, 1860-03-02

ajava Law. 1s'1'1'o
----
I. $. COURT FOB NORTHERN D1sTlcT OF ILL.
.-----.
| "'~ =
ru,on nsx1s poocppnx~es
The court 7oon vas we'll 6usd vasta,;,,v
morning at 81 o'clock, to hear the evidence m
behalf Of the Government nrocceded With
rhe warrant Of Tinted st,tes comm;e.;ons-
| cr-,.--.:
eo1neaa Al opllngae1o was put IN e''oenee. At
this point Ar. Goodwin, Of the defence, rose and
stated that the counsel for the defendant pro-
| nosad n rs;ea t.ra ra-to;, ,h;a,+;,,a -h;.l =;
- "A'~A :"
tnelr view, IL sustalneo oJ the Court, would ar
rest the trial tt 1ha point, and they we're there
fore desirous ia Er.s6ent t6tm In firm for the
.on.;do-a,:,. offIs -
eons'oeIat1on o. me oon'1'
The frat objection was that the warrant BY
which the negro Jim was held had no seal.
-'~ ~ se-'
oecono!5' II oofa On 'ne oaek an endorsement
| by u >. Marshal Uou9herty, deputizlng a."
y. Albright, whereas in the indictment the lat
for was snokpn of os 1s,acS a,h-;oh+
n,':-, s:A., ~
1nro. tne warrant olrects the Marshal OF the
Southern District OF Illinois to take, 6c. if be
shall be found in vour Dutrfc!n The er;dence
/ sro-. +h,t .ha oa:,n.. Ill .,.-.-.4, -,
,-', 'A1' ~. eAe Aseo 'ooA p1Aee ~ 'ne
Northern District, where by the restricting
terms of the writ ITSELF the nrocess conld mt
| rnn
~
LIZ. coo6 ofthe defence urged the well known
| principle Of law that the allegation and the
nroof 1o,., o,,-a.,ond
| s M. ~ -,
| LUIS 'nolctmen' SPEAKS oi albright as
"Deputy Marshal Of the Southern District OF
Illinois," whervas bv The Endorsement of The
| L. s. Marshal he was hit snec;,1lv da1r.;1ad ~
| execute this writ, lie urged other objections
| to The legal nnni;ficaton of Aihr;oht "'
T. y. Gttrict dtioyn1v E;tr5 resnonds =, ~,
| argument to slow 1hat no seal was needed for
| th1a warrant Or in nnv cnca ~ snee;Sadn,
act Of Congress. lie took the oron1d I, ,tat th;s ~
was not warrant IN he neaIo@ ~ tt ths IIt5 a3
cases eited The hor lin; maa hsla u hu snf :, oa ~
| property merely. not az hayino- comm;tted n
crime, In this view It would come nearer he.
| inr of the nature of A writ of rac1av;n Ard
| further. upon this warrant iIudoe Caton Ind DO.
| cided,
.Hr. Arrinq.oa, associated in the case in be-
half ot thc GoreTnmant n,ado a ,aa11oJ - ~ ~
! fuii arcument lie conte,dad that thara .raa sua
notb;n7 t1,ot ra,r;s.5 ~ tta.ot,a I":N1
| in ii Warrant Tho ertant of ;nr;ed;c,;nn Thst
Is a mntter of i,w not ~ al Ths ,sards - r.
hn Oh Lii he fonnd in ronr n;s+r;et ~
r11ESar1 IF JoF1 1hnr
vas sttii oooa md tha cnmn;ss;,na- ~ 49,
-;cbt a. ss33toe.' r,at es s 3:.:a ~ naa ~
E1nrress III. nrorase .,ns $500 ~. .,.n ~
| StotS >'s
Aca;n the warrant itse1f ,raz MT necess,rr
| since The owner ,nar nr NAV nj nracv1e II ~
rcciairninr his slsvc ~" A1
IL EHsf;. Continued +ho .~.,ur,a,. f.. .ho
| defiance NV ~' 'o' 'A4e
r. j.,o73 ,,,roa -, a.. r a., ..c
c ade thc n;nt ,Iat M anr ofant ~ te
rant wl,ich shm,,1 anthor;1o tha na1ro f;a, =,
rss;s, !, world enua1tv o,,,hor;1s anE ;.,a.;Tr
fr;snas IN a;S ., liz a1 Jasy n,s
mrra tha raasonu haforo sa. for,,, ,as,, ~
w. n,ai;d a19 r',;'l 'o &C. 4oA'o way '1'e "4''
| ~ fn"rt sa;d Tba mi, ,,as.;,,a In e,,.
c,i,ed ,nnn n cnns;Jar and sHaSa ~ ~ s+as 49,.
