The national Republican., 1867-01-29
The Courts.
SuPREME CoURr OF THE UNITED STATES
Marn.v I.uasKx lea-

oufRkhk OoURT OF THE UNITED oIAIks'-
MONDAY, January 2S, 1857.
On motion Of Mr.. Carlisle, VIM. P. Sheffield Esq.,
Of Rhode Island, was admitted an attorney and
counsellor Of this court.
On motion Of Mr.. Merrick, Joseph L. Brent, Esq,
Of Maryland, was admitted an attorney and coun.
sellor Of this court.
On motion Of Hon. r. johnson, Hon. W. L.
Sharkey, Of Mississippi, was admitted an attorney
and counsellor Of this court.
No. SO. The United States, appellants, VS.. jose
Francisco Armejo OF al. and
No. 1853. A. P. jackson at al. interyenors, &C.,
appellant, vs.. Jose Francisco Armejo OF al. Ap'
peals from the District Court Of the United States
for the Northern District Of California Mr.. Justice
Field delivered the opinion Of the court Affirming
the decree Of the said district court In those cases
No. 90. Tho United States, appellants, vs. Jo.
sefa Montalo do Senano ct al Appeal from the
District Court Of the United States for the Northern
District Of California. Mr.. Justice Davis delivered
the opinion Of the court, reversing the decree Of
the said district court in this cause, and remand
ing this cause to the District Court Of the United
States for the District of California with directions
to dismiss the claimants petition.
No. 9l. Eliza Leftwich ct al, plaintiffs In error,
vs.. More l.. Lecanu. In error to the Circuit Court
of the United States for the Eastern District Of
Louisiana. Mr.. Justice Miller delivered the opin.
ion Of the court, affirming the judgment Of tho said
circuit court in this cause, with costs and interest
No. %. Samuel Ware OF al, plaintiff In error,
vs. The United States. In error to the Circuit
COurt oil the Unltou bthtes tue Dlbtrlct
of Pennsylvania Mr.. Justice Clifford delivered
the opinion of the court, affirming the judgment Of
the said Circuit Court In this cause.
No. 6l. The United States plaintiffs In error, vs..
Rufus d. Vassar. On q certificate Of division Of
opinion between the judges Of tho Circuit Court Of
the United States for the Northern District Of New
York. Mr.. Chief Justice Chase delivered the
opinion Of the court In this cause, answering the
questions certified In the Affirmative.
No. 6s. The United States, plaintiffs In error Vs.
Samuel Schuremanj
No 90. The United States, plaintiffs in error. VS.,
No. TO- Tho United States, plaintiffs in error, VS..
No. H. The United States, plaintiff. in error, VS..
No. r. The United States, plaintiff. in error. VS..
r. Bowen.
In error to tho Circuit Court of the United State,
for the district Of New Jersey. Mr. Chief Justice
Chase delivered the opinion Of the court, reversing
the judgments Of the said Circuit Court In these
cases. and remandng the said cases to said Circuit
Court for further proceedings to be had therein in
conformity to the opinion Of this court.
No 3S3. The United States, plaintiffs In error, vs..
Nancy Swain. On certificate Of division In opinion
between the judges Of the Circuit Court Of the
United States for the district of Massachusetts,,
Mr.. Chief Justice Chase delivered the opinion Of
| the court In this cause, answering the questions
certified in the affirmative.
| Nos. 355 and 356. The United States, plaintins
In error, vs. William Graft. On certificates oi
division in opinion between the judges Of the Cir.
cult Court OF the United States for the Southern
District Of New York.
Mr.. Chief Justice Chase delivered the opinion Of
the court In answer to the question certified THAT
the law imposing the special tax In the indictment
| mentioned, and for the non-payment OF which said
indictment was preferred and found, Is valid and
| not unconstitutional"
No. 1870. Antonio and Faustina German, appel
lants, vs.. The United States. Appeal from the Dis
trict Court Of the southern district Of California
Tho appeal In this case was dismissed.
No. $50. The Milwaukee and Minnesota Rail
road Company, appellants, va. J. T. soutter, and
No. 1854. Alex. Fleming, appellants, vS. J. T
Soutter Motion to yacAto supercedeas and Il
dismiss appeals In these cases oVeTruled.
No. lS2 Allon Rollins, executor, plaintiff II
error, vs., Tho City Of Chicago. Tho argument o
this cause was concluded by Mr.. BeckWith, o
counsel for plaintiff in error.
No. 1913. Tho Washington, Georgetown ant
Alexandria Steam Packet Company, plaintiff II
error, vs.. Frederick Il. Sickles ct al The argu
ment Of this cause was commenced by Mr. DaVidgo
Of counsel for tho plaintiff In error continue'
BY Mr.. Bradley, Of counsel for the defendant IL
error, and by Mr. Carlisle, for the plaintiff in error
Adjourned until tomorrow at II o'clock.
PGiidiiy Of a Judgment for The payment Of tars
in eoin-Ihs act Of February, 1852, providiHg 10
the payment Of dsbi, IN legal tsadG'-E MaHdsl
baum and C, KlaEJsr, plaintiff IN error, Us. III
People Of the United States IN the Territory Q
Nspada.-This was an action commenced In tn
District Court Of 0rmsby county, Nevada Territory
to recover tho taxes alleged to DO due from th