New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1861-11-28

/
uunism, sul u paasionsl attraction and Development
Properly s. hcc" the len gusgeof disciple Of thai
s,hool; lost e. Slavery e. su,' with TUs frruSr folks
We "a agree .t property lal be bold subordinate to the
ecsiei Of -ad Therefore commander ia the fed
fss aaoi,sd 10 .c, ase an and dcstioy property
Whenever be deems i. Necessary. Bat WAT wood we iaA
Ct commander who following tie advice Of PIudhonu
nd Greeley that whereas property ard the love q property
are i The root Of all evil offered the nsea.ioa and fnp
port Of war therefore ell property should be henee'ot
abolishsdl To state such propoton IS to exhibit IT,
sbsurdity.
Lot property u slaves be treated amid the necessities o.
war a. property In houses. IL h5rsss Ia breadfs 10 mnn
oi In aUds. and yessonake such Of them the a
sou;c exi.oncy Of wGke operations requires but 90 moi
beyond There necessity Of SHy proclamation and least
Of III opToclmatols OF general conhscaiiou, which convert
az exercise power IN sec6cerse wtIchihe public mortl
Of the world uifes into penal infection loyeled dserim
Dsicy upon whole people without the excuse Of necessity
Having thus given conspicuous insertion t.
/ the whole Of The Areps's structures, TIL
IRauNE requests that Journal TO give equn
prominence to this reply
! |. TIE A7gHs is msiaken--utteTly mistaken-
for we viii trust that its fault is the impulse
OF malignty merely, and net Of nesdaciiy-in
| lis bold assertions that TIE TRIBUNE " once
% held doctrines which deuied the existence OF
property, and which aimed OF the recon
% struction Of Society on the basis Of Com
.. munism," &c., &c. We demand that TIE
| ArgHs, falling to prove this charge, shall dis
tinctly and thoroughly retract If. We doubt
not it is also mistaken in its assertion that the
French radical Proudhon holds any such doc
trine; though, never having read his works,
we are not certain on that point. We know
enough Of him, however, that be is not of our
school, nor we OF his--that be is not Com
munist, as We certainly are not aud never
were-and that the sentence "Property is
theft" which has been somehow wrenchcd
from his worke, gives no fair exposition Of his
views. Little as We know Of the man OF Of
bis writings, we know enough to correct a
iraducer who is ignorant even Of his name.
We dissent very broadly from many ideas
which We have seen published os ProudhOn's
but we are none the less confident that he
agrees with US in rejecting aud condemuine
Communism. If he is proved Communist,
we presume it viii be as the Infdel proved
from the Bble-by quoting the express words
that " There is no Ged."
III. Col. Cochraue's words-not CARRIED, but
fully and accurately reported-are as follows:
"surpose the munitions Of war are within our reach
wonI nj be guilty Of shameful neglect IL syeed
Ourselves u the sotsni 20 u's ,hcm7 suTpose the
any sqcelmishnes efain from pointing agaIst them The
bose gun and pross-g them IN deatbi ho shat is
OBJECT aid puIpoi end yon wosd seize her property,
open their pore and desucy their lyes ask you
whether you would not use their slaves! Whe.het you
oud NOT their slres great applsuse cqd CdUV em Ia
Ja,t,ons agaa., heir H6,. ,afnea cd aAd tuiulivou.
spplansc.I 7 Tale properly wherever you msy hna
It. TsAs the slave sud bet5w lin upon TIC noIlayeh.dei
II yon please lgreH applause DO 20 item as ley To0d
% TO Raise up pa y Of n,ee't sssirs tss ab,eas
sgGa take The Stare by e haHd pioce nuskc' in q and
Goqs bid him sFhe Jy tis hbctfy 81 me hu7an
Taee Immense appisusel Nov, ia this enancpaen2 l.
this Aboinomsu? do hot regard i, IS euler 1t 10 aoo
paakss Of ABB togn tnan Spaniel pstskes Of ne naiue
Of thc on Aboousn is TO free the Slaves IL TO Insh"
war uJon the South for tia; purpose Il IS TO place them
above thei, the social scale II IL 20 Assert the
reat district principles ~ eq sy enoug mon But to sAe
Inc Save and nale hin az Implement d 10 overcoming
ity and he commauieI VINO does not tLis or sopehDg
10 H. is anso,,hy Of tie petition be holds aud
equally unworthy OF your confidence"
-Presumng The Argus to have no more
idea than Col. Cochrane Of disarming and re-
turning TO bondage the slaves after We shall
have once armed them and babe them g strike
E" for the liberty Of lie human race" we heartily
accept that journals besitating and qualified
of Col. Cocnrane's speech as
cheering sign that the world moves, and, NOV
ing, goes ahead.
III. Let US more fully illustrate our differ
ence with The hrges on tho "contraband"
question.
Ii happens that slaves are moi "houses," nor
f" horses, nor breadstufis, - but MEN. and their
feelings are therefore a matter of consequence.
Is it desirable TO have the sympatbies Of -Four
Millions Of Southern People actively and ar.
IDENTIFY enlisted in the cause Of the Union
We answer frankly Yes, and we do not see
how the authority of the Union is to be vim
dicated and re-established without. They are
a decided majority of the whole People of South
Carolina; they are nearly or quite a majority
OF the inhabitants of several other rebel States.
The experience Of this war has already fully
Fcyed that the contented. happy, joyous slave
IS myth-that every one Of them longs to be