New-York daily tribune., 1858-10-06


+ ara tie Mediitrrauean. Her owners Mc-srs. Buckn
aud Crane a. ili- city. with : g.. arnold, and y. IL.
Tn has of Providence, Sold the HCider on the lSh
I II February 49, 10 >,rorH Gcor-'a Be AbrGnches;
il = supI~ >.i However. tAat her husband the
nal owIsr. The Haidee sailed under this register
uliil Dee. ID, III, wheb she was transferred TO
Eniuo >aIchez 4 D,.z a., th!s ci'y hy whom she vas
cleared jar : iS.S fr Gibraltar and market. Her
cap.ain was :. G.. Whitney. The following Is list
q her cargo wien She sailed f.om ll,s port:
s. barrels o. Rum. cs.es C'Hi'' Ilota-
30 30 B-,g LOo boz Fogr ,or C,ds sad
50 ba-s roblruo. Ahssse.
Tie t,tsl value of this cargo was sl6,Sil
Tie Haidce received this cargo at Pier No. g East
River s.rg head into the clip. At the head OF the pier
lay tie brg Ellen. but short tine before se1ea as
er cargo uf shouks and lumber was a, the
sane time beirg discharged upon he dock Inc nature
Ot these shipments boerdthe llnidee, and Ihe pro
pin qulty o tie s.avebr.s with her shocks ana lun-
Der, naturally suggested tia, the Hadee herself was
tliirg fer Save voyage. 4 person WHO WAS cogni-
zant 81 these facts mincated his suspicious 20 the
United States agAur.:es. but no notice was taken oi
the after IL a short time she eff the port between
two days" ard within the space of few months she
Lac taken Eu, hundred r.ayes trom the coast o
Asica, landed them IN Cuba Sad lies scutt.ed ut
the cut ED OF Long leland.
H,v,s., Wednesday, Sept. - 1883.
Gen. Cotchas admIr,rs iave found themselves
quite ;uzzeo IL exp ain the apathy displayed Ia tne
discharge Ul his public fsnciUn'. exhibited lately
il the landing OF 9t3 slaves FROM the American ship
iiaidee OF NcH.foTk, in the very Bay OF Csrdenas
without tie slshts show of resistance from tie su
tbori,ics. The vessel Al cargo owned by Luneis
tie great Cuban saye-tIe1er. NoIe ot tine negroes
were captured any mo.ested engaged IN Their
hnorg. Suce Z a. safe delivery of the unortunatcs
t. masters IT has been ruaurcd that Iulueta aud
Others wodiu he arrested but am lec'lued 10 thiuk
that tuicha has been either grossly deceived 10y his
s0y~ers or has ,ugt it to abstain from arrestng
man who Las former occasions proved himself sui-
ci,utly owerui and opuIent at Court TO overthrow
a Captain Geuera. Several others ARE pointed ont
as palt CyLers u the cargo, seyeraiW whom hoh hieh
., siii in the Cove rnnent but this may be merely
ru.e of tie slave-,raders, to insure protection IN
their uLhoiy expeditions.
In the iean tiu,e the trade appears to thrive
rnug holt the island ard port Is still the tayore
la,e tor fitting out there being fewer than three
rig gacro 10 thut op. raoithe brg CIinea, schooner
ELi.rirlse and bark Arienas-ncnc Ut which, II "a 10
be hoped Will bc allowed 10 leave here, at least uuth
cur rev Consul auvrs, who will certainly oring cut
uur special distractions about such cHses. Hardly a
dny passes viii out our receiving repurts Of landings
O cHTgoe, IL dreIt parts of the ls!and, aot strange
To sHy they all uinediately sold with their cedu
/ ltis ogued by the Government Officials. Still, We
uusj believe that they hottest men, and that the
ents have been spurously ISSUED by the dealers
thtuselvs iour readers may rec' beet tha the same
ecnudavur to place about ts time last year
wien the port If Havana was selected as the most
appropriate spot FOR carrying the trade, though this
puy uep.nc maIiy upon C'nch8s abseoce at Marlano,
| where be may be considered as retired from oilce as
lar ss suct things so.
