New-York daily tribune., 1858-04-20
LAW LNZ'ELLl ENCfE
THE UNION BANK DEFALCATION-MOTION
TO DISCHARGE MOTT FROM ARREST
NE coURr-srEeI.L rrnn-AraIL ls.-Bsfore Judge

sUPREME coURT-srEcI.L rrRN-APRrL ls-Befors Judge
DAVIES.
The Union Bank sgt. jacob II. Mott.
The defendant in fb' case has be- n heretofore ar
e,t.d and held to bsil in the cum of d Al OoO by VIZ
'ue az order Of of the Justices OF TINS Court
motiOr m-de before the 80 ne Justice 10 va
cate tie Der if not vacated TO reduce the amount
o. tail. After full argument both branches OF The
molten were denied This motion was based upon the
off avs which the defendant was arrested, with-
out any sffiGavi's on lis part.
sin liar motion is now made on An affidavit OF the
defendant AID which is met by sfidavs on the part
of the plaintiff
Giahsrn al d T.. ". Sioughton for defendants, JOhn
Foot aid S. A. Foot Tor plaintiff.
DAVIES J.-ghe new matter presepted on tnb mo-
h found affidavit OF tho defendant the ehannaion
hr p.n aud the change which in the form Of
the since the original order ws granted ice eh1
f arrested shows certainly that the matters sisted
IN that affidavit though affirmed to PtiNey we[e asse' b o"
Lrs III. necessary TO state the source o. inor ma''n Sn
s.,ss stated b. iLrmiiion snd the ahoa.
end the eAsnration before The Recorder t1sen ,b
ns, cricsp ot SIR Justice Aach,ll in Moore Vs. C.yer
% "a And the stood before alone on that shda
viz nd 'houd fee tny duty 70 di'caA &c e 'e
i'ndsDt. ,.,-, ,.-.. .s;s..i, ~ NJ, Arthur hs
sw,a .ltyrly and obi' own know edge - tes %
or obr s.sp 70 the defendant q is mSnsy
I'm, md 70 the .moun, Of the ndsb,-dnss Of tef-nd,ns
20 zoe @ 4. whether upon the whole the DE- efsni
sni .bord Re bal 10 other words should an o,d,T
ana Gle .ry BY Harris Ju.,. in Cn'pia at
sc,x IS How 4So At page 1875 he ssys; ua9sf''ena
~ rvi,Lt Il the q and Sh SECTIONS Of TOE Code ta1
qu.ion uItn every motor is- hi, y w5s.n. IPon & ts
Vide cst. a. n by the sdsyt oE 6nt1 sses the ool,
c.ed upou act upon the Application a ye. no.a ~. 80
P,i1 h- uls b. lsplrd But ater hearing oon pt.s
the o .,ioo should sppear that cee ~ snss nt1 &
lds cut The erder 'h.ad BE- y,e.tse ~ so a., ARA.
,ri. II How o. cs.,, then cited Csdy rfs''asn A 's
FGu ~ g y How. 1877 n,..s.., Tb..
Via, AZ, the facts a. presented BY The Lh,'
~, ar .ccouh. in th- tniou B.0k from Jan J.
t.o 10 Peb lgS3 in the OF Osrfet Si'U NJ
.frsiTa hat
,.,od stresad there crssn out on seeh ehcfe
a. "a G ~ b.n sscepo;sd and than -" entered IN tne
depo-it-bs ty ths receiving etI VIC 80 40 p,.,s
~ 10 l.. the oil the ceposf' rroei'ea - 70
o. IN. led. uins lbe accounts OF tho dsirnest
h be aus krt by Brobeion IL APPEAR. inst IN tHe sas.r
b- c-ro-ts Of the drtenosh. WI ns, Ths .,.,n.rt ~
80. 49,. I'D. inevitable cusion OF the CON Pci
be .pd.nt 9th sr;heon ia rrsnce 70 thss entries sna
deposits ffE1cc
.b of Oc.o 1896 the defs-d,n. opened sseOunt
In Ii. own The bslS and from that tame 70 htcn 10
Its he S,e, out Of bank and there paid 10 hin h
% heL- rhe Of 81 60 than h- DIP sted The
theL increased TO this by false and fraudulent en
su.ce ledger BY BfotheIson aud imp s.to1e 10
doutt TIA. the cesneAi Nso Ao"eote VI '1oH An
crease. =. ,,, r.,--. n
TIE eeLdsIt and which are clearly II 8, o
I of Ms brObeon. Soc shows 10 contradiction of
b ,,u.tt made by the defeudsut rs be aud Brheson
w,e "a udTr,be D.iniacy snd had business ecn
n ncou Do ib- with the aqgsnance whirh the detufau,
.., b. bsd win him arrive az toese conclusions irrsp-os
a ,bes eclsra,,n Of Biotheson testified % By bic VIE
ohiect.d 20 tie EFT that should eNnas
vttr tb- ourdstion 10 d BY proof sufficient pHs s 70 e.
tabiyh the fat Of sprscy 20 Do uniawfal ac =
the sut dec srsiops Il each a the pArts ~
,uce tbe former ob.c' in p.usuce OF thr az
tL@u o. therefor ofSios eyitencss sSan ,h 40
n Greet: V. T.. Sec. III. And TIE same sa'eof "J