The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1857-12-24

SAFE 70 this city 70 the Of s2 S. and thai
TAI the amount is only ied once Correcting this error
and assuming that figures the Revlsory right
Amount Of apportionment from State SIPS $50 81
Tax Of 2oh Of one per cent a6o22 "a
called for by the Board of Education Ll26ols 90
Balance raised by Supervisors $3.50 e6 %
lm; fixed by saiute being 81 per scholar 52sss 70
Excess OF llml, called for ... .so2eas "A
Board Education being sc9ee2 81 the auho
regretted the Comptroller has only caused the
mate OF the Board 10 be returned under an allegation ths
to The Common Gonnc Rrevous such re
bounds without extending the Board Of Education,
@ o @ IL sr pu
ton of giving color 10 csmor against the Board Of Educa
he sn and Of the Of a CITY and
TO as persons for an ocer Of
na hsh rspaa 70 The ssses m nscs s
sariy sueectng he mputaon q least mpro
ydenc butt may not he as acceptable to eonderae citizens
TIE people Of this city and their children for countless
The Revisoy Board object item az sl2s 900 for
n h Sss @ s eIcseSns a ser .r =, ~
stated This item included in the estimate because in
iroer he supreme Court decided sacb could
Council Of that year authorized an dTance Of sl25co be
finally satisfied and The school revenue relieved from the
year The right o. the Board Education
and the whole amount claimed for the year was within the ii
imitation Of four dollars scholar fixed By The school law was
within Tie limit for that year by sum nearly three times
posed that such amount would, under the decision Be
mSSn = sm.d for az a s
Of the limit for the latter year As the Revisory Board
above tho limit "a roSaSy better PS % III The i pr
Sent claim on account q the deceney Of lisa, from 500
BssTS q Eaacaon allowed cali % Of
purpose q maintaining the validity Of ,ae estimate
for 1888 ont these views the committee
mend the adoption Of the following preamble and reso
whereas the estimate ofthe moneys necessary be raised
for The purposes authorized BY The Provisions Of the act en
various scs relative e schools Of the city New
pss and 9 Jed Sa the G board soSsed for hs
purpose by the 18th section q the ae entitled An act emit
April IL 1851 and he sad board have dsapproyed g the
same and returned ~ WIN 70 ne sfg ~ IN
abe Education and the said objections have also been
Rssoivsd That he hoard Or Education hereby Adhsres 70
m sad oTgns estimate 81 saemed % hs s 80 na
charter q The city q New York" passed April Il lss7
of he school moneys % 1855. NEE, the Necessary e.
penses Of the period hereby reduced from sl2eo
kssoysd That Ne estimate specified in The preceding rsso
lion aud s copy o. his rePS and
WIN eeThSA s sng ps sss snP nv yo a.
sPs & al he members Of *, board q Ed9caoS then
thereon BE- propers aaheaucad durcas and transmit
led ne Board DESIGNATED ~ Tie preceding resolution and
$500
- = "~'A s tESf.gSfSSsiSJl J. yk 1SnRiS
JOHN HOOPER, rinance
ALBERT SMITH, c.n.sa.as
GEORGE IL CLARK, ooin'n
RICHARD C. FELLOWS, J
The motion for ir adoption wa the occasion OF long
discussion.
Mr. GKJEy the President; arose and argued against is
beng adopted unless some important alterations were
made portions Of IT, He alleged TO one In particu
lar which related 10 Comptroller fagg's bringing the
finances Of the Board before the municipal
the language Of the paragraph which alluded 30 this
gentemans conduct ungentemany IN It's tone and that
II plainly charged the Comptroller with an Intentional
mii statement
length 70 Mr. Green, and In defence OF the paragraph
% which be made slusion. he believed the Language 70
he forcbe but not what Mr. Green had said OF and ne
Tlagr had made intentional m sstatement that Wa
never intended by the committee.
Osher Commissioners spoke on both sides, when al
length Mr. Waterbury expressed desire " the eject
that the argument should be brought 10 close and IN
thai there should be an agreement, possible,
srnonrst all the members of The Bard he was willing 70
make alteration IN the tone q the paragraph that had
been the cause Of 80 much debate
The alteration effected and the paragraph read but
Mr. Green stu said that was imperous and dictaiory
IN tone and moved that should be stricken out OF the
report altogether. The motion was seconded but lost by
. majority of - to The original motion IN favor of
fhe adoption 81 the report then repested, and
carried by majority q 81 for the Affirmative 10 for the
exposition. .
nr wArTunrRY then made a motion 70 the effect that
any surplus funds existed that they be set aside for spe-
srhed objects and 10 defray expenses The motion was
adopted
A resolution OF Commissioner nsvr~roRr, relating 10
cue 81 the by laws Of the Board, which imposes upon
female teachers the isgung duty 81 attending " schools
hoth morning and evening ocasioned much controversy,
which resulted In fts adoption.
hwas lastly moved that the report Of the Committee
Normal schools be adopted and the motion was unani-
mously carried.
The Beard then adjourned an next Wednesday evening