New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1863-01-22
10 the nIemhe.-s ofthe Amertcan BLDG uuIo.

| To the Membe~ - of the merfcau Bfbie UpIou
to direct ySoI 10 s on NE p5,,ss
&C. from the Of the Public mind that Sub.
to receive the am uni Of attention due to s
Even should the Reference. In tho New Testament to the
80 For Moses vrofs Of be- regarde to dsterine thai
me 1,e q the ApPeaion Of Moses here proves
ton 20 that which did by him vet .,s The xgamcnts r
attrbuins the Authorship Of the Pentaeuch 10
regard 10 of any ether Authorship either s, or are
recorded to have ever had existence.
Moses could be the Author Of Pentauch perfs me
hst to state the points which in my latter entitled Bls
exist in the eIan MSS Of the Sacred Text secony Tat
the existence Of limited number Of Mrcs has been atso.
s 5,s. F:'ssiis: Thirdly That 20 us q ss Fcs:
tsteuch claims to be that which its Author ectuy
attributable either 10 the AuOr Of the ORIGINAL Document
or to the 1ranscr5er, Of those MSS Feathy 1hst 40
st1emen jy,y DO attributed to the Author VI the
Original Document a. Contradiction that be explained.
9i,er oy Miraculous Interference, by Error in tho
~ viii Vii prscesa TS to Examine sfss h. been
sayanced 70 prove TLa Moses could not have written az
e recorded In the Pensteoch should DO sdnitted
that some portions Off were written by hiu
sasn ION Ezra who aOurshed In the Iith century.
OF tho i've following could have been written by Mo,es
rn" ne contends, That last Chapter ia the Pents
bis death and DfsI s sn * & IS
yae prophet he him." which could only have been stated
raj Reason could discover heso !Lnss or why God eod not
have Mracuouy Revealed to Noes for ths bsnsGt Of sue
Servant be he'd Revealed him. that which existed before
the creation of hi' Servant our only alternative Is gd
ng,v TO be simply the assertion Of bn Ezra 70 that effect
That God did HIS Servant Deut xxxv
Though the painful practices Of the Roman Cashos
ng their dead such remoya rendering the sin Of wcrhpng
by His shoud live honored He might
him to write, That there nrer oro's n Laa prspds ks
him" II the Author Of tho Penuteuch could ony
which he knew by his Natural pow the Copy oft whch
possess must then be psnfu coecficsSi Fsse:
hoods for what Reason could uofod Lord
did Tyan.ds Ao,e lie did EnOei ov ytnSs Inn from
.is roytd az as did Eiah out taat ne aS ssy IN or
ioy reveal this sny why should a0s that have
Seeon4v ibn Err. contends that Moses could 30. have
written tie Pentaeuch because his acts no. therein
corded In tie FDn p0son but in the Third pr.n Thus
3s' a 1G lac Th. ccHisntion vii Id
much 70 ION Ezras reputation Where Is the ir2o"baHv
Y n: :ns s9g is" 5s M1s pas
hm,s at the head Of has adranesd guard ne per'on99ve
The charge In fact he ordinarily does ssue his orders In
tho third person aud BY 50 doing be neither impsirs their
Sense destroys their credioity There are t"2 asmea
5 ' 4Fs T. aP "a II. n1"s aaia
the po'siby cannot be queoned Il certainly requires n?rs
!g9! 'n Ib9 Ezra bal advanced g cary e.1vsi0s h,s
Deu 1nIiy &c wguld not be Improved By ibn Ezrs'
requirement. 80 tie ,e,taat II he Lgd d,d go.
and he 6wed ne n ts sas. ~ ne ana ayo f%,
e0H,,..... aud there arose NOT d p''p"e' '""' "e
unto me-" -.
