Lynchburg daily Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1852-1861, 1860-06-21

Missouri I'M, Kingl forced hiu 10 spssk. THAI
gentleman had said be would No vote 70 IL shsss
Southern delegates in, How did he sxpeet 70
elect his ssndldatst And how iong was Il sines
he had given his last democrstis votss He hsd
violated bis instrucsions, when The speaker
I~ng.) he fels glad. for without ooncession sbev
never cosld succeed. There were Ave hundred u
good men in the country as Mr.. Douglas, and II
this trouble. 7'''
Mr.. Douglas Is doing hers jas. what Mr.. Ben
ton did In Missouri. Col. Benton divide ths pxr.
ty there and they were In the minority athere I'll
the old man died. He was % anti Douglaa nan,
and came hero such, but they passsd resolations
in their State convention 10 abide By tie result,
and he would do so.i Bot pass resofuti6ns Of n.
struction on him here and he would resign and 70
home. They were here lighting among thssn-
selves like cats and dogs, when they had an sps-
my lighting right up in front Of them. He 10
heved that when the dsmocfutic party wasi dr.
nsmbered, there would bs disunion among Tie
States, therefore he urged, Cancellation and her
mony.
Mr.. Avsry OF n g., said speeches mad. NJ her.
to-day by the gentlemen from Psnnsyivanis and
Illinois were not the speeches 70 aslsCt shsir cab
didato. lie came here with his dslsestiun 70 stsnd
by tho candidate of the convsntion--a convention
composed Of oil the sovereign States But hs saw
southern democratic States excluded from the
convention. They came here representing he
regular organised democracy Of their States and
were entitled to admission. The speaker aop-
posed any test NJ 0 condition Of admission to the
convention The North wcre here in the ma
jority, and opposed the admission Of southern
delegates 30 that they might have them at their
mercy.
Mr.. Atkins. Of Tennssses, said the democracy Of
his State needed no pledges, asked no tests. He
trusted tho majority Of the Convention, for the
sNnu mt frupu h A L. >E Il a.
tho sake Of the past-tor Gods sake, would har-
monize-harmonise lie concluded by dsman-
ding the previous question.
Mr.. Motif, Of Virginia, moved the Convention
adjourn. which was lost. .u.e a1H
The question rscarrsdL on ssoouding the pre-
vious question.
Another motion to adjourn was lost There was
great deal of confusion on the Aoor, members
standing aud talking. i... -..l ilsl. q .Ha Il u
The demand for the previous question vas %
conded by yeas 234; nays lSi. .....z..
Tho convention then, at O'Clock. adjourned tin
10 o'clock (Tuestiay) morning: N
*At the morning session, Mr.. Howe, of Ten
nessoc. offered tho following resolution: f,..4t
Resoired, That the President Of this Conysn-
tion direct the Sergesnt.at- Arms to issue tickets
OF admission 10 the delegates Of the Conveh-
ton "a originally constituted and organised ss
Charleston. ala ..,. ...,.. ann vi s5#5.4.
Mr.. Church of New York, proposed the follow,
ing amendment for Tho above:
Reso'ecd, That tho credcutals OF nif persons
claiming seats in this Conventan mado vacaut
by the secession ot delegates at Cbnrlesteni be ~
ierrcd 10 the Committee on Credsutials, aud aid
Committee Is hereby instructed as soon a. practi-
cable, 10 examine tho same and report tho Nance
Of persona, entitled tn such seats with the district
understanding. however, that every psrson ~.
cepting n seat in this Convention il bound 10
honor and good faith 10 abide BY the action Of
this Convention aud support It's nominations. -
Mr. 9illnloro, Of pcnns sylvania. offered the sub-
joined substitute for both Of the above resolu-
tons: H.....
Rsso',cd, That the president Of this conveniicn
be directed to issue tickets of admission to seats q
the convention 10 the delegates from tho States u
Texas. Florida. Mississippiand Arkansas In which,
States there are no contesting delegations. -