The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1859-12-21

r'anun should be beard u opposition tina, motion II
he gained th extension Of time come consideration
shond b. AL. wed 10 the plaaitli
Mr., Otonof bad no dtsre IA read the papers they
we've objected b.; he did not wish 10 flourish here
The n,~spapes but vii be content with handing the
aiidayit- To- the curt
The Judge eaid II the counsel for defendant ia.
miiaI win The papers ,hvy need b. read and he
would lear their Argument 90 Their contents.
Mr Van Bur rn said he object@r affidavit being
submitted 10 the Court as irrelevant ~ the present motion
The Court said the papers could be submitted tho
counter molten, but bot IN the present case.
Mr.. Van Buren, 1,cn proceeded state 10 substance
what the referee was or,cted To DO and submitted that
tbe report o the referee OF available until
confirmed by The Court Counsel aued at considerable
length the right OF the paiutn ION motion for time
To make case TO AK u disturb the order Of this
already made the Of alnony 4, be allowed
the plaintiff until the determination vi this suit l. would
be- The grosscs' injustice u make any equity Set forth in
the plaintiffs affidavit condition for the extension o
time asked for by the defendant
When Mr. vau Buren, concluded the adjourned
Tuesday morning
DEc 2o.-Mr. O'Copor proceeded to move for an
increase Of aony and additional counsel fees on the
following sfidsvita--
City and County Of Nas FORK -Cahsrue n Sinclair for
% ns s s s e.: as ssSSs entitled he'd
SSSI q q NJ
she further saa hs having obtained her divorce
Of having the amoSy settled ana the rssu
n Il. 90 - s her ps - s. .s
msss I'd she a.. The
exceptions be orocesdSss Tor the tie
%es Of ssd sesB ion for
d:cfs to the Of bat persev.red VIII be
Re ssaSIrs tarhss ... ,ss n sss
last requiring the ds,snd.n; pay Tor her two hia
on forty secoSd sns
has there KEEP, house ever since her family cssssos
With possibly the exception OF one appearance her dxei
Ss. "sSas Is sS%s " Ss
aefea, or alter sncb DETERMINATION, uni. IS be the
{, spp.rt as he p. Old from i,si to Jul. 1853
January 1882 ad tn. sha. WAS then adequate would
hath often head sna believes truly from various
cer Ire ta and since the SAID order .emparary allow
md IN dsavoaed To her knowledge belief 'h4
hlmse OBJECT NE tn Of this depousns
claims y Ills se"n lbs roer says thn such de-
s, oisrs'n IN pure Or vrtans Mad against supposed
person never teore te or heard of by this deponen
Vas produced az tness upon the trial OF thus
his sssociaicn With this desoneat was from
IN house tor or hrr es . ,as sn s. hs
MAS to be OF the most impure character and the said
hrou any by counsel suggest toe slightest doub
re 5 s na s that
eree this case and WAS examined BY this deponeus
ssSas as and diDsaas
given loose and indefinite wing ques
uons we put % nm by his owl COUNSEL and the following
you years careful or Otherwise la re.
gard the arrangement and custody OF your papers OF
have been very neslectful Of ALL indeed reckless,
since ls49 ard 1850
or expenditures
A Not soce 1850.
e sh. ypu have received for services actor
A. Nes the injustice an the wrong tn trial
h asss ssa en-
perry OF this life excepting onv for the my
he said reckless IS % money!
bn yer, careful and saving hereof she believes
non BY The mere dee O. saving money iw against
luea,cn The two together With the desire Of
victor, TO ahcb hs ucre cling every
rta of this sbe had fun evidence
heh his income at usand dol
srs she says that sh heard the summing argument
Ole not contend that any Of had been
con'd be made realize year and on
that basis be asked the jury to aos this aepooeni three thou
sked o By her counsel he further Information and
allow anee m July ast Der WAS interrupted during
~ asgunea' oy request from the defendants counsel
a. fe did not h to name hut that Forrest
ooar, se%sSns
The said reference most psr
Ss os G dponsn IN
for s" s 1
nesse erned copies Oh papers and the report of
500. CATHARINE n siNcIaIE
Mr. OCopor the part Of the plaintiff said that the de-
fence 10 this Is maBfesty perverse-its whole pro
gress with consciousness that is without merit and
Without excuse lts aim is, By technical exceptions
rciard the footsteps Of justice during the life of tho
plaintiff The defendants guilt only found of record
by The verdict Of jury Judgment Of the Court
but is substantially confessed The witness who proved
II was hot q oss examined the truth her state
questioned trial or has il been since denied
Whilst living III matfimony with his wife, aud AS he
swears in full confidence OF her purity and affection he
was for years the haoua occupant in the day time, Of
rooms IN motor os house OF prostitution None but per
cons Of the ooses morals Of the grossest tastes will
oepy that such conduct amounts guilt of the
some character. The entire Innocence Of The plain
un Is hot only found OF record in the like solemn
manner. but it IS, to all fair and lust minds
made manifest by acts the part the defendant show
ing that he is conscious Of her innocence He perse.
verhey sought 10 try convict by judgment of
political BODY u P.nbsylvaua where neither parry
ever resided where witness for against her resided
and where no i'll conduct alleged TO have been
committed by her When tried in the place OF the
mona domce be produced four Of his servants as
wtDesss to mleach her. Their total want OF veracity
ano The improper means which bad pecn employed to
procure Nor testimony were so apparen. that the Jury
oscledlt.d them And so ions the defendant
and bis counsel that the jury rightly dscredad these
Witnesses that they maize not0a for q new trial on
that ground From the her innocence was thus
made manifest 1852 he ID allow her any means
Of support until compelled TO DO july 1859 BY OF.
iefsivey assaipg persons who offered he any courtesy
fronoulcaDg her unable to pay her boTi, and Of IN.
chase manners he sought, during this interval expcl
her IRON viftuous society ana TO deprive her OF
shelter Without laying before the court the least proof
Oh any improper act on her part he sought when
the p alrufi with vexahon and expense by rambling
commission TO California expecting 10 pick in distant
Cline worthless person s'bear witness in like
manner as his four employees did on the trial.
With evident intent TO defeat the justice Of the Court he
has during the progress Of the case Withdrawn as much
81 bic property possible from its Jurisdiction and has
furer cssayed 10 defeat justice entirely by pretended
gifts, and by dispositions Of the character condemned as
being mace with intent TO hinder, delay aud defraud
crtdrors' Being man Of vast wealth, living Ia the
pest style IN stately wel furnished mansion in the city
OF Philadelphia, u s his moral and social duty TO main
tam ana support the woman who spent her brightest
as bis wife and IN his service, that too such man
nei as may afford her every indictment pure and re-
Spectacle course OF e By refusing contribute thing
70 her support and prosecuting her with the reproach Of
poverty and with impuatoDs Of dsbono he has proved
himself TO be lost TO all of justice The
touching the almony is most dscredtabc. If no
thought her guilty and desired another opportunity
TO prove 1t, he could have had the Judgment of the