The Cadiz Democratic sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1854-1864, 1856-12-03

e.. - -. -, ,,,,,o-i,,n;tv 20 corna or
:, a. g., L. - tho
:, -, -. 90. - ,rh., vou owe
Ill !, -
''.. ..-.,-.....~-. = =.
y The Presidential Vote OF Ohio
cyws copv in another column, from the Ohio
s,.Ss ,LoayYal Of last evening, (savs the States
-" p.,..1 w.. p,,s;Jo,,t -,
osate gwen oF Siueh' anu ''' ''''Nei''' ''
ti'e 4th Oh NoVeinDOi' i0'O'
snrpassinq the expectations Of any one:
t;ra,non, lS7. .497
buchanan, lT0S74
Se,,tsrino 1856
o -
Whole vote, ooo,oo-
e. This vote will sunrise oyery one. and is near
''S ,F..:- ~, ..a..o,.,to th.r
ooo5 oalo,,,o,ors supnoscd and some hem
). ,t.s,,n5 more than the most sanguine ant;ci-
nataa
7. not ,,v wonder that the Democrats felt,
s,,rro,,ndoa os tbev we're bv over 10000 voting
e.;ands that tbcv would carry the State, and vet
n, et,..,qor FREuoyr is, according to the table
nnLGel n IN the .Jcs,rao5 1928 greater than
hat cosk for Mr. BrcuASAN.
Tho votes Of 1876 and 1855 contrasted, stand
.,,,s.
presidential vcte 1856, 1856. .652
Vote for Governor, 1855, 302,065
-
~ increase IN one year 80,
soSe ot ~ iusi''ii't OSi, ieEE ~ A' 131 O1o
4 ;o ole ior Aea'i III 1902 ~
Tncreosed Democratic vote. 1885
.1 rose c sol tri = toi'sOi.' y: ~ 10 14e7 10
WV iVA o'i'"'' "
a Increased Fusion vote, P'''z'
vote N, cor Tl, TlillIpre N CO., oIo7G
?s O'1 - '''0 -
= Increase, 3,8to
Thcte figures speak for themselves, and hence
It treouires no argument to prove the difference
seit in the two elections, one year apart
Beaten it is true we are but no Democrat can
Took at the above l7o,874 votes, but he must not
only feel proud of the past, when he calls to mind
the odds we had to contend against and the Pc
,edliar character of the appeals made to deceive
aand win from us our voters, but he must revive
his hopes for the future, and strengthen his con-
aaence that our next trial may result in COM
.pIete redemption OF Ohio from Abolition rule.
'f' Our victors are in . minority, and one from
which they cannot redeem themselves The
votes they did not got are dead against them and
thew stand thus:
Buchanan, lip,Sf4
Fillmore, ~o' A-'
vuhu,, o,ho- 1913 q9q
Fror,ont 1877, ,497
FremonfS minority Al'o-
IL VIII be seen tha' thsre Is -"y"u9 Vi
s6u2 vets IN the state opposed 70 'hc DlacN Nc
publican, Fremont Aoeltion' h"nsa" 'o'lileAiis
Party
Whatever course me 20 10 Fillmore n'si
may hereafter pursue 1t Is very cei'&lll 'heJ Gan
never UNITE win the present blacN hepuoiie"A
organization.
Ono word IN reference 10 TINS taoie OF lo'o-S
majority ior Fremont we ali'''' "la' "ii'i
compared with their boasts ana expectations 0
rom FIFTY TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND hA'o'i'
TY, is mere nothing IN Fo'o o' nearly iou'
hundred thonsahd' o'' IN o''e uo'o'e'e' - ''i'
e'atorS OF the o''0 ''fafe o0'""" ana ''i0 '''0''
officers that We suppose FURNISHED 1t 10 ''eLh VIZ
must put our donhVS' II not t"'''''e co"SiS'iohS
that there is an error somewhere III 'he eS''ha'e
mere eouio nov w. II Soe'h' " "' 'ii' 0'''''
ties and the official returns sent up here. Ii so
it is surprising 10 US.
.,, We understood that there were some of th,
y-raa,,;.,s ,1,a. r,t,,ra,l ,,,oro, 60 many ,ce.
o~ As'i'p" 'i'' 'e,'' e'' ''''''' ~ H' -.