New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-10-10
SUPREME COURr-GEsERAL TEsM.-Ocr. Before Jus
tees ROOSEVELT, CLEREE, and SUTHERLAND.

tees ROOSEVELT CLEREE, and SUTHERLAND.
THE POLICE CASES.
The Courtroom was filed this morning with the
members of the old police, it being understood that
their cases would como up on appeal.
A short discussion took place between counsel, on
an objection that the order OF the SPecia Term on
mandamus wss not apoeslsole.
The Court suggested that council agree upon some
form of Judgment which could be taken pro formd as
the basis of appeal TO the Court OF Appeals. The
Gaze was then postponed until next Saturday, counsel
the meantime, TO agree, possible, upon the form
of the judgment.
Ey-Judee Dean, Jas. T. Brady, John McKeon, and
John c. Devereu1 for the policemen; VIM Z. Noyes,
ID. ID. Field, and Mr.. Nsnderpoe for Board of Police
CASE OF QUIMgo Apo.
Mr.. u. ID. Field ssked the Court TO name day
when motion could be made at the Court Of Oyer
and Terminer in the case of Quimbo Apo, the Chiaa
man, who was convicted OF the murder of Mrs.
Fletcher.
The District Attorney opposed the application. lie
said be time for the execution Of the prisoner
at hand ard at this late day ne had received the
first intimaton that motion was to be msde in his
behalf
Mr. Field submitted that he could make motion at
any proper time, IL made in respectful and proper
msrner lie would therefore make It next week, when
the Oyer and Terminer would be in session.
THE CASE OF FELTx SANCHEZ.
Mr.. Anthem counsel for Felix Sanchez, The Cuban
who was convicted Of the murder Of Herman Canon,
his fstberin.lsw, made an elsborste argument Oh
motion for trial, raising numerous objections to
TIE Judges ruling in the Court below.
The Dktrict-Attorney for the people opposed the
motion the ground that the exceptions taken by the
prisoners counsel were not well founded. The Mg''-
ment occupied the entire day.
The Court rendered the following opinion in case
heard BY justices Roosevelt, Cerke and Z mott:
WIN p Furris sst Vim II. sro-ls AsmIniHrs.rir:
RoosssLT The eny g. Of this eSs..oysy TaieS ,bs
from Ne~.Yois . csiiorni,, IN he WIt.ef Of lso.
rs verdict found the defendant the sdniosrS
Of her deceased hssb.pd VIM. IL. Brown for Sc ssi co.
S1 S oes to S m abe h Oh S .rd
the alleged Z The Evidence to sustain ether 'aa' or
Brown sd'inaashsd ,hiPeoilaer was the owner y sppe
to FGrph. The plaintiff undivided bar ateest in her By
the Of the ccrsc, n w0z The price vas 70 be q ths
purchaser ., fifteen months The ofthr de-
scnbed the steamboat Rhode Island burden go uns OF
Drs IS she is row completely seS .nd 1rssed G The .,sn.
poatSn Of pas~o se's on the sound Bro@n however, y.
n.nne Tor her 70 proceed from New the Pacific via the
Strait, Of Magellan and TO trade along the vest coast Of Auehes
IN tie ,se,s q the NAV - m t cst 'An'sgeoa
By said William p Farniss after her arrival there"
Brown, 1; g be sod the half Of The vessel not an
borsh B. ,ipal..sd 70 /. Der up in suitable snaer Oe aid
not stpusts % rebuild hsr He 70 make her &c for sea-
p.i.. eon,e plated hat river steam boat bit f9r rivsr
Be CHANGED 3o .es ,;eams She was % be
voyage And mi. Of the contract sonisd
AID less rO'sbe' Tuuiss paying h ob
yiO1,y Insufficient 70 Ordinary rs4aabost no
stesns5 Brown in poiI Of fsct a. his coat aid
nearly double the stipulated and Furnis before giving
bis TIE vessel she ed up for tbs snd,
without comp took Possession Of be-. he was merchant
engaged IN the shippns bcsn sga oupetent probably 70
Of The prudence Of sending such vessel on such voyage
Brown They both tk the risk and think the evidence
gwen The ts who'll, insassa.,s show tss. abe
oss fl any omission the Of Brown or fnen soy or
than the inherent Ina cieney mere sesm
however "hed up a. sea- a. great dis
snce from land.
Th. Jury IN webbing the evidence woas have stsd
upon the idea that Brown had guaranteed the capacity Of 10
tsabost for service In this ninE tn-y erred
tr1sl BE- rrsL,ed-eos's 20 ABIDE ice event -
ssrebord AID Striker ard C. Noyes for ne an'1' VC0n
Ard Peabody for defendant.
The CcuTt rendered tee following teeiscrs'
o. Wells, &c at. Peter March kc -JgaftneIt ennea.
Charles Csu sst Ferdinand Ernst: kcJ ldsmen srf9sa
ACTION BY NOTWITHSTANDING or cohPLAiai'
DsJDp Rseeiyer &c. az CoiirAn-
The following Is the opinion 10 thlS ccsci te0sIHy
decided N tie Supreme Casg: 81 SPECIAL rssa.