New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-11-15
LAW INTELLIGENCE

sl1RROGATT's COURT-Nov Il-Before A. w. BRADFORD.
THE PARISH WILL CASE.
Tbo, Tileston, President of the Phenix Bank, was
under direct examination by Mr. Cutting all day. The
different interviews which Mr.. T. bad had with Mr.
Parish gone into in detail and some interesting
facts elected regarding Mr. Parishs ability to transact
business of importance.
Mr.. T. beiI DESTROYS of borrowing from Mr. p. some
5000 600 in United States Stock for the Bank in De-
cember 1853 called upon Mr.. Parish for the purpose
Of ehectng that loan. Mr. Parish seemed DESTROYS of
making the loan, and expressed this desire by Doddng
his head in the affirmative when interrogated; but
much difficulty arose regarding the security, &C., Mr..
Parish desiring security than the Bank willing
70 offer. The result was non-agreement between the
parties and the loan not effected at that interview,
apparently to the disappointment of Mr. Parrish. OH
er interviews were had regarding the same business,
which will be more infinitely gone into by Mr.. o Conor
on the cross.exaDinaton tomorrow.
This testimony has been offered to prove Mr.. Par
shs ability to transact important monetary affairs.
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT-NOv. A-BsfOre
Warner agt. Griffin.
This is an action for an Infringement Of what is
means of an artificial sicious compound resembling
The natural gum.
The Trial Commenced on Monday last, and has occu-
pied all the time SINCE large number OF dentists
and chemists have been sworn.
The principal defense is that the Inventions not new,
~ prscticed by DIR. De Labarre in Paris, DIR.
Dodge in this city, DIR. Hunter in Cincinnati aud
others.
The whole range of dental art has been inquired into
Amonh other specimens produced 'cere The teeth used
ty the celebrated aaron Burr. These teeth were man.
ufaetured in Paris and set in the mouth of Col Burr
On his death be gave them to Dr. Graham of this city,
They are single teeth, set upon plana plate fastened
to the plate by rives, and an artificial gum made Of
some kind porcelain
Another Interesting incident occurred during the
progress Of the trial. woman, after undergoing an
examination as witness, retired 10 the adjoining
and took from her mouth a complete set of teeth and
gums, which subsequently put into the case as an
exhibit, though not kept long from its owner.
The defense also insisted that the patent was void
because too vague and certain. Verdict for defend
ant. for plaintiff, ID. z. Barnard for defendant g.
Dean.
SUPREME COURT-CIRcuII-Nov lA-BeEre Jadse
GoULp.
IMPORTANT TO suIroRs IN THE MARINE COURT.
Robert II. V. Davenport ag. Michael Doady.
This action of replevln for the recovery of the
BIZ s. %. Horton, levied upon by the defendant
DOAdy by virtue of an execution issued out of the Ma
II appeared that an action had been commenced in
Tie Marine Cour against John Doe and Richard
% Roe, owners of the brig ID. Horton" by attach
mebt That after the brig had been attached amend
ment wac made inserting the name of the present
PaI uh as defendant judgment was th,n entered
sgalns. him and execution issued thereon, and the
ong levied on. The defendant named in that eIecu
aon tthe present plantifi brings replevn.
The cause was tried before Judge Gould without
jury lie had that the Marine Court had no right to
issue an seashmsnt against person By fictitious
name That the Marine Court could not issue process
except under seat That sn execution canrot be Issued
cut OF that Court except it be signed BIZ he Clerk of
sa0t Court a. person, and thst 10 DEPUTY Clerk Gao
sign any such process.
The Judge gave Judgment for the plaintiff. and as
sessed the vaiae of the properly at Is boo Esr pain
mi G.. Dean; for defendant Wheeda, & D.',;S,n w
SPECIAL TEsN-Before Judge RsosyvEiI
THE PARK BANK CASE
w Howes p esidant of the Bank art n D,,,, l.
l.. Porter 81 Al. 49,
Order appointing the United States T,ust Comuanv
VI all Dsvs properly including THAI assigned e L
fedcks the % Of October and hozsg the recstTr
10 t4kc immediate Possssson thereof with hbsty de.f
.rs 20 discharge this order asdsvts they nay
- advised.
This the third suit growing of D1Ess asnd fAuda
bn; Conir4ctg Of debt with the PArs Bach nc which
a th' Superior and two In the Supreme Court.
Before JadEe PEAsopY.
Pax BaGk AT. Robert Davis et al.
hoicn Of plaintiff 10 amend by sddipg new pate,
Frautsd
1ts' be etsf srii psneiss N te General Term