The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-06-08

and 1915 or under the act OF 1885, matters but little
provides that il no real or personal es tights and
credits e OF such husband can be found wherewth pro
lawful and tor the said Court to order the payment
o @ the R @ and To b Sa Feos
ing & the defendant 70 give security for the perform.
Jail II viii be perceived that the act OF 1872 in this
The only property seized or claimed to have been
eSed undeF the wsrrSp was the
ntei est In and 30 the stock Of merchandise stores
s, Brown & Co. valued at s2S,6oc In the afdaVit OF
he seTyee r Of the warrant Of seizure made by he
was Informed that the interest Of SAID defendant
amopnted TO $4,000, without saying by whom ne was
1.-THE proceeding had rested here It would have
to have filed nterrogatorles TO the garnishees TO
the property alleged TO have been attached. But
b TS1g for tns the defendant N & cane In a.
David S. Brown & Co.. without objection by the
fTm and that instead OF tbe rm being Indebted s to
him, he was indebted to the hrm some two or three
thousand dollars, This. therefore, brought she de.
fendan within the provision of the act of 1872
1t might make by requiring security for the mainte
nance of the wife, II he were liable therefor.
fendsnt separated himself from his wife without
Of he rs b Te marriage
took place February 22 lsse, and the rartes lived
wife complained not Of the conduct of the husband,
ssterwho lived with them and other members of the
Her general complaint was that her husband did
not compel them TO treat her with respect and cour
da4gheT was dispisased that her father had brought
home anoher wife; the sister was also dls9iiected
long while united with the other members of the
@ he herr her sas t ea IN her herr
eyes 20 try and change things; and that to obtain re-
visit her friends where she remained until the 10th of
on cross examination the complainant could not
specify any pSrcu%Sa liar word Or act said Or done by the
ness to her except some few matters Of dsrespect on
renee in families. All Of the persons OF whom She
that they had always treated her kindly ana with
DR.. Duhring her physician, testified that he at
month after her marriage, and that he found her in
bie Il was confused and debitate In the high
second marriage. on her return from the country 10
October her 9and met neT a. Jersey 0lty and and
II his sister had left the house, ,
James, you cannot expect me to return home" To
which he made no reply but & covered @ his ia face with M
two hours On the arrival of the cars they met
Prostitution carriage was OBJ aimed, and she was
& az Hes ss wG % 10 he o n
The defendant returned to his home, where his
family were awaiting their return, alone detected,
Saq er more 6p ess re al
quentiy visited her. without offering return to her
she caied on her husband and desired to Return She
March, 1857, and again offered 70 return home.
Her testimony respecting this interview as fol-
| lows:-I said to my husband, / had been home
two weeks before, and had come again, aud would
band and treatment received from his family I had
back to take all the discomors OF the house.
e anaPpy as
70 use to 6as
pssted on remSialng He again tod me we could
never live together again that il was not worth while
said:-"James. this is my home. IL is the home you
S%e Tnsn s lie sSyS 10
i've %e 1 IS not ten so ge m y no k
! is oonoxious to you in this my own house will
eGHre @ % to do ANYTHING n S Ike that's He also SAID
upon remaining until % he you'd PrSviSde', S me with
comfortable # would emain there. replied could
not be more unhappy or more uncSmforta5le @ than
me with means or home. BE said he would
Sae me said Will re@an until you @ IG tell me; 90 life Is
a. IL prefer yPI would Put i on
MOI pI! i on paper saiG Will YOU promise me NAV
e w
to see meI then said-"Harry. my husba has lite
missed TO get me a home in few days, but would not
GS not Sb sir and he SAID ID MN Te Ga ss
so" then left with my son. He has done nothing
The evidence also showed that the defendant in all
ed hes hSd hsd an SHq ec
that justified the complainant in leaving her husband
dna she MAS IN hg9y nervous G and sensitive con
the nerves, Is evident. But the evidence does not
family % jSstfed her in Withdrawing from her T homc ne
She was undoubtedly unhappy there, and her con.
change of scene; but this appears TO have been the
10 Which she was s6bjecteG Or # il We're anEiad
even III extent alleged by her did not justify
her in Withdrawing from the society and home OF her
husband.
The reasonable cause which would justify wife in
| abandoning her husband must be such as would en-
title her to a divorce, and that is defined by the
O DarDarOuS az
endangers her ltfe or the offer OF such ndignes to
her person as To render her condition intoerable and
life burdensome. Cattson Cattison. 10 Harris 275;
! EshbAck VS.. EshbAck IL Harris, S43 Butler But
The married relation, like all the other relations of
lie, has ITS trials as well as It's Joys, aud should be
sion, and submission to Disappointment With these
qualifications it is the happest condition of human
Trials must be endured and they are half conquered
| when they are borne with wise and patient for
II the case rested upon the withdrawal of the wife
from me hepse % 9I se onS se Gr he &c causes as
that the defendant was not entitled to have order
But the vile sought to return to her duty III her con
duct amounted 10 deserton OF her husband, she did
| Assembly to entItle him 10 divorce. Wv "
From the time she offered % return to him aud h n
wilmly and malicously. but With his consent and by
his command In the language of the wife. he turned
| her nom her home. He told her that they could
never live toEethsr again. that it was NOT worth while
| tu undertake it.
Refusing to receive wife was held In Nc Dermotts
| doeTs within the meaning Of our statute And in
| Groves Appeal, Wright, 4iS such refusal was held
II is further eontended behalf OF the defendant,
that he s not liable In this proceeding for mainte
she is not charge on the city. In Sterling VS.. the
commonwealth, Grant, lG2, the Court said: Having
charge; Having made no provision, he cannot c3m- (t
ths tne lSW steps n to compel MN % 70 6ss9 e9 the