The Cadiz Democratic sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1854-1864, 1862-09-24

Bingham does, kheh / lail 10 see II. nheh
the NEGRO rises 10 the dignity ola freeman,
what more can be desire2 Yet nopBe would
expect me tb totes for Garrison. And what
i the differences between them on this sub
iIect2 Garrison Claims TO belong 70 the Gar
risontAn Abolitionists, Bingham claims to
belong TO the Republicans. Yet both meu
have the same hith, demand for the negro
the same things, and support the same duo
trines.
President Lincoln clearly repudiates the
whole Of Bingham's negro dignity doctrine.
4ih. Mr.. Bingham insists that eleven
States baye lost their existence as States by
reason ofthe rebellion, a doctrine terrible IN
the extreme. IfBingham Is right our Gov
ternment 10 destroyed, and We are not a Gov
eminent Of "a States, but Of 80 only. This
administration has very properly ali the time
insisted that It is not in the power OF the
rebels to destroy the Government to sever
the States, or TO take State out OF the un-
ion.--that those rebels arc refractory and en-
deavoring to do the very thing Bingham
claims they have done, and that the GoveIn
Fment Is endeavoring TO whip them into obe-
Idience as States, and not as Territories,
&C cenouered Provinces, or anything else, Ar
bingham, on the contrary, insists that IN all
this the Administration IS mistaken and
wrong. In his speech in congress on the 18th
of March, he said: "a .S.... /
"Now, sir, wish to say that not one OF
1.-The eleven rebel States is to day q State in
the Unionp % fessg ussd1J.G, g,oLI
And, agair, in the same speech he said:
"Who. in the name Of heaven, wants the
cotton States IN the Union or many other
! place than the State ofperdhion,i II they are
J only to be in the Union on condition that,
from day to day, from generation TO genera
/ tion. and rom age TO age, slavery, this new
eivilizer ofths children of Dahomey, shall
sS Thus he declares hiusslfopposed to the
re.establishment Of peace, unless slavery
shall bs abolished. ~ ,.f - ,,ey..st .8.
: 9th. Mr.. Bingham repudiates the main
portion Of the Union platform adopted In the
1 Ohio Union State Convention last year, and
. re affirmed this year without opposition exi
D cept by Mr.. Bingham The last part Of the
q following resolution is that portion to Which,
8 Mr., Bingham Objects if IL. -F .e..i "a
ri .Resotped, That The present deplorable
e civil war has been forced upon the country
0 by the disunonists Of the Southern States,
now in revolt against the Constitutional
S Government, anl in arms atound the Capt.
u ol. "a sd 3adt ego ygE eE'74Ha J,H =
$ That in this national emergency we banIsh
y all feeling Of mere passion or resentment,
Q Mill recolect only cur duty to the whole
n country: that this war was not waged upon
I'd our part ii, auy spirit of ofoppression, nor for
II any purpose Of oyerthrowing or interfering
is with the rights or established instil utions ot
II the States; but, to defend and maintain the
SUPREMACY of the Constitution, and to pre-,
o. serve the Union, with allthe dignity, equal
k ity and rights of the several States nnim-
d paired: and as soon as these objects are &C
d complished; the war ought to cease"
On the 22d day Of July, 1861, John J
n,1 Cuttenden. having offered this resolution IN
s. congress, Mr. Burnet, Of KY, demanded a
d division Of the resolution, which was order.
l. ed. and the yeas and nays demanded. Mr..
!. bingham voted yea on the first part. but
y when the vote was taken on the last part, he
,e left his seat in congress and refused to vote
Tor it. lie refusrd, 70 vote for the Union
II Mat form on the 5th Of Sept. 1861, in the
to State convention n, lie again refused to vote
erl for il on the 2lss of August, 1852, although
he was a, delegate and present each time. -
in And thus he has three times wiliully refused
; to adopt the Union platform on which the
a so.callsd Union State ticket is now running
Of and being supported. He opposes this plat
9 form manifestly because his doctrine OF pros
y ecutlDg the war 'or lne purpose o. \.
te the slaves is distinctly repudiated by IT.
IN Mr.. Bingham's position IS correctly statet
tn by Andrew Patrick in his editorial Of ahe III
sul OF February last, and which was .repubishet
IT, in the Ohio Democrat of the l2thSept. inst
y In that editoriaf 11a Tafck, fe'''''ns " N''s
va ham, said: III spa Re-.
un "He IS IN iavorollne uncohol''ohal eii'ai
~ cipatlon-oi the fresiaeht az once ,ssu,.s
y proclamation ,fee'hs 'ne ou' n''',o"s n,S. y
y slaves. lie believes that TINS wat shculu
turned 'into,a crusade against slavery, .ns'ea y,
y, Of carry ing 1T on merely TO MAINTAIN VI
Va laws and CONSTITUTION M 1 o. our oofinon 'ou
~ try a.;,u, ,al.gL 49, .,, ~
~ What COMA DC more poS''lNs ',ian w
- - aUoVe 'anguage o'thsc osoai""a Ihs0n
as agoinst the ultra ADoiuohism Vi oohp a
w bipghamI ,g. - .,,,.
!, eth. Mr, bingham IS one o. ehe hieu WI
Z. brought to, pear upon 'ne p"ss:sas, -
a. heavy pressure OF wnch lhe rtesuens, f,tt, !
au ;.u his address 70 tne ooraer o'a'e Wslhos,s W
~ congress, ~ utt'eriy oon'pien'' =.
'u wholly close our eyes TO the iact 81. sia. M o.
G for the continual aglla.lon =. .ne saV, ~
question oy anu s,ayely 'hcn an0 e. W. -
. ~. leacefs o. the rsosl.oa eou,u ~ n's svas
iss M effaced the complete union o. tne lhaSsSs Th
;h he the south in tins nnhoiy reoellon a.as ~
~ this war IS the result OF tne amnesty S,e'
~ ~ ted oy the controversy aDou. M sho .; SU,
have no doubt. Ihat tne ul'fa &'., saw ave-
w; members OF congress haye doHe & nucn nai' S''
eAi to our efforts m 70 crus6 me reoeAsgn, "a,
n,Ino doubt lhat y fresipens n'noy'n ~ ~ -
w been lett Tree 70 manage tne waI y i,s ="
s. way we would pe mucn pet'e, ~ y uay,
: have no doubt. 1hat sne gooe " , 1ur oou' u.
- try requires the remover 2! tne ui.ia ~
DIE slavery men from congress, nave no coup
iah 9th. Mr. bingham mas Deen elshI ~ !,
10y siens In congress- ne was there wnen y