, 1865-03-31

vIthdrnvs1 OF the appearance Of Smith. B1odgett
and Winston, and Smith moves 10 "1thdsa" his
is. Cssneery. 1S @ Smith vs. johnson: E1eep-
c1Hcr17 couEEB&for< Judge Williams In No.
4a5 Counun Law. motion On the p,rt O tael1.
terrleadsrs to effect judgment IN The Sapreue
Court for cosle, aud tint the same b. paid ont Of
funns carn.sheed anu IN court, WIS denle4
Qnimty vs: Delo. On motion ol pla1anu. sup
sher1f Ha@monr, to show cause. etc, this morn:
Ing. Why be ehonld not psy over to plaintiff
<;sT t61 made on execution upon Judgment In this
Geo1eie d. Peterson and hu.baud u The Estate
Of Bonner ct a.. This is an ac1ion Of dover
Bonner. whose estate ami whose grantees are
hese h Ely &c ehrea ns
i1st vile died. and be sohseqnentty married The
El~1nua, with whom be ired two months and one
ty which be len wss q very h,ndsome oas, CON
sfstfbg Of bolh real and personal estate. The
vie, IN the settlement q the estate, received
to the heirs at law. Bonner removed to New
York and married the plaintiff in th,a cause.
Shortly after the heirs at law died. and the prop
erty Faseed ln.o the hands Of third parties. The
vie now brings suit 10 recover dover In The e.
tate. Ihe property !: Or great valne.
6urER1oK coURT.-This Court was not in ses-
Cor:t, % entitled wm. Ii. Dunbar 4 Is. Gathefiue Il %
Dunbjr. The bill sets forth the marriage and d.
vo1ce Of the patues: that complainant being sub
s.Outnt to 1861 mariner m the lakes aenr TO de-
fe1dant large amount Of money, With which she
plr hate1, from David Billings, lot 50. In C. j.
Bulls sub. Of lots IL, e., ~ ana ~ IN Butter
fields addition, taking therefor the title In her
own nsrpe IN fec simple; that the entire .u.t O
the lot and improvements. Amounting to $50 =.
was pald By plaintiff; that The pIesent value ol the
lot Is iT0O, and the proper equltabty belongs 70
comp.a,pant. The bill conciudes with the prsyer
tn t defendant bc required to state under oakh
wh. ther the money or. The defendant wax used in
sle purchase Of the lot and improvements, and
th It, if such an order lc just Rnu equtnhle, the
Cou;t shall d. cree the u'le IN plaintiff instead Of
de!erdaut.. The bill raises severs! nice poIuts
With 1t Il lmportsnt should be authonsanyely
settled
:. COUNTY CouRT.-Before .JuIge Brad.r.A-The
will ol Samuel Row IVES proved and letters tests-
uen.a,y iksued to Sarah Row OIL bond Ut s5.6N
The estac OF Samuel Nimesch WAS declared set
lied.
as guardian Of William. Matte aud Jesse Nimesch.
: Gi,Ver Il. Horton was appointed guardi,n Of
Anot.w. George and Hettg Ann ,Comos On bond
The Wi Of Michael Brophy was proved IN / let
tcrs ttstsmeutnry iesued to Catherine Lawl.r on
this will Will he holy contested. The deceased
It will be remembered was at the time Of his death
under Indictment for adultery. Sixteen years ago
he marTieo, and shortly after separated from MS
Hife. Removing to Chicago, ,hc contracted an al-
Nance with a woman with whom he lived Us NAN
and wi1e, and by whom tie had ore son. This
woman died. md Brophy contracted another III,
nhcc With Catherine Lawler. Brophy died and
left his property to his son and made the lust
ttwlfa" his executrix. 1nterest ting questions OF
l.v will roublless arise, in which the right OF TIE
son to inherit the property will be canyasscd.