Daily Ohio statesman. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1855-1870, 1861-05-08

3dgsde Of the, Second Division Of the o.. Y I'M,
Militia Committee. ~ -ts ~ ~
= REPORT FROM SELECT COMMITTEE, s.,,s
4 Mr.YKEY, from the, Select committee to
whom was referred the conventional Interest
bill, mmended its passage. l'g.., ss.B |
Mr.. JONES moved to amend the bill BY In |
serting "any unineorporated bank or banker,
after banking institution at the end OF section l.
Agreed to. sb a.ea at45g basT .a Il
The bill was read third time and was passed
yeas l8, nays l3. gt.ro.,e es} 10 ,e7i
Those who voted In the affirmative were
Messrs. Brock, Brewer, Collins, Cummins. Fer
guson, Holmes, Key, Laskey, Moore, Moise'
Newman, Perrill, Potwin, Ready, SchleieD'
Smith, Stanley and White-lSs ssaob
Those who voted in the negative were
Messrs. Bonar, Eason, Fisher, Garfield, Glass,
Harsh, Jones' Mccall, Monroe, Orr, Parrish,
Potts and Sprague-l3. as
1907 REPORTS OF srANDISa COMMITTEES.
aEMr. KEY, from the committee on State
Buildings, to whom was referred the resolution
of Mr. Parish relative to the State stone quar-
ries, and the unauthorized sale Of stone, after
stating tho facts, reported that, although the
amount of wrong suffered by the State is small,
yet the State House Superintendent should OBJ
tain an adjustment therefor by legal proceedings,
take no further action on the resolution.
PUBLIC WORKS. X rl, 4
Mr.. STANLEY, from the Conference com.
rnittee on H. B, 29l-For the lease OF the Public
Works, reported tbqt the House committee had
fagreed to one report, and the Senate committee
Ito another. .igfses, a3.r. .llpSf ssl
The former is substantially the same as that
agteed upon by the second committee OF Con
4 q sknkk l,a N
ed for May 29th, at a minimum price OF SO,
500, and tha. repairs Of the canals shall bs made
to accom- niodate boats of GO tons burthen.
The Senate members OF the third committee
of Conference on II, lB. 29l dissent from the
report of the House committee, and present the
following report: og ble.s.aa ,..( ed.
| We are of the opinion that this General AS
sembly should not authorize any lease OF the
Public Works Of the State, but the policy OF the
measure not being submitted to the committee,
| we make thefc!lowiDg Recommendations as to the
amendments submitted by the House committee,
taking them in numerical order. III. .,-3 M,
/. Weconcurint nthis amendment. 5l
Q, "a We dissent as to these amendments,
unlesS accompanied by a proyiso to the effect
"That no ase shall be made under this act,
unless the same be approved BY this General
Assembly; and such lease shall take effect only
from the date of such approval" We respect
fully suggest, that the letting should be by pub
lie auction, upon suitable notice, and should be
! confirmed only when the price offered, the char
acter Of the parties, and the terms of the lease
as drawn, shall be satisfactory to the General
Assembly. ,f1lo, t5ri,I c-5ss f.,s. sstfs +,
| S., We coLcur as to these amendments.
! T. We dissent as to this amendment, not
being sufficiently advised in the premises to 70
commend that the State should incur new re
spcpsibilities in this matter.
| %, g.. We concure in these amendments.
4 10. We dissent as 10 this amendment, not
| perceiving any reason why the words ror be sum
| monedp should be stricken out, and a dstinc-
tion made 10 favor OF the lessees, which does MOI
exist as to other citizens.
i II, We concur In these amendments. Z
.aa. 4 IT, 3, STANLEY y Senate Committee.
4 A question Of order, whether the disagreeine
reports would come within parliamentary rule
excited discussion va > 9lo ',s4,4 aa3f9&u
\ 1t was held, pro and con, that ereports were
4 substantially "the committee disagrees"-Sen-
ators on either side maintaining that 1t does ant
, ldoes not require the agreement Of conference
committee as unit 10 make report. y ~
/, The President held that, under the 9th join
5 rule OF the General Assembly, it is that sch
, mttee must be appointed.
Mr.. STANLEY bad leave to withdraw hi
report. 1910
i tee, reported the enrolment Of sundry bills
Mr.. JONES, from the Judiciary committee
reported back H. 3. 4g2--Authorizing COUNTY
Commissioners to levy a tax not exceeding {
half mill for the relief of families of volun
teers mustered into service, giving Commission
Il ers power to borrow money, until the amour
is collected by taxation, and giving tfem powe
10 make regulations for distribution Of the same
The committee made no recommendation, be
cause a general State levy would be NOR
j equitable than local levies. RI
Mr.. MONROE would prefer that mode, bu
Il is too late In the session to draft and pass suc
measure. = 1t is desirable that the meaaur
Mr.. FISHER thought the necessity for tn
MEASURE has been superseded in great meas
ure by voluntary contributions: An addition
al tax would be profession OF outlay. He wa
Ianxiuus that volunteers families should besus
tained, but for the reasons stated, he doubte
the necessity for the measure.
Mr. FERGUSON said there is another res
son why this bill is unnecessary. This lev
must be made in June, to be collected in Decen
ber. The Legislature will meet again in June
when proper bill can be passed. Private cor
tributions already collected will be sufficient
the meantime. = He. therefore, moved to lay th
= bill the table. Not agreedto--yeas ~, nay
! 20. ,.-e1l-. susy. q sg5s 81,
M STANLEY held that this levy ought t
be general, yet he thought the counties woul
manage the fund 10 better advantage than %
State, because the people would hold the dis
u hnrsinc officers resnonshle, and prevent el