The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-08-30


which mGEass %S" VA, "a :. = z SSss % s S ss. @ o.
another held ~ him and me rsalniEs interest q said W
Z SAID Wsisf ssd Jones one SSSsd sssd undsI
ssd ssS Fo.a is dated sG - @ 70 a 5 f S I s: s s
party realty principally interested IN sAid she' sAe his name
Iheren cloak aEd win or Infringing aud sOaRg tho
ssed % be ersn In 1850 sad and ors
attempted 70 take possession gueslys mIs oa sad Iancho
which rise suiI for ioIeOe enuy and ds'ancT
Wsrs aSd ob.p against TSyS an@ GRAY sSSsaneny n
and Others formed Ior working rad quIck
said Guadalupe mining Company and particularly
conpanaBts
and Eddge the real either q s whole nearly The
Robert Rose Of The counsel of the complainant and hS
In the suit before the United States district court IN Ca
ns employed them nbnn the confirmation by the
United States board Of land commissioner "a California Of 'h
Laurehce and in order 10 avoid posAbe and dc
msaners said agreed Juso
Laros clam ~ be prosecuted before s board o commissioners IN
Of said Fussa beug understood hSI the shape and
on Of the continuation should not atsct the gus Of eihr
obtaining the continuation, which, the ath Of October 1854
was mado BY me board o. 70 fossa ING dsendnn
lated their said agreaen and insisted that the tad canhmaoB
vested aboit ue in said Fossai and his They have
deputed fhen9eves-namey said ddgeo sell said pro?
ey the Atlantic States and IN Europe and he has ma and is
Congress Of % March, lss ascertain and sete private
tie United States court enue to the hsnea,, Of the
apparent from Cook by deeds subsequent to coasey
from Cook Taylor Gray estoPPed deny
time Of his selling Taylor and Cray The defendants, Edg.
disregard Taylor Gray, and 10
ueat as nul The aforesaid final adgnen. OF November ih
effect Of said continuation, and tus disturb The
and throw cloud on his uIs. The bI caaes on inimaI m
ha, The legal le TO all he land conn IN The Of
legal from Fossa said Ros while IN California
progress and that rrmsncn had BEEN b."
did moi inform the complainant Of sad Roses
had said Rose Complainant poprry Of
aFPeaed states now pendng on appeal
The q1seS @ q, states ds;,s, Soul. m The
tain from Attorney General of United order Win
sat- judicial decision IN the oendns f' S
tween him and his associates on the one side and e
The complainant dvised that his in r
URrd district ccprt Of Caliona f,s cotruset
Cray is citizen Of Virginia, bR has failed the
the United SiarE district for California;
sa5y steps 70 prevent BY injunction The Of the
Gray and beneaciaries 10 AID are on
n a 70 sSs @ The ssd, deed " G s co' 10 csok The Two deeds
2ist March, 1885, and the assignments in pursuance thereof
Gssdaape dao S aSd G Ssd
February ls1 By virtue Of THIS Iea,y and Of The legal titles TO
all others claiming under said from
gae Their rights desysd, uncontrolled and unaffected
y any auon Of !he board Of LAND Of Caon0 con
usd TO oblain the patent himself and said Gray
aforesaid ueay nations Inc
be issued that said rights be dereed TO be charge
deeTced complainant reconvsy
him, patent shall
patnant properly secured under decree Of this The
bi Injunction defendants, EldIdge
Lauence and fUssA from selling said lands disturbing
eopAihaht the thereof &c. and from
the said with said Rose
Ead confirmation. The bill
A. HendTietE Commissioner the Land Office enIained
om suins granting, delivering said Charles
Fossa hB asgBees in pursuance OF
his hyoF, until the defendants have answered
and until the further order
fnles from
OF November IL, s52, valid and binding
renoel Eddge, and fofai and preclude
tb- conveyed by said sales the
Cray Surviving aforesaid
patent issued under The aforesaid
CUok Gfay that Laurence Edndge and
Fsssi b. ordered reconvey much Of the rights ~
tad rancho originally conveyed by COok
ut should a4mc u
FOsEat previously the final decIson Of the
And appearing thai the said Hgrr I.aurtuccl,
John Bowie Cray fhCm residents II the Ds
Of Columbia, heTeupon, hIs 7 day ordered
by the that the complainant by copy
20 Be Published in Published
said District, twice
,urth Monday Of Ociober notice the Ead
appear person solicitor
fourth Monday o Ocinber premses
any hey have why decree ought
Othsrwlse, the same viii be taken for confessed.
by order of the
Test: mo. A. SMITH, CIcrk.
True Copy-Tesl: mo A. SMITH, CIer1,
June asw6w