New-York daily tribune., 1858-04-24
| iAdver;l-smsntl

lAdver;i-en.Bt
TIE MOTT AND BROTHRRsOS CASE.
To 1ls HoS. Henry Z. DAVIS:
Sic: have frequently bear j; remarked that you
were very successful Judge that, except among
lawyers you the most popular Judge az present
on the Bench. could comprehend hoS slch
equivocal eulogy could be properly applicable to tue
Office you fill but brief observation OF your mode OF
exercising its powers has convinced me ths. these
,erms, however inappropriate 70 member OF the
Bench convey the most fitting paneeyric on your Judi
cal courfe. Former Judges have impressed the world
with an idea Of the dignity Of the Bench and the pro-
fuDdity Of the law: il reserved for your Honor
to illustrate their lighter graces 10 popusrze justice
by paisance in dispensing t TO substitute suayly
Of argument for the rgOr Of logic 70 prove 10 the
ltigious the psncy well a. the glorious uncertainty
Of law; and - show the utilities Of legislation. How
ever much lawyer may o'jfct TO such inGovsnons IN
psctit rejoice them and ncined 70 thank yol
f1 your persons and prsci al G.y OF the T's4e2 ae
tbs % bs.e be rs Ss besofi he
ho assists in by :be ssccs Of his Pnon deserves the
public fs,Ude though such 'escrfce be urenseol'
and involuntary
A. one hered elevate you your oe claim
the night to criiicise your Performance y rs dle. hpiay
what In the cse have The shi = exam
Jacob Dott-e decison which IT weis law "old eopsfd
ize the personal freedom Of every citizen In t cae the P~
pv. ehsIsed With having BEEN ACCESSORY a1d.
committed by clerk ia theiI s'a6,hue eht Inr "a m
1c S6ee dS S s"d s p VEN y h, tby soised fom he
officers Of the sDk authority arrest him. and was OILY aer
:h.e days Of yeXatous petascity on the par Of e
police ;his dfauue clerk yielded Of proprety
and consented 70 relieve hauk of lis presence OF
capture him and they know less OF banking
affairs then your liono professional experience bag made o
acquainted with who uppJes that his car'r. would De ~ al
desirable Directory Of the bank The laws Of honor Aai
confdcnGi deaucr 1t the way Of NewYok banks and
u leeoles 70 be more ehpilt qn 'nis PPM VIZ w. s n & ,
since ts you were counsel Tor TINS same bank ior t"Hy Is
before yor election 70 the Bench yon know more OF IL affairs
than DO and ss much a. ITS present counsel ur former par
Relieved from the f~rpesty Of Bro,her.on, prene, the
nited ty him End seized upon .csf whom
we her ,enge;Ice An examination before tar ~ h S 81
the criminal ut AssDst this hsye only - coHpAn
Of fraud On an affidavit before Soprene Colr, Mott
further held 10 b in he suu Of III coo by order o. ,9st
Of bail but with friend. ~iioE 70 CIV bail %
IL the s faie .nSh o int Tine @ nj 5a, I haa iaa he
jail ind deprived Of bis perons liberty AZ me very
wb Indispensable 10 him u prepare means Of defense
ssinst the charges upon which il presnsbe ne WI ,oe
day be- brought 10 trs 5000 bail deemed 'ihceni 70 u
poyed vii COZ sign him TO the State Ir.on Sico b. ia
den.dd the price OF his freedom BY the Officers Of ie oAns
granted by the CONT The dispropoIon seems 70 prove tht
crime sganst The sw and society fourteen tnes lees criminal
In sn,w:rto the charges aesinsi h Mott in MS fiAy
10 iis entire innocence of c1mriciy in he frauds com
med by BIotbouon. and HE isnorauce OF those isnd
merely asking however r rdnci)n in the am lunt 81 BAL
VII to Issee ;beir Whole fortsne. a. .eary for .pPea
