St. Charles Republican intelligencer. (St. Charles [Charles City], Iowa) 1856-1857, 1857-06-18
Gge gnttlligenter.
District COurt-June Term, 1857.
LLOYD COUNTY.

Present, Hon. Samuel Murdoch,
Judge. j. V. w. Montague, Clerk.
S. b. Starr, Prosecuting Attorney.
VIM. Montgomery, Sheriff. Members
of the Bar, Messrs. G. G.. Reinigcr, r.
G.. Reiniger, David Wiltsc, VIM. b.
Fairfield, s. b. Starr, st. Charles. Mo-
SEES Conger, Floyd. a. +. Brown, Cc-
dar Falls. Messrs. Poolcr, Bishop,
Harwood, Barbour, Van Orman, Usage.
j. 0. Crosby, Garnavillo. VIM. Nc
Clntock, S. S. Ainsworth and l.. L.
Ainsworth, West Union +. G. Bow
doin, Rockford. Lyman Odcll, Guttcn-
burg. The grand jury were in session
three days. What they have done has
not yet transpired.
Henry c. Tatum VS. Theodore Mix-writ of
error, Justices court. Rcinigcr for plf and
Starr for deft. Settled before trial
Jos. Asper VS. Martin Gates--writ of error in
Justices court Reiniger for plf and Wiltse &
Fairfield for deft. Order to Justice to make
return.
Edward Vaughn VS. Samuel F. Pearson-pe-
tition and attachment. Reingcr for plf. Con-
tinued from last term-judgment 10y default.
Peter S. & r. V. Schampvs Andrew Sample,
James Griffith and Henry C. Tatum-petition.
Rcinigcr s Fairfield for plf. Continued from
last term-struck from docket by request of
plaintiff.
Andrew Sample VS. James Grifith-petition
debt. Reiniger for pf and Bishop. Har
wood & Odell for def. Continued from last
term. Demurrer granted and judgment rem
dered for plf-exceptions taken.
Robert Frost VS. Jacob Beelar-petiton-
- "a
tinued by stipulation of parties on file
Eugene Barber Christiana Barber and David
Ripley VS. Lyman Parish--Petition in equity.
Reiniger for plf and Bishop & Conger for deit.
Continued from last term-decided on demur
rer and decree entered in favor of plf-appeal
taken
German Lovejoy VS. four o. Hairs and boy
Ben petition for damages. Starr & Odell for
plf Reiniger, McClintock & Crosby for defts.
Continued from last term-change Of venue
taken to ChiCkasaw county.
Samuel Lovejoy VS. the same Change of
venue taken to Chickasaw county.
William Casar VS. Elbyidge G.. Sargent-pe-
tition and attachment. Reniger for plf and
Witse & Fairfield for deft. Continued gener-
ally.
Elisha " Smith vs. Vaetta NJ. Smith--peti-
ton for partition of real estate. Noble & Odell
for plf. Continued for Observation-Disclosures
by default
George C Moore VS. Hampton ~ Smith-pe-
tition and attachment. Starr for plf. Order
for publication.
Francis Wright VS. Joseph Wright petition
and attachment, Reiniger for plf. Contin-
ued for publication.
Sherman Jewett and Francis S Root vs. Sid
ney s. Smith-pcttion and attachment NJ
Conger for plfs and Reiniger brothers for dctt
Motion to quash oyorrulcd-judgment for
plaintiff
-~~-cs.tcvN Thomas VS. SdnCy p ii,' WI
ton and attachment Brown for plf and Rein
iger brothers for delft Motion to quash over
Judgment for plaintiff.
Barrett King Il Co. VS. Sidney 5. smith
petition and attachment. Conger for plf and
Reinger brothers for deft. Motion to quash
overruled-judgment for plaintiff.
Andrew & lreadway VS. Sidney S. smith
petition and attachment. Eeiniger for plf.
Judgment by default.
H. ID. Randall & Co VS. Sidney S. Smith
petition and attachment Reiniger for pit.
Judgment by default.
Elijah ID. Smith VS. VIM Montgomery-pe-
ton and replevin. Wiltse & Fairfield for pl
and Brown and Conger for deft Motion to
quash granted and judgment rendered in IA
vor of dcft-exceptions taken, Appealed tc
supreme court.
J A J. Bird VS. Charles Greenwood--pc
ton and attachment. Wiltsc & Fairfield 70,
plf and Ainsworth for deft Continued to eff
feet service at plaintiff $ cost.
Humphrey Hogan VS. George W Chittcnder
petition and attachment Wiltse 4 Fair
field for plf and Conger, Bishop and odell fol
dedt- Continued to effect service at plaintiff,
cost Garnishment continued.
Charles Greenwood VS. James H Terry-pe
tition-dcbt. Starr for plf and Reiniger fol
delft Tried by the Court. Judgment for plf
Goddard Green & Co, VS. George Wyatt
petition--debt Roiniger brothers for plf anC
McClintock & Ainsworth for dcft. Continued
defendants filing security
John E.asterly VS. George Wyatt petition
debt Reinigcr brothers for plf and BowdoiI
and McClintock for deft. Continued for ser
vice.
4. VIM. s. Rockwell VS. George Wyatt-peti
tion--delt Reinigcr Brothers for plf an'
Bowtoin and McClintock for deft. Continues
for service.
Eli Will vs. Theodore petition--debt
Reniger brothers for plf and Wiltse falr
field for deft Continued.
Ferguson e. Eastman vs. d. F. Braci<ett am
VIM Montgomery--petitio n-debt. Relnige
brothers for plf Judgment by default.
A. j. Bird VS. John Parish-petition-
debt. Reiniger brothers for plf- Continued
L. ID. Randall Co. VS. S. c. Goddard
Co.-petition and attachment. Eeiniger bro
for pills ana W lltsc " Fallnciu iDT utls. TX
murrer granted and continued at plf"s cost.
John Blunt VS. Edward Sutton-petition
debt Reiniger brothers for deft JudgmeI
by default. .-.
John Blunt VS. Edwin Swift and Sol Swift
petition--debt. Reiniger brothers for deft
Settled.
Ferguson & Eastman vs. A. II. Brackett-
petition-debt. Rciniger brothers for DIETS
Judgment by default.
Edwin A. Haskell VS. Charles Greenwood
petition-debt. Starr for def. Judgmei
by default
james Griffith VS. Henry C. Tatum and Al
drew Sample -petition-debt. Bishop
HARDWOOD for plf and Reiniger brothers for def
Settled
Rebecca J Tatum ct al VS. James Grifli
ct petition-debt. Reiniger for plt
Settled
j. D. Seaton VS. Henry c. Smith and Ain
ra B. Smth--petition- debt. Reiniger brot
ers for plf Judgment by default.
David Ripley VS. Deborah Edwards ct al
petition in equity Reiniger brothers for pl
Judgment by default
There were 81 foreclosures of the equity
redemption in the matter of tax titles-all co
tinued for publication.
On an exparte hearing in case of foreclosu
of Mortgage by advertising and sale, the Mo
gagor, Charles Greenwood, put in plea
usury and oppression and prayed for an
junction to prevent the sale of the property
foreclosure by the Sheriff. Injunction granite