Wilmington journal. [volume] (Wilmington, N.C.) 1844-1895, 1860-03-29
Supreme OnlninnS.

By Pea1 son. 9. j. In Hayes VS. Askew, from Hert
ford Judgment reversed and venire novo Owens VS.
Knsey from Currituck affirming the Judgment Rod
man gaylord, from Beaufort judgment reversed and
venire de novo. n. r. Nav Comply VS. Commissioner
of Newbern, from Craven Judgment reversed-iudg-
ments here for defendants. Town of Lousourg Har-
rs from Franklin judgment reversed and vcnire de
Dula VS. Cowles from Wilkes, jud gment reversed and
venire de novo. In Doe dem, WelbOn VS. Fnlay
from Wilkes, affirming the judgment. Turner Elfrd
in equity from Stany dsmissing the BILL Steward vs.
Stowe In equity, from GastOn directing decree fOl
plaintiff. Suggs vs. Stowe in equity, from Gaston de-
cree for an account VS. Stowe Wiswall VS. Potts, in
equity from Beaufort, directing decree Emmons VS.
McKessons in equity from Wake the motion to dissolve
allowed. Berry VS. Sloan, in equity, from Orange re-
port confirmed, costs to be paid by plaintiff feathers
Scott in equity from Orange allowing the plaintiff to
have account Poson VS. Gillespie, in equity, from
Rowan, directing decree for plaintiffs. Townsend Ar
mold Co., VS. Moss, in equity, from Mecklenburg de-
cree for the smallest note. Davidson Hutchinson, in
equity from Meckenburg declaring that there no er
rOr in the order
BY Battle, J. In Prldgen VS. Anders from Baden
affirming the Judgment Stricklin vs. Murphy from Du
pin, affirming the Judgment State vs. Oscar from
Rowan, declaring that there is in tue proceedings
of the Superior Court. Cockerham VS. Baker from
Surry, affirming the Judgment Fite VS. Lander from
Castor, affirming the judgment. Harrington Nc
Lfau, IN equity from Harne remanded with leave
to amend. Capehart MhOon, in equity, from BERTHE
plaintiff may have benefit his secondary equity against
administrator and his sureties. McRae VS. Guion, in
equity from RObeSOn reversed in part and ordered to
be certified. Thompson VS. Guion in equity from Robe
son, demurrer sustained and bill dismissed. King VS.
Galloway in equity, from Brunswick, sustaining the
demurrer and dsmissing the bill. Williamson VS. Viii
hanson, in equity from Wilson, dismssing the petition
to rehear Fuller VS. Smith i'll equity from Caswe tive
cases) decree for plaintiff in each. Webb Webb in
equity, from Granville Dbble Scott in equity from
Lenoir Myers vs. Williams, in equity from Rowan
exceptions overruled and report confirmed Wood VS.
Reeves, in equity from Rowan, demurrer overruled.
By Manly, j. In FELTON, VS. Reed, from Perquim
mans, affirming the Judgment Grandy VS. Humphreys
from Camden, affirming the Judgment Freshwater vs.
Baker from New Hanover, affirming the judgment
Freshwater vs. Nichols from New Hanover, affirming
the judgment Bire Kelly, from BIaden, order to be
reversed Coward vs. Fields, affirming the Judgment
Crowel VS. Simpson, from Union, judgment reversed
and venire de move. Haywood VS. Ryalls, in equity
from. Wake, sustaining the demurrer Draper Knox &
Co. Jordan in equity from Montgomery dismissing
the bill. Branch VS. Branch, directing account
Adderton VS. Surratt, in equity from Davidson dismi
sing the bill with costs Cawley VS. Kawson, in equity
from Lenoir, directing an account Caldwell VS. Wal
lace in equity fro Meckenburg, order to be reversed
! RaL Press