The Manchester journal. [volume] (Manchester, Vt.) 1861-current, 1861-06-18
Local Intenlgenc

4g eors4r Cgpt4 ua 90 Maa5ay mort.rs.
o. lo ias, garaui e aitammsat gla
arg apa only jary co t6e Term 80 ,ts, 4
,ls s,st EinlcA Casut1 Ils eas "a is.
a.ausas saasgng tas rap es, h Is eaanh
ssl steslhg as plsae % s-ra De Ega.naz
sr, 81 Manchester Tis ess ecapled m
Reiassiay noaa Iha 4rg found M trst.meay
sbi Is aa,iei ibe respal s. hfe z
rs ants. 81, Sailing q eeg Is las rnaiaias
ooaai. we're. aaer having neR reman3oA several
times, Gnaly discharged athsui reuderuta ,er-
diet NIB Han. States At,y, and II h.Fop-
ler far the State Miner Son. for respondent.
Wednesday aaernosn the case Of A. r. Gr4aam
=. ~ Is Stevens. was tried before the Cours---
This vas On action Il Assumpsit Cor the use anoe-
eupalion II farm in Winhall. The planua
claimed title under decd from the defendant
Bat the Supreme Court having decided q. the iasi
February Term that the writing on the sack q
tie deed operated a. defeasance and rcuiere3
the deed 70 the plaintiff a mortgage The Gear,
decided that the relation 81 landlord and tenant
did not exist between tie parties bot that ,be
plaintiff held the land ouly as security In the
payment If the sum and interest thereon. ehch
was mentioned IN the endorsement judgment
vas rendered Coz the defendant The Plaintiffs
ceptei to che decision e the Court and ne case
was passed 10 The supreme Court Butter 8
Wheeler, i. 4. Fowler. fer rllatiG Miner s
Son, for defendant
! The mex, case was that og N b Roberts Is.
/ Troy s Boston r, L Co. This was an action en-
the case, the pIaindH alleging that his colt vas
killed By defcndenis engine, ard that the Cam
pany having neglected 10 construct cattle guards
at the crossing over which the .olt passed on to
the track had made themselves liable The Cont
gave judgment for the plaintiff to which decision
the defendants excepted aud the case was ,,ten
to the Supreme Court. Mine, & son, for plan
tif. A. ? Lyman, for defendants.
The next case wosthntof lIspgood s Howardrs
William E Policy. This wasan acton on a nste
q 500, given to plaintiff in part for indebtedrfss
to them from the defendant AMI in part to sec,re
them for having become surete Cor defendanton
certain bank notes. 1t was CLAIMED by the sb-
sequeut attaching creditors of be defendant that
the plaintiffs prevented the oIcer, Who had it.
taehed defendants property, fem receiving their
writs, and also that the note ding joint that tle
plaintiffs could only recover forhe Joint liabilities
q The defendant to plaintiffs
After judgment the subsequent attaching ctel-
itors fled motion for new tial, on the grouad
Of the discovery Of new tcstimmy since the trial.
The Court entertained the motion and the jutg-
ment was set aside and the case continued. Iii
ner Son, for plaintiffs. Butler Wheeler, y.
B. Burton and H. K. Fowler, for subsequent It.
taching creditors
The Court adjourned sine die Thursday een-
ing. 1t was, on the whole, a brief but pleaan.
term The business was dispatched with prompt
ness and all concerned seem to have been well
statistical result which may beattributed amtng
other causes to the efficiency Of the new Cietk.
John Y. Hall. Esq, whose gentlepanly AMI en-
ergetie management Of the business exceeded ev
en- The expectation Of bis friends.