The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1860-07-09

Sta
mentS that may be unpleasant truths but they are
nevertheless. How can Judge Douglas put himself u
fore the Democracy of the country when he knows ar
every man in his foowinr knows hat his "a;
durn the last fonr or Ave ,nont hos been as disti
from the Democratic organization as his nomination
From the two days in which he delivered his eigl
hours speech mn to the resant time his nresence h,
darkened the door of the Senate of the Unite
States Who v,s Lis snnLes,,an ond r,rIor,onS Co.
| E. Pugh of Ohio. and in New Yort on1v the dav b
fora ID my, - u Ia NJ" oih, oh'y tie uay u
s G Es ne announced the Iaet TO the DeInocrac
r;d%n he sar ~ ''' hlnGo.H anu precAl.
do h.ns % Tai no tht =, anu shey can MN enocra
w W. my ieii llat story 10 old women and children
was ths ~ % it LUZ &c ~ Dou9IaS Is a democrat! "h
When men were so oe! - .ne aiherican army
dence of tIesa thirtan fIoH;eis, wien 'ie lhuePeh
Iost boo ~ si sn coIohlts was thought TO nave DeeI
| Noto ~ ,s We eouu not make an impression upon tn
eis "orueffn~ho was the man that had th
Sea W 1p ~ Was Ie man tat mad the nerve and thu
desert. vbo croesad 80; az @ a. panu thtoug
S VINO CROSSED rivers where there were no fords
us through the sparsely cultivated forest? Who, bu
~ neneuic' aArhoiq' VINO ior consideration which h
never got, sold the of liberty and of America
man may be one thing at time, and different thin,
te next but the Democratic party is party of princi
Pe. II mas Deeh the party o the Union, because th
ehocratc party mas stoou, not upon the Constitution
puI IL mas heid the Constitution in its hand Applause
ana mas sworn carry out the provisions of that docu
ment hat has been the distinctive difference between
e Deocratic party ana all others in this country?
mas understood what was the form of government unde
whch we were liyng-it has known that there nt
% Peope as the people OF America-that there was NJ
i uon oolninuhN as the American community-it ha
. teIe were 90, separate and sovereign, and in
| S'''S' NuhJoHeu tOSelner-d0u III mas knOWl
a oSe states were as independent. and sovereign
anu as separate and as distinct, France and England
S EuiS aIe-that t4ey are confederated together-tha
.hey nave entered INTO treaty, and by that treaty
ey are enabled 10 exercise their sovereign powers
JlsS- ihaI Is "nat tne democratic party has under
tooui IAPla9se II Is the very principle upon which
heS nave acted ANA why IS 1t that we have had OF
ten III uouolous tlmes, 10 pour the oil of peace
upon the waters to quiet them? 1t was because they
utrsoou that great and important political fact ant
"Iat was thlsf
say 10 YOU ThethGr 1t was accident or the providence
| IL H.
% " ' ihuePenuence, estaolshed put one single col
anu ~ PEOPLE Ui Inat co,ony had declared their in
~ r n, a auoPteu d constitution Such as the peo
Sontb Car tht u Tr le peoPe oi MasSachusetts oil
years t. =; ta Ioery Couid hot nave survived ten
dated Democrat r Rbii 'naa one single conso
over connt III al 81 nPupcan government can exist
and from The tin,f u.s. from te Lakes to the Gulf
tonight Union , 10 tne Hn racine; proclaim myself
man am now anI nay an an the time Deen mon
the best and the wse"t y o"9 not lpeheVe II Is
ingenuity of man has aysr 49,, Vi government that the
each State ia fire., IN raonIata is Au why because
| wav e'"'e i'S own auars In Its own
| You are n Democratic ,,ao,I,. ,.o,, ,. -, ~
ton Won introducrd in vnmr Ststa ,e Iohstltu
