Daily Davenport Democrat. [volume] (Davenport, Iowa) 1864-1874, 1866-09-10
JUDGMENT AGA1NST RAD1-
CAnsnAMs

} g. DesM EN- NeaAuN0A s~M
TIE Daily Ners. New York paper.
links it was happy day Tor the Republic,
lnd an evil day for the Radicals. when the
leaders " that faction determined on -,
gressivc policy scairst tho President. In !
their ni.Ac and fana'icism they Over es'ima>
. gl tle;r gvn strength aud understandable
oha.asar. tie nitl.c~, and The resources II
t;ie iaan against whom they leyeicd theirs f.
tih,ry vi ab sc and v,,ihcation. They lad
Jus sasa,i,y enough 10 recognize in Andrew
Johnson an individual who, by virtue Of h's
oiiieiil position. could aspire to lead . Tmp-
uiar IN ,ycuen, aud that movement taking
its direction against their faction. they
thought NY crashi the head TO destroy tl'r
vitality Of the b"dy. But they have had I"
deal with energies. with a force ofwil. with
an Independence Of character capable OF
w!th>tsn din, the rude shock Of Of their dcs
p rate ass ,uli-. and nov the shafts OF Their
can't and malice recol upon themselves
AMI furnish the most efficient instruments
oftheir dlscon,!itu
The org ms of these Radical dcmsyog..cs
have AIRED "a question the Ptc'dsn,'svs.s-
leg uft,lAi"g plainly To the people upon the
qu sfl,ns ttat afcci their welfare and libcr-
ii =. They seem u have imagined that hs
would quietly accept their insults And WITH
reiati1n, and, Ike ano,hc, Ca sar, cover has
head with the mantle Of official dignity TO
receive their brutal stnb~ They were mi
tsken ii their conception uf the nature Of the
man, OF the requirements oi his Nice and OF
the splrt and att ibutcs Of the American
people. Andrew job ,son has come among
his f,ll ,w-rountrymcn - one Of them. as an
American citizen, entitled 10 free speech,
anl he has spoken freely ard to the pus-
pose. the result has proven that he was
~, mistaken IN his estimate II the Amcri-
CA character. The wrongs that the Radi
Gale have inflicted npon him have becr
among the elements 81 his popularity. A
rctributvc justice has ordained that his en-
einies ahai be weakened in proportion a,
they have sought 20 revi'c and outrage him
lit Is the night OF Congress to exhibit il
congressional speech and legislation q win
dictivc, insolent aud abusive disposition to
ward the Executive. il ~ right Of the Exec
utivc commune directly with the people
and expose the ialsehood. the incsndiari,m
and the treason u his calumniators
Andrew johnson. in appealing directly
and in person to the tribunal Of popular
opinion, has taken the shortest aud sures
way to cas-, himself loose from the slanderI
ofthe Radicals II he were the tyrant an,
usurpcr that they have declared him to he
10 could no. even with safety 90 among til
mul,,u,,cs, from city to city, FROM village I
village, confronting the masses and telln
them in plain, honest. emphatic sontenc,
his convictions, his purposes, all that h
has done, and all that he intends 10 do. II
has not spared the Radicals; he has DE-
nonnccd them. he hes called the populacc I
witness their revolutionary record. he Id
given them "a Roland Tor their Oliver, stil
in no instance, has lie received from III
popular yotcc token Of dissent, in no j..
slancc has he failed To receive the ~ ontan,
an uncqn,vocal aud Loud muuthed appr.
l,a,ian ani applause ot the Iopu'Atiors tn
n em' ] d 10 give him greeting. The,
s,rnS mr. orarular. The doom Of t.. RAJ
cal faction is sealed They are tvrc iig j,
Tie MI oi the pc" lie dcmAnda their tau Il
inrW hom the political arc ~.
Nae Er,iG ~ o"l mmA vvDOlrm'
A. ,hc lniiIi h,a. which passed the lion
81 Se' tsen atycs, has been pc ,rrnei
the S,na'c 10 ne next session of Congre>
there Is time Er It's further consideration |
Ia r0rp5 /. to whose attention we rrrou
III. I'd iar Chewing extract iom the Mas,
chh- -, Foreman
ne dnt, 90 woolens, by the new bill,
10 b. rs tesi,s per pound, ard - per cent
IN ,hsr n 1900 hroaicmih invoccd
81. v,l psy n dul, Il - , per ward.
vhch u.,.>i v, added, - ,idu,ct protection
the coy and chs grs # lie Importation
fr,isu c,.ihs. aud hc mereLanl's profit
nei thar ." ~ % per cent, maxim u
d7trti ana iudte,i pro-, ction OF sin
va i snrh ,i"'h 81 ~.
,a,d ., such III ~ hroadco'h u
pure, o make Il u pounds OF the ra
VAN. sneh ~ nov being impor, 4 {
bro DEB, h, n, the exact cost ~ Suu
Auiyrl ii lit anil 10 ceu,S per pennd
The p,"pn~,d TN subjects THIS wool TO
duty al 10 ce.ts pr y .und and 10 per Gel
vi Na'esem therefore thu protection
wol-g over Ill have against two and On
hall pounds Of such line Wtsl t,f t
tirty l. ever pad. amounts TO only % GET
AM : nn!ls. whsir the manufacturer v
hayr $, II protection, eight times a. M,
~ the farmer has on ~ pounds of su
wol. We believe. ~ has been Justly :,
IN your columns, that il u M"re work
grow the wool a.. a yard Of cloth than /,
10 make the wool into the cloth.
1--WE regret HIS & eat inequality OF !
ties. because II dues g'eAt mi as,icc 10
more impo tint ci two OF osr great patio
iniu~trcs We also regret Il b Cause
very high q ny o" cloths will create Z
noply, make the peoples clothes more
pen>ivs than Is necessary to enable the n.
uiacturcrs to rc.lize great profits, and Vi
no revenue. while Tic very low duty on v
will not secure oar own market as It sho
TO our own manufacturers alike, or add
trit!c to tho revenue from imp0, ted voc
which will grow constantly cheaper as
production ui cotton increases.
"One half the proposed duty on wool
aud double that on wool, would have
duccd the price Of such cloth. ~ ~
named. neary 81 pcr yard, aud incres
the revenue from 40 !. and heea suflici
protection to manufacturers. With which
Eaelishman could compete and live
The Eenimns Threw Cola Wat
On the Radlca1s.
Al recent meeting Of Tie feuian Brot