The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1856-07-08


which mortgage was a. % 81 o assigned By Cook 70 The eendan,
another note held by ha and the tenannx interest OF sad Wig
IN ead anehonae, three iouhs thereof (he having sold
to said Weller and divided fourth unde
sa sdisn. qAa ga she'll ssls 70 SAID fSssa. ihs sheriff.
party really principally Interested said ses ssie his
ss used y h % % he real ns S
sa 96 % @ sssS' s,s .Ta s be sa sss ss Mss f9 Ds
= that confirmed Mining Company
Ma a & s,ss s ~ s'oS Any he M IS. q
% J.s sass I s is'
a &c H., had nj Sy % a
whole, l standing s record the nae Of Fosa
ssi 10 s su Sso,e The Unied states disiei court il Cali
ona was also employed BY them TO obtain the confirmation BY The
against The United States o. nude " said
sn s he .ns
a y ~ m0.a assed Win said ALLOW s In.'o
Torss being understood thai hr shape and
d as oss n as
was sn ,as s wss q s oa @ q s os,Sss s
aoenrs Eddge, and their associates audusnty vio
dspusi n.s sai Edsss sell aid prop.
g 4 make. 70 % Under as as. q
claim. California Tie coaImatons The By
ns United sa'es ceI snare to the bonea no. q The nom
apparent from Cook BY deeds subsequent 10 The convey
q % ssS aS ss
ms Of Me st,ihs u Taylor and Gay The defendants Eddse,
disregard Cook to Taylor and Gray
as yo As & %a Win @
elect &c aad confirmation, and thus disturb The possession Of the
on s fIs iii sSssss % %
that The legal ,e TO all The land conf med name Of Fosa
ko.e Il
d a @ s' ssn s
did moi hiofn the Of said Roses with Law
had said Rose consulted The complainant o
the and "1s pending
10 the United States dislc. for northern district Cai
an from The General Of The uni,ss sa,es order
s
wesn him and his the one side and The compl nan
The y adyrd that sy h's ,ns
Ss 6as sss y
Gray - Citizen q Virginia bat has failed 70 isa,s ,ne matter
say steps 70 prevent By injunction iho issuing Of The patent
cS aa S and u"Sa 1s
he grant TO aos the deed from aos 10 Cook the two deeds
March, 1885, and assignments parsuance thereof
& as @ e % s"s s % a
February iss By Of this treaty OF the legal titles
Claiming under wife,
a al hum nes s SnS ~ m T.d nn @
any the board land California
patent himself Gray surviving
rights should protected
aforesaid treaty. the laws OF nauons and the constitution OF the
% e s n psa s a. aS pssS ns
lands the haBd OF aiente pseniee
complainant recouvey
shall until the rights OF The
pinant properly secured under decree Of thus court The
bill prays injunction restraining deiend,ns Edrdgc,
Laurence, Fossit selling lands from disturbing me
the thereof ac kc and violating
said with -e the ct 10 be
given to ssd The blu also thai he Hon Ihoma
issuing granting, delivering To the said Charles
Fossat OF the confirmation made
his unl the defendants have answered this bill
and until the farther order the and for order Of pub
location defendants The bill for
from Cook Taylor Cray and said udg
November II, 1884, valid and bind said Lau
rencel Eddg preclude any claim their
he property conveyed by said sales that the complainant and said
aforesaid entitled beueht
the rights said rancho granted BY the from
Cook Taylor and Cray end that tad Laurrnce Eddge and
fnssat be ordered mnch OF the rights %
Ia said rsncho originally conveyed by Cook 10 y
Cray the should in the
fossat previously the final decision of the
And appearing the tha the said Henry Lsurencel
Charles fossat William WigRns, heirs James NJ. Jones' and
John Bowie thsm residents the District
complainant by cause copy Of this order
b. pubsbed In published IN the city Of Wash
said District twice week for weeks before The
fourth Monday OF October notice to the said absen,
PENDANTS Of the object and substance OF said bill and them
appear by solicitor before the said
fourth Monday o October premises and show
they have why decree ought prayed
otherwise, the will he taken for confessed,
by order Of the
Test; JNO A. SMITH, Clerk.
True copy-Tost; JHo A. SMITH, CLERK,
June a6-2aWow