Baltimore daily commercial. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1865-1867, 1865-12-01
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURTS.

TUESDAY, Nov. 80. 1865.
Criminal Cour.-IIon. Judge Bond.-George c.
Maund. Esq, Prosecuting Attorney.
c. H. Dryden-before reported. Case argued be-
fore the court by the States attorney, Mr. Maund
and the trayerser by Messrs. Archibald Stirling
Jr;, and John II. Ing. Held curia. Chas. Singewald
rell. Postponed. Patrick Mun gave bail in the
sum of $500, with Owen MeEnany, for his appear
sum of $500, with Theodore Bushmiler, tor his ap-
pearance to answer the charge Of illegal voting The
court adjourned to Satu. day.
Circuit Court-Hon. Judge Alexander--Lydia II
Bartlett, ct; al vs. VIM. E. Bartlett bill for sale of
certain real IS estate devised By VIM Il Bartlett de-
legacles. Nancy Z. Adams vs. Charles IL. Adams.
decree of divorce a uinenlo motrimonii. Mary II.
In this case the Court filed the following opinion The
respondent recovered before Justice of the Peace
costs each against complainant for the alleged viola
tion of the ordinance to restrain gambling. The com
plainant appealed to the Criminal Court of Bati-
ant then sought still further appeal to the Court of
Appeals. and rendered bond to stay execution pend
ing this last appeal which being desired. he files his
bill in this Court and seeks by of Injunction to
delay the executors on the judgments in the Cr mnal
Court until his appeal to the Court Of Appeals can
be had and determined Whereupon this court passes
its order setting the application for injunction down
for hearing and the parties have been heard and sub
have been determined upon appeals as provi-
ded for by law, that is final and conclusive
upon the parties. But the complainant THINKS
BY the provisions Of article 5, appeals, Code
Court of Appeals. If this be, so-and this Court is
not called on to decide whether it be or not-the
section 81 of the article provides the only
that is an approved bond whereby execution can
be stayed or delayed pending such appeal. But
again, complainant says Criminal Court refuses TO
accept such bond and insists that he is entitled to
Injunction, and at ain his object by the substitu
peal bond in the Criminal Court, and thus by indirect
means reach purpose refused him by direct means.
This doctrine cannot be admitted it is in direct
hict with ancient and honorable maxim of the
law and would be an unwarrantable interference by
this Court with the jurisdiction of the Criminal Court.
The only remedy of the complainant, if he has any
and he cannot, in his Interpretation of article s.,
General Code of Laws-is by writ of mandamus from
the Court above to the Court below. Certainly the
bill presents no case whatever for the interference of
this Court. Injunction refused.
Superior Court-Hon. Judge Martin.-George
Gildersleeve vs.. the United States Telegraph Com
pany. Action of aSsumpsit. On trial.
Assignment AIS to $40 inclusive; 1853 specially as
signed.
United States Circuit Co,rt-Judge Giles.-Eman-
uel Justh VS.. Solomon Hillen, Jr. garnishee of J.
hillen Hunter; attachment on Judgment. Not
concluded.
Court Of Common Pleos-Hon. Judge King.-Wm.
Hamilton VS.. Hugh Gelston; before reported Yer
dict for defendant.
Hugh NJ. Allen vs.. Henry S.!Taylor; suit on nm
open account. On trial
Orphans Court-Hon. Judges Audoun, Supplee and
Edwin Dorsey, deceased, granted to VIM. ]. Ward
The will of Chas. Merryman admitted to probate
and letters estamentary granted to Mary A. Merry
man and O. P. Merryman.