Wilmington journal. [volume] (Wilmington, N.C.) 1844-1895, 1860-08-02
TERMS OF ADVERTISING.
Supreme Court.

By PEARSON, c. J-In Lawson v. Baer, from Lenoir,
affirming the judgment In King v. WOotten, from
Jones, affirming the judgment In Moye v. Moye,
from titt in equity. In Cornelius v. Glenn from Yad
kim judgment reversed and Judgment here for defendant
In Btauty " kee, in equity, from Northampton. In
Leggett V. Cofield from Martin, in equity sustaining
the demurrer. In Towes v. Brown, in equity, from
Wake decree for account. In Symons Reid in equity,
from Davidson decreta order to be reversed In Dalton
" Houston, from Iredell in equity, defendant Houston
entitled to the fifth part and to the 81 900 given by the
codlci ln Long Cross, in equity, from Cabarrus,
declaring that there Is in the order. In Doe
ex dem Ran water " Kelis from Montgomery, jadg-
ment and venre de novo In Robertson v. Kirby, from
Brunswick affirming the Judgment. In Mobiles "
Virgins from Pitt, Judgment reversed and venre de
novo. In Cape Feas & Deep River n Company v
Wilcox, from Chatham, affirming the Judgment. In
Morehead V. Atlantic & N. c. Rail Road, from Gull
ord two cases. declaring that there is n the order
In State V. HOnsworth ct al, from Surry, declaring
that there is in the proceedings La Roberts
McNeely, from Rowan, affirming the Judgment. In
Hendix V. Iarpey from Gulltord, in equity demurrer
overrued, In Lea " Brown, two cases in equity from
Caswe drectng the account to be reformed In Stock
ton V. Briggs, in equity from CASTOR, declaring that
there is error in the decretal order.
By BATTLE, J.-In Norheet v. Edwards, from Edge
combe judgment reversed and venre de novo In Laws
v n. y. Rail Road Company, from Orange affirming
the Judgment. La Cray Mathis, from W likes, affirm
ing the Judgment In Mizel V. SimmO- s, judgment
verscd and venire de In Smith Smith in equity,
|
and personal estate devised, and bequeahed, &c. In
Rush Miller in equity from Randolph, report set
and referred again. In Blackwell v Chipley, in
equity from hedell dismssing the bill with COSTS In
Mastin v Mastn, in equity, from Wilkes affirming the
order. In Dunn V. Dunn, in equity, from Union, in
junction to be modified. In Fisher v. Pender from
Edgecombe affirming the judgment. In King Whitley,
IRON Johnston, Judgment reversed and venlre de novo.
In Doe dem Richardson V. lhomston, from John
ton affirming the judgment. In Warren V, w ade, from
CasWell, judgment reversed and venire de DOvo. In
Glmer V. Mem uray, from GuilOrd, affirming the judg
ment. In Higgins V. n. g. Rail Road Company from
Guord, judgmen reversed and trial granted. In
Fulks V. Fulke, from Surry, judgment reversed and
venire de novo. In Myers V. " lams in equity, from
Rowan; negroes not to be emancipated, &c
BY MANLY, j. In Hassell V. Latham, from Craven,
.f fl ming the judi gment. In Doe dem Hill v Mason,
affirming tht judy nent In r dges Cherry, there a
no the order In Doe ex dem Jones V. Nor
fleet, from EdgecomUe, affirming tie Judgment In Par
ysu V. Strickland from axe, affirming the Judgment.
La Stroud v. Morrow, from Orange, affirming judg
mrnt. Iu State V. Worth, from Randolph, affirming
the Judgment In Sh,lby Hiatt, from Gulliord,
atfrnng the Judgment In State v. Worth, from Gull
lord, affirming the judgment. La Varker v. Vaker, in
tqay, IRON DaV lnson, decree for plaintiff. La Reeves
Y. Faucet, in equity from Orange, directing decree
for plauuf. In talr v Moss, from Cabarrus Judgment
reversed and dc In Griffith v ROseborOugh
rom Yadhiu, affirming the judgment. In Newman v.
AiIier, from Dnvle judgment reversed and jldgment
Ge'e for plaintiff. Ia Hinseman HnStman, from
Cab,rIus irung he Judgment. 10 thomas v. Thomas,
tqu'y, from Guitord, ii junction to lie modified aud
tn nutd. Ii. Kelly V. Purser, iu equity, from Union,
sustained and bl dismissed. In jackson V.
Jackson i'll tq9uy, from Surry.
Tue Count adjourned SINE de on Wednesday last.
-Raieish Register.
kIcto4 FL Woes of states