The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1864-01-22

might 40 we'll lah Of honest thief OF honest n
lor In The eorts 70 pul down Tho rebellion shoEanae
hives sacrSss oass. So mo a.ors . DO punssSed
for this wanton sacrifice u e7 And shall NE ofspsing
o. sho patriotic victims b required 70 pay mo expenses
Mr. CaAsLEa, (opp) u N. " Inquired Of bis colleague
In what spi5 be would refuse 70 great The epSIns Of
protection o. tho laws. Would his colleague deny 70
Them The right Of iuheYkance7
dren me dlvins influence Of Christianity, AID protect
them iust rs no would Tho children Of the murdered ny
Mr. CnAsLsa said .hsn Inc sAai.s eI tho gentleman
would return upon nimeelf Els colleague would project
The children OF JoJ. Davis.
oy hs shai DO would Eos have replied BE pursued hs
aIgume.sin favor o. me conNscaion Of rebel ssa.es
lion, and they were responsible for the results.
M Roetss, topp.) Of n u, remarked thai when On
wa; 1 < r. ss % n 3. sss Ssn
uton BY The passage Of ho olni resolution now pend
Ing, which was direct coonie. With ne organic law he
agans. she unconstitutional lesslason proposed Hc ex
pressed his belief that there was wiu and cherished
70 override ths constitution and blol the principles of
constitutional liberty, vindscased and maintained By
that they Gould no more conHscase estates beyond
the lie or traitor than they could work attaindeF OF
Ss y e
tho plain provisions Of the constitution Their attempt at
legislation, carried out would drive the people Of shs
and slave negroes Sod stay the hand Of such philap
further proceedings wore taken on the ConAsoa.,sn
bin.
THE EXTERNAL RgyRyUR.
The House resolved itself into Committee OF the Whole
on the annendaIory Internal Revenue bhL ~
Mr. pExDlH1Os. loppl Of Ohio. offered 40 amendment,
SnSn was agreed 70 s0s oil cotton ss me
Mr. Baooss, iopp Of n. y, moved 70 strike out the
duty imposed BY this act upon the cotton used In MANI.
facure shall be satisfactorily shown to have been pre-
Messrs BaooKs, HARniSeroS (opp) Of Ind vooRssSs,
{opp) Of Ind and J. G. ALIEN, topp) Of d. advocated
me os last wo fSsarong suon Y, M g
Moss,s MoaRxr1 (rsp) Of VI, and DAWES, trsp.) Of
proportion OF s taxation ito productions and Industry
Mr.. WAsHBvRrE. participating in the debate, said Iat
Whatever complaints might be uttered in Mr. Voorhees,
district IN Indiana 10 the operation OF those laws there
was no complaint In the loyal district which no (Mr.
washburne) represented His constituents only
willing to pay the preaent tax but ON additional sax 70
crush the rebellion and bang tho traitors me rebellion
Mr. VooaByEs said that such speech as Mr.. Wash.
burne had just delivered did not rise high enough 70
reach honest mans contempt. Wnon the real ovevs
OF country the conservatives their asecndency.
such men as that gentleman win be buried n political
oblivion. The conservative members not 70 DO ~.
undated by loud talk He would not defend the oyaly
Of his district on mere puerile .nsinuation.
Mr. WILSON, (rep.) OF Iowa, replying to Mr. VOORHEES,
about the restoration Of democratic power asked whether
he had forgotten that under the last administration this
Buchanan the men who control Affairs a. Richmond
Was it desired that such party should be res!oredf
Mr. GRISsELL, rep Of lowe, spoke in behalf OF the
farmers ne represented and IN favor OF encouraging man.
ufaCtures.
tlemen insisting that the farmers did not receive just
compensation.
and encouraging AMERICAN industry. In reply 70 Nr.
Voorhees, he said those who have stood BY the country
would mot be sonssnsd % the political SSviSn which the
tonnl flag and the cause Of freedom was driven from
stage or railroad car By indignant soldiers
Mt SrEvEss (rep.) Of Pa, moved that the Committee
Mr.. VOORHEES, clained the floor.
Mr. STEVENS said the subject bad been exhausted and
ss replied Kelley n.. the
word d truth 10 The puDiSs.iOn No. 40 offensive word
said 10 bis bearing. he got on tho car at The place
e wn1cn 70 p.a MS ARE ana osss a was 40 soG
further There must be something more respect
able than came from his slanderins tongue.
Mr. STEVENS said thirty years ago be heard the tarin
question discussed by Southern men, with Calhoun At
their hssd and By Webster aod others on me opposite
said said here ei today. eIsusnier).
Mr. BROOKS had no idea when he offered bis amendment
that 10 would put gentlemen from the East, West and
Northwest in such commotou. His object In submitting
TO raiso revenue, and that the tax should reach
Mr. DAWES asked whether the gentleman would vote TO
tax real estate2
MT. BROOKS Saiu no WOuiu
Mr.. DAWES replied. New England will cooperate with
you.
Mr. BROOKS amendment TO strike out the drawback
provieo was disagreed to.
Mr.. BLAME. (rep.) or Me-, offered on amendment,
which was agreed 10 by small majority, that all spirits
imported prior 70 the passage OF the act shall pay an nd
ditiopai duty Of forty cents.
Mr.. ELIJAH WARD, (opp.) Of N. y, offered an amend
ment that such tax shall not apply 10 epiTs on ship
board. Which was disagreed 20.
The bill, amended, reported 70 the House. when
this and substitute intended 10 be offered by Mr. ste
vens ordered 10 be printed preliminary W fur
Their action on the subject
The Bouse then adjourned.
United states Supreme Court.
Pronsou ct all trustees, &c appellants, the Ia Crosse
aud Milwaukee Railroad Company, the Milwaukee and
Minnesota Railroad Company Ct al, and tho Milwaukee
and Minnesota Railroad Company, appellant vs. James T.
Soutter, survivor OF Greene G Bronson et OIL
Mr.. Justice Nelson delivered the opinion OF the Court
the mcsou for writs Of prohibition n these cases, re-
fusing 10 grant said wris.
No. 10s.hidora Pacheco de Msarin OF al executors Of
Francisco Perez Pacheco, deceased. appeees, vs. the
United states The argument Of this cause was continued
q M weils ior the appslces' and concluded oy MT
Nos. 100 and 341.--Andrcw r. Orchard ct al, appel.
lants John Hughes ux., and A. n. Orchard and
Amanda Orchard, appellants John Hughes and ux.
The argument Of these causes was commenced By Mr.
woolworth for sbe appellants.
United states Court 0f Ola iHss.
WEDNESDAY, Jan. 20 1664.-Tne cases Of John suddsh
vs. the United States Of Felix Argent the United
States OF Richard O. Mason the United states Of
ROBBERS II. Williamson the United States; Of wm T.
Whatley the United States and Of sarah Hoyt she
United States having been this day called on the second
call OF the trial docket and the claimants not appearing
either personally by counsel, the said were
he a. e6a