, 1862-10-11

Interesting Cases in the Recorders C,uYf-Report
Of the Grand Jury-turious Estate Case-
Passing Counterfeit Cots.

~
HIM y1o,,oe D~v,n,,o,,d ~, ~ o..
- ~ ""s'<oa -. ~ e1a..-
ec's tepoIa heletolole ateo no" connrmed. |
No. 291-kimbark vs.. 1ngersolI; report of |
receiver confirmed Nos 5s- 50c and re3
asee,,,. s.1 n,..,s a.. asos.. ," ' -.s@ ~,
uelau1'' anu e1elA ~ aesess oa1nases' NO.
5sl-de3ault and Judgment On scita, to lore |
close; referred TO clerk.
n NJ 90 non,a,e ~ ~. r,.n,
IL 10 ooo"Uaole4h Fs. 1ne cnlcago and !
Rock Island railroad company. Tie argu-
mtnts were concluded at nom xesterdav m
49,. ..o+;nx ~. o-- 49,, ..I ~
- ~ Ano.on w n1" 14ai' anu 'ae eoof' ne1o
Ice matter under adVasement-
In Nos I'll, .1T3, and .0l, known as the I
Rhode Island f.entra1 R,nt caeas ,rx,r,,ax+s
- ~, ~@N~7' "u.ots'
on Liz Aaosaoa 'ot ne" tt1als ATE no" penang;
they will be concluded to-day.
Reports Of each of tile cases referred tn |
ahore having heretofore snneared in tho T,I.
- =. ...-s -@~- @ple.e14 A'1 .'e A"'e
NCSE, IL Is unnecessary 10 reproduce them.
SrrEkloR CorRT-R:torc Hon. Tan Il. Higgins. |
No. 77O-Notion that similita he stricien |
from f1ae sns+,i,ad sad .,o+,o., - c..;,,a
.oA. AA~s, 01sssAsa' 'Ae .Ao.on soe'tlAe
denim &c IRON tles, oVerTuicd. No tH-Di-
versy and buchanan, defendants, move to
4s!eno a pleaol9ss oy st1lklnS OUT name OF
Diversy, sustained; leave for Diyersy to plead
~! ~ thie - morning. no. 49, era1ct 10, p'a!n.
III: Us1snaant moSes aor ne" tnai. ~ 6ol
ana ;1'9 MoLlon a ioF M ne" tiia % plalntli1 No.
~ 5N4s-!nogt1ent ~ 1or plamlli peI stipulation
~ .oo-Moti9n lo5 ne" l'4al "atnafa~n, and
loqg1neilt n: iol aeleouans.
JuuEG niss1's ~as ensascd az aa5 yester-
o
u sety gIeat interest 70 ~ pelsoas VINO nave
occasion 10 hny or Scn property. We annex
nI1el suHtUa'3 ot tne nalo poluts
ha vs. ana Gath%an
1ns,nsse lug nn @;or st-at asSt ~ m.1 aolng
adn &c ~ ohstat ~ s. hne y, Some ;l4e ago
ta auG .;.1n an =. aos.As. ~ .uu1 ~ ninoeaS 81
t.e.a e u.G W oei,a anSu .e ~ y . Ans
.nes "a 'e t,. Nv p1ssssao9
;th - LIZ ~ pnt ~. ~ i9ded ana
ae .tte1@o.s a ~.ov t.t ~. ~
fhtcting the title to the property had been
omitted from the abstract, and chancery
suit BECAME necessary to supply such omts-
put to = large expense, and nov eues Gree5-
| bauu, and Guthman for dam opcs. their error
! plaintiff claims having been tie sole cause Of
he trouble and expendiiure, EarIy in The
case question arose as to whether or not 40 DE- DE-
third narty. The abstract having a. ~ hsr.,
stated, been furnished 10 Wn6ett The % ~.
5ot Fot 1he fat!e W. ~ agang
n cnnscnusnne ~ .hs @ s;assssaa nosen'nM ~
Goo51;ch snd 1he fact ~ 4hat as Tndgs H; e. yaaEe
| errared n fha f-i,1 ~ . c.-sa e 9.ne -
o11c that The Conrf vii q, p ;onn :. n.y. Pfoo'
Rrrnpnrn7s En1,rTuRE,. -" ~ a. .7@1g I. .o~oaS"
u;.onMThe e,snd inIy vestera.T .1 sf,.rno., H. o.
| tnnnS !. +,-,a IN sr.fnet2 1laoon 9
bis associates 1or kee1,inr rsmhitn% hnnss oaa
! The iury haFipg completed sil The 6ns;ness
| tar! n.., n-S - I:.rn.s - taI ouSuese
VIII thsnEs The nnmhes "f tr;,e III XII. nr.; fonnd
| ~ th;s fcrr, Ia - ~A -A1s oAA' A"1"1
| 4 neE csse having rome m After thn d,s.
| c1,arre 0f fha inv Thioh raox,-od f--o1f.s.
action snects s 9e,n;rs e. o. aa ,sae