The Cadiz sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1864-1911, 1864-05-25
Ths "saatOetre" Editor ON "1n-
sudssIgugv Publications..

Ems SSAstWGYTS' EH1e0f ON AA"
jndsciOus" Publications.
The "S,ltpetre Editor of the Cadiz Re
p,sb,icaa attempts to raai us lecture in his
LAST issua on "iyulicicu, and "infamous"
pa5licstionl He was hurt by the big
thing ON I>e," and must have his revenge,
ia denonnciug til, article in the Sentinel in
regard to the "V Volunseer Militia. He at
tompss to Great, the impression that the ar
sicle was written by Mr.. Douahuc, which he
knew to be false when he pcaned it. Mr..
ponahus has no N IRE to do with any article
which appears in tn, Ssltinel unless i, ap.
pears over his own proper signature, than
has Mr. Michael Mcdonnell or Hon. John
A. Bingham with those which appear in the
Repu5licaa, and Mr.. Donahue never knew
of tho article in the .Seatiael until the paper
was issued. The names Of the editors of the
. Sp.titd are printed at the head Of the pa
per, and no editorial appears in it which is
not w4ittsn by ons of them. It is not Gus
tonay with newspapers to publish which
Of tbs editors writes the several articles, but
It Is known that they are written by one Of
thsn. We might, for the qualification Of
Mr.. Hatten sign our names to each article,
If il were tha custom, but as Mr.. Hatton
knew very well who wrote the former article
ana will know very wall who wrote this, we
have concluded to do as we have done in the
past
.We are glad .he eiitor of the Republican
" "stirrei up" Hie paper in the future
will BE- more intesting. For months h, has
no. hal lins of editorial Of his own writing
in his paper He has been content to gull
hi, reader. with improbable stories clipped
from his "loyal " contemporaries. The huge
sto-is7 Of ''rebol atrocities and Copper
head Tnu-ree.ions" have SO disturbed his
nerves that he could not compose himself
long enough to write. Whether he ha, been
: buried in the depth5 Of some dark and dole
ful 5aitna.re' cavern, the victim Of " rebel
atrocity," or has been chained with the
embrace Of Rip Van Wins!e sleep, we are
not informed; Bat he appears to go into
''spasms" az KS wakes, twists and squirms
like ar adder, grow- wrothy from the start,
and tells his real,rs that the article in she
Sea!iaq is 'infamous," AMI 'injuliciou5. u
Him talk Of injudicious publications; he
who so used TO gullDg his readers with false
hools-goald publish the obscene ani filthy
pieoc which appssrei in the Republican a
few weeks ago under the startling caption Of
"A young Unionist imprisoned in a Saltpe-
tre Cave for nine months-his rescue, con-
dition," &c, thinking his readers go entire
y be.eft Of reason as not to understand the
publication. Him talk of "ipjudicious
"infamous" publications.
II, does not attempt to answer the article
--aot he. He knows that the facts contain
ed in it are true and irrefutable. That
article nor this are not intended to stir up
The members Of the National Guard to Ell.
thcr insuvrection Or insubordination. Moth
ing Of the kind was or is thought of. But
as friend of the people, We, as public jour
nalists will tel them when their rights are
iafring,l, point them to the Courts for re-
dress, and mark each new step in the reign
of dosposism now being attempted to be fas-
tened on the people We hope, as he done
us tha Kindness to publish our article in full,
that bis reaiars will read it carefully, and
when they have done 50, We believe thoy
will not think it so Infamous or "injudi-
c:oas Is Mr. Hattoa wisees to make them
beieye.
We arc not alone cur oppoation to
this measure. II is denounced by the men
Of his own party. Wnen the appropriation
was bsing made by Congress 20 pay these
troops sseseral distinguished Abolition lead
ers took occasion to denounce it in the
sttongcst terms. We presume the judi
e;os editor Of the Republican viii soon
danoancs everybody but himself as g infa-
nous
Mr.. Hae, very prominent member Of
his party said:
M. HALk. Il do not want time 10 look
into IL; but / anl opposed to the adoption
lof the resolution. | think it unWiss. |
think our experience in three years of war,
II it has lcarnesi us anything on Garth, has
LEANED ns, IN the first place, that the call
4 Ing out 0f three months men at frst was
an uayise measure, an the calling out of
nine months men was sn unwise measure.
I do not know whether We have had any
six iaodfhs men or NOT. 7,
aavWehsd.s5ms six months men under
asts1, ard think the calling cat of them
was aia uHw;ss snsasure. i think if wepsss
Af,r