, 1864-08-07
HOUSE FURNISHING.
A Specifncn OF Home Art in Cdica~p-
First Claes AduFomcut.

1
HOUSE FURNISHING.
A Specimen OF Home Art i'm Cnicaso-
First Cl&es Adornmcut.
Hoasc furnishing in Chicago Is TOO much work
o{ h11szd, 7esy few consult tho setissac and Tue
np,opo,. We hare jumbled together medley Of
carpets. cha1rs. tables and mirrors, without regard
10 harmony Of design or colorins, and few pic
lures thrown In subsequently complete the adorn-
mcnt. This 10 the sute even among onr wezlthie<t
and most art-loylng citizens. There are very few
EXCEPTIONS
cursory cali 1t the residence OF one Of our lead
Ing citizens in the North Dav1slon-S. N. Nlcker-
day or two since, revealed one of
'hefe exceptions, 70 nla1kwos.by TINT VIC csnuos
preed at the elegance and GOOD taste displayed in
the selection, hsrmonization and Contradiction
q The furniture IN that mansion: we. certainly
haye' not eeen lts parallel IN the West,
and We doubt II New York or Pas1s can boast aner
furniture, Or more completely arranged; 1t il re-
es II .aaa ,Snes sosnsa Win het
take pr,ae In announcing that the hoase has bsen
fitted and furnished entirely by an establishment
il s1lssdyy We tnoas th'
resnlts Of his seyeu yeafs stay In our uidat hut
this IL peEhape biz nlasterpiece. which, while It
limony of the liberal tate OF nj. Ntcierron. We
F1eoin. bat We thnk i Is but inst Tint wealthy
tuch an a1titt among us, that they may encourage
yytT mrcS No. gs,sa un1 ~ we eas aone
beauty in Chcsrn We hei,sva h. ia Wn1eb ~
thc most dstterne eneominms bis ~ wors t o.
him. and their ra!ue has been Acknowledged in
hitinr. ~ ~ .nneroT ~ots,nohy ~ mhny lenen e3n'
psyed In specimens sent out Dv ts hou.e ss1s ,n
tts establishment IL cn1c.eo.
- a9e a to!lowne Getsliption wl1l give f.lnt idea
Ihe q Gay u atted With funttuse q new pat
tern, IN baeked French walnut, poltshed. with
o19Sk marble and e.lFeEed eEnsmeats.
aaIE bud ank sllk reps. The curtains are o. new
tiyie; 1ae casnaces ate rosewood cared ana glt
ne irane q shs mirror corresponds IN sty'e; the
very happE taste -,u
~, iaes iGnoMs me aaanG @ ioon-a inoue o. Aste
n r1cn eimptcty. me mantle piece and mirror
eneEussei with red and green matols, with bso1zed
ornaments. The foom e. eontain1 a1 French clock OF
nnlque workmanship. the tfst 10 zee IN this city;
We I H. F1ean On the sssaus aud
coed tasts displayed. Ths sids bo1.d and the
eennda "a 1ba ra-. ny the as, pnnd aas nd
Ta9rln anS S ornamentsd Wtsb ttee nails o1 eleeant
,9e ~. ;n fmgSt ; Is noee ana
iutNes ~ tnns tAt1. lee1nN q petisst ease Eatca
n so ~ 70 1ae o. eooa oinnet
lus , CusCS II , sesea, uotoceso &ih9 tane!Ey aao
aad harmoa'zing completely with the other tuEni:
t'1S, IT,. ,,.,,.. l., ,ts.,t e. A..
onrs y Iii Ths m aasse ~, 1u ~ NE ses
Ta!nat nfnamentea WILD LII eogny monidinRs and
,:h1a eISsnseo ane @ so,ns; ead9s ana can
nsseS stS n5 &c es e.
remark slso & csrd ard other tao'e, tmitsttons Of
an aucaent ssSle qai!s novelty IL our az; The
mltfot namc ts Fefy nnelf execatcd, !ight aud
graceful. and The corn,ees complete tout en.ena-
6e CT Tie most ATTRACTIVE E1nu-rtch without o.
te85s'1on; - re.,v snror,aea and a.,,obt.a ~ ,ts
beauty and eloquent simplicity which re!gne un-
osokea t9tongh ne paf!or7:ha most atttstlcaliy
va enrnKca RI M stsa ta1
srod nonoteny bnt not s 20 much - TO induse q ,ho
silk damask, in the style Of Marie Louise. The
center table is SUPERB ne TOP u otack French
raiin, WIN blus md While patstm<atsrIs. sur.
sdmilse1e saeet. rhe piano is of Frsnsh manu- u
| facture.. The whole is IN such good 1sste as 70
reject the utmost credit On None. Fredip, snd ou
OF sEill. -. -. .,-.-'.,'
The second story is Of cou.te not quite 90 ornate
ys Pe ssf saasn e,f e. 1paas sSaSs5
btautifu], q perfect paradise.
