New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-03-22


denied by the pnbEo press, and by Judge Woodward
HIMSELF He would assert undoubted authority that
fund Tor eeetoLeering purposes wds raised IN Phlc.
delpha By contractors under the Government one Of
whom paid e.; 900. The fund was wholly made up Dy
contractors who are piunderiDg the Government
Mr.. KrIIgY asked whether his colleague would deny
that Judge Woodward ever used the language.
Mr. STlIEs replied that Il immateral, for II he
did /, was before hosfties had broken out: besides it
was ate conversation and was dissented from oy
the gentlemen who were present at the time " was
made az to the contingency q separation: ..., T.
Mr.. BRoONALL remarked that he was mistaken IN
ing the declaration received without word VI
dissent. More than dssened, and with eonsid
cradle degree Of warmth William Darlington Of West
chester---
Mr.. sInas-Tid my colleague join in the publication
Of what was Maid
Mr. BHooYALL,-I never Published anything except
Oh the stump and any denial OF the truth of
the statement
Mr. STrIR-Then you never read the papers
Mr. MALLORY fIsor. State. Ky) nsked the yeDtloman
where Judge Woodward wanted the dividing line.
ght il not be that he wanted the northern line 10 be
Caiadaf lLaughter.l twas an indefinite s'rt oil con-
verssticn.
Mr. srRvEyB-Judee Woodward wanted 10 90 with
you ard you ought 70 thank him for II.
Mr.. BM0owALL-Judgc Woodward did not want the
Canada line. aud did not want ~ associate with ian
KEGS He entertained opinions similar TO thcse cf the
gentleman nom Kentucky.
Nj MALLORY replied that he had never expressed a
isrespccth opinion ~ the Ynnkcos and he do:cd tho
seMSe'a TO lay hs s g on the rTos and .
that rnnn differed from Judge Woodward
Mr. i.Y simply dcned that no had ever e1'
pressed 81 u:inion in concurrence with Judge Wood
ward as 10 the Yankees. The gentleman had no tight
10 impufe such feeling - him.
Mr. BaooaaII said that Gen. Mcclellan and Judge
Woodward were In political accord.
with Judge Woodward that would be O reason why be
should Also agree with him.
Mr. STILES said II this SANDER not refuted during
thu cnnyaps il waa because il thought worth
DENYING III the Government did not furnish transpor
ta;;on persons 70 home 20 control tie elections tho
amendment could DO no harm. He did not knos the
truth or fasify Of the charge but he did know that
- 90 votes were cast at that election than in any
previous one
Mr. GoocH Cn.. Mass, a member Of tho Commit.
tee the Conduct Of the War, said lie had been IN.
formed BY gentlemen having charge ofthe civilians who
went 10 New Hampshire 10 vote that not single dollar
paid by the Government for transportation Every
civilian gong thither paid his own expenses or they
were unahlu TO do 80, provision was made by their
friends. lie understood the gentleman from Sew-iork
Kernan) charge that tho Committee on the Conduct
81 the War composed Of gentlemen both sides of the
House, Whitowrshing Committee.
Mr.. KEENAN, explained. He desired 10 See commit
too appointed 10 investigate and shat he did not want
to s.,, the subject sent to withdrawing Committee.
lie did not refer the Committee the Conduct Of the
ar In q disiespectful sense.
! Mr. GoocH remarked that the gentleman had ss
much authority for chargingthat private transportation
was paid for BY the Government he had for stigma
thing the Committee on the Conduct Of the War O
whiiewashing Committee. He bad no authority for
had proposed 20 refer this subject to the Committee ON
the Conduct Of the War. but that Committee had not
asked that the subject DO 20 IL for investigation
The gentleman trvn Sew.lork without particle Of
proof charged indirectly which was the meGuest Kind
of charge that the Committee the Conduct Of the
War il a Whitewashing Committee. Tho gentlemans
explanation instead VI helping. Ind hurt him.
