The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-18


which mofage =. % assigned b Cook the aesndan
another held by him. the remanins Interest Of said Wig
g said s sd Jaas ss Hsss SSa
sas and sold q sheriff sale 20 said tSssa The .hs
really principally shsnn his
shsIs,a eIosk and With New o Infringing and violating the
% ss and % so sa .a se
p aks q a @ mime o SAD
attempt gave 20 suit oIclbIe entry
May sSo 70 The Institution Of hs ,s o
aarence and formed working said quick
Il sa dusdsaSs Mining Company and
saa &c had no,
and Edage are The real either q the whole or nearly the
Robert Rose q lie counsel q The complainant and his
II as @ e , osa y sss s c M
United States board q land commissioners in California ef their
and in order 70 avoid possible and de-
na $ q % ams D. asS e m so
Laros claim 10 be before the board Of
sass asaa @ pa
board Fossa
lated their said and insisted that The said
eIy Aaaue states Earop- maae,
Ionsress q - March ss 70 ascertain and settle private land
The United s,as. court the ssnoh not q
Cook 70 Taylor and Cray are estopped from deny
% IT, s s ss es sss ss &C.
and Fossa sun on heir fraudulent geensons
nuiy aforesaid judgment. November
effect q said disturb the
Slo% on % @ Sa iii
that the legal title all the land confirmed in the Of Fossa
ss
Mer II posess d a s s had Sa
aa no. Inform .he o. ad Roses WIN Law
had said Rose consulted The abou.
appealed o% By the 1Dea and !. now pending on appeal
3 the United states district me dlae,
Auonss General
sai and Judicial controversy pending
en- him and n % ons e. side de- @
The advised that BY his cizenshp in the
he 1nS soa o@ Ms
Or s. ~ 1 ss ss ls e; s
sep. 20 prevent e injunction he issuing Of the patent,
e,rS nSs :. orSasd and are ounS.d
as d1.s' i. 10 Cecil al two s dss ss.;
March, as,snmens n puI,u'nss 81 rs thereof D.
Z s as sns a
February s by virtue Of this treaty and Of The LEGAL aes .
al Others cans under said Cock and wife en-
ied III umss and IN all proper n
By any ason Of he board Of land Of cnia
lied 10 obtain patent said Cray surviving s.
az @ has % s uaons and ss constitution Of the
United states being specially excepted In thai
said be dscreed 70 be charge on said
that such psentee may be
the complainant 70 reconyey 70
him. &e patent shall until the rights Of the com
pI.nant properly Of this court The
restraining The deendsns, bdrdge
selling said lands from disturbing e
thereof &c and rom violating
with said Rose Ing the true effect 10 De
The bill thai he Hon.
issuing granting. delivering 70 The said Charles
assgbres OF the connIpiaion made
his defendants have answered tbs bi
OF court, and for an order OF pub
against defendants The bill also Tor
Cook Taylor and Gray and said udR
November H. lssa valid and bind ns on SAID Laa
rence Edge and preclude claim ON their par 10
said complainant snd said
Aforesaid entitled 20 me benent
Of Aforesaid confirmation TO the
rights rancho granted by the eonyesnce from
Cook and Cray end that said surence tdudg and
be ordered ueh OF the rights tue md
originally conveyed BY Cook TO Fay
Gray should be patented IN the OF
Fossat ousIy the hnaI decision Of the cause
appearing tha The SAID Henry Ianence
Cbare- Fossa William Wsgns, The heirs James Jones' Nd
thsm residents OF the Dict
OF I7h day Of June, 1856, ordered
complainant by causR OF this order
District twice week for weeks before the
Monday October notice 10 the said absent de
said BILL and them 10
appear In by SOLICITOR before the said
fourth Monday the premises and show
caus they have, why decree ought not TO pass prayed
BY order OF the court.
JNO A. SMITH, Clerk.
True copy-Test; JNo. A. SMITH, Clerk.
June 26-2aw6w ...