New-York daily tribune., 1859-05-31

s J,sasr q n . shs fhsr oas-td ,A.,. y "a Si-,l.x
n = s, rs ,'ss ;.s s. q .s ~ ca y s,s',. s s :.
Tn rsN.s o.msscce ,.s ~. d'.s.sd .ui s'~t ssiaeel
ehs ~tsSw rea-ed sd bros M a' .e'oe 10 ~oes<
II, rsoss We. ,', tSs-, &c ~ih,s, J.sy wo fss~a
nsfr q hw ,As, N q ~ pis " s n,s
etuerr ror 70 any sas ,srs ssins' the ecf,ns e. a.
Tslnr snd u, the .rn. q iar >s3'io rd sae
:sa ;s2 90; % ;ae & ~ 81 . - ,a , s,, % ,.zz
sxestnd
l''h p.oress .ss r.-'ss 30 tJ ts. - . ~ c-nr.ss,
s,rr II h, rrL ed urt e,r6c ,- "a .s v
sa,d The is,A osrnber ssd p,.sss n "a
sse "a ersS i's To- III he r.sh Il srh s
HID tie cc,rorsan declared d id-.d ~Au-t seAs
.iLoarr BY he c 20 han ID Its stoA mies have &c
n,e.,sy Esquire '-tAes the svsiM f.rs tim,s "a ~
sih Nov, IA the pa ,Ho s.w % pas,.s .rJ nsa 70
d, Esd ;'seaas' & that y iae sss,,,os Of u. ssA
W. that ,hs '.ne .hosd b ro.sn.eS % ~ vssss r.s
g. tie Seerary wbcn nj received By ha uD>t sahs-
Ssd s-s .Sssa ss sss sspas,Ss e. ,s ~ Tia: ..
ty s.oc o. ,h.I sac.;ien nsh sis % this sssaea S
Pras fee say paI,icua rfiod esusuy
." Il. ~ me i si. 'S s V. :, d. .sS: s.
are cons, ofta pupcy whsp ,heo ~ "a. sirss.rs
ll os or progs y Of oorprssioa wsrs .aob ss rr.ss
n s the stockholders sEv estd TO an EQUAL ssr- 'ssAs
eclo sr .sss,r or .Srss poS USs the s.ss
sye III Decs pos,T DE riaips,e bvs-en hs .skAs
ei, 70 sssrp ths6 Tb. de-isus,on o. 6.csl y.ar hss
ntlns g Do grh she diSrbrou u Il, pseesd. ,s
cih ,ds the ckse teroE II b. pc pssy
and .hc ri sr 'asAus up 'hs s~t .nur,l
would sHke excisce 'oektodeE, ~he sbqusa ally selals1
rcm suIPus rmanns scI the ssidea ~s,tcehncd
Is uos ven r.ccs.sr, SO pnrc. III. appeal invoke
ss $40 OF he-s pnc,P By ihe ,.m, q the rsa,,s i.
then holding stock. without any airrinslnsion
oot II tie srrs earning, e the rcd ending h pyss
jsa 9Th wa. no. ed as the ssck dividend ~s'. ~ tsss
wS wsS t1 ssr n .s.s sssJ 70 Ts sSo.s. %S" sS..
they AL who held when the tesouin psssei ~
vinrssy set Of The ossndsus ASA he enIiss 70
didspd hi. stock Under h rsaon jas ss nacs
OF cospay d,.rctioesry power .. to whom the, ~si
pay Sd.n % 70 70 M They %, P e 'S s,a, ~" ID sVsss sss
osas 10 DO no, @ Tie PERIOD the others have no Iss. 70 =
ertitd ,hs r-,o the when The dydens ia doc.a A.
the pland .cthd.r br books Oftbe eampsny d.
dUdsud tAs p.len a. Pssd b. ae Bard OF poss
Oh the ina Of Dec, lseo
Where the aiyid,n dccnd so IN, book. AZ opened
There the oneers nst De sNeei ~ h on. - tey cs-s
he Lime they csd. aud ta- distribution IN sds soo1
The view, abovr expressed dispose Of this appeal AID rsas<
trsl nroe-ssy IL therefore not requisite sh ~
Examine the other qas.oa "a tbs esss VIA. sos.s
stock any time, u the cxclusoa Of oae" no sse
The QUESTION no. h-e from difficulty inaeS -
the opinion that the Board of Dcts tsd NJ power n"s 70
unish the Vslc o the ck but ns~ G must be orderc
irsin tOm ssPressDs any further cpinoa heroa sss
Pesntiiue ,,,
New tlai Vfusicd cstts 70 au.lee'Nh
Gsrdper p Andrews sduni-trsso Sc, OF Bisn,hsd. ~.
Frsucis b. wsllsse. administrator. Ge. Of sairchid
IsoR,uAN J.-Iho question submitted TO IA on this
o ny the validity q No claim ~hcn disputed ~ The
sdmnrator Tie ssnosss 10 hi. y. ss iasf -
tSis a. C 5.ars '1S ''''''' s''''' '' -
r,ss- hU ued powers 10 nshe ths Investigation .. tods
pd claims but of those ~ ends TO csse hke to
,rt fp X. I'd n. q
livrn to bat thai where the excutos
ssS ts % pps. 10. hs The debt to S@ ss
,be Ls dr,es putd |, deey shs y'ii,y ot sas
pgsu'. tcei.l only seple. % th.' que. ion.
10 "a yO RS p lS? SCI rs lihe Pows, sSsu aer asA
hut may ell be doubted whether sueh authority even these
,is, ~ the validity q os winch ",y roe'tsd ~
In "a vol i1s the royi.,on. g. rst'cacs of fa:p..4
under be conto Of tho Sof.ose fs Ia such e.se. ts
snd Ii. r ,s:s pr.coed adsaen, 10 thar Coss
beGrc se surross,e act In aiectins i,s payment.
the T.Tsnesni merely hold that pssdns te,ro the
rse on petition Of creditor 20 aasp.te Il '.s
Deeessy Involves an sss@na,ioa a. 70 The Validity Of :ss
G s. "rass ' .i hs G but as ho ssss
oD hot binding upon tho pe and only coaonded The
creditor o BIZ sppsn o anticipate tho p.yments issvias
lin s action st law to enforce the debt dbputed By ths
The case Of Kidd ss, Chapman. Barb. c Rep 4A 49,
adsmsn, ssns. o s.isor and the decia n th:s
% ] s.s ss BE-" S o S n W.on 90 Bs H. ss s s
n.
10 bsro h.p Se ,hs % ~. .na. -
snstice Brown Then hn tha, Va" sosa,e NM no
take eoghiza' CO oi disputed c'A" Oh 70" sPpos"n " -
cfrdinr' 80, ~ n, "a.
In hsfe', adm, dc sN seoder U baio o y hep p OS
the 0cn.rsi Irfe Albany hd cxprs tht he Sariossss
hso no power 70 decide upon Tho sdy Of o Hsns ss
estate when such claim disp1ted by The executor IN. -
examination Of the qucs,iop BY Justice Harris
81, rrudor any further discussion th. tns
IL Dissygy Admir- aat tn. Bark Of Wsshnstop ~ Bari.
RIP 60 th" .'ne doctrn" was held By The Moare .s-
ssu,e Only srpy 10 undpa,ed claims. tha, Lsos.
IN. nd.d that power upon tho Validity of dste
cls oe agsDst 4 .houd remain sscasIvy