, 1859-09-30

sum OF one hundred and sixty dollars and
thirty-one cents, principal and interest,
with interest until paid, and costs of suit.
Evans for plaintiff, Kendall for defendants.
Butler Ives VS.. John r. Jackson-Civil
action Judgment by default for want OF
an answer, for the sum of three hundred
and thirty-four dollars and siXty.eight cts,
principal and interest, with interest until
paid, and costs of suit Anderson for
plaintiff. Kendall for Defendant.
Charles Morrcll VS.. Mathew P. Burns
Civil action. Judgment by default for
want of an answer, for the sum Of three
hundred and seventy-two dollars and nine
ty-seven cents, principal and costs of col
lection, and interest until paid, and costs
of suit Anderson for plaintiff, and Ran
dali for defendant.
j. NJ. Preston VS.. F. A. Clark-Civil
action. This cause came on to be heard,
and it appearing to the Court that the de-
mand in plaintiffs complaint had been sat-
isGed, it is considered by the Court that
plaintiff have judgment for his costs. An
derson for plaintiff.
". PeaT- : 80: n G. Latson-Civil
action. The plaintiff, by his attorney,
moves the Court to strike out part Of the
answer, and after argument, defendant is
permitted to make the defence set up in a
portion Of his answer Which ruling of
the Court plaintiffs counsel excerpts, and
exception is allowed and defendant is di-
rectcd to amend his answer by stating
what improvements were made, and he is
further directed to strike out that part Of
his supplemental answer which AYERS title
in others, other than the lessor, and also,
to strike out that part of the answer which
AYERS the conclusion of law as to the term
ination of the lease. Whereupon, defend
ant filed his amended answer, and plaintiff
filed his reply. Whereupon, defendant fled
his motion and moved the Court to strike
out part of said reply, which was over
ruled by the Court-eXcepted to, and al
lowed, and the cause being at issne, came
jury who rendered verdict in favor of
defendant for one hundred dollars. There
upon plaintiff, by his attorney, filed his mo,
ton and causes for an arrest Of judgment,
and for u new trial herein, and this cause
continued Chcnoweth for plaintiff, Wal
lace for defendant!
S. Morehouse & Co. VS.. S. D. Williams
& Co.-Civil action. Judgment by de-
fault for want of an answer, for the sum Of
four hundred dollars principal and interest,
and interest until paid, and costs Of suit.
Chenoweth for plaintiff, and Garfield for
defendant
Frank Clark vs. Russell j. Smith-Civil
action, This cause came on to be heard,
and it appearing to the satisfaction of the
Court that the demand in plaintiff IS COM
plant had been satisfied, and the costs to
be paid by plaintiff, it is considered by the
Court that defendant have judgment for
his costs herein laid out and expended.
Clark for plaintiff.
William W. Miller VS.. John NJ. Swan, ct
al.-Foreclosure of mortgage. Judgment
by confession for the sum of two thousand
seven hundred and eighty.three dollars and
ffty-eight cents, principal and interest, and
costs of suit, and sale of property ordered
to satisfy said judgment Evans for pPtff,
Garfield L. Kendall for defendant.
Charles Wren VS.. John NJ. Swan, ct oil.
Foreclosure of mortgage. Judgment by
confession for the sum of fourteen hundred
and seventy dollars and ninety-Seven cents,
principal and interest, and costs of suit,
and sale of property ordered to satisfy said
Judgment. Evans for plaintiff.
VIM. w. Miller VS.. L. D. Durgin, ct al.
foreclosure of mortgage. Judgment by
confession for the sum of four hundred and
forty-four dollars, principal and interest,
and costs of suit, and sale Of property Or
dered to satisfy said judgment. Evans for
plaintiff.
Noah Linscott VS.. Luther j. Tower
Appeal from justice Miles, Lewis county
This cause came on to bo heard, and on
motion of the appellee by his attorney,
this cause was dismissed for want Of proper
notice. Garfield for appellee.
james c. Stark VS.. Luther ]. Tower
Appeal from Justice Miles, Lewis county.
This cause came on to be heard, and on
motion of the appellee by his attorney, the
cause was dismissed for want of proper no.
tice. Garfield for appellee.
Mary Ann Boyce VS.. Miles Fowler, ct al
Civil action on replcvin bond. The de-
PENDANTS file their demurers to the COM
plant After argument, is overruled by
the Court-excepted to and allowed-de-
PENDANTS directed to answer-answer fled
Plaintiff moved to strike out part of said
answer, which was overruled, excepted and
allowed. Thereupon, plaintiff, by his coun-
sci asked leave until twenty days before
the next term to file new reply, and after
argument of counsel is allowed by the
Court, and this cause continued Evans
e. Smith for plaintiff, Kendall for defend
ants.
John Gilmore and NJ. j. Gilmore VS.. NJ.
L. Simmons-Civi action. Tried by Jury.
Verdict in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of
six hundred and ninety dollars and iifty-six
cents. Whereupon, defendant by his coun-
'sel, files bis motion and causes for an ar
poet nf iu1rn,anf nnI 60, % ,,.,,. 1