Maryland free press., 1862-11-21
BENJAMIN LONG ,s., THOMAS E. BUCHANAN g.
JOHN W. HOOPER.

| MO. I756-In the Circuit Court for Washington
~ County, sitting as Court OF Equity:-The Of
fendsnt Thomas f. Buchanan to ener certsn .redits,
in the bill of complaint part cllsrly set foIths on
certain 9y .he sad Ia9mas NJ ieeo,eTea 20
Court and also satisfaction of said judgment which
said ji gmeut, the said Thomas 4. and the said ThOm.
as b. Ao Jper are now eekirg to revive, nst the
Complainant in this Circuit Court for Washington
County; aud to obtain perpetual Injunction against
further prosecatioa Of said scira aciss su and such
other and further relief the Complansps case may
require. The bill states that Thomis Z. Buchanan in.
stituted suit against Benjamin Long, the complainant
in this cause, IN the late Washingtfn County Court
yember Term thereof in the year 1880 the sum OF
one hundred and thirty dollars and forty sig and two
third cents which suit .he ssid Iho%aa nag
upon the personal estate Of one John Buchanan, late
of said county deceased which the bill alleges was er-
roneous the said judgment ought to have been rem
dered In the individual capac y of the said Thomas,
and not as administrator.
The bill of compa mt further states, that after .hs
recovery of the said judgment sgaiDst the said Long
by the SAID Tbcmas, the said Long geld end delivered
unto the said Thomas sundry articles of Prop
try, properly chargable in account amounting in the
aggr. tie to the sum ffy-sevsn dollars and seventy
FIVE csnts.-That after the said articles furnished
the said Long and informed Linn that he was about
leaving the State of Mar, land or the State Of Calafor
du ing his sbsence vi such artic es necessary for
their comfort aGd that the cost thereof should be cred
Long eid furnish the SAD family Of the said Thomas
in 1859 to the amount Of sl3.OlK, the bill fi,t er
states that the said Thom1s. In the year lsl drew
three several dr. IT, orte rpon theeadL Lg-Ohe
payable to Lewis r. Martin for S13l9, One to Lloyd
Miles for Sss5 and the other in favor of Sim on Ling
/ for $l3f4 which all honored and paid by said
Long, and that agreed by and betwt the said
Long am the said Thomas that the same whe1 paid
the 5tn d.y of July $751; tn. said Long superseded
judgment for said Thomas or s32Os recovered against
tce ofthe pace in nd for Washington County which
Judgment !he sad Long was subsequently competed
Weef the said Lo and the said Thomas thstths said
Long was to have credit on the jud m mt ore'ad
he'd by the said Thomas against the said Long for the
amount thus paid by tine said Long.
The bill further states. taat If the amount CT the
afhes,id accounts OF tbs said Dg against the said
Thomas-the o mt of the aforesaid ORA Is or orders
OF the said TGomas Up the sa Long and which 'he
said Long plid and the amount of the sfores i'd rdg
ments OF Peter Wolf against the said Tnomas ich
said Thomas were lied upon III sa' Judgment OF
the said Thomas against The sad Long, as the sal
Thomas agreed they snoul be the said jude u ent
would hppe upon the records of said Court as hlly
sstis fed and paid. =, At, -
the Ciscut Court for Washington County witt o,
scratacas on his said nd ment aga st the So id Lorg
returnahie to the July Term ss1. offaid our, seek
'aid Long, which stands No 25rr ais March Term
1852, Gu he d cket of said Court
The bli further states that tue said 7 o1as rth'
to embarass tn. said Long and to into effect his
purpose to wrong and deirand the said Lorg the
premises on tn 9Th day OF February 1862, by itain
tretended asst nmelt of said judgment has attempted
to assign and transfer the ce tain John w.
Ho per Ie idert of the State of vi giGis else
where beyond the nris iction OF this Court and had
the said Judgment entered to hs upon the cords
OF ssid Court That the said ThoTas, and the said
Iohn W. Hooper both reside cut the 'ta Q. Mary
land be! oEd jurisdiction cf this Gu
The bill rrays that tn may be re qnred TO appear
in this Cont and answer the tame; nal the said HON
be required to fully answer under his oath all the
mat ers and things crarged in raid bill as fully and
part cularly as il the same especiAll repeated
him. The b.ll also p ays that the sad Thomas ard
John W HOcp their aGen and attorneys be re-
strait ed the further pl osecGt on OF the sa sciraia
cas against the said Long, and that HI the raid
Long be allowed theseveral credits ssid Judgment
as afores.lt. Tho bill also prays for general relief
1t is t Group adjudgedand derel t! at the
plainant B:niamin Long, by causing CO, y of this
Order to be in erted in some spnper ubiShed at
Hagersto IN, CO in each .succes; i've week
month before dhe 10th day OF DeceEibsr next give
tice TO the said absent tefendans the iect and
sub tance of this bill, and warn them TO appear in
this court pe or by solicitor. b5tre the
10Th day of March next to answer the rre ises and
slow case II any they have, why deer e ought no
to be passed as pray cd.
True Copy-Tast:
nov--lm ISAAC NES-ITT, Clerk.