The eastern clarion. [volume] (Paulding, Miss.) 1837-1863, 1859-05-25
DECISIONS OF THE HIGH COURT


l4tgpoTffl fypr"aSIH f0r t.e tr".F" : lf"h-
e-
r-..,., ..- -. ,,-3..5.s
-.'ii'ii H'i l!f.'iof- 90 VIZ Ni." y
~ son EEa Gryat Northern kailro1t ,"inlAi?
4. A'l"i''- h'l''i.-' Aoi' .'F'''f' i'''H"'''''
Error 70 the Circuit Court "l Pike County.
tbs cause L. submitted rs Us On motion 20 u.s.
mis-, tho ground 1rnt tho fa uTiH below o.a1 al
ta- Judgment. and the prescott ,iefen#aut ~ ,.gur
aungintsa ,tiluin-' before 'r rr. d error
aa- srcd out-sut tlaf 40 wit oI error viii lie
again. tf.o iriaI,art in o--or so alu. Of The piI
hcogj un'.l after r.. gD-.
!. general rui- ~ exc, D'tnr can ever issue p
favor oi or pgrr rr.ou Np IA no; marty 10 the
Original judgment ur ynaic 80 Ay some proceeding
subscqurrt thereto Bacon Abr. &. IA Tuck,
Com. D. dol Nor r4v ono l- made "a party laintH
~ such sub-equit proceed III. Who L Ipta Tiyy 20
such judgment OF entitled 10 the chin. recovered ~
heir cNcrutr~ ~ s.l,pir..fJ.r,~ 81 INN who had
Judgment Nor can ann sr..n BE- mai. defendant
10 nc eKaruI,r D., ..-rl .u}...ar NJ Urocrrd.ug
,,hci not gor,., ~ -,l. a. 49,, 90, demand -
| Bsr Executor r q: .DI " / o.. M Gs
Al Common law il ~. i,ffp.r,, held ,hat if an
OHM. .-r.ir III =, i,o -, r3,tI ~ : fut..-
t,re sUd jjat lni,r. ,,1ii,, tbaf ITO aduini--rt-
| tar Il Ii, ~ ,,i ', ','t'''' Wy. - ~. . y,
tslr ON -, IA; i,,,,c,,, ,,rt hon, trI,
! ~, WI 5''"th. hhn"h tiic execution - NM
IA, ~ - " ' % ~ ~ r. tho com.
,an1 tay o.. g.,,,i :, H. - mi a.. admin -
,,ator a. g.r -5 ~ tii,@j I.I,, sc IA. 10 laye
Tnacr tl,s or &, ,,o ll a. f,,la.l fbot TIC al
! Iuin.-,r,to~ 40 ho,s t a, t re,i,or might rrr-
feet y.5I,fiou already l,,,, 10 no original Keen
tor or administrator for The rioht it + said. now
comes 10 him IIcruar on FxGr y :.2,-l Salk 81
! 4tt.y. IT1fr lfts
In this state fan DrJyify j. in the ~lrne manner
| rqhli,hed liz tLr al ~ iS1s iiiicl Iaa M Art
1aL-and ~, 49,, ~ ~ -, = ~ ,raf..r n,
| boui- non rroyilr3 G- '''''' - '''
| IL - r 49,. i'I' IL, a. a
Of the nTeyious y,Si1tnr r NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. i ,yrIc-4
IL TrnyIc e. I3 ~ ~ w n T ~ 80
| = n ..l..-.' - -'''th i" NV Ng'' T. 80 80 80,
der On, - W, t up.3 NON '
No,,ei,I ,,ji,., ." III ~ ~, Al
oCtIc ri;,i 'i".e, IN, ut.uIi ~
fneut r,,,,. IN sl -. ,aii,lls , ~ ig,li7
INA IL. ~, ; ~. W. oicc 'sg~t VIZ ~ 49,
~. - s., 49, , -" '-E'.t !" it'"Nt. II may ~ i,
Nor T. an cH, y, o''g "n,1"oI ug , dl
| I,I,ir ~ - So. 'H ''''' To '.,',,'. ~ w :"
'- ~ y,,u''! N"ll. athnuEh Ms IrlIe7' w
xnr r We, I'd T .','tu ~ 81, a. .i'' ''''
"a, AlSf Junelnen' ma been rendered n the court ne
| "a mi - !, ,ai,.f.t ~ 'i M i''l wv Isi
80 ai'u 5IS PHHhuh mas died-although the adliiih
| ~ - t ~, my nav scllt l'''- !" -
| ceedip, an l. i,,.ti,,,,,i - III ~ 49, I,, =
| himself: 1rnIess tLer,f,ra g ,,,oy ,,o ,it ~ ,,ri
| Of cfr1r ana ~ 49, t,.3 ~ y, 80 80 - -,
ing from this court may summon The partjcs IN In
tcfcet here. he womb Ls without remedy - " =
II i sei,l-ad Roc ain ,itia cr-,r "a =, ana, s,o y, r.
