The Tipton advertiser. [volume] (Tipton, Cedar Co., Iowa) 1856-1962, 1857-01-24

| '. yatnr y zanes 1885, go.
s,5ss :; T:,ss% =. Il:
urged deenden ought have alleged that the plain
tiff the bond without value with nocewe reply that no such d.
illegally Fraud being pleaded and by the demurrer admitted
presume plaintiff bona ds holder lfshis al
legation made the dnden would not have prove IT. Tor ne
on Bay vs 10 '' saying
an Illegal Instrument and put in issue whether you are sa
That presumption law need be aedgd requires authority
and require require what tho law pesunes and what
necessary proof establish; therefore plea Of fraud
like the present is not necessary fer the deendn. Gaeg' nes or
that the plaintiff took the bad faith and he the plaintiff
Even negotiable paper has been oan'd
aua he or robbery entitled TO recover only the amount he has
Before the questions arising the amended answer
wish aude the legal character the Bond sued The Plaintiff
wall be from the record claims that the bond and are
negotiable with all the incidents Of negoab hence the d.
10 the dences the because not alleged that
We deny bond and coupons properly be considered
nsga6s paper aud that the law OF ordinary commercial paper ep
The difference between the and obvious Evs:y
son VINO SUI has right issue his negotiable paper 10 any
and any Tie Of which ordinary
commercial or negotiable and known 10 gen
e IN most instances for ascertain the zeal consideration
Tor which such paper was given and hence the law does not REQUIRE
vastly different The County Judge who issues them has no inherent
well defined us sa onp a wa EXISTS not in
pas but OF Record ani the inspection Of all Therefore all
at their peril whether bonds have properly aud legally issued
These bonds being regarded ordinary negotiable paper hence
follows that the defense that illegally issued tho
not bound further and aege expressly that the an
TIL had notice OF such illegally because he bound take notice OF IT,
aud because not being goae like ts and the assignee
must give the maker order constitute valid assignment
In Court already decided the June $685.
the OF MERCHANTS Bank Hr which
Is respectfully referred
In lie Of the Mr and .'h Bank, HewM speaking of
instruments falling So Code a
language In order valid assignment, the
IN writing like the that of the assignment
o the
The whole law aud negotiable
paper is collected in. .@-
r ,%,S,9 Lea: ga: S S,ss s 2.s e :, d, "a
'Aa note with watran, OF attorney attached not nsgoa
Gases page $50 in Country no are negoa.
Die but regular p1omlssory notes and bills Of exchange
Where Justice Bronson very sensible remarks. which
we would like 70 2@9s Mad %, s e 'p' Ssn Also ss
S,:.ss: y ssnss1;s; 81
The bond sued being negotiable paper equities
parties Insss 'sG s9as 5a Co. 'ss a s @
Bonds given by the East Indian Co. held though
order and bearer and
order to make them
| esa ys on h snis 1 10 East ''''
tue requirements of the code had teen complied notice was
gwen OF the submission what that submission that the
was made the result published as required by law sc.
10 this the Realtors dnued thereby admitting of the
answer be true In fact the only which opinion the
court was sought in tina, the right admng
Bonds the road was constructed = ISSUE '''
bare majority Of the decided that he lad right see opn-
ion BY Judge Hall. r.
The ground which Judge Hall based opinion that he could
not see how the could aid vet not nav
! the money until constructed. -
Take the whole order Of submission together give effect it,
nnc not the far which the voters
would put upon IT, thus-W the aid build Re-, Road
by subscribing $50 600 the stock lie
DUNG ITS progress through the eouny2 rendering sub
san,a add the Rail Road CO. "
by H. they SELL par 500 shares of their payable as the o
or when completed The people county made with
with his mechanic ud house and pay you as The work pro
crosses upon completion" " - ~
And "ald' o the builder?
Can effect be given to the whole proposition other
- so WHAT Que COOK 4 DILLON,
! ATTY for Defendant