Daily national Democrat., 1859-10-21
Democrocv of New York.

Democracy of New York.
The proceedings Of the Hard and Soft Con-
ventlous in New York are of much interest
to the Democracy at large. 1t is well known
that two separate Conventions were held, the
Softs retiring from the original Convention,
irregularly organized, after violent and
noisy struggle between the two factions, sew
eral shoulder striking alterations and the
drawing of pistol upon Isaiah Rynders.
Daniel S Dickinson recognized the regulari-
ty of the Convention of Softs, denouncing the
Of those with whom he had been
expected to act, and counseling harmony in
the party.
The split in the party and the assembling
of the two seperate Conventions does not af-
feet the State ticket for the reason that the
two Conventions nominated the same ticket.
So far there is perfect union and harmony
notwithstanding the separate organizations
The difficulty is with respect to the delegates
to the Charleston Convention. The Wieting
Hall Convention under the control of Fer
nando Wood, decided to leave the election OF
delegates to the Charleston Convention, to
the people of the several Districts, and called
State Convention to meet in January next
for the purpose of electng delegates at large.
The other Convention did not choose to
await any such further action of the eope,
considering that the delegates then and there
assembled were fully authorized to make the
selection. Accordingly the following dele
gates were selected. We give their political
status as it is set down in the New York
Herald
DELEGATES AT LARGE.
Dean Richmond. Douglas
Augustus Schtll. l...............D Dickinson
lsa"c Y. Fowler. ler................Do douglas
Delos De Wof. Dickinson
ARTERNArEs.
John J. Taylor..... ....... douglas
Daniel f. Teman. ...............Do Douglas
schuyler CrlIien. ............. dickinson
G. A. DanGy. ......... . Dickinson
DISTRICT DELEGATES.
VIM II. Dudlow. douglas
Iunls q. Bergen. n................l dickinson
Francis b. Spnold. d..............D.ck .ckinson
IL. AIcLnugnIlh. ............... dickinson
John savage. douglas
Nliham Miner. r......... .......Gulhrle
John Kelly. ................... Jas l. Orr
VI. /. brennan. ..............,...G .Guthrle
Isaac Rynders. ............. buchanan
Edmund Driggs... ........ dickinson
John Cochr"he. ............,... Hunter
Edward Dugro. ...............D Dickinson
Nelson j. Waterbury. .......... Douglas
VIM. n. Mcintyre. ..... =. Cobb.
Edward Cooper. Douglas
Andre Froment. t..............Do Douglas
Gouve incur Kemble. e........... Buchanan
Edwin Croswel. l..............D Dickinson
Benjamin II. Edsall. l.........D Dickinson
John Q. Halay. y.............. Douglas
VIM. f. Russel. l.................Dic Dickinson
George Beach. .. ... Dickinson
Theodore Miller. er.,,......... douglas
Henry Stats. ...................D Dickinson
David l.. Seymour. ..............D Dickinson
Moses Warren. n..................Se Seymour
Erastus Corning. g................GL Guthrie
Peter Cagger. ...................D Douglas
John lltcomO. O....,.............W Wise
Charles II. Ingalls,. .. ...Duugl
Lemuel Stetson. n.................Do Douglas
sidney Lawrence. ............. Guthrie
james {. Spencer. ............. Dickinson
L. Carryl. ..,...,,. dickinson
Alohzo Z. Paige. ...............Gu Guthrie
/ David Sparker. Douglas
Samuel North. Holt
Alexander II. Burhans Dickinson
John oiry yker. er................ Seymour
| ID. L. Bissel. l............... Seymour
John f. Hubbard, Jr. Dickinson
Henry 5 Randall. .... ...... Dickinson
Luke d. Smith. .... ..... Seymour
Sidney r. Farchild. Seymour
~ u west. ........... .....Seymonr
Allen & Beach. h................. Seymour
james p. Haskin..... ......... Douglas
John >. Peck. ...................D Dickinson
U. T. Ross. ....... Douglas
Aaron Griswold. ld.............W Wise
W. W. Wright. ht................ Dickinson
ID. A. Ogden. Observation-Disclosures Seymour
Henry }. Barto.. ............ Dickinson
Charles Hewlett. tt................Di Dickinson
=. y ID. "alker. Douglas
a. .. Abbott. ..................W Wise
- -; JtWTt1' .'.'.............. Guthrie
ID, d. + Unison. ...........,...... Guthrie
" m Ii. Chapman. ............ .DOuglas
Henry j. GlOwa wa,ki...........Do Xxi Douglas
Sandtord L. Church. ch.............D Dougias
a. IL. l. istman. .................W Wise.
Jo"n T. hudson. .Guthrie
A'pheus frlnce. .................G Guthrie
john Z. DeverauX. ........... Dickinson
AAli"il D. lher' ............... Dickinson
REHABILITATION.
Ut D'cNlhsoh'' '''......,........... 20
DouSias. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. ....2l
seymour ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. ....
Outhrle. .................... q
'se' '.'.'''.. '................
huh'eF ...'..... .......,.......... /
N"uo .''s'..'.. ........,......... /
H"IJ. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. e.
Buchanan. NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.. 2
Orr. ...''.'.. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. !
According to the above classification. it
would seem that Douglas has the advantage
in the delegation; for, the majority of the
scattering delegates, will most likely 20 for
Douglas, when the question comes to an all.
solu,e choice between him and Dickinson.
Indeed the New York Tribune, which has
been calm spectator of the movements at
work, is 50 tirmly Of this opinion, that it does
not hesitate to say that Dickinson has COM
mtted teto de Sc and that he has lost all
l..