Red Wing sentinel. [volume] (Red Wing, M.T. [i.e. Minn.]) 1855-1861, 1859-10-22
District Court.

BEEN D;saGsion during the past;veek. He,
is large amount Of business on the calen
Observation-Disclosures = 4 /, Z +, I
i The Grand Jury found = bill against An
Sullivan, for the murder, Of Osier-of whicl
we gave an account at the time. She vii
be tried the coming week. ar1 aI,u
I The fs(lowing are tho cases thus far dis
posed Off g..l,. ~, ,. 7.,i'
= John Lyons, David Pickett and Andrew
Bergman, scverally indicted and fioed befor,
City Justice of Red Wing, for violation o.
{ liquor ordinance, from" which decision they
appealed Were discharged on account O
'nsuftic'sncy Of complaint. NJ cClure To-
fcity; Colvill for defendants. ne ggAu4p.al< 3
In the cases If the people vs.. David Puck
cit, Assault and battery, and same 70
Phillip Hoffman, for assaulting oficers-ap,
pealed from Justice Court-ths defendants
were discharged for insuffic,enoy of com.
plants. ~ '.'7' "5 :: ~ ~ + :; '+. .t
! aa .,'q:ry4 CIVIL ACTIONS. 4....,,:... ,,,.
Van Vleet against Morse. Struck from
calender. Colvil1 for plaintiff: - ~ /. a >I.
! Tarbox vs.. Jewett. Set down for Tues.
day NEXT, Mcclure \ Colvill for plaintiff
Bristol for defendant. e Eoayg ua4 - 90
james w. Paxon, pla:ntihe; "a. Charles P.
Haines, defendant. Judgment in favor Of
plaintiff for $685.. Plaintiffs attorney,
j. Daniels; defendants attorney, William
Colvill, jr. .>4:'i1sT . @s''s=&,F
+. O, Olmsted vs.. H. C. Hoffman. Jury
couldn't agree. C. Mcclure with Wilder &
Williston, plaintiffs sttorpeys; Colvill y
Hamilton. defendants attorneys.
David Pickett VS.. Joseph RICE. Judg.
ment for Defendant. Colvill b Hamilton,
plaintiffs attorney; c.. Mcclure, defend
ants attorney. ~. s''.'' '..' ..'..."'..
". V. Bennett vs.. P. Meserole. judy
'nent for defendant. w. Bristol, plaintiff .
attorney: G. Mcclure. delendant's attorney.
Edward Page vs.. Ii. G. Hoffnan-Sher-
1T. &C. Struck from calender. Mcclure
for plaintiff; Bristol & Colvill for dclend-
ant. .r.. a..-.. ....." iu.-l. ..,.-. .-.... u.
Holland ys. Paxton. Set down for Tues
day next. Colvill for plaintiff; Daniels for
defendant. =.
Joseph Bullmore W. G. D. Leighton
Dismissed, with costs against plaintiff. COL
i'll, defendants attorney. ,s
W. T. Hall vs.. David Hancock. Discon-
tinucd. Gurnee & Reynolds, plaintiff g at-
torneys.
VIM. Dodge vs.. dmund Pattengale.-
No appearance BY plaintiff-judsmeat for
defendant. Colvill, defendants attorney. {
Enos r. Tucker vs. Joseph Il Chapman
AMI e. W. Gillette. Gurnee & Reynolds
plaintiffs attorneys; Mcclure y Parker,
defendants attorneys. Continued generally,
Christian c. Nave vs.. Edward Sts4ugs
aud James Strange. Judgment for plaintiff
S333,2S.' c. Mcclure, plaintiffs attorney ;
Gurnec & Reynolds, defendants attorneys.
George Bevers vs.. VIM. Boothroyd.-
Garnee & Reynolds, plaintiffs attorneys
McClure s. Parker, defendants attorneys.
Case settled.
| WIN. 3. Grow vs.. Goodhue county. Dis
continued. Garnee s. Reynolds for plain.
tiff; Willistoa for defendant.
Orion 2. Ward vs.. j. G. llawes, John
Leason and George SPicer. Gurnec & Rey-
nolds, with Wilder & Williston, plaintiff s
attorneys; Bristol & Phelps, defendants
attorneys. Judgment for plaintiff 1857 so
Peter Meserole VS.. Fl. C.. Hoffman Chas
Mcclure, plaintiffs attorney colvill with
Bristol, defendants attorneys. "',.a 9ra
John p. Harper vs.. Horace Srcanton.-
W..Colvill jr., plaintiffs attorney; Mcclure
& Parker, DEFENDANTS attorneys. Motion
for new trial, by defendant. III "a
Osborn VS.. North & CARL. Placed .,
foot Of calender. Ives for plaintiff; Smith
Smith + Crosby for dete .dan:. ,l'L,| y