Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1859-03-15

siBN AtEkk OIuCC Vi euG 9CtASAte
Kanawha County IN the month offMare 3.
Rutfner, Donnallyl& Co.,
ComplaihantsI
q vs. In Chancerys
James Hewitt. and others,
Defendants.
4 tThe object Of this suit u 10 recover against
the defendants. James Hewitt and Il. Y. ~:
Kerch evai, PARTNERS composing me hIm q
hewitt, Kerchevnt q Co., Of the city 81 ~.
Louis, the sum Of SIC, 6i6. sor erroneous ana
over charges made ~ sad hisn as me Solar
fn;ssion Merchants OF the plaintiffs, and TOT
H. fnrther burmese Of recovering from said
Hewitt, Kercheval & Co., a further sum, the
amount Of whirhis not known, for violation
of their contract and under "a king as Commits
sion Merchants aforesaid, in not selling the
salt Of the piaiptlifs as directed by them, and
m the further purpose of recovering nom the
said firm OF Humphrey. Tut 4 Terry, compos-
I'D of Humphrey, -- Tutt ------. X
Terry and M II. Broadwelh alsoOf 81. LOUIS
Inc sum Of $1,000, for THEFT liability ia not acl
counting for some $4,000 Ibis. Of sait placed
ii their, hands by said Hewitt, kerchevals.G
said RnfFner. .Donually& Co, and for which
the said Humphrey, TutE and Terry have not
accounted for as required By law, and for the
satisfaction Of the amounts as aforesaid TO at
tach the real estate Of said James Hewitt IN
said County Or Kama wha. and now under the
control and mana cement Of Chas. Hedrlck.
one Of the home defendants, and any MONIES,
effects or debts due now in the hands OF said
Hedrick or which may come into his hands,
also 10 attach in the hands OF kuilner, Hale
& Co., and the several partners thereof, any
sum not exceeding $1,000, due from them to
said Humphrey. Tut and Terry, for the satis7
faction Of the claim aforesaid, and for the fur.
Their object OF attaching in the hands Of Mich
olas Fitshugh, Executcr Of Luke Wilcox, de-
ceased, any sum due by him or Executor fore-
said. TO said James Hewitt, and also to attach
for the purposes foresaid, any sum due BY W.
q. Brooks to The said Hewitt, Kercheval s Co.
Ii appearing by affidavit filed, that the de-
PENDANTS James Hewitt, R. M. Nv. Kereheval,
John J. Roe, Humphrey, --- Tut,
- Terry and NJ. NJ. Broadway, are nom
residents Of this State, il is ordered that they
do appear here within one month after due
publication ofthis order, and do what is nee.
essary to protecttheir interests IN the premises
Teste, A. w. QUARRIER, Clerk.
SAITH, SuMsERs & MlLLEa, for Compp Is,
March 9, 1859, vim !6
ytYIRGINIA, IS sat rules held in The
INK Clerks Office Of the Circuit Court fol
Kanawha County, in the month of March
fRRQ.--se esassh MI III Eli -
James S. Council, CompPt.
VS.. il r., ~ ~ = u
VIM. N. Copin, and Others, = SiaHo osi
Defendants.
The object Of this suit is to subject 10 sale
the lands Of Vim. NJ. Copin In Kanawha
County, to satisfy to complainanta judgment
rendered in Kanawha Circuit Court in favor
DR. James Al. Lewis assignee of VIM. Gray,
against VIM NJ. 'Copin, and complainant fol
500 interest and costs, and which complain
ant paid as security for said VIM. NJ. Copin.
And also another judgment in said court fol
$50 95 cts. and costs in favor OF Samuel Moles
against VIM. ". Copin, assigned to complain
ant. And a further object Of said suit is to
compel Alexander ~. Bruen to close Trust
Of Record In KsnaHha County Clerks Office
On said lands, given TO him BY said Copin and
one Slack.
Come the complainant by counsel and on
his notion, and 1t appearing BIZ affidavit filed,
that William Gray and Alexander NJ. Bfuen.
are non residents Of this State. it is therefore
ordered that they do appear here within one
month after due publication Or this order and
DO what is necessary to protect their interests
ID the premises. Teste,
A. W. QUARRiER, Clerk. +
r. H. CoNSELL. Sol. 4:l6