New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-01-23
LAW NTELLIGENCE.


sCPREME COCRT-sTLcfsL TESN.-j1n 2A-be'''' '9
SUIrEkLsNO. 20 p,o.
~ THE MATER or NE BABEA' coHPCS ~
DUCE ENNt A. TAYLOR. -. o.. al
This On 40 came on al II o'clock, acsp.ui7 b..
pmeut Mary fansa gc f ido' gS %hetsr The roI
sisiused that pondent eNefci. J ind or
the young ladyLnyhius noe ri.es over daughter
restraint which mother murray ,;l1 lie would alince
NJ, Scars declined 70 Tbs what rss med
has esidcDce and counsel M GIT J''se 'O-
W. T..o then tedfed-I am acquainted win mtI
Nrsr her dsgsh'e sl a. sen months. vi The eP9q Of
The months. returned again TO her serVe Oh H. j saw Mr.
S In ~ ard I'd Der daushter about u os noon '' e n
m her house on The I'm Sh ' beor they The
hard VII ask her dessat 70 sss her, M. Wright an
EmIns Asked where she wished 10 ''Ae III '''
O What llrs Whsbts msnnet ~, b ~. ,.re.
~ yer Of the mother authoritative aud not in the
@ Syce an authority which the daughter in the absence Of
n.i.d in support OF the objection cbsrs"r1od ibis ~
Sed on The ground the moers manner one 81
authority restraint not legal imprisonment 'hs'
The question was then modified and admitted; and witness
sn.ees Nc os p vas up stairs in the hall Mrs Wright
and her daughter in the bedroom below thy aa @
turn during day Mrs Wright did not speak TO her daughter
Croscxsmnaton- sln staying with Mr.. johnson; was
came here this morning STAGE Mr. Aired sheSoEe came
with Mr. Yrd .ubp9sed me he p Went o cry sther be-
sac s,is tG Il "s'' anu 4',
Are Are you You maden lady then Yes Sir should hope
20 ASIDE left Ms whshts iI good about ~ p . S"'e
MI Bus.eed-Dd you think was angry wh,n 's 'peSkuS
to The Judge this morning A. Yes Sir thought you were
@ You though, going to beat the Judge, 'idnt you
O Ms Wright was bali mad when he spoke to Emma
a. wa: va. she A. No: Sir .,,. v,e, v,, bo.-5 Ne,
Wright and her daughter talking together A. was looking for
O. Did you find H. Mary, A. dill, Sir. On Saturday night
the night Of the marrsge let the party in wien 9ey
Hsw.y brother he all sunday and there on
Monday; he slept alone both nights; Miss Hawley usually slept
with friend fbcr aud slept with her on Saturday and sunday
Mr. Buseed-A lady iend' A. Yes, Sir. Mrs Wright used
sometimes speak angry all Miss Emma the Te,
day when heard the conversation have related Ms
ssesosos paid the sag fair . morning wa, an act p
be , oS ebdsg Js ~ bore Mr. Whit and hey dager
he vent get conveys1ee to sse his trunk away NJ. Wr f
before told him to eaye about seven months pTeou' to
this. she had got him out Of the h9u.s once SeTe always ,
Ion; Nj Yard took tea at Mrs Wrghs on the night
ma Ne %as ine when Mrs. Wight tod Mr. TaoT 10 cave
The house, be said nothing but seemed to feel badly neither
Mrs. Wright told the latter to leave the house.
Some letters from the respondent 10 the reaor written in 1886
offered in evidence intended TO s2 by them
that MIR Wright a. first eneouroged the marriage They would
been entered into to this marriage; that fraud
they would show that Mrs Wright herself was the arch conPr
in bringing about the marriage.
Mr. Buseed objected the introduced Of letters Though
mind if found that Mr. Taylor unworthy to be her
in.law.
letters then withdrawn for the present and Mr. Frank
Hswley called 70 the stand to prove the the letter.
sao in her handwriting.
The letters again offered and objected TO- The Court
ruled them The letters might tend 10 show that Mr. Taylor
dshonorsby paying his addresses to Miss llawy
having been with Mrs. Wghts but that
would have bearing the question before the Court
relato then rested his aud Mr. Busted moved to dis
miss the writ. ~.
The Court refused do II appeared in evidence that
marriage in fact place The husband in law entitled
20 have the person Of his wife The wife was last seen IN M Gus
tody respondent and the latter ought to account Tor
Mr. Busted hoped he should be able on 10 chSuse
<rbe mind of the Court.
The case adjourned 10 Monday al II M
DECISIONS.
Lewis o. Wilson, &C., agt. Peter A. Brtton.-Order
City Savings Bank agt. Oliver agt. Bidwell &C.
Motion denied
SUPERIOR COURI-sPEcI.L TERM-Jsn 22-Betore Judge
SLossON.
DECISIONS.
Openheym agt Mathematician TO strike 0utparts
OF irrelevant denied, with 20 costs Inc PioP'
mode Of raising the objection Is BY demurrer .u 90,
Harriet agt. NcCunn, &c.-MouOh 10 sl'lNe T Tue
counter claim and Judgment denied, with ~ costs Inc
MAJ yers set up constitute good counter claim:
Cassard agt. Hinman.-lnt errogatones O1lecteu 10
10 be stricken ont unless the defendants counsel Will so ody
them as TO limit inquiries and the call for papers & 70 o
matters strictly controversy in this action such no0eu ~
1erogatories 10 be settled by the judge. NJ,
Ehen agt Rutgers Fre-Insurance COmpany'-Mo-
sin % mi se on Special Term calendar denied without costs
Rowne act Bowne-Motion for alimOny peHfeHtc
Ar. and fr am advance dey OF SUIT ana
Srenstody of children denied but without costs If desired
reference Will ordered 10 settle and arrange plan upon WHICH
,,;sits IA the children TO b. conducted.
Before Judge BoswoRTI
Evans agt. ulins.-Case settled.