New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-05-07
Id " INTELLIGENCE
SUPREME COtRr-CTSSEAL Tgss-Nsy 6-sss-
Judscs DAvizs hesaHas AID svrstst.so
a. -tna Liz lnturaacr c. Alnh-,.. 49,.


Ths rohey was taken out Dec. l6 1885, AID delivered
to dee ndsrt BY the plaintiffs sg ut residing al Poasa
ktepsie The ceferdart sne ti'soie resided ot Rbins
heck The declarsicrs and representations made be-
fore suing the policy dated the S,h Ard 1tth u
December. They are signed BY Frisois and by tbs
defendant ssd they cottsns positive Representatives
TIA. Frisb'e had never been sihc.ed win erinns
o.ood" The defendants deolsrst!on slso confAn, On
syerr EFT that be hoe Interest 10 the ne OF nj.
Frsbe to the fa.i amount Of tie said cum OF esoW
snc se Teeu that this declaration should be tae
hsss e the trsct with the Con psty. trsbe cied
Sept 80, 1851 and ire plaintiff rai the loss Oct %
ISL. After the pay men' plaintiffs were utorm>d X
tie sieged fraad ard this seton was brought 70 re-
cover tIe swoant paid.
DeftUdsi: answered With general cenis.
Toe jury fou'd verdict For defsndasi, and tbs
paiut ffs eppe <d 10 the General Term. 1hs case
wss err ued b,foT the General Term on Tueedsy.
JC>tph BAIT and Jobathsn Miller argred the Gaze
for pie mt III. aud Charles Conor for defendant De-
C>cn reserved.
Rihsrd X Ho.dan. ast Jrsse W Benedict and othegs.
ISCRsHs, J.-It can hsrdly be pecesssry to csts
sores show bs, where rae erchanse poses for de
q either such notes MOTTO be dered seemmea.,oe
e~n note eher ma, .. tie note Of the other business ps
snd tie sale Of such notes ea,sr rate OF discount tha
IL .rei De sa,S s.eS.Sss oo:s. ssoaa
' pS II: s s. r. as,. s X: S s
sS s oh Cos $ o ss yS ss the al
.ideaii e the note Even sfer such failure sosrdmaa
ppr thew GO ia have eeosred SpSS the So. !. ss bud
pap su on h' right Of Ho'dsne % set ssarst
chnrc Ii. tote, If Le sl bed them Iii. ouy n.e in
such sciiou would have b. counter eI snd cot dea. St
wioe theory which ihe rsnnd seeks 70 SUSTAIN hI 'Dane
Bcs edic, H. h.. rc,.d the p.n'ia o,hss
's y, @ H Upon he credit paper
right PAID the hm and TO collect sueh
any q the detto'' whose note. he holds The pAsde
nc, b. gNdci sur, for the bim OF Bosrinss Co b.
tovrrsy evolved BE- much h.e this paper ssy os
ii tie notes pedsdto Benedict ~heu tho loon We
c.nno. be nsceaIy here TO iraar. Sh. would b The
Of B. .'tm.a Co bsor. maturity may vs;, 5. aosSsi
plaintiff such could have made any defense
char FOr. some The case. 90 90 fer .. 70 .v. the psius
70 bis ted, as creditor Of the incvTn sIS 'ssrns va
SS Sss tor Ss ss be h sS%pss
note. security to b. rsIaed iro% c.llectins bis claims
be compelled resort expensive litigation 10 order to
ree, he psaa from portion Of the LIABILITY "hiea be- As
have sfsDed from noticing the question which SIS.
argument the rse Of the p.aa DC P.y
defendant Bepeds possession becsu'e consider the Other
S,' upon s yps: ,.s, o, name, 70, VAIN, ar,
well established doubt should exist - to e1foreies s0ss
& rhfs the SS fsS that v iSs P' S n. ss
pledged. III creditor has the first can 70 payment and unA
Toe raccn gsued this should Be- dissolved aud ~
''''' q Is S@sssssss-MsvS~ Bsforc Juds. DAVIES
BULKLEY DIVORCE cAsEs
Mary Brs'y sss Lucio' sGsiIs5-Lr'"' BaAl'' '' May
The Sc are actors for divorce Cross motions
were made this morning. tomske the complaints mere
oefr tie and certain. The Judge decided that the
complaint fra, served had precedence and the defend
art in that action might set up Automatically IN hn
answer to that complaint any relief he demanded.
