New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1867-12-16

srrEon oF JrLFs rAvRK.


daily expected
FRANCE
SPEECH OF JULES TAvHE.
In today's sittiDg Of the Legislative Body NJ jules
Favro submitted his Interpolation the Roman qnes-
ton lie hoped that the Legislative Body would express
its dapproval OF the expedition to Rome for four rea
cons. The expedition wae contrary TO The principles OF
right and compromised the Interests OF France was
especially detrimental the Il wished 10 serve;
placed France series OF complications out OF when II
Ouly possible 70 escape 10y committing an enf or ny
provoking legitimate discomfort 81. Jules FayTe re-
preached the Government with acting without consulting
the Legislative Body II the duty OF the Chamber 70
provide for the consequences Of accomplished tacs III
Jules Favre then entered into long Lsl"fch
dion lie did ROT admit that she French ov5ruI1tnt
was forced 10 consider Itself bonnd by the Convention u
ts l nsd SeeS eS S9d9 wi RH Sas c re-
getted that the GoveTnment' which ha1 expressed 70
the is sympathy for italian unity should not
have sought an amlcaole arrangement WIN Italy. ~
mera a Conference would necessarily he animated Iy
the spirit OF modern ideas and the only result would De
his speech by saying that the French Government had
had the eucyccal torn 20 pieces 10y the Council o. state,
but had picked the fragments TO make cartridges Tor
morrow.
me ARCHBISHOP or PARIS ayD xARQIs pE MousUER on
1iB ROMAN QUESTION
IPshs dee q ,orrsspobdsBes Of The L0ston Tine,
Tile preate whoso views the question u Rome were
looked WIN curiosity sd i"ssrest
Monegneur DArboy, Archbishop Of Paris. OF his doyo-
Church " Which he u 80 eminent dguitaGy no ono
doubted; but be II also know for the lheiy OF DIS
opinions ~ purely temporal and MS MODE iai9h IN re,
iioue matters The speech which be has just delivered
In the Senate, Of those WHO sgncd TIE notice OF IN
terpclation. received with much faNor ana atlb
close he was warmly congratulated by his colleague
Ills views the contenlaed conference deserve some
tancd TO the efficacy Of conference tha; govern
ment bound by rs signature Y protect WIN MI iie
t1a@ r. and or refused 10 be- bouSd by It's DECISION
Of
snaraftet Tor Their execution But upposng the con
leISnSe sC t ec e ~ codt for IN 10 f"ov-to give
back to The Holy Father the provinces that have been
territory or TO proclaim the &al's qno The hIst' me
Archbishop thought though certainly the most desirable,
~as hardly possible II il belonged 10 the jurs and The
do So FOR it behOoyed HIM 10 see that morality was r.
tpected IL woud not indeed. De difficult 10 define he
rights OF the Holy Father uJusty dtspolTd Tor no Sas
ana Is The legitimate owner OF what was iakrn IRON n
by force. Bnt ~ this world OF ours Wheie mere nCo
other facts wei ~ rigss. peollc 0ileh found 1nc
selves embarrassed in material ,t,e.-ti nud htor az,
fact. are ac- facts give bl 10 Interests ana ntel,'S
come time Doc called rights aId real oce Iihss Nu
facts must be taken ini account, I1 M;s ueut ~ ft.
and The couceeOn te necessities OF the situation were
entitlcd ia the present instance, -; did not wei know
whsC practicable but TN, Woun be matter for me
consideration OF the Conference. TO u,YriNe the Holy
me brcIblthop dlfcut immoral and almost inrraoca-
lie They were told Italy absolutely wanted hne;
I"st assnredly be calamity FOR those who remained
there after him. let the Senate picture To themselves o
a lllgrim Why, the very earth would ticmble beneath
bis footsteps ara his words would he malcdicoEs'
Rome ESia w Sy not e enough TO contain two soverr
lie had no intention to make personal rtn5cu2s ~
spoke merely for the future aud the nnkuO"h but ne hau
the right to declare that King OF Italy was 700 pey
parsonage 10 have his seat side by side with the fapac
This aTrang cement then, viz the Pope al Rome, anu
Rome belonging To the King " Italy, was but dream
0t merely dream bit ne rcB tJitHc Of ignorance Inc
CATHOLIC nations Of the would allow the pat
ruOny Of ~ Peter 10 pass after IL centuries OF posses
who bc NAV IL was Rome that the great Past which
Is called the Papacy must ABIDE ana apidc alone ING
Catholic world would never suffer u To bc otherwise, ana
italy only created for herself neNlcable embariass
ments by cingng 10 ga llca MM'h me VIII ~
Catholic nations would never sanction. lie w9.d
not speak of the prctensions Of the rovoutonsts;
generally speaking, these men were among the hTst
Victims Of their disorders There remained the thlId
nv pOthes and on tins what could the conference d0i
Take am give back an No. loIpai,' pIt ~ lehst ~
might maintain the present state oi nS seek to WHY
Le PontIaca Government la It's present position, ANA
find the means 81 doing 40 IN agriculture, commerce, aud
a good financial organization OF new resources After
some further the Archbishop said that tho
was that The senate should give the sanction Of its vote
10 these rcsolutlons Ihat u was desiable II possible,
tbnt te Pdutincal Government should he renstatcd In
ts lost provinces That II was necessary 10 ~ least
maintain tho existing situation s. To examine whether
ment more powerful vitality by Juflcious aud ener-
gec development Of ts resources such we're the wishes
~ those who signed the Interpolation He hoped the
Government would take that occasion 70 declare that "
would continue to follow UP the line 1t had adopted ana
mat the French troops should remain al Rome until the
securty OF the Holy See should be completely guaran-
The MARQUIS dc Moustier, Minister OF Foreign Affairs,
entered into reorganization Of the events that have oc
cured i'm Italy He believed there reason expect
much from the good and honesty Of the Italians ana
hoped that men who could give guarantees for judicous
and honorable conduct would come into power III such
case n would not be well for the Holy See TO upon
dissolution of Italian unity. II must rather look for
ward 10 the possibility Of living In community Of ideas
with Ialy-not indeed with the Italy Of MaEEn nor OF
GaTbadI nor OF Rattazl, but Italy. In reality
notLng easier 10 conceive by reference 20 the past
than italian Pope living the midst OF an honest ana
tran1n people without Tor that reason, FORGETTING hs
,ndcpendence and his dignity. What vas wanting 70
arrive al a solution OF Roman question not 70
much , facility OF compromise fundamental qles-
tons az sentiments OF reciprocal confidence between
ItaIy and the Papacy Hitherto there had boon mutual
distTust and be admitted that the part OF
The Holy See there very good for as
trusting Italy The French GOvern0ent assuredL
had not tho pretensOn 10 impose confidence; Is ofiI
sad that Il was necessary, nod that IL Was mo
ouly element OF tho solution. II vas necessary
fhen 10 wait and seek out for the Holy SEQ
new elements OF security aud for Ity The Of ksp
Ing her without offending her g5uyy prO3re, FROM tpo
dangerous line she has entered on WITH that View LAP
and precisely because she had rendered eat services 70
italy all pressure her part seemed burden ann sh
oficse her dignity; this was the sentiment OF ue u
man heart aud Italy shared H. II was for THIS reason
taf the hes: cOunsols France could not carry WIN
them the same authority those Of Powers lesS com