New-York daily tribune., 1859-05-25
LAW LN7ELLIG ENCE.
uSI-Ep STATS DISTRICT coURr-a,' II -sst~'
Ths rrl,ed s,a.s. AZ. Foer BAL, "

Lag BYrrs.
Tks Vtised S,aes Az. Focr Bss, d DsSua1
1ls action 10 secure duties % ceft@ln es.ea
e di0sse iagoed b, ,ss ,hp IVES, Por; lon Ensasi
80 sd cou,gnea 20 John Mhsksf Sho esins the ssss.
spear. has % invoice Of tie socs Ga D. so" - mss
sa. BY .eyny 3. ssAy =, ne sS,sss as ss
ground o. iaad o. acnpra 1age - Tia aPoAsE b. enaes
ne "a ,s, dsaied aad saa eNpiaaea II. di.erep.scy b.
the ayoee sna the - ss'fs As, ,h ss.
in le sctu ana that he knew Gang Of tbs
fc; oG he a To- saief nesf 81 Ja'd' Than saso "a
the tavcloe.
Tn, tu.,cd states ss,. Two Ca,,' aiarkcd RI.
This sui. was brought to forfeit quantity OF gcoas
imported n 1885, me soard Ia the wtre oi an oe-ceas
ohacr The claimants ne at AN knowette e ~ ehas s
of goods he Judge sseS ie ,n, tn. u, .t.ess -
eed, n9ths'snaius e -esE aeniy q eAssSss o. ,ss u"
Acssrs. Hapt DitA L. Assistant DistTics AtsoIies ter
Go,esru.su-. Mr MeCglhh kr claimant
PowTR oF MASTER TO PLEDGE STRIP fos SUI
PLIES.
Soy sra o:her act The Bark Convoy Jau' "a rss.
ard
BITS, 1.-The bark Convoy, owned IN this port,
IVES 10 Gayosu under the command Of Cow s
master arrived distress December, teS
signed BY shs claimants The lSelsass merchants residing in
T ANTS s., .he instance Of her ua,er advanced mocry-
aud suppl the psr and hmsnt OF the yese necea 70
enable Hrr 70 make her rurn voNse 70 her pot, M
master hsd 70 funG the with which tae.-
cSrS al ha p Ss S r he Pc.e The Se.ai. .a.
he advances applied Coz BY the master uPco the esps sond
and OWE, r he repaymen, ,ssreot bin
change should the upOn the AEtis
house Brewer Caldwell Il Newlok r the smcast sacs
advances whom The bark with her irtuu dwight sh,ud b
also consigned guaranty tor the satisfaction Of the e of
cLau.c aad de bt.
The answer o for defense the alteration that the hseAa,s
ad moneys sued for pon the credit OF TIE msstes ana
Brewer Caldwell who, IL alleges wee chserprs Of IL,
bark s; credit given the vessel her In
the trsusactiCn.
Th answer s sgppre By the poo and the ssnis
upon the in foreign port to Americas
vessel Necessary supple. furnished her there the spplcs
n her no had crd other Of obtsinnS
moneys or Ler relief haa through the pedle Of ths
vessel therefor The OF Thomas Osbone s Howsfds
Rep s clear authority In OF the principle OF hs
y the opinion the hole Court there
was division Of opinion between the members Of the Court pos
no later decision supreme Cogr which mpaip the
and penrrcy q that IN respect % the facts presa,
cd the bak Galveston UaSs
special and in unexpected and untoTesees
emerr.urN storng uuder for funds pressing
her situation would have vel warranted her tskss up
the necessary for her relief upon boiiomry security
(Prai, Reed ~ Flow Rep SSl aud will sceorns Uphold
the in ue lien therefor The pledge VI Ia.
vessel accordingly valid In this instance and
whether she under charter third parties or In
sion Of her actual the time would Ia sf
received Galveston schag, u the liability OF the
81 for the debt proof Of pcrsousl cpd tr the Indictment
solely 10 the chaerer syaled only
of the upon The advances and supplies furnished -
the use II the hNk by the hbelarts.
decree entered In favor of the uben for hs
Os the with order rre C0mnisiouN
10 ascertain aud rerott the amount unpaid.
Martin Smiths hbesn;s r. H. Shannon aud Beebe DeAa
4 Donohte for owners.