Cleveland morning leader. [volume] (Cleveland [Ohio]) 1854-1865, 1861-07-15
ITiVHEfEfl VEffl' SAID SI4 f'I5SIF RoDrrr H. MAruEws


US Morse, Vs, Rodney Court Of Common Pleas.
Mathews, Catherino Cuyahoga County.
THE SAID RODNEY Ii. MATHEWS
and Catherine 4. OAKLEY, Who are non-residonts
tin on the 26th day OF June, is6l flied in said court
her petition against them and samuel Mathews, q
resident OF the county OF Lake, in the state Of Ohio
and Others stating in substance that on the ID day
Of August, 1851 she filed n said nourt her petition
against the said Rodney u. Mathews, (Wh0se wife
she then was praying 20 be divorced irom him tor
me cause q adultery with one Lucinda Mills, and
THAT aid Court, At the November term thereof
1857, ociered the said Rodney 70 pay her $50 ali
mony pending suit and that at the February term
ed anhulnR said marriage and granting her alinlo-
ny against the said Rodney in the sum Of S20oO IN
addition to the sid sum Of $50 which sums were ~
said decree made charge the real estate Of the
said Rodney, situate in said county. The petition
IN this case further states that tha said Rodney az
vent the collection Of such reasonable alimony as
the Court should decree to hcr the trial Of said
cause without eonslaeratlonl pretended 70 convey
By quit claim desd one equSl mOiety Of the follow
ing described real estate, situate In sad county, 70
part Of original lot No. So In the city Of Cleveland
bounded a. follows beginning on the beast cor
3sr ol said iot on tho soulheriy ne q tne Public
square; running thence sonthery with the oasterlg
line Of said log to Uhampian street. thence westerly
thence northerly u right angles with Uhampiain
street 10 the Public squares thence easterly with
Public square "a feet 10 the place Of beginning Al
So that the said samuel Mathews received said deed
for the sole purpose Of aiding the said ROdnsy in
reach 0i the plaintiff, and 20 defraud her.
Said petition further staees that during the PEN
deucJ Of said petition tor divorces the said samuel
at the request Of the said Rodney ami for the pur
pose Of more ectually placing said premises beyond
said rual estate to the sald tatherine n. oakley
Who said petition alleges, had notice Of the raudu-
lent Intentions Of the said Rodney and Samuel.
The prayer OF said petition Is, that the said OMIT
Claim Deed, from the said Rodney 70 the said Sam
uel be set aside as fraudulent; that said moftEaKe
iffound 70 have been received IN good iath Be post
pOned to the said decree Of tbs plaintiff and that the
said premises, conveyed 70 said Samuel b sold b
order Of said Court and that the proceeds Of said i
sale Be applled-lets 70 the payment Of the amount
due said decree and costs 50 entered IN favor Of
the pletnh, and that the residue abide thu order Of
The szif Rodney H. Mathews and o.therine =.
oakley are also notined that they are required 70
answer said petition or before the 3st day Of Au-
jSii jasssSsg ~ ATOMS p ioT S1PsHla PIsiassa
QY VIRTUE OF A CHATTEL |
~ Mortgare, made and dated Febraary 6ih, 1881,
~ n BaaF ls . ne, on the property described be-
low g secure the payment oi certain judgment,
rscorded In the Court Of Common Pleas Of Ouyahoqa
County and the costs therein IN my Ayor against
Plaintiffs costa, t5,55-l73f0, with interest from
Deem 0or 2ofh 1889 have taken possession Of
and shall oer 0T sale af public auction on the fth
lay OF June, 1851, At 10 oclcok A. one Glue Fac
aiming thereto, lot Of Bones and about 3 harres
II Glue, and lot Of materials for manulcfurfnd
Glue, baing the property 60 mortGaged 70 me- SD
Blue Factor5 being EncE1 as Haakiss Gius Facto-
asf corner Of Roekg0Tt tovHsAip and said aais ln
AXE place at said Glue Bae.oZy, II
Cleveland, MaE a, lssIss7 ~ u