The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1858-07-05

II lT
TiMoRE ClTY.-May Term, 1S5s.-The original Bill
in this filed by the compainants William Wood
VILE and Others creditors of Reed, Easton Company
and OF Hezekah EaSton to have sold for satisfaction
their said debts and claims certain property situate
In Baltimore county, known Lot 10 of the Baltimore
Companys lands and parts called Frcderick
sadt and Smiths Forest" 1t charges that Seth Reed
morgaged the said property May 14th 1856 Levi
Easton alleged Indebtedness of $40 OOO and
also to the said Levi EaSton September lth 1856
secure an alleged Indebtedness of $4,000 that Decem
ber 29th 1856 the said Levi Eason received an ossn
ment of mortgage of S25S017 upon the same property
executed to a certain Camus kidder September l6tu
1886 and by him so assigned to said Levi Eason that
said Levi Easton received the said mortgages and assign
mens as and for part of the of Reed Easton & Co.
and that the companans through their Equities as set
out in the Bill entitled to the benefit and advantage
thereof as creditors Of said firm
1t further charges the execution of the other mortgages
prior In date to these herein stated upon the said premises
OF part or parts thereof the one executed by said Seth
Reed in favor of certain David Reed of Boston, Massa-
chusetts, October 1lth, 1913 payment of
note of Seth Reed of the amount of $lO5l76 dated April
12h lS payable three after date the other
mortgage executed by said Seth Reed June 24h 1882
secure payment of Eote of S741 to certain Augustus
Price and Camillus Klder of Baltimore; but whether
either or both of said last named mortgages is yet
due and unSatsed whether the notes intended he
secured thereby have not been paid the companans
they have means of knowledge though they presume
from the lapse time they have both been satisfied
The Bill asks that the complanans substituted to
the rights of Levi EaSon under the mortgages first
named and that the parties answer the allegations of tLe
Bill and especially that David Reed Camus Kidder and
Augustus NJ Price answer whether the mortgages stand
ing in their aforesaid been duly salts
thereof and out of what transaction transactions they
arose, and that the mortgagcd premises be sold
benefit of the companant and that further relief may
granted to them.
All of the parties to the said Bill defendants having
duly appeared by their solicitors. and them except
David Reed and Seth Reed, having filed their answers
respectively the complanants filed their amended Bill to
the present May Term of the Court alleging that they had
been informed that the mortgage aforementioned executed
to David Reed claimed to have been transferred
about the 5th of January 1852 to certain John Toul-
min and William Henry St John and Sophia j. St John
wife of Samuel St John, Junior, that they claimed
some interest therein and further alleging that said mort
has been fully paid and satisfied and inter
est whatever passed to said Toumin the said William
H. and Sophia j. St john by said pretended assignment
and that the said parties have with said prem
ses, and that the complanants entitled have the
same sold and to receive the proceeds thereof without let
or hindrance of said Toulmn and said William H. and
Sophia j. St John, or any of them, any their parci
patton in the said proceeds and praying that said parties
together with Samuel St John, Junior answer the
ants may have the said property sold and receive the
proceeds and alleging that said defendants are non-resi
dents, and praying order of publication against them
1t is thereupon, this fifth day of June 1858 adiudged
and ordered that the compainantS by causing copy of
this order to be inserted in newspaper published
the city OF Baltimore, in each of four successive
weeks before the seventh day of July next give
the said John B. Toulmn, William Henry ST. John,
uel St John, Junior, and Sophia j. St john his wife,
the object and substance of the said original amended
Bills and warn them appear in this Court person
by solicitor, before the ninth day of October next
answer the premises and show cause if any they have
why decree ought not to pass prayed
WM GEO KREBS.
jeS-1aw4 True copy. Test WM II. H. TURNER Cl'k