New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-09-21
nEIa.lRT. Lirf,S ANNA MD WESTERN RAIL
ROAD COMPANY.
uP,y TO rHs "-asOT % Sr.sRs. Eosfsr. asosS ''D
orH.ss.

sr-cr rsPs over n. ,.s.a;e- o. ( r. Roor; and
i,le C.rl "a o.ly bs.u ,aos ~ho have reli
- -, "a 49, - - =. -, .r,s -
r..-d without; rot-, b-f - . s1rh fang T. - FRI ffr'
~, ..,s g, y ~ .. r. f.,-d. - ~ n wI
b lac = thor shy eNpos.L
r-..,s,,n.u,. ant ..c- 20 uy--i vel a. .; ere
psb..r. d,Hsni. a INF rNro,.i o. . - erT.f-
r. '' I.sas s i . ,- - re va Sf rS ~ l l-@si &
y rom W1rr,u COsry udks is ei'els eo~e'e lEa ha'
B,whv al ,hi. sr-ay Of Signature. Nv prn ieer
Addressed % r. Roo,T ionella 2-y ~, ',iaee wa
,-.re6 Th.y have -sr,, appeared in any q ray CON-
.,..nd r (, M. ,rs,ors hsr,,osre s,-u they ueyor
VII WIZ d. hsv voluntarily TIN up 1xain hi'e they uo
become I'll r~Ety lo,0o1, b. '.lzs tlA' nia-' r-it
t'T Hsd 10, h. ard VI Brow Sufficient ,reusrh rd
65,uee IN bc., 20 oouteud With the simple 'h IN ny
f.sb hand. rhe oi habit z con'rrsry OF ooEoil
lion II sou please which brought hem a. together ein ~
hr desire % divide and ai.,5hac tLr u y
these risTeVre.er'si1rs Ihrn "'y nol a. ~ ''
fifteen couieaers'' They would not have ee . |
Wt.;sv.T motive I'D 70 il n. combination goes fr %
| sustain M theory q u. fe-!iI ~. pu,1l. - ., o., ~
tous under dr. sslon an 'At no 20 - ',5orsirs
o'h.r i,.s .sh - t. o. AID ir.srtv Wsa have
-. .bI II 80 .b@y -.nno, b. 1p.s, = weakened BY
@ 20. alteration, Why his continued ixncriu. and evasion
the QUESTIONS i.'ae iay accused parry IAN 40 tA sa
;hs guilty always To- most prone % ie-oi' iAs-
course. WY rrte. ss deny ny cA4is' sieSo.
Nh,, M Brovs ror VI, Robert upon the, aah. ,-p iesy
one ace isurorfaat grgatcs made b. against re CoT'
me Ofser ,mTaei pl,hL vii bod myself ready 10
On. Nd In -esard 10 rh,.r ui,rifed iusnlaons dA
20: cal thu ger'-neus private character IN question % he
contrary, stated hat "a. pr1c pay D., ~. % a'I
Robert and Browns hlsh position and character that D am
ite necessary for NE 70 expose theif sIra errors ana
~ Bro~n AID Rober, have both known wei or
u.uv year. They vii neither 81 them d4r- Ft ,a'e in
s.nns,5ns INFO the tangible form OF asertoHi will
~i,he1 Of ;he5eius as they have ndi'err.y sNpc,'ed
hud their bibles ana 'hai they be,re he~ Nominations
Their conscience. will yet condemn them r resort such
Another most ex,raordiuary frr document containing
~ many .hood. i the fact -ha The signatures sre all m te
hsndwritns parties aud. II an not greatly mistaken,
br- Of them "a, "ueu Jy eher Vi iAe pafe' whose
in me writing the imputed Managers 'he same party
coupod the mot Of that be .lbmited 20 t COMMITTEE
by ne Asergostd over long BY tAem ald then made
Th +. Of no cou.plrnce Of course have doub, I.
authorized .isu for In sny 1ho who .'En report
IN blank and aye ne city would not b" very particular about
signing not signing false statement 90 BE- printed IN your
! paper sheF, much j. a. stake.
