New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-03-10

20 the mater. Noz CO. y more ,'.... 90
this 7 Suppose slave -cape from Ienl,oy VIZ '
Slsytrv ~ moi nu,horz-i 6y law can he Oe re-
claimed t.o s,i5 that
In this csse sua ioi', Of the 'urt hsve 'ln 'nN
slave may be taken BY b master m, ~, s,y o,,
the Tni.d , ates To -abe ~ uo'7e ~ y va
- g .,,'o,,v |, - rue ibs "a. s1i1 ~ me
Court, sr al-o macy o'he' toipg7 80. 7'p y, u
sutls iity. No'hDg no id- "-e" a. - = a.,
tss 70, \ direct b,sfiuE o. itt Jpl' h'"'h o, tls
-. -, = btcb tie, oo,i Eel. c1n ~ 'n-i1@f"d
D. ap,t,r,fy Jsh,ll ctftaiI ~ NJ regard ~ ~ sV1'
The an. .o. 81 ilr soi t"l BE- - before re- ''ir so
decd.c D., tam tuthlr lively. on no utds beyond
TIKI, d,s be,d ,heh cheiy re'y on - q ieoi,r'
III >utfepe G ur- "t Tao SJufIet0 t.es All
esrecI. u the Sih'e " VI -''u.i
In 70 Jet ssd 20 N-'l'o- IT zoe Oh A't,'ie "t
re {, l-u ion ri fl tos u /. d ola-e1 frp' l---
Sisvery mr. uvou1t ~ -@ryI'O1a sn4i r"letf" - De
in'roouc,d 20 tbs ae O'hersi.e Il IA tr trs on
irbnent OF crimes "ht c'i tn par sn.' nave of-9
duly co vici.d, and re ID S-c'i}n j. Is declared
flat soy vios'iOn Of ri. Article shsl effect tn
emsr cipa g suc1 pei. % on hs Obls 4'n - 'ef
wee. In Illinois n oi TIA En- throu1h ne S;11 -
civ ~, meter viii - slaves Ih'- Il insU@f
vh'cb ~ suppose tel,n-s txcla-iyely % tie safe
TIE Supome CtWt 4 I,Os 10 tue case "a 11ii'1
VI Ja.ru+ Gi.uer I -.Ic' ts
Ate, ue eorqles, Of t4, Terri, ~ By NRn'' ~" -
II The Tufed s'es sud yIsitc nai que - ~ 800,
ssous fign. and lberi, ~ 10 .enrn .'rf' 'u"l 80 -
Trte.d 20 them hi. h- ooutenced secnfel 1rn ~
"a. r..e.r Of mos. reg c. nn toey hra b-i'
ths' time. and thai nef'-r n2f~ss toI d ,5 % ,ai
power deprive them q" o. o 10 o.n H. ,s,ed and o,5s,
narce and Consultation should not be 50 ] oi t,
lie,
taI,Ws I'm ofy. nor r. ss'e Of Illinois otherFse
he D isha,if cis B. u was ND tns tn 's
Isns 40 not be thu. pr ctea bur must yield TO the ord
AI re- a. la.. ,d ~ the Sapo NJ Court Of
Mi.soort r NAMED ~ go ksp0rts VA Wlnny ".
Whj'esdes, Missouri L 90, i'3 at Oc'obeG Term,
1924 l. sype4r'd ha' 90 nc than twenty I'VE yeaf3
before the d, leDdant. str u'r hnsDsld bad removed
fr,p Csrolns 10 Illinois. I'D brought with them
the sniff IL they continued t. reside 10 ll'ln)l-
three or fdS yrs Itt4'ung tn plant Fl ~ slave,
after which they remove 70 Mrsour taking her @itl
them.
The G. VI, held hat u .l,ve be detained ia Illinois
III II he be entitled 10 e.oou, ft- right of t0e owner
does L OF revive when be hncs the negro n save
State
That when slave is taken 20 Illinois By his sner,
who takes up his res1 there the slave IS entitled
to freedom
In the csse of Lagrange vs. Ch1uteau . Mi,solri
Rep, 20, at Mag term 1873. 1t Wa decided in4 the
Ordins1 &C of 1871 VA i'eaa-d ia ldamsuta l4H
for these who may choose live under ~ rather than
as pCnai ststutc.
That any sort of resiaopce con'riy~d o. permit ed
BY the lepal owner g. TIE upon the farm OF scret
trusts OF contracts in ord-r 10 oee4 or ev4de the Ord
nance AID thereby inrndnre Slavery dc t@c0, w)u'd
ent lie sLcn slave - tcedom
In Julis VS. Mex inney. Missouri Rep 30, It was
held where Il slave VS. settled IN tn, STATE OF Hi
Iois bot with iotenJu o1 the pat OF me owner 10
be removed 1t some future de} Ms! hl'i0g sad tave
10 person 10 labor ,r orc "r two days aid rsceVl'g
The psy or the hire tie 81 is entitled - her freedom
pti u'icu IuLOls.
