, 1866-04-28

whep pclton IS tntox,eatsd- hnt not Invariably.
Incn very differently, 80 that ~hnt produces deei-
ued efecl Cpon one man Will prc0uce tsEtc effect
upon another; ard the clects upon ths ssne mn
viii nc titcttn. 81 11uesent TUNES.
THE TEsT1ToSY
n the cae at this tuncture vas closed both fos h-
otEx1S0 AnGUuEx1 TOR TUE PEOPLE.
Nohest Ierse5. E=q,, opened The argument to
shn 3u1y ou behalf Of ths people. s..
eonpse! dAelt upon the uomtn!ous queaions
VOWED IN the deliberations uf The Interpretations
ms9'ns ',' ne IT, OF frl'oubeinR. and ail that
.atue NE sa!uahle. The counsel for the prisoner
~ hls opening statement bad not m1,aksn the pe-
sson 81 ihs stag in asserting that 1t was ecsuAted
ns,e W nrsoner ,9 81 th s 70 hound On ths un1ou-
msn, ~ u tae Stsle aetuated ~ any ssntt-
1em " 9hk a"ol1oh n1i or oesss to plGsk lsuscls
tised veraet @ eonsonaas '11 WITH i1e. iGe a. d.
nuom ,bn ,.T ss5 nno Hgnt-a verdict based
np,hinn iess 7ho tae more,
~ ~ an ,i 1ns r.hoass 81 'ae oas Was man
s " He VI le ne nao pFuspefed IN lie.
sai ana neeu nsp!Iy aua Peaeel9Hy, suttonndet BY
to'n m.e s. ano aaIng; an'n ne teH demon In
tGs liquors entered Ike the iton into bis eoul.
:, lnls sppeute-an appetite which bag brought
hoassrds to WslE he Ind sh lne eansss snsa
living eepuchses Ct every kindly feeilusts le,In-
ed counsel attributed the sole and only cau>e oi The
II could not be denied TINT eases have occurred In
Nhtch no<l di.6stsons ac1s have been perpc:sated
sssE .ae s9 10y Of nans md ast cases
dom, fts reasons bsscnd the comprehension Of
Mo1A!a. nay sec III 70 lack reason on her
msda znh aIa ,Ga1 sae oe;cnee q insanity maY Be
C. eni' no, me qnsst,o for the Jury to consider
Mnstnes ,nas snsh defence nay Be made i not Tor
se 70 Goesaeer taat Haoaeld IN TT Of in.ani1J
a OF 'nat men nave nEea, who lanoEed under the
aEnsi9u tnat toeF refc possessed Of the attributes
2, n''1ls' Ut whether 'his Is one Of tso.e
The Prisoner bad been for many years the hus.
OaNu o. I'M, F:oman-a woman Of SUCH character
OF peace and kindaness Is wonld kinde TIC Dis
sion Of lore in the he1Tt Of stone-esti1nab]e in
all see rslaHns good mo.hes and kind I'D
for years without tnnrmar, nntll forced to y fom
the house Of The nan Who mad sworn 10 lore. honor
The counsel then proceeded to pazatc the c,rcuu.-
ssanec- ns the homicide nnd its efficient csrse-.
holding. In speaking Of The deIusion unaer which
1t 'he Jury satisfied thai that ieius,on had
ersdicsted The roHer In his mid Of distinguishing
bes~.en right and wrong. they cnuld moi acirit lin.
uelcalou. = the medical men had tefuesi it. Nas
Wien Wien .he m.Ea believed Or entestained belief.
%;sol,S ;s, Of 1een Il ,h returned
mankind, ,hey s5s ~ labonnc under dtlu-on and atr
nr.:ronsihlt Vas each an idea uationa.
nature and tntels Of 'he tpGir Of Jealousy, tae
counsel stated ts The reat question for the conS1-
rls'ion 9. INC JEry, Did this prisoner think bis
VIC un!a1thiu'. noEc.1s and Sincerely and did he
n MS sopseaTescs o. 1ne ;.on Of =ou.y esuaed BY
her dea!h: Il was 70 matter how .!,sbt was ' thc
toundatto1 OF the testimony by which be ar
1.tsd at t1at conclusion; the Question stul 7vas
ne bsi1ese IT and cherish tha, belief for ycar-s
id ne, MhSn ths hat5td casstd h5 thai lcltef
~ assono n, con'rol deprive her OF her ;e vsnc1
haeet ~ . ~, ,ne nMenes Q, Intoxicating dnnkf 1t may
~ ~ ,ne wus1a Sa :nat NEe. lcpps was woman OF
m nho,,m,sned ehasastes, tha. 'o Ill who knew her
~, hpFsascG Y; ~ ensste ana s1ftuou. woman, and
hs ~ w. H.. H. sns Nas So s.:tl hef husband may hare
* Te1 ~ ~, re Of som: {ea-on unknown 10
IT, ue "os 'a,,E Mh:c4 1pfe::sd htm with beret Of