, 1865-12-30
The Crosby Assignment---Importaat
Attachment Suit--Desertion
and Nyorce...Homeste
s.<1he Detroit Pfre--.
More Suits.
Important UseIsion Of Judge Bradwel1
in Relation 10 a Disputed Ff1l.

and report and yesterday, IN pursuance OF the con
hrmation q thts report, a decree Of divorce VII
Balzar ct u. -, Newbeesger ct Al. chancery.
This was suit which has been On trial some days
her, e1ecutrix and sole legatec of Hugo Newberge1
deceased, to obtain award Us homestead right In
the property described Is the west hall Of lot four
decree Nas yesterday ordered BY The court to be en-
tered awarding complainant 81 600 out Of the funds
ct NJ. THIS was action tho casa instituted By
Henry ]. Ewing and Others, against the American
Express Company, the Me!Ghants' Dispatch Com
1Jatieraeld 70 reeostr damages eiaimed ii Ssooo.
Iho suit is bronght to recover for losses sustained
at the Detroit 1re In October last
neioa PSope o4 81 % a s as11 ts; n ss 5 70
William @. Martin 10 obtain his ro1easc ftom tho
County Jail, where he WIS committed on the o6th
Instant for the alleged larceny Of a muG. Tho Wit
Bcnsfey vs. Goldsmith. In this case rcrdtc.
Was returned foE The complainant, and damages
.kruegar ys. Velicnzcr. Action On the case 70,
s1ander. On Trial.
Joserh u: Dake vs. Monroe C. Sherman. Action
Jeseph s, Dake ". Robe1t L. couatiss. @ Is i Iction
On the @ case Tor assault and battery. Damases laid
~ josspb N. Date VI. wu1t,m little Actin, ~, n,
case for SANDER. Damages laid At $1,000. '
The above three suits are another result OF The
somewhat slippery butter transaction Of George E.
The following is the trial calendar for to-day, II
The case nor on trial he concluded:
1a2- Winter rs. Ru1ie.
1a3. Gillespie rs. Mcclure ct al.
III. GEecnbaum ys, Eame.
IL HaeF Ss. same.
III Duaton Es. TrusEe1l
128. Same ~. Anderson.
~ Same sf- nint!s-
100. Same ". Nellfs.
~ 80 ptat., naate y. - peHo'4m: ~ w. :4>,,,
pai} 5Gcoa &c E{1uhTI;bgo5e T.; Ao,; =. l1aianu-
III ss. o1ult4: iats was an acnon on INC case IN
snd stt J., U anon3s - nau atsa1nsl Aosanam ~, =.
IN, eo r. sso!et M aauases elained a. Sl0,O0o for
sege Wese e 'he p'sse'pe 'oF Summons 10 papers
osa1etn as ssha Aesumps3t 70 feeoser damages
n fo1 aAcfca losses incurred b5 grain Transaction
a The snI o]outo, e,zes co,st,,n,e t,. c,,,
g.? ~ Il. 2. u, =, a. 76 =, IS = 50, 81: g., %.
RkGonnEh.s CoUnr-.A9fors lion. E. Fan BIZ
nn 70 aSe Of IT,
aFy . iefm. c. n.x,- - , -
tocSIf CoutsTIn;1ofs 713i3 Aon. !. r. nfddacSA.-
Estase H. , ?. 'dan e. Niiaams; deceased The follow.
