New-York daily tribune., 1863-09-25

~ ms go GO, irert,n~ the de.cndan, to produce the
BODY the child OF tie petitioner, And tue iespo"ao''
nr wa se tit he l,,le si had boon taken from the
ady wish h,d pAcei oy me rc'iondsht & s
ereolc tho body could no, Dc produe'd Ite rcun W.
and evidence ordered 70 oe isssn and oUf o'J'o w
cuu 80 .n tho examination OF wltgesses. -
ine testimony su5aed ~ tae Court anu loci"on !"
Jadc Dean sni Oliver Dyer appeared for the pe'n's
-ra 1. D. Sherwood io' TIE Ts.p'naent.
SUPREME Co'rPT-GTsrp,L Tzsx-sEPr 0.-Detors
JGsiices ~ HXRf,SD lsGRAhAn ana l-SosAsn
JURISDICTION ~ TIE sUEfoGATA--cohfoosDiSa
ORA FELOSY.
TocasT sgt. Moran.
TIE matter in coutTOversy arose before tne Sur.
ro,e ofLe County II ScwiofA the Lna accounting a
f,r all.it. .,t.ao. o. George II. Powell. dccsssed
Amelia d. Mor,sn o. ofthr of biz ofthe iecessed,
W.. a. tue tan, q h death. entitled % a.reu'iye baf:
OH et. O ihs eth day Of Dccemoe ~" sue enecutso
an m 70 M Lr lnioost i tine esiaie to tie spPeahts
5o f, lrcourns her si,re thu, assigned, wla foaAd 70
amount @ ile suin n FL! 81 =,
IN, sarso.ae A,l iAs the assignment wa void and d.
rer.rd Mfs. Aos-sn's share 70 be- pad 20 Der
IRON t.i portion Il he trciee tho MeIr' hecAr ~
e rrd uson vhirh the validity o. the s.siInmen. va:
ros . va. tt IL had be.u procured under AZ s:ree,cns
oonround lrouy committed by the ha'o.ns ., - m H ~,
.1n. The ae - felony the .moo<Siel"t, OF 'yrsJ ~
Nr aol.an Who Ia the emoey yI"e.i oil she 'ae'"'A
a. ..sdinr fas,. Of tho a, ,oliow,;
Trc ,pprl,a Of hgar OF fV.rs yess
i''.t ?, 80 - toned 70 ,ei ,ni s iyer ,lsir foer 70
,,rr. md 70 ,hs price. Abons tie date AS, m-n
YnsS e 81 & -. I'd b. I'm ss anad psy
rn,rf al.oi4f.ngto -y4t. 10 secure iln amonn- ana
,flrr a..i h. i, - -Lfout 'l qufst.on, On lie ss-s
mort l- ty s.pd iornraf % aErst so sn. wonli oon.
4, h.. .,r,d s t,n ~ afrlascr.l. competed. aaS
anlsr . provisions ;hs Mer.. hse]cs made p.yneHssH u
rns ,s.e r,s s..ruer, invalid Tor want Of -
s.s or bsh. q The appellant, tia, his noss
ea.e q l efrericly rrsc Ilr tsf .nasf. was sD'oah.
c tel immsanie tfsEs;r of s' ~ hcrsHns in,ef
ssn all dn'y cntel ad dlir-rd u r',.nted
les, fssu.ie o f iurc lnd 's sras,e 'hosa have reesf
ed n asr s't.,a Co 80 ls.te ih- iusfr4lusn'.
if,is s-f,s.. ia ~ lri.dclou declare the iniru-
T B, di n, Clearly sp3.sr ilsf any fsct esed syaast
Wesley 'lors,n proved would have amounted to isassy
s- a. no proof q --'erz'ernen ,ha, f. Of inisn
ioa cbczse, b. seoie,is the ias o. eo's'1oa H'n s
/ Tisrr vss ro p-,of u conccaineut
| Tho earprs doi'cii rirsi b. proved. ,
Tie O.; The crime could o. esiof.hed only -
i. dd appear ,hat tic he,. ecker mad tnowedge Of
'r lle.. consg'ls lo alleged crime ,Ecls 'ey sne" a.
Ihs statue resaiies iuowisse Of tie actual eoam'iOa
Ttec va no asrsea o., shown to compound ref.a
fsou prosecuting catrse any lad BEEN eouHied "
Ie laasuas, or tho statute eonpouni couce'l asy
zach erne. 20 abstain nom Any pFo.ecson ihef,.'f,
nlc.fs a cf.uua' prosecution.
