Clearfield Republican. [volume] (Clearfield, Pa.) 1851-1937, 1860-09-12


Tor congress b"cnn.o no, slho 'unNh'ri
ing advocate OF % protective tariff, ~ an
'he in'orc'" oil nee "hile labor viii 81
ways r'eei'' ms o''''e support
We arc hot 'n'o,u'u .0'I 'h' p''nlia
'"'u,'s' " 'I'o "''''' lAp'F are that WIl
''''' ''''" y "''''' support on
" '''' "''" "'''''.'' lnn'""e' compound "
,.'..' ""' ''.''S' "' ~ 'V "' ." per cent "
""'' u" "'''''n'} 'hsoliNR' ana hundred
|'' p'"' VINO I'"o'IhE mon VIII endorse
~ 'uo Io'''' 'Ho' no man oI our acqualn
""ee, mas moro uniformly supported sucI
interests Ihe 'Iulh is, Ncn, Patton has al
ways peeh the consistent advocate oihtar
."..sS''' LOT inc poo man Pnd we "II no
90 MN the injustice TO suppose, that IN the
contingency oi ms election to Congress, nc
would overlook either Princioalor Interest,"
Though resident Of the County, and al
active participant IN It's political cam
P"gnSi we nave mover heard uon, Patton
advocating the question ola protective ;a'
ni' yet we are free to admit that we
have frequently heard, from persons who
said thoy knew by experience, that Gen,
ration was perfectly orthodox on this
question, We suppose the Gen, like many
other men, is sound on the tariff as long
as it does not come out ofhis own pocket;
but we are afraid and 50 are the people of
tbs district, thotin Congress he might do
as the Black Republicans in the late Con-
gress did, vote to reduce the tariff,-vote,
to make free trade little more free -
SIMPLY, to crafty the Lords Of New En-
g'aho' we admire OoIdness IN any man
or party, but when 1t comes down to cool
instrumentation solely supported by un-
o'uShihS DrasS' II then becomes decidedly
700 strong ior US ana ol Just such char
"''oi "'o 'ne representations from time,
~ ''l''e ni"0e oy 'he oPposi'lon freSS, res
Pec'Ing' the question OF protective tariff.
''""'"Y I" me Teco'a as harmg only three
years ago. '0''" 70 'e0Hce NE Ea!g Of tbs
country S'T''S" nations q aoSlars gear, this
p"ty' yeS comes ow ""aTJuH SAL, as the uni> !
'oIIh ADVOCATES OF protective tariff.
Tgy>Se'eH b'acH HGpH6HcaHS and aJolstcntstS
u "' -" Congress- "tIow 'ohose rote' the tar
Vg 1916 co''d not hav been reduced; rotea
% reduce Hand still they are for protection.
10 the man, who is familiar with the wig /
Cling OF this party for fewyears, this cry .
1t protection recently set up, is extreme
y amusing for it is suggestive of some
rcldent', in which the party took rather .
m actpc part. 1t reminds us Of a candi-
late for Gov, Of Pennsylvania whose name
we believe is David Wilmot, man com
nItted, fully committed; for the past Is
ears to free trade policy. Just as ex-
rene 10 his free trade notions, as he is in
MS free negro notions; this wild free tra-
Ter, three years ago received the Black :
republican vote. The interests Of our
5leat State, were then considered perfectly
aie' IN the hands Of a notorious free trade
llclple. David, was sound on the negro :
uestlon and all other interests had TO
nccumb. We however suppose the year
6ol was free trade year TO this party, n
ina OF a leap year, and we would willing {
look over its shortcomings and back
lalngs had 1t behaved prudently since
'St "ih'er however II gave another Illus
'@uoh TO the country OF how the inter-
SIS OF pennsylvania are cared for when
ne almlgDty negro is III question The
tempt to elect uaIusha A Grow, speak
ol the House cannot and should not q
e forgotten tive another free ee'trader,
III control OF Congress and let him form =
ne committees on hls own free trade
oIicy ana then one James I. Hale, the t
rcat champion OF protection-the ster. '
hG iilend oil nome lndustry-the model .
Iack Republican; representingthe heav. )
st Iron Manufacturing Interest in Cen I