New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1861-07-26

Freu oas Own Correspondent.

Freu Or Own Correspondent
TCRM, July 9. 1861.
. The Austrian crisis 10 ripsping. Tbs Adde'S
of the Hungarian Diet, presented by the ChUx-
nan of tho House of Commons and Of the Hease
Of Peers, was not received By Francis JOSEPH.
He refused it, since, ss hs declared in he rsysf
letter to Count AppoDyi. the Chairman Of tAs
Peers bis hereditary rights to tbs throns u
Hungary were called iu question, and his dignity
was sighted By the title given to him. He
therefors reminded the Hungarian Diet of ~
precedent of $780, and in frm bat cslm fsn>
guage, invited them 70 alter the address in such D
form that he might be able 10 receive it. The iea
NJ once complied with the royal desire ard withsas
any discussion, unanimously acceed 10 the req,iasA
attentions restoring Besk's eyiginsi words sassk
had been struck out By late amendment OF tie
revolutionary majority. These unexpected proceed
iuge Vt the Hungarian Commons and Peers greatly
astonSshed the Austrian Minister'S mean G4s
Chevsher Schmsrlng and his centraizing colleagues
For them the substance Of the Hungarian addrsss
is "a dssgreeable as the form, aad they had areddy
prepared a manifesto, charging The Hungsr.ahs with
treason and threatening them with measures Of
repression. The Hungarian Minister'S, however.
carried the day, ssd succeeded 10 restricting he
dispieasure of Francis Joseph ts The form; While b.
the quotation Of the precedent u 1890, the coutis
uity Of the Hungarian constitution was implicitly
acknowledged. Schmeriing however, does n -
once give up the game, and, 10 order to ssrengshsn
his position in tho Ministry he csnningy contnyDd
that ths House of Peers IN the Imperial Counsel
should pass an unanimous vote, Ofaring the fpn
concurrence of the Austrian Peers In any strnnie
for The dignity Of the crown. Tbs sarue fares wcs
to be repeated in the lower house Of the IDpsriai
Council, but when DR.. Hem, the chairman, vio<sf-
ing the rules of the house, proposed that to
[.9 .f enA
By reclamation pass q similsr demonstration Of ioy-
atty, one-third Of the members remained eeato1.
that is to cay, tho Poles and the Bohemians. Tho
Chairman, seeing that some OF them wanted -
speak, declared the proposition carried and the
meeting closed. On the next day, Count Pcfes1n
and Mr.. Wesor protested IN the name of their eel
leagues forty n number, agaiast the uBpafzln-
mentary proceedings and thus destroyed or II Issse
greatly weakened the moral eject OF the intso1sd
demonstration which was to strengthen the has4a
ofthe ceutralis'ng ministers. But Schmering par
saeG his policy in spite of the check he had received
and The Deputation of the Peers got the answee
from the Emperor, that in the eoution OF the Han
gsrian question he stands by his Speech Of the
Throne which does not acknowledge the Hnngartnn
Constitution. Thus he is now committed -
the Hungarans and to tue AustTians upon
different principles, and nobody can even guess
how that situation may ultima tely change. On
Monday he received the Hungarian Depues.
ton and declared that he would soon sss4
bis written reply TO the Diet. That reply VIZ
form the turning point 10 the policy Of Austria. 10
must either lead TO a Cancellation with Hangary--
but ia that ease Schmering and his friends take thes
dss siOn-Or 10 the dissolution Of the Diet and ths
state Of siege, and thus Of course the Hnngsriaa
ministers 90 out Of Office. Ii is the last moment fos
Francis Joseph bis determination decides sbssde
his future; once more he may choose between peaos
and war bpt probably il is his last CHOICE.
Tbs Pope's health is improving. The kouaa
question RENAME unsettled.