New-York daily tribune., 1854-07-11
LAW LNTLZLIGENCE.
COURT or COMMON PLEAS-GEvERAL TEsN-Befors JUDGES
INGR,H,N and WOODRUFF.

Ilnrre stenm Naysalion Companv asi q. Yonng.

DECISIONS
Ifnvre Steam Navigation Company as'. T. Young
IyGRaH,N. J.--The assignee OF bill Of ladng - liable
for the freight of the goods received by hum Where ue
goods sent 10 public warehouse and the bill OF ial.
ing was afterwad assigned to the defendant ON general
orccr and he received the same assignee held that he
was ube for the freight Judgment affirmed with costs.
As Beebc plaintiff and respondent ag Edward Roberts defend
IvcR,H,w, J.-Where defendant appears on the re:
turn day and fails to nppearon the adjourned
day he is entitled 10 have the default opened either,
3t6iE CotiOn OF the code.
Forgetting the day Of trial not sufficient excuse to
Oyen default.
tender of the deed sufficient compliance with the con-
dons and the acceptance by the defendant not neceS
sory. Judgment affirmed with costs
Order appealed from modified to correct mistakes
in the case &C. No costs
Elizabeth Gray sdmx, Sc q Eeenetu Gray deeea'ef as
Action commenced by Mr. Gray, in his lifetime, in
las to from the defendant bill OF goods alleged
10 have been sold being stock Of parasols &c, at No.
Celar-st. which had come into The hands Of Mr. Gray.
ON the last trial Of the case verdict was gwen Tor
plaintiff Of 50 223 - and motion II made for new ral
The Court said whatever may be our individual opinion
A. to the right Of plaintiff TO recovery IN this case we
feel bound to yield those opinions to the views expressed
y the Judges of the Court Appeals on the argument in
which they reversed the nonsut granted on the rs trial.
Motion for new trial denied, with costs.
SUPREME COURr-GsSER, rrRw-Befo-e judges MlrcaELL,
ROOSEVELT ard CLEsgE.
rb American Trust Co. second Half Mloa Try.t Leaylt re.
eeivsr sgt. Graham, Biatchford aud Others.
Trust made in l-ip, secured by real estate,
o secure Ia the Gerard and United States Banks Pha
depha 100000. The Court considers on the rule lad
down in the decisions the million and first halt million
trust that the facts 10 this do not differ sufficient from
them to authorize different decision, and that the trust
was valid. Bill dismissed with COSTS
Tracy agt. Yates.New trel granted, costs to abide
event.
Same sgt Rodmen.-Sarne.
Carpenter. &c. agt. Reconnaissance.
Rarkn agt. De Forest.-Judgment at Special Tenn IN
favor OF defendant affirmed, with costs.
LIABILITIES OF sToC EHOLDERs ~ THE GENERAL LAW
IycORPoRATED COMPANIES.
Samuel r Tracy ss,ins, Ann E. Ys;e,
Mrs. Y was sued as stockholer having held 5000
stock in the New-iOrk Steam Faucet Manufacturing
Company an insovent company, which had been esab-
shed under the general law to recover debt due to the
plaintiff by said company. verdict was gwen against
Mrs. Yates for -, 600, and appeal is made
The Cont considered that 3rs Yates was not stock
holder the time when the debt Contracted and she
is therefore liable sheIs not TO pay the Coar. consd-
cred either in equity by the statute, she has not only
.paid up her shares in full Judgesooevelt, in Civ
ing the opinion OF the Court, suggested, thus loosng
ber whole 50 OO0 but is called upon TO pay 5000
more and that on account OF what she cOnceyes to be-
.and on the trial offered prove to be, swinde
'contryed by the geers up Of the corporation The
remedy of the creditors should be against those who got
up the concern New trial granted. Costs to abide
event.
Rankin .st. De Forrest and Chi.endsr.
Plaintiff in selling the goods elected to sell them H.
: Chittenden and TO the deendans-ani they there
fore TOOK the risk and looked him alone and charged
the goods 10 him Judgment at special term in favor of
defendants affirmed, with costs.
wIDESIyG OF WALKER ASD EXTENSION OF cssAL->T..
Judge Watson not having arrived in town. the decision
in this case the appeal rendered yesterday
forenoon. and the Court announced will meet again
in three weeks for the purpose of decision Judge Rose
welt stated that he has discovered that his brother
come property west end OF Canas but is not en- OBJ
ecor and does not whether the Improvement takes
place not Having maie the discovery as to said
er,hp Of his brother he states 20 counsel who will think
whether not it Is proper point for an objection. Mr.
the moment to say whether it constitutes interest the
part Of the Judge TO ncapactate him from acting on
the or not. The matter lies over to 3lst inst.
L. 2. CIRCUIT COURT-Before Judge BETTa
SENTENCE. a,