Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1859-10-14

making the charge but hc would ni when hc CANE TO ih"e
hi, examination that he had relied more upon hs nsi
nation than upon his proof The c.hrr then rse'fi ~
.i 10 the several Ia i-l il charge. ~ -
The ii1u- o, Bishops had Invaded H. F:s "i hi, body
st,:r,!- reasons why, in III orior II. !!ou-c Of hhri
had not exceeded ;hrr proper "E'E't: IN ''I con
In Trere.cr 10 ;lIeuI ~ c'ints! aty i!.r.',o" "
IL. ri.h,s % the Clergy, ,-
In The instance relative to the CATION r 'r the rlr.
nose ~ Application 10 Bishop ivt., the E,hn'in re't
10 rcl'.a, IT, had provide! for "lTTe''hi
greater rN"U, than the Clergy Eut. snl.insihE Wy
are IN rrr n rr.in. 20 concur with this House IN ref.,'
inr t., canon. examination ci the canon i:st
.Inv that :rr .",; could nor have been AL nta,.""
~. ,s II ,i- lIDu-r rs'-rn: 10 IL" refusal " 'e
i,-,a,. %: ..op 10 receive into his diocese c'tiE:
,, La ...,, ait! proper credentials h- unhert""h 20
AN lf., il -uri an instance lad occurred wa, h2' l
al u the i;nl,r Bishops. and would not Ice shnSo
I.y them lie told ~ gentleman That t'e t'o ~
tie correction "f tie rvii became Jaw III sP',e ~
i'm. = l.op. nr rather because % their failure !" '''
rn Aud esali.e tie House Of bishops had rehal-
IN TIL hurry ~ business, neglected 10 att upon .;,J
tur' II !. charged that II was Their iGtrA'.on ~
5,, The ri.rr. oi the Clergy l. tha The c!hif! NHt'
,r. a, Ch.rars men, should show our hr",rr me rnh
Lad not sustained by single 'ii;'e q" eihI tr,
n ,b,y had ,:rl-! defeat the measure "oGld "' we!
have acted uro; il, showing hat II they "a ~" "' '
il vif.,, 4 certain iiuir i would become q law:
nv d. Mead -aicd that in ISL. the House o, BISHOPS
r..f, 81 .,ch a caou. In $50 they gave similar tA,2
III, eoly IL >i:' they again r"!.ctr! canon .! 49,
.rr lon, Il wa. asccrtainc. by Bishop Hopkins thai 'he
r,io,. ci 80 h,Sn: been given TIE Eo'y' '' III '' "
b COMO q law. ,.,,... 81,
~ .,r Church II then ~ GAIA ini al! GOO NOW "
:, acton og The IoG.r ~ bishops. although 'H' h'''"
r, he An error let ., them credit i"r that h",''s
lie va in of the principle d" III" "meM""Sh. IL.
= ,o, ii, f. .y, ans additional power - the ftose ~
E.hor>-ir ..u,ly gave them the -ih 4" ''!'rac uP
an SUI hicn should be- m them from ti' i" W
,,,.I he. sane way upon which they ar" 'ener,'""
noon b,r. The provision, it exists ia ID. Co''tG'i',
their Inu-comcu:rcncc within ihTcr !a!>
T. r!. rs.,ar~ 81 the law, va an anomaly W ".'
,i,, yi legislative bodice AMI u placed tlc ''i"t
illus ia..,d in the l'"s.Go" o. he'"hllu- ''' NV
"n,ion Of AL the E.,hcr. Of the Church. lie could
r.r the Convention the opinion. Of iu"n WHO t"i''i''
viii y. Sro., ihuIu--lvys, IL opposition !" We 'h.nE
Canon. Ia, 81 ,ar church which ,H.!i"l I'cftt'', '''
Tim 10. liz. Ii.Eop. % tie church H. would r'!rr !"
IL - rr.iru Igl;us an example e." WHAT "r'' w
,.. %: the father. OF the church ir'a no s"o"r'H'",
v,y the i.hn, should be- compelled t" give their rea,os
for uon.,rucrrrruCr This House J. :" act for ''>ei "'
,ri-or wI.cl. satisfactory :" itself IN" r""h "N'
may lave acted upon il mines II The Ei'h"r-, NAY
ru, be- such Will ini'urnr" tins !i"i," A,i II In!
b. Impossible give the reasons Which ",''i "t',
,ar Di.arp. House. onr Bishop may nav 'o'et
Tor one satisfactory 10 h.n'eH ana aA""i !
have ,y-i tie ,l- vote. hu; !or anrt ~ ami HE.t''
reason and 50 on Wis. I'LL tbs Iion.e ""r; ".h I!>h
o., l,,.u:... I- waited Rome o. them
Again: Much dissatisfaction had been oppressed because
II - Non, .c Bishops sit, wish closed doors lie believed
after much reflection, Mat iE"ir 'iine WIN cc'ei s"u
va. ,,lrul.,c! to promote the boot Interests oi Tue
ClurrA o:,a' The very fact .: hey lad almost IMAM
uvl.y ever since the organization Of the 'i"rch ~ ,'
country; resolved lit with closed doors, would OF .'st
when /, reflected VIA; body {" men ley were ain '"
,uu,u r, ,.r!. devoted - tie interests of the church o.
