The Burlington weekly hawk-eye. [volume] (Burlington [Iowa]) 1860-1876, 1860-12-08

;F2S55ST S'Fs$ 55Fsss=
r.! H. IS |...ll.l, $685..
~. a. !
49,: ..s3s.l ]. ss,S "
/ - s ...a ~.
lesl1 - r.! r.. g. -. N n. !:
IT. n - = s. "a ~: ~ ~. ~.
- - r.. J. \, a. IN
- d n = !. n saaH
80. ~ = .sS - g. sx'
U M - IL IL yelsase
$780,. ~ ~, IN ss..lss n - 3.
Il A. y. 1920 ep a
.1... ~ Il ~ "a b. ! D 81 49, " j.
r. s.|z ~ - ~ "A y y
s.. - y, <lss 80. ~ - D.. So.s
~ q ~. 49, s n ectl
s.sl 4. u r, !..l a4 Il. ~ tne
-e.Hs ia ssys A.ays - ~ 49,. 80 - a
80 49, n. 49, "a - = so 80
Ns..s 8 ~ =! - 4 ss2es 60 y. i
In. s2s4 q 1laee W. ~ se.3sey - ~
49, Us VA q = - 800 ~ e1ns - -
- 49, y 49, ~ e.
nv sP $3.50 6 .essss 49, 49, 49,
$500 u ~! - - - ~ 80 !. 81 g g
- u pin seea haso q ti1ssgAFd
- - Uqas1floA 80 le4A Il - &Fsas injury
q - peopse otneessy 60 ~ ~ ~ - 49, g
- gnion ~ ~ - = - g edvanss
s1Asno VA - vsosaee n1 ee4 !eo vo&so
= q vas ~ eyeey pssos3pse q Jaasace--ot
Vesseaao Htasy. 80 u Il IAN ~ - evexs ac&
H. ha9sese s1ase lAv - oeea eafs!ee inte
e1ee1sse0 - every ee1(eete0 eAop @9ee Ne cona'
eeec91eos 9 - psns .e4@tni!eta9ons
1900 y = p - rffgtsed Nlsn essae
o. ane toseeFeNtenSe - with sAoasldesAbis
sxpeneo g - Ooyssn@ank Let - TRUST shas
ne Btaee LagIslatass ON repeaI t1eif nneoahsi.
taeaopai eeno1ious enaeensnss; enies. thae saall
pe done Nteno0e unneceeAfy delay, tt 10 impos.
@ole tor any numaM power g ave ~ Untcn.
ne soateern Stafss standing on the basis q
me Co0entuuon, have right 20, demand shis
660oid Y be refoesd them, the Consultation, q
which all the States are paftieA viii have been
vilenlly violated By ons portion Of them, IN Z
provislen Aesentlal y the domestic security and
happio ~ the remainder. In that event the
injufsd DAses, after having first ased an peace.
fal and caDefieatioaal means % obtain redress
would ~ 1niusti6ed In revolutionary redssancs
70 the govefnment Of The Union. ssl ssssAt
have .parpdzk ly confined my rsmaFks to rev.
olltlonafy fesistance. beeauss Il has been claim
ed Within the Last few yeara, that any State,
whenevse II shall be her sovereign will and pleas
ore, may eecede from the Union in accordance
tith the Coestitation, and vithOut any violation
Of the coustttstional rights Of the other mem.
befs Of The confederaey; that % each became
parties sf the confederacE that o. each became
parties to the Union by the vote ofits own peo-
pie assembled In eonvention, 20 any one Of them
BY the vote Of sach . convention. In order ia
Justify secession q . constitutional remedy, il
must he ON the principle that the Federal Gov.
efnment II mere voluntary association oil
States, 70 be dissolved IT pleasure ~ one Of the
eoutrscting partiea ( IF thia be %, thu confed:
eraey ID . rope Of. sand, end 10 be seperated and
dissolved by tho Afst adyeise wave Of public
opinion u any Of tie atates. In THE manner
oar thirtY. three Stafeo NAV resolve themselyes
into. q NAM, petty, jasrine and hostiie repsl,,
licS eack one retiring .fro,a ~ Union,, ~isions
responsibility. wheneyor any sudden .excitemen,
night im6el then 10 sucA s coeecea by this pro.
.ceSs Uiion mieht b. entirely broken into Ss~x.
@ehtain few weeks, which COST our foyefasherl
many years Of ton, pfivation and blood 10 estab.
Nh Sach principle = wholly incnnsistens
with il history. A. it was framed With the
greatest deliberation and care, il was Submitted
States for ratification. tts proyisions were dis,
sussed st length in these bodies composed Of the
6r1& menof.the country. Ieaopponepts conteDded
that It conferred power upon the Federal Gov.
eminent dangerous 20 the rights of the States
whilst lie advocates maintained that under fais
construction Of the instruments there vae ma
foundation for sach apprehensiona In tba,
mighty struggle between the ffst intellects Of
thia or any other country, it never occurred to
any individual, either among it's opponents or nd.
vocates, to assesS or eyen 70 intimate that theiu
efforts were al vain labor, because the momen,
that anv State felt herself aegrieved, she nigh,
secede from the Urion. What crushing srgu
ment would shis have proved against those who