, 1865-11-02
THE CITY.
LAW intelligence,
The Insurance Trial--.Another Conrad
Case'--Interesting Patent
Suit.
LOVE. MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE
DRUNKENNESS AND CRUELTY
CIVIL SUITS.


UsI1ED STATES CoUKr-Bgors .Tut9es papls and
DT17ENssHd.-Upon the conclusion Of the asyu.ucnts
OF counsel In the Of Orlando Curtis for the
Of james Pattee acainst the Home Insurance Com
pauy Of New Hayeu, Conn.,, the jury were charged
BY The Court. and retired to determine upon their
verdict. Af>er brief abscnce they returned YER
Dict against the defendant and assessed p'aintin's
damages at $20C0. One peculiarly in Tits verdict
Ia that it Was upon tho ground Of excessive DANA
ges that a new trial was granted, and the former
The case Of Sarah ]. Warnocl and Thomas Kelly,
Of the firm Of Wnrnock s Kelly, Of Boston, Mass,
agatnst Geo. Gilbert and Joseph Sampson, consii-
tatng tee 1 q Gee 9t ths s
h5 the counsel On either side. This suit has A.
ready been tried once this summer, as previously
repofted in the TRlBuxE. Ii Is brought ID assump-
drafts tor 500 and s70o respectively; drawn By j.
z. Conrad, and rendered worthless by his failure.
house, upon receipt OF checks drawn BY the de-
fendants- The evidence In tho casc was concluded
5eeterday afternoon;
:. Booth; Of Rochester, N. T., against +. ". BIZ.
ter md Thomas q. Baxter, the well known mill
t.nshsrs e this eity doing business nnder the
for injunction 10 be issued By TIC Court, restrain.
ING t1e desnaants trom n;'an9taeturin: Or eeng
IT, En1S a. H
chine and patented It September a0th, 1859, renew
Ing bis patent November 9Th, 1864, 40 that defend.
snts action in the premises Is an Infringement upon
.SuFEn1on CounT-B93are Judge J. E 9ary.-A
blu Supplying for divorce was fled " Hortense
Curtis, rpen the grounds Of cruelty and drunken
aeTe aga,nst at a0 Jonata3n ,, Gut Ths
Joliet, In this Stntc, in June, 16J6 since which
t1me she has resided with bia On he whole, about
~ ra rat @ ne 81 aas esel oaFea as
,aItbssnStn@ har asctinnatss r1nrt no
@ r. .leafSa ii, ncI Mia sYstemac DsataS aad also
s EeSn g1iitg Of hahslnal drunkenness. She has no
cn'IGtGn; .sasI t. cb a,,.
a19sa, aEarnst 1anes q seafe' AiaEy E sea.e and
IL. M1laM nt ~. n.snop. 70 ohsfm ne satstac-
to ii a 81 @ %
qusesstipan; s,5a T. ,.no
o!l n G5aneGTy va n!ea BY albert Colsn and
~, III ia'as. ~ uam Sons9n ana oinGss % %
tan "a I!s .! some pfepetly if4 recently belonging
" an.uouJ Junneon oece1sed. Inc dcieuuann all
fe5'cents sm,t ,e., .. saSluna e1a aaa Gana1a. az q
Frsnk 1o@ p p Ea.ly, IN which damages were hid at
go. tt 1 Wue:pe Gn!f wa nleo.
ucreMiet - sxasM snd 4y3s'i. WI eGeneea 9y aobe
Sclotntck q ,Gauenaesd as2inst U. e. Brown.
namases "a Meie lAd ~ S2W. be}ohd The prEetpe
foT summons 1sa i no Paper wetG Med:
Heavey, ne defendant entered his confession Of
1ooFmeHt upon psoMleeofy noIe drawn NJ him.
auo Iaea ~. SMea9o, ue'ooeE ~, lsao, lot S.u9.
!a"'e MIL 1n'eses1 al ten per cent one DAY alet
GAZE;
ca. oiii asKng .oF alvofce VA nsed oy Alphonso
hat Seh1t 4Enast ~ VIE potatnea schmidt n:s
SeHuiE- lne Petuone1 aiesed that nc married
az vie fn 5ts Sly On lhe llth or February 1851,
t1dtreInaineo Wild nef unul the beginning Of March
" Mhcn Fl haT1ng enNttcd % private in company D:
esn ~ uno!s 1g !e!t a1s aome and pFneeeded
70 tne seat 81 Wnt. iie feIns1nen Sooth WIN h13
teG.nscn. un.!a the spnng o. leh When be RETURNED
home bone on M fnr!oueh, nd stayed unti! the 18Th OF
unWelcome discovery that Mrs. Schmidt was en-
fefFk. The husband charges hIR wife with com.
mfttirE aaulty with HARRISON @. Reedforn, aud in
consequence, sxka for decree Of marital separa-
t!or- On the 11th Of August Of the present year,
the defendant became the mother Of child, tbs
ground that he nsrer saw hts wife from March 1864
until Masch OF the succeeding year.
The complainant claims th1t he has always treated
hte uffe With kindness and consideration eye1 eup
plsfng her With means for her mainIainanre.
"A entt ID repleytn WIS commenced BY Catherine
Dyball hEaInst Jamea D. Brewer to recover p0sscs-
sion Of sil!cr-plated cabinet Grover 4 Bakers
taincd from her By the defendant.
In tue suit Of Hans Ne.seIhams aca1ust II,
Schultz ~ appeal .as tnAcn by The complainant
from Judgment Of Justicc Has, in favor OF the
In suit brought by plaintiff to recover
damages claimed At go.
Upon The affidavit Of Cornelius W. Mufphy, agent
o! Francis Kenalt and others. vzit Of attachment
waa issued .satnst the property Of William Neal
pin and Benjamin P, uiuman to tecoyee IS. 551,M.
being the principal and interest OF q psouistory
note Tor 366:A., dated Cincinnati duly III 1866, and
payable three month"; nftcz date.
log adjourned for vacation untii Mouday morning