New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-11-05
La " LNT,ELLIGENCE
COURT or CoaaoS PLEAs-GrSrSAL rrss.
pYCISInSs

COURT or COMMON rLEAs-GExFSAL rrRx.
DECISIONS.
Frederick y Paterson sgt. the Mayor Sc Motiss
frn.w si denied with SO cost Judgment ordered ks DO
JOHN Teas sgt. David Chgstie. Motion denied
Gtorse Allen sst. the Mayor sc. Motion for new
ms, 'rsDtec. e0... 10 stes 'he event
Meirn aCk MAJ ufhcuritg company AIT. Thomas
GsereT End others IpGnetoa dissolved Co' 70 aide the
Judgment affirmed. viz: Ch.rles ". Auberger ACT.
Airvo tsNm; Nehemsh MI ard -, Chuss Sr.d sy:
yohs Mocty So JeSn M,rch>do Es il .nssts sr Ran
pAry; william Lt'ls SS Lewis . Whoa. 1s.; }. %. N.
SorI 'st Sahsni,i {. s,scPi Frederick cosdsr SO
iroUes Thema, ssp1sDsast John W. snsrnsyk-, y.mss
Wbit keJ Jobu Ssc air John V.a w.sner 1o,n No
netboksT Az rhems Hooper John Laurent Philip Neas
baum.
judgment rererse4, viz; james Grant ag, Hesry
Chrys-; George p Oake. est We, Vleatinsi csN,ss
1 LsEnie' sgt J.s Ph Kos snSie, s'o 90 ,s ne Dry
Robert ~ Ma,ieston nat James l. Laaias,'n Eosest
Cszot Car Speimas; Thom,s Fss>n sgt Jacob sssls
THE hsovs.
PLANS, &C., FOR WASHINGTON MARKET.
The case Of Peienoo at. the City. was 10 recover
3ns s.o',ra .0 n M Plan "a ,Ss ,Ss -four o. ~.
NJ tee u the Bo'rd Of rmen fT inquiry {. 80 rseuiaiss
b9sIe' he re.oaop build vetoed BY mayor .ad
a. pd not~n anoins he v,lo-ba he for baains
htorsh Ire present suit red 10 Tbs sad tsd
AMI sier en- exception, TO thi' the &c er.l term
eoDcerbl. iepgh rhs court hol. that he commirt.s 81
oS TO the ap %ia &c Only ). dose
BY 'ss ion q 20 ,s sIS s ,PpI.Sss 70 me S.ss
bucn although both Board. 6oa, 'eTeed to ae r-pot
tsyor OF ,doPtns he sS, there ssd been no iam.a
might hsve thu, hey h,i ee,n maze BY him hops
S1 ss w:sS Giy Ss@ se D6 s s .s
tive ,ttc srd msso the AZ Ia the II
az hye that could have been Oven e.
the lowst bidder yet the seeo,das 70 he ehGsr.
the spp d, depNtuen. The that l. hard
~ the PSa'; bu' the objections nsur noustshs
eerp ration and the city liable Juds for dend&n
CONTROVERSY BETWEEN NESsRs. SUDAN AND IRvISo.
IL the cOrorer examination in toe case Of Baker
and thsrs he DE- Poole Mr. stated Mr. hsA
thu b-fore that he intended to pers,ns
Poole The coue 90 the oc;ssoo Of III. hssss.
corpus before JUDGE ms the hends of living stated mat
NJ. pr.Judcrd sg.in't Mt # Legation
which va, between tssm to The payment aim D, NJ
Iws ued in the M,rine court before Juis. BirdN and
been 'hown t the jury to warrant It's finding tina, the claim f
sp, s e., s.d be, paid sy s S and
proved to be unsasfeoy account Of being uoeuen o.
9hwss hty can o. eansS oy %Si1 ont And a
ct Drnei snd the parties stood as before the psJmsat
The following abstracts Of opinions prepared BY the
judges:
Oskes agt Valentine.
INGRAHAM, +. jim action 10 recover brokers
commissions for the Of weasel evidence Of smother broker
citation had ended was admissible.
The dscson of The asier although he msht have hAl
authority make the sale from fcs which had esoasy
taken ought be eeoved and his authority act
admissions Of fact bind tbs defendant
Judgment reversed
STAGE INCoRPoRATIOSs.
Bouup sst. Dry DOH Stsge Compay
Woodbury., J.--UDder the act providing for the
and Cgspssion Of stage companies sws Of tsA
the subc by ders do DOT b,coms payable
the subscription, called for BY resolution Of scAs q
Directors The OF such srb crip) cannot u.refJrs
b the de- na,t the sgsius c d. ~
RIGHTS OF PROPERTY.
SITES hens sgt someiindyks.
ISGRAHAM, +. Ut is not necessary on q CON
psin for shrg te property of the plsnd for the ,td -
the defend show bis authority Mere po,ssssa
Of property Sufficient TO msiosn such scton asiaH
wrop s-Soer without proof Of ownership
ASSESSMENTS PAID BY MISTAKE.
Allen sgt The Mayor. &c,
WOODRUFF J.-Wrere an O~ner of lots il tilted by
til. corporation o this city, tbs, his os have bsss sssssd
the uafs of the which they located and
required and be thsreby msled and under naks.
and 10 isnoi OF the cs he psys the ssseene he w.
dnc that his lots not assessed bat that the
pn fsois en'ied To back tho )ny paid
paid Ut der mistske.
The me ccumtancs that b, tho Of diligence sad tie
Examination Of record. in the possess -
not prevent recovery. New trial grated.
BILLS OF LADIsG.
Fsssn sst Wseks
INGRAHAN, +. Jan ASST gnor of a bill of ladsg u
only liable for freight Cd the goods Iecsysd by him Where
third person purchases ths cDs soc rdins
b OF aoips took thereof he had rxht
insist up, delivery Of the coal according bill IL
OF not delivering, The carrier iisb, Recsivnss
Of right demand the residue according ~
J1dsmeDt reversed.