Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1866-03-27

By hr ssewsst tclsi.s,-B0 psz ssr sasss
IN the kesistsrs once. ra-s>d. Bin Tor Ne re-
Hr. fery uecr csiIso Spthe otn % heenee les
desItrs; which sfter come debate we orderes
90 bs printed and lnid over.
p. ss1 n .sesr. Y gs, ne s S e sss ..s
with an srnsndmsnL which was ooucurrsd IN.
Hr Joyce cslled up ne bin TO hcense ana
| motion II was made the special for ths nexf
/ meeting.
The IAN from the Aldermen 70 lay pave
ment on the north eide of street south, be-
tween I'd and Sd streets; was referred.
tne oiff prescr1nine the manner IN which The
cohuacts Tor lay ing watrr mains shall Be LAID
Was returned from the Aldermen, and the
Council rsceoed from their amendment ciyld.
irg the city into seven districts
Inc PRESIDENT 10 obviste q dificulty, the ball
three daily papers before the nrst OF April for
proposals, ofrrrd n resolution Amending the
Dill nlli 20 ss TO authorlse the Mayor 10 advertise
nToYr.I y, AL wi'nin ten days After the ap-
Mr.. wnrht moved 20 take y the oil, % epen
ON s,reet, Rom the canal TO Maine avenue,
staunf tnaf the opening would greatly Improve
the mall, and be Of great convenience 70 per
sens residing In the seventh Ward; and al tha
same time be stated he had no reference 70 .
The Chair (Mr. Moore) .usgeoted that the
motion bad letter be- withdrawn. as a bin he
( re the Aldermen, passed by the Council gives
auth GRITTY for a railroad company Tthe wash
IEgtCn. Alexandra and George.ownl 20 omen
AID keep IN repair this street which company
relinquish their night 20 lay another track In
7tb street. while the bill proposed TO be taken
up throws the expense on the city.
Mr.. Peugh referred TO the tardiness IN which
pills were acted on BY the upper Board, and
me fact that the corporation had never aided =
railroad company, expressing the hope that
the bill before the Aldermen would become a
law. ....-. ........-... ..
Mr.. Wright withdrew his motion.
On motion Of Mr. Mead, the bill 20 improve
The east end Of the Washington canal was Ia
Mr.. Ferguson moved to recommit the hill
with instructions to report a bill 10 build a
new wharf, which motion, after some debate
AT 10 O'Clock the Board an journed.
u. 3 SUPREME CoURT. March e6-wm. r
Smyth, Esq, Of Massachusetts, Charles II. y
Williams, Jr., Esq, Of New York. were ad-
mltted attorneys and counseilors of this court.
MIR. Chief Justice Chase announced to the
bar that next Friday being G Jod Friday, tins
bear m otions on Thursday
No. l27. Maria TeOdora Prralta, appellant
VS.. the Unitsd Statss. Appeal from the Dir
tTict Court of the United States FOR the North
ern District of California. Mr.. Justice Davis
delivered the opinion Of the said District Court
No. I54. Charles H. Daniels, &c, plaintiff
ys. the Chicago and Rock Island Railroad
Company. On a certificate of dI vision IN opin-
ion betw cen the Judges of the Circuit Court OF
the United States for the Northern District OF
Illinois. MIR. Justice Swayne deli iyered the
opinion OF the Court. dismissing thus canse for
the want OF jurisdiction, and rrmaudIng the
cause for proceedings in conformity 70 law
No. 3il. The UnIInd States plaIntiff in error,
vs.. Robert X. CHtting 81 al In error ~ the
Circuit Court Of the United States for the
southern District OF New York. Mr.. Justice
GrIer delivered the opInion OF the Court re-
versing the Judgment Of the said CIrcuit Court
and remandIng the cause, with directions 10
award renire fdcias de
No. 3l2. The Guited States, plaintiffs in error,
ys. Harvey fisk ct al. In error Ia the Circuit
district OF New York. Mr.. Justice Grier de-
hNered the opinion u the Court affirming the
judgment OF the SAID Circuit Court an this
cause.
No. 16I John Mctiuire, plaintiff in error. Va
the State Of Massachusetts. In error TO the
Supreme Court for the State Of Massachusetts,
Mr.. Justice Nelson delivered theopinion ofthe
Court, affirming the judgment Of the said Su-
preme Court in this cauee, with costs.
No. 2s6. q. Clarence Churchill, &c, PLAIN
TN in error, VS.. The city Of Utica.
tiff in error. VS.. Michael N. Nolan ct al.
No. 2se. Adsm Van Allen, &c, plaintiff in
error, err We: Miehaei a Nolan ct al: ErrOrs 70
York. Mr. Justice Nelson delivered the opIn-
ion OF the Court remanding the causes, with
diIecnons to enter Judgment in that court for
A
No, l26. The schooner Stephen Hart, 6e., ap-
pellants, VS.. the United States. Appeal from
the District Court United Sta ties for the Sou IN
| eTn District of New York Mr.. Chief Justice
Chase delivered the opinion OF the Court. az
firming the decree of the said Distret6ourt in
this cause. ..-........ .------..--
in. Warren vs.. Morris s. Van Buskirk et
al, and Hannibal Green vs.. Morris ;. Van
Buskirk ct al Errors the Supreme Court OF
the state OF New York Mr.. Chief Justice
Chase delivered the opinion OF the Court
granting the motion in these cases
No 81. The United States, plaintiffs, vs. Rs-
fus II. Nassar .a. ... 'i,f
No l2s: The United Sta,ee, plaintiff. IN er-
rOr We. Samuel Schueen1en.
No. I3e. The United States plaintiffs in ar.
rcr, Ys. Thomas Green.
No. l31. The United States, plaintiffs IN er-
ror, VS.. John Beatty.
Ne. l32. The URlied States, plaintiffs in er-
ror, We. John Shelly.
No. l33 The Uniied States, plaintiffs in en-
ror, VS.. Frank Bowen.
Ordered by the Court that these causes be
continued TO the next term.
No. l16. The United States, appellants, We.
the steamer VICTOR and cargo.
No PIP. The steamer Victor and cargo, Sp-
peJlants, VS.. the United States. ---.-. -
The argument of these causes was continued
by Mr.. Larocque for the claimants, and con-
cluded by Mr.. Ashton for the United States
No. 2i2. The steamer Victor and cargo, ap-
pellsnts, VS.. the United States. Ordered by
The Court that this cause be dismissed for the
want OF jurisdiction.
Nos. LIS and I36. Cornelius T.. Buck plain
tiff in error, VS.. Horace n. Cobalt. and Cor
nslius y. Buck VS.. Horace n. Cobalt.
The argument Of these causes was COM
menced by hr. Peekham tor the plaintiff in
error;