Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1859-10-11

--------
which may have adopted the same amd all .Ee. a"' sh
be fret PROPOSED in G,I'ta! I"n' .h'''!' .' "
known To- III. s.y-ri. pinc.-"n CrI'c,:ii"h',
u All r aua,y agree! a. ~ rncI IN the ensuing "thcrd'
Couv, :tipi. -, .,,, -, iii. coor
Ii, presume! there scarcely senie. o., W., 100.
xho could give Information Of what au peel "o.e III
y.rrl Iocc,cs on the action former Convention anu
IL wa Indispensable that We shon!d kiio" - ~ -,
their action before we could niellsen'E c'"''"-'
Mr Iioana u Y = said the proposition ne "lIe vas
that tie order q .' '." should be l"r"m . - =;
.:hI. him prc>,i report for The purPoss ~ '' u
TO committee The proposition ." tt se"tisr''h ron
"Hio related rn.ly different marr lie hob" the
r,I, ~ the day wpUi l.. postponed Tor 'H" purpose.
order q the day b.. general consent postponed
Il the purpose indicated
Mr Holman 0: New ro:., 'h.n reported the d-e.;
Which had been prepared and printed and offered Il
r,,ctivn with /; the ing resolution:
Resolved II :hc House OF Bishops concur Tia; tie
poT, ut the Join, Committee appointed 80 di:"r the caHo
OF this church. lie referred 10 Joint Committee tano
o: each House TO consider and report what action Ia rr!.
iion t" the repeal Of c%tn. canuhs may lee Necessary in
case j. adopted aj, also, 10 report upon any enrui
tory additions - The same which lazy he submitted e'ly:
to such committee hv either House mas BE- sE,s'. v
!..e'n"rS ~ such committee.
vi. II. remarked that the report presented rur,u
AZ: :" ia" order %! the la. Convention simply di-
-: 20! the Canon. of the Church withou; aIt,pu. 20
make any alteration for Any chang. hy terl would have
mater" Convenience a"i placed IL az appendix. Il ~
de- Ean!c I; ii should referred To- Joint coi;,c. %
ii" ilu'lst- r9 t!ir purpose "l ast-rtIlnis
C.'oi>, IL any, should b. repealed aad swha addition.
should tee made for hr purpose of consistency fer any
rrFpc,r. Tie resolution offered ,!rrr- 90 I"iu;
committee composed OF The Committee CIEpnS III each
Mr Newton, OF Ma.saca. .'ts said he an objection
!" ii'r rc-n;!ru - offered II tool. from :- House the
Ehi 20 independent action. lie th"U- IL should
committee "f n> House for consideration before briss
submitted f"r tie join; consideration O.: u" hisli"p,
Rev Dr. iiwS' Of New York. said that II the gents
from Massachusetts understood all tie facts q The case e
would hc content 10 allow i 10 r. direction Indicated
IN Ia resolution. iic AMI the gentleman from Ne" York.
wh" oarraI the resolution ~rr" hat :wu of u committee OF
preparation 81 Tie Digr, they should have voice in ir
trfiunIng what changes should I've recommended 20
made. The C'mnii'cs which prepared the Dig: saw
many DISCREPANCIES which soHi he corrected hut they had
II" f'--;" correct item. lie quite content that ~
II; 'eit committee should pa, upon them il II Vas ~.
Sol oi The Convention hU: hy ouy' she Conmi''-e,
CsnOns 81 tie two House, tie Committees t,s, r..
paF,G I" consider the subject.
Mr. Smith. OF ; c, mu-, Olsen, from til. mode Il pro
ccrd!nss Where was the necessity OF Two bodies HEY
were not % consider and report upon matters i"!sis@sa
Rev pr Hawks said the -cuCr: ~ III, j7ilt action a.
committee OF Tie 40 Houses. lie only desired ~ a' ~
r"r should 10 join; committee for consideration.
Mr. Smt. Of : C., said :ha, made the matter nue.
the The action u! she two Houses GOU "a" sUl jet
should hcindcpenllyIt Of each other.
