Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1862-01-30
Gl.tle:'Olbio 6tatesnrarr
TIE z II
i4sIprene Court OF ohio .

Weekly, per yeai q. az
==-.:--=s=-.=-
4 t'' supreme Court OF ohio.
\ apa1N s7Bisls-->-[ $50 .gT7grg1f
Mo; ss.iah Scott Chief Justice; Hon. Milton sutla,
i1on. Ion william Peck Hon William Z. Ghoisop, and
non. Jacob Brnksrhoa, judges. y. Crilchaeid, Ne
S''.oi''aq 10 bioysb T0nsD1r, Jan. %, 1859.
1 evsd HbHSs GENERAL DOCKET. .1, N n
Hosvi The RBt Prssbyterlan Society, ete.. of Gall.
polls, BY Alexander p. Roger, eft, al " John N
SMsaen stal. Hrf0rto t6e District Court II Gais
D BRisKtRaooI, o. ffeld 'd. as-V sgn- iza Ji
Inc ate as oorporatofs, o. trustee Dc Jccto Of
~ ~ religious society, cannot bs impesehsd
tTussss ~ % By showing that they not
~ Ths can DO done only In d direct
p,ocedns py Information 10 the nature Of oao toar
'pp,"S, paS - HatsHliu plf siasDao c.3hs 5l- t5f {.
such S sStloa p persons claiming to be trustees Of
The possession Of tho real property Of such
an answer By the defendants denynE that the
afe such trustees, and svsrring that they the
are such trnstses presents an Isue under
o and pof the code OF civil procedure as 10
s pnunT esa capacity 10 sue; which issue s prop
Sptri.d !, /, jsry, and such an Issue remaining
to dsmiss the petition. '- '' S''NA~
Judgment reversed y .aa sli
No, 81 Western College Honeopathio Medieips '
wv ei Olevsiand Reserved In District Court Of Cuy.
ahoga county. JaiI il SN'' w
rbs ~, L., =. :, ~, n, 4, .,,....
1895 provded sn", 49, s s o. vIeveiard, passed Ia
Oily 0ounc 1T shall be their Srty 10 r.as 70 me
and d,ordsry ss.smS.ss prevent disturbances
i've and apPsIaInipg to an admnista
~ ~ making regulations, by laws and ordinances
nent of oscsys. snS ~ ns snIorceo py tne appoint
rem me eneot Of that enactment the city Of Oeye
riotous esqemblags ~ ns,'or ~ s ~ properly ~
ocsrs in moi pressryDa bs 81 or .ns neglect Of The
destructlon. INC peace ana preventing such
Demurrer to petition sustained. and judgment for de.
No. GO. WIN, g. Ward AZ al - sr.o,u.h .t.,...
Error to District Court Of Washington county.
RHcK, j.. .staao .a.T n IL go res e!-
during his marriage with g.. convsvsd ~ .'rs. ~
with covenant Of general varrsr, "a s as. snns ~
session Of the same TO w. SoIfch IL l1s rsirsd "a.
other soSrcS UUOn tbs d.s.sss nOe q gGsss's'0 ron any
tltion against W.. to obtain dower IN ala ~
Held: WV f'~-1'''' =
o, ~. Ina, tns possession Of NJ under general claim
Ps r. M. and nd sufficient s contrary appears
and those caimine undsr him a'ie ~ Ss~ns' "'
ID. That W., under such oircurnst.nce. a., an .n,,,
cation for dover by the widow Of M l. precludsd rom
connect himssIf ~. tN- VAN "ii''u w s0es n''
eth. Thata finding bv thu oourt ths, no ...,-u.a
from denying the title Of his Rrantor n
reversa unless II appeared from the record
trov ri tbottitS. If- ~ Wv
5th. That the following Certificate ~ oolro,.so..
TG cdc 10 :, - ~ - ''I''-''
MiRtSrTx Inv iNh Vi yaSs SSsV'Hit'{
s.The above named John nlfntcsb ~ 'Svv. Sr..
Wife, she being examined apart from her husSsns agree
ably to law and the contents of tbis dsd s
her. the slrners and ssasrs ~ .h maus knoMn 20
personally appeared and acknovledged the .srs ~ x
thsir free and yolun ary act and deed. before me "
= y ss5ILA1 D0rK Jns,i.s ~ az ID D. ,,
q mt u, NJ - ~ -.'-S' " 'Io hsas'
~ % 70 par ner right OF dover uader the act
: JUDGMENT sfir,pasg De law n.
- ~ aissented as to the nth proposition,
"a W ~ stouna ot ,sars asetets. b. lss U u -
SO. 90. Aloe q Burnett ". George W. Whitney,
hI1or 10 20 ne District Court Of ouyahogs county.
Tbs.,As VSusI. ,..a:, "a. ..gs2 '.Llt ~ ~
g more .unnsry Crspesdy remedy sSsnsi he debt.
~ We n peLendant 10 atAchment than their cred
W. principal upon which tie provisions In the
resisting TO atachents were framed. This prineI.
Y ..oton y nsxS o;ss departed from n an amend
Mnsn ssows an execution as upon Judgment. where
10 csrs, ID. ~. z.minauon, 10 ordered 70 pay money
ceednTs before ns.s os me uoes to pro-
.sinynee required 70 aPpsar and submit to OK.
~ .h ana tne Justice comes TO the conclusion
samssioS ~ maze py .ne ssshee amount to an
mit,sS ~ " osnsoness, ne may older the sum ad.
~ ~ ~ que 20 % PAID into court. But the only
mode by which such an order can be enforced IL nv an
action against the garnishee. The stion and the
order thsrsupon were not Intended a. summary rene
Of me debt but to put the plaintiff
defendant in attachment against The esrpSbee IN the
ordinary mode-by action. The action would be a use.
sss sna sxpensye form the Earnishee had been al
garnahee could be made In all casoa with clear nm
deIsnding OF his rights and liabilities and In such man.
otood ~ ssnrid ~ ,s mlsssAteo nor misunder'
"vu W enpun 70 give 70 those Htatemer ts
60 conclusive snsst and admit no explanation It would