Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1867-12-17

TRANSFERRED 1ESFERDA1.-Iuc ioiioW
ing transfers of real estate were left at the
Recorders Office on yesterday:
T.. Reese and wife to Peter Ealy, Dec
14th, 80 acres and 81 poles of land in Jeffer-
son township, for 5000.
Daniel Landon to Mordica Landon, Aug,
2lst, Is acres of land in Blendon township.
for $3.50.
Geo. II. Griswold and wife to Abel Hill
dreth, Dec. 14th, inlot No. in Mathew
Westerott's addition to the town of Wes-
terville, for $1,000.
W.B. Chenoworth to L. w. Sifert, May
25th, and lilo acres of land in Perry town.
ship. for $l54 25.
= Polly A.. Adams to William 81. DunniclS,
Sept. 14th, inlot No. in james Bryden's
second addition to the city of Columbus,
for $1,000.
John Robinson to W. 81. Dimmick, Dec.
I1th, lot No. 8 in John Rickly's addition
to the city of Columbus, for $4,000.
Bontell E. Allen to John Williams, Dec.
14th, part of lots Nos. Is and 10 of Latham's
addition to the city of Columbus, for 5000
John C. S. Miller and wife to John Will
liams, Dec. 14th, part of lots Nos. Is and Is
in Latham's addition to the city of Colum-
bus, for $500. f2t F.E.s5-fGFo
VIM. A. Platt and wife to John Abel,
June 9TH, lot No. 10S Of Sullivant's West
ern addition to the city of Columbus, for
$4,000.
Samuel Barr and wife to Joseph w.
Weaver, Feb. 2Sth, lot No. 8 in George
Sterner's addition to the town of Wester-
vile, for $1,000.
MD. Van Horn to M. w. Bliss ct al,
Nov. 11th, lots No. 1, 2 and 8, in the suit
division of VIM. Phelan's Mt. Pleasant ad-
dition to the city of Columbus, tor 81, ,2l5
Lafayette Lazell to r. P. Woodruff and
]. D. Henderson, Dec. 14th, lot No. in
Lazell's North addition to the city of c.
lumbus, for $1,000. ds,a
L. English and wife and B. F. Martin
and wife to Valentine Path, Aug. 26th, lot
No. 8 of the subdivision of English and
Martin of outlot No. 7S in the city of c..
lunbus, for $500.
Isaac Morgan and wife to Alexander
Davis, Aug. 3lst, five acres of land in
Washington township, for $500.
"How Is IT.""-The correspondent of {
Cincinnati paper in reply to an article pub
lished by us uses the following language:
{ "a local paper inquiries how it is that cor
respondents of Cincinnati papers are per-
mitted to publish from the annual reports
of State officers when Columbus papers ar
denied the privilege. 1t is not fact tina
Columbus papers are denied any privileges
that are accorded to correspondents, but !
is tact that two or three things are requi
site to get news here or elsewhere. Fo
such purpose it is particularly necessary
to know how to get it, and when to get 1t
and then, to have the requisite enterpris'
and diligence to get it; it Is in these essen
tials that the local papers are beaten, ant
they should not advertise their own de
feat"
AS Gov. Cox requested that no extract
from reports should be made until the re
ports were printed, and as the Columbu
papers have respected that request, ou
readers can understand the style of enter
prise necessary to secure those reports
The same kind of enterprise, was the caus
of this notice being published in Cincin
natl: t4--
"The Ristori troupe performed "Mar
| Stuart" to densely crowded house In 90
lumbus. on Saturday evening, and vii
give Elizabeth" this evening""
Our readers, especially those at the Oper
House on Saturday night, can readily un
derstand this sort of ''enterprise."