New-York daily tribune., 1859-07-02
SUPREME CoURr-CIRepu-JuLy Before Jui.ea


SUPREME coURr-CIsevIr-JvLy Before Ju'.est
8OvLr
col. COLT srFD nv MS AsAsrEssIs.
Fdwsfd 5 Boyd AT. Ssmrei Cot'
This was an action by the plaintiff 10 recover
pnyse secretary. s ana
marian tn deudn' durns 1854 aid for lD % ps,.ss.
Tie plaia;is in the defadant
vice. stated In the compliant AID syerd that the .less
s@psySd u rt:.I.e,e;y Of 5s s;si.si q L:.dsa,
be received amount aud de
asked gmeu' Nernct psiu:iH for e2 ff5 o
Eyereih Bea fcr Plaintiff oeoise u. saseaB, fes d.
ielosnt
THE PoIiCk cAsEs.
The People rel Thomas Beatty ast The Board o Police
This moru!Dg the Justice directed the following ordee
return hsvios been made to alternative mandanas h
& 3 . @ and A md % a. s.gss sa
counsel for the respective pts aud doe deoerston hsvn
ape n,s anS p.s r 70 as
9TH 6h 9Th sh. 9 h. lh ard li,h srtces brsocaes
coneo"S upon such .sion. Seiss BY the respond
,he g'u, tine ,r the Fel.'O to epy or depur having
expiration q five days from The date f this order with eery
either party en- nCcs N case % pss q. m,
ter hesrus pon enu~ea,ed mocp 20 be heard sas
DECISION.
In the petition of the Indiana and Illinois Central
Railroad Company @ the removal Of Jane. nsn N'''rsnd
OLD sCHCiLEK FRAUDS.
TIE New York ard NewHayen Railroad Company A' RoSe
Schuyler and others.
IN The matter Of the motor for an Injunction In pur
susnce a az ord.r 70 .hou cause.
SUTHERLAND, JHsyng carefully examined the papers mo
meo in This ms,ter aud duly considered the nsumeasof
counsel authorities cited sal merely state the oonola
Fy,, Tbs, in the case Of the Mechsuc. Bank as The New
YCi and New Rosd oomPs s Ss,sSs ,s
the Of capital stock limited and allowed by the char
ys eS Sct'o o s b sSs
6de parties and that sction sssinss as
tnn or rrpre.snns .uh AID holders Of
such oe6css. entitled to any legal remedy OF rees
hra'
hods Thereof .'oeIhesd~. hAa tn. 'sA' % '."os
SseHd That h. decision to the essn, q holding thar sh:
oyer'sue was absolutely void evea ~ ne nsnas OF nl
tsssr S.9 ., which, S9s o sasa e. the
. BaLk the Butcher: aud oiovcn Bank tsh New Yoh
scaSs there wa. ri. res, difference bwssn hr two c.sss
ans from difference in the acts and the eonsquences Of tho
corporations which and the effect and Of
the Court could have held ha; the rdsut should MT bs
permitted deny authority of Schuyler make sad
for the purpose q conpeIlps dendsr, rr.p-ad
d,mss, the ,heoly that the oyer.oe was ienuio without
legislative Imitation whereas hold IN the assio the
he esseae ftfe teller p The hond q bona I'D. hes sas
should uot be permitted deny the uh ot the fact certified ~
the teller compelled the corporation respond f
e certificate officer wiihou, involving any such
,raortinary eopsequeneeo OF doctrine 90.
he omnibus suit called IN Seeding the qges,ioa' rs'd
he cs Of The C5s' r. 70 the se%Ss'p
m the Mechanics. B.nt ss The Neg rort .nl
,s. % 1L - iOS r. Stn,ier b.vepd the IS cc1 200 Of
esps cloue. upon the title Of the genuine s.et
porsion bae properly . o;ou the osncesioo Of
al .ri ard had prop-fy sds parties
fsr m the action All The numerous holder, hs spuros
cert,fcst.,
thus
aimed BY The Court Of Appes. fI Of
the plaintiff restrain by TEN
o. sTy nuncop spy action or against plaintiff
upon 4 such spurious certificates s-nuns fo
lows
Fh The Ger having rec-rsly h-t
AID decided and on appeals b The p,inh iion seysfs "a
azsL
- a .s ,h. nan,ld prior
- -, of md of
, -, ~ ~ Sr ,hi. ,c,Iou Ia he sourou. soI
~. is, bs,ny MADE several orders restoring
- ieisi iincti,r othss ar further ioaaeon order
-, ~, ,o az ~ he this action
- -. !, r. e. =. .ctions agsin,t the plaintiff
-, t "a he .rd,r 10 .hov cana, must
Pr s s' l' - -, a., ~ o. ~ ,b- ds.r I.nt. In
-, "a \,
IL A. ~ - CO. '"'' - ~ 'o'
.o ol,inh Ia
,b. action prior 70 he o. th aouce ns1 e.
smh,d the Pesam - Il suen Aeons nss 81 IN.
'len that a. o. nen we're @ p a "a ,l.a.ssr. d
NHyOs cuIts .. He ,hoiJ , 49, "a an =, a.
stock msuns5 In the complaint 10 TINS action ana gn ~
aoeoapi Of when sooh Nsrs youeA.' s% g. IN
PsLtlns ,t'ftin tn- nfn,' oi 80 sb S,.rrs
or .f esd m sns4 actions IL such certis.,es are the
cI.. a.. A. orouogneed bv % Court Of Appeals
s .,s 80. oa 80 Ia - p y w.
follows decidon. above referred TO- h.
the defendants this action who thu, comm need us
The plaintiff in ths sottn or 70 the m ni,
action should b. restrained m proceeding IN sich su's nn
the de'eTuI alton ~ 'h acton, the cecse {" scck on of
q which they brought n TACT of The cAss
To which cl..s Of ceide.. made sed isusdby
sehuyle the void genuine, Is settled W the Cpor OF Ap
ps the heates socount Of which such suits were
broush, sssnr the plsiutia beons the very question !" o.
f@d 81