The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-24

s5 O0o payable equal insments for which amount wig
%oas VAS g By Cook ok q d me %
r"ss @hsrssn ssld fossa' Obtained adg@ea and also on
ans = sad three ouhs thereof the having sold
% a. ana sSia a % ,ss said fSssa. The .hens
ea prngipay sole name
Was used BY ts deisnGaa hs real pny interested
lsh. O The complainant Edridge pro,
and N that eonh'msd the Mining Company
May 1850 previous the inst unon OF The aforesaid suit Of
Virgins aud others against Taylor aud Gray Subsequently SAID
Laueneei and Others formed company working
IL da aa s as S Sopan s ana az as f
said Lsurence had only constructive noce personal
and age ore e rea either OF .he WHOLE or nearly .hs
whas sl standing the record IN the Of Fossa
eouses, ie
Ua,sa States board q land soaaisscas,s IN California hsi
a 81 sn Af q oa a s oa
from the presentation of conflicting claims before the com
Lano. po.scu,sd
s U aS % s % s a ss a. re ss
And said Rose pursuance Of said eem look an active part
The board Fossa, The
lated ,h saia assenSni and ns.ted Sa, he said eon%aon
absolute te said Posat and bis They have
cry in The Alaoc States Eufop and he has MADE and
s 10 s private aaa
clam. California the eoafma'oDs BY ,ns so~msSns Or BY
anal @ a Su q aoa s G ea ss s ssns an
ance. from Cook 10 Taylor and Gray are esopped from deny
ing s % @ o The e ysnSG even s 4 had S bsss p The
Lauencr fossa preensions
Isa as naiy The Aforesaid final judsme".o NoSe%Ssr lin
are violating their wn sad Rose concerning NE
complainant him from eoas using his property
that legal ali land med Of Fossa
legal @ ha' %Se 4
,aomed the comp's,nan, that eds for the combination
ad Of SAID Roses agreement with
consulted complainant propney u
such agreement The roahnan in the name Of Fossa ha- been
The United district for northern district If Cali
from Attorney General Of the Unied States order with
appeal and nu 70 obtain M the name Of f"s
him and his s de and the eomp inani
The con nunt advised that by in
,e' 9 oamsa be ennso, maintain peo" 2, or o 10 equity
GRAY. is eiz" vsna, bat has failed 10 lgas The mater IN
say p,ysni, Diunetau issuing ofihe
% % ss :" S ans a a%s '
hs grant 20 os The deed from darios % Cock The two deed
March, 1850, pursu thereof
Gsps ss ns Gd S"s and Sss
r,rua ? s4 8y virtue Of THIS treaty and Of The legal titles
claiming .eeds wife
- sa n az % s%es RAM. anS ~ m 20 eS 5
" any aeuop board of California
for him.ef said Gray
treaty, hr laws Of aud the constitution
UnI,rd pec,aiy p,.d patent
ud that said rgh be de- reed 10 be charge said
the aBd aien that ~ psente- b.
companHn,
nm 20, ina no paeui tights
ecured der " 'hs cont 1h
defend Edrdge
aufensI, sstng iand,
ieoT &c Sr, and r'n violating
agreement Rtss the eff Ct 10 b.
The hill also he Hen Tha
issuing gr niing denyrRg patent sid Charles
hn confirmation made
favor d-frbdan have answered this hi
further oftse and fr order of pub
dsfundans The bill also ir
from Cook Taylor and Cray and said uds
Eae- and Fo preclude claim their
the complainant and said
aforesaid ented the benefit
of the aforesaid
right said granted by the from
Cook Tp0r and Gay End that said iauence Eldndg and
interest rancho oTEnay conveyed bY Cook ay
tray shopld patented the oi
F'rssu prev DUSTY o hs huai decision OF The
thr tiis' the sad Henry Lanreneel
Fosat wiBm WRgns the heirs Of James NJ Jones' nd
ihsn, idents OF the Dc
complainant by c,u< Of this order
published hewspaprr published Ia the city Of Wash
pgton said Dsct, twice week for six weeks before The
Monday OctOber notice IN the said absent de-
and substance Of SAID bill and them 10
ppps 10 by solicitor, be the said
Monday o October neat INC pfemse- and show
csuse any they have why ought prayed
otherwise, the will be taken for confessed,
BY order Of the
JNO. A. SMITH, Clerk
True copy-Testi JN0 A. SMITH, Clerk
June 26-2aw6w