, 1865-11-29

1
and lnllucntiai bua1ness men. In this city. II,
Wadsworth came to Chicago IN 1921, md cs.ab
aned nlmfelt n thc business OF selling dry good
gIneefes !ns; S2LMns, aaa PooS ana shoes als ats
J. WadswoEth- About the samc time there came
to s6is eiy 1To & gsnismen, stTse well Known
Ssnsa ma %ch oe nei se 9 1 RRJsr na John
Ing business similar to that OF the Messrs. Wads
a. d.. ~ H. ~ & taesv Two a!W5 nn1ted thc!s hasi
cbapin' Juj,u, WadsMorth ~ oue nf tso H. pyeF
eon;fnnsd n hsstna. n;,, r. ia Nm lhs nEn
chmin re,ired sni Wi,jo xheP PtaiSs Assts; n1e
The pmtne1abip, forming the nm Of Wafswnsth :. :;
] pEeIns Tha rr,r ffrnss t1d hnsins.. ;h. osns M :
and nen. the close Of that perfod %T cnnev3 ssI,
West from Massaehrzctts aud nurchssesI nerf Az =
Mr.. Wadswort's interest in the fln. it ,sas dusin
teeaule connected w1tn lt-Hsst al an arcnnntsn;
and tlen IS partner, and be continued IN paTtae,
slip With Tm. Waasworlh, until February, 1SGi
present slIt was based upon bin Of comn1aIu
nled By Elisha :. Mad.worth, charging ifaad o
,be Gelsudants 10 The ntanifess injury Of the com
Ing for decree, giving the complainant ahalr
ihe profits Of the several Grms With which Mes ~
Cooley Farwell have been connected since lie Is
Of February, 1Sds
The argument for the complainant by Hon Thos
AoyEe Wa 9asterlr cfort, and presented The as
f., strong hEht fos bis client. 1ie was followed b
avery ab,e and learned argument IN behalf OF ID,
as,sndanss' occupying nesr1y four hours. The FOL
!oMlnG Is q synopsis OF the leading points In hi
plea:
1le Understanding or The case Is difficult for th,
ons1ous feteon5: tnBt large portion OF the fact
Y the cass, The Conversations and agreements BE-
tWeen re partners are concealed, they being know
only 70 then1seites In legal controvtt-y all CHI
snnsstaness @ osartng upon the case should be open
~ ta3 eo ~ ID mathsmatles Tbs mathe
and obtaining its degree OF vayiat1ous describe md
saISn1te i,aas = he though It tarso millions aud
| Inevitable NptfA}nfV 1t
Is difficult, for the further reason that hsra Is srea
complication IN - different presuulptIons and the
troversy The human mind ID 70 ronsiuti ~ In H.,
Il czn deal With one or two fac,s resijy ana ai
physicans ten uE can attend to three dsncf ,hInHs
1T once. In this cnse however therr nre 1nsrT ~
feernt przsnmptiors Ey ennnsai has It1.,an, n,.
thtoryiu Ihe case, arising fom tbe comn1ic,tien "
lhe iaeta snd the nature and constltulon oi ,heis
this cze The most Of The chapea mr. imson,r1 ~
he m3sr or tbo conclusfons az imasnstvgi
ar only one OF two that are not .o.,,
fsad unoa the 2. dissolution
hn,b STps e nss rsptsssntaiop ,na Jan
is,ns,r n9,,Il.r la teaL nis account wss
same and sernna ~ va,ts g OF nc
natet ~ mace i9 tnc hooks running through
et - ~ t, ana LenainE 70 give Color ana sup
e69rs a.o tb5a Il cbaIe dne rslsi asked
fSaea ~ poy 10 sranteo upon proof or Gand.
fssaa ne charge there IL no escape from Il,
cnnratsd a ,S o. ans o. t1e iheoss rcad{
assume ia1t VIII he aea1n en1ndated on the same
sl8e, 1os y Mtaty attending bad case, that,
70 oa o e. Sso
'ais 70 sustain hem and they have no cage IN court
anen a.iempt 70 st up another theory which
case va found. ''''A
. IN, ~ 1us e GaalEe 2! itRnu, and "hat Is aft OF
11 Inc ~ h o. GonptHnt: satlshed that they cannot
d14frr
EEK 70 a7o,d u, but We shall hold them to l. That
snasEa ~ zen ma9e not only II the ha!i, but In
~ thr1 81 e .ne 2nnne "a oesn informed Of
a u h ene enu q tne Sate 70 LAG other the charge
t,nSes; ,btir IT, tnat my eaeos haye de-
la9ues tne coa1t sc SoRansf 2tlasge sum. osmonsy
has. toTo .3o ~ nnnateos ot thousands. We
alr 70 1eiena t1em rom that charge, not on
~ a9ni sha' a W. oa prane.ples o. morality
es nep to pvs pe ibn nof q isssn
th, nne h. haen ~ !eca nolnl OF view but
BE pet II Tbe necnnar 1,a mofat 10 o. elnia.
