Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1861-04-06

They are Id such abundance n his region OF the I
State, as TO cover thousAnds Of acres. ne Pc |
lieved that concerted action for three years |
would entirely rid the country OF them. But |
this bill would not interfere with the law against
the Canada thistle; end il would materially as
sist inthe execution of.that law.
Mr.. BRuFF feared shat the passage Of thlsl
blu would-1from the Simpoesbility Of either'l
obeying or enforcing it--tend to make the hfss
law Q nullity, andleAy us without such protec;
ton against the Canada thistle as that law at. |
fords. efGly kgVl
MI. CONVERSE moved to amend BY max
ing 1t include weeds, which was disagreed to-
yeas y, nays 81,
Mr.. VAN voRIs moved to strike out all al
ter the enactiDg clause, which was agreed to
yeas as, nays %. ssI ss yhge
- Tho committee on Municipal Corporations re-
ported H. B. 473-To authorize the Commits
sioners of Montgomery county to build . bridge
over the Miami River at Dayton--which was
read the first time.
Mr.. SCHIFF, from the select committee to
which was referred s. B. 272-Proyiding for "a
tax to buy the Hamilton County Fair Gfoupds,x
etc., reported the same back, and recommended
its passage and stated the object Of the oblls q
! Mr.. DAVIS moved that the bill be amended,
by striking out tho third sections which provided
for an increase cf the salaries Of the Common
Pleas Judges. taas q isim l'a sR
He held the bill was contrary to the Consti-
tuition, as containing two objects. he also OBJ
jected to the increase of the salaries of Judges
in any case De {, hts .... 9pg 80 :, : ~
ME-. FLAGG explained that thls bill had but
one object, with several details, and therefore
does not conflict with the Constitution. AS TO
the third section, It was a matter wholly with
Hamilton county, whose people chose to pay
their judges in this way; and finding that the
plan worked we'll in the city, they desired TO ex-
tend it to the Common Pleas judges.
| Mr.. BLAKESLEE advocated the BILL vse,
| Mr.. JONAS explained the necessity for the
payment Of higher salaries to judges. !a' "a
ME-. ROGERS hoped the bill would pass. He
had pecuniary interest in it.. They had two
good Common Pleas judges in their'county, who
get but $l 500 a year, and this kept them 30
poor that whenever he went there he had to
buy them something 10 drink, and after that
| give them q chew Of tobacco, fHe hoped the
bill would pass.
Mr.. HILLS took the banie position as Mr..
/ Davis, as to the constitutional question, and
protested against the passage Of the bill on this
ground, as well as against kind of surreptis
tious increase of the salaries Of judges. 1oo
Mr.. WOODS replied to the constitutional OBJ
lection. showing that the practice of grouping
several objects in one bill is well established in
the legislation of the State. ss43
/ Mr.. SCOTT, of Warren, moved to amend by
striking out the provision exempting fair
grounds from execution. which was disagreed
4 20. . 1Qca .us9 asF V9mls1 gl--rI3si-iI
The vote was then taken on the passage OF
the bill. which resulted--yeas 81, nays 25. Sal
The Judiciary committee reported back II
B. 4S9--To change the number Of Common
Pleas Judges, with sundry amendments, which
/ were agreed TO. casf
Mr.. COLLINS moved to amend,the bill by
adding Vinton county to the first subdivision, of
thelSeventbs Judicial District, which was agreed
o,lwhen the bill was ordered to be engrossed,
and read third timeton Tuesday next. .,
/ Mr.. MYERS offered the following, which was
laid over under therule: r., ~ -.,-'. u
| WHEREAs, 1t has been established as rule
by the Board Of Trustees Of the Blind Asylum,
that the pupils who remain In the institution for
five years shall be discharged therefrom; and,
| WHEREAS, 1t appears that many pupils are
discharged under the rule, while Others are re-
tanned beyond the period named; and, s.,.rs
i WHEREAs, Many persons desire admission
who cannot be accompodsted therein: There.
j fore, afei- :. Hts19 ~ - -s.5za-ss - ..
Be IL Resolped, By the General Assembly Of &e
State of Ohio, That from and after the date of
the adoption ofthis resolution, the Trustees and
| Superintendent of the Blind Asylum are hereby
directed to discharge all pupils who are now re-
naming in the Asylum over I've years, from
admission; and they are hereby further directed
to discharge all pupils who may hereafter be ad
mitted, after they shallhaye remained fvs year.
in said institution. -.asssi
Mr.. VINCENT offered the following resolu-
tion which was laid over under the rule:
Resolvsd, By tas General Assembly.ot The Slate d
Ohio, That the Office of the Receiver of the
Seneca County Bank, should, oflright, be kept
In the city Of Tifin; and the Buditor, Treash-
rer, and Secretary Of State, be and they are
hereby directed to remove ]. T. Clsypool, the
present Receiver, and appoint some suitable
1 and trustworthy person, who shall keep hii
Office, as such Receiver In said city Of Tiffin.
| Adjourned. rd.4acs ,ls E'!.w i5cse
j In Thursday morning 3 report, on the passag,
/ Of Mr.. Baldwin's bill, regulating the fees O
county treasurers, there is q misprint that re
verses the character Of the report. The rcpori
was printed: ~ v,l,+sd -, 5s. 81
"Mr. JONAS moved to amend by making IL q
take effect In September, 1862
j "Mr. BALDWIN approved this amendment
as II would materially affect the objects Of thu
BILL" ssl.c n .rv el- ,5ss.iiss atgd n
II 1t should have been, Mr.. o. opposed tb,
amendment, &c. This places Mr.. Baldwin in !
wrong light, and as favoring an amendment
that destroyed his bill. He not only orposet
the amendment, but supported his bill in an abll
i argument, made up Of mass Of valuable sta
tistical matter relating to the subject. ii 5sal
II U=zzE%
i IN SENATE.
j SATURDAY, April 6, lS6I-lO A. M.
Prayer by Rev. Mr.. Morris. .f,..... AVS
Il 49, prrfr,nsa Mn .rvunp..,.