The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-02-13
United States Supreme Court Decisions.
JUDGE cURTIs,s EDITION.

logue price of which saaa This sduan volumes,
whole. '''o' : v ~
From he Justices Of tho Supreme Coart Of the Und States
We approve the plan Decisions OF
supreme Court q The United States and believe that u. e1sen.n
BY MIN VII be 81 much utility 10 ihe legal profession and TO our
ROGER q. TAsEY, Chief Justice.
Jonn Mclean, M "a, AZ associate Justice
JOHN cArRon As.oeia.e Justice.
sasJI sasTEE \ slLsSN ass A.sss,.s jSs,ss
,. A. CAMPBELL, Associate Justice. -
The owins opnons expressed Of the work since
the publication Of The hIst three volumes; a.,
From the Chief Justice Of the United States
this publication useful valuable
thai have sed from the American have examined the as
dsnsn. aud eara The enaaees Of Mr. sdee Curtis i ." iss
sufficient that work Of this kind undertaken BY
cannot s ihu 10 me, the appreciation and Of The pub
s as wei a. Of s poesson whether pacAns in The courts Of the
IuLY 10, 1865 X. b. TANEY.
From Judge Mclean, Of tho United States Supreme Court.
have desired such edition of the reports s
where ,h drens havs BEEN a"bd mnaiaea % AZ
july IS, isss. " ''' '''' "' ''' JOHN MCLEAN.
From Judge Caron Of the United States Supreme Court
The specimen volume have me well edited and well
rsi one have no Doubt that Mr. Justice Guss edition viii
once supeeae all other reports Of Inc supreme Court decisions
dueng them form and size TO the student and com
Portable 10 the lawyer and the udge and then me Price
NASHVILLE, July 81, 1855.
From Jadys Grer, Of the United States Supreme Court
The plan Of this work has already received the sanction and APP
ns The promise OF ts able editor When fully executed will
others only by greatly reducing but by eliminating
s aas s ~ @ and ser MASS ss
veopsd aud coneeed The at The foo, Of each
aud will save much e and labor in searching through ~ sanged
PHiLApsLrAiA, Auguat u, le55. .Mn.m su-
From yadgc Daniel of the United States Supreme Court
Knowing learning ability of Judge cnus, with
that first made of his under
publication supreme Court upon
plan adopted by judging the of
his execution Of ha would conclude thai my most favorable
The of
& wn msn n s SeSun , be- % as aG o @ ev m
much vaIunhIe time. PETER v. DANIEL.
wAsnsoros, oc,oher !, 1855.
From the Attorney General Of the United States.
ATTORNEY GrnKRALs orucE,
September III, 1855.
GENTLEMEN: have compliance your request examined
Dscison. Of The supreme Coult the United ses BY
tee Cus and perceive that The work possesses peculiar quahes
l. 10 preservation whatever primary importance
BY secondary mater such editorial
sneu,an arguments COUNSEL
these essential the understanding calculation Of the
l. Ia the careful each case
aud the consequent correction Of such OF edish
Il the by other
drci.i ~ which 5 mentioned.
sbridgmelt, still
hat Of essential i'm of The natter itself by o In
derived the original records and files Of the
decomposition OF OF judcal
eIposions the syllabus Of each exhibits what really
adadge law and that alone passing obsr soa and
Judicial Argument -
prsns CONT des hereo beiaG either anquasd
defective ia plan and execution,
Of the work, serving
not only 70 render more accessible 70 The legal profession generally
holding place eolec
which honor and adorn the legal literature
OF the United States.
very respectfully, c. CUSHING.
MesEn LrrTLs, BRowS, b Co.
From Prot. PursoHs, Of The Cambridge Lao School.
Judge rendering profession a OF
within reach the these
be- the hfst examined, he this
D. NJ
applicable
In second volume OF Cranch (wbose
yolumnoss due than those his
sr But Judge Curtis retains
vsfyhiHr Coud who speak by MarhRl c.
put. compact form that IL s really much
opefanon of than In the original
be found bo literally In refer
these HIS condensation this
loose saves u, not only money, sn gms and labor -
LITTLE, BROWN, n Co,
Law and FnrsiTn Bookseller,
Jan 95-2aw5wR ia Washington ST., Boston.
of nv Fan