, 1865-06-27
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
aerated Bread-A Defsultips ClerL-G1mblers
In if1lsulty-Fsra-..fls Pleasures AID
Costs--Land In LltIsstlon.--Laree-
Dy.~Deseltlon md DiTorce.

UErrEp STATES CoURT-B<}0re .udge Drum
moxd in the case OF c, l. Woodm.n AID ]. D.ko
~. o. Kendall, In which plaintiffs mske Appllca-
ton for IN injunction restraining defendant from
manufacturing aerated bread; TIE matter WIS re-
frrFed to usster IN chaneery 10 take proofs and
report to the Court
SUPERIOR .couRr-BGfpre .ud5fs Higgins ard
Ga.s.-Atcs discussion. the case Of Joel II. aud
G. G. Wicker agaip6t the Chicago aud North
western Rstlrosd Company, 10 recover an ano1nt
ofmenty for damages sustained By the loss Of a
number Of hogs, Wse given to the Jury, who, after
the plaintiffs. assessing damages $as5.
The SUMS claimed were $2,s2u and k7,3g2 for
hogs killed, and t25,000 damages
sghlnel Mary Ann shayt, Charles NJ. Clay ton and
Nicholas P. lcsehart, to zccoyer possession Of
certain lots, conveyed to ptaintif as payment for
s9 Il Ptn e.
for IN Injunction enioinfng The parties IRON ma
king my d,sposl',oi OF the property unttt- the
' Nelson o. Ii Mo11is, % isaac w.l1el aud Moses Reln1.
p:a:nt!s sne defendant, who Was ts5%ss]y clerk
Rsa tanas Of y tne @ Inn in4ased ts to ilH@ hi@.
The mi:mng tuOa consist of ts56s7, collected
s Mallory xa,6l0s7 On the s9th OF march, being
the unaccounted balance Of check for 81, 00O0
drawn on Sol Sturgca and on Bank, and in!iusted
10 Qe3VDQtnk ~ RpPt ~ E44t 4uEtEs6 6 " kuE
$l.1E IS appropriated March Sd, belug proceeds
Of = cheek gis.n by Bentley & Nudd; SIS 30,
March eotb, on check By John T. Wahl t1oj
gwen defer dart by Morris, January s5th, to np-
Sjy to ,he tpterte's OF the concern S2G5 e,ni-
tsfsy given April l5sh; S301 ii. Apz1l 50, being
bBsal ce OF check for 1886 f4.50, April 9Th;
jnEnafY 3Iet PIat1tlz in afdayit nas ert thut de-
fendaDt hss left the State, and pray attachuent
aeatnst rersaia properly he possesses IN the CITY,
The pr.re. .pe was 6Icd tn q case OF dssHnpsit In
which camace c. laid at $5Npare claimed BY E. s.
Alexander 5Ralntt s. E. Barrett. W. II, Arnold
apd II. ". Powell :.
An rfIidsrlt praying for a divorce was filed hy
Ca1hr r,nr Lotkiel aGainAt George Lcsktc!. An
ant states that she married de.tudant in Chfc,ro
On the 18th Of Msy, 1881 and ltred with him uGtll
the EpE1nx Of 1861, when he ces.rted her. She
owns certain property hequeated to her hy a for.
Iner husband, ana also come wh;ch lie has &c.
uuilcd s.pce the delcnuknt deserted Fer She
axis that deer 9 u divorce be 1saued by the
Court and u1I poss eeslou OF the property in 0ues
t,on be grant. d to her. 4NN'
FIVE e.se. in a,sumpsit wcye commenced By
LWle Duttop fsalEst Andy Daniels, Dlrrey Me-
]1s. Thomoe Uirds Isaac Apcereon AID tieorrc
Trusfel. respectively Damages are l.id At
fit tgu In zach suit except tbst aratnst Hinds
1iere sa0.c Co are claimed. Only tue n5@ci1tsin
The cases arc led 4D1 plr1jcrlafs Of the d1tfcn!ty
nave not ret been plQcet upou record Its IN.
deretono, however, that pis5nt:T who IS city nv
err stable keeper sues The defendants, most OF
whom are we'll known CRY professional gam b1e1a,
TO n cover mopt Lost by him to them, al tho faro
able.