, 1865-08-22
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
Alleged Fraud.-SuIt Against the Ctty-.
UonrdiAE House In the Courts--
TnIes md Dcltnqucn1s.

C1ncC1T Coun1.-Belore Judge wIlliams.-A
writ Of cmpiaE ad rcspondcndum Was Issued upon
". -, ~ ~ - ..1n.. I1aaN - ..e ease y. ieu-
eFack non'naa asanst nent! Meeson. Fiain1in
sued to recover camaeos Ind al sS undsr the FOL-
tbe present month. the defendant vas bofses.rd AZ
thc lease Of bacl ,ooms and store nj No 81 sontI.
~ 49, ~. ~ .seo Seu1a s
whcre he had stock and fixtures for cn1ytng on
ss Is .1ieoes IN b.sr so,a IN cohn,,n.nt ~ ~.oo
undtr sns ff.ailcn, ptctepeo lint he landlord had
consent had rot been given, nor could be obtained.
nos H Tue n .ana,S.a . a.,Sw nosa f % oeeupy e
pse1nk e.. Upon the ground oi Haud Complainant
based his application Tor The capias.
c6sr7es G. Iiser 10 rseo,er possesson - ot ary
a cae snce saa eSc orE.e hne:s apa nGS
vrossinils ~ ae detaned b de;sgaant " neS ann
Al altachmtnt was issued aEatnst James Dull and
James GoNan, The lake tunnel contractors, upon
the affidavit Of Levi ]. cobnrn and olhcfs, to re.
ioaned @ out I'D expended. me Wit was appiiea ]
fpr ppun the ground th.t defendants arc now only
Jusieh t, KimhulI confessed Judgment in favor of
E. Webster Evans, 10 The amount Of x505 IS In The
suit Of Evans We. kimtull.
Baker aga1ns, G.nlsc Co.'s and G;hess 6f Quincy,
to recover damages LAG nt 90 lp upon certificate
oz ocPosia. T. Q! Aassa =: IN, is4i, of kaW
saa ~ - "ie4 -. T., az d 9t
faU4l Was eonloeneeo ~ y. Joan :: sArF, ID
ntnltua1ol ot tne 5Ate 9. ,Goeseppt fAseetu, de-
ceased, asnss .ae G's Q! Sn1caso, t6 recover aam-
aEcs ior INC death o. accea ed-A chla-a!leged 10
hare fcen alled y he Negligence Of the defendant.
Win tie G1ccpllon Of Ac PT3ItPsr no papers We're
llGd. -.-....
tastnia uaWley commenced case agninst Oscar
Briggs and otheEs, applying for IN injunction under
the following alleged state Of tccts: 1hat tho COM
plztnant WIS Keeping bcarding house known as
Iun Hotel, Al No. e6 Monroe street, t1 this city.
hable 10 mortgage OF Sl7sM some lime ago the
accepted the defendant Briggs rs partner In the
establishment, upon the agreement that TO ohiaiu
equal Interest. he should either pay OF the mort.
enEe-$1,eat0 Of which was then dne-ot else pay to
neI $G3Q in money and give her lease OF certain
household fu1phurc- She complains that
afler he had neglected 10 fnla this agree.
mcut. she unwfttiugiy, nuislcd by fraudulent
representations, assigned the lcse Of The premises
to Briggs, sn}poefnE the saue to he Memorandum
for him TO show to the landlord, 10 procure hts
eonscnt to the joint lehseeship Subsequently tax
Ing advantage OF hsr Mistake, the defendant Is
charged with having made tasc sale OF the prct-
ses End contents
Complainant asked Tor m injunction 70 restrain
MI parties rum netting under the sale, and also that
det.ndant be required to account io5 AL moneys re-
cdyed by him 10 Ftlation to the establishment
A ILL was f]ed By Henry Steer a.ninst Valentine
Rcis and others, to procure an amendment OF
trust decd and 10 confirm the title in complainant 10
lots s, end Z, block 4a Carpenter Addition, sold
REconptn,s corH1-Ihe Clerk Of this conrt win
draw for iurors 10 ferye IN the rrand and pstI
N1rjcs al this Court for the ensuing term at 10
9nr;neH m Friday mornlnr ncxt.