Washington sentinel., 1856-07-31


yolved in the action Of that body. From this
review the Advertiser establishes the conclu
sion that "no one of these votes was given for
the South during the Congressional career of
Mr.. Fillmore" II is fact, material to be re-
membered, that the votes referred to cover
period of service terminating in the year
l848, and that the fact is as the .Adoertiser
has stated. Acting with the worst enemies of
the South, Mr.. Fillmore never gave one vote
that was even impartial to the South upon the
question of slavery.
The Advertiser has referred to the Erie let
ter as fair expression of the opinions of Mr..
Fillmore. 1t may not be improper to add, in
extreme caution, that in the year l848 Mr.
Fillmore departed from the rule laid down by
himself and General Taylor, and answered
Governor Gayle, of Alabama, in letter ex-
tensively published as document in that
campaign. Lest we should be charged with
suppressing this document, and as conclusive
proof that Mr.. Fillmore has never retracted
one opinion in the Erie letter, we republish
that to Governor Gayle:
ALBANY, June 81, l84S.
Dear Sir: Il have your letter of the 18th in
stant, but my official duties have been so press
ing that have been compelled to neglect my
private correspondence. | had also deter
mined to write no letters for publication, bear
ing upon the contest in the approaching
canvass. But as you desire some information
for your own satisfaction, in regard to the
n nuht vna frop fha
on the slave question, have concluded to state
briefly my position.
While / was in Congress there was much
agitation. on the right of petition; my votes
will doubtless be found recorded uniformly in
favor of it. The rule upon which | acted was,
that every citizen presenting. a respectful petit
tion to the body, that by the Constitution had
the power to grant or refuse the prayer of it,,
was entitled to be heard; and, therefore, the
petition ought to be received and considered. If
right and reasonable, the prayer of it should be
granted; but if wrong or unreasonable, it
should be denied Think all my potes, scheth
er on the reception of petitions or the consider
alton Of resolutions, ioiU be found consistent
wiM this rule. Italics our own.
have none OF my Congressional documents
here, they being at my former residence in
Buffalo, nor have / access to any papers or
memoranda to refresh my recollection but
| think at sometime wilhelm Congress took oc-
cason to state, In substance, my views on the
subject of slavery in the States. Whether the
remarks were reported or not, am unable to
say ; but the substance was, that / regarded
slavery as an evil, but one with which the Ma
tional Government had nothing to do--that by
the Constitution Of the United States, the
whole power over that question was vested in
the several States where the institution was
tolerated. If they regarded it as a blessing
they had constitutional right to enjoy it; and
if they regarded it as evil, they had the
power and knew best how to apply the remedy.
did not conceive that Congress had any
power over it, or was in any way responsible
for its continuance In the several States where
IT existed. have entertained no other senti-
ments on this subject since / examined it suf-
fcently to form opinions and | doubt not
that all my acts, public and private, will be
found in accordance with this view / have
the honor to be your obedent servant,
MILLARD FILLMORE.
Hon. JOHN GAYLE.
1t will be seen from this letter that Mr.. Fill
more afirms the common doctrine amongst
the Abolitionists, that Congress has no power
to abolish slavery in the States. He also says
that be does not think his votes contradicted
the principle that every citizen had right to
be heard in a respectful petition or resolution.
The record cited by the Advertiser will show
that no abolition petition was ever presented
that Mr.. Fillmore did not vote for its reception,
and that no resolution was ever presented re-
buking the action or condemning the princi-
Piles Of abolition, that Mr.. Fillmore did not
vote against its reception.
With these antecedents there could be no
safety to the South under the administration
Of Mr.. Fillmore, unless be shall pledge him.
self to the positive maintenance of the Kansas
BILL
1t is very well known that in the canvass of
lS4S, both General Taylor and Mr.. Fillmore
laid down the doctrine that the President
ought not to interpose the veto unless in cases
clearly unconstitutional, or informal. Now, ac-
cording to Mr.. Fillmores avowed opinions, the
Missouri Compromise is constitutional, and
the Kansas act is violation of the compro-
mise Of 1850. 1t cannot be said that mea-
sure discussed since 1854 can be the subject
Of hasty or imprudent legislation. Therefore,
if the Black Republicans shall, during Mr.. Fill.
more's administration, present bill repeal.
ing the Kansas act, and restoring the Missouri
restriction, he will be bound to carry out their
will by signing the bills. 1t is inevitable.
Nothing except his distinct pledge not to do
so would prevent it. And why should he not
Suppose the friends Of Mr.. Fillmore, composed
of equal parts of Northern and Southern men,
He will not say what he proposes to do upon
the proposed legislation. Can it be contended,
after his election, that upon bill passed by
the votes Of Northern men, he stands obliged
to contradict their wishes to CRAFTY the
South 2 Will that be carrying out the will Of
the people2 Will that be a fair representa-
ton Of the Northern men who have as much
right to dread bis administration as the South.
ern men2 II, then, Mr.. Fillmore were in
doubt upon the exercise of the veto. he would