New-York daily tribune., 1858-09-28

Of lis nghts We hops the geatleulaa will opioy las
rights 10 the fullest extent, bu; threatening "a shoot
American citizens IS DO; a popular method Of main
tanning pcrsona nights in tls country.
", sre ASSURE by Capt, De Rviers that h. ,,s ri.
friends are not IN the slightest degree mixei Nh IN ,h.
Affair.". The Csp,sin says he has no kaow,ei,. Of
these parties w htcver ant his friend Bosquc, saw.
Re too I. equally unscqusn.ei with them. The state
men, ,ha, pe Rivere's friends took brandy to aai
oaroused with the prisoners Sunday night, W. Are
assured WAS made bv associates Of the prisoners who
rrpr,Seuted themselves associates Of the Zolave.
SUPRrNE COURr-Ciscvrr-Ser,. T-Bef'r- Jniye
ssirH
ALLEGED ps,tPRscricE-coxPIar DISMISSED.
J,Aa wldey Peter Pratt.
Ihis action brought 10 recover damages for
alleged ma practice. Defendant is surgeon in this
ci'y. On the 9Th Of October 1856, plaintiff unfor
tnnate 'r meeting NTH accident, by which of
the I'm Is Of LIS len hand so severely injured -
to rcidei snp,tsiion Necessary. lie called rpoa
defendant. who ampG,aled the hngcr at the second
iont He alleged that the operation WAS performed
in uRskihul and improper manner aud that h.
subjected tn great deal Of pain a. second
smpu'aor necessary, for the purpose ct perform
ing which the services of ano.her survron w,rs
engaged.
Defendant contepded that the operation was per
formed in the trst instance in skilful and proper
manner and at the place where the plaintiff requested
not work for az receive any fee reward, aud that
the plaintiff did not as requested, call upon ths
defendant again. That the subsequent injury which
the plaintiff suffered owing 10 his own carelcssness
in attending tremen perade, few days subsequent
to the operation and that to the exposure and excite
ment he then endured, the consequences which hc
complaired of were 10 he attributed.
Defondant;prcduccd large of number witnesses Of
high standing in the medical profession show that
plaintiff had been properly treated. Among them
were Drs. Mott, Post and Wood, Parker. Csrnochsn,
Buck Watson and Post, Surgeons of the Ncw-iork
Hospital and Others who approved Of the course Ia
ken hv defendant in hs mode II treatment of the
plaintiff According to the testimony Of Dr. Pratt,
plaintiff came him the day after the amputation. and
since that time he had not seen him TIL his appearance
in Conrt. II appeared. however. that ten or twelve
days after the operation by DR. lfatt, the hngrr had
all appearance II modification. and then ,he plaintiff
went o d.. Stout, who amputatedthe portion Of the
finger remaining Underhese circumstances the Judge
dismissed the complaint, stating TO the jury that theru
nothing for them to pass upon, as Il was clear
y proven that defendant had acted in proper man
ner.
Ex-Judge Dean. for defendant, asked for an allow
ance Of a percentage in the sum oi $'Ooo. on ths
ground that the suit had been improperly brought AMI
prosecuted. The Court reserved the question for con-
sideTation.
Judge Smith gave deiendan, q certificate that therc
.he slightest foundation tor the suit, and that
there nothing nthe case disclosing malpractice.
IN SCH.NBrEs-Betore Judge -SurHsRLAND-DsctsioS
Gilbert T. Everson agt. Richard T.. Everson at al
Order setted
NorIcEs-.Iudgc Clcrke will attend to Chamber
business and exparte litgated motions during the re
nlainder Of the MONTH
The General Term will commence is sttiugs at 10
O'Clock a. m. during the remainder Of the Term.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs-srseL.L TssA- -sErr. n
Before Judge BRADY.
THE HARLEM RAILROAD INJUNCTION.
Ten Eyck and wife against Tie Mayor &C., ct al.