The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1866-11-20

instituted N rsoovex ono Prussiaa thaers which the
piann sileees she lent 10 the defendant al Heds 10
tal, in thu Bowery the sist Of July ioSS ON her
arrival in this city Germany To this mate or facts
the painla testified in the most positive mannor and
ths defendant as positively swore thai be nsven. Dor
rowea cent from her, and that What No phinsin
swore was utterly false. A ahditonl defence no
produced a general release signed oy the plainth an
iarch 1854 This release The plaintiff said vas obtained
nsl ass ~ es, q no.
~ epoi the defendant who csxrjes on
street, that no became acquainted with the plain
t nrst At Leipsc, in Saxony in 1868 and was wen &C
Ca n S s s a.
Magdeburg where he left her and he proceeded his
journey g the United States The lads. who vas |.
arrival 10 New YORK The deendsns ssmisd sSa. he
visited the paahtG 6Ess q Heds Hossl afterwards ct
the Prescott House, and later in Spring street, Al an
hours Of the day and night and later In the Third ave
several orths a biz mistress fact until the alleged
release wae executed In March, lSoA Az that time Is
appeared the plaintiff was within month or two
Of her connnement and the defendant, Eupposed
tween them by the aid and advice Of Mr. Stenmler for
Ssss AZ s Sc
the reoase md obtained from tho defendant 426O0 but
she testified that se never Rad the relsase nor knew
saon with her led her 10 believe that Il was leoeips
for ~ 6oo account Of the 5000 she hsd lent hu.
= sssss
upon the defendant for breach OF promise OF marriage
Al the time the release executed the defendant
port the child maintain II and leave II h the plaintiffs
custody until II was ssven years old The child, how
ever stlb0rn Two months after ths the defendant
appears 70 have ropensed OF the arrangement and went
back 70 live with the plaintiff. IN Forsyth street, but
soon after he again left her She then instituted this
suit
The case has been on trial days, and closely
Judge Barbour charging the jury said the had
been prepared and tried with the greatest ability both
Sides and could never be tried better again II was,
therefore, very desirable that the jury should ind
dict although clear that other Of the party
had committed rank perjury. ftEs
The jury reformed verdict for the plaintiff. They
credited the defendant with the 81 500 paid at the time
Of the release and found for The plaintiff for g. 900 &c.
being the amount OF The balance OF $b.0 00 with in
tercst.
respectively The lady s rather good locking and gave
her evidence with much She 10 evidently person
who has been we'll educated. ,asY a
Counsel for the plaintiff, Messrs Staknecht and Hall
for defendant, Kaufman, Franks and Wcoxson
A Man who Falls Over PROSTATE Lamp
post gets Henvy Damages against the Corr
p0rattOn. t n.ast
Before Judge Jones and Jury
Kim6dl us he Mayor and Corporation Of NeD Fork =
Plaintiff sued the Mayor and Corporation Of New York
for S. 600 damages IT appeared that the night Of
the 18th of May, 1885, the plaintiff while walking
In Fifty eighth street, between First and Second
avenue, fell a lamp post, which lying the
way and fractured his leg and ankle. The plaintiff
lame The defendants pleaded that they liable
they had not got notice Of the condition in which the
lamp post was but the PLAINTIFFS that the lamp
should have known all about it. The jury found
dict for The plaintiff; damages 5000