New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-10-01

yyh,,.,, TIE bill from tie Hs1se o. fep-esntat'e'
o ON xour table repeating the slave cede In ne" "si.' "
1900 Lv tie people themseytB7 hh paH0 ms"""'g"
bg under ~ doctrine # non rfeyreHfoH, ms doe
g Seigt 70 call sgHater sorerei5H'y me people "
,rto hare todycrd oHd protected SareJ In nc hoe
-, yy;foyl Jrdy Gii doefrrs they hare eoarsrfed
, =, Pre- Teroy1 into S0rs 7e-Tii0yv more hoH tr'
,,, me ,i.c If TIC state Of kep York. tader his totne
gr,,U has Lsea eJiesded ,om The Rio Gr0hd 10 the Gr Of
california and firm The H1e 81 ne Rlopur @ merieo'
aot oniy NJ 70 70 deg 70 MIN bm ~ 10 30 de9-eiViNG
yor pEcHYK AND SLAVE TERRIfOhi THAN hou
pyr AED In IBi8 aud 1882 and 1880 you only asked to
lave the line Of IS deg 20 min ThNasbvle Convection hxed
hn a. It. utiusum offered Il in the seuse in August S'8
and was adopted but rejected m the House Of Representa-
,t You asked only up 81 deg - min, and noH1teTre
zion girea gou Stare Territory ~ 70 3 dgA pHehEs AND
HAY NoHR THAN AsXEpi aud yet you say that this Il
facTihCe Of SoutLC m rights
Tbese are The fruits principle which the Senator nom
Msssipd hostile 10 the rights OF the South Wbere
did YOU ever get any other fruits that were more paatao 70
your ste or more refreshing to your strength NhHt other
inch Of Free Territory a been converted into slave Territory
On tie American continent since the Revolution except 10 he"
Mexico ard hrzora under the principle Of non
affirmed A. Chareq,onl be that this principle Of non
ion has given Slavery all NewMeKico which was
sure un5ed on nearly every side V Free Territory viii not the
sane principle protect you in the northern States OF Mexico
when thew ere acquired since they surrounded by Slave
Territory are several hundred miles further south have many
asree OF gf ar heat and have cmste and soil adapted to
Southern products Are you not satisfied with these practical
fesusl DO you desire TO appeal from the people Of the Tern
the Territories When you ditst the people and appeal 10
with both Houses largely against you the question:
Whist sort Of protection will you get? Whenever ask slave
code foru Congress protect your institutions IL Territory
whe!e the people DO not want II you will get that sort o. pos;
ton which the wolf gives to the lamb you viii get that sort o.
friendly hug that the grizzly bear gives to the infant Appealing
to an Anti Slavery Congress TO pass laws Of protection with
forcing Slavery upon unwilling and hostile people
Sir OF all mad schemes that could be devised BY the
South or BY the enemies Of the South that which recognizes
r.
En- States or Territories beyond the single case provided u the
Constitution or the rendition OF fugitive Slaves Is the most ia
| td"-AJTerdir 10 Congressional Globe, Tage 5i+
In The face Of this record, the supporters of Mr..
Douglas, including Tie ~ T. Express, are row
asserting that Sarery can nercr 20 into any q our
present TcrriiOrios'
What is their excuse for this assertion
Mr.. A. II. Stephens Of Georgia last year pre-
missed that the South did not need and could not
profit by more Slave Territory, unless she were
allowed to reopen the Slaye-Trade and procure a
fresh supply of negroes from Africa. Mr.. Seward,
in recent speech, repeated in substance this asser-
ton. And there is certain Limited sense in
which it is tue. 1t can be profitable to re-
move negroes in any considerable numbers from
the rich bottom lands Of the Gulf States to work
them on the cold sterile uplands Of New Mexico
And yet Slaves hare becn taken from the South to
New. Mexico, aud are held there to-day. Con-
yeniencc, habit luxury, Incidence, incline the
Southern master whom business, Office or adgen-
t1re draws to q new region to take his familiar
attendants along So Army and other Federal
officers, contractors &C., &C., have taken their
slaves not only TO New Mexico but TO Utah, where
they are held this day as slayes-just as they
would be held here if our State laws did not forbid
Just as they icH be held, in spite of those laws,
if the Supreme Court shall decide in favor Of Viz
giuia against New-YOrk in the nOH pending Lem
mon case. Slavery is VIGOROUSLY out OF place and
Improbable in New-Iork; yet there would be
twenty thousand slaves in New. York to-day If our
laws permitted than TO be held here. Slavery Is
a clear mistake to-day in Delaware, Maryland aud
Virginia; yet with what death-gripe it holds on
there Aud New Mexico is quite as well adapted
70 Slavery as threefourths of Virginia.
What we Republicans are resisting is the extern
sion Of the area whereOn slaves may legally be
held. We ought to understand by this time-for
we have been told often enOugh-that it makes no
throughout our country only in one corner fit;
but We know great deal better. Had Slavery as
Mr. Jefferson designed, never passed the limits Of
the original Slave States, it would have died out
ere this. Give it every ten years new stretch OF
country like Texas or New Mexico, and it may last
a thousand years, and grow relatively stronger for
centuries Both sides understand this; and neither
the Wing nor the Democratic party was broken up
for nothing.
New Mexico were to come in as a State under
existing auspices, che would almost certainly be
Slave State five times IS large as New-lOrk, ~
Mir. Douglas says-and so would remain for many
years. She might not have a thousand slaves, aud
yet be as thorough satrapy of the Slave Power as
Texas or Arkansas. But give US four years Re-
publican ascendency in Washington, and We viii
have Slavery out of her (for it was put in by Fed
eral influence and patronage, and probably have
her ia the Union az Free State, along with
Kansas and Nebraska, before the end of Mr. Lin.
coins term.
Champions Of Free Labor the stakes of this
contest are empires Woe to you If through
apathy or iethaTgy sou Jose them