The Mountaineer. [volume] (Great Salt Lake City [Utah]) 1859-1861, 1859-09-10

ItorYr onI4E|II| ur4N ~ Nu-4 81 ~ tAiounrl.
,opat doun Sfnsnli Stl,llpt % Ne enae ~
tsrs lhs stor|, tpeh1 r3.Inel rymbathy inndsn.
sins a. j.S,. "a -, th.t Is reason q . mnci
esins lsi1a q .Sislthts d thIs Taritesy, 80
thas NJ psor'1 hHd h,tn sieped ~ ! iims Pr.
sisuril. = fcnnii rls.l s.I1.s md % unpunIsh'
=. Thnertri ~ = rindIc~.e and y opvsrne'
~ a NV.
~ rsNSlf ih,s ~ ps,,p \ q, intlrtnsnl
anx tort&1nitd lhe1t6n, tnt r,fersd g ths -
riaionco ~ prisoner had given q ecrnislfsillne
shscks y tlfisud covst6mshi, and ssmindsd ihs
iurt hat ~ prisoasr ~ " Hfst y inirednss
~ schsms. and hrsi b nps ne tsrms y r,slsn.
i6o s,efsis.p Ther wsrs q rsnsnlss 'na,
MtKsn1D he'd dssllnsd ec'ns inio ~ scheme
htcsnis u ecounssly given him ~ some one n'
rkoS. nsnS "a not irsnspifsd, The Conn-
- - k&rs r6isisr1n..z-sss nfsWer's evidence.
--1spmtsr.
Csunsa hen frfsnsi q MrKenzls striking ~
kIsnE.. u,atins pIaiss, ke.. which, done knowine-
b e. eedniah ltlnE purposes, nsds him guilty
q ~ ccims.
NJ. DeWoll then read sons extracts d .. s.
I.ws On which TIE indielmsnt had been esernded,
rsnatklng that iussmnch y Brewer had turned
..stnie., evidences, ike prisoner being concerned
ID ne crime would have 10 tass IN fesponsIbili-
s.s, thIs elosst slGumsnil of ihs prosecution
Ths prluonsf desired 10 fnish he Plea % MI.
Thompson. who retired % account Of sickness
Ne conri ruled i, Nss now TOO late, q govern
msnt hst closei De csss
The Iuaes thsn addressed The jury Il tolowss
eOaNstrwrF ~ THE Junrs-
xoa efathe judges Of what ths tssiImony o.
fsred yyn sondncesto prove, and by The evidence
sluns yepms 70 fnd verdict II this cause, end II
many srimss hays bssn eemmipsd n this COM
muriiy. Ms no reason Why ths prisoner shall bs
eopvlci,d or aequiiisd. AZ cool dIspsssionsis
c,lzeps, Il - your duly 10 consider The evidence
slons aadsr ne oaihs yon have taken. DssIdl
Mehsnrp done \ Oh islal before ycu, and IL l. =
70 him alone Jon should find.
IfyoH pie satisasA from ihe evidences that he
issnily - charged, he form 81 your verdict
WiIIhassws lhsjnfy hnd the defendant guilty q
ehsEesd u ths irdletment" II you do not 30
bslIsvs from The evidshes the form u your YER.
dIsishsnIt bs Eve ne Jury Ind tie dsfsndani
notGAIlly." and 10 either event ths ysrdic, mast
bssipnsd " year lSlsensn
n yen bails1e from the evidences, that ths pFi.
sonW1pNid MsKsnsIs, Myron Brewer aud John
X. WalIaes entered into conspiracy 10 dsfraud
The limited States. 81 forging the ch.ek o. Col.
q. H. Crosman, Deputy oaarlsrmssisr General
on lhe Assistant Treasurer a. The United States
q s.. Leais. and h fnftkeSancs 81 he common
design, MeKenzis engraved ths plate. and struch
o. .he check IN eonsrsrslsy, and hat Brewer and
Wsllaee took Il to Cedar county, filed II ii
ihsre,Ilhns seppletipk ne forgery, and passed !
81 thyst ~ Willl1m Lentsas rsnuIhs, then yo,
should And me dsfsndan, guilty - charged ID hi
iudlalmeat, n yoa DO not % hslisys, then yol
should aad him cfkuilly.
The Judge thep adaea he foIIoWipk inslruc
lions p ths irAveiss iaFys o. Ne art q he pig
aecntlohs=-
Mths jury bplIsssssom ahs esidsncs Inst ,hsl
Was a. aertsmont o. conspiracy anlsred Int
between The prisoner. and any other psIscn
psssdpp 70 ketes checks 10 imitation o. ,hsl
dr4un on ihs AssIliahs Treasurer 81 the Units
s,sis1ai 81 Louis, ~ o. y Csosman. Dspul
ouaf,srmastsr General, and they did % forge Il
eb.ah n .vlsnes. Il ~. ras.. he iarv Mi Al
II. s., .on.t rnil,v under Do Indictment charein
him win forgery ID Is. coanly 81 Cedar, II ihs
behaved ths forged dfafl was pat il circulate
thss. ~ nv en- 81 Ne eonspiraloss. each peno
npr1ost Al ~ eenspiraev. who did any cot !
s.I,ksranos II ths dssen 10 dsilaud, being ehsre,
abls Nth he acis Of cash and every 90. eonspiI.
I or.
Il ire iury b.l;.sa from he .,id,pe.. H.. i,
d.isndani made Il. plat. from which Il. fore.
ehssk was s.rrek. and asssisd IL striking d
blaaks wi,h !, though hsmsy not hare aidsdt
fllng ~ sd cheek, y putting this d clreula
iish. be : nsvsrthslssss Gailis updsr .he statate
On he part q NE defence, We ask the eour
% Instruct lhe iufy that the act Of engraving i
noterImIaal q llself. unlsss the Intention 10 de-
/ fsaai upon he part Of defendant i evident
INsrnucrfoNs ar THE rorpr
- -, x : : - - 49,