New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-08-25

Bulls HEAp.-The little advance of price Of beef
cattle noticed 10 our Bulls Head item Of yesterday
a the opening day of the market, WAS fully main.
tsped through the second day, and ell the stock was
,oh ont a an early bour in the evening. The ad.
vance, However, was only upon irstcass cattle and
NOON portion of toe medium class the quotations of
which nd full particulars will be found in regular
market report. Cattle of the meanest class sold slow
II. dragging through the two dsys-or rather three
counting Moudsy at Bergsn-and at prices unremune-
ystiye to the producer and the drover, and afford
;ps only doubtful bereft to the consumer who may
buy what i. called beef at low pr per pound, which
Il bot rich In e-susiainrg substance. Some of these
cheap cattle that sold yesterday at 66 cents pound
fos the net weight of flesh, even If sold at core
spoa ing low by the butcher are not as cheap for
The consumer as Of the cattle that sold at III
cents, net, pound. They are poor, stringy trash
full Of sap aud of value for food than the same
weight Of Croon wser, Us present abouinabe dirty
taste included. And what waste of raw material
II b to send two-y earold hefeIs and steers here from
Ohio to be sold at the present rates for such stock.
MARRYING FOR MONEY, AND WHAT CANE OF IT,
Cecilia Pfeiser is little German Jewess, who by
prudence and economy in the management of small
busness in farcy goods had contnved to stow away
about $50 in the savings bank. Recently, King
Schoenftld, an elderly Of the faith country,
and calling, made her acquaintance, and with the
sstsEce OF certain las alleged copfedsrates, led her
TO believe that be was man of considerable wealth.
He was old, and she was by no means young; he
could not boast of good looks nor could She by any
stretch Of the Imagination, be considered handsome;
but he was widower and she spinster he wss
rich, by his own showing, aud she had snug little
ann laid hx Co han ha al 90
her bis wife, and endow her with goOdy share of
his worldly goods she did not refase the offer. They
were therefore united by Justice Steers in the bonds
Of matrmony on the 18th inst Prior to the perform
apce Of the ceremony, she prudenty required her
sutton to give her written agreement securing to
her the sole control OF her property. Instead Of
doing this is alleged had agreement
drawn between them, to the effect, as she subse-
quenty discovered the money which she possessed
should be deposited thereafter in their joint names.
On the day of the marriage SchoeDfed gave her $50,
and requested her to 20 with him to the bank aud de-
post that sum- together with her money, to their
Joint account, thus intending she believes, to OBJ
tain possession or control Of her funds. She refused
10 comply with his wishes, and has since learned that
be without the of supporting her, his stories
about his great wealth being wholly unfounded. She
af6rns that she has had to give him small sums Of
money several times since their marriage. She
learned that the persons vino bad been employed by
him to represent TO her that he was man of property
were to have received $l5 for inducing her to marry
him and had actually been paid $40 on account Ever
since she refused to give him control of her money
her husband has abused and beaten her, and con-
stantly oyed her. As they had not ye. been mar
ned in accordance with Jewish rites, she refused TO
oobsb with him until those rites bad been performed
and continued to reside in her apa tments at No
$50 Houston street. On the night of the 22d inst. her
husband s,me to her house in company with his two
Sons Louis and Abra HIM. after she had gone to bed
and made great noise in order to gain admission.
Fearing that they would misuse her, she refused to let
then in whereupon IT is alleged that they broke open
the door, and, entering her bedroom, demanded her
money. They say they only demanded that which
bslotg ed to the husband She refused to give it up,
when the sons pulled her out of bed and all three
beat her violently about her head, face, and other
parts of her body, with their sts after which she
swrs that they took considerable of money from
her person and apsrtmept-about $500 in amount,
a. sbe believes. She cried for help, as they
lco,td their hold upon her throat when one of the
sons escaped. policeman came in shortly after,
and her husband had her taken to the Staton-House
for dsor Derby conduct where she kept all night
and the x morning AID Tuomey, acting magistrate
at EsexAiaiket Court held her to bail on complaint
Of Officer Anderson, the above charge. While she
w~ in custody according to the testimony of John
Odel who lives at No. 80 Houston street, her hus
band King ScboeDfeld, bis two sons and Abraham
Schwartz, went to her place, and picking the lock,
earned off quantity of silk, gingham, tableclotbs,
undtIshirts, Stockings and other merchandise to the
ysus of $63. During Tuesday the true state
of the poor woman's case was ascertained by
Alderman Tuomey and he discharged her. Suisse
qusntly an examination by Justice Steers was OBJ
.ssed, when Schoenfed and his loudly asserted
that the woman hsd defrauded her husband of $780,
cold watch, and diamond pin. The Justice advised
tie woman to 90 and live WITH ler husband, and have
more trouble. She refused but, being sorey badg-
cred by his lawyers said she was willing to give him
what he had taken and 400 beside, to let her alone
hereafter. This his lawyers refused to assent to,
claiming the entire property above mentioned One
of them then managed to fill up new commitment
against the woman for disordery conduct and it was
sdroitly placed in front of Alderman Tuoney, who
wu It'll on the bench, and by oversight signed 1t, In
the belief that IT regular and came from one OF
the clerks of the Court; so that The woman wouia nave
been locked up again but for the intervention o'
friends who pointed out to the magistrate the decep-
ton which had been practieed upon him, when he
promptly cancrled the commitment. Yesterday,
Justice Brennan, being on the bench, gave
the Gaze a little closer attention. The re-
suit WAS that in spite of the blaster Of counsel
for ,be defense. he held the husband and his two
sons for the assault and battery the night OF the
I'D in 1900 bail each to answer at the Court OF Ses-
son, and entertained complaint for grand larceny,
in b,eaking into the premises and removing the dry
good against Scboenfeld his two sons, and schwartz