The New York herald., 1863-09-05
Dion sovcIcAvLTs BANKRUPTCY.

His Final Exa nal n tiOn and Disc hRrSe-
How e x Earned drfSpsssS .nS Il noM Ms %.
posed OF 1.-the Tenants Refused 10
Pay Rent Daring tho War-His Ca
COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, LoND0H-AUoUsr 10.
Before Mr.. Commissioner Fame.
IN Rs DIox BoUucAULr.
The proceedings this case were resumed By adjourn
mcnt from Friday last.
for creditors, and Mr.. Lawrence Tor tho bankrupt
HE examination OF the bankrupt by Mr.. Lewis was
In question from;he Court as to whom Mr..
Mr. he opposed for Messrs Patrick, builders
Mr.. LinKlatcr said there was no doubt the opposition
was that OF Mr. r. Webster
Mr.. Lewis said thero foundation FOR the as.
sertion.
Mr.. Mark Patrick was called and deposcd tha, he was
creditor for - I33 the balance OF bill for 60 400 r
work done to the Westminster theatre He was not on
posing for Mr Webster had bad no COMMUNICATION with
him, and hac never seen hun except oo the stage
BY Mr.. Linklater-Haf issued execut on against
bankrupts goods shortly before the bankruptcy. The
bankruptcy was the consequence Of that execution
for arrangement by which they would have obtained
2os. in the pound II part Of the arrangement that
Mr. Carew second mortgage, should forego his claim
until other creditors been paid in full Tho pro
pcrty mortgagcd 10 Mr. Carew had been sold since tho
in the pound n the property had been sold lie declined
% cnrry the and issued an
but not 10 consequence o. communication made TO hum
or Mrs. Patrick He lad heard OF no communication
being made % Mrs. Patrick.
Mr.. Robinson said he appeared for Mr.. Webster Who
had given Instructions and he objected his narnc
being thus irregulary introduced
The bankrupt, examined by Mr.. Lewis, said had had
imperfect account OF the working OF the Adeph the
atre rendered by Mcssrs Robinson Co. his solicitors
The assignee now had that account
Mr. Linklater 'beng appealed TO, refused produce
the account objected further examination on that
subject. The creditor had rather interest Ia support
assspees Ind sHameed ,bs 'Sa see"n, S1,s w. aovn ne
and we're satisfied that fl 200 due from him
Mr.. Lewis pressed for the production Of the account
Mr. tor rQafit tha NJ a.
tor could not Investigate another creditors account
Mr Lawrence also opposed the production OF the &C.
count
His Honor ordered the production Of the document.
Mr. nkater said be should respectfully decline TO pro-
Mr. Lewis said he should not 90 on with the examna
ton ill the document was produced He should
Mr. Lnka,er sad he had no objection 10 produce Tho
document 70 the oheial assignee or the Court.
The commissonrr-i s-- shall hall order It's production.
the Court Qhe document was produced and put tue
The bankrupt said t6s, was The mpcrfec, accoun, to
which he had referred The nrst date was October g.
1891 and the last 2st June 1882 II purported 10 show
count last February He disputed the moment he 70.
ceived IT, and sent back TO Mr.. Robinson saying IL was
lie had made out showing fl 200 due to him
from Mr. Webster. He knew that that amount was due
He believed he had had several share ransactops IN The
New Theatre Company through M Rickard The par,es
who started that company had nothing 70 do with West
minister theatre but agreed TO purchase The pro
duoed Mr.. Richards account was first rendered 10
the promoters, and then 70 witness vidnay BY that
account II appeared 23o shares 10 the hsd
been bought at premiums ranging from 10 V Here
4 long discussion 10 whether those
should be inquired into II was impossible for him 10
saw whether shares had been sold at dIscount. Mr
RIckard tho broker of the company and the matter
WAS left by his and Mr. Kimbereys wish IN his hands
Ie had no knowledge belief whether the as
correct or NOT. Il showed loss thosexealInrs OF
1850 He adhered 10 the statement that Mr. Stephens was
ono the promoters Of the company and jointly liable FOR
the expenditure notwithstanding his letter 10 The nspers
The expenses were entered AT f3ol2 Mr. Carew was
creditor fof nearly f5 900 had never stated 10 NJ
Patrick that he only owed Carew f 20 and that no Mad
no security bad conversation with Patrick In Nav ast
Did not tell him that Carew had security; believed "
had security at that time; be then owed lin ali ~,
700; he bad invited Mr. Patrick 10 Hereford hove on
about tho 18th OF May 10 lay the a his bn
fore him had not previously received
from him; was voluntary reques 6n his own mar, FOR
Patrick 70 come be foressw that h should be able 70
~. Comm Iss,oosrSoaid W., zoe Sln S,n o. June