Nashville union and American. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1853-1862, 1859-06-12
NUMBER 4if.7s


tire sprnsazI sases z-srre re COL. q tis Ceupsny.
Il IS also pcsiavey prossi y NJ aisa tat - hns
for sr m rse r a thssrlIezfsa Is ~ al -,e-- II ~
BJard lie likewise pr0rs @ azst be vsitei Yin fsIt
49, !. = Pas,is 5- fiis s
TIE g=-eral question, epS1 Ne fr uf is IS va &c &
The CupFr.ln sabtances iasIied lfrii tal ~ azi
paHy Ia sscsDed the slhiF ran q Lost AL I'D
Of hs aaQs
legation peForm Ae condition, LeFs h. aFI Pc y ~ aT
his liability. necssry that lhs Coufauy sh % hsc bad
Hocs o. sah rsvocsr, 5soru - ssssree Of De eusts
Company % retes m su cfir51 tte nt- - re fsfee1-
gss 2 - = nsSs g ss essPs3S ~ q = .
5u K hl been made Is vclnicsr lfh Re
sloaile offered by 5 m 10 ue Cousan as an i5nce
to latter 10 ioelis e E rl a 81 nssf tsn ss
han uould be The ageht q The defendant on lin
Sssf hsssasi hat . sSs AZ h .- s . ( ras
sFpssr nat H7se q he LAD ben iFa sia 20
eo~paay before he deisa ilais usPt E zen tender TO-
sId accepted - the Company uiaea thar ~ heat
ss. $780, w. 80 la ~ 81 49, ~ = = 49, 49, -
We are unable to concur E his Hoaor uroa ether II tors
Frsi. suppgslng Chsaau 70 have heea lie p co-sttz-
ted AGENT O. The Company, it is clear t his souid have
When he sassspuea con ls,s, aathor the a<-us
vas sxhaused and BIS agency as to that part uar susss p
set respecting IL 1e sahpsa iusanily enayd he
. ~. $50 !, q :. + - y ~ e'.rs, ei'es'ne
which within the c-pe q The agens pser
sequenslq, notice such assnEef Intention rzyoe hsa
scrtptau Waulihs rulg The nose IA such cas-. n cua
be ayailahle a. all must BE- 70 the Ccupanv. = =
error, we need ast arsas lie iiss.s,a1 iasibss =
81. Whether Lsl, in The alssaee q a xs ~ or,
s s9n 1t ne D s.s 50 ess4s n s5g ts s ioa,
iaitI Of hieh the suhscrip Ion i61is ne
condition ui.ina b. the Company =
useessary. peTh Is, agsi ts e-runhs
Of he prssnt sss. ne EssAs 3; e. aosy Eg7a sssn 2
eie reearsed -tanirE ofs Ehichs El
eeped acc9riag % its and upon b We Company
sHghL e be lnas Eeiee On s5s ~ ~ nos t.ite
else before Is se tsan tie e q lsiise at o seFoe1
zion by LoEe,ers TIE Coz PAY M acuifei any Interest he
suisc rtiau.
FROM The proof TIE fact be, hat Chesan
no-ihs % the Colany- n eisnnt scaptdI1 as
only proposal ntcfe 20 20 crFsrd sub
company mig screiicI Ieslaf
piea-ure Il iel1-et oousderssn aFss GOA
the Cciarany. 10 created contract ie and
tie coupsuYinl ed hading oltion rou iner, pre-
the agent The defendant. whom to-nu1ry I'D
c1nGec;Ioa itiscisar ftso long SUBSCRIPTION
miiaei in his hnos and t1Ee The COMPANY hal scqur dany
right % interest IN l. cr &c de9s s
hissif and Company gstI-4r Or revtke
sc'ipun pleasure, uctice Com sr FOR
the simple Eess9a @ az er Hs Uot ieces parry % to
fhs neglect O. Catirns ss ncio srass
" L0s vf dlyJrnp tie book q The Corpauy
70 ease Ee he presents - vi1h the ielnant q
from ayailir hi-ef ~ lis dsrse. becE %
b the Company o. De fact o. Revocation, the
COX came MO its posses ioa.
asGuca he defendants d hssH Eor lad
notice Of the revocation been given. when he sur ru toak
asdeiycrsi to- AMI acapei ~ ne Co1pang lie ifreuaB
eniit ed 10 regard he de,arants 50 seIptaF = 49, and
biadng and 10 hold him liable rF
LaSsH coa-usicr- We have che leuquy
Es accrstlly IL received me t. - SIS en fris
snd sufjct t1esrry sisacs, re ri1tez.
ls,cd a. the tine The blok cel5yer q -lcaihzE
are O. 1fnian, theefoie. tht II 4e iiad vas
nasa ana usf 10 scoyery he ns uga Ian iheian
utlineut r-te-scl
correct eepy, P. CT AK Clerk.