Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1859-02-01

fQent, ana that 1t has been Communicated
70 him. this, Scr, soas the trst he Pyesiidsz,.
had heard Of H. sg3 i6 40
Our Secretary OF State.at once dispatch.
ed 4 note to- Lord Napier, asking a solu-
bon OF the mystery. The answer Of his
Lordship IS loo good 10 BE- lost. After
promising in a very elaborate manner, be
comes to the point, aud says
ssl eoncenafhat what The Earl " Malmes-
bury intended to convey to MI. Dallas was
ms Lord NapieI had impaired. verbally, 10
tsasx Gsss she Seas5aL sense q protected
been instructed Il nerstats W;th N;cs,. LAO
one Of the objects Of hich Is to Terminate the
Mosquito protectefate, and to which no OBJ
e csa, was expressed ey the United States
vi have NJ, h.a ~ 49,. s.
personal COMMUNICATIVE With tbs Prss;a.. p1
on This subject. Id 50 far d / aia informed,
No Ife q LAS e yet been concluded BY Sir
nar ila Iofs nuseley with any agent On the
III remain, NV va i 4 n, go o., ,,,l,,
\ NAr,ss -
Sir, is not this too m,,,cb. Does 4
need comment (? Does I Il b(of s.sneak Ia
itself, and bring to bear iirres;;s,t,Ible testi.
lnony to show what i have Inserted that
the Euglish Government L. oply tampar-l
ing with us In this natter2 Whx air
the English Secretary Of Foreign Affairs
does not even3render to- eur ssoa1aeity the
small tribute If rssoftin, IL { resnsctable
"subteFfuge Id the premises On the con-
trary, he seems toE hare taken son,e Mains
toI have singled out the yeriast nreter !
imaginable. Ono miobt alnost ~ ia
toA believe that the Earl III Malnesba, )
was PHILOSOPHER deyotat, Ht,I 3 Sam Is.
teal INQUIRY !; and that instead If IRVINE
to settle the Central American question
with this country, he was really Ell.
gagged ID 8 profound iiiyestioafion 4
discover how far it was possible to impose
unon human cradnl;tv An ~ e NJ. !. g
= ,.,.a..t - II. =. ~ y a Fl =
=. psot gu siiliSS tloni euclL Y piomacy !.
or. y not even dsotonlattst,agas it is
triIaillg with us to the last degree. And
with this remark, ! dismiss the CON
sideration Of the second proposition which
! have advanced, and which Ihave en-
deayored TO establish and ! now proceed
to submit the third, namely II
TIM thts treaty, aptekher taken IL The
lE'sgtash or n re AMERICAN sasse, coatra-
vs,tes sctdt ought, 20 pe the settled policy Of
0ts tournament a,a relofioa "a ase efairs Of
-Sse. -aas efteaa eo'a'tafe'sf. 3s. Is
.b That policy should be. sir,ito assert
not an equal. but q paramount and con-
trolling influence over its affairs, This is
Popularly known as the Ao8roe doctrine
And though not precisely As enunciated
pr him, yet, sir, the position be took on
various occasions are fsirly, legitimately,
and logically 'dednclble from the principle
] have laid down, and from no other. I
say then, that IN calling il the Monroe
doctrine. DO so cor derately, and that
l an. am utterly regardless Of the carping
cfltlcisn 81 the historical Pedant whofails
70 70 recognize ING same fundamental t1 Prin-
clpte whenever : diiierence 81 circumstan-
M happens 70 require e modlhcatlon or
a7anIletsne hpPileaslon o. y.
! twill be observed, sir. that the first
article in this treaty, which i have already
read TO the House, is fatal to the policy
referred 70, as II binds both parties ssneT-
er 10 occupy, Or fortify, ors coionize, or
assume, By exercise any dominion over
Nicaragua, Costa Rica. the Mosquito
coast, or any part Of Central America. I,
Is not this deserving the high ground
which our Government should take in
regulating the affairs Of this continent |?
But, sir, this treaty not only comedies to