The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1866-11-25
the ALLEGED DIsTIlLeRY FRAUDS.

singular Statement of she Com pIa innnt-
The Case 81 Inspector Dcvlin--Additional
Seizures, &c.
Before Commissioner Newton.
The examination OF the alleged bribery OF Wilson ara
Gocbne continued yesterday morning.
TESTIMONY
NY name Is Isaac McNulty; was partner OF Mr. Sohn
n Wilson in disticry; Mr. Cochue visited distery
in the month OF August three times as can
ber he inspected disey affairs and
acconnts made thorough investigation Of them.
The District Atorney-I have talked with Mr. McNulty
this morning. if the Commissioner please desired be.
taking the responsibility Diminishing this case 10 have
his evidence sworn 10 In court His evidence satisfies
that Mr.. Wilson did understand the facts stated that
AFFIDAVIT when he made y and not Of what he
win eIoneIstes the olcer far the main charge
he did visit and make the usual
examinations am therefore Induced from the
the subject think 4 Is bu right and proper to press
The CommssIonerTben understand that your part.
NJ psr1s, Aorn.y yoa consens to dismiss tho whole
Dstrict Attorney-yes.
District Attorney think The question in tho
da sss Sny action tn. could Ss and from
Mr. COchue and MI. Wilson wer. then discharged.
The Inspector B. Tton .aia 70 be brother
sa Ss's sSa
s va. .s al s M so S s,s IN .p BY
chased by anbseausnt 10 Sep
pese he o.
Mr. Tsppan called. and ,estined Is iollow.:
9. Ss he d S
E. s S mr. p. .n S %
l,on have had the for the most Of ,he time
Dew many IL t . as to ao% MI n
was introduced a. broker OF spirits for bssn
and himself we have no requests file FROM Mr. Dein
he. ssp1s from Pe,.
Collector and the Collector SAID he had before
l, had never been fled have tina. with me; paper
IN The ssfe; 1--WE or three week. ago when
once and put in spseon hole which osehsue when
jerks objected to the paper being put in evidence. on
the ground THAI The paper was no, shown 70 have been
The District Attorney con,snded paper should re
received, because IL should form strong portion Of the r,i
Jents oop,ended hs, N. paper could portion
tee either The cosei.r or the DEPUTY s
The D:,,e. Attorney stated mat his obiee, was show
for Mr. Devn; that Mr.. Devin had made application
The commsson-r ruled PAPER Was sdmisssbi- in
evidence and y wa. then ra.d u was foasl .ppilsson
70 sspe%Ssr IT'S : ''i %" "-" 'e''s" '''''
ss. sp prior Sss 60. sa ss A'
w,.ness here proanceS nnme.r o. order, whta he
M % Of s
w1 w IN osds, ,es as Of q.or o
The District Attorney hen offered IN evidence the applies
oseeton va. msde by the defence and the paper
The reiurn or Mr. Triton va, .h.n road 10 evidences. u
certified TO-. he bad .nspeeed 'b srrrs OF enor Tor W.
never ssve any d.ron fos n. inspection OF this liquor
The col.ior ,hs IL, OF sepi.mSsr established the
that parties must MAKO written sppllesoos accompanied
ssp'snbsr less never MI rion any iu.rae oa,
=. a no q o ri oa Me- sa zoe s
day 70 dss, ana had snowI-dss ina, M Triton
from DAY s r.' Of
duty on IL. reesps Of n. order was aiseesoo. ~ de
nsno. con sdenee was s.s e ,se inspector. hs hey u.s.
rules ~ tho cnlce for the Of the inspectors In
sdidsvt and application 10 Sir rion myself se snde e.
a.. o no EVAN s .S" . asvss. o"i
don't know wha, LevxIs bnslpss - never spok. To him
sppaoa w.. %.d- ~ W. ,.n
and seton taken undsr IN shs same msuner ~ rnd-s sn
M. Pred. sochue peI, sworn ssd testified toi.
psriment; on The morning Of a.. a Of osIobep be-
.ss pS snd s a." s' o ios To-.
there thea inside ! saw Two loads, q VS. IN Hudson
wen, 70 % see -hA. they doing Nj rllon vas there
sssa WIN s soos and panel y b.. hand md was .sss
other eh s around the brands in the hands Of
hunted barrels. ss% s.w M sn sas the n aS
srrs o. tue psrres on book sna saw msn usnf i'ohs
NJ ripn. ~ Dsyeiln snd rour others present
IA
front OF the door, Zach Of ths into he
bad sr barrels on hem each marked With chsk marx
~. they unosded IN the street, aud the whskey
rolled into The yard VAS 10 the yard about hye minutes
after the bsrr.is In tell xneihey III. bar
rels which being branded the barrels saw
M did not see the nb-r ~ barrels which were tsndd
Witness here described TIVE premisrs The bWiiiug
stable - fce By is ,~rniy feet squsre and Two 40
hgh, thrrr other building that vicinity ia
which liquor could he used there every indication that
hsd Deeu used -ttshOnsr fOr Liquor, Johs Dew
I'm At thtt place hund ed times prior subs-
aneo, 70 the time 80. the barrels 70 Ia Know Mr. Le,so.
he the ssent tor Mr. Dsyln. kios: Mr. Dew
lin IL an agent tor selling liquors from other di-'ilees
At thus stage Of The pocrengs the ufth-r hearing -.
po.tpuDed "a i The 3ist Inst Twelve ".
ASofHEa
On Friday night about eleven O'Clock, inspector Fred
Cochuc seized twelve barrels ~ vhsksy wheh were br
conveyed into Crtbbert Cnnnn CHAM. d-llerv. on Frs
svee hetwern South foafia aud south Fifih streets b
The llgnor supposed 81 have been removed from ths
Western District spd esrtsd 10 tue Forty
rtaiien house. The barrels wer~ branded - follows
Nanu aiured prior 20 sept 1885 A. Phillips second
distre N ". Inspected ~.pt-mber 1888 tht~ morning
lnspsctcr Phl p Visited tho station aud seeing
The brand plonvu need II q counterfeit oss.
nksNt c0uer