The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-09-13

aCulcVtu ~ pst OF Tue 70 lemocEhtC Pt1Sv,
10 the ADMINISTRATOR Of democratic leaders, q ma
cheers u front Of platform say thai ar from IL
dissatisfied should be source Of pride and congra.ia
that he belongs to that great political organ;zatos
through whose fundamentally this govsrDmer. and his
Of infancy strength Of the great an, OF the st
This allusion 10 Mr. Douglas drew forth yocllsrous
cheers and three 2, ira for the Little Giant y what hrs
York and IN all sbe States north Of Mason ard Dxns
line, and throughout an the South, you nd
with another portion wha, 10 the necess..y for
such division Of the psrsyS Why you are tod ,sa'
srssTa the as nAnas q .oos
States In Other words thar tho Congress Of un.led
States shall depart from the great principle Of
oxtd bass Of settlement betw the North The Soeh
The purpose of 'nierposibg asrmatvefy d the Tern
citizens beg leave 70 your respec,f ADD careful
sttention for few momer "a whilst consider tho sies
tion that s pounded in this policy sought !, be
ipaugurated IN country, 70 what be eject of
Ito inquire whether II good faith the part of the
North or the sorth 70 dcpar from that pin Of
good either Of the union or on the contrary
whether persistence the demand for Copgr pro-
tect.oo w not unavotabiy lead 10 dismsmcermeot of
any party any section Of country You remember
fellow citizens the that TRANSCRIBED city
Of irss the @.sSmssse q We M
time--et me ak you--dd you ever hear syllable Of
complaint coming W .cm my quarter Of the unoa "a re-
(Cries Of aNo, non) Who demanded i2 WHO asxed it9
"a voice--"Jenerson Dsvisn) Was there anybody in
s n,a s M
cept the state Of Alabama ha. uttered word Of COM
plant. or ylablc Of demapd Upon he Convention
upon c,as for the nsuguratlc Of such policy o
no ask yoc, then, up 70 that hour, so far you
know belle se informed, do you no. that
the lres, rational democratic party was : anu q
voce--"Yes, Il wG.') That united . band OF
brothers North and South, (cres Of "Yeso aud Good
and that We perfectly understood each osherS We
thought that this grea, question Of agitation had found s
rercee upon thie basis or compro.se-,he doctrine Of
non inisTven:on-and that It not herceforth
disturbed And do you not believe, fellow citSeos, we
had RENAME. harmonious, II no schsm had been intro.
tUced at and 10 new demaut made upon the
democracy do jon believe that there would have been
single note Of ds-ord IN all the ranks Of The national
democratic party IN this contest? (Cries of MOI
DO you not believe that We would have marched
on 70 victory in this contest without doubt
tory in former contestsi (cries Of s'Yeso eyes y It
not slmost certainty that matter who might have
been the naIse q me Charleston Con ssn,lO hs had
States by the harmonious action of the delegates from
all the stes TIA. he would have gone before the coun
Of dscord, and that there would have been triumph
glorious than any Of the achievements OF the demo-
cracy In the pasu Why, fellow citizens, why II that
there acy drawbacks nterpcsed N progress %
victory Why, Alabama sends her delegates Charies-
tom demanding armanos Of the proposition tina, IL
FOR the protection Of slavery and ,has ID the event Of
refusal 70 that demand, the delegates from Alabama
should withdraw nom the Convent o ard their
sijstoas With the democratic party. Now, AK yol
fellow .tscosfor the purpose OF arriving Mt the policy
which probably Was contemplated by this movement
just 70 consider the position Of Alabama years
previous 10 this time. Ia 1850 the Democratic
State Convention Of Alabama, through their chairman,
reported and adopted set Of resolutions, one Of which
nGiructng the delegates from Alabama 60 the
CiDciDDa.i Convention and 10 demand the armauce by
that Convention Of the principle Of nonntervcnton, and
withdraw from the Convention. (ssThat's so'D That
was the position Of Alabama in 1854. just four years
sferwsrds, A.hama under the prsmptiDGs Of me same
leadership shifts her ground Her Democratic state Gun
