New-York daily tribune., 1857-10-24

hN "A y
tatrsy 'hrt BE- Ee rist;s oid.nt to that cS.rct.r l.
>. or rr,oe tts poiLt Wh,her th-y wee rrtero
es ,h,, vhst he skrd ard 81 he .sQpiuz 70
u,r, ,c BE- c. nd Squire and Il fooEs that the general
,s,rf posed The per'u of rou-dv ua1rr
.,srte ard Etns, hi. hsvins su',hn. DO bo'k
Sc. % r sS1 TIT 5ei. ss,. . e.. 10 'q
t - - Win such ooutro We, tho.. -. =. a.
b, yr.ue ~ aid spt'le and other OF sre,er
Lsd G.d bat be rss .uch otieer aud OF
.ilo, d.cdLs or rquiIns shs. tho.- rights wrre h.i o,
def,d the cc-f to oduo' IN the; gight give To him th
power Of .xerps thcse rsh' haever they ht BE-
Tia, be afst,rc, COur,ope had r.tt or o,her to
h.ht sp"I po':e.os' use or control Of tneG nos
conn epced only shie the sht' Of the cre terminated
A. to if- rgbt. WIZ 70. oe' was tePTs'ensed
there, As s o;hr nights have sny) they eGtlrey
veto bose " G ofe 'na shsra no iFodud tar .n
interrupt he poss..en or Restraint Of the u'e Of them
Tbs bor, ef the legal prcceedin this .ahec. 10 i'm.
rortant this et for Al junction aud receiver
Tie poceedi before vel tive TO the possession 81 tee
Jun. .nd on h Of July asei.iGn made that he
rs. Conm and entitled to the books a'd e'P.I'
snp.rns Court s,ap,t Conover ana Os.ned ia
o. M h % s, ss,d S inS noo ssa
dissolved On the 10th Of July eeTtiorari rs' obtained e.
rsi s -t. ~ shss a.. esedd Ve1' ser alignment
On the 4th OF July resolution was pending before the
Bosd o Couucn deliver the books al papers into the
po. . poratiou Counsel sud nstiuci him allow
De,I them apparently tended 70 defeat Pr Sesd
Lcrp racn rroeured pdy INJUNCTION restraining the
pssas- Of the resolution and also restraining any act to defeat
On the lstb Of jay in the Common Pleas com.
E.n.d By the 5 ssSs asa S SasS 5nav a he
cour.eors attornsys and ssen.s from receiving IN
vita Le and Dtvhn om delivering them to him A. th.
tiue Of the service Of the inurc-on nover the wraht
Of ap of or .ot ..rvic. and he pr cced,d bring oefu
certain Of the books ater me OF n .stn For
IN, time the Court sf er soeIn e'simer de'
dd to ne injunction inn & Ind Tg.s :. lii tn.
Coumor Pe slesns the service Of the original co mp ast
s,,I Of some Of them by my order Mr Fieds advice 20
disregard the Injunction Conover' entry mo the sp,pent
paper. ard alleging that the pro"e'dnss before IN. re
jurisdiction and Pains for an INJUNCTION al,a' f.
a. .Ntrwsrd OF asumsn dissolve: Mr. field, tut
'1Ssd d ,s IL to %
above on the lita Of Ju adding
"a. epced Jry a; that that tiue bad issued
ysrn u. statutory PrPceedDs .Sa tsA ade S On, 20, ct
iurber proceedings prevrned BY the tho
CITY Desiu and that f,nf sPpteheuded that The. would
p,to proceeding, and d.mauiDG Judgment tnst the
H'ht Sc teen,ee .nd he tnc.eo .Goyea &
them: and an nuoction against tue city and
b py i G. ite' S ard oG doa snyhns prevent their
d.,ery Cono,er .he execution OF the warrant except
junction sgars, Bertho and Far nstou etranng them fon
t,vrr tie any except pur.asn TO the
c,Lse wb, oil rju ssstd should MT be granted aud
receiver sp? ined aid temporary Injunction was ao@edin
Toere va. also sut commences in The Supreme Court By
Copover s,sir't 'he cry snd ne'n 'nd nr se.rn stating
cee,ou thereon tbe s'uine otLe wmr.s the naouty
bin ri. sp.tmI,s by ce th Po..es,ion by Devn of
o.sin tes Tor with the city TIE appointments 70
IN this CoorI on JnJ the suit by the City in th-
Pas br sn July end the prcceedns the'eia
itdo ant tha1
IL Cos Pleas sheriff Be enn"3 from
e.srps Ts. 1se, aso sn1, mis- ot to thu
Office should be- estahl'sh,d d On quo ray'dnfo
10 that suit s. oder made that Defendants show
cause should Dot su- AID ,eceiver b.
