New-York daily tribune., 1858-03-08

there We. II gi-,,ise Assembly in France ,et "
universsl suffrage and vote by bsii0i- ~ * S,'I
He concluded amid much cheering py PfOP''e
following amendment: go. ,5s,ed
The, recent s,i'mP.s oP9n the NE Of ise Of
such suiliy rpr. Tbs; ,5 HJ4-" " ready 8 a. e,
s u I,,nSyas 'nJ se' ~ As St e.Sat -
that h.. hsts;ys Sov'rnneui P'rIious - ihYi-i - - o..
~, su,y 10 ,t. me req - M. important dsp:-h fr'iss
n N he French GOvera.n.s daies Pas Jaug-y D. I, -
Nj B.Iyts and sit GFoR0E GRFY -PJke II ih'o'
Of the bill, and Mr.. W,LPoLr gain; H. - .;rs,
SIR. PLEL said he bad, on former occisIoa
q tilep. vote The question va one oi sTsa: luP
ance, sid tie speech II the noble lord tie frns ~
iser YVES calculated ~ lead then ss:rly lie ,ho"sh'
il strarge that the noble ord, the hea1 o' the I'oS
party, should baye introduce oIl sh"h h:aIy o.
The Iibe-nl members =, ted ac1nst No no, rom l1t
Ministerial benches ! The speech Of tn noble 3ru
he member for l. bdon' most patriotic and Iha'
Of the hon. member for Sheffield was eio4ueht, acl-e
ard spirlted 10 long a. foreign refugees reinaAe'
dnie, in thi. country, be objected 70 .ntef7rhs
with the Inn which was given them. But the oH
WE Of such q character and IL prGv- Ons 30 anosr
Gus that for. gners ceive 10 their own government
might be roe.ted unGsr it. II these refugees col'
Ellted crime 8gaiIst this country, Jet the oe pun
i-hed IN Coos name. but Lord Broucham and LORD
Campbell had both said the law at present vas utn
cien'; and reward q LOO hal been offered i0I
Mr Allsop, and Mr. BERNARD Rad been taken Up, Dc
supIosed by the agency Of the French police. Az
BUdkiD, who sended 10 prosecute Tor the treasury
said, that by the law of the land an o6en.e -
libel foreign Emperor and II rnust therefore be pun
ishabls 10 corfpirc to murder foreign Emperor
Did rot this show the aT 20 he sufficient lie
agreed with the pVbe lord, the msnber ior the
City Of Lon Ion, ths: to pas the bill you'd be
degradation to the Ilouse OF Comm d. But
tie bill was n shain, although II had been iatIo'
duced by the noble lord at the dctation Of another
lie bad beard with great regret the Lohe lord state N
that House, that the assertion tha' Englaod was a1
asylum for assasslps was true. lie nsVer e1prcleu
- l.. -. Inovd Ia
noble lord wC ud consent 10 Introduce such bill uude
foreign dicaioD He noticed the language Of hatery
used by the PreeIdept OF the Senate To LOUIS Aapo
leon and caused some laughter by reading sddrs see
made by The sden Of the Senate to the first Aapo
oon in 1906, which contained aduatoIy language OF
most extraordinary character lie detested the crime
Of Oisin and Paaor ard would have joined IN pass
rg O resolution expressing deep regret az such u
crime but be could not consent to the House Of Com
mons passing law under dlctatioD. Times ha1
changed since the noble lord was a Roman citizen,
aDo be now permitted two OF his couutrymen 10 Ian
eulsh IN the dungeons at Naples, UncaTed ioT drl u-
protected. Cheer.
The LorD Aovoc,rE called back the attention Of
the House TO the real state Of the que.ton which was
whether they were to throw out bill that had been
INTRODUCED tb the assent of large majority. The
amendment, although 1t had nothing to do with the
bill, would be fatal TO IT, He denied tha, there was
any yielding TO foreign dc.aion ana II there wa the
slightest preterse .Or saying that It would infringe any
Of The Liberties Of the country he Tor one would not be
there to defend il.
