The daily union., 1856-01-30

n.u---~~-.s~-ua--~------~
United states supreme Court Decisions
JUDGE CuRTIs's EDITION.
Repoyts Of Dscisions Ia s sspreas Cowt eT s Uaiisd
'aNisfi States, saiA Notes and Digest.
BY caH 'a q ss ss aI,sss sss y ss ss q de eo' 10 -
is ns.nss sdsss so p p%ns.,as Peters Howard.
osus pss sasa TINS ediep, = z yosat, i &C
ed 10 subscribers al The low price Of ~ soume % Se o ~
From the Ja.tiess Of Tie spreas Court Of s Jied ates
We approve The plan Of Mr. Justice Decisions Of The
suprsme Cont United states believe that % sAeensn
BY him viii be Of much uuiy s legal profession ana 70 oas
i0 ft4 ROGER .: TANEY, chief Jusrcr.
JAMES JANE 's.s W. WAYNE, ;ofsiS 1ssciaa Justice.
~ PETER VI DANIEL, Associate Justice.
.A a.a h't RoaEaT 9. caIGR, Assesals Ins1ee.
j. A. CAMPBELL, Associate justice
The s ss.s sssa expressed Of h' work since
From the CAief Jastics Of The Cated siates
regard publication Of useful aud valuable
issued the American have examined ne aral
Judgment and ssrs 1s enaae,ss o. Mr. Jssss
be cIeea,sd when il eomietedir
eann. a think 70 meet The appreciation and support % 81 M pup
JULY july Is.'us ID. isss s. VIC ''4 R. D. TAEEY.
From Judge Mclean Of he United Sdtes SnPreac Court
supreme Court be- coeeuon o. he
pres. editions s.n and as
dmad Proposed in this edition. viii give to y Sssassd @ .sns
From Jadgs ca,ron, Of As United States Supreme Court
] M yIa yo,u%e ar M Wi,
ar.. - have cue eaon win Il
s has dsnrua,bsrsd rspors useless matter
s and me judge and then pes 'sas aa
NAsnvlLrr, July 81, 1855.
From Judge Grar Of the U,ited sfates supreme comt
The plan Of already the sanction an
probation Of tne whole csu TINS volume Che s anp sus
supreme acceptable and
10 a.s s ] G greatly ny s aa
which of The reponed
eins 70 other and similar Ones Proie .sion,
WIN save much ms and labor searching u AZ qg'a
PHILADELPHIA, August ~, 1900.
From Judge Daniel Of the United States SapreHe Court
knowing learning ability of Judge Curtis, with
republication Court The
% plan y % I'm. s s s s o az
an,spa,ans would hs ay acso%p,.lsa amen,
agumen, and the
s ssa ss ssSasy 5 dds. % sai
oo. the bench aud the bar from much sbsI and from ihe M Of
W.snrsoros, October /, 1885.
From Me Attorney General of the United stoes.
ArroRsEy CssrRALs Orrros,
September III, ie55.
Ihave compliance your request,
s now n s @ SMILED Reports Of
Curis and that the work peculiar qaaer
l. In the preservation primary importance
the Of The same decisions with saving q bulk
and BY The omission Of secondary matter such editorial
Of The facts the and arguments Of counsel where
essential the understanding eucidaon Of die
decisions themselves.
In Of
curacy snch Of editerhp
impression existed IN ihs previous reports.
addition each other
decisions Of he series In which the - men,ioned
ao q, rely The scron abridgmspi
hat Of esseata OF the natter selt by means = ia
In Of The head theory Of deai
sIposidons that ,e syllabus of each case exhibits what really
dndgsd ~ as law and thai alone passing over oSr a and
g. Thr asps. Promised viii supply wan, which very sens
have Decisions q The SUI
Court the existing dgess thereof being either anquased or
think these signal advantages present serving
not only Z, render be legal profession eensa
judicial decisions holding s shss, place hs eoee
ions Of the which hoaor and ado the legal literature
" VIC am, very respectfully. c. CUSHING.
Messs LrrrLs, BRo~s, b Co.
From Prot. Pay.ons, Of the Cambridge Lao School
Judge rendering service OF
md Lei show eIsmpe taken ony be-
happened 70 be the hr., how be doe. h
which determines the rules of law appeas
less .h.a sr pages. In ID. second volume Of neh whos
far iess vouminoss and de than those Of bis
everything BY saprsas Cour speak BY
o. and everything further And Ls
the result and Of ths than The original
ns % M ming mn w n s sna 70 hs sIa ss IN
loose mass saves as not only money but ,ms snd labor
LITTLE, BROWN, a Co,
Law and Foreign nookselsr,
Jan 25-2aw5wn liz Washington st, Boston