The Washington union., 1858-03-25

First had her proceedings been perfectly regular sec
ond, had she the requisite population and had that pop,
ulation the stability and order h, Justify her ssinsi<sn
third her application will the people sgsskipg
in voice which could not be misundesfoed aud fourth
had the constitution en made by that people and
the State objects now IN esrepee elected b. that people
and entitled discharge thfir e3ecutive dstjsl Nc
maintained The Affirmative Of the rst two. and the ogs-
tive of the remaining questions He unsl lliDg
establish precedent ty the admission Of that
tipn IL was said that the people applying for ad
mission whilst they protested against admission sptsy
that constitution To which ID thcre voices would thes
hearken He dstrusted her possession Of the requisite
population he not satisfied that her proceedings
sufficiently regular, did he think that the sypc
that Of the people II Kansas Notwithstanding that
he should vote for her admission provided the people Of
Kansas should have secured to them the right form
without violence the institutions under which
they desired TO live.
Mr.. kILGORE Of Indiana, denounced the course ~
the President in relation Kansas and charged that
at public meeting held ia Lancaster In resolutions
in opposition 10 slavery adopted and that Mr. Bu
chsnan was one OF the committee Of three who
ported those resolutions
Mr. j. CLANCY JONES with the gentleman
would give Us his authority
Nj. kIDGORE You will find il 10 the Lancaster In
telhgencer, No 2i, vol n puhIished in 1919
Mr. }. CLANCY JONES With the permission of the
gentleman, have had occasion than repeat
what am about TO say upon this subject and thai
s, that Mr. Buchanan signed the resolution and
TINT it had bis sanction 10 shape form His
name attached to it without his authority ie-
quenty happens without his knowledge assent That
is the simple history of the llttter
Mr.. FURVIANCE. desire 10 ask my colleague il
Mr. Buchanan did ever, in any shape forID disavow
the resolution at that time
hr. FLORENCE. No; nor at any other time that he
assaed
Mr. j. CLANCY JONES am not aware that he
did
Mr., KILGoRE. cannot admit this cross firing
Mr. GROW. would like to ask my colleague if Mr.
Buchanan in favor Of the Missouri Compromise
Mr.. j. CLANCY JONES He gave bis assent Ia it ss
peace measure when every leading patriot In the
try North and South advocated its passage the
Union.
Mr. KILGoRE then proceeded to defend the black re
publican party from the charge Of aaltionis contrast
ing the condition of the North with freedom with that
the South with slavery and of opposed the Le
compton constitution
Mr.. HUGHES, of Indiana, replied to the remark OF
Mr. knGoBH that he Clay whig by reading from
OF his speeches 10 show that he opposed the
fugtsesiaye law, and that he had said that be would
regard il the pronet hour Of his life if compelled
surrender property and personal liberty for refusing to
maintain II.
| Mr. KlIGoRE asked Mr.. Hrouss whether he had not
said even since commencement Of the present Con
gress that the Dred Scott decision was not the law
Mr.. HUGHES denied that he had uttered such
sentiment in his life
| Mr.. STEWART Of Marylaid esutestly advocated the
admission Kansas under the Iscompton constitution
and defended that instrument from the charges of fraud
that had been made against il He coniendei that il
not necessary that State should have any constitution
at all when amittd and cited instances where States
had becn admitted without constitutions.
Mr., BuFFINTON, Of Massachusetts said il was not
merely because slavery would he established by the Le
compton constitution that he opposed the admission 81
kausas State Had constitution RECOGNISING slavery
been clearly adopted the question whether slavery would
be sufficient objection would have been fairly before
them He based Isis opposition upon the frauds pcFpera
ted in Kansas
Mr.. TALBOT, of Kentucky, obtained the floor when
the committee
Andai Is minutes past Eve clock p m the House ad
journei
ny -rnTT California Jatn-an
praying compensation
| cf California.
RE~ovar Jrpag Ionase ~ Yesterday Governor Banks
complied with the address Of the Massachusetts gsla
tupe by removing Judge Loring IL is seldom in this
country that Judge is turned out of Office for decisian
oontsscily according 20 law. Indeed, not
that parallel has occurred
Judge L. found himself called upon to enforce
Of Congress and he performed his Judicial duty IN cpmpli
aace with his oath Of office The question was the
fuGitiycsiayc law IL unpopular throughout the
North and specially Msssachusetts But the unpop-
ulaIity of law does not Judge from ils exocu
tiop So at least thought Judge LcIinc. and he acted
accordingly His decision reused the has
political opponents and nj length republican egss
and governor have unwsely and anusty yielded To
their demands This act u Gov Banks the CROSSE
attack upon the independence OF the judiciary ever wit
! messed in the United States. 1t will long maintain as
we trust its bad eminence ". T. Times repasscan
ANOTHER KANSAS FARCE If mistake not the new