New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-03-27
TI,e Courts.
Gases Set for Trial This Dny

SECOND DISTRICT CoUR7.
j. Ne Capaflero and syndic of Egana We Ma
carty-CRveilieT, Bayne Il Taylor. g. Charvet.
G. Rade1ich vs.. succession TaIto-H. NFain.
J. W. Gariey. J. @. A. Bradford.
A. B. C0urcelle vs.. &. w. Montg amery-I L.
Nssot. W. H. Hunt.
Jno. q orcest VS.. A. A"WAiams-W.W W. Haaain.
Geo. 81 Lacy.
G. d. Miller VS.. Schnider e. Baber--E. W. Elm
tington, Durant & Horner.
j. Mcdonald vs. Pat Hayes-W. G. Budd, G.
Dufour.
VIM. Long vs. Adams Express company-E. H.
| Chambers & Drysdale VS.. Berk, Maunsslie s. Go.
Mix Il Rohiason, Bradford Lee d Finney
Llambias- & Dockter VS.. j. Lombard ASamboaa
| & Dueros, j. Lombard. ...
P. H. Degry VS.. NJ. Condr on-J. D. Augustin, J.
Q. A. Fellows.
A. J. BogA VS.. str. Nina simmes ct al-H & j.
Grover, L. NJ. Day.
Margare. James VS.. ]. Moynihan-E. Warren,
Geo. s. Lacey.
E. F. Motion VS.. Mrs. Massar-L. Castesa, Hunta
S. Leare Dupeire vs.. A. NJ. Hernandez--F. Lam
O' FOURTH DISTRICT COURT
John Braush VS.. Condor McNamora-Van
Dalson. Budd.
Michael Eyland VS.. Mrs. Rice-Field shackle-
Phillip Duels vs. Joseph Hayne, ct. als.--A. Der
bes. Saucier & Michinard.
George Ingram VS. F. Broen-T. A. Bartlett
|
M. j. Bujac VS.. Houghton, Rankin & Co.--H. M.
Withersbury l. Applecate vs. William Perry
Sullivan, Beldngs 3 Hughes. j. Brewer. A.,
| James H. Russell vs. DR.. E KennemHn-Man,
Foute & Bradford. ]. Lambert:
/ FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
E. D. White VS.. Pontchartrain Railroad Company
ct alsaC; More Briggs IN! Miohnard: Nar: ou,o.n.
Haynes. T. H. Heres.
Jno. G. Colman VS.. F. Bauer-J. G. Colman p. p.
Is. Hohore vs.. Paul Anglade-Bernos and E.
I'd. Guerin vs.. Thos. Shore-Van Dalson. RI l..
VIM. F. Cooney VS.. Jno. V. Bogert-And Miller.
Whitaker, Fellows u Mills.
sixth DISTRICT COURT.
f. John wible vs.. Gumble-Whttaker, Fellows u
t Mills. Geo. s. Lacy.
8 Jos. Sails vs. Tizovich et als.-Sambola e. Dn-
a eros. Field l. Shackleford.
r F. Minard vs.iH. Ducatel-F. Buisson. C.'MoreL
: A. Mercier VS.. B. D. Harrison--C. Dufoar. J.
e Hornor.
sodini & Riccs vs. VIM. H. Homes ct. .als.-sam
d bola & Ducros. Field u Shackfeford. Whitaker
s Fellows g. Mills
9 SUPREME CoURr-eoNDENsED DECISIONS.
l. The following decisions .wers rendered by th
$ court yesterday:
II ander. Appeal from Third District Court Of Ne'
J. Orleans. Decreed that the judgment OF the lowe
lcourt be annulled and reversed, and, proceea1in
d to give such judgment as should have been rer
3, dered by said court, it is further deereea TN
the Injunction in this case, sued out by the defer
4 dant be dissolved at the costs OF defendant, an
e, that the order of seizure and sale obtained b
the plaintiff be proceeded with according to iaV
y and that all the costs incurred in the court belo
and in this case, be paid by the defendant an
Or appellant. Whitaker, Fellows and Mills for a.
lie peilant, G. Roseus and Alfd. Phi lips for appelle
le B. L. Millandon vs. Abner N. Ogden. appellan
he Appeal by defendant from the District Court Of Il
ne Second judicial District. Judgment OF the low
er court affirmed, with damages and costs in bo
ty courts. P. A. Ducross for appellee, Kennedy
ey Miles for appellant.
al Appeal from Sixth District Court of New orlear
ry Judgment affirmed with damages and costs
appeal Fellows & Mills for appellant, Durant
OF Horner for appellee. =,
ed pellants appeal from Fourth District Court Of N!
| : Orleans. Motion to dismiss overruled. Fon
'll, Helme Il Brikell for appellants, Lee Man
lis appellee n wo+o,,,
of Appeal from Third District Court Of New Orlea
int Judgment affirmed with costs. Whitaker,
. lows a. Mills for appellant, G. Roselius ssad
of Phillips for appellee.
for Francois Lacroix, agent, appellant, vs. F.
of Cooler. Appeal from Third District Gornsot y
for District Court upon it set aside and aanuled.
mi decreed that defendant, Coeler, pay plaiatif
sum of six thousand five hundred dollars rent, '
,er- interest-that plaintiff have apriyilege on the
perty seized professionally defendant
dos costs in both courts. The right of plaintiff to r
fey not comprised in this decree, is reserved
was Joseph Stanford Bossier vs.. G., R. Carral
sheriff. and Wm. E. Kennedy, appellants. Ap
;ey from District Court Of Sixth Judicial Districs.
ith, ton to dismiss overruled Alfred Henaan
am, appellants. -. ..gLs ,sc
am, Francisco Perver vs.. Bernardo Capella. ar
liant. Appeal from the SecIhd District Cour
ant New Orleans. Judgment appealed from affirl
5. defendant paying costs in bota courts. g. Sch
E. for appellee, G.. Redmoad, E. Hunt and MI
was verri fer appellant.
A. w. Walkerappellant vs. J. s. Cucn!u.
sky, peal from the Fourth District Court of New
and leans Judgment affirmed with costs Hu1
nam, Miller and Roseus for appellant, p. Soule, Z
ham, |syet, Bonford and beatty for appellee. u. J
Polhamus & jackson vs.. The City OF NeM ~
ssist- leans, appellant. Appeal from second LIS
a. Court of New Orleans. Judgment amrmea mr.
z and costs. Geo. 8. Lacey Tor appehee' Anoin''
"A Thomas H Murphy vs. Samuel and L. Fasns
was appellant Judgment affirmed, with damages
costs of appeal Durant u Hornor Tor app
| 4, mid fnr