New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-10-11

CsYe claimed them Cd James BROOKS did Then, IN
had sct Srn m Bsnss tsd aoyeI, 81 iss
and executed sceoriiggly and 10" James BROOKS
forsd IN nuary bit owing y tte ac, Of his beng seP N
subordinate position 10 was ds-a.l~hed and did not
suit Of Il that m July, 1865 the panc1hp caro- to
end nen u became nee9',sIy to ".Ad aP tue nat
GsC M e' Is ssS ' Sa7 to S' svd ea but
They take H. Mr. Cleric heenpen wen. 70 biz
an, sold There j. ny las, ssIrcn-ut Leie 10 the
md here Is the seeond esree9sn' and want an
scon eone, o, e ,s eoS'1 then s s down sna
posing would be sl right coming froH hrother lawyer,
thoug roaI lie i .s one lfst orarod by Books,
End o HI, ERIK 10 annex il the comp amt NOT the
yer They then presented the eonpent, stating that the
paper conveyed 70 hn one-n Of the whole but
Inc Conveyance Of onesyth of IN" whole they id no,
snnr. James Brooks then swesr' tat he never sid
Of oue.sisth Of wo,hir aud proof 81 i be makes
the assertion that the only paper signed ~ him VA nc con-
he boot would he psodacei Il the entriss IN tho
a. ~ init y s commenced an application ado or ,e
sppon,np o's Receiver end Tie 3teoss' were sppo'n'.d
Receiver BY the Corr IN ArJs 1857 aud 'af'l on we
paper nomnay f,r thc Cous' Or course db AZ or
s write tie brilliant articles that BROOKS had
T. do H. AMI they ~ pne ,he Brool,s Receivers, aud ron
the middle January Receivers rad bud possession o. the
N he h,nls Of the Cou, it hsd dnSni,hed ioF he
hriancy "a before. Tho BROOKS tneu haf re
ths .nres IN tie booss he'd been torn ont Counsel
then road part, Of the answers Of the descendants
stating that tie psiniin La ce over TO-, IN s,cA spsSn
Ia on ana tAcy sal 'ha be- h.dT this pagrole USED The
credit psger aud therfors they c.mei portion OF
those proi. An order otre Conri hsl been ad5 dfcctns
ninq.sy into these p1il Tso vriecs oi 20 partnership
had no st s,.en b,'ns rsoo ~. snb"e no s'iyrniion
giving the fudsn's 4l. 10 81 the pasnn rme or t9i.
tidaag hir frol sasil Ia gny paie business, and ne
jury would DO called upon deiir whether he bad eone
NO. liable for shy h lo.o' AND Thy bed never oh;
ee;cd 20 T. asSos5 they Ens 9 81 u, ,ns ~. .0 a,
9n :ns .se the jury TO decide "'neis reference e
ar Cram teu s.s-J defendant. counsel II they admitted
The document IN his hard tire brst mara
Mr. smyt- for defendant, objected hss this paper bad
beoe appeared the yesinss end could -" no" o'
Mr. Cr,r ..d tb,. pspsr vs.. attached the conplsn,
bv mistake but III. did that the plr'res
,nip SET forth form In papeI A. on, N 70
paper {. which he now offered
Amer some dl.rus.ion Judge Daily decided permit the
pp TO he received in evidence deiendsns tn ~ exc pon
NJ Cram then read the rspo- which follows; at /,
Of ~ o. iTa. Of hr iaeT, Of IA. Ses Yort fTrr,
pap,r tia, he will the lt day Of isuuary iSs .e aud
paper chereby reducing his lao for III.
sum of -iJ5tt r3'% Of winch s'e to De pad oy 'aid
l. s,o .rrrd that for on, year .ad lark. ba have salary
Q: rl,so Dated and 'sr'd " Se~'iO's .cv :, iSs
On the bach was a receipt for the $3.50 The psrner-hP
signed trr 10, Of January so' wa. $40 f,hn
o. oyiis transfer Of on-sith OF the interest CT we
pper and containing the spuiatlons ssns ~ partnership
stephen D. Clarke the plaintiff va, then called and DC
Ia tie under bch In 1885 he becsme part
proprietor Of Tf NsS is's EtP,, ha'sI psyts' Sfss
a,ed that Iapc, slowing The proass Of the concern
We, gwen by tim 10 Jsm.s BROOKE
The ef ndsn' counsel objected TO the eer'en' 't'' psP
NJ Cram u en- asked for the papers.
