New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-04-11

,-cr.Is,' r-'' b. s-ed q 49, fen ctr sr svee, 20
soui s.ye. To tsy i sncs to~svr thI CIu.Ieous
e,iitr.o ts..ssls I'd II ssoh .Dh,s-y .py.sst
co. SGt b. .dated, G. TO .d~i 1t sccId b. % cossrs.
t'd uie q as Wt'ee 70 BIDS tbs, 'aeh eyideece
81 - oauy e.StsAsL 4,
tier. bsr. s.Ss aasU'g - hs PiP-T ia the s,eov,
.T} 'i'frIr . bt to- i a. sursro- ty to, laNo
49, Ard first wat per-, spoken OF IN Oh. coot-kti
s,ts see ,h .ht c, reSssnes ). e.niJ lie s,r.a I'D
Io.!i.i .srd "a, otscr 'ooE SUBJECTS spoken OF To.
sCt .pet.6 ot-t~;1ns ~. II e. der n. sa
tu'cte q b. sun Il desis ht.3; tbs raoua ostso
rti,ored inci.et,,y il oescbus .aboet {, .apeet
o.b+r be,se for which wanted sad n ns
o,ber o.cSs.op ,hFoushou; tie psper.
Il. sb,p Ciss ReprBis o. As .tcs.. 81 6,S, =,
vtch rsa, t.J have ever $500, to eT.
oufi to parts # The tppc .,iOa aoh .re uar port..
IL -qu ss .uppihs .r elpsss AIRED proper
Re supped. the p.p-I reads subssa italy above. De
MSS Of s556G Do. L. &c ss ce S
point n plaintiff suss. At which deudsD rnsrrsnce i. to
eoun.rc, tDSzeJ go 00 does not hat Poi1t
... property az thar is mentioned in the Pper |. he
III t9us tSe up 10; toe subject Or zoe tleish,,
an vn.bIe 70 sny 's.son Or opportunity for'oeh
On soue 10 .dnitsd that panGas bad and
cid sDy ne have seto e insurance .nd as Sere
no and Ius b for seodn 'Ae' were
Before judge DAVIES.
AsYU POINT IN THL LAW or RrPLTyIS.
Juhn '. CD aud others ast. Peter Rice aid spother
Tbs action in replevin The complaint
charged tie decnSsps had sfuly aud held
1t tLoussnt eight hundred ard tiryflr Light Osusburs
bar, tie usus demand s1d refusal The contained
a.t deps snd claimed that The bags toe property
81 w f. Schmidt Co. NOT a. p.sibtfs and deliS
,r,d tie deebaaats By ". f. Schmidt Co. in for
o.ber esGs. sc.
II appeared In evidence that W. +. Schmid. Co hired Of
tAt plaintiffs n bszs il question taking bill Of the
bottom Il Which written IN Of The bsss should
be returned sDi i.sirE they should De paid for s
CERTAIN rate 1t s!so shown th. Rice Co obtained
session Of he permit and took al the bags troI the Cuom
oue bat ina. upon the repvin -ut beius menced al
bsss With Gle Co marx then in possession Of Rice
Co. hs6 been taken by the Sheriff or returned b. deodants
but that there cas- bszs lees bsn the bill Of .dns called
BY tie counsel thai scton
Should have ben s'.umP a,sir schmidt Co. for the value
Of he es thai BY Of the hiring they had the ion
eiter for the bs sd therefore tns,
the Pre- py psstc out Of the plaintiff and repevn eou1 not
be n s.ntautd-
The Judse charged tie Jury that the action properly
p7n that the property In zee bags had not passed or Of the
pauii and that hey had their lien IN aud ,ud not BE-
compelled BY third PARTY look 10 toe simple credit OF
Schmidt Co. for nent That % TO the mise "a 3d. 1t wn
for The Jury Ubeher Rice Co. had those aud
,o then they verdict for the plaintiffs iof the full
amount claimed. .
The Jury brought verdict fr the plaintiff for the sSs
bags return uLder the reoesn and s.ssed the value
1t ST. AS t2lr0 Ard also for the plaintiff for III e}0
the value Of SIS bgs not returned and missing Allowance Of
r. r. bfaIbuy and Frederick Lane fa Plaintiffs Beebe
DOnohue and Judge Desn for defendants