Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-03-10
NOTICE.

NOTICE. -,
Talliaferro, and others, Complainants, =:
|. as. 49, i
Patrick, and others, Defendants. - -
-. Ii IN CHANCERY. J +.
ITO Alexander G. Taliafefro and Agnes.
J. his wife, William Marshall, Mary NJ.
Archer, Fielding 4. MARSHALL, James F.
Jones and Ann L., his wife. John T..
Smith and Margaiet L., his wife, Thomas
Marshall, Eliza Marshall, Robert L. Dou-
that and Mary A., his wife. Mildred P,
Marshall, Jacqueline "A. Marshall Elliot
N. Braxton and Ann NJ his wife, Ellen
NM arshall, Jacqueline B. HOWE, Mary
HOWE, Ellen Howie, Anderson Wade and
Susan, hiswife, w. NJ. HOWE. Ann How
ir, Jno. Marshall, A. A. Marshall. Jas. E.
Marshall, Fielding Douthat and Mary W.,
his wife,. Jas K Marshall. Edw. C. Mar
shall, Jannet r. Harrison, Geo. D. Fisher,
Lucy NJ Norton Edw. C, Fisher, n. c.
KenneyF and Mary A, his wife, Mary
Fisher, Raleigh Colston, Ann F. Colston,
James G, Paxton. Jas. w. Massie, B. J..
Jordan, Samuel F. Jordan. George Fish
er surviving executor Of E. J. Canning
ton. decd, George F., Harrison, Edward
J. Harrison, Carter II. Harrison and
Henry Harrison plaintiffs, and Spieer
!, Patrick and Virginia his wife, Aaron
Stockton. William fompkius. Joel Shrews-
bury, William Dickinson, Samue! Steele,
Robert G. Steele. John Alexander, Sam
uel Alexander, Susan c. Thornton, Ann
NJ. Wilson. Barbara Wilson, Sally Will
sen, Ann G. Marshall, - Marshall,
Emily Howic, Mary Fisher. Lucy c..
Fisher, Susan L., Colston, William S.
Wilson, Betty A. Fitzhugh, Mary A.
Harrison, Margaret L. MARSHALL. Fanny
Marshall and John Marshall defendants
Tin the above Chancery suit: s
- Take Notice,
That at the Fall Term 1856, of the Circuit
Court for Kanawha Co. and State fYa.,
decree was rendered in the above cause,
ordering, among other things, reference
Of said cause to John L. Mosely. Esq. a
Special Commissioner for that purpose
appointed, with Instructions TO report up
on the title Of the land mentioned in the
Bill and sought to be divided and rarti-
toned in saidscause, embracing the fol-
lowing enquiries, to wit: +, 49,. 4. ~
| "lst Whether the claim of title, To
John Steele nineteen thousand FIVE hun
dred acre suryey, is correctly stated in the
Bill. - >. IT,
end. Whether the several interests oil
the present owners OF said tract of land
are correctly ascertained and set out in the
Bill. 80 r. ~. - .
: Sd. What is the interest of each own
er inzthe whole tract7 :ss
4th. What is. the interest Of each own.
Ter, to whom lot B., is assigned, in said
lotB. ~ - -
5th. What is the interest Of each own.
er, to whom lots c.. and E. are assigned,
in said lots G. and E. !
/ 9Th, And that said Commissioner re.
port any such other and further matter
as to him may seem proper, or any Of the
parties require.% =,
| And take notice that / have fixed upon
Monday the 18th day Of January 1857 as
the time, and the office, of Parks and
fMosely in the town Of Charleston County
of Kanawha and state of Virginia, as the
jphce, for complying with the foregoing
acquisitions Of said Decree, at which time
and place any Of the parties who thini
proper may attend.
il John L. MoSELY,
: - 'ts..N Srecisl Commissioner