, 1860-06-02

out invitations for dinner marty at their house
On the following Mn,1av


Anne the complainant returned from the SUNDAY
school, Of which le was the superintendent,
Hen held upon the north side Of tue Chactgo
Rlrcr- Suoa ntter the comp!Aiuants return
rom the Sunday School, bc inquired Of this ae-
[endant IT she knew ihat some ladies' On the
North side. 1wo yaars before thst time, were 60
ing to drop her acquaintance on account Of her
intimacv with the said Stuart; at which inqui.
IS 1Gis defendant expressed some surprise and
real:ed thereto in the oe ,atiye. This defendant
shta asked who Tho ladies referred 10 By the
were; but the complainant would
give her noinfotmation. The complainant then
inquired Of this defendant in regard to what
had tran. pred between the said Stuart and her
ae!f, and she truthfuliy told him Of every thing
which she then recollected. Upon that occa.
sion lie inquired Of her Ii Sue had eyer been
crin'inst with said Stuart, and she truthfully
10 know Thy he could ask her such Questions.
Az that time this defendant IVES titting upon the
floor at the comp!ainanl's Sect, end ia reply to
her inquiry lie said toter: 10
'' twp! that il nc 5,lace for you:" The
complainant then inquired Of her why she had
received attentions from gentlemen other than
himself; and she told him that l,ehnd neglected
her for years, md under the belief that be dis
liked lcr, tee had received attentions from the
said ioyd and the said Stuart, both Of whom had
a'%ay been very courteous and polite to her,.
which attentions she never should have receiTdd
had tAe complainant been kind to, and not neg.
lected her, That she wax satisfied she had. oy re.
csirias such attentions. ~ronged and .G)nfea
the complainant, and sincerely regretted that
sue Ind done 80. The complainant then re-
marked that the had not bsen Us kind and atten'
tire to this defendant rs he once was, II was ne
cause be lad been 50 much enEroasea IN oas,-
meas. Tic conversation Has then suepende1:
nnd nothing insther upon the subject Was sra sa'a
until the complainant and this defendant we're
returning from church in the evening OF TINS
duv. yhcu she remarked tn him that she vas
,,ra;itied al,a. abe had tG!d him Of every thing.
as it had relieved her mind OF great burden,
aud he scplled that he was also g1aa'hed: !has
night they occupied the same room ana neo: as
they had alsays done before TINT time. And
this defendant shcu supposed aud believed that
the complainant was entirely satisfied.
This defendant further savs that on MONDAY,
January lG,l, 1sGt, End in the morning OF that
d.v. she remarked 10 the complainant, that she
lad been 40 much distressed BY what had trans
',ired within the few days then lust past, she
wout1 prefer 10 POSTPONE the dinner to be given
tha. day. tn sntn. future time, and he assepted
there;, Nothing further transplred until the
comna:uaut came hume to dinner. Upon his
return ut that tiue, hc went ur statrs to this
deienAant's room very much excited, and SAID
to her ,hat she had not told him Of one half Of
Whit she had done. lie taen r1olessed 70 feoo
to her from letter that he pretended to hare
received from said Carlisle Boyd tha: morning
lin rep|y 10 the one which this defendant wrote
10 him two davB before): ut was not me, but
apotber that coticed your wife from the path
"of virtue to t1At OF shame and dishonor-
and he then charged this defendant with crimi-
nal conduct, not only since, bnt before their
1na-rixoe, aud appled to her every vile. oppro-
b:lous. and insulting mime he could THINK OF.
lie asserted that be had the evidence, and could
proye The guilt Of this defendant, aud that tlere
was no use in denyjug it. and said lie should
ssnd her to Albany iataediately. This defend
ant in The most suemn manner, over and over
acaln. aud upon her knees. protested that she
was innocent, and lmplored The complainant 10
beIieyc her. and to tell her what reason be had
fur making sucl, charges, but in yain. Again
md again this defendant supplicated Of the
c,mp!ninant 10 explain why he made such cruel
charges ngainst her, sud every time Us she ap-
proaehed him for tilai purpose. he threw her
irom him with tue lmost brutal force aud yio-
]cuce, The OILY Information that sue could
obta:n from him, was his repeated assertion
that she h,d been guilty Of criminal conduct
with Uayid :;:u0rt-mentioniug the time when
ths s1;d Farnau called et the complainant'6
house, uad Was refused adnittance Us aforesaid,
Us oae of the times Wien she ind been 80 guilty
and his assertions that he had the evidence
t, prove this defendants guilt, and that any
tlenial Of it would he useless.
This defendant cnuu0t describe CT give M nd
cqua:e idea Of the terrible violence and severity
OF th= sonplainaat's manner and language up.
on that occasion. S!:c was satisfied that some
one lai reported aud falsely represented to the
comp alnaut wlsat had lra'sspired, when the said
Farna'a called at the c-mplaicaut's house and
was refused admittance, Us aforesaid, and what
had transpirea a. other times between the said
Stuart and this defendant, and so excited and
e1Asperated wls tho complainant, Tint this de-
fendant leared iintnediase expulsion from the
house, aud tile disgrace which would neccssari'
y be attendant thereon. Havlng these 'mpres-
sionk and viii, view to save herself f!om such
- satisfy tue complainant that his suspicious
were unfoundcd, this defendant begged Of the
complainant to send for her uncle, Mr. Corning
aud wait until he came, when she hoped she
would be able to satisfy tue complainant Of hel
Innocence. Whsreupon. the complainant said
he would send for her uncle, and that nothing
whateves, should be done until he came, anf
several times repeated these assurances in ths
most solemn manner.
And t,,;s dcGcnda,t rc1v;nc unon tha s,;.
nron,;scs nnd sssura,,ces rf 3he cnrnnis;nant
nnd hr,ievinp thst ti,e ssyne wcrld he }at1,fnll,
kent nh niserve' md to nravanr him fron
ut once il hia frenzy thrustinp her ant Of hi
louse. and forever discracipr her. falseI
said to linn. swell, have" The cutnpiainan
then insisted lint this defendant shauld ac
knowledge that &be had bee3 cuity fittec,
times. to which she exclaimed. "OA. no, Fath
,er: am not guilty. cannot eay fifteen times.
Tbs complainant then insisted Tint this de!eud
ant sfoud ncInowled1e Tint ,.l,e Ind t,e m mil
t. ten t;mes: ana this dsfendant urnin asserte
Err innoccnce asa rcasnn ,yts. RI couid m
nekno,yle 4ra lint sin had haen on;tv so mon
tin,os. Tie comnIainant rhcn sa;a HWeii
then sar w, l,ava i. m nn;itv of sdrl,arv
Stuart." ard th:s dcrentlant gaIsely aid i Yea
have !, sn' Tha comnf";ront ,hon i.fl 4b;s IA