Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1856-08-23

Abiding to the fact that the geusrou. toll" of making
out for Buchanan ia relation to the "bargan and
corruption" SANDER has appropriately enough fallen to the
part OF Jas u. Clay OF Henry Clhy-a son whose fl
al for the usops memory Of his civarc Ia
Their prompted him, former OCCASION tracin that
ithes memory saleabe commodity Tor tie granfca.
ton Of his b,undess avlrce correspondent Of the
Baltimore A0erictp shows, 10y reference 10 facts docu.
ment- and dates that the letter OF Krein which Jas b.
Clay SAYS originally instituted the charge against Henry
Clay. merely the publication of Buchanan. yeriovs
verbal disclosures" to Gen. jackson. we append Dor.
ton Of hi. communication which ia-ien the vile SANDER
upon Buchanan beyond the power Of all h friends TO r..
leve him from IL:
Kremcfs letter pubishedin the Columbian (Phila)
Observer, dated Washington Jan 20 1923 Carter
Beverly litter appeared two years later in tho Fsyeto.
Vile n. O. Observer dated Nashville March 8 1927
Gen Jackso letter to Beverly bears The date Of the Her
uitagr, June o. 1927, and his address TO the Public
that Of the Hermitage, july Is, 1927. Garter Bsyery's
letter reefate- the authority Of & .n Jacksou fb.
charge made in Kfcnefs. Gpn Jackso ~ letter Of June
n support Beverly and his address NJ Jnly ion defence
NJ himself IN W the slauderous chs-gc u "bargan aud
corruption b. distinctly made sud repeated 10 almost The
very same language
Gen jackson -ys "ihe disclosures Of bargain and cor
upuon made 10 him by distinguished member of
Congc-s-Hr James Buchanan. and that the distinguish.
I'd member bad previously communicated the came disro
'urcr Substantially Maj. Kltou Jac.sons colleague
Tie further lJs that they made 10 conversation
fdr0 d" Ii"HnrN 1876 MAJ Eaton say IL iH Jaau0.
rN 1876 aud Buchanan himsef says the conversation
took place about che 2d ~ JaHHarV, %. Nov Efc.
ers letter u lated, stated above JHnpry 25 1920
II The co' Of The month, and time ger the "iisclo
'ures u Buchanan a. Eaton and jackson. And Krrmer
poor dup, although Dee had been induced n assume The
responsibility O ts contents, afterwards denied that be
Sts the aor ~ the fffer TO the Columbian Observer
ind confessed that at the tme he avOwcd himself a. its
author he DID not comprehend the infamous nature
" The calumny be- made 10 charge upou NJ t1,vf
Who then, Wa the author Of the "Krener letter." Hen
~ Clay IRON many cDroboatug circumstances located IL
upon MAJ Eaton, aud that individual could not aud did
not deny ~ authorship When directly charged with IL by
hr Clay The fact that MAJ Eaton bcpg the author Of
the "kremef letter IN connection With tie previous '.
closures OF buchanan N Eaton and Jackson demonstrate
~ once the whole origin Of infamous SANDER Of "bar.
gain sod corruption IN the language of Henry CLAY
him-e IN his address "To the Puicr-"Irpor the sun.
position that the kremer letter was prepared by Ma,
h'on Ne can at once comprehend IT, lie Eatonl wa.
perfectly appfized ~ III that had passed between Buch
anan aud 1scksou The coincidence 81 the language EN-
poyed ~ the kfemef letter to the Columbian Observer
with that OF Cen Jacksons 70 Carter Beverly very sr