New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1863-10-29

itated TO the faciIe pen and genial intellect OF
thot gentleman. Its bitter libels, rancorous per-
sonalties. erroneous statements of issues, iaise'
hood to Democratic doctrines and candida'es'
blind devotion to the interests Of the city rail-
road plunderers, ct I'd genus omns, forming tne
balance of its editorial page-all these matters
have been attributed to another pen.
We call Mr.. Halls attention to this mat
fer. in order that he may see how very near
TO his own door the responsibility will rest, II
this rattle business be not dealt with by him IN
the same magniloquent spirit which actuated
his prosecution of Judge Sydney Stuart We
would also at the same time call bis attention
TO series of articles which have appeared IN
The Journal of Commerce on the subject OF the
purity and independence Of the Judiciary; and
TO that article in particular, published on the
10Th day of the present month, which crltieises
an opinion delivered from the Bench Of the
Supreme Court of this city (Mr. Justice Clerke
dissenting), in favor Of Mr.. Jacob Sharp's claim
against the City for damages to the amount OF
$40, OOO Mr.. Jacob Sharp has been in partner
ship with the "next friend" who took so deep
an interest in securing Mr.. Garvin's nomination,
so far back, certainly, as the first inception Of
the Broadway Railroad scheme. MIR. jacob
Sharp and this "ncxt friend" have figured
together in every city railroad scheme OF
the last half dozen years; and 1t is
capable of easy proof by reference to the Law
Reports, that, in the last grand broadway
attempt, these brothers, beautiful in their lives
have not, in the death of that scheme been
divided. From the " Bulkhead at Manha'ta
Vile" down 10 the " Wall-street Ferry lease,
every link in this most interesting history can
be supplied. We beg Mr.. Hall to read The
Journal Of Commeroe attcntiyely; also The
n L. Atlas the raciest, htsrtest, bodest, and
"best posted" Democratic paper ever published
in this city. We would also refer him TO the
" Now-York Practice Reports" OF his friend,
Mr. Nathan Howard, jr.
To conclude this matter: Mr.. Andre Fro
mont a gentleman Of honor, believed 20 be per-
fcctly unimpcachable. allowed his name to be
used in card Of denial in this controversy;
tha, denial being bascd on trivial errors of de-
tail in our first hurried statement, and on mi,-
representations made to Mr.. Fromcn, by m
ltcrrs,rd parties ~ 10 the motives which lad
prompted the use of his name in our columns.
! We instantly corrected the errors OF detail,
reiterated IN The broad facts q The case, offered
/ tlr names of witnesses 10 whom Mr.. FTomcn'
him ~ lad told he story many times, and
ircc ,hAt rc.icra'ion nothing public has been
| i,srd from VI. Fromeui. and no'hing VII he
! N-ssrs. Cornell aud Tweed send us an affidavit
dcug.ns their connection with matter which
! they were never by NJ accufcd ol having en-
e.r,c-cd. nor were they accused. clihc
lby II, Day Book or iiias, Of having done mor'
than allowed The Dee at tleir Office for tAc ocge
Imonial 81 settlement" The card of VI. \. oakcl
Hall j. DE result Of an exaggerated notion q
biz own Importance. We pledge him our word
that until the appearance Of that card in Ih'
Herald two dAys ago, his name had nevci
occurred 10 us with reference 10 this transac
ton. Now tina, It docs occur, shall we comics.
that it by no means tends to improve the
SAVIOR Of this unfrauant affair