, 1864-04-27

Franco and tie Conference.
The following is an eznel translation o. tha note
respecting the Conference forwarded bE Il. Q:os?n
de L HuIs to Prince d. Ia To3r d. Auvcs:.ne. the
Fre1 Oh Entaetedor in Londou:- -
- "PAn1s, March %, 1851.
isPn1scE: The Bfitaon1c Government :s r1sn:
ntw s,ei at 7;e moment 70 bring about the uea:-
ils Gi z Cap:e1Cnte, ald the bclii:trEeat4 do lot
appear o. nnch opposed as previously 10 sae o2e
III; CT ItE Citations Itu are aware th.. We i :7a
Tt s,tjrCt1 t.ke part therein II t1sy
Cd by III tic otter orr, 13a Conv.y th l.
rtnrous O: lie EDperos's Government apoa til
sEhitet. to; ,pu- IN my di.p4sch nt tbs !;;h Q.
fass cn'. Bai ec:ots ae51nE On; se3t It the
LONDON with the fGcas and sentiments we shoaId
bring With us... This perfectly friendly cdmnnuI
ea,on I'll peIEaps sSria'19, T., better than ve haze
}cwed 1y the Imperial Go1rrntnent in the. D mo.
German difference. 1T Will also contribute h5us
TO Eut an end to the suppositlcus Of ul:efi9r o5.
jec;e Nhich have been 80 grataitously attributed
top7: .s.,,.,x. o.;e<,-,. a,., ..,u ...
ci1cation We shall find that We are IL presence Of
to pto eonsnes Te hsve
view to the European balance Of power aad fnY-
nished With the signature of France upon the
r. i bsYe S se
WORK Of the Pienipotcntsa1ies Of 1859. We are far
from dleputfng the wisdom of the combination
which the Trsaty Of London vas l9tend,d to pl4ce
and il, apart from the opposition Of Germany. and
the Manifestations of tho DEches, we were frec to
obey the inspiration Of our traditional Bymp,thes
for Denmark alone. al our efforts would be deyo-
ted to upholdine this agreement. But itis tmnoe-
sible for us not 10 recognize the obstacles which
n,c opposed to the exact and precise execution M
the treats OF 1861. lin the eyes Of nome Pnwers
tie Treaty Of London possesses a separate exist.
ence and peculiar authority. independently Of the
e-gGgeMcntH concluded at the same period he
tween Germa9r and Denmark, tn The opinion Of
Others III on tic contrary, It ia subordinate TO th0se
eng8gemeute, and cannot be separated from therp
Among the German States nome have refused rheir
ndbes:on, or have only sironft In restricted form:
Others, alter hay4u. formerly adhered to It. msy
declare themselves free Finally, the Ge1manic
Confederation appears to dispute the validity Of an
act IN which it hss not coucn1red.
In presence Of this diversity Of opinions, which
will give rise to insurmountable difficulties it np-
pears to me indispensable to examine thc inter-
tsts concerned In the existing war, without nre-
occupying ourselves exclusively with tho letter Of
tho treatY+l
s.TLe caaee, IS vcl1 a. the distinctive character
Of this erngge ID evidently the rivalry Of the pop
national sentiment exists among each, the force Of
which cannot be placed IN doubt. What, then,
would be more natural, in default OF cousse unsu-
tmouely accepted, than tn takn as basis the wish
of the pornlatjonsf This method, conformable to
the veftable interests Of the two partics appears
to us the best fitted to bring about an eqnitsb!o
arrangement, and a. offering guarantees Of stability
In asking the application OF fundamental pfinci.
pie Of our public Law, and in clafminy the adyan.
tages Of this principle for Denmark, as fot Der
many, we believe ne propose the most Just and f.
cile solution Of this question. which excltes such
lively uncssiness throughout the whole Of Europe.
Accept the assurances, &C..