The sun., 1862-01-27

supreme Court.
The Customs If rByOkcrs.-Sims"n Draper rs
Mara S'sbbins This was an a'tiu. recover OF
the defendant 1886 81, being the arnuD ~ loss
alleged 10 have been sustained ly the plaintiff on
sale of bonds buught ur the defendant, hiCh was
claimed she refused ~ receive,
IL appeared that In March last the defendantgaye
an order h. tho clerk II the = aintin g. purchase
bonds ut 42A, requesting that notice should lie
given her M soon a- anything was done
The purchlsc mtie the same day, a. shown
by plaintin, aud the defendant notified by mail.
She refused 10 accept, because the notice was not
sent by hand. IN consequence Of hor refusing 70
receve the bonds sold the next day, ut luss
Of 500, tur which amount, together with commits
| sions, this action is brought
The defence ret mp was the same excuse for
not receiving the bOnds-thnt the Notice WAS not
| sufficient. Tie Court held that the notice was slt-
| hcient, and gave judgment for the p'hntih ior
| S5i9 49,
Interesting TO Stock Dealers-The Connecticut
| Mutual LIE Insurance Co rs. The Cier,ldnd
| Columbus dHd Indiana n. II. Co.--This was an
| action to recover the principal AMI interest upon
| certain bonds, the payment of which was glaran-
| teel by the defendants.
| The plaintiffs claim that In August l-i,I, they
| bought twenty II, 200 bonds made 10y the G. Ilum-
| bus, Piqua and Indiana Railroad Company, and
| that the payment Of principal and interest was
| guaranteed hy the defendants. Tao deiendnutS set
| no that under the laws AZ Ohio they had no au'
thority to guarantee the bonds that the bonds are
AL void under tie Ohio laws, they were issll-
cd 20 one Dem snn, who was Director OF tho m
| Iany making them that their guarantees was Oh
iaiupd by fraud ent representations in respect to a
certain change Of the p,iage Of the Rold, a1d that
they part II series Of 400 ike bonds, the pay
ment Of the principal and interest II which Is en-
nined by an Injunction In Ohio; and that the hanis
have never been endorsed by the payers, and that
| plaintiffs bought with notice oi those defscts.
| The PLAINTIFFS claimed that the consideration flr
IN. guarantee 10y the defendants Of the 4O0 tpnds
via the ,hAnge q glage from the PennSlyar.a "A
glage ~ the Ohio glNge, and alleged that the sta
tu,ss Of Ohio authorised tie guarantee that the
transaction was In all respects q ust and eln'ahIt
| one. Denns1n was not 70 diregtor OF the Company
4 t.. ID ~
contract, and independent - the validity oi th'
touds The injunction In Ohio wis dissolve ed, ant
they bought at the market price upon the 'a'th %
the dire,tn tors, the stockholders Of the dofendanis
having ia their respective meetings approved oi IN
guarantee suei ulnn, and tho responsibillty Of m
Company. The Court ruled that the plaintl's ver
whatever might he the rule in Ohio as 10 the uues
ton raised In regard h the omission =, end rsa IN
Z t0nds and als1 upon the other ground set up. tn
answer u The defendants la suit In Ohio was rca
IN evidence, as1 considerable other evidence take
In tie case. The plaintiffs in this action only sue
upon certain coupons that were in arrears, but In
e question raised 10 the liability NJ the defer
daut- upon tho londs. Verdict tor plainths b
slIn gldned-fG,37s 90.
10 surroEate's Court,
, An0ther Missionary Fund. The will of Rev. ~
n sun II. Gunner tate Professor Of Biblical Lear
4 ing u the General ThenOga seminary, which w1
!, now admitted, leaves 500 IN the F,reigu Commit
4 tee ~ the Dlhestc and Furei u Missionary S1sie
y of the Protestant EPisc1pa. Church.
IS In the Court OF General Sessions m Friday, VI
~ tuh OF Dr. Charles Cohe for abortion ou W
% Mary Ann 'liaker, which WIS commenced the d'
J. rrel"u-' whs called, but owing 10 tho nun-ttte
dance oi witnesses, mo- evidence was taken, 0ui a
IL. Court adjourned till today.
Il Ar THE Court or GENERAL SEssIo'
It the Of DR.. Charles Cpbell, indicted Tor m.
,- slaughter in the second degree, in procuring
- abortion upon Mrs. Baker, thereby causing I
y death Of her infant, resumed and conclude
The Jury brought IN verdict of guilty OF mAd
y meAnor In the uso Of instruments upon tho psrs
0. Of a woman, with intent 10 produoo an abOrtio
of The prisoner was renanded To-. sentence, and /
1, court adjourned fcf the day,