Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-12

'ilA - ~tAN 49, Y " ~ 49, : -
J sses to summon them to at
!ird or fourth Monday of the
the eau g stands on the docket.
following causes viii stand for
he term:
JARY TERM, 1875
lihS Letcher ys Hudsea;
liS lowe VS.. sloan;
lia5 Moore vs. Hughee;
ll5s Merritt vs.. Benson Ct al:
ISL Shackietf W. Gilman;
ll5s Stewart vs.. Edmondson;
lit9 State Of Tenn use &c vs..
RUSSELL 81 al;
l1e0 TreAdway g. wife W.
I Goodwin admir-
ltai Wallace VI. AeShn:
1852 fhnsnpso on tFr vs. Tenn.
AMI Ala. Railroad 90;
il63 Williams vs.. Glover;
li64 Beatty W. ClOdfelter;
4 fIe5 Tillman vs. WlliamE
lI6-i Petxay vs.. Wilson ct al;
81 Dunn vs. Rreider.
i6S Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
o. vs.. Marlia;
li69 Shute vs. \ 4 c Railroad
Co;
20 Ewing trustee vs. same;
IN n 4 c Railroad Co Va.
@ DoneIson.
i72 Lanier & Falls vs.. Vanller
llT3 Livingston VS.. Nah Gas
Light Co;
i174 Gilman vs.. Wright:
llT5 Lanier 4 McNickle vB.
vaniier;
iIT6 Halle 4 Cows. Bridge Co.
~ Young vs.. Summerhill;
Is Corporation Of Nashville
vs. Rsyford;
ilT9 Ssms vs.. Hig Iins;
81 Same ' Raliord;
81 same vs. Same: @
llS2 Same v Hsm,i on;
I 1873 Gof vs.. Stevenson preSi-
dent. &C.
s4 Cru'chel vs.. Foster
IS ChildYeSs vs.. Manned ct al
liS6 Cantr. ] W. Sloan;
1871 Doe. lessee, VS.. Waggo-
lis brigham vs. strstton ct al;
lS9 Same vs.. Craighead;
t9J Same VS. Hays ct al;
IiY1 Bacc,ius W Porter;
.t9 Bosley VS.. Welch
93 CO.. G vs.. Mayor and Al
dermen q Nashville:
i9+ Davis vs.. Bradley;
50 Douglas vs.. Cartwright 4
Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee. VS.. Hin
ton;
9: Glover & Boyd, use &C
VS.. ollett;
i9S Goldberg 4 Go. VS.. insu-
rance Co.
80 Harris vs.. Pitts;
.2,ai Hays vs. EGmundson ct al
II H"ru and wife ys.Stewart;
2 2 Lellystt 4 Ewing vs.. Mills
4 tgan:
2n8 HolIins vs.. lyman et e.;
2 ( Haliowell 4 Co ". Hu {
BOO Hammond 4 Co. vs.. Lu-
cas- et al;
1'6 TIousley W. HaRan ct al;
OF Hoke 4 hTo. V Jackson.
2US uGmWell vs.. Tel graph
ComTA
200 Jchnsoa vs.. NooIs etal
2 o james 4 Co. ys. owen Ct
al
II Insurance Company ".
Peck q nj;
.ll2 jenkins ~. Bu h ct al;
2 8 kerhy vs.. BrocAw y;
~ LiLsry ". BTidge Co.;
9 5 Mckinney vs. Shelly;
ZIG McCamPbell, trus &c vs..
Hicks ct nj,
.2l7 Same vs.. Mar;
Is SIC ut, sh VS.. Mayor and
Aide mrn;
219 Nara vs.. lnsurs ncr Co:
% MsIloy We. Turnpike Co.
32l Vi Roberts It al Vs. JACK.
son;
222 ndhsm vs.. Pau, eX'r;
~ PeIway VS.. CTuIcheT e. al.
2 ( Pope W Washington.
4th Week.
225 Mining Company ys.
Mitchell IT al.
22G Murrell vs. Ma,Or and
Ald'mn q Nashyi le;
227 Minueit 4 WnicOOp vs..
McCombs ct VI;
22S Morgan 4 Co. VS.. Wick
house;
229 Mills Va. Stewart;
y3J Mart n vs Braiy;
20, MTreIl & MaIlOck vs.
Tenn Il Ala. K X. Co;
272 Ovens vs. Johnson;
.233 PGIte fed vs. y ATTY;
23t Stewart 4 Go. vs.. Hume;
l235 Same VS.. Bnwi'n,;
236 Sawnels. by next 'riend
vs.. Mayor 4 Aldermen Of
Ma .hvilie;
2 I ShegoPg vs.. SinmS:
2SS Wright VS. OrenshaW;
2{y z mn,rman vs. McNairy;
240 Bank OF Tennessee vs..
Ham ton ct al;
24i Camuse W. Patterson;
242 State OF Tennessee vs.
Wilkinson ct al,
2 3 Rel vs. Neirh;
2ii Guthrie and wife W.
Rains;
- Jordan vs.. Davidson;
2i6 Porter Bergen.
Z4s LIVINGSTON " Mayor and
Aldern eu a Nashville,
24s Barns vs.. t,ilman;
: 9 Rains ". Williams;
30 Thildress v. Nv en-;
,5i Corporat on Of Nashville
VS.. Hamilton;
252 8 Ele W. II ggins;
s.S Same rs fSIn:
s54 Same W. Guruand;
. 5 Btllentire W. Brown;
255 WOolf TX vs.. n. snd c.
Railroad Co;
~ Mayor 4 Ali'men Nash
vile expsTte;
s5S Mayor & Al nm o. Nash.
Vile eNpSTte,
80 Oids W MekSdden;
26O Campbell vs.. OGenshaW
et Al,
2sl Corporation vs.. Moore;
26g Morrison VI. Grab IN;
C8 Same W. same,
p Z SaIre vs.. SANE;
2ib Same rs. same;
% Same vs.. same.
s. Same v. same;
b5 Pinkffton yt. Crensi aw
ei Al;
2 Q Smith & Co. ". Same;
lTO Same Ns. ssnit.
sJl sane W. same;
~ amr ~. cam,
2T3 Childress ys. Hampton
ct al;
s54 Junes vs.. n mce;
- Ltakr W. iiarell;
2If Ftey ct al vs.. knight etai;
" Jackson W. beil;
s nodd W Henry a skinner
iTs Pope " Washington;
81 same vs. same,
81 Same W same;
iS2 Peck A ~ - " Mostfn;
lN8 Pointer " Bel;
80 Papin W VoiEot;
,s5 Pc K vs Carter et el;
'-d PaTla vs Jackson
81 Sesy, trustes W Tarpley [
Pyle;
IS Shute vs Big'ey,
10 stevens vs. Hamilton etal
10 Shu1e vs. Had ~ n al:
~ Same W Williams ,i a.;
90 Van ibyke, sdm'r ss Pearl
- AAiGrcn vs. seruggs; /
" warm th " Casey; (
9S WhitSdth vs. Ssa.uny st
a.; I
rs Weai ~ RroWn,
% warren v. Union Bsnk;
., kliurd vs Scales cx'r
~ Glcaycs Ct al Adm'r ys
Eozeli a a.;
W Same v Goodiett et al
III SAme " ksst a al;
: Wis n W G rtcr;
} 3 Mhiitman vs Carter.
,0t Latter a McNickle " !
SSlEg, Dick 4 Co;
THO. T. ssnLFY. r'-vs.
for 1886!
z % n A *,
l07 Nassau 81 N. York
TO booksellers and deai~rs 10
.ta~k of VAE.EA IN