White Cloud Kansas chief. [volume] (White Cloud, Kan.) 1857-1872, 1863-11-26
Notice..

-NVBhSEs
' Pi:.ss. p;.'1;s. csrS. f. T.s... q. United s'
WHEREAS, An information has s'sn
w fled in the District Court Of the United
States, for the District Of Kansas, BY Robert
Crozier, Esq Attorney of the United suis
for the said District Of Kansas. who 1rssss.iH
for the Urited States, alleging:
That on the 9th day Of Sepsenber. A. D.
1862, one Peter keslsr WAS the owner of
horses, 2 wagons. 100 bushels Of wheat, sauss
OF corn, ] barrel Of moiasses, Is head Of eaiis.
lot Of hogs, J bie-barreiled shOs-Esn, !
stack Of hay, and revolver. and hath not ss's
said dsse transferred or conveyed away n'
same.
That the said Peter Ke.ler, sfisr the lib
day " July, A. d. 1862, acted ss an snsas sf
the army Of the rebels in arms agains, 'hs &C.
vernnens of the United States.
That the said Peter KesIer, amer the lib
day Of July, A. D. 1862. And since the dais 81
the pretended ordinance of secession Of 10
State Of Missouri, took An oath OF allegiance
to, and to supPort the Constitution OF, The 90
called Confederate STATES Of America, and &C.
ceptcd an election as a member Of Con'sn.
ton Of said State Of Missouri, since the date s
the pretended ordinance Of secession Of saa
State.
That the said Peter Kes!er. being she owner
OF property in the State Of Kansas, the sans
being loyal State. after the Eth DAY Of Jay
A. ID. 1862. did assist and give aid and conh''
70 the existing rebellion against the Goran'
ment Of the United States
That she said Peter Kesler was, on the $50
day Of July, A. D. 1862, engaged in armed 70,
beIlion against the Government Of the Unlisa
States, and in aiding and abetting such rsosi-
lion, and did not, within sixty days aftsr pn',
lie warning and proclamation, duly gives ino
made BY the President Of the United States
on the 25sh day Of July, A. D. 1862. cease :
aid, countenspce and abet such rebellion, sn2
return to his allegiance to the United states
whereby, and By force OF the Statute Of '1s
United States, the said personal properly
forfeited 70 the uses in said Statute spsoRSss
and praying that process In due form oIis
issue against the said personal propery,n
force the forfeiture thereof, and 70 noniy ~
persons concerned in interest 70 appess asD
show cause Why sach forfeiture shoa's' nss -
deeseed. ia- T3c.a Ia
. Asa WHsasAs, On the 6sh DAY eS Fssn-
bes, A. D. 1863, . warrant Of arrest issssa y.
the Office Of the Clerk Of ssid Court, andsf ~
seal thereof, directed 10 the MssshAi o "
United States 1or said Distisk ssnnsoal.s
hin 70 ssise, attach. and dstainr said peno,1
property, which warrant has been sxscussa y
The said Mauhal. ty ssidng sof attaching W.
personal pfopefty:a - Fsa>
PUBLIC NOTICK il tSsnfore hsreoJ DI.
en- Of the above Feeitsf facts, md that :ss ~.
day Of November, A. D 1853. is the nne
signed for the retsrn Of said warrant, .sen,.s
on the next day Of jMisdistion tAsreahe
1t the Coast poom e tie Dissies Court Oh "
United 6sasss, fss the District Of kans.' :.
Topeka, in said District, this cause WI
heard, when and where al concerned ID me-
eet are uotineA 10 appssr and show csnss '''
sach forfeitvss shouid NOT b. decreed:
.71ff e6i a JAMES Z. MeDOW ELs~
is. Narsbal for the District Of Aanl
Novenber II 1853 IN. hs zee, -