Edgefield advertiser. [volume] (Edgefield, S.C.) 1836-current, 1858-03-31
VOL. xXIIl...NO II.
Rev. E. 4. CHAPLIN on TIE RHVIVALs.
NHw YORK, March 2

ANEN 1OHAj 4uAfCu az.
Rev. E. Fl. Chaplin, in the course Of his sermon
this morning, took occasion to ailude briefly TO
the religious excitement now prevailing 80 ex.
tensively in New York, Philadelphia and Boston.
| The speakers opinion of the excitement was, on
the whole, against any actual good resulting
therefron inasmnch as conversions, under such
influences, were apt to I've short lived. He did
not believe it possible that sinner could bs
changed to saint by sudden shock religion
was something to be acquired by daily prayer; !;
| by holding close communion with God by ae-
| knowledging him in all the forms of nature; in
| the hours of sorrow as well ed the hours Of Joy;
by administering to the necessities of the poor
and so BY letting our light shine before men that
others seeing our good works might glorify our
Father which * in Heaven. The truly religious
man lived his religion-practiced it in his daily
walks-in the family circe-in the marts Of
business and wherever he might be placed:
There was no excitement about such mau-.
his life flowed gently as riyer-and his end
was peace.
The eloquent speaker, however, would not be
understood as ridiculing the present religious
movement. 1t had his best wishes that good
might result from it. It would, at any rate, he
said, draw the attention of many to the subject,
and to the great fact thnt they possessed ali mmor
tai soul. At the present day there were very few
that ever thought anything about the deathless
spirit within them, and if the movement now in
progress was successful in nothing more than
awakening those in the paths Of sin to sense
Of their condition, it would not have heeu in vain
THE REMOVAL or JUDGE LoElNG.-The House
Of Representatives yesterday did its part Of An in.
famous deed 1t voted to address the Governor
fnr his removal! Why should Judge Loring be
removed from his Officer Has he committed. any
crme3 Has he been guilty Of any malfeasance in
office? Let republican, Mr.. s pooner, answer:
lie said iu the debate that Judge Loring could not
be impeaehsd, for he CHAD COMMITTED NO
Why, then, should Judge Loring be reuoved2
1t is because Of the howl Of squad of anst-
les and traitors? Do such men as Garrison and
Phillips represent the voice Of this Common.
wealth. Are not these men deadly hostile to
our Constitution And is it not the height Of
presumption to term their opinion the public sen.
timent Of this State? Yet the majority in the
House have bowed their necks to this infamous
dictatorship, and covered themselves with indeli.
BILE dishonor. Shame, where is thy blush
The only offence Judge Loring has commit.
ted is that OF having executed laT of Con-
gress This the ground of hatred Of abolitionism:
he executed the fugitive slave law! Now these
fanatics hold this doctrine that, constitution OF
no constitution-law or NO lsw-nu fugitive slaYa
shall be again taken from this. State; aud ma.
jorty of the House, in voting his address for 10.
moyal, assume this ground. In thus doing, this
majority ore traitsrous to the State and TO the
Union and each one of this majority deserves
to he held up before the community ~ an enemy
to the constitution If his country.
Here is a tryapny as great as ever was seen
under on oeerseers lash! Men stand up in the
House, avow that Judge Loring is unimpescha.
BILE as to character, ability aud efficiency; has
violated no law committed no offence done no
malfeasance in Office, and yet they rote to re-
move him from Office!
If there he any public fsith left in the hearts Of
this people, they Will cover with shame and Gun.
fusion the fanatics and demsgogues who thus
dare to sully the escutcheon Of the old Bay State.
Boston Post.