New-York daily tribune., 1859-09-30
LAW INTELLIGENCE.


DECISIONS IN ADMIRALTY on APPEAL.
L.rrsbee at The Propeller Piedmont ,
have looked into this case, and am satisfied the
ury the brig W.; ., the % nIPsa , s TS.
a%oG have bssn carefully considered and
wm. A rrseborh E, al ss.. The Steamship Falcon
Decree Of Court belo1 affirmed.
Phelps ct al agt Brown ct al
There was IN the opinion IN this case puo-
shed Wednesday. Instead Of ne. trial being ordered 1t
denied The would 'how the error but It Is proper
itst the correction saould b. made
."r""'" sss Bo.wc.rSs- wTcs.,rSs-seDt 9-sef0' JUS
THE ACCESSORY TRANSIT cohPAsY DiFFIcuLriss-
The Accessory Transit Company sst Cornelius N Gnrson
cgment entered 10 this sc,on on the l3th ot
S. p report Of referee In favor VI the defsnist
uss. .bs 2i.t Of Nay. 1858.
OF this company 3s of May 1885, the 18Th Of
* s5s Of tho entry OF such
.I.o tDs s.tomey in ID. seton Of ,as .sid company.
The receiver pursuant TO no1ce dated no Hh
port Of the referee Of reference and r leave
pruce.d with such action on tns ooDd of In pro
before the referee and Of sud In obsnias such order
OF nee and entering said 5ent AID on the onsf sloun
orh the Psps ery,d or to such other OF 'aen idhsf
relief ss 10 the CeIt q l sem meet
there il 10 e,aa;y the proceedings before the ref-ree
far the form Of pfsesaaIs sone'rasd wGS D.a trs ,
day is from the tine Of one hearing 70 tha Of .aoshef
S.y essr,e .Ia usmis,ed the cause oa cb testimony
decided BY the reefe SO fI ~ regularity consists IN co.i'fm
us rh. proce d z practice.
Of ,hs rules procedue there departure
sho amoupuns esusny that can affect the Judgment
There fraud st:snios the order OF Reference 10 ns
sense that any srfcs deception praccsd BY The desnd
sIefree nor was tho referee Pfe'apy.y of
@r.l ntssny His poston respects which eoud possibly
exert arJ L6uenoe sei Known 10 all par lea snd
pe.umpiyey would be fsorAbe 20 the Company hs app t
saLorIsi by resolution Of the Company ~a'''ts
Itory TO ID. deisIa.It ana va. sesed oy tho Oh '''
haud in obtsiang such oeer uness II was pro
Sreoss ss iorm q INA befor, TOE ;.ryr
secure b. eolo.oE with tbs rser,e Or wh'a
u,ce il oosLt u be hs pAlh. for large snoa9t
No fac which tue, would idfbi.h motive iOf
70 Se,re ,uc result some of saspeiou
ra for d IN S D much s'%0.S S .SySn 3, a ba s
prove. .myy , a .gia'' ,Gt. 1s sr9alG. o. su.~.s .o
ssns. :s qq,'fIs % s Sai %h Tread ea .A. oon @ q
aver TO, IN his sc,in another thst Vanderbilt
said be ei, posd .e- 9th osnsor, ana ~As wins
settle with hum that III. bad sgs.a " Tas rs 81 y .ac
dmssd d. be tad sns CoGpsny would be laoe 70
Ch.slei ,h.s agreement with hn sns trsfecpp 'as
rehres Of .ns sait and TIC ass nsnt 81 "a,
Court on the referee LeP2 n' .rs s .d
vice ey Mr. White, even II IL be assumed tnat mf.
s .eeur.ey hat the terms ssrevd upon were, not
s,a,d They may have included an eHtnctloa oi zoo eA
q .5a s.v. .0 t..u n! S. ae @as .voI.s %
parry than report OF sbe Issree con1n~nI sa Az
rssuls reiefenee and 1 .i. would result "a .sse
hDs c.iu IN favor Of the Company more osIrn .i %
fhsv h t<Y
uct purIose aef aloils the s ad q
AID the Company BY al abuse of iSes
sa Ths should be gwen 70 the cee4hsu1rs "a
made gwen, unless ins eyidsnes o o,a.l .ne
no biOie Inconsistent win goo ia.'a ga :.
tones, purpose pt ofese senieen in respect
" Gsou male, ,dsvi: that the staten .n,s 10 Mr. Gree
rctss Of hs ,ss,lmoly hr. ns - Ter =. relates %
.sal of ths action eneUi thereof ." fA |" 4,
knox!edss extspas and cspo1spt vrriy NJ :,
untrue and fcUrdsiol bJ nls s.si say .-r i,
mean thar wholly untrue ms, tnse q, tss, "a. aus.
sn, sBe,d upou between him and Nande'S :" '"s' Ae
ecInsiss dsssn- ., 49,
The sci who conducted nc &c, eoncs,o, a.
hxfor, the refine sWeas taa, 20 iA - nc :.
..s cor o.py Il good faith, and uDdr me srstruc
III q, Of the Board Of Dnecors u sac company s
tsud or eousion win sAd o&ri son % ~ "a .
thst aid sse tot 'ns oons .ae pniS
AZ M snd fair .rs Of he natter N conirCvey Del ~o' =
,.,, and IN the us-A AID customary crse o. reference
-. of IKE Ntsr and ust be 1en oees~1 ana fs "
-. hs, he decided sic, conformity 70 tEe lsS AID Sc
n .b- cs,,. - prsssltsd 70 MIN aid r-tefeDcs
At y,rcsrbt 20 the complaint OF SnfJsr Ha "A
hfoust Nv sAndes Dlt ana tse sad CouP
ys. Ssd TIA aenies toe sueno nsdr y @i Du
usje, A. 10 an asssd se,lsaert bzvesn him aaa Cuf
t,1a.rb. Of tbe alleged oonJsrssslDA
sfd Mr ute q. any iue u tEs sLseeo r'tse
tsusor President Il the Aoessofy ft1si'
Tns a@eiarator G. IhiJc penOn H Sasi ne a.
-as,s!y porsd, Dot el..tled 20 Ereh
a,uee qcest Ike the present, eets~n " -
before Bot Mr. V1ptsrbi, o. Axes 80 a. =, 49,
of he matters therein IN ssd as,ris-A % 80 s.y
.feouL, Ths. ceporsut AsiS 20 OF " &c ~
mite, cry ese ths' o~ bad 70 sslea i s 49,, a.
iksrein with seid Oan'o ~ ~ 80 ,o. a..
Tlss. d,roasn. pov$r 70 DO Co. ana sD--a - !,
II troe-r insri,<e tlerewi,a ssf hs a.
PIe.s<.c, of said Company sfOfe'Aia' VINCE "' --
MAY ls5'. 1900. IF a.. .,i, ara III
.s. nov g. ,r.-r,.u. h,,1.-r hin and ava vi
r.t, -ha; sl,a sp-c1h>d pr cflssss u -
.rls.as xhlcA - sstsscs " ~ y''-lts'S~' '''-- v