The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1867-07-26

tempted 70 show INA. he IL n,ra on ne i..h wa.
lore surely testimony Of rebut,as sSsraeisr The
o ~ sSsd not S. s9s Where her =
woad be strictly in answer 10 the proposition Oh 'ne de-
Bradley ss%s e s sn
hsre on a 4 wa. question jury They
had attempted show that he fled the 18Th that he was
Il. a sS ns
sa o M 1 T Sa TO- he wa a' in Ea and
Is ssd thai he was m Era sogsssda IN rs And
q murder Al q. evidence should have been Tered in
as The e.m sun IN relation he ,ssss r SsnS IN
ope,aton he hr Bradley coa,d not see vSshsi
W S :ssS evidence as
BE 10 he he ss "a Ss s
treason and no other se except u act OF murder could be
sIS ssy as%p %
ns e r snS Sp orsT 20
egt.oate asser.ed that they would AZ surraits
sssiIy !. s sfas?
sSs r %A De S Offering sy
s. sH' AND nss s .ssas
o oa no h e e y on "a, the
Sas nc WAS s hers then they were bound % show that
ss.. 81 ss:s
ep nS got and they
s;sS .aa TIE P,sosrs should Be proven
NOW ney w sS 70 DO n S they @ @
not Ct Dc wen az evidence 70 reply.
Mr. Merc said he believed the defence had The cose OF
mr. fisIrsp0s. said he a,d not make spsach
20 s'; The sy
& ' esns TO close
Mr. Bradley sr.we agree sir We are now willing to
sired ssy & .s ne case yss cossd ss
able Il. hr Brsv sad gone for
employ ssss 'sss e. q SS"
sSoTsei ' Banker honor ri M re-
rangemen.s should be made about the funds the
he thought ss nnS he o
vii now 81 M s ssss oas ars
met Mr c,-rruon ,.
nde FsAer asked what Of the point about which
Mr. Mer.ck said that with All the of the
Judge Fisher said point OF importance and
M . nc w Se nav to &c .
ana gheihsr each sde was entitled 70 two speeches
M. McrT!ek hen ked whether The ae5eace declined
20 s to ss me spssss Of one Of
Csrngon sad mai as tins was case OF great Inn
agreement would be wi'hnrswn unless the case was con-
sdeiei entirely closed Their rropositon had been TO sub
Mrs PoFrcpont bad not so understood IT. he un.
derstood the evidence only closed.
II then appeared that counsel had misunderstood the
Judge Fisher said he would decide upon the points argued
at one O'Clock Tomorrow
Van. Roberts sworn and examined by Mr. P,crrcpont-
was IN Elmi.a IN June 1866 saw Mr. Joseph Carroll,
least The srore where Mr.. Carroll was employed as
cutter: ar Carroll dd not mention any dates upon which
did not bear anything about the 18th Carroll did
not say he could not Identify the prisoner there
fert was IN New YORK. and that the got Sur
rats prescn,e there; dom he any date
was In i New e So se' A''h' time by knowing
STnn srowa"s sworn and examined BY Mr. Pierre
Of Prisoners.
ere.cendned al nlm,ra on April H. 1885 '''''''
MI BRADLEY OBJ Jeced as II was not expressive 10 any
Mr. Perrepon SAID twas for the purpose OF showing
there were then Shere over i've thousand prisoners
unless 70 NE testimony Of General Lee which ruled
Mrs NJ A. Fithian formerly sherman) sworn and ex-
ahmed BY MT rierrepontLve at the Tenth
was an Alderman Of Phadepha snew john ee repm
aon while be was an olcer under husband; his char
John f. s aaed sworn and examined BY Mr. Pcrrepont
knew John Lee Philadeiphia; never heard his
reputation for truth and veracty Questioned.
saw him In company with OF The detectives here
William Parker sworn, and examined BY Mr.. Carrnstan-
clerk The treasury Department. know John Lee; never
heard his pcp9aton io t.uth ard yeraclty questioned
ny MT bradley-Did not know Lee until he q detec
William Parker and examined by Mr. Caring.
sixth and Chestnut streets, knew John a number
o. years IN rhadephia never heard his reputation for
BY Mr. Brsdiey-Did not know Lee while he o dcec-
half past three O'Clock p N. the court took recess
until ten O'CLOCK TO morrow.