Mr. Conrad ii Va, remarked that il there auytin.
ne" ~ Tia matter might he dcsirIr 20 nave consider
81 10y this Iousr separately before gong ;oii' commit
tee But there nothing uew IN ii, cod" Of laws Try
had simply arranged the Law" they exist Where, th"n
ua> 'c necessity Tor considering the matter separately
BOT" Houses were familiar with ia" subject, AMI I" refer
10 !"u, comm.. would ave tine an, scare action upon
!: during the present session which could not b" hal Il The
whole U cci had 20 br :GI. >I.Cy.. v 'c e.g
tlpsHIu !gCm SUu.,, Carolina.
VI %c"i"' OF Massachusetts,. not Convinced =: any
t'g Ice hn heard of the propTiciy NJ the pursued
ry III" mover & the resolution.
Tie tl,ion u"t whether Tho Cni" right" "TFsES
eel They" doubt o:iha;, IN; Whether s
- b." the law c III" Ch!Tc: And f1E ii purpose should
- b"for" ind PENDENT minds L., t"T.iu-c az |fn'"~
have lad ~, su.c before them hrrr;orr" and the C"c
- Ia great c.tci; their work. There ~" feature OF the
Code wfic ;.e. alteration aud ior that pgrpr.r hou!
yr'dv. committee. lie had objection TO
that. Tie Committee ShoGlI haze the hcir' Il s .dTre
q ;h".c gentlemen who had prepared It, i'"y ni-h! he
placed the Committee; hut hr thought u" Committee
themselves should be composed %! Iry men.
He offered the ol!own: Substitute ur the resolution
~ the Gentleman from New i"r.;
K,.DIvr,i If the House Of Bishops CONCUR Tia' tie pro-
ip>al - The join, committee, APPOINTED I" 's'i the q.
& the Church. Ice referred - joint special commit
consider auI r-p"f; wl,: action ia relation 20. and
report II existing Canon, iay Ice necessary IN 4 i
adopted aai, also, report upon any recommendations
addition. to which may II" submitted to .uc,
r"inn'ee ny either House or nay h' suggested D! n"
h-r, II such committee.
Rev Dr. Mead .4ii hi, amendment proposed to take
The .Ai,'US la. - e." Church and lag ! before
,p-S"! committee Tie proposition "r- mot 80 "Eitta i'N
law. II they 90 enact lg. where j. the matter
end: |! tbs be- referred TO special committee 10
.ia.r Al; ... matters .r-n tie Convention wi!! not 90.
Alb, u ,-c %? tnr ' lrc' IL tx week, ir" months.
aDrllrru. 20 - mad Gt's rnd. what committee
proper consider he sG'-er the Committee
Canon which has had tie matter lad'r their cai:e: II
any tcr iaam ~i,hr :" repeal any particular tahrn, j.,
ia l.as- proTc,r:. 80 The committee and il would
haze due consideration bat d" not 'ri tie "i" Law u
the G. Urch to p"S committee Tor revision.
TIL" amendment SIS rr'rr'ri.
Ty resolution Ic-ei 3! Vi Hoffman N,sii,u a'oI'-
ADDITIONAL Mrrr"rs "r COMMITTEES.
Rev pr stevens, II Pc, morr'I suspend tie rl!c' 1!
order for he Iurpvs, ~ Introducing rg5lu'iun that the
President h- authorized 30 appoint additional members
each the Committee OF the General theological >smint-
~ the Committee D0ne.iic dIl Fur-i:n M!ou, all
the Commute" on CLnon'.
III. rules s. lHdcd, aHi i;-y. Dr. stevens IN U-
ting his RESOLUTION stated tia: We Lave now u Western Do
aud !, Eastern D.ncc>t> but that on al the Important
large majority 81 the member. had been ar
pointed from the East IL offered the resolution tor tie
PURPOSE Of giyn. HE President opportunity q! ?p,-
IN. tc-. additional members from the Wet.
MIR Chambers Of Maryland, suggested TIA; Mi motion
rather reflection Oh Ii" President 70; not havn pro.
Irry constituted 81. Committee. lie hng'l tia: uch
reflection would b. made I"haI rlrrD dissatisfaction
expressed viii III. Committees dry 70" con''i'
;urr,I.
ne P.e,lcn. observed! that In appointing the Co..a,;
tees l. I,dy Il Fu!s 10 make n" changes unless i':erc
was good for H. lie could TO: ""l! make such
changes wilhou, creating nd feeling oilcrwi.. h. would
~ soon have western mel ~ Eastern men.
