The Davenport daily gazette. [volume] (Davenport, Iowa) 1856-1869, 1856-06-05
Bel jAn,u ?. wade

We have before published the greater
portion Of The proceedings in the Senate on
the eth pit, but we make the following
extract because gives somewhat more iul-
ly the remarks OF Mr.. Wade, Senat who
correctly represAn' the large nsJority OF
the people Of the great State of olo. The
extract also shows the sentiments OF those
who agree with the programme enunciated
by Mr.. Dough-. in the early part o. the ses-
sion, ave will .ubdus you;" that was tn
text .sosn which the assault on Sumaer was
logical deduction. Brooks vas only a
practical commentator on the Dsuglas doc.
sriue, position which the Iihuois Senator
would doubtless have preferred Tor hinseli,
except thai it's generally supposed be Lacks
The physical courage thus to illustrate the
atrocicusness oil biz s~n speeches. We
give the extract
Mr.. Toumbs remarked that he was IN
ais seat al The time, aud how Mr.. Sumnet
could suppose he raw aim near Mr.. Brooss.
ne Could not tell. II might be, hat III the
confusion M. Sumner nlstook Gen Cor
man Tor him. Mr.. roosbs further sad, that
"A expressing oplniens about tie affair 81
the time seme gentlemen condemned II, hal
he Mr.. Tcomes) tod Mr.. Brooks that he
approved II,
Mr.. Rntlee, OF Sodih Csrolina, said he
had lust arrived in the city, but had he been
in Wsshn gton, he should have assumed a.
the responsibility tahen By his gallant tel
atye He denied in the most emphatic
taanner the staseme nj oil Mr.. Sumner, thai
what he asd said IN his speech was strictly
in response 10 what Batter had said on tor.
mef occasions. He understood that ihe
Legislature of Massachusetts hsd passed
resolutlous in reference 10 the affrsy, and
when these resolutions should be presented
10 the Seuate, be would speak on The sub.
leet as il deserved NoI single one 0 tbs
remarks IN relation to han Was a response
TO anything which he (BuleI) said upon the
Kansas question:. HIS isleuGs IN SuBlh Ca
roina, aud some o. Ais rlends here, though
he lBuiler) mad been remarkably moderate
in the Character Of his remarks III hse
scTupuioasly avoided saying anything u
violate the couTtesies VI Senatorial debate
and spoke neither oi The Senator from II as
sachusetts, 10 him, or about HllD.
MI, w aug shit AZ de AN pdsstU.e III Ht}t
10 SIT still and hear such principle. syowes
as on this occasion. As 81 the facts in ref
arence 10 the assault, he knew nolhin,
about them, and had nothing 10 say on Ihs
point. He was here IN pretty lean M
norlty, not more than soeut uns-fiih of thJ
Senate entertaining opinions similar to his
but wBen he heBru ii stated taGt on thI
hoor all assas~la-.ke, coTardly attack ha
been made upon man unarmsd, and har
in no power 10 deieLd Bimssll, and that h
had been slrlcken down aud utmost murder
ed, aud then heard a Senator cay that IL
approved saca Conduct, IL became d matte
OF s0lae interest sad Importance 20 all Ia
mrmeers oi las body, and especially !
The u.lIIuriiy. \ brave man could uot &c
lead Ailass4I against saCn az attack - tai
sba u.isnt be oNsfpoW cred bt numbers
but, osrsp ssersd vg hi, ave or die, "a
he, ~ii. tIhdieaIe The .shts u Liberty
DEBATE AID sAs irsruSnI vt discussion ;
ivns a. i4se. IL the pri1cipi- ann0uaes
here - ~ prevail let u cO4.e sfElisa Il
fnr coin IA. i-lsur Il seu are iour to on
ala mere " aIrel -! a maa can Gle
no ue.ieT ta4sr lAaA al Sin1,cauoH vi ID
Tights :. -soate GA tnia aSJr. II LIE;
stu sae PrlneipIrs Inat @4e IL DC approx
~ m.I ~ siio berS4i- para slIo farr
q. TIE aas VI Cog sss, lst II ss -Has
siovu."