Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1861-12-17

Mr.. FLeCKNoY, Of Halifax - ,cce:vrd d lot
ter on yesterday irom : r.r,.hur o. Ills Con.
yention Mir. ALLEN Q. l~Auuosn, Of berkeley
in which be expresses n desire That ;lu Con.
~vention would GLOW him to change nis Ypts on
The ordinance CT secession from tho negative ~
the affirmative.
The PREsIDESr.-His letter can be- placed
upon the journal.
MI. FLouRSor.-I would do so wcro it not
tha. it refers to other matters besides that.
The PREslDEST.-Ihe leave may DO cntorcd
without the vote being changed, und when te
returns be can sign the ordnance
The Convention so ordered.
The consideration OF the ordinance to pro-
vent the sacrifice of property vas then re-
sumed.
The pending question was upon the amend
ment offered by (Mr. WIcEHAX,) which was 70
strike out the TWO last words without lien"
10 the third section aud iDsert the following in
lieu theres!:
"Bu. The ss!d execution shall irrsln is hu-
rhority .! lien Lulll otherwise provided by
law"
Mr.. HALL. Of Marion.-i lDove Ia amend tho
amendment By inserting the following after
the word shall" in the 9Th lrc: ":Fon
the debtors executing a bond IL ."a i.rH
according 10 lsw, with good security condition
for the forthcoming of the property ~iisn this
ordinance shall cease 10 DO in force 10 ,e-
stored 70 the debtor, &c.
Mr.. eAPFKros.-l imagine VT had better
dispose Of this question rs rapidly a. possible.
and in order to do that, | moYv tho prcyious
question.
The motion was sustained and the main
,,aet;on bein0 nut which was unon the
daanJmant ~ Ibo o~nenIncr, oR.rsI j., M
ILL - rsa decided in The negative
~ question than racurred DHon Inc adam
oouandren rfr.,ad tv NE W.
u,uN md !, rae REACTED
w. WTcvu,y-i NOV. 10 amend N. third
eec,inn by etrikino ont tho vo,ds "vonld has
becu ia yalu." in the C,H;;h Inc, and insert
ing trc word, H.: voul! haze broura, 81 q
cho,-;t;"c s.:,u
Tn. nri.,t nri:y II -ir-..y is. toe-.jye at vta,
would have been ito srnaua. received hy n.
iod;vil,,l uhos, r,,n.rry mag no rnd.r or.
cnt,on If il bad l,.cn so,I on the 9Th t.r &c
Noyonher lsst
w. Cu.ypI ask G,r . 5;y;..o, n ~.
oro.,ioo
r. n,,..;o, g arot ,,no,, e.r;Li,c
49, 1o,a b.ain, beor, ,sL.r =, .t,s br.,c b
If ~. svhiecr !, uaa &, cij,d in tho np,s-
t:ra
"r I'll. ;.,a ,hor,.
lno a,is'u"ittc VI, ~ ~ s.ou'u, !. ~"
'Intoi aas.ns rsuSu ..h
AZ AZ = wac "ma..,,o o-d,oo
MT opiED:-A propose 10 su'eno tne 0.o sec'
uon oy s,''A'os ou' 'He tss' u" "otu'' VIII"
OUT teu
| VIII STATE tnat II seeu's " u.o III WIFI
'ho clea''oi nieAes d I1sa! LII ~ P'o~".t -
payment OF ns oeos .te' ne pus"' 80 -
pi"cet ID q worse Posl'!o' al 'ne 't' ni:..": y" u
lhe eho.t lna9 ne was Iu'..s ~ F''s..'s !"
Se'lns ~ Ie' ~ ue snou . ran ~ e. W. pG-
meht OF MS oeoI aiter he !as ea'suH'sd t"c
remedy "n'cn ING law PFoTiueo io' ",iL;' '"a'
Is chances OF paymen' 'usn' ho'' on ''at DIT,
count, DC ui.n'nisneo: l"is Sce:''i caves
h'u without ''rn oy us execution 10 any iVim'
lalls IN the enort lha' nc nss ~ view.
The question having been taken BY a count,
resu!ted-ayes ~, noes %.
SO the Amendment was rejected.
Mr.. sc1TT, OF tauquier.-l looked not win
a great deal OF care, INTO DOM VI inc pToeg"'
and | regret TO say that neither Of them are, at
present, ID a ondlt!on IN which they ought 10
receive the sanction OF Ems Convention.
/: IA n very d!hruit tang To prepare nm Of
dlnsnce OF thls Character. lhey- require a
great deal OF care, much more than thlnk has
been e1penoeo upon 'nese.
AS unoerstano tneio' oo'n contain Prov
sions proaloiInS lGe issuins :: e1scauoos
ReneraiiJ.
Now, II geftlemeb Will Tecuc 10 chapter ~
OF The Ccoe OF Virginia they WI! hnd thai thai
cnap,er contains provisions ior me enforcement
OF of'.s uGe u 'ne oehinon"esIc ! 10 NOT
.n!"H '.e ~ - = Sonu''Ion ~"
- 'aiu soy @"t H. Wv i'.'eo.ne
iroin iecoYeilus ueo's w W iIL' ne' 'ieA-
SUI? Is rather LOO empty iof such process Us
that; and, tnink, IN the preparation Of any
stay law, care sneu!d De taken to eAem Pt It's
operation 10 respect 10 oeols que 10 the Com
mon"eaiin. GosP!er lei oitne Coae PROVIDES,
among otnef tninss, Tor executions against
corporatlons' | 90 not well see why they
snon!o DC suspended: lnat chapter also pro
Woes ior executions ior inc recovery OF speclbc
property. laAes Tue morse OF d; b sues MIN,
gets Judgment anu surely ne ought not 10 be
stayeu IL 'ne process 10 recover PACK property
taas hau oee" ~"ro'S'a,iy 'shen from "aln.-
Ano le! Hr pIo'!s'Ml hcie taxes QUIZ t"c
C'c'o''o'" = n'"e"c eAeeu''ona ,"' 'hs
"eu''' " '"''onS 'of spe''No pro-
perry:
MAJ taxes sho'nel d iano' the o"her suss num-
ana gers judgment lot TIE Ianu' Why prom,
DIT h:ni ITO" ssii''ns possession OF Inc lano
wnicn was onJnstiy taken ~ another And
there are csses Where process OF execution
goes against noii'resloents' or those who are
not CITIZENS OF tho commonwealth. Why pro
tcct their property! Why stay the hands Of
your own clt'zen IN nIs recovery U' 4 debt cue
oy ono VINO is not citIZ: I'll; and yet neither OIL
these ProtegH makes any pFo7lsi"n N that
case! When you propose to continue ttie liza
eilities Of surelies-in Last, to make new con-
tracts l3r tnem-i think SI''e p~fovis'"" ought
10 NC mace, SO as 70 unable *ursties' VINO DE-
sire fei'ei, 10 seek 'her trei; o~t!er"'se, II