, 1866-05-09

crime Ia ,he individual those who weee fn!l1
pa1doned did not come within the operation o. inc
mi a1. ef.sit BL1iSE understood The gentleman from
Pennsylvania to say that those who CANE Mltan lhe
b considered = having volnntani, adhered to the
~ 81. STEyRSs ss.in,.sed their condition to
,hat Of pcrson CONVICTED Of felony, and thereby
rtudcred Incompetent 10 tefty. out Nho, II pr
piedaee pD III bis psrdon, nsreey Showing hs sonps.
Mi 81. BLAINE tusessted that II tha. was the pro.
per construction 10 be 0lyeu the rectlnu 1t should
e 10 amended, that there could be no question
about its eocttsuc ion. apd be should, II tho pro-
The point n1ade b. III. Blame, md v1tuauy I'd,
mttted by NJ stcrens 10 he well taken. seemed 10
s ae Id 1t s, Il e. e &c sssss;
Nth great Interest. "a If recognizing the posanlJ
ea.s. character Of the objection.
/ III. FlNcK. Of Ohio. spoke IN opposition to
M1. STEVENS explained that whereas. pardon !,
Cathsd s5 ont crime md tts punishment M !aere va
q sa1satsse .ksn relisi trom paai.hneni:
thc only p1oposftios IN ihe amendment moi bot- |
who lid participated in rctellion Nefe unft % be
allowed 10 vote on the 1st OF Jauu-
a saiar Ssss III szs, y =. no = :oesp. ,s 1ee
.s.ass e u Pss;a P5ss|SsnI slsS
\ -
fanr @ yeats, how Va hat to be carried oatI Only
ii every po IL eiesen States in .he un,on. He did
not think H. therefore, wise or prudent. both for
ss n Bsn he sa eseon
: should f,aud az pau Of the amendment, and be
should move 10 amend BY striking out the th,sd
The SPEAKER stated th,t the pending motion Of
! reseusattmens could be offered
=, Nr. GARFIELD would then more to amend tho
s'1se on1 ,Ss ,h,lS sesaoR gssasd ezp,ainsd ,Ast
!. iianehsemepi: bnt that il sas moro Jast thana
Temporary Acknowledgment. He commented upon
fnst ,s1tl &c fepGS G1on 9 f people of
VINCE W s's tS s lie had
. only called tie people Of the South 10 rally round
9 Nj. GARFIELD sonld Leave the House TO judge
2 how much difference there vas hstween ihc Two
North TO tisnd together viii all their manhood.
= uud to rcstst the revolutionary symptoms among
nc people oi tie sos.b. anu their eo''jutofs In
b. liz. FINE declared tha: there wa. but one dts
;. union party In lhe country, and his colleague
u NJ. TuaiEIi addressed The Housc. VITA one
ssesp,on he sas psnsed se1 I auT deIissFs6iGn a %
y proposed amendment. Thai exception W. the
~ ~ third eee'ion. &c AGED with the sentiments
KEts{ x ". :.d ,ss & in vor
20 chl.ns eyerY tnor In te land, Nhelher "hf,e oi
t9 black. but he did MT believe the gentleman could
nd Sir. SMITH raid hc had :cen many coioted men
r. prisuuess Of taken with aE1ns in their hand.
WHO alu'fcd that thcy had 5ofnca toc feoes soi
e ". Kelley tafd he would require stronger evi
us dtnce against co1ored man charged with treason
Than he We Id asa1n.t Lee or any other leader
y. the con:!isssts e, army; ~. ,.,,,o,
u IN me sense that the ceven States ont Of til
Union. lie did not snh:csihe 10 the doclrlne 0
her being reduced to the colinon & territories
az thr1eh lhtm and tuh1tCt them to 0bedltnc
ea prcc,teis on the san,s principle ,a o. which b,
sse ater puniznlns ,hem in thas Way, they had =
w. right 10 pus that child In cos.cr nad kesp biz
in ss ess sssa9s Sn' hsc n Il
eEe s!ood The CONGRESSIONAL theory to be this h.
W those state. who tore themselves. far AZ ht
nd pro!es relations 10 tic fcsi of The State. th
.al Az, 10 SO dong they forfeited certain rish
CO y 5s!9seaS Sy 10 P a
p! forfeited their right Of repres se,1ation. and mn
Inc val, nov n9 IL w properly and ey Law
not sioral theory TO be, that 1at right could only
IN restored to them oy law, and thai nn'l a Law "
vas oi ,he lG,on "a. permitted tocome bscE and sta,
on The same footing with the other States, it cou
not sne ne rapi n 5en he Lad an
sot poranNy, to amend the nth fset1on ~ M I'd
n 1hs seeng n .G,p ,[s': .sf s ~
e.ceiiss = aaebise ia IN lily STATE Or 70 aii
rect late az eantroi he sane within i,s own i
can- isdiction c~renf A. in inc third section herein
!. S. .cr,heS
Jes. ! Siass-s RuyEK anil SMITH onposcG and ri
~ mn StsEEScK suuDorted the uea snre.
nder Rrrcts .ff Cyenftc for actIon on the tax bill
him r;nsiyeiy.
can- EvE.,cl,-c sESSfnS
osed ....s...se =. IN ,rhon W.. y1o
ent., f7ctfy it!H at1Gnuauce g ~ WILL 'ae ~
DIVA. went in'o Gommiuee o. .ae noe, e .,,,
ldier Mr. DA"f.S III Tue cna1l " .ae - - mo!.
He The nfst section lnnpossny a4 VI asc Gsnls
been pout on coffon otanc 9hoeF eoa:1oela1ou.
nj Of The question hetnI on Lsncn9 amenoment.
resi- cepting Coo pounds IN the nanos o. e pfoaa
' nc from TAXATION. 4 Has fe1ee,ea.
fth1u Mr. GRi>WC OLD snEeetted thst Amss!ean
peril ton At f'EeuaxaFe eentS per pouuu "ou1u a'e
and monopoly Of European malke,e.