The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1859-05-03
yJcEEggs AGAINST TIE lTT.

f0r Alleged Services AS Inspectors Upder rhe
Street Department, IN which ne Call upon
the Street department for, any Defence I'm
Bshssr OF the Guy nAadc by the LAW
Department.
TIE following list of Judgments obtained agans, city,
via panymg Comments, has been furnished ns by
~ head Of me Street Department -
CHARLES DEMoulN- Judgment for $500, as inspector
I25ia street. Services from Sept l6 1856 The contract
N this case not made until JAN r. 1857. II viii be
neRn hs claim four months prior to the
ae OF the contract Hope Cooper and Cusaos AL reco-
yered Judgments on the same street.
WILLIAM H. Acknowledgment for 5000, as inspector
on Forty fourth street. from Jan 1885, TO May 1888
No af asked ihs particular case; but in reply
10 cali for information In the OF james Mciim, who
suet TO be an inspector the street. the Corpo
rs,,on Sounsel was informed ba. John ". MINNIE had
NJ. aucld his appointment ON this work by the Stree.
Cos ssOner, AMI evidence OF ms having ahehNged me
duties as inspector during al the time for which Achm
slaims he paid up TO May /, 1885," Judgment
for anyet by default
GuIERr W. OLIVER gment for $l9i Al, as inspec
ter on Ihnteth street, between Madison and Third ave
auts.
6nnsRr ". 0IIvER--Judgment for slos. CO inspector
os Thirty nfst street, De zen Madison and Third ave
Aues, Il Om AOrust 20, 1856, 10 June 80 1887.
GILBERT W. o1ysa-gndgment for SIPS 49, as inspec-
tr 10y assgoee) runty Sra. street, between Madison
anc Third sv,nnes, for portion OF The lss time. No
such appears On Nj hyor's boos Of inspectors or
sp ary inspector list although he rad appointments
oscar crAnK-Juegment for SGT Il, as inspector On
ESgrslh street SO tire stated.
Oscar A. cIAi,K-Iudgment for Slsi, as inspector
tname of sLres. rot aILoled) fer ninety two days. from
0soAR Acknowledgements or ssi a6, as inspector loy
assgnes) sixty trst street, between 800 s ~
Ydsn avenues. II will be lserSe INA. IsI t. for
mart o; the time foot sated) on sxeesh street, uL
aAs.hsr part OF time on sixty naI sees, ena rOr
another pat Of the time as inspector "a ~ nrscjss To-
sshiy Of the work which he claimed 70 have under ms
charge In The first tgo cases CsfA oo-Hea JUos 'neh'
p.Tprx CoRsErI--Judgment for 1916 10, inspector
rem 2at of Jane 1851 to January J. lSSs Looa,y OF
rsn. by default he claims 10 have been appointed by
w.irss / CAssry-Iudc nen for s3le "a as inspector
om july l. 1851 10 January, 1858. Locality of the work
MOI stated lie claims appointment from Mr.. Charles
aeyn not locate the street On which he per-
JOIN CrTTsR-Jndgment for s2o1, as inspector from
Rcv TO- lskT 70 Nay TO- 1885. Locality OF the work not
John CUTTER .dgment for sll7ls, as Inspector on
Fifty seventh street. between Eighth and Ninth avenues,
fsm goth May, 1857, 10 Bis; Jay, 1887. Thomas
Msspdon appears TO have been appointed inspector on
1Ap vcrk and was paid fcr all the time claimed By
Gui,er Nathan Kavanagh also claims for the work
Apd time. Both Of these reported 10 the Street
psxntmsni which Cutter did not do. Mr.. Cutter also
claims to have been appointed By Mr. Charles Dsvn.
JANIS g. CooPER-Juo gment for $3.50 as inspector
NV 9, street from Third TO Sixth avenue from July
Is, 1856, TO september IL 1857. This appears TO be
us claim, far as the records OF the Street department
inspectors
GnSERr acknowledgement for sls5 81, as inspector
Fifty nth from Tenth 10 Eleventh avenue from Sep
senber J. ]s5e % November ~ 1857. Albert s. Bauta
aas recovered Judgment 5000 - the street and
fsrence Branagan has been paid, by judgmen: and
she $542 81 for the Sork OIL tie same street.
so henry West RECEIVERS judgment for 5000 for the same
work making than 81 200 paid for supervising a
Job where Sco worth OF work had been done by the
contractor curing that time. The work not being pro-
gIess these parties we're not entitled TO pay
JOHN acknowledgement for SAG Us inspector on the
"a tarv plarp MT q
aIy B, 1865. No was in progress mere during the
time Of Eogan's claim and for many mouths pregious
consequently he OF entitled 70 pay for services rne
show that be appointed an Inspector but
tne appoint ment was booked
DENNIS HASIxy-Judgment for Sf5, az inspector from
December g. 1857 to January 1885, Locality of work
not stated In ths information be gwen,
street specified which the alleged services were
ALBERT S. BASTA-Judguaent for $500, inspector on
NY fifth street, between Tenth and Eleventh avenues
No tims stated.
