New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1866-02-27

1ze Tina @! YESTERDAY copie, oGr paragraph
/ Of Ss'u-lo., IN which vc stated that orders
were Issued Tor prohibiting the transmission Of
the President, speech to this city on Thursday
night ia,i. and says:
We have oyr-y reason 70 believe that thu is purely
came tl.G.gl good season. no order was given ly
snY BODY a.yvhrFc OF a any time for II. suppression
q: ccIsse 10 .ach order va, eses Feyokc.' nor bad
The Cover rcn' anything shaisves 10 10 Win the
publication % the speech.
Noioly Ia, said, ilat we know Of, that an
order sas gwen for tAe suppression Of the copy
,ent 70 Ihc Tinrs We certainly aid no such
! hing, b.. spoLo only of that sent 10 H., and
! Ion tha' assertion Hc had the authority OF the
agent o.. the Associated Prs We can con
ccige Of very good reason why The version
cent 2, TIE T,,nes should not b. meddled with
That that paper VA. 70 make some such c'n-
mig denial Ms hi. yesterday Of what nobody
hI, asserted seems To have been known at
Washington Yesterday, Chronicle say:
We understand tina, certain %; tie friends OF the
Prc.dan. making earnest efforts 10 explain away
the interference wGh he telegraph on the night 81 the
q ..st. n order TO suppress dispatches giving the
literal and u.geyisoL version OF the BOW nooTs
ous harangu' delivered IA mont Of toe
. White House ou that dny. 4 leading Administration
uaper published in Sen. YORK viii probably contain in
il. to-day white washing statement IN TIL, sub
jec' but the public viii not forge. the indspuiabe fact
that certain unexplained obstacles were inerposed to
prevent ANYTHING but the report Of the speech .uf shed
los he Associated Pres and revised by the President
, IRON going over The wires.
The Washington correspondent OF The Boston
Daily 1dr,riis,r also SAYS in reference to the
interference with the transmission of the
speech:
one or two fncis connected with the publication Of
the President. speech Of such interest and
character TO warrant mention IN these dispatches
Three reports Of that speech have been given 10 the
county fret. report carefully revised bS the Presi
dent hin self; second n port somewhat toned down
BY kindly and intelligent reporter. and third. re-
port OF the offensive haranguc rset rs actually de
livered from the pOItico Of the White House. The
promoters Of the meeting tie new conhdanis OF the
Executive. very anxious TO circulate the hrst'
of these reports, and gave assurances 70
CORES pondents even at midnight that u would
be IN for the early morning editions oil
papers in any city They also very anxious that
the nst mentioned report should not be generally
circulated and II 10 suggestive circumstance III tls
connection that though the copy thereof was filed for
teegraphing within few minutes Of ii O'Clock. the
papers 10 which IL was sent. even AT points no more
remote than Baltimore and Philadelphia, were Obliged
10 20 10 press at three o'clock with only small portion
of the speech and that the aud least Offensive por
ton. 1t is presumed that this statement OF facts viii
carry its own inference.
We alluded TO the matter OF Saturday, not
by way of complaint, but simply to explain
why we were compelled to put in a postscript
the copy that came to u so late. Whoever
il was that caused that delay was, We think, to
be commended for entertaining a doubt as 10
the propriety of making the speech public. As
il would have been well had the speech never
Io.p made 81 II uould have hncu well had If
been suppressed altogether, had that been pos
sible. But these short hand "cheis' are diff.
cult to put down.