New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-04-20
LAW NTELLIG ENCE.
surEsiox coURr-s,se,,L r..--Arut ia.

LfARILtrIEs or OwsEBs OF WILDCAT BASIs-cON-
sTRUcrior oy sEw.JsRs,T B,sErsG LAW
ysDes D.Joa R-o'iy.S q TIE ams toss tIe1ssse Baas'
az.iTs. John B. Betr,
OPISIOs-SI 0ssOs, J.-fne action a btoaght ny
TIE pss ~ Rsesr,r to safrce rsynsn; ey the irfeassai,
"a ere CT a. sub.csssu ceufcs, whereby re-, With
o1ers s-oci.tse t5-ssves tos-Itsr banking sss
ten under he Jersey = sc ap9n his
suh.crip,Js vi ~ sufficient - hsrdss Sls aisossSse as
ou,.ndn, E,ses q TIE bank Alo for -. Pursn.>
70 enforce payment y bo ot tie o. a o. Tho
,.'casns of the vtcb alleged tie asienisa'
",oIrsll .h-t's;tee Ms ssPToPriseo % hn "a ue
! IVA; tse sisas "a. no; as III =. Rss-iver
fh't there Az ciO. deh's due by TIE eSas
~ TIE e .. Iefsey OF TIE ~ o e=n.ns- To -'ie-o
e re se Is ct stFs uPoa tie endAaE a. e'seaee Of
rs.,tst o,rs s.d 70 lea, po-., to ,-p ueh BIZ q st
soc thAt obAS .tin oey on me ssp5r
,cooI~l N tis u oiyieua. cassity.
int th- osf-oesDt.,ub 1s;oo for 'sOok ,
y part ssor Of tctor % ne he ia
f.yor e. sosl eole's Iepse.eot-c BY n. Resr
h,c ssIt,o Urn 81 hi. terrssio tos back
NJ couclo,oas upon TIE thsse.
Fl,i Toe Court Of Cnsnosr s,st- II N-~Jsrsey
L,c .icou u roe subject ate, # -s controversy suit
Il 20, ks'tl NJ. ''sI As s6 5s's' s
h'a Count Ot superior ~ he afi'ie.oo .ad - loii
he u.;tertfat ~s IN i.,ue b,f-u tCln,ltiou J. a.
smiths i-siirg II "slsce'. cotrc, rs
~. .,, &c. " 80
Syndrbs n ti. c,e admits 'se Insolvency ot the
bal sLd TIE appointment Of R-0-y-T ~ the Je!cit
c-.e1s tie Cou ObAEceTy soul! Pr'ma h- syid.nee
tssf l,ivr esidsree Of hs "A p al a Is Jan''
dc'iolsl fae tS.c. suS Z th- &C sb5ve cited -
MoeovsI ID. eesa-a' .sai't TIE s.Hs W s'e .1o'o
and be be uESxd aHd that e'tsobshs one
Tb. ueEneo h,. nO been inpe,cbed fraud COLLISION
uske AID toer,o's elusive upon the di.ntan IN as
acton a. evidence - ttbt dee o' nc bAnk ss NC
~ lou,b, SNo. K, 479 See sst Blum, ? }. T. so
T,ra Thu ec.sy G'Po'es Of the r9uoo Of dst-a'e that
he ba1i hsi n sss I, 90 'P, ne o q sAea'0s o''o
II u, udsmel, coO,asve the consideration Of The deb.
upon ubbh {, funded cannot b. inquired Into
II be qut ,5r og-D snoald De sr.usy %
~ opuion that be bank bsd be m capacity O. sjntat la
ts rn by il Pi-i.ut suo tai this soce t,o
hold tina favor 1t tt- p.Ltit whose bous hdes 10 rot ais
pate you'd the fact thst he nogc y he ot OF
81, Hi Il ftz)
Foa, The s.b,cr ptou Of the dairndan c'a.ted legal
fo ~ s least 20 The eS,snt q th can, OF aud
Obligation b enforced II be sCt Of the Resivet
Act concsu irs CoPoI'no2' . ~. acc y
hsiosd Co est dudley H.r on Rep SO, SSory Receiver
sat Duboi. ssDef "a s6o -,
Fup Uncrr sSdsoce a. the tnd hHt the oerai
psiied witt bis interest IN the nalA th time
hsbe tn. .ptauo- psntd rssye hun
from liability a u oiisira sab.cii5rr ior stSoE.
Up6er these pet.uded that tbs 3eend
paid collar toward ns subscription l, becomes
unnecessary to opinion 80 20 D." LAoJ IL repe'
10 The circ1la'irs pous = h1Iasl oy hin.
have doubt however OF he liability 20 ieidrs the whole
smount
Upe parties uncn the amount 1T the outand
los oebs Of tbs bars THERE {? ascertain sad
SANE there nutt De judgment in favor Of the
plaintiff ssu the defendant mt he paJ go the stock 'n
by him smOuDt vol shs oe equal . s,ch rhsa "a
ed rot esdi.s the auou n srch slo'crp
s-d by the receiver Ia a'hmeIs 0i 'aca In
debtearsss With inteIs,t sad -o.s Of this suit
j. L. JsrlesAn Or plaintiff Joan isrii Ter ieiendant
SUPERIOR coURT-sFscI.L TEEa-AsEiL u. Before
judge HONCstEF
Edward K. Humphreys &c, sgt. julius Ssmson.-
Motion 50!si.