, 1865-05-27
THE LAW COURTS
Tobacco In Observation-Disclosures Lands
-heclccted Wlres-AppeallnE Prts.
olives vs. B0rEtA-
huEdEF-Adu11ry and Robbery.

UK11xD STATES CoCHT-Btfort yu8d<s D1rIs
dxd Drtaasond.-A case appeared In this Court
yesterday 10 Obtain the Interpretation Of the law
regsfdipg The dtpositlon Of large quantity OF
tobacco seized rome time ago by the Collector OF
Internal Revenue, from the ranuf4ctory OF Van
Eta. Friedm.n & Co., upon The grounds that the
oHners wtrc attempting to infringe the revenue
laws reeastlipg the dutY TO be paid upon IT. The
question before the Court was: vhethet the Col.
lectr1 in the dfpoeal Of the property WAS Eubteex
to the oruers Of the Court upoa heariag the
fsttf, 3udge Drummond decided that a. the case
eEme for uecfslon before the Court. the Collector
would become responsible as M,r.ha1 to obey
The faetf Of tho case are somcxhat .inrnlsr aud
appear to be substantially as follows: Some
months ngo. before the 1nposal OF the present
tsx Ipnn tvbsceo. the article IN question was SELL
irC At ntout twenty c: ute ponnd- Anticipating
The tuty, the defendants In thetf contracts to eup
ply tnb. Ut times the future, ttipu1x'ed tnat
tbe purchaser sbunla pay the 1ax II levied. 10 ad'
dision 10 The p.icx Of twtntJ cents per pount. In
eccurdsnee wlth thi. agreement, wien q. duty o.
about len cents ~ss lerled. they reeelye1 The In:
et pss f., ne s.;,9 ,5 res c9sstsr Of
ceived ssds the legitimate price Of The toeaeco &C
tOrd,pE trrihe prey!ou. contract, held that Il
shcp'a be Itah'e 10 an additional duty, and &c
lhe Cont appoipted appraisers to determine
the value 2, the arssle and r. r. days The case
@ pf9a1s'y c9m9 ~ lqs 5aas:s o,, m,
G1ry.-1he Grind JurT in thfa Corrt, alter ind
ing the foirwipg four true ILLS. we're discharged
Horsce brown Vas indicted for The willfus mur-
de, OF Philip Opcrusn, On the track Of 1he Pitls.
burrh l. Furt Wayne RntlrOad, yesterday week,
under e'rcumstan es Of the greatest aid mast M.
provoked brutality, rs tcpornd IN the 1AIrCsE
Mary ClAr5. charged with the murder OF het In
fanl 1l!eeiutnate child. ~ stranelins aod hiding
1t upJ.r n1tttrtss. at her fcsioeGce on Reuoea
greet, was aso Indicted 1of murder. The prisen-
q IL widow, her husband having died about two
sra t9e tte ons wss II
tofIoeins widoHhooa. shs has two Legitimate
The jury also indicted Ansust He!nlelb for
auulteTy, hnG John Thite, afi1s Dm1t1 Soouau,
4 eili plsy,ne for divorce w.. hled b Mary
whom ebe ASSERT, wToagfn1iy deserted her, amer
IL scafs Of married life. in 1s6a. Afl51t asks
fuE q ;tssorilnn Of the uupttal bond and the sole
mil. ares of whom amount 70 ,hirteeo ysa-s.
A Alil was ht}ed in Chsncery BY Robert aefvey,
"eo'e executor Of the 1s.t will and Testament ot
5@et snt n t.f 3de e
trr the gear 1858 James AcFvey, by bis agent,
Malon D. Ogden, s9ld qqaotty 1f l lsad I'd to Az A.
Of whom are now deceated, and The defendant
sherman. The purchase. ag1sed to p1. for to- y;
.and sso,ooo in yeasly tnstallnsnss: The ta1s.;
Is@ e ~ :! Iarehase M; Honey and. repaid .
lin or him, etc. Plaintiff coIapla.ns TINT
the "partes OF fne fteoaa past aaSe LII nus ~.
Oiled their confract, spa eonseqaeuu! suss toe
l1viI e purchaser sna ln9 agmin'sIha*o.s t9uc OF
whom IL the notorious 6nck Mosfssl ol re dc.
reastt CONTRACTORS, 10 recover toe money Que to
MIR Of the land told.
C1RcC1T CouHT-0JeTe tSage nttsdMs1la
this Court frtt WAS COMMENCED bI - one rat-
rIrk Murphy. I've say iona " 10 dtstpeuish Mr.
.sn11hT jrofc another similarly nsmsd gentleman
IN The cir J to recover d'nases eustalnsd oy hin
by The cea,h o. neIte kso - K;n1. etrsst sss
noF,nS noFM7tG ~ tnt nuitc Settled ID lii mind
NJ. Musk1s ,',4se r.n trrasnsf the lcconotye pr
3hL1lcl ene uu..s 20 .nsSnei ne horse hnt feeIs
the toeomons, ~ re4ie1n thst Inc nnhsnn4 ari