New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1857-03-21
la " LNTE'LLIGEN

sUPREME CoUT-GEsEs.L TEsM-Mseh Do - Before
Judges sITcHsLL RoO,EvEL' and DAVIS.
THE ACCAssoK' TRANSIT CONPANI-fHE PRINCIPLES
oN WHICH ARECEIyLR SHOULD ~ APPOINTED
VIM fatteU' at sat re Accr''9tJ ffAn". ''"P'lI' u
R0OSyyYIr -T'e I, der BEARD from ire ed,
,uoIs thtr ,hr thst Edw ard 'wes "a Couas~Ir s.
SL~~ upou FIJI uuder.kDs IL the usual form n ne sun
o sPft viii approved -gfe''- be ,poou'-d Hrce yer"
.ich to receive a"d take e''>" 81 the tuf 'ten
West DaGie W'1'er sad Pomed'd' anf nod he -'ne
,ut.t the luther orde TIL. Court sud thA' the p,r's
TO BE .coD h,'is pe.''io9 ii Tue Vessels 90 DE-
mi, o,dc MADE, not hu. aud full hesnnt OF The
c.u,e but Btflocutoy motion founded merly wnt
AZ DAVIS rPer' us-d tor t'a pu'po'- Aud yet At
only 'itct the owners anc mortgages on matng
AZ use or port Of the v,ssl. Tor the consequences o."
~b,t had been on The ordinary oJunct'u ~ PNnth'
would been compelled ass ndion' % s9e ample 8,
With .cuny ,Icrp r It's se custody, aud Ei.a 40 aver
beidts AID sb n sugs soL, even of insolvency OF
other .hoild the shps ntinue ss they we're
Tb, ~hois clam Of Painth On which To- possession sad
u fou cosy -smhies Of the value probably u more
ihsps ~io" hs thus 'unua ny been dip sea o. .hd $40
J,c-d drbi'. bill OF eIPru.e ICES to,n t4lV
c.mn,1ced 80 By attachment aEau't the Company "a
ior-sr eorpoi.uD In. aShmelt wnen served gave the
he COMPANY bad the tue Ia the on toe
~ 6 II 6s .5yiia Ouf IN fhr u.s Pr
,u-tlus t~o PAralei proceedings 10 the same
A. u,ihc,Ib This ming v,I.i,us double sl, they
.Ae sI'.in .ssuehi. ia their seoud compliant 'aAds
bit hey say through Morgan and Hoy Trustees holds
or,s.s. On tvo u the steamers bogds pa, due
;h amount Of ss &C., AID .uohe d,c'y 70 himself on tue
four advances claimed by him & a1ou 4 TO SOW
era. huadrto tho collars. more which they do rot
e,uy but simply that they can form no opnl'n
any reliable d,huite utomsou relstive TO the
snuuut II such sdysnce, Or validity of '.d lien rois
certainly pleading. is imPeacs Iebt OF tae lea or l'
Th- plaintiff, suorsnse. ~ber. 10 effort Las oeea
u sde 10 obtsn kso~iedse is no around Of action
IL 'urh-r srseo that seyers creditors OF the Company
tvs recovered judgments their demands have issued exc
cUops r,quir Sher the interest Of the Company
the thai the sops they cou b. sold free OF oInd
ncuur.nc- would oint much more than enough 70 as
i CL them, iuClucn
neD hut 'hat 'eolid the nt.es OF the Con ANY 'Ss
Northern Light Star Of the West be sold - htendrd
the Sheriff with n. Liens them isH oPetenced
d-tn' land Unknown Keep; 70 The defendant aoeLo.
