The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-11-24

% last summer-sfser th, difncuty had occurred-be
nso psid money TO support Mrs. Burca's mother That
snese issues we're competent never supposed but n
.pey are sumnsea we are prepared and anxious
mem IN regard 70 the technical objections 10 these de-
positions, we leave that beet TO your Honor only re-
mndirg your Honor that when q witness, remembrance
Is exhausted II may be necessary to recapilula,e and
na are sometimes necessary to direct
Mr.. Van Amman said that his client had other in.
answer, as We coud-and a. II was exoec,e6
would-for We thought that these allegations
mans reputation someb ing to be taken care Of IL
such crisis OF his life We choose course dslbe-
rstey. We knew that the answer was to be parsded
contradict Il The bill simply charges adultery the
TO the bill INDUCES in replioaons In regard to
Mr.. Burchs parsmony and intimacy with other ladies'
Az lawyers admit that Is Irrelevant but want to
htgate them. II 10 the only way we have 70 reply 10
charges, let them ntgste them. We shall back out
and they concede that this part Of their rro
sssus, ana wsn ~ s.rne out, We aonI anow mat
viii prove ha' he was go.between for stuart and
MRS Buroh and therefore We wish 70 prove the letters
The conversations OF the occurred at the time
and are part Of the oeG the leading questions were
hen legal II the Court wishes authorities viii pro-
Mr. Beck with said that wa. necessary to give some
Of the outside history o. the case. We know and can
paid for i!s publication and dictated Of the
articles What ese could do but publish our repyi
MRS Burch had no money ou. had % sell eli o hey
drerses TO her neghbors, while she lived in
saVe the cours settle the matter the So's Court ready
to Sit end hear II ell, ready but do not want
eor susd az s snen navo - .neir
ready 10 60 ahead We sha 60 TO prove how Mr..
Corning advanced M Burch thousands Of dollars sup
port his bank, and $40 coo 10 sustain his bank.
That he wrote letters, each Of which said Mary
wel-can't you let me have little more money!
could go to the going down OF the sun 10 relate the
crueties the parsimones and the Of this
let The G urt admit both sides Il 10 unfair 10 say that
we back out the matter We are ready and anxious TO
Mr. Van Amman raid tha, he would afford the counsel
every scy and would sign an agreement not TO object
Judge Norton said that there appeared 30 much
agreement about the he might try main lssue
now and hold side courts for the other issues Laugh
The Court called attention to the motion for commits.
sion to take the dispositions Of Mr.. and Mrs Senator
Mr. Miller made q spcech Tor Bupoombe, saying that
the accusation was false that NJ Burch had caused
publication this matter he had endeayoTed 70 conceal
L. bill was never published by him. and ali the While
the Eastern paper. were Accusing Mr. Burch
The he ;a .oa S be with
Mr. Miller said that, 70 return TO business, he would
move to strike out the deposition Of Mrs. Caroline Van
French and translated 70 toe Commissioner the French
answers not being given; that she charge Of NJ
constantly prompting her reviewing her evidence With
her, and BY every means influencing her testimony The
counsel lnen READ Inc oil answer OF
in regard 70 Mr. Burchs intimacy with Mss spauldng
0. Little Falls.
In reply question nom the Court the defence said
they die not Charge Mr.. Burcn, In the answer, with
adultery.
Mr. Miller s,d-Then we object to this Cincinnati
evidence % Incompetent II the evidence does not
90 prove adultery, IL goes to prove nothing rns acts
OF intimacy which charges are not alleged in their
ard, according 10 well knoNn rule, lhsy shoad BE- A.
