Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-04-18
CASES AT MAY TERM, 1856.

bOHcus VI y dU'Gc q IT,
VS.. Stevenson & White
Brunson ct al. VS., Hick-
man ct al:
Bank, Planters vs.. Hud-
son.
Bolton, Dickens 4 Co. vs..
Kimbro;
Berry, use, &C. vs., Eos
ter, ad;
Brigham vs.. Stratton ct
al. lT2 &
Same VS.. Craighead ct
al; iI3 4
Same VS.. Hays ct al.
Beatty vs.. Clo6felteI;
Battle VS.. Napier;
Bank Planters VS. Green
field ct al;
Balm vs.. Watkins ct al,
Ex.;
Bradley VS.. Edmonson;
Bank Tenn. VS. Plummer
4 Co. ct al; AS 4
Same VS.. Napier ct al;
Same VS.. Merritt ct al;
Beatty vs., WEIGH;
Brooks 4 Bro. VS.. Lon
ginette;
Benson vs., Goss, Elk;
Bradley VS.. Bridge Co;
BostiCk VS.. Hamilton ct
al;
Bank Tenn. VS.. NIchOl-
son;
Same VS.. Hampton ct al.
Bell VS.. Welsh;
Boyd VS. GOwdy, ad.;
Bass VS.. DOnels0G;
Bank, Plan ers VS.. RObb
ct al;
Bassett VS.. Kreider ct al;
Brown vs.. Craig;
Bang 4 Co. vs.. stewart
Boyd VS.. Railroad;
Bank Tenn. VS.. Donel-
son; loS 3
Same VS.. Smell ct al;
Cross VS.. Green;
Chilcutt vs.. M'lntire;
Childress VS.. Jackson;
Same vs.. Owen;
Corporation vs.. Finn;
Same vs.. Gurnard;
Crutcher VS.. FOSTER
CantreIl vs.. Sloan;
Cole vs.. NJ. & A. OF n;
COussens vs.. Mountz;
Chavous vs.. Dickinson ct
al;
Chndress VS.. Corpora
ton
Collins VS.. johnson;
Childrcss VS.. Napier ct al;
Campbell vs.. Crenshaw
& Paris;
Childress vs.. Hampton
ct al;
Same VS.. Woods;
Same VS.. Patterson;
Corbitt vs.. University;
Cook vs.. Flynn;
Cutter VS.. Stewart;
Doe Lessee vs.. Ray
Same vs.. M'Ewen;
Drake VS.. james;
Davis vs.. Noseley;
Dobson, Ad. vs.. Dabbs;
De Ia Hay vs. Lawrence;
Driver ". HitChiugs;
Dunn vs.. hreider;
Davis vs.. Bradley;
Douglass v. Cartwright
d Armstrong;
Dodd vs.. Henry & skin
uer;
Douglas vs.. Nolensville
Turnpike Co;
Den Lessee vs.. Higgins;
DUnc n vs.. Morton,
Davidson vs. Herman;
Dawson vs.. Bigley;
Evans 4 Smith vs. Shivers
ct al;
Eath-rly vs.. Ninson;
Ewing, Trustee vs.. Rail-
road;
Eusley vs.. Vance;
Elliston ". Young et al;
Eakin & Co. vs.. Cheat
ham & Co,
Flowers vs.. Napier ct al;
Fay vs.. Sloan;
Farmers Man. ICo. vs..
Hobbs & Henley,
Frazier, Trus. vs.. Hinton;
Frey ct al. vs.. knight ct
al;
Frazier VS.. s. d. Toledo
ct al;
Frings vs.. Zimmerman ct
al;
Farris vs.. Hundley;
Fall 4 Cunningham vs..
Bergen;
Flippin vs.. Napier et nj;
Farquharson vs. Beatty;
Fulbright and wife vs..
Lauier ct al;
Floyd 4 90. vs.. Gould;
Fly vs.. Moseley ct al,
Foster vs.. Tooney;
Fuss /, use, &C. vs.. Sam
uels.
Gowdy W. Marshall; Is 4
Goldberg vs.. Hinton,
Gilman vs. KimbTO;
Goh IS. Stevenson, Pres;
Glover & Boyd vs.. Col
lett;
Goldberg a %. vs.. lnsa-
rance Co,
Guthrie and wife v.
Rairs,jr,
Goodwin -. Paul;
Gray vs. Holt;
Gleaves W. Telegraph
Company
Gilman vs.. Wright,
Gregory 4 Young vs..
ERAiiroad;
Goodwin vs.. Stanley;
Green vs.. Cheatham,
Same vs.. Morton;
Gravin " Shelley,
Gordon a Co. vs.. Lane
ct al;
Hyde vs.. MADDOX,
Hughes vs.. Gilbert;
Harris VS.. Smiley, ~;
Harrison 4 Richards vs..
Boiling & strAtton;
Haley vs.. Wetmore;
Hammer vs.. Carroll, Agt;
HARRIS ". Pitts
Horn and wife vs.. Stew
art;
Hays vs.. Edmonson 81 al;
Halle 4 Co. vs.. Bridge
Go;
Rollins vs. RymAn Ell al;
HalloWell 4 Co ". Hume;
HamWell vs.. Telegraph
Co;
Hawkins vs.. Croker;
Howard " Beatty;
HUI vs.. Payne;
Harrisvs. RUSSELL a al;
Hubbard vs. Gowdy, III;
Horn -. Walling;
Hughes vs.. HcsteT,
Jasper ct al ". Barns,
Jones v. Mitchell;
Jackson. IL -. GILBERT
4 Son,
March 4l-eo3W