New-York daily tribune., 1856-03-26

she vs. psusst q Cs,ary caurh sss knew de p.r... %
hs sei that .nss b, marriage VITA p.nus ds-sdsss -
s & o,s .a hs' she Love. tne- hss
hG ore 'h ScISSs.s w b., h nos hired sso.
knou~ shA th,i kno~ Of whsn hirsa hini 70 r,h - -
fndsnt: when spoke u csrtsn him wanted a, ~
'nd fo.se fnd who ihey tsssa 70 u,sss sssss
ri>' d od him hat Othess day. wosd sse ths "
sest Ssls Of eounteeers be did not nsne. -
Jane o. Ma Cox to bin then and wbep went VIII his
n o9y sss Der . S1. & 20 % s Ia 90 10. t'c- ss- leg
At the bonss No IS Wooster asd the dovery IA
whom he lad wah Der to No ss wooss ssrcsss
! .sset b N what lind 0i . hoc.s e .si -
wss hoo. sOla csrssrt to 80 bach 70 DE
soose ard watch 70 see s: nas os, and ua vhs
= h. nors as be stood on Ii. corner .h lady psed s.1
hoa.. n snd thea for he sr. de-
latter part Of Arrii ~
ssmiDed-o You Aes.n this crusade .s.ia. ,h. .x
By eonneonns eet " h ssus Of oeunterfsi,ers msrs
TOOK that nsae' q" speak Of the subject to Csrhsrt for
Mary Gr'e rees;lsd q Did you hear Mn. Cor ssy asp
thing psn abe bad Ossed q setting DR. Cox f hu.s.s
they hsl sought c exclude forty wes. rs s, S,s ss
to :how Dr. Cox; efforts to get . wife lLsOsAtsfl
AneE hsy ~,ss ere g.5isd ed s As A.. .y-s
o. Aboui lie time they separated da a asissaas .ls 10
VS. that her hushssd Of he best vi.s a. s-s
Mr. schsssr~f was In hopOs tAa. would b ..,.A s..
sstrs what EN- about to- iwsnt TO show that s deenAssk
VA
femse-not the use combned with indecent scss
-ele,.,ins ber clo,hlss and showing her private.
Nj uesd-suea language - you have usod an 'nss 70
MI seasser-YOu vasabOsS. or you would ssv
Nj Gesr, Is an iurd, thi. Court to the council, s.1
70 thtse ladies' "d you ought to be kicked OF cst
Mr. schdstr-l don't wish to be in.olted BY counsel
The Courf there repetition OF such remarks betwcs9
them, shs send the seatlemen out Of Court.
!hOm,' Besns 'rOrn-,I Ire, reside G in & Ssw.YOti s...
ago net him irequery no Wa ellen, OF Mr. LSinsseesy
ycsy good consider him credible witnoss would b.svs
John Stephenson swor reside at No II King streets
AID eight months sether under Mt Senior,
f1 cos iS% % s .ou &. S
puIIs ,he month Of March .' did yOe zee ts'endssf
Jersey City Ferry she had from Jsey car.
Mr. wns.s: IN the % s;:e ,s, rSS have bee:
that have got In tho Of securing their sseadasss
The Cour-whsi you propose prove BY yosr rcm.ss
There one witness however whose attendance =
secure b, whom We propose to prove The posy. adultery
fore she had ased from her husband The witness was
Ts conT"i do not tbni Il would be discreet to open s
subject upon that pon the particular act not ALLEGED y
the petition mast apply tho same rules here that do u
The case then closed with reservation Of four wsess
character each side. TO bc introduced this moosss
The Court then Adjourned
SUPERIOR CoURT-TslAL TEsn-Msrch ,a-Befors judge
BoswosrH
Henry A. Williams 's The Ssw-f0's Floating Dry Dock
The plaintiffs claim under lease from the Corpors-
ssa Sn Ps sa Ss Tsy :, O. The M
obstruction Of their rights TO whsage upon the wssexV
Doe ost attached &. SasSs.s pier:
whereby the approach o. vessels to The wesey .e Of per n
~ prevented, and hs damaged TO the amount of $as
That the plaintiff has no rights over the buLheaA which 10
leased which tho structure
attached
That the claims should have been for wharfage. II anydsS
That there OF computing damage, sinoe
matter of guesswors for the Jury TO tr 70 toll wh
wharfage would have been received by the plaintiff but tor s
obstruction.
ceyed that the question issue afec the respective rights d
whsr bukbead owners
the Jury should find oer the evidence all In upon he
question subject the opinion Of the Court ups.
bulkhcad had DO more night to interfere with the sooss.
enother mans pier than to NIL up the whole dip -
near could be without touching the pier itself
MARINE coURT,M.scn = Bsio,. JudSs & &Msc:s.ay
william sshon.chs her sst tho came.
These action. were brought against the defesda.s
the following circumstances: The plaintiffs aiess that
S the ie' desnSsS o. 10 procure msS 70 se 70 =
enlisted In the British service for the Crmea tor which do
houd tave procured 100 men, obtain them Lisute.
ants commissions in tho British Amy-ths plaintiffs claim thai
they fulfilled their and that the defendants did sot
cbOn the commissions promised snd Indebted to thor. re-
frecvey months salary beside Incurred f
claimed lespectiys Tho
arcD Hr Barclay only who sppesrsd BY Charlie. Edwards esq.
Who inerposed Ilea to the Jurisdiction the ground OF tho
and Produced his ezguafv claiming exemption from liability h
Jones B. Phillips esq for the PLAINTIFF asked sdjovrs-
muihe privilege f existed, one the defendant hsd
FIGHT either avail himself OF 70 waive. An eser decsse
uIoH the merits Of the could be arrived at ia this ribuoaa
then could be obtained the plaintiffs driven to enss
conflict of opinion whether Consals exempted
IL had been held that the prveg extended only Embads
The defendants counsel claimed that the question had bees
denvely settled IN the Court OF Appeals ia the -
Vasrno vs. Thompson, ID Sedsns SIG, which he reed 10
Mccarthy j. held that the law settled By that decss
The plaintiffs ust resort to their romedy tho Unissd sstss
Court This Court has no jurisdiction msst
be dismissed without costs.
SUPREME COURT-sp.cIAL TERn-MARcH 2s-BeSsss
Judge DAVIES.
John s. Mallory agt. Mary B Mallory.-Order -
sh &C.. discharges without costs TO either party
Henry Hector agt Michael j. Madden, &c.-Ms-
ton TO chars place Of trial granted costa Of motion. Sc -
abide event Of the action.
Aug. H. Novsle, &C., agt. Alex l.. Holgste, 60
Motion denied, with : 10 costs.
In Cbsmbers-Before Judge bAvEs
John PIitcbsrd, &C., agt. Rufus Story.-Aotion fer
Nathan Richmond agt. Vim. ii. Rowland, &c.-Or-
der for discovery granted.
HEw-YoRK SUPERIOR coURr-n.rch 25-Befors tss
Hon Justice DvEs.
Duncan sst. Rsthbone.
Tbe an action brought by the plaintiff against the
deeudant-both Of whom minors-in which the pantu
claims 500 dsnsses for certain sssed wrona indicted ~
the defendant working her under garment with pictures %
grs and then Wrapping clean paper and sddrssos end
delivering it 10 her. and that she, not howns Us eosseat
tie case considerable length setting plsins
uTies Defendants counsel then moved fo dsnisssl q hs
antsegne that did forth the seb sueisst
10 stituts cause Of scon The judge however lsw~k
the plaintiff ~ proceed with biz reservns the oeeods.rs
objection. The plaintiffs counsel then procee1se
his and L. 3