The New York herald., 1863-10-13
rhe Gurowski Llber suit.

VFrOm tne w W0e0tugt0Q lOJettlRouCor, OCt lz
On SATURDAY. morning, In the District q Columbia 6u.
prema Court sitting crinsi coort The case Of the
United States against Adam Gurowssl. indicted on The
charge Of publishing libel On William Hunter, Chief
Clerk n tho State Department, was continued.
Friday, Chief Justice Cartier was on the bench
AoS Ca y hsys 81 proved 10 Sis S
exstence OF certain proof sheets and tho possession OF
them ~ The defendant. gaze tho following written notice
oe p,oas,ss ssss. "a ne
OF % & a.nset aud s
pposs or bes read In shc case Of the United States
sar Il Se D.as q c0"ts ns for The TRIAL
NJ Brsdicy stated that the osr Wa semewhas odi.
fed FRIDAY Yesterday he offered 20 prove suas enc
not the proof Sheets the substance He stated that
OF the proof shects contained the tiepaee"biary
from March, 1851 70 November lSsxp ins cannot o.
presented by the deondaut IN septcmber 1857 The libel
master 10 specific In specific FORM specific aile-
cation Of q specific libel and must b 20 proved. ~
The Court stated that tho question whether the
notice. presented during the pending Of the sria s n
NJ Bradley read from Greeneaf the notice
should be pvesented before tho OF the
to sho tSas 4 should % presented not only before
tho or the trtai. but reasonable time
shod be given for the defendant TO produce IT,
The Court then stated thai better notice should be
George R.sd.ll tessaed J. am an apprentice With Mr..
me to know whether the publication progressing he
70 hurry II up; he said we were TOO slow; Il was
Mr. Carfngton put the indictment In tho hands Of the
Witness and after the wtness had read he asked him
whether he read thai In tho work
Have you seen or road the books
William II. Moore testified: am printer; know tho
defendant no came 10 last August year aud asked
10 call at the state Department him; went "
the seate Department: him shere be told that
other Adam Gvrcwssi ~ saw Soot this sninS ."
Mr. BesterI recoRnzc the book similar 70 those
which We have for sae was paid for them they sold
Henry Chase never had any conversation with Mr.
0uroWski since september last
torney OF wtness who has testified and nterrogAting
him ooncernng the same facts and circumstances TO
Wil!lam Hunter testified IL am chief clerk IN the De-
partment of State: have been there twelve years.
appointed BY Daniel webster d. not know wish
parmeut but always avoided him the char
acssr he bore do noe know hts employment; suppose
shat he temporary clerx Count Gurowski was he
was there 20 translate foreign papers that was hts bust
II no ono else the United States could trans
iats: know no other man by the namo Of aurowski.
Mr. Brndley then stated that evidence boon pro-
duced TO provo that the defendant s guilty OF the alleged
bsl Tho prosecuting Attorney argues 70 show that be-
ls62, and hurried up work the press was
therefore, the author OF book entitled "Dary from
now osss 70 put the book a. eviaeacc whou. Connect
isg Oount Gurowsk with the composifsou or publication
thereof ~ rl 'l t-nl lln-I.' sI
whether the book admissible evidence In court IL
sucient TO know thai the book contsined tho libel
charged In the Indictment He had prove the aufhor
ship IL proof suncient 70 know that the book had
large circulation IN the city OF Washngon o
the Count 0urowsk importing on ~ facs 70 Be Nh work.
u n possible, but not st all probable, that The work
forgery. 1-nH 1l.ft -o lUpa llrilfi3 .
me Count In he city during Me circulation of The
work Ne w.s In the bookstorss Of the city during its
Mr. Bradley stated that the rst time IN his life
10 ever heard proposition mous4rous. A wUrk 10
published with certain name % ~ face shs doig
mated aushorship-ergo: . man bearing . similar nane
h guilty a the hbsom mnsser contained IN the work.
There not aytois OF psoof show that the defendant
10 The oty ~ tho time, that be know beng
sold, though N sttsmps 10 prove such mads. lN
Chez Justice Garter delivered charge 70 the Jury
which, ~ oonsdssab.s length and with characteristic
ability, be declared that the question simply whether
shss portion relating 70 she libel charged In sss ndios
Tbs Dssrics Attorney wished 10 krsw shs case could
not Be postponed 10 enable him ths pabhsrs
u ths bcck from New York and Boetoa. 1f I..r0i L
Mr.. Bradley o6ectsd md the ODurs susssissd the o.
TAs Dssos Attorney tAsa dssirss 70 sasss Bsls pros,
which the court ruled w. inpoib.s under ths crcsn
Tbs jury thsn rendered . verdict of NOT guilty.
II.IH rNI' -------~-------
ou City Intsliigsnce.
I'M Fmn Rsgnxxr new Yoex CAvAiay-farrcrsos
AID PnDmrAnoSs AZ Ms suvnxm Avmvs AnusAl--ihs
Arss regiment New York Cavalry. Lisutsnans Colonel
uiaAun conmAndAG. was inspsctsd Iass evening ~
~ ssvesth Avsnus Arssoai BY 0snsran Spsor sad
Hall ne rsgimcat has just bsn furnishsd with
shs brssch oadias carblnss, and were Isss even
ing Instructed ia Shsir ~. Aftss ths inspsosion
she rsgt0sat vas formed Int . hollow sQuare,