The Trinity times., 1855-06-23

T,to NJ. :, March 81.
" An act to authurine Caruthers and Stew
art TO use the waters of the Stanlslaus river
for manufacturing purposes"
Veto No. s, .qpH2.
" An net 10 discharge The Board Of War
Examiners from further duties"
Veto NJ. 8, AlrH2.
" An oct TO authorize ii. Henderson, John
Doolng. L. Thompson and others to con.
struct wagon road from Eureka. in Nevada
county, to the Truckee Meadows, east ol the
Sierra Nevada y
PCto No. 10. .fprH 2G.
An act granting Geo. Nj. Hanson, John
C. Fall aud Elizabeth E Nebb. the RIGHT to
construct suspension bridge over Feather
river, above the Y Yuba',
Ve'o No. IL, Aprd 80.
An act annuIllng the State Prison con.
tract
Netocs Nos. 5, G, 7, 8 and TO- are based
upon the same ground as Veto No. 4, viz :
" that they propose TO grant the powers and
privileges of corporations to associations or
joint stock compan es, aud refer To the an
swer % Veto No. for the reply to all these
Veto No. let pass, as it was simply ON
account of clerical error in enrolling the
bll,, and it was well enough to have returned
1t lur CORRECTION.
word, IN this connection, call Your at
teniiun To The doctrine endeavu,ed now TO b,.
established, for the first time. into the plat
form of the Democratic party viz: that ii is
unconstitutional ard impoiinc 10 inprore Ms
'nnpy ty iuildi & byidges, io0dS, canais,
tohdireS, DC j., by private enterprise. The We
toes Of ;he Governor take this ground and
assume that it is Unconstitutional to grant to
associations or Individuals those powers -
Waist he rrfocd a bill ,oh ch ootdd h7re c9n.
SHucfed a adgda Rad % rthr StrrJa Nepada
mo"nfat,S, by pirate ~ e'pris". 10 tt'm any
toSf lch HeUcI 10 III >td'e. Gee Peio No. o. he
"PPore II 6Ft WhiCh appI0pIiateS Cm of hc
State Toa'HJy sos, 900 for The Sume pu,-
POSE.
Two-thirds Of his Veoes are based upon
the Federal doctrine that internal improve
mcnis should bc ,ct,d hy the Government
aud not individuals. A construction so ut.
trlly bverslvc Of the rights of individuals,
and tending So directly ~ tho consolidation
of all powers and PRIVILEGES ia the hands Of
Government, never was intended by lhe ma
m,r Of our Constitution
The veto If the b annunp the State
Prison contract has been made tie great bug
bear by which the people are led 10 believe
that John isiger is III. man. and tie oaig
man - that he has saved to the State 5 81 900
| at u slnole swlpe, &c. &c. Let thcnhnot
be deceived. The end is not yet, aud tins
veto At the end of the next Legislature may
be found iAe the veto OF the Deficiency bill
IN iSjl, To have cost the state double the
amount originally intended to have been ap
proprutcd. The veto Of the Deficiency bill
of 1874 cost the State at least s 90 900
Hop y"c will ask, and 'oiy2 Brcau>e The
claims which in 1874 mlght have been satis-
fed 10y II comparatively small amornt, IN 1879
have sW"lIcd to nearly double their formcr
szf Witness the law appropiin,ng fl7 900
to I}. r. Rrdjmg, State Printer, and Kerr .S
Cos to Indemnify them for interest on money
borrowed 10 carry on the printing of the
State. This bill was signed. wl,hout hesta
! ton, ty John B.gl,r--hs friend, Rcdlne,
Editor Of the State Journal WITS iutcr-
eslcd
AT the time when The fcssee of the State
Prison stepped forvard aud relieved the State
Of the expense Of keeping The prisoners in
! lS12, the State was paving ~ the rate Of one
hundred thousand dollars per year COR n It
! they would have varied hule from that. the
cost of keeping the prisoners now on hand,
viz: 300, to the State, would be- 8 800 .00O -
The lessee has kept these prisoners now for
three Years, without any cost 10 ne State. cx-
ccpl Sl5000 }, Tor buildings portion Of pr-
SON. uni has thus saved TO the State at least
one million Of dollars. Whilst this service
| has cen lul,e the State BY the essee, he
! a /
! ishcd 5y { 'e contract. 1t is true the contract
; wos voluntarily undertaken, and probably At
/ the time it was thought by the Lessee TO be-
valuable, but the State having faded to erect
"a sufficiently extensive and SECURE prison f,i
! the sale keeping Of the prisoners, as was his
! understanding at the time the contract Was
/ taken, he has consequently been al unny un-
| for. cen and unexpected lusscs. lie now
comes forward aud says 20 the State, ren,u-
uoiate me for my losses place me ID lhe CON
dllion was when took upon myself IBIS ser
vice and am satisfied. And surely it Vould
appear tlat onc who has saved 80 much to
/ the State, as wr have already shown, should
be entitled % some lttle consideration. The
amouu, vh'cl lhe law proposed To apprupri
ate was lite more than suili lent to Lou date
vac tnsit ~, VIC ''';'f II the Governor however, al
know. ,praug purely and solely from political
cnmlty. The time has been, and that not
/ unn g.ncc. when he would have sanctioned
anything desired by Gcn. Estcl. predict
that Tins veto viii cost the State double the
amount proposed 10 be appropriated.
Fefo ". -, ApnL 30.
Sc Nn act supPtrnTrrt'ffJ t0''t' ~ ff'FlA'iln@
for the SAFE of tie interest Ol the state WITHIN
/ ,b. wa,-r line front 81 san Frame SEQ
The only objection urged against tliis bill,
Is. tint Is Urrecess0'y
The b.li provides that the Governor, Secrc-
;ary Of stat and (outrol ar, shall hereafter
constitute the Board Of State Land omnis'
sioucrs, aud shall perform all the dutl's r..
ouired by law to be performed by tie }"afd.
uith,uf comper ,attoo. TINS bill thus rlds the
State of the salarl,s Of tie present members
Of that Board, amounting 10 some sh''h
thousand dollars per annum, ana req"
other ~tnte oficers 70 perform lh" dunes -
SG.in Tie opinion of lhe Governor It "as
,nn,cessa,g-tbe c'I'almcnt u needless *
,.,dnur,s WAS unnecessary. one would
D,.t che manner WlIcN he itIgt