New Orleans daily crescent., 1866-02-20
The Courts.


4 sugar in 1860. @ a5 y.- ~.
| Ole Courts, ...=
/ Gases Set for Trial This Day.
i UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT. E4'
Garvey Omly Co. vs.. Thomas ong-Darant q
Hornor. Tory. HF9
/ SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
DIN. Hennen vs. W. r. Hieronymus- Pro. per.
i Lemley. t-6
Lorin Chapman ys: Thomas E. Mathews-D N.
Eennen. R. 81. Browne. '% %
/ James Bri1geford VS.. s. s. Simonds and Cotton
& Baldwin,. Saucier. Egan and Fellows &
Mills. b. 5s5 - f.
/ P. H. Atwater s Co. VS. Cotton & simonds-
Egan and Fellows & Mills. Durant 6 Hornor.
BridEeford 81 Co. VS.. Cotton, Baldwin & J.
Simonds-A. Saucier. Egan and Fellows & Mills.
/ Ashford & Addison VS.. Hillery Edwards-D. N.
| Hennen. E, F. Russell.
Joseph Lallande VS.. VIM. P. Hope-E. P. & G.
A w. Ellis. D. N. Hennen. 81
i Henry Cooper, sr., vs.. A. Galatis, sherif-D. N
1 Hennen, j. T. Martee, B. Edwards. G. A. Penn,
Alf Hennen. H. G. Miller.
Citizens Bank Of Louisiana, appellee, vs.. j.
Payne and D. Gilman, appellants-A. Pilot. HES.
/ tand, v. +. g. J. B. Cotton. .s
4 CRIMINAL COURT.
4 The State VS.. Henry JONES' larceny.
\ The State vs. Charles Kemper, larceny.
The State VS.. Nelson, colored, larceny.
/ The State VS.. James Walker, carrying concealed
4 a dangerous weapon. fo4.
1 The State VS.. Harry E. Cotton, carrying CON
cealed weapons. T z.-.-
| The State VS.. William Pfefsr, assault and bat
i terry. '
/ SECOND DISTRICT COURT. g ST. a.
Succession Of IA. Quintal - Gran dmont. E.
/ Hunt. G 81 .44gqt l' fsi -f.....
/ lGautherin VS.. Picciotto--Pitot.
4 e. L. E. Bonnet vs.. Catherine Hyams-Dufour.
4 Whitaker, Fellows g. Mills
| Jean Lerethe vs.. r. 81. Read and Beaumont, Jr,
GMiis.5 $50 ~ ,', - \ ''-''.',' 49,
Jean Lerethe VS.. Fl. McGuinn- and ]. G. Stewart.
Tissot, Dufour, Frazier. Whitaker, Fellows &
Mills. ioHq s5g. aJ
II. D. White vs.. Guilot- Morel. Drouett.
f THIRD DISTRICT COURT. o. e., ~,
u ta !4-t5. "a. RULES M ar.
:, Schmidt 8 zeigler vs.. Recorder Of Mortgages;
1. saloy, syndic, VS.. J. Albrecht; g. E. Schmidt,
Dnfour. = 41 ..1aga lfS.s.s = e.. -,yI Il :
Houston vs.. Mason 4 Glider; Phillips & Cotton,
Sheldon & Pardee.
& uNAPPEALABLE CASE.
7 y. Mcdonald vs.. Patrick Hayes; Budd. Dufour.
I ORDINARY ArPEALARlE CASES. 5T3
I y. b. Delaney vs. ]. Levi; Sheldon & Pardee,
Billings. n 1S49& .GjE .t4 @
@. D. Miller VS.. Schneider & Zuberbier; Hunt
Mclean & Church VS.. Steamer Arizona Lacey.
VIM. H. Hunt i'..'s -'l5r E5g q 92tat r7t
w. Offutt ct al vs.. Hubbard & Levi; H. G. Mil
Ter: Race y Foster and E; 7. Merrck. =,
John G. Stewart vs.. His Creditors; D1rant 4
Hornor. Bayne and Gernon f- w
RR FOURTH DISTRICT COURT. #"nN
x ( 4Fr stFi9 RULES, "atGlA4 ll.NG %
JAS. W. Goslee vs.. Jas. W. Robb, ct ais -Har.
rison g. Hunton. Sheldon & Pardee. ,-...s.
Jean Lapassade VS.. Mitenberger, ct als.-Col.
lens. Hewes & Eustis. Beatty & Miltenberger.
