New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-12-15

an ,ss, ur,sr qgty must prs all
r,,as Conn Of ire Uuitrd States In the Toe Uuion
baf Of C,or.sicwn vs. LARA wse.t Rep. ss and
~; - iseerpsrst sraeisa To. the q %. cap
h.i .roes 81 Any owned By Sy individual 'oetAOd,r
ssrSi,s 20 ,u.h r~s - may Be. e"nfc.sy to law essh
h cd n that behalf By ts- PRESIDENT 40 Directors -, ali
,.ou..rips Inn ,s-r mus, ,Sed BEFORE srch
H.e or.. the fsesF, s,s prs1 .aa n. Gs
form DECLARED thai the s.rr. -.se &c se
FsiIon lac Of .P, roet sanding !. b. ZANE o1
ne csT1Itca,t Of tevs. VI TIE s.Hs ~ sae
sh ofs.reh ISL he Bark eiseseE;es an s.sePancs o. Vat,
esFaTee IrOts,sS tSs ass pay .s. % ls .I R M
u Jss., ISL r.1 ,Ba I.Sa s ~.
fon ,ue 70 me ..a e. ~. !a.' - ISL, ., ,,,o,.
new md ,GtkorIiDs him TO tI.ns tie stct and tee
slL executed deed OF Asssnnen Of Ai' stock
80 reid up TO the Bank Patton ind~r. BY him
ri cam, IT tie Bsbk transfer Of toe hy 'esrss 20 hz
m. R.pi I..ed on ground tbsi The .rnsnt him
W., no, vsh being made the eooss Of the
BAH and ulon the ground That The er.srce wecA Patton
Esd JAILED pay or~srd lien in favor OF The B.ak
those ta,s ard refused suffer the transfer be made
ur FRAT psid Laird fled b. bill 70 compel the
dirtep, tie transfer b The supreme Court
the decree oi the Circuit ard direcn N e 70 be dl.n's
person ker,,re acquire legal iile TO shar-s
BAH and II any rerOn takes equitable Assignment it
be subject the hts o; the BsDk under the sc' c
such srcums,Anes, BE- held that the are
,pousible for The d.ess due the BsLk"
Ipgard Of St.bbns The rhenix FIR Insurance
Co IS Paige, ss1 equally point IN that Charles
No~ tepg the owner Of twenty .ha-s Of The capital STOCK
Of Jane. DO1sdson ton the purpose Of using bis
Mo.s .rT~ ard became largely indebted to the defendants.
nd ,,r ss-b ndreedne,. hsd sr'-d he procured blank
pw.r OF nton-y and assignment of 'ud from persOa
- the maze II D. rsdon delivered he TO the plain
III. pawn o. or security Tor debt which be owed the
az &C., nesnt. refused permit transfer the pats
hat they hsS lien on the ';o>k for the debt due to
bylaw the defendants passed in pursuance Of authority
b s nc. tt @ be yaa .n.. n 'ss. ono S
The eol. Of ne CcIPaISy Ias Cs.nSsSI ,sy' 10 reference
claim upon the stock BY way OF len Bot {. 70. 1eyr ids
Until such transfer take. piece purchaser with
claim hch may Kst AGAINST H. either 10 favor 81 the Com.
rspy CT any other p.r.OD When the equities equ. aud
upon the books Of the Company according
The he the PRO, equity must prevail
I'll. .,end claim Of the sb section Of the defendants act
Of incorporation dseUss that the Company has claim or
should not bv entitled msse transfer sale convesanee
OF receive dividend thereon uL uea e.m be
sd 10 their hen the stock and that could only
be directed bora 6de purchaser who tsd acquired title TO
Bc III. Sc csse are r.fred By judge Com.Oc in the
epon OF the CoSE, OF Asp lIsp' wA appreciation and
Lues could BE- acquired except By transfer made according
90 he requiem. aud that be .qaitshe M Of the
"r.e ~as sutjc all Iisl OF the Corporation .ssinst
We L.ve ~bss OF IN. Corpora.
% tb anti. were sssu.t Ian the s.sguov he
a. .ptf) has cquIed the gsl ute the sh,-s bu,
only .qube rights Of Lun.ius The ssssno those nights
i,b, therefore TO sell the shares Of standing
ib,ir iooL in the Of Lsu. and sppy the proceeds
In tine ,sw winch tshe OF this case, 10 stronger against
the either of the referred TO above .sd
that the ce'uhcate It's lace gave notice to the
pau, OF The ,h and claims OF the de'endsDs or ~ s.i
se should have put him on inquiry before he tool
ate this only contained the clause In.
