New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-04-21

dong 81 sooner by professional engagements nave
no recollection Of there being more than one paper
n has b. en- stated there some cards ana cara
ease: have DO recollection; there were no'i thers
was paper which il IN the envelope sun;
IL under 10Y control; ] have Wh 10. "oSa s
II in the possession Of Mr.. Howard Of Baltimore;
40 that nothing should be left 10 the contingency OF
nv Absence; Charles Howard being IN the room, oy
request delivered toe paper TO Witness who, ex1mn
inc II said zee this envelope s addressed 10 Hon
Mr. Pendetou from Dr. Miller, in pencil, and " Lett
with Dr. Stone for delivery it ia the same envelope;
this the same paper which was In IT, and tne same
card from DR.. stonei this envelope contains some
cards and scraps Of paper; If any were eft oy DI;
Miller presume these are they, bat don't know 1
repeat have personal recollection az 70 the csrds;
don't know whether they were previously IN tne en-
yelope not; cannot ssy ponuvely
NJ Brady-May l ssk the character OF your feel-
ings. Was il not one which naturally excited suohs
emotions A. -,
death | DO not think any spoke TO me aoont VS.
ting Gray's honse Mr.. Jones was fflend oil the
family and myself, and ne accompanied ne a. my re-
quest or suggestion; nothing belonging 10 MI hey
was found by us at the house; i have no kno"ieues
az to the pay Of the rent except What MI Gray tod
Mr.. Brady-Do you remember this slip of paper
necular in shspe and which appears TO be the bot
tom part OF a letter., With the signature TO 1t
Wi.ress-I have seen il since / returned to Wash
rgton, last week. my impression however Is mas,
ceived from DIR. Stone 10 Mr.. Howardj believe
nothing IA lost. =,
MIR Brsdy-I want TO show them TO the prisoner.
After showing them TO the prisoner, Mr.. Brady re-
marked that Mr.. Sckes desires 10 say that these
cards containing names of lsdie. and gentlemen OF
known respectabty be has no desire to read as they
are in no way connected with this case On tAe CON
trsry be objects 10 il. Tbs envelope addressed TO
Mr. Pendeton is immsteria AS to this slip OF paper
we SIMPLY AK to take the name and address, 80 tnit
we may inquire whether il has anything 70 do with
the case. Note by Reporter-This bears lazy
name. -. 80.
Mr.. Brady-But we want to look at this letter.
which il in cipher.
Mr.. Carlise-Put il into the hands Of come person
that we msy get the key, snd make copy OF II.
Mr.. Brsdy-When did you first learn that Inc lock
had been removed
Wi.ness-J hesri it in Court; the other day a re-
mark msde by one Of the counsel Tor the defense
with regard to the SUPPRESSION of evidences desire 10
cav before leave the stand, in the most positive ana
circumstantisl manner, that gave no intimanon or
direction nor made sny suggestion as TO the removal
az the lock nor did hear II bad been removed anul
heard it in Court; and say further that any ntims-
ton or charge that any suppression or attempt OF cup
preston Of important or unimpOrtant evidence mao
been by my participation or knowledge, by whoms2.
ever made IT, msy be permitted to say, UNANIMOUSLY
| false. Slight epplsuse.l
Mr. OaldeYou spoke Of two keys. Do yod know
| what lock they belonged TO
Mr.. Brady-Are they the same keys We have pro-
duced
Witness-I have not seen Them show them-l
could identify them.
EaIse-Me
Mr. Brady--Do you know whether there has been
paid any rent, or for wood OF that houfe
Witness-l do no..
Mr. Brsdy-Do you know whether anybody under.
took to pay tho charges of that house
Witness-Ony what i heard from John gray;
have no knowledge, except vhst Is IN the news
papers, that Mr.. Key was IN any way connected Win
the house . =,
rrosecntiop-I visited the Houce in Fifteenth street,
in company of Mr.. Pendleton, on the Monday week
after the murders Gray mad tried all the DOORS sug-
gested 10 Gray he had better break open the door,
6ut Mr. PepdIeton thought it would be more dignihed
10 get in by the aid Of ocksnith; made an exaln'
nation OF the house, but found no property OF Mr;
Keys there; Mr. Pendeton gave no drectlousi pad
no attention to the taking off Of the lock. The witness
then further detailed the incidents OF their vsts agree
ing with Mr.. Pendleton's statement.
Mr. Brsdy-You are member OF the bar!
Witness-I am, Sir.
MIR Brady-You have been assisting the prosecu-
ton ever since the trial commenced
Witness-I an going TO answer your question, but l
want 10 understand though
Mr. Brady fnterruptiDsl-I don't mean TO complain
of what you have done; ask whether you have no.
assisted the prosecution in this case; don't say as
council. m
Mr. Csrlisle who said he was aware of the cases;
have not the least ability to hunt up evidence.
Mr. Brady-I intend to treat you with all proper re-
spect but to furnishing brother Carlisle with au-
thortes that is unnecessary. You have, MIR. Jones,
| taken III this case
Witness With smphass)-The very deepest inter-
| est: shall tell you why
| MIR. Brsdy-Not at all.
Mr.. CsIlsle-You were the Intrinsic friend OF Mr.
| Key
Witness-From early youth to the hour of his
! death. ,
| MIR. Brady-I never object to amsn standing by the
memory of his friend, as long as he deserves to be
Mr. OUld called az witness e1 Senator Brodhead
| The Judge snid he supposed Mr. Brodhead was ~
| his home in Esston, Pa.
| MIR. Ould, as MI Brodhesd had been subpenaed and
| failed to sppear ssked for an attachment. One was
accordingly directed against him. and several Others
| Mr. Brsdy-We want 10 look at that letter in cipher.
| MIR. Oud-We have no objection
The Jury retired under charge Of an officer and the
| prisoner was remanded and the Court adjourned.
Special Dspstch to The N. Y. Tribune.
WASHINGTON, April 20-l2:45.
But little has been done this morning. Mr..
Woodbridge was cIoss-exsmined till liz o'clock.
lie is bad witness, confused and selfcOntradicto
"; but bis material statements are little shaken
An attempt has been made to prove that Mr. Key
declared, only Fix months ago, that be held merely
paternal relstiOns to Mrs Sckles, and tina. on the
18th of February be said he was prepared for
emergencies. The evidence was excluded after
argument.
The defense still think il will finish its testimony
to-day. A few connecting links in the chain of
evidence to cover certain points only are wanting
| SECOND DISPATCH.
The defense rested at quarter before two this
afternoon. The ,agsciOus offer of the prosecution
to LET the defense introduce excluded evidence
tending to show adultery, including Mrs. Sickess
confession, will be considered in consultation of
the defendants counsel a. the jail to night There