The Nevada journal., 1860-11-02
County Nomination..
PHILLIP MOORE, of Nevada
Nevada County Deaocrntic Platform.

/ Nevada County Degenerate Platform,
/ ii: T. SwEErIASD, from the Committee on Reso-
MfiG's' reported tn. oitoacing Greed Of the Party
The Democracy of Nevada County assembled st
NrFa,a tfy, sept Sth lNG0, in accordance with
time honored custom, do adopt the following res
olutlons rs declaration of their prjuriulrs and
position i'll the Presidential contest of ISGn
BeSotral, That wchereby RI affirm the PRINCIPLES
announced in the Platform of the Democrati- PIT
/ at Cincinnati in June. 1851. y
RcSoirc9. That we cordially indorse the Platform
adopted by the Democratic PARTY at Blltimorr
July 20, 1869, in the Convention which dominated
JOHN {. BKECkINRIDGE and JOSEPH LANE be
Iefll@ mat the same contains the true and corr,r.
explanation of the Cincinnati Platform, aud the
only correct position of the National Democracy
upon the doctrine of Non Intervention
HdSOired, That the correct Interpretation of tho
principles OF Non Intervention is-That neither
by direct, indirect unfricudIv Legislation b,.
the right or the power to annul or impair the Con
stut"nai right OF any citizen Of the United States
10 take his property, of whatever character into
/ the common Territories, and hold the same thcra
while the Territorial condition remains
ReSojred, That all citizens of the United States
nav an equal right TO settle with th,ir property
III the Territories, and that under the decision OF
the Supreme Court, in the bred Scott case which
We recognize AS true and correct exposition of
th"pOw rs rcposcd in Congress over thc Terrific
RES h'linrF Congress nor Territorial I.cgisla-
turrs can interfere with or impair that right
He"tfe"' mat regarding the decision of the Su-
prem' Court rs binding upon all department. OF
Party TO resist all attempts to commit that party
To the doctrine that the Territorial I.c.rislIturr
contrary to any decision which NAV be- or has
bcGh rendered by that Court, NAV discriminate
eitlci Ill relation 10 persons or property IN the
lcftIofleS, which are tho common pos sessions Of
"a? hlted states, so ~ to give advantages TO the
citizens OF one State, which are not equally ar
sureu 10 those of every other State.
HeSCfted, That the old and well established doe;-
rihc oi me Democratic party, of - Principles not
hrn, l. superior to, and above all questions OF
regularity or irrcgularity of nominations That
hs Democrats, We are bound to follow where, prin-
clpIcs and not ambitious leaders Guide us and will
eSchcw all coalitions, fusions ANAL lyIinations
as subycrsivc of all principle, and ruling fcatur,
ruin. " "
Resotred, THAT we will give our undivided and
earnest support to the National Demo ratio Nomi-
necS, JoIN {. BHECKISRIpt,E and JOSEPH LANE
He+otre", That our rallying cry De, q The Con
stltutlou and the Equality of the Statrs''
ReS0ired. That the Democrats Patrv of Ncr.da
county, true now ever, TO the an.irnt princplrs
of the party, of opposition to all mouopoli.s do
hereby instruct the Candidates for SrIaf.. and As
scnbiy, nominated by this Convention, If elected
10 use thclr influence and TO cast their against
the Parsons Buikhrad Bill, if again presented or
any other scheme looking TO Bulkhcad Legislation
winch parta5cs of the character of a monopoly or
conicrs upon any Company, Association, Corpora
tlon or Body, the control of such cnt.rurisrs 10
their private and especial benefit.
HeSoltcf, That Stephen 4. Douglas received his
pretended nomination from iactinus and broker
up Convention, and in direct violation Of the two
thirds rule, which had been adopted for the GOV
crnmcnt of that body, and which had never been
res'inted, and by a body which conld not count
even majority in their favor if each delegate had
bHcn allowed to vote according to his own personal
preference.