, 1864-10-25

Bucks comfy, Pa, {patent Feb. %. ISL!
William scbneb1y Of Hackenssck, n. J
Thomas schnebly Of Hagezstown, Nd
: (patent Aug. "a, 1889; samue1 Adams Z
Monmouth comfy, N. j., {pateat oec' !: :
1so5); Peter Baker of Long Island. NJ
5 tateLt Feb. 10. 1919; Jonathan Reaa.,l
Alton. Ill. (patent March u, lo1s]
I Damon. A. Church Of Frlendsnls
: N. T., -{patent May 4, 1s4D; FeFdlnan
Woodward, OF Upper Freehold, N. -; ooe
J. Bussey, Of Baltimore, Nd (patent DE-, 81
1883. described in the Farmers Register Ion
anterior to McCormick's claim); Henry, a,
e len, OF Fayetteville, Tenn, (oatent June Z
$ 1850; E. Hope apd J. hope, Jr., Of ches1e
6 County, Pa (patcnt May Is, 1885; Abraham
a Randall. of .Verona, n. T., (pstent April .:
1855; Donald Cumming. Of Whltsaeid
t Northumberland county, England. tpatea
! Nov. Is. 1911: James Dobbs. Of Birmiug
: ham, England, (pstent March 20, lSl5)
Charles Philips, Of Chipping Norton, Or
ford county. Erg1an3, {patent NoV. ~
1871; John Duncan, OF Westminster, Enc
lsnd, {patent May l, 1s45); Seth Lamb o
New York, [patent June 20. 1870; Patrick
Bell. Of Scotland. {described in Loudor's
Encyclopedia Of British Agriculture, Loa
con, 1881, pp. 42222-427, and In the Quarterly
Journal Of Agriculture, vol. !, May, 1888 /;
James Ten E5ck of BrA1gewater, N. j., {p4-
\ tert Nov. s, 18o5); Henry Og1e, of Remtng-
ton, England, described IN the Mechanics
Magazine In 1896.
Hero was certainly wide field to choose
from We do not affirm that MI. McCor-
mick compiled all Of his machine from this
| n$o 81 h,,+ I.
DEGREES Of the Circuit and Supreme Courts
Of the Omitted States, In the case of McCor-
I mick vs. Nanny, were as follows:
"c,rns H; MscofmieF s. ' 4a''' .
$s;:s Bi,6n a I'D s;lssstai In chanceFy.
Ta1cott, euFsiyOrb Of John
H. Nanny. deceased.
"Th,s causa having been brought to q ina, hear.
ipg upon ne pleadiass and proofs before The
Judges Of this Court, IL pursuance Of md ac:ord.
ipg TO certain stipulation entered INTO between
the parties thereto and entered OF record therein
at the last July term OF this Court and ,he Gonrt
having fully considered, and bring nU@ fully ad-
vised opsn the matters heretofore submitted, are
o. the opinion that the defendants are not yuilty
o. any lnfrine ement OF the said complainant lei
ters p.tent Get ont in said blu Of complaint IN AsT
VI, IN TIE SAID BILL SPECIFIED
Aud il is therefore ordered. adjudced and de-
c5eed e5 y t5s conrt, hat ~ bsR o dlsnsssed at
ants have and recover Of The comm t,nant .h.ir
costs apa charges by them about their defense il
aae pen1n as,i. e1ueaoeo ataonnnne % tas sum Of
execution therefor. 70 which said decision aui
1detnent o. said court the said enters
ns rs eteehuon ana pTays an appeal 70 the supreme
cerditton that tue said conpaalnant shall. within
thirty days from the cate hereof die IN the clerks
once Of teis Coaft bond ln the pentl SUN OF
ase .aoasano aI, oell.'t Wat9 william Mccormick
shsll pay al! costs and charges which shail b. ad
9@e9ea aGainst n1m N eaee euea Judgment shane
:" "WEDxEsS,Ar. Juae q 1ss7
essos d. heeos"'eSs
Walt Ta!cott, Ralph Emerson.
Je,se r., Blirn aud Sylvester AZ ehancets.
MasnvN dtrea.ea VI ''no
The defendants come, BY p. Il. Watson, E.o..
