New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-09-01
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs-Aus. 3c--Besore Iuds-

UuTcN
Charles Shpl sgt john 81 THmbe 81 n
The plaintiff ins'itn'ed proceedings Under the me.
chsnics fen law sssin the bueins Lsura k.enes
qh..r CLAIMING balance doe him Of sSss Il for bricks fur
After issue iontd referred by coD.nt Of all par
t, and sppssrns tn R,n.s report thst at the se
OF nor the psinas the hos owing or
The contractors ~ho ord.toos tho e
~ Of n. building sbd Who the bh from the plain
M the def,ndsl I. De, .itilsd To iud.meDt
Uros ENTERING the Judgment be c~rs adjusted the a-eodsn
1879 a. OF with ts.5 allowed for Referees t~
&t0 n. Of tie oesndsu atru'y and The residue
usde Up Of with. f.s and o.h.r disbursements
sdius tie psn'if has apla'd 20 the Court to
no-d the scion of clerk sOs the stated
fo be fees d the s,ree I' NECESSARY therefore 20 look a.
h. .srs stue, respecting .noo i-,s aud so iu1 N. am
davis pagers to the clerk the time Of the ADJUST
rs,i as % me propfey 81 aus seton b
judgment The application Of the pr-vans party and gpn no
mr. Its inc pdpg fees II Officer. I'll. tees Of Re-r-s Ac
Ties disbursements b. slated la DEAL and verified BY
bul.m.nt, nm D. .r,d with The nodce q adjustment.
BY sec s3 tts R--re. fixed - Tor every day
sIsL IN The Of Referee out the parties are PER
urt.d In writing ether rs. OF COMPENSATION
Tbese statutory pnvor. seem clearly TO dshas eie duty Of
Of the pevps party for The fees OF r-ierse whrre The sum
elimsS oheot.d TO- no writing poosc.d ssleshs upon
d,s r zach spent IL tbs basiar.s the re,ee'ce All
b. sIGaiysy By AFFIDAVIT or BY other equally
b, ,,e rules then vii the affidavit. b. tested and hi.
The .ciins sday uasm.Se BY plaintiff sho s.ud that
the reference began on OFT o. 1851 the testimony
tss.n before yug man in the oa,e u the Referee ao
,ehsr there meetings watch t~.tu,uy sAs, o.
,abyp het opv ot~ety bal ia cou's.
qrsue- 9th, beiEg aud ,b- referred
being sss'd tsspg testimony In o'h.r c.''' was 90 's'
q.Dy eusb. proceed ~ith sid that the Referee his
eb.ra .ay and I'VE for prparins MS ep1r,
abr in slsisJhye day.. a. IS ea'h day-an 81 ~l;a the
In ptositon u t for purposes Of supporting
the clair made the o,fsDcs poincec t~o s laws q tHs
rnrd 10, sng nm.s u b. tue managing c-,k
Ref payinr The Of se~pns his booss frAHs ~
references AID law in,t he A"t record u 1e nluo's
OF Gays app id hr h'airg th-I.ip AGO he copy
the The Refer - charge IS Tor
ss,.e oh that b. record show. Of Jays .ppon,sa
d. sf. the snnth.-d IN. hsirfre "s
.rsl days IL The anDa 81 ID. c,e pr-EaIAoff 70 aud "a
The decision q u. fat the d. cisin taA.n by him o.
The iohctaaoD Of toe cOaprl M ID parties snd h. has 10
r,co'e II sAy occin 81 'Hlch IA, -,' a.a "
a sDFIEeRsis llhr ~ f-e or u srti
co, b. rs" hat s1y o-p'neens ss rees'ited 81
ADJ .uc - alrnsst-
Thr,e aiGa,., together with tie recsp. Of the Referee
ony p'Oo h. c-k time q tb- sil.ment sd
thnh snno b. sid nat hey are 70 a'a the sow'
hatsyer io Referees I. De could
. 80 "a 80 is 5s;ci =, dan or aess,sue., % i4V
Allowance sd a. ost taseo days for that
que hs. nun her Of day. spooa.sd for
The frf.r,no, uu-. b. shown that the Rf.s sttsadrd Ia
pr.n appointed e spo psee can BE- inpor,lst
Of The Referee re,p.ct % he caz,.
When ther. wns oicc-o .h sns ssrrea~n OF the
psr-ies ,ls., The law so~, ixed FOR ove,y
DAY s- BY the Eire person The business Of riI
eHe- aud 10 rrt.ls ts su, be- af,.
sa.ss itdsLcs ct ,h. ne AID place h1ed f the bearing
Mere proof BY his office 81 copy Of reood
s,p, b, hin n lie B.I.e. es ias aone 10 tion
that
iIs- wee .se) bad az winch tsnony a. aksn sac ihe
sequence Of 20, 81 the Referee
AID the uis Of biz sso - hsSr been
h. es'b before ~orl al me vsmonv r';slJ tssen
Dc 70 a'1y arj Allowance whatever of hsisfee fees
. N 4.
A,sou.b assumed tho seut before ,as he
.eyic- Of 'li. u.h De- rsErnd 'n- ssre. IT ne
F...s y.t pop r-a oE perceive how tbs
be ,Lt.L.c ULdr ih@ PECULIAR paIsOosv Of The stss,s
T.. r.. Only b. Allowed oT each day .pcu b. tie Referee
in he lU-urs. -freDc. ADD te parties .-
uus1 WI liz pr-aecs AZ tie he.-iuk 1a q. ab.s1fs sin-f
60 how tack IA; bis clerk wrote down sss,ea, Il
~hdh patis - 1e.af1 st1eoc.
Opon obctifp .ntte hin % ID. fee the only
allow. aI sclusl AID p.rsoLsl service.
H.. msb.fy 81 ohsr rs;errnce- cnssseueur
me t White. n. CoIr AZ fesgos. o. tie par
pointing referee es clerk. tnc-ed the p,rie. desire
IL bu !, fsr'hs. FsasoI iof allowing ha fe s
say Performed becsas. admit TIA. r.,rs.
sny than Ja~E- 81, b, PROXY In a- ui4 Of
- sos.d .-ryD shown c.a 1a asve s.~1
Ibe actual prsseDo- Of F-ssee REQ
coLcityn pre-. d-lt 70 .- a. osaGcs Il Zee fr L.dx
OF u,sr r.isrTed - him aid thus pr@ a..
b. tow1 siM1yrly, rc-n as IL "a, Jss-at instance ais 40
urssd an ob,ctin % the oe. Gained BY a sP,n
the &C JuI'u. u, 81 o Ga D. the c-rt.
II III psrts in ~ oorert AXE testimony beors
r.son mutually ssrr,a ;S,Is erssIy o. Os-cou
essr ~ -rsioes ,aas reoe-,rd
eas.r re Tsg !. 'e'e'ee - ssnee 20. .seh pr'e, ,.
80 ar ,te-r the acton has b-eL regularly referred 70
lin BY 4. Court
thIsbs examined hi. upon proof. sae al
esys sl,,d The st a. n. ,ia,e o. be a.nsn o. The
Ard s.Gast vhich
~ ~, ~ s.ie ,s. ma s a.. do, .1
thu. al NJ bfre the voas BE- en; fess'o
~ IL but the cocassl ", The d.'estat sd rI
test "a the ine oss, IN the ~ay q refer
ja.ns. any laSo.I let: might .aosn aader s'a
fsts tics b. Prevented before taese viii exs.
No h.esssiy for sre.ius r.>djss.nsst
., ,le mater s<rs ysnfsd b. sis ssys TIA. the a~srve
s % hs seaAny saeasss Eve Ss,' IN shRnios