Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1856-01-01

dDD'ANt ~ GAAL
ISL Wallace vs.. Acklin:
i62 Thompson trus. VS.. Tenn.
AMI Ala. Railroad Co;
63 Williams VS.. Glover;
"a Beatty vs. Clotfslter;
o 6j TiIlman VS. Williams;
65 PetKay ". wilson ct al;
81 Dunn vs. Breider;
IS Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
r Co ". Marlin;
80 Shute vs n q Q Railroad
Co;
20 Ewing trustee vs.. same;
II y 4 c Railroad Co vs..
Douelson-
= 2 Lanier & Falls vs.. Vanlier
- Livingston vs.. Nash. Gas
}, Light Co;
"A Gilman VS.. Wright;
.5 Lauier Il HcNickle vs.
Tanlier;
76 Halle & Cows. Bridge Co.
u Young Ys. Summerhill;
4 ES Corporation Of Nashville
vs. 2aylord;
[ . 70 Same vs.. Higgins;
iSJ Same ys. Rai'ord;
se ST same vs. Same;
tS2 Same vS. Hamilton;
IS; lS3 Gof VS.. Stevenson presi-
H. dent, &C.
81 Crutchei vs.. Foster
IS. IS Childress vs.. Manned ct al
IlS6 Cantrri vs. Slcan;
ISL Doe. lessee, W. Waggo-
Re lSs brigham vs. stratton ct al;
lS9 Same Va. Craighead;
]; 100 Same vs Havs ct al;
lg1 Bacchus W. Porter;
l95 Bosley vs. WEIGH
Ii93 Cole vs.. Mayor and Al
q dermen Of Nashville;
.i94 Davis vs.. Bradley;
'l95 Douglas VS.. Cartwright 4
l. Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee, vs. Hin
ton;
81 Glover 8 Boyd, use &C
}. vs.. DOllett,
.l9S Goldberg & Co. vs.. lnsu-
rance Co.
99 Harris vs.. Pitts;
O. lun Hays vs. Ealuuudson et al
III Horn aud wife s.StewaT5
2 Lellyett & Ewing vs.. Mills
q ECan:
5 POS H0liins VS. rs man ei al;
PA l!ali0well 4 Co. vs. Hu E
.205 hammond & Co. vs.. Lu-
Gas et 8l;
5 20G Housley ". Hagan ct ~;
lZuT H5Se 6 Bro. V Jscss0u;
j l2yS Hamwell ". Telegraph
Gonna Y
POE Jrh-s son VS.. N0lIe etal,
il : . James s CO. yf. owen et
el
III Insurance Company ".
Peek { ~;
wife jenkins ". Ru-h ~ al;
3 Kerby vs.. Brockw y;
IA Linsey W. BriGge Co.;
s I2l5 Mckinney ys Shelly;
sI6 MeCampbell, trustee ys.
3 Hicks ct a.,
l2l7 Same vs. Mar;
e; us Mcintosh VS.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
s.'2I9 Nara vs.. Insurance Co.;
~ Dd.Oy vs. Turnpike Co.
~ NJ Roberts It al vs.. jack
s son,
20 Oldham vs. Pau, eX'r;
l.23 Pc,way We Crulcher G: al.
"a Pope vs.. Washington.
4th week.
|225 Mining Company vs..
Mitchell ct al.
r 226 MurreN W. Mavor and
Ald'mn of Nashville;
22T Minuett i Winco0p vs..
NcCombs ct a.;
.Z23 Morgan 4 Co. vs.. Vick-
r; house;
229 Mills vs. Stewart;
u; 80 Mart q vs.. Beatty;
23i Murrsll & Ma,iock vs..
n Tenn. x Ala. K Z. CU;
2S2 Owens rs. Johnson;
233 Pofterfeld ys. Beatty;
'234 Stewart i Co. vs.. Hume;
ke 235 Same W. Bowling
256 Samuels, by reNt friend,
I'd ". Mayor x Aldermen Of
Is; Nashville:
s..2}3 ShegDgg Us. Simms;
23S Wright vs.. Crenshaw;
BE- 239 Zimmerman vs.. McNairy;
y; 240 Bank Of Tennessee VS..
Hampton ct a.;
e4t Camuse VS.. Patterson;
; PAP state 81 Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson ct al;
Q 8 Dell vs.. WEIGH,
Ds Z4t Guthrie and wife vs..
IS, Rains;
; 245 Jordan W Davidson;
r 30 portrr =. Bergen.
241 Livingston vs Mayor and
Aideruea Of Nashville,
" 243 Barns vs.. Gilman;
20 Rains vs.. Williams;
S50 Chliiress ". Oven:
; Z5l Corporal On o. Nashville
vs.. Hamilton;
252 Same IS. Higgins;
S;3 Same vs. FINN;
y; 254 Same VS.. Gurnaud:
% 5 Balleutiue VS.. Erown;
256 WoOsfyik vs.. n. and Q.
:. Railroad Co;
Isl Mayor & Ald'men Nash
vile exparte;
25S Mayor & Al :'mn Of Nash
vile exparte;
$50 0lds vs McFadden;
j; a60 Campbell vs.. Crenshaw
~ et al,
2Si Corporation vs.. Moore;
IN 262 Morrison vs.. Grah IAN;
: sCS Same v. same,
"a SAME vs.. same;
26j Same vs.. same;
D. 26 Same vs.. same.
c. s. Same ". same:
0o Pinksrt0n We. Crenshaw
et 81;
J. 80 Smith & Co. vs.. Same;
.27O same ". same;
( i17i SaEae W. same;
zT2 Fame vs. SAM,
J. 2T3 Cmlsiress vs.. Hampton
ct al
, 2T8 Jones vs.. Nance;
r as Leake VI. ilaEell;
ZIG Frey et al ". knight etal,
J Ill Jackson ". Bell,
! 37S Dcdd " Henry 4 Skinner
si175 Pope vs Washington;
IS same vs same
.3ol same ys same;
2Sl Peck A Bliss vs. Morton;
.2SS Pointer " Bell;
ESi Pspin " FoiEol;
-tEs5 Peek vs Carter et el;
1s6 Paris IS Jackson
} '4sI Seay, trustee " Tarpley
2 4 Pyle;
.2ss shntc vs Bigley;
2>9 stevens W Hamilton et al
2g0 sbute vs Hadley et al;
I l9i same W Williams et al;
192 Van Dyke, admir- w. Pearl
90 " Wsldron " Scruggs;
ci2qs wsrmoth " Casey;
495 Whilworth W SeAluny ct
4 al;
] 96 EeSi vs. Brown;
tgJ warren " Union Bunk;
D las Afford ys scales ex'r,
kgg 6leaves e. al admir- ys
k0zeii e g.;
!. 500 fame ' Goodlett et al;
sol fame Va Hat e al;
3 2 Wis u W Carter;
SO Whiteman vs. Carter.
SOt Lzuier a hsNickls vs.
Ewing, pek a Go;
THO. T. SMILEY. Clerk.