New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-03-03
Order 10 be enter, pursuans TO referees report
sUPREME COURr-GESESsL TsEM-M,scH 2-Bso'
judges RoosBvsLr, Di'fEs and PEABODY.
.crps 90

judges RoOsBvELr, Dt'tEs and fHABobf
SorPs % HAsD-COSsIDKHATIOS.
Ackarmsn at Enrtsh
ROOSEVELT, J.-Ihe defendant ~ sued A. indossd
OF proinLssory note duly protested TOR non payment.
He inc orsel the before ls delivery TO mo pyeoe,
as security 70 them. This alleged IN thu ooDpetst
and denied 10 HE answer. He only says Ne roeeseef
no vnlue IL was not necessary that should. Value
wa, parted with ny the pages the strength Of hb
Endorsement tbs. Is credit Of fOur months Vas given
to hA brother Such q c9DsldersL)n s suih ,icnt In
law i a. good consideration az goods bad eeen
delivered ~ be indCrssr himself The expression
Vslue received in the body OF the note Is the zane
in tCt as II had been repeated 0ye the defendants
III naiure on tue bsch. no whole 10 one instrument,
made and delivered q ons and tho same Tune. IL mus
be construed together. And a. % the Jeiepdan II ",
Ia sw written eng cement Tor value received ex.
pressing slsD IN wrlng tho confederation - reqafsd
by the -iatpej, 10 phy he noe g. maturity on odiuoo
OF dac eu lad O. tne maker End due n2Ge u p.o'ss
10 tho .ndcner. such cOnsdef U Do The jusuoa OF
II e case ~ Tia Yesult 0i tie Authorities a. shown 70
the recent case Of Moore Gross decided at the Pros
eat term.
A. 10 he pat psyuer, BY the maacr, ths evidences
proves tina. q WA check fquissod by the isdorsS.
aud thai i Nss intended " ts, end "a equity ought V
BE- applied on the Loso. In Asrespeot our ooocuAons
diner from 00ro II .he referee
new tY.Al ulunt therefore he ordered unless uIe
plaintiff han corent to credit he payment sod iassreS
thercon anil 20 make 9 corresponding redaotiso In hs
amount Vt tie JIG .meDt. Order sooJrdlDEy.
spc-IL TzRS--Be.or, J1d,e pA'iss.
SlJEs srirr ,s,.Es 70 PRAcTILE ~ mn aArIsf
COUET. -
The Por:e rs oe.,se W NJ. st. Tie Judges Of 'a'
An alternative writ OF N andx nus requiring the Ne
e Court O. slow George W. Niles tn pracu, % oesoee
tas trbupsl rs attorney and council or shtw caass
10 tie coatssy vs. granted saturday lat, ~
Jucse Peabody r'tuEabe tbs morning.
Jgcgs Maynard male g return today, 10 roice -
ct 10 u 10 lcS, as s:ACd u rs opinioa shch We
pu5StO2 On t;ds. az r.opn The oase ssa ssjonsea
70 x nosr04 al u q. n
Ar Lsplush a9paarsi 70, the luige' Of tho hsrsss
COR s-d BIZ Dyc'' ior n rea1f.
bs.r- Juess PsAe0DY.
I, $50 - s,ss1.st -. ka.'ns !" i"'4rss
at -Ltrt .ct d.. ~ AZ
III. p,cf, nntcr tIc pr.afye II heSi 70 fes,
fen r ~. snd % 30 re'ua' a - iaqcife 10 -
( r..,,,' &C.,. 70 .ir'sE- . - .'oPeHJ I'''
srflE.oR corEr-T.,.,r. TssN- M'EeaA-Bef''- '''s'
PRO 1.,L. sst Casri,s Iifs-
This il 81 gciIou % IA Inst, uin' 1t ~hefepy uso
! icDdsn. pgOned - pay toe plG.nt'h or %. SsxDs
! 80 Gr to delivery snd uarsorof II share Of
! tie % p.tsl stc,E q Ise la Grange MIiiS'
/ tuiDo saf Transportation C3.npahy.
! Tie .If' -znc-t u quesron zoo y. ia 1000
binds. sroop,re in III % me value Of 'ss. a
Non fraud on no pat Of The pinnt'n In iascV 500
u.llrI,y rfofestrtiDg Re company - ~ ~ hoi,s
M cen Lon sud psoviccd TIh pFny oI oi'aD,uoss
Gas coa UPON der proper y Nal"n 'N-"'' III "''~
-, oge.son o. fraud in The prcmi,er the csss
! ,o,.d coel Of cy:defce was Introduced sa'oo
80 prrp Ire plaintiffs knOwed,o Of the reel is's
! ~ tbc csfe
| soiab s. B4I and James r. Brsdy FOR plsnhn; "a
focque o. Barlow and j. W Gerard iof d"l'nas~~
uxTTD sTATEs DISTRICT ooUET-M"e" t-S'''''
Isp;oun Moore and li~ij sinn Doton stse 9i.s %
, GI-sc q s--'ns Goa 'ef' ~ ''''- i''''