The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1866-05-12
NeaO Advertisements.

John H. Mccoy vs. MARY ANN Nc
ID COY, LEONARD j. BEELY, EFT. ALL
IN the Circuit Court for Baltimore countf-''s
Equity.
The object Of this suit is to procure decree
for the sale of certain real estate in Baltimore
county, containing nine acres of land, OF which
John Mccoy died seized and possessed, for dl-
vision amongst his heirs at law.
The Bill states that John Mccoy, otherwise
called John Mickey, was, in his life time, selz-
ed and possessed Of certain real estate which
is particularly described in the bill and ac-
companying exhibit; that the said John Nc
Coy died some time in the year 1857 or 1855.
intcstate, leaving John H. Mccoy, Ellen Res@
Ann Mccoy, now the wife of Leonard }. 1S$eiy'
Lavina Mccoy and Mary Ann McCq1,- ms on
" children aud heirs at laIuy-1ru aary Ann
Mccoy his WIDOW, surviving him That Ellen
Rose Ann Mccoy intermarried with said Leon
ard J. Seely, of the State of New Jersey, after
the death Of said John Mccoy, and that said
Ellen Rose Ann Seely is now living separate
and apart from her said husband and is now
residing in Baltimore county, and that said
Leonard j. Seely resides out of the State Of
Maryland and that it will be for the interest,
benefit and advantage of the said Mary A. Nc
Coy, widow, Ellen Rose Ann Seely and Leon
ard j. Seely, Lavina Mccoy, Mary Ann Me-
Coy and said John H. Mccoy, to sell said real
estate for division amongst them and that the
same is not susceptible Of division or partition
amongst them without a sale thereof That
said Ellen Rose Ann Seely, Lavinia Mccoy and
Mary A. Mccoy are infants, under twenty-one
years OF age, and sale thereof cannot be had
thereof without the assistance of this Court.
The amended bill of the complainant states,
by way of amendment to the original bill, that
the charge therein made that Ellen Rose Ann
Mccoy intermarried with said Leonard J. See
ly, of New Jersey, after the death of John Nc
Coy, is mistake in fact, and that the truth
and fact are that said Ellen Rose Ann Mccoy
did not marry said Seely, but on the contrary,
she has never married any one, but she is now
and always has been single and unmarried and
an infant under the age of twenty-one years.
That Mary Ann Mccoy, the sister of the com
plainant, intermarried with the said Leonard
j. Seely, of the State of New Jersey, some time
in the year 1854, after the death Of said John
Mccoy. That said Leonard j. Seely is not q
citizen of the State of Maryland, and does not
reside therein, but resides out of the State of
Maryland, and that his wife, the said Mary
Ann Seely, is living separate and apart from
her said husband, Leonard j. Seely, and is now
residing in Baltimore.county and State of Ma
ryland, and within the jurisdiction of this
Court; and that said Mary Ann Seely, Lavinia
Mccoy and Ellen Rose Ann Mccoy are infants
under the age of twenty-one years.
1t is thereupon adjudged and ordered that
the complainant by causing copy of this or
der to be published and inserted in some ews-
paper published in Baltimore county, once in
each of four successive weeks before the 18th
day of June, 1856, give notice to said absent
defendant Leonard j. Seely, of the object and
substance of this original and amended bill,
and warn him to appear in this Court, in person
or by solicitor,
on or before the 18th day Of September, 1866,
to answer the premises and show cause if any
he has why the relief prayed should not be
granted and q decree ought not to pass as
prayed.
JOHN H. LoNGNECKER, Clerk.
True Copy-Test:
JOHN H. LoNGNEcKER, Clerk.
Nav 11-lt