New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1866-03-14
Tl,e courts.
Gases Set for Trial This Day.

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
United States VS.. VIM. Nelson--United State:
Attorney. Roselius.
James L. Lovejoy vs. N. Richards admins
trator-Henderson, Jr. Durant & Horror.
Carney Emley & Co. vs.. Thos. Ong-Durant
Hornor. Torrey.
Moses Thompson VS.. Augustus Lesseps-J. N
Lea.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.
United States VS.. steamer Cuba-United States
O'Neal vs.. Red River Packet Company-Robin
son. Earhart.
SUPREME COURT OF. LOUISIANA.
Francis Laeroix VS.. F. N. Coeler-Tran Rose.
Illus.
Pierre Gallot VS.. Thos. McCloskey-Fellows &
Mills. Redmond
Mrs. NJ. Ryan VS.. E. W. Sewell-Redmond. Du-
A. H. Pray VS.. P. Hebert H. Baer-Runting-
ton. Bright.
Succession of Daniel Sheean-Durant l. Hor-
nor Lacey, Bright. Koontz.
Introduction Of Rosette Rochon, J. Bull admin.
istrator, appellant: j. H. Savage & F. Buisson,
appellees--Castera. Duplantier & Buisson
Pierre Longis VS.. his creditors-Roselus Magne,
Iissot. Huntington.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
Succession of 7. B. Observation-Disclosures. Brad
ford, Lea q Finney. Roseluis g. Phillips, G. L.
Bright.
Emile Lasere VS.. John Lacaze-Cambrav.
Succession of E. ". Sewell-Rawle. Burgess.
R. J. ker, test'y executor, VS.. J. R. Shannon
Eggleston. Fellows & Mills.
81. Varillat vs. Plauche-Lacey. Castera.
Egee vs.. Elgee-Hyams & Jonas: Spofford.
Roselius & Phillips.
Martha Campbell VS.. N E. Bailey and wife
Morel. Buchanan Il Gilmore.
THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
@ RULES.
Sharer vs.. Bate-SheIdon & Pardee
Soulie, syndic, VS.. Mrs. Sauyage-Grandmont
Castera.
Holland VS.. Gros-J. D. Augustin. Wenck
M. Bownin vs. Dr. J. Elliott-Sambola & Ducros.
Dugue & Bright
J; NJ. Looming VS.. P. Nonque ct al.-Redmond.
Mrs. y5entriss VS.. W. R. Hodges-Lacey Blu
chanan & Gilmore
R. j. Ker, executor, VS.. J. W. Wilder-EggIes-
,on d Huntington. Bright, Whitaker, Fellows &
s. Stuart VS.. J. Enderlin-Tissot. Van Dolson.
Larrien vs. his wife-Tran. T. J. Walton.
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
Martin Jones VS.. Jacob Morley ct Campbell
3pottord d Campbell, T. W. Collens. Emerson 4
VIM. B: Scott & Co: VS.. VIM. Bailey-Hyams 4
Tomas. Sullivan, Billings & Hughes.
Joseph Israel vs. N. Levy-Augustin. Beden &
Euselier.
City of Baltimore VS.. Houillion-semmes h Mott
-.,..-
Hammond & Co. and P. McAnliff VS.. New Or.
cans, Jackson and Great Northern Railroad Co
Buchanan Gilmore, Mari & Foute. Hays Il
Adams.
CASES
J. B. Cunningham VS.. Kohn & Kelley-Howard
2ezier.
E. Echelberger VS.. steamer G. A. THOMPSON ct
l-Tissot. Race, Foster & E. 7. Merrick.
J. Kaiser VS.. H. G. Carson eft als-E. Hestand. |
Hunt Denegre.
i. 9. Aacharison vs.. Roder 81 Gott-semmes g. |
iott. Whitaker Fellows & Mills.
John Eaton, syndic, vs.. Bancroft Gherardi-Van |
)olson. Clarke Bayne.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT.
RULRs
Mrs. Brulenger VS.. R. Rousselot and Recorder of
lortgages-Derbes.
Croeller Hazel q Morton VS.. Comeggs Daning |
y al.-Bermudez. Elmore & King, Day.
CASES.
Jutler, Bard, A. Miller. ''
Robert W. Wooley VS.. Atlantic and Mississippi |
steamship Co.-Harrison g. Hunton. Hunt & |
)enegre.
Charles G. Spencer VS.. Stevens & Bro. Bright
ratum.
Hersch Adler.vs. Maurice Langhorne, ct all
decay. Whitaker, Fellows 4 Mills.
curator ad hoe
Albert speyrs VS.. Theodore Pincus-Bright.
itoche & Howe.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
Widow j. S. Dufossat vs.. G. L. Deschapelles-
J. =. Schmidt.
CASES.
G. Chism VS.. Herwig Brother-Hewes Tissot.
'eo. w. 0livel vs.. Charles & W. Hodges-Morgan
New. Taylor,
Harvey and wife VS.. L. Potter-Saucier. Rose.
US y Phillips. -
J: Coleman ct ais. VS.. J. Labarre, ct a1s.-Du-
ant Il Horror. Robert.
John S. Hamilton VS.. E. Marx-Harrison &
huntington.
Al. Powell VS.. Jonas Pickles-Hunt & Denegre.
ingleton & Hardie.
w: Q. Denegre VS.. 7. D. Van Horn, syndic-
lnnt, Bradford, Lea & Finney.