New-York daily tribune., 1856-02-29

ntf the Une States sSc.srt i-sef as tue pross
! ccfrr Gud the scsu,td o. aettudslts
hs sbeese1 that srsu ocote uuprsrsie ed IN dplo
rtey sd tsnse-ous dtaurc ron ts hitherto ,uraea
e,-ii d-c,ro iorsl teooursc whiob cosd
not M 70 d. erb the fesce ofatcn would ire yi,sL
tcs f%o e s ls s e Al '''' step III "
1Lo "a The example of 90 he much re-
saice ~" reiei 10 a. n''sace Of recent date Ia
o. @ srae impo'ta'e, bu o. sp'sr chsrse that
ocua e. GsiIns Toe which, IN the opinion
~, long sace be- Nse.iys hal.,er Mr. Crsnpon r.pre
ensd 10 tbs Government that the Msury Wss berg
iued in Tori of New ok pr,ate, t. deprests
uIn lc uerce Of tie Alis The evidence could be
ueffs Witch ins,ssed bare sos,-os 90 a. jIII % @ t9s
Il there could be which warrant the course sus
-estsd b. her Maesty Mste in respect tie complaint Of
states, would be that tie bark Maury but the President
uhcrt The slightest hesato delay proceedinss
should be found to be implicated. All alleged
'uspeon were Immediately gated and the result hich
conn uicsted 10 her Msjest,'s Oov, rrneut
d If this O. scqett acting gOn ,he rule row Presc ded in
that H Great Bratn the complaint ssainst the bark Msuy
charge lad named the perfos scoused with precise
stens9t Of their acts when and where done produced
the sTdeuce which be intended support allie
,,1iiy 70 de % nIg vonla b d 20 % , % b
tateu uu these preliminary matters should have been
hem vst her MsesT's Npis,efs ISbt have eI9sctei'
Woud have beon oeemed courteous or friendly to the BnsA
Lord arendon may Be well assured that such reply in u,
tho Msuy would have heen quite sstaeioy 20 her
Mscsiy. Government his reply 70 this Cove ~ re-
cruiin,ents within the United States
nii Ills GocrDr'nt ls apled by LORD .rendons dis
pa the 10th Of No'enb"r o the position sdVerted 70 in
complaint with reference 20 that proceeding
lie Of the con pst wcre uy disclosed the oen.s
clctry stated Of tho British officers named
with than usua precision Indicated sufficient information
mont has pass
which be made between this Government aud those oi
scIised ~ Lord Clarendous dispstch -,
controlling which reflection, viii readily
Lord Clarendon this Of dssng the case is
d,ei1ed. ,.,-.-
pforn ri beyond The limits ofhe United States those
who acted within those limits bat have since left the
country, nothing further remains 70 be done
his rsut eeeIy rereied the sense Of wrong which led
The consideration Of her Maesy Government violation OF
BefTe pe,eDt the Predents views in respect to other
British irtoneries who implicated apa who hold Of
de Io.iton here by the consent Of the EScqye il seems
yenber should be roTtculary noticed
In that dispatch Lord Clarendon has subjected 10 unfair
Insisting upon afcr the Proceedngs complained OF have
ceo,ed and he alleges by the Interpolation Of the British
Tie cumstarce, which led to the abandonment the
gsrded by ber Msjesy's which the
United States not sufficiently grateful II it be favor
e the uns earned on IS II was by British authority IN
the United States the exercise Of right The application
es her Msjesys Government to disconnue recruit
ng by liz officers because 1t national ofense.
