The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-05-09
xE5neDnf GENERAL ouWyRM3.
FIFTH DAYS PROCEEDINGS.


0aUpr ~ nBMDWs OF TEE oHUacH-Excrrisd
= rnDASB ON THE QUESTION or EsrABLIsaisG A
seuRs - AYYnALs, ETC.
T BUFFALO, May s., 1850
nn1ng TIE religious exercises were lei by d., rrlnble
= eide
a DuMxr nsysa hat Tie Rev. 7 Mitchell, OF East
NJ sssensd tslsgrAphc despatch announcing that M
h>hsr vas dyhg. ne molten was adopted.
No sncsxlARs proceeded to read the minutes Of the
pssvisss sssscn which we're very volunnous and ocSu
~ Asss IN rsadsg As tho routine business
Opssea a. ne time OF the Conference win not be taken
- - nh wy.
Rsv. .CAius KnGsxy moved that such portions Of the
jsmnAh q De annual conferences relate 10 specific
Ajssss be referred standing committees
wAssA Was adopted.
Rev. Mr. NnsoS, Of Wyoming, offered similar reso
sksS areensg that all petitions presented by The dele
Uass - ychrea 10 the committees having the mAte
ssaasd Of n sharge, which was Lost.
- sns gentleman then moved that Mr.. Kingsley
psshunn seyecsnsdered which cansed considerable dc
psss. Eveaisay Mr.. Kingsley withdrew his u,oicn OBJ
sssvhg has me object he had in Offering Was 10 save
nse sss 81 The delegates inclined 70 discuss he
na1sr lus waste time, he moved that his resolution
- Md spsa TIE table.
Ma regua, order Of business WAS then tazen ep ana
- aeJssAss Of the respective conferences cub niteo
..sriA, pstitons, appeals, and other papers, all OF
whssh we're referred 10 committees
A ,etslss vas offered by delegate, asking 10 be re-
sss su debt OF s23 for books, he having lost all his
ssssy he vas crossing stream on DIS way 70 'ne
Qunsra ossfesnce.
A .eDoralws presented from tae Quarterly COME
,snss Of Marlborough hass asking the General Conie-
psroe 70 rts,oraH Wesieys old rule which IN me FORA
e iAs q.esusr -Queshon-Do you nke snun, og $500 "
Al unusually Arge number Of petitions were presented
m msrnirr isyor Of lay delegation and OF change Oh
- ras On ssyery o nSrs sssSsp change Of rule
Rrre vas one petition rom North Indiana In favor or
change OF rue, which was signed oy "a pereonf
Rev Mr. EIiI, OK Erie, moved tnat the case 81 AVh
vnsst VIE appealed from the North Ohio Conference,
- referred 70 . committee Of fifteen
Rev Cows Of Is., Sn sro, m sas assg.Ss In
Ss6r So be SAID there might be appeals In which osnop
would be implicated. Whether bishop could De tenp.ec
vAe Or ns BE- would be charged with il; and be desfed
. save the bshope from any charges or tney new n
Uave doctors Of divinity who mad oeen AosSssMsa ~,
- hst twenty years 70 sit ~ delegates ns poo! naa
sAArge6 m the public prints thai he psao2s eAsr-
- IN unaoe influence and control over the
ns sssy he vas no enc .0y, s ar ,hss md He
hcnoyed hem TOO much and respected uen 700 ngny
sxpsse Aen such charges as those ana men let tne
saoys ro 70 he rocetes and churches with this appeal
: rend and tear The societies oy saying tpst
- Conference was controlled ms way 10
ss.sye any cieiy q mas ZINC, Hne NO.. fen ,Sas
- 6ensral Conference would appoint Court Oh
AVpsah By delegations in every case; The annual con
1900 .spo1ssa Ssmmse sSsirna a and he the
saker thought thai the Court OF Appeals should not %
ssssttuisd BY the men who presided IN the former uN
1T vas liable 70 be the case be happened 70 be IN me
sAAs vheA he appeal came up. There was manifest
sVrsrNsy and the liability Of exposure from her enc
nbn hey AID the work Of trying sppeAA upon Ine
bhhsp &c hoped they would relieve ther mperinten-
asnsirpu all these liabilities 70 be improperly charged
sse from each delegation was TOO large court be sng
ssss< that two consecutive conferences unite IN me dee
q NE Court n Appeals BY thai means The whole church
sss,a represented fairly, honoraby and ntshgenty,
- ~ appeals tried In such manner that oil parties
sssss se sstisaes he Qhe speaker) knew that where
nsre parties and sres In the church and confer
sssss equally balanoei, and bare majority expelled
unsty vsuld 10 70 our churches With flaming
pepssm nd charges Of corruption 10 save the church,
= Eve We credit ofhe oshols and Of the General Con,
~ lsssinsnons from the delegates Of The several annual
- esopvn, Of East Genesee, had 70 hear Of the first
shasxeG corruption or impaAnon Of any kind made
so4si he Bench Of Bshops He moved tina, the resou.
