The evening telegraph. [volume] (Philadelphia [Pa.]) 1864-1918, 1866-03-01

The case of Patrick O'Beirne VS.. James Lloyd,
which came on Tor a hearing on Monday, was con-
tinued yesterday before Judge Ingraham III the
Supreme Court, Chambers, and the following addi-
honal afidavits were pNsented;-
RNEw YORK SUPREME CoURT.-Patrick OBeirne
agt James T. Lloyd. Office OF the Tribune, New
York, February 81, 1866. City and County of New
York, IS. :-Horace Greeley, being duly sworn, de-
poses says, that he IS the editor of the New ork
Tribune; that as such he was solicited and induced
by Mr.. j. Il. Lloyd, map publisher, No. 70 Court
landt street. in this city, to write letter endorsing
United States then recently published by said
Lloyd that said Lloyd proceeded thereafter IN the
summer or autumn of 1864. to issue very different
edition Of said map, SO colored and with such ex-
transous electloneerinE matter printed thereon as
was calculated 10 subserve partisan purpose ac-
ceptable 10 sald Lloyd but most dstastelul and re-
pugnant to thls deponent; which altered and elec-
honeering Map the said LLOYD extensively adver-
Used and sold as sanctioned and commended by
this deponent: which this deponent regards as
dishonest, reprehensibe, pertdous trick OF the
said Lloyd whom he therefore regards as q knave
and cheat, utterly unworthy of confidence or re.
spect. HORACE GREELEY, No l64 Nassau street.
subscribed and sworn before me Feb, ~ 1865
j. B. ELWooD, Notary Public
NEW YORK SUPREME CoURT-Patrick OBelrne
vs.. James T. Lloyd.-City and county of kew York
IS. .;-Abraham Van Wtnkle, OF Newark, New Jer-
sey, being duly sworn SAYS that the 14th day of
October, 1854, an agent OF the said James T. Lloyd
called depOnent, representing that he was getting
subscribers for Farmers Railroad Telegraph, and
Express Map of the United States and Canadas, and
solicited subscriptions in advance, representing tnat
said map would be furnished dep0nent in O rev
months from that time; that annexed hereto 10 the
agreement and receipt given deponent by said
Loyds agent; that deponent has never received the
SAID map, and he is informed and believes, the
SAID Lloyd has never publisned such map although
he has paid fol- the same in advance, as will appear
by said receipt.
That SAID uoyd's agent at the very least received
in the city of Newark alone from 200 TO 300 subscri-
bers for said supposed map, all of whom paid IN ad
vance for the same, and none of whom to deponents
knowledge or belief ever received anything of value
therefor
Ihe said subscribers look upon said Lloyd as
swinder and that he has received their money, and
this depOnent's, by means of false and fraudulent
representations which never intended to be per-
tLimed.
That deponent is a druggist at said Newark. and
having seen account in The NelO York Herald of
this morning that an attachment was issued from
the Supreme Court against said Lloyd, as fraudu-
lent and concealed debtor, ielt bound in his con-
science TO give the information before written
against said Lloy d, and has left his business and
came here to New ork for no other purpose but to
te / how he was swindled by said LLOYD, through
hsaFents. ABM. VAN WINKLE.
Sworn to before me this 27th of Febru AZ y, 1866
FERDINAND KURzMAN,
Notary Public, New York CITY and County.
Since report OF this case appeared in Yesterdays
papers plaintiffs counsel has received large
Der Of letters in reference 70 tho Map aludec 10
the latter affidavit from parties who subscribed for
such Map, two or three years ago, and have not
received IT. The Judge stll has the under con-
siderahon-Ne1 York Tribune.