New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1863-07-25
SUPREME COURT-srEcIAL TEEs-JULr "a Befor'
Jssi!c- MosHLI-
DIVORCE CAsk-Fh'N'h'E-- ~
s.rnh Fairbanks -. jonathan ks!roaLk,.


DIVORCE OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES IsG.
s.rah Fairbanks -. Jonathan ksiroaIk'.
In December 1902, the plaintiff by her attorney,
b,o an seton sgan,, he Attendant who 10 her hu'oani
Of crusl end uhnDi,n uesmen' towards Ter oy ne
rn cb.rrus tho, during geaef portion o. hS H
,ast had ,.o,..v ,rea,ei nor gea, cruelty sod Ia
t,a.r,y oy .ikas h-r KNOCKING down. AMI ote,~s-
tfraiing her extent tL4t IA Marc io1I .nr
Wa. compelled to leave hin, ana tsso with her Their only
ed ,en .s,i Absat seven yeaI. The charges the de-
1870 o.iei ,~n-..ily end ay.ncd tbs; hs had Away.
treated h. vile with great sinaDrs' aud hsd nHvef 'eA
hsf ssocstd her dowa AID tn11 Ahe h-d 's' A'' "'
w.s c ,steneB. Of the when It came on 70 be
'ri.d s-iofe Mf Justice Mcneil ".1hou jay 80,
Tst- Of n,. Court, the hf day " Jau- A'I "hei VII
p,.-s wtie .sofn - Tie pl4.n'i- sua saYis y % b1
led IN ths nj ntis'. ani, fer fourteen years and on
..v. OCCASION. bad s defendant abuse hs ~io and
- ,, I'm. mock nor down pv s4sls heavy blow on
80, er.aiin, large weisg thas defendant did not
provide hc food sd uouriair"s - hn'osni 'hosd
10 81 FAifbanss reply tasse aud other csrse, Of
=. rstufo .rn yidcd large oGn1oE o. ~ituosses, "ho
~s, to an .nuny da. gu sta'saeht 81 a't ana p tlei
,~.nov shoc4 hat he hai every rrspecs discharged
/ tov Ais vile she dati.' Of nusoind ~,
lho case Wa teen siief snH..us up ~ tho 'el
eouuss submitted 70 mo Ies' is' II. aeo'.oi 'S',hs
III. the ~inTss' May Medium ~rat 20 me enc" o. VIC
dsioadanr. counsel aoi zoe ''s'oI :" &c 49,
giving tes io.luonJ opon mo HiHl $40 h,o St'a Es-S
,r- iu n,r nlnd orirs the re; oi the evidence she
,,o pom the ,ra Of cruelty Of the deendant toward s1
.laIuun being wholly isI'' snh V"tue - 49, 'a' $50
been persuaded to gve such ia'e e''imouy a. ihlt Al
order to her conscience Of .Hs Priytl SOC 80 ~
n,cd she desired 10 MAKE an ogen e0aie'oh oe''' TIC
/ Court. III, /, a.. -
statement % fact, having been embodied In tho I'm
OF az AFFIDAVIT on application 90 Judge Mcneil o. granted al
oif o. .ho cause wnys .hearng Of the should not
he lad ~hicA coming be head hi. Honor giALtea all
oder FOR raA.anss which soeA place ueiofe
aim IN tne gith Of June special Term. va Naca &C.
c,ion the Coa, Cd witness. Mary AcAdars 10 80
np5a tho sud submit 20 ErrNantuaiion OF that p1
Of Tor t..tlopy On TO usi alleged to have been
,..y sssa agss tnr dslcrdAH which sno DID, aui con-
feed by iuc hs al u Ter former es-
aony whio referred TO cruelty OF he deeaaH' toward tho
Iisinsln 80 who'll, iaise.
Tue Court Irrmiued the plaintiff TO call Two WIT
nea sts Of cfncity by the defendant toward
lis i!s aud that wtn-s.c. had heard Mary McAl-ma
make statements that che hsd the deiordan ufoa
d abu.e Tue glaluuf Tho again closed @bd sub
/ ulu-d 10 nj. Honor iog decision.
- Count decided that tie pGutf had faled to prove
IN. .rts OF any cruel iuluusn neaimrut al
r..a 10 compliant" AnI as eoucuson Of law 10. that
i..d entitled 10 judgment disnI.pg the comPat'
Ctafr. spencer and Henry l. Kerr counsel oG plain.
ia J. Kennedy fuflons and bsi jaan J. b!sakman conn
eel lut the defendant.