Daily Nashville patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1857-1858, 1857-12-02

following causes will stand fer
III Same VS. Smiley ct al;
.ll5 Gillian vs. Corporation;
lI9 Whitworth, use &C, vs.
Oltart;
$50 Same vs. Same;
Isl Adams vs. Payne:
lS2 Campbell VS. Crenshaw
I ct al;
'1S3 PinkertOn vs. Same;
Ils4 Smith & Co VS. Same;
.lo5 Same vs. Same;
|1>6 Same v Same;
] Isl Sam vs. Same:
Il>S Jones VS. Nance;
lls9 Jackson vs. Bell;
1870 Scarborough 4 Co VS.
Croker ct al
Il91 Turnpike vs. Spence;
1872 State Of Tenn. VS. Croker
ct al;
1873 Hawkins vs. CrOcker ct al:
1874 Harris VS. Russell ct al;
1875 T y vs. MOsby ct al;
1876 Sloan VS. Knight;
1897 Drake vs. James;
l'S Brown vs. craig;
1919 Mai er VS. Hudson;
! 200 Shelton vs. Joslin:
i2O1 Merritt vs. Cornelius:
~ yne's adm'rvs hermRr;
zO3 Bank of Tennessee VS.
Smell ct al;
2O4 Porter vs. Reynolds;
zO5 Turn Ike VS. Spence;
VOC woodward vs. Stephens
ct al;
POI tOWan VS. Joseph;
|2bS Henry ct al VS. Pearl ct al;
2Os Waterfeld ct al vs. Hoop
er ct al;
30 kubly vs. DOunel:
21t Robertson VS. Railroad;
PIP Hook It al VS. Mcfarland;
20 Mllllams VS. Utley;
i2l4 lynn vs. Shoeman;
l2l5 Keys vs. Bank
l216 hildress vs. Work, TT:
I2l7 House vs. Porter ct al;
I2lS Barns vs. hyde;
I2l9 Lawson ct al vs. Hover
ertOn ct al;
go Bank vs. Doris ct al;
221 Same vs. Same;
222 Young vs. Young;
zZ3 Howell ct al VS. Kirkpat-
/ rick;
224 Witty and wife VS. Rail-
road;
225 James vs. Wheeless;
226 White VS. Pau;
l22I Bank VS. Beatty ct al:
.22S Downs a Cows Beaumont
ct al;
- . Harrison VS. Bruce; =
I go job son vs. Harris;
h 23l Greene vs. Campbell;
1882 King vs. Same;
| 81 Hammer vs. Same;
| "a Estes VS. Childress;
2S5 Bryant vs. Scovei;
I 236 Shubert vs. Cemetery;
23T same vs. Same;
/ Z S Moore vs. Boswell;
239 Ewing, tr. VS. Railroad;
240 B.igg ct al VS. McEWen's
= admir-;
T24l Moss vs. Wilkinson;
; 242 Cowaus vs. Duff;
I243 Same vs. Scruggs;
PA same vs. Cameron;
I245 Same vs. East;
l246 ChOwniug vs. Bell;
PA Bradley vs. Edmundson;
I24S dams vs. Railroad;
J 2i9 Mo ris v Same;
i25O Moore VS. Lucus;
1851 Boswellvs Noel;
% aseltiue a Co VS. Plum,
mer q Co;
l25S Warne vs. Sloan;
!; 254 Bank vs. Briggs ct al;
20 Same VS. Phillips ct al;
i2o6 Harding vs. COltart ct al
= Iz5I McGavock VS. same;
l2aS Bryan vs. Gardner ct al;
IZ59 McEwen vs. Boyd;
200 James vs. Frierson;
I26l Sloan vs. Greene;
r Z5Z Roscoe vs. Gray ct al;
lZb3 Nance vs. Hays;
% Bri5n, admir- VS. Douglas
% Scott vs. Wright;
-I266 Stone VS. Hill;
y6I Worley vs. Porter;
p POS State Of Tenn. vs. vii
liams et al;
80 Everett vs. Love:
l27O Woodward VS. Martin;
4th Week.
