The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1855-04-06

ruPture between the cousins and advised TIE ss0d
back q the Instructions with percmptogy refusal ~
Prince asseuted has cousin and told him H., Il
Was not tn for such work that he was denosr,,
and would rather b with the DATED States than with ~
The natter dropped and has been resumed spo
least 70 the knowledge ~ my Informant"
II lis 70 be remarked that Mr. soulS makes nj,
mauicstion 70 his government upon bis Official and -
soual responsibility and this Is ample guarantee N,
The information i in All respects reliable Tho iO,,,
tons prepared IN view % anticipated stray,,
which % be struggle Of grincsslst Was "a l. !.
struggle between European aSsotstsss and America .
saocraey u the language Of his informant as qso. !
Mr. Soul6 There could be no aa6ls orar and gor,yv.
Ia Europe long the potsoRaas inaeaes o. oar ns
tons aud the prosperity ~ people ssdr ss 49,, -
putied 70 .. fe his ads n "a AaaHncs The az y,
the influence Of our republican Institutions upou he y,
bility Of "the divine right q kings 20 ule The rs
the entire determination q those Institutions and he 49,
sple the great law Of selfprcscryation monarchy mu
itself BY destroying democracy The objects q a,
extraordinary mission worthy Of yecisl attention.
to ascertain "how far the United s,atrs were yancr.,
voicsiy = 10 find out "what causes Of dssagson 10 4,
general government might exist IA as States with snd
Of much Ronsy the missionary might require to carr
out the instructions The fact that ths mission was oo
eocted in conjunction with General Narvaez Spn,A
leader and in anticipation Of struggle involving The do
tiny a. Cuba points unerringly 10 SLAVERY a. the 1.
neyable feature In which It was expected 10 sp9
causes nf dsgeerttoa 10 Tho general government n,
result Of the conference between Louis Napoleon ana
General Naryae1 that for the future security Of mon
archy in Europe, the destruction Of the American uaou
necessary and TO effect this object dssg6toa on a
Of slavery in the southern States was the RELIANCE
When the ostend eonrees in their report asserted tho n
stence Of this principle Of selfprseryalou as applicable
specified contingency the Cuba question, they ven
denounced in terms by certain journals in on
country but the assertion OF the principle by m
Napoleon and Naryaez at Parn regard 10 th
determination Of our federal Uniou has provoked nd
nant dsnunciaons from the same journals Who can d,
that the mission which Prince Napoleon rejected has no
been undertaken and executed by other missionary
there nothing in the rapid prsgross Of dsaeeton With
in the last few years which may excite suspicion as to ~
successful of the money rendered by Louis Napoleon
his cousin Napoleon Bonaparte However This may be w
furnished with satisfactory solution of the morc
which actuaed the French Emperor in forming an ALLIANCE
which dshonors the and the memory Of his lusri
GUS uncle
As means of giving permanence and security FL /
ropean absoutsm he combines with the nye,erae enemy
of France for the overthrow Of republic which brave
to establish When the great Napoleon cced Louisiana
the United States he is said have remarked oThe COO
cusion of this convention leaves me nothing TO aesir
The domain have ceded away, although disposed Of o
much less than its value strengthens orsr the power
The United States and rejoice in having thus given
England maritime rival that will sooner later hunbt
her pride His nephew the present Napoleon, unes witt
England to defeat the great beet Of bis ustrons und
The latter the necessity OF the possession Of the mou
Of the Mississippi to the safety and pernanence Of
Unon and he eeded IL to the former the
cessty in regard TO possession Of Cuba and he
into compact to prevent obtaining It'll The ON I
sought to strengthen and perpetate federal Union
the other seeks to undermine and dissolve IT, What
trast between the two Napoleonsl
The motives which have impoed Great Britain to en,e
into the alliance with France too well understood
require special investigation With her too II is srus
gle to destroy the influence Of successful republican
ample by exciting disafection in the States the
OF thticoy Hc GHloh
to us our great power in impressing upon other nation
the value Of our institutions AT the time that ~ &
carries this covert warfare upon repubcansm und
the shallow pretcxt Of philanthropy she keeps wac
eye upon the grand paramount object of her national ~
icythe advancement of her commercial interests Lca
ing 70 her commercial interests the London STANDS
doubts whether she would interfere in conflict beEr
Spain and the United States to Cuba, except for the oil
France She may sacrifice her interests In sub
contingency to her treaty obligations TO France
we venture the opinion that sl4e win not do wiIh
matnrely weighing the consequences. The bare pos@
ty not TO say probability, that in conflict with Sra
should have the combined forces o. E
land and France cannot but strongly impress The ADs
can people with the importance which these COWS
menis attach to the annexation of Cuba a Of
gladly see dissolved AT the time it should teach M
to appreciate at its true value Union whose ndur w
upon monarchies s much dreaded by crowned ha
and induce frown Indignantly upon those inter
manence. Whether they the results Of prejudice q
nstcism faction, they inure to the benefit Of the wars
Of monarchy upon republicansm.
THE POSTMASTER GENERAL. n
There is position connected with the adminisr's
Of the embarrassing and responsible
thar Of the Postmaster General II The discharges A' d'