rtsd and tenporsr, injunction was allowed in the mean
On the orders show just mentioned motion Is
mad the njrno ion pss'd Tor 10 the complaints aud for
Tt. .,y stnttirg bh stol conne the litigation
~ ,ds ' a,, 10 The TIE % ct.ihi. and bp oa"n Pies.
have the quesoos dfrFrntiy aud are diane
vi, p,e, 'G IN the .u b. the CITY scsu.t Couover m
ut1e.d Jurs r. Dissolved injunction g"unt' aop"ently
H. .,,s r. .,,et I. Tepc,tes p Abbott ri and hs
C nmon Plea. Ju6ae Inrshan Prt'd ts in so opnou OF
RE s,, - uhcr decs proceed differ bat little If
oil srd hst % If either way III tn" direction opposite
rhr he eocion, sno oPiors To ooe before
M justice Roosev,: did MT originally, s.Aemeut
of statutory pr hich s 'he time the
# TIE motion ss' couTsrc'o before hm ipcomp'.se
The ude II the Common Pleas dd cor n 'tement Of
Lo. IN Ss e, ud sn led sa to a be books
ard psp. But both them t. ct those proceed
oi resretiv,y and ne cases not ,hius even
tbi, reject ot-iopy different The d-cbion IN this Cont
suu ept OF in ths, Court sppess believe fon the
cpnioI tny authority but as establishing by adJat
,a snd Junction solemn argument dissolved aud de-
ritd s Ctut sub,equently saned and on ise sol
.p Argument, tned within fifty days sfterward IN that
Court
Eere sr the deci,cn, Of two directly in conflict
iqury W. rot reviewing ithr of io.e deci'
out 70 el gre" tftepee at sfsro,'sr1 such task a
that dry me is matter OF most hearty
The two Courts stating the pon have taken
ppo, eir,con: CtLer Of 9r%n a. eaG.S stta
ourt. hove ia the "f this ssti re 2esedy
Tut ID toI Il the of ddereLce Of opinion h not
The irssIce hsy. sivru sh0ss he inpr
matters INDEED eyieene- u, All OF such i,rt seems
hardly for 1t is within thu observation OF suot ty
e'y hs the comp lcaed sno 'eied que'tou %.'ch
t- in,esgsior ~ Cours OF Justice tsrd TIM Is
o.uNp, enbc'd 10 tbs. cass Courts se lnd'sidu. 1oes
offer ireqo.ty Every di'ssnS OF mem, ,e OF CouI
tn opiIion e bis tre'hf,p aid svey revrs. oy an a
ps- Co1rt of tbe decision Of its inferior are in.n 80 o. on
freIcv a. juecs orirn on exscty re sane m'ls n
tt rds neither OF tnese cases OF nefrnne
Is OF rare oecuelee Both on the contrary se very c"
Tou
The pursuing opposite courses Ct decision 1t
I. s-.ty desrsbe that the isaon In one should oe 'us
g-ud,o sud hs wtol contOy,r eoneT ed q s eoJSas .
ths ether II ths ce.irsbe ~ Is ncP-hs,oe 20
ressoI Abe orderly sId decoos sdminht e''oh vi Ju'
witch Courr it stal b. coruC.dl and when tha' n dcne
tew .h.l tie decision te enforced! A"umirs tan p.'o
i.dcou extenr, snd cen cm'set
iusc- with esnsl facility and b-oht the rule tha 'ne C1
ht having ,oEzstce ~ the sreect ,ash 'etsn i sun -
The setin wholly te seems 20 be propetJ spP'y
II perfectly free from oeiUc cors'tett WIZ sns
the e. ice.e respect ard the amp est H"I
fT 'h. osLT tribunal IL the De 10
il tie situtior Il tos Coait' Why one more "
l~i,nt under az crrlo.-tsneet sx.trg or Hkey %
bo, 'f tcis cnutr very sno ooncoc " az
'tsi he ,it-r pioy II sequtnt possession OF ,ne
~hh p1Ofr-y hr allowed ?" e'tsruinsit H. o =, ,b.
ln' .c,ctIJ po~ri. th-r slrely De no oor -
CN1r ,ueceetirg 81 does q al the posrrs OF "s -;
Kings b-rrh sId t.vis tve'y suhJ-c .e -,
sta. C. lr the ttest common sA yus, -, ,bs