The Weekly Perrysburg journal. [volume] (Perrysburg, O. [Ohio]) 1861-1???, 1864-05-04

Legal Notice.

ANkuA NVAACCs
william Rdout, sarahl
l,idout, Harriet Webb,
Jane J. Courscr, Char
lotto COurser, COrnelia
g. Courser and John
Bates, Administrator Of
William u. Courser, DE- yV,,d. t,,,,., ,,,, tl..s
ceased, Plaintiffs, "VVU VV'''~'" was
against
David NJ. Mciord. Byron
Darling, Sarah Darlitfn,
Jerome Darling aud An
toinettc Darling, Dcfen-
dants.
4 HE Defendants, David NJ. Mefford, Byron Dar-
ling, Sarah Darling, jerome Darling aud
Antoinette Darling, will take notice that the
Plaintiffs, William Rdout, Sarah Ridout, IIar-
iet Webb, Jane J. Courser, Charlotte Cours-
or aud John Bates, Administrator Of William
II. COursor, deceased, did on the 22d day Of
March, A. ID. 1864, file their petition in the
Court of Common Pleas Of Wood County, Ohio,
against them, the aforesaid Defendants, aud David
NJ. MelfnrG, setting forth that they, the Plaintiffs,
are the heirs of law Of the late William II. Cour-
ser, deceased that about the fst day Of July,
1861, precise date not now known TO plaintiffs, said
William H. Courscr entered into contract with one
/ Cyrus Darling, who was then the owner, in fee
simple, of said premises, for the purchase Of Out
Lot No. hundred aud seventy mine (f7e), in the
| hwn of PerTysburg, Wood CorDty, Ohio; that the
precise terms Of said contract are not now known,
but that said William II. Courscr entered into pos
session of said premises as owner thereof under
said contract, and continued in exclusive and undis-
pucd possession thereof until the time of his death
and that since that time Plaintiffs rs his heirs
at law, have continued in pOssessi OF said prem
| iscs as the owners thereof that said Darling hay-
| ing failed TO execute and deliver deed to said
COurser for said premises, and having removed to
a distant part Of the State Of Ohio, said COurser
on or about the second Monday in December, ISI0
caused said premises TO be bid in for him at sale
Of the same, as of lands forfeited to the State oi
Ohio for nOn-payment Of taxes, aud ON the 18th
day Of September, 1852, obtained deed therefor
from the Auditor OF Wood County, Ohio; that after
| wards the precise date not being known to Plain
tifls, the said Courscr, being then in actual and
notorious possession Of said premises, claiming IL
tie as aforesaid, said David NJ. Meflord having full
notice thereof surrepttously went to said Darling
and procured from him u deed for said premises, un
der which said Meilord now claims title thereto, nnt
is end,evoring by legal process to recover posses
sion thcreof that said Cyrus Darling has long since
deceased, leaving the defendants, Byron Darling
Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling and Antonctt,
Darling, his only children and heirs at law.
Plaintiffs ask in said Petition that the said pro
credings instituted by said Meiiord, may be enioin
ed forever and that said Mciford be enjoined from
setting up any claim title to said premises any
part thereof and that he be adjudged to release,
forever qui,- claim To said plaintiffs all his right
title and interest Of every description in and TO sale
premises, and that said Defendants Byron Darling
Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling and Antoinett,
Darling be directed to convey all their right, title
and interest in and to said premises to said Plain
tilfs. Defendants are notified that they are requir
cd to appear and answer to said Petition, or be
fore the 2Sth day of MAY, 1864.
MURRAY & PRICE,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
March. 80, 1861. lSf