New-York daily tribune., 1858-07-08


".hch .bs b. .ocs..ibs the pubic moderr,. oha,EA
br.f, Of The msrssc t oetcder, bui for the pgbe and II
eoses nat toe 70 rnsroes siysn BY h' nfaton So. Be
fore % o. oon,der,d light nj N over
dsInsId up,r the bsss the ss 2ris Se
COMMON u.e and urdef,tsnd osfrrdsn. counse % sim:
;htths public rave hight % epJ2y the bic PARIS .ed
which nsy b. empc for the enforcement Of such riih
th. wit Il complaint TO uPerors aa Tity iHs &
nent snd civil scion, a, the eas@ RAY b tr .f.
In Tie tief nj ca'e coz 49, - -. ali -
exhibition Tire p bic smusenut eau. Of his
vii csp,ce exclude lousoever ne psases not, r
Acsdry OF Mu.c public .tuou. the risht Of admission
rot o,nuit gsve ercr bet va. jlfsd by tie -. n .p
po ths the cher person hsd despite The will of M
BE- ,on itted ,tereou Mr. Usn committed IN
suPrors TIA ne tad st to Pyen. az De BE- p.sed from
puci'5s ueket snd fFou eenT 4 ati'd OF teo7 tany
esA somscr arer sdnsson disorceIJ OF hss,nT
infectious eoui's US d'.e he may be popen esslsded
ueous sppsu'e or deppfooto1 WI Dot e4Pe ne Spa 81
Leeto to the chsgs Of being disoeeTy nor viii The
Def noAnts counsel Ngpe. tia; pubo Poy requires ,ha
Judges of Record should ret b. indicted ~ mistake,
of law is or dou biedy c:rTec perceive Wait lpp
cation has 10 The pfeset case Tie c1 before me on th'
NAKED old fr at q the defendants o.
sppesr tst wsrr had been duy issued upon proper and
sufficient evidence BY officer authorized 70 isue IL and ts
ell The ,pon which compaiaAn ba.s their coupsin.s
new the Issuing and n the proper snd legal execution
such Of oheT lepl warrant thee II such
sn ued ~ toe mssi,r..e honestly in to- bona hie
Performance Of hs d. be would b. comp ety protected sad
leg bef face then the officer. ard pe'ou' ens,Id 10
such eYscu would aso be soied they seed honesty and
bora fde Ia performance OF tEf duty These views bling
he consideration Of the ons questions Of aw which sIe
upon the psPes. before me sad the'e are;
INV sbeorcnt Grand jury can ndot npon the re com
plant and the same eden,e The statute reui that Grand
jury Of st least sixteen ard az most twenty three sud
r. 'rs.m.,tv tbe, n Of Jur, Of six,eSn eIeTsu b. in
of
f nd Gd get the proposition goes to the extent that ho ave
members have found verdict Of not guilty 70 cveu
thereby peven al further essation Tas contrary
b. the re that obtsl IN respect 10 Petit Jury tor in order TO
give their verdict such conclusive efec, the who
sd the maer must be submitted % the
eaion Of another joy Ii !. ooqtray .o . the ra tn.i
three persons IN which be m'ory rue aac not
the minority, the OILY ehec. Of Grand Jury
falling TO find bill the same as the disagreement o Pit
a. long sso .s I7a the doctrine established
pu aud d,H'd by one Grand iuIy m,b. be renew
JuryA Adoisors Penn Rep and Charge AZ far a.
