The daily union., 1856-01-29
heard ,he satssat Of his colleague r CAnrBri at the

heard the statemeat OF his colleague Mr. CAnrsrt at The
time and had intsntion Of misrepresentng him lie
had high respect for his eoles Rues honor as be Mr.
CAnPBELL had for hs own Ia all probability, and be made
charge against him The letter bad been written 10
spirit Of indignation from the impression which the annir
had made upon him His colleague had spoken OF ms
honor and OF spreading these things abroad over the State
Of Ohio, and letting them go home TO his Ar W's CON
sttnents Ho Was perfectly content that ms eoneague
should send anything he chose TO his constituents Tor hey
would believe that lac bad made charge against
him doing him injustice There man on the hoor
Of the House american European Asiasuc' Or african u
he renewed laughterl He happy TO find that his
colleague dscsimed any knowledge of the resolution Of
ered by the gentleman from Iowa. and happy 10 admit the
full length and breadth of the disclaimer.
Mr. w then refer to that part OF his letter in
which he commented upon the course OF the democrats
southern Americans and scatterers and TO defend what
he had there asserted H..# +.
Mr.. DUNN of indiana replied TO Mr. WADE, defending
himself Of the scatterers and charging upon the
supporters of NJ BANKS the disorganizon OF the House.
because of the persstency with which they adhered 70
their candidate and their refusal to compromise with those
who In their anti-Nebraska sentiment were with them
but who could not vote for Mr.. b.
Mr. BENNETT of Mississippi, stated that he was not ~
the House at tho lime the resolution offered declaring
Mr. CAMPBELL Speaker being confined TO his room by inds
position He regretted it, not because Of the resolution
which he should have voted against but because he had
lost the opportunity Of voting for the reception OF the Pres
dents message which met the cordial approval
Of every southern heart and the ready response Of every
lover OF this Union
Mr. BRENTGs, Of Indiana, had been called upon by
friends and asked whether he did not intend to
pei attack which had been made upon him by the
pres He desired give those who had thus assaed him
ar opportunity set him right before his constituents and
the country and upon their failure to do proper time
being given them be should avail himself OF his rights
member of the House and American citizen TO meet
these charges. as4 ft
Mr. STEWART of Maryland submitted the following
resolution, and recommended its adoption:
Reoed That inasmuch the directions of the act of the
Congress the United States entitled regulate the
and OF administering certain oahs passed at the
session. be carried and do mot to
ply existing condition o this House, and under these
the Sd clause OF the 9th article Of the const
Of the United States s fully obligatory and ought In
the spirit Of that clause, TO be reousy observed the
Clerk OF this House hereby directed administer the
oath or affirmation Of the House support
consultation of the United States in the form prescribed
by the first section of the said statute Of 1882 chapter
tion 1. as8sa
The question taken the resolution and 1t was
not agreed TO. a#8
TCries Of "Cai the rollT] .sa a...
SPEAKER.
The House then proceeded to vote for Speaker.
The Clerk called the roll for the hundred and wen-
ty-eighth time, with the following result
Whole number of votes 206 necessary to choice l04
OF these
o Mr. Banks received. d............................ 81
Ut
n d. fuHer.... 30
fennth9t0n y
.#t
There being choice, the House, motion of Mr..
JONES, of Tennessee, at o'clock adjourned