New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1865-02-15

tSSss ~ ~. deroecn Of or iury bnildnss or other
rcal personal property, IN Consequences 'N0
respectfully submit the following
Resod That the bills or ea.s Of the euw g. h,n
h Consequence Of the rics IN July 1893 be oda.a anu u
[ b and me j. herby sutcrled end requested TO pay the
SANE upon the parties executing release !u OF 81 ~.
s Of III. Board (. hereby directed to ranimit TO the
Controller the original above mentioned win Tue
tesnmouy ind acconr,ny ing papers VIZ; enn
Thomas Aidrdge ninety dolars w
f. Avrcs four hundred aud eytntyhve dollaIs. 40 w
A. NJ Aier,on. eleven thousand siz bundled aud
tb-ty.s,x dollar. aud xtyrr ceuts....... l1tb b5
Grorgf Willie, eleven bundled doilsIa...... LOO "
Tie ComS ee on Annual Taxe, to whOIs referred The
petition Il Frank q LocAhime iof the remission
Of personal tax, respectfully
Tha the petitioner is resident o. the County 10 engaged In
business in Washington Market has been assessed on persona
property valuation three thousand dollars Tor the y'
i6i that he las personal pro, except his household
rDue and the necessary fo the transaction OF bus
Your Committee are ofthe opinon that the tax against NJ
Lock elmer has been legally mposd The petitioner naha
ha. been rsdent OF the County for some time s engaged
in business here and attending is transaction a. the
tine The assessment rolls open for pubic examination
II existed ample opportunity was dhcrded i 70 cor
against hi has confirmed and the tax books for 1864
placed in the hands Of the Receiver OF Tnes fos these
silerine the petition Of Mr.. LociheimeT.
HE Comniee ON Annual Taxes to whom referred the
petition Andrew smith M the REMISSION oi personal
tax, respectfully
That the petitioner spp AIRED before your Committee nna
stated hs he had been assessed resident Of the Couny OF
ir yS o S o" so hay he %
and has been resident Of ne City Of fr'okiyn for oyer ten
The afidsvii detailing these act. T. her,rno srneAcd
Mr. n ~ sen rtg Sn Dem e's over Ten
years in the City OF brooklyn In this surprise your Com
Ss fo e.@pe1 o @ oId eiR Sr on Of Saith from
Brooklyn directory tic Assessor himself being refdsni
having been rsi1eut ofte hy Of h3osyn In s"ner
event the error pal aoe and 'houa n9t bh.e @
reasonable be assigned The loss to the onny
couGtIlbc and ldds 10 tie burden Of is1paye- 81 r
Couay your Committee submit for adoption tue following
resou ION: = g., T.. A.,
year 1901 be reiHtcd said smith having been sssiden Of the
Cry Of Brooklyn for over ten yetIs.
WITCH odcriedb 10y the following vo,e' -
Afrna,ive-s upervors DAVIS. n.y. Fox, fur1y Roche
sLook, smith Tweed ana iimauu--9.
The Committee Annual T'&rs, 20 whom wa' referred TIE
annexed peuon y. ". wnihcd, Tor eorTeeon oil tax
respectfully
That NJ Whitfield presented application Tor the corec
ton Of his personal tax Of tJ wi te Tine prcscn'a oy
Ii l. on the ground that be did not appear before the Tom
mite. , ~, . Al,
NO or i,e and 4de 9th thi the in, him
was clcc error, nl'.gch a. &c conu- nr' Of Iele-
and ArssuIets received is apple ton within ~ l,e Ire'
r5cd b. aw, Gnd upon IL 9th ssleJ li hey wond erase
Ii, ,sx
~ now aver. that he ha time worth any Per
soIe property over bis just debts and isbitie'
Thee ia',in,nt. ell ssor 70. ait bone oK By TIC
record. o. lf uf o.tcaiu. CI thl. E,afl
IN view Of tie above. Il ioio",ins q snbniiicd
Re'oired Thtt the pes.,ni TX aseed 'r,ins, John w
Whitfield. or the ytsf G1. $1,000 be aud the SINE is
hereby rrni,oi lie having eppeatd at the proper before
tho Commits oner, OF and Ase,,ncuis and had tie
need bit through ofTes on 'hef pat tie assess
Which was sdopted by the following vote;
AhimgpS-S peryisoI, navi' Eiy, f0I' Pofdy' Roche
The Committee Annual Iaae. to whom r'ered the
annexed petition o. reverend w. ". Dias for remission OF
peIsoual tar respectfully
That M Diss Is minister Gospel les been s,.essed
Oh lefona property et valuation 81 Two ilol',nh t9.i i
the year AMER ase % ten yrss be abs 10 have the
tax ilus .apo'ed nutrd 10 power bong weed IN t.r
Board Of Snp,v'or 10 fm taf'' o. correct eir ' VI tAa
:ion, however cery macasd inaocr your olon'irr 70
AK 10 be dchsrerd from zoe 1il'r couayauon 81 ,n.
