The Union and journal. [volume] (Biddeford, Me.) 1858-1882, 1866-07-27
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT.
LAW TER M .
wrsrrns DISTRICT. PORTLAND. JULY, 1850.

The following are the York County cases when
have been argued at the present session OF tho
Supreme Court, sitting In Portland, to hear ques'
lions Of law arising In the Western District, !.
John &. sayward, Sur. Part; vs.. Daniel MARI , q
~ent, KsnnsSunk port. bes, iih, is,o. I'VE have
his S.y examined the accounts between US ana
Me.srs Lewis sayward and ind due them oai-
ance OF en-, MAJ w,,dn
n Inc above is y promssory note the PHI Is en-.
titled 10 Judgment; II not. 1t Is barred by the
statue OF Limitations.
Edwin D. Smith for PIE . non,,. sor def,,.
co. Mary Jane Allen. Applt:, ys; Ana Allen.
Appeal from Judge OF Probate neSla.nE ,ss lii
of their father was Intentional. The verdict o. the
Jury sustained the view Of tho Judge OF Probate.
ho"a'u 0''"'e' drew & Hamilton.
To be argued In writing. w u
20. York Co. Mutual Fire Ins. Co.. w. WE. f. :;
Abbott. On assessment. PITT nonsuit In Court
below.
To DO argued In writing: vu,.
n. YORK Co. Mutual Fire Ins. Co., vs.. Ehis
Dodge. On assumpsit. Pie nonsult In eou'' %
Low. t4.
-. Nathaniel Brackctt VS.. Joseph Rdlon
Question as ~ validity OF appraisers, return on
levy snaS s,y mss.S stated tha, il was ths estate
In fac simple OF the debtor" without saying whetn'
q, II was held ain severalty or In common, IN pos
session.. reversion or remainder" Ssrd'cs oeio"
Was fhr def.
A'"'" - ' Drew Hamilton. Moore.
Submitted on brlefs. nm. .l" .,,,
~. Asahel Goodwin VS.; George I,owden. sun ~,
FIR money alleged 70 he placed In dcfts hands tOi
the pltI by one FAmsielli detenco revocation
answer, the appropriation was irreVocaoio' Ar
gued: -, '' No. u.u,,ton.
"a. Geo w. Bruce vs.. Nathaniel D. Clark. 40
tion OF Trespass uuare clausum. Verdict TOT piti
sT Motion FOR new trial and exceptions ou
Were allowed 10 give their estimate Of tho amount
of damsy. done. Argued. Motion and exceptions
oysrTuled. Judgment on verdict; IL, . s,,,,,
Is. fransis GuiImond VS.. Enoeh II. Mckinney.
Action TO recover for PITTS, services. verunct ,o'
si31.ls Motion for new trial ana exeeptions.
Argued. Exceptions overIIied Moson ,1 nf Ier.
diet before second day Of next term: N s,,,,,
7S. stephen Thompson y, Jedediah PsIkis g, and NJ
si: sp pR,: vote Hss'In in Nos sSS non.at
Court below, except and files motion 10 uism,ss
because Il appears that jud sment was rendered oy
the Trial Justice vs. defendants o. Ms" s,a
~ ..s a, % non:ss Sy BOarno Esq
DAn' ''U'A w. - drew a Hamilton.
n. Edward Mcbride VS. WIN. Y; Gol!hwait,
a little strip Of rock down 10 the Pool. NerilG'
WAS for deh, pl.f aled motion for new trial.
Argued. Motion oyerruled. Judgment on YER
diet ,,.-, N ,,.,,.
~ and 10 VIM. g. Wakefield VS.. Inhabitants oil
nncbunkport. VIM. Perry vs. same; 0n notes
given to men procuring substitutes. verdiets Tor
p!trs and deits except To be argusWH 10 n wns
~. jas Roberts vs.. Jane NJ. llanscomb and al.
To he argued In writing. y,
81. WIN. II. Mason, vs. Lorrnso D. Staples. Writ de
homne rplesiapo. M nonsuit below and accepts IL
be argued in writing.
Jno. NJ Goslwin. Edwin ~ snnn.
s. Alfred Chesey In equity, Vs. Isaac NJ Chhord anu
al tn be argued In writing.
4. Eastman 4 Son. Jno VI uooawm.
IS. VIM II. Cutler, by next friend, Helen Il. Cur.
r Aminist,srix Action g. ,sSo,s. r,a n Sn' AMI
hni In k'Ti1ebunkport. Verdict below was iOr Pun, anu
defendant excepted. Argued.
81 Nathan Dane and al, petitioners f'r iaulamus, vs.
siss Derby ami ais. This Il the Alfred election case Ar
pane BSurue, Drew Hamilton,
D,vi. Kimhall
IS. Hanson Clements and al, vs. Vim. Gap.'l;
SS' Josepl, w Hanson vs. City Of Bddefori. Iepor,
Of Committee on catioa Il way accstel by the Judge
at Nis prus, and plGs. excepted. kimnaii, Ca Any
D,,x 4 Hamilton. Edwin II. Smith.
s., oscan Dsns Va. Luther s. Moore. On note Of hand
judgment v. deft, who excepted.
Dane x Bourne, Moore, Drew iamu'on
S. joel H. M0ulton W. Inhabitants Of Sanford This
case ms been tried four tines resulting In four vercs ~,
plsutif AMI one disagreement Is SUIT Tor personal
Injury through defect Ia highway, Tor which ael town
ilb,e PIT moves fOr new trial on grOni q naeqaiey
Of damages. ,,,
Kimball, Edwin II Smith. Low, Drew Hamilton
So Geerge H. Craig vs.. L>-nard y. Bean khtered ny
den, on complaint Of nOn entry by ph Suit was fr u
r. AMI venlct for def. III excepted, but has not en-
tered the case judgment on the verdict
Eiwin n. Smith. Jno' VI. upNm.
joseph Dale Samuel 7. Shannon Complaint iof non
entry, as In prec~llns case.
Jno. N. GOODWIN. :. W. b"l"'s-