Rev. Dr. Mead thought would b" better not 10 rnl.rr"
The imporIau' committee, ian necessary. Que
additional member would give he Wet fair represents
,ion upon '-- committee, and larger number would r.
tari rather than facilitate the tra Ic1n % business lie
moved 70 strike out two and insert "nn".'
Rev ur Stevens said he would accept The amendment.
Mr. huntington. from Conn, differed from hi. colleague
q. 10 the number -. members which shout he added 20
each Of these committees great amount ri labor J.
thrown the Committee Canoas, !0r Instance enough
occupy them the entire session. and he "as about .nr
that three should he add. 20 HAT Committee instead
number would be retained in the resolution u VA"
that the business Gprnr'icncd aucgs ihc
,arml ,rs v; III" COMMITTEE
Rev d. M,I! ri that in large Committee sou mus:
lave quorum transact business and the larger IL. C".
u.;.-e the greater world b. the difficulty Of obtaining
quorum and consequently ~ iftGshct.ng huslnc-s III" al
4 f4FI# TIM
~. r,css would Just t. their hands Tie Committee nov
have 70 work day AMI nhr and aiding 10 their ruUhcr
= culi Only Increase tie difficulty.
Mr. un'in said. that II the gentleman from Penn
,yyana satisfied with the number adopted by him,
m would make motion To amend. h"a:h, N his opinion,
,lr,. additional members should be provided lor
Rev ~. said hc would aGt.:e 20 TIE nniHA.r.
;yn. as originally proposed b? lin.
Tic resolution was adopted snd the s",idett appointed
on the Committee III. General Theological Seminary.
Rev nr Adams Q! Wi.con,ia, AMI NJ: T. - fors, Of Zen.
iICsS.c.
On tie Committee On domestic and Foreign Missions
Rev ! =. C!trc, Of M. and Viz. L. Is. OTIS, OF ILL.,
On the Committee CaEoEs: Eer H. A. tlarsscn, j.
y. e H., aui Nj. II. +. Baldwin. Of Mich.
PLACE or MEETING.
Rev r. Taibo', % la, moved that the Convention lis.
pcsc Nth the regular order Of business for ~" present,
ipr r purpose Of taking W the resolution offered 10y hin
Yesterday, providing for 'e meeting 81 the nexi Conre''
tn. o-d,r Of cuisines. wa suspended f,r tha' purpose
Rev. Dr Talbot commented upon ~. course 81 the House
Yesterday in res0r;ng Parliamentary tactics 10 defeat
lir,c, vote. They prepared I, yo;" upon i j:
majority Of the lIou.e IN favor o' re,in:a Chicago.
the vote might weiI be- taken ~ once.
ic ga. laid ne had wish {" resort 10 P"rTmcrl.
taccs bu, ht opposed I'll" RESOLUTION fog III" reason a,
he belle rci womd secure tn" aticndanccoi oily limited
umhrr e! deputies. aud becaus: business transacted In
such manner Ia nook corner, would no. CON.
nnnd that universal and respect whc should attend
The action Of the Convention.
Mr. gugsi-. Of New YORK. hci! IN HE hand IL" Report of
Ire Episcopal Church showing That teT. were seventeen
Doccses on the Atlantic border, fifteen West Of the ALE.
,,Iic, and one on the FAR distant Pacific
IN. question is whether that vas. s,erior has he
.ht to AK that the Convention; shall visit them: The
question will soon arise whether there shall lee rctuia.
nj place for the Convention and Hha, place hai
Ie selected,
Is any man shorsich;ed tosuppose that the narrow
.lp o. country the Atlantic permanently control III"
power Church: That power would certainly into he
great Valley Of the Mississippi The general principle must
lire, be decided Shall the Convention hnreiis Washington
hall II have s place Of permanca: sitting. continue
meet from place to place: Both propositions have their
advantages The Church Of Rome have held their councils
moi; always II ever In capital cities hni at scgucst"rcd
ons such as Lake Constance or Trent, in the Valley of
c roll Thcy has not considered II Necessary to hold
lem a, Rome. The principal seat Of their power hut they