Gallipolis journal. [volume] (Gallipolis, Ohio) 1837-1919, 1855-09-13

4 i
fore Last stated that the Gallipolis Jourps
would Be attended 10 the following week, bu
as we have not received copy Of the last il
sue, we cannot tell whether We have been "a:
tended tor OF not. We shall have to shea
our wooIly friend If he plays that game on us
l-GaHipohs Jour.
|. This Il the most coutenptible dodge yei
Being unable to reply to our article, he pre-
tends that he has not received apaper con
tanning il. He must excuse rs for saying tha
we believe the above ezcEss to be q lie mad
cut of whole cloth. We remember distinctly
having mailed trDo copies Of the Telegraph
Icontaining our reply, in two separate wrap
ipers, directed to the Gallipelis Journal, one O
which was sent to the Postofiee on Monday
night. and the other on Tuesdsy. Oul
reason for mailing two was that the one mailed
Monday night had been worked off before the
proof was corrected, and we wished Mr.. Har,
per to rereive corrected copy. We believe he
received them both. If not, it is the first fail
ure of the kind we have heard of from that
quarter. We have no hesitation in suspecting
Mr.. Harper Of falsehood, whenever 1t suits
his purpose. An editor who VIII charge Mr.
Chase with writing that Buffalo Abolition res
olution, at this late day, will publish any
thing else which may temporarily, suit his
I
| falsity. We shall take the pains to send Mr..
Hsrper three papers this week, and see if he
can succeed in getting one.-Meigs. Co. Tel.
The woolly dog who penned the
above is SO accustomed to misrepresent
we believe he scarcely knows when he
is guilty of falsehood. The week in
question, we had J. L. Vance in our
employ, who passed the post-o Office four
times day, upon whom we depended
to bring our mail matter, and in conse-
quence had no occasion, and were
not at the post-ofice during that week.
He is willing to be qualified that no
Telegraph was received that week for
the Journal-that he took from the Office
the papers that came by the Marietta
mail for the journal and remarked at
the time that it was strange no Tele-
graph was received. We place more
reliance in young Vance's word than
we can repose in Thompson, the woolly
editor of the Telegraph, for he is per-
fectly disinterested in the matter. We
again state that we received no Telegraph
of the week in question, and for the
truthfulness of this assertion we can
sdduce abundant proof, nor have we
since received copy of that week.
We believe Thompson withheld his pa
per from US in order to end controver-
sy in which he was becoming badly
used up, and to do SO e6ectually has
resorted to contemplate lie, and we
don't ask to be excused for telling him
so.
We did not charge Mr.. Chase with
Writing the Buffalo Abolition resolu-
tion," as the woolly of the Telegraph
falsely asserts. but that it had been Gre
ported to the convention by commit
tee of which Chase was a member, and
unanimously passed." although we
doubt not in our own mind he is the
author of the resolution. Thompson
even lies in this little matter.
As regards the resolution, cores
pondent of the Cincinnati Enquirer,
who has been looking over the files of
the Cincinnati Gazette, sheds more
light on this subject than any we have
yet seen. The Kyger woolleys also
have been very busy to contradict
the genuineness of this Buffalo resolu-
ton, but as the proceedings are taken
from that sterling old Wing paper, the
Cincinnati Gazette, we presume they
as well as the editor of the Telegraph
will agree with us in regard to the gen.
uineness of the resolution. If this is
not satisfactory they can call upon their
idol { (Chase) next Saturday and hear
what he may say of it. We are told
that Chase denies being in the con-
vention when the resolution was passed
of this we know nothing-but even
admitting he was not present, he was
a member of the convention, and if he
absented himself or lodged when it was
brought up for action he afterwards
sanctioned it by allowing his name to be
with the committee that re-
ported it. Here is the article, and eve
ry sane man will say it is clincher on |
Chase as well as the editor of the Tele-
graph and Kyger woolleys. Read it:
In the Cincinnati Gazette, of September
25, lS43, edited by Judge Wright, we find the
in reference to the Liberty Conven-
ton, held shorttime previous, in Buffalo, N.
Y, to which s. P. Chase was delegate, and
a member of the Business Committee
1--WE published, some days ago, the nullifi- |
cation resolutions of the late Liberty Conven-
ton at Buffalo. Our neighbor of the Morning
Herald took exceptions to this, and advised us
to wait for the official publication, when we
should be satisfied that the Objectionable reso-
lutions were not of the Liberty party. Yes
terday we received the official proceedings in |
the Liberty Herald, published in the town |
where the President of the Convention resides