New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-02-23
GREAT BRITAIN.

in Parliament the b1sinees bad been 81 u's>e+
hneous cas-. Aftsr some deo.e the ADDRESS N rePy
TO The Queens speech was ssreed 70 sni pen 80 u
the usual form.
The f,,yvjpo e..Ysss give sn aotract OF the poins
Of most iDtere. % ID been befo:e Ell her Juse
DipI OH.1Ic RELATIONS WITH PERSIA.
TIE Esu OF ALBEN.RLE gave notoe TIA; Oh Mon
dsy he 10Th inst be viii move 10. return OF the 81 n
e1pen. I'd on 6ipom uc mss'oas ION ..e
10, n % 20 the yeaT 1914 inclusive and sso for
INN of The expeb,e ID uIed h} he Government. OF In
dia IN scooun Of he b Db legation y toe CoIr. OF
Pe,aa durpg be ls0t ye-', for which the ne aid
he I'm, i,hei His obiecs moving foe the re, IN VS.
u rjse the gu. si N wbeth ,. sem ba,bsroas ate
,rob az Perna, sboud be placed A. regarded diplo-
na.i, rebaiioDs, upon footing With toe ciSiaz III
Sta es of Ewupe; snd fl.are occ .eion b. ,ho I'd
rove tbs. the diplom ..io r. atoms bet~eep this
country aid Persis now suspended, ,houd no: be
newtd.
THE ATTACK on CANTON.
The Esyl Of ElLEsBoRoRGH ask ed the Earl OF C,G-
trdon whether he intended 10 lay upon the table of the
House any depoaions made by Thomas Kennedy,
sia'irg hinsef TO be the master Of the orchs taken
by the CbiDete authorities lie alec desired 10 kno~
whether the noble lord could lay upon the t.bs any
dispatch from the Government At home TO Sir Jobn
Bowrirg, authorizing hin to taEe favorable oppor'
tuDty TO obtain acctss 10 the city Of Canton.
The Earl Of CLAREEDoS s'ned that ihe depostions
of Kennedy are included in The papers sh CD be laid
upon the table on Tuesday night He attributed the
delay which bad taken psce in distributing the papers
among their ordghips TO the necessity Of crc llsng
with ibom msp OF the locatv where III. operations
bad taken place. With respect to the other questions
be had to ttaie that there bad been specific sruc
foIs relating 70 Canton given TO Sir j. Bowfing bu,
there were geLoisl Instructions dspasched TO him
pointing cut The deer ,bieness of 1tanog free access
10 the c;tiee Dsmtd the treaty and particularly
10 Canton. When Sr John 30 ~ripg arrived at Can
be asked the commissioner TO grant him an inter-
view but it was refused ard the only dispatch sent by
The government 10 Sir John Bowring was one APPROX
., g In hah had
The Eul Of ELLESBoRoCGH-Will you make any
motion on the subject
The Earl Of CLAREsDoS-At present il lie no. my
intention.
THE WAR WITH PERSIA.
The Esrl Of DERBY wish ed to know when the ps-
ptrs in relation " the with Persia would be lad
on the table.
The Earl of CLARENDON explained that the papers
were not laid the table because nesoti stions
perdiDg.
The Earl Of DERBY ssid be did not ask for any ps.
pes affecting the negotiations bat he aeked for papers
iuuso alive Of he motives which led the Goverom mt
into the war and of the manner in which it pro-
claimed. He very much struck with the powerful
statement msde on Tuesday night by Earl Grey
on the subject; and though be old not vote Wi Ii h
On the amendment, be disposed 10 concur in the
pjpciple be had laid down. because he thought the
mode in which the proclaimed was inoonsist-
ent with constitutional practice and usage Hear,
htMl.
The Earl of PETERBOROUGH asked whether the Gov
erDment would lay upon the table any papers llustrs
tive of the measures taken by the Government of 1n1a
when they received Information that the Persans
moving hostilely toward Iierat
The Earl of CLARENDON replied thst he would an
sv er the question a future day.
