The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1864-03-10

~ vOsosn Ashs 10 nh Tlaoe, wish 10 recall 70 hH
Yssoec,lon siasemenb which no mado win yeeroct 70
rso Sss
40 federal States wh respect 70 le injuries 10 AnsJi
An Commerce which have been sustained, or which were
s6nniry On The occasion 10 which refer saied--
lam afraid almost edoosiy-thai the correspondence
sS~ssn mo 'I government. and Ie e1sai States,
and that did nos seek for the production Of any,
sOsoepondeuce which could prejudice any question csI
ndeial investigation. The papers for the prodnct
q which sought simply oeme Sns,S , those mhsn
40 enable 20 Judge whether The goserc~en'. had
validated The honor Of the country and fled D
sohle ear reply stated that he unable produce
shc papers lnasmach az 20 10 80 world De " affect
ins ousy SIN pending, adding that his efgya was
by authority o. she law advisers 81 sue crown
ecu'd net OF the tmo defer 20 the authority
varip argemeDt, but did defer to bs sitjou 70 his
BOuse well az 10 the opinions OF the emv ent persops TO
whom he alluded. u IS however, with sorprise that
&ssn from the proceedings Of Inc ohe- House sarla
that, motion having been msde there by an non
vsebe friend Of mine for the prediction Two Of
rsger was fgpfed that document for wni,sh aeRed
Ia this House, and which were Tefase d--lamely the
respondence between her Maesty's oye1nreni he
Uned staeswoud ee laid on The .able Of Zoe House Of
pOamoas. Hear, hesr) his Tv ., may sdd, that
hC1eInmeni did assent Che reduction OF ,be cor
sessrs Ous 10 is prodss can ss no valid
s6octjcn, inaenucn ss ell the papers question are
Vi entirely reefs whether they should should be
published IN the newspapers. Be thas, however ~ il
nay the House Of Comindls decided thai
papoe which II was Desirable 20 Produce. Now, aid
nos ask for these papers with rcepect The papers
Mouse by the colleagues of nobe earl there
wac and never ccsid have been the slightest 90
sion their predecessor lHear) In answer, indeed 10
an able though able than usual speech Of an
honorable and learned friend OF in tie other honse
Who vent very carefully whole argument it
snld behalf Of she government that nal was
aooddea OF time and eoqueDce 10 arguing support OF
Fbe production papers the production Of which
scod have known there could poss bly, have oeen no
ec,on The gentenan, ma! add, WHO MAGE this state
Was other than the Solicitor General whose
authority the LoDie earl OppQae informed
Induced 70 refuse the information for wnich asked
saies pretty clearly EXISTS
between members OF the government (hear. hear)
bound 10 Observe that the case does NOT stand
alone Abon fortnight ago papers were refused in the
other booze 10 connection with the Saxon nasmnch
II ras copieDded their production would he Injurious 10
ibe pubic service vet few days after noble friend OF
mine, having those papers this house had
Mis- moijop granted without the slightest hesitation.
theefore think 1T necessary TO cali mo attention Of the
noble earl 10 the striking divergence in tile statements Of
awo members OF the government, and will put hro
ih@ dcesson-wbener, inasmuch as these papers have
Nson presented to Congress and also promised he
Hose u commons he Is still OF opinion that their pro.
aocton viii be injurious 10 the public service snd also,
N ne changed his opinion whether he can IN
form what has ed since the last discussion 10
euect revelation o. opinion quite as rapid and complete
detention or the steam rams between The
cad Sd Of September (cbeers)
Earl Rutsrr- The statement Of the noble earl woud
10 v0sy striking he had correctly remembered the facts
q the discussion TO which he eludes. Ihc nobe-esr
Aas represented the case SIS had stated that the pro
tucsOe o. ,be correspondence which ailides
h0t~eep NJ. 4dams ard dangerous the prb)s
y ths Attorney General and The law oihcers or the
OOwp. Az re.olect ~, my statement was not tbsi the
production Of the correspondence rs relating TO the
Dated saies and this co0stry would be dansefons
Ahat she Attorney General Of opinion that it's
you'd lead 10 Incomplete discussion in the House
., commons upon partial Information, ard here '
fore would be injurious TO the or the gown ~
Aoarl As secretary Of slate dd NOT feG authorized IN
giving papers to Parliament when the PRINCIPAL law officer
81 the Drown ted their production would he pnrions
IA
Of aA That entirely different statement from thai
though, issre would De some public dagger N Inc gro
suction OF .nose papers. Ths change w'tch has ai..
