Sauk Rapids frontierman. [volume] (Sauk Rapids, M.T. [i.e. Minn.]) 1855-1860, 1855-11-22

he President, and yet he does not seem
. have qualified himself as y counselor
" examining both sides Of the subject
1ov. Reeder fell into the same error
when lie returned 10 Pensylyania, short
y after The elections in Kansas. Iii his
speech to his neighbors u Easton he de-
1ounced with bitterness sths violence
md force Of the Missourians, but he
overlooked the conduct Of the Massa-
chusetts Abolitionists, on whichthe Mis-
based their plea 81 Justification.
IN the late Democrats Convention az
Syracuse the same error v as committed
the outrages charged upon the Mis-
sourians were strongly censured. but the
interfesrrences ofthe Abolitsonists which
has provoked those dntrages was en-
tirely passed over ss 3a ash \ =
Being acluated by no sectional feel
iug IN this matter, and being bound by
his official obligation To know no North
Or South, hut 70 carry out the law III i,s
true spirit and meaning, tbs President
has not overlooked the embarrassing
circumstances which are connected VIII
the Kansas question:. but, % Tie cbntra-
iry has heen ready ut all times to- exert
alithe power vested inshima for thespre-
yentionssof any Of those inserfarences,
whether blythe Influence af capital and
money by force and violence, which
are alleged ia have been resorted TO, far
the defeat ofihe true ineaning and prita-
tciples ofthe laM.e The Advertiser will.
therefore, see thatttherts is not the slight
sest danger that the President will give
6 the Executive. sanction to the illegal
procee edings of Atchisnn and his icoad-
sjutorsinf Kansas. = and thereby give an
impulse ito the Republican movement
which wouldarender Il irresistible i'm the
Free States. Heihas not, and he will
moi, J, len] any countenance to any Illegal
sprpceediag. Observation-Disclosures in Mis-
sonrI dr Massachusetts, !, II ylaicI,shaa 6r
|itsqobject the defeat efther4 great psin-
ciple b. allowing The inhabilants OF Kan
|sas to give an unbiassed and free Judge
Inent tupont the, question ~heshsr Slave
~ shall or shall NOT no9 il exist in the Terri
tory. as aps sass, tif u a.ss s''s ssssss' /
r. ~ ) Saatasss TgA ass--p-laasa Ys4-4sssI} TEk5
fi' .Buteif we dr. not n,is,tndersland il'hs
FAdyertisershe deems il, The duty of TIL.
President 70 interfere actively IN som.
way to avoid the inference. that he / ha.
acquiesced in the efforts nf the Missouri
ians 10 force Slavery on the Terri.or,
against the viii of the inhabitapls.s, w
wonder that il did not oceurltoIthe, edi.o
that bis proposition assumes. that it i
the business Of the President, first, tt
determine whether the. inhabitants .
! Kansas want, Slavery Or pot-that VA
distinctly left, 70 the decision of the! .peo
pie and not to the PRESIDED. =. then + +
decide whether the Missburiannas hav,
forced Slavery bpoa them and finally
tthafth President has i righf to exer
some power Of dos some Act 10 'shoW tha
1thei Executive deesnnot acqniesce in til,
Eillegal proceedings. III. As amazing wha
j ant amount ef aerno,i .spre vailss ash to- th
tpower ofthes Pee siJentsEtp siptarfefedfo
i the prev eptlons 81 eerreG Gtlensef ieseYil
| allegeditos have a .tcqn panied tbs KaDsa
,Ielsclion. sMenef intelligence who hay
been disappointed as TO- the. result i
Kansas, seem te i,,pxerlooked the plain
estsRrinciples Of constitutional Law, an
i ltosassumes without reason Or reflection
1thatit was competent for the tPrssidsa
i @tothaye exertAd a paw er THAI staatd hav
] sI.preYentsdi the illegal sintsr srtrrenceI oiih
i sMissoprians. The law.Iprganizing.t .th
i ltTefritory Of Kansas defines sthes peWer
ana dasies aef the President, and we tx
aniined ii Iii vain 'foff tie slt,th6rity unde
/ which ne could have guarded lie balfot
! ! box against fraud sar violence. i e 'Gha, y
! should have sheea s,ppFised ~ sadvanc
I Of any such occurrences isl III itself.
lpreposterous assump'.orl! u bpt even
/ that had been possible, w have bee
wholly at faul, il 2 our u effnrt q locate II
executive power to interfere II uchI
case. a8s fSss !. Y
glHiastsI aaIf5As3sa a sSEsse ssxs Il Ssss ssss A
We he have seenthe remark made aeai
II apd md again by partisan part II n
Il President that ne II responsible for III