Arkansas true Democrat., 1857-09-08
Cases Decided in the Supreme Court q, the State of Arkansas, at the JuIu
 Term 1857 uiy

CaSes DeCloeo Tn the Supreme Court of Term, 1857. '"y
 No. 1.-Wynn vs Garland Appeal from, Lafayette. Affirmed Opinion per HanIv I
 No. 5.-Wilson vs Anthonv.-Appeal fron, Pulaski. Reversed Opinion per English. c r
 No. 7.-Butler Vs Reardon ct al.-Annooi from Pulaski Affirmed. Opinion per EnrIisb c. J.
 No. 9-Shields vs Trammell ct al-Anro,, from Sebastian. Affirmed. Opinion per Iian' ' ly,J.
 No. 9.-Trapnall adx vs Brown.--An,o,, from Pulaski. Affirmed. Opinion per En- gish, c. J.
 Mo- 12--Denson ct al. vs Thompson. An peal from Ashley. Reversed. Opinion np. p English, C. J. P''
 No 15-Daniel vs. Guy, ct al-Anra., from Ashley. Reversed. Opinion Der 'ES"' Fr gsh, c. J. A1u'
 Mo- 2l--Rector ct al. vs Gaines ct a-A peal from Hot Spring, Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 Mo- 23. Walsh vs Frank.--Error to Cbco, Reversed. Opinion per Scott J.
 Mo- 26-farrell vs flll.-Appeal from pr laski. Reversed. Opinion per lanlv J,
 No 28-Danels ct al. vs Lefevre,-Annool from Pulaski. Affirmed. Opinion per Han ly, J.
 No. 34--Wlliams vs Cheatham.--AppeaI from Hempstead. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No. 37.-Berry ct al. vs Diamond exr.-An. peal from Phillips. Reversed. Opinion Der Scott, J.
 No. 43-Hunter vs Gaines & wife, ct al-- Appeal from Hot Spring. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No. 44--MHls ct al. vs Gaines & wife ct aI | Appeal from Hot Spring. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott,J.
 No. 45 5--Hae vs Gaines & wife ct al-Ap. peal from Hot Spring. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No 46-Schweitzer vs Gaines & wife ct al. Appeal from Hot Spring Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No 62-Fagan, Finl Recr. vs Stilwell.- Appeal from Pulaski Affirmed. Opinion per | English, c. J.
 No 63-Temple ct al. vs Lawson.--Appeal from Union. Reversed. Opinion per Hauly, J..
 No. 65.--Tatum ct al. vs Tatum.--Error to Union. Affirmed Opinion per Hanly, J.
 No. 66.-Oswalt exr. vs Moore.-Appeal from Phillips. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No. 73.-Patten ct al. vs Wagner ct al.-Ap- peal from St Francis. Reversed. Opinion per | Scott, J.
 ] | Clark. Affirmed Opinion per Hanley, J. I No 8O.-Shel ct al vs Martin.-Appeal i from St. Francis Reversed Opinion per l IIany, J.
 No. 9O-Spence vs Dodd.-Appeal from Clark Affirmed. Opinion per Hanly, J. No 94--Butts vs King ct al.-Appeal from Johnson. Affirmed Opinion per Hanly, J. No 96-Cruson ct al. vs Whitley. Appeal from Franklin. Dismissed. Opinion per Scott J.
 No. - Phelan ct a vs Farmer.-Appeal from Washington. Affirmed.
 No. ll8- Hill vs Austin.-Appeal from Ouachita Affirmed Opinion per Scott, J.
 No. ll9.-Richardson vs White. Appeal from Franklin Affirmed. Opinion per Scott, J. No. I33.-Hopper vs The State.-Error to Yell. Reversed Opinion per Hanly, J. No. 134-Parker vs The State.-ErTor to Yell Reversed. Opinion per Hanly, J. No. l38.-State use Ferrill v5 Norris ct al- Error to Ashley. Reversed. Opinion per English, c. J.
 No. l45-State use State Bank vs Carroll ct al.-Appeal from Pulaski. Affirmed Opn- ion per Scott, J.
 No. 147.-Carroll vs Harris.-Error to Yell, Affirmed Opinion per English, c. J. No. 148-Rector vs. Harris, ct al.-Error to Pulaski Dismissed. Opinion per Scott, J.
 No l56-Reasoner vs Brown-Appeal from Yell Remitttur per part affirmed as to resi- due. Opinion for Hanly, J.
 No. 157-Lemon vs The State.-Appeal from Conway Affirmed. Opinion per Hauly, J.
 No. l75--Grimes ad. vs Booth.-Appeal from Sebastian. Affirmed. Opinion per Eu- glish, c. J.
 No. 176-Grimes ad. vs Booth.--Appeal from Sebastian. Affirmed. Opinion per En- glish C.. J.
 No. 177.-Keefe vs The State.--Appeal from Sebastian. Affirmed. Opinion per Eu- glish, c. J.
 No 178.--Burton vs Feild ct al.--Error to Pulaski. Affirmed Opinion per English, C. J.
 No. 199.--Neely vs Robinson ad.-Appeal from Jackson. Affirmed. Opinion per Eu- ssh, c. J.
 No. 18o.--Burr & Co.,, vs Ross S Leitch.- Error to Independence. Reversed. Opinion per English c. J.
 No. l93--Sessions vs Peay, Rec'r-Appeal from Chcot. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott J.
 No. 1S4 Sessions ct al. vs Peay, Recr.- Appeal from Chicot. Affirmed. Opinion per Scott J.
 No. 192-Warren vs The State.-Appeal from Ouachta Affirmed. Opinion per llan- ly,J
 No. 193.--Sweeden vs State.-ARpeal from Conway. Reversed. Opinion per uanly, J.
 No. 195-Trapnall adx. vs Craig. Error to Phillips. Affirmed. Opinion per English, C.J. Mo- 2O4--Green vs The State.-Appeal from Jefferson. Reversed. Opinion per English, C. J.
 No. 2O6-Meyer vs The State.-Appeal from Pulaski Reversed. Opinion per En- glish, c. J.
 No 2O7--Bales vs The State-Appeal from Marion. Reversed. Opinion per Hauly, J.