Mr. GLADSTONE sad there wa a disposition TO mi K
two di.eussors which could not without great mis-
chief be confused. IL was proposed to aer unccT an
pect tfnenIce provision Of criminal law intimate.
y affecting the rights Of every indiv dual Hear hear
He could not agree that the alteration OF the Law was
in itself light but how was he TO eyadc the re-
sponsibily which dcvolved on him. without any state
ment Of high legal authority especially as the D. va
recommended not upon legal or social grounds but tor
purely political 1easOns. The hon. member to: Nor
iolk Mr.. Bentinck sad they called on 20. con.
slider whether trumpery diplomatic correspondence
was complete or not. But by diplomatic cOFrespon-
dencCs war and peace made, and the credit or
discrtdit Of nations incurred. Ii might Ee mixed
up with chicane, but diplomacy ono oi she tfi-
uinphs Of civilization which brought IN 70 bear
when the sword failed. But surely when the credit
and honor Of the country werr al stake was r6ht ior
the Ioufe Of Common TO exercise its vigilance. He
would not advert TO the ideas entertained OF
laws or customs in France but the di+patch o.!
Count WalCHtk contained allegations most Offensive
and most untrue lie expressly said that the doctrine
Of assassination was preached openly was ms true
Was any conscious Of il Why Va2 tuch contuct
not corrected ioT the laW was sufficient 10 correct IL
this had been the case, those who ought 70 have ap
ueaed 10 the Government 10 put down had tolerated
/. Such allegations demanded notice and an answer,
if national honor was not sham and name Cheer
IL was the pcr,mptoTy duty OF the Government 10
have answered them. iCheers They were called on
TO alter the law Of England without having gone
through the decent forms Of legal inquiry without
knowing what had transpired IN France, and without
now pg how far the law az stood was suihccnt.
What was the consequence No answer nas made -
this dispatch, which was presented 70 the House IN
ctIreoiion with tie bill Therefore in effect, the bill
WA 10 be the snswer. The bill of the noble lord would
be wholly imperative in securing the detection Of the
Offer der and If the House egslsed upon the dispatch
now lying Oh the table, they would lsy the nseyes
open TO further and more insulting demands. we
talked Of progress and freedom and he believed that
we yere advancing; but he would be ssnguine OBJ.
server who might have watched the evone Of Europe
for the last years without pofcelvns that though
there was movement abroad, II was doEnWaid ana
1..l IL
the earth in which liberty was now eacred, and in
these times more than ever the responsibility CEN
tered in England Of preserving uhupaired the char,
ac;er for freedom and liberty hct tor Centuesf LSd
proudly enjoyed. Loud cheers
The ATToEHEY-tiESERiL REPLIED and .
Mr. DIsRATII said the At;orney-General had asked
with what consistency any honorable member who
voted or tie introduction Of the BIZ could supper. the
am, nonen. Of the right honorable member for Asa
ton He my Ds!sel) confessed that he entirely
OF any Inconsistency whatever. Zen days
sao the question was whether the House would not
,boy the sincerity Of their feeling respecting frSnce
uIder the great ciie which hsd been Committed, by
cor aeptipr 70 the introduction Of BILL But many Of
s suppt tiers sated expressly their regret that no
answer 70 Count Walewskis dispatch had been DIS.
PATCHED. Could il be said now that they were NO:
justified in expressing their ie9ret al the continued
lscbes Of tie Government The question was not
now between the Government Of England snd that Of
France but one which altogether related TO the con-
duct of the MiristIy. No member Of the Treasury
Beuch had ofereda single reason 10 llsIlhcauon OF
their conduct Tie dapatch Of Count Waiewski had
rot opIv been read TO ihe British Ministers but pub
T.bed IN the Honfcr, snd from h re circulated IN
ty.1y psrt OF Europs. Where wss the answer given
10 that dispach Was il sufficient that an apology
sbouid be made privately between two men Of the
world who perhaps merely shrugged their shoulders
and said nothing? Should that be considered g sutf
Gent answer There Was mystiicStlon about the
uhoia matter which 10 Minister ct the Crown had
been enabled 10 explain. lie told aud believed
,Lr. tbese efdrt sses complsLrd OF appeared In the