, 1864-03-01

consider. II prevailed BY vote Of II to H..
AID Holden mn.ed to reeonsidor tho vote By
which tho second section WAS passed. Carried bJ
Aid. Holdcn moved that the Corporation coun-
sel b eslIed uron TO give his opinion aa to tbs L.
AID. Brown said he had voted for the ordinance
al thc previous meeting or the Council, but he had
since closely examined the bit and WAS compelled
In yeTy many respects nleEal.
A1d. Tsttsworth moved that the whole matter bs
la!d eyer untit ths written opinion OF the Corpora
AID. Cosnisky said the secret OF The opposition;
OF the members to this measure. was tbat ntbcr
corporations were working to retain the monopoly
pnss ssa eGs nfe paa
had called upon Democrats TO vote down this mes
snre % . matter Of party policy. The Blsho2
TO influence The InBh Catholic sentiment nTalnst
It. He believed that the Eighth Ward was Alto
Esiher 1a'afepreseuted by tie Alderman sitting
Aid. ulbrfeb thought the speaker was altogether
too personal. He understood the wants of the
people Of his ward, and should represent them as
Aid. Holden read from lie published proceed!
space of sir months comisky I'D turned ! som. som.
erfanlt onsthe Evaneton railroad question.
AID. Comisky explained TINT be WIS entsapped
into e!gn:ng the report which Aid. Holden lid
read to & ths Council by Ad; Robsrts.
Mv to e3y that be set no traps for Coulsky
The truth was that thern was not d dissentinr
Toice when the report was presented. Everybody
was then opposed 10 the project since 20 vigof-
ously prosecuted by the Evanston Railro.d Com.
Md; Tittavorth insisted upon the passage Of his
AID. Roberts moved to lay tho amendment upon
u tse table. This motion prevailed, by vote OF Is
Tho motion Of AID. Holden then passed unani-
mously: In accordance with this vote, the CoFpo-
ra,1on Counsel gsse his opinion, which was In
10 grant sueh nehse %itoHt % I Az Boa
f.um the Legislature. He held that no such fran
chjee had been granted, either expressly or by iu-
aD9 Il ehs doa2s you'd
hold.
Aid. Holden wished to state that he called On
aue to lin to shst Se ii ia not dese ea1 The
Aldermen TO call for his legal opinion this eve
Md. Roberta moved that tho tlrat report Of the
Judiciary Committee Upon this subject presented
On the 1sth OF January, be indefinitely postponed.
This motion Was subsequently postponed.
aaSe ahe 49, 5acy al
February tst and called tor the previous question.
The motion prevaiIng the question recuIEed up
attached, md on a eli ioF the Ayes and Noes, It
was defeated by the following vote:
g., AyyI,TitsyoHh, Mcdonald, cornIsky, Himrod'
:. Eoa1Hahn, shimp. Roberta, Barrett, Gallup,
kann, Sheridan, Walsh, Abbott, ulbE!eh, CLARK,
ars1 moa9n, W. w ot';n9s.r anIs1 sni1an
TNocaTrsnS' ' ~''@sS|' S~A1'
SiS Pnha,+a ,,ovod :, racore,aar anil Ala a,1,
inn nnnvs5 r. i,V the 1nntion - reconsfdar nnon
thpe tsbic Th;a ,stter 15nt;an nrarsiie3 Re 1ote
~ eafcs All Rnhe,ta ecnrr - IL mo,;nn ~ IN
DEFINITELY postpone tbe report Of ~ tho Judic.1y IN
Comn,iiicTe T Tnrnsentei Dee ". The motion Of AId
Foberts preyajicd. az did also the motion to Iay
upon thc table a motion TO reconsider. Ald. Com
isEy presented ths following dan Of N ofdl
| An ordinance to repeo1 an ordinance concerning
disloyai citi:ens:
/ SEQ. i. lie Il ordained by the Common Counci
of+hn ritz nf (!hfrnen that an nrIjnnocn entitled
an nrdfnance roncsfninr disioyaI citizens. nsasei
| Aucuaf -. ISL. he and The aancis herehy rcnenl
! ed
| SIC This ordinance.sf1sll take effect from AMI
after its passage, Referred to The Committee o.
FGnee Hfe rpco,t ot Tho fo,rn,,tt.s ~ u,.,o, ami
prii~et Iii, The arcn.nnsnvinr ~ nrd5nence m
fhnrfyfnr the itnrinc ~ = cnnrt frono m ~, e
| Plaines 70 the CG1caro River waa fsfen m. AMI
its passage movcds
AID: Noodnan mored tts reference to the COR
Ra9 Ro9n eoonse1 4of LIE op1taon as 10 lie legality
iii fon1,r nored an ad,onrnnent INT
Aid Uojdeu ofIered tbe Following rcsolntions:
Resotr<d, That the police MAGISTRATES Of the ctt,
| OF Chfc,eo be, and thcy oTe hereby. required II
g1rauance oi the power vested Il the Common
Council Of this cftr, under and By virtue OF sectioE
council at its next regular meeting, tho amount o.
| money they, and each of them have taken, de
manded spd received from any person or perron,
sipce they haye held their said offices for or On &C
count Of the iEEuip: Of any city warrant or city
1 Summons for the violation Of any city 0fdtnanse