New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-11-01

,cner he respectfully denied te jurisdiction OF the site
murFate and decih 70 polnce tho hody OF The recruit ~
iut u nppoaring ground the application was te
mental inb entity OF the recruit the Court uluS 20 ee w.
the mai OF lbs sny in this pro eeing ana femandcd Nm
nIn 4 Graz for prfition'r Il Phelps for respondent
Gen BHeghcd advantage Of his enforced presence on
this proceeding take the oath Of ohc' On ms iecsu' po
motion.
THE MILWAUKEE AND MINNIE OLA RAILROAD cohrASY
TRoUrLi s--sTooEBoipErs VS. plhrcrors
Within !: Crihth & Ihonas sou g A.
hatnc plrthasci their railroad u1icf me orccse OF the
- tro ag9 Mvslse. ns m Z, ' ,saSi 1S,Tac n
foreclosure entered against them Oa December - ls5a The
dcfedas Z Ihonso1 and s9n s seQ, PT2@G sa, 20
o. laS sGI2nJ 10. ' u s T of me ee per cf aSd
a a bonds ani ladgca against he Milwaukee ond
s. riul Railroad Company auonniing 20 over go WIN
IL given to ticm 5O05 shars o. the company already issued
10 be 50 arranged th1 Scoit ead Ih9mson e3ill VOC
10000 10 be paid them bones NJ liolnts transfer Of loo
shnfcs them % BE- made are o. stock IN ano1 20 O.
10 be effected the gnatJu o. five directors and e anomf
meat Of scott and Thomson and three o. hsi, nor's n
transfer them Of 90 laIcs heie iici- expu no 70
Green the ira! validity n 'hc ts1rou tig 10 b. at
!bsr{ locaIioy e9gas NJ q Sot ~. - ,fi 1ig,
should think rrJp aud hhy 'hc gc cs ma ger and
to Of ne Executive Conm,t,- cranl'oa ana Ig,a me
piiutf Is the owner " sH aieos 81 s.. Comp't siocA
OF Minnesotl 'foebdding auv oTecT % c. Yortlon
be interested N any contract or - - 80 q,
one. uIa ,Lc ~, & .- . i -, 49, NJ ~ Drcet-,
met IN philadelphia Without notifying The 0'her yr nnd pro
l, p y,s5eJ opd sott ar Toms5n their nominees
appointed IN their place that tlo money was then
vanccd aud the notes aEd securities ilarTcd ~ eonp
eo9 SiI that Sy bsac ih so has o6aei :. an dou
bonus Go shares Of stock and thTl interest 80 eiha'
elevator owned BY rroid The plud Alleges that these
transfers were oil made after ana Thomson Direc.
that under this arrangement no Brd OF brectos
merely nominal and all the interests Of We road are Ha,e
subordinate those Of scott and Thomson; that AlexlndeS and
the legal advisers OF Scott ADD Thomson and were
Green money for the company and vcre not stock
holders whoa ecciet' that Bg.naim, aho!aeF OF q:
assigned ~ attrnpf ~ thc - PAU company
pahy ind iAat Fey their liecs 90 do co. b. scott md
Thomson have catered into Gcsoi-l0as Ht the ~ Wsee
S,;,cso, sso.tiv Il, no c6rsr 81 vi I'D h his
become iu'e,s. Scott asd Thomson tJune w1 iLc -
PFv Company irrgd q ae creditors o. the oilr oniaay
Alexander and Green being p4fis,. y ssd Heg.lil9n 4l
scot, and GncH, uIl1ify % tc Us '-. ,'D'' ai'
Tat N ufiAcldnce Of iA4Aoe'-t- ~ tpHo.' . -
rel agent and miaaSe- o. tAf IyT4-k,e nLi - fat
pos,4 N D,rf9s N NE Company rfes- 20 Tfr action
that Scott aui ctler' cfn h' night IN dipo Of % iTt,i
the property the oId aIl enforce ih paym of tbs
The yaiag therefore s. that TIE defendants surrender te
noos securities and s.0cs ilAi iho agreement D. declared
void that che defendants b. festrafeI NON iiaae.as o.
parting win any Of We loll' no,r on 'seA o, uS &
Seat II N. S. Paul Ri5ad mi sa Receiver ana uiprI
Ni'Fsaier iiemine mako aal1art b. irnl Of wh,
stated in The complaint ana ilf'Ar 49, at ie ~
rp.il si0lk OF .lc Ml1roi Company, iHa tHt y't 1l!
a9d ~ sf.t ,siiled D i,' l,'i.F ., - ~. ". .,,
Tlose 10 t,ce M enlargement o t's ghoa hryoll le
control Of tho hoa. give % 90 ttc ~ faul hr'.d
Company That scott d. i9',ini o. t' 81 '- y III,
tLog rollins stock for - pes ct %. f eiA4f nIel .. ii
Ieel hed lg.n p! .as P5 eeil :, .ls 81 i-t gs
rrevcn; its being made be hdie 0m ih Executive Com
On ibis complaint and AFFIDAVIT NJ Justice Su,isI.i1d
granted order temporarily eai1inlE 10 crienilh tul a
show y the iulunCon siold not d. continued These
liiei aldA,!s go oi s'ae" -l Mee l-.y a4 'iir' y
Ihe saiayis rcra on The part Of he defendants
ForrIny Tb;v do1y thai he traa.aeo1, Irers rado
after Scott Thomson Dad become directors They ave.
thai the Company whca they advanced lis money a ON
pccariary condition by N an Ilemac hat Grhith and
feune took an active iat m aI cement and ncluiescd
IN IT, aud approve y both before ard afo 81 lad gone
into effect hat e rolling stock AID part OF The road bad nm
down and became Bcc,sIy tor Ih0 20 advance tJloO
for ranang expenses that is receipts uere not paying cS
pens and that iis STOCK aa ir aoIsge Dqn4s we're ue
eHpe< themselves wiling TO surreader the whole securities
Tree oeoeELavinc arrived before e reading Of Tie aida
wits concluded Inc case was ndouned 10 TO-DAY n -
eOck
DECISIONS.
Mary Livingston agt Chas T. Cromwell Motion 70 compel
reply epanted III b. Clain ct al ag Leopold Lonene.a.
Motion denied Anne Whitney agt William Whitney-leport
Of Referee confirmed and judgment OF divorce granted Thomas
Gg Chapman-otOn granted judgment 10 stand rs secur
M Trial fee and costs Of motion TO be paid By defendant
SUPERIOR C0URT-SrRGAL TERM-oCr. 81. Before jus
ticc ROBERTSON
DECISIONS.
Edwin Walsh agt. Chas. A. Gregory.-Motion
granted. -
Chas. Il. WetmOre agt VIM EtmOre.-Motion granted
Before Justice JONRs. d.
John T. Brown agt Amelia L. Glnea-Motion granted and
cause referred &c
Frank Knapp ag Philip LouleJudgmen set aside and de-
PENDANT allowed 70 answer
cnIrpr or COMMON pI EAS cuAMnrns- OoInlar IL