Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-10
CASES AT JANUARY TERM, 1875


he eau e stands on the docket,
following causes will stand for
he term:
JARY TERM, 1875
li5S Letcher W Hudson;
li54 Lowe ". Slssn;
la5 Moore vs.. Hughes;
Il56 Merritt VS.. benson ei 81:
ll57 Shacklett vs.. Gilman;
il5S Stewart VS.. EdmOndson;
lt53 State OF Tenn use &C vs..
RUSSELL ct al;
leo Treadvay / wife W.
h Goodwin admir-
ISL Wallace vs.. Ackfn.
l62 Thompson tTu.. W Tenn.
AMI Ala. Railroad Co;
1888 Williams W.. Glover;
l64 Beatty vs.. ClOdfelteF;
+ l65 Tillman vs. Williams:
49, PetWay W. Wilson ct al;
.67 Dunn vs.. KreideT:
iG9 Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
Co W. Marlin;
i69 Shute vs.. N h c Railroad
Co;
no Ewing trustee W. same;
III n & Z Railroad Co W.
Donelson.
tT2 Lanier 4 Fails W. vaniier
lib Livingston VS.. Nah. Gas
Light Co;
.i74 Gilman VS.. Wright:
us Lanier 4 MeNickle vs..
VAnlier;
IlIs Halle & Cows. Bridge Co.
ii5I Young vs.. Summerhlll;
Is Corporation Of Nashville
vs. Rayford;
3tT9 Same vs.. Higgins;
fSa same ' Raiford;
I 81 Saa-e W Same;
I iS2 Same v llamilon;
Z liS3 Gof vs.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &c.
'e4 Cru'chei vs.. Foster
I SIS Child ess vs.Mammel ct al
lIS6 Cantr vs.. Sloan;
ISL Doe. lessee, vs.. Waggo-
Il>S brigham vs. 'trattoR ct al;
Ils9 Same vs.. Craighead;
81 Same vs. Havs ct al;
/ lpl BAcehus vs. Porter;
10 Boslry vs.. WEIGH
93 Co e vs.. Mayor and Al
dermen a Nashville:
l94 Davis W.. Bradley:
l95 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
l96 Frazier, trustee, VS.. Hin
tn;
9. Glover 4 Boyd, use Sc
vs.. Ollett,
90 Goldberg L 60. vs.. Insu-
rance Co.
80 Harris vs.. Pitts;
I2,H Hays VS. EsinundsOn et al
II Horn and wife vs.Stewart;
p 2 Leilyttt 4 Ewing vs.. Mills
4 Egan.
208 Rollins rs. Ry man et Al;
'2f 4 Hallow ell 4 Co vs.. Hu E
200 Hammond 4 Co. vs.. Lu-
cas- ct al;
ynf Housley vs. Hogan et ~;
07 HOke a hrO. v Jackson;
.2US lllmWell vs.. Tel' graph
Compa J
200 J. hnsOn ~. oois ri IL.
2 o James a Co. VI. owen rt
al
III Insurance Company ".
Peck q al;
IliZ Jenkins ". Bu Ii ct nj;
p 3 kerby Va. Brockwry;
IA Linsry W. Bridge Co.;
30 Mckinney vs Shelly;
'Zl6 MeCampbell, trustee vs..
Hicks ct al;
III Same vs.. Mar;
lis Nc .htOsh Va. Mavor and
Aide men.
2l9 Nara vs. Insurance Co.;
% Ma!ioy W. Turnpike Co.
:2l 81 Roberts It al vs.. Jack
son;
222 Oldham vs.. Pau. eX'r;
% Petway W. Cruicher e; al.
I2I4 Pope vs. Washington.
4th week.
Il26 Mining Company vs..
Mitchell ct al.
'226 Murrell VS.. Ma,Or and
Ald'mn Of Nashville;
227 Minnett 4 wihcOop VS..
McCombs ct nj;
Z2s Morgan 4 Co. VS.. Vick-
house;
229 Mills VS.. Stewart;
Z3U Matt n vs. Beatty;
23, Murrell 4 Mailoek VS.
Tenn 4 Ala. X Il. Co;
292 Ovens VS.. Johnson;
l233 Porte field IS. Beatty;
l23t Stewart & Go. VS.. Hume;
I235 Same vs.. Bowlinl;
l236 Samuels, by next friend
vs.. Mayor 4 Aldermen Of
Nashville;
~ ShegoPg vs.. Simms;
23S Wright VS.. Crenshsw;
23g z mmerman VS.. McNairy;
$40 Bank Of Tennessee VS..
Hampton ct al;
24l Camuse vs.. Patterson;
242 State OF Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson ct al;
9 8 Bell VS.. WEIGH;
24l Guthrie and wife W.
Rains;
Pas Jordan vs. Davidson;
246 Porter ". Bergsn:
24I Livingston W Mayor and
Aldern en- q Nashville,
PAS Barns W.. Gilman,
2,g Rains vs.. Williams;
80 Childress vs.. Ga en-;
25t Corporat on OF Nashville
vs.. Hamilton;
252 Same vs.. II ggins;
s!S Same vs.. FINN;
20 same vs.. Gurnand:
, ) Btllentine vs.. Brown;
256 WooCflk vs. n. and G.
Railroad Co;
25T Mayor { Ald'men Nash
vile expsrte;
25S Mayor & Al mn OF Nash-
vile expHrte,
$50 Olds VS. McFadden;
260 Campbell ". Crenshaw
ct al,
2sl Corporaticn vs.. Moore;
263 Morrison Va. Graham;
.6S Same vs.. same,
- Same -. same;
a65 Same We. sane,
% Same vs.. same.
g. Same ". same;
6S PinksTton vs.. CrenshaW
ct Al;
? . Smith 4 Co. vs.. Same;
2IO Same vs.. SAINT;
2Ii same W. same;
~ ans ~. SAINT;
2T3 Childress We. Hampton
eI al;
274 Jones ". N4nee;
Th Leake W. iiareIl.
.T6 Hrey ct al ~. knight etsl;
" Jackson W. iIsil;
2 S n0dd W nenTy-& Skinner
STs Pope vs Washington;
81 same W same,
III Same w same;
2Ss Peck q 81 a " Mortcn;
2SS Pointer vs. Bell;
sS4 Papin " YOisot;
l55 Pr L " Carter et el;
s~i Paris W Jackson
81 sesy, trustes " Tarpley
A Pyle,
'ss shute vs Bizley,
,~9 stevens vs. HAmiltisn et Al
80 Shute W Hsd'ey r. Rl;
.9l same vs. Williams et a.;
,92 Van Dyke, adm'rts Pearl
80 SsldrOn Va Scruggs;
.9t W.rm IN " Casey;
95 whilwvrth Ts Seaany et
81,
% Wesi vs. Brown;
.9J Warren W Union Bsnk,
e5 Aiiord " Scales ear,
- 6lsases et al admir- W.
Bczell It n;
lisa Same " GOodlett et al;
iai fame " East Il sl;
, 2 Wiis. n W G Csrter;
Is3 Whiteman ss Carter