New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-12-06

fIs. ~. se~ta S-sr.s ~; ws,1a, slof T. III
tar'etf; sns o. is eI'cucr =. r,rti,, ~ a..
sId e'tr-oe AMI 'csi'rat. Court a., "a %
10 "a - ro,!ce sven IN orchiy Asyo. g.. ss
$500 Ter. . % gou g 81 tse FrorI, ''''o
er's's ll' 20 80 csm y. property ne
"a IS aL.h ssr .; li..'at sLsU To-
TIE pr pest, I'd spd,r the .ss,--t sr, IL
r s, ~ ~ 20, ne rsy cpgoe re 20 -ai - lci q
dcne E1ipay n 80 vsys. cine ~ r'1sou % 'et aside
,5.,ere On tr.yere tie rs,,y he srpe,r,nce "a
chin 81 Ppp-i!, theu nh 70 psst er'red, aai he
ss5ae >. so,o-t c.ss- n. al, d.. ro ~. b.,
seco - ore ~sS pad ,is6si T. thee p s'ilG
40. 70 t;ial IN lie ordasry ssy beo'r tiry ri
l9i 90 ll'st Po'es ia made ~ sao rie t'r rdsneni
srrgs -r oferrrr osue-t se.1o,a tered q, when rs
verdi. 8, favor Of tas t~r the i'ef Aresdy N
eeH:ie1 .s Is ., ssa; "a to axe ise ae c, s,if
70 -. - ~ "a "a oS.i i' ~, - -, -
rasas 2: I.ed liza. llel
This sfefIscal Of the krsss practice si2heP ua'rrsy
iir,,rs- this III prcceedrgs E-yri f-r
Icy ha' ak,I Pate Aie oy p,sai.J L t-.t ch,'. ter
500, e6il - risr r ,uist euy rae niy ansuoUn
. uud,i p.e~ss ,.tei % ~ he VIII Of extent Z
s o,oxa u7oa IKE +; ,has souid sy these FcemIasy
po' ?, roa Re rR.5 se 'iPs eoI',s r., deo' sS
Sb. rhsrt. net. But b, 80. should have .,ns'
eHetter tie hsrsc'er q r claim would te aechj 'rJ
Tesmo Fno.se q 20 or,it AZ arsest aoaa LEX ,e
N
won cfsl, s1pe ontisc, deb, The dbt Of rcpd
Nnrh the result Of tie pr IN nary po,,eos' Ih-re
by tie mutual consent q be pstes az the ctsl;cr ~
iela9 raii cUst equity r epri'i.s ae pa'r;f % ai,
h s-eater ceraiy precision and PeTsi'acy u tie
'' S 1o, ,q- @ vi e. "a. 70 S, 80 Of 51 a,o pa.
h,st L. the d.'t Procerdes Lee ~ouit De
l II 4c 5S. i, s &c wea Sc obsd to
uou the dett, aai you'd Dclcr be yeed Dor a
sed 20 q tsck the orgrs u acon takna -
4. n ! q
c,ae,..yo Of sticn puie proceedng Hi
= defendant, Lad never tasu place sn's -
raI 'sc'on urcn which teht Of aeon asnr.' ar 'he.
b. founded, unes. be- has 10 way 1cconr pal'y
-u.os IN 'ole esa poers o. 40 p'sel naa
been obtained. Even therefore, the acton hAf been pose
eas.d England uIder sl'e similar 20 our. llauN 'ne
psnt I'D nct rely ~ lrcoF r., upon wal 80 Atto
~ called "a 'h. cas- he extent aad i14a'Sn 10 me IAe
plo. VII IL arte I'D i4De - lIf.-i.
toDsl objection. He would be driven Therefore, % lis ors
IL an, wsy aiaugos-snd tie plaintiff The oninsy
st to recover la h. complaint :, very apparent
aspoa waich be ~oud have .5 r.h De had .ueug
upon ID. ogus ot act on alone But Ee ' ouh a.'o
subssniye u seton. bu, c, ia the history OF mo
caue OF se,ioD gyts x uo, precision and c-lsny 70 6s
other hand eetnd,u, e,im, that pas Ith as tao
subtants. Of acon-le record on ~h'h tle
uh relies q recovery, and the other ale
ouy by wsy of .roonoton ot lnduceueat b., Is GEAR -
ny mind tia. it Is not record the oTdnt, 'e'e Of tl
tfr-ls L. conclusive Up The prtis .p,be Of
contradiction SID importing Aso!ut- vcfty ~ seneted
that it .,ner,d Of record. But Ia, not she oT
wholly eyp'te proceeding and woai have more Inherent
force than judgment ceoce record made up on e Pafy
owu mo,a, wtlo.t notice to the adese parry ia ease
where the practice Of the Couis red The IA IA te com
slt to be verified by dntee witness think slcha
rccercg iudspepi,,o - tuts gys q Efficacy eau have
such BY the principle. Of The common law a, sab
such ha,ing nhereo dry, independent Of 10" ali
upror de .iyes om the original cause Of 'tor u
NOTHING of action sad thsy are iueh,ca. iof
that purpose, h,y o H. al Deprive tie f'ai OF
he
q ton IN Other vord. the plaintiff ha' MT,
he originally ael pied 70 Do So s. gesdid n $.
