New-York daily tribune., 1856-07-18

day after receiving tuch ib10rh6tl0U, ask him tor
punntoIs, st the matter to ths bottom, and allox no
misui derstaLding to exist Cheers L. tdst the
conouct Of the American GovemmeLtl No! Month
oftr month they allow thee things to 20 on, never
seLd for Mr.. CHAMPION, never tell him what it w,s
supposed be was guilty Of dOiog; they ALLOW theee
things to accun ulate in order that when the proper
time arrives they may either take advantage Of them,
and act upon them, or deal with them - matters
which do rot deserve confederation (Cheenl. Taen
ray, Sr, there was an abstinence tho part uf the
ubited States Government from those stepe which
il was their duty TO take if they thought
that the agents Of foreign nations were vio-
Iatibg the laws OF the Union Hear, hsarl Bot
thin when her Aaesty's Government at a very earlv
penCd ouno that these % were likely TO pro
duce embarrassment between th. two countries taey
su-penoec-oi, rather they definitely stopped Of their
own accord--these arrangements. An toa gentleman
has criticised the dates and has stated these
tUbs we've not acted upon until August. Surely how.
ever, question OF weeks or days is iGmaterlsl in
matter OF this sort lsus the fact beng that the
British GOv,rnmeLt when It leaned that these pro-
ctedings were likely to be embarrassing, Of itS gn
accord, dur, cted that they should be suspended
lHtar, heaJl. Th.D, gentlemen cay, there was no
apology made Why what more full apology, what more
ctmpete reparativn could one Government make to
another when they found that certain proceedings of
theirs might furnish grounds Of complaint than putting
AN end TO those proceedings Hear hear. Don't
tel NE of verbal apologies! l say the apology of
ceeos war one nhI tely more valuabIeninitxiy more
satisfactory 10 the Government Of Amercs-a greater
proof OF the detre Of the British Government that
nothing should occur to ihtenupt the friendly restionr
between the two countries than any verbal apology
that could have been offered [Cheenl. say then.
Sn, there is no question about ooLcealment, there 4
question sbtut deception, there is question about
our lot having made separation for the Ofense if sny
oiitnte had been committed Hear, hearl. But il ia
d, claIed ought to have ackhowledged that we did
wrong. Why, We did not believe we had done wrong;
We did not believe We had deliberately violated the
laws Of the CniOn neither intended ths nor do We
believe in our understanding of those laws that thew
have been violated by any authorized British agent.
Hear, hesil. We, however, received complaints
ir' N the United States Government, ard intiaaions
that our agents ough. to be Withdrawn. In reply 70
to thai We D. Mt detailed statements from them proving
es We thought and hoped TO the sa,isf.ct,n of toe
UDi.d States Government that their impression was
erroneous, ana that nothing had been done which us
ufed the Dissatisfaction they had expressed. IN an.
sver to that the Grited States Government SAID thew
were satisfied with regard IN the conduct OF her Maies
tys Government, that al questions be. wen the Two
Cove rDn,snts had ceased aud settled but that
D.v.ttt kss th, still retained then opinion n resoect
to the British agents, and tba: they therefose deemed
n se agents unacceptable organs Of communication
b'tws en- the tive counties. WhAt :sen, Wa the
coune sbicb We had TO oar.nel We h.d % dstsr
nTne sAeh'. . su;h rate Of :hn4s, We shc7,a g1e