The New York herald., 1860-09-21

In q Communication published In your paper Of this
day. the "Gurney letter. Is again charged with being
forgery the charge being based this time alleged
statement OF Mrs Gurney which is entirely comprised in
the three following brief and unsatisfactory lines:
know nothing whatever OF the letter to which you
allude ana hope you viii lei the world know il 1t once
1t is scandalous Of those who have written 1t.
II does appear BY this act that she aludes to
the letter question: but, admitting this point, feel
nevertheless myself and the world 10 declare my
nym conviction that the "Apology enanaed directly or
indirectly, from Mrs. Mary Gurney.
The public must bear In mind that she Is In very DIFF
ferent position from that occupied last January tbs
date Of her letter. She then living In Paris In the
rrs uah Of her newly discovered happincss which she
NO doubt believed would DO perpetual There II, how
ever recent authentic intelligence has since that
time ascertained the impsrcctness Of her afanty
separated from him, and k actually negotiating for
permission 70 return home II may, them be inferred
with great deal Of certainty that tho publication Of her
letter such crisis this mot with her sanction
and that without the parties, who might be able 70 g.
..blish u: suhssci.y by single wosa are Sns,ns u
at least II not greater, regret TO acknowledge, must
have bcen committed somewhsrc Mr.: Quincy, faly
doctrines she has ahined By her own course, and
which, acknowledged, would be fatal 70 her present
nos require extraordinary perception 70 comprehend that
other mcmbcrs Of her family supported by her de
nA might, while informed d tho rutn feiRu ignorance,
and even a. ss pps.snSe o. her .r ,s,s =
of any Of the amys connections n this country bcisv-
ing rather thai their ignorance 10 real
Had the "Apoogy" been Published at the date II bears
have the least doubt that would have been freely
acknowledged by Mrs Gurney; but tho whole state Of
the case 10 90 changed by u appearance s this time, In
the present way asd In the actual state Of her feelings
that shacow OF doubt must necessarily now attach
70 II, at least In unrefcctDg minds.
In regard 70 ts "dcnuncation forgery before its
publication, grant that there was such, but was mrc
denunciation, for II accompanied BY such nnumera
Bile confessions Of fa and papeble occular proofs Of the
letters geruinencss that my faith In u was only con
nrmed.
Without desiring 10 desrac. from the scxs distinction
for "rcady intuition" must deny that Lady Buxton has
this sustained tnat reputation IN suspccsns
to be money making trick OF tho publlshcrs,n FOR the
book ID sold barely above s cost, - those who have
seen is typography and style win easily crefit
II the Authenticity Of this formidable letter 70 be denied
In the brief terms have above quoted without any
her circle e The letter 10 tesnlne With dates names
facts and incideats 70 which She In her
nderce could alone have been privy but no suggestion
offered 10 explain how forecr could have obtained pos
session Of thcm for let t be borne In mind that there
q Genial OF their truth.
Persuaded therefore, have always bean, and still
an. both from internal and external evidence OF It's
genulneness call the family 70 dcuy any a0t al
legged In said letter the existence OF any feeling hcrc
expressed which 10 at variance with any circumstance
autograph ask tha the Of that lady be made pub
c who has been although IN IN inferior social position,
her tried friend and who has the ability, which they
deny Mrs Gurncy 70 have written t ard tue name OF
the lady 20 whom at least inplic6ly addressed,
who, have reason 70 warrant me IN believing, IL now In
this country. am, r,r, your obedi~ns servant,
PunApnrnA, sept 20, 1880.