, 1864-03-08

on the payment of about $i4'o0o.. Thc
Iadgment here being tor the sane Indebtedness to
curcd By Judgment IN Ere, "a, where ihe % deten-
dant in that suit had property. The property was
cold BY tho administrator, ]. B. F. Russell Ia chi.
It each sale, j. Pcammon, attorney f5f tie jndg-
ncnt, WINS the purchaser, and from him the title I
passed to Vim. u. Ogden, II. D. Ogden, and Alex.
It is now sought to recover BY Tie heirs of Wight
tho ground Of fraud In the sale. The testimony
taken at previous trial IL by consent OF both par
ties to be used In the present cauee The trial will
probably continue three days.
An interesting point was tatsed In the Circuit
Cont ycst rday. A motion WAS made in the d.
yorcc suit of Taught ys Taught, for temporary all
rnonY to enable plaintifr to maintain her action.
The affidavit Of the complainant was presented by
her counsel setting forth the means OF the defend
mt, and praying for money to pay for board at the
rate Of FIVE dollars and lity cents per week and al
lowanee for counsel fees. In support Of her appl-
cation ehe made affidavit Of her complaint by rea-
aon Of the defendants adultery, etc.
The counsel for defendant opposed the motion,
and presented numerous aff1davlts to show that
complainant by reason Of misconduct was reduced
to her present necessity and that che Ia totay un-
dt to be entrusted with the care OF her child, and
opposed the motion further, the ground that tho
current Of authority adverse to the game where
ever By STATUTE authority has been given the Court
to make such provision Of alimony to the complain
.snt. The Court reserved his decision.
In this court an interesting habeds corpus case
hS it, + q bv hs edaS H. as
Ruhr and Anna Ruhr his wife petitioned for the H.
sue OF writ q Aabkas corpus aRo1 the foliow!ns
marrisge, bccsme tho mother d an illegitimate
child called after its put1tive father Camilla Muel-
ler.. This happened IN the Duchy Of Schleswis, in
the Kingdom Of Denmark, In the year 1851 At
hat ffynr thAfnenca
crisk uartune, one Of the respondents, where the
child was born. Harins no home of her own, Anna
Sesdcs be- @ wllat pttance anna was able to e1s fhem,
rom lis putative fathcT: II February, 1858, sbe
condition, and shortly AMER her arrival in New York
married FAM knhr, man Of fair menus mud easy
sircu@stanses. Shortly ntts1 her mssr.ge Anna
for tho child, and Hsrtncy being poor, brought him
and hts wife to Chicago, at an expense Of $4ND.
In took he chiid with III kem' III eisims set up % il
the petition are: That the child ID unlawfnlly re-
strained Of her liberty that its parents and nat
abundantly able to support and educate her; that
shs f. 2ow sing ytaG1s tha .h an EgsRscpsle h l
ungs are poor and unable to properly educate her.
They therefore prayed for the writ, asking the pro-
dnction OF the girl In court:
sxe ee 1n III afs
lived a long lIie in degradation and shame and
| was In hopeless condition bodily and mentally.
Of living virtuous and orderly life in the future.
and out Of christian love aud charity they gave her
food and shelter. Soon after her admission she
birth tho midwife who oticiated said that Anna
saFc the child 90 BON, TO them, they being child
lesf, and that Anna inSoksd the blessings u q Al.
In accepting The child known as Camilla Mueller;
The legal forms in aeeordance with the custom oi
entitled 10 tic custody and tuteiass Of lie cd
They further answered that Anna subsequently re:
apsed into vile habits and led life OF shame and
which caused them to forbid her the house.
