New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-11-17


- ~ ssss ~ Iisn, Ass Ne 49,
- -sss ssss ets ksssreS sslisfs. saa shsf ywu
- ~ 10 safs SOL s.nf h. ne bsns soa 81 ne
60 sus.lles deliaf A. | ss,a s~ofe hA' 70 az
u p,s 70. DOT swosf belors ffsni isY tha 700
- fsffo kiuar n tiufk in n morainf Nhea
yes .,fiis uls hana a. There mua b. soue mis-
kAs
q DA yos as' '-s" The A. II ! did v"
ssstsks
IOss,,,on repeated and same answer.
q. Gao yos rem eusbeF one vAy or he other A.
a. DOT spov I Odd not Sk Siuan for a recsipt.
asst ssppa.e he sou have given One Il | had
had sos6denoe in him then A. the tine ! handed
Jsgc Stuart The money did not suspect HIN Of beng
tehy; don't recollot Of eyeT ssearng that did ~
suspect HIM. I have no confidence In any one and
oough' =; he time Jadge stuart should have give
. receipt, but thea again looked 81 !, In ths lgh',
thai perhape he AFRAID something would come out
called 70 &c Stuart Thursday night after paying the
meDey, ! Go not think | vent on Friday or MO8dsy
night but went on Saturday light ! am mistaken,
wss there on Friday night; this paper and tAls To-
d1ssment was written by Stuart on Saturday night,
FEB. III think did not swear before the grand jury
that I received this paper the day II bears date,
might have said 90, but did get them the 18th Of
the month; / am DOT positive whether swOre in the
grsnc Jury room that the letter which | recsved at
Philadelphia for Sarded by my brother was 10 StuarFs
Handwriting; / think ] swOne II was not; j msy
have sworn that thought my husband destroyed 1T
be did destroy II in my presence; the first one hun
dred dollars was given me by Stuart to operate upoo
Carr TO get him away, and be told me to be sure and
see him the next day; Stuart said he would give me
q hunsred dollars month and then If wac mind
10 give hun nice gold watch and chain, would be
al right; when Carr | thought he did not seem
70 want 10 persec ute my husband; asked him If fifty
dolIsrs would be any object 10 leave; he refused to
take The money; / wOult gladly have given u TO him
" be would have accepted II; | missed seeing Stuart
one day between 18th July and when he was taken
sob do no, recollect Of any longer time ban that
do not see him.
O Who called on you in Berlin and asked you to
come with ConnIyo A. decline answering.
q. Was IL lot Burtis a. / decline 10 answer.
y. Who first called you about the matter In Bos-
ton :. A. Mr.. ard Nrs. Burtis ca ne on with me.
q. bid any body ask you to come on from Boston
A. hse promised M Stuart 10 come on the first o!
The month.
fOusstion repeated A. Not to my knowledge.
q. Did you receive any letter about 1t NO an
Ewer.)
(Quesion repeated Witness-From whom
Counsel From anybody, about that matter. Wit
ness. received letters from my relatives there was
no letter received in Boeton relative 10 my coming
q. Did Connolly receive letter A. Tpst do
not know.
Q. Did you see any letter in Connoly's possession
about your coming on TO New York A. / received
letters from my sister.
q. From nybooy else in the city OF New.York be.
SIDE hp. Fish A. don't remember; | came to
New York, and was sent for to 90 TO Mr.. Smiths
office; Dir. Burs came 10 NE, on tue corner of Watt
and Varick streets, at a family named More; had
then no notion what was going TO the Recorders
Office for; Burtis said il would do harm to hear
Smiths and Halls conversation, that / need not say
anything myself; think Mr.. Hal sent for me.
q. Did you not receive letter stating tla: if you
come and testify against Stuart, Fish and Albert Bur
lis would be released from prOsec alton in hassschu
retts A. never received any such letter. saw Mr.
Smith and Mr.. Hall In a room 10 Smiths office, and
Mr.. Hall said TO "You called on me, Mrs. Con
"Doly, last Summer aud he.asked by whom was
cont there's he then sad You recollect the tins you
"cslled at my Office, you said you were ssnt by
"a gentleman % | said Yes" he then asked
who the gentleman was | declined to answer;
he said Il l would answer such questions as
would be put me before the grand Jury and
state the truth and nothing but the truth, he would
not have my husband tried on that indictment; this
was on the I'd day of October; Mr.. Smith did not
Bko make this promise; were there but short
time; Mr.. Burtis went with me when left; DONE
think were there half an hour; it mi ht have
been fifteen or twenty minutes; Burs did not go with
TO Boston; the next evening returned to the city
with my husband; Burts met us at the depot and we
three went to Mr. Halls house
The court then adjourned, to meet at 10 o'clock on
Monday.