New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-06-24

ton tbFuugl al The t1t-rs.
Thirdly. that whether tire h,iilr sresro "a sctaai
slavery in FREQ Sac mstes ha rec, syains, he
holder he Ualstd states Courts wIl 10, dscite. b.;
vii leave 10 DO dee led by .ae CJu1s o! s1y Slave
Safe the 20 msy be forced in:o by the 10 ss,er
Ills psilt 2 made, 10. 10 be pcessel tn's,d!Gtsy
hut ii acQuesoed ia Ia = vale, and app sesty -
do sd BY the people st 81 elscol, fte 70 sotsi The
losical conclusion, ths, vast D;ed Scots msstsr
u ,ht lsrfuly DO with Drei OF IA ire Free Sts.e
Ct Illinois, every other master may lssfaly DO WITH
sny etber enc o. ORE ttsusGR& slaves, II ll.nIs or
in any other Fgse sac. AuN.1s,y - al ts's, and
w5ihii hand 10 hacc with 4, tle N9o.ashi dsctrle,
opinion, q. leas NOrt}tcs p1bic o3i)a, = Nd. ere
whether slavery IA voted doom o. 80. tbs shows
eSse,ly where erow q-S srd "ta.y, a''' "-iiaeF
~ sTe tending.
IT viii throw additional rsa. OF ths la.sr g ~
back ana mo re n.i1d tie sts.g o. Es.'orieh
facts already stated Several ;hiaSs IA s1o a?peN
less ddrk and .,ysi-r0us thla thoy eit @Ssg they
were trauspEng. Tno people we're - &c lsi. per
fecty free, "sabiscs only to tas cSr'.aa.iS!a,
WAT lie COG,A.illgg hsd 70 do with y ott'lde's
could Mt neq zee. Plainly eaousa E05, II vas an
e1scty fitted Ricke for TIE Dred S,ott decision Ia
aferwsrd come ia, and declare tdA' rTty fsNf'm o.
TIE people 70 be Isl o freedom ~ az Way~s ne
sm.t dn.en., expressly declaring the, light OF toe
people 10 eN 'lude Slavery, N0,et dosa fi1SIy
enough 0 the sdop'ion OF j. would have spo1ei tbs
niche for the Died Scott de,ss'oa. Way Va t9e
Cou.t decisi:n hs.5 upl Way, even S'as'' - lodi
yiius opinion withheld til Gfcr ths Pfesiensis e.
ton Plsinly enough sol', the speski1g out fSes
would have endangered the "prt3cL'y free srgn-
ment upon which the question Wa . 70 CARVED.
Why the oWigoiRg Presidents frhc.tiuon ca tas
Endorsement WY toe delay OF reafglhsnt
Why the incoming Presidents dfr.af ex>ortAti'n IN
favor CT tie dec sion
These tliogs ook Ike the oaut.oas ydt!.gg All p,.
iRg spirited horse. preparatory 10 mounn1s l",
when i ia dreaded that he nay give the nief Ia.
AID why tie ha.ty after ind ,rsensn.sd the jo,son
by the President aad otbers We cannot absolutely
kRo that all these exact adaptations are shs iesah oi
ID - laea trs All nllh
diie1ert portions of which Ne know have been goes
ont st different times and pisces All ~ dlhersn.
workmsn-Siephen, Rankin, X ser Gai INES; ih
rstsnce-snd when va see these ,imoers lphsi 70
getber ANA gee they exactly make the ,sns oia hoas'
or u,l all the lemons and mcftices exactly hnog.
and all the lengths and proportions Of toe different
pieces exactly adapted TO their respective Places AID
Lot a piece too msny OF too few-not omli.1Is even
sca6, ldng-or, j. single place Be lsakhs, 40 can
zee tie place in the frame exactly h.ed All psepiIei
10 vet bring this piece ln-il Sach case We NOD u
impo sible TO not bcltre that S;sphen and traakin
and Roger AID Janes all understood one another trom
the beginning, and al worked upon & common tsaR OF
dyaJt drawn up befc re the FIRE, hex was s.rncs.
