Evansville daily journal. (Evansville, Ind.) 1863-1866, 1864-04-09
Evidently Muadled.

The maudhp efforts of the editOr 81
the Times 10 extricate himself from The
pillorg Of shame in which we have fasten-
ed him, are most pitiable. We have no
desire 70 lay ourselves liable under the
lay against eruslty 70 animals but 81 the
risk 81 doing 80, We cannot resist an ri.
elipation 70 tighten the moose into which
the Smart editor" has become entang-
led We are not surprised that bis own
party have become disgusted With him,
and openly ayow their anxiety to ex-
change BIN for some one who hasn't such
q penehant FOR small glasses Of beer
one who has discretion if not honesty.
Whatever dislike the leaders Of the party
may entertain for the soldiers they do
not desire their only organ TO be under
the control Of . man whose biabbing
prope asitiea 80 frequently brings that
dislike or luminosity 10 the attention Of
the public $40 rosa is their motto.
They cannot tolerate the indisereiioas
Of the beer mug.
The bringing TO light The record Of the
Times editor which ho made for himself
as editor Of the Jacksoaiaa, is only in
ereasihs the disgust of bis party, many
OF whom openly confess that they made
bad investment when thev Imported
him--in fact, that they we're taken iu
and done for It's to be expected that
be will squirm and dodge aud struggle
70 ektricsts himself from the difficulties
in which his indiscrctious have plunged
him bat the.morehe struggles The deeper
hesinksin n miro Of bis own making.
sample OF the manner in which
The editor of tho Times founders, and
ehow wildly be strikes ont, We quote the
following paragraphs from yesterdays
issue
The Journal editois are very much
tiekled, as tickied ns boy that found a
sugar plum. They have found a mares
nest. They quote first what they say is
ga aceouut of a speech Of ours in the
Boonville EH9Hirsf We cannot say
whether It was gafblel or not, for, az
usual The Enquirer was purloined, AS
have been several of our EXCHANGES
among them The New Albany LEDGER
and the Louisville Democrat a copy of
neither Of which papers has reached US
this week. We aope Judge Moore will
send Us copy Of the EaqUissr.of the
week referred to. ~ $500
The Journal then quotes some resolu.
tons which Il says were adopted after a
speech BY us. Sappressio peTi saooesfio
.fetsi, again. The Journal suppresse.
the fact that speeches were also made by
William $. Hall Esq, f. c. Hibben and
William Cassidy in addition to ourstlf.
aud that We were not even on the Com
mittee ON Resolutions.
Here is a muddlel We didn't quote
any resolutions as being adopted, after
the 7vmes Editors Boouville speech
We didn't know that awilham S. Hall,
ESQ., r. G Hibben aud William Cassidy,
in addition 10 ourself made speeches,
beeause-the Enquirer didn't mention the
names Of these gentleman. The Editors
brains must be wool gathering He is
undoubtedly muddled, and has so mixed
up aud eonfounded the Two Democratic
meetings-the one at Boonville this
year S1d the other at Nashville last
yeer-that really he don't seem to know
. ',other from which, and we guess his
readers are in the same fix.
1t was at the Rushville meeting that
speeches were made by the gentlemen
above named "in addition to ourself."
Mi, Sproule may not have been men,
Der Of the committee that presented The
infamous resolutions which we have al
ready copied But that does not matter.
he must have voted for and endorsed
them, because his own paper, the jack
.sosim, says they were UNANIMOUS
LY adopted. This fact disposes of the
not-on-the-commitsee dodge
The Times, however has another
dodge. 1t says We suppressed a portion
of the resolutions adopted at the Rash
County Convention, and copies the fol
lowing, ''to show how much the Democ-
racy of Rush Comfy hate the soldiers.
81 Z. Rssolcsd, That the soldiers in the
field have our wsrmest sympathies, aud
that we viii not withdraw from them the
tenderness aud love which ever pervads
the Christians bosom, in the midst of the
woes and the sorrows of themselves and
ismiliea
We nnhesitatingly assert that in all
The series of resolutions adopted nons
of them were more insulting than the
above, We ask our readers to peruse it
carefully. The soldiers in The Geld have
their "warmest sympathies,' and I'VE
viii not withdraw from them the tender
ness aud love which ever pervade the
Christians bosom." How ehasm;nvi
How could tse miserable eopperheads of
Rush Ceuaty "withdrsw from. the sol.
der the tenderness and love which ever
perxads the CHRISTIANS bosom p l.
there anything IN tbs resolution about
aiding the soldiers their familiss2 Ne.
In the midst of their woes sud sorrows,
they receive the awarmest syupsshies''
Of these patriotic, genereas suakes. MAO
would not withdraw from thea-tAe-s ten
derness aud love which sssE. psrsades the