New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1866-02-02
Law IsrnLL,GnSCE..
IT., e,e~a .u,,o,.ermr~ Cave.


SUPREME Court ciRcr r---Brffe Juase GuBrRr.
! THE LAW GovESISG sPIcCLArloSs ~ IocEs, Ell,
T.aSdea, b. cufti' sst H. NAIii.-t and CL-rio' D.
This case, which has been on tidal in he SUI
usue Court g. Brooklyn foi several days past Il suit 70 re-.
sac q ,,o.-leid by 10 d-rnd,s,s for t.c plaintiff Tss
aetudsa'. .oehbos.r, ~ Msl't Ses or. ,.n.sl
sIirsa Of. eoaiaiprd ~ Ihe complaint were aarnr the
n,o'l. q h,by nsI,h .as Ap 49,, s.poySd ~ "
BIN he bai.ht order and dbeef them 70 Jur
CHASE nd I'D fir ain 5n6I b. sso'ISn .. 70 no sle "r
sr sihp.s esst on Inn value q 10 Il" - ps'sh--rd
2, .. aSsrr y, ah. H'1 p ssnSr si sf r.,
r'y On, IN % r, sss a. tss q,
tsa q any huc'nacu ~ Vie vafe o. TIE stock
whr ~ .asa. u.a,I 'sr e'',ss- Of p. p ~ 'gi
uIicr ,. lss-ems, sI ,,d. tho dseodssis pd'estd
,''- to- 49, .ss ss. 2. as s ps sss4 .
ees e P,sg, X. Il A;n APP s, ~.
~ g, % , ;s, sss, ys 4. he ss.s .sss .s
.y bal al BIZ. stock al sr-~iy d.frres,ed ssas
ths ar ~. n. a:;s asd sH p ss to-. Ihsy ess
cevng any sA,Io had been ronJsed 60 sh tho
ssh . Of % so n .n ~ ss ,5 nss
10 drfraad him Of h. right, -r Ivy ts> sab.su
value u the sock % sold w1soss sny ar-sion ii"s
hun he h. ,s.,iosi o-s to tie An9ant q $500. aa
TIE delsh.- Il otter had. leIsl' nat Va. ,,p
s.lea 70 .s seasgs: bs;Sssa ns AZ r. E:ss IN
hli when The s,yn cot ~ bout bi ,en'aei, e,
rive Linz icet
s ;ss d .s,,ss vs. s.s fs %
sss: ,h Eos sG s s4f sI 1rst.d'S s his
1.sen,i~ i. Jei~s eat upti' cus f.. ~ te'sed
~ e,,ss.v . y- c' 70. r e. 'ssss ON
a. deter 8.ataf. sh" c,iy >. s-~ fsit
o. he s f Ag l * ~ es "a 20 =, fSe
teps,y Led ompli .gso. me esmpa.n' 70 th'' sson
a a., &c s', IT,. q L. . .,Ss.
drpard. ss.sl,isil u g. wy so ma pe ise. y, ",
@ va ~. Ne H es i.Ai epsS tin ssepsa :.
Win lie dsitni-., 90 dc cor triton IA, hs would Do
l %,s q y e., 's u % s S' 10 g. POI
cent 20 he held BY them ~ msrrn TO cover sny los.
w y., 81 ~ .oel ne s by them anacrih, irln
tas Dis md farther edvaoce 81 ten per con- to be rd
S raj ,oust Of BeSls csUniy Lead .,o,t 10
srn,o account The plaintiff o. all m~. In tsrt bis msru
r,sks good; bot i'Ue 81 tho y 'ao - to % Tie
defendants rrses,ed tr ,igJt OF sI{ tyn ".s'ou, W.
81 ,iys Iia po..c- obsh- 5h o. April lSl 10 Is alleged
,htn s.rn gr o., .ha W. a KS
Is ss nsA. ossy Lead .heu il ~. yle.i.ea Of re
Ss ,,a !" s ~ s W.. ps s eaaist NJ
the dais aud wes ecrrecsrnsed ny otnsf Wv,
a,s.ss ths; the plaintiff TO teep the mrsh f"hd Az
tas, and in case d not Defendants reserved the rght
= .s Sq s ss snSg :S"s s% s ss ss 10 g. D.
nus very in pslss, stipulation sId Wy vs,,a sps
sn AZ gsni per- q s ,s -, .. Nm M. tp
HINT
sos.,ht upon ,hel 10 ssss Of .aisn dsps .pa ".
,aaf e fsa 5 S1 Ss p isiSij SRS ~ @
oe for r MY wears !. .sss t mo
@ W.. made u y. ja Ion ssdad .a, EN-: 20 .s
IND n the 1r. .a. saa w HSGs s' hey Do
g s s ,ns 'is as: -. S I'd SUCTION aud 6s
csssi by wash bs.e tsaies aie eoad.eicd ona pa m
hs purchase and q siesk thsy h.d rsY;', -.
pu.., AID .as q ihS s!e. and hsy, been irrsrsr
h.a Zee. s J nnu ,Soss an Gus. but Il not sa
prove thi ~ the pre.fnt case a. m.., o. 80, nv
sruc,d the jury ta, " shis ~ .iist
claimed sy +. 1ss s 10. 2; 3D. 5 y
was ior The jury sanios chat qaesticq IT,
Ses tho assnasa;. 90 bsci GU s!l lei ss. Its.s d.
sdants wrretbs ParobsTs OF ~. ,ost sna we ~
q ~ s :. a., sy S: sss1s - sss:
~ y,r sad pIss. Of seins II they ind thts the srrs
The PosOcs sss vs y Mr. ouIth = ". .ss rss - ~
va. an ,mp!e uo,iee air. Casts sddluon 70 M. fess
srss, ~. III. sdr,s u - bat ts ?, gsss's .
;. d.. ssnd stts .t
e ~. DAD So az s .s s ~ IN ,.I .s.
-, sos g.. Arrangement In regard - Tie bueAs Coan'!
Lead defendants I'll. was to o. 10 5e a
which also to be kept so"as ane H. mari Of M
s m, the margin 10 br psid asisdA. va ten peI ss.i 9
n Bczs Carty Lad wAlsa ny ~ .ssc
s r. ss I I'd ySss'' s =
pi,1 Il >, not part 81 TIE ssherI iufnaon 20 na,s 90
y sornr to instruct the jury that the paying o, sne 49,
III rinintn by defendant Constituted ssH,; 10 -
should instruct the Jury 70 ,ns IL was no ~
douce Of .atislsccn II had brc'i sisted On we This 90
fsndan, that By law W. , w., eop,a,psc