Lynchburg daily Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1852-1861, 1858-10-29
Judge Douglas Coalition last Winter with
the Black Republicans.

We copy from the jackson !Massissippiaa the
following article taken from the Philadelphia
lEsansypanias. Tho Rnnsy'rdnian. as our read
srs know. is Democratic organ ofhigh character
and long standing Upon the authority of men
who are avouched to be reliable, Judge Douglas
stands convicted Of an attempted coalition with
the Black Republicans to defeat Mr.. Green Of
Missouri Of reelection to the Senate. and to put
that notorious Frecsoer. Francis p Blair, Jr.. in
his place. When it is recollcctcd that Mr.. Green
was the champion Of the Lecomp'on Constitution
in tho Senate, and was frequently brought into
collision with Douglas in debate, and on more
than one occasion, Inundated aud dsgraced Doug
las (who is an arrant coward) before the whole
Senate--we may. perhaps. find the clue to tho vim
dictiye proposition which Douglas made to colfax,
for the purpose of having Green defeated
We ask the reader to weigh carefully tho sug-
gestions of the following artcle-and we may say
we expect to be fortified, in day or two, with I'D
dilional proof Of this shameful and shameless
transaction:
From The Pennsylvaninn
Serious Charge against Senator Douglas.
Isaac H. Sturgeon. ESQ.,. in letter to Mr.. N.
Paschall, which appeard in The st. Louis Repnbli-
can of the 22d, max the following serious charge
against Senator Douglas We call attention to
the charge AZ furnishing evidence on which to
found belief that Senator Douglas is directly i'm
alicated in the attempt made by The New York
Tribune and other leading AboitionIst papers to
re-clcct him to tho Senate Of the United States.-
The return which Senator pougns was To make
for this MD from the AbolItonists IN set forth by
the Senator himself II was the defeat Of Jim
Green" and the election of the notorious \. =.
lI.;r L. ,,,b M r,lI ia
tract from the letter to which We refer:
I'm my former reply to Col Kcnnet stated
that +. Z. Blair Jr., had written n letter to Is.
Grntz Brown, editor of Tho Missouri Democrat,
which in substance sustained all the charges pre-
ferred by The jefferson Examiner--lat Tho New
York Tribune the lending Abolition paper Of this
country counscled its friends to mike no oppos-
ton To Mr.. Douglass return To the United States
Senate. | well knew that it would never have
made this without most satisfactory assurances
from Judge Douglas
- call upon Mr.. Blair Ia state whether he did
not write such letter to Mr.. Brown? call upon
hun 10 state whether the substance oi all the char
gcs made by The Examiner against Judge Douglas
are not true call upon him, and call upon Mr.
Colrax Of Indiana, To state whether Mr.. Blair did
not receive an invitation through Mr. cnllax,
Member Of Congress from lnlann. to call upon
him Douglas and whether the message, as it
came 10 HIM from the lips oi Judge Douglas, WIS
nor -" 1,H Mr. Blair rash 10 ser lam rush 10
gierhim Jim Green's p'dcr IN Mc ia'led Stairs
SeHate"
Il call upon Mr. Blair to statcnll chat took place
Mt that interview. | call upon all with whom
Judge Douglas spoke on this subject To- give To the
country the Information they may possess. 1t is
due 10 the people of Illinois that they should not
be deceived and it is due to Judge Douglns, that
if the charges be not true he should be acquitted.
Think Of IL man shouting over Blalrs defeat by
Hamlet who was willing to lend his aid to put 7.
T. Blair. Jr', in the United States Senate in the
place Of our great, gallant.able defender, James s.
'reen. What hypocrisy
is there Democrat in Missouri whocs blood
Ices not run red hot through his veins in the con
o,nplation of such dupicity! Iappca to all who
rave knowledge in their breasts in regard To the
hargcs made in The Examiner. 10 come for
ward and give in their testimony. II Judge
Douglas be guilty let him he condemned and if
lot let him be acquitted. care not what in iunc-
ion of secresv may have been imposed, the matter
has now assumed that phase that tho truth eaa-
not witt, propriety be withheld Ivy any man.
The charge Of Mr.. Sturgeon il boldly made
over his own signature, the witnesses arc called
to tho stand by name, AMI they must answer yes
or no to tho questions. Senator ihugln. has been
and srlaying hazardous game, budding too high
for the place he holds. The invitation from
l'puplhS 10 u PROMINENT Diuck INluiEithi ~
Missouri, sent through leading member of the
party in Illinois. und the oLi1ct Of the pro
posed interview, are all links IN chain Of evil
dcnce which it vii be difficult nr Senator Doug
las to break. The fact that the Senator wished to
defeat theparty in Missouri. aud place in the Sen
ate of tho United States bitter aud uneompro-
missing enemy of the Democratic party and its
principles, furnishes tie stand point from which
to view all his actions upon the subject. His at
tacks upon the President. his hYcak with the Ma
tonal Democracy his utilization with the Black
"kcpublcans," his abandonment Of the bred
Scott decision, all part of this scheme. which
was to he opened to f. p. Blair, .Ir., in the inter
view solicited. This is new l;h; upon the path
OF Senator Douglas; and the National Democracy
in all sectors of the country will read his past
and present course by it's ilumnojicn
A Portrait of Jehu.
The New Orleans Delta has the following first
rate notice of the great jchu G.. Jones. who was
recently defeated for Congress in IL District con
tanning 1000 Democratic majority: