The Texas Republican. [volume] (Marshall, Tex.) 1849-1869, 1858-02-20

'xht tfNN A>Vh8cA VI ~"
gl,g in "a Termsnt and ouandary
Oar contemporary Is certainly an af.le*s
dodeer, fruitful IN cxpedieuis for escape, bal
80 ineonsislen, tina, his ParPose IS transparent
to the most casual newspaper reader His
last paper, tor instance contains long article
" iih the following imposing heading shs''
Distinctions be Made - Siials Patty Lines BE-
Dawn where Political Principles are not at
Issue ;" When We glanced nj lh.- caption, We
naturally snppoeqd ,hilli was critical review
Of our remarks contained in the Republican OF
lheoh We anticipated that the editor would
attempt TO reply to the reasons adduced by Us
IN favor Of party NOM a,ions' that ~, Is he
pledged, such movement on the part OF the
Democracy would produce division and ensure
is defeat, that he would explain why il Wa
De was opposed to t. lie does nothing Of
the kind, Every thing bu, the subject 10 hand
seems to have engaged his attention. cap
uous criticism upon President buchanan a
discussion Of the Nieara gua question tbe
Kansas question and Gov Nsci the Austin
couycn on judicial nominations caucsso-
Sc mako up the theme. alluded 10 10 tbs
diiiaSe and ncohefcnl production. il - like
pie, described by Eugene sue, IN whieh WA
found all the meats 10 the market TO on'
V ho has regard for order and system, such .
styie Of composition is perpleSing- Ia iralh
werc We n hundred miles distant We should
suppose that our contemporary Was candidate
for "a lunatie ass lum, bui seeing him every day
we know that such is not the case
lie starts % by affecting To be sngry, when
everybody mast snow that It is mere sham.
lis a.cerbitg Of tcmser is not oecasioued by
the euofmHes which we accused him q COM
hitting as the High Prizes, Of Know Nothing
i.m two years ago, ia swearing people TO tbs
support Of sam But be talks about ed.,orIa
prophecies snd depreciation Of pcrsonalh les
because wc accused lim OF writing bis prev!-
Gus reflections after having seen our paper
I his he cmphailcaliy denies, aud tia; o! eour>'
is an end to the question But We were GER
tainly warranted IN believing that such was
the case. for the reason that one IL the young
genil men from bis Office obtained a copy oi
our paper Oh Friday evening, and we could
rot understand hos :. was, otherwise, that he
could know what the President Of the Dem
ocraiic Cub would 40, much less the prec i,
character Of the remarks we would offer upor
a rall for mass meeting Of the democracy
In this connections we said something about 9
witch, although the context viii ahow that ",
DID not exactly call our ueighbor one. II
this he says
The idea Of man of our huge proportion,
being called witch j. too prosoktug-f he
had said wizard we should have taken The
matter easier
Our contemporary ls about siN feet four H.
che, high, and OF spare fraue Itwoald GER
iainly he violation OF oh conceived ideas %
correct taste TO imagine him in the character
Of woman. bul we viii LAY this much, that
If he were to a;iemp, to persona;e female
character, he would never b. taken lor a wiz.
ard Imagine such figure, dressed IN me
latest style, with ul the assistance Of cunpilne,
the hair parted So the centre, ant ki.s.me.
qu.sh bonnet on the head Jerusalem Ia
the language Of The Cfockct Printer Great
Gravy" We mean, not this. Tine offence is
too great. Mother did CSC accuse Mm Of fall
ias in b,o ,i'h .aa democracy for while
we asserted ihal oae In reading the number Of
H., paper which we criticised, would think the
editor had suddenly fallen "a love with the
democratic party, aud was seriously fearful
that an uuad,i-ed step would be taken, which
might possibly tend to It's injury We at til"
same time stated that be would Ike TO see She
party led hcailoug 10 destruction, and rejoice
at its 4eltnt and Disgrace