Wilmington journal. [volume] (Wilmington, N.C.) 1844-1895, 1860-07-26

B6EWe hardly deem it necessary to reply at any
length to the article which appeared in the Wilmington
Herald OF yesterday (July l9h,) under the caption
VI" Dodged Again" How, and how well or how Ill we
have met and discussed the issues the present canvass
we must leave others than ourselves the Editor OF
the Herald, to decide. Let that pass But we will take
brief notice of some illusions of the Herald to another
matter as follows and we will quote all that is ssary
for full understanding of the matter in question
In recent article we state that the tendency
of the agitation to which tie Opposition party Of
Carolina are now the sponsors, has been and must be-
to array classes against each other-the poor against
the rch-tbe non.savehoder against the Shareholder
the same agitation must in greater degree, tend
to array different sections against each other the geo.
graphical position of the State and the social arrange
menS of her people being such that the interest IN slave
property is very unequaly distributed We then add,
Such has been the result we know, and while we would
be the last to charge AbotoDsm, or Abolition tenden-
cies upon any class of our feow-ctizens OF the South
there can be denying the fact that the largest ad
loren gains looked for in the central portion OF the
State which formed the theatre of the pianthropc Ia
bors of the Rev. Daniel Worth"
In its article already aladed to- the Herald refers to
this language and says that we have made grave and
serious reflection upon large intelligent and industrious
portion of the people of North Carolina, among whom
it was the fortune of the Editor of that paper to be
born and raised etc. and further proceeds to say that
this insinuation coupled with disclaimer, is unwor
thy of the Journal and trust the people of that sec
ton will brand it with their most indignant condenna
ton. They arW remember it."
The Herald does not enghten US as to uhich insinu
Il - A. IF he
State to brand with their most indignant condemnation
whether it is meant shat they should resent the insn
uation that they are expected to give gains for ad Udo
REM or that certain portions of two three counties in
that section were cursed by having been the theatre 81
the phsnthropic labors of Rev. Daniel Worth. If the
first their indignation must fall upon the friends of Mr.
Pool for we have heard time and again how the Democ
racy were to be swept off the face OF the earth lii the
precise sphere OF the apostolic labors of that holy man
If however the Objectionable "insinuation has
reference to the unfortunate fact that the Reverend gen.
tleman did labor aforesaid, need hardly say that
that has been matter of legal investigation, and is now
a matter of record. What awful and mysterious mean
ing may be hidden by the last alicsed words" They
i aUW remember it, is more than know, but we dc
hone thew uvW remember it sufficiently to dsappont the
hopes that the Opposition have based upon their action
aud that they will go for Ellis and the Constitution
like the large, intelligent and industrious portion ofthe
people of North Carolina" that they are.
By the way, rather think that one county at least
in the central portion of the State may disappoint and
dsprove the inSinuation of being likely to give
gain for Poosm,-that county in which it the for
tune of the Editor of the Herald to be born and raised
we alule to Orange county. We trust all the coun
ties of that section will dsappoint the Pooe calcula
ton made for them and brand with Indignation the
assertion made so often and boastfuy by the Oppo
sition that they going it for Pool with rush. .
We trust they aCW remember it. Yea, verify.