Dayton daily empire. [volume] (Dayton [Ohio]) 1850-1865, 1860-07-02

DETER sCHNEPP, plth; against Leonard schnepp,
II Peter Snyder and Elizabeth Snyder, his wife, all Of
Montgomery county, State of Ohio Jacob Schnepp and
Philip Sclmepp, OF Tippecanoe county, State Of Ind.
ana; Isaac Bender and Mary Ann Bender, his wife, OF
Fountain county, State Of Indiana; Nathan Bender and
Catherine Bender, his wife of Indiana; John schnepp,
of Cedar county, state OF Iowa; John b. Chapman and
Hannah Chapman, his wife, John n. Miller and sally
tin, wife, Margaret NJ. Schnepp, minor, Louisa Ann
schnepp, minor, and VIM. d. Schnepp, all Of Carroll
county, State oflndinna. Ia the Superior Court Of Mont
gomeTy county. Partition.
The defendants above named will take notice that on
the Esd dayof June lSGO,th plaintiffs above mentioned,
filed a petition in the Superior Court Of Montgomery
county, State of Ohio, where the same h now pending,
demanding partition Of the lands and tenements here
in after described, situate in said county.
The plaintiffs demand partition as follows; One undi.
yided ninth part (0th) In fee TO Catherine Bender, Philip
Schnepp, Elizabeth Snyder, Peter schnepP and Mary
Ann Bender, eachi the remaining ninth part in fee To
VIM. D. schhepp, Louisa Ann Eshnepp, and Margaret
NJ. Schnepp, together, they being the heirs Of William
Schnepp, Deceased, or being the one sixth Of one ninth
The following IL a description of the property: LIST
tIact-'.All that tract Of land contained within the fol.
lowing bounds, beginning at the south east corner ofthe
north east quarter Of section seven (7D In township one
10 Of range seven az between the great and little Miami
rivers, and running from thence north one degree west
with lis eastern boundary one hundred and sixty one
and a half perches QGllO 10 lis north east corner.
thence south eighty nine degrees west fry nine and
forty one hundredth perches 900 4l-lOO) 10 n post
4 thence south one degree east one hundred and sixty
one and a half perches u6l1E) to a post; thence north
el0nty -line utktttHe tASt ht9 ine IrI'ilrH uuu lofty one
hnndreiths go 4l-lOO) 10 the place Of beginning, con.
tanning sixty acres lie the same more or less. situate and
lying IN the county of Montgomery aud State OF Ohio. ~
beginning at the north east corner Of Dan.
lei Schnepp'r sixty acre tract In the south west quarter
Of section eleven IN in township one Q) in range six (g
between the great and little Miami rivers, and running
thence north fourteen chains seventy one links a., III
10 a post Witnessed by a red elm eighteen inches IN diam.
ter bearing north twenty three deg. west thirteen links
distant, another red elm twenty inches In diameter,
bearing south eighty degrees west twenty one links dis.
tant; thence south eighty nine degrees forty seven min
ntes, west forty CHAINS eighty one links go, 8D TO a post
on the western boundary Of said section from which q
hickory fourteen inches IN diameter hears north eighty
two degrees, east eight links distant a sugar tree twelve
inches Ia diameter bears south nine degrees east six.
teen links distant; thence south with the western boun.
Diary Of said section fourteen chains seventy one link,
al, ~ TO "A post theH north west corner OF Daniel
Schnepp's sixty acre tract aforesaid; thence east forty
chains eighty one links 90, 81 10 the place Of hegin
ming, containing sixty acres more or l~eSsIying IN Mont
Romery county, State Of Ohio, except two auTes out q
the South west corner now owned hy Peter Snyder, apC
formerly decided TO himb by Philip Sfhnepp, aDcostOr.
The defendants aforesaid will take n0ltre that nj the
next term of ihe superior Court " Montgomery coun
~ aforesaid, the plaintiff will ask for an order. making
ia rthion Of the Aforesaid premises in tho proportion,
before stated and according to law.
JOHN A. MMAHON,
ie2lw6 Attorney for Plaintiff