New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-05-22

owing 70 want of American Cotton and American
markets, az severely as England does, it is TO be
borne in mind that she does greatly suffer, in the
first place. and that in the second place, suffering Ia
France to what il has in England. Hence the Gov
eminent staiesInen of France and Its Imperial Chlei
State,man are likely to be more eager tpan those OF
Fogland in the common desire to zee an end OF the
American war and resumption OF American com
merce. "That the Emperor has twice through
of,iai channels invited the British Government o
co0nerate with him in such a policy in regard to
America a. would be most likely I'm his oPlnion,
.r cav in the ornion of our Southern Brethren ana
their European hackers to bring about the tefmina
ton of hostilites aud the opening OF ConleoerAle
nor;s ia therefore not unlikely 10 be an indication OF
The trutb Doubtless, the above lines present SOUTH
eide view of the TRUTH taken at some distance from Tue
ofcial originals, with more freedom than accuracy
of drawing and coloring hclion, IL you WIN,
bnt founded on fact. Observe that II, III me ABOVE
IN London the word "twice," In its firat lire, De
CHANGED to once, il expresses closely enough
what WAS. for the week or two preceding Napo.e
On q Throne speech to the Senate and Corps Legs
ianf last Winter, tie fear and hope respectively Oh
Union and Rebel men, and OF our and their iflehdS'
here and in England.
Iuit we'll to ignore these things Editors 40 as
they choose So can the general ieader. ne To-
nortinp correspondent must consult neither lls VIII
nor wish. must report facts they seem to him
being neither ostrich nor goose-withou' reSpecs VI
their agreeableness. ..
But with all the signs and reasons-and there are
more than l have given in this aud late precedlns
etters-going TO show that France ID more iorwaruy
am ious than England for an American pachcation,
I do not find one noteworthy sign or reason 10
change my constant opinion, based on ana c0hilIeu
by continuous watcbful, comparative STUDY Oh I'll
testimony within reach Of observation and memory
that the actual aud probable future Official Pohcy Of
IA nd All H.
certed with English policy. Hence the entirely ~,
Official quality OF 81. Mercier's trip to Richmond
The English Cabioet not wishing to take part IN II,
but invited to assist in friendly speetator:wise at
the little 30 TO speak, private French preliminary,
tentatory, formally-lncOLsequentiai experiment a'
mediatory concillarory Intervention. No more yig'
orous sort of Intervention than this 10 thought o.,
far The Dresent, by France, still lets by England:
Two articles one in The London Morning Post
of the 9Th inst, another in The London Times OF
the sth ins are worth noticing in this connection,
if only for the notice they attract from the French
public.
The writer in The Post, Lord Palmerston's organ,
treats NJ Mercier's onward 10 Richmond as purely
personal venture Of humane imaginative diplomatic
gentleman amably ambitious, ID the interests Oh MS
own country and Of the civillzed word OF oeiee III
strumenta in resolderpg the broken Union or IN re-
eopciiug the two fragments 10 definite, permanent
separaIon The article closes as follows: BLOOD
appears only to cement the strong bonds OF the
original Coniederates. While the most profase ex'
pendture has not hitherto o0sened the ties or UNDER
mined the spirit of the UnoDlsts. Az any rate, we
fear the present great campaign must be fought out
When the combatants next rest on their arms, tue
moment for negotiation may arrive. FOR the present.
any attempt in that direction, especially II
by foreigners, seems premature ana aseiess, %
much for the seni,olfci-l organ OF Lord Palmer
ston. | must ret down, In passing, the
uIe,sant remark of the Journal des DebatS upon
this article, or rather upon the Interpretation OF II
which the evening telegram from London seemed 10
give AS at expression Of sympathy with the North:
" Then j, would be the sixth opinion OF the En-
elish Cabinet on American affairs since the com.
meIsemont Of the Separalist movement. need
not remind your readers that the journal dss De1dts
has been since that fatal date consistent syInpa-
tbizrr with the North, and since the Orleans Princes
have taken petition on Gen. hcClellans stan, an
ardent sympaihizer Certain very clever articles In
that paper, rather tending TO sympathy with the
South ridr, signed III you will pernit the bulll
ANONYMOUSLY written by Michel Cnevalier or other
officially inspired Government authors are only
I to,ccd exec, tions To it's general rule.
/ Ihe L0HiOH Times OF yesterday plays essentially
the came tune III the Ministerial organ. II takes its
mitch rom the announced purpose OF one Mr. Slaney,
NJ. p to call on Ministers to offer their mediatlng
.lr.s 10 America. The Times depreeates the
slaney motion, the OIL, ring of it, the purpose OF It,
the di-cuHson of it. Recognition, and discussion OF
recognition by England, ale IDLY nlschlevous ana
premature. The patent policy OF Englsh Goverli'
III, Mt tie patiently common sense course Tor f.ngSi-
men IN and on, OF Parliament Is 10 do nothing, say
nothing interfering with American affairs tOr me
Dresent. 4" The time may well come when The South
ern States will have the night TO demand their re-
cognltion A day may come when, forced Dy circum'
stances we ought to interfere III some shape; Dut
that date has not yet come, and 1t would be foolish
anticipate the Opportune moment, or 10 Ireclritate
I the necessity in which We may ina ourselNes. so
much for me Isnges, the organ Ola great English
class and classes. Let us, IN our set-fespect, how
yexed by ITS frequent malice aud constant ea-
ing TO the South, heno iorego the stupid eier-
alton OF the sly charge that II is only the organ
of The London Clubs
Enough now Of newspapers, French and English
From imprinted well as printed signs OF the times
it is not too preentious 10 draw this horoscope OF
the next coming future. France and England, sui
fering gravel they are for lack o. raw cotton and
market for manufactured goOds, Will yet give us cur
own and more than our own asked for extension OF
time to prove, not by able dispatches nor yet by
newspaper victories, but by triumphant facts that we
can do, 10 "crush ont the rebellion" Iher notion
nj is for ua 20 prove by something more irreuable
than kilograms and newspaper victories, that 1t Is
an erroneous one) is 10 wait until Loyalty and
Rebellion shall have come 10 mutual exhaustion,
and then TO kindly offer, to dndly press their meda
ing office.
IL would be 10 criticise perhaps consciously, not
only our Government aud it's queer administration
of this war; but Northern loyal people, to slm-
Ily state the arguments which both our advo-
Gates and opponents, here in Europe, use against
each other. l suppose it will be safely printable
matter at least to simply point out the fact that the
three governmental papers here constantly insist
that OF the North not fighting against
Slavery to simply repeat the fact often set forth
in this correspondence, constantly evident, That
all the European "organs" that play the Dixie
tune, steadily, constantly claim dare not Fay how
well they seem to proyel that the contest between
North and South, between Union and Rebellion, is
not a contest between free-hoding and slavehold-
ing, but is contest between strictly material not
morally conflicting infcrest.