The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1865-12-01
Proceedings of the Circuit Court for Har-
ford County.
NOVEMBER TERN.

Caleb S. Maltby VS.. w. N. R. Hail.
Judgment by consent. Ii. W. Archer for
plaintiff, A. III. Jarrett for defendant.
John A. Cunningham VS.. VIM. G.
Burk. Judgment by default. A. H.
jarrett for plaintiff, no appearance for de-
PENDANT.
b. f. Minnick VS.. W. H. Wright and
others. Judgment by consent Wha-
land for plaintiff, II. W. Archer for de-
PENDANT.
Dowell and Cochran VS.. i. w. Gallup.
judgment by default. Gilbert for plain
tiff, no appearance for defendant.
Rinehart's executor vs.. Joseph Gorrell.
Judgment by consent. A. II. Jarrett for
plaintff, II. W. Archer for defendant
Davis and Puc vs.. Same. Judgment
by consent. A. II. Jarrett for plaintiff,
Ii. w. Archer for defendant
George Walker VS. Samuel r. Wallis
and wife. Action on open account; tried
by d Jury; verdict for defeudant-Bate-
man for plaintiff, Ii. w. Archer for de-
PENDANT.
Stephen S. Johns VS.. Tue County
Commissioners. Appealsfrou the decision
of the County Commissioners, as to DANA
ges done by running a public road
through the lands of johns; Judgment
by consent for Johns for $250-H W.
Archer for appellant, Farnandis and Gal
loway for appellees.
Samuel Love VS.. The County Commits
sioncrs. Appeal from the decision of the
County Commissioners, as to damages al.
lowed Love by them, on account of run
ming public road through his land tried
by Jury; verdict in favor of Love for
S7OO-H. w. Archer for appellant, Far
nandis, Galloway and S. Archer for appel
lees.
David ROBIN VS.. Simmons, Briscoe and
Hilles, garnishees of Robert II. Powell.
Appeal; judgment atfirmed-Bateman
for appellant, Farnandis for appelees.
William Ii. Ewing vs.. Simmons, Bris-
coe and Hilles, garnishees of Robert Fl.
Powell; appeals; Judgment affirmed
Bateman for appellant, Farnandis for ap-
pellees.
Joel Stahl VS.. Simmons, Brscoe and
Hilles, garnishees of Robert II. Powell
appeals; judgment afirmed-Batemau
for appellant, Farnandis for appellees.
William Myers vs.. Simmons, Briscoe
Il llilles, garnishees of Robert H. Powell.
Appeal; judgment afirmcd-Bateman
for appellant, Farnandis for appellee.
Merritt Haun VS.. Simmons, Briscoe
and HilIes, garnishees of Bobcrt H. Pow.
ELL Appeal; judgment affirmcd-Batc-
man for appellant, Farnandis for appellee.
State vs.. John McDermity. Indicted
for disposing of liquor on the day of cleo
ton; confessed to the plea of guilty
fined S5O-Galloway for State.
State VS.. Alexander Croul. Indicted
for an assault and battery plead guilty,
fined So and costs-Galloway for State.
State VS.. David jaeger, -Four indict-
ments for larceny; tried by Jury;
verdict guilty on each ndictment-Gal-
loway for the State, S. Archer for de-
fence.
State VS.. James Il. Seaman. Record
from Cecil; indicted for stealing $500
from Gillespie, at Chesapeake City, on the
5lst day of July last; tried by Jury /;
verdict not guilty-Galloway and Mayna-
der for the State, Evans and H.W. Arch.
er for defendant.
William Greenland VS.. George S. Cul.
lum. Action of SANDER; compromised
5. Archer, for plaintiff, Bateman and Gill
bert for defendant.
James Heron VS.. Harry D. Cough