The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1865-11-25
tcoptlnued from the rirgt ragcl

eoveles are tept in tho back ground 10 consequence
sIv YonK CRcUs.-This benutiul ,,tatlshment
IN i4th street, opposite the Academy Of Music. st
continues 70 draw IL. ero-d, II i, certainly place
IN which hour eau BE- very pleasantly ps''ed.
INV NATIONAL Ctacrs, 81 A~D 20 BowrRY.-
Montpelier ~ vi,e vhen h. droppcd tie Opera"
end took up the ~Circu," It pay, better, and 10
decidedly success. Mr.. John Lowior !, splendid
clown. Matinee at o'clock to-day.
THE COURTS.
Tnr srro-o Dryoaos CAsE-OrESiNa ADpRrss ov
PLAmrpT's CoUSsTt,-l STERgsTirG DfsoLosrREs.-
The trial Of the case Of Il. p. strong sei Mary v.
s.rous, y. commenced In the superior Court yes
tsrdsy, before judge Garvin. The Judge
promptly present II O'Clock, tho time tor oponins
The Court and the Court. room presented a crowded
sp,<arsnee the audience being Of married respeot-
ability. eouie delay occnsionei, owing to the
sb-eDee q Of the jurors and In the meantime the
crowd In the room received continual aoceson,, I'M
eli s,andins room even wanting. within the her
the same array q counsel we're seen A. YESTERDAY,
the plaintiff being present. and the father Of tho de-
PENDANT sitting by her counsel.
There are fourteen issues Ia this ea,o, upon Which
the jury have 10 pas, the substance Of which arc -
H., the defendant in ihi. cs,e since her marriage
With plaintiff, committed adultery Al various ttated
pisiniig in hi. seton Hs. ne y.Iniii zinc. DE
knowledge Of the fact Of such adutefI iofriyen tho
same BY actual oohahitauon With dticndAnt Ild
ne plsiDtih himself commlt adultry rith one ~ ca
y Potter, on various occasions, {. stated in the de
fcnee ALLEGED by the defendant
The jury having appeared, Mr.. Cram commenced
OPENING lppRgss ron rtAtSTiFy.
He said the pariie- on record we're husband and
~ife the real suito however on one eide, -"fe two
ut.s ebiden' Ssa so,o I'm, ~ a., iop in.
Tics; for these iue girls he came into Court In no
- A.enu a dau q
idsnt Of the Bank Of Commerce, iamiy octupyihs
.hish ,oeaI Io.lton, and noted lot ,es .'l,,t one
'on, in Court, With -hon The Jury -ould become
more particularly scquainted before the end Of tho
vanlAss In 1858 tho fri child va born, and in
1850 tho couple visited EuroPe .he there the vie
defendant went TO live b. mutual inclination, vi
defendants mother, Who -m widow, and no trt
dssired 10 live with her. Thore they found bdw,d
r. s,rOps' sho h.d turned b.. shSash- ng.'es
oetw.rdiy dsvoa., The defendant q,ed 20 JOY
him In iis relsiou. duties and -h.a EdNnd
the house Of Mr.. strong scene OF domestic hap;
piness who would have dfeat that In this petoeful
AMI and idward sssSd and lode .ose her shey
cultivated each othen' society, aud were happy, a.
b.. eon' believed IN The affection TIA, ,hona snn,
iniimanyf No, no; be did not; II no had, no would
have been a. they. No man sver did, and he trusted
In God no man ever would, suspect his own brother
Of dirhonorins him. This wrongful intimacy tn.
