, 1860-08-01
39rrBg & Triihtttre.


under Tue F'"f''oS''s''P ~ 49,
mic t:q' ~ pe'"'P=' Wv - '"' ''"' a
can "ess o. 'ne p''ssI' 49, 1'N ''' .1''"
reason We 'e'' J1s'~ - e'''s :. 'Ao' "|'eN4'
t'on 70 ''e '''''e4 '4'''., 'a0e. o'0oAs eAsa
"'aose'' ~ .s ~ .'.1 s. Vasa' =
!ee.'' '' ' H., ~
~ ~ @ " ~ a pa 1..,s |
A'as o61' " ,n>A@1 -es-s1 -
s''a'- 1l4 w. a1s - ., ''a' ..r.s Dss fron tho
Wv. Wy Wv t' -, 80 1r,:~ ,,.ar,. ,a..on.1
-, 49, r.,1.0.. 49, z.s-...;aa -
s f' :. ~ ~ 49,. - .,.-san.,,,, ho.+;,o =.
.s. ,..' ,oss. .rdaa,,u aor.toa ~
,,.;. .h.-.n41. .-...,,
49, IT,.
~ "...,.sn.. -,.~..',:p-.,.. ~. '1 - 49,
~ .....,;o. ana II ~. o~;et;nx .,.s. - 49,
:.
n;,. ~ -..~.:..-.-.
es.,,..s.,,.~ -. ~ - ~ -.1.a 49,. -
:. ~. .,:.:-', - 49, 81
~. - ~N...s.n- 11r,,.-
....,,:-
~ ~ e@' ''~ ~ ~0
r.. ru .o..1,..z
-
,,.. nd c.,,, ,1.. ~. - 49, a.. 80. ,-..e
~ xr.C.-,..,. :. -. ..,....1-
a,.,,.d., a.. .a,.....n.,-. x ~. .a,;,;..,
to,t,.,.. T.. oond,,+n,s hnro no,;fa.ted ho,h
,.,,s,,r .aa .,;,,r :. a;e,,,,.n;.n a.. d,,+.
,.,.-.,..-,.::,.
..-~. 80:
~, ~. -.-...., -..c. go. +..;. ,.1.-- 20
1I.,..., =. - -. ,r->D..
..,:-:.- -. n...;dn~.:., ...;-..;1ua ,,:a;.
-a,r, - ~, ~vo,,,a In r,1, ran,;d at1sn,,,,
IT, n,,,a,.. ,>..o,., candidate f,- TIM pr.e.
ta.rcr. ,ha canvass, ia :, ,r,crsss. thu ..v If
.1.e-;o, IL nesr =, h,nd md ,be T,oe. in ,he
eren, of lila f].c.;on 1..nc mat nm ,ha Gro of
4 career OF proijt which would cnricl, it's OVID
ers aud compensate taem f,r their jealous but,
hitherto, not well-paid labor, suddenly passes
into the hard, Of new man, known to be de-
voted to the political fortunes Of Mr.. Douslas'
Democratic compeutor! Whatever the public
may be told Ct riccoocilab'c differences
betycsu the prorrietors Of the Times in re1a-
t:oa TO bnsiress matters, the inference Is ire
rlstib:c, that these differences" whatever
their nature nia- &C. would not hare resulted
in turning lhal journal over TO Nr. Mccormick,
Il ia prop.ietors lad not wholly Gcspaired Of
tbs election Of Mr.. Douglas. Means would
hare been devised 10 CONTINUE it as Douglas
orsaa, aud its editor would have b=en rctalned
in charge and in a po:i.iou to profit br Mr.
ncu,lss' sccess;oa to Office, So far, therefore,
a, The old proDrie.ors OF the Times arc cou.
rcrned the sale cf the paper can only be con.
