, 1862-02-15
LEGAL INTELLIGENCE.

OGDEN, FLEETWOOD s. Co. vs. MARINE
BAEK.-SrrER1oR CouKT.-This case which
has been on trial for several days past before
Judge Goodrich Of the Superior Court was one
Of unusual interest, and resulted in verdict
for the plaintiffs for the full amount claimed
On the goth april last, an Eastern party for
whose use the action was brought, left with
the Plaintiffs for collection and deposit in the
Marine Bank, a draft Of the Kane County Bank
on F. G. Adams Of this city for 81, $50, which
was deposited with the bank the same day,
and entered in bank book Of O.. F. t& Co. to
their credit. This book was kept in the name
Of the Chicago Marine and Fire Insurance Co.
At the time the suit was commenced O., F. g.
Co. had reduced their deposit account to tile
amount Of said draft and had given to the
owner Of it o check for the amount on said
Insurance Company, which had been present
ed and a,lnent offered in deprecated Illinois
bank bills.
The defense was that the deposit was made
with The Insurance Company and that the
Marine Bank and Insurance Company were
separate Institutions and doing a separate
business, ard therefore the bank was not liable
for deposit with the Insurance Company. For
the Plaintiffs it was contended that tho Marine
Bank had the benefit of the deposit and was in
fact tho principal in such transactions, and that
the manner of conducting its business with
the Insurance Company R,adeit liable for de-
posits with the Insurance Company. The
| Court instructed the jury that if the Insurance
Company was the agent of the Bank in recciy-
| iD. and pa}jpg out deposits, the Bank Was
George F: Bailsy, Esq; for plaintiffs; Messrs.
RECoRnER's Counr.-Thc session of this
Court was occupied yesterday in the hearing
a ~ e !, s,s s.s,'. 'eo'n eAs. VIC paf''s''-
iais VI "u'en WILL oe 1ouho eisc"heFc-
In the afternoon, the case Of August and
the charity yard Of the Young Mems Chris
tian Association, was in progress, before R. s.
Blackwell, Esq, the defense being conducted
bp a Tncle, a,,,, ,he n,oaoo,,t;on hu Io1,,,
son. The esse had not been Closed ss vi when so as
adjournment was lad.
71o1aoe I4T,11,ood 58sMClancery' XXX XIX
Rlo,x1 vs Hugh Maher ct Al: eosts paid and suit
Neeiy ct al; dismissed without p1eia1fec % On mo-
ticn Of eomplainant'e solicitor No. 445Nchance- Ia nee
| y r, r. Case ye. Thomas and Bridget FarreJi !.
masters report taled and confirmed no one ap5ear
| irg for The defendant No. 467-Chauccry X =
Hooper VI S. ". woodward It al: masttf's renort IN
made and filed Us to amount due On morteape an1
confirmed unless cause be shown to tic conirarY
BY Gontiay next; and then decree entered as nrc
a Hoffman ct al; report Of master OF sa]e con.
ti1med unless cause be shown to the contrary by
| today = -
l SUPERIOR couRr-Befors Judqe Grant Goodrieh
No. a2s-M. Winnemar vs, NJ. Eyustein: jndec.
mcnt; damages $i,5:5.e5 No. 6lS-ai. R5esTon
st II. r. Morris ct nj default against Morris M
| 3ss5-sanrcl Peck ct Vi. Ye -J1hn NelEon 1T nj !.
| Icavc TO enter down account by Leaving cnnv
No 6E-Thc pcaplc Re fnr nse of Jan1as KopTfo
and CathaIfne Kcefe r. ns-ne staIr Raet heetc
r. G. Hawle, and i. II CRY. d;.m;ssad ~ sn;
t,ir y cutte. No. 6T-B. BOND ~ r. i 11ont;na .
| cause cuntinned AMI iry;nn Tithdrawa ~
i>r.arsptc fur n,aintifg. Nn 1f1fNThc ,tapp-