powers They sut Won Gentlemen INT tba. .s ~ 81 ill an
Beransa Won bar t ~ ] - sas then
Son ana If WOW had a poI W resst iorelsn aggres
and the other States had adonted sunnjsmentaI
tntion b,, rLioh I, ~ noJ i -, ippieheItai Sohst "a
sovereign mower that were nor ncornorad in bt nv
stitution Won tno, Wit III I - in Al, at ooti ",
But in thst CadaraI Tnion or bstJ e @ ',u ~ Il
cnnd interf ith Inn DtSaoM ca no P4Me's Una
reserved 70 .onh So 80 - ~ ~ EMS. iou nav
.n,i' ~, - . So PSo'eeiS su0i powers as are pc
mon 70 % al th nu Sou nave gwen tose powers com
menii w ai 'ne 10 te feueral Government. Ih
par mas planted lSell at all times wher
th mah Ihe euera Government to exercise only
from ePrercin tbosa bih anu reralhe'
| rba EadanaI r r .' 80 - :. - ~ nv
cy hos h 90 in tle IahuS ol Tue DehoGra
a Dee 50 as never 70 produce any dis
,bat ~ anu u II i've wtle; py Gnlon man, meat
e1ati,ti ~ m p. % chion Vi - o'-the tho" voted py TN
befnr M W u 49, W 'oe @ @ uown 10 tle Practca question
mo boS o,o. ~ nm @ W W % hnp" iiuch petter thah you at
necessity nf avan ,I'dir 49, 80. a. 20 20 & e'I ihe rom III
uecessy OF even auulhg 10 most OF them But there
which thr ~ 'a it 1 " pe anu s!uafely aDou
ha 80, 10 M, iist anu d wrong. hlliy fatIerson ma
and tbat i Tho ~, Iueso s VINO h'G blly patterson
areat deicnit ht ' o'nis 10, II IS sau tha TN
81 IN aoo"t 'he matter was that we OF tn
@ uu I?I eooSe 10 support Judge douglas. Sup
| Grant th,+ W.T. Ii pPO VIC W. VII "ionB aoout II
| 1910 the Dcmocratc uart bnd t 2ou ;2 SGae I' u
| II bod i,,st 10y I - pS % ed'eu 'i,e Poisoheu roo'
hoa JI J 81 .I. % dn. the american Peopi
"u leueleu thelr Verdlct against Martin van Buren
IaPpiause ihey attempleu 10 ram Maftih van bnfe
"oMn tle thIodts Oh the american people The conse
quen1e qT ISen wasi = we were were peasen. zen
,i "a 80 e poPe p' ntteei VI tne ooGtherh states
Stsnba 4I " ','o io eiouis 'ates'say una
.ePieh ~ bouslds Is pm winch, SuSar-Coat MN a
t ,Gt' tey Goua not ana wo9iu not swallow
A.auSnter lhey met IN convention; There were dele
Sas from te Daahce OF the States, who after the other
dH zone out declared that they would nominate can
..tI, ?"u @ ma. we sHail support MN Ihat wore
sud sm'' Is snort "oru put 1t means a good deal One
I ed t a i1ofSe 10 tle water, nut hundred canno
EtL nm mn utihh: lLauShterl Mr.. Douglas and IN
h iau SoV AT ISSUE ana am not gong to discuss tn
st,,rt Ii va - ne ne sw'le 'hey wpuiu no
where we @ the d S%@an we saG o he
ha5 as we cannot agree about tins matter OF cor
T u,iue 'ie meal ana hlng the gum INTO tn
=, me proken Gonventlon mere nominated Douglas an
ten nominated ola Fltz but ttz would not do He wa
100 ou trout 10 bite at such bait Fitz saw them boil
bs %as anu anu ooopihg. [ugh was Dooong along with tn
aI anu that Fltz lying quietly In the stream
o'oAns ms ms Wouiu make Dlte Dut SAID fltz, ae
% fey"s cautiously 1 am AFRAID II ain duck ae
an, ana n were to bite, and be mistaken might fir
my mouth cnoke tuli OF nothing nut tish-hooks am
@ S az; aaushern lP9n winch he hnaliy backe'
-, an ~ uI mTt o' men HeIsGheI was scared up IRON
uit e pahsi s anu struck tle pait ana thlnk ne ht
got ms mouth hiled with fish hooks and feathers Laugh
teF) powh Where i've they call him treeater, ant
my irend, Bill fancey, called the theatrical perform
ance in Front street that OF the bogus Democracy Ant
efschel came and ollered himself delegate, and
they would not allow him to take seal in their Conven
@ @sloh alenouSh ne is on their ticket lLaughter Thi