11e eSnGsoh e04 & ana ne the mandate Of tho 50
Court, and drectns that IN o. mp
ibes be had IN sud cause a., according to right and
IA he nad Az .nn :; .oe Gnltsa states ought
said supreme Cont, .dled with said mandata Il,
heIe with, amount to the SUE Of three hundred
Is ordered y The Cours thst The de{enaaet. bsys
execution therefor against said comp!ainant. in
costs f .,s VIZ & ta,a mandate together with the
A. rcror4rieh o,o... 1a
4u'tss oauEe MCLEAN as
MsaG5, - .u' 'o"e' !" a'S fe"asks on the
Manog case:
"Havtrg arrived at the result that there ia m
tbfrinrment Of the plaintiffs patent by tbs de-.
ientant, - charged In the Bill. it il annonnesd
with gsester satisfaction, ae It in no rssnec IN
pairs the right Of tie pialntif. 1e in ist IN III,
seeufed @ At boma nna IN na1ss na' .
fsnosa saisa ssn isas rom a tss 5 20
Stesr o. a. Iaa,a,es a1n ~, ~ snsu o. eatnesee.
co1nies, after stating distinctly that "the
fia'ntm 8 Toooen oiVlder .cas not men," that |
eimilar coEtriyauces had been fprente3 he
Dobbs, PHILIPPE, Amber, Bell, Hussey |
aud schneb1y long before McCormick's pro-
lenueo insenuon' a1ter alsml'stng the whole |
case "!19 COSTS aganst me complainant, !
suoee mclean ola apply this cataplasm to
n's "ounoea pf1oe, THIS vague cordial to his
EXPLODED psetentions. Our space is not
1u4e'en. l4r 1ns puo,lea11on OF the whole Of
fonrd In the :4ur,Icon yr,, p.s;.,. ~
- ocs ~ - a..es ~ - t1a~ A<3"t1' VOL 4,
praphs nf the fditor,s snn,morv ,-s.,,.
tha or,,,on vt;.h ~. ' P.essa"s
., .ne op'n,on' "clcn my psrson, who gives
1a,r and fsithfu1 ernns,.Ion , y, q. 10 DC
- ~ ~>eoe'Iion VI LIE general
=. q1 :,.., -. :,
divider are efforts to acquire monpno1T OF thc
Issspi1g nashiee. s 2! enlste1ne, modifying and
ticusr and Sna ern.gGn . Q. p.s
2 cover principles methods and results ia viols.
naIant ,sws na ~. 4na n ivomea policy Of the
seould tctLtiyau from H. puSle ia
ofta.om t " q nsd;y INK, nas q ad sHset a. s
et1nt ete,s deceat coioT Of ridM 1e'' "'''V'p'*p'
Ihe merit claimed for Mccormick Of being the
sene1ai ME. vas Eho4 fae, teasne te into
luettien. For even II that merit Justly beloaseI
'sef },1 c,fsrs rs aot no tes Ground On vhch The
:hine. And, besiee,, it could only extend TO II.
'a4a, 'ma impsoseaens ep99aea tonsrsa5 ~ prnsipat
hado4o Of anv e7ain, a. inrsmtor,' '''' '04 @7s
The opinion In the Supreme Court went I
wen farther than that OF the Circuit Court
n demolishing AcCormick's claims. We !
luote from 1t one paragraph before taking
eave Of this branch Of the subject: /
Defendant (Manny) does not support his reel 7
,orisc,ts1 a. ~ hesrr D5 Ms ases TIE
be hir rderps1t Of the machine. This deTiee tor
oppobsta1ps tae re-. Va nsensed and used ma9y
I'd no reel most sttnated a. III ratsot 1s.a' -
ountesed none OF the evils 1enedied 6y he chance
~ ~ po.,taon: ~ ~ a..enps 70 trsot Me earlier
1entM Of 3dfeT desiee. to c5ria = daaae4.1fw m nR tt
notoa 70 Ms frsk y an application Of e doctrine
o. To,Sarn;s R.1orss IT, d ~ f"'e'e' oo's''sns
It makes no difference how MANY oocda,a i
lay have been awarded to Mr., McCormfcr t
= national or international fairs. The con G
,ittses make their dec1sfnn MN, +ba ~, I