New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-06-19


owner Of the steamship Dakotah Tie evidence taken was
substantially as follows:
Of the Dakoah and ran that steamship Mobile IN Janns
last that he had sold her to his brother be made eon'e.
the vessel for Sl2O the pepefs were Lett with bis Awye
in Escrow be delivered when the money paid drah
given by Reddy the firm OF Reddy & Fuller in Ph
adepha OF which he represented himself to be smemcF Wit
ness gave that draft TO J. W. Elwe and Endorsed IT,
sent on for collection and returned proested witness "A n
know whether there any such firm, except from kadd
jones' that the ship could not sail until the repairs pd
for; and that Reddy mad paid 81 900 - wel Coz Ewe
to Reddy; witness gave mortgage Ia Mr. Elwe 70
him for the advances he had made Mr. eddy bad no author
ITS to any ownership the vessel dram given by
Reddy his board had he had heard zen protested Red
entire stranger to me until about week cre the
Transaction those bills against the ship; was the cole
owner and Mr. Elwe my agent; te bills charged
personally against me- and there il credit to me 81 oo
paid by Charles Reddy he told me the reason why The dram
protested because Mr. Fuller had his money oil lied
up The mortgage made before the vessel sailed The first
VIM W. Jones the captain Of the vessel Dakoioh testified
that in January the vessel here intending To sail
various parties furnished her with suppes Capt couds
furnished provsonsi he could gay who purchased The
rest Mr. Elwei the agent Of the ship and the bs we're
made him; there young gentleman introduced t
him Lelands house in Thirty hi6s OF the q ed
the Friday or Thursday night before the ship saed Ny
Leland informed him that be Reddy had purchased nrh
Of The ship Dakotab for SIP oo Mr. Leland said he aa taken
bogus that after Mr. Reddy left; the WHY
tSat he understood tnat sr keddys ors Tor go %
written directions from Mr. Leland Mr. Leland told that
Delaware, Dut that must win
stop long enough for the sheriff TO
and prevent the steamer going TO sea-
On toe 9th Of January he had heard that Geographic
muucation had been received from Philadelphia that Reddy
& Fuller bad no funds 10 meet the draft
Judge Connolly excluded all evidence Of privileged
ncaon and objected receiving evidence Of thai can see
Mr. Dodge contended that crime being involved the rrv
Witness continues In the afternoon day Reddy
and Mr. johnson came to the ship on visit; informed Mr.
Reddy that Mr. Ewe desired him bis cognr, ionse
there telegraph the country house Judge Connolly
That was in writing was i mott ad not hear TIC con
seen dispatch asked Mr. elcy what should do for
pay the ships bills; Mr.. johnson said II cO or
would advance il. gadge Connoly.Mr Johnson seems
volunteered TO advance the money Mr. Dodge-ies s bat
on @%ls and man don't bit what tho rr
your case goes the weaker It 50 witness cont'nues-
bank hours and Mr. johnson went and got the money
banded it 70 Mr. Rsddy Mr. Reddy gave 1t to me and
of the disbursements OF the vessel which have
Judge ConnoyI does not be that Won making
any intent to deceive. II was voluntary offer on MI
@ es. 9S nd Oasy sS sas ea % e o
cept given him BIZ the captain payment Of his boar bill
and Tor bis credit for this money aud that this part
Witness cOntnue.I said Johnsons presence that Rsddy
was orc fourth owner AID that his brother going
purser on board ship never had any suspicious az
character OF connected with this ship or that there
New.Yofk; Mr. Reddy said il 70 Mr. johnson that
the money would be paid in three days subsequently heard
Mr. LELAND at the Metropolitan Hotel that be was moTsy
bat not legally bound to pay the money.
Judge Connoy-I don't what this has to do VIII the
Mr. Dodge-I make charge. your Honor, against VIM W.
Leland.
out You must show that there was some completely
between him aud AR. Reddy. ,.,.,.-...
ing II NOT here, before another forum
Warren Leland was next and testified tina, no .a
Mr. eddy the hotel last Winter that he kueT nothing o.
him. be- Reddy gave him draft Of $500 on Reddy and some
body e payable at S ss fn &c, n.
present the Dakotah though he was at one TINE
having acquired the title by transfer rom Els potner
O. What did you pay for herr A. What agreed to give
Judge Connolly oyeruled question Mr. Dodge Insisting
that competent to show frad and completely on hs
part Of VIM. w. Leland with Reddy IN the matter win
view Of obtaining criminal process against Leland. question
Witness knew nothing any transactions between Leland
and Reddy the latter aud johnson otherwise nan nom
Horace s Leland testified that Rsddy to the hotel on
the h Of December and occupied paror and room Of s 20
per day and the Al Of January presented the 500 dr A.
the Office in payment Of his hotel BILL and on ne on s'snsa
70 do on the sth Of January learned draft had been pro
tested further testified that Reddy brought hin Tue re-
& which tben amounted 10 about $780, which was taken
security. and which he now held by iien'
Judge onnoy stated that though this seemed 10 bel
fragrant Of procuring money unfairly yet there ad no.
pear be enough TO hod the accused Iaere msn' oc
thing for the action Of grand Jury.
L. ". Dodge attorney Tor compiMsatt'
SUPREME CoURT-CIEcUrr-JuSE ls-Befcre justice
GROVER
A CO-PARTNERsHIP DIFFICULTY
Vim. II. Goodwin agt. Marquis ID. j.. Sharkey.-
The psntif brought this $4,000 hom %
fcudan this amount being half OF TIE prohts on oeSe
transacted nv tue defendant in his name but the paul.
a that there has been an understanding that these ohs
were to be divided equally between hi@seI aho 49, ~
ant The plaintiff alleged that in the Fall OF is6 he made
with the defendant that the latter should iaks
store and manage tobacco business u n own naue, ~,
nlsjnf ha. 10 furnish necessary TO carry on ".
business and the profits accrung from certain sarcusr
actIous were be divided at the expiration OF nns ,e
the time the agreement made; the time wouu raw -
in The Fall of s6i Tse plaintiff also allie sed that for some .
nreyious 10 the ofhis alleged
o osss IN 's me firm name Of Good Brother M
sharkey was the business at the same time on, e I
solvent and would have been ruined u the pninuh 10"
given him pecuniary aid thereby enabling MN 70 , M,
lures the profits OF which were mutually shared me s~s
ug nher alleged that the aggregate amount ci pyl
vested Iy him IN these transactions In the negspcl
OF ST. 100000 and that the defendant oSy @''iata TX
no interest in the business takng refuge IN @ , Ssr,
had been that the business n1 o,aye ~
| acted In his name, ara tnat 'he ou's'"0 WV"
To ali these allegations the defendant denies s IN
agreement made. and AYERS tna' .a rare
exclusively his own and transacted by hin IN HIS
Case % az Gardiner and A. j. vanderpo and VIM tSH
ton for plaintiff Martin & Smith and H. W. Aous"'o" "
ie"uaH, eu.unyRs-JrSE ls-Before Justice ISoRArAA
| DECISIONS =, -,
| Amos l.. Story agt. Chas. l.. Branch.-n'"'''
deheo Before Justice CIERKE. .
rhos i Little aet United Oh Land Company e. al ~
notice Of settlement before at Chambers on Mon"s'
| Tuesday at 10 ocack a. m. -. ~ a
Andrews agt FIeelaad.-Papers for counsel Win Goa
Chambers ,.
Iemuel Valentine sgt J. *. tdtheii -peienu"ns I'd
guilty OF contempt OF Court and dned the AMOUNT le
aud ESQ.
! UNITED STATES COMMISSIONERS offiOh-''"
49, BEFORE Commissioner BETS.
THE FRENCH EXTaADrioS CASE. -;
In the matter of the extradi,ion OF oureau 80 ~.
randeThs case adjourned TO to-day put ow,1s ,f.r
ndsposon OF Mr.. Clinton The prisoner eoah ~, .a
examination Was adjourned to II o'clock next hop''S
! ing
COURT CALENDAR-Tns DAY, al,
SUPREME CouRT-CIRcuIr-far i:--N 90 "a - "a
ooe go osa lt1 1881 1896 1871 ISL 1867. 81 ~ - -
-, 80 Ll-NOs. no e6 4.o -