New-York daily tribune., 1856-03-01

-, .r5 dAc;d,5 concurrence in the po~fion TINS
Goye,nm, mt has assumed IL now appears I'd 81 ,bs
Br;tain l. wiling toiarbitrate. lie congrs.uia co,.
Snste on IN, more pacific and pleasing prospect eon
n;nr tb;. c.apeing but still most important ~ "
49, A. 10 tb, enlistment case, the oouesponpee.,
sbovs the British Government may WIN Pa1s4i'.! ~!
and perhaps cOtscientiously, say they n"I .en
Ja,oS that was regarded by them IN the nature
- ~ .rooov which they may have considered as
b,oad and a. full a. co asstent with the hoho' VI u"
Government TO make. The President ana secretary
of state NAV have thought the acknowiedg mem nos
sufficiently explicit, but 1t Is eiuhhy Ce'.is -
Clarendon thought be- bd probably made ah tne
sroogv which could be made by Power jealous OF
Lsr dignity and bonor. The point of difference = tne
effect If the language used II Is enough - Io'' @
subject of discussion between tne Pa'li,sIs to'.
-,ls against the assumption. which Wouh De
violent one that Great Britain has MADE an eAPaha-
ton which ought not to be satisfactory.
Mr.. PEARCE did not concur with the senator ana
was not willing that DIR. Sewards opinion sh9uiu 20
IN the counry a. the deliberate view OF the senate
Sucb apolooy as we should claim from Great Britain
had not been made The disclosures IN the core,
spondence on ogr part exhibits mnniness, sPEls aiu
fsnkpess of which all should be proud he was soy
~ no such spirit characterized Great Britain Not
only has no satisfactory apology been made but the
LANGUAGE used BY the Britt Secretary amounts TO
tauIts and is therefore otferslve. Lord Clarendon
saws the United States have resored to means 10 oo-
tain evidence against her Msjestys servants or their
aoents bv practces sometimes resoIted to under des
motto institution, but which dsdained by all free
and enlightened governments Mr. 4. SAID he was
not an advocate Of war, ana hoped We snould NAM
tain peace: but he should acknowledge that the
correspondence furnishes any satisfactory apology or
what was done by Great Britain. The power which
invoked Us to be neutral the first to violate neu-
tahty. ,
Mr.. STUART remarked that, notwithstanding the
speech of Clarendon IN the House OF Lords, II turns
ont bv the correspondence submitted, that no PROPOSE
tom 10 arbrate wac ever submitted To Mr. Buchanan,
nor ANYTHING in any dispatch from Clarendon to Mr.
Crampton which comes up to that point. IL seemed
that clarendon had given the British people TO under
stand that that Government had assumed a generous
disposition by offering arbitraton-which we de-
sined, and which will be renewed. lnasmuch as
Great Britain does not intend TO live up to that treaty
he confessed a strong inclination in his mnd 10 aoro-
gate II.
Mr.. SEWARD said be had expressed no opinion
that the British explanations ought to be satisfactory
He intended to show that Lord Clarendon had dis
svowed an intentional aront, and that should not be
fOrcgOne conclusion tnal LOihlhg III the nature VI Ill
apology bad been made
Mr.. MASON said grave offense had beeo commit
ted against this Government by Great Britain 1t VIII
be found in some manner and 10 some extend that
Great Britain has lent herself to violation of her OBJ
legations to this country under international relations
and violated our domestic laws made for the protec-
ton of our own peace and nation He understood Mr.
Seward to say that apology had been made by
Great Britain for her ofense. lie Mason conceived
an apology 10 be this-between nations r. between
gentlemen. When gentleman does wrong and de-
sres TO make reparatioD, he apohgises-admits the
wrong frankly and ingeniousy without reservation and
places himself where he would have stood if the wrong
had not been committed. lie evinces an honorable pur
pose He Mason submittedto the Hon. Senator Sew
ardl whether such apology had been made. On the
contrary, such explanation had been offered adds
i'm ult to the general injury. If ever question oc'
CURED in our international relations demanding indem
nity for the past and security for the future, 1t was
here presented but he placed reliance on the good
sense Of the people of England and our own people
and when there is really cause for war between
honorable men none will arise. This he took for
granted and the people both sides of the Atlantic
will make up their minds Jointly on the same terms.
MI MASON then moved that the printing of the
British Enlistment document be increased to ten
thousand copies, and the printing also of the came
number of these received to-day, both to form one
volume. Agreed to- Adjourned TO Monday.