Fremont journal. [volume] (Fremont, Sandusky County [Ohio]) 1853-1866, 1858-04-02
THO ,ri.h ot INC People.


The Ohio State Journal, says, 'Not a
word in favor Of an adjourned session comes
from the Republican Press. Some papers
have simply condemned it, and we have no
doubt that they MI will. The Cleveland
Leader expresses the sentiments Of more
than nineteen-twentietbs Of the Republicans
Of the State, and rs wo verify believe Of a
majority Of tho rest of the people when,
speaking Of the Reserve and Cuyahoga
county, it says; Both hands would be held
up in favor of an adjournment sine die, by
nine-tenths Of tho voters;' and that the
shrewd leaders of the party would be glad TO
have the Republicans share with them the
blanc of the unnecessary delay in legisla-
ton the Democratic majority have been
guilty Of and in the odium of an adjourned
session. and that the people have already
had surfcit OF party legislation, and least
of all desire another session at cost Of
$4,000 or 100000, to perfect party
schemes and party cnactments, and nothing
else.'"
The Lancaster Gazette (Amcrican) says
We notice that our a0ise Legislature have
already devoted time enough to the discus
sion of proposition for an adjourned ses-
sion of their honorable body, to have passed
all the laws necessary for tho good govern
ment of tho State of Ohio for twenty years
to come; but in place of doing up their bu-
siness like honest men, the Senate on Satur-
day last passed resolution to have an ad-
jaurncd session, in which to sport with the
interest of the people of Ohio-and have a
long and strong tug at the public teat,-
Why this wilful, and reckless violation of
the letter and spirit of the Constitutionl 4
4 4 We are decidedly in favor of an
nual sessions, but while VIC have Constitu-
ton limiting us to biennial sessions, let us
scrupulously adhere to and honestly obey
the organic act, the fundamental law of the
land, and by so doing demonstrate to the
people, the necessity of a change.
The Hardin Republican says:
A resolution has passed the Senate by n
vote of 10 to 0, providing for an adjourned
session. The resolution contemplates an
on the 18th of April, to meet
again on the first Monday Of January, 1859.
We are gratifed to learn that Senator
Catch, together with eight other of his Re
publican associates recorded their votes
against the passage of the resolution.
The Buckeye State (Ncw Lisbon, Colum-
biana county,) says:
The Senate on the 10Th inst, agreed to
resolution for holding an adjourned session
of the Legislature next winter. We hope
that no Republican voted for il. Il \
This model Legislature has been in session
ninety days, and have done nothing, in fact,
but passed bill to open our iails for the
confinement of fugitves from slavery, pow
WOW over half dozen miserable Sub-Treas-
ury bills, indorsc Buchanan's administra-
ton land finally, we find recorded the as
sent of the Locofoco Senate, to an adjourn
ed session! 1t is thought that the Senate
bill will pass tho House. Let Republicans
keep hands off.
The Lima Gazette and Carol Free Press
both oppose it, and the Seneca Adportisey
Democratic) condemns the proposition as
"a very impoltic move." We trust that the
Republicans in the Legislature will stand
firm in opposition to this unnecessary meas
ure.