The Vermont transcript. [volume] (St. Albans, Vt.) 1864-1870, 1865-01-27
Franklin County Court,

Woodstock and Hon. Loyal G. Kellogg
of Rutland, Associate Justices.
Although Monday, January 10th,
was prescribed by statute for the com
mencement of the Term, no Judge |
was present and no business was
transacted beyond the formal open
ing of the Court by the Sheriff
and the Clerk of tho Supreme Court. |
On Tuesday the Court was opened
and prayer was offered by the Rev.
j. Isham Bliss.
In the case of S. Klouse & Co. VS..
Duclos and McGowsn, judgment in
favor of the plaintiff was affirmed
without hearing.
George w MCGOWAN VS.. s. Klouse
& Co, being petition for a new
trial, the application was, on motion,
dismissed
Homer f. Royce VS.. Wanton Haz-
yard was argued by Messrs. H. r.
Beardsley and H. s. Royce for the
plaintiff and by L. f. Pelton for the
defendant The decision in this case
was reserved by the court.
Gilbert Wells VS.. Roswell S. Wells
estate was argued on behalf of the
plaintiff by Royce Hail. and for the
defendant by Jasper Rand Judg-
ment of the County Court was af-
firmed
In the case Paschal Miller VS.. Hor-
ace Livingston, Mr.. Buck argued in
behalf of the plaintiff and Mr.. Royce
for the defendant. The Judgment of
the County Court in favor of the
plaintiff was reversed
In the case j. r.. Arlington VS..
Aaron b. Houston, which was argued
for the plaintiff by Mr.. E. A. Sowles,
and for the defendant by Dewey No
bic, the Court rendered no decision.
Benjamin II. Smalley VS.. John r.
Corlis was argued by the orator, and
by Messrs. Burt and Royce for the
defendant. The decree of the Chan
cellor in favor Of the defendant was
affirmed.
The case in chancery entitled John
Gates and others VS.. Horace Livings-
ton and wife-being the longest and
most important case of the term-oc-
cupied nearly two days in the reading
of the testimony and argument. H.
+. Seymour, solicitor for orators and
Fl. S. Royce solicitor for the defen-
dants. The court rendered no deci-
sion in the case.
In State VS.. Martha ID. Clark, being
a petition for new trial. the apphca
ton was denied and case remandod t,
the County Court for sentence
Messrs. Buck and Beardsley for the re
spondent and j. H. Dewey for tn,
State.
Lawrence Brainerd and others VS.
Maurice Casey and others was argued
by Messrs. Buck and Beardsley fol
plaintiff and Messrs. Dewey and Edsor
for defendant. Decision of the Cour
reserved
II D,n Al. l.
, was argued by Messrs. Ira w. Clarl
and Buck for plaintiff and H. S. Royc,
for defendant. Judgment of tn,
County Court in favor of the plaintiff
was reversed.
b. w. Fuller VS.. w. A. Jewett an,
Colcord, trustee, was argued by ID. r
Bailey for the plaintiff and by NJ J
Hill for the trustee. Judgment G
the County Court releasing the truste
was affirmed.
William Mullen VS.. II. r.. Sherma,
was argued by Mr. Buck for plaintiff
and Mr. Edison for defendant. TIL
judgment of the County Court in ia
vor of the defendant was affirmed.
Sewalls administrator w. Law
renee Brainerd and other, trustees an
receivers, was argued by Hon. Bills
I N. Davis for orator and Hon. lie,
Underwood for defendant. Case wa
continued until the general term
: Fairfield vs. Spooner was no
argued, but the excepting party wa
dismissed with costs.
The following petitions for divorc
were granted;
Rosella Richards vs. Moses
= Richards, of Fletcher Bill granite
, for wilful desertion Custody of tn
child decreed to petitioner Petition
err has leave to resume her maide
name of Reynolds.
= Sarah A. Waite VS.. Hannibal
Waite, of Franklin. Bill granted 70
wilful desertion and petitioner ha
leave to resume her maiden name c
Rogers.
Co.,. II MI. 40, w