Fremont journal. [volume] (Fremont, Sandusky County [Ohio]) 1853-1866, 1863-10-02

Sandusky county, Ohio, Court ofCommon Pleas.
Hannah Culver, and William W. Culver her husband
Plaintiffs,
versus
Eli D. Cooper William whitmore, William White Napo
leon White, Daniel ii. Allen Rachel Allen, Samuel
Yancer, Ellen Yancer, John Baker, Catherine Da-
ker, Elias Parker and unknown owners of the
north half of the north east quarter of section
number twenty three township number four range
number sixteen, in Sandusky county, Ohio, and
others, Defendants.
TJNIIE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS, William Whit.
i more, William White, Napoleon White, Daniel II
Allen, Rachel Allen, Samuel Yancer Ellen Yancer, John
Baker, Catherine Baker, Elias Parker, d the unknown
of the north half of the northeast quarter of
ton number twenty three, in township number four
range number sixteen, containing eighty OF land
more less in Sandusky county, State Of Ohio, are hereby
notified: That the twentysixth day Of August A. D.
thousand eight hundred and siXtythree, the said
Hannah Culver and William W. Culver, her husband
filed in the Office of tho Clerk of the Court of Common
Pleas in and for said county, petition against them and
others, and which is now pending; the substance and
prayer of which is:
That said HaI nah Culver was the owner in fee simple
the undivided onefourh part OF said eighty tract
land and had also dover right in the whole thereof
that she and her said husband filed in said Court Their
petition for partition thereof and the assignment OF
dover therein, which was ordered to be done by said
Court at the March term thereof, A. d. one thousand
eight hundred and hfy and was DONE or attempted To
DONE and confirmed at the next succeeding term of said
ment Ofdower and confirmation thereof in this
First-ln said order and assignment said land is des-
cribed being in range number fifteen, when in truth
and in fact and in the petition therefor 1t is and is des-
0Fibed as being In range number sixteen
Second-That the commissioners appointed to make
said partition and assign said dover and by therreport
set of to said Hannah Culver only six In fee simple
her fourth part Of said tract of land when in truth
and in fact they expected and intended that she should
have thirteen and onehaf OF the west end OF said
tract in fee simple her onefourth Of said land subject
to her said dover.
Third-That said commissioners after assigning said
dover and describing said six awarded and assigned
the residue Of said eighty of land to the defendants
in said petition for PARTITION when In truth and in fact
they intended and expected the said Hannah Culver TO
have said west thirteen and onehaf acres in fee simple
and also her dover right part Of which dover II
intended should cover part Of said thirteen and one
half acres
Said petition prays that said may be corrected and
that the said Hannah Culyers title to the said west hr
teen and oneha In fee simple he quieed against
the defendants and for other proper relief.
The defendants required to answer said petition on
or before the fourteenth day Of November, A. D. one
thousand eight hundred and sxty-three, or the same
will be taken as confessed and Judgment entered accord
VI BUCKLAND & EVERETT,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
September 4, 1868. 95w7 Pr. fee, si5 90