The Baltimore County union. [volume] (Towsontown, Md.) 1865-1909, 1865-05-27
Circuit Court for Baltimore County.
MAY TERN, 1865.

Before Hon. D. G. II. Emory; John T. Ensor,
Esq., States attorney.
nts'e.. b5 s9j. FRIDAY, May 10TH
John Charles, indicted in two indictments,
one for assault with intent to kill, the other for
common assault. Pleaded guilty of common
assault in both. Fined So in each case and
costs, amounting to $l2O.3S. Removed case
from Baltimore city. 1,esS ~ .,
On motion Of John t. Ensor, Esq, d. H. En-
ory, ESQ of the Baltimore Bar, was admitted
to practice at the Bar of this Court. *,
The remainder of the day was occupied with
the case of Henry Marshall and VIM. H. Mar
shall Us. VIM. Slater. Before reported.
49, SATURDAY, May 20th.
= Sitting In Equity-James W. Offut vs. At
wood Blunt, Amanda F. Blunt his wife, and
Others A bill filed claiming a certain interest
in the land left to Amanda Bluntand S. Offut,
deceased, as heirs at law of S. Offut, Sr., also
deceased, and praying for a petition for the
same The reading of the evidence and the
argument of counsel in this case occupied the
attention of the court all day. ~
49, MONDAY, May 22d.
The Magistrates appeal docket, numbering
forty five cases, was taken up this morning, and
the following cases disposed of:
| Caughman VS., Schawrrnan. Appeal dismiss
| ed. Continued Wroten VS.. Hartman; Collins
VS.. Pryor and Williamson; Pocock VS.. Rogers /;
Perkins vs. Knowlton, two cases; Knowlton VS..
| lock Merceron VS.. Merceron; s. F. Norris and
others VS.. Bennett; Moallvs. Chatterton 8
Hooker VS.. Morrison Chatterton and Simms
vs. Chatterton; HollingsbaSgh VS.. Price, (sev-
eral cases y McClelland VS. Pyfer; Hooker VS..
Morrison Colwell- VS.. Kuhl; Gruetee VS.. kim
nell Ban vs. Hampshire; Worthington VS..
Gent, two cases; Hare VS.. Morrison; Hurst VS..
CARING; Dumfer VS.. Bishop; Gatel vs. Hinsin-
guler ;ssane vs. Weigand; Risto and wife VS..
Cole same VS.. Burgan; same VS.. Mortin 3
Riggs VS.. Pyfer Sutton VS.. Randell; Fitzim-
mons vs. Cudd and Emrine; Cullion VS.. Small !;
Palmer VS.. Raymond & Burton; VIM. Hall vs..
Meredith s Ford and q arrettsylle Turnpike Co.
Appeal dismissed ~
State VS.. Henry Frank, indicted for selling
| liquor on Sunday; and selling without license,
| plead guilty of the first charge, the last charge
was stetted by the States Attorney. Fined $40
and costs. ~ ~ t fy0tfr
Joseph Storm, VIM B. Hooker, BENZ. Craft
and Henry Cook, indicted for, the larceny of a
sum of money, the property of Noah Worthing-
TUESDAY, May 23rd
State VS.. Silas W Conn, indicted for an as
saulton George R. Stone; plea Of guilty confess
ed by accused, when several witnesses were ex-
amined as to the nature of the assault. Fined
SIS and costs.
On motionof w. H. II. Anderson, ESQ.,, NJ. A.
Mullin, Esq, of the Baltimore bar, was admit
ted topractice at the bar of this court
August Beck, indicted in three cases for sell
ling lager beer on Sunday, gave bail in $500
5000 in each case, with Christian Gilleman as
security.
State VS.. Simon WEIGH, a Justice gof the
Peace for Baltimore city, (removed case,) in
dicted for malfeasance in Office. Tried before
court. Adjudged guilty fined 500 and costs.
| State VS.. Simon WEIGH, Thomas Cooper, and
Alexander Barnes, also q removed case from
the city, indicted for an assault on and false
| imprisonment of Henry Achs. Tried before
court; held SUB caria. ef,F..;
Antoine Hermann, indicted for an assault,
gave bail with Conrad Fustenhafer in the sum
of 5000.
State VS. John Smith, colored, indicted for the
larceny of Three bushels of grain, the proper
ty of VIM Brooks. Tried before the court /;
adjudged guilty. a Not sentenced.
State VS.. Emanuel Irons indicted for selling
| lager beer on Sunday. Tried before court; adj
judged not guilty. - ~
GI9l WEDNESDAY, May oath.
Simesa Welsh, Thomas, Cooper and Alexan7
der Barnes, indicted for an assault on and false
imprisonment of Henry Achis, whose cases
were tried yesterday and held sab curia, were
adgudged guilty, this morning by the court,
and fined $50 each and costs.
Henry Marshall and VIM. H. Marshall VS.,
VIM. Slater, fbefore reported;) an action claim
ing $4,000 for masonry done on the Northern
boundary of Baltimore city, by plaintiffs for
defendant who was the contractor with the city