New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-06-18
SUPREME CoURT-CnAssEss-JUxs l7-Before Justice
ROOSEVELT.

SUPREME COURT-CnAssEss-JUNB l7-Beore Justice
ROOSEVELT.
PRACrrcy-CLgRicAL OMISSIONS.
II. q. Abby ss. Charles '. Warren
Tie summons and complaint were served on me de-
hndsnt on the lst inst The BRAIDED Supreme
Court-Cy snd County Of NswYork bat the complaint hsd
the Of the CONT or County On The Sh ms the de-
properly entitled Plaintiffs attorney asked leave 70
So, IraI pfnS.S, s,orney INSISTED Upon paynent u
Of motion Plaintiffs attorney offered go co . a6es
made writing aud returned as irregular PLAIN
tn tlen served amended complaint IN which ne omission
corrected which also returned and The motion cam up
this before Justice Roose " no refused % hesi .rfl'
waldo Abbott Tor plaintiff r. D'osway for de-
ieEdant.
Oliver T. Pral sgt SOLOMON Andrews two suitsl.-
Motion 70 Pr, these the calendar of short causes
Thomas johnson agt Thomas w Egan.-Motion 10
discharge order Of arns, denied, with 10 costa
The People rel II. \. Cummins, a. Attorney,
&c. Cornelius Voh., justice This I, an apphes' %
ground u hight o. that ground ne party hn.e
should have the rss0r hi. aorny MT aFzres7d aud
CIxculr-Bsfore Justice SUTHERLAND.
John J. Benedict join H. Adrch II a.
This was action TO recover the Yalue OF stock
Of gods. e.sd y ne r1niiz a. ai1 PoPy ~5s va.
DAVID Cars from pntf claimed ha1 bouEht ,he
sod The detsDdau;s sgsd ont bond amen
Shh ind,sn ,y oud the sheriff Tn plaintiff
claimed be owner goods under bill Of sal. from DAVID
CLARK. l. 10. disputed that =, he t- Of %. 0 OF ,s u
Clark Benedict the iner largely In debs aud nat bens
de. knew Of It.
ground II cssus that the bill ~ rnd Lent
ard Up b-,~esn tH p4nt and Clark he prop
sy and .eep from creditors. then pressing Clark
II spp-s.d tbe thai Lat portion Of toe goods were odd
under execution wilg sscien IN III cas q harnes
the plaintiff in this o. the delivery Of he Blu u s
he plain delivered Clark deed n ceran real ese,
-cut-d 5y Er1cs Thoras Clark. Tis DID within ,
Bepedift reerted Anf Tnrs
made deed Bsu.die: Il the pop-r:y, and Bened.
| then conveyed II 70 Clark.
Benrcc ,sa.d that ihe sale IN god faith and cirk
tsnhsc keep the property Of e way Of ere
snu Up maturing rap-E eond b. psid from hr sas Of ins
Benedict r : n ID cash, AID hcy 20
become ps1srs Clsrt rad previously made assignment 20
Tracy B-usdc. had kno~edgr and Crk MI, Ben
compromise It'll hs
e.1.0s released .e assgnee aud ~ rssna
erred ,he roo. 70 Clark Subsequently Clark sold snf
ehaUz-e the r.s inz husf he ground nat
BeLeict rad ,aien cs nlsy from The te "a . he
value b. Tks jury rendered g-fd or tae De-
f.ndaut Chsunc.y shs FIR snd Alfred acnt. f9r ir,is
Charles A. Peabody and r. hard Wyncoop III eendsI
TRUST HABkAS CORPUS.
The points OF the petition of Mary r. Trust FOR the
II children prsssned II tn legal repo, lev
days Jos-Dh Trust ths respondent. made
DENYING May wife The following = the sub
Of s he wr A. the time nsn-
toned II he petition procured wit Of hAbeas T the
sensf Of us TWO children, CoIssrce and Andres H TIE
rt Of whom Mary taxing with bsr 10 CshtrnA
" company vita d. ssassl LysSn ssss sg eeaesaUsa; d