The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1859-04-13

an tlnt
!, hsu, Inv he memory Of % so5s,, hs uu,srraot
grief during thai Dc remembered night, coost
tases the bfes Which that obasm, aud con-
ntc's Tie homicide with rhis sa,sen' AZ one OF we NOV
ing or supernducirg causes. wbere mat cur'au 70
do VIII the law 9ssune an boui OF The day as perou
behind which We cannot 80 IA our inquiries anu ap W
which we can 90? VIII yOnr Hoaor matter O. ia",
say hat we shah take h honf VI ton O'Clock 90 tnat SUI
Gay morning., that shall question up 10 that time but
shan not 60 behind III Why shall no, go 70 the noar
whch stood before that aud the hour stood be-
fore that aud 30 till trsvei back through the vgs
OF the night, and come 20 the very moment when the
t.bnfts oil thai document poured INTO the OF
that afflicted and distressed hshanof II throughout that
long line We have Ia trace back this homicide
ing cause, ask what principe your Honor exclude
this statement even though may have come into beog
few hours before the OF principal factY
Has come 10 this, that the accountability Of tho deyen
shall any other foundation than the working
Of bs own sou At the time be committed the act ia qaes
scou IL despite Of The truth aud in violation Of ali ias
ct Is the Law become bed where the principles Of JUS
uco are cot on, or heightened, go that the cruel
Crd, proposed here may be inevitably accomplished
That the question before this Court. VINO lighted the
asmc the breast OF the husband we now propose TO
stus The mater as are always tere they are In your
Bonors hosom they are IN every man bosom aoa o9iy
rrgcre the application Of The torch 10 burst sao CON
peIe con,sston Il the wife applied the ykcse to the
consequence of the avcwa aud confession OF his dig
boroT, ark, Why should this husband suffer- Nhen DC
obedience SO the instincts ct his nature, and per
passd act for which he must receive the approval of
evesy intelligent ard ref citing map This anguished
uan when he was interrupted the first moment Of the
act rTned those who nteifered and said The
bsyt SLAIN has ccitd my marriage bed. Although h's
VIE ia bin the ssory the night before, she told 60 him
tItn tne told Il 20 hm every moment from the time ne
ts hafd down 10 the htppeuing oil that fata event nef
woes riugng 10 bic eefs her statement was beoe
Re her body was polluted 10 bis presence These are
ne fscs which seek 10 put into the acthe acs for
~hb sought 10 obtain victioD against MIN before
VA set ans sIy 1t seems 70 me, sna' even
val 81 twelve heen hours from the occurrence OF the
TACT the nevertheless the evidence before
the Court ~ the sobbpg ana wiliDg OF the husband
psn Of Tho act declared the cause which led him to per
eaeLSe 10 The t.L,at Of the evidence
Tie iifssSt Attorney roso to reply
The Juf se SUI gestea within ten minutes Of
Ne Lour al Adjournment
IRE pspici Attorney merely wished 10 say that he had
unacif cod cffopcousy hat the application for the INTRO
nay .n5 Me- gfoaDd OF psoyocaou, and that he
hAa coranea hns.n exclusively to the point with regard
Mr. Hsdy-we stll adhere % this as the only ground
ABB pfoss f"f ~hch The statement offered IN evidence,
end We 90 hot propose 10 invite of ~ engage IN any Ola
cusf NJ tF tos the question Of provocston or tne
lao ~heb esnos That Ife,ess that we offer thus state
hit sse.ufvsy ommuucation made TO the accused
sEtps hm 1" that condiil"n q mind IN which We alcse
he al The tina. Il tie dco &c of Mr.. Key.
Tho inspici At,oin,y-lhe material question before
I yow Roum h ~he,h.r n 10 contrnded the Other
Es,I,s ,xri,smert by this communication, or tnto a
s.s's ct tsasy nhe TURNER ,h'u the course of argn
rtrt ne part VI the United states viii BE- very dlffe
rent from shst bss already been understand that
Ar fun itat Beng the allegation on the part OF the de
I lthtti n@t ttAA VIC isf4 WIS 'pso"n into stHe
% NANNY. n 4 y cont pded that II threw him
str Of cxcism.ht even a frenzy, ths, 10 be
tht t>atsrion p,fegfee have butterflies to cite on
that uLt shi0h would be perhaps well enough to put
I icto itr lo~Hsfsiou ~ tho defence.
NJ faoy suggested thsi this not proper time for
ths yrecu,on - decuss that Poin' The de.ncc 10
gard testimony Lo~ orscd. rcltsed ms Honor :
ing thu of DAY. WHARF his Hoaor went into the
fsncfsi qussna "a issarty rnd also into tue b. olter
gusntFt that ~ the II mind; condition OF which
- zoe MS HauoF's language, being unbnget coun
ffrie ~ whsftons Crin nal law, edition OF 1857
ffetdf O., and a. who're under tn head of Inform
tea gelg o. make ihe to fdes If ao act !, is said
shat hes several auslnoaaons the rule BY which
ehcb acted. wtetssr false, be.
s'ms tnjcea u gut, aud are material and original tv
esbce.
n ht~csme necessary prove that u had been
siici.o M headache shish intense affect
he reasoD ihs nnly cay "a fhos would be By hs own
No, All ,he phs scisns the world coad
tetnlnc whether man had h.aaache or not |. could
or,ls b. kuown nv b- statcmert The writer
on eeidfpes, IN oOe q the sscticns quoted says
Tia, l.efs arc ornn anicstions addressed person
vhoss ssnry aspu.d hens scnn~cs.d In evidence With
trr W tls .si lc for the purpose show
tbs ~teher BE- sss iossne NJ ma
what wns toe rurt her,y u tho condition of Nr.
skklss' mind; and What DID they pso,cse " rhowf
The canfe exciting that mIn1 10 coudition
~fh,b made hun irresponsible Tor his acts.
tou nsel phi several hypo,b'tca illustrative 81 the
bsressy Of aiustus such eyliteee, sad quoted Judge
tfs~iefas rung Ia the NJ Day and Jas boz
Ihe Court Al burned.
The wtos ~ the confession IN In Mrs Sicklcs hand.
vrure IL 10 panty and distinctly written, and bears
little any evidence "a The Rni cpidatioa
rsrara 10 tne fenninT If such paper.
MI hsde, "a Court 10 cav, sitting bcedo and oc.
casonsy eonicrsng attn The counsel fr the prosecution.