The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1855-12-05

Meeting az the stockhoIders-The schuyler
sock ssiI Repadiatcd.

Meeting ~ the ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Schuyler
sock Ssiu Repadiatcd.
The stockholders Of the New Haven Railroad Company
met yesterday in the city Of New Haven, Conn, whom
thsre was present good representation Of the stock
The meeting cal ed to order at by Mr. Justus r.
Buckley President of the road, who took the chair.
wm CuRTs NoYss Esq, the counsel Of the Company,
being called on made explanation to the state of the
litigation 10 which the Company Is immerged. He
marked that when the meeting held last May there
had been some five six suits commenced. Al that
time be stated the condition Of that litigation They
were the of Ferris Brother for $23 900 of that
stock, Dyckers g. Alstyne for $4,000 G. Vanderbilt
for $780, COO that of BelImcns for $4,000, and two
aotons Of the Mechanics Bank for transactions with
Schuyler Of $4,000 or SIS 600, and one COR about
$4,000 There were the only suits commenced
at time, and these all at Issue and ready
be tried, kept Ia the of the Mechanics Bank.
One these the stockholders aware has been IA
citated both sides with all the rapidly that could
possibly given to It, until wi hia three months. It
has been arguec in the superior Court aud decision
sgsprt the mpspy tie Court holding the COM
pany responsbe for the Of Mr. Schuyler
company The Court consisted Of nve Idge tn 60 CON
CURED in the oni OF mich he spoke. The Chief JUS
t,cs had dub, bat ultimately concurred in The
Judgment. Judge tanpb held Tn tho company Is
liable The was taken Immediately to the Court Of
Appeals and in order that it might be disposed OF in the
u
change il for a case earlier on Vie calendar.
He presented the fioairg report, containing the
Correspondence relative TO .has endeavor:-
To THE STOCKHOLDERS THE New ORR New HAVEN
s cs sr q dc .
H. Easr o S qa sc
70 soekhoids for Ser oondssaoa Ike oowlas sor
ss @ ws ss s. VIII s ~ s sss
the counsel Of the compare 70 procure DECISION In he
az PIN s a Gh 1s &
Own IS 70 the cause Hf A s " or ss
che Asnss This aud AL iaarned you 4ta of
by ssSs SPEEDY lsas .S.. S.ss hey
Ss % % rsm o e.
Esq prss e M ss ssa es .ssss
SAY a. sG ss 20
The iseiiiy your conpas Tor me raudnleat ue OF sock
peas the earliest possible moment about
%
ofhe stookho der at New Haven and he day
M VERY on wa 10 % s Mn
doubtedy be chs At The ensuing terra Of the Court q
consent q The parties IN oo TO accomplish TINS al
Of H. whose
ade on he A day Of June IT., ane from which we had ap
r'"''1 io'' = No 50 ,yAiI 81, sept 8, 1856
r. S.VA u,
DEAR srs-My chen !, na New York and New Haven Rail
od % q ne SSse psna
year or more must ap before can BE- reached on The
dusas
which commences towards the close this mont under he
n1ses1s ss I so.s :
The desis Of ii parties for spsrd Decision will trust In
daoe and your clients % consent 70 ibis arr .nsement
necessary rIepsIaea ior Ne arsamsps ,r,r,, ,ovr,
TO this Mr. Van Wrinkle replied follows:-
%a & so1f; ESQ exchange xsss s sass
" <. B. 70 With one Of earlier day, and then
would s.ssssd you 9:
s ,snr a Ss me s sy n saying At su er
he l4S sepcmber addressed TO Mr.. Van VInkie the
ssTs 81 IL
Court Of Appeals of which hope echsuge Tor
returned determine 20 lively now ;
seryec having been delayed In some changes in
wR s.s other sy 'sa
s coo :. rs s ssso S A.
Ram ain 80 STOOD No SO 90 he
more ,hsn year Mr. judah referred 10 10 nv note Of
ne Oh septe@bs, and VIVA whom enseced . make
S return ans IN allow G me make an
and opened negotiation for hat purpose ssanins
n s Ms var Wrks .e % , at hs &c, Sy s N
our case With % get heard after th'
HIN .E.n Il 20 4. y n y
was counsel, aud to ahcb u H. seden k,q o. Monro
county opposed me) had been down FOR the 9th
sr1snsfme aS ~ Mr. S's sen sxeSsnss
then
ssss ne rye me whsS irS dc than one com
the rule Sqsh % q Of - much b. moment
procure rela.snon o The rule % prA 70 couns
5 made s ID Ky u ad as
currsnce o. p Lord E.a who vas me- Van
Van while iasrs before / len sIlsoaSn 10 vas Q
S s. and . e h sa
On de dc sS:qss tassdas u, week trom ii
mas.ey rsd New York; and continued my
seideus residence procure consen, erchsns
from him until tcioaer 8, when addressed to Mr. Va
No;SowA1sr, oe. s. 1855.
standing a 70 and which - dowo Tor Tuesday
n sns % you A., s e. me 0S
"o' A''e' '''' 'p''''-''A ' WIN cuarIs MOVES
On sAs ss1 as received the ,oie~ins reply: -.
brsa s% Only received your favor .ss nsss D
@ s ssS Ct sa ~ I'D s' s r
yesterday .aa h.i Is could not argue a. term
e l. o.
d'''er'''y on Saturday i s"Ss 'lE VAN w,sxtn
Upon she receipt ol this directed my partner. NJ Ia
madge 10 offer 10 Mr. Var Wink the with
one counsel q side than have the
abb n was declined. the day, a to
ven Wsnkle the ielo wing letter;
No. 80 WALL ST Oct 8, 1855.
T. & vAk wIrKIx Esq.-
MY Dian Sh:-I SURPRISED and disapf o,ned the
tents expected TO the this
You have already sived oral propo
ton 10 by counsel or side and uoderstar
from N, Tanadge declined In order 10 have heard u
term propose Albany, on Monday, and got u
d. ferre6 IN Thursday Friday, when, presume
Lord will viii You this and argue
theIi When saw Mr. l. At Albany, on Tuesday last atty
having made the motion 10 permit two counsel side 10
heard at which hs preent) and which granted
desire him mention the fact to yon your arrival whit
expec ed that morning, aud that should be ,dy
Tuesday of week for which day the txchange
for down. and he said he would do pre-
course, you informed Of these facts.
Let me hear from 10 the mode Of getting hear
today Yours truly, WM CURTIS MOVES
The following his reply, which closed tbs correspond
ence--
W. q MOVES. Esa- New YoRx, Oct 9, 1855
DEAR SrR-I regret, probably more than you do my II
ability your proposition In the New Haven
M Lord will, understand. be IN town on Monday and