Lynchburg daily Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1852-1861, 1858-10-14

4&SS~~~s WAsJs~Sss~s
Thursday Morning. ... October IL. .lese
A sNasional" Dsnocrat.
oxs Of he mast altrs Nai;essl Democrats b ~
prsssst Coasrsss. and one Who went 10 The fsrtA-
- extesas h The euunciatioo Of conservative
ssetinsses a ~ aoor Of the House Of Repressn-
aEipA ~ ~ Han. williAa 8. 0roesbsok, rep
rsssesasivs of one Of the Cincinnati Cougression
Il DisaziesA Duriag the discussion Of the Eng
lisA III, NJ. 0rossbsck was one Of its most
ssasas advooaAa, and took advantage Of every
ooeasioa which o9sred, to impress on the public
uind he npoauaDes act that. 'lst Others do -
they nisktS he, FOR ono. was resolved to stand up
for he rights Il ths people, and the equality Of
tAs S1aAss. h
rsPssssaaaivs nsds him vastly popular with the
Administrator wiag in Congress, and caused him
70 become siasdiae toast with the sclf-appointsd
guardians Il SostAss. rights in that body. Our
Only objseG II rsesrriag TO Mr.. Groesbeck At this
time Il 10 give pablicity to 4 short extract from
spsscA nsde BY hin one day last week, and which
shows very eeasaasively. that that gentleman has
for Ais party ftisnds at Warrington city, Get Of
principles quite the reverse Of those he promulses
bsiorS his imnsdiats constituents. One Of the
chief weapons used against him BY his Black Re-
publican competitor WAS his advocacy of.and vote
for The English amendment to the Kansas Bill
Gurley. his Republican opponent commended
tia. Ne English Bill was repugnant to the feel
ines and pvejsdioss Of the people of the North
and thas IN voting for il, he msrepresented the
wishes Il his constituents. To this charge Mr..
Grossbsck replied - follows:
He hsd hoped tonight to discuss ether ques-
tons besides that OF kanzss. lie had hoped to
show bow exoellently and satisfactorily the Ad-
ministsation party had put down fllibustering in
ths South; boz the Utah question had been eet
tlsa, and how vol and noby our honor and tho
rights ct our flag had been sustained upon tho O.
ceaA. fH.a
BAae The debate seemed TO be confined to the
Ks.sss ssestion, he would cheerlully review bis
ceuEse il that matter.
Mr. 0roesbesk then proceeded to review the /
Criseodsa Asahganery amendment, and the En-.
glish I'LL, end to show that they both subsnitted
tho Leeonplon Constitution ~ the people. and ,
that the oily difference vas that under the form
or, The Lesoaptoa Constitution Vas relected, the
psopa cosA prsoseA 1t COCO to fore . new Con- /
stitutian, while under the English bill they must
have . po1alation equal TO the rate Il rPrescnta-
tion, which Mr.. 0roesbock contended. from the
sten Of the vote lsst month-l4u0O--uas almost
tho amount they aow poasessed.
Ar. 0rcesoeok e'ea showed that o'e Lana or's
Xsn... ..o,s L NJ .h." hsd hs.. osred 10 ali the
ppeyioss eoatIinr acts o< Grow. Banks and
Critsea6en and not half 80 much as the bill intro
dsoed y Mr.; Dougias IN ISJ. and only one to"rtn
", n.o w. .,e;.sS 10, ,hs y. .I.. Ill, hsd
y;-.. ,s.rs :, V.n... .nd The, We .houLI be
thAnkfl far dc quiet which reigned there
H q. de,isred h,msel, IN favor OF free s...es'
"ss - - ID" p.ppnb.H ';,h ...l",;n. ,hc
csuse az Foe Slases ), recusnr % admit Names
ota and Orseu.= olais.ed THAT oil t'e free Staies
that hsd nse1 sAsHtea fAdccs'e "a u"der ts'e au-
s"i. 49,, 10y y, S s.s.ars. .h".
vonld ~: S;,s n. IS, sr. -lorSed Tie Union
and pledged bis devotion ~ it allsled to Mr.. |
ton passy. and co0clHAsd ey pra'sHs h'e Demo
ss..r !. -, II r.. .,,o.. r,..;o,. ,....,.