Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1862-1865, 1863-12-31
COMMISSIONERS OFFICE,
4 Il -
w. O SCOTT.

By decree County Court Of HeneO County entered
ih day September 1885, in ehAncery suit therein pend
Jacob snead Mary snea d William blackburn Taylor g. Black
AV SrorhsS ~ Fraue VI aas and susan
Wle susan WarDntan enmA seatoni who before
WsrbhtAn Wlnam WAIbdtan WoodsOn X. NArbtAn, James
Franklin and Mary his we, VINO vas mary sneto,
Phillips and as vile WHO Eliza bnead Nathaniel Bridge
water and Nathaniel Glenn, PlAntns
w1sm snesd Thomas seAton and Mar q. his wife, Virginia
FlAekbu n iaAnt ehi OF NAh. BeIbudec Pat Iogeny,
and Lucy Een his vile who was Lucy ken blackburn William
Pps and susan wife, snead, Sinclair
Jane his WIFE, Jane sneal John sneAd, Alexander
al Item bel SntAd dgwAtsr, Jno GOOde, and Ag es
his Ni Agnes rdswaer, Eliza H. Douglass Sarah A.
DOuglss Marietta Douglass and Jas r. douglass samuel
Alley Betsy Ne Betsy Newman, Asa Mes man.
Ma6a NewmAa Henry K. shaw and arena his WIFE who was
Al ey MalVina Aey Crword Al ey and h4IthS Alley
chdren Of Rueben Alley aad MlA his wife, VINO was Maria
Newman, Fleming Newman, Watson Newman and harvey NeS
wife, who lethe Newman Joseph newman, Poly
water Francis NJ and Brdgwate children
Of william BdgWater osceasei "a h d. Pain VIM fatnan,
ko newman child Of Wm Newman, ed
Wman the Virginia blackburn Alexander sneAo George
w. sneHd Della SneAd, Harvey hewm m NAh Bdgwater Een
BrigwaIer francis NJ JgWAtef, Henrietta BndgWasr, no
exAnder Newman being infants under TIE age Of
BY Lotion N. Eett, their Ardan dd ttefn
ssgaed by the defend them 10 this suit and The
William Paman ng also an insn under me age
Court 10 defend him In this SUIT befendents
certain whether principal interest remans
sp1ed this cause Arising hon heproessds Of tbs sale o.
under former decree in he cause, and &c VII m
and Ia What proportions originally belonged that he
enquire whether the persons entitled 10 STA iund ana
n nave M appeared aud claimed their respective
t,ereof he dug or dead and AZ whether they
descendants heirs or dsvsess other
he kindIeI who already parties to the cause and
they have e descendants heirs devsees
the parties the cause any Of them or any persons
parties be entitled dstbaon Of said proportions
OF hem and the psrsops whom an tHe proportions
eaqure and report what terms any would be proper 70
the parties who may receive the said unclaimed fund.-
with o fGtufe restoration 70 most the claims any who
hereafter show better claim hero And the said com.
oner directed 10 appoint time and place for making said
enquiries publish notice thereby on week for four
weeks such newspaper or as ne may select which
81 II ecite the names Of re paroles originally entitled 10
said uad have and claimed and shall
require them may claim be their he distributes
deIsees forward said day and assert their claim
made b. them the 20 nnssorer viii proceed ols
baton thereof among those who may nos be paroles 10 The cause
OF who may show ourselves TO entitled The
shall be med equivalent to personal service OF
lice ppon parties the the said
affected report upOu al enquiries
with any matters Specially stated which deemed pert
By himself or which may berequrd TO be stated by
TIE parties Interested hsby that have xed on
nv ce in The city OF Richmond 10 mike the
ports by the Sres Id decree And the
children OF James sneAd aeeeAed, Bey who
Aney daughter toaherns Newman deceased asa Newman
and ahSa Newman, children Of Maria heSman deceased
married John Gordon and Charles cgWaer cndren
Of Agnes BagWser deceased Elizabeth SatSh A. NJ Mari.
and Jane, K Douglass ehdrn OF Ann Douas deceased;
those who have not appeared and claimed their shares Of the
fund undp0sed c0nsroi
cause to watch they originally entitled. they any
nisy their heirs devseS
CURED forward the 2st day Of January 1894 at my
and their claims SAID fund.- default such
claim being made by the shall proceed TO report
anoug who bepartes cause
who may show themselves to be entitled thereto.
THOMAS j. EVANS,
de1S-w4E 60 CommssIoner In Onancerv
IN CHANCEhY.--At Rules held IN the
Il clerks once, Monday, the Jh day OF December 1863
Maria d. Fleming, PAlntiR
against
Lewis ID. Fleming and Thompson Fleming Defendanta
The object Of this suit Is 10 sell the land In
ngs mentioned belonging 10 tie estate OF Nancy
and appearing AFFIDAVIT hlei in the the deen.
dAn d. Fleming and Thompson Reming are montreal
dents OF this STATE motion Of the plaintiff It ordered the
absent nonresident defendants do appear within month after
publication thereof and do what necessary 10 protect their
interest In this and that copy Of this order published
In The Richmond VILE, pub shed In the city Rich