New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-05-20
NEw.yoRk DAILY TRIBUNE. TUESDAY MA. 90 1852.


,ri. Of motion. 80. and Of appeal $40.
CO.. IL fIo.; az. yssras koGs e sc. aide
HsckeDsdck and N. T. Railroad agt Wm. Bosrdnan--Or
der affirmed with costa. $40
WIN. r. Bacon e. al Caroline 3 Albrrsop-Decree OF
Surrogate affirmed with costs
B'ioe 'e;,,,es sos.nAs Lroy,aD. and RosrEsAS
Ins. Co.judgment affirmed with costs Opinion by Rose
krsns J.
VIM Bostwiei ct al act Bank Of Mutual Redemption;
Theodore foOe agL john 4rrs ct .-Judsne1t reversed
snd rev s Vrd'red, oo's to abide event Opinion by n
James GIDEON .. VIM. C. Haeser,y-s Same decision as
lbov Opinion b. RO.elrso' j. Leonard, J., coacurrinsi
lnsrthau; p j., dissenting
Henry Chipprly ct oct. Daniel g SiueairJadsment
anued. Motion 'er new trial deGisd with costa
Bur Wessmap .gt John Daley e al Zoe People as,
Joseph >. SeDDil. sgt Theodore W Csawhuek; Nelson
Smith receiver, .g Samuel BALDWIN ais Mrs. Baldwin
as The same; Iho, T. Taylor at, The ,ame-o'ders a.
Isaac Bernh~imrr al ast. George B. FOo;e two csss.
hsmton Murray az, Stephen r. An.iin ct pL-ordsr to
produce BOOKS sned and eSsmin.,on to DO conGued en-
cept - 10 property a,ch passed under Assignment
iHE RosE WILL CASE.
In the case OF John Rose, who died in December,
i'9 leaving 70 widow dscendiris two brothers
thsuc.y Rose anu Henry Roseleing Ills next Of Ain. IN
h- will 81 which be Remembered al lis Telatye' lie leg the
principal psu Of biz propeuy which consisted OF one bo1'e
extensive benehcent association to provide farms Tor mai
tsuiug and eouc4tg white children especially began,
the heqne being conditional the raising within i've
years If f5W"o through oser means for the same purpose
IN of failure, hen hall II the &c 20 90 20 the Am,rcan
Colonization the oher sss0riatioI
be selected BY tho eIeor CThe OPhsn AY iim OF tho
Civ Of tnirstpn requested 5000. and e towns OF
Wrher.fed ard ROCKY Hill Conn 81 600 for The poor)
Doubts bsing All en- a. to che validity OF the VIII chsunc,
Rose Of the brothers aud executor brought sii oi the
pHoose Of having the inrunen iudicisly passed upon
Judge Allen at Special Term decided That the beqpesi o
a.. ,,sb.hmen Of benehceut association, by Of
y.ss.ress end uncertainty. wssvod.
10 this de'isiun te General Term now concurs The eject
Of the decision 10 to divide ID. nost Of the property among
the he.s D. !aw
QUESTION As TO PrIor.GF.
Ia, II -frr fhe
license Of Ralph Noble for dobeyng their oter TO refund
ps,sge In case where vessel was ~ronguy taken from
OF the Pilot Comussion ior the Latter given
Special Germ, which J. Skinned
TIE "PRErTY WAITER GIRLS"
IN the OF Josephine Bsy the waiter girl ceute bury
Hall Tho rendered decision hs It appearing that the
made up Tor the purpose Of procuring the Arrest 81
Alto ney declining to appear on behalf Of TIE peore
the Proceedings ossed aud The secued Discharged aud
so s cues, on Of con.tiutiouaty fai Tor the present
CRIMINAL CONVICTION REVERSED.
In The Court Of Sessions, in the OF George Is.
Clement 10 convicted Of forgery in writing TIE
othe pe.g teller Of the bark the face o. ste cheek
oT tho ,ccnsed it held lhst the oefthcle ored no part
Of he check aud the frrry not properly st forth IN ne
Indictment The Court oisssion' refusing to charge tie
General Term decides the Refusal 20 be enoneou and orders
q rial.
MOTION TO STRIKE ATroESTYs FROM THE ROLL.
In re Charles Us Nun and Peter NJ. Jordan.
This was n motion 10 strike from the roll OF attor-
reys Of Court The Of the above persons FOR the fol
towns reasons: 1t appears from the pager, that IN 1882
a.rued thirds Of tie claim TO John foFery. aiior
new rm Of Ga Nun Jordan Bara employed to
pTo.ecute claim against Hogan said firm TO receive
corporation therefor oss-hs the wohirds Owned by MI
Eoyey. Pending TIE rroceedirs' M ogan ded and SUB
sequ.ny Ca suA jordan and Wilcox Effected tetuclent
OF th- cas- with ibs representative OF Hogan.
N u claimed that this srtteneut was made without tue
lci Nj Foseuy that the money Paid 20 Csnun
Jordan andicock did amount 10 at ali adequate
claim .t they refued u tic arns % Fogerty ad
tcusy deued the day After the settlement that any settle
uent had made The defense deny that Fosorty ever
owned any part tie claim and they deny hat be ever bad
any interest IA The case The motion j. SIN TX Judge
De.uA VIM Fullerton foT motion, .rJudsc C0wes opposed
Cu1ABEss-AAi 10 Before Justice BAHsARD.
DECISIONS.
Cahen agt Cahen.--Me porsnda for counsel.
Wa. Watson e, a. at. Tho. l.. HGshDoEe e. d-iohon
denied with 40 cos's.
Cha Bliyen It 81 ag,. Fredk o. WheserMotion ior at
tAcLin.rt & anted bsiIsbe Ia 200.
john Hauna John ID. Dexter The sum Of 30 81 must
be d-ilc "a nom thr costs
Jai- smith az Nu1. Sn,'fh-Notion granted
: cochran AZ. Irs.- GafjrerH rrantcf Win stay
Bfleiam az Tacot--hu zion denedi 30 COTE "ish
leave 10 renew payment Of the 10, a.