The daily Butte record., 1858-04-06

For once, the Judge is partially right, it
is radical Tor it deals in first principles, aud
declares that che who sows, shall reap. =
That the miner shall enjoy the result Of his
labor and his enterprise it deals in princj-
pies and not mere rules. 1t regards laws
made for men and great interests, and that
they must be construed to sub3erve this i'm
p0rtant end. # is not agrarian (for that
begs the question: The Judge cannot pass
that off for argument, that would presume
the mines belonged to Fremont and the Su-
preme Court were distributing them among
the miners, they deny the premises. it is
obstructive" Of no great interest, any other
decision would crush alike the miner with all
industrial employmeuts interviewer with
that greatest interest, that effects not this
State alone but the entire Union, and while
a change in the Supaeme Courts decision
would strike down as with paralysis these
great interests here, its benumbiug effects
would be felt every where. But says the
Judge "Mexico with a view te its own best
policy, exempted all mines from following
the ownership Of the lands - "But we have
never anoptel that system" what not
adopted her systc'n in regard to the gold
mines in respect to reseryng the mines and
the right to mine to the State. that VIC have
nov copied the laws / admit; bat that the
necessities Of the country dictated this sys-
ten so uumistakably that there is not now
and never will be suiicien; power in any or
all the departments Of the government to af-
feet auy permanent change must insist
The judges charge that the Supreme Court
has 'iuaugeratei into "A rule. highway sez-
ures Sc" could have been dictated only by
the most profound ignorance anl an assu-
] pay "a &, To- -
to carry him through with impuuity. Such
language deserves the sevcrost puni.hmant
within the power Of the court. What an cX.
ample should some attorney having more
talent ut douanciati0n than ut argument 70
before the Supreme Court and initiate this
example, can that court fine him not US t.
/ ly, for it is bound to treat all alike; the lat
ter might plead ignorance, the Judge can
/ inl no such excuse.
/ In the case Of Wclch ys. Sullivan, eX JUS
tice Bennett used some severe structures II
regard to OK Justice lloylenlcldt ahd among
/ them was the fJiloHing :-'lIJw dangerous
/ it is tlr n person to enioav0ur to sh y him
self wiser than others upon a subject OF
which hcis entirely ignorant both a. respects
the laW and the i1uguarr anl ait2rwArl
make his own folly a matter of self cJnE"at
ulAtipn.' This was porl;c: moderation com
pared with Judge II.'5 abuc of the actual
members ofthe Court. But JIlge Murray
gave Bennett most evcrc castigltion, and
comphmca;ed lIoyleufellt t. an extent that
he really thinks he has hut to iulicste his
opinions AMI if the Court docs not fall in
with them, he i not treated with the con
/ 'ilpratiou lie de crvls he at once become,
/ indignant, lets n most dangerous example
/ hy abusing the Court in mlunur tuat il
others should follow it, they woull DO it al
their peril. No man knows the rules of law
so well a' the judge, and no one knows bet
ter how to ma'shlI those rules to form clost
! argument, but on the other hand we hav,
no jd'.st Of aay cou.ideratioug Within the
state who has SO lttlo knowledge Of "Rudi
caE priaclP'es Of Gie yight Of pr0pctty o
the great interests Of the State; or OF thost
gre"t mlXims suhservcut t. which al metc
rules must ycil as this same distinguished
il3i.t.