The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1865-01-07
HIRAM KAUFMAN, VS.. WIN. G. MOSS and

IL FREDERICK DAWSON. In the Circuit
Courtfor Baltimore county, IN equity.
The subject of this suit is to procure decree
tor the sale of certain personal property con-
veyed by Frederick Dawson to William C. Moss,
for the benefitof Dawsons creditors, in Novem-
Der, 1860, and a subsequent conveyance to j. Il.
Patterson in November, 1862. The bill states
the execution of the conveyance by Dawson to
Moss, and charges that Moss has wholly neglect
ed the duties of the trust, that the trust prop
erty has been left in the custody of Dawson,
who isausng and dsposng Of the same at his
pleasure, without accounting to any one, and
that the same is in peril Of being wholly vast
ed and lost to the creditors. That said property,
consists in part of farm stock, perishable in its
nature and liable to depreciation in value. That
said Dawson is utter insolvent, and that the
nterposition of this court is necessary and in
dispensablo for the benefit of the condition and
70 savethe trust property from waste and de-
struction.
And the bill further states the execution by
said Dawson of mortgage Of all his personal
property aforesaid, on the farm aforesaid, in
November, 1860, to j. II. Patterson, to secure a
note PAYABLE on demand That the property UNI
der this mortgage has been left in the use and
possession of said Dawson. That such convey
ance to Patterson was voluntarily made to him
der and delay this complainant and other cred
itors in the collection of their debts against said
Dawson. The said mortgage is expressly made
subject 10 the QecQ OF trust 10 NOSE III charges
upon belief that the larger portion of the debt
to Patterson has been paid, and that the exis-
tence and continuance of such mortgage wholly
prevents complainant and other creditors of the
said Dawson making their money out of the
property of said Dawson, all of which is Cow
cred by said conveyances. And it is ayerred
that in using and disposing at pleasure of the
property thus mortgaged, the same will be Who'll
~ wasted and lost to the creditors of said Daw-
son.
And the bill prays, thatthe trustee, VIM. c.
Moss, may be required to give bond as such or
that he be removed from the trust and that
receiver be appointed to take charge of the per-
sonal property aforesaid in said conveyance
mentioned and for further relief prays than an
order of publication issue against said William
c. Moss, who is a nonresident of the State OF
Maryland, requiring him to appear and answer
the allegations Of the bill, and show cause If
any why relief should not >be granted. And
prays for subpoenas against said Moss Patter-
son and Dawson.
It's thereupon ordered by the Court this 2sd
dag Of December, 1864, that the complainant by
causing a copy of this order to be inserted in
some newspaper published in Baltimore county,
once week for four successive weeks before tie
first day of February next, give notice to the
said William c. Moss, to be and appear in this
Court to answer on oath the premises and show
cause if any he has why the relief prsy ed should
aet be granted, on or before the second day Of
May, next .s.z
q y RICHARD GRAsoN.
True copy-Test
JOHN H. L0NGNEcKRR, Clerk.
nao 2n