The Burlington weekly hawk-eye. [volume] (Burlington [Iowa]) 1860-1876, 1862-09-27

- soE az I - ------ -----------
g-cun. PMRLPss NANlvE0To. '57
q. r.,,os nv us,ns bsans bssses ~ pablic . -
9. s.s1ot caadidats for Jsd0e Il tie Dtdfse Oe!fs
tsssis Distca and ~ motives havng osse asealled y
~ IsvkHye Il perhaps due 20 myssn ma 49, .
49,. ~Seh are escusied whether dessssdly o. ~,
- s,scs n ia lse podon and which 90 me sfsas "
is.siss -, .h.. ooe Who has resided = lons ~
- shis Community, without intudins himself upon
=. sslics Or askine political hvse, ngAs .: lsae BE-
~ CANDIDATE isr n oes not political In 10 nature
.sss: ~ es q ~o "a o1 S. sns
" .saivss o. hseheaessr ilpeecAed spsa msse supl
-. M however has nss bssn NJ Perfume The Sim
r sf.y ...s a. ITS Up assser
HsSsyise thae there aes maay Rhs WI not eoade@A
..Ss,sd. beg leave . rsply = briefly e poeihls
y - charges eoa'alneS u Ne aeskse: xSu nsvs
1sS shs Mshopy party, and the evidence By whhu you
Hs..t Ia hat my nsas wae Arsl anneunesd In IL
* sao6 ss.sg A a.fh atatensnt = aaas vtA ahsv
nov .anSIisan nomiasaee have bean 1rsad BY beth
..Siesss sad Democrats Who do not eon656te The Of
A. = lido pclteal sAe. ene sho bslsvs change
.:s :ssd !: for judge Axe. sonsdessDs ,sssse
Ss for ne sanouhcemsnt Ia Tie vafloas payss ofsAs
DSsSss when received 2 letsr nom JUDI GAests,
nssioa NH thasesr. sample 1sa tof District Asset.
% q zi's't' Bu,Lrsofou, Sept. sth,, 1858. g
aou. fzos " cI.esfr, Keessk. is.s; :. 31l g Sg'
ID - Ne fse reply by todAytnsn am obliged ~
c.~So - experienced ~ tials al resSsoSibuhiso
Ia 1.aliesions Who yeald a.cune that
rtSS g Ss nss INQUIRIES. "a ia fss: s;sss !.
esdss o. The poas.ss -. ssspss,sos na.nss efta
nsaSset rounas vithsnt eoopromls'ng the Dsnoeratc
ssSepubIsan paftes o. myself havs SivsyS believed
tAss De election Of - log: 800 not p .ae pos
sss portion ofth people q TIA District bath Rspas
i,0sna and Democ,ats -. y
WA these views. am xllins sea,lsv ~ nase = b
a. nsr yasy my political ssntinsots Which are Rspabli-
"a. saA In favor Of upporting the present Admi11.
don b he vigorous prosecution oethe w, AAd Tie cap
IAN informed tAas The announcement Will b made tis
~eek Of NJ name aad hat Of Mr.. Sanple and Iprsesf
thai that should be made q Il WI Be nads
dsslsansou.ly in I'll the papsrss The D'ssst, and Of
xiAch yoa Will be furnished copy L. ansd, os...,
Pay h4 '@ tcaHs. 4. PHELPS. 3
II IL proper to Adj that this was the art and only
eounaaieation had With Judge g. either written YER
viii bs seen from my letter that the announcement
vls b made simultaneously IN ~ the papers in the
District. Why Il ass. appeared In The Colulstleo do
not know, but An told that from Information received
1ea Others and Of which had then knowledge the
editor considered himself suthor sed to make the an
aeaneement and may odd that va much eurprsed
v siss be seen Inst supposed that Nj. Ssple would
be the candidate for District Attorney The publication
Of Mr. Crags name was the nrss intimaon had Of the
oAAase Arriving Ct Keokuk the day ths ticket w an.
nsslced, took occasion to eaqulrs Of Jpdgs Sanl F.