AID the IrAI,li Company the WILL NOT produce moro
4 al . pCu1nal AnouIt
On th -nent made b., the plaintiffs themselves without
rItac- to he sc' essb.n-d By the defense wa. pre-
Of claim is there for dposens Vanderbilt and the tfu't
mo,isee' Of their security tot the nndrpaIsi bonds III
queni dsi- for e2I The bonds viii Be rem-m,
tered morss- bonds they Issued and ues ts.a
the hoth-rt Lsht and they became dg ana psy,oe Is
the e si', '.d the morts.Ee OF curse h
on the sa OF Marco 1855 nearly 'n mouths oeoIe .ns
srtss .tsenurL," Possession ser tor-iiure CONSTITUTES
~ t,sei III. ti.nrnt of sch.;e morcs Enteo pree.e
eOIt,d Tor the tnr fAn OF ~nc; Tue cred
his AID without wncn he would hive
f-tsintd IN ~ Dc II bis nAad, 7 deSise nn oi ~
without lu 'a1e 70 impair the ooltstYh % $50 - ,sa
tfai-s sce.eil. be- Nd cOr'tiuaonA power 0t 'ae
Cunt - Vel a. II th- legislature; .,,
A. T. heott-' es.irn. u vanderbilt II 'Ppesrs ~ a. -
thst % the lrh Of June lso the Cmp.L hent -
lin IN he ru OF sOs7 ard requ1Ls sui turtle 'as.nes'
ave lin "a '-cG'i'y snoth-s uors-.e cossn.s I'll,
''tsn en- sAe WITH provi.iou II the lDs'rlnrhI -
rein bursed De 80 ulc the Pssr.si'h -
ss'neni CT 'hr ssid four Steamship WIG A-uo''I W
css- 81 0isuE Of ormsOc and ms ia ''tu
soc. .iipulrion u lmr eiis'-y 70 pos-s'lon AnS
20 D "a u vhen tbs proceeding was Ne'eo- " -. -
.llef-s tbn BIZ scysIIes secured ~ be So
20 fs1s osAc-s interest sni tnst BE- hJios
" huc, q the Company dur. and sraou ntbs Iue
sr'sste 20 lN 0f thus eIhbitinf N Srsy o.
cue 70 BIN y TIE Con p2Iy of nearly EAT ui'u ~
IL ihsn iPp.Gs, xitsoui sOus into f1f.n- - -
psI'ns oerup, DO better post!ar II reference y ~
&c Proc rteUs thU til, do in r-f.frner % ne Ene
'he -four AID tia. the Objection 70 rec-ivef'P
'irtc' frs Of ts o--ucshr' vested naat. .nG "a
psps tie otjzs,ioI. Of Dis contracts IL inc "ne
/. 'hr otb-r $500 49,,
N.esrhl,s -lvrncy no, d.pge5 Or a.. toity 20 re-
.pIo so,Ud plaintiff. IL result e-taoa tn-'r CLAIM
h.r- 10 qsssti Asd there were |. auy met 4"
terc-r Of ,seuTy doube the value ~ the snp' o. Pr
i,rrrc u 'ne PIE <sD 80 "a lod- ne ma Juiz
u'rt Ih.r- :, therefore orly DO AZ rEht p1.
~ ter Ssrsyy summary iater-r~re- VIE .ue
m, nv Ary n J nctous-t-c-iyr'stps - .teaU
uJuuetois d'ouetbrE str Isen' IN az -
-rh r esDn d, sld only IN es-s.o " 20 ins
Try Ibeir supposed too free Que OF tse
cestTuciicn of tie ll,e c. { Chaneer' sna "
- i.Ned all yrrsr.iy end IN q -ir o~n de.Raeu"H -
he order APPEALED rever-ec-iofn 81 ts'e''~ " Vt "
t!sc b ore ot NJ Juds.s
SPECIAL rr.s-B Before JgdE- DAVIS.
THE NILES CASE ARGgtD.
IL tke n after Of G-orE- W Nj ,.L
1fls -s@, winch IL vlli b. recoiece1, inVN'- .no
su,.uon % p-.sn'. rrtt prseues - "a svo1 %
hsrinr e urt, ur~r b. L.< b-~n '~oe-d 70 zoe -
and sub~.9uslty RESTORED BY fun Psraca 10 nis n.
csfis~I-As prueS srsp<aalA from prss1os ne ns
CoCr Sill baASrg axued to4nG ~ II wv