The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1857-03-17
Domestic Troubles Among the Wealthy.
SUPREME CoURT-sPECIAL TERM.
Before Hon. Judge Roosevelt,


HABIAs coHPrs-ouARREL FOR THE CUSTODY A CHILD
NAsm 1o-In he Matter Of the Petition Of Sarah II
Pau.dir9 for e Ctody Of her Infant Sen Tho parties
In this suit In highly respectable position In society,
Mr.. Pauldpg 10 the Of ex.Aayor PauldinE and his
wife, TO whom he was married in February 1881, is
daughter Of Borandates Nauran MERCHANT Of this city
The present In one Of those too which
crowd the calendars OF courts from various
but In this instance appears that the difficulty arises
from ncompatibiy Of temper, and mot from orminsi,y
Philip r. Panldns he respondent resdes al burg,
Westoheser county and by his marriage has two ohi
oren-Grsce n Psuldipg born 1854 and tho other, VIII
left her husband In May, 1860 In consequences Of his
alleged unkndness, taking with her her two children
Ms,ssehussss, with IN Invalid sister During the time
residence In this city Mr. PAuldpg paid very few
yi.s to The children On Mrs. P:ndlns: return Urn S
husbands brother and paid visit 10 his family at his
country residence, near Doobs, ferry 10 wos'cne,!er
such visit and when out for drive Mr. Pauiding. II
alleged TO bis broshers residence and took away
rary charge OF her, and took her TO tavern Ia the
age Of Tarrytovn where he continued 10 reside with
ss up The syssy 20
believe that the respondent would return the petitioner
visited the child at rsrryso~n and permitted to SEQ
n In the month OF February last Mr. Pauldipg came 10
this city with little Grace and nurse, taking his
tbsNew York Hotel the petitioner that
child Il me New York Hotel e also alleges that Philip
r. Pauldng person Of large wealth. and that the
peciaons Of his children from his must DO very
co siderabe that he does provide for the pc
tioper her youngest cbd and In her opinion the G-l
Grace should be oonndod TO her care.
Upon this petition wris OF habeas corpus granted.
The child fine looking little creaurc, brou sht into
court when quostou OF jurisdiction argued by
M Noyes for the petitioner Tho Judge decided that
this Court had Jurisdiction and pom ting the examination
Into The merits OF the he directed Mr. Berthol 10
place be child In the mothers until the question
nnay disposed Of the father having liberty 70 visit the
child once every week (ou Tuesday) st ths house Of
Professor walcst Gibbs, II Lexington avenue
Mr.. Psuiding. In his sndavt says that the I7th OF
April last Sarah r. PAuldipg cft his homo Tarrytown,
in wssct ester county oreusbly TO make visit among
her relations and friends IN the city OF New York. thai
up 10 the time OF her departure she had init
tnat time for weeks subsequent 70 her leaving
suspect her intention separate herself from him;
that he at any time guilty Of any cruel treat
msnt towards bis wife, nor bad she any just or reason
able grounds for leaving her home that amer she len he
made efforts indooe her return TO her home;
that be ready xious account OF his chi.
the said Sarah should rhs rcspou.
dent scmits THAI be resides II botel In rarrytown,
but thai he 70 the owner OF large and valuable country
sea. two miles cstant from farrytown where he resided
with his family up to The lat OF April 1885, whom be
Induced TO leave end give no kse sing house aud 10
70 tho hotel 10 board q the earnest and rcapeted
solicitations Of his wife, who than year pre-.
vious bad been urging him thus change thcir mode Of
living; that the bote 10 large and commodous place,
and 10 mainly nled with boarders and families OF The
he case vas set dovs for yesterday (uonday) but
was adjourned again 10 Monday the 2sd met