The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-03-29
Important Opinion Of City Judge Russell,
Disc hnr giDg an Irsolvent from his Debts.

MEcu "a n the mater Of the DUPLICATION of K:71ry
Il. AueTy .solre@ 70 Be Discharged from has Dss
Ths 4, application By the petitioner and many Of his
creators have N good faith debts owing to them by
such debtor under the act entitled "An of voluntary
assignments made pursuant 70 the application Of an
so.vrt and lis creditors for his discharge At the time
o. the pIesenaca Of the pettOn schedules SC Ar order
VAS nsoe by requiring al the creditors OF such IN
sciyeD:tc STOW cause, any they have at certain time
soG place speelsd BY me, why assignment of the in
sv,.r ss.., should no, be made and he be discharged
from RS ceo.s.
Or 10 re.lrn day Of sail order C P. n :. Williams
an Z :. WILLIAMS a Co, whose names inserted in
dc soleiuls apuexes the petition containing lie, Of
al tpe cito;;ors % the ss1 Htury 4 avery, N the fol
lcv'-C v,Tcs &c I. Il N..!!ams, New York city
s. 5i 10 Fooas bong aat ricres, 70 Aus s, 1854 ,r
tn- eccelti,c cos oflo1ghn Avery This claim barred
5y TIE s,Ltote o. rr1ti.Ons. : Villains \ CO New
Yof. c-ff $40 - gooos bought ard Interest u august
I is54 Tor an accsI taa.e oi iiughlo s Avery. rbs
ain barred y tAs statute Of hnti IONS appeared
al c-ecte1 10 Ese discharge Of the SAID Avery on the
Eie C'y Jatss hls no Jurisdiction o. thls mater
The J-Iaao.p, Iosssssed, NEST DC tervsa from me
Tea; ACT cnDiefs upoc such Judge only tie judi
c lcsfTs ves;ei by law ne Recorder, ana authorizes
o. G currently WITH saf Recorder 70 perform AMI DIS
change AL judicial cu.s imposed upon SUCH Recorder.
tbs st cor tot confer urea slca Judge az the roEers
Sufre-e C,rt Comusoners had jar siicp)n OF iosol.
ye-t cases aey eee 10, Judges Their alta we're oIet
hCl ltll' a.
g. rhc rancs c. TIE c1rtesiants c p IF. v1llilns
Ni,iirr & O. having been inserted N the sch5-
que annexed % tie 2etcc as creditors aad notice uader
'ae satle hAv ns peer served aPon taem taey are al
Oru thereby 20 agJeAr ant OBJECT to tao dscha go OF
~, petitioner, w,hoG, iftt poyag their claims rs SUD
10 .1p CLAIMS.
g. The ca:mo1y offered and rejected OF the rresonta
o2 O. bc peic1 aai scoeiule annexed AZ tao previous
tmef ani thai the schsdue dit rot then contain the
~ofJ hs ann "a barred BY the statute OF limitations
oQpoFte 40 oaines u G. i. Williams AMI r. :. vi
sos z Co srs -la.eftai irasnuch % that was az =,
fOurfuel 10
-aiy 20 b. charged thereby AID WA sufficient - take
fhs ca-c outoi toe cpe-a1on q ths s'state
As TIC lrst Tc1' "a set have 10 do-b a. 10 NJ ~
rsdc' u IA tae ma.;er. IL s.s s1heI hsi previously
fls' rysef upon b. csre "a examination an cons.
&c Led 10 the case reop3 w. Wood. b; the act o,
le iegatuo crssiB, he oHi5e Of City Judge (aws Of
$50 "ss, ~ q i-tlnc,iy AIRED thl, ''an ID
d- p-vss yCsiei oy aw n tao Recorder Of the o.y Of
Et~ fJfk are hereby conferred upon such tine City
Jul &C. BAD (;ae) City Judge bal ooneursenty WITH
%. Cael h'ecToer perform ard escsarse al jatcal
dGi-s nposed upoa (be) 8oor5er " The Recorder
O. s-lse q To Corr Of Common Feas for the city ana
| County 81 Yes YORK, Las the sane powers ~ the
Juca specially elec.s :cT that corrt ana the powers Or
lie iAisI - supreme CosItCou ssopsrs, are expressly
uaws oilsi7. = 2sl ,scc 7) Tas law h.s ubiereIas
Jru.ca cc3struItca BY TIE Court Of Appeals hs ste
RsaNrd ~ HAfs-ns telc., 2be) sad tie decson o.
Iior Corri orths oy al &c found su.taln FOLLY snd
complete ,ns position The night OF the Recorder
ter sn It's application czn5o. De doubted. l. ne las the
! lcwtF the C,y Ju ise hss h.31.
Af 70 he second oat tc Insertion Of the names Of he
4
manner above stated ana The notice seryel them dos
rot artAore cin 70 appear aud OBJECT 70 the discharge
They are not recognized ~ creditors " sa petitioner but
The c1rrAry expressly denied that they have any
ssa cam against said petitioner. The ststnte ray ~
".seTy CREDITOR opposing the discharge, evidently
meas ts0se who are fecogniysi IN The scheaus az such
- the rfOlvsD, CAR :. IA ed. D. gOi sec. 49, Az
OF utsn N iB 20 oppose the discEarga such
Gf5 Prove Their Ca subsstinC CLAIMS, Jner
&c hot authorized TO ana op ose los
hrrgs me % The ihTd AID most 1psr'an, iou. IN ira
clreihe rejection % the evidence oarod oy INC
tesl'-s. IL vas urged before me that the evidence
th1ad be received because il acsnC Nlc 1gcueut
subc ut iO iaxe the case out Of the operation o. the
ftairte. Ihat formerly WA the Law, aud was -
g Cowcn, K, 1853, 1879 anc any cfcrmsao;gs
frcr1 which promise might be fairly inferred sum
cert D tar cse 0ni Of he operhoo u the saiJe bdi
IN 1886 brought before the court Of APP
peal. = tc BosigOod Pruan q Sc o.. 3f7 and
The principles ~ aw Poveruirc tbs fully a1f
mined, ani the casc U 5ry IN vs Whuow
tv.rTuG. TIE aingon ul.do "a TIE Ease of bosigopj
vs. 0fGch ~ sworn answer "a cnsnoery, wherein
the rrbt nckno redEct - be due, AMI wa urged
D., sufficient 10 avoid ne Jsr ct Tue trGe, brt G.
Colrtta5, That the tRerent Boi b91g male ~
tts creator, agsOt persOn representing hin.
~ae BOT suite en " there 3e no express promise but
1 promise u rised by implication Of lag from he &C.
kn9W'ecPneat 81 the rayy such ackn0wed Tmeni ought
q Cc1an upqus1ei and direct admission " present
sI1s.si * dctt which the fLrty s liable and wlns 70
he prespmp If promise Intention 10 nay, a: they
DOT gO TIE jury NJ evid"nce u new proelse
las Code aso requires Iaa. ali promises 70 take tie
or u re operation ~ tho statute m1s be W wf us 60
~ TIE PARTY % be charged voorhes cd code 1851,
be tsstnsoy offered ~sg therefore properly reec,e;,
on the par, " TIE petitioner, Heny A. Avery 'hey are
enle1 and nsye right 70 orpes hli c'scharre,
the'o betg legal obec- " the sppnca0n s9d the
Dscsrs beng reg1ar s1i IL accordauce viii 80 statute,
or1ered tps hs prayer OF the ps;tousr be grant a.
------------------------
1RNNrsstP JraiaI Afr aF-Tls body adjourned