Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1862-1865, 1864-01-12
COMMISSIONER oFrIcR,
nee- mia IA I.lQ

December ID, lsS3
By deors the County Court Of Hsnrico Court, On
the lth day ofsePenee 1885, in ehALcsy pend
jacob snead Mary sness william Blackburn Taylor O. Black
burn Ab.olsm Blackburn Charles warsEan. Nancy War.
his Wife, wsrbr.an JcEina Seat o. vfo besis
her marriage with Fleming seaton, now deceased Jmna
=. Franklin, and Mary his wie WIN AIy s.e.d
Phillips and Eliza his wife who was lila snssd Bdss
water and Nathaniel Glenn, Psinhn',
wn6sm sread Thomas seAtop and Mar O. hs wife, Virginia
Blackburn, infant child OF ksth BIZ gerry
and Lucy Elem his VIE who Lucy Ellen Blscfburn William
Phillip: and susan his WIFE VINO va, susan snesS jsS sc.s
snd Jane his Wife, who Jane sn' sned Alexander
Gd AD Del snesd. Cha. BsEWstsr GeOde and Ages
bis % ss "a. As1s' III Doug g "a Al
Alley and Betsy his wife VIII Betty Newman Asa Newman,
Arena ey MslVins Alley, ey Mstha Alley,
children Of Rueben Alley. and NJ ia hs wife, Mara
his WIFE, who Lehs Newman. Jos ph hssnsD Poly
water, Francis N. Bdswaer and Henets Bdgwse, cdrsa
EDWIN Philips AID AHdsonsss ii. vile. LIZ ben Ss
3d. newman, child Of VIM Newman deeee cd and Aexands
Ne sac sp Main
Bhdgwster Francis NJ Bndgvstef Henrietta Brogwstr
ne YEAR, By Lotion n Enett Their guardian, aS i
assigned by the Cousto defend them in this suit spd said
years. BY Edwin Philips hi. guardian ad Item ssgneo ~ The
oourt 10 defend him in this Suit Defendeas,
cern vss fund nsss Principal s5 nov r,.1
the land made undo. former decree in he cause and 70 vhem
what proportions the originally belonged that he
as9 enquire whether the entitled 10 tie sdfund and
not appeared claimed heir respective proportions
thereof be living dead, and Dead watcher they Of
left any known DESCENDANTS heirs oevise other
pan their kndies who already parties 10 the cause and In
they have LEFT such descendants Lesor deysee
not parties ented distribution Of raid proportions Of
s ay ias I h Be- nov Ad also
enOgi'e ana report what terms would be proper 70 %
with future restoration TO meet the cansof any who
may hereafter show better claim Hereto And the said com
missioner directed sppcnt time and place for making sd
enquiries and ~ publish notice thereof week for four
weeks such newspaper newspapers As he may sec which
notice shA recte the Of tie parties originally entitled 70
and claimed their shares shall
REQUIRE them any may their heirs distributes
deve come forward said day and assert .sf claims
thereto inform them that In default Of such claim, icing
amons those who be parties " be cause
may show ourselves to be entitled thereto The SAID
lice npon parties the Anhe said Cemns onsr
directed to report upor said several enqu " 70 me court
With any matters specially stated which be deemed perl
By himself which be required 70 DC 80 stated by any
The parties hereby notified hsv nxed
Thursday day January, 1864, 10 A
my once In the city Of Hichrnond enquiries
ports required by the AZORES I'D decree. And follow ps
Ezssh Who married VIM keej, John snedsnd Des snead
Alley daughter OF Gatherns Nevm, deCe SD Ase Nrvmtn
and Mahala Newman children OF Maria oecessd, AZ
mes who married John Gordon snd Charls gwster, cdea
Agnes Brcgwster, deceased Elizabeth IL sA an NJ MARI
eta and James K Douglass endrn Ann dsceasec
who have appeared AID claimed hsr shares oil he
undsposed OF sd uadr he cCnro )nrt In tbs
cause and which they originally entitled II % or any
may be their heirs sbutees or devils g. are rel
Once ana assert their fund.- deauto srch
claim being made by them shan procs 10 epot distribution
thereof 70 .nohg who be parties
who may show themselves 70 be emitted thereto.
THOMAS J. ETAN6
de1S-v4z Comni sinner ccsncery