6; s = H. H. 5a ass
he aa II 1s OF another
Tic names q question - by reque.. withheld
tn r ~ ..a h1te aec1a1on
an3 .sW TT 'espeetlse's W 'ne 1e1tefs "a
az L. ". B1a,ehford, executor, offers for probate
ra9Tl 1n ee y 1E WI o. tne deceased. a.
ts1b;n S,,as 49, eSors thee n III IL nc san
executed and Witnessed IN proper manne5 m @ untcy n9
ttn,o ~ IT, npPta1s idat n ne
fn1iovtn" c1sns. Has IN T. !. Eau1+ ur %Hi tne
nv sseeu,et a1e to invest IL hoasana o1aee Ilee'
" ncs yeT Ell om ae a. ny Z y either
ps boz q nn nsf; .s wf e sssa s By % ( S md
I'D 1t deccase said Investment, Or Tic proceeds d
ne eame @ t% 1ess5t t9 tbs estate" On h back Of
decreased: EhicaSo, july II, 1SH3.-A having de-
cessed June =, fst' li.aye erased As name il the
toxsgo!ng and e16stitutsd II thai Of and direct
"JouA G. W1LMa,tss' fseal. !
The wil, y now presented, has The narae Of B =
deceased. 1t the TING Of making the last writing,
knowing Ct the death Of 4, erased bes name, and
Inserted @ ihat Of Instead in hs own handwriting,
IT cannot De seen a. alk iu the will
.s 1T 81 sta.n,e o. VILE ses l provides that no will
ETH. It'll oe revoked ofnesWlse than BY burning. can
anesl o. u ns ptesenes By his direction
" SSnsGn. oI py e9ule 9tact WILL Testament, or
H. ~ ~ q e. nc ZANE signed BY
r nose Witnesses ana " Mem attested tn bis or her
a9nui ~, w Testament sodte e yrtinS
1sa M & Ell Q, stse operate 10 revoke any portion OF
~ ~ WI, an4 not paS H!nessea as provided BY
~ @ y nola. a1u Inc sald L. not known in
~ mu- q WIZ nl1y II taFnReu gy burning, can
I'LL. se.suG1 ~ 5s,,. .s, y opeaa!n2 inc same
setJ eslaent taat tne etasHfe WIS nor made by the
LSs,ainI VIII lne 'ntention OF fefoktuR The whole
w, out on!y tne ioaltn clause. lhr ant11uS r.
fof9s wntcn e5istcd as TO thla elau5c did not re-
wa. soAs hae nnoa las1un'eats Ne rma1nder the tes-
ta!ol nIenued 10 stand.
noN becomes necessary 10 consider whether,
nnces puS eMtu1c. portion Of q ,:1ll can BE- re-
sokeo p Gashte, and tne remaining portion ad-
MiI,ed t9 pfooale N lna county Court: Sir John
N1enoi, IN sefnny ss. EoFdham, add. Il, said
ILL pgson r. o. soan1 mind vas about to rcyoke
leEacy, nc wouid probably ease i. Or strike bis
pen niouEn+ OF alaW Hnes aIoss It aad u . per-
son o. only otnnafy caution, he would note the
iesceau9n ~ lna Margin accompanied with its
WIZ, ano aalaeaucae4 ~ ~ slsnatutc q bis IN
LIME; LINE; ana agaan, n nilhnshast Ss- Viekes5,
fhlthm. 10, he eaid: II pronounce, therefore,
ane Eist paft of H.; n WOOD se. Wood, Fhilltn.
sst tne JnaGe WIN MS own hand, struck out apoE-
uon Ihat nan peen %satten since the death Of The
testalot ana admitted ne viii 70 probate. A por-
uoa =. VIII 1nay 0e cIs o1t Win tde Intention Of
IesoSlns. snd the balance admitted to probate.
LaW' sso: Cultis', M: 2 ID, $50 and
SIS ! Jarnain> a11+ Loma1, IN his able
s M9rk On E1etuuons> page Ill, aaye:
met may pc a partial revocation by cancellIng
OF fooNte1at1nS pafhcutaf clause or part Of the
VIII, aHd 1nat particular ctuse or pa1t only will be
reseked, sas1ng ne rest OF The testament to have
!ts iegsl saeet; md tie revocation Ia complete, If
an intention that the shall not stand;' as in
the case 1uEt eiatcd, where the tcstator drew his
pen across the deyiseets name. Our statute il re-
Eaid 10 me revolving Of Wills differs from the Eng