The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1858-06-22
WILLIAM WoODNll4LE and others as SETH READ
LEVI EASTON, HEZEKIAH EASTON, DAVID REED,
and others
IN THE CIRCUIT COITRT FOR RAJ

i TIMORE CITY-May Term 1s5s-Tbe ORIGINAL Riu
in this case was filed by the complanans, William Wood
vile and Others creditors of Reed Il Company
and of ezekiah Easton to have sold satisfaction of
their said debts and claims certain real property situate
in Baltimore county, known Lot 10 of the Baltimore
Companys lands and parts of called Frederick
stadt and Smiths Forest" 1t charges that Seth Reed
mortgaged the said property May l4h 1856 to Levi
Eason to alleged indebtedness of $4,000 and
also to the said Levi Easton September 18th lS6 To
secure alleged indebtedness of SIS OO0 that on Decem
Der 29h 1885, the said Levi Easton received an assign
ment OF mortgage of S25S07 upon the same property
executed to certain Camilus Kidder September l6tn
1886 and by him assigned TO said Levi Easton that
said Levi Eason received the said mortgages and assign
ments and for part of the Reed Easton Co
and that the complanans through their Equities set
out in the Bill entitled the benefit and advantage
thereof as creditors of said firm
1t further charges the execution other mortgages
prior these upon the said premises
part parts thereof the executed by Seth
Reed in favor of certain David Reed of Boston Nassa
chusetts October 11th, 1S4S secure payment of
note of Seth Reed of the amount of O5 dated April
10Th S4S navable three years after date and N. b
mortgage executed by said Seth Reed June 2h 1852 to
secure payment of rote of S741 to certain Augustus NJ
Price and Camillus Kdder of Baltimore but whether
either both of said last named mortgages is are vet
due and unsasfed whether the notes intended
secured thereby have been paid the companans say
hey have no means of knowledge though they presume
from the lapse of time that they have both been satisfied
The Bill asks that the compainants be substituted to
the rights of Levi Easton under the three mortgages
and that the parties answer the allegations of the
BILL and especially that David Reed Camius Kidder
Augustus NJ Price answer whether the mortgages
ing IN their names as aforesaid have not been duly salts
he'd and paid, and what the consideration of each
lheeo ana out OF what transaction transactions they
arose and that the morgaged premises be sold for the
henet OF the companants and that further relief be
granted to them
All of the parties the said Bill defendants having
duly appeared by their solicitors and of them except
David Reed and Seth Reed, having filed their answers
respectively the complanans filed their amended Bill to
the present May Term of the Court alleging they
been informed that the mortgage executed
to David Reed claimed to have been transferred
about the 9Th of January, 1852 to John B. Tou
min and William Henry st. John and Sophia J. ST. john
Wlie OF Samuel St. John, Junior that they claimed
some interest therein and further alleging that said
gage has been fully paid and satisfied and that no inter
est Whatever passed to said Toumin said William
H. and Sophia j. St john by said pretended assignment
anu that the said parties have with said prem
ses and that the complanants entitled have the
same sold and receive the proceeds thereof without
or hlndrance OF said Toumin and said William H. and
SOPHIA D. St John of them, any their parci-
patton In the SAID proceeds and praying that said parties
together with Samuel st. john Junior may answer the
said amended and original Bills and that the complain.
ants may have the said property sold and receive the
proceeds and alleging that said defendants
dents and praying order of publication against them
1t is thereupon, this fifth day of June, 1855 adjudged
and ordered that the complanans by causing copy
this order to be inserted in newspaper published in
the city of Baltimore in each of successive
before the seventh day of July give
the said John b Toumin, William Henry St John, Sam
ue ST. john Junior, and Sophia j. st. John, his WIFE of
the object and substance of the said original and amended
Bills and them to appear in this Court in person
by before the ninth day of October
answer the premises and show if any they have,
wM GEO KREBs.