The daily clarion. [volume] (Meridian, Miss.) 1863-1866, 1866-03-04


'''''' mn mann - ~
|Chlei Justice Handy delivered the opin-
OF the Court
ms was q G"thiHahheHb ISSUED on luug-
MT I'D IaFoI OF the defendants III error
aiH7t Henry T. LlIeJ. administrators OF
seph L. biiggs. upon winch the pIantIit
.itoi was summoned rs 9ahlshee. 10
AtiIi Term OH thc 1heNJ Court oil tIal-
."e county, 1901, Inc proceeding was IN
tHjed under articles %I5 and 81, Revised
la Dbl ana Is III conformity 10 th"se pro
.,. IA. P'"Il7S W,'s -9, ~ - on sLSSes,
va "a ''i' ~ - TT 'lil''
IT, - ~ l III "''I.i " ''o "i'c'LI" u li1IA%
''i''.-' "'ll"I,li 'tai"t Oh briggs ana IL
ie."Li,' 'H't Ihl't7EGi vas summon
as -itnlalaer ana inat Hopkins was not
A"-
4. in1 return jeiAl' jhe Iititjid li error
-s.- -'.' '"lI. "Ig1 AJtInealioH' InaI ne
..yo " continuance oil the cause 20 the
>l t@'iI' ANA tHeiSupoh ne moved LOT q
i,t Il, W men hlo'ioh was "'e!tuled.
'"'A +lo'oA inc Court 20 4aasn the pro
F, Oh me ground th"t assets III the hAh4S
,1'1 '9."'"'T' i"l2I We're IN tio CUSTODY
'n1 '"'f ANU yo"I" mo- NC 'A0 N"HjIIJ u
/ u.~l.-hahi winch IhoJioh was oven ued.
'.1., "'." ms q, 2,S''',tS IuLl GA
'4 'I l ,I Sli',i, l1'', iI"PNlHS is
anu .I, ''l' 90 's eA
u,.,' 40 I-i'g.l. ''"','I l.'9''t '"' 81 niisS7,
l. . 2 l '""slIii'lle" ''A me Pay i"oH' 81
/ ~ - ''' s'N l'''''i> '"'h '"'' ""'o' NHl'h
F. ~ o'- 10, inc L'lGi''>' money "i Il tract
5'-" so ,l ., sal3 "dn5llStiatof, under an
g - d.: ~
II go t''7-I' a %
+ ". ''''' sun ~ "VI" M
- IN 81, ~ '''o IN
va ''.'5 nI"'', a. ""''n 'l'i9 "a, HlSHCC
=, 80 F','''C'' pay u'o"' Ill '"l', anu
Il i'"l''H' 'o'h issue thereon anu Iia'
~ cas-. WAS pthRlhg ana continued 10 the
r. term. ana Is bar TO The process OF gar
~ heHl. lie further sets mp that the tuud
|ehteu hl SaI4 hono is trust Iund IN the
l''s ol lne 'Il''li''~''''' am" NOT S"oJect
.t ti>"4N'",.
~ .ht same term. luoE !h'il @%' rendered
pm answer against the gafhlshce' VINO
|Me upon took TINS VIII OF error.
&c INST error assigned is, the refusal OF
III Court jo grant the continuance upon
|anoJI"n of the garnlshce.
% mollou was made, and II IS attempted
% sustained, under the provision OF The
|eehu clause OF Arr. lou ReVIsed Code ou",
|mt any defendant may file, with the
|afk. ON or before the third day of the re-
|rM term. written notice that he desires
continuance of the cause; and in that
|s& Judgment shall not be taken against
|eh defendant at the return term for want
plea, but the plaintiff shall be entitled
iud gmout by default at the next term. as
c0trsn Bat tits manifest that this pro-
|sA0n is NOT applicable to the case.
Tfa provision clearly has reference To the
|easliugs, trials and PROCEEDINGS in ordinary
|ad q gular suits instituted in the Circuit
|0nKk and actions commenced hv attach
|emAhnd actions of repIeviu" are expressly
|xnHFaed from its operation by Art. $50. and
IL renuiTcd to bo tried at the first term,
|oWn Ii it is TO be considered an attach
! ents fhe act itself shows that II was not to
{ aNnlled to that class OF suits.
5nh / he proceeding Is deuominated, by our
|akute. a oaluishmc1f and its nature ana
r. &C OF procedure on ii. are pre-
KlDEA by Arts aI3, 3l4. Rev Code 037, 03e,
aaADonE other things, 1t Is there provl'
H. Nhat upon the return Of suCh sum
IONS against the garnisheel. the like pro-
@AAHAgs may be had as in cases of garnishees
L co.'s of attachment BY reference to the
aEnfe regulating proceedings in attach
emit Ee see that ''garnishees shall in all
|as6E ohswer within the three first DAYS OF
IL KNkalrn term, unless the Court, for cause
|aaM shall grant further time Rev Code
|845 MNA 26) and that, when any;garnishee
| hf4 Nnmmoned, shall fail to appear and
isEn4<r rs by this act directed, the Cour
|li4lI Ter a iudoment against him for TN
rSs.S..E of the 9Iaintiff7s demand and al
N &C. Tart Ok
&C: N"lt. - o,,+iro s,ono
-, lSlQA f %t1'' a. State ibov
8 l'. ,,;,.ad ~ ansyye
& M ~ tarIo of tho Hrnaess and tha