The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1864-06-14
- rNrELI.IosAN

sfff Cd - y 80 BIT N@FtttN& -
$ ashsr. 0sr ssbsrssssrs " rrmeassr
Aat - paying vi'Aiu three neu'hs ifen /
ale < ,ub.erpi.ea they save 'rsaiy aw s
ess. aaa y paying bsio's sht snd q iAe :
.sar. psyeuiy.fye cents #f
Tia lane Terra e benaiagiea eoan'y !
sesr opened on Tassiay the ~. Hon. !.
Kdlofr. Psssiains Ja5ss. Hoa 3. Z.
sesrs aba Hes Il ". Updsrhia, Assistant
lalses TIE session vss opened wilh pray
= IS Res. james Anasrssn. Tie docket
uas called ana ne frst case for trial vas
Tgaisoa r.. Ifal This VAS % sstion
Il trespas, fer iakias properly in possession
Il cue liillreth Is an execution u Tease
stsas. a Albany, against said liiilfeih--
Tie alleged trespsss vas committed 90 ihe
lith as II August. 1856, ana this suit was /
eommerosl seoa aner Il appears thai IN
tie gear 1856 Hilireih was 10 possession q
5 earn situated ID The sorsh Part of the iesn 1
Il MANCHESTER The defendant. Jasper Vial.
Ael.as a. sheria and having Indemnity from
Pease 1 stone. aitsehed the stock and iarna-
lng lnp'uncnis upon the flrm as the prop
eFiy Of Ail1rc,h tbs plaintiff Benjamin
4 Watson, broneht ,His aelion 10 recover
damages, claiming that the property thus
taken in execution was lis avn aud that
llildp,h vas acting $ hi. agent Pease &
stone, DC real defendants. then cemnenced
suit in cbAneery, and eejainel the pro-
eeedibgs, The Chancellor, on hearing, dis
solved the injunction, anil The Sui, again
proceeded at law. 10 juss tern, isG5. lie
copr, orisred that the defendant psy COSTS Of
cont.aaanee within say days, Or judgement
% b entered for plaintiff a. the next term.
The defendant failed 70 eoaRly with the
/ rule. and judgement was entered for the
plaintiff aud the case continued to the pres-
7 eui term ioT The assessment Of damages. IL
appearing in ey denee thas most Of the prop
cry taken, was purchased by theplaint ID at
the public yandue under the attachment Of
Pease & Stone, the Court nstl ucted the jury
that tho plaintiff was entitled to recover as
damages for the taking Of the articles thus
4 purchased only the amount he had paid for
them at the tale Verdict for plaintiff for
Il S2Is, 43, with costs. y. d. Burton for plain
tiff. A. L. Miner and Daniel Roberts ior
defendant, 0 afsH
A. H. Patterson rs. a. Walker was the
next csee for trial, butwhile the jury wa.
being called, the parties settled
A. P. Grqham U.s. School District No
ii H'iRhaH. This was an action Of assump
sill 10 recover the price for building school
house. II appears that in The summer G
: 1860, committee Of School District 30. 0
made contract with the plaintiff in til
suit, by which he agreed TO putup build
ing for school-ho,isc, 30x40 "a wosiorie
high, and to have il finished III reason Fl
the winter school, 6ar which The defendant
were to pay him the sum o. Z 500 Some 3
the less important particulars concerning ID
construction Of the building had not Ice
: agreed upon by he building commilcc, a
i the time Of the contract. ana we're left 10 b
decided as the work proceeded, Before tn
contract was concluded there had heen tai
about putting up school hopse With post
Of twenty feet IN length, but the buildin
e was finally made with twenty-five feet posts
{ The plaintiff claimed that this was done b
: special directions Of the bailling committe
given 0 time subsequent to the date Of Ii
contract, and claimed additional eompensa
ton for the material and labor thus expend
cd; while the defendants claimed that il wa
+ according t4flie terms Of the original agree
il meut. Tho kndants'furthcrc claimed tia
/. the matefiais used in constructing the build
ing we're not seasoned as required BY the COZ
tract, and that the work was noi done In
= proper manner; aud introduced evidence I
show that the wood work OF the interior ha
shrunk, the pasiering Of the school-rool
: fallen, and the paint upon the out side con
+ Of. The plaintiff introduced evidence tel,
ing to show that this was owing to tie uut
< sual dampness of the season and did not r
n suit from any fault in the tIaierial Or worl
e marship II appeared 10 eyid nee that
r sool as the sehool-room was finished, al
before the building was completed, tie ii
r, triet occupied il for the winter school al
81 had continued to occupy il ever since, whic
II the plaintiff claimed amounted 10 an accep
j. anee Of lhe woik by the defendants. Ii 81
y peareG that the plaintiff had received ps
y from the disiric, 10 the amount Of $780,
a The jury found that The defendants did
= manner snd form contract as claimed ~ 4
5 plaintiff and found verdict for the plant
y ofsi55,pilh costs. Basl& s Wheeler al
y Z. N. Davenport for plaintiff. Miner
Priodls and +. I. Kellogg for defendants
- a. r. GFaiam rss e. L. Hay. n
was an ae,ioa u debt fer rents Of q farm
Z Ninhall. Iteppears that in February, 40
:, this farm Was owi ed BY enc Gleason, wi
" whom the plaintiff Ia this suit made par
contract ieF It's purchase. After receivt
Il ef the plaiaiiifpart u the price. Gleason %
j Ysyed the farm 10 one Horace Is Stevens.
I, TIE Evidence showed that in the spring
- 1851 Stevens leased the farm Of the plain
j, " farol agreeing 70 pay him $50 rsn
h year, md Ia the June following execute
u mortgage q The farm @ the plaintiff u