Anti-slavery bugle. [volume] (New-Lisbon, Ohio) 1845-1861, 1857-12-05
From the Cincinnati Gazette.
ALLEGED CONTEMPT AND Pr OFESSI0N.
AL MISCONDUCT IN A SLAVE TRIAL.
BEFORE JUDGE puRoorSk or TUE pRopA1

NV HN'No w Ohi "a VI - ~ NOhNNfN n OoN
cut ~ Attorney Of Hamilton County, Ohio, VS..
Jacob j. Dennis, Attorney Mt Law.
u-...
4. go. SYM '' e 'P'
Inc specihcations hled IN this case BY me prose
cuung Attorney L. a.. Conner, unuet the d'fec'
non OF ms Court. cAarges 'he fesponuent' oucop
D. Dcnnis' with wlIliui misconduct as an a''orney
anu counseiior NJ ia" OF ms Court WINS aouug
AS s"ch IN the "a uay OF November loo'''" u GER
.a'n cause tpen penang anu Whic" came u" " "
I1a,sanIn IN tn's Oour'' 20 WIZ! VIII iaoea
oorPus u,ec'ee 10 'ne oneiln y QUIZ sa'u eVTu's,
oohneuu'"s ~" W o'"S oe'oi9 Wv o"u 80
nv poIsVwe ,ne'e'" nhWeu' u w un.nens I've ~
turrn'ou ''no' " "s"ol W n"". "u.' ~
he,u possess'9h " Tue persons ueso'loeu III sa'u
VIII.
Inc powers OF TINS Court TO inhict summary pun,
isn'neht upon 's "mcers i"r wlliiuI misconduct anu
contempt VIII couo'iess not DC uehieu' me 'str
."ony " 'ns case Is ~ u"cunen,'ry' ""u euo' az
M"l'n'n .ne kho",eoBe" 'ue Cour'' anu uPou
iuii examination Oh respondents answer 10 tne
speo'nIa'ons, We " III q" ""'e'in W u
o"so "i'n"'eu' uut many "'erh'ents ~ v ""'o'e
Nnicu '"nsp'rcu u az presence or me oouI' y
ei'oue."s' d . "' " ,"e .He "uJ'ur""e"' ""'
srsueeu y" reSpo"ue"V i"ot'on 'hu ,"o "Prnm".
= , " Iu"lut.n " a G n y, ~ VI - o
a uiSlnotly Ss'eu W 'ns o"ut. in's u u", ~
an as sucd w"1'u u couIu uo ~ ~
prouuouou !" O"u!'o VI u pele"nS az " -"
saves, ou' "'t ~ u""o :, ~ n - W. "
Aegisa'nte pnsseo !" iooo' .no .ou't Mou'a "e"
sp"o'n' " l, hSRle'''" Gus y" VI 'e po'oon'
named IN tne haneas eorpns writ, when appo,nt'
me"' y Nuu'. oe Nv upV" ~, : asIoa ~
'io" " u '"e ""'0h ieSp""u'"' N w
cause auJournsa responuens "lso eIrs m s'atnS
Tue persons . nave oec" nn CUSTODY y u u :.
