New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-12-04

Goelst ast ROss ,
II 10 not error to take "A Gaze from the Jury, and
iirsnt verdict Tor the planiH where the Testimony 'uce
- ID. c.ar woad &c. .is ser's. TO- ,as dsIs"'aA'
a. DC" Clearly ''@"v 'hg '.ii'1ss Fer 'i'h'''
w ere evidence lad beep given on beth rides
erdfg 10 show I'D up~n hoh he iry world have e-on
smsl!f amount ,it sired dne-h-d tia, ~ ninc
~ tatss Igry st us1s' tn con.Tre .. ssiea ey ts
n, Tih' to ~his years sshy" WI" sssor' fsf A'So
SPECIAL Txx. Dec s-B.tore Ju.,lcs WHITE
DECISIONS.
jean Aide II,ror ast. Robert Reid, imple.aed.--
Plsian'. motion or Trial against defer isnt ow,
Zen 20 With c.,r Nj House fsr pi4.nlh Mf Fs's'f'
Tho sane az. Tie Sam, and En,H Crow irnpleads1-
Notion f'r tiis slaia,i q. vsiant- n.i sLG roy
tie JUICE cred ia rcuirt u,at qieslos - Ia; 10
toe jury Whittier not ts bof's ni W ga ,e1d were
nees,sJ 20 T.in.f Mr hoo's 10. riain,h MI C'ur'en
fof Gefcndsns iel .ni Grow.
Imit I@S,-D,e 3-Bsfors Jn'tce ho'voHrH
LifEL sUI1-iRORTANT TO NEWSPAPER fEOPRIE-
Tons--cHAaGT or BLAcgaAILING NOT LIIZL-
ous Pr sg--PAETY ADMITTED As wIrNEss TO
TRANSACTION WITH DECEASED AGENT OF oPPo-
SITE fAETY-EyIDEScE or STATEMENTS MADE
Br CITY EDITOR" Admitted 10 SHOW MALICE
os THE FART OF TIE PUDLIsakRs--PRIyILkdED
rrcIIcA1I?s,
Ldssi az. LrSoki Brooks. fr0pistsn CT The kre"hg
Tlis action wss tried Now "a, and was brousbt
sslns hs rropsou Of N. Erertre Erpsn for PUBLISHING
Of receiving oaey from oSes fr ns services isenan
bout fsImiss,on oil tie Loart O. stc'Fopo "a fohe-
Jh- af'os IN lac goJs,s was Lssdci b.srA1silng oy
Policeman" and that was portion eftho ppthca,on cam
planned T. The vi 4. publication read la evidence On
the AZ, u tn defendants, and circymseccs 81 the trial
proven. The Coar held inst Tho term Slsoimi "a, NJ"
o-lous Pc, and ba whatever shenss that term nil
po; the aG-r Of tie srce fully er3 aired tho isc
tie whole % together And also that "ndsr
the B. ndsni, evidence tas hesdns tA-n win tie 81 Plan
at0u fol- wing Il, coustai-a fsir report OF the aai and
wss. tsss fors. privileged publication,
FOR he purpose Of ,bg~ins actual malice hr plfri was
whes. 10 his behalf to conve scion
h., rr DAY, after ,hs publication wish the Cay Editor
ten had cha s. oftaaI .,pairsnt of The L,s', bg
IL .iate dsc 10 this dsfead<nS counsel objected
o. the ground: a.
Fii. Tn.t thn d-fspdsns not liable In primitive dam
tses esccut Tor ee shown BY their perssE, ses aud
tho OF thcir agent Cannot DO assi
eviJsf c. Of relic. On tLsir pat
SeccHe Tat tho sets or statements II the 'ent msde
the Of lts pu5c,tisn could DO 90 Gsed tho~e eaos '
al dass ,negysfd czbuo' ne evdcuce ~ such tcs.
Thrd, That tho psHrf as party 10 tho scion IL ex'
cn I'D no t..iytug IA bis - All w re.pec 10 snT
conauBes ion h.d p,'ors lJ BY hlm vita
d e.ssd psrssn representing the opp,ats puty.
TIE oyeTuei tLese otisco sad be pla'r III i-t
that several day. s the publication Ia oted sn Al
tcs the ci., esr. I'D rqu, ei lin g. rnbsh IT, which
h. eroned do but o1efvd 10 rnbsh the substance oil
plsiHth'. -Ersi n
TAe our held that this vas not su.nt svIenes Of a.
- 20 TO suTy yetot fegnGed upon vou De
sse sbi that 70 the quesob Of privilege WA matter
oil law. tt-r- hsi"s NJ conflict ofrgidence. .
Toe plaintiff ccnls ciued th.i TO coItuts cs'ense II
u-o~--lJ prove the uth u %. charges saf ced ne
o. fry ct .enrs bu: the Judge tsc.d TIA; II vas
1y pssy proys The Br iorts u the l staied 10
tne publication. motion Of de.shdanrs counsel dis
"a is,sI he complaint.
a. ssaord ior pIns Cyrus Law,0n aud H. v Hitch FOR
dC!,u1sGt..