New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-04-15
NJ. sau,o,-why DID jos ero.s svs to -. gceA

".
vIir,sss ruJiosry vs. tIo I'd bS having -een Mr..
Kew posing abosr til. 1ss Of Mr.. saekks
Rtbe,s-T .s@ n, Key there sreat member Of
o. He spte.r.d to be mailing = Business of it,
Hiipes.1Y.., sr [sashteIl betseen the noIrs 81
I2sId u,usIy fUuI1 him here; !: appeared 10 be
qui e regular bnsicess Lsugh'er
The c. susgestsd that tina eoar's Of questioning
WsIe..FTbe Saturday three daJs before tie death
Of Mr.. Key the last time Isa- the hsodker;nisf
waved. -,
il tbe CITY o. NsrY o'k. IN paSslsscA Of insuue
tiors froa YOU Breezy obtained CERTAIN lock Mr..
Br.dy baIds lie slt6ess sesed paeksss the wItBess
br.sEs the sesl, opens the package end produces a
O From vbool did you procure tia. lock
Mr. Csrlisle did not zee tae point Of the eIsnirs-
tin.
Mr.. Brady simply wanted to Identity an article
which be wOud OfsI 10 evidence hereafter.
WitDetg iosI tilted { lock ard sad he procured II
from Mr. Wsgnsr, Pennsylvania aver ue o2po.i,e the
Treasury Department who took il from the door Ct
No 3s3 Fifteenth sueet.
Jacob WsgDsr examined by Mr.. Brsdy-I reside IN
WssbiDstO / sm a lOcksmith; delivered tais lock
10 Mr.. Brown, the last witness took It of house
in FIT. eIth tTeet, No 3s3; II vac John Grs5, tue
black mans bouse; there three foar gentle
men there when took y of Mr.. Pendle,on soc one
Of them; ] se~ bim in COuTt yesterday; | behave be
yss Member Of Congress; the c1lOIed boy cane for
Il
have seen sons Of the senlemen 10 Coar; vno we're
pr.sept; the colmed man paid NE for taking it of.
o. Nhs. Was sait on the occasion. Objected 70.
Mr Stanton prOpo..d 10 show that tle lock was
taken q for tue purpose of oestroyitg evidence.
M Ould said If that vas the view, he had not the
sIghtsst election 70 hsve the question put.
Mr.. Stanton wsnted 10 know whether il gas the per-
sops engaged IN the prosecution VINO tried 10 destroy
this evidence. Tsere were two prosecutors here;
public pro ecutor and private prosecutor.
Mr.. Carlisle wanted 10 know whether Mr.. Stanton
me ant TO be understood az intinatipg that he Car
6sl.) had any knowledge Of this stemp. TO destroy
esie.sanseel
M Stsnton-Nore in the world; God forbid /
should believe you would do It,
is 40 exceedingly grave case ard must be conducted
with great deal more regard to dignity and order
and decorum than has been observed hitherto can
not permit this.
Mr. Stanton-I ask the witness what asked him
before.
Judee-But II must be done in ar orderly manner.
M Stanton, standing IN the aisle, between the
counsels table and thinking that the judges remark
had reference to the tone Of voice in which be spoke,
said that if his client was kept away from MS counsel
he could not avoid raising his voice. His client had
no. heard half the testimony given where ne was on
trial fr bis life, and he Stsntop had not heard one
fifth Of his Horors observations but took it they were
all right.
The Judpe-I am not Directing to your tone Of voice.
That is q mater Of taste, with which have nothing
in the world TO do.
Mr.. Stanton--lt lie a matter OF necessity.
The JuOge-Whst objected to is the manner OF
doing business-tbe Interruptions that take place.
This lie mighty grave affair, and ought 70 be con-
Quoted with all the prophecies tna belong to the pro-
fesson.
Mr. Stanton-The circumstances arise from the ne
cessity Of the case, in view OF where am paced and
nobody feels more seriously than do the response
bilities tina. attach themselves.
To witpess-What was said about this lock at the
time. and who said it
Wihess-The colored man said it.
O. Were the other persons present at the time
Hitness-No, SIR.
q. What time was it
Wtness-About III o'clock.
Q. While you were taking the lock
Wtness-les.
Mr. CsrHsle-Were there other persons present at
the time
Witress-Not that know of think they were up
stairs.
Mr. Ould--I understand that it was proposed TO
show that certain pereons connected with the deceased
had given orders that this ock should be secured and
kept out Of the way. l have no objection that that
fact if true should be given in evidence, but the evi
Judge-It must come through the regular channel
Mr.. Stanton, to witness-I want TO know whether
these persons were in the house at the time
Witness-They were.
q. How long were you engaged IN taking 1t OIL
Witness-Ten minutes.
q. What door was il taken of
Witness-The front door.
q. Was there another lock put on that door
Witness-TbeIe was.
1t being now O'Clock, the Court adjourned.
In the District Attorneys personal remarks on the
counsel for the defense he dsclsims having intended
any re Election on the members Of the NewYork BAR
on the Rev. Mr. Haley who the person referred to as
the clerical supe. His remarks applying to them were
merely Of playful nature.
II will be remarked that as 10 Mr.. Woodbridge ard
several Of the other Witnesses branch Of their test
mony has been reserved and they will consequently be
recalled 10 the stand.
Special pispstch 10 The N. Y. Trb1ne.
WASHINGTON, Thursday, April a. 1859.
George b. Woodbridge is now on the stand, aud
question has arisen to the admissibiiity of his
declarations about the adultery made to Mr. Siclles
on the Saturday before the murder. The matter
is under argument, and it WAS evident from the
frat that there would be much heated feeling.
Mr.. Stanton made strong appeal, in the course
of which be alluded to the thirst for blood displayed
by the prosecution.
Mr.. Ould made personal reply.
Mr.. Stanton rejoined, saying that he did not
know, nor did be ever wish to know, Mr. Ould.
At this remark there was burst Of applause
and stamping Of feet throughout the room. It j,
the first quarrel or applause that ba, occurred
during the trial.
SECOND DISPATCH.
WASHINGTON, Thursday, April IA, 1859.