The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1856-08-17
SuErs nae Caurt-->peesal Term.


Arc. IL - ssiqe for ~ Seai,i Dts,r;c,.-Mr.
Iucicn Pireseye uas sworn Ia Jnage OF the supreme
Court Of tho secno District in the place OF Justice Rock
well, ceceasct
IN TIE mo,sey o5 he PAX Sauk and IA Bard Of 81
fcrTsors-An Junction Was iued IN this restrain
ing oefendar t. from Issuing warrant ~ the Receiver
Of faxes 10 collect see 0,1 the capital stock Of the
rark Rank. SIR SHEPARD coGns tor the Corporation ap-
peared 20 show cause 70 dissolve the injunction. Mr..
Ralph Lockwood opposed. and the Court reserved It's
decision.
Beror. Hoo. Judge whiting
IN Hc mcisT ~ NJ Fust N,fhdi1 Episcopal Church
Bsncn lic,d ond ethes Application 10 notify njunc
eencd. The Court ha no power 10 review the de-
cision OF smother Judge special motion
cate an Injunction ordered once denied canno, be
moved unless leave DO vel ground FOR
yacating arise (lio'men vs. Livingston John Cli:
n 2ii) Tho decision of one &c The Justices of this
court made Of sp cal -ctm cannot DO reviewed by
other Justice sitting NJ Special Term. motion 70 dis
foyc the Injunction Ia b. tase wa on pleadugs and
afldays heard sna d, MED nj Special Term. No leave
was reserved 10 renew the motion. The only facty
presented 10 me, relate 70 the cnDduc. Of the plaintiffs
and Their agents IN epdcavorrg TO Keep possession Of
the church eoce. sine. tie granting OF the injunction.
They do not touch the m"rts Of the controversy. The
- tee who heard The uoon will m0st probably Tor the
Icasons urged boiof. tho argument, order
hearing. or grant der permitting the parties 10
rev 'r mooh p'n ns Iapc,s aea 1n 'ns former
touching either The merits the subsequent condrct Of
the plaintiffs, the ,icnean's by their delay have lost
their eht OF appeal om TIC order DENYING the motion.
canno, mako any such order The motion 10 modify
tie iIjuncten must be denied without costs.
IN The Ma Ter n the Cspsroi I'ari-We@T ogs Bennett
4 di-The p'aiItn owner 10 fec of lot No ~ on
block No. ia the map the Commissioners for open.
ing the Central Park The defendants owned Its No IS
and 10 on the same block The lots Nos - aud 10
appraised s5OC each and the buildings the rcoa at $50
The lot No ~ valued At $50. and the buildings
thereon SEQ All lots were taken for the Cen
trail lark. Tie commissioners in their first report,
awarded compensation to the amount OF - OILS 20 the
etste Of Nancy Moore Intermediate 10 this report and
ts pressnimeut FOR confirmation plaintiff presented his
evidence Of title 10 LOT No a. uppn which tho commits
sIcners altered their a~srd. but did correct
the buildings thereon ~hish we're appraised at s2.y5.
To this bis hill o. complaint Is nlcd Clear
ly this is error OF fact and 80 may be corrected In
this form Of action Plaintiff entitled 10 81 obs OF this
award, ard a decree was entered herein accordingly.
The being that Of the Court defendants are not
IN default and so cannot be charged with costs The
decree must be that the Mayor Aldermen and common
atty q the city Of New YORK pay TO the plaintiff out OF
the awarded the estate OF Nancy Moore for lots
Nos. IS and TO- the block No 5s4 the map OF the
commisso ners FOR lands taken for the Central Park the
sum % s25t for the buildings lot No a. enormously
awarded 10 said estate, he being the person entitled
thereto first asceriaining whether there any liens
thereon BY way Of mortgage otherwise and deducting
thereiom any such liens and and that the
defendants be perpctusy restrained from collecting
attempting 10 collect the same either from the said
Corporation or the plaintiff Each party pay their own
tosts