New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-03-20
Ia w INIE.LLLGE.NClE.
SUPREME COURT-5PEcIAL TKsN-MARcH l9--botoos
Justice lsGRAHAM.


Justice isGRAHAm-
THE SEw-HAvEs RAILROAD CASES.
The New Haven Railroad Company age john NJ hes@nso' ~
Three hundred othsrs -.
This is ths celebrated omn'bus suit, 10 winch " ia
he question Of The liability Of the railroad company
mali good ne stock Of lsd By Robert sen sr
is fcrmer PIe.den amounting % 5000 cS ne ca
George Wood, esq, the trial was postponed ua' ''n''"
TS sIiuH. were represented by William Curtis Moves aad
William Tracey and the deendan Py Ds9el LG,p a IA
This Is an important case aud viii probably occupy t"o@
The complainant ASKS that defendants be compelled to
Tb claim that the Company liable for the acts Of
Schuyler in issuing the .OS he SDs sSs Ss as az %
that Company liable for the money paid Tor 'uch
s''eA CHAMBERS Before Justice ALLEN.
Jones az. Underwood
ALLEN Ut is well settled, hrst that me ststrteA
IN cree a. the right Of the party 20 costs became hxsd
cono taxation m the item: % be allowed 70 tbs a
Sorwood Al 2sj Second that the rishs
fixed Up,n the coming ia Of zoe verdict "a sn9.s
Burnett sst WestfA Is Howard all Tory ssi haiy
party is entitled to have his adjusted BY The fee bill In
force at time Of the verdict Moere sg WesterVes Ii
b or adjustment Of costs to be Inserted in th
udSment Code sec ~ bill should be led kJ
that the v, rdict which the sas T.
should be that yereic upon Ssics tas j1s Of %nios
of ms!ria and did not give 10th ATTY judgment
m would be conceded that Il the fra. srs had been set
aside sgans, evidence ape the adjustment Of
amer second verdict in the sGS But tbs adjustment Of che
CT incident TO s so,x If the udsneut and ha
verdict judgment being and held for nalgh,u all
the incidents o. ootn is 18th Had the fee bill been 50
rs. pensatiOu Of the plaintiff for services upon
he lee OH e the time of the first verdict aud saju'tm snf
been claimed to the adjustment OF the cos
9nuei verdict would have precuded him cam
ngtbe Gceased As he would not have been
stop, Led by that adjustment, the defendant is not.
he clerk In disregardng the iormer adjustment ana
resd0sng the cots according to the lee Gil In frcs d
| the time ofthe rendition fine last verdict. -
any item has been omitted by the clerk which would be al
owsbe under tie present fee bill should be err
dered But understand this to be claimed The NOTES
! Is therefore denied, but without costs.
| Before Justice SUTHERLAND.
| DECISIONS.
| George E. Myers sgt James Crow ct al-Repor
confirmed and order granted.
| In re. the petition of Kate Sulvan-Prisoner dis-
| charged
George Seckel sgt. Mary Seckel.-Rsport confirmed
Robert Ross sgt. VIM G. Chave.-Order for att sch-
denied without but the plaintiff proper notice.
take order that defendant assign his real estate
IL re. he Application OF Mary JaEe hitlock ct al
Report confirmed aud order granted
In re. Geo. A. Trautman, Lunatic -Tois order
would appear to be unnecessary The previous order Is
sufficient.
Chsuncey W. Moore, ct al agt. s. s. Crandel OF al.
Order for judgment granted
Myer Ii. Meyer sgt Leon Won Colen, ct al-Orders
refused.
George j. Byrd ct al. agt. William Msysr.-0rder
granted as amended.
Same agt Same.-Order granted.
In re. petition of John w. Marsh, OF al in infants, to
sell, ac-RepOrt cqniImed ; and order granted
In re- the petition of the Trustees Of the Methodist
Episcopal Chureh-Order settled 90
Joseph Champion agt. Margaret Champ on.-MotiOn
for su ony allowance denied beyond taxable costs 10 the
defendant