'27l Trabue vs. Owen;
[ |2T2 Mitchell vs. Leake ct al;
2TS Swan vs. Meiss;
I274 Brady ct al vs. Gordon;
l215 Trigg's admir- VS. Robert
sor;
I275 Co van vs. Kilt ct al;
i2I7 Hefterman vs. Cardwell'
3; admir-:
] rs cox, tr, VS. Menefee;
1919 Stouts admir- VS. Lincoln
ESQ Corier vs. OYertoo;
1881 ohm VS. Schimler;
{ 2S2 Goodwin VS. Wilkinson;
|2S3 Horton ct al VS. Railroad
I l2S4 Armstead VS. Same;
rs Woods vs. same;
i2S6 Same VS. Same;
1851 Nc Even vs. Same;
IS Berry vs Same;
I2S9 Craighead ct al vs. Same
2gO Same vs. Same;
291 EllistOn vs. Same;
1872 Harding vs. anne;
293 McGavOck vs. Same;
i294 Lusk vs. Same;
Z98 Railroad VS. Walker;
1886 : me vs. Gee;
I29T Sa e VS. Siedge;
49S Scruggs vs. Merrill;
] 299 Wells vs. Wetmore;
? 500 Gordon W Cheatham;
30l Eusley vs. Hardcastle Ell
: a.;
300 Cox, eN'r, VS. Hall;
> SOB Hamilton vs. Byram;
80 Brien vs. Owen;
3 5 Buhum vs. Railroad;
r 500 Bruce vs. Insurance Co;
500 KimbaH 4 Co vs. WetmOre
ct al;
sos Bank vs. Stewart ct al;
SU9 Woods ct Al VS. WetmOre,
s $40 Pointer Us Wallace ct al,
81 Goodrich v Roscoe ct al,
.8l2 HambHu vs. Rumsey;
i8l3 Downs " Corporation et
al;
4; ga Barriere & Bros VS. Bell
3l5 Nancy ct al, trs. vs. Bfc-
Kay;
. Si5 Warren vs. Bank;
81 Railroad W StuIl;
3 S Garner vs. Cover;
1913 Holland ct al vs. Steam,
boat IS et al;
3 0 Hagarty vs. rame;
3 l RhOads vs. SAME;
{ p Chaleu W same;
1913 Mays ct al vs. Edwards et
al;
.324 Sawyers vs. TtndalI ct al;
S25 Hinton, ex'r vs. Same;
5 $50 Lowe vs. Same;
32T Wilson vs. Steamboat
Cumberland;
8 S Southern vs. Ledbetter Ell
E al;
IS29 Grader et al VS. Craig;
3 0 MoHrtt vs. Hartpe &c;
3D. Farquharson's admir- Vi
Joseph ct 81;
S32 Same " Goltart et al;
= 3S3 {, elvin " shoemau;
$50 COltaTt vs. King et al;
e3j Bosley vs. Railroad;
; 836 Minor e. al vs. Jones;
33l Peel and wife vs. Thomp-
! son;
8sS Kirkpatrick v Hurt;
1893 Hay IS Waggoner;
$40 RaN lings " Ledbetter;
. 81 Aldridge et al vs. Payne
e. al;
$40 same V Same;
343 X b1TtsOn 4 Co vs. Green
field;
'S4f Hodge " Alley;
. Sf5 Same s. Davis et az;
IS46 Harrison VS. Collars ct al;
'3fT Bigiey vs. johnson;
lS4S Council, use &C, vs. Tur-
neri
349 Martin rs Ackin;
i35e GoWdy vs. Dahm;
I3s1 DAVIS vs. Miller;
81 McGayock V Railroad;
! 858 wilson, use &C, Wilkinson;
1854 Noel 4 Co vs. Lyon 4 GO
et al;
IS55 Liudslev W Paul e al.