New Orleans daily crescent., 1866-01-30

WQn1an u DO ssYgtt HSAts as syh ssf S9k4 A3s t 4$
shIldref IN tijs den as Il,apy as YSeSs
veaasa and e1IIdrsn tsss bern quartsfsd q 81
asvs u iis lie NJ p ''ssa e8 '4s
: ss III n.
/ ss s d[lif lIbanrfs
" 81 - Egs "a
3 -
NJ n - n f1tss
lss
3 ssIhR 9slzr - ~ Sshgt e Roy
Il Il Z. EssfsaA "a "A aIsy I,nraAs
Hovnors Fzshs 9n5lD 8 s' % %sseS
" hlows, IN t;s u Il M
u s
Succession - Tiios 0 Tx &ii1 II 4 II "a.
bert for curatss Bdehensn ~ ij1oes ~
ksY. z. Hnnt rs banistez,s esec 4.
". o. Hitehs5 !. Z. snoa md essx S: d.
- z, bf,gnIs 5 "a bIchsasn q l
and q Collins, Bradford Fianey BIss
. II, n. Taylor ~ (htys of NeN OrIe ~ u
;hqTgan' q 8 q y: Huyssrgd don.
w Z f,san, tsstlnessosy ssscusor;; & Hsr
m1uez Tor appelee ~ ~ Bonf0r1 @ a sS
,,s,,,a = q .la paIsss ss ysssPh Plssss
Parker g q All. dsisnss v; asd a saad
q. Bernard warrant ~ appellants LsgeH " WI
Esanss EssmsHd I, 8 e..s; p Bonfssd Hunt T nsHssrs
Aanipl.s gouchsrd y. Eslnssr ana ,sAsfl
Lorsnsteln, interyenar tsefi8Ns q e M IS
". a,iarsoa ,n - ~ ~
% tinney, DHrant e d1rnpr sA$ VGNS
gr. popisson and Josegs IAlands
Jefersch p. Dafour for pssintiH p = s
Dngua for defendants. $ss 5Sssss III Id
Norton, y iHos- a E. e ses.
FIRST nIsTRIcT 's & n. counT.
The state Of Louisiana WI Charles M Dafy Il
charged With murder. ssss
aEcoap DISTINCT co.'ls1,
e pss,gs pser6ss nisbamar rros r;1a pnaa
Us s vi 7 ose m
terra, sam.;oia q Dneros. .sssg ssss NV sEs
g 81 Meiaer1s Soa pell1lon eis
.J ". bsnnan IS Thos. 500, executor of Wood,
s.,, I,
N 4 .Saol 49, 4. Il, 49,
II. l, MaheETs. i,,l sshooner Glonate eMes q
a. !. p. 4 IN n pass5s e.4 81 & s -
as;ps s ~ T.
Van Dolson.. :, BY Y s.. y
20 =. Eitznmons vs. vs. q. Ho osfsil Emerson -
buad g a'eIn6erIz q vs. ~ y, hsilsaaaou w
s,s;.ar A. - r., f,,n
Thomas, III Castera sss' M al 7s SHs
Lanbias n, Doekter VA j. IonsSafi ss,amboia A. #
Ducros, ]. lombard
don ais Philipss IL III Lew W.T., 4 w e''' ~
r. S. Byron vs.. il Il Tssot, ct ali; p. s.. Byron #
Duyignand HTssos. s' Il s's' ~
Jahn MeFynnald svs ri Hayss NV fy, Tnad u,
Dufnar. s5 Ss,a.ss
seSn naFss deiaadant sSns ss II psrson asnr
b. Fanchst Vi. 9. sTibIier: C Dufour 81 u.
Tisset &
Charles y Alter vs. john ~ Grass; ElnQFea& s
| kngi John y. Honano. ~ w
FOURTH DISTRICT eoURT
Henry g. Could w. Cheeseman Il Marshall Sim
gleton y IfasdGe, Bradford. Lea " Fintaey ss a
John L. ainnott vs. r, w. Mstthews Ogden u
CIaiborne, hs Derbss. ss,''ss
r. w Estlin ys. Captain BaTzes md owness of IN
steamboat Eieta; " >, standbTry Rage q Foster.
VIM Jndsen vs.. Captain 4 kinfball ct al; haaja
min, Brndfald " Finney, Race y Festers Aea, Ss
Mari and Rrlekelis s2 8 WE sss
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
All W Baanet va AZ q Re- sst /, sf, Tlr.fray ~ "a
Wharton Ssoilins Nssr
w. J. Cooney rs John " Bopert. * naA,aop
Miller, Wfisaker, Fellows and Mills.
and Hnnton HINT and Denepre gss "a aHasSTTT
Il. s. Vessser vs. A. b. Trpler: H. RS Grand. S.
mont WI 81 Scott. s s sS8s sssssa
IL d. white va pontchas,srain RaiIrosxsS IA sft s9;
alsC Mprel q. Briggs MiehiDard sE 8 g ss1,ss Sz
N Edward Burke et al. vs. CITY of Nes Orleans
Thos. S. MeCay, r. King Catler.
e . $50 = F1 ~ seslsn oo1 hks 4
Goldsaita hanef ys; q; n RIIe dlander
a, 10 ler, ,hoseius q phalps.
son, A. tanonge.
BoMsrt Garner " HarEison VS.. MefEisaaa u Ken
nedy George L. Bright, Mallory
Mary Herman vs.. sAuahony Hermars "a q. Lem
ley, N. N. Cohen, gglestor. alss sss
Stawart q Baer vs.. campbell a Asssdx ~. II. 81
" ~ NJ. Burbank vs.. l.. Bloom i Whitaker, Fes-
lows SO, q Mills, u .. ~ facey.
sueRRME COURT or LoulsIAa ~. coiDENsEp DIES
Daniel Jee anrellant. VI. Hpab M Il sar,,s,
anpallee appeai rom the seeopd Ga,gsssss
NV nrlsanss ,.
tIat t6e adamenbn ta Bit W. w
aud reversed; that the exec Itiea ID Ne inrisi on
of the Court be aver rled nd that t I'd u M *
mandcd 10 be proceeded With. III accoraanoe to
law, and that tie defendan rand !aselles PSI the
costs Of this appeal. So
State of Louisiana VS. Iean ISa3esse and fss Bes
mott security on the bond. Alsseal from DE SEQ
end judicial District Caurt; parish of 4arson.
Jean Defesses was arrested On sharge of arcsny
@. Benoit was his suret in the sam of to a
4 pear and answer at thstima % trial. DasSsse aid
4 not appear. The bend WAS consequently for-
Erested ansfried Besoit tsst rllle to s,as canse
WY ne should not be hnnAas rom
apY or I'M eoa Ile aseara anp'ss u,
the aceEssu IS now uslaer y new uonua sM 'ls av-s
pearance before the ssrsss court g asMe lo
sharge. is lofsr tri ifsa ~ X