And Abraham passed through the laud sno sns
Causanite then in the land the writer Oh vsS 10 tss
snd which %ss only in the days Of bsvS Ion Ez,, hero
tbs, the Iay @fs sas ss al bee Ia az II. m u
,eyi,ag ne record hsv had dspcrted from ard ths
.e,sen Of me land; or returned 70 ogas ats' spat
mon from az and TIL these last senses are SHOWN ~ 70
imp0D ms oG ono na ..ny false one Beside
these requisite TO prove oe'ofe 'osn
rSlSaa ., nssVsd by the ESesoS Omission
sag word h. it is i?'.is that .ush re- T,o
.eS.i on f'd a ss /: Which 5a
EI5s b.; pot done coD,.ps. hs, In Gsr XII. l. ws
rssI lid XG,11a1s eILsd fle mOpntaia Jeaerehhsh,
a. .aid til. day. in a' noun, q "a. Lord ,sa. %
tS Day IN Il. If As Lord aaG be Gen. GOULD only
and consequently proceed from MOses Now t.rs
qute for The settlement OF the doubts here raised respecting
the Authorship of this passage TO decide whether the Text Of
bn different TO- or more correct than thss which We
wssH T io% Es % zoe n AaSc n s
OF the LINK, Noses claim to be the Author OF IL s
Of he LAX being Had Abrahan called The namsy
at place Jehorah he order that y should haze sa1
no,shs soaehsaies decision on either Of these points
FVfhy lbn Ezra conteuds ths. as Ia Dea ~ II q re-
e, % 5 S ks ss.sr s. ysS s..ss
I. Il no,i Rsbbah u The eha.res hmmSs. toi' parass
@ eng before him. aud thrsoe in Older TO abb.
80 Appeals for evidence TO ancient moau-
mental In case the Author Of the passage proeaeed i.o
Or Ia order to point out By the nature Of ths mstsA
sensth as one proof Of being Clan, which proof
Hortrd BY second Immediately succeeding the tenn
inatio o. IDu Ey''' qa0!aVhs sy..ah 10y esy 90. a.
len - ICeoj and 6n r.Y. ssry dia,u,, ,.s sse"
~ nan 1taaa certainly is eitt.er..-- be- t.r,nsS
TI ph,ase to have reference 10 an srsn v'n 9etsee
b.Io,s the time Q The usor. pritg" IS with al ds
lice to the passage hsy. reference TO 81 event whicn
tue time Of It's being written was "a &C Ell iS
but that king % whether living CT dead vas arc
therefore II Is 0s,b from this passage 70 prove InsA
Moses was 0 not tue author OF IL ~, y.
The foregoing objections Of Ion Era % tho s'nouus
,a. AnhoThp OF the P.uaeuch 10 Moses DO possibly en'
b that have been justly advanced thereon ta'
That the Echoes Of numerous inexsct ineooe
even when purified by the rejection OF their rspeon'
co. Tain far more extensive list. and embrace tneI uos
objections the Class lately advanced by Bishop Coen,os
they di-crin sng the difference between an efamns
ION Whether the person to whom God had made cectsa
Whether the that God had never hfssdes 20
any specified thing RECORDED Inc oSlso' es
of lbn Ezss are ercfHshSly connaed 20 INC ne
% the second Should the foregoing examination oil Ion
objections have embraced ali v At has peen adysnccd
this subject worthy OF considsraiion ana snono ,hn
he advanced thereon not be accepted Oy us tIen
NAV rejoice merely Ia the glorious thin3s hs
eaed In the Sacred Record OF the Pensteuch but aso Tue
uualoyed with the cAncte OF Donb tL9. mg'es
Author OF tie entire WCTk privilege douDy V4ua
bic 10 him that does comprehend, how Is possible - as
the Author Of the iHHume'dof psssssos
which lbn Ezra determines could not have boon written oy
him aud set % place the smallest value on those tus'
even acknow TO be the Author tthen
'''''''4 '''' HERMAN HEINiErrER.
No f. Fenchurchst. London, jan. 9, 1865
Rureap of WEIGHTS and Observation-Disclosures
Tie Oh Of CITY sEALER or WEIGHTS AND hEAs-