davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
, 1860-10-05
TIE THREE NEBRASKA BILLS,


: On the 17tGaay Of February, 4. D. 1858,
Senator Douglas, as Chairman Of the Com:
mittce on Tersitorics reported TO the Senate
his first "Act to Organize tho Territory Of
Nebraska This act contained no repeal Of
the Missouri Compromise, and it failed to b.
como Law for want of time. Senator Atclli-
son. If Missouri, on the Sd day of March, 1851,
made some remarks on this bill, in which he
acknowledged that he had no hope Of eyer
seeing the Missouri Compromise repealed. he
said: .r
t'1 had two objections to this b4n~ One vas, that
the Indian little TO that Territory had hee1, exn
Eoshed, or 1t least but very small, portion d L. lad
is commonly called. The Slavery Restre,ion. ii
ny opinion n that ttu,e.-&nd MT very clenr
TN: subject that the law q cenfrss.. ~vn .he
State Of Missouri admitted Iao the Unlon, exclad
Ing d.very from e Territory Of Lousi.na north Of SO
daK 80 MIA, would be enforced n slst Ttsrory uzess
It fircai1y sxsc3nded snd whether that law VAS
In accordance With tho Constitution u the United StAes
OF not II would do III work md that work woull be
to preclude Shareholders from going into that Territory
But r9,en CAN'T to look into taat qsest.on, (nnd
1.at there tfas no Ero:pecf. no h9rs, gd rtpeA q
kdt Ixr44kory. Now, kr, am free to admit that It
tbs nomcnt II tts hour. and for al time to coe,
should opo<e the o1nizatoa or tie settlement Of that
Territory unlesa my constituents and The constituents
Of the xhtte South Of the ksTe States of the union
could 70 Inio upoa tic sAne fong, With equal rights
.rI equa} 1xalexf4 carrying hst species Of properly
1Nh thc.n ~ ather people Of tlia Onion. Yes Ar,
acknsxJe,.ce ,hat shst xopld bare governed but
1ast no Iops aat tho restrtettos tefA srer % re-
1,etsi2d.-
hare .~.s ben of s.A1,sn ths The r sst
sas ahs OrJinance of l1s7, rendering the Northwest
Territory ee tor, ThF asst e.e;St S x.3r @.s e
a1zs. 9ztrs u no remedy .for Ae.a. ne sau*f sub
NIT to them. Tam prepartd0 DO q. It's kE!oaf
That fAx M.nsn1nl CoxfAoxsaE cAKkor IL RfeRALxp:
So fur II that question b concerned We might a well
rsree 70 tie admission 1t tha Territory nov u ne1t
year five ten yeass heoce. ."-Cong. Gote, 6ts:
ston 1928, Pags lib.
No. 2,
On tic 4th day Of January, 1854, Mr.
Dougias, rs Chairman Of the Committee on
I Territories, reported to the Scnntc bis second
bill for the .uganixatisn Of Nebraska. The
bill was accompanied by .. report, from which
the following rs An extract:
"four Couuluse do not ksa s1icn.elves called rpou
to enter into lhe discussion II ese controverted qne
anos THY fnslyr tbs sane grave assas which pro-
tpesd The the sses1oei ss aad tn teatfE1
, 1860-10-05
III GOES DIRECTLY FOR sCrR1NE COURT sQykR-
E1GxTT AID / TERRITORIAL sLAyE CODE.

On the Esd Of June, 1850, the Douglas ~ing
Of the National Democratic Convention, al
Baltimore, flushed up its business BY adopting
the following resolution rs part Of its plat
form the resolution haring been offered by
It's adoption would give III. Douglas 10000
votes in that State: s..
stRa1psd, Tha. tt u Ia aeconaaoes with ths Gin
, 1860-10-05

