The Jackson standard. [volume] (Jackson C.H., Ohio) 1847-1888, 1867-03-07

we lind rules posted up. .~.,4...
sThe Jail is kept in good order, but the build
ing tselfis nothing more t, than mere excuse.
III G sForerhan Or Gfand Jury.
''Msrclll, lcS7.ss ~ I ~ ~
The'following business was transacted up to the
timeof our going to press: 90 z ii : lL &
State of4 Ohio vs. George WsKeedy Keeping
Room, &c. yI(F0T
Plea guilty. The defendant had taken out
United States Revenue license. and supposed that
he was authorized TO sch to be drunk where sold.
When indicted, he at once ceased the business.
In consideration Of these factssthei CeurtfxeAthe
fneat the lowest amount, $780, and ordered
that defendant stand committed until fine apd,
costsbel paid. Hastings for State, Machley'SOr
defense. 4gritS@t
State of Ohio vs.. Abraham Rankin. Keeping
Room &c, ~ .sa A,H6 f'tfni07a gb19'Gs
Plea guilty. Fine $4,000 and costs. Hastings
for State, Tripp for defense. -ssH@as@'7o .
( State of Ohio vs.. VIM. Ware aud Peter Ware.
Keeping Room &c,
Plea guilty Fine $50. .OOcach, and costs. Has
tiigs for State, DUNCAN for defense, III
Willis Reed VS.. Adam Lackey. Jury trial.
This was an action brought to recover the sum
of 600, being balance Of local bounty. The
defendant was one of the Trustees of Bloomfield
township, and went to Columbus with certain .re-
cruits to fill the quota of his township. The
plaintiff was one of these recruits. Defendant
paid plaintiff $780, and claimed that that was all
that he agreed to pay him. Plaintiff claimed that
defendant had promised to pay him $500 more.
Verdict for defendant. Roberts and Laird for
plaintiff Tripp and DUNCAN for defendant.
David Robertslvs Lewis Landrum. Jury trial
This was an action brought to recover the value
of ten sheep, killed and injured by dogs. The
only dispute was as to the identity of the dogs,
and whether they were Landrunl's dogs. The
evidence upon this point was conflicting. Ver-
dict for plaintiff, damages $16. Trip and Mack
ley for plaintiff, DUNCAN and DdHadway ford de-
fendant
Jonas McKltterickvs. Benjamin r, Scott
James Nannally proposed to swap horses with
Scott 'rhereupoh ChaflesSprousc remarked that
he had bought the horse for the sum OF Sl15
Nunnally and sprouse quarreled about the matter
for 4 lime, when Scott told Sprouse that he need
not contend for the horse, because if he, (Scott)
traded for him. he would let Sprousc have him
for $lt5. NunnaIlythen went home with Scott
aud got his (Scott's) horse, On the. next morn
ing Scott went with the Nunnally horse to
Sprouse and told him that he could have him for
$1l5. Sprouse told him that the horse had the
ring g-bone. and he did not want him.
When the parties traded, Scott gave Nunn0lly
his note for $1,000, as boot between the horses.
Nunnally traded tliis note to McKittetick, and
McKitteriek sued Scott upon the note, when
Scott set up fraud Verdict for defendant. Mo-
tioh for new trial Motion overruled Hastings
for plaintiff, DUNCAN and DuIIadwNy for defend
ant. .as aairaf. aW ta at i9iqaf
Elizabeth Jones vs. David D. jones'
This was petition for divorce. Charge, ex-
treme cruelty. The plaintiff and defendant lived
she was entitled in the estate Of her first husband
William Hughes deceased. Jones wanted his
wife to sell this dover and take the money aud
buy lands in Missouri The plaintiff refused to
do this and defendant struck her with achair,
breaking the chair, and injuring plaintiff arm.
Divorce granted. Tripp for Petitioner.
Susan +. Louderbaek VS.. Andrew J. Louder
back.
This was petition for divorce, on the grOdtd
ofwilliuI absence for three years. The evidence
showed that the parties were married over three
years ago and that as soon as they were married.
defendant left. and meyer lived with plaintiff after
wards. Divorce granted. Trip for Petitioner.
State of Ohio VS.. George w. Mclaughlin.
This was an Indictment for Stealing horse
from Abraham French. Plea not guilty. Jury
trial. This case was tried at May term 1866, and
verdict Of guilty returned. The court set aside
the verdict, and granted new trial. Defendant
gave bail, and then ran of. He was captured, and
has been in Jail for some time. The Jury could
not agree, and were discharged and the Prosecut-
ing Attorney entered Noile There Is another
Indictment against Mclaughlin for concealihg
stolen property, and he is still in JAIL Hastings
for State, DuTIadway and Mayo for defense
State Of Ohio VS., Thomas French,
This was On Indictment for burglary. The shop
ofsmith and Pine, blacksmiths, was broken open,
and colee.saek, containing bushel Of onions,
and also some brace bits, were stolen. These
were found In the possession of the defendant
three days after the burglary. Plea not guilty.
Verdict not guilty. Hastings for State, DuHad-
way and MAYO for defendant.
State of Ohio VS.. Martin Culp ct. al. '''l'A
Riot. Nslie entered as to Culp. u II q
VIM. p Lewis VS.. Elizabeth L. Lewis, d,
This wasa petition for divorce, charging I'M
potency. Defendant denied the allegations of the
petition, and filed cross petition, charging
plaintiff With adultery, and asking alimony. Di-
vorce denied. and $500 alimony granted. Dun
gan and DuIIadway for plaintiff, Hastings for de-
fendant,, ya.-.ss-s-.--..-,-..----,
sIsn, 0. n osEs % ,ata ,ssI sash,,b-r