The national era. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1847-1860, 1857-01-08
kf.s.'h.l523.

{Ma replete with intera..
MIS- R with the glacier world and 1 !. Oh 1t
Nv a.: sau % srchais and his T;n IT, ana Its maj
VI Ppys ~ :. relations to France and ui .n
80 NET upon. A short ariel u !. 0'n the
E,Ssber - u anoaile's Geographical Ra,o @i''
III TAettv novel entitled Pervers;on 10; ,,
5slrreversn,, .! censured as "intolerant as1
Il lFr.ncesan a review Of De Tooa~o-;, anu
4 ,,h Oolore the Revolution is then r levine
q tish eommendation bestowad . ''en given' and
y 1orthy of the author 'eu on the book, as
4 na' the article that ba,
! MINI, ;a uu psen frequently referred to IN ,ha
49, journals, as well as on the eoo. 90 .ne
kaNha es senate, is the last one. entitled
xkaoS, ,'.Pai Crisis in the United States y ord
EHSlba !, nus own avowal to be written bv W p !
now ofn Esq, formerly of South Carolina ari
4fmaa FORK While it has provoked a. -
te mode of its reception :. $3.50 e.. Oe :,
INV. Lis hardly possible fOr =, - PROOF o. IS
Just Following, too, political can
-suai excitement, to Judge of its
Win much elaboration or candor.
M y % anoroing him the means by
q kpd 10 form his opinions. the
soor birth and residence seems
nue. consequence. The Question
- "ne'aer his views are true and honest
Pressed And for fair doo;a;o- -:
'eneYe the most honest course is for
ING article for themselves. We hone
- ~ 30 ana form their conclusions. IRE.
'ne comparatively immaterial ones.
= sssszriter. and why did he write 10
The London 'QsIterly opens with a fne az
ticle on on Lord BA cons Essays, edited bv
Archbishop Whately, M which due praise is
given both to Bacon a4d his able annotator.
French Algeria furnishes a topic Of interest,"
presenting bird's-eye view of the history,
present condition, and prospects, of that coun-
try In church building, are dropped some
useful hints on the defects of these structures.
and means for improvement suggested. Then,
short article on new Biographies of Montaigne.
and re longer ones, respectively on Ancient
x md he Physiognomy of the Human
Fqm tEhe.f orlner of which is enriched with
mfy ST at%tics and facts, as also the latter is
hlkd a nth much curious and attractive mat.
- he nuns of "Port Royal" as topic,
g4es Ne writer an opportunity to call up to the
rf 8 attention some famous men who with
ttsca and Arnauld, battled the Jesuits in the
'ause of truth, and the hardl y-ever-failing po
inca article closes the number, in the shape
tn declining efficiency of Parliament
the North British Recie,o, we have three
0tsfnr hsding articles. The first is on CDR
Chr mers's Works." not so favorable in some
RESPECTS, and, as we think, less able than we
mig ut look for, in respect to one of the found
ers of this Quarterly. Another is an interesting
exa rnination of Fronde's History of England"
towhich high credit is given, as an important
ami Thorough work; also, one on "the Work
men of Europe" that gives many interesting
fcts relating to their condition. Lord Cock
bans Memorials is taken up evidently by a
friendly hand, who vindicates his author from
Lhrd Bongham's scathing notice in the Law
Magazine, and whom he repays by various facts
gathered from personal research, not quite SO
honorable to that veteran of literary men.
1Perversion = is made the subject of notice like
WISE under the head of religious novels, while,
as an interesting article, the on " The Sight,
and How to See," will attract the attention of
many who find the subject one in which they
feel personal sympathy. The number thus
combines much that is instructive and pleasing