Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1856-05-27

I ed. The undersigned has tie borou
Enclosures TO this note, docuncp, t 20 Transmit =.
prove that both S'robe ami Her, ""cn sufir4ntly
thy OF credit. 1t IS mpUssble Tor b Wwho!y unwor-
e'ninea. ~ SCI the assertions OF such men gov
against the declaration OF Mr. men as these
unquestionable honor. The unJ,.Ip a"h-7e man Of
decd, remark that the whole prOc..,i;n Aust. in
,he .riai OF Hertz was OF such II nsurs ,ha 10
her Maesty minister and her Majesty con., "nli's
nn,cr,,rni were lhcu!pated by tn. evidennss" guy
unScrupu!"us Witnesses that minister anI ~ 4ehce ol
suiS ha1 not any means or any ,nnor,r,;, p'e con.
| uS 'hs charges which We're thu. iuciJs,,su,e ou''
| muIec'iy brought against them With re,srd; enc
vi scohsus at Cincinnati; Philadelphs and v Is'
t., ue! an equally deny the charges which ba''
ueeh Drought against them and thev dacI,ro nave
.'ey nave IN 10 way whatever ipfrn,,.d b. '"s.
sne Sh!ed States. With respect 10 Mr. Ron. sM
I've. .neJes'ys consul at Cincinnati the und.r.intS,
ias 70 observe TINT legal proceedings again., I.
nd a are SUI! pending. As To The origin chrsc,.
| m,,, t 'u'e o' those proceedings, the und.r,;,r.
,i'ght nave much to say; but "a they nro ara; sGeo
o "oslaih' from doing 50. H.. must, hnwsro.
permitted 10 remark that il would, al all sv..o "
Inconsistent with the PLANES; principles of insos
an1;'D az e'eaoi't7d' charges which are sill ,Ss
SUBJECT matter o Judicial Investigation 1'. Tue
ton against Mr. Mathew, her Mu;ss,r,a e ACCUSE
rhiiadeiphi" rests entirely upon ass.rinrs 81
te't@ iI"se assertions are positively o.p;.I b. ~!
Mathew; aud her M"jrsiys government can .ns ' N'.
ot.Ie.e 'H"' me government OF the Cnit-n ~!
"''" va" h"'"'tusc winch II will Dilys =.
the character nj Hertz will hesitate =, o"'"nelO!
tue government of her Majesty IN rivir, - WIKI
VT. Mdthcw. lt!I respect 10 Mr.. BarrIqy ,, " !
lcsty's consul at New York he scqrn, ,t. "e' Ma
t!Irf favored the alleged recr.i.ID, u- nu W. Ee
IN H. nor was informed N! the hiring. rs,s, 'p'ee
gagIng any man Tor that purpo-r H. " oT en-
government cannot bat accept III. I.rinl ''sJ.sys
gentlemen a. more worthy uf belief ,hsn ,t "'ess
lions ana evidence of such men as Hsr:z an, se''
bel But Mr. Marcy considers that the coniuc, y;
Mr. Barclay IN the affair OF the bark Maurv on,S
10 be M additional reason why her Mui-stv'. -"'
ment should recall him. Upon tbs the undersrn.t
must observe that Mr.. Barclay received informs
on oah from PERSONS ia the service oi the Cn,G s
STATES, leading 10 the belief thai the bark Maury w
httng Gat with designs hostile British Interest,". ma
Ut variance with the neutrality laws of the Unr.1 Z
aiates II was Dir. Barclays bounden duty 70 oornn,1
hcHte mat Inflammation without delay TO her MGj-svl
munster at Washington. Mr.. Barclay did so =, +.
his direct action III the matter was then al M .rI
Mr.. Champion submitted this Information 10 III. ~, |
por authorities 1f the United State. in ord-, ~.
they might determine what proceedings, ii CIV.
might be right 10 take thereupon. The otSr-;.; z
the United States considered the pJima cacv CA.
against the Maury to b. sufficient cali for pr,c,
ng5 on their part. Such proceedings were acco, u
nsiy Instituted by them, aud not by Mr.. B.rs.r q
whose conduct in regard 10 the Maury wa. in ,,rI Z
performance of hi- duty, and received the approval
II hvr Mnirsty's Government. With regard Ia tho ]
point, tho Undersigned must refer to the Offer, G
atIslactlon and 10 tho explanations already ms!. 4
nd 10 the repeated expression Ot the sincere reur
her Mno,tys government, il, contrary 10 their i'll
cIlions, and 10 Their reiterated directions there he'd
3en any infringement nt the laws of the Uni.j i
tates. The undersigned has now had the satsi.J z
on of communicating Ia III" government of the Uml .
I'll States the statements and declarations of her M q
.sty's Minister ut Washington, aud of her Mairs.y
'onsus AT Cincinnati, Philadelphia, aud New Yca 4
! 10 the conduct imputed To them. The goy-r q,
nv if.,l ha, h,..n Lot y, ~
nat the law aud the sovereign rights Of ths Jnfe IN
tates had not been respected by her Majesty sgo;st
lent, and relying upon evidence deemed TO te ,,
orthy, they believe, that that law and thu.e ris5,
al been inlringed by British agents. Ii such h!j
rcn ia: case the government OF the United S.'r.n
ouli have been entitled 10 demand and her N,ts X l.
y's government would not have hesitated 10 sfTL
most ample satisfaction, for discredi; can all
.ch To the frank admission aud complete -eparat!os
an unquesti"nab!e wrong. Her Mniee'yi eOvern.f b
lent however, uucquiyOcEily dsoain arr iUtcntioL5
her 10 infringe the law or to disregard the pol:yH d
not to respect the sovereign rights Of the ClizI -
,atcs, and the government Of the United States w
ow for the first time learn that her Maestys la,E
'r a' Washington, and her Majesty consu!s at y.r
"rk, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati, soemnly 4fr:H
lat they have not committed any Of the acts L.lt
ave been imputed TO them. The government Of Ia Ia
nited States will now also for the first time have LII
DportunIty of weighing the declarations of four g
elnen OF unmpeached honor and integrity assrE =.
'Idence upon which no reliance ought 10 be place 10
undersigned cannot but express the earnest olt
her Mnesty's government; that these eIpans,o,l Il
Id assurances may prove satisfactory the oIr.S Ri
ent CT the United States, and eeCtusy remove CI
comprehension which may have hitherto exi.reI
I'd hc cannot doubt that sGch result will afford Il
uch pleasure 20 the government Of the uui.J
ates as TO that Of her Majesty, by putting gu end al ~
difference which has been deeply regretted b. he'd -
Ajes:ye government; for there arc no two COuluesl
hich arc bound by stronger ties or by higher con.
,ra'ions than the United States aud Grca, Brts.DA
a;ntaa unbrokrI the relations OF perfect corLiA:l 8
ID friendship. The undersigned. SC.
CLARENDON.