Daily State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1861-1865, 1863-10-14
wee rr..,aen, ,,nm,,n,. ..r,e,ure.,


Vice President Hamlin. 10 hi. late speech atthe
Cooper Institute. ssid:
We 1--WE class Of men among ia Name
vho sers much want he Constitution - 4 = aud
the L Mon ss il AS HIVE you gnt thein neref
[Vo.ee-. 'Yes.l IN very sorry indeed that
they cannot have IT, Il : mere demages usm.
mere clap trap: IL i nonsense-it Is not very
good nonsense Why, the Union As il VAST II
there are men in this goodly city OF New York
who have any tears over such results. am M
clired to the opinion tha, they are crocodile
iear- If YOU have got those here who have tesrs
% she. over the Union il va, think that
would form a very good sketch for picture p"
This = from the Vice President of the United
States IL is sneet NJ the Union a. u was IL
VS. ssd dsy Tor u when a party got power in
government under Constitution they were Op
Do ed TO. and over Union they disliked This
took AT oath TO support the Constitution a.
IL j. and the Union as il was. when he evidently
was opposed to both He thinks any one who
sheds tears over the Union a. it was must shed
crocodile tears. he il not one OF them. He
thinks a man Who would weep over the Union
IL vas would make good sketch tor a picture,
10 be laughed at ,Or sorrow over the loss OF such
evil
1t Hamlin were alone in such expressions. he
would be pointed at a. monstrosily: but unior
tunately he - venulatDg the common opinion of
party ~ control OF the government; and they
ONLY proclaim now A sentiment Of opposition u
The United Site. which they have always felt.
IL has been their great ambition To change or
pervert il Not being able 10 succeed IA peaceful
times, they have seized the opportunity OF war
to accomplish their desire
The reels are in precisely the same condition.
They TOO don't want the Union rs il was They
much opposed to il "a Hamn They say
il was house divided against Itself. that would
not stand; AMI they propose to take their part Of
the house. and have Hamn 4 Co. TO take theirs
Believing as they and Hamlin do, submit to
any tribunal in the world. say which is the more
just and generous, these Southern rebels or the
Northern ones
This house was common inheritance There
was a way TO change it, whenever twO-thirdS Of
the State would propose and three-fourths ratift
the change Eich parry that desired TO change
the house. had the right to seek the change in a
constitutional way
But one side assumes to take their half of the
house and ft IL up To suit themselves, and have
the other take their half and adjust it TO their
own notions
The other faction say no. We must fix up
both halves To suit ourselves We will not con
sent to let 81 r half remain as il was. and A.
sert our rights in it; but will change it by
force To suit our notions without regard To laws
or constitutions. Now one side has no more
right to make this arbitrary change than the
other had to run Of with one half of common
and indivisable inheritance Both are rebels and
revolutionists They don't like the Government
we have had: and when they swOre To support it
they didn't intend to keep the oath IL thew found
an opportunity to do otherwise. Both now sueer
at the Government they swore to support. They
think man knave fool who would regret
It's destruction.
Now. there il no doubt but that three fourths
OF our people the poles apart from these two
factions, and having the power. why do they moi
take the control of the Government out of hostile
handsb Why did the people ever commit the
honor of the Union to men who proclaimed in
advance their dissatisfaction with il? WHY do
they now allow il TO remain under their controll
We shall see on Tuesday if the people of OHIO
aud Pennsy vania are really for the Union. or
they agree with this Northern faction, that the
Government must be changed or something
else be substituted for it Louisville Journal.
We think, from present Indications that some
thing else is substituted for it.