St. Mary's beacon. [volume] (Leonard Town, Md.) 1845-1863, 1857-01-22

r. - 80 - - - <fss-&9ss szsss
5. .szs9 ss.gs asAs Zee
s 60 ssss - ...s.-.-
f'rsn, H. sls<...vt...;... !.
) Z y ]. Set lsD I'D 9aE 50
j. s.. !. 4; - !, y. :,
: 90 = sAslff 4 7. e;;is =
ks,nsoIaispn. tbe hlsek rupub Jeans ! evess
Msslt glowing nside to The 1unanimos,.
- u New England s0r Esfpmnue. fsD0k.
Ing At The history &C the past. swe are ms
chped % consider the eiianIm0sss iopDos
sitiUn pF that regioh Of t.odntfy to Mr..
Bnchsnan.s election i, happy omen
OF succrssful and brilliant 'adminis,ra.
llons because, .two Of the greatest and
beslaPresidenis fhe Union has ever had
were elecGed under similar acircumstau.
ces. iEs taIg ~ az,sJas -gaI alk ffsa4.H
10 1876. when Jefferson and Adams
were rival candidates Tor the ptesElenc,
The latter received the unanimous vote
OF New England. and ia 1900 the entire
electoral vote Of New England was casi
against Thomas Jefferson.., I, All OF, New
England, except Vermont, voted against
James Madison in 1919 as well as IN 1S.
10. The whole ofthe electoral vote of
New EEgla"d was sgaiE thrown against
Andrew Jackson 10 1924, and when he
was Erst elected in 1873 il was against
the united opposition Of New England
wI'h the exception Of one Of The nine
e'ectora3 v0ssssof siaine. fAt lsis7sec0nd
election in 1892 all Nrw England. ex.
cePt Naine and New Hsmp>hife, voted
against him. Z. '9st5 - a.''s saw
Twice did New. EDgland record ! !
unanimous sote sgai,sct Thomas eJefFeF,
500. and twice o asnnanimsus vote against
andrew Jacksons tmith the excppt,crs
stated above! Ahe has now done the
same with IaInes eBnchanafS. II IS 4
common thing with the Black feruhiicans
of this eraFic Paint 10 Thomas Jefi: rson
as an. endorser Of their creed, swhirh is
amaze Of characteristic audacitx -
pasis sshecanse he was lnoa
uneqnivocally. cs-~
- sassss ttai.f< strclilt C0fiftY8 z
sbsursi8ty OF thsfS-A Au.,,,es 07S5hE -
that the same New Englsa-,
iy, welded to. black republicapls.a,-,,-
in 1900 bitterly opposed, TO i hoInas JET
.fersou. would 60 tar1 supply H.. The
same means used against Mr. jefferson
thea were brought into Fequisitian against
Mr.. Bachanan in 1856 CIergynsen
turned cir. acred desks into political
rostrums and vomited firth a .heiching
aame OF calnmny and inisreprt senta:icns,
intamousiy false and mingled with: il q
toEreni ofiinprecaiiOR Of the mo>l BIAS
lhemons' character. The same sGFt af
weapons of abuse and falsehood we're
again, IN lS24.gand 1928. brought into
requisition s.ainst General Jackson, with
. similar result The mass Of the clergy
Of New England could not have mole
bitterly fought against Satan himself. had
he heen a presidential candidate In 1900,
1898. aud. 1856. thansthey warred against
Jefferson. JACKSON and Buchanan. 'n.,'
"o Retracing she administration Of the
! soverament'o OF the country from 1901 TO
| 1909. under Jefferson. aud from 1926 TO
1897, under jackson, who would wipe
oui the glorious Eecord hose great pairi
OTIS have left upon he archives OF the
nation. aud who will not 'fejnice that the
unanimous opposition Of New England
20 ihelr election was inefecuai. r
With all the bOasied intelligence Of the
eoIntrS. with all her alleged superiority
over other portions ofthe Union, no man
who's .nos a dolt can fail 10 perceive that
her political action upon great snssional
isSues.sas Illustrated blythe uneFfing tests
kof time and experience. has exhibited
mofs fally and error Than that Of asy
otI.ef : soh Of the Union. She gave
nnahinaans vote. John Adams
4 II slss. az presidrlF F---boih
eal iilsl.ecl. and 10Th men
! n lla . wandered important servicessO
the sDtry. yet Tthesr adqansstraisous
wefe most unsqoicocaIly condemned by
Ithe AlGeriezH people, and few, what
estf Their pfediIeclions, viii, a. this
day. compare them favorabIy with the
| administration OF those hom .hr unani-
mausly opposed By a sci OF similar
suiciiiial folly 10 1866. she has uaani
mously voted Tor a sectional presiden-
| tial candidate wh Sc star WAS in the
assoc endaat. only in those regions of the
Union " here New. England had left her
footprints. aud whose success would m
all probability hsve beeR in it's ultimate
consequences "a deeper blow to her wrl-
! fare aud prosperity than 90 any other
portion Of the cs,nIedeFacy!i ss1l.a-i
Iii these remarks we s!lnde merely
TO the dominant political tone Of New
Englsn.t--not - all her people,. because
We r,CognIze Ia that portion OF her
democracy and in her conservative gciIi-
szeRs Of other parties who have stsrnly
set their faces against the surging tid- :
, Uf fanstical fay which have ragged
IaFeGna-shesa same Of The nohlest Fstriais
sRd best mena of ine Republies But gtt
tthe infamous organs and orators Of a Sec
tiOual crusade, who tannt Pennsylvania
With stupidity and ignorapce and proud-
~ AFFcgate 70 thesnselyes supreme mel
ligencs turn - the tscoed 6f she past.