The true Democrat., 1855-11-20
The Removal of Col. Noland.

The Incorrect version the last Gazette give! of the cause of the removal of Col Nolanc from the office of Receiver in Chancerv of the assets of the Real Estate Bank, makes it ne. cessary that we should lay before the public the whole matter The Gazette says:
 By his characteristic Jesutical'polcv, Gov Conway has, at length, succeeded in having Col. Noland removed from the Receivership in Chancery of the Real Estate Bank. The Mct of the removal of Col. Noland is matter of little importance to him or his friends: the means used, that his removal might be effected. are characteristic of the political Jesuit who resorted to them. The only regret that any one expresses, Ill regard to the matter, is that so high-toned and chivarous a gentleman as Col. Noland, should have been busted by such political sneak as Gov. Conway.2
 We will not descend with the Gazette to ban dying low epithcts We submit to the public in. to-day's paper, the whole correspondence which led to the removal of Col Noland, and the order of the Chancellor making the remo- val, with confidence that it will fully vind- cate both the Gov. and the Chancellor. The correspondence will be found n another col umn.
 By the laws of the State, it is Gov Conwav's duty to prosecute to successful issue, the suit now pending against he Trustees of the Real Estate Bank. Gov. Conway is a conscientious man, and he has labored faithfully and efficient ly to discharge that duty -fearlessly disregard ing the storm of bitter personal enmity that he might draw down upon himself in conse- quence In his official capacity he knows no- thing but the requirements of the law that he has sworn to execute, and thus far he has not been Swerved hairs breadth from their fulfil. ment by the reyilings and abuse of his enc mies
 Of Col. Noland we shal. not speak disre spectfully. We shall only speak of him as an officer of the law, who as such is amenabe to us and to every other citizen living under that law.
 Gov. Conway's letter to Col Noland ex- plains not only the situation of the suit, but also the duties of the various parties employed in eonncxion with it. This letter should be read by every one with care The suit was. and now is, at stand still, awaiting the con- pletion of the abstracts required by the Chan cellor to be prepared. The making of these abstracts was the duty of the Receiver. The Receiver was required to make them out Gas speedily as practicable" and the " trust fund !" Isposal to defray the "expense
 Hexpedte their completion, which
 ohiaot of tho Il. ceivefcould have employed an unlimited num- Der of clerks and finished the business at once.
 This the Receiver did not do The suit was making no progress. Time was flying and the public were becoming justly inpatient Unier these circumstances, the Governor ad- dressed an official communication to the Recei- yer, asking him for information in regard to the completion of the abstracts, and. at the same time, pressing upon him the great importance of his early action. The progress of the whole suit depended almost entirely upon him, and it was absolutely nescessary that he should make rapid headway.
 To this letter Col. Nolands reply will be seen. It was not what Gov. Conway expec- ted. But what he felt it his duty to lay be- fore the Chancellor for his consideration.
 The balance of the correspondence and the order of the Chancellor explain themselves We refer the reader to them.
 Gov. Conway is strict in the discharge of his official duties and he s conscientious. He suffers no interest of the State to lie neglected for the want of prompt and energetic action, and in his duties, he is man that shrinks from no responsibility. What duty demands, that he does, unmindful of the consequences per sonally to himslf regardless of the camor that he may raise at his heels Many a man with less tenacity of purposc-wth less regard to the public interests, would long since have been driven from the prosecution of this suit by the warfare that has constantly and bit- terly pursued Gov. Conway
 For the justification of the Chancellor. who is also indirectly assailed in the article of the Gazette, we also refer to the correspondence With all candid and impartial men, that cores pondence will justify the removal Chancellor Farchild is man whose integrity of purpose, frmness and legal ability stand above reproach or even suspicion His action in this matter was pal. pably just, and to those who will read the cor respondence, there will be no necessity of sup posing him circumvented by the "Jesuitical polcy''of political sneak" in order to justify hs removal of Col Noland.