New-York tribune., 1867-03-15
SUPREME COURT CHAMBERS MARCH H-Bofore Mr
Justice INGRAHAM.



Edward Learned agt. James VI. Ryder-Motion
granted without costs. defendant stpulatng not to
Diver Carter and Henry e. Hawlcy ngt Theodore H.
Looms-Thc defendant might at'any time have compel
led the plaintiffs TO charge him In execution after Judy
mrnt Not having done 30 he cannOt charge the plaintiffs
with idoho for his delay. &c He Is entitled however 70
O. Gays after notis OF the order is Procetdhs Is sg
statute m the defendant required 10 act before
he II entitled tO relief unless the pntiis also are IN
fault Herr the plaintiffs have been guilty of gross neg
lgencr for which they not entitled 10 any favor
"a day act and be dschnrgtd l think he defendant
should Do allowed 10 do this at II the plaintiffs
ing the 10 day for want OF being charged In execution
the debtor gives II days notice and makes an assign
charged q piantif docs not 90 stpnate in five days
Antonio Rock agt Thornas Churchll.-This motion 4.
rs.o vas 70 Obtained by fraud aud whether any Sims
plaintiff for the prize money and any further order
fucas :. watkins ast. F a. Mlzoner-Motlon granted
James II. Young agt Asa Hall. Jr-Motlon denied ;
plAinurf = cost. tlo 10 abide oyents
Bernard Hccht et al. agt. William j. Curtis et al
Motion granted payment of costs of sut No costs Of
motion
Tho People rcl Mary Bean aet. A. d. Russel, city
Judge. Application for wFlI OF prohibition deucd with
CiRcurr-Before Mr Justice LEONARD.
TnE c0LUMBIAS bis INsCRANcE c4MrAMI N. ASSETS
This is an action on premium notes given by the
defendant 10 the Columbian Insurance Company OF which
ti 800 To this the defendant makes answer first that
they took the notes when they nsoyen and had
business 10 take them second that he has had 10 rein
sure u Of s0 aud ought 10 be- allowed o set that
OF third. that tho affairs of the Company IN Boston
has already "a suit There was little dispute Tho facts
aud tho Court therefore directed written argument to
be submitted 10 him, suspcndDg his Judgment N the
Mr. flsd and Mr Dudley Field for plaintiff; Beebe,
Dean DOnohue for defendant.
Hear J Ie'y ss. Gbfah.s \ samuel.
In t..f
s n P99ln, SS charge Of paTonns letter tro the
brought ed verdict for pn o4 ,o the Jury
Before Mr. Justice suTHEKIASD.
I9E SjraiIs SGSfAISE6 ThEoUdH GLLEGs6 ShSET
Mar Hurley at John Mertn.ni and Another
This Is ohe oi the numerous class of suits brought
received On account Of the alleged negligence Of their
ployes.
owners OF the broadway aud stage line.
In 1862 plaintiff resided al No Is Whtest on the nth Of
September OF that year about o'clock I'm the evening
she started with her husband TO take stage up town
They crossed broadway from the west side, and when
stage which had stopped them. and plaintiff accord.
Ing to her testimony, was about To follow when OF
stage plaintiff VAS about to enter drove up. the poo Of
which struck plaintiff the breast knocked her down
breaking three OF her RIBS fracturng her thigh and rem
dering her insensibe from which Injuries plaintiff alleges
The defense Ia general denial.
The glst Of the Testimony for plaintiff to the effect
cross and that defendants stage had been driven
NJ dangerous speed II the horaes attached To IL had
been properly guided the accident would not have
happened.
The point In the testimony for the defense was TINT
neither at the time OF the alleged accident for long
period afterward notification was mado To them AZ
the occurrence Of the alleged accident.
The Court charged the jury that there was n slmple
question OF fact Tor them To IL them
70 decide whether tho alleged injuries sustained by
tho negligence Of detendants driver, and II so what
amount Of peeuniary damage plaintiff entitled TO-
IT, from the circumstances, no negligence could DO Inn
The jury after brief absence, brought In verdict for
plaintiff for VI 600
The Court granted an allowance OF $50.
ii. +. Hatch for Plaintiffs John O. Dlmmlck for
defendants.