The Weekly Perrysburg journal. [volume] (Perrysburg, O. [Ohio]) 1861-1???, 1864-03-30
NEW ADVERTISEMENTS.
Legal Notice

AeHuA NothCes ~ a
William flIdoel, ssrabl
Ridopt, Harnct Webb, f
jam j. Coursof, Char.
lotle Courser Coruolia i
n. Couraer and John
hates, Adminiairatof Of g8tt eA
wilHim II. Conrber, De- vVood to,,,nor t,iees
ceased, Plaihtihs, "V'~ N''''''V' ''"''
80 against
David N. McF6rd, byron
Darling, Sarah. Darling, a.....-..t.-
Jerome Darling and An.
tonette Dsrlingg Defen- n EM
1I'HE Defendants, David N, Meiford, Byron Oar.
ling, Sarah Darling, jerome Darling Add
Antoineite Darling. win take notise that the
pialatfs, William Ridout, Sarah Ridout,- Har-
fist Webb, Jane J. Courser, Charlotte Cours-
sr and John Bates, Administrator of William
n. Oourser, deceased, did on the 22d day Of
March, A, D. 1864, 6io their petition IN the
Court of Common Pleas of Wood County, Ohio,
against them the Aforesaid Defendants, and David
NJ MefEord, setting forth that they The Plaintiffs,
are the heirs Of law Of the late William II. Cour-
ser deceased that on or about the LIST day Of July
1884, precise date not now known 70 plaintiffs, said
William II. Courser entered into contract With one
Cyrus Darling, who was then the owner, In fec
simplc, OF said premises, for the purchase Of Out
Lot No. one hundred and seventy mine (I7g) In the
town OF Perrysburg, Wood County, 0hioJ that the
precise terms OF said contract are not now known,
but that taid William ii. Courser entered into pos
said contract and continued in exclusive and undis-
putod possession thereof until The time Of his DEATH
and that ever since that time Plaintiffs as his heirs
at law, have continued In possossi Of said prem
iaes as the owners thereof that said Darling hay
ing failed 10 execute and deliver deed to said
CourseF for said premises, and having removed To
distant part Of the State Of Ohio, seid Courser,
on or about the second Monday in December, l849
caused said premises 10 be bid in for him at a sale
Of the game, Of lands forfeited 10 the State Of
Ohio for non-payment OF taxes, and on the 18th
day Of September, 1859, obtained deed therefor,
from the Auditor Of Wood County, Ohio that after
wards, the precise date not being known 70 Plain
tiffa, the said Courser, being then In actual and
notorious possession Of said premises, claiming IL
tie as aforesaid, said David NJ MefIurd having full
notice thereof surrepttiously went 10 said Darling
and procured from him deed for said premises ,ir-
der which said Mefiord now claims title thereto and
Is endsavorng by legal process TO recover posses
sion thereof; that said Cyrus Darling has long since
deceased, leaving the defendants, Byron Darling
Sarah Darling, jerome Darling and Antoinette
Darling, his only children and heirs at law,
Plaintiffs ask IN said Petition that the said pro.
cecdings, instituted by said Moiford, may bo enjon
cd forever, aud that said Moford bo cnoined from
setting up any claim title to spd premises or any
part thereof and that he be adudged To release and
forever qui claim TO said Plaintiffs all his right
title aud interest Of every description in and 10 said
premises, and that said Defendants, Byron Darling
Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling and AntoinettC
Darling bo directed 10 convey all their right, title
and interest n and to said premises to said Plain
tils. Defendants are notified that they are requir-
ed to appear and answer TO said Petition, on bo
foro the 2Sth day Of May, 1894.
MURRAY e. PRICE,
- Plaintiffs Attorneys.
March 30, 1894 A8f