, 1862-07-18
Changing Inspection Cards.

Considerable excitement waH manifest On
Change this morning among commission mar
chants in consequence Of the inspection card
eD q caz load Of wheat On the Illinois Central
Railroad track being changed from Rejected - to
mo. l." The following, which was resd before
the Board, gives history Of the affair:
oH1cAso, Juiy17, 1867
Meessrs. G. T. Davis. 3. P. Hutchinson, Gins.
HInckley, Inspection Committee cr Board Of
s1a: have, this 17th day Of July, 1852, ex-
amined Illinois Central car No. $50, and found II
to contain rejected spring wheat, the same being
poanas to the mts.u1ed bueheI The sboTe esr q
wheat vas consigned to Leonard 4 Jenn1son,
md he ticket Sn ta sas wss ehsngsd
leved BY me to be in the employ Of the abnre
Leonard & Jeunison. The changing Of said in
kpectlon can be proved, and the man who did 1t
identified.
Assistant Grain Inspector, I. G. 3. 3.
MI. Tudor r. Bean, supposed to be in the en-
p1ov Of Leonard & Jennfson, is the mAn thtt
Changed the inspection Of /. G. car No $50, this
q. H EAu1, mc.R.R.
IThe following letter waa sent to Nesns. Wells
& McGinn1s grain. shippers at Mendota, by eaid
Tudor T.. BealL But the parties to whom 1t WAS
sent, mailed It back to Chicago, and 1t found 1ts
way to the Directors Of the Board Of Trada:1
CHICAGO. June II, 1859
Messrs. Wells & McGinnis:
GENTS Having taken charge Of the Inspection
Department of Messrs- Leonard y Jennfeon's
fesin stns gaia oah nd tom AZ asaagements, %
fnose G1 soa tci4 fnd II much to your fate7est to
tAatsunizs them. It is needless to etate in what
WAY e7Reet t. to assist oonsignots' but the future
6iened; 'N0 TUDOR T. BEa11.
r. ST am with the inspector through every
eaea s ID dey ~ It the s. a q 4 aSe q 15I ID Tic
afternoon and four to six IN the morning; on the
Central nom seSen to twelve each day. T.B.
corT OF WAY H11.
Shipped BY Mooney, st sub1este. III, 1 ear, No.
$50. Wheat IN bulk Consigned to Leonard q Jen-
ntson, care Of s. 8. & Sons.
15ss is to certify 'has the sssys + = Inc ssR,.
After the above statements snd correspondence
we're read On Change, HI. Jennsson Of tbs azu,
Of Mes1s, Leonard d Jennison, sisted that the
acts of sud Beau, Is enumerated above, were
wholly unauthorized BY his firm, and that he Would
| Immediately discharge him. He said that. aftes
his attention was called to the 1etter to Wells &
McGannIs, ha ordered BeaA to write again to ths
parties, and he (Beap promised to do 80 and
make 1t t'a1 Right" p.
Since the above ,wsa written. the following afa
aagit WAS Ibid oa our tabs Tor Publication:
| '+* =UH1nAao, 1u1y II, 1861.
To the Inspection Committee Of the Baard O
| Trade: - 80: = =
In regard to the report 10 The iaspec
i tdou CfRfa1n read On sEhauge today, would s1y
Leonard 8 Jennison. II whose emploI hsye beea
hare not given Hae 6ny orders to WtiEa lestets t
parties holding out Inducements that they Qeon
i ard & Jeunisun} could mdnenca the inspection Q
: Rratp-snd the 1etters written to Acfiiunts ner
Rfttea WITHOUT ths! keoWledge OF consent OF ha1.
Ieuuard d Jennison. And Ts1she1mofe. sa1i
| tIEouard & Jenni1on have no knowledge Of An,
e1ra q grain cors1gned 70 thEn being ralsnzed i
Inspection And IS to cxt No. 68 It Wea TepuTte
10 ne b the Inspector 10 be rejected, hut hAd u
,tIcketon It. Ard I brought sample of said cs
$50 to the oidea ef Leonard & JennIsun. md state
to them ttere waa no ticket On It. Ro
4 tbs tn1pae.or said he thought It was Inusty, an
Il would 10 rejected, Whetenpon Iteeetved oIds1
,ttom IeanaSd q 3eunlaoa 70 hara he ear. = !
, shonld sbe parsed rejected, r1n into, tho beggtn
Mpp@ o6 heeszs. :fturges 4 Buckingham IN
ss&d Leonard 4 1e1uieea would hare Il pas int