New-York daily tribune., 1858-07-02
y H. Flag, but a. to the PEOPLE. He asa asd TIA,

70 HI FfagR, but a. 10 the people. Hs as y7sd tia,
veud be difficult 10 determine whss right the pso
., .ne sts.e had 10 the esee even suppOtns tss
nsc no aasbo,ity TO behind tho Lsgss'ive p)wers
81 abe Common Council.
The Ju5ge observed that the point required exs 1in
asn although the righ. Of the people 10 interfere
vas snbar ~ that 0f the Crown, which wss fre-
Snensiy ezercifsd In Easlsnd. Subsequently Nr.
Ncye. moved TO disnniss the complaint the grouod
hat cid not state sufficient TO msntsin an action
And pardinE sho argument thereon the Court ad.
Jouned.
HcsissEas-Besore Judge srTs.RLuo.
iFJutcT1o. AGAINST POsThAsrsk FOWLER.
Jone- W~per eat f-s> v. Fowler.
On the application OF ex Judge Beebe, an irdt,e tioa
krwarong 70 the General Post Cfiice at W.stingtoo
spy letteJs Communications addressed te Dr. r.
Mrnet. - Co.; ALEC eel oiaing bim, his secats J.,
from opening or reading tho same. l. spr ssIs tia:
eert ior an illegrimste purpose. DR.. Eonett and
yfai1ti9 are partners in this city. Horss.o n. Wild
Spd samea u. Warner became sure'ies W the under
fskzg is the sum Of q, go each.
nttREsTisG QUESTIONS or LAW ASr sIcE POINTS
OF PRACTICE.
James w. Psi,e a Go. at l. o. wsoon 50
The giantiHs tpcluding Samuel A. Applstoa,
H,rusps G. kicfar xs Abbott LawcDce ) compose the
sp q large Boon se and the dsfendsss extensive
s:i:ss:S,. & os:esr last s.ias ss
St..a1o he sScs an ssS.ssa Va. .sod, II ~,a .ss
.,;sS.s % % % pr. S ss R.a & sa' tsn, .s'S !: Po.
ksfs Toe oonpsot asges that a. dteoos1's bf@ten 70
sks nert and prsfor cetsn crsonrr bsfoe the
PLAINTIFF ash that keeever be sppn.ed TIA. the property DC
eirued that creoitos the .ine OF tse
esron receive estef sha- tssn the psata and for
On ip coD yeseDtns hem from sskios ssg1m-nt
sshr dispoon cf The property owned by the 6rm d u WI
Co Ia Octob 1857 The thereof" Judge Sh-r
Sd sssed the Injunction and served s The d.
t osD before 1cock Bh Dit 0tey woeh eod Oh The
tho dsepcants setting under advice OF ths
s, james Brady ESQ executed general assignment to
Baes HieD pyerps them for Ds1e oy ths A.
l. u. Wilson poerDs al those who had
become b surety for tho defendants and aterward cstrs
NTH The property their remaining ceditms
9csD Upon the argument, Mr d. D. Field for plAirtss,
missed preliminary objection that the octendaots were IN COZ
kmpt f violation Of the aucilop and tnst hey must
tAnyes Of contempt before they oonld BE- permitted 70
proceed With their motion vac..e the ipunc'on The point
nj. Fisld ~ granting the folso~inz
On foregoing sk3ayte any ahdsvts tbs. be
ssryed y the papfs before the 9Th ss the
jupcion proof OF service thereof j.. the dsrdsnts sbow
not be pm contempt In violating the said injunction
md et Ii dissovc Injunction s.nd the
Day and hour. ; JsiAh etihEhLa AND jns'ice'
July /, is5a
whether partes proceed before Court whose injunction
sy have lated before pubs themselves Of the contempt.
Inoste and Interesting question of whether
nsolvept received extension serwad nske
sssppsDt with such preferences sS to podee those creditors
Dualey fsid and D. D. Field for pi.ass; James T. Brady
Aaron Hesly et al. sst- Conrad Goebel.
The demurrer IL frvOlous aud Judgment for
psds; Gays and no costs Of mston 70
psnintt6S attorney.
ne IN n n A G.f-s y~I