,;u! Lc ,u.,r-m maxi i presumption !"r Ian l" say
that ilcy -huIG =; N'th ''"fs "f''' eve" u "' ~ ''
i,... R.!- UL,g'ai.
m. sneaker t,,n met and answered the charge ihni tie
I,.u.f H. .,, " .!r an ire ,u.ole body The! Ar" re-
fl m IN. ncrc aud hat j, the only rc,pon,bi.!
a!. Ne hui,rd would ever lee required oi then" ne !e
!y,rt however, tntt the amendment were l;a'' ~ u
present shane il would n" Certainly secure Tie l"deeh
h.,-- d. M. lIou,, And imuuch ~ h. "pui pas y"
a.:dp,.nt 10 the Constitution which wou! not hr certain
-. Il, application he preferred 10 leave 'hs "'''S " "
Olcr CrI.ycltiDI - determine"
r'- principle cf IA" a.l-Idmci p"pr"i li no. "i,,I'
"a. G r furn u v.r i : presented dec ''' u ""
uyt 4.Inr',l
Mr Crr'l.. Of Ky. SUPPOSED il world 10, be In orie;
to,r,roure matter. Ate i'ne!'"r" 'nis he adopted
Nj Yys..r I'D be proposed TO r!sc' i IS III f".o'G'
.ipu.. 49,, ,,
House f.0, Tie Committee tie Conservation Of Bishops.
.rpgrtr back ntoUia. g! the Bi-hoi, elect VII"
resolution declaring, that such '',ilin"".' '" I''
-i.uci hy Constitutional MAJORITY -! .'f'sA' ana '.Hs
Deputies til, iiou.e docs 40" ASSET" 10 ~" CONSERVATION
r. r.",ian ", adopted! and Ordered % he transmit.
m. Scr,a ,y.: ,f, co.,n, q IL, House offered Ike
following r"-"u,i"n
oGcc Of III. nr.a.i- cOu-,rI'i!"n of B.o-t 'iaI
D.. accounted compliance VIII! ne Enhfic winch require
tie realm. otte testimonials g.; Ei'hop' elect u She r"ti'
ue @! ihr .2naiur'-io Tie st'c Ice "H'1ri ana IN Ie
lead tie ccriitr.p, q t rrr!r, a secretary Of IL"
IInu.r IN Which they were given respectively "ndh"Veher"
lUly .isurl by q constitutional majority u"Ir"i
,nl,,ru "a. made bs two or itr"" ,H' .,'r- To ie
adoption 81 Tie Tc.oii" and r!r Secretary "harr" T.
III House tr. rr.ulrl the consideration Of "a" or'er
ta.. liGur. fH y aid IL" debate had aken very
wife r, ebrtci'. many i-suc, not connected With ~"
question before tie House. The real question - whether
IL. amendment constitution. ii, no" iroiOsrd "!si
rg;.:rr upon - !i"u." nf Ehor, power Which they d"
ru 20. ,. and whether It ~ iS" rom this House ay
,..c:il light wic'. they now r"''e's II either rtsHi'
J.. accomplished ly rle amrniFn"'. l." should s;renn'
oU,ly oppose - adoption. .,,
I'M en- II h.. possible TIA: tie rights % Ills House will r
cs.r,fnv Gti,lcih rs rule oi order ia respect 20
~; 81 tie .cli"E ut one House TO u" "Ge u
rr~ r.h,. u Til. House depend upon tie 't!'cnance u
sIDl.ll ,,'.k he II l:is
hang upon slender thr"ad On 'h" contrary The rf"'l
puin IL, Constitution, Il how exists places The l"G'r
Of Ii-loI in a T., lion aicrr ;-y may decline Z" 'asc
auy direct responsibility, hg allowing nea'" TO income
a I,w hr their failure 20 cNrE''s an opinion.
