The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-02-28

II you psss not this bill we shall throw up commissions
and che eounry without government IN inc very
crisis foega Thus and only thus they succeed
"a IL bullying the House OF Commons into Their
End pushed The bill through against the better luoS
Of many and me o. honor Of The whole Dooy
MI President Ia reading lhe epo,. q ss ana or
members entreasd ministers to say how ana ncre they
expee ID obtain foreign troops as the ministers were
ire uenty aainonished that II against all principle for
British government TO undertake to enter within the
limits OF foreign Stale for the purpose Of raising recruits
State consent il would be violation OF its neutrality
that fit did consent then It's neutrality would be yio
lated sud outraged by Great Ban aud one member put
bis objection the following language am sstonished
that against ala these circumstances the bill passed
% s n ssa es ai a Be- or %
country for The purpose q making war WIN Musss and ss
for by sostssn be asserted that was dangerous pru
oiploto lay down. 4 this we're the principle Of the bill
uuted staey Should they told that any country
ray and that W. Ind oar.eses laid down hat praep
by deliberate ACT Of the British Paramentp
Ii was in the face Of Mr. Marcys solem. assurance to
Mr. Champion Of the 2Sth Of April 1854, and to the adj
House 81 Commons that Lord Pamerson having procured
il out IN the United States Of course the law Officers Of
the United States opposed il We all well remember the
The enlistment Of recruits or the British service produced
during last in Boston New York, and Philadsi
business conducted by Sir Gaspard lie Marchan the
British governor Of Nova Scotia yet in fact II
Mr. Champion, the British minister at washington The
President has Of course demanded Of the British govern
ment ample reparation for this outrage against the
erign,y and neutral rights ofthe United States He would
have dhonored his station and bis country had he omit
ted to do so. applaud him myself believe all APP
plaud himand every American applaud him for his
course 70 put stop 10 the business Of British enistments
in our land which is dstnguishabe in principle from
m2rssment the which not less sternly rebuked
by Jefferson and Madison.
Sir the Earl Of Clarendon in the speech recently
by him at the opening Of Parliament undertook to state
90 positions which require to be met by an entire contra
dicton at in the only place where that contradiction
be clothed with authorityin the Senate Of the United
NJ. States
a l. Lord Clarendon assumes to Justify the acts OF Mr.
Champion, and, in relation to Them says he has done
nothing which should give umbrage to the United States
nay, that what he did satisfactory to Mr. Marcy.
take 1t for granted sir that when the de-
spaches we shall find that this imposition Mr.. Marcy
will be totally destitute Of foundation. Instead Of being
satisfied in having the British recruiting service prosecuted
An the United States he had, nave than
year before solsmnly notified The British that
u should not be done. As TO the participation Of Mr.
CHAMPION in the business ii is absolutely astonishing that
any should utter word IN It's Justification
it was VIGOROUSLY with the rights Of neutrality
M and national honor Mr. President have learned from
numerous original letters from Mr. Champion and The
British officers with whom he coresponded subect
to nothing of his official instructions British consuls
and other persons on file in the Department of State
that which proves fully the scanaalous activity of Mr.
Champion in the commission of those acts by which
rights and our municipal laws neutral power
q But Lord clarendon, in ais second speech, declares
that our laws were not violated by Mr. Champion 1t is
somewhat astonishing that Lord Clarendon should have
ven,ured such declarations and il becomes s,l more
50 when perceive that he relies for this opinion
mark made by Judge Kane in the month of April at
early stage of the proceedings the that il did
not constitute violation of the law for gcrernmen,
ms's{ Eoa
very earea TO forget to state that when the
to be tried in New York and Philadelphia September
before Judges lngerso and Kane these honorable Judges
charged IN the mort explicit terms that the proved
We're ~ violation Of law and moreover that the proofs
ton with them In order that Lord Clarendon or any one
else in Great Britain, may not hereafter have any
FOUNDED on ignorance OF this matte quote the following
passage from the opinion of Judge Kane:
sr The sas sss ny nassi i it, q facts
eransres aspect Of it than IN its bearing or the
Questions which are to be decided BY your verdict There
a ss press ~h q met @
q 9is bs.s f ts az,
ss1 pTops s T. g e ga
have been Of svnr
s osga,,on Of 9eu.rslity and pushing ourselves forward
fS ., bs.asss asu'ri and leaving bsgo.sn dsS
advanced 70 learn hst curing sss ,s s %
ess sensations were iamnsted against peo
B here .s Of .1a ps,s =, s~
ps usdsr osLsa Ssesd and Combining all Of peo
the United States BY which our country to enforce
lion Of the different o upon careful
eae ee,r spr and principle without incurrns their pen
shores 20 sht battles Of those who were incopnen,S
aaa na over courteousy sdmonhing fulfil duties
THE hiring retaining doe. necessarily include the
u
ahober lie may hire retain person with an agree
ment that he shall pay when the
peen performed The hiring retaining servant not
generally ey the payment OF money, 10 the
put py tie promise 70 services shall
nave oeen performed and SO person be hired
tanned to beyond .he limits OF United States with
certain intent though he Ia only receive his
beyond the limits Of the States with that in
tent. " 1900 w." ' :"
aoreoysr nece ssry tina, the consideration Of
ny n'ihg snAi be money. To give to person rsroad
ns costs four dollars, and board and lodge him
as good consideration for the contract Of hiring
30 Pay ann The money with which he cnud buy the
osetend pay for his board himself IL engage
% on The one side 10 do the thing
Tue mits or the United States with enlist and
on toe other side that, when
nave been done, consideration shall be paid party
performing the services doing the work. hiring and
retaining are complete.
The mesning II the law, them "a thu that any person
shall engage he, retain employ another person
oaisds Of the United States be could not
do he remaned In the United States part In
lorefn quarrel f he hires another knowing that
hm intent TO enlist when be strives ~ he engages him
20 w oecsuse be has such intent then the offence
pee within The sectDn Every resident United Slater
mas the right 70 20 to Halifax, snd there enlist IN
army that be pease-, but " II lawful for
Rsee another here 10 10 Iaifsr for that purpose
the hing OF The PERSON beyond the United States
person having the intention srrives out
ana that intention known the rarity hiring him. and
n of the