Weekly Council Bluffs bugle. (Council Bluffs, Iowa) 1857-1860, 1859-05-25

y
~ W
II ! : =
s lssr 4 sAs - ssn
a. fsaB ii 70
Ih5 ~ - susnAle sssy ne
d sasax IL axlsnding shs area Of SlAv-
~ so saanasng tEs ares 81 RFssdon.
j ssw wnsks since We aeaiesa rome a.
lhsas assertions and Asws shaugha pref.
"a ahslr fslashooda. ID rsply q shas ar
IEsle 10 saisor ~ the Hasek Egs offers
ns eggassat ~ provsenr posisiep false.
bkt haa aecsaasA ID his Old gama III sals-
lalasheed AID asasraioa. Hesn il 4
III k s
A| IS
s. 81 81
i III w ID Faak9 ssz aesss s0 shN
Sieve @smhaas a@a esfsain 10 basQxna
IASs kexfiAAxS Mhas neansrea Eiarisfa,
zsaAissaEsas aa. OsIlfoFaaa ard Agi-
soaia, as woaaas II II soalds hare
paahtsa slayary on svssy Asse
i sAass aag ssplA il TO sboys dsela-
sasiaps Ca i - psovsd falsss We
think il san.
u sAs Arss piass he asserts tAats tsshs
Dsnoessaas party ~ asssr bssn anxieua
70 aeqnira tsrrispEys sxpeps in . sossih4r.
~ diFectioay csustiaaaana 10 Saapa Statsal
aad essaasa 10 beeomss 6Iess Tsrsaeesy
Tks sassshSoA og shs ahoTs AsssrsioH
Is proved b. : References I'd tie asqaisi-
tion Of LeuisiAna, a. 4 vas then called
uhiSA axsanasa srsm shs nssaAssss iiHsgti
Of tbs United States u ths southern linn
It's Of me prsssnE State Of Eoufstazta.
Does tha editor % tbe Hack Eys dan,
thaa such was the extent Of the esssioE
from Frances IL he cannot make tia
denial, how can hs claim 10 be man d
ssaaA when he asserts shass Hthe Demo
cratic party neysr has been anxious % ae-
qaiFs ssEFitory exsspt In sosstAsras di'
Esstlon.s What portion cf this vast
purchase was contiguous 10 Slave States
and what portion Of it was @osrfain 4
become sIase Territory ~ Lei the FIRES
States Of Iowa, Mlnnssota and Oregon
and the Erss TsEsitoEis d NebTask&, De,
cosah and Washington, answer.
Sc much FER ths sditar's aFst ehAEg'
againss the Democracy.
Now FOR charge ko,2. sis (ths Dem
ocratio patty has acquired FlOFid@
Louisiana, Texas, California aud Arizo'
uis, and would II il could, hare plaasss
slsvsry on every acre.
Is this 60, OF has Mr. DanhAm ssyarn.
sd'' little ?
We bsIieys thaA Il 10 gsnaFally adnits
ted sbat If > person, or party procurss
any thing for the purpose Of applying Il
10 a particular purpose, and desires Il
apply it TO thaa purpose qtEsr IL Ia pro-
cared, and has sha power TO apply H.
that the person or paxty will make th'
application intended.
Nov, tbs editor admits thai the Dem.
sxass acguired Louisiana. He viii. Rol
deny that Iowa, AhunesOta and Oregon,
are portion Of lhe LOaisiana acquired
he asserts that aha Democrats woult
if they could have planted slavery on sv'
cry aere Of thia grand acquisition
Nov let as pursue the subjses little far
ther. Iowa, Minnesota and Oregon
we're Dsmosrslio territories. The Cen
Ventiou that framed their Constitu lions
for a State Government ware composed
of . majority Of Democrats. The 0oH'
vsntions, then, sscouid If they would, ,
have framed q Constitution recognizing
the rigat Of the eitiGsns Of theas Rsv
States TO hold Slaves.
The IsEEitogiss were DsmoeFstie and
the Democracy "eould IL they would,
have Adopted 3 slaye Constitution
Sow, IL the DsmosEasy "woaId If il
could, hare planted Slavery on every
acre" Of these threa new States, why
did they not do itf If this Territory
was acquired for the pnrposs of extend
ing tss area of Slavery, and il the De-
nsoerAey desired to extend the area Of
Slavery, Why did it not make these shEae
States Slave STATES. The Democracy
had majority ia the Conventions that
framed lheiE ConssltatiOns-Ehsy were
ia the Majority ia the New ssates, wbsn
they were admitted into the Union, aud
were admitted by Democrats votes in
Democratic Congresses, and In opposi-
ton to the votes Of the party opposed to
the Democratic party. These facts
prove eepelusiyOly that this statement OF
the editor is also without foundation.
The balance OF the editors assertioas
ID reply 10 our article, are eBtitled to
abont as mach credit a. lhs Two ahaTa
referred 10. We mag notice them when
-. 4 - - a,.s.-....s