The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-01-31

those against Vhcm " II made. They II and not
as who violated the principles Of the sssour eompro
mise In l6a8. They 1t WAS and mot u.s. who refused 20
sItsnd thaslins through scquistions lsas
had been done In 1880 through ths acquisition OF
Louisisps, asd In le46 through Texas. they abaa-
donsd the Missouri Compromise and com PEELED
year IL therefore, there i. any blame ior the abandon
nent and supsrssdure Of tina Missouri compromise
them and not upon us rests the 70, possibility Tnsy
new compromise. They are rssponslbs FOR the
qrences thai grew out Of their aston. They aAi
the Northern States the responsibility OF violating the
6rtt, and drove into the necessity Of making second
second compounds having been made Go aitlss
entire fidelity in Ii, fudImsut Of ali its provisions
this be abandoned II to be- violated ii Paao
who violated the Missouri oomprc Mise and not b. those
who sustained that ~ ling as possible observe
Il and then made new one when It could longer DO
Ths simple question before NJ t. whether good faith
ssd fidelity to compsots shall be observed nots IL Ia
It ID not this bill which abandons its principles That
was done BY the ase Of 1885, and the nsesssy for
aon WAS created b the abotisnists In 1S4e. Upon
them then and mot upon rests the odium But true
TO their instact having violated that they wish to
vioats the last compact Violation Of faith reputation
srsIs In their srsscat least It is mauifsssd
IN thsii practics From them We expect nothing moro
All the sboitonats against this Bill and II
peosd they would b. They do not hold themselves under
obligations 10 carry out the promise 1885,
they profsssed to BE- for It, But far different the
The wings ana the dsnosrs srs sis plsdssd to
the principles Of that compromise. Both parties " Bal
tmols rivasd each other the plcisuss Of
anguaee with whtsh they should pledge themselves to
stand By tho principles OF the compromise OF
1850 Every whg in America pledged By hs party creed
pledged BY his party organization TO stand By them
Tbs bill under confederation simply to carry ont pratt
Ssy those :ags Mhish the tso great pars. n.ds st
observed whether is 70 bsvoated BY either or both
4 The two sas parties. I, the sfors, qass,ion Of
n Qmtfn nj hnnr AtkA- ~
which Ne are all pledged shall be carried ont or not
He denied the right Of tbs abolitionists to Arrago
essd.d IN ls4s 10 rsjsstos and de- eating t. rhy had
hunted down with ferccity and IL ng their
.he N ns1 vS M the
supported or sustained the oompromise OF 1880 They
bad sent outnow TO the people Of the United States ths
iy Of tbs Ohio delegates. whsD In fact 1t had bean
signed only y two Senators, and few Representatives
70 IT, n.a IT.
Ated representatives. Of abotiontsm tree sos, nia ger
Ism In the Congress Of the United States Gsntlem
.ots Sut negroes kSsy w:r. Wiling 70 so With them to
iegsats upon property tAxahon and all social rsation
but mould not trust them 70 'ss: for Did
for negroes than white msni He did believe sc.
He regretted that 10 consequence OF the pursued
by the abolition conedsratss In sending forth to the
country their &C nled With isreprs and
slse Statements not osy Of the bill but Of those who
language in the Senate Of tone 80 severe IS he had
done but having now pre- entsd his views be would eavs
the bill 70 the senate and would perhaps hereafter lake
another occasion Of replying to any Questions which
might be made to IT,
As he sat down, "a ven ~ ct various parts Of hi,
Speech there evident manf OF applause In
the galleries and obbie but they promptly checked
BY the officers.
Mr. CHASE said that the Senator had spoken Hs had
fred his gnn They had heard the report they now
in the smoke but far he could had been
hurt They AL survived and he trusted would long sur
vve fuch assaults that Of the Senator Tho Senator
had charged him and his blends With having p, epArsd
their address, somewhere, the Sabbath Tho senator
had seized upon accidental Of dating and uponit
had made charge that he and his friends had vol,
the Sabbath for which day the Senator to
such peculiar respect and yet the Soma him e must
have kpsr that Of date for he had
@ ss ,o sa:s ?. the .ns "a
tended to produce escupon some tender footed mem
bsrs Of Ohio Legislature and therefore had been rep
resented BY its author that It WAS sgaed By maj rty
Of the OHIO delegation. Here too tbs a,nstor ..