which goTe!susuts InAy exesoiss over It, hAys heen
dwelt upon In the argument. :.
But IN considering thu question before us II u1ust
be borne Ii mind that there no law Of nations stand
lug between The peopls NJ the un3ted sta.cs and ther
Rnversas Ind Interfering With their relation TO each
Of The cii1ena under H. positive And practical rrgu
Aoos plainly written down. The people Of the unlled
se&5 haTe delegated 10 It certain enumerated poFers
snd forbidden to exercise oihers. It haA no power
oser fa psson Of property If citizen but What the
c'aEens 'os The United Sit AAre granted. And no
AWE OF usagts pheFna. reasoning Of states.
men OF 1ar1se u on the re1a t,mAster and aaye
tat c3izen the lgFts they have reserved And the
constitution reeo9ntzes the right ns property of the
master II s!art, and makes distinction between
that description Of property anil other property owned
y caken 10 fsfbrnui, acting under tie authority
the United States 'rhetaer it he l<gl>1ilrt, ers-
entf.e Or }ad!cf1. has ri0As to drdto such dis
4actton. Or tifnx to if III tentft n tie zfprisions
prottc4on ef pr1Eats proptrty ugala& As <scTooAa-
nenk u As government.
Non, as we have atrealy said In earlier part Of
this opinion. upon different pout, THE RIGHT M
PROPERTY IN 4LAyE Is DISTINCTLY AND
EXPRESSLY AFFIRMED IN Tue CONSTITUTION.
The night Of traf3c In It, 1lke an ordinary artclapf
merchandise and property. was guaranteed to Tic
citizen. Of the United sta,es in e,ery state list m,sht
deatre II, for twenty years. And the Goyettment ID
e1resa terma pledged to prutcct 1t In ali future time
Il the kave escapes from Ills owner. This IL done IN
r1ain words, too pla1n 10 be misunderstood. And no
word can he found In the Constitution which gisas
Congress = greater power over elave properly. Or
which entities property Of that kind len PROTECTION
than property Of any other description. The only
rEQaA,n
, 1860-10-05

Hx DEFENDS TIE BORDER Rr7r1ASs OF MISSOURI.
IL his report Of March 18th, 1855, already
referred to, Mr. Douglas defended the Border
Ruf1ian invaders Of Kansas, a. follows:
1.-THE natural consequence Was that Immediate steps
were taken hy tue people Of the we4ern counties Of
Missouri To stimulate, osRanIse and carry into effect
system Ok emigration, dmiAr to that Of e Masachu-
sets EmgTant Aid Company, for the avnwed purpose
Of conneracnk the effects and protecting themselves
and their domestic Institutions sru The consequences Of
that companys operations. The material difference In
the CHARACTER of the two rival and conflicting
consists Ia the tact that the had it, origin in an
AGGRESSIVE and TIE other In a DEFENSTFT
policy"
, 1860-10-05

m BATS TIE ALMIGHTY has REQC1BKo TIE IL
8rKSCI OF aLAvxRy!

In thu Memphis speech, following imnedl"
ately after the extract quoted above, from
the Asaianehe, comes the following blasphe-
nous declaration
, 1860-10-05

On the ed Of October. l649. Mr.. Douglas
made speech at Springfield, Illinois. Which
was cut.si>leA iu the Staie Register Of Nov.
sth, IN xljit', lie used the following remark
nble ianrua6e:
Thr Missouri Conprnulse has an OH sn nkiu 10 that
f tue Cnt,>ttrn af tue Emitted ftatrs conceived In
thu riris Il srernal ncIon, Atd calculated to
rrmoye f,srysr t,e dsneer which Eeetned to threaten
nj me d stan, .ay The social houd ol union
All tie evide.sr: Il. pubic spinIon, a Tint day, seemed
4oiadIeatr tnt t.ls C"mnroausxe Ind cae canonized
in thu hearts It tie American pttp1e ss 4 ascrrd thing,
which M ruthless Lz1 would ever be reckless enough
to dist1Eb.H
, 1860-10-05
III sATs TEE PEOPLE or KASsAs MIST pa
1SCppCEp,n