tgsd The counAe quoted uhorties sustain his point
MI 5ecswiih s.a that this question was AZ important
slider the whole evidence in the case. Tne oompIsnsnt
claims TO chow certain indis retons from which adultery
fe.sion Nov MS suca. con-
value II We can chow that Mr. Burch poisoned the
mind. Of bic servants sgalpst his wife, ne then intro
duced man OF Stuarts character, and him "A nt
mate he did this against the protests Mrs Burchs
brother, then We 90 far to prove . motive to prove
swpicious Then, If 20 farther, and chow thsi M
Burch was taking liberties with this young womsu nom
wife, then prove something iike motive for obtain
trg hts whes Confession folio wing that
slight from heaven OF which he speaks In his ieter
motive for his employing "cvery mental ana m,ra
nests OF perrnason 10 The form Of shaken in her
y Treer % Obtain TINS paper II We can :ho that
man before" and At the time tskiag liberties
Win other women, think We shall 90 FAR convince
the Court and OF the character OF this man ana the
innocence Of this defendant
Mr. Browning said ,ha, the role charge in this case
wss sdueiy. The depostons fat. prove the charge
directly but are filed with minute croun staoces going
TO prove ipdfcreons. and 81 prove the charge
IA
proper TO 20 TO the jury though use proves u,,h,ns
Nov, ar in what way 10 the oefendaot ths cir
denied the charge and old 20 into details and they
under fook 10 prove their maltltade OF ctcQn
snH ss aneI The defendants may intro
zach evidence s competent can be more 90 Now
the hsory Of the defence that Mr. Burch loved another
woman, and set 70 work, by all eorb OF
annoy and asgravatlo,s, In order 70 res
Iia Of ME- Bu,ch, BY . separation, tha, he
en't any evidence showng this web OF snnoyances
and oveIurriDg the presumption drawn from lh tssti
dence OF This kind pertnenu know nothing Of The evil
dence Of this case, and I know aud ought 70
another a.ura her psos h sqi .ns
bar dr heart, and bDr IL right her 70 sno thsS
s q I ~. v.Ssr srsssr
S 'iS are chs .sy than !. even charged
70 overturn ms presumption from circumstance Ex.
posing This hagant and disgusting indeceucy occ ring In
nr o, house In the atmosphere brcstned ey wife
dumb before bsr she replies ~
get hts oes aud we say that be hen
arranged circumstances for them see No T. remember
1., we have no eires, .,icenos ye. Of Me- Barca's
were not aware Of there crimnaity at q louis
When me snsvsr vas nrss drawn; We were s.r.,d TO
sed possponenent, which VIC are eager to avoiL Your
Horror hnos. THAI ws made no ae MP, get Ia depos.
ucrs upescbiss The ocmplaaAn, adaItsrev. rms
evidenes not rserimnsSry. bit tends raise pre-
srnp'iun that tbs charge Of Mrs. Burch's siaitry 10
see ,ss; W 70 day or two two s before ' sus
nsAl rup,r ,oeh place no breath Of suspsioa had
essn hrpsnsd Mrs Burchs cnaracser that her vr, .
~ss qcs STONED any vomans could be- sad ma,
shen trch suspicious ca arise they were set sn,s Nv
her huosId, Who should have been her protector but
who ruined her rrps,aton ana has nearly srosea her
heart Sems 70 that the jury vii decide that th,s
women 10 The victim OF foul conspracy aad NOT the
tout and criminal thing the oompiaDaot wishes 10 make
ner appcar so that soy evidence tending prove
this IL am hsibe
AZ Nan arrn.n ...x a., r.. -...ts ..-.- ..-..
ordinary divorce the de'endsnt bad promised ss
largely 40 ther oounse ,mise that they snoad charge
sepotsge and oonspracy thai tney should try MARE
the complainant the foui wretch which they try TO
make tbs Complainant 10 be The simple issue here 10
whether tho deendant ID guilty not Nov, wa. did
tne counsei attempt 10 proy.l SIMPLY that tbs oom-
rlapani sn equally guilty. Who IL tnls whose
svieenco 10 20 rcllahls3 Oily a wandering Ffeuch
man. vto tsnc - the deepo house aims aud
rspi1R through half opened Mr.. D iroh take
ludecsnt liberties With Mss Srauiding nnoct1 prove