The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1857-09-12
NOTICE.


| and others for Cecil county
vs. In CIanctry
william liam aGgan, Jr' September 8'h 1857.
VE'lIE object Of this suit is to procure de-
L. cree Tor the sale of certain real estate il
Cecil county, known by the name Of 50 White
lock S Discovery" III the possession Of Will
lam Logan Jr. one Of the defendants for the
payment of the purchase money which remains
| unpaid and due TO complainants on a certain
article OF greement filed as an cXhibitin this
cause.
The bill states tint Tnomls BnrnSid.s
one Of the defendants in the year 1880 pur-
chased from Samuel " Whitclock an in
trrGst OF two sevrnths Of said land, and uf-
terrarinG Il portion Of the purchase money
TO said Whtclock. was indebted for the res
idue on 'wo several proniSsory notes payable
TO said Whitcl0ck, in the sum Of fifty dol
lars each. That said NhitcluoE in consider
alton thereof delivered t. said BurnsideS an
agreement by which he bound himself to
make title to said Burnsidcs for said interest
on the payment Of said notes that said
Bur"sides was also sliced Ola moety of said
land by virtue of Il deed Of Conveyance frual
one Robert Archer and wife. and being so
seized and possessed Of said land the said
Burnsdas in the year 1877 by his agreement
in writing with sud William Logln Jr.
agreed to sell his interest to said Logan for
certain fish barrels, which said Logan agreed
to deliver to said Burnsiaes, and or the de
livery Of two hundred Of said barrels, as in
said agreement stipulated, said Burnsidcs
gave peaccable possession to said Logln Of
said land as viii appear by exhibit b filed
in this cause. The bill further states that
afterwards, in the year 1913, the sud Barn
sides conveyed to compantnts his interest
in said land and also ASST gned to them all his
interest under and by virtue OF his agree
with said Logan. That Logan has Failed and
refused to deliver the residue Of the barrels
to Burnslcs or the compliments or any
money ia satisfaction thereof, but that the
remaining HStNimentS with interest thereon
are due to compliments. That the said
Samuel W. Whitclocii has departed this life
nteStltc. leaving his children Susan y.
Whitclocll, Emily Whitrlocil and Samuel r.
Whitelock Of the city Of Baltimore, his heirs
at law, that said Samuel Il. and Emily arc
iulants. and one James l.. Sutton OF said
city administrator OF his personal estate,
and that the said Thomas BUlnsides is still
indebted to the estate of 5 lmuAi Whi'elock
dec d.. for the full amount Of said prouisOry
notes and interest; an amended bill fled in
said cause also states that since the COM
mrncrmcpt of this suit the sail Susln A.
WhitelocIl has intermarrieI with one Ilaml-
ton Ring. who is n necessary party to this
suit, and that said Ring and his wircare non
reSidccts of this state.
1t is Therefore adinlged and ordered that
the complainant by causing II copy Of this
order to be asserted in some newspaper pub
lishcd in CeCil county once a week for onc
month before the thirteenth day of October
next, give notice to said absent defendants
of the object aud substance OF this bill and
warn Them to appear in tbs court in person,
o: BY solicitor on or before the fourteenth
day of January 1853 to answer the premises
and show cause If any they have why u de-
cree ought not to pass are prayed.
II. II. MITCHELL, Clerk,
True copy. Test.
II. II. MITCHELL.
Sent. u DIV. Clerk.