Litchfield enquirer., 1863-03-05
-lpolitifal.
Cateehisy,p.

I Question. Who is Thomas H. Seymourf Answer. He is the coHservativei caudidat
 for Governor of Connecticut.
 l QADoes he support..th Government? l A. No. He dcfies it. l8 i a,e.a 1.. l C. Why 2 Does he complain that its policy I is wrong? '1'9. l H. He does.
 | Q. But does he not rely upon the ballot-bo, as sole remedy for political evils!
 A. No. He proposes resort to ssom' l Q. What "other remedy ?'' P st' l A. Bloodshed. aa ;e @ gs l Q. Bloodshed where sas ,8 . 1 A. Bloodshed herein Connecticut. 70. What proof exists that he propose bloodshed in Connecticut as remedy fo political ev ills? F. a
 A. His speech, delivered in Hartford, Feb Tod. Rriiatsa in the Register Feb. POI in which nc deliberately proposes that 1t ms party fui in redreasing their alleged wroags by the bal lot they, shall resort to :. te some other remedy That other remedy" must be bloodshed. No body can doubt his meaning.
 .. Is he as Conservative" in regard tt life !? & ,a6 = A : A. Quite. .... ,..... ....s O. How does lie propose ts "conserve' property?
 A. Generally by bloodshed, as have already stated but more particularly by reputation.
 Q. What does he propose to repudiate
 A.. He proposes to begin with part of the national debt. e 4 e
 0. What preof exists that such is his design
 A. He supports the Tenth Reselution of the late Hartford Convention. I refer to Hart. ford Convention number tsce, not :. Hartford Convention number one. s a s,ss'ss
 Q. Does that Tenth Resolution point to repudiation of any part of the national debt
 A. It does-bsyond all question. - '- ;
 .. What would follow from repudiatioH of the national debt?
 A. No man can tell but probably repudia- tion of all debts-State debts. town debts, and private debts. 8a
 O. In that case what would become of the Savings Banks, in which the savings of the poor are deposited?
 A, They would psrish--every one of them.
 .. And what would become of all the other banks 'sssass'sss ss7V @
 A. They would perish also. a
 Q. And what would become of the pensions to wounded soldiers, and to the willows and children of those soldiers who have been killed Government would have no money and, in "a
 Q. Isthis Seymour " conservative" in regard to the Union as he is in regard to our lives and property?
 A. He is. e.'e
 0. How does he propose to '" conserve' the Union? A e1-1 a.o. ,s1s a4a t.
 A. By permitting the Southern States to de- strcy the Uuion. .5 .a
 o. 1.-the Union were broken ints two pieces, what would follow? .4 x ,s.a5
 A. It would soon be broken into fifty pieces.
 0. What would follow next? ~ sassse.
 A. Universal ruin. a4 II s
 Q. And am to understand that bloodshed, and repudiation, and disunion, and universal ruin constitute !" conservation ?" a
 A. Yes. Not the old kind, but the new kind -the copper-headed kind, invented by Hait- ford Convention" number two. 1
 0. For what has this Seymour been dstin- guished? A. Chiefly for drawing salaries from this State and from the United States.
 Q. Has this Seymour been soldier?
 A. Yes. It was either he or General Scott that conquered Mexico. He is known all over the town of Hartford as "The Hero of Chepultepec.' .., s..r...
 Q. Certainly then he must sympathize. with the soldiers who fight for the old flag?
 A. Not at all
 Q. Does he not at least sympathize with the men from his native State who bore that nag so bravelY at Roanoke and Newborn
 A. No. .z .ts ssaa '-@ sa
 Q. Nor with those who battered down Pu- laski and fought and bled at James Island 1?
 A. No. .. Q. N.rwi,h those brave fellow, vh defeat ed Breckinridge at Baton Rouge?
 A "a, =T saf k4-.f Ef
 Q. Nor with those who won the day for the Stars ani Stripes at Bayou Iafcu che?
 Q. Nor with those other gallant sons oi Connecticut who stormed the stone bridge at Antietam, and 50 gave victory to McCrsllan? { Q. Nor with these others whs stemmed so gloriouslY the tide of disaster at Fredericks burg? aaas 9asi sss sas sa !. A. No. ta, gar s ssaa
 O. With whom, then, does this Seymourl 9sa A. With the enemies of the " dear old hag" everywhere with all the Southern traitors 1 who hate it, and with all the British aristocrats who hate 1t, and with everybody who hates it. | Q. What proof exists that this Seymourl who was once soldier, is willing 10 see the dear old flag" disgracsd7 aa a .ssl e1 d
 A. His speeches and his lette 8. He is the | open, unblashing friend, advocate and ally of the men who fight against the flag, and who | insist that all its stars" shall be plotted out' and all its 'sstripes erased. # saN tass e
 Q. And this man is the "conseryatiyen con. didate for Govefn0rin che patriotic old State of Connecticut sgf sfssssssgssssb ssza .s
 A Yes. This mar is the !" couservative'' for Governor in the patriotic old State of Connecticut. ggs jss ass veg q ai asal
 The Democratic Platform. sg a
 {" Wsare against tse soar. The elections in other States have not been understood by the, President. Tzsrs Aa0e 5ssu too many Wat Democrats ehosen. When Thomas H. Sey- mour is elected, tse Rresident:.UM u''derssd'sd $ s.uaa saas a.saas. .-H F: Bar6en. at hs last Hwttord concesfion. z
 Yes; he will understand that 1t means civil var in Connecticut, that 1t means resistance to the gosernment that 1t means rspudiation of the public debt, that it means 1'aEAsos.
 Coksunr7Iox The Medical Reporter says that consumpfiYe patient, now under treat- mont E taking cream With better effect kban