New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-06-01

.u ,n.ms.lves the hhs psoSsctsos ssssss Habit,
.scs the Illinois csnsra Railroad % would have hsd nn
su he'd been brooght against them AMI are also titled ,oiis
hs, ~ "a oil ef bills 4 Iliiug lut there 10 really ID
between the two conFso' B a., esafax
ofte contract ihsr. The isfftn are nc, ~ ~ns -
loo. 10 tie cotton occaone4 by f. aaess fht s "a. tss
the result o. their negligence Now although ~ cefsac.I
have .so. been freed from ,s. . s'S5s y.S Ses. -
borasn Of saii.iyls you That this los. sach - oonf
their part aud they bad omitted that degree care .lss
.sss .rc Of aad,r .ss @:sS
then they a.. not relieved ioS liability BY is..on o. III.
exercise Ordinary care and diligence Which q ooar. ais
combasle character Of Ihs property ard VI Ia. seea M
rounded H. aud they omitted that degree Of care or dh
which persons having tie charge Of such pop an
der such circumstance and beng possessed VI ordinary
donce foresight and care might FessOosoy bs ."
take Of IL .nd n through The want Of hat car. snd dnes
responsible notvstlsnding The estre ion "a us
relied upon establish ns Vie requisite care and eisshe ..
the absence Of hs alter presents question o sef ~
heard X. .Tsnc. and sss alignment. Of the es,nsu
botA sides. and leave entirely TO VOC Yea are
whether there ordinary and deeAce hr 80
rrrvenoa 81 fire. and 20 avert ils copse oehes oecsf
II you should the defendants have not been curry
such nssighnc. or that II they have II cid not cobreas
In any degree to tue los OF the eoston. WEI y
them 81 responsibility for thu. misfortune Bay ,sl
conclude from Of the -ooi that the csehdAn'
hen YOUR next ine ulrv viii OF the los
they liable under Tbs branch Of the ease NOW - -. a.
the % baey hoh arrived SaiUrdss and a. 20 Shh o.
notice or opportunity remove them vas AFFORDED !"
sgnes, bad 90 duty to perform u repec, 70 s-s
bale. md toe defendants under the views - 10 nrghsA
rsss haze g,.s yoa are tn ss. Z. te. wssta
The defe ssaa. are nSois ,his bsnes q tie csc
will depend upon another point 70 which nov ~.
The degree Of care and diligence which have nea'rei
timed until the expiration 81 reasonable une sr,r " "
10 the consgnee- Ct the sva Of the cotton for ne a "
1 from
hsrs whether that tine had 90 BAD rot - i
concerned elapsed when The loss ossrsa
question OF ise Tor yoa The tern reason able s
character u tie property and suen nhs m's'erI lA ~
sion TO the street ). not to D. considered %
the defendants had right deliver there IL 10 s'd
that between the hours VI ana o. IA, ~ % me :, 80
cnd have carted the pier either ith u, a.
- H. d~s~ndsri. had caused BE- irueked Nov 's'
oh, .csliy would have been prs'' anae does 20. 800 "
doe. not the question whether that pei oil tern &
the reasonable which the coJ-snses MAJ - isho,
the tins requisite 70 stow II properly ntate va p
and Il ne hoar Gu Saturday "hen ih' caitnsn t"ii''
which II ss'y do wsrVn" cabie OF @ a
the ihl .heihsI .asy da - Afl $40" ''s
.sl prorrly he to Ken IN and stored hight y q
Chained = stated Was toe cse eee~sss t.sy 90 VOC
v,rs , bound 20 rring s'cI bot eonr rH.oef
Ia. have ben an then time vi sa'sTl.,
when a reasonable pef0 g. sad y have sAfifri y
cous.e # ,he DELAY owing 20 re iat thst tnc ss.l
id no, provide sufficient % s.a5s ware o1ses that 40
nor /. srgeshe 3pon the defadlnt- Noa must com
,e,e ,as no ds.r,nire reaSrsto tine after 1oiiss ~
spd ., :, any Of these - bates aer' N h,- - ssi
Ia iaenor to many % thera o .olt os'. o a.es
wifbn tia, reasonable the ant vl-f' 10y ,,. 80
under the branch u III. would ~ pc ~ 5s'l-i,'
n lad not TO go macy 3a.rt y DH S h."
