Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-01
CAsEs Ar IANuARY rER,I. ia

GASES AT JAN
1sg Week.
/ Den lessee vs.. Malloy;
2 Seay VS.. Cameron;
3 Morrow ys. Napier;
4 Standeld VS.. same;
5 Pointer VS.. same;
6 Flowers vs.. same:
I kirkman vs.. game;
S Travis VS.. Wallace;
9 Lawrence vs.. Nashville 1
II llsboro' Turnpike Co;
10 Shelby vs.. Martin;
ii Same vs.. WetmOre;
12 Winston vs.. Field;
Is Walker VS.. Bates;
II Mayor and Aldermen Q
Nashville eNparte;
Is Young vs.. Corbett;
10 Doe lessee ys. Ray;
II GJRdey use &c. W. Mar
shall:
IS same vs.. same;
10 Baldwin VS.. Elliott;
~ Mosley vs.. Gillian;
2i Brinkley VS. McDole;
% York 4 Co W. Mckenzie
% Bic Ampbell vs. Ben;
"a same VS.. Bel 4 RoDar1s.
q Doe lessee vs. McEwen;
25 Jasper ct al ". BarLs;
% LaWhoTn vs.. Davis;
% Sloan vs.. Haskell;
29 McGavock vs.. Gilman
81 McIayOck & Co vs.. sam,
81 Jones vs.. Mitchell,
81 Mayor and Aldermen [
Nashville exp2rte;
SO State Of Tennessee US
&c VS.. Smell et a.;
S4 McCampben VS.. ClemOns
80 Jackson's Ex'rs VS.. Gil
bert 4 Son;
SO Charlotte Turnpike Gov
Spence;
81 Cross vs.. Green ct al;
80 Evans & Smith VS.. SILVER
ct al;
SO Forehand &c vs.. Farrell,
40 Chilcutt vs.. Mcintyre;
Al Martin vs.. Armstrong;
AZ Crunk vs.. James;
3 Charlotte Turnpike Co VS.
Spence;
- Fay vs.. Sloan;
40 Ayres d Matthews vs. Gil
bert;
IS Hyde vs.. Maddox;
~ Davis VS.. Moseley;
IS Charlotte Turnpike Co.
VS.. Spence;
30 Hughes vs. Gilbert;
81 Alien vs.. GOOITich;
81 Frazier vs. steamboat To
ledo and owners;
- Goldberg vs.. Hinton;
50 Harris VS.. Smiley eX'r;
81 Bank of Tennessee vs.
Greene et al,
55 Mckee admir- VI. Noel,
&c same VS.. Fame;
y Dank Of Tennessee VS.
Nrwsom;
IS Nc6avccb We. Paul ei al
So same vs.. rdcser ct az;
2d NS eek.
60 Wilson ex'rz ys. Goo VIII
e. al;
81 johnson vs. RatcliTc;
90 same vs.. 0rtOn Of az;
t3 Manufacturing Compan,
V. HOBBS : Renly;
6 Lowry vs.. Dabbs;
g. Adelphi Theatre Co rs
Greene;
&C Harrison & Richardson vs.
Boiling Il Stratton;
CT De La Nergne v, Dodge
G5 Martin vs.. En5ley;
% Williams & IIitcl;ngs "
Glover a Boyd;
~ Bell w.. Davis;
Il L & \ Railroad Go Us
\. q. Love;
72 same vs.. Walker;
70 same vs.. Gee;
"a same vs.. Mayuor;
IS same W Sledge;
10 Martin vs.. Fusse.l et al;
- MeEVen, use &c vs. Alor
ton ct al;
Is Watkins vs.. Barns;
- Nance vs.. Moore ct al;
So Pa quett vs. Austin;
81 Snegog VS.. Roberts, ad'r
So Sloan cX'rx vs.. Halle;
S3 Carmichael vs.. King ct al
81 Hsi! y VS.. Wetmore;
IS wilkinson, ct q vs.. Clin
ard;
Sc Eatherly VS.. Finson;
81 Morse 4 Son vs.. Hess:
55 Nash q Char. Turnpik.
IS. Spence;
50 Bell trustee VS. Nc DOnai,
81 Bell trustee vs.. SImuels
81 State OF Tenn, use, &C.
vs. Dodd;
% Dosson admir- &C vs. Dabb
80 Smiley -. Demoss ad'mf
rs Childress vs.. Jackson;
95 Greer vs.. Jordan.
SO Hammer vs.. Carroll, ag't;
~ Amgut vs.. Taylor;
IS UrIahay rs. Lawrence;
50 Cunningham vs. MCombt
d Cornelius
lAO Mclaughlin vs.. Kirnhro;
lol French vs.. duncan, Nor
gan & Co;
lu2 Lowe admir- vs.. Sloan;
ll3 Tal jor ys. S Boat Beauty
CT al,
~ Gilman vs.. KimbFo;
l05 MAtthrwsOn VS. Philips;
jr6 Kimbr0 vs.. Watson;
lOT steel vs.. / a RR Co;
los Buchanan vs.. Joseph;
iO9 Nancy trustee vs. ngiey
10 Demoss admir- vs.. Russ d
ct al;
III Scales vs.. Tenn. and Ala
Railroad Co;
li2 Looney vs.. Grizzard;
ll3 Burger vs.. Brien;
~ Austin vs.. Ha,s;
| 3 Bland vs.. B0ling;
Il6 Boyd ". " oodRar ] et al
III Be Of Tenn vs.. McNaiTl
et ~.
liS Bells ex'r vs.. Blk OF Tcnr
llg baak of Tennessee vs.
Mclaughlin,
100 Jackson vs.. bell;
l2l Anthony, jr., " Jackson
l22 Beech VS.. Pointer use &C
vs.. Bell;
1913 Baker vs.. jackson.
Ia Bowen ct al vs. steven
son Il al;
rs Brunson ct IL vs.. Hick
man ct al
1875 Bank, Planters vs.. Had
son;
lSi Bolton et o. Ya. Kim BRO,
Us Berry, use sc. vs.. Foster
admir-
l99 Garter vs.. Hamilton et al
$50 ChildrSss vs.Johnsoa eta
ii Same vs.. DCcs Jones et al
1872 saIne Va. Jackson et al;
lsS Sane vs. Owen et si;
l34 Collins ys. Gregory,
lS5 Coussens vs.. Mounts;
lS6 Cartwright ys. sncn et Al
l3I Chavous vs.. Die2inson et
al.
IaS Douglass ". Turnpike %
l89 Dickey IS. Manufacturing
Company;
l40 Demoss vs.. Bell;
l4i Fanaing ". Barllelt;
i42 FIRING vs.. Zimmerman et
al;
I ~ Paris vs.. Hundley;
li4 Foster, uuslee ". Nc
NARY;
l45 Goodwin vs. Paul e. al
I46 6rrfnieid 4 Co ts Man.
ufsctaFing Company:
~ G.eayss q al W. Jackson
q al;
IlS Gray vs.. iIolL, agent;
I39 Clover vs. Telegraph Co,
Sd Week.
iSe Childress " Mayor & Al
drrmvn % Nashville;
81 Driyer ". iiitehinRs;
.52 Han, vs. ~ a L Powers;
deeii--oEV4w
Valentines
P II IL Up =
nTanuF.rsw wsEr