, 1866-02-28
law INTERFERENCE,
The Nicholson Case Still on Tri ,l...
Verdict Against the Alton Railroad
Company for Etecdns 4 Pas.
seager from 4 Tratn-.-Au.
other Suit Commenced
Against the Same
Company.
SENTENCE DAY.

N8MpA0ys
SENTENCE DAY.
PrtaoneFn Sentenced in tho Recorderss
Cours-An Array Or ,Crimlnals-
2Fame in ali Phames-New
Suits and Judgments.
tfr7ED STATES CorHr-Beforx Hon. 7aomss
D77'1aoad, Jthdoe-Wtfly -. Truman ct al. Cnnse
set down for hearing on pleadng1 and psoois being
heard.
Samuel Nicholson vs The City Of Chicago. Ar-
tlon 10 1ecoyrr daaazes fr m alleged infringement
hy the defendant o. the complainant IN the called
SUPERIOR corar:-Bgert ian. JON Il. W4sos.
Ehi5 Jnsfac<, Gnd Hox4. .fose1M E. Gm-r aaI Jntn
A. JDissoH. Afsocfdte Judies9-This Court win not
FnE vs. Kiseana. An Important decision VIA
made IN this Coun The other day, By Judge Gary,
upon question arising in an action Of ejectment
D. F,sk Is. Patrick El.saoe and involved tho tt.e
to honae and lot occupied by ktsAsnc, in the
Tbc phfn,,a i 10 IS Prove hs title, offered the record
oflbe paten, from 1ne United States to the otisiaa
E1autees Of the section.
counsel On he ground that sn e1cmpliaod oopJ
from the Land oh5ce \. Washington, wa next 10
the patent HeeE, the best evidence ofthe grant:
ia vss eSp{ ~ aest a1deace 81 hei o:
The plaintiff Offered seconalr, A. part ot chain
aeo1a eopy Of dssd o ,de e By ons hsas a
md wife. teonnecttne the plaintiff With ~ THIS
s q eee s.o,s et as
grnutor and bis wife were really The persona who
saa + !, shose 10 nsme .ee acknowledgment
His Honor. Judge Gary, .nled that The ackpowl.
edeezneut Was latally defective, and excluding the
record. 1hs Judge remarked thst the otaes9 Who
hASE %n$
~,!h most remarkable talcnt for btunderinG.
9he paiusif the1runon started to give proof Of
tbisd claim Of title, and a constituting X offered
t,on nsde isG9 by defendant 10 enc Robert 1tae,
togethe1 Vtih : deed from lae tn the piaintf
+; 1eeo M G nsi sns "a 70 se Was o.
,o chow thst k1tsane, the defendant. Lad executed
tho deed IN question
pcntnE With such proofs, and as making the record
copy evidence Of tie original upon affidavit Of ia
lots, &c, which wns done m this casc Il
pir 70 the act Of 1861, proof Of rhe execution Q!
The original hy the party owning the land was 6.
tcutisL independently Of the record; Thai Of thst
the ad OF 1s61- It Nas only evidence OF the con-
tcnts o! tic original decd, when the existence Of
such original had besn proved. and its loss OF ah-
:eucc satisfactorily accounted for. In other word1
IT. wAs IaHdt es1denct Of VIA, was iu the lost deed
when The parry had given cgal evidence that sneh
deed had Once esisied, the whole burden Of
/ AFAA
by any psrsnntpIion- a. 70 the argument thst the
magistrates certificate ol acknowledgement was
proof ot The deed The ans hes was That Tie certificate
ttclf exhibited tn Court. would prove Itself: hut
| lh,t copy could not. The Court wpu}d :ake iudi.
cial notice Of the certificate ikc but ii could moi Of.
