New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-04-05
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT Co0Af-A,srL T.

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT CoOaf-A,SILL
Before Jodss BKTrs
ISDICrNENT AND PLEAS.
George Drew snf Thomss Campbell, OF the ship
ROBE, Wake Il the hip Autsrcic, charged ~ith
cruel end utu.us runbm-ni, pleaded not su'ty hoeeri
WsIer OF the chip pleaded not guilty to the
.l6sp TcNepy, Of the ship Etiwso, pleaded guilty
70 tse charge CT s"sat with saspeerou weapon.
SUPREME COURT sP,cI.L rrRs-APsn before
Juose iSGRt9As
Ne~Yos AID New Haven Company at Schuyler and Others
Tie demurrer argued IN this case lno,ns tho same
Of deuUter prseusd to toe Court N TIA de-
If ii. dsfeposst Cross Up'n the srTmsnt OF ns de-
srT-.l TIE Gsu.r, Term, tn Iudsmsui b-o- vs.
pas tre iudsn.r. below we're reversed cluc-ds
In tho op delivered that occasion tue Court az
rts "a. aueb pressed before 81 ao Court. iimeo.
b. fr that thsy ds rot oood,r 'ss o'h-r a'
submitted hem " stated in the o-nnrrsr On zoe eon,s
~ ,uppes- taat they you'd not have reSset
dgusu in the favor oo the demurrer tne
Gut might ssye erred o. the 1e'loh " " uls
they not ocrn satisfied that tho - aiot
cttAId 1000 aye OF ,eiou 2lst I- oro -
Wound iHpfop-r Tor J.ots OF ois Court 10 et-fenea
e-eisn Il tn' Court Afgss % saI tasi D.c.l.s or'sn
or- that oed b, he Justice delivering toe opinion
would decide adversely q t's decision a. sen' tae
ana 10 cou ee them again vis. bos quest with
suty recognize and TO follow the tcHon st
h. ssos their decisions as SiOdi9s aod coaca
lei therefore Constrained secid. TIA. uoo. the quss
pfn.d BY h,ir d-mH1es 10 the case 81 nhaepe sna
Cut- Of The qu-.tinns pfsen-d b. 'he oth7f Sc
uuI.r. only fo- ID. ce,'Hu Of me Court Of A9ps
~ hrcfs the compliant contains sntcept cause o's
ton II tno.s Srounisa 'uthoetto SaanIs Jids
The Other q. Gud o, denuer. do not, er.n
radon ~ u be vel founded
An oberton tai, Of tn. demurrer. {, To. dsSee.
tot $50 parties necessity rske 'uoI de-
The scion not cosn-no-S 20 iutntfrre vita their
bid b. them a, ss'tsd b, toe pAata' aid syennsus
tins; they held ths ea stock masus th-n Sc
hit.
II it, The the any other rsr'ou, should BE-
found q 10 tse Ease plaintiffs required
them dsnssn' bg not io IN" cause that theJ toIiths
spo,brr erourd % demurrer stated behalf OF hs Me-
ctafic B.k. ILs IN. scoD boIs BY tten and WHOA
u;h U be s',tiled 10 ne 90 tn wa os1ss IN aa'thef
Court hat toe d, should b. ~ tbs, Court
sdibs that fue % D. Pc, II n. sas zero tins Only
s.hIdsut' docs pot ApIl, bsre Do tiannint N, com
plant T. viii Of the aons brought IN
tvs Court soo son. IN h- sup''c oat ~ you'd os opet
il such "1es $. tue dstsn' ants mu't De "a oe
brrs ufh stion IN either 'og and from tas nsces
10y fhe C0ut could eDJo the Judgments pending
T. Oof Courts AtJ olrf rce would enable one dsina"' 10
oe ga. the sho'e pS,crs"hE
County The ButeteT. aod Drcyrrs Bark 90 NeNfors
h,p ~ n rhed Upon soo~.ps that the 1lri Of Ap
a.cisou msd- the demurrer of Gross 20 as
az - u r.i-''g frs"d the. aeo.a az n a.ssp' 70 g.,
a.. uskec distinction TIA. the Court t1sa tiolsr
IN. ch.cs .uo upon a. n-go,ab and tbs rules spp.os
40 A L itc-TpS rs, comp.oy
d, e.r,i6.d ., the cers who was .l'hon-d %
Ger II, ch-cs The money ia Tao bank ~ tho cn DIT
sf n hAbiit'y
Ger a'e WI hout tar o, 20 meet u 10 ,aoh e,,s
lo..y,i their distinction hi certifying check 70 b
geo suipg false esit for s,oek ~bsh does not et
let and csIIo OF D. orr.~e SID s-lds IN h' oPaSa df,~'
IL. osbo'eL b.tstB 'fe Nchaic' bank csp- abd NE one
Tr foo ts- t,.u.s tar dosaaest uS5u
-ch ~ ' arose sas NOT LesotaN se A'o tas oola
oD CheiJ ce O-uo n tas case Ia Herman. ott
So ~, 1-p pl.iais. --h u ob..n jpdsn'u ds
ca ~ f.,- st "a ..sd by schuyler TO s Of 40 'a7 snd
TIE - be y1a na', a-s.t To. dee'"A Ia DO case
Tt.uet 81 not recognized valid and repre-
Il fTUe 20
j. It's Board OF Decr, could DO, create sco asos
Dol - ~, ~sy ave CITY Cannot b. pretended thu;
an az.t c.p BE- .thorz-d THAT pine pal
b. does fIo~ thar p-rsors pno have ,as.rss
from Of .s.Dt. from nesiEenes or f,ld
may al ou the opAi redf-I' 70 tns mes aus
tam tatfeot How that Iedfe 20 o. %
sns6 80 DOT b. au-e 10 n-ie nor 20 sle pna %.
