New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-10-23
II no. fully prrs r:ei IN m record maze IN n N.Y.
r-.2v d !. ~ D. In por.an, q en- llle ], % o.

et faey Lad not been returned mish, have ben br,
u O'. ~ 60. 80 - h. 10 good -e,.oa WIN Re- f, =,
ley nav not far o. they disclose AS vi h ut
s.sisnss 49, 80 ~ - 80 fsof $500 20 ~, !.
sen> thee natter, resardee q. fshors re recor
would b. ground o which cor,rsiiets The rc-ri n
that VIEW 81 ll~ return l.
in IL H. case ~ or tA. .4biee. ", - ,,...
fec ~ that the matters o. .tlon nehe. u tie ecor.
IN tAF ease are NOR than hrA .lrri h. .ha ,--
e. y iact AID b. rrai effect ra otie 20 indictment.
1 ur. RUN I'd = tls cont much that rofr. /,
ote rart f the poceedinss The orier O. be r,i
ep Gel Tern, granted toe motion - All he
f. srr III. ODE r. H. b III =, " 10 . s. : b.
logged TO IT, Genera Term. Ie,eiees vaa thee ".
tel, wcre annexed as added 10 the recori and 5.-Sy b
rert Of E They Hrsi b. treated therefore. If iley
ieIted m tie hcy OF hc record ard b. considered IN con
which are al sed In tbs view tie certificate thi me Of the
jurors va withtawn Is part Of h pil sni qualities
AID basis exists for the position q he deendan IL error
a three ustels coniaG tLo record The record originally
made up u tie cetTt below atd % 'lpene'a matters
court shows .ha ahonsh Ae petit jury VIXEN ht enpsn
drawn AID hc una Poeeeeed with ana he 'eFde wa .en'
deed BY OILY c.cy 40 no ircon.,teny l Z appears The
In. on ty yeri.c Of eleven jror. although be- con.
and requested ia The pog'. Of e tai tat ore Of The
proceed WITH eleven JUROR was legal j.. therefore rp'a the
ac,s before The cart IL ,e case af IL nay vel l receive
plaintiff will not be necessary to examine any OF W
+, coueded on tie part the people, aud i very les thai
nm L,vr been tried by eleven Jurors esal Jury according
.. rr law, consists Of twelve persons; e Hale P. C. 6i.
/ chit. Grim. L. 5e5 Bae Al. III. Jur~s a, Bennett
Hearas LEADING Cases :; our Constitution, ar sec de-
carrs that the trial BY Jlry il 81 IN which has here
tofore u-ed shall remain irvoe forever and the Re-
tia. tie twelve r- jurors 10 sha app being called,
sud beapfoged different mall constitute the Juy T. r.
Bstiti.in,ea thai Tue rr,f in sr5g might waive hi,
right ts by jury Of twelve person. aad that having
done 80 the grail an IL ~; cas- see NaHa re
u,t
., b. .ld decided in the lsh Of principle and such
ansiogic. as rpor.ei decisions alori.
There j. obviously wide aud important distinction Le weeu
civil ,, md criminal prosecutions as % tine eslrgh Of
defendant wave strict substantial adherence TO he esb
shed A. story md common IA" iode ana ius
OF Judicial proceedings Thu Distinction srs-, ifon me great
h he Of such in respect % The Interests
involved sud the objects to be aocomP i;hed
C, suit. relate aud Affect 20 the parties asaEs. nom
they are brought only individual rights which within their
mr., m" dcisp II .ch s i The nforcenen, Of merely r
yate Obligations duties. Any depart e on legal re in
therefore voluntary renqu ment a. VIA, belongs 70 The de-
PENDANTS exclusively and hence there manii.'; popsyi n
In most cases matters within the lugaict Of the Courts
Tic law does auz the doctrine g. waiver great extent
In some instances even. to the seprivaon Of utiona p
The Roei e..er ,r,,e R'iIrcad comreny 10 HI -
b.. Z y. even settled that in civil go rn will nat - rfsy
l-diltion Of thc spb natter ard where such urdictlo
tA sse by consent Of the mcde 4 proceeding may be
into mere .rb,rs.ir Ia ar ps,i WI iai
S' eaisI aet hcdhee l9il II Dedercks Admin az R'h:
AID thr ialcsnets mode ct is rroceetin not within the
power q" e Da. u wss deemed necessary 70 insert ia our
pre-. NJ constitution provision that Jury tral may be
waived by the pae. all civil cases IL the narnet
by law. t. authorize even IT, Lresau'c t. Confer sa. 20
organic law. that, without such provision tnc ta ~
jury in where it had Heretofore been u'ed, could LOT De
Criminal prosecutions involve public wrcns,"s breach and
yioson OF pul rights and dus-wich affect the whole
capac.y' % b. Com. T. ID - The end they have in
view 10 the yeyeutien If similar oense
Tor i'm
ailments. for The enforcement OF which they to the
100 r no or Iss, ribt by his own i,n,arv a.. 70 .pr
III. liberty part with bis life The s5ae-the public
lives OF the citizens I'd win allow them be taken away
will ut dae process o. law tcoas, ar l. sec o. When
prosecutions proceed the assumption Of sch forfeiture
viii b. 20 sustain tAe must be a'cened aud declared as the
law hss prescribed bacAsShe fo-Lme t. page ~ SAYS
The king iueres, IN he preservation Of ,u his sub
medc doSs,on p The sfa, Creator caaao e
y b. iIocd u destroy ed by any individual neither By tue
m or their own authority Thse coa4idelf,us make Il az
,sn, tl,t he t If defer az, IN o criminal rosesu' Ion .
