The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1855-06-07

cless But he abe essd MAT sltno1eh seIude. NAG
lug combination were sxhaustsd and that a. every
member Of the Conference hss right % bring forward
early day isr the purpose Of esn.dsriag any
positoDs that might b made. TO that observation
an %:s. not Z
ny instructions were exhausted, and therefore
o; g :. .; =. mo, =, :s.. :. ]. '
conference because ] should DO nnprevided with
any nsustions to discuss The proposition which might
precedent even durpg the present confsren because
during the time when III. Russia. psnpstensariss ware
snoes had been adjourned fro time without any
6Ied day, and, in TACT wasd until Prince Gortscha
s 70
quently meeting Of the conference, showing very
clearly that Va. not entirely broken up but hsd at
French penpotentiary and Minister for Foreign Affairs,
following shat had previously said then stated very
clearly the why his instructions exhausted
'
thas his were since Russia had
sn' The
In proposing limitation to effect what Is called the
not to accept proposal that did not
include such limitation Do Bourqueney concurrsdin
delsraen therefore II is NOT the case, the right
honorable gentleman the member Ter Oxford unvers,ty
those Of aco al q ons
end the two French plenpotent'aries-made the same
declaration They said that 8 the Russian proposal
contained the princple Of the closing of the Darda
nses and the principle Of the opening of the
straits to all powers they did see in that proposal an
Glazed that not even the basis Of an accommodation
was contained In that proposal OF the Russian
Without any day being appointed for their meat
ing; but the Austrian government had declared.
ths, the u. mouth Voons so1 snaa IN
bausted must ray that those discussions
in the conferences the Of Austria had
mot with Russia in the proportions for peace and that
the difference between them undoubtedly was that
tain ready 10 listen any terms which did not
contsin the elements OF durable and solid peao the
unwilling to put forward terms in such manner as
should Immediately involve Austria In the dangers and
Of wsrs
That Ct course, made some difference in tine spirit with
which the propositions were scussed but with
regard to opinions and moral support there could not be
support than the support given BY the Austrian
penipotentianes. Cheers II is not only difficult,
peace, which. as consider, they come At all, naus1
come from foreign governuent, aod not froz oar osn
thsr the proposons lead to peace OF upon
that sson feel my,elf incompetent TO give an OPT
hs :, me
bers Of those conferences. imagine that proposition
must have one 9, two Issuts either i win be rejected
the conferences broken Off and, doubt it viii be
perfectly competent for any member Of Parliament to
,ons or, the other hand, that should not be the
case, then, again. regulations win be resumed. and
peace berg ssssbi,hed DO not think It is possible
for to say any than have said. (aear, hear.)
s II @ Sps a +
merston was vague it is because there nothing def
nts Or Paeoi,s IN the situation 9PpSotHs .t
is in itself ysgue finite The condition Of things
therefore differs most materially irom the supposition
Of the honorable and learned member for
at any time In any proportions for be
made party 70 another There have bsen CON,
terms Of peace The four befserent Powers have not
as.esa upon ,lSs. tern: Of peace Thsrsors those ne
Suspended are not definitely broken off, (Oheers)
DO not tnow that can ado anything to this state
i VIZ Ss e for the @ b
At and ~batever that be, We shall always be ready
Ct any time to meet amp proposal which he may deter
mine TO submit (Chsers.)
Lord Palmerston ON enc Vote by Ballot
o. May % Mr.. corpHs submitted bis annual motion
for taking OF Votes by ballot England to The House
Lmd PAIMERsroN ssid-I should be sorry If my honor
able tr end the member for Bristol to imagine,
which he might DO, that he has convinced ma by the
tive sodrers which he has ths House this
ming. In the few observations shalt make to the
1hen have often heard made use Of BY the advocates
Of the ballot that thosc who oppose do pothing but
Which tte ballot has BEEN resisted conclusive in
their that you might well complain that there
hat Which L. sssH Sstors pus
aS s Of s ..sn pS p.sa
friend the member for Bristol that he privilege q ssc
eomnuny not for their own benefit but Tor the ssasa
Of the nation at large. (Cheers) hoid, therefore,
ought to discharge that trust in the face Of the country
!IeIewed cheering); and every man should know
been proved that, though there may be in tho
present mode Of voting bribery in cases and init
either Of these evils lHsar, hear We are often told
although have not Heard 4 to night that onght to
the United States votes are given BY ballot That
is complete mistake bearing the proposal
voss n 1s
profess to be secret Secrecy not the object it is
in 9ISs that Votes may 30 given at
far from votes being secret It 10 we'll known in the
nea ssts. how every man votes a. i T. in this
Of Their votes as aye the electors Of England, and would
sso,n to have their votes TsSorasd under secrecy
fa 'Ss ~ou Sss Ss
would ns to NJ ias a tsss gsa
could pass could eempel the majority, Of the
seops '''s the Sodea
opinions which they entertain. why, Whist would
happenS The great bulk Of the electors would give their
votes publicly while II would be only the who won
60 rneakpg to the poll, ard by attempting to sore
,hepaslves from some perfonsl inconvenience would o
come the objects Of general obloquy and sink In the
timation Of their fellow. sar hear) These
are the reasons them why TANK that this proposal of
vote BY ballot for members of Parliament ought not TO
be adopted behave it would be Intellectual for the
purpose for which is intended, and would in fact be-
come great public evil. The house was very mach
amused the proposal Of the hon. member for Bodmn
(Dr MchelD but for my part, think that there was
much more logic in his proposal than In theothsr
of re hall do
grounds Of perscns profession Of public personal
convenience that you want to the public be-
vote according to his opinions2 If you mean to
screen persons frim individual inconvenience in
the discharge OF their duty, Why are not the
members Of this House entitled TO this so called proe.
ton Is web as the eIectors2 Hear And you intend