The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1866-12-20

have any OF the slips that sent me in 1885, they
Sss ss mpg Ike the oofs
type; never sent word 70 Mr. mAretzeE. tnrGrsn ~
Gssche that must have more FREQ ucss.; d1 70.
demand for myself Mr. caldwell extra season
did not visit the opera during that season - Ill =.
Crcy' at that time was employed Tor seven neus on
kilograms and arrange them for the paper; NJ croly
transacted business for rs outside OF the once wnas
ever DID you ever SEND wosa sns you o moi tsisS
be had any difficulty with the HERALD at that timer
Redirect-I reside in Brooklyn IN Concord street;
thar less than half mile from the ferry and only Two
miles from the Academy Of Music in New York.
Re-cross examined-I resided in Livingston street sew
sa
ney Norris and Judge Gilberts know nothing
about 1t, sir have heard nothing Of i since
REsUTTISG EVIDENCE FOR rHR PLAINTIFF.
Mr.. Gosche recalled and examined by counsel TOT
plaintiff @ Did you send any slips 70 the defendants
during the fall Of 'ess A. did not; had orders not
TESTIMONY or DANIEL KNGsIASD.
was Of the trustees of the Academy or Music IN
1868 attended It constantly at that time never saw
any pckpockets there; am not acquainted with any
pickpockets or gamblers except BY repute.
Cross-examined-There was but one gambler tnat
ever knew, and think that he was dead al that tme
1863 M
TESTIMONY OF PULLMAN.
I was superintendent OF the opera house; ! had the
ushers and doorkecpers under my control; am ac-
quaned with the characters that requented the house,
do not know any pickpockets or gamblers
The evidence hero closed, whom, after short re-
cess the court Mr. Hall proceeded 70 address the jury
Tor Inc uelenCe
After few general remarks he said that when man
steps before the public as g%ps susc or ns orss
Speaking Of tho relations OF the press TO places Of public
amusement the speaker said that he would say broadly
place Of amusement that did not owe its success entirely
to the press Let the press Of this city DO silent on
ns ssuOS 81 son@ sna
word that on such q night she would perform,
her audience would be very limited The press is the
NJ t.1onaa nj
and all the success that Max Maretzek has obtained he
obtained through the press and that that Is acknowl
edged by the gentleman the other side Is evidently
very true In this case He is very willing to be raised in
the world by the press when II speaks well OF him. ana
pleases him. but the very moment II 70 eil
the truth that moment he reseus It. is like game
Of cricket yon must protect your crickes; you must
look out for your bowlings and battings He who stands
criticisms as wen as its plaudiis We did our duty
tho public and duty TO Max iaretzek, who never
has exhibited those operas since that time which we
to the innumerable suits OF SANDER which pubic men
would have they paid attention to everything that was
tiff that the articles instigated by malice because
he did advertise with Defendants was very patry
for all about the yEss sue
and such paper do not suppose that journal cares
anything about that Every man has right 70 conduct
then the ~" argued that when an opera or theatre
manager gave FREQ tickets TO the press he
said, "Como and my performances" man
tator has hss. The moment you make the manager
have charge OF such thing, Of course he will say,
ar you praise my performance good follow; but when
You do not beware Of lbes The speaker then argued
that the Italian Opera performed on the stage, was
shumbug," and said that because there were great
many battered old yo9s that VISIT the Black Crook that
did not make It necessary that the jury should take
their and daughters to see it. District Attorney
hall then concluded his remarks by referring To particu
lar portions Of the alleged hbes, and claimed that they
were all proven to DO true.
Mr.. judah, counsel for plaintiff then reviewed the
Of the the defence BY that the
opera more immoral in It's tendency than Shaks-
peres works. and then proceeded to argue that the art
cics in question bclous in their character his
remarks occupying over hour in their delivery.
Judge Mcneil in his charge TO the jury, said that any
thing written printed with malicious intent and
exposing TO ridicule and contuney upon an
other by which means his name is prejudiced, was
boons and therefore II remained for them to decide
10 regard TO the facts in tho case.
Tho jury not being able agree Immediately they
instructed sealed vsrdict, when the court 3D.
journed, ai n quarter TO 1--WE o'clock