Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-09

anu fOlit1 VEGAS, ~ tAAAs
have notice when their atien
Rule 4th. 1t shall furti,erT
issuing subpenas for the witt
tend on the 6rsi, second, Il
Term, according to the place
Cnder the above Rules the
trial during the irst week OF
IS CASES AT JAN
1st Week.
] Den lessee vs.. Malloy;
Q Seay VS.. Cameron;
8 Morrow VS.. Napier;
s Sianfield vs.. same;
8 Pointer vs.. same;
6 Flowers vs.. same;
I Kirkman vs.. same;
S Travis VS.. Wallace;
3 Lawrence VS.. Nashville
H llsboro' Turnpike &C;
10 Shelby VS.. Martin;
IL Same VS.. WetmoTe;
12 Winston vs.. Fields;
13 Walker VS.. Bales;
II Mayor and Aldermen q
Nashville eSparte;
Is Young VS.. Corbett;
Is Doe lessee VS.. Ray;
II GJWdey use &c. vs.. Mar
shall;
IS same vs.. same;
10 Baldwin VS.. Elliott;
g. Mosley vs.. Gillian;
2i Brinkiey vs. McDole;
% York & Co VS.. Mckenzie
% McCampbell rs. Bell;
"a same vs.. Bell 4 RobSrds;
25 Doe lessee vs.. Mc Sven;
26 Jasper ct al vs.. Barns;
27 Lawhorn VS.. Davis;
2S Sloan VS.. Haskell;
20 McGavock VS.. Gilman
80 Ncfayock & Co vs.. same
81 Jones VS.. Mitchell;
81 Mayor and Aldermen Q
Nashville exparte;
33 State Of Tennessee US
&c VS.. Smell et al;
81 McCempbell vs.. Clemons
85 Jackson's Ex'rs vs.. Gil
bert & Son;
S6 Charlotte Turnpike Co vs.
Spence;
81 Cross VS.. Green ct al;
SS Evans Il Smith VS.. Shiver
ct al;
SO Forehsnd &c Va. Farrell;
~ Chilcutt VS.. Mcintyre;
Al Martin vs.. Armstrong;
~ Cruns vs.. James;
IS Charlotte Turnpike Co VS.
Spence;
Al Fay VS.. Sloan:
IS Ayres 4 Matthews vs.. GIL
bert;
s6 Hyde W. Maddox;
Al Da, Is VS.. Moseiey;
as Charlotte Turnpike Co.
vs.. spence;
49 Hughes W. Gilbert;
81 Alien vs. GOourich;
81 Frazier vs. steamboat To
ledO and owners,
SO Goldberg vs.. Hinton;
53 Harris VS.. Smiley eX'r;
81 Bank Of Tennessee vs.
Greene ct al.
- Mckee adm'r vs.. Noel,
!6 Same We. same;
- Bank Of Tennessee vs.
Erwsom;
SO McGavocS W. Paul ct al
SO Same vs.. Tucker et al;
ed " eek.
60 wilson ex'rX VS.. Goo vii
et al;
6l johnson VS.. Ra'cliffe;
62 same VS.. Orton ct al;
C3 Mdnufacturii z Compsn.
Vs HOBBS . Henly;
g. Lowry vs.. Dabbs;
Gj Adelphi Theatre Co vs.
Greene;
66 Harrison / Richardson vs.
Boiling 4 Strattou;
81 De La Vergne vs.. Dodge
6S Martin vs.. Ensley;
90 Williams X Hitchings vs.
Glover L Boyd;
% Rell vs.. Davis;
Il L K \ Railroad Co vs.
". o. Love;
u same VS.. Walker;
7S same vs.. Gee;
IA same vs.. Mayuor;
75 stme VS.. Sledge;
76 Martin vs. Fussell ct al;
u McEwen, use &c vs. Nor
ton ct al;
Is Watkins vs.. Barns;
70 Nance vs.. Moore ct al;
ST. Pa quett VS.. Austin;
S. SneVOg vs.. Roberts, ad'r
81 Sloan ex'rx vs.. ilailr;
So Carn ichael vs.. King ct a.
81 Hail y VS.. Wetmore;
SIS Wilkinson, ct 81 VS.. Clin
ard;
Sc Eatherly VS. Yinson;
81 Morse q Son vs.. Hess;
5S Nash & Char Turnpik
VS.. Spence;
SO Bell trus ee vs.. Nc Donal
81 Bell trust c VS.. Samueis
9l State Of Tenn, u-v, &c
VS.. Dodd;
92 Dotson admir- &C vs. Dabb
90 Smiley vs.. Denoss sd'mT
20 Chiidress vs. jackson,
9S Greer Va. Jordan:
96 Hammer VS.. Carroll, ag't;
81 Ament vs.. Taylor;
- DeLahay VS.. Lawrence;
% Cunningham W M'Comb
4 COlnelius
100 Mclaughlin IS. Kimhro;
iOl French VS.. Duncan, Nor
gaa q Co;
l69 Lowe sdm'r ". Sloan;
lt3 TaJ lor v. { boat Beautl
e. Al,
1o4 Gilman vs.. Kimbro;
l05 Matthewson vs. Philips;
ltG Kimbro vs.. Watson,
lUT steel IS. l. RRCo;
lhS Buchanan W. Joseph;
lr9 Nancy trustee VS. B'gley
llO Demoss sdm'r VS.. Russ i
et al;
Ill Scales VS.. Tenn. and AIS.
Railroad 90;
ii2 LOoney vs. Grizzard:
ll3 Burger vs.. Brien;
ia Austin va. Ha,s;
3 Bland vs.. Boiling;
ll6 Boyd vs.. " OOdw srlet al
III B's Of Tenn VS.. McN air,
ct al
lis Bells eX'r W. B'k OF TrnI
ilg bank Of Tennessee vs.
Mclaughlin,
l20 Jackson vs.. Bell;
III Anthony, jT., vs. Jackson
lI2 be-ch vs.. Pointer u,e &C
vs.. Bell;
1928 Baker vs. jackson.
LA Bowen ct al vs. Steven
con et al,
i23 Brunson ct al vs.. Hick
msn et ri.
1876 Bank, Planters -. Hud
son;
1877 Bolton ct al W. Kimbro;
l2S Berry, use &C. ". Foster
admir-
100 Garter vs.. Hamilton e. NJ
1870 Childress Vs.JohnsOD et a
iSf Same vs.. Deck Jones eta
1872 same W. Jaes son e al;
IL 8 Same vs.. Owen st al;
l3i Collins vs.. Gregory;
la5 Coz -, u vs. MountE
l36 Csrtwr ght W Smell ct al
lST ChRvous vs.. DicAiRsen ei
al;
iss Douglass ". Turnpike O.
ls9 Dickry 10 MAnufacturing
Company;
40 Dcmoss vs.. Bel;
l4i F4nning v, Bartlett:
i{2 Frng vs.. zimmerman et
al,
l43 FaTr's vs. Hundley;
Ia bOster, trustee ys. Nc
NAiry;
l45 Goodwin ". Psul et al
i4s Gre nheld 4 Co. - Man
ufactuIins Conn any.
l4I 0leav.s st A. W. Jackson
et Al;
f4S Gray Va. Holt, agent;
lfS Clover vs Telegraph Co..
Sd Week.
$50 ChiidFess ~ Mayor a Al
d-rm=n " Nashville,
ISL Driver vs.. Hitehings;
i52 Han vs.. n a L Powers,
decli-oav4w