The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-03-04

bnt on the Chairman OF the Committee 10 show thai
there was . demand Territorial government nov, IL
asttsiPso. & ~ increase Of Popuatca oy smisratiou
for OF the tribes bsyoud Wind Hills and
in the Rocky Nountans There ought to be nfogmsiou
detail Of this policy Of sxssndine the 70 sr
beyond the present limits OF oiviiaAuon There ware
800 scrss 10 these Territories They wsuli sup
port the population OF empire II Was Q uagoif
cent icea to build up an immense empire, ana he
knsw not which most 10 uire the gsrius the bold
dpayed by the setasor in ths ptlon Of and
the pres sing of tbs carry til grand
he thought ths senator from Iioeis hal been aborog
for souue lime uUrer mania for establishing Territorial
governments. This Senator the author of the New
Mexico ana Utah bils and also of Warrington Territory
He had already laid the foundation of three power
content with the siory # being ondt0r 1pr hs Sem
ator was cmulous of the tame of Olari Condior
Imprt0um. He next objeo ion arising out OF
Ind,ns who had b,en carried to this Territory from
Of tte Mississippi had been guaranteed oms to
be surrounaeo b, any To- rtoral gov-rnmsat. he ex
amned the bill ana held that as II stood II
clear, explicit vo alton CT the Indian treaties He
surprseo ,ha, Senators who had dvel the dishonor
OF the viola ion of pixhed faith toward the African
if the Mssou was rep aled had uttered
not one werd in tehal OF keeping pghted fs towars
the Indians The Wiiberooeo OF the senate had word
cfgnpAtby with persons ohsr than those who
Ar Not woo had been uttered by any Of these
phiaptbropsts In favor OF preserving solemn treaties
with the Indians. Amidst all the App,Ah TO honor add
national orecit upon the preservation OF public faith.
made by the OF the partio political sectional
organization there ws no word Of Tenderness for
but for the African No opatranoes had come from
that quarter ainst tho viosou Of faith with tho Ia
diaps-men and srothers equally with the Africans
When vas there tear from the professiousl palAn-
thropist upon OF the Indsn He for
an hour and half the argumens in favor Of end against
tne repeal Of thu vissour prcmHs-whsthsr It's n
peal and the establshneDt Of the ope Of inter
veLtion and popular suffrage would good ults
promised by is friends the evil consequences predict
Cd by Its opponent be could bring himssh to b.iievs
that the passage Of the measure would accomplish the
barpy results expected by its rtend he would abandon
ali his ohj.ctions 20 the bill and vote for 1t chesrfuly
Bat IL he thought II would have the evil results OF
keniDg agitation, violating faith with the Indians and
leaving nothir but the NAKED principle Of non
opponents OF tho bill correct In their expecta
tons Of ts Effects he somewhat unable to say. II
the IF the presented overpowerng
necessity for the passage OF the BILL he would orego a
OF his objections to tbut II that overpo vsrng nscsss
~ did not exist, he WAS not prepared to say that
whether this overpoweng necessity existed In this case
and stated tss considerations both sides In ooncu
sicn, he said he would like to express his views a much
greater length, but time did not allow It,
BILL and in ,eply to Mr. Bells objections to its details
Nr. NoRsIs (dem) Of N. then addressed the Senate
tained that tho compromise so clearly and
unmstsksably estAbshsd the principle Of pterven
on BY Congress with the domestic institutions OF tho
people OF he Territories That principle had beea
eorsed by the whg and democratic csnvsntions and
tIiu nph.Dty sustained BY erwhslmpg majority Of
one, and contsndsd that this one carried out that
principle more definitely than even the scts Of
90 he read from the journal and debates OF
1850 to show that the North repudiatsd refused
and aside the Missouri compromise forced upon
the South the doctrine OF intervention, which the
South opposed but were compelled to submit to. as de
Tended the principle of Intervention BY Congress,
IL hnitey moro WISE just and republican than any geo.
