New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1861-02-15
aarea. The following state men, appeared In The Ne i''


"pRov1Diys ! LIBRARY the SOUTHERN oosrrnsnsGs,
trated by seeding Members Of Congress- they nave
hon the boon Which obe
ei'rwtee OF the mos. valuable volumes IN i hycisJ
end sed Of BY he,s sSS bs A%Da more s h Of
dye,s of he most valuable character and which can never be
replaced Scarcely Of these gentlemen took the 20
Ps' ViI them Ssfeay packed and further Informed
ma , ,ns b6pb bs State to ecedc sn: up
aJ NJ coo worth Of books recently which under tho rules
D o. s. aim to hat webster define. therefore
Eod That Select Committee ,s Of Ihs Hd S :. t Ip
Conme have to send and PFer' Win
20 report At any time
The resolution was passed.
Mr.. STANTON rep, Ohio rose to question Of
privilege and called attention to the report OF Saur-
DAYS debate j. appeared in The Gl06f, saying hs
colleague, Mr.. Cox was herein represented az max
i,g reparks which were not uttered in this Hall.
Mr. COX DEM, Ohio explained that the only snb-
staniih correction OF his remarks made ut the
request of Mr.. GitdiDga successor, MI lintcDl9s'
That geutlemlp had asked him Mr.. Cox 70 allow him
10 iusert paragraph defending Mr. Giddings, and re-
ques,ng him 70 write one in reply.
Mr.. IlUTCHiNS rep. Ohio sad that was true.
Mr. STANTON said the condIc, Of Mr.. Coz was
matter of taslc Az for bmselI, he never touched tie
reporter notrs, nor did he indulge in anything beo ing
In the remotes, degree personal character. He was
reported ing to speech M which tins eAtror-
dinary paragraph appeared. /. placed Linn IN posluon
without reply. The specch that he S,anton responded
ln did not contain one word in that paragraph. Mr..
Gddiugs wonld not certainly choose him Tor his de-
fender llo lStantoD) did not agree with hlh ~ al ms
AntSlayeTy sentiments bat he accorded 10 HIM sih-
ceriiv, courage and zeal and he had heard Southern
men speak Of Mr. Giddingss integrity on all subjects
except about negroes. His colleague tAlr. COX nad
show an extraordinary iaste aud inclination IN raklnY
up Ohio qusrres, and Bringing their dirty inen here
and washing II in the Gre OF the House. He did not
chooe to arragn his colleague for this however strong
the temptation. An individual to make IN. name I'M
mortal, burnt the Temple of Ephe'ns, and II ls col
les e wished TO acquire an immortal historca name,
by tho course he had pursued be was welcome TO the
position.
Mr.. cox eaid H. came with bad grace from SIR.
Stanton 10 af rtign him under the prelense o. qucs'
ton Of privilege when from the beginning Of this Con-
gr,.ionnl term until now he had been pursued by his
oppopepts in personally yindicve style, wbieh has
no parallel in political campaigning. His colleague
had gone ont o his way to c0nr the favor oi the Abo-
llion wing. He lMr. Cox did attack Mr.. Giddings.
Ills colleague knew it, but that occasion he did not
see proper 10 reply TO il. lie wanted u ~ be remen-
hered that lis colleague Mr.. liutchns) Introduced
Ohio politics here, and also that his Mr. Coxs re-
mGrss about Mr. Giddings were IN response 10 Mt.
Gddingss successor and written at his request. Was
not this 20
Mr.. HUTCHINS said he desired bis colleague OR.
Cox 10 inert simJe paragraph about Mr. Giddings,
10 which he CMr. Ilu'chUs wond reply in the same
manner by wiring lie, however, did not zee bis coli
leagues reply. ~
Mr.. CO&.I mad e 10 yon before il was published.
SIR. HuTCHINS replied that bis colleague com
menced reading the reply but he did not stay I'll it
was all read.
