New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-02-29

Of appeal, ne contemplated IN sbe preceding section
| Agreed to.
Section five provides for sscerssdnng tie vsiaA %
rights privileges franchises &c TAKEN ~ IN '"' '''
| OF lands and bridges in section three. a,
Mr. Slaight moved 70 amend by ssostltmms saS
Ch.ef Justice for Circuit Judge. Agreed 70.
section directs the method OF proceeding IN csse o
| appeal.
Mr.. Slagh moved TO amend 80 as 10 allow fhe Court
| to review the proceedings Of the Co nmissiones.
Mr.. Pore hoped the amendment would not prcvsa-
nj; sisieht said that he supposed this reasos WE
sumc'em when the gentleman srose in his pc = ans
advanced this argument all day long, and il had been
very potent one, and be supposed would continue
- be go.
The amendment was not agreed toy to29.
N. Slaight moved 10 add a clause that the Supreme
Court, in proceedings under this act shall have power
to order special cres and grant ne trias and then
pY,csedr 20 shall De subject 70 removal and review
by q writ of error.
mr.. Pope hoped the motion would not prevail. IL
vas intended to XIII the bill. For HE part he dad not
like these amendments.
M Slajght said he supposed that, aeual sbi ar
onmeut of the gentleman from Passaic would provs
a-powerful. The amendment was not intended to
kilIthe~bff and was not unusual. 1t w,nld Suply
place tbi, corporation in the "a ne position or spy
other corporation aid person.
Mr.. Tsese advocated the anendIsent. lie did not
believe thai the Houee would vote IL down. II was
just and pscessa proyision, and should DO incospe-
rated IN Ire BID.
Mr. Wa4dron asid that, few evenings ago, he s<e-
ened BIZ argument by the counsel OF the New-Jerer
Company and those &c ,emen said that 10 this secton
they bad no objection, sad if they were willing TO ac.
cept it he cav reason why the Houae shouts amen&
il.
Mr.. Slaiaht said that he wishes of the New Jersey
Railroad Company did not influence him; he was not
here TO represent that any other corporation He
considered he amendment necessary, and had offered
it in good faith. 49,
The amendment was lost-21 to %.
Mr.. Slaight oieIed amendment providing thst If
commissioners shall Determine that any franchises,
bridges roads, or other property shal be taken by
this corporation, then trial may be had with AL the
rights which parties are entitled to.
Mr.. Pope hoped the resolution would net prevail
1t was lOst-l7 TO 81.
Mr.. Cooley moved to adjourn. Lost-20 to IS.
Section gives this Corporation the right 30 run
their cars and engines over any other railroad or
bridges in this State which are public highways, and
constructing all necessary means OF access thereto;
and hori2fs the of much of the tuDnel aud
road OF the Long Dock Company as they have con-
racted for.
Mr. Teese moved 20 amend by striking out the first
part OF the section comforting the right TO connect with
other railroads.
Mr.. Bond accused the opponents of the bill of cap
tious opposition, with a view Of delaying the bill.
This MF. Teese denied in strong terms, The amend
ments were offered in good faith and it was untrue
that they were intended for delay.
The amendment was lost-23 to 81.
Mr.. Waldron moved to amend by adding that tbs
last proyiso TO the first section shall limit this section
in I, be came manner as if it was here repeated.
Agreed to.
Mr.. Slaight moved to adjourn. Lpst-22 to IS.
Section makes it lawful for this Company to mako
contracts with other companies.