New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-03-29
PRICE TWO CENTS.
A r ID
PyrrRsoys FINAL REPLY TO PUTNAM.


G. PurI,n-Slr: hop-d VIXEN published ny lss, -ti,
tia, had done with VOC tu you denied that you
Altered int rpos,ed omitted" any psEts Of the
card which signed ogeher compelled 20 prove The cor
retness Of my assertions.
Irepe. therefor that you teed" the card aninot only
"seIsd" H. but "nt,TFosed" IL no. only "iuerPoaed II,
B.. on,t,Gr portions Of ,h,I begin with The last
Fir,. Yov OMITTED IMPORTANT PsRr-ThOuga the letter
wbh Mr. Maitland r turned cut TO b. no; senuee.
there htter from Wahinson Irving t,he original Of which
my posse.ou sod acknowedgd au,hentc BY your
% her. Witnessed which stipulated expressly should be in
serted TIE card about 20 sian. Stipulated this be-
the letter In question praised Ssaroe quite much IS
oer ard because the sist Of this controversy really
Whether MI Irving did, did not, eulogEe sarsroe" Bat
housh you assured your honor that this letter should
form part the card It omitted when that card appeared.
ousimpt 10 Justify yourself by saying that You took he
card the letter IL It, to the Newspapers and that he ed
tors themselves let IL out Unfortunately for your s'ateen
mutaed card appeared fret in The Tribune the afternoon
II the same day The Evening POST and The following morn
ps In The Tines Now Sir il not your duty, when You
rpd ,b,, ~ card csrne out rnutaed ia The Tribune
r.rnsy that printed correctly in the Poet and Tines
for which you bad ample time You engaged Sir 20 have be
card .ppear eN.ctys- when signed it trusted to
vow honor l was deceived
Sir # Others be- believed you have caused this important
emission th. point quote the following letters from e D.
| L.pe e.q., aud J. A. Maitland esq.
NEw-YoRx Ma n N. 1858.
Dear Sir: have The Offices Of The Post Tribune aud
Times aut ed ard they al that the original -t'
,sr Of Wasbugn attached TO the from Nr
Pat am ~ had been would have been published.
Pupar seems Try and ysiify the matter much posi-
HE. and II have any opinion all Il 10 me he wants ii
be inferred Ri. cad that there letter At all from
washington yipr would print Nj lrns'' true letter
'A' '' In HIATT y99urs trly Z. d. LONG.
No. 81 c,xRoLt-sr., BRoosLys}
"Wednesday Night
T b. PETERSON ESQ: 800
D,.r Sir see by card Which appears in Toe Times Of this
day tba Mr. has and contrary good ath
omitted changed aud iu.rpaed the card wrote for nser
ZION in TIE Times Monday pres a. the time the
-srd written, aud heard S that you urged 90 the 'no
J''' your. vervre.p.etfuly. JAS A. MAITLAND.
con,Ger this sufficient Sir 20 convin'e an impartial public
that You have portion and important portion of the
card sigred with You.
Second: Y0U srERPoLArED taE CAaD-fn your own card
Der date March "a you ADM; this You The following
lines were annexed the newspap-r eopis" If snnexing
phrases nterpolsis what Toes n'erposting mean Let
study of Webste Dictionary before you
write slotber carl.
Ihpd You ALTERED THE C,RDltis sufficient In c1nclu
,on to inform you positions ami omissions constitute
alterations, sls scqnsnt you that when two parties
who have had controversy agree mutually card which both
are 10 sign the omission Of single word by Of those parties
IL violation Of the agreement. And when this omission Ava
one ard has ade by the PARTY whom the publication Of
the card con6ded il breach OF trust Sir farewell
Respectfully yours, T. b. PETERSON
| Philadelphia. March n, 1883
4