This Government cannot receive the suspension OF
does Lord Caiendons reflection upon for not
receiving oil deserved As the proceeding. for reisns
recruits British service this country resulted from in
her MJey officers here and in the Br tsh Prov
uces by the Ministers Of the Crown for that
run o.e discontinue tben is regarded
justice but 10 satisfaction for past injury
i m Great Brsin that the men who euticed
trsr from the United States into the British Provaces
and enlisted in ber Maestys service should be ged
casual reading of Lord ClseLdons dispatch Of the 18Th OF
November may convey an impression nt t demand has been
Oocedsd but such is not its true import Ihe language oi
that disf atch is a. follow; -,
Legion " no have enlisted hired in violation of the
Upt,d sraes law, well as ' British law, her MaIe5,ys
(iovern prepared offer them their discharge"
he oder discharge them ri be show that they
or hired in violation Of the laws Of the Uuited States
That ud be OF avail unless shown they
sl,o enlisted hired IL violation of the British law.
United States for enlisted hired contrary
the Great Britain an'ecodent transaction within the
charged The SINGLE having been enlisted hired in
violation of the United states law would not be available under
NJ less the further fact be shown that the enlistment
was @ II violation Of tAc British Law.
OF Ge, oy them United States the Of
- ,iu,t IN the Brush Provinces would be- valid according 10
the Bri h a Under TIN. Offer by Lord Clsend probably
moi one OF msny hundred who induced contrary
to law 10 leave the Ui,ed States aud The British
Provinces there enlisted could obsniL dshase
either his apIhcaaon or on met oi this bSernheh
biz oae Of Majesty Ministers doe, not therefore IN any
rrsrect meet the demand of this Government .., -.
Lord Clarendon has placed record eerein iictsseVe
IA nun rte correctness which he says be docs not doubt
will be admitted by After duly oonsiderns them am
constrained there scarcely one OF them peais on we
merts the under discussion, which can admit without
One Ct these alleged facts rather statements which can.
the nted Government adverse 10 the scheme ana
LAT might lead to 'oaop: Of the tned S,ats sw the
snd adds expression Of regret that this Prooi OF gool
noticed appreciated by the Government o the CA'ea
fbe fact on which Lord Clarendon relies for the proof Of
good faith good will shall e shown TO be essentially differ
sni what be conceiyes to be- he will understand the
au.e hy this does spprecvte he does
In question this hind dates important When did
b,co,pe autarent that Uued States Government was
the recruiting scheme and how soon there eI was
Abandoned hope able convince Lord Clarendon that
they coemIoraneous even that Tar the ssse-t
nnber Of Objectionable committed BY the British officers
Was pc formed long AFTER this Government had IN the most
siiei ki,,b "eeT With the faii knowiedge Of these
oAcers iaI TO presume with the kho"ieose
Mr Crsmptons tercourse with these recruiting AGENTS com
n,resd in Isuafy the ith II February ne nOhed Stro
lei AID Hertz addressed to each tha he was then
give them precise instructions on the subject
m previous interview and there be no doubt mat
tie subject Nuded recruiting within the United state
scheme did not sgnihe eanty develop sei "a our pIn
ps cities until month of March Immediately therenpon
the Uni'ed States Goyern,ae. manii'ee ~ .o I snS S
suee Their Attorney at Newfork was Instructed 70
suppress enlistment il that city and prosecute those engaged
ON the 2sd Of March be called upon United Mar
,h. for hs and cooperation and addressed TO hs
oeer letter containing copy OF ths aed sstes law law
he Government is determined TO execute the laws TO theT
aIe.: extent In that letter lie employed the following
lansusge wish TO such means as may be a. yonI
command prevent any violation Of The lave OF the nied
States. which passed 10 preserve our neutraty on me
sveceedg day letter Published IN the journals Of the
City OF NtwYork the wids, circulation .nd shortly there
sner in TIE WGthinstoR ni0a and throughout the country
charged with enlstns ior
British made March their examinations be-
fore published IN the
the country their laid before GTand a1e
aud found against them. Not only In Newly fors
but Boston sdehis and other places the most vigorous
saort, publicly made By the Federal officers setns under
struetons OF United States Government these
recruitment, the British service and bring the offenders
usice No local tIasss os over more generally Known
more auisdveed II provoked much excitement
AGAINST the engaged IN II and had then been known