New-York daily tribune., 1856-07-18

..,.thn. IN lAsse trasssetjDs 70 sepseate Lors
on from b soBssgueS ssd ~: ne oensuf. y.
,bn House. vsich he INVOKED shcold 'su sHm 49, s.,
sps member ofthe Goverrnss no - NJ Ursr. ..,i,utiSnsl
a. It,ns. The motion il IN oun led. has o .eh weu
,.,d IN thore who fsuoweo the b0n0soic Mogos. ~.
tl.t tbese /. no Individuality in that m moet o, sie
Government who is CHARGED oy me Sam.' hu, thst
;,b m. conJuet Of these great uansaetons ou. .na
ALI biz coleax ues are equally responsible can
the Uou.e we are prepared, 10 the fue sense oi -.
wora, to adopt the sn.i IesponaOa ,0f Sf sG. s6s
thing which Lord Clarenron fas sa,d Tb. % soa
c,a,,e Member for Inve'nees-ehire Mr.. bailn"'
h AN by referring the origin OF D. sc tfahSs'1ous
viz ,ba, act au' DorizI the CroFn !" nave
20 foreign troops for ib. purposes of the 81, nc '
rs how IN 1919, there wer. | cont know now m'ny
tIonsnnd men in anna and that nyrars after the sst
b.esn there was a great increase In the ioree W.
vbch We began while, one yeas aifer'he 'a,e :. no
commencto We / 40 OF competed tne 9uuio.' VI. " -
Which hod b. zen voted by Parlam' Mt. snau NO. -
hack 10 the discussion which took place upon a. o
I'm, the GROUND upon which proposed II, ana uPoo
vbich II right bon fiieDd the member for oAtoro
Univ, rity Mr. Gledstope) coDcurred loeaf, oes'
was that in a country whose army was raised oy 'o.,
uuta, enlistment, and not oy cons rPton, Tue ~.
Of rnnio, increasing the number OF soldiers cid nos
evil, 10 sucb an extent az to render recourse 10 ohet
means uppec4soary. That bi having become law, IL
becar The duty Of her Mslestys Governnent loo.y
II ilto effect. We heard that there were huuo ..
persons residing in the United Sto es, some ot 'oeI
B,itish subjects, some Germans, who had removed
frrm their own countries from various causes Wv
were d,srous Of joining the ranks 81 the b,pfa a,1
and to take part IN war which tSey c0nsi9o.eo " u
, riobtful and inst war Hear, b-sr Wed-terniineu
% e.vor 70 vll ourselves Of the Aid OF those per,
sops, aid my right honorable hiend NJ Ta'ttvuI
and those who eft him were parties 70 'Ds -
a ipa,ion Hear, hear cannot allow my flSh' hou
ora ole fi.bd, who must adult tnat he "~ p 80
kl.-
IN saN tbst that ry.ttm intended roley 'of .eo
hs,ment Of British subjects resident IN ,uc Dit. DILL
Provir ces but il WINS intended di-,itc,iy auu
,o on i. IDOLS conir from the United states aau
cannot allow NV right honorable tn nd 10 "wa oln-cl
q Marty IN ths, arrangement without having o9en
svsr, Of the results that mu-t dow from " tdeas,
h,arl That system was determined upon out a. .ae
osm, time tce GUverI mept determined $50 tna, uVta
; = od h. done that was at variance Tith the inu"
ric,paI laws Of the Uuted S,a'es. A citinc.on uaS
b, 81 attempted TO be Drawn between ns,ooe law ana
n upicipal law between the internal rtguat'on sou
the sovereign rights Of Daticn, out toae eopuy ha
NJ, hovu away by the speech Of mi hon. ano iSahed
f,eno the Solicitor General laug" VINO detnonstrs-
ted in the cleaIes manner that muDicipt ewceuid not
be cons trueo bey ond fs enactmehts, adu theteioe
a fal acy TO soy you can cuniom 10 the huhHiP'i 10"
Erbiod,ry enl,Inents and yet be voiatin, int1rnA.
