The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-02-10


was lost, by yeas %, nays 81, as ohows:-
YRAs.
Bell, Tennessee Hale, New Hampshire.
Frederick, California. Hasniin, Maine
Cameron, Pepbsy lvana. Harlan, Iowa.
andler, Michigan. kicg, New York.
Nollamer, Vermont seward, New YORK
Dixon Connecticut. simmons. Rhode sIland
tDoolite Wisconsin, Stuart, Michigan.
Douglas Illinois. sumner, Massachusetts,.
nurkee Wisconsin. Trumbull, Illinois.
.lessepder, Maine. Wade, Ohl9
loot VerUont. wilson, MASSACHUSETTS,
NAYS.
Allen. Rhode Island. Houston, Texas.
erjanin Louisiana Hunter, Virginia.
Riggs North Carolina. Iverson, Georgia.
B,ger, Ienns yivania. Jones, Iowa.
BRIGHT IDdana. Johnson, Tennessee.
Grown, Mississippi Kennedy Maryland
Clay, Alabapa Mallory, Florida.
Crittenden, Kentucky. Mason, Virginia.
Davis, Mississippi. Pearce, Maryland.
Evans, South Carolina. Polk, Missouri.
Fitzpatrick. Alabama. Pugh Ohio.
Fitch, Indiana Sebastian, Arkansas.
Green, Missouri S,idell, louisiana.
Siwn, California. rcombs. Georgia
Hammond, south Carolina. Yuee, Florida
Henderson, Texas. Total ................3l
ABSENT.
Bates Delaware Reid. North Corolina
hsysrd, Delaware. Thompson, Kentucky.
Clark, New Hampshire. Thomson New Jersey.
johnson. Arkansas. Wright, New Jersey.
Mr. PuGu (adm.) of OHIO advoc sted Mr. Douglas mo-
tim 10 totne the Army b but voted against the post
2onemsnt after making 40 explanation
Mr.. MSsos, (aim vi Va, said that when Mr. Douglas
resolution was called up twas MT previously tabled
woud lead to very long debate, ana, adopted its
elect would he 10 t. the halls Of Congress the
element now existing in Kansas. He would therefore,
when comes up, move to lay on the table as test
question the ground that is Lot proper subject Tor
the consideration Of the Seoae.
Mr.. PUcH stated, in explanation OF his vote on Mr.
Douglas notion that although lie was in favor OF the
kansss resolution he should vote against the postpone
peot Of the Army bill by any ne" discoveries
Mr DIXON, (opp.) OF Conn, replied to Messrs Toombs
and others subjects Of Kansas and slavery In tho
Of he remarks he referred 10 the Presidents letter
to Professor smai euogizrg the latter gentleman as
the Of the highest mnd III the scientific world, and
as having aai, cd which, the President
himself should reach he might we'll be satisfied.
lie referred to the eondon Of the Northwestern Terrific
r relative slavery and oonended that the repeal OF
the Missouri compromise just Genial OF the right Of
government TO interfere with the Territories in relation to
slavery He referred TO the fraudulent character Of the
Knas elections and to the interference of government
troop those elections denoancug the latter as an act Of
'usurpaon He rejoced that the question was no longer
In relation degraded race put general one, ia which
every might forget his pr,judices. He alluded to
Presidents suggestion of PROBABLE dissolution Of the
Cnioe the Kansas question settled any basis
other than Southern The suggestion was mon
strous He had no te,rs of such result Connecticut is
ncn loving Sta C. but when she is met with such
Unrest she is silent lie concluded by faying that II the
people OF Kansas not allowed to chose for themselves
on the question CT slavery the North would show united
trout such she never exhibited before.
Mr. foor, Opp o. Vt, called the attention OF the Sc
nate 10 the subject immediately before II lie was OPP
posed increase OF the army aud tho ngh, IL
might be reduced without detrment to the country AS
TO The Utah troubles, he would withdraw the troops al
ready there, ard recall the government officers leaving
the Momons TO the fate OF their vices and deusons
IT. however, the intention, as had been suggested,
to these troops kansas he of the opinion that
the proposed would fall far below the number
chat would be requei for the protection Of the IRON
tiers against the nGans ho wogo say protect these poor
InGans against their white aggresstrs put stop 70 the
wrongs and robberies committed upon them,
withdraw your Indian agents, aud there VIII
be no need 10 send troops against the N.
Mr.. Foot continued at some length in similar strain,
closrg with the remark that in the abscnce OF foreign
war the absence OF internal disoord, and in the Orc
scnce Of pending national bankruptcy, he thought IL
would best suoservc the interests OF the country 10 vote
against tho bill IN all ns pats.
Mr. rUCH said, II gentlemen would bring IN a bill ro-
6ucps both the army and navy, he would vote for H.
Mr.. BiNJAMS, (adm o; Ia, opposed tho bill lie had
eosed through all the reports and documents on the sub
jcc without seeing good for an increase oil the
army The expense would amount 70 one hundred and
forty thousand dollars He was willing to support the
administration IN any reasonable measure bu, could not
vote for enci proposition.
Mr.. H1silS fopp Of Me-, opposed the Bill be
would collar 10 send troops TO Kansas or Yah,
aod would never saDcon by his vote executive wal
He agreed with the Senator from Vermont and would re-
call the troops and OH sals from Utah, and leave the Nor
mons 70 their fate
adjourned.