The evening Argus. [volume] (Rock Island, Ill.) 1861-1871, 1867-04-08

GIRLS though they n1DDie little at 1t at nrSt,
soon refuse it entirely land don't wonder,
for never eat it myself Then there is an
additional advantage IN always having the |
thin gravy. In fact, under this sort of man
agement, / have known the boarders to
discard it altogether in less than two weeks.
don't believe much in meat, anyhow, for
girls it may be good for men. Girls don't
need to have much bloodA-it makes them
gross.
LIST Prop.-Capital, the very thing have
been practicing in my school for several
years. How do you get along with butter
when it is fifty cents per pound?
I'd Prop. "A little more difficult that. They
| will soon quit eating meat and hardly seemto
know it. But they do growl for butter. The
truth is I have had the hardest work to get
my girls either to eat strong butter or do
1 without, of most any other one thing. L as
ually buy old butter first, that is not rancid,
and get them accustomed to that, and then
come it over them by degrees on the strong.
They can be brought up to the point BY de-
grees, but it takes patience. j have some
times stretched the truth little, both as to
/, the scarcity and price of fresh butter, for
) which / hope / may be forgiven. l have
ever entertained the opinion, however, that
girls eat too much butter. 1t partakes too
much of the character offat meat to be whole
| some.
LIST Prop.-I am glad to hear you speak SO.
: was always fond of good fresh butter my
e SELF and never perceiv that it injured me,
2 but agree with you that young girls ought
to have it very sparingly if at all. / have
been very successful in my treatment OF diet
= in improving the appearance OF my scholars
4 They are completely changed sometimes in
) less than month"; Il gives them, most
delicate look, and after little a beautiful
l. tinge of health is often seen in the cheek
K The heavy, greasy appearance is soon bleach
e ed out. They should not be overburdened
IS with fesh--there is danger of a rush of BLOOD
y to the head.
I'd Prop.-Enough has been said to SHOW
~ that we agree in the main. There is on
g.. general rule that always ahdere to-hav
l. as few dishes as possible, and generally thos
u that are unpalatable, and then stick to them
y but here we are at the station, and l mus
off. Erit I'd Prop.)
re We suppose we are right in inferring that ha
OF | the democrats been in power there would hav
ID been no war for the preservation of the Union.
.ir Chicago Tribune.
@. Without any doubt you are right in NAL
IS, ing such an inference. Had the party of tn
in constitution retained power, there woul
es have been no attempt to break up the Uniol
Ist and therefore no occasion for war to pr
Al | serve it. HEss
IS, The democratic party did preserve Il
yn Union during the quite respectable period
k. seventy-three years, without resorting to al
en- was for that purpose The republican par
IN elected its president in 1860, and went
ly. war .'to preserve the Union" in less than 81
ISIS months afterward. And no sooner did pc
ne pie begin to think that that party had su
S. ceeded in doing what it protessedly set o.
Am to do, than its congress stepped in and OF
elf cially enacted that, instead of preserving Il
of Union, the war has in reality dissolved i'll
'st The democratic party, during period
,k- seventy three years, Illustrated its ability
sp- preserve the Union without war. The social
to republican party, within the briet space
ce six years, has illustrated its inability to p1
at serve the Union, either without war or wi
ZEN it.
EEL. Your inference, sir is a most logical OF
ng -Chicogo Times.