, 1866-03-14

NoEAa-eAS"s 2Hu tefQtCtx-FrpA
bate and Crtmiual Busfnes-a
Runaway and It's Besa,ss-
Estates to BE- Adjadi-
Gated To-day
~ ForEe.y.
uhI1ED erATEs CrncC1T CouEr-BefoTe Hon.
1honads Df117snond. .Ju10e,-Supent * Srne..
sn1e ~ q loci isand County. Plea and sppesr-
assees damages. "e''1 ~
.+,ss worthinEten -. T.leott Default and clerk H.
Qn1Fby y. Brown & n. In Channery. Cause
argued End taken under adytsement.
1auot "a Austin. Dttmfssed.
5hosaas UTzs7sRond, Jnd9e-Hanlop ct al IA
steam Tug Geo1ge n. Wood. In admiralty, Desih
o. @ anooas si9ras suggested. and Names OF e1ecu-
SrfERIon counr c. CH1cAoo-Befosx Hon.
.Jahn u. E,tson, Gaaef Josnee aM Noa;. Jose1H z
Gy. GGd1y. a1d yoaa 4 5asaeson, -4&soesatt Juttees-
vseate Judgment ard set detsult On atiaa1lt nd
payment Of al eoste ot eaid ded4nlt md judRmrnt
bto11 5snda "; ascDesr e. d. Judgment on default
previously entered for $s4n61. 11'
s..ee kss aststea Z a's :, { 4 Xc's for plaintiff and
kraes q al. VI Casey. Ie4y. To plaintiffs to Ole
sexes.l rep'1eat,ops to defendant.s plea. ~
Howard - Dixie e a. Motion tor new tsial Fur
Isaac bike, Henry b. Dixie md Geprpe Woroy. to
dsed Ce ZEE is paysSe e. = e.
8 Dits, BTe: s g: nd iDaoFssd wit s'Wihoas e r.
The @nry found verdict for the defendant Octo-
ber 2, lS65 nhe1eupon plaintiff moved tor uer
O'Drian IT. Moody ct al. Jor5 called and exu.e
tried. This waf an action OF tfespass UPON lhe
ass,n.t Wil.am Moody .aa William Moody. jrs 10
Plaintiff chasree that on the ID Of last October,
hnr>e attached to waeon belonn1ng TO defendants
was 20 unski'tully md czelcsaly driven along CLARK
carriage and team OF hir, standins on the hack
s'apd On the east side Of the Coun Uonse and that
BY s1d .aG fo.tSn p's'ntne Sshcle Ess much dam
The defence clam that at the time OF The accident
their horse WIS running away; thAt be ms beyond
The control OF ht hrver, who, having lost all pow
the progress o! his animal. Of save him.elf from
The lmpu anon. . be dr1sesh tu1soutly.%'
K'mbsll W. nss E; q y Verdict tos p.!n1iK and
Trial and In a1reat Of judgment By defendants This
Mn* ~, A. act!on Of as*1mpeit: commenced December
Bis and Aadaon Aver. late partners, doluc basi-
neeE under the h1m name Of Bis. 4 Avery, to re-
cover damages hid At $2a0. Plaintiffs, In their
1ssIafstion set ioth bat On The lib Of September
by tho raid dcfcrdAnts and John F. Starr II as
covenanted that sofd defendants snnuld tan curry,
1Au ]u44f uQ1ktl. ID EE492GA Die T3nf.
aud il a wosknasnlIke manner, Al tne eaif sEins
that thld Starr thon1d furnish within twelve
ponths from the date thereof; and that eald bhss
saief. ninety cents at the then market prices for
each fktn eaid defendants should make fa1ea Of
said stock and il ead s'aT reiu.ed 70 sell The eaid
B11.e q Avery might seu fuch portion a. would BE-
sufficient to par them; md thaf after 1urther 1ay~
sSead eaasF ill., d1idsd ~ Fisaa fh p faeths1 aetae4
Nh5ch to have fpt1S prepared the ekluh for market.
that esd Starr on the 18th md s6th Of September.
lseA pusnanl 70 The contract Aforesaid. det,.essd
prepared rs afosess,d. Of The valae Of $1oa5 but
In, defendants instead Of prrpsEing the sktns
.sme fos len months 10 The ds@sze 10 Starr Of
fam, he, being delivered IN such IN improper
and nav worimanllke manner that be lost the i'd
1865 the plaintiff, ut The request Of defendants.
and afler raid tarr agreed TO rcIeasc and discharge
them from all demand By reason Of said articles or
Is scco1t to the plaintiff ipstead Of said Start did
'Ake an assignment and transfer Of raid articles or
Agreement for = sHluahe consideration; when
ea1d leather transportation, they have always Deg
1ecied and refused 10 % 20.
