New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-02-28

DUO 70 '" P'o
Ihe paper in querticc /. .ddrs~seA 10 4. u,ctso,o,
sao l. pat u he archives Of s- oh "a aad "a %,
sgav- q1eston as 70 rhs III bs Of rhe nr.io .oruI.
- VI -e n.y uetiuies CvSFetsp .he lice Il rvct c,-
od ell paee Of erc,tecneoti but the leuer iuss rvs
tteus 70 doste lbs tie 10 t. be deli ocss ~y car
SISTED ID He .c-ln therefore, SUGGEST that toe vso,-
sues DC reyoEted "a toe Cifcatt Court 80 n.
ftdi.e~ ~ Dot be bed there. Ever isht-uiad-d
uen vculd agree with h:u tia; tns IS Gee ~nich
Call. iur iedees tie sstabishme. vi rule b, which
paFcee may uncsrs ana pssosey ~oat teir rights are
DE Bad hi'belo rssy. ctec Mr.. Busted ard noped
coniinue bis reepect still bis sct must speak for he
de suegs 10 that The Investigation Do sdJol,ned 40
ui Iaesda, net', for the prrpo.e of hsvOg this TIM
pttt,bt question seOite.y settled, AMI toea, II they
had 10 reoits' they ~orid subuit
TIE cOhAIssiosERs yIEw OF HIS POWERS
Goa NH, oLes Belts s1o b. scpeoved the suggest N
OF Mr. TIlou ~ss bssed the suppoei ion tnaI tnsrr
wss NJ remedy or power OF Pto'eciea in the eAnds OF
the C. mnssioIer, therefore ne decned |. proper t.
sta:e What upon rejection and exsnnson ape % rsd
10 him tn be the extent and II Of tie powers of the
Commissioner. After the incideat Vt yesterday, t
s-emsd pecc.sGy both Tor TIE defense sad the prse
Gu ION, that os h.te undNst snding should be
riveo st II ;ne CONAN sloLer h.s no powes 10 Pre-
vent the ap,ropriai:cn eud dstenon b. lrssl Of
paIe- prccEct jor icentcsior teen be has power
I, iseveht TIE appropriation If opposite counscs bof
or Minutes oil tesii-noiy, CT snytthg e.se- He CSC
bGoy expect that ~ibesscs viii stteud unless
reled when they no, projected from IL, iniens.
spce ofcouIs el with their : ghts and ptoprY.
y
eel soes lot bold a court, tlat The prccescuys
before bin are Lot Judicial lite Ordinary reuesy foe
any olsorccIiy oct IL Court by nent, p,&cin
tie ,f,Loer 70 the castofy of the Sheriff or Marsha
bu ss tbs pr ceecngs before hin we're judicial DO
opinion rnst he hsd DO poser 10 eIrruse 10 ct
means o. enioicDg order, and be felt no depsttioa ~
go step beyond his exsi po~ers- Coog'tss has sP.
pointed c, hko tho preseat ~ take
the IdenAe of criminaty. X II Is decned scicieut
lie i, ceYiy the to the execution, sndconGiit
fbe accused 10 Walt the orders " toe SEQ etVy Ut
S'st.. lie quoeo two decisions of the SupcGe Court
lie Unit.o States We Feneiia, Is dow, u. $40,
aud names case, pei Curtis j., II Hos.l % totNt
feet thsi Dls ret Judge sitting 10 dctermiLe ,ter
referred TO bin by act Of Go Va, not sitting Us
Court, aid bad Lof JUDICIAL power Lots seetnst 70
opoe OF the epggtsten 10 r,eT this matter The Cir
cut Court for Il Supreme CouIt then helc tia tloy
bad appellate jurpdict'on. He was sitting a. tbs
VI the execu i've and hot OF hs ~ itcrl
power ibt Government, aud suPpcsed BITE sltioc
to be the would De tnat VI tue Secretary Ut
State II the at bad cevolved tho duty upon h L.
seac of Commissioners, aud he did MT believe toe
Secretary couo arrest counsel of misconduct, however
g,oss
Bot there was another aspect OF the case and that
WIS Whether the prsopers have LAX, legal right 70
be he aid represented Lete at al by COUNSEL Il tnis
were criminal prosecution. or e1smication oei0rs
smnitiIg nsgistrsie any coUr, both Dy toe Con-
strulon oil d the of Congress the prisoCer would
Lave u light Ia Re hcsrd by counsel. oct Ia all such
size couIu have Judicial po~er and the tsot to
enforce OiCer.
