Virginia free press. (Charlestown, Va. [W. Va.]) 1832-1916, 1866-07-26

Where Pacific Guano is used the difference is manifest
not only in the larger growth and ygor OF the plant but
also in the fine healthy color Its effects are Iy pemark
able. "A PRICE.
HAcERsIowx Nd, lyme 18th, 1866.
Mesrs. John s Reese Co., Baltimore. No a.
of wheat used it and several other standard fertilizers
with view to ascertain which was best suited to my soil
an e bat the Pacific is price Considered superior to
any other fertilizer used 10 this section when applied to
Respectfully, JNo. W. SroUFfRR
BKNYEr's PoIxr, near Queenstown, Md
June 18th, le66
Messrs John s. Reese d Co., Baltimore
applied on my wheat crop. follows: On one farm the
first seeding applied three tons at the rate OF two hundred
pounds to the then follow ed with three tons of
applied the uano off faster and better through
the winter and spring. and by far the best wheat
have shall commence cutting It morrow as it has
rpened at least sac days sooner than wheie put the
On my home plantation applied three tons of Phos
phae the first seeding. and followed with the Guano
same and consider it the very best fertilizer have eper
used Thus see have gwen it fair trial. and shall
continue to it as long can have any assurance OF its
am. gents, yours very respectfully
S. 0GLE TnGHMAN.
PRINCESS ANNE. June 10, 1866.
In reply to your request for result of APP
plcation of Pacific Guano purchased OF you have TO
Guano was used is growing finely Notwithstanding the cold
and unav season. outspping that where ashes
Very truly yours, Isaac D. JONES.
DAyyILLE, VA. July 3, 1866.
Messrs. .jno s. Reese d Co., baltimore
We sold good many tons of Pacific Guano
last FALL you know to be used for Uhea and rather
more largely of it this Spring for tobacco.
We have been informed by many Of the parties who
that the effect upon the wheat was equal to that produced
by the application of PeruUian in equal Quantities, and
For the tobacco crop we had to encounter the preudces
existing against and untred fertillzer-but
pleased to say that in instance have those who applied
the Pacific Guano had to regret the experiment.
the contrary it has given universal satisfaction The APP
quantities as the Peruvian and in instances along
side of it, and every application that have heard Of
the effect the tobacco is most encouraging We will
instance remark made by of most enterprsing
planters lie had bought PruUian Guano for his tobacco
and but at our earnest request took two bags of Pacific
The Peruvian and Pacific, were both applied on lot of
average ferty-the Pacific on belt thu ough the middle
of the quantities eQudtand Peruvian each side
the Pacific. visitor after the tobocco had gotten ceH
the best tobacco without knowing how where the differ
en ua9G were 3psd ne at S 6s 70 the SH cont If
There Wi not Be m much difficulty in selling the Pacific
Guano after this season. well is acting aud gener
Very truly yours, GRAsTY & RIsoS.
PIrrsYLvAYIA COUNTY, VA..July 8, 1866
hereby state that bought from Grasty Rison, Dan
applied on land intended for tobacco $50 pounds to
the acre-alongside of the quantity of Peruvian
way and the time; that cannot now any diff
ference in the appearance OF the tobacco all growing on
Pacific as the PeruUidn Gudno. JOSEPH S. LEWIS.
Snow HILL, June Goth. 1866.
Messrs John s. Reese d 90.
fused Pacific Guano, side by side with Peruvian.
on my wheat and take great pleasure in informing you of
the result weighed 81 worth of each and
two breadths ofand exactly equal in size the difference
decidedly favor of the Pacific the plants are at east one
hird
ity am thoroughly convinced that it Is the best and
preference to any other now in the market.
Yours, &c,
Snow HILL, June Goth, 1866
used Pacific Guano. along side of one of the
most popular Phophates now in MARKET and take great
pleasure IN you OF crops produced
less cost than that of the Phosphses The wheat,
where used Pacific started earlier and was therefore bet
Ter prepared to stand the winter applied fully Oyehird
more of the Phosphate than Pacific have been in the
habit of using Peruvian Guano but shall Pacific in u
it is certainly lar ahead Of any Of the Phosphates no,o
double the present price ton for either wheat or
shall continue to use 1t myself and take great
pleasure in recommending it to others
Yours, &c,
ISAAC CoXNoR
Snow HILL. June Dist, 1866
tried Pacific Guano, side by side with Reese's
Manipulated in equal quantities. aEd TO my surprise, the
Paclnc
the habit of using Reeses Manipulated Guano wheat
for years. and considered the best fertilizer in the
market but, my surprise, the wheat where used Pa
cifc is better in quality and greater in quantity. think
the yield will be least onehird greater. have every
confidence in it. and believe is the best fertilizer in
use IL is so well known in my neghborhood that il needs
no recommendation. Yours, &C.,
JYO. j. TMMoYs.
NEwTowN. MD., June 3d. 1866.
Messrs. John S. Reese d Co.
l used Soluble Pacific Gusno on oats this
spring. Ny oats manfred with it are subject Of general
remark and had known its character fully would
have used much of the past Indeed it is
its own best advertiser and any using it will be
sure to use it again.
For myself, am in every way satisfied with it. and ex
meet TO other fertilizer unless perhaps bone
dust for special purposes so long the Pacific Guano
maintains its present character 1t being something new
TO me neglected its this for fertilizer that has
BEEN long and favoraby known but have already found
out my mistake. 1ours' 0c,
S. S. QUINN.
JUNE 9th, 1866.
Messrs John s. Reese d Co.
My preparation for wheat last fall was
3 bus. ESQ lbs) fine bone)