New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-06-14
Law INTELLIGENCE
SUPREME cOURT-cmcrIr- l3-Befen Jade.
MARVIN
INronTANT c0NNERcI.L cAsE.

SUPREME coURT-ciRcrir-JrS i3-Befes js'd''
MARVIN.
IMPORTANT COMMERCIAL CASE.
Edward Cunningham sst z. d Buckingham and Jas Leigh
1his Was an action 10 recover the value OF Tx
bale OF raw . claimed 70 have been retained swiuly By
= 100 aud wss sold by Cary co, % omission merchants
] dn'a of ali he l.t. 81 iosth IN Ii, colpl.iEl
IL spresred on tie trial that IN Move n1cr sS, james Les
boush the ala aud gave his note ~ 'H month, II -. men.
h. tie latter pat OF the sane yea Lish ,Asd h Isns
eymour Conn where both the de.endr,s res'e ara
where the factory and stock wee On oeha o.
Buckingham, IL was tesiihed that tie sis never es
but tLeIe cobnctn- evidence upoh I@. ~
both deendnt. tesiyins Ia shdav % ne contrary ses
a. affidavit vele Apailed b 60. l5oe.. ne p.I-
claimed tie delcl dauts coinng together De-
fraud the creditors OF defendant H. n. -
In 1882 btcAnRAam nt MOI -' i:tsn --e , ~ 49,
secure himself took norgsges Lo-hs real estate sa'
eTy household property aud pledges Of peisoIe p
rfiy. The law n Connecticut i such that ali securities ~
void II any OTHER cedos ssuc' an attachment G,n" We
debtor within o. daJs ioin Oh, tine the security Is 1Aea -
this case Il alleged that buckingham Obliged 10 Ir
several creditors Of James Leigh, who had asenns.
issued against tbe property o. Leigh w,A9 % days ana
tas way the siyaLcesDy Bucengt 10 Leigh we're increases
eftct Tor plaintiff assins; Leigh. AID Tor defendant bu
p Jul,. Dean for plaintiff. IL C. 9 Andrew, ssd II B.
Munsou Of Conuecticut FOR dei-ntsnts
LIABILITY OF RELIGIOUS COMMUNICATIONS
OF TRUSTEES FRoN OFFICE.
The People rel Lewis Valentine sgt The Trnsiee' o.
African Methodist Episcopal Church, aud three other '
these were maudamus proceedings institutetc
1859 by Lewis Valentine Robert Mcclan Clare, . n'g
and VIM r Randall to OBTAIN t,ll restoration 10 one
trustees Of tue A Church corner o. Leo ara aIu
steet IL this city. which office tAsy had been ouy eee.
aud from which they subsequently e1e'ses .! Wv
/ Board OF Trustees. -, -, ,,,,
The Issues involved tried an The 3h irs' ara VIZ
nearing that tue plalus elected % the oHice aS
,rr Bo.rl OF Trustees hsd excluded them tnerrro
,fnx that they had longer any rgh 70 h9d 'iee en-
I'd bS e.tng tler persons tac sans ana tnss she CT
Of oil for mich Plaintiffs elected had never etlDi
d. Count decided the piaGtias were iAtsay r41u.
ION otfce which they had the ght 10 hold al ne 'enA
ir-d and deaied the landaAus app lol Juisofs'
40 d.reS iu aror OF the psinr- ior FOO or the co
-xpense, y; thc proceedings ma the respohSenS WIN
owed tlity dass ln which 90 pay tue sane =, ,-.,
Nsn Worst Besrds.ee for the Te.atoi'i WE H. "'''
forgespoudents 1T. = ,s..o
Action 70 RECOVER POSSESSION OF atSsi'
pr. l. P.,-ce agt Kelly Sheriff, and Il. T. Midget =
d Plaintiff sued 10 recover possession oi the sal
White cloud lyed upon b. ihe sheiir IN s,o usdeF ~
" IN AN fevor OF Mad ,ett against Antonio r e.ie4
tif claimed fhA, the blik belonged 20 jose S.Ts
On, nom M. derived e Defendant claimed 20, 49,
49, "a g,r eahsd made an srrag cement by whicA t,l
- 40 slva, &c the tunds Necessary TO purchase 'e
,,,lI,.. bat p,lrtier 10 be the owner q I -.
I p.rur,. re.lning his ownership % the 'uPples -
as iutsu'r the vessel should 20 into nc sANc
Dircutir. arose between them and IeAe.,i 80. "A
az sze of tho vessel IN bAus hAei in NC ~ 80 r,,ea
,ok nom Jones bin OF sale 20 n'f-e, ~ ~ S,.s n.
- b,n.. IN, orite, bad had sus i'ioIs 81 nv
80 I'm I've traders Ater the on 81 sac war 49, 49,
lor,. ,.y. bin Of sale wlluou' any e'Dsl'
49, uuIsJ-. who shortly thereafter iof noh r H.,
t,, ~ - gny, bill OF sale TO the P.Alntin' t'sl
,sl.,.SJ 's.n1a, ior plaintiff, A. }. NandeIfoe' ="
] PENDANTS.