The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-06-29

Appraiser uPos sgyes. from ,as decn,. Of the local
sess sos to Ds osrssvsa by psye as, sSs
sns~rs Is %sae ,sa, he repsd tbs OBJ incl,
lrau-rctd by mus. ss.nms that charge
Ssns hi. oo"ss ~ a.. Ia. between
he s Of ms rsss a.s msres,u -ao,s
sasissd h ssere.y q he Iress, q ss isc: and the
&c her nAemiss lie have no HESITATION that your
.sSn -ss,ish. end anc int the Secretary Of
vel established case tbs ee.r ip,.an psss
+ The p,oa ~ may we Be-
cens s'sd misfortune out however
1red oula suSsst sorsrsmsSt least Ss hsssrs
Of Sies,as 10 90 her Ssslnss -h nercSses
incumbent 's s c ss ooe
Ias of he facts such resignation was no, arof,red
Quo, saa 1S"sesr s &c ,sa hsd
sppe,rs have aud thai shoad unto.
,nnss hsye re i.c.sd upon your osisl cen.
Isuprose 10 be political sfecd.
10 rel oa any q he parties conssrnsd in this @aer
xneIng sny degree 70 ihaa-nce my jrdemeD .od h,t
Secretary OF the Treasury would oduce hesitate 70
esd enc 0''' ''AA Hosx ACE TT JG lGIssa
These letters show enthusiastically that Mr. Dlaye pre-.
tended TO submit al tue charges. while in fact he kept
back OF the strongest, and by reading the chag
from Eyb opens prepared by himself, he deceived them
isto belief thai he had furnished evidence enough 70
dsprcye eli the charges contained In toe report four
OF the signing members etst5 dstinctly thai ne
perceive some (chgcsD that have recollection Of
having tSen heard either alleged or refuted 1t vial be
remembered that Dlaye had copy Of my report OF the
18th November lst the other Of the 18th February,
1885, wss not furnished " him. because the secretary OF
the Treasury did moi cocsiocr that be had wered
tsry properly osps the ers Two ofthe members
hatch and Cark-deolare they never saw or read the
chArgee sDsi MI Dpaye nor did they ever read the
certificate having added toer names 70 the hist al the
instance OF colleague wthou, knowing that the letter
any 5;rg more taaI ordinary recommendation To
retain man IN tice; and IS believed that they had
read the paper they would not have signed It,
Fourth Offering give him (ilaye official certificate
a he had iuy aprvea every Charge on coade that he
simple proposition ard would place Mr secretary Cobb
IN very uoenvable posoa stated truly; but uufor
position IONS W Maclsy and John Kelly -whose
VOLUNTARY letter 10 Secretary COBB after reading Oaye
charge teken by from the files OF the depart
msrt, VIII De found beo~;-
WASHINGTON CRY, n C Juac Is 1858.
30, .owmd Conn on =. seSs.sry 81 .se
lester 81 stephen A. Ds,e ESQ which appeared ia the
passage oeeus the te Of Mr. Uoso
oGsrrd III Gp S resign 70 ada Your ooa Ger
zoe sane une SAYING sos S,a no, resign you wsuii
justice 20 sesre 20 that In he month Of
s Eq w we s Wis sr 70 IA .. aoS
to BIZ esse a. se sss wiiDs 70 resign hs cce e General
oassl ie.ter exoner.ng him charges preferred
% sgs 10 ys IL.
s oatses hsd oisproved thai you coud
sPe'''ul your Ooedien' servants, y MS 2 TaGLSY,
Fron tbs letter appears that the only differences be-
tween M hayes assertion end the truth OF the is
ths-Mr Dlsye says that Secretary Cobb made the offer
him. he rejected H. whereas the proof shows that
Mr. y llaJe MADE the Offer TO Mr. cobb ana Mr. Cobb
sprrntd u An honest ana truthful man could never
hsse ms5e such mistake, but II was very natural
After his reckessness and peryersions
Of truth, there be vestge OF confidence placed in
desce gooa OF who disposed TO sus
tsir linn rs long they believed him right, but b. bis
r1ssuupton ald folly has them that their
confidence was misplaced.
