Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-02-10
NOTICE.

T., g. NOTICE. H. -.
Talliaferro, and others, Complainants,> (
Patrick, and others, Defendants. -.
IN CIIANCERY.-
ITO Alexander G. Taliaferro and Agnes,
l. his wife, William Marshall, Mary NJ
Archer, Fielding I. Marshall, James F,
Jones and Ann L., his wife, John 7,
Smith ant Margaiet L., his wife, Thomas
Marshall, Eliza Marshall, p 3,cessert L. Dou-
that and Mary A., his wife. Mildred p
MARSHALL Jacqueline A. Marshall, Elliot
NJ. Baxton and. Ann NJ, his wife, Ellen
NM arshall, Jacqueline B. HOWE, Mary
HOWE Ellen Hewie, Anderson Wade and
Susan, his wife, w. NJ. HOWE. Ann. How
ir, Jno. Marshall, A. A. Marshall, Jas. E
Marshall, Fielding Douthat and Mary W..
his wife, Jas. X. Marshall, Edw. c. Mar,
shall, Jannet r. Harrison, Geo. D. Fisher
Lucy NJ. Norton, Edw. c, Fisher, N. G.
Kenney and Mary A., his wife, Mary
Fisher, Raleigh Colston, AnnF. Colston
James G., Paxton. Jas. w. Massie, B. j
Jordan, Samuel +. Jordan. George Fish,
er surviving executor of E. j. Canning
ton, decd, George +. Harrison, Edward
J. Harrison, Carter H. Harrison and
Henry Harrison plaintiffs, and Spicel
Patrick aud Virginia his wife, Aaron
Stockton. William Tompkins, Joel Shrews.
bury, William Dickinson, Samuel Steele
Robert G. Steele, John Alexander, Sam:
uel Alexander, Susan G. Thornton, Ann
NJ. Wilson, Barbara Wilson, Sally vii.
son, Ann G. Marshall, - Marshall
Emily Howies Mary Fisher, Lucy @
Fisher, Susan L. Colston, William S
Wilson, Betty A. Fitzhugh, Mary A
Harrison, MargaretsL. Marshall, Fanny
Marshall and John. Marshall defendants
in the above Ckancery suit: a
Take Notice, 90
That at the Fall Term 1856, of the Circui
Court for Kanawha Co. and State of Va.
decree was rendered in the above cause
ordering, among other things, reference
of said cause to John i. Mosely Esq, ;
Special Commissioner for that purpos,
appointed, with instructions to report up
on the title of the land mentioned in th,
Bill and sought to, be, divided and Parti
\ toned in. said cause, embracing the fol
lowing enquiries, To wit :: I'm IN
"lst. Whether the claim of title, I,
John Steele nineteen thousand five hun
dred acre survey, is correctly stated in th'
| Bill: ,...~s.S,..5is.ss 5.=''. y
2ud. Whether the several interests Q
the present owners OF said tract Of liant
are correctly aseertaiued and set out in tn
Bill. 2: -. \ ~ =.s..s, 4 n =
Sd. What is the interest Of each own
er in the whole tract? ol FsFrs..
4th. What is the interestof each own
er, 10 whom lot b., is assigned, in sait
lot B. IL H.. $3.50 7'ota.
5th. What is the interest Of each own
| err, to whom lots c.. and Fare assigned
in said lots G. and E.. ~ HI
9th. And that said COMMISSIONERS
port any such other and further matte
as to him may seem proper, or any Of th,
parties require"
And take notice, that 1haye fixedupol
Monday the 9Th day ofJanuary 1857 a
the time, and the Office of Parks ant
Mosely in the town Of Charleston Count,
Of Kanawha and state Of Virginia, as th
place, for complying with the forcgoin,
acquisitions Of said Decree, at which tim
and place any Of the parties who thin
proper may attend. vFaJl MT
- : JOHN L. M0SELY,
Special Commissioner.