Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-01-20
NOTICE.

Talliaferro, and others, Oomplai,.ants,
= as. s@s 81 80 fS srR
Patrick, and others, Defendants.
IN CHANCERY.
ITO Alexander G. Taliaferro and Agnes,
j his wife, William Marshall. Mary NJ.
Archer, Fielding L. Marshall. James F.
Jones and Ann L., his wife, John T.
Smith and Margaiet L., his wife, Thomas
Marshall, Eliza Marshall, Robert L. Dou-
that and Mary A., his wife. Mildred P.
Marshall, Jacqueline A. Marshall, Elliot
NJ. Braxton and Ann NJ his wife, Ellen
NM arshall, Jacqueline B. HOWE, Mary
Howie' Ellen Howie, Anderson Wade and
Susan, his wife, w. NJ. Howie. Ann How
ir, Jno Marshall, A. A. Marshall, Jas. E.
Marshall. Fielding Douthat and Mary w,
his wife, Jas. X. Marshall, Edw. C. Mar
shall, Jannet R. Harrison, Geo. D. Fisher,
Lucy NJ. Norton, EdW. c., Fisher, NC.
Kenney and Mary A., his wife, Mary
Fisher, Raleigh Colston, Ann F. Colston,
James G, Paxton. Jas. w. Massie, B. j.
Jordan, Samuel f.. Jordan. George Fish
or surviving executor of E., J. Canning
ton, dec ID, George-F. Harrison, Edward
]. Harrison, Carter H. Harrison and
Henry Harrison plaintiffs. and Spicer
Patrick and Virginia his wife, Aaron
Stockton, William Tompkins, Joel Shrews-
bury. William Dickinson, Samue! Steele,
Robert C. Steele, John Alexander, Sam
uet Alexander, Susan c.. thornton, Ann
NJ. Wilson, Barbara Wilson, Sally Will
son, Ann G. Marshall, - Marshall,
Emily HOWE. Mary Fisher, Lucy G.
Fisher, Susan L. Colston, William s.
Wilson, Betty A.. Fitzhugh, Mary A.
Harrison, Margaret L. Marshall, Fanny
Marshall and John Marshall defendants
in the above Chancery suit: r.5f
~ Take Notice, H. IT, ~
That at the Fall Term 1856, Of the Circuit
Court for Kanawha Co. and State Of Va,
decree was rendered in the above cause,
ordering, among other things, reference
of said cause to John L. Mosely Esq. "a
Special Commissioner for that purpose
appointed, with instructions to report up
on the title of the land mentioned in the
Bill and sought to be divided and rarti
toned in said cause, embracing the, fol
lowing enquiries, to wit: =, .-.l. -
"Tst. Whether the claim of title, To
John Steele nineteen thousand FIVE hun
bred acre survey, is correctly stated in the
Bill 49,. ~ = .2E T.
end. Whether the several interests oil
the present owners Of said tract of land
are correctly ascertained and set out in the
Bill. -... r.. ...'g ..>..>t.
81. What is the interest Of each own
er in the whole tract? -. A.
4th. What is the interest of each own,
err, to whom lot B., is assigned, in said
lot B. ...r,'....' -. ~. .% A.. -. ~
9Th. What is the interest of each own,
er, to whom lots G. and E. are assigned
in said lots c. and E. : =.
9th. Aud that said Commissioner re-
! port any such other and further matter
as 10 him; may seemproper, or any of the
parties require" & So +
And take notice, that I:have fixed upor
Monday the felh day ofJanuary 1887 a:
the time, and the Office of Parks anc
Mosely in the town Of Charleston County
of Kanawha and state Of Virginia, as tn,
place, for complying with the foregoing
acquisitions of said Decree, at which time
tand place.any of the parties who thinl
proper may attend. -'..- ...\
JOHN L. MOSELY,:~
X. ~ Special Commissioner.