The daily Green Mountain freeman. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1861-1865, 1861-11-09

anu "oAou ie"'e =" s'e again grated s'es
ned N'''a'e adjour
llorsr;-Pr'ye' by Rev. Mr.. Howard ~
lain of the Senate "afu, Chap
Journal OF yesterday read and amror,,
Resolutions BY Mr.. Cushman RI f'g p
that the Clerk of the House be dirsc.a ass'c0e'ter
cure the printing of the bill nov bemn 10 pr,
, by Com. on Military Affairs in parts prepared
delivered to him adopted fN''S' as lts
.Senate Bus Relcrred.-An act in add;.:
Chap ~ OF e. ). relating to common s .ot 10
judiciary Com. bill Incorporating O',@| %
chce Division OF Sons OF Tenn peranco NJ V'"qls'
ON. on Corporati- ms a bill leyazmsy H. ITO
J pounding cattle &c. to Com on Acr;oso .e In
Engrossed Bills taken np.-Bili rsla';l
change OF names and constituting heirs a, e. %
Mr. Miner of Manchester. was IN co. 81 Law.
general legislation, but believed that ' ,h Of
would be of no practical benefit II. ;e NHl
SO from The former bill which had bson Juusel
upon the same subject and did NOT passed
special legislation. present.
Mr.. James was opposed to the bill al.o
thought it would open the way to enu Iss " 1
igations ; because Of its requirement ,ba, Il.
son of sound mind &c. The question m;., PEI,
difficult to dec de. e"'te
MIR. Balch was strongly in favor Of tba Nm
and hoped that future Legislatures wouId .,I O'A'
unIavorably to bills to change names ''p"'
In reference to numbering the sta,no, 49,,
such special laws, he hough, it expersv. WIN WV
unwise. '14
Mr.. Myres thought the law would he H.,
letter upon the statute book, if the bin n.s' ,a4
The expense OF changing names under ,5 9n n,p
visions of the bill was very Considerable f ~,
stated that publishing notice of the cba,. ~
as required, would cost at least ten doIIo,ss
He moved the resolution be dismissed
Mr.. Smith OF st. Adams stated that tho C,..
reported this bill under the lnstruc,ion. Is va, .I'
House after they had reported that in ,b n'
opinion no legislation was necessary. Wv"
The Com. still thought that any law vonll
be no more than useless addition to the ~,
utcs There was no way to prevent petitjm. ;,
legislatures for such objects us changes NJ ,1'
kind He believed it right and proper thar snat
petitions should be entertained. This was
case similar to the general banking law vb,o'
did not, and could not cut off the consti,urior,
right OF petition.
| e The House ordered thu bill to be dismissed
.s ReSoiution,- Nh Barber OF Lubbardo,
that the Com. on the { and List lie direc,pd =,
enquire whether mo,-Ke was not made IN
footing up oraud LAST Of the town of HubbarJ.
ton Tor the year 1860, and report by I'LL orO.l.
erwise adopted.
Senate bill A, an act to raise troops, came
up az special order.
! Mr.. Noycs was not proposed to vote upon.bs
bill until the military organization which til.
Military Com. We're considering, had been
brought before the House and moved to max.
the bill special order for three o'clock Of Ta..
day afternoon next
Mr.. Gardner hoped that the bill would no.
be tabled but action be taken upon it wlt.Ou,
reference to matters which were not connected
with it. To delay was to stave off the bus.
ness Of the session.
Mr. Noyes thought general plan Of acton
should be adopted, and every part OF the paa
was important, and unity could be obtaIneloa.
ly by considering all parts IN connection.
Mr.. Smith Of st. Adams, though agreeing ID
many points with the gentleman from B:nnmg
ton, still thought the bill, even in view Of tue
argument he had presented, should be tailed
Mr. Pingry thought it best to begin syas
here to ac,, and saw no objection to beginning
here, and was in layor Of acting upon The bill,
unless there was something objectionable IN The
bill itself.
Mr., Gardner urged that the military CON,
had reported favorably upon the bll, and
would hereafter report nothin, inconsistent
with this action. The ususe refused to table.
and the question was, shall the bill pass
Mr. Thomas moved to amend.
Mr.. Miner of Manchester moved to table,
and make the bill special order Tor l-2O clock
this afternoon agreed 10, and 50 ordered.
The bill relating to annexation OF part VI
the town Of Elmore to MorrlstOwn, came up
as unfinished business
Mr. Myers expressed sympathy for the pool
little, oppressed, town OF Gilmore
Mr. Hallock thought it would be bette! 10
wait until another session, and then make 40
onset, and finish up the town at one stroke Il
anything was to be done.
MIR. Baker of Enosburgh, moved to dismiss
the bill
Dir. llendee of Mors,own, sustained the bill
at length, and made illusions 10 the symPa-
thies OF clergymen Who were members with one
another, also to the facl that he had pot from
illness, been able to associate with lawyers Dis
own profession as he would like TO have done
MIR. Hallock replied 10 What he deemed al
improper allusion to the clergy.
MIR Boyce wished to know the ground OF re-
monstrances that had been presented 70 so0f''
alton.
Mr.. Beard replied that it appeared to M
Com that some neighborhood difficulty ns4
been the ground.
Messrs Bishop and Herrick did not 50 uD'
ierstand il.
The House di missed the bill-ycs iOo, nSy'
l6. aa
MIR Baker moved to reconsider
Mr.. Waite OF Braintree, moved to table 'h'
notion to reconsider. N1
l. l. L.