Lewistown gazette. [volume] (Lewistown, Pa.) 1843-1944, 1861-09-04

AeIiheT Vas il esT fEEft that, ELll7 n
trigEirg EgE tae Dg.ED2sEs-skElp. be aaa4e
p-8uises zh5eh b. cannot noE fa4tll 1sI
kzE5ng failed g accomplish Gar rem oF<s ~ u
oEses 5y the ordinary PFocessess &c E0E re-
orts 70 tt2s dixfono~a51s alternative CT E1tsFsP-
res=nsirS aar peliriszI rec9rd and position.
What l. fsiIe1 u accomplish By fair means,
L. ~suld r5z d 5y foui ones
And ng# hear what the fellow says
IN his last paper, Pabiisied t~o weDk= af
Ter the above He keeps i seems some
tfsiag u -Liesy,7 which he thus no.i-
ces:
Retiring 70 cur poek=s Iia-y, n which
~ zach uJghr Date tn dy5EZs q he LAY. -
snd - 5ats z February Igtb- - fyllawz-
I saE Judge Hale 70 night / suggested
4 Plan bv which, vh4n ny r=EB@Eal taxes
place. te v.1h3 L able = get the Clerksisip
.5r ons q bis friends lie waS wiling 70 eE-
=. 5a19 t. [ t8l3 aim / desired = q Kept
il oEe7 until 1}.b Il June. buE after thai
Eoa.d be r=4dT f3r r=a40T4l 2aE tiEe.''
Is his izzs paper he also sPe4ks ct the
post o9Bcs as f5lioEs;
r. S=y a9rising u his late asaqaiti7eat
failure u resca the Lsxi.gs~n postmaster
ship"
Ia letter % the Editor d TIE Gazette,
dass8 Washington City, april 8, 1861, Il.
Frysinger sTitez = follgwz:
Judge II. tg,8 ne hz bzi oEzrsi The
place -stnastegsaio q Lexistown = yeu.
znd G. Re E46 rs objection, ard presumed
Tsg would 5e .grztl ned. / SEM u "a article
making pebble the fact"
The article referred 10 appeared in the
Democrat of April II, 1861, and reads as
f5llgEz:
Sc TIE FsstasgstersEig.-I. Is understood
th4. t5s P5stma.lsrship u Lewistosn vas
last w=ek oEar98 70 George frysfng4r, Esq,
editor OF the GaLefte. wb9. fyr private reas
ons, decliEsi 70 aeespt il. The chances now
are decidedly in fa<or of Ar. Samuel Com
fyrt. Ihs appointment zlL probably be made
this week"
Tie man, E0m4a OF eLiI4 Eho cannot
see that oar respectful nePhcE" teiL
downright and pnblnsh;ng falseho4s one
way Or the other in both the above cases,
must be truly dull Of comprehension, for,
in the first place, how could We be acting
djsisonoroJy il efecting his removal 10
August with which We again say we had
nothing whatever to do when By his own
diary he pro, Is that be had entered into
an agreement With Judge Hale f1 BE- rea6y
tor rem1roi gtter tie 20M n lime, two
months sooner than he ras removed? In
the second place how could our application
for the p0stmastersLip have been . mag.
nidcent fai.ure," when he also proves that
Judge II. told him he had OFFERED Us
THg OFFICE, and published the fact in his
paper in April last.
Ia long experience in the publishing
business VIC have no recollection Of
meeting With more 1ncndacious assertions
Aa2 Aoaa soatziaed in the Democrat Of
the 18th aad 2StA August, nearly every
one being coined from beginning to end.
Among other things lie avers We attacked
him personally q! readers Of both papers
know this to be false. That Hc intrigued
ior the post GIfIce-that VIC we're aa arpli-
cant for Office under Ar Fiilmcre-or that
we expected one from the Auditor Gener-
al, are iaisehoods with scarcely sLadoz
Of foundation.
1t Is n0t gertA while however 70 follow
up the gaFings Of one who seems to haze
lost his senses since he Lsst hs ofEee. aad !
we therefore le.Ee him in the enjoyment
Of the no doubt pleasant reflection that
while his knavery did not keep him in Of
fee, it has gained him contempt which
may yet prove serious stumbling block
IN the future Eith al iaen wAo regard truth
and honesty.
~ r.. n.