New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-03-05

wslis per mile, specifyios ibe width
Water pipe per N feet, specifying the sizes and kinds
Sewsrr per linesi yard specyns tho sizes and kiadA
Ieeh excavation, per cubic ynd.
farth excavation, per cubic yard.
P:ans rss and .SaS p.ns as! per acre
sdsss specify their number character 'ize and material
Transverse roads, length
And that the sad Commissioners be further requested to give In
Se. the 1asp a, Of The several classes Ct work reatoS 10
plan adopted By them together with such other data drawn
determine whether the Of s2scooOo ,hsresbout at
present aled or BY the ss CommiiSners will prove ado
quaie to the final completion Of tie work.
mir. Jacques in favor Of the reconsideration, and
opposed TO the resolution. The information already
transmitted TO the Assembly was full and complete
az could, under the circumstances be furnished, and
ought TO be considered as satisfactory. New-York
City desired this parf-desired its completion upon the
scale which has been determined upon by the Commits
sioners. The Common Council of New-York had
asked for the passage Of this bill and the people Of
NewYork were to foot the bill. Then why not grant
them the authority desre6. Mr.. Jsques read letter
from James w. Beebman in favor of the passage Of
the bill, and spoke at length in commentator of the
Park, the Commissioners, and the able manner in
which they have conducted the enterprise far lie
ALEC read memorial in favor Of the bin signed by John
A. Stevens, Duncan, Sherman & Co., Charles OConer,
and several other gentlemen Of similar stamp.
Mr. Arcuarius spoke in favor of the bill The Press,
he said favored the Park the people, the 80 600 tax
payers of New-York favor is-everyb body wants it
andta payers ready to furnish the means. Then
why tn opposition Nothing in justice, could be
said sgspst the character of the Commissioners or the
manner in which they have discharged their high
trust.
Mr. Holcomb moved the previous question which
was no, sustained. After further debate between
MessTe. Jacques and Conklpg insegaId to the chsrac
ter Of the Park Commissioners, during which Mr..
ConklDg read attack upon the honesty of the
Commissioners, from The Netc- York Leader, but
which he said he was not willing to indorse. While
he dissented from the article, and was not willing to
change want Of interest against the Commissioners
yet he had in bis possession written charges OF very
serious character against come Of them He could see
objection on The score Of delay in the bill which
had been urged agaipst his resolutions since the
amended report was already made up and was then
within the walls of the Capitol. 1t would no doubt be
forthcoming Immediately if called for by the adoption
of his resolution.
Ar. Jacques could zee but little difference between
originating or repeating sander against the far fame
of honorable ana high minded gentlemen. Mr. Conk-
ling he said, had read vile attack from The Leader
against the integrity Of the Commits oners, clearly in
tended TO influence the votes of members upon the
question under consideration. How much less cupabe
such might be than orig mating such charges and
putting them forth in n manly manner, he would leave
the Houe and the public to judge for themselves Mr..
Coles moved the previous question which was ordered
ard the motion to take the bill from the table was car
ried by SO to 26 The resolution was then lost by "a
to 80 after whah the bill was read third time, and
passed by 68 TO IL.
This bill was sent to the Senate to-day, and referred
to the Committee on Cities and Villages, wheIsuPon
Mr.. Mcleod Murphy offered series Of resolutions
calling the Central Park Commissioners to report to
the Senate:
Their for having and undertake. the plan
for the Park the execution Of which exceeds the Limitation Of
the Legislature by the Of 1881
Why they persisted IN their plan aer the legislation Of 1889
The CT the Commissioners voting In favor Of the
adoption OF that plan.
The names the Commissioners voting upon the question
CT doing the worn by contract or by days work.
The item, Of the plan which the BOard have resolved to
strike out OF omit
How much money has been expended below Seventy
street how much below Ninety street. how much below
street. and the number Of Ia each
section beonsng to The Park.
money required 10 BE expended In each
on stating the items Of expenditure and the cost OF each aud
which the Items any, essential and which OF them
rot essential.
How much money had been expended to sth May 1858,
the plan adopted how much lt January 1882 and
how much TO LIST January, 1850.
O. What has been paid for drain tile and how much
been laid down In each Of the three sections Of the
faid Park before meItionedf
the ofthe persons who make the purchase,
Parkf the employed connected with
city of ana co. what nrr and what
the amount annually.
These resolutions were adopted, aud will, no doubt,
be promptly and fully answered.