, 1865-11-09

LAW IETELLICENCE,

uSI1kp SIAfEs CoUHf-bt}oft JWJ< D57tUs-
naond.-1hae were no cases Of importance before
this Court yesteEd1y.
In the euit OF ejectmcnt brought By E. hathaway
against W. WIsswell, The jury returned verdict
for plaintiff.
SuFEa1on CouR7-Btfore Jwt1t Jostph T. Gary.
The proceedincs tp this Court yestcrdny were Of
m uninte4estins natme, being confined 10 csses oil
slight importance.
James M. Lowe brings suit In covenant ". Ed
mnnd >. Hodges. for the use Of Murray +. Taley.
pe1r Wcse flied.
Matthias Coseman, Anthoay Schiller and Samuel
Sem, Of lhe drm OF Schiller, cossman 4 Co. bring
T. Lee Of the inn Of Lee j. Brother, to recover the
eum Of go 50 for iron easunc1, alleged 10 have
been furnished and sold to the drm Of Lee Bro
t0chmcnt was issued In ibis Bnlt against Tho proper
~ Of Lee + Brother, upon the asidAvit OF Maihtas
Gossp1 ~ wh,sh esses tnss Janes L. Of he
State. with Tho Intention Of having his effects NJ
This cont vas = sese!on yesierday morning. no
business Of public Importance was transacted
An attachment Was issued against the property Of
who alleges that the defendant Is Justly indebted 10
him In the sum Of <l50 for professional services as
an attorney al law, IN two cha1ccfy suits DOW pend
against raid DAVIS IL which be alleges 10 hare been
retained at the instance Of the defendant, and for
Adgicc and counsel at various times.
The attachment Wts issued upon the alleged
ground that the defendant i non.rcsident-
Who alleges tha' e ls !he duly appointed admins,
e1h OF February, 1851 widow Of Samuel Ellis, wh3
died on the ah Of Oetohes, 1853, having large
landed eata1e, IN the cty Of Chicago IN which she
Lsdis Eli, Joined Win he hetrs st Ian Of her Dc,
Jo9ss ! c., 'l.en eonsisttns q " Y; i. osdsn,
manage. se, md convey W my of Ii lie lands il whieh
she was fnteres Ted. IL Cook County: and executed
apoWes OF attorney 10 the firm Of Ogden. Jones s
se Of hen 70 sae fass al
1. Rrckes, chargce the defendants 10 be guilty OF
gose breach Of the trust repoeed in them, and Of
aion donEs md .fssa IT, ,S eaq
plainant. The plainutf prays inst the Court may
GEann, hm @ wa.tss @ RELIEF nay b. IN accordance
I.EcoEpER's CoCRr-RtfoTs JUdge z Fan D4rea.
This Court ssss oeenpsed he greater part e. q me
Gay in hearing suit In Which The CITY g Chicago
name Of Dnhy. who found his way 10 the Police
Cont, sometime ffnce, on charge OF d1sopdef!y
conduct, and Of having assaulted poilce officer In
the discharge OF bis duty. Duffy preferred having
biz afars settled By court Of more exalted ju1is-
dittfon Than that At the Armorr. The jury returned
d sta1cd verdict
business Of anJ importance WIS transacted En this
--
PEu LAnc1S1ks.-Fredctick Seheuer, dis
a,.s;.sa ,,cfo4 5n.,ir. s,r-tsrsnt ~, ,ts ch.r,e
msn.a 'e,os 1us.e as " 45e
oi hteens. fAraaea occurring omcss IN 4sesho!o
Block, have been In the habit Of us1nE certain
room In The garrett for the ttotagc Of odds and ends
for which they had no particular nse and Seheuer+
WIS alleged, has been in the habit Of taking these
things away n fass as they were placed there: A
Drrnber Of witnesses were examined, but nothing
positive Was addueed, aud the eharz,e Was CHANGED
10 disorderiy conduct, md the defendant tined $50
and costs.
little woman, residing On Fourteenth near State
street. wsa yesterday morning aHaiened before jus
nee Moore, at the instance Or John Hnduef.
nsashboT on tne ehatge OF etea!inG eaDoaGsa. T. me
nau ~. nais 1has ~ s.~