Evansville daily journal. (Evansville, Ind.) 1863-1866, 1864-04-09

b opinion Of every soldier vho reads
ais resolution.
Having disposed Of the sentiusn.sl 5
st US take view Of the practical. I'll.
ouud in the following resolution Of tee
ame series
4 Rcsolcsd- That Cur decision is r.
s7ocabiy taken, and that vs are uzal-
srabiy and iu5exi5ly opposed to the
ia s7sry shspe and fern,
md that ~e are 1uwiIling 10 give
ANOTHER MAX OR ANOTHER
DOLLAR for the support OF this most
unnatural, wicked, and upballowed A0o-
Iition war. +
Alb ny poor soldier, you have cur
'swarmest syrpsthies," uor viii we with
draw from you toe Tenderness and love
which ever pervade the Christians boz
son." but tour decision "a tSTeUocGby
taken We are unwilling TO give
ANOTHER MAN OR ANOTHER
DOLLAR to aid you in carrying On
Htbis most unnatural wicked, and I'M
hallowed abolition war" Are you be. /
set with enemies, pressing you bard on |
every side2 Do they outnamber youf
Are your comrades falling on either
hand overpowered7 Do you need help
Are achievements necessary 10 save
YOU from the horrors Of Libby Prison, or
death upon an unequal battlefield You
have our "warmest sympathies, but ''our
decision is irrevocably take" NOT
ANOTHER MAN"
Are your families at home suffering
for she necessaries Of life7 Are your
children in rags, and hungsring for
bread-are they sick aud diseonsolateY
eve viii not Withdraw from them the ten
derness and love which ever peryade the
Christians bosom, IN the midst Of their
woes and sorrows" but ''our decision IS
IaKEvOCABLY taken" NOT An
OTHER DOLLAR
The insulting hypocrisy manifested
in the seventh resolution Of that interest
ing series, is 50 glazing hat We cannot
avoid the belief that the editor Of the
Times is in some way connected witk
it, paternity. II is so like him it
must be bis child lie may not have
/ been 90 the Committee on Resolutions,
bat we doubt not BIO had much to do
with the resolutions they submitted.
Yes, yesl But the Journal Is guilty Of
=" FORGERY. F" Il said
In april, 1862, h. S. Sproule was
opposed TO the prosecution Of the war
upon any principle
Yes, We said ii and we proved 1t. Why
didn't the Times give It's readers The
proof? We give The proof again Tor fear
its editor may have overlooked il Il is
FROM the Lacksoaiaaof April ls
Der PosrioS. The connersville Times
says that tho JaeksoHidh opcnly sd.
vocatcs a Northwestern Confederaey. e
This is simply untrue We arc for tho
Union, and the whoie Uuiou, if we eau
get il, aud hence hacc Arrays beer op-
posed 20 The inauguration aud preseca-
fiois Of the presetf tcay, believing, with
Judge Douglas, that s. war ia pisuuion,
war is eternal and fnal separations. !"
Failing, however, to gct the xhols
Union, We viii accept the uest best prop.
osition va can obtain, aud 10 this droa1-
fol ezigeney, will cousuii the interests,
welfare aud prosperity Of thar section
with vhich our hopes aud our Affections
arc bound up, keeping always, however,
steadily 10 view the bnsl restoration Of
the Union, or az many OF lie parts a. can
be knit together, after the passions, hA-
tired and preiudices Of the generation
have passed away.
We copy the article 10 full as it ap.
peared in the Jacksoaian It will be
seen from it that z. S, SprOale, the pres
cut Editor of the Times, has always
been opposed to the Inauguration AND
PROSECUTION of the present war.
| There is no qualification to bis ''opposi-
ton He says nothing about its being
aa abolition war He was opposed TO
the inauguration and prosecution Of the
PRESENT war. Hence. We say again
he is opposed to 'the prosecution of the
war upon any principle 10 our form
er article we didn't pretend to give the
above sentence within quotation marks
as a quotation from the Jacksoaiaa, nor
do We now. We gave il as fact de-
dueed from the article which we then copi-
ed in full from the Jaeksonian, and have
laid before our readers again this morn
/ ing We don't blame drowning men
from catching at straws, but We never
heard OF one being saved by q straw.