New-York daily tribune., 1856-06-10


Jsdse Coz aired hA, sebsnEe cause he bad pres
Cd ar for pfine al cause snd oeed no. be %
yopd h,So the sbty aud ono who cSa.ci. .nld
Eel ,uenstioa to decide questions Of i, M quo dsres
vihou. ing ed BY ulienor con, dss bs pre.
.o4d De difficult rot i%po.ss ~SspS sesn the matter
sspecy coueponsd with the raSle rv .vod the d
es,, II, %s n .,s where emony ,s,
,s Iey esSeD1s se$ eppo.. Svs
n itr srniry human m'S. 1 @ 40 far a. 70 beco ne
sns :, ..ss he where 1s Of an e..
sans ese bad % ms S :, osS be srrssed when thai
s In the uoder consideration he we're may CIR ,h
,se and % pr..iOn oFniOL e'pees' in comm unity
o1s hy e OF is.se ZONE Q, ,ns ~ pore oms o bos
so were pr.,en the time when he received ms aess
.oo,S and -sS ssgs OssI Of the E Inc wounded
with ball IL bic heart the immense % 'a1et ,h ,b
sh Of one o persons cLarsed With he homcde across the
ss 50' rSs.sa sG S ons S h
oan.. before his obeGuent ptose,ed
.,sasy SS u. hh saten "" wi es
speeches q the counsel and OF tee ana so
these should have led 70 the form ,ion and en
., S pt the e1eOs ns. OF who rssd the
sewspspe That there srons and 3. bu' universal ,sn-
.c. apparent from the statement
s who III S, IL. e.t hsd both form and
opinions the alleged guilt Of hs prisoner and still
.ret examination wa. 80 that they could
fair % ss OF the sOe e,nSS ueS
Tn. who admitted all have been
Se.d ohins soy them except insnuasn by
the ey the argument which they were not
sseis,on Of The motion which Is now undef c,nsdefs
& u sy S @ ssSs isiS
that similar result future attempt could not be reason
ars. Ss are !. !. .d@iS right Challenge t~.ny
snptoy which our law. be1isny secure to tired ior
the selection Of the jury 10 cases wher. all or ts
pGroS % s. 81 SGf pv.ss esDDot opess but
quite that where but ncoq numbers
on, oS.nct ,Se course Of justice In this case wasn the
t. wa. before me bu, three jurors were
ssa aroIs were peculiarly acceptable to the asie1asot:
that with Of the and had in
eaepee them However sn bound to consider the posi-
o. ssG s Of III. soa soSd e possG IN
New Y%l IL would probably be ws before 3. to
ised and :uI@oEsd considerable na%b- Of dy: must
least under be permitted 70 'eps
rate and to minse With theI fellow citizens without any
Sith others on the subject Of the trial may be obeyed
one sworn .. juror who s rot CONGREGATIONS man and as
70 such there be security Besides no espon'
their Opinions and support them in the hearing Of the
Ys9% efsSe ann pw e thu similar dc
neuty occur Jurors are permitted TO separate during the
duoe practice trial. murder in the City Of New York
.evss warned by tn. Judges Of thai District
then think scarcely any state Of ccu@stsnces
particularly of the nfrm, and Of those extensively en-.
s,d in gin, ; .. Sn sy 5sS1sl s s vee S%
The practice of thus npg them wou operate very ioari
%ou ,ess ss II. al on s for Iurde Tns sePaon
during evidently inst that the danger resulting
,s Of Which wOU Increase i the s should
POse be vCed In this case a. rs 10 oe sS
jury and st more so to Obtain one BY which far inpSs
AthOue q sufficient number OF qualhed jurors might
possibly be friends Of those who might have formed ex
the .!o2s ss'.s PsS sen Tim me9t InT. must be
be ehsFed dsard it, ba, hy cannot do hat with all their
Efforts Daring exoerience Of may years do not
80. msnt TssVIoy and generally sSc~n hst
has been and sometimes is viii probably lead T.
