The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1857-01-16
Supreme COurt-Circult.
Before Hon. Judge Roosevelt.

Supreme Court-Circutt.
Before Hon Judge Roosevelt.
ACTION F0s AssAULr-HOw DoNEsrrcs CREATE
DIssENsIONs AMONG NBI0HBORS.
JAN. lS.-Joseph Bradley Robert ). Ghese5oroah.-
Ehs was action for alleged assault appears that
che parties are near neghbon In East Twenty eighth
e:reet and some caculies between them In o.
sober 1884, consequence Of the tale bearing Of
want In the employ of the plaintiffs father. After stsn.
ing the tais Of the domestic Mr.. Bradley sat down
s. ind.e letter to his neishbor, and directed his 20
(ths plantin) to copy Il, and send Il to Mrs Chesebo
rough On receipt Of the epistle Mrs. Chessbogoug
worry properly handed to her husband who forthwith,
went to the house OF Mr. Bradley, and in Interview
Nth Mrs Bradley asceraned that her husband wrote
bitter and desired her son to copy it, but she could not
~ whether the one then in possession OF Mr. CHEESE
borough was In the handwriting Of her husband The
DanGf came up during this conversation, and the de-
ndan. asked him II he had written tha, letter. but be-
tbre he bad time TO reply Ar seized him, alleged,
The mother Of the plaintiff oeposed to these facts but
would moi admit that the letter was in the handwriting
Mr Gerard read the letter. a. justification Of the act
OF tina defendant, which he submitted was mare
shaking Of the plaintiff BY the collar and no;
charged the Cheseborouxhs with speaking dlspAr.
ss Bradley. and s them a NJ: ss
with them, and set forth ion the Information Of Ary)
that though hs Cheseboroashs pretended 10 be Q. init
shOusht Then came Description Of the dinner table Of
Ss sss .n On O.:
OF upper tendon etiquette n table, N smother time there
s s As2 s
roughs had no right 70 hold higher head than their
Mr. Gerard said that that letter constituted their de-
feacs.
Mary Ce.xy, the domestic being called By the plain
tween Er Ghese6oroush AMI Joseph Bradley sas Vi. on
the head f the stairs Mr. Cheseborough asked Joseph
WAS be who wrote The letter but before ne bad I'm, to
acreamed and ran swsv; was her opinion that Joseph
WAS ssassless sft<r Mr.. Cheseboro agh let him 90.
NJ ChAfed offered to prove the truth OF those state
ntn contained in the letter. aud which she had
municased TO NJ. Bradley Collected 10 aud ruled out
fendsHs nay have bad against Mr. Btadsy the eldor he
right assa the lad then only Is years OF age
who merely acted - an smanuenss Of his father.
Verdict for plaintiff $50.
EJECTMENT SUIT.
Zsllah Pun Somnel II Plah and ohers-ThS action
Of eectmeut was brought by 'Ae psnt to recover the
Seenth ward this city, and Aso damages for
Withholding from her. The defendants deny her right
70 the possession Of such aSd or any damages TOT tas
that the plaintiff, Zllah Punt Is the widow OF kiohae;
Punt decsased and that his mother ct the time OF her
death Of the property In question She LETT
three children. and two dauehters-Ml Michael,
Exsbeth and Hannah, each Of whom entitled 10
Tns osusa Who = an actress a. the Bowsry theatre
duripg tbs lifetime Of the mother, married Michael, By
which marriage there were however no children. lie
by deed conveyed this properly 70 Mr. Mclaughlin tas
brother the plaintiff who subsequently, conveyed TO
the plalnrG this action, by whch the psind claims
title a owner without any actual being paid
On the part Of the defence II was commended that thesd
decide were procured and executed by Michael Pant
through improper and undue licences being exercls
over him and were therefore, void. and 10 sustain this
view evidence WAS produced BY hessrs. SANFORD And
Bngs shelving that oonsi Iteration was paid Tor those
dsees 10 nchsel Punt; that his mind was very
weak; tast he was tho subject OF ridicale u
the Fa..on market, where he bought and sold
cranberriss, which no carried around the street
in q haudcart and sometimes In q b@ket, for living
that the boys hcoted al him, calling him crazy hok
foo sh Nick and other ncknames AID that be and al
wife lived unhAppy together which evidence being pro
duced the defendants counsel contsnded thai no va
under undue influence when those deeds wore exc
cuted that they vold and that the plaintiff had
therefore legal title 70 the property, and ought mol 20
recover Il stated BY the counsel that before IN
commencement OF this suit tho dover right o. the plain
al had been offered 70 her, which she refused.
SPECIAL TERN.
Before Hon. Judge Clerke.
Jan Is ne Late Cowxmp Cdse-ydrd o. weir RI
Horace Dvesr.-An order Of commitment for oontsmps
70 be nsued unless the defendant submits to Judge Dh
vies' order on Eve days notice and pays the costs