Br YorSc, Of Cincinnati would argue nom An analysis
e Ne psswssons OF The Discipline that the General Con-
rssss essn. 70 fsrnsh the Appeal Committee in The
snas var that such committees were appointed by the
snasa Conferences and let the bshop preside over ~
M snAvrR. Of delaware, moved that the General CON.
Ne jury shouid be composed Of Twelve. delegate sug
Gssea that The discipline required the committee 70 be
ssspssed Of ffsesn members
h&bep sEGsoS said that himself and colleagues would
- revived very much II the Conference wouli take his
whsle matter into their own bands They (tne bshops
suppressed an0De themselves he opinion TIA, all Appeah
1xkt 10 be brought before standing court appointed By
~ Conference " which tho whole OF them coaid Be 70
buss- II such court were estAbahed in members
you'd become familiar with oil the rules Of order, thus
sss'sme Tie necsssiy Of appointing new committee 70
Dr Gu, Of New York, though, the Conference wm
- tusgss,ed that when established should con-
M o twenty Eve members, 70 be nomnsted BY he Com
M nnorT Of Ia, Baltimore was q opinion ina, tners
wsrs sssesions against The motion. He vas opposed Y
- erection 81 such court
Dr Hhyrs spoke IN Avoy Of the motion. He was o
- spn,en NAT tho blshops snouh appoint the com
assses would be found hat unjust suspicons wouls
- awakened in the community, and The enemies Of Tn
Subsequent General Conference should pursue anothe
spuse-nAi d, appoint . committee 70 the General coa
- Fpsosps1y s 'S sSs y, Ne vsry sssS.ins x "a
nsu spssaspa IN Inc Methodist economy, thsy aasome
ssspsne hs courus no rcprcacn would snrosn upo
~ pArs q snsr sovernnsni, for all things would 90
~ ros o. Cincinnati said that The counsel for the
pelAns, The particular prcscnied This morning "
unss 10 have The committee app ,ined In the regul
sSs.r we're Wiling ,ha The p.snops should appos, a
eRuntse, be hoped the Coefsrcnce would permit he
- - %, IN order thai The trial might proceed wiihos
fnrsA<r delay.
cAIvr kSeHzr moved 70 lay al the smsndmsns
- srxma resosnson The table, which vss adopsed
y RIM said that . vote IN favor n This rcsoit
would be cong much 10 sssaonsh BY necessity YER
aasgsrsus precedent
Rlsnop srrsox asked the brusoer who presented N
spP>sl Withdraw r. IN order that the Conference msf
A1sys Inc poacy which would govern tncn In Inc foaI
- gynf aprsah
ss~Sd, eas the appellant sS under expense, he VI
Bxous 70 have the TRIAL proceed immediately.
nr ruIlR opposed 70 ths estAoshment al . ee ~
M Court 81 Appoals for changes woah occur IN ever
80, vhscn would consume more time tnsn she Appon
rn<nt Of committees 10 each case
A prrakrN moved ths, The Committee on Epscops:
sypelnt committee 70 try appeal cNsea
M. Corr, Of Maine, believed hat the Dnslrlne
asw 70 establ~h q Court Of Appsas rom me deegaie
90 be propcs>d, mat whea . Court OF Appeals y
u.>sasd, n anal pe composed Of one member o. eae
ssesanos, except the delewAucn frcm which the Ape
sass, hai The appellant have the right 10 cnaneri
ssy msnber. He Acushi that In hs way an inparsa
b.. H.ss,s moved ,hs. The Committee On Tpscop.,
psnnsss conmniee 90 ne SPECIAL case no~ eefo'
0~u.
M Nxnso~ Of wyonrr moved thst The arr~al ca