The new era., 1860-08-02
Editor Newson, Senator HoI.
ley, and the New Era.

q
crawling close to the ground who car
comprehend ne objects but themselye,
and the dirt which they eat. Anythin.
hIgher-anything better-a wider range
"a clearer and higher life than theil
own-they are utterly unable to com
prehend. Liberality they denounce a.
f heresy; justice they anathamatize a.
, tyranny; and only calumny, deception
I and prescription will suit them. Thcs,
10 them are virtues, which they roll a.
r sweet morsels under their tongue
These are cardinal, and strike a svm
pathetic chord in their souls, which
makes them dance for very Joy. AfTin-
tiles attract each other; and so these
ground moles in the party are iubianl
only in that atmosphere of bigotry and
tanatlcism from which all good men turn
| with loathing and contempt.
The editor of the Times has come un-
der the ban of one Of these, for having
written his article on "Southern Visit
ors. He is threatened with expulsion
from the party, because he did not de-
nounce everybody as biackleg who is
not an abolitionist. Here is the way
News On talks Ia brother Republican for
undertaking to read him out Of the par
ty =
A man who secured seat in the Sen
ate OF Minnesota on party grounds al ne
and not because he had received the
highest number of votes, who had not
manllness enough to resign his SC cat;-
who avalled himself of his position to
play the traitor--who did play the trai-
tor--who gave the lie as mark of his
breeding, and got an inkstand near his
heao Tor his meanness, is very proper
person to read US out Of the party ii
God grant if HolIcy is in, we may be
out, ESQ on that score there can be mol
difference Of opinion
But, friend Newson, we don't see how
this helps the matter. According to
your view of things, Senator Holley has
just as much right to read you out as
any Republican has to attempt to read
US out Holley will say she is justified
IN doing so by your course. What then?
why this. You, whom a Republican
Senator honored by Republican Leg
Isiature with the public printing, has
already read out ofthe great Republ;-
can party, ought to be little modest
n expressing an opinion of the ortho ,
loxy of other Republican papers = =
either Hawley is pure calumniator, or !
'ou are pure hypocrite. Now which i
re we to believe? You or Holley. He, =
he State printer, says, you are un-
ound;-you, the editor of the Times, s
ay we are. Now we in turn may say f.
ne same thing of both you, for ac- D
ording to Hawley you are deceiving; f
nd according to the 1Tmes HoI lev is a +,
'aitor.
Now we don't know exactly whether :;
le Senator ought tc 'read you out' or &
OF, but one thing is certain, ifever man :,
rev bomhshell directly against the =
brit, the animus of our party in this :,
tate, you did it when you wrote the ar ;,
Gle of which he COMPLAINS and for
hch he reads you out. We doubt il 81
enator Hollcy will ever let you come W
ack if he can help it :,
Yet with all this, we must say. ac- n,
'rdlng TO our views, your article on .,
Southern visitors was nothing but fair
I'd honest. You said what was true .
Id you had the right to say it,. But :,
NV long was it before you were called n
an account for it , You found one "
oaker just below you. So we have .
EN- up here. They are, to be sure =,
'all ones. Nevertheless, they crook. III
ou appear to care very little for the 6,
oaking of Senator HawIey who is one :;
the Colonels Of our political Repe-l -
ent. Much less care we for the ~ r.
loieiul sounds" of these here and Won :. ~
no are not Colonels. 50 ,ora r. .,.s
esEvery Democratic United States