In the same report, and on page 10 thereof,
he advocates the subsection Of the people Of
Kansas, in the following words:
''In this connection, your Committee feel sscsre at
istactIon In commencing the nesssges and rroeiarna-
oos Of The President, In which have the gratifying
assurance that the supremacy Of the laws vii be sin-
The federal snd local Laws viii he sIoa.ed agaInst al
attempts OF organized reslssence."
And again, in his speech Of March 12th,
1856:
The minority report advocates foreg interference;
we advocate belfEoyesnnent and non interference
Nc ere ready 10 meet the ISSUE and there xu be NJ
dodginR. Ne intend to meet It boldly; TO REQUIRE
SUBMISSION TO TIfE. LAWS AND TO THE con-
ST1TETED AUTHORITIES; TO REDUCE TO SUR
LECTION THOSE WHO KEsteT THEN, AND TO
PUNISH REBELLION AND TREASON. I I'M glad
that defiant spirit u exhibited here: accept tho
tssae."-congress Gtobs part !, 1856, Pogs
, 1860-10-05
He DON'T CARE WHITTIER SLAVERY Is VOTED
: DOWN OR Voted CE

He DON + CARE WHETHER SLAVERY Is VOTED
DOWN OR VOTED Cr.
It was with this epiSr:mmatic Phrase that
Lecompton Constitution on the 9Th Of Deccm-
ber, 1857, when he spoke as follows:
*sBut an told on all siie.; oh. Jus. walt; the
pfusavery ciause will be voted iown' Thst tors net
ob7iate Any Of my injections; it does not diminish
any Of thttu- You hare right to force FREE
stAte Constitution on kansas than Slave State Con-
ssuon. II kansaa wants Slave State Constitution,
she llas right TO IT. II she wants Free State Con-
situteu, se has right to It. Il is Of my bast-
re-. .'eh rsy To- .lays'y w e!aa;s 1 lss,el ICARE
uP."-Comg. Gio1e, 1851 IS, pd,t l, pag4 IS.
HE CRGfs THAT sLAFERr SHOULD LAST FoHxvKx.
In hia joint debate with Mr. Lincoln, Ut
Quincy, Illinois, Nr. Douglas frankly confessed
that his 'great principle" contemplated that
slavery should last forterr. He said:
''1n this stste have declssed thu: negro shall
not be citizen, aaa xs haze also declared tha. he
shall not l'e SLAVE We had right to adopt that
As otaer Pe1icy. now speaking Of rights under
The Constitution, and not Of moral religious rights
DO not discuss the morals OF the people E Missouri
but let them settle that matter for themselves hd
we'll ourselves that they lesr conscfences as
we'll A. xe, anil that they Ere accountable to Col and
their poserty. anu not to L. II Is for them tn decide.
therefore, the moral and religious right 1t the slavery
question for themselves within their lmIts as-
set that they sl much right under the Constitution
70 alors the s5sem Of policy hlct they have, re
had adopt ours. 30 II Is with every other State In
this Union. Lst each state stand firmly BY that great
Constitutional right, let eaeh State mind tts owu BUD
and let it, nefghboFs aope rad there will be no
trouble On this question. II xe will stand by that
principle then Mr. Lincoln win and that I'll. Republic
CAN EXIST FOREVER DIVIDED INTO FREE AND
SLAVE gTATES our fathers made ii and the people
Of each state havc deciiel."-5Ltnco1a and Douglas
Debates Of 1soS-pase 2D9.l
, 1860-10-05

It will be admitted that Hr. Douglas IL \
good Judge Of what his dogma of :" Popular
Sovereignty" has accomplished during the
past si1 years. Therefore, we let him tell the
result in his own words, quoting from bis
speech II tho Senate on the 18th Of MAJ,
, 1860-10-05

whs know him, know hin, 70 b i dzx7IznAx AID II
EoxaaT xAs-true and loyal tho Constitution Of his
snuntFy. tFy."-ARpsnai7 II hs Csn9TtsstenEI Gte6s,
1856, pdas 10.
, 1860-10-05