SUPREME COURT = GEsrsM TrSS.-ocr 2-Beios'
| Judge SUTHERLAND
| IMPORTANT DECISION AFFECTING PROPERTY of THE
John wsviek appellant AIT The Mayor and Aldermen of the
CIy # New-iork rr,PondenLs
The following was rendered by Judge sutherland on
! Satrrdly:
Tie complaint in this action appears TO be sort of
n for biz d@ dyd al benefit ne then sor. os
the brl ut OF all III. payers of the City of New-York
bounded On street City New York be is entitled
aant in Tee from the Copoon Of the ct, Of New Sois 81
ssit To hu individually to be made. bat II he is
sg . IN s 70 sun ~, Ea .S sn a., & sid land
ud water rhch had made by she Corporation
sns be- d.eIsrsd ,"d maxim. James Thsysr aud G
s.ory present claimants and pstes in interest under the
Aow the defendants deur to this seesaw, swinging com.
siut which leave. The sud finally uppenosi 70 depend
upon the 'ud the Judicial t put upon on h srd lmons
ersl hat cou'sis Two causes of action "hcare improper
Wh,br according critical s,ays. Of Code definitions.
there dtno csuses Of on or not, should have
~,rr dae4, asscd different
Mt to h. g. u,paiId o 10 be asked Tor
ton Tor raina. iudigid, sh;s, PROPRIETOR stated
n. lis onpain Inconsistent With the rights Of the tax
n The Corporti ,hn hre i. po need Of o.elsdas
srst Dur void sud The taxpayers baVe Not been in'
jur,d or d.rsuoeo BY that graut
The Plaintiff peeHd. in hi, complaint ,hs, there i
an of aOn; does not pretend that there
n.dy but h. IN ioubt Ehether he alone la, been
~rued or all The tax isser' Of Nswforsi ne goes IN 'r
iiD-, udis dusy fret aud. h. shoud fail then in spirit Of
! sn.arg,d b,trvoiet-r Fl thu taN aNpayers generally.
- 1T -, e am. 80 ,1rr. on, one i. rennjr,J
only b. granted Which Is tho qus.ti,n for the
TLr ,heoy Of the complaint not therefore that there
/ two aus Of action.
Bu, caL the ,s.u,f IN ID. complaint thus preseu
bic individual pnngs Tor Judicial rehst aDd then the
Of tle pnbr although relating the subci
ter; efpees ywhen, If IN. plaintiff right ia his view Of his
sts snd ugs The public have 10 ngAisand nave 'df
Ttnk not. think the Code doe. authorize il tac4c-
coIc srt of Peanug slerns FOR he judgment q tue Court
suting dnert pbas" 9 Tie same at ~ acts ot Of eee
at. atIg 20 he subject matter au dierert
th acts ase'' different parties in tho
BY Code Ilaiua isc, which constitute
b. ie la lD.n which may b. united
aa b" choos.' 10 te nr 81 action olt the Code doe uo'
GtLorz, .hs omnibus sr; % comant-'toppng a.
~ Cod, tie iu,, r1ly in h complaint prrsen, tho
facts Lch constitute hS or hs hss more than
wl any be united but be- erntHt with tle Court
bv tr,n. m his and tls ~ hm,e aud others.
Tie Code nay cover nmtace oi SUI 6u u IS u % char
liable permit f crop hs AID Up
wou have BEEN ny vs. upon ;he question Of pesd
iag ni.,d by fns ground OF the dcmuru IN hi,
have not oosd rto the decisions upon ,hs analogous
qr, hooks. for th po, 'assd by
the ol {. y : koostye Draper and o'hsr' the
ss Msy Grnera Term IN the hst Judicial District 10 tat
held that payer such merely, has
Interest him u maintain an ston in behalf Of
Lins. snd all other payers of th City, % GEod ded
giant vhSh has been actually erecrisd By the Copoyetn
yEcu ground Of fraud, % Authority irrcglrty
Nnh % decision all, all that pert the plaintiff
plant TAXI erey lorfh The rights and
Oi lhr az ihf4r i lhr AI nt cls!t
q u ". zfsnt 20 Dufe, Sc should b. declared vo
Aeconi ~ this drsion the Plaintiffs complaint does not
show q - De- Of ton proprietor Of the
o on desc IN the complaint be Untitled
an n tie land under water adj 3ng from IA. Cooperation
City and % ttr grounds 81 demurrer bez ,La the
crI at does -,irirn. constitute Of
sctl th' only remaining question rased By ne demurrer IL
vhst tn ~ facts stated, be plaintiff n entitled ldg
n, Pc tla. the -fporl,on Kecnis such grant 20 aim
IL n tlr ia poftht question In this and shought
Tsaf'L IL mot of difficulty, aud much learning
tLd logic exhausted the Argument ii H. yet turn, oat
rpcn nliIa,on, ituk 20 be- exceediI1y simple, re-
euf oy careful The facts and close scrutiny
Il he natlre character r preeIse right clned by
:L Isll 10 aud OF l, for