The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-07-25
The " t1is las5urg Kerry Contxovrs
err EoR S2O9 900 u slnsaLl
suYNyr oorsr-sPrGlb ress

suYuyr oOCsr-sPEcsAJ rgss
5Uy2 -Wd,om W,.osScnG tsacrs, astr,ris-a5o~.o o.
knden Hrs-s ard Jas r. Wd.erbtTy t>, B,il,ar-s-
burg Perm Co-rssy ant OArrs.--rhc ainuGl Ia this
case sued the defendant, a. esgnoes OF Oliver charlek
for 9th o. the proGts Of frry f1r ,ho ten
years. Toe srount clniaAod IS about $4,000 The
ter rctttcec 10 MI = & urediey ~hu has rendered
70 tho Court elaborate report OF which thc ollo~ag
is ep;oma TIE tsftree cais thai Rpuscn wAhcss,
AtuC1y '. bsans cad othera. were In pOssession OF
WILLIAMSBURG ferries BY virtue q compensation lease
Which would espu sidngiLof the Goth OF April 1879
m VIC Ea % sf9"meef, 1873, tvs instruments,
III cogi,erIst q each other, ~ere exc cuicd by
i,osr mc-t.oocf n TIE pieAssuSs Nr char
licS, by ~hcn e.onc ths leGe signed. boald
hinfcli aid bs assOcatf ~ Tut rerrssary eoat &c.
Tho Cc-psratol were 70 IN paid 50 go per aDuurn
quarterly psy ncns for tea years r,m the III ct Nay,
1873 1oC hstrunCnus ware signed by VI Cha-iick aud
fcur Others (dscEaautsl Tn instrument sgu1t the
rais Of III Ma! o. was 10. delivered, both pst~ having
enionct s e.iiyery u tsus remained tin the l.. Of
pusssi al by q Fepisyin proc =, which
The csy 90 not cctud. Subsequently lN associAtc.
s,h oh claim D. this lcaac u Wthers Tor the
sderston Of 500 Al the tine the latter instruments
vSs made b. ,ssrsk bis ass,gnces we're applicants W
TIE tonmnU Council Tor The ferry cas and which Char
LEX used hA enocavors ~ Itvcure When Chsrck nus
sssgncc The Dsgrees ken, the natter secret 10 coz
tuct tic Fuy capital had becn exported q s2nO 200
g. ucut al witch had Chalol contrbGtef o. thc 10Th
q Anvil 1870 III Williamsburg Fctry Company
gsr7ed xuh capital - also 90 to carry the terry
II
and h stoCsies ~ pro9rieors Of the lcarc ahcu, q
expire, stbovgh thcy were Charlickt assgUcce, 90
tened iiuu,tiou o. alst the ounlanys leeces and
The other CefNtsns, which. however sss ti-solvCl
Or dtrtgnrtcd, aid The fcrry FER a. above st,tca
hnuc 81 Sr ttafk6 as srres evr- cuntrsUtef scr.
vice. az none, the cuduct ~ the frry conmUDi
Gated 10 NF tharrks esscs the defendants the
a. -rrieit uG years after, Ntcu they unic basis
u a Gle FOR hitt II the profits which have ben
great The referee tier feT1ftCf that, q. master Of
Law the 81 the 12sh Of sspterbcr 1915 tauugh
aith al Tie forms and perhaps w,h ". quatts OF a
! nac wa vet in substance an CngaFrmcut by which
Nessrs Chrct Moore and associates agreed o. c7niuc
he ierrie O. ne terms Art oUusdcsatlOus M nluocd
that Il On undertaking 70 be performed ~ them,
each AID al Jointly uI the whole work and r th' whole
term that of The parties liberty 70 rescind
without The consent Of AL che rest there being personal
rcatcc on each al q then BY the Corpc' alton that
/ hc interest q sir Chsrck thcYeio SIMPLY In
tcrct IN the ~ 10 frum tis and their ioint
O. nance that u he 90 not rCriorD, NJ could there
torc have interest because there could be NJ iont
perfruafCc b. him with thom; that by the assignment
e. ulvs srd bis WeuCta,es Joint performance ty hir
YES impossible. thafiicks tntcses, estingushce
D.; Transferred TIE Siguccs thereb. acquired uobA G.
ant have cause q Nrtun sRs't the ferry COMPANY
siy of The defendants TIE complaint s thereeso dis
| uissst With iost
S.ruE rpox nFvt-o Two vesecls arrived nj New Or
| f..r, NJ tho lsvf~r