Alexandria gazette. [volume] (Alexandria, D.C.) 1834-1974, 1865-12-20
rrrrFR FROM LoupouN COUNTY,:

r,orrasnondence of the Alexandra #Gtzette ]
IEEsBURG, Dec. 22.-At the recent term q
our Circuit Court, Thomas 2. Knox quallIiled
as general receiver and commissioner III Chan-
cery. and Fenton NJ Henderson and Asa Jack
son as commissioners in Chancery. An y, Issue
out of chancery was awarded to try ne TACT
whether the will Of Mohler BALDWIN, years ago
admitted to probate, was the Will OF SAID bald
win or not. In this case the Whoie estate was
left to a negro child. ,
The canse Of Andrew Robey, committee OF
3 Lucinda Rawlings, V. T. NJ. Young, executor
of VIM. Rawlings, was dismissed, agreed
Cooper VS.. Cooper, title to certain land per,
fected and funds ordered to be. paid to general
receiver. Knox. Coe VS. Smith, decree tor an
account. Lacy VS.. Sweret, decree Tor account
and to sell real estate. Luckett vs.. Gullck, de-
cree for account and apportionment and ascer-
tainment of the state OF the funds This means
that the funds were deposited In Valley Bank
and their condition is to be inquired into by
Commissioner Of the Court. Watson VS.. Me
srath. same decree. Brad6eld VS.. Alder, de-
ereee to sell certain tract OF land kabr1ck
VS.. Wightman, decree for an account. Ellis vs.
Clapett, same decree. McKim VS. Heath de-
cree for security for costs James VS.. Andef,
son, decree for absent parties to appear and
answer. Donohoe VS.. Koszel, decree TO collect,
apportion, &c. Craven VS.. S. G. Sinclair, ad,
ministrator, decree for account and report OF
debts. Green VS.. Garrett, decree to collect
funds and resell land. HeMeboWer ys. Houser;
! decree to ascertain state of funds. Worsley vs.
WorsIev. decree to sue on bond Of guardian. =
Carper. VS.. Hixson, decree to sell certain gold
for currency and report. Warner vs.. kephart
decree to collect and pay to general receiver,
Knox. Boss VS.. Wilson, decree for deed to H.
! q. Bowie for house and lotiu Leesburg Gas
seway VS.. Bowie decree to 'lect funds and
hiring into court. Beans VS.. Hatcher, decree
to collect funds deposited in Farmers Bank at
Richmond and report to court johnson vs.
!. Brooks. decree for account. Hammer VS.. lip
nett. recommits report of commissioner with
out passing upon it to settle account Stew
ardson VS.. Hixson, to ascertain state OF funds:
Potter6eld VS.. Potter6eld, decree for sale and
account. Green VS.. Rose decree for report on
STATE of funds. Williams VS.. Williams, decree
to ascertain whether dover lot can be divided
or should be sold Strother's admr. VS., Stro-
Their. law question referred to court OF law
Bowman vs. Glasscock, allows Bowman cred
f. on his bonds for debt and interest due TO
him. Rice VS.. Smith, decree tor mortgage,
annual interest to be paid TO Isaac NJ Rlce ana
principal to his wife. at his death, Cooper vs.
Mann, decree to collect bonds ana distribute
funds. Miller VS. Janney, decree tor tbs set
tlement Of the accounts Of Daniel Janney. ex-
eontors &C. Tayenner VS.. Tavenner. decree
~ collect Mcdaniel VS. Tayenner. decree to
resell re &c. Hizson admr vs.; Bitter, decree
for account, and Luckett Us. Darne, decree 70
collect ard report.
Asher Douiy was seat 70 the penitentiary for
three wears. for horse stealing. and Thomas
for same offence, case continued to next term,
+ Commonyealth's witnesses on spree ana COO
drunk to get to court. =.
At the recent term Of the County Court the
estates Of Horace Luckett ana John r. ofna ar
were committed to the Sheriff with the Wills
annexed; Executors named refused s 70 qually:
If John P. Smart, who lives in Texas
~ ALIQUIs