The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-01-21
MORNING ED1rloN-sArURDAY, JANUARY a. 1860.

~~N ~ -~~
those rights; the remedy by an appeal to the moae set
forth ID the constitution, and mot by nulH6catios.
When al constitutional have failed, revelation is
prsis,.ne % further hey mus. resort
the South 70 secede from the Union. he argued that
eer.on did no. originate the South but Massachusetts,
of the country with the South real question at
issue, which . one Of power, and Of which slavery
A colloquy followed between Mesns FARxswoxrn,
(rep Of m and AocinsAxD, ldena Of H., as 70 ths
Position o. ne nnos dsmSc.scy and shs subject Of slave
dem.) Of nj subsequently, took part
PRYoR HERALD
ton He referred to an article in he NV Yoax Hss.ln
Of yesterday, in reference 70 him, saying he was
DE pen Or inspiration Of James Gordon Bennett nett.
AlndiDg 70 that editorial article, Mr. Pryor asked Mr.
hsa nv. va L rue S Is INC ecol assa ma ne
debAtef ~ AT7
Mr. MlsOS, (deml Of Va replied tha. he intended no
rum Of the House. There other ansgresssons of
the ruIes Of order that day, and he had determined
possible to arrest THIS sort Of dscuOn, which might lead
Mr. PRIOR said his colleagues explanation was satsfAc
tory But there rernaipcd an issue between his colleague
that the employment Of the term he made use OF
was unp..liamennry, for which one might just
posed 70 vindicaae himself from e charge Or inrscou
Of the dignity q parliamentary discussion by the ndiscri
Mr.. Hickman had made injurious and unfounded i'm.
puaon the character Of the South and colleagues
mased his sentiments Is false The word fase did not
necessarily imply an insult gentemans statement may
be false and yet he may not design nntruth Was there
any phrase more egmate2 the speeches of Fox Burke
Cay Randolph and others be referred would be found
that they bad used this term. He understood that Mr.
n Hickman Is false and Mr. Hoctromery had applisd
the term falsehood" to one OF hs Pennsylvania col
,sssues. These gentlemen were mot rebuked Why was
r. ss~ 3 q 9S g E s,
TO the New York Erprss, In which mentioned as
that Mr. Wendell and Mr.. Weed had entered into
private arrangement elect Mr. Sherman by procuring
among the number. The correspondent however, had
said he did not believe the members privy the
sdered h colleague or shermanj perfect gentleman,
but they were a the antpodes IN poiitics He did not
wah y % 60 out that he would give him hs negative vote
Mr. Wendell or Mr.. Weed and did not know thsm There
was NO foundation for the charge.
man who acts 9 Secretary of the Union C,ub parasite
BY The name Of Walker sort q who ho
was part Of The system Of lying about Northwestern
democrats.
nnaHm ncx OF rm NEGRO QUESTION.
Mr.. RAmIr, (rep) Of Pa, merely wished 70 discuss
would not discuss the nezhaustble negro question He
ordsr me aouss vas nos bound Sy any 1uiss q tie
preceding House of Representatives The hrst thing 10
order except vote for spesIef he House can ADOPT
resolution except 70 and adjourn. Hence the
resolution Of The gentsman from ohio for the plurality
Mr. CuKrp raised point Of order that all discussion
M. wAsnsuaS. (rep) of Me-, called the gentleman
Mr.. FAH.woRm protested .gains. the gentleman from
Pennsylvania being interrupted.
Amid cries Of ss6rder " ssGo ON Mr. Housros {dcm)
Of s said NO was interrupted that side the
House.
Order being restored, Mr.. RAasrr proceeded. would
be constitutional for the House 70 appoint committee 70
elect Speaker. We have been here weeks IN dis
order, while there has been stasnaion q all the
public business We have exhibited monstrous farce
for The s q hs sss. The sspo1:Sy
desired them TO hsvs al lie glory Or an the he shame I r.
time. they would not permit organization, be wish
ed The qouny 70 know whore The blame rsss He hoard
rep0ed The attacks from the other sido with threats Of
disunion. He had constituency who could and did read
gave bis views on Tho question of slavery He did not
believe in any right to hold slaves unless by special com
mission from Cod e The sncsn. s,s had Hs % red
show his opinions on slavery. he had certain OK.
s:s' from .ss1s Sssry MAa s,s and nd. oass: -
Same doctrines the repuOiSans Do On The saS5scs q
slavery bu. great deal stronger sy % nst % intend 70
stead Of being sectional party, they great
ton party walking in the footsteps Of The Revolutionary
fathers and resisting the asgressons Of the democratic
IL p Of SeSg 70 place him Ss
bad written In reference 70 the organization and which
had found its way into the press BE recaed what he
said theren the conduct Of certain gentleen having
Mr. CLARK, (dem.) Of Mo-. made some explanations Is
70 his object IN introducing the resolution that cndorser
Mr. sHxssAs asked Mr. Clark whether be would With.
draw his resolution, in order to give him opportunity
Hr CLARE said he had avowed his purpose, and would
tell the gentleman that he had had two opportunities 70
make his explanation, but has failed to absofve himself
the Helper book.
Mr.. wERNAS's EXPLANATIONS
been tendered HIM % When hem the gentleman from nissouri
introduced the resolution offensive In character and at
impI time and manner he cut OF what be said he de-
sired TO do, namely afford opportunity for explanation
When days AFTER the gentleman from Virginia (Mr
Mlson) appealed TO him, be stated that be had never
signing any Recommendation. After that explanation
published he received letter from E B. Morgan,
q s s ~
The publication Mr. Morgan stated that while he (Mr
% was writing = big ds he asked psrmssiSn %
consented, provided there nothing n offensive
or improper and conndiDg the Judgment Of the friend
presented plain unvArnshed statement Of facts which
had been 30 much misrepresented. These AL the
assd with this book. The other day, when the subject
was brought before the House, and In language which he
do noe consider couYteouE-When he was charged with
disseminating treason and lighting up the torch 70 be ap
Piled to the dwellings Of his Southern brehrencharged
with crimes which II he were guilty Of them, would take
from him his title 70 seat thai 6oor-when he In
his place and told the gentleman from Missouri that the
resolution waswhdrswn he would answer, - the book
read page by page whether he avowed dsAvowed The
sentiments hcrsn the gentleman refused 70 withdraw II
he did nc4 believe the desire Of the eentsmon -
give him the opportunity to relieve the dimeufy.
So be would DOW withdraw u. 70 give him opportun
~ 20 do what be proposed Never, . help ne God,
while the resolution before the House improper
y and in an uBpariamsnAay way, and ~ adoption Is
urged by cdensive argumepts, viii explain single
word in those extracts (Appause from he republican