The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-08-29
In Eaaity. Ne. II6I.

In Equity. Nc. Il6I
cireEa Court ofthe Distrtf Of coIaAbi4I
Robe walker AaRsI Jaes Edndge Hensy aurehes Charc.
tos.a wis John Bowie Gray. aEa the hfs Of Jame
NJ J0hes, deeeaseG
tbs bill originally filed IN bs sAase Gray
paiRant but aewAd eSe O The court made defend
AMI.
On or soSa! The st Of ssplsmbe 1872 grant made 81 e
hs o. San Jo.e de Guadalupe Upper California and
Soandaes .preiasd assigns
eompiainant ADVISED mai aye action ohe' proceed
ing alter e dae u said giant required IN order 10 eos The
T. Cook, eoareI ecsd eple
her, ~ and Sa, ss1Ssss raa ~ s,o's coo asa aos a. " %
AP s4e cosy which hed enhbsi in has
assigns, prsscoas hhs said Tay
o and two hahs said Gray all The neludng s one Ssn
pany which said Cook Lakn parieipa"rs
last together with the right OF way wset
Gar which were needed for eans on sd mines ao land snf
nseesaIg M SeeaI~ ma ansb~ saIinT on aid
mines and together win all The right tle
d Si 'a COOK and
by deed om Cook and wife 70 Taylor sy
duly recorded The s Of March $50 which
eyance have been dated 81 Aph. ls4s.
indsnaIe deeaiaon Hus
2 Of Mareh 1850 between sad ofbe city and OF New
the sse of Virginia. and Jane NJ his wife, and the
and her subscribers Of uust Of the part
This declaration OF states that purchasers Of certain lands
ad ia ton and ia ts
dar and Taylor
Gay and TWO other In this suit states
the ie lands minerals AND
in The Of said Taylor and Cray IN Inc proportions
Ghs in The name Of Taylor and s the name Of Gray
3 ana s and Ds
respective conveyed The complainant the said Taylor and
things which previously
veysd said Taylor and Gray The same TO be held BY complain
he purposes ad oihe forth OF
raye snS aS % Gay @ hs 70
sad and other e'cnbed in The sserai
Taylor Gy hold the ame for the use and ben
psres interested Of four un red shares Of
3D. Macy, 70 By Lewis I.vs 20 and BY James
proper OF said estate, minerals ores and
majority them, sc and they were
business, ey The relative
n.eres ed IN said properly have been esnssd
having sold ou b the cmphan who now owns ase p.fho1
1885, and the carrying out the objects Of The ro.t has devov
chase from Grove T. Cook and vie pvson by John
Cray and by as,ss Branerd Taylor as agent Of knowles
complainant, he ei qts certain John D. Cray O,
as Spy Oher peon was in The purchases Sy
from aos In phi OF May e4e after said purchases anG aeI
Taylor sgen, Of Knowles Tsyor and also o.
John B. Gray hs. ne dssndan Mgsn nv psmss
Taylor Cook denied tua there uuh IN The ~
asoD bsoss nsSlonsd for ,he
s oT c9os TO To and Cay s. gR tse s
and did not object % H. assert any OPPOSING a az s
rancho Cook and that he looked Cook alone
and sequieesd In The sale made o Cook to Taylor and
Taylor both Cook aud Virgins they repeatedly assured hun
from Cook % q rsStoI ana Cray and TayoI eon6
ding IN he s 10 20 e e.rs
Virgins departure OF Ja.. nrsnerd Taylor WsEns
poSSiilss and by craving BIN dp u he be
eonhned drankard make conveyance dasa 80 June
u said rancho On ths 2Sth Of Iuse IS ""
Jones q. parties MED m of complaint district q
tA,d d:ts q cs :@, u 1s e0S9 q .
aHeho from LAnos 10 the PIopoon o. o % NO
bsm ,Saa sos made the deed 70 Cook alone agreed
Cook and that Cook should hold The ne IN n'
Apr s4s Cook made The Taylor Gray betenbeO
MY seventh Of Ss properly wssn owned the rssda
thai Taylor and Gay we're guilty Of iIand IN the -
ohs purchase of Cook and Virgins from LaIG mssa'
..dS q = %,s ~. s"qSt Of for and Cay that The Pc
uuOners Joass legal owBe, nRdsr Ep. Of
.enSrd 10 me deed o% Cook Ts; and Gay
prayed hf decree npnuns 'se deed TO and sy a. 70 ..
coyery &C KsOles Taylor then in CaloEnS hed an an
s.S,"s 70 ' =. ~ T oa. S srse n: .: to ne
Cook Taylor Cray the mRes minerals, &o II ssd
mentioned On hs Harcb, 1884, agreement of counsel
for northern district Of caifor a. had been demanded
his and by order Of the stse eou said
transferred Ans, yaroas oessdng 10 hs United
for the northern district fCshforh which
In this b that cOurt the l November is made the
following decree:
Units4 Siai Dr Court for Northern Ditrid Of California.
T.u.. - e.., nH4 Decree.
coming heard, the stipulation OF parties BY
appended, AFTER bearing argument, o council or
ded adudEd and decreed that the said matters and Thing set
replication by the compsnahs be DEEMED and are
hereby taken TO hsve been duly proved and snd mat a
dsepdan and their an, end gt.ntees Be- and the
hereby certified and confirmed against TIE said com
m ss,s oC re ,,s nv DESERVED
Cook wifs Jchn D. Gsy and Kooes Tsylsr set
nst The eonpsnan properly te-in DESERVED
passed eu from ~ claim IN ecasf Of said com
nd h furtrr ord., .susrsd ascreed s' ny me
veyance o The 2lst of march, D. 1880
T.yor ard EIza his END Robert Walker, RoScu
sockpu, John Macy, Lswp Levin and James Brsnsrd
f,rh 10 the said declaration uus from my and al claim,
whatsoever the ofssi compsHsn % eh.f q
property drscrbcd thu,ia against said complainant
Ana further ordered aeludEed asd decreed dat e con-
as-ro ard assoc.s- comprising the SANTA Clara Mnins
Comsny bearing dsts the 2 Of January. lst be- and The sns
confirmed aEanst said complainant Tree Fon an
czms Of The rad cnansht, or either Of he ~ way Of ru''
otherwise
forth IN rid .nr.r o- Grove o. hhrrn and bis
associates banE the eth day of January, ls be- and the
!, hereby confirmed, free from all els' o the SAID com
pansnt, by way Of uus, OF otherwise , -, -
And ordered sdudGsd and scersed u'a the convey
AsreEo associates BY the .d John O. Christie hef
suorssy to gohn Cray and ss esaiisE date ,se 20 ss