We need not further dwell. Suffice It to say tha
residence. En- We zee 10 reason @ wy our WEALTHY mei
should patrontze New York or Cincinnati to pro
cure lie furniture for tbeir hoases. They "a,
s1i1ed M t5au ahfoad. NeitIef DO p We regard il q
intt tsat thofo Eho hare built up their fortunes
Chicago should pass BY our bone artists for thoe
Of fsuch splendid acnleyements as those developer
hsye eesn q etosr as,isas ii slfs & %;dy pssP,1ed =
as5ss ?sssa
81 has Ut + IL e Gsiesso sua usE ior lin 81
more widely extended pa,1oaase than ;hat Whie
: hc LOW so aessFTsdls cr}oyt.
E Important Railroad Decision
In The ci1cu.t Court Q, the United s.Ascs for I!
= Northern District Of Illtno!s.
atE} David nows v. The Peoria, Pekln and Jsckse
3 vile Railroad Cosupany.-ln chaucety-fos !
= JUNCTION. 49,,
This case came on for trt' on the q inet, upt
. y,eional Injunction previously. allowed herei
1, The compliant appearing By hts solicitoFs Go
d d and Ghsnd's1,, oi Ghsc;sSo: s:s, and Il; Gro;
Is sol,c1soEs; eso1e anu ,1t.in mnssn. o. Snn,eag
ID ana soansoh Ana , n%RE!ns. tIP!s .,a 81,
ahsy
~ inhto1 aaa aef tht ~ tr VI
i ,ns o. eolft neAI tnot4lns. a. tnAe -! LINZ. nnH
ii the Court substantially as follows:
re havc examined nus case anu entc:sain Hsau
ssftocs aonet IN feRssa 70 +, ac' rsotRs r.
ID road Company, and authoeizes i t9 81 sons;.ns r g
~ railroad from Jackeonyillo to "a sale Va '
etna fasa; esk'n ana haSoT; H. q,
,d. the right to q railroad company to con,tclact
4. 4. tosa between: tetmill i nay select its @
dt. route, provided It touch the yarious interned
pess 9ssd b. ss le;s,a's nd r. ms ~
1~ nerte, gives the right 10 build BRIDGES O
4, the f1,rofs river. an thssef
ne Of the opiuion that " ne comp.
ri had The right to cross said Fiser q Pek1u and
NJ tend It's road on the western side thereof.
L6t snthorize snId' Company to condemn Ii nd for
NJ right Of way aod consttnction. The seEentee
aed secttGn o. tala act pios.oss .1a5 sa9 soulp
uss ..twhirs H. snSsenncntiy extendea to tiye5.
.snrn',Iete + the ssme within Ten yesrs from tie
..ssee II this acf s. INT the nci un:Fhere attat
anr fnyfntnrc nj nowers or fTsnehiscs Il, case
wo,k II rot completed within ten years, snd =
NJ. Of 1te mowers arc by the act made condItfona
depenar1t uron the compilation Of ths work wi
re Esne naneo any aS.,, mne
SAD tae sta.s sou!a, ~ useet ;md1,ns
Of forfeiture when the charter provides lor ront
end an sfsy clearly OF The opinion that no I
one lerson can sct up such forfeiture or determ1na
me past o H. sse
heir complainant has no right to question that pt
the In this case.
ows Dutna view the statute Of jane 11th. 1855
1t cooperating taa defendant, 1t maEes no ttifer
7ut whether the Illinois Railt,lad Company had p'
hnnr ~ - ".u as aE t W. 1aa
few and Jaekeons Tile Railroad COMPANY Of iii po
Aad heretofore 91vtn Or cnlnsed to The Illinois I
NJ M kailroad Comr1nJ, nna whe hes the poweTs
thsv 1nt,ak ~ ~ h.eoe for5asc, sT,,, r. wv
NJ f-,pT IN snr forru T. '''ti tS,i Gnrnor
~ - 1.Ssrtraa ., .ha e" "tv. ~.
rars ttne' which ,hes bad previously ~
cide eq 10 aSas an n y, nnIn,o s ;Saqstarn
nnt l