The Abingdon Virginian. [volume] (Abingdon [Va.]) 1849-1883, 1863-07-10


and shall act accordingly.
A. THOMAS & SON.
/ Holston Wooden Factory.
4 May 80, 1s63-3m
VIRGlNIA:--Ata Circuit Court continu-
Y ed and held for Washington county, at the
Court House, on Friday, the 18th day Of April,
1868:
David G. Grant, &c., Plaintiffs,
AGAINST
Hannah Grant, &C., Defendants.
, IN CHANCERY.
This cause came on to be heard this day upon
the papers formerly read in this cause, and the
report Of Master Comr. Geo. R. Barr, and there
ingly confirmed: And it appearing to the Court
from the report of said Comr. Barr, that the
present value of the dover interest Of Hannah
Grant, widow Of Gardner Grant, Senr., decd,
in the proceeds of the real estate Of which the
said Gardner Grant, Sr., died seized, is 81, 314.
g. and it also appearing to the Court, that the
purchase money for which the land in the bill
mentioned sold, is now due, it is therefore adj
judged, ordered and decreed, that Arthur C.
Cummings, the Commissioner who made the sale,
proceed to collect Of the purchase money, the
said sum of 81, 314.62, with interest from the
9th day Of August, 1860, the day Of sale, and
that he pay the same over to the said Hannah
Grant, retaining the legal commission. And it
is further ordered by the Court, that Master
Comr. George r. Barr proceed to take an ac-
count to ascertain the advancements made to
the children of the said Gardner Grant, Senr.,
decd, in order that the Court may distribute
the balance of the fund according to the respec-
tive rights Of the parties, that he state the a.
mount Of interest each party is entitled to re-
ceive, and also any liens upon the land of the
said Gardner Grant, Senr., decd, and that he
report his proceedings to the next term of this
Court. A. Copy -Teste,
PETER J. BRANCH, G. c.
June 26, 1s63-4w
The parties to the above-named salt win
please take notice, that have appointed Tues
day, the 21st July, 1868, to take the account
to the children of Gardner Grant, Sr., Sc, SC.
They will therefore appear at my Office in Abing-
don, Va, on that day, to eneble me to comply
with the requirements of said order.
GEO. R. BARR, M. G.
June &c, 1863-4w
VIRGINIA: Sat Rules held in the Clerks
Office Of the Circuit Court of Scott county,
en- the first Monday in June, 1863:
Joseph B. BYRD, Complainant,
Nes VS..
Nancy G. Byrd, Defendant
IN CHANCERY.
The object Of this suit is to obtain a divorce:
And it appearing by satisfactory evidence that
the defendant is not q resident of this State, it
is ordered that the said defendant appear here
within one month after due publication Of this
order, and do what is necessary to protect her
interest.
A Copy-Teste,
S. H. MORRISON, D. 6:
June 26, 1863-4w
VIRGINIA:--AtR Rules held in the Clerk 3
Y office Of the Circuit Court Of Scott county
on the first Monday in June, 1868:
+ William J. Sires, Complainant,
VS..
Lucinda Sires, Defendant,
IN CHANCERY.
The object of this suit is to obtain diverce=
And it appearing by satisfactory evidence that
the defendant is mot resident Of this State, it
is ordered that the said defendant appear here
within one month after due publication of this
order, and do what is necessary to protect her
interest. A Copy.-Teste,
S. q. MORRISON, D. G.
June &c, 1863-4w