The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1861-03-11

arrests have been made Of some Of the principal in
habtants who were supposed 70 be consprng against
the government and sending information the enemy,
and forming plans for the federas TO take the
capital
Soldiers have been constantly employed searching out
and arreetng all skukers from military duty, and all
the troops which in the capital have been des
patched TO hinder the enemy from entering thern,
ferrng to have the lighting take place outside The capt
tai Is literally besieged by small parties, who within
few miles distance ready to unite at q proper time
There has been great rejoicing At the capture Of Gene
habtants of Carabobo and who has hitherto dened all
tho expeditions sent after him. His trial will take place
Congress is still without quorum. Our Northern
friends should pass few months in this republic and
they would forever shut their mouths about slavery
Supreme Court or the United States.
SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES February 2s.-
On motion Of VIM. Curtis Noyes Esq., Charles f. Strong
Esq OF New York, was admitted an attorney and coun
No. lOl. The Board of Commissioners of Knox county
n. IN vs. o sn Ct a.
and by Mr. vnton for the defendants in
No lO2 Pierre A. Berthold ct al, plaintiffs in error,
v. Edward Goldsmith This cause was argued by Mr.
Blair for the plaintiffs in error and by Mr. Carlisle for the
defendant in error.
SUPREME COURT THE UNITED STATES, MARCH lon mo-
ton of Mr. Attorney General Stanton Hon John c. Burch
Of California and James Foster Esq OF Missouri, were
admitted attorneys and councillors Of this Court.
On motion Of Hon. Cushing, Charles W. futile, Esq,
OF admitted attorney and counsel
Tor OF this Court.
On motion Of Hon. Geo. F. Pugh, Jacob Butler, Esq, Of
Iowa, was admitted an attorney and counsellor of this
motion of J. NJ Carlisle Dwight May Esq, Of Mchi-
gan was admitted an attorney and counsellor Of this
No 1874 Arnold Midbury ct al, plaintiffs in error VS.
the State Of 0hoThe motion to dismiss this
by Mr.. PuRh in opposition thereto.
No. 9Z VIM e. Reddal plaintiff IN error, Va. VIM. H.
~ s motion to this fur
thereof and by Mr. Tyson and Mr. Mayer in opposition
No. 20. The United States appellants vs. Frederick
Billings ct a-This cause was argued by Mr.. Attorney
General Stanton for the appellants and by Mr. Reverdy
johnson and Mr.. Vinton for the appeleee
No. 20. The United States, appellants, vs.. Frederick
Billings ct al-Appeal from the District Court OF the
United States for the Southern district Of California
affirmed.
No. 1903. Watson Freeman, Marshal United States, &C.,
plaintiffs in error, w. Jabez G. Howe ct aL-The argu
ment of this by Mr. Parker for the
plaintiff In error.
March 4.-On motion Of Hon. Benjamin C. How
ard N Holmes, Esq Of New York, was admitted an
attorney and counsellor Of this court
March Son motion of Hon. =. Phillips, Hull Tanton,
Esq., Of New York, was admitted attorney and coun
On motion Of Hon. Samuel F. vinton, John A. Wills,
Eaq Of Pennsylvania, was admitted an attorney and
counsellor OF this court.
On motion Of Hon. r H. Gilet, Hon. Ira Harris and
Charles g. Myers and George Wolford, Esqs., OF New
York. we've admitted attorneys and councillors Of this
On motion OF Hon. benjamin G. Howard Calvin Walker
ES, Of New York, was admitted an attorney ana coun
sellor Of this court.
On motion OF Henry G. Hutchins, ESQ.,, Charles De-
monds. FlorentiDe w. Pelton and Hamilton b. Staples
Esqs Of Massachusetts, were admitted attorneys and
No. 50. George W. Day ct al plaintiffs in error vs.
VIM Washburn ct al In error to the Circuit Court of
the United States for the district Of Indiana Mr. Justice
'elon delivered the opinion Of the Court affirming the
judgment OF the said Circuit Court in this cause, with
costs.
No. Co., Lessee Of Robert w. Smith ct al plaintiff in
OF the United States for the district Of Maryland Mr.
Chief Justice fancy delivered the opinion Of the Court
Affirming the judgment Of the said Circuit Court In this
cause, with COSTS
No IS. Benjamin Phelps ct al plaintiffs in error vs.
the United States for the northern district of Illinois,
Mr.. Chief Justice fancy delivered the opinion Of the
Court affirming the Judgment Of the said Circuit Court in
this cause, with costs aud ten per cent damages.
