Kanawha Valley star. [volume] (Charleston, Va. [W. Va.]) 1856-1861, 1857-02-03
- NOTICE.
IAlliaferro, and others. 0unpaaasaass.
= NOTICE.

1alliaierro, and others, O0neptu1s0nts,
"a.
Patrick, and others, Defendants.
IN CHANCERY.
ITO Alexander G. Taliaferro and Agnes,
~ his wife. William Marshall. Mary N.
Afcher. Fielding L. Marshall, James F.
Jones and Ann L., his wife, John T..
smith and Margaret L., his wife, Thomas
Mafshall, Eliza Marshall. Robert L. Dou-
that and Mary A., his wife. Mildred p,
Marshall Jacqueline A. Marshall, Elliot
M Draxton and Ann NJ his wife, Ellen
MI arshalI, JacqueIine B. HOWE, Mary
Howie. Ellen HOWE. Anderson Wade and
Susan, his wife, w. NJ. HOWE. Ann How
ir. Jno. Marshall, A.sA. Marshall, Jas E.
Marshall, Fielding Douthat and Mary W.;
his wife. Jas. X. Marshall. Edw. G. Mar
shall, Jannet r. Harrison, Geo. D. Fisher,
Lucy NJ. Norton, Edw. G. Fisher, N. G.
Kenney>and Mary A., his, wife, Mary
Fisher, Raleigh Colsion, ANA +. Colston,
James G, Paxton. Jas. w. Massie, B. j.
Jordan, Samuel +. Jordan. George Fish
er surviving executor Of E. j. Canning:
ton, decd, George +. Harrison, Edward
J. Harrison, Carter II. Harrison and
Henry Harrison plaintiffs, and, Spicer
Patrick and Virgins his wife, Aaron
Stockton, William Tompkins, Joel Shrews-
bury, William Dickinson, Samuel Steele,
Robert e. Steele. John, Alexander, Sam
I~uel Alexander, Susan C. Thornton, Ann
N. Wilson, Barbara Wilson, Sally Will
son, Ann G. Marshall, --- Marshall,
Emily HOWE, Mary Fisher, Lucy G.
Fisher, Susan l., 'Colsten, William s.,
Wilson, Betty A. Fitzhugh. Mary A.
Harrison, Margaret L. Marshall Fanny
Marshall and John Marshall defendants
in the above Chancery suit: G%.j
| r. ! Tskc Notice, r. \
That at the Fall Term 1856, Of the Circuit
Court for Kanawha Co. and Safe Of Va,
q decree was rendered in the above cause,
ordering, among other things, a reference
OF said cause to John L. Mosely Esq, q
Special Commissioner for that purpose.
s,ppoinLed,, with Instructions to report up
on the title Of the land mentioned in the
Bill and sought TO be divided and rarti9
Toned in said cause, embracing the fol-
lowing enquiries, To wit:
mst.. Whether the claim Of title, to
John Steele nineteen thousand FIVE hum
>dred acre survey, is correctly stated in the
Bill ~ !. ,H~4 II.
2nd. Whether the several interests of
the present owners Of said tract of land
are correctly ascertained and set out I'm the
Bill. ~. .. ~.
Sd. What is the interest Of each own.
er in, the whole tract? q ..
.4th. What is the interest Of each own
er, to whom lot B, is assigned, in said
lot B. - - g.:
9Th. What is the interest of each own.
err, to whom lots c. and E. are assigned,
in said lots G, and Z, X
/ 9Th. And~that said Commissioner re-
port any such other and further matter
asto him may seem proper, or any Of the
| parties require, ",,1 ..z x T.
F And take. notice, that have fixed upon
Monday the 18Th day Of January 1857 as
the time, and the Office of Parks aud
| lioseiy m the town of Charleston County
of Kanawha and state of Virginia, as the
place, for complying with the foregoing
acquisitions Of said Decree, at which time
ana place any of the parties who think
proper may attend. y. 49,. =
JOHN L. MOSEhY, /,
2prT.io1 Toy,, ~; Sinnar