New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-11-02

K.D. Sight In tie south and b.s III. whole subject ss'r
befSte Congress.
Try O'Clock N.
Gov Waller VII no, be removed reprisaalss for the
e-vor co~nstted.
TIE eEstnAL SEw1Irt, DISPATCH.
WASHINGTON Oct. 81, 1851
TIE Gcverrmsu, has Official infsrnstou from Gov Walker
relative to h psns the pol Of Oxford Pecrc' and anti this
can De received there definite ston BY the Admins
tr.on. certainly violation hn instrSetOA' phfh
vN not BE- perned ssn0fieed dnd I've Ezeeuss di'ao
-sba'ien a Be pre"ed there 1, to believe % wan
,ehi way al ieo1 lead tie rssigraon Of both G0s
Wake. and Secretary Stanton.
|: h now aseersined specific inquiry that the report OF
l.s night which prevalent in usually reliable and we'll
informed circles Of the on part Of the Adn
ton Gov Walker and S. eretsy Stanton H. without
the lea. foundation Is there reason TO believe That
ether intends resign The last dates from either have only
come down to the 10Th Of October.
We DO not pretend to reconcile these conflict
ing reports; but on the main point-thas Of the
decided condemnst on Of Gov. Walkers course in
rejecting the OIfsrd return-there is entire agree
ment. That point being settled, all beyond is mat
ter Of course. The Administration will not dare
to remove Walker for bic one honest and manly
act in direct ful6llment of the express pledges Of
Mr.. Buchapan's Inaugural and Of bis party through
out the Free States in the canvass preceding his
eection-but bis head s in the basket all the same.
He has offended the dark Power whi,h rules our
rulers, and of which Mr.. Buchanan is tie facile
puppet, ard he must fall. He may be left to the
tender mercies Of the Border Ruffians, a Gov.
Gesry was, till he will be CAD to escape with bis
lfe; or be may be removed on false preteIt, as
Gov. Reeder vas or he may be nsulted and
bulied from Washington until he shall be glad to
reign; at all events, his time is short. We shall
not be surprised to hear hot he has been remo1ed for
enoourog ing The soldiers TO rote at KpkdPoo eon-
rory to the provisions Of the Kansas Nebraska act!
When thing is to be done, excuses for doing it are
always found-Or invented. A Democratic" Gov.
erDOr of Kansas Territory must be for Slavery oil
the time and must never ba'k at any Of its frauds
or outrsgee, however INDUSTRIOUS. If Walker
did not learn this from the fate of bis predecessors
be is now TO learn it frem bis own.
The preteIt Of the Administration for repudiatiDg
and censurpg Walker is absolutely shameful. See
the 4th section Of the Kansas Nebraska act:
1.-THE persons having highest number legal in ah
Of the sd COuI Districts for members Of the Counc shall
declared By the Governor to be duly elected to the Councils
Be duly elected member. Of said House"
Could anything be palmer than thisl What
means the word "kgai" above7 Why are the re-
turns referred to the Governor at all Is it not
clearly that be may correct any gross wrong COM
mi,ted in the polling or returning Of the vosesf
And if the pretended polling of over sixteen hum
dred votes st Oxford when only eighty eight votes
-.
yadere from Mi.souri-dees not require the exercise
Of the Governors power, what ,oouh justify iii
Who does not remember how Douglas & Co.
argued in the Senate, and their disciples in the
jour mails and on the stump, that the returns Of tho
6rt Legislative Election in Kansas March 30,
1867 must have been correct in the main, because
Con Reedsr did not reject Mem' Why didn't
"your Gov Reeder throw out these bogus votes,
{" if such they weIei was their constant inquiry.
1t was in vain We replied that the People of Kansas
we've not responsible for the mistakes of Gov.
Reeder, if such there wcre-thst Gov Reeder
could only act on evidence laid before him. and that
be did reject the returns in several instances where
such evidence Of fraud was sessonsbly furnished
that be was then acting as q satfap Of Pierce aud
jeff Davis, and could bot be expected TO 90 out Of
hi. way to hunt up evidence Of corruption on the
palt Of their supporters. Still, the cry was kept
up" Why didn't Gov. Reeder reject the fraud
ulent returns2" and it was urged that Congress
was "estopped from going behind retarns
which he bad sanctioned. Now, see what is said
by authority in depreciation of single act justice
BY Federal Governor to the long abused People Of
Kansas. When will another Governor venture TO
oppo.e the contamination of any fraud, however
mop.trouf. whereof they are the victims