M'arthur Democrat. (McArthur, Vinton County, Ohio) 1853-1865, 1860-03-29

tleman on the floor ought to oppose
while II protested against the viola
ton OF tho constitution and laws, in
taking the mohey from the hcasur,
by the executive officers, tiully recog
nized the faithful application Of ever.
dollar to the public service. II thi
is adopted, Mr.. A. said, several mem
EhsFs Siths minority will vote for th
appropriation bill, but for bis Owl
part, he could not do it, as be We
committed against it, as long as th,
item remained in it.
The yeas and nays were demanded
OIL this amendment, and resulted
yeas 63, nays 29-as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative
were--Messrs. Andrews, Blocker
Brown. Bruff, Burr, Buss, Carter
Ohoate, Clapp, Ceilings, Converse
Coover, Cory, Cox, Devore, Flagg
Gamble, Haddow, Hamilton, Harlan
Hills, House, Howell, Hughes, Hutch
esOn, Jacobs, JessuP, Jones, Of Sene-
ca, Krum, McClung, McGavran, Nc.
PheBon, McSchooler, Monahan
Moore, Musson, Nigh, Noble, Ogle
Parrott, Rees, Of Franklin, Rees, Of
Morrow, Reisinger, Robinson, Rog
ers, Rukenbrod, Schiff, Scott, Of JET.
fersOn, Slusser, Snyder, Stedman,
Stiers, Tanneyhill, Taylor, Thompson
Of Perry, Thompson, Of Summit,
Truesdell, Vanvoorhis, Voris, Welsh
Winner, Wood, Wright, of Warren.
Those who voted in the negative,
were-t Messrs. Baldwin. Blakeslse
Carlisle, Chase, Davis, Fellows, Gore,
Herrick, Hitchcock, Jolly, Kennedy,
McCune, Myers, Parr, Pearce, Pow.
ers, Scott Of Warren, Sears, Skinner,
Squire, Steele, Trimble, Vincent,
Walker, Westcott, White, Woods,
Wright Of Hamilton, Speaker.
Mr.. Sears demanded the previous
question, which was sustained, whe n
tue vote was called on the passage OF
the bill, which resulted-yeas SO, nays
36-ss follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative,
were Messrs. Baldwin, Brown, Bruff,
Blakeslee, Burr, Buss, Carter, Choate,
Clapp, Colliugs, Coover, Cox, Flagg,
Gore, Haddow, Hamilton, Harlan,
Herrick, Hills, Hitchcock, House,
Howell, jolly, Jopes of Seneca, Ken
nedy, Kerr, Krum, McOlung, Nc
Cune, McGavran, Mcpherson, Mon.
ahan, Mussen, Nigh, Parrott, Rees of
Morrow, Rukenbrod, Scnlff, Scott of
Jefferson, Sears, Slusser, Squire,
Stedman, Steele, Stubbs, Tanneyhill,
Thompson OF Perry, Thompson OF
Summit, Trimble, Trcesdel, Van.
voorhis, Voris, Walker, Watt, Welsh,
Wood, Wright OF Warren.
Those who voted in the negative,
were--Messrs Andrews, Blocker,
Carlisle, Chase, Converse, Cory, Da.
Wis, Devore, Fellows, Gamble, Hughes,
Hutcheson, Jacobs, Jessup, McCon.
nell, McSchooler, Moore, Myers, No.
Bile, Ogle Parrott, Pearce, Powers,
Rees OF Franklin, Reisinger, Robin.
son, Rogers, Scott of Warren, Snyder,
Steele, Taylor, Vincent, Wescott
White, Winner, Woods, Wright oI
Hamilton, Speaker.
Mr.. McCune moved that the vote
by which the House passed this bill be
reconsidered.
Mr.. Robinson said he hoped the vote
would not be reconsidered. He had
voted for the amendment of MIR. An.
drews with the understanding that it
was compromise; but the vote show.
ed that it was not 80 treated, and he
wished now to reconsider the amend.
meDt and have it negatived.
Mr.. Nigh said he hoped the amend.
ment would be reconsidered. He vo.
ted for it in good faith, because he
thought it right, and he could not but
express this oensure upon what he
deemed a policy that ought to be dis
countenanced.
Mr.. Robinson objected to the in
jecting OF stump speech into the ap
preparation bill. Itwas admitted thai
the act Of the officers was right; anc
he could not be induced to censurC
them without any apparent justilyins
motive.
Mr.. Flagg appealed to the HOUSE
to let the bill ana amendment stand
He thought that it was time to de-
nUuncs the violation OF the writer
law. Vrhe adoption ofthis protest wa
certainly drawing it very mild" l
told the officers as mildly as we cal
tell them that the act ought not to b.
done. -....
Mr. Parrot said he had voted 70
this amendment gladly, because it CAV
HIM an opportunity to vote Tor tn,
bill. BE would noteenspre the men
but the act, as in opposition to the la,
and the constitution, he must yot
against it.
Mr.. Scott, of Warren, hoped tn
motion to reconsider would prevail
lie had voted against the amendment