Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1861-05-30
COLUMBUS OHIO THURSDAY MORNING. MAY 3O 1861
deemed good cause for dissolution of the

4 - Dec. lutn 1915 baiu;"InoeeW VINO Btartlo at the
danger Of q separation, tell ne that the soil of
New England is hard and sterile" Again, on
Dec. 18th 1914, the Sentineisaid: "Ttis said that
to make treaty Of commerce is to violate the
Constitution and to sever the Union. Are they
not both already virtually destroyed7 or In what
stage Of existence would they be, should we de.
clare neutrality or even withhold taxes and
men" psi1 ~ a
| Here we have both secession and notification
proposed. But the most monstrous Of all these
New England schemes is to come. 1t is as fol.
lows:
The object OF the leading Federalists in Mas.
sachusetts during the war, was to establish o
monarchy, with enc of the royal family of Eng.
land at its head. Mr.. Willis says the British
Colonel Nichols told him the "Naval Comman.
der had his orders to place Harrison Gray Otis
at the head Of the affair, until the pleasure of
the Prince Regent was known" N'-' ''9 ''H
| What that pleasure was to be, appears to have
been already arranged. The British United
Service Journal Of May, 1850, says the
object was to "separate the northern and east.
ern from the southern and western States, to
establish limited monarchy in the frat named
States, placing one Of our princes of the blood
on the throne" ...- ....
3rilv THE ANNEXATION OF TEXAS.
Texas was from the first rock Of offence to
New England Monroe, who regarded our
right to be iudisputable, was persuaded by Mr..
Adams to give It up to Spain by the treaty of
Florida. The New England men threatened
dissolution should Texas not be given up. Said
Mr.. Monroe in one of his letters on this sub
ject: "The difficulty 10 altogether internal and
Of the most distressing nature and dangerous
tendency "
And what was that difficulty7 The eastern
federalists menaced the Union If Mr.. Monroe
admitted Texas into the Union! Mr.. Monroe
was deferred by these menaces Of disunon! Mr..
]. Q. Adams was In bis Cabinet, and he knew
the designs of the Boston Federalists. What
their designs were Mr.. Adams subsequently de.
veloped in his attack upon the Hartford Con-
vention. - |
This difficulty about Texas again broke out
efter the establishment of her independence,
aud when she applied for admission into the
Federal Union. This developed sfresh the sec.
tionslism and the secessionism Of New England,
and here wo have to note change Of opinion
on the part of Mr.. Adams. He now makcs his
appearance as one of the New England agita-
| tors. -...... , .,.-..-..s -
In speech on the 5.h of Nov, 1874, at
Bridgewater, Mass, Mr.. Adams said In rela-
ton to the annexation OF Texas; ..,
"The whole transaction was fragrant vio-
lation of the Constitution, and its contamination,
had It been effected. would have been itself
dissolution of the Union" This was said after
the rejection ofthe treaty and before annexation
by resolution of Congress-. - .
In 1874. Mr.. Adams and thirteen Congress-
men issued q most elaborate paper addressed to
the "people of the Free States of the Union !"
The National lnteligencer, in which it appear
ed, expressed reluctance 10 publishing 1t, "be-
cause Oh tue acoress rnica II oears 70 tne people
OF portion OF tne unitea States.o ai.,a -,
az meesing In mIoro, MASS, on tne 2atn
Of marcu, io44' 'ioien' secession RESOLUTIONS
were passed. ,o,.
40 Msrcn, .o4o, tne nos,on fo" sho;
by tne annexauon resolunons OF tne wing
LEGISLATURE, MasS9cnuset.s declares tnat sne
win 90 ou' ol une unlor IL AeAas comes N, OF
tnat 2. least sne Will nuiiuy sne acs Of annexa-
ucT, ~
Inc ,oiowrng u one oi ~, .ne resolu.lons e oner.
euDs D, VT DsM, Tp passeu ~ I've s.ss,on ~ ic4a;
."s n ~ cd aas 90 ~ suo po~e.e VI ies.siauoI ~
ta J.;..;n ~ ssa so..i ~ ely. @ sne osse % ~
sue ~. ~ ~ sn pIe;ss sss.e Or serlitoIy y
esisisnoI s,aS;o ,lo sns on'oI, sucn an acs wou,o
aS M. @ "oioe "nA'e'er WIN VI 'ne peopie
Tha Pna,or az. m Tho oe.h 80 m, 1914.
ss;d of ,Ss onnsYs,;ou ofTo~ss. D''' Aon'
en-. Kinr a iesdins r Rsnmhi;c., ,h,s o;vos
h;s an;ninn -, ascs.s;e,. .p'"' mus B''e'
1yV a ~ ,S;s sJn;saS,,-,,,or ;,e......,..
IN bs S;s,sgs,5sd%snS v;,b fnli dai,Sn,a.e aes
sOd nrsh aLs1 conv;c,;on ,thst se
IN rha, forn, ~ MAJ Il ,rd .SnnId ~ SSno An
soIn,;on of The JIn;on ~ "nu 'Dou'u w '"o o''-
'0 tn poa,on ~ S,Ias s.;a. aat.s -rass lr .
| "T. IA : grava ,stter a. d;s,o,ro avail ko,,
rIn,on ss oSrs hos hssnEnona bn, rr..a a.noas nos
shonid savsr ,bs hond W. oan aa, ~ Is. ~
this - fannerat;on of TeYasI ~ 'r"'
Jnbn Oujncv Adamo ofFerad IN The Horsa ~
Represeptatiyes. ON the 2Stb of February. Is43.
tba follovino. among other reaolutions. ''-'''e'
VI Rssoiy,d Sbat S aps 'sa at.er,nt nF ths f,ov-.,, -
ment of the United State. by an act of Congresa.
or bv treatv N anner n th;s IIn,on ths Ps1rSi;o
NJ TsIss ~ tbs naon,s thassof roriS hs III
Iation Of The Const;tpt;on. mil and vo;S ana ~
vh;ch he frae s.a tss of ria IIninr end ~ 49,
!" p'y W. y m;,h, ~, IL = Sum"or. o,h ..s. 20 -.
onacs si,nyod hnt ,hass srs s sre;e,pn, % "a
ta establisb onr nronos;t;on. that ssc,;onsi;sr
d;,nn,onism and secass;on;sn, o.;c;rstsS IL ~
No,thN;n Naw EosIsnSMsnd i,,e arrss = -.
that her own discasded inyentior Sss rssn,rsS %
20 nlasne her T'ha yerv idssMtba ro,,sSr IN,
;nrsntsdN Il rov assa,tsd h1 tho Snr,I 80 IT,,
her Nor ,,snrnat;on bar tvrannv nd bsr gsrs
I've Aboiitionism. Consistency, decencs, y. self
1890, no,, no., ;,st;cs sbonIS ,son,rt Ia !.
tespsc; T@p'
A. three scvessI historicsi enochs bs. Nav
Eaaion5 ssssrted tba r;ght of secss.,on . al.
i g. saronnost 4, ha dsniaI a Nd Sannno, ,;ar
nf IL Onr c;tstions occnnv ao ronch ana 40 ~ ~.
Sr,.hs- omnsnt "a insdr;ssahls H,sto,v y
somst;mss .rouhissoms. Naw Enc,and Tn3s !.
ssnec;aIiv ao' Thosa vbo want sutho,itv for
disunion. sectionaiism. secessionism. and tbose