rePrsb- Thos- sarstors un,s ., uraL, .i.e upoa 10
p,Terl.r c.s, ana n. e1.ms.ton Of each c..- ~bi will
s~-.ay b. nlds souic 20 present. tn great dhcJ
~bcb ~ re upon the trial Of Ai cause ssaln' all me De-
rhe spp-. b.v, tows..r oont,, 70 ,,e &. ,oa
al IL, pro- y brought, ard usr~'t~d hH pro
pri.ty u co. f,r Az To dsc'On must ysa
'ss.u iot ,ss si,ah upon dsaaurr,r, viii lss'.
u. ce.eld.lts 70 3, s~sf OF psJneu, Of costs
Before Judge surHEELAsO
uEkURRER TO CONFIAISr.
John q BoIg sE George ID Baldwin.
TIE plaintiff bed ella a. arsDs on cOo,ract against
th- 6.i,posnt 9'off- B'.d-p, sHd QUO william n Af.p
~Eo eopr'B'r. sOe'r 20 tn4 nsns ct A.n s.a-is
=. S,5 80 ,. Jsks 49,
s.ssn--. beus-t .sson Ia .sk Court on Tia
ea aud issue beng loiHst thsfsin
t. set.oI lotto. fyr tE.! q Circuit
bsdsr popotsd 70 th- pNntn, .ctt as aAsSee, a. ne
ss-l; 10 h. 81 the sction aad n rsa
too subject s.I--pt Of the SUIT anf
settled y ucIGsat being ed 70 b. entered Up
ce,-lGs tie seton fr iSt IL In plrs1s1es
conditions Of rft.tso sxrseIeE-
,lsIrc INT ott~e.u ire psriss
e. II. sfr.su,u. rip1lsted 70 enforce We eo
eeion Of tie ucGn Of the ste property Of Ai.m
pr perry OF Baswtn and 10 Gee Al asfl
y er.egoU ane Ps'osH,s pr0eesdis 70 saioee
the eoet q ls Jlc;usu5 on; OF the properly e A'.a.
bsern ssesc T. psy A4snab, N bslfnoe uA7Es sd
Luuuls rot srcse|nf esq % or .ny frh
Cislcy whom coax rot Dc col ee'-d oo o.
ADAM, psY Of such dhcetcy, no. 'Iceedies
Ses 81 s,dsn = f-lessed from the J1tfmvnt
III. csmssint In this sher slssoI scctsnaly thsss
ssttieusL, the ssr.>msnt u1dfc
sn,-rrd al onatht ssoat b. toe
fraue I-t;1s The ts AMI ci'clmssra s1t
t a.,c Of Bshv.s % show :ae fraud
tla. Aasu. sne BALDWIN kOe~ 1o,Giag
tad h-su CT coad - Co-c.d although sr.cusa
AGAINST hIE that b.evILs irsad hrs. si,csy
cred by tse pain Ii vb>n he exsecti1n
issu~d LAT Ead~n and 10 rrs7Jruee ard TIE
ccgls have ee,a saf coGA De collected Of bin;
st- 81 tae ssioa,
.suste ,-iion sod and ra1sfefrei
thai ibe ssia Adams Baldwin isssb,si the
plant i1csn.I "a tse Of rs el, ntees.
, tier, OF from Nov. -, iss6
On th,e f the psi1s ,shs IN bis eopss, .hst ~ ssd
spGs,!cp see a-d declared n1l and
void ssd fer noh cher relief the Cozr. hiak
Gst
tt se.tdsr. d.uun ground the complaint does
stss IA u sUHcsca 20 oorsut ia Of seton-
Ne eueson and tie oely eso, sed b. tks as1rrcr a
whether paGtid tie asxnss ef he jsdgnse. merely
coDdEs Anssas right he discovery Of The sEd 70 bring