New-York daily tribune., 1858-07-16

~ IT,. i's, .ss'r ,ss; u eSs,-,. -. lSss.-a,nk
os fiD 7ssIiss % ..srsu>s = .s,s e. .es
ss - 80 ts ,e5 No Cse 90 g .sss ,..,. 80
- .s - g 9s 50, .sesp 80 N. s..'et -s. rss,,.
go L.u h iss ts,a5s-,s r' n'se fsi .ss,
snSt Evi tse FvSd ~ ssns foaassd .1ses.t
co-.ol Il e,us "a ;a.5stoe fati,s sarPs, "a,
q, a 80 - ., . Ni,sd 9 tsys ee-r m,e- y .As "a
',stsat' ~ TIE S'Se 70 gay as ssstr sii. Sossss ,~s
tsu yr,n Pi'ou he q, o-ts assys sx.Ss &c ssess
~. ~ II it se: ssus.' -l cr,eri5e Th-fs..os
~ sc s>i dspsse cf the pops-T. MIGHT ~
6.,- Sea tie day aasi tss P'oH's Tss cay sAs
II s p.riis rs, e,rut vcrs BE- orisnsy sc.oe N.ss
uo.- There 10 P-Seass os coz 'ie. sest
not nzse 9. ssSaGen vat. The nstsrsp
thew q s. p.4, 81 ~, 20, uti i cooa b- s'c,rs.s.i
Wheeler TEE wod be paid ., 20; IA; .sy sErs.A .s.y
eoIeiiy these sisst ssssa e,hss~,. a,rs~ i
Fnntst subject 20 levy on eNrs atens Iee eeeseaes
~ tss sts or ,sS tscsy la
wsch us,srsS SsiSis IA. ,oS VS.. cuss ~ rs.r. -
a. E as as a. P.s7ss'y AZ no, pay :. q. s:.
seea ojvL. bs csn;uiasd BY the s.assass:
=, lAd os tt Sra,c. the s,.s m.ec y e.i..tt
eotGon ;hs: a. Tie detesdAa' esss IA aalse IA
ssg,I Thesei, prr,er'e for ~, aes.ao. or tr,aL
FvA Ths irivnc!oa too sea.r. .ad co@r-.Asas,. =.
e ,Ae Whole any part Of ~ lssat,n. p-opsstI
Tie following are his points IN opposition to tie o.
F, Ii thers were uri,3c os graz. hs To- rrcsss
there csn De no eottemP. n dsobeyias L.
tt 70 maie th uoSor bu, .vca ,hey wee ia csnseap
that would res sIy tue s' is 10. uoton for favss-
IiG ifia- IUgncoa sr,aei -,A iurl.ilfass s., s
ord Re rn,ca,b sDd the tefr6sns eecaei BE- ia
temp. then -, punishment shod rso': BE- oounA hae
F0a,n There 8 70 ey'eeece hx any poPes;y waeA -.
tac,iore hsse proof s, zoe Ia. s.a ves~A
Fh Treie &C pgoo. hat ihe pantas have been.
cp tcr Il, reasons ses.d ae.s pAsss
have an sscensii wsss Sue. ,aea Zen SS's rs
te correct ce.ed ae lien in isv's s the saa
In. ,lbesto which the S''saed properly passed Ssss
NJ. Fieidss points on the defendants ,nc.os to dls-
solve or modify the ,jurction are As fellows
Ir,t The iisht of al nsoy,nt debtor 70 dispose 81 as
property as he Essse. sh, which the Courts ~
vita escusy ard restrict whent they can tA~e est o
issy equrss property ,aeud -
SOL In the prent cas-. d. s are
justify the Court In holding ihe ie.enSs bound risees
sHd' trustees 70 the immediate application Of al her prep
e,ty to ne f.nept u es sopo''or' o. tie deS' dI' %
the N at the time Of thelr tsiluse
fixed ndan. with to bold s.I property ter tss
% q ths, c!s5,o and to 'pR =, sI S,; FSy,
foarfs; The pretsn.s p, oA by tho dend.ss. ,A. =.
sqs. whic e promised wa, sqs,, Ssy .p,' "a a a' rsa ssa
Tse promise uncondions II these meas ressss
ton on the pslt Of tn, teplan that Uns .S~Ai he
Ff,s To .ow the defendant. pr-:.nco Bst.s
they pleased they would thus hsye only TO pTur, Bses
M.n any S e r, ..s pSo % s a..
