Lamoille newsdealer. [volume] (Hyde Park, Vt.) 1860-1877, 1866-06-06
LAMorLLE COUNTY COURT.
MAY TERM, 1865.

tflt OuC VIC udNC obS"oy ANfS>
was G. S. Kinsley v. O. Stcarns g. CO.
This was an action claiming damages fol-
breach Of warranty of 100 barrels of -four
The defense was that the defts. did not
sell the -four but acted as agents for the
splf ia ordering the -four from parties in
Toledo, Ohio '"' -
The case was argued by Hendee for plff.
and Noble of St. Adams and Powers for
defts. Verdict for plff, and exceptions by
def. c g8a Haa
o5s Hendee g. Lewis. and wilkins for plff.
Dewey g. Noble, Powers & Gleed' Brig
ham & Waterman for dcfts.
There were several hearings before the
Court: ......
The first in order of time was chan
Gerry case heard out of its order to accom-
.modate Mr.. Redfeld.
81 The case was Noah Boynton Farmers
Mutual Fire Insurance Company.
This was a Bill in Chancery stating that
the dcfts. made an insurance with Charles
Jewett, Jr. on house, barn and other prop
crty in 1868, for FIVE years, and received
pay for the whole term. On the 18th of
Nov last, Jewett's administrator sold to
Boynton, and transferred the insurance at
the same time. The rules of the Conpa-
ny give 80 days to notify them of trans.
fers. Notice of this transfer was given to
the Company Nov 81. The house was
burnt Nov, 10 and the Company refused
to approve the transfer to Boynton. The
Bill claims that the Company is bound to
approve the transfer unless there is good
reason to the contrary. The defense is
that the Company can refuse or
not at its pleasure The case was heard
on general demurrer and and argued by
Benton for orator, and Redfeld for the
defts.
Decision rot yet given. R. G. Benton
for orator. T. p. Rcdfeld. S. Wells, for
defts.
Town Of Wolcott v. Town of Williston.
This case was heard out of its order.
1T was argued on an agreed statement
of facts. The only question was as to the
construction of the statute providing that
d list of $50 for five years in succession
should give settlement. The defendant
claimed that the $50 referred to the ap-
praised value of the estate which would
give percentage of 30 cents. The plain
tiff claimed it meant a list on which taxes
were to be assessed, which would require
property to the value of $4,000.
Argued by P. X. Gleed 70, plff, Talcott
and Waterman for deft. Judgment for
plff. Parker, Powers g. Gleed for plff.
Talcott, Brigham g. Waterman for deft.
Exceptions by def.
Town Of Cambridge '. Town Of Under
hill.
This was heard on motion for new trial.
The cause assigned was newly discovered
evidence of certain declarations Of the pau.
per Farwell about his intention of making
his home in the West.
A great number Of deposition we're read
on both sides and several points made in
the testimony and arguments
The Court decided the new testimony
to be insufficient to Justify new trial.
Hendee & Lewis for Underhill. Pow
ers & Gleed, wilkins for Cambridge.
I. o. Wescott v. luke Potter g. Trutees
Isaac Mcrrick. NJ. Mcfarland, claimant
Ills was hearing on report of COM
smissioners as to the liability Of the Trus.
tee. w aneIw 2a.s Y .lu a. H
Judgment in favor Of claimant.
Powers, Brigham & Waterman for plff
PIX Glecd, Hcndee for claimant. Excep.
lions by plff.
Knowles g. Leland v. L. B. Drury g.
Trustees, NJ. o. Heath, d. H. Watkins.
Hearing on Commissioners report dis
charging Trustees aEai Ifnn ji vd
Judgement pro lorna that Trustees be
discharged. Erret
Exceptions by plf
Brigham g. Waterman for plff. Heath
for Trustees.
QHenrysBenton and William W. Eaton,
recent graduates Of the Law School Of the
gniNysrsity Of Albany, were admitted to
practice ~ attorneys aoa raua.
sUWl4