New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-07-21
Court oF COMMON FGEAs-ijsstSAL I'AS.-,.y
Ptlnp U.ay ssL Nv f-rs ard Hsf~ul Rsh-'eH N''l' -

.pf,si ss. .hg panaf AID Ps.turas' f'r ne me
opsu b.; ~ionsi-s o. NJ b'-'. y r., a., sorss
his p,-.sr- b, ~ ~ -noipiAe @. -,
ara r~ PARTITION ;,nc, between ih- - aud NJ ~ r.
.,uai..-u All .fcs.s .trsysf tn'vH-1 = 'i' ia
n. # -. defendants iud ~ M. sii| d. ,..,
/, csiud by desudAn'. ma T. ~as nes.s-et 20
hr h. ihr -, Ie'sr-c H. ;b- bling a. arie i've u
AT c,-ni.sal q tA- o1nplain; vas "te' ' ~
80. o-fs.,, aim fo I'D - - jerc- d-sa f'-n bi's-
Gri nd wif-, 70 them 81 liz ';Iip S - ID % -
Couuty Jug 2 1875 e1uAuiu- -rs-' 1n ne
or., me --st-y aua westerly n"s 81 AN sliP
ed. Awfal AID saitt 'races - 1c'e ~ ''a, 'l . q
ed RPS r ~ ;rEm G. IS Jars, "r l Ar expiration o. -le
Tle - sase adsneu, i rAnss M The vsae OF The
sol. aui the 5--boan. srp-1L
In comm az. Tie Nps ioi. 4ai Efe RAilosi Company
Krrsn ~ vs.. determined TIA. lie general l4.y ssrs
Aiuauius f-c". ne si". Of n,'d' = no- ne-d
by General Rsiifosd set u sy See LsS l
-. upon =, Railroad Conp.nss aud un oous i.nce on t'i
Ja hey aid ,asu ssru @fe aoe of al dA''-s Nt..A '
ms. ,aer, Tbst du,y imposed OILY r ne ben.
Ell .-cuIiiy Of he p4oc, bu. sso f lie ora 81 ne
owIr. OF oae generally aud suu such feGes AZ erected
excludes Grus" ~ negligence On t par vi a.
such against ia Psat0n % sr'o'ef damages i's Ne
riury resulting from 81 siligs .. ....,......,,,.
.ay feare a,oa he pck provided sPer-r. me
ION ha,- o. u zoe fences required By The
AhoGsn a-r ;he nee' have been ei'otea arrs "a
recovery N such ease 4" Len ne n'eis ne, ~
fine owner othe cette oJirsd cntf'a" 70 ne 81 ~
th-r H. coiHYrna~ ao,Inr 10 sei u a.i'H' Oh
ihs Tor - ernce th-o PREVAILING ,-,.....
Imey be uctcej that IN he cited the nf cA
the rack deGaas Snd - appeal EAi Greg uN
b4ssiard in he present had consyrd the mp aud W
en- u s -. ~ - al W.. Bound D. ,nis cove
ut But he Court (i4Nin, held tat as ~ tih tue
s herS.t ths, if Grss5ry. ca;le entered Upon
rad m m hi, land sy OF being fence, and been
injured, his coy.nsn, would have teen god A'seI 20 s
ti" other words he would BE- e.oppcd rom rrev,ns
any dams., resulting non p2rmre ~ MN 81 ne eA
pr.. covenant although th. dy bad been imposed oy %
saU.- mp the CorIorr"n yet ie uDdei Dos ID F 'i - ~
LIE p,ii, finance Of the co'"uan entered mo y I' WON
have aii.ed he statute. De would uot De- permitted - recover
for inJny resulting to himself aid aS E'l' ms nH
IT,. in n. present case hsd the horse in question belonged
10 Bs.5rd Il l. quite wood no, o. -ntti - recover
in cop Ike Ms aud ;Hs only iae: ~ - 9s o.,
position Ait, iespc; - al iufy OF 'ns h''''' IMAM n ana
i ha. lon. been settled Law .ha. coyeuan, 70 maintain ea
zion fences b-s,eu lands grsn.ei ld ohrF AM Oh i1
with the Land ana buds and Affects al p5.3hs at
occuPyns The lands under the pay u'Alis 90" ,
hiaId AbIdsmsn sec - %; Pa N Tn 0'e1l 20"
Lib.,l i8 B,0doe ss ellsworth Il Mr1u'' heN.
Com, q? ana not. sPelcer' csse p, ~, oAs Ss'
In the language OF ChefJu,rice Nnt IN baly ag- Nes
supra. reYurtei 10 his Opinions 81; Covenants ~mch
con mon law though named They ,'s - To-, 10 m thing
they tha, they follow every particle u ~. Aud
Therefore ahoush party msJ have mere Occupation
lend T palitl purpose and "hcn may De- SAM - %
'Fee:es oftte, noush OF 'e 90 oidt y DIG I'm ~
Iauc lo.d AID although be may ~; BE- eod % perform ne
covenant assignee, yet would op"cse a. Al -opp-
IN al IL wbicn the isndcrd would Dc estopped
IN Spencer. case SUPRA dis.uc. takeI between
wa upon the devised premises AID N "hich
The lessor not named aud covenant % main
tam "ali Are ~ erected and was ned INA IHe III
that (Which Of tEe class n named was rot bld be
cause ID, tAir H. pct which The made
in issue, snd had uot at The time d wsGg ne covenant
been pant II the land. Ii only contemplated aih)1S
agfeed by Judges that orcias sss thi1 "litl
directly sAecI th devised premises II ~ "ld l'sen
h been ue5 The covenant would pave 0uhd me as'sl 0t
could be- nded 90 Kim without hs being aaned II IT, a.
