New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, 1866-09-17
Eeudl Nolifes.


N THE SUPREME COURT Of the State Of New
1Yolk-o FRANCS sANDOw Leldn, You LeTs5gs am y
sCnEPP pisisiia wfieh III be aled IN:
he Once Or the Cok Of said Court al: U. s. Rev stamp:
sRl SS serve a con p ~ you city .. S Ss ,s ss d
s zoe e hroaSn. n t t en-, o, so2 os .i ay day.
atei t-e ,syee hereof upon you, exclusive Of nc 10y 0,in
twenty days aG, service hereof above roluied tie 90
tie sefa sar Saadfpd and ayigf do VIII ,ere %
The costs q this asonDDsied a. EesYors' J9y s. iss5
ELsoS SMITH /. ,I!a,ia ;, ASI7s{ E Of
TIC coz ini 10 his ,eeton wa hiei IN taOls l'hs e.
to- 9y I County Of Noyqr o. Shift e. s dI n AR Roy
RI Y. ,SUPREME 'COURT.-THE CHESHIRE
IN. GOLD AND SILVER MINING COMPANY Psnla ag1a'.
REUBEN HATCH Defudan.-Summon. for meney demand on
You ar heryby summoned and required % ~ ntei Rev.
s srsf t eo d , s09 TaeS WI O m css,d
e eo ~ e S S York si ne CITY i an ~. Y ,s
coy on the aa s1' tb SiPJ Bosd
you exclusive o the diy o'eeh eryios and m 10
tie said complaint within the time afofeaad tie plain N
thousand Que hundred do With E,iss i6n lie ~ q
ssd dGusm 1e4,ipl oa
SHERWOOD Rowland, rl,iniia'. Attorney.
The complain, is action was filed IN e q tho rk Of
Az. 21 Law 6vM
CUPRENiE COURT, City aud County of New,
HENRY i LYONS 6LLARp RICKETTS, ~, SIM
SID GAEs s6. s sHSl Oh 9's c a %
hereby summoned
require tic complaint in this action wch WI De
flied IL the Office II he Cek City sad County NY at
te City Hall city and to Of answer 20 w
said.oopant tie suiscrbT at HE Office Nos nd toaa
You exclusive the day Of such service and you to
ho said sut tie time Aforesaid the paiHh IA
this action will take udrmsnt against for tho or three o
sand hundred ud yo dollars aud cy0no cents Win
eight hundred sxtyvc. and 1913 20 from the BIN daJ
April onethousand eight hundred and pesee tho costs ana
disbursements Of this action JAMES CLAIM,
Plaintiff Attorney, Nos and Broad street NeT.YoFk
TAI Eo4icrfhsi the compliant IN entitled aoiou
hei the Of heck o. tue City and County 4 Ne OK a.
JAMES CLARK. Plaintiffs Attorney.
Auso IswowM. Nos isad Broad ,ireet. New .yoIt
'CUPREME COURL-SAMUEL. S. DOUGHTY
- end FRANCES A. his Wife Plaintiffs against GERTRUDE
RAY WARD, ANNE CATHANlNE WARD and ELIZA ;.
DOUGHTY Defendants fastioun pursuance OF Judgment
Supreme OF tho Slate Of NewloiE made and encfe 10
the rled the 2JL day Of June 1880 l. DANIEL
T. kGEAHA tie Referee Ell In said judgment VIII expose
public auction WEDNESDAY Tie Ot DAY Of fcpien
ber the Eyehsnge SsesooH' No ~
Broadway City Cud County Of hes lork by JANIS ~
MILLER, Aucii0nreg The following desshcd rrcmie-, VI. Az
those thfe Ccru lots pcea o. ground situate yins an
and foTtiesee IA tho City OF NcwiofE which, being TAX no
gehcr bounded end described ioows BesnIug 81 point ~
lie eastery line OF JIdaycuac nineteen iee .ouleiy zen
formed blythe utersecilno the d rHfry line
o. fceh-see' d % the center
wal erected and hcuce eascf hro ign
with Fofethstfc frycuty1c
fofieth
line OlItifda
tle1cs norhery along satl easiey he OF lhyenue Icy
and Of inch 10 the place Of beguuing together WIN
Al singular itamcuts and appfcrluces Leelno be
longing in snyw'e apperenng-Dsed NEWTON AuSa" H.
DANIEL P. ISGRAHAM, IT,. Referee No. lo6 Broadway;
,. l. sLossoE ESQ, Hiutf.s Attorney Al3 lswSwA
--..-.