New-York daily tribune., 1856-02-29
Lori Clacendon 70 NJ. Cromp.ox.

No. 252l FosEICN OFFICE, Nov. lC, }jj
SIR In MY dspatch 10 vou No. go, of the 2d int.
iuco.ed the copy 5f di.psi,n Nr Marry which had
been read and placed my hands by Nj Buchspan.
BE- proper 70 atse that when il ne by Nj
had no co-IIaHce q Mr. Marcy dspech Of the 5h OF July
You and atca ny Observing hi, to r Bachsas be s,d he
lad not thought necessary to COZ nancaie 1t 70 oT
l. had reached him b. had received my mote OF the 10Th o
which be hoarht would finally settle lie question that hsd
sT.aen between the two Governments.
Her Mses,ys Government shared the opinion of Mr. Bu
olsDsn They did rot doubt h. the flank expression o. their
for any violation of the UHted satesaw which,
rsry 10 he siT-tons might have taken place ard ot their
determination ell for ir her complaint by put
scioly and hon6raby teimnsed difference between
Governments whose duty msintain the friendly rela
sse hsTTy sgss,:sd between Great Britain snd the lifted
states But this expectation la. been disappointed and
the Government Of hs Uued States her Maestys Govern
nen While they fully appreciate the inen y mSties which
ed Mr buchanan. disposed gret that he
Withheld the dispatch Of Mr. Macy would have called
their attention 70 AGAINST hch the United State.
Goycn,ent thought itself called upon remourate ani
which would have been inquired into, her Mesys
Go,eue. in matter which concerned he OF the nited
state. scupuiouy desirOus ,hst JUST for
aini should arise.
This disfs;ch however which NJ Buchanan has given
cory, her with A Msrcys dispsreh OF the lSth Of De-
tober have been considered with al the that
tvs Government shall endeavot to exclude discussion
tie subjects which fSre1H 70 the question imue'ey At
issue and which sht lead 10 irritation and this conTse will be
The mor roIeI =: ssT MAs.is GS.eTppei observe with
framed IN TIE tone OF hostility which Characterized his uote of
tie sth Of September 20 you.
officers ami afeuts Of her Msie.iys Government
F,f That they have within the United ststes territory in
frnged the United state. law snd
Sfoosd That they hsye violated The sovereign territorial
rh's Of the United States By being engaged recruiting
r the Brsh within ;hs United States territory.
Now viii respect 20 both thee ohaxes have 70 observe
hat The rOruAion posscfsed BY her Government
perfect ard thai definite character has been
-d By the dispatches Of Mr. Marcy inssmueh individual
British ofsr named and particular fset time
place stated and 10 therefore impossible
h either 80 eeu.-d y Mr. Marry vha, the charge
ne uescs o. ~ha Is the evidence which be
Her Msley's Govern rlert have Of knowing Vho
are the persons really indicated By the words officers
And eSents OF her Nslesfys Government whether such
sous those who lhsvr been under trial the only
nesnt &c be charged 4 not who else be included.
hat evidence against them relied apon BY United States
Government
l. Is TIVE that and her Msesys COn<s personally
earsed n hr Alys note OF the 5h Of September
bur the YOU nor they al lded in Mr. Mrcys dispatch
of October 18th 70 Mr. buchanan which might
by have been expected II IL reilly BE- the intention OF The
usd saies Uovernent to charge them with being
slefsetor shelfered from convctonH 10 oreA IAN
srsse OF the tnI'ed States Attorney Gener.!L
Ihe must therefore, the United states Govern ment
70 make end establish dsnct charges with proper spec
seson against particular individuals BY and hat Gov
nneDt Will eorfdent, deny the justice snd the
erify o syns each PtFsOs implicated the opportunity sf