The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1864-02-11

1nUkNooCAUEn
g&s MARINE COURT
Before Judge Alker.
FEE. 1o0 the stage opera singers have their troubles
as well as other mortas Just think Of two Max Ma
retzekB troupe-Signorta Sulzer and Signor Biachi-
being dragged up three flights of stairs to the Marine
Court, charge Of SANDER preferred against them by
cnamoermad. The idea may be very revolving one
to the hoJtue OF the OPERA but is nevertheless true
and what is worse STILL the chambermaid is likely TO
of with flying coiors. in the month Of November
last appears the artists in question were boarding
theresidence OF Dr. Regensburger Fourteenth street,
the Academy OF Music. The plaintiff in this action
Annie Wilson, onca,ed In The capacity Of chambermaid
ard waitress, and suspected Of stealing one hun
d.ed dollar bill from Signor Bachis bureau. she ndig
mainly denied all knowledge OF the whereabouts Of the
money, and when Signora Sulzer vcDtnred %
express an opinion as TO her honesty she
turned upon her rather sharply and told her to mind her
own business tina, she had az much access tho
any body, and probably knew more about the money
than the person suspected The Sgnora tnereupon ew
into great rnso and struck the plaintiff 10 the race and
followed up the istc demonstration by emptying dish
OF meod fat over the person Of the chambermaid Dur
ing the encounter the word thief was frequently APP
led TO the plaintiff by the sgnoriia, and the following
day, when the later was arrested and brought TO the
Jefferson Market Police Court charge Of assault and
battery the Doctor got quito excited and, allowing his
temper TO get the better OF his Judgment also made use
Of tho same cpthet
The plaintiff alleges tb in consequence Of this charge
of stealing made against her by Sgnorn Sulzer, SRnor
Bach and Dr. Re ,ensburger, she has suffered severe
aud unable another pace anu IS
compelled TO commence suits against all three OF the
parties for SANDER The against Dr. ReRensburger
was tried hrst Each party represented by able
counsel, and the proceedings unusually interesting
Anne Wilson de,osed that che was the plaintiff In this
action that in uencc OF some remarks maize 10 re-
ference tho DISAPPEARANCE OF hundred dol bill,
the properly Of signor Bachi, difficulty occurred be-
tween ho and Sgnorita Suffer- which resulted in the
latter being and brought before The Jefferson
Market Police Courr charge Of ashanti and battery.
During hearing before the magistrate Dr. RegeDs-
burger said he knew Miss Sulzer to be respectful per-
son, and that the plsnsiD was "ony chambermaid,
aud wound up by calling the later "thief" The oc
tor vTy much excited aud had 10 be called TO
order by the Court Miss SuZcr held 10 bail In the
sum 81 three hundred dollars 10 answer. Witness had
been unable to obtnn place since Three tIess,s
we've then examined for tho plaintiff, 10 corrobJrate h,r
statement regarding what aaspred 10 tho court room,
they oil agreed that the word thcI'' used by
the dc endant III the manner claimed
The defence set probable cause Tor suspectiEg
the aintT be q thief, that no had such easy
| access Signor Bachis room she had and that
any remarks deroga,ory her character jus
titled by the circumst nccs At'endng the mysterious
disappearance OF the hundred dollar bill in qucs-
ton. Jr Regenburcer Sgnor Eiachi aud others were
examined but their statements did not vary much from
the testimony 81 the plaintiff In summing up tho case
defence the counsel took the ground that there
that the jury would not be justified in awarding her
damages because she had not ct nuother place be-
| cause Of the remarks made as a. her chlr acte-
The for the plaintiff took the ground that the
remarks c5tircly unustiabie: that they were
highly detrimental u the good name OF the pIantn, ana
that since her discharge from r Rcgonsbursers she had
been unable to obtain any employment.
IL late In the afternoon when The case was sub
mted the Jury and Court ordered sealed verdict
to be broushi 10 the foil wing morning.