New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-11-14
BROWN vs.. BROWN.

To lle Editor Of TAe ". Y. Tribune
SIR: While in Kansas in June last, was acc-
dentaly favored with information touching the
shady" side of Geo. w. Brown and his charity
bought press. Such information came from one OF the
chief officials of the Teritory-a man standing high
in the favor of the Administration-and the import
thereof was by fattering to the character OF
said Brown.
Possibly Mr.. B. is battered with the belief that his
voluntary bargain and transfer to the Black De-
mocracy are known only TO himself and the agents
and attorneys of said Democracy if so, his conf
depce has been most wckedly abused. In one in
stance at least the story of his treachery, and fine
history OF his Pro-Siayery services have been con-
fded to Republican carr. And this he may take
az evidence that lis labors IN behalf OF Sham De-
mocracy are nearly finished. There Is such a
thing as baseness too disgus,ingly base for
even the Negro Democracy OF Kansas. This may be
regarded M q mootable question. Yet l am honestly
of the opinion that Brown is meaner man than Is re-
ouired to advance the cause of Slavery, and uphold
the present Administration. believe this because
the testimony thereof is ample and convincing, and
because have been thus informed by credible re-
preventative Of Democracy, the terrltorial oHcl-L
mentioned above.
The information thus given to me was substantially
that Brown and his press had for years been used to
suit the behests of the Kansas Democracy that the
Free State" disguise in which The Herald OF Free
dom appeared preserved in obedience TO the al
vice OF Democratic Headers" that Brown received
satisfaction OF ms tftCicrN Nll phtIphl2t
disposal OF the Territorial Administration, and that he
was ready whenever requested 10 remove hls nsisS,
openly espousc the of Slavery, and become the
defender OF the present National Administration ~
This would have been done long since, and The
Herald of Freedom authorized 10 speak in behalf OF
Buchanan and Black Democracy, had Brown sue
ceeded in winning she confidence of his employers and
proving his fitness for the post to which he aspred
But instead he has been constantly suspected by those
who purchased him with their money. IL was argued
that n traitor TO the cause of Freedom spy III the
camp OF the RepubEcans-m be induced TO betray
the cause of Slavery and flee from the ranks of Sham
Democracy Hence il is, and for months has been,
the purpose of Democratic managers IN hanss 70 get
rid of Brown purchase his press, and make Ihs Her
aid of Freedom the undsguised organ OF Kansas De
mOcracy.
such is George W. Brown. Such is the man that
had the good fortune 10 suffer imprisonment and loss OF
property at the hands of Border Rufans thus winning
HE svmpathies OF the friends of Free Kansas, and
through such sympathes securing funds to pay for the
press with which he has for more than three years
been rendering traitors service to the very power
that cast him into PRISON and destroyed ms property
Ave and such is the man at present employed In PUB
Gshng wicked ISLANDERS against the unfortunate John
Brown hoping thus TO add gall TO the bitter cup now
pressed 10 the white lips of that feeble, wounded and
diving old man. Such is the author of the charge that
John Brown is guilty OF unproyoked murders In
Kansas . 49,,
What picture Of cowardly malice What a slun-
tsry display of ruthless hatred and revenge What
discusting exhibition of cowarhce, corruption, and
yiainy And is this infamous story 10 pass current
N even for Democratic circulation and credit Is II
10 be believed even BY the hasrs and reyiers oil oid
Brown Does the traitor Brown himself believe II |!