New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-07-20
Elizabeth Bloshsm agt. John Blosham; Rober
DiedeIicks agt. Samuel Wsrd-Orden settled.
coIrRr OH COMMON pLEAs-Grnrr,L rr.n.-JuLY
Before Judges DAILY, BRADY aud HILTON

Before Judges DAILY, BsADf aud HILTON
John II. johnson sgt Thomas L. Kay and others
DAILY, r. il tbink there WAS evidence To warrant
IN. and Iyas Of the e. ssssr III.
endsns employ I.wss par bis duty 70 Pat tns belt On ~
Sequence q ,h- set Of the dsna. no having proper
,a guards and ffon the machinery being defective. he We
severely The injury Therefore from their nssleo
aud they sns~sabe for the consequences When the se
building went hs testified in he excitement. Of tae momea
Tor phy e Saw the p,na oa h@ . ak the b. s' s.
ward IePted he did TO the bootkeep~r TO snom was M
The Of wh. he had done and Of The
plaintiff upon ocnener as they paid hum ais wass
Sery critical state critical Is seemed scarcely possible
that hi, hl could be saved BY human .l !. Va h ntsrs
got well enough the plaintiff bough, him 20 the desndans
oat - hrm ;nr re.u u bis te deiendsnt abo surgeon
They then and there promised 70 pay his BIZ Tsy never dis
sry Oh ect until the bin n when the objection tney
mad. merely thst tn. BID was TOO nigh
that the -mPoyms, the plaintiff BY the clerk wss stn.o -
that after they mad knowledge ths, be had called In tse
p.u,H upon thai the plaintiffs services
continued win their scquesceace and sppooson and WITH tn
ing on tAs "a lai ,ay w'fs % p % nr Nv
doctor john, and thu, of ssd thss ha
led TIA: i Va. said in laughing wsy from when J
ties hsd ht 70 infer that not seriously said % nsnsd
seriously dissn what their clerk Dad done IN calling 10 tss
plaintiff telling hun 20 take good OF the M lred man $40
.na :. s ~ ~ %e me, & have aoS. as aas
had testified, 20 distn overcome oy any ga eoL u'oI
hi. a.d been sgsa The the injury vas csa.sd -
their neglect that they p@cunsny resp io me con
seqlsEers anoag which the e1p.u- inead ia ne csf
and cure a thu In ur.d Keegsn as Western kAiroAd
psny S-id.n. us Their prs.emsbs sIo~edse that N
pa.,f ziying services TOE ano.ancng mat M
we're % pay b while engaged they did nothing
20 d,c him II that imp.sson bu; the contrary, when
81, TO-, w.I, .see.i spd mo cured promised
par IN. bill was my dznent evidence enough 10 make out
1 heir liability % the plsinth , .
Irbns h,xsysr th.t psntfs recovery mus. be limited
% ID. anon, ;be bill wkh hs rendered. Tia. hts
.s,ia tim. VI the value Of his services and Of the poo
which D., upon bis sbo and he saont not, By going Atr-
upon the stand and swearing ,ns his services wh
mo. than double be bad charged be allowed
,bat estimate that IT, judgment for 30
when the rendered ass and be did ptend that
there any mistake Ia IT, In fact when undertaking
tesy The value Of his ercss he senssd TO Be whou.
liked certain data aAd thought the services had been
ch thai he might charge anything BET ~oen
tao and hve hoa'srd doarss very wide and liberal range
| certainly.
Judgment reduced 70 $a3. aud affirmed Tor thai amount
| Edssfe Gossett 4 Co. sg- Croker Warren. .
HiLTos, J.-Ine plaintiffs IN replying " the defend
,na Aos~W instead Q! stating At length the allegations