, 1863-03-24

.:s=:1 -: :>T..=: =.
Of technical errors the recital Of vhiehthe Bishop
In answer the Bishop shows That all the rc7a!re-
nents Of canon II have been literally and fully
complied with.
THE Bishop then ahowH that all objections from
by The written 1cqucrt Of the complsi,ants for \
po*trt Et1,cat Of the time Of riai. On Feb'r o3rl
i:.us admitting the a:eesae1ts Of trial, and liking
eurgcttyc1y lifs own convenient day.
Il Tic t. r Ra syef1ed sdns as
sns e te a ri nasaeP P59s a
March. euch postpenemcnt having been made lu
tossesncnec Of a direct personal application Of 8.
9. ro-tponem, Mt is invoked as Of absol1te fight
and the interference Of foreign jurisdiction de-
nand.d. t.cm the extremity Of its being withheld.
of the correspondence which has takepp place.
In the matter Of the the testimony of Sebastian
| /. Everett and wife, on which the complainant
,Inty Of the testimony, o. what they can testify.
he knows nothing and that. notwithstanding the
alleged anxiety Of the complainant to obtain tIet
evidence be learns their names as expected Wit
nesses for the fret time from the bin Of complaint
July 4th,, the Btehop requested the nsmes
1 any 9 1ofea tsHn 4
nehcd The complainant with snhpgnas. II blank q Of
11t t @ Auu tbc tasn. ~
hT cnmmission. No notice whatever was taken Of
ta X n1,nnssi md the W;sbon on Learning from tbc
rnmnlafnsn n thc names Of lie two witnesses"
a}dressed to them q most urgent letter,
Teoucetiue them 10 girc, either In personal
oppearanee OF By commission, such information as
,yas In The power Of either. copy Of the letter
il auHcxcd. The Bishop denies having euy knowl-
edge direct indirect Of the least indi9Posttson
to allow procure The testimony o. .ne EFetetta,
ps Ra, e t hf esfSsSs
lie las been aware oi ANYTHING that y Ton n Z 1ndnes
him to suspect TINT the parties named anu ch3rsed
with efforts to 90 90, haa eitnef ING VIII or power
to influence tnS VI nonappcataoce Oh
the Witnesses N sSss,.on, e,'sa' t.
,ua,..,,, ~ .to .,r,1 fsor,+ o.To. o,,,a,,.4,.,
tursdict'oh ol lne elll eous1 osef ecescsiastical
tnaa IT. IS IN ,,Gsea M Of the rights
l., tha o,a of ccr1cs,astic,, dia,;n1;no
=" ~ 49, ~ ~ s,n.sS,.~ aps -
Accompanying the answer the at11da,it Of sebas-
t,,r 4 F1crett ~ f,,oyorond S,,do "a ,1sn s,as
,,'n ~ " ~ uno. also nlea'
caeo TRIBUNE on the ssth Of January similar to
that in NE h;1 of comn1a;nant. tbot bo -.na ~
1''0' ~ ~. VI" " .ou,p''tA""tt '.AS "e "as Ao.
where Mr. Uarer is charged to have committed im
...,ot,.a, as \ f,..,, -. ,.as.ssA,.l -
plopr,e1.es ana iut1net 1nss no ;nnaenee has been
the" 10 reuse 'ss. glslng tes.mons.
-: 49, 49, - .44 ~o4A''oAuN'
). Thos. smith. W. u. Roberts and Geo. Greene,
three OF ING dclendatts to Mr. Hascr's
bill oi complaint also nc an answer .Aftor ad-
fnteeons 81 r7tmd laSae tacts set forth In the bill
Of ofcompMinan. the atntln that they were reluctant
| 70 setye npon lne commission OF Examination,
IT, aho 9nly impeiae4 te 70 70 ny sense OF duty to
tion in manner onlT "a rl,cit t1uth tba1 4haar
ssnpasIn s "e.e Mta tns complainant, but SO d.
feGt WE w tns tcstlnony tnat shey could not with
| In any way to make the CHARGES ty Rcy. John
MhklnEop' ana maj me pretended Irregularities
and ln1ofnalItes III m re bill Of complaint are not
mastefs NJ lo5 tae jurisdiction Of Court Of Equity.
Ihey also deny that the facts brought before them
IN nc examination can be disprovcd By s. s. EY-
erett and WIFE, or that the latter have been tam
| pcred with. and affirm that from the commence
Mcnt thcy have done oil III their power to secure
MT. Hagrr !air and impA1iini hearing; that they
hare doue everything in striCt cuttity and that AR
Hager has not been petsecuted III tho premises.
| .xsxrrr ~ Tnr n,ruo,,a cn,1.,r,.
-t' o1 III '''noi elAfa-AiH'
| The Bishops Chap1ain, Rev. John Wilkinson,
also files an answer setting forth that Mr.. Haser
Joliet last August with letters Of intzoduc-
tion from hin to certain families, and that be re-
| 1naIned there until September During the month
| ofseptember he was tret made cognizant OF the
| alleged fmproprietics by q gentleman in whose
| howae Nj, II. WIS guest. In the month Of Dcto-
Der lie. at the request OF families In Manhattan,
communicated the faets to the Bishop, and in con-
tion With the parties alleging themselves to have
| hoon incp1fn1 hy In h,+