Daily Democrat and news. [volume] (Davenport, Iowa) 1859-1864, 1862-04-17
Hx,gxprruRus OF SPECIAL vvup.

RxrMDlruRls OF SPECIAL yvup.
On account Kinselia's judg't
against the city,. ...... 9,H8,@
On account Clarl, dodge 4
Co.'S judg't against sisy.. 373l. l.sl-Ss, ,oos, IL
Road FUND HScuPrs.
Total amount from tax Of 1850,
20 and Sl....... ........ A,7l0,7s
HxPnDruRxs o. ROAD FUND.
street work.. 7,b63,N
Refunded poll tsxes........ 5,00-$7, ,S5S. "a
Total balance on hsnd....... $s,ll2,oa
All Of which 10 most respectfully submitted
WV. A. Rxurxerox, City Treasurer.
The Annual Report Of the City Attorney
Was presented, and on motion the report waa
received and filed. and ordered published.
10 Ms Honor the Mayor and City Council o,
the CITY of Eavenpors.
GxN1LxNsx-I herewith submit the follow
ing list Of suits pending during the past year.
In the District and Supreme Courts Of this
state, 10 which tho city Of Davenport was
either party or interested:
1850 Austin Corbin vs City of Davenport in
junction-still pending.
1908 James Grant VS. City, and Gas Company,
suit fur injunction, still pending.
1929 A Lc Claire vs City; $4,000 damsgea
claimed 70. not enforcing IN uket ordinan-
ees, decided in favor Of City by the Distric,
Court, and now pending by appeal in the
Supreme Court.
1881 VIM Mccullough vs. City, settled.
1889 3 Parker VS. City, judgment, settled.
$3.50 VIM Schmidt vs City, judgment, settled.
s0V8 City Of Davenport vs. Peoria Insurance
Company. claim Of s., 900, for insurance on
City Hospital, still pending.
6179 T. kinsella W City, for mandamus.
6l95 Clark, Dodge Co., vs. City, for mandamus.
These Two cases are nov pending BY change Of
venue in johnson county,
64s5 CLARK, Dodge l. Go, vs. City, suit for manda-
mus, still pending.
$500 Joseph Kirgerlee vs. City, claim for 81 900,
for .aking part of . los oa Perry street, still
pending.
62sl Adam Noel W City, in njunction to restrain
the Marshal from selling property for taxes,
still pending.
66lO Willard Barrows, ct al, W City, this suit il
for On injunction to restrain the city from
paying any of its bonded indebtedness or
the interest, still pending.
678l Thos & Campbell vs. U ) Mcneil, injun--
tion to restrain the Marshal from selling
property for taxes, still pending.
$500 q II Mccormick W o Mcneil, suit for in
junction to restrain tho Marshal from sell
ing property for taxes, still pending.
6s36 State bank vs. City, suits on notes given by
the city for interest on bonds. judgments
agains tho city. rendered at the ebraary
term 1862.
6S37 State Bank rs City, suits on notes given by
the city FOX interest on bonds, Judgments
against the city, rendered 1t the February
term 1862.
6s3S State Bank vs City, suits ON notes given by
tho city for interest on bonds, judgment IS
against tae city, rendered at tho February
term 1862.
$3.50 Merchants Bank, Of Boston, VS. City, suits
on notes given by the city for interest on
bonds, judgments against the city, rendered
at the February, term 1862.
s54O Merchants Bank, Of Boston, vs. City, suits
on notes given by the city for interest On
bonds, judgments against the city, rendered
at the February term, 1863.
6S49 City of Davenport vs. q Z Z Mitchell, sui.
on notes amounting to s2,4oo, given for
taxes, still pending.
$3.50 City Of Davenport vs Geo l. Davenport, suit
on notes amounting to s., 200, given for Ia K
es. still pending.
1851 = E Brown VS. City, injunction, still pond
ing.