New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-12-16

,nS proceed. ile primary fund for %. psyn.a, Of u:
20 ,rch ~ ~ s'rsisd ether stas Il not 70 Be
he S.. or pr "pSs ..G 5as Pn ~ .s.t
Vii Txses eurrsbt assessments s-ersins the rel
m H. ,r .rd ne, ~ rse :SecatiI :. ssss d "a. ..s
TIE prou entitled 70 the rents and prokts msst ssssy
chgse, IBIS rauTc, Nnosy 10 the piacgs thai tsssss
f,I Re 1. boeId 20 hep down such cAUsss
VII A. peruaneut improvements easfSes
s n. sn pr "a, az. not bound to sad.ir such cS.ls-
bat hy u.y either vance the snlssn OF pay DE u'srss' -
IN NOAin. S,sse Of any eSs.rSssSss r.%sin: 70, coz.
Mt. dated January iS4 fr seso payable TO Anssa o.
Eru 'l letter Se written simultaneously s.a
the ssre sheet Of psr-r with ,As instrument and from The
syid.Be IN h. sction 1t 10 usli., executed vita
Toe ere-'iOu ~ies tsf whetAer COAST
vsd claim piou.-0ry ss.as; the estate Of the
II Mr. Pbelr. instead executing thi. Instrument, hal ss.a
psncc :. r.yee hern si Of course would save hsss
v.id because would have heen eonsumm.ed By de
By,ry but under the x,,ax
hundrsd thousand dollars ~, promise to give aksaarcd
s 70 usse lin cannot enforced WAshss the rule =
consistent With natural equity would be OF little
user On srs SusioSed S1 tie learned JsSss Who ss,.ri
tie opinion in Harris al; Ci.lt constSsil bat Cor my
ey.r - an yery far from doubling Ito WELDON equity
uessrins It's equity by the tee. Of s e,mpG.'i'. saty
The c. A.i Il h.s been n. n'f.s. rule from tim.
d,musd Tor resgd hope rih 20 .-rve OF .ape,.'ss:
=. p s.rsSiencs OF leaned pr.c.
ted hoHsh Iona series OF time Tes rae declaring
hs lie the ~ other acts which ccnstu,e By tar the
proportion Of human coud9o ne subject mus, De con
b. iuFssbe Tor the law 10 teeITne y any ssn,Is ga
when p're promise 81, trugy 'sS9a ss s,,ss
in witch rsed. the drsEn BY hich was iahusocei
done. or in the conaue os life Of Laser whieA
adequate for revolving the pr.use The
interfere With The dspo.ition OF sny msss
AID compel. him 20 tahll eensaeeat DO
ahorfh prOam.t BY him and Sc, down IN wIitins than
pss aim to entertain indulge IN toe h.i IN, snse Of
than psl han 70 tel The Truth 70 be ssal TO MS een
hco TO dispense lsts and tresy to the needy out Of
the abundance Of bis po'se'.on The s~ treat. s these
duties beyond its province Sins hem 20 Lac .,
ob,. lon ispsrsei suy sel.,on to the eoecivs
thick Courts Of Ja.'os can alone e~rloy. -.
Il, .~ .m pie contract promise can only
b. ou The sround Of valuable considersiioa
is.ory note therefore vithoe confederation and Intended 10
mere s future period vad, either
ass ait ,rer r'ra, or as "a sin 1ert'' eds'a; . -
h. Court OF Equity In the adminisrs
,.n Of The estate WHERE there are aoandsn' e .h sw
defeated II mus, he rejected tor mere matter Of tora
cIpedieut insrpose defect. which from the
methods of proceeding peculiar to the common law would
the reforming in,rumens OF escbins or snp
prs.ns facts BY which ae,euiae The real nsrls olths
ustu nsice evidently demands But this authority e.er
e 1 ID to ave .sre to an instrument, merely be.
