The sun. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916, 1861-08-07

TnE NEW YORK SUN.
"WEDNESDAY meKHLya AUG. Z. 1854
LeaAL RUroRFs-NTEsDAY


! tsNN ~ WIZ ara IVA .@NHs
Befcse Jndgs IsoRAHA.N. ..
Cas- ofBde,Ley me Sirrti C7edDia, Contract
tor. He Id'ts u appear ho,ioa .foy. stdy o.
| PToceed'Hss.-Ths Court mat pursuant 10 ID.
icurnmsnt, and for the purposs Of disposIns. Of
'ne case % Andrew j. Haekisy. who some Ins
since Ileas.d geilty Of sontsnp. with tn.
understanding that he would abids bv IN a,
pies nnless IN, Court q A 5p.ais shouId 49, =.
k'm ffom the nscsssity Of ass v.riDr the aaa,.
ton put him by R,cOruer IIonnsn' a. "a -na,
became Of $4,000 advanced oy To Hop. <
Co., in the mater Of the Strost Gle ming C,n.
uset. 1hs appssi TO the Court u Appeals not
bavirg bs,n h.srd By allsg,d isasOn OF The de.
lay on Haekisyb counsel IN carrying the Gaze
MP District Attorney Waterbury proposed 10
toe Court 10 hold baehlsy 10 his plea ofgiIy
TO the indictment FIR contsmpt. and move n 4
iudgu emit might be entered herein And,su
y hAekay having beea tsioe cls', 4 not
stswsring the District Attort ~ moved that
bis recognizsno.s DO declared frfer.d
Me Fuilertcn kpq Cvun oil for Mr. Hact.
ley moved that oil fur'hsi proceedings la tn Q
Gaze he stAyei until al ~ voc usx' 81 tidR Of
the Curt az Apfeals vhsn, h- said the ca Q |
before the Gut Il App, ais wodi be tiied
IL he bad appsvsd a. this tim. tbs District |
Attorney might have movcd tor s,nt .ucs, and !
Nj Hschley -pn'snosd aud snbisctsd TO i'm. |
piisctment Tbs csO would probably cone |
up the hfst well OF tho next tsfm OF tue Court |
VI Appeals, as IL was a prefTrsd csss on thu |
calletder. ~ tbs motion was not granted, |
then COurtel woald AJAX 20 withdrar toe D "a |
OF guilty, AID e.u Asw plea o. not gully |
he Court statsd that the vhols matter pre- |
ssuted itself 10 bis mind, aad he would arrive |
At no o'hsI conelasion than that the wsos Of
AR. A'oklys prucsedipgs had bssn H. huenood
rot 80 mnca 10 secure him hts personal r1EhtA
a. TO obtain delay. For III, fsJurs TO app sAr,
Mr. HAchley alone ives r,tpousibls.
M..NNa a.
not respot s,bls for any delay, his q juns,l bad
only ooeirsd 20 pql " mater Ia such slsPs
that there 900 u ~ misunderstanding o. Il,
AID the who's subject might be 80 tied up at
orce.
III, Court remarked that under the clreun-
stances Of the sis ulstion OF appeal, he doubled
Whistler hr. Ha h.y should be allo ssd 10
Ans,d he plea 10 the Indictment.
Jas ) B'aay, Esq. thought that tbs part
OF the stipulation male tbs right 10 amend
the flea TO tss Indictment only the strcngur.
and he pledged him elf that Cjuussl hs { one
all In their prwsr 20 obtain a hasriug bsfJre
the Appellate Court lie also accused the
District Attorney Of pcr,oeutins his clisHt, And
" pursuing an unusual courss In trying the
case bsioro the Conrt during the summer vaca-
tim
Thu District Attorney I'D the case was one
~ 9r,at pub nc Importance TO ths ciNzsns Of
New 7, k, and he believed II his duty to bring
lAb,r,d ass'drousl, u do 40, and believing Il
hts DUTY lie should labor astiduously 10 that
ebd. TIE next term ~ the Court Of Appsals
wa not until the last Saturday II Bsptambsr.
20 bad cone all hs c)u,d 20 aid counsel TO get
the ca Q before the last term Of tho Court Of
Appsa's; had agreed that ihs matter should
10 oiought up in any form Me-. BNCWLTYs
council might ds'ermiGe, but 10 had ne yer
consented 30 any delay.
The Court Sid hs thought Mr.. Haeklsy's
conduc' in falling To app,nr was somewhat out
o. place, and 20 be condemned, bat as II id not
| clearly spPsIr 10 hin that 10 the matter Of the
appeal he had Intentionally failod In diligence,
| he felt rather Opposed 20 giant tho molten to
stay prCoosdirgs for the PRESENT. IL appeared
that ~hi the stipulation was for tho appeal In
TIE hobeds covTns, the District Attorney had
consented that tho appeal should DO carried up
On the Ger iorni and this eaanse miSht have
c,uitd part o the delay. He said, however,
hat ho would postpone the subject until next
| tu,tdsy, when hs wtuld decide the mattsr,
but be would say that thor, ME-, HsIhl'y mus
| sprei-. for wlthou. his PRESENCE he would not
| g ant a stay In any ev,n.. The Court than
ufn,d ill Tuesday mkt.
s.rrsrHte's Court.
The wa of Mrs. Parish dnly admitted The
VIII AZ Mrs. Susan Parish, widow OF the late
Hsbfy Parish was duly admitted to probate.
| She leaves legaoi,s 10 several me m ,crs OF her
family, amounting 20 $li, 700, TO other indi.
vid uAls e25, 900, and TO charitable associations
$780, and thsn directs tbs executors OF her
LATE husband TO pay over 90 her brothers the
sum of $500, eco gwen by the will Of her bus
band.
Court OF Gs SERIAL ses.isss.
Before Rseordor HorFMAN.
The folio wing Grand Jurors were sworn 10
for the August term, this mtrning. aud chArg-
ed by the Recorder
Thomas NJ Partridge, Foreman. HYATT
StsJ hen, WIN. Il Mcconnell, James Moffat,
Richard r Roe, b. Scutts, John +. Ssbly,
James b. B-swst.r Martin Dela6.id, HIg.r
| Mauiics, George g. Lake, ASahel Minor, John
J. Towriend, VIM. A. Thomson, James d.
rsyloE, James Apologize.