Staunton spectator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1896, 1859-02-22

OOK HERE FARMERS OF THE VAL.
IL LEY!-As agent for G. H. Mccormick, am still
in the REAPER BUSINESS, and in due time VIII
have on at the usual points, good supply OF the best
Machine in the World. Please send IL your orders
early. Beware of all protesssdly two horse, center
draught, and hinge machines; they wont DO. pre-
sent a few certificates below. Read them carefully,
A''u ! ADO" ''' v ' THORNTON BERRY,
Feb. 8, 1s59.-4mo Agt for c. II. Mccormick.
yindicator, Rockingham Register, Valley Demo
crat, Spirit of Democracy and Tenth Legion, copy.
Mr.. TuoRroN BERRY-DEAR sIR:-I procured from
you Mccormick Reaper and Mower and have used
It two harvests in cutting my grain and grass. lts
performance, take pleasure in saying, fully equailed
my expectations The Reaper did its duty admirably,
even in tangled heavy wheat, which, when not entirely
fat cut it so clean and smooth that raker WIN an
hours experience could place the sheayes so snugy,
careful binding enabled me to dispense entirely with
the use of my CLEANER
The mower also did its duty well-my meadows be-.
ing covered principally with mixture of clover and
timothy the work was executed up to every reasona-
BILE expectation, ROBERT GUY.
Mr. THoRToS BERRY-SIR:-We are free to certify
that we used Manny's Reaping Machine portion of
last harvest and it failing to perform as expected
procured of you of Mccormick which performed
in all respects to entire satisfaction, and especially
in down and lodged grain it far surpassed the Nanny
Machine has more strength and durability, is better
adapted to all kinds of land and weather. much easier
on the horses necks-not injuripg them at oil and of
equally light draught. RoBr. 5. HARNsBERGER,
Z. G.. MooRMAN.
Mr. BKRRY-DRAR SIR Il think it due you to say
whether or not approve of the Mccormick Reaper
and Mower. / unhesitatingly say it is the best ma
chine have seen. | was of opinion that the NANNY
machine was the best until gave both fair trial.
free to say that there is no comparison In
the two; the Mccormick is much more durable, cuts
| IL 40 1O1s a
deal better cuts more IN day, with weight on the
horses necks-Manny's did make their necks so sore
that they were unfit for use for weeks after harvest
The Mccormick scythe is much the easiest ground the
machine easy turn, while the NANNY Is very hard
| In short would rather have McCormicks at double
the price. | would say to any one wishing to pur-
chase to try both first The beam of the Nanny ma
chine which is made of wood, sprung three inches
The Mccormick is made oi iron, and wet weather has
~ 'Hs'' upon H. Tours Ne'ps''t /. J. pAnxrss.
| ;-At rules held in the Clerks Office
of the Circuit Court of Augusta County, Februa-
| ry 18th, 1859, Samuel G. Wyman, George II. Byrd,
John II. Wyman, Thomas NJ Tolman, and James
Henry Martini Paitifs; Against Thornton G. Durham
Robert W. Kearfott, lately trading partners un-
der the name and style of Durham Kearfott; John
P. Kearfott, Thomas b. Clarke Alexander n. Taylor
and others, Defendants.
The object of this suit is to attach the debts due to-
or effects belonging to the nonresident Defendants
Durham g. Kearfot, which are now due from or in the
hands Of or may hereafter become due from in
tothe hands of the other defendants or any one or
more Of them, and subject the same to the payment
of the Plaintiffs claims against said defendants, Dun
ham q Kearfott.
1t appearing by satisfactory evidence that the De-
PENDANTS Thorton G. Durham, Robert W. kearfott and
John p Kearfott are not inhabitants ofthis Common
wealth 1t is ordered that the said Defendants do APP
pear here within one month after due publication Of
this order and do what necessary to protect their
interest. Copy Teste.
| Staunton, Feb. s, 1852 JOHN PARIS, D. G.