Cincinnati daily press. [volume] (Cincinnati [Ohio]) 1860-1862, 1862-02-20
January l6, 1862. ia2
S,TATE or OHIO, HAMILTON COgNTY,
STATE OHIO, HAMLLTON COgNTY,,

1F 0SBBhS2 SBhSdE sgs
lSClli 1.-The above. named defendant, Elisha
Sa b Of fPe sts alta Of m Ohio t
Of Common Pleas Of Hamilton County, Ohio, his pe
snG sip5 ss Ss@ nd 64 S S s
tract OF mortgaeed land in said county, descr'S-
All that tract of land in the north west quarter "
section 81 (as described in the answer and cros{
fret entire range in the Miami Purchase contain.
ing foTty-two acres, more or less and bounded on
east 6y lar DE- Of B. s. BuInet and Joseph Jackson.
on the south by lands Of the heirs Of Ephraim
JCremibh Salmon
tb ad FIJI sSa st r @ bdTs
22d day of March, 1862, and set no hs lien upon or
interest in said land, an order will be taken in his
jS28fwy ROBERT MOORE, Attorney.
TUE STATE OF ,OgIO, HAMILTOF
4 COUNTY, SS.-superior Court Of Cincinnati
snd wilson BTSss
neEs ss Evans o., plaintiffs VS.. Robert Nswoom !
com com {dSSTfTS, H9SSes % g. GhiP$sn, george aiii.,
pie, John q u GuisngeG And William D; ohtPmsN 1'n
l., Brown and John u. Guisinger, partneSs as Gui.-
The said defendants, George Gilispis, John L.
Suisipger and William LPBrown, are hereby mott.
s& tasi Ai said 6Cn Ee SS6
against said defendants, which iS still pendin !
and interest from February l, 1861, on a draft OF
G. mber ;, 1885, and the said desndants are notsec
that William B. Williams and Samuel v. Ried, part,
have been served garnishees in this action thai
an order Of attachment has been issued in said 40
ton and levied upon the following described PreL-1
All that certain lot or parcel of ground situated
the south.w corner Of Richmond and JObn
streets and running thence southerly along the Ia
OF JChn street sixty one feet, and the same Width
| igck at right angles seventy feet; thence norta
aweba
Cincinnati County Of Hamilton, Ohio, on the nsris
side OF Sixth-street, between OentrSl-svsnus anal
tRS & Sun1sd sna fhS RGE
26ol feet west of at the east side uI
Trustee thence running ealt twenty one (2ij feet
and running back northwardly the same widtiA
street
The said defendants are required to answer or ID
| December, A. d 1861 otherwise Judgment will II
taken against them and said attached propert
Ocsi-fWy M ii i W TILDEN, for plaintiffs.
TEHK sTATE or OHIO, oHAMILTOi
| n COUNTY, sS.-lhe Superior Court Of GnsH
Hughs and Wilson r. Drake, PsTtners, a. ESsni
| Co,, plaintiffs, versus Washington butcher sS
isndents and Anthony Bullock and Morris ofser
| Garnishees. The said defendants, Butcher BroSE
1907 the sSd psnif u sd ed their be- pIS peS II
Said HoaIt, alleging therein that on the rs NJ
| certain bill Of exchange for the sum Of 95,(V
snS 6v dFsStod Ws the same to the said Be
that aitery&Pd, At the request and for the bsseur
| discounted BY these plaintiffs, at their BanBt NJ
house in Cincinnati that there is due these pireo
titis from defendants, said draft, the said ~
Of IS co., and interest from May l, 1861 and Il Sn =
| said defendants notified that the said Hosrbo5
| Drum and Anthony Bullock have been serveSigh
garnishees In said action. Defendant are reQu IaI
| 70 plead, answer or demur TO said petition, or SiT
before the 2lst day of December, A d. 1851 or. m
wise, Judgment will be rendered against them ~,
the property or credits of the said Butch n ., ~
| Brother In the possession o. control Of the - EI
garnishees be subjected to the payment thereof ~
oo24Th M, ii W. TILDRN, for Plsinti6oni