New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-05-12

~. p.,.h went Europe shortly N,e tne esseuucn ~
scs NJ Ran drawn and executed with reference 70
q. .ss.s sseeeci seeing him but ,.,es in the Oes
''s1 ,s, 'as n s he called oqasy
BE rss I. oodioil Cor hi. will never saw him again TO
have s that but did .pe,k with him. and don't reeo.
s:h S, ses d. the a.s U aa
snion Of the will Mr.. Parish called upon me, the s
Mr. o .S me S sssss e
shent come time and that be wished bic Will TO Dc % ssns
s BE- and e.
.bes, two weeks. he save me orally or giving
as 70 which he two s no. n 81. own
.n quite sS.Ss:.' he sausa Win .i
be a1 CO. and that Ie@or.sosu N, snaa draft
s have se OCas S rs sa BY TWO .! three
day. lee: md -: :s% we're sisd y him Then from
S.a ss de copied :as eSps returned
handed him t;sn ssi ~ and sIseoted
that ruI:nss With bin during this time
Uycn,. e a sss N, S w Hs W.. s,seuiss lbs
I'm vas executed In my Office, in presence o. Mns% , r.
a,rs who was the scrvene in my Office MI Perish wshed
s,s .bro:i and wished .le With hun do not
msuber any o,he, Iessop saw hun % M re S"
G and testament the presence Of Mr. Sanders and myse
and sue,ed iobecOme 'ub.erens wnes'es
ses and Of each Others both papers were handed
= a .pan ss 'GS Ss ss and snns
- syey rss ect he was under restraint and the matter
ers 20 han IN any other case occurred during
80. none az the dispositiops made by
kev All proceeded entirely from himself saw him twice AFTER
ead be ated substance that he thought Of makas eode
his changes had taken place from death during
As had not yet made his mind definitely as
the proposed alterations. or as to the eoc he said that De
osld again the subject as had drawn the WIN
he thousht had better draw the codcl Mr. Francis tn
eerg again sb-en think, In Euope he said some Of me
aed during bis remember that he stated who
ey were; he asked in that conversation, whether tho
mailing Of co1c would In way AFFECT the man eatures
Of the will except altered BY the cedc be either saed 70
btb those interviews that he did not contemplate any very
alteration In his will the only subject that recolleet
Of the Barclay street house and
Of SAID in relation TO these pieces Of
sry my strongly this-thst he wished TO
substitute the Uuonp property IN place OF the Barclay
&ee spoken Of because he TO me further on the
sSbec for not considering further On the first
eec because be going out Of town to be gone
short time after his return to town he called again and had
would further this all rscoeet in reference to it.
Adjourned
SUPREME COURT-SprcIAL TERM-MAY le-Bsfors Judge
ROOSEVELT.
Knickerbocker Building Association agt. John
Cen gwood ct s-Order that plaintiff have leave to Tile
supplemental complaint on payment OF costs g,
John De Nathbeck ct al agt. Mathew Wcks and
that issue take the testimony, &c.
SUPERIOR COURT-IS CHAnBERs-HAy lo-Befors Judge
SLossoN
Bartholomew agt. Standardization denied, but
without and without prejudice to any future application
o proceeding. -,
In the matter of o. II. Generalization denied, with
The Chief Justice announced that the decisions upon
calendar tried either the March April terms usud
10 rendered next Saturday.
-