Wilmington journal. [volume] (Wilmington, N.C.) 1844-1895, 1860-10-11
From the Fayetteville Carolinan
RIIzahethfOXYn. Rladen County.

From the Fayetteville Carolnlan
FslIzabethtovvn, Bladen County.
We have lust returned from Baden county, where we
had the pleasure of hearing the discussion between
Messrs Allen and Dockery. Our Elector Mr.. Allen
was listened to with the deepest interest by all parties
His arguments were unanswerable and many quesuons
propounded by him to Mr. Dockery were never answer
ed-nor do we expect they will be- He was ASKED had ne
any objection to any portion of the platform upon when
MI Breckenridge STOOD to this question he was num-
In HIS REPLY TO Mr.. ALLEN, Mr.. DoCKERY SAID
THAT Mr.. BELL. GAVE VOTE IN HIS ENTIRE 20
L1r1CAL LIFE THAT Mr., DocKERY) DOES NOT HEARTH
LY AND CHEERFULLY ENDORSE.
And again The vote Of D Ohm Bell upon the receP-
ton of abolition petitions, vote for the sacred
right of petition for the redress Of grievances Mr..
D0ckery stated that the Democratic party was now u
able to save the country, that 1t was divided de SAID
Black Repubcanism by the sectlonallsm OF the
Democratic party spoke of its strength in 1910, and
Immediately stated that the Democrats had aLcGy met
and resisted this organization lie said that Gov
Ellis had denounced Yancey and his compatrlots but
was whipped into the ii, here was programme
entered into by Yancey Co., to break up the Unlon,
and it by nominating three candidates for the res
idency. The Democrats are not IN earnest about
this protection The Kansas Nebraska bill and the
Cincinnati platform both in favor OF Squatter
Sovereignty and they always have by these meas
ures He said that Breckenridge himself prince
of Squatter Sovereignty and had made speeches for 1t
in 1856, when candidate for Vice President. He
said that Bell was in favor of Congressional protection
ten years ago. He said that the Raleigh Standard had
denounced the Breckenridge ticket-and quoted the
Standard he also said that he (Mr. Holden, was In
favor of Mr. Douglas till he whipped into the traces
Mr. Uockery also admitted that Mr. Breckinridges
record was perfectly clean, and that he could not If he
would say aught against him.
These we believe were the principal points OF MIR.
Dockerys speech
Mr. lien showed that the Democratic party had
never endorsed Squatter Sovereignty that it was
not in the Cincinnati Platform, nor had Mr. Breckin'
ridge ever expressed himself in favor OF it. Commented
upon the difference between the bearers the people OF
a Territory" and Mr. Douglas term the Territorial
Governments" NOn-nterventiOn never the Demo
cratic doctrine-sad Mr.. Cookery and his party were
as responsible for Horace Greeys sentiments were
the Democratic party for MIR. Yanceys, were Mr.
Us. bad MIR. ID. had represented them to be. He
did not feel called on to vindcate MIR. Yancey, though
he saw nothing in Mr.. Yanceys present position sui
GENTLY obnoxious to justify the abuse that was heaped
upon him.
Greedy had endorsed and recommended Bell,
| Read an extract from the Raleigh Standard stating
that the people had demanded him hoist the names OF
Breckenridge and Lane and commended 1T to the especial
attention of Mr. d. since the Standard had become
great favorite of his. Hoped he would profit by TAX
ing the Standard guide and vote for Breckenridge
and Lane. He has no dlSunlOnl3t;-nOr did his party
attempt any position in antagonism to the Union. On
the contrary the Democratic party now supporting
Breckenridge and Lane was the only party the country
occupying truly Constitutional, Union position, and
the only conservative party capable of preserving its
integrity and perpetuating it,
| BELL WORTHY OF PLACE IN LINCoLN's CABINET.
Hon. Tbaddeus Stevens, of Pennsylvania, made a
speech few evenings since to a Black Republican
meeting in New York. from which we take the follow,
ing extract. We commend it to the Beileverites OF
Wilmington. 1t will be seen, among Other things equal
ly choice that Stevens endorses both Bell and Bolts
good enough Republicans to be appointed to Lncon's
Cabinet to please any abolitionist however fasd-
ious
With regard to Bell and Everett he had little to say
Ia Only thing they differed from the Republicans.
In hostility to modern democracy they cordially agreed
Hence continued Mr. Stevens, it astonshes me to see
his friends in the free States directing their hostility
against the Republicans, and coaescng with Demo-
Gratis. No is mad enough to suppose that Bell can
be elected by the people House of Representatives
If by possibility they could give free State to Doug
las Breckenridge, it would only send the election to
Congress- where Joe Lane the most unfit of the whole
lot, would be made President. What would the friends
of Bell gain thereby? The of both parties-the
favor of none. How different would it be if Lincoln
were elected. His administration cannot be sectional
one, for that would violate the principles of Republican,
ism. He must select portion of his cabinet and many
of his oiceholders from the South Where shall be 20
Tor them but among the Southern Opposition Nc
where could he find safer or truer What Repub
can would object to such men as Bell or Etheridge
Bolts, Bates, Rayner, or Fl. Winter Davis? The pro-
ectve system has ADLER men than the South
ern Bell men,
SENTENCE OF THE OFFICERS OF THE SLAYER ORION
boston, Oct. 5-Ihe officers of the slave bark Oror
sentenced to-day. Captain Morgan to pay fine
of $4,000 and to be imprisoned two years Byron