New-York daily tribune., 1858-12-13

a q.
Vi. n-nJer w,.h eest1r- 1t r.rqlal' s.f''i-h.
r..,, ciut.luei: "Nr>t J i-r.i .i-pT ~ hy p-'cti
Tlss 2 I i0st ny reason nrd ,5-s .es0s ID t--
ID r.ial4 what the Com, Mcilsf ,sD 4 3. that
corn -. "a :, b, construed a.'Hck1g the Govern
uclf hecru-e ks VIII ro' - Ia hiach "a Haie7
WY t. is the hoast Of b. ,,o.eramsnt th,t hrs
rred fb,Iy or "Idf r-atj hsa Joue e', n say,
fi. q. ,n %, cor set L. the lfrn'l p"ppci Hcdths |
,,, rot L.,e 70 tery. ie- r. incs has -alGlia',d
br1 .rn liberty. That Is fsct shich soine peops
may aid others may not regret os u Il a't >tiol-
al T. hold il II cftense in sny ote = sta'e the simple
" fart thst Ubc-.y does rat pow exist. NJ. bIry's
n..D examined IN 1eial tn different hotds ~ Tie
q elsaton ard urged thst no one Of them "ns h'roe
oui by any rRsssge IA the Nii'"' =" wv -
ga,1 10 n. De Mont iembs7ti severe r,nstk9 np1n
.@rviie haiterers and h.nyrTs-on oi an'e-nsAnc'S,
i was lo atsa.k upon The piessn; Government OI'
upan q cia.s of u en Who existed uuder 'l -Ne7n-
reuts. lie sId Lie Immediate Ifiends Fsfs men
rho bad 'asen les'e Of ambiuon' ana r'il'ea o. ,
hol ors; bni if Sere IN tie n,bit OF frcqu nns vac
nrt, lau herr ( palaces BE- sure q n re sho.l
f, in then now the faces which be ranonpfeH
vears $50 among the wrllg aduiators OF former ''os
,tlnefis CoMiug 20 tie most important cJIps II tle
irnc'melt-tass Of an attack on "ihe risSts 90 tne
Emperor ~ Dr. the Constitution ard the principle o.
"uiivrrsa ulia. be would ro 'e to demo .tr ',i"n
that there scrap Of a~ 20 supp ntl,. lls &c:
eu.s:ir entirely based uppn law ~ toiH 2sssl
20 ~ ect from attacks end -isuls the tHsia'Jn oI
The Hcptblc Siih 4 Pres'fcn; 'or ienr y"ls. liow
could hat law be applicable - lhe bSpife "oI,1
il he replied, bv ansiogy' This nas his answer; 10
1919 "A law cOncheG ID sorl,w n, nh.r HHgWs" WIS
,as..d 20 prreet ihs ch,r,r e." ths 'rsra'ion graft
ei y Loui- XVIII. of his sovereign 3ll aod mere
motion by vntle OF "his rights by birth. j.o4s
AVII syYrre e. mniutaiu ''is charter, sod ne
k.pt his oath. I.aus inter a ID sensihoa III tphI+
Wien Il e Revolution OF 1880 took place, u hover
occurred 30 my laWyer or statesman t1at 'ne
lag Of 1919, made for charter az grapted,
by King by right Of birth. cout be ap 'Acs-
be 10 the constitutional monMcny OF the no des
FsGsfais, and accordingly lows Pni'llprs "".eFn-
n@bt ps'sai a nes lGw 10 q similar effect. ASsn, IN
- :. ] n.. n-..fyn Nv
WIS passed for the protection ~ that Con'Stu'ioni
and sbtn IN 1919 the form Of Govern lent vas a. an
q eDgsd though not in any such rad3A manner IS u
r,s sUbseGuenilyin 1882, another law was jassed 70
meet IN. circumstance. Ii The present Government
had re rii r, new that Law II their AZ fault
hn tls, reason Why they shonlo tispouse with
all law, aud, acting upon purely arbitrary prncp'si,
condemn n man merely bccausa be was o0roNous. ie
cnr included by brilliant and mpas.ionel peroratiou,
which ! yill not attempt to quote from.
Wien ". B-JTyrr sat d0~u, lOud, numerous, Gni
simulisne, ere; Of Bravo hnIst forth from the
lower end Of the court. The President ordered the
police 10 turn out any vho had lroei in the man
lie, alton they could bnd him, aud threatened %
cenr the court the outrage should b. repeated W.
Nllleman, tLe perpetual secretary Ot the Academy,
arproschei NJ Berfytr, and squeezing his hand said,
You we're never in your Ike hner either at tile oar
" or IN the tribune
A. this stage the Cour. rose for half IN aonr.
An tTr1pg sGcut Sss uaJe that the Proc1reur | n
peritl shrul5 reply to NJ. Berryer a. that W.
