The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-22

sseGO payable In equal inssmen Wig
sa % s1 70 % s s
s",,s MhsIson s9d fossa sbia.aed adnes aud aise
s," - SAID IaAe aniey three having sod
2 S Msst y a ss soa 9Is S one ssa - ,es,d
dssd 70 fossa dated August ~ 1854 said Fssat not
s a'sa ny s as..hassi a,eHse The rai patty interested
fights o e soapaina and se desnSan doss aso pro @
l.ss 70 be insetted theen In 1860 sSd aurnel and Others
ana ~ that part eonaed na Guadalups sinins Company
"a May, issv, peyeu- 10 lbe Aforesaid
ws a"a ohs,s ss1,ns Taylor and Gray Subs ausn sad
s %ne, during ns enas1s 2, saS s a"d a hs ps
d Lanence had oy nohes but actual personal
snomisdss @ Of the titles Tue dsndan. Laaense
whole, a' standing 'seori in the Of Posa
eoas'ss he sa' S-os the uatsa states de court n Cali
9a was also e,nroysd ny them @ obia'n The e he
ie aei United on representations by
iays irtm the Prentaon ii conflicting claims before The
prosecuted
,ne name OF sad Fa.a beiug uaentaod thai he ao aud
sand Rose of said active
% r. sS s
s a % na s s"a S."s a 9s % nS
vested absolute e III raid Fosat and his They have
ey slntr. " Eur p has nude,
81 = ID @ ~ 70 and TO- & pso
California ls conhmauons by the commissioner, BY
appneaS; proprietor deriving
ing the u.o of The vendor i had Imperfect ,s
Laufencri, and fcsra' sl their fraudulent pensos
nuity aforesaid hnal juagoeu. November ilth
@ a. are violating hsr WIN sad no Rose hs
complainant, him assously properly
legal ie ali the land eaSd med 70 ns
] an s Gaa1 o. n .s s Z % a"
Informed The eompla'aan that proeeedsss 70, the confirmation
DID in toe OF sad Rose agteernent with L'w
nor had said Rose eousue he a6ou, prnprey
such The oafrna'i"n in the FossA la. been
United distict for nor.hen district II Ca
TAI" from The aioi"y General Of the Unisd states an order with
aid appeal and Thu to obtain patent .hs Name Of F.'
him side, and The comp iDant
The assi.sd as Ss S.aon Of s |" he
!" he oaiseS sas. Ga, count Of California M
Cray + cssn q Hna b. 1 I ss u ss M a,s
.a,y siep injunction he s,uISs
es s ns uS Is
ns so ss ] a and % NO s Sssa Ss Two S s 5
& ss';ss"ss ,S ,sss ssIss
s %
February s. ny Vitae o. ms a and s s Legal ae. .aS
claiming a,d seeds fem Cock and wile,
sa.s i, Fs ] ~ 50 '%1s derived
q sa sssn @ ct @ GsSs @ S @ e:n
himself aIa s,dgny :y',ins r%., c
SSns.ad eaty the laws Of nauon and eonsdaon
n,a States pecRl la patent thai
that said rights be de'eed 10 be charge ON sald
lands hand that su psentee mny be-
decrced the complainant TO reeoavey to
h " INA, no patent until the tights tho com
p propsJ prasd uoder decree 81 ths court Inc
pays inJuncI0h restraining The deiend'ns, EdFa
ceiling said lapds, nom disturbing The
the thereof &c &C., and violating
with Rose the eject 20 be
confirmation The b slso that he Hon 1nmn,
issuDs gniing delivering patent TO the sid Charles
OF tho eonhraion made
the drfrudaas hsv. answered this bii
and for order OF pub
can abseni defendants The bill also prnys for
Taylor ard Cray and said JudI
rehce Rddre preclude any clam their TO
conveyed by a saIe that the complainant nnd said
Aforesaid entitled % the beGthi
u under the aforesaid confirmation 10 th" eI
rights said rancho granted BY The eonveance from
Cook aud Grayi end that tad lahtence tddg and
sad rancho originally Hyeyed BY Cook 10 ay
Gray should be patented the OF
f0ssat IsylOusy the iaal decsiou nf the
thA' The fad Henry Laurence
arIe Yosss William Wsans, te heip OF James jones' nd
thsm e.idenis Of the District
complainant by cru cgpy this order
pabshed published 10 The city ~ Wash
said DscI, twice week for sI weeks helofn h,
Monday OF October notice 70 the said absent de
The object aud fphstance OF said b and warn them TO
appear In by solicitor, tefts the said
Monday of October ne 70 answer ms prsmse and 'hnw
cause why decree ought prayed
Otherwise, Tie viii be taken for confsssed.
by order Of the
TTstl yNO A. sNITH, Clerk.
True eopy-Testi JNO A. SMITH, Clerk
June os-savsw