, 1865-06-13

hls1rial in this Diocese, for certain alleged of.
ftnse, you proceeded, before hearing whether IT
- us q
Csn: Title ~ the case could moi cone !nto your
h1ndt-5ou proceeded to punish Dr. c. for that
Until lie ecclesiastical authority Of this Diocese
had omitted Tor three Inontha from the date OF re-
ceiviug your Complaints, to institute proceedings,
H. a.ter nsa eaanss IT, G. has bee
sga,nst In Two Dioceses. a. well as under txo op-
posste and ineomps.:b'S h1sactet. tn thls atyo1r
,De. He has been st the tane tine rnder @ sen sen,
tsase = se,h.Aerk, a4nsoaizhed--kher<, ptonta.
s e H9 & 5 SSs Be
j " 81 e?Ss' pre-
prohibition. ne consinasd 10 otaeiats, 5oa wroie @
a an Sc s ts9 xaE ~ ssaz nj e q. aoss
r. psper sheala 3 % sen4aSisa.sa sSasst sDs' Z
if v,s. T1ne nc section, under which you
tatred Tue prohib.tfon, required 10 notice. Bnt
eupposlng The section to hare applied (as we have
co1dipg 10 we'll fnown aud universally adopted
laws y natural Justice. to noticc, directly and
formally addressed 70 hiu,self, On The sssuod that
Or iii opportan,t! has been given hin Of being
heard In self defsnse., 1t would be manIfestly
coltraty to al principles Of Justice to put man
% - ~ H. nuAtfeS t .r,nh 'as =. ~. . uEsh aae @
~i'hon! trial on such chnssca. That Dr.. c. may
oe supposed 70 nars M KnoEn t n wnns neut yaa re,
osa nnt r,iJcE.s ta c..a n nv view II. .ct
Was uulaw:ul because without notice.
bayt vt; isu: , e1,o;saEoted a. plainly IS eoqla,
you The grounds on whica contend that the pro.
hihitton ]n question Tas uDlawfal!y imposed and
nI aou suh @ 81 me 1noe1ai pro-
It dus 5E 81 o e. to I sena lin Il Copy
II rem,in. RIeht Rey. and dear str.
| aYour fliend ind S1o,her.
! .-. t'CuAs r. McILvAIEE,
Bishop Ut the Prot. Ep. Church in Ohio.''
s:-ln one OF Jour letters to Bishop Bedcll,
ctlleats In ibis docese. As M The clsrfyman 70
l:nen Ut a3 We -, teai9eas o. Ualo. = VIII ocens 10
S ~ , ss cais q one
anaer ~ which arplicj oaly to aon:rt,idtai.
Ia question he'd been residing long atter tGo piT
months allowed, ssith9nt being transferred to this
diocese. ! rot ned him OF u, and re-
aEd has not been usnEierrtai 10 thls dsy, though
| etlll reeiling in Ohio. Having long since seen
6aye become ~ nsni!s.i,I wsai no Iasihar .han
nearest 10 hi1s, haiti Was ine1pedisnt to 1nTite
him to oflclate. and that wished they would NOT.
10 ZONE t1stanees tbosa clareyn.en, understanding
re as moi grohisstinG, considered themselves ht
aa IA nxerene ~ kin Tsssine, .nv.1a, n r.
dii aiinw him n of3ctate At snn,a serr;re. Thcrs
soon became well ratieded.of It's jns1pedicney a1d
ceased 70 do 80. Tbs caee has nevsr gone further,
ihoueh 1t is TeU l'kely the venerable brother re-
1e5rtd 20 tuppcsea be hss been formally prohibit
! sd, and has 20 20 represented his posiuon. Hso. It
~ h;ys Gas ~ @ IN IN
stoo3, 1f:rcpretented. aud some. Ieceiyinr lii
rni.rerrrecntatsona, haro mls1ndelstooa ny
eo9!ee With regard to HIM, c.P, NJ,
4fahr SsAI kJ$
letter. pr. ctacraft lad received from Bishop
MtlI'nine =, nia tItaeT Mmissor5 ana 1oIWasdea m
!. 10 0!snop y r'1a Mhnksnouse' 1he Letter d.
