Mountain Democrat., 1857-06-06
-ReporGNL BY ,IAO. q. EsstiG, Esq.
Proceeding OF thc District COurt-11th
JuAlelal District.
Nay seth, 1857.
nOH. ). u. HOWELL PRESIDING.

L. j. Olmstead vs. +. M. Olmstcad-
Judgment for plaintiff with costs, aud It
is ordered that defcndcnt's ditch ba aba
ted
Margaret 4. Winningham vs. James
Observation-Disclosures Of divorce granted.
II. {. Lee ct al w 5. Mccormick
Judgment for plaintiffs, with go DANA
yes and costs.
Lewis Ahrahams VS. Tantllcr 4 Co.
Demurrer sustained and 70 days given
Plaintiff to file amended complaint.
The People, cx rel, Raum and Plant,
VS. the Board Of Supervisors ct al-COn-
tinucd under advisemcnt.
--Jamcs Mcknight w w. p. Scott ct al
Demurrer taken under advi~mcnt.
W. Bartram vSD. w. Lcvan---Publica.
ton Of notice to persons holding liens on
defendants property ordered.
j. Alexander ct nj VS. Vim. CArEile ct
al-COntinucd on affidavit Of Plaintiffs.
W. II. G. Cloud w, the County Of FL
Dorade-I'ried by the Court and taken
under adviScmcnt.
John IIcrtlink ct al VIZ 0. HoltOn ct al
fried by the Court and taken under
ndviScmcnt.
{. T.. Waltham vs. Z. y. CarSOn-Or.
dcrcd that depOSitiOnS be taken before a
proper officer.
Z. Il. Waltham VS. j. q. Waltham--J.
q. EustiS appointed referee to take tcsti.
mOnv.
W. p. Scott VS. Alexander Hunter
Judgment for Plaintiff with costs.
| q. W. Cowdrcy vs. HomcC Brewster ct
| al-DiSmiSScd at Plaintiffs cost.
| The Court adjourned till next term.
| - a-..-...---.----
FOR CONTROLLER OF STATE.-Jamcs W.
Vaudeville, Of TuOlumnc; J. W. ID. Par
mer, Of .AnadOr; g. W. Dent, Of San JO-
aquin, and Thomas Findlay, Of Nevada,
arc mentioned in connection with the
COntrOllcrshiP. They arc all good men
and true. Vaudeville has 'donc the
State some scrvicc,~ and has ever been
an uncOmprOmiSing Democrat. Tho Sun,
the organ Of Mr.. Brodcrick in San Fran.
cisco, has taken especial delight TO ira.
ducc him, because he would not Join that
silly and unreliable sheet in its violent and
useless dcnunciations Of all Democrats
who did not agree with It on tho Vigi.
lance question. Better Democrats than
the editor Of the ISUn-DcInocrats who
have done more for the party, who will
lo more for the party, who arc sOlicitous
for its success, who have adhered to its
fortunes in times Of danger and defeat,
favored the Vigilance Committee, and it
is tho height Of folly TO read them out Of
the party for difference Of opinion on
that question. Many good but mis-.
guided men, sincere in their convic-
tions, honest in their intentions, sym
patlliscd with the Committee, aud any
attempt to oStraciSc them will meet with
a stern rcbuke from tho mountain Dc.
mOcraey. II was not party question:
men Of all parties sustained the Commit
tcc--mcn Of all parties opposed il. II
the SIN is determined to denOuncc all
Democrats who Sympathiscd with the
Committee il will have its hands full
We speak adviscdly when VIC say that
two-thirds Of the Democracy Of Fl Do
RADIO favored the Committee. We Op.
posed it vchcmcntly and honestly, but
while VIC exercised the right to express
Our views We did not deny the same
privilege 10 those who differed from Us.
We have had enough Of il. We wish to
sec it buried in oblivion. Tho past can.
not be rccallcd;--thc question should no
longer bC Agitatcd. II can do no good. II
may bc productive Of disastrous results.
| - a-----
| .InnN II WRlIER- MThn Democratic