New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-08-23
La " LNI,ELLIGE NCE.
SUPREME COURT-A,sASy SPECIAL TERM.
TIE DIsPUTED JUDGTSuIP-OPINION OF JUDGE

HARRIS
The People the sstion Of Ches Peabody sssics The
Auor. eyGenersl.
MOTION HASDANCS.
Tie papers ulUn which the motion was founded
the gepsrs judges held in November
't he re stor voted for By the electors OF tho Fr Ju
dc ilsfrct f.. tie scc4sOt I'd ~ The cesh OF
Il. H. Mems t justice, Of ;he Supreme Court.
Ihe Il siof cs- TIA, LIE Tas duy elected vacancy
1h- ea,o further a thst ioLry T. Dawes, without
leg warrant authority 'sht hes s!ne tho sth u tbfas
- ie, kd used aid SeIei,ca the tcs aid continues 20
Tie relaor further states that he desires TO prosecute
tin 10 be boast bJ the pv up'I his 'slan Tor tAe en,
Of estsb'ina I sat 10 he o;e sAd ha he hs m'de
iele,d s;pUa 10 the AZ oiuey General BE- p,intt7d,
So,t TO he s7poy,d By hs Aus,rey O.,
ia prosecute sctou and 'Let cenny the S.as
the OF econ, b. had des
10 the Attorney General bond tue atcency of which
ted sppIoy.d ny tim s'io spear fom tas paper.
ron bicn tho mott founded thst the Atornay-Ge"a
refused TO tomnene. ihs action tf TO clio" 70 Us pOscrei
la Of tho people Toe etai0 ssA-d i0T IN incs4H''
or and H. L. -toa tor rclaori J. h Porter tor
~ me c. Mt HARRIS, J-At the law but
the officers ihe eoa suo oe he TOT $40 ~niAn
II regarded the hs wIi. a rh' % b. sGod "a efe
WIT early cay Place to tne no'e Convenient
Iroceedn Of an iLonso IL tho nature OF qa watfano
t pecise CT the officers Of the crown to flo 4;ofni-
tons IL her cs dcietoo, upon tae aFp alton d ptyae
mgs Zee Cole Cum. Iuiorn Stons IN.
by IT, sct Of aid W. IAN and Nny ch "a which took
enc 1925 Information could 30 fea without .@Pess
orders, be g,on By the Court Of Kings Bencn III open
"eSa,t TIE ''sqte e Ii q - fssa "a H5
the riat.r should be ,ehcLed n te io'ma lou Ffom the
Les,ss o e a the r-lsto, n al iformsor, rstm,
QUO whether they toate 70 corporate office Or
after it was referred to the Court determine
whether an ,.arnsor MD f!s much
asor Of G. Sc to alba BE- Doe. In a-xv, 'arst,
f. 81, said b, Lord kecJon, Chez Jus i:e hat
when Lord Mansfield ca the Court Ito iund IA i-t!'
auna in Ct rEr'da,O w~fe had al aost for
sAus But he soon saw tne impoly ani y7Aaor OF such
uo ald re too:e be s,' aiy 'acu = i.aoI Ae
oenys.d the cae ana uss ne ts1Ld stfons s;und ,2t
- 10 et iho iotHs'lpI go Eye, sho .' Pc
rod been tao actce OF the EH.h Judges 20 e1-icse
top .ccoEcg the particular cumstanc-s Of tire case"
TIE ;i.cetnsry p9"eT "as vested IN me sape 40
n.h by s 81 J1n, aId n,ora.ti0r IN the nature of
oas ,a.Tano role speedy ad cctuA passed February g.
