New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-08-23
Law NI,ELLIG ENCE,
SUPREME COURT-CHAMBEss-AUG. 22-3efsss
hGRAHAM.-DscIsioNs
CONFksSlon Os JuDGAssT.
Claim ana ,,l,ers at Rufn. S<akr

COnFksSIos OF JUDGaEsr.
Ciau and ssl'ers sst Rufus Sanger
This molten Is made by iadg nert creditor OF the
the sa Of iDaebdurss Toe ai entered
pioD note tor specified date aud smount which note
gwen Co fo goods. wares ana a. ichaodsr there
nd oed BY the debtor aud into the haais Of
p'sinaiis for vsaso!. nsidersioo."
Of woih he iDoebedies' 10 all the cases ooa-
coed that object OF the ssnte Wa TO compel the dsbsr 70
much the watch the Indebtedness
enable tbe creditor TO form accurate opion
the nter Il the e'o in coa.sios the judgment ana fog
th. puTpe compe the putes ptrad the record
nd specific statement of the facts out of which tae in
c.n,duess arose. tCharpo AIT Chapel 2kernan slS
III. precise presented M I'M. cs 10 have
pas-,o upon by the General Term 10 this Dsc ia Moody
vs. Tow no. Abb Sa Roosevelt. 10 that says 4
genera all that the ind for goods sod and de
weed phsnce with requirements of the statute
H. trehgb Va bIns, et al Howard X. p az BroSn. j.
held ha hich syeued thu indebtedness
nt for + t =" ont OF money beng mad o the dsenaent
the M,'hOosr Episcopal ChurCh u Howard, H. flo sndh
j. hello OF ndeo;eduess for mousy eut
by the plaintiff the oef.ndHt aud which has '-rs
used to p'y his obts was rsuoen because dad not state
In Lcck 1850 est FINN all 10 r. r., p 4is. Ro.eksu
be that hat th Indebtedness Tor DDS and
M sod aud delivered by the plaintiff % the defn1sn
specified Insufficient because did not Get f,h
wtkna Of goods Sc wee .od nor how much nor a. y1t
That DID point particular transaction 70 which
other CREDITORS ooad direct thcis inquiries
In Be- kmaI AIT Knk 10 Howard z. r., p. 2s Hsrhs j..
nd given money borrowed by the defendant defscvs
nent wa. recovered. see also IL n; Y. Rep, pa
other which might be- cited OF smiax
character the amply sufficient show that
preseu, case, would condemn tae insaf
ceut and defective will only add by the Geaerd
Tsrn this Ois'rct IN Dyis Norris II B.ok D. l5z
Mitchell r. j. held Of indebtedness nooey
sdssnoed at divers by the plaintiff the defeni
at, fr N ls5S 10 date n.nfHcieo,.
These d.sons which the General Term Of this
District controlling upon this question: Notwithstanding
few of contrary by the JUICES Special
Tenn n other Districts, such Post sgt Cossr Howard
4. X OF.
The plaintiffs action not orisnal creditors bv
Sold and suggested that lees
required from them than would be from the
whom the debt wss originally due.
There disiDcOn made III the statute aud there sool
shown for max any such d.tin I'll
be made by tho debtor add CREDITOR
ana well partscnlas
the particular Of which the indebsl
ao.e he easily sa the csn besp
rarseed third person he could before transfer
The motion aside the snent the creditor mskisg
this n.o,iOn must De granted
John HI McLuDn tor creditors; T. Williams, for defendant
THE GRsDsoLL CAsEIsA NEW PHASE.
Mey,r Gedsol sgt Everett A. Carpenter and N. Ncbol
10 this case, IS will be remembered the plaintiff
New.Yoik merchants He sass In affidavit that thu
defendants rcib abducted him In the Of 81 Louie
tootd him carriage and confined h In the cssboss,
Tor three days without knowing where he
being a wed 10 communicate with his frends He fur
alleged ths he falsely npr~ned detained With
there bling made against hm, and that he
detained graft the malicious sad exasperstsf s-nss
Gndso upon this aiiagit applied tor order Of
against The Court srauted the application sn1
each OF the defendants bail Ia the $1,000 Joha
Cook and Son for plaintiff.