The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-10
In Equity. NO. II6l.

In the bill originally flied cause, Gray
panan but alerwaid BY leave OF the court made defend
The substance @ he original amended and supplemental D'
90 about the n Of epember 1872 by the
% California % one Jaslo Laro. q certain lands situate
SHOWN az the Rancho dc log Capaneo BY Which abso
specified therein assigns
ADVISED hat no legislative action oie, proceed
the said
e thereby passing aforesaid said
Ses s and dSs ,esoed SAD Grove coaa as aioaa
SAID aneho and aseeeea his wife by deed dated on the 81 Of
eyed Knowles Taylor Bowie Cray
of and Two said Cray ali sns neiudns The one then
worked BY one and not including The worked By com
minerals then known which might thereafter be oupd
Conveyance together light Of way water
grazing for all eae hoses belonging said Taylor and
Cray which needed for carrying said mnes also land sui
hcien for establishing smelling works building all
mnss and together with ali estate right de. nieres proper
% ana Of a Cook S sn wife m @ o. @ s
dend were accidentally omitted The omission supplied
and duly resorded on he Oh d March, s but which,
e e on the Us '
The complainant and the deendan, Gray the surviving %
March, 1850 Taylor ey ofNew
sa aaS NJ ia % IL s
eomp nan Of the ey Of IN ,hs district o. Columbia
This declaration purchasers fcer,an lands
s and S ora ee 5 ,S . s wSa aSa
Cray and other in this states
I i s @ E ass ss asS
and other things 10 said purchases then
in he name Taylor Gray
and that was deemed desirable 10 work said lands mines miner
declaration Of his and portion therein By
wive conveyed 10 The complainant te said Tayo and
saa Gray % all sS sna onar
veyed Taylor and Gay The 10 be held by complain
% papass ad s no Sel ioi il said aecass
I sna % @ his s ssos sa%
and other things de,cDbed IN The yera convey
Eft Of The patiss Of four shares Of
S? c 81 wss sy JOHN by Robert F. s,osko
Macy 2o b, Lewis Levin ao and BY James Baiaerd Tay
proper pro- estate mines. minerals, and
n s 81 aa @ Ma 10 s
trustees majority Them, their Sc and they were
SuslSsss at co%p.nsaaai assd BY The relative
% 81 d S p 70 % assa an Il several Of " @
having sold the insn who now owns large p,Ion
and objects Of The trust has devolv-
ed o. the agd sa S s wa. aa m u oh
cray" aed by one amss BrSinsd rasS as agent
me plan D0 hs @ as Isan sss sann a. S
In Ap. May iss aer said purchases and after
Taylor. VINO agent % sno~e. Taylor and also o. .,
Ioh B. Gy d e Msn. sGs ad Sr 20 a
Taylor Cook iai there uu IN the u
%Si O' Gso S. mnon @ 3 he
@ Gso sS sa ay s %.aa S s e
and did not object TO ~ nor sser. any opposs es % m M az an
rancho with Cook and that he looked 70 oook nn'
and IN .ns as made n .sas no . u amss ,aDsd
sylor wh both Cook AID gyms they 'epated assu
@ @ Cook S To raaT aa Ga, sSS James naasId Taylor
and in one instance in, listed Ss interests in il
Wgsns AZ o. The departure Of James Brained ny ssn
and him into nao'ir Of dissipation m be be
ss which o.. s W an,a 70 "ssps ne . G og lug o s
Jooes as parties. alsa b., o. complaint 70 me d. c court Of
s n pS cso aT @ - ns "S
rancho from Laro the proportions Of for Cock and
that Laros made the deed Cook that
ooos asa nas Iooh sSd ' que 70 M DIS a.
April, Isls Taylor and Gray hereinbfore
MY seven. q the aud Virgins owned ,hs resda
Inc deed om oos 10 hen was void as 10 tie peuuoosm ha
The lime ofhe purchase OF Cook and Wgns IRON Laos Wsns
session o vi me knowedge Of Taylor and Cray hs The
n,n nu o, ~ % % & @ , and "tser ,h,prs A.
Tsylsr Cray. The petitioners
rancho ha Taylor and Cray be eomPssd to re-
sweT s fab responsive IL generally specially
dening all s alegohs except the allegation as to the sale BY
nehO John Gray put responsive 10 the aver
Mentioned on he Ia q March, lss q
made for transsrng this sun TO The district count Of the United
By H. hs and by order Of the state sd
transferred Amer proceeding, in the Unted
outn this bin that court on the lit Novembor 1881 made the
following DEGREES
Unitsa siass Diriei couitor the Northern ,re Of California
"''''''' "'Is.' S,. and '0'f'' Final Decree.
This case coming on 70 be heard on the stipulation Of parties BY
their respective solicitors file, the b and exhibits
heeto aPpenasd aad AMER hsarng argument o. eon,e S y @
said having been duly verified by oath, and no
replication hed thereto by me compalnan DC dsem.a ana s
forth said
the sa defendants and he assigns and grantees be- and the
painan And Is uthe ordered adudgd and decreed that
se SAID % s lad ne ded ron
forth in sa be- and the hereby confirmed forever
passed them fee from all claim in behalf Of said com
plainants whatsooysr
set forth 10 said answer Of the a OF March A. D. 1850
said John B Gray and Jane NJ hts wife and the said KNOWLES
4 stockton John D. Macy Lewis Levin, James Banerd
Taylor the nd became porsed Of the several rights set
whatsoever the of said companan either ofthon
and they have full peect and val subsstng nue 70 the said
ad "a n fnr,her ordered adiudeea ana docreod that the con
set forth In said from Grove COX 10 Jose
bearing sste the os OF apnary 1875 bc and the same
hereby confirmed against the said oompanant free from a
claims Of The said ompananis, either Of en by way Of trust
ordered, sdIudred, d,cresa
associates barag day January, le fe the
hereby cou1med FREE from all cnims Of the said com
And Is uher ordered addesd and deered that the convey
t forth In said from John Christie and from said
attorney TO John Gray and Wife, bearing date the aad day
December sis be- and the hereby, confirmed against
said compananis free from all claim of said
4 81 her of NON, BY way trust otherwise
And Il further ordered, ndn decreed convey
Uoos dated he SD epebe s45 AID The deed f,om Use al
TO Grove cnos and ohers hsrcn mentioned dated the e