The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1867-02-26
S. nays So So the House refused 10 suspend the rules
The following is the vote in detail


nays So So the House refused TO suspend the rules
The following Is the vote in detail
YEAsaMessrs Alley Amss, Ashley Of Ohio, Baldwin,
soawe Brandese Broo@a Baesaaa sandy Clarke 81
6hio cqRsns g Barring , 9sS PaSss pea P3eTng
Hisby Holmes Hotchkss Hubbard q west VA, Hubbard
Gensie n Kelly KsscSu@ Koon u S OF F
ss e oh ae nsnss1 o
MysT Newell o. s. Ees 81 Me- r sS rss
held shslaSarge spaldins starr Stevens rtsyeT Tr9w:
We %s.sa9a 81 oTs " %sS e.
Williams Wilson Of Pa. and woodbrdsemS . ..,,.,
isS FOX s1s ssspsl
Edss y H. Of Firt a
Hayes @ nss nSs ss k ks 3
Blond feitw!eh Loan Mar,,I Msysard m.calSSgh
s3Se Rsdfod sipSI raymond Ritter
Sawyer schenck shankhn; sgrraves sioa, Ssw oli'
John l. Thomas, Thornton, Trimble. Ward OF Ky wssh
burne OF Ind Whaley Wilson Of Iowa, Window winfield
The House then went into Committee OF the Whole
the state OF the Union, Mr. Boutwell, IN the chair,
and resumed the consideration of
Mr. WILLIAMS (rep.' Of Pa, moved 70 amend the last
istng law which il repeats section OF of act Of
June 80 1854 which section allows manufacturers dcliv
crng goods under made prior the TO add
10 the price of such goods 80 much equivalent
to the duty subsequently Imposed Hc spoke W sup
| port Of his amendment
| amendment The amendment was rejected.
Mr.. CoSKLSG moved an endment repeating all acts
and parts OF inconsistent with this act aud also re-
peang sections co and ia OF the act OF June 80 isos
The elect the repeal Of section ia Is to put advor-
tsements tho free list The other s ono OF The ad-
minsrativc sections about dstlleres aud oil rehnercs
/ The amendment was adopted
| Mr. STEVENS offered Amendments as new section,
providing that IN OF seizure for alleged raud pons
may be given for double the amount OF alleged frauds
and the business allowed to 60 on The amendment WAS
| adopted
Mr. MILLER offered an amendment requiring inspcctors
or distlleres to give bonds in less than ooo
Mr. DARLING moved to amend the amendments by max.
| ing the minimum IS, 900, which was adopted.
| The amendment, as amended, was adopted.
| Mr.. SLOAN, (rep) OF Wis, offered an amendment,
abolishng the office OF inspector of dist lerlcs, which
rejected.
| MIR LAWRENCE, (rep) Of Ohio, offered an amendment
repeating The law authorizing the secretary Of the
Treasury contact the currency but the point being
| made by Mr.. Morrill, II was ruled out Of order
! Mr. sIrRILApARGER, rep Of OHIO. moved an amend
ment, enacting that claim or prosecution for tho
recovery Of any CLAIMS sarens from violation OF the
| revenue laws shall DO COMPROMISED OF discontinued
without the Of the United States District Attorney
OF tho Attorney General without the approval Of
| Mr. DARLING moved an amendment permitting
nformer prosecute suit IN The name OF the United
States Notwithstanding the refusal or neglect oil he Col
| lector to do so. The amendment was adopted.
Mr.. LYNCH moved TO exempt canned and preserved
| shell fish from the The motion was rejected.
| MI Ross (dem) OF III moved TO mako the tax on
incomes over $4,000 ten per cent The motion was re-
| Mr. MILLER rep, Of Pa. moved an amendment per-
hitting persons interested in oDsamped papers TO aiIx
| and cancel stamps which was rejected.
Mr. RApfoRD, (dem) of y. Y, moved that on the ar
ticles in the free list Of per cent be i'm
posed after the LIST of June, 1868. The motion was
rejected.
Mr. TRMBLE, dem Of Ky, moved to reduce the tax
on whiskoy to 81 Der gallon, which was rejected-yeas
| a. nays 20.
At quarter before three the committee rose and rc-
ported the bill to the House.
| Mr. MORRILL, reviewed the various amendments re-
ported from the Committee Of the Whole Oh tho state
or the Union In the OF his remarks he opposed
the Addition of tho cotton tax He said IL was
oppressive tax and he had doubt that the Southern
States would themselves he In favor Of Its continuance
Mr. ROLLINS on this subject submitted table showing
the amount ectcd the rebel States for 1885,
from which appeared that the tax collected from cotton
was over fifteen millions and that from all other
was only four and half millions which twelve
thousand dollars less than paid by tho small state Of
| Rhode Island. This amount distributed through the
ten States would hardly pay expenses of collection
and would be well exempt those States from the
operation OF the Internal Revenue Law. Tho following
4 hC tabio:-