gs wss prCyoed that IN psrspu III
I'm iu6e il a. unlawf.y bold and execute aay Office
or he, within this snail aid may DO lawful to
snd ior AIu.y GLeIa with tho leave Of the supreme
Cou exhibit lie or moe fluctuations Ia tte NATURE OF
quo udrvdro toe relation OF pe-oa or persons dss
pc scue the slne, ho shan DO men med u ,u9h
30 Under hi, The Court exercised the sh, OF d7r
m!Ips wheth al ipoIHaHoh hou.a oo "9u % 10 10
utci ne gr,uui that The OF ne office dispute would
etlir, .4iore lie 'ghc could BE- red
+, he Revised Statutes 1870 this Discretionary was
witfaiewn rm tito Court, and vstso IN tho Attorney
quo arrarso ray Cleo IN the suIo Court OF tint, Sate,
b, the Attorney 5en,ra se ss n'iyiHa. upon ms ora
splyns Court for lay, WAN eny poroa shall nsuep,
'e' S. So 80. re saae provision is Toe sccea ia tas
I'D section e cOdo. L. for tso At orney Geoersi
.cJ rot Ito Cout dicine whether 10 p,f'Ic liar
case Is Iroter h, acton to try the sh: to a. ehcs
sh, lid be brought q not ...e.....
hat a.e4on Of the Legislature uaLsfer tbs
exeIc,o Of his dsereti.n tho CoGi t. IL, A'neyGsn'
er I'D tits no, VIC The 1"c' ne hat a. nee con-
ID, ring At,orDe era to e formation 70 try tie
light 70 .ecS lave ,'t5'b be R@' as az
tssst corporation. rs ,S, q, Gods ~ i5o Ia the
cecduss oens 9'a"ea By toe SnP'e Court or
Tee in the language of TIE statute which n1i
Gates intention The Of the Les hen dis
Isns with re necessity II sppyis to the Court Tor leave
ce,liny he J. ID Diam think that it was Ia
tac of eseb case a. should presented bai d-erHns
whether rae pSole teFest requires that i hoaid % Pr,
acton ct l. 8 well IN torn, an action %
s s' b. d ht IRE Ss4 Vice. duy
1hs Of statute to- g 81 iided An action ay
rover ne;cly eoi,ii- It .,S ha 70 deter ils ~hsthet
IL Ga. psscLsec A, 10 eyeJosa o vac UI IN a.
t. :e thou a it el1,Iiy i1vo!yes t.s e' 70
Ly an acticn In ,De Vi :he peo.l, II
tubc pres. institute Az colc uctel oy s o4oo pros
Il, q 10 Ccu. to control 10 author
& private P 20 assume his otSe d IL % H4Hi' 10
nay sr sd rsrh p tn, very eass that With
chow Off sh to al Office parry gay De enrf' 70 1s
,o.sib tat c.,es my silse which the .bns irhasoa
a. PER-. :. TO- iaI: lnssi asce 70 1de4,s
one stion 9fsc Ct 1e Legslau e. not tns tbs
ON creed bust exit As have seen. Is
sometimes vested 10 The Iou ana % times N ne
|
Ley ers with this deTeuCn. us office oi trH't
IL egel Ition bs will do his diy TIA q Il
eat with .f.ct iunarisy "a IL. ceDlie1so b. Ls
endowed with ccret not o1l7 n cases se us bnt
cher pubic concern 1sc exsIss Of 'Hh ects'
tou TO- Larre uticG, act, f!o Whch t~fs 3 a, sp'
teal and which Cus, hays ecut.1 1ae motion of
u AZ dAnus must therefore Se tei.c.
SUPERIOR COURT -srrNl.L TaaN-Aus 22-B-'''e
JU.ge LUER.
MUM IIO1-QuEs IIoH oS ThE POWERS pf Inn
CORPORATION
he second ayelus Rar.sd Comply sgt JoserA B IAyo
Street Comu issl ntr. -.
In this acttn tie plaintiff asks pertetua! inlunc-
ton rsuh;taIs The defs Dat ter Isne'I ne ,l' .o
liy third street.. The CIotoa Aqcee-e pera.n'
oouIac,ed e.. tie building q sever u sesl = 500
cost ac.S. cips i in ec.st4s. Z 81 It - -
ttrtt IL s-ue sithcrt h1ir tbs tntEs usT g. 'te -
"a ham tie,ossr ieeD o3-a fen nit-.t 49, -
co. tgssse 4 he rts q tte III TINS ftise' 81 'n'
Cor - c rsss c--t< az "a. s.ts5. ,
rs mi - orssti1 "a cnsc tSe y .iYfs ICE. V
'-tle1 sss-t- "a, tho SEQ
let = - u-is' ., ~, ds "ls.'"''
| vasi.s-st -., ...D.- ..,.s 4 IA, ih.