Maryland free press., 1862-11-14
BENJAMIN LONG ". THOMAS e. BUCHANAN .
JOHN w HOOPER. a.

IN County, sitting Court Of Eauity:-Ths ss
fsndaD, Thomas Z. Buchanan to enter certain crsdit
In the bill OF complaint particularly set forth1 on
against the complainant in the late Washington County
Court, and also satisfaction Of said judgment whieh
a he oe ssia S,na 70 1svive' ,asin,t -.
Complainant in the Circatt Court for Washington
County aud 70 obtain psrPsta.l Injunction ;gainss
further pros, sutton Of said sers sess sn and such
other and further relief As the ComplAnsns case may
require The bill states that Thomas Il. Buchanan In
situted sit against Benjamin Long, the complainant
in this cause, in the late Washington County Court
seaSsT TsT% Is.
hundred and thirty dollars and forty six and two
ted in his representative capacity Of Admin isretor
upon the personal estate OF one John Buchanan late
OF said county deceased hich the bill alleges
roneous, the said judgment ought to have bsen rem
dersA in the individual capacity OF the said Thonas
and not as adj illustrator.
The bill or compla MT further ,tatss that after the
recovery of the said judgment against the said Long
by tho said hcas, the seid Long seld and delivered
unto the said Thomas sundry articles OF personal prop
erry properly chargabe in account amounting In the
aggregate to the sum ffftysevsn dollars and seventy
to the said Thomas he the said Thomas called upoa
the said Long ard informed him that he was about
leaving the State Of for the State Of Calafor
MIA, desired the said Long to furnish his family
duIing his absence with such articles necessary for
tied upon the said Judgment. whessxpon he ssl4
Long did furnish the said family Of the said Thomas
states that the said Tho@,s. In he year 1851, drew
three several drafts OF orders upon the said pgone
:s hs in o ss sS s
for $544, which were ali honored and paid BY said
Long, and that i was agreed BY and Ssssssp the s.d
snould also be credited upon said Judgment. Thst on
the 3n day Of Jniy 1851, III said Long supeTssdsd
tice ofthe peace in for Washington County, which
judgment the said Long subsequently com pelled
to pay, and did pay and that agreed by and BE-
tween the said Long and the said the said
tbs said Thorsss against ths aid Long for -.
amount thus psid by the said Long
The bill further states that II the amount Of the
Thomss,hs amount of the Aforesaid drafts or orders
of the said Thomas uen the said Long and which the
Wof saS Se 81 said Tnes.
was supe seded and paid BY the said Long Cor ins
the said Thomas against the SAID Long, as the Gaid
Thomas agreed they snsul be the said !udsraent
would appear upon the records Of said Court ss fully
That the said Thomas In t0e ys.r 1857 sued oss of
scrac.s on his said judgment against the said Long
reunable to the July Term 1881 Of said Court, seek
aE esvs as s:S the
1852 on the docket OF said Court
The bill further states that the said T further
to embarrass the said Long and 70 carry into effect his
purpose to wrong and defraud the said Long IN the
premises on the 9Th day Of February 1852 by certain
pretended assignment Of said judgment has attempted
to assign and transfer the same to certain John W
HoopF resident of the State Of Virginia, or else
whse beyond the jurisdiction Of this Court end had
ths1Ad judgment entered to his upon the records
OF said Court. That the said Thomas, end the said
John W. Hooper both reside Of the State of Mary.
land beyond the jurisdiction Of this Court.
The bill prays that thsy may be required to appear
In this Court and the same; that the ssid Thom
r. nG y under s as oath Al q:
particularly ss the same were especial, repeated
him. The bill also pIays that the said Thomas and
John W. Hooper, their sgen,s and attorneys be re-
strained in the further pi osecuon of the ssd scisfs
eiss case against the said Long, and that he the sad
Long be allowed the several credits said Judgment
as sforcssd. The bill also prsys for general relief
u Is thereupon sdiudged and ordered that the COM
plsinant Benjsmin Long, BY causins a cory Of this
HagefstoT n, orce IN each snccsssivs week ier oAs
month before the 10th day Of Decenber next give no
cs TO the said absent defendants Of The object and
substance Of this bill, and them to appear IN
this court IN by solicitor on or before the
18th day Of March next to answer the prem ises and
snow cause II any they have, why dscrs ought net
to BIO passed as prayed.
True Copy-Test
nor7-im ISAAC NEsBIrr, Clerk.