New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-09-21
LtW INTELLIGENCE


N'-i,A go an sn,unt )oS'~i 81 tcNsniCi
x,s, ~ iHue iS'< 81 sT,~ eH'. '' g. 81. -. -
Al -. .Asvs - re- 1904 "a lao p, !, - :,
a.. 80 ~ vAsca. 81 : N.los~i. ~as &; he ;1se a.
80 >s,re,ci TIA. BE han wSs u,s.ic. sul .ha no
,.orS.s.ssv~ ~crv ~ .hc tauigon; issse y; VI hvN
yANA 49, S,rcs,y c<0o voec~>d N.', ttSi TIE ga D.
- ~ -,..vs,l,- r,t kur sAcrSs~i - DC a4.o raj
A. ,r.y,fes c ,i>A W. - hNaks. view TotusHt - ne
cNuapst,. ~ 10 krovc& IA 4 ANd oNn i'a@dai,niF
rsxt,s =, NJ. MO Ire ca-;lncAios en- sine1 ~
N, C,,,-ro Schu,icT - rNs,ien' sd Mr.. h,le -
500 a. "a ~ g.. - ~ NJ ~ e. ss cSuef DO
gr- ~ lvSNcf,siae ~ uas ~ 80 81 attorney ~
% =, - -,.ss "a ., sitss5 ths' 80 Company . s
,s Ssza Ns - Z ~ ~ = 80 a7AS az t..a,.ei
49, s.-fs..S 81 - rre.ii.yi s,irs 70 NJ Hye c-r
sss,s,, :. ,,l ,sa,. 10 htsk esAa.as sl - cen e.
ssss, ~ isuH- q ise Cs-'rsay j. .at' =.
- s-,, :, AZ = - e>er L rs before fhs pei su,
In Ssses,s scvtc ic thsi Se ~as nes seao~ OF se
Ky = rsl,.ssA:es sY.t ~ hu 70 b.eWn vol w's2a
s al SAN g y 60 - = taf . X. oS1 70 sef ,
,esS ;, ~ Heez ssa Secretary "s' . 'r5'e' a0' -
n. zsnss, Is vas .iiS - us.A ~ Kys osslaea ;he ,s
rsfE4s = me Frs,aSc1' a. tAs e. o. The Con2sIy
E-vySist ;A,i ia. f-s sos1 3 IAte nee's oot 2 VIZ
is Ssv ,haf 1870. 1a3 ecoct thv PeS ieo' I'd 2.
CzEt q NJ NJ " g ~ 9ll 81 - - r., .5
NJ I'VE - 81 Iu IS Secretary huse iha' bIoieis
a. aes ~ pe- would rc 'zlsef hs L'X day to- va.
n n :ly "a ztSs ss ldtrSls Immediately 70 the par
e. a. n1 c,rtca;es = - ;he ss-sture OF ne RE
49,. v
NJ. ave L-e Aeree - opportunity y; ''aDt '1s ''--N
tsc>k ..,,. r-,.t.5,s,,
n the emp yueni o Tie company as u9aeSleik "a. = 80
ts,y o- twelve year tbs h sy nsd oesn ~ sls
Irsed <2jto hs, The ooy eA estate hs o%nsd
ihee aouse "a OF . i,s. woe acc - o. " ~
bed hui 1850 having ScuEh the lot and paa %lCVoh
~s. ,,ed ikst he de money in addiJn % his salary
BY bavs TIE cypress 20 convey baggage OF passengers o. A
M Fdwud stanton testified 70 BEING broker; hs rars
setrs with Nj Kyle previous 20 heHins OF ta1c IN onyne
~ he av6 the ok transaction, Of Mr. Kyle smounie ed 20
sboul $50 CeC DO Re wss man OF properly .;
vas Re nsde 1rey out Of the Express supposed
60 nan be able 70 c0umaLd money 10 MAKE fanssC
lions 10 such amount have made oan5 to hin a; aIe As
u .cIsd as soleI % ST. Kys the puch.es my
own without naming any prn;Psi the m'oIY Of hs
ubDsaonoIs on time 80
,,S. IL XIV Iept an account hes Deposited
imse coy. SO CO.. son~'ines less ard sometimes more
GsT San ford uns for The Company moved nonst,
IN ~. y,upd that plaintiffs igen n making The loan
wihou, uquyi the, there sunory FOR issuing the
,hst tie certificates were oIgey-end other p'ns
TIE Judge refa,d the noaait lie allegation O. negligence
Gen then supnmei Nd lie conteDded that the duty
of psnHs INQUIRED the office Of the Com oany before
st sD6 the the Company in Hanover JOS, round
the correr ava would have been very trouble for hem
NAB tn, inquiry that they must b'ye known Mr. Rye was
hut young clerk Iec iviog nothing but his salary yet
md coad enab ed him rghy TO be
pos SEED Of Gen. ). ccntended that Jues shonid OoH
eneursse conceal such thinehey gettn more than 10
BY tue oontrecsnd in the event OF an agent beng
families 10 me principal the has opportunity If sser-
tapins regsd 1t. On the other band, den conended
that there sgeuce on the part OF he company M
KYLE bad be. for time In their employment and had
nlwsy acted well sustained GOOD chhecter to that lime
Ali the property be possessed was house and lot on when ne
had pd 81 600 which lie could essy BY prudence have saved
om bs alaryhe property beng moaaeo ioT me D4ithce'
