New-York daily tribune., 1856-03-19

tnow he etfueer of The house No e vssk street hero
wss hocse Of PROSTITUTION Of Mercer si Iis-sro7
10 % Ncoser sfce hsve heaid that 30 6s Woos;-r sS
Wes house Cf aEnnons hsd house had snfioJei Cs1.
Cro.' rr1r7Sed-In Jsusry saw c..hu .s.; p,ii hn
taea to ne every esy VIA Lee Ssi .sr ss took + down
'td retd % him - Sc 4 was nj think pait HIM
d hin ito lat in h1r Dr. Cox gay. ns ,- money 70 pay
tin have received iTcm pI Con he money P.a Cara,r
money F-oe ved, lave know CaThai or L yeaHi ai7
snoSn hfn TO II tie Painting AID bahdHg business hiv'
kr9wr I'm to e IN ecuis;ion thoasL hin prOPer min
O. Did you ever tear that Csrhsr ruu awsy With another
woman soon sier marrying lis second We-A never ieai
q Do yo inov WIS, vampire" ISL have Iwsys un
derood that vampire person who hanging about the VI
cIy OF b. dboue to catch people coming ou; another 20 s'
tie dOor srd II qorei a. Williams sscd the lazy IF tbs
Direct EIAulins,ioE.-Q~ Was Mr. CsrhAr vampire -
O. You had every CONF ence IN him o. psrsoa Of integrity
joseph T. Sweet svor.I reside at No Isl fory ,eeOna
street, 90 lot know defendant. know where Mfs Wood
O. Have you seen woman at Mrs Woodwork resembling
defIdAni (Obecte 70 b. Mr. Gerard Objection ssiaine
GEORGE Merritt, svorn.-Q Where do yCl r1-do' A At
No Ct West Tweesetn street in tho STesa ''.d of the
@ Are you Of the Counclsn Of that wsril 4 bad
the misfortune to be elecd last EO one Of tie COuacD
u.en Of the Chy Of New.YOLk lLirfh'erl
Q. Do you fnow the defendant Mrs Cox A think
SS'5 How .Hf 'lBSl tbnt IL The nesbboooi of
u when did yo9 h-, SeeGIne scq a ~ & UT az , "a
Br Gerard GDtsrrlpt.ns vitne lwbsi that it IS In
tended to he roved by this witnesS'
Dir SeLs1e said they desired the yario1S names oe
fendsD. he's &C Be by since he knew tor
The said be should pefnt counsel to go behind the
Nh toushton thought perfectly competent 70 slow
certain tie conduct Of tas woman
The Couri tLousht the evidence va. inc onre.eat
Mr. Gerard laid be was willing tho question in relation to
nsues should be asked.
O By what DID you know her, Il As Abraham II.
q Bysn; o'ber psme' A do no, ow did; he.r,,y
1T IT, hv
q DO you know whether she Nsu Myeks wife not
A. certainty cannot tel for dout attend eveybody wed
O. bid you zee an sdyertise Of their msrlss A
Q wssit before or tfer you hal known her Mira vaa
Wyckl
NJ erard-Seyer nird; have given yol rope enough
NT scLsner-Yo don't happen to have the dipenng Of
Iore ueh you nay have somehis to 90 with It hereafter
AnIwsI1It wss before her marriage. was employed BY
Sir. Van Wyck any years.
O. Where did defendant reside that ime' A. cannot
Crossessmined-I cannot the year of their marriage
must have been eighteen or years ago. somewhere
IN tIt neahborhood; pretty good recollection first
time defendant far back 1875 met her in
hrse No 2l or eS Washington street with Mr Van Wyck;
- - "a - ,hen o., g. na ". and .ool ann,
pr with them defendant sShed her esen to tbs truth OF
this statement to her lady friends ny Van W{ck was Yey
eod mine have clred trunks and baggage for de-
fendant many times about the city could eaurerae the
places II you wsh.
Witness-I can talk if it's wanted lLausberl
@ What Mr.. vsp Wyek's business A He was mer-
srntr that he died about 1919 lS5oi think be died in
MT Schsner 10 Mr. Byrne)-wir you furnish with the
certificate o usrage Of defendant to Mr. Van Wyck'
Mr. ByneI have been endeeTorng TO mud ali the aiter'
O CWtnessl- you know whether not defendant dur
ing the tue ae9ue1,ed With her, lived or eohabted
Objected to and the objection sustine
The Court adjourned to wednesday