, 1864-06-04

honest judgment fr the cnse, 1por The ltE aud eTi.
s t. BY a1a bin
9s1d to tSe tse be- frta:e se ssys
that he made up bis jqdgnent upon the
amount Of his fee had been determined uoon By
without thought that tie smount, or collection
oy; and ha says that ten do'i4rsa a day was tair
Just. and Ordinary compensation for the services
of Ills deponent as an arbitrator in hat case, and
this deponent further saitb, that his .Eard vas
inside fmpart;ay and faithfully after seYela, We ks
coee ard undivided attention. upon I'll consit.t,-
tlon, and Alter mature deiloeratioa.-that In the
cosdance With the law, and the evidence, and Iva
fair, Jest legal. and equitable disposition Of the
cs:e; and IT is bis fixed opinion, that 40 one with
sItisnt capacity 70 eon.idss and wsiea the testi.
monF IN ttat csse. coald come TO any other cou-
clusfon. cnlcas his mind vas utduly Int fenced by
-partiahty or prejudice.
and examined the aftdav1ts Of J.mes Clmpbe!i,
sn9 the psiat1 on nle IN this cause, and has care
I'll! compared them the one With the other, and
thar the detailed account which the plaintiff In her
ettdATtt processes to give Of the sayings and do
tnss OF the atblttatoss and Of this de2onent after
tue close Of the arguments In the case. Is With
some some Eey ahgh: exceptions, literal copy Of 30
relates to the Eanle eubject that the platntiH was
@ @1ot present1 and could not, IN The Judgment and
inps OF said artitfators, o. what stories, Il any
were tod, nor whether they we're improper, indeii-
cate, Indecent, o. .nntt, and ut beE s@dayitin
u]sIs, and is a;r sample Of thai reckless style Of
testimony, which Was unaffected upon her exami.
nation. as witness upon said reierence, and in
tors fei, compelled to diectedit her.
And this dsponent further e.lsh, that he denies
sg @ ,S asepps ia as ,1S
wsigh said evidence It's bearing aud
effect the eatd Law tesan to repeat and relate any
1umofs q reports whatsoever outside ofthe tes-
sad campbell sought to consider The legal authori
ties cited and the law applicable to said case this
deponent !" would not and did not a.eIstin the ex-
marked, they had nothing to do with said case.''
and he deu,es that he ever made use of any words
70 hst effect and ssys thst ths charge Ihat pei
onghly examine, :eriew and discuss the law and
evidence In enid cast Is absolutely untrue in every
particular and he denies that most ofthe time du
ring the session Of said arbitratosz was spent in
tellnR anecdotee or stories; and he says TINT the
ctarAe that this deponent seemed more intent mp
On set!inE his tses, than y be was in deciding tie
lEte1y unit ne, and ls cruel and outrageous az
ltmpt to Llacken the character OF this dcponent
Eet9re his honorable court, anu is without the
this time, that eald Campbell threatened there
would be trouble II his demand of four hundred
dollars vas Tot not paid. lie eald James Camp
peatedly, That he knew deponent had decided the
caEe honestly, and that ali his rulings questions
Of Law were just and right, md be rezrelted that
tat the difference fopiaiou between them was an
Aunest Que.
This deponent .aye that the inst separation Of
the atbttra1Cfs, On Thnrsday evening, April 25tA,
did net taka plaee witlour uny determination upon
the merits Of said case, but, on the contrary, hB
saysthe majority Of the asbatrators then and there
agreed upon the terma Of said award as 1t was |
made end published, and that before he and Camp
bell finally parted that ereutng, Campbell assented
thereto, directed deponent tonake 1t out sagrted
morning. ......" |
Deponent fnrthtr saith, that the charge that he !
and saiu Lew seemed more Inclined TO laugh and |
Joke, than to seriously and deliberately perform
the duties arbtratots, Ia altogether and graIu-
1ously false, and dcponent taith that at at thefr
third meeting, Campbell well sudssztoed that no
lioned, had tver been paid b. BIZ. LII.
Deponent expressly denics that the reading Of |
hs a!oTezald skstSh M ot aEa:d vas the arst lntina
regard to said case: but, on the contrary ttercof
he sa5s that before then he had distinctly stated to
said Campbell what his only opinion and award
con1d BE-. and be denies that he ever told SAID |
Can peell be had better sign the award, and II he
did LII would pay him four nuudreo dollars or his
lees; and be denies that he uld Ut aay time OF tn
my manner, request said Campbell to efgn that
aHaru.
THIS deponent denies that he e7er stated to said
Campbell that he did not place any reliance upon
usry thereof, he says that BE- did remind h!m that
he pla,nt.fi'e counsel, =. 4. Dow, Esq, admitted
10 the arbitraors that "the defense was terriac;"
md dcpouent says that IN his judgment The pl1tn-
III id "a, to -. I'D Of tl.st defense by her at
tempted .'alibl." Deponeut deoiea that be ever
odd said Campbell thai the evidence Of the plaint1f
md Lii balanced, and says that when said Camp
bell argued that they did so balance, aud ought
therefore 10 he laid out Of the case, this deponent
reminded him that her statements were contra.
1tctcd In many particulars by other witnesses,
xhilst the etitenec ci defendant was corroborated
,ven By como or the plaintiffs witnesses.
Aud this dcponent expressly denies that aafd
~ ard Was made BY him from any corrupt, frau
lulent motive or prejudice whatever. And he de-
lies that twas shaped, declared or deteanIuei 20 /
Is to prove direct indirect personal. pecun!a1y
'cnet's IN any manner Eowsoeger, TO either OF the
.rtitrators who s1gned the same: and that all sug-
,estions insnuations to the contrary are W Oily
nd absolutely untrue. GEORGE A. INGALLS,.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this I'd day
II June. i. D. 1861. WA. L. Cnrncu, Clerk.