New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-01-09
Gaze settled.
Case settled.


sURROGATE's CoURT-JAx s-Before A. W BRADYosp
In the matter of the Estate Of William Wright deceased
The SURROOATE.-Victor Barsalou, claiming to be
creditor 81 tLs ns 20. ss
that had ssAy advertised tor omsths too demand ia
.c.S and he he pp"s ns a.sts SUI" At Tor @
recovery within az months hsrsse the claim "s' b'"ed 81
The Revised statutes having provided convenient and sum
may method Tor tho AscesDGent of demands sgsin the
estate Of Jsesssed person months after tho Of ie
tes the executor may under the order Of the
hayns claims agsn the deceased exhibit the 10 tho
adni',sor within 'I month. from he day 81
The first publication Of such notice Whsn tho claim prosen
ed satisfactory vouchers may BIO demanded and sso the sdA
vii Of the claimant the dem and Justly due and shove
d, pa,m.nt and Offsets II the justice Of the claim DO doubt
tpooyed by The Surrogate Or il the claim disputed
ted Al tie sr shall not referred ths elansas
,ba within sI month. after such dispute or rejection .so
after part thereof sh, have become due eonmeness
suit Tor the recovery Thereof o. Be forever D.,'e a~
81 SCI These provisions udcous and they sfoId ready
d prompt mesns Tor the final adjustment Of estates The Pm
.iidn Of liz months within which creditor must bring hls
seton at law OF barred relates only 70 ths com
io are in ,aIps.t To- deernins wsshsr o. thsy via
resort legal proceeding. Beyond that period toe isw
way Of the distribution Of the estate snons other psiaes
whose Ishs are ungnesiioned 1t would osrsny % ss.e
10 suspend all creditors next Of hin and bs,tees hon.
,one ,ip,s claim hanging ike cloud tho whole
state and which the e.iant wa. 10 submit
to the decision legal tribunal consider the statute ther
row or ,te eon.acon For sT,mps the letter osls
e essdea then il applies simply iotons law and not 70
sSrossis Court fooi however % II: spirit Sas.nns s.s
iIt.I a. hesitation Ia holding that Is nnsloa
20 t Gc s b fo1s he Surrogate limited
actions law There no reASon Why on ssch p9,-
should b. rule Ia ous Court ana ah9shst els 10 -
Court sBd Of justice in place and smother IND AZ
,lr ee II was from analogy Courts Of Equity adopted tie
.,sau'e of usons applicable 20 legal demand. .na ~"
analogy am led 70 apply ne Proy'9n. " sso me sarroxsts
der 10 proceedings on claims Deiols ns
This leaves tie law consistent Harmonious and CHin'H
all lie depar'nonts Of scuinstrauon ,- .st,,. ma
onlr .tsfut ~
md he nan Difficulty consist 10 determining VIZ moi 70
claim IN question dsputed or rejected "a Sss.s
u q 1s issts , gA' s, ser the executor rsp,2
ihsi hs could receive It a. ci.in 1mSs
tory vouchers IN soPpoI ssreS h of tsas smoantss y
SCI So duly verified seoor@insJ inAas v1s y
lou sud presented n the executor "eo 90 vi 49,
,Se s..t. Of william Wright decss.s5 must rsecsl
sIoous tb,t you took b affidavit for the sn9ost 81
90 and gave him credit or s.id snolIs. 80 ~ IN ssss-
" @ The eorfecn.ss Of the AFFIDAVIT DO not object 70 -
sal SsD Are the words mast reject eontsaSSs Lie
81 insists that hey not and that they were -
90 intended and 70 sustain ne pct lon pm duI, re-
Py dated AP - 10 .sI,,n. %y ei.im slG ..
bot stating that you want 70 rslee. uy .Gs.yt spA
800, OF The Uoqtd th., ,s 90 .noant Howsves.
Re nature OF the Affidavit, and the nAaIs,.-
which received kes to iGei.', ;sgY proper
. ,.-ys Tor that amount" SUeseepees 70 te 80
49,, 80 ysIious between the 1880 Gos
september lB wi en- ne r Ia rrssrd = tha
Ii ..id have since you, eHeu. .,e b1oasAt -
psr,i.ly considered all the nsSuss oss ssaat
.sI%s 4 sas %aas I =. s9s: ss.
a.eOver az 'esson q, S n, April ssa .,. ~
letter 70 a a. .S have be. "a "a AN
~ ,ms of Bsr,soa' bl which ~ Hs 81 ssss4 vtynssS
| sses, bit the eonsovss5 fs'sss~ WV