New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-06-08
Geaal Notifies.

TN PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate
on 81 hahn sR SC eIass eSi ELzIBETH DARs
S hereof to HOLMES one Of the sub
s v % S 'ss s sS d d xs
next-Dated New York he 9Th dsy Of Feb6TgsIy 1860
no1awemF JAMES fasA Il DAR H:E'' Executors
IN PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate of
Il the County Of NewYork notice by given 70 peson.
having caIns against HENRY sPERY late of the City c Of
thereof the subscriber at his store No Az Broadway
e em me f os Rs day Mach
I'm PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate
of The doSTy S SsTf6 Pssf ae Of 70 n
CITY Of York wegher deceased to present the with
&c ass2 'ss % S@ss
CITY o. S5o ee first dY 6 2ifSi GOV New
ANNA DEMAREST
mhaO lawGmoF* Administrative Of said deceased
IN PURSUANCE Of an order of the Surrogate
perrone having claims gai, MARTIN UNGRICH late Of The
vouchers Thereof 10 the subscrber at the Office Of cHARLEs
on o. before the let dy of October nextDaed NewYork
fhe 29th day Of March, lse0. ,..,,- ,.,.,,,o,,
ml3O 1aw6mF LOUISA UNGRICH, Executrix.
CUPREIiE COURT Of the STATE of NEW
y YoRKcIITY y, end COUNTY Of NEwrYoRK dsR
reouied 10 answer the complaint which win be
filed the Office Of the Cok Of tie City and County OF New
copy your answer the sd compliant the subscriber at
his Office Welt in the City Of New York aforesaid
within twenty days after the service OF this
complaint within the time aforesaid, the plaintiff ia this
action viii apply 70 the Court for the relief demanded In the
Frederick HUGHsoN, Plaintiff Attorney.
The complaint IN this action was eea in tie Clerk; oa 1
day Of Nay, 1860 i. HUGHs0N, Plaintiff Attorney,
nyl8 laiswF NO. 81 Wsll.st, N. Y.
CSUPREME COURT.-City and County of
~ New-York-JEsSE Is. SPELMAN and TIMOTHY NJ.
SPELMAN against JOHN SAURAN.-Summons for money
demand contract Com not served To the above named
Defe hereby summoned and required to
the compnt this action, which will be filed in the Office Of
Clerk the CITY and County Of NewYok Il the City Hal
in said city and to serve copy Of your answer to the sad
way (Cifey Buildingl in the City Of New Ok within twenty
days after tie hereof exclusive of the dy Of such
time fortud the plaintiff IN this action will take judgment
agns; sum Of hundred and seyenty-nne dollars
and ineyhree with interest from the 10Th day of May
thousand eight huudod and sixty, besides the costs Of this
+. =. STEWART, Plaintiff. Attorney.
The piut IN the aboyerned action fled In the
Office Of the k q the City sid County Of New ok on the
2etb day o. May l9C0--Dat-d New-York May % 1860
jel lswCwI' I. L. STEWART, PLAINTIFF Attorney
CUIREME COURT.-James II. Brush against
~ samuel Lewi, Caroline Lewis SGsannah g. Young, Oliver
Yong MoIia Young Hely lounss William II. Mead, Eliza
Jcfnon Fisher Julia s. Fi.GeI Edward A. Whitaker Mary
a. " lialeT Charles u. Clarke William Clarke and Mary
bis vile and Philip Willie Notice is hereby given to al Per;
ueTe ha by Judgment decree Ia the land sough; to be
Ieioed n tls action known No 40 Nandewaterst, in
he City II Newlo to produce e the snbcrioera ms office
No ~ Ns-st n the Ciy Of Ncwl ok or before July
1860 proo Of III such liens and ucumbranees together with
satisfactory evidence Of the amount due thereon
ie8 lov-GwF JOHN a. WEEKS. Referee, No. 81 Wsllst