New-York daily tribune., 1857-04-15
- 49, bond to r,fpnd to ,A. ..t.n. a tn, plaintiff.

cs IN a, "i,o5 vii .cp; y e'yTnd VIVA ~na' beifor
rr s,n,s hc single Question V.s,:heI widow who ha' Re-
.c j. undr any circu' n,,ars bound by law @ T' nd
Wh,c PARTY dies I'M e.;ae provide q : e
That @,ut % Of dsS. Pr,Gas PSSasG % The widow hde
q kin -iors Therefore b.tnr" 9',t''o'"" ~
,~ Ssc. Of rion 20 far At lcs the widow
d sc',G0y e y. The. A' or which 10 the same 'Ie
In ease snS ,ui, hall b. broueh, c' wh.a 1 or.oa
Asys ben pe.est|d 70 The ,a, q The re
.erssd hy law s provided q n ss TIA. "a .a in
aSis di.;baton to next Of kin b9is nav h,yc neg
need ta, any osdlto. e 81 w%i the
% m fo % leIsn1 nan%r PrrSrd by Of The 1, n paid or
1.-THE dec"ssed TO whoa any asset '"'
SsnsIisd ,ssh the manner presa ey law and WHO arc
actions (.sy, the statute resusng a. Seeaased to
o - S The ,sue Of a,y s,-ets mat may aaTs e ns
NAV he broast against any OF me by racs Of thcr1
saRs s. 4gb Ard Nc allowance or q. g, ,bn ,.si b,v
soeoun Of ;cre btHs oheI one ef The nest Of kb 81
made liab msirtan an ae,ion d v ,.io. Nh.
ct. or assinst sry them separa'y tor J' a'' 'q"'
be- sn that the next Of lin in tb,s. P PT1
x;o~s !. no, uses is strict Of blood rela'i'.
y ,he TJ ,1s ssy ets hail have ou paid Tn La,nIe
would appear have had in view not SO THcn b con.n
The relationship be it that of bloot or mar as w
tad in The eye the law, bs for hc sa bIrthen
bounty Numerous insnce. o w Vii be- 70 md cited by
term otn, in the sense W D. snfhoric.-ahough
.oha, conflicting in o;hs5 rst .r 4 The ,onx Of the
sat, or ru,nent woud TO reqnITe saet an me- p
,o Nowhere rce-ona9ie n.Ia. me- VI M az ' dPssed
or tho, ,hs widow web s. the ohfr r'a,Tes I G ,
is enly TO the assets remaining aver he payment
Of deS's esec oy n, Scoure in which the widow
ft,I how large estate takes the whoen sn.h Sse u
to- in Twelve months after hi debtor deeeascd may Dc wy
y rnede.s Such statute Of limitations with 10 SAVING IN
f..r minors, victims Oi acldet ""Hu "
too rigorous endurance No Legislature should be presumed
70 s Ia n risb so as wei as the rights of her husbands
creditors require that the widow should IN some resPto @
heat b. treated Of h next Of kin Among other IN
the notice 1 ~ OH" T } m " osn e
accounting is confined 10 the creditors ana next 9 XII
81 The light be cited TO attend an accounting limited 70
Abe sesG 'Rs Jss 9eS' spray c b larger and The
sole interest the appIaisement or was henueu
careful examination and coPpaGn OF the an different @ geo %
tions Of the several statnte. on .hS @ sHHe % n % @
oomprehcndng the widow, and sometimes contradsn-
Stance mus; depend upon the context and the consequences
.Sa % sA m 1 10 be- ebrad in the same manner as other
relatives receiving portions OF the estate ,..s .,.
