New-York tribune., 1867-07-30

either did II true falsely, for IL matter he could
made that request under the circumstanCss: Although
| Mrs Surratt was bent on murder she felt the
strange: for a man or woman sometimes looks to
God when about 70 commit when ns Is
table construction that can be upon eis act VINO
Fitzpatrick brought here for that purpose but she sim,
ply teses negatively and she did not hear It, she
did not hear T. wsichman says he did hear II, and
affirmative testimony must be taken In preference 70
the stairs and In this he "a not contradlcted except
again by NEGATIVE proof for Miss Fitzpatrick says sue % aa
s1rratts saying that Booth was an to punish
a wsS AND ~. GsSgs . nSn .c Hs @ not
prove the murder AN and & Sas a and
der would sti be amply proven relation to the trip
to Canada Weichman Is confirmed in every particular
gS III fss,s tes o aee@ te.mSny carnson
continuation had certain Items OF testimony Say feSo coya
mupcSiisn sao With ons McIaushia then Is shown that
tried to set ssDs from s h' euSus
forts to get leave aud not granted and sGrIa tnGes
Ere sayes card and tells him not to mind
the business Then hand in hand he goes through this
mStsd Does not al this recapltuation Of evidence
show that there conspiracy and that snrIatt was
Harold part Of this S0nsp5acy P6r init
Conspiracy next point what part did he perform
in that plan and Conspiracy Mr Cafnsto;n Car s;a
II esn Ur 70 sng %
Necessary illusions but 1t was his business to denounce
crime aud he would say anss h WIN Tno
All cruel were towards and IL McMllan's testimony
Ssrs Was IA coward. and he could ind no other name
wherewith to designate what his opinion was OF the
At this point o'clock the Court tooka recess for half
| an hour. -
fore discussing tho proposition Of fact referred before
the he %na rsfss 90 faSs fSea Sesp teg
| by counsel as "a murdered woman" and Dutchered
woman and he thought this was doing the greatest IN
suppose after the verdict IN this case. If
sens snGod oi r be
derers; would It not equally excite your Indignation II
the yspt @ tSo q ry ysrd LET 81
Merrick has by implication fnot directly, charged those
acting under the orders Of the President Of the
United States They tried hrs surrstt and found her
MI Bradley said there was evidence to that pOntin
Mr. Csrrngton said IT wa. strictly responsive to the
arguments of tho defense, who said Mrs Surrat was
repM any such nsnuaton, and ne denied It. and would
show that Mrs surrat was neither u murdered OF
Mr. Bradley said the fact open. and could
y M Darlington asked why he was Interrupted theni
Mr. Bradley said he wanted to understand II the point
order that the deien,s might not be .oPPed
tho detsnse they had cast the first stone aud was his
American tribunal ever found necessity 70 declare q
woman guilty OF murder but when ING daugh'er esr OF
1
ing; when Lncretia Borgia shed blood she deserved
hanging and when Mary 5coS Surrs a co%passedd Sep%ed
hor hous become the headq OF the conspraors
public safety demanded that she shonla be condemned
| when found guilty. Who composed that Military Com
misson They were men not more honorable than these
Jurors but they were equally hSnoTaDethey were r OH
supposed TO b honorable men md Yet tSy
wS' wSS teSP SSR0unSs The Ito q an nnoesnt woman
But whether Mira surratt innocent not has moth
ing do with this ease is TO be considered whether
4 ~
raft He did not know for what purpose this subject
scrore tSey Believed the members Of tie Military Com
mission were murderers and butchers. Mr.: Car.
Mr. srrstt VITA the conspiracy lie regretted 10 do this
but had been forced upon hm by the defense First
this fSSf be rsroncied with nnocence fsit reconcabo
with Innocence that any house could be the rendezvous
The arms with which the bloody deed was done The
person who furnishes arms the woman who puts an arm
on to equally guilty with the person who actually
commits the act II John 81 Lloyd . to be believed, did
tenant he lived in her house; he drank her liquor why
@ Lyd s and
t.I agent Of MTs surrait aud did not wish 10 testify
arms in asee deolgnated by the prisoner The mother
knew Of ths because afterward asked where those
asol in ther night reached tue surratt House, Booth
had broken his leg and they needed retreshment aud
TO which Mr., Surratt had left custody Of Lloyd. saying
would soon be called for Ba, be needed S,d something
that ready 20 hs hand. placed In proper place by Mrs
s seGn n 5 s Ip s snTat n & a aot s
although 10 Is enough Mira 5urratt goes home and the
apparently wording man. comes in and he proves o be
Louis Payne. That would AZ least prove Mrs surratt an
accessory after tho fact Il proven that she visited
Payne At the Horndon House, and yet upon this night
| shs denied all knowedge OF the man; and
| IL. Is welsetiIed principle that deliberate
ss,her apPsTcnt thsi Mr, s,Tratt in che
spracy and n In IL at ALL in tho most minute particular
shs Is guilty No reference has here been made wech
an % r horS s AMPLE hsr tomHe
and wth.her tongue did Mrs 3urrau urge these young
men on 10 their deed Of blood.
Mr Darlington then Left tho subject of Mrs surrat and
referred TO hs point as to what was he original rhn snd
chaac,or n il led 20 murder All tho conspiiatos
~,TS M e9sry sy iniruptnr asked mr Darlington /, he
wa, 20 bs understood a, saying that n conspiracy was
entered into nbduct, aud members OF tho con
spracy changed the plan u murder whether all OF them
Mr Csrr1nsion Replied that II the plan was to sbduct
then ali the consprators would bO guilty M Caring
ton said he would nov proceed 70 41Se 9e OF the other
solutey to prove the prisoners presence here on the
s S h.Ss % y Sy BS S ssd Us ass seed
| II wo did not trace him here on ApSl u, 1861
| York train. MCMILLAN testified that surratt LEFT
Montreal that too. In obeyancs 10 summons from Booth
According TO tho testimony of St Marie surratt left Wash
ington April 5 according 70 the testimonysf Maurice
April 10 Ho remembered Mr. Bradleys conduct ON that
OCCASION when he said he did not wish 10 ask the witness
que Has DrOhan been oOntradiCtedi Has he not
been confirmed by westfa who said man inquired
anxously when the trains would runi He tMr Caring
tom the Irish character they would hgt and drink
whisky. but would not lie and Mr. Bradley did not dare
TO xamine the witness one witness starts him
from Montreal; another him tho way; host OF
witnesses testify that the trims running and St
Marie he Acknowledged he left on the morning OF the
18th Can be doubted that surrat heret lie is
here by thirteen witnesses among whom are Reid,
susan Jackson Yanderp0el Grs Lee, Cleayer Dye and
Cooper; all him here at different hours. and but
witness has this point contradicted tho other The
Hr.t Ifn.a nm ha laat w
Bradley, IT,, said. was notorious gambler
Mr. hadley-Weli, isn't he