New-York daily tribune., 1859-06-04
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPREME COuRr-CHsxsEss-Jy>E S-Sefors Jus.
SuIHErLASc.
Heary Watkins az. Harriet wsitins- d.

decree OF tyor sined ,s,ns, Der By bet hosbsai ar4ef
be ioo~ins cii alleged By Der andsS1o
manager a. Barrurn's Atsom, where Au Charles Howard
time M and Mn Watkins uho ben married .onr iScr
% I've years. that time RESIDED At No to'tn $50 ss
mother resiins The noC II Den PEI .~
Mr.. Watkins ~ens on trsysiins tour With Ms hos,S. ~
es'ne hi. wife and ,~o ehdre one sseS .s .n l.rsS
hat Mr. wsiin. returned the city in March l.s,,
were a; their rsience Mrs Watkins sred with pspr
which shs orna w summons and complaint By aet eu'ssaa
her; Mn wnkins showed this paper TO her husband sad
a.aed him vh, be eani BY charging her Si;h sces acts MI
ssS would panh An, oSe who asserted Mrss
kr aid 'he should give him The p.pef ,sa not eetSn ,a
would BE- very inEy with him toS making such crsaoas
sxan., Der ". ons Pan on e. part to 'e eo~ .ae Pss
Watkins gave her husband. who tresied aneT~s-a
jose: Mr.. wa,kia' continued TO 1--we VIII ss VIE al
served with decree OF the Supreme Sonl; dis1nins
sr n. roiy OF the cSfdrru from her sad giving
them 70 her husband Mr.. Watkins then scused aud re
swsy sor little while b.; when be back they woet live
happy oSeher hs, he trew she w,s n9s guilty OF siu.
Ws,sn. .pcrned with indignsto0 M Watkins theu went
psrruis 20 whom she s,ed the circumstances OF
o. Of The Court found hai during the the psrti.
yr together Mr. Watkins prosecuting the suit for divorce
complaint the referred take testimony
that on going before the resree ne only stns sianea & s
had several me. ,hIrs,rned .s NJ w ~ @ sS man
coming Of Mrs Wsiknss rOom under suspicious ,resn
this denied most ',.nuGnsy BY Mrs Ms'.a. s
sSS sSS sscvrd Mr. @Ds conduct s.yns ' her aSptes
ard hs bouen ,rts were but part deep plan
nd of her hs, instead Of him Il /. ss. .aseved party
informed and believes tha, her husband has been sy
The counsel for Ms Watkins obtained order from Justice
Sutherland commanding Mr. Watkins "a show cause why the De
The rr VA. rr,ursbe oday and the Counsel for Mr. Wat
kns stated that he had been deceived and imposed upon g ms
s.ds the diyorre The jadse papers and will .ee the
form Of order hereafter Charles d. Eysas, counsel fo Ms
Watkins.
Max Maretzek sgt Car tormes
The plaintiff has commenced sut against the de-
ndan damages claimed st S2o alleged to have
been sustained by hin in consequence OF OF con.
artist during the mouths OF January and feorsy
Defendant being nonresident the State application Of
the plaintiff Justice Sutherland granted attachment against
his property.
MOTION TO DISCHARGE FROM ARREST.
Norman A. Freeman sgt Seth NJ. Harris
This WAS q motion to discharge the defendant from
Mr. Harris arrested in civil suit for causing TO be
Character Of plaintiff This morning the Jace deuie tue
mttOn without COSTS and without prejudice 70 the nsn, Q, the
speedy trial the Circuit Edmond Bankmsn tot notion
Theodore " Baysrd ct al sst. Jerome B Fellows
This is motion for injunction and receiver. From
the the he send.R .ggts the S
casks Of gssSndy Pr sHs which % na s's va. s n to & &
t On he same dsy they delivered the defendant the
hou.e receipts Of NJ Dnsgs Co.. with plaintiffs order in
directing them TO deliver the quor the defendant
On the dsy flo~ins th. presented to NJ s. Drs
Co. and seeePed oy them IN written 20 aers n. me
delivered defendant written bin of sale dated sept
1857 .sned BY ,heu.ye; and stns forth m ss Jerome ss
wine called Busn port at forty cents gallon subeot to
dutie- smouutdg to sIo 90 for which payment WI" sc'
some Of this wiue amounting in value to 5000 aerwad
and me % now h rS. ~ ns b h Of
sale referred which contested by he pn'ihs they alleging
that the made merely pledge aud not sale
and the defendant Of the fact and had never paid
The case wa. bfoash 70 m in December 1851 and judgment
made Sutherland and receiver Tho
and ip October decision rendered the order
pointing the receiver Justice Sutherland ooncuns IN the
made before him for areoeivs the ground
that made the decision uon matters not argued
and upon ale cations and not stated in the former
papers in the ease Motion PsItialy Ssaed 4. ..,....,.
