New-York daily tribune., 1858-02-01
SITPRFME COIRT-IIN- %


Daniel d. Conover agt The Mayor Aldermen and Commons
Of the City Of NewYoik Chse. Deylln and Jsne. G. Wl
he plaintiff being saith that for the purpose Of eIpedns
he fDs determination of the action Of ~dy,anfo ssw
street, Of the cy Of BE- h..
Be prepared stipulation which h. been Ppovcd b. the eoun.A
for the plaintiffs In that action, and which deponent Offered -
sian upon the abandonment BY the said Deyn ard The AAy<.
Ademen snd Conmonsiy Of the City of sewY n ~ osA
the ey of the offers contained the letter Of Me. suwse
md Swan to The attorneys o. this o, ,n@ nS ,ae %
the terms OF The said oilers Tor the reason ihn %.
''O'"' . AL - '''' 0''V " WLEooErT Com Of Deed.
cSps Mt iG' P''tihi ia faS;i % e
Chombcrs tm9now SATURDAY the Sh i1s'h s II oe'S8
n'-Ne"'i'''' FiEEDi II D' sIUYrER Ijii AIRY. for rwa
To RicHARD BrsT,sb ead coas's. n !be c0P'n'i's -
10 Mess!s. STiLLwsLL SWAN
SUPREME COURT-JAs 90
p9i H. O. CS9ss S. Vs. ISs % M:I & ASte1 1 md %
CITY and Coanfy OF FORK, ss.: Richard Bvs-
eed being sworn, lnat h, ia the attorney and fs
.Sys hs .nd t a5 % 5 So e. 'aa ony os
either Of the other Bsued defendants depnsu further aT~
copy Of the sdav and noc bsrc. nnsxsi wihoa. .nJ 81.
plantation Of whs iesded iher.by dSnent faIhes
lief whether the plaintiff Conoyer desires expedite tho aas
eSon to h O 1d a op lille to .hs Os o st Corn sa
Of the City Of New YORK whether with hat view hs be-
sued be prepared the stipulation referred In the pec~des
D,pouent further says hat no stipulation having rerenss 70
s s % S i % & Mayor smnsn nsHsa saa
the City Of NewYors hss been presentd 20 deposen @
counsel deponent the .. q M:..
81 S% and sSsn 70 Me': red md s%. %eaIa"1 at n n
tents OF Of the Offer. contained therein OF o' s esaos
Dcpsnsnt further say. that d tho .d ett. contain. an, s
proposition puporny 70 come from tho deendsnts u
ss MyoI 5r ASssasS opoon wIoy %Sa 81 .usSy a. d.
deponsn: eonesIsS or h.. lnGcisd,s p,p'ss.i &c s.Sh
one Of th. present week By ar stveu he rsss1
ooro,1 BY the .yor Aldermen commonsy rSss: tls
y secured against os and indennhsd Tor tho
" 1 he'd he'd sse s% aS "y % a % sss
Dcvn which dd provide ha; they or one Of than. saoa
.on. although Tlns g fOreso h e.n claim. for cosss S
ibe actions Dep0neu, further .ays shs, 10 Of the sa. s1
il procured from Mr Justice Roosevelt the d~d..s
ton ,nd reference compute his damage. BY re.sSs =
he injunction allowed BY the same Jadss snd, seos
tips against The city. damages which aid tonoVvs
bad sustained BY Ct money. which be had become S -
that in he action IN the Pess sssnst Conoves snS
d. vim AID "ns,t BY ths Mayor Aldermen and Connsn.ty
wlcb udgl had said Conoyer oonsds n5e pra
liability incurred BY ,he City for printing and r-ses t
iing testimony ba, that ponen. hs. bera unable e ~
es9.e Of an iSeDetsan procured ou. q tie sapsa,.
MI Mr. J:iSs Psssody restraining any further p'oesen'' "'
D.poaea fthe says. ,h. tsh.!f q tho i M',st M -
do What he may lawfully fc.s u ds:.n,0ssa & o. e
SETON wHO be msn0nss and ss .Roe s
bu!.irg city .or actual outlay depsnsn WI oat
the actions against hen shoush sins 70 alsoef % wos r
,Ibe pendency Of such sctions a. Ss Js
uiI Of IS action OF wsFrsoio 70 "h< sse
OF the CRY l. not party aud By wnicn net
cannot be- sascd and ~hiCh |. a. sto. l.s.sa az -.
h, det ~. question title 20 onoe between Coos s sss
D, ,lh. Fu-ter aeponeps .sts mo-, klCn,D bC"iEhU
0""i1 " N ~ LAMPS SANDFORD, Com OF DseAs. :
Tue follow r 10 tho r referred to IN the asid'''' NJ
'"i'''''' HEyYOsg, Jan. 4 1853
mc..,. FrsLD . SLCYTss, Aiiy. o. ID d. Conover;
Gcr-ra the Pvo.s oi Inss. y ..2.ei, ~ ~ !. =
% - xibt The and spproosroa u Ne Brady
,,n IS. I,orey GrDerx, and Mr. Busted ths Copssha
C.,gsa, w suhni, the folevtas propositcns;
I.s We propcss tast a srh be,eeea tac p2tes dr-W
o,i15.y sXsrSt ic siass sst.on OF go sss-anis - 90
IL ,i4s q lie oas~. b. ., oaoe sbArforsA
s<xp-s 15ss 8s p.A-lt l. tas upa ~ 60 s1''N~