The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1859-06-04

Landis' was only of many similar cases, that it
looked like personal antpathy to prosecute 1T with
such vigor,
| DR.. Monmonier replied that the committee in
making up their report had been melted by no per-
sona feeling, but the case having come before the
Faculty, he urged its prosecution, and all the sue
ceeding steps were taken for the benefit of the
Faculty.
Dr. Kemp called attention to the bylaws, and
suggested that there no law to expe man
| from the Faculty. He thought that if Landis was
the man he has been represented to be, they had
better be careful how they acted without aw-thev
might get themselves into trouble and before punish
ing any one they had better look to the code and
make the laws.
Dr. McKew asked if the expulsion of Drs. Mar
| tin, Huet and McNIanus had been made public He
thought if not, it was uncharitable to act harshly
| in this one case and so eniently in others.
The President replied that he did not think they
had been published.
request was here made to have the letters of
Drs. Lands and lnlOes read
DR.. Monmonier took the floor and read them
Before doing he stated that Dr. Lands having
been charged with ungentlemany and unprofes-
sonal conduct, the letter of Dr. Inloes had been re-
quested as evidence against him. The letter of Dr.
Lands, in which he charges Dr.. Inloes with NAL
practice, was requested in order that both sides
should have fair and impartial hearing
When the letters had been read, Dr. Frick arose
and said that as far the letters were concerned
it was but question of veracitv between the two
gentlemen, and the Faculty had no right to decide
between them.
DR.. Monmonier reiterated the corroborating
statements of Crook and DR.. N. r. Smith, which
went to substantae the facts set forth in Dr. Inloes
letter.
At this stage Dr. Morgan asked leave to withdraw
his motion made on Thursday to expel DR.. Landis
from the Faculty.
DR.. Frick offered resolution to cite Dr. lands
before the Faculty, to show cause why he should
not be expelled.
DR.. Dunbar moved an indefinite postponement of
all action in the affair, which, being put to vote
was lost.
permission of the Faculty
DIR. Kemp moved to recommt the whole matter
to the committee and get full, plain and concise
statement from Crook. A good deal of excitement
was manifested during this portion of the proceed
lngs by the members of the Faculty1
DIR. Steiner moved as a substitute to place the
letter OF DR.. +. Landis record as full and suf-
Gent explanation of the conservative action of the
Faculty In the case under consideration.
Dr. DE Loughery moved to lay the affair on the
table.
The motion put and lost.
The question was then called for, and DR.. Stein
err motion to record the letter of Dr. Landis, was
adopted.
The meeting then proceeded to transact the next
regular business which was the election of officers
with the following result:
President (by unanimous choice) DR.. George
Z. Nj. Roberts; Vice Presidents. Drs John K. W.
Dunbar, Samuel Chew and William M.Kemp;
Treasurer, DR.. j.. Gilman Corresponding Secre-
tary, Dr. G. f. Morgan; Recording Secretaries
Drs. Henry M. Wilson and W. j. Wroth: Execu-
tive Committee, Drs. j. F. Monmonier, A. F. Du-
lin, Samuel Chew, C. Johnston and w. J. Wroth;
Library Directors, Drs. Fonerden, John Morris d.
Morgan, g. Johnston, George Johnston, William
Waters, of Frederick, and c. c. Cox, of Talbot
county.
The meeting then adjourned until to-day at
twelve O'Clock.