Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-03
CASES AT JANUARY TERM, 1885.

he term:
AIRY TERM, 1885.
l53 Letcher vs.. Hudson;
lH Lowe vs. Slean;
i55 Moore VS.. Hughes;
l56 Merritt VS.. benson ct al;
ii5T Shacklett vs.. Gilman;
Il5S Stewart vs.. Edmondson;
1859 State Of Tenn Use &c vs..
Fussell et al;
100 Tresdway 4 wife We.
Goodwin admir-
t6l Wallace vs.. Ackiin;
i62 Thompson trus. vs.. Tenn.
and Ala. Railroad %;
1853 Williams vs.. Glover;
"a Beatty VS.. Clodgeiter;
65 Tillman Va Williams;
t6R PetWsy vs. Wilson e; al;
81 Dunn vs.. Kreider;
t65 Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
Co. W.. Marlin;
l6S Shute W. n i @ Railroad
Co;
20 Ewing trustee ys. same;
III n 4 c Railroad Co Va.
DoGelson.
70 Lsnier K Falls vs.. yanller
70 Livingston vs.. Nash. Gas
Light Co;
"a Gilmzn va. Wright;
l75 Lanier i McNickle vs..
Vsnlier;
T6 Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
II Young vs.. SuramerhIll;
IS Corporation Of Nashville
vs.. RayIord;
.lS9 Same vs.. Higgins;
$50 Same We. Raiford;
ls1 Sam vs.. Same;
'iS2 Same ". Hamilton; S
lSS Gof vs.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &C.
Iie4 Crutchel vs.. Foster.
IS Childress vs.Mammel ct al
iS6 Csntrsl vs.. Sloan;
IlsT Doe. lessee, vs.. Waggo-
.lSS Brigham vs. stratton ct al;
lS9 Same VS.. Craighead;
1870 Same VS.. Havs ct al;
1871 Baechus vs.. Porter;
'l99 Bosley vs.. WEIGH
1893 Cole VS.. Mayor and Al.
dermen of Nashville:
l94 Davis vs.. Bradley;
1876 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee, vs.. Hin
ton;
81 Glover 4 Boyd, use &c,
vs.. Colett;
les Goldberg / Co. vs.. Insu-
rance Co.
l99 Harris vs.. Pitts;
200 Hays VS. Edmundson et al
901 Horn and wife vs.Stewart;
2 2 Leilyett 1 Ewing VS.. Mills
4 EgGn;
.2O9 Hollins vs.. Ryman ct al;
204 HslloWell 4 Co. VS.. Hume
.205 Hammond 4 Co. vs.. Lu-
cas- ct al;
.l06 Housley vs.. HsgAn ct al;
.207 Hoke 4 Bro. ". Jackson;
2OS Hamwell vs.. Telegraph
Company:
200 johnson vs.. Noore ct al;
p 0 James a Co. vs.. owen ct
al
III Insurance Company vs..
Peck tt al;
llt2 jenkins vs.. Bush ct al;
l2i3 Kerby vs.. Brockwsy;
ia Linsry vs.. Bridge Co.;
els Mckinney vs.. Shelly;
I2l6 McCampbell, trustee vs..
Hicks ct al;
l2l1 Same vs.. Mari;
l2lS Mcintosh vs.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
I2t9 Nara vs.. Insurance Co.;
ig2U Malloy vs. Turnpike Co.
lz2l McRoberts ct al vs.. Jack
son;
POO Oldham vs.. Paul, eX'r;
lz23 Petway VS.. Crutcher e; al.
l224 Pope VS.. Washington.
4th week.
I225 Mining Company Vs.
Mitchell ct nj.
I226 Murrell VS.. MayOr and
Ald'mn Of Nashville;
l22I Minneit A Wincoop vs..
McCombs et nj;
I22S Morgan 4 Co. vs.. Wick
house;
229 Mills VS.. Stewart;
l230 Mart u vs.. Beatty;
I23t MUrrell 4 Matloek VS..
Tenn. 4 Ala. X 4. Co;
292 Owens vs.. johnson;
.238 Porierfield vs.. Beatty;
l234 Stewart 4 Go. vs.. Hume;
I285 Same vs.. Bowling;
236 samuels, by next friend,
vs.. Mayor 4 Aldermen Of
Nashville;
23T Shegogg VS.. Simms;
23S Wright vs.. Crenshaw;
239 Zimmerman vs.. McNairy;
240 Bank Of Tennessee vs..
Hampton ct al;
24t Camuse VS.. Patterson;
242 State Of Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson et al;
2 3 Bell vs.. WEIGH;
24i Guthrie and wife vs..
Rains;
PAS Jordan vs.. Davidson;
246 Porter ". Bergan:
247 Livingston vs. Mayor and
Aldermen Of Nashville;
PAS Barns VS.. Gilman;
'2,g Rains vs.. Williams;
700 Childress w. Owen;
25l Corporal on OF Nashville
VI. Hamilton;
252 Same vs.. II ggins;
.St8 Same vs.. finn;
25A Same vs.. Gurnand;
rs BalIentine W. Brown;
256 WoodfJlk vs.. N. and Q.
Railroad Co;
ISL Mayor & Ald'men Nash
vile exparte;
256 Mayor 4 Al ,'mn Of Nash
vile exparte;
259 0lds vs.. McRadden;
200 Campbell vs.. Crenshaw
ct al;
i2sl Corporation We. Moore;
262 Morrison vs. Graham;
s0S Same vs.. same,
254 Same vs.. same;
I26o same vs.. same;
% Same vs.. same;
81 Same W. same;
g PinkertOn vs.. Crenshaw
et al;
2fe Smith 4 &c. vs.. Same;
40 Same vs. same;
2Ii Same rs. same,
IZ72 fame vs.. same;
.278 Childress vs.. Hampton
Ct al;
.274 Jones W. Nance;
.e75 LeAke ". IiRrell:
.276 Frey ct 81 ". knight etal;
I'll Jackson W. bell;
27s Dodd W Henry 4 Skinner
ZTs Pope rs Washington;
2So Same vs. same;
Eel Same vs. same;
2sl Peck a Bliss Va Morton;
2s3 Pointer vs. Bell;
.lS4 Papin vs. YoiEot;
zs5 Peck vs. Carter et el;
tS6 Paris vs. Jackson:
lsI Seay, trastes " Tsrpley
& Pyle;
2ss shute vs. Bigiey;
2S9 stevens vs. Hamilton et al
29O Shute vs Had ~ et al;
y9l same vs. Williams ct al;
292 Van Dyke, adm'rys Pearl
iy8 wsldrol vs. Scruggs;
x9t WaTmoth vs Casey;
S5 WhitwOTth " SeAluny ct
81;
e6 Wesi " Brown;
t97 Warren vs Union Bank;
l9s Alsord vs. Scalcs ex'r;
2g9 Gleayes e. al Rdm'r vs.
BoEeli et a.;
500 Same v GoOdlett ct Al;
8ni fame vs East et a.;
3 2 Wis n vs. CaFter;
3e8 Whiteman vs. Carter.
SOt Lanisr a McNickle "
Ewing, Dick A Co;
THO. 7. SMILEY. CLERK.
for 1856!
+. q % 4 A N IS
l07 Nassau st n. York