By the laws Of the DaehS Of schlesWls; the TO "a.
man Rnhs IL not entitled 9 e. tne custody OF e hes
respect from the Laws Of that country. =, They fac
thcr alleged that Anna Ruhf is the nlesitimate
sh Ct he[ nhbaye the s .d Ga +, thn or
tenance. After the birth Of this child they were In
S VIE ore 81 Deiphs. % TheT also say ihey lived il Eek
ernforle in tie DEchy Of Schleswig in cemfoItabl!
and hat hey eTs to the o1ttes
placc BIN on the high road 10 fortune; that Rah
dd pet ua his promise az tht A. INC ,ad
these false and fraudulent repfeaentatlons for tn
puzpose oi robbine them Of their child WHICH the:
y Il: Tie re relsto1s asTeed 10 pay ali lie expenses
:1hc respondents, II they would come to america
| which expenses they hsye since repaid They fuE
Of her present and former immoral llfe-
The relator denied the charges Of the respond
crts, ard alleged that the HartunGs were p1rttteu
e1imlnIs in her fatal error, and that her inadety
virtue occurred at teir house md With their k9oT
edge and appreciation, and that they were ra1d re-
The anldavits were read in open Court and III
matter fully argued by counsel. The Court ordere
| the child to be returned to the REALTORS, and n
Sheriff to execute the order,
The SUPERVISOR room being oocnpied BY th
Board, the County Court waa not IN session: H..
11onos Dsu1asnond, >}uI9e- Common Lato.
4aa. Lumard rs. Foot, Kule to plead In twent
IDS. Blanchard ". Conc. Rule to plead in twer
: CAdacere6s3. Charles Duke, Of Brunswick, II
the Chicago, Burlington md Quincy Railroad Cor
panY. Set Tor hearing on the demurrer Of defens
ia Wilcox ct al Us. Wilder tai. Leave to max
zse: Whitney e nj ys Mills ct al. Dismissed I
! complainant's costs.
s5rE1uoR counT-B,ors Chief Jusstoe job" d
"a 4I6. Proctor vs. Proctor. Bill taken pro 60,
, @1 Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Con
} pany IS. Morris Ct al. Deiau1f and reference
t ss6s Jillctt ys. Ewing ct al. Same order.
Al. Hoes Va. Wallis ct al. Time to answer, ds
extended one week.
Inn
~. ~. y; T;oss ", - ia - II ssme orc
e 4,s' G1ly o. CnleaS9 VI Lnu u; 90. 7S Iue
AZ flen e. ~ W. As1aooi M u e.. ett -
80. spencer w. Ao'o u 'o' 1A"e'es 1slo1"~o
. 35s. Bigelow ct nj vs. Lawrence. Suit abated
475: nnrat Ct ii vs. shuteldt ct nj. Dismissed
anE 4Wnntsr Ms.,. ,na Fire 1rsn,,ncc ca
pany W. neas.e' as,t ee' Aos uaA4 neA's y" A@
Bgots Hon. Fan q: Higgins, 'udge-eo'"m'
= LdE. :, ,,,,.
J, an. Gookins ct al, Sa. Lanse ct a' Dlsmiss'
;. at plaintiff . eosts. =, 7ua
a state baak o! n1a5 aoma r. 90 Johes e. d. "uo
3Ss. Hendricks Ve. Marks Ct al dismissed
deiend.nts coets. =. ~ ua,,a ~, ~ r,s,
wy. honefI Vs. h!an eI ~ Ms!ts, s@+' " Pt"4
: tia deceased enggested as parties, c1c; n.,rraa
5ss W,ght " S,boe; ,Inhi. 9n ,ria 1t =, D,sm,.
i. cd at defendants costa: ru.o Doe.,,,a. hoo,
Fcptse CasesLfeopso ;is W. hane. oelen''an' ''ut
= 10 appear as WlLness. c. ,-o,a.
II People 7e' wager anu honHan' GAME pf'eee
~ | tnEe. w., , <,.x.u
8 Before Hon. Jos. E. Gary, 'nage-t7n'"'
e Ldm. 7.,,.,. -, n,e,,,saad
= 81. ayMna Ct al'' W. Lee61eet"' 0ls1''eeeo
Plaint1t.s coetsr ,,.u,.
, 1s56. Gaflana r. Mn!hu; NJ eatu1 3na 9aaes'
lB. hoop " geela1; 1a. sIne ~ u s,oa or5s
e isas. 21hss g a., =; nahse' 3. ~ ,.1ar oN"s
I