Daily gazette and comet., 1860-06-05

Saturday, June Ind 1850.
Tho Court met according TO adjourn
ment. -,
Elvira Stephens. Administrative vs.. W.
q. (,rayes-No. 1890. IL is ordered, ad-
judged and decreed that there DO Judg,,
ment against the plaintiff, and In favor OF
tho defendant, with costs OF suit TO be
taxed.
n. Lusk vs. p. W. Lusk-No. 2s91. In
this case, IL is ordered by the Court that
y. McIIstton and X. A. Csrruth, Esqs., be
and they are hereby appointed experts
with a view TO ascertain whether the 100
acres of land in controversy can be con-
yeniently divided In kind between the
parties interested--said experts to report
| forthwith.
Oran Hackett vs.. Y. Lenares and T. j.
Bufiington-2sss. On motion Of plaintiffs
| Counsel. II is ordered by the Court that
A dsvolutive appeal be allowed tho plain
Tiff from tho Judgment rendered against
| him in this case, returnable before the
Supreme Court Of the State Of Louisiana,
In the city Of New Orleans, on the fourth
Monday Of February next A. d. 1850 upon
furnishing bond and security, conditioned
according TO law in the sum Of one hun
dred dollars tlOo.)
| Wv. McMain vs.. Jas. 8. Brown-No.
27s4. This cas- was this day taken up for
trial according TO assignment, and after
hearing the evidence aud argument OF
Counsel having been heard, the cause was
admitted to tho Court, the Court took
the same under advisement.
The Court then adjourned until Monday
morning at o'clock.
Monday, June 4M 1850.
Elyira Stephens Administrators vs. W.
G. Graves-No. 1899. On motion Of coun-
sol for the plaintiff. IL is ordered by the
Court that q devolutive appeal be allowed
to the plaintiff from the judgment rsndsr-
cd against her IN this case returnable be A.
fore the Supreme Court Of the State oI
Louisiana In the city Of New Orleans, on
the fourth Monday of February A. ID,
Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-one (ls6l
upon furnishing bond and security condi-
toned according TO law in the sum Of Ont
Hundred Dollars (eloo.)
Michael M. Miller VS.. o. Potts-No. 26s4
Continued with leave 10 plaintiff to an
swer Interrogateries on facts and articles
propoudned by Defendant, on the first dsI
Of tho next term of this Court.
N. Dalsheimer vs.. Mary G. Randolph
and Husband-No. 203l. On motion fo
leave to file motion to allow Henry Z
Umberhagen and Antoine Como, TO inter
vene.
T.. Goodlove vs.. II. y. Umbsrhagen-
No. 2Ti2. The motion to strike out In
terogatories on facts and articles fled b,
the defendant on the first of June, 1885,
was this day taken up for trial and sub
mitted to the Court, whereupon, 1t is or
der by the Court that said motion be sus
tanned, and that said Interogatories bs
|, stricken out as prayed for. 1t is furthe
ordered that the cause be continued.
p. DC II. Lewis Butler. vs.. Tully X
Brady-No. 1884. Continued.
Tirreli d Bates VS.. Brown d Smith
No. 2720. In this case 1t 10 ordered ad
) Judged and decreed by the Court that th'
plaintiffs Tirrell and Bates have judg
ment against, and recover from the sale
defendants, Brown and Smith, jointly
, seyerally and in. solido the sum of EleveI
/ Hundred and Thirty-six and 4S dollar
with interest thereon at the rate Of eigh
: per cent per annum from the 11th day o
Nav, A. b., 1850 until paid, with cost o
suit and protest to be taxed.
q Cornelia A. Williams vs.. c. g. McHat
ton-No. 267s. On fling answer. II !
! ordered that tho judgment by default en-
tered in this case be set aside. Continue,
by consent with leave to both parties :
a take testimony in and out Of the State up
on giving the usual notice, but withou
' affdavit or order.
VIII. N. Magruder vs. N. Blanchard
J No. 27Is. 1t Is adJudged and decreed tbs
Q plaintiff Magruder recover from defendan
Blanchard the sum Of Ono Hundred an,
0 Twenty five Dollars, and costs Of suit I
. taxed.
81 B.R. 7. Il o. P. r. &Co., W. jas. n
I & Jas. Z. Elsm-No, l7ol. Ills ordsrs