Finh Abandoning him (Dniaye suddenly from a most
eieier; sad valuable uehs ofcsr 70 susPeced and
character man VI honor had been ieslionsd
This certainly ser adulaory enough, and sufficiently
denuncaicg OF Secretary bb TO srady the vanity Of
even SIR. Rla:e; bat unfortunately for him, the letter
above quoled OF the Hoo George Taylor proves sstslac
ieriy bad long Suspected and long accused
OF want o, integrity ana fsilhiulness pubic of
Hsvre disposed Ct Mr. Dlisyes charges relstsg solely
10 the actions OF the Secretary OF toe rre1ury,
they are swcfptbe OF any eyiccpce, INV proceed to
consider such Of his assertions as relate - my o;
acts cont ec,ed WITH the investigation or Mr. Hayes
tDquenoes IN uce under instructions Of tho secretary
OF Tie Treasury.
Gulsrie tssirg evidence agaos, ice. tnon asked
him such Was the fact, ami he declared that not"
Conscience sometimes operates po~erfuy mso's
rnrcs aot 20 that s,iep, cause may Nc Dusyesa;
cdectul niormer be trncdy II Is hardly possible that
Information. 4
had barely commenced examining the records with refe
70 70 the charges, and bad not AT tas time Mr.
lAye maze his irq Iry uttered one word that cou dis
Close my object 10 any person except 10 the Secrea
" the Treasury ami 70 70 the Hon. MI raylor,
who had called the after nv arrival In New
YORK, oEcioseo himself tue author Of the charges
TO the secretary OF the rreasury-A TACT
e1iires a kno yu 70 me before.
Mr. nnsa,vs mory mus, lie very unfaah!rl, or be
wouo have torgozen thai IN the inisrvie~
above referred 70 be said 70 that be understood that
tne Secretary OF the Trea'u-y had preferred chxrges
n M ha <frgfA lha
The fost Ani olhers, whose names do not recolect
now were At the bosiom Of Il all He would also
Der tns told him misrAk points that
hsd nAcs.-Rrs rhe secrets'y OF tue Treasury never
preferred charges against ssuS'rdnstes but charges
OF ofcia, misconduct made TO him Against any or
bus svbordus;ss he drectod inquiry into the facts
and they proved 10 be well founded the officer gene
rally fell second In relation 10 the persons namod,
knew he eDtrey mistaken ths, they had nothing 90
90 sitb the matter ana knew nothing about H. ! then
told that charges had been made to the Secretary OF
the Treasury sesbst tome o. bs oicisl acts that Dad
been directed examine into them, x1d tha would do
and the result ~ such animation TO the Secre
tsry OF he Isasury These are enthusiastically words
tbs, passed bet Aud Mr. Dlay knows Il 10 De
noswhhsian ding his assertion 70 the contrary.
Second lie ssJs, about Two mouths Subsequent 70
tbs ruuor reached ne tAi charges had besn preferred
agn7si me
How 20 ttese ssser,ous tall, With the information given
10 bin by rayse tne inierve- referred tor Wa he
1os clearly d.sincty iaorme1 By me- II nay oicAl
capacity hsi cbs-ges hal been maze against his ems.
CONDUCT, Aad ths, had bseu directed 20 inquire into
them2 Certainly he understood the importance OF toe
States would have dore.
Thsro Nj DIiaye admits thai q copy OF the charges
we're pisced IN hs hsn1s, anu ssyE-' Nov, SIR, waat
we're those charger Where Old the mputstiIrs they
couvoyed hSd thsr origin aud who spr;ei TIE aio a.
80 Ano thf he on N npoa1t, ,iirg
rsnntr 20 answer the hrtt OF BIS own inquiries TINS
way Tao Of the main charges bad at ny oTn request
been tpsciay invest found 10 be utterly gfcu0f
lfs. than Elk Dutbs beiofc Secretary Ooob came
isto Cince' 80 thai seems there were suspicious
sgsrst Mr. naye before he stricken down o. Secfe
tsrv COBB anc souehocy else besi-ts Meesrs Sckes,
Hart aEd ylor had been accusing him, long time ago,
Of official misccoduct. What pity tnst anv man
should be twice Inspected for the offence Neither
the "tvO main charges the other tour which he
reiers being specified 10 SUCH way 10 identity them
9Th M, feSorl sbs pass that portion Of his
nun,csioB. u being my intention 70 give brief state
q 81 the charges proved against his ofcs conduct
u soton everybody who may think proper 10
txauire them.
STATEMENT or 1HE CHARGES AGAINST STEPHEN D.
DILLAYE, coNTAIEsD IN NY REPORT.