New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-08-17

DevEn the Court totk te papers 10 iook Into u
question Of ursdction ard adjourned the hearing to
Tuesday next.
THE STREET COMMISSIONERSHIP.
COSOvER ADJUDGED GUILTY or CONTEMPT
PUNISHMENT SUSPENDED UNTIL MONDAY
THE INJUNCTION CONTINUED.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs-ArG. iS-Bef,rs Judge
NGRAsaS.
The Mayer ke, Of NewYOrk sgt psnl D. cesover q g.
Judge Ipgrshsm rendered twodecisions in the long.
protracted Street Commissioner csse this morning.
on with reference to the Contempt imp1ted to nr.
Corover, and one upon the Injunction hesetofoce
granted. He sdjudges Mr.. Conover guilty. Of co.,
tempt, and continues the Injunction against him and
al the other parties except Mr.. Field. The following
are the decisions Of the Cosrt in full
THE CONTEMPT.
IscsaHAN. r. 1.-THE plsinsis. for s.tachmsne
puscOu issued ca, q this cour, The pl.in. fsd hss
comp'nt originally assn,, Conove wnes aud pe,hs sea
and Wrt from removing o.a.ns be removed
tie SGoi IssS I and ssse, psps, IN IA
from interfering With the same IN any manner OF
Conover or shy person olsimns the came for him The
plant sverred that the property referred to we. the ecoss
Street Ccmmi..iOnar. pepartmeo md are the exclusive prop
trty Of the psnta That D.,Rn h,d been appointed Street
Ct ..cS book: and p.psr. the Street
Office II also sts out the claim Of Concyr 70 the ocs .aS
the proceedings before MI Justice Peabody the time %
ran. for the arrest Of Dsyn and the search vsra, e
Thcs u: 2 ss ss;:n,s 8
Coneyer :nd were conducted Tor the purpose o.
dsely after the warrants signed BY the Jude ts
% W. n.rs,. ON upon sae s'
time the wssn psca in the hand. OF Sps q the dsssa
s S . sHesas f. % So
paper. brought the Stree. Once sd
tb.r
thereafter proceeded 10 the Street oce snd
sion Of the room. where the residue books
Hs s.s '; %s Ae pn that
sed the injunction both causing the portion o, .se e
taking possession and control of the once Tue
bid ss ssds. snd sss
place between the witnesses to the precise .oen
Tss. Sasnsnss doe. not 4 period q NOR.
than three minutes bat was oSn.dsTea o.
the counsel Of Mr. ConoyeI took the warrant aud esvias e
Court Rom i to the ooI'ss. ,h,s r..
ton served until after Mr. Brewer len the Coyr
which from the view easIt.in q tho d.
fendsns conduct happily relieve. me ron n nvnssa
b. Sssn on sS. thu,
sns or sD Sr nd %s disposed
junction served upon Conover In Court stei me i
Of boo Is which he measures were teAea ~
him after the .erve the injunction to prevent ne mCv
ss, be- OoI one .p Of the books Supreme %
S d ces
time the o. Ss % 90
stansS 'G' the second load Of from the
a ssn served ,s s.o S,ds or
he Court with the warrant when was signed ~ yuaSs
the Judge and .f Gsno,si
hs execution ate, the first I.d o. 0Sos s s1y.s Sss
be sST. and f. s;S *. %
p.,ed by hm.e for the delivery Of The books Sy himself
snd subject his control The Judge before whom VS.
sSn counsel and the hs
could hay been BY sT 0el s fss .Sos:
hist he bad entire control the execution OF ne sssn
he .eeond time from the Street Commi.onsf. Otes.
think therefore, the evidence shows clear violation 81 q: "
therefore becomes unnecessary the quesos
the point of time which ush Injunction We
mari the conduct Of the defendant sthoush they CON
S viii r.. III s o n the
known to the counsel for some Days The haste WIN ne"
speed used obtaining the books: remarks the counsel
gard TO In which the books would 30 to
nne.os III. .dsce to IL. officer aobey od. bts.1.s
not p, &, to ss hs
Of action 70 execute be search warrant In evasion o. tsas NJ
Is process. as was his duty both NJ and h counsel
evidently endesvons TO have the warrant execateo ~
ate. after tie oosi rslnsd win books fo. g:
x. s
free from n.S q n vs ssis .S Ssss
Street Cenm'sonsr By the Mayor and Board Of AasInsn.
s ss s Turner
deputy vas shtfniy In possession NJ Conowr enPe.i.S
ISr Ssdi p.pe sh Il. SSty Iesa
From that time the defendant kept the entire control Oh tsS
sSs so: With . q ao As the
the 1Sn'S q. O. ss% q
committed them. can DO difference between this Inter.
which they were .huttus everybody Such "a
regard the property ofndyidus. would trespe.
damages and the law considers such On act 70 be en- inter
ference With sno.hers property 90 to ensrss ne ssess
il Violates order Court which proSsd defedss.
from sny ofp'eence with the books and pspv %
that have hesitation IN coming TO the concuSsa
M b. violated hs Srt r. 2: sSps
sT ;ss suS a% , " '
to these Proceedings tbs. order Of injunction vs. ~
.pa rSh ". The st ssK ~
proper and or!y mode in which an order msde By css
soS be I 10 o fs .es sSsd b a.s ss
I'D b. copy osn,l order made the Court
hs co ses or y udss The p.in,ss @s
ma s ras IL. r..S s
Peop. s stusyspt sdsn ns dssess az ~. oe
cS,Tsd os lip The for M.
defendant. the dsf..d.n; had 70 .h to dSssy
r. nd II IL o. % .sse.S
OF ooecience 70 inc
nd Is DC, for party decide whether such order. snos
houd long the order RENAME Ia efes
Ms duty 70 comply with IT, and when be assumes TO se ~
tdL bee of evs5e M BY causing sots 70 " ~.
10 SCENTS which be pr hlted from d.'nE arssy
o,.S II, .i,btr Gaze pupl.hm-tta Aud fof fhs pnrg
.au.ly imns,eiis wheeler the iprpcon "" gayy n..1
~ rr, No ons IS IL remained IN cr~ b" a|t,n'1n -,
.. ,,foruiz4 a. the order ofthe CO.t r ae 80
"a obey such /. TN l.nsus.e Of isr Ia suiy,
NJ a., Hohein q Edxsrds Oh ,e" Ah' 4. ..
,st Jus.h Paige al the ChsLe IrssJ' A.. ~ 81 80
Let 10 Re ri:,ed to voIste an ~ sat AM s,mss.t
na .,.p h, We, the Court sss the, into oos.d.ss
' ;,i,s the OF ponishinenl Asd Va -
~ a.. sa.isins Psss $50 the Chsnseies ssys II ~
defrsdsut permitted to d1osy ~ ree