New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-01-29

meni sssb,- them - tie ,S,rs. AT,
second piat the spp~sr. ss Ga It's Ia lie
sss Scsie. .45 to f-corded he P.,sas b ~ Ma
rson Ss. cseIes y eserss AZ ne t,s tos ~s,eh
and uessr- Sekes hessS Staples h.r
1s The or,.i Of gch power OF attorney 10 their h.nd. ..d
th-t the patent i,~ Of S gives rsat - the Coz
Psn,is crsred 70 r.ce hirs-' the ,a-d sasv
to y eoErss defendant the ground h>i assisnss
cot be exsmnsd except tea DAYS oies The Jsdxs Al
tia. sus,.iLes The oAecton snt did 50 Ia p2oSn 20 tbs
decision Term heh he'd tAss notice 70 an Asikner
oay yhsrs tie other party va, deae or vas net
tbs sit New tTa grated. costs 70 sofs syeot
Dodwoh az JOIN Paul Jones Ia relation 70 some .t--"-
.srips OF nu.cs Wors called tue School Tor s's.. B.sd
he employed Bnns 1syor 70 set up tie for " sad
pisis h ard refa.sd TO deliver II .-,i& th.t
lie h.d Ten for oa the trial verdict, unde, tue cir
rfpes There doubts IN regard The densgs, ard also
c the vsue o. the Plates rsrticasy Dodwcrih saocli
New tri'l ordered cost. to sbae sv-Et
..ts .o ,or the purpose Of 6Ts up Io. on Es. Rys4
ne Goes evidence that NJ Bsa ,uia
win the matter Reference esehrset aud tai granted
spesck sea Mayer ct I. Defendant leased premises 70
psItG In Chatham who hrsd for tbe purpose Of keeping
In the basement. and eonyenan'ee n 70 let.
allow any ether Tazs Of tie premise, TO De le Tor a.r
sArty eiiass restiicios who let hs sore
dsasses sid the Jude At tia. held that defend,as
liable for dssse IA. ssying noe ony n- would NOT
%.
the time however charged tn. rule Of da,sss be the off
in the receipts Of plaintiff, before ,ss after the
iuirs wrour although the might afford
the Jury. New tFh granted.
PATENT FOR IRON sAyE.
BY dseldsnt parc, Of pl.laa and E.s
sG @ sa 10 on s ne ana .n . &
per cent Afer using the nyeEon sesI. hey ssit
the trial been obtained sud refused pay The que-
ton Of fraud :ubmsd t. the ay who found ih. thee
Plaintiffs ssresa6J to the JgSg eharte was eudsd 20 ae
10 FER for years TIL. Court hink, he Judge in his
charge, wss ght judgment siErmed.
PROTEST on LOST NOTE.
css at 5a. sud ss sSs ~. o.
back 70 NewYOTk but neither received the mail
when pslla /, alleged 10 defsndan place bust
and ro fodns sy per.ou there e he sy notice Of
III aud motion made the report aside The deoi-
eerie- st be received notice but 10 aesnowedSs
That .itce the el 10 he. log up At prre
r.5etce FOR the frs, time tound purporngt to
~ roce but Of which about months atsr
refusal the osker in Augus.s to This Court hinks
from spresrsuce the the ex1ners,ed
rrcve that plaintiff Was suy aehes Unreasonable delay
Il to express Order OF reference vacsed
Perth ast Wa,errhs referee Of the eomrdat.
ether sales to be stated gave jutsnn for la'ser
than had been claimed The r-sne erred Ia soos
ont Of the bat both pse. did bu'nessyey loosely
Under eirouu ces gment siirued 49,
Set utz sat Bsiun Rasse % quesi,n costs; no 81
lowed la suit late psrnes who were the one "a
ecot ana III, slsIs 70 Zoo ,s r %p st gs0n
uTcn him while he sick fh. the Court thoufht could
not be allowed the rule 10 he among phyncsns
who're h that one attends UPON the other rs
CHARLES Lent the ndorsr the payment Of the note
the uotsry inquired hts late reteuce and as a. his ae
The complaint said that the ,ndoer hal 5seq personally
seyed with notice In 1t said ths' defendant had
net such hcts must STATED in the pesdnss, testimony
in relation 10 them cannot be given Judgment for pi'H'i
sfirmed.
LAW ~ TO PROPERTY or MARRIED WOMEN.
Tamsn sst HagshuTst, e o. 70 recover Isa,to,te
chate mortgage the piano foste which Belonged T. the
wife they bayics been married in 1870 lnd the piano toe
tsha Sst ae had i.ht to sell t. p,yas probably
a. 10 equity Of taemydoD. aud did 50 this CITY The piano
fne demsuded back OF tn purchaser bur reased Tue
question Is to sle rsh. Of vile the dsosi Of her own
Ipy under the a Of 1913 Tho Court consider. 'h,' her
by fuli snd coa pete aoder the st,tuts wholly
removed from The common - rule esa tsns Ter s''0s
husband in this had No. ht 20 SCI me pno !.e gag
of the referee on psntin affirmed In sum oil ~iS' out
emitted the So for damages.
SUITS AGAINST CORPORATIONS.
The Court announced that 10 the case OF II en'ons against
an crder for examination OF the Affairs cannot
b had sgslnst individual bat the processing mast be
under the Revised autes ou0a fo the le, rsoa o.
psers;y Of til uai tue 'PP,nt.Hi If re-
TRIAL TERMS IN FEBRUARY.
The Josss ;onsSaea '; me 81 ,sss "a FsS1 s
nochspics FsnsiIg AHcciaton sst Mellon psce-Orisr
diminishing the co1aat be set aside and order for fi
granted; coats 10 abide event. ~.
The Flimsr' and Mechanics OF Ken. colntJ az the Batch
eis ard Oroyers Bank -Jud affirmed. vita costs
VTrht R5herts Az. Adee n SIC Ais,er- Judgment re-
yersed aud new tai granted costs TO abide event
SPECIAL TgRM-JGdse Daer
Ieekbert and a. other at Me- ton -MOiO1 TO an1eni
bverlusug dau.4es latter GFst trs granted Bishop ani
oilers Weeks sId othef 10 eater Jifim.7t
Lu1c pro denied Atcack ssanit Gite,on. e., al NO
strke certain parts Of c1npa at ~ Irrelevant,
ssrted aheus sganst H-try Motion - vacate order OF
arrest ediBS decisions hA: the sisnee
Ct claim whore fsri "a ALLEGED 40 set the fraat AIR
agars. Stalker Motion continue iDIuct'on granted
WIislt ssaint Wosdw ard-Motion t injunction denied
Love agsst Leison Motion 10 sat ASIDE report 80 r-snr
denied ZabTotee against Robertson Defnt-nt Roberts le
IL 10 defend Psnigs against Sherman s1d Backus against
shelion, reserved of further consideration.