The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-11-11

.
up that Afier the property was placed In planfs
snT 70. sale psS SssS PIoD % h u Ss o5dss S z.
went on and bought the property from another party,
veS vSTRr TRs 'eG oF hcl5 665 Juaee PH El1 Allison
OF S hs Rs5SEs TegSE.ed 0n Pe1c sT@
Charles stewart and Jacob Btler were convicted Of
at 5 IS Sae sFeep ns spefS e oSs
testified that on last Tuesday night week ago he
Garden, and they both resisted with blows.
m opEns 70 wFf sred w. VIII aS e
ego. Mr., Hin testified he took the money ofthe
down, leaving the defendant and several others in
one his s ESse pSn Sna SSSp ie m $
the defendant standing before him. and Immediately
he swoke he found his mcney was @ gone THOSE Who
We oo m my Tn ne o wnsn he e
sSS. RSi say 1t was he who robbed him. Verdict not
vote Of y qualified voter: =.
zen & &SskeT and , had resided At NO 1908 Warn9ck
at the poll Of The Fourth Division Of the fwentiet6
Ward; on last election day he went TO this poll to
vote was mot received; he went home, brought back
tax receipi mis- vote then challenged and the de-
fend ant refused to receive It.
the name on t6e tax receipt was John D. Myers and
ihe name on his naturalization certificate was John
The inspectors clerk testified that when the vote
pTiety OF admitting ii account OF the difference
6etws' the name on the list and that under
mtted o to Ihe inspection Judge, and he decided to
decision.
The defendant was inspector at the same poll. On
Liability ofthe National Banks to state
TsxatiOn - Decision In the Supreme
Court.
In the Supreme Court yesterday an opinion was
read by Judge Read In the case Of City Of Pitsburg
Of the liability Of national banks to State taxation
vas involved; THIS case came before the hes supreme
county the original action being brought by the city
SesIed upon the bsnf under the act Of %ssem6y S
Il his opinion Justice Read recltes the provisions OF
were established, and the rights and privileges
Involving the same questions made in the supreme
Court Of the United States and by supreme Courts Of
States had no right TO tax or interfere with national
In the before the first argumentw at Pitts
burg on :he 2sd Of October 1885 before four JUDGES
PhIiadeipnia on the 18th Of February 1867 In this
o
settle the Gnestop oon9rmty ST1 ws9 the tRe
Years Uas ago pAiI In Van Alien The Assessors,
act ra'f Of 5unt a. iss4 Eighty s%ns.rHes subjects he
and in the han dis OF s6arehoders to taxation by the
States under certain set forth in the ist
tiona The effect Of this decision is that taxation by
that excepted by the act itself unconstitutlona
THE over Of taxation under the Constit ution,n
repeatedly recognized In adjudged this Court,
are the Exclusion Of the States from the taxation Of
the means and instruments employed In the exercise
national banks are recognized In the % opinions OF
means and instrgments employed in the exercise Of
srss ase Spf ~ to the e
assison vas Sir@sd NE by the Psogls VS. Com M.
Legislature passed net to enable the city OF Pitts
which the Councils of said city were empowered ITO
levy assess and collect for the OF the city,
per dollar on the average quarterly business Of all
banks, banking institutions on the average quar-
eRsreSs S4d eiesraph oo%PS
MES dPing 5Ssi mess & in SAID CITY,"
pay said tax then the Treasurer of the city levy
Constable UNDER ri sse b @ easTae Msea
BY an ordinance Of said city tax was assessed upon
tulions doing business In said city, and the tax
Si467 81. without stopping TO show that the act Of
1859 never could have contemplated National Bank,
ward constable would be singular mode of treating
il would be sufficient say that this tax is not Within
the terms Of the 4lst section for IL is not the
clear upon principle authority says Justice
City Bank VS. f6e City Of PitsburS t6at ts this IS
when cannot be Imposed by the State directly or
defendants; national Institution Incorporated under
II therefore. this bank be considered as embraced
by the provs ons Of the ac OF 1852 then this "a Is un
the trade and business Of the institution, which the
the exercise OF the functions of the Federal Govern
In concluding. Justice Read says-"This is q very
large and IN s s n SsarngS q
if exposed to unlimited State taxation, might be
Ss Saa S ssy GesfOyed All the sStRo
Se pteSen SnG one 70 be unconsuona Jndsmens
affirmed. Judge Thompson dissents. - PiasblrO
Markets by Telegraph.