The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-03-14
then nut 10 the vote and ad opted

Art vas then put 10 the vote and adopted.
The Mar - TAlHoEr wish ed 70 learn what persons
could be oted by for hecoud not that there
Just proportion between the acts mentioned and the
penalties " be applied.
that reproach Of want Of precision could he alleged
agsrs, the articles spoken Of The words msno and
several of the French laws The mau@uvres which Art
could punish not Of ndetermnae character, out
acts clearly pointed out by NE object Which ,aey aimed
the public peace hatred contept tae
government The bill had not in view 10 pcaish either
regrets or "reminiscences or even hopes He could de-
clare that opinions expressed with less warmth
Of iangusge-epgrams or allusions-were net what the
bill desired TO reach.
NJ ExHs 0IIIyrm would wish TO have some explanation
given Of the real meaning Of the article. spoke OF in
Hences Kept up either with the interior or With foreign
blame OF the acts OF the government be pressed
letter written to friend in the interior. He scknow-
eoged maj ne ie uneasy At the vsgoeness Of the Ian
alike at the mercy Of arbitrary decisions. What in his
opinion, it designed 10 reach and punish the OPP
poe tion which 70 be found In the bosom of family
circles Having such opinions he must call the gov
eminent 70 assign precise meaning To the
NJ RsRocIF said tnat the whole question was this
ought TO be permitted 10 excite hatred and conte mpt OF
the government or to trouble public tranquility, or on
ish the which aimed at the obJecr Nothing
nqusitora intended by the article, and the words
consideration than in the Penal Code The fact Of having
written letter which might have been seized did not
constitute and, for his part he could 1not
conceive an extreme which might never occur being
brought forward a sufficient reason for opposing mea
Intended 10 defend such grave interests those which
at stake.
OJyIsR must insist that the bill reaches every pro.
vocation msde in public place or in the press Tha he
perfectly well UNDERSTOOD but what he could not under
stand that should be desired 10 reach the remarks
exchanged between friends
n. GRANER de CAssAGNAc desired to reply to N. de
Pierre matter which concerned himself personally
He wished TO OBSERVE that for twenty i've years he had
been defending the Of order and society and when
he locked at the state Of the country he aPprehen
sve that the moment had not arrived for him to retire
from action.
Articles 2 8, and successfully put to:he vote
and adopted
NJ oppose Article Having voted fer Arti.
Giles and he had not thought right TO oppose Article
which rendered persons condemned in virtue Of these
provisions subject TO the measures Of public safety out
he could admit that that enactment be applied to
sons condemned for other crimes or misdemeanors II
appeared to him that far related TO such persons
there existed sufficient guarantee in Article 22l OF the
subject them to the surveillance Of the police.
Article was adopted, as were Articles 7, and Q.
NJ GAREAU, speaking Of Article 10, observed that at
the Of voting this most important measure he felt
indescrbabe sadness comu forward TO decare thai
he could not sccede 10 the bill II beca he
anxious than any other 10 behold the firm mante
of the empire that he felt unable 70 vote bill de-
sgnaed unfortunate for s supporters and disastrous by
ns opponents.
Article 10 was adopted
The bill in its ensemble then put to the vote and
adopted by 227 votes TO "a.
The sitting WAS then brought to q close.