ven,on nsruss her delegates 60 Charleston de
mapd what Not the doctrine OF Intervention, ia
rnand in,ervertop 70 demand Congressional protection
Ia the Territories and In the event OF this refusal "
withdraw from the Convention Now, fellow ctizens
yoa perceive at orcc that here perfect revolution Of
sentiment. | suppose II was hoped IN 1859 tnat the
National Dcmocrsils Convention in Cincinnati, woult
| t.rventioa, ana that Alabama would then hav
good ercese 70 withdraw But the Convention
glorossy north aud soath ali the Delegates from over
Stale IA Tie Cnlon voting harmoniously IN favor q III
Doctrine Of Don inssrvsntioa, which Aiahsua had q
volg,tiy agiisied dsappoinied tho leaders, and the
we're then furpished with an excuse TO IL OF 10 bolt
a voce-"wel! done y In 1876 has not The same Al
bapa her position she up ard deuisuG
entou Congress ona protection and her delegate
distracted - withdraw the event Of refusal
that delnanc in 1900 ID chareston ALBANIA succs, ~
IN sedncng 70 her cause large portion OF the delegate
from tbs southern staestts cotton stasr They uuitc
drew And ihereupon he ing portion Of the boz
proceeded 10 tho adoption e the cd Cincinnati platform
upor which had fought aud conquered IA s02 and
1860. But The Convention did not make nomication
or orrfspect 10 thcs. secedrg States AMI Ia
| The vecsncics created by this withdrawal night b
i Tiled, adjournment IL made W Baltimore. VI
! NJ there, and what "a meet Why, VI
del atons, the The other egsi ons ron
ssstIons APPOINTED ~ he nasonai sernorrs:s rroSr
VI 50 seeding States. Inc ng Delegates ara 10
\ nd IA ~anAg rc
prolectop and, IN the event o. tn rvecton u with
craw IRON uc Convention. fellow citssns, you re
believe they s1taaied by principle; ba' when N
CONDUCT Of Demonstrates that they have dev0to
praolpe b, are sc,.s.ed by che ooos.de.atIoas
| thci- s-tion. These roniendpg delegates assn
sled before ne COMMITTEES q creasnsials. IN
| nla ar r,,ected, asd he un.on delegations ar
sdIniIpi TIC secedtpg delegations from seorga ar
aoDrso-t checrs 'er voseiAs l-snd the Uniou deesa
And ~; siitEahdlas The soocdug delegations from
Georss, b. soern sote, are rrrsary admitted % toer
eeA1 they ~ that Convention Instructed
th.s fe1asnd ~ eopgrssoosl protection ard ~ III
vent q resasal Q wthdras yet hey toox offence
and Ala ana wiladrs~ from ihe Ionven,.os aud nevc
sought - theg demand lcr Congressional p-otcc
Mcr. ~. .esola'.Iy vent % upon mere qaienle
offence ~ . mere preliminary rarsmcn,sry ques
ton "a voce-"nfy up3 ''siss a. Douel.s !"
devotion prtclplef Why unl Ia the rcer "A
6 the proceedings u the Convention they would
have sr opportunity o. renewing the denarf, and have
opportunity Of conp Ing with tbs Instructions Of tho
Couventicns which sent them 70 the Co1vcn,on. Toe
truth H. tns they DID no, vail % anxious they a
produce IBIS rupture. They d.i not wat Tor the oppor
tune mcmebt 10 arrive wbeu would be IN order
sumo the iemaDd ihey we're Instructed u maze So~
AL you o 81 these facs, and W VEL wnst do yOu
spposd must have been the cnsns Of tbose who
mus produocd this schs ~ the great Democratic part,
Everybody knows and adm 10 that the democratic party
bad Temalcd united and harmonious victory would
have been certain--haf wo u have urmphcf In
canvass ~ ". Rave IN preceding ones. a foirc--
I'VE Viii triumph. y Bst, fellow cl,lrsus, shy
Il tAs sohisr9 IN order " show properly zoe
isacescy and prior policy u this movesnena, Il 10
vel !, isk q; tie actors the movement Nnc are
they Wby, f"AOv ctizers, tney eho. IA me
aa1, never bal ans proiessed o. have any 1.-Two.
TOO " the democratic party. (Hlpof," agooif They
who bad aud Who py0fcsser n have
sny dev0ton - The &c 90 o. tEe sates MAJ DO you
sgtg Ynu see this Convent on, tlese deesstes
semblpg 1t Hcbmons They a. there, and the I'm. X.
Rhsu &c u the lsAliey spiri's o. that Convcston
1nst COW, nilnn msca, resolves ~ a. )m dag
isy ilr &c sbs of the C1uxeDti1a II Beitmra,
vnst these ICED ng Delegations 10 HIATT more. IN
1T Il