Sr The fsct now dc!c,ed by the defendants. tha saly
oneArd their creao, into the extension opeses
sud upon the plaintiff aud ie.eses them from the assssasnt
nov due and the detdsrts .hed BE required to usis prev,
on therefor the original i-b Tensned .nd tho pAsas
for tie extension.
Mr. Brady concluded bis argumsn. to day, and Mr.
Field will reply, on the above points on Saturday
mornrg, 20 which time the Court aojournes
GEsERAl THIN.
Php Ferch and Christopher IIeser asi The Mayor. sa u
the City Ot Nsw.i,h
D,ylTs J-The question in this csse Is no. what
se fixtures which 10 at liberty % remove on too etya
premises the en.t9n Of the lease The wen. q. q as
@asei de den.ed PREMISE, srd a. the Improvements ,hss
may been placed thereon By the id p.t.. Of the "a
P Sd ss s. ct s. sa % saT psI %ss II
e s as ~ss ~ 'sGa & aS S .ns.
S & . 19s ne term. 81 h' u . s '.,y
or edition asas PAT OF erected rpos d pem.s
mPson II The parties 70 ,he lssss =, h. tue Of a,.as
hat cxsn,e improvement changes or a.eAons uee 10 ~
and Eugos . they might PIT 20 aud
alterations and were to 10 made ct the erre:s
the e.sees The e.'o consented 20 rh sheraton. and s-
po condition hat at ,s kpiAon VI tas lease tAev
70 and become the property OF tue leo,s sad Ne
ssees IN confederation OF such permission to maxe stesusne.
repss aud Improvements ae expiration Of the leass 70
% n up u perm m '1S To sosrn.n, i -
the Improvements that may have been placed thereof
on alteration erection annexation made By tao ,ee.s
tne der rbed g. to render tho premises mere sscasta
.1S word . sna asss
sri such sieion. as he aw might not regard 6ssor.s
would b. ciicu to select more comprehensive word snd
where the pae. that al improvements ehh msy be placed
the premise, .hs belong .othe e''o,s !, eheat to ~
taken by the Common Pleas o Eoand NOT ais
n,a to he present Mes. ast. Bakewsy. Manning ssd
Grasr In hat the tensn, had coyen,si to yie'd
exps,lon Of hi, term al erecoas ana Improvements
a. t6s. 20 y the IsaoSs e ne .s.s. sai
seenhouse .reied durps the term, tho framework
nd nt.8i- in oitsr thereon Tts JUDGES psss
. fupos Of avoiding 81. di.cg.ion. wh.t m!.
he coniideec coming within the description VI hraIs tie
IA
the assumption hat The house vase f1ts tat
the coen,nt 10 surrender s erecors aud mprovsmsst
think parties this intended tho surrender
snd The otter 20 receive snd scosP The termination of ths
The elsn. during lease and that such improvements
bsced all additions eectons aesons m.ds BY tae tenants
msnt Of the lease expiration the, became che property q
the ssors ard they hsd night - eisn thu anen.0 u
enru.rst,d comp in action eHbr.ee< 10
he the plaintiffs sarr'ods, ths any OF tSe
and an only. trial be had cost sde ths sveaf
Mc..c. VIM M Eyut. and X. H. Bovine i,r pa,tas Msssn
II. Busted and A. r. Lawrence, j., for deteadant'
SUPERIOR coURT-spsci.l Trss-JULY b-Bsbos
Judse BDsw ORTI.-DEClsiO>s.
LYONS sgt Hsys.-At the time this suit was com
msncs6 plaintiff actually residing II tao Guy Of ne--
Ycrk resided and U resides there AID sres.s
intention to permanently s:ds there tho m''a ta ~ ns
Weinste.n ast. Hart.-Defendant hss appealed frco
AZ , der motion 20 -. a.ds an nques. tsk,n by e.
s AID az. fes stay o prccsedns lnl h, .ppo. b
heard The FOR answering the -hsn tsss3
s NJ . @ % % sa GaTa aor M s Of OF s q. s e. ns:.
that shown ene the dss-Ec.ns 70 opss tao
desut But h. counsel evidently think. Otherwise, AID ssS
may granted paying the t,et s,.tss e IssaIs:os
rhsr orier o ths Cou tb suoun. oy adsmsn with IN
and Sheriff fees, TIE svy Of the execution MAY H's
~'hd'"n 'n D'''f s,s o. co q Iep,". Rp,sT @ notion
Kreaid sgt. RamsdalI, ac.-Judgmsn, for plsa.
m. r.. Tex an for--JudRmeDS0