The Empire County argus., 1855-09-29
COURT REPORT.
DISTRICT COURT, ELEVENTH DIsTRICT-JOHN
NJ HOWELL JUDGE

DISTRICT COURT ELEVENTH DISTRICT-J0HN
NJ HOWELL JUDGE.
Stephens & Simmonds W J Burwe. Newell Will
liams tor plis, Robertson sandelson Hume Tor des'
Robneu VS. john Dill. kackife tor Pill. Contin-
John Kane VS. r D Foster Anderson s Brumfeld for
plf, Newell Williams for deft. Judgment for plaintiff
by The Court.
p O'B Murphy VS. Walhngford Dauforh. Murphy for
himself Newell Williams for des Change OF venue to
Sacramento county.
John Buckly vs. Corporation of Bradley, Berdan g. Co.
Hewes for plff., Newell q Williams for defs. Answer
Withdrawn and judgment for plf.
B Tanan vs. john d Scott. llewes for plG Judg-
ment for plff.
O'Toole VS. Adams & Co. Hewes for plG Judgment
for pf. -,
oSme vs. same Newell Williams for rlG Judgment
for pf.
lf Judgment for plf So
James 81 Gray VS. Adams & Co. Icwes for pf: Judg
ment for rif
Isaac F one VS. Adams Co. Brumfeld for pf. Con-
tinued for service
Z Sroui vs. Adams Co. strou for himself Judg-
A bgroy VS. Corporation of Bradley, Berdan & Co
Newell Williams toI pf. Judgment Tor llf
Samuel Sandusky vs. Corporation OF Bradley, BerdAn
Go. judgment i,I pln-
C,ru. Il Bradley vs. same. Judgment for Clff.
VIM tlookS VS. same. judgment for rlf
Hugh Mctmtock vs. same. judgment for rlh
Ii p he vs. same. Judgment for PHI
James Men ry > same Jdgmen, toi plf
LjSsOu ROsS VS. same. 1tWeS Dltltutu lot Iiu
Judgment tor rlf.
plf
Newell & Wia VS. sAme & w for themselves.
Judg .nent for pin.
EM Welon VS. same. Welton for himself Judgment
for plf ~
li.m Lyons ct al VS. y Bounds Patterson for plf.
Judgment Tor Ill.
- Wescou vs. Adams ct a. uewes for plf New
ell " lams or deit Onon. Dismissed as 10 Chiffon,
ana judgment against The o'ller det,s.
M.o,er lo.eI vs. " N Cromm etal. Newell & VIII
lians llls., Hewes Rae kite 1oi detts Continued
James Had VS. Ellison Abbot Robertson. Sandelson
iiume L plf, llewes and Newell " Williams for dets
Continued.
Newell Il nl,,ns Tor plhs Handy for dets Nonsult.
} illl vs. L Ii Perry et Ut. Newell W lanls for
plf Robertson, Sandelsoh Hume ior des. judgment
ior plt
J i Burton ct al VS. John Hatch ct al. Judgment for
plaintiff.
Same VS. same. Judgment for pff.
Hammond Schulz same. Judgment for plfs.
keser klpstme VS. W Barram. Robertson, Sander
son Hume for plfs, Patterson or det Judgment for
" V Powell VS. W Scott Newell Williams for plr
Hewes for deft Judgment for plf.
| Munson VS. j NJ GoetsChn Newell w Williams for
lff Judgment forpf.
T u. ay VS. lia;ch. RackIe for pllf Hewes for
deit. Judg gmen for plf
Z NJ W McKnstry VS. Lee McKinstry. Drumied for
ph', Anderson and Newell u llilans for de judy
Pilot and ok Creek Canal Co. VS. Martin ct aA Rob-
ertsOn, Sanderson d Hume and Newell d Williams Tor
pfs Nc CAum George for dofts. Judgment for pfS.
! l. Nalf vs. lleuinole ~ 20. NalF lof himself
ment for pltf.
IU Wa,,ers ct al VS. D Tanadge ct ai Robertson,
SandelSon liume and Iewes ur plitS, Newell VIII
hanls tor deiS Ground dspu,e divided pills recover
ing costs.
Nuoma Water aud Mining Company o4kes&Staples.
Newell Williams Ior plns., Rack fe or delIs Judg-
ment for pihs. The Suuh Fork Of ,he Amer can RIVER
d., ,cided no' uayg,bie for s.w-logs.
! II Aill.rd 5 d Bue Newell Will ms for pl.,
Robertson, sud lSon Hume ior def. Dismissed b,
agreement at piilut lis
American Il YER Water and Mining CO. VS. Amsden, VII
cox ct al. Newell Williams Tor pllf Robertson Sander
& Hume for dtfs. Judgment oI nonsut and motion
made aside
Charles Wade VS. Gas leburg. Racklife for plf.
Geoge Pope vs. John Roman. Robertson, Sanderson &
Hume or pn, Newell lllams Tor det Dismissed by
j staples e5 u VS. John Kelley ct al. Newell Williams
f pln,, Hall Anderson and Robertson, Nnderson "
iulc for dds. SPECIAL verdict taken under Amusement.
plh. Jud- -menl ior p.f.
A P4A on vs. Pltdnoe & Co. Carr for llT Judg-
nent for PLAN H.
Mediation & Doyles VS. Ingersoll Hewes for plT.
Judgl Tor planuif
hawks d Brown VS. Rennie & DeBos. Robertson, San
deison Hume for hHS. Continued lor service.
L NJ Sudervant VS. Grayson x Burroughs. Newell q
Williams for p,E Dismissed by ageen.en, at rla costs
Martin Gru,her John ID LuIi Newell Va
liams for plH Judgment for lH
Ii HI. on Sherman d Coiea Hewes for pf, Newell
Il WiI ms for detts Judgment for defS.
The People ,et ID l. bue sheriff st the 10 lrd
of Supervisors James Mckn ght Assessor and teo g. Ii
lngham, Recorder, reslo dents In this h. 81
upon the application Of reator, requiring Tia III show
why the Assessment oil OF lSJ5 should not he d
ytred to reltor. robertson Sandersou Y Hume for
lnor, Newell Y Williams for respondents Af.r argu-
ent the case was submitted the and take under
ddvisement
The People er rel E Buell. Sheriff against J VI Doug
lass respondent Attachment for contempt in r,tsi
pay ganshce the entire bill Of costs taxed by rea,o
az nst defendants in of douglass sawyer Ad-
u co The bill olyctcd to being that portion ohars
ed uper servc in Ctking Of attached popeuy
Argued and taken under a,iys Robe tsoI, >lndc.
ll,t1p vrnllt Nav N iIlinn.s rae.
tondent.