New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-03-19
sURROGATY's COCRr-Bsfore A. w. BRADFORD.
THY JURISDICTION OF The SURROGATE OVER FART


NERsHIP ASSETS.
In the matter u The e'.t. Of Joseph P Sells. tece-
The De 1roner Robert +. Bshc cE, atms tO be sur-
partner toe interstate and sppies for payment OF
sed be due TO bin en- partnership SCOUT lis
n-cton the bushes, the hnn The nesoip clearly
proved There satisfactory evidence "nsoias me 70 t
sv Of accounts and u 10 nesessAy
tall back on the rule that the meulo OF Ae hu arc
pe.uu b. equally interested In the psncr'hp .ets In
he Ah nee OF al proof the SELLS len m
session It the ,nerhp properly and disposed OF u aux
Sc tbs. the insesiae indebted 10 nia
III sun Il > 100 on pIivs,e acc 1unt 49,, S..,
suITet however by the adnn. Ts'oT that the saIfos'e
h"n Jurisdiction to order ct di'Pu,el OF u
Court AID balance sscrtAhed and ound due The sen"s
disputed by tue executor or sdmnsftsEo was MY
con.ider.d Csnpb-il Brown Il Bf.dt H., r. %O.
nor lave that decision % change
The view. then expressed The expressly author
and S.fsnrivr share. on the application OF creditor
erstce next Of siD aud on dual accounting 10 ode
debt lain es,cy b.Ge,, dst i'a'v.
.h.re" (2ks u6 Ris. s. as m The term deets
per,ots limited such 'rcty esa deos but
nsnie'y eomPebeLt, every lain and Gem.ad D. ,s
whe h'r recos eiab!e at law or In eqn tEk 81
n ISL: 81 eSi D. 50 losh p - o. l5li " stl
9 81 l6ll) In 9th words nclu i-s equitable ~ well
lead ,bts In ihe of Payne Mhsws Is Paige 49, a
surviving claimed ba ancr due him By MS drces GO
demand the fourth class Ct debts due from the e'se OF he
dec.d. rdns the order prescribed by me Revised stat
His sI sssr Tue bAstcs due from the d-ceit 70 his
".uIv partner OF the partnership ,-Anstco
zion OF All The copsrineT-hp effects equa4-
between them uoqudsied demsud OF this class
the dcefent the time his death aud when sha
have qudAed by compansn and the personal rep
Of esse (the deceased or ~ me SErosde i'ho
1, pet~nf 10 pass UPON fhe su,mer, ana drtbT'oa Of
the tnGfe lqudste equitable well 40 legal demand,
deere. bis Court refer 10 master The os ,nce
that ha be- due TO the complainant must b. paid 10 nun
the dc,efeut the otacf credit
Z, r. In Dskiu DENIM, Paige. 81 the principle
oecsred regard claims stowitg ou' OF ru't II
would thereto ths distinction exists IN respect 10
the the Suuogse regard 70 lezs and elusble
debs OF the obvious design OF ths chene and
the Revised Statutes tor the sds meat OF the
the incoLvnce staying the hoa accounting snd
,snbuou because certain claims happen 10 eqna
be principles the abolition of the distinction be-
equitable right, 10 Involved in
the coo ana in giving enty utid
the of as do tee called send the
etouer ltscction unless plainly required 10 do
ere nothiu. peculiar IN his which would appear
10 rnd the exercse discretion (Wrsefyrt Grgg
Bsb ch. 400; Kidd Chatham, Bid 4Rj; Campbell
ut Bowen Biadf p There must be decree establish
ng the claim Of the applicant at the amount shove stated
SUPERIOR COURT-CH.MsERs-MArc ls.-Bofore Judge
SLOssoS.
Ainswick AIT. Mclaughlin.
Order for examination OF Judgment debtor va
csted with 8 costs.
Reilly sst. Thompson
judgment entered BY defendant vacated with =
costs.
SUPREME COURT-SPEcIAL TsRN-Msrch l8-Before
Jsdge ROOSEVELT.
THE EIGHTH AVENUE BANK.
In the Of the Eighth Avenue Bank
Retort If John l.. nssOu 10 assess stocsholiers
prr ned fued unless 10 contrary b. shown
~ ths Court on the .b.h inst