Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1860-07-13
AIlBmo!l0 E!!9!!l!ly
IS MrCinE, nuHNATASr, TYLER t wIsr
FRIDAY ,EoE.N:a&. JAZZ, ~, 1860.
Ihe tscil-Dou.lu. Organ or Virginia.


Fac fieil-Dnu.lu. Organ al Virginia.
liz lairrr>l manifested ;ur Mr. douglas H.
The i.lciIInnmd "Whig j. vlrlr SURPASSED b,
the zeal evinrcd inr Mr. lIieci. i.::riige hy TN
New lork "lrhunc' 'Ihccn!ari object ulholi
the "Nhi:; AMI ''rrIbnnr' Is lnc 'ic!2at y! bot!
wings OF the Democratic party. IL "Whig,
by ITS l;arIia!liy ior Mr. Douglas, cau induce nj
'rici'lS c put forward an electoral ticket com
posed rAr!tIsiyc Y Of douglas electors, lc elcc
toraI vote "f Virginia u.ay ir given 10 Bell
anu so cl argc lnr!i"n uf ;i,r :'Uuihrrn States
and II the "lribunr' ,al, induce lie friends u
brecK''lr!dge 10 ran III electoral ticket com
posed exclusively Of brrri, a:i'lgr electors, tin
State Of New lnrk will i,c saved 10 Lincoln,
Thus 'ipIii,,s c";:;i,irary rNisl.; North End
South against tl;c Democratic l,arly---;l ronSpi
racy 10 whrriIc ilr Democracy into the sr,ici.
da Jolly "i ~" tickets: viii She Democracy
Of Eirgin!E permit themselves 10 he defia,l,lctl
Of their jus! right To tie electoral ync Of the
State hy divisions III i!,rir ranks, which may
enablr Il mall plurality t" sc:m uImn ihe
vote?
The cSrla'atio.. Of ti.r "Whis'S" pretended
atiachmcn! h iir. Douglas il, 10 bc found in
the disappointment il I,as sustained in the st.
cclcrs i."t alai'ipainy The Dclnocratr parly
anu coalrSc!It; with ''nnc Of tho clements Of
opposition, iahely, :. iragurnrary portion,
known a> ttie Bell and Everett men. In latc
| issur the wig" says at WAS extreme folly
in tic ScccdcfS TO nu!nil:atc candidate ut all;
it was The prt Of policy and duty alike frr
them to acccIt the nomination Of Bell and Ev.
crctt And because they would not '.acrrpt
the nomination Of Bell and Everett" the
Wing scc1ls 10 have cspnusc,l the cause Of
Mr.. Douglas
Our bcili)ouSlaS contemporary hopes by
pretended hTor for ,dr. Douglas, 70 tlattrr his
friends int running an exclusive Douglas tick.
ct; thus with Douglas aud Ercckinrdgc both
in the iic!i, says the ''W!:ig," 'tirc friends of
Bell hayri! manifest in their power To carry
every Southern State" But our double
Shottsd bell AMI Douglas contemporary
builds hS hopes too much upon the
passions a'l too little upon the good SENSE
Of the Democrats Of Virginia Demcnte,, in.
deed, w0i',! be the party in Virginia to permit
tic vote Oithc State 10 hc given for John Bell
Who voted against tic twrlIy-tir>t rule and in
taS"r o! t!r reception Of Abolition petitions;
VIII" failed 10 vote upon the abolition Of the
slave trade i'll tie District Of Columbia: who
voted %itf ttiaSc Of Otto, Hale nt New IIamp-
,!IiIc Nmiin of Maine, Seward Of New York,
DC, &C., against t!.e Territorial Bill Of Utah;
whn Mied with the same men for the atl,us.
sim Of California. THE Virginia Democracy
may b. divided and distracted between Brcck-
inlidgc aGd Douglas, Int they will he Il unit
against J";r Bell the DETECTION liiat exists
in Virginia, If il conti,lrs. ramnnt defeat the
Democratic I,arIv in ii.,. S,at"---;r- nnl" i"l
clli p;!!i hc i" place s"r ser" eStiIIiab!r a1ni
worthy gentlemen far out Of the pHrty--lo e:lI-
harrTi.:; them and uursrl"r>, but u"t materially
TO iniurc cr cniangcr iiir .irkci.
The "Whis' has srcn lis party defeated very
often heiire--hr w hg' has aided the 'lcrat
ni lis party he'ore ~ it is doing now--tor
though il HES The rolors Of Bell and Everett,
Yet il rspo!Srs the cause and paraHes the
pro:prct> Of Mr. Dmglas, with even lnorr zeal
than it L"siows upon Bell and Everett.
las friends what The "Whig" very latc y said
Of t!r Douglas and how il esteemed him. We
do uot believe the "'Yhg' is g"ing at a"y line
t" openly r*inr>c the r;III,r Of Mr. Douglas,
however :" m':ci. lis present position may ap.
bear that way.