New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-06-25

By he pconrrs that the ladietmcE. should be
'aas @ Hal and hmssa j. psiker 80 opposed
notion IL arranged that the motion oI transfer OF u
NC 10 hc United States Circuit Court ..1.a " argued
Nm rvar;s oso ross On beh&f If tha pfoeeusion. He
stated tina, tits application transfer the TO the
cou OF an act Of Congress passed March s. 1853 entitled
at relating lheas corpus ard gla,nr judicial pro
ceedmgs ia certain cases. This act designed 70 De IN
frsc darq TIE RcLoioi-a rebellion throteilg TIE very
csenc m e nation and IN which IL bad been sought to
aly tie State law against the Federal authority The section
rgoy any officer Of the Federal Government expoed
to criminal posccgon might tie IL tie Federal
was or bv the authority Of lie President Congress Of the
United States lie argued az consider lb.e length t-t a. Tie
lasg of TIE United States within end condemned no. me an
.hority the Constitution paramount "a al courts ana
Ju.d.... unless pronorlced e be uncoasiiuon, ~ tae
Supreme Court Therefore tie motion must De granted ~ 20
tina; point, tue &c. Of Coasses bad areaay been deasJ
by Ire supreme Court Of this State 20 be Yeil
nd constitutional reported IN the decision u the
case Of Jones Seward THE ground upon ~,drh ne
decision the bad been upheld in this was thot
within the Judicial po"e o, TIC Conff',. 20 N.Y. ~n
oresi Iurisdcon the Circuit Court o tAe ried sac. ~
ever care whore ultimate IpaIe 5silon coiii nv @
question might be assumed saa rshgaly e, ,.i ,.f
Sucgic Court 81 the United oiae' 20 one 90 a,o ~
al criminal pro ,suiion8 or TIE violations q the laS 81
state wherein question Of guilty Of not guilty TUNED upon
the confederation whether the 90 cone was aoue H
81 ia Oh Gcucc 10 the Ggt which ~4a conferred df e 'a
by the Constitution Of the United Setc, the orsaazton Oh
te Oogernnet, tine laws Of Conrre and the deiermnA
Of ts hseest court Of e state upon IT, were sipec, TO
yrice with the psrlnonn authority Of the Federal Govern
men. than should De puined by State Court as
toa Il lie un.ed Sia,rs As i had been decided by 'ae
supreme Cont o. tie United thai Consress g grant
dv existed aud that such jurisdiction hed been conferred BY
CJu-rs The United States Cifcnt Co9 tAgra 81, Tue
motion 60 remove the cac 60 thai court houd be fited'
DlsirictAuoTney Hall In reply aid tie Other sae coAa
claim that this wl1 anything bgt an otae against
beside tie oousutoncty he act; before tary a.e 20
that, they lad 10 discuss whether the lct toh,n,
tllt 40 tAs ciorols relating % c'4. s'4s apfAei %
criminal a4t tlas As Judgments IA tAs ..cs quoted
uaui question. Tie cited Ga ne ofher sie di no
llry brrau fhc parties n Tat suii might hove sore u once
L have gone 90 hrst. though % Dad been m ,ea ti iAe
at .. ya. fr relates t0 cyi csr bai wa' impo
proyiaen iad been made by tonrT's bow should app az
iy whl; rl tie Cour, WIS t. be- bound BOW enofce rs
Io, ono f'.ie ~ 20 80, +, 49, i ia a. Cor To-.
ral light 20 try au Indictment found iu the state Court
arl. M own ct1l ~ aa oaense asiin-, - own p.el-
Ion ,eteru.rod low Tire case ssoald' proceed
when d cone 0,ofe ~ NO. lc'ned couHe. lien qa9ed
i,' n,o United states Cirg court pa noi 9e' rceos
nv d. The f-ofe f aci ,inl j provide io i'' Ho'-
Ile mn..oe wis wei .c''ol that sy power hot ezprssy
reserved us tie Constitution az United states OF - nece'
..E s.., -. -t III ,f'' ,r. Sic cogfI not
.di'.tr zion of criminal w very 'oycrsFl WIS jucsop
hi .nl COCO. n not Nat vas % t'tct low,
.
at cory Indictment n irm agrrt c.,izci Of another
State .f.,o.r u the feden Government sh44d 20 /
t A. n .,. %. ,t. :, n-sr.,. Cont - i-',t /
IL United S;ffg rrJterl M gents fr0u state uut-
patton simply qasion % tme, of n ts s. stage ot
he coaslyey tie Supreme Court o, te lned st'e eoHd
lou have cone 80 fr. So sa. 60 father. aai ar.
hu-y could AZ tie gfo'f tle always 'a'o4 ~ ..t...
Cireaii Court when thi Cont hf refused 20 entertain Mr.
Nav ar ,e aul tho i section OF the 90 Of Congress,
.NU 10 Val HIf 81 .I al /
hc of,use CHARGED ~as Boz one n common a brt .i't
s statutes o is state, md 90 c-re could only be illned
Il. H.. ,... d .l.iy but he ril.t b. re..
ia.ge. sly tt :. te uosi extraordinary law ever
.,frd OBJ p..t ~ o void because D. uaac order 81 Ire
..st tc..s- 10 si .d ,yefy possible hl' might
however ,rct El o.. .roas 'y might ee lie denied ~
.afIor oc-rs m .e,-ug ile Rebellion bni ,hs case
ueyrr BY conre.s that tA at should apply
- q. e-'e which "a not y any way grow Of
a eai O aT e. Ceases. a ..s ?, Tie .e' COM
Gown te j. bDfc., tley vo.i y % was done by virtue oil
p. ON .i or p. w ''. ,'.l- u. .e ~ - '~' ''iH
or Cat O.. ~. Licnt might surrender whom De- pleased
only provides certain ine ~ lo whoschy mfn who bad
fore Che ttci s'rtc' sor, 20 would ,syc no nr.,licon
Ju.d s.a~ .fthc council abandoned IDS defense where
vss uidiion o. the Court 'oeause csanot be aid
L. I
teamed counsel tcn Ir.rrdeI with b. sse.t
ior lh th.t tho jlrsi zion a. tue United stf,s Orcut
Court -oall uut Gle dcsicH u: the E tie
state Cour'.x
Nn. A. Evar's esq replied % rio arguments the other
ilo, lc quoted toe words OF tho applied 20
CD 1iuds oi rnM ohersos m met restriction lld been
placed IN M operation by Con-rcs. The fct ~ express
pglso txsg enabling the state CD GpVear urs 10 proof
tha could do for tfs Di.'ri.i At1rlry idy
IL whore bin. statute existed olf ~
TIE lc thar the rsrsiion II Nrsuees was a-sei
ur ~ ENGLAND and spain might be AIRY c1rit, rct co
needing tIc with ffe Rrieil 10 bcg tho National!
ltcs.t tr the Federal Government should 10 tins time PIE,
friendly relations with 90 furtlgu powers. Hc tAcu
noted ufulcr Of other cases u support ofl previous
uIgrncli lld ia Iswer tc oFo diaac sd tie I'D
ln which TIE supreme Cont iai ntcfcTcl prevent the
roseslon Of L. S. oc-i g. Dcnsss against State laws IA
ron's~, with and opposition 10 cdcfal eIrrtnentt
Judge s,e SAL ta u tLi decided Tor the petit
f' h, .oril tLcn ease himself about going on with the
motion 10 rah he mi ner,. 10 woud il.r an eas.y
opportunity o consult DIS .t1lnto q c.lc.i AID would
{. 4yrI jud. nlclt GA Ncdi c.dlv July ., 1871 :