Daily Nashville patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1857-1858, 1857-03-28


heel Of the Docket, but all shall be q
are reached
Rule 2D.-Judgmenss in unlitiga'
by default NAV be taken as hereto
Rule jD.-It shall be the duty O
days after the adjournment Of Cou
stated, and publish in one or two n
eulation, the causes set for trial
third, and fourth weefs, so that tn
may have notice when their attend
RUIZ 4rH.-It shall furthermore
in issuing subpenas for he witnes
attend on the first, second, third,
Term, accO ding 10 the place the ca
Under the above Rules the follow
trial during the Term.
LIST ~ eek. l1S5
/ Seay vs. Cameron; 1S6
9 shelby VS. Martin; 1851
8 Wal ,er vs. rates; lSS
4 Mayor & Aldermen, ex- $50
parte l9l
3 Gowdy VS. Marshall; 1871
8 same vs. same; 192
Z Baldwin VS. Ellio; 1873
S York & Co. vs. Mckenzie; 1874
9 McCampbell vs. Bell; 1875
10 Same VS. R0bards & Bell; 1gi
II Jasper vs. b rms; 1871
IL L1whorn VS. Davis 1875
10 McCampbell vs. CiemOns;
il Jackson VS. Gilbert; 1879
Is Turnpike, Charlotte VS. 2Ja
Spence; l2n
Is Gross vs. Greene 202
II Evans & smith Va Shivers; 203
Is Martin VS. Armstrong; 204
10 turnpike, Charlotte, VS. POS
Spence;
90 Ayres ct al VS. Gilbert; FOG
81 Hyde vs. Maddox; POI
% Davis vs. M0s-ly; 205
% Turnpike, Charlotte, VS. .209
Spence; 2iO
81 Hughes VS. Gilbert; 2ll
25 Allen vs. Goodrich; 2l2
26 Frazier VS. S b Toledo; 213
81 Goldberg vs. Hinton;
IS Mckee VS. Noel; ga
90 Same vs. Same; rs
80 Wi Jams VS. Pitts; 21h
81 johnson vs. Radcliffe; Eli
81 Same VS. Orion; us
IS Harrison, ct al vs. Bow 2 9
ling & Stratton; % }
81 S1egog VS. Robards; 22l
IS Sloan VS. Halle;
So 222
81 WilsOn VS. McGehee; 223
IS Duncan vs. PlImmer; IA
80 Same vs. Same; 225
40 Same vs. Same;
IL Townsend vs. harris; 226
~ Woods, J A, VS. Mcclure, 227
Buck, & Co.;
43 McAnally VS. Tenn. & Ala 22S
RRCO.. 229
A Turnpike VS. Spence; 230
- Paryin ct al VS. Lande 4 PSI
Elsbach; 232
46 Hall VS. Lucas; 233
AZ Sloan vs. Warne; 234
As Edgefield a Ky r Z VS. 235
W Lowe; 23G
40 Hardeman vs. Wetmore; 237
50 WO1dsou VS. Prierson; 23S
81 Woodland vs. McGavock; 239
SO Same VS. Same; 240
SO Joiner VS. Taylor; 241
So Meigs vs. Roscoe;
IS Gill VS. Bel; PAP
Sc State vs. Horn; 243
81 White, Richard, VS. Price 4 244
Anderson; 245
IS Warner vs. Leake; 246
SO Doyle VS. Newell; 247
60 Smiley VS. Jones; 24S
81 Childress VS. Jackson; 249
81 Mafhewson vs. Phillips; 2J0
So 5 ales VS. Railroad; 25l
g. Austin VS. Hays; l252
65 Jack on vs. Bel Caroline s
Sc Anthony VS. jackson; 253
g. Bolton, Dickens q Co. VS. 254
Kimbro; 2E5
6S Bradley VS. Edmondson; 256
50 Doe. lessee VS. Higgins; 25I
10 Ensley vs. Vance; 25S
II Nancy vs. Harris; 259
~ Madden VS. Railroad; $50
70 Mayor & AID vs. Je1ries; PSI
"a Young vs. Barns; 1852
Is p TX vs. Elliot; 2 8
T6 Fowler 4 Ludlow VS. John 264
son, Horne a Co.;
II Stacker, trustee, VS. Napier 26'
Is Wilson, ct al VS. Scales; 26G
70 Hicks VS. Shelby; '267
50 Bilbo & wife VS. Maxey, 26S
Mcclure & Co; .26g
81 Duncan, VS. Hooper;
50 Faulkner, vs. l. d n K K; ZIG
g Garner vs. NJ nton; 2T1
81 Grant VS. Campbell: 27z
s. Hollins vs. Plummer 4 Co; %.
Sc Heny vs. Faulkner; ga
81 Hertha VS. Clark; 27S
SIS Henderson 4 " atkins VS. 27t
Dunlap; 27l
50 Cruikshanks & Co. VS. "a.
Campbell; Z.
90 Howell vs. Young; 2sl
81 Crooker vs. Harper;
81 Clark vs. Simpson; IS
I'd Week. Us.
% Fuller vs. Cram; p;
% Foster VS. Sunmerhil; 2S.
80 Harralsln VS. Bridge Co; Us!
96 Williams vs. vii on; 2Sl
81 Noel VS. Meredith; rs
IS Powers VS. Frank in; |2S
80 Scott, Baker 4 60. VS. IS
Bandy;
100 Wells a Campbell VS. Plan 30
ter's Bank;
101 Same vs. Bank Of Tenn; l29
102 White VS. Lucas;
103 Warren vs. Wilkinson:
104 Mayor 4 Aid. ex parte; 20
Ii Block & Co. VS. Railroad;
106 Brown VS. Foster; 20
! 1U7 alhoun vs. Brie 20
los E,tine VS. Egsu; I29
1C9 Mayor a Aid ex parte; 29
| III Rawlings vs. Ledlette 20
Ill Bowles 4 Bro. VS. Leake, 20
ct al; i29
| 112 GoOdbar vs. Same; $50
lib Baker 4 Chatham VS. 80
Same; 1870
ia Cheren VS. Same; 10
us Williams 4 McBath VS.
Same; $50
l16 Mc6avock, Or, VS. McGav-
ock, AdmT; $50
| III Page vs. HaR kins: 1870
| lis McGavock VS. Gum;
ll9 same vs. Mccann; 70
100 Same vs. Weaver; 80
12l Chudress vs. SIN I'll; 80
l22 Woodland vs. McGavock; i8l
1913 Duncan vs. BilbO, 81
1874 Evans vs. MAYS; I3t
125 Wells vs. Lawrence; 3l
126 Bank Of Nashville vs.
Smiley; 81
1aT A.
12S Stewart vs. Mt.0livet Gem; 81
129 Oyerton vs. Nash. Man 81
miciuring & o; 81
49, Owen v Warmath; ISL
1871 white vs. Blunkall a Co;
1872 Douglass vs. Anderson; 32
1873 Childress vs. Gum; ~
l3t Douglass vs. Jones;
1875 parham vs. Uley; 80
1856 Nicaol vs. Lucas; i8l
1877 Childre.s " Gum; 3g
13S Same vs. Rives; 10
lS9 Brady, German 4 Co vs. 8.
o Kane; 3.
40 Fort VS. StOthard; b.
igi Bank vs. smiley;