New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1856-12-23
gotal Jntelligentt.


progress when paper to prcsthc furniture establish
of Mr.. VIM Huber, Poydras street, between ST.
Charles Crondclet Streets All have to add in regard to
the property that the action Of the elnen kept
the conaon from spreading to any serious extent that the
loss b! the destruction of Hubers store was S and that the
furniture destroyed was insured for $4,000
The worst feature of this fire. however the loss Of hui
life Among the ruins Yesterday were found the chaed
remains of man. whose identity there conid be question
The Coroner being called the matter and from the
testimony given before him. appeared that the deceased was
workman belonging in the establishment named John f.
Iaines native Pennsylvania 81 years of that Sun
dar evening had been brought the store drunk by his
employer Mr. Huber with another man named cowan and put
upon his upper story of the building that Huber and
Cowan then away came back late at night pretty in
toxicated found the re and were unable, either
through liquor fear than themselves in
sequence which Hancs burnt to denthvery probably
without having returned consciousness sufficiently
to appreciate the awful calamity had visited
Cooners verdict that Iaines to his death
burning through the caelcssuess OF VIM Huber and David
Cowan.
FIRE.-The alarm Of fire at ten O'Clock on Sunday
night, caused by the burning of frame house Good
children between Desire and Elir 1t belonged
Mrs Moason and Mrs Lawson and entirely destroyed.
SUPREME CoURT.-Ihe Auld and Walton Case.-
The final argument Of this yesterday, Messrs.
Lacey and Bradford appearing for Aud, and Rane Hunt and
L. Madison Day for Walton.
MI Lacey opened The sum Of his argument was, that the
Supreme Court bound take the SberT's
9Th November, 1855 but had the power
going behind those and Nsceainins the actual will of
the people that the testimony Of Samuel Locke aud others be-
fore the lowe court showed That Arld had $40 majority at thu,
Seventh Precinct other testimony showed that Aud had
60 majority the Ninth Precinct and iS Democratic land
cosocrcn,1, cs far Aun iu heeu e-o, roi.ceI Inv tho
Election Commissioners the different precincts in the city
The famous bundle of certificates (]ias the Black Record
produced in evidence by M Lacey, who took OCCASION
deny hat he Ind admitted in the lower court that forty of
certificates were neriurfa H. sad bp In bo ,,a F
Of then, to m ,ackn in rho and ,rrocra.s
TO sucl docun,p,ts-Ac dill not call ,,e,, r,rrri,s
Mr. Day followed After rebukinr Mr. Lacey for dwelling,
SO intensely UPON the fraud violence and murder in,rutrd IN
the American ,a in the election Under confederation with
that bundle Of Democratic pera,ie. living On tn, table before
him. he proceeded with his argument and mai, most able
and telling Use Of the hour time allotted to him v the rules of
the Court H., took M Mr. Lacevs last pontIe rejection r
na1raizel by Commissioners eAy lug the other
PORTS t" DC answered ana argued by his colleague He con
w ; I ] , t,o' " a",s ~ s
~ 49, .rni - i,. i li ,t
concarroI ,,o, ,s, , ~ "'V" ,,S o''S
cpived t,e, cord NOT h., claimed as na,, , ct FIR ,1
Nnxt lint those yn,c, ,.or, riht,, ~rtI t,+ st,t -
l,v;n, M nr;.aicr,, oxer ,,,n,tr Ior;n r, tt Irt.
States courts nctel in violation of the ons,irntfop in ,,tr
,, ocrs that ,, nv,;, ,io, -r,oss1,. ,;.. IT,, f,;
poyer of the country to Sunrcur cm,r, nl rb nferio
courts as Congress may create that naturalization is rica
act belonging exclusively to the United States courts that
Congress cannot confer av judicial bower pon courts not Of
lite own create and lat consequently the net Of Congress
couirrtiur the poyer Of naturalization anon State courts il in
direct violation of the Constitution and all naurai4aons
granted hv State courts are Illegal null and void
Mr. Day sustained himself throughout by ol,otine L s. S
pyeme Court m different State SUPREME Court DECISIONS all
bearing poiuely nr cxpcy rou the ISSUE, raised ,v him,
He further argued that, as was utterly impossible for State
courts 10 pa;,,ize aliens before the Constitution WAS adonci
md that that Instrument provided for naturalization in
manner entirely independent OF the state courts the said courts
could have NO more authority to nntraize now than they had
before the constitution was i'll existence