Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-09
CASES AT JANUARY TERM, 1873.

t54 Lowe rs. Slean,
lla5 Moore vs.. H1ghes:
1856 Merritt VS.. Benson ct al:
ll57 Snaeklett VS.. Gilman;
li5S Stewart VS.. Eduondson;
l159 State Of Tenn use &c vs..
Fusseil 1T al;
'16O Treadway 4 wife vs..
Goodwin admir-,
ISL Wallace rs. Aekiin;
i62 Thompson trus. vs. Tenn.
and Ala. Railroad Co;
'le3 Williams vs. Glover;
Ii64 Beatty vs.. Clodfelter;
los TillmanVs Williams
l6i PetEay vs.. Wilson ct al;
,6I Dunn vs.. KreideT;
iE9 Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
Co vs.. Marlin;
.i69 shute vs.. n 4 9 Railroad
Co;
40 Ewing trustee vs.. same;
Ill n Z Q Railroad Co VS..
DouelsOn.
i72 Lanier 4 Falls W.. Vsnlier
.lI3 Livingston vs.. Nash. Gas
Light Co;
.i74 Gilman vs.. Wright:
'i7o Lanier 4 McHickle vs..
VanIier:
IFS Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
.I7T Young vs.. SummerhIll;
IT'S Corporation Of Nashville
vs.. Rayford;
ItT9 Same vs.. Higgins;
.lS0 Same v. Raiiord;
.tS1 Same VS. Same;
.l62 Same v. Hamilton;
.ts3 GoR vs.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &C.
.ts4 Crutchei vs.. Foster
IS Childress vs.. s.Mammel ct al
.is6 Cantrsl vs.. Sloan;
Isl Doe. lessee, ". Waggo-
ISS Brigham vs. stratton ct al;
.tS9 Same vs.. Craigbead;
i9D Same vs. Havs ct al;
tg1 Bacchus vs. Porter;
1872 Bosiey vs.. WEIGH
1913 Cole VS.. Mayor and Al
der.nen Of Nashville;
.Ie4 Davis vs.. Bradley;
1876 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;;
1876 Frazier, trustee, rs. Hin
ton;
g. Glover 4 Boyd, use &C
vs. Collett.
.i95 Goldberg & Co. vs.. Insu-
rance Co.
.I99 Harris VS.. Pitts;
'2a0 Hsysvs Edmundson ct
n Horn and wife ys.Stewart;
2 : Lellystt 4 Ewing vs. Mills
4 Egan;
2)3 Hollins vs.. Ry man ct al;
2 i HalloEst Z Co. vs.. Hu
300 Hammond 4 Co. vs.. Lu-
cas- ct al;
2a6 Hcusley ". Hagan ct Al;
E07 Hoke & bro. v, Jackson;
2US Hsmwell va. Telegraph
Compary:
l29o johnson vs.. N'oOie ct al,
q D James 4 Co. vs.. owen et
I211 Insurance Company W.
Peck { al;
lil2 Jenkins VS.. Bush ei al;
Z 8 Kerby vs.. BFOckWsy;
lsl4 Linsry vs.. Bridse Co.;
.2i5 Mckinney vs. Shelly;
216 MeCsnpbell, trustee vs..
Hicks ct al;
.2lT Same vs.. Mari;
|llS Mcintosh W.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
'3I9 Nara vs.. Insurance Co.;
20 MaiiOy vs.. Turnpike Co.
.22l McRCDsrts ct al vs.. Jack
son;
I222 Oldham vs.. Pau', ex'r;
q PeiwEy vs. CrulcheT c. al.
l224 Pope VS.. Washington.
4ah Week
225 Mining Company vs..
Mitchell ct al.
226 Murrell vs.. Mavor and
Ald'mn Of Nashville;
22T Minnett 4 WibcOop VS..
McCombs ct al;
i22S Morgan 4 Co. vs.. Vick-
house;
229 Mills W. Stewart;
230 Mart n vs.. Beatty;
2Si Mgrren a Matlock vs.
Tenn 4 Ala. r X. Co;
232 Owens vs.. johnson;
i239 Pofterfield VS.. Beatty;
l23f Stewart 4 60. vs.. Hume;
J235 Fame vs.. Bowling;
1886 Samuels, by next friend
vs.. Mayor L Aldermen Of
Nashville;
2H Shegogg vs. Simms;
233 Wright vs.. Crenshsw;
2S9 Zmmt rman Va. McNairy;
240 Bank Of Tennessee VS..
Hamp ton ct 81;
24l Camuse vs.. Patterson;
242 State OF Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson et al;
2t3 Bell We. Welch;
Z4l Guthrie and wife vs..
Rains;
245 Jordan VS.. Davidson;
246 Porter ". Bergsn.
24T Livingston vs. Mayor and
Aldermen o. Nashville,
2iS Barns vs.. Gilman;
2,s Rains vs. Williams;
Y5O Ghildress rs. Oven;
s5l Corporal on o. Nashville
vs.. Hamilton;
252 Same vs.. II ggins;
Sa3 Same vs.. FINN;
l54 Same vs.. 0urnand;
2 5 Ballentine vs.. Brown;
256 Woo0fJlk vs.. n. and O.
Railroad Co;
Isl Mayor 4 Aid'men Nash
vile experte;
S5S Mayor a Al i'mn OF Nash
vile expArte;
259 olds vs.. McFadden;
260 Campbell vs.. CrenshaE
et al;
2S1 Corporation vs.. Moore;
262 Morrison vs.. Graham;
s63 Same vs.. same,
Pa Same W. same;
360 same vs.. same;
% Same vs.. same;
81 Same W. same;
;6S PinksrtOn vs.. Creushsw
ct al;
2f9 Smith 4 Co. ". Same,
2I0 same va same;
2Ii Same vs., same;
3I2 ,ame ". same;
2T8 Childress vs. Hampton
et al;
2T4 Jones vs.. Nance;
rs Lease vs.. liarell;
2I6 Frey et Slss. knight etal;
III Jackson W. bell;
Dodd vs. Henry 8 Skinner
zIs Pope W Washington,
81 same " same,
'ksi Same vs. same;
1ss Peek 4 81 50 vs. Mortsn;
2ss Pointer " Bell;
80 Papin vs. VOiEot;
2S5 PEEK W Carter et ei;
- Paris vs Jackson
50 Sesy, trusies " TaYp9ey !
Pyle;
}SS shuse " Bigley;
2s9 stevens vs. bamillnn etAl
2gO shute vs. Hsdley et al:
s9l same W Williams q a.;
k99 fAn nyke, adm'rVs Pearl
iy8 Naldrun gs scruggs,
80 Warmoth " casey;
9S MhigsortA " ssaluny et
al;
96 West W Brown;
t9I Warren " Unisn Bank;
sss Allord Vs Seal-s ex'r, {
is9 GleAVes et Al adm'r W !
Eosell e A.;
Boo same " Goodiett e ~;
Sii same vs East et al;
} . Wilson vs Carter
B 3 WhiEemsn vs. Carter:
8et LAnier A McNlckle W l
GWing. Dick 4 %;
THO. 7. SMILEY, clsrk.
for 1856!
q o a A y,
l07 Nassau $. N. York
J to booksellers and dealers IN