New-York daily tribune., 1865-11-30

this city to Richmond have seen some Of the English
newspapers OF the lh of October denying the
of The settlement sent you concerning dispatch from
Mr.. Seward to the United States Minister at France
on Mexican aif,iIs. / do not know what was the
"ofcia authority" upon which my letter was contra
dcred, but do know that the authority had tor the
Information sent TO yOn far higher than any which
con d be obtan-d IN England at that date
Indeed 1t WAS not probable that any one in London
could have beard Of the di patch tn which referred
since II was only sent 10 Froi few weeks immed"ty
preceding my letter. without however, discussing
there contradictions, s my duty 10 inform you that
news sent on the 4h Of October substantially
true p,oiess"d on tn give tie "tende,c," of the
dispatch but am possession OF further parilcu
lars IN the subject and l give them You correct
to the ,eiy letter. Time VIII show whether NY news
from Washington or that which is obtained IN London
IL most worthy Of elef.
will now give you further detos about the dis
peich and. whether these details are believed n En-
gland or not. they rre true MI the ssme /. at
drrssed to Mr. BigeiOw. at PaIis. some lime In SEP
tenher Inst. IL directed him to bring to the notice o
NJ. Drouyn de Lhuys the tact that the United States
Government had been informed that additional Nubisn
troops were about Ia he sent 10 Mexico by France.
Ii set firth that when the first fprc~ dispatched
from Egypt the Government did not interfere because
II engaged in settling lis own domestic differences
that as the Emperor was aware, II had nov abolished
>lnvfry In lis own county, and conld not but look
with dl-fayor upon an attempt made by n foreign
Pow 10 Introduce into any part If this con
tinent against their will The United States Goy'rr
ment bod been Informed that tho Pashas negroes wee
cnriioD ard were even lorciby thrust ON board the
tliJs WI ich were to carry them 10 this country.
The French Government was warned that Congress
had pea,edly and decidedly affirmed thrt the Monroe
doclnre must be mainte'ned, and the Executive and
the p,Op.c looked with yrry serious concern upon
past aud present movements II France In Mexico
Ibis lay not he the precise language Of the dispatch
but ii s faithfully its tenor and import. The dispatch
sent not onl, Ia FRANCE. but 10 the United States
Mi isiers rt Alexandra and Constaniiuople.
must inri er stntc-apd state IL Oh the very best
authortythnt tie views II the United States Govern
mrnt on the subject are these; 1t holds that neither
monarchica nor m imperial form Of government will
b. tolerated by the people this continent. be-
II would be- opposed to the whole spirit OF then
political system. Ii consiaers that tie En- perur took
az unfair advantage Of the American Government in
placing NnIlniian on the Mexican throne at u time
when its hands were tied
IL believes that neither the French nor the English
nation would approve deberaie attempt 10 re INTRO
Sateiy III America and II regards the con pnsy
service Of negfo troops In Mexico form OF Slavery
IL does not wish 10 go to with France hut II does
wish Ia pro'ect and defend those p'irn principles
which The American people most attached to bese
the opinions Of the Government Iisnybody knows
them better Than the Government itself then reject the
foregoing statement