The Texas Republican. [volume] (Marshall, Tex.) 1849-1869, 1858-09-09

M E}roy--l trust that You viii excrse fur.
,her intrusion TO correct some errors Of tao, and
argument in your commeu, on my last commnaica
,ion. did not attempt TO condemn stockholders
for the conduct Of Directors. said that the stock
holders were officially informed OF the execution e.
Deed. tina, they did not repudIa,e H. nor turn ont
the officers vho made IT, but continued them IN
Office. by actually postponing the time Of election
for six months This you cannot and dare mol
DENY Knowing Of the execution OF Tue decd
.hey Sled no bill TO se i aside aud DID nat %
fas, IN u,iundior Ggdfna the dle-yolr state
meni 10 the contrary, Notwithstanding d.
Fowkes and Mr. Post made two applications
for an Injunction, which applications were ta'ly
refused by Judge Frazer tctdp'e there iraS no
e7uig N iieir .W Mr.. Pos, as an excuse for
no, getting m injunction stated that Judge
Frazer bod refused terause The iced ,nls roa
This statement, Judge Frazer has ta'ly denied IA
you know. in letter TO Col NigaL II you
will take the pains to inquire, You viii asceF-
tain that DR.. row kcs did vote on $1,000 600
Of stock and Mr. Post on S230o0000 OF the
si2 600 600 represented at Ncw Orleans aud
tina, Mr. Wilder does rcefse 10 -how to stock
holders the books containing the proceedings Of
the stockholders and directors, for the reason that,
be will thereby be furnishing stick to break
his head"
would he p'ad-to b. informed how Nj, Post
and pr. Fowkcs could have been elected wthon,
voting for themselves when they cast four iilths
Of the votes
nr Towko You say gave q very cordial invi.
ta,ion 10 discuss hi- conduct hsflre be- len, and
therefore son regard my GnonWnetU commu-
nica,ion ~ in very bad taste ! dd see some
two mr. three columns OF twadie about Weighing
bis charartcr AK inst anybody else.s, Published
the afternoon before he len. | did not then,
aud do no, now suppose that his private char
ac;er had anything to do with the validity of the
deed or sale; nor did understand that he Ind
thereby obtained an injunction against publish
ing tie truth as TO the present controversy
You assert that there Herc q greater number
Of stockholders present, at the jun meeting
when DR. Towlkes waa elected than bad ever
before assembled assert that there were not a
dozen. and invite you 10 Obtain the namos from
Nj Wilder, aud publish them with the amount
Of stock On which they vo''d
You think that as The Republican has been
called Fowlkes's Journal | should not seek the
use Of its columns Whilst it was only called
so there might have been question, now that IT
has been regularly elected the organ of the new
board. ani the two thousand suffering widows
and orphans, have been officially invited 10 sub
scribe think /, is the very place in which
the facts should be- published
"a to the CANNON about the two Thousand
widows and orphans and aelrauded stockholders,
It ia a singular fact that DR., fowlkcs could not
obtain the consent of sngif stakeholder III
New Orleans to serve in his new board, that,
before the sale. the stockholders living in New
Orleans met and endorsed MIR Yerger's conduct,
expressed their sympathy with the creditors,
and declared their determination TO in'crposr no
objection to the sale. yon will hardly deny that
they are bona fidc stockholders have not taken
the pains to inquire bn, presume they have Il
fair proportion Of widows and orphans among
them.
Knowing your objection TO publishirg any
thing except on one side Of the question for
bear 10 add more. This 10 tear already too long
TO suit your convenience.