New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-06-04

ctcu;i OF tenn; | nay have MADE thsi examination
ft blanks for d,,ss suppsd sna s,tSe
prrsred in the uAnosr have stated think probable that
py fd to ar Be. psp M the 81 p "r Of having
then l.esd WITH the exception Of certain c,rie,
the eIsSPor Of the ps.sph question. which regarded
mi se mean The l' P.FssIaPh the ooe in i.cs sfo.
uo ssse In the s.w.r rut b. eiec, error to bond sud
Of the b. clerical and should
b. REJECTED without being able 10 70 the language Of the
cr.n. witch an no, swEs hss ben Pr-~rvei
sHoud ,liik thu; the snssrr down 10 the s.s pvs
n,Ph go :, tn ~ r1iaps "A sct TsSasni,.
them tbitk saw Nj B.ter some hre- days Ater bin
been received Til two three days ses intsrviev
he ee~; to the precise date day upon
~b the pteps,ed but presume on the day
Upor which PrPos - Be sworn think MI Baker sh.n
that ny imps s-iou is tina, the explanation given
that toe order l,ug twenty days time TO sn'~-r was not
.eryd on dsy upon whcs granted but three
efy, after which ENLARGED z time for s-rvc- b.
skeu IN That impreon the twenty days durns o the de-
c.ns had the pahce OF the Court underestimate
suffered to esps sld to my
s,rpe Dohrg dcIeto put in An smendcd sn'wer; the
,s1ed n, OF he rceSruce which refused
s ny .cpnes,,Sn ~s Ms ;, NM =. Tn 70, M,
s,te OF great nervous debility produced f.r Sc could
. SSeh Ssa been ifosn ia, Ii. Ssns. I'D .elou. sp
piheusi that time. anil he business 'ghcr
wSu5 ptrty 1--WE WY be mi nsed .ous fear, Of that lind
Himself; sef the fcsi o reference which hiak
tine on account Mr. Bsks ha!:t after .econd
appointment had 20 90 out Of the y 20 v'it my
t..k Mr. Jwish, aud it to Mt Bakers
tee taI M Bs.er mi.ht @im.c present. it II he thought
hot w thef Tbs, litter received by Mr. D~se'
be- % y. e,; .nd ,Is. in n. p 2 sac Of Mr. B..
.r health cid ihink b. abe to eondnct with
ou Nj D~isst assistance snd ied that he give hi.
p~ons s...isncs 10 mattel thiak ,usse.,ed
OTIS wi,tess whom thought 70 be imp stsn think the
o the note ded, thai night be showa Nh
B,irn Mr Dwht chos- the meeting had r-tirued
70 tie city END found Mr. st osh,on vel a. Mr. B.set
otter. ana not at tia. meeting; thnk prepared
The tsd be- Transferred n Mr. s,ousdsons OSce
further part in The litigation revrr cousef. my self
i up e,1eacy acted short time counsel 70
pr6,,c ~hsy, isbis Mr. Dwight had n the matter ser Mr.
with him HE office and sisted nearly AL
beI the substance OF the interview thai occurred at n.
s NE paragraph b. kept cut of the ente.y in-
steri,l SID | think he ssr.ed with me; the reason
va, understood that 1t had awakened 'eu,,bd.y
be T {, 'S1 to Nam nv On sSS pa ia ss
espe, the hcg o the referred to think
ds, fling the ulder the notice which hal
giveI Mr. BsksriE Nss,l street and spo.c & hica
ptn the Gi the ttnk ,od him he hal
bitter serd to Drtche County that dsy snd have
he thns be sail hs abs 70, aud d. act
but msng the answer think ioii hn' that
tbs, might get no the clerks office that Gay sad
tia be lad better end he coud my impression
'h Fl bis c. had called At my office gu the morn
ia Of the Day AID that bad said TO him MI Baker hal
b,ei sci up. hmslf with the sa'"er sup
sd the file to the time when this proceeding
Wn 5. eros. 1suined by Mr.. Hall counsel for
Sr Dwight in sny OF his railroad suits becsl'e relations
s.ie with OF hi, creditors that avoided them pre-
viots Boxer ceiling with refefence to the SUIT lad
hot the lae N Spencer fraudulent; h'a1h th
def udsnts had M light to csm IN case the msise os
pad should be- ub, ut-d for tao psntf In regard
tue other scuiie' one OF which wn al assignment oil tine
John Baker recalled for the deferse-At tie time to
which reference made system .eronsiy Inn
10, ed eud cs from tn mist darkness ia
viii my mind then such msr desire 20 civ, ia
sht after fh pnt IN TIL, acln served uP han
wa that he had bou deie ard h fr 'he 'ason that
M other psIties whom hs relied for bis Ia
formation abs-t and distant vas necessary thst o"
.houd hsse day harmed om tim AID conceived The iat %
Re rat there great many papers aud Ocunout'
M op Of those b5ok were asen % Illinois. a, m.
