Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-09-22
Nj. Burhauan aud ths Administration.

VA ~ - 49,
WI have never known d more wanton
attack upon All Administration than the
one now being made By THE Know Moth
|ing papers of Georgia against Mr. Buch-
Iaran iii reference 70 the Kansas Walker
matter. They charge that tho President
Ehas nn;ted with Gov. Walker 10 make
Kansas 1 free State. OF TIE truth Of this
charge not ono particle NJ evidence Is
pretended IL Be produced! The charge.
Is made and repeated, and this seems 70
be considered bt che opposition editors
Dis proof of its truths That it utterly
false and destitute II. even yhe semblanee
Of truth, IS satisfactorily shown by every
word and act Of the President since he
came into office.
Was be attempting To make Kansas q
free State when liz declared that the peo-
pie Of the South had i right 70 60 with
their slaves into Kansas, and that neither
Congress nor the ne Iritorial Legislature
had the power TO prevent ftE
Was he attempting 4. make Kansas g
Efree State whea hb appointed 3 Southern,
man GoyernoF 81 that Territory? and
that Southern maA ,the-one who had been
recommended to him BY The extreme men
of the South for the highest Office ia his
SGabinet2 EI
Was he attempting to make Kansas d
free State when hs filed 9H the other oil
lees there either with Southern men or
Northern National Bemocs4ts, aceeptas
bic to the SOUTH
Was he attempting to make Kansas q
Tree State when III dilected the whole
military po@et7of Die United States % bc
used, il necessary, 10 enforce the pro-
slavery Territorial laws Of Kansas2
Was he attempting TO make Kansas Al
Tree State when h9 directed the army 70
Ibe called QUITO put down lin Lame and
the other aboliteuists of Kansas, who
refused to obey the laws 81 the Territory
because slavery WIS protected by Them?
Was he attempting TO make Kansas q
free State when ~ delivered His inaugur-
al address, and gate his instructions to
Coy. Walker, wiierein he annpunced doc
~triaes which have received the candid
approval of the en - southern country?
Wt.s he attsm to make Kansas a
fres State when look into his Cabinet
four Southera men and three Northern
Dem ulto had beeh sacrificed in
their States on account OF th4ir devotion
TO the Constitutional rights b Ithe South?
The record III MIR. Buchanan on the
subject OF the rights Of the South stands
without a parallel III the political history
Of our country and to see and hesr such
ii mar denounced asa traitor 10 tie
South and unworthy Of her confidence
rand support, y the highest evidence 81
the blindness and folly Of bigbtted parti-
zans. Ii Mr.. Buchanan and Tie men 81
his Cabinet cannot BIZ trusted By the
South, whore shall we look for those in
WHOM we can etonide? Not ink4hs North
mot in the Soath-ior no. rller North
ern man than Mr.. Bpehanah, and no
tr1er Southern men tkan5 his Cabinet, are
to BE- found in this broad land.
Into whose hands would ouropponents
place the South? Eet them bring for
ward their men and their party, and shoR
their claims to- our Support and conf
dsace before they Ask us ID cut loose
from the only party that has shown both
ilinaggness and ability II guard and pro
tect our rights.
The strangsst partof the stofy remains
yet toibe told; and that is, that the Black
Republicans Of the Month ard as bitter
f. ii EsE1 u Fa ii 49, E.k& tfI3441F II e IEH .ft