The tri-weekly standard. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 1866-1868, 1866-11-24

The House referred to concur. ana sen
message to Senate proposing to go lnto sai'
election forthwith. au.od
Mr. Hutchinson from committee reported
Joint rules of order for the governmentoi eus
two Houses. uouse do M,
MIR. Logan moved that the house w no nv.
concur. He opposed the rule nnLis t .he
,,,n,her of finance committee-maKln tnt
s9e -, ~ Uonse branches thereof OF equal
,.nr,her He held that it was wrong In prln-
- .b. aouse of Commons being clearly
op., =, ruJe said committee from all leg
:ai,t;,1o nracedents hitherto recorded Also
ths rule in reference to the joint committee
On MAGISTRATES He held that this commit
tor would take the appointment entirely out
of the hands of the member; he nad never
heard of such a committee before.
NJ durham favored the joint rule
NJ. I.,tham of Washington did the same.
NJ I,von opposed the rule in relation to
.,aristrates He deemed it an innovation.
H. tbouoht each members knew better
hon, 70 anpoint for his county, than COM
,n;ttee of members from other counties;
Mr. Davis favored concurrence In the re-
mort of the committee -,
NJ LYON and Mr.. Russ replied, opposing
+ho rn,e in relation to a joint committee on
Tr Freeman favored the appointment OF
com netent Magistrates, and he deemed TINS
rnlp to be in the way OF that necessary oo-
ject. hon, tho NOM
hers of the proposed committee could tel
who was competent to be MaglstraIe' anu
who not How could a member nom the
East tell who ought to be masistraOe III
Randolph He was there to represent MS
Cnnntv and to recommend Magistrates. He
denied the RIGHT of others to do this latter
,,or+ f,f his dutV for him.
The yeas and nays being called tor, the
House refused to concur in the report as FOL
lows:
YEAs-Messrs Allen, Baker, Eoyd, Cow
an, Crawford of Macon, Crawford, OF row
an, Davis, Davidson, Durham, Foard, Car
riss. Gorllam, CRANBERRY, Harding, Harper,
Henderson Holderby, Houston, Hutchinson.
Judkins. KELSEY, Kenan. Kendall. Latham, OF
Washington, Lee, Long, Lutterloh, Martin
McAuthur, McClammy, Mckay, McNalr, NC
Rae, MooIe, of Hartford, Patton, feeoies'
Re,nbardt. Richardson. Smith. OF Gullford,
Turubun, Whitefield, Williams, OF Harnett'
Williams, of Pitt, Woodard-44.
Those who voted in the negative are
NAYs-Messrs. Ashworth, Autry, ba,oeh'
Beasley, Black, Blair, Blythe, BradSher'
Rr;ol,t Bryson. Carson, Chadwick, Clark,
Clements. Daniel, Farrow, Freemen, Gallo
xav Cambria. Garrett, Goodwin, Guess, Hin
naIt. Hodnett, Horton, of Watauga, Horton,
of Wilkes, Jenkins, of CASTOR, Jenkins OF
Granville, Jones, Jordan, Latham. OF Craven
Logan, Lowe, Lyon, May, McGougan, Moore
of Chatham, Morton, Morrissett. Mnrr'ii,
Neal, Perry. of Carteret, Perry, OF wake
Rogers, Rosehro, Rountree, Russ, Scoggin,
Scott. Shelton, Simpson. Smith, of Duplin,
Stevenson Stone, Studderth, league, Trull,
Umstead, vestal, Walker, Waugh, Westmore-
land, Whitley, Wilson, of Forsyth, Williams,
of Yancy, Womble York-67.
So the whole of the report of the commit
tee was rejected
But Mr. Logan moved to reconsider the
vote and to strike out the rule in relation to
Joint committee on Magistrates, which was
carried.
The report was then concurred In, and the
House adjourned.