c.rurd long b.fore the OF this s there
obes cks0 here by order Of the Sol!t these rea' u.s.
al me- ' 1 PcT wa v s a % ia haiyas
;t forward and thk that there wa' scAcey
ID 8 foreclosure suit; found the action was laid In
tie lid Judica Dstc. aud 1 frequ-nty ordes-i to
IN "a u Rcbn u d aud think other Counties to Attend 81 this
suit; TO sutnd those o,ders sn moioL' tS.niae and
to ts may cthrr th,fr Mr Dws tqi pres.
,Lut ny tacle, gave way my impression no. !. ia,
Nh Dwight did Dot want that p'rspb already added to Pn. ia
he had and have now various reasons ot TIL lsns 90
toLno paper after t,lo better, as IL over
isul TIN sud ,co' con OF inst papefs now and vs.,
tt,6t m that II spks Of c-rtsn par N ne answer
IDs TO- eo % ot .wr. to h,o @ msae no
Of the letter that time The papers were IN MI pssh
n
usk second you had 'ei' ou that ofro.t'e psrI
Ar Dpigh the formation Of the bsiH. vas pre-
rtI,j: doEI believe in my office when NE answer ws'
Wre. crcexanined BY Mr. Hail. thick In March, 1856
when bscsme assignee for ar Dwight was IN pretty s.od
his ,sit think Mr. Dwight in dhege street Jail "aen
icI ccpy q the Barry mortgage hen drew the answer.
rut ea Lot sett do not know who comp SEED the p'r,oh
20
cu...d in jail by counsel who were there seeing their
1.,lt, sd who sLew Mr Dwight don't think had MN
Br-wrs; tbeie several drafs OF answers sent to r
su.v,r .tsd Mr. Dwight pr y frequently that is from the
inc Of the service of the complaint until eesd ny conne;sn
rh be have doub. that anything stated oy NE Ia AMI
dsyit. The time believe there vas eomuii''i'n
,u,o eAsnne NJ Hamilton SPRINGER Mr. stonsh'on stated
thai al order for 'ucn rHu'on vas nsds Dt was urtf T
POI at ,be time the foreclosure complaint wa. made had
TO { it Alleged rat tho Spencer ease ~s fraudulent
h. ". StougttCD, COUNSEL for Nh Dwight, then
made the following ststment in writing which was
Iut il evidence:
About tie tin was employed by Mr. Dwight stated BY
Nr B,s r. the f'tclosufe brought BY tie Browns
much Io with engagements AID hence wa,
10 nee. Tim esy AID 90 oten as it w.s Necessary for
tie lurtos. Investigating the and preparing The detene
OLe OF the earliest subjects brought 10 my notice was tne .u
ysA g' nd e
had beec prepared be SAID sDd sworn 70 III
bic defense fully in all respects be- desired He
moreover what then knew, that Mr. Baker had not
previously been in such state Of mind :. % en.es
tim praI.ry perform bis duties the In the course OF
concerning AID very soon after was
employed that portion Of the answer referred u IS ~ tles w
aGted to thai in ny opinion was wholly nnste
srd sh bsye been sed part OF any pleading
10 MN should leave ut O any amended answer might
Nh Dwight ssted that he had never BEEN quite sa'
he'd wh that and had objected 70 when presented
ton M Baker informed him that this portion Of the snswe
was tue sud this quite evident from t'e fct
Of ito tsn1g and that toe srgsiions In tna' paragraph
were Ia tho legal conclusions from TIE ists
Hr Baker insisted that the answer ought 70 De
that 10 70 verify tnen - me ue
10 snsw.r vas pIiDg Ths- statements % M Dwight
Wei. no, made 10 lie WITH tar ss knew OF
had heard c.ns.quencs OF susses'ijn inst ns Pf9u
Of ID. answer untrue bat in consequence of h own ais
sat .action With forming part Of p,sdns WIN M
tut1d 20 come extent unworthy motives 10 tns D'"~I'
Mr. wa, vice this segon should orIn no pE OF the
gwen by r,ss Of soy ndus,ion thst 1t was ss pay