New-York daily tribune., 1865-12-29

SSr on be tves and In the evening did he thing
She lived his fe day IN and day out 2 of
and she wrote in this hsho"n language. !. "ooiI os
~ eIea Ssy M sOhs ,rt every way different and there
is similarity between them. Counsel dwe a. T1nsloesoo m
e,denSe Whatever a these procured in
Thar Ts, sSt chance a s s Been ana
and distinctly proved and no ,Ssdp4S SexplSna9a ,n vi" ags s
s0ncc that csse @ne ercums.nce aos0 a PROOF Of
guilt that k bel gh. and conceamen-a eoneeslnent is'!
ifbee innocent no one wouAaare take her child from
her she would stand her ground ace the nvestsaton ana
dive and y r ssn from he s Rsbe%. eopp Ssr bda
on child and her fight are utterly inconsistent WIN
n for the rebuke OF the Judge bench this act Of
stealing portion of the litigation and turning our trump
defendant had her choice to swear to her innocence
or guilt or not to do So bgt thsy dare , no nss saS
TIE story Of the rape true or the moment yog eee mo yy
lence ,he sa remains Sga The la. ths s oa h %
We presented case as Ice from any 'hins a
pruhent any similar case ,ha' ever cae m ,bo;r p
After three DAYS of violent dennnSlsloh ehu l'us % - %
books they ca the 6F,t material wif, tne a'nea ndn &
and he is examined What do we hnd' daughter rav.,hed
solemn terrible meeting 6}ween IsI 1 ie, m ro5 111 og o
lion or iusiihc tion l.ls irom her ip' Ihai Is
You NAV bring sonsinaw and daughters aw presidents Of
bks and defendants of revolutionary ifes they may he
WORD Of excuse ever icl from the lips OF that daughter l
vss dismissed into obvion-banhed forever and no word
o. lo 1 the ter n- That had been done her
Thcv said one but Chm tian heroic wou!d make h
ron,.son. What conessionl That she raped Would
that be an Of Christian lerosm II was simply her duty
10 ten ii such crime had been committed ON her
Then comes the testimony Of the brotAeTsinaw, who re-
psod mention the details Of the crime and advised Mr.
srong get divorce in another state Ihe nony
dismiss IS unnecessarily inoducea INTO ,le case ana Issiy
amounting nothing shall not anything On the snhjec
Of cennys4ee wQud be wanting p TePee' to my client If
Mr Cram then renewed the iepo,ons of NJ Hccksher,
who coming into the case poH hisr tam after the sly
Then cane MARY smith and Mr.. Wash the after Of whom
did not ke adultery though size had nothing to say 20 abor
isted between Ler and Mrs Potter. Counsel next went
into tie case Of rope endeayorni to prove iis NteI
!, & suppoed IA his that there was IN abortion aid
the utmost length which It has gone ha this defendant
produce abortion on hcre was rot an seor
,ion Al a It miscarace aud no human being has
proved It anything else Toe woman Of az Others who
could prove The truth ay o this chaIc Is li stevens
she is absent But such crime was never committed
attempted and ,tren-e d. II ~ s'nd neIe TO d9y 10
defend her irom ihs additional cme' 'ondp Ie coh.lo %
fthe Pstih he cannot come 5f'. a. wine, ,i @ Dv,
Conse thcn referred 10 the question Of syoue alleging
that tAeIe wa 10 pioo' n. & ~. ~ i1n nv
expr.s proof MI the witness brous, TO prove
stet. there was 10 be c1nceallneu'a shifting. drifting
Enthusiastically the interests the witness has
a. ~ - no., bis terre o. ir.t;ce That one esrrcs.
