Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1855-12-15

retOfore.
IT. Of the Clerk within forty
Court 10 divide the Docket a.
70 newspapers Of general CIR
among the first, second, third,
e parties in such causes may
lnce win be required.
ore be the d1sy Of the Clerk in
sses 70 summon them to at.
I'd or fourth Monday Of tho
he cause stands on the docket.
causes will stand for
Ie term:
AIRY TERM, 1856.
i53 Letcher vs.. Hudson;
i54 Lowe v. Sloan;
l55 Moore vs.. Hughes;
1855 Merritt vs. Benson ct Al:
l55 Shaeklest W. Gilman;
l3s Stewart vs.. Edmondson:
l59 State Of Tenn use &c vs..
russell et al;
100 TreadWay 4 wife vs..
Goodwin admir-;
l6l Wallace vs.. AckEn;
i62 Thompson trus. vs.. Tenn.
and Ala. Railroad Co;
l63 Williams vs.. Glover;
l64 Beatty vs.. ClOdfeiter;
l6S TllmAn vs.. WilliamE
100 PetWsy vs.. Wilson ct al;
l6I Dunn vs. Kreider;
i6S Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
Co. VS.. Marlin;
1863 Shute vs.. \ 4 c Railroad
Co;
10 Ewing trustee Va same;
III n & G Railroad Co W.
Donelson.
10 Lanier & Falls vs.. VanHer
lTS Livingston vs.. Nssh. Gas
Light Co;
ia Gilman vs.. Wright;
iT5 Lanier q McNickle vs..
VsnEer.
tT6 Halle & Cows. Bridge Co.
III Young W. Summerhill;
rs CORPORATION Of Nashville
vs.. Rayford;
iT9 Same vs.. Higgins;
/ 50 Same vs.. RaifOrd;
Isl Same vs. Same;
iS2 Same ". Hamilton;
1873 Gof vs.. Stevenson presi-
dent, &C.
I - Crutehei vs.. Foster:
IS Childress vs.Mammsl et al
iS6 CSntrel vs.. Sloan,
1871 Doe, lessee, vs.. WagEo-
iSS Brigham vs. stratton e. al;
iS9 Same vs.. Craighead;
100 Same vs.. HAYS ct al;
1871 Bacchus vs.. Porter;
1872 BOsley vs.. Welch.
l93 Cole VS.. Mayor snd AL
derrnen OF Nashville;
"a Davis vs.. Bradley;
1875 Douglas vs.. Cartwright q
Armstrong;
1876 Frazier, trustee, vs.. Hin
ton;
1917 Glover 4 Boyd, use &C.
vs.. COllett;
195 Goldberg 4 Co. vs.. insa-
rance 90.
l99 Harris vs.. Pitts;
200 Hays vs., Edmundson ct al
sO1 Horn and wife vs.Stew4rt,
, Z Lellyeti 4 Ewing vs. Mills
\ Egan;
l03 Rollins vs.. lyman ct al;
- HallOwell 4 Go. vs.. Hun :
,uJ Hammond 4 Co. vs.. Luz
cas- et al,
,G6 Housley W. Hagan ct al;
,0T H0ke { Bro. ". Jackson;
us Hamwell vs.. Telegraph
Company.
l09 johnson vs.. Noore etaE
.iD James 4 Co. vs.. owen et
al
IL Insurance Company Va.
Peck q al;
~ jenkins W. Bush ct al;
3 Kerby vs.. Brockwsy;
IA Linsey vs.. Bridge Co.;
9t5 Mckinney vs.. Shelly;
nc McCamPbell, trustee ".
Hicks ct al;
III Same vs.. Marr;
rs Mcintosh vs.. Mayor and
Aldermen;
10 Nara vs.. Insurance Co;
20 Malloy vs.. Turnpike Co.
~ McROberts ct al vs.. Jack
son;
~ oldham W. Pau, ex'T,
20 PetEay IS. Crutcher ct al.
- Pope vs.. Washington.
9TH week.
70 Mining Company W.
Mitchell ct al.
&c Murrell vs.. Mayor and
Ald'mn Of Nashville;
y Ninuett a WincOOD VI.
McCOmbs et al;
IS Morgan 4 Co. vs.. Wick
house;
20 Mills vs.. Stewart,
80 Mart n vs.. Beatty;
"a MurTell 4 Matlock vs..
Tenn. a Ala. X X. Co;
20 Owens vs.. johnson;
80 Porterfield vs.. Beatty;
- Stewart a Co. vs.. Hume;
l35 Same vs.. Bowling;
.36 Samuels, BY neHt friend,
vs.. Mayor 4 Aldermen Of
Nashville;
80 ShegOgg vs.. slmms,
.3S Wright vs.. Crenshav,
80 Zimmerman vs.. McNAiry;
% Bank Of Tennessee vs..
Hampton Ell al;
81 Camuse vs.. Patterson;
a State Of Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson ct al,
rs Bell vs.. WEIGH;
a. Guthrie and wife W.
Rains;
IS Jordan vs.. Davidson;
46 Porter ". BergAn:
~ Livingston vs. Mayor and
Aldermen Of Nashville,
rs Barns vs.. Gilman;
40 Rains vs.. Williams;
so Childress vs.. Owen;
81 Corporal on OF Nashville
vs.. Hamilton;
SO Same vs. II ggins;
'58 Same vs.. Finn;
"a Same vs.. Gurnand;
:: 5 Ballentine We. Brown;
SO WOodfJlk vs.. N. and @.
Railroad Co;
81 Mayor 4 Ald'men Nash
vile exparte,
IS Mayor 4 Ali'mn OF Nash
vile eGparte;
,59 Olds vs.. McFadden;
100 Campbell vs.. CreDshaE
et al:
,61 Corporation vs.. Moore;
,62 Morrison vs.. Graham,
.6S same vs.. same;
- Same vs.. same;
,i0 Same vs.. same,
,6s same vs.. same,
81 Same ". same;
!. IS Pinkerton vs.. CrenshaE
et al,
20 Smith 4 Co. ". same;
lIO Same vs.. same;
2Il same vs.. same,
~ fame vs.. SANE,
2T8 Childress W. Hampton
et al,
2IA Jones vs.. Nance,
rs LeAke vs.. Harell;
sT6 Frey ct al vs.. knight et al;
~ Jackson vs.. Bell,
2lS DOdd vs. Henry a skinner
l7y Pope vs. Washington,
lS0 same vs. sames
3si Same vs. same,
lSl Peck & Bliss W Morton,
ls8 Pointer vs. Bell,
"a Papin " voisot,
lS5 Peck vs. Carter et el,
isS Paris W Jackson:
81 Sesy, trustee W rArpley
Pyle;
,Ss shute vs. Blgley;
80 stevens vs. Hamilton 81 al
40 Shuts vs. Badley ct al;
~ same vs. Williams et al;
,93 Van Dyke, adm'rvs Pearl
l93 WLdron vs. Scruggs;
g9t Warmoth " Casey;
.95 WhilWorth " SeAluny es
al;
90 West vs. Brown;
igT Warren vs. Union Bank
l9S Afford W Scales ex'r;
sg9 GleAves ct al admir- W
Resell et al;
300 fame " GoOdlett ct al;
8Oi same W East et al;
3Ua wlls1n W Carter,
808 whiteman " Carter.
80t LAnler 4 MeSickle "
Ewing, Dick 4 Go;
THO. 7. SMILEY, Clerk.
ING AND
HRnN VFnRK.