Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-16
NEW SERlES.--N0. 81
CIRCUIT COURT, DAVIDSON COUNTY.

Rule 1st. Iii ordered hy
Clerk shall divide the Trial
ed respectively among the u
weeks Of the Term, so q
at the HEKI OF tie Docket, b
80 as trey are reached.
RuLE I'd. Judgments in u
by default may be taken as 1
RUIZ 81. Il shall be the
days after the adjournment
stated, and publish in one or
eulati0n the causes set for tri
and fourth weeks, 80 tha;
have notiUe when their stfen
RULE 4th. Il shall furti erl
issIing subpGnas for the wit
tend on the frsi, second, d
Term, according 20 the place
Under the above Rules the
trial during the hrst week Of
CASES At JAN
1sf Week.
l Den lessee vs.. Malloy;
Z Ssay vs. Cameron;
5 Morrow vs.. Napier;
{ StandeId vs.. same;
5 Pointer vs.. same;
6 Flowers VS.. same;
! kirkman vs.. same;
S Travis vs.. Wallace;
3 Lawrence vs.. Nashville
II liseOrO' Turnpike Co;
10 Shelby rs. Martin;
ii Same vs.. Netm0re;
l2 Winston vs.. Fields;
1S Walker vs.. Bafes;
IL Mayor and Aldermen o
NaShvi'le exparte;
Is Young IS. Corbett;
l6 Dae lessee vs.. Ray;
II GoNdey use &C. vs.. Mar
shall;
is same W. same;
? baldwin vs.. Mhott;
81 MHsiey vs.. Gillian;
81 Brink'ey " McDoie;
22 Yerk 4 Co ". McKennie
23 McCampbell vs.. Bell;
"a same vs. Bel 3 Robards;
Is Doe lessee ~. McEwen;
26 Jasper ct al VS.. Barns;
% LaEhorn vs.. Davis;
2S Sloan vs. Haskell;
80 McGavock vs.. Gilran
81 Mct3avoek 4 Co VS.. same
81 Jones vs.. Mitchell;
81 Mayor and Aldermen o
Nashville exparte;
S3 State Of Tennessee US
&c vs.. Smell ct al;
81 MeCampbell vs.. Clemons
IS JacksOn's Ex'rs vs.. Gil
bert Z Son;
So Charlotte Turnpike Co vs.
Spence;
81 Cross vs.. Green ct al;
IS Evans 4 Smith vs.. Shivers
et al;
80 Forehand &c vs.. Farrell.
40 Chilcutt VS.. Mcintyre;
Il Martin vs.. Armstrong,
az Crunk vs.. James;
43 Charlotte Turnpike Co vs.
Spence,
4i Fay VS.. Sloan;
As Ayres 4 Matthews vs. Gil
bert;
&c Hyde vs.. Maddox;
~ Davis vs.. Moseley;
As Charlotte Turnpike Co.
vs.. Spence;
20 Hughes W.. Gilbert;
30 Allen vs.. GOOurich;
81 Frazier vs. steamboat To.
ledo and owners;
50 Goldberg vs.. Hinton;
So Harris vs.. Smiley ex'r;
81 Btnk Of Tennessee vs.
Greene et al;
IS Mckee admir- va. Noel
IS Same vs.. Same;
q Bank Of Tennessee W
Newsom;
IS MeGAvock vs.. Paul ct al
80 Samc vs.. Tucker ct al;
2d Week.
60 Wilson ex'rx vs.. GOODWIN
e. al;
81 johnson vs.. Raiclife;
90 same vs.. 0rton ct al;
63 Manufacture z Company
W. Hobbs \ Henly;
g Lowry vs.. Dabbs;
G5 Adrlphi Theatre Co vs.
Greene;
SO HarTison 4 Richardson vs.
Boiling 4 STRATUM;
e. De La Yergne vs.. Dodge;
IS Martin vs.. Ensley;
GO Williams & liitchinEs W.
