, 1865-03-16

fe patent for the United States; that complainant
vas to furnish $so, 600 eapitalApnd means for The
and e. aana as
to be con. f'ered US 40 much capital stock; that
defendant promised 70 ass19a 70 comblainant the
fndont apreed to personally assist and superin.
tend the manufacture Of these improved p18nos.
giving his whole time, knowledge and skill;
donea, as peompisna:1. 1T rented rem the breE building @
known as no. ia North Water street, At the
mon1hy rent Of s1oo q that tie F% rented the
monthly rent Of SUI, for The purpose q disposing
Of the patent right and selling the ssid improved
planes that 6s \ f t5s b
neans are needed complainantls ready and wiling
to furnish them.
The hill charges that Pistorious nesleets and re-
fuses IN assign tho undivided half Of The patent,
ia @ Be tR g
OF the Court, entoining b1na from dispasing any
part Of his interest in said pstent The writ was
4 biIl vas also yesterday aled in this Court
~ Enel1ne Castle against samaet 1shaG. Edward
h; rtin, ozios L. Stevens and Edward 3. Casne:
The BIZ ssts forth that complainant Is the VILE Ok
the day preceding her marriage. and in contempla.
ton thereof, deed Of settlement or anteuupttal
agreement was msde between Enellne Burnett Of
the first Part, Thomas Whit!ock OF the second part
and E f. Castle Of the third part, In which COM
planant conveyed cer'ain real estate Of which she
vas petseseed In her Own right to Thomas Whit
lock; a. trustee. upon the following conditions,
to.wit:
1st. That until the so1emuizafion Of the intended
marriage. ne trustee ehuuld pay oyes all incomes
and. THAT after the marriage, the trustee should
pay over nil net receipts to Complainant upon her
Of her husband.
i Sd. That the trustee, should at tho request of
ssfd wife expressed In writing, sell or dispose OF
ae 70 I ana nvees Ia 3 oyer M % be
4th. That in case Of the death other husband, all
The estate nd property held in trust should be re-
9Th. That in caso Of the death Of the trustee, his
executors or aseigna should convey to any party
nominated by complainant
Castle hat lis ntenGeS n vile should eniey 6s
rent and income Of the estate, free from his iu-
reference or control, and that she should viii Or
devise the same as abe chose.
disposition as trustee, Feb 9, 1851, by decree OF
The took County Court Of Common Pieas, on pet1-
acph Fllkns appointed In his stead; that Whit'ock
n The 1s,a Of Nov isl, u T. Isthe snd wife i ani
three acres IN the N. Of SIS. y. K Sec. 81.
7. 10, n. R. Il E., purchased BY said tiustee at
eonplaln,nntg , Isquest ont Of ihe proceeds Of her
estate that Ftlktn., trustee, by deed OF dale Aug.
g, 1856, conveyed to VIM. e. Davis and Edward
Martin for pretended consideration Of $13 ON The
aeoye Gesc1teed property; that on Aug. y. 1859,
said Fuk1ns, trustee, and E. Il. Castle, her hps-
band, executed second deed Of the same proper
y to The eame parties fora like consideration;
that both deeds were frauds between FIkins and
the grantees, and Others and thtt che was Induced
BY false representations to sign the deeds OF con-
yrIance; that at the time the deed was 1igned she
vas In poor health, and troubled by the pscuniary
dihlculues Of her husband that a1l execution had
been tssned against her husosni for g. 600, and
ley maze upon the household goods Of complain
10 sasisly that Elktns was deeiroa. Of sat
II. and that to that end he conspired with the
grantees to make the purchase from him as trus-
that to carry cut this scheme they represented to
the complainant that unless she would make snch
sale and thereby pay The execution. she would be
ruined, aud her furniture sold 10 pay the same
that believing these Representations she sisncd
the said dceds; bnt complainant insists that her
were divided between Filkins, Davis and Martin
that On May I'd, 1855, the soid trustee had convey
T. e. e ss ,s's pfsepsf secure n trust ass2 &
was wholly. void, because moi IN accordance
toned, and With ne statutes II such cases made
aud provided: that Edward Martin. Sept. +, 1855,
by quit claim, sold HI. interest IN the above de-
1ssa @ of Has ana nd r 'R
conveyed the safd. property to Andrew uarvie, in
sp to secure 13 noa payable to qas O.
ice 90 Of w. ,be s1 frs1ud III involved ' and nd vas @
in fact party to e; that Davis was indebted to
the said Stevens in the said sum Of SO. 600 long
was made to secure hat debt; Tint Harye, on The
3Uth Of August 1869 offered the premises for sale,
and prstended to DECD them to Samuel Isham for
$aCt0. aud execute add him deed Of the same.
The bill fnr:her shows. that this deed and sale
were but part Ut thefgeneral system Of fraud be-
fore mentioned, ond that the purchaser had fall
notice Of eomplsinant's rights in the premlses,
I'm NJ ho
and forbade him to purchase the property:
The eomplatnant further shows that pz7is is
6e e a asd and s hf It Il IL @ e s
death be Was still acting as her trnstee; thst o.
J1ne @ 16, lseo complainant md her husband, fled
iinp, praylng for lie appointment Of c. c. L.
Parks as the SUCCESSOR of F1lkins
hat Parks VIZ appointed trustee by !, decree
Chancery Of said Courk did On tie 18Th Of March,
1881, execute deed to Parks Of the trust property
belonging 70 complainant; all OF which was known
to !sham when he purchased the property afore-
The bill alleges that I.ham insists that he has an
indefeasfble tide to the property bought at the.
suit IN eteetment IN the United STATES Circuit
Cpurg to obtain possession Of the premises, to the
manifest injury Of complainant, and to asfra1d her
nent above mentioned.
The bill concludes with the usual prayer for re-
seztbed a. fraudulent IND void. 41 ''.''' '''7
;REcoRDEn's couRr-B.fors 1dgs Fan Bu,en;
found serdst ot guity II the case se ot Ss People
". Charles Lewis. indicted for the larceny Of
clothing from tho Richmond House. This Was not
hut was resumed Oh the assembling Of the court,
yesterday morning. Tbs defendant Hss con-
The. Ease Of the People vs.. Cormach, Indicted
for obtssnlng money By falso presences was aken
up and partially tried. 1t will be resumed this
T., - = .,,, ~ 4ho p,,r,o =. Qsrrdorr ,rdictaa