Memphis daily appeal. [volume] (Memphis, Tenn.) 1847-1886, 1860-05-05


noblsss Ronan 81 tham In. nousse 81 iaugh-
ter and applause feptttcd ronfl after rocnd.l
His failing voice snd strsnz-b FaFnsd him
that be must bring bis remarks 70 3 close,
without making saeh aa arEansnt a. De
should desire 70 make, % prove hes mlstaken
rhe South was II he policy fne ncF ed.oca-
tsd. He would Only say IN eohcinsion nat
The S1zfhfrn states had izst e many r<hta
10 The Territories a. theT needed Give then
m equal chance sid slavery would axe care
Of itseI. Take 81 The oalaide fsstricti0hs and
YOU may taka AZ he squaitef Sovereignty you
please. he rouid Be wiling AFTER Inst -
tfast b tie great D~snerJafie PanF foF tae
rroteedon ofthe tights 81 TIE 8edfn.
lie believed that II his Convention should
brrak up lna rOes a81 TIE ntmocratie party
II hld 6e destroyed, thefs wcaid b. an end 70
toe Union. He was not a disunioHist. He
loved ths Uni0n In - mrmoFies q ia past
IN It, hopes Tor the future. Hc concluded
With a sulogy upon unioa men, expressing be
coniinued cohddsnce IN the Natsnai Danoe-
rscy Of TIE Northern States.
Mr. MeCook, o. 0hlo, uoyed tie adoption
Of the following resolution
Reoires, nat ms onrsnian vdr tftosd 49,
p ~ oftaia az, b. HsaIofths stats 2 uounsn =
a~sandlists fof Prssidseb ard imaeisie th-fe.itsf
| uuiief states.
Voices. ssy 4 o'clock.
Mr.. McC0ok. The tins fxsd n he r~ssoiu-
ton would give the longest time asked ior BY
any menber.o Of the retiring convention. Upon
this motion he called the previous question.
A delegate moved to amend, BY Inserting I
o'clock. Several delegatea had had leaFa 70
Tsiirs. shd Il was rot right to take this action
In their absence. [Ches, OF eno," HnoF8
Mr.. McCook. Tue previous q~uestion ha.
been called and no amsadment has been Or
dersd. W
NJ. Rafferty,, Of New Jersey, % he part Of
bis delegation presented the following 4btes
az inst the vote Of the house, overrul8g thI
e~eeision Of ne enair, % the controversy res
pecting the casting Of fhe vote q that STATE
The undersigned, delegates from the STAT
OF New Jersey TO the national Democrats
convention at Charleston, and representing
large majority Of the Democracy of that State
Ia view Of the decision made By The said con
vsntion on he morning Of ne sob Apnl
1860, denying % the majority q said delegate
the right Of representing their STATE 10 h
manner provided BY Their STATE convention
held on the 2sth OF March, 1850, m the FOL
. lowing words, to-wit:
Raolrfd nat - rcodmuend o. ~ rapfefutatFI
"a MS state % ne Chtrlesi1u conVentl1n 10 easf ol a
occasions that may arise IN that convention init
: vote
DO hereby solemnly and earnestly protel
against such a decision, FOR the followin
AAAEA
1. Because it is the duty Of the represents
3 tiEes 70 obey the will and carry cut the wish
3 Of their Constituents.
: 2. Because a rule Of the national CONVEX
4 ton, depriving all delegations whose mann
Of voting may have been proridsd Tor BY the
e respective safe eonTsntions from casting Il
4 dividual votes.
= 3. Because, under the above rule, and
. obedience to ius requirement, the delegates
the State Of Georgia, By the unquestionI
ruling Of the president Of The c0nventio
z were deprived Of the privilege Of voting Q
eording 10 their individual Judgment.
= 4 Because the consistent ruling Of the pre-
= idsnt Of the convention was overruled BY
a majority Of the votes Of delegations who We
themselves under the eonstraint Of provision
l. made BY their respective State conventions.
(, Therefore, the underslgned hold that 4
; rights Of tie sovereign State Of New JersI
It have been infringed 70 is grsat wrong Al
detriment, and ~solemnly protest against d
same.
d Done at Charleston this first day Of May,
he year one thousand eight hundred and sixi
d J. Van Arsdale, for Fifth congressional d
D tTict; Wm. Wright, John c. Rafferty,, A.
Spesr, John Henyief, David Mar, s. Doug
~, Samuel Hanna.