une To attempt to dictate to the people Of
State and say that for ali time to they should have
slavery was unconstitutional and the Of such
IN 40: was equally unconstitutional He referred TO the
O Abolition Sen litd than n
the course Of his remarks he asked the Senator from
Ohio 1hr Chase or from Massachusetts,, (1r somnerO
the Territory free and is Legislature should pasSa
fugitive slave aet would either Of them Aid to execute
Mr. wp ss ,o xns Of Ohio said that !, h
tion. BE Mr wade) had and would never aid in
executing that law or in catchpg slave. Would the
senator from New Hsmpshire aid In cAtching slavesp
Mr.. NoRRs-I have answered that question many
times 1T hcn', end not AFRAID to do here. am
citizen. bound to obseience to I'll the laws Of the
officers OF ths Law 10 them In the discharge Of their
1ss.i leg Quite. wi viii = u d.ty hcusd give them my Aid
for saying that the Nsrth offered this Which
was that Senator and whsrs did he got his authority for
any ast votst BY majority Of her reprssentativssi
Who this Senator who had s led white slaves all
thoae Northern msn who dare do here what they be-
neved the constitution demanded of themS 1t the
same man who, In FAneuil Hall, eounsel,ed the
bed multitude to resist BY force law passed to execute
provision Of the consultation Of the United States
Mr.. SUMNER, Gree soi) OF Aass, (sxcitsdy) y)-Nsvsr,
fOrles, {" ordsrr, "orderp)
Mr. SUMNKR-I challenge the Senator to produce In any
report paper word or line wherein ever oounsesd
violence. The words used in faneu Hall were thsss:-
" counsel no vioIence"
Mr. NoRRs said he might have used strong words but
stronger than the sentiments Of tho Senator required
Mr.. SUMsR-H the Senator says that ever eounseIed
cuoe any report to sustain him. he IL q pauss in the tu
stcn Of who sJs that which he cannot sustain BY
Nr. NORRIS said he thought he could substantially
maintain what he had imputed 10 the Senator he then
commenced upon the course pursued By Mr. Sumner, By
-lotse applause from abohtionists in the galleries
Such conduct, IL bis OWE, he wonld consider too dis
Mr WADn followed, and discussed the coussutionalty
Of the Asouri compremise the truth Of the Declaration
Of nde pendence the injustice Of slavery and tho incon
sisency Of Messrs Dousl., Cass and Others who now
support the BILL He read many extracts from former
Mr. ToucHY, (dsm.) of Conn, spoke from hall past
gument In favor Of the principles CT the bill
Mr. FEsxsDxs (whisJ Of Me-, said that It nov 30
late he would orego his nten ior Of I'D resng the &c.
nate upen this bi BE understood BY the newspapers,
that L.gislAture Of his Stats-a democratic Lsgsa
tuIe-hsd Pssaed, almost un,pimously resolutions in.
the Nebraska BILL BE was FREQ to avow that he WAS op.
posed to slavery In any and every shape 1t presented
would have voted against The .dnssion Of Missouri to
the last unless che prohibited slavery By her oonsitu
ton In ngress in 1860, he would have voted AeAinst
unless the wmot proviso put in the acts Hs then
expressed the sentiments OF the people Of Maine upsn
the question Of labor Honest labor not considered
dirgIaoeul there seemed from Mr. Bro wn's remarks
TO be in Missssipp The labor of any man, matter
how small Its reward, II honest, was more respected
there than any dishonsst aot II rewarded BY the
highest office In the gift of the people Of the
United states. he then entered in,o history Of ths
policy Of the nation ~ith slavery Be
contended that the constitution gave the slave States
great ntages tho free States and the North
Interested deeply In dining 1t to it, PR sent limits In
every contest between the free aud slave Sta the North
had always been forced to YIELD He gave history Of
the Mics uIi act, maintaining that It WAS compact
that the South had received her share fully, and the
North refused to execute hsr part Of the agree
ment Spos the Missouri Ave slave States had been
admitted with ont objection In thu compromise OF 1850
the sonth rot tho privilege OF taking slavery