The Davenport daily gazette. [volume] (Davenport, Iowa) 1856-1869, 1857-10-21

~F-F Il LOWRY CHI
1he nemserM MlgAsly Asddled.
Tie D..-av,.j III Yesterday J. exceedingly
sronblea ~ ,l, activity 1T ono II the edi-
AIRS os III. ,,.,s.r IN i,at'ling fer the kerab-
6rss PARTY. an. u t. vesation sa,s "he
n,tcr. murc frl.,t.ysi, about political mat
ters ~ general. ami ti,, Democratic party
in catticular, than an, other individual in
scott .naniv." III ~ach charges a. this
are ,Ncecdiall, absurd. especial, a rnna-
nttns ffom the D,.apetr. The truth J.,
our ue,shbor, arr exceedingly -or ou the
.nb,rel oi the Int, unhappy overthrow 81
them par,, III TIL, Comfy, ant u seems
liz, ar.. dcicllu,d tn bod IL in'i' idualls
q, e,tits..ally responsible for tn "y.r~ hcl.
m,n.. d,lea; Of ~ immaculate Democracy
We 10 .laa'd taa aul shar. nf hi, gc-pon-
.,nltt l,c Gd.5't, @,J is seft, aud its
co,,r.e Is. received the eenet.''i, and most
emphatic approval d lis own part. Tan
tile D.syssdi say the same, 81 does the "a
III. &c tie election prove that the Dsaaefa,
had influence Whatsoever, unless {. ih-
,als ~ party There was ~ Necessity for
die Ga.sl.. t. resar, To- false hoods. lie
IA va more convenient and ia itself
NJ 10 powerful in assisting our Objects, than
an, ial4ehools We might have concocted.
When ialssheods ami deception become
osce.sary 10 sussa.n the Republican cause,
we hall cease g. be It's advocates.
But the D.aoefg. charge ls with IaIse-
uooi in .,atin- thar Il claimed the election
0. Parrot, IN kansas a. a Democratic vic
tory--yer Ia shis ver, article 10 makes snch
statements q. must conyinc. any Reader
t4al watcher il cta,ms the election of Par
ro,t a-s Democratic victory or not. il j. de-
airous IL impres,ins upon the public the
slt,f that n Is Democratic victory. 1,
.sys losgs pni,ea III the Democratic party
voted ior Parott. Weaeny this, and W. lie
~ that fifty National Democrats" IN Kan
,,s voted Tor parott. Every supporter Ia
hausas 81 the present Democratic Admin
.iration voted against Parrott lie was
Tie candidate II the Free State men. and
opposed To the I.olie, of the Administration
N Kansas, while his opponent was Ma
tia,al Democrat the pro-slaycry candidate,
!. tool u the Administration, and received
not culy the united support Of the Nation
Al Democrat d the territory, hut even Of
those Border Ruiiian. from Missouri who
could get chance TO vote. The Missouri
RP.llieaa la announcing the return. from
Kansas says: II il conceded that parrott
Il 'ci Rsp"Liio,aD i, elected Delegate Ia
Congress, &c."
The fws'iitio,afisi, me of the most rabid
administration organs In Kansas, in reply
ing 10 the charge that PARROT had once
been Democra,, says" A. well for the
skunk 10 claim q" hc n lion, A. Parrot, claim
70 hc a Democrat. The fact i, hc i Just
such Democrat as Jim Lane. lie is wha,
the Democracy in kan.as call an aJoii,ioaisi
But the Dtaocrat says "Parrott il a South
''arclinian BY BIRTH he wa, and i. AN
advocate Of the Nebraska BILL" and that
. lac has been a loud mouthed supporter Of
Judge Douglas, and will doubtless be- the
anne hereafter Without stopping to ask
whether il Is possible the Dtaocrci Jtlieres
all this its statements on this score are SUI
iicient H. convince an, reader, that il il
endeavoring to make Democratic victory,
lust ~ We said, out of PARROTS election,
especially when in the same paragraph IL
cays PARROTS opponent was irccsuler in
isis. leo was the whole Democratic party },
and that the Democracy had no, full eonfi-
dence m his views III kanss. policy. &c.
We are glad, however, that even against it,
own actual po<ition, the . goc,at denies
elaiusing thu result OF the Kansas election
q. a Democratic victory. Let il be r.col-
lected, that the D.m0e,si charges u with
ia!'ehood Cor saying IL claimed the election
VI Parrott ~ Democratic victory. II thus
acknowledges, what IN the article Of last
Monday VIC attempted 10 prove, that the
election u Parrott, the Free State candi-
date In kansas, Is 40 Democratic victory.
IT, dilemma on this subject Il evidently
= sssss horned beast. Two horns are not
enough. IL first came OUT and attempted
70 prove tbs election Of PARROT a Demo
cratic vietcry--it then denied that i, had
claimed this a such a yictory--then il gives
leasonA which II true, would make IL
Democratic victory lit Charge u with
ialsehood in stating it, true position a. gath
cred fom its ressoning-then yroess We
were right, II we acknowledge its state
laenu ars truthful--and finally closes with
giving "rsssonr" Why the Gazette has mo-
,ires tor its denying that the election Of
Parott u Democratic victory wcl.aye
the De~ocraf in the incxtrcahe confession II
has placed itself--but trust that n the
sscolloctioa Of the recent defeat III it, party
ia this county, In this State and ia Kansas,
grows dim, u will r~ovcr IT, good h,imor,
and lie disp~ed 10 treat is ne,gbbor- With
little more gensiemanly courtesy