New-York daily tribune., 1864-04-15
SUPREME COURT-CHAxBgRs-Bef Justice BARsARI
AN INTERESTING DIvOaCE CASE.


DiefenbAch. alias Geo. Dieacnthd.
ThE was one Of series Of actions running
through the federal State, aud County Courts for the last
three yeu. which have eIeed good share Of public in.
terei The matter has been finally pot to fest by decree o.
divorce granted by Justice Barnard favor Of the plaintiff
The defendant for many year, prosperous den, In
this city lie in Germany, and Il ia sad that he In
proven that be married to plaintiff in November 1919 in
~ ETY. and TO anoihsI Mr.. d. In April 100 IN Phadsl
al ~ and resides with her Ia Stuttgart, Germany
LudsS semler for plaintiff John A. semmleT for de-
Before Justice PEoEn.n
ASSAULT o. w0MAS-BAlL REDUCED.
Ann M.sner agt Nichols Lsngion.
This was motion 10 reduce bail on the ground
that excessive The defendant arrested lnd held 70
bat in 5000 ehsrFe Of assault and battery
nsd by him upon the plaintiff The plaintiff nurse in
the Home Frende.. 81 Mulberry The defend
ant wen, there and inquired for hi. mol" The plaintiff
hold Of her knocked hf down and upon her getting up
threw her down flight Of steps and she fei ssnseless
The Judge said the bail high bu, the s,.aut
rgoui ono and II fortunate for the drendAnt that no
hsh tempered present at the time The defendant
had rofn 10 having means and not the policy Of
Tho court. to punish severely IN advance he would reduce the
amount bat that should be the ord. which would teach de-
Mr Busns io motions Moses Fly and J. s. Ritterb,nd o
posed.
DECISIONS.
Geo. A. Schasty agt Mary T.. SchMty. Report
eonhrsied ssd judgment of divorce granted
John D. Cook ast. John 4. Bdwe-Moiion denied There
u no cause Tor delay when the witness present. and sy he
cIamncd the tra. la such stay should never be
granted. II il notw,h!n the policy ~ the Court
The GLASS BALLor-nOXES-COSIRAC OF POLICE
COMMISSIONERS.
jordan L. Mott IT,. ug,. The City Of brooklyn
Action 10 recover for 800 glass ballot-bOxes fur
nhed by SAMUEL C. Jole 10 the Police Commissioners for
the the City Of brooklyn. The defendant made
Tract agreement th Joe but is 10 lie charged, II ALL
under the ,McIopoii.n Police act
Tho plaintiff claims N be the assignee OF loe the snit
coutrolsdby Benjamin Wood He recovered Judgment
inquest Tor about 500 b,ng NJ the rate Of Is each box
Tie df ndant had previously moved IN set dd. the judg-
and the motion denied affidavit that similar
action against the City Of New fok had been successful and
such ac,ioH tie plaintiff recovered the price for
Brooklyn The present motion g., leave the
previous and II leave granted - bring the
nrwed motion. The motion also for irreFpahty in this:
That 'he inquest taken " hen the
h. calendar That The order Tor inquest IN December
1862 became spent and null the final sdouFnmcb Of that
Circuit. -
Ihe motion paper. contain tcside the ordinary affidavit Of
nei special circumstances hdlc sng entire ~ least
partial defense; they show repeated ofer of plaintiff
cept 80 and - boz and that defendant declined g. psy
that sum- after full examination by defendants law
committee.
IN. drdint showed In regard to the suit against the City
York the action tried before Tefaree that plain
H recovered Judgment therein for b6257 81 taat the City
claim In conroyeiy therein settled Controller Haws
for H2g 500 which something less than t9 box The
Cont held s the inquest regular but upon the merits
aside the inquest and Judgment upon the usual terms
B-ebe Dean aud Donohue Tor the plaintiff J. Francis Wal
ton for he defendant