New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-03-15

came no some weeks ago, be now ieasseT.ed lS-e
proceedings of Dec. g He did r9t gay tb1 the dis
die naon}e was discussed but DID say on the occasion
referred to- that the impression vas conveyed 10 HE
mind that the intention OF the Toomos Dill was 70 bring
Kansas into the Union by one popular VOTE that
heirg The vote for deleg ates for Convention. Mr.
Bigler again referred to his integrity, saying that he
renre sen,ed proud and noble people lie reiterated
the statement that the impression 1911 OF MS mind was
Iss,tbnt Kansas was be brought IN with one vote
ard that The Constitution was not to be submitted to
tie people. mr.. ..,ua ,.o s.r...-
40, ,rete sueech on Kansas last Summer advoc ating
the submission of the Constitution to the people.
Mr. BICLER-That is very pertinent. have not
been in the habit OF making speeches on Kansas
Once did address the people On Kansas when ssid
bs Constitution should be submitted to vo e, but
"a M cue .ton in view except that OF Slavery.
Mr. FREDERICK (Cal.l moved that Mr.. DOugss
be cent for. or that the Senate adjourn the further
membertd very well the circumstances when this mat
Ter came ND before The Senator from Pennsy lvanis
then said that he did not have very distinct rec,l
TO bad taken place, when the Senator from Illinois
distinctly denied IT,
Mr. BiCLER-He did not.
nv BRODERICK-My impression, Sir.
Mr. BIGLER-Your imprt ssions are wrong Sir
He was careful aud guarded in the statements he
made The Senator from California seeks to place
this matter in a false view before the Senate.
Mr.. BRODERICK-My memory must be very
IL
rect He hoped the Senate would adjourn. When
the Senator from Illinois is in his place, we shall know
whether the Senator from Pennsylvania Is correct or
not. My impression is that he did deny 1t. lie
thought from the tremor that the Senator (Bigler
hibited when he that he was about to take back
all he said.
Mr. PUGH tOhic) thought he could relieve the
Senator from Pennsy vania of some Of his embarass
ment BY stating that when the matter fret came up
he as the friend of both the gentlemen from Pennsyl-
vana and Illinois bad brought them together and his
mpro saion that Mr.. Bger was correct, and that
the conversation alluded to transpred IN another part
OF tie room where the Senator from Illinois DID not
hear il.
Mr.. BIGLER-What the Senator from Ohio says is
perfectly correct 1t may be remembered that he
Bigler distinctly stated on former occasion that he
cid not know whether the Senator from Illinois par
tCipated in the discussion. For tha rest, 1t did not
become the Senator from California 10 describe the
manner referring to biz, Mr. Biglers, tremor) IN
which he made the explanation.
Mr. FREDERICK owed it to the Senate and to the
Senator from Illinois to state that some days since,
when it was understood that the Senator from New
Hampshire intended to alude to this matter the Sem
ator from Illinois intimated he would denounce the
statement on this floor fasehood, II the Senator
did not qualify 1t.
Mr. BiGLER-Nothirg Of the kind is on record.
Tie Senator from Illinois said no such thing.
Mr.. BRODERICK-So this is a question OF We
The VICE PRESIDENT reminded the Senator'S to
keep within the legitimate limits of debate
Mr. BIGLER-1he Senator from Illinois never said
anv such thing. He is not a man who would do 50.
Dercupce what, Sir, as falsehood the impression
on my mind that Kansas was to be admitted without
popular votel
MI. BRODERICK-The Senator from Illinois is
sick in bed If ever he takes his seat again the Sena
tor tBiglerl viii be replied to.
Mr. Frederick then moved to take up the
private BILL but motion prevailed to ADJOURN I'LL
Monday.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.