New-York daily tribune., 1862-11-07
TaE EMANCIPATION PROCLau.
TION ABROAD.

The Courier des Eiets Cnis of ,ssterdsv p.
tcrs to an article on our war by the Pripc. A.
Joinye, contained in the Rcrue d.s H..
blondes oct. l5), at the close of which N.
Prince speaks as follows Of proclanation A.
! Emancipation:
| II the strugls between the two sect;on, ma, T.
'hoald be proongedif tie ISOLATION q their great cons
character may spring from Urged on by The
fic neessfscs ~ ne arBsgLs the Fsders 0oysruuent
proclaim tae sooon oi s. avery .ad may even BE- mpeiS
inx tile slaves against their msasrs But such me.su,.
epG, ,.s = Jea;sys q si1ses ard oa,1a, woudbss
presbfs dV'.ions in he bosom II tho AOrAv Na,u n,
more beneficial than injurioos 70 the Secession cause
The Courier recommends this passage to Tia
admirers of the Emancipation Proclamation.
since it comes from pen which caunot bs
suspected by them." The E1prss hasteus to
copy the article of tho Courier, and accon,ua.
MES it with the remark Even the bst
friends of the United States condemn il the
Emancipation Procamatonl aud almost with.
out exception"
As regards the sentiments Of the Prince oi
Joinvc, we feel hardly authorized to form aa
opinion Of them from the above detached
passage without having read the entire articJs.
Tho passage Itself, detached from its connee.
ton with the whole, seems to express more
what the Prince thinks must be the necessary
aud stern consequences OF a continuance Of tas
shareholders rebellion than his own views
upon the abolition of Slavery. and the best
course to pursue with regard to It, Some
time ago, the Opinion Noti0EGle, in similar
language, referred 10 tho terrible Consequences
which Proclamation OF Emancipation might
that the Opinion Nationaie, like other papers
friendly 10 the United States. would DO found
among the warm supporters OF al Emsncpa-
ton Proclamation, The Herald FASTENED to
Of our prediction. In this case the words,
however, were too plain to need any further
comnent, and we therefore deemed il superauOas
to reply tn Ide Herald. As soon as TIE Enanoi.
was. as we had predicted, warmly iHdorsed by
tie OIini5n NGii0naie. The following passage.
found ia its number of October i6 and CON.
menti9g on the statements of the Richmond
papers that " the black flag is to be raised"
&c. explains It's views:
lgaf Gd they oap.ct, We have all s,org predicted ths
very s,e ( .hng' which uog exist. he s'avsho dsu
have enjoyed long -uougr tie advantages OF ges crime
against han auy they have io's snegsh i'e9 ~ :III
men yssnes 0icdl. at .asf csS her v9rs mat
be ,one v" tond hsve preferred p,aeriu solution ofs
slavery Gur.3u but the rssans o. the thsIasovs
have drawn sword h.. Lincoln has hsstsed eBg bst
is s hgs Is,d ma se'fr " hs cay on ff. ae bSsa
re,iy .ee. all 1t has to do to prevent t0 ns
the ,!sv-. its-f'
The words Of the Prince of J0nyiIls DO nOt
fully admit of this Interpretation. Bu. what
ever tseir meaning may be- No need not take
back line o; what we have said IN forner
articles on the effects which the Proclamation
would have in Europe The great organs Of
liberal aal democratic progress Throughout
Europe--the Gsrbaldis. Victor Hugos, aud Giner
leaders Of European deuOcTacy-haye spoken oa
II. Though sOme have regretted the mora
military than moral tenor Of the Proclamation.
not one democratic leader or democratic paper
has spoken against it, while the great ma
jori,y OF them have heartily recommended it.
As to this remark OF The E1press, that
- Even the best friends of the United States
condemn il, and almost without exception"
l. ia almost incredible that an American paper,
in whose own flies some OF the opinions Of foreign
papers arc ON record, should venture su a:.er.
ton which conyicts il either of stupen3oss
ignorance, Or of fixed determination to persist
IN ialsehOod. Let us briefly recaptulate the facts.
Among the daily papers of London, our cause
has been, from the beginning of the war, chiefly
advocated by The DAILY MrS and The Star.
These papers have always opposed the Re'
beion. and expressed hope for the recon'irlc-
tisn OF the Union. On the other hand, 4"
Tlmes Tie Herald The Post, The Ss'ndSs
Rr,icr. Tie Lirerpoo! Post The MarfAfS"
Galrd;aa, anl a number Of others, have no'
omitted 10 heap abuse upon our country, oaf
institutions, our army, our people. lhey ha''
urged us 10 let the South 90. They hrc
cosdel on their own Government, IN the Tren'
affair 10 hostile demonstrations. number
tn,ln have been clamorous for recognition
southern Coniederncy, or even for an armed
Intervention.
Now, which of these papers are in favor ana
which ara against the Emancipation Procianis'
ton We have published the opinions VI
every paper above named. and Tie ErPr'"
has published few of them. We now dey
he Erprsss to show us one article 10 ms o"
or Dai'y Netes. that condemns the Procams'
tion II is Tie Timss, The Herald, th' fo"'
and the other Ant-U Union papers, wh'cn de'
nounce it; and it is The Star, and i@ DaHy
Neins which either hail it with del9h1 OF
least defend ii. As in the capital, 80 It a,'
been with the country press in hnsl'uu.