The New York herald., 1863-11-21

which Judge NoGunn dd not po moro o. css vo.cs III
(the sieaEor) d Mt dead h iasinnations Ito quoted
authorities SHOW tntt the Hoard has judicitI as
wet N uinilterial ioacrs the Hnard TRUST ~ ies
OF tho vo.es be III ana tb moment thsy begin
dee they become irticiai body f,r Tho counsel
who preceded him iabored 10 SHOW that lhey had 40
power ildee and vet sbering nake them Judge
OF what he sad. he (the spenGcrl called The aeut
o. the Board 20 decision o he Court OF Appeals 10 show
that they bsd judicial p0wer Their powers Eo .lnaipc1
we're rarity judical aud patty niastend lie an tei
Authority 70 show that tbc board Is not bound strictly TO
the rcurns presented to thcm, aud that the whole obct
o the law ths question is u make tho true numoeF Of
votes cast appear lie stated That he ID the advii tho
poll clerk that there 10 yosa cast for Judge No
Gum IN hs district t appears that there were t04 voe
cast os judge tho Court OF css in The disputed dis
trict Comparing with The votes the Judgcship Of
Tho SypeIior Govt and the deficiency the pumber OF
thsm II evident Chat the yoes for Judge hcCunn are
missing and tho votes aouay giv him arc nos report
ed II the Board sent he record ok because they wefe
AFRAID OF ther own oppontecs peruling themselves WAS
bgb tmo that the Board OF County (envassers should DO
abolished lie argued thai, from all the oifcumstancos
II appeared TINT Judge hcCunn did Dot receive all tho
20 him tho disputed district The Board could mol sead
back certificate for any purpose according 70 Mr. Ora
ham Tho proof before you that ono hundred ana SOW.
enty three votes cast FOR Judgs MconD ip This
Disputed district Upon h5 opponents theory tBo Board
could persons into oce who had not received tho
voles Of tho people no submitted that " tbe Board
committed an error ~ all ought 10 bo on tbe sdo OF
truth. and with sves TO gvo expression 10 tho wi Of
the people. t-
NJ Chatneid charged tn, Board taxe care that tho
who majority OF tno votes " the peopc ia
declared eiecteJ ineir duties wore manly ministerial
but partly judcia 10 hoped the Board above foar
fsvoF reward 'fhe poll list preserved for he par
Of having them 70 refer toor your guidance and
there wers seven votes more cast In the district
than thsre voters IN the district THIS was
Ss ,Sy SrF p ~ We % a. t.
10 mako the election cope.e tho whole ouober OF votes
given ia the disputed district must be roturHcd Why IL
there IS lear that Judge McCurn will Get the votes that
were cast for hun this sent back should not bescat
bsca aod the election completed The Board IN bavs
motive To- Shut the truth II Judge McCabn Is
ttled 10 certain number Of votes OF which error
may have devod hito, why sho ID oc not gel the bcnc
WIN 6 Noyes argued that MI. Bosworth Is corj.puod
N oce by tho ony record that tells truth concerning the
WI Of The people villa! authority a there ~ toice
oude 10 IT, Flo condemned be o0cicus Conduct Of tho
poll clerk who had made aHda,t OF the ncorrcclncas
Of returns, aod apc1cbog b9 surerols without even IN
gtaUon its likely Judge NcCGnn would have yotca
every district, but It is uoL ccr'ip, considering tho
ireaks OF Cie ballot boz ~ tbiS Cg lie cedid imagine
candid TO mo ran neteen thosatnd behind his ticket
receiving votes 4 d1l Tho Board haB positive
sVitence that sbe case ard be only evidence 1t eau
cOaslics--ths record
ghe chairman ncaj that the question before tho
Boaed was On sapcfvSot s'cwMts motion 8" 60 on with
the canvass on the retlfna before them
hr. ps-dy said there objection 10 pa5,H. tbe
melton as Mr.. Stewart was not tlcD IN has paoe
Tho motion beo; obect Oh 10 " laid ov'c tl no
Ar rurdS taeu moyea nat Go Hoacd adjourn till to
day at tpeIyo O'Clock ,nt IN The meantime bave tina
opinion ol counsel This mot on was ~ ~ccess
wa, tbeD taken oT hiteen mioutes
AFter tho retess supervisor ny oferco the o'lceog
t. twelve O'Clock 10 DAY
Resolved, That Mr row De reqtcalad 60 comoioi-
cate 10 t3s Board whether N h5 opnon, Is te rGsi
dujy oi this Board 10 seDd ihe B, t's spt Is
trict, eighth waso. back for correction.
ine Board toaotg CanYassei re,9enbst yssi .cdly
a. noon, Supsrv,sor Idtts ia tho char.
Ates remaining IN saia ga Zoe s's so houF. s.pos
sor TyKrp stated thal iaey had Dct to The opinion
os tho Cooperation Amae thot t tcd,sye hec,
ccved At haila.t tveys ald tiio bout had ar'9ed
and the opinion had not baeo communicated. he moved
"f focess o haif "a hour. The n o.icn carried
Conse pfeseot N .,oth aica. Oh tho reccJoe
day and tho i"Doy aod earnest looks of o oSitsf
the interest felt lathe proceedings
After he Tcccss he TiEsto, xnocenced THAI "a. iees
ta The ro un of -ui cryiSor Stewart copists
the canvass iac retafus betcfe tie bsri
Stcr. isor'fp moved o., az amendment TIM. @pcS
visor NserDap he author ed 20 gate tDe ,etarns
from lie ,pu;et dac,ct With tIe poi ce:Ss aDt ds
q, - csovssser. rcport e. The ,soarj.
che C,,IsNf. tb3u2n, ihs amspdnent oft Of orisr
Supervisor IyHo. again moved AR. Tweed'a amend
tncat, bat 10 ecgoewhat drsrenl .Gsge, sDd "
ador ted by ane TO tHj 81. aryiscs !tle and Davis
voting In tue negative
;he opinion ci the orpoeslion Co,ass vas tier real.
7, that tbs pow oc tho Board maoy nlus,s
ra, but that wterr OF cal nature appa
rent the Board exercise igioN powsrs % tnysstt
gate H..
,.,h adj ,.tr.,ad In lao at