New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-08-26

NJ WIZ. .sa I:,..t - =: g:s,s = :s.r
.s sn.i. Is. CS.irsss u +. Commit. S.a.t
streets Alderman Thomas. Br .oaia z. ia rs,.9p e
propossd ssd Alderman Bar a not reeve assA 10 b.
s: intended p .,. bin q; s:nss i;s ;s. .ss .In.s
sr.ley. district and ia; Alderman Bss would a: rpn me,
d. City Hall tim. vas .ppoin,.d and there, md in
uosue:d By Alderman Brill! Ni.rms, sur :, -nop
z a: ::s: =. 2:
tire. to Eve yeas Of the prem.e' thus es:olsa By Wit
' . :s ..a': 4, nd :ssf;
$50 year for h. ga Of the balhs.a TO b pessred oi
ss 1. r q 70, a:
By os ,, 11.9. merely n.y.. md tie
annual eassse thu. speed Alderman Bar. CHEERING
b s h . .Tda s e p
ing least half dozen times that the city nith: - wei Pay
noand i va. not in .ccordsne. via the .T.asemel made
with White and h.; could not epi myself a, p., any
Pecin.d tenn OF y' or for any oer peod OF i,nsi u
than should sonina. the dir IN Ros's'e street,
receive very indefinite aud could no, be sIed on until
Se Eonmon sRa .Da the ne on III. i
| the East River fixed and determined -
1sgas ss i Sih Sl1 Bo
1sd Fer: s snd thu nj Board % %
| men. , -
e. e. AZ. HaSsSs % ss'; VS.: g. pend
ing In reply these objections Alderman Bat stated that
sG III 81 M e
did 10, van. hat il had Co. s COED nd q
@ s; q; E: e ID T..
ssa sG d,n t sa s sS s ss. aPPss s @ y
could tsi with him further about lease but would make no
Sspson Aderm.n Bar fave me- to Ii =. sat
i,fsy arrangement was made he did not think anything
Ihe generations had the. occasions. No
has been eaecutsa and the resolutions; passed ty n.
Committee Wharves, Pies and slips in the Board Of
AT tL time also proposed to M. BY Alderman Ban,
e 4 eahf. RI would agree to sci them hat
price would undertake tina, the city should ssree 70 buy
.% .ns by @5s sf IS@ .od While
should receive but si70 per lot named BY me to him as the
@ do . he % Sa: the t sh.. ,2ss thin.
meaning tbs resolution. on my applications then pending in
the Common CounclhIoush he requested me 70 call upon
selection Of the location for such ensrsn working house: and
sT k.; .pa hs sss it,
ca. ON Mr. Kelly and va. Informed that Aid Barr had
s ns ID. Gs lad h% s' 81
a. such property needed their intention being
sa.ns S The ;s is0a stated Kelly What
Ala Ban and myself and he Ienaiet ;hi
tho. IL ky ssned to enter into .ny Negotiation; for
s Sa and thy dB that s;
could not do that be drive them out of Canal
p s95 rS9S Tis ses y
White a TN. Ss I Barr ssa sna
pestedy called him and stated that unless such al
bsy should psepae In the benefits scfuGs from
contract, in his Department they should stop his supplies aud
Ar The pa,ase Of the by the Board Assistant
Aldermen .I On t. s ,ra e q ssTIs snd ss
Of wharye. Pier. and sps Of "hS Aid Smith
S. e o ina 20 :: 80
l II, boxa 10 ms of
i Fl the: na sn ought 3. :. do
wtH Do wh. right refused to make such
regard the passage OF the resolutions and tue reso
In relation 70 the establishment. of the exterior Inc aud the
application for to n, in above referred TO- after my
1s the By he cO%m9n Council w.s informed
H.. those as ssassnsH applied
him in his contract with me- Tor eqa1ins the
that they had .ad him 1ne. he them each onelId
G R's .w hi Il. %sas filing pas. Bos
o. allow alteration Of the exterior line proposed A.
:1. slSs sp STi Saa uehI 70 Do VIII
Alderman and that they could not share IN any contract that
e.a on 1N VARIOUS 's1s
BY Alderman BOuton th. Alderman Smith hs. reiterated de-
Ts' ted EsSSsSse sih.s :isH
.:ant tIsm.n BeStSn that not les. sum than from 5000
$500 would BELIEVED satisfy AssT%sn smith replied
doing his duty In cOu:eSa.nse these repeated ress
in bis position Alderman, endesvered to smbsass my
upon the property and to impose bahen, upon
s. sGn FL eseInsa es u. sGA a :.
and through portion! where .d been re.
fused not given to FIJI aud make up the property
% si
Lee Kuspp The OF SHEPHERD Knapp at the Joint pen.e Of
the Grant such y expressly. tie
grantees should be at 81 e. for @ &C
g9a 5 sa. h s.a: q sid y had
IS {ufoy h.
tpbrd Knapp that he had applied Alderman Smith early
the So Of to for the
scmmOd.on Of he ferry .3S,e ,ssTsd red, Upon 'ash
would him upon the subject with whom 4 would be
To nhs and tn H. Kn.S Sn
he Knapp explained bic views and wi'he, in ri.:ion TO
ne ne h,n, .nythai Of the rs:oacn Knapp called
upon Smith know why had not been offered and
Ba.Isy Bty would .s,n sa upon him. when ls
and Mr. Knapp again explained I ~ MIN a his s. sw and
Alderman smith was again sought and the s 'e; s. tF
: .dsm.n Smith did not ' unds.tsnd from Hdendsi
Biisey that all had been made right in the eonf-
E. @.Ss e. the s Hs ssS
ut, hid sS e.. W. :: %.de . iS the
resolution Of offered that he sir knapp although he
SsS What wa. s:H. s n
updetand to Ie.n snsaDs s' sD Ne sns 1 nss
:'Sld nc About middle Of psGenh. lS tas Iso:Sn
such piers WAS ;sS s1 q @ns. I
Cmmou Council viii how passed by the Board Of Aldermen,
s-nt 10 the Board Of Assistants referred 10 their Committee
Wbmyes Piers and Slips who subsequently, unanimously
pr,ed against the same which 1t was sdoP'ed
fy The Board Of Assistants and the following day approved BY
tie Mayor sce when have been informed by M Knapp
tbst be found impossible to get the resolution through
mill be had all right was also informed by George
w Rbet that Mr. Knapp bad informed him that ne was
ned 10 paw consideration for the passage Of the resolution
F. whom be raid Mr. Rblet did subsequently
the Sst January 1885, served upon the Street
ri,,en remembrance against building OF the said pierre
snbeouert 10 my remembrance proceedings nave been
tak,p toward the building Of those piers: g.
In relation alteration Of the exterior me csfoe re-