Columbia Democrat and Bloomsburg general advertiser. [volume] (Bloomsburg, Pa.) 1850-1866, 1863-02-14

The following extracts from the com
mumcation oil h. II. Little Esqr, dated
Nov. 9th 1860, shows how the controversy
between him aud Paemoa John ended
"Paicmon JOHN gives up, thereby virtu
"aIly acknowledging himself faisilyer.
This fact is now placed upon record for
"iuture use AMI renders his paper lmpo.
'tcnt for fur her evil. =
II ,houid be a,bam d TO kick u tdeod
"lion, mucn more Pacmon John, since
"hG Is afraid 10 attract further notice, ey.
Ell by SO much as am eleyatjng his
" nrS,' &c &c.
Probably, the circumstance that the
District Attorney compelled the Doctor to
answer under oath, whether he believes
there is God who viii punish lieine,
before he could be allowed to testify in the
riot case, has stimulated the Doctor TO re
newed ialschoods. We will merely point
out his lies.
In his twatlle against the District At
torney contained in his last issue, the Doc.
tor says: 1.-The 65th section OF said act is
iu UleSe tcOrriS: "In all cases where two or
more persons have committed an ndct. :.
bic offence, the names OF al concerned III,
prosecution shall be commenced sha |
b. contained in one bill of inIictAont.
When you say the Sectipu is S~ fhpSc
"Or0S, why not give the whole section
Doctor? The remainder of the section 8
IN these words, "tor which no Al0re casts
Sb Il be eHluea H@, ytre nume NJ orr
person My 2rnS ca"tti"ed ihcrc,"
The section is under III tto "Cost3
and was taken IRON, and u ;ha yo,y
wod OF rhe act o. , ih OF March, = + :;
the preamble Of which Is Ia lherc worGs
"An Acc explanatory Of the act, entitled,
"An act 10 regulate the payment ol costs
on iudicm,uts'
lAo humber 2 The d. further SAYS.
But the ID sttict Attorney divided tAt
party into three parts, and sent up three
indictments" Now The District tlorney
did not divide them, but on the contrary.
they were three "sCparate' prosecutions,
commenced at "thrce different times. -
The Que against Daniel Bock,ey aud oth
ers, was commenced before a Justice in
August, 'G2, roturnabe to September Sc,
! sions, The one against Charles Fowler,
aud others, was commenced before jus
tice in November return able to December
sessions. And the one against James
Ralston, and others, was comm. need at
| February sessions, 1868, the same dcfel-
dants having been discharged from their
"recogniscme,' at The preyiou. court
And we are credbly informed that sull
ansthcr prosecution will be commenced
remruable to next court, against parties
who were rot known unit the facts lyaked
out during the trial of a portion OF the RI.
oters, Probably the 'catnep" Doctor
thinks that they, whether known or not, ,
should be contained in one iudictmont,-
But the act Of assembly, a portion OF
which the Doctor quotes, says, "if pros
ccution shall be commenced - against them.
In other words, against such of them, as
prosecution shall be commenced.
But as we are informed that the Dis
trict Attorney contempates prosecuting
The Doctor for libel, so soon as Andy Cur
tin gets out Of Office, we will make no fur
thcr comments at present
I3"A further lis; of Doctor Johns lies
contained in his report Of "the Great Ri6t
Caic, next week.