The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1859-06-28

", course
Yund on March Is that the French Emperor was Do
notifications Of Inc treaties of 1916 that he had great
sympathy with the Italians and wished TO do someIh ng
On the 1lth OF April the Earl Of Mamesbury In letter
to Lord A. LOTUS urged upon the government OF Austria
the popie,y OF disarmDg, and distinctly stated that II
herself in the wrong and forfeited the sympathy OF this
country" No further concession, he adds, was 10 be
Her MsestyB government fully approved the proposal
for disarmament Of the three Powers before tho meeting
Of the Congress- expressed wish TO bring 70 close
the "fase negotiations that had been going on.
We may conclude summary with tbs folio wing last
warning" Of the British government TO Austria after the
arbitrary summons which she addressed to Sardinia Of the
| latter end OF April
THE EARL OF MAIMEsBuRy TO LORD A. LOTUS.
| FoREIGN OFrICI, April %, 1859.
My LORD have acquainted you by the telegraph with
the strong feeling OF indignation against Austria which
prevails IN LONDON IN consequence OF !s having Deoome
Sardinia to dsarm under penalty Of immediate ho,ttes
10 Gaze Of REFUSAL Sardinia had actually agreed uncondi
ucray TO disaIn Your ordshp's language. therefore,
to Count Buo cannot be too strong in regard the course
| adopted by Austria.
Her Msesty's government are at loes to imagine on
what grounds the Cabinets Vienna justify this menace
Of invasion OF Sardinia now that she has agreed dsarm
tcarpo surely be justified the ground Of the admission
The Austrian government was Itself consenng party TO
the admission OF them in certain character and Il s
monet'ous to suppose that change In that character,
Whatever II might be, even supposing 1t were insisted
upon could warrant Au.ia in taking the fatal step Of
Her Msestys feel after all that has passed.
that they are entitled 70 expect to be informed on this
issue you M ask Coun. Buol ohether Austria ,0u stop
ne march Of hr armies and 'ou agree 10 The admission
and not as ppstessiares, and ,o a.so accept s s ra
three points IN my proposals Of the 18Th inst RELAXING TO dts
armament 10 be Effected y commissioners and to the meeting
Of the Congress lUhe3 these commissioners haze commenced
! their labors
You Wia give Coant B,pl clearly to understand that the
refusal Of Austria ,oiu enlist against her the feelings of the
| government ana OF oil classes in this country.
You will add that, in making this proposal her Ma
| would at once be arrested.
As regards however the question OF Sandman disarma
ment bave to observe that her Majestys
still consider impossible TO call upon the Cabinet OF To-
once to dsperse the Free corps as such measure
would in all probability lead to a Revolutionary move.
ment in Italy The wsest would be to keep them
together for while under the Alps, and to eis their
The following strong language moreover occurs at tho
close Of drsugh OF note protest. presented by Lord
Her Msjeety government can only now deal with the
case is presented before them-namely that Austria
has peremporly summoned Sardinia TO disarm under Pc
palty OF immediate war; and the undersigned (Lord A.
ftus) Ia dire TO say that her Maestys government
mainly which they have earnestly strven to uphold and
also to those who bave aided them In their endeavors
somny to record their protss! against the course that Aus
tia, regardless Of the terrible consequences 10 Europe and
indifferent to the public opinion Of the aoold, has rashly
and, as her Majsys government believe, 50 ujusly adopted
for the i,eyies and catarites Inevitably consequent on
conflict mhch ,oas on the Of bsing aped but uhich
byun, ui itallbly produce than ordinary amount
Of social suffering and political conp,tlsion.
On the 25th Of April government considered the
eotiaons for Congress Sat an end and war unhappiy
THE ,RUMoRED RUSSIAN AND FRENCH ALLIANCE
Tho "hos.le" character towards Austra) OF Russian
neutrality commented upon early the 18th Febru
ary, by Sir j. Cramp,on the English Minister at ST. Peters
burg In April instructions given by the Earl Of
burg to make inquiries to the alleged secret treaty be-
tween France and Russia. The French reply is found
the following Dispatches
Ny DEAR CowIEY-They write TO me from St. Peters
Russia and France Since desire that not the lsheri
cloud should obscure relations, wish to explain my
seli very frankly with YOU without delay on this sub
ject You know as well as do that diplomatic usages do
not admit Of questions touching secret treaties from the
very simple reason that to consent to answer in the mega
tive would be to establish implicitly that refusal to
another occasion would be equivalent TO acit
avowal Besides, II conversation had not been OF q
thought OF asking me luch question; and if you had
a.ked II, my duty would have obliged 70 remind you
above mentioned had not thought it necessary to
coed in such manner with you taking the amicable and
how have not spoken to you OF treaty but greatly Wish
Ing that you should not deceive yourself as % the nature
OF the relations which have been established between Rus
sia and ourselves, attempted In conversation to
ty some erroneous ideas in this respect Thus them in
order that there should be misunderstanding between
not have been within my competence to accept question
confidential conversation which had together l said
nothing which could imply the idea Of treaty n
FAIL cowIEY TO EARL OF MAIMEsBuRY
PARIS April Is, 1859.
erday, in which enclosed to your ordsbip copies Of
letters which had passed between Count Walewsk and
eTaen Tn spa 70 to
ten communication from his Excelency. In the even.
saw rh bis os, and he reverted the
been TO estabisb that he had never told ma that
there was treaty in existence. admitted that fact
and explained Row had happened that an erroneous n
pressicn CO that point had gone abroad He went
on 10 say that be could tha in all
nicaoi projects which had been exchanged bet
the French end the Russian governments nothing had
psssed which treated directly indirectly British
eress They bad eferen solely the Italian question:
and the overturee ma by the French government,
through the Dnke OF akof to come TO q common I'm
Outstanding with her Majcs's government to the OBJ
ects CT the If there TO be. answered
his Excellercy hoped yhng had passed bet ween
the French and Russian cabinets should be freely
Waewski whether might give her M.jestys government
tie ASSURANCE that there no understanding between
ton, sad, becaure he language Of Russian agents gents
abroad gave her Majes'y's government right to
ea,es Of 1915. IL sbe could secure tSeyen1 the the
abIogetion Of the treaty of 1855. Count Walewsk
REPLIED in a tone which carried conviction to my
miro, that he would give me his word that there
not liable Of truth in the report. ALI alluson to East
ern sfars had been sudiously avoided by France Bis
ExceleDcy added that the existence Of treaty, offensive
spu defensive with Russia, having appeared in the
papers he entirely ooDiradcted It. At first it had been
decided that the contradiction should appear in the Mn
tur, but had been thought afterwards that such pro
ceedrg would give too much importance to the rumor
| and the denial would be inserted In other papnrs.n
| PARIS, May 2, 1852
| n. IAMBAfs ADEuR-I have received the letter which
you did the honor Of writing to inform me OF the
satisfaction with which her Britannia Naesty's govern.
ueDt had received the spontaneous which Il
bad pessed the Emperor 10 give you verbally the SUBJ
iecs OF the relations which have been lately established
between Russia and France Hs Majesty has deigned to
authorize 10 repeat to Excelency that nothing
the existing arrangements between the government OF
the Emperor and that of Russia in the communica
ops exchanged the subject with reference to the a
fa's Of Italy, OF nature to affect in the slightest de-
gree the interests OF Great Britain that tho new re-
port Of treaty OF alliance offensive defensive ex
istipg between Russia and France, entirely without
| foupdaton
FIREWORKS,