Daily Nashville patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1857-1858, 1857-11-25

10 Evans ct al W Shivers;
II Martin VS. Armstrong;
Is Turnpike V Spence;
&c Aye ct al vs. Gilbert;
II Davis VS. Moseiy:
Is Turnuike Co vs. Spence;
~ Hughes VS. Gilbert;
20 Allen W. Goodrich;
q Goldburg vs. Hinton;
% Mckee, A mr. vs. Noel;
q Mckee, Admir- vs. Noel;
% Johnson vs. Radcliffe;
p Same vs. orion, ct al;
20 Sloan Ex " Halle;
u Wilson Ex. vs. McGehee;
2S Dune n 4 Co vs. Plummer
a Co;
% Same vs. Same;
80 Same vs. Same;
81 townsend VS. Harris;
81 Turnpike VS. Spence,
50 S.oan vs. Warne;
81 Rad Dad vs. Lowe;
35 Joiner VS. Taylor;
SO White Rec VS. Anderson.
a Warner VS. Leake ct al;
IS Childress vs. jackson;
SO Briggs ct al rs McEwen;
- Mckee vs. Johnson ct al;
4 On Idress rs AIaddux ct al;
~ Alloway ct al vs. = amp
bell;
80 Craig vs. Ware;
~ Grader ct al vs. oltar ;
10 Matthewson VS. Phillips;
40 Jackson VS. Bell;
A Anthony jr, vs. acksOn;
IS Bolton ct al VS. hi bro;
IS Bradley vs. Ed undson;
o enL Lessee vs. Higgins;
81 Ensley VS. Vance;
y May or 4 Aid vs. JeffTies;
53 Polk vs. Elliott;
81 STAG er, tr VS. Napier;
; Faulkner VS. Railroad;
IS Watts G al vs. Payne;
81 gilmore vs. P rter ct al;
; Brown use &C, vs. Gray;
80 70 ker vs. Bass;
90 Peacock & 20 vs. Bugg
ct al;
a. Knight vs. Sloan
60 stout vs. Leake ct al;
63 Price vs. 5 aughter ct al;
Ga Web vs. Ledbetter ct al;
% Embry ct al vs. sumner
ct III;
&c Thomas vs. Griffi h;
g. Auders n vs. Porter ct al;
5 Farnsworth ct al VS. Rob
ert-On ct a;
SO Fain, admir-, vs. Newsom;
70 Bank vs. Roscoe ct al;
Pad week.
II Bank vs. Polk ct al;
y Same V Same;
% A der.On vs. Moore;
"A Strattou Il al vs. Coach
etai;
= Brown vs. Turner ct al;
70 Hy t v II de;
y Woodruff vs. Railroad;
Is WetmO e vs. SamuelS;
20 Rob rtsOn ct al vs. Bank;
s. anne vs. Fite et al,
II Cameron VS. Sloan;
So AWAY ct a, VS. Elmer
man;
IS yron vs. Johnson ct al;
81 Smith vs. Topp;
- NcWright vs. Alen fee;
&c HO.lins a Co vs. Plummer
& Go
81 Hem Y W Faulkner;
IS lark vs. Sit pson;
50 Foster & Co vs. Summer
hll q admir-;
90 Williams, admir-, vs. VIII
sou;
OF Powers vs. Franklin;
o. Scott tt al vs. andy
g. W Us Il al vs. Bank;
a N'ayOr 4 Al ex Parte;
IS Brown VS. Foster;
g. Bowles al vs. Leake el
al;
81 Goodbare vs. Sa e;
9 b ker CT al vs. Same;
80 Chi on vs. Same;
/ pU Will ms ct al v Same;
10 Neal v Kimbro;
l"Z Mo re vs. Ledbetter ct L
iO3 johnson ct al vs. Maxwell
ct al;
1OI Guthr VS. Holt ct al;
60 . Abby " Same;
IOj Me iayo K vs. Tindal eI
al;
1O7 Cartwright VS. Tucker e
al;
los Aob y VS. Shute;
l09 Do glass vs. Joyce ct al;
10 , ea vs. Barns;
II Powell W Pit
2 Bu Ter " Thurmend;
3 Wo druR vs. ThaXtOn;
1 4 Di, mukes ct al rs Camp
bell;
il5 Same VS. Same;
10 Witty vs. Ellis, use, &C;
III BE " vs. Co pOra ion;
is Burke vs. AcAiu;
ll9 Brusher VS. ampbell;
l2u Whirley vs. Wetmore ct i
1 1 amerOn ct al vs. Wet
more;
1872 Q endergrast& Coy We Wor
ley;
1913 Cardwell, admir-, vs. Bren-
men ct al.
1874 Shu c vs. Underwood;
rs Trabue ct a vs. Ledbetter
ct al;
l26 D=sha VS. Merrett ct al;
I Bank VS. Rayb I'm ct al;
l2S Snowden vs. Cover
l y kirkpatrick ct al Vi
Young ct al;
IS Erwin vs. NetwoTe;
l3l Ha vs. Nance;
1872 t5le4yes vs. Sumner ct al;
I 3 Railroad " Cunningham
l 4 Kimbro. use &C, vs. nim,
tro,
IS No gan. use &C, vs. John
sOu et al;
1856 same vs. same;
1877 Stewart vs. Cemetry;
1873 Beatty vs. ClOdfelter;
1879 Dunn vs. kn der;
i4u Raj road " Don lson;
al Living ton W Gas Light
90;
142 Moore W Hughes;
1913 Gilman vs. rlgut;
a Halle & 20 vs. Bridge Co
1t5 Young vs. SummerliP,
adm r;
l46 Brigham ys Hays ct al;
l4T B8cnus vs. Porter,
t45 G1ldburg vs. insurance
Co;
l49 Smith vs. Bells ex'rs;
49, NJ Whirte W Doug as;
l5i Lytl e. al We Bush;
< Murrell ~ Corporations
lo3 Morgan & Co vs. Wick
houn;
ia Hobbs l. Co vs. Stull;
ISo ngston vs. corpora
tion.
l56 Ly tie ct al vs. Foster &
90.
l5I Eusley W Vance;
8, ia es vs Smith;
l59 Kelly g al " Overton ct
at;
leo Lusk vs Vance;
81 Stratt0u " Peek;
1862 5 stl e " Davis,
ii2 Pee v POs {. rfield;
l68 akin 3 20 ys Wetm0re
e. al;
les waters " Kills et al;
I'D Week.
100 MAYO 3 90 " Noel et AZ;
l6f Carter vs Poster e al;
los Nann0y vs. Beaumont;
lt9 Pc way W McR0beFt-;
10 Bedford We Lasrrnce ct
"a
III Rum~ey " Hamblia;
ls3 Fuller - Wetmore e. al,
lt3 Anderson ys Smiley et al
Ia Mar " Davis,
l55 Bank v Demumbrane e..
al;
l56 sa-e " Gosss
THO
BY ID
Nashville, Nov i2 doH8t.