New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-04-04

Barley Mitchell, B. P. Callaghan, Lawrence
Kaufman, ID. Mahoney, Pat. Connolly, Pat @ Brien
and Murphy.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
NJ Duchamp vs.. Porte Castera, B. & G. Rozier.
j. Webb VS.. Harlowe Lamb G. Miller. G.
d. Fenner
Sparks vs.. Boulgny& Harang-J. D. Augustin,
A. N. Ogden. johnson d Denis, Morgan d
q Peter Doyle VS.. Whitehead Howard. G. i.
Bright
MI THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
All Mckenzie vs.. n. B. Bell-Buchanan \ Gilmore.
ri. E. Holland.
b. j. Ker V: j. +. Rub Eggleston. Whitaker,
Fellowes & Mills.
s..s Loeb va. Loeb ct ALT. j. g. W. H. Cooley,
Sullivan, Billings 4 Hughes. t
j. Domingo vs. Louisiana Mutual Insurance Co
Hunt Bayne. Briggs q Davidson.
]. Domingo VI. Merchants Insurance Co.-Hun
& Bayne. Pierce u Castera.
s. G. Hickey vs. Cole, Saunders 4 Co.-Dalshei
z1er Buck. F. Landreaux.
Martha NJ. Hackley W.. Geo. Ingram-S. r
bGlen. Bernos, Delahussaye, Bartlett.
easss FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
Wv William Golding vs.. steamer @. Castro-W Fl.
! Hunt. Geo. l. Bright.
Mary G. Shaw vs.. ARENAS Hill ct al-Hennen s.
Childress. Morse q Lacey.
r. HI. Collins VS.. q. Sabatier- Handlin. Grima.
X tfffSs FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
a. AZ MontreiuI wife of P. e. Witt, VS. her hus-
ii band, on rlle--T. y. 4 W. H. Cooley.
ped Jean Lacaze va. ]. iViosca, on rule-E. Cam
bray, I. Drouet. MI ssr l&s
Nj williams vs.. Bryan s Irwin, On ule-Bright.
Bonner b Dillingham;.
ses Castanedo VS. Robert, on rule-Belden & Fuse
,lier. Tissot ]. a.. Dejean. Cutler u Hawkins.
d. G. Nerwin VS.. New Orleans and Bayou Sara
Mail Go Whitaker, Fellows & Mills. Morgan &
"a Robert u. Duplantier & Dant-- Robt. LIE
Gardeur. Bermudez. us, n ii &
Mrs. Louise Risbourg vs.. her husband-E. & G
Morel. s.. Lambert.
IS Mary q. Heaiy VS.. j. K. Murphy, her husband.
r. L.sLemley. T. Il. Howard.
Alex. 7. Steele vs.. Henry Blood--Steele p. p
Chas. Janin. .f
Jacob Wiss ct ais vs.. Bower, Garner Harrison
w. "A. Riggs. Bright.
SaE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
80 Wifeof p. Tricou, executrix. VS.. Keenan,
Suearinger Bright. Bradford, Lea Finney.
Capt. Elder, Joublanc ct al vs.. schooner Fam
ct ALL blanchard.
L. vallee, Joublanc ct al. vs. schooner Fam,
sud owners Derbes, blanchard. Cutler 4 Haw
kins, Fuselier. sfaFs
Il Jonblanc vs. the same -Derbes.
M. B. Nixon ct. al. va. 3. Standardization.
supREME COURT or LOUISIANA. g
Introduction of Rostle Rochan-J. Bull, admins
TRAITOR vs.. ]. a. Lamage u r. Binnon-L. Oastera
G. Dupiantier.
- Pierre Longis vs. his creditors and the creditor
of s. B. Gratian \ Gos-Wms Il. Hunt. Roselius
sT''ThoYnas Edward, curator, vs. RiceC. Ballard
sBtocker & Steel. NJ. VOORHEES,, q. Bermudez
Sparrow & Snider and II. N. Spoford,
III. L. Gratia, Syndic of the creditors of s.
Eratia q Co, vs.. N. r. Bell and G. Ingram-J.
Tiss0t. L. Castera.
sss 4. Pecouet vs. jean Ange -Saucier s. VOORHEES,
Derbes. A
Schmidt. Whitaker, Fellows Il Mills.
r. Johnston, Executor, vs.. Shepherd Brown.
Ill. Tissot. Durant and Hornor.
10 UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
Il United States vs.. steamer T. S. Connolly
Attorney. Durant and Hornor.
Molar freres, VS.. z. O. Bouvis-A. Robert y
- Hunt s-.----
I'd A,young man who, before the war, had be,
IA salesman In q Louisville house, went into +
rebel army fought all through the war; and W
finally surrendered with Johnston's army. He d
mot return TO Louisville, but thought he would pr
hfer seeking employment in some city where he W
not 50 well known, and therefore came to VI
cinnat. N 5s, s. :.
q "a; After diligent search he found prominent d
goods merchant who was In need OF SALESMAN
hscpntract was entered into at once. The youn
man knew that the merchant had been intensel
ioyai during the war, and that he had given large
of hls ample means to the sanitary commission
40 as ether benevolent objects for the support
;the war, and therefore very naturally desired
hconceai the fact that he had been in the reb,
Amy ~ o Ss, asy however couple Of merchant
~ osxtth " Olc III tne store repien1S1ilE the
stock and remembered the Young man, Who, i
turn, recognising them, tried 10 avoid coming
contact with them. S - $
In this be failed; for the gentlemen. bayin
concluded their purchase, asked our merchant
they had not seen salesman in the store name
DIT Being informed that = young man Of Ii,
name was there employed, they informed the me-
chant somewhat Of his history and shortly ATE
aWsfd departed. The young man was soon ys,
kunl1rh COMPOUNDED at receiving MESA &c that II
aprosence was desired in the Office" with son
iasrvopsness and equal fear he entered the ofiic
hut With the determination TO put as good ia
,1oa The matter as he could. The merchant spok
Have you been in the rebel army ~ = Yes, eli
said Dr.. You are probably well acquaint
III the South ~ said the merchant. Being
swered in the affirmative, the merchant continue
Increase yeur salary Ave hundred as ID dolars "a
III fIe Southern Statesn This is the only one
susny-very many INSTANCES where rebel sold
procure desirable positions, as Front, MAN, Fou
and Fifth Streets are full of them. They attr
Southern trade. Basil Duke and "a brother of Jc
Morgan have commission and produce house
Fourth street, and are doing splendid bqsine
tSprngfeld Republican