New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-11-27
SUPREME COURT-GEsERaL TERs-Hov %-Be1or,
Jusiice. 81 KRLANp. H0ezsoon. and BosHEr II


| TIE LAw-sCBOoL GRADUATEs-PRoTEsr AslIssr
THEIR ADMISSION As ATTORNEYS.
In matter application of Henry w Cooper lR
Hs,hmsn Palmer 20 be admitted attorneys and sOas.s
The following protest in regard 10 the admission a
the College graduates 10 practice FLED last week with .hs
order for their admsion but hes been heretofore oveos
In view the importance Of the subject and the hs
fu bench take the view the question win D. rssd
SUTHERLAND Ut seems that reversal Of the orders mad,
a Sa IN s @ syDs aS s ~ es@, G. .s
and the latter Of the University Of New York; for Adn "a
practice as Attorney snd -nne9I' Of Ibis Court nnds sss
cured from The Court Of Appeal pea
Court made reorn 70 the Court Of Appeals Of the order, ADD
proceedings in the matter Of these applications and ha,s
out notice to The Attorney General or any other person hays
held the Of the Legure to be constitutional Ia
orders Of this Court and directed the Court admit .he young
When the Justices ,h Court who were sitting In the Cont
Of Appeals In this matter shall have performed the high dries
which the Con;itgon ,emPosn Combined to them N @
doubt be informed b. them Of the peculiar eream'snces ~
ny which may have Rdaces III "a. IL sPpess 70 qs sso..
the mean tine 70 prevent even the appearance q want Of re.
the decision Of the Cont Of Appeals at the time
fay but earnestly protesting against Il for ressoDs and
understanding that these admissions not to be eon,ieed
''H1 cs1 S y Ja.ee soSaS S eA'
ALLEGED UsURY.
Alexander Duncan al st The ouOudsss Salt Lake Company
This action is brought by the firm Of Duncan Sher-
Co against The deendant to recover the Of 5000.
proHsoy made by the defendant the onondag Sac
company nd ndored for valuable consideration BY The Ohse
The defense a.uy. Iappears that the plaintiff had aecepes
three drafts $1,000 each made by the Onondaa Salt Co
pay the other defendants which eoepAscs
commission Of one half per month paid By the de-
drafts became payable the defendant. paid Of the Whole .un da
+2jOJ 49, iyn balance stl due them Of ss5s2ls.
For further obeaIance the defendant then agreed pay
plaintiffs the Of $50 which made up partly Of
charged upon the balance Of the account still due this ss,
added 70 the Of +2 IS made The amount Of the 10
controversy and for which the roies given The de-
PENDANTS claim this TO be uSuy and ssk this ground DE-
nisssl Of the complaint
and BaEl9w FOR plaintiffs Cummings and neI.aass
CHssBEEs-Nov. 26-Before Justice HoeEBoe..
THE SEwLT ELECTED CITY JUDGE ~ coURT-EFFHcr
OF BEING A CANDIDATE.
George Gfogan at. John H. McCunn.
Thls was an action brought by Grogan against Nc
Gum reeeat elected City Judge by the Demoeey 20
property defendant Defendant, in his answer seueI
that any ouni vas due that plaintiff contracted do certain
The case a. called in the Circuit after being once popo.s
in defendants councils absence oden<
given plaintiff by default Oct 9. Application il
that said judgment hastily granted and that notice that
case would De called va Insufficient In the AdAvis ~hac
this application made mcCunn declares also that Georse W.
Beach material witness for the defense is and has been ab-nt
work FOR plaintiff by whom defendant expects prove h,t
plaintiff abandoned his contracts that what materials plaintiff do
10 opposition the motion open the default several ads-
VIZ wte read Of a6ore on the building 10 onoyeIy 70 TIA
buildings Of the Scott Beach and painds
himself alleges that such bOder engaged any build
ing viii, plaintiff engaged Counsel for plaintiff
sege that the originally the Circuit Calendar foe
Oct 4 that defendants counsel then applied 20 plaintiff
sel 10 popone that the latter consented and the -.
down Oct g With the understanding that it would then r
tried On Oct defendant called on plaintiff OBJ
tain further adjournment and which refused
when defendant said he should apply ir pospOneent hs
PeaRs rhen The cse was called on Oct judgment taaes
would 60 a, once 70 trial which the latter refused
Geo Rhrrefs aofn IT. 49,
tod him hs, he must hsve the matter Postponed HDn
after November the eleconi and Henry Holland q
ITS NC stated that he would Get the best Of Grosa b,
having the case put Of until ser the November election Ok
further stated that be could the put wouA
r 70 y d,;S and h1 avoid public trial before eeot,ons
hsn he DID not care 'SSu the raScy Of the thing TIA, a
81 "a, 100 tos ne could manage the whole shsirs
than 80 that be could easily do for that sum ana thai BIZ
twice that sum Tai. Is corToborssd BY lane HesSS ~
The reading OF these adays created greet anpsnen IN
The Judge decided TO open the defan on payment Of ss
and the cause va ordered the Circuit Calendar Deeeube<
Before Justice SUrHRRL,sp.-DEcrsIoys
Jeremiah ii. johnson ag. Abraham b. Coneer ct al.
Motion for injunction granted with 10 costs 10 s4 ,y-r
Sssf' sa adsS Sy nS :. Abraham LVnsOnRsp'
BeSore Justice ISsnAHAs
hooeu J brown agt. Isaac Hermsnce e al-Re-
feIed to Jsyis IT,. 10 sppOin Receiver Decsss
FIsnci. Bu at Ferdinand c. Lish,e kessue o,a., 81
In above case -
Raeha Meyers, By Der Guardians as Abraham Le,ns.sa
, ms Is a divorce case The parties natives Of
Poland and became acquainted with each after t ryv
@ .h e S y va. PROCEED ths, in accordance Win ID:
Of a. Il alleged that the defendant took plaintiff beora
Alderman Clancy by whom they nor nndee.
magistrate for the parpo- Of betroth She ~ Sss Del
,ed P5Sseedinss to et aside the marriage, ground 4
dvoro" The Jeds- ordered the report 20 b. eonsI
ed sndgrso,ed divorce.
COURT Or GENERAL sESsIoNs-Nov. &-Be1ors