New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-03-16
Ghe Courts.

\ 95'Ss.t55 .,s-. -i=T
Ghr Courts.
i Cases Set for Trial This DAY.
4 u. NJ. Tupery VS.. Thos. Kaiser and the Jefferson
City Railroad Company-G. Schmidt, McCaleb
/ Holland. Fellows.
/ II E CRIMINAL COURT. a55f-5 .a,7.
4 The State VS.. Walker. 5.F5 <,
The State vs.. j. Hennessy.
The State vs.. John Miller.
/ The State vs.. Lawrence Kaufman. &
/ The State VS.. John Louis. 44a sa5
The State vs.. F. P. Smith. e
I The State VS.. 4. Mahony.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
Sheriff ct. ais. vs.. E. Shif.-Morgan. spofford
Clarke h Bayne.
1 Succession Of E. A. Henken-C Campbell. Wal
/ lace, Livaudais. MI "a ast te f@
Succession of Heess-Bradford Land. Williams
i Durant & Hornor.
S Citizens Bank vs.. succession of Rugely-Clarke 6
| Bayne. Durants& Hornor. #52$@& III.
\ Succession of Thos. j. Pipkin-Egan. Whtake,
| Fellows & Mills. Buchanan & Gilmore. Collens
Wallace. Bright. Olivier.
Succession Of John Il. Barlage-C ollens
| Browne. III 4S#
Succession Of Elisha Cox-Dirhanxner Lacey
| Whitaker. Fellows u Mills. j. D. Augustin.
1 THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
ID. Davis VS.. d. w nlteSlde--IlSsOt. IT,, .u.
Rickerts vs.. n. o. Seamens Home-Cohen
Bubb, r.sa. N
| APPEALS JUSTICES COURTS.
J. Donovan vs. Dillon & Dnsmore-Field &
shackleford. Whitaker, Fellows & Mills.
| d. a. Yorke VS.. w. L. Cozzens-Craig. Saucier
| w. H. Holmes vs.. j. Norwood Kennard
| Emerson & LeBreton.
Mrs. Tracy vs.. COPELAND and wife-Bradford
Robinson.
E. flanagan vs. G. Fahrman-saucier. Belden
. H s0pr I'm ava InfZ rrlatcr F,Dl
W. De Dopff & Co. vs.. A. D. Garcia-H A.
Morse. Mehdiveri. t51S
A. r. Clarke vs.. Capt. Parmele-Mix & Robin.
John Marks vs. II. Alent-Phihps s. Levy. EN-
erson & Grow.
p. West vs.. r. S. Ransom-van Dolson,
Bradford Field & Shaekleford
Mcdonald & McGraw VS.. j. Flanagan ct al
John MCGEE. p ". Collens.
McCan 4 Howell VS.. Powers & Co.-Egan.
Howard. &@s ES13@@
g. Fannin vs.. ]. Comford-Pro per. H. C.
Miller
F. G. Chamberlain VS.. City of New Orleans
Tully. Hewes.
E. Hannegan vs. G.. Fahrman-saucier. Pro.
per.
A. JOLIET vs. J. Avet-Budd D. Augustin.
Brannigan and wife vs.. Bracely and wife
O'Neil. Coleman.
P. Bernard VS.. F. j. Otis-Coleman. Cohen,
Clement u Pohlman VS.. N. Farler--Wenck
Maybin.
s. Pent VS.. Stanley s. Standardization j.
P. Horror. '@f
E. NJ. Hickok VS.. Carter & Doyle-Buisson.
Randolph, Singleton & Hardie.
Nine. Fagot VS.. A. Montgomery-Burthe & Tru-
deau. Olivier & Trist.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
EXCEPTIONS ri
+ Nixon & Co. VS.. H. Gilly s. Co.-Hays & Adams.
Dutour. *' R @-
Mrs. Tompkins vs.. H. j. Raphael--Buohanan &
Gilmore. Eggeston Hart.
a. B. Mitchell VS.. W. B. Haynes-Bonner s Dill
lingham. W. B. Haynes. N
Charles shackelford VS.. r. sinnott, owner Of
B. IS Hodge Field McCay.
! \. Il. Davis, j., vs. John F.nn-Clarke & Bayne.
y r. Menzesheimer VS.. Moses Marx-T. J. & W. III.
