New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-07-20
LAW lNTHILIsaENCE.
Court OF COMMON PLEAs-sProAL TERS-JuLr 49,
Prforr Jpds. tRADN
TIE TAX COMMISSIONERS DTPFIcULrY-aR. Will
~

" dl.ohsrged on habes, corpus
Tho following is the opinion in this case BY
cb1sn n Woodaa applied 10 Justice barnard for order
ss-.t tic resor and Josiah w bIown 70 .n1. ssse
boct pape.s voucher. sppesnins TO the office q ON
noners TaIe. and Assessmens Tor tho City and County
The order wa. pedcst-d Of the calm that the .ppis.nt'
had been duly appointed such ana ~s,s @
Ic. BARNARD a. The result Of the application ISSUED III
warrant on The ih Of June 1854 to the ShrrA eomm'tin;
htown ard WILLIAMSON the i Of the City aud onnty OF
h5 pa 20 .ns Safa R aa SP books ."
I'D voucher should Otherwise be discharged according
hr proceeding. had before Jusies Barnard Including the
warrant leaonsJ royiowed nPon eeriirnh by tn.
Grneta Term OF this district and Affirmed On the lBth OF
June aud williamson sued our ~Ti, Of rrror to toe
Conri Appeals and obaind fro judge Dayie. an allow
ane. thrr, aud order stsys uoerdins1 on the sppea
lion mentioned Ga the i@h Of June following ihe Ia"f
was ad the warrant Of Justice Barnard aud now s'A'
to BE- di.chnsei. substantially. for two rrasons -,
l. That the oeess of commitment not valid bersnse me
bc ppe .ad rSnee are no, .e.ess 5A a rnd Of
euor and the order Of J1dss Davies stayed al proceedings
either Of these proposition. be maintained The relator
is Judgment entitled To- VI. disebS9e In view ot the
conclusions however at which hive suVd Ia this matter
II no, Necessary illustrate the power discharge aud
,ha proceed to tho consideration Of grounds ta
The ,'s'ae wach provides the remedy enforced by tho
newly appointed Commissioners summary ~ Ia OPERATION
ants a prima facr title to the office That they
have ha been determined Justice BARNARD snd by the Gem
rr Tenn Of the supreme Conn OF thl. District aid must
N, r.fore De considered az re- audeaa 90 tar Dc affects
Where the lille to al Office 1. clear thsrs be doubt
NJ the jurisdiction - Justice Of the Supreme Cotr to
pv delivery Of the books aud paPc arainng to .aeh d.
bee. On reference 20 d statute bud thai the ppCat on
Provided gesaAp Tor the books sud papers and spch
cy for the book. and pa be nand aud that tie war.
delivery the books .nd paper. generally for such
books and par. AID DO, specifically TOR book aud paper to
psJ-r-hOw nIfny aud by what maine % names kno~-s
imposed upon the officer whom the application l. made
iudsut vested Ht TO
deenne that Ior hse snd for all PseS In tho hf'' In
stance.
tn, inquiry which pr.eede. the issuing Of the warsn, into
tie ciIcumsincs- Friaies more parrgay II not eschn'ry
to the Ste II the office the books aud papers APpeItnn9 to
which II, part % the franchise t',h;
WLsn book. srl paper brougs IN upon the authority
of tie os ef 10 iguir. wheer the. beotg the office ~
not. Tie coniuit'nt until the booss rni p'pr' are Do
Tweed grnorsl haze but 1t l. jn. hri by the
r,easr i.inrr u the proc-sdrgs sui ihr relation Of
Ire ie,pon eSi to he public .ni .r.n The respondent
AZ, cannot expected 'hr and rnoss issu-
prrued by The former ri rnee TO tnea 80 h', The
gupon 10 The uuub'r. Nance OF character CT "a nifty
may be- determined The rsp1Ddeh has no ra'on 10 ofJ~c' 10
The her does not conn lain that there l. any an3iFuy
about he 20 Be performed by him bat chiefly at by be
rn ~ ne rsr VI sheriff Il Vested w,,n J@aieisi Powrt
10 determine whether he act done ~ po' hr uA ne o.
the lroce lug rr The oer 20 be- obtained b. H. the pro
,in. Of he ia'rie govrr g. au3 toe practice IL aao
sous case- di-r+l the suggestion mentioned =,
s es;as uos What be- j. 70 DO and bis refusal TO DO II
wAai 20 DO nui tho npi1n aa he ihHt hr know better
than aAY o;Er psson 't al q upon TO part WIN any
no, ov beo. 10 ar o-e bu, 10 or which he har c-asrd
hold - fr thH pos"on concerted and 10 eou'iiins
invion Of any rhL Il Is proceeding. ny attach.
urn' for contempt IN which pary j. COMMITTED an be dees
be thu witness or rroipient -
Sec q Rev. stat So The People at Roger Page. 100
itsrbours Cd. r. Vol |. Ia.
