New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-06-18
Points TO The ADORE.

SUIT AGAINST RAILROAD COMPANY.
Thomas McQusy sst. Eric Railroad Company.
Plaintiff was a newsboy, or rather man, for We
believe be is twsDyope who had been employed for snoa
sRs nswpp' IN the Es H., sGsa ca. s.s s he
Company agreeing pay certain Pcs for tho privilege o. u
ssss%n the Company should not b liable njsry
occurred to the persons % mPo,sd IN. PIsinn oSas
when the Jury. second trial gave verdict We think
5000 ihcissbOus in his favor Motion made to set Ss
II sppss the Judge tined the charged the jury that
soen IN ~ 81 In I'M, IN e..s Of insry ws valid
and Of law they should had that such an ssree
de for Defendant The jury however rssrned verdict e
stated for plaintiff Motion made to set it aside on the ground
N. Court held h., 4 . the tu{ O. Jug 70 sa S = 1s
rec, il can Be- rensdied but the Jury the Trial IA. " s
question q law concerned bound be governed By IT, ~
P 6 ss j jTe1 Ia. univ sSs ss.n the Weight
but ain the whole q the evidence new un tnefefofs
as ss S pa to have bD bot that not dseds
although this Court does rot see any reson 70 doubt ta.,
the spswer the would 10 counsel a. to the pro
pretty Of Supplying 20 smena In that particular
SUIT AGAINST RAILROAD cOsPAzr
Button sst. Hudson River Railroad Company.
Plaintiff The widow Of Button, deceased, and next
n Owe, by railroad ear and killed verdict gwen In hes
favor for sco Motion 10 made for new trsL Ins Coot
ooupSea % on psrt Of &C. not san
GENTLY definite: There must Be %. sa- Also, ns .ns
were bound % eIsreiss the utmost e,eon and han@s
care injury could have been svoded hs were sny g. ea
able neglect strict Tbs rule IL that pesons as
bound 20 use such and diligence the nature Of their en
.1 hsn as in running hroaz
night popooos city and there nsm asye been npeet.
apply. no do1b 70 son their
bu the rule hss not been spphsd wnsn the gaeon
fbere wa, .otb.r 40, on ordinances Of the city
qu 70 sry essn ign" and nys e % -.
injury individual vkstber neglect on the p.1
The person injured be set up IN detsne By the Railroad
AZ !
that ground there another case before me Co1 On "neA
the point more fully coraeA
SUIT BY DENTIST FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT.
Lounsberry az. GHbert- $50
Ioupsberry bought Of Gilbert the goodwill Of the
dentistry estsbhren q the later u isth oeer seeas
coz % sase again this city in s4id basne. for two yes.
escsps aid estsbshnsnt and f the e>nstt Of 9sslbsy
Lsss s..Gas S5sSa ,S . .. I'D S o.ens
other pisces and showed % he tn. tes, Be ns -
shsfer Greeuwchst The Jsds. in that ns shrgsd tha
psiniis only entitled 70 nominal d.,aases AID veraa
eonssr, was erroneous Plaintiff entitled At s.< 70 th-
amount received By Ar >r at the ersssamsas Of Mr.
shsfsr. New trisl granted
POINT or PRACTICE.
Lfvinsston AT. Sergeant
Question ss TO Calendar fee. The Code says where
h 10. be. 'i1 ss sS OF hs Sssa cos
where has been postponed fr cause shown - ofdcr
Where 90 posspneS Viii rr.n g for cssnas
parties revive t. The taxation Of the CLERK 10 the
PoIsr OF PRACTICE.
In the case OF Valentine, in question Of appeal
from Special to Genera Term IL has been eontended that
nG., b. within tkiTty dsys T Court h deissd that hs
power 10 extend the time bot II aid the Court Of Apps
has decided differently bat that point VIII not nov come IN
The thinks that he party hsd been thrown on his gaf
by Of The other side. Offer 20 COMPOUNDS Offs
shrzed
UNFAIR MANS AS TO JURIsDIcToS.
| Blakely axt SGnDsr
Where II 10 alleged the defendant had been 0roayh
from Phnstepha requiztion Of the Governor ermtss
indictment without good grounds AID to the pspe.
Tim within the jgrdei0n Of this Court a to esi
process on claim When he Coa discovers thai unfair nea.
have been us.d BY party bring another whis jsrscos
the party acting win be prevented from hssicf any e,sss
froua the act Court win con.de Jafss 70 nav
been obtained regards that party. II third psfucs hsrA
hsd 10 part bringing The de-adAat here svs nsmsssss
he Icing in tie Cry 70 proess sJ D. dhcf7e 90