New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-01-19
JrnsrY CIV SAVING. BA>K,.-The twenty -siga tA
La " INTELLIGENCE

SUPREME COZ RT-SrroIsL rrsN.-JN. is-BcfSfe Jsass
Wilson fyre ,Ia Louisa Lln Les, Eyre n. ~ir e., ESws.
The complaint snege. that ToSis. lear in NJ. M,
W. %, OWE, AID ro;r..o, q .s ssui-, q sst' "a
Io., Le'f ennaed 70 ps.. ,he .s uH hts e.,A "a SIS.
1850 ~h,n the, OIL, I'D 20 NJ. ibs Gr ~ ca gaI.
Pee by tAe widow OF Tohia. Lar
roSs. f~.r ard H. claim .n. ,cs rsr wax Rs., gs "a
ected aud bound into yolusis. seheI PruPery
l.n su,hcri,cd Sy the widow q Tos,. Ls po.s
OF sail eer. ne complaint sso sNsr' ihs to- ps.Aaas
volus eer. snd d.mAnd.d Of ihr arru.,..
Who hav ri I'D "a d,erH Up bet To THIS oSaysin the
dcieudants denur upon tress grounds:
F5.i Bssuse the r,s,.cnisis,. of Genera wsassos
sord Thar The .p. q lime since 'he a~s,h Of rb.: Lear
,d Because he COMPLAIN docs NJ, state ' suf eui 70
y ~ soDsb,oD t,r d.,.n.s,., A. , Cram a, ,l.,o,,s.
DAVIS l hall conhne myself Ia the dsps,ion o, THE
d,muIrI 90 the question o. ally du.-cd % 70 .Itusss
IL Tbs. Lc a. the rsr.ou 10 whn iSsss tssss -
ST;1S bad s. any I sa sS'a he .Ns G x.
plaintiff Mrs. Eye, the 'os ownsI of tho lser' v0st
IL Lesr I'D any property Ia the etisrs sov. fOun tho A.
m' IN The p,idns' tha that property IL no~ ''sd IN ss
think ihs rule aid down BY Load Hardwisse In the
Pop @ III AZ. ~ s s,i = "Sss S ss, 70. 90.
property IN 6am. Po..h,the PsoPfy IN the p.p~ Nag
SsSs S SS , SS OBJ sr. to the void ~ %s
hs l,cys Ia. only n' FSry s ,s' sI Der al, -.
sued .Emicu q ST. l9'es DneT q hs s6r cOu'' Ia shs
have ben ,hc 70 sud IN al The s.s,. rhsA h.,.
snhed sny9irl y coraie' With ,hsn isid Edsn .@,. 70
. en-, ~ III. pps :. Su ous rr.c,.-Ss, 5, .csss
letter the writer hsd syru ir the pgs q riial .sS
w. , s ..Sds..S ~, . ne an s = r..sss sss
I, s G sSiS ' ~hh the s. s, ". - ss, -, is'
h oee'd % e. g 70 6,c5se the rs.9rt,.. . litter. ~
Ia he writer and hs psr.u 70 whom they am addfr.ssd
inA the puclpe dsducible tum s DE Casrs ~, iss
ito has
,irpn the pubatot II t f'r. aud that oo.sn, - 81 b
rsed by the rii stranger thai To- ha<
no prrcny Ia the letters and ~, do viii them - h-
In n, case sucd TO- up,s .ce Due oI-eed go. ne
rce'er q hitter may INDEED reh = whs's y, pssass.
duct b., BIZ c,ns, has extended - Fisen he~
E so ' 81 ss ,' ~ e, I and SeT s sSs-f
Il follow. think that The rcsisr Of ssr be. grogsy -
d'i,. ~Ii on dtgasn. u,sig. s!.la =
sn, the wis o. hi. TO restrain the p0bs,os
The drmrref mus, 10 oyclrd with svo 10 the delsaass
| 20 rrw,N on payment IT costs
DECISIONS.
