Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1867-07-19

ir., for appc'lecS.
p!ummer ". Shachcilorl aud Spiinan
uron 4 writ Of eurefsclcas toa Judgment o.! the
Circuit Court Of Alexandria CO. Argued by
| Claucllton and Beach Tor plaintiff, and Brent
for defendants. Judgment affirmed Will! costs.
Masters VS. Snowden--upon Il writ OF su-
nerscdeas to judgment Of the Circuit Court
of Alexandria county. Wi!loughby for plain
tiff, and Beach for defendant. Jud gmcnt OF
Circuit Court affirmed, and certificate that the
case Involves questions Of such novelty or
difficulty as TO make it proper that ltshond be
finally determined by The Supreme Court OF
Appeals.
Bennett Us. Hunter-uron . writ OF super
sedess to Judgment OF the Circuit Court OF
Alexandria county Wiiloughby for plaintiff,
and Beach for defendant Judgment Of Cir.
cult Court affirmed, and certificate as IN last
case.
Portner, &c, vs. Cazenovc--upon d writ 0:
supcrsedeas to judgment Of the Circuit Court
| Of Alexandria county Wil!oughby for plain
| tiff, anu Beach for defendant. Judgment OF
Circuit Court affirmed, and CERT iicates as in last
case.
Hudson VS.. Pitts--upon 4 writ Of supcrsedeaS
to Judgment Of the Circuit Court Of Essex
county. Argued By Montague Tor plaintiff,
and Croxton for defendant. Judgment Of the
Circuit Court reversed aud annulled-verdict
OF Jury set aside, and cause reminded Tor fur
Their proceedings.
Phillips Va. ,Ianes-~upon :. writ Of supcrse-
IDEAS to Judgment of the Circuit Court Of
Fauquier county Argued BY Tucker Tor
plaintiff, and Forbes l. Bro for dcftraani. -
Judgment OF Circujt Court reversed with costs,
and such judgment given as the SAID Circuit
Court ought to have given.
Scott, execntrix. VS. Scot;--upoa an appeal
from decree Of the Circnit Court Of Fairfax
county Argued by Beach for appellants, ADD
TayIur and Wi!loughby for appeliccs. Decree
oe Ciicait Court affirmed with costs.
Bcoughton VS.. Cauthorn~-upon Wit otssu
parsedeas to Judgment Of ihe Clrcnt Court
Of Essex county. Argued by jetfrles and
Crox;on for appellant, and Montague for ap-
rellce. Judgment OF Circu:t Goart affirmed.
Rhctt and wife W MaScn-upon an appeal
from decree o! the Circuit CoUrt oi Aiexau-
dria county Marshall and MaErnIcr for ap-
pcllants, and Brent for appellee. I)acroe OF
Circuit Court affirmed and certificate that The
ease Involves questions o! such novelty or diff
emily a. 10 make i! proper that the case should
be finally determined hy he Snprr!n" Nuint -!
Appeals
Batter vs. heynnd>-~upoH ri appeal FROM y
decree Of the Circuit Court of Caroline county.
Argued hy Iio!ia,iay far appellant and Cole
man ana Niaryo, j., Ior appellee. Decree Of
Circait Caur; affirmed ari cau&c lc:nan'lad 20
Circuir Court for further proceedings.
Stein Vs. Frederick: upon 4 wit Q! -urcrSc-
IDEAS 10 Judgment oi thc Circuit Court OF Al.
anlria county, Araued b. Baach fer plaintiff
and Brent !nr The defendant. Judgment oil
Circuit Cn;!rt reversed au>i aanailci ana iu!::
men, 81 Comfy Court affirmed with casts
l'eyaughn vs. DcgaushE rpana writ q 81
ir"rsc'lcaS to Judgment 0! IL C!?cHI1 Court
oil Acxaadria county. Argued by i;each 'cr
p!ns., and Brent for defendant in error. judy
men, Of Circui5 Court reversed md anni!!ed---
ro,,l;., re- ;nr, cot os;,le md cans, r,nlanlcG
c,a1non, ,n:Sl -, ~, h.,j - ,chieh ,o,c trial
a.. ;n..r,,o.;,. 4 ,u,;, n.ayn1 L.y j. +, h..
given.
prow,, .:,,;,;.,r,tccr s,o;ti,' : cvn,nt.rs
-,no, ,.r;t of s,,norsc,Ic,s 70 ;olnr,nn, q:
,,o r;ro,;+ rourt ol Alovo,a,;, courty, Ar
a,,o1 -, T,ri,,. ,ud r,olor e. ,l.;,t;F end
Du,.,,, .nli wo,nss far dafan1,o.. j., o,r,r --
raor,oot of rrcp;, Court reversed and an
nnllo} ma su,h ;u1ruco, roors,s1 os ,ho
r:-.,:t rouu4 o,ort 80 how. c;ron
o', ~ 0'"'S ~ Ire' r,D.I'.
l''''''sN ''' ;,,.a,.n, r. ~, r;ra,,:,
Vi >"p'ie1Nc"' ~ .'"5' " Wv