, 1859-05-13

eNccplS 10 inc ruling oil the court, winch II
allowed and placed on file.
Haber vs. Hamilton--appeal. 1t is or
dered by the court that the plaintiff retain
the possession Of the property, and that
the defendant pay the costs Of this prose-
cation to be taxed. rr.s
Territory of Washington VS.. Julius Bar
barrie complaint and recognizance from
Justices Court for Indecency The grand
jury returned that the complaint is without
foundation and frivolous, aud the, court
being duly advised, orders that the COM
plaining witness, Z. l.. Dale, pay the cost
of this prosecution to be taxed, and that
execution issne therefor ---.--..---.
Territory Of Washington vs.. Miles Con-
way and Julius Wpsh-indictmen for an
assault and battery On motion Of b. P.
Anderson, Prosecuting Attorney, a nolls
Pros was entered, aud the court judged the
complaint without foundation and orderd
that |. II. Bush, the complaining witness,
pay the cost of this prosecution to be taxed,
Territory of Washington VS.. Michael
Martenan--grand larceny. Cause submit-
ted to tue jury. Found not guilty; wheres
upon the court orders him discharged.
Fredrick Fink vs.. Territory Of Washing
ton-terteOraTi. The arguments Of the
counsil being heard and being satisfied that
there was an error in the judgment of the
Justice, orders it reversed, and that the
cost be paid out Of the funds Of Clarke
county.
Territory Of Washington vs.. Gee. Rose
and Joseph osenstock--certeOrar This
cause being heard aud the court being sat
isfed that there is an error in the judg-
ment Of the Justice, orders it reversedA
Territory Of Washington VS.. John Ed
dings-breach Of peace This cause being
argued by the council, whereupon 1t Is or
dered that the defeHdnut be discharged and
that the complaining witness, 0. Baker,
pay the cost Of this cost to be taxed.
Territory Of Washingten vs. Zoraster-
robbery Cause submitted 10 the jury;
wberenpon they found him not guilty and
the conrt ordered him discharged. a0.ni b.
Territory of Washington vs. Thos. Fra,
zier-asSnult with inteut TO kill On mo-
tion Of b. p. Anderson, Prosecuting After
ney, it is ordered that q nolIe pros. be
entered and the defendant discharged, aud
that tue complaining witness, Walter Nc
Kinney, pay the costs Of this prosecution
to be taxed.
Territory OF Wushiugton VS.. Andrew
Kirby-robbery. After due consideration
this cause was submitted to the jury, who
finds the defendant guilty and fxes bis
punishment at two years -lmprisopment
(from the first day OF this present. term Of
court) IN the Penitentiary, 10 Be kept at
hard labor, and that be pay the cost Of this
prosecution to be taxed.3ii eiino9 ahi
Territory Of Washington VS. John Delar
cature = indictment for grand larceny.
Cause submitted to the jury, who find de-
iendaht guilty aud the property stolen 70
be valued at twenty dollars, and flx The
punishment ut two months 10 the county
jail, whereupOn the court 50 orders. sya1
Territory Of Washington, vs.. Herman
Hass and Joseph Wise-for violation Of
license law - retailing liquor. Found
guihy-ahDed fifty dollars each and cost oI
prosecution, ndthat they stand eommitted
uptil paid. Filed bond for stay Of execq-
ton in open court.
Territory Of Washington vs.. Joseph
Wise-vioation Of license law--retailing
liquor. Found guilty--hned twenty-five
dollars aud cost Of this prosecution, and
that he stand committed until paid Filed
bond for stay Of execution in open court.
Territory Of Washington vs.. L. O.
Kiney-violation Of license law-retailing
liquor. Found guiltya-6ned one hundred
dollars aud cost Of suit. The parties come
forward in open court and claims stay Of
execution for sixty days from and after the
last day Of the present term Of conrl.
Bond fled and approved. pl- giif
Territory Of Washington vs. u. Freden-
rich--violatiouo the license law--retailiug
liquor. Found guilty; whereupon i istbe
Judgment Of the court that ho pay a fue Of
ffty dollars and cost of this prosecution.
and that no stands committed antil paid.
Territory Of Washington vs. Moses Levi
uexter-violation Of license law--retalling
liquor. The parties come forward and
plead guilty aud threw themselves upon tho
mercy Of the court; wbere0poh Il Is The
Judgment Of the court that they pay each
a line OF twelve and one-half dollars each,
and that they pay the cost of this prosecn-
ton TO be taxed, and stand committed I'M
I'll the same is paid.
The following persons were admitted 81
citizens Of the United States: fsr i
rI Patrick Fitzpatrick. John Temple, Wm,
Breton, Daniel ?. Healy-late subjects d
Great Britain; Geo. Shomberg, subject d
Fredrick William; Johan Mehlg, subject
of King Of Prussia; Geo. Schiued, subject
Of the ruler Of Baelen, Germany; John
Hexter, subject Of Duchy Of Hesse Dam
9 stast.
: Court adjourned. ~
JAMES B. LA DU, ai
II Clerk