The Indianapolis daily herald. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1865-1868, 1865-11-28

With great pleasure vs. Rad The following
article IN tho Terre Hauts Journal Tho shin
Ing talents, and sterling patriotism Il Mr..
NoomIsE- make him b prominent mark Tor
The Republicans q shoot ~; but note wei.
they'll not kill him. Time win show. Be pa.
ticnt
"The Indiana Journal make. our notice o.
the invitation a. the Hon. Mr.. voorhees, % de-
liver q literary aldrc-. before the citizens Of
Petersburg. Va, next January. pretext Tor
rrhash II on repeated aud n On fcfuted cal
umuies against that gentleman. The exploded
libel. that b. promised &" the people e the Old
Dominion a. bring up one hundred thousand
men 10 their aid II the YANKEES invaded
her soil" and that he published two cdi-
tions" q hi famous speech in favor Of the ac-
quitfal a Cook. the accomplicc II old John
Brown. one ads otafiug es-lOn Tor eircrla-
ton tn the south aud the other for circulation
in this state, with the obnoxious doctrine
omitted. are again repeated la the Journal.
Now, II there T. a man on the face u the earth
peculiarly distinguished Tor his frankncs- and
holdncss IN ayowing the sentiments II his
heart. ID. W. VOORHEES, l. the man. IL l. a
perfect stranger o. equifocstion. prcvarica-
ton and artfll dodging; and " hat h. l., hc T.
from convictions a. sincere a. thoy arr exalted.
lie has. IN the famous publication la which.
la reply o. General Darlington. he took out
letters u administration 0n all that remained
~ that mans rcputi0n aud estate. completely
demolished the =. foo.ooo" lie; and. Ia regard
10 the speech on the John Brown raid, ne never
published but a single version II n. and We
defy the Journal % collate the alleged two
editions II u all moon-hine. and IL would, In
fact, be- Just a. fair 20 charge him with ap-
proving the raid because he attempted 90 save
one % old Browns accompliccs from the pen
atty due b. the crime, Of which they were both
equally guilty n participants.
i Hgs If.Ifr-
ndrs article which Il characteristic Of party
that knows neither law nor justice whenever
they have the physical power 60 accomplish q
party object. We refer o. where the editor.
referring 90 the ridiculous attempt Of MIR.
Washburn 10 contest his seat in Congress,
says, "you viii have plenty Of time after the
month 81 January next. IRE hare no doubt
Congress will give you your walking papers
at an early day"
Elected by several hundred majority. nothing
but the most perfect faith In the partisan bias
and ycnality 81 Congress, could induce any man
to say that he " had no doubt" the majority OF
those now In possession 81 that body would
pcrpctrate an act 81 such fragrant injustice.
not upon MIR. VOORHEES, alone. but upon the
rights o. n honorable and high-mindcd a con-
stituency a, can be- found Ia the Union II
shows that, whether Ia a minority or majority.
the radicals are determined 90 rule by foul
means or fair. upon the principle. we suppose
that their opponents have no rights which they
are bound 10 respect, and that. when an elo-
qucnt Democratic champion l. 90 be got rid Of
the end justiiics the means
Wen, all we can say Is, that as low an esti-
mate n we place on the Justice Of rampant
fanaicism. we can not believe, until we see II.
that majority Of the next House Of Rcpres-
cntatyes will be 80 lost TO shame a. o. realize
the hopes over which the journal chuckles
with such self-evidcnt complaceney and glce.
But, as Richie used 10 say. nous rerr0ns.