The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1858-03-14
THIRTY-FlH-rH COnGRESs.
FIRST sESsIO1.


TIE IIcoxr1oN ooSsr1rnoS-As KxcTIyG pERArE.
kr. WADE, (opp) Of Ohio, spoke on the Kansas
woo defending the North from the charge Of aggressons
upon South and contendng that the aggressons
all the other way De, in this connection, charged that
Of Texas and her admission into the Unon In
violation OF the constitution OF the United States, was
enormous aggression upon the rights of the North She
Was admitted with the purpose of making five slave
States with ten additional senator's 70 vote down the
rights Of the North The fugitive slave bill was another
nonsous aggression upon the rights honor, and pride
sf the North It Is badge OF serv'lde and suojecton
that cannot tolerated by freeman. The next aggres
sou repeal OF the Missouri compromise for Shch
there was no excuse pallAon. There used 10 be, he
said something called SouibeIn honor, but IL not
exhb TED on this occasion After replying at length
Mr. Hammond and conrovertpg his charges OF Northern
aggressons MI Wade asked how was possible thai such
should place when whole government
for sixty years has lain PROSTATE Al the feet OF the SouhY
Mr. wade next entered into elaborate defence Of the
aborers of the North from the Of Hr damn md
and others pointing 70 thir In the Patent
Ones and elsewhere evidence OF their civilization and
genius II was not, he said, the prostrate Of
such that the Senator from South Caro- could
his system Of socetyhe might as well enpt 10
make his bed in he'll or erect his edhce over volcano
Nor necessary for the South 10 send is thre ned
missionaries TO North teach such aborers their
power Their interest the State and all that concerns
GOOD government the that OF all others. As
% The degraded class alluded 70 by the senator
be admitted their existence, but he contended that
hey were mostly foreignefs-the sweepngs OF the
Oad Word-ignorAnt and vicious-but nevertheless
eeod democra and the principal supporters Of slavery
in The North slaves In their country, they nalu
rally attach themselves 10 s'aveholders In TINS Mr.
wade next passed the Supreme COURT commenting ON
- Dred deckion, and asserting that is dicta can
md no one excep, in s Court Address
= himself 70 Mr.. HAmmonds boast that stakeholder
hsd the nation for sixty years he Wadej admitted
xush but conepded Vas only through tns sd o. ina. set
f men not new the world Tor Moees encountered them
IN me Wilderness ~here turning from the visible glores
The ,,n,isn n%shs. s. VA" rosse %sn Sunsered After
he nsshpos Of Egypt Tney ~ere national men
ey were not sernern men WIN n re,
net Of this Class 10 Judas lscariot and Was-
hgou and his associates bad encountered them frequent
" Mr. Wade then turned 10 Kansas, and IN the course
q his remarks alluded 10 the bill Of Mr. roombs, say
mG he had curious history about that clause, he
aid was originally attached TO that o providing Tor The
but when Afterwards u was debated ~ the Committee on
Territories at the house OF their chief was stricken out
A SRrAros--For peculiar reasons.
nr wApr-For very peculiar Reasons -.
Mr. wade correcting himself said he had just been In
formed n eht not been debated by the Committee
/ ON Territories but by other gentlemen.
Several ssnssors here stated .ne' M o,,ous ,n1
dram Of the bill Most OF them believed that DID not
contain such clause. - -
nr MasoS (adm Of Va, here nterooscd q statement
OF the the Senator from Illinois, a. Chairman
q the Oommuse Territories, reported the Dill, since
e.ed he EpssDs s hs % ,ss psops he snsor
frvm Georgia two months Afterwards introduced Dill OF
hhe eharseser containing no such clause s.n % ue.e
M
Il which subsequently reported The bill which Ater wards
passed the Senate.
sassd amid some ocuusoo ned BY Senator's re
queseng Mr. wade 70 90 on, said that he regretted that
him What be said when this question came up some
weeks As, he asserted. see proceedings Of Dec
He did say that the distinct proposition Of sub
m,uson OF the Constitution 10 the people discussed,
eve S say on occasion referred 70 that impression
vs. conveyed mind that the intention ofthe roombs
bl vas 4, bring Kansas nto the Unoa by popular
vee that one being vote for delegates Conven
oSuo Mr. Bsler again referred 20 his integrity, saying
ths. be represented proud aaa nooae psppe % se ree
uas that Kansas 10 be brought IN with one vote
I'd that constitution was not 70 be suomistei TO the
n wnsos (opp) Of Mass., asked the Senator Il he did
so1 r,ahe speech Kansas last summer advocating the
submlssion OF the constitution 10 the people
NJ R,crss-rhai d very pertinent have not been In
She habit OF making speeches on Kansas Once did ad-
aress The people on Kan nen saa ,ne s.
NJ ssoosslos % Copp Of CALI moved tha, Mr. Douglas
Of The subject until Monday. He enembered
very well the circumstances when this matter came up
S,d not have very dstpct recollection Of H. thougbt
uush apcussion alluded 70 had token place, when the
senator from Illinos distinctly denied H.
Mr. BrgfFR-He did not
Mr. BRoDvpx-hy impression, sir.
M pIeIrR-Your Impressions are wrong, sir. He was
s.ss,or nom California seeks 70 place this matter IN
fAlse view before jhe Senate. .s..,
Mr.. Rnopxcx-xMy memtry must 90 very uescnerous
the senator from Pennsylvan ~ correct lie hoped
he senate would ADJOURN When the senator from Illinois
In his place, shall know whether the senator from
lvania oorrector no4- Ny impression s sht he
dsd deny H. He thought from the uemor that -
senator (Bser) exhibited -hen he rose that he was socn
y Mte back all he said.
Mr prcu3 lopp) os Ohio ,houebs he could relieve the
from Penney vania of Of bis tmoarrsssment-
by stating when The up he, ~ the
kieni Of both the gentlemen from Pennsyivans and III
bcs had brought them together, and ss impression va
hat Mr. Heler correct, and that the conversation
nuded 70 usnspred in another Of the where
rhe Senator from Illinois did not hear H.
Mr. RetER-whst the senator from Ohio says s per-
grcxly correct may be remembered that he (Biger)
atatnc,y stated on former occasion that he did not
now whether the Senator from Illinois participated in the
diseusson For the rest, II did not become The Senator
Non California describe the manner (referrng 20 his,
n RisIer tremor) IN which he made the expasaton
NJ psopFpcW owed 10 the senate and TO the Senator
NOM Wlno,s 70 state that days since, when vas
urderstcod that the senator from New Bsmpshre in-
"a aude 10 this matter, the Senator from Illinois
tim ted he would denounce the statement this ssor
Ss falsehood II the Senator did not qualify r.
Nv RaI,S-Nothirg OF the kind ~ on record. The
.nator fyom LIMOS said no such thing.
NJ. RmDsRuS-;So thls is question " yers;ity1