Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1859-10-11

CuTY ITEMS.

SEQ WITH the minutes oil the last meeting were read aud
"pP,o's ~ ~. ,v ,.-,
me hon 'enn w; e.ePnens OIL NY, appeared anu
'o9s nus - "a, ior the nrst time.
heN' Ut heaue, rom tne committee on famous, 10
Mhom was referred the proposed amendment oil Article
H. OF the CONSTITUTION an amendment laid over RON the
session OF 1851 liking Philadelphia as the permanent To-
Sauon oil the "eneh Convention, reported that having
nAu ne same uh1er CONSIDERATION ohe committee res
Peuui! rePor, hst ths propo-ea amenumee, not eh'
Pu anu ASK 70 pe uisen"'geu ifo" 'ne i"''ner con-
' r, OF tue sase =,
Inc report Was adopea ana the committee discharged
w ~ sa, OF oa,oIn s whn,eu 70 Know whe,ner
u m saoPuon o' ue scpor. VI 'ns comh'se ana ,her
uurse run ,ne ,ur'ne' consueauon OF Tue SUBJECT
~, " 20 sous'e..u "ba"'e VI "'e enienuheht
anu r = nnal esposuon OF "
M M, u.'u ~, -. ~ - "9 - , yous'ua ,,
~, hS -, - n" SO w wncn COM
70 " -. =. we supyec, ron the con
In ~ sssni., eon - K ans,, sAn,e up sgs,n
Ts ~ nc ."A aS.eu upon oy tne pody.
a., ~ s,. s "a 70 ms IMPRESSION,
n - - lsu VI ""eu I" was N'urheu 10 the
~ S.
No'on, v, "aSs eSPresseo inc OPINION that the
s!ee' vas no' 1sPoseo Oh oy tne seoon oil the CON-
mi M. i-' M Iays oa"eu u'o ngn' Tor n,msen,
~. ,s e '''' Vi "''e" "e "A' "'ehoe', 70 DISCUSS
srL -, ... 49,. 80,
H. =, @ s,a.'u sns y wa" IN .ne power OF the
hs.n .don,oS WV 'o'e ~ ""''" '"e 'ePo'' nau
D. NJ S.. IN -. - -,
49, ,,S .en.i y. ~ eaiu .ne rePc., when naa
.Ls.sSf,..- aPy " VI ,"e oPnion VI
40, s;shN :, u wy! H'n W oe ussnhreeu u uoes
ma,,er In ns.,; - III, h % evns,uaon VI tne
80 %. rTsh IN, eou NC eaheu up "san " an!
t,cIIy co ,s;s,sn, ;,h ,Sa ,; f. i sou DC per
q, ,,Ls ,n - ~, - Pnee In ,esussNe ooues,
anv time III, ,ha, -. -" " ~ 'e =. NJ
,n,,aa sorIS ~: y. $3.50 pope,: ne 'sousu' Oo"-
sub;ec, n would hs ;v -, - go; n.,l., VI an!
or ,bsn ,bex onsh, ~ Srae " '"S S0i"'ee 'io'e pow"
He bonsj ,hercsore' ,b1, tho xo,. h,L L., -.
,oLc, wnrId n. .rs.on.;;.tasaa w 49, 'N "Au 0ee"
Goyerno- Alls,on or south n ,o,; ,, -
rss, ,h., ~. ,io =, .o"1 % No 1 susseS.
arv ,ate sny suhic, s a. nnt u;a no,
the uo,ss hn, ,hs, n, - 80 r. ~ ,Y aOu VI
f,,niIisr viii n,rl,sn,sn,os PtI sea''e r,1
was onIv 20 s;mnETy ,h tn,,ai - Soau au'' ini
cessary consumn,on oS time Thee - NV 80, %
the matter shonJ ho Ia;d nsiao n,;s, g 4; @ WI!
n.r for 90 ,s, A., r. " ~ anu !. W." va pro,
ast lie f,r,has considaa,;.D -, ~ ~ W ri sua
o,,o,,,,;,,aa - N, - :, - ~. :. 'o"
referred 70 them WAS os;Jrd d9osot os "Au 'e'
JnJca Csao,ha. ~ Mie, "1P ~ 10, Oh
having renor,sJ rs necesssrx s.onen. ' s sS
cbaryed xi,bont snv VOTE ~ a.. tSor -; ~ u.s
,st.rroJ IN ,be, .,d ,ho, -. -a.,..a a.. .eys.
renort Tbey Jis,,s-.d ~. $50. -; r.. FL -
mined IL Was no, yneden, 10 .don, ,he w.
