Weekly Council Bluffs bugle. (Council Bluffs, Iowa) 1857-1860, 1858-04-14

lzaxss nss& - &sS - C
sakas ID r. saa ID - lass aaaas we
saak - saisae - 49, ~ ewa psspo.
siaisn sd sasw sasaa ID s0sEasR nuua-
- II - kaaa i falas pass sAaR 81
sAasy - arsfsl doagaE eonsssaas -
- aamiaalan shaa - DO been wEons
II i posasian wAiah " ID bsEesa aAkaa.
For, naps hsasaa shaas 10 sdis5s a. sae
HEparasl kAcws, sAaa By aakaEng hina up
- aaswa psspszisasn, ~ 90 not 80
lslT aamsa sAaa 80 err RS wgong
Dus nalghbee danlss any aasenps On
Aia psrs ID espsss - imprauaiea thai thags
was swiaals psaasicea il 10 Qouss
Haaae aehsaana, aaa saks = = eoessoa
Or aAaasmaps upon thAa point Il -.
psy - viii say ahas chr residing is A.
asaisas aaass Ne Asaa ssOensa House
osessisn, = puhisaAsd II Ais papss II 30
27sh AasaAs - = y bsaisFa Ia =
wss sndsavosiag 10 arsass "a aforesaid
iapssaslon. Ha said Id shas article
W askAowaedgs oar iaaAkliay - dsiearn
tAp relsvansy a shs pehlaeaasen 81 tie
luouss Housa contract " shs qnaaaion
u Issue, aAlaas ID i daaignd ae make
sasrs mAnifess she iapiissty and aniaith-
fuluesa ii ahe Gsusy Judge
We woald ask oar eanaid{Pl egtsmpa-
ray il ths impression ia nos created in The
fesgoing sxsEaaA ihaa dnplisisy lad been
pracsiesd By the ooaaty Judge, and aha'
the pablioasioa II sAa sonirses was in.
seadsd 70 make ID mora mapitnaaY Il
sAs Ceanty Judge was guilty Dc daPiici-
b in making the contrasss did hg moi
pEasaise swindis In thRl aEausasaion
our eoasmporasy aading himaslfin 9
sisht place asssnpss 70 dodge out, py In
ssspslaAing tAs word oaly, inao his fEsi
position.
II the County Jadgs was ths only par
b 10 swindls ha ahoula bear ths whsIt
blans--who doubts it2 But No sAinl
aAa interpolation Of the word osalg, makes
atstnsarksa iiAeraaos'a in chs aanas and
rsadiaa 81 bis Esss position.
Our AsikAheE was speaking Of sht
Court House contrast, and had he read
Douglas On contracts carefully, be would
hAVs diseovessd, sAaa his interpolation
would avail him nosAing, in has atsempI
10 dodge Gus Of his false position.
Doaggasa says, sfTksEs ars several
things essential to av&lid coAagaat--be-
Sides o yalnabls consideration, il must
b. BY and between tpo parties capable
Of contracting TO do or forbsaE to do q
lawfal aca,"
Then il follows ahAa aAazs must have
been two or more parties 10 the Court
House contract, and il swindle Wa
perpesrated thas the blame must attach
70 all the parties 60 the same.
We asked tAs editor TO give LIS hi
agtHion whether swindis WA psEpssEa-
ted in the Csurs House contract, Her
fuses 20 answer eatagoElsaIly bus refers
as 10 thu files OF ahe NoapaTsSl,. where
he says We wiu discover 81 answer 70
all his (our) inssrogatoEiss- We have
made the examination, and hnd ths fol-
lowing explicit and satisfactory answer
''Ws express no opinioa in regard 30 tht
validity Of shs contract, " wa hare
usoahing to say about tbs Esasonahisness
OF unrsas0nableness, Of the price agreed
upon for the construction Of asid build,
lag"
Greas 10 the opinion Of tha whsug,
doodle Of the Eoaparei47 We also ask
ed him 10 give his sentiments In relation
t. the purchase Of Poor Farm-wheth-
eE there was any swindling IN that pup
chase, aud if so, should she taheLs blame
or oaly the greatest blame attach to you5
County Judgef
We have examined the flas Of th5
NoapeFsil ander tbs Assurance Of the ed
itor that We would discover an answer
% the above intsrogatoEy, and IS usual
find the following explicit and ehaEaet-
ssiatfa suskeT
''The issue naturally growing cat Of
the purchase, and subsequent rapadia-
ton by she Cownty Judge, of q trasi Of
land for a County Poor Parm, has been
sac all observing topia Of discussion du-
ring tha past week. We do nos propose
nov 10 say sught in regard 10 the merits
Of ths question:"
We acknowledge that our ''penesra-
tion,'' fails Us in this case, and We are
unable TO ssdiasaysE chs apsnasa" Of tAe
opinion given, TO the question: pFoPoun-
asd.
We still hare hopes ahAa ouE neighbor
viii nos lack ''dirsefnsss," whun be full
fls line premise contained in the follow
ias wAioh We take from his issue Of the
18Th Of March
Provided d csstain issue new pend-
Ing, resnlh favofably 10 The inteesgsa of
tbs Caumky, ws ahan hare soaeshing
more 10 ssy in relation " this (the Peof
Farn) and other matters deeply affecting
thu fwturs wslfass Of the County,
Did that issue result favorsbiy io the
interests Of the Counsy Was The or
dsx fos the fling IT q nsw bond By The
Prosecuting Attorney, and In ease Of
fallase % epnplys The subsequent
Of 3 certain Black RSpab-
liaaa, sha issue sAen spending ~ Has
shs alma ii sAs nsw hond knocked the
wind ons 81 your sAiIs, and silenesd
pour thunder9
Great ia4As whaAg- aoaAlsng shs Non
paSssl, tur be snail bsasAsa saAny auas-
Gioas, and b. ahall opaa hia la0ash and
speak faa aha riak u bia psraonal aad
prfvsts righssn - asves whaAg decide
'paks before.
Newa saaamaaxy.
- ms soarlst ssssr Il prssaiiilszg 10.
= ii & u Il + ~