have doubt e'hr ,s the rala,or. delsens books
,ndrlPr, hoes"rnle h an sidv' hat thsy arr al ihss
belong t. the oc. n queon he Shert Won BE- Bound 10
l,eAasr him. BaEbaf CD Pr Rep. Vol Isl Anon. mad
lie lalier s 20, lnvcrd with L., power bold hln
syonl tst tlInc. 70 be- dtsn HIN be- could ao 10
shcrr the book and spcrs ara 'pcinetiy named until ne
bal looi Ea tsE !sr1ty not ~ be- doubted The De
'rldut ir su,r however, the ncourcrsncr retuHilg
ho, nc H. l.ns b.. 2. he burden II 81. own d.o 5ernrr
ard ,snno' Wlih trony complain NJ te compelled sp
ry or relei proper esaiiou ,hst hes has coupled ith
a'niary requirements similar applications charaeerises
u. ~ reported oa.a., and Eay D. az tina psrcedei 60
a. b W asur Z gsisr = lIss Pr Rep. .a ia tho
u''ef 81 linF HarbouE, 10. Coffee sgi Dess How
fr t'p. it7i j. ns uneT o. Bartlett How, ff Ftope
,n.i Jude IIr.haa. 81 DE matter Of peyl'n
th..e ,cs- b,tb. l-.h.5ss u MI D~,in zined
s' rsrsi iui-, it- mosf lsolonud o. pss a.
VIII h,g. y DE ,es. @. D. qe.,i.9a d.seHssed.
puPdlig q th- coaaitnoui IN se9p~ and pirsse'of,
Tho w'sn We P'rj y Ne r'nr 90 ihs ce-aoar nd
81 H- Y-e,els, Of Iu.iir- BARNARD. which were a.
H. f-ri mon ,6r ou..f,as ynlr rsasidorsian bg tk.,
Doe uo. sar,i t.e fat thai he .dissf 81 Iu.cs Bar
nsrl. II whi,h 10 'ysrrant va, p,li VS. aasinni.
ior 'ie l,g-. iul ilg tfa' efog''ll.n 6 tho re'of
hy .e- ~ % Do code wit. % erro' they Aavs here
fHre fKcd Ia III. ~ iona AZ rte.ari aHi f Only mode
Of reviewing aigu. orfr In civil acon shi be
pgrraod ~ title 81 II the Coo. Section sc pgoSd,
IN fp q my be iaAen % the Court Appel, ia is
mont aud "a .sst.n n ani s-etu N rrosic. that the
Count - Apgcfs shall h.ve rSclfrsc lpdction 10 review
uoou arfea oy.r actual d-rfuatloi i, gcn,lllcrn
NJ he qTene c. in hnn order ats-'1f su. .a is
dst made 70 rpscial roreeirv7 Il conceded the
lsrumori . 'h u'tt'f TIA, ite rrocrdusl b,r" justice
T. Tnlfi s'cs within the parsor of tie Cod. 1he
Cic boz lel no doub, he subject. ~ cion % % 30 un
, o.d iaiy p'orer Jog 20 c,sd II u.u ~ .h ay-"y
. .tiIfr lfl pr TOT 't ftt' i
arshiile rdrl. ~ Ir,seni.n Il wforE n thc plrh
srs, rcerdinz' Cy sriions "a ~ IN 10 courts of
record Il 'i' state sha be commenced b. "a service y
suanona AID o. W. 10" t"' prcc''inis -fc 10 M
tuied % The particular aodc prescribed by %. 'i-sc eea'a
Tie Cont O Appeal, ss We ivo s,an b. si.diciou o.
lrpe6 .nY fn1 order rate n furh proceeding
src,ins ~. an Ithi bl, secor al onecp. rom the
crTlti,u = tie -econa st Of Tie code crr-e posiirs
mined nd any pocil 80 n'o3 -on.dy = efrio ob
,-, % s1 ga ne .,' l s ,as ~ g. ,s
de-, .s wit o.! ror o opy usc Of Io., niis appeal
rs.n,raton hag,,ur e t, e. 30 wlrh ~ iou n b.,
rc,issa coAs 80 JaasA e.n'i.aeiiga ~ The coar
ran,rt NJ aou,t j. IN nay mind That d. proco~ rTs -
,onrfl l.' u..'rJ p - h'H Ilp.ii ~ ~" ~ g.
icn,r.n s-i i-us :. ail 1e To Co... Of hrFsl Is
f,rsci mann y No. n dr. illqae Of tie 'upremc 60nr
ulru crflo-i 10 tsi" tI.fy Proceedings !ot lhe re-
c'yc-y OF lend.
o .l~ er- Of si- i'.t,r a., -, Albion S.ps Road Co.
ire, .r ii-i,n. II 300 iupaone cgr ~ -lpei feln
decision ol 'poy NopH n c,afd - te cu-ee e.! ioe''
,ic ass o. De .l % ,royi g. 90 @ .s - i9u % plk
al ecnpsfir. pl.. Mos i17. which b. 'e,toD y de-
-poa sa T.! " - aa, - upon Ao tEs,.y nat writ OF
'foi vs. d. fa"f' of Dtsins iesiow Ihr -.me c'Ic
Gus. aul w. r-s i.cenau 49, ia. enc oi Tho
rc,ue sci sa r ,is;ors srpi.d To- cvi,.orsri 10 j.
i..ta. NO alos'rs sa.ai iorvr rHds. er act Of
ii1snse aff6 ~ trh1e frspi Ito ny Inc Of rocklyn to
rSe ii.s. aa>scl by Ia,iee Dso~g AID The ord:r
j. u.f; IL Hf of csiIlOcfi suppose 70 DO spela