The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-04

saeOoo payable equal in,achs for which amount Wig
sS gave s note secured S osass on one Do % ~ as
Fo.ss S WSssSa slid ps..ss aSsa aud sss
sn. y ,sid rsnsl ing: fourth. as Ss.as "a
deed dated Angus; Said va: MOI
,Ssea Seloas % view Of aasns soass The
ie.s TO Be ns1pssd therein In 1850 said and o,e
aud X a so%ae s"spe Mining Company
winch aitehpt gave e TO SUIT Tor ioee euy and de'aner
%sss. @ and asass syo1 s and Gray
and osr m formed eo%psny for working sd
said Guadalupe Mining Company and particularly
saSwss % Ss S
ssss nc sss e 4; shSs
Eos Roe ~ % one % G s q lbs ss % a"d ~
"raS wa. also e@oysS by s@ I" sa s ssaoa ;, TIC
u1'sd State. board 81 land 10 California Of lhs
auense and Ia order TO avoid possible M and do
missioner. said Rose Ssssd wnI sid
aIos elaim V be sea,c hs gqaa Of nm
form Of The Continuation SHOULD attic. the rgo of either party
And sa Rose e, Of S s S|s az e,as
made the board to Fossat The defendants
lated e said asee%su and s, ho said
vested absolute e IN sad Po'sa s1a assigns They have
dcpued oibrmselss said Edrgeto sell said prop
cry In the Aans states and Il Europe and no has made and
uonsess March, 1851 10 ascertain settle private land
claim. California eo.hrnaoos BY The so"msons 10 or ;,
ns, applicant oa! Of no g,.psoI Parties deriving a"
as ne tile 4 ,ssas. ,%ps.fsss 4 DC
LaarenC and fosa, . insist on their fraudulent preensons
he
s voIatng their with said Rose concerning e
IIcvent him em using properly
s % s 9" % al H. s pin me-. %
ns ~ s e s sS s % II
informed The complainant, proceedings for the confirmation
and hs, The e had been $ but
reneel tina. !hs cam should be the name Of
such The ID ihe name Of ha,
appealed from y the United States and Is now pending on
o,ns The s charges hs. ne .eia Eddss o.,
sat, and foes judicial decision the pending b.
the ohrr fraudulent violation OF the aforesaid agreement
The I. advised that BY reason Of bis To the
the United States district Of California. Ills couustce
Ss Jnsd district oI caoIns The
'a1y steps to By injunction the issuing Of the patent
Cray sensssas. oa.,rd T. sad a,s fouad.a'
from Cook and wife to sSo and Cray The deearaton Tus
of 2ls March, $780, and the thereof
dasaps ss s Gs and
s by rns m , 81 Ss ,s treaty aud do Of s ssa e. e
Others clsm.g ane saa two deeds from Cook and wife,
% es s sSS N s 50 aas
ss9n ne board Of land % Of
lied patent himself said Gray % surviving
or least that his rights should be projected Under the
aforesaid eay the laws Of nauons and the constitution OF the
Uated by being specially excepted n patent that
issued That said be deceed be charge said
lands In tho hand OF that suh ba
deceed stand The companan DR.
him, hc thar patent shall Issue until the rights OF the
m inant properly secured under decree Of this court The
bin nune,on restraining tho defendants, Eddge
and Fossa from selling said land, from disturbing
complainant the thereof &C kc and from violating
the said with said Ross the TO be
given confirmation The also he Hon Thoma.
A. Hendricks Commissioner of the Land oce be enioned
from issuing grsnng, delivering the said Charles
Fossat Of tho confirmation made
In his favor until he defendants have answered this bi
and until the further order OF and for order of pub
caion against tho absent defendants The hill also ff
decree that said acs nom Took 10 Taylor and Uay and said dg
Nosrmbef H. 1884, valid hind said
rcnrc Iddge and fosa and preclude claim ter to
hr properly by SAID shle that the complainant snd
Gray wing Aforesaid ented The bcnei
be issued under the Aforesaid confirmation the
Of the rights rancho by conveyance from
Cook TO Taylor and Gayi end that said suenee Edhdge aud
Pssni be ordered 10 much o the rights s
said Tancho originally conveyed by Cook Ty
and Gray the should be patented the
Fossat prrvtot-ly to tho nnal decision ofthe
And appearing TO the g nt that the said Henry Laurcnce
hne, fossAt, William Virgins the James w. JONES'
Jnbn Bnwe Gray, them, rndents District
of Columbia ,ccupon this 7h day Of Junc 1885, ordered
the court that the complainant by cAurg o this order
b pabshed IN some Newspaper Published In the city Of Wash
IN said District twice week for weeks before
fourth Monday OF October notice the absent de
PENDANTS Of the object and of b
appear IN by solicitor before
c2use have, why ought pass prayed
Otherwise, the same will be taken for confessed
by order of the
Test JNO. A. SMITH, Clerk.
True copy-Tcsii mo A. SMITH, Clerk