Indiana State sentinel. (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1861-1865, 1862-12-01
STATE NEWS, ETC.
DecIsions Of the supreme cour..

Hiram Abdill ct al. vs.. John Hamilton-Foun-
tain c. G. Reversed.
Alexander S. Whitehall vs. State ex rel Nor
gan Jones ct al.-Fouutain c. p. Affirmed.
Ezekiel johnson vs.. Anon W. SeymOur--La-
giange c. p Affirmed. with costs.
William r. West eG al. VS.. Berry W Cooper
Hancock c. G. Reversed
Jesse t. Williams VS. David Cowell--Wayne
c. c. Affirmed, with , per cent.
George B. Hutchens VS. Samuel Hanna, ex r.
Allen c. c. Affirmed. with costs.
COrmicOn Hays vs.. James J. Gwin-White O.
p. Affirmed.
Samuel Lord ct al VS. Samuel Fisher ct al
Franklin c. p. Affirmed.
Elijah Snowden ct al VS.. Sallie Il. Wiles ct
al-Huutingtou G. q. Reversed
James B Cook ct al vs.. James W. Anderson
Shelby c. p Affirmed. 3 per cent.
Jane Wilets VS.. Otbneil Beeson ct al.-Wayne
c. p Affirmed.
Jackson King vs. Edward O. Sumner-Foun
tain c.. .. Reversed.
SECOND DAY.
Eliza Shepperd VS.. JOHN Beebe. Ripley G. p.
Reversed and remanded.
President and Directors of the Terre Haute and
Richmond Railroad Company vs.. Samuel Smith.
Putnam c. 2 Reversed, and remanded to be
dismissed
Albert S White vs. Daniel J Callinan. Tippe-
canoe c. P. Affirmed, with per cent. dam
ages.
Benjamin F. Kenyon ct al. VS.. Michael Will
liams ST. Joseph Q. C. Affirmed
John c. Brackmer. administrator vs.. Robert
Heath ct al TippecanOe G. p. Affirmed.
Jacob Lamb ct al vs.. Giles 5. Donovan ct al.
Tippecanoe C. I. Affirmed.
Ephraim A. Greenlee vs.. Jerigan Eastman ct
al. Tippecanoe c. c. Affirmed
Alexander II. Grouse VS.. David Holman. Tip
pecanOe G. @. Reversed.
Henry Ewald ct AL vs.. August Coleman. Law
renee @. p. Injunction affirmed. Cause to pro-
coed.
Valentine Wood -. John Kennedy. Wayne
G. F. Reversed.
John Roche VS.. Francis Washington. Hunt
ington c. c. Affirmed.
James Noble ct AL VS.. Magdalene Enos ct al.
Franklin c. @. Reversed
Lewis Hittner VS.. the State Floyd @. @. Re
versed.
THIRD DAY.
Richard Graver ct al VS. William Ray ct al.
Hendricks G. P. Reversed.
Indiana Central r. W. vs.. Z. s. Gulick Marion
&C. Reversed.
Jacob Il Best ct al vs. Jacob B. Powers. How
ard G. c. Reversed.
John T. Dunlevy ct al. VS. the State ex rel.
George Sheeks, admir-. Lawrence G. c Affirmed
Wayne c. G Affirmed, per cent
David Stinson vs. the State Vanderburgh c.
p. Reversed.
Miriam A. Maxwell ex parte. Marion C. P
Affirmed.
Henry NJ Enely ct al VS. Nichols Patterson
Shelby CP. Affirmed, 5 percen~
David Conner VS.. the State. Grant @. Re
versed-
State of Indiana VS.. David Thomasson War
rem T. c. Affirmed
William S. Shucra(t ct TX William Divid-
son. Wayne c. C. Rsversed-remanded with
costs
Thomas z Teter ct al. vs. John Hindes ct al
Clinton c. c. Reversed.
State ex rel Mary Arthur VS. Elisha E. Evans
Davies G c. Affirmed
John W Knight W. Simon BambeFgeT. Nor
gan c. c. Affirmed, per cent
Isaac Adkins VS. Granville Whissenand. Mon
roe G. G.. Reversed
FOURTH DAY.
This being Thanksgiving Day the Court did
not convene.
FIFTH DAY.
James G. Ricketts, vs. U Lostetter. Ohio @
G. Affirmed. per cent.
Patrick Tube VS.. Henry Eber Delaware c. P
Reversed.
John Vodegal ". David Devvan. Ripley C P
Affirmed.
Nathan Myers vs. the State Allen c. C
Reversed
James H Martin ct al VS.. James Anderson e
James Rudd ct al. vs.. Jacob Giles ex rel
johnson c. c. Reversed.
Willie g. Atherton W.. r. " Williams. Mad
isOn @. G. Affirmed, 3 per cent.
John Gorden ct al. VS.. James Montgomery
Floyd c. @. Affirmed. per cent
George Shannon vs. Zachariah Wilson. Jeffer
son Q. q. Reversed.
William T Reynolds ct al VS.. George Hicks
Tippecanoe q @. Reversed.
David d. Mayer VS. Peyton S. Symmes Obi,
c c. Reversed.
David L. Cowrey ct al. vs.. Benjamin Lewis
Franklin c. p. Affirmed.
SEVENTH DAY.
David Macy ct al VS. Daniel Titcomb Marion
G. G.. Reversed.
jesse T. Matlock VS.. Henry g. Todd Hen
bricks c p. Affirmed
VIM. Patterson ct al. vs.. Benz. Reynolds. Tip
pecanoe c. G.. Reversed
Thos. ID. Barker VS. Vim. 5. T. Morton. Ma
ron G. P. Affirmed
williamson Wright ct al. VS. State ex rel. Jan
Varty. Pulaski G. G. Affirmed. with ) pc
cent. damages.
Lewis Everhart ct al vs. Joseph Hollingsworth
Grant Q. c. Affirmed
Addison Daggy vs.. Daniel H Cox. Montgom
cry c. @. Reversed.
Robert johnson vs.. Frederick Saam ct al
Floyd G. G. Affirmed.
In the case Of Patterson VS.. Reynolds it wa
decided in the Court below that a sinking fun
sale was not valid because of its not being mad
at the.Court House door at indianapolis tn
Supreme Court reversed this decision, and he'll
that the sale was virtually made ut the Cour
House door; the fact being that the Commits
sioner announced the time of sale at the from
door Of the Court House. and then, owing to th
inclement weather, proceeded to the Judge
stand and continued the sale there.
In the case of Barker VS.. Morton it was bel
that the lien upon personal property for take
does not attach before the duplicate is deIivere
TO the collector.
JUDoE JERRY Smith The Winchester jour
nal of "A dafa n low ccnrrou