Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-14

following causes VIII stand sor
he term:
JARY TERM, 1875
li53 Leteher ys Hudson;
i54 lowe vs.. sloan;
lla5 Moore vs.. Hughes;
1856 Merritt vs.. Benson et al:
l15I Shacklett VS.. Gilman;
l5s Stewart vs.. Eamoudson;
ll59 State Of Tenn use &c vs..
Bussell ct al;
160 Treadway q wife va
Goodwin admir-
it6l wallace vs.. Ackhn:
1862 Thompson tru. vs. Tenn,
AMI Ala. Railroad Co;
les Williams VS. Glover;
Il64 Beatty vs.. Cl0dfelter;
+ l65 TiIiman W Williams;
ll6-i Petvay VS.. Wilson ct al;
.67 Dunn vs. KreideT;
i68 Tenn. and Alt. Railroad
Co W. Marlin;
il69 Shute ". n 4 @ Railroad
! Co;
20 Ewing trustee Va same;
III n 4 c Railroad Co vs..
Donelson.
~ Lanier 4 Fails W. Vanlier
llT8 Livingston VS.. Nah Gas
/ Light Co;
MA Gilman W. Wright:
Il15 Lanier 4 MeNickle vs..
Yanlier,
iiTs Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
li77 Young vs.. Sumuerhln;
T5 Corporation Of Nashville
/ vs.. RsySord;
ftT9 Same vs.. Higgins;
lts0 Same v. Raiiord;
! 81 Same vs. Same;
| IS2 Same v Hamilton;
llsS GoH vs.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &C.
ss4 Cruichel vs.. Foster
SIS Childress vs.Mammele ct al
lIS5 Csntrsl VS.. Sloan;
| 1877 Doe. lessee, VS.. Waggo-
lis brigham vs. stratton ct al;
llS9 Same vs.. Crsighead;
| l9J Same vs. Havs et al;
lsl Bacchus W Porter;
10. Bosley VS.. Welch
4 SO Cole We. Mayor and Al
dermen Of Nashville:
i94 Davis vs.. Bradley;
i95 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
l96 Frazier, trustee, VS.. Hin
tUn;
9: Glover & Boyd, use &C
Va. 'Ollett.
9s Goldberg 4 Co. VS.. Insu-
rance Co.
i99 Harris vs.. Pitts;
I2uh Hays vs. Edmundson ct al
NJ Horn aud wife vs.Stewart;
p 2 Lellystt & Ewing vs.. Mills
4 kgan:
20S HoIlins VS.. Ryman ct a.;
2 { Hsllowell 4 Co. VS.. Hu e
205 Hammond & Co. W. Luz
cas- ct al;
3n6 Housley W.. HagRn et al;
OF Hoke 4 Bro. v, jackson;
2OS Hamwell vs.. Telegraph
Company:
l90e Johnson vs.. Nooie ct rl,
y v James 4 Co. vs.. OEen vt
el
I'll Insurance Company ".
Peck q al;
ne jenkins vs.. Bu.h ct al;
u 8 Kefby 70. Brockway;
- Lins' v W. Bridge Co;
2l5 Mckinney vs.. Shelly;
ZIG McCampbell, trustee vs..
Hicks ct al,
l9lT Same vs.. Mar;
liis Mc ,ntosh vs.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
I2t9 Nara vs. Insurance Co.;
~ Mlncy W. Turnpike Co.
III McGObeTts st al vs.. Jack
son;
l22 Oldham vs. Paul, ear;
% Petwsy ". Crutcher e. al
l2l4 Pope VS. Washington.
4th Week.
l225 Mining Company vs..
Mitchell ct al.
226 Murren Va. Ma,or and
Ald'mn Of NashVi le;
22I Minnelt 4 WincoOp vs..
McCOmbs ct al;
l22S Morgan 4 Co. VS.. Viek-
house;
229 Mills vs.. Stewart;
80 Matt n vs.. Beatty;
.23l Marren a MatIock vs.
Tenn 4 Ala. X x. Co;
i2S2 Owens VS. johnson;
i23S Porte fie'd vs.. Beasy;
l23t Stewart 4 Go. vs.. Hume;
l235 Same vs.. Bowlins;
236 samuels. BY next friend
VS.. Mayor 4 Aldermen Of
Nashville;
2 ! ShegoRg vs.. Simms;
23S Wright vs. Crenshaw;
2i9 z mmerman VS.. McNHiry;
240 Bank Of Tennessee vs..
liamI ton ct al;
24l Camuse vs.. Patterson;
242 State Of Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson ct al;
2 8 Bell vs.. WEIGH;
24I Guthrie and wife vs.
Rains;
45 Jordan vs.. Davidson;
246 Porter v. Bergan.
247 Livineston vs. Mayor and
Aldermen of Nashville;
24S Barns Ys. Gilman;
Z . Rains vs.. Williams;
80 Ihlldress vs.. Oven;
.5l Corporat on o: Nashville
vs.. Hamilton;
252 s me vs.. II ggins;
s'S Same vs.. Finn;
t34 Same vs.. BurnRnd;
/, 8 Balisntine W. Brown;
256 WooCfslk vs.. ". and g.
Railroad Co;
25I Mayor & Ali'men Nash
vile exparte,
25S Mayor 4 Al mn Of Nash
vile exparte;
$50 Odds vs. Mefadden;
200 Campbell vs.. Crenshaw
et al,
.2sl Corporation vs. Moore;
262 Morrison vs.. Graham;
s68 Same vs.. same,
- fame vs. same;
255 Same vs.. same;
26 Same ". same;
g. Same ". same;
6S PinktTton VI. Crensi av
ct al;
40 Suita 4 Co. W. Same;
2T0 Same ". SAM;
2Il same W. same;
az same ". SAM;
2TS Childress vs.. Hampton
et al;
2T4 Jones W. Nsnce;
rs Lgake ". ilaTell;
2T6 Frey ct al W. knight etal,
III jackson ". iiell;
2 s Dodd " Henry a Skinner
us Pope ys Washington,
80 same W same;
kSl Same vs SAME,
2Ss Peck 4 btss " Morton;
2s3 Pointer " Belt
1S4 Papiu " VOiEoi;
zs5 Peek " Carter et ell;
- Paris W Jackson
81 Sssy, trpstes " Tarpley
kPyls;
lSs shute W BivIey;
30 stevens W Hamilton ef Al
290 Shute " Hadsy st al:
k9l same vs. Williams tt ~
2s3 Van Dyke, adm'rts Pearl
ss3 6aldr0n W Scrnggs;
l9l Warmnth ~ Casey.
IS Whi,WoTth " scAiuny ct
al,
05 West ys BroEn;
i9T warren vs. Uni0a Bank;
.es AiioFd vs. Scales ex'r,
30 6leaves ef 81 ndm'r ys
Resell e a.
30n Same v Go0dlett rt Al;
81 Same ~ East et ri;
3 2 wis n W Carter
B 3 Whiiemsn W Carter:
30t LsnieF a tteNiekle "
ESing. Diek a Or;
THO. 7. sNILFy. r'~rt.
6 R&Eaa