Mis-. Bukleys complaint was served fret. conse-
guept the motion To amend her complaint was az
he'd which will have the effect # consolidating the
suts. For MIR. Buckley, Mr.. Bellows tor Mr. BULK
| ley, ex.Judge Beebe.
pEcIsIoss.
..,J l%a.4 n NanuaYV0orf a VI
Lewis Kaufmen agt Betsey Kaufmsn.-Defesdsnt
,aSny !. I ss Of week for her support Tho an
mony from the time Of fling the complaint
Before Judge SUTHERLAND
Williams act. Williams.-,Judgmen Of divorce
AntGu Heine sgt Matthias Zimmerman. Notice
ClRcrir- MAY s-Befors Judge ALLEN
ALAwrER NuicTED.
Cypiian Tsllant sgt Mortimer De Mott
Action TO recover moneys placed in DEFENDANTS
bands attorney to settle the affairs OF scopsrnsr-
siip between plaintiff ard Mr.; Mercier-sspOrtea On
era dict for plaiLtn fer tho full AMOUNT claimed,
90 7l2 ~ Charles Matthew esq., fer plaintiff John
n. Whiting, esq., for defendant.
The Poole Of he State Of ss Henry igyles
Til suit is brought by the Attorney General to set
sde gran, made by The Commissioners Of tho Lsod M
flee to iS pe en- f were go 10 the y
Conmis,iouers lands under adjoining the Navy yard
for The s eI p9%e" f
The UsJ Icy within the boundaries OF The cy
EwYork the County Of Kings specified In the
graft pVion the nsLins Of th. grant The Com% s.
;P. o s s s aaSs %o f BE-
ts applicant should proSS.: a.. : :.s G. %:
Of the hs.eos Of the town ID which such lands
situated stain that the snds spilled Tor we're not more nAa
opsit to be obtained sud they believed to be the
as Intention of ss .1Ps that to believed IN me
for che purpose Of f rSs 1 SsRsis .sI y | the su
sde The that il hsdeler sesiss that The Com
induced TO make by means Of frsndoest ems
seor' The defendant Of certain msten. iss. sod q ne
he suggested that the snd titussd IN inc Cy
whS W.. not true that he dd NOT produce
psnoe with tie standing rule ct the Commnopen aeisnos
sss, .st hs y n the .u sOmp
The up for tis to-day Considerable do usutsV
Theoecre se5swk end Charles OCoaos for the pAnas;
Francis c It'll for DEFENDANT
supERIOR CouRT-CnAMBrss-Msy 6.-Bsofs Judge
PIEsRsro>r
IxcRIEF sATsELL TO BIZ ExAMIsyD IN RELATION
TO THE RIOT or THE HTH or Jrss.
Henry Green sst Fernando Wood
Tbi.s ne Of the saut and batter t. growing out
Of ex Mayor Woes resistance to the fervice OF civil
prccess on i'm on the 18th Of June last. fsw days
nee Mr.. W. j. A. Fuller, of council for the psint6
IN III, sut appeared before Judge Pierepont and
,ead an affidavit setting forth that George W. hshel.
e..Clef Of Police was an important witness in the
case AMI that he would probably be out Of the State
when TIE Gaze should come up for trial. Upon this
,ffdayt NJ. Fuller applied for an order to examine
Mattel, additionally a. to his knowledge, &C., o. the
eve ns which took place at tie time Of the alleges
ss-sut The Judge grated the order, and Mr.. MAJ
eli will probably be examined on Friday.
sptciaL TERs-Nsy Before Juas- Boswosra
DEcisi0ss.
Pelt. .er sst Swift & Observation-Disclosures sst-