Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1860-11-23

iho gentleman from Rutland clnms that the deDentnres
which are d-hurscd here and are 20 be dspused h he
uvic' ls Too 'r tne comp'h avon noh'pel'! " !" ItF'
Tor hcr money But De should not reckon ths hr s't
with iho gentleman In the House, roomcd with him a. he
hotel and sat beside him a. lhe table, aud be believed
that thn g1 fair equivalent for his disbursements lh-
deed, be- thought hc got do more. lie fclt confident
ilat members got au equivalent for the money they paid
0uf FOO Montpelier.
Uruast called the attention Of the House 90 the cr-
tnes of many of Tho uors1ua who had contributed
,o ,tI uf thr money which hld been advanced Some
vere n vnt. SOME ucrc uoouvcnicucci ly hc Jack NJ
f efhrrs wrre Boz no need oft Uudr these crcUmslu-
GO. ihc dcbt choul De discharged The h proposed io
ray hrv ref cont OF &c. If we cannot ray the whole,
'rtl. certainly pay portion of it This wls right aud
iu-t Tlc state VAS much better able 20 pay it than the
good nc lc us ralv on that's IL 10 was poor one that
. o .s and oar look o,t tho people ought mot ne
upfrailsl flr that IT 70 is uuiest now was 30 in
1882 askrIth gentleman from Rutland TIcclsc was
ro rrssrp.I r 1867 Nopuclor was forced to dG what
She ld Burlington. Rutland. and other towns made
the Lids frstffc House and constrained Mlutnciarro
trau.1 .fIn WAS rou be- always opposed the auction
UuttI. earfloi1n flfa Rutland was dssa. ftd With
the clufU..ts 900 ways and means Hc Iameu''i That
thr opponents of hcmoasurc had no voice iu W report
rfi. ,-,. most r,irate But hc was ready to mako
.5a., aIer'faa he would ho maeuanimors. and if 10
,.Dlf f, fIe EDO r.flirg that existed f 10 would ufo-
,i,., Citation ialJ t8 harmony he would pee
i.t -obi.l held under che fourth Joint rule
N. 1. .,, .sl,. ,r ,,ft tr.,llr Cd fi.i.h rlerrf.
ts.t -f ri. r,o.t ,,,opaurous fclfsacrfcc accom-
fi. it. 1. ir,,se aisno'linq iLc clouds of rather
lt... fa..i tIlt had boon har.He o,crthc House
HIH NH|.r Boo . H| %
r-t.f old. f t. as fusf. IIi this amendment that had
r Tf .l..fc,l ih.t i rla ~ doubtful character
fTo f rI r.fI 10 as inst ifr proceeded 90 examine
f e.,. s fI hr1 ,fi.I. WINS ufyeu f,thret,tr Now
n f.,. ..tl m -iie-a, So ri 81 b. or This bond
Trtat elat ,.. lfo .I4..fer Of the ravtutf if Che
0d e.. r8t fb ..r.frir.r. -io oaua. That lcI fhrm
o., ,,, It ,,-its mo t.rI b,d not hcaf rildIel. fhr
a i,I linen ra.l, made ly Nortnelier What iudabt-
l.... ,. rre fhsr ON ffs mart ~ tho af7tc3 Wasft
1.-.f. WA. 30 roI.t,tla aud r.rht. When tho aucrd-
t ,rr.i i f.f, to.,5 M ,,r,ose if FIR ho WIS in
r4,i f ,,tn.ti. gi oir or NOM, Ho would rcnuiiat,
30 i.-t II- fr was his vi.h o. do what was ii- ANA
oD-t.ff.
Nr gi.f fsf rri.tnr oi1 te had NOT been iufuaur.
cd i, t.s outside influence tho.fatc te divide iu.
20 tl n.-v rrI portions or parties there win be some
fo. % rrrft iba, will do ipd.creet acts and san
fnI tHff. 1Vo an r,r.s, ellis. II 10 wore NOT So the
r.i.tft m would Do faud Ue 1l NOT wish to be in-
u.f.ae D.. .i.h ni1.s Hs attributed ihcin 20 thc pcr-
som s s.t fhe ,a ssi-~ fnv ,vrra advocating or wrr
a..-r ft ,Iarobf tbr would decide ili. o,.e.-
ti1n m u li, f such views: f if ihore bc f,1ls Shall
tho candid and discreet 4u.r fr th.r fiv The House
otirhtt ir H.r 40 such r0u.i4.rtilu- The question
uas nur.r state interest and policy II vHs HYDRA.
headed fhlt arnenfrd in al our local aud stare
rs %. bad haen laid But when thc gentleman from
E.fIr tasdrl th'a be conceded everything; firtncu
70 o.lo4 au 1ufv as LEGISLATORS tn dispose Of h. II is
nur duty dispose of 40 such monsters AVID iu doing
-. . hc lm composed and sidcratc. The more
irf7rt r hc fqaft.r which wr have 20 dea' with the
moro r,ri ,. u.t. f eoal clear htal This wls tuo
ss uiucirI. that $50 oct uuou Hc believed that tho
House Nnai ar' s' n"w lt WAS characteristic of us
we learned 90 FROM our mothers our fathers taught a.
$50 uare Instructed in 10 u throd loe school houses
business .ni experience confirmed 30 How thcu shalt
we dectlcit; lie examined the imrutitiou That haf
nccu cast fh. committee. They were high minded
honest msu: t.fr Judgment was worth more Hnd un
loss thlu flai ~ ufhe iu the House. sarc flr