The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1866-11-22

70 HIN uAneheer)
sssigs sss: ~ HELEN beg PIX a1 sn The money
~ mai ss mission. though he would NOT Be certain
abcss ~ Ss1ne,,g Of the commission but thought
s. Ss sS.s there % three Or four .ransas.IOns which
:sS.ss. y ~. y; s sss ss:s
I, g; n, o S:.sSss ID 81 = Know ss
ped over into Jaw Cookies scg enough step
back and gave him the money. -'' ~" s'''
instances he ga Cd t Ky % yoa substance that in
Baocoek immediately 20 jaw Cooke coz a. Yes o'd I
,eeoascs oens W. particular in asking him wha; com.
but there he said he sold them to Jay Cooke Co.,
y, that he had paid for the bonds
coupons that he had not effected sale Of them9 A
No; be did not say anything about that at all. -.
AFFIDAVIT OF Mr. RUFUS L LORD.
After considerable delay Mr.. Rufus l. Lord made his
appearance and offered the following aihdavit-
Rufus L Lord, las Exchange Place being duly sworn,
tho First ward city Of New York county Of New York,
was feonously taken and stolen and caried away from
namely, quantity Of United States bonds SECURITIES,
eonssslpg Of 20 bonds 10 and Gao bonds AMOUNT
~ e S & e.. sS e. s.ss ss % g.
LIS being 10 coupon bondg Of 5000 each Of the
Issue Of June ed August Is 1894 ard that the bonds
bonds stolen Aforesaid he property q The depo.
that iaid property fconiousy taon stolen and
Iiea away. BY some person or persons nov unknown
Of ss aS soo, Doc
bonds which were stolen from tSs dsponsSt was sold
Jourdsn the said HELEN sys 10 received tho same from
formed admits giving said bonds and securities To said
HELEN to SELL RUFUS l. LORD.
TESTIMONY or RUFUS L LORD
Mr. r. L Lord was cross.examined by Mr. o. L. Stew
ART, whom the following facts were elected IL had
complete st Of the numbers Of the bonds az the bonds
bers; never sold the bonds; that book is how In my
Once; those entries in the early part were generally
but have got e interest and can 90 and get Tho nun
ben now from the sub-TreAsury; they pay one interest
y so sOS Or
pendent OF that memorardum could not recoiect the
numbers Of the bonds; when the printed cir
brother different parties compared it with the book;
1t made from entries my book; didn't compare
out and sent 70 bankers here and in Europe paid The
bills for this, $751; they have been proved by others
those bonds spss, about three or four months sso:
there $780, Of the seven.thirty bonds which
were returned; don't know who sent them 70 me; i
twenty miles from Newbufyport; they were obtained
from the thieves; ] don't know who made the bargain
were except that one was named He'd Anns; there
another affidavit made before; got tho money from
some person In Boston; don't recolloct who handed
them TO my brother, probably ho Is in my office
don't know where he got them; could not toll the
number q these bonds without referring TO books in my
Office; have made affidavit before in regard to the
coupons and bonds; have not made several: think
none but that one and the above; made one here
paid attention whether any parties were arrested on
the charge Of stealing theee bonds.
Direct examinnton-ln my affidavit OF November
don't recocct whether compared the INST checked of
with those In book; A. least compared them here
myself; had memorandum from my book here and
compared them all before put them my affidavit,
which have not tho slightest doubt is correct
A number of other questions were asked on these
subjects but nothing materially different from the sbove
adduced.
At the request Of Mr. q L. Stewart the further
animation was adjourned until Friday next at hafpast
one o'clock.
RAIL REFUSED.
The counsel for the prisoners made an earnest appeal
10 Justice Bowling to accept ball for the prisoners which
he peremptorily refused.
JAY COOKE AND co.
ExJudge Stuart In some remarks stated that there
was quite as much reason for the OF Jay Cooke
Co.. as for that OF bis client, Frank Heller who had
acted frankly and confessed ALL doubt Jay Cooke
would under similar circumstances, whom he believed
as much involved In the matter as his client.
The District Attorney stated that he simply there
to represent tho people and 10 see there Joint
AFFIDAVIT made against HELEN Babcock for the crime
OF larceny, whether there evidence sufficient to
hold the parties 10 the face Of ths adavit although
glad to prisoners acquitted whom guilt WIS proven
be compelled to urge the pros culion against the
prisoners until their innocence Of the charge made
apparent. II Jay Cooke Co. shown to be impl.
Gated he would be against them but until that he
for them.
After further discussion, pending which the &C
cused was remanded, the court room was cleared
-.----