give character make IL s.ew tnfS Tao
prseut action Ia M al action q recover me ey OF oPesy
cb,zz dnieny gisappied BY public oih'ef OF Tor
Tbs result at which have arrived upon hi, part Il The case
conrary an ee ssy, to original imsFv,,oa makes It
the ria niia he'd .aceecdei a tfau,fuas b, rs, can
n,o Judgment he wou thereby have forfeited tn rsht %
tI uI2I T. Il 'u5S. .t,c - ~, ,r~ns osr ia
S &c at Duns sIf s sic st .a,.. s
Of It's pfo,o,,oni whjs Justice We dua Of TO si2sIo
cae coils ioi = decision 81 that question.
en- Therefore Of Cpul0n that the defendant Il not entitled
to be c ,nssd upon srcunt argued before
the AM tht The oac Of The Special Term 'aoa be
Befors iisNItTos W RosNsoy, Rsf.rce.-D,e. p 1888.
IsrFRLsTIsG DEclsIoN-EGnrs Of EErIRiHG PAHr-
NERs.
George p Ferris ct al ast w. Il stowe.
The parties To this action We're cop4rtners from the
't septeu ber 1856 70 about Feb ie3 Wheg u,- Pa'aer
ois.os.d b. deihdsuts wdfssi1g iro tue ufn
sns snsrrriaa Ii. n,e.s, 20 Geoge terd, u tue
P'r' the ssre, ett tor 40 es eetsd ~ ~ the
lie sold his interest va the firm 70 the ntf deb
h. certain Of tie Inn aud, also, d ndil'
AID indemnify defer da against the liabilities Ct the
hm.
fm and ef tie pesios yea business va, nas up, non
which y eppeaIed that After dccutng tie amount OF IN" is
p,ud,i db and aots' there remained eat mated
profit which divided aud tie accounts OF the several part
nets creoied v.,h their respective proPolilon'. ..
dine u the yeas $50 toe tsn had received y hkni II
butsr sod pro6t. aut the entered aljns
Iceps the arm The butter into the
a been 10 va.ded by "a agent Of the ~
onsed 20 nra parry "lo stst me distortion .! ths n
sIs Of ill., account book Il the OK ~ in Tho receo.
Loi sud book, and IN conse 81 that omission 4,
1t $ eaSf ~ without 9ivas ia a. ben earned The
cn q th ,un IN which pcyog, the i,oution Of tho h
b sed % ten. IN ' b @ saf .t s
he .eielee found me ioo~il s'nseIs Of .Aw:
,e' By the article, Of dtsoaon ex.egted s, s, ana
aud % ,.,ump,c BY Georfs B. Ferris Of IT, Aab
sul ion and ti' obi t n io continuation towai 'A':
e es Of the dsfencar TIE joint eton was severed ana
TIE duties 10 ai,n Iae eie ~ "a, va = ,s.'
iesop wio with SUMPTION Of te liabilities oi N defend
!,fseiion The defender, thus eessd rom bis ron
partner ard far is eoPaners we're concerned from al
irfs,,.ti, me Gy1s. (s.OTy Psrt I'D. 10. 1877
SeoaG. the l4ntf, did release The defendant
9aton Contribute toward The hsblAe. u the
Sim tlsy matt aiming this act "a agan
Ln In item Of isbr.en.a waieh t-~y
my lave been ccm mate Of TIE plras
th .. (s,orJ II Psrt, ?. 20, o. 12t)
The n profits rafe % the st 81 s"pteu'7
l6 T. tina OF mere ASSUMED est
nate TIE affairs Of lie firm predicted upoG con. n- on
yele Of many II The as.es AID ehps's.y es.aeaLs
st.u.-ted cLs" W ii. ititl.-d fund IL tlc paJ
lrept ri rsiL d ls5''s NJ balance '.ract 20
sssnsr TIE ene att sna TIE boz Of tie ,cceae's so" M
BE sccoun. .. era slosd balanced when ne ei l. nor
j. this lcou trouflt % rscoyer any slch balance.
Tiyt: Aua .Ls-iaeL. lot have the en- - 20 -