New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1856-12-27
Law INTELLIGENCE.
COURT or GENERAL sEssroNs-Dnc s-BeSor- aass
CkrsoS.
TRIAL OF CHARLES B. HUNTINGTON FOR
ALLEGED FORGERIES.

ALLEGED F0RGERIES.
TrxrH pAr.
The Court resumed il. session at haf-past ten
O'Clock yesterday morning.
William Winnie svora- Am one Of the drm Of Ira
ny. u % s ne:
The note s<a % Be forged on srn that nats
s.iy c.. eSnni.!Sa n.es.u 81 Ie nos. u $3.50 s.H:
banded 70 ths vitns.s The Signature this note bsars
re.en .nes . the sn.sr Of cur firm In the as az or The
Geo G. Lshe eIsmtped-t am Of the 6ru Of Ubsdsll.
Lax. issv.r.l .hs-nj None Of those as,,ar,s AZ,
genuine Do hey bear resemblance 10 the signatures Of
=. june Aasa. md s.ps.~s. Ass The t as@. q i.
srn no; ub.del,, Peir,on Lake;
Cross exanined-We Tad last Summer.
II. r.. Z. sS,s Nj SS, .i ,d%S @ U,s.
they very poor HtssiO.s md N IN
stances were no ln,ts;iOn. II AL
Mr. Bry an produced Mr. Huutu yton's books to show
his deposits the Bsnt Of the R-pubc Mt Noys
objected the d,snse Iss, p,od.es the B.es books OF Pi
opnis learned counsel Trustworthy Mr. sry,a
Tie pssa. book could not be found.
M Hall iptlmsted ths. footing up, sisued by one
Of the Cisrks Of the Bal /. would do
Mr. Bryan produced st.t-ment of the Cashier of
ssr.ssie Of Mr. HuptnstOr deposits daring
been sSls Sc: IL appeared that he WITHDREW the whole Of
smouLt and % oo besides Mr. Bryan did not to the
Samuel Randall recslled-Me Huntington has often
At me for doing 90 would not anybody
would give him house snd hi. few months before
Paul b. Bu bank va. also recalled as to tn. new
lot and hired il his for Mr. Hununston, from
Let Of ny & .sSn ..sS s :. s y: 90 20
lot about $40 The contract of the
lot Of ., ioose,: W. put IN o sIa oecd ..naS
ss men to Mr. Bishop Hun,nstSn. ptOper,y Pat
,Inmen; to H.beci dated lcth Oct and recorded
18th The ssgnuen special the second ". general
Dr. Won Parker examined and s~orn-Have besn
A
College Of and Surgeons q III. city e.ne SC
dueed 10 ToomS. Mr. Bryan .. hi. request. Nj
Bryan had consultation with me prs,iou'y as r.s.d :" noe
he wished ,teefors 70 v. him professionally saw him
conv...iUn probably, with him; Dr. Gilman .fsr~aId
called my suggestion the reason Why suggested vas
prudence had lee,ured this year physically Hun
prton feeble msr excts'ls and Of fully developed s.ns
my profe.siOn or name not announced to Hun
.h.s .sS, s s he on:
to have appreciation Of his h,uaion asked him II be was
thought net s Intended injure aOybOdy
tailed him about his fsm, had more efec; than
and be- aid becaa.. De liked be I Il be were let
he and bis wife AID come back ,ssn II ne were re-
soin out he would eomnit actions and
e.y when que.toned him about h family to whether
b. had any function and he had none The .nohos Of
any p.rcqSI ,,e; upon h1 M Object Or not Of shfS S
B.. Sc. Fisnc.co had had the Chssr
ws va he s.s ans1u. IDs
his and he stated that be hal suffered very much nom
definite about the Of his he 'aid
thu. be laid BY and be did not care for e IS 70 nus
would msfe 1t the pu's him '.id he Won mo-,
ssp to s.Se;s ID the
hss G Is' s s sn aaS 10 Of S
mind seemed to ). sh. mailing IN Wan ',s,,,
should esrd :. Ss01 t s .1Ss'i Ss
b. uononana where man. mind oPs,.'ss nsniy pns
1sss s1s; .n' Of s,On whsh "a. war ,h
ind this opinion Of mine entirely DEPENDENT upon Nns
be told observed Of hin the torns " nsA
y are various, medical profession bavs not under
takn forms profession eoasees W
nay :, if i Dr. Ray b,
bin ps'0T 1s i ESns ns@ IN
I.nd have no. had ny .t'eniSr called Ned, to toe
s.:a T sls' ,.. 81 Of s. Huntington Tor the
inforustiopI Assuming that those iAss are True, 100
med bin prison. and the testimony that an aunt was
nssDe and uncle Also in'.ne a. ss rsoa u NC,
tendency insanity The testimony f defendant. school
mss sr Day read BY Mr. 8ndy T.i. ,e .ao !,
previous opinion from the VARIOUS sc's
rssd had facts been submitted 70 me witao1s 20,
inOwdss no. have should ,,y that A. this 10 '1 soS
say the sctOrs performed By prisoner were those Of ~
no no se e .eons a.
bu, thew were ths would be this matter
S :.1 ..a. a ne nos ySn
would rfe my impresson that did he want :.
Ss1 s SS.' sas %sts.
vision would be impssd II tbs moral portion Of the srA
w. man thus diseased comes % ioYsa conclusion,
,..nes nan i.scIns ands II, a.l s.,aa,
| caution to k.ep out Of this" way
Mr.. HALL-We don't all believe that
ps,. s5n nas:"TI testimony cor arm. my opinion
pecesssry to convene with man WON 700 yss 20 %
| obi. ct u oonyeIsns with defendant u.,.. h.
Mr. ". a s.@s a.y n IL
DehsSs an Of tssn the fr Interview a,tsf
.h %.i ii
else have had consultation Win " sl
and are together the msde college no SsSs
medical man. my lnOwledss butt Gilman and y.ei =
,;t S,,,S ~. B,.n .ad Mr. Brady ~s. a
h9. that s' ni11 nSa .us s ' to sn,uia:
Hpsn,iOn WITH reisrsnee to Insanity know tina, =. re
s eos :.sss:t thar Ssss Be-
to the pubic suihOrtes acquieseed so far snow '1s
.n,Ssrss re. tie iaot Of such Interview no! Iso
whether Aann.ton w .Ppt..d o. ny H. esup.-
nothing about Hsns stsn's condition eIesp; n.T ~. s sd
Saisf made out BY he vile OAins % the ..ts Of
contained in that psper mast have oesa on, ITO 70
h.nd,. there 10 such thing stimulated insanity ,uPpos
that notice Of an ssn' 'as name you'd
.e,e. snaIsisd insanity; prsdsEi sr.o.s,,ona
L n snlpod fvf
snov nothins about III know that enJoinea Any
thiu1 upon the parties who applied TO ne N fssAfa
| ~. Sation l DO know wheDer h1ntiss,Su -
Nm ,,f 20 my VISIT and do not know nag soy
jors ssrs taken upon the subject. 50 fI y
4. anti, aiecgit a. detect sinolstco
beta OCCASIONS oil ny tsr M 80,
a.. Al ~ request: he on ny ne Sou
s. dsied sop 20 bling housss and De asne tas
r,puson that he had sqs.n hi. HoHeJ uPoa
40 moi Lpow tL.t spksd him ne aasssos oeI Aaa
ont that b, had dole 9TH his Acquidons ny as
simply from bis sppssrAnee ea' no sa eaaaae. sn
AZ ins.r. tbitt his apy p. more m $500