The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-05-31
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.

walader-The United States Two Copper Stills
and other articles, Edw Marley clai mant An infor-
NATION OF the seizure OF goods alleged 70 have been
without the payment OF the special tax. The claimant
offered no evidence odlsprove these aegations and
therefore, the jury rendered verdict for the United
The United states vs. Whisky, James johnson
claimant. An Information Of the seizure of goods tor
violation OF me revenue laws; No evidence on the
B1sHTs REAL ESTATE VENDORS AND BROKERS.
SUPRI ME COURE-A mere advertising of
properly oE real es!a broker dee3 nor enLitie him
mediate ana eftci. Mt cause OF the sale.
sent person, no Afterwards purchase it, see IT,
and The person t9en informed the broker that di
nerGn wassndueed by r 0tnsr ,ersons to 60 agtiq 70
broker was e. il,led 10 Il com Mission.
carp VS.; GuInmins Error to District Court Of Phlla
delpla. W. Hei Ty sutton, Esq, counsel for plantn
in error. The opinion of the supreme Court was de
Judge below stated the rule Of law too broadly in say
ing 1t is the so business of the real estate broker
Sere seeing q i Que property5 in the estaoEuS Of
Vded sale takas ' place la eonseqaeHce shsreo
TOO broadly mean ior the facts p this case be-
s ef eysenSe called was to hat in that eonSyS yet
purchass. aud all negotiations for sale were aban.
finally made until other parties again brought the
ery TO his notice and then Young. the purchaser,
advertisements, but by OF this renewed recon-
how he bought. in consequence Of what cause, Young
MS % saa ali
making this purchases dOn't know him In
transaction; he had nothing to do with the purchase
nov real estate broker is the agent of the vendor
There must be an employment emp to constitute him an
he the efcie cause the sale II a mere
OF The property TO the notice 0l the buyer effects the
Iisement any other service is enough if It be the
Ihe services OF the broker whatever they may be,
fail to accomplish a SALE and several months alter
nduced by other persons TO reconsider his resolution
and then max es the purchase as the consequence OF
sin hA
has right to commission. In certain sense It may
OF OF the Brokers' @ But for that lRe Pnr
chaser may never have looked at the properly. nor
entertained thought OF buying IL; but the evidence
in the shows that 1t was remote cause, that 1t
due TO another distinct and separate that
T. was a mistake TO permit the broker to recover
eyide nee was believed, he ala not cause the sale.
OF the SALE and the regards only proxi
mate and not remote causes In the language OF Lord
Of the causes and then imppsions one Of another
cause and judgeh OF acts by That without looking to
any further degree, In Ju'd non rehota cdusa sed
here is nothing the cited in the argument,
o SeeVe S G ease SSTs eeG S Shie sd % S sH sg
opinions always should be viewed no: as abstractions
awarded.
PJ.-T b. Dwight, Assistant District Attorney.
The COMMENCEMENT Al; VS. Mrs AmoIer In THIS case
charged with assault and battery upon Ellen
middle age of lile and OF respectable appearance.
The prosecutrx. Ellen Wey, is mere child; Of hum
BILE parents, and was living with Mrs Amber In the
capacity OF a servant.
Itwas alleged, on the part of the Commonwealth,
that many da,S when this little girl and the de.
fendant were alone In the house, Mrs. Ambler would
get violently angry from little would
against the floor and walls, would pull whole tufts of
hair from her head would force assaiedita and other
unpleasant things into her mouth and test the virtue
of variety OF novel and ingenious modes or torture
upon her delicate litbs5 body This continued for
time, when one very fine mornlng very touching
plying stout switch to the little girls shoulders and
sending her away.
Against this uncorroborated but fearful statement
defense offered testimony 20 Mrs. Amblers
good character for peace and good order, showing
how mighty improbable IL was to suppose good, re-
crime: ard also evidence to prove that the lit tie girl
was malicious and evil disposed. and en- irely unre
li BILE, especially In such case. On trial, BROOKE
| and O'Neil for defendant.
| DISTRICT COURT-Judge Stroud - Edwin A.
| Thomas GLADDEN. & Easton. An action TO recover
damages for injury sustained IN being illegally turned
out OF Ger ain premises Verdict for plainih, $3.50
Jacob Schmaunk Henry Fitzpatrick. An action
TO recover damages for alleged breach of contract IL
was alleged that defendant agreed TO construct
ovens and back building upon certain premises and
| failed to finish the work On trial.
| DISTRICT COURT-Judge Hare. Thomas O.
| Walter Palairet, Richard T. Paairet, and ]. q.
Booty Trustees etc., VS.. George w. Painter, admins-
William Mayer VS.. Zachariah Batdorf, and TO
damages TO O. A. q A. NJ. Seltzer. An action
TO test the business connection of Mr. Batdor with
q. A. q A, NJ Sezer, and TO prove his liability to