New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-10-15
SUPREME COURr-sFEcI.L TrRA.-OcT. lL-Be.ore Ju
DAVIES

SUPREME COUhT-sPEcIsL ltkh-OSI' Ii-be.'le Jus
The CUBAN THBEZZLEYEST CASE.
Lasopia Csmmer L Co sgt Jose NJ Pie.
The defendant in this case il the young Cubsn VINO
arrested by the Sheriff on the charge Of deapdiug his EN-
poye in Haya1a Of $1,000 The s3cu'sd in default Of bal
application for bis di,charee under the n'oyen at Council
fr The paiI s filed objection, and demanded Jay which
,5i soS e tu ss for Giad
RECENT oPISIoSs.
Lofus Wood sgt. Edmund Kimb,I.
ISGRAHAN, J.-MotiOn is made TO set aside an order
stsyns dns' upon referee reoI; ana
gnt me decision q an sPp, thstson ,ss,S 20 sr
By is section E9yS'd Ia; no. ?. 95sI ,;. = :;,y D'
Jud oqi Of Court esSR' %, 90 P , ss . M section .p
In Lo,mer SGT Lord a T. D. Smith s the General Term Of
the Pleas Judge Woodrua delivering TIE opinion q y
20 amir this question: and he the conclusion ha, the
section did apply orders yns on sPPes
decided other grounds understand th,s orders
heretofore been made in Ibis district similar TO we present
and seems idle TO say hat the same Jadse sitting 81 ne ,a
in specia Term and Chamber may make an order vad
be states be made in Court and hs, Il void nAie BY
him in Chambers Ye. such the con made IL the Code
and sustained by their decisions
a. DO barn the parties from re9sitn. them either
to have The oictI made y TIE yuose o. i % n AZ
not bodDi Court on notice TO me oh. parry SEE no ss
., following these decisions and requiring TIE party 10 Obtain
The motion granted but the proceedings stayed % low The
deepdsn. 70 his application for ssy unt ne decision
Of he appeal Such to be ioI iodA5 Costs ABIDE event.
David G.. Halsted agt Samuel Sneeden et aL-Mo-
ton granted to place case On calendar for tat Friday IN No
4. A. De Grsw sg.. L. Jove.-Two csses.)-Mo
Margaret Cooper agt WIN. V. b. Ccoper-Re-
fsrres 20 Ulsbaf,r Esq to report suitable amount OF al
, james f Brown ct al agt. NesYOrk & Enc Railroad
Company r, sl-Mo.ion granted
Same aet. Ssme.-Mo,on denied without costs.
VIM. Murdoch sg,. Eliza A. Empie ct a.-Moion
for ~ sale Of premise. granted Ga terms.
Aug. &. FrsDsiola ag'. jas. Chandelier ct A-Notion
ui.A abide
Before Justice SUTHERLAND
Thom.s Rae sgt Peter L.nzer
Motion in behalf Of Samuel r. Rignter, as subse-
qu.pt Judgment. creditor % Set aside judgment
R,I.. .se proof Su shsI tn. - 81 So or any
other was paid BY L.nzer upon the note' % ,e.
Is probable On proofs before b the Referee TO cot
conclusion TIA be;seen Rae and L.Dzer the parties 70
Rs. vs uc, lean, bit fact pym-n. account Of me
| note. ord operated g. uch Of the JUDGMENT.
Bu RoseI took the .snuen; of TIE 1og from Rse ard
payment, other P.yneIt on the judgment sapns no
pa. Of had been paid AID before took assignment ana
paid oIey Rogers c.ed upon L.Dzer told him Rae was
deou. Of selling TIE judgment: 70 him. l.see Lsnzsr va al
sht ard whether par Of the same had been pi md Ian
zei reply stated the. the jadsmsut oil k: AR thr 10
par Of bad been paid ana IA, ne Whole thereof was
These fact, disputed AID there dOab tia, Rogers
bouett Tie Judgment ase ook the assignment. AID paid ne
L.nzer could Rogers the psJneu; Of the
500 paneui AID discharge Of % much Of the JUDGMENT
d. think that be could enable Richter 70 attach tie jag
In the hands Ros.s soun. Of such payment By COZ
T.. fess.r JUDGMENT 70 him, klGntsr
This motion then be decided irrespective Of he qIe'S
q fat referred TO the reieIee AID Of the pools aud ofa
| Of the referee thereon
The statement which the Judgment confessed Rse q
clearly su Gent except az 70 the as. note n.nt9rei trei
March o. 1855 and tas - % fr moneys PAID b. Rae for Lsa
ard the so So for goods sod sna delivered By RAJ L,n
A. these items Lne. t5e decisions which CERTAIN
oolfctIt should tnk The Eserent insult ard defec
tive The amount r shich he stated and
the time times VIXEN ;he sooSs sod delivered ard
Pac S 10; stated i; stated 70 whom moneys
| paid
But TIE s;s.euer. which The udruel. confessed BY
LsIze 70 Rsh;er equally II defective. IL setting
the consideration q he notice The tine time, ee
moneys osn.o AID goods &c sod stated ifr.gs
ss Brink, l6 How Pr rs Chsppen AT Cb.pp-n K-Tnsn,
| .l5 Durham 81. Waterman. u New York Req.
The VIII h Rghs judgment entered belas
detective be avail himself ihis Of he defects L
tae sA,euer; waich ;be Judgment % Rae co1.ed
The motion Of r gt,er mus; D. denied with 10
W LsIned for RICHER; Nelson Smith fox Jason Rogers
| sssgnte q judgment sought 20 Dc 81 aide