Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1865-12-14
EVENING STAR.

u. s. SUPRKNE CoURr.-MosDAY, Dec IL
Hon Green Adams, Of Ky; Hon M c. Kerr,
Of Ind; Hon. T. A Plants and F. M Keith,
Esq, OF Ohio; John Hubbell, Esq, of N. Y;
John W. Stokes, Esq, OF Pa; and VIM. b.
Love, Esq, Of ID. c., Were admitted attorneys
and eouRsellors Of this court.
NO S2 6tna Insurance Company, plaintiff
In error, VS.. Samuel III. Webster. In error to
The Circuit Court of the United States for the
Eastern District Of Michigan. On motion of
MI Carlisle this writ of error was docketed
and dismissed with costs.
No. -. Levi Blossom, appellant, VS.. the Mil
waukie and Chicago Railroad Company The
argument of this cause was continued by Mr..
Buckley for the appellees, and concluded by
Mr.. Gushing for the appellant
NO. 2Ol Inc County Board OF Supervisors
OF sneooygan county, plaintiffs in error, VS..
y, nSo "A. f1ker. TINS cause was submitted
70 the consideration OF the Court on the record
and printed argument by Mr.. j. $. Brown for
the plaintiffs In error, and by Mr.. Carpenter
1or tne defendants in error, under the 10Th rule.
NO H2. Charles COmstock et a., plaintiffs IN
error, VS.. Jefferson Crawford. This cause was
submitted TO the consideration OF the Court on
the record and printed arguments by Mr.. ]. s.
Brown for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr..
Larkin for the defendant in error, under the
Goth rule.
No 20. Paul Queyrouze ct al, claimants and
appellants, VS.. The United States. This cause
was argued by Mr.. Brewster for the appellants,
and by Ashton, Assistant Attorney General, for
the appellee.
Nos ca, 65, and CO. Edward Haight. claim.
ant. &c, appellant, Va. The United States;
Alex 7. Blakeley, claimant, &c, appellant,
vs.. The United States; and Fraser, Trenholm
Co, claimants, &c, appellants, VS.. The
United States. Ordered by the Court that
these causes be reargued on the second Mon
day Of January next
TUESDAY, Dec. 12.-Henry A. Taller, Esq, Of
n T.; VIM. A. Monroe, Esq, of ID. u; Henry
Crawford, Esq, Of Ind, were admitted attor-
neys and councillors of this court.
No. 337. Lafayette Maynard, plaintiff IN er-
Tor, vs.. The United States. In error 10 the
Circuit Court of the United States for the
MI Ashton, Assistant Attorney General this
writ OF error was docketed and dismissed
Nos. 50 and I26. The bark Sringbok, &c. ap-
psllant, VS.. The United States, and the schoon-
er Stephen Hart claimant, &c. appellant, VS..
the United States. Ordered by the Court that
of January next, Immediately after the reargu-
ment of Nos. G., o., and GO.
WEDNEpAY, Dec. 13.-Gilbert s. Miner,
Esq. OF Va, and John Newton Rogers, Esq
Of Iowa, were admitted attorneys and counsel
leTs of this court.
The City of Philadelphia The argument of
this cause was concluded by Mr.. Parker for
the appellant.
Nos. 32O, 32l. and 3e2 12s baskets of cham
payne, &c. appellants, VS.. The United States:
W baskets OF champagne, &c, appellants, VS..
The United States: and The United States, ap-
pellants, VS.. 125 baskets of champagne. Or
dered by the Court that these causes be argued
on me second Monday of January next. imme-
Giately after Nos. "a, Is, 66, 50, and 12s
No. %. The Minnesota Mining Company.
plaintiffs In error, VS.. The National Mining
Mr. Buel for the defendants in error and sub
United on printed argument by MIR. Reyerdy
Johnson in behalf Of MI Romeyn for the
plaintiffs in error.