New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-07-18
bort Uarorn's Notire.
LAW INrKIL.GENCE.
United STATES COMMISSIONERS OFFICE-Juir II.
L,f a. Camwssi,ne' OsBfA
n RI CCUNTERI EIriNG.

UNITED STATES COMMISSIONERS OFFIcE-JuIr H.
b,f a. Camwissi'nei OsBfA
NJ RE- CCUSTERI EIrlNG.
TIE Uni,ed saes AT. Hairy Holmes alias j..
The defen0ent IL tie man n at induced one EIWln
Langton aork 10 n" Ccnl'nens bsns S's S.n
nom them i'm fes-"rs le Of - National hHDs boFs
Langtor bic father ard woman narsf Mnle IS az
vsr. ali co this irans.con. Nj nh lhPtn ~
tended she Pre,re,, nnd an the tss sd sur
ceecsd In earr Impressions soDe WHOM ere we
atrd couutsfei 500 Compound lnt'rest treasury
IBIS ~ these not, The United States Government has mo
iupre,on II all - paris helongi' to che pr 1e ~
Sswsrt ON hshs tie prison asked q Of hev migi r-
leased or bill Tie Dsti ici Attorney SAID 20 was wns.
prnrid d u ey Eonld furIsb hG IN the SUM II o,LVOo
parte being unale 70 give bill removed to prison.
SUPREME couRr-cHAxDEts-JuLr i7-BeOrs Justice
CLgRKE
APPLICATION PoR THE REMOVAL OF AssiGNEEs'
In the matter of the First National Bank OF Meads.
vile Penny yspa for the removed Of samuel r. anu
the petitioners cu they have filed their inventory ac
cordng Lw aud that thy have served Their egpGO
,Sot tn The G psUrI. sad .s7es decn
TIE HoBoKEs BANK FRAUD CASE.
The peotl agt George W. Chadwick and Samuel Jackson
The defendants are implicated IN the H0oOken
Rank fraud cause their to-day endeasoed u pro-
mel on s Tine Court denied the motion
and the prisoners were reInandeo.
In re- the Attachment against Mn. d. A. Fowbr-Ths
motion came or 10 be before Justice Cerke to-day
to n SS n. 70 u iass Of A. r the
certain moneys supposed TO have been received Ny
MI Yard % behalf defendant srenuoasiy ina,ted
that the widow responsible for the debts Of her iae
espcay received by him IN the
capacity Of Deputy County Clerk and that the moneys re-
bad been paid He alluded With nnca telling 70
the fact tina. Mr. Fowler had Clerk for many years and
his record him hare been faithful officer both TO
and Bar and urged that to have HIS widow
for sots him oud be nsn to the Bar se Court
ard the generous pubc whose servan he had o1g zen
Mr.. W. s. Yard for the defendant Mr. A K Dye3 op-
posed
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs-rH.snzrs-Jurr IL
Before JUDGE BRADY.
Jro. F. Newkirf ACT. The Russell File Company.
In this case, already reported, the Judge granted
to allow the defendants declare ddsnd account Othe
actual profits Of the concern
Before Judge CARDozo
THK EICIsR LAW AND THE UNLIcENsBB LIQUOR
DEALERs.
Jeremiah Drscoi sgt. jackson s Schultz ct al
This was the selected TO test the power OF the
either under the Excise Law. Judge
Csrdozo rendered the following opinion
vS ss. n'ssS ny o TO As nvy
Of prl H. 1866 That question was rightly treated
on the argument regarded udcatG until
Il IL presented 70 the General Term and ten il will not be
difficult that the little In the shape Of gd' argument
which and improperly has been ATTEMPTED
be advanced against It. rnsouud and aoious alike In law
and morsl That decision ectualy dposes Of the present
thar the under preence Of alleged which
legal effect has been DECLARED to have no Existence ~ IN
erfcrnR of the pantihs and the ahdavs
In opposition the motion show this 70 be the Tact IL "a
claimed that aush appears pon the lace Of the complaint
lawful 10 plaintiffs occupations and The defendants seng
pretended statute which Las been pronounced unco
tution ana void psser and cannot be heard
QUESTION the legitimacy Of the plaintiffs business OF bis
awyer 10 require citation authority The notion TO
continue the bjuncon be granted with $40 costs II
the phraseoogy the Injunction should need amendsn so IS
10 eec-which by practical coDstruci"n has been
have been NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. clear and eI
phciI Of course that may he allowed"