, 1866-11-06

Editors Chicago Tribune.
go % aEst ss s II ne e. sa:s
which demands ieply., Taking. up the arst para,
graph, what does It signify that Mrs. geebe should
So e
@ Iasins exposed Elm, does hat make hito any less
ks scse tue facs s6at be id md is said I'll contsiasi
in that statement. That she made that speech
contained u the article in question with tears
falsehood and she Is resdy to stctdr that che did
not, notwithstanding the presence OF II credible
wiInesf,"' who BY tho way only canae into tbc
office Of Mr.. Wh!pple 5ust as Mrs. L. was goin4s-:
It is due to Mr. james curres (wbo is the psrtl-
snsr onec, Of NJ MapRs,s hnz tha'
the man that TOOK MEe. Beebe's .Fsatement" In Wri-
ting a. he, oGn Earnest FtQueT, IS the sane iAess
had been floating over the community for long
church, 50 that It could be presented to the PIE
siding Elder for investigation, This act taking
@ N m It se a f hsdn. "sae mt y ss
language fatI4 10 describe its baseness; when 10
tnct It was done With much reluctance, and finally
on', fSE he pnrpo:s Of bftnstDS lac matter before
= Il motive IS ssssnr could s. sstd
Tor ior dny xss sSst sss mn
the gospel. 70 very unbecomfns, should b. ea.
posed ard investigated The 1uatter never having
t,nae @ to make trouble IN tle community. as il dia
before 1t wna committed 10 writing, so long ae It
is left so. II Is farther stated Ia said article tha,
Beebe*e sts1Asenent' fur publication, charge
that il false and founded merely on suppos!tion,
as Ar. Whipple knowing that the said James Cur
rey was opposed to bis ubiquitous transactions,
concl1ucd, ofcour:e, that he waa one Of those who
furnished Il tor publication.
Concerning those "inassuz9s3es" Il may be
;a ae 20, 'ey sS 1S ss
| enracies" Of the ''ssateneut" Of Mr; Beese. She
sary to say In which way It Was inaccurate. bul
| Mr.. Whipp1e has undertaken 10 nakc capital o1
Tor tna, tsote nss
as It was Ia1 worse IN the reality, thus ehow.ns
thai M1s. Beebe withheld mnch. ~ prudence DIG
tuted, which. II revealed. would show him befnrt
tlat The :inaecuracies did nut '.oE'einate II IL,
raird Of Jas Currey" ma1!cioasly stated In salt
article. 1t Was thought that Mr. Whipple wou!t
base good senst enough not to haye ssit
ces = and Il mas be further stated that for asa
cics" way concluded npon after the statement ha'
been made and signed. and s&ser i had passed tu
to the possession Of Mr.. B7st, the comp1aiaau
npon The .Eta1 Of Nr. "h'prle, bus were never IN
IN reference to the t.charity' spoken OF it ma
be said that the family of Ar, c. NC now an
always have been sIlf-sps'dtaang-and the SAN
may be said Of Mr.. Ba*t.
The allegation that one Of these mcn had bee
out Of "honc:t employment for oyeE two years.
! Is baEe fa1achood, y hfch the writer knew whe
| be renned il. 1t Is believed that eithe! Of thos
+ men havo done more honest legitimate labor az
| business within The list six months. ttan II
writer Of that article has performed IN fseo 5ean
Finally, n behalf Of The dissenting portion (
the congregation, or "scceders" at they has
I teen termed. W may ~ that Il faif he7;in
! eccle>iss,ical vengeance. as has been wh!-pete
sroupd by Mr: Mppls tush A. A. hs1ng n,,s,sn snt
would feel deeply gr1eyed ut such step, ent =
would etll relsin on Iespses se1 ouf T. miasts.
| ter. We thank God for q free salvation which q
perds On no exscrnals. bnt loost to The hsa7t: ~
| our a1licriopt, whatever may be our fortune
regards Church conviction We haze many brig
depcndcnt Of church connection. Of whom Il
| to.dest, luthe1, broke away ffom 1he trammel.
nication; and a long list Of Ptoses.ans*. non:co
forrutsts and dipseuters. lfchte-of the Eo+pel a
4 objects OF ecclesiastical hatred
A MEMDKn or N1s1ET CHArEL