The Cadiz Democratic sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1854-1864, 1862-01-22

any purpose OF conquest or subjugation, mol
for the purpose ofoverthrowing or interfering
with the rights or established institutions o
the States, but to defend and maintain the
supremacy Of the Constitution, and to pre-
serve the Union with all the dignity, equality
and rights Of the several States uniDpaired
and that as soon as these objects are accom-
plished the war ought to cease.
Resolved That in the adoption OF the fore
going resolution by Congress with unprece'
dented unanimity at its late session, rule
of action was prescribed to the Government
from which it should not depart; and from
which the Federal Legislature cannot depart
without an utter disregard OF its plighted
faith. Against any such departure we sol
emnly protest
"ResolveH, That the above resolution, be
ing embodied in the State platform OF the
Democratic and Union parties, constitutes the
ground upon which the whole body OF ioya
citizens of Ohio cordially and vigorously
unite in the support OF the war and the Ad'
ministration.
| Resolved, That while we joyfully observe
| the spirit OF moderation and conservatism
pervading the last annual message of the
| President of the United States, we deprecate
/ the mad attempts now being made by a
certain class OF politicians in Con-
gress to obtain control of the National Leg
islature and Executive for the purpose Of ef.
fecting their scheme Of negro emancipation as
military necessity t
"Resolvea, That slavery Is State institu-
| tion. guaranteed as such by the Constitution
and laws of the United States, and we can
not agree that the National Government shall
undertake the emanc' patton OF slaves against
the will OF the slaveholding States, as mil
itary necessity. or on any ground whatever.
"Reso1ved, That a copy OF the foregoi &
resolutions be forwarded by the Governor ol
Chic to he President Of the United States,
and to our Senator's and Representatives in
Congress, to be laid before the House OF Rep,
resent atlves ... ;...
Laid on the table by vote as follows:
"Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Babcock. Bartram, Bates Bayard, Brachman,
Bradbury, Clark, Cory Dckman, Fee of Vim
ton, Fer VI, Harrison, Harsh. Hills. llix,n,
Howard. Howe, Jo' nso". Kcck. keyser OF
Noble, Krum, Lind Masters, Miller. Mont
gomery. Myers. McG1l, Norris, Odlin, Os,
born, Pa ,erson. Pierce, PurSell, Randall,
Reilly. Robb Roberts, Rockwell. Ross, >rhell
Scott, stanton. Stewart, Silver, Tiffl7y,
Wallar. w ,rnar, Whitney, Wilkins, Wood
bury. Speaker 81
Those who voted in the negative were:--
Ault, Bitckar Converse, Crane, Dresel, Fee
OF Brown, Ferguson, Flagg, Glcssncr. G ib-
ben, Giiiwold, High, Holden, Huston, def
hies. Kennon Key>er OF Monroe, Lemen,
Lott, Mafiitt, Marsh, Means, Monroe, Nc
IL Nh
Smythc, SNYDER, StearS, Tayler, Ihorp.
Titus, Uhl, Vance, Wells, WllSon-38
So, most of the representatives of
the Uniou party, in three months af-
ter the election, are guilty of the bad
faith of repudiating and kicking aside
the, measures to which they solemnly
pledged the people they would adhere,
and without which many of them
would not be in the place where they
are. 1t is an act of unparalleled peril
dy. The rejection of these resolu>
tons unmasks and stamps them as hy-
pocritcs of the deepest dye. The
Democrats voted for it in Congress
and in their State Convention at Co.
lumbus, and they stand by it now
They kept their faith with the people.
The politicians who oppose it are for
converting the war for the Union to
one of negro emancipation, They
dare not make the issue bofore the peo-
pie, but steal cowardly into power and
place upon false pretense!-Cin. Enq.