The New York herald., 1864-10-05
The World Libel suit Again.
RENEWAL or THE MOTION FOR DISCOVERY or TtfE
Bo0Es--iNTERBSrING PROcEsDIN0s,
fysx
Before Judge Leonard .


Before Judge Leonard.
ocr 4-0eoro, Opdyks Mdstor Marble and others
Tho plaintiff in TINS action the motion for the
discovery OF the books Of the World establishment for
the purpose ascertaning who the responsible
sre inat they DO Joined a. parties defendants in
libel commenced by the plaintiff for the publication
a oeren articles the signature Of Thurlow Weed
Among adavits presented by the plaintiffs council
In support Of This motion is that OF William s. Opdyke,
which defendant complains IS Irrelevant to tho sub
ject Is. all s essential parts. grossly soandaious
and The motion therefore, before the Court
TO strike out certain portions OF this aillavit
Ss as and mass Win NO
other ob ect than crafty the personal spite OF the
paiot and his counsel The counsel then proceeded to
road that part OF the afidavt which he moved 10 have
stricken out, as follows
That IL sspte%ssr ,l% mt & isis Drss. aea .orpS,
snd.vi. q William Russell heretofore served The Dc
10 sss esss.s 10 a ssdeSss
is
1s
u: s,:sis @ y osssi p.rsi;. Who
Ss e ss e oa
psrs eh.sssa ssvs1s %s. and
raiions pre.snded corporaons with names nearly sI
having been Srooses one fhar.ow wesd became oos
o % or % two IN s .r
claimed is leading editor. although during differ
psrs. .sa s.o o Isrsn, :sotsn. q as political
pary .na - .n,s nss oee9 ca I'M informed T gentle
"a%ns saS stsSi IN ;s seipn s and aspo
@ nsn said
and S. % w s and ma s ne
ebanec Of cwnsrship mmnent that he the said Mar
Of the poi,les psrv presioo.ly That he
os one 81 hs Dss Sa f
% 10 a ss % ~os s.ye % e sos
ss ss rs. YOU'D s: or.S Sr a 70 v a
The paper g .ss .,de sr the opposition ..,
rropr ,ors OF sd ncwspsper 10 ts real
ss s os .soys h: . s sf e
s 10 the Spo. ~ h s .a and interested
The counsel for the defendant then read the sdavn
Mr. Marble TO show that the allegations contained 10 the
affidavit OF Mr. Opdyke. were scandslous and Irrelevant
also 70 show that Mr. David Dudley Field the counsel for
the plaintiff prior TO the commencement Of the action
opened correspondepcs for the purpose OF ascctaong
That Mr. Field referred Mr. Marble for informa
tion and satisfaction the subject but neglected TO
be nsd reason TO believe thai pavid Dudley Field ia con-
junction with the plaintiff vas availng himself OF this
scson 20 rsduce ana Why dsponens under the cover
ted and prepared the adavt above mentioned Including
the part ooecd to AZ irrelevant. mpertneut and scan
dAIous.
Mr. Field a rising to oppose The otios 10 strike out
sad u vas unnecessary TO road all the Adavits be had
10 hm hand bat would submit them just a. thoy were
tcv tho consideration OF tho Court He had the petition
OF TIE plaintiff tho sdavis of william Rnsssl and
affidavit n william, r. Opdyke, one OF the attorneys tn
the oass 10 addition 70 this Mr. tied read the adavt
Of Aersndsf wiIdor. Who testified that he knew Mr.
Marble siacs 1858, whom be oounected wisb the
R~ssine Po; that NJ. Marble engaged ~ night sd.
tns q ths World In 1881 ana subsequently, became odsr
nchs, apA bad sotsne bat his SALARY 70 depend upon
during that period DeDooeat also believed, fron what
he knss Of nevspapes bSnsss. thas II impossible
70 conduct daily nevspaper on capital k 81 Ooo and
p the object Toe eoupee thea introdussd tne afdavs
M nvM Hoadisy asd Riohard Grant whias feg The pvr.
the edhe o. The wovld sad THAI thosv wsrs capitalist
IN " hack Ucsha whs were NJ rsai o~nsvs e sns
soA osscsdsd With ths adAxN Il me PLAINTIFF In vhich
he sAaad thst III Wssk tubbheA skty -four articles
against HIN, 0Os2 n wAth weee lefanalssr ed sAan
Mr. Lfvuss saA oNAeA ~ Ae9vnspl utA ieoG(Ay