New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-02-21
OLE Courts.
Gases Bet afor rrial II: Tr'his Day.


UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT. sdr
Marsh Bros. & Co. VS.. McCutcheon 4 Howell
Buchanan h Gilmore. Howell in pro. per. ~ W
lI{Joiln ID. s0' Leary va. MoCutchedn " Howell, in
liquidation, and S. Howell-S. Howell in pro. per.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.
United States vs.. the Greenwood plantation,
property of BFaxton Bragg United States Attor-
Eney. Roselius, Deblieux, D. Augustin.
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. ~
Victor Romage VS.. succession of E. v. Morot-D.
Martin Gordon, Jr., Redmond Roselius Phillips,
Joseph Bruin VS.. Davis g. Jackson ct ALA. 4
A. Pilot. Hiestand g. F. v. and j. B. Cotton. 81
n Sncccssion Of j. III. sLaborde vs. ID. W. Hunting-
ton, administrator Bright Huntington.
Schroeder & Schreiber VS.. Eugene Darolles-G.
Schmidt. Durant & Horror. IRE
Bennett & Lurgess vs. W. G. Robinson-G.
Schmidt. Roselius. aEstt
Thomas Murphy vs.. saml H. Fasnach- Durant
Hornor. G. Schmidt.
E. W. Huntington, curator of succession of La
horde vs.. Mrs. Ellen Logan, widow of ]. M. La
borde-G. Schmidt Bright aE
John N. Monagan ,ys. John Morgan Hali-Eggles
ton. P. H. Morgan. $3.50 5Fs8 3#i
/ ailiSise 5sga CRIMINAL CoURT. @
The State VS.. Daniel Phillips and John Brown
colored, ct als.AAffray. ,,5tp
The State vs.. John Sharpless- receiving stoler
| property knowing II to have been stolen. l5 3t5
SECOND DISTRICT COURT. .H-,.
| Succession Of Arthur Macarthur Landreaux.
Bright, Burgess. ssal = r Ntgs q
r. Borge vs.. One piece Of property Il. 9. Mil
Ter. Redmond, q. Hunt. 4s III.
4 Sarah Webb, tutrix, VS.. Harlow Lamb--H. G.
4 Miller, 7. s., McCay. Michel, Gilmore. stff
Daniel P. Sparks VS.. Succession of G. BoulignJ
and Louis Harang--J. D. Augustin, johnson Il Da
4 Wis. A. & A. Pilot. tqe6.a 35.i
Edw. Jacob, Admir-, vs.. H. L. Malon, Testament
Il tarv a Dahtiauy II phillips NO &
Mott. .st9 .'tl3 8
l8f THIRD DISTRICT COURT. 4-
| Y4i9Ees 49 sis t RuLKs. y " Sif4i5s a A. 4
Biering VS.. his wife-T. =. d W. H. Cooley
| shower vs.. Bate-sheldon & Pardee. Ail3
| Houston VS.. Mason & Gilder--J. b. Cotton. She
don s Pardee. '17 ,3,'. .r
sidoni Pierret vs., Wells Bros. Co.-rDerbe
| ana a. d Nj VOORHEES,. Lynch, ". ,g ..,ji
y. ". Fee vs.: y CONCEAL Singleton, Sullivan
j. fattte vs. B. A. iBroue-J. I. Tissot. I
r. j. Kef,, execute Va sl' u T. Rub Egglestol
Whitaker. Fellows 4 Mills. ,,a. ~.
ton. Miller. Clarke & Bayne. - h.
J. Glass w. j. G. Schneider Mann. Howard.
n M 33i FOURTH DIsrRIcT COURT. 9 b
4 W ntalgt 3as Is RuLE. s. oiffias tlsfs ~
Mary @. Shaw. wife 0fsC. W. Wilson, vs.. Art
mon Hill 6 Sheriff Hired Hennen y Paris Chils
ress. H. A. Morse b Lacey. 9eS}f53i3 i3i
"A i.i5b sHeIE xxcsprios g9s4 gi3atf 4Rle
!, R; B9y&vs Frank Hewer- Haynes. Bnchana
\ Gilmore. 6sn3eS sfsiiff t,27s
ell ~ CASES ,ssE = -s5z
4 J. +. Bowman VS.. j CONCEAL Harrison
hnnton. sullivan, Billings & Hughes.
e Hewes 4 Eusts ~ 7fsst- .I7I7
J. Abby l. Catching vs.. James Murray & son-E
III joshua Fennimore vs.. city Of New Orleans
Of Clarke Il Bayne. Hewea. i3'h AZ f'1E
"a r Z. Miller ". Bower, Garner Harrison IT.
le and W. II. Cooley. Bright. ar ~ - o =
4, City Of Baltimore yssJ. G.. DayisGMott, HE
2 tand. s' s