The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1866-04-06

TIRE and afiarss the proper slS6,on of The prodao
s United eight
&.
s moi ssy oe
the four dollars or 80 much thereof as
Cor fixtures stationery and advertising for rent Of store
T5sass AK n. ;s
resolution approved the 18th Of January 1864 and con
hundred dollars much thereof be found neces
soSr So e * en- sss xs
from hayre Paris going and retarnng for labor in the
month and %sa,hs for
ss o & onsy ,' and
Snsens ihe Of thrsyass i5Sassnd seven
ss found for The sGavsns 81 81
y The BY and with the advice and consent Of the
the s SsPs
point additional no. exceeding twenty in num-
SIC That the Governors Of the several States be and
nys 'ss
Of the h.ndTSrs q our artisans and The prolific sources or
saeh further as may be necessary to dase
Respective States the advantages which Il promises
NATIONAL TELEGRAPH COMPANY
Mr. sIEnNAS rep Of Ohio introduced a bin to incor
ferred to select committee Of Ave. and is as follows
Tss. George ssnts, George
Edwin Cram BENJAMIN e smith Robert saures s.
s sfss &c s e sd s
md 1sssa
Mat are or that may hereafter be established within the
That The capital Of the said company shall not
s 81 ben S and such
hons a. It's bylaws may prescribe .
may use the lines Of said company at such
under such regulations the Postmaster General from
SEC That Congress may any time alter amend this
SENATOR Yoor's SUCCESSOR
Mr.. POLAND Tep) of ", presented the credentials OF
George f. Edmunds, Of Vermont appointed TO I'll the
vacancy occasioned by the death of Mr. Foot
The oath of Office was administered TO Mr. Edmunds,
and he took his Senator.
PETITIONS SOUTHERN
STATES, Ec.
Petitions presented against the admission OF the
asey rebeous states without adequate security asking
for an equalization OF bountes asking Congress TO enact
an eight hour labor law and for increase Of pensions
They were appropriately referred.
DEFENCE OF IHE PEOPLE DAKOTA.
The bill to provide for the defence Of the people
the Secretary OF War to furnish one thousand stand Of
small arms, and hundred thousand rounds Of
munton, TO the people OF Dakota to enable them TO
repel Indian invasions.
coIcRED soLDRRa
Mr. wnsoS (repl Of Mass, reportea the joint resou-
II provides that the ssion in the rolls Of the
words "free before April 49, 1s6i shall de-
pnve any colored solder bount TO VIII ch he is
entitled and which is now or may hereafter be with
bold by reason Of such omssion that nothing
neren contained shall DO 80 construed as TO entitie
soldiers who we're not free At The daio herein specified
70 receive bounty.
kr WILSON offered an amendment to the effect tina, in
1eerninnR who ID the wife Of coiored soldier evil
Asncs Of cohabitaton and living together shall be taken
~ proof
TINS
Tho veto message was then taken up.
Mr. Johnson, dem Of Nd. said that in the discussion
q Tho hill before tho Senate the question strictly
loyal one. There questions Of policy to be consid
cred questions Of expediency The objection which tho
President makes 10 the BILL In returning 1t without liz
appreciation, relates well TO the expectancy OF the
measure TO its alleged upconst tuionalhy The pur-
poses OF clothing the Pread the power
any other, TO guard the States ainst ike influence
and to guard the individual citizen also In addition t
these Objects Of the purposes Of the convention
70 guard against inexpedient and Ill considered legsa
ton Looking to what had taken place the Congress
ofnhe conederaey and TO what had occurred In the
era State governments the members Of the convention
Of 1857 satisfied that II just
sary for the public veal to protect the county against
inexpedient legislation, almost necessary Il
70 protect against unconstitutional legislation II has
heretofore been denied by and doubted by others
whether the resident Justified using the power
cept upon constitutional grounds. That principle
argued by the leading members OF the whg party at the
head OF VIII oh stood Mr. clay, when they became very
much dissatisfied With the rci-e Of that power by the
then Presd Mt Of the United States, General Jackson
The fact then attracted attention OF Mr. Madison.
He expressed his opinion IL In Litter written with the
ability which always marked his writings, dated
GU the 18th OF October, 1894 Mr. johnson here
The honorable member from Illinois tMr. Trumbul)
seems to suppose that he finds valid objections
this instance in the fact that the bill passed received
the votes OF more than twothrds Of the members OF
each house. and he cited In support OF that doctrine
speech delivered by the President when he a
Der Of this body In 1859 and 1890 The Senate perhaps
were induced by what he read from that speech 10 be
keve that the President stated the principle be that
. bill passed by twethirds vote could not consttu
tonally be subjected to the veto power be had read
the latter part OF the ntence he would have found
that the President intended " such thing The sound
ssss Of the doctrine expressed In that speech cannot be
Mr. JSsIson when EN- he was Ms sn,s5 q
By the majority necessary for the purpose o. over
ruling . veto was rcason why he should very eau.
hs being In The Judgment OF the Senate, Il certainly
was not IN the mind Of MI johnson at the time, that
power. the honorable memIer (Mr frumtulD an.
tvcr question which put 10 him shows that, in the
Judgment Of the senate tho veto power was properly
exercised and bill which In that instance had been
passed by than thirds OF both houses did not
become law, as many who bad voted for the bill
Ssns's veto message Now Mr. President in order 70
exactly whether was proper for the President 20
ssapprove Of this bill becomes essary 70 ascern
with precision what the bill is Mr.. Trumbull insisted
upon IL that there section in which " not clearly
constitutional He maintains the consttutonality %
II rs merely declsraiory q what Law Is, and
secured By that, " II was not declaratOry was
law whnen :, ,n m s ~ 20 s,s -
declare who shall be citizens Of the United states The
honorable member referred 70 case repored In The
9Th Peters, the decision Of Chief Justice Marshal, Tor
abe purpose Of showing that a citizen Of the United
States who had been naturazed and Who resided any
state Of the United States had a right 10 80 into the
courts OF the United states The honorable member
clearly az think misapprehends the decision 10 which
be reiers The question fore the was, whether
appeared upon the face the pleading that the party
going into the court below had right N 20 into hat
under the constitution OF the Uniied states and the
oct lTsp which passed 10 carry out s prov s0ns
The jurisdiction OF Of the United states where
was made dtpend upon the character Of party
siyen only In where the party plaintiff and the
party defc cxens of different States And the
question before the court whether II appeared
on the face Of the declaration IN this particular
case the party pantn citizen q state sud
o. such entltled 20 70 into the courts o. The tntd
stats The language % the declaration that he
was naturalized citizen OF The United states residing
m tho state og Louisapa, and the Court 10 the
conclusion that that avernent equivalent
u1eni that be- citizen Of Lcusaua. In the absence