New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1863-01-19
tie. !, q ss,s 3, 1YIs1 r7-ETN

~. ,ss 10 sfosoc.A satlsns e,fss 10 Is d.
ssseuf' could BE- proved tn justification o. 10 ntsssu
ts d. scs,os cut Of ne so..sr sea :sv ,sis ~ =.
sss -. s *. at. -,
before the number u chlren psyt.s in ~
ps Of the house were piuti wss eos tie ssrt :
had night h.s .od wsrs dsfod dYva ss They sss
3D. ba, The cbDd Of tcsodsh, ossrsd % the aAh a q
will Der found tbs child IN dsrg rous posioa hsns
Ing aud swrrrs On some bsrner. sna 0Id1rd her g
doing this the p,.nsif her hand the ssGts Cheek
IL spuss,.S thu. tn. mother had a,hsd the pa an. .o,
time before her child wheasv-s plaintiff Ter d
Tas rsns thsr.ors when she s.s ,ss sh,1
danger Nd her band ssa' aRGs %, I'D Ls
mothrr told her that pisins had struck The plsiuaS
..,sa ss s 'S on. sD S ~. . Aa
court and thai charge wss t~ and wness 1
Informed srs Cn.ps,n thai ws' ts.s,; bat the Csud
allow the testimony to Do given Ths d-fsndssS
offered to prove what eo"vers 1 took sca bs,wess
hm-s ."d hs wife 90 taesr way up stare 10 the eryse
OF ssencs Of sta,H =
no counsel fr plaintiff resisted .ueh svdsse. being s...
and that whatever the misat have
bssn Wa 40. Ivy p.n Of the slesrd prov, csS NJ
part OF che plaintiff ~. tho Judss rasd !hs, w. pat =
defendant shea swoss that he ha ist come from the b1
lad roen wtsr. b. moi a., vie ard Proceeded sp sts
chi hd pointed oct psinh =. the sI who .sgp.d be-.
dared ' ,eu ' i n; cIs That pi.ios s.d l.Ds
Brcsvs ale put out her tongue TO and hsd also said
complain Of you aud have you cut OF the house.
Tn vid.Ioe three four wtss.ses Shove that the p<
d had said nothing whsey q thn andi 90, 'L ssess
Aesfug u tie pisinh. were sowed TO 80 tue %"
pndcs tho exception Of pain a. couH.e u niisas!oa
imazes TITO defsadsIyS tes Dony to be assuls set
70 ttis effect aApp.d her n tas ACE snd ~
slapped her asnn ALo that before ne si.gp~d ne, III
II p.ssoe. to her 90. that he thrcss.ed to the.
the urle ant
the Eoss bat admitted tia. last November he sntsea ~
.ainsou he st.ei th hinseIf AID nif family we've ren
Mem phi. 1ens..se tu.t he "ss cotton eto.sf s.a -
x.st N To- 'spgss s,,.'. s.sTssn ,CS ~. pi. ss
struck lie chd days before he made Me ssssu ea
ns- b., no, .oosas 10 GnI u- pain aud he'd INDEED ss
gje al ssou. ,hs ns.ser Tue p'inf Prossdthls 90 .ye
lad OK and 40 every hall wsrs po'.sd piac.
sa.s ppan Of any inc'iny OF the .mboyse. %
c"s,.pa.".s, Of I've .ui, lDec 2 be mad mace
point Ussed.pts counsel IA opsDns ~, .sss ..a $50
toe dssldans vey deeply regretted what 20 tsi done
Sa no Of kind offered and Toe descendant tests
nsd thai be had made 30 apslosy to TIE painiit
so are the st,r!al matters connected VITO tne
tina WHICH lasted from ~ until neaTy o. NJ A sTea
.Gor, BY the defendant and ais corn's to sNs
pon,ica. spcct the cse sd ~ show tia. thoe Sho IS N
o., Z. win psint.i AboiisoGsts posuiag TOE
de ena.at because he vi" seees.oniS TO- ellh-a thu
h. .intar. ltid.ut 8. held .o pail VIZ: Tue dspesea
iurlLsr saisb thai t 10 notorious ia zoe rubA,eSss no
TO az. oy.l peop, OF the United 9. a-s .nd hat .a1
ce IA. bs.a usned ssy .tsu.tye snd i'ait,Sg lig
al VI sid pcOpIs In III. bearing Of tins saesss Of sse
u.nl cuuse vent witness te wa. not
a. Aoo!,.olisi to which witness ssd. lie wa, thai
we AIT b.in, oysl to his Country"
s,,rr respectable yrosemsp. who board q. the boz
toll and ~ee present AZ tho trA, were Ldlcse - tne
Jufy a. Absuisa The plsiaf's counsel .vowed De 10
as case reward I'D oee suss
u,Isxs occurred Lee to root o. n1 own restisDoes
a. css nsvss bseD summed By the respsciive CSos
. be ca.ged jury th,t the e2sv IVES nos ors
40. vIndicc dsmszes was one for nou.si os'scs
jury 4er ssen absence lou Vrtaic' 'ot the ~Ain
NJ f,f- uiglA
FOR ylsi IA Sir }. D. BsiesGef ter Defendants Aesssa
LGss AID oHdyal-