The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-09-20
The wsst Washington Market Gaze.
SUPRLME CorRr-CHAMBKRe

beiore Hon. Judge ingrannm
Srrr. 10 --Jawes D. Taylor Is TIC Mayor, Dc, ii VEG
Fork This was motion for writ Of resslu ton to which
objections we're interpreted BY plaintiffs counsel
Msssrs. Hoyes McKeon and Anderson, In beha Of the
city moved for writ Of restitution In the Wet waning
ton Market case.
Ex Judge Tdmonis, counsel for Taylor, objected 10
the motion being heard the ground that the Papers Of
fsred In the motion not such were required by.
the ruifs or The Court
The counsel for the city replied that the objection wss
unavairg now, the papers returned 10 The
parties serving them within twenty four hJars az req mr.
Cd by The same rric.
rr. Edmonds In reply, stated that an tnere vas no
name Of the attorney the papers they did know to
whom 10 return them
The Court held that the defendant.he parties ssry NJ
the orderwerc the parties whom The papers sbouid
have been sent back Az this had been done The OBJ
lection Of the plslnts counsel obvlacd By waiver
The Court would therefore hear the motion.
Mr.. hckeon then rsked Tor writ or rtsa-ton Of the
Wet wsshngion M.rke. property to the city arder the
o-cer ~ the Court Of 2sih Of July.
Mr.. Eimopds then followed In Ioar arramsut "a re-
lssop 10 the reht OF Taylor 10 remain pos q me
prem scs lie conenced tha, II worid b Utterly npos.
OF that property the passes u % their
haBd fer the tenants not The Of tac do
serted tina! hey win claim Una, ,heT arc tssnss n no
state u View York and not Of the city o. New Yot under
aLy cIcuIfances, ana TIC wn0a cftcf. therefore. OF
trantl0r this mon upon the present ocsason ard De.
acy order TO stay rrccectlags woei be neither
less than 10 permit that numerous o9dy az
teLaliF, am sustifg 10 hundreds, 70 seep the
RMS AMI profits OF these premises % tecr own
bands. Aud ~ urcn ,be other, q sun.aieni and
be called Upon " account for and psy /, the dsfer-
dart U.s. IN care Of On uli recovery, whatever
receivc-f such bor6s shoGd be taken-ihea mutually
j u er the benefit q 10th psi1s iai s-ch bold Be
cote 10 the meantime u Ia q importancs fsrt cqn
table impairment fhoud be pot In Inc way OF the Crpo
ratN fcr the crifctnn Of these rens he submitted
that there vas 10 Intention irclrason 70 se IT DO
fnrcc tic crds a the roart and COMPLAINED Of the VIM
Jut &c irgrshsm In granting the rotor fcr -cftrson
q Ito property The cy, remarked TIA, n l.. ganis
rad suIicrs DID thrk ~ to obey Tie cfieri N the
Court aud ctuli cxcrrc thensslvtr from doing CO. 10
woua be psr city wrrls fcr TIE Courts 10 make any
order Al ALL The orfer had been naAe t,e stors were
the Court anf within TIE power ~ The ri ard
long thaf crer stosd u thelr ia.y 70 obey
whether bss been obeyed not ID i not uessssuy 10
ssy new, a. the counsel Az fr nothing bet order
carry that into ensct
Mr. Fsmonds. IN concluding his reuarss fsii--r nave
shown that Ne ntend ~ In Rood faith in reference 10
ms maissy and We ready carry oGt sry s1ch enr.
pose 40 will protect tie psrtles ~
NJ Noyts raid be had no bargain 70 maze v IN The
Other side. -
Iucre rsmones said that he understood there ~sss
esrgsn N conie plson BY some parties 10 ~ the pro-
Mr. Soyts denied any krcw,csr- Of any such nAsgsis,
md siiered that argument necessary from hm
The order for this day also asked for - ntaromsns
agnust James b. Tay Tor for contempt 10 dmoeeyug tne
order before made but - . nsv order, retnrhAoe ~
twelve O'Clock on Thursday his dsy) for tbs psrsal~
waived ~ The counsel for the city unsn shcu.
csrrrpp cv orsrrs potrs.--rne Cambridge (Nd.)
Herald ssstes thst Thurs iy last urre -ere