New-York tribune., 1867-07-24

pon~It was on Monday night April H. 1855 thatI picked
En pocket E Lad Vh down n and dronped Tho
handkerchief can see not the shghtest IesemoaHSe 9
between Mr. Ho9han ana eo S1 ~ AK the
witness relative TO getting tho handkerohieI wasned
whom MT Pe1cpCnt S9Gcsdb &c rsbSfa WIS n''
MI Bradley s86 eGS ~ pSS aeS p Sa b% Sere
Mr. PieTrepOnt said that had nothing to do with It,
Mr. Bradley said when the defense sent for MT Blnn Inn
prosecution could got him here easy enough
The Court atmtteQ the evidence as gelnS 'oos Ino
Wlttss resae~i gave tho handkerchief to be washed
two days after found IT. then kept 1t In my possession
until was given up TO the detective on April 2 DO not
know the name Of the detective who took the haDdker
chief; It Of Capt Geason's detectives, and not
9nss Col Bakers detectives my uncle WAS SICK st the the
handkerchief was washed after my uncle died; know
Sss Ss tho nas O 3 the
bOats ran on the lake. can't remember the name OF tue
was living In Burlington; the detecyes nane wac Cha
pin; knew the name but 1t had slipped my memory ef
Falls lived the Burlington side Of the river: was
then living at Burlington. on the Win0os Fails I1sa
cause noted the time in my diary; know the handker
chief was found whore stated because tho boats then
ran, and understand 1t published In Ihe 1urnglon
Times: have letter from the editor stating that 1t was
published in The burlington Times presume was at h the
date Of mylnclos DEATH my attention had not been
By Jror-I wrote letter tOthe editor of The Bur
ln0tOn Times asking him II he published aboutlhndlng
the handkerchief and date thereof that was since
my examination bere the answer reireSnou my nhen-
By ne Court-I wrote the letter for my own graHca-
ton mypbject in writing was to SEQ II the editor con
BIZ M, MnTick-Haye no recollection Of telling Mr..
saying found two handkerchcfs don't remember say
aSeS bs DiSh dtq fO%nd hc my residence
outside of the city limits but In the town OF Bur
At O'clock the Court took recess for 80 minutes.
4 Upon reaSsemhllng o. T. Hobart ,cds reedued ana er-
and after testified. saw Mr.. Hdllohan in MT Bradley's
Office have no recollection Of seeing MI Hollohas ok
who wanted to pass IN my train without paying and he
looks nothing like the man. 81. l..
Mr. Bradley said he desired now to ask question per
sonsi to himself It had been stated in the public prints
that he r Bradley had offered Mr. Hobart bribe, aud
Mr. Hobart said no such offer was made to him.
and the publication was utterly false; and was made
had said the witness would be paid by the de
tense out of money that had been for
that purpose one connected with the defense ever
made proposition to pay any money TOR any testmony
pOnt-I know John T. HOllOhan was with him at Bur
lngton the evening OF April 49, 1866 on the morning
Of the 2Oth HOlIohan Bigey MODeyitt and myself went
to the depot and took the on tho track HO0han
did not lie down in the depot; my impression Is we took
the side track Holohan did not In Canada ten
that he left the handkerchief undor his pillow at tho
Joseph Teifs s,So7, and examined by Mr. PeyTepOnt
reside at Elkton. Maryland I know man named
Stephen f. Cameron he resided there In 1851 nave not
of minister no olerked for while for his father naw;
know that CaDeron's reputation WAS not good . =
would report things that Sere NOT true never exactly
associated with Cameron but have frequently met hi
Of persons who have spoken OF Cameron companions
that have associated with associated with Cameron;
heard any one speak OF Cameron IA being trustworthy
man his general reputation was that he was untrst
sSnsry said he not to be relied upon that Was his
general reputation in EtOn had knewn Cameron eight
or nine years. before 1861 can't recOeet "neh cameron
did not have a'bad reputation. -
JONES s. uEa sSo'7, 1 s"a eS%ss Ssr ey ybn & co5ny @
Commissioner; knew stephen ~ Cameron; hay9 ap aD.
