New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-01-18
law YNYEELrGRNCs.
snr,zr OF COMMON PLEAs-JAs. h'-bsioi' 'aose
CARrozo.
Yax Yxpgrss NEWSPAPER AGAIN


,1.A act lanes Brooke and EISStus Brooks
- sEis case involving the right of the pia'ntiu IN
- In ,h.re In The Ezprs1 newspaper Oh sN'"iu''e
49,, ga, made BY Hsrry A Cram, eohn'ei ioi P'' "
-. Usnrv Hobson sole agent oil fsa A""sP'P'
u. s,v,h a,socisie Counsel With 'onh "'Vho'"
asked M. CIsLa undeT ret seeno' VI '"S
isa 10 proceed? VT. Gram said iuey Tl0''0' -,
n .-.,,es statutes sd5Dg that 1t wss al sNpoVe
80 ar, council on tie other side had any night 20
~ heard. Nj Mas.son opposed me e1eN "-0 a.
i ,h yrocsedlns, based on the ID seeO" %
,,h, SUN ,ys Of 1890 page 2, which proVa'0 'a'
-. q -. r.,sary To- either party 20 asVe Tl.nea', ~
sS rse 10 etr his deposition voiGl.aa ts nj. MO
y In X, 1suner TO che Court II CoSun'on fsSS
- ne csse Of witnesses who bad refused 20 depcse vol
IN "a ~ nov brought 1ato tosst M McAr"A
~ enet ne ct Of 1902 t,estln +ei q u Voael =, 1e
- s 70 la ,hc ,yasss should be brought eo,e tne
g., Joter : osysorih the referee eproo'eo y 's Do"'
Az e1-i9ISs Il va only different ways ofssttins
. thi,g e di3not roe any obiec'ien o proceed
80 Svccd In III, sation Tue Other ide ;~Ss4t =,
Al he aeicy possible sc pes iHsa 'oo sS -, 60 .,
.'ecss .h yoal cad the e lorr e ,hey coslS
r AcGc.n sid be vas no. 70 O. el.'l = c'"'' '-''
~ NoXeoa ssil ife witness was ."oF1 lie would Ioot'
ar cr,n asa'nsoljrctea the counsel IL oh, lie
egy past IN IL. Cst, rs ,sas 90 g pre- protesting
80 Cd sid ;.t question would Eo CONT N vail
az - B,o,n sale agent Of TIE EFye'' Wa 1ben sven
~ e 10 you have reporter taxing down hope
LII A ne more us-;ce han Oh Tie L. eccs ION .i1 rot
ts,e nideprentsi5us mse OF co"n<e 10 e''h '''''H
rints, -. a. o,.,sc, "a r4uo-.ers
a. tIrkeotrt y made I've tsy Lousc l0e. lls'. IA
= ~ CrsIn tes G.tcsc6ea 10 examine ce "..s' - NiAs
80 the Corrt, r.sauH d e tNHs p sIo''-. c--e'
j Dr. 10, s,ca q counsel &c pe TO answer.
~. frsm-De you aeci-e -aswsIils any question
~ Ecasou--I DO
~. Under tie direction Of What counsel 90 you uo
ti1t sDswt.inri
H. Hcbsou--l decline answering sny question
Some pause lsat iullo nni Ire ConTi "e a. ipet,.
~ Cram read 10 tie Cont Tie question: snd hwtfs oh"i
A. said: " J ok your h. cncr 70 comai h.'r. :.
Tie CorrJhere WI evidently be some .Lu1elt upon IT.
fe. not Lear c4a'I g. dsy VIII ht ~ i iicy Toi i
Nj CralN orr bono, nas something % d. win ,ns "
n that i 10 pain aad aiaa ccrteeFt 81 Nct
Les taxes TIE cath refuses Il GIgweT ard goes sway
should have been committed 81 once, except 81 your
aslors suggestion thai Il 90 over 70 hi'ucsy
TIE Court-l VIII mule oder Tor Mondsy Iuornns 70
,,.oy sbv he should aot be pun shed ios cortsHpt
rs.uE proJcssd 70 i os by t1o witness Hoason what
81, thr ure.er aay circulation Of Ths Daily Ep-ti what
"a. HE Gin uston the weekly and etulwtesiy psPef
500. the circulation la been hesesooIo what vs' IL e!
al, ard whether there had been Gny falling a. ~ AS
ss1e6 tu could have been shown L-t "a ceise'tH,e =
4, pocti Of TIC managers of Toe t-,rsf - rn
iou Of TIE D1tv E.rres has fAen fIon about iSOsio
ae4t Geo within he last SIX -chf. some ohtT A'las
Of me- E-Te had subp9ned witnesses TO show ne
and other Gnd ziveitiia
szca.o show that clients and gco hsd refused TO gs
saYerag 70 that paicE account c. - eo5 'sn'Hie-