New-York daily tribune., 1862-04-25
Law INTELLIGENCE.

SUPREME COURT-sPgcIAL TEE~.-APAiL A.-Bs'ofe
Justice BAFHIHp.
THE HSELEY sTREET -cLEAsING CONTROVERSY.
Levi. Dayi, SGT The Mrs. HoFe, J. liaeseJ aad Con-
tIoler ussG
Mr.. Edwin James proceeded with hn argument
10 favor of he application Tor Receiver snd Injunction
and In reply T. To, argument NJ M BnuiL Hs cseded "a
r-r upon the cited 10y the other side 10th In ths
poius fnishtd by theu snd a. sey trcurtely repord
M could no, The pfoprrty bo,yeyr of tskinE point
e did sud splitting II uto ten, sud hen suedvinE each
e then that rart Of the case resns 10 the two
deeds Of he 18th OF February snd he other h 10Th o. June
one ben, the snifrr from Sir Hatey 10 ts hes,r' Hope,
AVID tho Other the tT'n,ei hom the h"peito bsn Itte
ION Those leeds cersn usdr out cshe Tor receiver
nno, er 40 Junction SAD IN e",9 I'M, 'pp.ei%%a %
va trsnt-d tn,y cend not pce'd wi" tho wos ana ibe
f.c now that Bish Yeysrtan sons eould proceed
Tho Hopes bad 10 Ight TO ths oi hey hsd -
"bnsnci-l control" winch evident they relsine
oply Vr the ParrO'e OF securing 10 smssyrs tho
about which they were 90 seu Ana az 10 e o'ctoe I"
Rscsver tho fact THAI the Hopes sniy re-
csirsrs End receiving so year for aaon service A 70
the Esuon that Dsgss did not contbae 10 Ar rfos
va svidsut be Sss nd expected 90 eontibuie lof e
Hcpes constituted bemsoves sncd di ector end by
lhs deed Bsh fsveoD ihe{ alone "sso Ag'A"ILea %
re~.vs money from Uo Coutoles liz 81 snch contracts
ere nothing Ae tie control Of the nns,. d"Pftmsn
an. very deed 4 tuslse-hp OF Feb 25 made e Hopes
euptsbe 70 e OF the fourth shsir which thry ,sid
,, 10 Wood but which really IN nsyii sud Jrt nehsf
D NOT Wood old they maze party 10 tht coutrtc But
the 2sh Of February spd toe ijth Of Juns yry
u,f qus1n had sraen In the share Of az indic' mont and
t. psnciturs OF StOoOS Gas To he Inquired nio ht"t
a a. o. In sueh connection seen persciiy fabulous sui
MIR BuuI renswed HE objrctioa soy susion n tbs
100 The Court had ruled u out snd ts no opportunity
VS.. ,,.n them to reply Il eOsihy Improper Tor c0nn'
.s 20 sIggs upon u
M lanes said he wo1l make Tsrsona .usions 10 con.
n,cou h that 1900 snd would tsusiy The objections Of
-oyns, by cslug tho 5000 NV crinnsl poee5dngs
had been ln,uted and new tLoas Of The es'd orosmo
necessary The Hopes bec.no unes'y and hsnos he decd
10 b,ish Yeveton. wherein these gentlemen es'umed %
utv dis slOOo fToU the Qoh cpd one would ihivt ihsi u
seb proGss TO be expected from swsspins the fe,s
ist ths cutters you'd actually eIudo sod In tbe dsea u
Fb y they ynz.1 Davies shsro by toe oi Wood
bnt h the decd OF JAMS IS they undsrO,k 10 guore IT, But
ts Sat ioccs sodon sItccLt FOR tei Thus. the
Hope. by the deed ~ Juno H tuAt scAoy out Of the cas,
alt6ss her ruorei Ds, yod I'D o. any pre- snl criminal
fs,er Sbiy and secured their SO 0o aud made em,e,es
te, fsociyerf ios witch thoy % receive 800
yst II that saouni could be paid for . quasi receive r
shp snt s10uIn ooud be made f0nbur ths 20 o ths
arsv " that p7ons likely 70 mus. fail 10
tho ground BIT Jsmsa thea ss sd s legsl rropos-
uon tis s'r solvgicy bar 20 njun on snd re-
eevsT ingiEz that fhe westh OF could not shs,or
Lila nom tie f'spohsioiy @ poor who
ighs 30 llluowuti With hai no concluded By stating
d, uould hand tie csust HE Toinig morrow.
M Bufil sat no would Ike fopy 70 such r1islnents
hs counsel - were o based upcn pagers IN the case
fof there he'd been tr many ma anens not ouy ot mo
cou,flu o. pa9o4s but u Hulist ou.iide vi hom.
Caur e. hsd r ui!y -aio bio cofirr ,Ie N what hia
ope lrcolL ah Old bsgo bsrn % n;h ho tbur) "a,
ie,-,a e 'firf al he pol,' une'a ~ psina.ion
90 ir f.rrrf
I'D. ----.. go. "a. -. - .e-- ----s n ~ ~