New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-08-15
LETTERS FROM THE PEOPLE
MIR. WILLIAM DUER.
II In, N. Y. 7rsbwps.

=. "A, ESsssr II Tas NJ y 7'sb~"@
GO .t,s- vour very able review of Mr.. WIN. Daer In
....s of Aug. 3. i, would perhaps be unnecessary
e me 20 say ANYTHING in order 10 convince tue
80. "a 20 where the truth is. But wish 70 eau
-,;,,a, attention 20 one Of his Statements In that
art of his letter which be devotes to me- M Duer
says: .,..,.a q, i,cs, ,fbce 10
aFiyst, Is fslse that when nominated 10, nd
G., Fr.pcsco ,ueh nomination was pade upon any -
iS pronise or pledge express implicit that Was 20 IS
C'o'niS ny home Nc & cS snr ven a. alleged
did before hear Tia the PsSPs o1 of @ % 70
Office Certainly such condition vas made IN my case
believe In no other " l. ,-,o.a
that which he KNEW to be utterly fslse. tie Knows
that the party which irst nominated MN was Va'ou
the Peoples Reform Party, and one OF tne man 'us'
which they wished to reform was the very ssNn0 "0
plsyed on them Of getting an once any 'ue"
the State with all the money toat oouu NC 'U
of IT," and the subject OF nominating n'"o 'U'
MILO expected TO make California their hone' was er
ta.ed not only IN the Republican ana People C'h'el'
ton but was the occasion of long editorials IN Tue pup,
6c press and was also the common street elS o. al,
sbosA vino expected to vote the Reform lloA't a'u
NJ nn,r can asst IT with equally god grace, ana
5 stand the same chance Of being believed, ihat ne
IA not read any of the pspers pub lsued IN Sdn Frsa
49, 51Tino the meetings of the Convention ~hich
nerninsted him and which were IN SESSION some TWO
.raeks or more, So much for Mr. Duer,s hrsI
NJ Diner meets nv assertion in regard TO MS kepu.-
Gcsnsm in 1857 with fat denial, and am "ilnns ~
should rest on question OF vsraelty oet cen nl auu
me do not Withdraw the charge out WGu'u ~ S "
have him deny that he voted tn straghs h't
STATE apd County ticket headed by EDWARD StaGv or
Goveruorl In 1857. AS 70 whether ths hepoohcan
vote was necessary to his election or not yo1 nave al
rssdv given thvoe sDow wing that the Repabhctn VOC
sms zoo oyer all others ald at least 4OJO oil the
100 votes cast for Stanly would have supported Ay
one whom the Republican Convention ~oud nave
nominated for the Office TO which Mr. Duer Was eie'C
ed Anv person caa, therefore. judge as 70 waesueI
tba Rennbean vote was necessary u his election, snd
how much truth there is III assertion 10 Tue 0On
trary. =, -. alr.o5s ,or.
Tossed that he contributed money 70 the hspu0 th
Comrttee; why dld he do so if did not need th9lr
snpport The People Committee had rai'e an me
fnnds necessary 10 carry the election and j tHe
Rsnnblican support was unnecessary, why od ne pay
In regard TO nv name, which Mr.. Duer demands, You
can give il OF not az you please de can nave IL from
nv own lips II he vii accept oI d H'''e Pi0Po'''i0
have 70 make, viz
Jfbe and his conferes succeed in their sale to Doug
los and united Bell and Douglas ticket which means
ali Dou0asl shall be run IN New lork SIale, wOnid
like TO meet him the stump and speak once 10 each
of the counties of NewlOrk that was carried Oy the
Demoeracy az the last electOn-s8y 20 commence any
fine after the Goth of September the appointments 10
he made by him. He can then have an opportunity OF
fighting "a he w II be on the side with Liv 5rpOOl
.Jaek vbon he denounced FROM the verandah OF the
Oriental Hotl in 1856 for 6aot-bcx stuihng 10 learn
whether | am oowaIdly or mendaelDus lie can mere
expatiae on the glorious commercial raHctes OF the
socalled Constitutional Union party, and viii reply
In a cause equally sacred and much more necessary
than the one In which he was engaged when ne made
the aforementioned speech. SACRAMENTO