IDEALLY oetetn1oe from eeeing copy that The sgna'
These Stexs were sustained by Judge Car, who
excluded The evidence End Judgment wAe given in
,ss9t % Of aStsassP The ns,n bse takea n sp-
pteme t6uff upon question Of Erch Importance 10
The owners and hoideEs Of Lands under the new Ke.
Neg Suits-Hcrzog ~. Ash: 4 petihon VAS Gled
hy IsIaiz nerzog asatnst Michse1 Ash. setting
forth hat the plaintiff L justly indehsed to CON,
dire supplied; that be has conycred ht. properly
19to mtner. With Which he intends TO depart from
,ls sisis A and paytnE ioT w1tt Of ne x to istue
The juzstdiettoa of shecourt. The wit ,etned.
Eeste1dcn II; Granger: An acton Of debt IN
soans Sn'n dset VI. laid a. and st ke
against Ehhn Gzapeer. Beyond The pree;pe fol
sumDont and bonds for eosts no papers were died.
q Carlton DEaske. Appeal u DESCENDANT ION =
Judgment recovered before Justice Brown On he
sMh q The present month.
instituted by Ei}ah smith against Edward II.
the grs<;pt toE summon. no papers wefe tlrd:
tsspss. 10 the pelsoa eomnenesd I B. 1S'iHn Wis ~
cortst,s aeains. Ghtllea Lansing 70 recover dsn-
NAt
forth that On the l9sh Of Fehtnasy, leA the de.
leoa1n,, w1th iofee and smr. a.s.r1ted him VIII
Cub md violently bat sad abuted htn; that dur:
10 ne s1ould and oez. and kicked him IN / severe
and highly demoostIatve manner, rendering him
s1eS. eore and disabled, and uhable to pu1zue his
ClneE5 coqR7-1a5ore Hon. E: s W7uiams.
coMt dled and epprosed. and Fs.s discharged.
Chicago 4 Rock 1shnd Railroad Company ~.
unknown herf Ct George Brunef and Anton VII
be-: Pe.,nsn e condemn; Report q conmi.-
sena. s1'e '''nf "eo q 10 AZ '0e defendants BY con-
San'e ~. Dgny e al heirs Of D. Emho1n. Pc.
6tloo 70 condemn lind for use. etc. Repor Of
SINE =; John IqDn: Petition: Report Of
same v. Ripley. Petition 10 condemn. Report
OF Commissioners confirmed.
Same - Nathaniel ". Howell. PentIon Re
| port OF Commissioners confirmed,
Rogers ct a, ". Moore ct IL Death Of Robert
Jefferson suggested By platr1iG D:sih II Js,nes
1 Moore suggested BY defendant
In The mlttsr OF The petition OF Dinner, executo-
TO conrey real estAfea, ete-chance1y. Cause hard
| and ordered that executor make deed cc1ycy,nR
prayer Of The petition.
| Roberts IT. Chicago t Alton Railroad Company.
Verdict for plalrliG aud damages astessed Al t{5p
/ Motion BY defendant for new trial
| Van Buekirk ct IL ". Mulytl. Verdict for main.
/ III. Damages asse<seed at $5O0. Motion by d.
Rooeus Ct a. ". Moore E, al. vsrdlc, tor p1s.n.
| rit. Damages Aseeased at &l1Td. Notlqu by de-
:epdaut tor ne~ trial. =
Van Afn u, Lyman: Appeal tubml.ted to court
jury being natved. P1nu1nc ior plaintiff and dam.
aeer assessed At $12.
Dscky " Lyman. Appeal auhuttted TO court, 4
lut9 ts!He wslycd. Finding for plaintiff. Damages
a>ssfteo a ~ and Judgment on nud!ng:
=, pa [s,ss;a. = ~ n. "esfSfnsS5 ct IL Usmissed
| nj patauuF Got1s-
.iansE1 iAan9seEI1 ~. Htneicf. hue on defendant to Me
rnd tsn.e 9onG n ne e. eu o. ~ os Monday ne7t
i lCuGNAA C14&E-