Daily State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1861-1865, 1862-10-10

IA y. Of course. well known At the South, as IL
j. in Europe. that then i more than probabiI
ity, IN fact little short OF a certainty, that the
great State of New York wiIl be carried this fall
by this conservative party. and that Pennsyls ania
sud New Jersey are both also likely 20 be carried
BY the same party.
With such prospect before the country. u i
utterly impossible but that the rebellion will be
greatly cnmioried by the loud assurances of the
radical press that tte party which IS coming into
power In the great Northern States is disloyal.
So too in foreign countries-it is impossible that
England or France can have respect for gov
eminent 20 fatally divided against itself as this
must be. II the radical newspapers are to be be-
lieved.
Now. every one here knows tia, the accusation
OF disIoyalty i pure falsehood, coined IN the
brains OF certain politicians, who are reckless Of
all things except their shares in the spOils of
political csmpsi9n. The SANDER Of the radicals
i laughed at The conservatives have no thought
of diSuaon di-bonor.
Kno~ing il 20 be such a lalsehood the question
of cs'ur-e arises whether there u not some ulter
OF object beyond mere political success operating
in the minds of the who are thus holding out
/ % rebels and foreign nations an inducement 70
greater exertions against Union We all
know that the radical position against the Union
+ aud Constitution has Oeen steadiastly maintained.
We also know that the Govern has received
is chief support IN the prosecution Of the war
\ from the loyal conservative men. while the radi
/ Gals have been ftful. and sOmefimes arrayed
against the ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS when the
\ Government seemed TO be nearest To the point OF
breaking down entirely. The New York Times
attacked the Administration as utterly nc0m-
petent." Immediately after Pores defeat, and the
Chicago Tribune protested against allowing the
army to win victory under Mcclellan in Mary
/ LAM aft hat no If az led
that Antietam victory and the New York
/ Tribune stated that It saw mo canse Tor con
GRADUATION" in the Maryland victories. What
explanation of this unanimous disoyalty can be
given To reasonable miudsl Is il not suscepti-
bic of explanation only on the theory that the
radical party has desire to play into the hands
of the rebellion, or TO accomplish an object iden
teal with that OF the rebelsi
Why DO they encourage the Southern enemies
Of the Union to persevere in the reyoltl They
know perfectly we'll that If the conservative par
ty shall obtain power this fall I'm the Empire State
and in other States, there is not the slightest dan
ger OF its conserving to a dissolution of the
Union They know that the Union is the grand
object of conservative hopes and labOrs, to which
every conservative man has pledged his life.
They know that IL conservative men carry these
States, Mr. Lincoln will fnd himself sustained as
the constitutional President of the United States
dreamed Of All this these radical slanderers
know perfectly we'll. Ii looks. therefore. very
much as " they desired, by sending false inform
alton 10 the enemy. to encourage them to greater
efforts against the Union. so that when the Pres
ident finds the grand conservative force OF lhe
North sustaining him. and the grand conservative
army of the Union under his command he shall
be met with an increased force by the rebellion,
and the thus prolonged through the winter
lar nd to- fha HON of ui,un nd
Union is forever destroyed. IL can hardly be
possible that these gross falSehoods palpabIe and
known to all men at the North should be so
boldly uttered by radical men, unless this were
the programme of their campaign. They cannot
but be disunonists They do not expect to he
believed at the North; but they do expect to be
believed at the South and abroad tch're people do
moi kno1 that the army is ttoothrds Democratic.
and the national loan nine tenths in tie hands of
conservative citizens.
We do not suggest these suspicious Of a design
to play into the hands of the enemy on the paIt
of the radicals without deliberation We believe
soemnly that the radical party have no desire to
preserve the Union. and that in the prospect of
conservative success this fall, they have deter
minened TO bring about a dissolution of the
| Union, and for that purpose willing 10 sacri-
fee every other consideration. We need not cite
their repeated confessions of hatred TO the Union.
but we read i'm this connection an important
historical fact. shedding muc light on the present
state OF politics. that "a radical meeting in New
York, only three years ago, adopted the follow
ing resolution as an expression OF radical hopes
and wishes:
Whereas. The dissolution of the present i'm
perfect and ngorious Union between the free
and slave States would result in the overthrow of
slavery and the consequent formation of more
perfect and glorious Union, without the incubus
of slavery. therefore,
ResOIred. Thatwe invite free correspondence
with the disunionists of the South in order to de
wise tie most suitable ways and means TO secure
the contamination so devoutly to be wished
The men who adopted this resolution. and have
never recanted, are the supporters OF Wadsworh
for Governor of this State-N. Y. Journal Of
! Commerce.