New-York daily tribune., 1858-07-13


Court Il the part of the retu'n referring % her
eepd b- smenGed by her pfotuclor, II would oe well
make full return e al his c0Upcity with the 81,
tsr Of 10th mother sLd dsug isT.
Mr " biting sad tlsi i sd been utterly impossible
for Mr. Bou5 to sccouut Tor 1e cordno; OF hs wife,
bu fer tie conduct OF bis daughter he could account
TgtTe were circumstances Of painful c JnscersOn
which had prevented Mr Blou,t from doing VIA, he
long srce wcu,t have done, ana that was tie fear
tIst although Mis-. Blount Ma n deprived OF ell her
res5Crite acu ties, get certain hsuclnstion OF mind
must have existed eccouCt for her conduct. L
oeiiIste tleiefc-e, that the Court should hiy-
private interview With her TO ascertain the oond ton
Of her miId, e. NJ BlouDt nad bse1 salshed tIom
the Coumeroemert Of his journey after her, 81
fer several ytsss pest, thet there hsd been
en- irrosd made upcu htf mental eu.les, AID ths.
COZ Quot could Lst be LCcoulted FOR on Guy principles
10 be sppiieo TO sound reasoning sad rstlors
ti(n. Frcm considerations Of tiedoess, De Eivisre
becsue 81 i'm ste Of AIR Blourts boass, and while
there lie opposed that De kyiere had operated 1oE
.he nird Of tie motaer. AID hsd induced her 70 BE-
lisye that the welfare Of her child sni Cer future sta
tion in life would be euhsncsd by CONNECTION with
this De Riy.sre, sud that, notwithstanding her
knowledge that this AZ De RiycIe had d wife Nv
/ Ing in New Yolk fbe yet believed that marriage
! d be Illegal, ard could Do., therefore, be
bs to alliance with tri De Rivisre. Some fiends
Of MIR. B.ouIt had Feel tie lady ard they had CONS
to the conclusion that she not the possession of
hey right mind, and especially upon this subject. 1t
vss, 10 feet, species OF memo nsni. iney desired
TO avoid aLy public exposure Of tne >5y oy her pes
tOuft II pCt-lUe. III MI BOnnt was
that she Lad sde up her mind in the full possession
of ler nta! faculties 20 aban5on his home, nothing
fnould interfere TO prevent her from going; but ir,m
fs daughter he could rot be thus abruptly severed,
/ 1rG be (Mr. w appleheIded that there WAS no mau
Who hsd heart In the righ place who would Tot lit
/ up mis- voice to sd tbs gentl smsn IN the
recovery of hs daughter. The hoLor of the
legal profession required nothing more thsn that tne
LAWYER should give legsl a1yics, ard when tns was
given there moral obligation resting upon the
professional an 10 restore to man 10 This situation
e al IL k. gFi IN "a
that there in this ate ard 10 Christian c5mmu-
rty lswyers who would stand side hy eide with suen
a5 De Diyiers in preventing the proper intl.
be ng used to tore 10 the husband sBd ther
bis wife aud daughter. II9 Mr. W. hsd appes Sled to
tuose gtrtlen Nbo reprcsenei De Riyere il vain
TO their Influence ana power to secure the return
Of the wife and daughter 10 this gentleman; for himself
be would gay that be would not be the csuse of the
agony e this father for oil the Iouayes In t-c Crnean
simy. TreDty-hve yesrs aso man who Touii per-
form Ell otce TO protec nah Ike thls ~ouId mol DO
permitted TO stay in The State OF New Jersey.
Hr MulfJrd sad that re had supposed that the
counsel had higher dulee TO perform than to utter n-
eiIustilIs against his opponents 10 the profession
He tar. NJ would rot speak for Gen. Wright but
foI himself hs would speak In answer 20 the direct
application of the eentlsmsD, that tie Ccuri have an
Interview with Mrs. Biount, lie should ibterpo'e 10
objection. Sc far as Mrs. Blouns alleged monomsns
Was concerned he had talk sd with the lady, and, IT she
were crazy, he could rever proofs of it. She had
told him mfr NJ distinctly t1a she could never 20 or
live with her husbsrd aeai1 and for this detsInins.
ton che had given him (Mr. her reasons. lie ID
rot wish 70 be dictated to by gentlemen a. TO
what advice he stogld give 10 his client. lie wss
srs9erable for thst upon bis oath 81 counstlcr
Of this Stats but he thought that the investigation OF
this would sho4 fully that tDey we're rgdt 10 the
they had pursued and further, tnat no sdylce
which he (Mr. NJ could give would affect Mrs.
