Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-07

NDAfA " uifiuc tue hONACA ~
70 newspapers Of general cir
among the first, second, third,
e parties in such causes may
ance will be required
ore be the duty Of he Clerk in
ssses to summon them to at
rd or fourth Monday Of the
he eau e stands on the docket.
causes viii stand for
le term:
AIRY TERM, 1875.
ia3 Letcher vs., Hudson;
l54 Lowe VS.. Slsan;
l55 Moore VS.. Hughes;
.l56 Merritt vs.. Benson ct al;
ISL shseklett ". Gilman;
.159 Stewart Ys. Edmondson;
i59 State OF Tenn use &c VS..
russell ct al;
100 Treadway 4 wife VI.
Goodwin admir-,
ISL Wallace vs.. Ackhn;
l62 Thompson tTus. VI, Tenn.
and Ala. Railroad Co;
l63 Williams vs. Glover,
164 Beatty VS.. Clodfelter;
l65 Tillman vs. Williams;
1915 Petway rs. Wilson et al;
1877 Dunn vs. Kreider;
l68 Tenn. aud Ala. Railroad
Co. vs.. Marlin;
1863 Shute VS.. " 4 G Railroad
Co;
no Ewing trustee vs.. same;
III N & @ Railroad Co vs..
Donelson.
lT2 Lanier 4 Falls vs.. Vanlier
lI3 Livingston vs.. Nash, Gas
Light Co;
ia Gilman vs.. Wright;
l75 Lsnier 4 McNickle vs..
Vanlier;
lI6 Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
III Young VS.. Summerhlll;
rs Corporation Of Nashville
vs.. Rayford;
1I9 Same vs.. Higgins;
$50 Same ". Railord;
isi Same vs Same;
1872 Same ". Hamilton;
lS3 Gof vs. Stevenson presi-
dent, &c.
1S4 Crutchei vs.. Foster:
1856 ChiIdress vs. .Mammel ct al
lS6 Cantrel VI. Sloan;
1ST Doe. lessee, vs.. Waggo-
1853 brigham vs. stratton ct al;
Is9 Same vs.. Crsighead;
100 same vs. Hays ct al;
t9l Baechus vs.. Porter;
10! Bosley vs.. WEIGH
1873 Cole VS.. Mayor aud Al
dermeu OF Nashville;
1914 Davis VS.. Bradley;
1876 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee, vs.. Hin
ton;
81 Glover 4 Boyd, use &C
vs.. Collett;
i9s Goldberg & Co. W. lns1-
rance Co.
l99 Harris VS.. Pitts;
200 Hays vs. Edmundson ct al
l01 Horn and wife vs.Stewart;
2 2 LeIlyett 4 Ewing vs. Mills
4 Egan;
303 HOilins vs.. Ryman ct al;
2a4 Hallowell & Co. VS.. Hume
205 Hammond 4 Co. VS.. Luz
cas- ct al;
206 Housley We. Hsgsn ct al;
207 Hoke L Bro. VS.. Jackson;
2US HamEell vs.. Telegraph
Company:
909 Johnson vs.. NoOTe ct al;
? 0 James & Co. VS.. owen ct
al
IL Insurance Company W.
Peck Il 81;
lie Jenkins vs.. Bush et al;
5i3 Kerby vs.. Brockway;
IL Linsvy vs.. Bridge Co.;
2i5 Mckinney ys Shelly;
2l6 McCempbell, trustee vs..
Hicks ct al;
2iI Same VS.. Mari;
2lS Mcintosh vs. Mayor and
Aldermen;
2l9 Nara vs.. Insurance Co.;
g20 Mslloy vs.. Turnpike Co.
III McRoberts ct al VS.. Jack
sou;
300 Oldham VS., Pau. ex'r;
90 Petway VS.. Crutcher et al.
ga Pope vs.. Washington.
Attn Week.
225 Mining Company VS..
Mitchell ct al.
22G Murrell VS.. Mavor and
Ald'mn Of Nashville;
227 Minnett 4 WincoOp vs..
McCombs ct al;
l2S Morgan 4 Co. VS.. Vick-
house;
229 Mills VS.. Stewart;
$50 Mart n VS.. Beatty;
28i Murrell a Matlock vs..
Tenn. 4 Ala. K X. Co;
239 Owens vs. johnson;
233 PorteTfield vs.. Beatty;
234 Stewart & Co. vs.. Hume;
235 Same vs.. Bowling;
236 Samueis, by next friend.
VS.. Mayor 4 Aldermea Of
Nashville;
231 Shegogg vs.. Simms:
2S3 Wright vs.. Urenshaw;
239 Zimmerman vs.. McHairy;
Z4O Bank OF Tennessee vs..
Hampton ct al;
24l Camuse VS.. Patterson;
242 State Of Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson ct al;
3 3 Bell vs.. WEIGH;
RAJ Guthrie and wife vs..
Rains;
}45 Jordan vs.. Davidson;
246 Porter ". Bergnn:
24I Livingston W Mayor and
Aldermen Of Nashville;
24S Barns rs. Gilman;
: ~ Rains VS.. Williams; /
80 Childress vs.. Owen;
,5l C0rporSt on OF Nashville
vs.. Hamilton; I
S52 Same vs.. II ggins; /
1913 Same vs.. Finn;
~ Same vs.. GDrnand;
? ) Ballentipe vs.. Brown;
l56 WOodfJlk vs.. n. and G. !
Railroad Co; I
,57 Mayor 4 Ald'men Nash |
vile exparte;
l5S Mayor 4 Al 'mn Of Nash |
vile e1parte;
l59 0lds vs.. Mcfadden;
200 Campbell vs.. Crenshaw |
ct al;
5ei Corporation ". Moore;
l62 Morrison VS.. Graham;
lb8 same vs.. same;
l64 Same vs.. same;
1S5 Same vs.. same;
s6i Same vs.. ssms;
'67 Same ". sane; I
,6S Pinkerton We. UrenshaW (
ei al;
lf9 Smith 4 Go. ~. Same;
go Same vs.. same; |
lIl Same vs.. same;
sT2 fame ". same;
lIS Childress W. Hampton
ct al;
30 Jones vs. Nance;
rs Leake W. HarelI;
,7s Frey ct N W. Knight etal; |
III Jackson ". Bel;
Us Dodd vs. Henry a Skinner
~ Pope vs. Washington;
's0 same " same; |
~ Same vs. same; 1
80 Peck 4 Bliss ys Morton;
80 Pointer vs. Bell;
50 Papin " Voizoi;
50 Peck vs. Carter et sl;
's5 Paris vs. Jackson
81 Sesy, trusles vs. farpiey
4 Pyle;
IS shute " Bigiey;
SO stevens vs hamilton et al
30 Shute " Hadiey ct sl;
81 same W. Williams et al;
90 Van Dyke, adm'rvs Pearl
80 waldron vs. scraggs;
90 Warmoth W Casey;
95 MhilwoTth W Sealuny et
al;
90 Wes' Va Brown;
81 Warren " Unian Bsns;
9S AlIord ~ Scales ex'r,
80 Gscaves et al admir- W
Resell e a.;
00 same " Goodls.t ct a;
ill Same W East et nj;
~ Wilson " Carter;
20 Whiteman " Carter.
0t Lanier & AeNickie W
Ewing, Dick 4 Ce;
THO. T. SMILEY. Clerk.
for 1856!
G o u AN s.,
l07 Nassau st N. YORK