Daily Nashville patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1860-1862, 1860-06-25
BALTIMORE, June %.

I'VE condense from very long elegraphi'
summary in The Louisville Papers of Satur
day the following as an intelligibt synopsis
of the most important proceedings f Friday
, Mr.. Cuttings. of Maryland. a>kd consen
to Wilhraw the Gr<t part Of the repn-t so as t
leave before The Convention, as his report
only the resolution admitting the fancJ
delegates from Alabama. In so doing, b,
states that il bad been rumored outside tha
MS report had been made in consequence o
the fascination Of Mr.. Yancy whil. n ad
n!itted that Mr. Yarcy was the most fascina
| ing man be evar met, vet. those who be
licved such Influences dictated bis report
I'm. " liiii.. of l. m man, or OF his pTin
ciples as Democrat.
al. MtIgnI oi MIS-. raisfd a pointof order
hat no motion had ever been made 10 ad p
Mr. Cuttings report amendment
The President decide the pUint Of ord
| 10; well taken. say ing that the report TOOK
g." n"siiion Of all amendment 10 the N jJrity
report.
a.. Wright OF Mass oil jacied to the with
ir'vyal of the first part Of Mr.. Cuttings re-
port.
Ir. Cuttings then asked consent to with
raw his whole report, which was granted.
IrnS bringing the minority report proper fir
in order.
| Mr. oram Of No. on behalf Of The minority
| Il Ih- commit &c. asked leave to file Il stale
| HrnI of the reasons for their conclusion il
/ he report
Mr.. Wright, of Massachusetts, obiec'ed.
Mr. Sibl-y, If Minnesota, asked wheiher
| 90 lion uld event the reading of his
| stat1raent.
| ~. I'm said if permitted to file this
ratement lie would waive the right to speak
conclusion Cf ihe debate.
| Mr.. Wright. OF Massachusetts. still object
L, when the gentleman from Missouri com
ncnc d his speech. He Should rai-e point
# order that there WAS TO debate on the re-
Orts az v"strtGav. and therefore there could
be no right of reply.
Mr.. Clark, oi Missouri. called attention to
he remarks of Mc>sTs. Phillips aud Stevens.
It Oregon. Yesterday. which Certainly made
d-batP On the TepnrT.
The President d, cid ikat the debate had
AIKEN place and gave the Il or to MIR. Crum.
Mr.. Crum then read statement giving his
-easUus Tor the conclusions of the majority OF
be Committee on c ediHtials. He argued
hat the secession of the delegates did CT ate
acanciPs and trouble. The resolution
adopted at the Charleston Convention recug-
az d such vacancies and called on the Stale
u ill Ihrm. The minority OF the committee
while denying that vacancies ~ ist, proceed
render their argument absurd by filing
hose very vacancies by reappoinLing ana
reaccrcditing delegates 10 Baltimore. Tie Gre
u utIals of The Mississippi d le3ates bore on
siIeir face the fact that they were appointed
III the 30ih Of May, and MANY were new
names. The Alabama credentials of the
delegates bUlc on their face the date Of their
tPpUintment, rot 10 ghI> convention. hut to
Richmond {: and lever down they were &C
-. d ted To this CONVENTION. They might
we'll have been appointed also to the Chicago
convention, but y bat man would desire 10
be admitted on such i rowing commission To
Democratic convention? The statement
proceeded to give similar reasons for The
tdmissi0n Of the SOGle delegation from
Louisiana, aud j compromise OF the deleSa-
lions from the other States.
Dir. Brown, OF North Carolina, rose to
speak. but was called to order by a delegate
from Maine who said there was no debaiabie
question befor. the Convention.
The President relied debate cut of order
The question was then taken an the sub
stilution Of the whole minority report, by Mr.
Stevens. Of Oregon. Cor the whole majority
rrpnIt. The vote was called by States. and
resulted, yes I001. nays $50. So the mo-
ion To substitute Mr.. Stevens minority re
port fer the majority report. was Lost.
The Chair having r,qU' sted that no ex-
JrSssion CT applause or dissent sbould be in
iulged III, the result was received in silence.
rhc vote then REQUIRED Oh the adoption OF the
majority report.
MIR. Church. of N Y. and SIR. Jones. Of
Tenn, call, for division of the question
III each proposition.
The. question TrIt on tbe first reso-
luton OF the majority report. admitting the
rigiHal delegates from Mississippi. which
was carried nearly unanimously. the only
Il gaiivc votes h,ing tao from Pcunsy fvaLia.
ud :cm Iowa. Hall the vote from Massa-
cusrtts declined 10 vote.
Capt. Rynders, Of New YOlk-Mississippi
having ben admitted to seat>. move thai
they lie admitted At once. [Cries of no, no;
-, yes.l Capt Ry nders-Me.l, | don't care
whether you say yvs or no, l make the mo
ION.
Mr.. C1chrane. of New York. raised point
If OIder that the report not adopted ill
adopted as 1t whole.
The Prrsidemt-No motion is before the
Convention. the Op ration Of the previous
qu, sii"n IIeV enting L.
a del & te inquired whether the Chair
would issue iickcGs 10 admit the Mississippi,
d,legates.
rs direction vi line Convention in that re-
s"c:.
Nj. Stuart, of Michigan. OF j cted to any
iu,iness Dut the questions before the Con
'. HIiru.
4 vote WAS then taken o. the second refO-
luton Of the ni;juliiy Ierurt admitting tbr
Suue del, ga;itn from Louisiana. Tie vote
l. l55 ayes aid 9S nays. So the second reso-
.uti"n WAS adopted.
TIE QUESTION WAS then taken On the third
resolution.
I.v q .estion was taken upon the three
several prupo>iIinns. Isl. On The admission
ni Ih,. Hindman delegation. I'd. On the adj
mis>iuu OF the Ho,p'r del CATION, and 81.
Giving The power I0 one set 10 cast the
whole vote OF the State If the other sei With
drew, all were adopted. A vote was then
aiken Un the Alb resolution at the majority
T, pOIt. limiting the original delegation
from the State OF Tennessee, adopted. Only
81 yut,s in The negative, from PeunsylYa a.
MIA and / hon Oregon.
4 woe WAS then taken on the 9Th resolu-
ti0n, admitting Ars>rS- Bayard and Whitley
of Dyla" arr. The resolution was adopted
vii hout iyi~iOn.
The resolution giving Mr.. r. L Chaffee
the seat in the Massachusetts delegation con-
tested by Hon. b. +. HaiIetl, was then adopt
cd. 13S 40 Ill.
Mr. Stuart. at this point, made a motion to
reconsider each vot- and lay the same on tue
table, ii bcing understood that the motion
not 10 he pat until votes ON ali tli- prop
osiIiOus had been taken.
The sevcnth + solution of the majority, de-
cIaTing AT. q T I.lOn entitled to the seat In
she Missouri d legation, claimed by John b.
Clancy. Was then adopted, 1881 to I12.
Mr. Cessna. OF Pa. NOS ed 10 reconsider the
vote and lay the resolution ON the table laid
over.
The eighth resolution admitting the con-
testing delegate from Alabama, was next
Adopted. 1851 10 1913.
MIR Cessna moved to reconsider the vote
and lay that resolution on The table. Laid
over.
The question being on the ninth and last
resola iun of The majority report, admitting
both delegations from Georgia, and dividing
the vote OF The Stale between ID, N, with the
provision that if either reIu sed to lake seals