New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-05-28


"ter fcffsyirs o. eaarses. q b. PSI into tie
"Kins's TSes.ury. ard t,u. ard faith'ui Scc 1at
"retdsNd to his MSle.'y Of 'ts receipts anil az
"rerditure" By s,.o;e g. the tce.y further pro-
sides: THAT il ca.e the GoYosnor-G sofrs, Of
"Irdis in Coorc,l shoud b. ceupslle, to rrsort 10
utbe .xercise Of the authority ve-ttd in HIN by
"artcls 7, he vii entesvOr 20 fss "a possible !,
"m.uts.n, with such improvements "a they msy al
" nit Of TIE nstve institutions end forms OF al
"n;nist,st on win n the assumed territories, 50 8,
TO scilits the re.torstioa of these territories
"to TIE Sovereign Of Dude whtn thepF1qef Period
" for such re.toistion shall arrive.
This treaty lrofesses TO BE- concluded between
the Govern rGsneIal Of British Indaiu Councu,
on enc hand, and the Kirg u Dude OF the osher'
II w,., 81 .-cb. duly ratified, By both parties and
the rst:fcs,iops we're duly exchanged. But when
il wa, submitted to the Board Of Directors OF the
Es,t India Company, it was annuled (APril ID,
ls:S, AZ an ot scton OF the friendly relations o.
tween the Company AID the King OF Ouae, ard IN
encrc acdn. ut, en- the part OF the GoYcrnor-Eea-
eral. On the rights OF that potentate. Paimerston
had mol asked the Ccupsoys leave % conclude N
treaty, ard be took rotce Of their aunalhcs re-
so,nt;or. Der wss the King Of Dude informed
tLs. tie treaty bad ever been Cancelled. The 10
proved by Lord Dslhousie hmsef (m'nute Jan D
Ie;6j: at is vesy probable that the krg' Ia sae
course of tie ciscu. sons which vii take
take plsce With the Resitent, may refer 70 the
treaty regotisted with his predecessor in 1857;
"tie Resident is swaIO that tho treaty
.svss not Continued IN force, having been sanu'is1
"bv thu Court Of Directors as soon az it was re-
..c:eyed N England. Tie Resident is further
"aaal. that although the King OF Onde WAS m
.oImei "a. the tue that rtsn agsravatDs pro-
"y;.i,Ls OF tie treaty of 1887. respechog an in-
creased m,itsry force, would not be carried into
effect the sn',re 0Jrogaton u n 'rdS nsrer COM
mu, icated 10 MS Majesty. Tbs elect 81 this re-
selye and want Of full communication Is felt to
L" BE- embarrassing to-day. II is the more emoar-
"Is.sipg that tie Cancelled assignment was stu
" induced in volume Of treaties which WAS puo-
q" iisatJ ia iclj by tho authority OF Government.
In the sane minute, sec. Il, it is said: " II the
Kiug should allude to the treaty of 1881, and
should ssh why if further measures are neces-
" Soy in relation to the administration Of Dude,
" tho large powers which are g'eh to tie British
"GCsernm. MT by tie said treaty should nor now
bs put in force his Majesty must be Informed
that tho treaty Las had no existence siace Il was
cemu unicated 10 the Court of Directors, by
whom it was wholly annuled. HIS Slsjesty will
" BIZ reminded that the Court OF Lucknow was
I" informed at the time that certain articles OF tho
treaty of 1887 By which TIE payment of an adj
I" itiOI al military force was imposed upon tho
King, were to be get aside. II must De pre-
sumsd that it was not thought necessary at that
" time TO make suy communication to bis Majesty
regH dirg those articles of the treaty which were
not of immediate operation, and that the subse-
quent con- munication inadvertently neg
"ltcttd."
But not ou,y was this treaty inserted in the
official collection of leiI it was also officially ad-
yerted to 80 s subsstirg treaty in Lord Aucklaads
notification to TIE Kiug Of Dude dated July 8,
lc39; IN Lord HardiDge's (then Governor.G oneral)
Itmo0. trsrce To toe same King, Of November %,
~, ard ia Col. Sieemin's PRESIDENT at Lucknow
ccuu uuication 10 Lord DalhOusie himself, OF tho
lO' December. 1851. Now, why was LORD Dal.
uth'!o 50 tdStI 10 ucby tho ''i"!ty vi Ac"t.
VII Oh el his predect ssors and even his Hn agents
had acknow edgei to be in force in their comuuni-
cations with the King of Dude Solely because,
by tits treaty, whatever pretext the King might
give for Interference, that Interference was limited
to al assumption OF government by British officers
IN tie name Of tie King Of Onde who was to re-
ctive the surplus revenue. That was the ve'y op-
IL .th ahNr NJ
Ge1aion would do. This denying the validity Of
treaties " hch had formed TIE acknowledged base Of
intercourse for twenty years; this seiziOg violently
upon IN open inirac!io0 even
of the scknos LEGGED treaties; this frsl coOfscation
of every acre Of land in tue whole country; all
thee treocberous ard brutal modes OF p,Ocee ling
OF the Biti.b toward the natives of India are now
beginning to ayeDge themselves, not only III ind'''
but in Ers gland.