The meaning Of popular Sovereignty"
is now shown by Mr. Douglas himself Ia be
this: That the people Of a Territory shall not
have the power Of electing their o.n executive
officers or judges, nor the right to make their
own laws. except By q two.thrds vote if the
Federal Governor shall disapproye them; and
Nat Mey shall not hare Tie r;ghtfo exelude Aarery
at all. 1t is further shown that under Popu-
1ur Sovereignty "no such thing as sovereign
power attaches to Territory" and that the
settlers upon all unorsanizcd territory Of the
United States are to be treated as vagrants
and rebels. In other words, that Popular
Sovereign means the right Of the people of
the Territories to be governed entirely By the
President and the Supreme Court Let the
reader give Ills attention to the following facts,
taken from the record, aud judge whether
this is not correct statement Of "Popular
Sovereignty:
POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY IN THE NEBRASKA
ELL.
The twelfth section Of the Kansas Nebraska
Act says:
"That the Governor. Secretary, Chief Justice,
Associate Justices, Attorney and Marshal, thall be
Nafe.." ~ >'~ wv ~''''
The sixth section Of the same act sars:
Every bill which shall hare passed the Council and
House nf Representatives Of said Territory shall, be-
fore It become law, be presented - the Governor of
he shall return 1t with ills objections t0 the House Ia
Which It originated, Elo shall enter the nyectfs, ut
large. their Journal aud proceed to reconsider IT,
H. after such Reconsideration 1wo1utnDs or that
HOUSE shall agree pass the til It shatl he sent
Ether with the objections tn the other HOUSE. by which
1t shall 'kewi:e be reconsldesed snd II apprrsd by
, 1860-10-05

he DECLARES THE DoGrs LEG1sLA1rRr or KAS-
sAs 70 HAVE 1EIy VALID.
In the same report, and on page Is thereof
Nr. Douglas asserted the yalidity Of the bogus
legislature and its acts, as follows:
t'so far ~ the question involves THE LEGALITY
OF THE KASeAs LEGISLATURE AND THE VALID
1TF OF ITS ACTs, It Is euttdy n.nateria whether
AdDpt the reasonn4 and conclusion Of the minority
majority repoEa, for each prnrrs that the LEG1SLA
TCRE WAS LEGALLY AND DULY CONSTITUTED.
, 1860-10-05
m THINKS stAyIRT IS MERE QUESTION or
DOLLARS AID CLNY3.

uuLLAtS ALL GAA4S+
Shortly after the Illinois election Of 1858,
NJ. Douglas made southern tour, stopping at
St. Louis, Memphis, and New Orleans, and
addressing the people at those places on polit-
ical topics. He spoke at Memphis, on the
2osh Of November, and the following is an
extract from, his speech as reported phono-
graphically in the Memphis Apalancs<:
"wheoerer Territory has = ellmate, soil md pro-
duetjons making It the fnttres II the Inhabitants to
Ind Eve eacou;axeuent- Whenever the climate, so
and productions preclude the possibility Of slavery b
Ink profitable, the5 x not permit IT, You
moi csre 4he4e the immigration 10 The southern country
comes from III old Joshaa r. Glddlngs aaouid raise
colony in Chic and seste down In Louiaana he would
be ne strongest sdyoeate Of Slavery In The whoc South
he you'd hn xheu he got thsxe his opinion slase.
would bs very much modified; he would ind oa those
sugar Plantations that it xas cot question hetxeen
The white sa and the negro but between tie negro unR
ktA crocodile He wouil aay that between tho cegra
sa the crocodile be soek The side os The negro: but
between the and tho white man he would 20 for
the white NAN"
Again, in his speech Of February 29th,
1860, ia the Senate, In the course Of his u.s.
sault on Senator Seward, he said:
1--WE In Illinois t.5ed Slavery While We we're Ter
rsofy, aod foun1n EaA not profitable: and hence se
'sionol G1o1t. 1sa3-so; pods ais 1''''
And again in the same discussion:
But they, {the people Of nnnots) sai se1ue..eues
proves that Is not gung 10 be profitable In thIs cll-
NATE Thy Add no .crYples d5out IT, Every one
Of Them vas nuned by Il. Ills father aed b. mother
bed slaEes: 7A<y had no scrupls about IT, Ats"g
sTQh< but they sAd. re cannot make any money by H.
md cur Esate a~ay of nnrh, up to hose etes
nal snoWs, perhaps sha gain population faster
Vc stop Slavery and nrtte In The Northern popua&on'
essssed ss1s.s si eS1s5; ss e5.
1sa9-6o; pdgs9l9.
, 1860-10-05

Of the Territory Of the United satesf Do you net e:
eluds gambling sahes, which properly recognised
has my eontended that the exclusion Of gambling
tAel and the exclusion o. ardent apl1its wss *toaon
Of any ctns itutional privilege or right? hnd ~
Etates there Il no outcE5 Aga!nst that, because
Is the prohibition of specific khd Of property ana not
prohibition aea.nst my sreilon Of TO Cu,"n. WY.
Into some Of ihe territories Of the limited ftasss and
t,klnx bar with him, and u,ng and selling spirits
thesr The la~ also prohibits certain other ds.1p.lans
ia lot therefore .epared say that, under the Con.
.,itu,,o trr hrt no! tie osrrr to pax sts tucud-
f"y Ntgrp Aartrv. om fat Territories. IT INVOLVES
I'll. SANS rslsclrLEs S-siteea q SeaHsor Doapsa1'
Glol<, lsl9-S.
, 1860-10-05
He sATs sLAyERT Is IN ACCORDANCE WITH TUE
RULES or CIVILIZATION Axp CHRISTIANITY.

He sAT9 sLAyERT Is IN ACCORDANCE WITH TUE
RULES or CIVILIZATION Axp CHRISTIANITY.
In tie came speech Mr. Douglas gare utter
ance to the following atrocious sentiments
on slavery in the abstract:
"At that day the negro wns looked urnn As hetng
Of inferior AL history hri prore that IN
part of tl world. or the wors history a the negro
not the intention VI the founders Of this gosert-
vio1af. that xFrat l7w Of G which uAie the
d!stuctin between lhe Elte and the binck That
dt-tiartfon il kkfin H"1 lx'fthe. HnI it h1s ttea
Tie RUE .fcirifi=atiea an{ chrs.fiaaiy Ms 1ror3d
ottr, :tnt .ettnertr any min vt ofmtn srrre in
ct1HsMt ef kskiHJ cure " ktsm*ftets, fAey 3saHtd
eonstnf to Be 1ortrht.f BY those wa0 ars cdd1ls g
managing Meir 45uir4 for Meaa-"
In revising the Missouri RTpu11ienn,s report
Of this speech, for publication in the STATE
Register, Ns. Douglas or some di.crect friend
omitted tn $ obnoxious paragraph. But that
does not relieve him from the responsibility
Of it, because We find the s.mc idea, in nearly
the same language, in his Chicago speech Of
October Esd, 1851, as published in Sheaha.l's
Lif.. Of Douglas, to-wit:
"The civilized world hare avays he'll that when
by ignorance, superition cruelty and bararfsn a.
BE- utterly incapable of governing themselves they
must In the nature nf things, BE- governed BY othsrs
BY such Laws sre deemed applicable 10 their cond1-
tlon."-Isheahaa's LIE Of Douglas, page ISL
This is popular sovereignty with vcuge-
ancei
, 1860-10-05
NJ TH1SK3 SENATOR TRCNDILL Is 4 TRAITOR,
LID THAT ALL YRAtrQGs enQrIu NJ NrXQ.

M 1H1SK5 SENATOR IRCNDCLL IS TRAITOR,
Aap THAT ALL 1RAtrons snouLn ne HC1o.
The following extract from Mr. Douglas
speech on Kansas affairs, In the Senate, March
goth. 1856, IL submitted without comment.
The language is sufficiently direct for the COM
p1che1,sion Of all fair.minded men:
4 word or two more On another point and will
close My colleague has made N assault the rres
dent OF tie United States r his enurts y:nrate the
supremacy Of the laws and put down fnsuTzeetion 4nd
ihs President Of the tn'ic Staies u entitled TO The
thaoks OF the whole country for the pFouptless md
energy with which he haa met the cttss hxaa ha tua-
pefai'e duty 10 r1Antaia the supremacy Of the sEs
duty 10 suppre1s rebellion md put down siy
colleague says that wI b. peteasary catch the trail
TOT before the President can hang him. Ny epnlon Is
that fto the signs Of the uale and La view Of al that
be very little difficulty ln efrestinE The ttzitors-aui
that. t,o, WITHOUT GOING ALL TIE WAY Tu
KANSAS TO FIND TltENi fLaukhser.l This sov-
ernaeut has shoxn sef the most powerful of any On
equal to foreign war to domestic dexncc eeu.l 10
any emergency that may ase IN The exercise Ut irs high
functions in a! things EXCEPT THE POWER 70
HANG A TRAITOR!
trust In Gud that the time Is not near at hand and
That 1t may never come wheu 1t will be the Imperative
duty Of those charged With the faithful execution Of The
laws. to exeres. that power. trust that calper and
Wiser couns~!s viii prevail; that p%ss!on may subslde,
snd reason and loyalty feturu, beure the shall
be cnmmttte'a. fersenty hope that The oec4on may
ne~er ssse which shall sx1er n-ressa1y 10 test the
power OF The Government and the dsuness Of the
utsTs In til. respect hut IT, unfortunately, that eanu-
ErHty shall happen Il treason axanst the United States
sal be cosun,mated f4r be It from my purpose to ex-
press the xss that The penasy Of tie la1 may not fall
upon the traitors head i"-Afpeadis to Me Cbngrts-
slonM Gtods, ls55-56, fxtgs xs5.
, 1860-10-05


