, 1866-03-26
LAW INTELLIGENCE,
The Baron1a1 Divorce Suit..Baron Ton
Claim Moves to Modify the In
junction and Discharge the
Ne Exeat Now In Force
Against Him.
4 CHICAGO COMMISSION mER.
CHANT CONVICTED OF con-
JTGAL INFIDELTY.
Sentence Day in the Recorders Court
Twenty Criminals Assigned to Jail or
the Penisenttary-Comm Suits
-Writs OF fnjnnct1on-OEdef1
aud veEdtcta-Nevy Suits
Trial Calendar,

UNITED STATS CrHcCTr CoCRT-Rtfors Uoa,
1Aoaaas Ds1ssnso~d. Jsatg<.-Happoct vs. Wicker
Demurrer to frst four count. OF the declaration
oyc1ru1ed, and lesye aiyen TO plead.
Van EnveJ ct II. n phGnlx Insurance Company.
Demurrer Of plaintiffs to second, third and fourth
pleas sustained, md leasc given to defendant to
amend. Jury waived and cana. submitted to The
Court
:, MsEmssy %;I;n,;y '" Bsnn,nn. Discussed On motion
H4tea n. Etsnd1ath ct Il. Verdict Of guilty and
p1.1ntif,a d dsrnages a:esssed 1t fMa
paDy. Action OF assumps,t to recover damages lasd
Nsf7a eoma-Jamss Meclosky =, Schooner
Leuao1t- Action fok se4men's wage1-
Eamne1 HoWeand Enos kobbsns agents vs schoon.
stxsn nRon 1o7 Sont7et k<,,,< n, n,n " n7,.,r
Chief Justsct, and Uont. j. &. Gary and j. 4.
J1nesoa, Assoetae Jussaees-Ps1net -. Palmer.
II Shsnesg; Mastes's Fepon dlea I'd I'd eoanrmed
ed. Ibis vas N action in ch.ncttJ insututed
January 18th, 1895, By LoEinda 4. Palmer against
me- r In, ef to ot,ia a
separation upon the ground Of adultery. The con-
pl1inant IN her btn alleged that she Wis married 10
Ss~ 9on On ma
vile in New York Suite until about eight years aeo
when.her llfge LEFT her md came out West to ea-
IN ,hs S.s 11,e,: tn,t about ~ n1Rth mt,
hs SS,nnd w bsa an: n,ss e ts e. f age ~h3sa be
that .honab she had always acted md behaved =
good md failhfnl VILE her Benedict, to1gtts1l Of
The obligations tusepaIable from the nupnal union,
ri T. % md had n saas4y aSs9 %a d.
tse @ montss non ~ q Sovembes and beceneet R iast pa,
Sn My ,s%sos reo@ a 1 eese s3 25s % Il
open ef1te or CHtninAhtJ. claiming her to he his
wle, and whom It was charged he continued 10 keep
that 10 Vas Il the une Of inssituting The action
aforesalt. the owner Of some real estate N New
York stase, which bad been given to her
by beg fathes since beg marriage. Whlch
FORK allowed her ~ = married woman
TO hold ~ her sole and separate property, not sub
ject to the control Of her husband. nor liable for his
her oWu right, including much Of her household
goods. She prayed dissolution Of The marriage
ne Aforesaid an apportionnent Of alimopy, and the
mined personal Ind res ctate. o5 ihs 1s.h ofiass
month. proof Of ecrnee on defendant was entered,
md deiaul! being taken, the cate was leiened 70
Ell @ Mass5 &. u e33e9 e a as!R9 REo9s
ne.tes examined we're Milton Q. Munger, proprie::
tor Of the Me5chants' Hotel. n this city, and
Msh.s! 4 Harley; RsepT,sto1 q ths uoya Hen,e:
| woman Knmbo, 'uoW Mr.. Mary 4. Wood," )" had
llved ut their respective hotels a. naa and wlte.
j. A. Sleeper. Fsq, solicitor for complainant,
testified IN open couEi that the defendant VIVA en-.
eaged IN the purchase OF cattle and hoss, and that
In euch business he had met come severe Losses and
| incurred some liabilities.
| decree Of divorce and freedom from ali marital
restraint the exclusive possession Of her real and
personal property - aoEeead, and the sum Of FOO
Mary cni,sl1 VI: Jane, Garrett In chsucey,
canae hsa!d % aad decree ea.cred @ Appeal
| In he = fra4 firm
ncate Of publication nled and default Of ali the dc.
fendants entered: Reference to the Matter to take
Won Claim +. Won Claim. In chance4y. In this
someahat celebrated divorce su1f, instituted by the
vSp Gn ss
I tain dissolution Of The marriage tie upon the
gronna OF extreme and repeated cruelty, the follow.
ng soadas1t Va. % Saturday nIed BY TIE Baron tn
| and modify the injunction iesaed against him:
nIideorandt August Won Claim, being duly
sWoIn npoo hts oath, saith that he ls the defend:
ant IN the aboTe entitled cause and that be has read
the bin Of complaint and the several afdasjts aled
IN this canse md npon Nhlch The writ Of ne erea.
vas tssued and thls alan, denies that he has ever
% q t1e ehild %eni,opea i 81 d. ss,a iii
sna go aeroad a9d beyond The 5uri:distioa Of III.
threatened 10 90 abroad. or to Germany. or beyond
the Jurisdiction Of this court either with without
the eAtd child and that The only manner IN which
be cyefy propoee e 10 I'd ahroad Or beYond ihe iu,is
1cfon of This court was that be proposed to 70 to
Germany with the taid cn,1d. and In compsny d
| and With the faia complainant. and that be made
thts proposition prevtons 10 the commencement ol
this euiL and before tho aid complainant left hi
house. and that he does not row intend to 70 abroad
or besond the Jurisdiction Of this court either with
OF uttbout the ead child irrespective Of the dnrcsa
imposed upon him By the witt Of ne E:at Issued It
this case brt that he intends TO rsaln within tht
jurisdiction Of this court until this cause Is fnalJ
dispotea Of, and until he has fy compiled with al
orders md deuees made therein.
The follow ing Wss the motion Of defendant aboTt
referred 10:
sAnd now cpmes the eald defendant by Edw3ft
Jus<en, his solicitor, and mores the Court upos
fbe iii Of complaint and upon the answe1 and iht
affidsritr f1ed ID ibis Cause.
First. To mo{]ify the Injunction Issued In thi,