The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-08-01


heved Of the embarrassment through the I've per
the annual sales of the public lands which by ne term
he sales win in III prosssny, smoun 70 .TS
millions OF dollars each year, Tor the mkt 70
come, the revenue 70 be derived from that W ~
amount 10 huno red one hundred and Mt ga
dollars which will be ample for all legitimate purpose Of
On ecorcmicsl State government By the terms OF
dnance We will not be permitted 70 enter the Uoioo until
obtain the population necessary for one
in Congress-, il We shall reject may be- said e,s
will get the five per cent whenever are admitted, and
that therefore will oose nothing by s rejection rois
may be true in legislative declaration: but NJ all IA
mar with the facts must know that by the time we GET
the necsssy PSpn,son most II MT all the v.a onu
Of the five per cent will be quite small II Is ALSO well
known that preempors and purchasers select the bes
lands and that only those Of Indifferent quality will be on
band at that period This revenue, coupled with ths
pepse 70 our people.
peks, Leavenworth and Lecompton constitutions
and rays the Lecompton constitution Ia nothing
tons, and il in the main an excellent instrument
In reference TO the slavery clause be says that IL did
not exist the bill would not be Objectionable TO majority
Of the people OF Kansas but he very logically adds thai
there Is not, in the Territory out OF It,
number Of the people who entertain the hope of peea
that end. the battle 10 fought and Won by the free
State party and all true however aoxioas they may
have been to make Kansas slave State, by resort 70
Of the majority. So then there IL no party organize
ton TO perpeuate slavery here rhe free State party
b are IN The majority, and time prevent II.
But suppose the Lecompton constitution should heson1
the supreme law and perm anepty remain SUCH does
every ore know that would give no sctusl vitality to
slavery That institution cannot exist solely from the fact
Of It's federation parchment, nor merely by cpnsti
tutional recognition. requires much !. requires
sxisepce in fact in numbers and tho passsge laws
by the Legislature to protect IT, Aud now such laws
be enacted when the people opposed H How often
do we see constitutional provsious lie dormant and
imperative by reason Of . failure of the Legs-
Ature to make them effective by leeieIa.ion
No constitutional provision right can be effective
without the fundamentally Of legislation, and with
ont such Legislation no court enforce Q sing
Glance Why then should there any fear on this sub
ec1 The bar existence OF may be obnoxious,
and no doubt ~ 10 \ majority but should such refine
ment, such sentiment, mder the circumsta, ces
prevent them from accepting = Sac government by
which they cannot be harmed and WHICH pregnant
ritorial system. II is but due truth and Wedge
Of the feelings Of free State men, say II there was
and the Iecoptou, that they could expected TO
adopt the latter; but such option store them II Ia
other; but the question n will Il BIS accepted With the
conceded right OF change, will q Territory
In reference TO the lana grant WHICH Congress
free state press he says Of tue safes rec
lands from the United States some OF them with the
Fundamental condt,cn attached cor in ieu' OF those
asked 10 The orcnsnce ing their spp ,stou FOR
admission or on condition bat they should do or not do
certain thrg. The act Of Congress approved March g.
$780, admisson Of Florida and iowa that
the said States should be admitted on the exp,ess c,ud
ton that they shoad never interfere with Tue primary
n
the while IN the possession Of the United
states 10 coOcuaus bis letter aai speaking Of the folly
msrhs as follows
per cent upon the sales Of public lands were given We
Congress lin lien Of the nronoston snbmttea nv ny
onance parsed by the convention OF delegates at Iowa
sps. cr hs ssson sma s~e.aS M ,ne ac o. OSn
Of the public lsndp, also know that sne was
nv On .n LIS are we 20 De tod
Der admission which rejected her ordnsuce and that il
leaves the densnfs OF Congress to he con
have been admitted even she had the Usus pouusoo
but che accepted the grant and scguesced in the demands
ing her enabling sc was made To deo"nd non nm sc.sn
aDce Of the consution adopted at Madison" had
Terory for a. sss 'rg eT
liberal grants Of land and the Ave clause and
o pc sS o Ina, sne enrse me Union 20 nese
many other instances although none Of them arc literally
pSn, me LeSomPton ordinance assumes the right Of
ascent but ain euo thereof granted 1--WE Der cent II we
.hsll see proper to receive II is confederation for
brbe veil nigh, the bounty land Of ,so.s Gno S~s,
the battles Of the country be termed bribc aud be
give us oco OF acres bn, grant co COO sne rc
jecs the larger amount and says may in and re-
ceVe tne tmAuer we wiu-u not, she has no further
propoenon 70 make o. tns time. IL should be remcm
us.sa, oo ssas snsse ch.ses % otloefy ana threats
whch ~, srss,n, a1
ren,lemep saw nothing wrong In n IN their iusymsDI
was panacea for a the is OF Ksprss the only
bond 10 unite as with the federal Union.
LKAvENwoRTH Cry, X. r., July %. 1853.
tlorr, or Bs fbo,;,;on;,,, yrs,.,u :, a. o.,
- ~ ' W cue .a"P
montgomery ana ms Ne'' cfohes-hoTse Ihierss
from Laurence IN Limbo-Jhe Late Heavy
Rain,-THe Prospecf for Faymsrs-7he Crsaf
IT,, It,,n, ~ :, ~. D,,,,-,-,-u, o..
up" '"'e"'' &C
Ihe leaders oil the Tree State party are greatly
alarmed at the publication of the certificates OF
election under the Iecomnton constitution IN which
-, " WV"
reieIeu IN my "s' ie''er' ana already the organs
of the abotionists are out in flaming editorials, de-
nouncipp what they term n secrc, esort among n
,ort,or 90 Tho sroo c,o,o VA ., a, ,ho
p''so" VI '"o '''' a'"'o '"on W au .no pros'Very
party IN carrying the election on the I'd proximo.
Marcus j. Parrot intends addressing the citizens