New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-11-14

u
h,sn INT once NOV on me inject rstber Jided IL;
b mode rome xplapsioo, tbi b, about the pane OF
Com oily but Bis manner was DOT very cfeH nsu
another versaiiOn ri hin 10 the early pa. o. t1e
aurm =. he $50 ed me IL IL true ths; the Philsde
mia IN, ef 10 the Coonoy a. be hen called II,
lad re,ured; did not Know thai be sas aware OF
he seooUd Indictment; the paper here shown TIE
pec,pd tdictnsni II Vss f0uni On lG March 1850,
IN ID. recor0er's mouth sDo then indeed by the
nam Of Wuliam Connolly, which l bal aacer.Ded
10 be lie nal Dame; spoke 70 Jas;ics stuart
sb0ut Il til the tme have uentiO1e1 q bench wer-
rant was issued, do not knog who II ws gym 10;
be was TAX tina, second 0dict nen: 80 Tar az
know; persou call d Ms Go grove called "a 1se-
goebty ct my Office 90 Mr. COsgToye ana FneF ne,
W be Mr.. Connolly oojec ed TO- soa the con 'e'5aaon
not pressed; it was at my pnvs'e Office N Prs-
psoce; l. wGs soon afer my c0nyersau)n WIN Juoge
Stuart hat bave mentioned =,
Cross-e18 DiDed by Mr. B'a1y-My no.e , 10 nI.
sparks s.,d 10 enter a pOlle prOsequi Gs 70 Wuhsn
foppo,y il was dated 10Th, aud The entry ss OF 2O1;
thDf moving thst note beors Judse Sus-t - act
lDp in cour, I did Dtt make aoy mo1oo actually n
eeur; did not intend the note 20 b9 cOn-eo, 70 en-
Ter a Mole prosequi 20 WIIiln Co.'S rove wa have
keld on occeio de court Of Sessions N my ONCE
d. not know per ously hat Toe court Of SESSIONS wa-
open Oh the 1871 2O;o ] Gctsd Ia cav note 70
N. Sparks soeiy iOe representations OF Judge
Quart ,ha. tbe Indictment vac against Connoly;fo
nos reeoleet that ak bin phat was the crime, but
the imprt ssoD eft me was hat " was lgot one;
there "a DO for my Al ming to7 noHe pro'equ
pext MOI ping the Indictment exceptto maze 1t cor
respoDd with the minutes be sss SIZE ward iooiced as
Connolly bscause always try tn indic by toe proper
r,ms; Alexsoder johnson, bel ev- belJnird TO
Pbafe,p,ia; coulO DOT hDd him before or alter me
secopd Indictment; believe Mr Wbltmau ~as $50
abstDt. AL the rsst Of the witnesses we're b9fs Cos
prove has b~eo arestt % the secOnt lofst neot
0e asraIt was pven 10 officer BOwyer who returned
it sbsut ortDis ht ago at my reques'; belt|e 1s-
grove is OF he-e nov; be wa here once since; ne
and bis wife vera Mt my house; they were a, my
bopre in company with Mr. Bnrtis, who We seat In
70 bring them he knew where they were; he had 70
yaraIt; Mr.. FriDk also ibere think RECORDER
Smi,h gave me rbe name; believe Burtis w4s once
nc iced; my house s near The depot and Soen bdrtis
and Conc oily and wife came frUn Bostor they came
10 my bous- 1t while the subject Of the indi;t
xneDt as to Judge Stuar Oeadn< before the grand
ia,y; wished 10 make William COnnOly awlness
bot found he knew Io'hing about IL; understood
he returned TO BostOY; be hal written ro1oe
from me- Tor the Cause Of pubhc Justice, directed TO
coy officer ShO held process against him, not 70
modest or arrest him dated October 2 s1d on that
he consented 20 come on ana tell ms BCoryi
there has been no requisition made for hia;
bis cssa az never been called in the seoOno lndict
meDt, / I'D sde him Stte' evidence, aod Of course
there need Of calling il; be gave me im oortsnt
inf ,Jmst on ss 10 where could procure wines 'es
that could not have got without; be vas not before
The rano jury; told Mr. Cosgrove that If she told tbs
truth her U, DaDd would not be tnedi "hen j toid
Judge Smart next day 20 my giving the Dots, tha nc
hal got Mr. Vsuderyoort and me in sorope ne s9id
be Thought hnew that the maD IA 1e ICES Connolly;
1 did not suggest TO hiu that had done anything
wror 2 about j.; don't Temem Der when IA spoke of
the secosd Indictment whether he asked if intended
70 try il; don't think l made any sns~er to bis in
qsiry; / turned the subject off; toe recorder e.
nizaDt of the second indictment at the time Bufris
went TO Boston for Connolly aud wife he
lad been counsel of Connolly, to the time
of forfeiiiDg the recogDizaI will not cay
that he wished Connolly and vie 10 be
brought as 10 ger jude Stuart indicted;
NOT 20 strong a. that he wished to have them brought
trat nigh question them; Is ITis aud MS.