Glover a Boyd;
~ Bell vs.. Davis;
II I 4 n Railroad Co W.
y. o. Love;
u same vs. Walker;
% same vs.. Gee;
"A same vs.. haynor;
15 same vs.. Sledge;
T6 Martin vs.. Fusseli et al;
" McEWen, Use &c vs. Nor
ton ct Al;
rs Watkins vs.. Barns;
~ Nance vs.. Moore et al;
81 Pa quett W Austin;
81 SneEOg ys. Roberts, ad'r;
81 Sloan ex'rx vs.. Halle;
So earn iehsel ". King ct al;
81 Hail y We. Wetmore;
IS Wilkinson, ct al W. Gin
ard;
Sc Eatherly " Vinson;
81 Morse & Son VS.. iiess;
IS Nash & Char Turnpike
W. Spence:
SO Bell trustee vs.. Me Donald
80 Bell trasts e vs.. Samuels;
81 State Of Tenn, use, &C
vs.. Dodd;
90 Dotson admir- &c vs. Dabbs
90 Smiley vs.. Demoss adm;
20 ChildTess vs.. Jackson;
95 Greer vs.. Jordan:
PC Hammer vs.. Carroll, ag't,
81 Ament Vs. Taylor;
Ss DrLahay vs.. Lawrence;
~ Cunningham Us. sl'Combs
A Cornelius;
100 Mclaughlin vs.. kimhro;
l0l French W.. Duncan, Nor
gan 4 Co;
log Lowe admir- vs.. Siean,
les TAJ lor ~. 5 Boat Beauty
et al,
l04 Gilman ". Kimbro;
l0j Matthewson vs. Philips;
it6 Kimbfo vs.. Watson;
l0T Steel IS. L A RRCo:
los Buchanan W. Joseph;
100 Nancy trustee VI B,gley,
ilO Demoss admir- W. Russell
et al;
Ill Scales vs. Tenn. and Ala
Railroad Co,
tl2 I.ooney W. GriE1ard,
us Burger ~. Brien;
ia Austin vs.. HAYS,
~ , Bland Va. Boiling;
.il6 Boyd vs.. " God ward et al:
III pa Of Tenn ". hcNairy
et al
lis Bells eI'r W. BIZ Of Tenn
ll9 bank Of Tennessee "
Mclaughlin;
100 Jaskson vs.. Bell;
lzi Anthony, ir., ". jackson.
lx2 Beech vs.. Pointer use &C.
W. Bell;
1913 BakeT W Jackson,
la Bowen et nl vs. Steven.
son ct al,
i25 Brunson e. al W. Hick
man et al:
1876 Bank, Planters W. Hud
son,
f2T Bolton et a. W. Kimbro;
Us Berry, use &C. ys. Foster
adn'r
l9e CarteT ". Hamilton el ai
iS9 Childress vs-Johnsoo e a
lsl Same ". DCek Jones eta
lS2 Same W. Jackson e al.
las same vs.. Oven et a.;
iSf Collins ". Gregory.
lao Consss nz vs.. Mounts;
1876 CArtvright vs.. Smell et Al
isT chAvoas ". Dackinscn e
al;
ias Douglass ". Turnpik e Co
i32 Diekey W. Manufacturing
1910 cempany;
40 Demoss vs. Bell;
lfl FsnBiBg ". Bartistt:
l&2 fring ". Zimmerman ei
81,
i4S Paris Va. HuBdley;
it4 Foster, nus &c ". Nc
Nary:
las Goodwin W. Paul e. Il
lac Gresna<ld a Co -sa Man.
ufastuTins Company.
i4I Glesyss Ct 81 ~. jackson
e al
las Gray ". Holt, agent.
l4s Glover " TesrgTapA Co,
I'D Week.
100 Chudress vs. Mayor 4 Al
dxrm<n u Nashville,
i5i Driver " HltcAings;
lo2 hsal Va Ma L Possrs,
deeif-eavsw
CARTERsS spa