Fremont journal. [volume] (Fremont, Sandusky County [Ohio]) 1853-1866, 1863-10-16
NOTICE.

sandusky county, Ohio, Court ofCommon Pleas
Hannah Culver, and William W. Culver, her husband,
Plaintiffs, lTH
Eli D. Cooper, William Whitmore William White Napo-
leon White, Daniel H. Allen, Rachel Allen, Samuel
Yancer, Ellen Yancer, John Baker, Catherine Ba-
ker, Elias Parker, and unknown owners Of the
north half of the north east quarter of section
number twenty ythree, township number four, ran 90
number sixteen, in Sandusky county, Ohio, and
others, Defendants.
HNHE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS, William Whit
i more, William White, Napoleon White, Daniel H.
Allen, Rachel Allen, Samuel Yaneer, Ellen Yancer John
Baker, Catherine Baker, Elias Parker and the unknown
Of the north half of the northeast quarter of
tion number twenty-three, in township number four
range number sixteen containing eighty land
more less in Sandusky county State of Ohio hereby
one thousand eight hundred and sxtv-hree tha ss;d
Hannah Culver and William W. Culver, her husband
dled in the Office of the Clerk of the Court of Common
Pleas in and forsaid county petition against them
others, and which is now pendngi the substance and
prayer of which is; fifi5H
That said nah Culver was the owner in fee simpe of
the undivided onefourh part said eighty tract Of
land and had also dover right in the whole thereof
that she and her said husband filed in said Court their
petition for partition thereof and the assignment Of
dover therein, which ordered to be done by said
Court, at the March term thereof A. D. thousand
eight hundred and fifty and was DONE or atempted IN
DONE and confirmed at the next succeeding term of said
Court That there error in said partition and assign
ment ofdower and confirmation thereof, in this
First-In said order and assignment said land is des
eribed as beIngin range number hteen when in truth
and in fact and in the petition therefor it is and des
Second-That the commissioners appointed to make
said partition and assign said DOVER by their
set OF to said Hannah Culver only six in fee simple
fourth part of said tract of land when in TRUTH
and in fact they expected and intended that she should
have thirteen and oneha acres of the west end of said
tract in fee simple her oneourh of said land subject
TO her said dover
Third7That said commissioners after assigning said
dover and describing said six acres awarded assigned
the residue Of said eighty of land to the defendants
ia said petition for PARTITION when in truth and in fact
they intended and expected the said Hannah Culver
have said west thirteen and onehaf in fee simple
and also her dover right part of which dover II
intended should cover part Of said thirteen and
half acres.
Said petition prays that said may be corrected and
that the said Hannah CuVers title to the said thir
teen and onehaf in fee simple be queted against
the defendants, and for other proper relief.
The defendants required to said petition
before the fourteenth day of November, A. n. one
thousand eight hundred and sixtythree, or the same
will be taken confessed and judgment entered accord
ing to the prayer thereof.
BUCKLAND EVERETT,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
September 4, 1868. Bowl Pr fee, $40 90 a.iIIn b..