L. er. were '"o modes q ~ 81. uoa Arn',ns sni 'csd
ing 70 pdoDone crils, and the oher e!A uode-tns
bHul f'lt fNF an.
eu % abstain on PROSECUTION related to me eTliSe -
They l lo goys nsT-eucn, 20 sb-;ain nom crirsA
pfosaon To snsussr proved y tie ~ ''rs wo-id be
cliIrly sat nod - rr.,n % an H.,s ~ ~ay o. c"s
remedy igi his remedy which they bad IN view.
ad,g Code o. Procedure, tie M-s:. iecs"r lad
els remedy ss4la Mo.-n wAi,a they could urs1e unes
hey hii rcc, Hsh. to compound or settle ,1eH eva
In sg,ains o. arrc,,lns' Mcrs-u the I,eeSer, must bs
deemed have spoken of their o~n nah, TO hive h.
sF-sisd n e.s 4eoh and nos 20 te sai VI ise people 70
Language orhe O. sta osod eonsss9" aaoald De sss-
Gsans afg,ndo tt Ito ree,,e II e rested solely o.
promise not 10 institute Grim nl pocss snsl VOID yet
slcgc clens eouGegaI.oHc saPposs ASIDE ou 'acs
I,rr usreeu'n, 20 continue Morgan in enPOymcat
also o. pay tis iai--y 20 ais ,'e ne cgs.s.al
aud sla cr' peculry cousefson uuir ai- stipulation
6. show by hr i-s ayn'i. 70 TIE vi. OF al amount f-1
The ss,isn'n,at va proposed By Mr.. Morgan. It We
made g. pa, ihc Debt oi he husband.
The sumo ,-rs decree should be reversed with cos's
N, rrporlrnt counsel urg,d that the admission that tss
s'sael pina ieio seld va, ua upon 'hc 'rs and
for De rrsr u.r1da arlus evidence 81 ia real iN ady
Ths Surrogate could order ,he Of hr 3og. are
OF the .s.'sl,aL le could not ha,eevrn bad L hot bysa
dsII cl-ary knonloso q tue ASSIGNMENT until pro-
ducrd IN evidence before n could BE- pronounce upon ns
validity ur BE- had ii.e4 tho question b inspecting te pepsi
Lhrr te slrrofa.e I'D ja-Alc,ion to determine an the
rishs Involved h tnc coutofcsy he had Jurisdiction n
he bad no gldcou he APPELLANT have standing in Sols
fos tley ac % neither 90 the ossses persons entitled 20
sh-re "a t.e etfibu'l, H. estate.
Ito snce shows tls, he tine Of the .mberz, nent
hogsia va Of ccscr bro.ter ths' he collected
the tl q In the coals, of n eupoyucix as such ocf
chat he wroag'uy sppfopaed 20 he that the
unent Wa sv.n upon psol- or as'eeHen' not 10 peih
It onl, violate, the statute BIZ, q subversve OF the
a. ulnaost principles ui morals and pioc policy.
The prouisr 10 continue Morgan his employment and
give Nr Morgan the control OF s salary coupled
the promise not q prosecute h, and % conceal tie obcs
isnen and ,hese promises en iese'heI orned the coz
tsiutcd h the Illegally " tic l..o promise, and Is tere
ieckrr Brother concluded by the dsc,stlon.
by thea at e tanslcon TO VIII. va. Morgan ha collected
and wrongly prropsa,ed ts 81 ". s. or mother woJs
had emb,isod H. 1hey os,opped fsoa denying The
Truth of what thoy inen rcd. The deosraOA. were
acted upon. lhc afgmDen "as given IN conscgaenes ~
then.
IL. material whether the declaration. were uls ase
| they were believed and ectcl epon.
~ the appclants permitted TO say that the declare
tiors nsS' by then w Ar time o the rnaos'on ~e'n as
the asssuneut void aui because scc no dplts
bat that thcy charged Mos.sn with the enbeIten aud
The Com, ,Sos tse osp, and reserved II. decision.
John n Lewis arA A. W. BEadiord Tor sPi""A""' D.
Fenhcd ioE respondent
Elizabeth Grant act. John IL. Grani-Rcport os
Referee eeahImed aud judgment Of dlvor'' granted
COURT or GENERAL .sEssloNs-ssrr 'i-Bssot'
! judge NCtvNS
| There were no eases tried this morning. Lena
Phyer pleaded gully 70 grand larceny, aAd vas 'e"' " tho
sassh nasnshsn pleaded guilty Of sslut IN dsnser
on. weapon Mar, Walsh, and was seut to the fenrusay
'i msaS en- Roger, (colorcd pleaded guilty of assault sud battery
another cO4oT.d man. 4l "hs hen % t teaicstay s'
one year.
COURT CALENDAR FOR rRfNtY.
SrPRINL toukr-Genc.el tGm.-->anle 10 ON
Wcdn. dos. "a
SurLEnE Couar - Circuit -- rir' I -- shors
caul,s.Nos. g6si 29J5 .-.5 llJi -. Jha S,o, -oA
Elo, io.j 60i, slg il9. a1 fl i0s, ,iO ii5V. 'iss
pan N.-AdJouEned ioy the tenn.
sz..asea,--suar~. .srsAy--ss.
Favoa Nor. Ascut pvsr,l) bsr'ai &c he sds " Tns
llNl.~.