The Kenosha telegraph. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1860-1888, 1866-02-22

THE LIGHT DAwNING. Under this cap
ton the Green Bay fdUocate attempts TO bt
factious over what it is pleased to term
t-C Vigorous controversy going on between
j Senators Howe and Doolittle" We are no;
aware that it is thing unheard of that
distinguished men of the same party should
differ sometimes, as to the manner of arriv-
ing at common goal. The AdUocate man
ought certainly to have a little charity for
such differences of opinion, when he re
members that during a good share of the
time for the past four or five years, he has
himself been at loggerneads with many OF
the leading spirits of his party. We do not
now remember to have seen Union editor
in all that time growing facetious over his
controversy, or aiming sarcastic taunts at
his head because he differed with the lead
ers of his party.
After speaking of the Madison Journn ]
the Milwaukee Sentinel and other Republi
can papers and their course towards Sena-
tors Howe and Doolitte the Aduocate saws :
If anything were necessary for final clear
ing away OF any remaining cloud over the
matter, it is supplied by the Kenosha 7eLe
graph. That paper, having made careful
review OF the whole ground, announces
that 1t seems to US that the whole cues.
ton between our Senators really, is the
question Of time" This is not quite so clear
.,,l,,
yearning after the truth, could desire. Is
it question as to the time yet available
in the session for our Senators to make fur
Their and longer speeches, or, in the language
of the ring, is it the question, after the pow
erful Furnishing which they have given each
other, which will fail to come to ''time"and
have to throw up the sponge?
We pause for reply
Ii there is Democratic paper in the
whole northwest distinguished for fairness
and honesty, We have believed that paper
to be the Green Bay Aduocate. But we
look i'll vain for either honesty or fairness
i'll the above extract With all Difference
for the penetration of the editor of the Id
oOcGtc. we don't believe our meaning in the
words quoted in that extract is half so OBJ.
scure as he pretends to find it, We thought
much of the difference between our WORTHY
Senators was question of time" We
think so still Time" as to chen the
Rebel States should be considered re-organ-
lied, and their senators re-admitted to the
floor of Congress in all respects on an equal
footing with members from loyal States
Senator Howe Of course does not believe in
keeping the Rebel States in their pres ont
anomalous condition any longer thar in b;s
estimation, the best interests of the whole
country actually demand ,Ior doos San.
tor DOolittle advocate the. admission of mem
bers of Congress, b,!for. in HIS estimation
'i'o puoi'o -"teres would be promoted
thereby he question then might well be
one :" 4lME-i. e how long before the pub
'ic interests demand the admission of those
rlernbers from the late rebel States Sena-
tor Doolittle says at once, or as soon as the
necessary legislation can be had. Senator
Howe says let the people of the late rebel
States show works mete for repentance, and
! put away their rebelious and reasonable
feelings, as prerequisite to their represen-
tation in the national Legislature. Is there
not then question of TIME between our
senators, rather than disagreement as to
the end to be attained ? We fear the editor
of the ADVOCATE is not ''yearning after the
truth, SO much as he is yearniDg for such a
controversy between our Senator's. or their
supporters, as will once more throw the
prwer and patronage of the Government
into the hands Of the Democracy.