Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1855-12-14

,,,. ,,.,,
nnii from The dime they ara made .,.
- ,'ie b; what authority II h. PAID:
. ~ ~ - I.'.-tr, wv lN'n''Tcditl Ter L.. 'esu
NJ ii,,, ;,r.,,,,.., IS.
riE,n r, nj r' - "L"i"s MI n;,;,r,r,r;,,,,.
cor"i%,p The b.; Bend o. the y Hrsig liz Jnckso:
e". Et:"r"I I" Committee ON E"s ,,e hHnawha Xiv
NJ. h"bh, presented tn. relnons,,s nc.
.'h ~ 'ht citizens ct Chesterfield ami, n por
,.c noun Inspector Of Petersburg 10 ins.e "!o"ns
rle.' :'.''' IN sad county. Mr. Hnsp> iH'OT q,
t.ri. On t .,.' o. INC county cont Of Chr
BILLS PASSED.
The following bill, were read a ,Lir, =;
passe,!: '''" "n!c a.
ABA. to- separate the town of We,Isbur,
r.Sdus nj l;ronkc county in r,.ln;ion ,n * from Il,
o. It's poor and To am-ui the Charter ~ :" 'te sep,a
y bill incorporating the Nr"iuin Scy;"' 90! 9FG9
IL city OF Richmond. \ bill! ,n in,,,r,,' bank (,
'un Agricultural Institute :, bin g., as lie Lo.
ota'oi II ntAts al appropriation Of - ; USC ::
Luuaic Asylum. 10 tie Ess.r
~, -. REPAIRS oS @ovkR>oR'> Hu.z
Inc pm authorizing. repairs to b. mai.
i''"S'' ht" :" provide: furvi,u-s '"e IT,
'Ir ga tne table Oh is third realm, '-r'-C,
"a '' ''L,'' IL p"r"n ben. absent. - '" '-'!9s
,r BILLS On >ICuND KE,uIIc
OH ah'""izIn" Si"ge Just;c. ~ emil,
An""ir.Sifrii' .: married WOMEN 'A' '~e &C.
M '''AkfF, before III" question ,ror;
',;' as pu'' "Xirr,scG .!rsi:e 10 hear . give
niaraI upon HE merits of his bill. Wiou, sou
p Wo ~ would move - lay it ol ;L. ,si4 e
h. az Sd'+" INA" TIC PROVISIONS yr,,,.,f,
cH e'grai'"d rg"H tL" law Il, hi, ',~S'"@
e'sn'' l" :a" til" whole INV Iiar,pnri,, a. De-
La' !"irr, ;woJu>i!re> ~! tho P,or. 'e''
"'''sHiert d! u married woman viii ,Ia. nm. >'
M 'n,r, = n"'hy Public, and others hclp, ds,s,
Tie officer 81 rb, man 'AHt Of JU,r. OF the Peace
single Justice that Is NOW suinyS H''c power 10
lie ana clerks 81 courts. We nil kno,. ,! No'
mehts executed before singh. Jus,ir. ,r ". r'.s'
A. SO lar rs the ends "f u.tcr snG the nrevom,;N
ABUSES are concerned, Is executed bcfDr. ,wn 80,
NC an h"' 80" ':'c Necessity .: requiring the ore.cn
"i more t!an "m" 10 take hckuJw,ri ,u,.r.. -, &C.,;
c!iaracie! when that power IS conferred r,,, '"''
''es ehd SieFhs =" courts. lie Tel; as-ur,t ,hs, ,S
Pl'h proposed by the bill would D. all sufficient ~
'nc "cc"hii-hinrt ri ia" U.i.c;. cDntr,n,,a,.L IL
me of!1hH! hl. lie remarked as 10 The da;cu,,v ~
Sr'uS WoJ"'t!c-r together al all times when Ju,y
"i ms -"It "a. I" Dc i,ytrm,t
Mr.. HAhNErt SAID the Gr-Up6ut, NJ .l,c cs,,,.,o,
convinced lila that the Cod" j. r.ht H. II s,spd and
tllht, ST. Tar from granting his rrivii,rs n .rl
Justice the proper bill 10 r"2or; for ,hs ,,fsn
OF the Code would be-, hl 10 proh,Si Sn,rr, f.o.,
taxing these acknowledgements. Iii. friend was rnSs.
;Gkrn when he laid Their" provision III the Code
authorizing The CLERKS of Cours - take tho scknv~.
!rl.mcn:s al married wumuE.
III. kkNfEK said he was righ: III saying tha, IL,
power was conferred Ipua c!trks
Nj. GAHNETT ss!d he Was in error. lie made HI:
statement uon III. Representation vi lis friend 20 n.
right, t!lr>Nirii u: hua"hg,I understanding :bs
Code carefully. Eurvvn though this j, 20, ii. clerk
Is an officer appointed o. lie vote Q: tie whole
,ouhtv, a'rI necessarily reliable, lille q Justice is
'hoscn merely upon the vote Of Il comparatively
'nnll district. .ts 10 the dticuity OF geiius two
uaiccs together, he Wo"I. ak, who ever heard ii
h" year 1862 Was no, :nu CONVEYANCE of real e,.
al" q common ,h!ns. and IRE not our records tr:
WITH GccCs O: t.!s character IL. thOc..ht thai to
Mi atln Of The Old law reaag!us two Justices 10 L.
present ~ these acnowit sG.ens, the icast &c.
snrIly that they coud throw around the rights OF
married woGcn. IL may De- that Iat security Is
aI!Hc0rs Ole; but Is there any reason why they
should make !. less, and the whole theory OF the
law t.. 10 tie rights % the wife 10 the estate, 10 be
uceI 10 ut!:!.,s! Way no; II, s,gi the deed, II
his U%irdgIrnt before Justice I've vi no avail
Why NO; ict he! ssu il without any justice a. a sEd
reduce the character Of q conveyance TO s!na.o
execution q: Ter title apart from the securities con-.
.elnpIsted By the lawl Tic could not support the bill
ana VOID, therefore, renew his motion 10 lay ITO:
toe table
The vote upon Til. motion having been taken, IL
suited ayes 81, noes 10. So the motion was ~
agreed 10.
Mr.. Powell offered the following Amendment Z
he bill! which at:er brief discussion, was rejected
in the prescrcc of two competent witnesses. in no
sir" connected VIII, or related 10 the grantee OF said
ecd."
Mr. GARRETT proposed TO amend, by striking out
he words "or by So,ary Public within tho United
states" This amcu!mrmt was also jnc,ed.
On motion Of Mr. KEMPER, clause was inserted
rderirg thar the bill 60 into operation the lstof)ay
Iext. Tie question ordering the bill 10 h- Ell.
.ros-cd and read n third time, was put and Garfield
The same ec;;nn as h"i upon the following bills
h for the Incorporation o! ~" Farnviilv Town
Ia Company; Il bill 10 amend the charter q! ths
.uuncun ana Berlin Turnpike Company; and a bil!
o iuccrpora. the Ferguson Shop aid Gshs MI.
Turnpike Company.
On motion OF W. GEORGE, the House adjourned.