, 1864-02-20

~ y. 7,z5s.?1u
Wines manufactured during tbe nast Too rms n
e noiaer states. the United States Goyernm.n rh,s
4ten!o1eo INSULATION. and IN the Soashern States
Jea. Days has done the same thing SO hara un have
Lase ~ ustnlestes from the original 1ss-leaytng
oos ~ iof tae etasea at present allowed To
tute Whisky. The lnrzease named thc-etnc. n,,..
Ho" ~ TO AR dstlllefits-and all In tbree yesrs
me only solution to this enigma IT, that the anthor ~
tne pamphlet had become 70 completely envroncd ~
eA suplees tast hts nlnd became dspossessaI OF ali
knowledge OF the fact that We hare or eTer had - =
slayeholdcrs' Rebellion. !. wa u@o - .
fut tst rs examine tho estimates Of the oFer.~@
pacity Of these 1oG ds:tl1e7ies which il n5.esa ~
"'ae sel5 snaii one Of 50 bushels grain Der Jay
saeh IN 15o 1s8 dtstilleries Manufactured 90 i53
oss gallons Or liIehElaes Or whisky This ahows an
annual capacity Of 69s gallons per dlserv and A.
the rate given by our author gallons per bu.he1 NJ
gtau-pn annual consumption per dIsttiiery orqa ,n
bushels Of grain; which, dvdedfnto s0o working aTn
would Elve capacity Of s7's bushels per day for
each disillery In. the. United States! Buf. In
Tue face OF these, facts, we nre treateis IN
= Series -oi calculations based On. atha vcsx
low" estimate Of go bushels per day fol each al.
tflery-foaved by the statement that "th,s vim be
readily conceded to bea very low estlmat, y Th,s
would be concession, truly. But further On thts
subject :-fhe State OF Illinois In 1sso had e Ister.
les, producing 151 so gaIloas during that year. or
$751; gallons per disunery which reduced b1 II.
same process ~ abo1e, would show running cans.
cfJ Of sA3bushels per day for each dlstery In the
State few dayB since We Published liss of dzrI,
lcrleo In Illinois, With their extreme capaev. hut -
hayeno right to take such extreme Capacity and can
It their AFEEAdx BURNING CAPACITY in the face Of
facts collected carefully Dy the United s,uta5 Mar,
saas ana pnoshed IN the Census Reports. She State
OF ONO, Tor instanee with Isl dIste1eS prouce ed in
lsd0 only Is, AS gallons or H1shwlncs showing
running capacity Of only 10a bushels per day.. A.
cofdins to tho very loT estimate" naped-5a1 bn nan
e's psr doy-tae stase Of Ohio with 1s7 dishller1es
mr. AY1NH -
little over fifteen Millions. Tbs stats OF Now Yort
IN 1so had = dIst1llestcs produclngln tho
q gallons. which at the same rate shoF an aytr
aee running capacity of2f bushels per day The sase
lVann In 1e69hat 191 In
the aggregate SOC g1l1ous-uhch shows an aver
age running capacity OF only TX 3D. OF rao nsr sp
supcoslug tnesc disteriestn PcnnsylyanIa md heen
run Mt tho very low estimator OF bushels pcr dav
produced upwards Of one hundred millions or ,i,on.
or twenty Mlltsns more than was produced raj
sear al over the United statcae aud wess, north
But, 1t may be said, tho dIstll.crtes dur1o, tha
three er four months hare been RAINING at thrIr
IRENE capacity Grant even tAis add We viii NOT h.
aole to Improve the mnttcr ay. During tho ouart.r
ending tc 81. 1875 Illinois paid % per cent, Of thc
sn.le a sa1 On nhhkyl Ii tho United states-snowing
at there was manufactured In this State 80 ner cent
u thc production Of the entire country. hat
ne q dst1llcries In ths State 1s60 with canact
u s3 bushels OF grain per dsy, hid grown to ayrn
eistiuelies. With capacity Of the avery ior est
ate'' Of 50 bushels per day. 1t wou1d renntrc ID
ates Of The capacity Of Illinois to MAKE mn th ~.
tates? ee' sN''e
Dut let Us look again at tlls estimate OF In, a,,i
:f1ea sunnias ut the '"very low estlmaten OF 81
ushcla per day. This would show daily en- ,snr,1
on Of grain OF 100 bushels, or With 800 workfne
ays IN tue year, an annual consumption Of az E0 m
ushele-producing at the rate OF J5<sa1Ions ia In
asne!. gallons In the yearl At hx OF one
la rHkHr 7t~1 a.
suas peE gaIon tais would raise rerenne enough to
~ The entire expenses or the Government r et 6r
r gallon, not lcss than el oo0l Becsetarr hasc
OF at this 80 aud dla1lss your army Ct assossors'
'Aecsoss and taxsgathercrs, and dcvotc yonr whole
ieseies 70 ne reception of your whisky tag, which
1t pamphleteer Assures us, Will reach tba fnr7cnza
m Of four hundred and quarter millions of do,1ar
Inually!. - "'1"is :
Reader: We h,ye eny got to tho nh line Of ,hts Il
aac neither gouE ra lcace nor our space g
M peslnit US TO 60 farther But. the II SO dlat-
'S and the very low estimate" Of so bushels ner C.
> Is repeated ovcr and over esaa alt through ia s,
Ees. 10 notice the subsequent deductions Womb he y
ofthe e1aggcrrat1ons noted sboye Il
lhs aashor OF tho pamphlet c1rcular is auony e
sinc to be the production Of the chief gra1, ~ \,
fters ut Chlcago."- We do not b31tayc mia r.
hHoH ol no Grain exporters here who | y
uld DC guilty Of having produced such e. e.
eumenf. AsadEocates Of taxing stocks OF whisky. ID
hand, nc arc rAthcr inclined to think tb.s i, -
tten up By toue whisky Spectator, WIN. IN ths to
lie OF friend, mndesammuntuon for The enemy. Il,
nc have Jet to learn that this had not s6nrthn aa
90 with the defeat OF the amendment By which The de
Fefnmeht would hare secured what will probably sa
y 60 Into the pockets OF speculatots, b
mere IL ono humlh"tiDg feature Of the case, and Z
. ths-that men aspiring to be- statesmen, uEa IL,
Hon. E. B. Washburns, OF Illinois, Alr, Kasson. or IL
r. and Mr. P1ke OF Maine. should have been "a Fa
ly huunusEed as to rse in their seats in The Cor.
10 OF tho United states and sobcFly read for trath
Wild and eStrarnEans estimates and deductions 60
tafAed in this pamphlet or c!tcu1ar
ne copy We have ID at the service of the HIstosica
In whose arch1ves ought to be stored rs eia
lo6lty. .-s. : | SUI