THE sEw-HAvEs RAILROAD CASE.
The New Haven Railroad case came up again, hay-
BE-. s9ds r., . ,' Of day. q. %S% BY ss
against the Company by Cornelius ssnde.e penn'to1n
With view to facilitate the tra ofthat suit, the counsel for
the plaintiff. offered the following stipulation COPY
OF which delivered counsel Tor the defend
The Ne York and Ne Haven Railroad Company sst Robert
PROPOSALS PLAINTIFFS ALL DEFENDANTS
WHO .PPE.RED. FOR rHE PURPOSE or FACILITATING
THE HEARING asp DECISION oE THIS ACTION.
l. Any of the defendants set any counter
claim Il already Ia their they may amend by
setting put In distinct eounerolsim as part of their
When sworn TO- plaintiff. viii not contest the facts stated
they such defendant notice that effect within
after receiving the counter claim A % the
answers put IN on oath already the Ss notice % be gwen within
twenty days from the day this stipulation shall be exchanged
with each party ,
the rshi sud claims Of all the defendants jointly wel
scyeray against the plaintiffs IN respect to all their et aud
aud Of the which they hold them and
il shall embrace separate judgments for agan., each
defendant the ease may qne IN the Judgment Of the Court
the referees trying the cause.
T. The cause shall be tried ( Special Term ~ by
or more referees three be selected By the par
and under order Of the Court embyns The
visions Of this stipulation 50 far As is necessary
s. Each deendsn, intended OF eountersm and the
which he received his stock b. tried
ana thee III. gpnunrne. the stock the validity which
denied tried 10 the order The defendants
may choose the Court the referees may direct
s. Tn, trial shall axe place on tho first Monday Of October
next II the put all the defendant. BY
that me and s parties spulate 20 make all possible dispatch
re.dy for tra by that time 4, shall be tried on the first Monasy
month succeeding the time when shall be At issue
No further sppess shall by the par,ie. assn.,
whom decisions have been made their dsmuue ~ the
plaint -.
by any de ndsut shall be stayed and further proceed
ing. b. had theD until the determination Of this action
such this Court the motion pending 10 stay such
suit shall prescribe provided howsVer that the paSth. h
Court 10 that behalf any the defendants may sPpy for leave
10 proceed In such suits upon the ordinary notice VI motion or
To the ''re'oi A',.. ;sso aIs.sy ,aay efs D"da""
s1fHsd 0cft0nf
GENTLEsEs: We propose preceding form Of stipulation
containing the basis Of which authorized
with all the defendants sppeared and
your concurrence with with is bants details with
alterations additions be proposed
b. agreed upon between Your early reply will
obiz- your ob-di-nt
TRACY. POWERS a TALLaADGE
Neto- York May % 1859 Plaintiffs A,torneys
Argument had Noy-s for the psntit ard Messr.
Bunil D. D. Lord, Eysr' H. y Clarke Dtesnsou, Aaun,
E Ven Wns Rapao and Cutting oF the various defendants,
bit % decision " made.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CoURT-JgSE 2-Bsfors
Judge BITS.
The uu-d sta,ss agt marked B. b. c. contain
ing Clocks and Stationery.
In this case, reported Thursday the Jury brought
verdict this r the claimants M Bs.
Il 4 L.. IL .harx. lfer