New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-05-17

,,stcr Democrats than he was The fate Of the Amer
lean reople was involved in this Issue. IL the doctrine
ofinierventon prevailed, the "iTepressble conflict
would continue until one section was subdued by the
other. or obliged 10 separate in order 10 live quietly
Nor.ntervention is the only principle that will enable
us to live together barmonousy. II the only banner
under which I'LL conservative men can unite.
Mr.. HALE moved that when the Senate adjourn,
be TO meet AT p. M, he understood
there would be- reception Of the japanese Tomorrow
Motion Loot by yeas liz nays, u.
MIR, DAVIS RAID that when the Senator from Illinois
rose TO sneak he said that he intended to the
indictment of mot done So" lie lDouglas) had
clnimed association with Clay, but he Davis world
show that that association did not belong to him. The
old jackson party too would be surprised to hear Thai
Henry Clay was leader of the Democratic party.
Tie Senator's speech medley OF arguments
of men for ten years past, and he had rudely re-
fused 10 allow his misstaenrents TO be corrected
lie set out with arraignng everybodys consistency.
He arraigned not only individuals but States Wnal
bad all this to do with the question Nothing! II
was mere pretext to indulge in idle defamation and
10 excite sympathy for himself as prosecuted man.
He asked Finn tDouglas if he (Davis had ever pro-
posed, surprising his wing OF the party SUCCESSFUL
10 exclude he other wing from NIL possession OF oice.
Mr. DOUGLAS said as he bad been prescribed, NO
supposed his friends were inclnded.
Mr.. DAVIS reminded him ihat when he was re-
moved from the Chairmanslp OF tue Committee ON
Territories he Davis offered him the Chairlnnshlp
of lie Committee he held. He took Mr.. Douglas to
task for assuming regal airs and debating to tue De-
mocracy the platform on which he would consent TO be
elected lie explained the doctrine of Mr.. Case and
that of Mr. Douglas TO show that they were different;
hat that Of the former logical and that OF the lat
was not 70.
The Senator from Illinois lad shown himself pro-
foupdy ignorant Of the affairs of Mississippi or the
history OF events that had occurred there IL was not
true that Mississippi in 1851 endorsed the doctrine OF
pon-iteryention. The Southern Rights party OF that
State were no; the Secession party His votes in Con-
rress were in pursuance Of the instructions OF his State
Other questions were involved in the canvass OF 1859
beeide the Compromise Measures. When the STATE
Convention of Mississippi met it was composed OF "a
majority of the allied Submissonts IL passed re.
solutions which did not sustain the views as expressed
by the Senator from Illinois.
'Mr. DAVIS then referred to the action OF the
Charleston secedeIs and denied Mr. Douglass state,
nent that they contemplated dsunion. He opposed
the nroposed arrangement that two sections of the par
tv ST ou)d ignore the divisions of the Supreme Court,
and in the mean time divide the spoils. Every man
was bound to have opinion, and he should boldly
declare hs prime piles aud not seek 10 ml-l ad or de-
ceive the peopie The Senator from lilinois ike
| witness on the stand who commenced at the deluge,
had gone oVera vast amount of ground but had not
come down to the present time. The Supreme Cont
han made all the decision il could make ON political
| question and il was now necessary that public men
should declare their sentiments. The Supreme Court
| had passed upon the political question at Issue
Without concluding the Senate went into Executive
| Session. Adjourned.