New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-09-06

| lis only defense mas ocon sonci IL
denial, procrastinaton, ienal points, end
frivo.us lodges, characteristic OF tho man.
lie evidently hoped to tire tle prosecution out,
and escape the certain result by some sort OF
compromise. But though The stake was not
large, hlr. Marine and his assisnees have
persevered to the point now reached.
Az matter OF record, We print here the
decision Of the Court OF Appeals. 1t was rem
dsrcd at the March term. bit attracted no
attention rs it was Only announced by ttle,
thus: Bixby vs.. Wood, Judgment affirmed"
Nobody recognized, iu this little line, the great
Marviue case: and since then extraordinary
effort has been made, the public may suspect
by whom, to keep tho matter still. Fortu-
nstely, tho Record, OF the Court are always
public, and the attempted concealment was
simply impossible. Ono further fact remains
to be- noted: This decision was rendered five
months ago, and yet 70 this time the money has
not been paid in accordance with the Judg'
meut. An Injunction wa' granted BY Judge
Barnard agains. the entering of 'se Judgment
granted not only against the attorney of the
plaintiff, but ageiuek even the Clerk Of the
Court; Ii las been upo'sible even to get
bearing IN the case before Judge Barnard, who. (
Tor tive long months. has, Oh one pr"ioxt or
another. postponed the Learius To this Day
its sum of nearly 1900. obtained BY fraud,
rs repayment ordered by the highest COnrt Of
Justice in the State, remains in tie pocket OF
Fernando Wood.
l. CoURr oF ArPfAIs.-ByZby sgt. WOOD
CorLD Jsore ofthe grounds boIa Urged "a r-Ter'n TIFF
ud,ment are te moment. Such sh- poi1t rs'
e.ened In refusing to GLOW tie aseudens s'oh orconleF'
e.a a. to certain moneys sd By him. which soins &
9al .rscieusly answered beow tia. ih' sadi - up
nor ,s,-os aud therefore could D.
allowed Tho claim Of error airiti evidence 8. 20 the
letter = = Larkin ~ ma ''rslY az 1u1d't since y
30, w., t, t,undston u tle scou o. clearly afmi.
in and II fari re, po the found. en- tie evIerce
utterly vslue-s thai T. could 80 nave irhnen'eo ne
II tue referee, and 10 ND rg'i even le" 20
10, s@msut pls . blsd On Il aud no iuor-
10 de- claim that tbsro wa, If psr''r IN IN. Nor
vine msds .rei,y Iir'l. tl~.e e'mPieie az
Ia law. In that sch p'lnt uas aB 'rI+fy tl'a
eher by susver md il l. not sed m eit-r
Do. res party n "''T'si Is e.gc'sy - "a ~
ss,rr,d and us.ferrrd 20 se psin'r. sim. srd oe,
mod, which he had arsinh dei' dtnt sr'nf on' ~ sa
id ilro. Ic Ia teff coFen s 'tt no iff''r' 80
taued - r. scriJu. To" ql"ton tn any ea'@l
whether the pslti" itr ute perry w. inots or "1"i-f
tho II under which he 80. mere u % orc
ih4. -rsy dfrhdant 10 entitled 10 Try ~ i w 'e ~s upon
fais lrficst heynf or IN c"n'r'dicn o. me 'n
ut, pspsf t'. O. ',pns nt PEE 10 10" r ~ one oi "
g. ihs resss. have 20 Ya''"d I'D ne hn1irH -
taken On tho Part tie ds',n slf which thet 90,
.ciion 80 "a n zoe CONF snt - i'a -, 'ul
mi @scst ,ud til. s0rh az s'''on wss - ~; o.
.grh a.Iro tb,, re & sot.ol l. nct a'sgnsbis
Tho 'hoo' ei,t o. u ,.r."1's = "a ..l q ts'i
zion hiaii I,ou w. Allen Htfi - ,tf y ~ =. 10
k,u Jrl g. fAr .nsssr he posion ah'- they rho~
lens r,g,,ops',ous hy uhc The de'-na.s, nr. ooiar,d
~ Or Popfiy b., T., ,',a - 'i o. ~ 70 80
esre. az 49, o'.S o. -, y 80 ,, - ~,
e4oa acc thereby ito pisinh. woe tr-i tl'r usi'irr
The s'eudsn aof u pepe,iy vs. ZEN % ., '' :,
v..s rrr. nas.d ~, Ard to the~ D.. or. it
va slot. q n 3 iS.l Sec ) such :, BY
h- hoieu The fsp a. tlna hs ih- rc ~r''f -
- 80 ,r,~.v 10 Lio1 b. Wa, not entitled snl they have
fsnt bot the money which lie defendant nd 90 received
,t. 81 is,is aoes is require ar,G Co 0e
Sac. .e,. always s..ed g. H., Toe iny sd pr us- sei
~. the contract cause Of nI !n r4-lfIfl iff7 scr 90
money hsi I'D received ha.na nou"y fnst l Dy bee
len 10 enothe. astt AL sl@rsve. o ~ ts
without, rpIsssd prou se 10 p-s e lev n J.. prom
e sd tie aeIoA always sound ~ ,ort--st nder ile
Cle this mp progi'- treated - heon AID ~ itois
los o. WHOM the pr Jaw 'aed IN po ses are 20 be
.siel vi b. at sny defus'n o. {. m o. seton. oni me
law lvcs such judgment a. ror ascc i = ppfop sie to
hr 'a.t. o oou-s- ~ e1nnes moss 's' 81. pat.' jar
rir..s Make par,c1s sn of ti'r, % th.t pNts o.
