The weekly Panola star. [volume] (Panola, Miss.) 1857-1881, 1866-06-16


HfI..
M
IH.f.
f.fH
fH
M.t.lHt
.t0.fN
uNIIa
H4fi. t... IrI
EHUf lf.tf4 ..f
. u.HfH n1f
8. Iit Y lMf, WI
en- ml ISL Hh If ltu
p8fianu iutlH fvfIuuv af-lt 49,.
mraia ftaf f4# f.nI frtaHn ra
rfif. aul f.fH.. .uI .Nln s.L
30 vr nnI Hs.a ii G.m t
atilanor irlfr ua Wlrilfr tia a,l
uHaht ~ htys ll.p DuuHr4.J Ia
rmalp ihai mprarIs of dany.Bt.
lumlrd nId fGt a.... uf haI MOSS
ftpf .,ui0l iu m t,fy valuable e.r.
alId lot thr nti.a ar avon lneIr.I.
md HgIig dalIar. noi aniia tu,nt,
two mnit an arr. Tba ber v.r.
40 nfms. and no umrlian 0I ii..
8as appointed lo protect riflf iutrr
|cts N tla unlaror .la bad Boon
madc ihrru ,rtr laf.r. thia om ,up
would alone. hy force of the ma M
1916, have maIo 70 void. Asa vaa.
the order was yoidlllc. The record
and paper. In relation 10 the admin
i.tmilon have mono of them leeu lo.t
or DESTROYED. 40 order Of conGr
nation 4 found. No notice If amy
application for such order appeara 10
have been pivcn Ia the heirs. and the
fact are All Of too recent A date 10
Justify the court In Npplyinp lhc
absent testimony by prc.umntion. #
may be- even doubtful whether the
doctrine Of prcsumptions Is nj all an
plicablo to the case. Professor Green
leaf uys. "it docs not extend 10
records and public documents. which
are supposed always To remain in the
custody of the officers charged with
|, their preservation. and which tborc.
, fore must be proved. or their loss
accounted for and suppliod by socon.
7 dairy evidence | Grecnleac Ev. q
20. n. 81. And. Il il said. DIN like
/ manner. il is only where a chasm an
, pears in n pnblic registry. or in the
! rolls Of a conrl of record ar whcrc
, the books of registration or the court
, rolls have hoen dostrovoJ tina, ohio,
evidence i admitted of that whicL
tbo registry or rolls had thcv re-.
NAMED c%ni;ro mr. IN cyis,cncc would
: Themselves have shownp Mathew.
an prcsumn,ions 900 Lord Mans.
: feld's remark. 81 do not know an
: instance in which proof may not i,
sunnlicdp Uowner lO1A il ].nnnoso,
, N bc trnc ONLY when confined I,
grants from tho crown. and other in.
strnmcnts. r. any. crcoting oricinn
: RIGHTS. to he effective. sbonId onnc,,
: ON record. Matthews. POP.
| II il insisted bv tho counsel Co,
! the defendant that the evidence Given
; an his boholr was admissible. whrth.
i or tho sole was valid or moi. 10 cnabl,
him 10 sci nm the defence of Nh,
I, statute If Limitations founded an IN,
: G0b %soc,;nn If tbc act If 1911
/, Hutch Codc. $40
/, Tho record docs NOT show that tbi.
%,o;,, yros rni.cd IN Tho co,,rt bcloyy
! ar tb,t tho defendant sougbt IN avail
himself Of any such defence. n,
have reserved tho advantage Of mi,
noint. tbc defendant ought to hny,
; asked an annropriate instruction. Of
. n somc other proner form. mt in m,
I recorI ,bc evidence that he rolic,
nnon !, " f,r ~ vc can SOC. N,
ciso yos re.,cd entirely mon m.
ano.,i,ns a. - ,bc y,I;J;,y If N.
: gnlo which worn decided in favor a
. tho dcecndont and thereby any re.or
! to tho statute Of limitation was mad.
unnecessary. In the construction an,
I application Of the net, several i'm
will not now anticipate. Whcihc
= any sale has in fact been made, II
: the absence 81 continuation Wlethc
y Wl' "an' r a ~ a aI,.a s,', ~
nhe'se' 'V.' VI