The weekly pioneer and Democrat. [volume] (Saint Paul, Minn. Territory) 1855-1865, 1861-12-06

/ "
The following is list of the causes:
l. Vetal Guerp, appellant, agst Henry w
| Hunt, ct al, respondent. b Brisbin, Atty
for appellant, ii Ames and Sanbora d Lund
| for respondent.
2. Henry Zimmerman, appellant, aget Jas.
| Lamb. ct AL, respondent. q Chatfield At
tOrney for appellant, Paulding Austin for
1 respondent.
3. Herman, Aiken l. Gale, respondents, agst
Schalk b Fenske, appellants. Thomas COwan
Attorney tor respondents, Cox d Bryant for
appellants.
| 4. Christopher Carli, respondent, agst w Fl
| G Folsom, appellant. Thompson d Brisbin,
| Attorneys for respondent, w ID Burt for appel
| liant.
S. Lorin Fletcher, espondent, agst Henry A
Swift, appellant. Cornell & Mann. Att'ys Tor
respondent, Chatfield 4 Buell. tor appellant
e. Albert Baze, plaintiff in error, agst u
! Aaper, defendant IN error. 6llis d Peckham
Attys for plaintiff, Sanborn 4 Lund for defen-
| dant.
Z. Godfried Schmidt plaintiff in error. agst
johnson Coulter, defendant in error. SanbOrn
u Lund Att'ys tor plaintiff, Smith i Gilman
| for defendant.
| 8, VIM M Sherwood, appellant, agst Cynthia
A Frazer, ct al, respondent. N u h
Brown Atty's for appellant, Henry Kinds tor
| respondent.
| 3. Cynthia A Frazer, ct al, plaintiff in error,
agst VIM Sherwood. defendant in error
Henry Kinds Atty for plaintiff, l. III II
Brown tor defendant.
| 10. Joseph B Wykoff, plaintiff in error, agst
| Irvine, Stone Mccormick, defendants in err
| rOr. Sanborn Il Lund Att'ys for plaintiff,
Cooper and CrOwell for defendants.
IL. Wells d Low, plaintiffs in error, against
| Henry Masterson. defendant in error. SAN
born Lund Att'ys for plaintiffs, Masterson &
| SimOns Tor defendant.
IL. Lovejoy, Brockway, ct al, respondents.
4 QfGf ii ID oil nfo A.rrtfh
Gilman Att'ys for respondents, Cooper & Cor
nell for appellants.
Is. Merrman Il Grace, respondents, agst
Nash d McGrorty, appellants. smith & Gil.
| man Att'ys for respondents, Brisbin for
| appellants.
IA. Ruggles, Nourse. Mason 4 Co., plaintiffs
in error, agst Shanwick & Duffsy, defendants
| in errer. John d Brown ATTY for plaintiff,
Henry Kinds for defendant.
10. Adelia B True, appellant against Gin
ton True, respondents. Curtis 4 Houston
Attorney for appellants, Thompson for re-
! spondent.
Is. John Gronti, respondent against The Els.
! tate of John Columbus appellant. w H Burt
Attorney for respondent Gold T. Curtis for
|! appellant.
IL. Samuel Merritt, respondent against H
T Putnam, appellant. Sanford b Beveridge
Attorneys for respondent. Gold L Curtis tor
| appellant.
l8. J X Gardner, respondent, against Archi.
bald Mcclure appellant. Horace Austin At
torney for respondent. Chattield and Buell. for
| appellant.
Is. Edward wainwright, respondent, against
Joseph Arnold, appellant. Cox d Bevant
| and II Austin Attorneys for respondent Chat.
| field Il Buell. for appellants.
| 20. State eX re. Andrew Swenson respond
ent, against Oscar Ross, Register of Deeds, ap.
pellant. l. r German, Attorney for respondent,
| Fl urt for appellant.
4 n,rrn
Martin o Walker appellant. Batchelder Il
Buckham Attorneys Tor respondent Cole 4
Case for appellant.
