New-York daily tribune., 1858-11-27
LAW LNIELLIGENCK

La " NIELLIGENCX
SUPREME ceuKf-cw,xszv,-Nov ssl--sssDrs 'sass
SUTHERLAND
THE s.cxLr5 ELEC TON CONTEXT.
Tie People en rel Daniel Z ssAs. ss The sesi Il css
vss.srs Il the County ef Nsw.York.
wren this case came on for hearing this morning.
exJudge Whiting or the respont.nts, offered tyoo6-
iectops lst, To the residing Of any further andavS
or papers the rart of the restori ~, that ts'
Count had jurisd ction over ts'e subject ms~es.
The Jadge overrnled the objections, saying thai no
shoud allow Mr.. Graham to read af'idavit: 10 rcPyes
the one read by Mr.. Whiting yesterday. The soAew-
ing are Nh. Writings points 10 oojec 1pn: ~.
q + bss. in rs n ..s ssT u ss
nssI s ,is sas s,1an ~ t ,Ss c~n @ssrr.
r., ne TO 70 % sg' % Sss, ss ne prsr sss
tty the validity Of the returns becsiss tss
Ccpsuton United states a.co.e' h's "s.Sh ilsns
shall be the Judge Of the election rens aud iaahcsIons~
its own frub-n.p ETpre.'io nss eTos'io ai'.,fu,.
Tad The State coaI.s have 40 g niSs A .. ss'
disputed else .on 70 purely legislative 0h'o IN any
Fe's The c.a i~se behind the return q
the .SsSSy s. upon quo
FUth The msndanus ses when there anosS
yndes Sutherland said he thought the question was,
whether the Court had power, by mandsnus to COM
pel the canyassers 10 DO what tho statute says they
A desultory conversation followea, during which 4
was agreed that by rejecting the Fourth Dss1ct re
turns Mr. Siekos had 9j majority, and by NOT reject
Ing Ills vote there his majority WAS Increased ID SOgt
Judge Sutherland at one time was inclined 10 dis
miss the writ, believing that the Court had no power
to compel the Cenvassers 10 insert the vote OF that
District. spicy a.sn nmeht took place aud wss oea-
tinued throughout the day 10 tho amusement Of
great crowd Of spectators politicians oiiice-hoidofsr
&c. Mr. Graham only ssded that the Court direct
the Board to 10 what the statute required OF them and
he would be content for II they still cohnued contu
macious he would move for an order to puaish then
for contempt. Mr.. Whiting throughout denied the ju-
sdction of the Court to ec in the matter and in the
affdavits which he Submitted he impeaehed the ve-
raety Of some Of the deponeDts On the Other side.
The Judge took tho papers aud reserged bis de-
cnon, saying that he woaI confne himself merely y
the matter whether the wit Of oandam~ shooid
ISSUE or not. - f.f
This was an action two promissory notes dis
counted BY the plaintiff fs e. dated Dessobss g.
@ and .s Ssi B. s g. sS sa ...s. s e. E ;:
spn of W. C. AnnsS Co. of Witch in too deendsa En
ssy'oy sS'y s;' 90 Il: Sss no, NJ liz has
a Ssn .s. VS. VI ~ s y a and 4,S.s S. NJ W.
not hound sy TIE SC, Of the ,.n; Ths Cep ssn
lias him 10 .sn the irn binding npsa NJ Nm
buy whe,he be s..eHtsa TO % rot Jaasmss. i p'a's
Mr. Hall ios plaintiffs. Mr. Ki's.m tor d'fendsn'
CORRECTION.
Before Judge AuLLEs
SrlT .oAIssI THE APPLEr0Ns AoT DISMISSED.
Samuel ~ CASTOR sst D. Appleton ( Co. , -.
