New-York tribune., 1866-05-03
BOARD OF yALDERMENYylg
Special Meesing-The Widening OF Ans asl
Fuiton.sts. - The Board Rescind Theis
Former Action on she Matter. A.

y
The Board met, by special call, at o'clock gester|
day afternoon the Prosdep. JoHs BRlos esq tho Chair.
The COMMITTEES Streets reported the following In uslatiou
the widening of Ann and Fulton. .sts:
ing fo III. iosof Mayor 3 as
matter OF widening aud sndx Ann rs.psc
That subject project. h.. enr.xsl
y Interested property proposes
wS i. Psy . ssn sn % esi @ P9SSs Ss aS " ~
Tie Common Council Of last deemus the work TO be
@ S9 Be n % tst marrow w. r % oSs p
the city passed resolution Of authority for comgsncnS
: ss s = Is only 70 o, y ;:S I
.dlolIos and contiguous property that be largely bsnsdssA
% ssT ss sa,s q the ,s.9,isS By q: cs.%s: &. ne:
upon the and un.crupa
o p S % n.JpsT "a pussg Ss s vs,.s
who & ss ss no .ss PHgS s s ssS fI q & 4
ner' City Hail. who fsted soi
e.sa upon the psadI hs ana I'M sn0ssn, c o. S he
ATTEMPT, made either the re.aion repealed
to d,nssc would 6s hsd tie O
Suddenly snd very nyerOu.y th. c,Or termn,tes
city, the respite from cOninuoa. ina
IoScs G the parties Opposed 10 Tie sIss Tsss rs d !" ahs x:
their attorneys and with the act Of the city
s Perception oihs b:r great yss sdv:
evidn, them tha, the completion the I'm
s be- srs.y to sne sdvane p.canan spd Tbs
s eos" o% eon7soa WITH who nss
opposed project aud euinss
e but actually Upheld ,nd cOauenitd hey d.p0'ed
beneficial results certsi. to ou. Of hs
completion Of e WORK and :. Of very S
ton Alphabetically pleaded their inability a ss
Thus the stood until quite recently when wa. nsauoo.y
% . 81 I B;r%s' tie ss %
the Common ccone had In some mSnD1 's'eSry ~ @ ne
The promptly acted By your Committee wss
immediately instituted the nqas to seqant them ay
with the seon Or any, taken by ths .es's,us ~ ,h 's
nfe di interfere woud certainly iniuoa
city They Disappointed IN their
,.u &c c,ps: on
Ofhs clause IN the city s levy pro,O provided .ss
r. Tsq sGps'sSe s ss ees., '1s ssa b
o. ayse In o;her woId the owners PROPERTY at IsGoy
Island viii be compelled pay proportonse Of the
aers, s gST s.n See even h'I 5 . use % ssG
benefited than the residents Of other and more
Your conttee can readily and understand Why the
& snd ~ or s e. .iant or an I'M
BY any possibility be beneficial to them
1s h v,s gp. pps r. oDs Do n % BE- osr
sd and your Committee impeftive day Of In.
Council prevent by repeating the resolution a'hon1ns
Heretofore in,srpo.,ion Of Leu
proposed ,Py sqqstion Of s1pedieOy "A
fpGp .y s ons u @ JUSTICE :; on %sis & no
opinion md Committee to recommend .ss
the intended 70 be PeIpetr,ted upon our tax payer.
nfs1%siioa in the po..s.en your sy .
.by 10 the tina
budenng citizens generally with the cost OF strictly local
proyemes, which should be Orue BY the Of property oen.
hted pdcated upon and taken
solicitations Of Of the blatant sdyocs -
reform municipal government Men who ds
tho
arrive the well hrd Of The CITY ltrs.uJ
Your Committee ofthe facts did hey fee
cned could Justly and ssfsy attribute the mosi drputsbs
who oppose this when intended
benefited by the improvement psy for t. ous
intended benefit them the oftaets
proceed With complete II. ,I. b,
would hereom and have taken the trouble o-r
entire proceedings only with syew OF neutrans the s
vicson unpsrngy paced against the local auhots
gntmen who while accusing others d d
the tsrno and confusion they
themselves the Of the ofour city by -orcP
causing amendment TO be made to 'he city Tax Law oy
which imposes the city large rrpeos
To prevent wrong the Of condemnation
this ehsrseserltic OF the state Lsgsutc
Committee although In aysr OF the sed
perfected in and IN similar oy
sent and recommend fop your favoabls
resolution: =.
Re,sd Tha, resolution approved By bis Honor the Mayos.
December 30, 1865 which reads as follows:
proceedings
upon the Of the resolution Tor widening and
tending accordance ~h the red lines and
the hereto annexed made by Edward Boyle CT
ton aid street, when opened extended be known snt
de.ignd New Broadway" be and il hereby snnassd
BERNARD REILLY,
MICHAEL NORTON.
McbksS
Committee Steets
Tho report was adopted by vote of 10 to and mmedt-
ay sent of Councmen for their concurrence