ascertain this hss been the Pcee ever since snd IN my uds
ueut there econ to H. but the contrary there are
many 7 ssons i-I lis support snG continuaace; ~,
Seord That the addressed 70 the Grand Jury
coming from private patty spd no' ron the DcI a'Iney
con,ued gu sry AID that they ccu;sia uuswoIn sats
ments Of fec. upon which it must BE- assumed TIA, the Grand
jury in rert scd a1d that bens 70 nd oil on
unswo tremeus the stng pom such unswon sia'enent'
ters the Gard Jury should pass through tie District
Attorney least be submitted with his aEcJn and this is
rule OF Law prohibiting private iLdvitual from bringing 10 the
notice q Grand Jury Of complaint he msy
orspsie coIrp;s upon their own notion To do they
must in wsyei'her from their own knowledge or BY IN
onersk coguzan of the matters which
constitute TIE for the complaint which they originate
deem well settled that In c.se the Grand Jdry 'ho them
selves have knowledge or receive information III. crime had
TO inyes,ieae the .er without ne consent or even opp
ti9n to the pe Attorey They havins I'll. pose sarsy
ton they received Of toe matters pp which i' oaad came
,tiougn Ia % TnI s r.sT '"s so. ii on Of r
bo sy. The compini beloIe the D..nc. A,orney
Hp II tn ks
Jurors and there is for suppong that large
number c.rs acting body. wi heed to
tbs Dt Aorney is thu ordinary legal adviser Of the Grand
sss' AZ is. "a
tctAttoiney through sI favor corruption CT decscy should
S % , Ss e tRs Ss the .a sa 5.
directly the notice Of his suPeors by the conpsnsut
Of copant to e .pg oes q that BODY ss
gate the matter and find or not hnd aecodus 70 a 6 as
them ilfsme their passions By exciting sppea or % operate
ce pI .ud The indictment found in pursuauce thereof
should be- Sc. ssde II becomes therefore, matt tt 70 lqe
The LITTER Of Juue TO- VIII the accompanying docuuen, to the
Grand jury contains statement ol the st OF the wit
with the nt. to Be proven BY them These % w,Le M
tended bring The ns In The s 9saGg 70 saS rn, ss
Investigation OF the matter a-d 20 Ss
aurht we know every SOLITARY Of fact con,aued in
proved BY lie Witnesses called and exsnned 'e orc the
Grand Juiy and tnee no mistaken con lsions OF law con
red in it. They do not contain any nnimnaoLy or eIhs
tie defendant, should interfere with the scion OF he Jury
against him II shall APPEAR 10 them that such action popsf
these papeIs hd not been the initiative step ou. mad oeen
submitted siter all the evidence had been taken, it might, per-
hsps then be deemed attempt Informally 10 Communicate
with and a. the the S M "a. senop Of
the GIar1 Jury the subject ane that seI teiI transmission
control bias the iaesment wnh they should exercise upon
due sId patent Gi hs whole % G I.Bs ~
that Mr Moue wh spPeHed before them was he counsel
This ,on appears 10 70 be very lsrness and
any effect would naturally DC oIe tuacs 70 the prog u
defendants.
The cl.s Of the Commonwealth rel JacI ", Cans ws
or,u IL rts which occurred ia the City OF Phit
itary force had called under the command OF G-n
Patterson who issued oder desiring tina; until the excitement
should have passed away county district or ward meet
10 bod ,au uou. ard excited large aud not
Gus would clear and occupy oy an oec
fe Grand jury preseument to the Cur; concern
snd the Court had .Pe ally ea,d en- .as en-,
r the BY and S5rss ~ 70 ns % o'aSe S Ss Z.
ard unconstitutional measures He further ,a,d resa'd
sS sa @ atay ioIee Tat is sbit.ly Illegal ad
sSd viii BE- resisted TIE unest b him fne Gfsd Jaiy .n
eIei s C Ut, and called the aetii'n oi the Coui' 20 le
letter. .,,,
th, sienP to psaye te arm Of civic powe
and bold effort 70 obsrue an h0te. and & ,a
o, the letter manifested disposition 70 deter tie OI a1 n9e:
e the county the performance Of day ineden. TO her
which this letter Wa. addressed 10 tie Gra0d Jury t Court
hed aefoudsnt liable 70 the crime OF attempting 10 oo'c
Admitting the consacQn put by the Grand Jur ard the
Court upcn the Of INT deiucsnt the de asi1n VI Ge ut
w.s b:eey and views Of The aw which hsve
above aid coufnatle to that decision lie o;herenee
between the ress in n, dheeuce between he 'ac
Thai case rss which 10 ye~ Of the Court "a stemps
made by party liable be affected b, The aos OF toe Gf.ad
tn. law. by ncsno,ry wits transmitted TO then pending
their ye.,saiiops into the suteo. m.teI h ..,,.,
,entn O Grsd Jury sed to have been com