final riobta Was the municipal law of the United
States violated! | maintain that It was not. IL was
not violated by order of this GoverDment-t was NOT
violated in consequence OF any Instructions issuoo Dy
h,
der their instruction. IL contended that II wa vio-
lated by their officers actIg hdL creety ana with over
zeal. TbOe officers deny that assertion, aad ac'oto
ing to their Interpretation Of the law OF the n1ed
Sts,. l. manif.t that they did nothing at variance
with that law Who Is to interpret that law IL
said that there was counsel ~ho gave an 0plOon ou
th.ie was also Judge who gave an opinion; ana II
Judge Kane tnew then what the law vf the Cnueo
States was then it is clear that nothing was done oy
our sgents that was volston of the law. 1t IL sad
that JUG ge Kane Sfteiward altered his opnlon; uu'
wh was that IN September. lieeavt his hrst opih-
ion in Nav. Our operations ceased inJuy, sho there-
fore 80 far as the conduct OF the sfcers oi TINS
mept s concerned that was borne out by the hga au.
thority of Judge of the Cui,ed Staes IL Is aSosAid
that hstanding, proof given to tue Govern
1T Of the United States that things were done wacn
were violation Of their laws. NO douot things
were done in violation of the laws by persons not adj
tLoilz,d 10 act by any peIeon conuls ivned py tne
British Government. Prosecutions took place, ana ia
some cases they succeeded, In Others they faled.
has be rnd that prosecutions cOu be ihsttuteu
against Mr. Champion, because he was protected by
bis diplomat character Thut argum ut does not ap-
ply to the cOusu If they had as s 6ed oy tue
United States Government, vioated the law, why
were tbey not prosecuted Hear, hearl. The right
hon. member for Manchester AIR. Glib on referred 10
the case uf Mr.. Curtis in Pruscid but Mr Curtis Was
actual, prosecuted dearl. We thought aid still be-
ii.v-, that the proceedings upon that toa were no
lair ana ius and the opinion seems TO have ex-
listed III PRUSSIA, for although mr. Curtis was COO
deured, the King Immediately ordered his release and
granted iull pardon Why did not the American
Gov rrment oct in the SAME mauDer toward our con.
sulr Or the three consus who have been dismissed
lone bay b, en- ought to trial Proceedings against
Stanley have also bt discontinued by the authority
of tie United Stse Government, and, thefefore AN
warranted in saying thai the accusatioDs against MI.
Crampio the three cObsus reef 7pon the testi"ny
OF those witnesses who admitted on oil bands to be
MT Of The vest aud bhsest character aod to be utterly
unworthy of credit Hear, hear Then 1t is said that
we tnacticed deception and conee ameht upon the
-. M. panf hS Mf
in bis conversation e the 27th OF March, stated fully
anG faily to the American Government that which they
must already have known without his statement,
nancy: that the Biiti-h Government was taking
nj. asures in Halifax to receive those persons coming
from the Unitcd States who might be Wiling to en-
gage in military service. But then 1t lr said that
Mr. CraDp'on did Lot 60 afterward to hr. Marcy aud
tell BIN cay by day what he was doing. Why did not
Mr. Marcy END for MIR. Champion If he wss informed
that proceedings takns place the part of the
British authorities which wele at variance with tue law
of the United States Hear, hearl Why, il any
ing at variance with British Law Goes
aly man suppose that our Minister for
Foreign Afars would not send for him the very nsxt
day after receiving such LfOrmstiop ask him Tor ex
punntoIs, s the matter to ths bottom and al!o@ no
misui derstsLding to exist lCheers. l. td.t tho
of'er month they allow thee things to 20 on never
seLd for Mr.. CramptOn, never tell him what it was
supposed be was guilty of doog; they ALLOW these
things to accun ulate in order that when the proper
time arrives, they may either take advantage Of then,
and oct upon them, or deal with them as matters
which do rot deserve confederation (Cheenl Tueu
ray, Sn there was abstinence on tho part of tue
United States Government from those steps which
it Was their duty to take if they thought
that the agents Of foreign nations were vio-
latiDg the laws Of the Union Hear, hsarl Bat
thtn when her Majestys Government, at a very early
penod founo that these proceeding likely TO pro-
duce embarrassment between tn. two countries, tuey
su-penoec-oi rather, they definitely stopped Of their
own accord--tkese arr sngemen,s Az TOD .entlensn