New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-03-10


- 'te 10 wien he place hn sef unde- II 10 Pre-
.s'srel
IL, : Sc Of --ouf srd r no- Ar ,1niod by
! O. u.u.n IN TIE one prnh BITS - ,ve-T to- other
aor '-t II BE- hen doe by ne sIe-cI:- ~ test
! -y,'t's- p"ser ~hi up, e'ia.us - --ch ". z-e
b. nd 10 issp+ct he ios'itlou- o. es,- a. emau4ns
| f. n tie voluntary ar'i1n q the PcNpe Have tn
p.Sp Cffi'htTa -i.tt % c.s'ufb the r-i4 o. ne
otter E-fh S'sif r,.'s 90 49, b4.i. q ia owu
-Cvere eLts n te0'cc bg re c. st'Hu,a oar aim
b.. ten foundation OF cdr Pru-periy aud TAI 'oal
! shry. ShEI we lot .5rr ID An1 nii IA The
ono b. . mp n. the e;.l rights u each
| STATE
ia citizen Of + - Sa-a hal en,ce - ens5'e
sly, ~ cape ron 't- ae-vie " HI. mi.te-. t1e laF
lcs IN uonsDle II = r ne loss u 'Le slave.
b. h l. hatle r. b. Lnic - -.c Glei f. the 70 ID
! n sror. AZ an .Nltd h-rt - ~ t1a' nave
reyg f'uuG jug IN tn tour Ntetes Fncn c'us0 US
ny circuit, which hive not sustained tls Ia where
tre evl.euce REQ rcd them ~ su-t=in - And 10 I.
! p-cttr ina; s7ould Ala say TIA more sss- have
wien n ny circuit BY Of IT,. eX'cut sod 10 ~
fy, than IL ell -iheT Drrie of toe Jd.oI i.l' das
q done ioyirG cat - -oce'eigu r-7ts Of N nth
Ss'es and protect the eg iuter-s Of our breth-
/ Ieu OF The Sob
1t the-. "a =. bo oo,trsted with the case uos be.
fore h Cont. limos he declared 10 the most sDe m
sIo in pee rrn that ths shall b. neither slavery
rC- iDvnuI 's'y serviuda IN 'hst STATE sn4 ma an
siave brought into IT, with view of bee oming RESI-
cen, sba be fmaucp,ed. Aud efiecth has bsen given
70 bis DIVISION of the Constitution by the de ,A N o.
the Su.reue CCuit o that ate " a fall kn0 Tledge
c ttese acts slave /. br ght from Missouri TO Rock
lssGd il the Stole OF Illinois, and IL ret Nued there ~
slave fer two years and then take - FOIt S1eog,
v ere Slavery i hlciied 10y the Missouri CoDpro-
misc Act az ihec he i Tctsr ed longer 10
.fate e Saytry Hsirie-. h,s si'e was also kept st
L.. ssue place 'Our years slave. having been pur
ctssec n Missouri. They were then removed 70 the
Ss'e 4 Missouri sDd sold a. slaves and in the action
he'CH they are not only claei as slaves, u ma
iuty Of Nv brethren have held ID & Un tneir being
tuLto to Missouri tne statue Of Slavery attached TO
ITEM
,ti e, 10 -, 4-:,i .ba-
due Ia the State Of ltno-. Having the 'ams rg1ts
of severe Rh'y the SAFE Of Ms.our in adopting
C,nrt Ution, can perceive no reason Why The 1os1
toIs C Ill or should not receive the zane considerA
ton as those of Missouri. AID wing TO my brethren
The light r Judgment thlt exercise my.eif,
must be permitted say that II ns 70 me the Prn
CIR laid will enable the people OF S1Fe S'f'e
10 tro6uce slavery IntJ Free State for longer or
sh1,ter tine R-y suit the,r cpngcniencei aud by
ret the slave the state wbesc, he Tas brought
by force or otherwise the status " Slavery aacues,
and protects the rights of lie master, and de les the
sovereeniy Of the Free State. There is DO evidence
brfIe us that Drcd Scott and his ismly retained 10
Mi-soun voluntarily Inc contrary IS intersoe from
tie agreed case: " Ia the yeAr 1885, Dr. nerson re-
uCyed the paiGtf and said Harriet and their
cnushier Eliza from Fort Sneling to tue state OF
Hi.sCuri, wtere hey have ever since ie.lded ths
l. the agreed case and can it he uttered from tbsthat
scott AID family reoLrnei 10 MssOud yolu1iarly
lie wss we'd; which SHOWS that he va passive,
a. n .laVe ing exercised vOitipn on the subject
lie OiG IOt ist the or ny aoscOn1iug or IOfce
Eur that wa not sufficient to bling him within l. I'd
Stowells decision; he NUT have acted voluntarily
Il would be n0csefy of IL" ard an outrage on ms
rights 10 his return ana then claim toa was
vouutsry sDd that ground thai bis former status OF
Slavery attached.
