Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1862-02-27
GENERAL DOCKET.

A0uOTfeF. N~-f~-@~sel
..'.s..-..,.t TOEsDAy, Feb. ss, 1862.
GENERAL DOCKET.
MOI The President, Directors and Companv az ths
Commercial Bank OF Oincinnati V. Horatio I,ucr,nr.
- o..e. Error to the Court Of Common Pleas
sc county. Reserved In the District Court.
!. when, on the motion OF defendant and upon q
so6s c,.,,, u answer that persons, not before the
osm 70 nave some interest In the subject matter
o. lne SUIT suen persons made defendants IN the al.
on by process requiring them to anaweY Inc
tns panhni tne answer OF tho original defendant not
poDg IN tne nature OIL cross petition and asking no
relief asagainst the parties defendant IL E erros for
the court, on default OF such new parties for n
upon rights Of the defendants iater so' by
newly made co-defendauts. -l"e '
u oucn unauthorized adjudication IL substantiAl
error and not mere irregularity. -,
- 70 order mat final Judgment may bs reviewed
reverseu, vacated, or modified It s mot necessary tha
ne party seeking is reversal should have excepted Il
suen maj Judgment at the time Of lts rendition
.h ol tne oonrt Of Common Peas modified By
rights OF the defendants below fer te So AZ 10 isays
those rights unaffected BY the decree. : w.
Judge 0holson did not cit In this case, t.fa riG
Mo- ~, The Lafa elite Bank OF Cincinnati v. Jayome
Bu9ESgoam. In error Reserved Ia the District oOur
OF Licking county. s'-'
The petition states that the plaintln Is creditor Of
me Lcking County Bank. branch OF the State Bank o
Ohoi that said bank became nsolyent and IL aaae,s
real and perH0nal. Daaaed intn
Bank OF Ohio or Board OF ControI ~ ss v
ruay a. le45, Ito incorporate the stae BanS n mi,
and other banklng companes; that the defendsnt VA
appointed by the State Bank receiver Of he a.ses 81
said branch and took possession on the ssma srd ~
while possessed he purchased the asseiS and ,s,vd
from the State Bank cOnyeyance Of the real estate
and mas neglected to sell and convert the aaaeta int
money but holds and claims the by vue Of such
purchase ara conveyance as his own. The petition
pray9 discovery and account, that a new rcceiyer
may be appointed, that the may be duly adInis
Held: F'''''-'
cause Of action against the defendant.
By section "a OF said bank act oflei5 the propeyv
real and personal, Of the nsoyent bank became yssted
In the State Bank in trust for he puTnosss H.
the act. -F f-F'@1 81
g. The defendant receiysr to be regarded AZ IN,
ministerial officer agent Of the State RAM and AZ
ing under lts direction in settling mn ihe assIrs =, NJ,
insolvent bank. - - -'' " Wv
Judgment affirmed. .s H. .HI--s
.Il Morrov nocv,n .lra
No. I02. Horace g. TAYLOR a,siopea. .tc y Jsbas w
Fitch ct al. Motion for rehearipr oyerruied
No. lO4. David Tanner '. Mary johnson. Leave 10
No. los. Daniel Norman v, Jamea Gaorgs. Lava N
fle petition IN error refused. N'0'eN' -S~'' "
No ll2 EIihu Thorn v. Erastus M. Hiych. I.savs N
hle petition In error refused, 80 '' '~'' ~
No, ia. Daniel q, Raw " ceoroe T. Mava, n, .i
Leave 10 Ale petition In error rafu,ed w NJ
Mo- lis. Isaac Runyan y. William n p,,,. a, .,
Leageto hle petition in error granted.
No, ll0, DoolIttIe a OhamherIaIn y Edw.uI u.ci.
Tough. Motion for rehearinx oyerTuled.
No. III. The Directors Of The CipeiunatI A. xenis
Turnpike Company " The Civ IN cSnctnnsa Ittas.s.
tive writ Of mandemus allowed,
No. Ile. Oharles PosdIck v, The Mavoy and ,us,.s.
OF Pefrysburgh. Alternative Writ Of msnSam1s sIIow
/ No. 100. The State ex rel. John a HavAIett y GAM
mel Arthur, Auditor Of Muskinrum onntv. MoiIon N
take the case No. 329 on General Doeket an, arsr
oyerruled y ~'''-' -,S'-'' - Wv VI i'' 0i~oi'
! No. ll3 John q, rhompson. T,ea.u,a, ~ v,.rGi,n
County, Relator, v, John PhilIinS Lraitnr ~ ..,d
County. lr7 - 81 = ---'r.' 'N''O' 'N''O' " 'e'N
4 The ralator n Treasurar ~ pr.nLi,r co,... u.
term Of once coumsnced an ~. a.. Ms.v. sn
teber 1900 ana will continue TO ia arst Ionaav X