New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1859-04-19

Mr.. Kew snd Mrs. Si.sles 10 ue cemetery; sss them
o. the hester orce or tse and once or tsce on the
Avebse.
o. You have alluded b. this correspondence sDd lie
terrnipatio Did yOa rpesk 10 Mr. Key soOu. 1t
A. Mr.. Key came Ind talked TO me about it
Mr.. Carlule-ThSt does DO. strike M .. ms'erisl.
bmSelf toward Mrs. Sickles, but would not insist on
tbs question.
To MI Oud-Tbis salad and champagne interview
wac between 4 and 9 in the afternoon.
Mr. brady propose TO ask how, after this CORE
1T ondepca between Mr. Siokles and himself, Mr. Key
descr bes Mrs. Sick'es: How ehilolke che wss aud
how innocent and what paterns relations ne occupied
toward her; that che was mere child, and thai ne
looked On her az q father lie there ObIsctiOn %
that
Mr.. Carlisle-Certsiny. l had not the shghtest
objection that Mr.. Haskin sbOud pronounce the jag
meLt Of virtnous matron on the condact OF tnl'
woman in April, 1888 though not strictly evidence,
but do lot see what Mr.. Keys description Of ME-
Sickles hes 10 do with this csse.
Nr. Brsdy-Itis difficult for the defense TO con-
ceive what line Of remark or argument the proseca'
ton NAV puTsue &c 10 the relations between these par
ties. We know that when the relations between q
man ard q woman are called in question, suggesuonS
frequently are made about HUSBAND peins Ooo oou
fdrg too ndulgent too kind and that 10 sonetnics
tutntd into pretext in extenuson OF the act OF the
sdnltsrer I desire 10 show that Mr.. Key had com
muricsted 10 Mr.. UaskD, and intended MI uaskln 10
iuuress on the mind Of Mr.. Sick!es that Mr. hsy
claimed 10 regard Mrs Sckles as young person wno
1000 toward min Ia tho relation Of child, AND that
he vas almost in the situation denominatsd IN law 70
Ioo Darfnts and that to prevent any possible sus,
nicop On the part Of Mr.. SiCkles that be Key coad
rave toward that girl anything but honorable inen.
tiors He made this declaration which refer TO, and
which was communicated TO Mr. Sickles.
Judge-It does not appear to me thai anything nr.
Kew taid on the subject Of his relations with ME-
Sickles can be evidence or this trial.
Mr. Brady-We0, have made the offer. II 10 IN
ders,ood and do not propose to argue IT.
Mr.. Grsbam-The Court will note our exception 10
tie exclusion.
Mr. Carisle 10 witpess-YOu are rot mistaken about
the point of time. Ii s long ago az April OF last
wear that YOU found Mrs. Sckles entertaining MIR.
Kew in her own house in the absence OF her husoandi
Witness-No, Sir, i am not mistaken about the
time.
Mr.. Brady-Did you ever communicate TO Mr.,
Sckes ths fact which you have re ated on the ttand
Witness-Never, Sir.
Mr. Csrisle-Sbe was mixirg the salad for him
A. There wes large bowl containing salad with q
large wooden thing to tx 1t. Sne was using the
wooden thing Laughter.
q. Anything particular about that
A. Nothing particular.
@. And the champagne was ordinary champagne ?
A. Yes, ordinary champagne
Mr.. Oud-Iiow much Of il had disappeared
A. think about half had disappeared
The Court OF this point adjourned.
II lie true that Mr. Sickles would have preferred not
10 have Bis wiles confession published. Il is not
true however, that the paper was obtained surrep-
titiously ard copied without the knowledge Of the
council for the defense, has been asserted in the
communications to some OF the New-fork papers.
Neither lie it true that il first published in Wash
ingOn Journal and then sent TO the Associated Press.
1t wac telegrsphed to NeSYork before any second
copy wss made.