Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-11
CASES AT JANUARY TERM. Il

he term
JARY TERM, 1876
lhS Lstcher vs. Hudson;
l5& lowe vs- Sloan;
th5 Moore vs.. Hughes;
1856 Merritt ss. Benson et al:
1881 shaeklett vs.. Gilman;
Il55 Stewart vs.. Eimondaon;
lIt9 State Of Tenn use &c vs..
/ russell ct al;
ii60 Tresiway & wife rs.
Z Goodwin admir-
ISL Wallace VS.. Ackha;
1872 Thompson tru. vs. Tenn.
AMI Ala. Railroad 90;
ii63 Williams vs.. Glover,
1854 Beatty vs. Ciodfelter;
1856 Tiilmsn Va NiliiamS
il6i PetNay ". Wilson ct al;
81 Dunn vs.. Kreider.
lbs Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
Co vs.. Marlin;
l69 Shute vs n 4 Q Railroad
Co;
10 Ewing trustee W. same;
Iii N L c Railroad Co vs..
Douelson.
iT2 Lanier & Falls VS.. vanlier
IT3 Livingston vs.. Nah. Gas
Light Co;
liza Gilman VS.. Wright:
lT5 Lanier 4 McNickle Vs.
Vanlier;
l7s Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
III Young VS.. Summerhill;
IFS Corporation Of Nashville
VS.. Rayford;
it79 Same vs.. Higgins;
$50 Same v . Raiford;
81 Same vs. sSme;
1872 Same v Hamilton;
.lS3 GoG vs.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &c.
ie4 Crutchel vs.. Foster
SIS Childress vs.Mammel ct al
.iS6 Cantr. ! vs.. Sloan;
l51 Doe. lessee, vs. Waggo-
lSS brigham VS. trattOn ct al;
lS9 Same vs.. Craighead;
t9J Same vs. Havs ct al;
Ig1 Bacchus W Porter;
t9 BOsl-y VS.. Welch
50 Co,e vs.. Mayor and Al
dermen Of Nashville:
i94 Davis VS.. Bradley.
l95 Douglas VS.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
.l96 Frazier, trustee, vs. Hin
tn;
9! Glover 4 Boyd, use &C
vs.. Onett.
IS Goldberg 4 Co. VS.. Insu-
rance Co.
80 Harris vs.. Pitts;
2'D Hays vs. Edmundson ct al
u Horn and wife vs.StewsTt;
2 z Lellystt 4 Ewing We. Mills
4 kean;
203 Hollins vs.. Ry man ct al;
9 1 HaltoWeil & Co vs.. uu e
2U5 Hammond & Co. ". Lu-
cas- et al;
ln6 Housley W. Hsgan ct al;
07 HOke a bro. v. jackson;
2US HamWell vs.. Tell graph
Company;
20e JrhnsOn ys. NoOl c ct IL,
2 0 James a Co. vs. owen ct
I'll Insurance Company v.
Peck & al;
liz Jenkins ". Bu h ct al;
: 3 Kerby vs.. BrOeAw y;
~ Lirsty W. Bridpe Co.;
2l5 Mckinney vs.. Shelly;
2l6 McCsDpbell, trustee vs..
Hicks et al;
2l7 Same vs.. Mirr;
is Nc ut sh VS.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
2i9 Nara vs.. Insurance Co.;
90 Mdnoy vs. TurnDike Co.
III McRobertS 1t al VS.. JACK
con;
222 Oldham Va. Pau, eX'I;
% Petway Va. Crulcher e. a..
"a Pope vs. Washington.
4th week.
225 Mining Company vs,
NJ tchell 1t al.
226 Murrell vs.. MasOr and
Ald'mn Of Nashyi le;
221 Minnett 4 Wihcoop vs..
McCOmbs ct vi;
rs Morgan 4 Co. VS. Vick-
house:
229 Mills va. Stewart;
40 Mart n vs. Beatty.
20. M~Tell & MAtlock vs.
Tenn 4 Ala. u K. Co;
2e2 Ovens VS.. johnson;
233 Porte he'd IS. Beatty;
234 Stewart 4 90. vs. Hume;
.235 Same VS.. BOwl'nI;
236 samuels. by next friend
VS.. Mayor a Aldermen Of
Nashville;
2 ! Shegogg vs.. Simms:
235 Wright vs. Crenshaw;
2i9 2 mnt rman vs. McNairy;
240 BAnk OF Tennessee vs..
Ham, ton et a.;
241 Camuse vs.. Patterson;
2t2 State Of Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson et al;
2 8 Bell vs.. Welch;
24t Guthrie and wife ".
Rains;
45 Jordan VS.. Davidson;
246 rOrler v. Berg n:
I4I LIVINGSTON ~ Mayor and
Aldern en- of Nashville,
24S Barns vs.. Gilman;
: . Rams ". William;
30 Ch.ldresS W Owe
-5l Corporal on OF Nashville
vs. Hamilton;
252 S me vs.. II Fgins;
F!3 same vs.. FINN;
15I same vs.. GurnAnd;
! 8 Ballentine W. HroVn;
256 WOOaElk vs.. y. and G.
RsiIrosd Co;
PSI Mayor & Ald'men Nash
vile expar,e;
25S Mayor 4 Al mn of Nash
vile eXpaTte;
259 Olds W McFadden;
go Campbell VS.. CfenshaW
et Al,
esl CorpOration vs.. Moore;
262 Morrison W. Graham;
!68 Same vs.. same,
lf4 Same Vs. same;
l65 Same vs.. same;
l6 Same vs.. same.
g. Same Y. same;
6S PnksTtOn vs.. Crensl sw
et a.;
} Q Smith A Co. W. Same;
sTO Same ~. sam;
lTl sane W. SAINT,
~ anne ". sam
lTS ChildTess vs.. Hampton
et al,
lT4 Jones' vs. y Ince;
- Ltaku ". HaIell.
10 tfey ct Tvs. knight etAl;
II Jackson ". Heil;
5 Dodd " Henry a Skinner
,rs Pope vs. " ashingtOn;
81 same " same,
~ Same vs. samr;
So Peck 4 Bliss vs. Mort6n;
rs Pointer " Bell;
"a Pspin " Vo.sot;
.s5 Pr / vs Carter ct el;
~ Par IS W Jackson
81 Sesy, trustee " TArpley
APyle;
IS Shute ys Blsley,
- -tevens vs. Hamilton et al
20 shute " Had y et al:
81 same " Williams e a.;
~ Van iiyke, afim'TNs Peal
~ NHidrun vs. ScrugEs;
% Warm. th " q ssy;
95 Nhit8orth vs ssaluny =,
1;
2S Wesi vs. Brown;
" warren " linton Rsut;
o. Allori vs. Scales sK'r;
- Glraves e. al adm's vs
kozsli q a,
Oo Same v GoOtlett CT al,
~ same " ksst et ~;
= hiis n " Carter;
. 3 WhiicmAn " Carter;
gt LGnier a McNirkle We
Ewing, Dick 4 Co;
THO. 7. sNgi.FY. clerk.
for iS56!
q a u A Ms,