New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-07-01

o. -
rad = = b. q, :, no o. o,,,a;r H..
she .'ps. nef "''"ef ser' II her de'2 besso'e On"
once s ss~ iseis, 49,, .h.,.. h.. -. do
-, 80 .o,, up6 ~ wy ""''"'' WE " "" "s'e'' WV
She ds not os.,rs wh.'.ss bad her s., .s "a
she did ipow bad some name TO IL bot sac s., ssS
po,nfyLo,fy
She dor no, know whs,he. she di ., di no. ..sy
10 She de-. not remember that "a. testified tina. the tim.
on. bad received M. es.s b.r- no .esi,sn or ob,-ta
| ton in
II sh. doe, no. remember ,b. Oh. testified that abe seq
| {, . M nth or two before the Doctor. death
r. She ees no, remember that she testified whether IN.
base had wiring on the bach or not
AUGUSTA CrSsiNGHAns Ie1,nony b.torr me S"'ro-
gofe on ne n'f''e q me Pnbmc hdm'n'1ro'1 "
sell HeJ~mf,e, mMcn II. lSH.
.n.n.,, IA DE-! Ds ~, ~, ro,h.r ia
Sb. IA Know wba, .s.s h. and does no mention that
her mother called II agreement o-s srn 70 b.
any confusion between thsn
she doe, ths '', wns 'ne read over oe sss
& b.s, Us ~, s ,se ,,a o,., month o.,
| ,so before the Doctor, drsth
leH the 3; room imm.di.,ely
mother .sDd. hsl to ,sis !, ou o% os p.os tai .ss
| lyinl on her burrsu.
The lease 'd' signed with the Doctors and hT ""s''
| NOME, .-.,,,..
b ,ess the is.as bort time S1oss tbs Dsc,r. Death
TO- She also testified that the las, time she Rad the l.s.s
| there was o slis ration oblsers,ion in ~.
the the, Doctors death n. -.
i; Sh .,ssS minrtsl, And sra,Iy 10 he s,,Ss.i, sf
the lease.
| AUGUSTA CUNsIsGHAs's Iestlmony al toe Inquest,
Feb 7, 1857.
Augusta did not know whether her mother hsd es.e
:; Sps uIu unoe''ane us. - - t "a ss'e""' "
b s5 S So rSeb.P Sr T mssss
She never thought snythins ABOUT tne "''
she prv-r asked we qusssosi ,,. 49,. ...x B.. -.
=" ',c w.. 80 sn;,s 49, ~ " ~ ''
Her mother neref told her she bad ls.se ,..,.
her mob, never informed her and never curiosity
n ano. rursn Ts5 1', wear '
Toura, nmosd testimony nj some length ilustrot.
ng those positions, and continued Nov what apology
could be made for those contradictions Would %
Tb ,.t;mo nv of the Recsrder forbid such an excuse
as that. All through, from beginning to end. PLAIN
pa,psble direct contradictions, under circum-
stances that implied knowledge and exhibited desisu.
were TO be found surrounding the history Of this
rage clustering round il as thichy as grapes upOa
small stem-if in nature there were ever so many
prApes clustering round stem the fabricaons that
hung around this story There was an old maxim,
that fmm one we would jnige ALL but this might be-
,,,ars.J ord from all udv,no one thew might we'll
reverssu' ahu' Hull a, n ,hs, .L; sI,aasd mar
. .ne - uo hv tho Ienrosy OF 1ies was
;tS5e' fhr;cs,;o, No human life M r;vate
n nrem wonId be safe. If testimony such as
hn.pFnst: Cnnn;robams we're received in Cont Of
s,;ce II would strike AT the yery structure of hu-
nan socetv A case whoss only witness in respect to
I i: J - Lnow.Jcs ,v. tbu. sefimneacbsd
une s QUO TO- casa tsslf Such ner;ury such
Il truth hut
alsehood was not put 'Sfwsfa 70 saPpoH sud ahs
70 sustain an ahegau laise Do n;, H. III 90 80
g'e , anu rsast;xed Inv the a,socstious that
"n,rnurdeJ II
s",io""" N ,,, A.. c,, .a;o,,xn.5 D., IA
IL oe'"s ~ o0o'A' '"' "'"'' "'~
o'clock to day.
- ,.,. -, ILL. ,..w..x.
| SUPERIOR CoukI-June S;-.oe'o' 'u's' 'o'"'''"
| , g.. +. .., s., 49,. .h,Si,s sn,;n . marty from oro
Sns in anti in another Court Of the State having esas
power to giant the relief soo.L, by the complaint which
| such injunction is asked c.,..
IN '"sn Ss py ~ ,tbe, therein by an iniuncos
ina com another Court of coordinate powers and he
prosssd Notwithstanding such injunction, his proceedings
will not be Get aside for tia, cause as 'tgsiay,
But IN iutheranes OF Jgshcs tns parry h, ~ %
VIII De a. ~ tSs injunction 40 far a. Il NAV
interfere with the further prosecution Of such action
| Bennett sst L. Roy o,.,
| This action was commenced about the "a OF feoIu-
airy, 1851 upon contsct OF deendant 20 Psy 70 .nc
plaintiff certain annual sum for lifs In quarterly
Judgment having been entered for want Of answer
vacated on defendants motiSn on the an st %
on Sn", .n,w n%u on tenns e'" " ~ ~ r"'
On the oath Of April, the defendant commenced an
riot is complaint contained allegations which
entitle lie Roy to judgment that the contract on
which this action is brought be declared to be void,
In thu, cownlaint other allegations are contained
which. Lee Roy insists eptte him to further judg,
ment, that the present plaintiff re-eonvey to hun
conveyed TO the plaintiff. lie Roy, on that complaint
ord o,ber naners obtained an Injunction from Jus-
tice the Supreme Court, enjoning the plaintiff in
this action from further prosecuting the same until tho
further order of the Supreme Court. ,.s,.,.,
on n b Of srd on or the dsy
was exhibited TO her attorney herein
On the 18th of June, inst, judgment. was again
entered I'D ns ACTON rpl .ne Ptan , ~, o ""un