The Washington union. [volume] (City of Washington [D.C.]) 1857-1859, 1858-04-09

clancy Jones' Jones' Keii Kelly Jacob NJ Ksnlc
samuel Marshall Maynard Niles Miller ,iIson Montgomery
Moore So .As rsass'o Phelps Philips lowell ea.man n
"ss.9a sos sn.h '."sSs A. smith stephens aes
Ninsnw woodson wot'e"dyke, Augustus Wright John Wright
NAYS Mcsss Abbott Andrews aiInghur-t bingham, Blair
Bliss, Branch, ra,u, saann Burng Barnsit Burroughs
cneman Cobb cochrane coas oomins cragiu
Burton csse, Curry cnf' iamre John g DAVIS Timothy Davn
II Massachusetts, Dawes
pieq, Ee Elliott, English, rarnswortn fcnon Poster carnr
Harlan, Harris Iiaskn Hin, Hoard Horton Houston
Geo Jones' kellogg, Kelsey, xrers, Kna, John Kuntc
morrill, Edward Joy norr,s Isaac Morris Freeman
rc,op idKc Potter rae rvIanec Ready Reagan Richie Rs
bins Roberts Royce Hnnn scaIes Aaron Shaw Henry shaw
s,awor stanton, William stewart Talbot Tappan Taylor
vs %sn rSs . WADE
Israel washburn, Wilson, and wood--l2a
So the bill was rejected.
ADMISSION MINNESOTA.
message received from the Senate informing the
House that that body had passed bill for the admission
thereto.
THIS ADMISSION KANSAS
Mr. MONTGOMERY, of Pennsy lvania asked unani-
nous consent Of the House to take from the Speakers
table the Kansas BILL the Senate having disagreed to the
amendment Of the House.
There being no objection the bill was taken up,
Mr. MONTGOMERY moved that the House adhere to
its amendment
that motion would he to cut of all hope of settlement
Mr. MONTGOMERY demanded the previous question.
Mr. SEWARD, of Georgia. moved that the House
Mr. ENGLISH, Of Indiana, appealed to Mr. MosrooM
ERY to permit him to make proposition.
Mr. MONTGOMERY declined to yield
Mr. CIINGMAN, OF North Carolina, hoped the motion
would he voted down.
Mr. SEWARD inquired whether the Speaker had de-
cidcd that when the previous question demanded
upon distinct motion. the motion to reccde not in
order.
The SPEAKER stated that he had SO ruled
The question recurring upon the previous question:
Mr. WAsliBURNE, of Illinois, demanded tellcrs
which ordered.
The vote being taken, resulted ayes lls, noes not
counted. So the previous question was sustained.
The question recurring ON the main question,
Mr.. CIINGMAN, of North Carolina, demanded the
yeas and nays
Mr.. STEPHENS, of Georgia, stated that the agreement
yesterday was that the vote should be taken at this time
and lie hoped 1t would he carried out
Mr. CIINGMAN Withdrew the demand
Mr.. CLEMENS of Virginia renewed IL; but the y, as
and nays not ordered, only five members voting in
favor thereof
The question recurring tho motion to adhere,
Mr. BOCOCK, Of Virginia, demanded the yeas and nays
which were ordered
Pending the call Of the roll,
Mr.. BOWIE, of Maryland, stated that he had paired
off with Mr.. MARSHALL, of Kentucky and Mr. MAR
SHALL stated that If he had not paired off, he would
The having been taken, resuted-yeas ll9, nays
Ill, follows
YEAS Mcssrs Abbott, Adruin Andrews Bennett Blnehurs,
nnshs% Blair ,lss Esayon '.son na'oganc hrroushs
York, Cawson Clark D. Cchrale Of New York. Cterl Coax
dawn" indiana Davis s as sa Davis Of Iowa. ~
Dean Dick ndd Drfce Ellie English rarnsworh Fcnton Foley
beck CROW Hall Ohio, Han o. Massachusetts Harlan
I 5 hr e s Rsa knaS w
Kukc Of pennsylvania Leach Letter
Pennsyvana Morris Of Illinois Morse Maine Morse Of New
Ms .s i sS o Rnd ,sSs sssss ns
cr Royce, Shaw Illinois, sherman Ohio,
Thayer thompson Tompsins Underwood was waSasc, Wal
dron walton wAshpurne Wisconsin wahDurnc Of Illinois Wash
NAYs-Messrs. Ali anderson Arnold Atkins Avery,
burns cass sss j. Missouri Gay caasn, c ss ' roSS
John cGs ro. Of New r0s Care, Corning Gs & % Of
Dewar mmmick powdeIl, F.'aunlso" Elliott Eas, Faulkner
Hawkins Ill., Hopkins Houston Hughes HuyIer Jackson
,eve, Jones Of Tenn Jones Of Penn keia Kelly Kansc
Maynard Miles Miller nilsson Moore Nback ieyon Phelps Ih
sc ss snse q eas sas sewn m y ss n
ona, shorter sickles Singleton Smith Of Tennrce smith vir
bot, Taylor Of New York Taylor Of Louisiana Tpc Ward War
Wright Of Georgia. Wright Of Tennessee, and zoccacr
SO the House agreed to adhere to its amendment,
THE DEFICIENCY BILL AGAIN.
Mr. BRANCH of North Carolina, moved to reconsider
the vote by which the deficiency bill rejected. He
gave notice that if the motion should prevail he would
offer resolution for its recommitment to the Committee
of Ways and Means with instructions to report in lieu of
the bill six different bills, for specific purposes 1t
obvious that the bill rejected in consequence of there
being items in it TINT caused gentlemen to vote against ii
who in favor Of the main items in the BILL The
resolution Of Mr. GARNET not satisfactory because of
the difficulty in executing it. The resolution which he
proposed avoided that difficulty by not going much
into detail and requiring the committee to report in each
bill the items belonging tocach bill Hedd believe that
any member would vote against bill to supply efcen
cies in the army in view of t fact that unless these