Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-05

z parties 20 such causes may
ance viii be required
ore be, the duty OF The Clerk in
sses 10 summon them 10 at
rd or fourth Monday Of the
he eau e stands on the docket.
causes viii stand for
le term:
AIRY TERM, 1875
.l53 Letehsr vs. Hudson;
.l54 love vs., Slsap;
ia5 Moore VS.. Hughes;
I5S Merritt VS.. Benson e. al:
.l57 shacklstt vs.. Gilman;
.l5S Stewart vs.. Edui0ndsOn;
no State Of Tenn use &c IS.
Russell et al;
100 Treadway & wife VI.
Goodwin admir-
t61 Wallace vs.. Acklin:
i62 Thompson tru vs. Tenn.
and Ala. Railroad Co;
1853 Williams rs. Glover;
t64 Beatty va. Clodfelter;
les TiIlmsn vs Williams;
10; PetWsy W. Wilson ct al;
l67 Dunn vs. Kreider;
its fem. and Ala. Railroad
Co VS.. Marlin;
100 Shute vs. n 4 c Railroad
Co;
40 Ewing trustee vs. same;
III n 4 c Railroad, Co vs..
Donelson.
It72 Lauier 4 Falls VS.. VanlieT
l73 Livingston VS.. Nah. Gas
Light Co,
ia Gilman vs.. Wright:
iT5 Lanier & McNickie vs.
Ysniier:
lT6 Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
l7T Young VS.. Summerhill;
Is Corporation Of Nashville
VS. RsyfoTd;
.tT9 Same VS.. Hig gzins;
1871 Same v Raiford;
81 Same VS. Same:
.lS2 Same v Hamilton;
.IS3 Goff VS.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &c.
ga Cru'chei vs.. Foster
IS Childress vs.Mammel ct al
I26 Cantr. ! VS.. Sloan;
lsT Doe. lessee. VS.. Waggo-
! IS brigham vs. tratton ct al;
ls9 Same VS.. Craighead;
l9O Same vs. Hsvs et al;
1qf Bacchus vs.. Potter;
t9 BoSley VS.. Welch
J SO Co'e VS.. Mayor and Al
dermen OF Nashville;
1874 Davis VS.. Bradley:
1876 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee, VS.. Hin
ton;
81 Glover 4 Boyd, use &c
VS.. Jollett;
i9s Goldberg 4 Co. VS.. lnsu-
rance Co.
1919 Harris VS.. Pitts:
'20h Hays VS. Edmundson ct 81
nj Horn and wife vs.Stewart,
2 2 Lellyeti 4 Ewing vs.. Mills
4 kgan;
.2n8 Hoilins VS.. Ry man ct al;
Pa Hallowell 4 Go W. Hu
POO Hammond 4 Co. W. Lu-
cas- ct al;
3n6 Housley vs. Hagan ct al;
,07 heke & Bro. v. jackson;
2US HamWell vs.. Telegraph
Compa y
l209 Jnhnson VS.. VooTe et xl,
p 0 James a Co. ys. owen ei
al
III Insurance Company ".
Peck e al;
lli2 J-nkins vs. Bu,h II al;
Z 8 Kerby ys. Brockw 5;
IA IiDsry W. Bridge Co.;
2 5 Mex inney Ns Shelly;
lZ16 McCaDpbell, trustee VS..
Hicks ct al;
l2lT Same vs.. Mar;
lis Mc. ntosh vs.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
PIG Nara vs.. Insurance Co.;
90 Malloy W. Turnpike Co.
III NJ Roberts It al VS.. Jack
son;
I222 Oldham VS.. Pau. ex'r;
~ PetwAy VS. Cruicher e, al.
IA Pope vs. Washington.
4fh week.
l225 Mining Company We.
Mitchell et al.
l226 Murrell vs.. MA,Or and
Ald'mn Of Nashvi ,le;
i22T MinneIt 4 WhcoOp vs..
McCombs et NJ;
22s Morgan q Co. vs.. Vick-
| house;
229 Mills VS.. Stewart;
I230 Mart n vs.. Beatty;
l23l Murrell & Matlock rs
Tenn q Ala. r x. Co;
l9s2 Owens ". johnson;
,,l33 POrterfield VS. Beatty;
I234 Stewart & Go. vs.. Hume;
l23S Same W.. Bowhnl;
1876 samueis. by next iriend
vs.. Mayor q Aldermen OF
\ Nashville;
2 7 Shegorg Vs. Simms;
23S Wright vs. Drenshaw;
.2ig m'nrTman %. McNairy;
240 Bank Of Tennessee VS..
Ham ton ct al;
24t CsmuSe VS.. Patterson;
242 State Of Tennessee IS.
WilSin son ct al;
2 8 Bell vs. helch;
24I Guthrie and wife W..
Rains;
345 Jordan vs.. Davidson;
246 Porter v BeTgan.
24T LIVINGSTON " Mayor and
Aldern en- o. Nashville,
2is Barns ys. Gilman;
2 3 Rains W. Williams;
$50 rhildress ". Oven;
lZ5l Corporat on OF Nashville
vs.. Hamilton,
252 8 me VS.. II ggins;
-, B Same VS. fnn;
II54 Same vs.. Gurnand;
3 BAilentine W.. brown;
$50 WoOCf.lk vs.. n. and G.
Rsilroad Co;
.257 Mayor & Ald'men Nash
vile exparte;
25s Mayor a Al mn OF Nash.
vile exparte;
lS59 0lds vs. McFadden;
l260 Campbell VS.. Cfenshsw
1t vi,
lSs1 Corporation ". Moore;
l262 Morrison vs.. Graham;
.68 SAME VS.. same.
"a SAME vs.. same;
l26S Same W. same;
26 Same vs.. same;
81 Same ". same;
IS Pinktrton ys. orensi aw
et al;
2 . Smith 4 Go. ". Same;
2T0 Same vs. SAM;
l27I same va. same;
IzT2 sAme vs.. ssms;
279 Childress vs.. Hampton
et al;
.2T4 Jones vs.. Nance;
.z7S LeAkv vs.. harell;
.21e Frey et al W. knight etAi:
2T7 Jackson ". Bell;
2fS Dodd vs. Henry a Skinner
2Ts Pope rs Washington;
9s same " same;
2~1 Same vs. same;
2st Peek A Bliss W Morton;
2s3 Pointer " Bell;
2s4 Papia vs. Voiz0t;
zs5 Pe K vs. Garter et el;
'sS6 Paris ys Jackson
81 Sesy, trustee vs. Tarpiey
a Pyle;
Yss shute ys Bigley,
2>9 stevens W Hamilton et Al
290 shute W Hadiey ct al;
81 same W Williams tt a.;
292 Van Dyke, Adin'rNsPeAil
81 ~ HuldrUn W ScrugRs;
. o. WErrarth " Casey;
IS Whits0rth W Sea.gny et
Al;
96 Kes' W Rrown;
s9T Warren " UniJn Bsnk;
o. Aliord ys Scales ex'r,
1s9 4leEves e. al admir- W
Roach rt 81;
Bon Same Y Goodirtt ct Al;
S'ii same " ksst et Al;
3 3 Wits n "a Carter;
8 3 Whfaemsn " Garter.
80s IADieT a MeNickle W
Ewing. Diek 4 Co,