New-York daily tribune., 1856-07-18

IN ,yyyrna He did not cay that If any wroag bsd
ne.n dons 10 the Government of the United Sates,
bad been covered BY an aposSy On .ss e'ntlsay, aa
and truth. ths. the apology offered 10 the uared
states Government bad always been conGo"na
apology, and Was Dot an aP iogy tnat iinPnea OF ~
NIT. that o wrong had been done peeaase nel
iesty's Government, having been fully conscious tnat
thew had done no wrong, had not offered an aph1gy
that supposed that wrong hsd been dene dsarl.
Nv rigkt hon. friend stated these were the sPosS'es
that had been made. They have been re2eatea IN
various dispatches. Tbey all run 10 one torm ihe
Blifh Goverpm.ut ut would regret deeply if, either
intentionally or unmtentionslly, they have done
wrong TO America. Bu, they have not done wrong
70 America Hear, hearl. II no wrong had oe-n
done grant you that ,s an ,h.s spS'v you'd be FRANK
e, herous al concstoy step, going Us near as pos
-ible TO meet the views Of the American government
But if wrong has been done, such an apoiosy Is NO
apology at al Hear, hearl. Whether wrong nas
DC. done ID sreore, is the question upon When We
bsye TO fa back. maintain that il q TIm 's oeen
done that wrong has not been stoned for ny the sf
gy Let me coy TWO things, which VII sno zen my
part ia the discussion In The INST place. VIII so o'
general ue quote from these blue books, but Tor
every WORD utter reHdy, If called uPoo, To re-
pest III. chapter and verse; If do not quote muen,
il because il would be unreasonable IN IN, totrrspa>s
upon tie inoulg' of tht House Ia me mex. pAce
rbesr to dis cuss the question Of iaern4tiouai law,
not that think il ubimpUfart because bold tna, no
pO-oD IL lees defrnsbe and no prrtension less tena
bic than that may exc nee the question Of ht1rha
iivbs law from the constellation vi TIL: SUBJECT rom
the frivolous IL ason that the Am. rcans have mdn-
cpal law But rs the case clear upon the municipei
law am 7, aoy 10 coDne myself to that IN tue pra'e
teal view OF the which have prescribed 10 my
s.R l am sorry to say that the prop 'lbons tnae
h.ve to support embodying my conscientious con-
yitops are nnfytur a.ly proportions which attach
very strong blame the conduct of the Government
Sir shall bot attempt to qualf, those opinions oy any
of regret. These things are of little Value
;,t 81. hotter tpr n aDpEk
OUT what b. hs 10 say and Ia tru-t tn be
corrected and exposed If he tas nor spoken the truth
Ht ar hearl. What have to LAY - this: In the first
place, col &C ament Was praclced toward the Amer-
can Government; aud, ia the second piece, not oniy
was coucea 1T practiced but the American Govern
mrut were deiuded and m-ed 10y rprr-entan"ls,
which DO not say Were intended TO n Siead, but were
evidently such that they must msiead properly con,
soerea Hear, hoarl. say this-thai the manl5ipsi
law was not orly broken but il broken IN defiance
OF the advice of those who chosen - counseor-
il was Knowingly bTOkenon the pGr ol he agents oithe
British Goven melt Hear, hear. do not say that
in these papers l. be found the proof that this was
done upoer the direction OF the Btirn Government. Bu;
with respect TO Mr. Crsmp,on my prJgJ,sl0a l. tdl.
that thee not one hairs b.adh Oh distinction De-
tween the poeon of Mr. Cra pton and the position oi
her Majesty Government Hear, heai think, as
tar ~ can Judge that the zeal of NJ Crampton and
perhaps nat hc bet eyed TO be the Intentions OF the
Government but not the instructions " the Gov
ernment, were the source of the eVis wh,ch nave
did was approved by tae Government at hone; every
claim Mr.. Champion maze was III .lntained by tue
GoyeIImeLt az home ana | entirely decline 10 draw
th, nst distinction between the original responsibility
of Mr. Crampton, as the subordinate person, and toe
subsequent responsibility t the Government
by lts unrestricted pstenor aPproval oi
Mr. Cranpton's conduct Cheersl 1t s
,sid that there is nething in the, instructions OF
the Br sh Government TO cause wrong 10 the Amer
lean Government. Nov, what Is the real tact LJrd
Carel says that anything short OF the conclusion
Of actual contract to enlist within tne limits oi the
ULi,eG Statts may be done and inhoc-nty DONE Now
that is one way Of avoioIg responsible ty because
c,ItIact - governed by the r ioc and Therefore
Contract to enlist could not be concluded at all aud he
th, goes " cay to the agents OF the 0oVefnmen
You nav persuade persons to enlist you may assist
ia. IN III 10 doing yoa may pay their passage toa
place where they can DC eLsted, although rucn an
Opinion contrary to the opleion OF the Am .rican
courts coniIsTy 10 the opinion Ot bus own law onceis
and contrary to the opinion ef Mr. Luuiey himse the
spent OF the BTiti-h Govern ment. We'll, bat Gays tue
hn N, mber Ur Norh lar Ticks hire, The aeIican
Government has acct pied the Apologies whlch nave
be- IN made. Now, Su, | Cannot admit that such
is the ease, although / not geek to detract from
the force Of what they have done \ most extra
otoluaIy state of things has been brought about
Her b.arl The Amen ican Gov. rDmeLt acGdits she
britsa Government, but at the same time pdnishes
Mr. Ciamp ON AID the three Co, sus willie the British
Goy.n hit ut maintains and acquesces In the acts OF
it, agents, and Yet accepts With satisfaction ts own
acaLital (Cbetrsl This is simple uacorned state
il contains 10 hgttcnlDy eplhheC5, bnu noceu,
do not ,hiLk that any epthet could highteR 1t
Hear h.ai Mr. Gran p'on has been % see sc8pe-
goat by whom is questna which Dwili not discuss
but want 10 kJOw whether It would not oe con-
trar, to the character aud practc. of THE House when
III. re is no sp2le aCn Of MI. Champion which has
not met with the approval Of the Government, to
allow any distincto to be drawn between the pro-
ce.oirgs OF Dir. CfaUpton and those of tle Brush
Government Loud cries of IIear"I. | admit fully
the hupors be coI0uct in this respect VI those who t
upon the Treasury bench becau.e they do not attempt
to draw any dstinc. ION. The dismissal OF Mr.
Crsnpton was either ngh. OF wrong. w, the hon
orabe anc learned Member for Leomnster says that 1t
Is the undoub,ed right Of any STATE TO ak for the
Withdrawal Of any Minister s,cred ted TO 1t at s own
plea ure and without assigning any reason. Now,
am hot, ike the honorable ard learned gen.
t,man, qualified professionally to deal with that
subject but, from referring to authorities up
IN the subject, l am Inclined to think that
some reason sboud be assigned, and in the present
ustsnce tie American Government have admitted
that principle, because they have assigned reason.
But sir hat an extraordinary course Is that adopted
BY the bon. ard learned gentleman The hsa. and
learned gentleman says that the American Government
had perfect right ~ dvnana the dismissal OF Mr..
Champion, and he gives that as reason for supporting
the conduct of Ministry which, when the demand
was made, refused to comply with 1t Hear, hear
That SIR appears to consids rab anomaly Hear,
hesrl Tt American Government had either received
Just cause fo oense not. Ii il had not then II h.d
DO right 10 make the demand fer the recall Of Mr.
Cranp on ano the dismissal OF that gentleman ought
not to heve been accepted it bae been Hear, heAr
And whatever happens, the Government ought not 10
allow matters 10 remain in their present dou otfu and
Anomalous state; for to slow Mr. Dallas TO remain
here, and at the same time, by not replacing
Mr.. Champion, TO exhibit certain amount OF i'll.
ieelirg ,oile American Government, Goes not rebound
10 the credit honor OF the country. If We send
substiute fr Mr. CHAMPION, it Is going for toward
admitting that the Americans have received Just
Of ofitb.e, and that trey have can any 10 this
House doubt The question is one which the Amer.
cal Govenmen mt haO perfect zig to rase. II might