The Mountaineer. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1859-1861, 1861-03-23
Tie people Il Utah !. IT.. y.

Ths people q Utah v. Hov,,a -,
The peopIe Of the United s,.,
n ~ (! q Utah " MyrOa Brss.ss y.
lace. y, so ,n n. Wal
The people Of Utah j. n
Phelps and Henry spierS ty =
dian. u, 81 : Oaas, an IA
LhepeOpIe q Utahvs Rodney 1 III.
The book commonly called 4. "A,
docket was next callcd, upon es., ~ a z.
lof which orr reporter discover ,as. .
than - eases ID assumpsit 80 70 ls's
some little discussion irs..,,,l i III
case Of Magraw VS.. Little n ron ss " The
Fof: Mr. Miner moving ~ Nh; s,ILssssaaence
I original answer which he and NJ, ~ ~, ne
commended was fled Ia comlliarS y ~. nsous
compulsory and Unprecedented rM
the court, Of which tIle, Ioa cL auaas Of
Sinclair wasjudge. THIS ruIina 1910. - Z,
4 TO be made IN tile conrt ~ I,,I W. sald
4 s,st,11 iSS's. pttlaI y W law, and tllat NJ
y gu pafhes cencerGed we're ahsois,lt
rslairsu, % PAN 0t dismissal Of mn !,
,lie t'lcir answers BY the 18th dav n ~
tember, the day on which IN ~; y sep.
term q sula eourt commenced. Tbe n
/ t2fneys also argued and alleged IN, !,
4 t9e Hele peygWere compelled 10 file tLsA
'a 49, tlie!r CLIENT, Mr.. LittIe Was. ~.
i SlelNlt 'iie3 jurisdiction Of the court ara
tnas no y service 4. ~ had been made. III
.,ns,ser tl,ev W. , sa'N mat by filing an
riee NH fLat !, live" NV she right Of ser.
IeIetian e M $500 wv sh.lsely az the dis
l ,ss1 - t sls souIt 70 allow the with
", !. ,'.s. ". Il. '''lss faS Their remedy
II tbe witI,, IA NM II. Penale court; but
IN ,,as,,,t ,,'.s oely asked for tho
~ e Y. answer
i X a6n,n e;,,s S' 3. ", 49, y.
sJ fsst. W y ~ ~ = : N,sss y which Rad
~, ~, ''.,os = ~ slla 1e late Secretary
~ 81 " 49, q, ar.aes were called The
ises AZ ,,Itns 4, abntSr s. 49,, and pro.
upon m counsel eya,,layaa ~ ,saas Nnere.
tiITs cai,aant 81 ~ ~ IN, - y. w PLAIN:
AZ the cost ~ choir IN ss.es us'nssed
/ ln;ta ! .nn,hsr ~ p;,,.i M
aisS,;sscd ana ~ KIM. ssses were
ILa ,.ssa 81 80 re Posyu "
i f,.rt;s cf.s.. 80 ~, .su, y =, spencer vs.
4 ,r;al s;so ~ h,.s w ntst sase Drought
y I'LL uPVn i y, merits !al H.
80 ~ ~ ~. I, |" w y petit
49,. Z, ivsu y iatseha upon the
sn. ~, .''s ~, .s1ss.e salieu' accepted and
:" Z $3.50 wy s .'4'ti s: hit
samuel 3 a1ll. Main stephen II Goddard,
= q ~. irlpp William e. ,Smoot
= ona I tlrnpew, Ferry Fitzgerald,
aiiila ~ Y, smith " o. w Casper
Albert Dewyt Joseph 5. Scofeld,
Z, anE,den ?, Beatle, Leonard ". Hardy,
ahomas Jodd Edwin I, Woolley,
l.ll, Ne Toner, Thomas Gallister,
iditott haItwell , William Walker,
John ~: " oolley Enoeh Reese,
Josepn II; ltawllns, Farley i. Pratt, r.
J lS1 J.:oteeklittS, Edward 4. MumioEd.
Mr. Miner presented the ease to the
/ jury for the plaintiff, and Mr.. Mccormick
tor the defendant. .. .'e:.s .zsE ...2.tll.
The jury. retired, and the court I'D.
journed till tomorrow at s. am.
/ On Tuesday morning the court met at
O'Clock. Tho jury enrpaunelled yeste;.
Day ~ tho case OF Spencer VS. Clayton,
rendered q verdict for the plaintiff in the
sum oil 5000. s:. b !: .y.;:: -. :..
lie civil docket was called, and sever.
al eases dismissed, tome for Ion-ar
Peafallce, Diners Tor want OF service. The
Judge Informed the bar that It their plead.
Jugs were not ready when the cascsWhich
they were Interested IN we're called they
would be stricken from The docket, He
sad the present was an Important season
81 the year. ~ Q country Ike this, where
the. MAJOR part OF the inhabitants are ag-
riculturists, and having a due regard
Tor the interests OF the citizens he was de.
tslrens Of getting through the business be.
lore tEt me court IN one sSeek. which he was
satisfied could be done, If parties litigaat,
nnd their attorneys, would be ready for
trlal When called . . II,
In the case Of Guthrie and Mitchell,
and VIM. Nixon, garnishee, vs. Charlesst
BLOW y Co., on appeal from the probate
eeurS which was tried on Tuesday the
jury came into court on "Wednesday and
returned the following vertlict: u =.
Wedo not find any evidence that
! Nh', Nixon was indebted to Guthrie aid
NJ t;teil, 81 the time he wasgaruisheed.'
Mr., Blair filed motion TO dismiss, In
the case Of Mngraw VS.. Little, on the
ground that the court III which suit: was