New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-06-25


California, and Oregon. Georgia was represented in
plr, but old not vote.
Mi Church Of New-York offered the following:
to sssn d p Ssoaa hh.ns
tion ia according the rules Of ms CohFeion ana the aS
Of the Dtoa &c party declared nomiased 'E the Office Of
President Of tie United States.
Dir. Fourpoy of Arkansas wished another ballot
might be taken. They would make the vote stronger
next tine
Mr.. Church-You can make it strong as you
pl. ar afIeT the adoption Of the resolution.
acknowledgements tospeak eut, after considerable
Excitement and confusion, tb9 point of order vas
rsied that the rso solution was not in order, as it
changed the rule Of tue Convention.
Mr.. Church argued thet, according TO the decision of
the former char man at Charleston the solution only
The Pr, sideut ruled the resolution ID order.
Mi. Church explained the position Of New York in
this contest She bad been willing 10 yield all except
u rsoua honor, and The honor Of her constituents, 20
cOnCiliate and harmonic the Democratic party. But
when approacheds and told they must yield the caOd
date who was chosen and who was the choice OF the
Democracy Of the State, and, In addition admit uneoD-
ditionally 10 the Convention men who had seeded
without any uss cause they had spurned tue overures
They would now 40 home and sweep the State OF New
York as whirwibd Loud applanse.l They had at
Charleston voted 10 constTue tie twothlTds rule 10
mean twohfds of the vote of the Electoral College,
a. tie request of the South, who remained with them
on the pledge that if they 70 voted the South would
remain with the Convention. portion of the South
had broken the pledge and now this wrong consruc-
ton of the rule longer peace Offering. New
York was prepared 70 take all responsibility for the
resolution be offered. portion OF the South had
eeceded only for the avowed reason that a majority Of
the Convention chose TO d. eide the conestedseat
question against the wishes of the minority, and If such
action WAS iDdorsed by the party there would be an
end of all Conventions.
Mr.. Dunning Of Indiana made stirring speech in
favor Of Douglas the choice Of nineteen twenteths
Of the Democrats throughout the Union. He should
be the unanimous nominee Of the Democratic Conyen
ton, as he is Of the Democracy Of the Union.
Mr.. Cuttings Of Maryland spoke against the resolu-
ton He desired 70 ballot.
Sir. Church lbeu withdrew the resolution for
other ballot, MIR. Hoge Of Virginia declaring be would
move the nomination be unanimous the next
vote was declared.
Mr.. Sayes Of Rhode Island made in eloquent ad-
dress declaring that firm adherence to Judge Douglas
and his principles had alone enabled Rhode Island TO
wine out five thousand majority on the Black Repub.
hcan side, and carry the State by two thousand ma
jorty
David l.. Seymour on the part of the Dickinson
men of the New York delegation, said they stood in
peculiar position. They had used all honorable
10 secure the nomination Of the great son of New
York, Daniel s. Dickinson. Appause: But he was
now ready their behalf % ackno Wedge that great
majority of the people Of the State were IN favor OF
the nomination Of Douglas, and with one voice the
friends of Daniel s. Dickinson would rally 10 The sup
port OF the nominee.
MIR. Mason Of Kentucky gave IN his allegiance TO