New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-11-21
LAW LNTlELLIG.E.NC.E.

MARINE COURT-Noy. ls.-Before Judge hccARrHv
SUIT GROWING OUT OF THE MOUNT ykRsos BALL.
TIaughw out Nieo As. Dion Bourcicaut-
This IL an action TO the of $3.50 for tho
use OF chandeliers and gas fixtures the Academy Of Music
The plaintiffs formerly sued Mr. Uan Tor he same claim hs
hsnE s,sss opss Honss Is ppSsSssa o. sss trial s
bis and the Court gave ludsmsH ioi Che de-
ssed ne. Mr. Bourccat called on hin 70 engage he chan
deSr and gas and thu. they furnished and charged
sons furnished similar articles charitable purposesfor In
the ball Ohs Fire Dependencies always received h
the other hand Mr. Bcureicsalt testified that whom h
a upon 's s r . .s ne ION
entertainment charitable purpose andthst he Boarcsut
sS ws sRf S i III ss dssssp s' ss
Of the transaction and he expected TO be called for
Mr. Fowler the defense conended that when Mr. Bour
% gave q 4 nS r. b.
AGAINST him on the evidence being sgosy balanced oath
The Cour, held that the second ground well aksn sad
rendered judgment for defendant.
SUPREME coURT-sPEcrAL Txss-NOv. is.-Befors Jussos
boswoKrH
THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AND THE PHESn BANK on
YORK.
The People Of the State Of Mchan s The PhsnIz Bank Of
New York
The charges in the complaint that after the pas
by legislature of Michigan the Of 1881 au.hor
re- 70 Ssn go s as y %
Bsnk ofhe River Raia ard Farmers and Mechanics Bsnh,
Sss S1l ss% s
charged BY the PhOns Bank the State q MhIpn rhs
sedto pay IT, In 1910 the PhenI Bank authorized Charles
stewart claim with the the Banks against which the
drafts Settlements made with the MichiAa
Banks the claim for the amount OF the two drafts sM
urged against State OF Michigan. Tue validity Of the csn
s ssnsD sved 10 The q ssi % s
busDe settle private claims against the siaiefor he
same year the Auditors allowed the can, and ths
defendants received account from the State the Of
$4,000 a. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants did not fully
state the facts Of the case before the Board II AUDITOR that they
stated the contrary that the Phenx Bank had boon
repaid dollar After the discovery Of the facts In relation totba
General Of Michigan ths 9Th Of May 1885 demanded tho
money Of the defsndn,s which they refused pay This
ton then commenced the Superior Court OF this city and
the ~ It Special Tern judgment was Tor the pns-
fs Subsequently the General Term set the Judgment aside.
and ordered trial The tried before Judge Bos-
worth weeks and Saturday be rendsred ndsmons
Messts Howard and Jernesan plaintiff, Messs vsn
Wiakis and Cutting for defendants.
The following IL the opinion In the
oswoRrH G. decision Of the Board Of State Aoditos
Michigan made the I'd day Of Discomfort 1884,
10 the said Phrnx Bank justly and equiteby
titd to thu Of 5 a. for principal and Interest npou
the csi Of the PhenT Bank agans, tbs Stsse Of Michigan for
an advance 1880 State bonds delivered 70 John Nor
ton H. cashier Of the Farme and Mechanics Bank of De-
March 49, 1919 is contrary 70 Jaw, equity and good
COINCIDENCE and null and void having been procured by
fraudulent practices and eonceanen stated In the oQn
psata the said $500 a. with interest fom the 9Th
December 1884 the day when that In pursuance aud
saeton decision pad BY the pisiua. 70 the Do
TRe plaintiff. entitled Judgment seeorainsy. .ss.-s
sPEciAL TEKx.-Beforc all the Justices
DECISIONS.
Louis Janin agt. John b. Gray.-0rder modifeds
A. fo.tfk.~