The national Republican., 1867-12-12

tee sa.., and Aulh2riIlng trustee 70 pay Axesi
ayainst absent defendan
The court adjourned until this morning..
CRIMINAL CoURT-Judge 07fn---Ths following
essss U.s., were tried and disposea Of: -, ..,.,,
WSpR r. JSanna & srIScny n9 pros entered in
Lewis Wilson, larceny of clothing Of the value Of
ti guilty, and sentenced 20 twenty days imprisOn-
William Rslsy, charged with stealing six sheep
from James viekars. The jury found a verdict Of
kun b, Douglas, larceny Of clothing valued at go
from z. p Crowa; guilty ,,. .,,.
',iS ?Sss.: ss%'; sssss:s ss Grand l.r,sP,
prIasi % plead % gully T%s Judge. aiisS mailing in:
aay q hs prisoner a. e. his PTSvlSSs; S
Calvin, brown. charged with stealing watch and
Klus ic,jln that the watch &c. was stolen from
iSs S e Ss and ss.
maker on Ninth street. daift5 ssr'eseed to twenty
days imPr.onmcnt. lana. n y.xu, .n..r
srsssSt S"is pros Entered aud fSrititarc d Gisi
John fsx sisrss& viii .tSains itrss Umbrella.
from th store pavement o. Mr; Ross, in Georgetown;
ns$ fSs, EsG s.IssG Si, 4
June last two pairs Of pants balcggus g Mr. Gunty,
S Sm Ss SS psI e. re sSS SSSi
being brok Gu open 10 efce! an entrance, Guiiiy.
pPSSFs gSS; fffsEIS s Ss &c s 81 June a ai
guilty, and .entepecd g 0dsys, Imprisonment.
MTs : KI,s d ( 4 Of June last guilty; foeS%i
Isrsoa wsgirSit. % the 10Th q March. 'csr2aSga-
s %ssS SS:. $sSysl SS$ SssI sSss:
After argument BY Nc, Adams and Mr. CarrnEion.
As py aS % si
he sr%s w.s S0c Which GSsh j%IGS must solve for
Tfe jury, p stSf iefins for short time, re,urned
verdict ofnot guilty, y,s
The prisoner thereupou began TO clap his hands and
shout -" Thank God !" evidently from the bottom Of
his heart: he continued his rejoeing' until stopped
The court then. at o'clock. adjourned until this
morning,
sdy. bsGpimSsr i, isr yon motion % Hon. Thomas
tsd practice attorneys and eOunsslIOr' Of this
"a SgGs ;, S q Sg sses G1;h9g HENRI joe:
is 81 sna Sf q fSS Ss SSu. .
da%n SiNa he sssd Soy
ri .1' Mu%lSS sn.s T.s Psaa sfKaaa q Sy
to the Court on printed argument by Mr.. Ewing Of
"; 81 Israel o. La'k plaintiff in error. vs. Leon
states for t1G District q MiHno;Ss Three wrs OF
M Tss sis rs sSS 81
II counsel for the appellecsI aud submtted to the
Conrt on printed argumens by Mr.. Donohue for the
M THs 70 Society for Saving. pIaIntiGit n error.
ho consideration Of the Court on printed argument
aaa NJ HSbSar SNH@Ii or MI IA
ANY NY pisl9tT srrgf. I Hfs psSpe q ES Uaisoi @
4' SSa oh tho TsTSy e. ds Ts w
NJ. 55 William l: iSns ,Platniiaia error, ys, =.
Cd state: {sr t6s Northern District q California. On
M IL ST. iSs S iS %ss ss
%ss ys to SpS ID Ils q the writ Of
No IS. Charles Eddy ct Al, appellant. vs.. John II,
billings. The hearing Of this cause was postponed
TEs Maker s Az cy GSsPo sS gt,6 e nR!%Sr'
q sstes for !IS District q asTysRd ri. % appeal
haUsPnss vi Ssns Sns al Il O'clock
Stars Gnei2a; redfStr"s rs chat
sGSs rrSr q r. fhSsiss Hs R srro4
This was au action for redhhtioh TO avoid sale OF
psCn sss The
S with @ dysrsS 'sns A. the yss:
Moses, Leah, Hammond, and Peier-for the sum Of
lur thousand Ave hundred dollar tina, and before
ialadies or defects, whereof Hammond and Peer sub
rIuently died, and Moses aud Leah became useless
nd their services so imperfect that they would not
ave been purchased had plaintiff been aware VI their
The petition alleging that the defendant know ofthe
lees defect OF the slaves thus sold aud omitted to
loney repay OF expenses incurred on account Of
ho sickness Of the slaves, aud damages generally.
he petition further ayerred the tender Of the slaves
The defence was that ''N ViquIe' s esq. the aue.
oncer who sold the slaves In question, was requested
SsSS pTSr TG G 70 sr ssNer So TSsS S have 60 be
10 purchaser, aud that yiqpie did SO declare u loud
Oce from the sand ut the timo OF the sale II IL then
aNes purchAsCdhy him away that he, IhrouSh his
gent sent request TO respondent 70 have them put
4 board steamer on oertain day, before any act
NaminAtOn, aud without complying with the terms |
nd conditions Of sale, aud that II any loss has Oe
irred u has been through his own negligence and i'm
The trial resulted in verdict In favor Of the plain.
for the sum Oi tl,'R with interest, and that he
main tho owner Of the two slaves still living at
cred on that verdict the plaintiff appended, moi being
'iished with the conclusions OF the Jury, insruc
u by the Court.
The action turned onho question Of tender, and the
Ourt instructed the Jury that 'n order 10 complete
'sCsion of the contract the tender should have been
lSl It was not made within such time. The piSntia
as only entitled to recover for the ges hu had
lsaiped by the slaves being defective In the manner
Iess. The Jury found that the plaintiff was tardy
max Ing tonder-in fact made no tender Of Peter
NIL aiter hiS deeease, and hsnce their verdict.
ruet the Jury that the tender Of the slaves In con-
oycrsy, " sufficiently proved, was only necessary Rs
prerequisite 10 the resslson Of the sale aud that
as that II should be made prior 10 the Institution OF