The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-11-22

time o. Ire National Fair, IN 1889 september then
ssw him With hr Burch pass through srspery Ani
some few days beore iost The seryi,e Barch; -.
Stuart 70 60 the three four times IN NE nj
1859 wbe WIS 10 The root ys.d ad act zee ssv %
viii ga : s.ssr or rom rom Ma Burch; vent v
ssssf DO s1 mot % ss s S soas Sore
iats ssress; oily rsso,ees driviss % sua.ss once
think thai the arsi letter ever carried ~. 70 sne sosns
or IS67 while sSuArt siok ~ NE fremont Mo use
have taken notes 20 Ia Rouse 10 70 al 100, .,k
grapes there while Burch was away Hcrcn eo drecioal
With me 10 do sos took grapes also 70 other pAs; W
Mrs Ashur Carter and persors whom took ootes
10 Stuart house gave them sometiaes 10 Mrs STUART
have delivered notes 70 Mrs. Bnrrel whom she would
come 70 tbs door have taken notes NJ Barres hocse
directed him and delivered them 70 whoever came "
the door think have delivered more than one note y
Ms Bio roll have taken my or moro notes 70 BurreJ
might have deposed only carried twenty 20 him; thak
all the notes were directed TO him. the Why say
never have spoken 70 NJ Buros about this case;
made 70 write few lines In my handwriting do not
reOoect the nrst time Mss spsudng came TO tho house
there from the time Of Turner's sickness I'LL November
think abe there since do not know she wIs
there one month 2, 90 no xs ~
se about the case whom went 10 make me deposition
think they asked mo what l know at the time
n xritisg think Nr Burch asked what knew; be ssked
me- recollected two particular times did not
y Ss Ssa SSs mp sh
me 10 come: I used 10 70 down there sometimes; don't
know whether Nr Burch told me what he wanted me 70
for might have been there an hour don't know but
We were talking about this A the time; think MP
Miller began the couversatiop; had seen Miller beore
went 70 nr Haynes ONCE with note; went 70 Mr. Oan
fields TO md Miller did not 20 TO tell him what KNEE"
went " ind Mr. Burch; he was not IN any bank at that
time.
Direct examination misunderstanding important vas
elicted; the witness had been nkcd BY any
person TO testify to what WAS untrue In the case
O. Did you ever M Burcb ride round with fancy
womeuY A. No, sir.
Mr. Bectwith-I object TO that question.
Mr.. Van Aynan flor complauant)-We have the right
ask you inquired Il the witness had toto man That
left Burch because he Id choose 10 drive him
around with fapcy women.
Mr. Beck with-rhat was only "A 70 cha. witness bad
said; what complainant had done, but II cocn
sci desires that issue we y III gladly acopt Il
The deposition OF Mrs Harriet Brown. Of Chicago wife
OF VIM Brown, banker. was partly read Il test1es
until this last winter whom Mrs Berch NOT % wilng
10 make visits because she said her mother objected TO
her going into society much abe had received letter
from her mother 70 that Erect.
Cross examinator--When thess frequent visits took
place u generally Just before Lent when numerous
parties were given; Mrs Eurch lost sister In April,
1869. and did not attend parties after that.
Counsel for defence were proceeding 70 read nrtner
from the testimony, being on alleged cruel and hsrsh
treatment % wife by Burch, when the Complainant
counsel objected unees the whole question - 70 treat
mept could DO opened
This point was argued by M Beckvth, for the do
fence kr Arman, for the complainant, the former
OF drec. evidence opened the door for the defence 10
read the whole cross examination.
rhe Court rose before deciding The point and adjourned
till 10 morrow.