6aert by consent conduct Of The should be ch more
limited than in civil actions. l. should Tot De- permitted 70
Kterd So far as % work radical clangs great and lead
t ITosons a. to tie orsaailsoA Of lie tribunals
mode % poeesains presei1Sa Y ne oons'h'.on aaa
Ia many particulars AID tue 'aw does, M respect 70 various
matters regard aid 80 apon Dc valid Objections 20 Jurors
may he waived tie Court may be substituted fo ;rers to
dispose Of ohal ges 20 rors secondary "a pae 81 Pnai{
evidence nay BE- fecei'eli adii,'1 r. "a - e w ~
IL similar Particulars, as wen as III feia'on g n'fr 'O'l' Pc
csed - generally will valid what without II
would be- ,Tr0usous. 4 Plea 81 guilty. g nv ~ L. "a
eversy be- th l.dc othe crime vii b. received a.4
rpo Il made clearly app that .le azure and effect Of
Il are uud, cod BY the accused In '.h ces tAe piem
ban, investigation OF Grand Jury. with the admission Of the
accusation IL tie Indictment Is SUPPOSED % De 'ahceA
slfes The pablo Interests But when Issue joined
uron indictment tar thai must De- ~ me tbulal ana
il, the mode which Tue Constitution aud laws provide withot
any ess.u;ai change Tie pDbt IL ~ pros ting iof ne
cope La. Authority 10 consent 70 such change ao' las he
Atyirs the reasoning the present case the con.
ous6n necc-.ary follows that the consent o the pAtn u
rsor to HLdrava! Of juror Ad that tue renalnAs
eleven might render verdict could not t"dy o. I'fn"'
h., 3D. ,rt AZ the m , aud was O uuy II deficiency u
one rcr ct be we'd there appears O. De- no good reason
why Deficiency OF eleven might not be- AID u oinou 70
say why upon tie prime pie the entire panel sl' ho-
o u. Lisl dang rous innovation. n reference 20 Grim
nal sses upon tue aud invaluable institution OF ira BY
Jry, and the Consult non a. 4 a -. - 49,,
MOD. Of tIia, for ne Court ~ aiN % aly - So ,Vti
I'll panel Of Jurors; aud So think ouga not 20 De
The opinion o tie Judges Of the Count Ct kngs Bench IN
tic oi Lord Dacft tried the re- Of h,Ny os
ea.ou strongly foTtihe' The conclusion ABOVE WI"
question In thai wa. whether the prisoner might wave
trial ty he Ieer- and Be tFto ny tit l"Nnt
agreed ila lie could not for TIE statute ~ Magma marta was
IN the negative, aud the proecuton was {" lhr hihss '
lKelyns, Reports ta) Woodeson, in his Lecture vol J.
si6 ,ay. lie .ar was again resolved he fauneut %
Lnd Audey seventh Of the reign ol thar' l. ana
a lie reason Wa tha, lie mode of trial not properly
',f n - ii, rs rart If the Indispensable lsw 4 ne
and Ike the trial BY comnonrs enacted OF
az H.. Nsgna Chsua In 5 Inst 50. the doctrine Is
cannot waive III tra Dy h's peer aN
pu upon tie tlial OF the country tli' - % -
hoders tor of Magma Clas that he mus De- ~
xcy rgr,s Al 20 resolved In Lord nacrcs case
- unnecessary % pursue this discussion -tiel sNu
main. only add the result Of the foregoing ,a
opinion II tne Court the judgment t9" 'io'a "
AID new tria! ordered.
SUPREME COURT-Clscvrr-Ocr. @l.-sefors Judge
BALCOY.
John 4. Van Buskk ard Rufus Mad a9t James Mar
Action To recover fOr defendant falsely -hl .lu.-
cuty IePF eInE o. plaintiffs nat lsaac li-iIs W. ~ b.
Eeyed the representations be made we're tr-' Ia" -