New-York daily tribune., 1856-02-29

,e,o,cns IN resosci to the sovereign rg q tie unts
Britain may cn hire eossse, a. soldies, within she
Hh rritory reasons who ha,o leit tho United states or
.,s 10 persons who have been entced f0u
~. ecrr ~ by tempting offers Of reward such
IN the H xh army hgh wages, liberal b5uute, pcnsous aai
n ions of the Roys domsa rged them whdo within tc
Tnited State the oGces aud agcns OF hor Mses
and or snte end TAIN Bri,i-h .o!dcTs sihu tas
Unltcd Sa;es" The .sh do ios Lord Clarendon do.
%, elaiu for h GoycrEme9t e.d whether the B,b oces
hsye not s % hc sroas 10 undcteud Tie Csc,
DC only question al isus -r ntrns oaa Ishts in
. ,olr, fe'wceu the two ccuut-Cs
IN b. ,e~ q. e q-eson - 10 the ieA o. torroy isre
se,xe a. mn icsl Law Il Care8lon i. ulie.ool
eiuisn thai her Ms'csrs aIihprl~ Eufs
. do az ythns ,hn the Hed Sts. short of eistng and
ssi old trsininq r1e a. oders ,r tie British army
xtb Teiect reepoct 90 tho sovereign lights 81 hs coenTy
Al. CO vichhois that no foreign Power
- ts TN; 10 40 eitlf ct The specic scs wlout IL
No foreign roaerc by s agents or oitcrf iswuy
tie territory o. another 70 enlist soldiers for it, service or
70 or trsn thern therein etce pc!On away
xaer o he e,,!is'ed iihogf cHpross 1eruissior
This rule Of naiional sw' va red 50 wei get
eA deemed reccsary 70 invoke the ihory Of
international swhas questioned ssoundne, A. ms import
nt pT eed by Lord Clarendon and es lie main
cse 70 establish u 6y rcieroce TO 10" esileH Sy "e"
Il denincbce upon the Law Of Nstioos.
Since right Of ranE soldiers ss right of msjesiy which
,snnOt b. violated By foreign nation, is Mt permitted TO
soldiers ihs ertoy OF another without ihe consent OF
ystel sys that tho nsu WHO undertakes to cu soldiers
country without tie so'oresHs Perieon sad
III general whoefor eu1cs away the subjects Of smother
s.se violate. ono of the mo. sscred rights o the prince aud
ss N;on e de- es the crime by harsher names ths
shoo.e use Which," he says puLished with tue
Utmost severity in eycry weregns,ed STATE Eatel fur
h observcs that IL s not presumed tsst their hiss
kss red them ifOrcg recrgitsrs crime aud
supTosns that they ned received such order they
opsh hsTo ODE 5heir sovereign having night
10 command what is contrary 20 the law OF nature
HsnteeG Glc French author OF much rePue, ro
a,rsl power behgsfei though extended 70 both, to
,se recruits territories unes. &c allowed ia peace.
There clounded distinction in he iue OF inter
.ionsl lay eei''een rsas 'oas[s tor e1ssfs army
Hsuteieule says; Tie ntsI sovereign Is hdet oh! lon
Again he says: Tho prohibit in sb.olue
aiys company, reduced by combat OF aliy other cause
The prohibitions 70 ege sailors on the territory 81 pa
sc prince extend foreigners VINO aye Ouad in tho
s his juIisdc,ou and to those wno belong The
aerent nations owning the vessel that wishes to couiee
Rsereneos 70 other writer's might made sustain ii po
sncod by Clarendon but the authority Of those pre-
Ed Is deemed sufficient for mat purpose Ihs Wow o me
Jrsign EDltment bill under debate On that occasion
d Stanley said that tho object proposed by was To resort
practice which for the last hundred the OpLJn Of
Euro cal statesmen had not hesitaiei 10 condemn
Th tho doctrine the subject Of recruiting soldiers and
sos BY begercntson on neutral SOIL which ihs GoserLment
has distinctly brought ont but which has direct bear
7 sspon the question under consideration
snre upon municipal laws. Other powers bound not
4 sbstsin from violating such laws, but to re'pett the
hs British officers who in operation the scheme for re-
ns country, whc resulted ~ Dumcrous Gets against
skv being beyond ne ur sdicton did by such proceed
.rposs besoycs the penalties denoucrd By that laws
nhy violated is policy sud their acts If done in obeii'no
1s orders OF boT Government In carrying out its iurpo
shEovod that Government responsibility Tor thei con
hb he sovereign tight Of every independent siete hst all
gn power shall shsan from a1ho-zns or nstgatng their
ksu or agents DO that. within their dOmmons,
,b would rs n7grsi OF very oeole loe 20
NeontraYenon OF me Tunpa law u su s."e 'hs ne VI
proceedings by Brsh officers ara SSciu ~ I2aN u re-
Dg whu the United States though conducted beyond the
a. thereof considered b. this Government eli infringe
snoBs,rsuce Maestys GsSorDment.
