, 1866-01-23

ss-Pe!t3e Va retae-ayotee-'
0+Rees -. Holt Of a.
p&-Smiih ct al. Ss. Fargo ct al.
H-Brisuoli -. Grau eta.
G3-Ws0enbe1ger ". Kuhuen ct al
EFox ct Al. -. chi. & q. E r. R. Co.
N-ReGton %: Few et ii.
S-lA1er ys. Young.
'9IColby ct A. II. butcher.
Ntp SuHs.-Von GIahn vs. Won Claim Th1avas
Claim aezlnst aer husband, Hildshranit August
. decree Of martial separation eventually.
The bill Of complaint sets forth that The parties
were married in Chicago, on the eth Of August,
he dessadcnt a. his vie until The lth Or tho pres
eut month One child--4 son-born on the 21st Of
July Of last year, Is the !ole ssde Of The marriage.
braiion Of their marriage, the defendant disregard
tEc his mars1l obligations, comu.cncedh coaEss
OF unkint haIsh and tJrannicai conduct toward het
she nnally separated rom hin; that n January,
1sGl, the defends1t taoash vel moving shs vas
the presence Of their setvants and Of her father IN
consequence OF Nh eh she became vcEy III, and had
an,iscasE3age; TINT he pursued TIL: nhnn1an treat-
ment With the design oi bringing about this result,
tLst when shc was sick be refused TO obtain medi-
cal assistance, compelling her parents to DO SO n
esasen fs to to s'' he her acsd @ and fht IL pasn ps
ence OF her father and other members Of her
family that he wanted to Get I'D Of her, md would
GIve SO GEO to do so; that he celebrated the List
especially cruel and 1nhnnan manner, applying to
her mort opprobrfous epltheta, and renewing his
asslte to be relieved Of her, That iu she mouth Of
Minuesota, and took her with him, and Mhile there,
that he refused to provide fire for her tn Aer roo
20 hat her health "a. impaired and Injured. she
1u9s. ,sss charges aa ZEN %a1rs !n' us oil 1ss
deendsaf though nan q Ersat
I'D a ma % esscposR R ths me II thsir stsy ii ia III
nesota, caused her to be burden upon her tather,
at whose house be also obruded himself refusing E
January. 1s6l he icaaed the house theY occupied
to her brother, but caused her 70 continue thers de-
pendent npon " rslanTs H, sunseaoa1sy sy as s- e.
fourteen days residence, be- without her knowlege
or consent, TOOK her 6unk1 andappaSnl 10 u1tAeEz
scP BIZ hs s,o o Gk q s o G IN
house; md that though he well knew shs wasthen
feyen months with ehila, be refused % contribute
to ss supod ds5 a Ss shs s
that she vas near her confinement, and urged him
to op1ovde suitable house for hex, IL loId her
that she must 20 10 hls stable until his house was
ready and cruelty ttealed het thai she barely e.
capeA another miscarriage. In the presence oe heE
brother and friend, be- expressed de.l1e % sea
her At the gal1ows. That On the 16th day Of JulJ,
be provided her with room, honeb on tho
%ssaea ss1s IL T. rd5S "a e e. to- ss.S E.;
to have her sick IN hl1 house. and 1hreaiene u ste
refused to cal IN police officer and turn her out
dds9. 'ne s.s enaIInned his
brutal treatment toward heE, that he refused 10 sup
Div her with nurse, Or any OF he necessary art1.
to tako her child tom her and leasc her pennilese,
md that mora recently he struck, choked and other
wise maliseated her, until she was cnnpeie1 70
6anilx brutality It the heuse Of her parents.
Il IL alleged that The defendant i owner q lots
I, s and ID block ", Walco1ts addition 70 Chic
70, valued At ts5o ooo also that be po.sesses r. r.
In Chieaso city bonds; about 32oG IN upNed
S.tes seTenshfty 6epd. IN M AnsfGa5 IT
Psni. Hinueso;a: S5,0O of milwaukee, dsy honds; :;
S:D,ilQ Of MInrcsota boad.; another uoftgasa on
Anneso.a 17 sssste j., esnt Pr ee9ea 81 o9 oe1
notrs clsras and seeu1iues, amounting In value 70
he amount Of $l5o0o and tnat bis annual income
% GomnIainant asks for i decree Of divorcs, and
that suitable p1oylslon m the nature Of aliucny
NAV be 3ec1ted, and that the care and Custody or
her child be given hsr. Aso ~. n Injunction DO
With hIs child Of dispoaing af hls property, and
hsIy thar the defendant may Be- stayed BY the
peop!ea writ Of NJ er.a rtpu1ied. from departing
ein&Ion Of the 4uit.
Raa ct II. r.. Abtahane. This Was IN action Of A.
sumps,t instituted b Max Rsn, Samuel Hsaln,
Henry Rsn md Joseph Ran, composing the Chicago
Hrm Of Han Bros. 20. against Moses Abl.hans,
to recover damages laid ~ $1o0l upon 4 bill ol
goods sold and delivered. The defendant has been
carving on business Rt Niles, Alchlsan md also
at buchanan, Michigan Upon The affidavit OF the
l compIat1art, Max Kan, that the defend.n. has
| made fraudulent tsansfcr md conveyance oi hil
atpcks tn trade intending thereby to hinder, delay
and deftaud hts c1edttors. writ OF cQptas al res
pondenH,n1 Issued asainst him. to lecuEe whateye
| Judgement may b ordered against him.
| CIos.y w. the lily. This mas an action OF tres
| pass on the case instituted by John 8. CrossJ
aaapst the City Of Chicago to recover aAaaes lslt
al "a eco, for injuries received BY HIM In nllint
| through an alleged defective sidewalk IN front Q
No al4 On The south side Of Monroe street, Oh tht
aEth Of December latt. By reason Of this acciden
1t IL alleged, caused 1t il charged By tho ne,cass
OF defendant, In allowing the sidewalk to be T.. T. II
| un.sle and dangerous condition, the con nrr.
WIS rendered elck, sore and dlsabled, md dnff.,
vented for e0ue time from attending to INN Lbs
and tulalltng $50 week enlargement Af
boards OF the " Varieties THEATRE, 7rsua: , on
Otear Fields ys. Andrew J. panA1e e,rzeips only
the Gaze. Damages Laid At $lA<
| fled. -,,,sn. Appeal BY de-
CITY Of Chiesso ". John c9ets cnl. tnposed !. the
feudant from nne Of ~ III ~ ~ Tas1anc1 by Jus
Pobse Court upon .hs Of osa1 fenlsy, or
| tee SturtaSAnt, on toi"|~-
ths ~. ss NJ = ss..us, Appeal b, dsfadsas nom ~