New Orleans daily crescent., 1866-02-01
Tlle Courts.

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
James Loveoy vs. Newton Richards, admins
traitor: John Henderson Jr., Durant u Hornor.
- Baker vs.. r, H. Shortt Hunt & Denegre, |
Whitaker & Fellows.
SUPREME COURT.
No cases set for trial in this Court during the
rest of this week.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT.
No cases set for trial in this Court, as a new
Jury is to be sworn in.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
]. Zoelley, agent B. Geheeb and Charles E.
Kells; G. Dufour Hunton Il Harrison.
Succession of Wendln Doll; l.. Castera, Rose
ius & Philips.
F. Glenn
Succession of E. Gerard r. ]. & W. H. Cooley,
G, Jenin.
THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
Tredande Trepe VS.. E. c. Gustenberg; f. War
rem, Sambola & Ducros.
Mr.. and Mrs. Jones vs. Moroney and wife H. H.
Brown. Budd K Lambert.
G. w. Stewart VS.. Mary Caffey; Gernon, Race x
Foster, Browne. Trouble and Egan.
II. Aren't VS.. F. Maher; Emerson e. Grow, E. NJ.
Huntingdon.
D. Simon vs.. l. Bloom and wife; T. L. Lemly, E.
W Huntingdon.
Miss Julie vs. VIM. Roux; j. G. Monteagle, P. S.
Byron.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
| B. Egan, G. S. Lacey.
| Ray & Bresnard vs. same; same attorneys.
A. NJ. Holbrook vs.. City Of New Orleans; A.
George Ingram vs. L. Broom; T. A. Bartlett, e.
W. Huntingdon.
| A. Wellos g. Co. Vs. T. Terrante; A. Robert, E.
| Bermudez.
! FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
Duncan N. Hennen vs.. CarrotOn Railroad Com
| pany Duncan N. Hennen, Rosellus Taylor, Nc
| Connell.
R. King Cutler vs.. Moutz stiewell; r. X. Cutler,
J. G. Fuller Vs. j. G. Chadwick; W. A. Briggs,
| P. Lacroix vs. c. W. Lyle, ct ais !; Budd &
Lambert, Mcdonnell, Hunt Il Dcnegre.
| Louis H. Pile City of New Orleans j. A.
| Rozer, Thos. II. Hewes.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
| J. L. Edwards vs.. C. A. Weed Van Dolson, J.
| Gernon ct al vs. Hebrew Congregation, ct al;
| Roselius g. Philips, Whitaker, Fellows Mills.
| h. G. Simpson Bank of Louisiana Whita-
ker, Fellows & Mills, Miles Taylor.
| Il. W. Dorr vs. same; same attorneys.
Mrs. Massie, wife, etc, Mrs. Damet; Blair,
Hyams & Jonas, Whitaker, Fellows Mills.
A. d. Grief vs.. Kenuttt, Blood u Co.; Durant q
| LIornor, Harrison & Hunton.
l.. Mlaudon vs.. eileen Hunnewell; Roselius
& Dufour. Morgan Field.
| Mrs. l.. Carrere, tutrX, Vs. A. z. valencia Sam
bola Il Ducros, &. e. Schmidt.
| SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
Lynch, executor vs.. s. B. Smith. This is AT
appeal from Judgment rendered in a sui
brought or a written acknowledgment of the
amount claimed as due for services rendered.
general denial fled and the plea of the pres
criptiou of five years interposed on the trial
Judgment was rendered for The amount claimed
aud the de fendent appealed from it. but has mads
| no appearance II this court. Plaintiff filed an an
swer, claiming damages for a frivolous appeal
Ordered therefore that the judgment of The lower
court be affirmed, and s42 damages and costs.
JeaRnott, Quarter & Co. vs.. Succession OF Chas
Hi ct al. Plaintiffs first m0rtgagers caused
certain property belonging to deIendents to bt
sold under eXecutory process, on the 3ist OF Jan
unry, 1862, for the sum of $1,000. which was paic
in full by the purchaser, Louis Gerteis. Afte
paying the claim Of plaintiff, with interest, cost
) and charges, there remained surplus of the pro
ceeds of Sl'52 25.s which the sheriff deposits il
his hands subject to the order Of the Court Thos
Reynolds, second mortgage creditor, took ruiz
l. on Louis Grriels, 10 show cause why he should
moi pay said sur illus, the ground that under tht
It law he was bound t. notice it, and the sheriff wa
\ without authority to receive it on trust in tht
= Court below. Judgment given against Gel
l. jeis, who appealed. 1t is ordered that the judg
ment in favor of Reynolds be amended so Il
| allow him interest. Costs of appeal to be pait
q jointly by the succession If Hill and appellant