The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-02-23


Rspor,, ef Dessioas i t1s SypraAs Court Of s Uai,sI
States, gfh Notes aHd Digost.
BY r. Curtis of jasEes Ia r
sn.s syo Prises - per vol
THIs edition eOnpl.ss ne reported Dallas vo,.
z vs The "a series q tsss reports . IN $ voars q sa
whole.
fro the yasoss o the SaPree Court o e Uaiiaa Sidse
We approve The plan Of Mr. Iases ous Decisions q NE
By hH VIII he u ach utility The leg Pfoession and 70
eoGalry.
!ohs MCLEAN, ca % associate las'es.
JaaN 4 raTHos Asn,o@ia,s iass,os
sAnUEI nRis6sa Assoraats jusliee
RosERT e. aElER. Associate Iu-liee-
J. a. CAMPBELL, AsnocrAte jasuce.
tbs qualifications of tha aEst ihrse yanmss r.
From pbs Ckisf Justice cf fae Uniied !states.
publication useful and valuable
American have cGaTnrd the afsl
sd%ea aS is esss ' TIE eaSasr O. Mr. Issss Gurus / x f
een guaraa &c thai any work o 'h sind ansst'aasn by %
cannot f hiHk to meet the appreciation and support e The pub
United States ms courts Of State.
IULr 10, less. q. B. TAkEY.
From Judge NcLsan Of the Uaited States S4prs Court
long just reports o the
pfe IN prreai s1sseqasn.
where the dreions have besn doubted modhed overru al
JuLn IS, isss JOHN MCLEAN
From Judge CaroH Of the United Sates Supreme Court.
The-pecmen voans you have well edited ald wen
R @t I s Sos Mr. a5 ~ w os w
upesae ali other repSt Of the sapene CouFi DECISIONS
daeins hem to fa and axe 10 The
as lawyer and the judge and then the Price Is E.@sna
NASHVILLE, Iuly Al, 1855.
From Jadgs Grer Of the United States Sapre1as Court.
The Of has already rucsised The sanction aad
ta.ns The prase o ts able edior WRsn sy
decisions Of the supreme Court aeeepahe TO he bar and
syAsb9ss th- sediments and
esavroped coscealed each
fsrHg other and similar ones VIII be valaase 10 tb r"esson
dsests and worse inseres RoBEETS c. GRiEs.
PRlLABELFHA, Angusl y, ls5S.
From Judge Dan Of the United States su,,reHs Court.
kno~ns the learning aad ab,Iy Of Iodse Curtis il was With
TAX republication Of the of the Court The
ms execution u that would cneiude @s favorable
anfcipatons would be folly accomplished
Ts exclusion from ts work In the form Of statement
the eluedaia Of the aad the
points di-ea.ssd decided maj ssd oa
both bench ssd The bar from much shI and fran the los Of
wAsHIssroS, October /, less.
From the AnOrAey General Of the UHifed States.
ArroKzEr GExERILs oruuK,
September II, 1856.
have coIupfsncs yoar request
dc voaulnr noN u he eoarse o. rnsd Rspers o
cas and thar the work Peeaa qaAes
asfo
= Ia preseryaon of whatever Of primary importance n
The previous of the dsces with saving o ba
and omission secondary such editorial
Of the II whcr
essential ansrsAUdug eucieatnA of the
dects themselves
Of case, II editorial
cuFacy,
. Impression = ertrted the previous reports
In the aadu0n each of reference other
decisions Of he IN which The mentioned
T. In decomposition The edSTal nG the
Of rseuon sbnRmest, bat still
of sef bJ
derived from The original records and flies of TIE
s ol the bead tanacal
sylsbas q t1hibfs
sdiadea law, and Hl GlOOe, passing Sser
IA Judicial zrFumsnI
IN prumssa viii sBppy which @rpsibly
who Decisions q
dees tbCTef being either ABnguard
defective plan execution
Of present work, ing
sndsr acrrsssbs The legal profession
Sad prnhfAhe foF a8Y
holding highest
which h1nS ahd aa0Fn
}. Unftsd
lam, very respectfully, {. CUSHING.
Messrs. LTrrLK, BRoWE, Il Ca
From Prof Psrsons, Of ths Cassbridgs Lar School.
nf