The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1867-07-10

before and since this trial; wness would MOE Ike Il
s h, oss u Ss ress Is ". man as
policeman, detective when witness nrst knew hint
:.ss I. s.: S Ssis IL
would mot believe bis ssinosy witness has met h oiss.
heard .ass %aa id not Ssess S% 90 Ii: oath
ss;rssa S.sla ss:ss:.
iron & va Il. % n asn u
reputation from 1862 70 lss since tha. have hsown him
OF truth from what persons have said Of hs rspu
By Mr. OVERWHELMINGLY cannot remember the names
OF those whom witness. has heard speak unfayaby Of his
member positively would = M VIM E.ss.. .So s:sp:
sS;s e sssI sss s' CON- no.
g &:
!. s ai' s i H s
Ruled out by the Court.
Witness believe Lee on HI: osn :. ss q; I'm: b:
would have believed his word
year, had The opinio. g him that he h. now
q s% e Ss
~ ss .:s s:%s z eSss. os''''
% he cause o. Less removal Il: has
Chsis Kinb.I sSxornwsosss live: IN w..hiss:es
knows John Lee .oms people .psas pretty bard q
amy al hs
reputation was very good; has heard people say they
M PieTrspont objected TO the questioning the
Mr. M.rrick read from ga Howard e.ss Of Tsiss and
Of the United states as 70 the orsr Of ausscp Wit
judge sher decided tina Il would not DO o show what
rspa s sa whose dssspsd
Wness resuminc-as heard several speak Of him before
the Court that he Of rspa
taton OF Lee only as to a few persons
reputation either for or agains. bin The question e. what
The witne,sI have only heard few parsons speak OF
Mr. MsrricS here asked the witness what no had heard
said Of Lee since this trial began
Mr. Merriek said desired ascertain whether what
had said Of Leo had out Of his testimony In this
Judge Fisher said desired hear argument on The
% De aamnea ssnopasd " any is. might have
grown out OF the te.tn'ay 20 gns nave gwen IN any
Frederick Calvert swoKaew. L:s y: reputation on
did when he was employed with witness in mo ocs under
Mr. MerrckErom what you know Of his ssnsr. repusa-
ton would YOU believe hum under oath ~ AZ ~. hin,
The Mon OF the witaAss ought
70 e the Jury 70 damage the character OF nan ~
The Court did not see what difference made; the
their opinion US to tho value Of such testimony
that he would not believe Lees oath his life wss -
BY Mr. Carrngton-witness would mot believe Lees
wor Ssad no
every day while draft going has heard Lloyd
Ss
% ns ws Lee nar .
he ocs made charges AGAINST HIM to he prS,9ss
heard cons between Lee and Lee Y:
% ess " Charge until % a me he
service detecting Inc % S.sse
tve engaged As clerk In taking stsemsns o.
right to act upon taken but 70 report
the %n after e % tho. az no. S
By Mr. rerrepcnt-w.ns.: was summoned asSus .wslys
O'Clock to-day and never said 70 anybody what witness could
Colonel Jas R. o'Berne sworn--Rssids ia tbs ey am
REGISTER Of wills during the war was n oss he A D
and had charge Of Che enrolment here from Janss.
@ =, ns
office IN Within few mSnAs Of ss s %s ws' ~
ne he Lee s
q q: y
sa%a:l ~ sfow% W. rsass
4; Sc.
Lees reputation for truth and veracy was b.d Witness
*. %:s,
Mr. caa aea oSsesd % he :: ~
denos new sr. had bssn granted ~ tbs ss.s For
record oor OF TRIAL oosHesa !us NOT
fenced and where . new trial hau Doon grantoor
Merck said he should offer the record ~ % the Con-
OF Ceve and then hs prosecution could rebut that
in any way they chose
The here waived, and Mr. Nerrtck stated
should the indulgence OF the Court 70
adjourn at this point A. bic colleague M Bradley H.
defence should NOT be deprived Of ~ right arm at
Mr. Darlington stated hat the purpose OF shs
prosecution press the Trial If counsel on The other sds
sick.
The Court concurred In the proprey suspending for
to-day Bradley suffering india
position aud ther a twenty-five minutes past two
N uut tomorrow morning ~ ten O'CLOCK
Booths Letter to the National IntellIgencer.
The Washington Int Iigencv declares that mo COM
muncation of kind from Booth or any OF his ss-
socates In that great crime received BY any
person directly indirectly connected with the No
ional fseHigccr That such letter had been written
was believed bat what became Of IT, OF what were its
contents have until recently remained mystery. 10
appears from despatch Of Washington CORRESPONDENT
of the YORK HxALD that the fate Of the letter and
the tenor OF s have been disclosed 70 the
judiciary Committee Of the House Of Represent ativee
BY the person whom the letter vas given by Booth
MISCELLANEOUS.
TINE EVENING TELEGRAM -