New-York daily tribune., 1859-01-10

Caurt held hat The Jsdss s-iow.urd his oAsr- se
~; ne. Il. -. ..s.ss. sss ,sss .ssss so :, S..:
bssp committee she h,en. wsts % ss:s~r ire. N en-
ssn.,,sy sy act, ssa cs, ..ssS. n SSsa - rS
soDd s.,be, n,sui sn< the intent eh~rd In 'he ne
snd entering in ~hh soea. k-p os nse sss A<
dspo., Tire proof M, showed breaking ana .rten ho.ed
:,ss.; ~si's room Va. store n -sS lns. s,s. S.r
for al. t.osii bat mere % 'inss. oe u s Beard
fer ,heir sa p.s woali hsTdly Do say Ills s
ofc.I II S." se.sp;ioH @ and Of s,'o, .ssa
oren.e, snd that the material and sos sss 10
Sisr, gsrs.d new trial shor'a b. ordered
flNIspkENr FOR coSTLNPr IN 1HE DfsCRftioS oS
IHE COURT.
Pstten ast CrsIe.
Tbs is An anpsN from order 4. CoftnD,fs cecy-
in, an ss.inst Ms T. copnsh for no. psvins's
plaintiff repaired BY pr.vios. order n 'sresn, 'h ha -
so .a. an ..hSsn, the debtor having proved ss.i
ctoy ba. she ~, bot .ee 70 esp smh ,ns osas' ssae
ss and decided tea the application punish desor was
sassd the reton ofthe Judge Th- rsceyr s.s %.
her tab. the ordinary to recover The el".
EXCLUSION OF kvIDEscE-PARrsERssP
Baron 4 Taylor as;. huutrg'on ct a.
On the trial Of this eaess plsnus PROVED .ns s ~
groceries aud sgSr The dsfcpd.n' BODY 0ssrsd N s,
sl Ss ss T 1 reIrs'1s "i,S ,s .as
Bed have effected tie sonsrss.
Sf5. s'sSls;!s: sssi %iis ..ss.:
s s e. ;ais .s V' r.. S ssA
purchase aud delivery Of the GODS that thu rcods were nss
The OF the Judge charge that there evds4es q
sas si VS.. ~ nes.fy TO o. b. "a.
the fr% .ud not By Body Tse s1e.a ~s' not wa'se ~
The, question properly rn to the jury Tee jpds"sse
should BE- affirmed.
PRoor ny SUBSCRIBING wIrsEss.
Jones ast Underwood
This was an appeal from a Judgment on verdict
assignment s.t.ed by subscribing witness. bst tho wisssss
called p-ove execution vac h sescncs duly e.
The Couit hsd-F,t: TIA: to .essa '.'''ss-s" tbe
r, h.. sssys been well settled IN Il, s;.s .sse
a.: 'hi s.rss % ..sse. sss Ss E1ss'' Sss s ~.
M & .,d c;S 81 s.asIa. . "a .%c. m,ss: M:
there doubt - to the rse And relaxed - 70 nss
second Tss N. charge the s~ which allow. psrse. v
b. doe. not alter Tie & nor sasrs - Any re.'ss % s ~.
adversary for evidence disin witness -
this case the defendant not pr'snt n the ehecuon. ss
other sn the sssnor who therefore, bad eli the bias
rRAcTIcE-AyswYR lsD DExURRIR.'
struv.r sst. Ocean Insurance Go.
Held that when party answers and denurs 70 the
count cause Of action, he must elect wheh ne ss
stand hy. Order sppesled nom affirmed With costa
ArPEALs- EffEBsEs fIsDIs1s.
Lssack sst. Raymond.
On appeal from the verdict OF Jury on tbs reports
Of etoIss. To. Cot will dnIb their nsips on aaes-
on q face ard un. clearly .::1 the w..ss 81 .,sSsr s.,:
nnic, Of s.mo6y end wis N ,s.,i1
be sksn Judgment S .srasd % = IA co',. -
SETTLEMENT UPoS WIZ.
