New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-01-08

no signitcapcy Of he events OF - ,,s,;no honr
Rliisb mai-ofwar bears % o. s5or,s Of IN.
land. tlere 10 be received =, ,,onrh and with
bouts Of exul'aicu az ,a,,4yrs ard heroes, aud
With the eus'oes % g pc,ple Of Ergla' d, am nc
Re proteees OF ~ Ministers, the very meI', who
,n' for the rae ssi of Cant. Wilkes, and the s'il
more rss' -D5orscment of the Aduims'ralo" .,.,n
he cor 1tsy, wouid six weeks ago nave ~;
l'1e'r handed from private ship N our l;,I
az re,,eis and refugees Al Europe e'h'ef ~" go,
their Names an Europe viii use W " y. , to !
honor: and vet Won sirIt ndered item a." NV', ~
escape tha recognition ty England OF the 'oa.eleier
States and vorr Secretary OF Sue II" a.,
resignation or stole philosophy, calmly 'elp.e9
the eilectual check upon ano Wa'uS lloI'. .'''"
the insrrrertion A. well RS the comparative o''hn'
,ortance when weighed dispaseionately, o. the per
snns concerned. hapuily enable the Admni-lFii'n
after six weeks OF experiment, q eheerinV h"y'',0
thou, and thus 10 remove tins Z terfm2 can" O.'''
Sir eive ne leave to ~ that the moment they
Mason ard Siidel stepped upon The deck ~ u hIi'-
;sb msu-oJ Sar your prisoners Of state. WHOM t.e
other day you woud have consigned 10 Icons ceh''
became Indeed the Enyoye and I'm as iJoi' O. i"
racoo uized independent State; and predict mere 'o
day in sIiie of tins deep national huNniitlph, 81
perhaps because OF II aud in spite TOO, % me
surrender, without protest, Of the Monroe doctil1e
Tor 40 wears the cherished and proud polcy 1 u1's
Government in ess than three months yon WIZ " ~
Nyar with GreIt Britain, or else, III the med.'ini'
will have tamcly submitted 10 the reecgnin0h 81
the Contede,aie States and the breaking up Of tne
blockade; and if AZ war then with hearts uhstiuns
aud hands unnerved by this very surrender IVuI.
agel Corrueel Courage Sir, IL the trst ara ves'
O. peace-lnakers. know well, OF course, OH, '''
like all other similar predictions ior some years
us.i IN regard 10 our pnbi, allrs, You VIII tIeat
/ his one also with ecoiliug and incrednIty, nn''
n.verthele.s mi il on record here to-day. . me
,rudent man fOIseeth the evil and mdeth hiniseh'
cat lhe simple pass and ere punished.
/ Mr. HUiCHINS rep, Ohio co. graduated the
courtry and the House that his colleague, VINO mere
iofore had been on the peace establishment, was
nov on the wal es adjustment
Mr.. YALLANpIGHAM, interruTtIng, remai Eeo'
" On the war path. 49,
/ Nr. UITCHINS. resuming said he did not pro-
uose 20 discuss wr-iher the surrender OF Mason ana
SGdel was proper. lie wished very briefly to com
nent o. tie attitude of his colleague on TINS snd
other anestons connected with the welfare OF the
country.
/ Mr.. NALLANDlGHAM rose to point Of order
lie had no DOUBT he would have the privilege OF re-
plying to his colleague, and he thoognt, without
/ ,iLIty be would be able 10 take care Oi himself
But he could not see how bis position on other SUD-
iects was pertinent TO that now before the House
| The question Of suirendeing mp Mason ana sideh
| bad nothing TO do with The posion u Element L.
Nallantlghain
The STEAMER requested Mr.. Hutchins 10 con'ine
himself 10 the question before the iionse.
