Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1859-10-14

nee on Canons TO ascertain, Grst the pr3pne'y o. Wv
passage Of any legislation the subject and u So ~ w
;-rnine whether The canon proposed was me P'ps
H.. however accepted she amendment 10 feef ''c
10 n Special Committee c;.,,
Of ave -,
uIh was ,har Joint Committee be raised for the pur
pose OF G.crg:aninz whether some better arrahseen
could not be made regarding the place Tor holding the con-
.cr.ton services H. az tia, 81 which We had s morning
lad notice lie said the arrangement had been aae
somewhat; suddenly, aud II ~as po''!'e '' 'no'e SAN
. factory arrangement could be MADE
Mc Conrad q. Va said he thought the pre.''hs b'hSp
hal the r!s,t 70 fix III" place OF ContScr"u1" A"et e
should tirs pror- Iwouli lie he;;e' therefore - azure.
i,,.r e. ill., rt.,iInr Bishop asking OF him whether u
would no. be eypcrIi 10 make soaie Du!et
Rev. ~. Cl-rc offered, a. an anenanrh'. ~ mi.
communicable: to the presiding Bishop the wishes %
Iour TIA, - services ot should be he!i Il!
The iGeren, churches Of she city.
Rev DR.. M-han accepted the G@ouihthN'h
Rev b. Andrews, Of Va believed that The place "As'
rot the choice ~ tie i"u-e Of Bi.lg"rs' Ina,
Rev pr Mead sail the House 81 BISHOPS Srrr sV..
Shines flabc, and ha, they had neglected u" nn.hs ,,
arrangement read the Eunr!c. Which contemplate '.
tie should he held In ehnLeh I've
would ld"p; resolution that the House rsnii.1 '' "
Rev. Fathers that they had forgotten tie Rubr.S.
Mr. Stanley. Of Gala though; Il Wa proper NAV
:a: such .o!erl service Ike hi. should be held IN ir
midi: Of , 'nultuous ma, Of aud boys Tie 'tp.",
square would he filled with hoy> hrn. crackers az" "
women selling cake.
E,r pr M.uurrrroi- said the presiding Bishops had !"'
ro,r ,h. CONCLUSION until is morning. bni "' Az '
plc.> N'It could hty" been selected WIS w wv ''
r:gnie. Il would lee Impossible 20 max me ht'!
Arrangement, for celebrating the Lords SuPr'' Nh '''
holding she rcrHivn services
Mr. rry,vr, Of Va. glad 20 See u - 'h'. va "I
one opinion IN Ills lIo.r the prorFicl ~ a." !A'r
w, mad been selected lie wished that the resolution
,ui hr ,rorr 60 A. to expires. the sense OF TIL, House
VA. xnrI,n, 10 hold the Co,ccrstion Service. IN
Church That ~, al We could do I! the presiding hh
OF. adhered 10 Ls determination We hah on! - u 80.
Re-. ". N,-"n, ~ y. e, offered ~ al" "''s''''' "
following regulations. "
Rived, unanimously That the rrc'iin: Bishop he r.
.p1, 4nT,sT H.t
tr The Gon.rr,,!un O. the bishops elect AMI ;at one 0!
norc Churches lee selected for The CoHsvctAi'.
Rev DR. Mahan aid ;iri would be a'cr'.hr 70 MN S"'
he. il.rct re- ~IT-H ihc resolution he had pt"i"''I'
Rev Dr. lankrl 81 :. G.. offered sn amcrdhrtt % t"r
effect sa, in the opinion Of this House hold ne tgL.
Grafton services in the place proposed ""In be III ''
sion Of the RGbric on ihe subject.
Rev Dr. Hawks said the Presiding Bi-hop had the r'Th'
10 a., order in reference to the conservation .. Bishops
lie mad taken such order Was 10 expressing
,Ar o m liou>" no, 10 Imply upon him. lie
thought the PROPOSITION Of he gentleman from H9'''
G,1Iu, Rev pr Mas"n) would look respectful o.
o.r part would have all the effect that any e1yrv'>Nn
OF tbs House coCi have
Rev Dr. iI.rr.cl withdrew his amendment.
Rev Dr Van Ingen, Of Minnesota wished TO amend the
.uIentl,E, rir gentleman rom North Carolina by
sir, ing out more lie believed ;heEe Was very
general si, tia. the CONSERVATION services should be ec
in place lie preferred 'a' iheg should be held ia
r c,,r suggested HAT Tier. va, difficulty Ia n.
.I.ec the :nt the Sairrte' " . Clutch "sIs
sI!".
had .;ooI The same pressure HAT they would be suJecIrh
t. tomorrow aud again FOR thirteen year, tie hai
since ;sc Meeting til, Convention c0asuied the AT.
r.,c Of the building, sL had been informal ~ him. that
humanity speaking the gaierie. could 10: s'r way under
an, ~, n; whatever II impossible Tor she galsrir.
10 give ".iy unless the hGil ling hsei cane do"u
Rev lI Van Ins-n pressed ;!ir amendment offered bJ
Mn stating many reasons Why the services Of Coniecra'
tiuu should be held In one place.
Mr. Yrrsrr .! Mis- should move Tia; the subject lie
:.r he mon rn I,i on tie table lie had within few
minute, held conversation Nth one or Two Of ihr Bishops
;c.r opinion the decision VI the presiding BISHOP
a,I ,v,tiIr I,,lf inside
In re; he supposed the subject as no" ""def '"i-i
,"raon the House ~ Bishops.
The notion To- !.y ;!.e table was not agreed 10
The question i.rn on the amendment o! d. Van
Iugeu 10 tie resolution Il Dr. Mason.
Rry br. Mason modified III, resolution, So as !" instruct
H., clerical aud lay Deputies .! Virginia TO cal! on he
presiding bishop and ioFrn Lin: Q! he wishes ~ ii.'
Kew pr Co, ,louged t,r several .ay, so ;c noble
sry 81! ,tcer, in his body, and e hope lac should now
b.. IL ar! Tor moment. lie would MAKE announcement:
sot pU; end 10 ;i' discussion lie "a, authorised
- =, venerable colleague, Rev DIR. WYATT Hho had pre-
III. over III. rheEatiO. u! ;s body lot - Esny years.
to ~ the PRESSING bishop, through him. ~!'hiEsx'
hr n.tr sent from him iii, morning.
III the resolutions M" subject were Then WITHDRAWN
Mr JAIME, : Johnston offered ihe tcloSinS resolution,
which adopted
Eeo!yvi Ika, /, be referred lie Cor,r;;cs Canons
consider the eNpeirncy o, 20 altering Canon VII 81
-. entitled 20. iss.,au; Bishops, :.s 20 limit the light
u: every DIOCESE having al Assistant Bishop, TO single
vie in the Howe OF Bishops upon my question.
motion ~ Rev. Dr stevens, the Committee on Do''
til .a Foreign Missionary Society had IraSs 10 at during
tie s.,s.un y: ig CuHN -i;.Dt
ARTICLE VI OF TIE CDNSTlTt TIOS.
Tie hour ~ l. having arrived the order 81 the day vas
called az, hr the proposed amendment TO article VI o.
lie Constitution The article n 1t now follow.
'AGr VI. The mode II trying Bishops shall be provided
Is e General Convention. The Cour; appointed for that
pun shal be composed 81 Bishops only In very Dio'
c.s, hc mode Of trying PrrSytcrs ai D"acons may be
Instituted hy the Convention % the Diocese. None bu;
Bishop ,aI pronounce Of aimonon Suspension
~ DEGRADATION from the ministry. any clergyman VIE
Their Bishop rTr-hyter or Deacon.
The propose! AIei.a,~n, /, strike on; IL. Above sr
&C. ani H. insert in lieu thereof - follows:
"Asr. VI The mode OF iry!ns Bishops shsl! lee provide"
Ir tie General CDnvsOu ~" Ccur. appointed FOR that
purpose shall COMPOSED OF Bishops ONLY In every Do
rr,r the mode Of Ring Pre.byers and Deacons may be-
Instituted By ;h Convention q the Diocese, hut the Gene
raj Convention may establish Court OF Appeals or ihe
revision NJ decision Of he Diocesan CouEt, None but
Bishop hall pronounce scitrGc. ot admonpn suslra'
- or degradation from tn Ministry, any Clergyman,
whether B-hop irsLyter " Deacon Such Court OF Ap
pcas revise the Determination OF any question ~
fact
me discussion upon the proposed "men!mcn; was con
nuci NJ the hour of adjournment, report ~ which
Si appear In tomorrow > paper.