New-York daily tribune., 1856-05-20

siine BY Of the church Buf siutinE sss
syf with Spp sssio Or nscsss.ry Implies h may
ssi.d, did not tie Presbytsrias ch.fsA M the United
iptetdto Iesds sveboans under Is. term opr..nsn
W y esn t hs subject Of deplDe tbs eert q hs
pIorrr 70 ree.ss I, in the is.t7 Two uoder.so.d
canae, be n ssa .S. sses q.
Of faith sdosed by the General Ascend, OF TIE PreseJ
usd:r The tsr@ sppr.sSn tssn ~sss srshodss
sIi.t' urder che erenmstsnes. e in du. ies
II proper JUDGE Of the Of the term. Of h4
C9n'gon By the Tsst. a.sns OF & - Aei OF o. who,s
The evidence that the frat 0ensrs Assembly Of taePresoy
nl Ssgds e,s. q ss s q: term
sben they adsptsa the soIfesso ef aa .s thsif a
stances eonneeSes With the Gsiion Of the frs asas.
A.sg and "a tn, hoy e As s,'GS; s.sSs.ns ssoud IA
have sndfsteod tae term oppression to incads lsse
Ss % Ds as Srs sss. ss% s.. Il.
able portion Of the nebers Of the Assembly repre-
s Abe upTo.in ,bsl some Of the ms@bsrs Of lst body
ssvebcdrr Can be possible then that thes intend
.,.eopIS se t..tn opsressio or TO Intimate 6,
aaron ss' sas n@s.I :py TS se9 eeaS Of G
pinsi Tn. psde Ened persusded tbs, If such idea
%o1S n,S Stes c Ssae ssp sas o.hsea IL s
therefore, believe that no one justified IN inier1as
1 The srs.f construction any iu,caoy q the cAurh
regard ssvehodins. In any case. AZ efsnee in ts
denying 10 the Assembly the power regard slave
hOss any case, an ohsnss in the .sns u Tac tse er@
conceive that the abuses Of th, reion Ike h-s Of
wsy rre.cIibed by the may treated oasnvs
ii DE sense which the I'd the Boob Of Discipline
whs i .e...sry 70 .ub.enc. sDa comfort ana dss.rSs
the spiritual OF those care sias
pohbed the VI Prssb, erian Churcb
be subjects o discpe whether hey exit in
eetor with syehodDg or the rotation Of husband and
aLd chio Of master aud appreutcs The
der cd coDite that there obvious distinction be
~ sayehotns auc the evils incident to the reIson AMI
CT ureh may the subject OF disciyns the former ben
ofense L. any case The master to whom child bOu
spTrece may him eruey, and if he member of the
BIT sto say h, he !. liable e the di.eP u he
fnt ss ts .fs.sSs SeioT. Church ja"toy for eus
I' amet toward bic wife end ca d,n But can lawful mar
wopid der the dduul subject discipline for sustaining
it, There msy be circumstances when individuals would
ton But the Church judcsory take oaly Of
the abuses q this reson sd not Of the RELATION its In
fern these soIs III life the undersigned would
not be Understood . placing saEehodns uPsn az e9uL to
ppep. that b. eonsers vital to the scecn aadsr eoasd
GRAFTON to wit, that While de qneney In performing the
which 81, deshsed in the sta ds d Of he Cbnh may rem
der der liable to the Discipline of the Church be
Individual invested h The light q exercising los,
Len p,D, to express the sentiment IL the ,ispts,
Ssbo ea.c,rs Of psr.onsi .e'yce. without con-
cent % relation established by the laws Of tbs lands
member. oi Church under the OLD Testament
among hose whom the Apostles admitted into the Christian
Church II admitted 10 the resolutions passed BY the Assem-
bly Detroit the relation in itself sinful IL may
be aud Ike other innocent relations in fe be
individual sight Of God II
@ ae to the s a. Of he & r.. ne G S
cruel Of h, wife o. the PSeat for unnsrcfq col
in consequences Of overlooking tins distinction beweeu rsl.
