New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-11-12
Ia W LNTEELI4ElgUE.


SUPREME cOURIye:stEaL TINY Nor ii-Bsf'e'
t. People the resion Of Wool Die ImeEe ,st the Gre
tor Aqueduct Soar.
% Oc'ohI 10 Judge PEABODY -erde-sd decision
5enyg the II th reistr cor .re.mus
tbessoss.t. them tbs contact for eossrucas
he - 81. r.i i.t j. eae IL the
pstns, Wood. Dc the day which tie deoscn usds
s:n SE y .ss ~ iei 81 re sn r.
sppo. te:ided BEFORE rio. q .s order
dswn ap he Bosd refa,ee receive them oisst
Subsequently, sa,yit Of one Of the firm Ct Psehnd
... TIE oeotI.1: had ben 1870 t. the :ot enc.
from being executed, whereby depOntu' N,
~ "a ana may In w eS s,d t o' .ns ss pSyeas ~.
the e.tcrs and fo the Board had rot taken
s %s o% Sly ID. ta e:
pr ceeep Of the Cotcn ard should 1e Be vacated aGd The
& r. R Rss'a Ia. Ssls s
in.tsss q al Pc ses rsqured. =. v..-.,r. ..
ms Bu.sd sn Asbes sSi @ the
Aqo.dps bo;c AID the Is.o; oppo..d the Ecsu on he
and that they could cot sPse 70 80 on Is soOn s. desired By
Before Juds. DAVIES
L The matter o. tbs habess corpus &c rrcd'e Az ss''s
The hearing IL this e saa,a which wa, begun at the
house Ju.se B.v.es coln=.d Wednesday morning
n i III c5ss c:; NJ sSs %. :. e
ing e .ts5ss ,hs fer. a: saols;
VINO Sa 81 q. s gave no
to reference but that he iss-rg the wrii
4 som. doubt Would consult with h. brethren it,
he desgnaos Mr. Hilton as the referee there 70 De- or
Thu poin. be used to decide soor n possible The ID
The stlsa squiIe he pene il this matter, at
the request Thomas Geoy Smith in behalf Of Acne Ssr
set ill., the Ct Alan Mcdonald to the writ Of hs
Fi, Hs dsn.. upon MA information and belief the. the
Bssett smith ct the time Of sing said ret am
b IL tbs charge Ct the said Allan Mcdonald pa
Second. That be ba' inowieise Information except
s1.h is derived from said to the manner which
the said ADne Bssset Smith va. on The 81 da OF Msreh
the application II Auquspe Smith, her brher the 5th dy
Of Navenbec 1887 fer wsrsrt before tive Justices CT the
menoIei in s.id return Ct the commitment Of the said
Bssset under said BY the overee Of the Poor
denies ssch and allegation relating thereto In
ssid Ietvr-.
ondy in The return Of ID. Allan Nc Donald sufficient IN
Law justify him tsd mcDorae n retaining tie charge a1t
benefit objection he bad specifically demurred u said
ret Urn in that respeet 80. .,,., ar.
opoy said he that the commsnced
urdcrs,ood and Known By the said Allan Melon
OBJ made for the hsbess In this ms,ter s' ssd
proOesdDss were wholly OK p.te s.a no opPoaani VI.
20 contest the san that his nfornsti and belief the
p sic satisfied Of the condten Of the asd Amaze
The ,PrtttatioI' made 70 tan y the .s Allan ns
not conclusive 0po the said An9e nor upon tins pete
Any bar ssas injury IA her beha In regard TO Fer a.
Ts He denies. upor hi. irforu,cu Ard belief that said
Bs,ss at the time Of said return OF nov insane
he. own person o. Ito per.en OF property
Of others permitted 20 s large o. tba: he Is, tc' eses
FRS, placed in he institution referred &c ir the
Srh That IT, upon the 5th day Of November 1881 che said
Smith luna.io insane perso1 thsn be ehiss
thai sncs that time she has become SAFE Ard tse,e0Is now
Norenbe- II 1887.