Muller % to the Character qualifications and loyaltv e
Mr. Craig and be laformed me that he US one Of tie
asdthath. had no Cub. Of lis loyalty. sssesd vitS
th could not and would not insult Mr.. Craig BY refu-
ding 70 allow my name to be associated with hs. would
rathsf b defeated. '', - .14 4 lg9
This h oil there vas Of It, II was . mere accident
thas vss hrst announced In that paper upon thsss
fsc any pc son con temns me or accuses Of joining
the Msoony party have no confidence IN his sense 81
justice and not the least regard for his opinion
Asto my correspond ence with Judge Cagett Kany one
con discern ausht dsAoaoFsss or aqsivos In IT, be 4
heartily welcome e make the most OF IT, Conscious d
clait With any man. 20 X Iss9adS 1sbia : 10
10. also substantially caarge me With having been
,ca.dida.e oe:ore The Republican Judicial Convension,
Qusnay endesvor to correct your statement the ooFroc
tSa eoit1ns more errors than the original at,oie. -
Up a the meeting Of our county convention havns a
Of numerous friends oscourss felt anxious for he cm
naon but when found that the chairman Of that con
vsncn would no: put 70 the convsaton the name q
when learned sha: Mayor French nominated one o.
them ee times and only in getting his nam,
Nbnstcd BY deaouucins the chairman flr unfAirnsu
a once. and the day Of the County Convention, IN
nouneed to my friends, one Of whom was Mr.. o. d
Schenek that my name should longer be used Il thai
eoanection and from hour, truthful Will Gal
that ever asked or sought the nomination, took
dnsle step to procure IL. ~
know no rule Of politics or morality that binds mar
To support the nom nsscn Of bio party under sneh Or
cumHaacss especially when the Office Il net a,poisica
That 11'.canva.sei the District, travelling d IN Ii,
ocundss,n b also untrue From the time my name va
mseang Of the Judicial Convention, st NJ Pleasant,
Vas never out Of ttis county but twice. to attend
2xeeu,on sale q Keokuk arriving there day Shd
my family and som, iends my Brother eons up Sat
day and returning on the Monday following. 8,
the best q ny recollection was not Ii Henry sous
pondent In Aenry and Lon - eountieA any IN Lee
except Mr.. Strong Mr. Bsek and one other whose han
It would be improper 70 mention, - presume BE wal
In the ttsvelns ouaesss you must certainly have on
foundei me with one Of the nominee, 20
ALTO not withdrawing ny name until the convente,
met have already stated that 10 my friends, withdiv
eli tho a5 Il Ssf 0ounsy Convention. But, lsvuI
ID By certain parssto .onmit me 70 The nomination,
sh ~ aos. 70 I:q Poole !ss ~s.s
and delivered, b-fors The Convention met 70 Malta,
WestssI (ss could not And Mr. r. aad he authotise
ssss -. ss,,s a: &. a. r.
1ominotio il Which De & sustained oy Tie
o. the rrocsednss Of The Convention. publshsi ID tn
"Hawk.kye" Of Aug. Oh. I p - - tt9E
H. ssyos sstm 70 suppose. u. ago Of my RspabAesn
Of any cous4q 3eaee perhaps may Important
state the 'ot NJ rracys devotion the Repsbiisa.
party sid whether svea Jedge sprtusess has hot been
dry.docket aod repaired within the past dx mouths.
As the possbi ~ Of ny receiving Denocrac votes
aad its weight as evideaee Of my change Of principle
my rar fev ~ Of the Asto OF Judicial elections IL
las Die rCs, for epAst ten Year,, win monstrate III
Itter aaconclusveusss and show how little OF charity
there Is In the us naation ~ 10
since 1888 Vi. ocratic part Of shis pisr,c. have
never Nominated can;.idae for Judse Of the Osssie'
Court Nor ave rey a. any Judicial election since that
year voted With AFFINITY TOR any candidate. Neithe,
have the Wing Republican parties voted eth unsnii
~ at those elections aad though the Repubiean party
has NJ Minated four Judges previous to he present nom
sns'ion the members of The party have voted for asd
against ther nominee and no one has heretofore
Thought q charging then with uufahialnsss 70 thu psr
ty Ii 1852 Judss Love defeated the re ~ Democratic
nominee BY nand.ome maioay, the District being Thea
strongly Democratic IN 1856 Judge Clsgest, the IND
pendent candidate, defeated Mr. Darwin, the resu1
= publican kictf lapa