The Washington union. [volume] (City of Washington [D.C.]) 1857-1859, 1858-06-04
NEWS BT TEI4EGRAPH,
Further Detais ofrors1gn Nswshy the AnAe'

HALIFAX june S.--in the ho~o "a Aosus ea She Is's
ult the Earl OF Derby stated that the governs no"
that morning received important dispatches from India
containing, among other mattcrs representation io"
Sir James Outram - - The severity % the proclamAu
and Lord Cannings reason for Issuing II. The papers
being copied and he promised they should be III the
hands Of members Of Parliament before the divinon M
the other house en- the same evening y ~ tI ~
In the House OF Commons the debate ON the vote Of
censure was resumed
Lord faAmerpon res eAtfacts nom the letters
ed by Lord Canning to Venen Smith, explanatory OF the
reasons why tho proclamation was In some parts 70
severe and In soma ~ tndulgent fi
Mr. Bright spoke In strong terms of condemnation
Of Lord Canning despatch and declares that he woud
do nothing towards restoring the late government 10
power. 1hfan
Sir James Graham, In telling speech declares no
should most unhesitatingy vote against the resolution
although he did not altogether approve Of Lord Ellen
boroughs despatch.
There were numerous other speakers both sides OF
the question, when the debate was further adjourned
Mamesbury stated that he had received reply from the
government Of Naples In answer to the claim OF ndem
nifty which no understood TO be refusal and which he
had treated such Within the last two hours how
ever; he had received despatch informing him that II
was not positive REFUSAL but simply an argumentative
reply.
The House of Lords adjourned until the 3st for the
Whitsun holidays. ae saa
la the House of Commons the vote of censure was
taken up and after numerous and repeated calls upon
MIR. Cardwell by the liberal members to withdraw his
resolution, that gentleman, with the concurrence u
Lords Pslme0n and John Russall aud with the author
y Of the House generally consented and the resolution
and amendments finally withdrawn thus virtually
giving the ministry triumph. sg4r
Mr. Dsrael in giving In his consent TO the withdrawal
said the resolution avowody brought forward az
censure upon the conduct OF the government he con-
scented to its withdrawal it must he clearly understood
that he did not because the government shrunk from
the consequences that would follow if 1t were adopted
Whatever the result might be- they looked forward to it
without apprehension and now were ready to en-
counter the consequences of division. So far the
debate concerned he thought he might say that
ministry on their trial could look back upon discussion
with greater Satisfaction The opposition TO the motion
had been maintained not by the administration for they
had wisely and properly withdrawn much possible
from the debate, but by members not connected with the
government in politics, and by inferior to in
intellectual character and authority. He consented to
the withdrawal of the notion not for the sake Of the
but for The sake OF India and the best inter
ests Of the empire
In 10 doing he appealed to tho language OF all their
dispatches to show that the government had given
Lord Canning most cordial and complete support and
he would mention that since Lord Elenboroughs de-
spatch had been sent out the had commun
Gated with Lord Canning informing him that he might
rely upon their continued confidence and support
Cheers ~
The House of Commons then adjourned to the 2Sth
The correspondence between Sir James Outam and the
governor general of India throws light upon the
proclamation of Lord Canning, and mainly led to the
withdrawal of Mr.. Cardwells motion 1t has been pub
lsed and shows that Sir James Ouram earnestly and
strongly protested against Lord Canning's confscaon
policy but without effect
The London Tines in its city article refers to the i'm
porancc of the treaty between the United States and Nj
caragua and the efforts which being made in the
States obtain exclusive control of the transit
Allusion ia made to the obstacle which the Clayton
Buwer treaty presents annexation and the consequent
attempt to have it abrogated The Times argues that the
treaty il permanent and there Is power abrogaon
on either side and concludes by saying that certain
narties in the United States may resort to unscrupuous
to secure their ends the whole one that
papaby requires all the sagacty and rmness of expert
enced statesmen which, it nsnuates are lacking in the
present British cabinet.
In regard to the Parliamentary proceedings on Friday
the Times says Sir James Outrams dispatch broke the
camel 8 back mountain of work had to be done in
one night 80 when the House met there arose an almost
Simultaneous cry from the benches about Mr. CALDWELL
begging for mercy The suppliants were SO numerous
that il became almost necessity TO listen to the and
after parley with the opposition bench the resolution
was withdrawn Whatever the success of Mr. Cardwels
motion could have done Lord Canning he has more
in another way from the given last night by
the Chancellor of the ExcheQuer that the cordial
and sincere sympathy and support had
sent out to the Governor General
The Herald reoices in the triumph of the ministry
which It believes will also be received with enthusiasm
by the country 1t declares the government would have
had an overwhelming majority. ~
The Daily News says 1.-THE House of Commons has
rarely presented more singular and exciting scene than
that of the great faction fight ending In compromise.
No one who really has heart the dignity of the House.
the welfare of the country and the safety of India can
regret the result The liberal party feel we'll salts
fed at having escaped the necessity going the bust
cal r,a nf hal horoI