New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1858-03-01
gtb ORLEANS laiIp 6rssfsut.


81
WzsHneror, Feb. Is Senofs-The arm, AN
was then takenn and the fourth section Of t,s -
ns pi. vas stricken out by vote Of "a to13
NJ " ison offered anameBdnent that TIC reda,tsr.
=. NC END o. tne year shall not operate on nv 60
at the date Of the approval Of This act Ada.,ss ~
NJ. hsmiln moved that in no case shall IL E---
created oy This act continue IN service uore dan -
desnltory discussion took pyaee al, tts ,.-s,. -
the several substitutes proposed Bot Il = sensse,.
were present, and not hafdozen were Iistesssc r.,
without coming to vote on the bin, sse Senate,
House.-Mr. H. Winter Davis made a n...,, 2
plantation, reading extracts from speech of h ~
zee gae MT Bowie containing strong language aes,nes
the American party for its conduct during he E,s
more election, saying, whilst locking 'towaras ~
Davis, You, sir, have day OF reckoning i IN
pos you under my feet you shall not live AZ hsrr
etc; Mr.. Davis said he wished to know whether bis
colleague applied this language % him2 - -
Mr.. Bowie replied that when he tins epots 4. -.
sonihed the American party and did not mean - ar
ply TINS language personally % Mr.. Davis bot to d.
party which struck down the Democracy Of Baltimore
~ force and bloodshed- He repeated tbat : A.
Of reckoning would come. There wopld Le 4 war n
tte people against such wrongs He aid moi ssx 70.
iaf NJ Davis had counseled such wrongs buf IN ~
o,a ne should takc the responsibility. He said he had
no Personai unkindness for his enIleaane ana ~,
Iem greved TO think he had wounded him. he vanl3
se sne house and the nation that he believed in 10
, y SOUL that such Nothngism would lead
/ 49, se~5 sAe fes"ntOns nud he would euuu>e
VIE usmpieo upon TO resistance. =.
nj. DAVIS replied : As 70 the opinions of bis cal
ssae .oucnlng the American party, the House Va
~. 'ne appropriate place for such q discassjon ne
rose merely 70 inquire whether the language n ,-s
uon was applicable personally TO him. and ri 80
league 8 response was satisfactory - -.
The House then went into Committee Of H. w.t.
on the Indian appropriation bin. = - : ~
MI Aolconer took occasion to reply N t7e ~.
marks Of Mr. Hatch, who had bitterly eondemnsd ~.
American party. And be sgnaized the speeeh -
tne gentleman as falsely bel0ns that orpanzetir
WASHINGTON, FEB. 9.-Senafe.-The senate 49,
up the private calendar, and without transacfju1 INV
business Of public interest adjourned till Tuesday.
House-hr Hoard rose to q privileged Question
ano sent np letter from Mr.. Burns member OF ~.
House, addressed TO him, 10 the following effesf !
On tock occasion on Friday to read from fhr Nerr
YORK Tribune false and foul SANDER aeaiust me re
TENOR Of which you know. The charges SET forth n
true, would disquafy me from holding a seat in IN,
HOUSE. foa repeated the SANDER without uroyec.
lon. I pronounce the paragraph falsehood of ne
,onest KIND IL you suppose me gnilty Of the crime
ask yon 70 examine into it's truth or falsebood II
innocent, you should set me right
MI Hoard desired 10 respond but objections ,vsv.
made. He insisted that he had right 10 he heard
Mt Burns letter was threatening and Calculated 4,
Mt. Powell called Mr.. Hoard to order. saving D.,
gentleman could explain by letter
ut. findings wanted to know whether the ftienas
OF Mr.. Burns would insist ''-
several members made objections s
hr. Hoard made another Intellectual eff,rt Ia nnake
an explanation and the House soon after adionrped