The New York herald., 1866-05-30

citizens had invested large amount OF property in these
nsSesss and that many we're , annually
the treaty was abrogted we having expressed read
to adhere to IT, that any harm accrued TO them
ment-uotwihstanding this the government were most
anxious 70 prevent any harm from befaing these fisher
men and those who had thus invested their property In
bona tide manner Oh these coasts Now, his honorable
friend had read list Of vessels Of war which he called
all ciads though he believed only was Of thst
description-lMr. watkin--'I said two were iron
cads "-and which, be said had been sent by the
American government He was not aware whether that
ss was authentic or not for no had not seen IL in an
Official paper and he believed such sG'smeps scere ire
quen'tu m1de by NeU York joaynl's through iatr ed
moirea II possible therefore, that the statement
might be, 1t was no deronsraon of Kos ae claracer
and from what he knew OF the official correspondence
between the two governments he could state that the
United states government hal shown the very bost
postum to deal with this question In q friendly, fair
and conciliatory manner (Choors) To tell him, there
fore, that the sending vescs-of OF the coast was
source Of danger to tell him what he could not
believe II tho fishermen were left to themse elves 1t
was not impossible that collisions might arise which
might lead TO msunderstandings; but tho presence OF
vessels Of war, commanded BY officers who felt the
responsibility Cast upon then and who were anxious TO
best security for the pr scrvation OF peae The yery
fact therefore, OF the American ayup sent
their fleet was to his mind the best possible proof that
they were desrous TO maintain peace and 10 prevent
collisions which would Otherwise be likely to take place
lHear, hearl Her 1ajesty's government had received
Of assistance in preventing any such collisions and IN
br ngius about good understanding on the srb
ject Proposals having reference to the fishery
question had been made on both sides, but for obvl-
Gus reasons he could not ut present. lay them before
the House, although he might say they salts
factory nature tHesr hear) He hoped in short time
result acceptable 70 this country would be arrived at
and this was now likely to be the caso since moth n
could be more friendly and conciliatory than the
pursued by the United states with regard the sher
tes iearl He regarded the soppago of ihe trade b.,
tween the United States and colonies disaster to
both countries II was sst IN .e OF her Maestys
government to force the trade upon ttc United states,
and they were therefore compelled TO leave the mater
to public opinion In that country where the benefit they
riv ed from the vast trade with colonies would
DO discovered and before very long would induce the
United States government TO put an end to The restric-
tons which were so much 10 be deplored (Hear.)
Tho O'COyNoR Don said ho was at Washington ut the
time the notice Of tho termination Of the treaty
given, and he thought the government had pursued
very judcious course in reference ~ It.
Mr.. KISsAIRD and Mr.. WHITE thanked Mr.. Watkin for
having brought the subject forward.
Mr.. CARDwKLL remarked that the bonding arrange
ments for the transit Of goods by railway not
depend upon the treaty. but the mutual and
mutual relations existing between the two countries
Il was the same with regard to the navigation Of the ST.
Lawrence and Of Lake Michigan; and there was in
len,ion OF terminating those reciprocal arrangements
With regvrd to the fisheries, tho government in
friendly communicat on with the government OF the
United States on the subject and viewed with satisac-
lion, and not alarm, the presence Of naval force
he station.
Tho subject then dropped.
India.
BOMBAY. May II. 1866
Cotton depressed; export Of the week, 1900 bales.
Exchange 2s 1ssd
CALCUTTA, May 10, 1853
Exchange 2a 1fd rreighis 37s. Cd Ratio Of discoun:
eduCed per cent
China.
HosG Kose, April 20, 1880.
Tea unchanged Exchange 4s 7Hd.