New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-03-19
Glse courts.
Cases SET for Trial This Day.

/ UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
Tn. A. Rildreth VS.. Hopkins Il Co.-Bright
| W. W. Buell. vs.. J. II. oglesby and John Macau
iay-Brght. Sullivan, Billings Il Hughes.
| United States vs.. VIM. Nelson. Rule on Sheril
of New Orleans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CoUKT.
P. D. 0'Neal VS.. Red River Packet Company
Earhart u Ferguson. W. H Robinson
Heardis u Spadng Vs. Schooner Fl, r. Mills
Larrisson Fellows.
| J. L. Lavengee VS.. Steamer Mexico-Fellows &
! Castera. Torrey.
| SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
| Cyrot Gentes vs. Manuel Blasco and E. D.
Blasco-Steel. Lcgardeur.
| Thorny Lafon VS.. Mrs. d. FL. Jones, eSecutrix
Mrs. D. III. Jones, plaintiff, E. Conery ct al, e.
Conery, appellant Bermudes Legardeur, W.
H. Hunt, Bgan.
| Il. W. Cooler VS.. Succession of c. F. Abels-
! Budd & Lambert. Cutler Il Hawkins.
w. Gordon 81 Co. vs.. N. f. Rice-Singleton
| Day.
! Pierre Hoa VS.. Emile Lafraac- Sambola l. Du.
| eros. G. Schmidt.
! SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
| Crane VS.. Shepherd Browne-Durant & Hornor.
| McCay.
| Shift VS.. shif-Morgan. Spo1ord, Clarke &
Davidson, executor of Wilkins-Lacey. Lem.
ley.
Parham VS.. Parham- Riggs, Belden & Fuselier
Egan.
John M. Bach vs.. Canal Bank-Buchanan & Gil.
more. Hunt & Denegre.
In the matter of Juvenal, an absentee sambola
Il Ducros. Grima
Sosshene Roman VS.. J. Denny ct als-Whitaker
Fellows Il Mills. Roseus and Phillips.
THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
D. Ahern VS.. Henry ct al.-Mix & Robinson.
Coleman.
Biering vs.. his wife-Voorhies & McCay Cooley,
9, M 10 Vincent vs.. J. Observation-Disclosures.
Sheriff and W. Grant.
W. Wander vs. N o. Turner'S Society Dali
sheimer g. Buck. Wenck.
J. III. Wells VS.. z. Getchell--Wallace. D. N.
Hennen.
Wallaek & Co. vs. S. Lohmuller- Dalsheimer &
Buck. Wenck.
A.C. Meyers, executor, vs.. John Mitchell-Con.
rad u Sons. Breaux & Howard
A. O. Meyers executor, vs.. w. J. Castell-Same
| attorneys.
J. N. Allen vs.. Winston, Morrison i CO.,. B..
Cotton. W, H. Paxton.
| s. b. Newman, executor, VS.. Rotchfora Brown
y Co.-Lacey. McCay.
City of New Orleans, for use, ETC., vs. Alex.
McKee-HeWes. Mayes.
City of New Orleans, for use, etc., vs. B. f.
Lotspeich--Same attorneys.
City of New Orleans, for use, ETC., vs. Eliza Le-
cesne-Same attorneys.
City OF New Orleans, for use, etc., vs.. W. FL.
Holmes-Same attorneys.
City OF New Orleans for use, etc., VS.. Mrs r.
B. Rigg-Same attorneys.
J. n. Beebe d Co. VS.. Kaiser &c Bryau-Huntine.
ton. Lacey.
J: Wolf vs. Bullitt d Whaley-Lacey. senmes
& Mott.
J.Wolff VS.. G. Bullitt Same attorneys.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
r. E. Allen VS.. C. T. Hayes ct als.-EImore &
Madison Railway Company VS.. steamer Pauline
). s. e Il. +. Neal VS.. steamer Pauline H. H.
Armstrong vs.. steamer Pauliae-Harrison L. Hun
ton. Egan, Emerson &c Grow.
L. q. Miller d. Co. VS.. steamer Trabue-Farles
ton h Hart Rozier. Singleton. Bradford, Lea
u Finney. -
Elijah Peale VS. D. Michel-McDannold. Tissot.
Giovanni Aponio VS. Widow Charles Galgain-
Derbes. D. N. Hennen.
