The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1856-05-18

Count WAIEwsKI declares him elf authorized TO sup
H0,. Inc ;os. expressed e the drst psnipo.sna Of
tentares OF France wholly disposed the
insertion IN tne protocol Of wish which, being fully In
IN any wsy fettsr the free action of governments.
Count BIOL would moi hesitate TO in opinion
the resolution OF the congress is to have the form midi
Gated oy Count yk but no could not take in the
name Of his court Al absolute engagement calculated to
nmit tne Independence OF the Austrian cabinet.
nne rAhi OF CLARENDON plies that each power IL
VIII Dc tbs sole judge OF the requirements of it's honor
and OF Its INTERESTS that IL is oy his intention
to restrict the authority OF the but only to
snoro Insm the opportunity Of not haviog to
Arms whenever differences may DO adjusted by other
Baron hAS1KuYTXI gives the assurance that the King
nus susuS master completely shares the ideas set forth
himself authorize to adhere Them and TO give them
the utmost oevsopsment which they admit OF.
oopnt osLoF while admitting the wisdom of the pro-
maae 70 the considers that he must refer
70 ms respecting IL before he expresses the opinion
OF the plenipotentiAries OF Russia.
Count CAvoUR be he gives his opinion wiahes tn
KNOW whether In the intention of the author OF the pro-
tae WISH 10 be expressed by the congress would
extend TO military iaterventsns directed against de aco
governments and quot instance the interven-
ton Of Austria in tie kingdom of Naples in 1921
Lore CLARENDON replies that the wish of the congress
tina. If the good offices of anohsr pc had induced the
governments Of Greece to respe, the Of neutrality
from occupying the Praus with their troops Hs refers
70 ne EFFORTS maze BY the Cabinet of Great Britain In
~ oiaer 70 prevent the armed intervention which
TOOK place ~ that time In Spain
Count WALEws adds that there is question Of sti
pustng for right or Of taking engagement; that the
limits TO the liberty Judgment Of which no power can
dv.st itself In qusstisns affecting its dignity that there
H. therefore, in alta shinQ eral cha
rsct,r to the idea entertained BY Earl Of Clarendon
and in giving to it the most extended application.
Count BIOL says that Count cavour, in speaking in
another sitting OF thu occupation of the legations by
Austrian troops forgot that other foreign troops
been invited into the Roman States. To-day, while
Of Naples 1871 he fsrgets that tho occupat N was
the result Of understanding between the 1--WE great
powers assembled 1t the Congress Of Lybsch In both
cases he attributes to Austria the merit OF initiative
and Of spontaneous action which the Austrian pleni-
potenaries far from claiming for her The nterven-
ton adverted to by the potentary Of SardDiA
place. he adds in consequence of the discussions Of the
Congress Of Laybach. It therefore comes within the
scope Of the ideas expressed by Lord Clarendon.
samiar cases might perhaps ecur and Count Buo does
not allow that Intervention carried into effect In con-
sequence Of an to between the Ave great
Of the sesond order Count Br approves the PROPOSE
tion in the shape that Lord Candon has presented it,
a. n.v nun ane oee;f but ne could not assent to
to deduce from 1t consequences favorable to de faco
governments and to doctrines which he admit
He desires besides that the conference the moment OF
terminating its abors should not ind compelled TO
discuss irritating questions calculated to disturb the
perfect harmony which has not ceasd to prevail among
Count CAveuR declares that he is fully satisfied with
the explanations which he has elctd and he accedes
to the proposition submitted to the Congress.
WheIeupon the plenpotenharies 20 not hesitate to
express in the of their the wish that
States between which any and np NAV
arise should before appealing arms have az
far rs circumstances might allow good offices Of
friendly power.
TIE penpotentiaries hope that the governments not
represented ut the congress will unite IN the sent uent
which has inspired the wish recorded In he present pro-
toctl. The signatures follow
ANNEX TO PROTOCOL NO. g.
DECLARATION
Published in the NEW YORK HERALD, May 1871