New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-04-25

LIFE IN hEw-YoRK.
In re. Petition Of Fanny Atkinson.
In this ease the petiponr obtained writ OF babeas
corpus, directed John Miller commanding HIN 70 produce
body O, William Atkinson infant about Ave OF
The petitioner toe 18th Of January last she dev-
cred the boy to Miller In Of written instrument
which she red without having any knowledge Of the con-
tents She alleged she induced to sign the in'ruen In
Of the threats made her by Miller which put her
IN fear Of her M She now claimed that the paper Ia question
was no force that the child be restored her, John
b. Miller produced the boy Court and made Torn 10 the
witt In which be alleged thai the paper signed by the petit
husband by virtue Of which the child de-
hyered him. and under his control He denied that be
threatened the petitioner used duress compaon
toward her to induce her " sign the paper Miller alleged that
he verify believed that the the boy
sbundshy able support It. Miller alleged that the said Fanny
improper person, aud wholly unable and Incompetence
take charge Of the boy.
TIE alluded 70 ". annexed 70 the wit dated Fsb
John b. Miller set forth that Fanny At nson Srior her
1855 Al when time she vas unmarried rive birth % Boy IN
questions that John B. Miller being DESTROYS Of 2as the
..On Of $50 psd 70 her and s xsEn,cD the sta vas Dc.
yered Miller to be under BIZ. sole conro' ead
!. By ~ < ,as ms,
nS d ".sS q By Legal marriage Tss %
syersed BY the petitioner end SET up thai the nsrunent
ste denied she executed the instrument Of her fee
will abe denied that she impr 1per peron and In
Mrs denied that Miller the father of the
cd in question The testimony In the will be taken
VIM H. Do Camp for petitioner, z. Skater for respond
SPECIAL TEax-APnrL "a Before Justice BosSzY.
HABEAs CORPUS FOR CUSTODY OF THREE CHLDREH.
Hugh Caufor5 Resor Mary j. era Word Respondent.
been proceeding before Justice Bsnney sever. days The
the custody Of three infant children tho fruit Of his
IN a IN 5 to
lived until 1885 when tbs reatoI Wished to move Iarher West
fassdto there He however, went and afr renaning
while at Toledo length located at LOs;p,p2 Indiana where
he RENTED part Of his esreng 70 hts wife and 0oce or twice
bis friends at cleveland the husband was Informed bis
wife bad found attraction In tbs Of one Richard story
nebrss doctor Of that place. In whose house she vsd be
re husbsDd finally came on to Cleveland r his family bu.
finding the cey his wife true he abandoned
her his three children TO InsisDs and siossq9ony
Absut ss or eight months ssr be took them from hi. Wife
then she followed after husband mt got Losses
port be would saye nothing 20 DO Win hs soa reS . s
wus thus in LosanspoIt her husband Commenced divorce suit
and the custody children was hnay decreed
After tho CONNIE the swift hrd
hsbess corpus sxsin. the Bishop; tried she
WIEN the aid Of 'ymPathze 70 get the children over
The Tstor bss now come on aud claims that by Of the
divorce Indiana record OF which be presents be
Bumber Of technical objections raised t, the samis
y of the record as evidence they Aad
The record ss%ttsd and upon rssstIs this and srosscDs
decree had jurisdiction Of the relaer rested
The counfe for the respondent offered hoT thai TIE eafo
had abandoned her various times and had III treated add
abue5he But tLs resinr objected to the In
lion of any relating the state affairs between
them I'D 10 Of the decree and claimed that the divorce
decree excluded all such testimony.
under the recent amendment to the Code, passed lev
days ago allowing anybody testify In kad o.
poceng the Judge allowed the respondent to be called
the stsnd.
Jbe is still
John Patterson ESQ., for relAtor John Mehecn ESQ., ana
Wm. Smith for respondent.