Dnfsure would then gay few words for W. Douniol
ani reply oon ths whole case.
The ProcnIeur inprrnis reply, which dd not last
more than quarter OF an bpuT, eys9 les effective
tbao 's op. nj, speech. lie scarcely touched the
specific charges OF b. prosecution or the p)Sertr
Il srtr that had teen made - them. tie rrler tiei
lie assertion that French institutions were better thaa
IL .l ores ard d;ha' II anti tr pCh e say 10 the
contrary. Ilo ,aupted M lie AOntaembert std hayiug
fprmeIy voted 'Or thn'tpg mp tho Paris cnbs, aud
ask > vh-tneT bis aimira ION for Ensaod led hlmto
approve d Engi-h political meetuss- to
sk fliah NOR 81 l.l
any oih'r. He cited, ~ io'ta0ces of Tue Immense
da ger e srch meetings. some % the raoionoo tade
which " DISCUSSION forum men sometimes nduged /
ip, and which III EUgant * ites no attention what
ever lie fastened opon oppression Of u. Ne MDnta-
lembs-t canfiOIipg England against jvcf-9Onildrnce
IN her own strergih, and advising her - keep NJ
nayal ald military force pr0pO,tNDed to the large
forces of despoisnl, ani founded rpon il the absurd
cl,rge that W. De Mont ,lembert wished 10 see war,
and would take part with England agsust his o.n
country.
D. uni0l p mere working ira1esmsn, who lately
q compost r on the ground Of his )Oi character
aId Cotunl ignorance Of the article for which no
responsible, severely reproved the Procnreur Imperial
ior the yiy iDcompeeness o his speeches for the
prosecution. BE lN. - Difaure could find nothing in
them seriously deserving of an ans yer. The Procu
IAp, rial seemed to thiuk that reading here and
there passage from the article in most cursOry way
was sufficient formaIity to Justify condemnation, !
witaout pointing out, as he was bound TO dc the par
ticuar passages which fell withio the scope Of the
laws referred to in them. If the Procureur had read
the arcle carr fully he would have thar the had
i.g idea it was 10 defend the religions policy Of the
Core dant against that OF the Uhigers and the
Lelituis journals who decriel the Engisb alliance !
and extolied the cutthro1ts Of Cawnpore and Luck
pow. NJ. De NoItaembert had replied 10 four
furious articles VI the CRrers which had APP
reared bat short time before the number OF /
tie Core pondaW now in question lie denounced /
the MIR mO.tnue ard retIOgrade policy of the tat- |
with burning Indignation, ani -ad thst the |
C0rrsSpohdonl defended rational religion rnch as it
lad been understood by Mi the nobrst aud best men
H. France for ages sssina, journals who gored in the
massacre Of 81. Bartholomew, and jaatited the reyo
cat IN u The Edict of Nantes. As instance of the
li'lle thou, ht which the Procnreur Inperiai had
be.tOged upon the case he ssid tbst The charge OF
II DC Mortelembert having alluded TO the Z nperor
wher he talked OF government of al ante-cnnu- |
ber refu,e, itself. II ever there man whose
habits self reliant and solitary, il was the En-
pefOr. That he might say of him. without being |
waiting in proper respect. The Emperor gas wont |
10 dtclde NEST important questions witnont taking
much counsel and uen auitr against the opinions Of
those nearest 10 HIM. His former Ministers itIrIing
t"U ard ". OjillDn Barrof tell iltlo about
this. \ iangh.l NJ. Dnta1re recapItuated and re- |
forced WIN crushing logic the Arguments Of NJ. |
BeJyer showing that the ew Of 1919 could not be |
applicable 70 tie present Imperial Constitution Il
would be a sfIarg ge thing, h. sad, II NJ de Monta-
nbert were u BE- condemned for havlog Is |
msDtci he loss Of liberty of the press, liberty of
the tribune, &C., under la8 passef for the express
rnrp0fe % pr,tectirg those very nsttaton. from /
stacks. H referred with humor q tho -. .gricOrs
ua'rre Of universal mirage, which IN the coure %
very few years h5d sanctioned R-pubi'; with
ssyer,i ign chamber, Republic with cra nber an P
PresiceI' i0r fpnr years With concurrent p0yeT'.
rroiird R-plD.c With Pretent for ten gears. aud /
ii y prrseIt In p.Ie. II I, regret -ome Of the
Ieslt- of universal suffrage Was 70 0s construed asn
attack upon i.s principles, ther. few men in /
FTsrce nbn had not attacked it within very ebert