New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-07-12

- " y Dniiia IN ~ =" TlseL' TTt
war? "ot' 5ou o0'ns O'i010 'it'
HFtnesS-A little of everything.
hec0rder-Are you sure you sold this paper
OeigIs T5E.s,I tne war
BecoTtJe,,- ~Wern Won a'' evor !, tba sbinnara,
Press?
! Wttness-Never.
I'ecoFa@'--Get down, sr; mats enough !
| knew, yGn a nov ,ici,ina cottnn abnnt tbe press
The u,itnass iaft the etard aa diracted Two mr.
three other gentlemen in court. beside the re.
corder. identified him aa how named Major. a
slave of a Mr.. Wilson. at the fine the war broke
ont and emnIoved ahout the sbin1ers' Press az
remembered bv the recorder.
William Kearns s,oorn-Is in the same business
as Mr.. Deisler. Sold the same paper before the
var war. II was then called the F." "Joker's budget
added ta f5e neme W{reapsJ pJ ont tho naner con-
ceaed in his establishment. Did not expose it,
because he did not wish ladies to see it, Was for
merry partner oil hr' Delsler'
lnis closed the teshmony on ootn sloes' MI
oampola waved the opening argument
hr' Duyighaud said that the lay on this SUBJECT
sNouta De carefully administered, SO as NOT 10 IN
'eileEe WIN Ine hoerty OF the press ne Sam
papers every uay, In "hlch hlf JohnSoh tle Fiesi'
uent anu 'ne greatest 0! heh' was delamed scahda-
iousiy' ye' no one 'hough' OF prosecuting the
Fenaois VI u4oSe papers u shouiu oe SHOWN 70
'lI"s 'ne ciy oroinahee haa Deen Vlolateo'
''"' VIC P0Dii'"siOn ""' ini"inou9, was seaHu"l'
ati" tLaV H"u "'y peeu pioFeu' as 10 'hs lioel II
oholu pe prove" tnat tne accu9e0 PIlVeu 'ne aFti'
cie' of' III Vne "oluS Vi 'ls law, Puollsneo IT,
ne was uoV lne PRIMER or Pnohsher' lie merely
solu tne paper. aialce Snoa'd aso oe proved, OF
'ne oa'e lSs Ili' as 'neEe eouo De no ll0eI WIN
ou' llaiice' ou' LhaiIce was noV proved macoQ
dla hoI understand hhgHsA; ne only understood
FRENCH anu Whatever msht be SAID OF MN IN
E.nslISn' u could neitner wound or inJore MN
,I lh0i9 aho.neL eAelient ol lIel was "ah'As'
in"' was 0Ie ID" mr. Du''sn@0a SAID Sueh MAS
'He s'@S u MS ueieIse'
MI 0"nipola "ouiu ho' lmPugn 'ne ihteh'genee
ot tne court SO Iar as 70 argue mat the publ
| cation came GhoeF lhe prohlblIon OF the clty
~ gLoinaH0e aS op7eehe' ScanoalouS ana immoral
Inc maximum Ane lLlposeo III sueh case was ohe
Goiiais' anu ne Wouiu asa '14I tne Aighes'
PeH"'sy 'Ae Jaw De Ihnictea lor such an outrage
u pupllc oeceney' ana SO infamous disregard OF
pupHc Morals.
az 10 Ine !ioel cases ne woula ASH that they ne
seh' 10 tne district court Tor tflai' a man who
@oula circulate sucn SANDERS ana opsceniues was
| ihsehsiole 70 shane, Mr' Maeou could scarcely
nave oeen Otalled lor snootlng at s'gnt the mia
NOUS man WING coala' 70 make dollaf or t"o'
ereuIaIe such olsgusung SANDERS upon law
P9ln's 'ne argument lor tne defense naa no merit
Whatever NANCE was manifest IN the character
ana opleet OF the pp0hcauon' Ihere was the
PROOF OF It, 10 Puohsn' IN the legal sense was
not merely pFinung' a man might print or write
aHq W. not paphsh. 10 publish was to utter, to
maze known % tne world me accused having
solo ana issued tne paper was publisher OF the
hoeH
II was the auty OF the courts TO enforce rlgldly
the Jaw against such onenders' Inc papers elrcu