Cleveland morning leader. [volume] (Cleveland [Ohio]) 1854-1865, 1861-07-25
mY29:u25

----7 OHR0I,INE EESiEEBRENNER,
my2o:Us5 By Pierre A, Collier, her Atty.
Ann Louise Allen, by
Uus Nose, ~ Rodney Court Of Common Picas,
q Mathews, oaihsrioe Cu5ahnsa County.
HlHE SAID RODREY 81. MATHEWS
and Oathcrins + Oakley, who are non-residents
Of the state Of 0hi9, are bed that the said plain
her sstifion against them aud SAMUEL Mathews, q
resident the county OF Lake IN the state of Ohio
and Others stating in su sfanci that on the y day
of AuGust 1851, she fled in said Court her petition
Against he said Rodney h. MatheA s. Wh9se wife
she then was, praying e be divorced IRON him Tor
the cause Of adultery with one Lucinda Miillsi ana
That aid Court, At the Noyemher term thereoi
1885, ordered the said Rodney Do pay her $50 ali
mOny pending suit, and that at the February term
then OF 1873 said cause was tried and decree enter
Cd anuullina said marriage and sranling her alimo-
ny againrt the said Rodney in the sun Of 20oO tn
edition to the said sum Of 80, which sumo were "
said decree made cheEss nson the real estate q me
IN this cass fIr her ates that TIA "A kodDey' al
tsr rthe ming Of said petition for divorce, 70 pre-
vent the collection OF such reasonable ahmony as
the Court should decree 70 her, the trial q said
cause, without considers tion, pretended 10 convey
ing described real estate situate IN sad county, 10
the said Samuel Mathews, 70 wit: known a. being
part Of original lot No. 81 in the CITY Of Cleveland
bounded IS follows: beginning on the northeast cor
ner OF said lot the s0uthery line Of the Public
square; running thence sOuthery With the oasterli
line Of said lOl 70 Uhenpan street, themes westei y
with the northerly hreoi ham plain street bt ieeti
thence ncrtherty at right ANGLES VIII ynAinpl plaln
street to the Public Square thence easterly with thc
Public sQuars q feet 70 the place OF beginning Al
So that the said samuel Mathews receiyed sid deed
for lie sole purpose Of aiding the said kodnsy in
placing his Interest in said premises bey0ud the
reach OF the plaintiff and to dsfrand her
SAID petition further 5tases that during the pen
ency 6f said petition o- divorce the said samuel,
AZ the request Of the said Kidney, and for The pur-
nose Of more ctualy placing said promises beyond
me reach ofaaid deere for alimony, mortgAee The
aid resi estate to the said katherine T. oakley,
Who. said petition alleges, had notice Of the fraudu
! Tent Intentions Of the said Rodney and samuel
The prayer Of said petition %. that the said Quit
Claim Deed, from the said Rodney to the said sam
usl Be aside IS fTaudulenti that said mortgage,
Hound to have been received in good isfh, Be- post
pcned to the said decree % the paint and that the
said premises conveJed % SAID Samuel, b sold By
ordar oi said C0urt; and that the proceeds Of said
sails Be appied-lBt,t 70 the payment OF the amount
dre on said decree and eosts 30 entered u s7OF Of
the plaintiff and that the residue abide the order Of
said Ooilf
The SAID Rodney II. Mathews and Catherine y.
Oakley are also notifed that they are required to
ansEsr said petition or before the 3lgt day oi Au
gust, 1861. s..a ----. q. j. AAfkLL,
iunel7s3f7 Attorney for Plaintiff