The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-06-16

parties limited a. the ought TO release the
corps dplomassque from the charge implied la c,nclui
down. disc aimed any intention Of embarrassing tho
eminent calling attention to the speech Of the ChAnce
me Earl Of Derby thought the speech Of his colleague
had been deemed indsoreet Lord Clarendon had commit
ted much greater ndscreton in bis present address, oy
40 would not oritcise every word ana phrase In the
speech At Slough, but all s main points he was prepared
70 defend The auson 70 the danger OF war with France
he explained only meant that peace between the two
countries endangered when the present
took office by the mpossbiy Of passing the Osnspira,y
BILL ~ concession 10 the Just irritation OF the French
people At the attempt the life Of the Emperor and he
asked whether the peril Of war with France in case Mr.
Miner Gioeons motion were carried, was not hold out 70
deter members Of the House OF Commons from voting for
The preservation OF peace he attributed In great de-
gree 70 the Emperor Of France, who having init
absianed from pressing claims 70 which he felt the Eng
lab government could not accede He compared the
suits Of the action Of the present ministry in the case Of
the CsgiAri with the very slight CONCESSIONS obtained
by Lord Clarendon stating tina. the Cabinet had made the
claim for indemnity, and intended 10 support IL He
debaIes equivalent 70 motions in both Houses Of Para
ment the members Of the Late ministry not justified
in complaining Of the language Of minister Of the
crown, even on post prandia occasions. He tainted
Lord Clarendon with emitting all Allusion 70 the
description Of the break up OF the opposition in
graphic, was also exceedingly true; and with having
equally orboIne any reference 70 the explanation Of tho
financial policy Of the miostry and the Baaget He re-
"
the Indian policy Of the government which he described
- one Of moderation and clemency ~ opposed 70 the vo
ence counseled BY Of those whom Lord Canning
was surrounded He would not defend every phrase OF
the speech The Chancellor Of the Exchequer but though
some Of It's language and expressions might deserve
passing notice from those who dsapproved them, he
thought more had been made Of the incident than
consistent with the dignity Of either house Of Parliament
He did not shrink from defending absent friend, who
bad been attacked enngs In the House
OF Commons, where he had replied for himself and had
given those opponents such explanation neither they
nor the country would speedily forget.
Earl GRANVILLE usaed the notice that bad been taken Of
the and the reference the Budget
as vapgorious since the financial policy Of the govern
ment had only been the negative Of not muddlpg
away money in paying debts" but postponng liabilities
they had better have met In . holder manner 10 the
charge OF conspiracy BY . cAbal answer whatever
had been given Az 70 India Lord Canning supported
by the opinion Of the country, and required aid from
speeches that delivered At Slough Lord Careu-
don entitled to their thanks for the able and concu
sve In which he had criticised that address and
cleared up many points which serious misconceptions
existed
The Earl OF MAIMEsBrRY thought ABSURD for any ono
70 ak explanations Of speech from those who never
heard IT, He thought The address compared advanta-
geousy with that Of Lord Pamertoa the Mansion House
two years age.
Alter few observations from the Earl Of CLARENDON
their lordships adjourned.