Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1862-1865, 1863-01-23
COLONEL III. g. HARMAN.-Me rubbish.
ADJT ANb INsP'R GsN's OFFICE,
RICHMOND, December Is, 1869.
GENERAL ORDyKs, /

GrsEnAL osnSNs,
l. At Enquiry convened Stanton Va December
81, sG2 by virtue OF Special Orders No. 2IS paragraph NIX,
Aulsn and Inspector Generals Once Richmond
report upon charges lmpuiacns against
CvLueM T. arrasu, bsi Regiment vlrnii Volunteers r.
Va Enrollrg oferi tie place following
rep and finding Of facts duly made aud published
| for TIE informs lon Of alt concerned:
H-REF6ST AND TISIISG or The CorAr.
The Court having considered tue evidence adiuced,
respectfully report a Immediately after rs organization, be
Recorder addressed To the Hon A. H. IT, stuart request
Log interview, for the purpose Of obaning specific inT on
the desired Information was s, forth In letter rom hat gsntl
which was In part adopted by the Court the basis Of H. in
here made sppsas in he recors beginning a. age
The Court declined receive testimony upon points
sAunton although evidence rendered BY him to overthrow
every imputAon brought 10 the knowledge Of Il
be perceived inecns the record that several q these az
legged impopee refer TO period when Colonel Hartman
the service Of the Confederate States and not hre
fore, questions within the Jurisdiction Of the Conrt.
In the 4 specification Of contained IN Mr. suas let
the Court Is asserted Colonel Harman soday pAsurage
corn the Government and employed Government
hauling wood hay contrary the s3l Regua
by Captain PeytOn QlaremAer at SAunton at lower rates
Than could be had also proven that few loads
hauled by the Government the
cHPsin Pyon, t. relieve the Immediate wAnts OF the Govern
ment and without the knowledge OF Colonel arman
These not In the Judgment OF COURT
on OF the Regulation above cited but whatever con
may prevail upon this point Court
Acon vas without fraud Government
unworthy OF further consideration.
The Court unable 70 the least evidence In support
any charge than the disposed Ahough
~ person meniened by Mr. Stuart likely possess niorma
examined except when the person diSclame
wledge after appearing before the Court 10 obedience s
show that dlIgsnt enors we're
obtain Information from other than sug
ge ed by Mr. STUART and bet Just 70 state that frch
that the defence could render " help forward the
promptly and oheerfully accorded. '
opinion the Court Colonel armnp has discharged the
Tespoube duties Involved upol bin With seifdsy intel
ngenoe rarely observed mis- Official due, IN those depart
ue the vice respecting which has been the duty Of the
Court Investigate nishs example worthy limitation,
alike eredSble to himself aud sdyania TO the Govern
1T The above named Court Enquiry tie case Of coload
HArmho sd Regiment Virginia v0laDtssr'ls hereby as
solved .... ...-
By order
(sgaed) -... s. Cc0PER,
ja2S-lt Adjrtsnt and Inspector General
ApJUTAET AND INsP dENLs cfrTcE
SPECIAL 9EoERsl
Applications for t.sd eopons 70 Gil whether
Occurring Ia Divisions, RhgSds Regiments BA,talon aus.
all besides being sent through the proper channels be
ecmpAud BY statement showing how ssch vacancies have
cured and until the previous incumbent shAhGye been properly
disposed and bis a1serce accounted fnr 70 the sGaeon Of
this Department, other sppo ntment Will be made
II. No transfer OF bonded officers from the positions which
hsy hare bel originally SsSLsd shall be recognized anti rai
ned by tbs Department
(,gned) s. COOPER,
isas-iw Ad!u.an. and in,pss.Or Genera.