, 1866-01-16

Ou1G W. 4NtuuC E& ~.
10. HcEina!ey ct nl. IS. Klllabnew.
~ honte'd W. Kelly smrseadcs, etc.
81. Muic 70. Eosenthal Il Il.
IS, Dun!sp VI. Hooper:
the cARc for slandcr instituted By Mary best
Charles Mears. 10 recover damages laid ut <l0000.
Beyond the praetpe for summons no papers were
Cncr17 CerE7 or Cook Corsrr-Bsfone Hon.
E'Yu.ftu S. Hifiinas. Jstfgt.-tauEmsnn n. Ken.
dali This vne IN ae1on Of Hespass On the case lu-
as &c q a n Seyond s.
1rHeipe for summons NO PAPER. were died;
Allen Ct u. =. Hume St q. An action Of repe.ia
In icn saeeey ~ ssanst saaa Iaaee @ " nas n T o.
Grover and e. .. ness, to recover POSSESSION Of
our hundred and .cscnty,th,sc sardt Of ..txo ply
1esa % s. asancd s saas
Ghaf4es ". piinote " ~: Aorsse >: Ml1cof.Lls ~
a Judgment Of . justce 0! the peace-
Auehn II. Dcslng-Asfumpsit, on tsisL
Diett, etc Bcfrc--1hts was action Of tres-
nc1, friend. Gottf.ied DIe*t, asntns William Won
Berge 10 recover danaces Laid At xl0 900. The de-
ca1ntlou Ct tottfacd bicst asserts thst he is the
year tho defendant with fofce md arms as.aulted
his son, and at1er seriously hEulsiug and beating
him, dauSeronsly wounaed him by shooting him
with \ fonble tmrrelled Enn.
The following IL the tE1al calendar In this Court
for today:
Haiti et A. f8. tfo1IQ et n.
q. Van Btskirk ". Mulvie.
81. haynes ". Adan4 Express TO.
81, Nonrse et al. ". HooEe.
IS. Stanley ". barque Flying Cloud
81, 1letteEmnn II. same.
s.. King ". Geta]er.
20. London ct al. ~. Lumbesman's 1us. Co.
a., Palmer et al. v. Gillett ct n.
4a. Lincoln ". Sherman ct al.
d Gcisjcr ". Webb.
q. lego ss- CITY q Chicago.
8. H..sr as y, = i; :: ! = 4R.Rco.
I'll. Hannca VI. Rutherford.
g g 9;h,skss'ns T1's r. ;ssLi1ntae ~: Mh'sa0a'e-
nkconDras coTaIaBSyt ,I non E, rS1 J., Bsrss
cery tnst1iu,cd By Edward Hooth asa,nEt hts wife,
Ellen A. Booth, to obtain decree OF divorce, upon
hun. Complainant asfcits anas1iase ai chntens IL
the StAtc OF Massachusetts, on Tire 7th Of Msrch.
ISL md that he has e1Wase ac1ed towards her In
lived with her. a.:er n1arrsace, 70: two and half
years in state OF happines:, undistnrbed By
E Se Ron As IN inc q ;o f. WI We e4esss 1!hs
npon The wife to prejudice her asnfust her nrce,
and which he believes did excite feelings Of jeal-
puey and discantent in her mud. At that lime
l,elfeytne 1t would be better to remove his young
vile from ibis maternal influence. he removed 10
Tie town Of Rutland, Vermont, but she refused to
accompany him. Aftct his removal he repeatedly
wrote 10 lie wife, deerine her 10 follow him. she
tres1cd uany ol hls letters with sllcnce, and when
fns did ssy 4, to ss With bun
An Affidavit Of the non-Ees!dencr in Ibis State OF
detendan; was f!ed by complainant
Chnocery in4tituted 10 obtain 4 dIs.o,uttou ol The
bonds OF matzimony. Mafy Wheeler, the complain
ant assxxsed in ht1 pct,tton hat she Vas married to
1eTif Wheeler. the defendant. In 1851. II AuicA.
Indiana. and lived with him a. good md faltltu!
wife until tho spring Of 1861 ~hcn II ie chargsd he
sny.n a1a snisn IT, s su In c.
cey instituted hy John Sullivan the 30th o3 lt8r
October aganst bis wife Catherine Sullivan. 70 OBJ
tain decree Of divorce. Default having been
1aIen, The sut rms referred during The present ic1u
Q! the Court to ulrrm ~ Chase, Esq, Master IN
Chanocry, 10 take psoots and rrrort-
The Masters report received yesterday WAS to the
following eject:
Fita-Ths parties were married In the Parish OF
Skull, county Of Cork, Ireland. over thirty years
s<cond!v-The complainant IL a resident Of Chi
eago. and-h.s been 70 foF thirty saass net past:
Thsrd-1he defendant wifulg and without any
3uft reasonable c1nte deserted and Ahecnted her
eeI from the complainant soma ten Or r=leEcn Year,
nso: -
Of rsid m.rriase' -. Two q whom nc mino1, ased
, eighteen and sixteen Fealt.
Ihe Master recommended dissolution Of the
uupt'aa Claims. and reported that the complainant
was suitable person to have custody Of the child
The report xas aled, and confirmed, aud in pur-
euauce ,heruf decree Of divorce was orderod by
The People ". William wray alias William Il.
and o' % oideisd To tssae SUE
a:atnst Leonard Ro'heMber, surety.
r. : ss@s y n, sns {S1 p,
i.sue aca,ns1 nothsa.ber, surety:
Same ,sme-1ndlc.neut Of burglary: Ban In
the sum If 900 dcclFed forfeited, and sss Jaeaas
x,rdc1et 10 !-rne ae1inst Rothcrrbet, er-ety-
samc " snne-lpdictnen! Of burglary. Bail Ia
9he su1n Of ESQ declared forfeited End sctrt ataa
ordered to 's.us as1.ast noshss5hs1, r surety :,
4he sa,n q: $50 declared 1o feited md sc<s aesal
on.crcd 10 issue AGAINST itotheeEber, surety.
the aurn Of fso declared i 1cited. md se;rf sa,
ordered 10 is-ue ngainsI Rothey1hes. surety:
same ST George o. Roos-lnd'ctment Of larceny.
same =, John 0. Mallo.y-1ndic.ment Of lar
ce1y. Verdict, 'stullty;" under arc.
na,ne vs.: sanae-1ndtctneat Of larceny Verdict,
ia. Induced ior lie larccny Of coat from aaloon
On Wcs! Madison street
people e: DANES Wa'son-;IndIctnent Of larceny:
'.Gully" cn1rrcd. The prisoner, II il said. il m
old Offender On enc occasion, uhlie tou1ncyine to
Jolis, he Enanaeed 70 essape from he cns!ody Of
he is 1ndicted for pscking aman'a pocket Of an
same =. Peler nunes-lud!esment Of assault:
snme ~ Edward Mnlishnli Indictment Of rob
bely. Fctdlct+ mot Gm1y."
tamc rs Fritz Observation-Disclosures Of the lar
ceny Of a email sum Of money. Verdics, MOT
Co6Srr cor1r-B<fo,x Hoa J. D. Brdduax-
In Tue e.ta:e o. Jane Hood the inventory and ap-
In tic e.ta,e Of Ernn Hughes. deees.ed, the ap-
pIaisement uas approved. and 1nseutnEy not ap.
In The estate Of Tho.nss Euehsh, deceased. the
administering ozdesrd to cause IN adjudication
Of clatme e. ths March term os ths Court, md that
Eve Dc1cEor was appointed guardian Of Gfnr0e,
Joseph and Mary Beicnor, under bonde Of 81 SUI.