Before JUDGE INCH,u,s
IN the matter Of the estate Of Samuel Bradsire
Ordrr COZ frning port Of ref,fs- granted
MARY Duffy AIT. Bernard Duffy Order 10 be co
and he sum q SssIy from the mi. sr,,os
r her support aud ne sae which hs. sfrasd 70 be Pc
| hrst day II each month.
Andrew Campbell ct al. agt. Tborndike r. saaa.
George Wagner ct al. agt. Rufus l.. Cole ct d.
Motion denied with 70 o-, ,, . 10 PTadioe &C.
The rre.idsni DirsctSrs aud Company Of Qa.ns.
road ComIany-Seiled and the amendments allowed
Before Judsc RoosryEIr.
John =. Treadwell ct a. ag,. Myndert Van sohaick
q al -Serthe within findings and conclusions proposed
BY Defendants counsel and not o'Jc'ed 10 BY Pan'a'
COMMON PLEAs-srroIL TsRN-Jsn ia.-BesSre Judge
Huron.
INTERESTING DEcrSoss--yALiDIrY oF assIGssrsrs.
Ohihn Meyers.
The defendants. johnson, BRO sn and SNOW
coF.nt ~ IBIS tx Te urn came n'1yeni ssss .n' ZIG
B.wn aud snow oned in xerutns and delivering sersr. =.
snmfnt the defendants Larry Meyers Of all ID" ss~,.a
In No,smbei 1851 the plaintiff. recovered judgment ss.iBa
all the pstes r dsh owing BY the finn and executive on
III, complaint ssLs injunction restraining interference 70
that this ssmen De d. cared fraudulent ,nd Had reeriyes
i psid oa, 81 ,hs find. &C.
II did not 81 pear hst any served upn
nor va. dered attendants Larry aud Meyers
"l TS jude G5cdd that The 'e %
uI cton ard existed the appointment II
pesen the Injunction The moou vas thereoss
August wpiier ast Herman schiepsretsl
In January 1851 the plaintiff and the defendants.
scbp per Hsrbau. formed copariner.hp for the ir.ns,os
yem. Ia May 1851 the p,iniiG Europe temporarily
1pn the busns, tho copanerhp % solicit courhmsnts.
defendants schepeI Heshsu. wrote to h rssusns his
imm'di r,un Tbs etseI reached him 70 srnsay Nc,
His intention o. return communicated to b.. partners eys
letter written about the 9Th Of Noyemb' and sheh arrived here
on the LIT Of DECEMBER -
On Dec s. 1851 the defendants schepeI H-srhss with
out alleged the knowedge consent ~ the plaintiff
ted the defendant Bobr -,ed
me all the psrnep property In trust ff the benefit u The
crsdiiors the firm The asgc cet II the brin sud
resident of New-JeTsy. u.
The plaintiff lie arrival dec H. 1871 rr?udNed foe ~
ss.gnmeni and has ratified Ia any way fhcsn-
c,df that the firm 10 n-Dlyenf.
The suit comncncsd December ~ the complaint alleging
the facts and askng the Count 10 dissolve the oorass
slip order s'oouninr sppni reeeyer o. The nane.hp
ABIDE fraudulent audyod the attempted fenrtS
assignment made by shiepr Hearhas. ard 10 fes,ssa ths
deendaui. Temporary Injunction having been ordsre
uo, made coninus until 'hr hus dsterninsten %
The sor o appoint r~-isss q the PfoPcry ~
m tn The DEFENDANTS denied the fraud seed By he pain
tirS.
III. Jud.e ser the s ~ the noudss that
,L a..erur, SebrIs HesThsus without the
eu OF concurrence the plaintiff, absolutely Sotf snd 's1
her, Wa, no osiac, way u sniins 10 the psntf the
, sought followed tui ecr'.f must b" appointed Of al
E ~ the pariership aud The inrt0n eSis,ina
80 i,,.d ,ut the hus Judgment the he accordingly
rrd referrer appoint such receiver % fiAn,os W ROB-
inson, ESQ, a. refef.e