The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1858-06-23
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BAL

LEVI EASTON, HEZEKIAH EASTON, DAVID REED
and others.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BAL
Il TlMORE CITY May Term, lSjS-The original Bill
in this case filed by the compainants William Wood
vile and others, creditors of Reed EaSton Company
and of ezekah Eason have sold for satisfaction Of
their said debts and claims property situate
IN Baltimore county known Lot 10 of the Baltimore
company lands, and parts of tracts called Frederick
Stadt and smiths Forest 1t charges that Seth Reed
mortga%ed the said property May 18th 1856 Levi
Easton to secure an alleged Indebtedness of $4,000 and
also to the said Levi EatOn September 18th 1856 To
secure alleged Indebtedness of $4,000 that on Deem
Der 18TH 1886, the said Levi Eason received an assign
heht oil a mortgage OF S25oO upon the same property,
executed to certain CamIus Kidder on September I6tn
1906 and by him assigned to said Levi Easton; that
said Levi EaSton received the said mortgages and assign
mentS as and Tor part of the assets of Reed EaStOn Co.
and that the compliments, through their Equities
out in the Bill entitled to the benefit and advantage
thereof as creditors of said firm
1t further charges the eXecu the other mortgages
prior III date to these herein stated upon the said premises
or part or parts thereof the executed by said Seth
Iced IN favor OF certain David Reed of Boston, Massa
chlsetts, October llth, 1913, payment
note of Seth Reed of the of 81 05l April
lZth, 1913 payable three after date and the other
mortgage executed by said Seth Reed June 9th 1852 to
secure payment of of S74 to certain Augustus NJ
Price and CamlluS kidder of Baltimore; but whether
either or both of said last named mortgages is
due and unsatiSGed, whether the intended to
secured thereby have not been paid the companans say
they have Of knowledge, though they presume
from the lapse Of time that they have both been satisfied
The Bill asks that the cOmpainants be substituted to
the rights Of Levi Eaton under mortgages first
named and that the parties answer the allegations of the
Bill and especially that David Reed Camius Kiddcr and
Augustus NJ Price answer whether the mortgages stand
ing IN their names aforesaid have been duly salts
fled and paid, and what the consideration of each
thereof and out of what con or transaction they
arose ana that the mOrtgaged premises be sold for the
hene OF the complanans and that further relief may be
granted O them.
All of the parties the said Bill defendants having
duly appeared by their solicitors, and all them except
David Reed and Seth Reed, having filed their answers
respectively the compliments filed their amended Bill
the present May Term of the Court alleging that they had
een informed that the mortgage executed
to David Reed claimed have been transferred on or
about the 9Th of January, 1852 certain John B. Toul-
min and William Henry John Sophia J. St John
wife OF Samuel St John, Junior that they claimed
some interest therein, and further alleging said mort
gage has been fully paid and satisfied and that no inter
est whatever passed to said Toumin the said William
IL anu SopIa St John, by said pretended assignment
ana that the said parties have concern with said prem
lses and that the compliments are entitled to have the
same SOLD and to receive the proceeds thereof without
OF hlhdrince OF said Toulmin and said William H. and
opha j. st John, or any of them, any their partici
pdo IN the SAID proceeds; and praying that said parties
'osether win samuel st. john Junior, may the
sald amended and original Bills. and that the complain
ants may have the said property sold and the
proceeds, and alleging that said defendants resi-
ents ana praying an order of publication against them
thereupOn this fifth day of June, 1855 adjudged
ana ordered that the compliments by causing copy of
this order to be inserted in newspaper published in
the city of Baltimore each of four successive
weeks before the seventh day of July next give notice to
the said John B. TOulmn, William Henry ST. John Sam
uel ST. John, Junior and Sophia j. St john his wife Of
the object and substance of the said original and amended
Bis and warn them to appear in this Court person
by solicitor on or before the ninth day Of October next
answer the premises and show cause any they have
why decree ought not to pass as prayed.
eS-1aw4 True copy. Test: WNI H. H. TURNER CIR