In the same speech, Mr. Douglas ventilated
his views Of the Declaration Of independence,
as follows:
"The s'gneEy Of the Declaration of 1niependentt,
referre 10 white man, and him a1onc when they de-
cfa1ed that all nfu created equal. They In
struggle With Great Britain The principle they
asserting WAS THAT BRITISH sCtiKcT AMERICAN
8oEt, wA* FOCAL 10 BRITISH aEsJxcT xa0LAN
that Rr1sss suhject here, entitled to all the
rights, privileges, and lmmunties under the FritIs
Constitution. that Br-h subject in England enjoyed;
that theiF fhts we're naenah1e, and hence that Par
lament rhose power Was omnipotent had power to
ALLEVIATE then."
1tappears thus, that in Ar. Douglas opinion
not only the African race, but the German,
Italian, French, Scandinasiau. and, indeed,
every mutton except the English, Irish, Scotch
and American, are excluded from al part or
lot in the Declaration Of Independence. The
phrase "ali men," does not refer to them.
They hare no business with the Fourth Of
July. 1t is to be observed that in this matter
Mr. Douglas has outrun the Drcd Scott decis~
ion itself, which. after quoting the language
of the Declaration Of Independence, SAYS:
''The general wosts ahove quoted weuM seem to
embrace the whole human family, and II they wesc u.l
In sfni!aY instrument, at Mis- tay, wpt bc under
stoo. But it Is too clear for dispute that the enslave
African not Intended to bx inciuaed, anl
formed m part Of the people who 1amed aud adopted
this declasaaon."
, 1860-10-05
HE KxDoEsEs THE LEccNproS CONSTITUTION IN



On the 18th Of June, 1857, Mr. Douglas
made his Grand Jury" speech, so-callcd, nt
Springfield, to which one reference has already
been made The following extracts from this
speech are taken from the photographic report
published in the Missouri Rr".bliran Of June
18th, 1887. The famous Lecompton Conren-
ton had just been called By tl': bogus Legis-
lature, and on this topic he spoke as follows: !:
kansas Is about 10 speak for herself through her
delegates assembled In convention to forn eonstft1-
s,on, preparatory to her admission into the Cnon
equal fo'tng a!ih the original States. Peace md pros
pehty prevail thrnuSaout her BORDERS. The ls~
under Which her delegates are to be elected Is believed
to be Just and fair In al In objects and provsons II
any portion Of the nhattunts Aetn under the advice
Of political eaders In distant States, sal choose to
absent themselves Fo the pills. and withhold their
sotes with view of leaving the Free State Democrats
Ia minority. and thus securing proslavery constltu-
ton Ia opposition to maturity Of the people living
under it, let the responsibility those who. for
partisan purposes will sacrifice the principles they pro-
fess to cherish and promo1e.''
The national Republican., 1860-12-08
Arrivals at the Hotels,

