The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-10-07
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.
EIECTIOH,


COURT OF COMMON PLEAs.-Judgs Brew
as nd %a s q oan sns
was decided by his Honor Judge Brewster-
in the @ seventh election ITO pdvsOn Oho Fttesns6 @Srd
ezeg aSsR sd 10 p5oP 9s as Of 10 b of ss
place of voting on Tuesday october g. 1867 the ol-
Iabie the Judges Of the Court OF Common Pleas and
Where the said eeotoh is 10 bs hed 1u opinion @S 70
r First 5 PoT to tenn a. 1851 the place ot hold
Ward, was at Twenty-fourth and Spring Garden
second. The sherTs Proclamation called for the
election to be held at that place, and was issued Sep
Thlrd September u, 1867 Councils changed the
and cailOwhiI Streets. '"'0 O'vi9On W uu''
Fourth September ia. 1867, the requisite number Of
citizens signed and presented to one of the consta
bles requlston to call meeting of the citizens of
northwest corner Of twenty fourth aud Spring Gar
Changing the preSnct house. and that il was pub.
lished and posted according TO law. -,o,.. -. ,,
house at Bidde and Callowhil Streets notied Coun-
S ohas
sixth SePteml6er 27 the me shs M rif by snP9ismesn
that The election would be held at No 24S7 CalowhlI
seventh September aOth, 1857, the meeting called
r srso aGS al
he he votes cast were for the house at TwentyfOurth
henTPg nS Of thsss
October 1851 the Court upon consideration decide
h&f pc al s S nGis h In said
COURT OF QUARTER sEssIo oNs-Judge Ludlow.
hs 9Fn9g, n5 the Grand TpEynd Pe.t Jury
Judge 6 Peree sat to-day 70 order that the trial of
m Be S@HpEd ga but a % S
our report 4r, the he case was was on trial
matter OF the Reliance Insurance company to use VS.
Gecon was rendsSed fhis moSRias siso the following
to open Judgment and let Il the teTrs
nnn we 5S 6 os HS % 1eIenSei The grounds
hs he & sa o an the oFdsE T OF of The
the MORTGAGE OF the plaiutitis against him.
Sn The Of e19 H9 O. m s IL
But the Court afterwards allowed the deed
bid above the amount q Ihs @oftsase and on % me me
mortgage ON The Same terms the purchaser % oon1 1s
yeyed IL to Mrs JermonI who asks to be allowed to
sSiSIsassh ri56sT das6s5ssS Ss sale
sasS e he5 With Se sGeped % b ss ased
on confirmation of the arrangements by the orphans'
o ae & BY se bo Bs Bs on ON the
mainSsnance Fl the mortgage as an Investment, aud
as S s Of ao he az & no
IL was quite as we'll nay better than to require the
s5y &c b Of an Wo" To sSs SsD
think, therefore the mortgage was not discharged bS
the sale Il we were so 70 hold u would be contrary
% smSn S RaTss Snd would defeat Re
Hes o the S mogg would hs Sna
@ heTso5e 0ySTrGe YER the az p1 for for
tenant Motion refused
Court counsel. fOrI defendant asked for q rule %
Judgment, etc. In the same matter, upon
atiidavit that MIS- Jermon was never served with q
the writ should have been served. The Court over.
ruled this motion, because IL was improper and uns
precedented, and because the ground laid was no
reason whatever why IL should be granted,
ISTRICT COURT-Judge Stroud.-Ferre VS.
| James Cook. who was sued with George Cook, now
or late trading A, Cook, the Sheriff having re-
turned nihiL hdbet An action on promssory NOTE
| Verdict for plaintiff, e2S7 81.
Samuel II. HILL, and LavnA Ihll his wife, to the use
OF the said LaVina I'LL, Frederick y. Groope. An
action on prOmissOry note. verdict Tor plainunt
Neff & Turn VS.. T. R. Eagen & Co. An action on q
| promissOFy note Verdict for plRlnlih, e98I83s
| Mary II. B, Smith VS.. Daniel smith, Mary Jane
| smith in the right OF Mary Jane Smith, deceased,
| and Charles A. .Ger8sF and BInor Gardener terra
tenEpts. An action OF eteclmenE verdict Tor plaln-
| tifis S2se mesn profits - - - ,-,--,. ,,,. =.
| the sad Mary j. VS.. Hertel " Brother. a fegned
issue to try ths title to certain personal property
| DISTRICT COURT-Judge SharswOod.-Alex xander
| II. ShreeVe Adams IL evils. An action to recover
5000, and interest from March II, 18 5 which II was
Alleged the plaiutih, in March. 10 8, placed In the
| bands OF defendants, then brokers and bankers In
Chesnut street. above Third with instructions TO In
vest 1t for him In shares OF tho McCntock Farm on
stCek and which neither so Invested returned
| to him. Verdict for plaintiff, S5763'83,
hmma Carries VS.. Anthony Conrad Administrator
An Bction TO recover money due for board. Jury OUT
| Patrick Banner VS.. James Robinson, .garnishees
| An action 10 recover money in the hands OF gar-
nshee XeTdietior plaintiff and in the hands Of gar
| nishee, S7579.
| COURF OF COMMON PLEAs-Judge Brewster
To dRY the first for Jury trials; but though Behu
efforts made by the Court 10 begin business
| Thursday