New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-10-20

ro'its copy q. let:' fr h H0uor M,y.r s:iTsssd
% o. ,..r.et;.. ~ case q ssTp Asi - CRY 4.
tslsl by sppes t.yr spr- s1t
.v, if ha tss .sSeia : az. = .. ,so7. Of
ire ~ feIes, exc sdti q tst- scoupsc ne
Object o,sirea.' D., ssyor al yourself
10 reply hare The the "vhoI-" h~
tesu sls.'y rou,y rpon 40 AZ ne fics
hare. TIE us.iners specs. % b foased 9ps .i It el
sroune H. ho~ever 90 have reason t. s.ve h.i tas e
oo'sii'd eoAn'vsY or ma Is t.tsd -iiI 'nJ racd 80
vii coumuIioste to n sr!1nt The rc-Ets Et!h
tts,l q ,oe.e 9ppo.- 70 L vi b so h,efy 70 ,.s
bisd there ~ SCI ire egelt aoe II cLnot Of co1r,
.a querior. Of tie lBi 70 rec,r-r these be p...ed
uPot by the Law Officer Oftt Corp alton
s.ai EICH b BUSTED, Coea.e fIi:a- corpo .tios.
DhFsaIHt an % sisaS:i o,tls'
Tear S In .nswrr yo1I letter 4 ta l.. Inst. re.v-
IL, Gaze hsVe h,; By sbeIoe fron IN
account Of sckneis reached onJ his orIig s5t 10
reply th.r, ssy that il my opi oe decision
q gle referee ,hoald 20;
ira uLt tie tssl are .frmsd y or Carts
even il uss.e bno. corp3ni u. ia damage. AID
amounts 70 al allegation Of I'll. Il the Corp3rsaou-
The referee aecdss rs. he ui.msLt q Superior Corr in
the Murrsy case bnag n ie; re shows ;s,t &c c,'e
a. ~. rssmen o. DE rllr,e founded manly up9u the de
e'cn in ihe Many oa'' cusa ;hs city 70 submit Il ne preset
1t appear point. The referee.
pot which raise SERIOUS questions OF law snd suppose o,'e
TIA before Court sad jay and tnu' have toe
q .sdoI. Of az pissed rPon p the Court
ROBERT HAws Controller.
RICHARD BUSTED, eco Clifo'..loL CorGsel
Law a NV o6D ely 70 o. ~
No ~ Broadway. Jny 9. 1855 y
RosT. T. HAws, ESQ Controller, &C
date Jolly In from ,oa, uods'
I mr. rccTerto BY Jscob shaip assl., the city
BY reference to ny T. ter. yoq az o.:.r.s ,nat s2:e,
10 qu,n' Of fact AID suggested isa would lei Vuole you
TO aid in o.ierultins Tie !s~ OF ne ca'e ,,
AeI stating that the case Dad been Vigorously confessed
upon the fsc law AID hat to Judgment sp,ea-d 70
have legal bass said tina; II sou 70 be-
1t IL with any fraud. aud vii communicate 20 Ia
WHITING ne fCrnd, Upon ~hich either OF th.e supposed %
gill be hsppy MAKE appropriate q '-cA is on
application to The Court oa'ed EefeuPou " se' Inc JUG
In your reply under date Of he 5h in you appear
overlooked Jhr pona upon sbCn desire !liJTmNion
You express tie opnicr that decision Of sDss Referee
r 20 ss. az amount should not anti ais
cuiors coninrd By Coars sad tea the .noan,
should BE- had ard $50 that ID. Ct the Referee SEN
Gus questions which sbod be P.''ed upon bg the Court
You ntiu you know Of fact which casts
pcion upon the Judgment that have grounds tor believing
It ssObsned BY oolu'icu, OF founded il fraud
IL was those questions INTENDED 70 direct your attention,
and TO whirh sgsin nov solicit a. sn'~er .
In this eoaltc'iop !, prop, tha, should 'as't to YOU
.s pin pe, the se ,ha, involves large amour.
