Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1861-03-26

H.B. 3sl; By Mf. CI,APP To preyerb the
use q Of csnphssnS Y a'1uFnlng fuid-f waS seada
! On motion Of Mr.. FhAGc, 1t Mas asaendsl
by striking out The provision melIing ~ mah-
slaughter to sell camphene, when death shail
result. t-1p
Mr. FLA &c advOcated she passage Of the
bill, and pointed out the ssrious consequences Of
ia use. I'm HfNfS AfIT F4H
.Nrs HERRICK thodght IL was unneeesaary
to pass such bill, as the good sense of the
community would regulate the matter; and no
thought wetmight with safety rely upon the in
PRODUCTION Of coal and rock oil for It's final ex
tiPpation.
The vote was then called on the passage of
the bill, whbh resulted7-yeas 30, nsys48.
H.B 32l--By Mr.. HITCHCOCK--To pro.
vide for removing distractions aud improving
the channels of rivers for che purpose OF drain
ing marshy or low lands in this State--was read
third time, when icS A.i HllA bnli liFllfi
Mr.. HITCHCOCK stated the object Of the
bill, which is to provide for the improvement of
alaIge amount Of swamp lands on the Cuyahoga
River. Wt-4s feFasta' en"'N
Mr.. STEDMAN explained that the draining
OF this land might ipjuriously affect the water
power at the village of Hiram, in Portage coun.
ty, though he was not Abeto state exactly about
litgi
. Mr.. VINCENT moved that the bill be laid
on the table, which motion was disagreed to.
Mr.. VINCENT objected to the bill, as IL had
been changed from general TO a local measure
since it wac introduced.
Mr.. BLAKESLEE explained the circum
stances connected with the locality, in favor ol
the bill.
Mr.. ROBINSON explained that though the
bill is changed to local, its general features
80 far as respects The adjoining country, had beer
retained.
Mr.. sTEOMAN moved that the bill be
referred to a select committee OF one
Mr.. CLAPP advocated The bill, as, from hit
knowledge of the locality, he was certain i
would promote the health Of large portion oi
the country. ,......
Mr. HILLS suggested that the committee be
made up of the Representatives of Summit, Por
tage, Cuyahoga and geauga counties
Mr. ROBINSON moved the previous cues
tion, which was sustained, when
The vote was called on the passage of tht
bill, which resulted-.y cas- 65, nays l6.
Il H. B. No. 40l; BY Mr. Hills--To amend loi
act entitled an act to regulate the fees Of clerk
Of the courts of common pleas, passed Nay lst
u 1854, and to repeal section six of said act--wa
} read third time, when
Mr.. McCLUNG explained that the bill wa
TO require the county officers to pay Tor al
blanks and stationery used in cases where the
have specific fees. J~til ~ fr'-'sl-li T.
Mr.. BROWNE, of Miami, opposed the bill
as 1t would afford no material saving, while
would materially disturb the public business
Mr. HUGHES moved that the House take
recess, which was agreed to.
Mr. HILLS said the Law at the present tim
does not provide for the furnishing Of blanks I
county officers except the CLERK, and only sto
tionery fer that Office, that a great abuse ha
grown up, by which blanks are supplied, that b
would cut off by this bill.
Mr. SCOTT, Of Warren, ssid that as the bi
: had been changed since it was first introduced
he moved that it be laid on the table an
printed
The House then took recess.