Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-02
CASES AT JANUARY TERM, 1873

telu on tie Ufcis -tCOluY "
Term, according to the place
Under he above Rules the
trial during the drst week o.
CASES AT JAN
1sI Week
| Den lessee vs.. MallOy;
. s ay vs.. Cameron;
3 Morrow vs.. Napier;
4 Sranficld rs. same;
8 Pointer vs.. SAME;
6 Flowers rs. same;
I kirkman vs.. same;
s Travis vs.. Wallace;
Q Lawrence vs.. Nashville
II llsbOro' Turnpike Co;
10 : clby vs.. Martin;
IL ; me vs.. Wetmore;
~ Winston vs.. z eds;
Is Walker vs. Ba e.;
IL Mayor and Aldermen Q
Nashvillr eNparte;
Is Young vs.. Corbett;
I6 Doe lessee vs.. Ray;
II GJRdey use &C. vs.. Mar
shall;
IS same vs. same;
Q baldwin vs.. ElliOtt;
2 NJ 'sley ". Gi liam;
~ Brink ey vs. McD0le;
% York 4 Co vs.. McKenni'
% McCsmB;aeii IS. Bell;
~ same VS. Bel & klbardS:
p Doe lessee vs.. McEwen;
% Jasper ct al W. Barns;
"a Law horn vs.. Davis;
% Sloan vs.. Haskell;
- MEG Givock vs.. Gilman
81 McGavOck & Co vs.. SAN,
81 jones vs.. Mitchell;
81 Mayor ami Aldermen ,
Nash HE eXparte;
So State Of Tennessee US
&C vs.. smell et al;
"a McCampbell vs.. Clemon-
80 JaCkSou's EX'rs vs.. Gil
bert 4 son;
Sc Charlotte Turnpike Co "
Spence;
81 Cross ". Green ct al;
IS Evans & Smith vs. Shiver
'et al;
50 Forehand &C VS.. Farrell
40 Chi,cutt vs.. Mcintyre;
. Martin vs.. Armstrong;
42 Cruns vs.. James;
IS Charlotte Turnpike Co v:
Spence;
Al FAY vs.. Sloan:
40 Ayrcs d Matthews W. G !
bert;
'6 Hyde vs.. Maddox;
AZ Da,is vs. Moseley;
IS Charlotte Turnpike Co.
VS.. spence;
20 Hughes W. Gilbert;
- Alien vs.. GOoJrich;
81 Frazier " Steamboat To
ledO and owners,
~ Goldberg vs.. Hinton;
5} Harris vs.. Smiley ex'r;
81 B tnE II Teuues e. vs.
Greene et al,
s. Mckee admir- vs.. Noel.
IS SaUe vs.. Same;
81 Bank Of Tennessee "
Newsom,
IS McGavock vs. Paul ct al
% same vs.. Tucker ct a.;
2d eek.
60 wilson Px'rx vs.. Goo wi
e. al;
81 Johnson vs.. Radcliffe;
G2 same ys. OrtOn ct al;
3 ManlGsctmi & CompRn.
v Hnbns = ilenly;
f4 Lowry vs.. Dubbs;
g. Adelphi Theatre Co v:
Greene;
sc Harrison & Richardson v,
Boiling a Straiton;
81 De La Nergne vs.. Dodge
IS Martin VS.. Ensley;
% Williams \ llitchIngs V.
Glover a Boyd;
~ Hell vs.. Davis;
II L x \ Railroad Co VI
n. 0. Love;
y same vs.. Walker;
- same rs Gee;
- same vs.. NayuOr;
- $ me vs.. Sledge;
76 Martin vs.. FuSsell 1t al;
- McEwen, use &C vs. AlUT
ton ct a ;
Is Watkins vs.. Barns;
~ Nance VS.. Moore ct al;
~ Pa quett vs. Austin;
; Sleyog VS.. Roberts, adj
50 Sloan eN'rX vs.. Halle;
- Carl ichael ". King et a
81 Halt Y vs.. WetuOre;
% Wilkinson, ct Al vs.. Clin
ard;
Sc Eatherly vs. Ninson;
81 Morse 4 Son W. uess;
IS Nash & Char Turnpik
vs.. Sprnee;
50 Bell trus ee vs.. NJ Donal
a. Bell trust, e vs.. Samusii
81 state Of Tenn, Use, &c
VS.. Dodd;
q D0tson adm'r &C vs. Dabh
9'i SIN ley v. Den oss adm
- Childte,s vs.. jackson;
O. Gteer vs.. Jordan:
~ Hlumer VS. Carroll, ag't;
% Ameut vs.. TaylOf;
- DrLahay vs.. Lawrence;
90 Cunningham vs. M'Comb
& Coz neliu,
no Mclaughlin vs.. kimhro;
lOl French vs.. Duncan, Nor
gan q Co;
1o2 Lowe admir- vs. sloan;
lrS Ial Tor vs.. 5 Boat Bsaut.
et al,
"a Gilman vs.. Kimbro,
l01 hatthrwson vs. Philips,
6 Kin,bto vs.. Watson;
lpI Steel s. l. A K X Co;
tuS Buchanan vs.. Joseph;
lt9 VI tney trustee vs. Bgley
ITO Demoss admir- VS.. Russ
ct ai;
Ill Scales vs.. Tenn. and Ala
Railroad Co,
ll2 loOney Us. GrizzaId;
liS burger vs.. BrieD;
IA Austin vs.. liza =;
| 8 Bland vs.. Boiling;
Ii6 nnyd VI. " oodwarlet I nj
III B's Of Tenn vs. ucNair.
st al
us Bells eX'r vs.. Blk OF Ten
lty rank Of tennessee VI
Mclaughlin,
l20 Jatksou vs. Bell;
III An hnny, ir,, " jackson
lZ2 Le,ch vs.. Pointer u.e &C
W. Bell;
l23 nakrr vs.. Jackson.
Ia Buwen ct al W steven
son et al,
les BruE on et 81 W. ilick
man ct al.
l2G Bank, Planters vs.. Hpd
son,
i2T noitnn ct al vs.. Rimbro.
rs Berry, use &C. W. Foster
admin
10 Carte vs.. Hamilton et al
$50 Chidress vs.lohnsO et
~ Same vs.. Dock Jones ct a
l32 same W. jackson et al;
I 3 same vs Owen e ~;
1874 Coiluis W. Gregory;
la5 COlsst stns vs.. MOuniE
ls6 Cartwr ght ". Smell et al
ISL IhAvOas vs.. Dickinson e
al.
rs Douglass W. Turnpike Co
toJ bleary hs Manufacturing
Company;
40 remoss vs.. Bel;
IA Ffnniug v. Bartlett;
I42 fTIng vs.. zimmerman eI
IL.
I43 Farris vs.. Hundley;
ia losteT, trustee vs. MC
Marry;
lfS Goodwin W. Paul e. al
lac Grri nhrld a Co. vs. Mar.
uhctnring Company:
l4f Gleavss q Al Va. Jack on
&c al;
l4' Gray ". Holt, agent;
lf9 Glover " Telegraph Co.
I'd Week.
I5u Chi.iress ys. haror 4 Al
d-rmrn ~ Naahville;
81 Driver vs. Hiiclings;
I52 Ham vs. Wal Powers;