John Wilson vs. Recorder of Mortgages-Reynes.
Proprid PERSONA. 1a7dp,Bl -irs-4 81
H,.lE.d4 EXCEPTION s.,s
r. r. Montgomery & j. A. White VS.. W. Fl.
Dnnbar-Buchanan & Gilmore. Hewes r
CONTINUED CASES ,e Is
John I. Adams VS.. steamer Trent-Taylor.
Clark q Bayne.
{ Hortense Soule, widow, VS.. Gourdis g. Martin
Rghtor. Castera & Grima. 63 1'ls 'Ga !
II fstA NEW CASES. Ht al., "01, u
John Easton, syndic, VS.. J. W. Goslee--Van Dol
son. w. I'll. Hunt t s.s.-,
John Eaton VS.. Sister Martha Candida-Van Dol.
son. Ad. Rozier. CHt
Catherine Mcclure, widow and tutrix, vs.. P. j.
MCGUIRE e-Buchanan Il Gilmore Breaux & Fen
Ia, H. Walk vs.. G. F. Hatcher Kennedy & Mills.
Koontz. TT
k Louise King vs.. J. A. Baquie-H. c. Miller L.
F. g. Mahan VS.. R. Tramontana -Handlin A.
Il. Tssot '3' l'7i9 u"
John B. Powers VS.. victorine Foley Sheldon &
Pardee. j. E. Morse llI f. 5r emq
S.,N. Pike, ct ais, VS.. G. Doyle g. Co.-Clarke &
Bayne Whitaker, Fellows & Mills.
i y . g. =
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
E. G. Wood vs.. =. H. Elmer s Co.-Miles Tay-
lor. Roselus a. Phillips. sss H s
M 80 IT uNAPrEALABLE CASES.
E. D. White vs. Pontchartrain Railroad Co. ct
als.-Morel. Briggs & Mechinard.
Consolidated Association of Planters of La. vs..
s. B. Smith y co... Lavergne. Michel & Kooutz
and Gilmore King.
NJ. NJ. & S. G. Kennedy vs.. Leontine Caziels-J
NJ. Dirrhainmer j. IL. Tissot.
Michael Gernon vs. Sarah, A. Trawick-Dufour.
Whitaker, Fellows Mills. ~.
H. Whitaker ys. l.. w. Dodge--Cambray
Sheldon q Pardee.
Captain B. Elder VS.. Captain and owners of
schooner Fancy-Planchard. Du Buisson, cura-
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
@ @ MAsDAMus CASE. nv t 1e
State of Louisiana on relation of A. NJ. Holbrook
VS.. Hugh Kennedy, Mayor, ct al-Alex. Walker
Miles Taylor y Cooley. $3.50. d. = ..s
saml Shook vs.. 1. fsE fhsns Murtapb
Vicente Forne VS.. A, P. yalencia-sambola &
Ducros. 9. 3. Schmidt. Egs4. C.E
J. Bourdelle VS.. J. Conion-Grandmont & Ca
nonge Buchanan u Gilmore. s'Healf
Lehman Schwartz & Co. VS.. Marx Israel-Dal-
sheimer Il Buck. J. L. Tissot.44 y g9.geqg
James Anderson vs.. A. de Monasterio, ct ais
g. Grillier vs. G. Betheze, ct al.-Lyneh. Red
mond. AZ ~ iEla lol ~ 4ir1
Jos. Soils vs.. Mary Frizoyich ct ais -Sambola &
Ducros. Field s. Shackeiford .s5.f...-,
W. Dickerson vs. Jas. Williams -Earhart and
Ferguson. Defendant in person. 7H 2l ~
\ City of New Orleans svs.J .R. Blanchard -Hewes.
j. l.. Tissot. fNY. - .L M r4H tf5i.fa
City Of New Orleans vs.. G, Walsh -Hewes.
Bud1 u Lambert. '"
7 City % New orieansys n. A. Llambias- -Hewes.
Sainbola 81 Ducros. setE6 y r. l.s !Ftl53l 81 y n
ghes. Droaett ys. J, a, Lacrosse Pro. per.
CoiIens. t#14 4@
81 supRrxE r-eospENsEpspEcrsIoNs.
90 Qa1 azsrossiBILIry OF EsSKnEfsas. s,tsi5t ~
s.E. wpodworth vs.. Morse & Moore-Appeal