moi prepared Isy ibat OILY. sSoas proper siatc
olrils como wtthn this term OF dehcItpGaAinor an
description to judge Of Courts whose Jurisdiction cE
tends over tho United States muat content mybef III
saying Of these oors executive judicial that they
arc clearly yhn tho meaning OF tho law. Now. chang
ing tbe uQuIrY from an Affirmative 10 egudve pro-
cess such officers usually pass under Tho deecril.
Jual