New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1862-06-05
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE.

The SPEAKER announced the business before
he HOuse 20 be the motion OF Mr.. Porter to recon.
der the vote by hieh was rejected The bul 10 ise
nom seryrude the slaves OF those IN rebellion against
the United States.
Mr.. PORTER Rep, Iud. said that the BIZ was
too eweeuiug snd iNiscriWinae. IL Affected all
persons however remotely or indirectly implicated
in the rebellion. In ts judgment 1t imposed severe
aud excessive cbasiisemont upon many vino were
driven into rebellion by mOnetrOus misspplehenslon>
uisrcpresentaiion, and osnsion; ana who. II We
overwhelming pressure upon them were removed,
would promptly assert their loyalty to the Govern.
ment. The provisions rendered insecure the title OF
property owned by loyal hen in the rebelllom
States; men who have been faithful 10 the Consiu-
ton aud Union, amid every form of insult and hs-
initiation. lie would not encroach on the properly
OF the thousands OF brave men IN the border slays
States, who yindicating our flag. Bat q bin
onght 10 pafs 10 punish the consprators who orig'
mated the rebellion, and their not less guilty
complices. His Object ia moving reconsierais
was 70 have the bill recommitted TO the Special Com
mittee on Contscaton, with instructions TO report
substitute declaring free the slaves OF those who
shall hereafter hold office OF profit or honor IN any
the rebelious States, or under the so-caed Conee-
crate Government; also providing for the acqlisi
ton OF lands on which 10 coonize such freedmen
with their own consent, and denationslizing tbe
aforementioned class of Rebels. He eontenied
that such an act would cripple them as a political
and governing power, without intrencLing on ibs
rights of LOYAL men.
Mr.. PHELPS REP, No.. in explanation said he
desired to what he could to suppress the rebellion
and restore the Union. He believed the African
race were IN better condition under subordinsin
than free Ii dawes ARE declared or become free ID
Missouri they are To be eA elled from the State, n
they cannot emf CRATE TO the State which The gentk-
man in part represents.
Mr.. PORTER rep. Ind replied hat Indiana
preferred W hte men, while Missouri has chosen Ne
9roes to develop her agricultural interests; bat tbh
hx ~ a R.h shAuH
sessei Of their slave property.
Mr. VALLANDIGllAM (Dem, Ohio moved to
table Mr.. Porters motion TO reconsider. Nesa'Neei
10 against 50. IN
Tie vote by which the Slave Coniiseaiion oa,
was heretofore reelected, was eeonsideredi o.
against e..
Mr.. PORTER then offered a substitute Tor Inc
bill and moved to pat it on It's passage.
Mr.. KILLINGER rep, Pa objected 10 tt.
IL was great improvement on Tie ofiei uiiii Vn
he was not prepared 10 vote for any tucn hieasu"
without examination, aud be simply voted 10 rtcos.
,ider for tina, purpose. The reconsideration showes
that the Conservative men are powe. IN "s
House AZ well ss III the country. en-
MFR. PORTER now moved TO rccommii the OIL
the Select Committee, with instructions 70 i-pet, "
substitute as Indicated III too previous paf' oi 'neS
Ile motion ,,as agreed TO. 81 against Is.
Mr. Potter substitute aud AN amendment oheiea
Lv Mr. Dyeu We're ordered 10 be printed
MrWiI.SoN Rep, lownl reported from i,e, ,Sa,
mitee GA Jadiciaiy q biii Geciafihs petsops .'Lus
oes under the so-called Confederate States forever
inelIiynIe 10 office under tie United States. Aref
~ h,i,f debate the bill WAS passed by 81 majority.
Mir. COLFiX Rep, Ind inquired Of Mr. bi0g
ham what action the Judiciary Committee had taA.n
ON IN. bill furnishing nautul.nt contractors WIN
fine and Imprisonment, referred TO them ny "'
House some weeks ago.
Mr.. BINGHAM lRep., Ohio replied tha, s0s
Committee had referred il totDajee Thomas o. aa4
sachuset,s, one Of their members, and the eAres'a
10 be able 10 report OH 1t next week Ad''nihe"
The supreme Conrt OF tsfscohssil'
M.tlnr.aaV. June 4 lcOs