Connolly and The recorder and mysef mad an inter-
view at he recorder office; the papers for be n1ct-
Of I,du had "a nm nv m q
btfore rsi saw Mrs. Connolly at my office in Broad
way next at the recorders Office and she left prOmls
ing 10 bring Ter husband on the terms which he
was 10 come that if he gave the information ad
Judge Stuart nied, be should not be pcosecuted
his vile TO communicate The terms 70 him. sup
pose Mr. Smith the recorder, to be 0teresel in the
case; bave made Connolly safe evidence ia regard
10 pro- ipg testimony 10 this and la others.
Direct, by AIR. Cutiing-Thls building vas erece1
for he bolcDg of re court OF Sessions; as l hsve
said, the Sessions have been held 10 my office; me
paper 10 protect Connolly from arrest on ms coming
here was itten by at the recorders Otlce; don't
know whether MS Connolly gave il no to me the
nigot succe' Ding he coming here or altefFard; ne
has tuch paper row.
Crosse xsmination Icsumed-Tbink the court OF
SEES ions bso in my Office one occasion wen II
was desrous TO have two brsDches.
yASDERvOORT's TESTIMONY.
Henry NsndervOoTt, ew0ri Have peen clerk OF me
Sessions fifteen years and clerk and deputy clerk over
tVeLtJ five yeas; have oeen acquain'ed with Judge
Stuart ten years tiOce he appointed clerk OF
10
the note of Mr. Hall TO enter MOLE proseql thok, in
the court ro0m 10Th; tOink Judge usrt handed II
to the bench, or alr Spa smsy have shown
Il 70 me. Judge Stuart bold court that Gays Oink II
was the time OF Gdjournue zen saw j.; think
Mr. Soa,ks LETT the court b get the paper next
cav the note IN the cleTk office; near 40 can re-
collect ae the court adjourned Judge stuart AID my
set went into my Office together aud saw MI Sparks
looku for the paper or judge j. might cOms in
In med. tey afergard; told MIN the indictment
hot cd in that could not be found; hs said wait
moment and left, aud returned iG about FIVE or ten
mia ut, be then stated il the Indictment against
Cosgrove Sbich referred to IN the note as | no.
derstOOd him; readily fO1od thst indic 'ment; !
paid him that not the indictment referred 70 by
Mr. Halls note; he then said that was he indictment
he meant; l stepped into Mr.. Halle Off q 20 get hun
D. sign the no e pr seoul nut he wSs not there; Ie-
tured TO the office ana the OfJu 1ge Stuart
that was ali opct proceeded II enter il the nio
utes the judge esked for certified copy of the miu
nes and Appeared 10 be IN hurry; he got il and Left
the CAY following saw No Hall IN lie Off e. having
with me the note aud the Indictment; | presented
latter for bis signature 10 the Endorsement Mr. Hall
beeitated to sign 1t; l repea ed 10 Mr.. Hall what
Judge Stuart had said, that the note intended to
mean Cosgrovei l had conversation with Judge
Stuart TO the new indictment against Connolly; i,
in the park, in weather; ne spoke OF il 70
me being fact, which did not cont a1ict; do rot
recoIeet what he said; he spoke of the young man
wishing 10 return TO the city and his trade
bu lnessi we were walking together for short cs-
lance.
The witness was asked il any papers hsl been taken
from the files and by whom This vas ohc'ed - and
ersusd. MIR. Brady said he had been cit ing hsre sioe
10 O'Clock In the mOrorg in a sort OF DEAN He has
heard poihipg IN all the testimony OF auy attempt 10
epproAch Judge Stuart with br ,e but testimony has
bSsn presented in regard TO inference and undes aud
ING. Unless We have been here charge of bribery
Ne have all been IN sream. The effort is TO
make IL appear that Judge :. took away papers 10
study bow he might get Connolly of, when there ia
notnipg In the charge the second indctm Snt. II