, 1866-04-10
LAW iRTELLiGEhCE,


new tz1al ove9Tnled. mud judgment on verdict.
Vans ct Al. VI. Forsyth. Mohon by defendant
zot new trial alcued. ann taken under ad1semenf.
deisndant argued and taken under adv,temcnt
Dr11cr ". Carpenter Motion iot u neS trial
ana psap oa' Monoe for new tia, over
ruled. and judom ri IN verdict.
stiles ~. s.ile.. Motion ~ defendant for = new
Miller et a. yt t}ninaby ct n Sui, oIsmissed OF
motion ot plaintiffs attorney.
NJ. Iiiiton. tnitf ;nst;et. aa1 ttons. J. T. oa,g
and j. 4. .kza.xon. Associate -{NsstceS-klfoy
VI. El,- r al. Default Of defendant stnseis only.
and Judgment fos deh, Il. .aso.53. and daaaagrt,
ltsasd.lts e. q; r. As7fy. 'aas@ens g on de-
tnrtauier b, aereement. Submitted 70 con1 for
tHai. and det1ee for 3s64.
-, psnickon r; - vhn:tea+en ct al. In chsnce'y,
JeSc.1vs isrand q Il In chaneery: Default for
want Q! answer. and reference 10 >cost, msster. 10
Deeas,er ". hui Ct Il. In ehaneesy. Report o,
commissioners Of eale tlcd and confirmed.
i,.snkmsnn "; HeneE f. r. T. judgement on de-
l,as1. vk. Ma}dcns- Trial BY court Verdict for
plainfln and damages a.ses Cd q &C.. 81. 1udg-
lond AID bII Of exceptions te bc died wihin diteen
tsi,l.ne- ct al ys. Smith Tsi.1 by jury, aud yer
bohan e Al, VI. same. 1ral hy jury: md VET:
dsI for psin,ia !.;I p'mafe+ fe*es~ed al sssi and
Ayrrr v. North chfcngo CITY Railway Company.
On i,lat.
The u1al calendar for to-day comprises The fol
a. 0rcnlt w. N. Z. C. Rw, Co.
a. Fay Il ri. "a. khodes Ct n.
d. Kelly ". Norm
d. >tllcr W. sliles.
4B. tloodhear ". Cummlns ct a.
81. Muldoon " Adlazd.
81. Jacob. e. a. ". cummtns ct al.
s.. Suahorn Ct nj. vb. Union stock Yafds 4 T.
., Aycr, use: ETC., ye. Tsslas.
Mar suits -llueh Alexander sE. Ellen Cunning.
ham and Anthony O'ia Action Of fsplevin 10 70.
coyI poss session OF = quantiiy Of bousebold uni.
tn1e.
rrplesip 10 recover possession OF one hundred and
Jobn Psrte1 ". Charles II. Chadwick, Appeal
from {u.tjee Of the pence
JtAn Clssk and kabost Clark n. Cotpeltus Nc
t;innc.s. Action Of fastumpsit to recover damages
Laid Vi x40o.
yans OF Ast a. = 10 h1aE sna
lad nj 3qn 100.
Dsrd.,ch st1uclman vs. James Hamilton and An.
mir Hamilton, lll| In chaneery,
EiHcC17 Cornr or COOK couxr-Brfore Boa.
Eraetus =. 1l,il!iGns. juIge.-IayIor ". Parsons.
Dismissed ior Ennt Of pf1ssAcrl,nr
Riuc!cy Ct al. ve. HUB 4ru ct ii. Same order.
Pitt yo. IL vnoIue >ane order.
b1n]or. u+e. etc, ve The Western Ftrt Valley In
~.
tult Ahaied.
ffulbuIt ". Fetcrman- Dismissed 1t plaintiff d
costs for want Of rrosecntiou.
Livingston VI. Church. Hame order.
Kece1 "a. Walker. Same ord,F.
Corbin ct al vs. American Exprtes Co, Same
otuet.
Farmer ct a. -. Daley. Ssme orte.,
Fish rs. Gsbbs ct al. Same order.
Hall G, al Vi. Prescott et u. Same order.
WILCOX ct Al. vs. Uesr ct al Stricken from
docket -"
costf. for wsn; Of proeecurion.
