New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-03-11

~ bssd On h. Iand. lo~s, be tail.
.ssr obsr aiur. VA u, ..foor q s,eos
s~et had saaittsd BY eo IA Ne belonged to &c
sss sIspey ME dss ffo T.rsf ownsT TIE Coufi
~ Hs tss defsosli ., -safs one aoidi ,. ISds
sAsss b., 'a e''e .Ne,-l ot.s,s SION. s,s
e.sst Wssi va go n ,'se,d 20 We 80 Ss.sson On The
Ront Nor Indeed Ssc I'D a. Al o. WA S ~ se
ysaIste srop osasr sroands Ar.n no, very ss ~ 10
..y, q he ss.s via, 80 S,s 20 70 Bry Or
a. ss.n~nt hkh By psr be Adni'ei tina he tnai vhh
- ,,c h, Sos DOT spPeaf have TO Or 10
ss,. be- .s.d srsa ~ snysy ner,od IN The nds,ieI
80 w,. y .r,iss bold ralol s,nli-, Is-o
ss,ss@ss, eopfs harms sr,i el,n to land waea y
- ,srsl lLd evsn thscs - ttten - We cf,d
e. insseeosp, to Bradley to take deed and i.y tie
sss~serssn, OPOr wbsh ..-anl 10 soge the'o any cole
fr,.ents very daeren' qss,ou from he rres't
Ne .pou eersdsrs'ior, 'nd ' material - i' a
sGsssn vad for puuOae 20 create Le'es' r h
fs@h bu, b0wevsr thai esse y is~ci if -
s,sssn a the ssa,e Court IN H H. II
- In s.yns ia, u . not s- IN ne i1',er use NJ D.
s<sis question, ths anus not ory zoo hy a. Nv
ssS rsshAss add he fyIs a. aerd 20 ne dei- ia
- seeisfed thai ~oue pas The re1'' ard nsAe ae DC
= tr1 and the rr sg'tai7ed IA tss s1pfene Cog
wAs ssls the plaintiff es'ogpea IN eu gflaw 70 t''"f b.
sxui.cc4y made with view 70 Influence 'ae d~fenisu:s
s.ss.,, a.: s, AID I'D 'sS s Dor, % tn.
ssss Of az s.,orJsi In PATS than he .ce while
ss th claim oi tile ~ CoIi o law .urey ne latter - not
ne rsl. sc.tebded Tor 'usE,s 's''sl nq dnss waiel
siewsas budios ones ald bars the
ra'' g ', ,.. ~ as's 10 ss .ey p d.:
1917. ,h a. 80 Ore. or .ors S.s or one S o. or va
ssf IL the Tus confined 70 VIA it W common psfanrs
a. .r r 's .s, to .''' td 'PS a 80 o. WA
sSss.s,on' wilii srTJ TO ard fence or line of'''e
n trssossi q these inquire. sisre' wi,,
0ssss V rss Foundation 10 W 's- rl.@ tf- 1911 81
g act OF dscEs,iots Of ths ,r'r i.e sh ~ mis-
s..l inrsceut Psr'y ~so 70 r-'c ta--'9 ,r~ ~ ~
30 eb SARGE ne or nr. co. "'e hi' oan sc
>, ,csssary to prevent the ira a. sud protect the
!sas :. .gPreAs.S the Only oYne'.or for tn. supposed
sss sos.s.a ss 'ot me tSI s o. rgs s'es no. upon
rsssnt case, that Il is inca table permit party
ss w. and such the Language Of the equity eA'es The
Wendell v. Van Rensselaer, J. ctS., So: 'Ifone m,n
ysrehAst and eIpeul money Oh land rDte
sphicn Of iii. without making known hi. claim. he s4a
sh person would be Of f,asd aud injustice hi.
ssssesncs bound By 20. equitable e.9g Sc hume
sSset, To- Needha rsle $40 In Storrs
sg.ity AID OF Lori MAnsded Of the
dsy s1se I1e IN court o. lev ;, qg-'' liable ID bis
ssS,, stove referred TO- 900 wh.cl W. J.uce B,u-5u d.
sssotPei ,s,,. II hs be,odca fud reer. lCt
"sa III. pr q sse Gee be ms 60 p 70 . Of Lq4s
Eqsity arPesp also this, that th,' t0r' ai,t
ssrsht the Of the and 20 the n Of e danger
sffsad will regard the Of the
pssnee upon the Submissions complained O. H. Of pur
vreIse Niyen vs. Beknsp 2 l. r. rs end Isl. vs. Fisher
Isss@s Tor .nS s sIs mae r
ensses The ssreemep, uon The ptneps' Of rs Psrior
b erected uey protect the building long 1t ,hsn
stand wall he built they m.y elbow to be Pfesered
As position compel the claimant the expense
= is removal Bet ia neither Of these a.i two
seey to prevent fraud ths' the tee should be go b.
Fl
IN erection Of either wal building thereon Ia zach
svn.r stsr, By and suffers Ts or building 70 be- % sr,,ei
snes no. no., h me % 3 ep n az Ia
o., the Coart csnno, that a. leell uo 10 lost ersb,
Sssi,oSs de-. sSiv .eriea In ,e decd the
~ intiusns doubt OF the tife Of ITO Bibe Society
ks land IN qussiOu, the situation Of the strip Of lsli
wss excluded By the wall. here .isudSs thereon, ard
ss usi hat ,G 1hs p scoa sS s to ne
% ssld hardly De- able that the 'ry Sre dence o.
s. q a S aa ': Whether W. Sp
y .syiss that the r1o@; Anew or sG reI''
IN controversy. To Justify the ntcr.reco 81 Cont OF ~
IN socd 6S snd notice innocent mistake, bu'
also tho, the owner that be buiins RE
sesnd question 10 Barr sal 20 Maine 'j aud cases above
n,cposton Of this Court OF Equity In wise
,oted BY the defendant Doubtless under sent syss
his eqntabe claims. aud the fset proved wcr such
trdsmsnt rcousisicn with suh equity hsh' per
ksys avail purpose dfcuse even thou the
scetsinsd 10 rrAye injunction other air. relief
Dot defendant has presented here no such ejuae n
Nj defense Ia based solely uro legal grounds and this
ssssrpel will M a Law avail HIN.
Vron this srouId also a trisi must he granted Toe
costs M abide the event
MARINE COURT-MAkcH iO-Before Judge MAYNIED.
William " Bowss James w Baker Rem .min : a. ~
p<r Rufss Crane Briggs. Henry ' Lowell, John
N Osniu. Joseph s. Taylor, JOs y. Ebng, John Lloyd,
Robert Freeman, Junius T. StssE, james T. NO.ton the
HoA. ~ Sherwood c. ChAuncoy Burr. Ess Dusenb'try,
lea n Hall. Denni Mclaughlin Louis N Glover Jane
A. Fred 4 job lock Ezra W.
Jshn H. brisFs OSoon Holden John n Bnk erhoA, Jos
r Abbott Henry Ransom, EnwO0d {. Cline.
u-n. ~ .u.oo~ o. ~. To-, al. s.,tiA.