The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-26
In Equity. No. IIhI.

In s bin originally flied n This JobB Gray com
panan bun was aefwad by leave Of The court made defend
The substance Of the original amended and supplem bills
On or about The dfst OF sep,ember isia
Of California 10 Jusio Laro Of
he Jurisdiction san Jose Guadalupe Tipped California and
known The Rancho de os Caplancios BY which gaat
boundaries speced hercn assigns and ih
ing grant required in order 10 Complete Inc
e thereby passing as aforesaid SAID Laro sold said
1885, and ecorded Said Cook aloda owner
April ls4s copy an exhibit in this euuDo con-
yeyed 20 one knowles Taylor and the defendant John Gray
their heirs and assigns ~ The
o and two dhs 10 said Gray tbs mat neludng one en
pany, which last said Larkin ware
minerals and ores then known which fourd
last together with the gh Of water
grazing o a cattle horses aud mules belonging
Gay which needed for carrying mines also and sui
heien for establishing smsIns works. building houses all
nnes and together with estate rgh ie Interest proper
COOK @ w DC @ o a. es
and accidentally omitted The enision supplied
cuied and duly recorded the 9h March, s49 but which,
conncyancc o have been dated on the Ist April, lsis
The sS@psnsn, and .e dssndan, Cray
2 Of March 1880 between said Taylor city
the State Of Virginia. NJ his wife, of The one part and the
saa e aa o a
Tbs declaration Of trust states that lands
sss,n IN Se Sensns ss Of
@s oa as Ss s ,sS s
Gray in this suit il states
e he %ns %aera nas i.aS aaS
Sasna sSe and e a a a Tt %
In The name Of Taylor and
ais, and and each party ownership should
s m @ sas sS PSo orr" By
respective WIVES 10 the compainan Taylor
things which R eeiied bad
o an9 and e same 10 be held BY soman
ug % ana m ~ % "s, SET io' 10 said sessra,on Of trust,
Taylor and said Gray s Sc
said Taylor and Gray same for the use and ben
e o. ne pa.es Interested total of four bun shares
qI as,v ss y q 5onn /, ? dssy s,astor
object OF he aaa S DiIe % BE- ay s
proper manage ment Of The said estate, mines
1--WE the whole business Of the by
appoint sgen, in the manas. men Of h
=. 70 &c hxd by themselves The relative
ed IN said property have changed
Knowles Taylor died about ,he month o October
Sa ana the duty Of carrying The of
chase rom Grove q Cook wife person John
who Yors Pfe yousy 10 said purchase neit-
1 s9%panan pa1 nor he feels quite certain ionn D. Cray
hat any other purchase. by
he departure of said Gray California; reached
ias hsngd "a 9, who was agent o Knowles Taylor also
said ransho eu, IN inquiries said Jane.
NOR Virgins had an s .ad aScho any n hs s
uaon bsore convey
the progress. said Wissn. was cosazaa Of he same
period Jsm.s rsneid tha, he 6nd s
.e rancho with Cook and that he looked Cook alone
ing long and part
clam to the properly wad be- e up s aa
o% a Cook to Taylor and Gray aud James Bane,d Tao conn
cry and in instance, in,ued his the
and Others him. prevailed Cook by
and BY drawing him habits Of dissipation m he be
,s !. which ms wife onsd TO wiegn. his ngt in
gins, together with his counsel, OF James
Jones' as parties hled bin OF complaint in the district court
Clara alleging that Virgins purchased
ss.even,. Tor wns B"t ssd u@s %ese respeeysy p" ~
Them .a Lsro made The deed Cook aoue that was agreed
name IN trust for Virgins sreyenIhs that the "a Of
menoned that Taylor Gray Cook
only one seventh Of The property and Virgin. owned The rede
e deed from Cook % ihem void TIC petouen that
took possession property continued the
s,.on Of sih The knowedse of Tao. and Gray sl ,he
one undivided eighth Of te mins minerals aud Other things de
prayed fot decree nnnuns the deed Taylor and Cray TO
q the anso that Taylor and g 6sy S compelled re
swer s b fo responsive 10 H. snd generally and specially
coos 70 Taylor an Cray oftbe inss minerals" Ores. sc IN as
saSso jSnn Gray putt an answer responsive le aver
mentioned March, 1881, agreement of
States California, demanded
BY John II. by Of the
STATES district distct CALIFORNIA;
es out ~ This h that the llth November 1854 made The
following decree;
United Disrit oo,uo the Northern District Of California
WIaotss, WELLEH, and JoNEs,
r.,,o, 81 e,r Final Decree,
Th. coming heard the stipulation of parties by
er respective solicitors, die, the bill and exhibits
e,e'O appended and ae hearing aa%en, Of counsel or
forth In the said duty verified by oath, and
hereby duly suanrd and that said
several conyoyanees and contracts Of lease set forth IN said anw
hersby certified confirmed the said
panans And further orderod ndudged and deereed that
Cook and John Gray Tsyler
forth in said and the hereby confirmed forever
be passed then ee from al claim behalf Of sad
painants whatsoever
forth said OF 2s oI March A. ~ 1850
hy the said John Gray he WIFE and the sad Knowles
s,ockton ohn Macy Lewis Levin, and james Bainrd
o The said grantees became porssed Of the ssvnl rights
trusts whatsoever pau companan,s either ofhon
and that they have fu perfect and valid subng title TO the snd
Aud further ordered, sdjpdged dccreed that the
yeyanco forth in said Grove Cook 20 Jose
Company, bearing January, lsie bo, the
n hereby confirmed eganst the said compsinants free from AL
claims Of the said ompanani either Of them by way Of trust
or otherwise
And ordered adIudred and dcceed the lease So
assocafe bearing day January, Is be- and The
!, hereby confirmed from M cisims Of the snid com
ordered adudecd decrced, tina, the convey
ances sci forth In said from John Christie and om said
hhrero SAID John o. Christie as Their
attorney, John n and wife, date the 2d day
Of December is,s and the hereby, confirmed against
he said copPanant- free from n claim OF the said complainant
or either Of ihern, by Of trust or otherwise.
And Is further ordered, adudred and deceed that ne convey
fob said from Juso Lsro TO .ad Grove q
Cook september ef5 and the deed from jose A
nocru he