New-York daily tribune., 1865-10-28

your p,.ona ,pr.a rom t deliberate ymsnt Of the
s"Ireme Court Nevstbesee, you should ,nna yy Sor
duty 20 ti,s who each justify in doue.
h, suount involved srdh the ms'tsf .e' - Uni nb,i rc
,er'ai Ct tn; JnasiHe"'' Joas u DryELs'
.nrro.. & win no, BE- claimed that Mr Dey.hn eoua ,
have brou ght appeal to ne vooI, m h. lad the
Sh,sd n irb 10 bis own cause upou MS owl
bty snd upon The best advice h' coau o. y, The
m,ps.,r Of the supr Court The ehsgs against s'i ~
i'm that ho omitted 70 appeal ron ' .hoyd be- r~moy@d
from orce more ubfound,d more sbsuid OF go moe
charge wss neyt essn seg sha. bos y a yappss fos Mr.
Brennsn gsin. bis conseuii II idle to contend lgr mo
ment that h could Bui suppose that onyoody snomd
ss. whs. Il i should be conceded tia, Juss
Alien Mr. EyOrs and Ar Deyein .. we " .hs mnIo % IN
prem, Cc ur in Firrt Judicial District were m'a.sn
teir view Of the aw' Is 1t crime to err IN j0ssnen''
co. then oil srrcrnInas. . :, ,,, o,,,.
70 snythirg more tLn Of jud,nsr was com
nitted bringing the appeal In 'hi. error u "
hs sapros. % .,g. saa be1sn that Ii. acos
nuenoed BY any Improper motive OF That ne or tis .
rusrns and protecting ID. best Interests OF tho tsIyss o
the city M. chssetes q the ehSI:e snd IN. tbs
belief 70 made for any honest purpose and VIC
matter to your Lsssency in th, o m to .now ,h1 20 ~
AZ this evidence rcmsls of record be obntereo
It 1, utterly impossible for the prosecution to produce .y
stat. proof that woud induce you to interfere WIN ths
duties end have night TO demand on bic behalf th~ he'e
charges shall BE- dismissed. .
dnsr In ooe OF his ofeiai duty and contains
three heson Tho first and second relate to the sans
Srsesaton Fir.,-n th th., in thirty five 'dt' com
oeheed y ddeIen, P,re. in hs sSpee S 1Sf ~
for work alleged pretended 10 have been doe on ts puo
road. nd b-cO,ns due in December 1882 the 'd Goanis
ray. cns OF service OF the complaint l
IN few days thereafter the said Coune put 10 sns~e 70
esob Of said sui.. which the plaintiffs "y,rIy
gfrnn
and thereon stood reerycd Tor several mons hN
AT. rwsrd and the month Of Juy the said Coun w.hoas
any cion Of the evidence OF th" correct
urs OF the Claims consented that the piuiih IN each Of tho
said re.pce i've suits should enter jndtrs ior certain
amount Of damages being shout @ ~ aud the costs
ib,r-in amounting % siSS 10 for which Judgment. ~ss
Sy<fcoion seond-In th. this, forty nine other es,.'
similar stated IN ihe lnst specification ~es bad,
tered .s.i.t the .sid Ms,cr Ac., tie M day Of Juy
sIe7 e. .nd tho costs amounting TO about s32J Il.
be possible .his charge 1; more nisuiou, and rn'sunsod
Ta1G~6e Ssni" the third charge, and he further denies
eh aud every allegation OF fact contained In the secihoaiion
hereunder except hereinafter stated lie sdn'1. 'be
Of tbe .con. -u,onsd in the hr-, cod ec
ord steche Of the ihiTd chmg lie sdni bs saSd
were FOR work labor, and scvocs rendered and er
material. fln.bed In tbe repair OF tho pubic rod. lie
Jolu pouoyln which action he caused Al a'"rf 10 b,
day iacpc-rd ..tns .ach d'ct.c. he As sdvi.ed
dore and he bepirtGent by which the Chains. Io~c
b. 3D. could b. nde 10 'Ad action 'nd nat the .,ms
scon. neniion.S IN said tr., ard second .rcohe'on
w." pp0n ,s,,, we nIs,sus ,l'r.n ,.,siro'sd DE-
to the ond 0eisnsr contained ~ tad answers npon
the siount u' not iai- isct' 'ucie' 20 coun,e
dcn.. h, he iuns' Tot the pslnins in ssd seisn n'
e slsy sfof crmuuns Ia aid answcfs' s,t'cd note,
fssm'r' Of al ia.%erier m zach Q, Ia 's,'ons 'na
h 81 snoY.nS S.yor &C. eale io rsu
l,t tigc the frIr-i Al
tenn AID rEdef.d sustaining tAn d'norrf WIN
