The true Democrat., 1856-02-12

We clip from the Pine Bluff Republican the following letter, containing the resolutions of a democratic meeting held at Red Fork, in De- sha county:
 Red F6rk Ark, an 5, 1856. | MR. EDIroR-Enclosed I send you CODY of the resolutions offered by myself, and adopt ed by the democracy of Desha, in convention. on the 27th ultimo. As these resolutions have not been published, please insert them in your valuable paper, that they may be read by the democracy:
 1st. Reso7uez That we endorse and re-af1irm the democratic platform, confirmed by the con vention of the democratic party at Baltimore, in 1852
 2d Reso7vea, That we condemn Know Noth- lngism, and believe its destructive features to be both unchristian and anti-repubiican
 Sd. Reso7vel, That we approve the admins tration of Franklin Pierce
 4th. Resolved, That we recommend the de- mocratlc representatives in the congress of the United States, to maintain their position of in- tegrlty to the consttuton and faith to the de mocratic party believing that success will inev- ltably crown their efforts to preserve law and order.
 9th. Reso7uea, That we approve of Gov Conway's tirmness in protecting the interest of the State, in connection with the Real Estate Bank of the State of Arkansas.
 9th. Resolyed, That we approve of the Jef- fersonian democratic doctrine of rotation in office, and believe that four years, or one term l Is long enough for one man to be Governor of Arkansas.
 7th Resoloed That we recommend the de- mocratlc party to hold a convention in Little Rock, in May next to nominate candidate for Governor and candidates on the presidential electoral ticket, and that the democracy of De- sha county, at the circuit court in April next appoint delegates thereto, with proper instruc- 1 tlons.
 8th Reso1Ued, That these resolutions be pub lished in the Sentinel and Pine Bluff Republi- can, and other democratic papers.
 RED FORK.
 On these resolutions the Republican remarks
 "With all the resolutions, except the 9th we heartily concur. But would not by any means be understood as objecting to the resolu- ton, because it conflicts with Gov E. N. Con- ways prospects for re-nomination. Upon this subject it is the settled policy of this paper tc observe silence, and suffer the honest Unsolicitel shall be. By their decision in May next arc
 
 In our opinion, if our Red Fork friends will permit us to express oursef canddly, the 9th resolution is entirely wrong. We object tc it, not because of its "ruling out'' operation against our present worthy Governor, not be- cause we are unwilling to accord to our Red Fork friends the widest latitude in their choice of a candidate for Governor, but because it (tht 9th resolution,) does injustice to the truth o ry,'-injustice to the Sage of Monticello J e1erson never went so far in his doctrine O rotation in otlice," as to preclude all ndividu al from aspiring teoice to the same position. | he did, he failed cgregiously to practice wha he taught for, it will be remembered, that h, not only aspired t'oice to the presidency, bu was elected and served twice.
 Whatever objections our Red Fork friend. may have to the re-nomiuation of Gov. Con way, they ought not to do Jelterson great al act of injustice. h cousenting to become candidate for Governor the second time, Gov Conway does 50 in accordance with both til, teacAinys and practice of the great apostle o democracy.