Sauk Rapids frontierman. [volume] (Sauk Rapids, M.T. [i.e. Minn.]) 1855-1860, 1855-11-22

ut tiiR President To select Hlau above
suspicion as to his position On the Slave
wv question; and Notwithstanding the
present ass.,ciationso of Gny. Reeder, We
are not disposed to credit the charge 4
that Tie was unsnund when appointed
We believe that lie was national man
then, whatever he may have becenfe
noW.H fl ss VI aas
But suppose the charge be lrue that (say.
Rc4der wa \ a Free Soilef when lie weni
III Kansas, then tho anti-slavery people
III the North will cnncede that his APP
3pomr,ment was jndieious, whatever they
may say of Ais removal H will hardly
sbe .dnnhted that II President Piercessss ss
derelict of duty in not foreseeing anu
preventing the Illegal incursinns " the
AIissourians into Kansas, then Gov.
Reader must necessarily have been much
more 5derelict- He was appointed and
sent To Kansas to snperintend ia person
the faithful execution ofthe law. AZ
trr the election he commissioned the
Ideiegates elected How unreasonable.
then, tpr the admlrers and syinpatizersI
LIT CIV Reedcr to censure the Presi-
lS, gfF8t a$f55#$# #$HSs $t&#. $% lG7s77 |
| dent
II Cav Reeder failed to do his duty in
carrying out the law, his friends would
hardly think Of holding the President
Irresponsible, If Gov. Reeder discharged
his duty it devoives on his friends to show
THAT the President was in some way de-
inqnent in sustaining him before he can
be properly censured. But we strongly
suspect that the real ground Of dissatis-
faction With the President is that he
ffound it necessary. in the discharge of
Ibis official duties, to remove from Office
Gov. Reeder, and certain other officers
| from the South as well as from the
North lis falsely assumed that the
! fact of the removal shows that the sym
spathies 81 the President were with the
EAiissourians. We have heretofore laid
all the documents connected with Gov.
Rueder's, removal before our renders.
10 one who desires only TO arrive at
truth could fail 10 see that Gov. Reeder
was removed On matter wholly distinct
from the question whether the President
sympathizel will, tie Pro-Slavery or the
An,i-Slavery p;:rty Upon careful an
II, SIS u tte \ prevalent feeling" in the
Free. States 1a which 1sss IN Arqrsiser ad-
u vel,S With X, salch pucer.,s We think he
will find tAatit pves much Of its ihapos-
4 ing character t. the -clamorous Aboli-
tionists who care nothing tar Gov Reed
er, 81 the Kansas people, Or the prin-
ciplee Of the Kansas bill !, except as they
4 can; be made. available for swelling the
flide df sectional agitStlon in which such
Epoltical spectators hope to float into
/ high offices. To conciliate such feel
ing President Pierce will never swerve
! from n f,ithlul discharge Of the, duties
i 5devolyed upon h.m ; he has heretofore
I hdetied Abolitionisn, IN ali his phases, and
he viii continue to stand firmly by the
{ principle Of the Kansas bill, believing
-Ithat, il. is destined tea glorious triumph
t1sand that liz that triumph sectionn ag I.
,shatinn will BIZ, effe ctuaiiy crushed 10 death
tll,,ss t'.f f".t.-. ] .-..l. .-. ..-..-.- .8=5 af
I, g. The San Francisco Herald sspe'
Gamer. Z dated "Wednesday morning
~ Sept 5th has the following paragraph
|. (which will be decidedly interesting il
] this con'nutiitaAg; !. ts,.i,,..,.,s,.,., s.,.
: ARREST Under 4 REoulslrloN. ~ ~ 4
/, t&Shr,fi'''s ~ etl,cer,s from the city Of Cincin
,iEuali, arrived here in the steamship So
n nofa on Saturday, With d reqn,sitio,
J .'Eiif from the Gdvernppfs of Ohio. for The per
,ftIson pf one Peter 3, Manchester, VIII,
: arrived int this city about two month
d since, and recently commenced practic.
as i lawy er. II y alleged that Manchest
y[ter was the proprietor of Savings Banl
! lat Cincinnati, il. which business he fail
led; during last year,Iand thai, he was 81
] Espectedsof.ncts Of dishonesty, but man
! aged 10 slide Justice, and escaped from
1 the sceae ofhis financial troubles. 500,
! after he left Cincinnati, some forged pa
Z pertof his make, turnedup, and bis cred
81 TORS immediately procured requisitiol
II for the arrest IN this State. The accns
III ca was arrested On ! police warrant
4 issued under an affidavit ofthe Ohio of
NJ t|lficerin this city, The complaint charg
! ~ Manchester,with having endorsed III.
], ia ne of Fred Franks tos two noes 0
u S668 each. The prisoner was granted
y v private hearing before the Major, an,
y alleged that he WAS able 70 disprove III,
4 charge prefrrred against him, Man