New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-09-17

New York were thus violated. ano nere couio oe nc
ex, ressicn of public opinon-through it there would be
revolution in "a hours. There are major rights and
minor rights. The latter may be given up TO con-
vep, nee or any other cause but major rights no man
has any rights to make any bargain or to leave them
undeknded, [chesr]; and when the South provence,
FreeStaie men in Kansas from voting in an open land
they struck blow at the very heart OF our Polti-
cal system. BY such corrupt means bogus
legislature was elected in Kansas and Governor
Reeder refused TO give certificates Of election to some Of
IFS members All that our fathers ever protested
against in the Revolution could not compare to the
outrage Of putting in foreign body Of men as Legs-
lature. Suppose Great Britain had raked up some OF
the scoundres of London and sent them to this country
MES; they would have been blown sky high in mo-
nent Cheers When this Legislature sat, what was
the fruit that il brought forth 1t labored and its
frst'bon was Slavery Laughter like begettng like
teri. Yet it will be recollected that the
Missouri Compromise was abrogsted for the love of alb
stract principles tLaughterl Then they declared that
twas an oense punishable in the penitentary print
hold slaves. This the prelude to allowing people
to Judge of the matter of Slavery and then decide for
themselves whethet should exist in the Territories or
not. Here, gentlemen is a chain, which, in fulfilling
these Infamous and informal edcts. was put about the
legs Of two free men, because they were Prostate
men; and thus manacled, they were compelled
to walk distance of 90 miles, until the chain
had worn itself through their flesh to their
of about FIVE feet in length with two padlocks on
it. II had been sent to him by a resident of Kansas.
The exhibition Of the chain created great sensation
This chain show an evidence Of what appreciation
there is free speech and free press by MssOurans in
Kansas SHANE, shame Yes, il is a shame and South
ern legislation now trample under foot Loud cheers
After the passage of these laws officers were appointed
Men csuld not be found but creatures could and they
themselves to be fit to execute those laws. They
mitted outrages under the color of nw and without
the color of law Murders, arsons, lynching arcenies
rapes scaping, were committed; and these things,
oueh they shock the moral sensbiities are yet not
bad ar the violation of bal0tbox. The South, then,
having done all these things in times past to extend the
area Of Slavery and keep up slave representation in
Congress- the question is now to be decided what Is
right and what is wropg-not by South Carolina nor
Aikansas--but by the whole people, and whether you
vote for Buchanan Fillmore Fremont you will vote
for one of ro sides only-eher for Slavery for Lib
erty. God has brought up this question to test our
love Of Liberty pety and our PATRIOTISM and every
vote given for Buchanan or Fillmore will go right to
the heart Of Liberty, and every vote for Fremont will
20 tight TO the heart Of Slavery The question then is for
meh Of the North, Will go for Freedom and her nsti.
tutioDs or will 90 for Slavery and its institution
object to the Cincinnati platform because It has an
nointed James Buchanan as the king Of the South.
james Buchanan is the ineal descendent Of Frank
Pierce hut hope he has not descended far Laa teri.
He tyyies and represents the will and deeh OF the
South during the past ~ years. object to him there
for. object to Mr.. Fillmore because he attempts to
introduce an issue in this which cannot be in
oouctd. do not say that the American party has not
had reason for its organization do say that has
not done much good by breaking up old parties But
object to him. also because Of his cvasve and equiv
coating course on the subject OF Slavery He has made
up his mind about Papacy and foreign immigration,
but on the great question Of Liberty he gives Opn
ion except that he is for the Union. Between Slavery
and Liberty he goes for both, and he means to be
II has often been said, "Why does not Col Fremont
come out and say whether he is Catholic NOT =
III engage that when Mr. Fillmore comes out and says
whether he is for Freedom Slavery that Col Ere
Laughter. Yet one of these questions is private
matter with which have no business, and the other
is question of great public importance lCheersl.
was born Of race who sacrificed their all for con-
science and will never disgrace my a nc
to you, but such is the fact lLaughter. First,
am for him because | have an, opportunity
Of voting for whose hand can shake and cali
is urged as an objecton, because he has never had
any experience in politics laughterl After seeing
the conduct of Messrs. Van Buren,, Polk Tyler Fhl,
ore and Pierce who had had experience in politics,
to say of him that he has had any experience in
politics fCheers Whom other mon wnre intriguing in
rolitics John G.. Fremont was in the mountains expor
ING wilderness and with character pure and unsul-
led shall vote for him because Of his executive powers
for believe that God has given him the capacity to
lead lChtenl. What our politicians gain by expert.
en- e..
tCbe.rsl. He has honesty, is discriminating among
men has natural capacity to control and commando
and no man has these qualities higher Next to VIM
field Scott think should select John G. Fremont as
tie best example of commanding genius. Statesmen
in Washington would have utterly failed in the posi-
ton of Col. Fremont in hIs exploring tours, or
in California during the Mexican war Cheers
Besides these qualities he is on the right side and with
THE side Of Liberty and the side Of Liberty only,
and there will stand to the end" Now, then as to
his Catholicism will state to begin with, that If he is
Catholic he has as good right to be Csth0lc as
tant minister. This country tOlerates the religious
opnions of men. Woe is the day when any body OF
men are put down because of their religion Cheers
If Mr. Fremont were Jesuit or Priest, under their
fcinl relations to foreign dynasty, it would make
some Inference. But if he were COMMUNICATE OF q
Roman Catholic Church, it is nobodys business. 1t is
the American doctrine and has been from the begun
nng and 1 hope il may be to the end,
government party, or body Of men, but to his God
slone ICteers In tho exercise of that right, j. C..
Fremont was reared by q Protestant mother and at
tie age of sixteen years was confirmed by Bishop
Bowen of the Protestant Episcopal Church, and hi:
children have been baptized in the same Church, and
no is at this day as much Of Protestant Epis-
copalian as any Bishop Of that Church: ! don't
believe there can be seen in any history sue.
Fremont because of his supposed Catholicism
On Monday last, the Rev. DR.. De Witt, the Rev
DR.. Robinson, the Rev. DR.. Adams the Kew. Mr.
Field visited Col. Fremont After other conversation
thew asked him if he had beon educated Protestant
Enseopalian. He said he had. They tbep inquired
she lad ever renowned these doctrines, and he said
he had never had reason to renounce them Then
thew asked. "Are you, or have you evef beens Ro-
man Catholic7" He said. :" am not nor have ever
been' ICheersl. Gentlemen, these men will give this
fact in next Thursdays Er0neeia. What thenl twill
he published on Thursday morning and on Thursday
night The Eage'; vii! have , Pa RaragTsph hs'ed "a
wonder TINT man who will publish