,,rued into a confession that, in their opinion,
ur Douo1as' changes of IN election are entirely
bo,c1ss. So mich m recards the cause of
+ba s.1c
- .,,o r.. mil 77xr,1
,,- ,r-c.--:-,-r -,,,,,;. n,;,h ,,n;.
..,,,. &C -:~-:c.... 49, .,ou
41' 49,. - 40 ~ N - - ..e.
~ .' D's = 49,. ~ %.e - n-'s ..u,oaaa ~
=, .c1;o
~ ~',. ~ - 49,. II.
-. -. -. ..,;u....n c,r
o'aaae 'o1 'ae 'ate ]I'A''"'1n Az
Navcr Of this ci.v, in March last, and, after
l.. .,,;..a .n+;,o,r IN
o1slns u'' saaef ~ LIZ oo''1'c cN' eA''e'' -
his uwp hAld-, WIS slaughtered by the pecu'
,;.- f,;enaa os non,,as--the Time, being The
ealet Instrument III tais sangn'nafy perform
ancc Mr. Mccormick saya, this circumstance
led hin to purchase the Utrald. We Fave
no donIi tl4at such Is The fact, end the suisse
quent course o. tire Herald coTobosates the
belief. Prior 10 the meeting Of the Charleston
Couyeution, editorial aftcr editorial appeared
in ite colurns guardcdly worded it is true
but none the lcss iutellgible to politlc'ana, th'
obie.t Il which was TO tecu1c the nomination
1T Charleston, Of some other man than Doug
las. After the failure CT that body to max
nomination, the Herald sought to 50 indu
eucs tho action Of lilo Baltimore Convention
to defeat Mr.. Ds::g!as there. 1t did th's b
ad:ocnting the adoption OF the Tennessee rest
luton, WIKI had been offered at Charlesio
by Mr.. Howard o! Tennessee, as comprom's
platform. 1t WIS in these words:
R.so{r.d, That al the citizens of the Unite
States, hare an eq"al f!1n' 1o se;as: ns'n 1us ~
FIX Il S,at~. aad Tint u5d.r The decision {
the supreme Court OF The onneh slates. ~n'e
re,;,.,t;an nf ~ i;n,,s5 ,ts'rn ns;tb.T thr
rigAh Of 7~r.ea Or property caa 1e <dtssrcytd {
smp3@td " es"9'es@'0"&@ o' 1''7So''0S 'eS'''<
''"''
IN n1s 'es'e' - no''' u ouo"q"e' ~
haa asser1eo ''l't n' "oo4o A,S ~>r. ~: ~
tnatlon On snen E'a'o'o, ~ t142. -'4so' 49,
haa !tao 'na' ,e''e. ~ A.1 ,,..,. ~ - ..o.,s 49,
m1iA; se' Ii 'ne ...t'' o4 11s' ~ a:s:,.' s.. ~.
ons' ne as5F' AA's' "
pRom' "e 49, p.,,:-.,a =,
aas u'uslps os4eea'e' - 'N' ''"''''.e ~
enao'' 10 sa' o' . =, b.,
unhappy al'!s'on ~"uA '''e'
olo ne 90 so' Ut: o'o N'.' Ns"''e' Wy .e''
to man Of aE'o1'e E'''sfa'eis ltoea''1"s'
have the Detnoctat'c parry eo1on't'co ~ o'''
terms against tho oooge OF ahi''cnolS lee
latiop," lie could have mad no o1hef mot'
thAn the defeat Of Doue'as~ II ang p7oos
You'd the internal evidence FURNISHED over .
AcCorm'ck's 3 OWL name IN sesserday lssae
his paper, were aeeoeo 10 s'os'aoaaso u
pos's'on' II would oo 'oano Ii Inc 'ast 'o1'
wesk OF more al@1 'ne nomlna1lons'
deTntd was sS!ett ae u as eno'"o oet"s
bFscknsose anu oous'sf' WINE ~ "as una
stood u'a' 'ae q''es'1'n was oe4ns e''nss