sion, appear 20 tie wor a. uln aud wife l. fatal o theu
he he & s rS1e 0e'1 fr}n Wh,see o,h Is to aow
J His mind is disomvesei by the immense. imaginary
iner.- family honor, Ac he tbnk "a steae. Tie
whole tenor OF Tie testimony o. Morris mi Heckhr goes TO
:how s, 'ae5e wa 70 & osy,ne, TS 5 % 5s s - YSs, s
honor please lave only w woIds more 10 ay on the only
reIisiur or-rc+o tie case tie recrnhtory charge o sdiE
tery Before sidegns the evidence tAs point call tie
So,hs Is more improper and indecent than rd-,ns those
who were cxceced wituestes in this suit The effect
| Of the Indictment Of Mrs Potter j., Alt the yeiy
counsel who indicted her re'ls,s 70 ru Ler .he stand
Is
put the stand. Every word she wood utter - ibis
sSnd woud he oerwaId u.,d aslins her One word a 70
the ery Of wtnesse 1T grave sbectsn ofense 20
yoa the ilry to the J1dgs 20 every citizen That pose
cp wa wa Sy e M Mo?Gi y o. u5l ',s s is S
and sid tha, lie pad 5000 % counsel - tic ele aui
purpose he did no, know. That Provo l-,.s pid
Vow JoiS to al i. sad to tho ronprodae''$
Of 'Nr. Massie. although ,he ". he.e IN e.s.i
/. true. You the two Of them In court Mas'ie ~ ';'
and pesrs-bes. oyeyayd ne Oyer Iooi .I3 yu NV
been applied each get them u ,euy he o.e by money
,ne OUR & oy & isS seod % Nor H.. ySs need o SeI to
oaef Of provirs boeks Of Esr,s Hotel bribery
%.n sna y Soa I 20 bse7e them vriuou I5I ac their aco
There in TINS city wlo are yd re diem or setting
:, To se BIT Can 90 into Jccc,ivs 5ce IN Brosd
svsy oas o o6''1s Ia e
an si5es IN this case, bat Jon Is the only wl ssh
whoe we been favored II they have brbel ono
The ine, smith pGoyos the adultery Now Mrs. Potter.
" Iore f house II M ne because very respectable
e lived there. The ui.donagy there. .azinli
nd Iva there. and another woman, KeedIum, .ush;e
c. he Loa sMfs. wash tleiI main witness eF house
he ndre4 y sef'yne. sy NJ n0oT'ss Th0 oIdsed TIE
s PIooi Of mpopHy tat hey sought 20 bring esaig his
Is. S,rougs duty 20 house visits are
al consistent with innocence lie tue agent q the house.
d. not paid at all h utterly exploded Eares ip foF rent
produced Of Itself proof pcsumpye that the Il the
ngiI aid grr Tna
to aladius to Mf. Daily lie IS my profession
Of and indeed an sorry TO that have proved bin
q 4 charged with committing adultery with a womsn
Cd enough according to their theory 10 be Grandmother
81 who ed 10 Sc her Any one WHO vi-Ied 10 .ee NJ
"a into that wAeie adultery committed often.
tn livery door j. open We red to hut one he door bot
anything done in corner IL done both before
to & is 'I enc woe hsn s Theh hey eyed he paPEs on
isan and again aud again. md committed this crime three
% nesa moe nonsil9gs unherd Of proportion never
o is pusmour 10 The most indignant terms Thai k not ib
= a Of sit.r t,.t man re. TO woman That Las posss
hjs psrn,aour In the Indignant terms. That Is not th
Kind letter that WI tes to wosn that has posses
viii whom be was sleeping Under such relation, they
q not eo9It bad & ssgey s, We yyrSS % "a &c 5o
was ever dcreditod before She acknowledge IN her and
Wit that she carried of the Instruments that wer'
~ she proved nothing On her crossc1amination de
1t suoycd her cIodibliy 20 that mo 10 iny wou'
p sen and they Of her that she had seen h stIor
ss M1Poter AID When essed her, she did not W" 20 zee
their s touch fhe said You remember Whit fbe told yot
about Der belief that a hTt she cid not believe the thn2
against Mr Strong; that she did rot think ln Etn Of th
Kind disdain 90 hager the small msit's that dtcred
her Her lite her history her pushs her contradiction by
Dey, all 30 TO show It. The way IN which he ,etm'ny
.he sck n she said ,oi" she was heart od yet un
willingly she gives you The eA'iTs proof Of ne 'nHe
7 me I,-A Z.