Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-01-06
NOTICE.
- ~ : @@-41@ NOTICE. = & T9dEta
Talliaferro, and others, 0omplaia,.ants,
Patrick, and others, DefsndGnts., {.

Talliaferro, and others, 0omplainants,
Patrick, and others, Defendants: r.
-! IL/<<IN CHAECERY. 4:EAlgf rs
ITO Alexander G.. Taliaferro and Agnes
X his wife, William Marshall, Mary NJ
Archer. Fielding L. Marshall, James F
Jones and Ann L., his wife, John T
Smith and Margaiet L., his wife, Thomas
Marshall, Eliza Marshall. Robert L. lDou.
that and Mary A, his wife. Mildred p
Marshall, Jacqueline A.. Marshall, Elliot
NJ. Braxton and Ann NJ, his wife, Ellen
MN arshall, Jacqueline B. HOWE, Mary
HOWE" Ellen Howie, Anderson Wade and
Susan, his wife, w. NJ. Howie. Ann How.
Ii, Jno. Marshall, A. A.. Marshall, Jas. e
Marshall, Fielding Douthat and MaryW.
his wife, Jas. K.fMarshall, Edw. G. Mar
shall, Jannet X. Harrison, Geo. d. Fisher
Lucy NJ. Norton, Edw. c.. Fisher, N. Q
Kenney and Mary A., his wife, Mary
Fisher, Raleigh Colston. Ann F. Colston
james G, Paxton. Jas. w. Massie, D. j
Jordan, Samuel F. Jordan. George Fish.
er surviving executor of E. j.. Canning,
ton. dec George F. Harrison, Edward
J. Harrison; Carter H. Harrison and
Henry Harrison plaintiffs and Spicel
Patrick and Virginia his wife, Aaron
Stockton, William Tompkihs, Joel Shrews
bury, William Dickinson, Samue! Steele,
Robert c. Steele, John Alexander, NSam:
iel Alexander, Susan C. Thornton, Am
NJ. Wilson, Barbara Wilson, Sally VIII;
sen, Ann G.. Marshall, - Marshall
Emily HOWE, Mary Fisher, Lucy G
Fisher, Susan L. CoIston, William S
Wilson, Betty A. Fhzhugh, Mary A,
Harrison, M1rgaret /. MARSHALL, Fanny
Marshall and John Marshall defendants
in the above Cbancery suit; X
Take Notice,
That at the Fall Term 1906. Of the Circuit
Court for Kanawha Co. and State Of Va.
decree was rendered in the above cause
ordering, among other things, a refeKsuce
of said cause to John /. M6sely Esq "a
Special Commissioner for that purpose
appointed, with instructions to repolt up
on the title of the land, mentioned in the
Bill and sought to be divided and rarti.
toned in said cause, embracing the fol-
lowing enquiries, to wit: -
'Flst. Whether the claim Of title, ia
John Steele nineteen thousand five hun
bred acre survey, is correctly stated in the
Bill. 4
end. Whether the several interests q
the present owners Of said tract of land
are correctly asccrtainrd and set out in the
Bill.
Sd. What is the interest Of each OWN
er in the whole tract?
4th. What is the interest Of each own
FER, to whom lot B., is assigned, in said
lot B.
9th. What is the interest of each own
er, to whom lots G.. and E. are assigned,
in said lots G. and E. H.
9Th. And that said Commissioner re-
port any such other and further matter
as to him may seem proper, or any ofthc
parties require"
And take notice, that have fixed upon
Monday the l9th day ofJanuary 1857 as
the timeI and the Office of Parks and
Mosely in the town of Charleston County
of kanawha and state of Virginia, as the
place, for complying with the foregoing
acquisitions of said Decree, atwhich timt
and place any Of. the parties who think
proper may attend. ,&-s
JOHN L. MOSELY. -
Spania1 rnp,a,,i ,Sioonr