Daily State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis, Ind.) 1861-1865, 1862-10-06

encc OF the party OF secession. Both were
sectional; both were revolutionary.
II would be idle TO show the revolutionary
character OF the secession party. It's revolu-
tionaFy purposes were avowed. The Repub-
lcan party was no less revolutionary, though
It's revolutionary tendencies were less manifest.
1t is evident, from what has already been
seen, that Washington and jackson. ft repre-
sentatives of the sages and patriots of the
revolutionary and succeeding eras, regarded
sectional parties as revolutionary. Under
our system they are essentially so; for no sec
tional party could accomplish any end, except
by the seyerence of the bonds of fraternity
and unity between the different parts OF the
country upon which the Union rests. IL is
not we who say, it is the sages and patriots of
the past who have said, that in American pol
tics every sectional party is essentially dis
loyal to the Union.
In almost every State Of the Union, in
which the Republican party had the power,
they enacted laws impeding the execution of
the laws OF the United States. Such laws
were passed by them in this State. A Re-
publican Judiciary for this State nullifed acts
OF Congress, assumed TO override the decis-
ions OF the Supreme Count OF the United
States IN cases arising under the Constitution
and laws of the Union, disobeyed its man.
dates, and sanctioned by judicial decision the
forcible rescue of prisoners held under the
judicial process of the United States. But
not content with this measure of disloyalty,
the Republican Legislature of this State
passed in 1853, and has ever sirce refused to
rescind, resolutions setting at defiance the au-
thority of the United States, and asserting
the doctrine of secession as broadly as it has
ever been asserted by any Southern State.
This is well understood at home, by Demo
Gratis and Republicans; but to avoid the sus-
picion OF exaggerahon abroad, we here insert
two of these resolutions in full:
'ResOlred, That the Government formed
by the Constitution OF the United States was
not made the exclusive right or final judge of
the extent of its powers delegated to itself;
but that, as In all other cases of compact
having no common judge, each party has an
equal right TO Judge for itself, as well of in
fractions as of the mode and measure of RE-
DRESS.
''Resoired, That the principle and construc-
ton contended for by the party which now
rules in the councils of the nation, that the
General Government is the exclusive Judge
of the extent of the powers delegated to it.
stop nothing short of despotism, since the dis
erection OF those who administer the Govern
ment, and not the Constitution, would be the
measure of their powers; that the several
States which formed that instrument, being
sovereign and independent, have the unques-
tionable right to judge of its infraction and
that positive defiance Of those sovereignties
of all unauthorized acts done or attempted
to be done under color of that instrument, j:
the RIGHTFUL REMEDY.
These resolutions had relation, not to the
acts of the executor of the United States OF
even of Congress, but TO solemn decision Of
the Supreme Court OF the United States upon
the Constitution and laws Of the United
States This is the doctrine caught from Sc.
ceding. South Carolina by Republican Wis
consn, and repeated by the Republican party
of Wisconsin, in full communion with the Re-
publican party of the north, to justify seces-
sion in every disloyal State in the South
Thus the Republican party. as well as the
secession party, was revolutionary. And
these revolutionary parties grew in numbers
and influence down to the Presidential cleo.
tional of 1860, when the Democratic party
was defeated by the sectional influences Of
both.
The sectional party of the South succeeded
in intruding some members into the Demo
cratic Convention; and when defeated there
by the steadlast loyalty of the true Democracy
put in nomination a renegade from his party
and his country. The sectional party of the
North put in nomination distinguished gen.
tleman, the author OF the doctrine that the
several States must ultimately become al
slave or all free.
The Democratic paaty nominated as then
candidate statesman, now no more, OF great
experience and ability in public affairs, o.
great energy and integrity of character and
life, the author OF the only just and practica
solution of the question of slavery in the Ter
ritories whose whole public life was devoted
to the maintenance of The Constitution as il
is, and the Union as it was; and whose yea
for the preservation of the country sacrificed
his life in its prime.
The history of the Convention which nom
mated Mr.. Douglas, plainly shows that the
champions of secession had 10 hope to carry
the people of the South with them, save by
defeating the candidate OF the Democratic
party. The whole tone and temper OF the
Republican leaders and press at the North
before and during the session of the Conven.
ton, plainly shows that they had no hope o.
electing their candidate, save by diverting
the South from the Democratic candidate &c
the Secession candidate. Thus the action o.
the two sectional parties tended TO the same
result of the Presidential election. Had Mr.
Douglas been elected, secession could MOI
have prevailed at the South, and the severa
aims of both sectional parties would have
been alike defeated.
The result was the defeat of Mr.. Douglas
and the election OF the Republican candidate
We have no personal objection to the distin
guished gentleman who now sits in the seat o.
Washington. His election was perhaps les
mischievous than that OF any other prominen
Republican. The evil of his election belong,
to his party, not to himself. The good he ha.
done is in a great degree personal to him
Republican as he is, he has not forgotten hi,
old national patriotism. If he has not always
he has often. resisted the abolition element IL
his party. and stemmed the tide of its revolu
tionary course. In this he has done the
country immeasurable service and we hope
that he will continue to stand as barrier a:
well as against the most destructive faction o
his own party. as against the armed enemy o
the Union. The responsibilities OF his posi-
ton are such as might awe any man; and in
all his efforts to sustain the Constitution agains
revolution and innovation, he has our hearty
sympathy and support.
The election was the signal for the move