New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-07-11
Id w LNZ,ELLIGEINCE
SUPREME CoURT-CHAxBKRs-JuLr lO.-Bsfore Justice
IxGRAHAM
THE WEST WASHINGTON MARKET CASE.

SUPREME CoURT-CHAxskms-Jurr io.-Bsfore Justice
ISGRAHAx.
THE WEST WASHINGTON aARKEr CASE.
In the course Of Judge Edmonds's argument in this
s SS & b ss ss Ss d TsSy jy s
Why asssi the Of the Land One Nsssr
IL To this city twas Of no what disposition Of the
property made between the state and Its essees t
vas Gifts business Could good cause require such
Now that the question Is dragged n and scattered broad
The interest Of the The subject new to all Sf
one one tool two NO he tue W
toaow reward to th party making the d'eOyeIy and taking
not formerly the custom to give 0nethrd onehah to
Judge Eimopds concluded bis argument to-day.
M Noyes followed in behalf Of the Controller The following
II Thee tc&sSe s Rs. sotRcS his duty 70 apply to
the COur. to Sc. aside a. asns the ety i Re BE-
water ct al agt The Msyor ae 10 How r. s7si MacOm-
Der ags s.ae,M Dsly Ts rg FEB q 1851
the West , Market RGpy SfS,e a.. and WITHOUT
their pOsseson the Judgment. obtained sg.n
the tenant: the City By default and under an
has since continued 70 be same udan.
been voluntarily Jsrni against the Receiver
July 1889 restoring possession and directing the Receiver to
pay the rents and profits received by hin 70 the City Treas
siysady been decided IN favor Of the city,
suit or TO abandon the tight trial under the
statutes and such waiver and abandonment were cohaave and
v He had no authority voluntarily to appear take eps
in the name the city in the action brought y syor aga
October a. 1889 inssmueh as no had been served and
and fraudulent ard only advance the wishes and pro-
mote the interests Of Taylor which proved by he reference
fs az S hs aoi4P d
the indecent haste by which all the proceedings and the trial
vNcT had Is Authority v.Iauts.s e appear Or aas
The same day the last by Ta Brennsn TO recover
sgss Ste % q The ps%s s and sRe a., Sn
October 1883 nssmuch no process had been served and be-
& and md gppe and n
and promote the interests of Taylor brennan 10 tn SUI
which e s ss S sI By be co
seng everything they wished and BY like haste in the pro-
VII The action of eec:ment upon verds and judgment
in which saen 1s Se5 sG no b Sr the the tile
10 the property been pTese1.tsd e any Of Ieh Weight
Entertain doubt about the validity q their ttIe as pre-
1Rf % g nd ,S to q %sIS
81 orc 3 T s Tat plaintiffs ~os sSSs
verdict" with the stipulation entered in;o the 9Th No.
W viz % sasidI ri ''s g ~
SUPERIOR couRT--caAxnrRs-Jrrr lo.-Before Justice
SUTHERLAND.
DECISIONS.
James McArhuragt. Catherine Macarthur Reports
Before Justice INeRAHAM.
Ai,,, maria DAo"4 "e' -
United STATES COMMISSIONERS OFFICE-JuLY TO-
Before Commissioner NEWTON.
THE ALLEGED SLAYER KArE-ExAMISArIoS OF CAPT.
-, e NJ -, O..o A. ouaoa5 am
Inc examination % rfeoer,oA 49, t, ~ $3.50 u -
tain bark Kate under arrest on charge OF Dng engaged
in the slsyerade, was continued at y oseek To-Day
size but apparently strong and active and intelligent He
with interest to the proceeding and frequently made
suggestions to his counsel 10,
Thomas j. Brown. officer OF the Custom tssghsd
that be went down IN the cutter Harriet Lane ana ne
bark Kate the Southwest spit and there Yep. 'o .n9
prisoner sid to him b. was going to IN. Coast ., & ana
after he hsd arrived AZ DIS pr 81 % sconsble The canan
tnhs w.n @ ~ h; ,so the over Of the rark was and