New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-02-14
law INTELLIGENCE
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT FEE IL
Before Judge ISGERsoLL.
IHE MUSTANG LIsIMENT IN LITIGATION.

THE MUSTANG LIsINEST IN LITIGATION.
John d. Park and al. sss Addison j. Brsss and Al
This suit is instituted for the protecnon OF me no'ed
Mexican Mustsng Linimen', and will probably pre-
sent somewhat similar questions to tose which were
passed upon recently in the Superior Court in the csses
touching the Balm Of Thousand Flowers.
The plaintiffs allegations are. that Geo. ". YVES.
brook the original Inventor of the Mustang Linment,
went into partnership with A. j. Bragg one OF the de-
fer dants for the purpose of its manufacture thst ey
subsequently, sod their whole interest IN 1t 70 the
plaintiffs but that in vOlati IN OF his agreement with
Them Bragg in connection with the other defendants,
commenced at St. Louis the manufacture of an article
essentially tie same as that which he had sold the
plsntf., calling it the Attic Liniment.
The hea ing on the application for preliminary In
uLcti6n u, IL set down for the I'D inst.
THE sIcKELs CUTOFF.
VIM ss M GsSsa EH.s St Sad AND s: az: sesaI Sean
thip Company Same aSt latham g. BroA !,
The plaintiff applies for an Injunction IN VARIOUS
suits against several psres on the ground tnas tney
have infIipged the patent Of I'm. Is. Sickess c0'on,
b, the use Of Allen & Weiss cutof.
preliminary Injunction was this morning Issued a.
prayed for. Judge Inger'oll delivering an esoorae
onnion in which he first recited the action Of Slckels
act Borden IN which the jury had found verdict for
plaintiff and the fact that Judge Nelson bad been sat
ned With that verdict, and had graned an ioJunctton
thereon lie then proceeded to state nat the mscnaes
in these cases except in the case OF the steamer Al
ousta were identities al with the cutoff In the stropo
and therefore that there was no reason why al IN
junction should not issue. 49,.
In respect TO the Augls,s tne TUT ~ ~ :; tha
a. the parcular form Of The cut of was ger iortn 10 the
hin and Mr.. Horstio Aiken, witness for defendant.
did not deny that as stated as thst torn OF CUT.
off was alleged in the bill to be Substantially the same
a. that ented BY Sicke and it appeared BY the
charge Of Judge Nelson. that the independent motion
40 liner ATE The steam valves the essence OF the IN
vention patented by SickeI ii evident that the
cut. of on the Augusta was also an infringement
thereof An injunction was therefore ordered In al
these cares.
M benedict for Mr. Mitchell then applied for leave
10 give security to respond in damages ana run tne
Augusta without the Injunction, but the mouoh was
denied. -. J.. ~
Mr.. Dickerson then offered TO give leave % Mr..
Mitchell to run the Augusta il he would pay si2 asy
for The use of the cutoff; saying tnat u We no mr.
Sickes desire to put defendants to any inconvenence
ore than to pay for his machine; sDd the order was
n ade for an Injunction unless defendants would pay
So.
SUPREME COURT-sPEcIAL Trxs-PEk l5.6s'oss 'uoses
MITCHELL, RoosEvELr and DAVIS.
Observation-Disclosures OF RECEIVER.
Pe,.r Loril.ard srt NugsrettA A. LorllArd, ef
beam receiver OF certain