New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1858-01-18
LAW INIELLIGENUE.
SUPREME COURT-SPEcIaI TrRM.-Jan l6.-BeOre Judge


SUPREME COURT-SPECIAL TtRM-Jan Io--belore J-use
SUTHERLAND
THE LATE ELOPENENr.
In the Of the habea' corpus bring the body of F'nue
4. Taylor
In Saturdays TRIBUNE an account was given OF the
marriage OF the parties in this cuSe, and the alleged
detention Of the wife from her husband by Mrs
Wright, her mother. The proceedings on the habcas
corpus SO far as they had taken place, We're also
given.
On Saturday afternoon, at 3 O'Clock, The ease
came mp again according to adjournment. The Court
room was dcnsey crowded The mother not
present IUr was the young lady produced III Court
according to the cxigency OF the writ. The husband
and plaintiff Geo, Taylor, was prescott. He is appa-
leutly about "A years of age, of dark complexion
stout built md slightly pock.marked. lie was well
dressed in black suit, aud looked very much Ike
most dry-gOods CLERKS which, We understand, IS his
bushes.
Mr. Busted appeared for the first time a one of
the counsel for the mother of the young lady.
Mr.. Mathews, for the respondent, began BY reading
the return TO the writ the object Of which IS to deny
EXP the detention Of the prisoner as charged In
the writ.
TIE return was as follows:
Said Emma her daughter and sixteen years OF age on
the h day Of December 1851 and that she i ignorant whether
said pioner has been legally married TO said Emma. That
she Las teen informed by said Emma follows Thai Tire
her son and said Emma and said petitioner sud one s Ford
VITO claims be eyaaw and cerH Of the Supreme
and Thirteenth street to Wsaks Thraer Omnibus
iLs they all got out of the omnibus together and the e.podeq
and the OF this respondent ard laid petitioner entered the
ibeater together
lOIRT-PcOpe n.
A. WiehtChy and Comfy Of NeD Yo,t s'-The said Mar
Wright makes her the wit Of habeas corpus sued
INST Sh states that she has tie said Emms A. Taylor.
called il Tie said wit in her custody power or under her
power restraint 49,
Second She further that she has not had the said Emma
in her power custody or gnter er any tune SUP
said Emma has she ever transferred 'ch CUSTODY or re-
i6Hs: An5 tie ssia Mary A. Wright frrtlnr says that
b, respondent supposed that said Mr. Ford and said Emps were
following them that this respondent discovering that said Emma
dfofg
cou Papy sPse TO said Taylor snd s'sd MN wner saa
vro..dcd TO the house Of Mr. Moe AZ No MINI street IN
The City N,wfork while said Morel ard nj bis fanny were
sbcut Their being there some person nsIrea A. Ses
1e,pd at said Emma and said William s. Ford mad gone to
.aid house directly from the thes"r uPn ils o on m o
bus nnG were III heiling Nfs "n I.i w. ne c"r,ymsn or
etlg hmslf Mr. Henrlz who had come there rom Df4pH
Locd los said TAYLOR informed aid Emus tie day PREVIOUSLY
and had received fee Of % FOR biz seice'i ,ha sad hn
9i% G s. ~ m ms, n r 5HI nap bat .sd Taylor
rlred aud -sd Ford ;gd him not 20 defer L. a1i e. ya
Emua that himself bad Gland, riLey narf"d asSns, e
wishc. o, bis paer aud urged her to eone %
sud rrsc6See the s.d Emma and aid Tayo aud wis
and ssid Taylor strrward returned 20 ne tL'''' ~ oopJ
with odd Shrsogue said Ford sud said Emma cinr
the said ,h-ater that his responder; rad no Sn2~ss
suspicion Of the matters Aforesaid until ic Monday ~
thai said Finn the of this Pond ut o. ,.
day syrrg M. oh Of January AID ssd Taylor came hefe
also, and tsis pouceIt further ssy. that on ~ o. ~
viii With N sn7 reeirt control iofeuce OF authority sIs,
by this other pe'son artlh1 OF NJ
OF .u- ou ard has not rrtuTred ADf TINS e'p'hun
fnth.r that she ItOrueJ b. SAID Ia
,hi- re,oIrnt that -ory whit %. hs- d"nS -
y.ry snTiog. To- I bend the said T. tnd that I
would never lrye wit him under any 80,
hi. r-sordeut further sy that abe Is inoruit SUI .
said peti,or, has no money a. means u , q
,Sisy 81 hon. &eCpwhich IL IN the t"Lp'TsY w
n - M bsn,s who have fired IL s'nes AZ M
fy,bT ~ ,bst .he Il informed BY shh EHHs qua verify
L,xes s2ch alleged msn1gs Ia, never zen
AID iii. reuor dent urthe. ssys ina, ue cas- ll AZ tHs
inc, aid h dSy January lst eicie1 any co.Io. OF
-, aid Emma IN any way raie'e out 90 p con.
80 T tba. .he liberty % ct &c she CHOSE aud
81 "a ndeu could and would not eNsrce any re-
1 ana aid EDns replied that she would not ucer
s.le is, with ssd Isylor Sad nosins has occurred
-, 80 fo change such liberty free dopl u ressnt,
an I'm. - sny kind whatsoever AID Sne /. informed by
-. 49, and beiests that she has ssClded tho petitioner
-, - I, ar ~ rersoual sio..Ice.
'Aioosn " - - (ssned) MARY A. WRIGHT
motion was made and argued TO strike out po~-
,;o, az this return irrelevant Judge Sutherla Il
dsu;ed The motion, he knew OF pra tice author
Inv for striking oat any portion o. return. This
would be proper III regard to tnys but in return
10 witt OF bahesscO corpus oil The matter must stand
.hcrgh Of course only that Viii met he allegations
of tie writ would be OF any weight
Mr. Sears, for Mr. Taylor, then read the following
,rrveTs-. I, the above return az follows:
CeoreT Taylor TIE petitioner ito r.lrn tas re-
rcnt The wit 81 hsbsl corpus he granted and ..ys:
F Tbst the ssid respondent has the sid Emma A. Taylor
% esrd IN The aad wTt Der custody under her power and
res;rs.nt a. b. Il informed and beieVss.
,S T.f the ssh -ponteI has al ssd Ernf IN he
pcrT rid cry ssd uEeer her res.fsn seno time sree