No. 90 Jas H. Suydam plaintiff in error, Vs. William
H. Williamson This cause further submitted to the
consider alton Of the Court on printed argument by
Mr. Elingwood for the plaintiff in error.
No 103. Watson Freeman Marshal United States,
plaintiff in error, Jabez O. ct al. The argu-
plaintiff in error by Mr. Huchns for the defendants in
error, and concluded by Mr. Parker tor the plaintiff in
error.
MARCH 6-on motion of Hon. Thomas Ewing, Lorenzo
Sawyer, Esq, Of Illinois, VIM. ii. Armstrong Esq, of
Pennsy vana, and Andrew Lane Esq, of Connecticut,
were admitted attorneys and councillors of this court
On motion Of Hon r. H. Gillet, Clement ". Bennett
and Henry L. Knowles Esqs. of New York, admit
ted attorneys and counseors Of this court.
On motion Of Hon. NJ Blair, George s. Hale Esq. of
Was admitted an attorney and counsellor
OF this court.
Enright Appeal from the District Court Of the United
States for the Northern district of California On motion
Of Mr. Attorney General Stanton this appeal dis
No 221. The United States, appellants va Mariana
Castro-Appea from the District Court Of the United
States for the Northern district OF California On motion
Of Mr. Attorney General stanton this appeal dis
missed.
No so4. The United States, appellants w. Benjamin
t,t,,to T,ou Gal
the District Court Of the United States for the Southern
district Of California On motion OF Mr. Attorney Ge-
neral stanton this appeal was dismissed
No. &c. The City Of Carondelet plaintiff In error, Vs.
the City Of st. Lous-The argument Of this cause was
commenced by Mr.. Hill for the plaintiff in error, and
continued by Mr.. Blair for the defen ant in
Mr.. Attorney General Stanton then addressed
the Court folows:-May II please the Court,
ra have ra the pleasure o. presenting the Hon
qualified as my successor In the office OF Attorney
General of the United States. In taking leave, sir, OF
my official relation TO this court, beg 10 return my
sincere thanks for the kindness and attention that have
always been exhibited towards me, and express my
profound respect for yourself Mr. Chief Justice
associates and my earnest wish for the stability Of this
tribunal and for the health and happiness Of the Judges
whose wisdom and learning adorn it,
To which Mr.. Chief Justice fancy replied-The Court
thank you for the kind terms In which you have taken
leave ofthcm on your retirement from Office, add in
haye to or
Whereupon the Court ordered the commission appoint
ing the Hon. Edward Bates Attorney General of the
court, and TO be entered on its minutes
MARCH 7.-On motion of Hon. Thomas Ewing, James NJ
Ashley, Levi Geiger and f. p Bassett, Esqs., Of Ohio,
admitted attorneys and councillors Of this court
On motion Of Hon. j. f. Farnswsrth, +. s. Smith, Esq.
was admitted attorney and counsellor OF this court.
On motion of VIM. NJ. Evarts, Esq. 4 Dea6eld Smith,
Esq, admitted attorney and counsellor OF tets
court
No. l. VIM H. and Charles Belcher, plaintiffs In error,
Va. Vim. A. Linn and
No 81 WIN. H. and Charles Belcher plaintiffs in error,
va. VIM. A. Linn. The argument Of these causes was
commenced by Mr. Phillips for the plaintiffs In error, and
continued by Mr.. Stanton for the defendant in error.
MARCH s-prcsent, the Hon. Roger D. fancy. Chief
Justice; Hon. John Mclean, Hon. James N. Wayne,
Hon. John Catron Hon. samuel Nelson, Hon. Robert 9.
Grier, Hon. John A. Campbell, Hon. Nathan Clifford,
Associate Justices.
On motion OF Mr.. Carlisle, VIM. A. Maury, Esq, Of
Washington was admitted an attorney and counsellor OF
this court
ON motion Of Hon. Edwin ". Stanton, Henry Baldwin,
Eq, Of Washington admitted an attorney and couu-
sellor or this court.
on motion of Mr. Carlisle Rufus ?. Tapley, Esq., Of
Maine, admitted m attorney and counsellor OF this
court
No 3o7 Josoph O. and Henry A. willard plaintiffs In
naftrt