New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-13

Frrra.Av., NEw YoRk. Oct 10, 1854.

FIFrdAy., NEv YORK Oct 10, 1854
DrlR SIR You have called article 10 THE
TRrEuSE OF this signed Pafmy. However uu~d
linz be appear again before the pabc in discussion
Of little % cannot refuse the oeneht OF my
t..mony when verseity bitterly assaied must
therefor. deny in the most positive manner that 1t vas ever
proposed ~ that the matter In dispute should DE- referred 70
The sust Al Instruments, that 1t was mani
ous ssed that thu whole 'hGqd be Trerred to Dr. Carno
CHI y ard that his decision should be hnal.
have in smother P'ee snd a. considerable length denied
by the evidence OF an impartial witness who fo,tu
nsey for the Of truth hsppesed to be present o what
bs WIN il wa, ursed upn ma in nv capacity of Chairman
and Reporter Jury that should ake it upon my'elf to
not ssr,ed finally reluctantly assented the CONDITION
that load be liberty TO consult the memoer OF the Com
permission awarded Dr. Carnochan entered the room upon
which said Here b. of them. aud will place the
rntsr Instantly believe thai other words the
subject ssd 6et~een DR. Csrnoeh.n sod my'e in The p'
Can oehsn very brief Ii delayed by private
ytr.ai with the Chairman Of the committee 90 oenu'ry,
have recollection Of anything positive that then occurred
except inquiry part IN relation 10 your
own standing in your prof,s5n and complimentary
ply bis had BY this time made no my nigd my n9ur-
is in relation to your kil satisfactorily answered to
sds u your port sdon that NJ the majority and
have been TO my own suong impression IN avor OF ms
hs eh DR. lsTnocbsn with the decided belief that
be ecrtunsd with in this pnion This impression vas
my ,hs, acted noon h for after seeing DE-
opinion prot sionsi staining acted uoon IL By draw
IN, my without consulting any other member OF the
Committee surries instruments WIN tai. report ~s
about days .tsrsds for the Crystal Palace,
when received letter Dr tafnochan
thar more than single Hce should he added the Re-
FORT the majority. Ny report modified 10 conformity to
HE and the letter itself nelosed with my
rep,ft O the Com mis-ioners Of Jnfies.
Now resdily dentsnd how Dr. Carnoehsn who had
heard part the discussion IN the jury might
with who h-d present. have been in
due, ibnh that he bar been na'd umpire and that my
banding him the conu'ed him such But am posi-
that the word umpire not much as bre4h-d 10 any
Communication him. either beo-e the Committee or In p
think thsi 10 bis Letter he assumed Ia st
capacity, bot that letter doubt fe 81 the Crystal
Palace sill speak for itself Between his statement snd
mine. therefore. there Is yet discrepancy With Dr.
Psrmly, however unfortunately At direct sne Tor can
I'd how b. should haze soten that he whole
le entirely fret indeed your pOpO
soD sssented By the memb bat serssrd the
urgeey OF both Dr. Trenor and himself Nor uu
derspd how mission TO consult with the members OF the
Surgical Instruments impOsing obgat
How ask their advice should have
,ueo n hs In alton into the appointment OF mJre
o.ly etbe this orseuness the Of excite
which be appeared be and which break
Up the in disorder IL spoozize for this that Dr.
Treroi followed from the jury AID only say
thai obvious that any cool discussion q the point 10 die
Juie To.ble and that attempt reconcile the
fietDs opinions would have been unsysiling
Yours sincerely, JAS RESWlCK.
To Dr. {. G. ALLEN.