Cincinnati daily press. [volume] (Cincinnati [Ohio]) 1860-1862, 1861-06-20
LEGAL NOTICES.

Tg,lEE, STATE OF OHIO, HAsIILTgH
w. Maddox, late husband Of Della Maddox, de-
ceased, and John MADDOX; william MaddoE, Mar
Robert Geyyn Maddox, hsrs. law of Della Mad
The said defendants are hereby notified that on
siss the eth h day a. APRIL p p ISL ths ssid gant
ing therein, stating that on the 2Jth Of May, ls43.
William Miller was seized in fee Of the following
its Of the City of Cincinnati, county Of nsmilton.
and State of Ohio viz;
leased By Sd Ws% msr s9o to uRare B 1enp u.
and extending back westwardly seventy three al
Miller by Joseph OopPerwaith, Thsmas Dunlap and
Sa9 ooSsd sy .SS 9S m @G By Sss
south by a lot sold ahd conveyed to Fias Mover,
Of The bank Of the United States said lot beipg Sit
mated on The easterly side Of Iookp2rt-ayen1e be-
cnnAt, snd avenue having beon laid out since said
2Qih o. May, A ID lsia; that on said 2th day OF
ileRe of purchase, to one Dennis for the term OF
fourteen ears, and said lease providing that within
Dennis should erect thereon brick building that
iffaid Dennis should not elect TO purchase said re-
said inprovements prov that said Dennia entered upoa @
said premises and within two years from said 20th
erected Iilck building on said premises; that IN
the year 1851 said lot and building and sl the
vested r. said pleintif and are nov owned by him
that sod Miller has departed this life that in pro,
eegdngs in partitions among the deviseTa OF said
Miller seid lot Of ground was Get en and apgrisd 70
dCS deceased, for@eriy M wife Of fGamas I'M Msddo1,
subject 70 the terms of said lease that before the
toAprii J. 1857, pisintlf being the owner OF said
term and contract, elected 10 become the purchase
sf said reysr.ion and fee simple that by deed
owner OF the one undivided half part Of paid prem.
lntestate, leaving Thomas II Maddox, her hus-
baud, and the other deiendapts above named, her
been takeo Of the personal OF said Della Mad
dox, deceased; that plaintiff has pgid the interest
that has accrued on the One.half Of the purchaser
money to he paid to defendants; that plaintiff Is in
= on Of "a and has made lasting
the eremaininS moiety of purchase- money upon the
yided one. half part Of said premises aud demand
ing that the terms Of said Lease be specifically per-
plesd, answer or demlr TO said petition before
the 22d day Of June ID 1861, otherwise the prayer
April 25. 1861, - " --''''' aps5.f III
SUPERInR- COURT, OF. CINCINNATI,
= HAMILTON COUNTY = No. l47oO -Jason
/ Drake, partners, as Evans & 90 PaintiGs; vs..
Weshingon B Butcher and John Butcher Butcher,
Morris 0san, sarnishee. The said defendants,
BUTCHER 4 Brother, are hereby notified that on the
fled their petition ia said Court stating that
& 6Tan made or9 Bin Of ea r the
sum Of s5,OOO at sixty days and iodGfsed and di-
the same was duly acoop pied By tho said Butcher 4
Brother, and atteTward, for the benefit OF eaid
Butcher Brother, discounted by plat tis at their
Banking. ouse. in Cincinnati that there is due
the said plaintiffs from said Butcher Brother on
said draft, the sur1 of Five Thousasd Dollars, aud
in'erest from May Il 1861, and demanding iudg-
ment assinst said Butcher for said sum Of Five
Thousand Dollars with Interest aforesaid Aud
The said Butcher & cther are hereby required to
p'ead, answer demur to said petition or before
the 22d day of June, A u 1851, other wise Judgment
will he taken against them ~ demanded in said Pc
titiOn. NJ. "A. & W. TILDEH, for Pfaintiff5.
May l6, 1861 my2l-f ru
TNyHR STATE or OHIO. HtmILTON
4 COUNTY, IS Court OF Common Pleas -Eliz-
ebcth Benedict vs. William Benedict Petition for
DivoiCe-l No. 2, l,o42 1.-The said William Benedict,
of indianapolis, in the State of Indiana. is notified
that Elizaie eth Benedict did, on the lIth daY o
May, A ID 1861, file her petition in the office of the
Clerk Of said Court of Common Pleas, within and
for ERid c, unity of Hamilt and State uf Ohio,
charging the said William Benedict with having
been, and still continuing to- be guilty of gross me-
Elect ef duty husband of plaintiff sud asking
that she may be divorced r. I'm the said defendant,