The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1864-01-31
United States Supreme Court

MONDAY, Jan. 25.-Ns a. Rufus S. Ice Of . plaie sif
in error, Patrick Watson ct al In the Cir
lucky.
Mr. Justice Yield delivered the opinion Of the Court dis
missing this cause for want Of jurisdiction.
No. OF. William IL. D. G. Wright, appellant, gs James
Ellison executor Of Joseph Baker ct al.
Appeal from the Circuit Court OF the United States
the District Of kentucky.
Mr.. Justice swayno.delvered the opinion OF tho Cou
affirming the decree Of the said Circuit Court in this cane
with costs.
NO 100 William NJ. Richardson. plsaia in error, vs.
the United states for lie western District Of
Mr. Justice Grer delivered the opinion OF the Court
granting the motion q tho plantin IN this cause
plaintiff 10 error. VS.. William Patterson
The motion # Mr. paws TO dismiss this cause
ruled.
NO. S1o. William Y, BroNn, plaintiff ia error, vs wr
liam Harrington ct al Ia error to the Circuit Ccurs cf
the United States FOR the District OF Indiana.
Tho writ OF OF the Chcnt Court in this cauA ia
a ~ VS. T M SSis States .yp,,,a vs. Benjamin
s. Hailock, claimant, &c.
This cause was submitted 70 the consideration Q, the
Court On tho sSd and NJ printed gu men ~ NJ '
No ia The United States, appellants We Jose ereto
This cause was argued by Mr. wills for the appel
No. 49, Inocencio Romero OF al. appellants, vs the
This cause was argued by Mr. Garlic for the appellants
aud by Mr.. Black for the appellces
Walker ct al. iutervenors, appellants, vs. the United
states Appeal from the District Gcurs Of tho United
The appeal Of the said District Court in this cause is
affirmed
the United States Appeal from the District Court OF the
United States for the Southern District Of New York
The matters in controversy in this cause having boei
agreed aud settled, II was on motion OF Nj Attorney
General Bates, dismissed.
TUESDAY, Jan. 26.-No. a7.-wm. H. II. G. v ght. ap.
pellant vs. James Ellison executor OF Joseph B,ser
ceased Ell al. Appeal from tho Circuit Court United
States ~ the District Of Columbia.
Mr. Justice Svayne delivered the opinion Oh the court
mi he OF
No lis, The United States, appellants. Manuel
This cause was argued by Mr. Wills Tor the United
No. 49, The United states. appellants. vs.. VIM 8.
johnson ct al
This cause was argued by Mr. Wills FOR the United
No 100 Vicente Miramon.es ct al, heirs &C., apps,
lants, vs.. the United States.
This argued by Mr. McDougai for the appel.
lants and by Mr. Black for the United Sates and admit
ted, printed argumsnt By Mr. bella Tore for the
No. i22 Hiram Clearwater, paintf in ersor, Solo
mon Meredith OF al.
error. and submitted on printed argument by Mr..
Hendricks for the defendants in error.
No 123 Texas Neswanger OF al, plaintiffs 10 error, Vs.
T6is cause was submitted to the consideration OF the
court on the record and printed arguments py Mr. stan
berry the plaintiffs in error and by Mr. Ewing tor the
defcnisnts 10 error.
No 124 The United States, appellants, vs. lose Anto
This cause was argued by Me- wills for The United
States, and by Mr.. J. y. Williams for The appeees
WASHINGTON, Jan. 90, 1854
Case No. l31 win be tho only argued to-day. II IL
tho United States ainst VIM. Carey Jonesthe Cafer-
mia land
SATURDAY, jan 80 1sC4The following causes, coming
frst In order in the Supreme Court OF the Used states
are likely to be argued during next week
No i32-Greenc G. Bronson e. ct appellant, versus the
Lacrosse and Milwaukee Railroad Company e al.
No. 133-Lessee OF George Pomeroy, plaintiff in error
versus the state Bank Of Indiana.
No. 134Henry valettc, &C., appellant versus Greene
G. Bronson &, al.
No. lab-Ihomss 9. Gayor, Jr., AZ appellant, versus
John Kcshsw ei al.
No 1866 The Pacific Mail Steamship Company, plain.
tns 10 error, versus william n Joiite.
United states Court Of Claims.
MONDAY, Jan. 25, 1e64-n the case OF Bathod Scbles
niger ct al the United States Chief Justice Casey de-
vered the opinion Of the court sustaining the demurrer
and Diminishing the petition
Judges Iorng and wlmot delivered separate opinions
concurrng In the result.
The cause OF the city Of Carordelot va the United
States was submitted the printed record and BRIEF
by r. Casscberry, Esq., for the claimant.
The Of Lester and Redngton the United states
submitted on the printed record and briefs by Hon
X. H. Due for the claimants. and Mr. MCPHERSON, the
assistant solicitor, for the United States.
The cases OF John FORESTER the United states or
James Robertson ct a. the United states OF Moses
Taylor and W. W Fox the United States OF the Man.
haitian Company the United states Of N snnott r
vp h. rrnsta Sfnfae ~ II vs. United