M'arthur Democrat. (McArthur, Vinton County, Ohio) 1853-1865, 1857-05-14
Court of Common Pleas, vinton County.

Court of Common Pleas, Vinton County.
John S. Hawk, Plaintiff,
against
George A. French and Civil Action.
Thomas b. Davis,
Defendants.
THE said defendant, George A. French, whose
i residence is unknown 10 the plaintiff, (but
who is supposed to reside in the State OF New
York, } will take notice that the plaintiff, John 5.
Hawk, OF the county Of Vinton in the State Of
Ohio, did, on the 80th day OF April, 1851, nle his
petition in the Court of Common Pleas, within
and for the County Of Ninton, in the said State OF
Ohio, against the said defendants, George a..
French and Thomas b.. Davis, setting forth, that
at the March term, 1855. Of the Court of COMMON
Pleas, of the County of Perry, and State of Ohio,
the plaintiff, John s. Hawk, recovered q judg-
ment against the said defendant, George A..
French, for the sum Of $3.50 OF, and costs Of suit,
that said judgment remains in full force unpaid
and unsatisted, that afterwards on the 10th day
Of February, 1851, execution was caused 10 be Is
sued by the plaintiff upon the said Judgment, and
that on the nth day Of February, 1907, the said
execution was returned by the Sheriff Of said
County ofPerry, mo goods, chattels, lands or
tenements, found wherein to levy;n that said def
endant, Geo A.. French has no property real or per-
sonal, subject 10 execution, but that he owns q
certain equitable interest i'm the following describ-
cd real estate, situated in the County Of Ninton,
in the State ofOhiO, heretofore purchased by said
George A. French Of his co-defendant, Thomas
b. Davis. which Of right ought to be subjected to
the payment of the plaintiffs said Judgment, 10
wit The undivided \ part Of out Lot No
22, in the Village of Macarthur, in said Ninton
County, save and except the Grave Yard Lot sit
uated in the Northeast part ofsaid Lot, and the
right Of way previously granted TO the ). q j.
V. Rail Road Company ; Also the one undivi-
dcd 4 part of out Lot No. 90, in said Village
and County, save and except the right OF way
previously granted TO the 5. d ii. V. RAll Road
Company !. Also the one undivided a part Of
in Lot No. S. in said Village Of Macarthur; Also
the one undivided x part Of four acres OF
ground, more or less, in said Ninton County, ly-
ing South of and adjoining said out Lots, Nos. 29
and 20, and bounded on the East by lands now
owned by Charles Brown, on the South by lands
now owned by Owon Dowd, and on the West by
in Lot No. ll2, las Numbered and designated on
the plat ofsaid Village Of Macarthur } and on the
North by said out Lots, Nos. % and 23; that
said sale from said Davis 10 said French was evil
denced by a title bond dated some time in De-
cember, 1856; by the terms (which the said Da-
Wis agreed to convey said premises in fee simple
upon the full payment Of the consideration mon
ey, that said consideration money (as plaintiff
is advised has been paid by said French o said
Davis, but that the said Davis still holds the
gal title ofsaid premises.
And praying that said Thomas B. Davis be
compelled TO answer and set forth, whether any
and what part Of the consideration money fol
said premises sold by him to said French, is now
due and unpaid, &C., and that an amount may be
taken under the Judgment and order Of sale
Court, of what is dne ifanything from said Georgi
A. French to said Thomas L. Davis, that all
and singular ofthe said premises may be sold un'
der the order of said Court, and thatthe proceeds
after satisfying tho just demands Of the sale
defendant, Thomas b. Davis, in this behalf, ma!
be applied to the discharge of the plaintiffs sale
claim, and for other proper relief.
The said defendant, George A, French, is fur
ther notified that he is required to answer tn,
said petition of the plaintiff on or before tn
third Saturday after the Eleventh day Of june
1857,
By CLARK e PLYLEY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
NAV :, 1857. We.