/. should Lot be overlooked th.., by the Neb'aska
bill. the people of S'lte as well Ierrg3ry, we're u
be lef. "DTGchy troe," "subjec oaly 81 tie C1nstiN-
ton Why meiGiOn a Siaiel they ware legiss:ing
for Territories AID not for or G3out S.,es Cesainy
the people Of State and pug "a y be subject o the
Constitution OF the United Statssi but why i men
ton OF this mgge4 into this merely Territorial sv
Why are the people OF Territory and .ae psope 81
Si,tr thereia hupei together sai their relation %
the Constitution therein treated 80 oeag Pre'sy tue
same 7 WhiiS the opinion of ne Court Dy tniss
Justice fancy in the bred S;ctt case, and the sspa-
rate opinions Of al the cOncurlg Jadzes, expressly
declare that the Constitution OF The Uaied 9ss'eS
neither permits Congress nor leEInofai Leg nseulo
to exclude Slavery from any Ua.ed SAFES Territory,
they all omit 10 declare whether or rot the same Con-
stluton permits STAT, or the people Of ale, to
exclude II.
Possibly this was mere og',sioH bat wac can bs
oe sure il Mclean or CuTtis had sought " get Toto
the opinion declaration VI uDlimed power IN the
people Of STATE to exclude Slavery from their hns,
Just Chsse and Mace sought TO get such declaration
in behalf of the people ofa Territory into the Nehrssx.
bill ask, who be quite sure that 1t would not
have been voted down in the one case as had bsen
in the other. Tie nearest approach 70 the point of
declaring the power OF State over Slavery - msae
BY Judge Nelson. lie approaches il more than olce,
uspc the precise idea and almost the language OF
the Nebra.ka act. On one occasion his eAac: lin-
guage is Except 10 cases where toe power u re-
" strained by the Constitution OF the Uatcd State-,
the law OF the Stats supreme over the subject OF
Slavery within It's lI.lsdIc,on."
In what cases the power Of the States - 30 re-
strained by the United States COcstatiJn s Ion an
oPen question, precisely as nc s.m9 qnesHVn ss 20
the restraint The power Of the TerrRorHs was LIZ
open in the Nebraska act. Put that and Tea. together,
and we have another nice little niche, vhi3h 70 may,
ere long, zee filed with another supreme Court Do
cs!On, declaring that the Constitution OF tho en'd
States does not permit Sate 10 exclude slavery rom
its mits. And this msy especially Do expected n tne
doetrpe of care lot whether Slavery DO voted d1,r
OF voted up shall gam upon the puohe m'nd sum
GENTLY - give promise th.t such a decision can %
II nntsined when made. Such deomon 70 al thst
Slavery row lacbs Of being alike lawful In all tbs
States. Welcome or unwelcome, sueh dejiSon .
probably coming. and will soon be upon az unis', the
power the present political dypasy shall be met and
OVERTHROW. We shlll lie dorm Pleasantly dreaming
that the people Of Missouri on toe verge oil making
their State free and We shall aigasc 20 the rfa!Ry,
instead, that the Supreme Court has made Hiao" a
Stare State.
To meet and overthrow the power of that dyassy is
the work now before all those who would prevent that
consummation. That is r3G W. have 20 do. But
hOlc can we cest co Il
There are those who deIOunce IA 0pepLg - Their
f.erd- end yet whisper "s sot.iy tina, Senate,
D0ugas 10 the GDsst Estra gent there 10 glsh which
eec. that Object. They d. MT tell us, NOR mas ne
tod US that be sle5 sDy such OBJ 90. 70 5s ehscted
Ttey with us 10 mfr III, nom ths i.cs tlst no now
has little gu ARIEL vita toe ofths 3tdyassy;
and that he hss regularly voted with AS, On single
point upon which he and We Iye osyer differed Tney
mind taat he Is very great nan. ant that the
largest q W are very small Lstths be granted.
But hring dog j. better than dad ts9E." judge
Douglas if not deal lion lor tss 1ork. Is At least
coged and i0olBless ore. Hos osn be oppose TIE ad
vances OF Slavery He done care sSytainS about h.
IIis evOwed m'sSi0R IS naPTssgag t1e pnohc hear
TO care nothing about H.
A leading Douglas Denocfe.ic yewsDtper thinks
Douglas supeiio TALENT will be nescsl 70 resist tue
revival OF the African slays-trsde. Does Douglas
believe an effort 70 revive thar tcads Is approaching
lie as not sai3 80. Does he really link 20 Bl,I
il IT, bow can he resist III Fr yssrs be has hb)rsf
IN prOye IL a s0crsi piQI of whIs T. take nsgfo
slaves l.to toe res Territories Csa ne possibly show
that il il les slcted right - bug them shs,s they
can be bought cleapest And unluest0nsoy they
cen be bought cheaper tn Afrca thsn 10 VygrHsd lie
has dore all in bis power 10 reduce tie whole que on
CT Slavery 10 III 4 rfgt u pr0psrtY, esd ~
euob how can he OppOse the foreign ezysfT pde-JOE
can Re refuse tbs. trade IT, tha. property enii bc