The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1864-01-31

Casrn1s eH~Sh~-sfehA " Heenon, Tom |
sn Hyaac~n sayrcs and other Celebrities
81 me Fraxs Rane ~ shs Law Csuytes
srNcKs cuAAsEss LolIDor. JAu =
Before ~. Justice sbse.
eusEr Va nns, uxx'aH Arp cr~e
afS : Hcara, Mo attorney on the psri o. kas' VINO,
~ ccnaecied with heenaa sayres, john Tyler 'er'
scea, J. m Macdonald JaMes Mace and Roteri Y ssrs
sse late pr,N night was committed ~ Tic .adharri
oeh q eyssra,ss FOR alleged ercaoh ito peace 20
ahe Ieess sesscue, applied on s.uresy 20 $40
Jrigo for writ or certoyari 10 remove iae 10
csonl aso me Coa,s 81 Qoesns Fs psn or 10 hs sos,
eprss Ass'see dis iosdshp ressr' ed hs dscscn mil
eopsors o. ,hs application, arr Beard rlrded " 40
snSlayit aaae by King, m whtsa tie made tho following
.s'emens He was on Tho ~ o. December committed
q s cshef detendaniu, 49, his na AZ ne sess ons
~ be holden a. teyes On ID stb January ne. but nd
emitted 70 bal ca Me com rlaa, 10. hs, Senan ard zoe
osner eefenGante with % persons assembled and de
,ureeH ne public PEACE the l0.h OF December ne had
been ~, ise and belle ed sa. 10 DID no. 90 zoe sess
r1n reierfea 70 conu AZ breach OF inc peace - ~
teTea ttat the asiico who ccEmca ieen wood 81 on
a an, ~ ouass megsiIes a. ~ ~ preaased
ssscse he bench Of msgissatos % As ia re I.a
pcs Of ana s,so ~ shs nsc.aepts, which
ae ~ished sboud 20 argued ceiore enc O.
5Ssss soa se sls sao g Engage eo@
ess so'e1osne Of her Rajotys sounsel or sergeant
$40 esarso AGAINST sed been the raeect Of mach ds
.cssoo Ac yioaity q the town w which be bad 70
@sss ants some d whom mES. % Summoned on the
ny forlhec that local journals mad commented
ao u be Witnesses soT,se prosscascn wac magistrate
u nc county For these reasons King alleged that he
rrsy5d THAI The Indictment night 90 removed INTO
the sapsr'sr ocsrs The application was made
AND waa naao wisb :oer sanc,ioo. His
.siy Object m making the application was
she trial OF thetraclment Beard hoped learned
Judge, on ahesdsyit he had produced, would grant
vi, CT cotcrer, and thereby prevent the sria taking
place in the county IN which prejudice had been
created and in which he local newspapers bad com
nented on Ne Ee assured ns Iordehp that King
10, whom no appeared had desire 20 delay the pro-
ssedngs, crt only obtain fair trial before ridge OF
Of superior courts either the Circuit the
cenr o. Qcsens Bench. Mr. Justice snee said he should
s e ce.sidsr the matter before hs gave f decision,
His osdshp now granted the application for the wri.
81 oertie-sri and ke indicmen. VIII be shortly removed
Iom The sess al loves where was appointed 20 be
srcd = day.
fircm the London Times, Jan. d.
me has SUSSEX Epiphany Quarter Sessions were cenn
s Duke m i'is lie
s. g. n charles p Mr. Blunt G Yen Ssusows
Mr. g. Darby, Mr.. j. Ellmsn nc After the transaction
douTsops SAID se Wished TO can The attention
she Court 70 the prize tight that had recently taken
court on tho following day to answer for the
part which they had taken in that fight and was not
20 them bu. rather 10 refer 70 those who moved in
6gner e,atcn and had given their counienance and
way company GIioar, hoarS II bad been urged on
behalf Of the Southeastern Railway Company that they
solves Tor that purpose This was true certain ex
aent but II was not the that they bound 70
parties 70
nit burglary at the Earl Of Chichesters residence
Railway company #, with full Knowledge Of the purpose
so- which was sought they should convey the burglars
% detail the circumstances under which che prize
nUhteTs had been conveyed TO and from wadhurst Mr.
parry had done in direct violation Of pledge they
had given the Secretary Of state to the contrary. In
.syDs puriists which stopped between aeadcorn and
ssapehurs TneRchie constable made complaint upon
US subject 10 his report, and communication
sshe Home Secretary who called upon the secretary Of
ne railway company for an s1panssion Of .ns mstisr
company said that the chief constable had simply com
sDed tina, the exerons Of the police had been frus.
rated through the train having stopped between two sta
Mr. oourtbope in continuation. said that he had taken
trouble procure copy Of the correspondence That
had taken place the matter. and should read it, The
soum EASTERN RAILWAY. April rs, 1859.
ea-ln reply to your communication dated the 18th
made BY the chief constable Of the county OF Kent Is to
sbe facilities Afforded BY this company for enabling large
the 9Th Instant beg inform you that the d.
sscors have caused inquiry 70 be made and ascertaned
question were made BY Of Che compapy's
vants without their Knowledge authority, and that
granted 10 future for The above purpose ought also 70
sdd iha. Of the directors, who Is magistrate OF the
lhs notice Of the board and been authorized BY them 20
communicate similar decision the next meeting OF
eSAer Sessions OF the county. have the homer &C. be-
+. wapprScrS, Esq.,, secretary Of State. whienaI.
laid before Mr. secretary sosSsron kascoar.
yo0r letter Of the 25,h inst and am directed by him 10
thank directors Of the Southeastern Railway Com
pny for the explanation they have been 50 good az 70
eve him 2, shs under which ease.
GOWN the line 10 prize lght and 70 express his salts
grant Of such facilities in future am sir your very
s. sNnEs, ESQ.,. Secretary 70 the Southeastern Railway
Company, London Bridge.
II would be seen from this correspondence that the
railway company had given distinct pledge that they
~ss now attempted to qualify ~ thai plsdSs BY
saying TIA, hat, the, the railway ,o company pao merely
90 be stopped between two stations this
sutierfuge Mr., Courthope concluded By moving that
The directors Southeastern Railway Company stat
ins that the magistrates East sussex in Quarter ses
ne occasion OF prize fight AZ wadhurst the 10th Of
December last. facilities had Teen granted BY the
wants Of the TO proceeding ththe and
% request that the directors should take steps
sly facilities being granted 10 future for this purpose
nuncating with the chairman Of the company On the
ect 6u. he thought was neither becoming nor dig
sod for the Court 70 give Judgment 10 what was not
Mr. Darby seconded Mr. courthope,s proposition
Mr. Bestte said did wish to appear there the
representative Of the railway company, but director
Ne desired 70 make some remarks 10 vndicaon Of the
they pursued. After audng 70 several matters
aAvered 20 by Mr. Courthope and previous speakers be
.eAsd with regard 10 the power given 20 railway com
psnies 20 grant special trains that intended
benefit 20 The pablo, and in the matter OF prize
xents was better that such parties should have
- Themselves thaa be crowded into an ordinary pas
sanger train. Railway companies had received com.
snps. and psn sS ' for sss
Esin 70 themselves. with respect 70 Mr. Darbys 1
srd that ,bey ought q refuse e grant ,ces sn
when ~ W. known that the parties were going !
Erize fight, II such the law ought 20 be KNOWN
He would repca, what be had said In letter 70 Mr.
ccurthcps when that gentleman bad consciously informed
I'm that be intended TO bring matter before thai
Court, which 70 the effect that the railway company
having advertised their ordinary trains at specified rates.