, 1865-07-21
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
Heavy Penalty for False Resenue Returns
Complicated Diyefee Case-A Lawyers Dlf-
fienity-Adullory and CruetI-Wits
Of BlbeAs corphs-lllegality Of
Arresllng 4 Policeman.

uKI7ED STA1E8 N0uE1-Og1fc vRQ4e AEu"
snond.-Joxeph q. stolp, we'll known 'wooten
zapu!actuief Of this s,ate, appeared 10 answer 70
= charge msde BY the District Attorney. in m &C.
uon !or debt, charging him with mixing fslse re-
lu1ns Of his monthly manufactures to the Rave
nue. Lt1ccr. The defendant confessed Judgment
In the cAte, when Judgment was rendered By the
CONT 10 the auonnt Of f5'oo to cover bis desal-
jain Mack, Ct Galesbu.e, confessed judgu.nt
n The charse Of selling ltauor without license.
Phiness O'DornsIl, 4 wsTon msker Of .his city,
hh*lea BY the Distinct Attorney for carrying on
his bu1i1css without the regulate Government
hcen.c. eonies:td Judgment to the amount OF
Assbel Cas.1e, aszslsned npon the charge OF
vSsnx H. e a"s ps se nG qads
centessed Judgment The Court assesseds ane
1.l:cit highvtncs. made in This civ by tho
4. vcup+ Uf1c. u, ISL hatrel-, claimed by r
Wilson & Co.. were Yesterday re!easee n possa-
surIA.os couRr-Bvors .sdqe oary.-oer.
Edeus, neai LenoEt, IN thts county, was brought
tulo court upon witt Of hooe0s eorput from the
County IMI. Vhefe he had been incarceIatsd upou
chsrxe OF threatening TO ass&uS and kill bis wife
With deadly weapon. or rather combination Of
dt adly wespone-a run ard rope. After co1sid~
etsnon, The Court ordered The dasebasge Of ne
1izsDce In the pepal sum OF t5t0 to appear At the
September term OF ihe Circuit Court, 70 answer
to an, indietment th.. may be returned @ a1s,ast I
i bili pr, tne for dIyo.ee vs.. fled By Seth !.
! eronnd Of deserttoa. The petitioner in hts snl-
dssis asserts thst be ns5r1sd W. M9e. n 1sas
tand mt My. 1865. when ehe left her home and
| rejnsed 10 reside with him. II we mts'ske not,
Sou,l tn he same posilon theJ now oceupY. In
Msy, 1853. IN affidavit was f.ed In the Circuit
Ccnrt By Seth ]. c. Luthe. applying loF dsvoree
adulsery 10 This ball the defendant dlea her -,
aver denying the charge, md Aleo ef2ss PHI q
divorce aRa1sst he. husband shargas ,h h1 con n.a
sveTru;ed G r. s1a thioxn oal upon ,he gtouad that
e Mis Iaher 9asn lid
| ID amended bill charging the complainant IN lbs
81, n e IL ssi1 uss4 ia
second answsr derylnR the accusation IN tots.
Tbs ease sppes1s then 70 havs dsoppedId,esd
which pad ehArseter.zea IT, No decree ofdlvotee
Eas ordered. and the lutt was forgotten. usttl .ts
Iseal}sd H. r. presitons
s,,s X y Ras t. a.st T.?
the alleged desetao1 tn ne sesoaa Tna;d 1, ses en-
withdrawal oI Mrs. 1nther from her ho ne at the
time when her husbsna nrsttnsdtuted legal pro
| q
twenty yesrs matrimonial nc.
nied e ); ;'1s,z B.snt; tPp1a M nd
william c. Caroihers and Peter D. Green. setting
forth tbe following alleged state 81 facts:
. P1a nhfs elatm that On ne IAN Of Febrn1fy
| F. Johrson, deemed It Necessary during MS 40
stnce from the city to raise sam Of money, Y
ds.y eons p,sss,lng sms ,.enq!;v aua
which VIE the d. fendant 1gehaft, then sct!ne q
hn1ont agert they ontsned from aoa@sa ia sne
E eent ~ as.ser secured ny VA
rznt Of attorney 'to eonfxsa Judgment thereon
\ Some utn~ eubsequent to thlt date znd prior Il
Interest Of lie nete ron johnson and p.id II =
to ibdc1.s he b,,i in blank :" without recourse.
