Cleveland morning leader. [volume] (Cleveland [Ohio]) 1854-1865, 1862-02-19
Simeon Jennings
[ In the Court Of Common
Pleas Ouyahoga County.
) DEFENDANTS,

vs.. In the Court Of Common
Frederick W. Walker Pleas, Ouyahoga County.
VENHE SAID DEFENDANTS,
Frederick W. Walker and George walker,
y 4OSS tSat the 1S paa iahs 81 eoS IS
has sled his petition In said Court Of Common
1855 said Frederick W. walker executed md deliv1
cred TO him his PromissOry note for y2 100, payable
rate Of ten per cent. per snnum payable annually,
cOmmenGtng November IS, 1883, and with interest
on the interest ct ten per cent. per snnum, with
interest remaining unpaid more than six months
the whole principal she ud bfeOme due at the option
Of the plaintiffs and that ell Of the interest which
has accrued said Hete remains unpaid, except the
sum of 81 200, which has been paid
Tho petition further alleges that to the pay
ment Of said note, said Frederick W. Walker, on
November 18th, 1853 executed and delivered to said
tracts parcels Of land all situate In the toFnship
Of Olmsted, Ouyahoga county and state Of Ohio,
known and bounded as follows, to wit;
Parcel l. Being part Of the Walter King tract,
called, bounded north by tract two Gin said town
ship) east by tract OF two hundred acres conveyed
to sussnnah Kellogg, south BY the the south line Of
the walter hing tract and westerly BY the west
under the name Of unknown oW1ersi In q partition
made by the Court Of COmmen Pleas Of UuyahOga
Ogunty, in 1888 1888, under petition presen ted
BY Henry l. and Albert King, containing about one
hundred and twenty four acres.
Parcel q A part Of the Wal ter King tract bounded
north by tract number twl 8east by the north and
south road leading throuR the ceDter Of Olmsted,
south BY the south line the Walter King traeI,
aud west by line paral with said north and south
road and so far WesttTi therefr0m as 10 embrace
two hundred acres ofland, excepting thersfrom fifty
acres Of land, bOundsd as follows; North BY tract
No two, east by said north and south road, south
by the south line OF the alter King tract ana west
by a no parallel with said north and south road
and so far westerly therefrom as 70 embrace nifty
Parcel 3. The east half of the Walter King tract,
bounded as follows, the north by land formerly
owned by L. P. Usher, on the east by the Columbia
road, on the south by land formerly owned BY James
Kali lauu and IN he mat Inv nd
road leading through the center Of Ulmsted.
Parcel 4. Twenty five acres Of land conveyed By
1884 being the north half Of fifty acres, bounded
north by the north line Of the Howard and Williams
tract, east BY lire parallel with the east line OF the
| Howard and Williams tract and SO far west as to
| include between said Hues one hundred and hfty
acres, south by the south line Of the Howard and
Williams tract, and west BY line parallel with the
east boundary, and SO far west as to embrace MY
acres, the south line of this tract being the east
and west line through the center Of the tract con
Veyed as above.
Parcel 8. The whole of lot number fourteen and
ten acres of the west end Of lot number fifteen, in
! tract number two, in said tOgnship, bounded west,
north and south BY the lot lines and esst By line
parallel with the west line Of lot number fifteen,
containing one hundred and ten acres Of land, and
was decided to George O. Knight BY E. P. Usher and
/ wife, March, 1855.
Parcel 6. The west half of fifty ecrss Of land con.
veyed to Cyrus Friend BY Noah Thomas and
of Howard Williams tract, west BY the west line
o q lot OF two hundred acres conveyed to stephen
Jopes by John Williams and John Howard By ID siT
attorney, b. ". Cowless Sov. l2 1884, south By an
ana west iRe through the centre Of said tract
and east by line parallel with the west line 30 far
/ from IL as 10 inclose just twenty five acres
Parcel Z. One hundred acres Of land on the east
part Of the two hul!dred acres apaEteo to Howard
Willsns in the right OF John " ashington, and De.
scribed in partition by or=r Of the Court Of
/ Common Pleas CT said county Of CuyRhOga, A. D.
1921, bounded east By Inc at right angles with the
north line OF SAID tract and 90 lar west Of the 90
lumba road as to leave just fifty acres between Eaid
lire and the west line OF said road, north BY the
north line Of s1id tract, south by east and west
line through the eentrs OF said tract and est ~
line parallel with the line and far from It as
to include Just two hundred acres, being the same
/ land conveyed by Nathan Aoker and wife to Jasper
Kefser and By Jasper keiser 70 George o. Knight
Parcel .. A part Of the Walter King tract, bound
ed north by tract number two, esBt by the north
and south road leading through the centre Of Ohm
/ sted, south by The south line Of the waiter King
tract, and west by line parallel with said north
and south read, and far westerly thsrsfrom as 20
embrace 6fty sores. -.
Parcel 9. In lots number TO- 49, SO and 30 IN the
village of Olmsted Falls.
Parcel TO- Part Of lot number fifteen In tract num-
Der tWo1 IN said township pounded a3 L0iioEs, 70
wit: north by Hamlln street, essterly By the Usher
road, and westerly By the eastery line o. the OsneT
/ farm.
Ihe petition further rspresents that sala Jennings
has declared his option that because Of the interest
on said note remaining in arrear more than SIX
months, the principal has become due, and prays
that said premises may be soldto pay said note
principal and interest.
The petition further represents that said Freder.
| lex slker having neglected 70 pay the taxes On
January, 1852, purchased them &C tax SALE paying
ThS peii4ion slso represents that said George
Walker claims now to own said premises by pur-
chase from said Frederick Walker, made February
The petition prays an order fer the sale Of said
pi emises pay said note, principal and interest,"
and the amount paid for the premises at said tax
/ sale, and interest and penalty thereon.
The defendants are required TO answer said Psti-
''.- = -. Ii. aEIsWoLD, Atty for Plaintiff