BY soue nadvertence the order entered On the -
instant diminishing he copan. IL u. @ ss.Sn was
,sn to q l p,' stssa y "s. tue
opie. e.ci had been published the first Of which part pay
s.cn ID ss To- have been rsd for secodios Of e
contract by note At six monta which tho ds.na:e .eaas
rsy the complain, shoaa have sssd demand aud reasef
The note enable ,Ls plaintiff % aadaes sydsnes o. ,ns
On aaan of pl.in eouoss soay s order above ns.
,onsd .t~o spa an entered ss A; .siou s
lo tie and he prnth have ess :. ssha w h t, a
We isn Tiaball T. Cuer for PLAINTIFF Eners'as
Prichard and Judge Dean :or a.t9nd.n''
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT oou2r-S'' a.-B'f''s
Judzs SELsoa.
THE SLAYER HAIDsE. .
rbi. case came On for thai today. The irst WI
John k1i !, ,s .,s ssos uasss sse:
WbIte. N, ~ cs.,t
Iss cass ~, wEs.s sr q &. f. Il. % wm
Isr Surveyor Of the port Of PTo'A~aee' n L. ana
ks ssu.e called Richard cswa bot s evidence vss e
10 particB.sr interest Tho CoGri then sdyuIns1'
THE CASE OF CAPT. JCDkISs. 49,.
II will bs remembered that Capt. JndkinS % tnS
psrsis e iqr os';sactins =. ~ 's.S e.
II0s.s oe.II Is' ,s.ns n L Lore 1a,pSts ssat C.1
yudi4s had been before two Gt.nd Jaiie~ s'@ 'h'
AInsy aae 1 s r. VA. he cas- ss a.eai,a, eas -
Be sIsSf .d VS. very desirable .ha. the ssGu e
vasts ~, s to- to he a,:d ss,ss 3.s. 'sa ~
Cus'oOus. cesr' .seo b. .'st ~ l.. q: co,ss;s. Ss -
Go co. s',s GSica d ss u T. T.; .2a s;s ssss
L Nona. hsm could s'*; .ss 20 E as os M
I &c. .-i.,on III Il olusI take tss. course
/ srpyprOR COCRT-Eor. 5.-Befne Jltss fiHaak9osf
sSA IsS. srssu az. Chu e. Mash Amin1Serstof. &c
IT,. was suit 10 recover compensation TOR sorvtcae
" 'rI ,t.pa.D. On the bfo,her u dei-lbsnL nos d.
s IT,. asssu.s ts4iths Is.rtt had been samieeay
h.r ssrycs serclst tor painin Tor hiSA k'caess
S,si s. - ,sr o!siItih J. q. Girard iar defendant
cocpT or COMMON PLxAs-sseetAL Tgax-hov. -
~~~~ Bsfars Jss,s HiLTox-DgcisioxA =.
R.I set uodges Reference ordered TO Woodpnoee
Hadyon =, - ,.,.x -;sh v,,ssH~
TO ,bis:s, sp-n5 70 conform 70 jsssnee
koss sgt. H.yers. Mo,ioa grsntedi caa,e 20 -
p,sed OF tho special cal Eesf for tIiA co TOO sae Acsssy
D.certer les JuG-usat now ent.rcc 20 seno sc9.y
:s sis ,o.l. ,f IA r.oiol aad dsbar-aasnA oa toe8
i.ia-
sragodATE'S CorRr-Nov S.-Beiors ~. En~AAa v.
WESr.
1ug WILL or ISAAC sEWTos.
The morning tho will Of tsac Newton, rsceAity -
ceased was propouIasa for probate hy ~. wn'
Kelly Il Rhinsbect., Dutchess Couaty. \. 7. IesFe
are no eIeemosyrAy bequesta mads, bat Tho tesss.F
directs to be p,,d among hs jos: debts hs sabscsp'
ton Of the Of 81 Oo0 70 the Sew-fork nsoSs
Caicn lcr nih,y ers, ,.c. oa, sni NV 70 tns Amer
! ekn Bsp.s. pub,;s .jos 4, ,sty. The w.low q %