Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1862-03-21
Che Ohio 6tatesnrarr
rKR N a
sapreme oourt or ONTO .

- IL Z
II
Supreme Court OF Ohio
r
Hon, Milton gutlIR nb,s, J,.,,o., n, ,uu, -
Peck, Hon William T. 1ho,son Hon Ja.nh nSahn ps
hof, and Hon Josiah scott Jndges '1fvg lta.s
Reporter, ~ 'oi"0nnsiu'
ToRsn.v M.xo, 10 ,aao
-Ha- N0A''A' 'aron 10, iooS'
r. GENERAL DOCKET.
No. 80. The L,pcaater Ohio. Morn,so,r,,. = a..
sirsalS eouDtv Hffof 70 the District Court Of
snoTT. IL Hs,a.
| l. In \ anti unar = oos,...,
NAV At the same tina ooDsI. s sAte Oh iaets
and be PROPER rronnS ~ conn,e 20 tns scnon
tstsman, ~ S, IN ~ .nis uoupie aspect, upon single
dsSense from fhe conr,a NI roInny separating the
merely formal and obecon ,bs,a,o uces. S y 10 one
% myHUl Tfnn5 ,bs ,,,., =, .,
to treat sncb nieaSin az S.v ~ 'ne UouIL error
anding mon ths ,a ,, Touh.er ciaim only wlIhout
defense. "s 'rO" :" A'A s'0unu VI
7es whIcS aIiov" "a Ss,aaS AeL O. anu sat.
amount due Mn so, aha y ny On part OF the
amount 90 due exceeds the Ip,isdctsn ~ The I
without remttinr ths excess and rvh;nh oio @ Dh,
Guent anton ~ ha ~ I "n.v suDse
40 w,thbsld rsss' i y, or r e ItooysIy o.
are the proper subject Of Se Of sns soss
the aubdIvinIon az oIatns ~, nn,iwi5.ss
araing from sngIa iransao,,o uIsuSs1u E a oamAses
iba nroney snhisc, ~ ' anu wnien may De
When IN suit befors Juscs ~ ,bs mop psa ., sesS
af ala
ated damages to IN avian, o.as ~ suun uhIquu
he JustIoe and stsmnts 10 .,SSs 'as jurisdiction Oh
pressy whholdnS he srcess S y",s INC sao W s
TuSce aeouyaS thsyshv M ~ tu.uts IecoveryI .ns
mer,ts q, srch oii ,h ~ 20 pass upon tne
~ IT. &c. - ~ ssei IN Wnoie OF IN part sucn
he Justice viii not nSsci ~ a NV Posssgseu py
twsen The Same naytiss - su"'equeh' aou0n Oe'
Judement Of 'the ni,,,,.t ror,, 49,, o.. -, a.
mon Pleas reyersed and csnss rerosnTsd ~ ~ H' ~ :,
Common Pleas. " INV NOu''' VI
vr- 0aa
10 the District Court OF Ers ao,,nt~ N'iOi
arT,,e, n -" .., - Nvuny;
uosbie note obainsa SsOr. Oy ao naGrser upon ns
the defeudanls sci nm the;S srsws, s ssssnsa ,hst
the note was heId nv the nena" tos ia
and that ho wronRfuliy transferred Il IN fraud Of he
9, sne ~ M and that the plaintiff had full
Held: T,'''' "H'" '' 's0si'su 'ue H''e
Ist That unor the 5a,,n5.,. ,. a.
confederation And frspsnist R,0S"k W .ns "Sn' ~
tween themIelyes and the n - " sU nose % 20
ths nainti 10 sbo ths ee u was upon
consdsr.ion '" '"' He lecel'eo Inc hote tof Vsho
"a MY A. ,,. ..H
va,rs a.. ~. S 2 pialn.n naVng proved tnat ne paid
"a red 10 hin h.s, anu received H. indorsed ana Trans
tIade II was not ,onsn sne IN ,ne usual COURSE o.
receiyed ths s.me ~ uPon Nun 70 prove mat no
fendants az sosint ~ soiance Oh Tue rshS Oh 'ne ue
"a ma, 90 ssslnss ~ VIC payee'
the nots bssole AZ a. ~, y .ne pAnIn oi 70 IeceWng
yalas the nrooS 40 sds Az M M o. pusnes toI
nvsrcona 70 ,h ~ 9e ~ tne oeenoanS was therepy
cover rss,orsd nd PpSa. IN ssumptYe ngnt 70 he
"a 10 ths dsssndsat =. wy DuIuen oi PiooL tnen hnt
tha nlaintif ~ snch 49, nom.Leoss, On tne Pais VI
~ ktrs, ks-, y ,uen want OF coneioerauon ana fraud
M. iaa Who,. ~ tns I,s.nct ps. CGan reversed.
and Marine i.ns.o H oL ouus'1 " Ihe Loieao 5le
trict 0onrt ~ Inoa in eIroi ~ INC Ois'
PRcK. j. Held.