Morton el 1t. v. Lyman. same o1tier.
1tober,> vs. Gtay, Judgment Ios plnin,tG for one
cent DAMAGES and cost4, ="
emnh Y. Gilbert ct a. Stricken from docket
per stipulation on file.
Ellstnorre VI. E1y ct I'll Dismissed at plaintiff i
cotte. on motion OF pIsinsif3r Attorney
Hubbard ct al. w. hE.t et a. Ulrmissed 1t
p1alut,fIe' co. IL fo1 E1pl al nrosecu1ion.
Hubbard ct H. Is. Nc New v foiI Lumserins Com.
papy. cau,e uldr4.
Nawle,Fo ": aosley. Same order.
rullen vs.. Belia1. Judgment for plai1d6 for
property. ant one cent danaasr4 and coTts.
Board Of Tfus,ces Of The 1iIiaoi< 4 Michigan
Canal w. Brown ct al Dernissed at plaintln 3 costs
Tor 7apf Of p1o-ecutiou
Bc.r.I el ii. VI. Hoslcy. Same order.
Dlass vt. Klein {, al. Sape order.
LYMAN ". Wilder ct ii. Diem,tsed for ,ysnt q
ptost cution, with return Of properly and costs.
Mcdonald VI. Marsh: Appeal dismirsed with
1roeedeado, for want Of prosecution II cs1eodantl
co.te
Henderson ". Delson. SUIT dismissed 1t p]aln
Moore ute &c. =. Wee,ezn W*o,1d 1n.ursnc,
COMPANY. same order.
Austin ve. u.tttnE. Same order.
11ukcrton VI. Rankin. cafL1+hee. etc. Appe4
di-m,-eeu At costs Of C11pisnet w1th proca1esdo
Rlcl's ei al. yt. caspentr1 al Appeal dlsmlssed =
deftndaut'f cofts, with frptedao, foe want Of pro
seca1iop.
dendnnie co..s |os want Of proeccu,ion with prpes
dsndo.
Butli ys I.ohh rarnikhfF etc. Cnit d1gm{ssed
plaintiff coeis for want Of prosecuuou.
nayf VI. Seiliy ct al same order.
LanEan ". Mnlilcap. euis dismissed It platnuR's
eo+ts. Ueatb Of defendant enecr..cd-
Hanley ~ MulIsan. bame orucr
Moore vt Same. same order.
Mckinley VI. Mcdonald. Appeal dtamlssed viii
1roceffeaao for want Of prosecution
Intnam " Gilbert Dismissed at PLAINTIFF 3 cost.
W Wste sns' - ~ seeeS: stesSs";aa same oru...
Gs.tlin " Hicks ct q: same order.
Kline "a Hobinro,, ct H. sane ordes
Higgins ct al. vs Iu.eell. same order.
t:~ood vs Ehlc. same or1es.
McCormick " Rar'son ct II. Same order.
Dofothy y HubhaIu. Appeal dtsmls4ed with
procedtndo for want oi prosecution Ut defendants
coris.
Miller admir- ". Hubbard. D1smissed Ut plain
tifI + costs fur want uf pro-ecatiuu,
Bu'lin, administrator, VI. saue. Same order
LIrnz Hamsnisfrutt1x, W. kame. Ssme ordes
l1oran. adnrnitt.atrix. -. tame. same order.
Eol,, adu,Dss1rat. ix, se. same Same osncr.
Rtct. administrator, VI. Ea,ne. eame order.
Dustin. aoninitrsator, st same same order.
Es1xton, administration. v.. eame. same order.
Goa IS. Dodge. same order.
Nounan vs.. Cash. Appeal dismissed With proce.
erdo for want OF prosecution. II ae1endanif costS
Murphy ss. Walker. hanlc oroer.
Brown " Zines e al snff dismissed for wan1
OF prosecution at plaintiffs cost.
He,ttnrtt $s. Cnuninsham. Appea, dismissed ai
defendants eorts, with Irocsieyi0 toF want o
prosecution,
Bncke1atcr v. nonElae. sult dismissed 4,
tpo,ut s et nj " totrroyc. Dismissed at 1,lsfn
.ir"r COST 'or wsut Of prosecution.
same VI. Miller. same order.
*hrx ". snsdackrr;c, al! .amc order.