II appeared in Tim tia! the change nov PROPOSED wa he
..,ry 10 .,rurc symmetry in H., action " IL" ~" Aoti"-
WHY .,n.lI .gy III; Er'.nU lee made ~ 10" provision rrs
la, the action OF the tEo b"I, I" .I1;.." it''
IN. import ant tu: ~ consider !; ~ .i"" ii the "u''
Of U.hoI. rs u fair minority, haze corr to rTcn con
c.un t,or. 4 particular question, We should hc SATISFIED
~. , T., r-.I!-. ni them reasons for i..r action
,l he a. I'D was That tn. !"rs" should he placed upon
an r.uaI,,. with the IIot." of Bishops What as0n was
IL, to suppose That IT, "r,r %; bishops would re''r I"
a,' vran any proposition. than there j. 60 suppose
ia, m. I!n'.r Wout r,'u 20 act upon proposition
eorlIr. from ne iinu-r 60" f."' He would not expose
IA. Independence III, iour. howcsrI :" any question
81 construction t"'He night ~ us Il"''r 10 Initiate
ffg: or any other r-h which they may possess and
he SATISFIED therefore ipr he mFS,e:l', !" a'%r s
,ruun.iru Of III" gentleman from Mississippi Mr. lcrSeT
Nr Evan ri Md H.,- perfectly satisfied, from the dis
,...on wlc! lad taken p!ar" ul"u tie GH'"l iia = :
pU, conclusive the amendment cannot pa. iir should
.,.rrgr. before hr iu"E III move toiav the whole
.,leG, on The table H. lad prepared another amend
m,i; which he thought would "hEht" tie objections which
a., ,o, urged and sir. he Iuad oGrr when ti- ameu"
rri vg, disposed a. lie. therefore, now move" - lay
H.. whole subject %. 81" ;ti!'.
Tie question taken "u! ia" sui.'r' va 49," On 'hr
table 49,, ~. may-, 80.
riAc" or NETTING.
r.y yir. Talbot. Of Ala, desired oAe' rr,oiar"n
lis aon for brin.ig II up before thu morning session
closed HAT h" had been Informed that s.:er" men
f.r from the W.. would ra:r the Convention ,"r ihe
w.. IN lev la,, lie was. Therefore. dc.troUs Of havinS
tie matter disposed 81 - soon A. possible.
T.nrrort 81 the resolution was that th House informs
III. House 81 Bishop. tia: will adhere To it, former r's"
lou nyu: Chicago TIE place i"T The ii,ehi q" ~"
next Convention ,,
E'v Dr. Stevens. q "a, m"Fci'" 'n'h 80 - u ''H "'
a Cnallni;cc Il Conference.
Rev Dr. Talbot accepted lie amendment
VIZ Taylor. Of Va, said hi, House had MOI decided ma
they do not III" action proposed Ia the rcN"uii"
wa, 10, IN acc"rd'nc" with ,'c regular Parliamentary
vr TI,iuher. moved to amend ~ re."!yin. that ,-
u conc,r in III. resolution %! The House Of Bishop, i
INK Philadelphia ;ha place u tie heat meeting .! The
NJ T.y!or. II Va suggested tia: y regular mode Of
bringing ", the ,u!"r, would be- that Tie 'som he
House Of bishop shogi l." h'.t called rp aud read AMI
lien the question taken %" ''r"t'is ia lie resolution e'
Kew Dr. Trlao: sal he ha objection to Mat couT>e,
and yomlI therefore temporarily withdraw Ids resolution
The n.,-a:e ''rn 'Hh. ~ AMI read an" ihr que,
,.,, ,irv on roucar. 'i- resolution hNias Phila!c
Inia ,le place Of tie new "senc "i ih" Co"T'"oh'
w.. decided ia :hr negative. AYES -. r"r- =,
Mir p,nGc;cn Of ohiu '!r;i moved Mat the House ad
l.r, to L. former resolution.
Mr stanley Of California ,, ot the Laiiy wished 10
N "a. alteration Of the INVENTION or two c"n-il"-
rson. i. connection w ;'. subject. lie believed that
II Won hold the General Convention At Chicago 70" WI
NV. a thinner attendance 'hau you have lnsi Al any Other
Convention Where '.u ~" delegates come ffhr: Iah"
Gr,f he. coming from o." Southern and Southeastern
o,n;ry They Lave f- ash a; the Sckly .cH'"n al the
year AMI AZ 'nr tin" - ~ i.t'i"S 81 ,'r ''nEshU"'
h-y viii h.. sc,"urrns IN the New England AMI Eastern
state. They would pa, through any t..,rn ci'y on i",!r
VA, hone bG; hey would 100. - by C,r'so AGAIN, Il"
~, not say ar,uc 90 81" st'uhIiiy - Chicago. but