New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-04-02
Ghe Courts.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT.

h. A. Bradford.
In the matter Of Juyenal, an absentee-Salnpoia
l. Ducros, L. Castera. a. GriIna.
Roman vs.. Denny, ct als.-Roselius O. PhllilpS.
Whitaker, Fellows & Mills.
THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
j. M. Wells VS.. Z. Getchel-J. E. Wallace. d.
N. Hcnnen. ,
]. NJ. Allen vs. Winston, Morrison CO.. u.
Cotton. W, II. Paxton. ~ ,-:..o, ?.
Newman, executor, vs: ColemanIbIiltoh "
Withers. Geo. S. Lacey, Harrison q huhton.
H. Lion vs. Fl. Observation-Disclosures I" DUN
W. r. Crane. - ,,.,, rx.,
bell. Spofford & Campbell
G. Bienyenu vs. Radovich ct al, Geo. ). Lacey,
p. Eran. W. H. Cooley, administrator, vs.. Aug.
Lecog ct alt. J. Cooley. Mari Foute:
Bank of New Orleans vs. 9. Fellowes & Lee
Elmore & King. Harrison g. Hunton
b. A. Yorke VS.. E. B. FallsE D. Craig. Geo.
S. Lacey.
D. yerges vs. o'Connor & wife-C. Dufour. 7.
4. Biiauet VS.. J. B. PiralleL. Castera Train
B. saulie, syndic VS.. Mrs. sauvage-L. Castera.
| Il. r. Grandmont.
j. N. Tusacgues vs.. L. Richelinp-C. Dufour. L.
| Duvigneaud. l
q. n. Alter VS.. W. A. Gordon-Geo. L. Bright.
| Hyre & Gordon.
| FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
| Lea & Leavitt vs.. S. H. Gilman-Eggleston
Hart. J. E. Trudeau.
Geo. W. sizer vs.. Jno. C. Barei-Hunt e. Den
| eyre. solfnOnQS a. rem.
i r. r. Barrow VS.. l.. b. Blades-I. j. Wallon.
Randolph, Singleton Hardie.
Richard W. Graves VS.. Belocq, Noblom & CO.
c. F. Bemiss. J. L. Tissott.
VIM. r. Burch VS.. Hy. Shepherd, Jr.-Hays d
Adams. Saucier & Michanard. ..
Mrs. A. r. Henderson vs.. R. NJ. Montgomery
Mari & Foute. J. B. Cotton.
yelling Coffin & Co. vs.. Theodore Frois Il Co.
H. C. Miller. A. l.. Tissot.
| G. B. Reese. Sons & Co. VS.. Theo Frols d Co.
Egtieston & Hart A. h.. Iissot.
4 WE'LL & Bro. vs. Stuart u Jarnes-bradlofa 4"
Land. Lacey, Hays & Adams
Il FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
James Ready vs. William and James Jay.-Whit-
taker Fellows Mills. Race u Foster.
A. W. Buddendorf VS.. Henry Y: Baxter-Atocha
& Howe. Whitaker, Fellows Mills.
: G. 7. Buddecke vs. John ID. Elllott Ell ais'--E'
, Bermudez. Mari & Foute. ,
T. Fl. Kennedy, Semmes 81 Mott. J. G: Mcconnell
D. Weaver, for use, etc; rs. T. j.. d N. A. Nc
Gee-Harrison & Hunton. Mig y Robertson.
Lichtenstein Bros H. G. Zippe-J. NJ Dir
hammer. Z. j. Wenck. ,
Menken Bros & Co. vs. A. Lewis-Harrison
Y FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
n A. Lesseps VS.. G. G. Richter ct al.-Morgan
q New Warren i Foute.
> Jas. H. Adams VS.. Daniel Fairex-H. T. De
Il beux. Huntington. .,u
o Bank of America VS.. G, L. Dolson Son-Johl
a SON. Denis g. Co. Durant & HoTnor.
VIM R. Crane vs.. A. Trudeau ct als-Durant {
. Hornor. Defendant p. p.
Mary Lee, executor, vs.. WIN. baf1et'--H' "
]. Huntingdon Frank Haynes.
i. VIM. L. Lanser VS.. Black & Byington-Morga
II & New. Davidson. ,
I'll Succession of Brefferlh vs.. Louis Brefferlh-l
E. Laresche. D. Brunei. n,,
ar j. W. Reynolds VS.. 3. Slmonds-t. A. breau@
a., o., 6. H. Henricks vs.. J. Observation-Disclosures
-. Honor. R. II. Grandmont. 1.,o
1g Mary Hermann vs. A. Hermann-T' L. Lemle
or +. Pratts VS.. A. P. Noblom-Morgan New.
on L. Tissot ~.
'o Union Bank of Tennessee vs.. Nixon q Co., (tV
70, caseg)-Durant & Hornor. Hayes q Adams.
lie Planters Bank Of Tennessee VS.. Union BANK
1st Durant & Hornor. G. l.. Bright.
W SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
,er Geo R. Beard vs.. Simon & Renard-John He
,so derson. l.. Castera. ~
80 A. Iaferest Vs. his creditors and the cTeulIoIs
aid Lalorest d Demare-G. Schmidt. Stewart
~, ], 3. Gebeln VS.. W. A. Hamilton and G.
.oIf Scott-Geo. S. Lacey. Cotler u Hawklns.
eh Michael Gernou vs.. W. W. Handiln-teo.
Llrs Bright. W w. Handlin.
to A. Marchand vs. James Coyle-Durant& Horn
will Buchanan il Gilmore.
no UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
a. Marquise de Ia Valette and husband vs.. Il.
'no Jones and Connolly IL Co--BuChanah u h4lnlo
IVY, John Henderson, Jr.
rn lea & Leayitt vs.. Hobart Fosters. H. Tor
and J. K GoOdlOc. :.
HDstaItef
ms A. Fellows A. Miller.
Use, - = - r, :,
ers "CArHERIHE TIE GREAT" AT FANCY RA
ei' The stag of the evening at the fancy ball at
nto ministry of foreign affairs, Paris, recently,
Of Princess Rimski Korsakoit, who personited Cat
the rne the Great, at the incredible cost OF two
~, lions of francs. The story runs that she recel
sup her dress only the day before from her husba
Orn, Prince Korsakoff, now in Russia. 1t was m
own with scrupuous attention to accuracy, aGcord
40. to a portrait at the winter palace OF the Emp
, Catharine in her coronation robes. The tram
8 skirt were Of blue velvet, caborately embroide
with silver, and trimmed with Siberian marten
cock The head dress (and towering and barb9rous
,vv flee it looked though picturesque withal
~ moreover fur, literally covered with diamonds
eralds, and the rarest kind of pearls. A We
old Venetian lace descended from the cap,
tdl, completely enveloped the wearer's person
with gloves and fan were got up in an equally eHpen
a;r,5 STYLE tt was remarked, as an extraordinary
~ age to the beauty and attractive appearance o.
4eaS fair Russian who represented the Empress Cathf
that though three thousand persons were pa'
like sardines in Madame de L Hups saloons, eN
| dry body made way for the Princess Rimski korsa
+ Al and she was able to pass, without inconvenie
~ from room to room, trailing after her upwar
tfee'' ,three yards of velvet. ......
they 3 ------a- =
shest TIE PRIEST AND THE DEvIL.-They tell
dow md wire n n