New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-05-09
TESTIaONY or JHE REV. DIR. VIM. -.
SN(lIIl,E 49,

TESIlaONY OF JHE REV. DIR WIN. u. +.
SNODGRASS.
q Sou a.. . crrrr ulsr by pr'.t"ssiOn 4. an
q ". re yo- prc-eut cideDoe a. AZ Goshen. WANG
q Gov 6,ruriy oaioi,.e3 d-rrymsp in this cry
q Of tie Dutch Reformed Chupa' 4 NO. SIR the Pres
O. Do vow know the d.fnaant 4 har- known h'' 'nf'
lsii OF 49, sm not ocrtain Vhich ,..,..., n,
A. And h,r family a. le'. SIR sd bee anne "'' u
y vou tson IN the .ae bou.e aod nj the same t.S'
h her on any OCCASION A. Ye s 10. oec bs. S s,'
The 18Th Of December Last va al Der h' 49, b az -
III Cour'-WLat time1 A. arTi'eo At "o' nous" Oh ''o
18th a. December. m. 49,. -, e,.l. $500
~ Ia on Monday T, e'dsJ was not iaier than Tues
d'I at,c bTess is,. snr vii, there A did Sir
o. Tor about how Ion, think she returned On tas
I.pT'ns D y.,nTn 70 Bond stree, for her. A. No Sir
vent home end she followed THURSDAY went home
8syr Won noticed whether she wa, LEFT h.nd.ai A.
never did Sir noed anything relation tOtSa, At al
he'd done so would you -E.d you opportunities
70 notice that A. think had opportunities but did
not notice; that is al | can say about ii.
O. In December last when you visited the defendant
your wife dd gou Sgns any pat Of the time that you were
O Did you Dr. Burde and the defendant together a
The Court-How often did you them together A..
think three times Sir an not very confident about it,
O. Whom you them together, did you hear them con
Q. N snanner friendly. Or
mr. HsWS R9P. to aT'r %5, . S. .. to a nat
and decided.
In CliutOn-NOte
O Did YOU har sny or in the degree
lie .nsusse bctw cen them tQuestiou ruled out.
O. Did you Obserye anything quarre'ome in their language
q What was the deneanor Of each TO the otherl A. Oh
served nothing thst attracted my attention - being different
from what might be expected in the relations isuppOsed them
TO sustain 20 each other.
Mr. Cinou-I will repeat again the question TO asoeais
Whist the ,v'nes. What was their demeanor each to
other a. Not inconsistent with the oircumssnce OF her
tng tenant Of Dr. Burdes and be residing IN the same
O. What was the last occasion which you them to
gther' A. On MOndSy morning far a. recoeet about
O. State The which tanspred when they
is s Of Dr. B9 f S VII s, sHd myself To no
siona business for my wife. .,,..-.,
hsd the sS R % Dr. a Bu Sh s nred%e.
herl A. No, Sir not that know Of ~
O. State any conversation which you recolect when they
together that occasion A do not think could
peat sentence correctly uttered by party twas general
Of voTs that Dr. Barde was about Perform and which be
came the occasion OF my wife te,nsns WHEN went nome
Of such general nature that could not pepea one sen
O. Ha. the defendant visited your house? A. Yes Sir.
O. At Goshen A Yes, Sir.
thnk bs, about year. ago. very short time after
my mOva to Goshen she spent some two OF three days in oar
O. Do you know how your reside in the defend
Mr. Hall objected He conendsi thai sufficient that
Mr. Clinton want know whether it ws. by consent Of
M HSlI-We don't want to try ali.l relations
Question ruled out.
TESTIMONY OF nR. CALM.
The hext witness was Samuel ii. Catlin who tcsti-
fled a. follows:
Q. wher. do you reside A. In Brooklyn;
Q. Do you know the defendant A. do, Sir.
O. For how long have you known her? A. For6ve yesr.
g. iiavs you been her family ply stefan a. Wa. while
That wa. during the e time of her former husband A.
Durirg the lifetime Of Mr. Cunningham -
O. You were his physician at the time OF ne deata A.
VIII Won be kind enough to state whether The defendan,
A. Three years ago tnkabcu three years sso-she had the
sSs,n he, K 'sSas di. 0, e bu.
particularly the right aud 'he elbow and hand-the joints
@ What effect upon the joints of her hand
The Joints Of her hand were much swollen and enlarged
O. How are those joints still affected they effected A
o. Have they recovered? A. No Sir not to their nsura
condition . -.
neced with her hands still afflicted Fhe, ere still en-
lEs,d 49,
18th reference to the right hand A The joints enlarged
Of the hseds arms A. should think would sren them
aud sl.o weaken them somewhat.
afflicted with that ines. A. I should LAY not
q Would her strength be TO very small great
diminished by that caus-whs, your med judgment
pou tat should say that the strength OF the joints
q. Very much diminished! A. Somewhat.
CroSS-6Lam1nof'on cond"cfcd ny Mr.. Ed'cdrds
Cunningham family A think about year, ago.
O. When was the last time you attended her professionally
AID then Il, me what il for A. don't know that AZ
tended her proi sonuy after she lett Brooklyn her
several times qer that matter OF interest," examined hcI
@ Were they all these in the they
when you attended her Occasionally A. Not IS much
@ How recently have you examined her hand A. Within
O. State whsther vour examination Of her hand within the
three weeks had ayihns do with the medical opinion
in your direct eAainnsiio Az to the dsnn"n OF
Judge Drsn would like have Dr. Catlin pon, the
stuation Of her hand to the Jury.
1.-THE prisoner here arose and the wnes. indicated the
diton Of her hand as to the part- aHectcdi
seve recollection whether she rings ALL Dc
not know that ever noticed any on her hands -,
O. In OF rheumatism the fingers generally swell!
O. Her fingers were generally swollen a, that timo1 She
could not have rings during all the time she suffering
under this inaammatory rheumatism,
now they Of remarkable 1e they adapted the
prisoners hand in its natural s1e Tht Witness after
mns the prisoners hand should they Of ordinary
O Her Eager. their ordinsr, shape In the condition
q How much they olen from their
The to9I'LAIe thry swollen nov A ths, are swollen
nom their natural -izefrom what they previous 70
the attack Of rheumatism.
considerable extent now but thcy enlarged say
exsetiy how much
swollen the ngcrswhe,heI the joints are affected
than fingers below them A. think stated that the
Gr gers joined with the hand.
TESTIMONY OF MR.. PIERREPONT.
Mr.. Edwards PeTepont was the next witness sworn.
y You are lawyer residing in this city A. Yes, Sir.
q. Your Office. believe is in Wall street A. Yes, Sir
.. Did you know DR.. BuTdel in hi. lifetime A did
. Have you the defendant A. Never. unless hi.
morning
q judgment has been spoken of here which pupos
have been assigned by The deiendantsste
~heb, the deiendsn, bad tina, assignment
The Cou!-That very fully appears by the affidavit Of Dr.
Budc which Is In evidence understand distinctly that she
bad no interest Ia il whsteyrr
AT Chuonrhe object of the proof this 1t has
that the defendant was charged with stealing We hold
that she had interest in that never had being
matter Of tJrIn, and wish 10 show that,
The Court think thar Jury will remember that that