New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1860-01-02
L. s DISTRICT COURT-Drc 3i-Betore JaJse IsGsEsoLI-
tFIOKU0N CASE.

Ills case adjourned To to-day. came up again for
lssIs mI. b24si'sa who GA St .Pys" ~ ool'. wa,
sha ficss NO "erc prseul by nf j-fhsan snd M oDor
Nj. opened the plaintiff IN eloquent %iiress,
slow affidavit Of n ellsut,
IL IroyeIus t-puou tor rsity aud fair dealing vas
than THOSE the other side now
ever uusou, supported. Re then advanced following
points consideration OF the court;
ff Previous representation at pubic hraer does not IN
rqueu pyiight; for @ was not publication
The Of Coume,s the man follows ths Act oi Ann,
which clearly gives 20 TIE aaho coyglt on any poss Hot
printed plDh-d 4nd title mu't b- cn,ee before pao'
heso q Pre'ioas publication sirIs TO book ana not TO
lhr pUlrhH O. -ucL book Ass nt 70 real u Sn s'tase
gLt D+osir neee-aIy AID 70 p-sious representation is
aud tleie must be Pro Of The abaD'
d.nsHl ,,Le5 o. as apSog; NO. or O5 PROOF "
The oesudsHs playing without any valid oral
license Hey attempted t. .outfa aui setlrd
The basis OF proposed contract which they Hl- ia'J re-
WHOM 10 e1.nt ofte plan. II aad without soy
certsa pnsa,Vn Their sidayits coFtIidcoFy ADD
unltle tst they must be ected altogether waa remains
THEN sh.n whoi. euIsfedf The Oram'e
CoIynsh Lss no chang. IN TIE general Jaw Of copyright
Az trsH relieved the testimony at Length and pointed Sat
What be said fatal contradictions Tns oi conadic-
tous proved tina, the pse. were al on ir ing 70 3a1e
definite and TIE oEy drnn agreement "ss tie 'e'
Ilse be dismissal 3ouIceaut without legal cause
brs boucceah Wa under no onga'H u coahue 20 pay N
tie OeOrool. Her refusal TO play wa' no Jui'son 70 ne
t.siss o. her husband Br.id, Field. od-ied oeUs peat
nt3 lien hT and Mrs b. embraced they v" nj to the taef
feu,S Ife contract Tor the sece Of plaintiff wife aud
Of piece indev.b. contract t i. neither iez.
lO equitable TO 1--WE :. prna, q ossen Of egaf-' the
FUth. jurisdiction Courts Of Equity copy gGts l.
exercised patents Os Lyentsons and arises
fIct anxiety give T. mat he Cou there
oI. hs the rFht dee9e the dpGied title and need not
Ls.t be settled a. law
Sf A ora coLtact wiz give sgh; IN copyright; the
NIT 70 rorm peTt OF AID Interest in copyright, and
only granted ing AID tue ioruAes pEescEioedo 81
seflfr.
SeaLs The construction Ct al copy shoud be favorable
70 erthors the law intended Tor thrir benefit
be wou!i the nIution gz-s they consid
erred ds:sItuts he stsi owners 10 equity q th@ piece
WIN the right n-1 ton jvPeal nPcn
d1a0l ~ but upon the Interpretation
i pat Bron written Is the duty Of Court
9, interpret and gran ref-e luc.u orll1 y.
fGu.fy MI Ir' tne tqg41r Trer Of ga, pfeli
the the 1 owner Uut ~ IL -lIta- j.
efl-l y al iyr 80 convey VI legal
Ia,f. If.h -nc,iln - refused plaintiff 10 gives 1-fu-
20 labor without p-usaion az the
being 49, lr-t -l tre pubic tr-d
90 II also prevents he receiving euatt51 or - lse ele
where.
ne va or - ,fr Jrrlin-sn who IN 81 rtle z-.Irsl.
presented ne ~ poll ,ei, o ne d-enJsn-s:
4tf PAINTS ts tls s DIT -ltl.-s q c.pT
r.ht Five Teri -rrllr- c. tue OltcroJI.'
a. t-r .ef.i,Lc r la l. as NJ lt provide, t1s
~ .A le trl 90 t-- s.ns-t % t1t s... ln-.
fla, n. rs gu4rIn atIlsl. ltd c-y 70. t --e. a..
"a .sr tr-'- I-r Il- rps OF tls ,s a. .as Oct9
~ Go posted lt ID '-- b.. r .-ra4.r 10
le piece a ~ r-lf -It tl-s-f1~
TEl. u che rrcle performance OF the Py 70 t, g.
..'rl a.fsr rllr.- f'Dl
srt- Che si 81 q ,1-ut 1855. li tss.
i.-.t D.. f-.fe fls ll.t I.-.f-
rrT Proprietor rft ~-s 1ls.i. e'-si ION
...l-.Tst.-s T. I. 49, 80 - 80, 90 ~ sis