New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-02-12

The Chamber of Deputies was SUI consider
inc The Address and on the 2eth the debate involved
H. polish quot.ion. VI David supported TIE Oppo.
ton amendment, aud advocated The recognition Of tn
Poles ns bellgoreuts. Amer speeches by other mem
bcrs the amendment was rejected
". Pc.ftan explained tho am, ndmet pf"l@sinf "a
rupture OF diplomatic relations Nth Russia Tie Duke
d. Noruy doonded Russia. aud doosscl nat G0' erL-
rent BE- democratic than the whole ~ Elrop"
Ho oNpi1 Why the Committee desired 10 recon SIC
its syinpaihies Poland With its respect for Russia
and coended that 1t was necessary even in ie inter
Gueront demanded that Poland should not be oItrrm
naicd under Napoleon Ill, afer having been paTii
toned under Ious XIV.
The debate was re. ined on the 9th. " jules Favr'
gvcfn upon the diplomatic eide %. tie Polish qur-t"n
Abiding 10 tho words 81 he Emperor. he pointed ou
tie in-suCce.s Of the negotiation aud urged iLs nece
Sly OF hIc King of an relations witt Russia Boz oIdcr q
the ighs which sLe lad violated. and 20 mani
fe-t the indignation Of the whole Of Eerope lh'
rIOCCt Of Congress was a generous impOssibilliy
ro4mists to make war which would ,, oy in 10 state
LOT Isolation in which France VIA q Er,feut psccdi but
II W.. requisite 10 break oil every kld Of fcbi1n viii
o Power which bad violated the RI ,i'r n treafi'
". Eouher opposed The amendm'iis He defended
TIE COlg res project ith energy and showed thni in
spaN II the profound sympalhi-s Of The GOlcrnmcrt
with Poland i was necessary 10 wat ne solution O,
tho question from time and the moral influence "
Irano" The amendment Wa rejected.
II. Ilerolt supported tlc amendment. d'nagdiu.
the evacuation Of Rome, which ~As rejected ~ %ir
70 -.
Tho cr:lTe draf o. the Address was adopted by -
n julie, Taro is one Of tho deru,lton to carry ~
the Addrtst.
JULES PAyEE oy THg MEXICAN EXHIBITION.
During he debate in the frcurt Corps Leg
slstf on Jan. ~ u. jules Fayre delivered pDWerfl
speech against TIE policy II the Goyernm,ut In Mel.
co The following report contains se principal Pat.
sfc6s.
ave aways been ofoprion that TIE Mexican .,pe.
alton would give rise 20 serious enbarrassmeuts. and
none u the taci- since realized have gwen ground iof
different conclusion.
inquire phetler We could or could uot have avoided
war N 1861; but ! viii beg The Government toupy
de ucty a. the following question: Il il not true q nj
70 tie time when our Charge IA flares IN McI 90 wa.
signaling tie nisdccds 81 which our coantrymc Lad
been tie victims and Invoking The pl0t.c tou 4 Hfuft g.
Al iuhuencethat OF the re lean euigrnnt who have
taken refuge on he French soi-"as making itself e.t
Isit Tot tn, 'hn, taking their own dreams fr p,,.
abilities. they announced that the mere appearauc.
Of of soldiers an energetic reaction would be- urogcd
Boz -,icRle0 by favor OF which monarchy. akin h. our
own mi GIT easily De raised II the Ncw ord 10 pr0pa.
gate therein our principles Dud inrur,cef A
dream not ent1eiy devoid Of grandeur, but stll q
dream WeD then, is il not true that the Trench
Government placed these cnigrths directly undo. our
protection, 80 % 10 APPEAR to Transact ~ csa IA their
| o -Lalff
And DO. Only did the French Goyernmer,l.nd nm ea-
20 these suggestions but the Mexican emiyauts be- s
onr Intentions could be- known In Europe. had already
opened communications with The ATchluke Ma,.ul.
ian. ak the Government II IT was aware oi fist
iact' IL Involves serious Tespongiby fnr ii T. L.
realize such projects these that the blood and e,.
uTe Of france have been lded. tAdlegGb from
! some benohos.l The GOycrlmcbt should also vne us
information aVOrt the nosoiions win iho House Of
Austria
| Has tie Austrian Government approved o. tle.,
projects for the responsibility 81 the French Go,.ro.
neBt begins at the point wher. these negotiations nnd
mis- protection, which W. cannot now dhaynW ,yitl
honor iIst commenced. APPLAUSE Attemps mado
by great sio!cs 10 effect radical changes IL t.o bop o
weaker ones are condemned by the law If ugions ANA
by al homes. ana impartial minds. We ~ l-n. II
The tine OF tie debate Or the address what Wa taking
Place.
We foTessw rcsl 'nisoItunes arising from III, rre
ti0n that had ben decided on; We demanded hni
should he InteveDtioa ia The bone aarr Of MrY c
but simply claim put IA !OT Iepatoiion Of wr0uys IL
IL my belief that many oI thOso VINO voted apat r
amendment IA cGa nov 10 regret iLyt Tho.
has been deviation from this simple policy. tut in
lr69 expressed our dstIlis aH1 we informed the
Government that certain rlnof5 had reached us leadn
- 10 think tbst the question Of Austrian can did
MAS already on The taps. dissent
If yc1 dispute !bis near The words OF The late VI BIZ
lfut Here the speaker read "a passage from FUee,h
Of st gentleman 10 the effect that report lsyaC got
abroad that France about 10 place foreign Prince
Oh the Mexican throne. The Minister Of Foreign affair,
had contfhdiced the same j. this clear enough gen.
tcncn II is in fact certnin that this cOnrad tion
Was sent TO tie English and American ENJOYS. And
yet the negotiations had been opened before the leJt
ure OF our trOOps-beiore the Convention OF October
lhdl.
IN The official document you viii find fle whole
scheme. Take the dispatch ADDRESSED On Oct IT, l.5l
b. the Minister Of Foreign Affairs TO our Enha, dor
in London II is suid therein that tho repara o, our
wrongs Bono form the object Of osleDble con.
venti0n OsiensibIe Then there were convent ons
that were ostensible. The dispatch adds that In
presence OF the American crisis Europe might perl
find advantageous opportunity for setting In Moyl
leo Government strong enough 10 retst Internal dt
tOuiiOD.
Is.ola bav. bothIg &c sty TJalce wore villup "