New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-03-09
SUPREME CoURT-cHANBERs-niRcH s-Before Judge
iugrshsGn.-OPHiOSs.

AblAbams sgt. htchel II al
Tie defendant Mitchell was q Nonresident, and
proceeding. scaus Der such 30 ioscoss
orsg After the oreer Of publication was served the sum
MOI aS e9HP n ' e I.sS OSfP S 'Tysd
deposit Of lttsr In the Posoce was omitted and judgment
lie order Of rfsrs1ce was ads on Goth September 1883
To- question 10 submitted his motion whethe. tbs pub
cia II the u the action and the deposit Of
notice Ia tae Office rendered Unnecessary by per
sa service Of the SUMMONS aud complaint on the defendant
The Toe statute are peonal service OF copy
tie and plain. out Of the siae equivalent 20
Publication deposit 10 the PostOfce" The natural ssd
mary understanding of this provision that personal service
q le State takei the place Of publication aud deposit In
By mail ia inform the defend'ut that the
obtain. Tie notice in sBy other way By pesora service DOT u
the and compzi t cannot he doubled
that the defendant certainly Informed Of toe
nsi OF Tie ac-o. Aa 'Ae ~d nave oeeh ~ 1lDn Atom
T. The psper which she might BY letter ia ths
P0itOGice which she n iebt peyer receive.
IN case Of Lchhsd az bgf"el ana oles Howard ~
$40 holds that personal service ont Of the STATE merely dis
E I'd .tus pubieatol is ssil nseessay Ia Toins1n az
Va Nscheu Code Rep. N. T. e the contrary held and
equys-rt 20 the puboston depo Of the
summcDs AID comp ANT 10 the P-stOaee
The be IA accordance with the statute
where Of the STATE Jurisdiction
him can b. obtained except By yus Of these proy ons Tae
sst1s fore be s.r y 09wed This provides that
Vhre the debtor resides out u The state the service may be
uUbcAtiop
expired From that me the defendant has twenty day b
appear and sDswer ser twenty days nave expired
Tbe ,istSs then provides An equivalent for the puba.
toa and aepcst Ia the p, Uh.ce. but .hs res. Of
the proeeedirs must De under tl section TIE plaintiff
may publish and deposit TIE copy summons, &c In
Oc. b. may sdoot the equivalent for the plbica
t0u std depo. BY pssouA seryic- % tho aad
con II bs bot In either Gaze tnis only
pe.ei Ne ,.ce u me process snc ~ tec4on ~ In both
whether II pubiesoo service OUT Of the St,e the
service to 0s dseme complete only a. tne ekPIaon u the
aile pteieiibed b. tie oraer Of Publication
Tie tire 70 oriy gen the service com
psts and oos,, bsTre Dsoes'Ay taat IA both
the t1 fer app AID or snswras 1os so expire anil
tseLty days sf sr the service Is perfeCtet.
sth sbsss,,r Tbs referee = whom The csss "a. rsfssd
"a. I'd h. tie papeI served the lat Of Iuy arm
~eirt Of he tydebos from alsre.d persons ss.ns, the
dsf-IesHt See rgs. slo~n By persons zho
leb we've the cae sonnt:. that he p,9e
were delivered % hsr return from heWYor the
Feel strained deny This motion, becsuse rsh. Of IN.
gr,ules wn.en Il "a MADE se1ole In oomg 30 however
not dispc,se exclude the d.fsudsu further
ihs es-abh Der absence Sou NewJersey TIE
osy lie mons ,lesse 70 l.. served.
Tes crmssncss tes2ss by her di.coss hard c4Ie. but
Ica wah 10 a l 10 ssys The defendant, sccona
o. her schs h,d ne motion been male az oncs $40
have been relieved b., after waiting Ill The property has
been SOLO ana Ia, 2,sed b. to trd parties
TIE motion ds1ss wh SO eo,.s without prejudice %
Ds@s Of tse motor As soud Of ~an. Of service Pro
H,pry G. Dunnen p, a. sgt Eugene KeteIt.s ct al
IN leiJ IN Injunction granted ia tas case, re-
5H 5. r. a os Il .5 room . o s ne sisa E.is
sls- asogs sHFnur the ground that TIE esfsod-s
ius, according 70 The p'Oviion, Of ,hs iea,e A.,
Tor ipJgucii0p TIE ecirn laLtsDos move = ds.ss -
TIE motion i made in co1egGegee - d-cson o. tns
Con. u Arpsps ii !1ns m gss0n K.el - ~ u. T.
hfo,Tts 4 ths cont led, IA cous.nH leass
ogntsrv IL sra cvslsrts The yrsut one, TIA. tie
uaurd could uyt maintain En fo3 specific Performance
oi he spp0t ePaiteFs and IA, tosEs
c'tsY Of equity fsdn thz- the o. y remedy II M
pantns sctor q. av 70 recover dsnsEss for
5-sl n he ed u The Use. A. decision
rn.s rom tie hE5-s. Coart he sst., stas
land esuIols az iEfsfer Cogr Tue Importance AID
int q cecson wheh Lccs that Ia leses contracting cove
uauts % sypraise The bad and pay the vs.c for them
or gys q he ssss ,f farther term lessor cav
-iuis spgfas, II ysls. snd er.upol tie ssss
osr refnecy actiJn fer damages obtain eorap-n
~ iCf as improve cetS, Lay vel A8rm ss
o. leases q o n t city which they have costly
sxD4sie1 % ts1asdy
r tsAtou . ssoa ssE Cana. na4J be sss.ss
irrssrot sisi- persoH.
.ss Bo-eyss ground un(er la. de, ou ueoa ~elea the
n 1nctcn b ustslse TIE Cour. hs1s tGe -se-
have rersws because there soprsiss ard
the Court caILot pe .p,rsemeDt bscs1ss donk
tee oscson wcld b. 10 eouft win policy Of TIE
N which p,rs gsties 10 al subasoa TO
iTstrs,On AEesd, maze.
This decision essbhAsss the p.ntF eutiisa -
equitable rei- Of aI. ;hs.e gs3u s)r
ssy anssr eo.ta4iss - lI.zcsos-