New-York daily tribune., 1859-07-01

,soob1 Esrnsge W. Ray ds-d, 'sasi.s WI ey
~neh the suik ~ k,s properly -. IN 20 ne enisars,
by ~ fc.f w. Abs1t t~s cSonib- afi>f bf- os'D
tie -.eyh1 -be gave Darh - Yl.t:snJs- shhi-
TrI@y tS.ss tie seoyDo viz cSHs lni1
Ger, zt1 atp,ls5 f5f 80 b JDesFJa - refss,n the
eJ,cu,or frt asvo-jbg o. tbs sst..c .; ne >sta,r
Il ss.-sdsDes sda ti,e sern1- Of nc snL
Her o,ans.l c>a'@tSs7t rIst to .eesnf nNr age,
Hsyi4 oceurr.1 4iiey ,ss rnsking II e NJ .s1 isae
II ,oeb sssusgs Iyrn. tbs all became revoked, "a
sce.goauce VITO s,S.1's - ,hs, Sa-ef.
C011sel ior the slst wife o9ssb4-d ths. tss secohf
marriage Sa> gysc, bsceGss IRE brs- = v-s hvIng
when I took vse-, .nd the osase II divorce Lad sa-
jyired hlu! fiom nlaryis AGAIN.
To nee; rtis, 4 Va said thG the ,estein bad pfo
cured Giyorcs from bis brs wife n COnoscicu bf
tbls oId BsH sspesT 10 the pssS1lE2s II "a d-p az
g.d fbs, siBIlf 0n ,sd i-.Ds iscsu-e r,-r> T.>
q judgment II be Court admitting the Wi - prJb<,
sG tAs s1scxT nsi dgiy qga.sns 2bc gwen s.eHr'.
The Js1ee, tDD nnJrDing sGd nc matter eDn,1s|l !
rf.oy aiI>siar; pint. N1sc ,oo1ld D. t'e sab,T o.
arguinsnt and fr TIE purp-s Ot te-.n2 ne merit u
TIE cs>s - Or3ersd preliminary inJai.eiioo - ~
preventing The s1scutT from dsy@iD2 VI Inc e,ttS
sxeett IL payment If febt> funeral charges, nnth
the qs..t.on u ne yali1iy u the sseoDt msfrass
durg the l5e of me frt zfe sb Al have been de>r.
unD.d or NTH The fnrLh-r order Of The Court
JAnss 4. brady and 4. J.. Hearne for hr-i WIFE a.
". Bradford iI -scOId siie.
TBE TRC@T CASE.
Mar Tf.S ss. Jos~pb =" Tf.s-
Drdey Of ref.feLc. ~ Cba-. o,nA,, esqs w css
pro diss ss,.d of9@y On on' 'as snH ,n- asti N-sy
- N. osi, sne u sy,ri NE ss.asy ~,n d. .pnsa
al niS'iffs ir<St
TN Il sluI.nJ sLh - Ispor ts"reon-
Ssuss AZ Bfms.
Petition for aiuoby deaied, n5Out co-'s, and win
Nt3ty spis,.oa Afr N pos saa nave eeea
uE.d.f the of,@r n rrfefercs
TBE BAKDEsEhDog DIVORCE cssE.
Re- - A. H~ra-nbns.k az. WIN a Hafssn'f<h
Tbis actVb fH diyDrcs wa cDDcinbsi I'M. m"rninS,
by a. ofdsT h0n cOaGLg re e ,s iefef--
g.nsng osrse q drrse IL fsvH - ne vile, pn u~
srYggd 81 aoosfy. To cs.dy a The chfr-n sg~D D.
tfs falh.f ,s yngi-s' Il tue ntber ~ vat tlrin
hx Tsfu. TESz-BekIe JUstics PigsEEyO>r.
PEDHIsBDfT aOfL tAsE
ssnlasl ". O4id Admlnsfator, L. sg- Hsny IeISr.
Tia. piaIbtH as giuinstfapT u BebJ1iniD d. Ben
s dseess.o susd W the 4 gf nls-yry
fsA.. fg IN .sc Dsd- .n iSr by William TsyDf, d"1--1
ad the nt sbr I, P4fk BsnaaD, IN rc'f"f
hnnoft In. 3t.s iltI t@ I.ssssn 4 B"LJfnn
H BIsL bfoneI Il TOE payes, tbFD iD - AD-f 81 army
by usnsfY who s4bssq. q.cfty did sHd ne pinh, as hs
Taylor iu faD 'hr nnt's nyW 10 sin
tfAi u th, su spps4T.d that sach ~ hr nDt"s had
h4e altered an4r thr Dy STp.ti u the I'd,
with t.r.si pr c.gt" H. sbpNn hJ~rsrf, ha, tie
lhsrl0u p6ds W sTangT ~hD had m l~r",t 10 ne
tesinpuy fegaTdnT the atr.il"u ~
dueed yeid T The psiDn l'asing t- I.stiph VI
sg.c, 81 ti alteration D. the opinion ~ ia" If
aypssl h- o. neral Term, tte v"f0ic F, ai ana
lal sfaDi-d The ground t1si ths Inh hY4i have
slt"faoD f1de whDut the sbdg- aud
a,s %, II III. p.yee ecgsfed Ia ne sc,o1 mssgTh
William isyr dd tbe present al, brought ~ fec,sef
~. from fhs c'iendaLt pau nas-f
Peri B.uitnn The psy"e sss'kamn'd a.a ~t"s and "sl
b. tHw HIF u the staiIOD V bs npt'., snh 10.
other ng .ub.anstef By .s1s0ce verdict S.> endfrd
loI the plaintiff fOf the amount u to Ep with iLNffi-
AJCaO.
u. UPTON Gr plaintiff; Dayton ID. Todd i3r defsndAu