New-York daily tribune., 1865-11-13
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
Dor,,s.ie Wur Drnma.

~ D0H1eoutc
A pupED SOLDIER AND DEcEIrFUL wIDow--s1hAS']N
DENoUENENT or a MARRIAGE.
SUPREME CoURT-cHANnEns-Nov. ii'-Be'0fa ''''''
lLERKE.
John Brown sgt. John Brosman
The plaintiff in this case tells most roman., !,
and pitu story: He returned after three year. ~
aud an honorable discharge in his pecket to Jersey Wy
put up boarding house kept byone Mrs biyssn, w
presented herself a. oneom widow y.c,ms w, ,e hea
Of the soldier. He told his love- ard was uot is w
children called him papa the wido" s,yea sSo.s and th
brother the widow said held lien claim on her es alsh
ent 90 the Of about 1900 How nice aa. '0a,
be- removed The nearly bonnties were Nei
bph and 10 raise tho money Mr. Brown determined to rten
list lie did 80 IN New jersey, and landed over MS O'u"'
son The end OF the struggle and the returning sode
FASTENED TO rejon the dear wife that was to be.
the hotel but the widow bud dlsappeared In nov
ever appe ared the brother but guam mn,dt,s ao o E
LONGER the brother but the insnted husband deusnas hi
s s s"w yS"n s" %a ana had long boen Mrs
children were mis- chidren tho house bad been ou '
Il he lBrown) called again he would be eliminated rom ""
Brown now seeks redress law and on an affidavit oil me
with other facts has procured order OF arrest AGAINST n
offending Brosman which has proDably Dy thp ''"o '
DECISIONS.
James M. Shaw agt. Alfred Bemey MOTION
rrant.d on payment o costs and disbursements oi enter
Before Justics lsGRAHAS ~, =,
Rsnsp. H. J. Lyon. ss, W o. Fcrd-Orders settled Ga
briela saltzer ss. Alex. STANDARDIZATION denied without
pref judice, kc. . ,
John A. Pullen ag,. The Georgetown Gold Mining CO.
Motion denied.
CIacuir-Noy. Ii-Before Jnstice L. DARWIN SMITH
TIE LAW or FIXTURES.
Jo..ph J. Little art. David ~. Turnure and Others;
This action was brought to recovered the dccnhants
the value Of certain boilers ard machinery in the steam
1wnl at Nos 29 aud 800 Monroes and for the vane o'
onany OF boards tools Sc, sat 60 have been ieit tLefe
IN tle ma
passed under foreclosure sale part % The land 70 w. u
ndlnis or not appeared that Rogers smith the former
ovues Of the lots hod erected building on poHon W e
lots and on tie remainder made excavation IN when they
placed toe boilers These surrounded by bIcts ana
covered successycy with n!n Plates beam. ana dt 70 ne
level Of the yard The machinery was paced IN the pa
uent and tie machinery for driving the saws connected WIN
u and the building. . ,r
They niorgarcd tho property in 1879 to Abraham TarnlIe
f,r 900 giving IS cOater insurance on the buiidlns'
sd nlcIcry end having pnrcha.ed The adjoining ot gave
niorage the whole three for $1,000 70 cover e oid
mortgage aud additional loan Tor 5000 These NOR
subscqufnty forecioscd and the drhdIH' p"us" "
Tho property On the salc.
TIE pantia up tide to the machinery By virtue Of
chael mort .sse nsJo by Rogers smith 70 Caroline v
seer and agned % bin and under Marhss 'ae made 70
him under DsIlct Court judgment The mort;l;e vas a.
lccl 70 been made aier ,he.dssouton OF pnnTip
tie consent q Ar Smith The pltniih proved De
man and refls OF the rhincry while the defendants de-
ncd hlvug suhoed ono 20 refuse any OF ihr hhsy
except such hgod and attached 70 the plidmg Hr
defendants nso proved h, Mr. Rogers had actually TAKEN
sbc property from the mill and sc1 II Tor -N
The main question vh''Gef the toNcr7 bnred N the
earth and the machinery In the building Sefe part u me
realty OF mere ras turcf The Court decided ihlt tie cn'
cuc boilers machinery and saws wbctlr IN ihe rlul's or
not sud the shs0ng .ud betting passed under TIE mortgage
H. NJ Turnu A. he 20 the question whether
.o In charge dcfcnirts tho pant and IN ci"
Il fad been denied ne value % such property. .,
Under this charge The ipy rrntcfc verdict Tor PAINT
for . 90 a fhr value 4 lho movable property
81. Dyet. fof plaintiff. Mr Byue fos d'.enisni,