The Ottawa free trader. [volume] (Ottawa, Ill.) 1843-1916, 1857-06-06

|
81. Plato vs.. TurriH. Error to Peoria.
Affirmed.
90. Spaids VS.. Cameron. Error to Cook.
Continued.
90. Bishop vs. Neuton ct al. Appeal from
Kane.-Continued.
100 Pilkington ct al vs. Ford. Appeal
from Bureau.-Rcversed and remanded
101. Harmood vs.. Kierstea. Error to
Grundy Co. Court-Afirmed.
102. Grey VS.. Lott ct al. Appeal from
Grundy.-Affirrned.
103. HcIntire vs.. Benson ct ais. Error to
Cook Co. Court Of Common Pleas-Conti-
nucd
/ 1o4. WazIer ct al. vs.. Reslrich. Appeal
from McLean.-U nder advisemcnt.
Jog. ComStock VS.. Gregory. Appeal from
Peoria.-DisIpssed.
Continued.
los. County Of Peoria rs. Hurley. Ap-
peal from Allirmed.
100. County Of Peoria vs.. DeJooa APP
peal from Peoria-Undcr advisemcnt.
10. Coanty IF Pcorta VS.. Gorelon. Ap
peal FROM Peoria-Under advisement.
! III. County IF Peoria w. Na,han. APP
peal from Peoria-Under AMUSEMENT
IlA- I0o0tt " eC!S~ W. SOhNs0b nj
peal from PeoriA-Under ADJUSTMENT.
113. Connty y Peoria w. Harley. APP
peal from Peoria-U ndor Amusement.
ia. County Of PeOria VS.. NsCoy APP
peal from Peoria.-Under adysement.
lis. Comfy OF Peoria VS. SmiM. APP
peal from Peoria.-Under advisement
1l6. Peters VS.. .SpilLnsan. Error to Peo-
ria-Afiirmcd.
III. Wilson ct ais. VS.. Sterling Uydraultc
Co. Appeal from Whiteside.
11s. Hurd VS.. Shan Appeal from Cook
Co. Court Of Common Pleas-Continued
! 1l9. Bank Of Peru We. Fa,nsuorM. Ap-
peal from La Sale Co. Court-Reyersed and
/ remanded.
.12O. Chumasero VS.. TIE People, Appeal
from La Sale.-Afiirmcd.
l2l. Archdale VS.. Koore ct al Appeal
from ria.-Continued
I22. Waterman ct al vs. Tattle ct ais.
! Appeal from Cook.-Afirmed.
/ 123. Harrood ct al. vs. Tucker ct ais
Appeal from Cook Co. Court Of Common
Pieas.-Under advisement
! 1874. SctooHhOreH VS.. Colt. Appeal from
Kane.-CoEtinucd.
/ l25. City Of Chicago VS. MAJOR. Appeal
from Cook Affirmed.
! 1876. Hunter 1t ais vs. Blanchard. Ap-
peal from Peoria Reversed and remanied.
1877. Gregg IS. frqser. Appeal from Peo-
ria.-Contnued.
128. Grors V. Carlisle. Appeal from Pc
oria.-Reverscd and remandcd
1873. Dabcock VS. Tree. appeal from
Warrcn.-ReveIs and reruandcd.
$50. Nar@ing IS. EItts. Appeal from
Warreu.-Ailirmed.
l3l. Himjrecht IS RlJensteiu. Error to
Cook Reversed.
1872 Eeil,gg etals. vs. Carr et-.l. Error
TO Warren.-Coutinucd
1873. heilogg ct al. vs.. PiIlsJury. Error
to Warren-Continucd
1874. Nzrtirk ys. Cone. Appeal from
Cook Co. Court Of Common plcas.-Af-
frraed.
I85. Garrett ct al. VS.. Nos. Error to
Tazewe!L-Contiuucd
1876. Spier ct al. V. A7ery Ct a.. Error
to Peor.a.-Contiaued.
1a-. BrooI, ". B-uyr. Appeal from
Warren.-Unaer adysement.