son can fripg Vii Of rror r. e,r inde,igrt
,,1,n vr.s,ct a 49,. - -. - a. - - -
g,a. loi INJURED Nv fbe Indictment ana Therefore I.
receive ayautare liz Tho rey,resl tb.reof see ,,an
authorities cited :, a arit ~ r,-ror ,i,as M HI
aclips, am, hut hin, ,,bo - . marty nr ,rir 60 ia
first Judgment. Gis hers eyecntors or administr,
Tor. -, IN q NCl',.t n .6nEt;recr - Wsttns IN ,
said the heir or priyy in estate who Is injured III III
J e Il, ~ 80, ~ f.r ~. -, = S1,,irlf I
Ntasegrlu-.tfs !, eII t,rh"ro n ,,r;t 81 error =, J
.msl o,,- IN, an ii,nin;ltrat 40 b",,is,,, ,si,b
~
hc court -aii .sTLis II a writ 81 error brought I
! correct the error of a indictment recovered Ey Pei
Grant as executor If the last Will Of Elizabeth Gran
dee, r-cii. On bond given to her y the defendant
error. The writ states tpat since lie Judgment III
sid Bella has died. and tina; plaintiff in error l. AZ
Innstrator de hons with the viii annexed Of II
:. -aid Elizabeth. And We are called ca to d.cid
whether from these allegations the plaintiff has
b. mas not entitled himself to this writ OF Ar
: OF opinion that he has title this VIZ
because there is IN Law pIivy between the exec
tnT aud the administrator de bon~ non. And lud
mont recovered against one by the executor cam
he executed ~ the succeeding administrator.
The law l. the same whore administrator
ruYeI- judgment and dies the succeeding aanlI
traitor cannot execute this Judgment, hut may hrl
new action
He adds BY an English act Of Parliament IL G
> ch. s. nos in force herc-provI-Ion J. made. Il
the second administrator may execute e lEdGmt
recovered uu verdict by the hrsi admin'~ atoI' q
y J. 70 h. wished that We had some statute lncud!
o the same and perhaps some further provisions
L. Now il iic second administrator cannot eNrcut
a. judgment recovered ~ "a former executor ct adm
IL l-tIatug b. l. Ncry clear that he bring
Il, verse t: fYr IL has herume Intellectual, il not al
fed, and ii satisfied. the debt recovered hy II
been administered and the writ 81 error m q
case Was therefore atstcd ON HCon. 1t j. Gle
therefore from this decision. IL our statutes est
y fishing pTIyy between the first and second admin
traitors and veSl!ng the title to chooses in action
M longing to the estate that were in the hands Of
- first administrator in the second. had existed in NJ
4 sachusetts. or even the statute Of Charles the "a
- England that the would have held that the
ma mlni=t!ator dc bouis non might have maintained Il
i. a party 20 the record he was a party interest
,, entitled as such executor to the proceeds Of !
4 Judgment.
~ II therefore the administrator de t0uis non m