Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1862-1865, 1864-01-05
CoMMIssIoNER,a oYHIol

COMMISSIONERS OYTICR ma
December IL, 1868. iii
i'm day fsepese iscs In ehaucery pend.
Ing between the 10 lowing parties:
sSn AosOlsn BAekS95 Charles wasTIt..n, Nancy war
her marriage With Pieing seaOn decreased was JemIns
T. Franklin, and Mary his who aary saead, James
Phillips and kEa h wife Hho was Eiza Hnead Bridge
water and Nathaniel Glenn, Plaintiffs,
wnIsm snssd Thomas seston sad Mar g. his WIFE, Virginia
and Lucy Enen his vile, who acy Ellen Blackburn william
Keed and Elizabeth bic WIFE, who Iatsih snead, James
aad Jane Wife, snsia, snead Alexander
snsad and eeOrge sead ~ sm,s PbilPs their guardian
s who Agnes Bird vaer els. b. Douglass, sarsh
Gos sa . ss 1s 1A kssna
nahxa Newman, Retry K. shaw, his wife who
Children CT Rae6su Alley aud asa his wife VINO was Mari.
Newman, Fleming Newman, Watson Newman Harvey New
L. the bis Wife Who Lhe Newman Joseph Sevman Polly
Nsm.n Ann g. Newman Ma. abel Bhsswater Allen sldg
OF William Bddgvater dtcease ia Sh h. Pam VIM Patnan,
Edwin Pnp. , l5G a ~ T% as Vile sss.
Newman the said Virginia blackburn Alexander snesd. aeos
Bridgwsler H. BridsIaie menreiis Brdswsi:r 10
and exsrder Newman being nfars under the Of
assigned BY defend In suit
William Paman be ng also an insn, under tho age twsno
court 70 defend him In this suit Iefendsnts,
va dtcreed that one ofhe Comnonsfs OF sad Court
certain what und whether principal or n!sre remain.
und sped In this asrg heprocseds III: sale Of
the land unde former dsotee 10 he cause and WHEN
and In what proportions the sane originally belonged si he
ais enquire wAher the pesots srtned 10 tie sid iurd sHd
not appeared and claimed their respective
thereof be yrg dead, and cesd wa,thtr they OF
them have e known descendants hers or dsyse other
than her kindred who are already parties TO the cause Ia
as event they descendants, Lelrs q d.vs.
whether the parties to the OF ihsm
parties be ened 10 distribution Of ssid proporops Of
Of them and the pertoHs 70 Nnom and tae poTsons
which said fund thoud be distributed And
md VII N he In
the parties who may receive the said unclaimed fund.-
with It's future restoration 70 the claims OF wke
mahe eater show better claim thereto And the said
one rce 70 appoint time and place for making said
such newspaper he Select which
notice Oh II recite the ef parties originally entitled
require them claim their hsr distributes
come forward said day ard assert their claims
shall inform them thai In default Of such claims hK
made by them, the Commissioner viii proceed 10 report cs
button thereof among those who be parties The cause
who show onselyes TO De entitled tnseto The sid
publication shall be deemed equivalent TO personal service Of
lice npon all the parties the Ana The said Cemmi
directed 70 report Poa ..d ssys al snssts me court
By himself which be required TO be stated by
party.
The pares interested hereby notified tnsi hxed
Thursday the 2st day CT January 1884, 10 O'Clock
my in the city OF Richmond make the enquiries and
ports required by the I'D And TIE psTe
sbeh married Reed, John snsad Della sGssd
children James Snead used, who haired samuel
Aey dsaeher Of eatherns Newman deceased Asa HtIpn
Ashala Newman, children OF Maria deceasd
who married Jhn Gordon and Charles Bcgvater I'D
Of Agnes BddgEser, deceased Elizabeth Sarah NJ Mari
James K Douglass eharn OF Ann Dculass deceasec
those who have not appeared sDd claimed their he the
und undsposet Of der the control ofshe )urt In tbs
sSo Az e. 20 s. :Ss hers OSess or devils e. W
quirsd forward The 2 day Of Iaruar sea- my
csu being BY them shall procs,d report disirbuon
thereof sroug Eho be parties
who may sho~ tasmselvss 70 be entitled thereto.
THOMAS J. EVANS,
esS-w4v Commissioner n ohaucery