The Davenport daily gazette. [volume] (Davenport, Iowa) 1856-1869, 1857-03-30
REPUBLICAN TICKET.
~ j.1e.,asp--ils psty q Rspu. lis.as.


ne yuAessAtp --1ks Dsu Of Rspat lissas.
We caaaot permit our most excellent
.assheor ofthe Democrst to dodge from the |
asfensiss 10 the aggressive. By aussias the |
Gazette before the people Or us party ss
The criminal ~hea We have The Demoera'
alresdy on the stand. In connection with
THE whole Judgeship matter, the Gazette
- pesformed lie duty faithfully and tear
lessiy Its has moreover been sastaned BY
lie party Not man OF the party, Of The
sisshseet prominence or influence as
ci,isen, II We may except several Jaw
yers, directed to 81 found iauii Win our
course in claiming il TO be the sa'y O 'ns
Republicans t. make regular aoa'.aausa
fos Dsuict Jsdge II 10 the lace OF 'hs
ct, dat in every State IN tae Union "aef,
is1jcial olEcers ere elected by the people,
- Democrats sspsrssby make nominations
81 The Jadgeship wherever thew have ma
joriy. and sssxr demand that politics SHAH
hs tArowa sside excep, where The Democra'
- l. in the minority. and that their mach'-
,etisns and ,rickery even in this District %
seexrs Judge Of their own party wnese
.Asy could not succeed BY bold and square
pary nomination, were we'll saown-we
cav, II in the face OF these facts nane-tensas
Of the Republican party had objesiedt to our
e,urse, their remonstrances would have
been anayailing in preventing y faithfully
Gschsrgins our da,s But on ihe sehtrsfy'
ear course va eery generally apPFo'ed.--
The Republicans saw the plain path Of oa'
~ ~ q re did. What the Democracy
,he.eh, or said wss nothing to Republicans
:. "a thu Gazette. The Republican nomi-
,esiae Convention was called, and here cur
Ausv cea,ed till tina, body shoul have made
il nemination. Whatever errors 'his Con-
ven,ion may have committed, Toe respohsi-
kifey does not belong to Us We did not
..tend The Convention, nor did We advocate
H. claims Of any man for the nomination,
sscsp, % far A. the suggesting o. one
naa,a. which vas withirswn bsiore the
Coaysn,ion. We did our duty in demand
inn that such Convention should be held,
asd Ne gave reason. ios the policy which
ne,,her Democrat nor Republican could
overcome. We have no regrets for our
course. Uadsr similar Circumstances we
should and we shall do the same thing
again. n...:..
A fur the nominee o. the Convention
re have lad but little to say about him. he
comes recommended to Us as nan OF high
shiEsy. OF thorough legal experience and o.
integrity. Personally. 10 objection can DC
urssd against him. He is al least as compe-
eat q his opponent. Politically, no man
Isrs cav he Is not Republican, nor can
say without being guilty Of : direct false
hood, tbs, he eve, wal Know Nothing
He voted for Fillmore, ss probably almost
any other Republican would have done, had
he been raised side By side With that gentle.
man, and felt bound TO him bF every tie OF
old frisnash p. old c5m partnership and high
personal gard. Bat i Is SAID his neninee
made Fillmore speech aaf,ag the last
eampsign. lie denies having IA the speech
he made at LFoas, either "a 1gszed Fill
more. spoken tisespecttuilg d the RePue-
Lesa party, Or said anything 4eroga'ory OF
Mr. Frenon;. he is not eh4f sea with hag-
ing made any other speech dlr K the cam
Saign. 1.-The had been the violent friend OF
Fillmore. the enthusiastic kgJ- Nossin9
SAich his opponents chargr b a, IS Il pas
sble be would have made oaiy one speech
daring the whole Of that s1c citing campaign!
Does NOT this fact 60 to prove that ne was
then ~ be lie nov, Republican! The
question now is or should be S.ih RePa5h-
cans, presuRing both candidates are equal
~ competent. what does party duty sao
real party interests command them to Do
70 vote for an out aud out buchanan mac
Sho preiends to be sn inde vel aens cSadi-
date, and the candidate o. The members 81
the Bar yel who was dominated By Clique
OF eleven Democratic iasgers, presanlns
10 &C; for the eighty odd lawyers Of the Dis
trict, and who is opposed L. every principle
oftbe Republican Party-oF fer man .ho
10 iacispatsbIy a siauncb Republican, and
against whom The oniy polliea. delinquency
charged is, that during last campaign a
made a FILLMORE speech! fas Republican
party. We beg leave to say, Is TOO young yei
10 Justify Us in being very suset Ia siudyng
out the political sItecsdsals 81 members
We have not to q very far ssek to recog
n,ze NJ good Old Line Democrats many &.
our most prominent Repa0 .5-aEs Not &
lev men now 10 our ranks. we're Fillmore
men when he WAS nominated, aud even w.
teA for Fillmore without any such personal
fr,enGship motives as Our candidate had.
The Republican party il open TO ali who
zee she errors on their ways, and step into
its ranks TO do good yeoman service. Sc
far u this Dlstric, Juegesh Is concerned
the ehoice lies simply between Repu5h-
can and Pierce-Boehsnsn Democrat. NJ
one disputes that Mr.. Mi liz is Republican,
No one doubts the politics Of Mr., Mitchell
Our friends are at Psrfecs liberty TO do e.
thev please There 10 NJ whipping into
aAS traces in this party as 10 The Demo.
esa,ic party Republicans are Jrssmen,
They dare think and act a. ireemen, both
in reference to men and measures. They
vii do 90 in this case. But we should ike
20 zee the Republican parry improve by the
experience Of The old Wing party. The We
y ruination of that party We, that its mem
sers could rarely Oh important occasions
Leeoms united. Each man allowed himself
70 te governed toe much By lie own insisi-
deal preferences and prejud ZEE, losing signt
Of the true interests Of his party The nomi-
nee had 10 ssit In every respect or else
here were droses OF boltsrs. When united,
thsy y ere inv incible. LIE us consider the
Republican party and iss b. D objects. above
our own personal difsreA1 about men
and let US recoliect, ths' ne Republican
Who directly or indirectly nas aid to the
90 called Democratic part! Is thus far as
sistipg the most viasiclye isnseruPvlcu-
enemy OF the Republican rty.
w.