New-York daily tribune., 1858-12-11

rr 90 ls NSi - he rtoi q c. ~ ,c4tse % teb ossa1
A :, s,..,.. 4 - Cor wsit. ~ e,s., s'e' s',
.srd fae c1nciief tka' 20 isn't 30. lssu~ ~
h-, $50 no m ss ll scncs Of 81. s-N hssn P.y
Ts,s .e,, .,a;a,.ry rs-. s,asrra upoa tsi, Cont,
AZ es ekrresd ' poated o-s CT Il ts' pro
y,a. A,aors, - ..,r, 50, ia. ~ ,ocrsoA stsv
claim d.. rizt A ies' no' c-ss an are'try
So iAe ''-' rs ''-.s . I. u aa = . 81 % "a
prei T., stssv o. ncsii' proving the d,aeaa e.s
4 c.si sc,'t. .GishaH.. Prss,'-r. -, q sditoal
Sta TAe ,ssute oonte~Ps,ss the es-s Of toe sass-A
isc ia: he 1 ;ho S. ot .s.t ss.i.~s
ccrss ens L,l sa .'0se euJ as.'.ea Ia P.P-s.-l
Iev,rsPtfs
Aat.ory McR.yn,A.. Ac. at. b. p. Sherman
c, noiicn deuird. wi.h - oo.;.
'ichh Hoy ast. ih..s. kiru.y = al An ekra al
irw.ror ~ -''- o Nr cuyer I'D s-N - ~ Law afft'.
F-rd,IioS J. tosar', sc, sst. frisbi, S'.-M-
ton gra.-,,e ~ it1ot co't' % s.th,r qs-ty.
Az. Go-s s-'. G,~. ". C)nk,y & ALL otion i-
l.ls y = C. Coftsfo tifh. party.
CISertr Dc. 10 -6,!oie ysAs- l,e-,n,~.
FOrlbH TRIAL oy NiCHNEi. cAN,ssl- fHISp DAY.
TIE Ps,p,, 1T Ml,b4rl Csuc-a,.
TIE p al ~ ilis cs>, coutilgcl az 0 cok THE
mofnrs ord the prosecution rc,toi tLciF Abost
roor. Mr.. Edmon Baallnan, The asssSn.d counsel
or the prisoner said tie ieicnse would foscgo any
operh rnlslks, bu; woal proceed at oecc WITH thu
cxeui4 at, II their w,oesSes. Anuafia Amens, tho
mistress of Cancemi eNa n.Ged II len,th HS
e nmory, wei - the testimony OF tho other cit
n,s-s, unmpostsut, It a repetition OF wast
Tie pubic r aneajy familiar w.,A. The cise will 10"
eupy shout ovc Gsy more.
srrcin Iena.-D,c. l'-Bsssre Jalsc D-uys.
DIVORCE CASE.
ss-shH MGiAer, BY her acSi fiend. John v M6rr.
The psrte> - tnls sat acre maried ia n city On
the l2th 4 september, Sio. roey contirucj & 1.-Two
together un.il November l,lpT1ny, when plaintiff l.t
him. th, reason being, she alleges, chat he pirsuet
o coars. of il-D,atn' 1t toward her. Ga the "a nj
Jaruary, l>S. Is commenced suit against her ia tho
Sipremc Com. tor divorce q rinc,'c Dta'rIm,ssL
>ucs' qrcny, she es's hc secretly cit t's STATE and
went to lud.ana, where, Ster rcscing ono year, hs
filed hi, h.l auS oHt,'ntd divorce from her. la
November, l>J2, ho returned, aoi It appears that
since the decree Of dvorco of the Court Of Indiana IA
married woman ramsj sarah Cwnahsu.
The plaintiff now sue, for divorce a riHcn'0, aNsy-
irg that he has committed alultcry with sad S,rsh
earn than, aud that the sooond marriage was bigam,s
ald III, gal. Til WAS rcfrref to rcioce To tako
testimony, and to-day tried upon the issue boz
fore Jndse Dawes, ~ho reser'et his decia.on
COURT OF COMMON rLEAs-s,scr.. rrsN-Doe IA
b..3rc Judge hR>ON.
No'Kr stANDSa c,sE--Gnr III RrstLrs OF
QrAREEfING.
James Fiaay.,a 's, joan Nynok JOHN kynoc at J'm-s
stuaY-en
These are cross suits for slarlor. 1t spp'srs thaa
in September last fMlayson aud kyu0ck had disa-
grcemeut IN the housc 81 Mr. fInayson, nish whom
kynock boarded. IT, the ct their ei-rrel they
abused each ether 10 such i, ,rte thSt Fiu,sysoa
commenced an action against hs adversary for s,an-
der. An oiier # arrest granite and hynock wac
corsgncd t. the rho.pable cells of the cousty jail.
While there co. tatipl an the pocluites and uncer.
tautes of The law, he came tV the determination u
su,iug his opponent.
The action was commenced, aud in default ot tho
required bail, fnlay was also incArc1rated within
the dungeon walls 81 be provided for at the expense
OF the county Bat prsop faro and the deprivation cf
n, blessings Of liberty set them % thinking, and no
doubt thor conclusions were that they hal MT made
much progress IN recOycringo sustaining their rSs,
and on ccnseut OF Mr. hyaook, HIS attorney moved
that both ot them b. discharged, which was opposed
by the attorney for Mr. fill'ys)n.
Ihs morning the Judge made an order dcnyns tho
motion without cvrts, but reduced their bail IrcR
- 900 60 $500.
Geo. Ttr,iigcr for Kynock, c. Patterson for Fin.
lsysou.
TgtAL TfRN-B,tofe Judge liiLros.
HEAVY VERDICT AGAINST rHE CITr.
Pctssso8 egt The Mayor A..
This ia IA od ease, having been tIici before. Itis
IN action 10 recover compensation TOR plans AMI spc-
clfcationI fcr rebuilding Washington Market ia lsIi.
II was tr.d before Judge Issrshsn in 1913. and ths
plaintiff was nOnsuted unGcr The provisions Of too
then existing charter Plaintif carried the case to
the Court 81 Appeals, which reversed Judge iu<rs-
ham's ruitg. Ia tho present trial the jay ouni o
verdict fer piiintn for si,357 with ~ per cent
that sun ~ eX'ra aloSance.
Mossrs. Bray ard Holmes ior plaintiG; Richard
Bustet for defendants.