New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-01-24
HxxfoAs QUESTION.


g 81, s,sssssn,r
IN ~. . : \ N
The o7I5oiS cofrsspo ndence Oh the Mexican
don rscentls laid befoge The Senate is of some
intefeSt, although il does not appear 70 have any
very Important bearing on the subject. IN met
ill mani purpose Of the discussions which have
shaissfr taken place, appears to ~ 70 avoid an
Tissue. It j. difficult to perceive on What ponss'
Iprsseutsd ~ this ccrrespo there y room
or actuai COLLATION. md just AZ dlfuls " ses IN
what manner the Unions of the Swo gov=
cfnmentz can ~ asr: seNaFc inloslns
wv French through alFs ~ snAs
e United great w
4 and deslfe te tae y s''ll'sy'
which haa hereto sQbsistea peswsen snu WY
countries But, ~ 70 the MeA1can sapile, snas y
I anSfely different tn not the om.eo Stases 90
/ DOT NE which n prouyn &c ! Huys nalyely
I rssponds that ha knows me TINTED. States 90
therl, now are they gong 70 nelp
I II wcsds W that eflects oi course We
FSilnesnenta NJ diplomatic Language cnarac-
the French Ainister's dspatch !; put
neaning simpiy iss thai ne Tinted states
imay Hike 81 dislike what they please: " az go,
FL privilege which France fully admits, and
with the exercise Of which she has no wish to IN
terfefc,
Nh. Seward commences ~ saying that the pres
Ience and operations Ct French army n Mexlco
md its maintenance o. go authority tnere, resnng
i on force and not the free Will ~ me people q
/ Mexico, AZ a cause ut serious consequence 20 VIZ
4 united sss THIS 2 fot 4he opJec.
Iohasof A United States lie agalnst re autnorlsS
II III hxinllian himself The; attempt 90 estaphsn
hig HnthgEity y stated to pc, Tor these
4 allowable and impraeticaDi but Wall Z
j a&mentahie degree Of foTgetfuiness seward onss
i 81 state what :" these reasons ale Mlsss - :
are 70 infer that they are s a'iu
Of the sor1 "a vicloes
circle quite as to tho reader as Y must
Il hare been embar RAISING to AZ Drpnyn de Il
IL Neyerthel ess, after thus broadly 49, VIZ
II Of Maxinaili authorlty " AeAlco
u be both disall PIE and lnpra chca Pig
II Nj. Seward very much mobiles re naturaliy az
4 pected conclusion, by stating fhat ne unltea
II States 6 are not prepared 70 recognize or 70
sIpledge themselves hereafter TO recognize any
political institutions in Mexico which are "a oppo-
aitioh 20 the republican government With which
No Have ~ long and 20 constantly maintained re-
Elatons Of amity snd friendship
that the TINTED states may not, ~ some fu-
" recognize the Mexican l empire, Mr.
III tahes care t1ot m assert They are simply
4 INIT prepared to volunteer such recognition at
i asnt. Ihe reader may remark in this sentence
/ ! rertain ambiguity and inconseq uence, which
amid ftYt HI IL suggest themselves to the mind
III 81 = Il, e q, II q d;nfor af;st
= g ]
oe Z nny sesu atoll
the words used BY Mr.. Seward that ne objects to
nrniyit1o rol;tica institutional onposed to
nv vernbl governments uitl, which & ~ have
NJ ~ NJ
ioig maintained reatlons of amley and TREND
NsIaip n III Id difficult To gather the exact meaning
ty,ia r,hrase brt II appears III mply either that
Statas ON IN &C
ments but republican governments; ors any az
Eth0rities but those with which they have main
Htained long and constant relations Of amity and
| friendship, But as the duty to recognize de
fqcto governments is generally admitted among
civilized nations refusal to comply with that rule
must involve the existence of some fatal defect on
4 the part of the government making claim to recog-
linton. WI, therefore, presume Mr. Seward to mean
/ that Hid monarchical form of governments fatal
defect ii hs eyes, and that the long and constant
friendship of the United States invests even fuga-
cions and purely imaginar authority with pres
egptve title recognition in spite ofany
fdctd successor not possessing that sacramental
4uaff all of which is, of course, very Hog
/ ical, not to say absurd. NJ. Drouyn de l'Huys lis
mot slow to avail himself Of the advantage. thus
/ given to him. He says
Ths American Union should not, it seems to us,
be kept back by the dlilerence ot institutions. for
Was BIZ
EIt is III conformity with their ow i15rincinles IL
IPublc law "a regard the monarchy established ID
eSlco az beng, a. ieasta government de toeto
which has been v the n ~
of the people Of that country and in thus acting
|the Cabinet Of Washington would only be inspired
M = Waen
Brazil as guiding The policy Of The United States
toward Tue younger States Of the american con-
finenfs
|Es As to the presence q The French troops in
sxleo Az intlmates that any difference arising
from tflat circumstance would at once be obviated
Eby recognition Of Maximillan's government.
Shonld the United States recognize the Mexican
empire the French troops could be withdrawn
WHINE reasonable period
| Sth 1855 is much more logical and much
more intelligible than those by which it
/ Was preceded. Bat after reaflina IA the ;nnres.
" 4.
IL atuA ulhlns tudt tne governments OIL the United