Dayton daily empire. [volume] (Dayton [Ohio]) 1850-1865, 1863-05-05

in that time-honored party the
principles whiehsS7sne can save his suf-
fering country from impending anarchy
and ruin, and restore the blessingso Of civil
and religious liberty to q grspt people.
We expect to hesE again from ehiaiasrlsss
defender of Constitutional Law, and may
he continue his efforts, and cease not his
lsbors until the American ensign shall
again wave over united and prosperous
people, and American citizens shall once
more enjoy the rights Of true republican
liberty3 a. y y 14.AA4 &4i
10 EEA clergyman at Milford, Massa-
chusetts, called the Rev. E.iSa Best. has
Published sermon in one of Che Boston
papers, in which occurs the following par
agraph:
"This blending OF the two races--Csuca-
sian and AfrieAn-7by smalgamation, is just
what Is needed for their perfection, y glt y
You will then see the highest, Doblest and
most God-like species Of humanity. o. Such q
race will reach its loftiest destiny, and this
nation become the glory Of all lands the
place which above all others, shall most re-
semble heaven, and be nearest to Il"
The Rev. Mr.. Best isa progressive.
He is little in sdyace Of the Abolition
party generally. but as he accepts without
hinching, the natural and logical results
Of their philosophy, the probability is
that they will, in the end, overtake him.
The Duty Of the Democracy. s.
We extract the following from very
able article in the last number of the
Somerset, (O.) Union a4.
Now what is the difference between party
which endorses the violation Of the Constitu;
ton and class Of men outside that party
who act in concert With them in such violation4
On the ground OF principle, their is no dis
tinction whatever Hfa AttE4
"Bnt. argue these men, 'the proclamation
of freedom is an GpPenddge 20 the main
question, which cannot be helped and Il
would not do to stop the war just because OF
'na' re say eouu no ~" ~
ana can pe nslpea yee " tas ss.{ Lo en L.u'' ~
say can no' Ie "1,peu - 'oa "@. na'e oes. ~.
preven'e9 uy 'pe .aSe ~ onee's - ~. ~
army hsu tney ou' rS'Seu 'leii VOICES NJ a'nS'
-. ,.r ,.. A.,
Does any Denosra. pehete ehs' ne. az, az,
In'h's.rauon wDuiu nese 'he war sSDppSe e,a
even II 'he o,u ou'V" Tou'I ~ t 49,
res.oreu % %u' ~ any
crh' oeHeSe Tue nos's " siI sPeoa'aso' O'I'
wouiu na'e '"e wa" rSs S.opPeu uAao' Wy VI
s'utrauons 70 nen Wy essSu'ABe .re
na ~ .'s ~ ~ :
Ponfy eneoulase ne ~ on 'nee
oatue. Le'u =; snouaus us n' .;,;.o ~ en- ~
anu .uo fOoo"5 VI our y. " ~ - .le
PoGHgss VI me,o spseunAsy.s. Hnu w
Ony ~ SdIT,;n ds ,.:."1- nSm os,s se Pso,
ponst,Iutionaf onsstions, III We. agree with
the Administration in it's niRpers war and, ON
constitutional enactments, we are Of that
kind And when men pronounce Il a war
for that purpose, on the part Of the Admins
tsation, and do not come out and oppose il,
| it is prfnaa fdcie evidence that they endorse
| it. They may say they endorse the war as a
war for the restoration Of the Union under
the Constitution, but that does not alter the
question a particle; they endorse it as il is,
and what they even say themselves it is, q
war for the freedom Of the negro. There is
no doubt but that there is a large majority ia
the army whose object is TO restore the Union,
under the Constitution. notwithstanding the
i'm pediment-the "appendaRe' - placed in
way ~ IIS ,Se !, oSsc,