Cleveland morning leader. [volume] (Cleveland [Ohio]) 1854-1865, 1861-07-02
2eaal MQtifcs-

Ann Louise Allen, By
ner n-Kt friend, col
Luz No Sc, e Rod1-y Court Of Common Pleas,
=. Oakley, and Others j
THE SAID RODNEY H. MATHEWS
Il and CatherineF Oakley, who are nou-Tesidepts
o. The STATE Of OhtO, are n titled that tns said plain
tif, on the 10Th day OF June, 1861, FLED In ssid Uourt
her petition against then aud samurl Maihsvs, a
resident o. The eo"niy Of Lake, IN the state Of ohio,
and OtEer7s stating in substance, that on he 81 day
o. August, 1875 she hled IN said Court htr petition
ssainst The said EOdney u. Matthews, tWhdss vie
So then Was3l praylUg % be divorced IRON him TOR
he cause Ofadultety with ons Lucinda Mills, and
That said Court, at the November t.ru ,bsrsot
lsoIf oroeied the aid Rodney to pay her $50 as ALI
monJ pending suit and that At the February torn
t9eA OfI4ss, raid eau-s was tried and a decree enter
ny against the said Rodney Ia the sum Of 81 on IN
adlit on 70 Ihe ; I'd sum ofsl50, which sum wereLy
q d hodhsyI staeCs IN sid county. The petition
IN this cas- FUR her states that thB Sc q Rodney, az
ter the hiirg VI sid letit IN fr divorce, to Ere
vent the eoheetton OF such reasoDsble ahmony as
me Court should decree 70 her, on the trial Of said
cause Without consider ton, pretended 10 convey
BY quit elIm deed, ons equal moiety Of the folloN-
the SAID samuel Mathews, to wit: known a. being
part Of original lot No. s., In the Uity OF Ulsveland
bounded as follows; beginning on the northeastern
ner Of said lot on the southerly line Of the Public
square running thence s0utherly with thu ~easterlg
line Of said lot to Champlain strecti thence Wsste.l ~
with the northerly lice Of Chgmplain street 81 Eut;
Themes nOrtheriy 1t right angles With plain
street 10 tbs Public square, thence e~astsrly with tue
49,. -A1AAN = -1LAA NtaAu VI NEaAlAAuks IA
50, that The said samuel Mathews received saId deed
tor the sole purpose o. aiding the said hOdn.y in
placing his interest 10 said premises beyond the
reach OF the plaintin, and to defranl her.
said petit'O IN further STAGES that during the pen
deucY Of said reutiOn for divorce, the said samuel,
at the request Of the said ktdEsy, aud Gr the pur-
pose q more en5ctuAny 81 Wings said premises beyond
the reaeh Of said deer Q for slimony, moItgaeodt the
sid real estate to the sad atherine r.. oakley,
Whois sad petition allegest had notice Of the faudu-
lent intentions Of tne said kodnsg and samuel
Tho prayer OF said petition is. that the said Quit
Claim Deed, frum the said kodney 70 the said Sam
uel DO set aside IS fraudulent; that sad mortgage,
II iOund 10 nave been received In good tatth, Be post
pOned 70 the said decree ofthe plaintiff, aud that the
said premises, so Conveyed 70 said Samuel, Be sold By
order Of said COurli end that the proceeds OF ssid
sale be 0ppied-lst, to the payment Of the amount
due on said decree and costs 80 entered In favor u
the plaintih, and that the residue abide the order Of
said court.
Ihe sad Rodney II. Mathews and Catherine :.
Oakley are also notified that they are required e
answer said %petitiou on or before The 3ist day CT An.
Bust, 1851. 3. y. AXTELb,
luue27s37 Attorney for Plaintiff