New-York daily tribune., 1859-02-09

The citizens of each S,ste, in "the sewers. Staes
does not demand such requirement "a this. "nn
rspect 10 real estate, tire ron resident csonot VIII
draw il from the State ever If be does net Ike tue
Law, but is compelled to let il remain within the hunts
Of the State where il Is taxed. -,
The sur erior lsx OF the United States which forbds
tie imposition of duties by Ssste upon properly iG
ported from a foreign country, does no: forbid the
State, after It has been imported ani ha, become
mIeo with other property 10 the S,s.e, and thsrcby
iequres the protection of the laws OF the state from
e1ersirg toe hight TO require that such property oy
wboms ever it may be ewned, should pay for the PRO-
lection siioll ed Il
], is admitted by the complainant that the real
estate Of nonresident is liable 10 pay in taxes for
the protec afforded il by the State; and the chief
urged why personal estate is not subject TO the
same rule is that the rule OF law is, that personal
tate follows the person OF the owner and that there
fore it may De taxed n the State where the owner s
domciled. Teere is no aleg ,tou 10 the ban that the
personal estate of the complainant invested By him 10
busr ess within this STATE has been taxed IN New
jersey tie State Of his domicl. But if It were 80
'sxed, it would rot follow that il could not b
taxed in the State where It a;sushy was, ana
where protection was sctually afforded it. II non
rescept OF real estate should be tsxed in the
State of his domici assessment OF what he was
worth which should include the value OF the real es-
tate which he owns in another STATE or ne snoau
b. assessed upon bis income, which ncuied the rent
of such real estate that woud be no good reason why
u e STATE which the real estate was ami wnlch &C
'uay surds the projections OF It's laws TO u ana oy
knop pi ne r,r W Scn ,esI es,a.a IN
a. H. a,ra5se ard crs, of such protection
actually aff rded
Bank stock is personal estate. According TO the
.p9 .t @ " 80" = "" SO r. ba.bfr aun.I
by resident or nonresident is usually taxed IN the
Sste where the bank is ocsted. IL is believed that
IaTs ;aAns uen ~ y. ~, ~ 9ns.;,n,;nni I ttsr
., opPou t. IT, 1y y,S sa,n, =. he enoyyb that
ra'V E y, non sid. yb.,bsr tbst n1onertv
y.,u.I | a,nnS be rnt nnon an ropaitv in
ue a," " P.I ,b ~. n,on Wv of sras;dspt
le.pecl 10 te1an,n' van .ne p,oP'iy y, ;;'
Ntl"u' requiring 'NS' II 'n0"A '"'' s f
eser;; e CA. :; o.o oe %, 49,;
h,,,as s al 5ars tbsrs has baen no
JUS =. 80 -, 81 80. , % oe..;o, of
Pc, VIZ VIZ 90 rT,rnses snSced in The Ccnsti
80 80 li., al ,hn n,oner.v ,,9 J,s;yrs,
.uuVn' .u'' uI' S,'.e 49, W. .rson y U,wsrj
n',n,p ah 'pp o;a''' ls - - iii N Vr'aa,,'
IL % "u go 20. VI ~. i Na','u .A.I, @ ~, - -
i"% II was h'lu 'ua. tuo P'isOn"i fivt'..I =,
resident in state *rere lie was not uoicled inisu'
De toAt IL SuSn !a,teI S's'o'
Inc law oi NeW1ofH Pfesoii9es 'ual tut taN % .u9
perscns es'a'e OF sueh non resoeht may oe co.esea
rom me properly o tno ms person. " assoc,aDon'
10 Whl.n 'h.y teselahy ,h oeumgi ~. Lao
shiy, oVhi .ne, as a. co,nnI.;,ant
Shch mas peen aisu'u py tno , Pa'""n'
no ,mc put VIC cotnP'.sl: eou,pau q. "a
H. Ahmu Dg. ror toc purpose VI ,agu,onl, tua'
james e.. Klog, and the other iniiYiduais OF tne
hrm OF wbieh the complainant IS member, c99la
justly complain OF thiS particular inoue p,esroee -,
tie cclecion of the tax against the complap iat ii
should De attempted to De followed, on the ground
that IS oo)ecnonaoe as oeinS opposeu 70 Tue iuno %
mental is~i yet they MAKE no compant oy tais oii.
lhey may be'eI peFe cry cSuso VI conPiane, '.Iy
are IGt paIes 10 tais D no qlys;ou n' hs usI s.e
ConP,eeinaht y o"y Iueb o. L q. Va p r. II 49,, W asuss"j
or 10 tne nenner III wien Lne lsk nas oGen
sSahst nIs PeIso M "i pioPoiy :" :u'' @ -, tha
lis ProNs'opsi ine question IS, eau no iesiss tuo u
payments portion OF = law msy be ivaid whie
another portion OF It IS Vald; an inVsa provision oI
law will not Affect another anu distinct provision
which is yalld
Wlthou, going into the question therefore, whether
james q. hIpg ara TOE otncr uenoers VI Tue nrI.
excepting tee compaipatV ~ou!a hIve any cause ol
plsiDt If the tax should Do cohected rom tneir
property we hold that the aIegalOns N tno OIL are
sucien to justify the Court in interfering IN favor
Of the complainant boy junction.
The bill must therefore be dismissed.
j. Bancroft Davis for plaintiff; Abraham X Law
renee, IT,, for defendants.
REVOLT At SEA.
James Aldricb, Geo, T. Abbot ana ID Grahatn were
put on trial for attempting TO create IeVot on ooafa
the American ship LrgaIa IN J9te isst.
Capt Swift testified that Alirch, VINO was hist
mate OF the vessel diso0eyed his orders ana oeat MN
TIL be was ipsensibe. subsequently, the captain Or
dercd the other defendants 10 put Adrlcn In IRONS,
to MSurtius, where the captain preferred complain
against the defendants, who we're sent bono by the
American Consul. The defense couten1ed that ther
was nothing shoTn that the Defendants atIempeeu
A.. soti1,, h1,, ~ r.os,d to The Thor there was
tHe uo'ehOnpN, ous i" iesoiu :" 'n' o'"Nii '' WV
NJ Iossloilty vi Oh agIe.nehl'
Mr.. Dwight objected 10 inc rehdtioh Oh sucn VeI.
DICT as illegal Inc defendants haVng been conJoiauy
incicted, al or none OF them must DC convicted o
acquitted. ,..
Ire Juoge saiu Iha' mouIl anouu' =, q uisa
men, the jury couid not agree In the case Vi one Vi
ths st aei9n ua.s; III. ;,.h;,v % o. and r,on
,h rnt tba1 ;ny}ss b;, tba, IT,
a .Id,ooJ 80 oc,n;t ihhn,, snd Graham bnt N
70 Ai,;cS tbers was Saerence of on}pop.