Demurrer oyerTuled aud judgment for plaintiff with cos
Before Judge MITCHELL
John Munroe Sc John PiingtOn &c William B. Scott
Gc, agt. The Same Demurrer 20 Complaint
THE CoURT-PER MITCHELL, J.-The defendants
On 10th February, 1856 delivered to Fleming Alden, mer
.a'"'' ,''" i' '1' ', NEw YorS; Feb Is 1856.
this morning respecting your drawing exchanges upon us
rShSses S daS upon US viii be- duly onorcd and protected
this power however subject being withdrawn at any fu
f0fe time veg 'biyANNIEEI ME oPIIiiK1NGroN,
OF and for the firm of Pikinston Brothers. Liverpool
bills to be- drawn under the deposited and
showed to Scott Co lPan'1h IN the second s" M to De
tias in the fret suit who, on the faith of t. purchased draft
bic in sixty days sht and drawn the defendants
They paid for the draft is true value ss6 7a Scott Co.
circamsances The presented for acceptance but
acceptance refused and they protested The plain
tifs claim the amount of the face of the BILL with
the prc nigm of exchange OF London IT,, .,.-..u..
no restriction the there restriction to
The amount the number Of d9ys or the place OF al
England aud either at Liverpool in London, the
porum Of exchange oI bills that country 1t accordingly
not disputed that Fleming Alden could sustain action
against the defendants they could show injury to them
selves such could not be met by greater equity in favor
defendants insist that there priviiy the contract
teF persons Fleming Alden and that
no other person avail himself oft. This the
pS @ Ils b ISr Seu Oc course sns Of wSbe nCnded a. an
agreement in which but the defendants and Fleming
to them to be exhibited with them thus
tons id,css Of intent is that the article to
neso;abe paper TO circulate from hand 70 hand ana
perfect title each purchaser tor valuable consid
maturity and consisted of foreign bills 70 be
drawn this country and TO be accepted another and which
in the usual Of business would be sold here before hy
would BE- rctted abroad BY this agreement TO accept all .
,S n egs S. al yb the iI 20 believe that beI intended
that such dealers should rely this the defendants
also mnst have perceived that understanding
Of others The letter could be very little service, f.
until they should accept There wa no such limitation IN the
auhor accept all that the defendants should draw
before te power should be withdrawn the liability of the de-
fenda;s was complete tine bill drawn and neso
tiated and ss O such bill could not be withdrawn.
Such unlimited discretionary powers must haye been gwen as
Others might act the freely without knowledge OF amy
stCtio the of the drawers Of the bills II Is mcTed
10 the amount OF the purposes for which the drafts soud be
drawn their time, and most likely would relate to
fWO TO all of Me ted
pow,q could object except exhibited
public and to become al agreement with them also.
paper object that accompany
such paper wherever and that the letter be
rent and nego able as the principal 10 which Incl
dent IL is like the certificate good bank check and
like that is intended only for the of the whom
the bank delivers 4, but of all who may serward accept
n this essentially differs from credit established BY
that all that te last party ask that the second party
should give him such credit on his books and allow him to with
oew the amount OF the credit The letter OF credit from its
nature IN that case not to be exhibited to dealers with
draw second pa ty he deposit the letter
with the second party the authority t the second party
acknow edgent party credit On the
strength Gfti he may DRAW that an instrument aae us
aud lender eSy and not affecting the first party OF this
DEMO S7S} TS1fs Brown Brother. co Of NSSIor s
TrSe to their house in L,.POO stating that, at the request
open credit for 3 900 in frvor OF D. negotiated BY
sight; that the lstter w0nld keep S. T advised
ss TO the credit used who wOaa attend TO pacns them u
wss to transmit te the yeTFso house there TO remain in
So.e wS the % on Gd Sia M sGsS the S
D.. The purposes of the letter ended whea this
hm (the Liverpool house. and to enable him TO otan credit
with that firm alone. Tb after that house should
that house aud could accordingly could nl.
The New York house their Utter EA%fas eeo when the
the former class Russell sgt wksin quoted Hin
of Louisiana sst Cestss ESr Is Comst S u thcdast cse
nc s'eeS CoaI OF New York sent letter 10 Kohn DAon