, 1865-11-20
LAW HNTELLEGENCE.

UNITED 1IATEd CGER1-Bg0fE yHdJf UytEn
noad,-Ibe snit OF Smith Co., brought In as
sumpstt. IS. Buchanan L Co., to recover damages
laid at $500 On conuact to tu1nith gs1ln. WINS no,
concluded when the Court Adjourned The present
statement OF iacte appears 70 show that Smith i
Co.. grain dealers, OF Quincy, Ind, employe1
Messzs. Burkham hayes AZ their agents here fos
the purchase Of wheat They directed the1r agents
to purchase below fl-30, but wheat did not come
down 10 that point Subsequently, they rcnt by
telegraph m order to purchase at $IsS, but before
that order received 1t had gone up 10 flS8 and
&1-39- This suit Is nnw brought to recover :hc
difference between ff.sa and the price they had 10
pay to m "shor" contract
,sGrEa1os corM;-15ers Ju'ge 1o.<qa E
mcans N unimpoFtaut one, Including number ol
murder cascs. md crimes mneh daskes than the
ordinary dye Of fczimlnalify, win be commenced On
Monday; many criminals are to BE- ts4ed who hare
snncet.ded In acquiring notottety not always at
tsined BY plmps and p'cEpockets.
Ihe otde. q proceedings u stvn cases wilnot
but viii proceed as usnal: before Judge James on,
,h wit q Espley1n wa issued upen the saadasit
year. old, and a number Of faEntne 1mnl .ments
vi ucd At S25, The plaintiff alleges that he Is the
owner o. and Justly entitled to the Immediate pos
session Of said goods, which are now In the poe-
session Of one Thomas Eldridge, who, It Ia alleged
unlAwfully took nnd now unlaWfhtlJ detalna The
.sme L. Mther nfleged, That said goods were no!
tsshmeui TO which ,he said goods were liable.
lawrence y. Lynch brings suit In -.sumpsit -.
On common coCnte.
A attachment was issued against the property Of
81 nSsIt a'. gpSs1 e., ,s e. sd.Sit ei Bfn
Bowen BrotheEs. Of the nty Of Chica-o, which
cousits Of J: Il BduEn+ g. =. Bowen, CT. Bowen
9nd K. %hitma9: It + further alleged that said
Rubart s Justly indebted to said firm tn the snm Of
ft,000 foe goods, wsrcs and merchandise sold and
delivered BY The plaintiffs to the defendant at his
spetaal instance and request The wit i.sued on
from this State and cunceals himself 10 that The
process not b served and that he has disposed
ofhis property In order TO hinder and delay his
Fredenck 4. Howe e.. a. brinRa suit IN atsnmpait
". Hmm Niles and William >. Blewster, In Plies
Of trespass On The case upon promises. Damages
asd 1@; Esseptins F.. the summons
Quimby / Co, bring suit in assnmpsit, IN p1es
q q he IN M ot gm bse r. Biz 81.
lions. no papers wers dlea. ' ''~ 49, 1N''
,;g sH sse cGssR8nf 8s,,1 ,,gs aSs s;sr $ e, .. :,
The fm Of BentleJ& Green of Chicago, bring suit
In aaeun1rs. = ne: e On the case upon
promises e.. John Korzey. Michael Bou1ke 4 a, 10
delivered By lie pl Ins % tbe defendants 1t their
Epecial Instance and request
wilt Of rcplcFtn was Issued upon the affidavit Of
Michael Mclaughlin to recoyer hack, Or carriage,
valued ut $500. The plaintiff alleges thai he u The
owner Of and Justly entitled to The possession Of
said property, which Ie nox IN the possession Of
EuGene Ford, who, 1t IS alleged, unlawfQlly took
md now unlawtnly dctains the came. 1t is fnrther
alleged that eafd property WAS not taken for any
tar stsessmeut, or fine levied by virtue Of any Law
or the State. Or on any execution attachment to
which The property Of the plaintiff was lIsb1e.
This Court TAs In session On SATURDAY.. but no
bus1uese Of public importance was trsasscied
REcoRpEEss CoUR1-Ddore Jm5ge E. rlr4 Buven
-Was not tn eession On Saturday. having adjourned
On Friday till Monday at 10 O'Clock.