ton that h confessedy innteen ia ITSELF aud tbs wicked
sbuses Of that relation, that the Assembly a. Detroit
I'D o
In tho sense Which That term is used Ia the Book Of De
bot aionsucb exist IN other relations 10 fc
be relation ,tsewe oense in the in which
the used iD the Book Of Di.cine While the under
would consider the mode in which ths declaration
ICES the hsht Of the lower juaeiatores 70 institute
discipline against stakeholder for cruelty toward hi. slaves
involving etsIee of cruelty, brought regularly bfote it.
the basis Of common answer Synod nssects TO
elites st sed be practiced 10y It's members IL be cited
appt before the Assely answer the charge Of dsln
S. sS Consider 4. subject an 70
The view Of he synod oircuO .taes. may require Ta in
fe.d by the constitution o the Assembly In reference
q I se s n 20 S as hss
bSS s, o, I =. ss S
IL. rssou.ions BY Assembly Detroit ito which The
,b eorst,tu ion is udested set and inssmuch
bly, sudcia power vita respect 10 ohen'es only
epce comIiuint or appeal Of Review rno
Assembly at Deto 70 % wa, not co". Seo Of asw S.s BODY
trspseepdsd It's power when it declare ssveho ding, in
ed IN the BOX Of Disc piiae Interpretation Of th
Constuo by court OF the chuchn Judlel. act VIII .o
be oues,uIed body possessing both advisory ana
judics oower the Constitution y .d.ory ca
osen ens In the Con.iu,ioD Of the Pre.by Cburch
made fer securing Judicial eeel.on Of the Con
tures ,hs Hence. when the Assembly in.
tests Ss set. s ,udei.I capseV sat
neither Constitution the practice OF previous General
Assemblies authorizes the Assembly to interpret the Consa'
tign in Q
eitIne is brough. before the BODY by reference. or
ant appeal; or uuess the Assembly acts .. court
AssIt therefore, FROM the anom.ous
Court Of the Church declaring sestr.c ~hs' s Ss ode. So
Ia the in hh the term used IN the oh of Diseae
tie vdned considers that the Assembly IN Detroit trans
ceIed s skiDg this decsrstoo, when there no
judicial ass esened decon and hen h wssnot ca led
usn count Of revi.~ For tne'e reason me Ger
Of the Coumttee as 10 the mode
in The Constitution brought before the A,.emby DO
nGIea 1 % y bs 1sgstst~n Of the Church In his jads
out iis legitimate results would place The tights aud
the ChuIeh lssds q irresponsible court sovsrned By
udce and caprice and setns without resH 70 the wntts
Costituon by 9hch all profess to be controlled IL would
iu.ty ,ou,berI session prs.bytey 10 dcpiinins ms
ber minister sbolitioI sentiments: the Promussaod OF
a. with the demands OF humanity IL would
,ueet he NJ T.. or AIT. u ,ss CaDa
ton would eosnder the other in that ishL ins
."bs.r,. IF ,h. foundation upon which tbs P,sby
Church wit: written Coesntson de.tnstias d'
tircty what Of tho Ckuoh essential 10 ortho-
d. and morality. ,-.,
Ie ioow utons express the views Of the undersigned
Is IreseDted III this rePort ,
l. RssO,ed That the General Assembly IN vhtue OF m I'D
y.oy Low err bear testimony assinst sny'hns may
reafd a. ON Ia sight Of God bat ths testimony has no
suilorsti,e or blDdins effect upon the law Judicaons
ke.ored That the General Assembly can regard nonns
ber,,y or ofrnse IL the In winch that I'm Is used
In the Beck Discipline which Is not distinctly ssed To DC
. i the Of Faith Of the Preshyteraa Church
Rs.slred That savehodIns Is not alluded 70 etnei
dtrct, OF nairecy IN the CVu ssion OF Yarn Vi the rf
burth the relation s Of master and servant etaot
IN sy case Of disc as before any adiesofy oil 'n'