, 1865-12-03
LAW, INTELLIGENCE,
The eAT1eaezs, ,, LlbeF Caxe-Another
Suit Against the OIty-The
Trial Calendar for
the DAY.

N-n~pAA SoHh1 VI TIE UNITED STAIE4-NQN,
1htmds Dt1uao7d, Judge.-Tho people OF tbe
United States, -. John B. Zimmerman, Roober,
OF q. s., mall. Vestict-'' Not guilty."
C1Reulr Coun1 OF CooK Couxz1-HoH. E. 8.
IFtacrns, Jteige.-Van q. Higgins, u. Wilbur F,
Storey and AnauiAs WGdcn. Tho trial OF this
case waa continued and occupied the entire iay.
the case On behalf Of The defendants being couc,u
ded md The cause being left for ths paintirt to re-
but.
The greater part Of tho forenoon session
waa occupied by the discussion OF the cues.
ttou OF Law ratsed On the proceeding evening.
The question WIS whether on the cross e1unipat,ou
OF Ms. MeAuray, she could b. inquired Of IN ria
ticn to conversations testified by her To haYe oc.
cu1Ted, hut which she had not been inquired Of In
hcr examination in The object aimed 1t IN
introducing snch testimony WIS to rtbpt the tdts
Of the existence Of promise by palntIG to deed to
the uitneaa the houte In which she resided. in ths
event Of her husbanda death In the service. This
Court excluded the testimony by decision rs fol.
Lows: "lfh w1s question simply ~ to tho cross.
examination Of this witut 8, The Court might he
disposed to enlarge the rule, perhaps let, 1tfsa
question in regard 10 tho admisnbility Of Original
testimony, land that Il the form In which the cues
tou now presents Itself before e should not feel
;he sa1ne liberty to enlarge 1t. The questios uust
be then whether This I. admissible a original tes
umcnJ: Counsel now withdraw, as upderstand.
the poa1on that they seek TO draw this out Al le.
Riumate cnes-exRmiuation ot Tho wipeas, Tost
Ysn@an III, nessins. M az e's1n sSea oaesSa q gS
testimony II I. claimed On The part Of the PLAN
III that II y original testimony. for the resson
eee how thla case stands. to nnd oil Via, is ". W.
Or dimcu1ty in reference 10 this case This Il an
o ses Il Re raes Il Fl. md
Abel there now stand tWo pleas. and only tvo peas.
FIT hs gs1srsa issue ef rot gully nd
iahl.h iheiF plea Of then yeJ clear
that that malice which tho law implies IN The pnbl-
cation Of an untsae ststement eI,sts and rlaintld
qas:aon p. L. il ths t .,.te%eet ae1eet
y 1ss sss .S1,,sG Y a9us I'd thai
tion 10 The malice which Is ret tuned IN de- cssc or
The publication Of The statement alleged to be disc
,has the1e as @ actual malice IN .ts md has
Ss6,7. 9adsf ,s,. IL s,s ssaSa sss suessss
Taltee. therefore n m,aeation of damages. csen
iho9eh G Il 40 ss1aea s9 prove tss tEulh oi he
We ase now discussing. n tought 10 bs introduced
except = understand undef the plea Of tusti6ca.
IF. Sc s6s anea Sa b, ID
zone nos Taish s1aa wsFs b bl9t11S. tSa. to VI
SA@sNA%~
:sss,a nj Hsi' hs,a n not sota: q:
aei si T.. h s5Rp'ossa 5s9 II 1
were done; o. !ha paTt Of the pisIn@ % 1am a. a..
rosea 20 e. TO allow he proof q any acts Of klndness
o. rebnutng what the defendsnts may seca "a ess
tahlah. act sfahst act, but to tay thai the de.ara
liens Of the platntd, not accompanied b. my octa
ca1nlnaiely for lis own benefit, d post;on thssS
! eu9Ieea, nevH beard fnkcn before In my lie. Il
Is =atd hesc that this tus Ia continuous ac1. ana
Ars. McAn,1a5, Iunnioe through period m Of ihrse -
years, ean b used he1e In bis Own tnvor confess
havo listened ver patiently 10 the long arrn-
which has been read, and hare fecn nor heaTd MOTH
lng which 1t seens 10 me, can cstHblish such po.
The czoss-e1amtnatlon Of Mn. McHut.ay vas
then, Aster somo time concluded, when Robert s,
mi'h the psaintid TO eeeu1e TO Mrs MeNpl1xv 500
lot where ehe resided Robert Malcolm was then
examined. He testified that writ for torcihle de-
atne5 ", e, h%p1En. b PLAINTIFF .ssnss tenant
judgment rendered May ., Of ihe sane year.
Inc defendant then opened IN Eebui sAlL producing
snase % os;s q the ,s Superior conrt, who ~as the
lie eeei list DO fied the nul; that jadss wilson 70
court o7er wsiea IN iaet paintd then N and
Nj. Thomas, counsel for ,he widow, had declined
10 Aytl himself Of tho ground Of objection.
ssr &c H. L. ss ~ 1SPdS e s.es
=. 11ao. Tnis Is tho seoona @ aesioa Fs;aliins ha
The ttrcwotft preceding the meeting of the BEN.
o1atfc Contention In Chicago, CoIenta Ellis, tht
wife Of the psrtent plaintiff, walking upon Wext
eoae let nun rsi.ed to N Sid sdeua1s. se1ereis i
1ntu1tne her. \ action was brought aud uiod. and
Maj 5th last TIC plaintiff recovered Of The city
-@,t$ e. A..
common Law to recover BY the husband for The los
Of service Of The Wite to1 coets Of attcndancs &c
SUPERIOR CouRr.--Sot in tesaton. The Deem
6t9 Term opens Monday. when the ca]l Of the calen
loa-1. Volk et i. X. 6easet.
,,9Aa As1saon =: Manhattan
| lle-4. Thin w. Cato.
1,s5-S 1is5 !, EaPi. =: c!ty & ch,eseo. :.
| ll9-a Gebenausr ~. LII ct a.
1lss-s Dlits VI. Brown.
James A;s s1.son ~. Peter shtnp. Assnnpsit-
defendant u endorse7 Of 4 note for ts0o It nm
ytan' datc trou August - 1854 signed By jane
Irssc w.tx.1 ~. 1sa,c Wolff T,c.,,.,-a.n
seee laid at FL, ,on Declarations not MED.
| lnrcnz Bchx ". John Rupp, Tte.pass tsroace.
Laid at 81, ,oa to recover for injury resulting f1S1
ssss hs = noe = aes u pu sh,s sssa's a,
| sued.
Charles Sheer u. John R5.n and gdwas;
oi = Tha ~9s .aea e. aa Sa r.
allegation that defendants have attempted 70 hinde
fnd sd de.J creditors by ma8inS pretended falc o
CoCH7r Coun1-Hon. James B. 1Fu;peu, ,1vtoe
a,s 515,a .+oE .. gf'nkfan Webster. Admadissztof.
Estssr Of CIsus 1umpscn. John Tozuoeou IN,
srpon,ed administrator under bond tea o1 esn. WI
I