Nashville union and American. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1853-1862, 1858-08-31

4
Edmond Goodrich Is DaTa BrTsns. -
The e6mpFaaailt g5d hrs SifsBsey sepa55se
1st5 and So coniilued until her dean 20 -
the ds6e Of {he separaii0S the cor sss,s,,
ed and delivered 70 her ths ms. 91Sl'' "a
folloWs: la. q ~ eead into gbis {
f ssscs Y Ffet5 set aeea Edmond Goodrich q 1
- ,,s.sFi add Lefty 6 odrlch o. me othet par,
-. = ~ stuteof Tsnnessee- hhnesse n mar /
- E.u.ond Goodrich doh Rgree, and hereby l
- bimselE bis heirs and executors and aqminls !
,r.,e IN be penal snna ioU9 70 be void On eonal-
tion as folloEss .ralafa- al @. -.i.of- d7a 81
.sWbereas. be said lnand has tbisday eLee1'e ca
his t,aF prdmis.0ry no-es--ene . due Dee 70, 1852
for $50 made psynble - z * 3 ya2i, iog ne eA
elusive use aud heot6t Of said Lelys one Payaes ~
ah,vs dnre Isl Aay 1856 f0r S25 one her p"y7oie
as sbove for So rue 25th b c 1876; a1a enc -
able as above f0r $500 due % Desi TO- -
the said Edmond doh bereP3 oina . n'ln "a ns
-. .,.c,,r,s md 4i4n'r' ttat kel5iss7 asW set
I'm, r. ,s property l,5'Jg q1oiEiehs he a2ge,
-, ~, s,..s BE- easaer II ar possessed d
,osS,r,ony vbefeof abe SAID e im0nd hath
bo,I,,,t, - his band and scale l-srl ta.sl -l
"kDM GooDRICE, Sal s-r- s..
Tssoai4 onasiiaH Isl EheLhe ne comp lainant vas
1t3ed Is ksisbaul 70 IN TaU Of tisez luna thus
settled upon her. he pToperiygia Ba'en.l W
vested remaining NJ her-deass. 'acc rding 90 -'es
above deed Of setlleuieuG u1ragan s't = ils .o1ss
oertauly be So as they were diyonoSe' y nc NJ
nryeuded hy his deed Buihe hrsl faali en- ssa''s'
IL that the ed ls FQiis pel USE Aist~ - 49,
ems vIfea ara FHhout tru-tee. Whatever tae
Isv NAV have at one lime, been, on his question:
ia is certainly we'll srtlt now, aud mas neen oI
century 70 he contIaTy 2 story Eq' sec looO
In our own reports, there afe lns9y aoCol 1aH'
cases and h ne 10 COZ ficf on The qatctty upoh
,hewf then. tae1e can Be 90 doubt But sil
miles, he has GUIDED or esopped himself heW 'uti
he.epsl,ld 10 The properly lsfs o. her dean, anu
particularly ii she has made no F,'ia al t -,
il The il insisted he dlds peiOls ns' N'-'-s -
nanirset a o the asfeHdants
M - question. fhuwpyeT va viii nave nola
$500 a. ID rs enough for This case TO hota
We nov %, thar the eomPt4'haNs hts % F'lI'
cI,;m To sh0n the proper goes ey la"' o. con
traei with her. or u9asi sI5 1'sp ~,
her il not material nov TO consdera 4his Is no'
Sasl rrovi.Iipv for a sepaUsTisR and makes no
-.f.ra,ee a that as past or r. Cre event. alu Is
not thereN re- liable 10 the o'Jeeton OF me 6 Ouhu
ofpsFcy that is held, in son ei nc cases 70 SfP,y
a, I'M lind of deeds ms simply settlement Oh
-, 40 ,be separate use OF The WIFE win an
-. 49,, on his part ncUer 40 set up any claim 10
mis- eoutd1be so construed, 81 20 oe oonune1
taths continuance ofthe coEef'H'e' sls r'ent W.
reviveai her dess aIiu his Dill cou'a De
but The Terms use zoo strong 70 oe 90 iiu1e"'
- a,,.i evfen 10 all lines. and accounts 20 an
entire reljpoutsb meut of al right 10 that or any
other properly she msy acquire ..,.-
The separation having uecurfedi theotgect on MS
psrt vas 10 set over 10 bis wife aosoo'eiy' tha'
nat Of his estate and she so received and eld u
A. an evidence O. his being the intention, aud
understanding Of The parties some agreeme a. seems
t,-h.ve existed Whslher bindH or not, ihat
va never 10 clsim'aUy luther par' el BIS ss'a'e
1b.s bqaAs il nav "a com aiuau ctnuoi oe per.
m,rsito sect up any claim to Ibis properly IN me
face OF his deed, sofmals ezfened- The ,asss oi
Lotus VS. Penn, / swan $50 and HsmHeo vs.,
Lard 10 Terger 2Z2 tho not preeise'y slulaf ~
tneir facts 10 ihfs zee, set forth prineiPes "hou
,,,,ai,,. IN. view Ee have taken Ia iced The man
ifuor1he oaly object cf ans deed. must have OssE
TO exclude his rig the property absolutely an,
fosuv. as h 10 7es for heiuOds provided we mad'
10 a trustee for her separate use and dement, an
nycessity Of any further writing fr m him But /
is question OF clustru .ion rather than inteniioh
YET upon eilber grounds, the result would nav
been The same l1
The decree dismissiug the bill is affirmed.
CABUIHERs.
Test. NJ D wrreu, Clerk and Nas,er. p. s-h7