The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1857-09-25
Application Ia hestors . convicted Lawyer
to the Rolls Drnsed-lnteressi, x tSseasion.
eUPRBhB ooURr-GEsKRAL TERN.
Refnre Hon. Iudsas hitnhelI- Clerka and IlAxiaa

s,rT "a In ne Mater IF the Application Of -
Law ~iI be r ool.cted that some years ago .
m Der Of the fe~ Ycrk bs tried abd vioed at
,be sesiops, before oorder Tall nsdge OF ring
money from re, pectape through tue me dunn
OF ~ do, fui repu ,sicp and sentenced
mpi,onnentis toe Stale pnscn Tor period Of Ab'o
h,se years Soce his relesse has Aite ted prso
tee agsn, boz motor having b-eu MAZE Ia the Marine
Uour, 70 rcbio oi spsra, professionally, that toa
ns oecoed thai DC uta not practise there rhs natter
Then Def re the central tenn Of tho Supreme Court
pvesi ing Justice MI ihel has til fol-
Ss'sx Decision -ni9n Consarrsd IN .as o' :" ~
,ape had been stricken fr,m the roIIs while
without poice to HIM On examination of be
nes OF The court, appeared that he had been
s,nc, p&rorsiy Win Io'icr tf the oofo'e no
s,,, he @s,e ~ son and -h'o he -s In the Tomb,
unosr ten,euce, snd his application "a, denied He
VIZ hn ap oA' on a,a a'p.ns Ma. s service must.
forsobp u, ard sivg ihst the order " removal
700 became no sas pot served Win copy Of charges,
rtbts sDd BIZ right he Office Il alto meg aa5 ap
es and d-feno bmseH, suspended the stssusory
q, snS :. 70 N N. -
clu'ps that Of pvso irg attorney He furnishes
evdrrce r-fnnai'n o. cbarscscr, bot s'acds ON hs
epsl rights BE ptenocd In Dcoeu ber $780, % the
Stale phon for two and sx month";, for obtaining
uorey on fsie rree' oes fhe or ~s not an ordlDa
~ one undc-sood, aiding parties Who eutssd
. The company OF woman VINO srci,e
tsssioIs thcn have her husband ceteol MIN and
seT..d money ,o a% M 'nr ns w as
Of pusion emptsnon me act Of the tempter
for ,hs sslc Of mshu b. the ~estne-s Of Others There
be strong evceo eof before such pessn
cocid admitted 70 bsr He Gays that his family
deperdebt him, ard thai many clients reA1y 70
urses ia, q shese clients a,s vIue 70 trust him. he
ought bcs be syciuccd. rssy may trust him, ana ps
rby ne ssy 30 faithful 70 Them bu, the danger that
upris sousIy ards those whom op-
20 cd, he old n tue wheS he convicted A.
stunning that me pardp amer the term OF I'm Srisonmsut
has esrued may resore tho convic W The OWL r,shS
ory vbs legal sfsa ~ the sentence merely 70
p,pd i'm q ON ns ONCE MT n dsp,ivc MIN Of u
r sye, b., in Coers oops,osrn that The rrsyy o. Az
Cpoe ue0 him 10 remain 90 II, rolls attorney,
.tru,k CT mis- name ACCOUNT 81 that offence II -as
dut. hcb Deed " the pubic Ia order T. prevent hs
.vsilrg bmseH OF booorape onoc W deceive the
mcpy For the "a, noe alone, without ocnvctioa
course The pardor therefore had no en- o, on tn oriar
Of tho Court The Re Used Statutes allow this court
NOV, n.'@,s.aos o. m.sems.no,; ss eo up oasy
~ tho cha Gss shall have pcea delivered by the
Jerk 70 BIN, and an Q pcrssri shall hsyo been
.ecs 20 and 40 a. In this nooe o. the nsendsd
served sinAy, together With copy Of Inc
ccpv,coo h pc4 csseptsi that the charger be draw
~ IN a. MT enough tney be presensed In aida
vita or REQ W show shaa the offence sn vnioh
70. sosus,a essyss s copy q me soa,oon 10
90, that the charge Assnst him Wa, thai ne gas
gully q os,slsss ~ false p'eencel, and that
No no 'nss 70 sussa ne 6oors Sei,re he "a. con
6ned p~~oe and csud have been heard ~ hu
storhey. Whatever DC tnt ruios IN owl Aoauns IN
siu icd against ined In prison and ~heher
sooh actcos prosecuted moi, the rerioon doe.
&c, apply 70 mnicn 70 remove an suorne, Tor one o.
the expressly provided for bis remtva ~heo he
has beep guilty Of mtsdemeanor The oaiy conclusive
evidence 81 such guilt the oCuvcucn Of ,he oandsr,
ano imprison nest u the nssquenci ~ convicton rhs
statute therefore, intended that tnsc who we're nadergo
ius the sen,ence Of tseir crimes might poved II ne
asd ~thed 70 DO heard he could have TAKEN means 70
nwify the Oourt OF such wsh the Caur would, " ne
ccsery, have had him brought into court n lhs
not co. tho Pre,ept application is 70 vacaie an der
M b In rfxw1n~ Tho, mn
rank Of attorney o. the oourt the ours would not
vscae he ovder, egen had bsea granted irrosuls
they say they would be bound ~ The mo 70
order 10 the same eneot thai nov erisnns) o.
tho inertia of the case and they would, N tn,s uaoanu
ne further heard order se Appoaa, a the SAN
time 70 sbo- Why ne- order shcuic - made
suihrg h,s name r m the rolls wh that ordse .nou
not CONFIRMED she conviction alone ,bozid lead VI
result end The pardon impss so. ID
| tuch pfocsed,ps II va argued ,hsi zoe tenn "ols
demeHscsn In ,he statute quoted, would iaulnde tas
srpicsst, he guilty ~ felcny that tbs
msart oniy mssdemeanor nectsd with profession
iUs term and 10 the osnneo,ou found
rsvsed laws 1878, chap ~, seo g. and Of 1900, CHAP