would result disagreement and the trial thus prove a6or
hi. .ction Ssce uoon verdict resulted from the effect Of
public opinion upon the minds Of OF the hu b9r aoi
1% rSn'Pi but % 20, reliance
that There is sufficient without TO warrant t9e COZ
iel OF tbs action be had IN and ha 'he''
The f TIE delsnaaat McLSas, eoneode thai ne
ae'n shoul Of be ssn nio ano her count, 'i mo-, ns
H. Gun Of New Yrk ~ un6caSe ediy true thai 70 tho
Al or &c any manner which would axe hi T. oT, |
n e'id nee fatsuy oPi ns have be ~ ,," ' oe w ooa.
Bu then whom charged as a. aelSe "' r'. 1 a. .r,
oily wltn al crc toreSer must mposl segr,9s
a.,o sn ard IL woaid di.lu'lhy p,Io'd p bs SeS. J.
,,t se,ss., .wLjT.s I'm his wok the Plea q the
c,on * s9 s31S hat tho exc p,on to au ndcor eo3i
",aue l. ,ilhor ia question OF h'rpe", - oe
70 th~ Sui Of on associate would eNclude n9r w' sn,i
by he soIet@r Court in tle Gee OF 'n' '9cay ~ % &
ns Gir aHd unpreuJocd Jury n New loIN 20 Try -'"s '
the d,'encauts.
1t seems fu the affidavit Of Baksr that he has large n1m
be- who anf unable 60 bear the eNp7's
ebasilS tae ace OF tra puI th.reb,
l4
direction wei foIrded. e ne emitted 10 srea cusiet
siin The de- enisn should De deprived of ay
t events have fair u shall thrrs'ore Ton sense o
uasn,s rsele thai the District Attorney sha make sails
fact " tor the psyent By the to"u'y o. Ne"
,uoreoa,d by or ou behalf ot drf daat o.. either Of
se ro, sd a. r'i, ,tnct In ~ sch an sr,slae.
men. CD ne that change Of tac pic' Of n II
Nis often the Innocent accused tha tas tnn
,hor Boz Who're -'S an hc " less ar9 Ao~. tud lh's
ritul moe b. portut ta h 'h,ir f.'r sa'nd i'i'd '
tsSsce..Sy loe to ,sy aa, ono ..sl ioins,A h. H.
the shfo'' decree t.e se e eh's er Of New N"h Jaofs
toub,ct bat hy tc those rc-tel f,u ,h- eurs. trc
ercuso o, BY tc auhis ,u, vhea that ~.o'e
foluel sul teroio. E.nerl} Known
cosagy .hs1 be selc ted sud .o ih- a.'45 9. acare
~tcb me-, teoe a., cha ee should cs Gr more remote
-, ho lo.ld be sc.cc th a. th, case y, t'' .aa.
ard 'bs Al Counties AMI tne ire cfcr a'n Of th. os"s
Jep'Fs OF &C. city in "a vicilt' have cu et @ eN
rcd,, ec 'f nmsut ana he e' he' e'''s'a-. =. =
TAR ard unsrd u''l iu s'y a. 'ai county g d 'e very
si'a "e.' IT,. ,.;., ~ ,,,,',, l-s.s.a-~, ia,
C.afy Suaok ed ptr1D lar ool '- ~'s 'is'i 'o
COINS M hc pr,.-s1to1 ed r ts defendants, oha ssu s.
mutual o.a,eut i-sis.a = some other eoua'' . 90.
pssr, ou Le %, he 6rst eia-ne.ri 90 ~
H. d,ies III Bassr ,he prevalence u, rn'l aal eN1 s.
oiia,u- s.o-s rA- many -ro who hsd os i'n'as 'ni
a. ana 'le l1,ea,o.s "hca We hc'roy ~ ee ,a
sforr &C.. tt'rt as t' ao slt or innocence i ,