, 1862-12-14

~
The etiundron in China which attack.sl the
fa,rricr Fos:s. Til: ST., Louis and I.,vant,
t!ie TO- ,n.:r Under Admiral Fnote, tle A.ro Of
Island N.'. II, were also Of the ilcet. a few |!
weeks eihet. ths. sailr.3 from Boston. having
Lsn thoroughly oyerhal,led Mt that port.
4 ElrIsI0a:S EsEEE1.OEs3IENT !;
How The Ens1l.h Pres. II ~sul<E1lr>d-
HNst fOr. Ss1ty Thousand Uoll1 20
nastuat Count dc 1':r%':ay.
A G. se has ;ust come 1T, in couii, ii Lon
don. shic., will explain 70 A.nerit-:ns how ii
is That ccr.ain Journals l., England have been
50 suddenly brought TO recognize the peculiar
merits Of lie s'rycholdc4's rebellion, and
A:ve 20 zca;ouels uplcli it.
The account Of the t1ial lsom Which TIC mike
e4 'r:ci-, ILLS over two columns pf the London
Ism,x, aud il c-ll'l
Char a.t IN. Cora; d n rs'.avead 1E E:i-
l-a1.-Thsr Is tle act,r oy Mi. sesjcarlt G!a-
yer a:sinsl tie etninvut f.c'lcl4 el1rsallau
The stipulated amount for suu=idi.ir,.s' tho
-ucfs,ia9 Chrt'iel:, the -at' ain3 -Aecs ard the
EsraiHy j t,1hM-
The 1at .icunrs Of the plaintiffs demand
wtle rs follow: Al 1;:55.., May ., to 1S5s, o.:
-, Cor Hel:i, lal.ur and n.tt, ials proyii.e1.
aSa laonGE 1'AaA aoE 1Ar AettAdatats aalu slt
their rcasc-t, iu and shout tuc printing end
publishing aud coada, ling . certain nex*pa-
i>ef published in London, c..l,cd the Morning.
Li,v.:c.-, agd III ard shout the printing and
publishing and conducting two other n:w=}aA-
Ie,=. ca]lsts u.e N"Tsi4y ser, and The Es*.ti"y
'siing from tic French language, printing
and publishing certain ar.ie.ts In the
3toyni,y Ch.oahie and the other two
n:ws1o.cst, tor sud on behalf If the Dc
iv,,1;rs, aid Mt tl:clr request; and in and
aonEt The writing. tFan+lstins from. i!lc
ertiain .Hs,er Al ticie- il. the -Hor"iaJ Ch.ons
IT. unt; the ether Two newspapers, for a1l un
af tie defcn.ssnl., for the purpose If
! their beir- Translated in!o the French lar-
! 2i:.:.:, :rd Inserted usnl Isu5:shrd in certain
i o4rnvi new sInpe1:. csllel the jiv,.l7t-, Cog
| :.4.:. .4.ls>t, Ja,ux. aul ot!,er French Erws-
! ,.1T-rs {. inc rate of 500 per rn,nth-Eli,- :
! iN0. Tie plaintiff will aiss, seek to rtcovcE
/ lire raid amount Oh asEsant stated. lie Will
| also stck 10 Eecnicr damages for the 1naS su.
t~.i,'< d in the deprecated .a)ne Ct !hr London
-.C.-. ..-::. .an.e1 III fulfilling th* cnn
| t-sct entered into be,weer himself and the
| dcfcE1ants- The VIII MA is=usd Oh tie I'd
| of Nav last
Thsr;:intii, In support Of his application,
made ttis affidavit:
I /. William Gloyr-. etc. l., swe,y that the
work done, material. i,tDyided. a1,If money
:
| particulars Of demand ln this c.au... wrrc eev.
! craIis t.onc. provided, and paid for th.. de-
| fcuda1ts In EDgla1i0. and tht! the cause oi
! act5cn azpsc wholly IT. Eu:la2l: and That the
Icirndan,: arc SS:a!.A Foreigners, AMI rc-id= out
| Of thc Jurisdiction.
| The dultndants- m1de general acnisa, lit
which the pla:ntiT male TIT: following al5l1'
!! rit, which tells The wtic!e story:
| l. III The years ] ,5i and Nj, persons Tcp1r.
