New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-01-30
Ii " INTELLIGENCE.
THAT DIVORCE CASE AGAIN.
fCRERIOR COURT-sTEcAL TEIM-JAs. 2s-Betore
judge DVER.

Tie children Of tbs unhappy couple was a, ssue came
pp to-day in the Superior Court.
VIC reelected 20 state the other day that the plaintiff.
h this case who was well known many years ego az
Trust the barpst, has more recently adopted the fe
bcitous appelaOn Of DR.. Fe tx Gouraud, under which
Nom dc gue,Te his advertisements Of nedicated soap
MI n papers. The intrinsic interest Of the c3se and
Me heraTy merits Of paIts Of the llesdings "a
ihe suit, lead Us to insert them in fun.
COMPLAINT.
The complaint Of Joseph w. Trust, plsin'if 10 this
action respectfully shows 10 his honorable Court, that
on or about the 9h day Of October, 1889, he was Law
fully married 20 the said defendant, Mary +. Trust. in
NJ. Cry OF New-York, State Of New York ths! the
Dsme OF the def, ndent before her ssd marriage and
which sbe derived from Der parents Mary +.
Grew that the complainant and defendant after their
marriage between them cobabted together IN relation
of an snd WIFE and there has been sue by ssid mar
800 chnra" ts-n 1."~h' ~, -, cons respec
hTsiy bon and named az follows Constance Corneia
Trust BON Stpt 7, 1870; Andreas Hotter Irlht bern
Sept 1872 hyP1Sts San G5r1 Sry Perc yoi Bysske
Shelley Trust, born July 80, 1915 Volney Voltaire
Trust, born Nov. 49, 1872 ,
That of the Aforesaid ssue Of this complainant ana
defer dsnt two have died, the rest are living and sup
ported By this complainant
That for q long spaoc OF time this c0mplainant nA
supported himself and the said defendant ana tue
children issue OF said complainant and defend ant re-
spectiyey by the avGils Of his industry and his 0us
ness "a periumer, in syle and manner correspond
lnp with his t ans but the defendant treated this COM
planant with hsIshDess and with brutal manner ana
.ioence that she exercised an authority, control and
vicous fuepce over SAID children beyond the power
Of complainant 20 change; that while he was at ms
store attending TO biz business she would have men at
his house contrary his wishes and without MS KNOW"
eJoe: that in the year 1852 sue took into his house to
b. ard tenae of bad reputitiJn; that she also took
various men into bis house. and ia def ace OF
his refaa to admit them that ssd men Ge nj
refused 10 leave bis house at his request, say
ing that they had engaged TO board with defendant;
mat upon one occasion, when complainant remon
strated It'll her up N her improper conduct ana ne
was pacing tho psrOr Of his house, with bis child Vol
pey IL his arms che dashed chair at him, which he
fortunately lodged loss Of life or injury to limb OF
himself aud Child must have been the consequence;
MAT AZ or about the beginning of 1852 the defendant
Beft the bed and continued 10 leave the bed OF ms
comp anant and would have her meals sent up 10 her
bedroom and etnes in the room CONNIE ted with
where she would be in the company Of men; THAI on
several occasions when this complainant went home at
night TO his bed after business be sup seed the pres
encc Of man; that after this on certain evening az
about 10 o'clock, complainant en'ered the room SUI
denly and saw O man named Romaunt, 0Oaider III
the house sitting at the fire, and defendant at table
IN dressing gown; that tbereup0n this complainant
approached bin and informed him that Il was time he
kft the room, and az he went to his bed'chamoa ne
insoleDtly replied that he would 90 when he pleased
called complainant liar and struck him; that CON.
pafnsnt struck him back when defendant seized hold
Of complainant by the hair Of his head and held him
ter charge. that several occasions she has taken
away bis children and lett them at places unknown to
him until payment for their board was demanded
This complainant further charges that one evening
when he returned from his business, at q oclock hs
infant Yolney, then deriving sustenHnce from has
mothers breast was alone in bed and his mother this
defendant out OF the house, gone TO certain house
and reached home with man at | O'Clock In
the morning; that such conduct continued until
April, 1853, when complainant and defendant
agreed to separate; his furniture and effects were
o,I ~ nf
1856 complainant separated from her paying her $40
IN adyance-the agreed TO be paid to her. for her
support and the children. weekly tina, sad sums were
duly paid TO her, notwithstanding she at various times
cane TO the store OF defendant abused and assaulted
him.
And the complainant further say, and charges that
sbe the said Mary f. Trust defendant has some time
psst-that Ia to say, since the year 1885, and contn-
ually ND 70 the present time-been committing adul
terry with Il man whose name il -, at Pettens
Hotel Greenwich street, at the house OF his complain
ant No Ia Greene street. and other places in the state
Of Nes.Yolk.
And this complainant further charges that defendant
has been committing adultery at the fremont House,
corner OF FOrtieth street aud Sixth avenue with man
whose name ia Samuel f. Lyons; AMI departed 10 the
pose sion of ssid Lyons the sum of 81 loO TO pay
iheir joint expenses TO California as well as the
tinuoht.r aged sixteen, of this defendant, named
Constance c. Trust; that said Lyons retained the
money and refused TO take her.
AID this complainant further says that he and the
raid defendant are now, and have oeen Ior sever
State Of New York and reside in said city; that hVc
wears have not elapsed since the discovery by hm oil
The several acts of adultery herein set forth and that
said acts of adultery or either OF them have moi Deen
committed by the privty, knowledge, connvance or
procurement of the complainant; that since the as
coyery of the said several acts of adultery committed
by the defendant and herein charged, he hes not CO.
Asbited with her, said defendant.
And your complainant prays relief from this honora-
ble Cout by the Judgment aud decree that the mar
Rage between the complainant and defendant, Mary
" Trust may be dissolved, aud the plaintiff be DIE
charged from the obig cations thereof and that the said
MARY f. Trust be prohibited from contracting marriage
during the lifetime of complainant; and that the said
May +. Trust be prohibited from having the care,
custody, or control of cOmplanants children
And that the said defendant be further adudged and
aecreed to pay the costs of this his action.
II. II. SHANNON, Plaintiffs Attorney.
Those parts of the complaint which are ncosed
within brackets were struck out redundant and ir-
relevant on motion ef the defendant who then put in
ne following
ANSWER.
Mary f. Trust defendant, answers the amended
complaint herein follows:
married 10 the plaintiff and that there has been issue
said marriage as stated in the complaint, aud that
aid plaintiff and defendant have been and now are
Inhabitants Of the City, County and State OF New
Herk.
But this defendant denies that since her marriage
With the plaintiff she has committed adultery with aay
or ether OF the mentioned in the complan, at the
t3D.s aud places mentioned IN the complaint, any
ftem with any other man or men, or al any other
inc OF times place or pisces.
Ana this defendant denies generally every other al
legation In s,id compliant not herein specifically admit
ned or denied
Wherefore The defendant demands judgment in her
hvcr snd TIA. che recover of the plaintiff her costs Of
Mis- acton. MEAGBER& CAMFBELL, Def rs A;tys.
The hearing to-day was application by Mrs.
Trust for ahmony pesdea,e he The boy Audreas was