The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-07-17
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF QUARTER sEsSIoNs-Judge PeIrce-
Assistant n 'Dstrct Attorney. .HFrederlck Iutz plead
guilty 10 charge OF assault and battery upon Anna
BENJAMIN Taylor q this Court, bench warrant for
the perso nSf one Clara Keyser The Gesr ana MF
near cslewhiii, Where Il was SAID this girl Clara
sSoFoughV SsS ywitHoat SdnE o0ecs their
by the T b St o4ner % Grown and Vine
While they were at this house the young lady,
her mother this city, wasgoing down Vine street
her boarding house below Second street and as she
took hold OF her. saying you are Claral She replied
ofcer Mr.. Taylor ran to where this took place and
being satisfied that there mistake, insisted upon
Shed her 81 into Rss lager beer
a9d locked u But sSe was Allowed 70
go to her boarding house, where the officer was con-
Several witnesses testified to the respectability Of
The Court ordered tn defendant to- pay fine of s25
and the costs. , 10.
larceny Of clothing valued az siS beon gne to Edward
Moran. He entered Mr.. Moran's house In the day
cSaries @ HobrCok plead guilty to charge of the
larceny Of gold watch aRd chain m belonging TO Alex
employe in the establishment and had access
dence reosed in him. he robbed the safe of this
Mr. Mann called the attention of the Court to an
% that has happened %n, since ae
case Of the Commonwealth vs. w. ]. finch, charged
with keeping bawdy house and a gambling house.
the defendant In order to give him time to procure
the attendance of his witnesses, Two young ladies
Monday and yesterday. and af.er .he adJournment
St The instance s'f Of Finch upon a charge
OF perjury in swearing falsely In this very case
and she herself testified that while abe was in the
cell at the Station House F9sh and his wife came TO
they would effect her release. Mr.. Mann said he did
weaiIhs witnesses in this manner during the CON.
unnanGe OF case, ana thonght II was no more Than
ledge Of the Court. The Court said It was best then
thai the defendant shSuld be put trial some time
The case was called about one o'clock. Elizabeth
knew that he kepr two establishment; one No ia
Race street; and one No % South Tenth street. she
boarded AT both places knew he kept them the
Infamous purposes mentioned In the bill Of lndiot
ment. AT the close OF our report the case was on
John w. Powell and David Buck were charged
silver watch, valued AZ SIS. Kerns genuine son
House eseG that on @ sH MonHdSyy s 16s sa M
O'clock he was passing little leisure time in WASH
be- Sad neVe seen before and who soon enSaSed
him in conversation: He !Bpck) took ball from his
opened the ball. took some brown paper from It,
near and Buck raised the question with him whether
not there was paper In the ball and finally raised
had no money. However, he said he would bet II
KeIns would back him with his watch. He wInked
taken the paper from the ball and was betting that
ana sharp eIpressons nduced Rerns to- pS BUY p bs
watch Powell then called up to hold the stakes
and the watch given to him. Upon getting the
watch, the whole party started off on run. Kerns
held 70 Buck, and Powell was arrested the day
Verdict guilty.
with an attempt TO commit burglary. Mr.. John
Brooke testified that about ~ O'clock last Mon
day evening, he was Informed that one was en-
deavoriDg TO break into the honse OF Mr. Childs at
Seventeenth and Wallace streets. He went 10 the
p ace and saw the defendants endeavorng IN pry
open q window shutter of Mr.. Childs house. Ohicers
were procnred and the defendants were arrested.
Several citizens, residents In the
ana several policemen testified TO the same state OF
facts IL seems that no Que In the house at the
time Mr. Chllds and his family having gone to the
country. Verdict guilty,
Samuel II. Schult was charged with the larceny of
cigars valued at geo The evidence was that he went
10 a cigar manufacturer, ana said he had sold Ave
hundred cigars and knew where he could sell more
and asked for cigars 10 take out. The nanufac
tuTer gave him these cigars, and told him 20 come
back that evening account tor them. He took out
the cigars, but did not return the money 70 The
who had given them 20 him.
The Judge charged the jury that u they we're con.
Vinced that at the time OF obtaining the cigars the
defendant intended 70 appropriate them TO his own
use II was arceny but II this dishonest Intent was
secondary Rfair and not entertained at the original
receiving II was larceny, the principal Question
being the telOniOus intent Jury outI