Racine VI. Waxer q Missouri Rep $780, June Term,
1886 IL Ga nVOlVIDg, 10 every puicu ~ me p'd-
cpes e ,fe csse bef Rachel sued for her free
dom nr,c j. aoueared hat abe had been bought "a
slave m asoun by Stockton, an officer Of the Army,
taken to Font Smelling where he was staI'ue1 snd
she vas retained there az slave year, am t1en
s cc, Ton removed TO Pf7re du Cht-n, taking kachel
with him a. a slave whore no c Intinuet 10 n'l1 her
three yssrs and then he 'oOk her TO the state OF Ms
souri ana sod her Dc asiave
Fort Smelling admitted 20 be on the west side OF the
Mississippi River and north Of toe ste OF M',9an IN ae
territory the Uuied State rhs' Prairie dn Cnirn wac ~
River Walker tho ccferdar. ned Rachel under Stoeton
The Court eaid in his caso:
THE officer lived in MouI Territory at the time be bought
the slave ne seui 10 holding any aGG Pfoeura @
This his voluntary oct dom "ihou' any "ng is'ln '
sl W b% r., w.s"1 1itory .ad Mchiiaa contrary to
sud ground Rachel declared to be entitled 10
freedom"
In snfwer to the argument that as an officer of the
army tho master hal night to take MS slave lh'o Tree
Territory, The Court sad, 20 authority OF lag or TIE
GOvoIUs eat compelled hin 10 keep the plnnil there
ar elaNe.
slaves IN Nguis when ol and soldier h. re
or Terri,ores he hereby hs- shr with him
slaves a. N suit bis interest. convenience l. sHey
be If ths be true the Court say then it also IRA
Iep. as as 20 him Others who have the character ia
Ofdrsuoc a. d the AT Of 1927 admitting Missouri INTO Ia
tutions # uop..iavt hodiu. State''
H. Wilson vs.. Melvin a Missouri Il jg!l appeared
tbe def left Ter eee with an .ut1n of resil
ing in Illinois taking h4 negroes with him. Alter
moths stay in Illinois, ne took his negroes to ST.
and hire them then returned llnor Ga thee facts
the interior Court instruct the Jury that the defendant
was sooarner In Illinois THIS the Sapreme Court
held was error and the judgment was reversed.
The csse of bred Scott rs. Emers)s 10 Miasoirl
Rep. GS1 March Tenn, 1872 will new be stated
This case uvolved the identical question before US,
Emerson having since the hearing, sold the plaintiff to
SaI ford the defendant .
Two Of the Judges ruled the clse the ChielJdstice
dssei ting. Ii cannot be improper 20 state tue GROUNDS
Of the opinion of the Court aud of the dissent.
The Court say "Cases of this kiad not strangers
in our Court. Pom ons have been frequently here al.
Judged 10 lie emit LED 10 their freedom on the ground
that their masters held them in slavery Ia Territories
or States ia which that institution is prohibited From
the rft decided In Courts II might be inferred
that this resut was brought about by presumed as
stnt of the aster from the fact OF having voluntarily
taken bis saye t. place where the relation OF mister
and slave cid net exist. Bat subsequent cases base
the right to exact the forfeiture OF emancipation, as
they term il the ground, i. would seem, that II was
the duty e the Courts OF this State To carry into effect
the Constitution snd laws of otaer States and Terrific
res rega de- OF The rights the pohy or the insttu'
ioDe OF the peCl le of this ate.
And the Court say that the 81 ses Of the Union, in
their municipal concerns, are regarded as oregn TO
each other that the Courts OF one State do not take
notice of tie laws of other States unless proved as
faos and that every State has the night to deter nine
low far It's comfy other a'es shall extend aui
lie aid down that when theirs il no set OF msnumsslon
decrced In the Free s ate, the Courts OF the Slave
State cannot be called 10 give effect to the law OF tue
Free State Comfy, it alleges between States, de-
ponds ppon the discretion OF bo'h, which may be va
riod by circumstances Aud il is declared by the
Court that times are not they wnen the former
decisions on this subject we're made SIEGE theh nol
onlv ais but Stss have been possessed with
dark and fell spirit in relation to Slavery, whose graft
Acaton /. sought in the pursuit of measures whose IN
eyitablo consequence must be the overnro* ana
destruction of our Government UOder such clrcum-
xtsnces IL does not behove the State OF Missouri -