The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1860-03-12

great number Of other articles coming from France from
any duties 81 ALL Surely, the right honorable gentleman
must be aware that has been the custom Tor great
number Of years. after duty has been reduced or re.
pealed, to give immediate effect to the change would
officially announced and for period Of three or four
MONTHS acted the right honorable gentleman now
nss: upon Ws s should have such revival q ,sren
gentleman Whilst would have admitted French wines
At B. gallon, we should be charging g. lod. gallon
admitting brandy At DUTY Of 7s Cd per gallon should
be levellng . 'ax Of lSs upon Hollands, &c. Under
gentlemen opposite might msgne the golden sse 70 havs
come back again 70 US. Il was dc6ghted 70
hear the right honorable gentleman for ihe first
trade was q good principle; but I was sorry that
this should have been his frst essay IN the mode Of
up the treaty and the Sudeet NAV b. given 10 two sea
tep1s We consider that oil exclusive Legislation js
tIely out OF Question and hs. one Of the principles We
want TO zee tested by the vote Of tonght ma second
reason having reference exclusively 70 the pubc
convenience What would have been your opinian Of
Of GOO, and surrender Of revenue about s Co.,
000 but ntimated the time that could not tell
the right honorable gentleman been minister At that time
and had he made this treaty with France the force OF
S s o. re-
ing down TO the House OF Commons TO ask to commit
Itself valy In regard 70 the revenue Of the year. and At
the time With holding any Information his gene
raj financial Arrangements clear hear) He asks ~ to
commit error Of the grosest kind, and one II wo
would have corrected by expressing In the most un
cqsvocs terms s sense ss 10 the folly Of proceed
mgs. Hear. bear1
Mr.. BasGIr thought that from the very earnest and
animated manner 10 which the honorable and harmed
gentleman bad addressed the House. Q stranger might
imagine that there was great question before II 10
auen) but AFTER listening TO the entire debate he was
eorely perplexed to know what they discussing.
Inc honorable membeT for Buckmshsmshre assured
tnem that was not party que stioD and be I'D add
any TO the aatemsnt whom he told them
he had consulted no but the harmed member for
Belfaet, who, after ALL mot . bad soldier when his
eide were wasDg party warfare He could mot nnd out
rom the right honorable gentemans resolution, any
more than from h speech what W. hs object because
be was perfectly sased Inst neither The one nor the
other cid he divuge The real object and purpose OF his
motion In the speech OF The hcaorable member for
North Warwickshire there was something real In IL
be dug theories that they thought had been dead
and buried, never more TO appear among shem He
old not blamc him for the course he he'd taken and
did not understand the point Of view from which
be eaw these questions; but he denounced the whole
thing did not believe 10 the treaty or lie principles And
ike man stood mp against Them however, extxaysgaut
and erroneous, supporting the motion the hope that Il
would get rid OF the obnoxious treaty he tee on ne
oth0 side Of hs House-and an uncomfortable
cNe-inaaod Of cdrpdng al the Budget and ne treaty in pri
r0fe, on making vicious stdtr at in ne Hosse ,pould
fairly drco dt he thought Tie treaty mistaJe tAat Me
Queen Ind been badly ddtsed in ertiso into a. at ~
Government p1e 70 Be condemne tor H. and Aot Pcraosu
ought not 10 adopt T. (Hear, hear.) That would Be an