Cleveland morning leader. [volume] (Cleveland [Ohio]) 1854-1865, 1861-08-05
4eaal AGtiees.

The sssts Of Ohio, Court Of Common Pleas.
Oarolins Eshenbrenasr,
George EsbBesbbrsppsr- Fs'''i0n i9F Di'0''e.
NEORGE ESHENBRENNER, OF
~ Marietta, in TIE county Of Washington, and
StatsOf Ohio, ,ig notified tht tarollne hen brenner
did, the 18th day Of AIay A. D. ls6I Die her Psti
ton IN the of1ce oftbe Clerk Of the Court Of Com
sd STATE ofobio, eSrsas S 2 B hs aid eorSs 20 5ss
bIsnner with Adultery, with one Elizabeth K0l-
STsnnsF and ssEi1g that she may 3 ayoEess om s
BE- for hearing in six weeks from the date herewith.
Dated this 18th dsy d Nay, A.. d, ls6l.
my29g25 By Pierre A. Collier, her Atty.
Ann Louise Allen, byl
her next friend, col- ires.,s.r'i'
q lIsshe9s, Catherinei CuFaho9a County.
?. Oakley, and Others
THE SAID RODNEY II. MATHEWS
ald Catherins 7. Oakley who srsn non-tesidsnta
tin, the 25th day Of June, 1851 hed In said court
her petition against thea and Samuel MaiheEs,
and Others stating q suhsanci that on the q day
against the said Rodney II. Mathew 8, tWh0ss vie
she then was,n praying % be divorced nom him for
the cause Of adultery with one Lucinda Mills, and
That said Court, at the November tsrm thereof
1851 ordered the said Rodney % by Der t5o as all
mOny pending suit, and that at the February term
then Of 1855, said cause tried and decree enter
ed EnHulina said marriage and granting her aiiIBo
ADDITION to the said sum Of $50 which sums vere by
said decree made charge ucon the real estate Of the
said Rodney, situate in said county. The petition
in this further states that the ROdney, AZ
ter the Ming Of said petition for divorce 70 pre-
vent the Collection Of such rees0=abls alinony -
the tOurt should decree % her the trial Of sid
cause, without considerstiony pre- snded 70 convey
By quit claim deed, one equal moity Of the follow
ing described real estate, situate IN sad county to
the sad sannel Mathews % Wit: known as bsing
part foriginal lot 30 So in the City OF CleYeand
bounded as follows. beginning on the northeast cor
OF said lot on the 8outheriy line Of the Public
square; running thence southerly with the eastarlF
line Of said lot to Champaib street, thence westerly
thence nOrtherlY & right angles With Chanplain
street to the Public sQnars fhenee eesterly with the
Public Square s. feet 70 the place OF ginning. Al
50, that the said aznuel nafheg received said deed
for the sole purpose OF aiding the said EotuQF IN
placing his interest in said premises beyond the
Tsach OF the plaintiff, and 70 defrEud hef.
said petttion further staee1 that durfnG the pan@
dency Of said petition for divorce. the said samuel
at the request Of the said kodney and for the pur
pose Of more eectlaly placing said prem beyond
the reach Of said decrse for almony, Origaged the
said real estate to the aaid faeherins r. Oakley,
who, said petition alleges, had notice Of the ln1u-
lent intent lions Of the said Rodney and Sauuel.
Tbs prayer Of said petition is that the said Quit
uei Be set aside as raudnlents that said moftgage
found 70 have been received in good faith, Be post
ponod to the szc decree Of the painf and thht the
said premises conveyed TO said samuel BE- sold By
order Of said COrt, and that the proceeds Of said
sale BE gpPied-lat,t t9 the PAYMENT q ne amount
due on said decree and costs 90 entered in ayor of
the plaintiff, and that tie residue abids the odar q
he sad Rodney h. Mathews snd Catherine T. /
Oakley are also notified that they are re9niTed to
fune2T.347 Attorney for Plaintiff