The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-06-05
HEYaOnIST GENERAL cmfEEcgCE.
rvruTy TaIRp DAYS PROCEKDIEGs

YN ENTY IHIRD UAl % fhoOEhAhNNS
xxanrnArios OF THE sLAvsnY D scUusl oS-h
pIgLp ON ThE "RRerRBs5InLE CosFLicf
..o yaR "HIsaBR LAw"--oPlCY RkrbY Or III.
sIIusR or BALris0aE-rsB ssETEGes IN AN 0P'
ss.k- rHE PsoPcsBD NEW RULE Loss FOR wAar
or A CONSTITUTIONAL hAJOsIrY-aDoruos oF
ne Oh prEa DsoL AIRING The HOLDING OF SLAVES
4 - BE SINFUL, Erc, ETC.
BusslIo, Nay Is 1860
a BolMzs Of Pis;s0ars offered o,uson fAyor
= s>spg the slavery repors "Wednesday,
wssss gave rise 10 . spicy debate.
- NJ HOLMES remarked that he o. toe q r.iy;
AAs he Was tired Of speech maxim and sSsy 10
Asve speeches similar to delivered by minority
- en- ~ want 70 hear them
NJ spcz maintained that the passage Of she reseiu-
ssa wssd be equivalent calling the previous qoes
M, ana therefore he opposed II.
NJ snAHr, II Detroit, made An Amusne speech, re-
nah q .sA.the minority, who wont 70 cry Peace
psaee,n would give the church pescs pus
ssastS ~ taxing he caorch.
n. noDGsos, Of Pm Isdephia, defended tbs Minority,
sAsorvsg hAt n truth or fsi In ihs
nsss Of she last sse.ksr seemed that, a.er al hey
hs serder) no great ami Asvery sgsAors IN
ths East ana Nostpwes; the Ino desired peace
- could Hos have n BE piuca tnem, add II ina. sere
- - cekgAsss from tho Border oagn 10 60 down upon
d DAVIDSON said they could gain nothing by farther
ssssen q tbe resolution before sne, and msved
- nAsAsxe poetponement Of the matter, which
ne by vote Of o. 70 %.
ASlsr iAk dsoAGs was Concluded Some unmportant mis-
esknss0D bsainsn vas dAcussed-
ffsf SLAVERY DISCUSSION RrsrxED.
- nsesn = Rev. Mr. Moody, ,he deoss on the slavery
d.. CzARy, having obtained the door Friday pre-
osede1 70 cay sentiment had 70 do with the
QnsUona lA~ Tho first part OF ms speech vas 40
Ssss nstaph yscsl He favored tbs report OF the
- psAss - The church. vas % slavery - sysen
- sejecsed, and not us mere acciden1 He mennoned
= No. I'm an article from tao Baltimore Advocate,
w. stated thaf "in all candor We tsn them that
n Dss the doctrine OF (BAumore) Conference that
sAavsssaoipG y . sin" He asked n the law OF the
Owssspcs haA decided that the motives which sctnated
svshodaPs SHOULD not be nvesga edY In reply 10 the
sases bss majority favored the violation Of the law
q ths sate, no SAID that human Laws that we're
sssEOy 70 The laws Of God ought net 70 % the
sossoard Of morals the church The QaAkers re-
I'D we're they considered rebelss II Was sAid thai
uue sentbs Of the slaves came oy inheriance bat he
nheA what becomes VI tho cnidrenY II was also said
al shave holders compelled 70 hold slaves but DO
Asssd hat any such comparison existed II they want
get rid OF the slaves, why AID they mob aoohaonist
posleFs Of books when they went down south
PMO & BENNETT, Of Wisconsin, favored the adoption
e ~ majority report, because clearly expressed the
oeanens the church the subject he said the con
Of the church and the spirit OF this ruiz had
naUays seternmed that n just ~ wrong 70 hold
shvss q 70 buy sell them He advocated tho msjo
- sonauct which the Border bre,hreo had all along de
Snged hey pursued This agitation differed from tho
nDssS agitation Of 1884, In that the majority would never
nssses for they did not carry their point nov, hsy
vsuh continue astate till they obtained the victory
Wsuh the minority declare their Intention - airmA
,1v.l,9 fbe agitation was called fansucsm.
A abs POINT PRfsDsSr Interrupted the speaker by
hluRNng that tho Conference was adjourned by time