SIed tie bIxuf. with IN ae.ienment 10 1he defend
ant Ca1othert, ind shortly Afterwards, during tn
o ss ES ss aes ss s ASa e. C.,
appeared IN Court Joshua Knickcrbocket appeal
tn9 for them. eenieseed tndems on :het esha
Though H1hont her .nd .;
Of thaf order the Sheriff attached cettaln Of thei
q p1opt tty and sold It by, apston, the purchaEe
nhoG ie Il nss cersste dc Of eaIs va s1aee
:. Pl.1ntlds claimed that Caro.he1s never paid Y.
hing for the uose bnt th1t + W. ssssned 70 b.,
a oidstssudinr % I % ths@. also thst the purchase {
!, tho atsact ed property b{ Green ~ not oan
j. ade tran.action, bns that he made prete1ds
with The eaine fsnduIent intent alleged N II
/, cthtr Cste- They further astert that they koe'
nothing Of the e1it against them, nos dia toe. ~ r
painsnts AK tho order Of the Court far the deli'
j En- xId cancellation OF the Sheri6s certificate
4 sale to Gre*p \. tlto IN tt1upcnon fesnnaaaG u -
D fer OF deposition Of the cernncse peiof 10 e
p; | order OF The C0ust, ard perpetual in1udetlo
I 1ett1ain,Dg III le2at action OF proceed nge upo
!. 4 case in astumpait was commenced BY Roecl
: D. McFarIane, aga1ust Charles z. Water man an
n1ntfp} eaant p} eooSs ~ sF Fes,seres ~ % p. osdsr. w
cult II pies q .1ssp..s On thS ease - & pa & Reeu ~
j Of lie estate Of Chsfles n. Hendereon, deceased
! sRsinet John s. Wallace. forwarding agent an
nYaepx Ct 'nis sgit oefpasz
j prornlses was died By Anton ae1zog ed Asyt y
:: sie.n, sgRinst jacob aud Simon Rosentel. DA7
'fnts n e e asnnies 4 late of The r u ae
sna ,nncfaon ho to - ..saed szssnst Thamsa Y.
RON c,rIJsne On The business, until ssatemel
!. Of The psrtnefth1p accounts hs made. EompshIt
II ri hlso asks tbe appointment Of Arses1ssr 4
y. nc c9scu17 @ % %cogar-B.tors Jldg. EiH!eMsaG'
d Tho morning W1Il,sm Il Cs1nan Aod James ~ u
I! two nenoers Of our e'y police 1efes, He Me
- eaSprs. from The comfy jail, where they b!
= Sr+n fncsrre,ated upon eaptdt applied TOT
fxn nen naued Frank Erezttt and -Eampbe
~ n an seiion for faia. imprisonment. The nsft
NJ iva III the alteRfd wronge Of Messrs. Canobs
IL snn Evtrttt bas already tppeared In Tho TRAUH
~ Fverf,t conpthtt I'd that he had been causelsse
"A | sr,rsttd bT Hzll on the evening Ut tae an
a. Iniy. while watching the fireworks from Mtch &
X AZ, rue. atd Campbell urged that he VIE INC.
n. | crrnteu In the AInory pJ Hall anc Cafman-t
b. Asck up'' ket pet-ioE simply a. k1n& me eau
ia | OF EyeTittts afteet snd volunteering 70 oeool
bail for hts q tas Roee Eo1tt ne 3f
MT po,h men were asustve aud d,soraer'y.
II Thc Petitioners yesterday based theif sppi
til don for re1ease, afst upon the ground 81 toe
tei leped existence Of ons'itutional deleets u !
ae affidavit, but chiefly upon ths NGuon OF !
II amendcd charter which prohibits the arrest.
n, evil proeess, Of public Officers Whue n ne 9:
% cntion Of their du'y- They claimed thlt st
~ | fims nf The srrest botb Wtfs on tnty a1 pol'
ia | n,.n From The evidence edducsd, It hppca
ur- that f.sr1nan vas at the tune oi his arrest,
lie ttnttne to his du lee ~ Turnkey n tne AZ no
70 | and Hail htd {n4t BEEN detl 1sd 10 hunt up 60
na' horse thief .
1.e The c., It In sts decision. ruled THAT a !
cha, ter prohibits the arre.t Of 20 tc:m.n ~ y
nj. pFocee+, while On duty. soch srfes's wee tnes
I'D +nd could Lot I've made. ! he omcEls "ss1
he poted to be, when on duty. working 1os As - -
stt ..th ef RE rGtnmuuiiy, that tatnCt taau ~
In | fele With them, private Interests or sIle9an
ss | must submit to The genera good.
Il The Court believed thte evictrce Gdaocsu .
tts b4 half Of the pr ftl3oncr couc'ustgcy proved
'od 1t the time OF 'hslr eat they vera On tpe
ter j police duty, consequently they Euust bs, IN
tth | the charter, re;easer4 from duty.