The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1867-08-14

Parrish spoken of by Mr., ,Gosden Is hay.
ing. given him the 81 900. When handed
It to Mr. Gosden I told him. to hand II "a
Mr.. Smith. I did not tell him ANYTHING
| about the object of the money .WhenFl
gsye it, to him. II, did not tell Mr. Smith
the purpose forwhich the money WAS sent
[The, question, !" Did you send the money
for the use of the lseparators, or for some
other purpose 7" was here overruled by
the court. The, court, however, agreed to
hear whatever argument the prosecution
might wish TO enter upon the point Nj,
Chandler discussed his right to but THE
question. The courtadheredt dtoits deciaion.l
l had q conversation. With Ar. James in
1 relation to the separators once. It was
before the, separators were, sent.,. It, was
at the Hewlett distillery, ON, the south
side of James river. Mr.. James remarked
to me that that disti1lery and others were
using his patent, and that he, ought or
must be paid for the usel of them This
was, Think, IN 1867. I don't remember
agree TO. pay him anything. for thems 4
i never did pay him thing for the osepa'
| rators: never had any conversation
| with Mr., James in ncrelation to the 81 1000
sent him. Idid not authorize: any one to
pay any money to Colonel James for the
use of his ,separators. / never paid MIR.
James any money for any purpose.
Questioned by the defence :. The check
signed by me was: drawn after I saw Mr..
James at the distfllery. I think there was
something said about bringing suit against
those using his separators at. the distille-
ries by Colonel James. Mr.. Clarkson was
not present, and /; did not hear the, CONVEX
sation. Thegcheck for 81 900 was sent to
Colonel James for separstors. u I'A~
Questioned by the prosecution: = The
money. Was not sent for -separators at.the
time It was sent.s,I do not know, the pnr-
pose or nature for sending it at that time.
I think Colonel Clarkson told me to send
it,-but he did not tell me at the time what
was the object for sending it. 2saaS 'gsF-o
Mr.. Henry Smith recalled: 1.-THE ques-
tion by the prosecution, did you have
Immediately or shortly before you offered
Colonel James the 81 900 any con-
yersation. with him concerning the pay
ment Of any money by Parrish, Denmead,
or others S' was objected to by the de-
fence. It was, after some discussion, ac-
ceded to, and the witness answered, 2"
had" The question, z" When was thisi,"
was answered, {" The day before re-
ceived the money."J - '''''--' ,.
Question: (" Was it in relation to the
81 ,00O afterwards sent.'' 90 : $ 800: ..,::.
& Answer: ]" It was in relation to the
distilleries on the river. The Colonel
stated to me that he had not received his
money from. those distllers.g I said I
would see the parties. did so on the
following morning. Up to that time
nothing had been said by Colonel James
about separators. I had a conversation
with the distillers concerning the subject
matter of what passed between Colonel
James and myself" .-,, --....-...----
Mr.. Chandler i" What was that CONVEX
sationS" [Obiected to by defence. OBJ
lection sustained by the court.
Mr.. Chandler: "Was the $1,000 sent
owing to that conversation 2" [0bjected
to.] ~ .--zsunfe
Mr.. Chandler: ".Was the $1,000 sent
after that conversation 9"-.
Mr.. Smith Son the morning had the
conversation with the distillers the check
was drawn. This was, 1 think, half an
hour after the conversation -5gz,s
Mr.. Chandler: "In that conversation
you had with Mr.. James about the distil-
iers not having sent their money did he say
anything about separators :" a.,.s ,z
Witness: "Not at that time." 2@1 ~ag
Mr.. Chandler: +" When did you have the
first conversation with him about sepa-
rators?" .so,.s..
Witness )" When presented him the
money" ssaat o. Ea =
Mr.. Chandler: !" Did you know that the
distillers were using Colonel James's sepa-
rators?" .l.7 p -.r-a..g o. -.
Witness: 81 was well aware of the
fact" - -, .2@-z.sl. --...
Thomas Hagerty, sworn : am brass
finisher, and reside in Richmond. 80
Questioned by prosecution: "Did you
previous to the Sth of January, 1867, ma
nufacture any Of the separators knowh as
the flames separstors r" Objected to by
defence. Objection sustained by court. .
The hour of adjournment having ar
rived, the court here adjourned until 10
O'Clock this morning.
tn.