The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-11-20


asked me call psxt day aid not call, because sne
came told not that there would DO trouble
sr r, .a Sa' ss next
father that Afternoon could mot Co. was % busy; her
father went Away that afternoon % did not ny 70 see
got letter from her nom New YORK in the Following
February In October her In Boston, thai
letter wss ost by being washed In thin ooa. and tho
girl threw Is In the Ore got another letter nom her
say In her nrat Ieiterf tObjeotsd 10Y
money in order 10 return him Boston, and that The
witness sent her $40, that she wrote for more saving
that she went BY the name OF ssSes sArgeAnt
residing Ia York street. Rrooklyn and thai the witness
sent her $40 more by express.
The Judge did not think ecessary 70 20 into the de-
tails Of the contents Of these letters unless the deencs
should attempt to show that they living on ami
cable terms.
witne.s-I sent her $40 arss, directed TO x, Isabella
sergeant SO York street. Brooyn TO her in that
name 10 consequence Of what heard from her did not
think there anything improper Ia going by that
(prodnced) Is in my wfes handwriting the recep, OF
the $40; do not know the sgpsture 70 the $40: saw
my wife IN two or three days after seat her the So
went and furnished nice comfortable for her Ia
Boston, forget the street; then engaged In y
tauTsnt, with Mr. Hussey; my wife with
two or three weeks; difficulty TRANSFERRED she intro
duced the subject OF separation abe she thought
best that We should live apaItfor her 70 take care OF
oefsen and me TO take csre Of myself objected 10 Il
1t frat ! there use, and !
sented; she raid she had friend in New York who
would get her good comfortable situation, that she
~
che said that alter living separate for Two three
years and had saved something could together
again she said he thong hi not able 70 support her
che ought ~ be; then went 70 Mr. Payne wyer,
and had tho articles OF separation drawn up she in
her nineteenth year az the time, she came 70 New
YORK; a.d not furnish her with nouey to on
remained with the night after articles OF eepsrs-
ton were drawn up; che went away next day; l next
saw her 10 December, 1885, at her brothers house In
Boston; asked her II she was willing 70 come and Ii ye
with me again. she said she WAS and brought the deed
o. separation ap aud her brother put hers aud
Sle mt Ifvev affa
destroyed she remained week her brother Johns;
! faw her two or three times in the street; u was
the next night after they were destrSyei
che said she would no, live with me;
next saw her last spring she had child with her when
she came on to New York; never reproached my wife,
nor bad any occasion 10 do so
Letter OF Mrs. Brown TO her husband offered In evil
dence 10 show the a1ecti % between them.
Mr. Girard objected to It's ad mission until the defence
attacked that psrtic liar point OF tho care
The Court he'd that th. letter Admssi for the
purpose OF proving that fact
The letter. dated Oct Q, 1857, was then read II was
deAire to meet her husband che describes herself
giddy n.y. away GIRL though she married, and all the
sleep sne desires her Husband 70 M bs ass hs Sd 20,
win not like her half well they think. but that she
would hug the Dig babies as well ~ the little Ones
Cross examined-Has been engaged in q resta arant
with Mr. Worden In this city for -four months oil on
have been in a number of places; / have not been in
business in this city since May Last, except at the
restaurant In the Bowery; have stopped 1t the
xas Introduced 70 my VIE by her brother john Val
pey; think was moro than month after we we're
married that left for Iowa. there between three
was away paid my we's board In full in Monroe place
before vent away; don't think left her any money
Did 700 arrange anything for her 70 earn Der liveli
earn anything she did not say anything my not
sending her money while was away; l made $50 q
month while 10 Iowa did not give any portion
my wife gave her money several times we were
married besides the money sent BY express gave her
- on OCCASION that's ali recoect cAn't say no
much money gave her for clothes and hoard snce we
were married gave her occasion $25 for clio hes
have given her 50 and $40 II time during the first six
eight months altogether part Of 81 and three or four
weeks In So gave her 50 during ths< time It was 10
not give Der any mopey New York q. the time
VIC separated; CONSENTED 70 her coming New YORK
I'D not ssk her she had any money, did
: hethsr she had ANY or not y You say she told |
Sou abe bad friend in New York; did you ask !
her whether Il WIS lady or . gentleman |
She told me II was gentleman; did not ssx ner VINO
10 wss ask ed her where sne got acquainted him:
she SAL NJ 80 York street. Brooklyn; In spring 1855
tell Der wha, sne ought 70 do for y,ps ala .os ss,
her that che ought " wash for living my brot
wife did; did not attempt 70 take any hing from her;
did not use any violence her; did say aoy ooe
that the separation was Gxed aud unchangsable mink
II was some one In Mr.. psynes Office VII. drew the ar
lces OF PREPARATION, did not say him or Mr. Payae
that the separation fixed and Interchangeable; when
came back from Iowa asked my wife 10 live With me
the tu snc ~OGu see about u ene dd LOt Complain that
nsa len Der with ten cents the sAid she did think
best for US u keeping house then 1865
time we lived together and Sife; did not live
together and wife after returned from Iowa uutl
February, 1865 she refused b tive with me suppose
hr. Mallory, who married my wifes sister, 10 10 Cal
ornis my wife did not complain TO me that ste
had been len to The charity Of her sister she aid
Dot give any reason for refusing to live with me-
he said she did not wish % do %; told her was ua.
reasonable In her. she said che wthed TO out 10 the
sort TO make out for herself thAl she wished live
rge life for Two three Years. consulted to IL;
NOW william Elliott; known him little year
nd he frat suggest 10 you 70 this action
)eiectcd TO |
The court adjourned for The day Decision on the OBJ
y ZION reeerved
Tn.e number Of laeies 10 court throughout the
az vs 10 be witnesses in the case but the lady
rho ia tn subject q The action not present Tue
sfen liant IN porty looking gentleman, about 40 years
age aud wAs ssted BY his counsel up 70 ,he adjourn.
cent OF the ocart