, 1865-07-12
LAW INTELLIGENCE,
Marital Cnhlpplness--Diyorees---A Brutal
Husband.--A Case Agalnst the City
Robbery, Lareeuy, &c.

suPER1oR CorRT-6Jort Judge HlJgin4-The
Court cpentd for br1tf session In the trtAl room.
and then adjoutned until Saturday without the
trontAclon Il Any bnnnefs Of importance.
Before Judge lFlAiasn.-1n the divorce caae OF
John N. Good Acstuet Sarah l. Good, the blll OF
compliant Of plaintiff Was verified by atudavit,
whtn in The oefAnlt Of defendant the cate was re-
te'red TO Aaatef In chsneef5 70 take proofs and
report. Complainant filed his hill June 9Th. 1855,
setting for'h shat be usr.ied he defendant On
cock comfy. an this State, md lived with Der m
t,l The 2o1h of September, 1851. On which day she
without cauee Of proyoeanon deserted him:
The Matters report vas. was alad ana d sona,ned;; GO d;
Anton Gsdd aeatnst Caroline c: Gtdd NE Wtl!a:
man, WHERE complainant sues for dlEaontlou Of
the marriage ne up.n the ground Of desefilon.
1s6d ttn forth thar be rns!ried the respondent IN
Sweden, On the 9th Of Octobef, 1873, and lived
With Ets ~ good and loyal hege mt Nay,
lso7. u ne nu.1a 1s.t named, comp atnant
termined to emtgra'e from Eusope to America,
snd accordingly Engaged rstsaee for himself and
wl:e upon A. outward rouna Vessel. On the day
ofeubs1 katl0n, when the parties were On board
the vceeel Witch was to take them TO lbett new
home, tht de!tut2nt dfet earnestly obi ecsed ard
thcr positively refused to leave her fe.he1lsnd."
in pursuance Of this determination, the l4ty-
Who believed that tooueh man II sxpec ed 70
leave AID fozEAke al ard clcave un1o hiA Wife, q
vile If not e.: ectad u Ect In similar 1asnner-
s'home1aId boul1,f y lesvInK her hu-b sad to pur-
sue his travel to distant la1d, solitary and
alone.
a. tbe husband had heard oshinc orhi spouse
spee his Tea.derce here, the Court 1uied that de-
ser ton had been proven, md Etanted the peu.
ton. .2-.,
John n, Case. referred to Master on The Sd Of
.n,i1 list 10 tnke proofs and report the order Of
rcfe1epcs wae ret Atide, snd the c4nee ordered 70
h. hesrd IN open Court The bill Of complaint
~. N iied JtnnaFy el:t OF the present Jezr. The
eyidel % received yesterday Wal to 'he cdeet that
the m rtes were married Septe embe1 a6th, 1861 IN
ch,cspo. ind lived together Rs man ana Ttle fot
at,cnt dye weeks, when telcncant pfoNeded 10
Cfn1nrati to work ~ 4 brid 20 cAtpcn ter;
Es11v in UeceuhcI. while Absent ff0u hts home,
ds1snGsnt fo.eetfnl Of hie mar11aee VOWS aud
-. ohiiort,or5 Is husband. committed hannety
IN nnr Of tFo houses OF ii'iAue ~ tne e1-foIs-
anits. The COAT ruling The ofense TO be suni'
cacn,ly proven, ordered mo Usual oee'ee c' Oh
Before Jud1e Gd~v-Tbe clse Of Aaftens A4T4
ilsI3 rrtt, At H,phtus C. HAvilsnd, in which CON.
ptainxnt sues for . divorce upou tns g!oGnu "
cruelty, wes brought into Court and y jnfy en-
pal need to tzy tho elmc The plaintiff n d hef
bill Of complaint on the 9sth day Of Last MY, eet-
ting for thbt nhe was uuitcd to The de!endaea n
the bonda nf ua1rtmouy On the 37so o. MY, -,
aud lived thus with him Tor 2bont four years.
Shortly af'cr the marriage dctcodant Ia alleged TO
hive Iestcd hts wife Tudely and undnd!y. re.
1ut1nr TO enpply her With neceas2fy food, Faaenf
or fuel, On one CccAelOr, On 4 cold, stormy
nIcht, he turned her ftom htr bedroom and com.
m lied her 10 remain tor como time in tbs bitter
cold. a,tired IN nothing hut her piehtdress
When fhe attempted 70 eject 20 sttrsne: to be.
room the brutal fellow ehoktd, Kicked and Other