Ruested They So report Well n that report IL .don;
ed the question a closed for the session h.,;n p
the mode of procedure in delber ,ve hodies a,;
once decided II L 40 considereJ and II nuns,;n ~ A.
cded nv Commi,tse Tia, Co;,, 4; = ue
CHARGED. why sbould ,bey bo vs nner w,
e. -, -, ~ -, ,i 80 ~ ''ou ~ inn''
held therefore, tLa If This reno, bs adon,cd IL onS
nrsciude anv csrems, on ,ha, 49, So -, "ouu
lion 10 discnss ,be s,Ii.c, '
Rer A Watson Of Moth CaoT,. ,;l , IL,
stand that the commenda,iop of :, Comri,,a. - -
tb. ,nsnra, n hill ~ - - =, "o , W
ever oper,ted 20 tho dsfea, of a r,,r r., I, -
referred TO them One of the methoIs In With r.nor,s
are made il that they deem tho nronosed oas.r ~
pedient and recommend that I, 10 No. nass i.j,"hl
then the subject comes I'M again This Comu;,,ee Lo
ever make no Recommendations whatever and sinnI,
AK To he dscbargad from, fr,har .n,s;d, s -,
matter He resn.,,f,Iv COMMANDED ,La, ,Lis ,,;,,
has nothing nj ali 70 do Win ,h ,,,a =, - -; &c
erence TO the propoSed amendmcnt ~ The Ir,.io 90
the Consultation When the Commrtee l. Jiscbsr,si
from the consideration Of the amendment, the rco,7
in the original bill ays upon the table and comes nm in
its regular order and il acted upon hv tbe Hom ~ :"
Mr. Winans of California did moi tbink the action nj
the committee final and arrned In favor a, C,rhr 90
liberation of the subject by the Homse lie rnoyej -
consideration of the vote by WHICH the committee was
discharged and the report adopted
The motion was carried
Mr. Hill of California moved IN Law the reror, n, ,b
table - " ~ ~
Dr. Evans of Maryland moved to amend tho uotion
nv recommittipg IL TO the committee
The amendment Was not agreed IN aud ,bo ,,o,o, 10
Law on the table was carried
Mr. ThraIl of California moved that the vote oS Sat
urd ~ adopting the report from The committee q, Cnons
be rdconsidered The renort re,ds I'm 0''''''
The comnitte. on Canons 20 WHOM, va r.C.--I tho
resolution proposing certain amendment 10 C,non VI
of 1882 report adverse TO the proposed amendment and
asked to be discharged from the further CONFEDERATION
the same"
The same committee also reported favorabIy upon a
proposed amendment to Section = Canon v Of Is3I-
The original section reads as follows.
Section /. The evidence OF the consent of the differ
ent standing commi,t,.s sb,II ho Il, ,ba c., - .
for the House of Clerical and Law Deputies IN General
Convention and without the aforesaid rcopisitcs No
conseeraon shall take Mace during the rcscss Of The
General Convention But in case the election of Ilish
op shall take place within year before the meeting or
the General Convention all matters relative 10 the CON
secration shall be deferred until the said meeting
The amendment strikes out "a wear" and inserts
"ffrec months in lieu thereof
Mr.. TAYLOR Of Virginia thought the House uas acting
informally Tie reports Of the committees was the rt
business o: the day and vet gentlemen were Offering rs
outions and making motions Until the renorts were Al,
received action on any measure was contrary TO the
ru!ts Of order which he hoped would be sdi,red 10 :
He would suggest that he generally understood in the
House that the reports of ali the committees received
be considered as matter of course laid upon the table
Dr. Mead OF Connecticut from the Committed on
Canons whom il was referred to take into consdera
ron and report to the House ibe facts as TO the .ra
ton, and the status of such legislation Of this House
Ia the General Convention Of 1856 upon Canons l. and
H. of 1883 Reported that on the IGt day of October
the l4th day Of the session, a Canon entitled of the
abandonment OF the communion Of the Church by any
Bishop Priest or Deacont vas ns,ented 10 tbs Hons.
by the second Section Of which, Cauons l. and H. OF
1886 were repealed On the 18th day OF October
the 18th day Of the session, such Canon was adop-
ted On the 10th October, the 18th day the session
message received from the House of Bishops as