New-York daily tribune., 1866-01-11
LAW INTELLEGENCE.
SUPREME COURT r. Cmcurr-JAs. lo.-Before Justice
BALLOON.
AseTCyNFNrS BY ONE PAETSER.
Ns1GNHENT5 DI V'n fHI


sophia G. La.ell iy J,mes Meyer.and others
In this and seven other snits aganst various uc'
the plaintiff seeks to recover var9s portions % sv
indebted TbGrber in about Soooo ana yo.ison o
member cf the firm, without consulting WIN nls pth
made an assignment OF sl the property oil the br 10 '
and shortly after absconded His par'ners-snow
few DAYS serward made an assignment ioT the Denn. o
creditors to the defendants in the rst action The
collected som. $50 and salt brought to recover thif
amount from tnem. suit was some time age Ih-ueu ~
wa, void as made by two partners in the nOenca oil VIC
third; but sustained at the General Term. i.urps
made assignment Of his interests to the pann IN n sui
The eendlnts conended tina, tho assignment, having oh
made by one partner alone for s and past hdebcdnes 40
the consideration, without the discharge o that
wa. such sale m inadequate CONFEDERATION Us 10 De you'
and had at any rate many Of fraud on 1t as 10 DC
proper question of the jury, aud tqt The conveyance
70, di.wi"si Of the compan, The Cout ruled thai te
assignment Tnuber not void il made 0r saiuaoc
consideration ard made and taken in good lih ist we
consideration proved sufficient bat tast "nehef 'ne
assignment made In good faith was question of
Counsel for plntiG then obrreds Judgment ron ~ "ue
WAS decided that that .signucnt had en made ain sht"
in good faith and The Court therenpon directed HNeso' "
the plaintiff tor the amount ciamed fso' w. a.. ,
Tie suits were decided By consent ~ INC a-'
manner, amounting in the aggregate to about ibo
Levi 4. Fuller psinth; Miller, Pees Nichols Tor de-
iendant.
John Ferguson sgt Louisa Fritz and T. [. fIiT, oc
% T . Ts' a. as,'F . II. Mi os Which s c"sd
contracted By the defendants 20 be delivered to pnh me
evidence showed that the husband a; te sse 10, Gon
and that they had mad contract stated aud that zoo
had been paid the following day on the contract ie
plaintiff claimed that this payr ent yves by the custom %
chants the immediate payment In" ort dismissed
the complaint the ground the husband bens the agent
bad to employ sub and that the payment on
the sbsequsnt day did avail to naIr the CONTRACT bnd
CHAxBgas-JAS. l0.-Bsfore Justice SUTHERLAND
DEcrsIoSs.
George Law agt. the Mayor &c.-Mcmoranda
for counsel. sItan r Williamson sst. Henry w. Whiah.
.onRepor Of Referee confirmed and judgment OF dy.rco
ened psiun 10 have the custody Of the chideJ mary
Pierce Ben PierceRei.rrd blck for further proofs
Henry T. Bru.h at Ca'harine G. BrushReport OF hei'r'c
confirmed jud Of divonce granted Maria schw
ger ny Charles L. of Referee confirmed
and Judgment in separation rom bed and board pa'nh 70
have the custody Of the child
SPECIAL rYkY-JAy l0-Before judge McCrSS.
Chas. II. Noyes agt. Geo. Chapman. n.-Plaintih :
motion to postpone granted Geo. X. Nilrnos AIT
Russell 5. .Wall.-Motion denied with Sl0 costs Thomas
Lynch act John McDonaldSame decision Robert Pam
ott agt The KnckeFbocker Ice Company Motion granted
ard referred 90 referee 10 hear, Se Jses b. Soisa
AIT FrsnciI Gbney for dei-ndan bud.n2s o
fact with tho Clerk at Special Term
Before Judge BRADY
WIFI agt Menzer-Decrec for plaintiff 20 be seit"''
Strong ag hitrnsn Motion granted with : ~ costs 10
either party to sbide event. Gnnel sst OeiIich''-see
opinion.