The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1860-11-29
Ia W NTELLIGENCE
CRIMINAL COTRT-LunGE nnNn

CRIMINAL COURT-JUDGE BOND
In the cases OF Mrs. Ann Eliza Hinesley, William
Russell and Thomas Temperly, indicted for perjury
in swearing falsely at the hearing of the ha6eas
corpus case of Erasmus Levy, before Judge Bartol
the Court ordered pleas of not guilty. to be en-
entered, being the same the verdict rendered by
the jury in the of Jeanette Russell indicted
for the same ofence.--State rs Peter Brockel-
man, indicted for selling liquor on Sundav-tried
before the Court-adjudged not guitv.-State
Henry ROsca indicted for selling liauor on cleo
tion day-tried before the Court-held under
curid.-State as. Jarrett Holden, indicted for
selling liquor on the day of the Municipal election
tried before the Court-adjudged not guilty.
In the case of Thomas Flvnn, convicted with four
others, for assauting and robbng Mr. Henry Hop
kins of the sum of SS4, at house of ill-fame, on
the Point, Mr.. Cowan, his counsel, stated that he
withdrew the motion for a new trial, heretofore
MED. Flynn was then put at the bar and sentenced
to be confined in the Penitentiary for the term of
live years."Susan Russell, who was convicted
on the Both day of September, 1859 for crueIlv
treating her step-child and sentenced by Judge
Stump to one years imprisonment in iail
and fine of $40 and costs, was brought out.
and upon her swearing that she was unable
to paw the fine, was discharged by the Court
w hen the Grand Jury came into Court judge
Bond remarked that he had understood that they
had summoned before them a member of the bar
who had been questioned and consulted by them
upon points of law. The Court would remark that
the states Attorney was the proper person for the
Grand Jury to consult upon such questions, or if
tins Grand Jury bad not confidence in the States
officer. then it was their duty to apply to the
Court for any information involving questions of
law. If the Grand Jury had lost all confidence in
the Court or States officer their proper mode of
preceding was by indictment against them.-
George N. Eaton, Esq, one of the Grand Jurors,
replied to the Court that member of the bar had
been summoned before them as a witness, but not
for the purpose of getting opinion on points of
law, and that during his examination questions
were propOunded to him incidentally by one of the
jurors, involving certain points of law but in sum-
monlng him the Grand Jury had such purpose
In view as stated by the Court-They were then
discharged until Friday morning, and until which
time the Court adjourned.
SUPERIOR COURT-JUDGE MARTIN
Anne Cunditf Us. The Northern Central Railway
Company. Action to recover for loss of a negro
Judgment for 81 Goldsmith & Seth uS. Maltby.
Agreed.-Schulte us. Baltimore and Ohio Rail-
road Company. Setted.-Bradley &c. as Me-
Rea. Judgment on ms.-Hedian, &c. Us.
Thomas. Judgment for property.-State US.
Northern Central Railway Company. Demurrer
to plea sustained and judgment for plaintiff
Court adjourned over until Friday ay.-Assign-
ment 433 to AGO inclusive.
Nothing done in the CoURr OF COMMON PLEAS or
Cry CIRCUIT CoURT. Both Courts adjourned over
until Friday.
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT C0URT-JUDGE GILES
John ). Wright, use ofMaxwell, Wright & Co.
vs. Sun Mutual Insurance Company; and same us.
Orient Insurance Company. Action policies
Before reported. Not concluded. Brent and Nav
for plaintiffs; Brown and Bruno and Hamilton, of
New ork, for defendants,