Western Reserve chronicle. [volume] (Warren, Ohio) 1855-1921, 1866-02-28

| l0l bOSJWlcn nanny VS. Wllllam InOm-
as; settled and costs paid.
I32 Tensand D Pelton VS. Linus D
Sheldon, continued with leave to answer
and leave to Geo < Pelton to become par
ty defendant with leave to answer.
136 Geo w Crawford VS. H Ward; de
cree, see journal.
I37 Clarissa Roberts VS. Jerome Roberts
ct al; F E Hutchins appointed guardian
ad libitum for Eliza A Roberts, minor, and
order of petition granted.
l4I S Ticehurst & Brother VS. Abel I
Eaton; continued.
No. 142. Ohio VS. Abraham Bowers, fol
skedaddling. In this case the Grand
Jury found no bill.
IA & 143 Ohio VS. Milo II White and
Willard Day; the defts were bound over
on oath of Abraham for alledged perjury
in having the said Abraham arrested for
skedaddling; Grand Jury found no bill.
147 Rebecca Ensign by friend VS.
Dwight R Chapman; this cause settled.
149 Admir- of Sam'l Ensign vs. Eunice
c Kinghton ct al; this cause settled
each party paying one-half the costs.
154 Garry c Reed vs. John R Woods ct
al. Settled and costs paid.
158 Anna S Smith vs. Eliza Smith ct
al. For partition, but dismissed by par
titioner at her costs.
l59 Henry Alderman VS. Joseph Mi
ner. Dismissed by PPtf
162 Mark Goldner VS. Wilson ct al
Continued for service.
les Philip Clements VS. Ball & Math-
ews. Settled and costs paid.
l67 Lyle & Polhemus VS. John R Wood.
Judg't by default, 1894 48. 9r
168 Abraham Strock & Co, VS. John
Jones ct al. Sttled and cost paid.
ITO Auren Stowe vs. Asahael Goodrich.
Judg't for s.
17S Packard VS. Hyde ct al PPtf has
leave te make Margaret Prentess party
defendant, and continued.
185 j Simmons vs. Admir- of Thomas
Giddings. Continued.
187 John Price VS. TrumbulI Oil Co.
Appealed; case continued.
l89 Ohio VS. Charles CleYeland ct al
A bill was found by Grand Jury against
defts for larceny in Brookfeld; contin-
ued and each of the defendants in de-
fault Of giving bail in $500 each, are COM
mitted to Jail, and discontinued.
192 Thomas Lauter VS. Jacob Smith,
RepleVin Suit for span of horses pur-
chased by defendant of the plaintiffs
peddler; right of property decided to be
in plaintiff, and Jacob in trying to get q
a cheap team is muius some 5000.
1913 Olive E Boseley vs. Dyson Bosely.
Divorce case continued.
1917 Rachel Davis VS. Sage Lloyd ct al.
App'd; case continued.
19S Leonard ScoVille VS. Jno R Woods
ct al continued.
200 Isaac Kirk I'd VS. John Gillespie.
App'd from justice docket, by defend
ant case continued.
203 Warren Packard VS. New York &
Mecca Oil Co. Attachment case con-
tinued.
205 Ohio vs. George Hewey. For Pet
1t Larceny; defendant enters into bonds
of 5000 for his appearance from day to
day.
206 VIM H Hays VS. Ex'rs of David
Morris. Mandate from Supreme Court
ordered to execution docket.
233 Ohio vs. Bonj Gilbert. For deal
ing out blue ruin contrary to law; the
defendant is srraigned before the court,
pleads guilty like man, is fined $50 and
costs; which Benjamin pays and is again
permitted to roam at large.
258 Ohio vs. Linus Lampman. Same
offence. Defendant also pleads guilty !;
pays fine and costs.
259 Ohio VS. Ezekiel Gilman. Same
offence defendant also pleads guilty,
and comes to time in paying his $50 and
costs, and leaves for the oil diggens with
out grumbling.
&c Ann Thomas vs. Richard Thomas.
Divorce; which on proper hearing, is
granted
I63 Jackson VS. Jackson ct al. This
case referred to L. C. Jones, master COM
missioner.
Sc Joseph Bailey VS. John Rathburn.
This caseis bro gttorecover bounty money;
after proceeding to trial to Jury examin-
ing witnesses, and after one plea having
been made, the defendant was permitted
20 amend his answer, Whereupon the case
was continued.
l26 Abraham Bowers VS. Milo White
and Willard Day. Exceptions to depo-
sitions sustained by court, and case contin-
ued on motion of plaintiff.
247 Ohio VS. James Hunt. For selling
liquor contrary to law defendant pleads
guilty, but having quit the business some
time ago, and since then continued in
virtuous, temperate course, he was let off
by paying costs. .-rs--
$50 Ohio VS. Royal Rogers. Same Of
fence. The defendant having sold his
property in johnson, preparatory to re-
firing to his farm in Wayne, he was let
off by paying fine and costs, therefore
departs with Royal dignity.
900 0hiO Va q r Tau Sapna offopoa
In view of the youthful appearance of
the defendant, and he having quit the
liquor fire some tlme ago, he is permitted,
on paying small amount into the treas
ury, to ego hence without delay"
237 Ohio VS. Enoch Martin. Same Of
fence. He also was let off on the same
mild terms.
23S Ohio VS. VIM II Tew. Same Of
fence let off IN same manner as No. 229.
42 Henry Wagner VS. Andrew An
1rews ct al. This case tried to court; de-
cree for defendant, plaintiff excerpts.
54 Susan Leiby VS. John Leiby. For
Almony. Tried to court, and decree for
defendant plaintiff gives notice of ap-
peal.
6S NIL Powers VS. Adgate & Peck
Tried to Jury, verdict for plaintiff of 5000.
Ga Ohio VS. Phillips. For affray in
nollied by prosecutor.
239 State of Ohio VS. Jas Elliott. Sell
ing liquor contrary to law; defendant
pleads guilty, and is let off on payment
If costs. -
240 Ohio VS. Warren Loveless. Same
pleads not guilty, gives bail and
5 going to try the constitutionality of the
aW.
pa Ohio VS. Thomas Hodges. For sell
ing liquor in one single instance to mi
Ior pleads guilty, and upon payment of
osts is discharged as he keeps one of the
est watering places in the County. l.
245 Ohio VS. Morgan Morgans. De
endant appears, pleads guilty, pays fine
nd costs, and is again turned loose upon
e.eold charities of the world. 4,
248 Ohio vs. John Wheatley. Same
fence The defendant keeps the only
of the kind upon Quinby {
I'LL, and being a good Union man, John !
lade his deposit in the County Treasury
nd goes on his way rejoicing.
260 Ohio vs. George Young
, Daniel Bishop, Esq. The deferdent, !
'Ollng'.as he is, pleads not guilty, throws {
imse1f IN mia rountr the prosecutor s