New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-07-18
England.

In the House Of Lords, Monday, July 4, in
reply 10 question by Lord Canricarde, Lord Russell
stated that the PrnSsisn Government had formally
denied the authenciy Of the dispatches recently pub
Lord STAFFORD De Radcliffe said he should ask cues
ton connected it'll this correspondence.
Lord MrlInesbury said he should. on Friday next,
move n resolution on the negotiations in the Conference
It's terIrs are identical with those Of the resolution
asked if the reports Of the action between the Alsbama
and the Kearsarge had drawn the attention OF the
Government 10 the efficiency Of iron chain work as
defensive armour for ships Of war.
The Duke OF Somerset said the Admir- atty two or
three years ago made some experiments with chain
armor which proved that 1t coud not efectuay resist
against steel proectes the ehain-work was no defense
whatever. 49,
IN the House Of Commons, Monday, July T. Mr..
Disrae moved the resolutions Of which be had given
notice and supported them In speech OF considerable
length and Of great power. In bringing the narrative
to close, lie gave summary OF the results "A the Con
ference In which be said: Her Mslcstys Government
had made two considerable propositlons-one the dis
memberment Of Denmark So much for it's integrity
Second that Denmark should be placed nnder The ot
guaranty of the Great Powers which would be fertile
source Of war He asked the House in conclusion,
what it's opinion Of these pr0ceedngsi He Insisted
that the policy pursued BY the Government had resuted
In the pOrtentous consequences indicated In his motion
that Il had lowered the just influence OF England thst
the security for peace had thereby been diminished
aud they must not be allowed 10 escape their response
bty.
The Chancellor Of the Exchequer charged Mr.. Dis
raeli with having earbed and fasihed the meaning Of
the dispatches lie had quoted. He denied that tie foil
ure ther honest efforts had lowered the just igfuence
of England Why did not Mr.. Disraeli use plain Ian
guage lie did not venture 20 adopt the old and con
ttutiOHal form Of vote OF want Of confidence md he
was wise. The House and the country would ho felt
sure approve the conduct OF the Government in these
very difficult negotiations, and would reject toe
motion.
Mr. Newdegate moved se amendment To sub
nit Der Majesty the opinion Of this House that the
independence of Denmark and tie possessions OF that
kingdom the terms proposed by the representatives
Of the norrn Powers IN the recent Conference ought
to be guaranteed" He did not desire that England
should undertake singlehanded 10 engage in war but
that the House should show its readiness 70 cooperate
with our allies before the evil came.
Mr. Kinglake remarked that Mr.. Newdegetes pro-
posal was not only war, but throughout oil time.
War, he contended would be iupolitic 1t was now TOO
late.
On the motion of Mr.. Golden, the debate was ad-
journed.
The Times Of Monday says: The programme for de-
bate a matter always in the hands OF either Coy
eminent Opposition. Any independent member may
throw himself athwart the battlefield, aud compel the
fight 10 take bis course 1t the wish Of her Majes
tvs Ministers 20 meet Mr.. Dsraelis resolution with
decided negative but Mr. KinRake Unexpectedly ocou'
pied the ground with resolution which raised new
Issue There thus, therefore two distinct ques-
tons before The house Mr. Kinglake accordingly
urged 10 withdraw his Amendment in order u leave
the Government the exclusive command Of reply 10 be
made 10 Mr.. Disraen. Mr.. Kinglake wonld not give
wav Il Is needless 10 observe that this IL really
question OF confidence and is understood b. both
supporters and opponents Of Her AaJestys Govern
ment