TIE POSSIBILITIES WITH CHINA.
The Earl of MALMEsBUkY referred TO the fact that
the opinion of Sir John B0wrtg respecting the desirs-
biity of obtaining access TO Canton differed from that
Of bis predecessor, Sir George Bonham, Who Es Of
opinion that the trade with Chna could be eff Ct
ualy carried on by EDgGshmen not eoteeiDg Canton,
whore they would be exposed to insult He lord
MalnesbuIy) hoped that the noble Earl would give
them the correspondence that had taken place on th.t
Limit j. be vnr 80 hecause he believer that the dis
patches Of Sir George BoDhain ~~.u "''0 o. on ANU
dote to those Of Sir John Bowring
The Earl Of CLARENDON spp.ehended that there
would not be the least objection TO give the pspers on
the point referred to.
tior to lay those papers The table II Necessary
for The right comprehe1 sion Of this important question:
that they should BE- in pOsseeeion Of the dispatches from
the date of the original conc u'on OF on t1e ter
nina ton of the former Chine 70 war. he hoped that
Lore Clarendon would also produce despatch whic,
be Earl Greg had write when in elise, prohibiting
the British local authorities at Canton from tAkin,
active measures without referring TO the G,vernnel'
at home ano which db patch he haa written after
having been in communication with the late Duke OF
Wellington.
LORD CARDIGAN AND 1.-THE STAFF OFFICER"
The Earl of CARDIGAN begged TO put QUESTION
to Lord Psnmure relative to the defamation of the
cha scter officers holding commissions in the army.
Before doing he must remind him how c'
we've changed with regard to the protection OF mans
character by he laws of honor. great AMI dis
tipRuibed men-the Duke Of Welingtoa-when he
considered be upusty reflects upon connection
with great poh al question, had the lave
of honor Previous to that similar course had been
adolted by Pitt, Fox, the Marquis a oncondery,
Canning Peel, sD0 by amost all thu great and dis.
iipguished men Of the past and present century,
without any fubst quent personsi feeling having
HA III vi nj had hAan
unfortunate when bumbly following in their psth
and had The misfortune to be placed at their
lore ships bar, and tried ss elon, at the imminent
INK Of losing not only his personal property but his
personal lbtity. The Law since that lime had become
more stringent and the result OF the OILY Personal con-
test tia, had taken place between two gentlemen In
the army WIS., that n them lost his co nmlsrlou
end was imprisoned. The Articles Of War hsd also
BE- en- made more stringent and severe on this point
and be- therefore. had found 1t necessary, when al.
ia, ked in the publication OF staff otcer, to apPe1
for protection to the Commander IN Chief. His pLo'd
Caroieaps character had been NAL tbs muigAfy
rbsrscisr had been detained il the most extra ordinary
and nest uncalltd for manner by an officer hodipS
commission in the service; AID although that officer
had published bis upfounced statement; under the
pane Of " a staff oficer, he EGS Well kno|n to be
Maier the Hon Somerset Col hospe, nearly connected,
he Loid Csrogan regretted to say, with member OF
their lordshps House There was not any nth 10 the
statements made by that officer ecii1g him lord
Caogsp except in ole instance where be sta ed tha'
nun Der Of horses had SOLE backs. When the state
nen,s in the work were made known to him, be re-
Qvested the Con man6Cr-i Chief TO bring ,jor 50
eiset Csl,horpe b. fore a General Court Martial
for conduct unbecoming tie character OF al
officer ard gen,lmsn, in disgracefully ina
Hgling his Lord Cardigan'sl character, bat t1e
Conn ar d.r-in. Chief refused TO aecede TO his
request on the ground that i, would be icconvoneo.
10 tie general interests OF the army He then sent -
.ior Cal horpe brother staff officer who hac ded
him (Lotd C4IdigaDl when employed ON service with
the light cavsby. That officer poated ont 10 Major
CalhErpe hon entirely uulounltd every Of az