Arkansas true Democrat., 1857-11-03
The Authorship of Iackson.
TO MR. FLETCHER-FINAL.

difference between a communication apd editorial; you ask us to oba'u from Gen, V because he is our friend, denial that be .. the Jackson articles.
 We will not gratify your curiosity, asa TO part of your business to know. ItsDom ter to us what are the coqjecttres of voursay, any one else concerning the autborshin o, communication in our paper, as We do not w. communications for our own paper; wb1o consider it an insult for an editorial an,o, therein to be attributed to any one save ons. every editor is supposed to write bis o editorials.
 In regard to Gen. Yell's friendship wal known him about one year, during this tina have asked and obtained from him some sE, favors, which has been the case with rss every one who has lived about Pine BIuffI but we do not desire to trouble him with disputes. But you, Mr. Fletcher, have k1o, the Gen'l five times as long as we havee have, no houbt, received at his hands len in as many faUorS, therefore we suggest that, call to see him and obtain from him a by7ef nal. The Gtnl's house is directly on street leading from your residence to yourpr, ing office and you can very conveniently on him and obtain the desired denial hope you will do this. In the meantime not be restless, for you shall have strongerd0 on federalism to swallow than those given Jackson
 The above is the ans,oer O of the Pine B. Democrat to the of rspeated and never das charges that Gen. Yell Is the author of rotaie articles which appeared in that paper oyera signature of Jackson. Is not the answer ab and dashng denial? Does it not drive con petely to the wall our gOH1dIess impeachmg of the democracy of the Democrat? Hereaf: we will be more discreet ill our charges. Ser ouslv speaking, from the above IS there uoJ any doubt, if doubts were ever entertained, tn the Democrat with professions Of democac flying from its mast head, Is yet under k. | influence? That it actually permits the mo- ' distinguished Know Nothing in the S,a'e make its columns the medium through whi. to visit his raucor and spleen against the eu nent members of the democratic party who. ! the people have clothed with positions of nolo and trust? We perfectly 'uuderstand the ~ ference letweeu au editorial and commune. tion;' but really we are at loss to 'inas why the Democrat should,tear YasSioa lu tt thousand tatterS at the slightest lntmatou tt. Gen. iIem pstead, adenlocrat, had written au e. torial in is columus and under the charge tn. 1 Yell, a KHolg NothjnG was the author ot t ! Gtical communication, takes It quite cooi al retorts that we have a great deal ot cunosH!- boldly denies that llemp>tead, a ade1aocfat, wr an editorial but observes grave like slle- when charged that Gen. Yell, tue k. \. cl didate for Governor, was the author ot J Jack,a There is a refinement of distinction about e which we do not uudesta We had l. curiosity" to know whether Gen. Hempsie. wrote an editorial, yet the Democrat Was qUi willing to thrust on us the Information that did not write one. Will the Democrat by, cOndescendiug to thrust on us information mt Yell case as he was in the Hampstead case, abC which we had no curiosity? A supple den. iu one case is as easy as in the other; but he au inSuperabe barrier presents itself, our ueis bor we believe to be man of strict truth, a as Gen. IeH dd 'Crite political articles ,n htS Pl he would not be guilty Ul the violence toI conscience or his iute gritty as a man to put record a deliberate lalsehood. We are flu. alive to the delicate position his indlscret has carried him, and this affair has taught h a wholesome lesson by which he will endeay to profit, and hereafter if Gen. Yell wishes write he will do 50 on the very siY. We, t
 
 cries aloud iu the agony of grief Final" doubt from the depths of hlS heart the Dem crat wishes there had never been 6egiHat The Democrat in two successive Issues haS o that we were anti-demoCratS Convict the terprse of allowing K. \. politicians to WI political articles on rotation; do this eXpreS or by implication, and we will haul down democratic flag and retire from editorial Il with iufamv, as we ought iu such case. Int above extract the Democrat threatens us " lC0rse doses than Jackson. The Democ heralded the communication of Jackson V an immense flourish of trumpets and eXhau ed the beauteous field of eulogium for app priate rhetorical figures to express its vault admiration of the super. human ability and u, riant eudowments of Jackson. Kindred she in the office seeking interests caught the e, and waited the name of Jackson into regt , where fancy never betUre~soared And | , the Democrat threatens Us with "stronger , ses'' after the iuhctious ot Jackson, the Vt Materia Mcdica of politics. Oh. for coll Oi physicians to sustain ourseli during this ord , proposed for is. But Jackson Is our fam f physician and we are not willing to yield , up for new and uutried oaes What has , come of Jackson any way? Why did he suddenly retreat from the field of his fame
 We have not hear of him since it was hiu
 that possibly Gen. Yell might be Jackson Can't the Democrat arouse him to one m effort ere the wave of oblivion closes over hi
 Poor Jackson. lie must suffer the fate of great writers Blaze for awhile in dazz lishtaud go down in ght Df oblivion. F very few writers survive the plaudits of
 hour and we suppose he must snare the G mon tate.
 A n tnut', brrI. m1iS- ftl.