concern down al Front street sent Georgia hOpn
| TO get stevens on the line, but he was too old s
~, anu Mo"iu no. 1y tuuch the h9oks ana feathers Ate
Ia ai, &c 81 t, sts, ,ec"use ne saiu mat II the
u nav Ill the oohFehtion they could have defeated
WI Douslas COMMUNICATING Douglas was so 0diOuS
anu had such Douhtlul lack OF popularity, that h
coGu never De nominated ana therefore advised the sc
cetetS 10 return lLaushtef-l And thus ended the frs
act vi Johnson drama at the front street Theatre. Th
LINZ Ling & maj we near OF herschel was, that he ant
IN. ~ ~ T seteiaI I III neorBia' were not quite as Pfu
SoI S Y, W. inN Wv olieis IN Hlaoaha anu tiert
auu S'le V'heIs III LOUISIANA Out tley went mt
u I'anioiS anu hdue sIeechesi anu wrote heWspape
Whsn, anu anu went dn. TO the & polls
81 " i my vent Ih'o ts otaIe CONVENTION IN georgia
| minority nIatform and H. uara ~ M anu III VI
| bv Dos 70 A. votes Irst @ m 80 ro'e" u1m low
| were hoo tbcv wont o,d ossa,nLr,5 :; ''ie.
| and tt.n Ii -. ~ "tt @ Sseii".eu Ill siniii room
| tinns and nomirotaI tI,a,sai,,n, ~ -
| t;mnre Conyortinn rba,, go" 10 - me Pa Pa
came the DonyIas mon vsra actnolitr asha1od ~
thano rtor tb, hod raS,,saJ , -. a., ~ eIetN "
ata fro, ~ Io'i3 Ia - aIt W aunt , 'iie s ies ular ute
con, mild r,an, a,ter 80 nots to I anu " 81 @ y @ i"
and the SonIbern states UitLdraw ana Cayie1rna a,
Oregon went with them and Iarge noron or tbn 1eI
cations from Massachusetts and Other Northern states
these men GOT in and then thev procended m nominate
and Hersche Johnson tbe h6ous deIagate to So bn~s
Convention was afterwards in Washington nominate,
hv COMMITTEE ~ bslf do1eIn rnon os hn,Sa 1 hiit
when wsnt IN schoo Tera ,yas rno, ba ran - a,
Irshman though such stories are eneralIv attributed Il
the sons Of the Emerald Isle who hanneneI to he tcbe
and he cot mn ono ayr ard ead 10 or rs IA TiI "a
| 90 foot sir H icoLld 'I,r aoi ~ % u 80 1, ped ] th %
1i,tuTbapc and s. I'm P 1s%rA upoi SUM otlle m
Us 80, i % Sa I'M " "olh ne Sa'u' JIM yo
st '''" A'"n anu so 'ieS nave put ilerschei oeo'
| 'o0T, m,
THOUGH not exactly in order it may not be entirely in
pertinent TO expose the lnconslstences or Mr. DougE
Win WIN hlhseH aI various umes ana with MT Johnson
an !es: ne c'ahs .lat sovereignty resides IN tne II
hapltants OF the tertory-that Is the rlght OF sego
nnePenuehI vi ieuerd cohToi. let the hans
Dhl declared tat II created temporary government
mat Congress reserved the power at any time to dvit
the territory ana attach 1t or any portion of it to
other territory The act declared who should vote at Il
first election and who should be eligible to office. Dot
this recognize sovereignty in The people of territory
Mr. Douglas is for intervention when it aids eSosn
| property of the South.
So much for his consistency with himself-how staut
he and his candidate for Vice PRESIDENT Mr. Jobnss
wrote and presented in the Georgia Convention late
assembled to appoint delegates to the Batmore
| ton, the following resolution
Resell That the citizens of the United States hav
equal light to settle with their property of any kim
in the organized Territories of the United States and th
under the decision of the Supreme Court of the Unite
States, in the case of Dred Scott, which recognize
the correct exposition of the Constitution partic
lar slave property stands upon the footing as
other descriptions of property, and that neither the Gel
erai Government nor any Territorial Government ca