New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-06-13
COURT -GjF GENERAL SESs1CES-JNE is.-Before Re
rqtsier SMfrH


rer DENNY oS'cAsF-1 VERDICT ? GUILTY.
-,-cmpty at the h,sir announced co. opening the
dwn tbit6er 90 istess the exrcs ,tion of hearing
~. losing addresses to'tae Jury in this ease.
n to remark reported To hevt zen made by him
Of he m sTR e SeF dund II II pe he did not
efer Tegul exporters but to vol Ulcers who had fur
chny. asa md WIN had 10 interest
defaning him and /. persee ting hnte Destruction;
policeman who present At tn occasion Of the FIRE and vas
on duty tina night ,ld he ' Deniny into custody
she hsS neitheI-'ioes nor stocth,s. ~. .,..
the k window Of the premis rt' them after the fire. e
could not desrify III, rIerson. -.
10 tbecharso,er Of the defen hart They pronounced good
Thee had him respe tvc for the past II and seheen
Bqsd hea comm need summing up the case t: tn.
rrditsbe of inn essyenes. ingenuity and ability
&c began by saying he hal no apologies TO make for the con-
sessona experience sd se1ed complaints about vast
ing important cr nina till he had becerne slck
belonged this involving
as IL Of spd DEATH made deserving the
0Seti. VIZ n &r nSe had no censufes or psregyrc
pono1ct IN relation time But he eved not the
on t,s other had manifested this subject Mr.
,hespecc whence in the case During this rather
lengthy ahtsoducon he commented with an extraordinary
and pre- relations Of his Cause He spoke with phatic
deron Of the practical criminal Justice
y manifested but public JuEgenaut Of saugh
teysuird his ceh one OF hated ca-e mere lrlsh
u the eS3onoe DISCUSSED it with remarkable degree of
ren advanced several points that bore pausoy and iorG
INTO al Sine facts evidence He attacked especially the
yitnes Reed and the two Bakers with unsparns and re-
rerni themseves-ss fasfers-as liars under the solemn
Tn. counsel defendant occupied three hours and half
included with general exhoaton to the jury not to
Sf tn Psrties to this trial opinion cans
shoa Tecoiec tfst while Mansfield had adorned the bench
q dreys had disgreced IT, ,,o.si h 1 Co. d.. ,,,.o
cpso spoke about hour and half with considerable
and energy He d there S %s two %sy ar
Juybo'i and the other the address the audience in the
He would follow the example Of the defense in
,reEenp outside this and here he cited well known
to he Court end never to tTesp.'s ~snto5 upon the time
the Jsy In 1epy to the tsunt OF Mr. Busteed that the
X Hal said be happened have engagement. at that time
which led him elsewhere and Therefore ae went out de
quite thoroughly the counsel for the defense who
The ecdrdT then rose and began charge the Jury He
fore theI A. thai hs rme was classified among
could be sonnto in CIVILIZED society ana tnat tn me OF he
oeeded the legal definition of the crime of He said
dweii1s in The night time Inhabited by human
being q apparel to this Jury that day had dawned before
Oond degree If they found that the dwelling in question was
attempt pepeate som and they found in
th day or night time Il would be in the first second degree
siute the actual commission Cf e eeat fact for the
That the firing committed not disputed The question
was who did The jury must first seek for motive for the
crime They Ts ask heI uselves WIN the motivef
Then they must ask themselves whether the eTson ON whom
suspicion rested had the Opportuni ty to commit it,
The Recorder the facts the
evidence but declined going into them mnueiy the
Sci both sides had fully resented them The Court
the question before them I'D that 1t their
duty be guided exclusively by the evidence before hem
r6rdess what
quenes He concluded his charge minutes past when
Mr. Busted and asked the Court % charge uon certain
points which handed 20 he II did charge upon
OF
extended list exceptions the Records rs general charge
At 81 O'Clock Jury took the retired Tor debea
toR. At 10 minutes TO they returned and snnonced that
they had agreed upon verdict They foun verdc. q ULTY
SECOND DEGREE with tecommer cation TO
-
After the of this verdict DIR Hal rose aud
moved for judgment forthwith
Mr. Buseed opposed this molten, with 9unet motion OF
suspension of Judgment for divers ssgnedly him.
them, the chief was, 10 settle bill Of eX ceptione
The Court granted the motion of the District Attorney and
decided pronounce with the that
IL would request the Sheriff retain him till bill Ct
cepion could be settled.
The prisoner then brought the bsr for enteLee and
asked he had anything to why the judgment OF the law
should not be pronounced when he made
observations.
The Court proceeded pass sentence and after
lowest the law would allow and that or term
Of 10 years In the State Prison.
The Court accordingly sentenced him fo the Of zen
years TO hard labor, in the State Prison.
Adjourned 10 ii O'Clock tomorrow morning.
COURT CALENDAR-FoR MONDAY June IS.
Court OF COMMON PLEAs-Part Mos Ia TO