The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-02-17
The Alleged Defnicatioa Ira the F"'""
Rank.
corrRr OF OYER AND rERMINER.
Before Hon. Judge lngraham.
SpcpND DAY,


COURT OF OYER AND rERNINEh
Before Hon Judge Ingraham
SECOND DAY.
r.. ,e-Tl. People Us. Wm. J. Lane, Jr,-At the cit
ting OF tho Court this morning, Mr. Buchanan was re-
called 70 the stand and his direct examination resumsd
rh check now produced dated Feb. is, 1852 was paid
nv me marked 81 1t is drawn by J. " Lane, ami en-
dorscd by W. Lane r the defendant had been ia the
habit Of getting tho money from the second teller, but
there was some objection made - that aud no said as
there was objection they would hereafter be placed
70 his fa.her credit and paid by his fathers check hou
maid him this check had been In the habit OF
ips psyments from tho second teller by tickets for
raj wears previous to that u@e, for collections Of
foreign notes pay able out OF New York. AMI usual
U, II not altogether, payable to A. b. Dean;
know OF other notes except those payable to A. B.
Dean; refer 70 collections TO tho account OF Laue
and w. Lana, Jri they are 80 entered on tho registry
during all the time these aud entries were msdc
the defendant had charge Of tho registry these tickets
made by the defendant from the Registry OF Foreign
Notes. in creditng discount bills they were first put
tho "t;ckler and then on tho ledger they got The
stokler from the tickets and from the Register Of Fo
reign Notes the two entries OF 36lS OF and $s3 80
the last two Of page las OF the Foreign Registry.
TAe items In letter No. were compared with tho regis
Ey] Witness oontinued-They correspond with the
tries In the registry, except the items $8l8 TO- $433 a.
S27 SO.
Mr. Brady objected 70 this course Of examination as
Irregular. II this book and these papers DC ad
nitted In evidence they viii speak for themselves.
Mr.. O'Conor said that these books may no, DO under
stood except by the explanation Of the witness
Mr. Burr offered TO read the entry page l46 OF the
registry which first submitted TO tho counsel for de-
fence for inspection
Mr. Brady-we object that entry being received ia
evidence the ground that there no proof OF when
Mr. O'Conor did not the force of the objection. 1t
proved 70 be the book OF 1882 and tue ticket pdrpors
TO be dated in September.
The Court said there date to the entry, the
witness could, perhaps, say when he ngs saw it. may
have been made previous TO 'he time speoined III Tue
) witness continued-Tno defendant lett the bank on
goth September 1885, saw the entry within week Or
two after he left t-
The book was offered In evidence Mr., Brady objected
Court admitted it, and counsel for defence excepted.
Mr.. OConor then the entries from the book There
Is a column with printed beadiDg 10 the credit OF
and at the bottom w Lane, ~" the second column
posite j. W Lane, Jr, s "Waidron, dilsley Co. - aud
underneath ''ncknor & Co" Another column has the
heading "where pay able" and opposite "Newark, IL
the column headed August, and running down to
the place opposite J. lane, Jr, with following marks
"ditto'' then comes single column marked "rme op
posite each of entries or "dilto, the
entry Immediately above them being some month"; oppo
ed is the Seu1e - " and beneath il another 81
The next column Is divided marking dollars AMI cents at
the bottom s6ls 49, opposite the SAB l4
below a mark ditto" and then ..sept = opposite the
figure ar" The ne column headed, .When forward
od at the head or that column is "Ausust and
raj single dots then have 18Th 9th and 18th each OF
which has dotI the last entry Is '15th," with single
dots follow ing the end; check is opposite
these entries irrespective Of the Mr.. OC0nor then
handed the book to the JUICY Tor inspection
Mr. Burrel then proposed 10 read the entry on page
161 OF the registry.
Mr.. Brady objected, the ground that it WAS rrele
want.
Mr. OConor argued at considerable length, contending
for Its admssbility.
Tho Judge sustained the objection, and ruled the evil
dence nAdmssible. -.,t
Mr.. Burrel offered to read the ticket marked no l"
yesterday.
Mr.. Brady said that the ticket reads tFuton Bank,
New York. Sept 1885," We object to on the ground
that its date Is not covered by the Indictment
Mr. Conor sail that the 1876 is 10 print, but the "9 Is
not filed In The offer was, however, withdrawn for the
present q, .-.o1.
witness continued-The entry in the book dated Sept.
7 Is the handwriting OF tho defendant
Mr. OConor said that the entry in the book and the
cket corresponded. He then read-.ill. DIS. .,H
In the book the nrst column ID W. j. Lane, waldron
and Co., @olS IS; then nckner Co., $a3S IA carried
out, 3l,l6l 90. aat...a ati ~
Witness continued-Tne hrst column v tho name
Of the person who have the credit the next the
a payer the third The amount Of the and the
last contains the amount TO be carried out 70 the
dealers logger the amount to be carried to the dealer
ledger 10 col 9o-he aggregate OF the two notes.
Mr.. OCunor then read the ticket as follows
FULTON BANK, NEW YORK, Sept. y 1856. !
{ Charge Newark Bkg. Co. s
Credit, (
w. j. Lane waldron l. Il Co. s6ls rs {
Eckuer Co.,. 433. IA /
-