New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-12-14
SUPREME COURr-GEsERAL Tsas-Dec H.
RECENT OFlsIUS-LIABlLITY OF TELEGRAPH CON

| PAyIEs.
bdor Iapdsberyer ct al ne Magnetic Telegraph Company
| lie lLiif on the 10th Of January, 1851, sent q
the Of the defendant the Magnetic Telegraph
dispatch 70 Dc 20 ;, hs o ~ " ,Ss.+
S.Id-: Oct ten thou'snd dollars OF the Man company
ing at New oik addressed to H. +. Lsmmeyer No
.Lh peron being found in the Neviork Directory word was
teleg he'd hack to hewurless for the correct address
hi- Delay the proper pau did not receive the message
until tie 2Sd Of January he consequence q which Sss tnei
into buy Cos revolver and deliver 10 the hrn of LOGAN
IL and tue p1S1d lost nseGy e on sum .ne G
purchase, beside paying Locs Co. 800 az damages ior non
lie trssnon OF the drpach aud lost 80 49, interest upon
Ale plaintiff claimed from the Telegraph
who tie tried, allowed only the last two Items:
he'd Tie broad general lne In such that the party injured
entitled all bis including gains prevented
zen losses suS ed and Ills rule is subject to but two
eoLoions The damages must be such fairly be
oed hss entered into the coniemr alton of the parties
they made he conlTscthat is must be such might
| naturally be Ell ecled 10 follow IL violation.
And they must be certain both in their nature and In respect 20
| IL. cause nom " hich they proceed.
items oAnsse receiving this dispatch for transmission
ne deLesns tsd whatever in relation 70 y OF
f he dpth ieE effect OF delay in the delivery
tie IeeIt BY tainn, in Nev1 ON Of the OOstheren men
tioled De dats not informed of special In
night they naturally expect to follow from the delay 10 the
e. H. es e o. 's sg use ,as sum % Hs
such ly the aw OF New York determined to be the iaere
e @ 0' II. aaS s sSees BE- affirmed
LeiOe Justices Sums AND lSeRAHAx, and BOsSEY.
DECISIONS.
Stephen A. BaItba It al. agt. Mary c. Cornish
Ltnry lsli ct sgt The Liverpool He-YOrk and Phisde
authority examine witnesses Florence Leghorn not
Martin W bIett ct al sgt samuel BucEman impesded &C.
Le 9IdeI directing the party to produce
too broad and LETT ia the party the decision whether any Of
them related the in and basis
sey r H. ard lie ofdsT should specify particularly what
produced That portion of the order appealed from Is
LycuItu. EsyltOn al ust Augustine Fordorder of the
Special lean lled with 10 COSTS Opinion by Sutherland
Mary P Dmsndo ast Charles C. p Durando Order of spe
cs e athi med with SlO costs Opinion by Sutherland j.
Jsnes Quick agt Ellen r. uuiet-Urder Of Special Term
NAN Giiitn ag Thomas Clark ct a-Judsment for respOn
The ok Ice Co. ag the North Western Iusprauce Co
In re- the n 4 Packins Betting Co.Appesl dismissed
before Justices IseHAHAy, BoSsEY, and EoGEBoos.
Reyntlds sg DiusmOre ct AL (76 other suits against
with p.s to be paid by the plaintiffs to the
attendants DnsnOe, Sanford aud 10 for
any of The actions the DEFENDANTS may elect.
The Count adjourn ed to Dec ~ at lOs m.
LHANDlks.-Dec. ld-before Justice SUTHERLAND.
DECISIONS.
Samuel ShardlOw agt. John =. Ellis ct al.-Moton
fol injunction denied without costs to either party.
" n r. hinba agt Nancy Jane Acknowledgment confirmed,
'''''' Before Justice IseRAuAx
owsLce Of Z "a ordered
join r. Anterior ag Henry Dslley-If the defendant had
b..u arrested had given ball. Justified he would still
have had tie gt this motion The feet that
the bill without being eTpoed the trouble Of the doe.
the The motion be heard the merits on
Dec. IL.
Elsh T. Brown sgt VIM Sherwood-Roferred to n Jarvis.
jr, 10 81 point Receiver and take security
Caleb GUdIey sg John c. Johnson Schotion granted by
deisul,
Mo,es R. Gnes sgt John W Jackson ct alThe answer ia
clearly iyoous The plaintiff should demur to it, Motion
deIi. abide
lares }. Uppenh.mer al agt Frederick Nussbaum-Mo-
tie sted payment of ali in judgment and 10
Of motion Tor hug undertaking with -uTeties
ovd OF by Judge to pay what finally be recovered in
tie
CmcuT-DEc. i3-Before Justice BoSyEY.
DISPUTED PARTNERSHIP.
Nathan Smith agt. Haskell 3 Smith ct al
Tlis action is brought TO a balance due for
merchandise ,old 10y the plaintiff.
lie liant ALT that the deendans the time Of tho
sale o the goods partners, doing business City Of
New Il OH that th'i busnegs nip provisions goods
&c TO the e Indies and there
th,H vessels that the deedas purchased goods fpn the
plaintiff oI the purpose Of sending them the West uds
which they paid but that balance sn and
N paid, amounting 10 the SIM of S3,Ol7 80
be de ndBnt Hasket 5. Smith denies the
complaint AID alleges that he partner the
the Ia controversy being whether he wss not
p1n the INN. The other defendants no defense
Dsvd Field end ~ Ter brown for plaintiffs H. NJ HYDE
ard lieIson 4 Jackson Tor defendants.
SUPERIOR C0URT-GgSERAL TKRN-Dec li-Before Jus
tees BOswOkTH, HOFFMAN, and ROBRR1soS
IMPORTANT QUESTION or UsURY.
The Belmont Bank and the State Bank at Thomas
a o.. BAnk