The true Democrat., 1856-09-23

the abOlltlOnlStS Of '4S and '52, are harmoniZ- ing with the Fillmore and Fremont branches of the American party. Bot branches of the Know Nothing party encounter great difficulty in defining Fremont's religious position. It has been proved very satisfactory to many, that he IS both Catholic and Episcopalian.
 will now present more pleasing picture The democratic party are in the field, fully and completely organized; they are battling against sectionalism, under the broad flag of the Union. There entire State ticket is composed of na- tonal men, from Governor down. In each congressional district they have sound national men in the field; and in every county in the State they are supporting men for the Legsla- ture who are sound to the core "Buchanan and the Union" is therCry; Fremont and Free dom" is the watch-word of the fusionsts.- Several of the candidates on the fusion ticket spread out before their audience a map of the United States, with black line drawn around the slave States. The south and her institu- tons are denounced in unmeasured terms.
 On the 10th l attended democratic meet ing in Washington, Davis county, in this State. It was addressed by John L. Robinson, former member of Congress from the eastern portion of the State He was attentvely listened to, and made one of the most effective speeches that ever listened to. There was large au- dlence, and scarcely person moved from their seat during two hours speech He accorded to MT. Fillmore high character for, exalted patriotism and devotion to the Union, and re- gretted that the contest was. not between him and Mir. Buchanan, instead of Fremont. He maintained that the election of Fremont would inevitably produce a disunion of the States that he was sectional candidate, and looked alone to the north for support; that, if elected, hls cabinet, as we'll as foreign ministers, would be selected from the north; that no southern man possessed of self-respect would accept office under him. He asked if it. could be ex- pected that the south could or would remain in the Union under these circumstances; that the power and influence of the government. at home and abroad, would be brought to bear against her interests. He vindcated the south against the charge of d;soyalty to the Union said she had never asked for anything that was not due her; that It could not be shown that she had ever attempted to force upon the north any unjust or unequal legislation. He said that the south, in her loyalty to the Union, had submit ted to the Missouri compromise; that its repeal and the passage of the Kansas bill was but an act Of justice to the south; that the south had equal rights with the north in that territory annd that it was left with the people to deter mine whether they should have slavery or not that the people were the proper tribunal to refer 1t to. He said the north, and not the south were responsible for the difficulties in kansas that It was not until after the information of emlgrant aid societies in Washington and throughout New England, immediately after the passage of the Kansas bill that the people of Missouri took steps to counteract their objects, which were to flood Kansas with an anti-slave- " population; that elf-preservation prompted Missouri; and the south to take the steps which they had in this matter. He said that when there were fifteen slave and fifteen free States. the south voted to admit California with free State constitution, when by doing so she lost her balance of power in the national Lngisa- ture; he said the south only asked to be protect ed in her constitutional rights; that the consti- tutlon nor the Union would ever have existed Ii these guaranties had not been secured to the South; he said the republicans boasted that the south dare not leave the Union; that if she did they would whip her back before break fast the next day after she seeded Where asked he, would southern Indiana be found, in the event that the north attempted to keep the south in an unJurt and unequal union by physical force? Not on the side of the north The fight would commence right here. The north never could reach the south with an army through south ern Indiana. What could Fremont and his fa natcal followers offer Indiana in the place of our present glorious Constitution and Union? Gould Fremont, Hale, Seward, Giddings, Sum- her, etc., give us such a constitution and such Union as Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and others, had bequeathed to us? He exhorted every man and woman present to stand by the constitution and the Union; that the Union could only be preserved by guarantying to eve- ry portion of the Union the rights which they possess under the constitutions; that the very moment the north disregarded the rights and interests of the south, the Union was in dan ger; that as soon as perfect equality ceased to exist, the Union was not worth saving. He said Indiana had always been conservative, and that probably the existence of the Union depepded on her course in the approaching election He lmplored them to array themselves against sec tlonasm and fanatcism, and support the con- stitution and the Union.
 give you this as a sample of his speech He IS bold and earnest, without being brae- gart and expresses himself in terms not to be misunderstood. All of the democrats talk just as he does. The sun does not shine on men who are more loyal to the constitution and the Union, than the democracy of Indiana They are fighting against the combined factions of sli parties. They have made no concessions to sectonalism and fanaticism