, 1861-01-23

STATE or 1L11so1s-cousrx or cook-ss.-Jo-
seph Knox Of said county. being duly sworn, on
wss one Of the attorneys associated With Carlos
dtctmens assnst one tosiah W Bistei! lately tried
In the argument OF the motions subsequently made
In reference to the Indictment present
ed in said court against the said Btsse This a4t-
ant further raith that 1t no time during ead trial.
were there any manifestations Of an{ pretndicn on
on lie contrary It Vas the opinion Of this atiant
til TIL an smong the sc counsel for The people tilt De
leaa1ngs Of the court were against them and in H.
vor Of Haid Eistcl This afiant further saith that
were made, Judge Wilson remarked repeatedly to
the Prosecuting Attorney, that he very much de-
sired that the prosecution Tould ecnsent to the
upon the legal saficiency q the atadavits exhibi
ted by the defendants. Thfa consent Nj. Haven re-
fused TO give This afant further saith that after
aid motion. III. McAlltster, one Of the attorieys
for the defendant remarked to the Court that nine
tenths Of tho people outside approved Of tho yer
That be knew not how that WAS, but however It
might be. the counsel must know that the Court,
II compelled to act could o)y do 50 upon thof facts
stated, IN su5staace th.t ha did not suppose that
anything ssid or done outside or inside Of tha
Court would hare much effect upon the Court; to
wha IA dddM tg soe
might BE- both gcntlemanly and professional, Or
thsy might Be ps!tyfogtng hs Togld aot unds, ;:s
that he at the time noticed and was somewhat sur
prised at the calmnexa and coonesa Of the Court
under the provocation given to 1t By the manner
md the language Of the counsel. 1o:. hNox.
Jos, E. c. Poaa1sT. Clerk.
SurEn1oa Ceun7 OF CH1cAGo-SIats qf Minois,
Coot County, ks>-TaElton Jones Of the city Of CHI
GtzkA Anf1- fx-f~ SntH
avorn deposit th and saith that hs was . juror for
the term Of the Reeordef's Court Of the City of
Chicago for the December Term last, and wAs ons
w. ''e ni.ser Sc INN impleaded @ with WaiteF F. Chad.
wick fos 4 conspiracy to burn = portion q
she Ratlroad Bridge extending "a across the
farthtr saith that d1ring ths entire tFal Il said
Cause the conduct rulings Of the Recorder, Rob
ert S. Wilson. In reference to The said cause was
such as to Impress The ml9d ot ms 9epone1t tnai
towards the said defendant, Bistet. And that thi.
dc:,oncnt saw no exhibition Of impartiality or feel
Ing, prejudice against the esid defendant On the
Recorder during eafd trial Waa such that this depo
nent was not able to gather OF infer what tho opn
lon Of said Recorder Vas a. to the merits Of said
case And this deponent further says that biz atten
tion was particularly directed to the rulings Of
said Recorder and during said trtal On tho que.
tons Of law that were raised and thts adiant wa
warat said defendant. BASEL. Ana this aepoasni,
further saith 3hat Whe1 me Fe1uet oI ac9ut1tAl T.
was fctu1ned me Hecorner e,3a IoH3aa4kna I; a IN n
substance e follow: NoH. ~: bassea i nasane
been stated by counsel Inat tnese waa
~ Chicago against Eoa, you ouent not 70 tatnK
that that prejudice ~ inlnFed yoa. ios Ian nave
hs1e hsd the, Mayor and put ,ot the
city ro4iro and Newspaper 70 aseiet !ou'
slnce the time this Indictment W. ioqna hoa r.;
HAVen. don't yon to1nK yoa ou&os ~ oe k1na t
enough to allow tae prisoner 70 9avs snls 2o1 @ o.
nnid that was sent hese om ", aoaa H.. a. aao tha9
thu esme was said In quiet manner nol N An ao9.
6tvc nor insulting manner, ano tnat tnls ~ -. a.
that vas said By the said ReeordeT On The rendition
Of said verdict 10 Ar. BdsseH 70 ne best teeelee
t4on OF this deponent; and further ne deponsnt
says not: T4M1oN VI soSEs:
Subscribed md s*prn to this 17th day OF jan
uazy. L. D., 1ss1. 5os. E. G. FoRa1sa, Clerk
ma.4 -,
| 1hefe curious pont II Inc amdaHat ot
Andrew Enzenbacker, one of tho Jurors, to
Il
which We cs@l special attention. Why were ne
and hia hrot,,ap t.lpn ronna tn a room in
.sn--.--
WHICH biseell M, ano tne1f 0tat1s lot jury ee1-
- -. c..-.-S- - -.-s...,