Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1860-10-09
RUFEsIN'S
PH0SPHOR-PERUIlAN GUAN0.

AN now ready 10 supply orders for my lerillzeFs as
fast as they in All may rely nnon scttns, WIN
en In the phosphate ingredients, from anything ese IN
market; and hcter because 1t contains more pure bes.
PHOSPHATE op LIME ihau any other Manipulated Guano.
fhe results Of arplyn. my preparations 10 wheat .hs
past have heen favorable could be cSiecei
under the combined disasters Of joint worm, ny, rust, anu
most Of u the drought, which prevented HE present Ia
yorablc action Of the phosphatrs 10 very great extent
the time the wheat vas grainng But the mass OF inc teSt
noy Is that equal superior 10 PERUVIAN uuano OH
lands dot has proved it. superiority under fair
producing good stand Uf Cl"Yer II Is struc uat
al failures have been reported; but they were such ~
mHpuRior hears Of sometimes due 10 'he idG, '"' M W.
and did not need phoSphaes but most seneraiy 10 Ie
worst for both wheat anil clover have ever known.
The beet evidence Of the value OF my manur' 70 , mr
found in the fact that have orders Tor more lan iou
times ms much rs had at the snme period ast year.
Persons who are Induced 10 try my Euano, rom 'ncI
experience, the representations OF others are Ar
cunry requesrd To order Runs Guano and to see that
they gei it, rs there manipulated articles " e
market.
IL can he had of myself or the commission merchants
generally in Richmond or OF my agents. THOMAS
BiANcIi SONS, Petersburg: 81. IoILINs CO.. Lyrch.
burg HUGH SCOTT, Fredericksburg; MASON MAKiiH 4
Sept 4-cH FRANK. G. ECFFlN:
VIRGINIA.-lN CHANCERY.-ln King and Queen
Circuit Court, May I'd, 1860:
William Taylor, Plaintiff,
Against
james P Garrett a1I Henrietta f. r. Garrett his wife,
Robert Iemuel Garrett and John A. Garrett, pci rs
This cause came this day, to be heard upon inc n
which has hcen regularly taken as confessed as 10 al
defendants the exhibits filed with The BILL ami was asuc
by COUNSEL upon consideration whereof, the Court no' a"
juIGr order aEd decree, that one OF The Cnniss'ones W
this Cor do take the following accounts frS' an account
Of the debt or debts due from the defendant James
re to The plaintiff second that c enquire as 10 te Vaiue
OF The slaves referred In the BILL and they nave pee
soh by whom the amount for which lney Wee
ana who received the proceeds OF their SAFE Iui t", w
take an acooun. OF the extent and value OF thc
the said James T. Garrett In the estate OF ianer o
Garrett deceased. aud Of the same In Inc estate o
mother, Mary Garrett and also OF The Taue OF lhe
Of the said Henrietta F. Garrett In the estate oil er Ia
ther, and make report to this Court, with any ihh'G s
ciay stated deemed pertinent by himself or required 70 DC
80 stared by either Of the part!es and the saia
er ahRll have authority examine the parties III soe
form. touching any Of the foregoing enquiries.
Copy-Tcsie; T. r
conuiss,oxERs OFFICE, September q, ls6o;
The parties interested In the foregoing decree are hers
notified that have apDonted the 29.h day OF OCTOBER
next the time and King md Queen Courtousc Us me
place. for taking the and making he enquiries IT,
Quired thereby-at which time and place tncy VIII Peh
attend, at ~ O'clock 4. NJ with all TIE evidence
TO enable me to take the said accounts ana report upon
the said enquiries. :,
sept 25-cw4w S, !. HARWOOp. Com q
VIRGINIA.-In The Clerks Office OF the Circuit
Court Of the city Of Richmond, the lst day OF ocfo'
her, 1860
=. NJ Wright and Ann Roberta Wright, his wife,
Plaintiffs
Isains,
The object OF this suit is obtain decree against the
defendant Wians lireeu administrator with the will an
neScd OF Martin Slaughter deceased and his surehes
the unpaid balance Of legacy OF ten thousand dollars be
qucathed 10 the pllniG Ann Roberta by the said NHn
lp1, ham