New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1863-03-18

We.estabiishn,c Of slevery.

| 10 the Editor Of The n. Y. Tribune.
SIR: It's utterances have loEg been my political
gospel aud hence ind with some anxiety either IHt
TmBusu falling into error myself falling from grace
In your answer to Mr. Potts, you to hold that az
Immediate submission Of tho Rebels would jGty tho Pre'
dent In tho hope Of prombed freedom In the
a,ve and the. OF actual enanchement local law
declaring their reensavement would Do beyond 'hs reach OF
the General Government.
Fethaps my intense anxiety 10 avoid ng back into the
dsms darsne Of Slavery dime my 20, cannot re-
| frsr from suggestings
The Constitution recognized Slavery - az organized
nsgton but no. tho hight to create 1t where II had not
then on eIience Else why 10 the importation Of heemen
from Aca than the removal 81 slave from
one State TO another and why Ia not the establishment OF
Slavery free Territory much guaranteed - tss con
tinuanes Of II in Slave State submit because In the one
os,o the Cop.,aon found and len It in tho other 1t
did no, find II. and il doe, not carry IT,
That the natural state Of 10 ono Of hsedon And
only municip law reduce him 10 state Of Slavery
The General Government IL bound recognize aud pro-
tec all State rights that have E0t been expressly uanteF
to By the Con,eton and y It does not recognize or
protec, bis.nJ any other great local. though Icss'ed
wkodno bee4us did no, eIt, q, its sdopslon and In
violation Of the h.hlaw and therefore, not within the con-
teup!s,i the Constitution.
Tho Rebels forfeited all their rights under the consliiu-
by ,h.I rejection Of H. aud their sitempi to ubveh the
Gsusr. Government and this made sOr the declaration
Of freedom which could not otherwise have been properly
Issued.
The moment the weight Of uanelpsi law "a removed
from he rise, into freeman. add the na'.sr having
forfeited hs municipal sh, hold him in bondage BY
the great crne Of and rebellion, more regain
that RICH, BY returning his allegiance than he restore
any other s-ls Of ell natural night tas to bis personal
freedom from iuprsonmenil. which has besp forfeited BY
! erime-by ess'ins to continue hi' criminal coSaac
Permit me TO suggest, thon whether recalling the PrOes
would be jet land Il ia'. then not hshD to loyal
who have sustained the President under every Trial and
whose dearest hope ed whole reward have been this
se from the danger Of bUDsrsn and rebellion or TO Reoe'
who condemned and dehed ke the warning and tho Proes
and therefore Justly deserve the punishmcntor to
the who have seespsed" BY ssssns the Of
tho Union Whenever possible and at least by "sbsaipns
hom violence" according to ito Injunction Perhaps except
Tor hi, promise they would have cast oG their shAehle'
before opportunity Loot They aio serve who stand
snd waltz
IT, a. DEEM the Rebels had forfeited their nigh. to hold
sres and be protected aud the Proclamation was mere
public declaration Off, and that they consequently free
mon then South Csrons IL today one Of the United
States h.. a. Msm,chussa Would not then be Jos,
.pusnt 10 tho Constitution her Legislature should
an Get reducing twohirds Of the Inhabitants to slaves a.
tho sane were done in MaiHel And would tho General
Government 10 guaranteeing to thai State republican form
Of Government" nsleh eoar.e were permitted
The Consultation has sometime, found cbstels and permit
led tein 10 remln such II has fousd men and per
United them 10 be made ctat,s'
ana one, no, tie STAKEHOLDER himself preepds
thai black but only slaves ehs"' Every one fee
Sc man. Aud Tepubicsn form Of government recognize,
night. Ia oil. mon, aud re'pses them.
Ps. con.ider whether this Hubieon between tho barber
and despotss Of the past ard tho glorious hopes and
freedom OF the future 10 not forever crossed.
WIN W. NILES. No. Wall street