, 1866-02-17
THE KANE co. SEDUCTION CASE.
The Trial Continued-.-Summary ot
the MISUNDERSTANDING
Disclosures
lSpettal Cosrespoudepce Chicago TtIhuue,1

Especial Correspondence chicago Tsinunc.1
GENEvA. Knne Co.. Feb. 10.
Ine details ~ q ne evidence upon t1e psrt Of :he
ncsaueneres which It i paiofn1 to I!eteu 10. The
tndesencles IN the family circle Of the plaintiff,
wh,fn are new II ssnf;s ofpuone exposure are
yell he Stunned BY anJ one whose eunp1o,men
has drawn him within The purTtew Of the
court room; and ses there are. peF~ous-s
compulsory, who cit upon the eests of the people,
and occasionally, AZ some more po'n!cl proposition
Is advanced, ptess forward 70 the bar to catch In
every word Of tue story Of l1ceuuous Indulgence
and criminal eourses- Snch cases arc rarc d this
secton, and may il be forhiden OF Prusdeuce that
pes,len,tal bzea,htncs The halls 81 ja4isc Of our
Palr1a s,aie. The secaptutation Of thee4idcnea Of
this nay !. thing. tuaag1ne, forbidden by public
policy: The necessity may exist for tho hearing
ttnce the eaEe Is IN coasrt, but necessity demands
further publicity Of the mhutta. Ishsn. therefore,
content nyseh With statement in q lew 1nsdS Of
tbs nature Of the case which The testimony Of the
Witnesses presents-
The arst witness examined was LeHis Moycr,
resident Of The parish o( SaperElle during sco1e
q hs II Shs Tne
and Mary. the atter beins tNice married. under the
es1s Ct The PLAINTIFF that he might SEQ them saie,
Daniel 4 Caltins, now resident in VIII county,
Was next sworn. He testified he on one occasion
heard bis wife haNusSconseuted TO settlement and
he thou2ht she had no hight, snepectine, as Nr,1
1ao ssat .oi b!nl lna! AlteIn9m, N1en his
VII ie'tt sne nao na0 = nauo m oelplns - NE
n,r o. ~ tas @ pspE2, pEs acs e9unaS!nng "lte re
nuEtne n ssaTrh for II. ~ VIZ ha dlscorasaG NJ e
t3setIoE siete" nnt. ~ ~ Ss.s NJ ~
~ the evenino NJ II nA,aA .a ,aaes
! Mr, IN sacnTa sac,asv and 1"'iu - tRos .on
rasde conditions n ahsre hertarors snhs.~nc1 ~
sha demanded of hnn fsn bfs thnre nf H. e1nc,sc
attending 4 sickness. He naid her III aul hsi III
| furtber }f1tlmacy with her He accountets for hls
tenarati0n ror h1s wife by siatfne IA, there was
m1ilua] jealouaJ and On his side the vile prpbab1y
| had cause
| David SttieEer implicated bY the testimony n1
| the pjalntIfI7s daughter was then swoFu Ills tes
tlmouy implicated seven men. heads Of families II
I improper fpumacies, az it did also himself, D3
tectirr one almost in The act LED to offers tor him
self and be was not elow 10 ayai, hfrnself ar tba
| nnyileees accorded hin, And these ,ntirnac,es
seem 10 have extended flom 1856 to 1861 Fhon tf,
Wings enlisted in the A3th Nifnofs infuntrY' H.
he coprre of il be had watched nsaa coln9 ~, -.
house. and be Ind conseraed With .;..Ea, -. az
V}fe coneelnipe her 1nddel!ti- ne p.anna ~
detc:;s easend,ue. be now developed, thel M
IL itMaa- ,eT The st1 Ast yeara Of her llfe
mo rIt ~ 5oan Iosa. VINO Has ofo'isat n o.
.s,.,naJ ~ - asamen .I tssHeo yes9erua{; was tae1
| sA1148eo ~ Lae pal' q tne Plainu1- Ills lestlno
~ W. mste!y 70 ine enect that PC nag nc!er see1
" ueaeaoaat .h e sn!o tao Esiaenee Or plaint1n
M!e,-"aa 'pat " aao pe1es seeo atn III tnat siein
iiydi. ,tr3rker Tho a,,s.t a.,oh 10. =, ,,o ,-,t
,ets e.. s eagat uauentel o. tne VIZ
mo hee ras ss1es M ~ ~, ~ nas
t41k nEe tupPNEA.u1 ho"esS1- Ot VIE platAt1- @l.t