Cincinnati daily press. [volume] (Cincinnati [Ohio]) 1860-1862, 1861-10-29
LEGAL.

EENHaE STATE OF OHIO, HAMILTON
III ogUHTY ssThe SnPeriioG QOGt t, Of % 0iRcH- IN
Hugbs and wilson T. Drake, PsftneTs, ST as 1 Evans
Co., plaintiffs, versus Washington butcher and
fendents, and Anthony Bul lock and Morris Dram,
Garnishees. The said defendants, Butcher Broth.
D. 1861, the said plaintiffs filed their petition In
said COURT, alleging thereiu that on the 9th day
certain bill Of exchange for the sum Of 6Oo. and
Endorsed and directed the same to the said Butcher
q Brother, by whom the same was duly accepted
that afterwerd, at the request and for the benefit
9f the said BUTCHER 4 Brother the same was duly
house in Clncnnati that there is due these plain
Of s. 69 ard interest % om May 1851 6G and ths
said defendants are notified that the said Morris
garnshees in said action. Defendants are required
TO plead answer or demur to said petition on or
wise, judgment will be rendered against them and
the property or credits of the said Butcher &
oc2I.fTh NJ. H. & W. TiLBEN, for Plaintiffs
State OFOHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY,
Ethan S. Bates vs. Sol D. Kempton, Will am Long.
street. JaReS s. KemPt9onV 9 WIFI st al The Defendants
the said Ethan s. Bates Hled his petition in the said
made by said james Kenpton to the plaintiff, on
that tract Of land in said county, in section 26,
ami Purchase, particularly described in said mort
gage and ia said petition, and which mortgage is
in Book No 24s, page 466 The said defendants are
s9Sir9f G to aPpSsT ana NJ on or before res
S9tS5 viii pc tAFep ts nd tsG prayer thereof
Cincinnati, October IA, 1861 ocl7-f"Wy
EHHOpAs HQsTON, JESSE WILCOX,
D Jchn b. Vail Joshua Bates and Edward q. Neal
will take office that William II, Taylor did, the
Tior court of CINCINNATI, against them and othors
as defendants, wherein he alet ed that be is the
sion Of Lots Nos 81 and q in Morsos sutdSsion
in Cincinnati, Ohio, each fr9ntir IS feet and that
taid defendants unlawfully keep him out of posses.
sion thereof aud thereuPon he asks Judgment
agsnst said defendants for the recovery OF the pes
nGe haa unless - they "a oE d%u tb sdt e SAID PEI
se26.fWy Attorney for Plaintiff.
WILLIAM SIcMURPHY,, JANE HEL-
will take notice that William II Taylor filed his
petition IN the Court Of Common Pleas, of Hamilton
County, Ohio, Rk aiAst them aud others as dete nd
az ts, the 5tb day of September 1851 wherein he
ana was entitled TO- the session Of Tot No. Is, IN
the town Of Elizaleth Delhi Township Hamiltoua
County, Ohio, and that he was uulawfuily kept out
of pcsse sion thereof by said defendants aud there
upon asked Judgment against said defendants for
fendaDts are, therefore, notified, that unless tGey
answer or demur to said petition on or before SAT.
ment viii be taken AGAINST them upon default
WARNER NJ. BATEMAa,
se26.fWy Attorney for Plaintiff.
HkASEEESG&A2GEs guSCe TREFGSE Il t5s Fsaee g e. o E.
ein9ati Township, Hamilton Oouny, .ohlo.|F;
September, 1851, said Justice issued an order Of
attachment against the property OF said defendant
for the gum Of Sl67 and said cause is set for hear
ing on the 18th day OF November st 1'SlSck AZ A
Cincinnati, October 7, 1851. OOS-o'
ENIlIZABETH ALB1NIA BIER ANGER
H Plant Fl, against Matthias Beranger, Defend
an 6u the fsai 18Th ais dsS septe%5SS D. sS s hS
petition In the once Of the CLERK of the Court Of
| Common Pleas In Hamilton County, State Of Ohio,
Wiful absence for more than three years last past
Sofce So% Said Petton viii ssud or hesrSs after
the lapse Of six weeks after the date Of this pub
ELIZABETH ALBINIA BERANGER.
| BY JoHs j. GAssER, her Attorney.
Dated the 2lat da5 OF septembsr, 1851. se2l-tSe
n INR, HANLY g. KRORL vs.. ZIM-
II MkhhAN q GALLUP, Partners, etc. The
defendlnts will take notice that, on the 27th day Of
April, 1851, PLANTING tled In the office OF the Su-
periOr Court OF Cincinnati petition against them,
ants to piaiats, Tor the sum Of S5SS 81, due Feb.
ruery 3, 1851 and that an atyaehment issued IN
thirty three barrels Of peach brandy, the property
| Of defendants.
Defendants are required 70 answer by the 18th
| day Of December, 1861. JOHN w. HERRQN,
oc5fsat Attorney for Plaintins
CsTATE OF OHIO, HAaIILTON OOMMON
> PLEAS, -lNo. 2l, ,942 L Divorce. = hltzabeth
Benedict vs. William Benedict. Tho said defendant
IL hereby notified that depositions Will be taken in
the above action on the part Of plaintiff, at the Of
fce, ofM u; wv. Tiiden, in the city OF tCincin9ati,
Ss,Sssa ~ S,. SS ap ~ SS spd oSof IS
: Oos:c%s p'' M.H&w TILDEN
NTOTIOE.-TaK UNDERsIGNED HAS
IN been duly appointed AdministTatrlx OF JOBephus
Hobby. late of Hamilton Coucty, Qhi9, deceased
| MARY u. HOBBY. '