The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1865-05-24
tcerf,nvef RON tAs first page.

be international Union for peunison 10 strike, bu,
bey consde 81 ine' pedent 10 grant such pefmi.-
200. - ,h. lr9n N"lider uion was not IN eondi.
ton W ALLOW Of af.Iike at pretent He beey ed that
vhie comb .ion eIistsd the would not 10
educ'd ne con'ide,ed that The reduction IN the
no 'toterImont but through is nuntie. Who pressed
,Pon beln beesuse II -as ,uppo,ed that tho Nsvy
.n the only Savv yard in the Tinted
'.'e, vhich h,d succeeded in reducing -.fe',
,ad ,hi, -s in CONSEQUENCE Of non-comtination,;
Win regard 70 newspapers, he severely ceu,ursf
,orfinsInen ior not uppofting paper, which we're IN
ftaDgs REyIyw, u Philsdel phinJ vas sadly in want
u support. lie had himself asked new, vendors 70
heR could n S%' be- s1. .od Eat he 9sSaef dd
~snt them; They could no, eel 'heln, gu, su,h
svdity In conclusion he strongly urged on all the
trades the necessity Of education aud o9'ed b point
ms OUT the benefits derived BY the Brooklyn Caren-
ten' Union, uhich insisted on % 50 per dag for
sAges monteI then complained that he was not
properly notified VI the meeting. The President an
sacred that il va' published IN the stS member
said that sdesmsn lid not read the suS. MI Can p
to- s,id that VT all nonsense. The SuS 'shone Tor
all md -~ An honest square paper The
$50 hsd .lsAy, ,tood by me WORKING or ,n
rrr, he would state hat HE prime pal had directed
he papor 10 be- adyer.ed In the sus only g. the et
toni o one column daily and this showed him that
she rus read by ali cln,,e. IL ~W all uon,eure
,or rentomen to 'ay otherwise m,mhet cad pc
sdvort.ornenu Another gentleman said IL v~ the
guy nt every 'fadesinan TO read the uhd" notices
Nd thy we're alNays In the most con,picuou' r.
umn, Of the srS. The former member adm tha'
h. -m vione, aud promised 10 read no giNet,ss-
.rn,s 10 itu.' . huinu.i q" sd,,s,c. ,,,rr
shich the meeting ADJOURNED. Inc rie,deui 81 w,
International MON vas "'wticl 10 W p',sohI p.t
sent an apology. Ills absence disappointed great
puuibef.
CORPORATION OHptSASCr. - Scventv-f.e
rollnis collected M tnri 1t the fr't bitiiict
Court yoststGa.. lot violation OF tofpoiaiion ORA.
aaao,, tiye wo.e .hacImgn, who wete tired rlO
"a h iot Dr. vine a. ~ ~ Ni'ho.t amp LIZ .1.h
lie wsi hnco 40.
CATHOLIC RrroRMAToRY.-The Conyen
ion OF li.h soc cite. mo- sgaiu lsst o'cninr Pat
ck MeAtic grc-ii ~ pnd finally ~ e9d pl9n g.
ormaiorJ. Tho Committee will report on Friday
UCninr.
TN BOARD or EXCISE met yesterday and
ioi vac received iiom tho Internal Revenue once
WhSf'on in sp 10 in1niS, ,s5 mad, d NE NE
bOnd," must have hNe-cent stamp AIMED
TIE COURTS.
CorHr CsLrSpAR rms pAY.--supTene Court
'rrur 40 lea ctuseB ADDED to-day Part 2--Nos,
-, lois, 1850, SO 20 -, 49,! ia l45A Is 9,
80 l4i, 464, 1852, i.Ii, 1872, 1912, lt6i, llI6,
vi.
rnf IlAnry LA1AErs Mammalian Mcdonald
t"srrdiy Pleaded guilty In the Court Of General scs
dons 10 hc.ns All accessory 10 Beru.d friery after
h" rusics o. llarry Lazarus The Court allowed
he accused 10 30 Gu his bail for sentence till later
Ia in the tern.
