, 1864-01-07
LAW INTELLIGENCE,
Decision In Tie fase Of Whitney ". JOHN Z,
Hills 4 60.
The Hermann Renevoien+
Association in Court.
RECORD OF CASES IN THE DIFFERENT
LAW COURTS.

us,.a ruol' oooar OF fnf UNITED szATks-casc Of
whitney ct ais. Us. John r. Mills i co.-The ail-
.ssas.n ~esi. nun tne previous nigh standing Of
tn the nns ,ns Occasion o. no little excite
| time of tta orrurrercn II -,-,i, =. -a~st o. &uo
perhaps that thc arat sas,n,n,aa. ~ sapetea -
MstnoraWn and second one subsequently made,
This latter assignment was attacked by credjto;:
bill On the usual f1ound-that of ftond~snd -
| affairu ~ ~. a.. - - tae
aa =. y. nc Ht1a nave slnce taat time been
| n eaance1y. Judge Dtumnond Yesterday gave a
stance was that the cbarpe of s,d 1nsaa ~ - seo
hin ,r,s ,asnst.,ass - y. ao 'unae III Inc
"a. "as unsas1hea os 1oe EVIDENCE ana the ex-
ssa by hs pases .. whss,F sas
ono Snd Assignment wss on The whole satisfactory 50
CIRCUIT couRT.-The Circuit Court was occu-
pied the entire Of yesterday in tho trial Of the case
Of Windett vs. Derundeau. This suit Ia a aort NJ
appeaan to 'ao "ugauon respecting the Curtis
estate when extended through several yeara and
Was finally settled BY a decision Of the Supreme
,nrn,ve5 - that aasa;e .as, Apln; tnc point
f,,n rh.nrerr 1,-ocaa,n1 - ~ s~.ay u eet~
decree 70 ten certain real estate, which had been
u, t.@s+ = Mt l1ner Or Chicago,
ae,e " ~ i"s an5 s 10 am ~ HroTn The
R The
tHnr IL
tha eeoa IT. ,n1nntss g ~ A. me time q
ICY .sd M o. tao parry creating tue
tns IL ,eitee o. Inc 1nsument than 6y obedience to
u aa.s Auu ,cod eoYuensi5 @ olaeted the sac.
~. Ihe !ana 30 sod nuder the decree, brought
M sana aolia1s. euneeqne1!y, an attempt was madE
y suaes se9.es, , IN psaan OF Ms. Curtis then q
ganxs ~ IN Ieaacea to set aside the
fae aie e. n r. MT: Cnrs This attempt was de-
a,nlv y ths 4a Q! t9e ,3na'
5etf Esa Sn1, ~ i5eE 2! nnf ": Mi
and VIC Conducted 9e sase & FL rest Ssa5 ;n
dqshtry IT. yanId;da a1d abillty; " H. s,n,.n. cnn
which, Up Sre q sng tonLs n IN me case
~ ny u @ so!nme o. me !nois reports.
tena nntic ~ - tha s r. MMay lass ~ e.
enns IN II apReaseah u re TaayS % The
~ t1aE pRIat3t tas "e naso peloke caileo ~ 10
Windet 10 resgees H. % a. acon otongnt Gy ~:
and his 81 clients estimation of The value Of bis ser
~ a1s, anonnts
naid hin i've bundrt ioI.a1s anf h-,nS' .rnE HIn
,ss,ia ~ ~ gise u aooat tnoaeano more,
~ nse 1aonsana ooaars as only
f. tNai4 s, III W LOT aelsaees 60 aeuis
tnose Meo nc o1senaTgea iof MS clients on that
H. Winaott produced scveral Of tbe r,.
Of the city y gpen ths stand Yesterday, who were
tssthed meg int m GO Sons1deng 1he smoant involved IN
s iii ihes IL she~ s e ohef ss
eRsns Rsrnsnpps 10 os esen GeI, ,,;nao.
ra f. Fpeem. oa ,sha fase 81 ~ nsefs
re On tag ss sds o. hs
a va NY Anaoune inEolyea WAS smaiD
H. ~ nd H. ~ @ te @ mutual penGnt soee-
Lodge is organised, VIC believe, under the consti-
sort sort oi % aea1 cd Feowship B1 he ruies 81
hsse. ~ eeitat1 WSekly fllPenQ: ue cialned, 11
as 5Gt.en, dha. he became enttied TO the stipend
t9 rivc e I'm S ana that TINS refused
| W sase - W 1aa.
mai Sfa s!etqass u, sa On tas nlhcf mana
hat ,a, nis g s!e1nefs Was not o. disabling nature
iEtslty rse,ent lin from attt ling 70 bis business,
Tint oi aa1oon keeper9 snd that be did uot
throueh tte means become entitled 10 draw npon
self plovislon: Ihis case was az appeal ffom the
Gec3sion Of the Justice, who bad given Judgment
ss pt s s2ns as f. s
2ssot,stioa. 2 ] M ~ 'A' sDaDn DeA''''S@'
The following cases are liable to be called for trial
II nc Circuit ceurt, To-day: IS, All "a Whitney.
q. Campbell ct al vs. Cowles. p, Dare ct al vs.
grant. 70 Pape rs Ed<on. -, sehadkoG - Rus
Il sernR;or 6 a1e copn1uoueh e. a., ,.. the Western
sS &c fsfss
Transportation Company Of Bu6alo, N. r. to re-
States, under tho 18th section Of tho act Of Con
eress Of 1880 providing Tor the removal Of cases
from the Stale to Circuit Courts OF the Upffed
Stafee. Theee suits werc brought in Sertenhcr
Last and service Of The summons was made On An
agent Of The defendants in this CITY. and the de-
feuiapts In ptTycn pleaed 10 the fnrislicfinn of
The Courts, "that as a corporation thew wese
Jurisdiction over them" 70 that pleA pIatutif|s |
reply tse1Tice On the agents o the Western Trans
pertation Company hero under The act OF l85a. and
10 that replication the defendants demnrreI: bur
the demurrer was oserra1ed and decree entered that
defendants should answer oyer, Amer this de- t
cision rhe petition under consideration was h1ed |
and bond given.
The plaintiff, BY Arlington d Dent, eontendcd !
tnat the petition to remove the cause cauaa too
latethatthe plea 10 the jurisdctIon by defendant
and demurrcd to the replication thereto was an |
oP1edydace, and that under the act Of Congress. |