vii nov briefly notice some Of their mi..iaemer,s have
the officer. 4 the Della
ware Lacsswauns and Western Railroad Company in
general and the gentlemen know perfectly nave seven
times exposed aud disproyed that aeHent II 10 not tue
that thor, patient hearing Of what bat - say that
majority the Board Of Aauaser free from
sure" That happy state Of confidence sud good feeling
Of the iuyes,sstiuE Committee that mistake Ia. bc y
exposed Review But viii pa. the remaining erro1
Of importance and resolution quoted bv the
gentlemen ard What they ay concerning 10. adoption. This
the same resolution COPY Of which have twice aiuy gh
TO ob,sns H. osce Of the Company and tie
The resolution and preamble quoted the Card are no,
the as t.s' adopted at the meeting Neither s uneuy,be
II offered verbally, under great excitement na.s-d In he
midst Of tgmul' aud 10, written down ne The orig
NAL was sufficiently offensive, and equally of s
ence 70 me was In ,he prtce o n i b M ~ s Isa
d. Phelps On this pou, speak ad,ediy Thu difference
is tle importance except indie the spirit which
'roed the authors Of the Gard" hen the peculiar rea.
tons OF the author Of tns resolution 20 one u the imputed
AID his su-eryiency Of character known and
cred no, 90 much wonder wal D. ir the ranaction But
il absolute unqualified say that
passed JuH meeting OF the sockhoder" Their number
be- but little, II any short Of four hundred wherea.
the arset estimate which have received Of number pres
snt at the meeting referred TO was g say thirty aud
Beside. candid and homes. to say that the resolution
adopted HHdn~ousiy Il i doubtful the negative form
the question submitted al sy ", aud No II
rain mt theIe was much excitement and equally eertsn
thousand shares Of stock were represented at that meeting
reason ihst the parties were too much disguised with the
also know positively from written documents nv
possession received since the publication OF the Card
more will venture the assertion that the signature
approving that resolutions snd IL can be obtained, will
qs 20 even f m yGh S 10 not b ss oGs
I P VII M, AP5ri' .e5 approval Of that reso
few words 20 explain the theory Of such II proba.
h not generally known that nearly oil the Old khoer aud
qte number Of The have the conflicting Interest,",
other conglou- aud dependent enterprises possessed by
the Mnassrs complained Of though not in 'h dpropoi
ton While have complained Of th. ate Of interest in
the soc holder nderd, II cannot b. avoided in
explanation Of the apparent majority the late stock
with the affairs Of the o1psny that
they decline 10 attend ~ all Further some u these khod
situated in their bushes. relations with the imputed
parties that would not b. safe for them speak their
tments openly They might be Pu 20 inconvenience ia their
bank htir bankers sccOunt mzt lose some freshn.
ba'nes ~ their transactions ia bills 4 hange
tantr bn.ine'. Eh BE- seriously enbsrra..ed bit they FEEL
hone the r indignant because their vote and c2post6u
Beside h, pars heretofore exposed by me- aud their re,
IN al .i = ,i ~ ~ % 80 ,l,s, sIs Nty hnmgr-
not believe here were ia present a. the late uiec z-ndeed
cannot Ie''i,et ~ iouf
srne. Mer. Robert Brown. sa~ras,. a. Wi a. of
tie grounds they have corgra-ae tn.rv.s rr The an
ou- eAh 1tid 90 ile .l-f Of oc khofpr4
ha s,cia. Mrr Blown Robert tifna,e 'hr d,r ~ !,
2rniy to the precedent ,hey have given e referring ther
chandler as protesting Christian aud suggesting that WHOM
lsy ~ ' thtf flo, i. mediation they th.ir
acarcfll study Of thar ,ezt viii mako rs al better.
On, word 20 YOU Mr. Editor en- reference o. the Invitation
u Pie oef- 10 attend a the ohce q the Company go .ec
bit most esr' 4, unite in he iai,ai .o VII ~ 70 ,er
with 20 examine .gch document, end evidence may
'hs produce aud esl for 4ld hereby pledge myself upon
49, - I'll P a. ~ ~, ~, paper a.
parties which .ubs'suly sustained by lch documents
al teuce, and you shall plbl,h -lch e'lb.hed
Frher help your lgest.e.ion. and oF other u here
m renew ny oaerof 500 go BE- given any benevolent in
slton 20 b. d-4ted by yorl f,r those boas c1ununica
tons from n Board Of Managers the luves.isang Commit
gee a. WI became ne ba, Of the Committees report
ilJ se- iot ia ilt History, aud To- NY alton
u y9or paleF u te 7th inst acopy q which always
Having o;eu volunteered defend ~ poioa.wheaeyer
d where ser Or "ppflrity should De- gwen compel
ssv or dosud viii rLer.foe r.- b. t. iof ths Won vii A..
c,rt The int II Me-, Rob~-- srs Bre .rJ ~
I'D n aud thu have al this icuy 1perly adjusted
wealth and b eresf,{ aJed|yat,ad ION T
b run sAd equity ar al my eide, sud justice sill We
To.e who reoect the results IN the es. Of Sir Dean Paul