The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-08-16


h,e ssf.ss Wa. :. % .s.Insd coeL ne aslsndanf
anoeI Hss head @ han AID ths Remaining lsesi u SAID Wig
! ss 1T sad JoSss one DIVIDES . | usSs S.
Z ss, a .Ss a g ale % sss a, fs.sa Ihs ssI
parry EeA q PFinepAig iElsIased said sLe As his
eoss sad ~ Sss q sSsne sns s,o.sSs ne
e ' a ...s a.a s = S s.s1 ss.1 ..s %
S,ss = . = "a ..ls ss.sss.an e Is o sad Iasso
which ansp4 sass estry and dssnsr
,ss ss , Lee s s',s. 20 Iss q s sossas san g
Lsufeaesi and company woiag qaek
hsTsslsd il AID GsadsIaSs Mining COMPANY and pSreaa
ssd LHuenei had only nOs bur
and E&ase he real osBsr wbole, nearly
Ra Hose sfc ons n IL eeunsei n ss and b,s
sousles !. The before lhe uuss sues district cOUn os
Uelsa sH'es board ef land in California Of their
Lnarsncs ard IN order 10 ago pssle ebsrassnents and de-
sys ho me rssUtnaOn conflicting eiuims before me
nissaEtrs ad nar agreed Lanrsnce JasO
LEri4 prosecutsa commissioner
6 a. ann Sus ss as s ne sas Ss' y ss s sS p 1
sss ho,s = q saa TOOK an active Ea1
made by the board FosSaL The defendants,
and insisted rha me said
vested an absolute s ad rosaai and his asssns They have
e in ts Aaapte sres and Earps and ne has mace and
eonErss. q 4 nss @ ~ seas az nd IL sem. ys % sns
claims California me eonhrmsons BY me camnissonsr, BY
The Uhiied STATES benef, Of the
rnai appcuD Of The proprietor Parties deriving
from COOK o so y md d'sa Gray are 0ppe ire sm
ing the us q the vendor 4 had ssea mpeset the
Lsuenc and fossa sun ssi their sndulsn. preiensons
nuiy final Judgment November
l ~ ere ~ masRE sl Hs,ss%sni % WIN sd @ Rose %
complainant ham from eoasy has
legal coH6 Of Fossa
po n ss name q and , = vss,s ~ Gs. y and
informed e complainant that praceedEgs 70, me eoHnspoH
Complainant agreement
% . s 1s claim hSsd be IN ss Gs.ns Of
such The cOuhrmaon Of Fossi has been
disIricI eOur for norern
'S % IS he @ snss . hs e. ss % ss : o[S 70 1
drawing sd apPeH and u 20 obtain patent IN ts name Of Fas
sids
me o, sssasst ". v,oison = s s D. @ s.rs.ss M
iasInel Of CeauhIa, h squiy
GRAY, Virginia ItigaIs
thr UIired si district coun for California . TAKE th neces
Junction, of
The gs. ,ius &C. derived 70 the cDHPanant and SAID
crau Laus from Lnras Cook, the deeds
FREQ Coo. sns ~ 70 taylor and Cray he declaration q ssl
These nes a were fully protcacs snd secured BY e ueA
February s4 By treaty legal
sd a me data q sas treaty me eaap.alnaa aEe
nid Al al nmes and al proper tribunals including is eoui
~ sn a ss board of lana
s9E rSGs a. .S as % s SSs a1 II ne rs, ?,
kc thai has rg should be pr0ected under the
CEs sy being sPeeAy excepfed IN Paleh tAt
rights decreed charge said
ahG palenfse, that such pRieDiee BE-
complainant;
shi issue unil the rights of de
property secured under decree of thus The
L.sSeas Eos-s selling lands sistnrng
The posseasiou tberco kc sc, and from vosins
AgFermeut tbs eject be
Tia ahsz ihe Hon. Tbaas
a f Land Oce be enlnlhsa
a granting delivering patent 10 the said Charles
fHrcr defendants have answesed inns al
and for oFaar 81 pub
ssfendABts The hall fT
from Cook Taylor and Cray and said udg
az November II, ls, valid and bntDg said Ian
Eag and FosaI and preclude claim DER
property said
sHTv1Enz Aforesaid eutied us benefit
tued under the aforesaid confirmation
rHncho grained BY the conveyance fou
szd LsureBct, ErdKe and
originally couEegno BY Cook Tsy
Gray sb0ad be pGIenrd The
Fussul grsVtousy 10 final decision ofthr
appearing o Henry LnureRcs
William WigEn tbe be q James ~ J0Bs and
John B1W1s Cray residents o The Dstric
complainant euusipI copy a ts
psshcd puhaised an the city n WASH
sad District twice week or siE weeks before tht
Monday Oober the said absent De
and substance 81 said hill and them
zppeaT person ky soBctns hesre said
have why decree ought prnyed
OthsTEl-e, ne sumo VIII be taksn fa~ confused
BY Of
TsE: JNo. A. SMITH
True e0py-Test; JNo A SMITH Clcrk-