The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1856-03-05

act that it is stated that in 1859 hundred and rty
persons have been in crOed there hsviug been
baptized and that in 1857 there mentioned ninety
three marriages. plumber OF little importance In refer
epce the population Of the State Of Pennsylya
na but considerable in relation to that of 1857. Ws
in the registers do not find any mention OF hs mar
risge Of w. Moore and Sarah Lloyd you see there only
marriage Of W. Moore and Rachel Right undsr date Of
This Is dos o. ss
prove bis marriage with Sarah Lloyd aud it il i'm
possb not TO conclude from the silence Of the registers
that this MARI did not In 1857 II attem pied
ssoord to those registers even 70 Ii. father Of family,
nass,r.ey. since you offer proof j.. isniiy b.
BILE exhibit to the original The original has been.
writing to bis daugh in september 1854 not sent her
this pretended tef Instead Of this they devoted them
selves in oco'er and November 1854 TO researches aud
the insufciency Of ali these MEANS the 26h January
1885, that Mr.. Willing concluded to have copied BY
claimed to have been in his possession since 1856
Not only BY the legislation Of France, bat even
to refuse this document. Numerous decisions
of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania prove that
In fact adsers.res are 10 posssson Of the originals
correspondent of NJ De vaimy writes to him that he
tephia, that tine bible In question hiss been sent to
France.
On the other hand even in atributuR TO this Bible the
greatest authority this fact ought lead to the con-
cluki0n thst the which ii contains should bo
tor The purpose Of the these mentions
be caval with the facts they state; In this Bible
have Teen MADE onrtu without interruption and at
the marriage Of 1851 ana the births Of the chill
the apy mp tol7Ss interval 81 years. Moreover
you 90 bd there stated the principal events
s sas marsse a M ,1so 'hs soes. son o. w.
ter Eliza in 17s6; the marriage Of Madame BArbe do
na,oois, IN i,ss iDaeeG tne exnioue, inscriptions
for the cause the Bible in question 10 therefore
unIsit nu d. e.. evea. !. ~ INC 2mpee.
nacsme RBgwsy and endeavors t0 establish that they
stonca y rd hare aa n; S;s, ~ sao nss. IN
the Of Mr. Rsrhs de- Msabo "ud msia 20
t,efx and MT nv ogolnts Won 5sstrnu 80 a.
areumeutr With ave- rretenaeS to resniy from 'n0
again xnoseS the .cts If the c.%sa tst W.,
rior to The death OF Madame de- pia;ssnos the nnks
Rio IN whose Souss ha had aavoraI +ms.
diped and with whom he had ume IN the Tbaa,rs
is and that under these cirsunstsn noes,
Rjdovsv had bsen Recognised Hs msinta;ns rmrthar
that i9t b. ssid to the oontrarv Massrs do
VaImy and de- i.ry we're in too mncn hays, ss tho H
death of The Tnchsss So pls,aca tn o,sss;o ~
her inher;isncs - AaAoo' " '"A0 Po'''s''on v
What o,d theT do with this nhert.nse9 This "a a
rvstar, d,eorit - ,anatrata Tho III, .;n ~
hsrs Wno ars sbs to !. tSst nv
vainss ~ 1h IN, a,;,sncs the vers Sdd % .ue
sha1es NJ ,hs panr NJ Eranca NJ about loo no0 ~
,hs sr =, - IN hn &c u ~ a0oas IL ~S'
.nms ~ ,hsm - ana he .na.ereS tht th
.S vi n aaa a n mr. .nss tng g.sa'Ss psl1
NJ p,sa,sa - -an a;nad 40, -. Sa. =. 49,
MIS- w. neh ansa cay Is soc was convinced that
ns puchtss de palsapce had ieit w, has been said
nT;se her ~ ,ha I..,n Of Nine az pI.;an.a aS d.tp
her from raising the least eiicutv n th,s ssns.t Thi
10 on errcr tor 5ba latter v,sts. m J"IS @
tsins the folio massage The death os the nnche..
de- Piaissncs Who died without leaving vim rsndr. q
~ tortSrs os - an;,Srsn 10 tha a.t 49, !,
fore he cid not make snv aluson Of the sind ~
wa1 nro f. xers ksd for Was this lsrsS v.s honas
De Vslmv and De Irv had In thsr rhs
%ny papers ta, tns ste gTts o. mrs
thew reane less thoss uroo shond ha nro
duced It Is necessary to comply with that exciting de-
,ea,iopa which connected her wi + Messrs Ds Valmv
ans De Iesv nm scs # notorie wouS i. svfacsnty
Therefore Se nroauced an act sstshih,a~ mar !. mv
t;,iss drswn M cn M oath md soth 81 nt ,ha 10sy
hets NJ Imrant notary at paris II vomd seam II.
y; u. - snch % , a., rs;,ncs "m,s s01m o,is
S,ah 90 M .ha csc Tha a.h;S;t;I ~ HaSa. Sa
mo in An erica WIS we have oh aimed them and
This has not heen fesmed The nroof tha, NJ
Tbn,.s Noora 20. r"aiiv 40 hro,har - H.Sass ~:
de- MSrbois he, been re1nirsd tn. nroof Of the mar
Iisre of Wiam Moore and sarah III I'd and that Of the
red NJ ns rh "a Marh;. have ssn hesn soeI n" Th
have beer looh ed for has net BEEN
rs .. Hicent by the TibInaI De PremiSre Lnne have
teen found.
a. tt t lew i J, n n. ss' aaa
ment Of the of OF the rights Of the ners Wiling This
principle beng admitted he rsfues toe objection drawn
fror fhs sx;ssnce M In In Pannsvvsn;s corcarnipc
The of for the
Of msrrisees and reads on that suoisc, certcate Of
custom dsvered oy Mr. Reed counsellor and Attorrev
General for .he countv Of Philadelph ExsoninO afar
wards lie facts upon which his c;snts nave osse1 their
sction he reads The contra, II Of mar.cs Of NJ ana
Madame Rar az de- Marbos In the face Of ueh n ,ts
M nntan,. vbo can cont;nna IN c,tartain dorhS
con.eTn;ro ths sha ~ leo;s;sta man ana
vile Of william Moore and ssran ovSy II has hsen ssd
hor tba, m. names Of Two citnesses Who ere nrs
ssn+ ., ,hs v; contract NJ msyr.os .re Mt " ~ na
N ths act a. ,stoiors alteration II th.s ser;ons oh
ectionS Is /; nos evident that this Absence ia tn ~ s
pIsped only oy religious motives and nv nothing eses
There ia ano,he whore Testimony Il of great vsi,h n il
washington himself The following r tn .en from an
American booE-The Republican court, or American So
cie,v in the time OF WashiugtOn:-
"rbe marriage of Mr. de Marbois and OF Hiss Moo-e,
saws tire wreS took place lately the ceremony Was
p.forred In n morning in the cha ,el of the mnisar
bv his cbapsin and in the evening at the hou of MI
Moore nv Mr. White the mipster Several rumors have
been upou this occasion and other,
that the yuupe lady renowned her religion to become
Catholics that RE had been bap and had Communal
.a.rd h,+ -, o,;,;nc 20 +hot noth;nr ha. naar .d