The Cadiz Democratic sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1854-1864, 1860-06-27
CADlz OHIO, WEDNESDAY, JUNE s7, 1860

! MED the right Of the Convention, which "
n simply delegated body. to imose any conditi
at all upon the seven seeding States. "a
3 plauSe and hisses.) He also denied the poll
of making such terms to the seceeding Stat
for they would not accept an entrance into I
Convention on sGch terms. The party was
fight battle at the polls in winch it would
necessary to unite all sections against the o.
position party.
llnge, Of Virginia, demanded to know whe
er delegates were to sit here and submit to Il
insult Of Kisses from the gallery, when senl
rnents favorable to their friends of the Sout
and in which they themselves coincile, wei
expressed by a gentleman Of such respectable
ty as Randall, of Pennsylvania. If this on
Go pressure was to be brought up to crush ou
fairness Of discussion, Virginia had better kno
it at once, and retire from the field in whiC
she is prevented from defending her rights
Loud applause
The President announced that if the. CALLER
les gave utterance to such signc Of dsapproba
ton, they should be cleared.
Nh. Samuels, of Iowa, while anxious to pre-
serve to every man the right te be heard un:n
terruptedly, he could not but say that NANTES
tations of applause were calculated to draw
forth manifestations of disapprotation. Boil
should he checked or both allowed.
Mr.. Randall said if any serpent like hisse
had been uttered, he had not heard them.
He then procse lei to enlarge upon tn, right
of the seeding delegations, and urged concili
alton AMI harmony in the action OF the Con.
vention. He concluded with an eloquent ap
peal to the party to unite against the common
Zoe. ~H
Mr.. Richardron, Of Illinois, was opposed tc
the resolution of the gentleman from Pennsyl
vania, because it sought to let into the Conven-
ton persons who were not delegates to this
Convention a. all.
Their constituents had refused to send them
here to seek seats, and although gentleman
from Florida had informed him that the dele
cation would take seats in the Convention if
the olive branch was extended to them, yet he
Tor one was not willing to sit beside gents who
no constituency, AMI who were
bound by nothing that is done by the Conven.
tion, while he hmselfwas bound by every thing.
tie was further opposed to the amendment be-
cause it proposed to admit the delegates from
Arkansas when a contesting delegation was an
bounced to be here from that State Was the
Convention by this resolution to preju lge the
case. Mississippi came here accredited and
without opposition, AMI she was placed in the
list with these other States. When contest
'riseS it should be investigated by Commit
zee.
Voce-Why was it not so done at Char,
eStOn?
Richardson Because at Charleston, when
c'ion was taken. there was no regular organ.
zatinn Of the Convention. Now it was differ.
mt, and he was in favor of an investigation
nto he Iacts wherever there was contest
Fhe proposed investigation could not consume
ouch time, and he repeated that it should be
made, in justice to all parties. He said he
bould not be drawn into the notice of any
ssues not directly pertaining to the question
before them.
Corhrane, of N Y, said this question was
ot one Of admission Of new delegation; it was
I far graver importance. A portion OF the
eats on this flDor were vacant and question
are they thus vacant? The oues
ION also arises, Was tnere justification, was
here xcuse for the secession that had left
orlion Of the seats here unoccupied? How
yer this might he decided, he deemed it well
,r the convention to seek to bring hack their
rring brothers. He was not favorable to eth
r Of the resolutions as they stood. He was
nwiling to place any obligation on the rourn.
,s delegates that would call blush to thr
leeks or eau e a pain to their hearts, but it
lould be remembered that such terms were
laced upon the delegation from New York
pom former occasion, and there might be
ow excuse for its being offered by New York.
lie could assure the convention that they |
ould always be found, as they hitherto had
sen found on the side Of Liberty and Justice.
applause ....
Mr. Montgomery, of Pennsylvania, regretted
Iat the previous question had not been insisted
oon when first moved, and the time of the
onvention saved. AS discussion has arisen.
,wever, he desired to say that the pledge
Nv required was proper one. (Applaus.)
is colleague had stated that no MN could b..
'und by any such resolution. He told bis
legue that every man who was a Democrat
ID man ofhonor, was bound BY the acton
the Convention. If he refused to oe 50
'und, ne was no Democrat. (AppauSe) Ii
5 collegue from Pennsy lvania refused to be
bound, why, the sooner he left the party the
tter for it.-lle was, for one, unwilling to
init these delegates to this hall, in order to
able them to sece 1e in different form.-I
.oud spplause.) Mr.. johnson, OF Maryland.
'ped Tor the credit OF the State of MARYLAND
ID especially for the city of Baltimore, that i
lese demonstrations Of applause from galleries
oud no longer disgrace the city. lie moved
clear the galleries.. [Cries OF NO." MOL
Mr.. Cuttings, Of Maryland, said when the
plause had been given to those who had
oke on the other side, his colIegue had been +
ry willing to let 1t proceed. Now. as it was
lied out by the IN inIy sent ments ofthe gen
'man from Pennsylvania it was veIy often.
70 IN his ear. [lau ,h,sr AMI ap )lats.l
Mr.. Montgomery said he was accustomed to
is thing. At had heard ths hisses of mob
Oh lreston. Whsn one IN n from the Ssats