Mr.. kERyay reminded the gentleman that the gentle
man hviu Missouri (Ar. Hair, who had charged
rapton on the Treasury Department us TO trade and
trc lad ssd he could prove his cations - b. trua
~ COMMITTEE " as,
refused ard tie resolution referred 10 the Commit
tee on the Conduct OF the War The gentleman from
Missouri said he wished 20 how many would stand
up for the whtewas hpg Committee.
Mr.. Gooru replied that II he Ind been present that
eecasion hc should have made the sne point against
Tho senISmSn Eon Hisss5t ss 'Si 81. safhhiof fe u
following bad example.
Mr. CHAsIER maintained that his colleague was on
titled investigation Of certain fraudulent and Inn
proper Transaction, aud sought nothing moro than
inquiry by thu assertion Of the gentleman from Penn
syyaia II frauds and SANDER; yrs by the Chairman OF
the Committee Of Wsys and Means. who never feiled
10 vent his III humor Gld others Instead OF
full inye,tig atoD the other eide vi the House wanted
10 smut the matter over and thus Up their deeds
VI wrong They dare not bring them TO the light
MI sE mould bo aspnlrS nn% ,hnt the s,se
SANDER .loud be repeated lie now proposed TO put
his colleague Kelley in contact with judge Woodward
AMI caused 10 be read en- extract from TIE PsnRsyira
riaa u: s5l in which Mr.. KELLEY wss called traitor
Oh. gentleman and branded with the guilt II shameless
nconHL :ency aud Hypocrisy And further that when
All kr, BECAME Judge lie forgot the band That raised
him 20 power. and was noisy and impatient dsclaimer
This was the lang 1asr Of Ch Forncy. the Secretary
81 the United states senate now the editor Of the Great
4 Administration and Court Journal. That was what
Bcrney lhuaghl then. God only knew wlnt he thought
now In conclusion &c said II was matter Of notoIiely
that may persons wrre sent home 10 vote. The
presence II 70 many soldiers could be accounted for by
other theory than that they were sent 10 their homes
At the ripensc oi the Government
Mr. KELLY said that his colleagues lnmegtcd father
WHO wss his friend in tho campaign OF 1851 approved
his ac.s and cnngrn ,uated him when receiving a ma
ority Of lgU 90 votes. In spite of the SANDER. The
thor u ile SANDER which biz colleague read Robert
Tycs The present Register Of the Confederate Treas
ui1 1his was the hIrt open acknoe edenient OF sym
nathy with such Rebels. Ho repeated that ho had
eel, ul 10 O00 majority, aud lie would lei the people of
Philadelphia rcfgto the SANDER which had to-day been
Reproduced.
Ir amendment was in keeping with Tylei's ISLANDERS
II "a blow aimed at the wounded and dying 10 pre-
vent civilians IRON proceeding TO administer ~ theif
necessities He was un the field At Anteiain with other
civilians. There was only conveyance 10 the held
and that was Ia POSSESSION %! the Government This
woud exclude from the field pious men aud others who
souilt soOtbs the wounded aud the dying. IL
aulbr oI the charges that civilians had been trans
pOrcd home at the public expense 10 vote, had wins
perd the words Of craven fcoUndrc fearing IN speak
opaly Tor the inlny which must D. coupled with bis
maze.
Ar Kernnn's amendment was after further proceed
in,, reiccted-Yeas. go; Nays, 81.
Mr. HARDH0 (ky) offered IN amendment that no
par OF the money appropriated by this bill shall be ap
pid used for the purpose Of raising negro troops
Dr. ing negro soldiers now In aTms
When the Committee rose this amendment voted
on and rejected by vote Of s Yeas against 81 Nays.
,EAs-Mersrs Aieons, Dawson Dcunisou, Eldrd-e Hard
tRj Morrison Randall pa. Rollins tMo.), Ro Stiles,
Start and Wahsworh.