Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-11

CASES AT JAM
Ist Week.
I Den lessee vs. Malloy;
3 Seay VS.. Cameron;
5 Morrow vs.. Napier;
4 Stanheld vs.. same;
8 Pointer vs.. same;
6 Flowers VS.. same;
7 kirkman vs. same;
S Travis vs.. Wallace;
9 Lawrence vs.. Nashville 4
II llsboro' Turnpike Co;
10 s. elby vs.. Martin;
IL Same vs.. WetmOre;
II Winston vs.. = ed;
IL Walker VS. Ba es;
IL Mayor and Aldermen o
Na-hviile eSparte;
Is Young VS.. COrbett;
Is Doe lessee vs.. Ray;
IL G,Sdey use &c. vs. Mar
shall;
IS same vs.. same;
9 Baldwin VS.. Elliott;
3 Mnsley vs.. Gillian;
81 Brink'ey VS. McDoIe;
22 York 4 Co VS.. Mckenzie;
2S McCampbell vs.. Bell;
% same VS. Bell 4 R0bsrds;
g Doe lessee vs.. McEwen;
20 Jasper et al vs. Barns;
q LawhOrn vs.. Davis;
26 Sloan vs.. Haskell;
20 McGavock vs.. Gilman
81 MeGavock & Co VS.. same
81 Jones vs.. Mitchell;
81 Mayor and Aldermen Of
Nash lille exparte;
33 State Of Tennessee use
&c VS.. Smell ct al;
~ McCampbell vs.. Clemons;
S5 Jacksen's Ex'rs vs.. Gil
bert 4 Son;
So Charlotte Turnpike Co vs..
Spence;
81 Gross VS.. Green ct al:
35 Evans & Smith vs.. Shivers
et al;
80 Forehand &c va. Farrell
40 Chilcutt W. Mcintyre;
4 Martin vs.. Armstrong;
42 CIunl VS.. James,
q Charlotte turnpike Co v,
Spence,
81 Fay VS.. Sloan:
10 Ayres & Matthews vs. G !
bert;
s Hyde W. Maddox;
AZ Davis VS.. MOSeley;
IS Charlotte Turnpike Co.
VS.. Spence;
80 Hughes Va. Gilbert;
81 Allen VS.. Goo rich;
VI EAaEiNl ~ . oftdtluodA ~
ledo ana owners,
80 Goldberg W. Hinton;
SO Harris vs.. Smiley ex'r;
81 Bank q Tennesser vs.
Greene ct al,
IS Mckee admir- vs.. Noel
g Sane vs.. Same;
- Bank Oi Tennessee vs.
Nswsom,
IS Mcgavock W. Paul ct al
80 Same vs.. Tucker et al;
I'd ~ eek.
60 wilson eX'rX VS.. Goo win
e. al;
81 johnson vs.. Ra'cliife;
62 same VS.. OrtOn ct a.;
IS Mdnufscturi < ComPan,
V, u bnS . Henly;
64 Lowry vs.. Dabbs;
e. Adelphi Theatre Co VS.
Greene;
&c Harrison & Richardson We
Boiling 4 Stratton;
81 De La Vergue vs.. Dodge;
Is Martin VS.. Ensley;
% Williams x Hitch ngs ".
Glover 4 Boyd;
~ Bell VS.. Davis;
Il l. 4 n Railroad Co vs.
n. o. Love;
70 same vs.. Walker;
70 same VS. Gee;
u same vs.. Maynor;
20 same vs. Sledge;
70 Martin vs.. Fussell ct al;
II McEwen, use &C vs. Nor
ton ct al;
. Watkins yS. BARNS;
~ Nance VS.. Moore ct al;
81 Pa quett VS. Austin;
5 Snegog vs.. Roberts, ad'r;
50 Sloan ex'rN vs.. Hale;
~ Caru ichael v. King ct al;
ST llail y Us. Wetmore;
- Wilkinson, ct al W. Clin
ard;
Sc Eatherly VS. Vinson:
81 Morse & Son vs.. Hess;
5S Nash 4 Char Turppike
vs.. Spence;
50 Bell trus ee Va. Nc Donald
81 Bell trust { VS.. Simurls;
9l State OF Tenn, Use, &c ,
vs.. DOdd;
% Dotson admir- &c vs. Dabbs
90 Sm,lry W. Den O-s adm,
~ Childie,s Va. jackson;
% Greer vs. Jordan;
81 Hammer W Carroll Ag..
" Amcnt vs.. Tay lof;
- Dsl.shay vs.. LaWrence;
90 Cunningham vs. M'Combs
4 Cornelius;
ln0 Mclaughlin ,s. kmtro;
l0t French We. Duncan, Nor
gan & Co;
i02 Lowe admir- ". Sloan;
ltS raJ lor W. 5 Boat beauty
et al
TEA Gilman vs.. Kimbru;
l0j Matth5wson vs. Philips;
80 kimb, vs.. Watson;
luT steel 5. l. & K kCo;
iOS Buchanan vs.. Joseph;
it9 Nancy trustee va Il Bgley,
llO DemosS admir- VS.. Buss-il
ct AZ;
III Scales vs.. Tenn. and Ala.
Railroad Co;
ll2 Inoney vs.. Grizzard;
il3 Burger W Brien;
ll4 Austin W.. la s;
| . Bland vs.. Boiling;
ll6 Boyd ". u oodvariet Ell.
III LII OF Tenn vs.. McNairy
et al
us Bells ex'r vs.. Blk Of Tenn
Ii9 bank Of tennessee vs.
Mclaughlin,
1870 Jackson vs.. Bell;
lzl Anthony, jr., W Jackson.
lZ2 tee ch IS. Pointer u { &C. {
VI. Bell, I
1923 Baker vs. jackson.
Ii Bugen ct al vs steven .
son et NJ. [
i25 Brunson ct 81 ". llick .
man et "a. :
1875 Btuk, Planters vs.. llud +
son. I
l2T y, ltJn et e. vs.. Klmbro; (
rs Berry, ule &C. ". Foster 1
Adm'r z
Carte vs.. Hamilton etAi
iI0 ChihiTess vs.lohnso, eta (
taI Samr ". d, c Jones et all
1872 same W. JAG son e al;
i.3 Same vs. Owen et a.; Z
iA Collins w. Gregory;
la5 COuss n W. AlounfL: /.
l36 CarJwr ght " smell et al /.
iSI ChAyous yB. uickiurpn Ell.
al.
l2s Douglass ". Turnpike o. !
l39 Dickry vs. Manufacturing
Company; /
100 Demoss vs.. Beii; I.
I4i Ptnuing " Bartlett: {.
~ frlng W. Z mmefmAn Ct
Al, /!
~ Farrs vs.. Hundley;
l45 Foster, uuuee vs Nc B
Nary; I
20 Goodwin ". Paul c sl
.4g Grrt nfeld a Co ts Man
ufArtuIiug Conf any.
az Gle-v.s ct al Va. Jackson .
- Al;
a. Gray ". Holt, agent:
49 Glover W Telegraph Co.
I'D Week.
81 ChiriTesr W. NAyor a AL !
drrmrn " Nashville;
81 Driver W. iiiiehiuEs; Z
80 Han W " 4 L Powers; !
decli-oag4W
Valentines
II HI IP =.