The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1856-03-23

The 0eiswold Davoeoe Casc--notaen 70 Va
cate the Decres HsEasrd.
The tesgaphic repsft Of the dscsion of Judge TAonp
SON in the Ptiisdslpha Common Pleas, on SATURDAY..
does Dr. Griswold injustice. Tho motion before tbs
Court to vacats the decree Of divorce granted ~
this Court in 1882 The motion was refused. JUDGE
Thompson says
ssSt motion Dunsous ,ha. didsub
they ssG1 ms'1s s
pss y wn and e .wo sscds o. col Son -
;sT,sSnu:Ssy y &. u,ssd
stated IN The Ssl 9s, pcossda
sse r. e. s
:nt bad r. upon the Court ard ssIdasny
by the sydsnss which has been sd
ne IL
ws Oh s S Ss
counsel ues her present oounssD Ahs Intentionally dE
ier time any action q The Court Sss
by hss owp sse1raon, made her haSds,Dg s.d
II now Ues ne 1
ihs she left tSs reasons hsrss 81
on hst cS stu coaauss cav
NIGH Be- adSea adopt Pos g hs appsarsss q M
ter testimony had been taken parte and submissA De
sdaucsd whc u Connection with be letter referred
aas mat ss o sss had @
Il ss =
se many sna gross charges which made aEAs e
. s @ %I9e ~
fss ss
was permitted 70 act though ali respects
.ssS
clsius impesce he proceedings either upon ground
ss sss :ss + I." B
esuscn does not appear that existed n soo
we're carried on adversely with S Dooe %
is s sp S. 81 ss s %
the truth Of he charge was attempted TO be sustsned
n st s SfFs In the Ss %
e S s:
no eouSs so wa he p,y suing ms would not Be listened 2
sen.s The party Soy such defence
ss T
Gs y her own s 5sssra
:e $: %S he
snse Vie s.esaon snser,snsl ~ 10.
or IL as ns nG wSa Ss =.
se sds os 'w s q M s ans
T. has sine. ,hs her mind become much more q
q
Fl ss sS Ss q
permitting party Who bvte suppression Of facts Aad b
q
.. ~ s.
discover peIpetraed upon repondant
s
S .Ss e s
nc..d rGs .cs y M wn but when w,s
sss .ssss tss 6s ssas s
q o Be- Nor
that II he Court has been impo.ed upon BY The Den.n M
the case: The sf The hDeiIant ". .a,.iasa 81
sns 'ss ose sueisn. nodss the
hs ~ e oy ner we rule q
ed Thus far perceive evidence Of fraud mpoto
or ssa s no S . s
donsi IL, estmon3 sLsn N der said supplemental LIBEL
a wIh exists as 70 the aod papsIs lsd in this
%s Ssa sn saa ~ 81 % s The sSass
.e,s sss,d 2 have SssS:lsn
had elect whatever upon the court 4 isdsss
SS "sss
dueed spesisl scon considered fraud or ipo
" ,o upon hs Court The main ground hsweyer upoa
Ssisy which exists ss to hs Sf decrss divorce
upon The minute took or upon the moou liss q
@ hs cU ,G, rsr DO the docket entries 10 The cave shcy
aiea and De TESTIMONY ana slhist: winch sss eS
for woS sSow van ssyhiaS IN regard o
s SDsss Ss e
ssp ass % nave % ss tss
d ss .n: S Ct Sc decree. .. 3.
9 "ss
ssna's Q which a's
show that Of the rule 70 aSow cause Va
% n e %S % 2
decree could be entered without violation Of ruls cou
her me & he ar
ID T. p was rs Ios CSsd upon the list
m1ae 30 much increased that we are compelled 70 aks tho
does 70 not @ v. s s0i: sS
S es asa % e. : ss .ss. sn
oi NOR s:y
s1; e sass s
In this absence o. All evdence Of any procsedns g.
%:
s CASE Or icp dsc sS1
@ he e. 81 e oa does ro s
sutjee 70 big motion 70 vscsss D.
Upon the decision Of the Court being pronounced Mr.
Cuyler applied to the Court for the following rue-Gris-
void vs. Grswold On motion of Mr.. Cuyler the Court
granted rule TO- show cause why the should not
be perfected by the subuon Of copies and of evidences
ef the contents Of los. papers
In Offering this motion Mr.. Cuyler, counsel for DR..
GIswod, expressed his satisfaction with the decision,
which on every moral and legal ground perfectly
Of e 70
the argument Of the case the Court would have bssn
satisfied upon that point without the slightest difficulty.
The counsel both sides had however, considered ths
fact settled and entirely unquestionabe The defects
OF the record are OF not In any way chargeabe
tie hoeilsnt nor should he be responsible for "ths
strange fatalities incident to the in which the re-
cords Of the court have been kept" Dr. rswod dear
est interests bad at all times been involved in the prsss-
vattn OF the records Of this Mr. Cuyer was happy
in the conviction that BY completing the records om
copies of the missing parts off, this strange
ard unparalleled persecution to be concluded sSd
tho coed fame and legal rights OF his client perfectly yn
die sted.
Supreme Court.
Before Hon. Judge Davies.