New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-08-28

The albany Erening Journal has an article
based on letter from Syracuse, which 1t mis-
takiDgIy attributes to Mr. C. A. Dana, and there
upon flies into a passion with THE TRIBUNE. 1t
sufhces to say in reply, that neither Mr.. Dana
nor any other person connected with the editor
ship Of this paper either wrote, or suggested, or
irstjgated the writing of that letter. Nor do we
think The Journal evinces it's usual sagacity in as
Stunning that said letter was Gained at this jour
NAL" Such conduct as is therein repr0bated is
rot confined, We presume, to The Journal Office.
That there was for time very determined OPP
position to 1t Gov, Cswpbell's nomination we
knows that it was excited by bis inaexible resist
ance to all schemes of public plundar we also
knows but we do not know how The Journal stood
affected toward it, though we know persons en-
gagged in it who arc very intimate in The Journal
Office.
The Journal says it will, if provoked, tell who
odd while protesting to be for Gov. Morgan, ask
prominent Republicans to go for Mr. Greeley. We
do not care to make The Journal less amiable in
temper than it seems to be at present; but we sha
be greatly obliged by its giving the information
thus threatened
The Journal says:
"Aner the Chicago Convention THE TRIBUNE asked for
peace. II was granted"
We are not aware of any facts that warrant
the above. We only asked the public to take no
tice that the warfare had been wsged upon US
wantOnly causelessly, recklessly. They were vel
come to prosecute it to their hearts content. Aud
between open, honest, manly warfare and that
which for time succeeded it, prefer the latter.
But Mr. Weed is mistaken if he suppOses we
have any quarrel with him. We war upon system
which seems to US Incompatible with public well
being and private rectitude. We quote strong
rlfractiOn Of that system from the leading article
of yesterdays Journal.
There has scarcely been session Of the Legislature for
than quarter Of century out of which If had chosen
large amount Of could not have been made
The refusal to do in Ike this Of the Brooklyn
erie has subjected to Misrepresentation and assault We
made active and Influential enemies and greatly dsobged
intimate friends by refusing peritenty for six years
per claim of 900 against the State And this
brte profeed" b. of the highest standing in New
York We have frequently rejected "proaers" of large
amounts Of money TO forego opposition to the
peal Of the Usury Laws. But in denying emphaticay
and challenging and defyng enemies to dlsprove
ntthat obnoxious to the apeons of TAG
TRIBUNE World Express and Herald there have been Les
aye measures right in themselves and promove Of the gem
eral welfare IN which have bad I'm with other c
ultimate prospective INTEREST," In this itegory belong
NewYork City Railroads But the way TO m,ke money,
these questions in opposing them The solid OF New
York have paid large the Lobby" for several
cessiye years defeat the R,road bills We offered
$4,000 in 1889, to oppose City Railroads Indeed could
during the last eight years have been In the receipt of from
$loOOtO $4,000 year for quietly opposing City Railroads.
We arssure Mr.. Weed will, on reflection
agree with that the state of things which compels
him to be perpetualy declining such offers must
cease. And it WILL. That is all.