Cincinnati daily press. [volume] (Cincinnati [Ohio]) 1860-1862, 1862-02-11
STATE OHIO, HAMILrON COUNTY,

A DMINISTRATOR'S SALE OF REAL
the Probate Court u Hamilton County, Ohio to me
the rotuda Of the Hamilton County Court. house, on
MONDAY. January 20; 1862, at o'clock. p. N the
Il. Morris, deceased, te wit:
Lot marked &C." on plat on file in this case, be-
and and extending back to the iaodins. Appraised az
$1,000, in Hamilton County Ohio.
known as Smith Morris subdivision n the 6if.
ton County Records Of Deeds. Valued at four hun
dred 5000 dollsrs for each lot
same subdivision. Valued at four hundred $4,000
Also Lots su@bered 4s, A and l4s Valued at
four HUNDRED and eighty s4so( dollars for each lot
bdndTeS apS S HSS S gna 1 eNoS vgSa at two
AlsOI;Lois Nos q and 72; Valued at four hun
aFeS ad s Hsae s at sSS5 S N
dollars for each lot: Lots Nos lO2 and iO4. Valued
d H I0s 0nnSsd SCs C HSd tS snS S S% % 9
dollars for each lot Lots Nos ll2, l22 and l24.
XSoff Xss H. It's fave @ dss saS for ss 'n s tSs
ts7S) collars for each lot. Lot No; 7o; Valued at
Mo- ead at SGs5s
SSA5l d9llars & Lot No. ls9 Valued at three hun;
at sffS snS S sac @ 5 dollars: SR 49, 1S SSa SS
az; Valued at two hundred and four @s2OD dollars.
four (ss2ll dollars. L9t No; i5l: Valued at one
hundred and seventy CSl70) dollars: Lot No. l67.
Terms sale a, oows Of the
money to be paid in cash on the day of sale; one
sale, and onethird in two years from the day of
such conI nation; deferred payments to be secured
by mortRaG e on the premises, aud to draw interest
at the rate Of six per cent per annum from the
hrmation Of sale. Said property will be sold the
Sarah L. Morris and W. b. Morris, 2dmiaistratoTs
of the estate Of VIM. r. Morris, deceased, against
County Probate Court, being petition to sell land,
ana VIII be sold iree from dover or other interest
on the part OF any of the defendSnts p sSa cHse
deli 9TH Surviving administrator
TVNBE STATE OF OaIO, HAMILTOt
u COUNTY, SS.-Superior Court of Cincinnati.-
Swift, Hugh W; Hughes and Wilson T, Drake, pare
He5s eG FS.i ss EyShs Co. plaintiffs vs. Robert HeWSon
com (dTawers)i Horace D. Ghigmsn' George GiIiis-
pie, John L; GuiaingeE and William D, ChipmAn,
L. Brown and John L. Guisnger, partners a. Gut
singer Brown Undorsersl
Guisipger and William L. Brown are hereby noti-
fed that on the 18th day of March, A. D. 1861 the
therein the effect aud demand of hch is to recoVeE
and interest from February l. 1861 on drsiI oi
said defendants for said sum, dated Cincinnati De.
that William b. Williams and Samuel v. Ried, part
pers as Williams Ried, and Thomas 3 Smith,
an order Of attachment has been issued In said ao-
tion and levied upon the following described prem
All that certain lot or parcel OF ground situated
n Oincinnati, commencing forty nine (49) feet from
streets, and running thence southerly along the lin
Of J9hn.st sixty one feet, and the same width
rni twardly at right angles sixty .one feet thence
sng ht angles seventy feet, to the place OF begin
Also, that lot of ground situated in the City Of
Cinci9nsti, County of Hamilton, Ohio, the nsrtk
John-street, commencing at a point on the north
side q sil tn street, two hundred and sixty sTe
nj raj at fha fufd ~
lot now or 6erotofore held By samuel B. Keys a. a.
Trustee; thence running east twenty one (2D feet
back to George street, on line parallel to john
The said defendants are renuired TO answer or ds.
mur to said petition on or before the 2Sth day Of
December; A d 1861, otherwise Judgment will Be
1 saS en a. against them and said attached property
oosi.fWy Nj. W TILDgN for Plaintias.
VENHE STATE OF OHIO, HAMILTON
u COUNTY, sS,-The Superior Court of Cinein.
Hughs and Wilson T. Drake, Psftnors, Ss I Evans 4
Co., PLAINTIFF, versus Warrington Butcher and
fendsnts, and Anthony Bullock and Morris Drum
Garnishees The said defendants, Butcher i BROTH.
D. 1861, the said plaintfs fled their petition n
said Court, alleging therein that, on the 27th day
certain bill Of exchange for the sum OF IS COO and
ipdoibed and directed the same TO the said Butcher
fbst Sts1 o5 whom 3 the same was duly accepted
q the said Butcher Brother, the same was duly
SSSsS IN Si Stie tbss a. ihsiT ssnhnI
~ tis; a. from dSfenaSnts on said dI9ft the said
SaS 3 ShS interest sTs sdsa S% asy and The
Drum and Anthony Bullock have been served az
gaInishees In said action. Defendant are required
70 plead, answer or demur 10 said petition, on or
bet.re the 2lst day Of December, A d. 1851 other
wise, Judgment viii Be rendered against them aEd
the property or credits Of the said Butcher q
Brother in the possession or coz troll OF the Eaid
DS 70 hS BsEp1t 1 psS Ass