If The oecisi Il he placed IN this ground it is fact
fr jury t. decCe wletber teIe'urn vas Nouhtaryi
or che tie fact should be dl.tn.y admitted. pre-
suu pt sgsirst the p1inrf 10 this respcc, say With
cor fdepce OF authorized from the Ia 10 admitted
10 coming 10 the conclusion that voluntary eturn
by Grace to her former dOmoll Slavery alta ,hed Lbid
q. l. 70 hot . "a
Slavery upou her colonies snd that was malnt4ne1
10y NUMEROUS acts OF Parliament end pubic policy,
al II short that the sy-ten at Slavery was not oay
es'abr ed by Grtat BIltslG IN her West Indian colo.
ies but that IT popular and prof able To many OF
the We Jthy aUc Influential people OF EnSand who
wee tpgegel II lGade 81 "Fntd ard cu'tl'seh plants
Il, IL il = t lorl,s. Moor can read ms aD1rtts
views and rot be struck win the great citeren BE-;
tseef f. GLAND aud her colonies and the Free ana
Slave Sta'es OF this ULioD. While Slavery "a .se
CO., ri,s e T. glsnd IL subject 10 the po'et Vi 'ac
II otter Country, States 'ciaiiy IN iesaro 10
S!svty ore Independent resting upon theh own
sovtreigntes and SUBJECT 0ulyt 10 lhterhsuona' lows
wi cb apply 10 independent STAGE
H. the case of Williams, who wa slave IN Ufahait
b,vinc mn away csme 10 England Lord StoSeI ssri:
"Tte tour Judges all concur ia this-that he vas
slaye io Grsuads though free ms0 IN Englan1 an1
he youd have continued free man IN ali other psr's
OF TIE world excepting Gransds . -
Strod4rv Graham 10 llo.ad aud - Is C1cts
35 bAs been cited "a having direct bsaung IN t1e
Gaze before VA. 10 that case tue Court say: IL was
,xclufiveiy In The Pc OF Kentucky 70 determine Tor
iu.lf whether the employment of slaves IN auother
State should should DOT make them ir.e on her re
turn" No ques ion was before the Court IN that case
,Nce II that OF urrclctOn. Aod sny opinion given on
arv other point is arbur dicu and OF no Authority
In the conc usion Of biz opinion the Chief justice sad
ain every view of the subject, therefore, tna Court
has no jurisdiction OF the case, and the WIN OF eHol
nust on that ground be dlemsse d. - .
In n csse of Spencer negro Dennis Cllls Rep
32 the Court say OoCe free aud al Ways iree ls tue
MAXIM OF Mary land lsw upon the subject. Freedom
| I. hxf a.
snd tie LIBERATED slave, nor by any condition Sub-e'
qu,1t attached by he mater TO the gin OF freedom,
can a state Of slavery be reproduced
In Hunter VS.. Butcher Leigh, E2:
"Bv statute Of Msryspd Of l7o al slaves brought into
Tbs. s 10 reside se declared Tree Vguian born slave i.
carried by ii, the aer settled there ,Gd
force oil the then be brn" him slave % virginia and
,ssn.i The purchaser, that he is free
JUG &c Kerr III the case says:
Agreeing DO with The genera view taken 10 this case
max TIE exsct extent 10 which mean % 40 The law
Of Maryland having enacted that slave carried into that state
having carried him MAyud ard yalun,AFy submitting him
self the slave 10 that la~ It governs the ca'e
In every decision OF slave prior TO that Of
bred Scott VS. Emerson, the Suprens Court OF Mis-,
soui considered il turning upon the Constitution OF
Illinois the Ordinance of 1S or the Missouri Compio-
mise Act Of 1920. The Court trested these acts "a ia
force ard held itself bound TO execute them, by de
csrng the slave to be free who had acquired domici
| urcer them with the consent OF bus master.
TIE late decision reversed this whole line OF adj udl'
cation and held that neither the Constitution and LAYS
Of the States acs OF Congress in relation TO Terri
tories could be judicialy noticed by the Supre n.
Count of Missouri. This il believed to be in confc.
with the decisions OF all the Courts in the Southern
| States with some exceptions OF recent cA4es.
In Mare Louise We. Morat et al e Loui'ians Rep.
49, il was held where a slave having been taken TO
the kingdom Of France other country by the owner
where Slavery is not tolerated, operates on the con-
dition of the ssye and produces immediate emanclP.
| - laaao r,as no ms