New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-01-20


on the contrary are SILLY becoming tn, great pau
P''s " '"o ~, sing seven, eight, and ten per
GEM o'nO'' anu ue yelling them al enormous dis
C"""'' W ry ' iron 20 poor IN quality thot our rails
depreciae at tht .,,o 90 ero six and even tan per
cent year.
Looking al All these facts, Is it not clear, my dear
sir-
l" sthe necessity for the contraction OF deot exists
D' Svg,ou the world IN the retio Of 'he adoption 81
* ree-Trade sysem of which you are The earnest au
Z rocaie1
That the greater the necessity for the contraction OF
debt the greater is the liabiiy to the rseiiieI -,
comm, rcl CRIES such ms you have well de7cr,'cI
Tho ,h more frsou4nt the crises the greater is the
tendency toward the snhsction Of the Aoorer 10 Tue
m . bio errlov.r and toward the creation OF
slavery even where it has at present 10 eAis'ehce
| Aud therefore
That If ia the bounJen duty Of every real lover OF
freedom to Labor for the Ietscabsnment of the pro-
i tective system among onrel''s
Al foot Is gwen as you see, yonr notice Of refusal
20 ,ter nnon toe discussion 10 which You have been
inyi,ed. For a reply thereto permit me, my dear Sir
~ refer Won to the following exposition of your own
views in relation to free discussion, given ny your
self n few days since, in The Ercving Post. IL Is ae
follows:
"Tro,E PoLITIcAi LRcTURSS-As readers know,
project h-s been nnder to gre e"u o. a.
pronrtn pycisn OF ala parties were to BE Hyird 10 tsAe
rait We now uueeupd that the schems has alien through
p snly because 10 Jingle Democrat eold be found who was
wiling vcItie his patty op'ion and msints,n them ~
RsG Al aud American .peaecs We assured that Of twenty
HorheIn and Seuuern pruocistc siesrn VINO nave oeen
bs the setter inving speakers Represented
nun beI very foremost c zs Of ali shades 81 pohtc
II sititsr 90 ieIteisUS ] f a. sssnre NJ east ono
,1nA
inst IKE OLD oubriqUo OF The "un'erueo Democracy ms
miner roget ibe failure u toe proposed course OF Hetnra
but ged know Nat many heIgp ieant were Viii
| sn independent couse"
! Obviously, these Democrats fear discussion. For
wears they lave been Advocating doctrines that Will
not bear exam nston before the people. What, how
1 ever shall we say 10 the Frce-Traee advocates? Is
thee any ore of ikem that would accept proposition
like the one 10 lich You have here reierredi Would
they even accept an Offer that much better than
tbie. that it would give them, of col and rejecting
TtG9e7s fee handred times as yoa could cGcT
10 Democrat If mere auditors? Would Nc Halock
of The Journal If Commerce acceft the magnificent
offer lave made to you, which, thus far you have
not accepted Would ii be accepted by Mr.. Greene of
The Boston Morning POST VIII you accept ' If
YOU will not csn you Object to the coarse ofthe Demo
cratic leaders to whom you have here REFEREED
Scarcely 20 think.
Ho,i to hi al that You have recoDsdered the ques-
t H. and have decided 10 accede proposition which
will enable yon 10 address 10 million ded hay q
rfQ9ers all The arguments that be adduced in SUP
rort Of Free.Traoe DOCTRINES remain, my dear Sir,
vs,y puly and respectfully yOuIf,
| W. c. BRIAsr. esq HENRY T. CAREY
Fhha6elpniG, jan ~ le6O.
This was published in TIKI TRIBUNE Of the l'thinst