Bro.cns'.- j. Jordan, W. II. McCurd, Tenn.
Fl. G. Boyd, Col. j. s. Langhorne, Va. W. P.
Seymour, Pa. g. R. Latham, Va. W. Deer
ing, Me-; J. Christian, G. S. Darlington, Va.
9. Stone, Ala. J. Daniel, CAL; W. H. Mclean,
Md. W. 7. Jennings, J. Z. Terrell, T. Sweeny,
Va. s. NJ. Chappell, B. L. Wilmer, Nd; l.. s.
Trimble, KY; b. Harold, Va; J. Owens and
son, Md; J. A. Graves, N. c.; ]. Wallace, DR..
8. Kimberl y, jr, 9. A. Ronald, DR.. L, G. Moor,
j. Edmondston, Va.
Avenue House.-C. R. Belts, U. 8. NJ; R.
Brown, Nd; P. Grant, P. G. Bradstreet, Me. {;
4. F. Allen, Mass, 3. Norris, Cal. G. c. Booker,
n. T.; ID. Dunn, Ind; II. Hammell, Va; G.
s. Vickeong, G. Z. Smith, Md.
iards'.-Lieut. Hughes, U. s. N; J.W.
Miller, Wis.,; II. s. Sanford, Conn.,; d. Viii.
liams, Pa; A. Van Swaginga, Pa; G. A.
NJ. Anderson, N. =; F. ". P Pierce, SGns. G"ss. !;
3. G. Front, N. j.; Col. De Russy, u. s. A. /;
W. L. Wickham, Mo. A. Scholl, Ill.,; Gen.
J. s. Jones and lady, Pa. f. B. Lord and lady,
Ohio; r. r. Thompson and lady, Oregon p.
F. Story, N. Y; Q. s. Grooh, N. Y. Mrs. P.
L. Updike, III. II. E. Updike, Ill. G. A.
Leavens and lady, ILL.,; B. b. Hawkins, Ky. {;
E. D. Lohser, Mass; s. s. Raisbeck and lady,
N. Y; N. B. Holmes, N. Y; c. NJ. Odeil,
y; W. Odell, N. Y; A. Williams, London |;
j. Morse, Me-. G. W. Bishop, Mass. 8. Chap.
lin, Ohio; G. Westeott and lady, Ky; Miss
Westcott KY; A. White and lady, N. Y; G..
8. W. Hall, Md; G. M. Lanman, Pa. A.
Herchell, London; ]. Giles, Mass Mr.. and
Mrs. McCrea, Pa; J. J. Miller, Pa. Col. and
Mrs. Larnard, U. s. A.; B. H. Cheever, RI.
National Hotel.-B. J. Darnville, Va. J.P.
Martel, NO.; W. M. Thacksrd, Penn. r. R.
Meade, jr, N. Y; Mrs. Bishop, Miss Gear,
Penn, Jos. L. Hammer, Fl. G. Hayes, N. Y. ;
J. E. Berrell, Va. W. Kinks, jr, Mass. DR..
W. E. Woodward, Nd; G. Schmit, Penn. G.
Il. Sadtler, Nd. Mrs. M. E. Morgan, Penn.
J. A. Canadian, Nd; W. B. Carpenter, N. Y. ;
A. B. Caldwell, Va. L. Webster, r. l.. s. w.
Weeks and lady, N. Y; r. c. Fonte, Tenn.
s. G. johnson, Ohio; J. H. Baylor, Ct. Maj
Colquhar, Va.
Clarendon Hotel.-E. r. Graft, Nd; Hons.
L. 7. Moore, Ky; Schuyler Colfax, Ill. Gil.
man Marston, N. H.; T. A. R. Nelson, Tenn.
]. M. Harris, Nd; z. B. Vance, N. c.
Washington House.-Peter Jamerson, O.;
G. NJ Bowser, Ind, Mrs. J. Gridley, Mass.
Clay's Hotel-J. H. Prentis, Pa. A. H.
Bean, N. Y; l.. B. Martin, O.; P. M. Walter
ford and lady, Mo-. W. NJ. Varnum, Ga; W.
Mutchman, Ga; s. Kent, Vt. Master Kent,
VT. E. c. Murray, Ind; L. W. Jenniss, Mass.
DR.. 8. Parker, Mass.
Krk,oood House-W. II. Finney, B. F.
Finklin, Va. J. King, Ark; G. Bradley, Hon
J. L. Stallworth, M. V. Watson, Ala. A. J.
Hamilton, wife, daughter, and servant, Texas
II. Adams, II. Forest, Nd; W. E. Chiffon, Va