New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-03-25
Law IN7ELLIGENUK.
INTERESTING TRIAL poR DIvoRox.

presence of large number Of specators the isseese
in the case seeming TO increase as its sev~nsaisu
approaches. Mrs. Cox was present as ussal VIII q
number Of lady frends, and who seated 81 ~
side within the bar.
The court opened at III O'Clock; and, a4er tAv
names of the Jury called, the following eysdesee
elected for the defendant:
Rsbeoca Sherwood, sworn-I have known Mss. Cen
.SS y.i. and nT;sy % Ter Y'ar rs ~s': =. ssss -
street 4, is.s her ProsssJ Nv. Or ,hrss tine: s:a: 80.
Is oa, who BOARDED with bsr mouths ssA v
school nav, s.n bar brown yaa iesseaay - %
calico dre. p'a "a y0sae. shaw, OF se.d on che - -
husband and bis AGENTS. my accompanied ~
r.Ssr; my nsdea Io.s lived q H.'srsss..
Roeki.Id Co have lived hsre ssees y.sst arss.
az Dr. Anhon different places Learned uy Ais In SessnA
mits M Ten ss
Cox sI came here she lived in Ls, ing .,ssss
straw When esms to The city did whsrs -
lived, thitk fr hes sser came 70 the atty e M
Ms Cox I.o Nina Cox and my essins, hsss
kIO~s dsiendsn, to live snywhs,s es e.esrs Ss.
her bora is2s; my name Peer Rsss9
Ieft March, 1855; Mrs Cox been my hssss wAss
have her black her bonnet, and hAss
Twenty eond street previous to that lived Ne AS
street iheyer called on dena.n. sss - We
they coming out Of Church . -.
sos s hss house cS. IN So Mar, place sis.s.sa & I
Epsois Church -.ae tod me that she was ws,sasd
cSsn isss person csnaos Se co@nancsnt q the Es1s
pa chsre without .he rate Of bspm and cannot b nspaes
that little after her husbands desAI wss :ens
,G l Sa Ss S sss5s and ss aSs
the rite of ap,ism had known them previous 70 A
csec the Mission Church yis the SICK Whenever am oasl
rife The th.pt
the settled rector Of Calvary Chnh hs no, called ese
in March 1885, was church; do not know that s
Rev. sir Southland had returned then- -
entytwo property the Vicinity Of srss
Csrune and rented to Mr. Senior, the unacak;t
lived in the house then
How long have you known h%t !, Sewers; ,o.~
Mr. Stouehtea objected TO the Question.
Some yeats; ever heard any GOOD Of him
9 Whs, = his general 81. character us A. rs bad
Cuossexamined-My business years bossussk
ihaye lived at 10 xs yMck street SINCE 1882 pss y
little over six years. used 70 pop IN to see Mr. scae hss
do nc tno% any Of Aye he ami base nes
kept conp.py have spoken to Ayres oo many times ess
Tor Wilson had hands frequently, never know u
Have so, ever heard SPEAK Ayerr A. Ihsve
in hes baye heard wife aad daughters and tho cs
O. TIE persons your house the only personal A g.
nos soy So never had any differences with Ayres.
daughter who have spoken of Ayers A. cannot say.
How long since have heard person speak q bin.
O. Have you been provoked at Of hi. boy ps.A
close would rriher be excused from answering thst Lknoi
would believe him under oath he has provoked ~
Ill Of him the Craig; heard ii d
women in tho house speak IN the same manner Of him Asy ~
O Did Ayers wofs with Senior in 1901 A. He worked Asse
Elizabeth Hawks swon,--I married lady my A.sss.1
knew Mn Cox when she Kept boarding house in 81 Mad.
Of Shia I yG ,'.n hso's a: ass; Sin
Q, Did she alone A shs did
O Did you Mrs. walls A. She gen
orally black vail and sometimes she wore brown 81.
which ne wSua , o sf oIss s wssn sss 's %s
r. md 1Su%sPy aGa o = s SS tho
Dd she manifest any 'ecrs'y IN the wearing ss~ vaAs
ID s aSiY ss wear calico dress
there III at hOmeI heard she W. SIGH in In
took when shs had been at Mira Gsassi She called
hsIe one 5 IN me month a of June sS he'd s''a -
Q How was Mira Grah's from your house, A bsok
O Did she bring child with heE9 A. She somstrss ssscA~l,
small boy named Thompson with hsr when abe called q
Cross essminea7o What is your husbands bs4'nsssi A.
he has q 81 Washington
O. Did you MIS-. when lived with decsrs
A. did Mr. Cox called In the Fal Of 1851 my houss
June 1855 Mrs Graf evidence called the fact To- my mns
abe called requeny and took tea and frequently esnas 1851
Graf now i've si No. iss West TRrssh street,
James N Murray swon-Am Clerk at the second District
Have you psper with you charge ssanas Dr. Cor In
MI GersrdI offer to that in 1882 charge
sssnst Dr. Cox before Judge sar for making kse adAv
which occupied xix months In Investigation. and t there
other Hnhsppness defendant,
angry controversy betweea her and her husband ownse
O. Was there nves charge Of perjury sssia
O. When was L made On the l5s Of October, bs6ous
Justice Stuart; the Investigation continued July 1864
q Did Mrs. Cox attend with the doetori A She did
complaint dismissed; there was -
witIess called tor the d~fense the affidavit In LANDLORD
@ there question alto whethsr the statutes msds
tenancy ia a. r 81 ISs bs
express wish VI d.. Coz A recoect that be
ous TO have II tried on several OCCASIONS when was proposed
NJ Grsrd offered read evidence the eousspondsscs
Mr sshsssr objected de aid !. va. q no inposssass -
TIM. though they night b very insrestns to heal.
of the plaintiff which he sought %
plaintiff and did sniI.p him into msuass and sas -
TO dsproye PIE rspudstsd becssss o.
sdults hs offered thsm also. to that Dr. Coz kss~
M stOushson uk.d the ssunss prsssnded 70 ~ list X
Cox knew her w.yOu, chsrsser and that he knew h q IL
guilty other misconduct If similar character But6
give them the Opportunity 30 show her life previous f>snA
he Court ruled hat tSey could % into any tssss
Of r.. e s # Deterrent ~. sa e c
libel shieh bad been PerpstIsted 81 the eozuss N -
MI sehsscs ssid he thought wrong too n eosna n
's NJ. Gerard said be wosA reyssstue changes sx.p.
Mr. sehsssr said that An GssaA was The only was