The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-08-02
In Equity. No. iI5,.

M.
s bill ongipai, died In This cause Jobp b. Gray was
panan but was aefwad, by leave OF The court made defend
fhs substance " original amended and mai b,
lled In the eaaxs y as solio@si - ~rrr'"i rr' w
governor Of 10 one Jus,o Laro Of esSa ne
inc Jurisdiction Of San Jose Guadalupe Upper Caos"a
ue and perfect legal title diatey passed. with definite
hn s ~ sad Laos assgns
g after .e dae VI said giant was in complete lhe
one Grove U cook eonvo sepen
be os a ana day ssS,deS saa @ Grove
April is copy q which hed exhibit O. con-
their hss and assigns IN the proportions said Tay
iof sna wo % 2 said Cray all ,hs mn's ncus
any In which last ad Cook aud Lark were
said rancho within in said
anee together with tight way
Cray which were needed fo carrying aso land sui
M seeus woas anS building al
mines; and together with all the e interest, proper
same In said conveyance
rs asa, any
cu,ed and duly IeeoIdsd The oh Of march, which,
coa,eyanee 70 have beeo dated Apr is4s.
B ae" 81 Ssy on are s ns Ss
2s Of March, 1850 between Taylor city state OF
Virginia Jane Sis wie q he one p Di and hs
s%a e s 81 aS II hs o. GOuaa
ms asclaaon Of In.t states that
and Sssi "s aaa s ssnss aa%ss a% %
Ss 49, ,s Cook nc Ss,
Ey aa .wo @ oher No, il this suit II
in said ha, the le lands mines minerals and
oss and os things purchases
IN the name Of Taylor and Gray
ais and ores and that each party ownership
nave wen declaration Of his interest and portion by
isspeeye WIVES conveyed TO the Taylor
thing. which, Inc sad Sssn con-
veyed g said Taylor and Cray be held by complain
the and oter h Il said DECLARATION Of iru.
Ta % sps9nss s ). hs
lands and Other things described convey
eh q The Interested total four bum red aes
Gray By Rossr, soesoa ~ a. ss jn
~ oy Lewis y Levin 20 and by James Branerd Tay
he said estate @Ss mns es ans
parties wa. to be Conducted BY said
trustees OF majority Of hem their &c and they
business, be Fixed by helsyes The relaS
property been nee changed sevs ,hen
a ~ kaoe 70 e who now owns large portion
so and ,hs dsy q carrying out the oec,s the
om GSs o. eo" sSa ,aa G5a s SURVIVING The
Sy and y one lanes Brsu.rd Taylor agent Knowles T
e e9mp.naa' nor he feels quite certain, John b. Gray,
Ss, s osa James Taylor heard
from iaIios ln April May s4s. afer purchases
Banead Taylor who agent o. Knowles Taylor
sohn s Gray. ha. the dsnau, Wssia. made claim Of
Banerd Taylor, Cook denied any
aon before mentioned conveyance
s & oe's s, ssa e ss
aud dd nS object to H. nor ss-er, opposing cnm At later
interest The rancho with Cook looked Cook aone
and sequescd the ae made by Cook Taylor and Cray
Taylor with both Cook and Wigens they repeatedly assured
to aud Cray and James Bsasd Ta,io cona
ding N Then Representations permitted wisrns live the
Wgns Afer the departure Of James nranerd Taylor sens
pors by him n,o habits Of Gll he be
came confirmed drunsad make dated 4 June
&C. q .d sneso q nc sls ipas $50
s together sih ms two sougse one o whom was Jane.
the uird Judicial district Of California sitting county o.
from aes 10 Toe Of for Cook and
se ,a tor Wssns hs s,d Gums Were , pad
between Cook and virgins that Cook should hold The ue IN his own
April s4s, Cook sale Taylor and Gray hereube
ss sa h T0 M ad Cray We. n Goos 30
that Taylor and Gay guilty Of fraud ~ the usnsse,on ths
the time ofs Cook wggn. Lao. Virgins
soos e pops and se, since eo.nnsd 70 me poe
oners Weller and Jones, the legal owners, under Virgins
scnhed Ia deed Tsylsr Cray The petitioner.
decree annune The deed 70 Taylor and Cray s % 't
coVsy se, &C Ksowes Taylor CaBornia, hed
denying all m srgaions except the allegation a. TO the ,ae b
Cook 70 Taylor an Cray of The ne. mnea ores s In ,sid
% s on S & 'ns s % ws s s
made for transferring this suit the district cou Of The United
States fo the northern district Of California, bad been demanded
transferred proceeding.
sac district ior the northern district of California, which
set out in this h that the llh November sS made the
following decre,;
Uritsd Diria coHr Dtae er coyorrtG
"''''''' wst.t'' and 'osF'' r,0,, noc,..
r.r1or sas ss os.r, ''"'' Decree
Th coming heard stipulation Of parties BY
ther respective solicitors on he on The e answe and sIhbs
dcfed adodd aad deeed the said matters and hing. SCI
forth ibr been duly verified by oat and no
replication flied iheeio BY the compninhnt be deemed and are
and Of lease forth in said answc
TO te said deeodan and their agns and gsnees be- and he
panans And u further ordered andEd and deeretd hai
the said Of the sad property describe IN the deed. nom
foh IL answet be- hereby
against sd ooapansni- and s, The properly herc descbcd
Ana he ,s,r ordered adndgd and dseeed by The con
said John a. Gray and June hs wife said knowes
y. Stockton, Macy Lewis O. Levin, and James Biaed
Tayo Of the several rights set
tu.,s hsrver on re part or ofhet
and that fn perfect and valid ubng us 70 the said
Ana n further ordered sdjndred and dccrecd
veyance said from Grove Cok 70 Jose
Compapy bearing date The January Is,s be- aud the
hereby, confirmed against tho snid oompisinan Tree from ~
claims Of the said ompiainani OF either Of them, by way Of trust
ordered adudsed and teeree th the lease set
forth said om Grove o. Cook % Iosc AsEc and hs
associates bearing the aih day OF lanuay ls be- ava e
hereby confirmed fee from all claims Of the said com
pnnsnts, ny Of trust or otherwisc
And Il fnher ordered adatscd and dccres a ss
hsego aud his nssoeaes ny I'VE SAG Ionn ~ ~, s,a H,s
Attorney John u. Cray and WIFE, heuring date he va Gay
the d ee om Of said complainant,
or either of hem by of trust or otherwise.
apcs se, etb in aid s.er rom Juso Grove
Cook dated The 5,h isa and ,ha assa s ne s