Blounts determination with regard to her ielsors to
! her husband. lie bad no objection, and lndeed be
/ would be very happy if the Court would fret have
private Interview with the lady. L. would be salts
faction to her, and would relieve her from considerable
: br.ra hrfpr z e
Judge Ogden said there wss no need Of Mrs Blount
sppe sIirg IN Court at all. II was a proceeding In
chambers, and ste might be considered to be con-
stIuctively present.
Mr. BlouLt said he should regret very much to have
Mrs. Bl mt presented before an audience .,
Mr.. Mulford said he would amend the return with
repati to MIS-. Blourt al once. As regards thst part
Of Tie return which referred TO Mss Blount he should
have to ask for postp1nemeut, that Mr. Hancke
have opportunity to esrG the fscs and prepare re-
turn a. full and explicit ss the Court req1ued.
MI Rsrsom said all ttey desired was the facts MIR.
Huncke knew Of his own krowedgs.
Judge Ogden decided that the return must be
amended At oLce hE! tie case 90 On to close IS eay
/ < recess of an hour was then taken during which
Juoge Ogden lad an interview with Me-. Blount ;,
Al o'clock MIR. Mulford put in the following sdd-
tiorsl return:
Hidden Comfy s-J,hn Huncke, for further reurn to toe
ssd witt oath saith: That he has the boiy Of the sad
Justice snd that he Is not ean her from hr fai
husbsrd and nrihei bst ne e.nnft & S me p & a'y o ~
Bt csr1e 10 the hotel but thinks about second
came a. De nent wss not nome the te .nd M
Emily j. B.ogLt, oePo en believes, wss "he ~ ms n'a
uLdt he cae saG oou;ro Of her eer solely aud not OF
other pssop aud hsi Re holds her ai mother olnabe to
depo ent fr thu board Of her said dsushts for toe term
ne IVES al deroreuts house; and that she let de
pouents bouse without his hnowleds., dlieen2n of
procure meI and that ne does not kno" wn whom sne i-it
hsre she goiug where she be found thai
he dos ot d.tn her lro,n The Gus ody father sud ma tits
p In hs power TO produce her he commanded BY said writ
and be has detained them or either OF then bl on
the contrary they bry whenever they :aF
pI Ala this ponent aliher ss tia, Hend de Risiee
ladies' derouen csnuo, s he s' now gone away
S"pd depneIt clnnot say; that petitioner Frederick s.
Blunt STAYED de poDeu hou. Sunday night and be
could have stayed Longer ne had seen g6hS II % fairScKg
Affixed to TIE ietuIl was the usual urst
MI Whiting said that, upon the facts as alleged IN
the return they should prep traverse TO be servd
upon Mr.. Muoid tais morning. Issue benz Jolned'
the case will be heard upon proofs on Thurstay next
Durirg the recess Er. Ransom, as counsel for Col.
Blomt gave notice to Mr.. HuIcke that Gel. Bcuot
would not only not be responsible f)r Mrs Boun:s
e1perses at tue Napoleon HO.e, but that he should
/ hold Mr. HuLcke responsible ia dansSes II be hsr-
boredte
Tnis brought up the question before the Court 81 70
the custody o MIs. BlouLt pending toe procsedlng.
Interviews were had between Mrs. Blount, MIR. Hal
ftld ard Judge Oscer. Col. Blou1t asked for an or
/ der 10 have Mrs Boun, 90 10 New York. This Jadge
Ogden refused and tfe matter vas q, last cded by
the Judge ode'irg that she remain q. the Napoleon
Hotel for the present.
AT / O'Clock Yesterday en- attachment Issued
out of TIE Circuit Court of Hudson County, New
jersey, 10 hessrs. Ransom and Brown, attorneys,
sRainst the goods snd chgttels Of HerTi DE Ryere,
at the suit Of Mr.. Polite Collns OF Mobile, As6anla
/ 10 recover an Indebtedness Of 500. Deputy saern
Francis proceeded TO the Napoleon House, and when
his business announced and his autho iiy shown,
be was conducted 10 rooms Noe. III snd l3 wnca
were occupied by De Ryiere They then attsched
the following personal property Two trunks and con-
d. Lws,f