New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-08-10
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
U. S. COMMISSIONERS OFFICE-Auo. e-Dss,. c,,.,
missioner OsBORN
MORE CoUSTRRPEIrIsG

IDENTITY The 80 bill shown given BY Mr. Young or
have yen, never haA dealings with Mr. Quincy
i Ss sc, have known Mr. Young FOR three wsstsl
~ N' ny uIte STOOD between Mr. Young aud that trap
could be lad Journey did not approach Young wiS
eSvns the SO bi lad uns ssst PrsyOSs 70 n re-
Gupey arrest when Grst The bill think G1r1ey va
II bought the bill from GSTnsy aid not ave a So5SS @
me & no o a ing bought the bill Of Game,
Young told me had bought the bill Of Guney said no,sns
more then took the BILL at that time Young went away,
the Young i. at the expiration OF tss
days it was not meeting BY appointment but merely
accidental one; afterward went to Y9ungs house see
what Gurueys participation in CONTRIBUTING was thai
time and were talking about eoantereers general,
and endeayOred the bill to Quincy; did
rest Young At that time; afterweri made appointment
Young Sweeneys Hotels did not know that Young
thief; Young told his brother 10 trouble that
he possessed information Of imporance don't knov
what Induced him with the bill when Young
handed the bill be said got this from Blu Gurney 90
It'll OF August Young arrested in this building Yolns
ronei and sent to prison. he was brought to our once %
day, IN irons 49,. . 4,
the Secret Service Division OF the Government recosa
the SO bill shown it has my initials on ~ was presents
Young and Newconbe were IN ABOUT sh'
| l knew Young while ne was in Boston.
Crossexamiuei-I live New Bedford, Mass; have bssa
in the secret service December 1865 received my
pontment from ashngton first became acqlaned VITA
Young months since in Boston, while IN 1ostoa
Young said he would like 20 have an arrangement made thai
bis brother might be released from prison. the first time
the bill i, was in NewcOmoes hands Young was present ..
the time; being expert closely examined the 20 bill
made particular inquiry about The e either IS 70 where
S came IRON ia ali can think Of have told the coep
marked the BIZ for future identification Neweombe asked
mark the BILL Young was present al that time; Young
did not tell he got the bill from Quincy; be said 10 got
tho It'll Of August Young tod Inc it was tho same BIN hs
against some person who might be arrested for passing
did not know Of Young approaching Quincy with view Of
getting this bill; time when Young be sail ht
had been Missouri his BROTHER Young told me hs
G. " Yoaag sworn estiaed-I reside in hl, cIty
have been cqnoei 10 ps94 as witness mes IN 1 Gaze
| In rlyl NeWCOmDe:
ally from Carney about the stu o. July last asked GurnI
where could so counterfeit notei he said be would
get he could the time Quincy he said he
had the bill wanted and gave him sl2 50 Tor IT. wa.
said he got only for my accommodations paid the sie a
TO Gurney; the bill got from Quincy put IN my POCKET
aterwald showed 70 Mr. Hatch Hatch told me to s4os
to Mr. Nevconbe. who IN turn tod meo show 1t 70 Wood.
got it again aferwaEd this 10 the Bill originaIyh.l IN
have been IN State Prison only
was arrested for passing counterfeit money Hatch,s
Boston Hatch referred Newconbe SO the matter Of
atos To ueet Kim In to see YewcoSSe Hatch
told EewcOmbe that wanted to get some n!ormstion thas
thought might be Of some service the Government THAI
could the original ESQ plate, Mr. Ne%eonbe said be
Mr. NewcOmbe then referred mo to Mr. Wood about ny
brother getting os Oh Rgn 9 ap ne brotssr could arn az
this plate il would be of service first Sam Garney u
man was Charley, White introduced to Quincy d
White because knew something about counterfeit money
did not then want any after this got th 30 note RON m
got the note from Gurney TO show to Hatch because Hatch
wanted 10 show 1t 70 Mr. WOOD the head OF zoe d. 10.
got and gave 10 Hatch who said he wanted IT. when
first showed the bill TO Newcombe Hatcn present. whsa
saon this bi Newcombe at that time did not know
where the bill from did not tel them where IL came
from asked about IT. shortly after this Mr.
Wood told that could the plate from which this
time Newcombo was present told them thought could
get at the plate through G1rne at tbs tine TIE Oh hn Wa ST..
know where he Isl got the s2 50 out of my pocket it
furnished buy this bill from Gurneyj am
whether
been engaged buying and selling counterfeit money ds
% PST Sr Of a % xSo are in
ng but call them BY Nance marked this SO blu
d ac eIf them anf oTe 1e @ @
have had charge s5 of II hayS never %hea s"f' W.
sen, to prison on a charge Of r.bins the mall
af,erward pardoned by President Buchanan par
don e On NE IN the sIse G WsrD h o
me might 60 home ,hAi was 6ss c IN Ro,ou a
not know of any particular counterfeers in New.York
d. p. Wood Chief Of the Secret Service Division was
Yoa but from what Know Of him csa
say whether woGi believe him under oath or not IN.
trust worthy man and tia. he dealer in counterfeit
money! also instructed my agents not to believe Young an
information led to believe him eounerfeiter and ala
reputation such well knOwn and even more as one 90
gagged In fraudulent enterprises.
Adjourned to this morning al 30.
THB HUGHES BOUNTY CASE
United States agt James Hughes
In this IN which the defendant, with others, 10
charged With swlndng James Reilly bis bounty
end which from its connections with the Provost Mirshas
Department has excited considerable interest Mr. Commis
Counsel may have expected written opinion at length %
the points involved in the motion discharge in
quence Of the time taken for consideration since the argus
ment aud also on account Of The Of the sass "a
of the United States agt Peter Riley and others havs
deemed such task supeerOgaoy for the reason that the cues
tons which in that case were so ably and jateay
treated by the Court and their application to the issues here
pertinent that 1t would overSeaous part 10 ex
press de IN language the opino OF the learned
Judge when fully with him the construction Of tbs
governing this adopt his decision authority
on the question OF actual residence which determines the
gs OF the oense in the al eigaton before although
Is claimed By the prosecution the fourth the
Of March 1855 does not apply the aa, OF the com.
plain, BY reason his being discharged soldier having
liable 10 enrolment and DRAFT.
OF the opinion that the section referred TO upon the
construction laid down BY the learned Judge 10 the o. tbs
United States agt Peter Riley ct AL and understanding the
object and purpose which the enacted every
person except aliens and capable and competent
perform military duty whether liable not TO enrolment
be voluntarily euln the service is brought within the
restrictive clause OF the section and must be credited to thu
district wherein he resides and not elsewhere.
being my view Of the law. James Riley. the complain
ant was not entitled to the bounty IN question aud has a
Of complaint against the accused under the statute DO
cause the evidence shows that the Of his enlistment 81
Hoboken he a actual resident OF NewYork
Another important question is presented in this case sne
that is the Jurisdiction Of the alleged ofene bat snce have
decided that faud deprivation OF bornty has been
med by the accused against the complainant quite inns
material What my views are upon the question !. sPpss
the oense the District Court the United States o
pending against him and quite disposed to opniol
that the mater properly belongs to tss courts OF state
The defendant is discharged.
Mr.. Courtney United States District Attorney and en-
Recorder Smith FOR the prosecutions Mr. Shupe and eKJad
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C0URT-Aucusr 9-Bsfon
Judge SHiPNAS.
RETURN OF PRoCESs-DECggEs OF CONDEMNATION