The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1865-07-22

D.. !. u
md ICED purchase stock in the company by the repre-
sonations Of Mann with regard to the value Of the land
represented as the property Of the company naa
cited his friends to purchase stock In the company on
the strength Of these representations ,,
The following document then put IN and tdcnSneo
by witness as In tho handwriting OF defendant-
Oyylcz NAsS's PATENT AccourRxxEsrs
No. 2lo BROADWAY, N Y, February ~, 1895.
GEsrIxsns-I have the honor TO state that the con-
for the land OF your company have been closed
preparation mado to forward your interests in the
psny Payments for the engines and further payment
PEELED to ask the Immediate payment Of your subscrp:
.tion. prompt compliance will greatly oblige me- and
enable mo to keep engagements made In your oenA
straton our secretary is authorized 10 receive money
for ms and rocopt FOR the same In my name. am,
@'n''e"'0"' '''' 's'' "'-''' d D. MANN, Trustee
Cross. examination resumed-The Washington Petro
went Sy was CHANGED 10 Tie United Service Petroleum
and Mining Company; cannot say that the prospectus or
che company had been submitted for formal approval,
but II il had, believed he would have known it.
O Would the statements rot forth In that prospectus,
In your opinion, induce an ordinary business man 70
Counsel objected. Witness, he contended could not
anything about the operations OF another mans
mind.
Question waived for the present
DIFFERENTIATION continued-Had been induced to
make efforts to get the contract for the accoutrement
becausc no believed tho improvements they embodied
were good reabe had been In the military service OF
the country and knew VIVA. would Do "s bs
company was first presented to him no belev?? the
statements therein; did not know that Mr. Field held
bscrsd that others represented stockholders had
not paid their subscriptions defendant told nm IN
inquiry on the point that the GRAFTON hoei
property had been decided 70 him.
AN AMUSING scENE-THE DEFENDANT THREATENS
TO LICK" BoIEs, OPPOSING COUNSEL.
Mr. Boes counsel for the prosecution, remarked that
which, as trustee, he had no legal right 70 do.
Mr.. stewart, counsel for defcndant-Yes, he had
Mr. Boics-He had not sir; the law Is plain upon this
point lie should have stated to the company that the
property SO forth was his own
Mr. Banks for tho prosocution-The law upon that
point cannot be doubted.
Mr. BoIcs-The defendant Manu. sold the hotel 10, to
eho company he claiming az his but not representing
Mr. Stewart intcrruptns-6h, that's Irrelevant and
has nothing 20 do with the at issue. .
Mr. BoIss warmly-He away from the hotel; "
was only mere shsnty He swcars here that he is only
.wsn'y 1--WE years Yd Look a; him HA ,Sa
You'll ViH nd He has child eight years. old and he
swenty nvc years old Look al him. tLaughter.)
Mr. stewart-Now, Mr.. Boes, don't
.ounsc In excited manner addressed Mr. Boies--sir
you telling los, SIR wonder 4 You doing So OF
ian do So under the protection OF the Court All
nay, SIR, 10 that can lick you. tExcitoment)
MR.. MANN MAN AT AN EARLY ACE.
Mr. Boes--I say he tMann) swears he IL but twenty
I've Old Mann Now "d lSSs ,sa h
.ived at puberty at an early age suppose you coudnt
oomoit Great laughterJ
Mr.. BoIEs "HARpISG" ON NANS's AGE.
Mr. Boics-1 repeat again that the witness has sworn
that he was only twenty five Now look at him Con
LIfled laughter This is an important fact:
Mr. Stewart--Mr. Boies, you know that this Is not
proper way proceed Let get regularly with the
pase .
Cross examination resuned-The prospectus OF the
company put into witness hands for Identification
out objection taken.
Mr. Stewart said he Intended 10 show that tho pros
oecus Of the company inviting the public TO SUP
scribe 10 IT, contained tho rcprcser atlons which
appear In the prospectus put forth by Colonel Mann
and In that he contcnded tho defendant had deceived
Tho public charged, tnen the vitne and tho
company ~ the present moment doing the SAME
Wing. He did not impu,s dishonesty V bs company.