%. o Turrill, plaintiff in error, against Ca
| leb Morgan, defendant in error. Allls Il Peck.
ham Attorneys for plaintiff. Il r BigelOw for
defendant.
%. Caleb Morgan respondent, against VIM
| G Thompson appellant BigelOw, Attor-
| ney for respondent. w Thompson for APP
| pellant.
"a. John O'Connell plaintiff in error, against
State of Minnesota, defendant in error. 4
Hartley Attorney for plaintiff, Attorney Gener-
| al for State.
25. A II Pross, respondent, against Patrick
Mash ct al, appellants. j Brisbn Attorney
| for respondent. Smith & Gilman for appellants
| 26. A Fl Pross appellant against Catharine
Dahl ct al. respondent. j Brisbn Attorney
for appellant. Horn Galnsha for respon'
! deut.
| q. s Il II Shaubhust, respondent against
| G w Lay ct al, appellants. Wilkinson & Burt
| Attorneys for respondent, Willard d Barney
| for appellants.
%. C Ramsey appellant, against Charles
Merrman ct al, respondents. Brlsbln Mas
terson Attorneys for appellant. Horn Galu-
| sha and Allis & Peckham for respondents.
| 20. Roger Agin, plaintiff in error, against
Maria 7 Hayward, defendant in error. Smith
81 Gilman Attorneys for plaintiff, Van Etten d
Officer tor. defendants.
| 80. John l. Thorn, appellant, agst Washing.
| ton County. respondent. Thomas q Brlsbln,
Attorneys for appellant. l. German for re-
| spondent.
81 Lovejoy Brockwsy ct al, respondents,
agst D Morrison Il Co, appellants. Smith 4
Gilman, Attorneys for respondents. Cornell
| Il Cooper for Defendants.
80. Robert Whitacre, respondent, agst Geo
Culver, appellant. Smith & Gilman, Attor-
news for respondent. Horn l. Galusha for ap.
| pellant.
SO. Patrick krough agst Martin McNi.t.
81. VIM Fowler, ct al, appellant, agst John
Atkinson, respondent. Newell, Attorney for
/ appellant, l. e Thompson for respondent.
IS. Warren Carpenter, ct al, plaintiffs in
error, agst George Geolach, defendant in error.
M Lamprey, Attorney fer plaintiff, Allis Il
Peckham for defendant.
SO. S Lockwood, respondent, sgst p
Folsom, ct al appelTanst. Horn & Galusha.
Attorneys tor respondent, B Brsbin tor ap.
pelant.
81. R Il Bingham, appellant, sgst the Coun-
ty of WinOna, respondent, Sergeant Frank
lin, Attorneys for appellant, William II Yale
for respondent.
3s. George Hurley, respondent, agst Thos f
Bennett, ct al, appellants. Berry Il Waterman
and Norton Il Mitchell Attorneys for respond.
ent, Sergeant & Franklin for appellant.
80. Andrew NJ Haines, respondent, agst Lo-
renzo Selfridge, appellant. Van Etten 4
Officer Attorneys for respondent, Norton d
Mitchell tor appellant.
40. William II Strong. respondent, agst R M
Foster, ct al, appellant Ripley, Wells Ca
vanaugh, Attorneys for respondent, Norton &
Mitchell for appellant.
Al. James Scott, appellant, agst l. 3 King,
respondent. Sergeant & Franklin and Berry q
Waterman, Attorneys for appellant, Norton
Mitchell for respondent
AZ. William CRUDE. respondent, agst Etna
Insurance Co, appellant. Horn & Gausha At
torneys for respondent, Van Etten Officer
for appellant
43. s G Edes, respondent, agst VIM l. Ban.
ming, ct al, appellants. George d E A Otis,
Attorneys for respondent, and Horn d Galusha
for appellants.
A. j Warden & Son. respondents, agst D
W c Dunweli, ct al, appellants. Sanborn d
Lund, Attorneys for respondents, and Master
E VnnhA HAr0