Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1859-10-21

tie House would !sii 10 have its desired effect upon oi'
H. Rev Fathers because could not be passed with una
uirly. II. occupied position Intervening between "'i'
assumed y the majority and minority VI ;hc Committee
W. are III IN favor uniformity in oar service: We all S'
live a' ~ change should've made either direct or By 1T.
y..irr Eu, - woui :.r L.. any ra.s vote Of
,f-c I.yu Duf fa.,cGS IN God I" Whose opinions We
= ri r.y .!c,r Difference even when We dissent from
inn IL u e. favor therefore u changing I'll" rrso-
ui, 4. 20 take :r i al! Implication 81 c>;-a'r af ~
l-,I 10 ,a-.j; i'-. would listen l. n.
Tie speaker v.-!rl, r""u At Til 7'c day 10 appeal i
III. .iow any root OF h:irrh"s 10 'Pf:ts w
amongst a.. H. lad been panied ~ tHc n.pat- u! I'M
II - Ia hear t, Ei.loH, ppHnily 'iohsi o - benz
far- IN favor rrsnaaiiSe. lie lad leaTt them POKE.
q hire in terms that nsiyr o; iN body "oG'i a. A.!
e.r,n II uttered olt,l IL paid 81 tribute 10 H.
r,s If IT," Church * ET..II being 'iir "a. "!' g.
Nil,a Car'a: aud w." b admitted TIE attributes, "'
!,. .s'rgrr, aui aay &istln-!i-, ;:.siihr'> 81 We
len! profession, .l"uld lee .eiHri1'rtJi ' $500
the l..r tie rdr lad IeaGr! tn' TIE Prayer !"'"'
& the ii.lr,l' who had hur"tH io.I:; ,.., ,,
I-. Mr. HILL should VOC a:aU': ~" i''' .r''' ""
r...! H.. Id !.wa, Ial.g Il r'" not - max" an| :'c
,u. our,r. o :" the ~ !!u;c Bishop % lbs own !"tt't'
H. Therefore. h. Nou! take thai coF-" IN r'!a'h ~ :,
rr,r n hon r. @ :.rr.. nUi he take tie ,aiiG course
reference 20 lie action ~ al. OF the H,Noi' ui tEc ,uit'
!ia referred :, tn r acton ~ The Bishops IN "i'ptn;
thee r-.u:'!uf. three YEAR as,. :" show u ~ it'c 'eD'h
.r. ~, - hot hastily adopted pn He'r p"T' II vas se'
.Ib-rar. .3f-Ae ration: and he III! H." heSV' 't ! IRE
~-u.utyf. reported ~ H.. committee 'a' passed a'i
n.ou,y * word h.:" 'uy net upon '''' n9Gy' VINE "
IG IA fc:i IN Ia, spru .U: w. % root %! h''er's'
etwrrr tie ~" bodies. i we-.l certainly I've ts' 80 ~
.i:,d 2, rli..,. H. 80. ": all 'asitd 'f hf
. u. tie Ei,l"r. PT"pr: one. "nb should i'T
,. o;., among .;i.Ts against the rr.".Gi!"n
rr iuiN.EEs o.. Nj believed il-!r never VS. =
,rr,.irinn f,,t thu, ::l- c,ur" puIs;ei ~ tire
iIp..r O.! bishops. Icy had exceeded ir c"T';n'''h.
.,:y ana he Ia favor %. .-,.:in: upon III" pau
VI Williams II "a va ou- q rhn- '7i' i'ri's'rl
Tia, IL. Fra, or fool. iu.ir :u' the C;Tc, ana ;'' ~"
ILwr,h o: she Prayer Boo Ne hslle,rd hs' L'"Er ,
ai.h; Lee made "a ous services. they ger" d"'!r;.' hu
4 III, !Io-c passes tL resolution Tha' vs." b. TIE ei'"
n any c.cr-yEa Ia mnac. 10 lis 90. prAG,c'' ts
chang. mratiour IN tie resolutions o t!'t House ~
l.. Jag sat. ., that Size House Of BISHOPS were -i'
U Euuli;y tar 10 change. the passage OF n!' fs,'-
lion on pLI: would Ia change ''i opinion nor 10
,,r.rr, ia H. .uI"n ia" bishops did not their
,fgu ;,,y a:y q, .Ig- she Prayer E0o. nor "';rii
q, raal. uuy ,ur chang. Ihry mrIr! r"rf's,'h ~
lra j. ,h.y have - -; 90 ~. 'I ~ II con.I ".''
