New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1865-07-22
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPREME CoURT-CHAsBPRs-JULr 2l.-!efore Justice
RARSAHD.
rORCTvINf, II ST ND.

~
Frederick A. Muller agt. Eugene Orskay.-The
defendant WE, ssd % be rnsaan coaa wa ssIesteo
At e .u,, Of Ire p1n g ssd, 4 lot Of s.ao bs
committed tie Lnflow IaL ihs deenc-nt no" moves
reduce the amount OF bail on IN adyit not de tns
ABDUCTION bat alleging, H. 'uh.ance that the peinir com.
promised with Liza tor the seduction a. davenport y"a any
that had been compelled BY tue cruelty d he Lnosna
apply him for and that he OCT OF ~, oa
FOR ~ had occasionally supplied h-r with small sums Oh
money AID that th. had been made the ground Of attempts
10 ertor notoy by suits from HIN. ..
The sfdsv' rehuttns iris tho'e OF the p'shln,
which Sc, that tie seduction IN 10" had been 70
By plaintiff simply or the costs snd exp,uses 20
he'd been put and uron the promise Of the d"end 70 cave
trail wife aud her more Ihst the ieiel1et aa
ssre,d this comprone snd he'd le ior chicaso We is
b. adj in confederation OF "a. yor'b oil n "e ssht i
bis home Dubuque Iowa sAd resins hef as s pass
erased. Az tins time ass ~ .teti wa oat Hos
year. and three months old From Chicago telegraph came
TO Mr-. Annette ed with tie mare o. ner o.otoetaw,
and stating that her father ere and desired 70 see her
She went the clband, and It tie depot
tn. Count. The husband discoverns his new error
of his wife egain commenced suit, and again
pardoned took her back to hi. bosom She came 10
Nswiok where the Count t9n net h. shd He'.G1ias
that would rnaSe h-I Countess, aud adding 10 these per-
sussons The ia.einayns o. r~,y ssin ~ SO ~ b,S
false TO IleF and 70 e VII hin .s ms ne h " ~
aud a.rwsd IN d Prescott House Here, according 70
Mrs Muers account he end AZ sd 20 prr'I1as Ne -
drsgs s,roy Mulrs chud ~heeuPcn they c'aueiea,
d Mrs Muller after having to SCI her jeweiry to snPPor
hsrt still third tine sought By and ecoheed 70 hef
husband , =,
coun.e fr the defendant eyed tat in this small dam,
YOU'D likely be iven oy jry and the amount Of oai
Counsel oI paintn while admitting ths. hi. Client almost
hi Whatever
asxesea that for safety he del nd Il II would be Wei
70 Keep hin confined otherwise the plaintiff might tle ths
law In hs hands T- Court reduced The bail to S2'o
INDIANA DIVORCES.
Hoffman AT. Hof.sn.-1ae def ndsnt moves to open
default and iOr leave to u IN an snse .etns sP inc
already divorced Nom by decree Of the Court Of ipiana
Tor such adultery ard dcsertiol.
Plaintiff Opposes the motion the ground that the original
adultery had ccndoled long before toe divorce in Indiana
which was procured by the defendant without her knowledge
or any re,derc his part that S,a and 'ha, therefore,
divorce utterly void end his subsequent marriage ia
a. other Of adultery not denied oy him. The
Judge TOOK the papers.
BAILISG A CONVICTED PRISONER.
Counsel for Shink, the man lately convicted fos
rioIs in troubles to-day applied have
him admitted bail he having APPEALED from The Judgment
against him.
Ths Couit held th., II would admit hai person
deIgon ..nence aud that the fact Of bis having appealed
made difference
DECISIONS
John b. Lowell Msgaet A. Lowell; Augustine Fleis'
Del Ggt. Charles tleisoe Resale burner AT. Henry l..
Burner Reports confined aud Judgments Of divorce granted
IL all oil the above cases.