New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-10-23
GENERAL COURr-MaRTIAL.


TIE court me, yesterday morning ard resumed the
consideration of the charges against Lieut. Horace
Ilademsn.
Council for defense asked leave TO amend slight
error In the de on pr, Saturday which
The Judge advocate offered official letter from
MAJOR spssas to sers Head in wneh be ssasd h,n.et
feld by biz superior officers The w~ received BY ,os
court.
lie said he had not originally intsncod 10 m.ks
AL, reply The defense bat IN consideration OF thu ac that
them that he should make some meats
%RI. S 81 the eS h spoon wa S:S hs a
eused his emw to zoe charge. IL appeared 70 hln hs.
wy weak, inas@Geb az they charge Ssrs,. Had
breath bs he /. poor bsssy nsbse who on the very day
thai hs mine be sprung asaoDnns uncer eeam trs
meme II Lieut. Willard OF these arch oonspr, hs
My (snd he us excuse him foe gay col played hts P
viy b,dy Lieut. whlsId charged BY 'he dS,ss1 t. ~s
the dffcson the door Ct tbs accused II such wos the
urge him inquiry, well knowing tb suci
course MY inufe his detecea. l., Ut wilHi
of re onty ed when he found thai too p, c5ntuIe
TO fan Oh NJ II tho .1penditus vey properly instituted
measures Of retrenchu ent dndas ii,
end. dd succeed som7 time IN AP last his 80
examined by the comm hdins efi and fund
correct Def,B dsnt seems to that BIS account
with Lieut. Willard running account, witch ne
might OyerPy or underpay a t' cooyeosn'e 80
that be only struck balance m the end esnnot
yisw in my .9eh light Indeed to ,,n,oI 9a';asssd
beams denying toe Jurisdiction oihe soa 'od mss
te GU
which Be sivsd ,hen he h.. paid m.e than he
ceiyed spd finally la effect denies that he aid receive .
money [Ths Judge advocate here weai into review u the
vaon. alleged sgaio tho accused bat Sustained
from any opinion whst tho charges hsi boon
proved o. not He continued Ii whsn MAJOR bak1s ssed
the accused a C his cunts there
dscepnce IN them The accused had not sd tnh h'y e All
correct replied Oh yes; have FH0 Ia h,lds, be-
the depot fund which have yaniJ ofsfed % tbs
ls."lo himself. SGf the are one 70
hist this trouble would never hsye 'cconed lie ehnsct,.
ac1eds that this frsnssct0n the re
Of careless mistake, Improbable Inc mar nsf IN
which Head gave his testimony, which, "- unshasen by
uot rigid cOssexamDstiOn, must have convinced me court
that he hs liar and set that the deeps, hal ous' 10
him appear The Witnesses who 10 Heads char
tina they would not believe him while labor
other times he spoke The truth ani
refused ~ associate with him When he Hes
Is ,sd have spos HsdemAn odd mao upon
whom he would be royenged this defense shows nat he IL
under drink and did not bDow what DO s
In reference the testimony IL Capt Van Pet the Judge al
yoc ate ended that he had shown that Heal thu
habit e. tuJ5s poIh and CtheI PROVISION. non tns 1o1s
that he houd order Capt Van Pet o. rattan N -
bsIIss pork the trouble OF rolling them 20
tie cOumsary store house aud fen5 dosn two 81 bis O~a
In their when he could esy turn two OF bs Own
into the In reference b the issuing Of
fresh beef from the sode supplies 10 the Ocsrs tbs est
that could be IL that the accused knowing THAI such vs.
the abuse and cOec ed a0d appo
the tbs sale 70 tbs depo nnd hs did not this
only hs cInDaty Ihs shove - ony Dnef
he sdyocites reply In concnon he said NOW,
bsye done with TINS defence bsFe not re-
viewed IL thoronshy IL not Intention q 90 d.
Tbs object Of this reply tsgch - ~ was 10 snde,s
two II nv from the inpuisions thrown
In cOnCusiOD that the management Of
hes been lsboiious sod psiSfa duty 70 w.W
dered perform H. sad bsye endeyOrsd 20 obey the order
The council Tor defense asked leave ~ make short
reply The court allowed Il eohd thai the rspY be
~hDs and the soO ned to eleven O'clock
d.y for that purIose