The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-03-04


yEAs,
Bell, Tsnneesee. Hale New Hampshire
Brodefok, California. Hamn, Maine.
Cameron, Pennsy yana Harlan, Iowa.
Chandler Michigan KiDg Now York
CoiAmsr, vermont Seward, New York.
Dixon, Courec Simmons, Rhode Island
Dooli.tle, Wisconsin. Stuart, Michigan
Douglas Illinois. sumner, Massachusetts,
Durkee, Wisconsin. Trumoul, Illinois.
fessensen, Name. Wade, Ohio
Foot, Vermont. Wilson, Massachusetts,
roster, ConaectcuL Total. ~
SArs.
Allen Rhode Island Houston, Texas
BsDjam q, Jonsasa. Hunter, Virginia.
Bggs, North Carolina. lverson, Georgia,
Bigier penus ylvapia Jones, Iowa.
Bright. 1bdisna johnson, Tennessee.
Brown, Mssissipp. Kennedy, Maryland.
Clay, Alabama. Mallory, Florida.
Crittenden, Kentucky. Mason, virginia
DAVIS, Mississippi. Pesrce, Maryland
Evaas. south Carolina. Polk, Missouri.
Fitzpairios, Alabama. Pugh Ohio.
bitch, Indiana sebastian, Arkansas.
Green MISSOURI Siideil, Iouisaoa
Gvin, California Toombs, Georgia
Hammond South Carolina Yuee Florids.
Henoersoo, Iexas Iotal..................5l
AnzSr
Bates, Delaware. Reid, North Carolina.
BayeTd' DebwEo Thompson. kea'Tcty.
Clafs, New Hampshire Thomson N.u f.
JOhnsoa, ArkanSas. Wright, Ne.
Mr. D1oS proceeded with LIS remarks .. ....
not quite pertinent 10 the rather be-. ... L,
the ksnsa mhroglio and having little reference - Inc
question Of the Increase Of the army.
Mr. Poor, (opp OF VI, followed. He opposed 10
an increase OF the army even thought might be re
duced without deirneDt 10 the country the Utah
trouble be would Withdraw the troops already there and
recall the government officers leaving the Mornons 10
the fate OF their vices and decisions IT, however,
was the intention, hal been suggested 70 send these
oo TO Kansas he was Of The opinion that the proposed
increase would fall far below the number that would be
required for the protection Of the frontiers against the
indians ne would say protect these poor indiana against
Their white sgEressos put stop 10 the wrongs ana rob
berries committed upon them withdraw YOUR Indian
agents and there viii be need to send troops against
them. sr. Foot continued AT some length IN similar
strain, closing with the remark in the absence OF
foreign IN the absence Of internal dscord aud in the
presence Of pending nationa bankruptcy. he thought
would best nbserye the interests Of The country 70 vote
Mr.. PuGH said gentlemen would bring in bill reduc.
ing both the army and navy be would vote for IT,
Mr.. BsNJAs1S, adm OF la, opposed the bill lie had
locked through ali the reports and documents the sub
Jet without seeing any good reason for increase Of tho
army. The expense would amount 70 one hundred AMI
forty thousand dollars He willing 10 support the ad-
in any reasonable measure but cJuld not vote
for such proposition.
not dollar 10 send troops to Kansas Utah, and
would never sanction by his vote executive lie
agrted with the senator from Vermont aud would recall
20 Their tate.
The debate was renewed next day Senator'S Mason
(dem OF Virginia Crttenden, opp Of Kentucky Hale
Iopp OF New Hampshire; Ilcuston opp) Of Texas and
Davis DEN } OF Mississippi, participating.
Nj hhs1S confessed 70 bui little knowiedge In the mat
ter, bit relied on the estimates Of the War Depart nent
He world vote 70 The army wth,ut c6nsderiug
that be was merely blndy registering thc edcts Of the
Executive.
Mr. CRrrxNDKy, topp) Of Ky advocated the bill, .p,o
giving the army having Performed greater fea.s than
any Ia the world Of similar numbers.
Mr. HAtB, (opp) OF N. H. would state In behalf OF the
Administration though not by request that the govern
eai does DOT de ire the bill 70 pass He fortified b. DO
elton BY reading article IN 70 days Jaion Although
be Olse) would not endorse the administration in all
things yet be would vote ID accordance With IL desire to
M aousroS. (opp) o. Texas, opposed The Bill, saying
be would never Asan vote 10 increase the army. lie