New-York daily tribune., 1859-06-30
THE DOY TRIAL
C..T.s,.1e~r.- 4 Il. =. L., p.ss>rt.
Nm

C.Y.r,,1e~r,- 4 u. =. L., D.sz>rt-
sT. JgsfFH. No. Js1e q l>Jf.
The boy ,iisi 9. elossi, sbi Df. JOIN by hS-sc
guilty srd sel.enc.d - fge y-s7 n .hs Psr-srt-gy.
TO .sy Ia. .Dch II IN u tIe JGry g. oc'fsZs
and oyen ylz.sh Of t-s eyrtshcs 10 tLs c1se sgsy
Md s1pr~ssou 81 be s-1s. u syery Cgy,sj St4e>f
snd ghi, aiiDisd W. s,,ena71 IRE iy:nsf tbs
Tie sIi'.,,nyT r. ? from re Jorrnal of IA. e'y:
T. s.sis 80 fra - Cef- h-fs~isa -ss ass -
- =, - S-.s..r-.. -. 49, .. ~. -se-
Sssn. ~ iap-~ar~1 r. H-l1, -sr -, - --@g-- =
s-rtts - ls~ & I'D al - ,-ry w. s-aas1
ssssrI ssF-s d. rsss,f .sf - - iel ~, af' a
,Esi - ts1 trr ~rgsssf !, - ssts-- - fs - - ~
l-ro,Ils Ia ,-r1-y N a. C or "a u. 1, 80
ss1 0..r >>as~,.s--' se,sa h9a ..r.s-s ~ ssa-i
ia,o ootg1l-er ria - tDg- l',srls. oss1s-1 -
sfolE .1-nl- f.f - , ?. "a .-ffe = - .fs4
sstss ~ s-ti>l1e - : .; p .'@-.- f4f1f - 80
10 pfsl-i 81 Ff,.shy aass e. ssait p. -s'- - 49,
TsgsT-.s " "a h-Pr-na- Cg.f-"
The ,esiIDOpy i, 10 smDgu' the .sHs-Juy, H.ygr
WoDd EE- y1e-.L'. III D--,.Dlgny ngfs isg TaD.s
than bic .taIlsIt real before. Iet ne J13ys make.
the above Rev ming. Anf here psr,nt M o. 81
that while dsL1gbce The a1gye Ess destruction ~ .e
Judge | . VI rIy thG, ~ ~ d-csi0ns, .Esfrgc afd
rulLgs before were strictiy iT,.rt.o Ibe bs.ei y.
Doy, and b.. stsieLeL-- q VIA, ks had dJne and
would do, made 1-e u ~ cOIyic. h-n were given a.
testimony By who. 10 the homes belief oi . tie
reporter u -. (Jfuer III a. psrurei himself, he only
b-Lg abe - remember part of sEs, D0y -si, an1
all those portion u DOys remark ,trgaZiy aga -
him. At thi- ulsl be Tss cDnveIleI-ly sb.sni, snd
h.- teffImoIy. prInet IN % ne ne Fs0apers,
u-ej-the version bsiag meag@r. aoi MT sAJTag -
mar iucOnslstsLcses and cyliraictiJGs tank The
council iJI The d.iense mate sJrOr n agreeing -
receive the report e h te.tDCuy offered for none
Of tie evidence was taken tosn by thoroughly
u lied reporter.
The Iiemoranda spoken Of % the above extract,
not proven % oe D0y nor wa there anything 40
il tb., shpuld properly have iIhlsncsf jury.
The ch4'gs against DR.. boy sa-, tha, he enticed
the raye Dick frJ Il the STATE Of Mlssoar TIE eyi-
dence faded ~ shDg ths; Dr.. D0y wa ever 10 the
State Of Missouri; while i; cOncl11iysy proved that
the boy Dick e;' Missouri with pas from d. master,
allos ing him ~ DO -, and tina, john boy never saw
him until arr he reached Lawrence.
Further cJmmen; i unnecessary the who'e trans
action j. a libel upon the freedJm Of an American crl-
zen in open violation Of justice and only pa'a!eei III
the ELg gIsh state triaie IN Ireland.
II the Supreme Court Of Missouri does DO grant
trial they deseTye the execTE-i0n Of every nones
hear and uDprej1cic-d maa; bat csnnO, thiak the
highest Court 4 any Sste could De glly % 20 great
Injustice re1se trsl, with the features o
tins fairly before them.
Had tie zane force Of reporters been present in the
Court-R on a. on the fjrmer rial, do ~: believe
he would have been convicted, nor that the J1fge
would have granted the ne instruction. But we all
felt confident that he would b. acquitted, there
lsss e1cremen; than before. Tne result plainly shows
that even Slavery 10 her sronghOds fears the tree,
un znu.eled pres If the cOuo'TY
The citizens Of Kansas feel jasty indignant and if
boy goes 20 Jefferson Cry, slave property 90 the
boTGeI viii be unsafe than ever. This trial, II
adverse in rs results gi breed more m iergronnd
railroads than the sigh. Of Slavery could 10 ten