The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1867-03-11
LEGAL INTBnLIGEN CE.


ISsES Ss I0@gsSn dssas HRS 4dgneopnon' in
East Pennsylvania Railroad VS.. Schollenberger.
Error to Common Pleas Of Sehuylkill county Judg
simpson vs. Thornton. Error TO Common Pleas of
Fhiladelphas Judgment reversed and proceedings of
AGermun affirmed, at the cost of defendant in error
opinion by Woodward, c. j. -...
ceedings of Alderman affirmed cost of appellant,
Clifford vs.. McDoneld. Judgment affirmed,
Powell VS.. Burroughs. Judgment ahimed. Opinion
sKaley vs.. ,Foiiz. Judgment affirmed. opinion by
Copton VS.. Philadelphia and Reading Railroad
Company. Judgment affirmed Opinion by Strong. J.
Cronse VS.. Cronise. Judgment affirmed Opinion
Roberts Roberts; Judgment reversed and ~.
Welke VS.. Long. Judgment affirmed. Opinion by
Kretzler and another vs., s., BassIes, Executors.
Jqdgme9 a5med In Qpn9n by Church
srees in She twenty second Ward ceroraf to the
0S5i opinion by THOMPSON, j.tI'hs is before us
af ae wS been 2eSd beoW on the
10 the report, Kirk's Appeal Casey, l8j, Spring
index s5. Hence the presentation Of testimony by
the exceptonists is out ofpace SO far as this case is
/. The first exception oferror is to the power and
February 1856 assess damages to the properly
owners on the street. Whatever difficulty there might
have been to maintain their right so under the
act OF May %, 1854 all doubt was removed by first
recognizes right as existing and needs no aFga
3 The second and third specifications of error
are objections to the competency of two of the Conn
Court we take notice OF the testimony 10 prove
IT,: Rule OF Court supra.
noticed, ''''' Gnu u''O -'' 10
point not embraced by any of the exceptions to the
proceedings below,nor raised by any exceptions
10 the confirmation of the report of the Court Quar-
ter SESSIONS on IN this Court namely the constitution
Ally of the act of February 1885, under which the
the commissioners nm S We're appointed nor when their
this Court excepting in argument Under these cir
NVh
doubt as TO the entire constitutionaly Of either
cokT As'S@S6 5T
9GTw ahE BTserd DS E519 s
torney.-Ihs oyer and Termner term of the Court OF
Quarter Sessions commenced this morning. This
announcement. as usual assembled large number of
| The trial OF Gotiieb Williams, who is charged with
killing Mrs Eliza NJ Miller on the 18th of Septembe;
case are SO much involved In mystery that the pubI
at large VIII no doubt be anxious 70 hear the full de-
nation Ine ss6 os a n OF Jury occupied the
pannelled, and the venire was exhausted The Sheriff
and his wheel were brought in and he proceeded to
/ Bile at clock this afternoon. Thomas j, WOrrei
Gf 4 RPTdE& % R2 sGSSs lGF ddsSPs R.su
ter.-The homicide cases were begun this morning in
pose of the usual criminal business, his Honor Judge
special venre Of jurors was returned to serve in
this Court and some time was taken up in hearing ap
number gentlemen who plead ign Srance OF the itn
guage but st answered the questions pu to them by
smallpox was now in his family fully developed and
| the Court excused him tor q week. - '''N
| Jacob Lansenburger and Martin Noe were cbargad
with the larceny of goat skins valued sCs the bro
perty of hensinger 4 Zegler. The prosecutors are
dealers in feathers and skins at Randolph and Jefsr
| streets. In the latter part of November their
store entered at night and l0s goat skins ware
stolen They were afterwards seen in the possession
Of the defendants, at an Alderman's Office IL was
shown that one Of the defendants went TO store in
Third and offered these identical skins for sale
The persons At this store recognized the skins 90
| those OF Hensinger q Zegler, and asked the man
| where he lived, suspecting all was not rsht fTha
said he lived az certain place In POPLAR sreat.
but this not So for those who went to arrest Mr.
ON o warrant could not find him. After tha arrast
and at the hearing, one of the defendants said he Al
not steal the skins, but knew who did and tbaJ tha
| man who stole them had offered him 81 for every
| dozen he could sell. " ''SiS
| TheI defense was, that LansenburRer receivad tho
| skins from man named Dumord for debit He thsH
| gave these skins to Noe, shoemaker 10 turn intn
| cash promising TO pay him 80 much on the doze1
| AS far these defendants were Concerned tbev oh'
tanned the skins honestly; II theft had been com
mitIed II must have been Committed nv nnmord %
| was not in Court. His absence was expIansd ,hHs
| II was discoversu that this man Dumord mad sold a
| akin to a man in Maryland. "Au SUI"
This skin was recovered, and Identified bv tho rro
secutors Dumord was taken before an alderman ibU,
discharged on account Of the absence OF
witness and soon afterwards left she city Cln t.i
| COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-Allison y 7 Tbo
Orphans Court argument lisTwas called this TnorninH