Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-10


Und. the above Rules the
trial during the FIRST week Of {
CASES AT JAM
LIST Week.
| ! Den lessee vs.. Mall0y;
2 Seay vs.. Cameron;
3 Morrow VS.. Napier,
{ Stanfield VS.. same;
5 Pointer vs.. same;
6 Flowers vs.. same;
I Rirkmsn vs.. same;
S Travis VS.. Wallace;
3 Lawrence VS.. Nashville 4
II nsboro' Turnpike Co;
| 10 S-Plby vs.. Martin;
| IL S7me VS.. Wetm0re;
12 Winston vs.. Fed;
II Walker vs. Ba e;
IL Mayor and Aldermen Of
Nashviile exparte;
/ Is Young vs.. Corbett;
16 Doe lessee VS.. Ray;
/ II G,Hdey use &c. vs.. Mar
shall;
Z IS same vs., same;
q Baldwin vs.. Elliott;
/ q Mnsley VS.. Gi liam;
II Brinkiey vs. McDole;
! % York 4 Co vs.. Mckenzie;
% McCampbell vs.. Bell;
% same vs. Bell = Rpbsrds;
2a Doe lessee W.. McEwsn;
26 Jasper ct al g. Barns;
70 l.awhorn VS.. Davis;
/ 2S Sloan vs.. Haskell;
% McGtvock VS.. Gilman
81 Mcjiavock 4 Co vs.. same
81 Jones vs.. Mitchell;
81 Mayor anu Aldermen OF
Nashville exparte;
So State Of Tennessee as.
&c VS.. smell ct al;
~ McCampbell vs.. Clemons;
% Jackson'e Ex'rs gs. Gil.
bert & Son;
So Charlotte Turnpike Co vs..
Spence;
81 Cross VS.. Green ct al;
IS Evans 4 Smith vs.. Shivers
e: al;
50 Forehand &C vs.. Farrell.
40 Chilcutt VS.. Mcintyre;
a. Martin vs.. Armstrong;
az CrunA VS.. James;
g Charlotte rurnpise Co vs.
Spence,
~ Fay VS.. Sloan:
As Ayrc- & Matthews vs.. G. J.
bert;
6 Hyde ". Maddox;
AZ Davis vs.. Museley;
as Charlotte Turnpike Co.
vs.. Spence;
80 Hughes We. Gilbert;
81 Alien vs.. GOoarich;
81 Frazier W Steamboat To.
ledo ami owners,
SO Goldberg Va. Hinton;
SO Harris vs.. Smiley ex'r;
"a Bans II 1eunesser vs.
Greene ct VI.
IS McKee admir- vs.. Noel
'6 oaHe vs.. Fame;
20 Bank Of Tennessee vs.
NrWsom;
SO NcGavock vs.. Paul et al
20 same vs.. Tucker ct al;
2d ~ eek.
co Wilson txlx VS.. Goo win
e. al;
81 johnson vs.. Raicliife;
62 same VS.. 0rtOn ct al;
% Manufacture. z Company
v, n bHs y Henly;
64 Lowry W.. Dabbs;
60 AdelphI Theatre Co vs..
Greene;
66 Harrison & Richardson vs.
Boiling q Straiton;
81 he La Nergne vs.. Dodge;
Is Martin vs.. Enslry;
% Williams & Htchings ".
Glover a Boyd;
Tl Rel vs.. Davis.
II l. 4 \ Railroad Co VS.
n. o. Love;
70 same VS.. Walker;
13 same VS. Gee;
"a same vs.. MaynOr;
IS same vs. Sledee;
76 Martin vs.. FuSsell ct al;
u McEwen, use &C IS Nor
ton ct a.;
IS Watkins VS.. Barns;
~ Nance VS.. Moore ct al;
81 Pa quett vs. Austin;
s Sneyug VS.. Roberts, ad'r;
81 Sloan ex'rx vs.. Halle;
S3 Carn ichael ". King It al;
81 Hail y vs.. WetnOre;
IS Wilkinson, ct al vs.. Gin
ard;
So Eaiherly vs. VinsOn;
81 Morse 4 Son VS.. Hess;
So Nash & Char Turnpike
vs.. Spence;
50 Bell trus ee vs.. Nc Donald
81 Bell trust, G vs.. Simuels;
81 State Of Tenn, Use, &C /,
vs. DOdd;
92 Dotson admir- &c vs. Dabbs
81 Smiley vs.. Den oss ad'nI;
~ Childie,s vs.. jackson;
91 Greer vs.. Jordan.
96 Hammer vs. Carroll, ag't;
~ Ament vs.. Tayluc;
~ UeLahsy vs.. Lawrence;
80 Cunningham vs. sl'Combs
& Cornelius;
lh0 Mclaughlin -. Kimhro;
l0l French vs.. duncan, Nor
gan 4 Co;
iA2 Lowe adm'r vs.. sloan;
lt3 Tay Tor vs.. 5 Boat Beauty
ct al,
lo4 Gilman vs.. Kimbru;
100 Matthewson vs. Philips;
.t6 KimhfO VS.. Watson,
lu7 steel ,S l. 4 K X Co;
iuS Buchanan vs.. Joseph;
lO9 Nancy trustee We Bglcy,
llO Demoss adm'r vs.. Russ.ll
et al;
III Scales vs.. Tenn. and Ala.
Railroad Co;
il2 Looney vs. Grizzafd;
ll3 Burger " Brien;
~ Austin W.. lIa,e;
3 Bland vs.. Boiing;
ll6 Boyd ". " oodWariet NJ.
III Bk OF Tenn vs.. MeN airJ
II al
ilS Bel'sex'r vs.. BIZ Of Trnrf
,l9 hank of tennessee W I
Mclaughlin; |
i20 Jackson vs.. Bell;
til Anihonysjr. W Jackson.
l22 teach vs.. POsnter u.e &C
vs.. Bell;
l23 Haker W jackson.
Ia BOwen ct al vs. Steven (
son ct vi, X
lbs Brunson e 81 W. Hick (
mau Il ri.
1876 Bank, Planters vs. Hud (
son,
l2T Bolton ct a. vs.. KimbrO; /.
l2S berry, use &c. vs.. Foster
admir- /;
10 Carte vs.. Hamilton et al I
10 Childress vs.Johns0 eta
Il same ". b, Jones etAi'
i32 Same vs.. Jscl son q al; 4
l:3 same vs. Owen et Al;
1874 Collins W. Gregory;
lis Cos e. n vs.. Mountr; Z;
li6 CaTtWr IN ys smell et al
i3T Chayous vs. Dickinson etIi
al;
lSs Douglass W. Turnpike Co
l89 Dsekryts Manufacturing
Company; /
l40 Demoss -. Beif; Z.
i4i F'nning " Bartlett: q
I42 frIBg W. z mmernan ct
Al, (.
i{8 Farrs vs.. Hundley:
ia Foster, uus.ee Vs. Mt 4
Marry;
li5 Goodwin ". Paul al
i46 Grr. nirld 4 Gov Man
uiactuiing Conn any. (
t4I G.esv,s Ct al VI. jackson
et al; 4
la Gray vs. Holt, agent:
l49 6loTer Va Telegraph Co., Z
Sd Week. 3
$50 ChidreSs ". NayoT 4 Al >
d-rmen u Nashville; .
a