New-York daily tribune., 1859-07-01

COURT or COMMON PLEAS-spgcfsL Trps.--J1Ds D.
EeEyf. Judse
HABpAs CORPUS CA-F-AFFECTGsG sCEsE.
H. u. fla. surlicatiou of flfrAfbsTy

=
H. 70. tL. spplcation Of FhrAeb,ry.
This was apphcaOn oh the part "i the relator on
s~' II hsb'.s opns fsr b' custody @ sister nsnsd Fanny
Cosove, so' JeA' oi ago happafed t''t me " si'
oTpIans the applicant being ms'rrd wonaa Bsns 10 -
doc"d circumstance TIE sppa,, Pcaed "f 'sf' Aan.
ago when shr bund by the Supfia .nde4 20 a
r,soem II suebbong s'sc with whom shg 10 md c1n'f
i-s.d sister back, ana obtaned wnt of
WI'n ihe .msArod Coan the shove f.ci. were
show1 ai.o lhs Judge stated ' p" n' ,' WIN
would After Liberation, Fahiy decided % g.
IT, induce nor to atr he1 d."rmidation s,yls
ihs, she would give comfortable hoe and a., the part o'
.sd for her 70 70 the aud ,h, If
Fanny with hr sbc must do ~ al once b1, h., size
pleased. aud she Mf. DID no. wish - eIef
s. sny oot,o The sister this time bad hold a
a" tf" % sS sa d, ssS rom S & o.
born The sister, however wen, after her Calling Fanny ey
name s,ing back, until they were ou,site
of Coui Subsequently returned. weeping and sad
heart d. shorty le'i the bIding with i.r husband
The wrn Il bsbras corpus dismissed
John Do,le iof sppicont john An,bon j. r the Orphan
OisrsaL TEsm-Before JUDGES DAILY, BR.DY and Htros
Bowdrn agt. Collins -
BRADY, 1.-The defendant, by the terms OF MS
lcsse obliged pay until the premises hired were
put tnstab. ofd'T ana coudpn Tue pinnn proved BY
Pcck at M bou.e la good ,enauibo sio'f aud the he
Ldsu proved that chimney smoked, but whistler from bal
nu u no, dos' S spp nor de- tue particular ~ es'J & 81 hs hs
premises IN any otncr respect unsnatsbl ana the "g
dsuc. stated sufceI; fhe smpsiDs OBJ
ecred 10 uism have pr"'.i'd from s'"c lHn 90 u P''t
b. defendant should male out hi. defense beyond
The shec, of that oi The sitnes. P'h rho sss
builder whose testimony positive. On thr evidence the
uosns properly given sud canno; b. die
.T unwsant"d BY wait oi suhiiru' pr ~ 70
sgbint the Eright oi evidence within ths
iue Appobe such IL IL Ieoes-ay, however u con-
tider i've espu. ~ taken by the de endaht
Ia I'D O favor
The below action brought t pre-
vio, nouihs Of pr.ml,.s Tue plshth Object
g CouIt .heuded tie rcofd Dubt-ss tbc defendant de-
ed IT, establish by this record that his i,ense ali T. that
trpaad s sn aud ibh. be- ded becaus' tc
@ god order condition. but the f-cpfd
ppl-Iy ,clud.o II the offer ~ tine Jsdguen
of order 81 H. that tnn pfrn
psa pat intp truantat. order o that 80
plaintiff alter their condition sc- that ids
thAk the have been Anuited b-afihs
upon dcir. although that questionable Ine luis
pni sought t. BE- lt sst-d Ia ti
n. question necessarily have bren VII tef the prcniis'
.Lascc uId-f duns the ynh iJT which the i-nt
caurd For these the cspiiou ssied wa not Wei
tk,n The to.L As OcIed Ia evidence receipt Jf Al"f
pntih o money paid nun BY de-
dant which main hands socuiy bf the
properly excluded by tnc Justice nfcy.laGt IL
had upon the question ht ,sge, and not bar ~
the plaintiff sh of action He obliged either by az
By the reeip apply tnc received by hiu
IA. rsn.dy provided as suOo. the asTs-cut v
Tho dan II d. nds had sr up IN his answer mat
for the acton Ia c,n--Do" ~ "a" de-
aud other mode placid THIS net De
l ID. Cuft 0 .ud.fO Oh" aaoHht cliiu.t, IL soul
b. come how lar she facts ~ouI
tender demanded without sIch frauf; II Is
clear ,iccd testimony Mt admirable and that
nothing n the appeal winch would stJ "a. la distafbng
the tndn VI The Court p1!ow. Judgment affirmed