peaon OF M Da' for the 'eusson Of has personal tai IN
Which wa, adopted.
The Committee AHnnsi Tre' 20 whom VI, ,eterred NE
sInes e5 .e,iton Of ne o. tso.. M OIL ''
GIPoKr;
charitable nsttuon he various od aid 4apmsnis
connected 'eIeyh d'Pcns,e i'sc .%, o. m3y ,Isi
and Tor the support Of W owrd families.
Your Conuee satisfied thai the soaiion ia descrV
ins i ',rs lie PROMPT ecion Of this Board tn correcting
Tey would accordingly recommend for adoption the fol
Resoied Tie, 'he ,are. now due and psy.ble on ~
propey Of TIE Odi felows Hal Association u The City Of
Nel ok be- and heFri emitcd md tue said Assoc'
TO rede,ed from the payment thereof
" Mich al ,p,ed ~ the foiOHlns vote;
Shock Smith. Tweed ard " i'ustu-9
The Committee On Annual Tx,s. ~ whom referred the
annexed p;i1u OF John L. Young, for remission OF personal
tax, respectfully
The petitioner represents that lie resides NO % wee
sty Violation Of fifteen thousand dollars ior tbd year
Isl M L.. pcs5oLA Of real ,ftse liable 10 tsxs'ioh
and that h~fr,'e y sq,n ~ as A oeen ND .o.,a
Upon him; he r~t i" As =. - portion o. the
The be- been sworn 20 by N.Y. Young In the
opinion Of your Committee ne P~i9pr not legally en-
titled the relief akeJ fr lie g. and has been fesdrnt o!
the County years. has heretofore paid taxr' and l.
doues acqualted With he requirements Ct the Isi Laws
dgnr The ti1lp tie lax Books were open fr sxamAto
only himself for not attending 10 aud having the
correction made Il the proper time by reason Of mdposi"n
lurng portion OF he tine the Assesmtnt Rolls were oIth
or he,e reasons C0fntse Ia asking be dir
char srd the frhcs oOniehon Of the subject Referred
10 them.
Will vas adopted
n cownr,ee on Annual Tares. 70 whssn has been
ra the annexed petition q YIN. Ii. tAufc Ter VIC cor
| Tectiou Of tax, respec'iasIy
That M Churc !, the owcer o. property Known q No.
Is W1rrereet s.tuatsd in the TLTd ard Of lie City Ct
New.iork. " -,
lars shd the thereon estimated such valuation Tor tO
yesr The valuation heretofore estimated has eeen
liked twety eight thousand dollars nd the tax Calculated
ucordingy he sbovc ssiripen hes been to Mr.
Church. md also by the Deputy Tax COumsioA,r, who
the s9S ss P5,g yrl nd 60 70. sa y'i
orgnsi Roll for the Third Ward tuds that lie
fixed the valuation Of the property H. question at wentys
thousand dosr and that %. euor was made IN copying tie
hooks in the AZ Commissioners Ofce.
TLese facts are 90 clearly e,tabfhed hat your Commute.
have no hesitation 10 recommending 'hst the he
recei and the or tie yel 1874 be estimated
valuation Of 'w.nyest thousand doaIs instead Of thirty
eigit thousand dollars.
T.e mistake having been n1sde by public Officer the
owner should not suffer by reason thereof 49,
These conidsIsoIf induce your tfmiee 10 thoAN Tor
adoption the following rc'olnton: 49, . - ~
,jused In the Third Wsd 81 tho Cry Of NewYork and