The stock Was Transferable cny on me BOOK Q, me sn
in this e.p.c the csgse cites sooye but th TURNER very G
nfcIi de,lston that said STOCK wss s ersb. upon IN,
"eor dit sute the Restrictions contained IN n'
"sr,cles Of association Of said Bank
Wa not bi. full ard snpl. Doce 10 all receiving such GER
tfceir tb transfer gu ect 10 conditions and estc,
tion. cop,sned in the article. Of association aud world aud
could be- see unt.s to-y see complied WITH Ahf
those eondiiops and he, b Sfnsact. refs.e 20 nnssr
H. .,ok until conditions and be complied
with Ttey mad" TER thr projections me STOCK was
lion and ~ party receiving Tor the
of he de, security and taey gave notice all TIE
world thai the could be ar.ered and sd title made
10 olv by trsnsie thr books and then BY comp,ancs
with I'd, restrictions contained /. the articles Of
am satisfied tbs, the defendants have the right to in
upon udusnt Of those 'oodt'sn' and re.e,on, and
psys up def bdan. the indebtedness OF Bic s'snor "a
hem for - bch they have hen on this stock.
\ be cor plant must b. dismissed, with costs
THE GREAT FRENCH RAILROAD FRAUD
ALL The PRisosEEs HELD, But MADAME DEBuD
AND EUGBSE GRELET.
The northern Railway Company Of France ssan, Charles Car
Isr Ter Louis Orelei Eugene Grret Ausnste Psfot fece
b. bud and CusniD. go q,
The plant this sets out two distn t and
,e,srs. "a. Of seton The first IT, b.t the patd being
an in, operation created BY the laws OF the empire OF Faoc~
doing business herein baa in then emp. on or about the
LEI The former rss~ sn1 the latter uodeseshirr that
steel end other valuable bn,s beonsns the plaintiff
deposited with them that the ssid Crp-nter and oreet
While :. as., ,pss from the sal. % ..d
plaintiff sod and converted to their ewn 10. az shares
n dplan
a mh IN, ia smps Of rrnes and aed % the United
about The bupdred dollar and the PLAINTIFF claim
By q !. n p. .S S o % o. ana ap~.d: AID
further setoD the plaintiffs aese hat the said Car
liar, e.p.sy With aid assistance Of the other defeat
snis Az lusy smbe The aid 71 shares Of 'tch .od
III attached and do npusly de- ain the same and did
rmove ard dspose thereof that the cAnno, be
.1 orsln ard did The said act. with me intent wa, ,ss
. ri,e tie plaintiffs q the benefit thereof Upon ahfsy
..ime TACT. an order Of arrest was mad n
Of oil The dsndar. and by virtue Of shsy h.vs beer
arstsS and held To- hail In the sum Of $rvD eace er
CIT the n o H. vino o' nv ss o,. sos
sln Fspce. ion IL now made ny the drendAnts
i;t 81, ar ne a1. S hat e' proc
M .si s.. 'Jh I'D no, ssss 1s ssf moos
a Recorder Tou and Jno Mckeon United States District
parIr. The m"iion been most eIsbor.e
an ably aTguee and the magnitude Of the amount asosJ
iss, m. 10 very careful considers ion Of the e.se aud
more critical examination Of the numerous .othonIe' eed
than IL a, usl In Of his Character motion has mere
,r. t., made 'b. T the disehasr Of tho
F.te p.bsd the ground hist enc being t.ss ooao no,
b. the stained OF lh Couft nel1 on
arr the facts showed thst the scts of
we've will property and such ~ annofzed ,ne AZ
rest OF emsle under Sob Of 7s OF tue code nov
eoI Oh behalf Of the detndsnts mabn this mott m
,h. he hsve dsmsee BY their aga and
,ks th.r.foe 4 .ep eIis's azsnr them Ids
fuusn eedes the ruth 81 the al eeon ~ ae complain
Sui Of sec 7e Of the dsca that the defendant
be action for the recovery Of damages Tar ~fons
fully taking deninE or converting property SUB OF SAM
secin the Of ~ IN an action tor proper
~ ,nb.1a isHdulsnily msapped By one ON er OF
corporation In the VI his employment az
,eeb on BY any other scnns 10 hfueaAy
capacity. By THE Osupent the dsf-ndsnts sfrn. the
,,fb. md alleged ia toe coDptAint
,no lie Louis GrI simirs thai while sc'ns 10