Republican vindicator. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 1849-1857, 1856-09-20
NUMBER SO.

'ilese su'llce 70 snow 'that the "sanctity' Of
tue ~ oo"'t"e'as q l nc'fh. 81.
s'h ~ re Missouri restriction is Of no
'ofce ana eoiiSatlon, not only becauseit was
originally "a o'hcotnsthitutionFl and VOID, and
'iot only because IL mas since been violated
ana rephd'ated by the North, but for asoth-
er indepedent and conclusive reason. The
compromise OF 1870 was superseded mid
|a a. by the Compromise Of 1s50.e'Ile
oonlfon''seYof lo'1V was new settlement
a a "a adjustment between the parties to the
axtes,f dot ~, ~ ~ eouise' ~ 'e
premise clasbhd and aaste. '''': :,, oo .,,,
princi,les of tba forn,orS H. - WIN '1
1890 was abrocatcd an1 s,se ao',,o.nisc y
Sc ~ i I'D Nv H. c. - 1..9peia.
1850 is utterly incons;stant with tba r.,
promise Of 1890 ;ncons;sto,,t IN ,,.;nn;,,l,.
! and in detail in intent nc wolf as 5, atsapt
For. while the Comnronise Of sao a4, s,.
the mower eff CONGRESS- to ;;,,,5s,,, c,ts;l. 60,
rsfsoh State and d geographical restr,et;se,
upon slavery. the fomnronise of 1ss, .s-
serts the eoualitv Of tho States and tho win IN
einle Of Federal s;nterrout;or Nm .I'
nv in tho territories Tbrs tbo" rarar,o
mise of 1885,, snnersede6 and cot ss;aa tho
| Go,nnrofo;so of fso0 ond ,ho MISC; ~.
friction nas renealaJ befera a. -
| Nab.aska Ill 49, a. 60
2 str TO tbis asIr61n,e,,}.s & aannos ba ro,,l;ai
that the two GomI,yo,,;ses ,,,or.to,l IL,
different snbores for in the ,;r.t ,sl,oo a..
6herafio,; of each was copmo,, e;iro.a VII, a.,
tori,l ;nrsa;cton If tbo It'll So.
and IN the seco,,,l ,t.ss, tho connro,.,;aa -
1o5a ia .at,,aII - 49, -,
ton principle into Utah, which lies wholly
ABOVE the iIhe OF 80 90
9th. Besides the considerations which ey.
| hibit the inherent inval;ditv of the Missonr;
! Compromise, there is a special fact in regard
to the territories of Kansas and Nebraska
which makes the application of the anti.
slavery restriction to them a clear and. ;,r.
contestible case of wrong and .ifierXr sab,e
exercise of power. Not only shaye ..Nansas
and Nebraska. at o proper stare If rol;t;cai
developement, the same ripEs which every
othea state Possesses to adopt ~ to exclude
slasesF. but they have an additional sanc-
ton and guarantee of this right, in virtue
OF 'lie treaty d LOUISIANA. As we propose
,F q mere particular consideration OF
zee eiiecs u 'iias treaty IN tiils connexlon,
~ w sulnse ior .he present TO say, that by
Tue coinpac. " snlc1 the territory OF Lou
l ean was efahsiefreu 70 'he United States
, ~ Po"s' was resefNea ana guaranteed to
''. peo,P.e Vi haiis's ana i>epraska to deter
, .i 'ae ell own socai ana poltlcal instltu-
Mons, : :, me treaty Is part OF the supreme
law OF 'he iala, ana the Missouri restriction
oeins III eohniet with IL, was nun and void
iio'" ''ie oes'''ii'i's'
It'll. 1t matters not however, thouob tIc
Missouri Compromise had been valid and
just, and was invested with all the solemni-
ty eta SECTIONAL compact, it was stll MOTH
/ Ng'n7ofc thah az crdiaafy Legislative enact
lnentf eribsd7ibgs tie viii Of the particular
Congress which enacted it, and liable like
every other law to modification and repeal,
according to the wiser experience of subse-
quent times. X Is absurd for any one legis-
ature to undertake. to bind its successors for
all future time, by arbitrarily describing q
particular enactment as a compact and
/ !. compromise Laws are made to be re-
realed when the people will it,
/ ssb FnotIo, ogro,s,,,o Of ao,,a.;o..z.
ea;nst ,be rereal 81 tbe No. II a.:on a.
E tho cboraa tbat il nsorofo 81 -, .i'fic'ioh'
t;or ,,,b;eb ot1;a4,i H. az 'ne aSi.a-
e,.ao ,'',a,,te, no., IT, 1919 o@ noe
yo d r'' ~ '.a,ioh rs certainly
tSa MSsanr; aas - ''I I 70 inc repeal OF
.se o,fsatd Ss,,ano ous &c :, III y. no sense
nv J7st,harco co., - lea,sa ~ .na' measure ,'l
No 10 fho raneal, Cos ,as arc no' 'raeea-
ea,al eo,,mpt;on' II $500 vm .nef9 would be
ia tba Sauth nnntand ise ,ia. a. Every pody
nssand;sa, 81 az :l;as '.'' v'o,ehs pro-
q, III =. il'o 9o.,'.olls.s Is the cause
4 oh p,,t r,,o+ 5can az
~ en,.i,, - Tvs '.,.s oolep'ion amount
81 ,ho M;lso,,,.; 'i'se 'he repeal
Isho,;,;an;sts - nosa ,.son mas p'qsoks' ihc
al D .ha ~ ahu Irn ior
4 n..;o,s IS a. plaol, psss'''1e " 'o i'achi-
j. No aro,,r,a,,t .e h. party. 1t
a,'S .n;. Nv s1ieai OF an OBJ
tha+ i b.s iaw' 10 aihrm
t;ns .,a l's ~ Pait Oh crazy lana
dicat;aa = ~ i ppa,'ea , -. inc VIM
ton Of the sout Y ssa ~ aliu 'he sa'siac
any section. 1t might be commended Will,
| as much reason that tha fn .;t;,,ss,.