New-York daily tribune., 1858-07-05
LAW LIVIELLIGENCE.
,JOBSON ACT. BENNETT.

yOBsON's FIELD OF EDITORIAL LABOR HAS BEEN
wIDE-BENNETT IN THE PAY OF LORD PAL
MRRsTON As WELL Al LOUIS NApOLEON-
THE HERALD PAwNLU-POETlCM EPIsrLE
FROM JOBSON
This case, for remuneration for editorial labor, was
continued before Justice Fonda Saturday. At the
private request of the Court Mr. JObson gave up his
deadly bowie-knife, and stated tina. he should now
look to the Court fer protection. There had been
several rusus here for the purpose of ssssutng him.
He would however, try 10 bear all brAeting,, for II
was very inconvenent matter to have to go to jail.
Mr.. Jobson recalled. and examined by Mr.. Towns
hend.
the city of New-YcFk beside The Herald? A. Os
yes, sir.
o. Which ones A. For The Courier and Eaqn'-
rer-I have not ssked permission OF any OF them 20
have any object ,n-for The Comsserclal Aduert'ser
The Journal Of Commerce. The Pas,, and The Sun.
q. How were you paid, by the column or f1r your
time A. BY the column.
Q. How much did tbey pay you A. The Wall.
street papers gave me 80 a column The Sen psid
me but - per column; The Post, thought, was to
pay s0 bat they only paid me 81 and as tins was
not equivalent for my serylees therefore oechea
10 write any more for them.
0. Did yoa ever get more than $40 per column from
any paper A. don't think ever did; these we're
81 city matters or articles have got great deal
more thar Sl0-$O even-but not IN this country;
any vsits but written at tune OF leisure, ana
sent in.
Q. Then The Post did rot pay you A. Yes, they
paid me; but 1t was not much as considered the
articles worth, 40 declined writing any more TOT
them. -
.. Did you have any suit with The Posi- A. No,
Sir.
O. Nor with any Of the papers A. No, Sir.
Y. Not with The Tine, a. never wro<e any
thing for The Times Sir.
o. But you have a suit with Tho TINES? A. Yes,
Sir have suit against that paper for Islander.
The Court-At this present time WitaessIfes,
Sir at tnis time they represented that when adver
sed 70 teach certain branch OF surgery 20 any per,
sop that il was for the purpose OF sWBdpg men ana
ssducing women, and for this | have commenced
8 suit sg ainst them for SANDER. .,
O. think you have bssu great deal persec ~ ~
by the pIess, generally have you not A. oon
know that have except BY such papers a. your own,
which are in the pay Of Louis Napoleon Bonsparte'
for the purpose of putting me down: r,o,.uv, A.
Q. DO you know LOUIS Napoleon pefsonaiy %.
NJ ,st sssuredly do have known the ysgso9ho ioi
many wears; have known him when be nsd noI
hail dollar TO get his dinner, and myself sno ny
frerds have often gwen hin enough out OF cna'! "
get his dinner with .o,
don I know; don't know whether III. Times is il
the nav ef the Bond street gang ~ ooth drawers
the psy Of Louis Bopapsrt, the one that your pape
is in the psyof,
O. Do ycu mean that the tooth drawers are in th'
nav of Louis Napoleon A. No, Sir; they are to'
Vile even for him; oh, TO, no know him too well
the man Ia bad enough, but he would not labor VIII
.ols ss vile "a these are.
Q. Does the profession Of dsntistry include toota
drawipgi A. Oh, yes it does, and in speaking thus
sllude to the Bondsnset gang, for there are man!
respectable dentists here. -,
Q. Were you persecuted while In England A. NO
Sir; don't know that l was.
q. Were You not persecuted and obliged to leave
A. Oh no I was In hostility TO the late Government
but don't think was obliged to lesye-not IN an,
degrees could 90 back again TO the Continent or z
England and be welcome from ali classes from Ioyst
s,Hpwafd; was on bad terms with Mr.. Bennetts ei
usc,sd A, master, Lord Pslmerstor, but don thnl
ksnnstt viii get much for Palmsrston is gentleman
4 does not employ s6Smps.
al Were you acquainted With the nobility OF VIZ
-; 'bsrs CT Parliament in Eugsnd' A. An' v
quite nui- Mr. Gladstone didot yos A, ;.s s,s
z; Iou hau Inn rsronsuy-ws not so's"n'"' VIVA