New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-03-18
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT or COMMON PLFAS-TnnI Tsnn-MAnsn NJ
Before Judge BRADY.
ACTION AGAiSRT TIE CITY-NFGLIGEECR


COURT or COMMON PLFAs-Tnur Trns-MAnsn "
Before Judge BRADY
ACTION Against TIE CITy-SEGIJGESCR
Robert h. bradford Public Admintrator lt The Mayor,
Aldermen and Conmopsiy Of N.wYcrk
| This was IN action for 5000 damages brought
by tire Pubic Adminrra.or in bof o. ' peri o Kin Of
authorize for the benefit Of the widow sud Of t NJ
party whose desb has been caused by the wrongful act;
The psigaa TGIeS that eaIiy tho morning af the 18th
Ql0b., 1851 len speyeI yY,ss man about IS yesp &
ssS 5 wa, TsiH a'1 With i "a 4e ii.
TO business the pgvtmet Il No conner q CIspl .Jei End
cpi,s,cd Into chatn ubOr, forty feet deep Itrsh Tie
.istsnce o Officer Ece- and Priv-- NattNr.n pca-,a,
painful position but found Nur him 10 the pave.
men l' he he'd teen very seouy Injured by the fail re
va. ssep to The Ciy HOital ard there fingered Until the
The plaintiff foIh-r proved that The paveHe, had been
.-.d Of rfSs Sed aP bed ben spry covered ever with
piece. Of ssani and ssIh upon sh tie harFinl had bsn
rotng Of the scsning which left scient supper, for
! the superircumb,ut weight Of earth and stone.
For the plaintiff was urged that wa most shameful snd
asrace instance Of negligence for which The city should be
held liable and ,h,t the question rather othe extent
OF DAMAGES than Of sctp@ responsibility which II was i'm
III. defendants contend tia. there no ses.6oh IN The
o. lesseneo on II: par. ., ,ne ey "a no.
not keeping the s:res repaired and that ths allegations OF @.
cSsq p, -c1rns ~ ere1 seae OWNS
and dish n II f,cs Thrt there proof
Il. defect wa! on. Of ,s. seu, isarsc.eI 10y which DO
Courts had decided hss municipal ecryvraen was not
feet bad bs.n brought home 10 the Corporsoa IN ibis case
II further eon,endct thai Ihoad TIE Jury under tie
: ssis :: sd sss csSr Be- Be- S.a T. bod % Iy . the
lie ass.ased oeas persons fssdsn, .Slo va,
bic and having received ."s being st-y to
bat t. from til. deo~-ed the recovery should Be ioi
III. Bonor jade brady charged tss vi, for the july
sssnoe tho part 81 ue city s .'theush vie Ccpo
ration let nluTeI, 70; ia, is'i.s e .sbory ss3
B. a: to az & ss s.ss a s ~ h.y -, sss
though! the city fault they u sn.te merely the pc
s ~ he seeessa nor ie Si.1. q u. fa
upon b, death eencn,s TO ent into the estimate Of
Inc jury found verdict IN .syor Of tho plaintiff for 81 n
Mets. Shay Richardson fOI Tia pisisNh aea-r- John
SPECIAL TEIS-mArcn, iSos.-Esfafs judge BRADY
BUTTONS WIFE CLAIMING IHSn DowEE EiGUT-coE-
sThUcuos or Tnk sAruhALiziTi os LAWS.
Elizabeth Ba'1 sgt Gs , srsor B He S'ss "a
The plaintiff by this action, seeks 70 have her
Sowr n ss sps wne ii. .
did rence and in which be eird SIC IN ncr com
:, the Church the PsIh OF ST. Martin II tie Yea. County
Q! ddleseI EusGnc the 10th day Of April la2a .od
10 bps tbs csse wilLia the .es Of C0pcss the
.aiio u As ,e having until atrr Buttons death
remained England embraces In heT complaint the following
'.hs abe then was and since I-th been and free
Tn furh.r e,.. tia, wf.u 2 Barton died ,,ized and
inh day o; YobraTy fcD having d-y.-d the 10 the
defendant, The defendants BY thor snsser esnied the
marriage and o. second defense ,e oP he NATURALIZATION Of
srron or lie sh day o, October stc Pennsylvania that
Tho Fhnt Wa seg E.es ever ,9 ,, h1 g,s'asS
therefore entitled drweri5 the land1 Of the esAto5
70 the second defense the plaintiff demuIred aud the mat
Charlss oConOr and H. = Dunnns iO' the plaintiff I'd
muud r. Robinson for the defendants. 49,
Of he United STATE. The oh d-y q Eeornsy the
sp BIZ . s s. Ct % <. G. & . ss.s So
ing the 81 Sa eoad be ecrsrasd "a rears tn actf
residence hss Thai BY eoussfGet'ee Of s- ths rem
T S Of s. s hS .: d H. t .a,d s under tie SC,
Of the Lsy,rre OF tits STATE passed phil 20 1888 the plain
The council FOR the defendants urged s the nie Of t.
law ths, an as. wss not entitled 70 .. Endowed o,
III, .hs. hs paatia did no e9ns Th.n no &C. Of
resided IN OF came the United states
jqtse Brady IN az sAsoIs sgnion es The P1nt. ts.e5
en- IS VIII. rensn Whether rv,de- OF cot, married
petor who at tho time OF the naIiss" citizen OF The
United slet Thus the plaintiff having always bean Al Alien
sna ,ranssr h.d no dover shi And Of her hush.
The dentrr.r sustained The same doctrine was held
G., ~. Supysms Cour, OF hi. State OF General Term Mr. Jus
lice iu.Tshsn pre'ldins
SUPREME COURT-CuAxpEra-MAacn is-Bs;ors
Judge BARNARD.
TIE HATCH DIVORCE CASE.
B.n)smin y. Hatch sat. Cora L. ': Hatch
The motion made on the part OF tho plslntln lor
Conuson 10 Cheaso H. FOR the purpose OF taking tho
testimony OF alleged important vitnessss on behi OF the
plstf residing there the particulars Of which have been
heretofore reported to-day decided tue motion being
granted. H. D. Dana the motion; Bracket Wager
opposed
DECISIONS.
Reuben Ross, IT,, agt. Potter Morris OF al.-Ap-
I proved. The second sofety f. not aosd.
Wyntje l. Gilbert ct a. axt. Gcyrt Smith, Trustee &c.
Motion . deE-0d.
Nary M-gdsicns Rsaf sgt Jacob RssEReport confirmed
Judgment OF divorce granted
Cora L. V. Hatch "a. Benz Frankin E,.eh-CosnDsnon
ordeIe 4 and stay Of proceedings refused
SUPERIOR COURT-spzcIiL TERS-MslcH IL
Before Justice hosCmKz
DHCisIoNS.