The Davenport daily gazette. [volume] (Davenport, Iowa) 1856-1869, 1856-12-27

kllE.
~. =. 4 Ill 5. )aS.s.s.
clrr = IL aesGIrs
ssSuaoAv zsass :. SO .. ~.
~ ~ = - asM - onnaasa.
Or vssessbls ssisAbss o. ~ Deasssas
r Aa1ia1ing, Y 49, - err petieaee. We
e. y wtll dlaesaee ~ essy hairs I'M
'e4nahs = nptse q ssr .saspsa sGIsss %
makA. - faapaaaaAls. We bars ssisas-
go = gsatiy lssa Nm iase the wsys q
trstA asa dsesaey No . sGeetisaais soa.
We have kisdly asd WIKI Christan grace
ev1slss1sd - TACT. sAst Il hSAis da,y 10
IL y Ne sexaep.s. iss,eeA Of osss 70
tsscA - seAsrsAls seieheee what 10 our
to NJ position asd age. When 10 Ass
assssa % wisA aost sagssciaps language
setssiy sabektsiae eisAsr his station or Iii
yesrs. Ne Asvs seasly pointed -, Ais e.
so:s. aad With teAAer affection soseAs "a
lest him iaso the trsth path o. duty. We
thosoht 10 . haPpy consequence Of due
sGSrss decided evidences VI contsition were
Visible. md a.lhoseA b msds no proaises
si iaprovsd condsci. ,ha, he had nentally
ard morally laid down new rule Tor the
regulation OF his edilorisl habits. Il ID
ti2csls shea 10 conceive our disappoint-
mest. esd how much our Palieace is called
upoa to bear. aad shat nsst BE our opinion
q he osAarsey .. the human heat. when
ne sssd the following in the Democrat Of
Chrislnss moraiag:
~Filty- .evea meMbess declared, W their
votes hat they were in favor Of repeal Of
/. The lags aesiese The Slave Trade"
Gssefte. Die 9AA
RKnAREsAWe asa The Editors of the
Csxette IL they seriously insend 10 stand
kv the above islsehcod! We ask them il
ssey have NO shame left nov that the cleo
ion i Overt W. e(Irm ikss ne sbovs Is
spsyfs1 Ssl Aslslersss JsassAoo1, We are sor-
~ 70 be compelled TO uss language 90
stfsae. bat we did suppose that the 0ssette
~ss ! srrs paper, ssd that il was poblished
~ give is readers correct Information.
This u very much like wicked old TO-
per. with bos,ie nose and irredsenahly
ssaksd habsis, lectsriag his son whom he
hsa desecied IN driakiag . glass 81 sweet
risss. % The evils Of iatempsrance. Blu,
% lesve eal psieAbor to-day uarebukea for
~ iseiv iliay II NJ deneasU-let - zee
how mach Lost to shaae We we're in hskiag
~ ssstenens quoted above. and Of how
gIsfing ialsekood ws have been guilty Of
uitering.
Ats~ days siaee llr. E,Asridge offered
Me iollevisg Eeselsaion 10 the House. It
was offered in view Of The fact, thas Gov.
sAdsns. Of South csrolina, hsd in his An
ssal Message. dissetiy saeges,ed revival
81 The slave trade. and that this saegession
he'd ioaad favor amoag nsnbsr Of Proni-
nesf Souihera sluaisss The resolution
go issended - rebake - Gov. Aaams
sud sshes hke Mn. =. ealIiag en- direct
seasiaest FROM IL Hoase Of Ceagrses in
opposition to The revival Of this .horiii and
inhunan tralRc." II those members who
voted against The resolution did 20 merely
because il called the slave trade @horrid
asA iahsnaa tsalie." they shesh not have
lost sight os-she fact. that, At the same time,
they placed themselves on record - being
.in favor or the repeal Of the laws against
the slave trsde"-snd that ne editor in
stating they occupied such position wocid
be guilty. Of JalsAssd. Here is the resolu-
ton:
Rssoisel, That the House regard ali aug
gestions or proportions Of every kind. BY
vhomsoever made, for 4 revival Of the
Slave Tfsde. - shocking to the moral SEN
timents 81 The enlightened portion OF man
kisd, ard any set on the part Of Congress
leeislstive, or cenniving, or legshxing that
kofrid and iahumsn traf6c, would Justly
sutjeca the Uaised States 10 the reproaeh
an sxecrafion of al civilized and Chnstisn
ps0Ple ihroaghouf the world.
varisss attempts we're made to aoloe .
vote on this resolation. and objections we're
ssale to its introduction. An abstract pro-
pssisioa sss ssssht 10 be Introduced, leay-
ING UT The language BY which this human
lnl6c vas siignatized. But the vote wac
faslly taken and resulted. yeas ia. nays
~. if sny-sesen menbers did no, in this
vote declare that ali suggestions aad pfoPc-
sitioDs fos the rcyissi Of the slave trade,
are not shocking 70 The moral sentiments d
The enlishteAed portion Of nsakisd. and
any act Of Congress legislative. connising
II or iegalixing the slsse trade. would nat
lastly subject the United States TO the re-
spssash ~ aAssiviiised and christian people
Throughout The world-whst did they de-
clare. If they declared this, did they not
actually declare IT The came time in sub
stance sna 10 fact, that they were in favor
Of the revival Of the slave uades Thi. i-
- pisia nssser, and the pisinest intelles,
can sudesasaaA il. We are aware there
osxas xape alarm nanifested ii the result, q
5susabie Political effect Of This vote anong
De 6fty-seven. comprising the msjority Of
: nscAaaasss friends in tie House. and that
forty mine II The 6fy-sesea Afterwards yo-
I'd ~ III. Onss resolstion, simply deelsr
81 1eEalxt edisot. sasiss and contrary 10
- 1estied policy Of the United States. IN
~repesl the ssvs prohibiting the African
slave trade'-bus this does not alter the re-
ssspsasikiiity Of their First vote. By their
iasi vote. they merely declared against the
G~seenneat policy Of reviving the slave
trade al ftis tine. The 6rst resolution mol
only declared sss;nst the policy bat again.l
Nsegk x .s...t.. ..r ,in s-&~ n 1a.i...