The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1855-12-14

points The right Of Denmark % levy he SQUAD dues
tS us as 'qa ee es o s Sy
= 1Ne -sD. ~. oh fST 7ss Broadway.
MASON BROTHERS. REPLY TO TIE TRIBUNE
persons. sei upon Us % We We claimed the n b
ply in is eoamns abe editor Of he Tribune refused per
ten anss we wou sn ssowas paesq
a e. % no
ss s an on Of ns DE % n s
agaipst u.s. desire 70 repe First ii
sS q 81 % s
ss, other oa ais ma |. al intended against shs Iouns
stieisms are 10 respect liable to the charge intentional
We refused 70 gn this document, thu ground that
nav yns eTopgn any shgs s o. tysns assns se Tribune
such ss, % answer IL psso ns
TO- oar ass N "a
10 oes sr bringing II s
isrs the public.
Without any provocAion part as New Yorh Tribune
ars fsSs,s ca
sy gesiodc. poSshed BY and s organ o. the New
e Newspaper press in which The eharse was brough, Ina.
BROUGHT directly indirectly Intended again. any psre.
regard hrs charse ITSELF whcn no right o
pss,.1. AssssasSn IL rssuls.y
request even me sItele IN Question written ana publish
made ~ l sa
ed: :Sdr sps s r by 1c r.
sdofisi eo@mss q he faSiSsrs crrasr tSa s, y bss
s sass
ss Of se q The
their author + NJ. Mason Of he house o. Mason Boh
annhaess journals we DO not KNOW
A. sGs - ss ss
say that that house have repesied 81
sssn r.psa,say dsspponies sSvsras Ss.
fay
reviews than their intrinsic merits woud justify. home Of
manifested Al q ,hsp have very likely eonlr6uIea 9 hs
New York pres In general
reply to this asert ,ha, neither persons
columns Of he Tribune for purposes endeavored
re OF nny roSce o. one o.
his cur he g es Ss
appear he We have psd TSaos
yet We have never esd that hs gave US any rsn q sn
iayort whaever nor have we .ssd any iayos In coDse
per gave the righ TO The advertiser claim parAy
in which have been advertising extensively years Tor
PrSo vs have arays acted In so. win s
press honshon The country advertisers have recev
treated win honor and courtesy i viii bear US witness.
thai We have never acted pon the principle I'D
HAVING thus specifically answered Inc specific change Inc
No petty tsrsSy more oaoas and aontempse than TIA.
., 'ns press An attack ny newspaper upon private ind
strong armed man upon who is unarmed and feeble
cation with the public nj hts eommandhe editor attacks
destitute OF these important advantages.
Tie attacked shfnks public
sion Of his and motives though
all respects Innocent After be ba this
beae dragged before pubc attempts
de- end hum he fe9uedo pay much per line r h1;pr
yere
nifty 10 answer IN lhe medium winch contained e
though he offered pay for e. submit
an arbitrary condition.. Common justice
Newspaper editor " vested.
II Is well hal tho generally admits mproprs,y of
such attacks upon private Individuals that editors NOT
otter found who sufficiently destitute honorable feelings
u indulge In them.
We distinctly deny
That we have any knowledge of any sweeping charge
Of yebaiy And corruption agns& he leading Nav YORK
nails In the mater reviews OF books made By the
Publishers Cirrularn
That ether OF hrn, Authorized of
has ever made repeated efforts 20 CONTROL u, columns q the
tribune.
the Tribune OF any Other paper because has refused be
any matter controlled by uG.
That either has such bad opin
on as Il alleged BY The Trb gaip The mot obscure
uninnueDua New York press GENERAL In particular.
MASON BRopaERs q Park rev kax York