The New York herald., 1864-08-07

.ay together by the reroy train at IL so rhos
Mns, porter a. the Midland hotel al iersy SAID .hss
OF june Tue gentleman WAS dressed IN tleas
trousers and had low crowned hat he was "a jockey
looking man" They took q bedroom, dressing room
aud sting room. They aned together and they stay I'd
night ana they weot 10 Ragoy the day a, nat
TINS witness nad since the gentleman ~
iduburg. ami identifed him the Earl of Such and
bad the lady Boun and hid idenuned her Mrs.
Wady John Sadler, AID Mary Pritchiey, chamber
at the no,ol, called give sni'ar evi
deuce, aad 10 that only OF the beds IN tho
rooms by the resDond ut and had
been slept H. Mss Temple, ce Of the petitinner,
prove tnai Mrs tdy arrived at her notners house al
Leamiagtou on the evening OF The 81 81 June C,oss'
x,minet-Mr Waldy Is sixty or sIxty-three
years old lie bad ben MARI led three times before as
marriage to the respondent, He was divorced from ms
second WIFE, To the Judge OrdinAry-lbe Respondent
rather violent her temper, and she aud her nus
band would sonnet mes quarrel but they always maze
~. He treated her very kindly.
rne Rev MIR. wAldy, the nephew OF the petitioner,
proved the receipt OF the letter written by she core
spu undent aud opened by mistake by his wife, ana the
communca ion OF u TO petitioner snd afterwards
from the respondent IN which she wrote,
"For Gods sake say nothing to rum me. ksmemoer
my child"
Mr.. NJ Chambers addressed the jury IN mitigation OF
damages and said tnat the letter OF the respondent
credtabo hm than otherwise, bec use he
appeared to have come q
her tgain sue a married woman He did not
1t the wLea u written she
mad nj seslratod from her husband He was
surprised at the demand for damages considering
scanty and tstactory evidence winch had been
gven a. 10 the terms UPON which the hasoaud and wie
had lived. Even the letters winch had been reod she
oteu spoke OF hun as her scodng husband " ana he ap
peared have let her 60 about aud places OF
amusement by herself II OF tines. OCCASIONS
that ste accidentally met Lord Bucban, who then
stranger T. her and shortly Afterwards she net
hun hote III the manner described by the witnesses.
IL Idle, under the cjrcumsta to call him heart
less deliberate sedncer and very small amount Of
iam would be sufficient compensate tne petitioner
for Zoe loss ne ID sustained
The Judge Ordinary sad the jury probably bad m upt
upon ne quesoo OF adultery and the only other question
vas That OF aamsees In this. as IL many otner cases.
they nad beeo lett very much III the rk as 10 many
bngs which they ought know more about IN order TO
strict Justice No doubt they would be gad TO
xuow Wnat oDportun es Lord Bucntn bad or addressing
lady. There almost every degree of moral tur
pitude 10 these offences against m raj and divine ax.
Nov aud then 81 heitties seduction occur ell, ana
blame the gentleman. All they n this case was
nat lord Buchdp met the respondent at Inc races q
April, nd that May they lnched together at inn
II Darlington. That showed that they we're IN com
RnnicaIion toget her. and they doubt met by ap
poiutmcnt Inc next meeting OF which there was
any evidence that O. the 22d OF June when
they slept together In considering the question o. ,ni
ges they we're entitled 10 look at all the circumstances u
tue Ii usual tor a h lsbaDd who GAINED dam
TO some proof OF terms winch he lived
With his wife, and 10 show what sort OF a home I
winch had beeu broken The letters which mad
been read showed that husband aud THIS case
had lived terms extreme affection ana happiness;
the exception those letters there Ger.
tainy of evidence that point The next
question they had u consider the conduct of the
respondent the onl in MS conduct 10 which he
wou Gall their attenton WIS the ieer written by hm
respondent He looked upon 1t tne letter OF
man who having elected his OBJECT, vas very gad 10
get rid o. his vicm. he seemed to be making excuses
to pick quarrel with her, and be tod her he should
see her sgan. They had evidence before them
TO the respondents circumstances out they were 20
what damages the petitioner entitled without
reference to the respondent OF paying them
The ury after iberatng for about nall hour, re-
turned verdict for the petitioner and assessed the dam
"A