New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-06-14

me- ~ sa~- ds. ssssH. sas'eia q att >i,s
y 's- essrs 0,'ss, w.' sas "a enact .esa.n. -A s.'
L~rH oftf- 2,' CAV E-bfuaiy se cat h- h. Aa,~
asfs e. .,Ps.A y ihs VI, y Wa. ,n ,s'ai q IS -'
$40 - - ci sl h~ hss cpy q tis Did NJ ~ b --
b N -.. =, f,sr .s' f,g~ nm Distracted o'ul
o.. 49, wl,i-gt ID. .uo~ee, '', Taa &c g., not
H. -; "a 30 sc-uay ior sah -rs IS, D. ,apP~sd
"a ia, ~ -. 81 th's se'ia thar ~
n'ni q 's'c -"fs he'd ~. sue IN sce'dsi~ with ~ ID
se ricr ~" oit-sc bed h-u awarded y % ala that -
h. y kuawl' DE- u rh- oou'rlry row.
rnssu enc bccv IN The hsb r-'snS ooPe, Of
6ies ','1'isets tus 70 r-y &C ,ae orsiaa reoOrs
fer s.d ~oi now sxr,utoa by
hig :, L. eIiy tvleSr. AID b, states positively, Aai q b.
s,, .tn H,ar iseta By eePoneu' or At d. ia.'sson. %
II s!F,l' ia, tie original biz. cannot, aler dalseu,
Mr. LOVE-, an !uspyca cs hc record OF the ca.
i.s,, isse '''''' ''' ''4''
H. es produced. 'nd Inspected BY coUseai. II Is .u
mt tie tact a, rs- iErr inquiry b. allowed ia iar
3, ID R,yi.,t s,.sie Judgment in any cOa Of Ssr
81 C. ~ ss'ee ~ irT-ru,'y "a "a . o. unless such N so0
b~ tu year ag tie time sccs jaisaeu
aeI.d. CIR. :, SO sec p
1h' c. tsc 7il uur' rrnensivr The Court nav
u Il ecittuu sLa un such terms s. nay D. just Al 'ne
th'n sf-er notice h-T,oi -yr party fnr siE
m.t .ef o. .'ler Pcel tascn sss'' hii h7ous4 h's
II scarysl, be that been had
srani nstsu tri,i under such clrcam.,.nc-s
Tkr d,cisor in tss Cour q levy Sc; joyce ~Sorh,
Rep llct liza els Thoug1 excps.bie
ouhsru, and vtry special crcursnces cnaa upn
irv N II. risit. = man, o.tr. vas sio,t,4 sf issn~si
~ n tie va ftau- and pertinent Of Bel ~ Nely q
.a pre ss TO snsfc Se ss ' T ~
tar AZ apPicon to vT~n the Judgment ai, hi,
eirrnstt lad b'u an indorsr sye ne. OF te hro Of
Ty~r &C.. and supPscd when sued that as action
f sreh notes hsi sbut The l7h Say May 1892 tars
jnogmeE'I he for ID. FIR, discovered
rad hsn in ,he asb Of fEsn. his several that
sSlcd o. he p SSfSsy :. 500 =, h. .p was
aroused NO had refused let him he note The asnen;
~ 90 90 a.. HaT FfF..t
Now tw point. h.t,r tied than mis- motion for
lev TIA 90 TIE ground Of rewyii"y-rd evidence vii rot
be eHt,Itiur where he sppcut bad the pro
cu tie cyicsrce 81 the former rr could II
m eais,, pce hr with tue uae Of sr ds,n nee ~i,n that
wtioh IA. ohfa.d subsequently tGrshsG aud Waterman,
voi l.eSo ieSsl
Az asssrc u conpty. however, other side, any
ndu.e m Court 70 gran, TIE ,fpo.,,os, 49, ,. A.e 49,,
that b. plin participated IN. Knew Of any such fraud
Nor should b. warranted u s,ys ha, the more nc q he
ezra suourt ene g. % ralsss pesamP'ion Of Trend ~ him
Tie titled Ia aV and pnce 90 be benefit 81 the cnn-der'-
thi he las Fever kep COPY Of BIS bid believes tie con
ac corrsp coed h r. and that he aSeisge OF al tac ods
filling esrh aud me average Of the total
amouurs Tor thu whole - about Al a.
BIZ .he plaintiff, Yiudcating his Integrity presents
-ase oT of defendants tie 10 b. assumed
hs'iEl o,led ed a foytwG co. i' esi.a la'Is MS
III nine lover bidders The contract made by the
uissfste mistake Of the fact The
sancioad aud tenaed b. made aSs TT twenty-five
II. actually made uIoldcd IA iac ard
-. -, 70, emit, IT, gor,etisn never ,ece.d
this. but old agree which he pnuth
51ss Of Il cou,rae is anne ground o relief and the power
OF the Court n give re' entertain no doubt Levy et Joyce
Boswo-th'. Rer. 622)
BIT plaintiff has e.rormed the work. and has GO gis
litigation, that he is entitled payment There does
be any justice good reason fOF giving relief beyond
correcting ;bc in this particular
Ny impressions are th Code permits The fixing u terms
conditions that plaintiff has ght 10 put hm'f In the
psce Of the actual lowest bidder Mr. = whose proier for
The consequence Of would reduction upon the juds
fut u Ifji with Interest from the lstd OF May. 1851
sun ooub whittier can 40 anytime larry under ms