New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1864-11-01

bo5y ti,y ndor,e MI Booe az Respectable That is
tia groun occupy before this Committee this dsy-to ass
them whether Mr. BoOe ,hs 10 dgged to the bar Of THIS
tribunal TO charge which l. not preferred upon
testimony that all the TACT. nsces AIRY 70 MAKE out
NOM dat ia irrinsy isie end unworthy Of belief to
fair require first that the charge shat De
with murh than usual spdorto ask that it be made
a. plain only tue .hesto ssk whether they IA
thew will adhore the Of testimony that prevail IN
Court. OF law, and not psra nan e be depttso o. "a
not be received rial lor tie larsny OF 1--we dollars ana
make the charge against biF Boole SO definite as
Secondly asa ayows by the Committee that that
charge shall be investigated according TO Iss 81 a% o %
dcclsrations Of third parties made in hs absence
one OF the ground. poegted II foI u ,,a' tns paipsJ
IRON pag two What Is the charge there con'l;ned7 The
tina; when these pseudo or spurious appomeeS en
TO Mir Booe for tie pHpoe Of being recognized by BIN as
And tlai j. charge against u hen ne men WON
went to the City Inspector io the puTpos o. sess i '
70 do And tia i ths barge sgninst hi. integrity
And this Committee asked to indorse the action OF the
Mayor Of this city Of I1e teis d,
by that Official with the answer that he knew nothing o. tn
matter and ,aa 'nsy Cue i5' ia tben not
NJ GRa4AS-" Bu The abuse. still continued ard more
20. wers odd without auy eoS the part OF the City
npectog either corieet the evil complained o. or 70 IN
veg.e into the abuse have you anything to DO WIN 'ns
Y
ofcel II they istlfa public otce does not your Is
dcon item ED iAere Suppose Nj Booe zoe, ou ea
Te,osct upon hi. oacia chirer you cannot ake notice Of
IT, And even be commits crime be vii not be di'p"ce
until h. convicted Are YOU required to tab notice Of
misconduct only viii you assume 70 stand sponsors
Tor the private nora beiavor Of all officers who sgbordi'
nate 70 you woud be- just a.prope 20 say mat Tue O9I
poraion irresponsible 9 tie pn ate conduct Of every Al
derman, though he may hoai hi' nes1DoI a. ,na' III d..
/. responsible for he private character OF bis subofdhe'
What MIR Booe doe. 0fea y0u have to do with only
What b, does private member Of society Is subject alone
The compliant against NJ BOOZE Is that he weuA not con-
Oh. pudeT Of ae City Treasury oad taas !; aplse
upon the very face the meU0ri used by the Mayor II
. - ~ RI i'e, vr1ntei lin TO draw be would
lave done tit Justice tic Taxpayers which the Gentleman
has been gprskirg of while az the srme time these men
,o'd A. h,, hon here To- prr,ue him. Tho question l.
this. pd De- 90 rat i r,frag 20 ofnize these men ana
would you ha nsed upon his d Isce ment Ne hnn
not What mon, can o. no,ert nhn sy "neh sPlio'o'I
saws hls arIou,i me- pa officer ~ your depart.
mrut S1auisD fs done so-and -, wha nor, con you
v than fiat Soaud.so had f1 authority tom me- u De
=. oo,ai,es ~ i ", o. , Tor YOUR r.aeiy"
IT. therefore, e chliges rpon teit fice mat y an
Booie voaia MOI re-osu.e tie due Nernd sud DohTe
feutai he woai arpoint them 20 oc~sto which he
never meant a thcu ard nryr lad opp nied L'ui
q. he & te 1ifes o di be- refuse 20 uquire into the
char-e. rr,Trrd brc lu Ifihe latter f. charge that
l. wholly foreign youT ilrstcon be had nothing 90 DO
,it M ell 4rfer Of h. 1T they convicted
OF felony they woula be thereby fade incapable q hodns
ofee BIT Dr. BE- ror. 20 turn observer Of The private ic
II the r.1r attached ~ h Department the street. VA 90
many yre as5 had te honor 70 represent, before
C0frui.fre 81 lf Bo.ri o. Aldermen, Gentleman WHO
court.d he lf si here as Alderman Of r Ientn Ward
disc civ urWts snhs.ln entity elected although e was
no, ticu rdfai,d Ne contested the .eli with Alderman
PurseI or ocrgscr was opposed by NY own brother
A. r,urs. qIr cotton n thst case sgpeIinduced by
,,or, md ,y ,i ak Ifty voter, Of the Waid who
tit ALDERMAN luf bad got hit election % rld
o. IL pole Ilr eun" or ,ed % e ,lsa u.o,' ~.
