New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-05-24
Case or Ztno Buruha m.

10 ~, Tdit, II lie y. y TSibHaG
Sic: There is very little the pas, which should mu-
saeoI, germns;e sGeeon toward your
journal You have quietly 'ba'sd from time to time dans
pe y,. and have borne with patient shrus" The
wort iron may however do coed son and
editor. fall within this Qualification sometimes ion perfectly
t 10 your defense the Tor having pdoued Ieno
ham only ek,wsrm and husf stand in the matter
would maie you tand In better position before The
livery rgh minded lawyer must form professional
standpoint oos upon the conviction Of this with grief
Tho en' p-ons friendship toward the Judge who presided
ard The abe and bs assistant who prosecuted
nfrgcd when say that there unjust TOR more
ndeen.be conviction obtained Of justice than that Of
Bunhsm H-r- the evidence the larceny with which Burn
charged lam making literal abstract from the notes u
- pier tie Court Of the testimony Of Mrs sIeb
bins. tie prosecgtrI;
O. State how this 600 bond be given to Buuhom by
Beesu.e my bond. sOdbeang therefore thought
would have them broken no; let hin have II with tie
Mr ala be woa Tsy me- back on Monday aoin iha
al that oos place that be would give baek to me on Monday
morning les, the amount Of ny bill
q gave BIN e $50 bond with the understanding tia, he
a. lie .a . he would retain Monday morning less the
O Did he y.Iurn the balance or the bondi
A. lie aoi done either
Upon this ,e,tmony accused convicted Of aesny The
serd the element of ordinary
properly voluntarily parted with by the Pro'eeu'I
under promise being returned to her The fact that Burn
what Of associate counsel on the part
Defense called general principle and In viouton Of law
his able right when he granted pardon am not Repub'
csn PARTY Of that mubu'ed word and Therefore nn
not called upon defend, political grounds, tie action
but have been worhper the shrine OF
Justice believe that who las been convicted papby
illegal should be kept moment In dure alter that Tact
developed That the Governor did not commuDeac with Mr.
Hal the DhetAtorney this subject and before granting the
pardon "a malicious IA sehood in Mr Hall, private oH-e,
the Judge Garvn Of the Superior
g" that client Burnham has taken shorter road
leading bis release han bill Of exceptions" said What do
you mran lie replied 81 hold In my hand the letter Of the
ng for information about the Bunhsm has applied
for pardon 10 your sorbook printed said Yes ALL except
ing charge Jtde Barnard Mr. Hall desired copy send
and then aud there order for copy
Mr. Csghesd the printer No o. Ceutes and Mr. Brady Of
the .taehe, in Mr. Hrs Office took g. with instructions from Mr.
Hal get mail to the Executive which serwd learned
W al done.
Gov Fenon may sins but In the Of all
that magnsnmous DO not let him be aned for doing good act
rg that d. be taken TO the Court OF Appet
that the seal Of dppoya ola high judlsl tribunal cannot be r.
revocaiy upon such startling violation Of Law this conviction.
would thea appear legal archives wonder Ia view OF the
enlightenment age aud beaeonah Of warning to the fue
RoBr. d. HoIxSs Of the Counsel Of zeno BumhaD.
Nste. York, Nay "a, 1906.