The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1855-07-12

caused 81 ths evis enumerated BY the Journal In quss
tion. the principies should now behold support ADD
protection in the suxeranty Of the Porte whls they
approve q ever. thing tending to relieve them Of Rus
As regards the navigation Of the Dauubs-ws
hspry 70 say 1.-THE Cabinet OF St. Petersburg scknow-
lecgts the mpesecton Of the measures IL has taxen
M 10. open the monsas o. tnS os.
thoritss TO obviate the accumulation Of sand which
often rendered them unnaugible IT congrstulAte itself
upon tie esablishnen. Of commission which viii exer
else supervision tie principle OF which Il admit The
journal De 81 Petersburg assureA US that Il VIII not be
necessary TO shed the blood Of France and Ensisnd 70
procure those results nevertheless necessary to
shed that blood 10 obtain them.
The fourth point II will be remembered relates TO the
very quest on which gave rise to the fear that
this subject the Russian gsvernme0f stu persists Ia
IT. in TACT The Journal de 81. Petersburg talks to US
OF ctsary formAltes to attribute to the Sultan the
merit Of spontaneously originating the measures to be
tai en- IN favor of his Christian subjects, by manifest
contradiction It at the same time EXPRESSES the opinion
that they ought to BE- on the side of the Porte, the
objec. of rur4esn act which would be tantamount TO
onf.rrDg upon the whole OF Europe the privilege
claimed BY Prncs Menschiko for the Court Of Russia
sorcay refu'ed in the circular Of 23d OF May
We come 20 the reproach, addressed by the Russisn
govern ment to the Of France and Eng
apd OF having the rupture Of the Conferences
we viii readily admit that upon one OF tho two
points which constitute the third guarantee the
SIGN 10 the allies; it has renquished its old
prstenRicn TO keep the Ottoman empire beyond
oscyibe to engagement by which every differences
between The Porte and itself shah be future referred
to tbs az otIstion OF Europe but while .c.no weegog
Cabinet OF St Petersburg upon Its adhesion st last
principle which 1t openly repudiatsd before the war
mission OF the Porte into the law Of public right in Eu
rope does not entirely fuln the object the third qua
ranee II does pot put An end to the peponderance OF
The allied cabinets insisted, and ought to insist the
more upon that guarantee As without It all tho others
lima wif Of tha
forces OF Russia In the Euxne the suppression Of the
political religious protectorsts Of that Power in Tur
nominal.
tn subscribing the formula which we had put to II
rs Q preliminary condition for any negotiation, and
which Count Buo repeated at opening Of the confs
rences, Russia admittedat least fancy Bo-the
sesssy o. making real ',sTss On tn. point Bat no
potentaries the contrary rejected in principle and
IN practice, under any form whatever any limitation Of
forces The only object Of the counter propositions they
solve It.
consequence OF the absolute rejection OF the
system Of limitation proposed by that the confe-
were first superseded, and II after the publ
which renewed the declaration made in this respect 81
the Rursian psnpotentiariss that wero called by
Austria 10 a last conference.
was therefore to be presumed that In this last
meeting the plenipotentares Of Russia would persist In
rejecting the principle which alone could serve b.
tentsries, however, spprsciatng the proposition
by Count Buol-a proposition based upon principle OF
OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES
make be understood that Its did not de
pend upon them. But this condensation contrary
to their former attitude on the same ground had ev
Gently other object than to turn TO account the
pearance OF difference Of opinion bstween Austria and
Prnce Gorsct akof would not express an opinion un.
til he had ascertsined that the snpotsn
tiaries Of France and England would not adhere com
petey 10 the Austrian proposition. Provoked finally
de Pourquensy explain himself on the prn ,pis
OF limitation Prince Gortchakof, with frankness fer
which we thank him defined in terms which could not
N DYec Ctinna ha had nr arlv
urged against that principle.
Prince Go,tschaiog (says the protocol Of the last
meetng) repeated that, both at the Conferences and
outs,de them whenever the question was mootsd
be constantly declared that any limitation Of power At
tempted to be imposed upon Russia would be regarded
by It's penpotsniiaries attack upon the sovereign
rights OF their MASTER and as an nsurmountable obs.a
Gle to peace that he remained invariably true to that
principle, and that he again established 1t in that anal
sitting.
Prince GortchakoT therefore rejected at the close OF
the negotiation, rs he had done before all system Of
limitation he rsJectsd, in principle ths Austrian pro.
position he had rejected ours and thereby he took
upon himself to characte1zs his apparent moderation
ty CLEARLY proving that his o1er TO refer TO st Peters
burg ID not imply any idea Of Cancellation, It At the
Cabinet inadmssible. We simply stating what the
protocol Of the 4h Of June demonstrates hey reply
ks.sa therefore, must bear the whole responsibility
| macy which paralyzed the efforts noby made by the
allied Powers TO obtain practical result.
sentiments Of moderation with which they constau y
showed themselves animated In the different pha,es OF
prevent and the initiative Of ~hich rests entirely with
Russia, we have excluded her flag from every and
Euxne offered to allow II to do the condition OF
Limitation Of her forces in that Limitation Is
cuity which the general interests demand. Is not
Sa. exposed hsr. the demand p Of such
and tho,s only responsible for the continuation Of
tons obsnstsy refused to grant on that poi any
rous guarantee to Europe.
| important From England.
/ THE EFFECT OF SUNDAY PRoHIBIroRY LEGISLATION.
/ From the London Times, juno Is
| II any OF ,hoee misguided nobemen and gentlemen,
member: Of the Brtish Legislature; who have been in
strumental in pushing forward the for
cIipping ,he freedom Of action which the
hitherto enjoyed on the Sabbath had been present
afternoon they must have been spectators OF scens
which could require nothing TO satisfy them Of the
ted Several the persons chiefly OF the lower
classes assembled the right bank Of the Serpentns
between apd4 O'Clock yesterday For time they
were divided into little knots Of listening spectators
around groups laxative who held forth good
set terms upon what they called this fresh attempt to
crush the industrious classes As the carriages began
to arrive the assembled multitude moved from the
park and took up stations on either side Of the drive
along the banks OF the serpentne where they amused
Themselves BY hootpg Mt the inmates OF every carriage
as 1t passed. For time serious consequences
were spp-eher but as the crowd increased the ring
Leaders became holder and the noises and Of eco
10 ehurcn, &c assumed a mepa ing tone Lord and
Lacy Wilton LADY Granville and the Duke and Duchess
demand Of the muliituce. Several horses bolted
three or four difficult escapes place. There were
several peers and members Of the Lower House
ard Mr.. stafford and Others appeared deeply i'm
press ed with the painful exhibition OF public feeling on
this most unnecessary topic. What they observed VIII
rot be lost upon them when the question next
before the House there be fil- that any
further attempt 20 the bill will be met deserves
4 by the majority Of the House Of Commons.
THE VERY LATEST.
II BY rEIGRAPH FROM LONDON TO LIVERPOOL