New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-11-22
sIrpREsrR COURT CHAMBERLAIN. 81.

restored and contnued with costs The plaintiff 20 be paid by
the New York and Harlem Railroad Company
SUPREME COURT CHAHBBRS-Noy 81.
Before MT Justice SUTHERLAND
The A7c Mail Steamship Co sad ohsr e. HSr1on and ohcr'
The Atlantic Mail Steamship Company on the
9th Of july last by YotsOi 20 00 shares TO 1850 decided
10 enlarge their stock from I've to eight mi.o1s pawn s
Steamship Co. 1900 shares 10 the United Saies and Blzu
oo sSares go he companys notes for $4,000 be Kept
three months rom the mot and 100 shares 70 be Issued 10
payment for the Havana Line to be Withheld for SIX months
At ne election in 1865 Allen Wheeler and Gilbert were
elected inspectors OF the next election Under the transfer
Corneiqs Garrison claims Trustee for the Hewlok
Mai steamship Company to hold $40 shares Of the stock IS
inc The regular election on the 18th Of this month order Of
Injunction served on the inspectors restraining them nom
this injunction prepared surprise OF the plaintiffs
that the holders OF new portion OF ths new stock possd
10 proceed that thereupOn OF the Stockholders in coned
with Spencer X Green insisted on proceeding win
the election nominated viva inspectors OF cleo
tion. and elected The seven directors who are me qs
1? 9Ss65 sBs TINS % a'ISh Alien dosS to these in
specors protest sigucd Tor IS 200 share' parity new
elected v vote OF between 70 and n shares Of which
over OJ held by parties personally present at ana voting
tbe I'D drcors arc TIE lawful directors holding IN de
fault OF valid election and ask injunction restraining the
famed an Injunction against The Board restraining them
from acting and the now Board now move to dissolve the In
junction on the complaint and answer
Premhary long discussion 10 the right OF the
plaintiffs to the wSh adsyits plaintiff claim
ing that the containing pstte by had right TO
put in afdeyits 70 meet matter Tie defendants claim
ing that unSeI IL "a rce and the code this could not be
a9s Cctr fefved It's decision FOR this point The de-
fnants then argued the complaint alone insisting
mainly that the complaint was not suosnt 70 give me Tou
been presented the law side Of the Con 70 set aside The cleo
ton or by action in the nature o. quo tecrTonto
The argument not concluded, but was adjourned to
Friday. 80
Dunning for plaintiffs Mr. Marbary for plaintiff Allen h
r Marsh Mr. Valdepoe and eSJudge Woodruff Tor deien
dants.
DEoII0ss.
Caroline Fried ag Tie Roy1 Ins Co-Adustnent BY Clerk
affirmed Isaac WymaI agt We. BrchStay Of proceedings
ton granted with $40 costs to abide event
GENERAL TEEM-Beioge Justices BARNARD, CLEnEH and
ISGEAHM
THE oHtisTY WILL CASH AGAIS--APPEA YBoX TIE ORDER
REFUsING 10 oPLs TDE DEFAULT
Christy and others sct Clark and Others
II was supposed indeed announced in tie reports o. this
Of The Will Of n p Gh.y was ed at ne Surrorotss Court
and Affirmed was carried 20 the Genera Term Of the supreme
CPaT which sent It 70 the Scg o. Sr Issues q9 tse
PENDANTS default taken and at the last term motion
made not for recuary but the merits 20 open ts De
fault which was denied II was supposed chs ha dis
posed Of the case but appeal taken from this order
On the part appellants Argued that the
Of such importance aad doubt tha. il right full trial
should be had and that the defendants had been surprised or at
some Question too was maao o. reeaafty but the notice Of
motion not stating this the Court enpto refused to hear a.
70 the opening Of the default matter Of
discretion in the Judge ct Special Term and by wei settled
The Court reser-ed i,s decision.
f. Bankmau and jas. T. Brady for plaintiff respondents
Mr.. Clark and Mr. NJ Rvars for defendants appellants
Before Mr.. Justice MULLEN.
AN APPRAISAL CASE.
Isaac Mehrbaok agt. Charles =. Plat
Plaintiff to recover no with interest fToh The st OF
eoTnq! iS to1 segsa ' .Ss 'S had
contract with the Hudson River Railroad Company furnish
that the contract was thrown up defendant and desiring
sell his horses 10 the Company he oe s services OF plain
for me S ierce an ae 1dbens.s Of I from KS
TO defendant decreasing that the claimed that
defendant endeavored oeomprome the matter offering hloWe
had paid him for the horses but that this offer was refused
and tbat his claim Il an Sttct b1 noo aSS b Brother 70
swpde defendant out Of the sued for that he had sp
praised horses for plaintiff without charge friendly act
and thought that In calling upon plaintiff 70 apprae these
horses plaintiff would reciprocae friendly act and with
charge that the appraisal only occupied day and that
the amount claimed any eEotant that when defend
ant found plaintiff intended 10 charge for his services he
for two horses and $50 which plaintiff held stake
holder for defendant and which defendant the election
The testimony directly contradictory.
The jury directed Bring sealed verdict this morn
Henry A Mott for plaintiff Hammond Roman for de-
sEAMES's WAGES AND ALLEGED EMBEzzLEMEyT.
Charles Hernnkind agt William W. Tapscott
In this case reported yesterdays TRIBUNE and in which
alleged ENLIGHTENMENT the part Of the seamen the jury
brought in sealed verdict yesterday morning for plaintiffs
Before Mr. Justice JOSEPH F. BARNARD.
DECISION
Thomas H. Maghee sgt The Camden and Amboy Railroad
and Transportation Co-Judgment for the defendants
SUPREME COURT-CmeuII-NOv oo-Be'Ors Justice
MULLEN.
BOOB PUBLISHERS IN COURT.
Peterson agt. Long
The Jury in this case reported in Tuesdays 1RBUSE
rendered sealed verdict yesterday morning for defendant
MARINE CoURr-So7. aI-Before Judge ALKrR
A SUIT FOB HoUsEKERPERs WAGES.
Eunics Clark agt Ephriam II. Jenny
The plaintiff in this case alleges that she was en-
that