The aegis & intelligencer. [volume] (Bel Air, Md.) 1864-1923, 1864-04-08

LAURA WmTsoN, by her In the Circuit Court
next friend X. d. Dnvall 1fnr Hartford county,
IL vs. sittug in Equity.
JosrrH wHTsos.
TiEpbject Of thissuit is to procure a
a decree AdivorclHe Laura J. Wilson
from Joseph Whirs"n.
The Bill states that the said Laura J.
was married to the said Joseph Whitson
on or about the frs, day of January, A. D.,
1861 that after the solemnizalion of their
marriage they lived together in Hartford
county, State IoF Narsand as husband
and vile, for about two months. and that
-allsr,ihat-iiiaa thessaidq Joseph, abandoned
the said Laura :. and has been uninter-
ruptedly absent from her for more than
three years !; and that said Joseph is now
nonresident Of Maryland, and that their
separation is deliberate and final, and ber
yond any reasonable expectation of recon-
ciliation-and prays that decree may
pass divorcihg NE said Laura pincuio
,tdt!fmonii, and for al order'of publication
warning the said Joseph Whtson to appear
and answer the Bill; and indeiault OF such
appearance and answer, that the Bill shall
befaksh pro contssso against the sud Jo-
seph, and for other and further relief
1t is therefore adjudged and ordered,
on this 9Th day Of April. 1864, that the
complainant, by causing copy OF this or
der to be inserted III some newspaper pub
lished in Hartford county, ouce in each Of
four successive weeks three months before
the Slh day of August, 1864, give notice to
the said NONRESIDENT defendant of the OBJ
ject and substance Of this Bill, aud warn
him to appear in this Court, in person or
by solicitor, on or before the 9Th day of
August next, to show cause, if any he has,
why decree ought not to pass as prayed.
'-H VIM. Fl. DALLAM, Clerk,
True Copy, Test.
'"- VIM. II. DALLAM, Clerk.
APP .. ~. .,..
y Az. SqREErr 3 \ s.ss-5'.. - d.
SAM'L G.. PalcE,
MARY ANN PRICE,. ..s. ....
THE object OF this suit is to procure a
decree for sale Of certain morlgaged
plClDlSCS III iiullpll CuNHlNs WHICH were
on the, 18th Gay of June, III the year
1853, inortgaged by the defendants, Sam
uel c. Price and Mary Aun Price, to VIM.
Williams, who has Since assigned the
same TO. .complaiDant. The BIZ states
that on or. about the. l2th day of June,
1863, the said Samuel c. Price and Mary
Ann Price conveyed certain real estate,
which is particularly described in the bill
and its accompanying exhibits, unto the
said William Williams, by way of mort
gage to secure the payment of the sum of
| ($1467) fourteen hundred and sixty-seven
dollars, with interest from the first day of
April, 1868, which was then due and ow-
ing from the said defendant to said Will
lialns, two years from the date thereof,
and the interest. thereon annually.
The Bill further states that The said
Williams has sin assigned the mortgage
aforesaid to one Andrew J. Caldwell, " no
has assigned the same to complainant
That the morgaged premises is charged
with and liable to be sold for the payment
of tho aforesaid debt and interest. And
that the said Samuel c. Price and Mary
Ann Price reside out of the State of Ma
ryland
1t is thereupon atiudged and ordered,
this 5ih day of April 1864, that the COM
plalnant, by causing copy Of this order
to be inserted in some newspaper publish
ed in Hartford county, once in each of three
successive weeks three months before the
q =
the said absent defendants of the object
and substance Of this Bill, and warn them
to appear in this Court in person or by
solicitor, on or before the 31si day of Au-
gust next, 10, answer the premises, and
show cause, ii any they have, why de-
cree ought not to pass as prayed
VIM. II. DALLAM, Clerk.
True Copy, Test,
a2S VIII. III. DALLAM, Clerk.