the construction given To IN Court OF Law eavesu
imperative To ssy thai Count OF Equity will act IN unit
sense to prevent pustce 10 conyeo,ion Of the rales
Of The common sw saying that can exercise sa m@y
Judicial d.crr like that Of the Athenisn Arcaon OF the NO
Prsor TOTS. Of course will not he pretended of evrfy
~y,r trow, ns. Cour. Of ESuy defer . ,e' 70 p,sss
III relates the subjects OF uri'c0n ane the methods OF
Court Of Equity will regard ns,runlen, valid
which the common law pronounces void nor viii H. ee
trust afford Ito aid to convert the instrunsns
into anything but what appears to be on its i.e .nd ,nas
defeat the intention Of the tes,sor bat
this would pusnan to such notions than defeat
ns nj. whole will II he to sian sknowdset
his will the presence Of witnesses and to c9ees. thee
ssns yen.ry ubrsrysad absolute power could make Il
Tbi Cont, therefore however reluctant the
vh and intentions the deoeden refuse 10 give effect
hsi,ber csn il be sustained as will codici This 10
scarcely ursed T. want. the indispensable applemen. t.,
stature snd the supported sanction cned BY virtue OF
paper Dec H. 1882 .enoush TO Say tha, only con
90 psym,nt administration, which could Do
enectus only with the consent ot oil the legee, best
decree be settled on tour days notice In accordance
!, ali vItber dirccons unl the coming the report
subject. which have Indicated as proper for reeao"-
B-for. Judge DAWES
| TAXATION or LUE INSURANCE COMPANIES -MAsDAnu
| AGAINST TBE BOARD OF suPERyisoHs
yisors If the County ot New-fort
This IL al app atom for msndaInus 20 ~ Board
Of Supervisor. them the VI tue resors
DAVIS Tbe grounds Of iii. application tina, the T.r
Con of the City Of Newfort have Inserted the
have assessed them Tor p.obal e.fse ia The
Til, has been returned 10 the sapei.of 9ftl
Cou1ty Of loIk have .eys.d snd corrected tho
me estimated AID asserted the TAI he f,aor' are 10 paJ
up .uch For that purpose the Supervisors have
b.ir a. nua eng ednesy 1t JaiT in ssoh
year Davies Laws pes sec ~ BY sec ~ Sns act thsy
in the collection the assessed TO he delivered 20 the
Receiver Taxes before the lst day Of sep'ombet
5.Send to The Receiver Take. sup,vi'o have
,ihr eor,ro over ne men, & o Ina ~
a,ory Th,h power o.. Mt and the wit issued and
hsy mere H., TO s sS 81 rS', %. Tss o .i.as:
osld not SO Under such Circumstances has been esPsy
s ~ cc SS IS Bah sc1 7is People ~ Supervisors Of
Greene County IL Barb, All The wsnsetded RUE fccos
xh,p il would be- Awaiting from want of power IN The DE-
sndsps perform toe repaired duty ~. ms,os' a.s
Rave doubt Il would be mPrope 70 '-ue u 10 ,hs case
t r.,rsor j. made 70 Them within sx months AFTER
o delivered 70 the Receiver OF Taxes 70 remit or 70
ne, are con.,u,d the Judges goodness. 81 tho
lsee % Davies Laws But seem, :. ne ,sse
CAP be- relieved q this It's provided by section Rev
o. sny esrPn.icp named IN sry sss..mest .bow
lion If the Hoard Superyisor, at their annual
.afsSi 10 b. hicd Win ibe CrI Of Board. that sueh
corporation is not in the receipt Of any prohts 81 aoo%e as
roll .nd no rs hal BE- imposed upon And the
o. h. capital from which such affidavit shall be received
sLa be- conclusive evidence that .nch coPoI'1n was 70
rie sbc TO sxion whether incorpoIsed on tho mutual
pIBP oherwise CD the epial me, have t.sly e,
Ind Mutual Insurance 60 81 Buffalo va saperyoIs Of
bic Cons, ~ suB hntn~i Ina 20 " hsy9f OF view.
Yok seldeB 2i The People tho relation q tho halusi
Lie ms Co the Board Of Supervisors u New fort ~
Barb Sl) Now has declared In the empbsc
sn.rAs that II tn affidavit fnrnAed required III.
corporation shall be erased from the ss.ssn-nt roll snH
20 upon IT, Ii b. true therefore that the
ale ssd stthe time this ass@ssnent vts,
the rscep, 81 any profits incom" from tbs csPd
this Slate, then bs dnty OF
the pr Per Of corporation TO hsys ushed such e.
61ay had the VI The oorpgsiion siruef from Vi:
,Lt roll IL .ueb adav bsd been furnished s.d
III superyrs rad omitted 10 discharge their duties IN the
treuises wit Of usrdtmu- would have besn me proper
r. uecY
Qubss tkt lis 6Keayi shall be fufnisbsd az the ansa
wien the rolls Teysc4 snf corfoetS
xLu lfh.l ekH. si-r Oh. Ie.9Mlarn9