Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1861-12-27

Hon William v, Peck Hon. William Y. Gholsop, and
Hon Jacob BrnkerhoG, Judges L. ]. critchheld, Re-
norier
TUESDAY, Dec. "a, 1851.
.tI ysvp A., nocrvr p
AD " - a o.. :, =, No
No, ~, BaDcock ~ Oo' " 'ohn w. oahP e'' "'' Nv
served 10 Erie county.
BRMKERHoFF ]. held: ,,.,.,,.,,o.
J. Judgment OF court OF competent JuInucuon,
upon question necessarily involved ~ 'ne bu., ovn
elusive in subsequent SUIT petween ne wv pa,eo % ~
pending the same questions and 10 respect 70 ths
quality Of conclusive eject upon parties ana uo
DEGREES OF courts OF equity, upop mAIeIs "n 49,
jurisdiction, stand on the same iootng WIN Juusmen
at law ...,..,
The general rule that In order 10 make !uugmen'
at law conclusive between the same PARTIES " nvu P
vies In tne maI Gu. ~ Gs uS
puted in the subsequent suit must have been put directly
In Issue by the pead1ngs IN tne no ProPe1
plication where ne nrst suit was IN te
OF an account between numerous paruss occupying vaI
Gus relations TO each oher, ana inc y, mauy
and complicated claims between nsm, ano IN wnSn
OF the claims Of the parties respecuvey must oI neces
sty be made and contested orally before tne anu
on argumento OF exceptions 70 nus anu "ne,e
IL Is apparent, from the Wnoie IecoIu OF tne nis' su
that the matter In dispute 10 tne subsequent sut ngnl
have been contested and must nave Deen Pssssu upon
the court In the hrst the parties are concuueu ny ne
former Adjudication .,. -.
talned, and petition dismissed. ,o,
:; hoily d. VaV,n e a. u aIe e'S'o '" 0"o' W
District Oourt OF broWh oouhV'
PECK, j., o...,
In an action on recongzance FORFEITED IN 'he oouf'
OF Common pleas1held
ISL That tne ming OF an answer Hnu Amenueu
tenosiing sunuIy lssuss " Pais W VIZ eds =. ~
ton, Is waiver OF demurrer previously nled 10 tne
whole cause Of aenop ana tnat noL stIUt' u, sSIn %
case, 10 send 'ne ISSUES Ut iao' W July "N'u '' '
sn naro esmonv IA not admissible in such ac
ton, to contradict the record OF FORFEITURE,
3D. That the record OF forfeiture cannot be mpeached
for frauds by the suretes, n the action brought 10 en-
force 1t. s-
4th. That verdict in such action 'for tho amount
due on the bond not excepted 70 az the time nor msde
the basis Of motion for new al or in arrest OF judg
ment will be held sufficient On error.
Judgment affirmed.
No. 81, Daniel 3. Owen o. james Purdy et' al he
servedin the District Court ofRchland County.
GHoLsoN, j., Held
The act Of 18th February, 1874 relating to the BANK OF
Wooster, e Curwen lOl9 provides that upon the assent
OF each and all OF the stockholders py WIien aeoaIa
ton filed with the Auditor Of State to the individual liza
biy mentioned in the second eecuon OF tne act tnen
the Bank should enjoy all the rgnw and privileges org
naly granted, iree from SeInh mes ,S %ws wnich
garded as an amendment 10 tne OF tne bank OF
Wooster offered to the stockholders for their acceptance
In prescribed mode and tnat anougn tne pleserDed
mode De not pursued soe Vi tne nut VII
ting in the written declaration yet II the Bank proceeds
to exercise and enjoy the piiyneges ana lmmunes Sc
cured BY the amendment neinerit nor suon stock
holders as are consenung Inee,o. san ueny ne eTePI
ance OF Huch amendment aS against INC cams Vi 'iru
persons -.,.,..,.s
demurrer 70 tnepeuuon oVerluleu,
and others. Owl acuon' reserved IN Oiermoh' DIE
trct Court.
soTLHI, D.
be by him sold under one year for the OF GER
tain creditors named IN the deed and IN case tne grant
or pad tns debts % DO reconveyea 70 num-
nss ne sAo .S ~ aS on srnra;s.I h
some one Oh tne elso.os I'M naMeu' me anu 'n NJ a ~
tnfee men, 70 PC seiec.ea Uy s me- ine 80 es'y De
puIo On ne sOr sbsr aa,ss S,ea iutss
M oS ons 81 bs CREATORS named in ne
5a.d ~ G aSo1nist,or n, r. in 1897 3ied his netrion
aeed, anu nj Ui @ Se sais ~ ss,S IanS"
IA IN az az. ~, ,ta - n nar,;ng Iba heir NJ n and
sss;ns that thew might he made defendants and the
asking tnat lney en W TSe oo,rt annn,n,sd ~ IT
I'd H. oS the heirs Of B. infants bv whom
= - ar ~ a. onsvar and thyao corroi isaior.
