New-York daily tribune., 1856-05-21
La W ZNI,EZLIGENCE.
COMMON pLyAs-s,,cr.L r,as-Ms, II.


John L. FAse VI. Noah Norris and Joha r. Psuisstss'
An cal from the judgment Of the Marine Cost
enter by order OF Q single Justice hos either to sss
General Term Of that Court or 10 the Court OF Osmr
mon Pleas at the election Of the appellant
Bys reversal of Judgment Of the Marine Count 10
the Common Pleas that judgmeat ceases to DO OF aaV
validity and an Injunction against proceedings thcrese
will be- granted.
IL ssms that no appeal lies from dectsicns OF he
N arinc Court at General Term.
IscRABAs, y. .J-in January, 1854. Norris oc@-
epced an sc,on against La FSse the Msae Coart and -
the us that Court before n .ssae, s.T,s. sssls -
s,o q sou,. ard lnSsIsu. Va. ss,'''s 'a''o'' -
Fsse duly appealed from such udsmen, 70 ,ne
.pS on The besrr Of such appeal hs Judgment In the csst
below reversed and uds nent OF reversal o. tore.
.saSn for the same Superior Court which .sasa
.h. .soys ',:.a prSsssias. no,,. .::
levied upon ituio Of plsnf In his resds.ees
aud re.tsns to remove ard .e the s.ae Tse .mus
restrain the defendants nom psooss>
No objection was made on this motion to the propro,y
srsutb u the plaintiffs entitled TO any reise
isoas Gssp Be- e S h. remedy .oio Ia. sp.
eeeedn By .sncoS b., case. . ~soTs nss a' s s.,
nom liability. and when tho plaintiff In the !sAS
mont irresponsible en- action would not any wsy redress
10 .Uch case ni there ;. doubt - 70 the ~
ss,,a uS,m,nt By Junction Of leaving him % sIs
st under tho provision ia rer.rd 70 ~
p ~ ders.d b. ft11s % e .ss s
Of .S 9d 1 % IN :.Ss ., .i s S mean: %
Hs him,sf against the collection Of judgment that b" ssss
Isis sufficient he-evsr s hi. ESQ to that 90 o.ee:s
S. y ss Sss .,e S & s o |
o are ..ss 10 ;Sp'S s ~. Z sS % ss css 'S .,ss:s s
t.9a 9lsd % ;, h CODE f Of .SsSss tho .s I
ensss he poweo q tho Marine Court has - slt:ssd u
ss .d 20 ss. jsasi rsfa f q hs S.as co",s s
hrsy The lac. p'O'icnt 70. appeal to this Court
,A By S;.1p +. s."s;s '' Of PROVIDING
70 1o %: .r Ss sssCs. c . Justice. Of tn. So
pr,ne sPte,l Tenn he.e question: We .sssse
.ss. 81 ,S. or, are rssd in tho ouon ,sss the o.
that can 30 .isn to .h Court to" s
BY the upon the .i OF the and that no sRpsa
Los this Court iron dsterinsos Of the General Ts'
TIE deeiol. to .hh eisned in the Supreme Cst
% ss. made Of ~ ia Se G.S.s f.rS Tas o.: va
~ JU.tiee rs.lsdy .1t The ''As, NJ P,s.. ta'.ss =.
rel Fi..nlers w Ths Ju.iiess Of the M.Iios Css-t.
2, AGSI Ss n.ia. IT, &C. codS, granted new @ ssly
question tbe ee..on of hat motion wss wsstss
order III. decision to the right q sppe: g sh. Ccsr
,td bs node Of such -s no; ness.., s1a -.
e.es hse ven FsT'sa o. one ss Of the Js.,.sss
rrpue Court ard the order 4sds By ar Justice Gelss s
ard 2tbte.Pr c.. 20 Js...s Coys. ... 70 ,ss ass
uEder consideration. and 20 opin'0H ~" esp'-'a
In si1r c.., Of Tns People re. Debsasesa sst oss
Cik Sc Br Justice Cleric sssin sdop.ed ne ssns @
~ h s s.s.i. Term q bs Court he ...sa. =
oaber then ,b-e oIpr-sseo y ep - sh. M...
Ths PeoTie e1 Fsaners sss tbs Justices " 'n'
vs,,S 4, Se ssrreme this question sad -s ". re-
i.eve6 therefore .r, saes,rsas, s co.pt os s,s
s.sf .ysf.e 70 TIE hes'ocrs srP'es'si " 'n' ~"
'A,Ison: .,s thar the decision. Of the sap,sns c:sa
S cosfroi tEI. Court until tie sane have bee"
the Court d Atis, that aDder any circumstances suet
,S is Ils eject The decision Of s.ns a'nes H..fs
collateral tI ea . 81. TOE Ise. l.s tbs jod.d
$40 ~ ~ coat os spf-. TOE Inferior Courts of tas
~ - b,s Cort ooot1i1sts 9th the ssgres, Coat n
e,,, blousht therein, AID he deei.ons Of 70, Court us
-. ., e. ,b On eject oow from the decisions of the
sfr me Cour' Eepers ie'ni In esse- vhes .se
hue tie srprsE1e Cou't hai spposs J1fsdieuss
EVER he esesoi Court have Jslasd % tho ees.
rs IA sset bat have never ocosnsa th'ss aso
"a. a. kaviLs 81 fur Ia ocBtrC.
And he sCprsns CoaIt have sl0gesa . similar ru.-ksS
IoIS. ". D-s. L~~sof s. c. r., 81.
Pf.sba- pss.ss. of The act ~ S ssssoa Laws, -
rs h.Is dOsbt he eossuaease of As
pIos Of tbs eots 0f posdso regulating sppsss hss s
That s.sis that The sg,esl .A. Be- taken fra. ss
.. 4. 2usn. en t< J.e. O. ~ Cii and on tss rssSss
By Is TO s Js'tss the costa sId the f's toe mai
Ttsr. Or. sso c,ksr pro,Ons sLoviss that the Lsssws
ih eontenpsec that the Ifoeeeds or sppes wS -
srs rel csr,d he ucsusnt ,h.r k ao.s w 70 make the -
tun fault that h< ai1n> % be Dooss4s1
90. .nens .uv. tss S% sss O. reno, = fen q:
State ksp the Aptese Court examine wtne ostA
and has removed 10 sny other county ~ maj b eSmnsS
o sks ths return.
10 o... any yovsioa u.as for rstura By sny oa-
Jutcs than The ~bo rel cered the Jsisp.eSt
soeh sslee must return ,bs and ess ms
r,p..ssa n d. s.cosa ,sisns q z snitss G. vsA
~ unde0eaea . sov " lreo.