hd not, the duty ,uh rea.i.a'', SAG 80 -,
iI,lls zen voa eii ato I'D verdict a.'sirs' t,n
fr tie value 81 many al the case Ia ~ q ".
b,.e as - whiea reasonable -ue them had 10. 4
pred Wien tie lcs. occurred 4lr e'i .-li.-y' - ~
Question rcsorshic time con'i'-s % ~ siS :" @
M dow 20 ihs point - time to- JuSn u estsnhsnos -
there vas not any negligence rs Esys Iaisd Ies 10.
rs e nlne for tie Of he whole OF sny pat q o..
- bale. had expired before the lose - -se as 80,
of ne cotton IL the duty u vArch seuen Nhh -
"a rt the deiends s1oal h4ie ,-sfc 80 "Ntr -
prpperty and protection orn - ere and diFf1
hsS - =, .sry prsier,s, v oul asa.y tsAe 81 stss
property lhc only importance tho ,1se 0i iie ss.Lca
Sbssbsr the lass occurred While ne dIi, 81 carr "
tai OF aarehoaseea attached 10 the defendants - ep
,p tb.t wAo IN The former the borden d proc. :
Il ne. sncr rect The ls;en-An IN th' -ti iA'-
de onss under the Of this oop.a8i. o sors "a
sos upon pAinn' and therefore Snssr MT rs -
OF the evidence Of care a1f diernc' ~hc- -
little tie tcf,ndans verdict a. g. the - hae- or st'
Of them Deed nst es - siroos Z, : ~o s i's,g -
vsv that II the Esason'o'e t.ile hsi
the loss defendants took orrFy ar" ~ me 49,
the evidence AL. to satisfy 700 "a. isey asis 81 -
such negligence - poEtors % oiJnafy y l1eLse
wolA nave committed fespt.las nen r''r
o o,sS ss' 's snd The nssaseac. eSstnsuI
los, iaeo. though r.asops5e tue hsf y.
Sles. wiics 1 have thus Prssaiei e ag JMy',
verdict sloaii be agAns, the De- l-esi ;9' 9sn rn-
by he defendant that stPgaiion - ~ CO.. F-e ~ -
the amount thnk that l. not 90 lfat ff"ss'N ~ " ~
an ar ai seftletnent Of lose lid Gl~ oct s'pN -
settlement refused and the part, Is a. 20 h, 81
h. . emitted 90 ordinary % h1hiases "hff
charge yog the yt0c vane OF The 1-f 81 1'e. ioF W
you I'd she de,eGdanis responsible, AZ ,-e ty u Nov
Al the re when cotton should have .+"A deifefe"
snd that may not you y "a rF"pff- VIA
e,tou entirely yoarselves-al1 10 thai value tt'r''
from August lsof bl think she IA aad ehage !a
dednct rom The amount oi The ors t.e hPa' f't
amounting ss5s =. The proof shows LAT eaea Dal '
webf hi value being averaged bv the tcguescene' - l. N
arlhe
M, d.,cn,epts you will mltpy Tat tg The num'e &
bales for which you bold them ans sad add or BOT - go
..- m nterrst rom August le6i, AID d.uci $50
paid freight ard Se balance will b. - ar9aht ~ ~ 90
yol VIII return your verdict
Mr. Marsh SD Mr. Walls i0T pas n NJ saii'-'- 49,
e1 Judge woodfaf lor defendant
United ST TFs CORNERSTONE SOFFiCE-Ms,r..
before Commissi1U ~ u>F0AN.
EXECUTION or PowKEs az ArtOgNEY
The nited States act. j. Nelson Il,Arv .-Cfa-'es
punning seaman on board % the ns4 >;ates .ean'r