H. may ls Ai rel oI' ron tie ienedy M".cI o. 81
Will si.s him lie may .se'ed 70 n@iii ni,eoueeisr p
H. i.hts a. &" 10 comp sD' ct a. ,a-f.ra -heft -
h.t d. oH-rol pfo"is even 81" F.o,. 20 ~" 90
jrc'.ou ~ond rsaA" en ~ni4i' re-" c'm at
n, q. a n. snd oela ,i'lf for cuey received or owln,
on faso sni ffsuda eut af1u. a. Gree "-'h
NV, 6c b, OH of t.- t..ns. oa betura Marine
oi psut -. 'ls Voc IA .- fs-- s"t issu-
nt Representation. hsti1s shout tar uDc,fs psi4 for
t.utuently sud t,o~.uiy on,aiael F.ep-fty -. ON
Ia. demand iuisncn, sln.. he as,-n int ior the VI
- 81. o. vita int-su., lfo Oc.o3s i's Ir'u n'reY
scten e.niss dan' Tor 'le "Io' sno uas'' % o'
-r'ariS ard uasTo.'ii '1e rla .. .i'''--s. '',e
y. ven his no. NV suoccffsy sotLa Tor u-th
ms bic Judgement Nha' 'ad eu' zion D. te'e to ie.tiHs
st containing atasnsnt % The iacis Nh.l show N u
ksUirss psyurst SO. It Y'lil'y onf' WIN Mo"lsltt
cover b,t the money! Gn4 % ant cp4firs enie Hov
without tuch sts snf va - % snow tat u wac ne,
w., lisl .ad binding On hA u {, avoid ritls.
of tho oI'conf . nl ston io "h'A t mo la.a ne
20 1 h. eI,r"t. thai 81, 20 ,I. 40 l.se Of
sriou n s be- loa c 10 sI.igsht. Il VIII tr seq no ac
NJ lnat cls of 'o,t he ilhi q tc0a r which would n
we to tEe personal Tepfr'r ta.s # tie cnat, and the
eonv'rtiol, proposoons tLepF Il 49,. suh ken 12,
end n.il,r swlinin the tees u bcth lore and since
ID h o sssisu Die ~ . H. Mckee, Si isli q kea 62.)
be thst d-nand sr.isg .ou injuries .rtS personal
othsr. AZ" t-eo l. .n 80 l1N y. Il D.. q - and
hy tle k.,i,ed ,ttu,.a 81. Soc .rvuhss que 30
toe Jruprtv 4.i. or !ne of tfrf 0r Which bf cotton
nls. BE- maintained a.. such H-on 81 orough. anef
Le tr m Of tc per-t Iicd by is exec ofs s.uius
ut1r- in the 49, actions 10 lndrd upon
sc- Auo abe ezcrpons L. thi bfoo g'nsa rule ore CON
tanned IN she rciion coniLeh 20 ini.rles o. TIC
e. m or ehsfscte ia tscss- u The ao be Tor tie irlud
AID ds.t Is for viuu. done % iEe pinpoFtg 49, ~
.sr~ .ad By the 5tsut, cond b brought after be deah
b. he personal T.uf-..naiisr, snd - usiguibe Ia" te
f,nd.ns cOuus. al 80 that tr nndu.s Of fact by
the referees sus'nin the Judgment became they
fn nd ..I O. D 8
co3snt at, IrIr ih1t tnes have rot fouul t7 l.ct
Of f,ld hold 90 =. lh- scon !. sttnabo without
MONEY which 10. Descendant has H.h' 80 rlain, the
furs hnd fraud l. ou ion 10 no validity oi no JDs
A. A, !, ta b.. ifurt hs!ar