Cleveland morning leader. [volume] (Cleveland [Ohio]) 1854-1865, 1863-10-29
BACKUS & NOBLE,
Plaintiffs Attorneys.
In Common Pleas-Ae-
ton to Quiet The.

OuJahOBa OOuntysj aon 70 Nolet lIae'
Jennsst Belts, plaintiff,
against
Esther Brennan, LaW-
renee Lawn, Mary
LAWN, Edward Du-
shane, Catherine Du-
shane, Edward sla-
ter, Bridget Slater,
Elizabeth Brennan
and tAnn Brannan,
defendants.
NoTICE.-The above named defend
IN ants, Esther Brennan, Lawrence Lawn, Ed
ward Dushane, Catherine Dushane, Edward Sls-
ter, Bridget Slater, Elizabeth Brennan and Ann
Brennan will take notice that the Plaintiff has
filed her petition IN the Court OF Common Pless,
IN SAID county against them and said Mary La
Yln, stating therein as follows, that said Law
renee Lawn executed and delivered 10 the Plain
nh his note or bond under seal, March 9th, 1853,
promising to pay the Plaintiff 81 200 with inter-
est at ten per cent per Annum, and with his wife,
Mary Lawn, on the same day executed and de-
llVered TO Plaintiff mortgage deed as security
for SAID note or bond, on the following described
premises
Situate in Cleveland township in said State Of
| OHIO, and known as lot number SO in the map Of
| John N. Woolsey's subdivision Of lots number
l63 to l67, and OF parts oflots 156 to l62 all in
elusive, OF the original city or two acre lots, and
/ and bounded as follows Beginning at 3 point
66feet north Of the intersection OF Chestnut and
huIrson streets, thence northery along the
/ casterly line Of Murson street, one cham
| to stake marked s. 81, a. thence
easterly st right angles with Muirson
/ street and parallel with Chestnut street
] two CHAINS to stGke-thence at right an giles
! with the last mentioned line one chain south
/ WsFdiy-thence WestWardly on the line OF lot 81
| TO the place Of beginning, be the same more or
| less; which mortgage deed is recorded in Cuya-
| hoga county Records, volume 6s, pages $50, 24O
| and 24l that said Jennett Belts filed her petit
! ton against said Lawrence and Mary Lawn,
| among others, in the Court Of Common Pleas OF
| Cuyahoga county, Ohio, February 1st, 1859, rep
| therein
| lien on said premises, that its condition had
! been broken by said LAWNS failure to pay said
note, which it was given 70 secure, that said La
wins owed her LOO with interest at 10 per cent
I from March 9th, 1853, and asking account to be
| taken Of her said clam, that she might have
/ judgment for the amount found due her, that
( said premises might be sold and the proceeds
! SppneI on her said debt, and the prioritle5 Of
I lien therein determined that said Court, at the
February term thereof, A. d. 1859, after all the
defendants in said suit had failed to answer, and
the Court had taken account Of plaintiff s claim
and heard the proofs, gave the plaintiff judgmen
! for S2,05I 70, and costs, and ordered said prem
ises to be sold 10 apply thereon; that sai4
sale took place as ordered and in accordance
| with the Law, February 4th, 1850; said premises
beng sold to plaintiff for SS68, and Wss re-
turned to said Court and approved by the same
/ at the February Term, 1890, and deed ordered
/ TO be given plaintiff, which was executed and de-
lvered to plaintiff on the 18th Of March, 1850, by
Henry G. Abby, Master Commissioner OF SAID
Court, and is recorded in Cuyahogs County Rec
ords, volume los, pages al and ~; that plain
tin took possession OF said premises under sald
deed, has retained 1t ever since, and still re.
mains in peaceable possession thereof and said
petition goes on to state that after the date o
said mortgage deed from said Lawns to the plain
tiff, and prior to the proceedings above recited
to wit, August l3, 1855, said LAWNS conveyed bl
warranty deed their interest in said premises K
Patrick Brennan, who then received the lega
title thereto and retained the same till his death
and that he held it st the time said proceeding
above recited took place in said Court which
deed is recorded in OuyahogE County Records
volume 81, pages 339 and $40; that By some over
sight said Patrick Brennan, who was anecessarJ
party 20 said proceedings IN Court above related
was not made party thereto and that, in conse
quence, after the termination Of the same, h'
still claimed, and apparently possessed an inter
est in said premises adverse TO plaintiffs title
that said Brennan died in the spring Of 1858, a
plaintiff believes intestate, leaving as his heirs
at-lsT the shove named defendants Mary LAWN
Catharine Dushsne, Bridget Slater, Eh1abetl
Brennan and Ann Brennan, upon whom said de
oedents interest in said promises, whatever
might be, descended, and In whom 1t now rests
subject however, 10 the dover interest Of SAT-
defendant Esther Brennan, widow Of said dece
dent; that sad heirs -atlaW are also the childre
OF said deeedent, and are Of ull age, and tha
said defendants, Lawrence Lawn, Edward Du
snane, and Edward Slater, are husbands Of sal
defendants, Mary LAWN, CathRrine Dushane an
Bridget Slater, respectively and that none Q
said defendants have any valid claim or interes
in said premises except the right to redeem tn
same By paying in f1il the debt found due tn
plaintiff from said defendant Lawrence Lawn, b.
said gourt as aforesaid, which debt still remain
unpaid, 30 far as it was not satisfied by the sale
plaintiff OF the mortgsged premises and sal
petition asks that the defendants be required +
answer and set forth ther interest in said prem
ises, that they or some one Of them be ordere
to pay or cause TO be paid TO the plaintiff, With
time to be fixed by the Court, said sum Of $209l
70 with interest st 10 per cent. from said Februs
~ 2Ist, 1859, and said costs taxed S26.O6, and
default Of said payment, that plaintiff may hav
decree debSrring the defendants forever fror
redeeming said premises, and declaring them
have no farther estate or interest therein What
ever and giving 10 plaintiff such further relief
IN the Judgment offhe Court Is equitable.
The defendants above notified are required
sppear snd answer on or before the 18th day
November, 1853, or said petition viii be take
BACKUs B NOBLE,
SApt 1874 Plaintiffs Attorneys.