The register. (Monroe, La.) 185?-1861, 1860-09-20

ehsfeetGk 70 &sl!g w fpleetich okas j.
iflaI 4 kXdsf. 4 aas sASse, H Il H. ia s b..
lp.iQhs ~ to- pfsps s!yaia Ahes Eefrttoflea /
viii read those. and yea can bulge whether
they accord WITH me Position Of .be euprems
ubsaN ana he ppvef1isleAt iSDa aSs fDTn d
stos1ay. Assa ssSNaitA aiiH n9Iiaaao stsfE
Alter reading the aeasaasohs n -b0hsstAed /.
1llss Ayowea. r they, are Copel3a tional thev
1sa6t sectional. for To cdhzit1tion ID isosa
es1leh- tn COVER the, wtple, Vnionsz-tC heerel
&c who stands npnn tie Consultation can, ne.
ther be tectl6lat nor . diauuidni TIE min,
ciples IRE taken almost verba thin rom the 6isinp
ION ,'f.i,e Supreme UourE They IRE suppop
IT'D BY tile prveedente and practice, of the Gov.
srn,tsnt :, they are principles upon witch ~
willing to.die. (Cheers.) They are vitaliypim-
p'atast and, they eoncersa rsghts ef 7peypn and.
property they cannot be abstract, minute or
unimportant, Tor they Concern the honQr and
E4uaitty Of the sta*ea o. WHAT has been tie po-
si.inn Of Kentucky up0,rShat pisl8or 4Thasan-
didate FIR f2yegnor q; thl. state, last year
both he'll that Terri orial Eegfslatutee haye no
power :" exclude our property, and each con.
tended that every department ofGoverernsnt
must protect it when it became, pscesaary.~
MIR. Jisida BELL; Il believe, wuht a'step further
hy thinking the time had now arrived when
the .aovenlment should interpose. , ia 1.;
Yonr Conventions Endorsed these principles
and tlie senate and COMMONWEALTH Of Kentnc.
ky. BY unanimous vote Of both PARTIES intior.
sed h. m asl'eiug constitutional aud true, by
the NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. which must read, II IL
so apt. 60 pertinent. so conclusive. = IS
| GThe resolutions Of the last Legislature Of
Ktntacky, here readsare necessarily omit.
Ni That il word word Tor swioir, The opinon, q the
Supreme Coirt and tile resolution Of the Ma.
Ftionul Democratic convention on Which
] stand to-day. Both parties in Kentucky at
| tue polls aud l,y unanimous votes In the Leg
i$latii,re. have d, clared that these principles
are those If the constitution. . q . 3 A -'' "a
might pausqshsre,s but. In support Of these
principles I want the authority OF Mr.. Critten.
den himself (Appiausp) Whatever doubts
y he may hive as tony fidelity to the constitu-
ftion and Unien. do not hesitate to say that
that eminent gentleman is devoted to- the
Uniot,. do not believe he would advocate
principles whic, he believed were unconstitu.
tionaI III calculated 10 destroy the unin Of this
counIry, and IL cot. have his sanction aud
i indor emenL for the principles ad, ocate, it
will 60 il great way in proving that tLey are
constitutional aud not disulIion. aQi'
INF Bf~ckiuridgehere read the Sd. 4th ard
9Th vi Mr.. Davis resolutions. and ref rred 10
Mr.. Crittenaen's vote for them, ard saidl
! have thew ot',ny distinguish friend, dc.
clarinp that thesee questions are notln'iaute pr
ltuimprlan, tina! tue union Of the states rests
upon equality Of rights among them /; that hi.
,ncr Con lress nor fhe TERRITORIAL L'giphtnrs
has rtght to, infringe ,he constitutional right
pfany. "r any light to be assailed Ivy the Ter
liturial Legislature. and it becomes necessary
for Coz gress 10 interfere to protect that right.
THESE are precisely the principles upon which
va alA,,d 'oday. lCheera.) Ny Distinguished
friend followed the resolutions by a speech
h. A expressed hope that the me might come as
When y would be necessary. for Congress to
intervene tq.protect these rights. trust that
the iimeewill never come When any Territorial
tauthority will he sorfcklesa Of it constitution.
al obligations as to make it necessary for Con.
e5ssx to d. clare its acts void. (CAeers) But
in his speech he. sustained the postum on
witch We stand. in language which compares
veil with the decision Of the Supreme Court