The spirit of democracy. [volume] (Woodsfield, Ohio) 1844-1994, 1857-09-23


Common Pleas Of Monroe Oouutys 5
u sss6Asa 81 hofao 49, 8 e N ':<
tsD Edwin dl Z T. : Eyipg Bl.siPstE
James Karby, Stephen DaB Andrew Hkins 4
Joseph Wright, Defendants.
! TtlIE said DESCENDANTS VIII take Anotic6 tls{ ~
4 the 7th day Of Juiyg-A. D. 1891, the pla1S::
tiff fled his petition in said Court agsiriSt tie
and that the essaraea is now pending Ia ~ s
Court. The plaintiff alleges in ssid petiti11
that on or about the 18th day of Novo1S
A. D. 1854, he sold to the defendants KSe1
and Day, the blowing tract Of land in MoSi
county, aforesaid to wit Beginning On d
t'ohio river bank at the break of said 6aukk z 4
The line dividing the landsof Aaron Yost, lfo;
l'iandssefsE II. Ewing; thence up the rirer ~ &
north 4S9 degrees east s and Sstelatif l>es0hea
to'a locust, thence north 65 degrees xSkt "a
perches to stone; shences south 4s3 deetss5.
west 8 sperches 70 a stone: thence north IS do
grees west - and 4 5 huiidredtn perclIes 70 { 3
stone: thence south 2st degrees west three
perches:.o % astone; thence south rs degrees east
SS and 50 hundredlth perchcs to tho place 81
beginning, with the landing south Of a. &.
Bwing's present row'iof oak spickets u Abw
water mark on which was large frame miIl
house, and saw milf engine fixtures TO-, fisjsi
dwelling house, &C., the plaintiff sold said preu<-
ises to said Kerby and Day with the arErsee
ment that no steam Touring merchant min
should ever be erected on said premises
The said Kerby and Day wereto pay two thop-
sand dollars for said premises, as follows:
Five hundred dollars May 49, 1856. With n 3
terest at seven per cent. per annum from No.
vember lS, 1855 and one hundred and ffty
dollars zach and every year, commencin on The
18th of Move mber, 1855, and all being interost
at per cent, per ,annum, from November Is. :
1885, until the whole sum OF two thousand
dollars With interest as hfofesSid was paid: !,
The plaintiff made deed to Kerby and Dav o.
the 9th of December, 1854, cenyeyinF fhen
ssie premises in fee, subject IT, the Psynsnt
aforesaid al and to the reservation a1aFessia-
The plaintiff in his petition admits the :receips
of the first Payment of five hundred dollara
except the. sum of thisty-ons, dollars and 30
cents, and alleges that no other pay rnepts
The I plaintiff charges hs;a .ss'sS nat lie nam. MIN
house has. been SOLIDS saidpremisee apdthat
the saw7lnil has been suffered to get out Of %
pair SO that he is in danger Of loosfng part pf
mis- debt The plaintiff, also, alleges in hh
bill that the defendants Wright and 81 ikins have
rented the mill and the plaintiff asks for Ajpdg-,
i-sers at per cent, per annum on Sl5Q 4rom
November is, 1855 and interest On Sc 80, the :
residue at 9 Per cent per annnms from October
That the whole debt Il due and Il become IL. i
may be adiudged a valid vendors lien sgainst
said properly That the properly may BE- sojd
IN time to suit, the payments Is they fall 4pe,
md that. plaintiff claims he paid o4t Of the
) proceeds. The plaintiff also asks for the,ap-
continent OF receiver TO rent, receive rents
IND contract the propertya s q Es.ssII sssss 8
n said county, on the 10Th Of July, 1897, Tor
he appOiptmeuf of n racoivar- The cofd = =