New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-01-29
LAW INTELLIGENCE.

SUPREME C0URT-cHAnpERs-JAs. 27.-BsicTe Justice
BARNARD
THE Hustled HADEAs CORPUS cAsE--THE CHILD is
PRopUcED-A SCENE IN COURT.
In the matter OF The application OF Amelia A. Hustled for the
custody of her child, Adelaide NJ. Hustled.
In obedience TO the order Of his Honor, the re-
.pondent Peter v Hustled this morning produced the little
girl whose custody sought by tn. mother on this application
OF and on hor appearance In Court pseeu IN ens
The petitioner and N. female f.nd accompanying her
.t.d feeling al sisht of tie child which, 1t viii
be remembered forciby tsien nom tho mother III
Brookyn car sone tmo susr and Ia, no, since e'en
edy loud his Homer ordered the removal Of the hto sI 10
tue private Chambers OF ID. jodgss
Judge Dean before hing his to the return put IN by
the Respondent Tussdy moved that the Ifdsyss attached
thereto be stricken GU; Gs scsneHlous
EsJujge Whiting for The ErsPonden cited the celebrated
hoeein hsbea, copg: case, where Afdayis were Allowed
ard hi, Homer decided 70 be governed by that case
Thereuyon the Counsel for the petitioner then claimed the
right TO attach sda7s to bis traverse which the Ooui
Justice Barnard sisted ths on tn. question q the custody
ofthe ead peEdEs hic be would 10 guided oy eeonvsit
ton with the child provided Of suitable age and eduos
iioa TO make know i;s wishes. 49, =,
EIJudre Whiting hoped that me interview woud be held
IN N. private room and In the presence Of The audience
The Jndr, retired or momon. and his return an
nounccd h!s decision being that tie child should resan
with until tho dson the application vas rem
d,red but that pced in such position thst the
mother m-lt every Saturday between u and o'clock
The re,pon3eu stated h, lie would have The little gil at
the residence OF iricad every Saturday at o'clock
Tho petitioner spped perIon Justice Barnard for Ter
mission 20 tho child before taken away which his
Honor granted.
Tho mother Of IN. little girl followed by Ito grandmother,
two euns and snother lady friend repaired 10 tie adjoining
loom, when scene followed
Ire ht. girl produced by OHce Knish, and We. i'm
rds;sy snAiched BY The mother and the other felstNcs
The child cried loudly for father .nd clurE 10 The n-cs OF
the officer refusing 70 GLOW It's mother take IN her ms
the mother In The OF The isthef saw VIC
the child ia the Judges and enjoyed the sPPsIehy
much coveted interview.
PRACTIcE-EEFEREEs gEroaT-ExCkPTioHS-CoS
FIgMATIOS.
Abbot at American Hard Rubber Co.
In th, seton which have frequently NOTICED h'rersio
fore the mad made his report the single question
submitted "a him IN accordance With The judgment entered
BY in 1851 whether tho property IN eoE2Tt
va. oh more chan <i20G0) not. lie reported TIA.
plaintiff the defendants excepted 10 the report Tho PLAN
tie hreupon confirm thu report and 70 oN@e the
excep,ions and noticed this uaon nonenunsIssd ono
before the sp=cisi Term a. Ch.wberr
When the czled hr. Brady for The cofendan'
objected that the uoon enumerated under the 50:
end and shonld therefore BE- heard ct the speea
fern, n Duane street, q Calendar esnEe-
The plaintiff replied, that the word eIceponf" N HUI
90 only exceptions tria ~ the Issues and ina
The prsetis. stated Ga Belmont Smith II Duor eIt Ue
attn In That where e1ceplions tiled 70 r-ef-s
report eide is.o. question arising aief TIE ias
emit the party a. wbo.s favor the report ~ss nsd- mig
for re Continuation, sSd this ~ss nosFs"D-Isee
motion Al,
IN. question bea new and Of some importance the ssrne<
judge consulted his colleagues IN this da;rci sne announces
III. mo.nnr that al Of them except srsed that ia
motion ne,ted and properly brought pcior'
lin. - ,,,-
Abbott for defr1asn;s w 4. Curtis and James T. brAsy
CuAsnKns-JAN. 28.-BsfoTs Justice BARNARD.
DIVORCE SUIT.
David L. Ples at Justine Files. Divorce rrsntsd