crime, was commenced In the spIins Of 1850, and
day, Of 1851. About this time she became cold and
indifferent to her husband, and an estransement
1863, little Edith one Of tho little children died on
the 4h abe vas buried on the evening oil NE ON
book the duty we owed 70 our fellow cfesInros Mr
Strong, drawing his chair close 10 his wfe SAID that
sseS other than tb.y bad done Rsieioioe The -lio
eups herseif at his ieet and eiayed iosiyone,s for
her neglect lie told hsr to let the effort OF the fu'ufe
retrieve the pas. Her sgitatoD at this condu,
g, o., became sres.sr and sTesisr on forgive me-
have been. you would separate from me forever"
The wife confessod all, aud the husband eli mUtti-
ded and sshsmed, aud from that day to this he had
never lived in The same apartment with his vie he
took house a. lshp l.. l. lived alone, secluded from
defendant went 10 her father re house and the plain
~ vent to live with bis mother. In the Fan Of
1908 Mr.. Strong took away one of the children
from her husband, and refused to let him have 1t
Ssin. Up 70 tho Fall OF 1858, John Austin stevens
-ss kept in the dark but as soon as he know IL bo
became her AGENT and nsigated the means Of attsck
and defence. FOR the other members OF the family
John Austin was hold up to fepIoach and aninad-
version, he would only nave himself to blame. hr
ttrong then commenced suit Tor the Gecoyory Of his
child and also one Tor divorce 10 the latter suit,
h. strong puts In an answer mot under oath, and
claimed that even II the complaint were true plaintiff
had ogiven her. Her defence rns 'you can't Prove
my guilt hu, y you can lou have iorslyen me"
70 set Possession OF the child then vi her. ON the
setvlca OF the writ the defendant fled vItn The child
anu mas Iemhned fugitive ever since; And ye, enc
inGly anu serene, with degree OF audsciIy, confess
Ing with the insoence Of crime shat she had stolen
the subject matter Of the suit and yet she WAS an
innocent woman. The counsel then went into The
facts OF the abortion case with which the public
well acquainted; sio detailing the various slep, taken
V procure the ALLEGED doubIiui witnes.e. by Jonn
Austin stevens who swssr TO an ailese ed adu terry
With Mrs Potter on the part OF Mr. Strong TACT that
never e1stel, and which is sworn to b, Nv DANGER
Gus vagabonds by the name Of Massey and Mr.. Dr.
" Alth, whose husband lOuTueyman pIiufOr-
M i. TN,
stevens got hold OF these peope; he found out that
Mrs. ash had bren acctssoiy 10 murder alter tie
tact; be Influenced terror heg, money over the
h.teys anu when this case was nearly reached,
sfhdavs were put IN that Nj. STRONG had commit ed
sdultsry with airs. POI ei one year before be knew
Of had seen her The Musseys and " Glsh had MOL
70 ahdAvis that NJ. Potter hal cau,od the deaf Of
shs Adams. b' procuring ala abO. uol, they made
ths thsrte IN oTdei TO eompe. MIS- 10 ttI, unGtf
nar Of punishment, to HppeaI ~ a witness a. siust
Nj strong. Al these means were Lakeu to drive
aelehdAnt irofn contiuuns Ihe prosecution, but he
thild en-, anu II he could not Uphold th Sc only By
sip,uIe, he dstermiAed that the elpOsule should
come.
Nj. Cram concluded his remarks at a quarter he
tore thee thus occupying two hours aud thee
quarters IN HE addres. The Court then adjourned
'he 'n'l until Monday morning at lam.
FRAME NJ CTIES" ~ CoURI-rhc cas-. Of
Henry stevenson agt. the AiN aukee and Prairie du
Ch'sn Railroad Company, came up in the sup.eme
CouIt yesicIiAy n motion made by thu Company
70 uerOlNt an Injunction aimed al SPECIAL e. M
acsuAInlns them hom s,uing their common stock
TUG INJUNCTION Nss originally al. aiued on Ii
gouhd ihat under their charter this wou ,
be ylO,atOu q the LIGHT OF ,hs ounrI
OF pIeleIIed stock the holders of mortgn, a
np,l ,h ins S"alA,s r H.'sPp r.. On h
common stock Il. ing hiEher IN price nan ths %, 4.
feiled etocA, Tue dirtctosNert eutc 10 to IN Ina
81 would De more AdNuutaleOus to all pAItip,. nm,
that the coult had oh auea proper ulirirpo,
oyeI tue alton, anu on ihtse and oIher .ounds asa