Worcester daily spy. [volume] (Worcester [Mass.]) 1850-1888, 1863-07-09

,v,su,vorox n n Jur,, 90 1899
usssrs n R,,,.cbo,d Do,,;J A tLo,,cL Gso
MIS- n V pa,tIs,, ~ r corl1on Eoh,
n VIII n a IThiIc ~ n III 1,sron.
be-, Iono r ~ V6;,e Ceo ~ B.ndIeto,,
leo G,,,re,... Ill., D Mn L,,,,ss
p Ha,.,;e ~ u,,toL;ns 1L,,.s.T pasI
40 y, ~. I,;,,,,or u n r. PHI To1,;,
Scbos1e,. '1-''''''S' -''10'O''''' 11N''''
G@atI'',,,o, NJ ..,I,,.;, * A., O,,;o
don,nnrotin stata oonvont;on ,yh;at 'o, Unio
sont mo toSottor ,r;th ,,o"r ;ntrndmctorv a,,J
closing REMARKS being in nosition and argn.
~ ia 10 "ei'e -" PT'i'-oH '''u al
the Jemnrr3tit n,aot;ng "t AIhanv N v
rof,r v,,,, tn nv, ros9onsa IN ia lottar 40
,,nn,in,, r,nst ~ tha n,;n,s in tLo fo,n,er
Tbis rasrnns, va, i,,,,I ,,,,d j., -
,.',,. r,,r.,rJ,, ,nd daS;ra M ,,,ona H.,
that If he msed viii acchrarv Tn a sin@Ie
raod;r,o of ,.o,,r ,nr,orl,s nil, d;s,n,as,d
nna ;naoorrao,, i, ,,attor ,vh;oI, 7 sW,,,,,s1
,,,,, +,ol, f,,,Y ,La+ ,,n,n, t. /; loo II
yo,, sa,. .Trho ,,ndarsi,,nod aro mail -
agree With vnu in the o1inion won have ow.
nTessed that The constitution IL ,Iifferan+ in
i;mo ~ ;psnrrontio, or in,nsion from, ,rhn. l.
10 j., Ina ~ ,,aor,o and rnhlin saorr;t,, -.
,.,,,',, 81 49,, - LII -, h.
bo,,, ,,,t o,,,,,.oa.,,d tro on;r,;on
10 that H.
IL g 4
IT,, ;,ri,,,t t,, III a,t,.'
f.r, ,,h,. T. :; :, rlp,f,,d 80
49, - - VI PE"Ge
- - L. H. -:
'l'lPiy ~ Yiie 'iOii
10y ~ IN 1ii ~ 'ne 0iie O''e i0
may nv. NC uohc III 'no O''iei'
uisilhe W waste "oru oh invreiy per
Sol'"i punt ou' 1 must Respectfully assure
you .na' you VIII lnu yourselves at lluiI
oAouiu yoi e.ol seeN lol e'luSnoe " prove
Your assumption t'lat opposed IN discussion
O0i0,e 'ne PeoPle TIC Poiicy Vi inc NAeAlcah
wal ca.
