The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1857-03-31
Domestic Difficulties Among the Wealthy
sUPAEME COURr-sPBcIAL TERM.

kUPAEhE COUhT-SPkClAL TENN
Before Hoo iucge Roosevelt
MACH 90 In the nar Of Ae oppicauop fcr I've hsleas
copts Of the infant child Of NJ. and Mrs. PaIdn0 -
This case was resumed. Mr. Noyes, who appeared on
behalf Of Mrs. P.uloins said UPON the agreed facts
IN he case mother entitled 10 the permanent
custody Of the child Of wnoh -De had now possession
by the order OF The court; asd = he anxious
old any unpeassntnes no dd not propose TO bring
In any evidence but would have for Ar Pauloiug, II
be ssw proper, prove that wife unfit 10 take
charge Of the CHILD.
Mr. Fullerton considered THAI that disposipg Of the
matter in = very summary way dc did not yet under.
stand the law 70 be chargod toat the wife vas ente
priwa fccia " posseisor VI the on dren the gentle
man talked about ".gr.ed factA' he (Mr under.
,,ood the Court simply 70 hsvs given possss,oo Of the
child 10 the mother pg he cot OF tue allegations
Of both parties srd unit the lie shows something
against The character OF this eecticm,u (Mr Psiliing)
re xss entitled 10 The Possession o. inc cad u tue
Aai, mstve for them he weud ike TO understand 20
from the Court.
The Court said TIE que s,ou ~as where in the pre-
ut state OF the Law pre- med gh Of lstosy Of the
child existed. Tho Old com Lac gave shsi rsni 10
the father from The onn OF Tho cotd 90 s manic ID or
womsntooo but nce the age Of the var Gus statutes
o. iris state Ter In discretion of sor Couct
de'e ed not 70 strict legal ryst but % e,a%
ter OF domestic expectancy Toe e'atu provided ior
Of mother fahes Nv az IL stsse OF sepsrsou
wncre there nigga. be In ant On dien 20 young nat IL
would be proper for the soher 70 hsy their custody
should yeid to the ns.ars, r,ut the mother. de
would be bound by the spr. NJ the siautcs rrrefsrence
10 that Of The old con man law a. considered one fac
complain, s,sin,t ethan ,ias Assuming taa
there nosetg ssain-s vber party except inc mere
The othtr the question thes -as where was fAm CHILD
70 be ptncpG the infer uus'e sts,o If tbipr
Mr Fullerton suppa snAs question bad been already
The Ccurt-Yes, and The bur.bep OF proof must rest
with he 'atber, who alleges thai the N bcr not the
pxnyss persou TO !, Ike cha e. oih
NJ. Full ron did slider that the parties st od
equal the Court he DID suppose mat thsre
evda thai The osher sss In the wrong inscnuct
she I'D ien the hease Of he ousoan she VA cstensbly
for esvirg. II baa been bed hat the wife 10 not
psned IL leaving She horsv of her hassand nor 10 she
erti.ed 10 We advantage Of The recent statutes uni
sht we're I. position 70 obtain separate m nsen
on Bill Hled Tor cruel and b h iman treatment.
After Some conver,a ion between the counsel knf The
iutse tie Ccuri reuAk cd tia WAS not hn business 70
ise adv ce but he eohsdered would De IN use 70 put
In writing and publsb the details Of The m nhc Goa 70
vCsy between III. 30 pArgies thereby destroying any
'ope 81 On sdjustment
gone TIE advice Of your Horror is very asrsea Die 10
my fyis nd on the other ride sssmuce they got
al hat hey seek 70 st an al tat Inc, want In this
Mr. NoyesH The oh or ste sh ,ose TO 20 into the evi
dcrce ne pre- ear.d TO n. AID vii be abe o
sbo~ state q fscis seYy unotnpste for hr psa1iuG
Kr. rulleytor-we do intend I, 20 into u. All shall
be ready 10 nsss sa) ,nps yso have put orrart
Guild. bowsvv sik the oours 20 into the surm ma
I've whtse III: ether side vi, b. pcr nit Cd % say
xoep. meet the evidence VIC esvs is rsyad 10 Mrs
.suici,C W 70 ca and q proof 10 shos iss, enc
rsquAned 10 nj charge Of the child, vii they be
haea meeting thai evi al they he per niud
fhe oou I sad that whep ina, question sroM Il would
bc tire escueh 70 dccii. prop II.
Alter some dtsultory Conversation the case was uu
macy sst dowc ior NJ 'sbf xoorsy 10 April.