Anti-slavery bugle. [volume] (New-Lisbon, Ohio) 1845-1861, 1855-08-25

All rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution
should be cheerfully conceded"
Among these rights which it would be I'M ustice
to invade, does Mr.. Chase include "the right to
hold slaves within the slave States? 1t would
seem 50 from what we have quoted, from much
more that we might quote, as we'll as from his ia.
%voritc motto, mo slavery outside of the Slave
States"
In his speech in the Senate, February Sd, 1854
he says, after asserting that Congress has no more
power to make q slavS than to make a king; nc
more power to establish an to establish
the inquisition.
cign States.
lie says:
"At the same time, tho Constitution %confers n O
power on Congress- but, on the contrary, denies
all power to interfere with the internal policy Of
any State. Sanctioned aud established by its own
Constitution, and its own legislature, in respect to
the personal relations of its inhabitants, the States
under the Constitution, are absolutely free from all
interference by Congress in that respect, except,
perhaps, in the case Of war or Instruction; and
may l~egislatc as they please within the limits of
their own constitution. They may allow slavery
if they please, just as they may license other
wrongs. But State laws by which slavery is al
lowed and regulated, can operate only within the
limits of the State, and can hpve no extra terrific
rial effect"
The Cincinnati Gazette says
The American Republican party in Ohio is a
conservative, reforming party. 1t seeks to pre-
serve the compromises of the Constitution, 5oth MS
th ~ ro ~ E,ooIor, o.I CIu-1-- .1--a - -.
olate.
The New York Tribune of the 10th inst, in re-
ply to Ex Governor Hunt says:
We beg leave to remind the Governor that all
this talk of the impracticability of emancipating
the Southern slaves, or of ele~vating the negroes in
the social scale through the action OF the Republi-
can party, is as wide of the mark rs Falstaff s re-
ply to Mrs. Quickly's accusations. The Republi-
cans are not likely to accomplish what they have
never proposed nor undertaken. They are quite
aware of the boundaries which divide Federal from
State power, and have not proposed to overstep
them. Tbon why are they lcctured as if they had
started on a "crusade" for the emancipation OF
Virginia's or Georgia's enslaved negroes?
Bnt we need not multiply extracts to prove that
the party, is not an abolition party, that it seeks
not the emancipation of our three and q half mil
lions of slaves. Itseeks only to stay the spread Of
stdrery, an object, we admit, of vast Importance,
but one which we have no hope of seeing attained
by a party which takes such special pains to as
sure the slavery extensionists that they are to be
forever unassailed in their strong holds in the
States. That the Union is to be unmolested and
their means and appliances for the extension and
perpetuation of slavery uncurtailed and even un-
assailed. 1t would be quite as sensible for the
Allies to hope to take Sevastopol by annoying and
assaulting an occasional party of excursionists
from the city while they assured the Russians al
every skirmish, that upon their honor, they had
no intent to cut off their reinforcements or sup
plies, and that they had an unqucstioncd right to
be secure from assault in the Malakoff-the Redan
and all the other regularly fortified strong holds of
the city. Just as soon by similar means, may our
Republican allies hope to take the Am Sevas-
topol.