Tu gay, hApu"Se rum Tue coilS'ltu'ioi'
'nio ilui,'%'ioh upo.. Ihe power Vi congress 10
SUSPEND oI tne Wilt oa N"oe"S corpus, anu yet 'he
otner guarantees Oh personal liberty would re-
man rln unon".9eu' 'ouDlleSS ImiS clause
VI u,e coHS'i.ut!oh' lillproperly calieu, as
tnlhN' e'i'itatloh upon 'he power OF con-
eiVes; WHY eAPu"seu' tiie othei guarantees
""uiu ieiidi" '1e sdiilei DuC t'le question Is,
not nv" muse 5u"' "!'les "ouiu stanu WIN
,.V ciause remaining IN IT, IN cases or rebel
Hoi Vi INV "sloh NV ilnS t'e Puoi'c SAFETY
~ 'he iioei'y coulu og ii'uuiseu u eApunSlng
'n"t ciduse' ietter anu spirit reaily Ilihk the
S1nS'i'u'i"i'ai argument "oulu NC Win you;
ny eeiI1a al VIC" On ''iS qusst,oii was s'ateu
u. .ne Alo'iv iesPoHSe, anu Hehce 10 not
ste'9 - iiG" oy 'ue t'ldl' as seems 10 me-
ene "a .io ~ oi '1Io0s"o to'P"S Is '''e
~: winch 'iie u"' ',''ieS "
p oi?pnIl iloIity "ie conSer'su anu "laue
az W t'le "'i,
~ .''As NV 10 t'ie i"G' ''i"' WI V"iianuIs
- a. e"I o"o III 4"09'oH' ""u'i ''ie
,'t w., y, ANY "a" 5etS Sd" noI Where 10 go
,i 20 LUZ ~ .'ie 'o''S'i-
;stf ~ S' ~ ~ VI ''''O'"' w pro
i,,lI;l ~ ~ "ien IL N"'o9 VI le
; :; - '''' ''Si'" Wv P""iiO '''e'J may io
~ '
" "'N III 'uD9''"T ' -" ie'''el e"li3 tiHHh
'un' una! o'erfiue All the guarahteeu rights
Vi i,ul' iuudiS' On tle pea vi conserving tne
Pup,ic s"iety' "i'ei' may CnooSe 10 say tne
Puo'iI S"iIV Itqulies It, nus question: u
'esteu q t'ie piraSeoiogy clrcuiateu 10 repre-
sent NE DIS Struggling ior an arDitr"iy person
d' PreroS"tNe' Is eI'''er sl'hpy question
"''y Si,'ii ueoiue' vi an ann .'i' "0o'"y
siiail ueclue' wilat the puol'c salely uo1S re-
quire III case Oh reoellioh or invasion. Inc
CONSTITUTION conteihpldtes the question as
hkeiy 10 occur lor declsion, nut II does not
expressly ueciife VINO Is 10 deciue IT, by
necessary implication, when reDeillon or IN
Vasloh comes, the decision Is to be made from
tlihe 10 time; ana thlhK the man whom, tor
the tlhe' tne people nave, under the conStl-
tuition, made the commander -ln-cmef OF their
army and navy, Is the man who holds the
power and bears the responsibility OF making
1t. IL he uses the power justly the same peo'
pie VIII probably Justify him; II he abuses 1t,
he is In their hands, to be dealt with by all the
modes they have reserved to themselves In
the constitution.
The earneStness with which you insist that
persons can only IN times OF rebellion be law
fully dealt with Ill accordance with the rules
for criminal trials and punishments IN times OF
peace, induces me to add wOld to what L
SAID on that point IN the Albany response.
GU clalii1 thai men may II they choose, en-
barrass those whose duty IL Is 10 combat 81
ant reDelil0h' ana theh De uealt WIN only IN
turn as II there were no reDeIlion: Inc consu-
tutloh Hseli REJECTS thls view Inc military
arrests anu ue'ehtohS " n nave peeh lhade'
lncludlhg NOSE OF MT Vaiianuisham' wnlch
are not dlHereht III prlhclple from the otner,
nave oeeh lor preFeutloh' anu NOT lor PUNISH
ment-as lhJuhctlohs 10 stay lhJuIy-aS pro-
ceeuih9s 10 Keep ne peace-ahu hehce' IKE
ProceeaileS III sucii CASES. anu ior ilke rea-
SONS they nave not "eeh accompaniment! IN
uictlien's' vi 'rlals ny Juries' hor' III Single
o%oe' ny any Pu"!e,i'nel' "nateFer oeyohu
Tii"' 70 puteiy i'ciuentai " us PreEeutIoh'
VI III MI
as ""S " ent trguly u
.nG n'ii4'l1 ,eA 'ioe o'iS, "uu tNe i,ou'uea'ioH
" IL ""o maui 10 leSs ulsaSreeaole liloue 10
MN Vi securing the same prevention
am uhaoie TO perceive an Insult 10 Ohlo IN
tne case oi MI Vaiiahdlgham' Quite surely
notnlrg OF the sort was or is intended. L was
Wholly unaware that MT. Vallanulgham was,