/ That an in.nr.r.. ,o,.. - . 1,
its charter ,.to ioar t t5 2 wnsn ~ ~
or public cornorStions ~, rs.i ~ ~,
Is prohibited from usnS tbs sans ~. ha ,seSs ~
ness OF exebanSs or J e os.. ne i.sSs Ts Dus
chssa bii ~ sobsnao money may laMuny PVT
persons N n Sas horsht aoa "a " .u ~
ysstment or 10 ooI1sca ~ SvOa .sn e,nsr ~ an IN
comnanv NOo' N"e"' Pie'iousV oue 70 Sa'u
?. In ,rcb c..a =, =,
circums," sS Sat eonPe,ent 70 an4W Dy mcS an9
a s within a y, s p S1
tISa an oRect or apurpose Improper or for
4 II II anno.r. az. 49,, s.,.
purpose Of mspr osS or wss aOs ,Or ne
propr"ts sts l9sn oI colscung uept Dut 70 ap
s,oex IN sad company belonging to one Of the
msn - bs Dus nes & 70 such assign
s0nor such tsn,aSto sue % ~ ,S SSs E g Le as
nowera ~ saiS s - ~. w'nn ,ne Sorpoias
socS snbsc,ed ~ " anu right 10 havesuoh
a. And N the ohIsct ty ~ ,Sn -,
was merely 70 subsc Se stc o ~ % M
asssntiDg to such transfer to it's PAYMENT be nprcbaSs
corporate poWers and wonId ot ~ M souse o. I.s
hi WIthhoId its asst =. Los autnoze tne company
vOusly made to third person, though unknown to the
Judgment Of the District Court reversed and the udg
No, q g. iSs Nance SV%%Un asS1or,s risas ai1rned
Error to the DiSty,c. G"U s a. " william uarleton'
sooTT, j. Held: VI "'''s' county
l. That nnder The s,s,,,a >, ,eo, "a a., ,soo,
nuncupatiye viii msds ana n,oraS - SnasS. t1oO
Issufhcient TO pass tite N Isnd, a; t s,t eie'o
ellis and vile " WeIter n nhin ' sas Sa'e, s,,
O. Parol proof Of extynsic soS, .Oiowyu, t
necessary and therefor adm;ssihIs S ~ - "
applying The verbal descrntons ~ e PutpUse .,
to their approprate subiect Ths is 10 u l
jsct Of devise in viii NAV ~ ioa
and unamh,srn,a 80. Sy w apparently pialn cleal'
view Of the cIrcumsnneeS an Wnen ieau 10
the time of making a. NAV hs se ss.s.9r, N
to be- IN part Taise and NAV a. s tUn ,
raH5y s nS premises Intended to Be devised In such
applicable and ihe fsIss . s % n9 Noce u
rejected and effect be Sjye - ~ az s VIII De
the clear intention Of the teststar S''''uins "
3. Where the record shows t6St The nsrtv
tie to lands under a nunounativa w PS ~ . ~
Of the testaors DEATH and duy urovsd AMI sdt,sS ~
record offered said viii In evidence IN az ME- ~;
tie, and was also permitted 10 show hv h tsnna ,h,
devise in said will, 10 his favor ~ ali ,bs iSnd ~
which the testator might die seEed and nos,assd IN
fraction twelve topnsIiD tAyss ana yansa b,ss T.,
the Ohio 0ompany's purchase was sintandd a. Ss.s =.
Of the corresponding fraction m to,orsSS,. o ~ ,h
same range and that the number Of he town,bn IN SsS
but the record does moi al ou W. XIX instead o. @
IN evidence nor disclose the charscsr ~ ~ % ~
jected 10, otherwise than bv sa;ing N. se.t % ~
onu tufi hnIa NNSNS toNioWAAk