,Aun The corresponding soitor OF .hs Tins hsa
his own possibility had stated that It had bsea By
shs Ohio dsleg that editr had not been n
BY HIM (Mr chass), nor could he have basn By
sroEsbs for what b writer's or any one stats Tns,s
the address, Il bore signatures Of those who la,
nc. got there but be had tel T. II. ss pa
psrs telling them not 70 publish Il With aoy ssntoes
b.
II hsc be lnew not Hia colleague oouId say IL it (ths
paIer) bad been presented 70 him.
Mr.. WADE (tss SONY OF Ohio, ssid he had never seen
read the document. A 1t had been made kno By
tie senator from Illinois, he approved oft cordslly and
though. fr had osen presented - him, he would have
81 nee IL.
Mr. CHASE rail- that be did not envy the feeling which
the senator 10 the charge or mo- having
1t to find 1t unfoundsd The Senator had charged
that he had besn srraig0sd by the addrets g.,
truly assured the Senator that In writing that aiiess
tn Senator had not for moment occupied his mind
The Senator alluded to In the postscript bu. oay
be sptbor Of the bill The Senator exaggerated hs
own impor snce-hsd consldersd himself the whole
conmi,'ee and took upon himself al that ives said OF
the MEASURE He knew the anHe ststurs OF the S.ns
so's importance He knew the imnsnse power and in
auenoe the Senator exsrted tbs oountry q. knew
he S nator furrounded here by large and
party, ard he knew The disadvantage undsr which he
latored IN controversy PROVOKED by the Sen Ator He
knew tas ODDS against him. he and the senator
from Massachusetts, STOOD alone. They were in I'm eli
minority They we're bat two in . body Of six y-two
he chaergsi the senator to point Any single iasance
wherein he or re Senator from 10 nal AR
hwrved the side the other vosisg up,n any
measure t. promote the interests Of the country IL
sksd the ssn.r to point to any Instance where bis
had been Influenced for or against any because
Northern Sou shern Slate was to be bsn.Htted by
it. AL that heJ had done 10 deny tbs nationality Of
flAvsJy This was thsir position arm unAltsrabs,
and Cd 1. they we're 10 majority In the senate
He here in the Senate, and before the
county, real med evey word contained In tn 1t address
teDyiDg that 1t had apy inputstion upon motive
calling In question the coarse Of aay individual h
~ulr, AZ proper time, proseei TO answer the argu
the senator and then sxpscts 70
he truth Of tbs positions assumed In that address, In
dong he would not follow f. besAuss II was an exam
pie rot Ct TO be followed He shaphsi the Senators
nsvrg brought this ADDRESS 80 prcminertly forward II
seuld ach and be read By Thousands who would
hA's it Tbs people win IT, and they viii
decide upon It He denounced this BILL because It took
rom the people OF The territory the boon which has been
long secured 70 them BY solemn compact He def
The lsrgugs srd the terms used By address as appro
pEae to the proposition which vouit
territory wLich had teen declared TO 10 forever frse
Ia tnied Eat the C,mprom Of 1850 WAS tu,endsd to
fepssl he corpromse Of 1920 he thought thst usou
examination he authority o. Mssars Webster end Cisy
which he tbs Sen stor, had asserted sastsiaing him
would 10 found vhsy diff rent having then briefly sx
psed tho groundsssress OF tn, charge made against
him By seoaor he would defer till to norrou hi. ar
gulpen' the merits Il the till
Mr.. svnSKr Gee soi) Of Msss.B Before tho Senate I'd.
jopins single moment As of the assigusss
u The ADDRESS referred to by the senator from Illinois,