Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-15

NNAAA tAA AAA( az . GNN1ANtf -
Term, according to the place
Under the above Rules the
trial during the first week Of I
CASES AT JAM
lSt Week.
l Den lessee vs.. Malloy;
2 Seay vs.. Cameron;
3 Morrow vs.. Napier;
s Stanfield VS.. same;
3 Pointer vs.. same;
6 Flowers vs. same;
Z Kirkman VS.. same;
s Travis VS.. Wallace;
Q Lawrence VS.. Nashville 4
II llsborO' Turnpike Co;
10 Shelby VS.. Martin;
ii Same vs.. Wetmore;
~ Winston vs.. Fields;
13 Walker VS.. Bales;
II Mayor and Aldermen ol
Nashville exparte;
IS Young vs.. COrbett;
16 Doe lessee VS.. Ray;
IL GJRdey use &c. vs.. Mar.
shall;
is same vs.. same;
2 Baldwin vs.. Elliott;
o. Mpsley vs. Gillian;
21 Brinkiey VS. McD0le;
22 York \ Co vs.. Mckenzie;
20 McCampbell VS.. Bell;
"a same vs.. Bell A Rnbards;
2S Doe lessee vs.. McEEeR;
26 Jasper ct al Va. Barns;
q LaWhorn vs.. Davis;
23 Sloan vs.. Haskell;
20 McGavock vs. Gilman
81 Mctiavock & Co VS.. same
81 Jones vs.. Mitchell;
81 Mayor and Aldermen OF
Nashville exparte;
SO State Of Tennessee use
&c VS.. Smell ct al;
81 McCampbell vs.. Clemons;
IS Jackson's Ex'rs VS.. Gil
bert & Son;
So Charlotte Turnpike Co VS..
Spence;
~ Cross VS.. Green ct al;
IS Evans q Smith VS.. Shivers
ct al;
80 Forehand &c vs.. Farrell:
40 Chileutt VS.. Mcintyre;
IL Martin VS.. Armstrong;
AZ Crunk VS.. James;
43 Charlotte Turnpike Co Us
Spence;
~ Fay va. Sloan;
As Ayres a Matthews vs.. Cd
bert;
90 Hyde vs.. Maddox;
~ Davis VS.. MOseley;
IS Charlotte Turnpike Co.
VS.. Spence;
40 Hughes VS.. Gilbert;
81 Alien vs.. GoOurich;
81 Frazier vs. steamboat To.
ledO and owners;
SO Goldberg vs. Hinton;
5S Harris vs.. Smiley ex'r;
81 Bank Of Tennessee VS.
Greene ct al;
IS Mckee adn'r vs.. Noel,
'6 Same Ys. Same,
81 Bank Oi Tennessee VS.
Newsom;
IS McGavcck vs.. Paul {. al
80 Same VS.. Tucker et a.;
I'd week.
60 Wilson eX'rx vs.. GoodWin
ct al;
81 johnson rs. Ratcliffe;
81 same vs.. 0rtOn et al;
% Manufacturing Company
VI. HubDs = Henly;
Ga Lowry vs.. Dabhs;
6o Adelphi Theatre Co rs.
Greene;
sc Harrison & Richardson vs
Boiling q Stra,ton;
81 De La Vergne vs.. Dodge;
6S Martin vs.. Ensley;
% Williams & Hitchings ".
Glover 4 Boyd;
1n Rell VS.. Davis;
II L 4 \ Railroad Co VS.
n. O. Love;
70 same VS.. Walker;
70 same vs.. Gee;
"a same VS.. Maynor;
IS same vs.. Sledge;
76 Martin VS.. Fussell ct al;
II McEwen, use &c VS. Nor
ton ct al;
Is Watkins vs.. Barns;
20 Nance vs.. Moore ct al;
81 Pa quett vs.. Austin;
81 Shegog vs.. Roberts, Rd'T;
81 Sloan eX'rx VS.. Halle;
So Carmichael vs.. King ct al;
81 Hail y vs.. Wetmore;
SIS Wilkinson, ct al vs.. Clin-
ard;
Sc Eatherly vs. Vinson;
81 Morse h Son vs.. Hess;
IS Nash & Char. Turnpike
VS.. Spence;
SO Bell trustee vs.. Me Donald
81 Bell trust, e VS.. Slmuels;
81 State Of Tenn, use, &c +,
VS.. Dodd;
90 Dotson admir- &c vs. Dabbs
% Smiley vs.. Demoss ad'mr;
"a Childre,s W. jackson;
90 Greer VS.. Jordan;
90 Hammer VS.. Carroll, ag't;
81 Ament vs.. TaylUr;
- DeLahay vs.. Lawrence;
90 Cunningham vs. M'COmbs
& nelius.
100 Mclaughlin vs.. kimi'ro;
l0l French VS.. duncan, Nor
gan 4 Co;
log Lowe admir- v5. Sloan;
lU3 TaJ lor W. S Boat Beauty
et IL, /
l0s Gilman vs.. KlmbrO; ]
l05 MattheWson vs. Philips; .
lr6 Kimbio vs.. Watson; }
1OT Steel IS. l. RRCo;
los buchanan VS.. Joseph; .
100 Nancy trustee vs. Bigley;.
ITO Demoss admir- vs.. Russ-ll
ct al; (
Ill Scales vs.. Tenn. and Ala. I
Railroad Co; (
l12 Looney vs.. GriEzard;
ll3 Burger vs.. Brien; K
ia Austin VS.. Ha,s;
| 5 Bland vs.. Boiling; [
ll6 Boyd vs.. " OOdwari ct all
III B'k of Tenn vs.. McNairy
ct al
itS Bells ex'r vs.. Blk Of Tenn
ll9 Bank Of Tennessee VS.
Mclaughlin; I
l20 Jackson vs.. Bell; Z
III Anthony, jr., vs. Jackson;
l22 Beech vs.. Pointer Use &C. /
vs.. Bell; 1
1928 Baker vs Jackson.
la Bowen ct al vs. Steven (
son ct al; <
l25 Brunson et al vs.. Hick (
man et al;
1876 Bank, Planters VS.. Hud (
son;
i2I Bolton et al vs. Kimbro; (
l2S Berry, use &c. ~. Foster /
admir-
1919 Garter vs.. Hamilton e. al
$50 Chiidress ys.Iohnsoo ct ali
lat Same vs.. DCcx Jones ct ali
1872 Same W. Jacs son et al; I
LIS Same VS.. Owen ct Al;
1874 Collins vs.. Gregory;
i23 Couss, ne vs.. MouniE;
l36 Cartwright vs.. Smell ct al
lST Chayous W. Dickinson Ell.
al; 4
lss Douglass ". Turnpike Co
lS9 Dlekey IS Manufacturing
Company [
40 Demoss vs.. Bell; +
l4l Fanning v. Bartlett: 4
l42 FIRING Va. Zimmerman etli
al; B
I4s FRrrs vs.. Hundley; p
Ia Foster, trusee vs.. Mel
Marry; L
I45 Goodwin vs.. Paul et al
80 Gree ndeld A Co. - Man.
ufact1ring Company. i
~ GlsaFSs Il al Va. Jackson
et Al; i
~ Gray ". Holt, agent;
~ Glover vs. Telegraph Co;
I'D Week. :
50 Chbdress ". Mayor 4 Al
dcrmrn " Nashville; Z
81 Driver vs.. hitchings;