Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1856-01-15

Reusorss 81 NJ. RUTHERFORD Of GooAicsd Roas- Q,
Deis', oH ns ma q JiHHas. isos. NJ. ke-P,,s
ton or ~ 'adessfe osoHer's"i y tAe bor dirsc road
ffos Charlottesville % RsoAaoad.
RUrHERFooRD objections which had been
sed 70 the on bad ben rhsr to it, detail. than TO IL. Object
should the ssheSt be nnn'' pOsponed' Why upn
q ne House the merit, q N, propo.On, ans
iadsan.s poipensrOai involved ono'aprO@Ss hostility to the
ets, q the sl In .h,ps and under an
But n SSS S Sri SsSa
sni bad SssSrissI the
string The one s aud the
SrS sn0,a Sn s SS and h had arsH- A. the PROPOSED road
line Bu, what was the et' The rad would pass
through country dis,sn, both oa, s canal and
Nj. AZ SsaSfs G S .SS had ssS
iavd by work. Tor The construction Of ~heh they had been
had byH diverted nom hSir doors the dsuy
valuable had beeu Nd vaiue,s estate
King place Throughout the RS. Of the ssa 'f 10
ip then hs ss ana Hss,' Of G,s upon The @sg.,
Of portion OF our fellow citizens who had be- busne by
ma, they might be permitted the@.,yrs Not a
only petition Cor leave TO s,T@ud er
Il 6s BEN III, II ppse o. GS Gss e,Sp
SOME var p,' to grant mere gi Of wherever they
sPpca who would have any Just
Company they xerr ea,'syrs asking for
nd an nsSPSadsn 'SPs were HPPyns for the shsrsr
that IT, woad be Injurious the Interests the State unjust
usr vested rights Hence refusal Of the
rea Ga What ground could be refused 10 them conceded
ssis hl, ihs "S.ny; iss d-reS to band IT, who else had
would be No r,Vge or none Ssn from ,
rail- ROAD a. had been ingenious urged be in urIou
sieteit WY was provided both by the bill aud by
ny .hSsd be diverted to the construction of the short
In tn time, under the b
pos When The central road shcslI b. Rni 10 ~, s
there necessity OF trade
and that would the all sOykhoders
their Sysahl- but this question for the
fr fsi. were to be- dSas,ei The, souia he e r " D S
II iey shoad construct the road would their voluntary
@ would exist no ongvr aud simply back under the Law
the power which had granted them.
IL was then, light which gave nobody any us,
cause OF objection or complaint which could way uue
Investments either Of individuals
~s earnestly desirl aud urgently ne by repre-
lie had risen, at Una" time to say this much and
Impression A. 10 te sentiments and wants Of the
people who lived upon the line Of the PROPOSED rOad might
hts her W-r. sS.T nI.r @bicn ,Sn,a,,I n -, A., Ai
Louisa aud fluvanua Tie state aud the cirns the whole
had sotneimes been objected because they tended divert
nom our o~n cities to the ce Of the North But this
udyd ~ The highest considerations OF pube advantage because
IL would shorten by nearly thirty miles, Of
uuuicaon between the ohio aud TdywatcT Virginia.
legislation Improvements ought
dree'S An attraction Of the untold produce Of & great West
ethuen Of our commercial independence aud of direct
po,ponrnrnt bill commit them,
s,lve- to incorporating hostility the great object which
that they would with notifications under
We rosa in"th blra from r great valley OF TIE Mis-
ssspp 10 the s-alr % the Atlantic lie be- allow
of injury To- rrconucii,
whole state should be refused by legislature which had granted
omoney from tie Fpbc rival aud improve
able wrong