The Weekly Perrysburg journal. [volume] (Perrysburg, O. [Ohio]) 1861-1???, 1864-04-06
LEGAL ADV's.
Legal Notice.

AeEHuh ANWNhSOs
william RfdOut, Sarah1
Ridout, rarriet Webb,
Jane j.. Courser, Char
lotto Coursor, Gorneia
q. Courser and John
Bates, Administrator Of
William W. Coursor, de- ya,,d Common Plaza
ceased, Plaintiffs, WV
David NJ. Gsiiofd, Byron
Darling, Sarah Darling,
JerOwe Darling aud An
toinetso Darling, Defen-
darts.
I HE Defendants, David N. Mefford, byron Dar-
ling, Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling ard
Antoinstto Darling, will take notice thnt the
plaintiffs William Ridout, Sarah Rdout, Har.
rice webb, Jane J. Courser, Charlotte Cours-
er aud Joha Bates, AdminisiraDr Of williaTr
II. Coursef, deceased, did the nd day Of
March, A. ID. 1854, Ole their Potisou in the
Court of Common Pleas Of Wood County, Ohio,
against them, the Aforesaid Defendants, and David
NJ. Meford, setting fOFth that they, the Plaintiffs,
are the heirs Of law Of tho late William II. Cour-
ser, deceased that about tho LIST day OF July,
1854, precise date not new known 10 plaintiffs, said
William II. Courssr Sntored into = contract wEh one
Cyrus Darling, who was then the owner in fCo
simple Of said PROMISES for the purchase Of Out
Lot No. one hundred and ssventy-nine I79) in tho
town Of Peryshurg, Wood County, Ohio; that the
precise terms of said contract are not now known,
but that said William II. Courser entered into pos-
session Of said premises - owner thereof, under
said contract, and continued in exclusive and ands-
putod possession thereof until the time OF his deat
and that since that time Plaintiffs as his heirs
at law, have continued in possepsi,n of said prom
ises as the owners thereof that said Darling hAv-
ing failed 10 eHeouts and deliver deed 70 aald
CourseF for said premises, and having removed 10
distant part Of the Stale of Ohio, said Oouraer,
on or ahont the seeond Monday in December, 1S49,
caused said premises ~ be bid in for him at a sale
Of the same, Of iaAds forfeited to the Stass of
Ohio fer non-pAyment of taxes, and the 18th
day Of September, 1889, obtained deed lherefor,
from the Auditor Of Wood County Ohio that aftor-
wards, the precise date not being known to Plain
tfs, the said Coursep, being then in actual and
notorious possession ~ said premises, claiming III
tle aforesaid, said David ~ Asttord having full
notice thereof surrepdGously went 10 said Darling
and procured from him doed for said premises uri-
der which said Mefford claims title thoreto and
sion thereof that said Cyrus Darling has long since
deceased, leaving the defendants, Byron Darling,
Sarah Darling, jerome Darling and Autonetto
Darling, his only children and heirs at law.
Plaintiffs ask in said Petition that the said pro
ceedings, instituted BY said MoN6rd may DO enjoin-
cd forever and that said MsffOrd be enioined from
setting mp any claim or title to said premises or any
part thereof and that hs BE- adjudged to rcosso and
forever quit claim 10 said Plaintiffs all his right
title and nIorsst Of evoPy description in and 10 said
pro nses, and that said Defendants, Byron Darling
Sarah Darling, JsrORe Darling and Antoinette
Darling b. directed to convey all their right title
and in.orost in and to said premises 10 said Plain.
tRs. Defendants are notified that they are IequiT-
cd 10 appear aud W said Petition, on or be-
fore the 25Ih day of Nay, 1851
MURRAY g. PRICE,
Plaintitfs Attorneys.
| March 30 1894. 4Sf