New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-12-28

Men-The shove Of nei o.s does not embrace
he ARG sum Lost b. The depreciation Of the currency VINE
the cap u "as invested y the Arnory nor docs ineuu
q. In this account from the debit there is deducted
the whole amount received from the Government A.
. Certainly always deducted in every calculation.
@ Wac MGr5,0n's inventory exhibited 10 the super
vsor,f A. IL Mr. HutchIDgs was there as secre'
nryi Mr. Fields was n another part o. the room Exam
ming Il case; Messrs. PnFdy aud Fly were present;
rcc0llect Mr BuptB calling them up 20 listen wneh
Keen was being examined concerning the various ar,
morcs of the United States Blunt said to themi /
would Ike you 70 get some idea what costs 10 mHAo
guns"
o. Amor Your claim wns paid did you have any inter
view with Brooks, thd patented ifso state what DC
Cured. n,
Collected TO rs having been ruled out when de-
PENDANT offered the same cyidelce)
Nj. Field stated whs, lac expected t' prove IN resaTu
o. the settlement for the royalty.
The Court considered il OF no consequence.
Mr.. Evsrts thought il admissible and tie Court al
lowed il.
Witnes,-The first intimation had aboai the matter
xas O note left a. NV Office from BToots stating that he
had called at nv Office three times without nnG
ing in, and Eo vlshcd me 10 call at Ills ONCE anu
settle his claim went 70 his oice ana Wished 10 hho"
what his claim was: b. showed me statement claim,
ing e. - on $500 guns end g ~ on ooO; repie9
That lhouen HAT vas matter f'r CONSIDERATION 1io
negotiation; Tint orr clnm had been cut down. and II
cOd certainly be for nothing else but guns because the
other matter perfectly apparent. and besides we
really had made no money on the contract u We ;a Ii
woud be the guns which VIC vculd have snose
auenty delivered 81 the 10000; "Well he says you
have got it from ths Government and the ci,y ana you
have got 10 pay me- Zen Two ., t tnie, pS'
was going 20 Go anything further; told hin ltioueh
not OF that basis; II not equitable wanted 70 DO
what was right and fair and asked MN he 1aa mo- MOI
would not settle that way ne world sue u.s. ant;c
pated law.su and reported to Opdykc accordingly
be then asked 20 have meeting ~ his holse had
one spp0inted that evening and three present.
about the same argument was gscui Brooks nnay con
sented to take $1,000; opdyke offered 500 and we
parted on that; Il few weeks after that Brooks called
81 my Office feeling pretty good and said he wanted his
matter closed up and said he would take $500 II
wonld settle it, and he gavo me release
q. How much lac you then PAID the lateLteo alto
getheri A s6 30, including this 5000.
o. Was ths good csrbine. and WA 1t contemplated
to 90 on with the manufacture after the NJ nment OF
. This contract with the Gpye!Lmont' OBJECTED u.
Objection oyerruled. exception takcn) a. We mnde
inquiries in regard TO The desrabcness OF this as gun
for the general trader consulted the best authorities
could hnd-amoLg Others. Lawrence VINO makes
Sharpe. oarbine, and got very high opinion Of II on
him 81 was our idea when bought out Marston, 10
20 on II got further order nom the Government
and axe the gun FOR the trade We also got CONTRACT
With Brooks 10 control H.
y After you bought on. Narsion did yon buy any
Milling machines A. We did: We bought niiln;
machines do the same WORK which cost MaIstOD s29
ard they cost us sJl5
TnY DEATH or M1i. NOYEs.
Nj Field here arose and said that had arrived Al
q stage in the days proceedings when 1t Has proper be
should mention toe death OF " lillian Curtis Moves.
Only last Thursday after trying o cnase N tue Court
above hs came IN and listened 20 this trial On sunday
morning. Will. dressing. he struck with poraiysis
lie was only conscious for iow hours jus enough u
ask the physician hat wac the matter With him, ana
expired Amer er further remarks Mr.. Field moved.
in token OF respect. that tae Court do now adjourn
MI. Eyarts seconded the motion. and added lew
/ remarks eulOeistIc Of the deceased brother.
The Court most heartily responded u all that uas
said respecting the merits ~ Mr.. hOyes and spoke 81
remarkable Argument that the counsel hah t-sGe IA
the Court Of Appeals h. lsb The question 81 sEaIih
bls uses when he Jgdge Masoa thoEght the subject
had been entirely exhausted Oh prior case. Mr..
Eoyos said his Honor became great lnwyer more ny
assiduous and interchangeable application. thsn by any
unusual glfts 0. genins.
AdIouined III to-rrorrop a. 10 o'ciocl.