Marshall County Republican. (Plymouth, Ind.) 1856-1878, 1867-10-03
TEG4T TyyELLyGENrE

LEGAL INTELLIGENCE
The September term Of the Marshall
Court of Common Pleas met Monday morn
ing, September 30, the Hon. Judge +. J..
Egbert presiding. The docket of State
cases i'm this court is about as largeas usual
this term, the cases being principally for
assault and battery and riot. The civil
docket is not as large as usual. there being
only about sixty cases. The business oil
the court on Monday and Tuesday was as
follows:
STATE CASES.
q State Of Indiana vs.. David j. Larcw
Appeal case from JUSTICES Court, for iorci
BILE detainer. On motion of Prosecuting
! Attorney was mol pressed
| 1. State OF Indiana VS.. Phillip for
selling spiriiuous liquors TO persons in a
itae Of intoxicatiOn. Appeal case from
Justices Court. On motion of Prosecuting
Attorney the case was mol lJr0ssd.
.. State OF Indiana VS. George Boland,
for assault and battery. The deirndsn.
waived arraignmcnt and plead not guilty
and the cause was submitted TO court. Wit
nesses examined, and case argued by coun-
sal. The Court finds tho defendant guilty,
and that he be fined in the sum Of s2:5.
| 6. State OF Indians vs.. Isaac Pearson;
assault and battery. The defendant waiv
ed an arraignment and entered q plea of
not guilty. Jury impane.led, evidence in
PRODUCED. and case argued by counsel. Ju.
~ finds the defendant guilty and fixes the
| fine in the sum Of s..
9. State OF Indiana. on relation of Aaron
NJ Irettyman, Va Darius Haglc, for surety
Of the peace. Appeal case from Justice S
Court: case dismissed.
10. State of Indiana VS.. Mary Ann
BsymOn. Assault and battery cause con
iinucd for process.
IL Stale OF Indiana ". Ellen Baymon.
Assault and battery; cause continued for
process.
/ : IL. State of Indians VS. John O'Niei
Malicious trsspass. Appeal from Justices
Court. Motion to quash for want OF suili
cicnt affidavit; motion sustained and action
dismissed.
3. Slatc of Indiana. on relation ofJscob
Combs, vs. Thomas Quinlin It al. Surety
or the peacc. Appeal from Justice Couri.
Plaintiff defauled cause dismissed.
Z. State OF Indiana VS.. Brooks Fox
Assault and battery. Defendant waived
arraignmeni and plead not guilty. Cause
submitted to jury, and verdict OF not
guilty rendered; defendant discharged.
Three State cases still remain to be dis
posed OF on the docket, viz:
Is. State of Indiana VS.. George Vail Ct
al Assault and battery.
II. State of Indiana VS.. George Vail It
at. Riot.
u State of Inlianavs Timothy Kursct.
Assault and battery.
CIVIL CASES.
l. Looma Devincy Ct a. VS.. Margaret
Thompson q RI; cause continued.
,. George w. Ryerson vs.. Daniel II.
" ood administrator of the estate OF Oil
yer Smith; claim settled Ivy the parties.
{. The F. +. & c. r. Il. TO. vs.. John
w. IIough;on ctui; plaintiff delaullsd and
cause dismissed.
6. Fanny Palmer vs. Alonzo Palmer;
Divorce PROOF of publication.
.. Samuel {. Davis e at VS.. Consider
Cushman; cause continued.
10. Myroo III. Brown VS. Darby y.
Ports 81 ri; cause continued.
Is Aaron w. Smith ". Daniel II.
Wood, administrator OF estate of Oliver
Smith claim dismissed.
IL. Claim against estate of Philemon
Shirley. amount So allowed.
rs. Claim against estate Of Jacob FrecSe
allowed.
~. Claim against estate of Simon p.
Wood: allowed.
10. isaac Moore vs. VIM. Mccormick.
Suit on note and account. Defendant de-
faulted Judgment for $i0l,I7.
u. Watson G. Conant Ct Ol vs. Horace
Corbin e oi; dismissed by agreement of
parties.
- James ~ English VS. Edward En-
glsh. On note answer fled.
-. Luther l.. Mills Ct ~ VS.. Adds T.
Woodruff ct al. Defendants defaul,cd
Judgment Stl2, 50 without relief
26. Marin l.. Kennedy VS. Mary Ken
ncdy. Divorce: defendant def.ul,ed
-. Ralph Davidson ct az We. LLOYD
Lamert. On note. Defendant dcslulted
judgment. sll6,7o.
30. NJ. *. Fsrrand VS.. James Thomp-
son. Action on Judgment. Defendant de
fualtcd judgment Tor S34o,S1.
81. Joseph 4. Mcdonald ct0l vs. John
f. Linn Ct al. On note. Defendant de-
Isulied; judgment without relief for Sj5.75
81 kero hurry - 0i VS. Sias H. Ri,-
icnhousc. Action To enforce mechanics
lien causs continued by agreement.
33. Barnes It ~ VS.. Samuel Parker
On account. Dcfsndan. defsulted; judi.
ment for S75,Gs.
81. Nicholas Albert vs. Daniel Bows,r.
Alleged insanity. Jury impaneled: YER
diet that the defendant is person OF IN
sound mind.
3s. Isaac y. Compton va. Thomas Per-
~. Foreclosure Of mortgage. Defendant
defaulted Judgment for Sl09,25.
Il. David Young ct al vs.. Milton NJ.
Gsleniine. Note. Defendant defaultsd
judgment. 1862 without relief
~. Ralph Davidson 81 al VS.. Jacob G.
Huff. Foreclosure. Answer filed and de-
murcr 10 second foreclosure answer filed.
~. George y. Chase VS.. Sarah Dong.
Note Defendant defaulted; judgment for
SIS. 10 without relief.
4G. Daniel Bennett We. Christian Nifong
et al. Foreclosure. Defendants defaulted;
! judgment for $685..
80. Harriet b. lIolccmb VS.. Matthias
Chapman ctot. Foreclosure. Defendants
defaulted; Judgment for S245,i6.
A considerable amount OF probate bust
ness has also been attended to during this
term.
a.. Richarl Roberts Ct al vs. Richard
Corbaley. Note. Defendant dcf4ulted;
| Judgment for S235,25 without relief
4S George Brockus VS.. David johnson
ct al. Foreclosure of mortgage; Judgment
of foreclosure for Sal 90, without relief
81 Bernard Trentman ct al VS.. Martin
Buchcr et al. No G. Defendant d ( ute.
Judgment for S232, 80 without rclisf.
So Isaac Hanesvs. John Waltz. Note.
Defendant deiauiicd; judgment for S265, 81
without relief.
50. Robert TAYLOR VS.. Milton VI. Galen-
iinc. Note Defendant defaulted; judy
mcnt for S2Is,6l without relief.
81. James Frazer Ct al VS.. James
Thompson. On judgment. Plaintiff di:-
misses the action at defendants cost.
So. VIM. III. Wilde VS.. Henry Her.
bricks CT al. Foreclosure of mortgage !:
continued for process.
IS. Samuel III. Block ct al VS.. Charles
O. Frank. Note: Judgment Confessed for