New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-05-07
la " LNI,ELLIGLNCE.

SUPERIOR CoURT-sfEcI.L TEsM-MAY 6-Before Judge
BoswORTH.
Powell sgt Finch ct al.
Tie case is not in condition TO be tried until all the
defendants have been served aP2eaed rs at issue as to
Finch or he is in default for 10, answeTicg.
Uaugley set. Townsend.
Plaintiff entitled 10 re deem. Reference ordered TO
ascertain owing the defendant executor for payments
n elnsq.ips liens and by reason OF sxS ses sna
sra for eJs paid tesaor to redeem from the
thereon.
sHRRIFPs sAIE-yoUiTY OF REDEMPTION.
Hsughey sg'. Town e: 4, Executor ,
Tie part, being lessee of certain premises for the
tenn Of Il yssIs Eon the lst Of February f- executed
noEage OF said premises the Oh Of February 1874 TO Sc
cure the pes next Of ~ COO which serwsd ssssned TO
bishop rdEmeu for 500 u recovered against PLAIN
I'm aud toeheted the 18th OF March, lo he was converted
Of en- oHei punishable b IN the state rn,on
eight MONTH and Immediately comm ited: M,
The premises consisting Of two los and sepa'ae dwens
soI At .Seias sale in ese parcel the l6h Of May
1876 on an execution issued in 1874 Oh said gdsnsn soo '
h dsror ID iesaior was The prrehser ne showing 81 @
.oLed '-''D -" Wv" -
johnson permitted to and did take immediate possession
ssdeI an seeit sith the lsai 0s,aeI 1a .S 10
PAD oI nat pun o.e TO satisfy the none! ga4 o. ~ a
70 Ieteem the Premises f. such lie iecese- $40 was
pad NOE han sufficient for tie pgrpcss.
On The llh CT November 1913 BIZ op commenced n asnoA
= lie supreme Court forc!ose said mortgage ana tas 81
piscn Under such .n;enee On the 9th Of Jsnary $40, as
usua cree tcr foreclosure a. ! sale wss made re
sry sij End .tr-ck 81 job sla ~ 500 wh lal low"
$3.50 per Of the OF h. bill BY the is'i CT
se ne bslanee be pa: on ae Sth u Ms'ee t .
resell The lrsi purchaser Re liable fJr aly eshceAey pro
diced BY, add the expenses Of. svch resale.
" Tie coIsent Of JObnso- soe!tr without any y'el
~ MT the Shef IssJll the Whole IN olo o. ls
s'h - yy 1888 and the Premises ere s.riH % .
~ -3-7 Johnson ade IaJG ent 70 tAe SLstl o.
ccui q such second sale. The igchase was . oe ee
q te sh Of August thereafter sd IN other rsse -s ef
q he "a sale were the those OF the nis
Tie terms q that sale having been eo,pHe S1 iu
sheIih advertised The premises 10 be az Al sold o. OF
SEPTEMBER 1919 The sale was counieTnanded D ba9Pi
sofnty sc the Sherr deducted hs coM and eA Lse' "a
TIE "a paid By JohHsoa tie rst sale to h ard fefgded
Ne ssnce 70 Johnson WHO raid 20 bshop ne anoi cue on
H. eeTee srt The thar sctC1, TIE shen not bi
Iryy 10 such r,sr The Sheris made Of
eLer sse, executed deed H. pursu.nee 81 = Joan
death
Lete grated defendant on e lv,a
OF Alr. l66, and this s:ton eonmenc-d Nc Pr
cured sEef Geel johnson, purt haseI O. ne
non 70 be cutec sd recorded tie h OF JuLe i''
besIins date on the l5th OF Augus', 1919 -, ,zhich
held, that the plaintiff under the agreement h.
JOIN sou tick possesn 1o his purchase on W re the
entitled. "a between himself md the delen1eH. -ts Ell
premises TIE sied redeemed from that sale N su,ids
ecisd ~ jolnson, and the moneys paid 20 I'm -
ceturt fer thai LIrose and with tfai ne .,e-. Term
That under The deeiiol made by iis -eiars. 10 NJ
M April les In DAVIS - FIhsEi "a 49, a.s6s bsrn
forfcinrr-rf Vf.fl- utrer'f -
e.ced b, srf, - ct sialnss y H..
rsison a.lsrs -oa,.cti'n Shl'' ''f
G-lts. 49,, ur,rG IA: ,sle ls1.;