The mountain Democrat., 1864-10-22
Proopeoes aroua . HGlnsr's Pan.

En1roRs DEmocRAT. Happening in the The.
ater, thS plhsF night, thEnagh curiosity b bear
the chs sRA6slsh hIsAd" discourse upnn the
looming man." or, rather, more properl II
GsAts&r AdadpArtIAg ntan. IN speaking qI ils
earlier history Of slavery in the q. 8. she made
the following assertion The Yankee disO,v-
cred by Or IN HE head that slMwey vas un.
proGts6le 10 the North. and then ia his heart
thnt il Was an sbOminniion. She e0nsiderately
neglected tn tell Us what means "tbe YaH
kees' used tn get rid IT II, which Information
! shall endeavor to supplv from my 6Fst PAN
The fsnkee, TO use Der faVOFite phrase,
after having made the shove astoni ishing dis.
coVeFs, bis bFeAat everlasting with philantro-
$is fealiUGs ~~A s=isk;".t y >Sss. I'D IS .h a
I GbotdFRslIon 6ecsuse-dfarx yysdZiE eAs INT
prnhia6le, s0ld bis OegrOes to his Southern
neighbor, coinvd their flesh and blond into
god, put It intu his packet aud then, with
holy horrur, preached against the ain Of slav-
cry He steals the negroea from their mas.
tiers, after selling them and getting their full
value; runs them I'd 90 Canada and freedOm !;
dehes The Constitution of the United States
and the laws made in pursuance thereof,
when tbo-@a1 trWm the South demands the re.
turn Of his fugitive frum labor prAtes about
higher law and persona liberty bills, and nuw
tells the;peUbte tgvute fOr AbVahsm. LiRet,ln
becauae be Is gti5k to free the slaves that he
| (the Yankeel cOuld not Sttal! He r0bs his
aud I'ihs nalle Of liberty eadeavOFa to en-.
slave himt IN ' :. -.
ABOUT AAHRs.'
| 9pme Of the leaders Of the sO-ealled Union
party ars Vesy much exercised about thoss ~ho
are OPpOsed IN The AbOliIionist calling them
selves Democrats. This is very easily ex-
plAined. LiDcOlniIes we'll know that under
their true. name of AbnlitiOnists their party
cannot deceive the peOple, as their sectional
- hma od sltnh a
stencil 10 the nOstFis 0f the masses that the
| very name u unenduFable. They also know
the unenviabIe prestige that belongs to the
glnripns old Democratic psrty. "A guilty con.
science makes the AbOliti0nists ashamed OF
their name, and very naturally induces, them
to try 10 make Democrats ashamed OF their
time e-b"nOred name. Can they do itf think
not As an argument, they say that secesson
lists and sympathiseTs with secessiuu are guiug
tn vote for Mcclellan. II horse thief should
vnte for Lincoln or Mcclellan would it make
either party horse, thieveai Suppose there
should be some symPathisers with secession
vote the Democratic ticket, hOw many "higheF
law" Abolition traitOTs are going to vOte for
Linehlu Every one Of them. Again; does
Il wake any difference who the supporters are.
II the one supported and his principles ara
| right Then let the Democrats follow the ex :
supple set them By Old Hickory, when he swore
By the Eternal ''ihS Union must and shall be
| preserved. ket Bhetn swear oV the Eternal
thas the name aud principles ofthe Democratic
party musi and shall BE- preserved. They "uly
can heal The sectional Wnunds that are now
decorating the hearts of our 0nce united, pros
Pe'Ous and happy couutrymes.
THs (so.cALLED) cxsoS PATTY.
How msuy Democrats are deceived by the
ab0ve name! Would not the name Of Niger
head pariy be more apprpriAte and truthful
They arc willing tn make white men slaves
that negroes may be their equals. lfAny nne
has any doubts about the false assnmp6 60u 0f
che name oF the Union party by the present
Administration party, let him prOpOund 10 any
member II that party the three tIllOwiug QueS-
ii"Os, demanding an snswer yes or mn: ARE
you member III the UniOn party! Did we
ever have but one Union partT! Are you in
favor Of that Cnionl The frst two will al
| WAYS be answered in the affirmative and the
last either no. or "yes, without slavery
thus. eenIrad Ietine themselves in Ihe ~Ams
bsvath, E'r the definite article THs cannot re-
fer I" anv other than the only Uninn We ever
had. which included slavery. Now, JEFF Davis
is in fssur Of the Uoiop. with pr0vi isU 10 sui,
| himAe So there can be Q hundred ar 4
thousand other Union parties in favor If the
Unlon WITH this Hr shal objection to suit them
selves; hHt there cAa be but one THE Uninn
party. and that in favor Of the only Uninn We
ever bad and As the Democratic pirty IS in
| faVOr 0f the Union ~ il was, it is the only
pariy thsH caa trRahfufy Ge called the UHRtn
party. and dety any one to successfully con-
trnv,rt The fact. MISER.
| Hill Side, Oct. 10, 1864.