, 1864-01-16

1EdsE. Tor the eame putQoset oI HolAAu 1otneA
young and good looking. rho had plcad guilty to
he three shop-lttsk-s ~ made the tour Of our
lry goods stores last hll, and were known to the
polIce by various aliases and to every body BY the
ouantitY Of plunder they managed to accumulate.
II will be remembered that when the three were
tried together about four weeks since, the man
Eelf Homes, were convicted and sent to the Peni-
tent!ary the former for ve yeas6 and TIC latter Tor
ore year.
Of Smith. was acquitted by tlle Jury. Subsequent
In shE plead guilty on anothet Of tho numerous
Indictments that were pending oyer her, and 1t was
Dressed her in appropriate language not too harsh,
but showing at once that sympathy for her dis
treeecd situation to which womanhood, eTen when
criminal does not lose all claim, Whlls T. remind,
@ lien sentenced M hcr to the Fenitentiary for the
ct one spe o. asF
th1ee little ehildlen II tho sfinnals 5o3, aad -
sh 10 e @
that some great calamity had befslen their mother,
without pelhaps being nblo to appreciate its ex-
onslratiye fhan that Of their mother, but, under
the Circumstances, not less affecting. Under the
cries Of theee unfortunate beings proceedings
three moments aitcr they had beon taken from the
room, TINT the melancholy 1mprcssions Of the
seems were 80 far removed as to permit tho Court
We cannot help nliuding once more to tho nc.
quittal Of young kaupell, which We briefly noticed
In yesterdays TRIBUNE. He seems to be m In
og party arrested, committed, indicted, and pro
Beeuticn almoet to conviction. On CHARGES Of which
they were perfectly innocent: Faupell had been IN
schmaftz Il Brother, on Randolph street, and after
lst possession q qaaaiii; Of clohing belonging 70
hem Which had tae Gage Per Ee Se
store, The clothing was found In room ut tho
Niagara House, that had been oecnpio4 By Faupeu
and snothef JoIns nan names a. ssnmiat hut
he accounted fos that fact BY saying that at Fau-
pel's request he had permltted the latter 10 put
tle theEe. TO rebnt TIC posittye testimony e, IL of
there was evidence Of Faupell's previous good
character, OF habis that seemed utterly Inconsst
ent with the accueations, and Of iacts !hat might
nraiust this Witness had not the fangs Of the law
pfeyioue1y fastenei On Fuupel1. The result Of the
f1al as te satisfy .hs }ay q ns Gi
i've minutes after tho case was committed to
Red for tho prosecution: Roberts and Assay for
'As serEnioE sS corRr.-"The laws dclar'. is we'll
illustrated in the chancery suit Of eacock Ct ais.
ys yeH Antws ct as nSw t%s Rfsnang eeo1e
III, md tic transactions out VI which the suit
arose, Is iaI back as 1853. At that time neacocx
tnow deccastdl gave mortgage to Van Antwerp
the block on tile northwest corner Of Twelfth md
South Cla1k streets. About tho same time a}udsy-
Ment was obtained against Heacock which became
:: Some Two 80 or three years later Van Antwerp
went into possession Of the property undesa fore
closure, as tic bill alleges. bt ss dclendants claim
by virtue OF a.compTomfBe 4 between himself aud
HEacOCE 60Urh$
ers equity q redemption ii tho said property. 10
upon eaid Judgment. lie put the shozlf's decd
On a'' record, whese It rcmained without attract
s''st .aE ''tSst''n asasR e tsP ss 1ss:
brought in the judgment having also died II
bii ngainst The heirs and desisors Of Van Antwerp
to be- permitted to redeem under the elder Hea-
cocks equity. The main question connected with
ase shi u; g sa aaas
was only On 4 motion (which WAS oTerraled} to lot
in additional testimony that It came up yesterday.
fiom III Appearances, ii may be- another decade BE-
fo.e the matter in controversy is finally settled.
When this fuit begun Morris vas on the Beach;
te fe deenasats @ ' Yasterda5 @ 6a1isoa appeared for
the eompla!nants and Goudy for the defence:
In TIE c1neu1r cor1T-L1rr1scorr ys. BAAA.
GWANAIU-4 ula Nas I'LL HEkItu y! &GPGtAA
brought to recover possession OF boiler and d1-
turea which the defendant agreed to repair for the
plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant
Defendant denied the special contract and claim
cd for actua IN boE and material done and ased In
the repairs. 4 lender ct Sis5 was proved, but
hin, and claimed to hold The boiler By virtue Of
"A An intsfeeting question ras raIssa, as to vheth:
contract, could maintain bis hen for anything,
even though the damages sustained By the m en-.
poyer did not equal the yalue Of the services. The
p%sssd %sIee Tsoas Ts ss palas RaI Ham
for defendant.
6urEn1on Coc1r, Before Chief Justice John II.
'UiFoa, n c1aaetry siaia9.
s,aa IT. :ont;Ined and ,ccIac AAStes 'ep'RA
~ Tls Msriae CO. of Chicago ys. 1sehart ct
Il Fl Ss =, :, Wa. ~ Sam. m a...
amend ansWer an D. to o. taEe fIther ~ proofs over
rnieiI.
~ Sx1s SsIspen6. 6. Hgn SS1'i T. N 1sns Common Lau.
E!G. Underwood y. Konnds: Dismissed a plain
. 81. Solomon M % vs.. Becker et ii. Continued at
risint;f.' q costs On 1f.davit fled.
pt:iss:' ass: Epgeike r.. e. I@Thesd. On trial. ''
ct. McIcsl.cy ys HeaIng. On trial.
Egore IIo1. ~. =. Gary, Common La,o:
ment, $i6Ii.s0.
Tg9.Rg r. RR Rs aso maa n
tic sane having been Irregular and writ Of rers-
CooK CoUNTY ClEoU19 Coun7 -Egors bon. E..
sst-Iippineets r.. BaEagwanath; Verdict for
-: Eenneiv RI. Sweet ct nl. Trial resumed.