The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-06-01
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.
wHAr coNsr1rurrs A rRApr.MARK?


Pleas Of New York for May 80. Judge DAILY gave an
Sewing Machine Company vs. Joseph W. Bartlett.
The facts are mainly as foows:-When Mr.; Gibbs In,
constructed his machine in the form of the Roman
trademark and the peculiar shape Of the machine
trade 8 m6Ol Alter these e machine; had m achieyed
machines Of the same form and, on account OF their
an extensive trade although they were alleged TO
vastly inferior in their working The consse]gpence ]
( Gibbs. on these facts Judge DAILY issued injqnc
iron SseRn pr shs d
vice. or symbol Of the compainants, described and
by said Gibbs and applied to the Wilcox & Gibbs sew
ing 6TT or PGd uR pcE 1MRes q es
-Miscellaneous business was before the Court: An
t9dy Of John Benners yho had been e held held by the
whose instance the application made Is about
eighteen years OF age ana Is said 10 oe OF ieeoe MIND
Of Lewis & Renners fruit 5erchants on south
Eastern shore @ Mary lana ~'AOO'et OA '"'l III
work and idle about the streets. The TWO uncles,
Messrs Lewis and Benners, took the afflicted boy TO
INTO their custody saying that he was an; gnmspage
streets but they said nothing whatever of his feeble
The evidence offered before the Court this morning
went to show that the young man was unjuslly re-
IeStes him m e @ W6e be E Was sng vn@ w b and U
had always acted as il he desrOus Of getting rid
everything for him to make him easy aud contented
and his aunt at Germantown particularly wished 10
The Court consented to discharge the young man
when this aunt should be produced aud would testify
The matter, therefore, went over until this lady
should come into the city.
The Commonwealth ex, rel, John Moore VS.. Sheriff.
This writ of habeas corpus, sued out for the dis
charge of Mr. Moore, who was bound over to answer
charge Of conspiracy and Of false pretensse 1sss
McCone of Williamsport came to him and said that
Mr.. Moore had leased certain valuable land at Titus
vile, upon which 1t was intended to form oil COM
pany The land he said, was rich In OIL Three leases
had already been made upon 1t, and wells were at
II was intended TO divide the whole into five shares
Induced to part With about 1880 at that time and fire.
quently afterwards called upon TO pay sums of
by and he received no information from the OIL wells
He inquired, and was told by Mr., Moore that by mis-
take tne same piece OF lana that ne leased had oeen
He afterwards found out that the wells
and was never ascertained that Moore had leased
Afier this Moore went to Mr. King and stated that
he was a litle embarrassed, and was in want OF a
thousand dollars. He asked Mr. King to let him
have exte nsiOn note of s2400, which would
Mr. King let him have the note upon a promise that
became due; however Mr.. Moore did not pay IT, but
ne contlnually oIerea excuses and made promises
and sued Mr.. King upon the note.
held by the Court TO be barred by the statute of mI
tatons and the case Of false pretense as presented
the e.ndaa %as are esA ue ana
James Peto, convicted of a charge OF the commits
sion OF an outrage upon the person OF child was
Pententiary.
DISTRICT CoURT-Judge stroud.-Parker vs.
Smith, An action of debt and tort. On trial. Edrich
for plaintiff; Thomas Powell for defendant.
COURT OF COMMON Pl.EAS-Judges Ludlow and
Pielce.-Iillotson VS.; Miller. Equity Motion TO
entering security as before
Local Express Company vs. Carriers, Express Com;
by each party. opinion by Ludlow, j.