E. n.i=s th,m-elres to INT AZ til: friends ncl
! Employers of The tail def-ut1sn. Ar.rstt
:a:tii'he Marie B;llsul-, tLee Minister 81 ti's
Interior Of t1r FEtacil government. 2Ia VIC
said defendant. liag.stc Atioip|,: Maris
! Esll.uit, GEd we're artiDg With hi: knoTi,
t edge and sanction. and 5y bis Instructions
| As lis agent in -uck negotiations, had Gircl-
interviews with Ile il London. and thcy. so
! acting Oh ae...lf Of :hs' esid defendant. Adol
phle Marie Eilsault. a.l o. tny own behalf
nsutv-!ly .:s1etl tha! thc newspapers called
| respectively the -M1rnIny Gf.p"iels, -Worasaj
Nt4cx ard E.. .s,y son.4.>sf sls1uiu bt caalayct
Is the org III. # TIC r,il d. fc:.1ant, Au:sn-te
A. 1l. EIixnIt, n such Minister 1t thr Interior
Of tie French Eorer1,iuc:t iil EEg}ana-
=, Al divers Zines in the Year lSt; and tht
| ytar le,s proceeded TO fsrs=. aud Ind diy.!.
INTERVIEWS in the year lS1' with tho said de-
1endan., AugEstc 4. II. Bi}lault, Who did the,
acknowledge s;,a r-cn.nize tho authority ant
employment OF tho persons srftercd to iii ult
| III IL Paragraph u tGts HtUHAtI, Ill LIZ
agreement mentioned in the declas alton ami
| particulars Of demand in this action.
| =, ". Albert B3oArl, who YEAS then tho prt
rate eecretEry Ut the esid defendant, Augnsts
=. M. E;llau!t, frequently in tho year 1s'7', a
The request and by n: direction and with To-
~ .Le said defendant, Au-:nste Adoiple Mari.
Billarlf ra*e Instructions TO LIE, verbally
] n.,d in writing. for :he purpose 1T Aav.n:
leading article. written, inserted, and pull
| 1ishcli in the -NJr"ing E'hroaieie newspaper o,
! bcaalf III, md in the said interest Of
said defendant, Au-us1c Aae!;'hc Narit
| Eil':u.t, aud Of t..e sid French sn:crnnle1it
If which the said dtf::d INT a. 4. II. BiilaulE
WAS then. rs hcfurc ule:tlencd, Minister o
lac Interior.
i. II: PERSONS 1eseinbcfore ref:rrei. to
with The sanction ana by the authority. as
t.l:.vr. Of he .s'd defendants, and especial,
If The said defendant Arguste 4. II. Eitllull
vretc aud forwarded nusacrou5 !etse?a an
| communications to nc at ny then re:idenes
iu Casetsd:8h squa:ct and at sha oin9c Of ~
said -N",.ting L'atunide newspaper, In ths
Sttarj- both pl..e.s being lii the county Q
! AiGdlcsex and within the Jurisdiction Of hi!
honorable court. for the ;nrpo5o Of caTyiu:
cut the agreement aereiubciore mentioned
, | and Of aiding, at:t1iEE 1ua sssistin. Tic oh
i.c,s ard views 1f tho said defendant, August
: | j. III. Biliau.t.
5. hare been advised and verify hrliev
that the claims mentioned iu the declaration
| and particulars OF demand in this nctio: ca
: be ssgntly rrovss'and established III an Engli=
court ot law.
On this II. B:isault made another atidar;
| III alteweT:
say that did not employ or authorize an
pcrsn,,s il, 1SJi aud ls.'s o-ss any other t:s,,t
10 agree on my bek;,;f as mentioned in Il.
atEl1fi3 tF The pElirtifT. that ] never heir
fs.rn The plaintiff orany othcr1crson that Ill
! rcssols lLe1e Elm referred 10 ir.d made tn
c ,::rrene1lt mentianr.| tu In The declaration M
particulars nF demand fn this action - st2tc
In the plaintiffs affidavit; tha; 1--we no iI5
WHO the said peisoEs are ant! that If AZ
! srch alleged AGREEMENT iltd been .nt,
: t.onetl IA me Ahnasd have cncrgctica1i
l disavuwed il; that it is possible. though
Go not reeol.sci, thot Il: 1851 NJ Ialhc;
: Eona.d may l,aver. otliciously given
: the plaintiff, az to the agents II othtr foreig
I newspapers. some Indications for his neRsP
pcrs wlieh the platai5!l was i.ceSsa:.s1v ~
| 3--t--st~---f,'-ti-*sh ~ .sto tcf 7lcc ot y.
fseuch government. of Which l. w:1s = mcr
: ter; bui ncItler !, nor TIC said Albert Doual
. | ever heard of any a11ceiucut rs alleged /
q the plaintiff; thai have no knowledge til
5 any }efsoDa hare written md forwarded 10 II
plailtitf numerous le1teis and communication
c h, the plaintiff, for The pu
: pose Of Carrying out thu usrse1ae
1 and ri nidia., aud abctting, and aasis;ing II
a objects aud Tsews rs stat:d in tho l,iainiid
t sftidarit, and ] hare never authorized OF san
T..