New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-06-02
The Strong Divorce AEain-floiiou for Aiimony
Pendeute Elite.

In the Superior Court before Justice Jones, ycster.
dsy the Of Peter Strong against Mary T. Strong
motion wa made for the allowance Of counsel fee aud the
Necessary expenses Of the reta Of tho M 70 the counsel Of
the wife during the pending Of the action On behalf Of the
motion affidavit OF Mr Gerry read by him. setting
that tho defendant has good AID valid defense and giving
short history Of the Nineteen witnesses were examined
for plaintiff Eve for the defendant That he
derstauds that the plaintiff intends for new trial aud
that the defendants separate estate 10 small.
John Austin Seyenss aft day sets forth that Mrs strongs
separate estate exceed $500 and has been already
up in legal expenses that Mi Strong IS man o. indie
pendent means having. according % u6 own admittlon
e. per annum and being entitled to share IN his fers
estate with several hundred thouand dollars De'do that no
amouy counsel fee allowance has before been demanded
paid that tho defendant has not since tiled 10 bling tic
case for Tetral
Nj Gory then proceeded to state he peadngs and issues
which submitted on the trial.
Mr Gran IN opposition read from the affidavit Of Mrs
Strong that she did not know Of tine alleged aduresO hr
Strong tin the 18Th Of January l.o5 snt he la to the sup
Elemental onsHer stating those scis positive. go,
lie then read the Plaintiffs affidavit, seng forth that the
defendant had ator writ Of hsbeas corpus issued removed
ono VI her ohdreu ana was seer geo WIN Tor TINE IN
Canada sccreet with ID oi the Sate that
the 18Th Day o. January In the yogF ls about II months
after The commencement OF the suit Tie C.ndant served
notice Of motion for leave 20 supplemental answer
him. charging him With adultery which, with notifications,
grantod; tAat on IeOlay - 300 be was arrested az
the instance OF the defendant, and charge OF
felony preferred before the Grand jury; that that indic
men WGi fr0cnies paI on pagis ptl4lei b one OF her
counsel ard thai the entire evidence was maufesY ilsu
fcea 10 show Tia any had been and was
untrustwothy character ta no was arrested without
having the nsl0 preliminary examinations that he denied the
charge and requested speedy ii tat ne was promised II.
u was unable Notwithstanding bis earnest Efforts 20 obtain
il under eight months that he tired IN October aud
quilted and thai the charges IN the indictment were false and
M b T. persualcd that tic criminal prost 4oa effected
through tie dOrs OF defendant ana hei FANNY solely from
motives Of private malice AID a. damage Dis character and
iDiuriou-lg affect the issue Of this suit
TIA. before said trial and ncquitta several Efforts
made y both families. with his approval 10 haVe the issues
riyfeir settled hv reference arbitration. to avoid the
scandal Of public trial THAI 10 June an apem was made TO
tho senior both sides requesting ihem 70 urge upon
tie acting counsel the piopiley o. pinat' 1e.o.on ~
.ave-I preminen o. both families. ana mat he
promptly expressed his readiness 70 enter INTO 81
70 rrnose bat that answer made 10 the acting
that AFTER laid trial IN November leo when this case
va, OK the point Of being reached in answer 10 fgseson
re Court plsutf counsel expressed 10 the Court his
ruro,.ss 10 refer 70 which defendants counsel made no
nsey nat n trial commenced NOV - lstJ ana eoncuned
10 s l-5 that the result OF the tria ana the nndings OF
the NV tire stated in card BY certain emoeF o. lne jury
Lef Al fbe time CThe affidavit inserts copy OF the
lta That tie findings Of the jury a. siaed IT. tue cafn
we've announced in open Court prior 10 tie use nfe ara
,.. motion was thereupOn made ~ nave lhf INNINGS on
10. ~, Which thev were agreed recorded ~ verdict,
was denied: that tho guilt OF the dsieheiH AIa IIe
MOI lr vcnes thereof By deponcnt were on Il3 ~ Sl
bshed Us the evidence and on the VI
NJ an both those issues: that he u SIN deslroa 10 lave
e fe. settled ,v reference or arbitration ana soc We
r.l ms cgored consent 20 Trial by reletee elei on
bo vidcgoa already taken or on any evidence 20 ~
fc referee tu tLst OF the propositions Dave "e1H
accepted rr Che cef.ndfnt $500 -. a.. ohila~eu Il,
Ttr derdeat since Der addiction OF ore on he 70
limo sit La. eve. since concealed Llisel bbh 's t
rf w o eers Lave lot beer ~ ANY l-4e lA u ci'9 A."
al ii once fo- lew days within this stare, NheA ~, ~
aha ~ 90 verify Ter supplemental answer ana Ineu"!
1et lie ec OF adultery charged in Tie answer are altered
place only iu the Cg OF AcF aoIh tua' -
answer vcfihct 90 Albany on tie ly.l &
the allegations 10 mon answer were iiaoe OF ~. ~, v
kHowcfr, wir IN ar dayit made tne tai1o or! ~
.f 10 alleged tat she first became aware OF mos
ffal day. fLt chose charges are cltttN la'. lli'
rrr been i.fIu 40 MS vile either before O. tlce or ur
r lf .s- inLffiy. that % iris Che Ctargf "hst
porsa onl, 0' tho aVdaaoe u qls EafA Ws.a s'HAA