The Weekly Perrysburg journal. [volume] (Perrysburg, O. [Ohio]) 1861-1???, 1864-04-27

Legal Notice.

William Ridout, SARAH
RidOut, Harriet Webb,
Jane J. Courser, Char
lottc Courser, CornUlia
g. Courser and John .f...
Bates, Administrator Of
William II. Courscr, de- | W., O.. M.
ceased, Plaintiffs, WOW 'o'ilnon rieos'
against
David NJ. Mcnord Byron
Darling, Sarah Darling, H.u.r
jerome Darling aud AM ...
t,iuette Darling, Dcfcn
dants.
| HE Defendants, David NJ. MefTord, Byron Dar-
ling, Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling aud
Antoinette Darling, will take notice that the
plaintiffs, William Ridont, Sarah Ridout, Har-
rict Webb, Jane j. Courser, Charlotte Cours-
or and John Bates, administrators Of William
II. Cuurstr, deceased, did on the 22d day of
March, A. j. 1864, file their petition in the
Court Of Common Pleas of Wood County, Ohio,
against them, the aforesaid Defendants, and David
NJ Meifortl, setting forth that they, the Plaintiffs,
the heirs Of law of the late William II. Cour-
ser, deceased that or about the 1st day Of July
1864 precise date not now known TO plaintiffs, said
William II. Courser entered into contract with one
Cyrus Darling, who was then the owner, in fee
simple of said premises, for the purchase of Out
Lot No. one hundred aud seventy y-nne (l79) in the
town Of PGrTysburg, Wood County, Ohio: that the
precise terms of said contract are not now known,
but that said William H. Courscr entered into pos
session OF SAID promises as owner thereof, under
putcd possession thereof until the time of his death,
and that ever since that time Plaintiffs, as his heirs
at law, have continued in possessi Of said prem
iscs as the owners thereof that said Darling hav
ing failed to execute and deliver deed to said
Ouurscr for said premises, and having removed to
a distant part Uf the State Of Ohio, said Courser,
ON or about the second Monday in December 1919,
caused said premises to be bid in for him a sale
OF the same, of lands forfeited to the State of
Ohio for non payment of taxes, and on the 18TH
day of September, 1852, obtained deed therefor,
from the Auditor of Wood County, Ohio that after
wards, the precise date not being known to Plain
tiils, the said Courser, being then in actual and
notorious possession of said premises, claiming IT,
tie as aforesaid, said David NJ. Mefiord having full
notice thereof, surrcpttiOusy went to said Darling
and procured from him deed for said premises un-
der which said Meiidrd claims title thereto and
is end n 'oring by legal process to possess
sion thereof; that said Cyrus Darling has long since
deceased leaving the defendants, Byron Darling,
Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling and Antoinette
Darling, his only children and heirs at law
Plaintiffs ask in said Petition that the said pro-
cecdngs, instituted by said Meird, may be enioin-
ed forever, and that said Mcfford be enioined from
setting up any claim or title to said premises or any
part thereof and that he be adudged to release and
forever qui claim to said Plaintiffs all his right.
premises and that said Defendants, Byron Darling,
Sarah Darling, Jerome Darling and Antpncttc
Darling be directed to convey all their right title
and interest in and TO said premises to said Plain
tilS Defendants are notified that thov are rcauir-
ed to appear and answer to said Petition, on or be-
fore the 2Sth day of May, 1854
MURRAY g. PRICE,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
March 3O 1861. 4Sf