The weekly hawk-eye. [volume] (Burlington, Iowa) 1858-1860, 1858-05-18


!. N '''l. .ss...
Mss Noo I'D.
~ fooNin r {>nGl1l 9 q
a .xS1,.A q We Es7 -. o..
III q II ~ ~ n s.s. a -s.-
y - = ii n H. la q - - =
- = - hss~se ~ ~ SsnAle
k[Hn0ff - y r ~ " ~ Jndi
% Il VI. ~ ,&.>.,.,
bssz 81 z..:sz.ssss HI ~ sss 81 60
80. ! q ! 81 ss8i IS
bectfsn 4. Dan1sN1 80 eivided into -
lclaasse-sho VOLUNTARY CD iavoanntary n,
ierner cssssssing II persons eenseslly she II,
npahlo a na1 theas $500 n66 Who cheosa. 4
eval Me1sslves ~ - psoelsloss Il ths ~
die laaess ~ indisi1eAls n t1ade, who by4s0@l
ftaudaasnt pseessding evinse dispoetiiea 4
wrong thett ersditetA - selne VI sthe1a. r
compulsory eA1ee IT, b1okBDrt n1y eay0 a31cJ
1stel. nj
Section psostdes agsanst payments and
trensfeu MAoe - eMptatton q bankruptcy
Sectaon deeaasss tnes ~ - decses Ct oank
ruptcy tes ute q ~ oenkrupt = hls pFersrtJ
il divesesd. and becenee vested II ~ assignee
But necessary nousehoia ensees mot exceeding
~ va!1e ansea n9naEed Costefe, afo g oe exemps
together WIN Whatever property = exempt from
execution y ne iAss g toe SsA.e.
SessIon gf.nss reieaee g oankrupss wno
fully comply with the requirements Of the act
ninety cays aitsr re decree, ana alter seventy
Gays s0velsass4e y. e poone newspaper, m
iess oue ~ sxss u, - n1MOsr sno vaiue 0i sne
c.solsOs. ~ .ueis .Ilstsn o'sssns- also pro
II If&V41. DOeClNG# the
coSsse g ee pursued 70 eppea.s
oecu0n Zine properly q Dankfupts = 20
ue uls.osG p1o Vo.o. rseierence = oBiy given
= 49, uIs = .ns on.'eu o'1ses g s1fsIes
~no .'e sus.sssu = pse,eleuce q ~ q N0A-
=. 80. s 80 s'npiCy =. 80 uanH-
w = :" .uiv1us Aos eAceeuio8 sweHsy nse
-,
.,ss. $3.50 -. s KY iun lusse,c.on 70 Oank.
rIp.y 49, s,;.s. sus on'eu o.sses Ds.f,cs
49,. ~A'- u''sSs suss p'ocesanes snail tax
p's Sa..;..o e.. :.
cult Courts concurrent Jurisdiction in certain
cases.
Section directs the manner 10 which o.
signees shall discharge their duties.
Section lO.-The Court shall order 4 collec-
ton Of the assets, . sale of the same, and dis
tribution Of the proceeds without unreal enable
delay.
Section IL defines certain powers or assignees
Section l2-N6 person to be q second time
entitled to the benefit of this act unless be pays
seventy i've cents on the dollar.
Section ls--Proceedings in bankruptcy to be
Of record.
Section IA relates to proceedings against or
by partners'in tr de who become bankrupt.
Section Is relates to the conveyance Of the
bankrupt's real estate by the assignee.
- r
Columbia to have jurisdiction.
Section 9 Furnishes fraudulent assigned.
Section 20 and 81 allow q bankrupt, when his
estate pays 40 per cent. above expenses, an al
lowance of "a per cent: when Il pavs ca ner
cent, an allowance Of per cent: when so per
cent is realized the allowance to be ~ Der cent:
but no allowance to exceed 81. 600.
Section 22-The United States to nav no costs
or other charges in bankruptcy cases.. lsuch
charges to come out of the fund or the parties
otherwise not to be paid At all.
Important Decision Touching Liquor.
n %. e omen Aneaa'
On the ON OF july, 1906, IN the town Of
nocAp pc mass, some Two hundred Of the wo-
.nrn y, ue pace gov togetber, proceeded to
the dinerehs liquor shops, entered them by force.
anu bestowed the contents OF kegs demyohns
.'u uo'''es iheIe was great time IN town
sna. uay, aug y. Tue lena'e moo was not inter
nv rup'eu u'''i i's work had peen accomplished
ne s.ory wen. the rouhos OF the papers, and
w. wy piuoA ~ tne WOMEN was louoiy extoiieo ~
'ne Ma'nerLaw Journals After time, howeE-
sr' tne ana'r was Iorgotten, and nothing has
ceen neard OF the parties who performed the
!eac, uu.'l recently, one OF the ladies' appeared
ia Uour'' VIGOROUSLY Tor the rest, as defendant
y, -, .ne SUIT Drought oy one OF the sufferers.-
lnis SUIT was decided at Salem on Monday last,
ohlei Jusuce shaw presiding, in favor OF the
u ..:e tue ground that individuals are
!us'lneo III destroying nuisance. After hear
ing Judge shaw's charge, the Jury speedily
ioand verdict.
Inc parties 10 the SUIT were James Brown vs..
S1epnen rerkihs ana wife. Mrs. r. was one Of
Tue e, Two nunoreo. Inc court ruled as follows !:
.nese questions arise mere:
l. Jan III persons, without process OF law,
oeseroy sucn liquors!
nave tney the right TO use force to enter
place mot being dwelling house) for this
purpose!
.. Gan large number OF persons combine
70 use force!
1. All persons have right to abste public
nuisance. Ism cases cited by defendants, in
= 1iSiduais may cut down gate erected in
nsgh way, or destroy bridge thrown over nav
s"-S i4uOiS
kept Illegally Tor sale, with the implements Of
trade, having been declared by law public
nuisance every person may destroy them.
=. u kept In shop, not a dwelling house, it
- JusuhaoIe 10 use SO much force rs Is neces |
sary to come at such liquor and vessels, for the
purpose OF destroying them-a dwelling house |
. surrounded with q peculiar sacredness, and in |
that case the rule would be otherwise. The |
aw aooands IN maxims declaring that mans
house Is his castle.
person, then it is justifable when done by the
combined action of many. TT the aet ;s,;ch,
md one may DO it, and if three nav do n
10 not see why hundred NAV not do it.
1t lie high right TO be strictly construed.-l
There is danger in taking law into ones own
lands, and that must be most lamentable state
II society where such necessity exis,s do
lot see that the presence or approval Of hus-
lands and fathers, magistrates, policemen. min.
sters Of the Gospel, and deacons renders such
ctioh any more justifable. but If iniusti6.
bic would mako II al the nose s,c,,;dhi