Council Bluffs bugle. [volume] (Council Bluffs, Iowa) 1860-1868, 1865-09-07

@ view II pretty explicit terms the Iss.
ff.'saaeaa Jaekaau, Eouchirg State Rights
ss aNast ap 20 the year 1894; before gsra.
krrssasg fnstheF, will now spsaTn far !
snoinens 70 add easnpent on " bar is vel
arown - the SaRfA cavolfsa pyoria.
fE1fso"'.a This p#p~r, from ifs date IN
lsSl, has alwsvs hsan io.skad anon isy ts,s
gnErFa of National pswer, 40 = sart os
0vefa1s Jsaimea sgslnst Sfats Riohis-ss
sFft as 4 sBo~s triumphant assertion al
ths powers Of the Gsnerai tioverrrys nng
avsT them. whsnavpr vhs two shaus.s
chance 20 olash. 7his. If well lacked 10.
ssll be found bs no sHeass fyae; nsy more.
thaF uee Jarkson's views of Se.te Rights
wTre afsH sRehasgsd. ard In narfe, keep.
saR with what thay bad hem seer IN be- en-
al other ascasinns. His priacirles were
of ''stetnfr stuff than 10 be diaenncsrt.
ed Fnd iashed at their frsf encounter.
Aa rtgaTt9s the Shufh Uarolira Pyecia.
naiinn Ills well knpwn ifs sssIaoti.es was
- safstce sbe uuiipsi States rpvesae Laws
- Shsfl' sfaa, In opposition 10 an unris
ia y The pennle aRa'nst lha ennxtitai Ell
aa'hoTitifs- NJ nnssr. hawever. YES
claiased againsf SlAfe Right@ sevah3 the
simplf esevalisn Of the lass- admitted 70
he eanAfep ional-an,i sf eour<e, psra-
FHaent toAlI Stste su'hoYitv whatever En
thpr wArTf tha grsss heff Of the PreeIp i
Enafios. Wss directed aesinst ehat waa
called qualification % which was held ri
he nj onee yediaus and unconstitutional
without the slightrsf aim 70 rubvert al
mistei StaAs R}ehts! nr to enirench % sn
ans Of their prit c plies.
T" Fring fairly 10 light The aennp and
parpone nf lhe ErociArnatian. Gen. .Iacg
son shall speak for bimsrif. IL savs:
81 ronsidsr. then. the powsr to annula
inw ~ n" unifed Ssntea assarn a.i nv nne
State. Incompatible arifh the eriueucs of
fbs DniBn rsntrne,rfsd erpresfg bg fhp
lsifs. Of fhe Constitution. tHosffh oyf xsL
oq ifs spirst isarorsdsfeqt Rffh rps Yg pFia
riTls on Thifa IL saas founded. and Ge
srvrfiFs of fas greet ofjest for 8hirh IL
waa fprm d. lire il q Law RI the
United Sssfes. not even pretended IN he
unconstitutional, repealed hy the sufhor
say Of the small majority of the voters Of
. single State. Here In rrovisi N Of the
whith il saleunly ahrnrate,i
by the same authority. &c This, then.
il the position IN which we stand. A
small majority II the c.ti9ons ef one
State in the UHioa hare elected delegates
20 State cnnyet8ian: that Convention
has nrtiaSned that Ill the revenue Iaas If
the Unit@d Stairs must he repealed. or.
that they are no longer members OF rhe
Union .
In the next place, In tho same Prerla-
m ai1oH. We are distinctly advised uF his
regatd for State Rilshts.
whsn natelashi#g wRh the CONSTITUTION.
ils proceeds @
No one. fellow w-eitiENns, has a higher.
rpverr nee for the reserved rights Of the
Ststrs, than tha Magistrate who now ad.
dresses yea, No ane would make greater
sacrifices or nffeihi exsr,ians to defend
thrm from sinlatiae; hat eomai care Enast
ne taken " rravrFt on their part an i'm
proper iaserferenee With, OF resumption
IT, the Eafh's thev hare Testej In the ma
sion. The line has nnt been so diatinetiy
drawn as ta avoid doubts. In some cases,
~ the exercise nf power. Men Of tbr
best Intentions and sesndest views, rnRv
1iffer in their construction Of some parts
Of th" CONSTITUTE ns hut th+rp are others
on whirh iispassiunase reflection can leave
no Doubt"
In has next Inaugural Address after the
Proclamation be SAYS:
tsnaepiy impressed " ilh the allegations
Of that ~ igTBn pssh | am nQw about to
,ake, @hni! continue to exert all nav fa,-
ulties to rnsiatain the jast roRerAof the
Constitution, and ta trpnsmit unim mpnired
10 rostsri7v, the blas~iars IT our Federal
MON. Az the sane time il Ril; he NV
aim 20 ihcuicate hv Iny efieial acts the
Heeessily Of exercising, .hy the GvneraI
three powers only which are
alearlE delegated.n
In his sixth annual message, Dee mber
2, 1884 prsshisnt Jack ksen sars. ~
"The claims Of power for the General
Govern u9eRt upea eseb-of th~se points,
preseut fnsttnr Of The deepest
interest. Tbat ihe moe, igiurious
sosisieis wouhl ma rpis'a biz ar iseS kssaxren
The respective jurisdictions Of The Ststr.
and General Gossrnm n,s, in she absence
of constitutional pFoSision narktng out
their rfspretiye boundaries, cannot be
doubted. The Hocai advantages 20 be OBJ.
'sir ed whHli iutprh the States tp hvef
Ioak IN the brginsing the dangers and DIFF
icultiss to which they might be Ultimate
" exposed. Tbs pnw ers pxerrised hY the
Federal Government would SOON he re
garded with iesloasy by tbe State auther.
iriea, And originating ~ theT nnss. from
implication TT assamptlnn. Il wonld he
imppsslbie 10 afix 30 thea certain snd
asfe limEts. Opportunities anil tempta
giors TO the assumption of newer iHeom.
patitl With Stsaf SewsTeignty. would be
and tho-e barriers which resist
the tendency of our system towargls c, n
s0lidaf iDn, gseasiv xeakemea Tire CO
GERS and agents of fbe General Govern.
msns mighf nss alwsvs have the diacre-
ton 10 abstain from ipt~vmpddling with
State esneerns; and il shsy aid, they wo'a
uns always escape the suspicion OF having
dime So Collisfo@s aad consequent srrir
tstisns soulJ spring ep; thai barmeny
" AIeh psspusd exiss heaween fises fsemeral
sassxsgsS ne aasl essh Easm b~so of the Oar.
federacy wnald bsfTequently intercepted;
ard spirit Of sonisnaion would be sn
gen6arsa, aad fAs danger pf divisioa
greatly malaiplisd.a
In kissssenth aanual messaxs Of De-
u sskssr 4 1895, pfe<idsra gseka0a s3es-
canss largely on the dangers Of Excessive
pcweF, and wsih that maxuanimity ana
a. a