The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1865-10-29

who knew young beacn anticipated losare eminence IA
his profession. and that he would become "a mature
Jurst" all OF which General Sckes states mas Deen
realized and appeals to his gallant soldiers not as par
ton OF the country have more than ordinary interest In
elevatng the best men 70 Office, 70 support him.
THE CANDIDATES. t
Dani p iSsraham Dan'i p insr.ham. No domination
l. Robertson Ssassisi I;ass P Day y..,.
Charles r. DAILY Charles r DAILY. No nomination.
H Hsa@, Gross p ssssssr
James Hayes James Hayes Andrew Bleskley.
STATE SENATORS.
40. OBJ Bryant Benjamin Wood M. w. Burns.
scA.s o. Cornell 6ai K g. Ss essasl Q. DEAN Jr
S2s1 sls: Ts;s?; s:s:s
7-Gen.w Mclean John Keegan. VIM. De Lacey.
DIR. rau,o,, A Sana R...s.,,,
aso X oceu us'is. Geo. NJ Curtis. Charlie. Riley.
ESohn hhsSc cy John McCsuiey Lewis Hippo
Wn. u. Tracy. VIM II: Tracy. sydney Smith.
;. ss.ssss s:s. on''' 0e.''''1 I'll Ssc..ssr.
.sr ). oi.n.r. IT,. Crane. T. s.d j. k ssdsasy
i,.s. s,'::s s. a.. smith.
Y Anderson e. n Anderson. Alvin Rose.
f-R BSrsd isaaS R. 3. Bradford. G. Z 5.Siin.
= - Donovan. 3? 70. w. Morton. 81. Gushing
SSss SssS:g fss.
Gwm H. Tray Tracy NJ = 0''"'' mos l'''''''
The United Service Society have nominated F. A. TALL
madge for Judge OF the Superior Court and endorsed the
republican candidate for Marine Court The hcKeonites
have renomnated both Robertson and Moncref for the
Superior Court and Henry Aker and Chas Prics for the
Marine Court The Citizens Association did have few
candidates IN the field, but they have all died out and
disappeared
The Registry Law and Naturalized Citi-
zens.
NEW YORK, Oct 49, 1865.
Hon. JoHS CocHRASR, Attorney General
find, while performing the duty as Inspector Of
Registry for this city, hat tsevera constructions are
placed upon section Of the Registry law, passed
in May, 1885, and therefore beg leave to ad-
dress you the Attorney General Of the State, and
to ask your views such officer Of the clause, Nor
is any other proof Of his being a citizen to be re
ceved unless he has first shown to the satisfaction Of the
Board of Registry that he Is unable to produce such
thcate The question arises as to what proof Is re-
qured that should be satisfactory to- the Board that he
unable to produce such certificate Your early
will greatly oblige NATHANIEL JARVIS, JR.
New York, Oct rs, 1865.
NATHANIEL JARVIS Jr ESQ., Inspector, &C., city of New
York.
Your note Of the 23d inst received containing the
inquiries what proof required by the present Registry
law that should be satisfactory to the Board OF Inspec
tors Of Registry and Election at their last two meetings.
of an alleged loss Of naturalization papers You refer TO
that part Of section Of the law which directs the
action Of the board upon the application Of naturazod
citizen unprovided with his certificate Of naturalization
to be registered, vizNor is any other proof OF his
being citizen to be received unless he has first shown
to the satisfaction of the Board of Registry that he
unable to produce his certificate" My opinion Of the
10th inst restricted the proof these meetings legal
proof
do not think that It admits Of question that the oath
OF the party legally competent to prove his inability
to produce the certificate This elected and each case
proof requisite to satisfactorily establish legal naturaxa
ton This fact evidently is intended TO be at the
disposal Of the arbitrary judgment Of the board but is
TO be considered satisfactorily proven when
tanned by the verbal proof which, uncontrolled and
unmpeached is held TO be not only satisfactory but
conclusive In law
JOHN CoCHRANE, Attorney General &c.