The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-26
In Equity. No. II5I.

Robert AGAINST James Eddge, Henry Laurence Charles
wlam Virgins 'ohn Bowie Cray and the heirs
In the bl originally 6led ,hs cause John oray wa. com
panant but aerwad BY leave Of the court
substance Cf e original amended, supplemental
on Or September si2 grant was made by the
governor of Caonna 20 Justo Laro situate
s%on The Caianeio BY Which grant az aSsa
lutte %"d oea n % ssa passed Win definite
advised hat no legislative proceed
e lheby passing sold said rancho 10
@ 3 and duly ieeorded SAID Grove COOK
Of and Rebecea wife, BY dated on he 81
vsy Taylor, dsendau john Bowie Cray,
oI and Two hs Gray h mars neuns ,he oas hsn
BY one Forbes and oot including worked BY
AID ores ihen known which ouad
las, together gL way water
grazing for a cattle horses and mules belonging said and
establishing SMELLING works. Lniloiug
%lnes; together estate sh ,e inieest proper
", aud demand Of said Cook and wife
accidentally The supplied
cud and duly Of March, sas au which,
mke explained in The bin eroneoa.y stated body Of The
complainant and the defendant Gray surviving
aIss Mah 1885, saa of.he and .ats
York an. Ena his % %s me said Cray I, M stafford county H.
complainant, - ashngton in the Dsac! Of Columbia
This declaration OF trust states that of lands
s ads m sad .s an@ ID e Sens "a%e a
sd Tas aad Gray Il ee,s te foregoing Of which
Gay other this It
s Ss ra a s M q ,s s a. % sn
ores, aud other things sad purchases then
Of Taylor Gray
and 3 wa s p Ta said
have declaration Of his portion therein.
respective conveyed the the said Taylor and
veyed said Taylor and Cray; The be held by complain
n shs PURPOSES and no ahe SET o in said aeearaon Of trust
ns parties % % I e It, e aa
a and other things described in the several convey
resled q four hun Iea shares
Sta o s. ~ Gray iso By Robert r ssson
B. Macy 10 BY Levin 90 and by Tay
pp' he said e..p,e mines
ss he s.oe business Of the PARTIES was 10 BY
truees majority them their successors Sc and they were
business at 70 DC fixed b hemsves The relative
said property changed of them
having sold oa, 9 s who now W. owns large PARTON
and the du of carrying objects of the has devov
sHa.s from Grove G. Cook and vile made person BY
Cray aud BY lams Iaor agent Of Knowles ay
the eompainan nor he feels Ge certain John D. Cray OF
any person Cook
from ao In Apd Or May sls aei said purchase and
Grne5d rayo who was ssen, a Knowles Taylor and also 9"
said anra frequent inquiries said James
Btanerd Taylor Cook denied tn lere was truth n The ru
Virgins sad rancho While the
aiion before mentioned for The OF second
he frsf was in pr"ges said Wsg. eognizai
a M M S, 70 1e s1y Tsa sa% a he
in e rancho with Cook and na he looked COOK aon
ing long Of James Baned
Taylor wtn both Cook aud Wgsas they repeatedly au1sa IS no % ~
from Taylor Gray, James brained Taylor conn
ding ther Representations permitted Wssns 10 i've on Tue prop
Wssns Afer The departure Of ane ,ranerd Taylor, or msen
poanss BY swng him habits Of dissipation ~ be be
s ~ wn,sn slT Ts nnS arno 70 ~ ne s Of lung $50
ns together Of whom was James ~
Jones' parties hed 1lI o. eompiant - ss daet ceai, o.
a,a alleging Wssas aud Coos had together purchased sa
aneho om Laos Ia oe proportions Of o aoa sha
e The deed 10 Cook alone thai was agree
Taua- in rust Wjsgns that the Sd Of
Apn sis Cook made the sale to Taylor and Gray sesnoeo
n seventh Of The properly sgd virgins owned ths dssoa
The deed om rooI 70 item was po that
uf,. purchase Of Cook and Virgins iron Lao W,ssn
sosan Of t. wh hs knowlsdso Of T,lo and ctayi INA,
ono UNDIVIDED eighth nnarals, and other things de
sbrd the deed Cook Tsy.f and Cray Ihs psaons 10
rayor and Cray be eompeled to re
n full responsive 70 H. and generally and special,
sa1s a. as, ~ @ an a@" Snr fa' u o ns ia
John B. Gray an Hnswer to the aver
mentioned 1nen'i on he aS ssc asTse%ss
w uansf this 70 the district court Of the United
by Gray his and by order Of me sa eou .ao
spsed Amer various proceedings IN The Unteo
STA dis,riet rour district Of oaiirn which
court, on the ll November 1854 made the
following decrets
Uattsd states Disriet courJOr s Northern Det Of California
" Two. M Gay, Final Decree.
Tn coming be heard the stipulation Of Pane;
appended and after hearing argument o. OF %
euh In ,r duly verified by oa ard no
compliments, be Deemed ana
forth IN said ansW
defendants and iheH assigns and oe ana m
hereby cer6ed and confirmed a against be SAID c
psinan And ordered, adndgd, and deereed lha,
OF the said property 70 he
and wife John Gay and KNOWLES ryiaf.
for In .ad an hereby confirmed forever
asin-t spd that me properly,
he passed D, them Zee FROM al unsi !" "oaim w po' "
M be further ordered audged decreed that by he con
by Gray a. his wife, and the ad knoss
Taylor Eliza WITT. and te said Robet. Whker Nooc
syi grantees Of the several rights set
declaration Of free from any and Az claims %
whatsoever the safe eompanan o. ~
perfect valid ubssting ie 20 the sad
property described therein. against said comp'ainans
veyance said from Grove Couk 70 Jose
Asero and hl. associates comprising the santa Clara Msss
Company bearing January, 1915, be, and the san
hereby confirmed against the said compiainan free rom Az
cas the said ,ompainants, either OF heH oy wSy o uus'
And fursr ordeed adudgd deceea that the lease se
srh in ssid from Grove " Cook 70 Jose Aefggo na % ~
associates bearing The 2ih day Of Januay ls be ana e
hereby confirmed free from all claims Of the said com
p's,nants, ny way OF trust or otherwise -, -, a., osv
Sc, foh John chsis and from said
Alrsgo and his associates by The Sud Jonn ~ ss Az
Of December sis and the hereby conhmea against
compaants om all claim O. the said esmpanan
or her them, by Of uus, or otherwise. --
ord-d, ndudged, and deceed that me convey