The daily exchange. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1858-1861, 1858-06-24

time certain goods and merchandise there
exposed for sale by him therein, to wit spurious liquors.
10 WIZ Whlskey brandy, rum and gn and fermented Ii
quof 10 w.t. wine porter ale cider and beer other than
lager beer without first obtaining license do in the
manner prescribed by the act of Assembly in such
made and provided not being then and there the grower
maker or manufacturer of the said specific articles
aforesaid therein exposed for sale; contrary form
of the act of Assembly in such case made and provided
anu against the peace government and dignity of the
ing motion:
The State having selected the sixth count of the in
uce ana having stated in open Court here, that said
count Is paSed on the act of 1883 chapter 44 the
Herser ny ms counsel now respectfully suggests to the
Court here that whereas by express requirement
the eleventh section of said act duty of
e "rnd Jury to endorse the back of the indictment
The name of the nformer; vet in fact AS the said ira
verser respectfully suggests the name Of the informer is
NOT endorsed on the said indictment as upon inspection
WILL pny appear wherefore the said traverser, by his
counsel prays the Court here quash the said indict
meht as having been rregulary found and returned.
Alter the question had been argued by the
eeh side OF the controversy the Court overrued
oh Tor the reason that the endorsement of the Sheriff as
lhiormer upon the indictment designed merely to Sc
cure to the ntormer the fine prescribed by the law and
~ nor s.ae te Indictment as that was based upon other
and sufficient testimony.
The counsel for the traYerser then submitted the ow
ing motion:
The traverser by his counsel respectfully suggests to
the Court here land he is ready maintain and prove the
truth Of the said suggestion by competent
that the indictment in this was found on the nforma
ton of Thomas Creamer, ESD Sheriff of Baltimore cty
whereby said sheriff as such nformer in ease Of ba con
vcton of said traverser entedby the express proyis
ions of the act on which the said indictment is found to
the one half of any fine that be imposed by the Court
and the said traverser further suggests Court here
that on the 10th day of May last another indictment was
found and returned against the said taverser which said
last mentioned Indictment is depending IN Court here
for trial and is hased the of Assembly and is
for the like alleged offence charged in this Indictment
and on the back of which said indictment found
sd 10Th day of May last the said Sheriff
the inormer And the said traverSer respectfully further
suggests to the Court here that the petit Jurors now at
tending the Court the trial of issues here depending
Thomas and
who was and the promoter of said prosecution against
him the said traverser.
And the said tavcrser further suggests that besies
the two indictments, hereIbeoFe to, are
now depending in Court here for trial large number
other indictments, to wit: upwards of hundred
dctmens against various other parties, all Of which
based on the Act of Assembly which the indict
ment In this case is hase and all of which said other in
dcments are respectively endorsed the backs thereof
that the Sheriff aforesaid the nformer said several
cases respectively; and which said other indictments
also found and returned before tho said petit Jurors
now attending the Court here aforesaid summoned
by the said Sheriff.
Wherefore the said traverser by his counsel challenges
the said petit jury, attending the Court here the
same stands arrayed in the panel and prays that the sug
geSton aforesaid if denied may be heard and determined
by triers to be selected by this Honorable Court
the said panel attending aforesaid may be
aside; and that jury may be summoned in this be-
hall by the proper officer, &c
The motion argued length by Mr. Preston for the
taveser and will be further argued by Messrs Whitney
for the State and Schey for the averser this morning
SUPERIOR CoURT.-Hon. z. Collins Lee, Judge-The
following business was transacted yesterday:
James Wright and Sarah Bryan as Louisa Wright Ad
minstratriX of Samuel J Wrght-isSucs from the Or
phan's Court of Baltimore City On trial,
COURT OF COMMON PIEAs'-Hon Robert N Martin
special Judge The following business was transacted
yesterday:
Classon and Webster rs. Williamson, before reported
appeal from Justice Myers. The jury this case being
unable to discharged from the further
alton of the subject.
VIM. W Mcclellan rs. Abraham Harris-appeals from
Justice King. Judgment affirmed in cases.
Same rs. Same-appcas from Justice King. Judgment
reversed in seven cases.
The trial calendar will be taken up Monday next .s
CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CIrY.-IIon VIM Geo
Krebs Judge The following business was transacted
yesterday:
H. NJ. Reynolds trustee, Casper Miller and others
bill to set aside deed in favor of credorSheretof0re
reported Further argued by Reynolds complain