New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-08-25
LAW INTELLIGENCE
SUPREME COURT-CHAMBEss-Ausust 2L-Bcfore Justice
NGRAHAM.
FAMILY DISPUTE.
In re- Elizabeth Tebou otherwise called Elizabeth Bullen


SeRAHAN.
FAMILY DISPUTE.
In Elizabeth Tebout, otherwise called Elizabeth Bullen
Robert Weber of North Castle, Westchester Co.,
and the only Of Elizabeth Teoou who ie'den Of hs
last commission de iusaeo inquaeo was awsIced TO Henry
Nicol Charles Stuart and Livingston Livingston eq' 20 III
surr by jury the bsbitus drunkenness, Of Elizabeth Te
the 4h Of Jny last the coms 'ners found that
nropey II was uther found ;here remained to her fund
on pst amounting 10 $3.50 The pett1ner asked that ne
might appointed the committee OF the person and estate oil MS
In reply Mrs Tebou. that she married early III.
10 one Bentley BueD, wEo oed two aerwsd She then
Cumberland Ga where she became engaged to he
married James Lindsey who seducea her and vo!,s.d hi.
promise and by whom abe bore who was named Robert
tnosey and who hes subsequently, given himself The name OF
Robert Weber She subsequently mar ed to John reeon
In this city, She that Robert Lindsey has been the baps
OF life that size has frnshed bm with The means 70 com
trade several but he always unfortunate
finally that he and destitute and unable to support
Her attoucy made an affidavit showing that the
nent of the conmop testimony taken before fifteen jury
en that subs eueutly there only thirteen lie object
ed proceeding further the grounds that two OF the Jaymen
before whom the testimony for the prosecution bad been gwen
abseDt that one Of The JlTynen seI hearing sns
that case al that would make shor story Of it, that
jurors objected saying that they not TO be hamsussed
by Jucge EdmoId other udte that the were
inssated By Of the jurors ana huas that the
oyerru.d the verdict rendered after the
defendants counsel had lett the court
The mother is "a years Of age and the son 81
The delivered the following opinion denying tae motion
to confirm tbs inquisOn: -,
~
inquiry in this The proceeding IA one to deprive party
and management OF her property ara IN case
Appears that notwithstanding the Allegations against
she hes been able take of and increase the amount OF
money in toe bank. 49,.
Where jurors such rcuiston than are
absolutely Necessary and the proceeding Is cooimcnced before
all think irregular discharge part Whatever number
the nqu ton the should be continued before
all heY not all present. the Comssone should have
till another day There room 10 sup
if actually against The responds
that here aud attention given ~ the case
prou situation Of the respondent has rish 70 ash IL
Al uch opinion previously formed operated against her,
Their can doubt that she should have nes tral
The motion the iDqustion Is denied, and new tfAl
is ordered befcr the same CON Inissiolers
Daytn and Todd petitioner John W. Eiuonds for re-
sp1ndeLt. -, =, Nv AZ
ton granted on Jacob NJ Weeks ming bond with
,lretv approved by Justice to the psirn e In
cs,e Of recovery II this action $780, =, 81.
James S. Siurges ast. VIM. w. White.-Motion de-
John A. Stewart, Receiver ct al, ag'. Chas. Coop
er ct sMoton for leave to Discontinue granted on payment
OF costs after issue. -, =.
Mercedes G. Montablsu sg.. Bertrand C!over.-Mo-
ton d. ried. MI.
John Van Opstsl agt. Henry Leievre.-Moton
granted