Cooley. Phillips & Levy.
Burns y Shatier VS.. Viosca & Irwin--Long.
Howard III
Macorm & steptoe executors, vsRDr. w. N.
Mercer-Semmes N Mott. Campbell & Spoford,
Hunt q Denegre. al SIT
Lorin Chapman VS.. New Orleans, jackson and
Great Northern Railroad Company-Marr & Foute.
ID. M. Hennen. G s35& z
a5s FIFTH DISTRICT COURT. 81
RULES,
. Croker, Hazel q Morton vs.. Comezys, ct ais
Breaux, Fenner, LeoVy. Cutler, Bond, Miller.
CASES
Joseph Bloom VS.. Charles Hodges-McCay.
Taylor. ss lS1- ET7 IN
Thomas g. Anderson VS.. Elliott & McKeeyer-
Levy. Huntington. . 55 5i
James Fl. Gibbons vs.. j. u H. Perkins ct ais
Brown. Clarke & Bayne. 6 X
John b King vs.. Huston HubbelI & Co.-Whita-
ker, Fellows Mills. Clarke Bayne.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
. NJ. B. Nixon, ct. al, vs. G.. Houillon-Alil
Buchanan, Hoalon.
~. Szymanski vs.. s. Plas an-Morgan Il New.
Tissot. 81 5s1s5
3. Lasere vs.. A. & Rochereau 4 Co., ct ais
VOORHEES,. Magne. Taylor.
1 =. Lasere vs.. A Dolphini ct als.-Voorhies
Mayne a. Taylor. IL sl175
!, VIM VT, Mthof vs.. Byrne y Vance Roselias &
Phillips. +. Briggs,
Peter Marcy vs. Merchants Mutual Insurance
Co,--Buehanan y Gilmore and Pierce. Durant
Hornor
Peter Marcy vs.. Citizens Mutual Insuranc
o.--Buehanan Gilmore and Pierce. Durant &
Horner.
a Husson vs. Charles Watingant-Der Du.
four.
2. G. Thomas vs.. Thompson 4 Barnes-Morgan
& New. Huntington.
$4 ---T----r-7--- - \ S------------ III E}
NEGRO ABUSE OF THE PaEs1pENr.-Fr Doug
lass, the negro, is now perambulating the country
denouncing the President as traitor, and pre-
dieting another civil war if his people' are de-
lied their rights. Since Chief Justice Chase went
down to this Negroes level, aud introduced him to
q public audience, and afterwards dined with him.
has put on an air of pompous Importance
and has permitted his tongue to indulge in the
greatest iiherty Of very insolent speech. At
Chicago, last week, he addressed large meeting
Of Republicans, who applauded him to the echo.
Ii the course Of his lecture he said:
But the government has been tried by treason,
'ebelon and ASSASSINATION, and yet remains to be
tried by traitor hlacker than Jefferson Davis. |
Sensati0n.9 Vet. despite the hell. black treason
sonder at Washington, the government stood and
would stand. His faith was in the omnipotence Of |
ruth, the enlightened Judgment of the loyal
,eople. and the Congress of the United States. |
Applause IS S5g s l5sf{ a S 5is5i II f8 |
He saw with sorrow the eagerness with fwhih [
ONE so-called Republicans were clasping the red I
ands of traitors, and the eagerness with which
Tiers were asking the country to forget the deeds
/ traitors, and to- forget the services of their
.iends. He did it because they were in terrible
risis,i where a bloody baptism might come He
'as certain they were on the edge of a chasm,
eeper and more terrible than the one they had D
scaped. They were being Tantonly BETRAYED
ito the hands of their enemies. There were Two
aiis yet between them and the catastrophe
engress, and the other the people. Nsi33sss Il
THE sriTcH made BY the Wilcox h Gibbs Sew
g Machines is unexceptonable, and superior
zen to handspring, being stronger and more
autifHl. Can be seen at No. 5 St, Charles street.
III rs gsEa 49, ------E1 =
The Philadelphia Ledger says that the white
nee iutnriuffno he than III