Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1859-10-11

frsc. y.v yc:t insisted rpon ~. aa.a9 OF ~
,.l. tia, 81! Eccles'aic, power Wa' gwen W t ch
(i.i Absorbing - his Ts.!hs HE hr't C'uHS'' mi
-. fni record, composed q ar1ies Anu t,is
tr.:hreA and II tia; vas 20 be oIT nc'cl he -i'u ~
y N. Bsho;i 81 IN this House viii ''e r.%' '.-
woull he NOR Ia Conformity III ths: eA"H!
D.. D. rOwer claimed OK :he House Of Eh0P. w."
go tom shat conferred exclusively theta in the 'f"
T,anent VIA: ris; had we lsyn'en 10 Dit here ~ 81 ..
- Invention Mhl: right have hny bCi Bishops 10 pa
,r in the legislation Of the Church: EGi, nay ne
81, b- Bishops have voluntarily parted with thai @Hs
II vas Inherent power, fe,'sI 70 I'm ~ .f iI
IN. On .,.rn. = w.tr" the Ecclesiastical p'."i
r,s to =" i" %F ID, Ss sIS 1 ,@a re- re-
C,.I bad, -; forward, win Gnt rnmrtI stride, under
il. r., Constitution. AMI he would not alter IT,
judge roayus an OF Pa tIh'T'ser W. NV ,
chang There WI. much disposition 20 d'',,sH'H e
e,prri.ncr ard wisdom q the p.,' among we ~
tbr roun,r al the same !i-I o.iio" existed 700 "-' -
h rlTr TI. church IN The GH:ct SiIe' ~ 'hc Sou''t
u g ia; n.fy year. ha- grown 'r"ia 8 ~"
arer ngu,cr o: Giocrse-. "en''e'"sn - - IN,
church from other denominations ana ,",! -
FOR :.!.n,- not only To- it. doctrines, hu :, '"
ton which has existed AID under WIG" !. "a -,
forth" h.haH century Where sia'! "roun y' 49,. I'm
n. the required change: shall We - back "e! O,'
u it. formation or .lIl lock 10 s"rci!! 'ia' AS
Ken p!acr since that time to require The c.! ,'1' ~
heard no stated a. having resulted rom ' provision %
ne Constitution Then, arcwr u !e:i'''c 'i - IiI
O: iti su.e W. adoptr! ~ ear: h's N",i, -
not hav" been adopted. remedy iUhs.m''! er. -,
have not been 'r!t: lie would not e pea: W. .
other Gentlemen, but Sc Would s"iiy! 49,
the plausible doctrine Of equally vhi,a va ir"
scented hy tie Of tie aIn-GiIG-ni r".>'' ,"F
Of .rius that amendment. Does thu Amendment "'H"''.
equality: II 10 give to the ll0u-c 81 hth'F, H'
:h. direct power Of veto, but power of vt;o ny REMAINING
-i-nr give power which does ,Nj-' ia i- House
Wip formed the Con: rriion which frame" the Constitution
l. was composed of del, :dt". from the several drc"H'
And tin. House j. formed ircl a.cal!y 10 -r't'
r. from thu psopIr Every house j. certain extent
composed -. new men. Ito. !, il Will IL. lpu- Of H-
ui,s They arr 4 permanent House Tie "J'I"D- gwen
by l.lI General Convention remain nEi com" ~
IN the ZANE form ~ :hc ien-ral Convention. Th'
And when sou fnd pcrmautu. power existing auywl-rr
among men and ~. Rev Father. ar" hutlnrn yoH tot
y power always ,rr.ia; It, increase aud power tia;
vii never Weld.
When then We l0os .; The Houses liGer-Ht to
their composition oar fathers, >'vcG'y'h"r year
,rr before tho. Who ia fh- lI"r could take any
action ia church in other matters IN Their desire t.
conform 20 the circumstance existing 10 ;le listed state
carried forward and placed thi' matter In shape
which they believed best !or The church, Why should ~
chang. now The B-h-y, have romprte veto power
We cannot p-s- into aw au" proposition without "a
consent or failure 10 n0Hc0n"rr ar! wat more can tn!
a,.: "" hlv" 0 pr" ..!c'i ihai try a! not lI"'Gi'
r'r.! ,! and rr!G-" {" rf'r OF disagree VII"
J. that ~rOrgs
Can Tor said 'ht' Ne are pG"-snS upon
our r. Rev. Fathers when aA theta :" >ay upon ans
measure which have passed nat they tlnk II right OF
prsuc .nd II wro"c fog What reason: lie 81! not believe
that any provision could place them upon NOR rr"c'
.Ir.Il;y than she present Constitution.
Th- discussion continued NJ the hour ~ adjourn
ru.r without coming The conclusion : ;!s Te
l,o-t ai.! a;i..ar ia :o.mprr"", paper.