they made and ea ne ana ana
eIs ouy anu ~, % ordaaS % nh,;
y, VIC anSsS nu S "a aas hn ,ha adpSnis
notcei hosoe was snet ss ~ anS "a vaS ~ ~ tha conrt
anu aSs ~ n1rcbssers n 1900 sSe,
h;oh erecrtea -sisass deeds IN the nurchasers re-
whlca d. eAscs!eu m asn aslease M io Ssd hr ths
Sss y, = anr - ~ ,SSs; az r ana ,,s nj, rchs,,ys
1e neis ra,'at ~ ~, Hsid asa.o' " ' '' Wv
~, NJ. ~. 80. sts - .hov, . a,s,.,a,d 10 tho
~. t1as s,.s VIC laws .h . ~ oonss,,rt,ra 49,,
M uuue' - " .sa Ss'' va WV F"'' " -
Ga That he law os 1904 under which the proceedinus
~u' la uie 10" =, e hsS 10, nssscrih;n1
Oh lne M @ a., ssS WIZ "or d rch @
@ eiin. ue hIn W h,ors ne ststn,a been Sa T1rs IL
~. ,hs .o,,rt 81 Sra.t ana ,hst m an
nss,sucs and anSwer made by their guardian d ts a
PesIanse az s az go T., az .sss S~as rassonshIe snd
poan.eu "a ~ ~ ndsr thot s,strts N''
proper moue unue, sHt ss, =, a., tbs lana ,ro.
estate within the meaning Of the statute Of 1924
rear ,n ey.ate "lInin w. VIZ ~ = .ttrt. u, Wv y
| Ano pa,.pN Iutg.S .SS s;.nsssss ~ Vs,s sNNe' '-
wv o05 TahT niu ~ Ero. Uontinu Aduini,tra. .
No SO' pinnsv ' dscssssd E1Tar 10 tbs snnerior
tor Of a. H. Inney, ueceSSea A'rOi W "' 'up''O'
scorT n II Held
SCOTT, .. ~, rooo,dsd an oste, tbe death NJ
Inat morsag, nVs ,' n
tne mVtgasoI, nUs; aSsa,.c.s ~, - tbs s.tsss
agsnss tns genI ph"n ~ n a. Rsn oa9 ,nr,oved
.I.1un" u N''' p ' NHf
NI JSaOent ,erayssa demurrer to petton sustained
yuugnens iIS neHStsS' usNA"Ns W P'""o- 'NN'
AnH PesanVn ae ar n,asor al .I Thomss Rwino
NO. ~ veois y. ~ i,~, Can. a, prnvn co,,nt1
'ii, Ssa srSss NJ n, r,bsr ranort will he made
Of tbis case
ssarnorr a Mictsv ReseySed In RichIand county, -
anS~sy ovs,rnIed And case rsmanSeS The
case ia decided BY Seymour Ss Co. " Leyman Mickey,
~ ~ W vnio o.' "eP' ~ Nv 'NfN - N
Oh sne case ~ % s,.,s s ,s, M,cba D,actors os west
1a,O s.i.i School nistrict IN Adams SANITY Man
S pasaryed in Adams county Remanded To the
District there being only an issue Of fact discos
ed by the pleadng and the evidence not being shown
r; NO.. no; 70; coI,ss nss ., Wood conntv4
SrToTT Where halfway sixty feet In width
stream water, and bridge twelve
ts d along the center Of such highway
evs M and nrnnyiator n adioinn0 ands con
over n 1 re Iimifs of he roaa in;yaydIv
and along tbs bank Of the stream to the brdge-Hed:
That snch fences are DTftrd fdoie at least obstruc
s;ou. - tbo hIohuau and dutv the
of me proper district on due notice and do
1 nv DAMAGE to remove them and for 90
on ~ an scton fof trespass will NOT lie sgsInst him
u01rS InSsrnsnt ru NJ osSa SsSrmed n, a. -
No IA. LITTLE Miami Railroad Co. v. John Allen
IN H,sor Reserved in the District Court al Greene
~ n.Ioi'
eopny, pt, ". cor,~
mn E a. ~ Hons. " FIIiott Ohio ST. lg7 was de-
dJ W the yncnie that the code repealed the act OF
G!osa % On 'ps nd ,n,hed M mode of reexaininT
~ mnIen, lo.s' snu o,,. oSerrnijno motion for new
me 1round that the verdict was against the
wssSt ~ eydence The court n that case did not re