The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1859-04-13

m
,ossS,, s-ars W. esei csJ; also Mrs. s.ekIes; IN
n, n.oruns Dss NJ sss.s shs svs,fs no ~as cry
80. Tsasectrr dexu Ia =; ssos. h.t p.s, eight
ui.r Inc. sfi. - held b face m lis hands aud was
er. s .nd sott an4 IN great 10, ole. VA. vary sorry
a 81. hun " foah,s nsysed cr,iag: heard cry
~ ID the siasy sefore sas .r scses; believe Mr
Vost ~.sc 10 she Sta, y, bus a.d not him, Me-
scs'~ rss sors 40 s,Ai,.
Mr. DFasy--i all haHi al paper 10 the csanse on the
othsr SIDE. We pfofs " read u csidcooe. IL n Mrs.
acklss rneut ~ her hussards-
rtr cc.sffssicS or MRS. stcxLEs.
TIE ollos,nss Ne -nsiss sr,,cn esnfss-ou, which
was crtrc ~ syideocs,--
fAave sss a house IN Fnceuih fuset, with NJ. Key.
Zee nssyt az 90 tksow. I beacve tho hoase be-
spss e q ,oores ne houss uaoocupiei. Com
srssd ls sosSe As,ss sArt II tsaaary. Have been
"a sloss ca -ah NJ Key rsaany stAyes an
were yarSs bed N ne srcoat sorry. DID wha.
os..alks .ksea somaa ~ 60 Tie intimacy con
mssseaAs snser. whsu cane ffm New YORK, IN thai
foss az ntnnseg u an hulsoper knd- Have met haf
eva tnaes 81 r,sse ~ errunt so ~ ,hs day Ga
nss.as a. M wsss, saa Wednesday sks woehi
rafg me- nes Nhsu ma ths street. AMI - parties.
Nssstuo1d fga@k h nm ~hea M s.chies a. home,
bsssss knew b. dia lar 10 SOAK him I'D
90 o. NJ Fsy a. resne caps sf,er 7 sus here. We
ihsnssd rae te h4d htfss he hsuss a. place ~aess
b. % esula sasst assccd " A. usa posnieg " eat
- frs issre TIE rcem = ~sFuss Ny ~oed afs. NJ.
EsYssasrsiy sos afss Have ~4ksa lAcfe togfshe' sy
40 usaes--i % ssnk tssre wednesday
IA D. txest tuo a1a ftfeo. scat there aloae Laura
Va Al Ars Booyrra NJ Ksy teek aas on her tl,efo
ssn5 sss~sa Fsc~ there I Fasecnis sssses 70
mel NJ KY freu Mere sse raie ssuaas inme
dasy ssss A.. 40 IN issf. "A sFs iisssess, ases
yn IA Fnssuih street. Nstt n ~ We nans sase wset
he aahf beafoos, 40 tbssa impeapss iltsfvios
s.f lad uadfcfstd wyssH hr. Neg aadfessad aha.
MA tccatsd a. Wrasesdag, aSf % fs0saSy,
sta ~. ksy Rae ktsea me IN tbs house
l1n,bsf a slass : 80 nss esAy tsAa base AA1
nsct MS hoss at Apsnf ysaf seo, "a NC pArlor,
90 "a sols W s.csfs sonsues OF - tosn, Haa
somsiluss a Ne cagaoL ! iAinG ne Intimacy con.
rsuoea 10 Apr ~ xay lsas sia nat tslok safe 10
meet bna ~ l.s haasr. there servants alb
n.shi sssreei tblus Asa general nes, base WON
. tass ana ~hae ~oosen paid dress, and beaver h.s
uin1ed van haacs sslssa Save woru elsas sls
drss AFRO PLAID sis arezs, eisok velvet coas
d mined WIN lace biass velvet shawl uimnea ~th
bass. On WEDNESDAY eahe' bsi "a my bro~a dross
o. bask and vi e woocB trcss beaver has ant
ssasL Isrsased with NJ. Kes 10 ~ ns escs Wy,
steF ieavipg fAnra a. Mr. u essr2 Hs mt Al NJ
Deuglas'. rhs AuADsvneri ~ a. IA ne back way
oliher made 10 the ~ NJ. Doogia1 soaia
be hss likely 10 be Tue house ~ ff
tenth street, bctseeu and streets, 90
sse ef hand SIDE u way; arranged tao aervies tr
wednesday "a the street, tnink Non iay. Gen,
he front door cpsni occupied the rom;
dressed nlyEea aaa he also, 10 bea sssshaf No,
Key has ricdep NJ ssics carnage and h.s called II
bis house without Mr.. scsss snosieise and affair nay
being told DOT 10 hlm do 50, aud against Nc
sekies' repeated request rFRssa BsGloii
Ibs h a true statement, written BY mysaG, sths4l
any besa out by Nc sokl ii fofs veness
reward and wi,h,u, any uenNce from hsm. THIS rave
written with ny bedroom DOR opcS and my nss aai
child in the sdjc niug room, Al hair past esh, ocncs
the evening Miss Rdgcley Ia the house, within can
TERESA BAGioI
IAsAysyyE sorARs, Washington, o. G, Feb. I'd, isSs.
