New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-02-18
COURT OF COMMON PLBAs-PARr II-FEB H.-Before
Judge DAILY.

COURT OF COMMON fLbAS-tART ll-rhb' i-pe'o'e
Judge DAILY.
lFAMILY QUARREL-THE cHURcHMAN AND CHURCH
JouRNAL AT LoGGERHEADs.
John Hecker agt. john II. Hopkins.
The quarrel between The ChNrchmda and Church
Journal which we have already had occasion to no
tice to trial this afternoon More than one white
neck. cloth TO be seen in and about the City Hail.
attracted thither by interest curiosity abou. the
case.
The plaintiff who is the proprietor Of The Church
man, claims So 600 damages for alleged libel which
was published 10 Nov, 1885, in The Church Journal,
OF which Bishop HopkiDs, the defendant. is editor
Both these journals espouse the doctrines OF the Episoo
pe Church. The paragraph complained OF Is as
Follows:
NH Hecler hiss been chiefly remarkable for his 10
the -four and baking bnsRes and for his great failure IN the
vsed 30 long Calling supplies bin with be
o't on paper and types We admire ne %
cash nd lament that so much Of expense and energy should
penable in conducting Church paper We should
have aid this much long as az item OF useful information
ooep ny We have Looked up,n s eTrsde course ours more
pressed by many others But since the paper lie getting TO
Be and prolific in against The Clergy aud
gapce best ard faithful ana Aborous
Ss SSmR o. When Ps s gu. les, p Ts csuesns
found proceed only from uueducsed dealer in cereals and
English lsymsn fresh from his mother country whose
opinions are those e~po,e the noise power
Lees stage and the sweet yedng OF kue VIII never
cnde the milk OF human hndne' IN the breast OF sny reason
I'VE understand that in order to replace in
prophesr entering new field OF action IN the BLACK
Ing business"
The plaintiff goes on 70 aIege that the publication Of
this Ibeous matter intended 10 degrade him IN the
eyes Of the public and especially of the resders OF TIE
Church Journal, and claims TO have been injured 10
the amount Of $1,000
The defendant pesds In justification the truth Of TIE
Church Journals statement throughout and sets up IN
defense an article ths. appeared in The ChurctmaH.
This article il is alleged reflected 50 'eversy upon tue
clergy in general and tia Rev. DR. Egenbrodt, tue
rector of the parish of All Saints in particular, as TO
draw forth the comments which led TO this actton A
jury mpapneled and the case was taen ad-
ourned 20 the morning in order 10 give the parties an
opportunity 70 settle the difficulty it able TO agree
d. ID. Field & Nelson for plaintiff; Hoffman x Pier
son for defendant
SPECIAL TxpM-Bsfore judge IxcKAHAN.
John y. Clue agt. Frederick Peiure
lSGRhHAN \. il find IN the papers submitted 10
Se IN this matter nothing justify the conclusion tina; petit
ton, proceedings not fair free from fraud There may
Dc dneences IN his account OF goods held BY him coDm
mon OF even IN regard 10 the Affairs OF the patheIshp but do
not think the law requires particular statement Of saca
eyfy in his custody.
The goods Reid by hr sell WIS not his
yps him thereon except for eSe~osts hold
rror In regsrd such sufficient 10 defeat as
evidence am led 70 conclude that the effects of
le peoper baye been used and 5s nothing remains to
him conceal that there evidence Of inenona fraud or
enf AID that the interest Of the creditor aud OF Tho
.oper viii be best promoted by dshsgns the debor from
be discharge his present Indebtedness
Tse petitioners application il srsnted.
Before Judge BRADY
Thomas l. Rrssss at George w Ger. -
Dafault SET aside without fsts 70 either patty. lne
70 have the right 20 answer within eo Gays
nc" Henry MoG.eiln "a. Alex ueKerz.s
No:scp to yaca;e iudgns,; grsntec'