The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1856-1888, 1859-06-02

wards Of c~hancery. Why not Tho -
paternal government . and L., !, as' guaa
in this parallel. the coherence !. 'snsat
~ last party being voluntary as,;sa ~
Why foreigners shorld be asss;,.,
instigators Of the restraining law IS m,..'
their interests, security and ueao1
concern-particnlarly to those 80, =
places-would enter on a aev my
not Be a pleasant prospect, to aut;e;raa
able consequence, Of c~ontinuarlv l;,;
state, m~omentarily liableto prove
calling into use the revolver, and /,
GUS citations and trials.
"The right of acquiring, posses.;,.
property 50 strenuously conteudad
as the essence of a free constitution
violated. can only be maintained /. J,
referred toby the discriminot;o,
which alone can insure tie eoua,t.
where property a only be possesses g
and where the public, as we'll as N. Il
fare, instead of being secured, mus \.
in active industry and in trade.
What great general law. human !,
ever existed or can exist which do.
ceptionss The Chancery Court !,
supply the partial and injurious wo,,;
general laws in peculiar cases. wb.r
verdict is demanded in the lar cour,
be transmitted to the Equity Court g.
is the universal character of 5enefcis,..
the diriae administration by the lav
because it may prove fatal to tha
caused the tower of Sloan to fall. NJ.
has more presumption thar judgment.
proved the lack of careful inspection Of :,
guries; or is that of the sun, because i, ~
unforti6ed with a fatal stroke , or, tia, \.
cause it may occasion cramp or drowp;D.,
verse exceptions are not Endorsed on the -.
while all pre-suppose reasonable discr;S;'
Philosophy asserts, that the p~redouin,,-
of any contrivance proves the dispositioo n
let the constitution be judged BY III, -.
by the technical wording of an ISOLATED =.
the contracted thinking all in this r,g;a,
charged to the other sidei Where is ths >.
implied in the existing restriction, xbs,
unreal han any existing difference betr..
of men in one country, under peculiar ei-s
being incapable of present self-goyernm.u
of others, in different circumstance, vo. u
to the power of the temptation which ssDs
first, would resist to blood. temptations Of d
becoming naturalized in their families and
cles, with the same profusion and case q D
as they ask for this to be broadcast auo,,]
tive race! Political equality is not in az,
with diverse treatment, but protects ii.
welfare of each, by regarding and provifs.1
cial cases, the kind of benefit they are cps
of realizing. Change the position of the tEss
posed, and no real difference exists, excess
the one are under the admitted common III
land, and the other under the enacted d
distinction recognized by a prohibitory III
based on ~naturalized and n%atire, but on n
sites of the latter, as contradistinguihsi y
former; which would be the same, if te fnI
not exist.
Is not the reasoning in this case, Will
which asserts, that, s'to conform to the raelj
of the constitution, we must admit both eiaa|
and use, intoxicating drink, or, we mus q
hibition universal 20 and, how can the Gha|
instance, "arrogantly assume to direct and
when the natire national voice has entirely
question though in concurrence with, 4
ninety-nine out of every hundred, residents
The single fact stands out with the promo
the .dlps. that no instance exists on recCda
first introduction of alcohol among the Aaa.
to the present time. where the effect has na
one uniform haracter-unvarying, ~srksna
and physical desolafion-defying all the ID
restraints of after check, which can be bua.
action-which says with the voice Of an Ci
IL out, when you an, for its expulsion after
is impossible. To compare the present snnE2
intoxicating drinks BY manufacture, Or +
with the legally admitted indulgence, sr3
the glaring discrepancy between the two
every part.
The present practice is limited so much 4
place and agents, as to constitute only q tn1
shadow Of the ubiquitous substance to follow
ing concentrated essence for calabashes Of 4
ready acquisition to all for difficult, partial 4
certain attaiDment-as to the ~many-laWfa7
and free use, for the restraints of fear aniu1
if not as to the thing itself, yet powerful /
violation of truth, though mingled with "a
and legalizing away the present conscious
ing n wrong to God and Man in the VIOLATED
the effect will follow-not of committing n7
instance, a crime-but of walking u~ncOna7
the edge of an ever-charged volcano, csIal
ploding on the fated adventures
1t is absurd to think that the present ~
can stand against the sense Of the n~afiOs-s
that sense aow is, one of their number. tH
umoec, tells US, and he a sbrewd and in;elAss
sentative. He says, hat a native sePerEeSs
of making dollars, only consume = Ors :
also virtually tells us how much Oh lac :
for all, would increase properfy!e
As to the uncohstitutionality Of ste pre-
if there is any meaning or rele<ancy ne
points, it must be unconstitutional TO dasa
the restriction-snd, if the reverssas vsr
both the popular voice, and that Of oreln :
would suggest. the amendment of the c'Hs
the only reasonable remedy; it can be aaa
other defects-if this is one, why not br ~
of the Mail of april