New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-06-17

ISON LOT. BENNET TT.
SpHOR OF THE HERALD VERSUS The
p1rpIJ sNER OF THE HERALD.

PUBLISHER OF THE HERALD
tvup PLAINTIFF POILED EY TECHNICALLY
The case Of David wemyss Jobsen sSa'nf' N.'s
C.,dss Bennett, uIder the proceedhse i"'"'D
~ the Sixth District Court, vas set Gown ~, -
s,eh Oh yesterday mornDg, before 'as''''
Ak sosrt, No. 80! Broadway. ,..-.ri. T.,
TIE action in this case brought oy tue P'"'"'"
ssrviees rendered defer dsnt IN the prep.rsNon Vi
=. 49, ~ sS;,o,;sl articles published IN The heF'
~ u-ros 81 which deferdsn. is proprietor, the |
.;.,g uoh.orl being one Of the editorial stsh OF the
80 ~ Yo,k Herald Owing 20 disagreement be- !
- NJ, Editor Jobson snd Mr.. Pubrsber Bennett
A.. .d,.Y;.l relationship sustained by Mr.. Jobson
4, Tie Herald was suddenly severed and as Mr. Job
40, contends, without sufficient cause. Bot II sn'h
rst scandal in the history of journalism could be IN
creased by the fact tia. the proprietor OF jour
~,lhke The Herald with .n Influence AMI circulation
ssly exceeded by its consistency, should refuse to pay
H. Jobson for the results of his time, talents an
s,usy. which had been so lsvishly bestowed upon'
selun1s Of that journal. The balance due vac
tr;n,e when Mr. Jobsons achievements in the ' I'd of
.n,hsTship and his transatlantic experience and mag
.6oe.t ere Cake into ooDtideraton; bat as
there seemed to be other alternative, MI. JOoson
uxmeneed suit in the one-horse concern xnowo as
the hsrre Court " the City Of New-York, which quit
Was dismissed owiOc TO legal technical .y, and the
ssuse Of Justice wss thus for the TINE BEN < tqueched
Fortunately however Mr.. Jobson ID. Nemyss job
,s,l vss equal 10 the exgenoy. Bya fort oRte s,ci-
dent s item sf service rendered 20 ~ Herald ne
.,per was Omitted IN the bill Of psr ,alars OF the suit
m the Name Count and Editorial INF egrty imper son
a,sd By Mr.. David Wemyss JObU,, grsspsd e. this
fytpitous strsw 10 viLOicste itself suis com
esets ID tsyo.hoTse District CouIt, before Justice
Fonda and sho trsl es has beeD already announced,
vas set down Cor yesterday, at > O'Clock.
stis Hbelous ma kim that ID law has been framed
rot 10 serve tut to defeat the ends OF JUSTICE and per
hare tbis hsf never been fully exempied than in
the sae Of oobsoD (uesning ID. Wepyss Jobson, ed
TOR Of The Herald against Bennett hight James
Gopdsn Publisher OF esid Her0ld) MIR Jooson states
thai his EIsel bad sssat ce that Mr.. GAbraith, the
%lequsI 900 H6srnian advocate for Mr.. Publisher
BsInett would spply for posponemeut Of the trial,
xna view perhaps, 70 an ultimate settlement, bet re-
ke.hipg his recollection of the classics by reference
v the tsyipg Of Knsas-T ip,eO D0no0s et 6oaa
f-reates Mr.. Editor JObsOn cautioned his COUNSEL to
place reliance upon the statements OF his proes-
ssrs brother and opponent, and the sequel showed
nat nr. ESitOr JbsOns mutations were right.
At 81 O'Clock, Mr.. Editor Jobson proceeded to the
Court reoEo, and learned from the Justice that Mr..
<isbraith at the Court 81 the precise hour, and
a. neither Mr. Jobson nor his too confding counsel
were present Mr.. Gsbraith, in behalf of Er. Pub.
hAer Bennett, moved thst the Court be dis
missed, and there being 70 person to op-
pose the motion the Justice had alternative but
to grant it. Singular it may seem to tho9e who axe
familiar with Mr. Gabraith's powers TO give the Sim
PES, motion the interest Of by hs eraces Of
ssssoJy and rhetoric it is ssd ba. this occasion he
vas absrIdly brief and it believed that this brevity
sb)y to be accounted for by fear his part that
Nr JsbsOn ss the editor Of The Heald hs counsel
vsuld aInve, and thus opportunity be lost for a
temporary advantage to be gained by The small tsch'
realty. But Mr. EDITOR JObson was not to be thus
ysa Ssvn He OF obce Reconstructed the cult, end will
- tSiei at a. early cay.