New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-11-19
LAW INTELLIGENCE
SUPREME CoURr-spr1AL rrsn-No,

SUPREME COURT-sPEcIAL frss-Sov IL.
DECISION BIT JUDGE cowLEs AS TO hETROPoLiIAN
GAs-LIGHT COMPANY.
and the me N bers Of the Board Of Aldermen
A temporary INJUNCTION, already stated wss OBJ
timed pohbtpe the Of Bovd Of Aldermen from
eoneonD, in the resolution Of the bond o. pvs
tbe company from taking AZ, .eton under
their ehsrtsr being eopsended that tue law az eonsu
don vas made TO disso the INJUNCTION and rgued-
Judge COwles rendered decision this forenoon AZ 70 tss
sepss on behalf Of the people As the idea Of franchise
Tie ys, psOs 70 her, err, ..sd red no. a ss s
Council has rsht fsces If they
ss = aa r.. S: cry as e. % g.
Cour ell within the vady belonging 70 IT, ana me
tonsy ID mayor having been added BY the law,
therefore, need not be alluded 70 here
the company cannot proceed without the concurrence OF
ID, Beard Of Ale retaining the as;ns them
would be leanh it sg.inst the company nuneuon ~ 70 al
the defendants dissolved costs 10 abide the event.
INJUNCTION As TO SHIP JOSEPH WALKER.
On spplicatiop we believe, On Aid Herrlck, an in
junction Obtained this forenoon pouibns the mayor and
controller from making the ias payment IN the Joeph "hei
oEcIsIos-coSTEsT FOR CUSTODY OF LITTLE GIRL.
In the of the petition of VIM Coosnt Or the su
arshipo Mar Augusta Consnt
The little miss in question is now about nine years
Of ss Both her pusDl are dead her mother h.ynl been
eI biz wife. death placed child with great aunt who
resided the family Of Nj and Mira Burts in this city be hay
s resided here who BE- mach attached to the ehd
a not out letters Of su'rdsbshp for it, bat her unse the
pnu respectable appearing man, after the death Of her
ftber no child With bin little Of the um.) got
aw.y 10 Connecticut, and Mr. Bu went and rook H. bu, wa
injected complaint Of the uncle for Ednsppss and
put deal toube and considerable bad feeling ere
sed Mr. Burs died. ard Mrs. Bus who 10 possessed OF
very considerable property obtned letters Of yud,nsmp or
it, Mr. Cor ant cJDes as pext OF RID OF tne De si
and G aims her Gus ody, which opposed. .
In this case aires fsusd the judge made decision Of
which I, fol owing are ext scts:
The gu, on which control IN dsposg OF this question
H. What l. n ost for the Of this Infant child
do oscovr any important facts governing the e.e whh
did not KS The date OF the appointment Of Mrs surts IS
Guardian unless may be tbs uuw Of Mrs b. 70 have
the cbld viiited by the petitioner and bis family.
must confess little hesitation In not evokns this mr.
decision Of III. e.se on the question of gusrdisnshp
Bot further reflection cannot but FEE that AL things
the Of the chd will be regarded and
subserved by leaving it with Its present guardian.
Mrs Burs ehfdles widow evidently attached with sin
cere affection TO the child daughter Of the early and
cherished friend Of her ghood and not too much TO sup
pose that years ibis poo,les child would - TO her
ten poa Interests be eCby stu,ted with her present
susrdan mother than brought In the family OF her
uncle hind and attentive a. be might be
With Of hope that Mrs Burtis viii be TOO
deny all intercourse between the child and its fea
o. belief the best OF the child
require deny the application TO change the guardian
ship of the infant