Nashville daily patriot. [volume] (Nashville, Tenn.) 1855-1857, 1855-12-17

itigated eases and judgments
retofore.
ity Of the Clerk within forty
! Court 70 divide the Docket as
To newspapers Of general cir
among the hrst, second, third,
e parties in such causes may
ance viii be required
ere be the duty Of the Clerk in
esses 70 summon them 20 at
I'd or fourth Monday Of the
he eaus e stands on the docket.
causes viii stand for
he term:
AIRY TERM, 1886
1853 Leicher vs.. Hudson:
l54 Lowe vs.. Sl0ar;
is5 Moore vs.. Hughes;
1856 Merritt vs.. Benson ct al:
l5l Shacklstt vs.. Gilman;
l5N Stewart vs.. Edmondson;
ls9 State Of Tenn use &c vs.,
RUSSELL ct al;
100 TreadVay L wife vs.,
Goodsin admir-;
iel Wallace vs.. AckEn;
90 Thompson tru.. vs. Tenn.
and Ala. Railroad Co;
lt3 Williams -. Glover;
l6t Beaty vs.. ClodfelteF;
$50 Tillman vs. Williams;
i66 Petg az vs.. Wilson ct al,
l6T Dunn vs.. Kreider;
los Tenn. and Ala. Railroad
Co. vs.. Marlin;
i69 ShUts - y & c Railroad
Co;
no Ewing trustee vs.. same:
AN n & @ Railroad Co ".
DOnelson.
tT2 Lanier ( Falls vs.. yanlier
1TS Livingston vs.. Nash. Gas
Light Co;
ia Gilman vs.. Wright
IT5 Lanier & McNick
IT6 Halle & Cows. p
la Young W. SUNNI.
rs Corporation Of Mas. -
vs.. RayfoTd;
10 Same vs.. higgins,
IiS0 Same ". Raiford,
81 Same vs. Same;
ISL same ". Hamil,org
I; iS3 G0h vs.. Stew nson presi-
dent, &C.
.iS4 Cruichei vs.. Foster.
|is5 Childress vs.. Manned ct al
'iS6 Cantrrl vs.. Sloan;
Isl Doe, lessee, vs.. Waggo-
iSS Brigham vs. stratton st al,
IiS9 Same vs.. Crsigheaa;
100 Same vs. Havs ct al;
1871 Bacchus vs.. Porter,
Il91 Bosley vs.. WEIGH.
1873 Cole vs.. Mayor and Al
dermen Of Nashville,
i94 DAVIS vs.. Bradley;
l9J Douglas vs.. Cartwright q
Armstrong,
i96 Frazier, trustee, VS.. HIN
ton,
'l9- Glover & Boyd, use sc.
vs.. COllett;
.i95 Goldberg 4 Co. vs.. Insu-
rance Co.
1893 Harris vs.. Pitts;
200 Hays vs EGmundson ct al
I01 Horn aud wife V. Stewart;
Y 2 Lellyeit 4 living vs.. Mills
q Egan;
2O3 HOllins vs.. Ryman et al;
80 Hsllowell a Co. ~. hul e
3Oj Hammond & Co. vs.. Lu-
cas- et al;
l06 HOusleY W.. iisgan et a.;
-O7 H0ke / Bro. -. jackson;
POS Hamweil ". Telegraph
company
2Og johnson W. NJoie et ri;
.2iu James 4 Co. ". owen Ct
al
PHI Insurance Company Y.
Peck It al.
tf2 jenkins vs.. Bush et al;
2I3 Eerby ". Brockway;
ia Linsry W.. Bridge Co,
2i5 Mckinney vs.. Shelly,
zi6 McCampben, trustee vs..
Hicks ct al,
21T Same rs. Marr;
2iS Mcintosh vs.. Mayor and
Aldermen,
2f9 Nara vs.. Insurance Co;
500 MallOy vs.. Turnpike Co.
22l McRoberts q al vs.. Jack
son:
222 Oldham vs.. Paul. ex'r,
Iy23 Petway vs.. Crugcher e. al.
"a Pope vs.. Washington
lth week.
225 Mining Company vs..
Mitchell ct al
226 Murrsll vs.. Mayor and
Admin u Nashville,
22T MinEett 4 WincoOp vs..
McCOmbs et al,
22S Morgan 4 Co. vs.. Wick
+. house,
300 Mills vs.. stewart;
$50 Martin vs.. Beatty;
23l Murreu 4 Mailock vs..
Tenn. & Ala. K X. Co;
2s2 Owens vs.. johnson;
.S3 P0rterfeld vs.. Beatty;
23k Stewart a Co. VS.. Hume;
.285 Same vs.. Bowling;
236 Samuels, by next friend,
We. Mayor 4 Aldermen Of
Nashville;
PSI Shegogg vs.. Simr1s;
235 Wright vs.. CrenshaW;
239 Zimmerman vs.. McNairy;
240 Bank OF Tennessee VS..
Hampton et al;
PAL Camuse vs.. Patterson;
242 State Of Tennessee vs..
Wilkinson ct al;
2i8 Bell vs.. WEIGH;
pa Guthrie and wife vs..
Rains,
PAS Jordan vs.. Davidson;
) 246 Porter ". Bergan:
247 Livingston vs. Mayor and
Aldermen Of Nashville;
! PAS Barns vs.. Gilman;
249 Rains vs.. Williams,
$50 Childress vs.. Owen;
25l Corporal on OF Nashville
VI. Hamilton;
252 Same ". Higgins;
stS same vs.. Finn,
254 Same vs.. Gurnand;
2 3 Balleutine vs.. Brown;
256 Woodfllk vs.. ". and c.
Railroad &c,
25T Mayor 4 Ald'men Nash
vile exparte;
955 Mayor 4 Al i'mn Of Nash
vile expeTte,
l59 Oids vs.. McFadden;
ECO Campbell VI. CrenshaW
/ ct al,
2si Corporation ". Moore;
J 262 Morrison vs.. Graham;
k63 Same ". same,
2g4 Same vs.. same;
PCS Same ". same,
26S same W.. same,
. 81 Same ". same.
l65 Pinkrrt1n vs.. Crensl aw
et al;
p 9t9 Smith A Co. vs.. Same,
go Same vs.. same;
al same vs.. same,
.2I2 Fame ". SAINT,
2T3 Childress vs.. Hampton
al,
pa Jones ~. Nance,
KS Lcake IS. harell;
ZIG Frey et slys. knight ct al.
~ Jackson vs.. Bell;
rs Dodd vs. Henry a Skinner
zIs Pope vs. Washington;
lsD same " same,
81 same ys same;
2Ss Peck 4 Bliss vs. Morton,
20 Pointer " Bell,
- Papin " VoiEof;
2s5 Peek W Carter q el;
2s6 Paris vs. Jackson.
1sT seay, trustees vs. Tarpley
kPyle,
'fs3 Shutc " Bigiey;
go stevens " Hamilton et al
80 shute " Hadiey et al;
Z9i Same " Williams e al;
293 Van Dyke, adm'Fss Pearl
k93 Waldr0n vs. scruggs;
z3t WarmOth " Casey;
lz95 WhigWorth W SeAiuny et
al;
50 West " Brown.
ggI Warrcn " Union Bsnk,
a9S Aliord " Scales ex'r,
xsg GleAEes et al admir- W
Resell &c al,
800 Fame " Goodlctt et al;
Sol same W last u 81;
80 Wis n W Carter
StS Whiteman " Carter
800 Lanier a McNickie W
EWing, Dick & Go,
THO. T. SMILEY, Clerk.
Ing AND