New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-05-26

a. 3t Il tne cly i New Yo's aid Rob- w Lesoe d.
cr,, Iii, p-'pian 10 'uscs:.f-Iy offended VII ~
,T.D-S III tfo l-t - tie P,of- If 'he sac It We"
py,,r of this c.,yl may b. .,b.. ted n hi. i,s
Tue psr.. ut it sain"i 'he7 wse - ep'rsd ~
he san s.f1rnsy; they NOT entitled " III sine Rial
end a e2, F5'' Tf b. .t .I pT2 B. az 20:
~ h. Pope ~ u" Sat Theron tn" p" n ~ an ilill ~
- lefv =. AID ii.H by -hr financial SCENT" T ~ m
in lis csFs"ry a. ID ~ D, AZ Pay ~ ~. -,
If he Cont . n~rli Term ard With the order '.r "
Tsr DAVE. on Is ih Il Msrrh 1851 Thi. order mae
lp.n -, - rs is an iDln-c.i'n .rlt p'o-
a. ana 10y ro'i aside 'ha, injunction \; '
md 4 ihr odrr Judsr Di.r arr i.s' = ids; 9 IS
.rki ID" voris ,he relation 4 wherever
tie .airr ocrls in . said -,u.plaiIt'
hot any asnd he complain IN
d, For rad been made, tnl made "a" Piriie. ~
:tr,s.d had ro.i,, Of The application Cn dse q ~ "a
Cour, a. spccial Term modify order Of
Conf i,,eif G"Is Tenn If ne tn-n -. p1-
ron tts decision % single .s,ice Eond appear b. u
" y solid II b" auu th"u -ls, pert Of ne order
Judge D1yic. which amends he c1mpan. BY a,rrs the
e OF the SCI: ant in Ia. ch'n-n9 he parties ~ H. W. ID
ri 10 mater Hol eviu lGfit The order 81 'ls
C'l o. rrr r'Fin fn-t b" complied win in al - ar;io
by those sirE bn'hs i'u T. ind do no understand
pslcr win tie order made a. General Term eN s il w,s
.red by tie or,ro Jujs Day~s At SIee al Term But D. it
II i'h Marh 1883 and action brought ia compliance
il suh aci size oosi A. General Term decIeed
might b. brought NJ Io" is proceedings were stayed only
tifR g4gTa Ia ie ec';ou Sd > De Dr. ta lud pa iii
lie llih of Sep 80 brousb - b. ned Dr.
he ID. Iu the interim between tie order OF he
Gerral Tenn II Dcmb T. '8j7 snd he ,s Of he
10 I'D H. 80 r - - ~. b9 ,ii1J =.
nave sanding in Coi'. Th NY vitality ,hen .t in The .G,
pr,,4 Viii he !r5ded tL. re- lnem TIM order Of
Drouher 1851 emPst,d or Authorized The bringing ' Al
acton By The people Il the s,de IN which
hsy had ilprs.l This question cannot, phaps be-
snsrss Language Of Nr Justice Insrsblm dismiss
ing BE- plal in The acton bro sh by IN peo The State
Even coneedps" be say. tina: tine action may BE- nsig
,aifd in the the people restrain .uicps CORPORA.
tor cer'ain have atom adopting
clns,n proceedings b. carried 20 the
which it ,asf to h"m in ihis acn. However unwi.t.
cnIIorson nsy intend TO make neither IA. Ao"y ,iieril
ony payer has IN my Judgment any right % interfere By
III, stprrkspJ ciec.iy d.pos-s u whl rcmiiu,d Of
lii r yir.g il the n commenced Gnder ,he order Of Dec
T. 8i7 and rauode.i BIZ the ost made az special Trm d
March H. 1853. IT, By IN. So -an isne Of ne ~
p,Hc Count iec rendered lbtqleuty :" the order Of De-
ctS her T. 1851 ara subsequently The order Of ""rea
directed b. brought could be- uar,liyed wha. becomes .hs
prpoon hat the vocation On 'he 10" Der Judgment IL
Te jdgu,rt Of Judge Trgrsrau dsmns The con p lin, in
the action brought by liz, he order Of be General Term Il
he : 1851 has been alowed ., become Gna by he us Of
he PARIS Eight hs have ausped since th plaintiff; had
nIice Of the entity % rio dgge., AMI lppel hl. be1
On review d al tie ptteeednss which have been hi4 the
Courts upou Ii, sub,t { the L1wDcr claim, and careful in
yesties,n Of ~ lie concurrent erc a,es have hrsA
ton N laying ti1t 'Tr no ea' Pin suggested BY way
Of obj cDpn IN NJ Nc k"on' spnrt p" y17. 4 sufficient
Iiille make l. iLc YOU fIrher this
NeX1us bgatUr aid nd thJ opinion,
moi she s ground u'u viii 20 b.d tls rost poverty,
sik' hpe that you I'D succeed in etus l.iIe the -meut
ihr sa, under t. There navy other consideration. II
ga. wi, which wtlll r.nlr luy such proceedings "a W.
Mese'n contemplate utterly lr-s The dgnen iisei his
bttn s9ifd u record "NrP a5 To- sos p II IT, Tn deed,
d5y apoy.d by he Counsel the Corporl.iJn, has been
sI'G BY the Mayor SOD recorded in the proper ohce
Tbo L. eaurr auth ulrd The oyyi, Il mi nece'
.ar the TIL. 10 tho aus in The Corporation and the r..
hcrsted action ofihe omnn Cinci in pp' ct M coat
VIII oh they With MT o Der .Dreversr To at
ten 81 now u inrIpJ,c any power which is suppose uay
oP non would BE- futile would BE- unns,hnble think
duty the premises simple snd clear The property OF
the Corporation ought be relieved from tue lien OF the
.ae UndeT execution.
r n,yst heartily subscribe 10 the doctrine laid down BY
do hold their places independent Of the Common C1unc
and wi is legislation is no IN vosion Of ney nave No
p3tce obedience to such legislation because
hey may unwss or imProvdvnt on me souary my
" only IN me esitiIae dschsrse Oh thsif co
m, ccn,mn Council have ordained again and again that this
ella IA be- sdio They have .he esa right ordan Tue
Common Council have ordered not to cooperate with any
binder is sdustm,nt but by ersry means IN my "s
10 did In psng such result They have the legal rsnt
w ,be ns.opa and for those which havo presented
lnih ana because in the legitimate di-hars OF my duty
sbordira,e cic. OF the Government nave no right or
POW rfu,- obedience such ss!ion decline 20 Coz
eisin
am uinndfn thai this determination may expose me 70
unjust cricsus from the ignorant, the prudicea ana e
vicious but hall find support In the co1yriioh ta 'n
who lack, the moral courage to do whit he thinks
WA greet respect am your obedeut servant.
hiCHARD Bus rEED, Corporation Counsel
So the case Stands. Unless the money Is pai oy
DE- cenber property to the value OF millions VIII pass
to Lowber. The illeg atty and iniquty OF the whole
business clear, yet the only officer who can stop
The expensive and suspicious job fatty refuses 10 do
o. and strives with ull his power against the city tue
Of which he is to protect. The claim
an, must, therefore, have his pound of flesh.