The Lansing state Republican., 1864-08-03
CARD.

IT, IHs FUa-ic
Inotcs al article iu the Weekly Jal.l 81 Jaiy
i4th. paper Published ia buchanan Mich refectlns
very severely oa tbs c-mpany for not paying the
lal amount ~ Iaslrl.cr O. citizen o. that i3gsu
when the policy oi Insurance on the property was
obtained by fraud Accompanying this is plbiislel
-...e. -.g ,-lal-t.-as
eronce % lie Legality Of tle claim Tie Whole mat
Ter can be- stated n few w0rA Nr Barmors AZ
gi.cl throrsh cne nf the agents q this company fnr
us slrance his house q tLe amount e Eve hundred
dol4rs .ld L.s furniture ior one hundred dolirs
making SIX hundred dollars in al This Application
uaz maio oa ibc --th day u My. ami on the -
dly % June tlc property sts destroyed by Gre. NJ
B4rlare lal l1t l4is cent for tha insurance A.
be- hal not the moley the time OF iBslrius and ILL.,
agent took BIS note for cAsh premium, tie amour {
~ which wss 8 IS Immediately On notilca-
zion af the lro au agent was s-ut there, and tie
proofs of tLs los n4l o-t aud sworn % ly NJ Bar
more. when % appeared that he had only interes.
.n tie bllllns of 80, snl bella i by bond far a
deed. xhen De had ia L.s Application sid il was
fce simple aui 10 membranes Allowing bis ln-
terest o. have baen whai he swore t was 10 VII
S-30. his ins4rab.s Interest would have been olg
Slt5, company for more than thirds
- a man interest ald loss % furniture 500 nlak
ing e53 THIS Ccmla1y PAID lin t-s3 % % VII
lis before mentioned lote of g Is and So, max
mg 80 f5 more than he would have been eliitie-
O. bad D. returned correct valuation on hs prop
slty
NJ Bar.ao-s ought 60 bs weH sati-asl--9lsLt O.
reja.cs that ihe company have treated Am ~ Aanl-
samels Ald Z TIE e-l,0rs of The Uriln ' scre
ba-l.-- men Thy would See t-e i--. position they
have placed ihemsllr,- in. Iley a-latlei q tao
adjusting aseAi who visited that pac. that the Com
pany La without doubt pAl lu they were legally
easitel t.. J-t tAsy B,oraiy boald o. Jay him
the fail amoanl of ile rance aiio1ga be bal no
claim 10 q either ierli ar moral
a J. KlID9BN.
S.or-.4ry stale Insurance Company
IA.-ise. M,rB Aug Isos
The following is the opinion og ihs Attorney refer
red t. above
Lss-I>G Mig July 18Th. la
u p KiLB9Es. p. Secretary state Insurance Can-
pAuy, I-susllg Mich
sis.-I have tls hoa1r D. ackn5wlaiss receipt a
yours q tl.s date. "a esils NJ oPla.on as 10 tie
legal lalisy o. the company wAlla gou represent il
The matter therein stated
il reply have T. SAY. ill ol looking a. TIE POI
cy that the stltl llls1ts cl1t4asl b. ile arpc4il11
AZ % referred q as g. MAKE each -t.temelt con
diti0n q ins1rance. ali helc- each statement is
to1rr1Hfy th-t Is f-.l ADD strcty true u tls cs.
. appears tlat aba assured .l h-s lgpl--t3l err01e
olsiy grlI.liel O. "a t.te ~l-n D.. Lal nJls. or a.
least Represented h.s t.t.o better than d was aae
emitted % s;aie the i1clmtralce " TIE talsoce o
tie plrch-ss Frice against . Efher . Thee facis
rendered tie policy absolutely VOID for 20 -rsgressn
t4fon or c1nc-alnelt II i.Cts material g. tle riss
Tl.Alps % Ins p. 30
I-s policy VS. also Toll f9r ar9lllI r--s0-. Il.
inslrzl-s l1s-- rpol The tlLli va-at.ln % ils
5lliiug wlicL stated l1 tie proof = .os - 500
whereas the entire interest n t1e assured 2 ~.
SAM F-s only s-so Thus 5y LIS iasc -tstszneIti
obtained A. Insurance for upwards q twloe Tie
amount o. actual Interest r tLs property insured
his wss frs11 lD1n TIE ccul1uy - ELlch TIE
amount = r.sk vas eahll1el more t14n thrse times
Ehstit would have been 4 f-l tr-ia Lad bern stated
Philips OF I-s-, p S51.
t7a TO wsl settled . reg1irs tie q10-2toa u A.
tsorltes l. prove
Yol also cal ry attention g. the editorial u tie
B1caznan Weeky U1i1n - J-iy I4ih, ls54.
have eIanined ths same ani tie Authorities reati1g
thereio. have 10 oo1bt the pa5Lshers 1re ndist
able for i.5si
Sc B.sl- - CT Lax So s05
IBID 80 50 10 sos
Yo-rs truly.
JSO v LOSGTEAR
C.yu1sel f,r Corruzrv