! 81. Sr,th prodl cd some lspvr-
MIR Cssin-lhe.- are no, al ssi for Az
NJ Meheon-Iho.e srs oil We shall give yon a. present.
Amer cgtf rcucc, h'w'wr enisnt. coans.. proonoeo
lupers. VI which was hsncrd 10 wir-'
w. -- o f.' ss'g beth aSe. Scs .ies BAD been
ru -y en-, away leaving on - s,Iir a; the top with
& ssssu desS.n eoaS. prSdrced soae more
pipcs Az the wi'H.' P.ocee,d se6dFy paper osl nee,
.her.s .nd nal balance. d~@efed ~ nh t'o p.'n n'
M ;" r. sT [ ~, ~, ~ ,ri,l bs,ne. for ID.
the agreement sso-ted Csrs- NOT partner VI Etsr
s.irt than ,ha, traa. Brooks woad nj be dragged into
t 81 he did A. consent, IA. agreement
viii, Jurnr. fr1os. only to- pr ns,,.p C1rse uth Ire
ar" sccordng to lse -s's.e- "a. 80 y os5 s,' is
WIN :. we,f a TO .sy tia, when he entered y,Is
S. g., >. "a, S.,t. svin. b. the oil c,ucen xsai
COVERT ;, due = ,at 10 & eTgs-i irt as's
a''is . -. "a i at.yu .s.o 10 .a5 G, - .ue'sa ra
s6owirs wha. Raj 5s-n r,e di.sar.snrnr,, .sg~ur-.
70 a ea me- Pr q S' ,e:ora 'G I
seI csi!rnru 'iis point VISA svrr snd ss Fi7ii ~
NJ. lrnrs pFep,To 'arnsl Iarnar.ao ss,e.H,,t 80
counting doing by .sirs that De- wiss 10 l..ru
.nFfhr s-i;y .a tae tn; ni-aoEaadgn 10 Aat ut 6
tho pAp~r rs,yni from Bauss borausa 80 uYpos
curr,ci a crpy ,ist ge By 80 's' ton fsn4-i
{, rf. sircks rrurIrt by LIN v.shsg: E~rark md LII
xls flr are. v,LTs bong axe wien Do t- ',,fvi.i
Tie difference between pap'i, ald e. eolr m aoeH!rft
ohicr,ed the question lie sr,ani ih-f question coud
b. -sad reElsctis paper &, a. led y. -f-' n H =
psa,Yg; .r Snyt.s si-o G.kei G,at ."eh rrr- I'll
rbss par rship paper m.-s'd ~ r- faia y /
Of raf nrI. ha Tof D.. sloh Vw'- - p,.~r y /
49, f1rih Net h- lsr's cwn~r. q! t.r Nrr ors
EAps,- Ia the ful .tfto-ssi .assrs hs-r1f, gro
Ari. Ezsus Eroos nr irfi stephen r. isra" rsii
10. whole lrsool ls part hYing ia contradiction u r.
spgr A. thff plain ~ shAgr w" To- cc"-iN
sf c ~ t.l,l. if v-rt u ianei Hfua4s Ihs pr n
r4n,r -.1ad o." M formed. Thy fgy snsit
ihai .f.r ~. document y ..,.d W I'd III. ,isAr
- ia trsrs o. szin af.fo r-rs-. before
ti- November a. 1853 he s-ro ''ng p.rsr 4 tee
owh.s 1as-.litL - iLsss Brooks. .sdf Co. !.
Mr. oFri 3 rc'si TIA. na Court ma tax Ito 6osnu s
ROOD. - dEsntsnts u.ui b. bound ly uaa they
Lad irsr.n Gc1.er scn ioGrt r.; Equity tisi II
isao II Gipuf'i hfNirs TX lerl-r ~
!u'-tcT elss The oi. lat False! cr !uu.sn sra.siN
TIC I:sga ptiou o.yic Ca . u r DO ;his mouns
rGIgig;s.
Hoasst at. ,lslr.'y-My,i.f. d,-i Cd.
b,i0Fu J,st!ro bgAor
Fssac D. findG.l agt Benjamin Harding. .-r.sef 4
uh-,utis rn-. Chiv Ben sfi ioIe.n 80 ,firys OK l
..u-lan In tho m -iisrd Morph! hec,is.e 4 ieAts
~. John Implication 'ouisL
rA,rs ~ mn AZ ffRs-il,Y