New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-01-29
Ole QJourts.
Cases Set for Trial This Day.
SUPREME COURT.

Lee, executor Of F. w. Lea; A. P. A. HelEer, in
teryenor sheaf and j. r. Jones, Races& Foster,
Bradley, E. T. Merricl, for appellants; A. Hennen,
D. N. Hennen, F. Perrin, for appellees
Alfred Hennen VS.. Mr. and Mrs. Puehe; A. Hen
men, propria persona, L. Ganin.
Succession Of W. Phillride w. a. Nelson, plain
tiff in rule, appellee, vs. o. Mullen, curator, ap-
pelant; r. K. Cutler, Thos. ]. Mccoy.
Geo. Tarleton vs.. Joshua James; L. II. Day, B.
P. Trabue. .s
John Kohn vs.. r. II. Short; clack, Bayne
s. Finney, E. Woodbridge. ,gs @
John Letten vs.. VIM. Bubridge; Emerson Il
Hunting propria persona, and McPheeters.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT.
The State vs.. Catherine Manning.
The State VS.. Edward Cox. @
SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
'Bassett VS.. Bassett; Eggleston and Hart, W. II.
Hunt. -
Succession of wife of DR.. Pension; Roselius
and Phillips G. Dufour, A. E. Schmidt.
| THIRD DISTINCT COURT.
| j. NJ. Beebe & Co. vs.. Kaiser & Bryan; E. W.
Huntington, Geo. s. Lacey.
Bank of Louisiana vs. VIM Moult; Miles Taylor,
E. W. Huntingdon. -
City, for use, ETC., Va. B. B. Pigniola, ct al; t.
/ H. Hewes, c. Dufour. sEss
Same vs.. same; same attorneys.
F. Perret vs. R. N. Davis, ct al; L. Castera, E.
w. Huntingdon.
A. B. Batsford VS.. ]. A. SHELTON; E. D. Craig,
D. c. Dible. z-sg
H. FrelIsen VS.. R. G. Cummings & Co.; Elmore
& King, Hays & Adams.
B. saley VS.. G. Correjolles Co.; C. E. Schmidt,
J. Neunier. y
4 Howell Rose vs. New Orleans Canal and Bank
ing Company; Gilmore & King, Bradford, Lea &
Finney. 4
1 FOURTH DISTRICT COURT. II
Mayer, Hoffman & Co.; vs.. A. D. Kelley & Co.;
E. Philips, T. L. Bayne.
Deposit Bank of Paris, Kentucky, vs. Rachel,
Nicholas and Sank J. o. Harrison, Witaker, Eel
lows & Mills, R. s. H. Mari, and R. Mott
Banker s. Co. va B. Ballard; a. Yoorhies pro
pria persona.
$ Lewis Jacob vs..J. G. Wade, W. B. Koonts
!, J. CurrelI.
Charlotte Levy vs.. H. Gilly Lea & Finney; A.
Derbes.
: Wilson & Young vs.. Bellocq, Noblem Co.; NJ.
Grivot, ]. L. Tissot.
: Mrs. E. Lessele vs.. Jules Benit P. IS. Sanchez
: & Victor Bennit, A. Derbes, A. Voorhies.
r. Thornhll vs.. Thos Murray & Co.; ]. r.
Il Currell, Semmes & Mott. ~ ess
Euclid Bonlan VS.. w. B. Whitehead; 7. L:
n Bayne, r. Il. Brown, Trudeau.
u W. Robinson vs. Hopkins q Bro; N. Il. Rghtor
9 L. Charyet. 4ess=t
Of Sarah E. Andrews VS.. DR.. c. G. Beard; Eggles
;, ton & Hart, C. E. Fenner.
g B. Mordeca VS.. II. Greenwood & Bro; Hyams
1T Labatt & Jonas, Reynolds 4 Davidson.
ri A. Montrose ys. A. A. Green; R. Mott, 7. S
OF McCay.
at B. S. Sanford and wife VS.. a. Desmare; semme
III & Mott, A. Pilot
&c A. Glenn vs. Thompson \ Barnes; g. =. Fenne'
ID e. w. Huntingdon.
ir Mrs. c. Shard, executrix, vs. j. s. and r. F
Il Neal; Harrison & Hunton, Eggleston & Hart.