10 th.,s production. ,Dersive cheers from the cprc.
sion.) il wac not ! who made the objection, but
my honorable and learned friend the Attorney Gene
mi On reconsiderny the matter he told me be
had come 10 the opinion that the papers eoud
be produced not entirely without mischief, but without
NIL abe mischief which he appreheuded The objection Of
sbe Attorney General being waived, my Objection is
waived TOO because have other objection than
which no stated Az the time thank reyg r,dsa.
bic cl ne production Of ose pcpers lo,H hare Va.
sa<soes and conseqGc,,ees Gaca,dto H. because
Il seems 10 10 thought although do remember any
former when II has been thought, that nothing
BE- proper, becoming so Parliamentary as 10
get the whole Of the Crown, and there
by 10 damage the cause OF the Crown in which
a6oy tave pending a court OF law. tHear) With
ssgsrd 10 The other papers referred 10 10y ,he
earl Inc care 10 not quite what he imaenes u to he
tha payers moved and refused in the House Con-
Dops ~ere n once granted in this House TIE fact
sAai when noble friend moved for neral accosn
Of the number OF between the United States ano
abs .c,Itry did 90 ect, and said that there were
tweny vo0mes Of papers already bound End matter for
swety volumes more, the production OF which would be
worry inconvenenl Inc noble earl explained that
~ DID not require Ill the papers he wished TO have
N fae lie: ii the cases rpon which claims had been
1oandtd whether for personal injury or loss OF property
and ! ,hogeh, there nigh, he some convenience, and
Jheye inquired II can he done, and frd the
making out Of the list will take about two months
upwards. ! do propose 10 give more Than that
lht ] 90 no, propose 10 give ibe despa.hes which
were moved Tor IA the House OF Commons except IL
ga,t,ssar case with regard 10 which the noble ear
sipuOf conduct Of the
cnse ~ that Of mate OF merchant vesse who was
Ad rot show proper earnestness requiring the scsseG
psyton 70 be brought 10 trial thought there Ought 70
my, scne wong i should 6e Known, and ,hst fthe
seysnmeni have shown proper activity should ase be
Dnde Gear The course taken In the House OF Commons
asshereore contradictory the which
zaien with regard 70 those papers Neither Is there
sauss objection other papers being prod iced
Wss Eaaae IN account OF the Attorney General and Dot
Ssarl
The Earl o. c,ssAevoS--I wish e call your ordsnips
aiten,Sn 70 matter which think - NOT OF that inhn
tesstnally small character II relates premise ch
understood the noble earl TO have gwen in this House
Hade Ny contained three points. The arst
war re,orn Of caes made onihe american government
sd serr that woata take months 70 draw ~
-arasmosh as believed that i would he contained ~
OF tbe moi on referred 10 the Correspondence N
.As az the saxon and that The noble earl
20 That Cpyrespondence had been previously ASKED
1sr refused he other House Isereore my noble
1rsud las perfectly accurate stating that papers
fus6d II the House Of Commons mad been granted
fser, hear, ialso sske for copy ~ the instructions
v tbo caeof the rhscsloost h2e there will he
eelas W the peedaotion .; these papers.
Bal R,%Ut--I said there 10 whch the
hCbaoari imv;ed 10 toe government ihai tney hat
shvo proper aExety oAtsn injuries done
10 Griish sHd,ie,t. and i rignt, therefore that
whom e,,b ocss started that ths papers sosd be
EvodnCs,f
lne African ssave Trade.
IN tie Pause Of commons /. the .gth ~ Mr. cav
ALod lsYx ~ al tus