The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-04-13

three pieces Of the linen In eueson The plsint was
sksmihed anu testified 10 The handling Of the goods
bed ever touching the goO<g AS there
vas TO occason Tor cong 20, The marks being plain
mem ier t5c per yad TO whoever bought them. They
cened having IN any interered with plaintiff or
ms propely Beyond aeoompaoying the officer who made
lbe inquirer. when the Judge was about charge the
jury the counsel for the plaintiff withdrew the case.
ACTION FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT
Edua,d he'mmeH rs toakssng, satotstse and Ward -
This was an acuon lot fhss Imprisonment gro
The Hansaetobs above enumerated Alter the def ndaut
Ward bad made Inquiries Of Clsilin, Melt en- Co. about
the foe.s ue p.. oxeo ma ~ a'1 store, and there was
them to defendants sore No. Ill Broadway, anu from
there the Tombs and from there 10 the House of De-
enton in White street, here he was detaoet a wit
for twenty -four hours The plaintiff complained
this treatment and them references III this city
M Anderson and others TO his character and honesty
The ocer however ssd would defeat the ends OF JUS.
tice e take him 10 those people now but thai ne would
dttan him ar witness; that the inquiries as stated 10 the
above made and the parties became satisfied
that ,he plaintiff was hepesy 10 OF the goods
he WAS discharge the officer handing him 80 Tor The
| trouble and Inconvenience he mad been put TO-
lhe plaintiff ihs had called for jury trial,
but after the disposition of the last case, he waived the
| jury And insisted trial before The Court Alter
hearing the testimony the part OF the plaintiff, the
Judge ordered Dopsuit 10 the defendants Conxlpe
and Sa~iele, whereupon plaintiffs coanse, Withdrew
| The case as to me defendant Ward.
April IL -Lsmrei Wells u.s. The Norshy.{yon WORKS
This suit brought TO SIS "a for quantity
OF copper brass and iron sold defendants by plaintiff
Prom the evidence appeared that In harcn last. plaintiff
havrg some ftun 70 sell called OF The defendants
officers about H. who told him TO bring there and il II
answered certain price would be paid for it, tina, subse
ouehty and in the absence OF the officer the goods
ft at the oe ndans place. that when the party had
been spoken " about buying returned he repndsted
any bargain and insisted the goods not repre-
serted and requested the plaItT TO take them away.
While talking about the matter third Arty appeEed
claiming the goods or the value OF them and the plaintiff
TO get rid OF him. gave an order defendants for SoS
The secretary Of the company refused 70 ACCEPT the order
or purchase the goods but after much solicitation from
plaintiff told him 10 call agan ut four O'Clock that same
day, and he would see what he would do about H. In
about an hour after this conversation officer called
with an attachment ard removed all the goods, ~ the
property of the plaintiff Tho plaintiff did cali at tue
tme appointed, bnt did in week AFTER aad demanded
his whole BILL which defendant refused TO pay, the
ground that DO bargsp or Gale had been made per
ected and secondly, that the goods taken from
them BY process of lag to pay plaintiff debts The jury.
however, found a verdict for the plaintiff for $50 w.