New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-06-16

t~ety .Afs day Of April 1859 sud became valid AID na4ins
sha II P1F'-Anee Ct sGea resolution 'h' 'Pp6ssJN BLUNT
Sven to b-sr- n. hi, 18Th say q May 1873.
EDwD a. DAWN, CpnnH ,s''ear' az o 49,, \,
AnrsIed 20 tb- AssAst certificate By D. County JERK
.s s'. fTa .h.s sy NJ s' aor I eoa p.ia. in IN
sst ssa.Is; MyO &c, and '''eineh' 'i7's 20 - TIC
Mooney agt. Mmks-aoton denied but without
Bostwick a.. CromweI-Exceptons overrued and
Simou-or aet. O'uara-Set,lei; allowed
L@ary agt. Robert.-Csse settled.
Canal Trss-Beaore Judrs DALy BK,Dr and HftroS
OPINION.
H,- az. DuLham and DnOa
Brady. 1.-THE verdict Is clearly against the ev-
denoe Ey,r s-baof The descan's There 10 onn OF
witnesses ca The snb 20 wbich that evidence rsea pun
ham $40 Az desL cssnb the IN which the pGncn~a
ofwhisty .nd b,h .~e-r that 1t ~as ~e 1~-'
~ sSaioI L. M, IhoG P-3 wSn Haar '1r'sy 81 sn
La1 and LA~-o1 woo heard the -'toaJ A. To the $40"
.as {, ~ s., S T.y ;sf uea hs, ,s
WHISKY ~ss ~. slowed 1hom-on sid Lsinhri also state
~aicl vas due by the ds-ndan. ~as extra sd OF
1tis rrtcSui Tnerr eyidebce before stated 10 coz
"a 80 ,'' D. Was h.i- acu.inied ~h ne OF w.
ri 80 On being st-d IN. oPnioa - n the 'o"aS- toe wn
bow wi-hog; tsi ir, ~ts;h-r well q we'd He
further ssc ~" vii sunuss-d viii tmhrr as the rnooy
then shoDd tEus IL pfe'y vel slowed There
DO crci fact that the pgnch~ou dusuast IN
The nsiner referred aud the ;esinony Of tue ae w
d.vte either sbout tia; the shed shrr
hesvy rain scGs are Sh The shp ws sborns heavy
M We storm ne paiotn .'sinl s-r.d no '.,moey on pa
thoy the prrdestrs th1f y-rne They ~o1s not ~
nesss xer no, only not Dp.scbed bat cItr.dc.ed in
ed b. SAID that ;hcy sa-'ainst BY McEsen on
Ii, question II ~ the ia which IL dous
b proper Tnee uevienoe the part q tn. pi'n
IT, tue. to the eact Aai that Of tie Load Of tue
yurot~u which kbk-d H. se--d to have BE- clsf-d
god deal ard be pauf counsel sem. think that that
tia, be PuneheOa bad been injured during the yoyase
A.rr Ing such Presumption ssrrsn-d IL ally sell war
presume puncheon chsd ny the snhnS
# the e.s or dars that hitiHs would BE- very sr.r.ofd
which shows beyond reasonable doub, that puoheo was,
pr ..,a an, opinion in .lppor, Of IL aud think the jury would
iot b justified II Eivirs !. precedence
I Th,t the whi,iy well slowed.
II Th,i the .s Il occsoped BY The shifting Of tie
III That there acknowledgement Of the v-se in the
blow which resulted IN the shifting Of thr cargo
the ju1.uen Of the Court below should be reversed
SUPREME CoURT-srtcI,b Tsss-Jane ia-Besre Justice
CLEEEE.-DEcisioSs
McCready agt. Atkius.-Deuuuer oyerrnled with
cost. with liberty 10 answer In 70 days
Field dgt. Ripley.-Saule order.
Hurley agt. Second American Building Association.
Same order.
Unirfd states Gutta Percha Company agt. Sawyer
ct h.-Ssne order
Mill act. New-York and Erie Railroad Company.
& order.
Wells aei. The Nassau Water Company.-Judg-
u.ut On demurrer for deleLdsuis with coats, Sc
Sergeant, AsSigLee, &C. agt >mtb.-Demurrer
oyerrud This secession apply to the two other csses
Is CHANsERs.-yusE l5-Beoe Justice ROOSEVELT
Emu, Clement. sst- Abraham Clements.
ROOSEVELT J-fhe plaintiff, widow recently
married the .cond time having commenced suit Tor
with for carrying on AZ the granting ot
hey pres. nted is called Professionally at least to
loo the wnoe men of the controversy Tn--e At p-'-n
only udsen Of by the sdav which in some respects are
e.c.r sy contradictory but IL others sufficiently narmo
nou. . enable the Court to decide tine n'Ot,on
There oppe hst the PARTIES WHEN they married bad
both arrived OF discretion the one being widow OF 49,
the vino Of ,hre score that they were both
.ey disappointed N their respective sn tns tny
hew apart sstney oseth- aud thst su,
Of srsaton the premature and hr''oon it OF th-r
The groom although Doctor feeble invalid needing
s-.Grs bis dciDg the bri'- ALTHOUGH
robust and powerful hs' Al nci1aon may De aerrd
to q q the 45nrt0 more lot winch she
accordingly sot nsree the lh oftne aad "a
theu NUT delison'-ht, 'n,-we.e
however till toe 6t6 OF January On the night q H.
dy according the honeymoon ing ouiv half
or r. commenced wuie bed deliver bn.f IL cutau
of coal n car nes IN aHyr
Of the prrc.- language OF which she pross n
Quote ana gestures cesuG IA her fst OF great
bodily hsiu Tn' to her account ~s ' wed
others Of hk. character ult the plaintiff win her
osushts lady u twenty years lett
W to be obscryra that defendant deres under osh all
the charges made him sna tue other hand accuses
dsptn neglect q her domesro du les tearing
h.. punching his sides with her fists, thrsaienns WITH
had ihmor nexp-cted discovery that in-ad Of
5000 hT food deans had supposed he worth
his protest. bis wealth rot TO exceed soV
~ . sso, - az A. bo. ever me ds. notslexa that toe
defendant this deceseo her the d.apP nn-ut
fuui.hd II complaint agsnst hiH Or view OF all
th both sides think obvious that toe.
mutual fau the probabilities that Ii. d-t-uosut
may the usl Of ESTABLISHING quasi countercan
against plaintiff ascrtaud perhaps than sufficient
to b4lsrte b. the difficulties between them
T. woud b. unjust therefore this Of ,n- suit 70 make
him ish DOL, f defending bat for asins him
especially the plaintiff has- frequently drcsrd
abe had sufficient properly Of her own derived ffom hfmer
husband.
Eo.on m order DEF ndan, ray counsel e' and other
p.n.-. t. carry the lfgstion DENIED
Vim Brsfd at. Augustine Ford; George Stuart
Il a. Sams-Ou whole prtseued BY ahds
wits % both sufficient for
81 aging tie Geie on tue motoE n~e
fcle !, deLi,c.
Before Justice SUTHERLAND.
John T.. Camufeysr. &c agt ThOs. A. llOwland,
Sc-pTder, uodih-d. granted