New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-11-10
SUPERIOR CoURT-TarAL TERa-Nov. 9-Before Juds
SLoss0x

sLossoS
ch.,ss Coleman and JoLn Gardner sgt Lemuel Wells.
This was an action by the plaintiffs, VINO couposeo
the firm Of Coleman Gardner Co. RIO De Js.sIo e re-
S r. r S as ss1 ssssu int the
B51 100 1s ss Sp1S "" q
that country for 500 pirs zach alleged 70 aass h,anss
the A Mich s b sss n .sse' d.
hon was he esimony OF defendant that he ineosed IN
Letter ADD to az s. ssr IN he Poe. c.A.
lines BE aso produced what purpotsd 70 oes COPY y. US
letter in his letter boot, aud se'aed
oft
defendant also testified that letter vas received By him
h the Plaintiff. bearing date the 18Th OF March ~ 1
eemapcsa Of him the plaintiff. were sovdt prove M
thar By pSdSp ns ss . e
RIO spd he defepdsrt testified that VS. such and further
stated the original contained postscript Which did not sp
The dsSds1 having to oe. fact: tsndns =
,,eS 10, s 10 prove Il. without produe
defendant testified under the objection OF tes an.
anssrh .s .pS sInwsrd the receipt BY the psnt. q
hi, letter them Of the ifh Of March aud Of the re"saes
sle ned 10 have been contained IN H.
II wa. proved Tor the psnss hst on the sd Of September
S u de Jspeo account hsyine been stated estwesa
The Psa. t T ,b. 's IN american oS oen
end they offered In evidence certsin Dc oootion
de Jsneiro under sop, for the purpose ~
ne cpi,.cp 10 bst sccout, charge against the d'saasnt
for the proceeds Of the coal. A..
thee dsPoons pps6 s. i Ssa zen sSsus.d a
tlst The emission rs,utsd from that event.
MA
IN ~ - s.ssd 10 have been made BY defendant then
on The 1h f March hot 10 fact made letters OF the de-
fpespt to the Plaintiff besps date on the OLE ana eh
Atr md on :he sh Of MAY 1885 respectively contrasting "a
nsps their sysrsl dstes the balance o. sccouns ee
tw. them IN the paIniihs syof sud maAns
Tor the ssyment Of such balance and also the copy OF INC
ter Of April in the def pdan letter boot as
two D,. IN the Ddsnts handwriting not found 70 we ~
IL wbch stated admitted tia; balance was 90 a"'
plsintfs. a, A., ..x.S.,t mani.
fe.,ed On surprise hen aie on, ss .ns
the plsi1 f.' books bssnce du. 20 nin fo
letter pvrpor'inE 10 be from The 70
80 mn The ,tsrd ard be having been a.sso ny.
It u fact written BY him. sara '"S
,,os. az ppeschipr the credbify o. we %
S,,. bole evidence snd a prov,nf we cs ~ b.nd
~ stter Nh. evidence Of witnesses "a ,as,sss
wItrg d the defendant $40 sps ,Ssy testified belief
=. n the zsnuine bsnd srtins o. voc ~
MAJ ~ 10 been deposited in the Pos'omee 81 osas
rirs' testified that be bad had no tnowledss
az the copy Of bis letter Of the OH OF April
the plaintiff not fouIa N tes hm and tSs csnsf
tpen the dsfrpdsnts house In Astoria 10 harcn lso g
hb Ire letter book exhibited 20 hr osonei 70 tne e
having refused 70 testify th tney werS
@ t,,u BIZ him. for the parpose Of further imPesenin{
49, sbity Of the defendant witness and 70 prove test
he lines were written BY him. the evidence OF witnesses 80
sines and they testified hs, they believed the two nss
4. iI dsf ucant's own handwIitirG -, ...,,.t
TIE defer cant IN lis Get mp counter cis ~.
The plaintiffs fer the Of soI'o 10 Md nossi ssvojvs
csuss should be referred the ground thss weua ~
"a, ex,unstio Of long accounts but sPpesr. verstn
particulars Of the claim were TIE
psDes srd defendant Rio In s, on the sti
was denied, and the wa trtst estStes IVY
a sna In S.Ss, NV s,s.ion Of Court brought
.u.eIsl y.Sc ard tuad that remittance ssse 20
hen made on tb~ Iah OF Mscb, 1855 YVES n.s 1900 Al
not received. and tAss LEO sei' arc eS'~ " '