The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1860-06-25

10 not propose, Mr. President address the Conven
toh upon TINS occasion because former occasion
port Believing the Convention is prepared to act upo
this question without discussion, i demand upon tho
plausel >-''
The previous question was sustained aud the resolu
tons were adopted by unanimous vote and with enthu
siastic cheering.
Mr.. GREEN, of North Carona.-I do not want it said
in the coming contest, that a sectional party
therefore offer this additional resolutions:
Resolved, That the constitutional Democrats of sue
States as are not at present represented in this Conver
ton, be requested TO unite IN organizing and formin
electoral tickets in their respective States in favor
the election of the nominees of this Convention.
Mr.. HINDMAN, of Arkansas, moved to amend by insert
ing the word National in place of constitutional
Mr.. GREEN accepted this amendment and the resolr
ton adopted.
that this Convention do proceed to nominate cand
dates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency which
adopted
Some considerable pause ensued while the various dele
cations consulting.
Mr.. FISHER, of Virginia, offered resolution calm
upon the respective delegations to contribute for the
penses of the Convention.
Mr.. JOHNSON, of Maryland in behalf of the Maryland
delegation asked that the gentleman hdraw that
expense.
Mr. FISHER thought it would be very unjust to limos
tat burthen the Maryland delegation upon tn
oty OF Baltimore; hut being appealed to by other dele
saes from Maryland, he finally consented to WITHDRAW
VT. BRADFORD, Of Pennsylvania raised question o
t III regard to the right of of his delegation
iderab,e d; rom Congressional district and &C
NJ o. ehsned upon that point
~, DoihIN' VI massachusetts thouobt M datagat
Should east more than half vote as ~ ~ 80
the actual representation here In Con,o,; sio,
once did sit IN this CT ty, although egbt ro
sets had retired, 1t was reported that
ten votes Massachusetts had eight votes cas-
they would claim to cast no more and bn t now an
would be careful to do nothing which could bs 'he
foundation of Misrepresentation naoe IN
Mr.. BRADFORD did not wish to be understood ~ -,
ing the right of those delegates to full vo, IN
wished the question understood and as tn w..
the effect of the rule of the Convention.
Mr.. YAYcEY thought the absence Of one delegate from
Congressional district should not dsfranchise that du
tric in part if the other delegates present
After further discussion, Mr.. BUTLER moved that eac
delegate cast half vote and
Several gentlemen supported this proposition
HUNTER, of Louisiana, suggested that there
@ In the way his delegation and perhaps other
~ ecteu by State Conventions and instructed to
81 fi xote OF the State unit They did not ther
80, 'no'lzed under their instructions to east ha
huid 80 90 ialy withdrew his motion, and said h
Tha Dr. psynprn zen case settled it arose
- So .,I announced that he had received a tel,
gIah rom 'Ie delegates from Minnesota rao,as,; 49,
his Convention. e' 70 cast their votes Il
Mr. STEVENS, of Oregon, moved that NJ 1h +.
empowered to cast those votes 'a' Nr johnson
Mr. AVERY, OF North Carolina raised n ouo.., -
aef na' no delegate could by proxy authorize deera