time provided he have hs I'on. hoeIy
take necessary measures ef de-nse TINS app e Io'
sorsbe when 10 Tro Of fraud YET sddaceo In Cl ln me
examination before he Recorder MI Arthur testh-d a Al
hs kucw.dge Of Mos all sed fraudulent ;r oht WIN h 70
bank ceiiy'd by inoImslon from other nt fNlL1 ~
ad, tbr5 Ian crk Of Brotber.on Iprves upon
statement, aud positively SD oi hi' owl
snowedre TO be P~yuen, BY him " his ...'sni. o, W
If h. inew a. the Tine lat the payment of these moneys wa
wrong Why did be psy them II he I'D not Know men wa" i
.utsequeut means Of information hsys enlightened him .nd
VII " as
with at lcss srT-sranoe Of snsbe scts ana -
For, a, sid above, thus far no pTog OF anl s H.,
tie absence Of incImiusre testimony me sl4.l' m
,wo in ths"ye a The law 'qy ei'l 100, m H51o
sLd, IN this equally bAtnoed sia'e "i me S - -. bg
Count t1Tesed grant ga'ion OF The eSces I'VE pa
teT OF the bar who J. not council % pa va ~ i, nv
s. that appears charge prc"Ifed Asa-s ~. oy
Bank wi,io ;Iial citizen in default q mp SID PAL y
it uued in The coIuon l for indefinite lenE'h OF ne
longer shorter ss it may s the csPF'e OF Inc
The book. beve contain secedcnt for ash rnsIss
Ole aeei,i9n oG "1 AZ & o or spo5sy Tor your
course e.wherr fsrv &, ubt could exist argue, as 70
ibe cenpici;y OF MOI with Boiherson it !. d'Reed BY 20
made by Mot that be and Broheison were on r'
ct considerable iutimaey ard bad nu.lue' ,I. III ~ ~
paibe tie ausnce which M driendAnt ,y ne hsd
evidence is con pe.tt OF ila' o4-ht 70 Q, ~ ~ ~ ~
mepL There few who have no. sun lent rep" ior
sn6 there Who 60 10. a - '1 70 Believe Al
thir hubsud ie them l. i, quite probable that Broherson
in he haiti q dir.r Ing hi emPye l. . ptohAs.e A.2
that bfore lie sem el.eo4ies VI man % "a
An, belief s husband snot gambler sid
b rest What We-' would such evidence have hal tar
hank d,rned exp.5ic he re desnter instead
o Mott The following the cri authority you deem Il uced
M support OF eNnan Of yoir novel tolEse Of
sctior
"Tbe weN settled that when ne touu s,on l. aid by
prco ci.ut VfIs g. establish th IA, q consruAy -
DO uIaw t.. tweu rT.-s the 49, aut ce Araoc. OF
earh rartes the former object
the original plan, cont.upls ou ot a the
acts deosTSiicu. and therefore oTiEinA
deures sgaust them. Il Green: Ey IL And
TIE auo1 says 'hA any vito ds srer INTO
parSsc design H. v parry 20 every a. vi h 9st before
b. torc BY The others an patty 70 every ~hiea
afterwards e eous ty Any The Others u di;hrran Of such
dessn "
qirrd holiness hnr r~ara such pr@eeint;
wi require ingenuity ilsu think your Holor
~ IL lis irrssvs,cy into spp o your pp,pu.
Tb. Gr.I az hss coUspira
nsl puTOs bglAry a., bg. veo thea II y b thA.
The ~ tNs;ir must be rs. proved l. the
OF Mo-; t1iou B>lk. sotkiHg i proved
TIL facts fihe siu Ply .h-e Thsi prvae esu,
unsupported affidavit of bsuk ofc-r thrown
prr deanlt excessive bail withott .od whog, hope
triAl CHARGE Of rlss- The suA criuils
has ben corui.t-d which i NJ tho<is suffered %
escspe S'h iufgv auG TIE invests a o l@ st Of the
which % show fraud and winch st o. have
been eoi- first ia either made, l.. res l. faly
.1rur,ssd hie the is-e ard wife o DE sb 1niiug DE-
fsner acw.d eliminate b. scayts uled
usA gossip whose ~o- IN b. ~ q tlse,
PERMITTED 70 te received. q w SOl L.
No e. Wes; Thirty seventh street.
Narkets-CRnVLLY RgPoSTfD Fos THs y. TsIsUSE.
FRiDAY. April , lsj2
ASHESThe marie ouir. bota knis Of 70 bo.