Mr.. and Mira pendls,on dincd here two ego lss
Thursday, with a large raris. Mr. Key also here,
her brother anda my suggestion be was invited because
be lived in the came house and also bessuse he had
yted Mr.. sckes dine with him, and Mr. scklcs wished
10 invite al those from VIII m he had received invit.os
and Mr.. sieklea said, edo as you ohooae"
rEREs, BAsrorr.
Written and signed in presence Of c. ~ Ressly sei
Bridget Duffy.
FEBRUARY &c. 1852
ARGUMENT OF COUNSEL on IT'S ACCESSIBILITY As
EVIDENCE.
Counsel for prosecution examined the piper and confer
ed about its somissbility.
, encr, anu tho psr,r DcfVre the susg..
Mr. Brady would state, in general way, the ground 90
which they offered IL as a COMMUNICATION 10 Mr. Scsios
fcctng his mind and producing confirming the
under which he lsborcd; they had fully ooasutsd
the authorities 10 its admissbly IN that point ~ view
The Judge read The paper slowly and ssntively
The Iis,fo. Attorney argued thai the deuce
admissible many grounds struck a toe % ss-
vera OF the most cardinal rules q evidence; 10 rs
~.
a communication PACING between husband ayt afe--
parties who were executed f1on be NJ .or OF
AGAINST eaeh osnef Las rue no1 eay exto2ao@ V direct
esumony hut went farther, aud pfeeent.i freq neatly
and generally collateral matters between LusbaDi aud
wife being given IA evidence. Inis evidence, under.
cation but the ground the statement prosacsd
temporary insanity the hisbari WA thross p,s
OF sanity by thg Communication, that fact could be ds
pcty proved without The communication i'soif bellg ,t
IN evidence his insanity could be proged By the coal4s
OF the pTsouer bot could NOD be proved
ty the character OF any commune zion made 10 HIN los
necessary tendency pot 10 produce ipeany, fone
minds would be affected more aud less by sash a
commup aUop and therefore II could u0t 10 pa Ia es
dence 10 prove insanity.
Counsel for defence argued the admis,by Of THIS on
esson. II was offered Tor the parIosc OF ntug or
the state Of mind III which The dei,n liant tine
VI The homicide; helped 10 conFt2te thai ifrosstbe
pressure under which he acted Ia reitfcEcs et4sf
murder or msnslavgbter the state cf mud slliu
po.ant. How Tar bat cou:esssoa would act The ps
soners mind would be matter for the jury 20 de
cioe but the relevancy or competency OF the evidence
entirely another question was hot alleged by the other
aide that this confession got w by c5asoa bet Sesa
the wife and husband If tha. ai!csatoa woe n.Ie A
would b. matter Cor hejary g pass up
II wes true not disputed that tue saieaeut
Of the wife were made IN good iah nor was l. disputed
that they we're true. The defence did seek sbox
that the prisoners insanity produced by
sion, but that he Grained cup Of DlefDcss nei and
furnished to him by the hand of the wife, which mghs
well account for the madness Of any human peog Codu.
g. referred 70 vol. A. kernan, 652 10 decsion IN the
New York Court Of Appears, Ia the Of the
People against EASTWOOD lie held that IL this cup
Of bitterness, though FALSE esantel
10 irn by one 10 whom he bad right ~ have
DdeDoe, and It IL hurled reason from iD throne, Il
evdelc, III the case. husband not bound 10 iasg
tate Aal INTO the truth u communication made bY
wife Ih< husband who acts Jon the Information his
wife is net responsible for the truth f~sty " that
They offered this conie~scn HAVING nst,sd
madness The mind OF the hasbsnd and having led
hin. 10 oonuk. the act for which he stands indicted
wife nfop med husband that she had been assaulted
inautei IL the s. rect ana the husband rushci and
"a an att sy viii. the offender hurt Killed him. would Il
be held dat the In isband 10 be aeprved rich,
of giving in @. 'iience tho Communication ~L,ch
led him 10 The commission OF the ac6 IN the
case Of Jsrboe, decided 10 this court, hal noa
prisoner acted on the statement OF his sster,
anu was not that III 'srsay evidence mlah thar
-. n.