The Kenosha telegraph. [volume] (Kenosha, Wis.) 1860-1888, 1866-11-29

Trespass. j. j. Petit for Pl'ff, o. s. & F. H
Head for Deft. Judgment for PIffby stipula
ton.
6. Nelson Delap ag'st Geo. s. Taber. O. s
& F. Fl. Head for Pl'ff, Matt. H. Carpenter fol
Deft. The Jury in this action were called and
sworn, and the first witness on the part of the
defence sworn when the Deft moved to amend
his answer by adding a counter claim and ask.
ing for equitable relief, which after agreement
of counsel was granted by the Court and the
action continued.
Orrin B. Houghton ag'st Thos. Carter ct. al.
Assumpsit. ]. J. Petit for Plff, Head and
Schoff for Defts Continued generally by con.
sent of parties.
Jacob Karber agst VIM. Tobin and Peter
Nellis. Trespass. Head and Schoff for Ppf.
I. w. Webster for Def'tS This action was
closely contested several witnesses were sworn
upon each side and three days of the term were
occupied upon the trial, and resulted in YER
dict for the Def'ts.
The Kenosha County Bank ag'st Geo. F. Har-
ding. Head & Schoff for Plf, j. B. Jilsun for
Deft. Continued on application of Plff, on
payment of ten dollars and the costs of the
term.
VIM. W. Baker VS.. Hudson Fox. Head &
Schoff for Plf, no appearance for Deft. Judg-
ment for Plff.
ESTATE VS.. Philo Curtis Indictment for Sc
duction. On suggestion of the District Atty
of the marriage of the Deft. with the complain
ing witness, subsequent to the filing of the In
dictment, the Court ordered roHe prosequi to
be entered.
State VS. Howard B. Woodward. Indictment
for Larceny. Prisoner arranged in open Court
plead guilty and was sentenced to two wears
in the State Prison.
State VS.. Ferdinand Gaulkie-Indictment
for burning Show Wagon. Bail forfeited
Frederick Robinson vs.. Peter H. Wood
Assumpsit. 1. w. Webster for plaintiff, no
appearance for defendant. Judgment for DIFF.
Casper M. Rouse, VS.. Calvin L. Ely-As-
sumpsit. j. j. Petit for pl'ff, Head & Schoff
for defendant. Continued on application of
def'ts on payment of ten dollars and costs of
the term.
Chicago & Milwaukee R. R. Company, ap-
pellants, VS.. James B. Pomeroy, respondent
Action for damage for right of way Head &
Schof, for appellant, j. Petit for respond
ent. Continued on application of appellant
on payment of ten dollars and the costs of the
term.
Silas Fl. Jennison, VS.. John Crowley-Re-
plevin. o. g. & F. H. Head for pl'ff, 1. w.
Webster for def't. Verdict for def't.
State VS.. Ross Bell-Indictment for assault
with intent to kill. NJ. Dresser & 1. W. Web.
ster for the State, Head & Schoff for delft
This was the second trial of this action, the
jury failing to agree. The jury at this term
were impanelled and sworn on the evening of
the 10th, and were discharged on the Goth,
they also failing to agree upon verdict
Fanny Arnolds VS.. John Arnolds-Petition
for Divorce. A. G. Cole for Prff, no appear.
ance for Deft. Verdict for pl'ff
Henry Hundermarch, VS.. John Underland-
Head &Schoff for Pl'f, I. w. Webster fol
Deft. Assumpsit. Verdict for Prf.
VIM. Crawford, VS.. Ross Bell-Action fol
personal injuries. Dresser 81 Webster for pl'ff
Head & Schoff for delft. Continued on the
ground of not being properly noticed for trial
Matilda Gallager, APPELLANT, VS.. Edward H
Cosgrave, Respondent. j. Petit for plff
Head & schoff for def't.
Josephene Misch and John Misch, vs. Jacot
Schlitz-I. W. Webster for plffs, Head &
Schoff for def't. Order of Reference filed and
cause continued.
Kelley & Kelley VS.. Gleason & Gleason
SANDER. Head & Schoff for prfs, j. j. Petit
for defts. Continued by consent of parties OF
payment of ten dollars.
Frederick Robinson VS.. Nathan A. Brown
Foreclosure of Mortgage. I. w. Webster TO
pl'f, no appearance for def't. Judgment TO
pPf.
John Bingen VS.. Writ & Weir-Action TO
personal damages. Head & Schoff for pl'ff,
w. Webster for def'ts. Verdict for plff. Mo
ton for new trial filed by PITTS. Att'ys. Mo
ton over-ruled by the court, to which PHI
excerpts.
Jas. McKesson VS.. John H. Brown-Heat
& Schoff for prf, 1. W. Webster for def't.-
Judgment for pl'ff.
John Bingen vs.. Writ & Weir. Motion 70
new trial filed by Pl'ff's Att'ys; motion argue,
and over-ruled by the court.
| OCOs Ii. l. du1 fo. 1lC SlCJ vi NCuOSud--N
H. Joy for pl'f, Head & Schoff for def't. Con
tinued by consent of parties to February term
Benin F. Jones, ct al. VS.. Peter II. Wood
Head & Schoff for pl'ff, j. J. Petit for def't.-
Judgment for pl'ff.
Harmon Lies VS.. Henry Lies-Webster ,
Baker for plf, Head & Schoff for def't Juds
ment for pPff.
Bernard Lies VS.. Henry Lies-Webster
Baker for ppf, Head & Schoff for deff7t Judg
ment for plff.
S. c. Parsons, Ex'r. &c.vs. Roswell c. Oti
Foreclosure. Head & Schoff sfor prf, j. ]
Jilsun, for def't.
There were five actions of foreclosure ent
tied as above, in each of which was q decree
foreclosure and sale of mortgaged premises