The weekly hawk-eye. [volume] (Burlington, Iowa) 1858-1860, 1859-09-24

II
y.
= - - i -
IIP1
"a
Hi q d = ll
N. -. M A
nj - 9# W
~ 6 Id
w u. go. - asS 4
~ 49, $3.50
y ~ pSS =, - sngco snas Sen..OI .auSIs =,
vno 1claa, ~ $500 as.,i i 49,.
2. nas0.s nspso.'s. -. s .Ssi,.n.s -.
49, .@ ~ - ~
gwen ~ sns ffiends q fagn: rnas ~ ss1s.s.sD
-. 80 , 80 8 -, Il 80. -.
AN sasy 49, ssek..Rss - ~. -. =. -. n.ah.
f{-ssL 80 49, ~. S.@as 49, !.
~ wns1sns , ce1sl.'y ~ONl nsss
- -. !, X.
$780, = 49, posS g 1890 -. 49,.
1e'UOeOu - 49, .s.-0s.Ss:,sS = era
~ los. csp1O',y' n,. ~ "a
.1 sas.ss 1, 49,. .hS'- - 80 s1
Einsys1uSs4 !, ~ spoHsst: I.fa ..al. IL. h.a
81 Sens.YE4 lno.n salG q I.pPy u.
.nouSn' - spPeal.ns s'Oae - NV y
tnous0 ~ usu no - eoctr IL y. :.
= =, -.
vllo = ~ Anpse esA4s p a.ns msss-.sx 80 ~
49, s 80 tsasn sns lesI y Z.
Man E'sn.sLas .ne Planc.p' e ou'"AlA .s.'1ss
~ eu0aO.Ou.Asu, = s'ss - -. ....
fIne present polsacai pafslss 9! We coonIy
- g recent 0F'ean. sNs'spes eAsss 49,
lt9an nve years. Inn y &c true o. tne 70 callep
Democta s parry - - y 81 we nePuo', Ss
parry fheN pnno'pses nsld ~ sGe 1eP.oa Is
cans are nos new pfsnc Pees.., ahey nave eAs.sS
Snce tDe lcun0auon 0t tne Union snou&n unoer
ainerent names ~ the gays - SsAe1son sney
we're calied nepuOncan: 10 tue Gays 81 0scA-
son tney Became Democsauc' an sne says -
Piercs ana buchanan, tney are calico hepnOM-s
can. Names are OF no account. frinciples are
everything. ea ,4, s.y.
fnor 20 1893 the question: OF the DAY relaseu
20 matters o. nnance, 70 protective eerins, ana
% the United State Banks. In 1854 eli this
Vas changed, and the, great Question became
one Ct Freedom or Slavery On this question
alone are the present great parties constructed.
The Democratic passy requises ano other test
than this. Old wings, who still subscribe 70
the Henry Clay doctrines on Tariff and Finance
y they only agree TO the Kansas Nebraska. Act
and the spread OF slavery, become born anew,
ana are good reliable democrats. The Demo-
cratic Church hAsiwlde open doors. All sorts
| OF opinions can get IN easily, on compliance
with one little obligation. There are no thirty.
nine Articles 70 subscribe to. Only confess
your faith - the Kansas Nebraska act, and you
become member in good standing. ~ s /
N The primary questions between the two par
| ties is, whether the Territories shall De Kept
free and 90 form Free States, or whether they
/ should all be open to the encfoachments Oh
/ slavery, aud eventually become Slave States
This is the great point Of dispute. But beyond
this there 10 another matter. The question then
becomes'whether Or not the Executive power
shall be welded for toe advantage OF the sla-
| very ,extensionists. The Democratic party act
| in the affirmative OF this question. For years
when in power they make the appointment Of
Executive officers, with this end in view. ~ s+
y The policy Of the Republican party is first to
keep the. Territories free from slavery. We do
not want 70 interfere with slavery in the States
| where it is already established by law. But if
| the Republican party were in power, We should
expect that cur foreign minister and home
| judges would not endeavor to acquire territory,
and interpret laws solely for the express pur-
| pose Of extending slavery. There is great cry
about the Republicans wanting to Rgislate
| against the South. The Republican party does
not want to do 80. Its design is to legslate for
| the benefit of the whole country. There are
| only $50, 900 shareholders among the ZOO, 900
white population Of the South, or the %, O00, 600
i white population of the whole Union. The par
4 ~ calling itself Democratic legislates for the
benefit Of these 500, 900 and against the balance
/ Of the 2O,OOO,OOO. Call you this Democracy ?
It is building up class at the expense Of the
many. It is creating an actual Aristocracy
There is some difficulty in defining the exact
doctrines Of the Democratic party, but it appears
to be laid down in an article contained in some
Of the Democratic prints within STEW days,
4 and which 10 attributed to Attorney General
Black, the highest legal officer Of the Admins
! tration. ~sa7Iu4E a .4s##s 8a g5.l g.f VIZ II
He there says:1 -s 44@4 e@a a5 sY.Hss
i g"The Constitution certainly does not estab-
4 lish slavery i'm the Territories nor anywhere
| else. Nobody in this country ever thought or
i said So But the Constitution regards a sacred
and inviolabie ali the rights which citizen
may legally acquire in the State. j If 1 man ac-
quires property Of any kind in State, and goes
with it into Territory, be is not for that reas
on to be stripped Of IT, Our simple and plain
proposition is. that the legal owner Of slave
or other chattel may 60 with il into u Federal
Territory without FORGETTING his title. ssot.1a,,
| .'sWho denies the truth OF this. and upon what
| ground can it be controversial The reasons
which support it are very obvious " and very
I conclusive. Asa jurist and statesman Mr..
| Douglas ought to be familiar with them, and
| there was a time when he was supposed tosun-
| derstand them very we'll We will briefly give
him few Of them. \, t..s.4 tayl sa tla'E .G1
| .It il an automatic principle Of public Law.
that right Of properly. private relation, con.
dition, or states, lawfully existing ia one STATE
or county, is not changed by the mere removal
Of the parties to another country. unless, the
law Of shat country be in direct conflict with
| Nov If, as Judge Back holds, the consstu-
ton gives citizen Of any State q right toitake
his property into Territory and there hold it
as if under the laws OF the State from which be
emgrated, then it legislates slavery into that
Territory II a man can take his slave from
Missouri into Kansas, and hold him there ac-
cording to the laws Of Missouri, under the Con-
sttution, then slavery is legislated into Kansas
.h th;nn a.. I, ~ R,as uoes
prove by the constitution itself that it does
ne nrst asserts tne argumen. g ee fact, treats treats
g .uns n.ssf quss.loneu, anu lnen goes on
IAN - g - tAonia,ic ptlne,pis 81 com