Litchfield enquirer., 1856-09-04

Inc co1amne - sno1f IT 8ex Icqsnal, s1Eosd but lltils spaoe fdE 1 < ennltoo Nc eszhUs however al.e1ln Assa - 1lsliss1 Il tn time, ,@leaersy " - . ? ' yoatiIful ssq5ssrants I6r q |sls. zsseS &$ ' - f.sIE sanss ' .sis mal nlak q ma V as fhe ev Hen1y wsfd Bssszer n ne LII pl.ce, whas religion do. .tl,ese dflss and cod nolals pro<ess what church do tllcy Attsll Ah, t would puxzle wiser disinss than ou1s to andesstand their ethics, and the sex yoa ahoe leasf nsver vill gfow less from waiting upod them at ths doosof the sanctuary. No nan xnf svidshce of christianity h their c0snt toenf sse nablnI deprayity and the preach ing If Johh. Knox would hsrdsn their hearts Yet, thsb gsntls sdoselike saah. and pure. earnest spr- 10 tse ahockea lt clersynAan doing to day, what the rostle Paal dil on Man hill. Nov VIC deny t and opposition to the Administr delivers Aoliticek allress except az the s.ofd palicy and pAlitit afe synonymoua No, the question is simply caenf pure inorality and whoever nay be the lead CTS Of tho palty t does not alter the principle Bad ieen aze fo be fund everywhere and if bad men mofe iA this -demonststion of the Free North. the character sf M platform is not to blame for it. The Ref. H. '. Beecher in airocat;ng he cause of the Republican party. seeks to perpetnate the doctrines tadght by Christ and his apostles Now .whosseks to throv aspersions upon Paul because he preached onthe hiils. and in the market placc' and whodoes no adnirc the christian fortitude and manly deter
 nination that led him to speak openly to the Ephe sians of their crying sins! Has the christian minis ter o today less right to preach the doctrines of the sermon on the ,unt has he less right to cry out against our lcaiing sins
 Is the Rev Mir. Beecher politician because he de- hounces the murder of the Irish water by the crea- trre Hcsbertf s.Thou shalt not kill says the ffth commandment. Is be fanatic because he opposes the golden calf uofship of office Thou shalt have no other god before me- says the first article of the decalogue. Ishe an exciter of disunion because he cries out against the sin of profanity in no place so shamefisoed as in Masaingtons Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain. sai,l the tables of the h~- Is he promoter of heresy because he speaks of the detling of Gods holy time ey the discussing of slavery in Congress, after the dawn of the sabbath mouingl :. Remember the sahbath day and kcspit holy " is the testimony. Is he opposed to the Union because he reproves the sin of removing ancent Iani-marks, and of obliteratns the names of Washington and Jetfersons .sTnor
 thy father and thy mother reads the table. Is h, 2 dfuscr of pfatical doctrines because he lifts his prayer in opposition to system which recognizes iadcity separates families and openly sustains in cest Thou shait not commit adultery" says the testimony. Is he vile, bad man because indignant
 s he npndate the lies that are told of our brothers in Kansas . :. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. is Gods word And is he a rabid politician because he opposes the desires of an nexation and agrandizcment! .Thou shalt not coret thy neighbor's honse. is the scripture. And ,is he asickea incendiary because he breaches, "A new eoaanandment do give unto you that you love one aiiother?" isno politician no inccndiary ne is simply God.fearing chrst.loving minister o Heaven religion fighter of tho devil, soldier O, the crnss And xA Houd advise yop. ye sainted ones standing hy the asaysde and volunteering opinions to initiate his christian character and be emulaus o his christian virtaes; to flee like Lot out of Sodom ere the flames ovcrtake you and you go to your onu place.