, 1863-11-13
CONCLUSION OF TIE ROCK SHTS.
TER CASE.
Tbs E1tortionists Turned Loose.
sSFALSE.lMPRlsUMMENT is I
a CRlME?.
Another 'Intclliccnce0 Partner
Wanted.

=. -, - "-,
eommesc'a eo"os OF me chieaso Ismes, came OIL
mc1held, Esa, J. P, in his ofbce on Clark street.
Mr. Grant renewed his proposItion for the ee7,
,... ..s.1ar ~ a"t.aa.at. IT, ~. -. es r..
false imprisonment, and the whole case for the
@sa1 IL ou1
Attatemo1t Of the argument and facts for the de-
fanse: entering ls.rely End nnute]y into the case
+tsh s,es-ss ,,..,s ,.a, 49, $500 ~ ~ -. ~
Nnlca o'aeseo very Atue 4om IaAt s"o1n 10 pJ
Miller, and published in the TRIBUNE. He eald
he wanted rothlog but fair play and equa, Justice.
ne should pro7e TIN. 1here vas no intention Of
cn1ea vss mers tecapicsl ts1se In, ,nnxlsonm i NJ
At The WON, ana onsht to be literally construed.
TIE application dor separate, instead Of joint
trial, could be decided only by the Court, and he
LEFT 4 IN bis hands:
Nf. Davis said there waa no ground. either in
law OF teason for separate tsia Of these persona
The object Of the defense, In making such pro.
posal. was. that one OF the persons pro.ecuted
shoald be admitted as evidence to swear for the
G.-.-w'N ~ ~0. "'oo
befy. WOULD 1he Court allow one Of them te
become q witness foE the other: he hoped
~ ,,,,n.nt a. or- n.r,., -
."i .r.. f.. n. .aa.,as ~ 40. t', tMt ua'n) came
1hefee lor JEeuce 10 LIS cAe1t, who had been
+s,.l,v ;rr-1s onad ~ 49, VIZ ..sa a.1
srSs n da1enGs1g hr5 cot hala " Si5 sne c1ss
catered into conspiracy assiass lin, : had setaed ED
~ c5s11ad ~, Mi thafs ..s.s, ~ as auos or
neTf Ths T7m[< eni1or RncE had fsss'x -trss-
scented LimetM AZ q dctect,ys for IT 1he Pesf 6f5ce
to faEe Mfjier into cuetod7: ana when fhc tw.n
netfv ronsnirafnrs hsd fr1st,ened thei- ric+,,
hslf out q ns wis, they gof him to egn away lis
na fheT Tah h,d f't he aot snd n ~h
snese 70 70 & I'VE a. away ~. the y9ang mans great
sor;,ne,r{si adtn, ~ ,a 1;,uss @ t anu aeeuy
Sooie ssni and I'D H. tUon a~ay MS
KoT he cond ptose al fn tbe paS Sas
eS nof ae@ 10 u
them punished tof i " Il thsy were proven guilty.
hard that they shenld be called to account for what
thsf a xheq 9. they committed The ofehee-|
could not violate the liberty OF an
1oeaa Ame39n G,u5ea 5 W. 1mpnnity: Lay was then
snd f6st NJ caid M = [smt s. c9ala
" a1gea !oI tae geishse tnat tue prceecutng
M " ss,sea "a9g - ~ i"o psisGas charged
enaa oe tfa t sepafstsiy Bat the
decidedly e b xils1g M to do anything q the eor.
he quoted Section 31e5, American Law, to show |
thst the nn n3.oe1s !of sepsrate trials
mony iof eaeh other, TIE Court had no power to |
Saaot s9ea sepatate trials. And again, that where
dsnnerieS M r. sosuy , connGetea @ IN crime but
LA: oas ae!e WEE case II Which the two de-
1saeauts were connected as conspiratoEs to awin
css.3Uor s had worried together IN:
TOD pe p hts o. ae money and then Of biz clothes
ss1 cie.n ~ tae oasty noots Which the
lied hm out 81 as nan navmen, ~ tae 5.nts swim.
IF Tss Sssy setsat aeg9 M1acn 1.ao dnansa @ him.
1onred On hnsh aides: ~ anS K aGnS,hs, snd pro
y Enev how to ac II be fooxsd hie aao Nc nala f
e%a1e ~ mGhaa ~ IKE 70 hear the defendants eepa
and deccd thSt II TN sae ~ "a agst9st HIM.
O. s1Ketae1.
W. snfn SSe iS and s"o H. tssno
evees yesterday. nd he ga7e It IN 7esy modest,
6os 1n@ scAEa11osWasn manner; The counsel for the
NSasuse S eesppe1 4uate oeJond mis- privilege ~ IN
W. s yoang %pasa snd 1sed
nm nm aa1ane ne examination, with theft. and per
Il xbiei f}e Gonr4 ~dn1a Ss1 % sag tns Least Of
"En1y 1Iyy aao snlnoEty Say gy feenkia9at the time.
Hos; anrtng which M tas coausel (Mz Grant> tried
Tns chssge Eas 70. false tmpEisonment, and Miller
door ps s III saH z sopg sq III
4g.; npon Mie5s shoulderZfsom leaving the room;
locked ths Goo1 f8nr +e entfea teht ne Ioon and
besf That te W.s = gn9 gsn IN hi 2. ift9
stea1ir nnry nv @ 70 tsEe MIN 70 prison for
thsn Tere IL 100 roi1,. ~ ~ 9Wa !ettess Here
fniT nrnTen ~ hat Ky pgnss o. tAse Imprisonment
aIsn nf ~ W. u INC Ioanset ana the admissions
dnnr ~ "11' ooeA' WHO confessed to locking the
ss;stes Rock, BY TIC conrtety of the Court
"as atoHeo g ask the prosecutor some questions