, 1864-06-22
IHE POLICE DIFFICULTY,
The Injunction applied fer By nr. Turtle. not
Crariea-Dteisioz Of the Master
In ChancerJ.

The bogus Superintendent Of Police, the Wes
Side Turtle Of swapping notor1ety, has been foIled
AGAIN, and nuds himself back In tho mud. turned
completely on bis back, and helpless. Ws would
not show EIaoness at knowledge of the fact were
it not that It helpa the 7Im<s ont Of dl1emm7.
That sheet haa been terribly exercieed iately aooqt
oflee. and crying ont th4t too many eooks won!d
freely Their q not much Of split. and On snss
but "one 20 poor to do him reverence"
NJ Woocof1dge the As:ter n cnsnssy o. .se
c dye.sd a.,,d bis ~
to restrain 9. P. Bradley from exercising h1s OH
cial and efficient duties - the legitimate super.
Jonn Ls End q i1e e naf
li,tle chopiallen when be found how eereElously
hte client had mistaken hts course In seeking 70
thf aid q the e Mtah o
Woodbridge In full rs the matter Ia one which hAs
attracted considerable attention. It Is blank
1efrsa Of the Injunction prayed for:
The facts Of this case are somewhat sinple, and
yet they present. to my mind. questions that are
sorncwbat d1n1cu1t of decision, with the compara-
t,,e,y litte llfh. thst h1s been thfown @ 9p9n t6s
exercised the duties Of Superintendent Of Police
Of this city under an appointment, rs alleged made
in the ordinary way, and while exercising the
bers Of tic Common Council, sixteen in number,
presented chasges against him under section .. /
think. Of the city charter (chsp 81 resting to the
Council, but that does moi appeat to be Of any i'm
portapce because this section appoints or provides
that any citizen Of Chicago can present such
ton. lint he Board aj,er rcasonabie notics not
exceeding ten days to he person eharred.hsli pro-
coed to trial and 60 on; 90 that upon the pres
Bosrd OF Poliee to nfoceed IN The tria ater ryinr
the renN,s;te notic! ~ ~ Tnttic III AAA 04Ae'
1t 10 charged IN The bill that the Board in acting
th.t 1Gn ths Iamhers ~ ~ Rnsr1 mi nonsti
tn,inr 1snrnn, afteTnn,ed tn arTnoafe ,ha sntnnr
nf1operi1 convensd. One Of th1 things which the
Board Enid do # nrcnerv ronpene3 ~ ans ,ue
,,cTd Tn,t1e X ~. ~ thsss - s1
hasa 49, paa =, I ~, ~ Ss "1u
.1fs a"9 pela9ns th9s 10 sqEpena nm
!s tes .ae aeaoa =. .uss wv pessGns Nas
sua tha1 X pd ~ nrtez ta
T Theee weie @ The ain a1leeatons of The hi bill % 40
rerned M 81 '1e o''s'na' 7c'oo VI Aoe o"ato as COL
As ub.+ p-6,ev han nrdcr+.ren "a =, p-.a.
1ey Il !, said Wss snnointes Sv 1hs Roa. I tn act
nsher ~ ofce az 81 Ut 'a sem
un1 thot 70 oihes' as VI ngtt oeese ~ ~ esla
ssra est;a1 .n h.a inamsaa ,o++inn
to 05ey him 50 mat aeeerdiag to tss bill! ap
fhe antSnritr a,,d ,,V tcante .ed 9hs
fensnt ~ PoIcc a1a NJ H,aIey ano'hsr 1sq9
That is lie eneot Of the allegation IN he sili.
m nnsutho,fzed iutrusnn. % IL nntmno1tsnt ne
fact renaiIe and he sesms fo he e4a15,an my .n9
~ ths er,ho,-;t4 @ d1a - 4ha Srra.ineae ~
H. n snS M aus 1he2 see m II Q. 70
nrnnn1 so a. - the IT. q " tne eae
IN snrh a cnse 1h.f - the 1a,,,adrS rhs+ .o,.
TO me he nrincins df enitS. shon,a te - t,esne5
n 1hs no,inn VA he ~ ~ po. !. 'a 90
nnanthnnzea II n ne IL. ME H.
~ fhef nnextion r. ~ 41h.t - ~ C. 10 pa.9
Tet "a te eTea ~ '1a st = e.. me sensdy
Mind in fhe msfter '' ~-A's "As N14esNou ns
The renfiemsn - arst.;n tto ,nn1,ca+;o, co,+ai
A eInnIe anfhnritv from Rsrhnrrss f!hsncea.x r.
ncr1s hnt ,hjs sn,horit1 s1 {asa " nuane5 he
nc with thr sama donht resting nn nv n}nd fhsi
haS In fbsr c.sa 1he nhinctso ~ ~ toJ Laa Laa
1hat ibey td nnt Assnna thrt, nornnrsfa u.Ia g.,
The resenn fhfs wns = 1ntfer ~ ngrate ita ~
That Is he fact ahont IN ihis case '4'aSe
nhaso " ~ az ta,s auoas s,ntta. - sao shss: i
sted Aho,o he nen anone+ sasa ~, autnofties
en1e .si- i" 1i,t tSat ~ s1a,J auJ asIs ~. oeen
sa Tt ~, ,,a ~ 1..nr ~ coalo net IL
T. ss1. ~ "ptn uae qool aos femeoy -
zee # con1d ind sa,n. nnhn11tr M 9N,s a,n
.hath ~, Huo a9ae nuiasao1aty ~ tAls pom,
" 1ns,nt e. eon.a e issue ior ne purPose
M 1tna aneh an po'i' hs. rSnt ~ tais 'osM. ao