Mr. IUTCHlNS, rsumng. ssid-iie understood
his colleagues IOsiion 10 be, that SINCE the unior
inmate rebellion broke ont he was against coercion
and in favor of Ieace. lie did not understand why
il Was his colleague was so warllke against England
and not against the rebels, who were seeking 70
overthrow the Government Ii was rel orted tilat
- much was bis colleague in favor OF pence, tIHt ne
n al asserted that before any citizens OF ms dlstlt
should leave Ohio TO fight against ,he South they
should march over hs dead body.
Mr.. VAILANDIGHAM asked did not BIZ
colleague lInt,hinsl know that he had denounced
the settlement III one be never made, either here or
elseyyterel Why did bis colleague pick up and
utter the hoa'ng ISLANDERS Of the ist six months
Mr.. HI rCHINS responded that be must accept
the denial but he thought from the policy advocated
! by bis colleague he WIFI justified. IN believing his
colleague occupied some"nat INC PosiAoh DO nao
assigled him.
! Mr.. KELLOGG rep, H., rising toa point OF
order seid that this controversy WAS Irrelevant 70
the subject before the House.
/ The SPEAKER overruled the point, but suggested
to the gentleman QIutchinsl that he would avoid
personalities.
Mr.. lit rCHINS, resuu ing, ssid thai If lie col
iea.ue would read an sriicle which recently np-
peired IN rte R,cdmoAd ErGmner, he would hnd
that war with England was what the rebels desire
Tie portion Of hs colleague on this and other qnes
Tons was liable 20 ibe suspicion thst his bclhsercn
course toward England might tend 10 benefit The re-
btOue Ssales. Iiis colleague was against coercion
in case, but ia favor Oh war in tic osher. ihs
would stand until his coll ague ritli satisfactorily
explain.
/ Mr. VALLANDIGHAM-This is bat another Of
the same Clsss OF insults.
Nj. HCTCIiINS said that he may have mis-
understood his colleague At all events, when and
where bad his colleague, from the commencement OF
this rebellion, ever voted for meaeae tending TO
-ubdue il, and 10 reesitLlish the authority Of the
United States The records Of this House scarcely
show vote or speech Of his colleague, IN which he
ud not oppose the ever since lie commencement.
lie believed that fair statement OF the position
Of biz colleague. And now, lie would have beId %,
IN Mason and Sdell in order that n might result IN
war with Great Britain for he benefit OF the rebels.
/ Mr.. THOMAS Union, Mas said Til qne' lion
involved points Of law and some uleety. III was too
much 10 assume that this country could take another
war Oh ia hands, and we must therefore wait Bot
we are not called 10 SAY that the deDand Of In
glnnd was manly and Ilst. IL was unnianly aud u.-
lust. He denied that 10 capturing Mason a.d shdel
an insult 10 the British ilg and violation Oi inter-
national law was intended, and argued that We lid 4
"a right ~ DO what done on thai OCCASION. When
The whole ma ter stall be calmly and thoroughly
COZ -dered he weight Of the argument % tie civil
lied world would be with u.s. We have Lad buf the
fist impressions, aud moi the sober, second thought.
Tie question the other SIDE it not What the rule
H. bit whfi the rule should be- II Will be seen aud
felt that 40 wrong waa done 10 England, and no IN
suit offered 10 her dag, ~ nom intended. oar
idiiiups II any. have leaned to ylitles side and
no departure from the rigor OF TIE international
law by Cant. Wilkes WAS from motives of humanity
ing land has done 10 us " RueV0ur wrong ia mailing
IL demand fOr Mason and Nliici u was iusol,nl IN
spit and unjust England II tiea,ufine 10 hcrst Ii
wrath against he d ~ OF wrath. She hds ,acrd H.
il, Leaiis 81 people a deep sehee OF wrong ~ q
Tine when cannot res Ond Bni W shall be
waiting through, The watches Of The nigh - si.Ike
he blow Of righteous rcirihuiiOn.
Mf- NlENEN> rep, Pa moved the prev ous
ques'iou under The operation Of which the do i-
mfui- wee referred 10 tie oIuiGitlec on EcreI5n
tillli-.
The n1nse went into Coinniiee OIL tie bill To- ID,