Quasqueton guardian. (Quasqueton, Buchanan County, Iowa) 1856-1858, 1858-04-22


~- The following list Of cases dis.
posed of at the March Term of the Dis
trlct Court in this county, was sent us
in proper season by our Independence
correspondent, but, with other matters,
has been delayed. Being of interest,
however, We give it, even at this late date
;. State VS.. John Garrison-selling liquor; yer.
dict, not guilty. Lathrop for the State Lee
Leavitt and Moore for Defendant.
State vs.. Thomas King--indictment for as.
sault with intent to kill verdict, guilty of com
mon assault. Head and Lathrop for State, Pres
ton and Adams for defence.
Isaac G. Freeman VS.. John Daniels-appeal
dismissed at Plaintiff s costs. Lee for plaintiff
Adams for Defendant.
]. B. Thomas VS. j. Frye Sullivan-continued
till next term Adams fer plaintiff, Hart and
Lee for defendant
w. Hart, Esq. dismissed at plaintiff s costs
Adams for plaintiff, Lee for Defendant
Thos. Men ulty VS.. L. Keyes-replevin: yer.
diet for defendant $500. Adams for plaintiff
Lee for defendant.
d. ..
Adams for Plaintiff, Lee for Defendant
r. w. Wright VS.. Jed Lake and d. S. Lee
continued at plaintiff g costs. Adams for pit
Lee for defendants.
M. X. Treat VS.. May d Hathaway-note and
acc Iunt Tor liquors sold Judgment for defen-
dant So %. Lee for plaintiff, Jamison for de-
fence.
Older, Lee & Co. vs. Hathaway d. May-note;
judgment for plaintiffs $235. Same attornies
Frederick linn VS.. A H. Hyde, ct. al.-con-
tinued at defendants costs. Leavitt for plain.
tiff. Lee and Moore for defendant
G. A. Taylor VS.. VIM. Rowan-appeal con-
tinued at defendants costs. Head for plaintiff.
no counsel for defence.
Frank Sutton VS.. VIM. Martin, sheriff-reple.
vim; judgment for plaintiff for costs. Jamison
for plaintiff, Lathrop for defendant.
Jos. A. Potterf VS.. John S. Boyd-continued
for settlement. Lathrop for plaintiff, Preston
for defendant
s. s. Allenvs. Geo. b. Parsons-iudement for
plaintiff. Adams for plaintiff, Lee for defend
ant.
Heman Morse VS.. E. W. Purdy-appeal : con.
tinued at defendants costs Adams for plain.
tiff, Lee for defendant.
+. w. DeBerard VS.. Geo. Moxham-attach
ment; settled. Leavtt for plaintiff, Lathrop
for defendant.
JAS. j. Duval VS.. David Lizcr-repleyin: iuds
ment for plaintiff. Lee for plaintiff, Adams and
Preston for defence
G. F. Leavitt vs.. Jas. Mnton-note contin-
ued at defendants costs. Leavitt for plaintiff.
Lathrop for defendant.
Samuel Belding vs. JUDE Day--claim for work
and labor done +; dismissed. Donnan for plain
tiff, Lathrop for defendant.
f. W. Hastings VS.. S. w. Hardin-account !;
continued at plaintiff costs. Leavitt 4 Moore
for plaintiff, Preston and Lathrop for defence.
S. w. Hardin VS.. Alexander Smith ct all
tax-title default referred to L. W. Hart, conf
missioner. Lathrop for plaintiff
George Sauerbre vs. Roswell Bacon ct al
taX-title default referred rs above. Lathrop
for plaintiff.
/ The following indictments were presented by
the Grand Jury:
State vs.. Absalom Hoffman-Perirv.
State VS.. Allshouse ct al-Larceny, two in
dictments.
State VS.. Brooks d Misunderstanding by
false pretence mol. pros. entered by District
Attorney.
State VS.. Hiram Ellison-Adultcrv.
o. H. P. Roszell c. A. L. Roszell j NJ.
Kelley, Jed Lake and w S. Marshall were ad-
mitted to practice in the District Court