, 1864-02-10

y holders for the general Improvement Of street.
re dsession Of several Of he questions raised
PEorIE Ex. Rel CAMILLA Mu11ER ". FRED.
ERlcK HAg1uxa AND CATHt2:lsE RAnruHa.--This
was contest for tho custody Of an illesitimate
child ofatout yeArs OF age. and tho herring be-
fore Judge Van H1seins on The return to the writ
ofka,eaS oo,Ea dlselossd Question at iszne be-
ty Who CLAIMS The custody Of the child does 50 on
tEe ground that she Is its mother and is amply able
Tbe PARTIES In POI &c ssion OF The child, clalsa
right 10 its custody the ground That tho mother
dieciy after it's birth gave Them the child on their
consented that they should Do ao., 90.
Having supported the child uncer that stats OF
IN order OF Court The petition alleged that the
petitioner was the mother Of the child, and asked
e4cpnd. @ fhe return admitted lie facts alleged II
he petition, but claimed right to the possession
Of the child for The reasoEs already mentioned.
sbe to taks ot ca9e o tse ese sbn eea
ione4 Jon WAS vas entited I to decison n her fyor' tho
misEions cf the answer, while no proof was Of
fered in support Of reepondent's counter aleSs. r.
s sas 1t r sS $, Psa ae I'll
ssSs sss 'afR nG ssesa tp th'
md even though such parent might consent that
another parry might bring up and control tho
child for indefinite length oi time sttll that per
rigbt aud ar,horityof the parent renewed to their
fullest extent. The Judge however leaned decl-
dedy TO the opinion thai parents gave their chi
becoming @ attached 10 item. theS Ind no Fight al:
s 1s s T. Sn smsS snd sa9 PgrS. 6 t9aR Rs
siae1sng was bound to segaldias Wi w5st Il ailee-
r. petioPe9 Ths cou ns lis
view Of 1t, the case Was dismissed without preju-
dNe,, counsel for petitioner expressing desire
MeComss d Rosenthsl for petitioner Stevenson
fer respondent.
un1gKD STATES CIRCUIT AND p,sEn1cr counr
--B9prs Ao"- Thomas D'unsmosd, .'udg<.-con'-
~. Il. FL Farpam vs Monroe Rule on plaintiff ia
fle additional security for costs. o. show causa
why be should not, in i1fteen days.
3s6. woodward ct a; Ea. The Illinois Central
jury Last evening. e~|- ~ ">
Admiralty.
Company ve. The Proceeds Of schooner Harriet
Ross. Leave to cross-e1amtne ". Il. Windsor.
whose deposition de bene esse has been taken and
filed BY the hbclant herein, upon giving the usual
The Court will reeume the call Of the trial docket
this morning, beginning At case No. g.
SUPERIOR CouRr-B9ors Chief Justice John II.
Is. Ioyd y. a9Fi Wiafd ct a. Dismissed at COM
zos BabeoeE Us. Ho1t ct al. Detaalt and refer
cuce to Master.
$50. uobbio ve. Dupuy ct al. Order confirming
eale.
-. Bel! ct at. va. Lind ct al. Injunction dis
eolgcd bY consent.
Bqore Hon. Tan Z. H1ogins, Judge.- Common
L1W.
Isl. Smith ". Lloyd. Judgment for plaintiff BY
consent
o. TIufse1l vs. Norton ct al. Dismissed at
plai1tif's costs.
Before Hon. Joseph E. Gary. Judge Common
L1sf.
80. Stewart ys. Culver ct al. Dismissed at
plaintiffs costs.
2s1. T1ussell ~. Norton ct al. Same order.
RKcoEpER's Corn1-Befors Hon. E. Tlsn Buren,
JndQe,-CCMn0n LaD.
Gilbert vs. Sherwood. Motion for new trial by
defendant.
ChcHoffp.
Kline 70, klinc- Divorce. Decree entered.
Criminal Cdees.
People r.. Conkight. On trial.
People ve. GTifhn-Larceny. Plea OF not guilty.
People rs- Jennings-Burela1y. Same plea.
People ~. Jupitx-Reccivlng stolen goods. Same
plea.
People rs. Wigcine-Robbery. Same plea.
People vs. Lizzie Males-Larceuy. Verdict Of
guilty..
People IF. Bryan-Larceny. Plea Of not guilty.
People IS, blaek-Assault- Same plea