New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-02-25

r.r5n,epi IN the appiistior So co., FOR priut.
"a NsnIs that they shall be giyec - the lowest
responsible bidder, was adoPted-hoaS i''' Nays "O'
Tls wrapping paper is to be furnished in the same
irOrv other amendments adopted, was one pro-
dag FRAT al gums heretofore appropriated 20 tre
'~c,ssu of Post. Office buildings which snail remain
n Ire Treasury uIcxperded at the close Of the present
fsc, year, gre hereby reappropnaiei i.r tnos7 90
jec.s. ,o
Mr. B0COCk, from the Select COMMITTEE 70 eA'
,uise into the alleged naval contracts and fauds
rresested report from the majority OF TIE Oon'n'
iee.
That ths testimony proves the existence % sIa go.
40 The RrookyD Navy Ysd, requiring The % ~ ~
ltiVs rsiorn They have been tfo~i1s " ''' ''Ns
Tss cos Arercy IL he bsnd n 1so1D.tsai s ,srs
ans reform s needed 10 the Regulations on tne ~
"a no evidence 70 ,how, tssi hs A. W.,birgtop
cam. the knowledge OF tbe ~, .s,S =,
To- Sc osE he Kept the good Of the Paoe and the in
h .ss he contract, for the m,ehy Of the
go q the Secretary has esgayso Aadao zeal 70 secure
NJ, grs. SHERMAN 20 and RITCHIE PENN
;on IN report ard resolutions. Ihese are given in
fun in another part Of this paper nj. sherman
also reported bill TO regulate the Navy haIcs aud
Docks and for other purposes.
The consideration OF the report was postponed I'll
Nordsy, and the Naval Appropriation bill taken ap
10 Cosnrntee Of the Whole on the State ofthe Union
Mar. WILSON Val argued against prOJecuOn ITO
said there was necessity for an alteration OF the
Tariff and defended the appropriations for the Navy.
MI HOWARD Mich cOntsrded that 1t Is impossl'
bic 10 ase $50 900 from TIE present tariff Ho
f.yoted a discriminating tariff for protection.
Mr. CURRY Ala insisted that we must equslize
our revenue and expenditure. There were Tetrench-
mfut end economy on one side, and enormous taxes
IN tbs other sno no American statesman should nesl-
tate 70 select the former.
Mr.. NICHOLS lOLIOl svoged himself IN taYoT OF
free trade and direct taxation. OuT present eys ase
rot from TIE tariff bills but from legislation here slim
ulatirg speculation.
Mr. KUNKEL argued in favor Of specific duties,
and that pOtectiSe tarf was the bestreyenue taut
Mr. VALLANDiGHAM contended That all interests
should be regarded in akiDg tariff. DE was not a
friend Of tie Tariff Of 1857, which 10 garted as
usnufAoturers tariff, and highly protective at that
sacrificing the interests Of the pfoaucer.
Mr.. THAYER pointed out the confusion That ex-
ised in the Democratic party and contepded that tae
Republican party was highly Iat0na.
Mr. BLISS Ohio advocated tSIlh revision and
specific duties for revenue purposes only.
Mr. REAGAN Texas advocated bill TO reimburse
Texas for money EXPENDED by her for the suppression
of Indian hostilities.
Mr. BOYCE is. ca spoke against modification OF
the tsI but for a reduction of expenditures and for
making the Post. Office Department st-sustaiLing ~
bring the expenditures within the receipts
Mr. GRANGER IN. " spoke for the protection OF
tho manufacturing interest and thereby benehttius
al classes.
Several other speeches were made. Adjourned.