, 1865-02-21

from interest and rents, and applicable TO the paJ"
Accepted and ordered published.
The City Attorney reported ths following llst
Of suits osposed sines !9>y lsss he DE Sf
the VARIOUS courts In the city.
Gi1tJ in 0. S. Circuit Court
Geo. J; stow " City q Chicago; Il e5eet'nsnt;
dismissed 4 plaintiff = eost9 Jss; 1so5: aceu.
g GR,ssga : weoSbulg tan 3ell Into N
ton, on the corner q Wells snd South WateE s.
street. Hefned the city IN the cook County Coast
he city for {i5o.o0 and costs. Ise aty then sued
kilcn ROBBINS, the contractor, foE indemnify n
the Cook County coust q Common tsas' fit Wa1Sh
Court On motion Of the defendant where the cause
VA nie1, md the Jury disnlssed., Another ti,l
bad. and verdlet Of not En,l5y s secured. th
taken to The U. S. Supreme Court In 1856, the
Judgment Of the court below YES reversed On
1 20 IT, ns N
Sal,s51. The cause was taken to the o. s.. Sn.
preme Court again, this time by defendant, whess
Il: s.@oe, nue. pNsah pNshesoa Is, City Of Chicago. smt
dismissed ut plaintiffs cost Nor: 2, 1854.
Goodrich 4 xD5ew rs. City Of Chicago, decided
pesied s to he {. s. Supreme Cont, where it Is
now pending.
SUITS Ii THE SUPERIOR courT.
Jaues q. Rees r.. The City of Chicago. eject
the The nor,h ED ot lot S, block :, ofeina, town Of
Chicago. In this cause there have been TWO ver-
diets. one for plaintiff nnd one for defendants.
Benz. F. noddock r. The City oi Chicago, a.
eumpsit, to recover $150, on m assortment for
w,d*mnF Taylor etreet o. Dec =, lsn : }nag-
thr sait y.as dismissed at plsin.id'e cosie.s
City Of chic,go IS Owen Mccarthy It al, debt
! on bond Of 0"en Mecarthy, City Collector for
ehsreed 1s IL rom iia6lty % ,he bona 81 ss.ue
ncnt made between S. D. Wand. City Comptroller,
and Mccsrthy, alter The expiration Of Aecart1y'a
plaintiff claimed that 1t was made by mistake. In
January, 1864. Indictment was obtained aeainst dc.
ney ; aivised the CITY Comptroller TO release No
css2 asa aSs 81 o cEse e
tamacc. ior alleged wrongful revocation oi plain
tih's license as . h.ckman: SUIT dismissed at
Uirich Lochhc1lcr Is. City Of chiespo. Aasump-
mr. mrnt for p1nintif, $500
| Company, eppesls. These suits were brought In
1850. by Walker, Van Artnan y Dexter. Dis
| missed 1t tdesendant'e sosta-
| cLicBgo. snit dizmiEsed By agreement each par
r. to INV thc,r own costs This was an action on
ihc case tor digging np 1ots A. q ans q II bios5
on them was removed when Tue EiEer wa widcned
and decpeped. Controversy settled by neeoda-
| uon. o h,s.,.. ,,a
1r76 lie ity Of Chicago e. John S. Wa'lsce. Ap-
| peal Defendant fned in Police Court ana ap-
James Bryaut u. eatne. Assumpsit for use md
,,rcr,stjon of lot j. block +, Fort Dearborn Add.
to Chicsso. suit dismissed Sept, 1864. at plain
lie city Of chiesgo q. Sylvester Lind, Robert st
| H. Fross, A. ". leaid md B. F. Caryer: Debt
$i00c00 Damages, SO @ Suit On % ofiasl ~ ge9a 9oss
sri. ana verdict sor plaintiff for $10l0oa debt to
be discbar. cd on payment Of 81, ,9l1. 81. NeFem,
l,er IS, 1s6s. mo1ion for new tEial oTeft9!ed ana
Go1rt and Judgment 81 the Superior Court re-
The Gig Of Chicago =. B. G. Ryder. Appeal,
o'suse same e. 4. Latin Appeal: so,t for y1olstea
of nr5fnancc concerning sidewalks In refusing to
1s,se Sidewalk to Crade. SnIt dismissed, deien-
dsnt aayl9E q YEs5ic ssEeTS Wofls d sonp'' "D l
o Same - r.. jncop Roe.,, appeal, Judgment for
| plaintiff for costs. ,. ,r.,,x
in he csse lor ipjpres to plaintiff IN filling into
an c1eavs1on in The sidewalk aa}eeent, , e ,,1 ,1e
premises Of Chas. Ulicb, corner Of NORM Ciais =
pna S1x SSG1n WsteT I ssfes seted viii plain
tilt Suit dtmlssed at plaintiffs costs p areo'
mtnt., cir of Chicago =. Daniel WoEthtngton;; a;
i9r oihstrnct,nR is sidewalk. sui oast0a7Seo -
same -. Matt Walsh. p1sorderly conduct
| Sn1 0sefrlssGu On payment Of costs oy dcieuuan@
Marin O. Walker Is. Solomon Mckichan. a.
ehmp,st iof hc use and occupation BY defendant @
eI wre the owner Of lot s, in block 3, Fort Dear
noIn Atihasitl3n. tis an! az eueh owner clstmed the
fendant Suit smissed at niaint;f,a H1H - enss ~
: The C1ty Of Chicago "a. Joseph n. Iathrop, fol
rtofnttnn Of The ordinance crncerutnc nsh fnspec
t1on. In December, 1869, trini 81 court and yer
. dict for defendant, the eonrt holding that Ii.
plaintiff filled TO provide die .osluou ot The dat
E within meaning OF the ordinance,
4 Same ~. Same. Same decision.