In spect the bank certificates there was 10 negligence IN
them with him having hai Tgh 70 sup
pose from the Of lhfer thai they would have been
thus fuinsh gauIe IN blank for aqf5 Of stock and
shSss ID. asnhat an Bslk in his City ;efheltss
transfer OF State stock thus signed Gen D eontended thai
the verdict ILoud be for defendants -
Mr. A. H. Smith for plaintiff then addressed the Jury: De
coDtended that there no negligence on the part OF panh
thai these precisely SIMILAR TO al that were
su.o % . m S,ns be onv nice Al VIII c thew could
have wood have been done at the Fapter once IN
Hanover where hey W. ud on have been aoe 70 see nj
Kyle hims u President, Nh scIuyer hsVns bis Office IN
.other Of the President and cfeay
being guay attached 10 the rthcate they were not re-
1ee the only other hs office in rryJnIow snd
would no fr the plaintiffs 70 go there snd n99Fe
Of the conductors OF other per ons tnelgea ~neheI W nov W.
Kyle acting properly IN tIa.sie' Tine SO lhey hsi
employment the company ana as toAen OF ls 80
ItoeIty raised his saaiy that he was properly ecng as
as has teen ssed have made good deal Of money by
the Fxpes gentlemen are bnown TO we me1e themselves
independently wealthy by The business Gen Sadofo as o.
ready said thai the press Of Mr. NJ was only to deliver
Or tie oEer hand, Mr. Smith cou;tnded that there
negligence part the Company The fact pronioen
A. ,bs SserosnS Of 8ss GO in single dsythat bey
aware occupying house in the vicinity of o,dTy aud
Ehav pa tn City u which Pe sons remove for the
purpose Of high expensive sly 500 they mn.t
have he could not have paid the interest OF his
and i've on any thing like the amount Of HE salary lGen'
SANFORD make M. pucha'ed the property when
cost fy much than such property does a. present MY
smith i.nded that The money been loaned In good faith
ON the regular certificates If the COMPANY and any person IL
suffer he loss should be the Company and not innocent
thiro parties
The Judge in bis charge said that plaintiffs do not
claim could they In my Judgment lain the stock
itself the Company could not ac issue H. me stoc osn
full and of an ss@n. could nti o1 tnai on te Ger
teas the Company rsuduleDty issued by ls agent he
pAit induced 20 loan money aud tGey AK 10 ave
only by President but by the ansfer Agest whom Il
scinow Mr.. Ky ewSs IL eens- commended inai
the agent not Authorized ey the company 70 ISSUE ms
he did wrunstny, the Company ~ not bound y
It. and thai agent soe beyond he inrecons OF ms pm
but he II agent does &C; VII ca appears to
third to be within the rule OF his power the principal
In regard the signature OF the President Is no excuse
certificates signed blank and eft with the Sec
The thar both officers shall su the GER
fsies the object being thar they shall be each
il is the duty OF the President before signing GER
fese to that IL properly hled snd comPeed-ard
n regard TO the Transfer Clerk.
plsinfs making inquiry 70 The eerthes'es
showing evidence vi having been Issued by the authorized Off
sufficient ane third parties had nsh 20 take them a.
the certificates OF the Company
referred the test ouy IN the case and con-
stred that nothing had been shown bai was for th jury
the idea that there had oecd neg
the part of plaintiffs by which preclude recovery and Il
60 they entitled TO verdict for the amount they had sd'
The jury amer Gu absence Of retained
ot in favor Of plaintiffs for 81 oS, beng principal AM N
tsrest
SUPREME COURT-GEAEEAL TgRN-sLer. D-BeioSs
Judges MITCHELL. RoosfvELT, aud MONKS.
the the application Jsns.s Chu Tob 10
siX,ynnthsi near Third ay, ioI permission 70 convey
certain church Properly.
Tritity Church 10 NJ. James 4