Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-02

TT VI ~ ~ III alk1AAN u NAAG
.Ae cnu e stands on the docket.
.ollowing causes viii stand for
he term:
JARY TERM, 1875
ia5 Letcher vs. Hudson;
i54 owe vs.. Sisan;
.ih5 Moore vs.. Hughes;
ll5i Merritt VS.. Benson et al:
'l57 Shacklett ". Gilman;
ii5S Stewart vs. Edmondson;
iS9 State OF Tenn Use &C ".
fusseil q al;
100 TresdWay & wife vs.
Goodwin admir-
Il6l Wallace vs.. Acklu:
I 60 Thompson thu. vs. Tenn.
an / Ala. ka'lroad Co;
So Williams IS. Clover;
tii BeaJy IS. CiOdfeltsr;
/ 65 Tillmau IS Williams;
I Gi PetBay vs. Wilson ct al;
GT Dunn vs. KreijeT;
IS renn. and Ala. Railroad
ca. v. Marlin;
60 Shute vs. n & O kaiiroad
Co;
20 Ewing trustee vs. same;
Il n s Q Railroad Co vs..
DOnelson.
I 2 Lauier & Falls vs.. Vanlier
- Livingston We. n, h Gas
Light Co;
I "a Gilman vs.. Wright:
I5 Lanier & McNickie vs..
Vanlier;
&c Halle & Cows. Bridge Co.
! q Young VS.. Summerhill:
\ ) Cooperation Of Nashville
vs Rayford;
/ 70 Sams vs.. Higgins;
itSI same ". RaliOrd;
ST Sa & vs. Same:
IIsZ Same v Ham on;
] ls3 GoG VS.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &c
81 Cru'chei vs.. Foster
d. SIS Child ess vs.Mammel ct al
iS6 Cantr ! vs.. Sloan;
1871 Doe. lessee, VS.. Waggo-
.l>S brigham vs. tratton ct al;
tS9 Same W. Crsighead;
i9J same VS. Hays ct al;
|tsl B4ccAus " Porter;
10 BJsl-y vs.. Welch
1893 Co'e VS.. Mayor and Al.
dermen oi Nashville;
.l94 Davis vs.. Bradley,
ll95 Douglas vs.. Cartwright &
Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee, vs.. Him
ton;
o. Glover & Boyd, use &C
vs.. uilett;
i9s Goldberg 4 Go. vs.. insu-
rance Co.
99 Harris vs.. Pitts;
.20n lIays vs. EdnundsOn ct al
~ U1ru and wife vs.Stewart;
2 2 Leilyett & Ewing vs.. Mills
a kgan:
POS Hollins vs.. Ry man ct al;
PA lialiOwell Z Co, vs.. nu Z
.205 Hammond & Co. vs.. Lu-
cas- ct al;
!nG Housley W. Bagan ct al;
/ 07 Hoke & Bro. ". jackson;
.2US il.mwvll W. Telegraph
Company:
200 Jahasou vs. Noole et Il;
2 0 James i Co. ys. owen ct
al
al Insurance Company W.
Peck /, { al;
lit2 jenkins vS. Bush et al;
2 3 KeFby vs.. Brockwry;
IA Lius,y W. Bridse Co.;
.2'5 Mex nney Vi Shelly;
'2l6 McCsnpbeil, trustee vs..
Hicks et al;
iIl7 Same vs.. Mtrr;
; els MclutCsa ". MAYOR and
Aide men,
.I1i9 Nara IS. Insurance Co.;
20 Mglloy vs.. Turnpike Co.
ri McRO0rfts IL al ys. Jack
son;
222 Oldham W. Paul, ex'r;
- PrtSay vs.. Crurcher E, al.
IA Pope vs.. Washington.
1sh week.
225 Mining Company VS..
Mitchell It ~.
226 Murreil VS.. MaNOr and
Ald'mn Of Nashville;
227 Minneit x WihcoOp vs..
McCombs ct ~;
rs Morgan & Co. VS.. Tick-
F.; house;
I29 MillS ". stewart;
80 Mart n VS. Beatty;
23l Murrell 4 MatlCek vs..
Tenn & Ala r X. Co;
232 Ovens vs.. johnson;
,33 Porte, field VS.. Beatty;
23t stewart & Go. vs. Hume;
/ Z33 Fame vs.. Bowl.nt;
2sO ramuels, BY next friend
j vs.. Mayor a Aldermen Of
f; Nashville;
. 27 Shegoeg vs.. Simms;
23S Wright VS. Crenslaw;
: 80 Zmm,Tman vs.. McNairy;
; $40 bank Of Tennessee vs..
Ham ton et Al;
24l Camuse vs.. Patterson;
2l2 State Of Tennessee vs..
wilkinson ct al;
2 8 Bell vs.. WEIGH;
5 pa Guthrie and wife vs.
Rains;
"a Jordan VS.. Davidson;
3 246 p0rttr v. Bergan.
pa Livingston " Mayor and
Alderu eu a. Nashville,
I 24S Barns vs.. Gilman;
z y Rains vs.. Williams;
80 thtldress vs.. Oeen,
.5l Corporal on o. Nashville
vs. Hamilton;
252 S me vs.. II Fgins;
,: 3 same vs. FINN;
. i54 Same rs. Gurnand;
, Biilentipe We. Brown;
25J WOoLf TX W. ~ and Q.
Railroad Co;
.257 Mayor & Ald'men Nash
vile expaFte;
255 Mayor & Al nm Of Nash
vile exparte;
.g59 Olds vs. Mctaddsn,
200 Campbell vs.. Cienshaw
ct al,
2s1 Corporation vs. Moore;
26s Morrison vs.. GrahIm;
{ 90 Same vs.. same,
- fame ". same;
2d) Same vs.. same;
% Same Ys. same:
8 Same y. same;
IS pinktrton We. Crensl aw
ct Al,
2 Q Smith 1 Co. vs.. same;
2lO Same ~. same;
2Ii sane V. same;
IA amr -. sam
.273 ChildFess vs.. Hampton
Ct al;
'2T4 Jones vs. Nance;
..I1 Leak- ". iiareils
ZIG F'ey ettlys. Knight etal;
if7T Jackson ". Be !,
i2iS Dodd vs. Henry a skinner
i2Is Pope " Washington;
IS same vs. sane,
~ same vs. SANE;
I2S Peck 4 ~ s. vs. Morton;
l2S3 Pointer W Bcls
2S4 Pspin vs Noizot;
IgS5 r., < vs. Carter et el;
,>G Paris vs. Jackson
Isl Sesy, trustee " Tarpiey
a Pyle;
l2ss shute vs. Bigiey,
'2>9 stevens vs. Hamilton et al
$50 shGte vs. ilad'ey II al.
zsl Same " Williams ct al;
.292 Van Dyke, aln'rss PeAil
SO WaIdron " Scruggs;
z9t Wurmoth W Casey;
IS WhitwoFth vs. SeAiany et
al;
90 West " Brown;
% Warren v Union Bsnk;
s9s Aif0ri W Scah.s eN'r;
80 6leaves e. ni admir- vs
Eo1sn It ~;
300 Same v Goodiett e Al;
Bel Same W Hast a Al;
5 2 Wis n ~ Carter;
3t3 bhieman - Carter;
S0s Lauier a McNlckie vs.
Ewing. Dick A O..