OF mon,y does furnish very reliable grounds which -
sch to disturb IT, sSd thai s eeoe Sge feieee prop.
rly :proiD,ee Is :, compile sn .iJas,f'on q; ~: oeoI.
after oppostion The referee gentleman % e'pectsOs
standing and requirements in profe''ion m sa
them aud Involved $3.50 S. u,er.; thereon
since hoytmber s5-l IS no; Sc s'e It ~ re- tie city
Do the favor 81 yoI let convenience 70 Communicate
20 Ia wi any kuo@eoge or sIPc'on yod rs e. which
gee. the integrity II tie judgment upon The fsca OF the
Very respectfully Jour ote ,lsIt ssryaEt
RiCAD BUSTED c uOsel FOR the Corporation.
CONTROLLERS OFFICE EesYork Jaly H. ls5s.
RIoH'p BUSTED, ESQ Corpersen Counsel .,,,
You're Of he "a r relative TO the judgment o. JTob
Sharp the Corporation received In rpy have 20
ihA letter u the ih inst .,ted to ,cg wta' be-
In reference the question whether have 70 believe
has obtained cosysy that 10 tainted with
az, fraud and tie request a. shall communist tue sIouoa.
upon which either Of THESE supposed to rest can ody say
TIA, do lot know Of facts going TO establish ether cono
sion, nor is 1t IN my poser 10 'ho" nai any aIa 81 ool'oA
perpeuated IN procuring h- report o. me Referee
The facts constituting this mas, all be known 10 you and
in ny view the remedy OF the COOPERATION or remei rs"
be found these and IN tie erroneous ' oonoeve legal
suce NY you upon this ubect, to
change the views therein eIgressed.
r r. hAws Controller
The Controller now, four or five months after the
correspondence, commenced proceedings TO open the
Judgment On the ground of fraud, and employed Mr..
Noyes under the authority Of the act above referred TO-
The argued today. Mr. Noyes on tue part
Of the Controller dsclsmed any mpuaion on the In
teerty or ability of the Corporation Counsel or those
employ ed by him in the case, and insisted that 1t Was
lar for the Controller 10 test his power under
the act Of 1859. Mr.. NOyes appeared for the Coz
troner ID. ID. Field for Mr.. Sharp, and Messrs. Full
ertou and Busted for tine Corporation.
Decisions.
Chester Ju6,on agt pheGs II. BiGelow.
Executing that part OF the answer winch relates %
the suppsed sale q the stock pcg coaes there 10th
ing the which shows az, defense the Psiuf holds
and has aSs' hed 1t " security the whole answer
presents Lo tai defence Motion giauied-
CIPcUIr-Beiore Ju,tice ROOSEVELT.
Israel Steinhsfc sgt John g. Boxer and john Boker
In the year 1857 complaint was made bet ween
the and LEVIN before Judge Connolly each charging
tie other with stealing Fencing the complaint the plaintiff
deposited nine hundred syeeins in one Jacob Cohn who,
according bic request deposited the with the defendants
for plaintiff account alleged in the complaint Sub" qlenty
The Levin and plaintiff discontinued sid IN
his going defendants Tor bis money they tod MN the sans
had credited Conn In payment Of debt due BY hn
brought THIS
sum The defense general denial -
beebe Dean for plaintiff; N Is. Hoxie Tor de-
PENDANTS
Before Judge Judge SUTHERLAND and Jury.
Charles H. Mills AIT. G uehus h. GArson.
This is action 10 recover amount agreed 10 be
paid BY defendant The ,nif the return Of three bonds
City Of Sacramento Caor.is for 100 each Tue de
PENDANT denies and also alleges that suit has aesd
been the consc and recoSey had on bond
for 454i original agreement having Included the four
bcpds The defendant In addition % this last defense
dsvoed trial prove that tender Of the b)ncs Aud
demand made. Verdict for plainf Tor
the amount claimed SIS 60. William L. Curtis for plaintiff
J. T. Williams, for defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CoURr-ocr. l9-BeiJrs
Judge NCERsOLL.
FORTEIIrRE Or JEWELkr.