Camerons reputation was that Of man much gwen TO
exaggeratiOn Vhs general reputation Was that ne was
not truthteer he did not have the reputation OF Do
By Mr. MaT1ck-I can't say that have ever heard tho
torn liar given to Cameron but have heard many persons
speak Of his exaggeratlon knew Cameron from 1858 I'LL
1851 during the war my sy"pates Nofo Win '0 WV
James n Me0SIou0h steora and erap,iaed ay Mr. Pierre
pontI i've in Elkton and have known s. +. Cameron
for truth and veraeity was bad.
BIZ Mr.. Aerriek-I associated with Cameron ana knew
tiOn 1861 in 1861 just before Cameron le Judge Price
and had relative 70 some cI sHS
statement that know was exaggerated there was great
was So Intense as to break up old frehdshps MrSCaue
ron was very erratie man, and attributed the exag-
acter Of mind such that he would exeggerate; do
not to say that he was corrupt malicious liar
Reside at EkOn; born ther and LEFT IN ls59 know
s. r. Cameron and know his wife aud family; saw him
there IN 1861 i was living n Philadelphia. and visited
ElktOn frequently have heard much said about the man.
but do not know that ever heard MS ior eao
tty much discussed can recoect particular instances
and 1889 have heard him spoken Of he was con
siderea nail oTsy man M ne
BIZ Mr. MeTTickWben said did not hear his chBrac.
oer I t wos shout 10 Years OF age then have
met and associated with Cameron can't recolleet spe-
eHe discussions CanerOns character heard hlm
spoken Of as o morally corrupt man he would oxagger
ate and dress up statements. -, r., - ..h ~
Joseph IT, AahG,, sso0T7l ana eIogned cy Mr. r'Srs, w
last in 1885, his general reputation for truth and veracy
By Mr. Merriek-IIave heard Cameron's character dis
oussed: no considered given to exaggeraton but
do not know that he was morally eorruPt ne was re-
feeling high but do not know that one-haf OF the
people Of Eso5 & thought the nee gtneT mar M p.r,
pOnt-Resde in Elkton and know s. +. Cameron; knew
is family have heard his reputation spoken of his gen.
erai reputation for truth or exaggeraion Is bad:
by Mr.. Brodiey.I am coaehniaker; 4new Mr. Cam
FrGnk titus s,oora and examined By Ar. Pierrepot-
Reside in Ekton; went there since 1855; knows g. y
Cameron knew Cameren's reputation for truth and
verscity. and think It was bad
BY M BrodteyI attended school in Elkon In 1887 80.
and 80. and down to 1854 know the people generally
aud heard them talk about Cameron; have heard him
names Of persons who spoke Of Cameron don't know
particularly who Cameron associated withS Cameron was
cer for his father n the grain buslness Cameron
given TO exaggeraton, and was considered Wild erranc
Michael MeNomar0 s,eor7, and eruDsiaed ly Mr. Car
rin1on-R Reslde Capitol Hin, Washington Know man
who was witness here named John T. Tippett; he en-
listed In my company, Company b. lst ID. q. Cavalry his
general reputation for trffh and veracity good
BY Mr. MerTicl-Never heard Tppetts character dis
cussed.
John H. Clark sicorn aud examined by Mr. Oorrin1so,,
Reside Washn gtOn, and have resided here since
mustered out Of service know man named Tppett-a
witness heFe formed his acquaintance III the 1st d. O.
Cavalry IN 1853; was for while LeutenantOf his
pany nppetts reputation for veraeity was good never
heard Il questioned. .
By Mr. MerTiek-Lafayette c. Baker commanded that
regiment, but with It h was commanded by
Lieut.. Gel. Conger In the field
JOha IT. CaDtpbeN end e1dSsed by M Caring
Io1-K now John r. Tippette knew him in the regiment
nerer hear renntafion for truth QuestOned by his