New-York daily tribune., 1863-10-26
SUPERIOR COURr-Ocr. 2a.-Beforo Js,,lcs WHrrs AZ
JugT.
p.y,cr, AGAINST An IxPIEss COMPANY.


John iisdins sgt Dsniorh n Barney President Of Wells
Fargs& Co.
This wos an action 20 recover $500 and interest
thereon the Of drf bought by tho sn'f o. Gus
Fer,o Co Il sn trauci.co. the lS,n March 1870 psy
abb. at Boston which eTa a. Ios bJ tbe tu nuI tns
not s Panama In April Of ha year lAs pen,n on ~. TO
de1,ude IN. amogn. of sla the Office oi Wolls
Fnfso Co. ia Bo,ou aud offered indemnity hea against
N" o df1it bu, the sscut Boston refused % pay The
,noant sirs tai 10 advice. q dra- m California con
aln. no. ,il~rent reference to any sch cfn appn
.ton was thrs n,ade the ocs II toe Company at Ne~
yo,k nth tic ,an.e result, An econ ihan commenced
ss.u.. s Company in t ely. which Aas been nov '''si
a, io Jury dl,aseeieevon bcin IL favor OF
tie fali aud for iho d,sndsn on ne .' 'hi II
10 ,.. obt nd verdict tAo ful amount caied Niih
n,.r.. If the dsfnism. succecltd 0bi iu n nc" .
N .8n- purely technical ground Ie csiibouy on re pt'
ia, i.ug on hi. altogether docuIH' n'.iJ
i.tns Of deposl taken under various CONT .on.
c4lrd Csliofri. sfd else" lsi' We t-,'nt
which wcsc rad a. ihs pr.vioas s=l IN adi.H tLae
o,rsr s d.rssii.l4s oftw0 other ~tDrs" one OF whoh
Wa prcrrn in inc Office It san frsrr. a. ne il, Q. W
-arhas of the dTnit oy the plaintiff ane re oih,i
.,,s tho ls Ia the psintH pottrs.oh aver hae e.'n
baprlt by 70, rad ~ n r4'H % tn' pr t'-i
avps ron hs testimony n ths ci'c i, Al IL" 'n, I"
he f-d sais tac dls 20 c painii there were 'fht
crs. cn yrd IN tho oos Il s ban.ihs -nd e'eHs do
IN. ,e.,ioy Of ss,rn Of thc. bFerrh. orT-rd on
bla tha 9rfsndsui and tcy ora and a. 'hN. -
,ne trn appeared In III. bors' Of the dsieoen -ai ha.
o io node which ths ea-inss' ef ile eishd.4i "a
onduc,rI ach dr-a could have b. siel wiaon "
a9psalur the 6ooss On nc oiAef b.i tl" ~
IN. t.ur us. direct, positive s.d cir-rntiAn'ia ~"
.i4yd al,lcy and ~ fstaI s tho e'srufn'.uo.- cohee
- Ls ,urhase OF the df4A, aui nancl wrBesss "no
-. ,r..rf On a.. occasion Tho p-iauf wa .ay eci
a,..i.i hv tso witnesses who rrc,sns IN to ce4si
80 N s rh-u the pa.nh ysd lhs mor"y md soi ths
"a ,,d b, two Huc.s who tie dra ln s rostefsen
on board Lr om o<r rr-h SEQ - ians |" W.
4 q 80 horl in lsus4EA =, a. H.,
ur,rs O., trla books ss cher Tarfs i'r o prfpo., q
M NJ Ast n, sach dr4 IN ilc sod or noney - "'v.f
qry sso ,ed pl1l. graphic views Of het ohe' 81 ssn
disco o,asn,s ia tho purpose " 'h'"i. '"
tfr urnii y 4..crSse either tc J.iss of
ts i,r.ty be claimed hsvo borsEi tEe diin Or
the other snd plaintiff vi he pSsition % witness
sho te.ild tAi Lr I'D cesa At The of W. F.Tso
90 In sal graisto ArT the lls OF The eat ad In.
nod NOV .xrined thc books aid informed hiis that The
tooi. ds had bought on me ssv eel
ned asa nds had b,a cent on 70 Nav "a 70 nesf II
N. tr-ra, u.-l ccrnslcsd On NccDotdss pt 81, ana
brought conclusion ili, a'einoor ihe Jnry ~e.
.,...d At rres' length by william Fullerton e~q on behalf
of the defendants eud by l. T. Williams Tor the pa NJ NJ
r-pl, aner impartial cl1Tfc n tnr presiding
Juds. who i~ the th. Jury iss erdsnce ne
jazz asr shs.nce Of Ie ovr Aaf sn Lour re,1rnsf
verdict IN The pl.nH sth ntefe. sm5uniAs 10 r3"s% y
Co8n.o fos plaintiff l. i. Williams -sq Tor aseEds-si''
W Fullerton ess.. and b. y Dunriny esq
SPECIAL TsaM-OVr. 21bsf0sr Sa.si Justice bos0oHrfk
Alfred G. Smith IT,, agt Robert Il. Eooso'e.t-
Ori.f s-tied 80 80,
ssrsf.t ofser. sraa,cd Lewis Y. AiLs.olh, dc sst
Lalayeus D iL.r.i,on, kc.Oldsr alns ItsIes A
Mann. Receiver.
before Ju,,ic. NOVEL
J.cob Carpenter sst Niizn J teA s.i oihers -Nos.cn
Zen ei ~,hoa, eo.s paas kAyrg I-svc 20 rrrs hs
motion ths sy.es decided see opsaoH VITA 1-.S
a. spcc..- Tenn