The daily union., 1856-12-13

American aggression the British government and press
have right perpetual interference with not only he
foreign policy, but the domestic affairs, Of the Ul..yd
States II would that II does business with
another the Times thinks he has right to interfere with
his household affairs superintend his domestic economy
investigate the condition Of his servants and dive into bis
kitchen to see he has any negroes there. Furthermore
the Times is Of opinion that be is in duty bound to take
care that ali persons with whom he has any dealings
should receive the benefit of bis advice and protection
Now, Great Britain has dealings with all parts OF the
world, and according to this reasoning, has righ-nay
1t is her duty-to take all the world under her protec-
don-from the 6ibusters most especially. Everybody
must know that Mexico, Central America any
portions of the southern continent in possession the
United States the of Great Britain with them
would increase extent which scarcely bg
estimated first by the energy and activity OF the pop
ulaOn and secondly by the adoption of those principles
of trade which form parto the policy Of the American
government Unless therefore, the Times is blind
than give it credit for the British government must
have other motives than those here put forward for
taking such deep though certainly not friendly interest
in the foreign and domestic affairs of the republic II
would perhaps be assuming undue importance suggest
that this ocitude the progress of the United States
may possibly originate in apprehension that ii may
one day become an obstacle TO that of Great Britain
The Times-haying reiterated the old weather-beatn
sngsong of the friendly relations between the two
tries and the sincere desire of the British 10
and them by ties of amiyproceeds
demonstrate sincerity of those professions in lis usu
conclusive style II more than nsinuates that the man
with whom these friendly relations TO be maintained
nf noliticians who
have no principles or policy but what they believe the
Embodiment of the notions which for the time being
dominant in the American democracy According to the
theory OF this government it is the duty of President to
administer according the notions Of the people by
whom he is eleced-that is, in conformity with the
principles of foreign and domestic policy which he
has either directly or indirectly, pledged himself to
act upon. To a majority of the people the insnua-
ton of the Times would be rather recommendation
to President But it is evident the Times intended it
as a sarcasm innuendo only the insulting for
being enveoped in gauze veil thin that nybody
see through it. As such notice it of the innu
merabe indications in the Times and other leading British
journals of IA cordial desire cultivate the most friendly
relations with the United States 1t is certainly eff
ectual mode of demonstration to with denoun-
cling as demagogue occasion, and a poi-
cooperation those friendly relations be preserved
In fact the whole of this extract is little better than
torch dscod hcannot but be offensive to both the pa
triosm and pride of Americans to foreign journal
thus perpetually interfering not only with their foreign
policy but their domestic Institutions and schooling their
Chief Magistrate it WERE by hoping that now he is
the summit OF his ambition he will disengage himself
from those dangerous schemes which he has seemingly
committed himself that he will rise bis position and
administer the affairs of his country with frmness and
Judgment presume to please my Lord
and gain the good graces of his mistress The
gravity almost soemnity Of the Times in delivering these
homlies is somewhat ludcrous and have shrewd
picon the gentleman for whose special benefit they
tended will be tempted to laugh in his sleeve the wise
precepts of this second Solomon Perhaps future
occasion may show of the obligation BY
transmitting lecture to her Britannia Majesy-though
we hardly know what to find fault WITH since believe
she seldom oends by consulting the motions" OF the
jority Of the people Of England.
We must remarks the other article OF the
Times for future OCCASION columns too much
occupied to permit Of an extension of them Just now