New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1857-07-27

quite as sound as those Of Virginia and we b zard
nothing in saying that they true and as sound
as Gov. Cobb, or as Jacob Thompson himself, upon
whose political escutcheon (,ce mean Mr. THonpsonl
not breath OF suspicion or dstrust has ever been
| cast
| Other Democratic papers in North Carolina take
the strongest ground against Walker, and conse.
quently against the administration which sustai1s
him, but we cannot now find room for further ex-
tracts.
So far as our knowledge extends, the entire Demo.
cratic press OF South Carolina inveighs bitterly
against the infamous Kansas treachery of Walker in
which he is endorsed by President Buchanan.
| The Sumter Is c. Watchman, discussing the
Kansas question, says:
! Since the above was penBed, we think that indca
tons and developments, sufficiently clear and full
have reached US 10 leave the matter longer in I'M
certainty as regards the position of Mr. Buchanan and
his administration with reference to Walkers Kansas
policy. 1t is now but too palpable that the Federal
Execntive-the WISE the just, the conservative and
constitutional standard bearer the Democratic party
the political prince of Cincinnati constitution and
eleyation-he i'll whose praise and at whose election
but a short time since, eNultant shouts were borne
upon every Southern breeze has betrayed the South
has endorsed Tue traltorous outrages of Walker tC
| wrest Kansas from the South and deliver it over
bound hand and foot to the myrmidons of Abolition
dom.
Speaking of the endorsement of Gov. Walker by
the administration, the Cheraw Is c. Herald
says:
lis some qualification, however, to know thai
while MIR. Buchanan seems to be placing ne,r con.
struction upon the Cincinnati resolutions, or else
abandoning ground taken only secure his election
portions of the Democratic party are regulating his
construction and rebuking both him and his double
faced Governor for their deserton of the principles
upon which they rode into power. Georgia and Mis-
sssipp have but led the way in which we expect tc
see the whole Southern wing of the Democracy fol-
low. For this they are said to be unsracious. >
The most ungracious thing can imagine is to see
men carried into power because of their professions
of fidelity and sincerity and when they have gained
all they sought after, turn upon their friends and
benetactors to heap upon them injuries and insults
such as these After securing their elevation to
power and place by such vile deception, and then
teacherousy use that power crush those who have
conferred it upon them, they think it exceedingly
ungracious' to be reminded of broken pledges and
violated oaths.
The Charleston Is. c. News says:
The administration and Walker.-The telegraph
now announces that the administration actually ap
proves, instead of disappearing, it previously re
ported, the course of Walker in Kansas, and thinks
orsooth, the Georgia and Mississippi resolutions I'M
gracious This news if it be true does not take US
by surprise as there was no confirmation of the first
report, Walker persistedly asserted that he fol,
lowed the instructions OF Mr. Buchanan, as all the
Democratic Northern press were gracously smiling
at the prospect of Kansas becoming free State.
The administration approves? Does this mean Mr.
| Buchanan or the Cabinet, which Southern nationals
boasts have in it four Southern men to three North
ern or the whole eight, inclusive of the President
assuming to embody the opinion of their party the
National Democrats? Did Mr. Cobb give casting
vote in favor of party, against the South and bis
own State?-if not, will he of Georgia, Thompson
of Mississippi Tourney of Virginia. and Brown o.
Tennessee, submit to Walkers violation Of the Kan
sas organic act of the rights OF the Territorial gov
ernment and of those of the South?
this the banquet of treacherv which the Soutf
was invited, when it was seduccd by political deusoI
into the National Convention OF a party which lends
all its power and influence to prevent the extension
and protection OF Southern institutions and in WHOSE
national caucus the Democracy of the North held
and will hold, a controlling majority! Was it fo
this that South Carolina herself was put in party
limbo by her national politicians?
We have already published articles from the othe
Charleston papers denouncing the Buchanan-Walker
Kansas policy. If Mr.. Buchanan was candidate 70
reelection, we Go not believe he could carry pre-
cinct in the State, deep seated is the feeling o
Indignation against him.
1t is well known that the Democratic State Conveu
ton of Georgia demanded the immediate recall @
Walker-that Judge Brown, Democratic candidat
for Governor of that State unqualifedly sanction
the proceedings of that Convention-and that its
ton is sustained by the people generally. We sha
republish few specimens of Georgia thought an
action.
The following is the resolution of the Georgi
Democratic State Convention alluded to above:
Resolved, That the inaugural address of Governo
Walker, in prescribing the terms on which Congress
should admit Kansas into the Union, and in attempt
ing to dictate the submission of their constitution TO
ratification and to what class of persons constitute
a presumptuous interference in matters over which h
has no legitimate control and that the same address
in expressing his Official opinion that Kansas woul
support that side of the question: is gross deparur
from the principles of non-interventon and neutrait
which were established by the Kansas bill and Mi
convention has full confidence that Mr.. Buchanu
nil manifest his fidelity to the principles ,chich
7ied him into office by recalling Coz. Uaiker.
The following is taken from the letter of Judg
Brown accepting the Democratic nomination 70
Governor of Georgia, under date Canton, Ca, Jul
g. 1872
have examined carefully the platform of prin
ciples laid down by the conxeuton, a copy of which
you did me the honor to enclose, and | have no hest
tation in saying that the principles adopted by tn
convention command the appreciation Of my juds
ment and DW TeceiUe my cordial support
In speech delivered by Judge Brown in the tow
of Canton Cherokee county, Ga, on the It'll of JUL
he said, according to the report Of the Atlanta Elk
aminer
He went at some length into the history of TIN
Missouri compromise, and of the course taken by tn
Northern States in refusing to extend the line to h
Pacific ocean, and to carry out the compromise il
good faith. He said the restriction contained in tina
act had been repealed by the kansas-Nebraska act
and had also been declared unconstitutional by thu
Supreme Court of the United States in the bred Scot
case. The people had sanctioned the principles 0
non-intervention contained in the kansasNebrask
act. They tcere the true principles, and upon then
Mr.. buchanan hud been eiecated to the Presidency
and that he believed that the President would still
adhere to them and carry them out. Justice, to sa
nothing of gratitude TO the South, required this at hi
hands. He regretted to see that Gov Walker, 0
Kansas by his late inaugural address and his Topeka
speech, had disregarded those principles, and ha'
attempted By the exercise of his official influence
turn the scale against the South. The Governor, il
his opinion, should not have uttered word kansa
for against slavery; nor should he have done any
thing to influence votes one way or the other, bl
! should have left the people as the Kansas bill LEI
them perfectly free to form and regulate their domes
tic institutions in their own way.
The Columbus (Ga) Times and Sentinel, in it
issue of the 18th inst, sternly .rebukng the Wash
ington Union, says:
"TuE EXTREMISTS OF TIE SoUTu."-Such is til
designation coyertIy applied to the Democracy
Georgia and Mississippi, by the illnormed, and, a
we suspect the inexperienced editor of the Washing
ton Union, for the course they have fit to tax
! on Kansas affairs Now, the Democracy of Georgi
are not extremists are not sectionaiists, not d
turbers of the public peace, but true and loyal n;
tona Democrats anxious for the success Of til
administration and devoted to the principle OF nor
intervention by the Federal Government, in all il
branches, with slavery in the territories 1t Is tals
therefore IA charged by the Washington Union, thu