Lynchburg daily Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1852-1861, 1856-09-11
. .

TnE CHARLESTON MrRcuRY, although it goes
with its party in support Of Mr.. buchanan, cvi
IDENTIFY expects no good to result 10 the co lntry
from the success OF the Democratic patty and its
candidate. In late article it suys, ,ne uling
of that party:
Eyen that party most acceptable 10 the soqsl AMI
for whose nominee this state viii vote. his, in tn
last few weeks given way point after pau.. Ga In
ternal Improvements it has rfal,ai. aud even sln-
passed. the widest dream of rNtraNavanra. On the
Tam, the Democratic plrt1 though stttpel IN Piled
Pes 10 Free Trade. atd though thu Govern nent la
hors beneath The burdens md rarrlpliou3 on ..lf-
plus revenue wrnug hnu the industry of the South.
Is rs unsoaud rs Northern manuuelurers pn1 North
western spollsmen could wish II The Southern MIN
Who looks for Low iaia from lhe Democratic p.a-
y. il a miracle Of delnsou.
md when consider the last aud greatest les-
lion. where ia the pemocrIle party six years ago,
the south elected from California by thetrium "a
OF sqnatter Sovereignty TWoy year, upo that sum
doctrine, coupled with the repeal of the Missouri I
Compromise line, was cngrnited upon the kansa ;
bill. II was the deli serAte, eruNninp act of the De
morratic party; and the South asscncd TO it, though
already vietimised by it, in the hope that its prnei
pies faithfully maintained would secure Kansas
slave labor But what have We seem la the tort /
OF repeated pledges on the part Of is leaders in tn
face The Nebraska net itself which conferred soy
ereigrty upon the Territorial Governments, aud re
moved them beyond cuneres =. ,at,lcreuce-i A
the htce of all this, Mr. Douglas AMI others high i
Democratic influence. have actually proposed 10 re .
peal the Territorial uws of kansas and thus tram .
pie down its admitted sovereignty beneath Congress
ional intervention. They have written, with thei
own hands condemnation upon their own act: the ?
have repudAted the most Wanted doctrine OF the De
mocratc party" popular say ereienty.' The prin d.
cple OF the Nebraska act. upon which the Democrat
ic party hid its claim 10 Southern support is no Ion
ger popular Sovereignty hut any thing which Abo
huon In its wdncsS, would make H. When presse |
10y the sentiment of the North its Northern supper
iers are willing to swallow all their pledges aud in o.
stall again the dethroucd idol of Congressional epsla
ton And II Representative from South Carolina "A
loud advocate of the same measure is found stil |
lower in the downward path calling upon the Presi
dent 10 strange the Judiciary, that hnaticism ma Y
be appeasedl
These are indications startling indications, whc /
no true southern man can disregard Abolish Ter =
rtorial sovereignty in kansas-rcpeal its laws-au I
the South while raising the Democratic party -
power upon the Lopcs of the Nebraska bill will find
herself deirauded OF her just expectations and cxcu-
dol rom Kansas. That the leaders of this party
should be ready to commit such an act of reachery
warns MS OF what we may expect. Ii procaims in
our very ears that not only upon Internal Improve
ments and the Tariff but that upon the Nebraska bill
itself, the Democratic partyi is unsound and ready
even now to sacrifice the South. Who, we ask, can
blind himself to such Indications