New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-02-01

forth such bloody fruit rs the raid Of John Brown
that there are men who feel justified In attacking US by
any mesDs III their power, 10 matter wbatl know
gentlemen have arisen here and dsclaimed oil sym
Iathy with euch ucursions, and do not to i'm
Eesch their sincerity, but 1t is to be remarked
that in none of the States where the Re-
puhEcsn parry have the power have the
Governors or Legislatures furnished any to pre-.
vent the recurrence of such attacks and 1t Is also to
be remembered that they chose their candidate for
Speaker man who iudorsed the book which recon-
uepded The very principles which John Brown prac-
ced L. straI re that he who carries aud crculates
this hook should be followed by others who bear
Shsrp's ries to practice what he inculcaies ? For
What purpose IL this warfare waged what can be the
object but 20 abolish Slavery in the States where it
iststO make Slavery odious 30 dangerous that the
white people Of the South will have to emancipate
their sleves If this party had the power
to morrow, they would not dare do it.
would decay. Ships would rot the stocks when the
great aplts Of the South no longer produced
Our manufactures would stop, and how many looms
would be idle, and how many of their own people be
forced to sarve it would not be three months before
their people would drive the slaves into the sea-
if there other way to get rid OF them And do
they not brow this warfare can't be kept up without
severng the Union Is not this virtually an offer TO
the Southern States to secede Suppose France now
the ally of Ebg gland, should send her emssaries with
such arguments this Helper Book TO the East Indies
il oroeI produce war aud instruction, and suppose
the Government should in everv communication to En
and the subject taunt and insult her with tales OF
the cruelty they had prsctced or cODnived at. how
long would the entente cordiaie last and how long
would II be before either shore would resound with
the Toar Of cannon How can this be kept up here
without separation the part of the South? know
it bias been said the South could not dissolve the Unon
they would be whipped into submiss ion. THIS would
be provoking were II not so absurd We number
thirteen millions Of people, and large extent OF the
most magnificent territory on which the sun ever
shone; aud is IT possible such people be reduced
10 submission? Who does not know that we could
hell Of
the old world Suppose the South should be subdued,
this patty coulo not manumit the slaves. | have
shown they could not do this and to rule the prov
inces, SUCH would produce change in the COnsti-
tuition erd the Government, and the Gov
erUment would be paralyzed But l am
told the institution is a SIM Has not all experience
shown that when the black and white races
thrown together, aid the relation of master and
slave established socety is developed into higher
civil zaiioO and the social and political state is the
best for the happiness Of both races And if you de-
strOy that relation, both decline and industry
decays. BY what right does any man undertake to
say that political institution which be shown TO
be the Dormal condition of society, which existed
as long ego have any human history, is wrong
There il rot respectable State in the world that has
not praciiced upon it, and no nation known TO his
tory that has not built up its foundations
this system Of Slavery. All the European nations
have bD up their prosperity upon II, and we, our
selves early settlements, and the wonderful
extension of this country, to Slavery which
il we had not used this forced labor, probably we
should not have settled the country fast enough to
maintain the Revolutionary struggle, and if we had
failed then, how much of our subsequent history
would have been uutO'd On this continent the Indi-
ans, who bad not Slavery, were mere n0mads, while
il the of the Ate and Peruvans, who did estab
hsh Slavery, Z cir monuments remain to excite adml-
ration to this dsy IT, the States south of our bounda
ry all who abolished Slavery deeriOrated. In the
~ history OF society Slsvery seemed to be necessary,
for the moral impulee to labor was not sufficiently
strong and force had to be used. In the history OF all
civilized people, when the equal, in process
Of time the held to service will assert their equal
ity and obtain emancipation without any CONFUSION
to society-to government If this black race be
equal to the white race, II will vindicate
It's equality by lie Improvement The bappest relation
TO he established between the two races is
that of master and slave; we ask by what
authortty this institution, which all nations have
now to be thrown aside We are told it is contrary
to the great abstract principles of right, and TO the
maxim, "Do you would he done by acknowl-
edge the truth of this maxim, and properly inter
preted il. Ii VII dictates, by Us wisdom It's Divine
origin If | should DO as | would be done by, in the
case Of murderer / might release him; but 1t as
would be done by in the case of the innocent people
who might be injured thereby, should not AID IN his
escape. In the case of the slave | might emaucpate
him but if do l would be lone by, by millions OF
people who are interested in preserving that relation,
should do nothing TO disturb IT, If 1t be such sin
that larger party at the North can have no c0nnec
Constitution then as honorable men they ought TO pro-
nose separation % the South. Would not an honest
course be to SAY, Our fathers made hard bargain
and cannot III cons lenee carry 1t out, ana cannot
return elaves and cannot aid in suppressng lnsurrec
tions-iberefore propose separation There
would be 10 great resistance TO such proposition al
the South There might be separate Unions IN
this way, that might, perhaps, be united oy
some sort Of bond ike treaty which might secure to
them united sreI 9Th ia IepellDg foreign INVASION and
might secure to them of the present benefits OF
trade and Intercourse But why force us to this alter
native d? / know that some acknowledge that they
have no right interfere with it in tie States butthey
will resist carrying into the Territories,
and prevent our exercising any such right.
Mr.. Hunter commended II was theT cohSllI
tntional righ-so decided by the Supreme Court and
no enc had right to resist And further that II was
not for he interest Of New EnQandtO prevent the IN
PRODUCTION OF Slavery into the Territories II the Sout1
was peopled entirely by whites, New-Engiand WOulu
NOT have 80 great relative share of power, Tor the re-
would be in the exact proportion OF popn-
iation Neither would New England ENJOY so large
market there then az now, for the South you'd be
rivals instead OF customers and II the territories were
made into Free States. New-Engand Wouiu
have less relative political power, ana lever
customers than if made into Slave STATES
Then on what ground can she oppose
the extension Of Slavery except there be be an IRE
pressibe hostility between the Free and Slave States
II there be this hostility there ought 20 be no union be-
tween them Bur If there any such hostility lie pro-
postd to anayze the power OF two systems 10 5o"
thew ero sULs diary aud not anlaS0nstc lnthe Free
Labor system the family is the union. In the Slave
Labor sysien the household js the unon. In free
States there two clasesthe capitalists ana the Ia
borug classes who sell themselves TO the
capitalists for LIMITED period. In the
SaveLsbor system the slave il assured OF shelter raj
ment, and food. Iis master must provide hlm tnese
or transfer him TO fome one who can. In the ffee-
Labor system there such guaranty, and sometimes
the laborer undertakes to settle the question OF price
Tor his services by physical force and the British Gov
eminent has often had TO use the bayonet and ball TO
prevent such forcbe settlement of the question by