New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-04-07

dear s hs complaint in this that Bsesdssy w en-
t.ey es.iue'es By .Se~ dir .Hd e il IA s. eooditse
~, Gle hi be bed authority the bs-ass
po.ed uOn The head Of the department and the CONT
M ten 5sssG .tsenos to he se' .Ss q NJ Wood
% s q =, ss md &c s
ecueured IN the aloPted By
on The rs Of The substitute nosee in
ma he (Mr 5 eon,endet that IL fall aad
hs,or IN the II. the latter had d. vi.ed for
<rs Broadway OF the distractions which bad oesoned such
c noyanee In es Rs ssreed that be ha had
ee be che SUPPLEMENTARY dd not complain as TO the
matter Of ressestion he Nr. would TX; 70 anoE
junction sueA had been moved' Ii was
eeded that the ad'eement for proposal. had Seeo
whether the ell section OF the set of 49, ne
s ,eifh .eson Of Tie .s Of the .meH-d charter
sven shovel He did not Suppose that Les.'ure could
ebeo to .rp, s.t provision in the n breadth Of
besuse spilled, its application would lesd % very
.boui be established requiring considerable expeni
ure the Corporation Obliged 70 permit that out
for dsys advertise for ten days TOR pro
The COurt-There provision the Health Law of 1850
which enables the Mayor remove H.
Mr. put that Suppose another
suurow6eT Suppose be put in sueh posi-
ton lmpeI syeiy demanded Se should be remOysd
iDvolyins al expenditure OF over 8 80
The Court minated that the pubic safety we're
Law would also oIer-te in that instance.
Dir. She ard would suppose another cssethN some % the
sores vuns Broadway should f down aud block the
entirely obstruetins the OF czens &e-th-n
BY OF rubbish under contract founded
estsement OF ten days. this narrow construction
Of the amended Chsrtec should prevail
The thar the statute should be
suee sceordng the ordinary and current OF events lie
considered that Broadway be re ldsred abso
luel) rassabe that IL mu't remain 80 tor ten days The
intended 10 apply 10 a. the work done for sad all
ih 70 be funhed 10 tho Corporation, which IN their
work. Of necessity requns TO be done i1s
Cia'ely
Mayor 1.der tho ordinance OF 1854 when the eonuseneies
referred should had the To advertise fee
clean the streets tut at the same time te Mayor
conformity with the requirements OF
the am-ndstory ~ the charter 1851 much 40 ~ sny
oer The Court further observed
that the Legislature had ps intmated its viii Ia the
OF the weh section Of the Act OF 1873 that no
could possibly ersc thS Pro-
v.on. Ia feet The constitutional enactment 50 Tar
ihe citizens Of the City OF New ork concerned
urop score and b. airing Of the joint resolution OF 1854 and
the Of the Mayors compliance with the terms OF
the twelfth section OF the amended charter regards the atye
tisiIg 'or prorosas Sc-
The Judge took the papers And reserved his decision.
Judge Davies inmsted quite strongly la the cou - Of the
his opinion that the Mayor could hold the CORPORATION
One Tuttlc former bookkeeper OF the ST. Nicholas,
wa brought up a charge Of embezzng some toU rhe
postponed allow the introduction OF further at
c both sidts. .
NoTIcE.-Ohly ten viii be placed on the day
when they disposed Of thu Court will hear any
cs.e une.. counsel shall be actually engssed
wDl be specially down for day but not
ready called be passed The Court Will meet every
Day at 10 N By order of the Court