New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-04-29

-e.y tte MOnsVe WORE, among "No" " "'''
..os.ter Ire third passenger car was toro*o 100 IL
,h track srd went bounding aOIg over tue uss az no
- ,,sa,ire rate at least report the occupan'''
- 81. a broncN y 10 a stand stil without any very
-. ,esuts 20 tr- passengers, and by az ingenious
-. ~ ,b. conductors was soon on The track For
,o,,,a,oo Of Railroad men we will mention the
- ,sad n successfully this occasion. wool
,,a., nj hand aod false track was made OF
ia n,,n,ner ctpe with sn al sticks aud increasing
I, ard laid ia a direction so that when the train
h.,k.d the car rsn up this inclined plane AMI the
80. see on the track az they reached the end OF
A.. t.I.s track made Of the wood. Cow No. l was
(.nrd distributed along the tack for some % feet
80 in ore place, he.it in another and so on Cow
No WAS found with broken back and o kind pas
se,ser coon yu, end to her misery by blow with
.nsx. Cos No mounted 90 the front OF the
engine lying eean't the G. Dder heads and inside OF
tito framework Of the engine, aui seemed more
frgb,eted tean bur and lft to take her chances
OF q recovery. We are tf,rmed By passenger that
the employees deserve great prsse f"r tne Goodness
and prumpto, =. ia the en- rgency, with, perhaps the
execution Of the eDgioeer who might have whistec TO
"brske up" and thus relieved sooner the alarm OF
TIE psssepgers lie ssd however, that the bel-rope
wss fastened in tue csr and the fact OF the
csr being of ire track was not thus msde known to
him. But who was TO blame for that? The quarter
OF minute delay might on some parts Of the road
have proved fatal to the passengers in that car.
THE MURDYR OF YOUNG McCARTY.-The nvestiga-
ton commenced on Toes1sy By Coroner Connery in
relation TO The death Of John McCs'ty, who was sho
iu the dance house No. 10 North William street on the
night of the 3dinst by pistol in the hands Of Leroy
Roscius, ss previously reported in THE TRIBUNE, wa
Yesterday resumed and concluded The testimony
went 10 show that the deceas.d and ROscus were total
strangers and that the prisoner had not the lea'
p,ovocson for so deliberately shooting down McCarty
Among all the witr examined there was not one
who could say word for Roscius in extenuson OF his
conduc. in thur coOly taking the life of an innocent
Young man who bad never harmed him or attempted
IN do 20 in any manner. The evidence beiog con-
Guided Coroner Copnery briefly addressed the Jury to
whom he reviewed the most important portions OF the
evidence after which the was submitted for their
consideration The following verdict WAS soon rem
dered by the jury:
That John NeCsy the deceased came 70 h death by Pi
ebot wound NJ the right the hands Of The prisoner Leroy
RosuS the n OF the Sd of April 1883 without the ies'
provocsticu"
After the verdict returned the prisoner preferred
to have his formal examination posipon I'D TIL he could
have time to consult with his counsel He was accord
ipeIy remapded to the Tombs. Roscus is tsn,
There is nothing in bis features to denote that mslg-
psnt S.spos,icn wi ch he evinced in killing the de-
ceased He was born il this city bai hiS parents re-
eide at Morrisanis, Weschsstsr County. The fesrful
position in which he placed is mainly attributable to
the vicious company he has allowed himself to keep
when away from his parents and hey ond their control
A MKAE ScAMP.-At the special term OF the Su-
preme Court held at Dalston recently was tried the
div orce suit Of Licus T.. Buckley vs.. Mary H. Bulk
lev. The motion was to set aside a judgment of d.
yorce before granted on the ground Of irregular and
fraudulent service of the sumWOns by which the &C.
ton was CONNIE, ced and the judgment 1tsned. The
plaintiff s an sussney aud resides in New.YoTk City;
was married TO defendant May Il, 1882 aud from that
time TO October G. 1856 lived together. They had one
child, four years old. On the 9th of October 1876,
defendant took passage on California steamer, TO
visit her motner at Sacramento was accompanied to
the tssne by her husband, who spent the last hour
befre ts departure in apparently fteniy and afec-
tionate copven alton with her. IL that conversation
the plaintiff expressed his qualification that good OPP
opportunity had offered for her to visit her moth
er When the order wSs given on board for all
persons not bound to California, to 90 ashore
ope Of the witnesses saw the plaintiff, at the ma
ment Of bidding farewell, embrace and kiss his wife,
and then hand her package. Tais package was a
email tin box. closed, covered with paper, aud tho
psper sealed At the time of banding this package to
the defendant the plaintiff informed her that the box
contained present for her mother, aud also note Tor
herself he requested her 10 be careful Of the present.
and to deliver il safely TO her mother. After the de-
fepdsnt hsd pass-d Sandy Hook, and WAS out at sea-
her curiosity induced her unsea aud open the pack
age which be husband had 80 delivered to her. Upon
opening the box she discovered therein a summons
directed TO herself defendant and 10 which her SAID
busbsnd the plaintiff, filled out in the handwriting
of her husband aud signed by himself his own AZ
torbey oonta.Ug tue usual notice TO her that an action
was thereby commenced 10 the Supreme Court; that
the complaint would be filed in the Clerks office
in Saratoga COuafy aud that If she failed to put N
answer in twenty days the plaintiff would apply to the
Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. The
said box contained letter to her, informing her
that the sccn obtain divorce, and that he the
plaintiff had witnesses by whom he could provo tho
ieoassAy facts The said box conaiaed no present to
ler mother nor any other thing but the said
end letter Toe portion of defendant statement
was not denied. Ii was denied by paiutd that he
kissed his wife at parting, ami 1t was said she
received the ealed box from Bulky coik, wac was
presert. snd not from Dukley himself Arriving a.
Asp,nwal the first apdng of the vesse she made an
effort TO rvun but such was her condition in body and
lnud that her friends demonstrated against 1t. she
could find no vessel which would return her to New
York in twenty days. nor had she pecuniary means to
secure passage She held through tickets to Cali
fo,nia She kept ou her journey resided 10 California
a short time, ana returned to New York about the
nidde of January 1857, and did not see her husband
Until after the decree OF divorce was granted. Sac
made attempts TO her child but not permitted