New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-06-11

and b. pess the sdnis,raoo Of Coat Of the United
wss ngued 70 dsy Decision reserved
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT CoURT-Jw, s.-sesors
-.r... Judxe SAAiLHf. e ..n. .r.f.
.s.- s sEsTEEcE FOR Rsy0LI AT saA. ssl .art
Edward Rilty, y coored man. who WIS convicted
:. asr Fs s n on Gps IL r. for
IL ~s sray hencu. nsab f d. ~
WITNESSES showed ta1 they were ineneod with considerable
seel tssted ru seh taken In With the f.s
s" s bs dn IN prononnpg comparatively nd eusnc e..
lie prisoner .heud Be prison
.e ASSAULT WITH DANGEROUS WEAPONS
In the c,,se of Franklin Nichols and Henry ~
Ben pesd The frper the mate and the latter the
,iP G. T. ohen, who pleaded guilty Of as.snns other
ls Of Nichols showing that had preyiousy Sustained good
character nd bad before been charged with the con
Hr T. e stated A Re VS.. 50 much below Il. usual
that he Sgs not 70 e hs S :. S 5 a hard
for IL 1os Il @ g ps oa aa. , s
SUPREME CoURT-GHssKAL TKRx-JuSH a-Before Jas
tces SUTHERLAND, LEONARD, and Bocxss.
According 10 announcement, the Conrt met this
morniIg and rendered decisions In the various hoard
ing tie Term !, being understood that the dPated Chamber
nc, would 'oa, Up before the Court there large
Before Justices suTHkKLAsD. MvrnIs and Bossrr.
CAUTIos TO sock AUcTIoskEKs, &C.
The PEOPLE sgt Ad,lphus Rannsy.
TIE def ndaIt iii this case was convicted under the
&C, Of iss for Eos fraud IN ssffs@das German 500
tni held that any gross fraud under bdot
THE wALL.sTREET FERRY CASE, ..-.. -r
Sharp sgt The Mayor 81
In this Gaze tie plaintiff recovered a judgment
srn., defendant about $4,000 by Of defect in
siesse the wansreet Penny The Controller undes .c
10 DEFEND notion snns IT sps
Ien ard he PLAINTIFF agIeied The Grgeal Term decid-d
By dd nj Of tie costs Of the reference and subsequent pro
eeedgs including 10 co- 81 motion OF Speci. Term without
costs TO either patty on appeal
1HE ooLosFLcY OF THp FIRST REGIMENT
The People rel Waiter w. Price sat Spencer H. Smith
TIE long lgaed question as to the rgh; and t'l Of
Fin, Regiment decided The Court denied the desndsn
Se sas % 1 AsS as o s
consnd Of he regiment sud setting asids bis election
his mission o. Coo" Of the regiment aud command il
Wm Howe spPeaied for the Attorney 8. council
TIE argument ofthe appeal and s. C. Bailey L. rtn for
hiE snih.
DELINQUENT ATToRsEY.
In the case of Stephen e.. Maroon, Judge Sutherland
stated that wh there testimony 2 show the guilt Of
any knowledge of the transaction There was however
roH 2 T hi Ss en- T r. T' afsa S
iDItey would BE- ordered to O. L. MOe e-q to
TBE RIVAL CHANBERLAINs.
The People Nathan C. Pl4tt sgt A. V. Stout
This case was brought up by stipulation before the
Of City 1 Field Nh Tlss, I 70 @ g
red the pavers tbs detailing the proceedings Of the
.sSe saG wa any tie bst was made At Special ref
e1 for bs the removing pow va. sole guide Of whs;
oon.uieo cause that IN this sufficient,
an saSi he S.toitsd them sd As other banks paid
trss on depo-t City Of Newfok ought have the
benefit Of interest well individual that the yearly n
ts,. Of - GO COO t per cent was $4,000 at per cent
go snd there why the Chamberlain should
enj prqu tie like this but the contrary, every
c ta the objection that the Board Of Aldermen
rs Convened heI the 5eOTs SOH1god in va.
lberstive body that the Board subsequently removed al oe
DID not Ilsce Stout beyond removal .nd 6na, tina Mr.
having been legally removed Mr. Pls' legally sp.
MIS- S s, srt % AID ID Of pd@ision Of Nj Plat
eedy In csce by virtus Of appointment oDud
be removed without that the cause must BE- stated that
The m. ~ Of aldermen could be deemed
and II unless 1t be- just aud legal that
u, a. md net cause a. there wac no law ordinance or
custom curing the Chan bean interest
th. use Of money for Withholding e. and Mr. stout
had Ssd the @ q ascss II nS nd hssS Ia
keeping money u9e%Ppyed h DID R,sds, whs the s
that tire Chamberlain had refused loan him the public
10 be invested private pecustion This would have been
s d, ~ entitled to e Of G accusation s ins M and AZ
orpOltrly efend the, this oOS had po,ve to rovey e
pat 81 bses1 b. Board Of Ai5sen had SdOurnsd
S. p SSi Ss bad NO sad & proceeding
n aint ined Deci'ieu reysr.rd =,
for M Stout A. r Lsrrence for the Controller.
John Z. ireadwell agt- Myndert Van Schaick.-Mo
ton 10 n,nd order and 10 dissolve injunction granted unes
tie plaintiffs within days ser service Of copy Of this order
defendants such undertaking bond
In such an th such urees and in such FORM shall be
proved by justice Of hs Court to the of ali
stc have accrued and shall during the
tendency ~ Ills action with and damages In this
uden shah be srued In whole or in part by the coo Of
peals 3, ~
Brady agt. Belknap ct sl.-0rder of Special Term
affirmed with 4 10 costs. .
Montcrief agt Montcrief.- Order Of Special Term
affirmed with 40 costs.
POWER OF THE GOVERNOR TO SION BILLS AFTER Ap-
JuURNnEaT or THH LEGISLATURE,
The People Rgt james Bowen 81 al.
This was the suit brought by the Attorney re-
the Metropolitan Gss ~ sht Company from commencing
operations the ground that the act creating the ComPa! had
been Rred by after the adjournment Of the Legs
lstu. aud W therefore inySNd Athe Special Tetm the de
fe,ts denu to the plsut aud their demurrer -
susine1 The plaintiffs appealed 10 the General Term. which
Judgment the Special Term for the
on demurrer must be Iev.d nth costs Josiie Sutherland
Dissenting The Court decided that ,he Governor hsd no power
70 sian bls after the adjournment or the Leg.otnfe
Mott agt. Board Of Supervisors.-Motion for new
trial MED with costa. - - -.
Maicom Campbell, Receiver aat. May l.. Foster ct
s-Orse OF SPECIAL Term, modifying Injunction affirmed, with
I 10 costs. 49,, q
SaInesgt Seme.--Judgnentic r defendants at Special
Term on demurrer affirmed with costs