/. W D. McConb VS.. o. E. Hall-Collens. Clarke
& Bayne.
Ihornhill & Co. VS.. R. R. Rawkins ct als.-T, H
Kennedy. Morgan.
B. J. Sanford and wife vs. Wright & Allen
Semmes & Mott. Clarke & Bayne.
w. w. Carrie IL Co. VS.. steamer Live Oak ct aIs-
W. B. Koontz Pro. per.
Samuel Janaison VS. j. Maillot & Co.-semmes &
Mott. Budd.
Macon g. Steptoe vs. Eastman. Bryant g. Co.
Semmes & Mott, Fellows q Minis, Coilens. HINT
Buchanan g. Gilmore, Rozier.
, De forrest, Armstrong d Co. vs. L. Lion
Samuel .. Moore q Co. VS.. Marcus ]. zants
Bradford, Lea o. Finney. Mari & Fonte.
John Chaife vs.. Chas. &. Marshall-Spoffprd e. |
Campbell. r. Il H. Mari.
s. o. Nelson q Co. vs.. Fred. G. Smith--Hays g. !
Adams. Charles E. Mount.
Lewis Phelps vs.. r. C, Cummings Il Co
Xoontz. Hays & Adams.
Francis G. Roberts vs.. r. G. Cummings & co..
5reaux d Fenner. Hays 4 Adams.
Hone llsQranGe COmnanU Mru T. w T,r |
John Mckee.
DR.. Warren Bickell VS.. Rotchford, Brown &c Co.
. NJ Brickell. McCay.
Michael Boyce VS.. Warren & Crawford-Hvans
Lea & Levitt VS.. S: H. Characterization &.
Tart. Trudeau. $3.50.
R. W. Adams vs.. A. W. Observation-Disclosures &
Tart. Hays & Adams.
FL. W. Taylor VS.. Davidson 8 Black-van DOL
on. Defts.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT. ...
RULE.
Crocker, Hazel & Merton VS.. Comeggs, Damrig
tals.-Breaux, Fenner. Leovy, Cutler & Hawkins.
James Ready vs.. VIM. and Jas. Jay-Whitaker |
elbows Il Mills. Race Il Foster.
Jules Manouvrier vs.. JAS. Il. Merrilier-J. M.
irhammer. Redmond, curator ad hoe.
John Lazarus VS.. S. Jacobs-Bonner. VI. g.
B. Cotton.
Emile Tureaud VS.. H. Octave Colcomb-Bond.
\. N. & H. N. Ogden.
Menken Bros. Co. VS.. A. Lewis-Harrison &
1unton. Fox
Augusta W. Buddendorf vs. Henry W. Baxter
Atocha d Howe. Whitaker, Fellows & Mills.
Payne, Huntington & Co. vs. VIM, d, Smith,
harrison d Hunton. Smith, Fox.
John Bfeen vs. j. B. Laurence-Bright Layis-
on. 5sl - |
O. +. Buddecke VS.. John Il Elliott & Co. ct all
ernudez. Mari d Foute.
Sixth DISTRICT COURT
Leonard Fash VS.. Theopholis Prudhomme-Du-
Int Il Hornor.
J. n. Cata!onqua vs.. r. P. Hsrwg OF al.-Grand-
lont d Iissnt. Hunt Il Denegre.
john A. Williams VS.. Simon Seis-D N. Hennen
yams Il Jonas H.
O \, A .Fasssy vs. 7. Anfoux- sambola 4 Dueros
Z. Il. Murphy.
U. Simon VS.. A. Adler Dalsheimer. Bradford,
ca q Finney.
Jas. FL. Adams vs. Daniel Fairex-H. p. De-
lienx. Huntington.
Joseph Jouet VS.. Manuel Perodat-sambola q
ncros. Cambray.
A. v, Saucier VS.. Mr.. and Mrs James Ure.
INTERESTING TO EMIGRANrs.--We would direct
tention to the advertisement of Messrs. VIM
unter & Co., in another column. Their charge
T steerage passengers, on the line of steamers be-
Teen this port and Liverpool, should be consd-
ed by every one desiring to encourage emigra-
IN from the British Islands. The tide of emigra-
IN has hitherto been to Northern ports and to
OSe wshinp tn live in the Eorthaaat fbosa