New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1865-03-10
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPERIOR COURr--ClRcrrr-MARcu 9-Defose JuItice
MCCusy.
Charloa Nil IhArn Inn

btrEhOh WI hi-SincVII-"AA'n '-'e''No '""SS
Charles ONr! sst Theron Lose
This was an action for damages upon contract
Juy 1881 !. Sheh wctbe nour hal risru considerably IN
,.li. Tie Dc fspdan end.s'rei .Gss sa,.. M o..
Of lie eeur snd that lie contract benr tor cist on delivery
the h nn bound 70 off. or pay toe money oeoIg de-
Gss, q so; The s S.sa ~
on, 10 him, and oaeto submit the matter g the AI9
zion cOau'sse Of The Com h1ehse 1hs Court he'd Ihs'
pie. o. similar nori bs,r cen tie iI ian = July The
Jury I.ss,,eI srd ssns, re #s' "
THR STRONG DIVORCE SUIT.
Peter sops -; M.y r. c wse on sss s
c.a =. c..9 ,h~ snsrl fos s plaintiff, asked for a.
.sn., rira could DO tried. and is grounds,nsss and
poper showD In.uPP0r oib meti0a To made The follow
cay aad County Of ysr York I. Peter R. s,foas IN the
Cory n Queens and STATE Of New York psu,if ia the
sbo,e,ni,ed seton being ABLY sworn ..i,h .. ..i .con
obtaining divoIos from tho defendant on the ground
d sety, that 'neh sdnry oecme kuown depone Q. on
and that tie fact Of il. eonmon by her AID OF efalna
connsrion eon,nred Tor nearly two yesr. Immediately Pre-
tho defendant TO this dsrss-n', snd also; he
1o .s ed Ssy S 70 e%S' OF her rs.
that q, hp, asfesssnt slowed sns q ,he decpr,t
hDu.on e0sS5 S and q, 20
and that d. trusting thereto and also relying npn ne
Of her family, who swae OF the scts that bis
claim Tor yorce should b. affected by delry In prose-
ing such claim snd ,h. defense would be interpossd
and moved BY f.en confederation for his children and for
his aud defendants family did TOT tho Of
nmAs enor conceal her shame by resd under the
roof with her aud his chden. but eeeupyns separate
spap marital relation, with her, and 40 Jar -
~ dssnap behavior thai her sed and that
disposed 10 exhibit spirit OF defence utterly incoD
ent win her former professions he found impossible TO
continue the EFFORT and h,r.fora sbaed. ned ~ ,h. as depo
nent BELIEVES d-ndsn change OF behavior from hopes
he her BY counsel fhst she might safe said
attitude Of dehsncs on certain trchnies grounds Of deens
especially tue supposed difficulty OF proeafn. legal proof o.
her guilt depon+h, frher cay. that TIE answer OF said de-
endan which i 20, pnasI oath dsnr: the adasr Shared
been eomns u has bsn psrioned and coudcned by tbis
Of the sou in
between this deponeht and tho defendant With tho OBJ
' so ,Si bs;~sen asossDs and d. dr.n without
proceengs and without msAns The zeal oands OF SUCH scp
Thai with the sole object Of preventing such publicity
drpon,nt repeatedly ohs!si to was hi, tsh, to dyeres
given him. stating tn. Tina that hi. ercIaave legal
right 70 soch custody being secured he wozd exercise his
children such discretion to be regulated by and upon tbs
the children and tbs future condbct VI the defend
this action wa. not un dponent had
all acquiring the custody OF his two daushte BY NO
Drponen, further .si,b that s~r the commencement Of
THE action and on The 9Th day OF Juns 1854 be cspsed wit
be served The drfenA requiring her 70 produce dspon
r daughter Alice then aged that the defendant and
a. A ., s;ss 4 q: as':
Of June the secretly said house nS ssd Aee
using ii. utmost rso. to discover ~Srse s as."Ssn IL.
residing OF where h: said child has bssn sscrced by
family who were examined under osih IN the courss
subsequent proceedings under said writ Of fabeas
S.4 s
DpOrs further on OF .bou, the 18Th IA. q SEP
IT, a.. y s,ss .S @
ssvs announcing the Of bis Said child having occurred