! or tIe cpss ~ D'''e" "s4@' ''st'e ~ @n's s'ase
| ~ Wse .,o -;+ u.,;, . a., -
| rai;d "As 'a' VIII ''4'a one Anu II
:SJ1 HAL the M,rsh,, os tho Sou,6l~p n;st,;c+
If .f1,;nn;a tha an,hnr;t,. ~ oo,,. ~ ,-st =;
tho Northx,-n n:,:r;et wbsre i,v tho ;ntS;c,neemt
ti,is ofi;n nca xas ,.iaood tn iovo cn,n,-;,ted
Is 10 The frst,. haye no doubt Tie law Of
| 7s5o undrr WIZ, ts case ia hroncht onthor. ~
:scs tsr- ;,sn:s1 .Ir !. aaTant ,:n':er c1rtoin
/ state ~, ;.rts rrhs s-;stonca " 49,, raa,,;-a.'
| facts is mt in t1,;s r,se controrertc5 1erson
was held as s,.rr in M;ssonr; H. ascan.J
into Illinois, Tie master Of the .lare annenrs
under the stutc or racts scr;bai as 1ecas.arv
| acted as thc 1s,r .r,hp,i1sz IN, ~ do ~
| ;,.rsd r.or-.nt ~ what H., ~ hao,, .,ea.., ~
| .nch ~ A' W." AA.~A ~
r. THE writ n uoa ,b;s.+aa +h,t :. h., m
seal ,vl,;ch thc connsai IN dsfanra 1nra ,,r<,aJ
Is imnl;ct in ererv vii The nnast;on hare -
| M, us tn usnai t1s,nr nor xbasl,ar thora go
mt son,e ;rr.",1or,tv - tho mada ~ th;s 1.r;t
| and ~Gathar 4 worii nj haro han,, ..ora ~
| farm had tl,a n = cnn,,,ss;orar -; -sd IL -
sal 1'''''~A 1''0
| Dut IA IT. ro;d hccaraa y ,.cts +b;, .a.1, =
| th;nt MT I,oro ~ Jorhts .sho.ho. ~ law.
renn;rc nnv senj n In nss5 h,,t hsra ~ danht
t,5t t1a i,ct ~ esai dnss ~ ,aade. ~
yoif. Thc trndencv of ,noiicrr od;nd,c,t;on "s
hos hcen - do o1.v ,;sh 4ho 1ast saadnsssn ~
the scal md to mnIe it, ahsenco Ea,;d oh;ec- -.
~ .,nds.n s.,,a:. oT 70 '!e sP.sll
rn,ad "1'1''' AD0 'o'ss'''o u o'e''
Tie next objection Of the counsel for the de-
fence the territorial point, is one in which there
tht;;fnv r,,yern. and nre.rrih.a to erarr officer
his territorial limits, rs when under State law
lis writ is his ,nide Int when ;he a conrt has M
power to so restrict, the Law is bis guide.
IN ny view !. Is not IN the power OF any cou,
rrecr;bed hy ia~ ~ f"r instance nr.s.c.;h;n" ~ u
10 an U. S. 51arshal any one or more countics
Q! the STATE, or limiting Sheriff in executing
as RoSeS ,S 10 an5 d aoMn In me .ne coan5 Inc
must be ro;l the wit o7 1he ,rstr;ct;o,, and IN
my opinion it is the latter, and that, disregard.
NY IT, the officer mus; serve the writ every
Thc nn.r nnest;on 10 ~ - tha =,
the words Of the statute, that 1he process "shall
run anywhere within the limits Of the State. u