The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-01-03

.ts
Clarendon 70 eexamne the trssties o. 100 ano anu ~
% the history Of the time in which additional proof h.
ton Of the construction placed upon these ueau' W o
Il would , have been interesting as historical fact to
learn A. what ume ne'rly osy yeass $50 a.,
reamstAnces and upon What sfu ere.t br'san again
entered Mesquite alter having acknowledge the
eregny OF spain over In 1893 and fso ana surrendered
Il 70 that power. aa,fa a.L
The british TO aege that since the peace
Of 1910 ord Spain bad never raised question with the bt
ah government respecting the Mosquito protectorae This
doubtless the because Old spain, from the intimate
relations OF friendship which had existed between The two
governments since their treaty OF alliance IN 1902 could not
have suspected that treat Britain Was renewing her connsx
ion With the Mosquitoes and soon after the acts committed
by her nearly forty the spanish American reyo
the spanish government from betowng its attention on
matter 90 comparatively nnmportant Il !,
Mexico OF 1926 Great Britain had recognised the the
Central American States having achieved their nnepend
ence, the territories respectively included within their
boundaries these bad formerly existed under od spain
As this point has been discussed in former portion Of the
present statement not 70 add thing TO
what has already been said
But again, the British statement even suppospg
that these States did inherit the rights OF Old SPAN they
made no remonstance or many years after the ptoecto
known to them"
Surely the British government does not mean to contend
that the omission Of these feeble States sgtated in the
first place. by revolutionary war, and afterwards by 40
upon Great Britain the right to deprive them their terri
tory? Besides II necessary go into the question
elapsed before these States did against the
croachments OF Great Britain.
The statement next asserts that although the
the United States in 1872 knew OF the existence OF he
British protecorate yet they did not complain OF y
lsao. Ana nom this what Is 70 be inferred Inc United
ntefer ~ this question until April 1900 but even they
had been directly interested IN the territory as catagu
was, Is there any statute o. LIMITATIONS among nations
which after SIX years OF unlawful possession depes ,he
true owner 81 his territorial rights a !,
dad the United states IN TINS question pore ne
conclusion OF the convention Of soo TINS could only NAYS
Deen gone under he monroe doctrne ana then tney
,eu, ~, NM @ ey oei aaa ae ,b de-
'aa. inns apc.ne can only De y me
um o. the dislngusneu parsonage VINO deiyeree W pu
her government cannot admit that doctrine as an
axiom Whcn ought % regulate he conuu' y
European states: e., a.
nv. y must not DC lneirea from what nas pssh ,n M
M.nou nis ooh'ehoh TIE goyehmeht " wy asea ne
woaid not nave eventually nierierea, an opeuisnce 70 m
Monroe doctrine 70 prevent possible any portion q ven
ua America from Deing permanently occupies OF
oy ureat britain; -. ~,
eitheI oia oiarenuon correot % shpposihg .has M
doctrine but the mere dictum OF its distinguished au
thor True has never been formally sanctioned by Con
gress Dut when " 81 announced more ihan Unity ~
II was hailed with enthusiastic appreciation by the Amei
can people ana since that period dinerent fresiuen.s on
ne unteu states nave repeated ~ ID lneir ~
10 ana Always WIN y pu'
the occasion required Mr. buchanan would eneeriaily
unae .ne .ask q .he WISDOM anu po.y
WEI, I'll, ~ 20 an1se y. .ne amesican cont'nent t.
me priisn s,as'nei. % s ~
repoie y 70 .ae ~ NY ICY, ~
~ answers wers Ietsheu ~ .ne sorer W ~. rs 49,;
STATES " APPcas auo " u on usna'i VI ene
sua ~ oo insei u enIo ~ es' 'he Ptos'e'' "
= 10a. - ioe' -, rr,.a CO..
sney .ne Wat enen penang between ahe on,ea
anu - ~ aocoui' ~ Inns
sion, wi.ou. " ay " ''e Pb'eeu
ny H., s hl M; - ., 60 si bv treaty.
o peace, ana yer Ine o. can Juan py ne blsn
.es ssiusn' oA ~ apil,' iofo, Rne Pupo Pse
" wy oiu' y sa9ng ~ ms aane 49, ~ wy
a. ne nsu aeaoy uohe IN wv
gobs'es " ehape n'n :. se,u minissc W anu
~. hlhser WIS aee,oianpy VIII ~,
when hate aeen Puosneu, nasng uia.eay y, @
a"oPs,on ~ cas1ie' uSNe'.Ay " give ene'' W WIS "oee
IN Uehtrh america. 80 !,
Inc Drush statement, whist admitting ,na upuet tne
iormer plneP'es any prAcncs o. european na.ns ~
20 lpe aeasal W 'ne Inuian IAoss .ne ~
nave no riSnt ~ IuhN AZ az lnaspehuens
shAt urea, nfisan nas uhahReu heI cohuuct ~
examples o. grea. changes IN oner tespee,s Woe
occurred ~ n,oosn nes, nhu as an eAeuse o' l
s'on o. .pe nisisn slave usae aAa .he " e
fepuohc OF ie'a Nenner nese soua epp,n - oe e'5
woncerui. iney onlh occorrea 20 .ne ha.ua
eseh, from .ns haNance 11 anu tne eno NJ
pave performer miracle, ~ thsy can convert ihs aspaseo
anu race on Mosquto ino'ansr sucu ne neY
peen described Without chuaoicton IN me
men INTO cufeh OF SUBJECTS OF reay iaosPenueh' auu
sovereign nat,on' -, ,.,
ihs brush statement ahob necints 70 iWnsh -tne
grounds on whioh hsr he)s government hsne tne cap
tnre OF san Juan DC Nlca aqua ana ms heelo seatee
~ necessary 70 pursue TINS orhneh " ,ne suoJct
u would De easy 10 ADD proofs 10 those contained IN te
former American statement that TINS was never Mosquo
port any sense but always ,ogether VIVID tne San
Juan rghtLuy belonged 70 SPAN ana afterwards 70 NC,
ragua Reference might De made 70 the report OF Cur VIZ
liam WISE the commander OF the BRUSH sophia
Who visited bs coast IN ls2v and also 10 that OF Mr. oando
Roberts who was carried q. prisoner up the san Juan 70