New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-12-24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DEC. S-Befr
Indaa RErrs

DECISION IN ApsIRALTr-PRAcTIcE-FoR At
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -cosTEsPr.
Frederick Swift ct a. sss IIs T Wsddy.
This wss q motion fof 40 attachment against the
.Ihee. To. SC ion "a. T. recover for supplies fur
ot respondent with clsuse Of foreign a.s hm.ni
ssn', bis good. aid eh.. and r w.1. o. sooi. ,OS ce
Lord The libel fsa juy u.s. ISL aud order 'nte'rd
PIsi s.. bsod bis isarn sseoa "a. s
Defendant not fJund-oo goods sc have alta, he'd tas
Ter, samuel q Lord A Qaerrsu, ssrni.nee. copy Of
" within process. 5; their ofcs, No 6 Wal street"
ee Or Sep. l. the Hbe.a. proctor obtained an port.
the dta1lt e the gHnshe aud that they
.tswer on oath te s.oe, to be propouadd end t-s
10 The amount Of sng NE d-e 1dsut in ,ner
their control The inteuosssoe. hed %
5. p, sud III. 70 and lSth OF toe g,rnshes made
sdsy ,ha, no service q the attachment u.d been sie
them. The i,elans proctor tnereupOn obtained on sep ~
an order taa the Msh. have leave smeod hs return and
then ohsued on TO- this order porte .ha, the gatnn
show why they should not be sdussed dsa t and
BITTs The application ,is to .he CoaI is TO h,vs
the sani'hers judged in contempt r no. having '
e.pect to the zsDhm.nt In puted 10 hen raey avsrred
their ~fngpe. 70 give evoence yin es'e' IN TIE Gaze out
deted the rat Of b-ants 70 examine In that man af
in be character Of psrtiea
The papers brought before the COst show the OreceednE IN
the have been eKoeediDs oo.e and Inc ard
that no ssl foundstioa has been sd for p'es The gar
hit thew b.1e S Ut coSSto,e With the
BY the HbelAIts proceedings. There s 30 evidence
s 70: i the h h.d the
acton instituted and the hbesnt' without proof TO that
TO come Ito th. litigation. (Ds Court Rules q ~ 30
Bl.t oh How r, So, Abbotts Ad r. SIS $50 The libel
does rot sse st esrnhes hold property Of the respond
eni nor does specify the particular credits and effects
the debtor to Be arrested in their hscds nor does tne return
Cf the Msb thereon menon that property va, ,tacned
him IRE beisuts procured order Of Court sunofzrs
tie M,t amend bis return No amendment OF !. .eosn
An ob.cure interinestion 10 thu rrtrrn was sugze"
on mi. molten amendment That however csnnot
he u piled TO suob for the return pupos 20 have been
made July order nd rot obts ned nnt
Sept H. There Other pp1be irregularities caused
~ the place orders taken uoon the min
IN the progress Of the proceedings Those or 's are rare
~ judicial scs Of the Court bat ener- at the tnsapce OF
ks paty seeking them and when not the result Of formal
motion 70 the Court with due notice 10 the opposite party they
re the perl e the party moving them botn to regularity
and effect q Abbott. Ad. X. SIS. SIS
looking Lbezbt ptoceedinrs thus appssrs tnst
in brr action sgsns the respondest ~ assume na
other p,rsors hold Pey Of his. and mpetfs warrant Of
arrest sgans popert bat they have issued genersy
without desbtDg what credits ef-c u Is tn affect ana
tten the Msrsb that be lett copy OF the wit
the oce d the sought 70 - CHARGED aud hsfe
upon the beauts Stepping OF the Of the SUIT en-
To IersoDs bcSe witnesses in th
ana dem.d tbat they k attached for contempt Of Couf'
IN a'pg 10 comply Nth that d.msnt 80
fhr throughout Ifegnar and ths application
mus. h. oen'eo with co.ts.
For Ibesnts Mr. yssdset For gArnlshers Nj Huntiey.