, 1866-11-18
IMPORTANT DECISION.
Horse Railways and Street I'M
provements.


lEcuue 10 ,hc doc: I,nc Of the Chicago Rl!er, %
ID eurbed viii stnue. and paved With what 10
sione.s ot il Eoasd Of Public Works proceeded
70 msko an assc. snnent On The Tesl cstln e:saed
by the contemplated Improvement, and
reported II to the Common Council. BY which ,pdy
1t was approved. and on the 1-ah OF October, 1as5
4 Ear1ans vas lssned tn It's sof!ecttoa. AZ the /
: TebsuatT Tern. TT. os thc Superior Court Of
! hicace, Ire Eolitcio7 made "a Application Tor
judgment AGAINST those 1e!s on Which the asseks.
lnent bad MT ooen pats' The owners 81 ma2t OF
lee
enter jncsnent, and the city las brought The REG
o: q 70 .h1t Court-
~ 1s one o te
lec,sopMs Is tasen 70 ,hs Collectors rs2ott i ap-
pe7ss BY llc Iscord shnf street railway enmpa-
Company, has posseesior OF eonsid s.ahle por.
Icn OF 'his otrect By it, road-b"d, ties. rails and
ard ,hat 70 ra.s q .as IL 2us,;
y net eonten1ed thstsae company u uat b2:Ie
~ ne improvement 1hat It must be yesJ lafsely
nensaled, a. - p!%oposit,on p =, % which, We p:e-
We a1c not advised b. the record what Is tas
p sssns p1sensnt r Of r N9rth CLARK stree: cr
lance intended T. b covered BY TIC proposed
pavement h.a become Imperfect = It woald
ihis : new % vs. % . g. IN pisee f of one
Of some Other lind no longer dt tor use, Or 70
.snsse tae AZ nd a. .nq ast y ae H
dsed By tho Improvement. It must be matter Of
gseat impotsanGH tn u 70 hare 9Mooth and
au1sele fcaa PEG lor inc Ea,sase Q! rs can aud
tas tIass1 q q II IL of.es Toc coanl sones. sasc
not refot1ed mat iIe rauwaJ MAS mol bsneated-
40 qnssnon .! that cha5aS'ss enbarfasses tho
'ne1a,l%aJ VIZ 10. ass.ssed, bseaast. 10 what..
socses !cgrec u mieat o. nenentetl, Y W4s not
conacefsa W INC asJ nn,hos1llrs EAhlc 70 any
d on stai 'ssue, nd Ioth partie. e1p1sss th-aa.
qnestion ot much Importance 70 tho peor1c Of
Ch!caFo- We assume, then. n coun>e1 haye Es-
sa!1eos taAt tne fal*Ay soMpAn1 "o9ld pc oene.
ated % ne proposed mpsosemsnt Tue Preei3o
degree y. foF The PURPOSES Of this case, wholly
On ne lsn q Fenloaty, 1s,a re Le3Hllature
Eas-f6 r. aia aet Meotposanae ne MoTa Cnieaao
sasy 4enway Cempasys ana antnGsffsd MtG e1a
e!.nSt 4no opea1e EAuNay ln suca etIeeIe in tne
norm ptsis!on, ana upon eaEn tesMs a. miEoL %. os
aCfseo opea Ipsea H.n ~ sns NY .o1nen, NJ sc a :s
isi ,o Inc M o.IS parSso al o. sas
teScntn seeSiou Q. walsn pnspo7s % r heee
,srns, nc ~ fne e. eomPany accepted. ~ me o;1G
i3a1 d!aM g III osanaee, "a 40" On nc, ~ ne
.sssn1h .ee.:oa, i Pas.ed s;r1p ii paper, o.
Wlien - TFasn a. YEA ,sa pafp1s e &c RHoa o1
me psoHsthS.ns h. .. sais ses III. h,.$ sa$ nn
BY bong he1d asaiust stEote li:h. san
he somp.eyy 70 * ri. f.. e sys!y .s,sSs g;
sl!tten iess . double tsacS Is Lag. In sooa =.
par ap1 cosuun shn ~ ra ,.t ~ .h.;, ho =.
Eth ~ ~ ~ Ta,nl To ,r,;tIar ,,nn-, Il, n.stsS
or t1e ch5 SonnsE re w1:ns upom ns ,as Ras;H4
o. ~ T 10 ~ ~
os,sinsl o. diaaree ana .has up.1 tbe pas ea p.oei
* ~ G Inc see,o1 nI W. y. aon9+st
o. tnc oanS,. W. 1a4I "!!.asn Hpon '1e oa:lqa =
s4gnoi.;ed I ,nto MA ths otdinsnec Without ts subor
9, snG CounEs' 1na @ asTss aa1p.eu ~ 'nst p1
eontndaa tnas ia, the proTis|ons fonn ano, ~
tolsc 4oou .nat ~ F'o'arIu,s sSaIa .t nlsea :.
