, 1866-02-02
Law INTELLIGENCE.
The Case Against the City--.Another
Complaining iTlfe--Reoltal Of Her
Hronrs-.-Writs Of Capins...
overwhelmingly and
ProbRte.-.Business.

tS11tp s1ATs ctRcur cocRr-Bt1orx Hod
1"e.sae Mt"'aaond, .fad9e-3hs case Of M.cdonsI
tnin-tss s Sy u eaacago, 10 recover damages 70
!oyaisa fscc1fed By tall lhrpprh an .1l.eed 4,
'esu1s srn,S.n Sidewalk. wss on tsisl yesterday.
n tne lIial csltnaar for ,hie court for the Fehrn
toe caee reading u follows In our I.sne
1S5.; 1MS5ai1s: schenk ,s Fusb,sh.
l9l7-l7a Hasltns ". HsxkYn..
NV Su!1s-fayior n. Taylus, Thf. vrs. an ~
uon n chanre1y. Instituted by Alice + Tnrin,
against her husband Charea s. faylor. ta o1f.in
HI ta Of the exttnguishment Of The mp
ne petitioner IN her bin Of complaint ssserts
ta4I enc Hss married to the defendant 1t Isncsster
sentsmsp 9H9 q IT Gisn Wisconsin, on the It'll 81
the maraee union she removed Vii heg 81 9;
70 Evanston N thts county and state. where t;'s
i Is .s se !, ,Is sn I'D vie u9d Dc
boy-wHs born or the 18th Of August. hi Tns
complainant cia1ns that, during her cnitre tn.,-s
e,s aa 1gne u. ~ he5 power to render her
ever hem bin ne md fastni iR Rrinnais ana ,ns nas
sEoGfe: but It Is chsEerd that disresard1ns tbts @
at lie ALTAR, the defendant behaved bimsa't =,
ver. cruel and unk1nd manner TO nie cr7 anat,: ~
1sGt ,nat 'oS ions 'ie prior The 1sth o Koveabe,
s Se,,e4 &c eeo 6on'naG1 6at md to abuse and insult
> .cknsss following The Erb aof,ns m her
SSd i's r. e e. rRatsy ahnsed and hses,enc h
e .oG ga and also continued to do 70
frnF Of her lie she ca,ms She ms rnmaii.'a
leave hin having also iusi prior to tbat ,me earne1 ~
- ,n11 In a aad ,aed and entirely nssee,ed
tloner sssetts that having implicit copfdcnce ~ a
husband. ehe 50 continued 10 live win him wiibont
ons ons kp1slsf 'Ssi be or VI, Information ssy
vr1noue iIe. md VA. terribly epsed 1o iasS;, =,
The assoe1a.1ons be had rccklcssy entW1ncd asnund
ts 1eaI1 Ia az 1 u 81
In Chcagu, nlso tlat in 1868 be siulIariT n.Farde
Iih another 10Th isa, female named ulta <Ptll il Ibis
doned character In Iotorious house Of
,maa Ii a3G ee on st1tf ,,I1y ftTgst kep, Sy
Of December las', tle defendant 1ef his Stste and
went 10 California. from which place be wrofe to
w vile. threatenn: to take her life md boast,nc
Edison ys. Sna,e1y. This was an sci1on n, "a,
sunpsit Instituted by &. e. E1dson. nf Tsrahte
county. OHIO, agalnst John U. sn,vcly. to recorer
eto, dated July 1863 al Ealon, Pfebie S cnsnty gt
daytt Ct FL Thompson, a.ent fos complainant, 1t
the de!endhnt to eecuFe whatever Judgment nn7 be-
recovered hGatnst him. The aidsvit sets 10Th III
defendant 81 nss u sod q1snlity Of stock and ab-
George H. Nehriy ss. same. This xaa similar
suit 10 the last, also commenced a,ainst JOHN u.
shanely to recover danla"et laid at $500 for home
sold 70 him June s5th+ 1SGs. On The nfHc,yit Of
Eli THOMPSON. xrcnt for complainant, a wr7t Of
capics ad respc,plenauza Issued. -
samuel " Johns rndJames ". Nawasth II.
Sns sdackeT. Creditor bill
Hants et, a]l ". Nels5p. This was an action OF
1Trp'Sv!n instituted ~ Tracy I. Harris. Joseph W
the firm Of Iarris, Hartley d Co. against Joi,n 4.
Neeon, sheriff Of the county. To recover possessIon
of qgan1l5 of dry goods saued ii T., ,0dI, calned
:. C1ncE1r coCR1-1Jort Hon. Era1ss i, uu-
lie,7s, Jadge.-1oS king u. bradley. Given 10
Catherine salter VI. John A. Sey*on- va-6,c,
lor the plaintiff and damages assessed at sa5 Mo.
ton BY defendant for new lr'aL
.Chance1y 41. 1f.*3 et Il y, Whiteuau ct ii.
Exceptions to Ma>ttrt report fled and ovesruled.
md On motion OF complainant, Masters report con
hr1ned and order for psrit1on-
james u. Recs. Thomas Church and Slanloy u.
TO Huakc The partition. ''''@S->''S''
In The matter Of John slcGraw, administrator of
GN ne se1s.e i q John Fleming Submitted 70 the
Bracaku T<. ZuttcrsneitIc4. Dismissed by
plaintiff attorney nj plaln1l1s casts.
HagenonfEeF ". huhuen ct ul. Demurrer 10
repIicatlun FLED. and demurrer overrued and
hY defendant and case given to inry.
when verdict was returned for the p!a!ntiH ani
sl7 astessed at ssaa.s5t Motion for new
Day vs. HaIly et al Proof OF sefrire upon
M,ehatl Raay and Mary Rady, and proof oi publ.
eation as 10 Michael BARNES md star Barnes, james
and Catherine Rcach his vile, Mich.el Hannin aud
Johanna hts w1fe, and Caherine Mccarthy. BliI
[a1en p51 1e11fsso q to Them A9*scrs Of James
gare1 nls vile, Patrick Turner and E1lea hIs Wife
David ConDerF Jeremiah connc1s Dennis II Mc{.arrhv
sGan s7 Cancr aod Mart his wife Daniel cras,n and
i En-t-