Semi-weekly standard. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 1853-18??, 1859-01-27

budgeon OF heavey stick. This other gentlemen
knew and therefore pulled of my over coat to Do
on the alert. He did not think the word bark had
been used. Now in regard to that portion Of the
Senator's remarks in reference to me acknowledging
myself dog, "canine character 50 disgraccfnlly
assumed" &C., have only to say, answered tho
Senator from Orange on that OCCASION and have
nothing to regret In conclusion. Mr. Speaker said
Mr.. Guyther holding up and pointing to the IRE
port in the Register, have only to say that this
is garblcd report full Of flsehoods and that the
author or authors are palpable liars.
Mr.. Miller said, the report was correct 50 far "a
it referred to him. He had sanctioned . part Of It
and told the exporter" it was true, and he was
responsible for that much Of it He had done moth
ing but what his conscience approved and he would
do the same over again. The proceedings had been
garbled in paper famous for garbling or no notice
would have been taken Of it by the Register
Mr.. Guyther said, he had not Mr.. Miller in his
do with it but if he held himself responsible he
Cir. Guyther,) had nothing to take back.
Mr.. Cowper said he was responsible her or else
where for much ofthe report" rs referred to him.
Mr. Leach said the report was correct and he was
reported " nearly correctly" He did moi. lno~ rho
the reporter 'eos Ifany gentleman was dissatisfied
with anything he had said - let him come to me and
it will be properly settled"
Mr.. Guyther did not intend his remarks to apply
to Mr.. Leach. He appealed to the Senators from
Person and Richmond to say If he had not been mis-
represented in the Register:
Mr.. Turner acknowledged writing out the remarks
attributed to him. He claimed the responsibility Of
Them He said the report" was not claimed to
be full He read the note appended to it by the ed
seen the report before it went into the paper and
"approved it" He thought Mr. Guyther had moth
ing to complain Of He had said nothing to him
that night nor Mr.. Guyther to him. He came over
to that side of the chamber and he thought had
ted improperly and he did say that he must be ex-
cused from considering Mr. G. in his canine charac-
ter. lie, Mr.. 7. denied all knowledge Of the stick.
| He had calleda gentleman-a son Of Mr.. Badgers
to enquire the time he desired to know how long
| they had been on Simpsons case. He saw no stick
with him, and he had since enquired Of that gentle
man, hearing this report. to know if he had such
thing and was answer that he (Badger) had not
| even a cane. He asked If any Senator had heard
him ask for stick, had seen any placed near
him. IT. then, Mr. Guyther had pulled off his coat
because Of stick, it was under misapprehension
| of the facts.
| \ message from the House was here disposed Of
| Mr.. Guythcr desired to say one word more.
Mr.. Speaker. The chair must take the response
bility Of allowing nothing more on this subject.
Mr.. Guyther resumed his seat.
Mr.. Turner said he had given way for the message
The Speaker refused to allow any more to he said
The business of the day was then proceeded with
[,H In connection with this subject the Senat,
Reporter of this paper would ask the Senate Rcpor
ter of the Register if he Iy the note append
cd to his Senate proceedings in tine issue Of Satur
day last to say that he wrote any Of the "rcports
referred to? and If they were not all written, o.
caused to be written and furnished for publication
by Mr.. Turner" These questions seem very cas-,
to answer. And this Reporter asks further il tn
Register Reporter ought to have written the moi.
alluded to: 1t is dsingcnuous and pcttifoggSh, t
say the least Of it.