Dayton daily empire. [volume] (Dayton [Ohio]) 1850-1865, 1860-07-25

DETER sOHNEPP, pltf against Leonard selmepp,
Peter snyder and Elizabeth Snyder his wife, all OF
Montgomery county, State of Ohio Jacob Schnepp and
Philip Schnepp, OF nppecanoe county State of Ind.
ana Isaac Bender and Mary Ann Bender, his wife, Of
Fountain county, State Of Indiana Nathan Bender and
Catharine Bender, his wife Of lntiana John Schnepp
Of Cedar county, state Of Iowa. John Il. Chapman and
Hannah Chapman, his wife, John n. Miller and sally
Ann Miller, his wife, Harmon Martin aud Mary H. Mar
tin wife, Margaret NJ. Sohncpp, minor, Louisa Ann
schnepp, minor and VIM. u. schnopp, all OF Carroll
county State Of Indiana In the Superior Court Of Mont
gomery county, Partition.
The defendants above named will take notice that on
the 2Id day OF June 1850 the plaintiffs above mentioned
iled petition In tho Superior Court of Montgomery
county, State OF Ohio where the same now pending
demanding partition Of the lands and enements here.
In after described, situate ia said county.
The plaintiffs demand partition follows. One undi-
yided ninth part (9tl) In fee to Catherine BENDER Philip
Schncpp, jacob schnepp, Johu Schnepp, Leonard
sohnepp, Elizabeth snyder Peter schnepp and MARY
Ann Bender, each; the rcnaning ninth Part IN fee 10
Hannah Chapman sally Ann Miller, Mary Il. Martin,
VIM, u. Schnepp Louisa Ann Schnepp aud Margaret
sshnepp, together, they heng the heirs Of William
schnepp, deceased OF being tho one sixth Of ninth
in fee to each,
The following il description of the property; lst
tractA that trnc OF land contained within the fol-
lowing bounds beginning the south east corner ofthe
~ range seven ~ between the great and little Miami
rivers, and running from thence north one degree wes
with its eastern boundary hundred and rixty ont
and a half perrhes (l6ilSl 10 its north east corner
thence south eighty nine degrees west any nine anc
iory one hundredth perches (59 4l-l0Oi TO post
thence south one degree east hundred and sat,
one and hHlf perches uol5s) to post thence nortt
eighty illfc cfrht- and
hnndredths 90 fllOOl 10 the place Of beginning con
mnng sixty lie the same less situate anc
lying the county Of Montgomery aud State Of Ohio
| 2ttru Beginning at tho north east corner Of Dan
el schnepp's sixty ncrc tract IN the south quartet
Of section eleven i ia township one l N range SIX (G
between the great and little Miami rivers and runnini
thence north tourtecn chains seventy one links "a, n
u post Witnessed by red elm eighteen inches in diam
ter hsarng north twenty three deg thirteen link
distant, another ned elm twenty inchos IN diameter
bearing south eighty degrees west twenty one links ds
tant thence south eighty nine degrees forty seven min
ues west trty CHAINS eighty one links go, 81 20 pos
on the western boundary OF said section from which
hickory fourteen inches n diameter hears north eight
two degrees, east eight links distant sugar tree twelV
inches in diameter bears south nine degrees east Ala
teen links Distant thence south with the western boun
diary of said section fourteen chains seventy one link
Ni, 10 % a post the north west corner Of DAME
Schnepps sixty tract aforesaid; thence east fort
chains eighty one links i0 SO 10 the place uf hen
ming, containing sixty aures more OF less ing in Mont
gonery county. Sate Of Ohio, xcept tVo acres oui
The South west corner nov owned hy Peter snyder an
formerly decided 20 him by Philip sehnepp ancestor
The defendants aforesaid will take nOtioe that al ih
next term Of the superior Court 0f Montgomery com
u aforesaid, the plaintiff viii ask for order maxim
lartif0h Of the aflresa premises In the proportion
before stated and according 70 law .t
JOHN A. M'AIAHOS,
lee6N6 Attorney for plaiRtn