, 1866-05-24


mtning which Of the aCcE Gary Gnd J. d Jirns-
supER1oht oht.:7us.,cks.-Qulmby e. 81 Va Bo,sforu
IL IL ntal cruyneueed when pl,intits elect 10
nj attornsy, sun aistait.ea si plaiaii1's eosg:
attorney. u,snissea Al p,s,a, III : costs.
Br1 ant W. Grand Trunk Railway Company. BY
ac1emcnt. order ef 1he lih inst: is,otssiuf cau.e
81 side snc rause rt.nststrf ~ i'm docket anif
rnn1inued pntij the October isrm
csrry "a. tauns, On mot1ou or p,aintiy.s at1or.
nev stit di-InIs. ed AZ pta1u III 4 cosr
t1,rref ys Nnr1hy Ey aryu.uent sa1t dlsmtss
eafn SopahGe p IS DAVIS unpiesasd, etc, On motion.
oide;cndaut's attorney suit dismissed for want Of
pt2st e1uou =, " ~ S1,.i Nv eourt IN n1ea of
t,efcndsnt Dsyerev ou]y. Finding foc platnli9 anu
dsnscf. ns.esssI az sssa MoIion fpr new ttial
os seE.a?.r ', Teu,,e,on. No.ton for uev rial
snIamertR HIHS SI Roa Rorien.a On re,ziIct. '>'
W,i1isn,s ~ - a,c.ssn. M Tr,af hv ,rrv v.n,,ct
so. n,a,n.,y sr5 ,tansas. ..srsa.d Al 1!aa m Wu.
t,nn ~, pta,I iar new iT7a1 bx fs.tsutl,n:. ~
III DroNpys. or. Va Roe BOG Is. Cau,e cou,Iuucd- .. -.-.
:, pp NJ n1.,nnM. cosR a.
,iarfi,s W. Prfies I+lai cou,msneAi. Plaintiff
elects 10 tako pon-snlt. - ~~'&
e1oeR1s sn,t u Etanssin a. H. no,nn If n,,u-
tGs at,aiasy: III Dismissed =. p,sia,,a ses.;:
NM Esii1oad Cnmnsn1. On nos,on Of nlstntidss
atln1Nnv an s,it t,sns.ej st n ,,nl1a tn.t
t, @ 's.ts ". w. nna es,,t d,rasa ; Apa
tos pIypsk'J aau oao T9h,aa Ss9k naa; I'd, n.
TO, poa pE canrt e. H. ~ o. ." 'e' oo"a l''
ne call for to-day ennbfaeea tho f0tlo wing
a. F,,-,ar,,s y. o,Rsf,1v
ai r. ME-, 6laa 1s .yoho.nn H. noo5'
e r. 1tai.ea W. rs III. :,
Y GupP ". Adans ssh
- -. laaa asfpsl .s, sams. a.nss
16! netzog ". Seiaon.
~. % kasson ss. BAKER. l.vau
loa. kumBey = al vs. Grand Trunk Railway CO.
Io-moHoT ttndasl y toe Ia,t day 1os no'ee1nS
aser iof IIal n tlls coaIL ,v,
AsD S.an-WIoinm W. Masaran,. T. Ials ,l..s,as We
WarcEum aaatnsr her husband. Laurentius y.
Wafazun1, 10 oota9 asefcr oi qltofeT UPON .oe
p1s!at .sts ionh Lat conplsinsni in!s.aarrt-d
~'h the dekenaant ~ & 1ae hinGdom q Norway.
on H. 9.n o. Aps aa; aaS "a neo "!,n 1n,.a. nia
During thts long term VI married ll,a ten chill
dfen nave Deen ' 9oin nnto H. pafu9:. pas 9hly h
oai 10! ss has nj.
q nahltual arunkenne:s' snd % lnat aastns Susa
.ns hs has ~ WhonT afu, nsseGaea sc anh te1nssa 5
10 ploslue ZOE oe contH1ae 10 Tue mala1enInee
OF his wife and family. ,,, ,,,,,-
Hiehae! A. G!lien ss. WMlam ". wilson. ap.
peal oJ p:amtn lfqm laueMent ior costs otueied
~ Jnr!lca us"0tI on tae slst in-t;, IN an action
!oE osc1ois DetaAuc5v insttaeeo a1tanst ue-
ie4Saa!, ,.ru,,
1aa feopls - r;o fit1xesu. appea. ~
sustlfe llafifs MepGnnsn On tae "a sas!ant: aE-
John Kea1ins,
n,,,n n, = see G ~ tynen ral, Anpea y y
Jnst.es 7. aTovn on ,hs sta io.!ant IN suit IN
sEIateu ~ .1e MaJ @ agal97t ~ ue'euonut.
diew ss'S aansi Aciion q a.sanpsie 70 'eso1er &c yer
damages !a,d At &, ,500 PfRctp@and bond for costs
In1
James Cray. AeiloH OF. assumpsit 10 recover
damages lid at Ssoo. ffse!Ps only on Me.
