Watertown republican. [volume] (Watertown, Wis.) 1860-1906, 1861-02-22

y, L.
0. Of G.. T., for the present quarter
Vim. J. Barrie, W. c.; Mrs. Jane Tancre,
W. Y. T.; H. L. Porter, W. s.. Mrs. Sarah L.
Hurd, W t; j. NJ Haight, w. F. S.; D. Da-
muth, W. NJ; ]. K. Purdy, W L G.; IL.
Merriam, W. 0. G.
Ia At the present term of the Cir
quit Court, the following named gentlemen
were admitted to practice at the Bar. viz
0. F. Weed; A. II. Pettibone; John B. Crosby;
and F B. Boswell. The examiners appointed
by the Court were D. F. Weymouth Charles r.
Gill, and J, NJ, Bingham Esqrs
Temperance Meeting-It having been
announced that Doctor Jewett would speak at
the Congregational Church last Monday eve
ming, quite large number of persons were pres
ent to hear the distinguished lecturer. He
failed to arrive. however, for some cause which
We have not heard explained,
The meeting having been called to order, Oh
motion Of R. P. Bronson, J. A. Hall was called
to the chair and the following resolution offered
for discussion:
Resoloed, That we are bound to use our in
luence to abolish the sale and use Of intoxica-
ting liquors as beverage, and that to this end,
we will do our utmost to place men in office who
will discourage the traffic in all legal ways.
Msssrs. Boynton, MoIntire, L. A Cole, and
Reed took part in the discussion. The speech
es were short and pointed, and the spirit Of the
meeting showed that the cause of Temperance
is not dead although it sometimes sleepeth.
Circuit Coaat-We resume the publica-
tion Of the proceedings in the Circuit Court now
in session at Jefferson, where the same closed
last week Most of the business has been dis
posed of and the probability is that court will
adjourn to-day. The session has been an un-
usually short one. The following shows the
disposition made Of the several cases acted up
on sncs our last report:
Reterred.-John McFarlon vs Cyrus Cush-
man Alexander McFarlon VS. Cyrus Cusbman;
John Vim VS. Cyrus Cushman John Gudge
VS. James Tiff OF. al
Continued.-Catharine Burr vs. Mil. Wat and
Baraboo Valley r. R. James Anderson VS.
Nil. Wat. and Baraboo Valley R. R.; b. F
Jones ct, al, VS. A. H. VanNorstrand, ct. al
Josiah Hall VS. n. C. H. Garrison.
Report Ct Sale and order Of Confirm alton fled
Joseph Banker vs. George Redel ct al; W j.
Brown VS. Y. D. Green ct al; Thomas Hovey
vs Peter Harrison; julius J. Stow VS. Sanford
Ingalls, Daniel Marble vs. George Edison ct. al
Henry B. Gallup VS. s. P. Day et al; James
Prentiss vs. F. Z. Shandrew et al; c. G. Har-
ger VS. S. ?. Day ct al Jefferson County
Bank vs. s. P. Day ct al; Luther D. Peasles
ct. al. VS. Ann A. Ainsworth.
Observation-Disclosures Goodnow vs. Joshua
Thayer, Asa aville VS. n. S. Greene Peter
Blair vs. Thomas Meyer.
Diyorcss Gryntad-Rachel Lee vs. Job T.
Lee Esther ". Harrison vs. John ". Harrison
Anna Kimble VS. Nelson Kimble
appeal tsnsisssd-Gsorge Burnham VS. Isaac
Forbes ct al.
Demurrer Orsr7uled.-Frederi J. starin vs.
tbs Bank Of Jefferson.
Demurrer Sustained Henry Berlmer vs. the
Town Of Waterloo
Judgment acknowledgements McAdams vs.
Charles Goldner.
Djsmissed-George II. Damn vs. James Win
II. Ii. Hosea Prem
tiss.
Judgment Of Foreclosure. Riggle vs.
John G. Anselbrook Admir- for damages $3.50
SO. Bank ofInterior vs. Harris Gilman ct. al,
for damages S1714 So Chester Il. Gilman VS.
Henry Vaudel ct al, for damages 1914
Jury Cases.-Daniel Jones VS. William Costi-
gan et 81, Verdict for Plf, 1925. Enos &
Hall Att'ys for Plf. Gill, Barber & Fribert
Att'ys for Def'ts.
Leste. Sexton ct al. vs. n J. Gallagher
Verdict for Pl'ffi $2692 40 Enos s Hall Att'ys
for Pitts
Porter Lewellen vs. NJ B, Williams ct al.
Verdict for Pl'f $3.50 Enos & Hall Att'ys for
Prf Williams and Leonard and A. L. Collins,
Att'ys for Def7ts.
Reuben Farnsworth VS. S. H. Burhans et al
Verdict for PTf $3.50. Mertz & Elweu
and Charles Billinghurst Att'ys for Pr if
Smith & 0rdway and A L. Collins Att'ys for
Defts
W. D. Hilyer VS. VIM. Woolcock. Verdict for
PIf S263 48. ]. E. Holmes Atty for Prff
Weymouth & Thorn Att'ys for Delft
James Chappel VS. D. s. Chadwick et al
Verdict for Pl'f 1874 70. Enos & Hall Att'ys
for Pltf. Williams s. Leonard Att'ys for DTS
John Padley vs. George Eason. Verdict foI
Plf 1854 so. J. NJ. Bingham Atty for Prf
L. B. Gaswel Atty for Def't.
VIM A. Allen ct. al. VS. S. W. Barnes ct al
Verdict for PIfs 1914 SO Enos & Hall Att'ys
for PITS
James Prentiss VS. Norman Brewer. Judg't.
for Pl'f and that he recover possession of the
land in question. Enos Hall Att'ys for Plfs
]. Z. Holmes Atty for Delft.
l. ". Forbes ct. al, VS. George Turner ct al
Verdict for Defendant. D. F. Weymouth Atty
fer Pl'fs. Caswen & Thorn Att'ys for Def'ts.
Isaac Forbes VS. George Turner. Usury
verdict for defendant. D F Weymouth, Z
Holmes and A L Collins Attys for Plf7s. 7
Thorn, L B Caswell, and J ] Enos, Attys for
Defts.
William sanborn vs. Chicago and NWRR
Co. Verdict for Dsf't Holmes and Bruett At
tvs for Plff, Enos & Hall Artys for Deft.