The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1866-06-02
Leaot Notices.

| TOHN H. Mccoy vs. MARY. ANN Nc
81 COY LEONARD }. SEELY, Ell AL
IN the Circuit Court for Baltimore countl-in
| Equity.
The object of this suit is to procure decree
for the sale of certain real estate IN BaltImore
county, containing nine acres of land, OF which
John Mccoy died seized and possessed, for di-
vision amongst his heirs atlaw.
| The Bill states that John Mccoy, otherwise
| called John Mickey, was, in his life time, eez-s
ed and possessed Of certain real estate which
is particularly described in the bill and ac-a
companying exhibit that the said John Nc
Coy died some time in the year 1857 or 1865
intestate, leaving John H. Mccoy, Ellen Rose
Ann Mccoy, now the wife of Leonard J. Seely,
Lavina Mccoy and Mary Ann Mccoy, his on
| ly children and heirs at law, and Mary Ann
| Mccoy his widow, surviving him That Ellen
| Rose Ann Mccoy intermarried with said Leon
ard J.iSeely, Of the Statesof New Jersey, after
the death Of said John Mccoy, and that said
Ellen Rose Ann Seely is now living separate
! and apart from her said husband and is now
residing in Baltimore county, and that said
| Leonard j. Seely resides out of the. State of
Maryland; and that it will be for the interest,
benefit and advantage of the said Mary A. Mo-
! Gov, widow, Ellen Rose Ann Seely and Leon
| ard j. Seely, Lavina Mccoy, Mary Ann Nc
| Coy and said John III. Mccoy, to sell said real
4 estate for division amongst them and that the
same is not susceptible Of division or partition
said Ellen Rose Ann Seely, Layinia Mccoy and
| Mary A. Mccoy are infants, under twenty lone
| years of age, and sale thereof cannot be had
thereof without the assistance Of this Court
| The amended bill of the complainant states,s
| by way of amendment to the original bill, that
| the charge therein made that Ellen Rose Ann
Mccoy intermarried with said Leonard j. Sec
| ly, of New Jersey, after the death of John Me-
/ Gov, is a. mistake in fact, and that the truth
and fact are that said Ellen Rose Ann Mccoy
did not marry said Seely but on the contrary,
she has never married any one, but shejis now
and always has been single and unmarried and
an infant under the age of twenty -one years.
That Mary Ann Mccoy, the sister of the COM
plainant, intermarried with the said Leonard
j. Seely, of the State Of New Jersey, some time
in the year 1854, after the death of said John
Mccoy. That said Leonard j. Seely is not
citizen of the State of Maryland, and does not
reside therein, but resides out of the State of
Maryland, and that his wife, the said Mary
Ann Seely, is living separate and apart from
her said husband, Leonard J. Seely, and is now
residing in Baltimore county and State of Ma
ryland, and within the Jurisdiction of this
Court and that said Mary Ann Seely, Lavinia
Mccoy and Ellen Rose Ann Mccoy are infants
under the age of twenty one years. ~ III
1t is thereupon adjudged and ordered that
the complainant by causing copy of this or
der to be published and inserted in some news
paper published in Baltimore county, once in
each OF TOUR successive weeks 4De1ore the Ilth
day of June, 1866 give notice to said absent
defendant, Leonard j. Seely, of the object and
substance of this original and amended bill,
and warn him to appear In this Court, in person
or by solicitor, ( .gza sl
on or before the 18th day Of September, 1866,
to answer the premises and show eauseif any
he has why the relief prayed should not be
granted and a. decree ought not to pass as
prayed. - = = 49, gAsA
JOHN H. LONGNECKER, Clerk.
! True Copy-Test; ~