The defendants in their pea eet forth that by The
telns Of said agreement lney we1e entlled 10 eel
enoleh Of sald hides to pay the expenses ot ,an-
ninethat The hides 70 sold By them realized ssssll
w6 = to s eu hsy @ n,sa g 81, s
account Of raid rates Q! leather $255; that they
hare been ever since ready eel the reslne Of The
and aa @ e .s .Se aa taid I sf.1 sia i IT,
debted to them in tum which the plaiut11 BY the
aeelsnment must have aseutnrd, nDd that tn cou.e-
Cl1rk ct IL. II. The City Of Chicago. Submitted
to eourt. Finding for defendant.
D,hat vE. Bruner. On t1tai- ....
Potter ct al ". Van setback ct nj. Dismissed At
plaintiKs cost. On motion Of plntntifs attorney.
Coursen ". Wallace e1 Il. Dismissed Ut plainrfu's
cosis, On motion Of plaintiff : attorney.
T{z f4r N~Tt
g. .Dr." Adonlt "; casley ct aL
81 Eisend1ash Is. Dellenberg.
Is. Roth ". Moore.
81 Culver ys. Williams.
81. White, ute, etc ~; shef~in-
g. Gall Ts. eamc.
36. naggerty, surv., vs- DroE1- ct al.
Ntu saats-ClaDcy n. burroughs An action Of
co.rnanl pse commencea bs Thonaas Clancy aeatnst
benjamin BuuouEh to recover damage. laid Al $50:
Pe,tz. Ac1ion Of tretpass On The c.se- The plain.
Ge forth that thry were formerly partners, snd
eaps e i s sos ca
upon them End, stating thAt he owned atw ~. n
Michigan npea "hSa he eos,s osna,S borrow h x,'GS
cneese, to Lori.ViIle, Keatucky, md that he
should receive and rel the same. leecrins as cnm
tssie m soT any loetes shat be sf.o oaeTed, il ;hey
/ I .at,so
amount Of fso 70 8 ;ooo ths. he wonld mise thss
a seq uRon n p+vi1 III iah tbe Pn1i fu1
sheT nere thsf pureuaut to thss arrangement they.
auo 70 nf hs on1
81 go+ Il III * .n3 fhsf Tia fssm in M{chirnn II
nn.sSv t,nsrins,fsc >A>'' s'>@ >'>'
pTsS5 an.s ~ ;raah,na,.s, ,orr r1.;,5na ,e
2DGG.!H Upon the 2t1tdati:s OF plaintiffs. wit
Of oaptaS al fesTpnd1zdtnA was Issued agatust the
n II non s s. h,s ~ ,cs an ne; q
9ca 70 i,ege, nr n1'nS II =, xo8 H.,
McEns Lo;,. eor t:itx ~ rtic.rn
4,, ~ s. ;,,i T. ~. ;.n,}r IN ~ ~ -
Motso3 ,,s1ued .a = nent on 1o vc,diet
n,tont ~ u,s,fiT am,., grsved sns sSnT.
- t,nUd - ~ tt ~ Ss~r.r1tans - * ALA ,rittfn
~ 5.c. s11 0AN oAA " s~~~fs' ~ "~ '~'1~ "'S3A
VI =, .ho rt, ,.,.t,ta ~ xr f,ros,r an ,c.o,
,h. st-n e.i1.t - ~ ,nsc;9x T. rsorer
a,L ~" sn ia - * foI inn,,ea s1sssine9 ~
h x f,,;n1 th,..h ~ hn,e n r,T-1, sider.ft
~ t ~ t1re o;,st 49, M I'VE po!4 fiee
aa;s e, rdo1,t ~, 1.df11 n .nd ~.
tAsCi :, y. 1 .tut.tu as'I1" ~ N110A~e ~"1 -
HOUNDS n. oilbefl e. 81. verdict o. ao' suu|s'
~ nuE,s III u4a y IN aaedxnt ia ne ad
onio1M ooaa N soe ELL o' s1oop' 'fs ntsA oss VI
neLt tet1n. ~~.,,..x ,>,.-.a .. .,,,,,,s7.
e<e,s 1aP for Ran; NJ q nsosstatiou. 81 A'us'0
Montanesg et u =. IT, Ls Seaod Wfm1sreo t,n Al
platnpn eo+1t 1n I9on o. Rlslaua =. ,1aeyr-s
oo.fs 81 fe1 for Wan! n. q ns prosseanon, -
bak@ Y. 4teniGsn sou'9s11 s.1 ano Sot'oesn In
diana Asi!5oaa compa3es;; 3n7 ~ t s,hr,ce. tho ri.
!ne n1aI ealenoaf 'os 'o"osS' eo''sa'1= LIE 1'l'
IL. Earacwanefh r. he9cbnT e; q.
IL. Hammond. nee, ete, vs.. Ahtnfn ei a.
121. Noron " aayes.
X. GGonnes ": esImsm. s,.,a s.r;nc, ,,.,,,u
tim