New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1867-01-30

the fac. that when the order given TO drive out the
boat not UP the level Of the bridgs a Re;ng
chain bridge suppose it could be raised or 20
bring with the falling Of the tide e 9s %
defendss servants tine oeSss
below the level Of the bridge, or i the bridge was I'm
movable so that could not be uniformly brought to the
Of the defendants to have such structure The snbse
quent charges which was made show also, that
proper precautions had not been taken for the
safety and security passengers and Il the arrange
this tlme serious accident ike this would not have
Tss b SD condeP Whether
there was mutual negligence or that cooperating nsg
and without which the accident could not have happened
t would be assuming too much to say that he was guilty
the bridge and ali that occurred afterward Tar he
was nyOht9Fy s me S sweS ear expressly
mon the boat and it was proved by other
could advance upon the boat opt was Pusneo PACK
TO the right or TO the left when the horse retreat
ing from the bridge, stumbled ana len upon mn; s
the boat and Off It. and that he was placed in the position
impeed pushed forward BY one class Oi p b Vas
wedsed IN so as to be unable to move not his own
act, but the acts OF others, and tnat SUCH ,Sta
Of things hCGS haTs Ssssct to adopt
such for the ngress and o passen
gers the one to which they me
OF such For these reasons thlnk there was
Client in the case to e t tSs Bn Smith
agt n Y. and Harlem Railroad Co, ~ n l., ~, 1872
EdgertOn ag The Same IS Barb @ d BTSTn sgI at
Murphy Duer, 2n; Alden agt N T. Central Railroad
Co, &c n Y, lO2 Buel agt. The Same, SllNlYp sis.
CHAMBERs-Before Judge BRADY
THE n c,S1 EY CONTRACT AGAIN-MoTIoN TO STAY MR..
DEvLIN's SUIT UNTIL THE GENERAL SUIT BE DE-
Charlie. pevln agt The Mayor, &C., and others
This was an application to stay proceedings IN Inis
Court in this action until the trial Of the action carrier
On u sSSr tif BE- ss eS fhe pS claims to been
interested in the Hackey contract to tine eneH1 o %
half the and SUPREME r'Or So i ssn s0nsn'
PENDANTS being his co-assignees In tne eonessoe,
and ths On b couTt suit with author
ty to conduct proceedings behalf of all the parties
Se Common Peas not on the contract but for damages
for its breach In the Supreme court case t tho -
ton was Fiat had been distributed orpromsed out
of the contract to the Mayor Counclmen @c VINO aue
on behalf Of the city a1d G da 5 set down for
trial next month Meanwhile the Common Feas sui mas
The application for the stay Of proceedings in this suit
based upon the grounds that the Receiver a
Of his duties and that the Supreme Court having first
obtained jurisdiction OF the matter In this marKea
pose OF the case defiance Of and that this was case
Of great public Importance, which 1t was especially III
ON the other hand It was urged that the character Of
the was totally different one being Tor damages 1
plaintiff TO compel him to wait for case already pro-
tracted for such a time.
The Court reserved its decision -. 60,
Mr. McKeon and MT. Dukes for motion; MI. Mason
and Mr.. Marsh opposed. -,
THE LAST OF THE FAT-BOuING SUITS.
CharlesJ Blehe agt Jackson s. Schultz ct al -
This was one of the suits brought by the fatboilers
70 terdct the Board Of Health from interfering Win
their business and was disposed Of yesterday the com
plant being dismissed by default motion OF MI bnss
- SPECIAL TERM-Before Judge BRADY.
Meyer agt. Burke.-Moton granted. See memo
randum. ~