The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-07-24
TEN BaIrVss m'LITssY sroasKsEPER



Vsc~te she Ososr " Arrcst.
suPRbMS COURT-sPECIAL TERN
Before Hon Jadse Iugrshsm.
July 23-Jowa,han PEEL her Bri,d.Sc Majestys Prs
ctpal Secretary for hs War Department james Saaos
Ea-It has been already stated In the HksALD tuas the
defendant in tnis case who had bosn military store
keeper at Weldon, England arrested 10 this city
by officer Bowyer civil warrant Issued by this Court.
en- Al cation Of having emDezzed from her Britannia
hsjesty Queen Victoria, tho sum OF e. 22S os. 3D. or
S'0sis So.
The following is the a iAvt on which the order Of al.
rat wa Rrsntsd:--
CITY q .eior at Law deposes and THAT
Re ssSy s:sS o her q ss
srncps sserets Win =, al the sD Ss,Y H Of & ss
cover Al debs due to- or Sey Bsn:ic
= BE sSs = o. ss sSS1
wiz End to the 2ytn day Of May now last pat
% Sssr sss es ns
y. ,sspsl ,s. 1y so,sAsepsr In hs said d-psr,@snt
sucn sa ,er ia The
s.d J.mes sSes 70 the sad . nd
ns to b. .ppsa "a hs OF OF S Sons
sd Dc p.rtr he toe .sia James 5ra E,'. -
drs'is enb.sze ms.pprop's'ea and mssepn-. ..rse
sa O. % e 81 s0 to sS o. a. S Cs s
igtcm q urr, Britain Ire snd-,o vii, In the .mnuu'
hath 'sssss been sai mao nduct neglect,
such biz .is5. .s,a .aS ~ sw.s fraud r. sra'
J.nss Elliott 20 guilty enbez'as sod Gsude I
aud 81 rsadsy csn'sess ssn ass .or.ss
on or seet ss SAG Sry nsa
Amerc. and Is new; seoonsnt q n'ornsd sad baaevet
ko ,toresi, order .hereunon duly issu Sd
said triis nc M'ss'ss o. .sosqaer .s,,e,. toe
a,ceI sueh Greer On the I'm day Of sumo 1853 h. by
ss same hat Ire Sc James sucn sNoit taersin eeso5
% "a late Of weeeeD Aforesaid p,ssip', mt ary store
I'D io'ty t"o ,ruy 'edeo'ed Dor Sad Brtsn
i~ep ,hres Pounds AID hes s.nss for MONIES received
" be- M sa , n nan o ,sou9 Ssys u s
pose IN he psymeit Of vsrious ~ ma doc on nsr sid
goat had ssscsed h,s poneat now. All 70
w. sesrs s,t hub seed ~ attorney sni
seses s tbs sid ceesrr' soo bsh been ana ia lie fee
iSe fresons are msoe ~ ceDoreot 90 bis inr
mtn see; derived from ns ruooss received by him,
ssss solicitor Of the said dspsr eni and froa
s9ess ses OF b. s Brsac Mass,,s SAID Csart Of AZ
ehequer rsses.d bin ih dep 'orni fro ihe said
rhe defendant has bssn bald TO bail in the sum Of
$1,000 ana being unable to procure IT, remains 10 COS
Fhis morning, Ge.srs BiachTord. Seward and Cr,swod
appeared that be OF Arrest be aea, aud
&essrs whtsker aud j. Williams, on the par: or ths
p ANTI, opressd he motion.
Mr. saru Jr., making the molten to discharge tue
defendant ION arrest ssio me parties to this acton
are pop issasn s. the Cart should therefore,
pzc with eat iricoe9s II not severity tho
which the p'amrn preeepss as the foundation Of his
puraon TOT toe order Of arrest dyer Ayres, 81
Smith 100 rbe Plaintiffs entire Ia coatsioed Ia toe
single Affidavit upon which the order OF arrest granted
present any strengthen orig sisvt (Coae Gee
xe5 II insisted tns part Of the defendant that he
affidavit is fatally defective for The reason specified in the
fcIowirg pcnis-
Pom, 1t stirns,ively appears By the sl,avit that
the ds pdsn, not Indebted the p,an,,f aud tn,s
being co. The Court should dsctArss the order
without further irqqEy, eecsose further inquiry would
be irrelevant The srumonc stA'es astinn arising
contract under SUB Of sec i2s Of tee Code The si
oavit states that oeeIdxnt contracted ibe ceb tor
which ths scron ia brought" VINO YES the o,nsr party
" this oontrscr II cioary from the saavit thai
the plaintiff bo such other pzrfy and IL ~ clearly
appears that the Queen of sweat Britain rne
sfidAvt states that the Queen instituted proceed
,s os,v ~, seen 9 vSrs ,Ds
turd r Lonoou the thou residence OF the parties to tns
acton and Of The Queen sna that london jory found
tie defendant under B,tn law, to be justly aud truly
inoeb,ed To her said Bfiispnc hsesy for the SUN of
60 23 OF for money recs'ved by toe said James Elliott
Cor Der raid ssj,s,y a pss" Ths svrrmcut shows u.
