The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1865-01-19

did Q Up to the time u your marriage sb her
did not Did you GEEK 70 rendsr her d'coe e "a
or snhappy with her husbands A. did ret q state
whether she over complained to- you OF Dor husband
cruel treatment
Mr. FuI!ertoa-I suppose that evidence is Inad1issibe
here
Judge Leonsrd-Ihe testimony Is not proper cross-
examination The objection is sustained
,,ate whether nrs Mllspaugh sought yoar 40
acquainted as most people do; was invited TO Wait
great deal Al her room Q The counsel stated that you
employed every vile and article TO seduce her; did
employ anys A, never In any way shape form
attempted anything Of the kind q Has there any
came back from Indiana the second Tuner A. No,ths
slightest Whore you have beeo stopping boarding
haS mere been any conceaimena A. Not The Alghtest
! NR. HALsTEAD's EVIDENCE.
| Jacob n haistead deposed that he knew Mr. and Mn
MfIspaugh before they went to the Bond Street House
knew Seth Adams; saw HIM in Mrs Mlspaagt,s roon;
he would come into the a few noments aad then
60 OUT them Broadway together osce hey vert
walking together could not say whether they walk
tng arm In arm together not; them at cAsrcA
oyss Mr. aillsp.ush was smember Of the arm q Ter
Gloss exaIDnedI had brother who was srnember Of
ue bari he is row dead he took his meals at tho Bond
street House; be quite intimate with Mr. ana Nh
MNspsugh don't know how long prior to his death TIE
isluasv existed; don't know Of any special aAectios
existing between Mr.. Nlispaash and my brother;
don't snow of any rings having been taken from bio
fingers sfier he died which hsd been gives
q tbs pisinuTs wife hasing given your BIO.
ther ring or nngss A. do not. d Do ysa
Ionged tnm; present on several occasions wher
my brother was in company with Mr. Mlnspaugh and
her husband @ Did you not return 70 Mrs Mispaugh
some rings which sho had given TO your brother ana
what did she say ut the tnis2
br Fullerton objected she question tho ground
that il was not pertinent 10 the issue.
Mr. CIinton-we claim that Mrs. Mllspaugii was badly
treated by her husband and that whon she received
these Rugs she rnae remark TO the witness to that
or affection existed between Ne and Mr. allspaugh y
the time OF the alleged seductioe
The Court sustained the objsc OF the plaintiffs
counsel
@ Did you get Mrs Mispaugh's likeness from your
brothers afe and return il 70 horf A. dor recoilet
O. Did you return 10 her lock OF hair which you found
In your brosher's safo' 4 did the hair wa1lko Mm
Milspaoghs my brother died in this city; M and Mn
Aispaagh sat up with him.
Judge Leonard said he could divine the motive II
the counsel in this course of examination.
q. Did your brother die very suddenly A He did
q Was e not aione during his last lncssf A. believe
Q During his last illness was Mrs Mispaught
A. She q When you arrived there was she IN Al
tendance upon hinS A. do not recollect
Re direct.Q When you saw Mr. and Mrs MllepangA
friendly otherwses tobjected to; objection over.
rulcd-l A Ther relations were clonate Q HAD
togetherY A. had rot
everal OCCASIONS recollect taking of his boog be
he was too drunk TO do IL himself have seen him
under the influence of suo but he knew what he WIS
about O. Did he seem 10 be very much under the nHu-
OF liquor? A. He felt pretty good. q Don't yos
know that Mr. Millspangh in the habit OF drinking 70
exccssS A. do not; he was In the habit Of drinking
occasionally; three or four times evening probably;
have known him not to drink anything for three mouths
at a time.
Re direct--Mr Mllspaugh was very domestic man;
always foand him at home whsui called In the evening
Cross examined-Wasa at Hoboken With Dir. MllapandA
once but did consider has he drunk on that %
eas0n; heTnereiy felt merry.
NRs RNoLrsH's TESTIMONY.
Sarah English deposcd n at No Caroa
place, Blocker street; knew Andrew Mlispengh was
Knew s seS
Milspaugh together; saw them in broadway togcther;
saw nm cross over ne street ana meet her they wakes
up Broadway together. saw theCa on Broadway On
another occasion -
OCCASIONS, soon after they wore married; could
not say how long time elapsed between the visits; !
WIN NJ. nsS sse
have know Mr. Mispaush for aboulfourteen years.
MRS. AILLsrAUGn's ANrxcEDBNrs.
nue.; knew Mr.. and Mrs. Miispaush; know them since
1858; became acquainted with them,through cousin
% them e he
Bond Street House subsequently, my visits there were
Sasa suHs M sseac. ss:
good deal OF Mr. and Mrs Millspaugh they were uni
formIy kind and afectionac 70 each other.
Cross xamined-Mr. and Mrs Mspaugh called q
my house In December 1891 cant say how many
Nmes saw Adams in Mrs hispangh's room have seen
Mr.. Mspangh there and when be vas absent; could
not that observed any token Of aaeoiioa betwsse
Mr. and Mrs Millspaugh nevor know OF his throwing
her chair Or Of his insulting her before company
Mrs Mispaugh the adopted daughter Of Mrs AGbosS
the celebrated actress father wasons of she exeou.
tors Of Mrs Abbotts estate
WHAT WAITER saw.
Thomas Brown testified that for ten yearA and ha4
he waiter tho Bond Street House; KIN NJ.
Adams and Mr. and Mrs. Mllspaugh; Mr.. Ada and
Mrs Mlspaugh generally to their meals to scther;
MIR Nispaugh generally breakfastsd NJ seven half
past ocock Mr. Adams and Mrs. Mllspau sh camo
down about nine or ten o'clock; Mr. adams and Mills
paugh used 10 sit together Mr. Adams 10 % habit Of
having wine and Mrs Mispaugh ~e nd partakef dont
know where they Joined company the dining
have Frequently then going N the houss
together after breakfast in summer, Mrs Milspsugh
used go the country, aud Mr. Adams ,eraly dis
appeared about the tim hs always away when
Ars Mspaugh was absent, and returned Wit her;
saw anything improper between them
Cross examined-Mr. Wllspasgh sci dom present
Mt the regular dinner hour VIII oh Ave O'Clock; he
generally came late; Adams Mrs Millspaugh,
and Mr. Mnspaugh the other side lxnew OF MIRA
Mspaugh having been out II the city than twice:
this was in the summer OF 1891
Ia