The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-08-03

sgainst me- you informed Hon John Kelly that whole
agent and that at mis- suggestion you bad the aVcsuga
In January he ayiOr) was dong he could ~ con-
nectou with you defeat Collect Schel, may De
by Tho ioo~ing letter which have no ided hio
wlsmScroS cuY, Jan. 10, 1855.
DEAR sn~- cannot address Mr.. scnolf Oh
any subject he pays attention N any ono secretary
Cobb ADD the President both are dissatisfied with no
done ter Tho members Tho sccr-tary VIII INTERFERE
In directing appointments, but he viii no, rsy ihose not
satisfactory 10 the members. A. sincere friend OF Mr..
schcl | regret hs course but / cannot comrtiu frat
There Ia, however, a storm brewing wnicn vil sbake
the walls OF that Custom House. Yours, Sc, .
To lion. STEPHEN u Dni.aYE GEORiS TANLoN
And be- like you. having opposed Mr. scneil loug a.
there the remoest proepecs Of defeating HIN, wn,n
bet every respect traitors their testimony who
choose 70 70 dol am NOT enc o. the number. nespsed
by his moot intimate scquantances knov Of no reason
WIN Me-. Horace " CLARK another n your friends,
shah enter into controversy win simply turn him
20 bis friend Stephen T. RUSSELL only permitting my
sef 10 say thai IL Ia very difficult matter, when
has potoriously betrayed his principles and bis
party, to beirsy his friends.
NEW York, July $, 1866.
SrprrKss H. DntaYE ESQ -
Drsn sIR hsvo your note Of yesterday, IN which you
request me to sAie the facts rciaive TO nv obtsuing
the signature Of tho Hon. Horace " Clark 70 the letter
OF February 20 1862 10 the Secretary OF the Tressury
relative 10 certain charges made AGAINST you by Ionn
Guthrie, E.q, specsl Agent Of the Treasury, under
IN reply, have to state that In my conversations with
Mr. Clark, relative 70 your casc carefully repened 70
bin the substance Of each charge made against
YOU and also the substance Of the testimony Furnished ~
ron In regulation OF the
Referring 70 the remark IN Mr.. Cinks letter 70 MI.
Guthrie that the fact OF Official borro wing money from
merchants, Who have appeals pending before such official
IL u1ciept cause for mis- removal from office, would
that this concufon must have been arrived o.
AFTER having ssched his signature 10 the paper 10 ques
titn for not only called his Especial attention 70 the
charge made against you Of having borrowed money from
merchants, but expressed my dsappobaton OF your con
orct this respect aud my regret At the necessities wnh
compelled you 70 DO Mr. Clark may have signed the
certificate without due confederation, bat he did not DO 90
without having been fully informed OF all Of the fac 10
the case including the fact thai you admitted having Dor
rowed money from merchants, ard tina, many OF your
fends, myself among ths number, Thought you had IN
this btes ndscreet but that the re- payment OF all the
moneys 90 borrowed proved your honesty. .,
Yours, truly, p RUSSELL"
Mr.. Diaye concludes HE letter thus And now sir,
few words a. 70 your completely with sckes, Hart CO..
and sbail close my communicates not because nave
not olics Of evidence, which hold in reserve for
but because have proved the against ycu and have
already occupied too much space
stated ,hsrsasops N ny letter Of june s. Which led