Gould Va vand,rvort, nc.
The p,a,ntff being owner of u easebold iuterest
ssgped 70 his brother who, In Ju 1852 conveyed !" Nc
Dubois father Of Mrs. Gould tie P1,s 'rs.;G: ,s:: e. any so.Ts "
oon,r rsn of 6s,. love and Affection conveyed the Prop
s sy 10 b. SS:a % Mr. SS to as sr ~ ss
and with remainder 70 hr children The c.nts nov
sS esns f''tn th.. II. ntss;"n Of :. the pais.
to secure tho ,rcmi:s h ,hs n.@s ?, M. E
ssned "a an inaDcon d: sei. Term om Which -
The coat decided That the did show III. ..s,.os
ndsd for by plaintiffs that there esitense -, any
the .ttsaspt on NJ. Could was eomp,- sna the Dslna
lad right with the proposed dealings with tbs
Order rsveusd and rune.lon dissolved with costs.
REFEREES FisDISGs -scHsAPPs.
Carter szt Roberts
Defendant sold to plaintiff ~ Of sohnapps out
commission and ts9 in store which he rere- found 90 %
'ss . ss S s
other sde sccorisnoe with tn. ce and bow my
price s:s whh would have Sssn
% s.d be. s. si qts sb T % ~. are
TO s .hy the Ier.s dd no. .ow fo tho 2s os:,, .h
The defendant csurot co@pl.i, of this A.smins The
has found tho facts correctly there no error IN the fe
dsusts adopted by him. A. be has allowed 10 q, nsses V
the Psiina Of the reeP' no, proving what va:
represented unnecessary to consider what w IN. effect
:po n. 10, So II. Court r
The referees should have .sed the facts fosei ssd ths
Go; HUT .st Boom.r sKsu, s; jcnu.on ~. WhseeS, a.
correctly,
the Court nterre with his nfrEs unies eeary
the weight Of evidence u direct violation Of soss
rule Of lew. davis ss Allen, Cons '6s) Jnd<meusS
armed
IN CHAasERs-JN s-Before Iu3fe purHERLtsD.
THE GRrAT TRUST CASKS
The case growing out of the affairs Of the Oil
American Trust Banking Company y-stcfday.
appeal from decision OF referee the taxation Of cos.e
When the lately before the Court Of App.a at
Cot usds certain provisions with to cost la obedsens?
which the Court made orders referring the ssverN
bills fees and disbursements and Of II. parties
ard th,r counsel Z, Alexander W. Brdfofd % tsx and
sdust the tn. decisn Of tho referee 70 BE- Nsa
appeal taken within days aer wftten soce
oft ID Of sppe the sierse Wa tected - Ispors
the facts To the Court bis doeion foe Of 900 was
directed o be ps,d hin, IN lies Of Siem
ssrnss before referee and tbs bills OF costs
put D and testimony aten 10 tnen.
The ssses,e Il claims presented exceeded s2o1o rae
rffeee 6ss a the Items, r,dsriuf tue total ID
sboDt eI20e0 Fr bis decison eppcss we're tAsen ~
nearly ell the parties interested.
The prtucys Of legal interest involved torn opp
TIE conoon various statutes the snsrrt of eos Toe
bls back OF them 70 the of hs m
ss.iop es twenty years sine During ina rroa
tered by the Code AID the question sses 10 respect
the various which statute shA thsse "
u3sd' There TO- Of course much dputs also a. ~ u pro
priefy of the various charges, IN sroan, ks .
NJ Dormsn B. Est0u. Sauaei Bsf;hfofd, Tnoms' -
Power Mr. Marvin John V9se aod othsr counsel were 10
sitet dance The argument eobunaed to-day.
DECISION.
TIE People er rel. FehY Duffy agt. Charles u.
Spicer-ManSsmus retrrnabe 18th ins-
SUPERIOR COIRT-SyEcIAL rEsM JAN. s.-Hefoye