1873 Merritt V. Merritt. Appeal from
La Sallc.--Coat'uucd
1879. Ros, ct al 81. DER Ct a. Agpca,
from Cook Co. Court Of Common Pleas
Under advisemcrt.
40. EZdrjags Is. Hol,5os. Appeal from
Cook Co. Court Of Common P.eas.-Rsvers-
ed and roman1cf.
l4l. C.icogo, Burlington, AID Gyi"ey Z.
r. Co. W. Co!.mag ct al.-Re"ersed and re
man ed.
143. Eitcic9-Lv vs.. Ba.s57 q as. Appeal
from 10 Dayiess.-Aflirmed.
Ia SHEPARD vs. G9oden0ugt Ct al. Ap-
peal from La Sallc.-Continued.
l4J. Chicago aud Aurora T. r. Ca. IS
Thompson. Appeal from Kane.-Continued I.
a.: Chse"yo, O'.' s'ys-'s, o.s.tF G,af'.,y Il. .
Il. Co vs.. DtlHning. Appeal from Kane
Dismissed.
III. Chicago, Burlington, md Quiacy r. .
r Go. VS.. Paris. Appeal from kane.-Re- .
versed and reIranded.
lis. Brorrn ct al. VS.. Welsh. Appeal from
La Salie.-U Eder AMUSEMENT.
I49, Deaar VS. BiaeI1ctH Appeal from
La Salle-AtiirmcG
80. Ayres vs.. Clinttelter Appeal from
La Sale.-Coutinued.
15l. Duffy vs.. NcQu:,!ian. Appea, from
10 Dayiess.-D Dismissed.
1872. Garter IS. HcigIea. Appeal from
10 Daviess.-Dismissed.
1913. Ro5'nson rs. Merry. Appeal from,
10 Daviess.-Disnissed
154. Set=ier VS.. .SaroHi. Appeal from
Cook nder advisement.
155. Gu-l.y ct al. W.. Sutherland Error
TO toOh.-l nncr amusement.
156. EsmGy vs.. Negus. Appeal from
157 Pome-oy ct al. vs.. Roberts. Appeal
from Cook Co. Court of Common Pleas
Reversed and remanded
15S Griffin VS.. Httckum. Appeal from
Cook Co. Cour. Of Common Pleas-Revers-
cd and reInanded.
l59 Zimmermaa VS.. Wead. appeal from
100 Eaton ct al. vs. Bryan Error to Pc
16l Cook VS.. Hipmdn Appeal from
Cook Co. Court of Common Pleas-Revers-
ed and rcmanded
162. Eastman vs.. Nul, Error to Kane
Continued.
lG3. Hough VS.. Hastings. Appeal from
La Salle-Atfirmed.
1914. Day vs.. Hackney. Appeal from
Kane.-Continued.
lG5. Dgtch IS. FrinE ct ais. Appeal from
Kane Continued.
100. Far,oeu vs. LOutter. Appeal from ,,
Cook.-Affirmcd.
167. Reed VS.. Eams. Error to La Sale
Co. Court.-Coptinued.
16S Bic Cornick VS.. Tate. Appeal from
Cook Co. Court Of Common Plcas-Conti- |
lued.
169. EaXer vs.. Wadanorth. Appeal ,
rom Cook Co. Court of Common Pleas
Continued.
10. baltimore ct al. VS.. Lors ct al. APP
peal from Kane.-Dismissed.
III. Bartholomew VS.. Bartholomew. Err =,
or to Peoria-Reversed and remanded.
1T2. Chicago and Nilsoaukis x. Il, Go. VS..
BILL Error to Lake-Continued.
173. City Of Peoria vs.. Bosnian. APP
zeal from Peoria.-Dismissed.
1T6 Lee VS.. Neukirk. Appeal from Cook
20. Court of Common Pleas Affirmed.
1T. Comstock VS.. Gregory. Error to Pc !
ia.-Continued. J
17s. Rees VS. Edmes Error to Cook Co.
rourt of Common Pleas Continual