New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1865-04-29
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPERIOR COURT-TRnL TERA-APRrL &.-Bei'Fe
Justice BARBOUR.
PRACTICE AND ILEADIhG.

SUPERIOR COURT-TEnL TERa-APRfL 2.-beisFe
Justice BARBOUR
PRACTICE AND PLEADING.
William l.. Seymour agt. Edwin D. Brown. Inc
antiI sviug recovered judgment ssans, coal company
ron prlu..ory note under the seal Of the Company sne
doenisn. trsise under the statute making rn'tes lu
certain rs. per.onay iaur. The defendant adnted th'
naAnr 0f tie note but oaeTed IN defense tie OWING laos
That IN. trustee of the Company, whose mines are neai
Cta.t,oo,, d. arf large Investment been driven away
the mines By tha Rebels a, The beginning o. ne war
h~f,f. .,idnf any hing That Nr. seymour had been
kcarer AMI had claims az lt the wo.kmen Ia The mines
that the alleged note me1oracum Of he mo4rl' dHe
I % he r, oulg when the war cease, and the Company
-esn 10 ea1e o ter property. aud that TIE opany ao
y. - - nj % tie Sourt he'd tbat Under ,he "a
siou II tie m ing OF tas note neither Il the det'es
Of ders, ersty conditional de ~ ~ 81 ne
co1d D, shown but allowed juror to De "tAd Hh On
taycut costs for the puos" OF alowing motion 10 be
made at 5pec.ll Term ioi eIi,ni VI the aAs"ef
smith Wo'd.nsn Tor tie pl'irtf
Before Justice & EvIs.
ms lAS L 70 lICIEs-AyERAGE
David NaueustoiA and another agt The Column
81 ns.rsuceC The plaintiffs bal de a. insurance OF
s co. apo. wool ,rd coe bosrd tie ship Mortimer
Livingston om HAVE ~ tLls Icft. Jhc Ni Wa wfteAed
oh the Crs Of tho Delaware md he hgh i-s n ing over
r Bonn. tlai oss. r. wool md t1 cog. Of coffee w,ro
d. s,n out tv tie wrcck.r In damaged condition. Ihr
,ri,rs Il Wa sid were employed By The % nsTs but
oe out ani Of them bourh bag or ana AZ
tended The roGgug Of tbe saved cote the most g 1t hay
Ter. n,cted With IT, The SOD cote, were brought to
NoIo.k .hers tie wool wa saM f1r Few hundred dol
which the Company otter 20 pay The coffee brought - over
expenses. not enough 20 pay tue tre~l Rom lf
Def.ws-- The company claim that the iuaalirce bring
free rsIncu oyeuse cad pfst Of tue coAee lsTas
saved IA specie, they are guf liable.
TIE l question. pr .Htsd whether he X or ne
c.d~e wool were udyh' chs The Cont nr'ltise,
and etnsr tie sk be us scp-' llc whether toe Gee
r damaged ty the res = he 20 be n tie place Of
srccs worthless Dad total oss in connection with q
lion. WHO TIE rarr, who employed tie wrr-h
et. bi0ucht tts dee ~ ht~-NorG and a was the
Motive IL 90 dolrg whether 70 save tie snfanc company
be- tho cts 90 Only p'nil. to gain tie vre .k
Yer ccntese possible az 70 iuA tA- duties Il
the ~. pow nor AK e.ru thln their 'tti-ht
At tie request OF plaintiff counsel these points were re-
ducrd Questions md paced s.cy by TIE Jury who
found ca G ~ thea IN a the raiHt4 end also fonrd
Tor thr iu snoIat 81 tAc.s ess, amounting With IN
{, rc.t 20 81 q, ll1 10
& OCon.r ~ plaintiffs; Mr. morri. for defendants.
sPEci1L TaHA--APkIL -8pffoe Chio! Justice RoBERrsoS
DE lsIONs.
Patrick Bird act. John Carey O. al.-COmplnjft
ul.-lised win cosJa.Iea Ladds sr Bryun Cohaor &C
~ .'iou efIned sud Join !. Cadwasi'r esq Eppou
q cr.rg-Morner i4sng'fon -. Marshal q. Eolerts-
No o. yscat- judgment sIsned.Ihe Board 81 Nlti
Commissioner. ct. Henry A. Buu-Moton grlnted.sussn
( b AT asL Robert McllIicy, Ne.-Mo,1u denied