Indiana State sentinel. (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1861-1865, 1862-06-16
Supreme Court Decisions.

Jerusha Hanna ct al. VS.. The Indiana Central
Railroad Company-Delaware @. G. Reversed.
Ruel Starr VS.. Jacob Forbes-Porter G. p.
Affirmed with Z per cent. damages.
Thomas D.. Walpole VS. Joseph b. Atkinson
Hancock G. @. Affirmed with / per cent dam
ages.
Miles2Hunt VS.. Zenoah Beesin-Randolph G.
O. Affirmed.
Aaron B.. Fetlener vs.. The State of Indiana
De Kalb c. p. Affirmed.
John Sober vs.. The State of Indiana-Grant
G. G. Reversed.
Calvin Hood VS.. The State of Indiana-Grant
G. c.. Affirmed
David Conner VS.. The State-Grant G. G. AT
frmed in part and reversed IN part.
Adam Porter vs.. Thomas M~illard-Carroll G
P. Affirmed with one per cent.
George W. Potter VS.. Anna Owen and Samuel
Judah-Knox @. G. Dismissed.
Andrew f. Dahuff VS.. Matthew Saville-How-
ard G. C. Reversed.
Archibald Simpson, Administrator of the es
tate of William Simpson, deceased, vs.. George
W. Potter-Knox c.. P. Reversed as to the judg-
meni below in favor of the garnishee.
Charles Colts VS.. The State-Floyd G. P.
Dismissed for want of assignment of error.
Alonzo Thompson VS.. The State of Indiana
Marion c.. c. Affirmed.
Luke F.. French VS.. The State of Indiana-Ma-
rion c. G. Affirmed.
SEVENTEENTH DAY.
The State ex. rel. James Long VS.. Daniel Long
-Tippecanoe c.. P. Affirmed.
Christian Conepler VS.. The Stale. Henry G.
P. Reversed.
Andrew Shafer VS.. The State-Cass C.P. AT
frmed in part and reversed in part.
Frederick Shurtz ct al. VS.. John s.. Woolsey-
Lagrange G. P. Affirmed.
Isaac Firestone VS.. David Mishler-Elkhart c..
P. Affirmed.
Johu Reed vs.. David Armstrong-Fayette G.
P. Affirmed with three per cent. damages.
Sarah Waltz VS.. Jacob Waltz-Bartholomew
G. c.. Reversed.
James H. Carr, Assignee, &C., VS.. Samuel
McConaha-Hancock G. P. Affirmed.
James H.. Case alias Claypool and Richard W.
Horner VS.. The Stste-Green C.P. Reversed.
Samuel II. Patterson and David W. Miller vs..
James Prior-Clark G. G. Reversed as to Mil
Ter and affirmed as to Patterson.
This was a case in which a person who was con-
victed by a Court Of Common Pleas, and who
was afterwards released from the penitentiary on
a writ of habeas corpus, because the court had no
jurisdiction, sued the warden and lessee of the
State prison for work and labor performed while
in their charge. He recovered in the court be-
low against Patterson and Miller 1925. Patter-
son and Miller appealed. The judgment was re
versed as to Miller, the warden, but affirmed as to
Il tttlSOlg WIZ ~ ~ 40 AZ
eft of the prisoners labor.
EIGHTEETNH DAY.
Pliny Hoagland VS.. the Cincinnati Railroad
Company-Allen c.. @. Affirmed.
John Cahon vs.. the State-W arren G. P. AT
frmed.
Two other cases between the same parties were
similarly decided
James r. P. Thorne ct al. VS.. Joshua Thornt
Knox @. p. Reversed.
William Beyl VS.. the Charlottesville, Frank
fort and Kokomo Railroad Company-Clintor
G.. p. Affirmed with l per cent.
George Glasscock VS.. Thomas Lyons-Foun
tain G. c.. Reversed.
Frederick Riley VS.. VIM. @. Mitcher-Kno
G. p. Affirmed with 5 per cent.
Michael Thompson VS.. David L. Jones anC
wife-Delaware @. G. Reversed.
VIM. Hageley VS.. VIM. Hutson-Union G. @
Reversed.
Thomas Reed VS.. james j. HamiIton-Henry
G. @. Affirmed.
Powhattan NJ. Garner VS.. Charles Frederick
Floyd G. c.. Reversed.
John Linderman VS.. Henry O.. TOdd-Hen
bricks @. G. Affirmed with 5 pei cent.
Mary Jane Freeman ct al. VS. State ex. rel.
Commissioners of Decatur county ct al.-Deca
tur c.. p. Affirmed with | per cent.
Samuel Every VS.. Levi Smith-DeKalb @. @
Affirmed with 5 per cent.
David Stoner ct al. VS.. B. F. Brown--Laport'
G. G. Affirmed with A per cent.
Eliza Ford VS.. the State-Marion G. p. Re
versed.