Spirit of the age. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 1849-1865, 1858-02-24
Decisions of the Supreme Court.

By PEARSON, j. In Williamson v Williams.
in equity from Mecklenburg, directing pro-
ceedings to be had to try the validity of the
first marriage. Also in Hobbs v Riddick,
from Hartford, affirming the judgment. Also,
in Harrell V Nixon, from PerquimonS, affirm
ing the judgment. Also, in Mclean v Wad-
dill, from Cumberland, affirming the judg-
ment. Also, in Creach v McRae, from Co.
lumbus, affirming the judgment. Also, in
Gamble V Breson, from Guilford, judgment
reversed and centre de moro. Also, in Indy
v Ray, from Orange, affirming the judgment.
Also, in Watkins v James, from Caswell, af-
frming the judgment Also, in Houston V
Bibb, from Union, affirming the Judgment
Also, in Powell V Cobb. in equity, from Cas-
well, declaring the plaintiff entitled to the
relief prayed for. Also, in Whitfield v Whit
field, in equity, from Wayne, affirming the
decretal order. Also, in State V Harrison,
from Northampton, judgment reversed and
rcnire de moro.
By BATTLE, j. In Bodenhammer V New
som, from F~orsythe, judgment reversed and
centre de moro. Also, in Holt V Clapp, from
Johnston, judgment affirmed. Also, in Ben
nett V Clifton, from Duplin, affirmed in part
and reversed in part Also, in Hunt V Pig
gott from Guilford, judgment affirmed. Also,
In Bost V Cline, in equity, from Catawba,
order affirmed. Also, in Shinn v Motley, in
equity, from CabarTus, decree declaring the
rights Of the parties. Also, in Vanderburg
V Sloan, In equity, from Cabarrus, decree
for plaintiff. Also, in Harris v Smith, in
equity, from Cabarrus, decree for plaintiff
in part. Also, IL Poston V Gillespie, in
equity, from Rowan, order affirmed. Also,
in Harrison v Bowe, in equity, from Caswell,
decree declaring the right Of the parties
Also, in Freeman V Okey, from Guilford, in
equity, decree declaring the rights of the
parties. Also, in West V Sloan, in equity,
from Mecklenburg, decree reformed.
BY NASH, {. }. In Caldwell v Rodman,
from Guilford, affirming the judgment. Also,
in Frasier v Walton, from Randolph, affirm
ing the judgment. Also, in Winslow V Eli
OFT from Randolph, affirming the judgment
Also, IN Osborne V Mcmillan, from Ashe, af
nrmlng the judgment. Also, in Young v
Mcdaniel, from Davie, affirming the Judgment.
Also, in Baucom v Streatom. from Union.
affirming the judgment. Also, in Pinkston
V Brown, in equity, from Rowan.
Per Curtain. Scales v Wilson. in equity.
from Davie, decree for an account. Also.
Oyerman V Moss, from Mecklenburg, in eauf-
ty. Bill dismissed. Logan v Logan in
equity, from .Yadkin, decree for plaintiff
RULES OF PRAcTIcE.-It is ordered by tbs
Court
l. That hereafter the law eases from the
2 respective circuits shall be docketed before
{ the equity causes from the same circuits.
3 2. That no case. either IN law or equity.
from the second, third, fourth, and sixth en-
t cults which may hereafter be fled by the
, consent OF parties, shall be argued or submit
I ted at the same term, unless it be fled viii
e the clerk of the Court five DAYS before IN,
{ day on which the causes of the circuit from
which it is brought shah be called but such
P case shall be continued until the next term o
the Court.