New-York daily tribune., 1865-10-28

have tho record TO show that while Of th.
suits bought by Mr. Palmer ~@ pending M Joha Ilecter
the city Mr.. Gunther the Mayer; Mr brennan Controller
Mr. booio, City INSPECTORS Mr. Dsven. Corporation Coun.
owner OF ts o6Io..G. claims Mr. HsaSor. bin hroush,
beoro the court the whole ransse lou "a, u which the
obtained Pare restraining The different ps.e. froni
doing things and among Others the defendant John
r. Dovr.n. Copontion Counsel, Is eIloined from hor
ING the defendant Francis A. Palmer any other p.ain6
take judgment upon any otl further asgnnr
90 be Gons IN IN tie cleaning s the .s G, under any
employment warrant or authority Of tn said City Inspector
need you by reading more Of tie OF
Guy pert Of tho bill Of compain. eu 1t wall bs by
cy ocS.s In iespeett to cleaning tho streets At the time
Tered 60 va. ;a,d in gueton bat We have only now TO
restrained him con.cnins that Mr. Palmer should
Judgments upon 1ny claims assigned TO him accognt
chewing hs streets For eorssntps to thes- judemen he ia
ehared with oihca mseonduct ht.crc defense 10
iooeims Mas entirely proper 10 confess judgment and Ia
the ie,Aer 'uu 1t Was decided In the snpn Court by
Judge lngraha tha, the CITY had deicnlo to the suit
After the Issuing Of the injunction In this, case and on the
return Oft order show cause tho whole merits OF she
up before Judge ngnha special tenn aud wa.
9y discussed and ,er due consideration he decided that
these claims were all valid have his opinion hege and the
| conclusion Of It Is ~ follows;
;, = Is no, necessary however forms to 'y more this
ra,hei by the city tLs OF the money, gusrsn
sed by them consider this sufficient to enti,c the
m,I aud aee'c',to payment aud render the Corporation
ebe shercsor For the reasons before stated therefore
OF the opinion that those claim. valid AID should be- paid
| snd that the Injunction cannot DO sustained"
This decsio IN favor OF the validity Of tie claims held by
Mr. Palmer against the city, VISA pronounced before these
charges made aganst Mr. Develn. aud may b.. fairly
assumed that the person ho to the charges the
fact that tose cesnng claims had bsan pronounced
valid by the counts but a. the dessn hav. been
the charges should contsn no truth the that the
Supreme Cour, had approved the atio OF Mt Dovel OF
NO account That decision however viii De respected Ia th,
chamber and you will not undertake to review IT,
have now done with these charges and II do greatly
mistake the effect OF the evidence have produced IS man
ed that under no circumstances can these chsges be sus
tanned Not only they unsusan.d but they shown
to he absolutely wicked aud fase by conclusive evdeuoc
admitting OF NO question or controversy hase carefully Alb
stained from slups any evidence that 4 rot matter OF
record Incapable Of contradiction will be ids for the
pIcsccr lou TO say that they desire give proof No amount
Of proof blot out the record hsvs shown and on that
record be destroyed there 10 Of evidence which
would induce attempt TO tho Corposon Coun
sol from bis oos You havs decided as would not e1
cept upos thA osAIss evidenes Of oSaca delinquency t
psdbls that tAs VI Mt pevsn ever 30 brought