The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-23

soo payable An Ten equai iasiaimsn fur winch Wig
which mortgage 5000 by
another held BY and remaining wig
aid 'ss .. % s sd % 1ss .S. sso hs haya .S
aio jadsm, q, aud sold at she 20 Fossn ehs.
paiy fsa prnei sheriff. ss his name
Sss s.sa ~ I as sa aiI % ns ns 9ny
ughs Of the eompaina and the defendant dog- pro-
gu cksivsr mine on said rancho
- . Da S"r 1 % s Gsaasups Mining
May lew py"us 10 The ns, iuuos OF III. AFORESAID Of
and s,s orsd s"mpay ,"i wo,Iss ssa Su.ss
ssI. IL dss . :'s sa ,d ana a. as
said bad no n nocs bu, ae,ae personal
Eiddss 1s owners either n- WHOLE or neay The
@ 10 On % 81 q % s 81.
c"nusss, Ia The sui before Unea in Cali
Tsa z asd Il
a. sa hs United nlSs, o aae 6y
aya nun, the PreenlA ion Of conflicting CLAIMS before the
Laros prosecuted
me name Of SAID fs.a i eeins usae,aoa thai he .ha and
Anh said Rose o said n look active
fossa The drsndan's
aa aaS ns, sd & @ .n
vested absolute e IN said Fo1s aud They
sry tSs Aa"e States and sa and h" has naos and
% 81 maze s. to do ;o 9deL ,ss ae, Of
California the conrmanons BY by
as v%s sess III.
ns from Goos BY deeas suosequsn, 70 'hs
hs OF me las
.sis lsHi S, on b
Il. as
are violating their agreement with said Rose concerning The
eompsiDan, sssn him from soSsy using ss properly
@ ls" $ I'D. Va al s % Il e: a% q o
now stands ~ the name Of and = vs.ted Edds proper and
IN aa at s s' had oesn a b."
renee that ,hs claim should be in hs name Of
such agreement The soarmaion the OF Foat ha. been
a s s aaS
io,ns The Dill shas that ne sai Eddge . to oh
drawing ad appeal ard Thu 70 obtain patent in The Of fs
and h or ne De d m sao
Tie oihr in fraudulent violation Of the aforesaid ageem'nt
e m % 1 % hs n, eanHo. som ms%, o % & e "a sa
GRAY ci.rn ., vss bs has failed 70 itgaie The matter ~
0Dsd district Caiorns
hss. a,is. ss derived eS%P'.a.a and ...
iisn caot VIE 70 ss % and Cray ,Ss o
sns ass he
81 Sas y f . s's. and @ .a @
ad the date said compainant aad
ausd q, nnass IN proper auna. Including
s s saa iaas 90
hmng rejecting Iains bors them The complainant ent
least that hi rights should be projected under the
Und 7iaes BY being Peciay excepted In any patent that may
issued hat said rights be de- reed be charge said
that patenee BE-
deereed complainant,
hm palent shni Issue rights the
properly recued under decree o IBIS court 1h
bill Injunction Restraining The defends EldIdgs
Fst from selling said iand, from disturbing tt
,neof &c sc and from v'oiains
agrepept With R-e the ef-ct TO be-
The BIN aro thai he Hon. Thomas
A. sndeks Commissioner Of hr Land Once, may be en"ned
issuing niins de'yspg patent To tne ed Chaes
in bis vo unu the d.fsudans this bill,
further order Of and fr an order OF pub
Iicaioa Attendants The bill for
from Cok 10 Tsy and Cray and said uda
Novbsr ~, Iss valid and bind ON said Law
rence Edrdse presads any their
Cray. afoe.aid entitled The srneh
aforesaid The
nights anebo sranird BY the from
End that said L-u~ncel klddre, and
he o'drrrd reeonvey % uh Of the nFe ue sod
inory, ornsy conveyed by Cook Tsy
should patented the OF
r,e- prev DUSTY 70 LnaI lscsan Of The ,suss.
md SAID Henry Lanreneet
fossa William Wsgns, The briD of lAm.P jones' nd
tdents
complainant by cnu- copy Of hts order
psbbed hespa2sr Pubished !" the city q WISH
ingon twice week sI weeks before th
Eandy October notice to the raS aossa DE-
and Of said n and them 10
apprar IN by solcor, bef 20 thc said
csuse apy hy why decree ought NOT prayed
otherwise, the will be taken foe e'nsssed,
BY order Of Ihe
T.uI JNO. A. SMITH, Clerk.
True ecpy-Tes,s Jso A. SMITH, CLERK.
June e6-aawow