Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1859-10-21

Nlr CUSl:AD %: Va ,1. the Tr."!iiiuH '';p'ict tH
riuc. ln..'.crs TIE rs; "s Aha: .; constitutional ~
dri.on or infringement Ir.- Tie question "hi'
should lie sr.' decided y i- HpL-r, AMI a" hoped " 49,
bat. would he o,i---r.! ~ ;!sst question
Mr. SMITH O! : e. spoEs IN supper; o ne t'Haii'N -
,,nrri hy r Co;ai:i-r lie pG";, The -I'nc au"'i'.
h.ougl, forward 10y VI. WELSH. a, ,h'"l": r'ai ~
c;iu Of the E.cir, Unauthorized on ti'ir T:! IL
argued wish MICH c'DGu"ncr 'n- eva" 'na' would F--G
from the introduction u ~: want OF ri.cTnny %! ""'"
wL.c, had already resulted from the. Tc.outiYn', aud
Which wouiI result tie infringement q tie right OF
t!i,s lIDu." II ar1GieScei 10 H. ~.
- Rev DR.. MORRISON -! ny. related = rnuh": G: -
staucr. in which pat ~ "a rt:H": services ni NE
Church In beer. omitted an aid il' - -. ''c action OF
the clergyman 0r.,iirc lad 3"'n protected "Sin' y
had brought these resolutions {: tie in""s - their ~
Re- Mr L,rTi!:IuiE a.s,i II ,Gcre 81. any ns!t, D..
asccrtain TO wha; extent these ttiares 'r" is rrSa
lar service. had gone IN His opinion tn! ii ~" m u" ~
extensive - had been supposed.
Rev Dr. MORRISON -! that other Instance Ia! co'a"
under h!s Owa observation AZ! he id ~ !nnt every
gentleman cou.G r1i'E instances called "i 80
m. ,-.hcr continued lis I-'.: in favor ." ~" re-
pireia,i made originally, ta' ~ pat o! "a" regular
vices should be o,tic .uI hat charge IN them III ali
be mai. lie related an incident q; two clersywea comm.
from the Sprih The SnGh. one ConSFc:t"rgi>; ana
The other r!cora,"u. Both !mnihct nsT'tc7! '"i
u,ntl IT. , -. the CUncFr- nationalist "re Vas nH
,hag 90 preyca Liza :Tr preaching and Eras!u= III. own
sentiments, md the consequence Wa. that his congregation
became IN t;"l Win lis hercca opinions. aal hc
pas no 81 III. ci. 9! New Orleans at lie head 81
What powerful vrcir s"'t. III tie cfs" o! 'hr Ep'p'
pa!iga however. Ee compelled TO coGUfl . the
PRAYER BooK and inform his c1ncrr f'!oT 'at he n
.,.- - ~ .., II rr,uir- to crnt,rl s.rri-r III.
Srrg.,ir crc 10 the prayer Box .arl J.; IT, clergy.
,n.n co. and n, sGas iG'o r''cI ohscnl!i?.
Ecy NJ McNCHnT. % k..'at.G. ;h1t iirrc y'a.s a1o
The D!nrc Of Kentucky unanimously approved Iii, et.nn
Oh She part TIE ou-e Of Bishops II the snj-ct should
be ., before them asnn. he bad II" d'Gi hcy wnu!
ln,-t on action % :h Hon: upon hs "sci hut J."
hclicvci '.S unanimously ~ iaToF"' 'h~ cHHss sex
forth In TAG resolutions q. ;he Bishops.
Jcj.c CnyTNGIiAM aid Tia, weiay" 10: Ills qgr,l.o
r-cpcTIv before w. We hav" n" announcement from The
lnne t.! lishlvs Thar their resolutions ~, law We OIL:
know ia. .uy action t- su'y'c s.N nee" taken 10y
,lici u; co.nl,i. ilci- Jnungi J. Clergyman act,
rro, tie .gpuu,tnn thai i i Jaw j., hUi l." tried aud ~.
question be settled lie "5rr. g" ' r,:cgIio, he;ansr,
uron Information: nc; recgarl tefo i5"p"-rd 80
:r IN, House O! i-Sas without ENiUS nay opportunity 10
.hc.a b. heard in tisc.r own defence.
Jna,, KTDrIELn ~ ". opposed tie r.,ol!.!nr Iii.
resolution e, tr House "f E-l"ps was not legislative a.
zion. !! Judicial requirement. 1t Was aere!y ~ *
,,r..so.. oil o,.uon :!r,ir pat in -arL
5 III. parry T"y had frequently gi.-G .Tpr.-.s. {"
quite important opinions wth'g; V"in: called n gH-.
;ioa; and The: had Ie rig 80 to ey?-eS their "Ii"
advice tie bishops lie appreciated The tiiat'."'.
II uniformity o. worship bu a. Zoe :if- !; T.' no:
i sirsr 10 bT!ug services 10 cas-; iron standard liz
wanted ours - Ewing church aai where there TIE
there Is nj rays o. ir'' chang Some III: Essrs
81 the Church hal grown into d.usc by acilic,cscc a.
.or iu.;a.c !rqGi.-l 10y EuLIic :6ai all III.
r!t!s:. shat! Sneei Continue S:ccias in Irnyr: Now
i, lie coui see Ills excitement sTa~ gp here because hi
requirement Is not coupled with. :: would lie an erc.::-
IL, nj Oh good uiec': but; inas!dc as LII. action by tic
BISHOPS not law nsc aI!ih cNlsii mere oPi''"G
he though, tie exci.r1n; tn; lad arisen aiGoG. Was
iui,- unnecessary.
Viz FYAXS replied - Judge CJNYXGl!aH. thu: as
nc: irwin. the Bishop We lTs c"-oGGlh'e body w.u
the Bissops and ;hty having separate body ssc5
ton legislative In !:s aAuF:, which CANNOT u Constitution.
ally :asen s,hou consent. merely ;- them 80 d
Request ;.cn 10 re.coH,iie tnsr action.
Kew Dr. CONE Of Maryland, had listened 20 til. debate
the Of obtaining instruction, bai when lie foiE ihai
usi,:s disagree e forced 20 the opinion s aEy ac-
uop that proposed 10 the resolution, passed. sy