The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1858-06-30
je2S-1aw4w
HE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BAL

y.
and others.
in THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BAL
Ill TlMoRE CITY.--May Term, 1s5s-The original Bill
IN this case filed by the compliments William Wood
VILE and others, creditors of Reed, Eason Company
ana OF ezckah Easton, to have sold for satisfaction Of
their said debts and claims real property situate
company iands ana parts OF tracts called Frederick
stadt' and smiths Forest" 1t charges that Seth Reed
mortgaged the said property May 18TH 1856 to Levi
EStoh 10 secure an alleged Indebtedness of 100000
also to the said Levi Ea>ton September l7h 1856 To
secure an alleged Indebtedness So COO that on Decem
Der 18th, 1856, the said Levi Easton received an ASSIGN
ment of mortgage of 81 5sO7 upon the same property
executed to certain Camillus Kider September 10th
1856, and by him assigned to said ev Faston. hat
SAID Lew Eason received the said mortgages and assign
ment as and for part Of the Reed Easton Co
and that the companants through their Equities as set
out in the Bill entitled to the benefit and advantage
thereof as creditors of said firm
1t further charges the execution Of the other mortgages
prior in date to these herein upon the said premises
or part or parts thereof the executed by said Seth
iced IN favor of certain David Reed of Boston Massa
chusetts October llth, 1915 secure payment of
note OF Seth Reed of the amount of 81 O5 7G dated April
l2th 1915 payable three years after date and the other
mortgage executed by said Seth Reed 9th 1852 to
secure payment of roe of Sal to a certain Augustus
Price and Camilus Kidder of Baltimore; but whether
either or both of said last named mortgages is or are vet
due and unsatised whether the intended to he
secured thereby have not been paid the companant say
they have no means Of knowledge though they presume
from the lapse of time that they have both been satisfied
The Bill asks that the compliments he substituted to
the rights of Levi EaSton under the mortgages first
named and that the parties answer the allroaon If tL
Bill, and especially that David Reed Camius Kidder and
Augustus NJ Price whether the mortgages stand
ing IN their names aforesaid have been duly salts
he'd and paid and what the consideration of each
thereof and out of what transaction transactions they
arose and that the mOrtgaged premises sold for the
benefit of the compliments and that further relief NAV be
granted to them.
All of the parties to the said Bill defendants having
duly appeared by their solicitors and all them except
David Reed and Seth Reed, having filed their answers
respectively, the cOmplanants filed their amended Bill to
the present May Term of the Court alleging they had
been informed that the mortgage executed
to David Reed claimed to have been transferred on or
about the 9Th of January 1852 to certain John Il Toni
min and William Henry St John and SOphia ST Inhn-
wife of Samuel st. john Junior or that they claimed
some interest therein and further alleging that said mort
has been fully paid and satisfied and that no inter
est whatever passed to said TOumin or the said William
H. and Sophia j. St John, by pretended assignment
and that the said parties have said prem
lses and that the compliments entitled the
same solo, and to receive the proceeds thereof without
or hndrance of said TOulmn and said William H. and
SOPHIA j. st John, of them, any their parci
patton in the said proceeds; and praying said parties
together with Samuel st. john Junior may answer the
said amended and original Bills and that the complain.
ants may have the said property sold and receive the
proceeds, and alleging that said defendants
dents and praying order Of publication against them
1t is thereupon this fifth day Of June 1888 adiudged
ana ordered that the compliments by causing copy
TINS odertn be inserted in some newspaper published in
the city of Baltimore in each successive
weeks before the seventh day July next give notice to
the said John b. Toumin William Henry St John Sam
ue St John, Junior, and Sophia j. ST. John, his wife of
the object and substance of the said original and amended
Bls and warn them to appear in this Court in person
by solicitor before the ninth day of October next to
answer the premises and show cause if any they have
why decree ought not to pass prayed
WM GEO. KREBS.
je8-1aw4 True copy Test WM H. II. TURNER CI'k