New-York tribune., 1866-12-01
CLYIL COURTS.
UNITED STATES COMMISSIONERS OFFICE7Noy. 90
Before Commissioner NEWTON
AN ALLEGED FUGITIVE FORGRR - AN EXTRADrrioE
CASE.


CASE.
no The Ertloliti3u Of James Hcn4y Grcatrcx
The accused was photographer In Glasgow, SCOT
on hs ins Of scotland h having uttered portioa Of
counlfy on iho h Of sspaabc last coming by tto steamer
lbonc, information OF M nfer properly substantatod nav
sng cyc the President by Sir Frederick Bflc t
soasr s V,' az 6n 5a, .g power TO issue
warrant ior the apprehension ol Gfe,IeA "f rfcF No
Con- Superintendent Of Police glasgow tToesol tns s,fC %
20 Chs cy and, on tho Prslsi, rs ofug anu t , ~, fire
the CanisiSncr Yesterday u5uing. He h tol WelpFo-
pDliionci nan complexion dis Gei Ses ana ' % a " S
csrswra iIc was wei ufcstd ond biz general appear
encc That Of geaionan odiqg R go9S pCiGa M %
th sel bv Ssms Iho accused arose bowcdao lc Court
% ndnle h. preseaoe sgt I a M sat ~ f. anJ o;
iu2mi re CVut thai ' proceedings were taken by Vir-
tue q s9 under ne ddSs, ier t hc N onisod
ti m warrant the sic accused had been issued BY
nb,l s,tteef, aT f,c r--ased arose and sai he was
notsrr Tie Commissioner hcn informed counsel that he
tses bod hor oihs lacF in the 5sy or his morning
II fsay aged TO Adjourn o further hearing unii thus
Mf Is \ Msr6sry for Tue British Governments Mt G. NJ
Ouri' 10 ''0 'Issss r,f,5o c,mr.is.,s,or osnonvr
A coETLCr on wARRAETs-A C,dAR MANUFACTURE IN
TROUBLE.
United States lst Joel GnvouE
tn, defendant who charged with making cigars at
Barod Conn without making return 20 the Collector re-
u
GommiFs oncl.asi wednesday ne said 90 have oscondcd
from conncctcu 90 escape tac consequences oi ms oco
and take. up h residence u hs city The Assistant United
Baes hiei Attorney f0r lbc District Of Connecticut Nh
ii Cornwall started IN hl pursuit of The alleged fugitive and
ju dong go alSpayei zeal ta discretion he did not
brings t BIN any legal poo, Of TIE defendant having COM
mitci ts not with which Dr. 81 charged and apparently con
sdac tiat verbal statement ly n that the defendant onst
t0be su back and tho malnr q AFFIDAVIT by person
who noclepln "a hmfh0t d.ldlut told him thn BE WIS
gong m1kc cE1rs without r1kiag tetufn--Wns a tat
wasecrsslry. The Asssi'r lsgc'Attoincy stated that
nc beryci TIE defendant hal mlluctued - cl oiees W
out making return the Collector Counsel Tor dcien0at
oyad bis discharge The EoYu that The chnrgc was IN
sufficient bold him ba TIE Commissioner decided under toe
clcums'nc,s hold drcalat for examination but cis
charged him appear f0r sTci examination, on SV'J bat
the Assist int District Attorney % furnish, IN the Mcan
the proofs
5unss f the aoonssl appeared before the Commissioner
yestoly ard informed tle Commissioner that tins saions
Assistant psc Attorney bod us8nfl warrant OF removed
Of the examination 90 Connecticut RON udge Snae Who WAS
no. aware at COmiss8ac Osborne had issued his warrant
end proceeded an Che case bet tai Judge Smaey rp0n being
the Unei States Marhal The warrant until the
pr0cecngs before Commis3 Osborne had been concluded
Counsel then asked that the further examination be post
p0ned until Tuesday next
COmussoncr Osborne granted TIE motion 10 adjourn but
said that defendants bail binding aod he shcum expect
either Che production o. The accused on Tuesday or slae
tory o bis and that the matier Of the
conflicting warrants case % DO settled between defend
ants counsel aad The United states Marshal subsequently
iho defendants bOnsman appeared before the Commissioner
and desired be released o8 his bond and 10 surrender TIC
defendant TO the custody Of ac Government he had feared
tao warrant Of Judge Smay night be served by ashl Mur
rayand the dcndsnsthcgcb prevented from appearing or
Tuesday IL which be he SURETY would be inbc
The bail bond then cance and The decndan remandcd
OlaA.