New-York daily tribune., 1859-07-02

The water rents produce annually an amount sufi-
cien to pay operating expenses the interest ON that
portion Of the debt and annual sinking fund for its
gradual extinction. The balance of interest pro-
vded for by taxation. The sinking fund of the sew
erage loan now amounts to ,OoO duly invested ac-
cordipg to the provisions Of the act. Tile assessed
value OF taxables in the city was 10 1867 $26 932 $685.
in 1885, $3l 1885, 0si and in 1853 s36 900, ,000 being
only one third of the actual value. The population
in 1855 50 59, and in 1859 is estimated at $780, 0O0
Some days since we made some remarks upon tue
decision in the case of Out t~a'er agt. Trsvers S Je
rome. Mr.. Outsater has sent the anne Ked COM
muncation, which appeared in The Syracuse DAILY
Journal, and which republish, in order 10 place
bis defense befre readers:
ovTwArER AGAINST TRsvERs JERoaE-The maicou,
the Nee paper. plainly indicate
from hieh they that but f the ndon emen.
par might be .dmi.oa Of the justice of the
attacks and therefore asb that give the same publicity 10
this you have q the sndslous charges
In Ii, ysou. vtee hi. idea sought TO be
yey.o plaintiff without proyOcaoa Ia. prosecuted
brought ac;oi f the purpose OF Obtaining n
despdan,, large amount Of money psd by them for plaintiff IN
transactions the zrouDd Of the -say If 5oe
actors and ta, on the a the Jaoss bad promptly ebuk-d
plaintiff BY establishing doctrine sUd ,lqios hin out OF
with dgrsce When, in fact viii b- shDSn il de-
i,udsn,s Who avsrd themselves II decion Of the Court Of
bnown 70 every lawyer and publshed 5,h Sci
the syUno Of the s,ty Of the traD..ctDps while
plaintiff desrous II ve,xat.rg the
The whole is nutshell Plaintiff, consiieins himself
gTesiy BY cenc certain aud
falling obtain Gsctiou mad the sHdseiy prosecute de-
feIoanis With vie Of eclg the facts AID IL event vi
showing them IN the and obtaining such recovery the
entitled him As the stood wh.n this
Court II Apeas had deed.d that transactions o this
lie e. aid void and that the pincp. and lis
broB er the former bad zs which the latter bJUud
sort OF Dred words
ihis The Transaction being g plsiutf had remedy
sCarst cebd for rreL of dty, vpoAtu Of Instructions
appropriation # hi. funds other condue-, but t~ay
whou' ecy IL Is supposed def~Edsut. ignorant
of tbs dsis'o this a-oe-' Whether
D w BE- that they sysed themselves Of the trial
20 s,if- iIvesiga:ioc-
We supposed ,hs, the of this suf
fcep;ly dferelt from the decided ~ enable plaintiff
trior, the COr .s uer AID ~ that -rd sn-
ell efgis rec,ed the a We unceooc defrniso,s
who IL Court would b. examined AID from them
eIsnnsu ascertain toe scts- which they s0uc
could furnish tie hole before the
Jury obtain d-cisoa its merits But here
with mott . plaintiff having
re.yd part Of hi. dsposf shogxh under potes
deemed sa;ctiCn ard f1her that the d1
vGIy principle from those the above mettyued
th rrflr. I'D, "a. plaintiff had remedy or rgh; Of
etir cffeucaBts event The
by the Court and h inquiry into the o the case
and q the transactions qae<tog eyaded rruo.
taken from Jury 50 that Il wa. defudat.
psnff, DO sought and did eys f s H..
fy Of TIE trsnaaens eyaar PqnstiHy And W, am
th~ party assaled dishc and the
the deeply injured party VIA, go.s p.ryef.a Of
isczs,