New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-12-22

,n ua.ble &c p receive az eubsrT Is'eat which
Wheicr :h-re nay 10, hS-ry 20 h.rrsart
then ard h-irs sssfed ,hI, he reaor "a cnte 20 'ne
h,f asked 'or the us~ssoa for the persmP'ory maadaa
| grated. with costa
| TRIAL OF cHAKLES b. HUNTINGTON FOR
ALLEGED FORGERIES.
| CAPKos
ibis herg the lsst day OF the ter the morotng vas
o-eured in posing '-utehosH Gustav. hies.s who -e'
Ard convicted several wcsss aso for crsniss as- sun
rsrT-.sntrd sn..f pocr. and ,od Sci ii' ih,, Re
bed pureeAsed Al amount Of st sI.; Tbs, bad been s. r
n ,es,spee prm,,tea rs, the cr. va. eonsn, ed
.ome vas..e. 10 ie.;iacd to a.. II he, were
cT d D . s9q s I he =. T @ he
Prs laid with lane subs .hieh -oald have ~
Jude at ss time q The Tin, .ltonsa the Jasy sn',e,-
nui hila which be thought unlocked ia. ~hes
mystery ana satisfied aim that the jury very sasscious
s1cs,T md i, medc. G,ru housht hey .rrs e.yos 70
the prisoners onriton when in feet wss hi. brother who
questions put the wtne.ses wss Nchses confined
tsppcn se the prisoner bis Chrsc,a not
.ntoned. He sen. to the State Prison for three and
George Wilers who tried and convicted for
sbH1s Mr. Pe,tisew In the Bossry vas 'eas to the Peni-
Wills and Coney, the loan brokers, who were con-
receiving sf"c worth ae.s knowing them to have
III. .s tia, b. counsel DID NOT Be- Prrn. to NOV.
for new u, {" biz he prisoners. %s.n. wee entirely
PsrtiAlty which the Court exhibited on the trial would be
isdsd bis thants BIZ. counsel for the m,nser 10
neS ~. dTs s. Sen H o..S
verdict unexpected by majority OF tho people
,ss % The deter
tie prisoner. from The rspe,,,os .: guilt b; would ..y thai
They had up their minds diaersn! Ia
and PERMITTED to 60 RE, 'Sy Ho"6s ss" s1 ss
,,rm.iixs their character in such ndehle
tbs, they could not hers.es hold 9r iseT head, n see
seen without .vs Jutss C.prcn IN pa,,ias sn,ef &C.. aid
which suisbed nom any other hat il had been hi,
rne be concerned since be had sted 10 his present ca
liz sympathy force in with reference public
The amount Of properly .sen i. ,h.,
o. the lNe, Ills o;yI.se .siety and .eca
good many since be appointed Judge that the crime
Of burglary and .eceTns stolen goods VS.. I.s''' No. only
the persons n Ser. 's%s,sss bold And
the Here In ibis instance meIchsn. has o. 900 Sh
good, stolen from him. and compelled to spend ora 20
so. s.s worth and .sG no % one q The
% . S1R Ssd .n heard. IS. YER. !;
short space Of forty minutes found verdict Of guilty
they Il. % tn n S To
goods and also that they two Of that numerous class OF
s % sGe Ha'' IL reference concy he testimony
vOuanOg. but the jury made 60 % ,S " s
Court that Conley could not have done what ne aG sna
he IT.
reflection the Judge thought that the Jury rehrcsa more
Gsred Judge. the habit Of sending poor men eud
boy 'nS es. snt and effect Of Which
the persons Injured not fraction IN value compaed 70
Se.r 10 the State Prson The question presented it.e
wiether persons in high ,hOse had been surrounded ali
maturity who b,d the restraining Influences Of pleasant
families pnd such men sGss over ever o s1SS ,s
tie least show propety justice make an Exception IN
would do ws mOi Court and the Judge tina, would yield
would not only be justly sse 70 oen.,e Su q u s 40
f =. Be Vas disposed let the prisoners eo
@ ;.: H ir; make wives
S1y to Pf' s should DO =.
would make perfect mockery of the law Thee coadsrs
b. Would be violating conscience and that w.. principle
Re many years resolved TO do Tue sentence OF we
State Prison lady supposed to be the wife Of Con
ley eurl him tensco att, ,hs was
rho,opbe said that be well known to the ,athor
ties Europe and lad served several tsm, pr y.
TIA, Ws and Coniey had ei s
e,ry up their case to higher tribunal unless he got $500
Judge Beebo asked the Court to allow the prisoners
remain IN N, ely d' IL G t.t S %
now Tie Jude said he bad discretion IN the matter aud
would them in the hands OF the shenn The prisoners
A. orc OF the jurors on the Huntington trial !: an
% sesssd be snsu p. SI Atcn.1 Ss Court
ni.S Nil L. reSue. and postponed the trial u ChAhes b.
Before the Jury was discharged, James T. Brady,
esq rose Al .d May please the Court Genensn o. ths
!. IN two Of the morning Psper Ts Herald
and The Tse and it may be In othe, op nae no.
S ", =. s s that While they %p.ond n;
trial and before they had heard al this evidence they nod,
each otbrr On that subject Of do not nerfrs and
will in ,py c. s..,e sT BE- s tSs view d d:
defense Which conducted either By myself alone or any per-
VIII whom .Gsss %es se p.!.s1
penonsl liberty the one baud aud Pnoe uses ~ .n
SissT chs s IT,; un py
rpsed s IN the rsUe S s%s va. o.
$1; verdict f .Hysss 4.
a. this trial proceed. Your Honor viii not .rpPo.e ,h.
At. the caution wnsn Sn ' specially When
there in trial a. from nov w oadty v.
ss 70 s: !p nj sSs is @ a
not br! to their dom. that y. g.sy w ms Ii.
thor articles viii be directly ...a 70, nc
9..S lsts:a G.'s yss ed and
knew an instance ofhe press synpatf ps with sny
s sn nsc,.. 81 human nature viii be altered
DO, .snt prevent ne gy rn md oSerws. .cb
teops 10 them a. and members 81 soaely ! n..a
hsn PT,,s0s S psr8. can o. only defend ellen.
in he honest discharge Of duty counsel IN cur .,
lS:nsS that H., BE- inodueed against the q th:
land or exposition. Of the Law o. ths sna @
.rIy beloIs % the tia. q the have no eonIo 81 2
tie city fEewYort nor have 20: nsas
sr,,bnF nnb,h, al my particular requests but wien come
10 ,n ~ hi. cause viii AXE some Of ,ne.e
,ce- ifthey escape the 80. re-,
bs m ,he bearing and will select thos- thst are ne
.sar.t m client; Tor the purpose OF svsns e o"J
t a. al have him. lot against what appears IN
.yd.n.e but possibly fail 70 have some
e., mon thin 70 suppose tha the ume
- - rhen will Sustain from maknf CONNIE
,or t .ro.. sbsurdity; thst vi. be az the end Of
,s thai Of these emen the inrTj 10 gag,
v ace hat they correct w Their facts A. Ihs noa
ba erpressed it's opinion % to what hs eonenso1 ~