The New York herald., 1863-10-13
Tho Guvowski Libel sult.


7On saturday morning, in che Distrios q Columbia su.
preme Court sting criminal court the case Of the
United states ssainss Adam 'aa,Csc on ss ,ns
Clerk of the State Department, was continued go
Ason Friday, Chief Justice Cartier was on the bench
Mr. Carringon, having proved to hts satisfaction the
exsteuce Of certain proof sheets and tho possession OF
em ~ the defendant. gave Tho following written notice
hereby give no produce ssr.a.. :S
S % s e and
t pposs OF bens read in the case Of the United States
cSu Il AaS H. piss q co"s snt for The TRIAL
NJ Brsdey stated sst the osr was senswhas modi
Aed Friday Yesterday he offered 20 prove snas tne
not The proo Sheets but the substance He stated that
one Of the proof shecs contained the tiepaRe"Dtnry
from March, 1861 10 November 1877 Ins cannot %.
s,ncs the proof sheets 70 tho testimony
presented by defendant 70 sepicmbor libel
nastrr 10 specific In specific FORM y specific ale-
The Court stated that the question was whether the
notice. presented during che peuding Of the trial. Is In
NJ Bradley read from Grsenear 10 tho notice
should be prcsented before the commencement OF the
tral also stronger extracts from I'osc"es Criminal Ev
show that u should be presented not only before
the commcncsmsnt OF the trai. but reasonable time
snou,d be given for the defendant TO produce Il.
The Court then stated thai boter notice should be
George Rasd.ll tes.aed ! nm apprentice with Nj.
me to know whether the publication was posrcssng be
came 70 hurry Il up; he said We were zoo slow; II was
last August never saw the work the Count was
publishing In book form Afterwards. III "a - t.,sa ID
Mr.. Caflngton put the Indictment 10 tho hands o. the
Witness and after the witness had read he asked him
whether he read thai in the work.
Have you or read the books
have seen the book, but not read n, excepting q
pas---- Naj ahr
william H. Moore testified; l am . printcr know tho
dsfendant he came To mo last August year aud asked
call at the State Department 10 see him; went N
the state Department: him shcre; he told that
be wanted mo 70 publish diary; mover knew any
Mr. Bsstsr-I recanixc book similar 70 those
which We have for sae was paid for them; they sold
Henry Chase never had any conversation with Mr.
0uro~ski since september last
Mr. Bradley objected TO the calling by the District At
torney OF witness who has testified and uterroGaiing
him concerning the same facts and circumstances 10
which he 1rst testified. nrr II.f
William Hunter testified IL am chief clerk In the De-
parsment Of State have been there twelve years.
appointed by Daniel Webster do not know, wish
Cd 70 know him: have frequently seen him 10 the de
parmcut but always avoided him account q the char
actsf he bcrc; do noe know his employment suppose
shat he temporary cierk; Count Gurowski he
ness ss II NO ono elise IN The United states could trans
late: know no other man oy the namo of 0urowski.
Mr. Brndey then stated that evidencs had been pro-
duccd that the defendant h guilty OF the alleged
bsl Tho prosecuting Attorney argues 70 show that be-
cuss Count GurUwski printing Office IN August
lee2, and hurried up work in The press tho count
therefore the author OF book entitled "Dary from
March, 1851 70 Novembes. 1854 TIE district Attorney
ocs 70 put the book evdence, without connect
- SSuNs Dss~"o~s Wv" W. ~"~'P~''s~ W f~~~soH
thereof. ~ lIfa iu il0i a1rrlli
Mr. Darlington said that 10 the question Of the Court
whether the book admissible evidence IN court,
sucent 70 know that the book contained the be
charged 10 the Indictment he had prove the author
ship proof sufcient TO know that the book had
large crculaton IN the city OF Washington. thu name q
ths Count Gurowsk importing ~ face 10 be Nh work
u possible, but nos at all probable, that ths work
forgery 9.nu 900 brow igg
The Count was TIE CITY during We ctrcaAtion of hs
work. He In the bookstores Of the city during IL
sale, and made no objection sl i4f 7sd Hi0fT
Mr.. Bradley staaed that the nrss time hin lft
hs heard q propositon monseroue. "A work Il
published with certain ~ faco - the desig
mated authorship-ergo: q man bearing similar nsnS
guilty u ths lbslous matter contained IN the work
There n noe paros Of peoo 70 show that the dssndan
In the eity n tho tlme that be knew benz
circuaee1, thns b n store whsn she book wa
sold, though attsmps 70 prove such msds. 1f
Chez Justice Carter delivered charge 70 the ry
which, ~ considssabs length and with charactsrists
sbty he decsassd that the question was simply whethe
Count 0urowski asthorzsd Ne pubcstoa OF the veluse
o. thAs portion rsasng 70 The oe chargsd IN tbs ndict
meas OH al Hf hT @ % q ls4 lt n q. 600 ildf
Ths Dssics Attorney wished 70 know NE cass could
cot be postponed euabls him IL publBhsri
Mr.. BrAdsy ooectsd md tho Court susssssd the %
The DsutoG Attorney tasn desirsa 70 sutes se,s pros
which The oourt ruled impossIbss under the oircsn
seaacss, - svidcnos had besn sdnitesd. tVa fDi
The jury thsn rsedsrsd vsrdict of not guilty.
|'I City Intsliigenee.
I'm Fnn Rsunuxr NEW Yoax CAvAiss-favscno'