Arkansas true Democrat., 1858-05-18
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAs
 January Term, 1858.

No. z. UOSSlt et el FS heht eJ at-a ppcdt from Hempstad iu Chaneery. Affirmed. Opin- ion per English, c. J.
 No. '. Mayors ct al.-vs Byrne ct al.-Ap- peal from Sebastian in Chancery. Affirmed. Opinion per English C.. J.
 No. g. Horn vs Foster.--Error to Washing ton. Affirmed. Opinion per Hanly, J.
 No To Gray vs Adams.-Appeal from Phillips. Affirmed Opinion per English, (. J. No H. Frelson vs Green, ad Error to Phillips. Reversed. Opinion by English, C.J. No. l2. Maratt vs Scantland, ad.-Appeal from Phillips in Chancery Affirmed. Opinion by Compton, special Judge.
 No. B. Wassel vs Trapnall adx.-Appeal from Pulaski. Affirmed. Opinion by English, C.J.
 No. If. Aldermen, &c., of Helena, vs Bis COG ct al-Error to Phillips. Affirmed. Opin- ion by Scott J.
 No. 15. Norris ct al. vs Norton-Appeal from Sebastian. Affirmed. Opinion by Scott, J. No. 17. Walker as ad vs Byers.--Error to h. dependence Reversed. Opinion by Scott. J. No IS. Read ct a vs Krkwood ct al.-Ap- peal from Lawrence. Reversed. Opinion by English, c. J.
 No. 2l Boyd exr. vs Whitfeld.-Appeal from Lafayette in ChaDcery. Affirmed. Opin- ion by English, c. J.
 No 24 Henderson ct al. vs. Martin ct al.- Appeal from Pulaski. Reversed. Opinion by Scott, J.
 No. 28 Howell vs Howell.--Appeal from Pope. Affirmed. Opinion by Scott, J.
 No. % Ellis ct al. vs. Clarke ct al.-Appeal from Phillips. Affirmed Opinion by Scott, J. No. 31. State vs County Court of Crittendan county.-Appeal from Crittenden. Affirmed. Opinion by Compton, Special Judge.
 Nn StyiF plr tO ra ford. Reversed. Opinion by English, c. J.
 No. 34--Auderson vs Duun.-Appeal from Union. Affirmed Opinion by English, C. J. No. 35.-Viser vs Bertrand-Error to Pulas- Ri. Affirmed Opinion by Compton, Special Judge.
 No. 37. Barnard ct al. vs Lafayette county Appeal from Lafayette. Reversed. Opinion by Compton, Special Judge.
 No. 42. Rheubottom ct a. vs Sadler, exr.- Appeal from Johnson. Affirmed. Opinion by English, c. J.
 No A Mcdaniel ad vs Parks.-Appeal peal from Hempstead. Affirmed. Opinion by English, c. J.
 No. 45. Beller vs Block.-Appeal from Hampstead. Affirmed. Opinion by English, CJ.
 No. 47. Morine vs Wilson ad.-Appeal from Monroe in Chancery. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No. 1T. Cheek ct all vs Pugh.-Appeal from Crittenden. Affirmed. Opinion by English, c. J.
 No 49 Sturdy ct al vs Jacoway-Appeal from Yell Affirmed. Opinioh by Scott, J.
 No 50. McDanel ad. ct al. vs. Crosby, ct al Appeal from Hampstead. Affirmed. Opn- ion by Hanly, J.
 No. 51. Hartman ct al. vs Stone.--Error to Desha Reversed. Opinion by English, C. J.
 No. s. Overton vs Bevers-Error to Saline Affirmed. Opinion by Hanly, J.
 No 54. Bob, (negro) vs Powers.-Appeal from Yell Reversed Opinion by Hanly, J.
 No. 59. Hill ct al. vs Bush.--Appeal from Savier in CAancery. Affirmed. Opinion by Hauly, J.
 No. G. Gary vs Stevenson ct al.-Appeal from Crawford in Chancery. Affirmed. Opn- ion by Scott, J
 No. 68. Galloway vs. Robinson, ct aL-Ap- peal from Pulaski. Reversed. Opinion by Hauly, J.
 No 72 Wilcox vs Boothe.-Error to Sabas- tianr Affirmed Opinion by English, c. J.
 No. 16. Carleton Surv. vs Neal'-Error to Union. Affirmed. Opinion by Scott, J. Phillips Affirmed Opinion by Kanly, J.
 No 81 The State vs Mills-Appsal from Franklin Reversed. Opinion by English, c. J.
 No. s. Rheubottom, ct al. vs Sadler, ct al. Error to Johnson Affirmed. Opinion by English, C.. J.
 No. 65. Guest vs The State-Appeal from Hot Springs Affirmed. Opinion by Compton, Special J.
 No. 90 Moss, ad. vs Smith.-Appeal from Van Buren. Affirmed Opinion by English, C. J.
 No. IF. Cox Ex parte.-Appeal from Hemp stead. Affirmed. Opinion by English, c. J. No. 129. Sullivan, ad. vs Deadman.-Er- TOT to Arkansas. Reversed Opinion by Scott, J.
 No. 129. Jovner vs Turner as-Appeal from Johnson. Reversed. Opinion by Eng fish, C. J.
 No. 133. Ferguson ct al vs More ct al.- Appeal from Independeuce in Chancery. Re- versed Opinion by Scott, J.
 No. 134. Pool ct al. vs s. B. Thos P Ray Error to Independence. Reversed. Opinion by English c. J.
 No. l35. Case vs Mafit ct al-Error to h. dependence. Reversed. Opinion by English c. J.
 Nos. 142 and l843. Brooks ct al. vs Bvers. Error to Jackson. Affirmed. Opinion by En- glish c. J.
 No. 144 Brooks ct al. vs Fassitt. Error to Jackson. Affirmed. Opinion by English, C. J.
 No. 147. Null vs s. B. Thos. P. Ray.-Ap- peal from Independence. Reversed. Opinion by English, Q. J.
 Nos. 156, :, s, g. McCuen vs The State.-- f cases-Appeal from Phillips. All affirmed Opinion by English. c. J.
 No. l62. Hicks ct al vs Lusk ct al.-Error to Pulaski Affirmed. Opinion by English c. No. 172 State vs Nail ct al-Appeal from Benton. Affirmed. Opinion by English, c. J. No. ll3. State vs Harrison.-A ppeal from NashluSton Reversed. Opinion by English, IT. State vs ColIins.--Appeal from Craw- 1ord: Reversed. Opinion by Hanly, J.
 No. l'9. Golden vs The State. Appeal from Randolph. Reversed Opinions by Hauly and Scott.
 No. 1Ss. The State vs Cadle. Appeal from Pulaski. Affirmed. Opinion by by Hanly, J. No. 2Oo. Manees vs Merrill & Brother Error to Drew. Reversed. Opinion by En- glish, C. J.
 from Lawrence. Affirmed. Opinion by En- glish, c. J.
 No. 2lo Statevs Horn.-Appeal from Law renee. Reversed. Opinion by English, c. J. No. 2lI. Hallyburton vs Robinson ct al.-- Error to Arkansas. Affirmed. Opinion by En gtsh, c. J.
 No. 2lS: Kirkpatrick vs sewart-Error to Ashley Reversed. Opinion by Hanly, J.
 No. 225. Hicks vs Maness-Appeal from Columbia Reversed. Opinion by Hauly, J.
 Foreign News.