the subject L did uo relate 20 ni1g 10 sN''sue az
the time the devise ,Gr,y - Cathbtrson Gritty ~
u.c,,.ary to use tne word ne, other o.; nh rt
Conveyance in rider % grant or cary az ei;e "a @
f.f. q. Ftts III -
49, dee uued hat hos cover auis run WIZ l- 4tac'
which lie touching or coacernns and afvc =; Val'e
confined those winch respect some Pnysi4 &C. W
Il is urnec.ssa however pursue This subject, will
no. De- pretended that tie es,oppc Winch ans' m tls case
grows oct Of he plaintiffs liability - Pdm 'he covenant o.
tla, Tia occupation under Bsf ID and IN
subofdAon coyeiaa,s cona'd IN ad"rd Iiy re9,drd
quire 10 greater rights rsspet their passion han his
landlord had 20 c'bi' ana ge . esopp-d ia al + % | m
The extent as Baofd would nave oecn lAd e DoeA
Affected particle II H. ou. -gefy occupation sIb"ct 20
though the occupant was under 10 szatol 20 per-
Tae isner. should be reversed.
Peter D. AZ at the New YORK and Harlem Railroad Company
DAILY, r. J.-WlthOut inquirng Shether an aSr"o- |
psy p. moutn tor the privilege o pistuus MS
sre % Bas'ioi @ Others pAsiins men Aoi,es 'Lsre At s
the and To bno Duly to the Perofe.nc7 OF cove
paI's uunuR with it'd point uPou which give mo- opnon-I
tank putting his to pasture up1u lot sdJoinne
lie fence between wh aud tie rack was ~
c- condition. ac Of rssness m par, that
.ly col;nbu:td 20 he injury ana deprived MIN Of night
OF action against the defendants
Chailes j. NaccohAd ast pfnsN'' DAfs'h -nu NN-he'
DAILY, +. 1.-The statute declares that the Judge |
.abenbea BY, 81 witness. aud that SHAH BY
taking Tue amer meu- OF 1871 h"r provides
that, vii. sppca ion made IN an order IN me .th4a
o Il the witness couditona iii 'er, n'tsst OF directing
examination To be had before him may make an order reqr
IL ne adstrs- par, 70 show ca'e WY M eva i'ou
by ierse 20 b. appointed BY Tie oc-f Is nls
.s the order made Tor The examination o. Tue 'iine'' De-
fore Chan bc upon t'y named a. which me tae par
trs siptsfed sld 90" Ad'tis- p'fy lns''p nay s
dosn tie eXanasiion q ne witness hs' u OF e las '3,ol
app0nt BtcTe 20 taxi tne testimony l" nave eh do"h
ne testimony would have obliged ne ~ have mYr i3r
several cay matter I-a exclusion % ala me other
Chamber aDd Special Tenn bl,i1r large a'4-t - "hltn
Co4t ach G4y that must b. imm'1.J ana "a,
der Tor %, way iue ,ssnYny II the
wtLe.s ,.oud p. taken by Referee oDt al order
eAs TIE vness lid MT ee caei uP'l, wa,a tne
pits tr wiil-s before L- IJu p per oder -
,Ao" ga re "A) We .,J L. 80 = - -,
made ana ~ ,lst -he examination sn0 d DO
~ C.-'sI .ti ~ ~ - "a elr 5f.,.s as set
~ ae Judges u Tie Court " POi 10" u ~ years
that would We, ry answer al ,ucn questions shoud
ordered at lie clEet eNifnf O tn Wit
~. BY the p4luds attoney and the
Aauls.ou by the d~.-aaau., attorney. tlt .ne
parties pIe..ied i, would sppoilt tue D.P.ty Cl-rk
70 act a. ~ smsaasusi, ani wn.e Town ,he test.
uoLy, tie defendant attorney sug preference, bls
clls ls sc-l1n 20 tLr ~ thst mus "ite GYn TIE
, tmfIy my..r Else appoint take - dfa,'d
Il q. De- "Iu down % tnc man e. above - ID and declared
tLa sAy on renee centred ~ e l"'i VI ' x
either Tie pfoPue'y % tn- question:. pl, " IS o. t3e srs
81 -1t f-'sL VI sA'os met ie pr 'l'Nd !r-i % me-
end l the direct sld nation VA fy VIII
~. before j; "es lo';'o y Ail sA4 'siei o. I' ;. I'd"
cit .Ds T. lHe examination II Tie "l-l- A" - -IriIG-
down 0Jl gies.lon sid a'~r Ine examination ''i So
s:s days, aud ~ cp,.d wa- csl-iy rr4o over 10 t'
eye,- III e.rfse,.7 end .fy y,rsi va b.. Ter na.
H u lis o. ~ f.HI I'll. WaH II