New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-06-14

pubcsns Of foreign brh at Chicago, are received with
great favor by adopted citizens Of Ill classes hrougbo
The country In every direction we hear Of thossswho
heretofore led by the deceptive name Of Democracy
into the support Of Slavery are now TYadiaiw that
and Justice. They will not knowingly inaor.s a De-
mocracy that consgns the weak and unprotected TO The
slavery Of the strong and rapacious." 4eM
A correspondent ct Muncie, Ind, sends ns the fol-
lowing account of debate at that place on the 7th
;ps, between the rival candidates for Governor:
"Mr. Hendricks opened the discussion in a speech
of one hour. He said he had no special defense 10
make on behalf Of the Democratic party, became The
history and uits Of that party were on the records Of
the past But that be bad something 10 say Of the Re-
publican party He then spoke at length on The qres-
lion OF the power that has been in the hands Of the Re-
publican party since its organization IN the general
and State Government, appealing 70 toL Lane
when he spoke to tell the people what good The parry
had DONE After leaving this part OF the he
then spend half hour in the discussion Of matter
that involves little Encouragement Of our swamp
snds by of our State officer, elecedb fasonss
and Know othings, or Americans, in 1854; matter
that has been matter of history here for several years
and not controyered by any one. Had Col. Lane been
absent and no else been the speech
of Mr. Hendricks would have been applauded Of
great excellence and force, and would have made o
damaging impression against the Republican party.
Mr. Hendricks managed his side of the case well. His
assertions were abundant enttle him and bic party 10
a prima facia case. The misfortune however, was,
that the assertions were i'll founded and could no, b
established by evidence, and that COL Lane was pres
en 10 refute Them Col Lane then addressed me peo
ole. First oyerthrowing the argument advanced BY
Mr. Hendricks in regard to the power portion OF his
speech stated that since the organization OF Tho
Republican party the party has never had salhient
power, either in Congress or in our STATE gsla'urs
10 pass single bill party measure; that was true
in Congress the Republicans had the majority IN tho
Lower House, but had against them the Senate aud
Executive; that il was true the Republicans had q
one time majority in the Lower House Of our Legs-
laure and at another time in the Senate, but a. each
time the Executive and one branch Of the Legislature
were against them. These arguments were complete
answers to this portion Of Mr.. Hendricks speech. IL
must be admitted by every that heard The dscns-
sion that the canvass il conducted IN genrlemany,
courteous and able manner. The candidates are the
Representaye Of their respective parties, and no
other two men in this State could have been nominated
that would have created more enthusiasm than Cox
Lane and Thomas Hendricks. II is also perePipe 70
every intelligent mind that Of the two Col lane has
much the advantage before audience. lie " an or
ator and humorst unsurpassed this continent, peo-
ples man, man that will kindle blazing lire OF en-
ihusiasm all over the State Of Indiana and revolution
ize the State.