/ H1NttA R8PV@ "NAE P~AAN0 VI INC N44M4AN'
III hi, ,.suc much evidence has betn taken. m,
10 i;e a'ecuss,o. rnuel Of he .rrunen, Ia bea
detoed. Wscthc1, bexeTer, ~ w III. fa p.sted Cd psps 90
dsnes !ecatT aa@itstote . lo1 uat pntposs, y =
es*e. i l. alrssesssly 70 decide. Il nay be =
~ s9o1id as 20 aaG sna 'et1 y r. 20 gTea
~ Nv Tn-,.e1 raye.,, ~ -
et;t y ~ ,N.9 ,sft;s. w. y. " ~
nn. sntcss.,s ~ 1rccs rsins tHst sSs1; r.
!sass N heh dcn9t weat r. fx oFo'naeeA really as
oTSet ~ne4 4tn ine H., nFe. <,a. ,rh,,,,
p'see or SECESSION. Il aas iaas ssstsi this e.s
%hna ,.hd uS ht 1 ~ thts i
sosnea ~ ~ Iu1t. ,1 y - ~ w o. 'hEs sM!e
NJ: psEo ef7: Tbs ca.e vas yer! tnl!y .rgact
anu VI. ..isn3r ;.m.a tt y ~ ae ~ ~
, there announced, 1t vas then held That the CO,
enua11i as sso'1srSa i teqaas e4a5 o. ,11
non appnea y Me'i " spst!a' hstsssEsnis 1t !.
imp1oseuenis u lnts cna!.e'en - .ua an " Il
Z | form o! la1auon. 1n2t3 "neh tug uaEusu - 10
| iuFosfd upon aho*e "no At prhenuu ~ tne pr
| poseu 1n,pfoycmrht; mHst ne Imposed ape
81 VIC aE oIle9n1 oe9saieo' ID lnS saMo 9. y y
nensn5-e.neSe ~ ~ ~ wouIa " sintauun Gs,,o,, =.
~ ns ~ nTipcis :; ~ s';e, ~ y
WI p " a.. ~ T. hp ~ y -
smpt potu"Ho " sruss ueu Atcot wv l1c4so'
efTsEe !ne nnroen upen sae remauuct.
~ Hns' ~ !!snt ~ naAa saeas speeta 11s
dona!n snka 20 us taNas poFsf, And t ~as - -
,ts 3Gtt fIouipcnsAu1 isquttea y tne SohsHt
~ ~ y Y. .L.kn. W nAae - neacate. 1at y Nas 10
!Eat lEe asEessn nsnts mael oe ua1e " nc I4tto
r soehhIAsIa |" esHtais. NAicA No11u atSsasAsl
TaEhe tnat Il saonio e imposed eqa!uJ npt
sfrfelcH* ea8"ll3 oeueattea. Or II woulo ot q
d | !3wni-
u3hc loH11 1h,a Fion To- ~ case o. tae - Gan
r nIu:1eeFs t. ~ ~ ~ =. n.easo. ~: ~
Il M ~, ~ ~ ~. ~ =,
~ 49, "a. ~, t.S 49,, ~ -, tsrsht. ;hs~"x. 's,rfa, y rs,
a q aev.ntsces q eeneam toe! Ase tawdal. Aen
0 the Court held that an assessment foFfht impro,
ment OF eEcct, by WHICH inc cdM was R&stsa
4 upon The property bordering tae stree:
). Proportion 70 re 1ronnsr OF each J.
~ WIn2nt a9J 1ess1ease 70 ueSteS
IL Malea ~ oi.c5ent tots I!'Ent pr ocneusso, =
= uusuI14tA tonaI, ahu WY. nNAas, uu1s' sL :,
: sa1N 81 speeA1 8teAsmsnt Aaa Aamet III u
y 81 eminent doEA:u. INC CITY Vas Lc4i5 no!au
y | The pf1r1p!e ol eQnA1ly oi pnble pnEnen
= | sef1:td y the tonstiintaon The sole Question !
q volVca and decided 10 taat eass ga taa sATae r
tsnfed y the ease a. na.. - tais Gsss, ~ y ~
INC So. ~ neea -
d sn9,h,ur he eics,cs han IN ;h,t Il one.th!si