New-York daily tribune., 1858-11-22

Maurage agt. DldleT.--SaIne ORDER.
Biting agt. neutrality-suspicious. ior euacnibeut
denied, without costs
The General Term rendered no decisions today.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-Nov. 2o-Besors
Judge BETS.
DECISION rs ADMIRALTY.
Zachariah Seaver al Tbs brig Csnon her tacie Ar
In June or July last Emory II. Penniman, then the
owner Of The brig Caron being in this applied 20 the firm
Tappsn Sarbuck Of this city to act for him brokers or
ws Of cO. rspre.entins the vessel 10 be seswOhy
good repair and obtained from them an advance Of e5o
signed them for their security and that they should further
the % .a be ,qi e es IS' o . 1sh. Of
sIhrass coal on the North Rivei Rondout and early
owner s duly assigned the bin Of adna .d 6os
and agents and under th.f direction. a " libel
II. % % THAT oo to S sHGs' @ , n
City with adns discovered to be unseswoIthy
hubspd had her taken proper berth aud the coal dis
charged nom her for the purpose Of ,ps Un sI
that said declined TO make further advances and the
not supplying means Tor her FeHent the voyage w
having shipped her S crew S e, II, the vo,:se and
Psyne expenditue' be arrested the ve's in th. Court
bands declined further advances to Penman upon the
security Of the bill Of dn OF the vessel o. MS S" IS &
obnng Of what they h.d already advanced had
saR % h al si 'As
pressing his salt to decree hey paid oil h, demand IN iv aua
attachment under the local law prosecuted that suit to aal
judgment execution thereon aud caused the ves. to
selves the highest bidders a. the execution sale the vsse was
struck conyeydt them By the Marshal and they Low
hold ard claim their property having offered how
ever TO release convey Prnnan her former owner
on The satisfaction o, ins sd % co G Ir an o to e. add.
,h decree ssle entered in this cause and all proceedings
cause and appear and defend for such other
further order the premises Court NAV see nj to grant
b. sRs By @Sp sbaT e the ssnd @
e that debt and on .s ss hs
tney wer agents Of Pennrnan under obsaon' 70 him 20 d
chsIse u. ss sa po oe & and voded The respect.
its interests .,,.hsd r,or IN. ,.cer, besors
me- The bearns Of the evidence plainly IS ,na' TapP.n
sarHgck to % o r,n1ms only saS s ao see to to
make to him or for The ship npon h' pesoL IT, I
earned by chip the proposed and to dsbuse h-
ship shu.banos and in 'hsir owl E oi & go
Geieacy of the for the service .he 70 perforuhcr
,eawohine.s being essential condition of the undertaking
But independent Of all questions upon the merit. Of n. ea,
nc ~ S he. q Peansa in not inerrnins
cause and making his spPealto The Court while the sa 10
The libel filed July 2 s5a The n,eriOcutins decree vs'
tkeu September T. the report OF ts- ed sep
ins teadon ssyona. Issued retu,bc tie first Tuesday in
October th,Ieaer under which .is o, IN ne w ys' & was w
lsh Of Sept nber During hat period Penninan vas
in The city urrDs applications to rsPpsn bs sn
o,h,rw.e 20 relieve his Indebtedness.
The notice Of th ,icaon dated the s;h Of Septemosr
After ali the proceed11s had been perfected aud IN eHse. In ,he
direct presence Of Pennmsn certainly 20 aa; win the
,5 81 The css and every step TAX In from its ep,oa
70 s close final sale aud delivery OF the vessel o N;
TIE ts.e OF sts ikc. him al equity 20 set ths proceed
ns aside and require the beaB;s 70 prosecute tn IN scn
snt made oui sssinst them The AFFIDAVIT Penhuan, I'm
putting .aa G TO T.pp.s ssegsf bH in se IN
reply thereto on he part 90 far a. least nat The Court az
nc, % IL ae , ~ ma ssd af p % se,. 70 he son
Sor.over wholly interfere with tast suit
Il ,hs party naking the application sat relief well
founded; because, the poceednss against the vessel are
% PSp,msn 10 her out Of the hands Of her pacha,rrs
Ths 0nu. should be 1pesed upon him 70 p0eeed sTm,Ss
and M .,oiy Th. result Be Obtsiued by
pos ar.ane this burden in the T., instance whou: nvosi
the ppon the purchaser, Of; vessel the nees.s
vindicsns their title undss the sdsreo, whea he by his
negligence acqu allowed - be taken in due course
procedure again. tie ye...: ;u,, o, ,,. x,a, Of
tie Judgment tie purchs.e under IT, that Tsppss stseet
ob.ned they a..isne.s al the Interest in the de-
power ~ continue The scon poses'ed oJ ne Original
sccordnsy deny the motion 70 disturb :he Judgment or .se
r this upon the claim OF Pennnsn he hss soPe rem
By any fraudulent practices of her rurctase either IN ne e
ton .ssinss her or on her ssie ,.,.
P-rnimsn the na decree in the above esnss and
the sale Of the vessel unde execution he'eupon o. dsea
a NssS, fsr Tsrpan stsrbucl Victory Bris-yr, fos
Penriuen
cOuRT OF COMMON PLEAS-GES,x.L TEss-Nov. 80
Before Judges DAILY, BaaDr AID HILroA
v.LrT OF THE PoVSD sIERLiSG-sERvicE or NOTICE.
PROTEST.
Butt, B'ack Gulld agt William Ho,e Co.
The plaintiffs brought fon on bill OF eIcha1ge
q. saoco drawn by the defendants IOs- Williamson u
wss TIED before Judge Brady The pantis on the a pro-
,r,i he bin OF exchange, hch admitted AID ser prov
irs er Of notice protest the deiendsrs claimed lgis
snt The pound sterling e. ~ e. with ten Pcr eIi
"a in,sr, The Jlfre r,.deret ad- mel. 10 fIrsr
NJ ,he plsio,-s arar the defendants for slosSb-us TIE
,nourt claimed with interest tie principal and damase
so r.. ..ryic. of notice The drtend-,s .-d
10 The euer Tern this Court aad the asns - wa ;a;ss
B.nbridse Smith for p.u,is'i cunna' A-Isaieg aud