New-York daily tribune., 1856-04-28
FROM BOSTON.


BOsTON Friday, April 25 1856.
That was a very good reminder you put in the
other day for the benefit of our great aud general
Court in the matter of Judge LOring. | confess
that it had slipped my memory that matters stood
in so good shape for further action. trust that
many days will not pass by without the thing being
brought before the Legislature in some way suffi-
cient 10 call for an explanation of inscton, if not
to compel some action. 1t should have been taken
in hand earlier, our Conscript Fathers have now
the excuse of the accumulation of business at
the end of the session for giving 1t the gO-by.
To be sure, they have no such cruel limit set 10
their perception of S3 day as your atrocious Con
sttution puts in the way of your progressive
patriots and they might make this very sufficient
excuse for holding OH month or two longer, II
they chose. But planting time has arrived and
bucOlica ayOcations are loud IN their demands
upon our legislators, to which the affairs of State
must Weld am sure | would consent that they
should sit till next Christmas, or TILL like the party
in the apologize told by Burke in Parliament their
sitting part grew 10 the benches, II they would
only rid us of that disgracefu magistrate. lie
has been living for year in the nlost fagrant and
impudent disObedience TO the laws OF the State,
of an insult should prompt the Legislature to give
him the efectual kick behind, which Governor Car
dner intercepted last year and hlndered IRON
,epdnp him sprawlng into the street. HIS WEB
ster Wbig friends could make no objection now,
when they remember that law is TO be obeysi,
however unpleasant it may be, while 1t is law;
| believe. when told you of the speech Mr..
Samuel d. Bradford made 10 the Overseers OF har-
ward College, in explanation OF his voting against
I lbrNte | All
il on the ground Of the incompatbility OF the two
offices. This was true to that extent, believe,
but have since learned that he further JUSTIFIED
his vote on the ground that he was not NJ person
for the office. lie had made inquiries on the sub
iect and had found the opinion Of the profession
sngulary unanimous as T. his claim To such
post Mr.. Bradford further censured o! lnphc--
ZION AT least the too common disposition on the
n.rt of corporations TO make the otices IN n ,lr
Gift provisions for poor relations and needy trends
and advised that OF the College 10 be specially "A
their guard against even the suspicion OF " nepo
fi.m in the distribution of lts patronage mis-
x,,s most excellent advice. and did Mr.. Bradford
the greatest credit; but it was very bitter phI
for the Corporation of the College 10 swallow
Had il been offered by Mr.. Paltrey Mr Charles
= Adams. or Judge Thomas Russell, OF any one
to;nted With Free-Soilism or Republcanism, Il
Nould have been of no importance at all. 1t nad
been mere ebullitisn of Abolition spite. but
Mr.. Bradford is a Hunker of the hunkers-s
Democrat of the DemOcrats-Nationa 10 the very
backbone-an original Jackson man-who ha'
never sveryed from the faith delivered TO the
ssints of that communion" dyed in the WOOL
but not in the wool of his head, for there never
was even the faintest wave or crisp there thaI
looked like wool. In this speech be approved OF
the action of Judge LorinS in sending Burns back,
and of the Governor in refusing to remove him IN
answer TO the Address Mr. Bradford Is further,
gentleman Of education and travel merchant
of GREAT emineAce, and one of the richest men IN
the State. So YOU may imsgine how much com
fort Judge Loring and his friends got from hls
opinion in his favor. ~ ,,
| see YOU and some other erlNew-York papers are
making yourselves disagreeable about the Co'y
trade. Now YOU know how much your New
Vork merchants can stand and. OF course, play
your cards accordingly. But give you warning
that if YOU have any Boston mercantile adver'
tiS;n, worth keeping. you must mind YOUR eye, or
you'Il lose ii. We are not going to staId having
our First Merchaats-gcdly men members Vl