The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1862-03-07
LEGAL RBPORTs-rnURSDAY.
UeIled slnt~ CIrcuIt Csurt

Ccnricted Of M1nsldYgI'cy. - The United
states rg GHruidn. -Iue prisoner Wa charged
with the homicide - a seaman ON bard the snip
Magnolia, Ivy striking him over the neal with be
laying pin. The use WA stated ia tie SIS "
Tou4day
Atetiic, o. suit. n man,!a'sut.r was now rem
derel, and the tlis'aur commute . -cnieuce.
CL1rge Of .pat,br-Tis third Silges -,
H,urg Huri,us.- tus p'isrer IN U.s. -" IL
,Lat,d ~th t.s mu. Ter " Csita.l Adams q. We
snip Lar.t ser, 8 ptcuutr 90, l,n' ".i c thH 7H'p
wss nn..t ns ne ie,uri veg '.H'. Load 10 to ials
IT,. c. p,siu $50 i,ud i,irgip N'. be,th, v!tH
urtsI y,urd ii MS lesd. vLIr. sp'yA',d g. I'VE
bee, 30 oie',d With an axe. rie V'''a DIED au'r'-
Ia legged ,hN there bal been a l.H IVY b..
tvg' % Capt, q The piis"nef, " g b, - st'e-
A.i u't.t ,s-r, . O. mig q before The M -i'' snt
t'Is chiin'd nat TIE psi'onet ~ s,Ilrlhg i-.
J,tti tst % , Ynlmittll the Sc, an1 at t.e
aIoa Wa- i,1ni b. bic = secession.
IL dt'tuoo b. q u t1,te is n'uilg T. CONNECT
Nr ~ u 81 10 the cit1to. Toe case IS ~ On.
III 6wriDy = ne r. 4. H,gsm il.-Thb
prtrit Aunturf u1, CONS mt tat u1's
prn. cIut ,estt ti 1ssisst a. t'e dm-n ,n,s in
. b. csc. 49,. tie ,t,er W. made acc ir1inglY.
l. Vii Toe rerltuh' r,d tAat 10 was ale gsd Tat tho
bot Va, luru,d n olisin the insursn q on her.
tn. d,i-udaris are therefore discharsed.
snprem. Court
The Riri RaJ6cr Casc-GruiGm y. A6Jot'
-. hs AMERICAN Hdri Rubber CoWpduy.- The
p,,rt n a IA ta.. is TIE trucipa, aud ~ prleL,r
s,o khuldsr in Tie American II ard RuObtr mp any
Co the extent Of shout $40 1000.
The lire tors ~ the Company made . s.s ~ the
patent tights If the concern, anil this action WA
brought o. obtain Judgment setting aside such
sale. L ,nn the trial, the Court al udlre that the
sac was fraudulent, and II WA, {, ircgOre, set
asiie.
The parties then Agreei to a decree tina, the case
should be referred g. Judge Bronson " r'pIrt the
value Il the property, and th 1t III was worth mora
than $40 COO ttne price a. watch Wa sldl thon
the Plaintiff should be- entitled 10 take IL back, on
rsfunuing the price nut, n II worth less a. an
that sum, the III nudN vast waive his right. As
Judge ons)n's e. gAgencun a. Counsel " the
C,rporatn prevented him FROM accepting the ap.
puintm' nj - ref rec, apply alton ~ nlw male g.
substitute ano l'r patty ~ aCt h. tlN cap tctty.
Ah'r toms discussion a. b. the pc-son 10 lo
nam the Court took the papers and reserved lie.
Cis.on.
The Cheerry church case Coming p hs Eat
| The Pcople ~ NE relation 0f Hdrrey ant 0ih'r,
| rs Hart & others This clas, when has On
scofoH # times reported within the past year aud
| hhf nov cane On for trial At the ,rcui', on H.
| merib The iesti m - be decided, II vii. he re.
memhcred. Is whether the REALTORS the res luli.
ents were elected Trustees %, the Chu oh ~ thc
PuritAns.
| Toe dtfendants or respondents, new OF 'c,ei o.
! eoing To trial, aleyins that tho no longer in
vnlyed any positive question, AZ the ra'Ntori had
Withdrawn FROM the ,cisty The pres sute 4
| no live issues, ami there va. uece.-tv for Try.
ing II, The REALTORS, however, insisted upon their
rghttn have thJ validity ~ tle olc3 uou tested 10y
the verdict Of a Jury.
The Cout reAerved iCri'iuu a. tie right OF
/ propfeiy VI tying the issue u fact.
United States opauaissioner's ON 80.
! tUcgef TpLuf,r T,itiBO -Ths fFsifs} g,t,.