Shenandoah herald. [volume] (Woodstock, Va.) 1865-1974, 1866-11-29

This last statement. of purchases and pay
ments, amounting to $500 545a, is copy
Of the original account ON file in the Clerks
Office of Shenandoah County rendered by
the administrator of j. Dinges as defend
ant, in the suit of Koontz as. Dinges, in
addition to the other disbursements made
by the concern, between the period Of the
18th of March 1915 and the 25th of Au-
gust 1915, and sustained by the Court be-
cause of the failure upon the part Of Mr..
Koontz to in anywise invalidate it, Il is
now clear from this, that the erideace i'll
my hand show that the disbursements du-
ring that period were greater by 1922 7Cz
than the erhtbit of receipts by Mr. Koontz
Now would have it distinctly under
stood that the.recovery made bytMr. Koontz
at court ,eas secured 10y ii TRIUMPH. Up
ACCOUNT in Mr. Fttzer's time, dating
FROM the 18th, of Janliary 1915 to the
9th of March 1S45 which Mr.. Koontz
originated AFTER he had submitted his
prayer to the Court-he having FAILED
ENTIRELY III the OBJECT of his suit,
which was to recover for PREF ENDED
deficit ). occurring bebften the 18th Of March
1845aand- the 18th of August 1915 x
It has pleased Alr. Koontz III further ex-
preston of the lad temper which has con-
trolled him, to charge that Il abandoned
my first account. and i'll It's lace proposed
another Both statements arefalse, the lat
ter infamously So. The first account
PUBLISHED ly me dated from the 18TH Of
March l845 to the 18th Of August l845,
andrelared only to to that period in which
was Interested Tile first account was
not-only sustained hy the Court, but fur
nishei.o,he evidence which induced the
Court TO disarpoint Mr.. Koontzin the ob-
jecssef his suit notwithstanding these
facts, Mr.. Koontz, i'll reply to my first ar
ticle, .adycrtises to the world in language
of complacent nalignity, that he recover
ed AT COURT verdict. for damages, DU-
RING THAT VERY PERIOD, that
not only .disapproyed my Table of Fig
ures," lat clearly established the propriety
Of his course. The plausitiify of 50 base
fla brication could alone have suggested its
adoption. and the spirit of confirmed hard
lhood alone been reeoaciled to its propriety
by one SO well and fully acquainted with
all the circumstances, as was Mr.. Koohtz.
This. -unmitigated falsehocd,. led me IL. pub
lish his Triumph up account" in Mr..
Fetzer's time, ri ord, r to show WHERE
he obtained his Looaed deficit Stung by
the arrow St conviction hedged y the
barriers Of eliminating dates, Mr.. Koontz
with duplci'y and arti6ce proclaiming
him familiar with the genius of dark de-
signs made .mockery Of truth telling. fig
ures. and sought not only to ronfunui.daie
and periods, but the accounts as wen. in
order to mslead the public verdict
Mr.. Koontz continues: And inasmuch
as the '.urbitrqtors'' disposed of this first
(accounDil shall try and pay my respects
to tile second" A more fragrant violation
of truth, and stronger manifestation Of
mean purpose. could not have been shown,
than Mr.. Koontz has exhibited in the
above. The account to which he refers as
having been sustained by the Committee.
or arbitrator" uas MT altered BY me be-
fore them. Eren If 1t had been, THE INA
BlLTY of'Mr. Koohtz ToINvALIDArE IT BE-
FORE, THE CouRr, would either disprove his
assertion. or show singular completely of
purpose to, my injury. between himself
and the Commute. or ''arbitrator.
And again Mr.. Koontz says: ..He re-
af6rms that there was no deficit as shown