New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-03-08
La " INTELLIGENCE.
SUPREME coURT-speeisl Term

RIGHTS HUSBANDS AND MARRIED wONEN.
Charles Benedict and Wife wism Seymour al others
Psrtiton-
koosksLLr, case 81 s a,n u s
bsad and sale ssted for inst ed Of an .easl Ps
f.ni, IS married Be afee cd the questions
themselves to the mind Court demand the mors
Tbs eoarss Of the plaintiffs take for s.nsd the
men are sill subject their disabilities and married
entitled their ancient rreOaves In both aspects ta 'a
5, s s for the better seeming Of r.. interest:
provided that une they hOs to execute esss, g ihe
portion Of the proceeds pad the
Gear should ses hest :. secure .s rfss ' ns,s
when release could be Obtained from the we was to pay the
81 he ~ 1875 's 20 r the
the rsh Of .isd omen such Peoo: were " sascs declares
the footing single females and With the sam, power OF
sTsded to hem e ssy onssi paid WAY
words 3 aid =. OF the City without their request be
Money aid TO married formerly her hu.s,n.
property cor subject her husbands dpOs,' liable sor
his debts" His legal eostIol over Is sons3.nd % Snaas
il .er,h Of iod . 10 Feed pro setop s.a, the
wise impaired BY her promise TO obey and .un-s that she
can say No quie Is Freely aud quite e ensr;c' ate,
q 10 indicates on this Pon, some sisst mssvins sat P,o,s
t,h.i no; b. dehssed even on her written request, unless,
Justice Of the Court ser dle examination aud in 'y
sh s deu thu sssoas not very dressed
the lady to manage sni control" But this Qualification
fined aeul, trusts and bearing on the present only
Of ut.eeunt statute passed on the h Of June 1851 gives
@ ne ib 10 VOTE AZ soy elect on for directors or
tu,tee .nd this without eOunens either their husbands or
Alter unsqavoea legislative Indications, would
Law presumption and (anle.. he contrary expressly
Ro.ss thu. every married Woman Of a nee ss.
Next what has been called the eussy estate hn.o.n
stey the msase except where wy stsed qpon
ssS o 10 S snrn ii. own life
The Act ofi while it tbs married her common
w a. 81 ss his s% as
oeuIte in that Of b. wife A, marriage wa.,svst may De u,
the existing marriages and *
sIoCnd Heonsatona vod White White Barb "a
As to sutstqasn mai1s.s ana n 20
be said Of It's justice cannot b. dputsd Hence the pc
stating the dates when the union between shs parties vas
ont tses esrstts Il !. mpssibl, Tor the Cont to dermaess
they called upon to dothe rGns ohe parties Add even when
to. husband seysnd ,Ion .ni Of
o,.oosss of.ns born With u. the estate r the sasSaad
ow1e without issue II e,tepd beyond his Ts lsvaas
nBui arc survive p bSt upon TIE jac and npne
pf ss DOVER 6 Wife NE Cws 's % ~
take. only the condition Of widow after her ha
The greater lib likelihood Of Issue In any given case mast de-
sa Gy0 rs. not S' and n Pss po sa
into consideration by the law One extreme case
enlistment estate tail ster Feasibility Of 's,s . s' ~
eOs11sd he,d Of the ancient n Ha then ia
Other AZ iuehoae tenancy by the courtesy 70 he vaued
In substitute Tor the prooaoe
proepe etiye income, is to be allowed
On this points suggested ~h 10 hesr the COUNSEL fo
the adopns the draft decrees which have been sub
uted In this aud come other cases
Judgment pended Accordingly
DECISIONS.
George Wotherspocn agt. The Rector, &c. OF Christ
Jobn mcIp,rs az, Hslsey Roger, .-Bond and
stsnd pleiu It'd 70 have o change security. &c
Ethan PIat-Pa Of TO be amended
loser Ludum Charles V. Ludum -Deposons
uvst lie signed BY the parties &c
SUPREME CoURT-IS CHAnBERs-Bsfo'e Jldgs ROOSEVELT.
CORPUS.
On the al pcation OF James Brown to be discharged
chip North Carolina In which he is alleged 70 have
Illegally detained This referred 20 few days sncs
ss1 yesterday brown alleges that he arrested b,a
Ia June last deserter under tle
ri kept prison week then placed schooner with
others Pensacola where he placed on board the
he stated he captain OF the that
that he had enlisted In the sad
Columbia but they told him he
with the othes and that h refused Tn
placed irons that s.r the
Colombia arrived e. New York be was tried BY Court Niri
Lee charge of attempting to desert he having amped
rbolfd schooner New Orleans he then arn stated
lee and the description OF
who enlisted Orleans and deserted did not
lie fousd guilty the chsss OF attempt to
sentenced b. psoned for thirty OF the
breed AID thst he accordingly placed Ia
irors till brought out on this bzbeas corpus $50
considered hst there had evidently been mistake
The bad always refused TO the name Of James Lee
which he held the description OF Lee did not
fol him. He discharged.