rrd States in respect recruiting therein has created
rgrh more than the restriction he has laid on tbs SOW
fzn rights this country II do not msconceye hs mean
a Lord Clarepdous Interpretation nearly euns tho clause
OF Conges. which prohibits enlisiins within tho
scen aid full liberty 70 do almost anything io tnt
Nc SAYS "a, 10 enlistment The British servve valid
without stteation, end hat according 10 brtsh laws re-
srt cannot be atiestod foreign cOuuy noroyen in Tho
British colonies without specially de!e8Sied a'oy 'o'
Te Other provisions Of the law which forbid hiking retain
a persuns within United States 10 10 beyod the limits
bnof for tho pupoe enisting ia foreign service are re-
hed he nboeiy BY similar course OF t2aso1Is
b made with any witnn the United Staes promises
s 70 Ic all to places beyond mo United s;at'- Territory,
m the purpose Of being enlisted, would be advanced al
IN orie prevent misconccpon as to Lord CeTendo9'
~ nm fls subject show that the differences here de
sed fri n them old another extract iIoh ms
patch the 10th OF November; r,,,,
'Tbe,. can be DO nnesto that the who went 10 HALIFAX
re free compelled TO bo soldiers on thar arrival
ward Of hundred rhmen in ohe BODY Tor ustanee'
ITMses,s Government rightly Informed refused to eu
aud said they IN order 10 WOh on
aac, crs tbore.oTe NOT euli,ted hired or aimed
oors IN thc United States: no attempt was mad TO en-
/ &c sgain-t them any such uiraci or ensssement.
s,eb witch seems 10 admit that e,dsns into foreign mill
within the uited States or hirlns or p
~ leave the United enlist such service would
"A ion OF the United States Neutrality law; 6ni s
tjon amounts = nothing when taken in ecOn with
sdehnton OF the terms enstng, hiring OF retaining In S
saei M the persons arc b0lud, when they have Ter
United States perfect their enls'men then mere mas
en- no violation Of the United States law. such contract
se IN the United States being expressly prohibited oy law
Wild of course be void think ihs CONCLUSION Is iaLy m as
Lord Careudous LANGUAGE; or rather Is ms own
aaelusion. stated by him IN different msiiheI. 1y, 40
II ibs IN these views lncy 90
re he law Of the United States of all srneency ana render
d that law s The which this Government strohnous'y
snntsiIs. - =, ,,.t -. .,...a,
,sreS he sn;ts ths The aw OF United states with
aspect TO enlistment however conducted lot only very
h law imposSd very little restraint upon the British officers
X agents who embarked IN The schsme o. recruiting ~ I
any; lei, them ell the liberty they had occasion U"
- f the purpce they could penetrate every pa % .e
ansy open RENDEZVOUS in sy cry R.on
'sp nducement foI enlistins which OH,ted oa,es oo
tse n rceTuitns troops tor n, own nnS copi
v the srn gent nstructonso often repeated tn them ana
nos % uneh relied on for their lust deaonot violate the
tlied Stot.s law OF neutrality.
rh1s the construction siyen b, hsr Msestys Government
hat law the injunction toviolae could have had very
e significance ard j. not admitted by this Government a.
nsssiabe tor what ws- dote by her Majesty
+ ot sgents
Aer tie most deliberate respectful consideration OF
d Csendons views in his dsch OF tle 18th OF Noveu.
the sovereign Ths Of the United states he eheol o.
neutrality law the conduct o; tho British officers sd
ns carrying the scheme Of eefuitinf thus OONefu'
differ widely from them all
but regard the O1isDaI dessn which he'd tho sane
Of the British Cabinet, dangerous measure wh a
Suld no have without Of thus
jyyer.netA The scheme carving out hat design whtch
presumed devised In the United States the British
,aces framed utter disFesard Of the .i OF Con
and asost every step In ne rrosIo OF executing u was
| ai,nded by the trsnsgTesson OF that law
"a otsyed Nv Lord Cer having acted on
complaint Of thi. Government against the bt,h eihceT,
were engaged IN recruiting within the nted sste sna
pceent condition be performed before thA eoinp1ah