New Orleans daily crescent., 1866-02-15
Ihr G(uurts.
Gases Set for Trial This Day

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
United States VS.. s. NJ. Swenson, Canal Bank a
garnishee-U. s. Attorney. j. N. Lea, Georg
Jonas, President.
| John Condor vs.. Griffin 4 Porche-Sullivan
Billings & Hughes. Durant Il Hornor.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT.
| Succession of Brinkman-Semmes Mott
Succession Of r. McIlhenny- ny--Howard. morgan
& New. Ed #49s
Succession of a. Quintal- -Grandmont' ~ MaI;r nIh.
Succession of Jesse Connor--Saucler :" "ioi'ii'
ard. Bryan s Beverly, Gurley. CLAW nor
Succession of zabetton- -Yoorhies, Glenn. Der
| bes, Castera. la Ga m q w III
Succession Of Guare--Janin, l'- = W =
THIRD DISTRICT COURT.
De George VS.. Durrive--Dufour, Eihlore q Ming
NJ Blache, ]. Magne, BIlss9n, u,,,,,, na,,ho;,na ~
& Buck. 49,, xr;ss e,.,,o,,
o1s'P . II Hneston VS.. Mason & Gilder-Phillps and
Cotton. Sheldon Pardee.
EXCEPTION.
Richard vs.. Aldidge ct al.-Magne. Castera.
tS.% We new CASES. Af' =a
( J.B Cottman VS.. JA NJ. Morson-Lacey. Sim
NJ Gugenheim vs.. B. Beonbay- ay-sambola & sDu-
eros. Dnfour.
City Of New Orleans vs.. C. Roselus-H
! q. L. Bright VS.. G. F. Picton-Bright. Leovy.
John N. McGill VS.. N. McDuif & Co.-Iacey.
Whitaker, Fellows i Mills.
j. H. Dorand vs.. John Fathers s-Collens. Legar.
deur. t.I..7y
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.
RULES.
James II. Gibbons VS.. John Hein--R. II. Brown.
John p Nesmith vs.. VIM. Bailey.
Ralph P Miller vs. Bower, Garner & Harrison
Cooley. Bright. ...-...
CONTINUED CASES.
Fred. Gobble vs. Crugler & Batcheldor and
Pooley-Bradford. Semmes & Mott.
J. w. Burbridge l. Co. VS.. Geo. l.. Kouns ct al.
Al uNArpEALABLE CASE. ts~.-
Malcolm Ainslie VS.. Commercial Company
Field & Shackelford. Leovy.
1855 ApPEALABIE CASES.
! George Ingram vs.. F. Broon--T. A. Bartlett. G.
e. Schmidt. s.,,.a- g+..g
A. Willoz 8 Co. VS.. L. Ferrant-A. Robert
Bermudez.
H. D. Newcombe 4 Co. VS.. R. P Ethel & Co.
Hunton u Miller. Lacey. 5
Patrick Coffee vs.. r. Poehelu-Ogden & Clai-
borne. Bermudez.
Henrietta Mitchell VS.. J.J. Person & Co-Rawle.
McCay. 4eta
Harvey johnson VS.. John A. Stevenson-Be
Clark 4 Bayne. .sy "a
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT. Ill.,
Mrs. Mcneil vs. Knapp-Bermudez. Elmore &
King, Day. g'
N. Bernin vs.. steamship Matanzas ct ais
sapuei' Iatum' rav CAS-.
D. N. Hennen VS.. New Orleans and CarroIlton
N. Hennen. Roselius & Phillips
fcConnel, Miles Taylor. .e
ApPEALABLE CASES. .r ..-.-.l.. d
Darcy y Wheeler vs.. A. N. Denouvian-Co Cohen.
J. j. & W. Il. Cooley.
Pettengill & Rockwell VS.. Bates & Benson-T.
Collens. H. Train curator ad hoe.
Goldsmith, Haber g. Co., VS.. NJ. Hitler, Wolf &
Jo.--McCay. H. Train curator dd hoe
G. Duplantier VS.. j. B. Michond. Bermudez,
,ollens. g1
VIM. Florance ys. Victor Conaud. Phillips &
.eovy. Deblieux g. Taylor. TIL
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT.
RULE.
Stewart & Baer VS.. Campbell & Harper-Day.
liver.
CONTINUED CASE s-."'0
Widow Vogel vs. A. Reichard, ct al-Dufour
radford, Lea & Finney.
NEW CASES
]. L. Edward VS.. G. A. Weed-Yan Dolson. Ad.
,ozier.
Gerson, ct all. VS.. Hebrew Congregation, ct al
.oselius y Phillips. Whitaker, Fellows & Mills.
p. e. Simpson vs.. Bank of Louisiana-W Whitaker,
elbows 4 Mills. Miles Taylor.
E. w. Dorr vs.. Bank of Louisiana-W Whitaker
elbows Mills. Miles Taylor.
Mrs, Massie wife, etc., VS.. Danl. Blair-Hyams
Jonas. Whitaker, Fellows and Mills,
i. Millaudon VS.. eileen & Hunnewell-Roselius
nd Dufour. Morgan and Field.
Mrs. F. Carrera, tutrix, vs.. A. p. Valencia
ambola d Dncros. G. E. Schmidt.
L. DeLise vs.. H. r. Bonham-V. F. & J. B. |
otton. Bright.
The case Of Jamison VS.. Bareli is continued
It'll Saturday Gath inst.