New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-06-15
SUPREME COURT-SPEcnL TERM-JUyE lj.-Befors
Judgc MlrcHELL.

THE FRENCH RAILWAY FRAUDS.
The Northern Railway France est Charles CnPener'ta
The adjourned argument ON the order to show cause
why Auguste Parrot should not be discharged from
custody was continued to-day.
Mr. Marsh on behalf Of the Sheriff, objected to the
rec,utiou Of nGv sidavits which might be presented
by Nr. Townshcnd the ground that they were only
The Judge saw no reason why Mr.. Townshend
should not put in counter eda,ts to those presented
Nr. Galbrath then read the following ailidavits;
Fdousrd A. David Of the City ct New York makes oath and
M. reu.e IN the "a lay Of june 1851 the is
tue Che best knowledge Il icponent that depoaent We.
fellow prisoner win the ,ad Augstc Pact thatihc said An
suso Parrot confined with deP Lcn % Tue prisoner ana IN
II. oy.tody Of the Marital OF 4g United sta;es At 10
G., tlocr from he 27ih Day o. May l 70 IN" ~ Jay
e wi ch last day be d,oouen quilted me ee.
tod, Of the said horha and d,Pn~it ssy' that before t9e
,sid Ausu,ie Plot confined with dcgoue u custody
J Tar't w,Te impri.ntd IN the a in Eldrdse street aud
twcer the 18th 81 February and TIE @t e." May "1 gee
rort conveyed 20 different pisces within the City OF New
York, more than tnIt} TIM. rno,,,pn n,vtn
Affidavit Of John Tow shend and Benjamin. the counsel
ed attorney OF Parrot, was Zen resd , -, d.
1he n, svi, eci,e first the If Parrot the R)h Of
April 1850 By Sheriff order OF Judge of this Court
Psrct In the Eldrdgerett Jail until February 49, 1851 Soon
at, that N 1owuheud DESTROYS Of issuing haoea.
corpus TO bin Par before Superior orrt Jdee Il = ,has
tine De- erd'avor 10 ascertain who bad custody OF Paot and
he had rt:E' gn re ss . s TsIsa bs a.
ale any oeaaiiCu ss 20 which 81 them held PaTo Ia
clifton alton N I'D" object Il ia'lns farot IN '
oal 10 the Court by VIII 81 hsb pr
Il 1851 b. frequently Of The jail during the
pccetd the sYpcuon ton extrdti'n ANA that he IN
curd having ParOt aud the other prisoner, IN
chsi,e whether they hcd him Deputy shers or Deputy
hara thot the frst time he wa aos 10 GET 1ny Ien ~
rlratn VS., on The morning u Jun. when Parrot was I'M
prsored % No. College place tAe nded states oresh
MlEf Ryrtst Eating 20 hT IowI h tsa' he
United laws that lie yielded no obedience to any WI:
,S s,s oar % s ut NJ T5~H,hcnd waated
legality q the It inu.t De- ~ ~ o. 1s ,S
states that While b. PR pairing petition ior wri' o. ha64'
corpu be issued by United states Cont ne rrcey.d ~
Ma.s and csIh,d rack the custody Of toe shsrn Tie
then went the she!f' Once AMI mars s % vs. ,t
Norrs.b 0bs attorney u the Northern Railway Company
Ms.fP. CfFce end h. did So lie then inquired Of tho
sheriff he bad any warrant, oier 81 %iLM3 gu "h'Sp
isiev.d NJ IN Mir Mrroghs verbal order, thsr Mr. byr
rosh tie had gwen him release Or some ype Tor
cdv that H. Lad allowed Parot 70 be imPn'oned NJ
College place q, Mr. Morohs request Nh ToTn'hend sat,
the request If sir Mouosh referred To- bat the Sheriff
sout no fd lie release OF indemnity. Mr. To~usAeud fur
he ,sy that within hour ar the service OF the order -
sLow cause thi. matter M huosh sersed notice tass
the roceeg before the United States C0mnis.onsr would
BE- proced,d With that Parrot and i. fellow prisoner were
removed ~ Coete place IN oder th.t tAey i1z.' O
conveniently carried q ont q tins eonntfy 9ns ina s
Il thsn-L.us GTeet, be beiieYes~Ss e4rrga s"y y
sci, be huovleEe q Whist has come o. 1re
eacer from pubic rip9r ina, d. W" When he tat the
90 nd Ii INV u
FrtIe "a LoI sui denied IN his hearii = 80 .
81 wing ffdayit Of Nr Galbrsith confirms some
u III. .tsten,uts of hir TownsheIG's affidavit go - .
NJ Nouosh On behalf If the plaintiff then read tAe s'hlsy
Of at Rvdsrs United States Martha stating tAat Greet
s ,sly taken out country warrant o. ettra
Presd.ur Of Ii. United States AcronPa
trg liz ali al, VA copy Il the extraditon warrsnt
M Norroab then read AFFIDAVIT gDed Oy himself IL was
r.py to tn implied ,tatemeIt ~ me sb1s's rom lsns
AT b.t tie poceednzs Lad not been renewed before the
Ir-d Stats for the exffsoiton % Pafot until
r ualtif use had been served wfh an orcrf - ho
.. WHY the ~ suit against Parrot should no1 De dl.srd
Nj NOrOK that b. Application ipf 'Ohl e VI
-oe.drs. bef Mr. Commits Bert va made on the n
~ Jun. and "a pu Into u. hands II Bf Bets Oh het gay
IN II ususrs; 4th 81 June before O'Clock IN
tie month"; NJ Bett. ssud hi wsrranf % tne Lnteh Str
Marcia ectir bring PsTOt before hu on Tie On OF
Jun further examination m the ease 3 ~ t1'
- .,ryed or III. narshsl between and 10 0cloeki
h.t before II O'Clock Mr. hoTrOgh called a. TOE once OF ~
sbrh Psrots sttoney 20 nun VITA notice o. tns
beruz AID that found person there de waited na
M Gabgafhs ceTk informed him taat az Aths
b.d ben 70 M Morr0fhs Office IaSsrs
nm M N.roxbD which time BIZ Aorrozh did Nnt know
lei IL. nature u tie papers were and on sSias Al ma o.
6rr h. srusd for hrst time, that was a. andaft o.
Psrot aud notice tn motion in this Gaze In order 20 snow
NJ Tovp,herd then delivered brief iguras2t urging that
Parrot been zaly di.ehGrged from tbs custody o. the
sheriff wheu placed IN ch.ge Of the Uasd States Hu
hal the power and duty Of tn OoaTt % diehArse
NJ Msrh ou befsf Of the Sheriff SID A. the objsctn-
81 h 20 rromilelty the moving pspeTs-ths Parck
truttfd % alteud flpei lad Teen sbsndozs the
euy remaining question whether the plaintiffs attorney
bad SVEN any such would ente Parol 10 rs @
clarse the Of ss stef oO2eened taA
this upon and not s1a proeess that .n
sherfs duty discharged ne has the proner 20
fus process when IL .ha b. issue6 That Il the otoct
The dsnotisf between and hna PROF. n
4 the pT0aeS srrfstet upoR the former e'csPe INC