Mayer, Hoffman g. Co. VS.. Wright & Allen; E
IN Philips, 7. L. Bayne.
v r, FIFTH DISTRICT COURT. s
ut Stern Brothers VS.. ThRrnhill and Richardson
i'd Whitaker Fellows and Mlns, Foute and Helm.
'h Charles Bartine vs.. Jennings and Dodge; Hewe
in and Eustis, Whitaker, Fellows and Mills. sGs
an Joseph Lalande, Testamentary Executor. VS. B
ed Toledano, Taylor, ct. ais. Cyprien Dutour Ogdel
IS and Claiborne ~. ,I5 ,r "A E6,i!s
G. William Hunt vs. J. NJ. Stone, ct ais; Whitaker
nd Fellows and Mills, George s. Lacey.
ne Joseph Garner VS.. Rosch; G. L. Bright, Z
Hiestand. -s sra.s. ..s5-4 II
us E. H. Lehman vs.. N. O. j. u. q. N. K. X; j.
he Hornor, Hays & Adams
he SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
I'd Jacob Barker vs.. A. Ross and A. B. Speed
raj propria persona ;.Gurleysa
ut L. Doucourt vs.. M. D. Legion; CambraJ
ed Coleman.
on W. W. Leake vs.. Fellows & Co.; E. s. Oliver
for Semmes Mott.
eh ]. W. Warren VS.. G. L. Kouns u Bro; Hays an
in Adams, Singleton and Harde. tH
'as N. A. Baumgefden VS.. G. Kaiser ct ais; L. Ca
he terra, c. E. Schmidt
We, A. Drer vs. H. Gilley Co.; Tissot, Derbes.
ed Jas. Alexander VS.. A. Cohn; Dalsheimer al
she Buck defendants in propria persona.
ent. D. Blum vs. H. A. Bonham; s. L. Levi,
ce, Philip, V. 8. and j. B. Cotton, G. L. Bright.
, a D. Blum VS.. Mere Oldenburgh; Dalsheime
up Dirheimer. 1 A5NF
es. NJ Simon VS.. A. Adler; Bower and Dillinghar
,ck Dalsheimer, Bradford Lea Il Finney and Mil
He Taylor.
al, E. t. Parker VS.. Raymond Mix; Morgan, Gran
it's mont.
, w. R. Adams VS.. Wm. E. Leverich; Hays
OK Adams, Salisbury. -
fdc Mcguire & Campbell VS.. stoddart Howell; Gu
me A. Breaux H. G. Miller.
ac- Emapuel Stewart VS.. Mr. M. C. Vale; Roseli
hat s. Phifl III Buchanan.
ers Joseph Goetznger ct ais. vs. Peter Forshee al
,lic W. F. Hodgkin T. L. Lemley, Huntingdon.
oks Same VS.. Same same attorneys.
the Bernhard Heebe VS.. G. Hebe A. Hebe, E.
the Wench, 7. l.. Lemley.
ent C. Wetrigan, administrator, vs. E. Lasser; ].
,le Hornor, A. Pilot
Md e. Macarty vs. Wright & Allen; Tissot, Clarke
uld Bayne.
ter Solomon, Dessommes & Go. VS.. R. W. Estlin
ass Co.; Tissot, Stansbury
at F. p Duconge vs.. Hughes, Hyllested Cc
ous Beverley & Bryan, Eggleston & Hart.
he D. E. Goicoura g. Co. vs.. H Stackhouse; ].
ser. Tissot, Folte, Hays.
,rse Levi A. Dowley vs.. j. E. Putnam 4 Co.; Tore
me- L. Buisson.
VI AN ABSURD DIspLAY.-The most absurd displ
ling in the Latin line which we have lately seen, "
hat the apparent attempt of a clergyman, in pray
nse at recent celebration, to make the dead lang
IN ges Ineligible to the Almighty. He said:
sa I'VE thank thee, O Lord, that these, onr friel
ign were thus permitted to die in battle for d,lce
the deoofuns est pro pat,'ia nori-which means Il
the it is sweet and honorable to die for ones countr
- 1t is very evident that the Reverend gentien
addressed his prayer to his audience rather than
the his Lord.
Il