The Vermont transcript. [volume] (St. Albans, Vt.) 1864-1870, 1864-05-06
FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT
APRIL TERM, 1854.

ANIL lEtCM, 1904.
FmDAY, Apr. 29.-The case Of Hen
ry Il. Seymour VS.. Calvin L. Loomis,
Of Springfield, Mass, was finished at
noon and submitted to the Court A
Judgment was subsequently, rendered (
for the defendant, and the case was
continued on a motion for new trial.
The case of State VS.. Martha ID.
Clark, who was indicted last Septcm-
Der for murder, was continued on APP
phcahon of the respondent, and Sam-
uel w Dorman, Esq, Of Montreal, and
Hon. james OHalloran, of Cowans-
vile, were appointed commissioners to
take depositions Of witnesses in Cana
da in behalf of the accused.
The case Of Gilbert Wells and others
VS.. Roswell S. Wells estate, was tried
and resulted in Judgment that the
decree of the Probate Court should be
affirmed. Royce & Hall for appellants
and Edison & Rand for appellees.
The case of Daniel AIaloney VS.. vii
liam Martin, was taken up by the
Court and decided in favor of the pc
titioner. Royce and Bailey for petit
toner, and L. E. Pelton for petihonee.
The case of Dewey & Noble VS.. Jo-
seph Lepp, was then tried being an
action of replevin for Il horse. Judg-
ment was rendered for the plaintiff to
recover one cent damages and costs
Edison & Rand attorneys for plaintiffs
and George L. Houghton and n r.
Beardsley attorneys for the defendant
The case of Il. &. Want vs.. Clark Al
bee, being a petition to yacate a iudg-
ment of Il. G. Thompson, Esq, justice
of the peace, and allow the petitioner
to enter the cause in the County Court,
was heard by the Court, and resulted
in the dismissal of the petition. H. A.
Burt attorney for Mr. Wait, and d. r.
Bailey attorney for Mr. Albce
The case of Hiram Bellows VS.. james
Bevins, of East Georgia, being an ac-
ton of eiectment, was tried, and iudg-
ment was rendered for the plaintiff,
excepting the homestead, which is to
be set out by H. G. Edison, r. X Clark,
and Ichabod Chase, commissioners
Dewey & Noble and +. A. Sowles at
torneys for plaintiff, and Arson Soulc
attorney for defendant
The case of James Welchman VS. the
Village of st. Adams, resulted in d
: Judgment in favor Of Mr.. Welchma
for the sum of 81, 100 and cost. The
, Court ordered the plaintiff to remove
his buildings, fences trees, wood Oh
: timber, and lay the land open FOL
j working the highway by the 10th ia,
y of June, 1864, and the road was or
T. dered to be completed and laid opel
+ to be occupied by the 1st day of Octo
S Der, 1864 The Village of St Alban
U was ordered to pay the damages as
k sessed in the report, and cost, by jun
8 9th, 1864. Royce & Hall, J. j. Deayit
y and George +. Houghton, attorney
o for the petitioner, and Edison * Ran'
IS attorneys for the Village,
/ H +. Royce VS. Wanton Hazard,w wa
], heard and tried, and resulted in
IS Judgment for a portion Of the plant
if's claim-the larger amount beinl
defeated by the statute of limitations
y from which judgment the plaintiff ap
l. pealed to the Supreme Court
Exceptions in the cases Of ]. r.. Ar
e mington VS.. A. b. Houston, Cyru
l. Hotchkiss VS.. c. V Bliss, James It's
|, dale Va. Daniel DinsmOre and {.
Il Bliss, Paschal Miller VS.. Horace Liy
ingston, Perry G. Cook VS. Theophilu
e Foss, were allowed, and cases passe
n to the Supreme Court.
IS SATURDAY, Apr. 30--1he Court rem
dered judgments in cases not befor
II disposed Of, and after adjournment Z
n the County Court the Chancery dockC
d was called, and at evening the Apr
s. term of Franklin County Court endeC
A. after a session of nearly three weeks