Clearfield Republican. [volume] (Clearfield, Pa.) 1851-1937, 1858-12-22


ot clso hoy wh rt,cro Their pa,t actions
The history of his recent attempt 10 bull,
iho mcmbot " the Legislature into hi'
support, and HE threats OF yeushnco Upon
those who opposed of competed with him
for IN election 10 the United States sch'
nto, 10 say nothing of his more recent
treochory towards his friend and former
idol Mr.. Buchanan, nro too fresh IN The
minds Of the people to admit Of their re-
gardiEg him rs anything else than polit.
ical deperado.
Those who have been so unfortunate
I've would rather say fortunato,) as to fall
under the ban Of his displcasurc, be il
either Mr.. Buchanan, Mr. Bigler or any
other democrat, because he has not forsa,
ken the old land marks of his faith, are
infinitely better off with the enmity of q
man whose friendship never rises above
sycophOncy--who can only censure those
above him, his own position being too low
W ullDN Hltl wv piJ''b III lllc N'lAIhly W.
rcction--whd only condemns os Satan, not
because the object of his dislike is not yir-
tuous, but because he hopes that by temp
tation he can be brought TO sin. The ma
lignity of his denunciation would add lus>
turc to any reputation, while the slime ol
his praise would bedim the brightest fame
But Formcy seems to be one Of those
pestilcntial yisitttions to which the world
has always been periodically subject
America has had her Arnold, Hungary her
Georgy, and the Democratic party-should
not complain at q much inferior calamity.
As for the "man Friday" we have only
to say, that weakness of the knees, y
would be a minor misfortune to the weak
ness Of head that could employ itself in
the concoction of such a miserable hash
of misapplicd and hackneyed quotations,
however beautiful they may be in their
own pages, as is contained the article we
have herein alluded to- SO for the pres
ent we dismiss "Yhe press and its gang"
The REpLY.-At the request of mum,
Der of our subscribers we publish this week
the reply to the memorial of the citizens of
Cleartield over the signature of "Curwens-
vile" Some mistake seems to exist as
to the reason why we did not publish it
simultaneously with the JomuaL No copy
of it was furnished us, and no request to
publish it wds made until late on last Mon
cay evening at least one day later than it
should have been done, to enable us to is
sue our paper rs early as we had intended,
and the consequence is We are again day
behind time.
As to the arguments Of the "rcply' we
have nothing TO say. 1t certainly alyan.
ces no reasons for removal and seems to
have been only designed as criticism up
on the manner in which the memorial was
worded, and a wish to have - fling at
somebody the writer did not like.
SARA. We have Ion! supposed this
celebrated drug had come to be an explo-
ded hnmbug, but we were assured by those
skilled in the healing art, that not the Sar-
saparilla itself is to be blamed for this con d.
clusion, but the miserable worthless prep.
aratons of it, that have been palmed off
upon the oommunity-preparations which
contain Ubout as much of its virtues rs
they do Of gold dust. It's commercial
fact that almost all the Sarsaparila gath
cred 1t the world, is consumed in the old
countries of Europe, where the science of
medicine, has reached its highest perfcc-
ton, and where they know the best what
to employ for the mastery of disease. 49,
Hence we are glad to find that we are now
to have compound of this excellent al
terative, which can be relied on, and our
community will not need to he assured,
that anything Door. AVER makes, is wors
thy of their confidence. lie has been for
years engaged in eliminating this remedy
(sec ady'g cols.) designing to make it his
"chJEourrc' which should add the crown
ing glory to his already enyablc rcputa-
ton. Imcriran Cch Noc York.
CURWENSVILLE MEETING.