po,6inr at ieass noik,nr wnr,S 1' t ane csse
eorrt = Tcnt,',e ~ paaes sHr NOV no" oeiofe MS
Of fafr ahality In thc .t,-o saess ~ A y noi Man
Neli 4 Co., or. my osher is,se, IL ~ prominent pat
Ct nearly 60, to he pecuuIsrv snonnt Iaro1r =
thls case NJ snnt ihc NH 1,ne.. u h,S3asea r.. u
The expert who has e1amIaed lie boois IN fsm tss
in his exhibit and direct cToss Inteoatogis gp. 3ps3
!hs 1sepine Of re books md the styls adopted il
atter complained o. 10 einply one or il cres, ind
amounts to 6,eoo. lie tells us fnrther that lin.
ere:tis figured on the actual shortage Of capital on
dfe1epco @ only one u 3d. ADd s T.! vi, af se,s ~
tsr t. prove shat such interest pust BE- aaured Has
w. a} Of talent nST beore ths CONT been
and on that question The case must stand Or f,il'
eI 1es5 homer % w'l el1saay have remarked th1t The
profits. More money is Whist they are constantly
seetklne. , dheG theories change ehamelconlike,
uNoe e1!af HoM every ne" Object Presented; cun-
reM sssnre vaa ~ ;S~5 keep ne main ED In view
aTa[s sss ~, hs; sepEnI 10 defend enaes that
value Of Tie cbar.,e ia ihst Enoa. ~ = E. F@aHe nc
lesen1eG a. 70 Madswosth that he had lasgely over
ment oF ~ anns j &C. 'has procaEsd the
atjon. Ihourh s1nnn1fe hv ~ o coas t1e pssent.
entr.s M f,fsn e. " ~ sool ol Handnisnt
made, wy questions a asse was the
se sbs ,ha. he
trG. .1s a1 " pave not attempted to in
H. p.uo ~ ~. oat nave connned themselves to
.ne eensta ,s ea3rEe. II Is The eame confidence
E h.a ~. h.t, ssys n iosmer pat Of his
5Ion, lbas Of hi. .aking The Henderson assets."
y We ne9r o. vefdant countr5nen being defrandcd
nr psed 9aee nn nsEyE herd 9 i S
who looks on The 9liuering light, aimidns ia
ehlnlng beauty. and Knows not the danger viii pnt
iii is hss Nv nnfeT E o1 on . once and bum hmsef but
once cheated, As he pretends, By FarEeil. IL that
way, It s1pDo,abls case that he could again have
~ oem ca On q re same dodget Won1d not
SELF whether he was oyendIawn Or not!
NJ, Lester, the book.keepeF Of the arm.
tines Does exhibit A. presented b. Wais-
worth, az the statement OF his accouDtsnt. Jan 81
!ss2 @ ~ shox an ove,dratti No II shows credit oi
Ts~oS IL ri hsns s4s saa II DC s ds w. 70 ds
r hie n%'escy bss Entsa him ana wl not believe
attributes that perian 70 most me What a. Sese tSe
could hare been thc strength Of snch reptesena
tionel Would, or could 3f. Far,sell have tod lin
thn H. H., ssosnt e. mt w:s at
Ing largr creditl The euppoeitim ia tno
rid'culoqs for discussiop. Yet Ills Is the CHARGE
~ me nili and one Of the statements madc and
fslse: -
Inc asseet q eopafsnethip provided that e4ch
partners dfeW more than the sum named IN lie
pes % feao 'a II not containing the clause ap
What principle shall now be appliedi Only tvo
Ean f1 applied that Of equality and that Of inequa
Profits 6a .Ss1 fnat Se,q e sqnin a. Or he la
1e t,; nasi TINS 1s ~ The other side can claim. On
NJ aPrancipie may be easily demonstrated that
vi ssZ Plsss T9 dsoa. e
ing the a1icms: Fint, Overdrait is what part-
oei oea ofaTs more than be has right to draw Sec
~ ibe snn osssa1a q partner represented
'es5 T.. 'e sot'L o6t1in '.n AZ eq1sliiy With him.
FL. opInk 'eil rs mat the drifts Of the several \
e. as 20 ,e. 5an IA X; FL ;h smoantsa
ncc = between bis computations and tue books on
e. sGose " 1 ihs s Cooley had drawn fias56a;