,c il, proving. ",a- '!".n'i 20 overlook u" cor
,:a,l u h: rrc,h!;tg- III ii'ust "oh.i hh'' "r
upICuu,.l rgh 10 rNlIrs- iha! orlh"r. "r any one!
rigr ul,u ;l sgHr sui jet II 81. .'is G.tit" u u" -
A. preamble this reU:u'i"!.. ;.rf,'nr, IN ~, oh"H'
.,.i ,y,,a. w., o., G,gt, rIi u hoped t'i' House
NIL ,o, l.. .i..y a.: tn s,iy 81 niGs VI :" ;ha;
uo,r iy such oppression 0! "iir'' lie Moved ''' we
suhitc, hy indefinitely postponed
Nf NcCgADY >a!i this gGr-'ion 'td conc proper hf
t- body L. w.~ To" e "NrT,'"A 81 ~"
m :,, a: y member Of I, body that 'ir' Ia been M
c,r.r 4 III Ei.!-ps, hni u = h'i"r. u ~ "Ir
Jou-i Tie Constitution requires i,d ~" rr'!"F I'oe
81 H.. used. Tie ir-'A'e i a.. Old ti:- I'll fray E""A
,y. t.t rll.rr Lad been :i'rr. u-ts IN t. c'@''h i'
,y;i, ~ he Constitution Wa. that ~ ~'F'!r"' -. TIE
, ,rl! he, IN ccnr,lauc- with u" usage o; the PRAY
- ,;.n. lw.s not therefore. mater VII Gu r.Gli De-
changed 10y IT, mere rares''"n - opinion sro" W. F,F
FHIFl .a 9.
III. Ir.,!it, action @: h ~" House, rs certain! - u II
' . chang IL "a lAu.Utg" 9; tie Prayer BOON ls,l'-
rtri...i IN tie hr",fp'sl succ" SION oI tie Bsh"'
Iir IL, belle, -. li,a' t.c: were men ":o more 'f any
,.i,r. ar fable 20 .al Who wluiI TIE s-rat tHtIy V
sr .r lire. {, greatest rr".', a-"ins', I r"' "cIn,
do vii, ar, l.-, -, .uh1ii'y Ia ' church: liz 'iI
rl ,nsrr.or.. when L- hr"EL ih' expression % 'Gc'
oru,1- A. TIN. i:>i~ could 800; err The I!"T;E hi:'
,l. ..,. ,'iu, 49, IroHeI; !.aris"i III" church.
aud IL brs.nr'e- ; IL" sIur ""n"r:.! "oi''i
:lrn :iry ,hcnl! Las, voice "a Whatever change are
MD in IL r..:.:,~, II tie "ray,r BOOT.
~ ur CONF Nr Williams having "iihd'aNn IL r!''
dion =; ,.';an., offered th" following. IL substitute JOY
,a.. -.,Iir:.5:. reported hy 81" Committee:
where's tie preamble AM resolutions ti''. ~ .,,'
I: i,io on the 1T, day % the last session. 81 TIE
,r r.n,,,p: IN relation To The TIE q; the li'"s q"
,rnn;. ia,rr and r',hci Ia tie J""T"t! o: ~" >h'
CONVENTION, have hen considered ~ -"Is - sufficient
,.uuI Iaf Gi,turl.nc the uniformity q worship "tth
.l7rlI rr,ra throughout church. AMI E'r h'"G re-
iyrI IN yT!ou, parishes wfuI authority To- de' ';;',
:furt!r Evhl.c-. c
E..o!yr The l."u,c 4 L,op> conciing. rhti Canons
yII and NINl o.; l>I be- referred To- JOINT Co''Her
81 ,iry, r.,> 80 cIi.!sT III! report, ~ tie nest ~,
;.l C.;y.igu ~l notifications If rar ~" needed IL
....i aI0r, It:
,yrl.Er