The Alleghanian. [volume] (Ebensburg, Pa.) 1859-1865, 1860-08-23
Register assa Recorder.
p az &c Of T2s AAeghamtan

70 the Editor Of The Ahegha"tan'
lt eppenrs that the "CAairmen OF the Re-
publican County Committee has seen I'll ~
contiuas the controversy with :egnrd 80 the
proceedings o. the late County Cohfenttoa.
Although he does not accept O! The generous
proposition / made him through tie columns
0. the Tribune" O compliance with which
would have secured you the profits OF printing
! 900 copies Of the first article, one halt ~ ny
expense, yet he IS c0as.terate enough nct 70
impose HpOG your good nature ~ asking yol.
ErGtuiJous!v, 70 publish e long reply. 4tis re
pig IS necessarily sLCr', and he las evidently
acted up0n tie principle THAR when q Inau has
not much 10 say IL IS letter 10 say bur little.
However, in his case, perhaps, 1t would have
Ueen better 10 have said nothing
lie appears to think i: was uakiud in me 10
blame an innocent party with writing his
first article. Ia answer would say, i Nj
Roberts really did write il ! did wrong IN at
tempting TO fastcn the disgrace upon an lnno-
cent man However, it is unimportant 10 The
issue who wrote the first article As 10 the
last one, am perfectly willing 10 agree th'i
Air. Roberts wrote it, and AIN sure every man
in Cambria county who is suspected Of being
able TO write article III ter publication VIII
thank me for so doing. COuceding that hr.
K. wrote the last article VIII release ali other
! writers from being suspected OF being guilty
| Of writing an article which Gbounds in logic
| conclusions which ale unsurpassed by any
| other article Of equal length which mas ever
! appeared IN aTy newspaper IL thls or any 9th
! CT county. This IS SAYING a good deal, bat,
| in order to substantatc what l have said /
VIII candjdly review part of this learned
production.
| Passing over his introductory remarks, !.
/ which he truitlessIy attempts 10 be severe
upon me. / come to the lOEica! part Of the az
| ticie. lie informs the reader that he asserted
! two weeks ago Llet G.ty-live delegates voted
! m rg r~-r f..lfIf o. or
/ and tcIIcs me 10 prove tlct such was not TIE
| case. This I VIII DO soon as lie proves
| what lie has asserted. If the gentleman were
/ 70 accuse ne Of having stolen a sheep OF g
| having voted against V. I. Frazer Tor Jana.
! Commissioner, would it be necessary for Iue to
/ prove / had not done 500 The first accusation
/ might be difficult TO prove, but The second
/ would be easily done. l have never denied
! but haze always admitted that ] did vote
/ against the Honorable gentleman, and always
/ expect to vote against men VINO have 10 more
! regard for the interests OF tie people than TO
advocate and vote fol the Main Line swinGie.
Come, now, Howard, and call q little COM
/ mon sense 10 your alI, brighten - your ideas
! little, ana see u II would not he Det.er tlr
you 10 make good Ao4E assertions, bg 81 hat
/ used % be called proof ~ oU. ga-,.g... t.rEs
But y9H --y In :. NJ lat article t.-.t Yea have
proven it. Let Us examine how YOU have done
/ So Iou say You asserted two weeks ago that
/ E!ty-hVc delegates voted, and that YOU say So
4 .E.-
! - ~, - -, = =:
I Er.rIi.h ~ eszer,;,,,,, -. -, -,
NJ toy. ravor ovs,,,i,,lf 49,,
mar T,orIf ;,rs,If,- - . .I-i - r
/ ,--,,,r3 ~. - d., .,.,,-,r.;,--- - -
/ - - - W. "
,.-t..,.-s 49,. 80 T., '' 80 ~
/ --,---.- =. .-....-.l. - ,.,.,I- H.. -.
-, =, -. 80 -. - -
! 5.f.s -, .l, ..-. -: ~, - go ~ 80
,:.. -. -. - 'oo--s -
,1:,;,I t-r,,es - - -: -
ro,-,1l,- - -, 7.t ~ -
- ,EI -. 80 80 nv y
- ~. ~ - 81 " . ~, -
/ .ft'.~.t.a~- 7 .-, - a -, - - & an 81
- ,,,.io So = ~. io-
fr--- =, ,,,, -. - - D % -" 80 - Z
"a III - - - -: 49,, o'
+,, ,, -, NJ 49, IN - - my
rr.r c.,a,i+,. - I,,.o m ~
1,fs.-,,-. On ,.', - ,rf - ~
-, NJ H.. g.. - 49,. a.. - ~ a q
,,,.,.-:,,., ~ t,,, 81, - -, -. ,'-- - ;
~ - s5c..l,l -, 80 -
-, - e. -. - 80, - y "
r9re 5.orIi ~, D.. ,., -, - 80 :
. he,aft of nv ba4rrI, and ~ ts, - -.
that they caunot gge out Of auy boozs now now