New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-10-23
SUPREME CoURT-Cmcun-Ocr s2-Before Mr. Jusilco
DAyis
SUIT TO RECOVER PoR LOST BAGGAGE.

SUIT TO RECOVER FoR LOST BAGGAGE
John oConneT sgt The Central Amccan Transit Company
The plaintiff brings suit 20 recover about SllOo,
which be alleges the value Of baggage that he nrqcd 70
defendants board OF one Of hgr vessels 10 which no
upnblo To- md and deliver him his arrival here The
psuiif testified his behalf ard his an,vcrs 70 questions
although had been carrier before leaving New lork
for california he had become mbued hes IN diie iot
which he paid s0 but IN answer 10 question: by The Court
he said he paid q each fr lcm TINT BE- lough coats pal
&C. at eXtravaguni prices that &c paid sJ o an o'erooH
The dd1se IL thn plaintiff did no, comply with the rules Of
tie Company relation the management Of BIZ, agsngN
giving them Information in relation thereto nnd ~ eq,e
Z sStTayssSai Case sl Ar james Mckee Tor plaintiff
M Randolph for defendants
Thomas j. Ropes at Tie BANK Of Albion ct nl
In Ills case already reported the Court dismissed tho
nOIEL FEormETuNs ~ THouBLE
Aus,ute oyer agt Lindcnstruth q Klohe.
TIE defendants hotel proprietor Plaintiff became their
guest IN ~, and boing unable payhs bill helce property
clothing jcvclry fancy articles &c IL ccd that nih
al, - deliver him liz goods vo dcsndanis IN
their answer contend that The oa goods e By plaintiff vas
The me hs paid his BAN they admitted the is- that
mattress wss also lo, BY painful Tsca sLy sdrsIiiseu N
In our weeks would be Kept BY them Plaintiffs counsel
corieHdd that these goods were IN hs mattress " tick Yer
j. II B9sa Tor plaintiff T1codS,, sigyys,aTt for an,
RIGHT TO TIE PUBLIC sIhEEIs-hAY osB RAILROAD
COMPANY USE AsorTIEEs IRAcKs-AS OLD CASH.
Railroad John and others John
Kerr & Others sgt the Sixih-sye. Rslfoad Co
These suits have up before and been reported IN various
form Pe, y eoIs up 10 ne torn o. aoni o e
pa claim at under the act authorizing them 20 10y rails they
have rghf to si1h.avc track whore their
iucde. They claim too mat ey were ID no case Doh1 70
ma he compensation beforehand and that the statute having
pointed out the method In which compensation to bs
settled they arc not bound to pay IL untl the compensation
was settled IN that manner
On the other hand he plaintiffs, The sirihave Railroad
Company contend that the terms hch they permitted
10 lay their rails and their very oncfous TO the
keeping OF the road bel and running OF etc and amounted
10 contract and implied the paIt Of theCiy Government
and Legislature condition TINT their labor and materials
cars f the carving OF passengers Tor hrby other parties
Thoy admit the right of the public gcneral their tracks
The Broadwaand seyenthaye Railroad Co. haze night 20
their property or at all events the Le.lainre ea5no,
without compensation 10 be- paid beforehand They
therefore ask Injunction against the defendants 70 restrain
them from running their cara on the broadway portion OF their
tracks
Junction dissolved the Goth Of August 1883 from which
an appeal taken TO the General Term and the order dis
royiRg The injunction sustained Mr. Justice Iugraham dc.
The case now up on regular trial and SIr Burr
yesterday presented his argument embodyng In an extended
The argument behalf of the defendants will be presented
Mr. Burrl for Plaintiffs M.ssB Robinson scrbner and
Charlie. O Conor for defendants
CIi,MnTRs-oCr 2a-I,ofore Mr. Justice Blnpoun
HAD CONFEDERATE MONEY ANY vALUEl-A CURIOUS DE.
PENsE
Robert Eager agt Lemuel Hayward
This suit promssOry note made by te defendant
one Attr aud Endorsed the plaintiff The defendant
sets IN in that the note made
feae money by various Of Congress this currency
was declared worthless and such transaction void and
The plaintiff moved strike out this rs frivolous
Arguing that Confederate currency had the note
was made though money such value the motto
when il had passed into the hands Of u third IAry.
The Court reserved Its decision.
Calvin a Lay for plaintiff q. II Glover for defendant
THE BISHOP DIVORCE SUIT.
Bishop hgL Bishop
The Plaintiff in this asks for aimony alleging her
moving papers the defendant 10 worth 10000 and IL In
intercourse with for vhose board be pays cas- per
week while the plaintiff IL destitys Of means The de.
PENDANT on the other hand entirely denies the charge against
him and charges that plaintiff temper solely 10 blame
that during three contracted bills for
sIes Al and elsewhere which 10 him and
which he an aggregate smouni Of nearly " 600 and
other bills which would swel ths amount u 600
done this 10 ruin him. and has had cad published the papers
In references this s for the same purpose thai far from
being worth 800 900 he htoVsnt With Judgments now out
against him. and that bs income from his business
originally So, 70 has been greatly reduced BY her published
stafsusns diving Of old and interfering with
transient business He claims that under these orcums
she Il not entitled 10 any slimouy
The Court took the pagers and reserved I've decision.
ASEouScKkKSf ny Me- JUSTICE BARNARD.
vsh 10 give notice 10 the bar that In view Of the great
pressure chamber busnets and Of s delay consequent upon
here being but Judge appointed 10 thu, class Of bun-
that shall during part Of the year whom appointed
hold regular chambers it from 70 10 IN the morning
chambers In some ooEvenisnt In She City Hall
particularly for The purpose rssVg that portion Of the bar
who NAV have In Courts at and amer 10 O'Clock
We trust and indeed doubt that durng parts
Of year we are by sppointmsst s regular chamber
sons one o! our usuosa and puhaps more s viii ass