Thai The ac!cucs ant 10 indebted TO tue Queen o For
money received Tor her cannot veil Dc that the
def nca1i TIE ne deb TO toe Queen in England
person bere. The accidental APPEARANCE
OF the debtor 10 this couary does DOT operas pr
cba 20 Of creotor and nent legged the
creditor the in bath countries rne deieod
art therefore IA not indebted 10 plsiotH. aat the
plaintiff bad reh this action. Assio the
VI this STATE requires every action 70 DC beoash
In the name o. the tarty In interest The pianiG
has not brought himself within the exceptional cases al!
lowed by TIE statute The Question then, u,
the Queen whyi Because che Is the creditor
n.rause the mercy when recovered VIII belong to her
because the plaintiff shows that vii nos belong 70 hiu
IL plaintiff tho real party In interest follows
that he bso riaht commence this scueo aud no right
srres, the deien can't Again: IL 10 expressly decided
A. bs, an action be mAp,aned Ia the name OF
agent II sovereign Of foreign country that tho sovr
reign Is the real party in interest and must bring the SUIT
Individual in hs own nnne. This decision Is tho
result OF an exhaustrs investigation by M Justice Hon
man Of the Enalisb csses.
Po,bt -fhe Court should take this motion Judicial
notice tho prncice ang 10 wr~ Of
tent The pratce apO-srs 70 be 10 return the inquon
into the court issuirg tho writ enter ava issue
ia 10 the Sheriff Ihe judgns thus Obtained Is by
statute dual deerm,nhaoa OF the rights @! TIE par
ties IN the sctiop tCoco sec 245 me cause Of s-'ion
ny the pausnop veroict srd retrrn In the idogne a.,
and no sustained for money rccsveo by tho
o., Mt and action ID. defendant s not liable 10
arrest (Gooorlcn vs. Durosr, ~ Barb, 6sI.)
Point iifne granting Of en- order OF arrest necessarily
pre- suppcses thai lie Judge has been adicaly nforrcc
o. he fsce alleged to author octer Section ISL Of
prescribss s1s, as TIRE mesus Of 1m nun
o.aOs us information. he adsvn Of the pl.nsns at
prrey DOES single solitary fart IL con.
pohipg SUPP ,ions. IL Re entirely on nforns
and belief ara dOes not sege positively aas sing
fact The sfioav for this u clearly nsufcieat
Campbell Bryan, Is Howard Pr. Rep 6i)
agass: The as, a,iSssnon s hat the deieudAn. ss
su,h public cicer BAN faidul nly eoloezzieo, mssp-
prop lated aud nssppcd &c. This 10 IN tue exact Ian
susgs of sobdy OF section liz, AID crnc'usion
Tne facts and circumstance whence TITS ccacle
oss stated, thai the Court be uiciai
~ ucrmtd that the stnt had right to oraw toe gal
conclusion Tue sscoud charge COS. the descendant n-io
been guilty OF mscot rct and neglect 10 such his ofse
ms likewise CO. rrrion Of law, aud alleged m tue ex
act larrusee OF susdivtson Tue ume the place ana
re circumstance Ia ethsr words the facts Qualifying the
conclusion. ba stated me ihlrd chsres is 'snd
ikewse of hsai contracting the deot tor which this
sciiou brcuFn' TIA ~ IN the lsog.sgc CT subdivision
a. OF lfp ~ the Code. sihort single positive
sGrmsuon o. iscs constituting the alleged ffAuo.
The cN1s, tten, markedly that or zoaoas etof1sJ
svepus bis ieGsi conc nscns. giving no
excuse BY sihdast n verihei oy some per
nay % fsc's stating tia, the grounds Of
hs belief certain Instructions, refrsntpR from CON
mupcsng tnoee Instructions 10 the Court. and scfuou
ousy reffing from ssearing 70 Any belief ~hassvef IN
tho verify sf ipstrucons Al previous adjsdcaiou
establishes the fact thst the liberty OF tue citizen Is ro
10 be Invaded his person subjected 10 Imprisonment
upon such ffevit ~ ths rhis atudicsuon c>tao
rsheeI That sH net sufficient 70 state thu Tbs case