New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-03-09
Ollie Courts.
Cases Set for Trial This Day
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT oouRr

NE -- 85
7 uNIrRD STATES CIRCUIT couRF.
s.s eg RULES. N4st -fs-lE
F. B. Bigelow VS.. E. W. Burbapk-Brght.
i VIM; Lorensen VS.. R. W. Davis---G. Schmidt,
Bartlette.
United States VS.. steamer T. D. Hine-U. s. At
torney. Torrey.
United States vs.. steamer Texas--U. s. Attor-
Henry j. Sorrell vs. j. M. Learset al.-Durant
d Hornor. Morgan. 4E -es
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 4sy
s.FU. s.. VS.. Capt. Mclaughlin, master Of the
steamer Cassandra-A. Miller Robinson.
U. s. vs.. property of A. Reichard-District At
torney. Roselius.
sS CRIMINAL couRr.
The State ys. Charles A. Duffy-Mann and Liv-
se9i f5gs SECOND DISTRICT COURT. rj4fj t0
Shift VS. Shift Clarke & Bayne. H. NJ. Spofford,
Citizens Bank VS.. Succession hugely Clarke 8
Bayne Dnrant Hornor.
Succession George Harbold-Rost. Fuller
Succession Sarah Luckett-Howard. Bemiss.
OPPOSITION
Succession Louis Falc-Planchard. Fuselier.
Tissot.
Succession NJ. N. Reynolds Tissot Roselius &
Phillips. Lambert. j -.
Succession David Barbour-Roselius & Phillips.
Elmore g. King, Bright.
THIRD DISTRICT COURT. ,@
Sturzenegger & Co. vs.. Bark Honduras, ct al
Shannon. Huntington.
j. Baer VS.. j Kopfer--SheIdon g. Pardee. Flu
seller, Belden, Moret IN i t,- --
Heirs of Miller VS.. Hennessy-P blanchard. Oliver.
Il .i,s# E4cEpr1or :.
Cass Bowling vs.. E. l.. owen-Emerson &
Grow. &e8 t5i aessfg
]. Q. Kaufman VS.. Mrs. Murray-schmidt. Mix
Mr.. ana Mrs. McCully VS.. Miller and wife-nIix
& Robinson. blanchard.
a. Garcia VS.. VIM. Piper-Crane. Field &
ShackIeford. " St.sr l4t 80
James Bertrand VS.. Burriss and wife-J. D, An
P. Collens vs.. Clark and wife, ct ais. Mix.
Lemley.
Widow MENDOZA vs.. A. valtazar = noblock.
SambOla & Ducros. @ 555 sstt-. .
F. G. Mahon, agent, Va. R. Tramontana- Hand
lin. j. L. Tissot. re-
T.. j. Walton vs.. Julia Arbuckle-A. Phillips
Patrick Kennedy vs.. e. Kennedy and wife
Coleman, Lemley, Train. Race, Foster E. 7.
Merrick. se
j. Yetter VS.. M. Lister-Plaintif. sambola &
Jane Williams vs.. wyman and wife Morel
Breaux.
NJ. ". Murphy vs.. Cohen y Jacobs Mix 4 Rob-
Mcclure 3 Jonte vs.. w 81. Chambers. D. Au-
gustin. Coleman, Molloy. .y.
q. A. Yorke VS.. W. L. Cozzens Craig. Saucier.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
gsS5 &s&l E$S@ aNH EXCEPTION s@ .Ss
r. E. Allen VS.. G. 7. Hayes ct al.-Elmore 4
King. Egan.s hid d. sd g
H. H. Armstrong Madison Railway Company
US. Il R. Il. Neal VS.. G. Witham and steamboat
Pauline. 4.l-t gA
y VI
Widow elliot VS.. Jean Menard-Robert, Bermu-
dez. Dufour, Laresche q Sheriff.
Sol. Weiner vs.. steamboat Mollie Able and own
ers-Phillips & Leoyy. Hunt & Denegre.
Green & Elder vs.. V. Soniat ct als.-Elmore &
John B. Cunningham VS.. Cohen & Kelly-How.
ard. AID. Rozier.
]. G. Van Wrinkle VS.. Payne Huntington & Co.
Collens. Harrison & Hunton. 1890, lsas5
Wolf Pretts VS.. National Marine Fire Insurance
Company Cohen. Atocha & Howe.
J. w. Robb vs. Waddy, Thompson q Co.-Ran-
sdolph, Singleton & Hardie. Hyams & Jonas.
s6a FIFTH DISTRICT COURT. tgf
.5cs we 3YF5l 5st RULES. - y s-
stanberg & Co. VS.. A. F. Dunbar-Brown. Hol.
land, Baer.
Burke ct ais. vs. city of New Orleans-Haynes.
Hewes. Arf %s#
Mrs. sharkey vs.. her husband Buchanan &
Gilmore.
Broadhead vs.. Guild-Whitaker, Fellows g.
Mills. Derbes, Earhart G7
Z G. A. Parker VS.. H. NJ Weber-W Whitaker, Eel
lows & Mills. Earhart Defbes
p. II. Mousseaux VS.. Edward Thebens ct al
Collins. Whitaker, Fellows q Mills. t3@3
Richard Humble vs.. Thos. Fl. Ricks-Belden &
Fuseiier. MeCay. 20 ,aT ia
Fanny Ada Sparks vs.. Augustin A. Folks, her
husband-W Whitaker, Fellows.& Mills. Hynes q
Gordon. "a s f.s ia9
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT. e.,
9isf r u jt5li, RULES. iTa
Widow &. A. vogel VS.. A. Reichard ct al-Du-
four, Bradford, Lea.
a. B. James vs. Fellows & Co.-New. Bemiss.
tle sa CASES. ~ a!af
Ed. Leche VS.. P. Rlyiere ct al-Cutler. Sau-
tcier. 87f iiyt ss sgs5 8Esftls a. r.
Charbonnet vs.. j. A. Wagner-Dufour. How
ard, Clarke 4 Bayne. lts
Courtade VS.. staigner--Heistand. Castera &
Dufour. s5 isls n. .asza
9. Desjoie VS.. David Wilson, ambray & Magne.
Coleman. t. WI es fS lrt sE5eT ~
Jacob Barker vs.. C. L. Chase-Plaintiff Lacey.
Maria Morris VS.. G. Guth-Belden & Fuselier.
1. Lanier vs.. Clark Morgan B New. a. B.
Long. ''5-
The Exclusion of the Southern Represen-