h. tt Adr,s- Pur.er hld received The certificate Of
eif q
sworn o.. Inspectors % Election 60 perform their duty. AID
fiat thr law pres,i r tie sbfeuce Of equally solhn tcsti
mcy that BE- IVES ld iLsf you could noi auisn sr
c.rlc.r IS tac aeT1l % partirs under OATH ne
ground JED epor wi s Iha when peer wa lIied ~
Great ain ha SO td uroa iHc honor Of peer ani @
e honor of a AusrI citizen wa qiie ~ good a, INA, OF
friu.h lees 10 old aof % stke te tofnnii'r. arc '5
ruled tas he aust hs supported BY Data To- ne
Inspector bad atei nnder OATH and their a c ne coud not
b. attacked bi anything -.c- Il. A,t -.a' H. - he
he OATH tiat hirt by one 9f you tnd ,l. aV pe M
formed The question r y0l h. this; WIN you enter
lsiH 90 li'r % l iie o, .lr law, ss', aSg'h
aec wicked slr~s O. th, fHd ure'' ney a,c pr. 'en.a
fora. that Ie,r. % AL rf'nts g. D. o. re- tloei ere
these ci p-efsnied o. D. Tia.. ,9i. ~ ne It.,t
y. Co'rmgfec g. FL ge patrne 70, ihn wcAri pamphlet
os1 ID, Wv ~, IL 10 f Mr!o 1000 , gen
IN Ibis rels' be swelrs weic false. 10y Tins Opponent
utterly aud pos,sy 's' - lnd oe ir-' a DE sada
I.th Or which be- oAarscs Ma B'os ~ tryu 10 hr1e lin
into fie svsarirr waa mode without tus depou"tt
~ h. al Ia tb efn.i, tufter d1--rs dit II he
~, ,le y, .,e,- 10 tie sre {, Wa daring time when b.
- I-s III -r v fl o.ars lad been lrink iur heavily
=, h. S-tiv e., ,le, IA Chamber ordering several
bottle, g wine and bier and 's whole party 1eng pretty
merry" Now q. ynI know b.. they VIII pit hm INTO NJ
nrsnsrc sleep again, and BRING bm to SWEAR against Mr.
gong pgt 'ra upon 'c evidence NJ hs ~ orn oicer
guesfed hv to- BODY o. which Committee not
e. dissolve hi, connection with tiet because hi esperisoe
a., 10 ti,re Won gong 20 strike down a a an like
this Ihe very t.ep you take l. impeachment Of MI
bo0e The very fact that yor consider thee charges respect
able euoa DO D. a'sed q % o. mineLu A. a. ,t ~
= Ice 4 - NHf e THH
.I I -,e ,l,, A. nv vo1i de-lsion THersi6re N YOU
are ons ~ M BOOZE upon what they charge upon him
then you rS.h' upon the charge oi doing his
Nov Ia rcrrl-- 10 e sr4i dent submitted by my learned
aS6 non ie ,si was made to repeal he sw Of ls5
a 1870 other Board ~ tne Common Council was au
thorl~d t8 anpon, Committee with such powers
ror.enlsd & Inc provision j. ths: The era OF either
boad thr Common Council or hs deputy, iS, issue suO
pouls sd coure The attendance OF wisnesse before any
commi'e, appointed uy either bond I. by sc ion iolr De-
cared 90 be- f.s oheuse punishable as such. Now the
Iei.a,ur, f1r some good r,usou repealed ht law They
toufht exercise fhs jurisdiction shond not
be- appointed by either Board bat by both boalIs Hcns IN
1850 they say that not appointed by tie Board
Alderman by tie Board 81 toaueinrn oi TIE city out
by tie Common Council .hsl have ihe powers which arr
Lave of 1857 og TIE dehlrol o. Common Council We md
be Cofnr Council g. "rhe lrgIativc power o. the said
Corporaon shall be vested in Bond Of Aldermen aud
BoId Of Counclmeu who tofeher shall form tue Common
Cound. Of the cry 81 New oIS.'
Now do not csie whether Judee Allen eny other Judge
ha undertaken % trpes that siuiehai s te law OF tLn
st.ie Thc que zion - tails. Wlcticr You viii defer to
mrepdrtel Judgment " aay judge. whether you VII take
the law wIilh g. written 70 plainly That he who ron. nay
redo submit chat Common Council teru known % the
statutes Of lis state ani defined IN such wfy that there
cane no ~ take about q and the very reason why this
ua.ed .gas u either board could then sppou these Com
ntt. sul the rI, allure thogtir unwe and changed the
sy am perfectly willing admit that the parties need not
1T in lie ale room. lheymay 81 m dhefeii chhn4rIs nui
tIey au.i concur IN tle action Of the Common Council
Now our leaned rl-ud insists t Tor tlc purplar % making
deflrni .Jr money upon de Common Council Il was held
that demand mon eifirr LoalI sufficient Tie Com
i a., er that defso aro.e out Of the eHrem-