New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-01-08
Great Britain.


TIE L. g. STEAMER VANDERBILT AT CAPE TOWN.
The Federal steamship Vanderbilt returned to
Cape Town from the Msuritus, and remained in Table
Bay until Oct. ~. She then proceeded to Angra re-
quens, the Confederate RENDEZVOUS and carried away
quantity Of Goals stored on Pegun Island. which was
annexed 10 Copo Colony two years since. The Wander
ht also seized the British bark Saxon ofCspe Town On
British waters il Is said. that vessel leing supposed 10
have Oeen laden with part Of the cargo Of the Federal
barn Conrad cap'nrei by the Alabama, end converted
by Cspt Scmnos into teTdeg 70 the Alabama and re-
named me Insc-ioosn a vanderbilt 'nsh pm
p.ze crew on board tie Saxon, and sent her 10 New.
YORK FOR oou6onnafio The crew II TIE yop, Win
H., exception of The mate said t. have been shot by
FEDORA. Officer were transferred to cOasting vessel
and forwarded 10 Table Bay.
Mr.. GOLDEN AND THR "TIGts.
The following additional spondence has
taken pace between Mr. Golden AID MI Delan';
MIDHrgsT. December le
SIR: fOr the Grst time you now disaSow having I'M
putcd to Mr. Bright and myself the design OF promoting
by violent. Illegal or immoral means redistribution
u: the land OF tls eounti! Had You contented your
self with this simple dsaNoval u lighi have passed In
slenOs: bat heNe invented FOL another theory
that tie elg.u tesamentary division or lAnd 10.
h!ch you have better foundation in anything that
ie .rOn than Tor the former AID heavier asper
sion. You now ask my acGuiescence ia process VI
reasoning by which Won attempt 10 show the connection
between yonr iormer language ana your new ACCUSE
tion-sgsinst which grannlar. logic, ana common
senee Al one. rebel
Ivii NOT allow yoa 10 diver. from the real quee
ton a; issue into new discussion tie comparative
mers between tle equal division Of real property as 1t
exists n France and great part oi the continent and
the Custom o. pTlloeenUre a. il prevails here Int
l. subject islry opcn 10 discussion in our Law amend
societies " the aocislseeAce laesings' and As u
oa1 af.r TIE pocket 81 no living ifopil.tor IL Is rot
usslf - rf - very inpassenea "a. pai". bn. ilnss
point hos pos sD4v ~ IA 10 reSnlc.se your
present plea irn your iormcr language You now
pruitss only uBpute 10 Ia tie design vi latoribg te
einsl division oi landed property among all the children
the death Of proprietor. But this VIII not CORE
sPond with your reiterated charge that we conten-
plated isio amoag the poor Of the land OF abe rich
What yUu affect 10 consider 10 he our OBJECT 10 LILO
din 81 the iad ~ tine men eqeuily among ITO
children OF the rich. must bring the question to the
t,.i oi vour own Language.
In yonr leading article Of Dee you alleged tia; the
small States o. TIE Continent Regarded congress with
the Satisfaction with which the poor might regard
Mr. B.ighs proposition for div ding among them tie
bands the rich' now infer from your new intere-
tstou tina. asked 20 coussrue this ~ meanli OILY
he ..sfaci On with which the children OF Heb land.
ovrels vouid regard proposition Of division aong
them of the lands o; their fathers.
gain. in your letter 10 ne ~ Dec. you stated:
" Jh.s. speeches discussed deliberately in Two Lead
ug articles successive dsys ana in each of them GER
tain passages are interpreted rs recommending afe.
partition OF the land among the poor. Now, the word
partition repsrtion means simply division, and not
belgest .. Inheritance and yet with our dictionaries
at band you now ask nie u interpret thv reparioe
81 The laud smoEg H.. poor" only meaning to cay
that Mr. Bright and wished 20 compel rich landowners
AZ their death 10 leave their estates equally among all
their children. And IN your letter TO pa OF Dee H.
YOU repeat" the assertion that cerisin passage of
orr speeches bear other Interpretation than hat
a crib,d 70 them"
Now up 90 Tat date you hs, pat other iuterprets
ton on those speeches Ill that they advocated to
division of the hard Of re rich among the poor Tho
poor We ara now I'd 10 a;erpge, 20 mean onl! ue
children o. rcy .tnGowne-s
Then, oppose, must altogether agree Ia fotAre
sha' 81. coupled with Gracious, anu IN. aerAish
~. "A u Rome. No; IL the teeth III al these proofs IN
plain. uumstakaoe English 10 the contrary shoud 20
sac.fcing truth courtesy IN affect 10 concur
IN hrs new version oi youE language. which does NOT
admit ~ Two neaaings note your recantslion, o''
repel the attempt Ia raise fresh Issue 10 cover your
treat under "a IRE of minor ACCUSATIONS. Iwlu cobciuce
his curres delc. With merely femarklng tnat te
blow which was aimed at the fame Of MI. byight aee
,self rs missed !ts mark How r tue reeoii OF tne
weapon alsy affect the hsnd 'ns' ie'e'e9 nas W.
SHOW. An. SC. Il. CobpsS.
a. 4. DiIANY ESQ.
You reprosch me for having made the col cession'
20 France of undertaking 20 levy no export DUTY on
Goals Sir Robert Pool had abolished the EXPORT duty
Oh coa iDr the benefit Of England dozen years before
years more. wond not he 81 foolish "a 10 put any
imp,iinents IN tho WAY ot our exports: as Iof the
xner duty IL the interest Of the British public 10 buy
eyerythipc In tho cheapest market II foreigners put
foolish restrictions the export ofrags IL IL an sd'
dtiona ros On why we should take their paper. THIS
msy--cnd AN sorry for it-for time but only nor
I, ne be injurious 10 own manufacture OF thss
article which believe you or yer family are Larger!
engaged. The difference between You and me in 1850
was that was looking to the public interest, and you
were advocating TIE interest of class.
MipnuRsr. Friday Evening, Dec ls.
SIR, SIN compelled reluctantly TO resume my pen.
aer having scnt 10 the post what had hoped wss my
iinsl comm nicaiion Bat this mornings Dolly Nsts
hioh has Just reached ne, contains statement which
cannot with honor be passed over either BY you or my
,n; IN silence. In tho frn. leader Of that Journal !
heye read for the first time tho following passage when
plrorts 10 be extract from leading article ID Jour
journal Of the s6th of November or the following oAy
Commenting on the speeches Of Mr.. bright and mysst
st the Rochdaie meeting; ,,.,
This language often repeated. and g eSSSnsSc
10 excite discomfort among the poor and
has really only one inteli gible meaning: Reduce the
eisctor al franchises fox when Jon have done 30 you WI
OBTAIN sn ~ ,emb which will seize On the estates OF the
proretors OF land and divide them gratnitousy among
the poor Ii may b right 20 reduce the nAnehns
bnt certainly not as step 70 spoliation."
sincerely trust thore some inaccuracy In this quos
ton. which Is no. only hbelous outrage upon Two
millions OF Loncst and industrious Englshmsn. un
be a correct extract from your loading article vnen
bove no means of verifying at the moment Of wrns u
IN direct contradiction to the statement made jour
last letter. that you never Imputed 70 nj nans 81
dividing tie lard BY change IN tho law OF succession
Assuming tho words to be correctly given you chA5s
us s nety With aiming ut the seizure OF the ahato