The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1866-02-10
Circuit Court for BALTIC. County.
DECEMBER TERM 1853.

BEFORE Hon y. e. u. Emory, Judge John 7
Ensor, ESQ. States ATTORNEY
FRinAY, Feb "a
State W. John Pick indicted for Nh aS,,nl,
and battery IN Mary Eaton. The defendant
gave tail for bis appearance at court 10 the sun,
~ sou With Morris Frederick ~ his security.
u ". boarman, Es, fur defense Doe on the
demise " Chsrlcs " rirliE and others vs. Enos
Hartman action Of riecimcui --bclorv reported
The evidence 10 this ease was concluded this
morning and the cnuaai lrgan their argument
le'osr the c"GF; on the lAW - She Ease Nrssrs
l.cwis Mayer and \ ". Machcn for plaintiff
NcSSrs. Whcccr and ktcch for lcirnsc
SArrRpAY, Feb. 81
Levi Gise vs Charles Buck j1lsmrn, by de-
fsali. Notion /. icfeudsu, 80 strike cut the
lstsmtat ani quhsh the ingsisition. Argued
by Bernard Garter 49, for the lrfrndani IN
favor Of motion, and 10y Mrssrs whe,-l-r 4 ks,ch
Tor plaintiff against the notion. Held sub csria
The PETITION for niaadAmus in the c.se Of
John Thompson " l. ~ Alexander Nurdosh
was dNel for hearing on SATURDAY. Februar,
lsia Amer passing some orders &c no; ~
general Interest. The lOarf a. j0ufnci uH;ti Mot.
DAY morning. a; !" V',.ooa
NoNnu Feb i,h
Poe on the denise Of Charles " Pfr.,4 tuI
others vs. Enos Hartman. Til, Argument If
ihis case Vas bcguu by Lewis MAYER. ~. on
iae part q the plaintiff who wAs followed by
Wa ; keech. 80 on the par' 4 the defend
ant. snt the argausn; Was con,ludr,l ~ \ "
Naehcn Esq. on ihe part Of the plsiuur Wlcn
the cas- vas Submitted to the JURY. ~ho .sief
shor' Ahsencc. reisrned Verlic, ia iavorof the
psuntf.
SiA,v Henry Cox indicted Tor st-iA NJ Vim.
Gawsn with billy the deienIani gave oai for
ais aPpeafAa,e e, aJaf, u the sun u $50 81 n
john g Cox IS his secaritt SiA~' v. Wm
Cox, Indicted for striking benJamin l.Owrn " Ia
eily The defendant saVe hai 10 tie sum u
SeaH With Joan u. Cox - bis security. STATE
vs.. sane indicted for si.hlius Wm. Rowen
gave bal N he suia Of S!oo, WITH John u
Cox As his s-cunIy.
TtSDAy. Feb. sta
The state Va pr VIM a. Stokes an4 Mary
hl~nkinsop "hsrg-i With conspiracy 20 cheat
isfraui. &c cvfiain persons Whiie under iheir
charrr a; Nouu' Hops sad also unjas,v de-
iAlnins lrr~oas ia that institution, cafnc up b.
fore the Cosr; 20 DAY
Daniel r RAir.ifFe AMI Alexander v Roger.
Eais assist the STATE Ai'oru.y Nm Schle,
Wa = Preston Richard J Gi;tlues Eueene
gmi,kev. E-is APPEARED - eouus-i for az. H.
fvuc- tefcrs commencing The cas- VI Sti,-v
81 ine part Of the defence. stated 70 TIE Couf.
NAT TIRE separate aoiic-s hat tesn served uron
70 state Attorney, requesting hm Co faruis D
statement Of the fall particulars 81 ih- fal.e
pr-i=ncs Se-, The STATE rlt--'ed 70 -ely upoa
20 ihis cas~. aal the iisi u witnesses upou s.z
d. DREADED 20 suhs,tn'isie the charge. lie
stated that m cases Of tbs description il !. The
COMMON practice 70 require al the tariicu-
lars Of the conspiracy, and ~ the false preieuces
attended 20 - relied upon ~ the prosecution -
w. Easor replied that he had furnished ever,
iafoEtDaiiOa 10 biz poz-r that the false p-rten.
ors they iGieni~l 10 rely UPON acre sei forth "a
TIE Indictment, and that coulp l~;e list 81 wii.
n-sses 20 D. eIamine! Tor the State lad f.sa
furnished the defence. tie d-ciaei 10 furnish
am fufiber particulars ,haa ihose 81 forth IA
the adictmen;, and ieniei the fisht " tie De-
fence 10 make such denaaa
Ar Schlsy male motion that 'iIe case should
H. tined before The Court instead u the Jury
The cass thea pfooee,l--l b.iory the Court.
Ar Rogers IN avery l-ngthy statement sg@ne!
Tie case FOR the State. lie rad numerou. e..
tracts IRON the Asagal F.Isort. Of Mount Ho,-
PREPARED oy Dr. Stoke Tie medical a;,endanioi
that lnsiitation w Rogers said he 49, DIE.
pare! 10 prove that these reports contained tale
statements 10 reference 10 the condition II ~.
Asylufn. And uefe printed aud published for the
purpose Of misleading the public. H. next read
al account Of DISCUSSION which took place III.
ieea or eighteen years ago between DR. Stokes
aud pf. Amifiah Brigham. who about the wear
Iss-, visited N0Ent Hop. lyon his return he
Published account % the lnsiiiation, fL ~hich
be mentioned several defects which be (Dr Brig
han believed 10 exist. Mr. Rogers vent ou !.
say tina, Dr. Stokes VAS thus made aware of thr
Deficiencies that at that early day existed 10 The
asylum. BEFORE Mr.. Rogers had concluded III.
statement, the court adjourned.
tine hundred and hny-,hre Witnesses have
beeu summoned ~ this nainfer twenty are Tor
the State, aud the balance one hundred and
ihIriy-thrse, are for the defence. Among III.
wiinessss are several distinguished physici.ns
from baltimore aud Boston.