New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-06-06

hIED LIFE.
John Walton sgt Ellen VI Walton
This was a suit for divorce n mensd 81 M0ro on
the ground Of cruel ard nhuman Treatment Which rendered i
II supeared that the plaintiff ~ealthy disler in Twenty
G Street hi, e,id- being ia Twentytni,d street AZ the
time Of the marriage the LADY boadinzh Keeper
who according her statement mad been led twice to the
ena altar and had been deprived OF both her riners py
the children OF her rst husband Jeher aud me tnid was
the child second husband Captain Russell She also sta
ted that she had little girl IN the country an adoptel niece
The plaintiff claimed hst the lady had made - repesens-
tons h that instead # being married twice che had been
married three tines and toat according belief the second
husband Who named Morrison was yet living IN the Stse
Ohio he Lece niece but he child the Offspring
Of famed ielouton The plaintiff thea ALLEGED tha the
deiendant vas lady Of s:rGnS passions ana an rspa S
her consent brought mpopr Company 10 ms house and tHt
The sdy herself pit improper PnJ and went TO houses u
The defendant the complin the ground that
II wss technically defective and tat did not comply with tue
sn,, Which rqu that the paied should be dei-
ny stated and the times and circumstances vain SON; degree
Decision reserved
D. d. Held FOX Plaintiff. A Oakley Hall for defendant
THE RECORD COMMISSION.
The suit Of McSpedOn and Others against the men,
hers of the Board of sur the calendar this
ing Int consequence the of counsel it was
''E''''' j JUNE 5-Beore Justice SUTHERLAND.
WIDENING or GRAND sTREEI-INJuNCIIuN AGAINST
THE COMMON COUNCIL.
Thomas Suiiern The Mayor. &c
In this ease the plaintiff claimed that he was the
SSick street in Asy last Committee streets Of the
board Of ounCmen presented report stating that after care
southerly side Broadway to Varck street
The paiuta Gained that the Conn ttee on sir'e Of
the BosrGs the Common Coun ri had unawuy conpired
the of this reoiJn and that no no:e Of their
poro alteration though majority opposed
f akd for injunction 10 restrain the defendants from
pressing eiy resolution OF the nature referred 20
yle d-erdaps d-uuued to the Jurisdiction Of the Court
claim III The Court could not restrain the legislative ac
the Common Council no matter what the motives for such
acton might be-
D. D. Field io plaintiff; II. A Anderson Assistant Corpora
''O'' CnAmnETs~JGne5 Before Justice BosxKY
FAMILY DIFFICULTIES.
Ann Eliza Humphreys 's Francs oay Mary Bersh
II appears that the plaintiff is daughter Of the late
Mr. Samuel Noteworthy highly respectable merchan, Of THIS
diy who died IN 1873 leaving large property mostly in real
c1ic in this city estimated TO be worth million Of dol
to ito Si and his oihe1 children ior er r~e
end to ter children IN fee after thei, deaths ,uegt % ne
anared an sgent February, l'i' the plaintiff executed
to Rche skdore, brother Of her motbe who on the fol-
lowing day conveyed the same property to Tunis BERN me
aesth heir children subject Only {" rent charge OF 800
yeai payebl- the Plith out Of tn estate Teans Begh
died ia 81 aud TIE plain ID ater AID ariird Mr. Humphreys
"a greed taa at the time of the execution the
decd Teun beIgh and he plat til. his vie had been sop
o Lu. and ibs "iin few days ate the execution Of The
decd Mr Eeg went to EnsL'nd where 'e remauei hnil
tens DteIcu-. ib her family, aud at The had action
pending against the agent OF the estate, to due her
Ifc Isn,a recently commenced two aon' aside
lie d.tds md for al accounting &c. and this l. moi
potion the plaintiff pending he suits 1t appear. by
he papfs iced the motion that the s aans; the agent Of
he estate accounting so pa ed Tor divorce in favor Of
Leigh tie of her bGslauds aud
cruelty that her husband aterward brought sui. st
ier To- divorce IN which de pissed asait her in
a-.rce months atrr she went to England.
I be plaintiff drIi, having authorized IL io divorce,
having known f the second soft AID divorce i=-nst
LeIs. The ,xssLce The deeds uuti Of hes
dire yttd them among the records WITHIN months past
and She a that her Signature procured to the m d.d
by fraud AID aei God ta all her children in number had
been pr, ou.ly tken from her ard had them
that she wen of TO England in
order that el hurnd might obtain fictitious decree divorce
her and hex family nj. avoid her society and that sh.
il suffering from extreme poverty with two children de-
psIdsii upon her
The ceendants who the her and children
the uuti produced their in which
they aleg that the plaintiff the in question
clas and also several aidayis upon riornati
relief, ten ding to he point and claim that the deeds
executed iaiily settlement vi the divorce suit
Tire piainih'. counsel In reply this insist that has
bone tie reputation OF uchdsiiy except in connect
with her pien husband pio to their marriage and aer her
separation Lefg that that Is untrue and thi the
pi,hf la, aiwsys lived spOr- life ais that tue deeds
void both because their execution and Of
c"sie elton aid Tic plaintiff II eiore Receiver
4 ne Judge TO- 4 the pris for sdvisement
tuil-I Iid5al eh FOR pau,l Waterman Lstting for
defendants.