Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1867-07-19

eis abd0ehtment vested by the Constitu non!
q The p9wer Of appointment OF all officers OF
pro yidsd tor in tKeConst,tution, Il vest dtin
me Presiaent by and with the advice and corr,
Aent oK The Senate, with this excepttoa--tnat
=. sasy saipe p4opsn
the President asone, in the courts Of Ia ". or in
ehe Head OF departments" But this btlt IL
these te be considered inferior fficers with
AZ the ueanin 6 OF the Constitution. does not
prov id6 Cor their appointment by the Prest-
dent alone, or the courts OF law. or By the
heads Of departments; subiectto the approval
that II We put this question and fix the charac-
ter Of tkis military aPpointee either way this
provision Of the bills equally opposed to the
Constitution. ~ 80 r. r
Take the case Of soldier or Office appointed
to perform the office OF Judge IN one of these
States, and as such TO administer the proper
laws Of the State Where IL the auth GRITTY 10
be found in the Constitution for vesting in q
military or aniexecutive ofRcer strict judicial
functions to be exercised under State law!
1t has been again and again decided by the
Supreme Court of the United States that acts
Of Congress which have attempted to vest
executive powers in the judicial courts or
Judges OF the United States are not warranted
BY ahe Constitution. III Congress cannot
Judicial eduties over citizens OF 1.-THE United
States, who are not In tho military
or navel sefvi So, to, 1t has neen repeat
eddy decided that CONGRESS cannot require q
StAte officer, execut1veior judicial, to perform
any sdu4y enjoined q pom him By q law OF the
United State& 0how then can Congress confer
SSt.sse - .arfc.-n snnh du,;as A., ..t..Y
esonersss-rrcnId not vs.t i, 49,. - 80 -
,,ne or tnsssa sstates anv ,n9tciss .nShns,tn
under thHf United States by direct lenactm snt
rectlv Nv rrsnao.-,p-t to Sci. ;.de.nns inu .'
ting an officer Of the Untted States in his place?
40 me thesB considerations are conclusive OF
the enthusiastically OF this pars OF the bill
.ha'r oone;S.r.t H, ~ - !. Sa.Ss Son nenu
oras. Judgment
Va
.,. - ~ M ~ snaI = ool ~ leEis,A-
S.. ~ ,s - os pso- 70 STU tuo Elk
49, - ;,s Pa.san,.s, .... o ny, % 1,nen. VI
s' a ~ sh s.oi - LUG Cohsttu.
. h anu .ne JAIN pIoEaooo m ~ oevoive upon
mo. tns 10 ne ,a;.hx au .no uuay " see
S, suu aa" aie aaitAIuly eAecuted. Inc
,as MN, ~ oIael 20 cary Oas tnls power
,hnS snh;aat tn'S;s snnx, anu MAKES
pmt ;n ~ a~"on.;oS s r.tn au - supet ~, ision.
t;n Va ohI;u,,o, ~ anese Avs, ine con-
SAL ~ ~ sa.,,.n ppm o mo .ss,oene TO-
ain, oas 49,, uno 49,. 70 tnat consul.
u mpa u NY IS onecsuaay 'ahsA away:
ne LIleAly Soninauuei 10 as 10 tue power
Drap;aan- nnd ,ha $500 ~ go .e pace VI the
,,I.ea ot H. an ~ ~ me army, the
Pc =, .no ahu ahy a.tenl ~ On Tue part
i o,,. r.iuon. " nsse. MS own consututlon-
a. poMe o.. nay, unuer po.ehce Oh Ia " oe met
~ omciai INSTRUMENTATION II IS not TO be
! s ,ia. LEST hiiIltary cncers LOOKING to
tne au, norl'y gwen oy tnese fa"s, rather than
10 tae ieuer OF the constitution, will recognize
no .'utnoIity put tns comm ander OF me Dis
u fIt anu, nn1an .'a usnerai h o, sas aemy
IL lne1e"t no otner oe]schon than this to
,nis pIoGssea ieSlsiaaon ~ would be sum Client.
WnhsG noia. tne Cniel executive authority
oiane snIse y ciates, ~ nlisL tue ooIRation rests
upon me 70 see inas All the laws are faithfniiy
e1ecaoeo, can never Willingly surrender that
trust or the powers given aOr It's execution ~,
IA can never give my ASSEM- 70 De MADE re-
sponslDie Tor the faishful execution of La VS..
andfao Inc samesfime surrender mat trust. and
ins paWers wn.eh accompany ~, TO any other
eNecuife oIfceI, MA VI low, or 10 any num-
pefsoi executive omcers.nIl TINS executive
,tus1, ses1ea oy ING Constpntion fnsthe Presi.
Gent VI enc uhl,ea oIaIes. Is 70 ne taksn from
nina aha vesteo IN a. 81 ooroinate offcer. the
assponsloiialy vii res. WIN congress ia
ciolnfne Ine suoofulnats VIVA VI cons Irrational
DOVE, oho "iOh Inc oincef VINO assumes Its
exercise .- :. .'-z.l =. 80. =.