, 1862-03-31

had nnde loan Of sixty Thousand dollars,
Of party FROM the, East, With bring
ing which about Mr. Carver had some CON
neetlop: The deposition; Of Mathew e Latin !,
sold sc, 900 worth Of bondsto BE. Carver at
par. and took his check for $50 900 In part pay,
which check, i1ldorsed by HIMSELF Was paid :
to defendant as cash and constituted the loan
spoken Of. George D. Woodwerth, book
Keeper: Of Mr. Link, testified to the making
entry Of the credit Of scr, 900 by him. # was
shown that Link drew checks upon the Marine
~ Bank; in the months of May y,rjnne and July.
and q part Of August, to defray the expense ot
erecting his buildings, to the nmount OF about
having been discounted by tie Bank IN Au-
gust, 1857, and that early in August two checks
for 81, IT'S were thrown ont hY the Bank for
want Of funds. The plaintiils then produced
IN Court, being notified to do go, their lndl.
his deposits ind checks. This shoW wed two
entries Of credits, the first being the proceeds
of the discounted acceptance already spoken
.of, and next and last, credit Of S45,000, On
the 18th Of August, near four months alter the
making Of the alleged deposit Of 500. .M
ever made with the Bank by Link than that of
August Is Of SIS, 900, toshis knowledge, but
that Mr. Carver directed him to honor Mr.
Links d1afts to the amount Of $4,000, Egi-
dence vas given to show that Link had ad-
mitted By his conduct in various WaJs that
!; he was indebted to the Bank that he had
been sued on the IS COO acceptance and sub
mltted to q Judgment upon it, and that the
Bank had paid his checks and drafts to the
amount of $50, 900. It was commanded on the
mart Of the Bank that the only deposit ever
made By Link Vas the 81, 600 On the 18th Of
August, 1857, and that whateyer else existed
was private arrangement with Carver, and
not Eifh the Bank and that If Mr. Carver had
not deposited the full amount Of sec, 600 for
him he must look to Carver and not to the
Bank.
The defense insisted TINT the Bank WIS
elargab1e with the whole SUN Of $50, 600 LEFT
for deposit By defendant with the officers Of
the Bank, which they contended was proved
BY the evidence to have been the amount ut
the deposits, although that sum may not have
found its way to the Bank or upon its books.
The jury could not agree and we're discharged.
| Of the case in October, 1860. ]. Y. LeMoyne
| for the Bank. Arthur ". Wiudctt for the de,
| fendant.
l. EErTED STATES CIRCUIT CoURT-Bejo7s JuGgt
I R.unlmond- 4s11, Chaneery. 7. P. Case Is
as as saeal as ct sa 4 aIs sRRss9n @ 4
nase John VI + snss St s i Va NJ
Holds etal; q mosien eopplaiaant's solicitor, and
defendants are necessary and material to the rights
Of complaiNante it fs ordered that answer be flei
By 9efsndanta ut o1 cause must be ahoWn TO The con
ssie{so1 iPjaastiea : 5ssHs ssaIast % dsisndsats
Ko n na4ysa e
al ys Geo. r. Lee ct al: to answer; defendants
/ time extended one week.
Koz; 2so and s5s Admiralty; dismissed by Ii
Nos. 6s6 and 2a9LDiamissed at plaintiffs costs
CIRCUIT CouET OF CooK CoUErF-Betore Ja1g
10 answer as to Loan 4 Trust Company to ez
No. s ssHchaf5es7F fz @ ct al vs.. E. J. Hopzor
pSoa No E.
ruled, and leave to defendant to 80
cSsnceTr nFs1 Il aarand Ts s. Fsl% Roods as
demurrer to bill sustained, whereupon complain
ant aaka leave to amend the bill by IN offer to pa
Morris v. Malhiot e confession. On motion {
cause BY changing name of defendant to I'll Le
eeod,7c1@No. 7iLazsrus stine Ts banE{ei ste11
berg ct al; motion OF plaintiff to, reinstatc thl
Ts Isaac Spear; time to file bill Of exceptions e,
tended until first day Of next term. No 313-Joh
3. King vs. David o. Strong ct al verdict for pai,
defendant
The Grand Jury appeared in open Court
10 present. made presentment Of the 70
lowing indictments;
The people Of the State Of Illinois vs. job
a. Cook ct al and J. Brown; Indictment II
manslaughter. Same Us. John Garrits
and Vim, Gibbons Indictment for murde
The Grand Jury were discharged.
From the Union Soldiers ut Cam
Douglas.
CAMP DOUGLAS, March %, 1862
Editors Tribune;
From the report Of the Visiting Committc
published in this mornings papers, the eli
zens Of Chicago, as well as yourselves, may /
/ led to infer that my former communicate
was untrue. I have only to request you aI
them to inquire Of any Union officer or sc
} dier, stationed at camp, as to whether tht
} ever Eaw or heard Of IN article named in Il
schedule, save one-the cough Eyrup-beiI
given to Union soldier. have visited eve
company in camp this morning, and cam
find one who has received an article; but q
, | say they were informed the stuff WIS sent I
, ! for prisoners, exclusively.
Charge nothing to account Of Union Sc
diers which they do not receive. -.
-i