Virginia free press. (Charlestown, Va. [W. Va.]) 1832-1916, 1856-03-20

The SSs<v Of he te.h Hast tsks- sseepIsa .
oaf sf'sste %. AiilArd rai,ssrr, vsses ne gaze
70 cur rssters ~ssk. ago. We 90 "a, rssps,e TO
sa.rsriA e Spt>d ., ,ssg'h fss ne do no. ihiak a
@sf"s ssy other has tsisf sosiee. We pa.
saaAssd Ne shsrse Of AbsisSesi-a against Mr.
fdinSe 'disxssesisl sissasr.- sad ~ rep<ss
'ss ssssa hsse. Oar laDsssxs did nat bear more
epoo The Ses,a. tAss spea Ne esksr Asti-Anssi-
eAs resssss ihf,eshsai the sosih. wssi not &C.
sase The sSsnf 81 s'srt.nx tho seessatios; ne do
80 ssss s-s-ee u cess. sad care lees. Tie
fiss fises sdsis sAst he Fs..mosel wrote ,hIs let
Ter IN ie5s" We sausit no .och sAiar nesittr
DO ss Sshy q. Cor We have no rref either var -
Wee,s>iI'f a imaasnai xhetherit IL ssm usd
desse. ssd DO, caring about n one var or sso,h-
sr. Ne cd pSfsAPs Admit II lsr the sake VI arss-
arrt
We did not pfonounee an; sy<ciai verhaiin
statement u Tie Spsris, Islander, ~kaierer ne
nay have iaooeht lot We did, ard DO say that The
s,,sa attempted 10 produce tie Impression ppos
. people Of J~6rrsoa. that Mr.. Fillmore va. IN
ssiai on rhe srtiset cf Slavery. Tbis Il vas
vhish ss PsSaosssei al graceful slsrdsr.r ssa
vsst v- sait thea ws repeat se~
he Fne Press. riAsH a. sr.sx tat tiis i.Esy
Nd srrr bres rsessisd psoaoasce- this staiemrnta
SANDER, ard . misrepresentation" Do, ihr SIR
sbihs shi. 10 ART We did show thar sus< 20.
sssiai'ss Asi sass sirss ID Maasl r.zasrs,s al.
ss-isi'-iig.. We ssst 10 az re ssfsz c--.-
hea. Doss d eves expect IN ssialn sration, 20
deal Nth The qsesiioo OF Slavery more fairly than
did Milisid Filmoiesi Was rcr hs. admini.ua.
uoa al least as far asslasefy va, son,sInee--a all
tAsi the scesh etalt issirsf
Tue Sps6. does Got propose 10 baaiy epi,hs;s
u'ih The Free Pfrss." We are heartily Glad 10
hear f., Tor VIC ,hopid Infer a uaissrsHs a.Gs a. in
thar Lac. We esnaoi meet The A.ti-Am-t,esp
peas ~ten they get TO calling band aan,.. They
learned that Accomplishment ls.i Spsiag to The n.
hee saisfae,ioa q oar gssasasHly g6refasr.
We AK the readers &c ihe F,ss Peas VIII, n 4,
the most esjse;ioaabie Y.u are esi.iy q dlsrrase
iai s'sader.@ % Yen infrnsi Godless Ch fi,,e-..
louxy. usitosous, ,kalzihs, asi.le-.H ".
VII spare our readers any fei A.; io.a ten. freu
'as 'hsS'e anfye niiemsniy expsess Ton. whey oar
sc.-e9 GSsethor and The foreign rtcs. have hsap.
&C uron the heads II sereH,y Ave ihonsand Wiz.
siHIsns. vho were too honest aud too ind, pendent
10 eseoGs The DiSlors q iienfy A. Wise. Our
course Il plain zoe. We ihiak that he proper
xfoahd Of HewsPsper controversy 10 argument
"geGsiemaSiy rtiosi. aud ssIeIsn.p
We have bat zoe word more to say upon this
srtIceL The SsSi week or two ago said xe
bad 'ts3 esF'sirss, seal ssds. sss siais % a r.r-
~ ~ e'~t<7 cos-s rearga&ss.' Does isis come a,
- 'ls sSs'fs "iesa Of ssntifmaaiy re,or aad
AsFeassa y Its quite tune foe the foreign p.e.., 10
abandon The showers 81 epiti cts which l, used 10
tstv'tiss'ihg SHAME. s'iovef Virginia last spfiey
We take IL that the American party {, quite as
gsSiiemanly a. sSy oGhef IN The Uaion-and q
Eo'd-teal more 50 than some. We have ALREADY
Consumed mere space Ihsn we defended ard we
eose hi. etiiotial ~ilh the assurance 10 The S,r
that We viii uevsr dePSn ZEN What ws esteem tae
dsiy Of gesIeman.