The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-05
In Equity. No. 1851.


anan aerwSrd by of the court made defend
substance Gf original amended aud supplemental bills
Gled in the cause is as follows 80 ...
governor California aros Of certain lands situate in
Snomn as The Rancho de los BY Which grant
lutte and perfect Legal e s .ns as@ @ wH aspe aed s
complainant advised lha legislative action nor other proceed
ie thereby passing as Aforesaid Said
one Grove u Goe ds ~ S ao
of said aneo and Rebeeea his wife by deed dated on The id OF
veyed Taylor defendant John Bowie Cray
s @ 5 heirs a, S sd y m @ "eas e sa oe
worked by Forbes and not asndng The one worked b com
minerals known which might thereafter be found
on said ane ssa" % aaS Sna @ S aIsTSea Of way aa
grazing cae mules belonging said Taylor and
dsitn, o establishing smelling building ali ohe,
%nss and csssr with al he estate right o;erS proper
~ claim and demand OF said Cook and @ wie n & TO- o. gu, o. ns
deiend accidentally omitted The omission was Supplied
ssd a"d duy on the oh Of March, S which,
mistake explained in The bin eroaeousg a,ed in .ss body OF the
complainant and defendant Gray the surviving lrs
ssi Of March, iso Taylor and sae New
% Sa @ % jane M NJ ss l1 w s s'seIs oas a s
complainant Of Washington in The Dsrc, Of Columbia
This declaration of states that purchasers Of certain lands
n % s o n IN Ss
said ra, and Cray ecits the foregoing eanyfSanss which
Cray and involved this suit states
Ss p% a ss s ns s 1ns @ S
Ores hngs in sad purchases was then
snS s hs s%s Of T sS fs a
that deemed desirable TO work said lands mnes % ne
have wren of his interest and portion therein by
respective wives conveyed complainant ,he said IayS & and
s said Gray in in m all s sa
veysd Cray the TO be held BY eoman in
hs pu5pose and no oher Sc, forth
Ts p1 1 oS % @ m "pSo apsSnsS @ be
said haa shsS in The s several era n% so%Ssy Ss
e Of the parties ntrred Of four hanold seates
which owned By the kton by John
b. Macy, Levin, 30 and by James h,"aIa lay
Ts OF ad @ Sae
other things make said mines and lands as,ys EN- aa
trustees majority lhem their sc and they were
al be By
% II ws @ p @ assa of
having sold ou The who now owns aTge portion
1856 d carrying objects Of The has desolv
cd S Sm s 1gSs o" s%a S s
by lanes aasrd Taylor sgeat ga9yeI a
the complainant nor he feels quite certain sonn D. Gray
s %s hs made BY
Larios In April Sag 1913 after said purchases and aef
aransld Tsyor VINO was agent Of Knowles slo
Sn @ rancho but in 10 frequent
ned Taylor Cook denied tna there was any ruth n the Iu
daon before msn0ned o second
Ss T s GGos ws aSs pSss. 1ss 's 5 s
s did, ss % Ss sisted s % .s .s n9s an
The rancho with Cook and that he looked 70 Cook alone
ng long and James Branerd
Taylor both caos and Virgins they repeatedly ASSURED hum
from Cook 10 Taylor Gay ag praine,d Taylor eonh
ersy @ and in one Instance inrued
wgR Ae The $ & O bSSsS os d S5 % %
porunles, BY dsans him into habits Of dissipation m be be-
sa' sa "a %Siea s' VIII" aosd wsSs light
&C. Of said aneho On the 2'n nn OF SS s s
Jones' p..aes filed complaint in the district court OF
Cara alleging Virgins and Cock Qge,her purchased ,ad
from aS :" the ~ Sd SS SS
them Laos made the deed to Cook alone that was agreed
name, to ,ixseyenhs that, on The ad Of
April saS COOK made one osd s & = @ s as@ 1 Coon owned
ony Of the property, aud Virgins ownsa e
deed coos 10 them void a. 70 TIE petitioners hs
the time oflho pufehaae o. Cook end Virgins do Ls1
session Of l. knowledge of Taylor and Ghg al ,s pc
OF the minerals and cher has. de
for S %s.' upn%pS he deed to Taylor and Cray
ranho Taylor and Gray be compelled TO re-
s~s this BILL f9, responsive 70 y aGd gs1e.' tH psh
Soos % syo sR Ts% o. The Mines minerals" ores sc
rancho Ion Gray aso pg 81 apwer responsive 70 the aver
%snon.d @sn q, h' on bs S o. 2ae
made lor transferring this suit 70 e - had been
by John r. Gray order OF the sta ,aa
cause transferred proceedings N the Uneo
set that court the ith NoVeme 1884, made the
following decree!
Unitsd STATE, Ditrit Court for Northern Dft Of California
w''''''' "FIs.'' -. 'o' 'o'f'' Final Decree.
Thi. case coming on 10 be heard on the stipulation parties
respective soeIors, Gle, onhe b anwer and exhibits
appended and amer hearing argument OF conhsel 10
forth the said having been duly verified e OATH and no
replication by the companans be deemed and
hereby duty and susaned and that said
several forth said
defendants er assigns and grantees be- aud the
hereby against the SAID
pauans And s further ordered adudgd, and decreed that
Of the ad property described he deeds from
Grove C. Cook b. Gray and Knowles Taysr
& IN ssJ .nsvc, III and tho sam arc hereby yer
cOmpaiuants t the properly therein described
them free from all trust claim IN behalf OF said com
plaihants whatsoever.
nd be further ordered asudged dccreed that by
veyanee forth In said OF The 2s Of march, ~ 1850
NJ hts wife, and the said Knowles
Taylor and Eliza wife, said Robert Walker Robert
r. Sockton John Macy Lewis Levin and James Branerd
form 10 the ust from and all claias
whatsoever the part ofsmd companan o eter hen
perfect valid subssing title 10 the said
property described therein, said compiainanis
further ordered, adJudged and decreed that the con
Apseeo and his associates comprising Clara MiHng
Company bearing the 9t January, 1914 be- the
claims The said Companans either OF heu by way Of trust
| otherwise.
forth In said from Grove o. Cook Joe Abego and his
associates bearing OF january, lear,
hereby confirmed free from NIL claims OF the said
pIainants, by Of otherwise,
And further adudged and dccrced that the
forth in said John O Christie, and from said
attorney, John n. Gray wife, bearing 21d day
December s be- and the hereby, confirmed against
said companants free from all claim nf the said csmpanan
or either Of them, by way Of trust otherwise.
And further ordered adudgd and decrced that The convey
forth said from Jno Larios Grove O.
NJ