The daily press. (Cincinnati [Ohio) 1859-1859, 1859-06-27
l. A w r EPORT T.
SUPERIOR CnuRT

L
! IMPORTANT TO PyRcHAsERs AT TAX SALEs.-Jon
Mitchell vs.. N Feith and others Judge Spencer dis
| title. T. had made sundry mortgages, one being to
glaintin A prior mortgage foreclosed without ma
brings suit 70 iorec9se and the defendant sets mp
ax title az defeating his right to forecose. The tax
Of o o tae RS ~ as t6s south
py 100 deep The part intended by the was 10 feet
The Court held that the description was suficient
II appeared however that the Auditor had failed to
certify the lot as delinquent, and 1t was held that this
fendant could claim only the taxes previous to tile
Sheriff sale and that his claim for improvements
was paid by the rents and profits of the property
King and Thompson for planting Riddle for de-
| Walkers Executors vs.. Walkers Heirs. John
pphow T ana s psde % al h real estate to his
should be carried on by his executors for seven years.
go ms ne h
and running back to the rear of the brewery, were
the testimony, Judge Spencer remarked that It was
doubtful whether these promises were intended Go
settlement subject By he tss ai e
heirs must continue to hold the. property.
Van Hamm for plaintiffs; King for defense.
ys. steamer Gqlnare. Motion to distribute proceeis
for Individual debt Of one Of the owners Of the
boat must give on distribution of proceeds to a sui
seluent SEIZURE Tor stores and supplies, where tho
claim accrued since the amendment Of April i2 1855
podd and Huston for plaintiff; Lincoln, Smith and
Warnock for defendant.
Room No. 3.-Judge Storer heard arguments in
submitted cases, and disposed of q considerable
amount OF miscellaneous business.
COMMON PLEAS.
CRIMINAL SIDE-CooK's TRIAL.--The whole fore
noon was occupied IN endeayoTing to get jury For
called but none were accepted -
une party from Green Township, when asked IL he
nad read any thing OF the trial, replied that he did
NOT read the newspapers he was twenty mine years
% ~ Inet township (Greene) being born there, and he
never never took newspaper, and did not look into
The defendants counsel forthwith objected to this
party peremptorily I,
oIyIt sIDE; In the case of s. Davis VS., VIM. Lee,
70 establish the title TO foot OF ground on Fifth.
street. near john the jury IL Judge Malon's branch
OF the Court returned averdict for plaintiff ~
PETITION FOR ALMoNY- COUNTER PETITION ron
DIVORCE, Melinda Sedan vs.. H. Il. Sedan. The pc.
titoner claimed amony out OF the estate OF her his
band, and alleged in her petition that the respondent
was guilty OF adultery and after living many years
OF nphappness with him he finally Obliged her 10
quit his house. NJ Y 'f
In counter petition, the respondent alleged gross
for divorce. His counsel stated that ne was willing
70 allow such alimony as would be consistent with
the value OF his estate. -
The case opened with the reading of Of
Tered OK the counsel for Mrs. SEDAN, in which the
visiting very frequently the house and private tene
ment OF lady on John street.
0rai testimony was also introduced on this point
Evidence respecting the value OF the respondents
property was here gone into,
Upward OF fifty or sixty witnesses were subponaed
bn only small proportion were called 10 the stand
Ihe case is not disposed of.
Colonel n Chambers and Judge Johnston for peti-
uoneri l. Mitchell and Joseph Cox for respondent,