, 1866-11-13
LAW iNTElllGENCE.
A City Railway Cuse-1ud.mcnts-
New Suits, dc.

The time Of the United Statea Court was nrin-
clpal!y taken up ycsterdny By the argument OF
demurrer tn the very ancient case between CJrua
Mccormick and ". Grey. This Is ttll to re.
feCorua,ck's present means, alleged TO be prop.
erty belonging 10 GREY as = pattnesship~asses
Tie hearing u not concluded:
d II, K. Stone against the Chicago T. Rock lsla7d
osa nssd u sss1ss ssss nsEss PsT D.
j., NtwLer1y. The default Of Cyrus kceles and
Robert Vincent vas entered In au aesion Of tzcs-
%s Shs.s fSasst sSp" oer Dp
p1 1n areuncnt Was had In The Injunction case of
sisso ,oms !,ns h s!nss ssie!ssa ifoa i;Ssss T
ps.a.d s% sa ss g.. ve9 % e.
| Of Public Works, under which they tore up ihe
street, preparatory - laying the tFse1 A. TIL
tese Mss terved 81 eds Testesay hs company cae into
eonIt 10 procure modification ot the Injunction
:. m. aud before ak O'Clock =. N. Counsel for
tho conpla'nanss held ths proceeding to
tfesular eilns he eoasens e q
twolb!rds Of tho property ewnert On the street se
@ sti! s1 s:s e e. es IT, sssn ss ssTsa Sss'd
Of Public Works. compsinants agree that II WAS
The individual aes Of two members Of the bossd.
nay. nal II dc & counsel deaied she power q The Bo.s
70 giant The pesruisalon. Tbs easo Is with The
Judgment vas rsnaersd .gaInss censsa viii
Ihe s sn: In ths R.ns Seu, sss
uec Of Marshall Field, Ct al, u. Albert i Buck
iugham sturses, assumpsIt; damages laid =
t;eoIge s. rtke, who YVES before a jury Of hanEe
holders in The County cour., to DO released frou
confinement In .hn county IN under = ses,es Q
so1.s On tic allegation Of fraud n his transaction
| win 1hcm, wHs rtmandeu. He yesterday ~
peaed h,s sase to ihs ct.sui. Court ,,,,r.,,,t
nled pc iuon to ensble them 10 pcfpstnasc tes''
i, In Judge Gar,'s room, Of the supe1ior cour
- Judgment wae rendered on q SCI ri; 10 torce'os
;: ssa;nes sf inosss j. Elli, sa:e i jasteomplete
cen F1auk,il D. Clarle and Nathaniel Mitchell
Is It Was s9 action Of t'ovrr. to recover ~ =
alleged Il It aus9' II e
'r tn thc prohibited as well aa private hsanete
= cstabIt*hed branch Office At 1ndiaunpofis, def
In ant taxing charge Of the tame. Subsequently
r contruycfsy arose. hence The enlt. ....
Dr Judge 1anaeson WIS still ENGAGED IN the case
!. MaE1in against Law. for E1ee Imprisonment, as
% pOrtcd heretofore IN tho TRIBUNE. The case v
Ise s.sssce sui: sswss1 * Ma
fs,iTe: ae1 husband rits dese1rns her 1htic
1scts OF The psrt Of the complainant, Was 1e1cfs
~ | to the Mast to report.
~ Ihe new suits were Caroline E. Cunnnsh.
u against Euoch ]. Cunningham for diro &c, On
m ground OF desertiou: James G. shepley conses.
od Judgment LOT 44,oao in favor Ct IA holmes. 7!
to odorc p Hlughey sued +. ". Taylor Ia hsenu
to at. 10 rrcovef upon = ptomiss soty nole. d.
1t, Inn.sville, ksatask!, 9Hne sth f.si for $1m'
" .tneo fNovemtcr 6ah} before The County Court
" r. allegation Of aer ineaait rln wlGa ths
Fhs curt This time the 5nry eonnd the c1lsteoet
10 ihe dl.ct.cd mind, that the insanity hss becs
If <Ix weeks duration, and ,hat the unfortu1
- woman IL t~cnty- y-three Year, Of axe
~" "n The will OF the lato Christopher Set!l w11
,ef. sented for prohste, when It appeared that
lies eubkcrbinE Wl;Ecs. te sick and not likely "a
nto cover bis hesIth. Under this state Of fae1
uch clerk was ordered to proceed 10 Tho rrt1denc
led the witness there t9 take ms oepo.,iEnon: :,
snE Inc ELI. ~ = =. h.irr nesdV In.
rEe IA ~ trne Ellis hsyr been re,u,
1nd | ~ ~ rrrnS fnrv