Mr.. cox resumed, saying that be had no idea that
Mr. Stanton would dei, nd Mr.. Giddngs, his remarks
were ia reply to Sir. Hutehins. When hs colleague
Wr. Stantoni talked about dirty linen, he wished 1t
10 be understood that he r. Cox bad been the sub
iect Of extraordinary attacks here and ~ home MI.
Cddngs canseessly attacked him in the last Congress
Uis ssor be- yan the attack the other day have
tho defensive. alg0gs. and defended
myself from attack. i am ready 10 do II always.
stand by what l have said f1d written. Why don't
my colleague find fault with ms colleague Hulehlhs
for inserting his paragraph TO which mine was only
written at his request IN replyf My remarks Were
called forth by the questions concerning the report Of
the Committee OF Thirty three. They were intended TO
be- for the purpose OF uryng remedial legislation IL u
strange that the Republicans, while they aro 70 quick
to praise the Southern Union lMessrs. Etheridge
and Clement hul their mis.iles At Norffern-l nion
men who Democrais ii is because they prefer their
pla form 10 the Union.
Mr. WEBSTER Is. Am, Md roee TO n question Of
privilege concerning fugitive slave case 10 Car
ii-Ie, fonnsy lyHnia calling out Messr. STEVENS
f a3d f be fg ~ T Ssood WAS
oopdsFed until The expiration OF the morning hour.
The lIouse struck out, by % against OIL that part of
tto proposition that the nIa road shall 20 via Fort
Riley, from the month Of the kansas River.
The report OF the Committee u 1hirtythree came
M.
Mr. CAMPBELL Rep, Pa alluded to the pre-.
should look the danger in the face and at becomes
men. IF hose who have seized the forts srsenas and
other public property, surrendered them, he would
hear their eonp aints, and II well founded furnish the
measures Of redress. What reason have the enemies
# the Union 10 oppose the peaceful inauguration Of
Mr.. Lincoln who elected strictly according 10 the
Constitution. Though the vessel OF state was now
dashed about, pilot will presently be found. He
gued that government IL grand nation Of PEOPLE
and not Il States. j. IL supreme, and the hercsy Of
SecersDr make no impression reasonable mnds.
Secession IL rebellion. In he seeded States there
men trie to tho Government and who preserve their
all ance 10 the Union. Honor and humanity demand
ihty b, protected. Any other would sink the
Government to rerdition. Any Government not
protecting them from persecution, eonhscation,
and de4th, j. not worthy of that pane. There
are no grievances which cannot be redressed
In the Union. He willing TO do something for
Mar land Kentucky, Tennessee, and other States and
for loyal citizens ia Georgia aud Alabams who require
assistance. lie argued that Mr.. Cri,tenlen's prOposi
on in effect was condemned in the last Presidential
election by al overwhelming majority. in the lam
guage Of Clay, earthly power should induce him to
for SIerbc measure for the introduction OF STAY
cry where Il did not before exit whether south or
north of the parallel Of 70 30 The proposition Of
the Select Committee met his approval. lie was in
favor of the passage ~ the resolution recommending
the repeal of the Personal Liberty laws and OF the bill
aineuda;ory Of the Fugitive Slave act II was Ia the
power Of the Slave States 10 quiet this agitation by
abandoning extreme views giving up the Crittenden
MEASURE and other imposstillties, and combining on
the admission OF NewMexicO State in the Union
This would settle the chief question Of difficulty !
namely, that relating 20 the Territories. Should con-
.iatory measures here fail, he would advocate the
ceiling Of National Convention. At all events Penn
sylysna will stand by the Union as Il H.
Mr.. HOWARD rep Mich, from the Select Com |
mi;tee of Five made the following report, under the
resolution nstucting them to report as 10 the alleged
conspiracy:
The Committee entered upon the investigation, under
deep selso of the importance and the intrinsic diff
- he exist of A