ALBERT BANrAJudgment for $50 10, as Inspector on
came street. No time stated
Cos sac -Isspssses. ~
20 this particular claimant il will be seen that Cilber
DHean, Terence Branagan and Henry West have been
already paid on this work during large part of the time
has been IN progress Mr. Banta Claims to have been
appointed by Charles Devln.
r. g. Acknowledgements for s4e2 as Inspector on Fifty
Axth ST. eet Broadway and Sixth avenue from
November "a 1885, to January g. 1858. The ordinance
directing the work to be done did authorize the an
pontment Of an inspector consequently there could have
been no authority for appointing him previous May
1857. Moreover the contract made until the 9th
Apil lSoI, nearly four months and half subsequent
the Gate which his claim inspector commences He
nevertheless RECEIVERS judgment for the whole time.
DANIEL LYSS-Jucgment for 1924 10, Inspector for
ZIG days before the LIST of March, 1853 Location Of work
not stated. OF course, this claim located no de-
mite Information can be given the party claims 70 have
been appointed by Mr. Charles Deyiip On list of iudo
Den;s furnished by Comptroller Flsgg Daniel LYNN as
pears TO have recovered judgment TO the OF March
1sSs as inspector on Fifty sixth street. from Fourth ave-
hue 70 the East river, for S453 9S 1t will be seen
either that Mr. beng paid twice for the ZIG DAYS
previous 10 LIST OF March, 1858 that he have been
pay for both at the came time.
CHARLES Acknowledgement for 1915, inspector for
15S days, between July 6, 1857 January 1858 To-
cation Of work not given in the complaint In case
Judgment given by default Mr. Charles Moore claims
tshave been appointed by Mr. Charles Deylin.
JAMES Aforementioned for Sls2, as inspector
from December IA, 1857, April /, 1855. Location Of
work not given He claims appointment from Charles
Devlin Judgment by default OF course, nothing can
be known of thes clam the locality ia not specihed
DAVID Acknowledgements for sl55 81, as inspector
from November So 1857, to March l. 1865 Location of
work not stated. He also claims an appointment from
Mr. Charles Devlin. Judgment by default
JAMES acknowledgement for s24s inspector 1853 days
prior TO April /, 1853 Location Of work stated He
claims appointment from Charles Devlin No evidence
mat be has performed any work this department
Srests August 10, 1867, April /, 1853 Location Of
work not stated BE claims hH appointments from
Charles Devln Judgment By default.
JAMES Acknowledgement for S1S4 49, as inspector on
Eighth avenue, from Hath street l25th street. from
February ], 1858. to May !, 1858 (by assisnee).
work. from October IA, 1851 to February 1858 10y as
sgnee) The contract for this work was dated October
Is. 1866 and confirmed by the Common Coun-
III. No work done by the contractor and con.
sequenty there shadow of foundation for this claim
Ar Nelson up the l4sh of November, 1857, recovered
Judgment for 1854 81, on the same street, which en-
braces part Of the time included in the second judgment
Mus making total of 1898 60 obtained for the nspec
hon Of work which was never commenced by the con-
tractor and for part Of the time be paid twice.
JOHN f. OTooLE-Judgment for Sl62 70, inspector
a Seventy ninth street, from Broadway TO Hudson
fiVer-Nov "a, 1857, 70 Feb. /, 1858 BY assignee.
JOHN OTooIE-Juogement for sls7 70, as inspector
same street, from Let February, 1858 TO LIST May 1858
BY assignee Daniel McGinn and John P. McGinn re-
covered judgments for the work ths same street.
embracing part Of the time claimed by Tooe together
amounting 10 1854 so; and VIM. rwne who eppsars 10
70 pave oeen the only proper Inspector the work has
Oeep PAID or the whole time Included the Judgments OF
the other three There thug four claimants on tbs
work and all recovering judgments for the game time
JAMES j. YouSG-Judgm ent for Sal So as lpspec.or
on Thirty sxth street. from Second Third from
Sept H. 1856 to October g. 1885, The records Of the
office show that this just claim w
ISAAC ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS for $24s 49, as insuec,or
from Aug II, 1857 to Dec. 81, 1857. Location Of work