New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-03-29
- aNUrHERysTo.r

En- 'ss - ANorRERysTo. ssss
The President, as the telegraph apprises us, has
vetoed the civil rights bill lately passed by
Congress. This result wassnot unexpected. It
was kiadred measure to the freedmen 9 burean
bill which the President vetoed, and, irso re-
4 spect, at least far. more objectionable he
length of time which elapsed before the President
acted On 1t was suggestive of the veto which has
been made. sa 4 ~ e RsS9
II viii be reoollected that the constitutional
Il amendment abolishing slavery had a second sec.
/ ton. apparently harmless, but which has really
eiver, rise to both of the bills which the President
vetoed. The first section provided for the aboli
/ ton OF slavery. The second provided that Con,
| gress should have power to enforce the freedom
lpf the slave by appropriate Legislation. " The
expression was very vague one--and it was
feared that under the latitudinous construction q
the Constitution which has prevailed at Washing
ton Of late years, it might be made to cover al
sorts of wicked and dangerous, Legislation. Wher
the Convention of Mississippi came to vote OF
Unconstitutional amendment, very strong objec
ton was made to that section. III South Caro-
Inns, also, the feeling of apprehension was SC
saIora - ,,ra,. s.-ss. =
raa,,v r,san+ go ]. H.,
81. -,
- same ~. ~ ~
M arav,,
and that south CAROLINA had better Accept ne
a,ng ,,,a,,t 1870, ~, IL,
| The result has shown that the apprehensions on
the subject were well grounded ,TAesssouthern
Il ~ z1 %bnt,,s
conventions almost unanimously approved the
constitutional amendment decaratory thereof.
But thew we're fearful Of that appropriate egis-
lIafion ,,c,apse Ill ia f;me. They dreaded-awhat
.I... ls-.-a.s Il, rart. af Wild ora rool
NE esehe mas pfoYed-a-Ai Soiss au1 ieoA-
less legislation under . conshtational clause SO
vague The first fruit Of It was the freedmens
h,raa lii, +ba neyt tj,e civil rights h;llneitber
-, a. r,a,,..:.,..:..,
or tnem realys authoriAeot W she SoiAistituuoh,
both of them ursurpations upon the rights Of the
States and the liberties Of the citizen and Both
tssr, bo fron, fe corntYu Nv m r;sss
= = :, -
ana nrm pehaYlor q Tue rresiaent IN lnterposlng2
his constituhonal veto. = ~ y ~ II w
It is unnecessary for US to anayse the bill in de-
III, 4rrL 80 I, - H. pnoa;a..,.
ls,.s. y, -, Z non
We lnDilsn To-Day, alssecls the Dill thoroughly,
and gives reasons for his disapproval which are
comnlefe ana unaliswef The neep,e III tbe
- Z.
whole country VINO wish TO- see the forms Of re-
puDlica ian government reserved' nave fresh cause
~ oe grateIul tos ANDREW Johnson for arresting
lhis ingenious measure ana throwing himself INTO
and their soc;al And nolit,cal srsten, from i
racl- a IN n 4. n n
~ 1870 : - u, .-.s7,
Coroner Yeiser and the aIurder Of Mr.
s-s IN Grnber. ,t5 E
ttss. - I Y,
IN .ne l5th lhsI., tne lonoNlns statement vas
pupished IN 1he CKEsegENT; assass .fsa
.Iery Ksn g Pgocs,eaang..Whe the
|at lam Gnbar ers IN 4be IF e
ance ii their duties YESTERDAY, amesseneer called
upon Coroner Y (, who Immediately proceeded
70 lle Sity daii. heturning allef an absence OF
acc,sa If heinz Il yhs ha,,';
eide Tie discharged i've from custoay, retaining
Murphy only Among the liberated was Hennessy,
" las ~ a. otl =, WIG
.tack "a number of Witnesses. supnasadf ia IL n
possession of important facts touching the deed,
had been summoned, but were returned by the
eiaeefs ~ ngs 5oaha .ae
the impronriety Of lis d:scharaine the nartes mn
til the jury Should have completed the inquest and
pFon ouRGed It's Lerdict, and referred rtiaularly
70 sas uase ~ IN wen vas eae
that lie Course Il The coroner was without pree e,
dent or justification. Mr.. Yeiser answ ered that he
had 4 high authority for what ne did; and would
hot nay uoe y Il y nay ~ sucii