New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1855-08-04


which had continued, with very shght intermissons,
tl the commencement Of the said suit, that no issue
had been had by their marriage but she asked d.
yofce from bed and board, and that he be directed 70
afford a suitable allowance for her maintenance
She stated thai the night Of March 2j, nineteen
days after her marriage che had retired to bed al their
refideIoe in Grand-st., when he tied her hands AID
feet and threw Der out Of bed, and struck and IL
treated her and threatened 10 cut her throat that
frequent occasions he struck her several blows a0d IL
treated her-mOst Of the time no other persons being
present; that occasion during July or August,
1854 be dragl ed her out Of bed by the hair her head
On ore occasion he locked her out of the house in
Broadway 10 which they had removed their residence,
ape che compelled % return 10 her store 10 Grand
ri. 10 sleep. She kept ready made linen store in
GraId.st having q stock worth about $500 in her
owl right which she CHARGED that be bad threatened
to sell and convert TO his own use During the win
ter of 1884 be away 10 Philadelphia considerable
psrt Of the time. When be came home on Que occa-
sion be seized her by the throat and chOked her. and
only dessted when she had called out a number
Of iimes On one night in Broad ray, when she vas
asleep he got in through the back window, when she
woke up and found him in the room, and after lying
down short time he began she stated, TO abuse her,
and pulled q handful OF BAR out of her head and
struck her. She also alleged that on one occasion he
toos liberties with girl while she Mrs was in the
psntry-he not knowing she vas there. i told him,
she stated that had seen him, when he abused and
struck me, and in the morning when | came down
stairs he again quaireled with and abused me.
The examination was had before l.. Livingston,
Eco. Mr. ROmertze did not appear to answer or e1
plain the charges and the Referee presented report,
we understand in favor OF limited divorce and an
allowance Of certain sum per year 70 Mrs. X but
she appears to have then abandoned the suit and did
not take a decree. The present action, already
stated is by her counsel Mr. Yenni 10 biz bill
for professional services and also the bill assigned TO
him by Mr.. Shannon for professional services in the
application and decree Of divorce as 10 Mr.. H.
Mr.. Yenni appeared in his own behalf, and Mr..
L'Anoreux for Mrs. X. The latter intima,ed that the
claim had been in some oegree settled, and also
pressed q doubt whether judgment in such case
could be taken at all against Mrs. X che being
married woman.
The defense was not fully prepared to proceed; but
Mr. Shannon, who was present az witness, being de-
srOus of leaving the City for day or Two, IL was
agreed bis ies mony should be taken.
Mr. shannon testified 10 the bill be had assigned be-
ing correct. Hs counsel fee in the divorce suit
1iaight agt. Haghtl was sl0Oi attendance to claim
stolen property $40 prosecuting assault and battery
case against Connolly, $50; suit in the Marine Court
900; serving claim a. anst Telegraph slO-being $3.50
in al-s5o, as already stated being paid Mr. > said
the charges were fair. The three latter suits were
since Mrs H. "a last mauiage-the first two by her
directions. The suit in the Marine Court wa before
Judge Mccarthy, against the keeper Of bonding-
house where they boarded for OBTAINING the trunks OF
Mr.. and Mrs. X. The suit against Connolly was az
the Sessions for assault and batteryhe residing next
door 10 the store Of Mrs. r. and entering it upon one
or more occasions and assaultng her about some col
lars. The suit against the Telegraph Company was
for damages ia no. sending on message for Mrs. X.
to Mr.. X. at Philadelphia. Mr.. and Mrs. r. | be-
lieve carried on business together He has called at
my office and expressed himself satisfied that should
take judgment against him for the amount Of my
claim.
Mr. Yenn stated to the Court that he would at the
Iresent stage Of the case, take judgment against
Mr. r. for the amount of NJ. Sbannons claim-as
had been proyed--eaving the case to proceed at
future dey as might be agreed upon for adjournment.
Mr.. l. Amoreaux said he would just soon MIR. Y.
should take judgment against MIR. II. not; indeed
be would prefer that be should; he Mr. A. wa not
there on behalf of Mr. X. Adjourned.
COURT FOR AUGUsT.-Judge Bir2sal will hold
Court throughout the whole of August for the trial of
cases before the Court without Jury.