The weekly Panola star. [volume] (Panola, Miss.) 1857-1881, 1859-05-18

X =. sra,w
A 49,
~ - ~ li4
= - q ~ ftaf Atfsf
#Hz<I =
20 HH - IsfztN~
I Il - HM4 Hs No.
p fl 4#le tN tty
fse amaa AZ w ii
f#Fs Hst Ae HItAt
- ~
~ ffH
f s m
HN
FL #f
tsf ts
ai base
aH Mf ~
HfsI 81 H' ifs - nal
sfHf f NaHH A.
HH Hf iHl ~ haE q fifa
in as A Fa0N Al
f "a fn n ihs fY
ff4Hs
NNI FL Mas fNNl
mHIi f NJ ifs Hsasi Hafs 0i
aIia 44ft FHl if h4f 90 u
i.HiiHl - ffAa hHa ~ aa ila n
1ls iaE ihss fsaii. ~ as4 a h'H
~ mashe II flilf lis hHatafi
pi So 4fHsgiH M 3 H ~ Fhf,
HstlH# iAsf AsAif .Aa #iHH ff IA
'fimfHfai Tlfflfas, flHid Na fiftnf
nlee1, II IT, ifsafIH Ii48if credit ii.
tieisn<e sai Hflnfe Hli - e AHy "
~ %f6aaii5t should iHii fhsf fHsh e
fisiHaaH sHa fihsl0hi ~ safilig lhH
ihfaHllhi, 'hai ih8 pHfahastf e1uli
iffH Ahsiffi ihe FHa M sffsmAhiHl
tUI1fss, ~ ihti y va cold ih Nggl
ilb ~ #aafamahial fHffafs Boo gpta
ihs gihaf hand, " . minister n lHs
nlfrel IH4if4i n notorious lfHnkaii.
should etIl afaa 70 druggist ~ \ lgiN
N y He, stating that 10 sas 0asiftd 70 ~
ufei faf s%safsnanial pnfpasas, y NDuli
bH Doe natural NJ credit siah statement
ani W such eaae. soluble TO- iht lnfy
in eaf, shaiIHf me- falf ne q upon fu
representations, was IN good faith afnui
nu1 tiefe Il ~ frnsHn 10 iauhi Nh1i
ihaif iaelsiou would be e ounfae u
wuHli hs a verdict ~ not guilty. Hut, Il
mar b. suRFesled that the applicant
fluush nj . divine, mr., perhaps, y
miemhef u ans rhurrh, y yei q man "
good character for truth ani yefneiiy,
God That i be- should slate ~ the druggist,
chat NE liquor wHs desired Tor modiclnnI
purposes, that this wnnlI BE- sufficient a.
warrant Aie druggist 10 selling tho spifil'
upon BIZ simplo statement. What a "
not mlholoni proof, 4 not q matter
easily defined. " = apwething Ike lh'
question Of fraud. whia& the law. writer
have never attempted TO define precisely
Fraud Is fraud. Il may be proven u
many wsys. Sowftimcs ~ circumstances
even against 1iWtt proof 10 the contrary
10 u y n regard to the salo u spiritonl
hquprs, for medicinal purposes, 50 called
Tue parchassr may be II general goo,
character for truth aud seracity, III
may say be wants the liquor for medicine
purposes, when Il Is bought. The srllci
may prttent that he believes this goo,
mnn. whose character for truth nnl
Vetacily, hna mover been questioned, nm,
that he really cold the same for medicine
purposes, when In fact, /. was well under
stood By seller aud purchaser, ,hat nj
tllr,r mu,p,aery about It, being Tor me
dieinal purpose, WAS n contemplate
ssb'rtiuge, " transparent evasion ord
Law.
In Every casc you (uo, the Defendant,
. are " Igtstminc whether tho fact, an
circumstances ~ attending the sale, wcr
such ~ we're -uihcieut. IN ycur hone.
opinion, to have fairly and fully Statistic
= the seller, thai the purchaser wanted IN
spirit., "a good faith, for medicinal pur
po,rs. II you arr AZ satisfied, You Gag,
uut % full q bill 10 b. true. uthcrwi.,
u your sworn duty TO find i true.
10 my late charge 70 the Grand Jury, d
Oxford, | was - unfortunate rs TO D
3 entirely u'isHpprchculcd upon this sui
| Jrct. II seems that ! was anderstoo
10 say. tina, the seller was responsible 70
what the purchaser might DO with III
4 liquor, after the sale and delivery. ThI
was, and i tho reverse Of my opinion
The seller Is no. responsible for what
Purchaser may 10 wiih the liquor. af,s
the purchase. Thi. would be mos, M
reasonable aud unjust. cxcep, tbs, N
: ssl.-t u not to allow Il TO be drank in HI
!. (~Dcscniants,) store, or on his premises
hut Defendant or druggist. sci
spurious liquor Ia a quantity less tina
! ~ gallon, aud he relies upon his pnyI
lsge Is q drusgisi, &e.,to .sll such Iiqac
for mcdi ai1l rnfposes, the bgrthen Z
proct "a on the Defendant, ard, unic.. /
{ proves to the satisfaction VI the Jur'
. that !, was sold in good faith. for med.
sinsl purposes, tho Jury are bound /,
y lind him guilty, or comm, perjury in r,
} fusias 10 enforce the Law :l'rcsidcj, II
Safe had IN the first instance, prOsedth'
the psfenisu, had sold the same liquoi
In alsss quantity than n gallon.
al n tho Defendant should rely upon
license to ,gl, u dcvolcs npon tho y,
fendan,. 10 prove such license. so,
: the Defendant relics upon his rrivilcr
, ne q druggist, a~peshecssy, or physician
he mus, prove that the sale vas for med
cinsl. .ssrsmental. or culinary purpose
or The Jury u bound W their oa,hs
convict, anlsss the contrary arises out
the evidence introduced, by the Sta
against the Defendant.
The State does no, desire the eonvi,
tios Of any u her citizens, unless the
are guilty. Hut on the other side, n
State does no, espCc, twelve men 81 u