New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-11-24
surEsIos couRr-yoy = -s.6r. J.as. oAkr''.


4
J.oeb Lsss .st Gr-s.ey HeEir>A
To recover dsmsge- 'o- alleged libel Ia pubsAiG Z
se % owirs Psssrsph sh Feb 1885 aadsr ne'd u G.
W. le.rn ,hss ,p>r,on named I.eos L-~s Va 70 rOias
,ut Cty soliciting I'd -trs-mess for sons Of car eSsra
DO .ie, means sNLios erd esasaeat inform ta
per,ons tom be ssstrs rHs rEssss On h- v,fs' Of
vh.-.k advertise ie onser souf 50 "a
mon,y lss Thi. m,ds vita air II kns~lsdrs
ard sA detailed shat eAeu'std in
AWAY in .om. instances -hleh has Cons % "a
ef u. M Lew u.Tb 70 .sas "a. Trsd:- ,s,, DC -.
hIs tin IN most Pross- eSsdiSa Let 81 tnose
vto ma, te-eaf anything % d. ~s tks tnvidaa M
SoS ,b 5srmsiin Of cur r,sss ". .ss-I .s.t.
meet tro1 our o,s .e>s; Bsane- r>esi0s. for -ees
Feb i. 500 Is Proht f5r the - s's Os''
Plan Il cad A, be ntee ." az iu' ard tn, as 'h'
sctei bad bee jaes, &c. he slsi nst sln~e DANCES
In .v-rrvd ,be Psis1s s,d gone ass'
.oies .f'sr,n rent, othst ssp-r. .oe ,.iss .s
ave t-ou,.po dsl, .nd he sent weesy snd
w-e,ly cires huaued sevsety taoG.
'nd ant TIE, denied h. Nsta By The puo iesa asa
Ne,us. 3 oous6sa Ani an arsh.m for defense.
MI G1.h,n eoHeleed ,hs; b. psoe ,Oo s..nt e'ea al
ever init th't b.Ors s. he bad nsat to .s3" bat
plant al been insrse IN ms bus nes' relations sad 70 h
tAeri Ala on this sroa1d tbs Cssr' saaed him the .sf-
Awe ,,.,.
sta ed th't they hsd 5000 up.usd Mr. lie 'i'
TssUst Ofsee. snd M >r,beish IN tbs paelc,
hGu,v-r b, Up stairs. to Nj Dns, ons OF e etot
-bo ref sed 10 ierset t-"s" aesed' toi p'nsnu 'hN
tisrt dunn.
or tie part 'd-fsass 81 that psntt the stsrs
kesc. Ely Surter Botcvsy. wh-rs he n'd been ths
hsbit u cal slci' sts-d posv ly that
The culs,u Of THs rssrsr va buE Is o. day .'d 'poks
o;herrHe e business amer t'atius to de
psrsse ths gentleman Of ne ghes. Silly,
ho store IN Broadway nd ad'sruses in rHs cntsUss,
pTts, the 'on e>e - tbs TsIBuSs
ard 70 De- ,ho. that Me..s Nee hid heard Of p,a
h having spoken elsewhere hu the testimony ~" not con
nd red bv he C. ut % be gwen VS. leo shoEa
bS the Of Mr. Stbesh hat te offered pa1eh
sdicdon for Tlsmtf ssi~d BY h'm'M IL va tI'o
.bo.a ~ NJ Richards Of the printing pres room 'hst
thu ccu .ou ofIHE DAILY rRrBuSs Nt1s ume, 5000
COPIES sDd thai h- insst ~ sous doSu.
hsc Re, stated sut continued se-rwAt 70 tneiess-
The cpe was adv up by the respec I've counsel
The Cont, ia It's ehsrse review he -suTonf ~stH
TER testimony. h,t Artie ,rect Il 50,
the for de- ants The Court, however,
the Alleged than
had sp.d rstsetion, II IN Ntcl 10 not coz
ue,l, o publish OF parry. The jury viii coo
det whether not snc aso - u the .tn'hoNinn
tfthe of the sel whether tney Bt5ud"d to refer
70 the alleged be consdersd sPpsd
qu.rse bcur verdict f'vor of pl,iaf tor
sac
INSURANCE. OF BUILDING ~ NASSAU STREET
Sheldon Assignee Of Lsmport AT The Bsekms1 FIRE Ia
mrsncs { Bpsny
Messrs Lauport Co keep DO Ikatore IN one or
large djui1ns the BAH Soon str "a
in an erplos OF s. plae monias oh ch set ns 10
q tpward OF 81, 30 Thsy vers insured AZ the beeans
oace hcb isu,ed psy Tee cl. Ss assigned to aln
IN sne abr. The point of feuso 10 IN import ant
the bull ing siheld b. the broker on efec ING
olslIu H. Me.ua Hoyes ssd EdsG. For defendant Me'1s
c arb ard Rese.