New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-08-31
La " INTELLIGENCE.

pertinent of receiver Of the property OF the O1io
Life and Trust Company. The motion vas made on
behalf Of the plaintiff represerted by Mr.. Chsr!e- e.
Mott whe appeared on bis behalf, with the consent OF
thu numerous other creditors, who have obtained a..
tsehmer.s and Of the Ohio Life and Tfss. Company
itself
The Judge referred the whole matter TO Dir. Wm
q. Russell. The following is he
ORDER OF REFERrNCE.
a Special Term, d. On Ii. verified comPiius in tvs sc-
Son and The Of the dindsnts tbs, receiver be
pointed and beans Chas C. Mott Of counsel i'r ne
Ordered Tha.h BE- referred to WIN c Russell .q coun:
siOr Of this Court ascertain whether VIM A Booth and
s asns s n. E; ss . RGs s s
ssd the Of security which the receiver receivers 70
ct s Be- ss5ss o
psny he surstes ard tie forn and execution Of the
TIVE ALLEGED DyFALoATIoE At THE ST. sIcHoLAs-
Mr.. TRxABwyiL Held TO EAR.
john NJ L.wIer ,gt John P. TresdwcI et.l
An order Of arrest was this morning granted in this
ssse against Mr.. Treadwel upon
mr. LAWYERS AFFIDAVIT.
g ead cSS7ty Of N f.ys loan ~, L,we ss nor
cesn wardrobe sud contents aud other articles per
nov n the possession Of the deedsu,. that the
hards Of the Sheriff Of said city and county, commonly d
The sion va. eomoened duly dems1ded such property
e deend,n eut they refused deliver the sane = him.
day refused deliver The to said Sheriff VINO had
JOHN NJ IAwLER.
WIZ. II. DUsEsBURY Commi,sioner Of Deeds.
ORDER OF ARREST.
i: 4: 5 sss
ChsmseIs .:Seet, the 50 day q sep.eTIsr, 1851
psted AusaA o. 1851 Justice Of the Supreme Court.
John P. Treadwel ct Of. agt John W. Lawler
An order requiring the plaintiffs in this case to show
sause upon the papers now before the Court why the
attachment previously granted against the defendant
should not be get aside was granted this morning.
Abont the same time that Mr.. LAWYERS counsel was
seeking 10 replevy The pcreonal property of Mr. Law
Ter in the possession of Mr.. Treadwel, the counsel Of
The latter obtained from Judge Peabody an attachment
against the same property.
WIN. M. Win arh, &c. agt. Mason A. Perkins
Motion dscbsse defendant from sraued with costs
Robt w. Lowber egt, John Garyey.-MOt0n Tor an
Before Judge MITCHELL
CszDeau sgt Mali, Croker agt Croker, Haggerty
OCT. Grspger-forms Of Judgment settled in each
SUPREME COURT-Aug. 2a--Before Judge STRONG
The morris Canal and Bs1hns Company Sst Peter Town
S. Is. STRONG, 1.-The plaintiffs are authorized by
the statutes of the State Of New jersey to construct
thelr Canal TO the line OF THIS STATE, the
County Of Orange. They found it necei sary, or a.
any rate convenient for their operations to construct
dam across the outlet of Long POnd or Greenwood
Lake, which created reservoir extending into aud
crossing of the lands of that county. The Leg
isafure OF this State, by an act pased on the llh of
April 1885, (Ch 800 authorized this Court to appoint
Commissioners to ascertain and determine the COM
pcneton which ought Justly to be made 10 the Of the
lands the taking of their estate the shall be
soned thereto E such reservoir and that On the action
and determination c COMMISSIONER sndh payment tender
psny sbs be vested With the title to The real estate taken aud
oil person: made parties to the shall be de:tcd
existence of the Company and from all claim demand
Of injury damage TO the real estate DuOusy affected
Of the lands be taken urouy affected By estab
bshg constructing the reservoir belong to the defendants
IsS 9Sts s4 Hs io1 Which
have applied the appointment Of commissioners
ascertain and determine the compensation to be sds TO tn"
~. from m' which the Attendant @ye appealed aud @ on.
contend the rider should be reversed and an On H."
assumption that the act Of our Legislature Unconstitutional
oontended that Legislature cannot authorize foreign
Corporation located in another State and subject to power
in this State belonging to s citizens There is ccr
sniy nothing IN our constitution vus restraining the OF
urged on the allegation Of ince mpstibly but ncompabiy
have recognized the exstcp &c Of foreign srious
ways aid granted to the many privileges this State We
authorize foreign Companies to transact business
th s9ae toIes CoPoraons may institute aint and
ih.rzed The RAP road Company Of another sahe New York
this STATE an acquire (couulsoy need b the title
the p TO the lands Of citizens in the County OF
knns ch privileges and rights have been deemed in
csres and Therefore void. 1t msh, have been well in
present have imposed conditions which
vNud enabled State Legislature 20 control o
odcety) the general operations OF the Company etec
fusy protect the interests Of the Of tins state That
Of tie Directors and CONSEQUENCES that would be Tor their
advantage promote the welfare Oi all whose interests
OF course parted WITH the right sisate as the use
that ps,t q The property Ct the Company which shall be
could without dcrOsstoD Yield to another State Ia egs
s TO S ss vitae IL e h Paw, Svt GP o" nd RS
Raovidhs folly foI tie interests q The people II such con
PIeheB that many o. them would fad
IL is objected that the operations Of corPoraon in another
& he sSOS onf 8, ns. %
the assumption Of their land, But why not canal
much a. toIninus-the remote full mu
other point We cssy see that it may benefit our pee
iced the and TO show that has not been exercised
ej an nS,Sy pe's1se Ns,issi our PaS5S VI" e
tuition conhdes the tight 10 Judge III that matter 20 at depart
The Mayor New ork seldom S1 Maet j. in giving the
opinion Of the Court. says Does it, 1.-THE right Of eminent
the time and tie ocs.cn and a. 70 what Paaa pf5pegy
k may be exercised Most certainly Goes, cm the very
As cthe extent Of the interest sud be acquired by
the Company that solely the consideration Of the Legs
lsiue The right 20 take property TO any extent whether full
aud entire title or only al easement implied IN the toGsha
rwa. made question The argument whether the term
property in the constitutional prov .ion Includes lht Of
aun for injuries proposed taken that
BE- included In the by the Commission. withou,
violation Of the right trial BY Jury; ain Inclined TO think
connected with the main subject and with the material
So' Of tshng IL ihst they may be included 1t close qoe
,'p admit s sf = nT shSSi the Ps a, - tie
in question without fl compensation the owners tor
then present loss eud hey are slo TO receive cncn