, 1866-07-31
GRACE CHURCH lMBROGLIO.
Letter from Riahop McXlyalne 10 Rev.
:. ". Cracfn1t-Dr. Crxer11t,s RcsiG-
nAt1on-Rcsolnt1ous Of Grace Church.

Letter from Rtahop mcXlyalne to Rev.
:. ". CraetH1t-Dr. Crxer11t,s RcaIG-
nat1on-Resolntious Of Grace Church.
We publish below letter from Bishop
Mc1lvnfuc to the Rev. J. ". Cracraft, contain
lng Gtrsct1 -fom recent opinion Of Judge.
Hoffman, the eminent writer upon canon
Bishop NeIlvaine and Bishop Whitchouse,
growing ont Of the affairs Of Grace Church.
We also publish letter from Mr.. Crncraft to
the Vestry Of tho Church, giving his reasons
for ccasing to occupy their pulpit, and the
resolutions adopted thereupon BY tho Vestry.
public: $780,.
CINCINNATI, July Z, 1885,
RxyKnrNn AND pZAn Sm, Aiter the publication
Of 80 much Of my Convention Address a. referred
sds@esi q ny hena 5aase io@aa "a q 5f'issa Te1
York. with the reqncat that be would review my
eou1se .nd state to mo ~ opinion. HIs answer
II have geeonside!ed lhe opinion before given
e = ss Of @ IN % @
eraded NJ opinion Was Right j bfleay .esale the
e. 81 ts IseaSs t.as s o 81 ps4 %
ulssorJ. ana the refusal to regard The prohibition
20 on.ctats = having been rcaorod By The proceed
Ss ss ~ sa e. e Jsass
II esaao. 81 tsiak that the highly respectable
authorities q Illinois have not eontasred III tic
sne II snd s &c ad ,s sreeeednss d -
ssd e. liz n e ss = It Sn ss .as ss
Nothing, Il seem. to me. can b more csruneous Or
moro huttfal. We hars no appellate Gibuna1.
IT, assI?ns q eseh ttnun,i ae!Dg under hc
c1ueisr everywhere, OF there ia no eatesy fot Tho
innocent md ~ rein!stieu tot The culpst1s. The
tt apon e a. .as .use
aasieaiIaas enc, ts.t tss p.Iy d. BEEN a pse. pro-
s' ss;sses 'nS Se ''s ah; 'f Hn''tcss ssi
p.e.nnea .hat ~ i'!sua.l q Ohio i nei
ndssd the ony eesst .hieS I'D u,deuopp. FL
pst, .presred; r. sentences ~; q Admoai!on.
i h.a lxen txrsuxa; Essry requirement OF law
FIX oen1s. So eher ~ os
Ct H. ;aT rtshs r. eana action vrcn o
nsn home,cr Ero's si' II IL s.tia!,en. 'e pis.e
epiniou = to tic .rrotee1rR, whether ttshi or
s5s s"F % % stsa, sss :oa e ss II:
sses. IL VI sntitlsl 10 'st,. a. fnli3 :. hs VIZ
ss''' .sx osss s dass.s would t y To- same s
su..!!tn' hsa bsen .lsde E9d hid; 90 moi M
any d,stingilun ltum the Language uf ths closing
wo5's aJi,D ot =; IL S,ron i TT i 'Hr mil b. b
ssoar . On eptty eh.s, w.. ~en e
Mt1casonat tln and ui,|nst. Tho whole quealion Is
thls.Whaf, a31e, u1sl md ls ronseQaences arc
rndet u thr csnonieal put!toh Of thc i.riy ia BIZ
o~n t1oetsr. whore he has bern tried That mus,
10 h!s eanontcal sf1fas In eyrry other diocrsc
Not doubt be tntcttA1pad OF hto full frslot4.
tlun to hs tonne postdon In ohio, AFTER tbe Ad.
mpnltinu."
In conclusion Of his opinion. Judge Holman
rsys, -.
y tsa.s briefly my conclusions upon Tie naaisris,
po!nia:
II. Tho prohibition at tho stshop OF Illinois hsa
fCso fptto trAftd h5 sfitua Of tha proercdinrs In
Ohio md iot!t0 u,tttnf. 4 irta1 ii l1inela upon
ir Illegal.
u, 4 isiai Ia Illinois upon Tho ortz.nal ehareos
wnn1i te Illegal"
ilAva sivoi. yoa ~ much Of Tho paper os Judge
llnsmkn - ansHctt Jon ht,te. Ercnts may tss
qrttc lhat Eise yon tie fttl hereafter.
Your, tsfy tnfy,
tnls. y. XcLvAN9.