The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-12-18
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.

NIsI PRIUs-Judge Sherwood. - stockham VS..
Dock. An action of trover for the recovery OfA
Koliock, Administrator. vs. Koliock. An action en-
apromissory note and due bills. Verdict tor plaintiff,
B. L Hall va Henry y,Ts,. r CGoggshall. Verdict, by
Daniel Tiuamy vs. CIty of Philadelphia. Verdict
by agreement for plaintiff $500 subject to reserved
Thomas Robertson vs.. City of Philadelphia. This
through the alleged negligence of the defendants.
nursery and hot-house at the northwest corner Of
Twenty-fourth and Coates streets and the city gas
alleged that suce 1855 these pipes have been sadly out
0ea,e9 notess of the mHtter re-
sis enty neglected to mend and put them in order.
escaped Into the plaintiffs premises killed many
valuable plants, and rendered the air In the house
noxious that at times the plaintiff could not attend
properly to his business; whereby The injured to
the extent Of $4,000 which sumhe claims In damages
Osborn Conrad VS.. Marcus schamberger and Gus.
fendanis.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Judge
SoSn aSs Charged with pe1y In HSss swesrns Ts
falsely in this Court In regard to bis liability as BAIL
before reported, the jury rendered verdict Of
The United States VS.. Enoch A.. Neswanger. In
this cas- the defendant was charged with using an
Inspector brand and plate ana using counterfeit
brand ahd plate, with intent to detraud the Govern
meDt ,,,- ~.
danI IN 1866 and 1867, Revenue Inspector; and
In May, 1867, he WAS suspended from office.
stating sT % sSe fSaa
his office inspector the 29th OF May 1867, and
another man appointed in his stead.
that they knew the defendant to have been In
spectOr aud to have Inspected and marked liquor for
Patterson, Cole Co.. No. So N Second street. and for
testified that they knew him TO have inspe cted and
branded so late as August, 1867
Mr.. MeTshoT testified that he was appointed In
specIor the First District May 29. aud acted as
such from June 10, and that the defendant was his
Without proving anything further tn case for the
United states was closed. The defense offered no
evidence. The Court Instructed the jury that
proof had been made of notice 10 the defendant that
he hRu been suspended from office. their verdict
should be one ofacquittal. verdict not guilty.
COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONs-Judge Brew
sterThis morniDg was taken In the trial OF Isaac
Lassel and Samuel BrRddock the charge of con-
splracy to cheat and defraud Benjamin d. Johnson,
and Of making false pretenses In pursuance; and as
ary 1857 they copspred together for the purpose of
defrauding Mr.. johnson OF certain bank shares and
city bonds 10 him that Lassel lad obtained
a highly valuable patent right for an Invention known
as "1assel's Patent Luoricating OIL" and that Brad.
dock had bought this patent right from Lassel for
$40 600, for which receipt was given; and by these
And they did No AXE these representations to Mr..
Johnson and produced receipt for $4,000 from Las
sci BrRddock, given for this patent, and also
tain certificates OF the great value OF the patent and
These representations were all false, the patent
being utterly worthless the receipt was false, and
given just for this fraudulent purpose and the cerJn
Gates Of the value Of the patent we're false Al. And
was corrupt and unlawful.
Samuel BrRddock was on trial alone. On trial
COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONS-JUdge Brew.
ster.-This mornings session was taken up In the
rpon q charge OF seduction, In which the jury rem
dered q verdict or guilty.