ro. ma ,b. auction IA each Of sAd ,cions bring den
uos sT-. sirn 10 the rorsra tern IN ihe eA~e Of
pone,s tho Mayor aud the Other sions st 10 abif
,s TIA, ,PPe ,ha, gyon sd spye' The fsn,ra
said d. With eo.;', that thsrenPon an peal
seusrsi,sim ,is, r.udins tho sgpsl the Court Il Az
ss Lr oeiVed Communication from the touIo''ef OF he
tny Il Sc~iort stating that io" action. Dad ben eonpf'
u.sd .A ~ au..ns Him OaoT as~ tie plant n IN eaeh
Of .a s,a. 70 t'ts judgment & 70, We % sg ,e. s na M
vee by section r. Of III. city hsrer amended in ie7
vrh pa~s settle and al ut al cnr, srnst tho city
.oc sarr. ~"r- made IN cemphanee with b. rqss'. aud
jrd.mr tore. Secoidngiy which Judgments ssfs az
pn,~i by OF the siicss u the Supr.ur Court
bed b. Lina TIE scor, Of The Donovsn eale ~ The
Cour II Appeals mi All the othrr by puab
the uii. an Of tbs chs.r hei Nh D.v.iu pvo-s
ouiss sp-a TO the Corr Of In the Donovan easc
.. .'n o s coSit bed dsrins hi, noah Il. sdsmel,
Of its ssIr.ms Court rvrrsd end all H. .s Claims
sEaiut the dec.rd iega ani ic l. char Il. before
you snd the p1be with hssas Ia way oonDiy-d with
somebody s, in 'he.e unjust aud roper I'd
thing the Of thi. fact proved by records
Ia pans sb-oue verify /. uee to sv the bsssle.s char
.ei.r u ih' chsre and 10 utility of allowing to DO any
iuIt let pro,ecg,sd
T.rr reur.l. any qu.son mad. be, h., The labor on
eroo.d npon ,oe p9b. rsd Of ,h' e unass the diree
uIs p,o,i'.on the -stue hch forbi. auy public IN
IA L ely Of hrw-fers from costscting 1sbt tor tho
p-r OF sbor without previous IL.
psynsnt la ,hese ,Lere sPpror E,on made
when the work dons and the yTinciTs dsSense rested
u that fact End that ,sson Of there power in
Of tue storf department nroreft al the
eipss.. o The city , defen;e S.' oyerrud BY all the
Cout Of Appeal Tn. ra..on whether e statute WA
distesy rohhitor The cOu. below .aiii. was dEcc
vi n.rrey I'D might BE- disIesarlsd but IN. Count APP
tn sid prohil t0ry md - thiA determination all The
judgment. otined .siH'he City IN these c~es have bee
Of duty law ,c Of IL Corporaob has rroduc 4
hi. resu Ia rrraiSno before upon the ueoou eha
oftonnving wh taos eimsnf % punder the oy treasury
E.pud-nce aud maie, e,faiuly can no furthergp
Iwill show yoi 'R detail ba~ this tlns went The
fuis VIE oomnsn ~ and the uiweF pnt n hstng mp the
d,En-e ba,- sta't 20 all Of -jih d.nurus n.e
posed An,r tho csn'es were AZ ue upon the demurrers
uotof en,es INTO IN tie Donovan cass between the
sair. attorney and Mr. Deven. the CORPORA
tou IN III. following wods 1T is heray stpuriod aud
Agreed between tho sorney. iot the re'peeve parties I
Ne decision ihs demurrer IL the above saised action sa
hercnaf': mentioned be sans s said CAUSES had
argued heio til, court ard decision ende-d s. eaeh
eau'e Aud S'o pu.ta and sst,a Snn hke orer ~
ID. dseson. Of the court sh be entered IN each
Ia Special Term costs IN EACH" And then follows tie
list. OF shout ore hundred aud fifty csus.A
Nr Drvciu argued tine b broytn ~ the Special Term
and tie psin mad iuen at on The drlsuer Grd appel
u the BsHcH Term the ucn at was iEined and judgments
entered agauT Tie ey. IN appeal taken 0y Mr.
D.yelu TO lie Court Of lpp~ai' nnl while tic ws
pending esTmir IN tat CuuTt hse charges pre-
i-rrrd ho thai the Go o u Apes, has reversed al thee
Judgments the nstauc u The Counsel 10 he Corporation
ought ~ reg rded concun evidence that IN tcspec
10 these a least h. has Degl.ctsI public dNy.
On the an of April. 1854 Mr. Ds,c.n writes 90 the Con
tIoler as faiovs:
CIR, oY NEwYoEr Law nrP.Nrxrxt
OIUCE 0a CoussEL 10 rHE toniJgATOs. Apiu 49, 1864
Hon. MAJ pHEw 4. RhyssAS. C0gpo.iey.
SR ib.g TO cal slteDtios to the summons and com
TlFins nine u shich lncss