| ] ma,Sa "ns ~ ,n .s,.,,
I9 ine Eccles'asnea4 AaAos1ty oi me DIOCESE OF
ns !ttnois: .,fr .. n. u en
rhe s. ;,sn;tea e 9e % r. Ss;,rs i : s ilan.:
sfasndsg IN h' hnd 80 t,s ~
INV ~ .i " auk, tss LIZ seats last
ii.,'n y! rjnnsnass nr X. IL ef1ol In
urasr suca tsrnas msy be esabraeea he e charess M
iei T!ss 10 ", ,sseahy pisssatsd iof illsi i
sua S be b
sentence Of ofa6tnonition, he IL now pursea md de-
A''~' CHAs. p Mc1,v,ry,
b.. Of 3. Of 1J1io,
Hsfon Whftehonse II @ se ali III nj not scknor,ecc IN
Dr Ererratf he rscefn, ~ tha T attss H}snss ~
IT. ~: etaSt ,'t W h ,hs q tne Layer un.s
Inc letter Of tie latter. be:rine - date lat siasch
o,h. The following extraordinary eomm9nIca,
~. a. "a nir1;.sn.v nnd r.tns-,s - -. Gisor ~
m.riSa,aa IT, DAu0Soe5' alo IL W oisoop
Hae; It IS p1ope, to state here that AZ thu rr-
Quest Of Dr, Clacraft, cop!es ali the paucrs
laid before Tie Standing Committee Of the
Ulocese " 0nto, showing %hat complaints
we're made against INN by Bishop Nhitehousa,
rs IN act Of simple justice.
..cu,.,. .,,., ,,,-
II III, RI r., p Mea11s,ss n.etoo' Apnl 10 1855
DEAhSm: Incknouleaes the recelnt ofa ron1
OF tbe repurt mado to Jon 81 ia Standing coz. COZ
Of y ihs Sss's q oho ot IN
I have aleo received a Letter ron ynu d.t.d
in New roti Were haye been from :! the at Ia s ~
| Of last mpnln to the ZANE dste IN the present
On my .rtturn on Saturday Inst to the city,
| whether Tonr Letter DiMiesory In behalf Of The
Re3.J. y; crserait bad been accepted ey me.
a. ,hst s Letter. D!:.o;y I'D 5ses
Dtnl.sory yi rom % you, Ia datsd IS. r. iss Ne"esS
bec 10 tay: 'e'@@ e'14D4411s"''o1s
fh.t rep1et to be compelled tn eons,der tba
! r,uceediugs III the cass Of me Htsniin~ EonnIt
md onss, q md ., ths So
lion whether the caEon iii tit IL has been pTop-
| er,y cfmn1ted 5Fiti1 ~ ~'N ~'~ fSf
! ieepssaer tbe Rey, p., Cracss,, a. st,u ,nh,b,,.
cd nom officiating in the npcese Of Illinois AZ
am ct satisfied Of the fl,ccpce OF eaid clere7.
/ msp, or that he has been sconittei m irta1
| specttully return herewith Your Letter nj
J niieory IL favor of the Rev, J, ~, Cracl,aft and
| juoEnsnt seriously qusliaed a. to lis standlns
and Character. Yery tfujy,
HrsnTj. Wu17ruor,,r..
~ w. .,r,o,,. 1a.t". - p,.1a., WI,
~ l4e tolese!uS lsttcr u nlsaoI, N9ile-
! mouse, BlaAop AcIlv2lne made reply aa fol~
lows: c,x.- .,.. ,oex
! To the nt. Rev. II. J: Whitehouse, y. D., B!shop
q the Diocese o. luthols;
Dear s1F-l hsve received your commnnieation