Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-03-17

NOTICE.
Talliaferro, and others, Gon.plainan'''
~, 49,. u. p J.
Patrick, and others. Dsfsndont'. .
- Il IN, CHANCERY. ....
ITO Alexander G. Taliaferro and Agnes.
Il his wife, William Marshall, Mary M.
Archer, Fielding. L. Marshall. James T.
Jones and Ann L.. his wife. Jahn 4.
Smith and Margaiet L., his wife, Thomas
Marshall, Eliza Marshall, Robert L. Dou.
that and Mary A., his wife. Mildred p.
Marshall, Jacqueljne A. Marshall, Elliot
NJ. Braxtoh. and Am NJ his wife, Ellen
NM arshall, Jfacqucline B. HOWE, Mary
Hewie' Ellen HoIic, Anderson Wade,and
Susan, his wife, w. NJ. HOWE. Ann How
ir, Jpo.. Marshall, "A. Marshall JAS. f.
Marshall, Fielding Douthat and MaryfW ;,
his wife, Jas. K. Marshall. ,Edw.,C. Mar
shall, Jannet r. Harrison, Geo. D. Fisher,
Lucy NJ. Norton, .Edw. G. Fisher, &c.
Kenney and Mary A., his wife, Merry
Fisher, Raleigh Colston, Ann +. Colsten,
James G., Paxton: Jas. w. .Massie, B.ts1.
Jordan, Samuel +. Jordan. George Fish
er suryiyi1gtxeeutor Of Ell. Canning
ton, decd, George F. Harrison, edward
! u HARRISON Carter. H. Harrison and
Henry Harrison plaintiffs, and .Spicer
Patrick and Virginia his wife, Aaron
Stockton, William Tompkins, j DEL Shrewsr
bury; William Dickinson; Samue! Steele
Robert C. Steele, John Alexander, Sam.
uel Alexander, Susan c. Thornton, Ann
NJ. Wilson, Barbara Wilson, Sally VIII,
son, Ann G. Marshall, - Marshall
Emily HOWE, Mary Fisher, Lucy G.
1 Fisher, Susan L. Colston, William S
Wilson, Betty A. Fitzhugh, Mary A
Harrison, Margaret l.. Marshall, Fanny
Marshall and John Marshall defendants
in the above Chancery suit: b.. ".
Take Notice, .~ y
That at the Fall Term 1856, of the Circui
Court for Kanawha Co. and State Of Va.
a decree was rendered in the above cause
ordering, among other things; a referenc,
Of said cause to John L. .Mosely Esq,
Special Commissioner for that purpos,
appointed, with instructions to report up
on the tide of the land mentioned in til,
>, Billand sought TO be divided and part
toned in said cause, embracing the fol
lowing enquiries, to wit - 49,.
t.lst. Whether the claim Of title, t
John Steele nineteen thousand FIVE hun
Edred acre survey, is correctly stated in tn
Bill. 49,. ~ .:>><s9 - -.
j end. Whether the several interests o
the present owners OF said tract of Ian,
are correctly ascertained and setout in th
Bill. -,.s.@ 80. ~. 'a.55z.r-l' !. !
80. What is the interest of each own
| er in the whole tract? 4
4th. What is the interest of each OWN
: erSto whom lot B., is assigned, in sal
10th. E.zH3ssu - :, assl- +. E..7l x
9Th. What is the interest of eachown
4 er, to whom lots c. and Z. are assigned
n in said lots c. and E. t.. p ez&' r.,
9th. And that said Commissioner r,
s port any such other and further matte
4 as te him may seem proper or any of tn
j parties require. pl+- r; - 81.
:, And take notice, tllatI have fixed upo
!, Monday the 18th day ofJanuary 1851 i
" the time, and the Office Of Parks. an
Moselg in the town Of Charleston Count
y of Kanawha and state of Virginia. as II
II place, for complying with the foregoin
acquisitions of said Decree, at which tin
and place any of the parties who thin
e proper may attend. la .'oi4 4
q . t.o,..} !, John L. MosELY.
SPECIAL ocnmissiensg.