New-York daily tribune., 1857-09-30

s;e Is b. os'r ut res I; =, .,..~ q. d, rs,.
Is.n'- &c o-'a n, -, .a't,...s c. "a, ,s NJ,
tie p-ocea for y" ub.ns o6t.Set an ote. TO- 's,r
% .EsnS os ts '' rs .s s tS g % .:t
a:ed term ofthe D.ric, Cont held 9Th Of Jaus s
c,n.G ss p'o Se. ,o aS s.Hs 1Iss ~
his -S ert.'ed, sna.the le.' di.@..ea os
nd y, the c.usc OF tie ex. aud h,, IN 0t
e. .b ser.ssns ws
n, psce os,epcs A. s;a.ei tern of the Coa ee
r ..ns By re rroc,or, W cs.at IN. proc,
The hant' again deeind to pr'e-ea and moved pos
The csn,r srd entered .Se~sby - the
TENS tee pr,ious order and t.i',ns the e G w.t oi
is sow sGs Sy the proctor.
p-ee, ci,n,. the sppea r want Ct opoa the
s urd that The orter decree OF the VonH ee'" dm"Aa
the .is,l po' frsl decree. .,.,. ,,,
By IT,, s9,h rule Ct the Supreme Court Aday II IL any
Ao,lty .r belant ,hs not sppear ard prosecute n
soooGny the and order, Of the Court ne sas
BE t,eued IL u and c9ntm:cy and toe Sr lii may he De-
may be dis missed with costs an1 oy ne
4h rule the Court msy n its dt'crtoo upon n.ioI OF .s .s
su in which the deere hsve been esu she hes lo
within t. dsy. a. the decree hss entered zoe defend
snbIug such further orders and terms a. me eoa
The pcceednss the Corr. below the refusal Of the
proctor 20 ute hi. suit UndeTstsd ther
osth rule sud analogous those in the mGOn Law
Courts wser the p.n.a is no pressed fo not Pro'eoans
Oouit
The decree judgment decree,
Tot therefore the subject of appel Wi, OF
lees specially provided for BY law.
dmisss TO be se, aside and the Court to
Snz fresh sui, ORDER decree OF csmisa suo 6ua
ceneluve Of the subject matter oil the the
In tn case before VI, should entertain the sPpes sad
reverse the orde, the oougt dsnsns the be could not
proceedings the Count below end direct that Court
20 the cause we n" such por' h cnn
would be u'urps;iou Of the jurisdiction OF the District
which has ogrs s these cse
SUI satisfied therefore. that have Jurisdiction in th'
csse, and that the sppes! must be discharged
PRACTICE REMANDISG VESSEL INTO 'CsfoDt Y
JURISDICTION.
Tie t,rk White Squall syt. John 0srdrey ct al.
NELSON G.. J-rhe hbelsnts 10 the Court below
filed their libel against the vessel enforce the OF
the usual bonds under the &C. Of Congress- March 1877
decree ,nbsrueny rendered in .he Cont DsSS @ sr .ns
serwsrd as sac Bad been discharged the Of Con.
OF said act An appeal taken from ths decree to this
Court and duly perfected Pending hi. sppe and before
proctor for he respective parties providing ,e Of the
vessel apon certain terms sud conditions therein mentioned
Gus ody Of the Marshal and also by ;hs officer And
the 18th Msy. 1857 order obtained from me out OF
Court directing the Clerk enter an order OF record according
to the consent given by the parties | sm now '.ts
eS I'd that DMr @ order % auSssy Ss S s And the
beinf presented motion ty party who clsim- to have
or IN the cause aha. shat the order catered
upon the filing o the consent II the pOcto OF the respective
thai concerned
r. upon the written stipulation etfeed into by
procors alone The purchase, at the sale OF the vessel has
peared and opposes motion bat he had fall notice of
the and cu the. the order Il sale invalid
would be coucsted perceive equity emitting him to
particular favor Indeed il othorwse II Woud mo-
decision, vacate the order Oh the ground that
we Lad DO pows- o jurisdiction TO make IL
tho gran the order have bad to look
deliberately the question 20 tho Of the urt to
order back into the custody Of the Marshal which has
been fairly dchsged the srest the stipulston and
satisfied th; the Court such power Pho ea
for conclusion the OF the nion az
this Such understand. s.o to lie the ri" of tue En
e.h Admiralty 70 Eng L. and Eq K 5b' VIM Rob l'i.
ID 3s3, IS Law Rep. 5bj)
Ordere~ that rUle he vNa.ed.