Ttis case however was merely 40 inquiry before the
CtumssiuLer o. tie representative Ut The Executive.
esc.,t,b certsn facts ss toe basis OF the scoa OF
II E1ecu,e OF tie country, and seemso ~ niE nst
the pIls have right, cchsosed ~ Al aostrat
question, to be he1rd BY cUucse- He c>nc 'vei III It
II tt Secretary If ATE considering whether ~
Question VI padoDs policy, these pfroues should Dc
c.i,e,ed over 10 France, he would give taen the
privilege Of counsel aseisaneo ~ himself 10 as
CERTAIN Il Correct state VI The facts bot tue oGelt
hey departed from good osdet On, decordm and oe.
cane biLorance rather t0sn an assstance, he weud
Withdraw the privilege. ,,
Ia The fur hes prvcetdi 10 hi case be should bs
ructaIt 10 stpiy that rue, but 1t sbo1lo seen 10
n,u Iecesssry for the encs o. jus1cs thst c 'uuso
should Lot be further heard he shoud not tssfs1 To
ceclsre II "a,
file then announced that he wa. ready to g on with
the care or 10 hear s6y motions OF soggtstiocs.
Mr. Busteed-n toe Comais.onsr pease- ~,
MIR. Tliou-lt tie k.ntl- man WIN alo NC WIZ
move now acjourbment 70 tuesday next
MR. BusIYED IN JoACHIsssEs, THE rRIBLrB.
HiMsELf, TT AL.
Mr.. b. stted isid h1 "a stenea With attention 90
,esp. CT 10 ate itmarss Of mr. III lou toe Conn .
soper snd no 1ever he might differ from their via %
he I'll, ud stu respect them The droIsioa Ut yes e.
Cay had given ihs case u,cue NJ; riety qu-sti a
arose as 10 the ri hit " cutody OF pager presAntsa
a. be Understood it. which rhs On resd
ug il, tie Impressed with its Importance, snd ~
f,it il bis ouiy to retain IL He would MT reply 10 TO-
snua'iOIs III ACE by gentcuian yes efday. He VINO
G. grades hm,. 40 far 10 call another tot H. IL
wUrthy Of rotice. Yesterday there "a, 10 tterasfve
blI 10 what Appeared 10 De dsrespeofi TO toe Com
Ill Gonei, or 10 leave IN Their adv.rsarles haoos
peItr deemed mp II, mt 70 the defense SO for
ht proc. ed rgs Of yesterday; so usch In reply to tie
alicious aid mean Nominations Of one OF tho news
papers OF thu city.
A for the letter Itself, it had been returned to Mr.
Tilou.
After tbs disclaimer and in any view ofMr Busted Q
conauct yesterday be thought Il not dseepectfui ~
The cuursioner, or con rary to gvod order. The
coutscl tor brisoners desiIOps OF Conducting
ID. msev.s rs il the presence Of the highest adiosl
tlbLJa, co'htd with supnm ms power 10 the matter Of
decpon aid punis N. Mt, ard ale resoy 90 to sasmis
TO Ike Con InlssoIer rulings
Mr. Bustttc vent Gu to argue the general pDina OF
TIT cott He ipobe Of the wording Of tie sta'e. -
requiring ugitivcs from jus 10 be returned accord
II the aw " ibe state, which be regarded ss supreme
ard sOvefeign, compared with tho FerefA Govern
cit ale % thst to which We oweo our nfes
lie had 10 coubt that the Commissioner would " Jtect
,be p,kurtrr quite wsh as tie long array OF their
couIfel. lie reverted again 10 toe chAgs which M
JoacLim sell made yesterday aud desired 10 iaqaire
VT ether any ber nan The 100 OvU lDhAotaats VI
New York would accuse him Of pc ~ larceny.
Dir Buskeo FULLY ooncurIed with the ceoison OF the
Sup tine Court IL the eases referred u by tue CON-
nssiober, IL Of which TX sines case 40 wsS Coz
ceilt irVD Tho outset.
He ctn,eI oed thai the Commissioner had no 20 yer
70 &C oLIr except necessttae ana that the rcuit
Court coulo isse no Jurisdiction Of tbs care, toe
p oe. eoiDks ere ceItned " IL. lLaemncn u hsd
psrtd ith its CrelLu poser - conoaissoosfs ae~s
La.d by eel. To what goo, 'ben. tbs sdjvurn@sati
by ahet III lot can this fuftner wong be dole
MI Busted consicei 60 that the counsel for tho prs
oleis sLo for the 4Overnaeut were 10 the wroas
lie olC Lot believe that mr.. IuHoa Noc0 chA16e nLn
With animIs IrT0ndi
MIR. Burfeed therefore urged
II a. the G.. uuAisscttr hss right TO adjourn ne
under the principle that whs's ne rss 81 ne
served. "u bos ia the imDaculsts custody o. tns
cour.ef fcr tho 6o*ssbn@Li 600 10 1A1iy oSp1Os W
sacCseo OF la.cen,-s ciae Of Nhico We were never
"be.re chs,g.o. We plctnse, hereafter, to take 90
"ust+r u vur posseesion which tho Coalm.sioner