New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-10-30
DOUGLAS APHORISyS.

ted im from BIS SpssChss.l
hold that ihe pscple Of Territory, while Ter
rtory, and during Territorial condition. may intro
doce exclude. abolish regulate Slavery, just as
they p!ease ISpeech at Clifton rings, n l., Aug,
1880.
o IT is indieial question. If the Constitution car
ree Slavery there into hs Territoris. let /. 60, aud
no power 90 earth can take i. away.-Speeeh IN Sem
ate, July ,. 1856.
3 Each State, az a member Of the Confederaey, has
q right TO voice in iog the rules and regulations
for The government of the reritoree II is DO viola
ton OF Southern rights TO prohibit S.avery-lSpeeeh
A. | accept the bred Scott decision of the Supreme
Court Of TIE Unied States in the bred Scott case, as
authoritative exposition OF the Constitution. WHAT
imiaiiors tie CONSTITUTION, as expounded by the
CouTts imposes on the authority of Territorial Leg
sature cheerfuly recognize and respect, in con-
iornity with that decision. Slaves recognized az
property and placed equal footing with all other
| property. Hence the owner Of Ell tves-the same as
| he owner Of any other epecies OF property-hss
night TO remove to Territory, and carry his property
with bim.-lS Ceecb st NewO lsaus, Dec. 8. 1883.
5. " Some species OF property are excluded by law
in most Of the States we'd Territories, as being
wise immoral cont arg TO The principles of sound
public policy Ardent soiIits whisky, randy, snd sl
tie int Xcatng drinks, recognized and considered
rs properly 10 Of the States, if not all Of them:
but 10 citizen whether fcom the NoItl South,
AXE this sp ces OF property with Him, and hold, sell
or use At his plessurs 10 a he Territories because IL
is prohibited by the local laxin Oregon by the stat
utes OF the Territory, and in The Iboan country by the
acts Of Congress. Nor can a man go there ard take
and q his slave, for the reason Speech n
Sepsfs March -, 1850.
G. 81 90 not put slavery on a different footing from
other property. recognize il Sc prop,ry under what
is Understood to be the decision of the Supreme Court
argue that the Of slaves has the same right to
remove 10 The Territories and carry hie slave property
with bip IS the owner of any other species of prop
elty. T0ere is ju.t much Obligation the part of
the Territorial Legislature 70 protect slaves as every
ohr of propeJty there is 10 protect horses
cattle, r. goods, liquors, &O"-lSPeech ia s.nste,
Feb. % 1852
undertake 10 cay that there is not one of these
States that woold have tolerated the ms tuition of
Slavery 10 lis lmiis, even if il had BEEN pefemptory
required 10 do so by the act of Congress. l will never
blacken the character my State by s1ch an ad-
mission: "-lSpeech in Scuate, March l5 1850.
s. :" don't care whether Slavery is voted down. or
voted up."- lSpeech at Centrslia, Sep'embey, 1853
y. No MISTER what the decision OF the Supreme
Court may be, sill the right Of tie people to make
plee urd5r ,te Nebraska Bill 'iSpseeh at Freeport,
Aug. 20 1853.
IL. Ia. Territories are subj'ct to the jurisdiction
and control Of Congress during their infancy-ther
minority; but when they alta their majority and OBJ
lain admission in the UDion they free from all
retrsnts and restretions except such the Cous.i
luton Of TIE Uoi.d States has imposed" speech in
| House Feb % 1916
| IL. az answer emphatica'ly, as Mr. Lincoln has
heard ms ~ sSer hundred times from every stump in
Illinois, that in my opinion the people of Territory
car, by lawful mfats, exclude Slavery from their u-
prior 10 .he fora alton Of State Constitution -"
| speech a. Freiport, Aug % 1853.
-. The sovereignty Of Territory remains in
allegiance, pended In the United States ia trust for
the people until hey shal be admitted into the Un)n
80 STATE n-lDOugiAs's Report on Kansas Affairs,
| March II, 1856.
10. The people Of Territory ike those of State.
ttouid be f perfectly free 20 forri and regulate their
don e,ic institutions in their own way aud no lmits.
| ton should be placed that right in any FORM
! speech at Cbicsgo, July g. 1858
IA u have never said or thought thai Terrific
r.os were sovereign political communities, even lin
id soversgrses ike the States of this Union. - Re-
! ply 20 Judge Bla X, Oct, 1859.
10. On tho go Of October, 1919, Mr.. Douglas made
a spetch at Springfield H., watch was published in
The State hte'ser Of Nov. &, in which he used the
| following laIgUgge:
Tho Mifsouri Compromise has an origin akin 10
bat Of the Constitution of he United States, conceived
tue came spnit OF Isiercal affection, and calculated
oICuoye forever the Cav ger which seemed to threat
en- at some distant day. to the social bond OF
union. Az the evidences Of Tublie opoion az thas day
|, eemsd 10 indicate that this Compromise had become
8noriz d IN the hearts Of the American people as
,acrsd thirg which no ruthless hand would ever DO
ieckless enough 90 disturb"
10. On The I'D DAY OF January, 1854. Mr.. Douglas
brought in a bin repeating the Missouri COMPROMISE In
the fol owing telnSi
"Tnst the CJIs tuition, and all the laws OF me
United States which not locally nsppheaoie, shau
have the and eff ct WITHIN TIE stu eirory
Of NepIssta land kansasl as elsewheIS within INC
United Staes except the eight zee ION on the ses prep
aratory 10 the admission Of ssouriinto toe Union ap
proved March q, 1870, which, biog ihe0nsslsnt VITA
he pfincple Of uOu-intsrvenuOn by Congress with
Slavery in the Sa,os aud TITtorl.s, as rScognzelby