CrIlors DtyoEcE CAsr.-In the Supreme Court,
.eseriAy, before judge Wells, the case Of Mary r.
rrusi, ATT Joseph W. Trust isaid T. be Doctor T.
feli1 Goitul, the Broadway perfume }, came on for
rial Thi',uit presents some peculiar features the
defendant scttinr up In defence that the plaintiff 10
jot HE wife, although he admits having cohsbited
aih her, and the plaintiff chareins him, In addition
N the charge Of adultery, with sros msltrsatment Of
'er aud Of her children The following 10 . summary
VI the evidence
John Simpson tes'ifei-tnev the plaintiff and
te'endant hccNn" acquainted NTH them IN 1877
I'D cnained there xix months afterwards: plalntiff
N4s living ihe!eS a~ne there weIe thee or Jour
ohlldren In he holte belonging 10 Mr.. Trust,
ctoss-e1amined HID never heard MI Trust call
MTs Trust his wife, and he never suproeed che vac
his family 70 ths house II he had not believed they
we're marnet In answei TO a question from tho
Court Titne.s ssid defendant usually Addressed
o. p B,ad' terrified that he fret became acquaint-
Afterwards tLey boarded with wines. at No. G4s
boadway, ani weie known NJ Mr.. and Mrs. Trust.
hey lived there about cir months, and were tecog-
nized as naE Az ~iie, and occupied tie came apart
" W. Dian tes'ifed-Am an utscho Of the Rcsi..
tei's office and beeAme acquainted With these parties
IN 1876 the following year witness boarded with
them and they Nele known % Mr. and ME- Trist.
Wiie.
0ro,'-eyamined. Have heard that NJ Trust had
wife in England. Never heard Mrs. 1ruit called
Madame Damp or.
JON. hct ulin tesitfed-Haye known defendant
tluce Y6 became acquainted with plaintiff IA 1916,
plaintiff vas then keeping house with defendant:
they lived toeetser M man and wife, Witness had
brsrd defendant adde's plaintiff As Mrs. Trust.
or-eNanlined.-Never heard Trust cay he had =
vie IN England hut had understood thai he had a
wife PRIOR to hi maj rinGe with plaintiff and that she
bad abandoned hun ioI pay-actor. Neye- heard tie
ChIisisi name tt Defendants nTst wlie, but he un-
doIs,ood che vi. ballet dancer at one OF the the
auos.
Dr. Scho,nmakrr testified that he resides at Flush.
ing, l. L.; kroH thu paut, IN this action, have done
dentistry business fol Mrs Trust and dc endnnt paid
the bills, and the parties lived together msu and
wife.
1874 was called IN by Mr.. Trust 10 attend MIS- Trust
ma vn rcianei ~ their family PHI .ican; that year
nchild .ss born, and Mr. Trust recognized 1t ~ his
child; Nj llu't Always rpoke OF Mr.. Trust az hi.
wife.
Constance r. Trust testified that she was dnurh
ter OF plaintiff aud defendant the fret separation &C.
Cutr,d IA ls5J OF 1851 and they AteTw ards came to-
grther, and a. ain Cplrard M 1855; .nes. a, tan
(ears old when tho inst separation occurred; her
father Alwayt called her mother hs wife, and 40 such
had uequeutiy Introduced hei che assumed the
name Vt DaLipicr after she dismissed from tho
lomlt, who. she had lCCn locked w Tor q considor-
alIo pcriod IN the ear 1855
iudifdS Irts. ,o,liei- Am son Of the pait "a.
NJ lalher aud mother had MwaJs add 'ersed each
o'hrr AS man and VIE they repaIated in 1850
.U'' .Aaln d'UIhd ~ at mpt to strite his
.het bad ioiieted All CLAIMS TO ho Iespecled A. a
inlr b, NJ chA zen, on accuuut " tie cuu, ~ he
hhd piitltd lOSltds his mother uLd h. chtId, en-
Mhnc,s ,outmNe.ed too rsli tho 10 alton oIistinY
htl,, zen ".",seh and the defendant to otter any
Re-diiec'. tonduct OF defendant towards plaintiff
was eAttudiu. a. tturl.
hdI'I iemr','' 'c,uhct.-I reside in Houston
nm,Ls 'rt Id Niuth A,enur 1 kpo 40 euJsn;,.
he II ~, ,fnsi. h-Ne knuNn h.n about hye IenI,,
Ter veil, and shpvtI Az O. er MY i,i $500 '1
countenancel iie has We ted me 9 ,ht or n.ne
tlntG SON "hel, ound 'hofo 10 Vsi,, me nos.
Y Do you Cali yourself Mrs, Tmitf A. l decline