New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1865-05-24
SUPREME COURT-Cncrr-M a9.--Before Ju'tiC
WHLLEs.
CURIOUS DIVORCE CASE.

This suit presents soe peculiar features, the de-
tendsn 'e,in up in def tbs. The plaintiff noi lbs we
gaintiG aging bin In addition TO the ad: OF sdueiy wrh
yo. sreanent Of her and OF her children the following
john simpson .,s, d-Knew HE psin,id and dersnl,ni
became arqgsinted wh trEl Ia 1876 lie b)srdcd AZ NJ
snrrw.ri; p'slrhG livn3 there wife hero were
three for children IN tie house belonging 70 NJ Ifu
Trust hi. Wife, and he supDo,ed se was anything else
wife woad not have brought hii family 70 that House
question Court witness sad defendant usually al
dressed p1n.n n'sei; o,,,, ,s ,,,,,.. er, mar
y. ssnrsy counse for lanli Certainly be did end If
i. q ne imposed upon ne would have aiha'h your
cl.,n,. TIE ID lnsAs gentleman, s.r."
Mr. Byrne-f have 10 doub' Of IT,
H. d. safe t.S II Tat e hrst became hcGuainted WIN
lie pa4ti.. In g Or l tire. years AZ wnd they board
ell With wlnru 80 go Soadwsy an! were hHo"n % M
AID M' T. hey lived >,e sooni ~ s,e sp
W b y nNs a1 steele Of ths kef.et.
oher ,n5 eee'ae a.suai1ed WIN n IS 10 and hoy w.,e
known Mr. md SIR. Trust, witness had Lss SsishA'
Cso..sIsmnea-Iisd hssIa tina, Mr. Tr9., h,da re in
Ens4ni nevos heard Mrs. Trust called MsdsWe DanpeT
1895 tsc.m. acquainted Nip pan,a IN sts ysirf wa,
,hen Ap@p.ng house With defendant they yei together
and VIC, wEos had heard defendant address P'nia
6ro...,snnea-Ns,e heard Tru. say that he had wife
In England bit asd understood hist ne hai AWE Pror 70 W
marsso Wi plaintiff and that she had a1Ald ned ti 10,
y-ator, never heard the Cnrisan name oi dr'shafnt
vile bus UNDERWOOD she bal.ctdsncsr " one "
the tnra.rrs
DR. S.hoonnaler testified that he resides a. Flushing L.
prsiei l. Ibis action had done dentistry business
fOr Mr.. Tr,; aaa defend NJ paj the bills and the parties
lived ;oe,tbef az r.n 'nd VIE.
,cs;,.lsmined-NE9 h"sii ee,endan. address rlsiaf
q ls via Trs:i .s,l dchl iint hst .ir In England
Dr. Grun ,c.unoi Ne snrw .hc plf'e. In ls'- va, esed
IA by Mr. Tnst attend Ma Trt and was retained tbef
family phyan; thai eiid born, and MI irnst
recognized HE chi MI Irust always spoke % Nr'
frost his wife, and witns'. never sne" OF h' having any
Constance Z u, testified she daughter Of plaintiff
and ~fepdt h. ir.t SEPARATION occued 1850 is5l
and they aervTd came together and sssn eel srsed IL
1856; witness 10 yeas Old when tie trt 'spsai9n oc
CURED Der isthor asays calico her mother h We" snh a.
had frequently inToju Ell n-r e asnred The name o.
ap-I after she dismissed nom me louos wher- ahe
had been locked or oon.d' ahls period Ia the yosr 1873
Andrew Trust testsdA son Of the parties hs h1ier
and moil asy. h,d addressed each other sn and wife
th.y rparutsd Ia 1855
exsmned-iJ not s,enp. 10 ,,ri,. hi, fher ye'er
dsy lie had however, ceniered lis sber had i1.ieiscd
ell claims rrspesi father b. his children ca account
OF no Lad Purued toward his mother and his cAi
Witness too we'll the relation existing between
hmss nd til defendant oder any violence TO hin.
Redirect, Conduct u cefsadsn, toward plaintiff was ex'
ce~d'n iy cruel
iarhs Tonpsin, t-,ide' rssd-s in Houston. fIui
defendant fer about hive yess del-tdent
has cd wine.. IN Iwcny-oaih st. do no, know on 10"
my peril ,sni Il nine tines icirndsn hss
Waited me al sHy time in the evening Indignantly
Madame IonpkiI. t-s'hed-hr Trust intimate with
with her d.uSh liter W. lnendy With heI dsugi
her daughter had her children Mr.. trust
rvcou-c wh-n Of tbs children died who the
undertaken wss or who Pad h. O the other o"d nA'ned
Manfred Ga rlbaaI !, !. stlll living
Counsel for Plaintiff. az raise your all"
Ni,ncs-"I won't do H.
Counsel for plsin,ia-"yrry we'll; leave Il alone then"
Never heard ths, Mr. Tnst .uor TO her daughter
when daughter worked for Mr. rt she received . per
week for do not know whether the child which
did lad or not
Tho Coun hero adjourned to Wednesday morning at 10
O'Clock.