The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1857-05-20

esdard, Or kenn or any ether person who rs bse.
- - witness, or whose services have bean snpisysa
ths proceeding
Did ysu bring 70 This country nom yfanse q n.sls.A,
any sers Of credit drawn by the Rosehhds, upon Az
guAs Belmont, Or upon any other personS
: Did you bring moro than one'
sncs your arrival have you not received another st
~ 4 credit drawn by Rohschiids upon Belmont or On
ny ssher housef
NJ Busteed offers 70 show that In adusn 70 letter Of
sdk 70 by waess, for 70 900 francs no rs
snse resolved two other letters or credit each for
hNnss, drawn by Rothsohilds on A. Belmont ana aao
~ witness for his services and testimony m w 0aa''
nave you got your possession or unas, your co.. q.
~ wn,i you your , rppGSsa
Q Is there seal 10 that writinsf
Can you state for what specific purpose or purposes
yea are by tina. writing constituted attorney 10 s Tor the
not the appointment Of power In that writing
,o.d eomuany in civil suit commenced by that company
the Supreme Court Of the State Of New York, sgains,
CHARLES Carpenter, Louis Greet, Eugene Greet Fehce
Dubud, Auguste Parrot, and Guerini
Have you not sworn that this was the whole e,son.
n the power Of your appointment under this wriing9
sAme Exhibit 90 is admitted To be copy Of the com
Paint In the above entitled suit
Did you swear 70 verify the complaint In That action
Mr. Busted offers to contradict the testimony Of witness
- 10 Carpenter.
Hiness-I did, sir.
@ Is this complaint true in every PARTICULAR A. There
might be words which would not suggest take,
but The frame of the complaint Is true.
q Did you say "yesW A. said "yes," but not
without this qualification.
Q every statement Of fact contained In that complaint
rue o. therein allegedp A. Yes, sir.
he affidavit annexed TO copy complaint, exhibit %, Is
admitted to be true copy Of the oeginal affidavit
g DID you make this adayt' ,t A. Mr. a0rr0sh says
@ Is every statement Of fact contained In this affidavit
true, therein allegedf A. The sense Of the meaning
O. Repeated A. have said that the sense and mean
ing Of the English then appeared to me true, when
o Repeated A. The facts are stated therein, but II
submitted to could suggest different translation 70
b taken nom the last paragraph Of this affidavit the
phrascology in English Is different from the French, but
he meaning is the same 70 me; see some words thA.
would exactly translate from the French ~ they
nero, but the frame Is true.
Q lake the paper and state the words to which you
refer nowf A. will take only one example," The de-
ponont further says that the said Eugene Greet Fecite
bubud and Paro combined and confederated with the
mid Carpenter and Louis Greet TO deceive and deaud the
sai plaintiff and aided and assisted the said Carpenter
and Louis Grele in disposng Of the said property know
ing, &c. knowing, Is very far from the name,
Eskcite Dubud and Eugene Grelet"
@ With the exception that you have now stated, Is
every allegation OF that affidavit true as therein alleged
4 Yes, is true; see the word "hduciary" almost
q Did you read the original afrdaviti A. did; am
saasned in reading affidavit to understand what IL
Hsans, and certainly understood this one.
Assuming this copy affidavit 10 be an exact transcript
- the original in every word, do you understand this In
sand the precise meaning Of the word nduciary" bat
understand It's meaning in the connection IN which en-
Q How do you know that the Northern Railroad Com
ycoy Is an incorporated company
Q DO you kaow whether it Is an Incorporated company
under the laws OF companesS
Rued out Exception.
o What books Of the company have you had access 70
Ruled out
o What vouchers, bills, bonds shares Of stock and
Cher valuable things belonging to said company, or do
posted with them for safe keeping, or otherwise, were In
= The compaints A. The books Of the company in the
ooe; vouchers other kinds OF memoranda; cannot
ranslate IL into French bills meant receipts bonds
scnsaticns and coupons shares referrod s,ock-ihe
stock Of shares in that say mean generally every
ming pat up there in The once M . o. me company 0hos
q Do you know DavidS A. know him now, since
have seen him at Court since the beginning Of tne
br N what room; ! made . complaint against David A.
Isng ago as September q, 1851.
eth, and In writing and different from the complaint I'M
Aeg oath and In writing which forms the basis OF me pro
ssn, proceedngf A don't remember making any before
O. 10 ,ou Know George W. Mortoni A. know gcn-
ueman by the name Of Norton don't know his first name
q nd YOU ever make an afndavM In this case before
q. Did you ever make one before Richard E silwell
4 don't remember.
O Did you make before J. brigham or O. 7. Bettsf
A Don't remember having, whether did or not.
o Did you ever talk with psydS A. never did, nor
heard him talk o wa s rnyScS kn'" VINO 0d
O How do you know hat David was ever In the employ
q This company
A. don't know whether David was ever IN the employ
e The company; don't know Capt. Lconard have seen
him very likely don't know whether David Was present
q not when talked with Grelct or Parrot
@ Were Greiet and Parrot Nsethers A No;
q Was any body with themi A. When 1 saw Parot
emo were present. don't know who's whoo talked With
0reet some one came In the room; don't know who.
q Did not you In Court yesterday te! Christmas 'nat
name; when Christmas came In We stood up talking be-
hind the rail; think We talked In French didn't tell
him where they sat; Christmas didn't ask me which was
David; nc asked me only where Carpenter was could
ncG see him; told him he was there; don't remember
2, re pc my pscoeou very rood for Ger Ain
ShnRs-for interesting things which strike my mind
should recollec conversation Tor three monhs with Bus
tesd: should generally remember conversation three
months word for word; knew Carpenter few years;
sanr reoollect exactly say four or ave; don't know
Do you reoolect Distinctly the TACT when you arst
himS A. don't
DO you wheref A. In his once; aon nnoW nov nov.
four or Eve talked with him when srss saw him Gar
s gave ,U%s ss (. sDd . 1oa
Objection sustained Exception
Q Where did you next see himf A. saw him two or
three times about this business at bis Office; next six
months Afterwards, and ~ Intervals OF ak or eight
months. .
q when did you last see him 10 Parish A. II year
end half ago; knew Robert; don't know his FIRST name;
suppose you the cashier knew Robert about same
ume didn't attend his funeral nobody was cashier al
The time; last In Paris, In september 1855; had
been In Paris In July 1856 didn't see Carpenter them
don't know OF my own knowledge that Carpenter vas
cashier he wasn't cashier when Rhrs saw him Tour nve
years ago; never saw minutes kept by the Board Of
Directors OF the Railroad COMPANY; don't rcooect who
her Carpenter glasses whenI rst saw him at Paris
don't recoect whether be mousache or whskers
nor color Of his hair whether red black don't recole
whether his eyes black or blue first saw Carpenter
N the United States, October 17h recollect the dateb
sers wrote 70 my director and remember the l7lh be
cause remember he arrested on the 1oh think The
nrs complaint included CArpenuer but don's recolcct
Ill thai about Carpenter his being cashier and the
alleged taking Of shares, know before september 2Tth
had instructions 70 proceed against Carpenter Of tina
time.
O Didn't you bring with you any letter from the gov
Of France any person In hs country in refer