New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-10-08
THURSDAY. OCTOBER 8, 1857.

alf- q
sHt.ci THE TsIHVsF, G. Iue.dsy .ad tep, . tee
I. .rl roi1', .sics By tt. opposite e,erse,.
q, ,S en- s' p s 81 s sS ''e Or ''' "' OF y"
III k wig coP-s u zoe i's', slc-."i 70 Mt Bsu
rrf. bx .s- A,tort.y 81 4r sLsies
Nc u E.ssar srRicr Erw.Y csE Sep, II Isl
JiS5s GorDos Bs,SrTr-S'' Ia IN, N,S Yos He-uyd Of
b 6t r.t.It Ar article apo. Tthe,ls n nf ,ry
suser rpoc hr Dstle o. Aes 10 his Pe.ous potts
-. pl,isn q the attic 70 ~ah Nc sickIes ~, .e.
tct. e bcins mos: sEs-sys',a IL and ir.aa.
ts u .hs witch s.ucss h1 II h latter character
Lave been retained by him t the purpose IL
% ron Of eDcing ISL Ac'on io ssu.s- rpoG
II - ebs,scteI and that no in.i.;s NJ aTss sser trah
y:sr voluntary the verdict Of a. sd tnelssn,
sse lis. be vii be EsFPy 70 ,ean 9m TIE .enp,,ed
p'oc sd % ssr,t you sIen ro tnto which he ra'
i wFs Or or aaIfs sFI CT ~s yGg ar,
as.uoy IL. the prtpsIson aud publication Of ibe in
,o'S In ,,1r d.cl,irinr ,b. truth cf the publication
80 lar At ss e, cslcusted to sact his Professional rel.
er' riIi; ard .tye .u eny e,,Ga. % indie not
thai prteu but greet 10 s in sequence
direction Of M slls thu. delay Cd calling yoar
70 the mse' in The hope that sense Of u.iee to
!. here ..sss.ted Your omission hoevei leaves
sbo.d not htsr from ycu tie of Mosday next
- sh: ,SG n:Se es.
wss , Il. Rcn SSo.ii the Ii.
Ta% b. ren in Nassau street on Saturday the a DAY
Of sept 1881 at about II o'clock g. m ,,o n,.,
No. !6NAssAr srRrtr, Nrv-Yosr. Sept. 4 1851
J.srs GosDos B,SsETT, Esq--Sir Aher my communities
i,l t Il 10 dIcsd to
received Of ny Office in my There W., 5s,AS 5s about
portion. Of the ncloed were marked sround with
sSf ed . s es1 yoa in thu. there
may te Misunderstanding between TO my course be-
fie insulating LEGAL proceedings have i-'oyed to take this no
s r,nded e. St before me the Parssr, s,,eS = II.
enca must bis behalf deny that considered
To. tone Of the editorial eHseedrsy otisGonss and i
the nbeleus article have usdert cd the
that the wss not fixed snd deliberate to def.e Mr
the and in accordance with the obvious import Of
Tie sddressng itself most s.ron ely the mind
Mr i,ats the sathor.6p e. si. srce -so wrote H.
eisosm enphscsy any connection with H. NUT be OBJ
:. Il ys@ Of i si an .n sn
the Iury already done You will underaRd therefore
s ssSpe o thu s Ss d to II dssSed to be
ton and .q1rps nLaer Aoy az ne o.,
with the defsmsory publication I. called for In my first
70 sn h pos
form viii BE- an cad and must then PsT;ue my opy alter
Deli, cree the orss Of which the above /. true copy 10
MI Hudson 10 editorial roon. If Herald Monday sept,
Would $. 1T s H. Huin fs
JNo o. SioHOE'
SUPREME COURT-SPreiM TrR;f-oct '--Before Judge
ROSWELL.
INJUNCTiOk TO fESINAiF THL Lh'h VI Az hNt-
CCTIOH.
In 1853, DR.. Samuel L. Townsend contrsctoi with
the Empire Sons Dressing Company 70 rnsh hio atone for
rses to plsce i up in the building The original
y by parole but reducing to writine or Townsend al
the important clause setting up the stone and 10 snor
Of tie te Town:eId sgned it. Tn. Co@p.ry ts
rnis, snd to setting mp. Mr. Townsend sued them for
dsmsse' nPen tie written Gontrac. sIognns to sScS 81:
attorney above mentioned swore that NJ Tow
been him. and that moreover in ensdeson Of the
Comptnys hsvL accepted other securities in lieu Of those
them nc nc ali dsnsse. had sus'siaed The Company
S b sp s. % de Ss on tine the Ss !:
test mony Mr. Townsend must be decided to have released te
@ u The Ts spa o ba
6m.d by the Court to the Grneril Torn supe
.s.sd that no appeal should be taken the Cou. of Appeals
and el,dough MI Old not conde, the OF
Appeals held that the sppeal could not be Jats
kody granted injunction restrain the levy on The ground
thai the claim had been sustained by fraud the
Sdsyt on the motion stated tha sub:cqoenty trial lie
had found wi,neses to prove that said attorney hsd sworn
10 Gay judge Roosevelt arguments counsel ia rA
tso. be would psy he jsGou, sual not
v,ned Only hr Tovrscnds counsel wa; and The am
law rODt in question j. will be seq i. whether when case
70 be Of opinion IN Ike this two only
new TIL IN the Court where the tried on the ground
M evidence and tho oher 10 To Indie. the
fall. witness perjury snd bis conviction to that
.v Trial be had around IL med 70 doubt wheeler
TIE after could be brought BY ton inr lruarT
Of witness stitne cnud tue sense sca au
toi1c,. Court of Equity .de judtuent in this
Tho owber laty decided by hselt was on diff ren
pripcpo Th judgment against cestgi Hst was set
aide because obtained through coluson of the Ts.ec The
udge the papers and ounod the until tomorrow
vb.u the the Empire Co will be heard senNty
esq Sir Townsend; aud Be Crsm Cornell aud TowI'
send for me Empire Company
Before Judge CLEpkE.
DECISION.
U.,lfr - ,l sgt New-Yofk Balsnce Desk Co.