Aornce " hlttemose noDeft D. "nltteHofe, sohn
ana William c. Mccosmick. Action Of aasnmp-tt
70 recover damases !ald az saa. upon oal or
Eooos.
james g. Aeelay md John Il kedzie v. Betty
Maes1su!eg. snn Asuo4 81 sssuopsh t9 recover oam'
damages W ia,d u s,a similar amount Pxs!pe and
ocT1 Ms ,os cos's ;, On us xf ,ns,.. ., r.,h M,
Hannah Lonsa sacksti, Waltee y ,scxst1, unbafi
>. SaeEett. George =: saekelt ttsdssick sac3stt
N ma can ns nsw io'S 10 hts m cr s ~
insurance upon the ne Of Ed*n nrd Saeks.t, since
Geeesea+ ~ III ~ sets usa aas rue ae.
eeasea u his lte ume elected 40 ln,ufapee 10 the
q fnia policy % compsin.nt ior he ssnsar d 6is
thrse sons, The defendants Hobart >. GEORGE b.
ceased, ,hs defendant aannlh l. 5acket1 was ap-
pointed adu1ni>ratt11 OF lne estate ana dosepo =
Otls. aamasstaSs, ~ mhen sa p1Gy. ..s anea:; o.asi
Is now he'll W them.
c1nCUH couKr OF cooK CouNTT.-Bgore Hon.
E1assM - .. ,.4 !rataas' 'a1Se.-Gnnen rs aous'nsEf
Nansom w. Richards. Cause continued.
prtsht et. ii. ". hughes; ,uo.nilsed to Court
-! Whitney u v: fhioSp. 9 %eoathusd
Sose ". Wetrhew. continued b. aeresmens Of
psriiss.
Mn;onev Va. stiles ct al, Continued on dsfen-
"aI a,rnt = ~ w. icsro Prnet1cs: Psnt,np Conn
psnyt Cause cor; ipued.
3s;sSa sntis cosfa s,,6 nre.1e,H tor want az ma
esntinn.
Ereunau ys, Ia Bar ot al. Caase continued By
agreement. .,,. 7,..,. cu..,s.. e.,
,os,Is 70 rnnrt h. Agreement. tury Beng vs,yei.
Finding fof pia,nti1 Fos Ti1o, aud ln,lgmeut or.
q 'fspdn s Ang ,a,s ID
Nmteli ". WrfrilL Submitted to court Tor trial
by agteenent, ]uEy being waived; s, :.
hesbs: ~ ". &c cu1psnaham Ct al. Suit dismissed at
% slsK et Il. " Clark W ct - al Dismissed at plain.
| tId-s costs.
| Dean IS. Geeuan. Submitted. to Court for trial
sos sna a5a. ane paM ssseassd a Juaemsat a.
dnd1urs md excep;ions ~ defendant. Appe i
/ PRAYED and aIowed bond 10 be died within taI1ty
i md hlli Of excenti,ns vfithiu s,1Iv dayt,
! james, cotonrr etc II. nylman es al. Contin
ned on defendant, application at defendant COSTS
II.tv n Resd. T.1sl bY iurv. Yenijct returne1
for naiutitr: ana dapaEes assessed ul SiOi,Gs,
I ,ind.,mect nriered On verdict.
Tsstsrusy he Court Completed the call Of TIL
caierdar In thls court for tie april term, Their
! wfti consroncn " bc no en- to-dsy.
The follow Ing mot1on docket, embracing cause
In wblct mo1ons ior new ifiait have BEEN entered
Vii be called Tomorrow Fridayl motnlug
/. Ei-Birch et ii, IS, Far, Attachment. Nc
tim Eor new friaf hr fefrndant AoriI 1;Itb.
! I71-utIa ". Lhlcag0 CIfy Kall@u7 COMPANY
cn.e Mn1,on by deienIant Februsry 3Slh,
49eERouuds IS. Gllotrt ct al, Appeal By d
ts5nt Wni,nT ~ ofnfnt ;tr sfarrh 1efn