IN ivr upoh u return vi u VI" ', naooH ~
pus W "a 'ueer ~ o"s'ouS va ~" w,
Nou,'' " Was "o' ,r""s;orleu oy Ne aPPu,"'
Oh Mt. hs1'eStoh; ou' us vus'ouy ""o ~ O"'to
uyoi u eou,'' ""cn '"o' ~ le'po"uenV oue"'
not 10 nave oeen ignorant Oh NJ 'he tiue u Tue
procurement OF a second writ OF haoeas corpus re-
turnable before Hon. Judge carter Respondent
states that he requested the Court to require oil
Mr.. hggiestOn as custodian a oohd OF indemnity
Tor the beneht OF the master IN a SUN equai 70 the
'aiue Vi the persons cihimeu 10 oe siaVes. 10 "hich
IN ae.popu .na. II S'na,'n :" .n, i
ever since Inc formation of our constitution sntire
~ neglected 10 recognize the right Oh properly ID
human beings. ana hence a GUARDIAN oohu OF any
other bond concitloned as Is asked LOT oy respond
ent taken by TINS Court wou,a nave Deen without
precedent, ana uhaulhoriaeu oy law hesponoen'
states that al Ills law once various propositions
were discussed touching the legai rights OF his Gil
ents' ana tnat then ana mere oeIerlhiheG . aPp'y
70 one oil the Jadges OF the courts OF Ooulmoh
Pleas tor the iiowance OF anotner writ OIL haoeas
Corpus'W "p'ch sVt'eu"e"t !. i.sPouuen' "0 $3.50
inquire what legal rights OF MS cNeht cou,u ho'
have been here dOtornlned; and whether hereln
respondent does not aduilt ms deliberate intent 10
nave Deen - treat the Jurl'utctou U, tnis oouii
with contempt. hesponuene iurtner ueIenus anu
pleads tho practice oil inns Court in naoeas corpus
cases whieh cannot a.ali nun s'nee !: 80
Whoiy mfsrepreseh's 'he pracUce OF this Cot'"-
respondent errs as 10 tue conversation pe'"een
Inc court ana MS non 0udHe carter -.
we 1reo Z TUG oPiu'ou lha' you were Slll.y : "
Goh'emp' Vi tni cool' III u loiio"ins p"f'lou"le
A'' !" NV p,o0"S
eorpuS ca0e " u purpose vi er"pi'"s STe "
P.ep",u ""u ne "o "ns" Vi youi ~
Mr' "'thets' ia"a :, ue leieoo"o ~
m 'he VIM wy ""0E.c ~ anna w "
ns saves, Mu'h "a sdua,
Un - ~ aFo,, . rnnr eli;
80 sn". nnd Ala :, ,he ' ba,r -
~ e yua froa.msd -
"uicn you n Wv :. ~ = sno' s.
Tus J" $500. IS 49, mr;,
~ pio.a' IL. - w o.
" wi. y u -
snereoy ia?.as ~ uou ~ i" 90 - w." -
Vi 49, A..
tue procutemens y sun - nIn, .na. u uiio
ui0'op n, .n'? H.,
IuSe' ~ 80 ;nr;sI'n,;oa omo,
ma u 80, n,a,,or - , ,ha sann ,;ma r.
ao ea~p $50 nna ,hat onon r. ,ha ;,r; -
cases VI naoe"oe o'pu1, -. ~ =.
9'cuon Mere oo"I .n,a;n !, ~ ,ho en,ira ~
Jursu'"on 80. c., H,;l ;s 80 - ~
-
efc,Seo anu uetera'"eu. A.
~ - H., ohn ~ -
S"s ;,d;o;aI nnnso"a T..
hione e"u y S"e.
Prosei'e'I' PU ~ ,s;1d;r,o .;,h W. 80
ny ano."I' ~ - ~ uo w, hatara pdd
y o. u suuy?e. IS 49, as';nn u' 49,. and
Tug u ~ d, 20 , un, h ;"nisd;a,i,n =" :"
~ nv Wv n" r,La ana mi.
!" o"'Hp ~. -
aic''oh o. .he eouit W 81 ~ 49, W.
Is ooahu u sint'0".o ."e ne"I t"ro Jaw" ,aJ
We rehecl upon n E'e"t "lons oo.e OF;
anu tue insult onereu " .ne o'e'e'sno.a'e u u
py tranpah9 INTO ,he uus' ner const.uuoh anu
a~s, VIC . : !. " uu.5 ,od hn u
rage IN sucn manner as Is PROVIDED oy law,
haas cornus case as here nret en,ed. were onestion,
- uh;nh ,ha nsonIe of Otio have a door ;nterost
and it would have been eminently proper that thos,
questions involving personal liberty should hay,
our e,.1sns are Ges'rons o., knIwh hg wne'ner I'd