New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-01-22

Nc would show By sudcrcs u IL when n, q .e,,o.
conveyed his property 20 IT, j. b. he charges hn IL
fsy hr. Robertson INA. Lac: Summer, to comrets
eunanseme"ts os vas making with the Z9 GERMAN
Bank, NJ n. called upon J. Bcgler 20 gre bin re.
curty for the 8, 100 advanced 10 hs father, and
vac pressing and urging ths upon him w.
being necessary 70 be done, Nd if not done
ar early q. tho let OF October, he gave him moe
tme-lO, w or W days. This wac tie object which
would BE- Oh: of hls reach uness he could &C rh
his AIM. wac hs, and not his wife death, which
waste be accomplished wttnths time; .ha: Re would
prove That j. Bieger, when asked how he ret, M
along, @C., SAID that Robertson had advanced h o.
between $lO00 and 5000 for his father aud TIA,
Robertson was urging security, but tina. he hsd the
cores so tight around him. II Lis friends would stand
by him, he would not pay i, but make the money
come from the other way.
He also ssd tina: RomsI.6 Hart WAS as mean q
maj az Robertson, for lie had prosecuted b.s is.he
when he was in trouble, and ina. be would disgrace
him through the dissrace of h.+ daugt ter. and il
appears that the first time Mss Har;s name was
coupled with Eobertsone IVES il the State Pris by
old BIegler TO David MckGy There WINS the origin
of tins iniqui,y. NcW what Was the Object IL IL
clear that If Robertson could he convicted here, he
voucher b, has would he good iur anything against
Begler in such case. lie had therefore az interest
Of g., 700 in the result of this trial.
Some time in June last, while Young Beg,er was
helping TO hatch this Internal plot, and his la'hef
attempting o &c; evidence that he did not produce
abortion on Emile Muir, and endcavoring 10 get re-
leased from prison by making it appear that sbe was
,educed by some other person, this scheme was eV
IDENTIFY all prepared-the two things beng connected
and b,enledso as throw the disgrace OF the thing
upon Robertson. Three persons will prove frequent
personal collisions between the old and young BIGGER
hat the latter accused h.s father of using violence
toward his sister, and Of numbering his mother IN
London, while on his way Ia ting country. He SAID
biz father was guilty Of the charge against him.
They asked him why he did not disclose the name 81
the act ua offender lie replied they were in his power,
that the man pref tended TO he their friend but wa
their mortal enemy Some Ofthe young men said, "lt'
d. Is. Robertson, and you are d0c'orDg his wife, are
Won not r. 10 said there scheme being con-
cocted which would he revealed some day and when
il came out it would make the city trembe. Relative
to the evidence that Robertson in Beger house
on the evening when Scarf and Mclean there, it
would be proved that he was in the bank and Other
places these evenings, ana at hours which would
preclude the possibility of his being the person over
heard but not by any inmate. OF the seduction
of Emile MUIR by old Dr. Bieger. conclusive evidence
would be adduccd. Several witnesses proved Mr..
Robert sons character and standing for years and Mr.
Roswell Benedict fully sustained the statement OF the
defense far he concerned. As did also Mrs.
Hannah Benedict, Mr.. Sarah Winston and Mr.. Oscar
Benedict.
Mrs Robertson. wife Of the accused cOntradicted
several .. tn. statements Of Joseph Bcgcr and uly
sI- aimed the statement of Dr. MartiDdale opening
the defense.
The verdict of the Jury in this case already
nounced Ivy telegraph from Rochester, wa. "Nst
fiHU(u,'