New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-12-13
NEW YORK DAILY TRIBUNE WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 49, 1854

but wait for further evidence. Oar correspond
ent was probably not aware sh,t in Boston tie
Lew party have just reelected 70 the office Of
Nsyor smsn who was nos. officious in the work
Of sending Bufns back to boni sge, aud Sn) is no
toriou, for ayoriDg the policy Of mot agisssing
",eetionsl questions." This vas done In fall
kDosledee Of the facts, no ele;tor who gave DIS
outrage for Smith could have been ignorant thm
he gss doing the beat service he could render to
The uen engaged in establishing Slavery in Kan
sa, by the sovereignty OF DO vie knives revOlyers,
and voters imported from Missouri. After thi'it
is impossible to deny that the Kno g-NOthing, oil
Boston are as much the friends Of the slave
drivers as those Of Ne@.York I. is true that in
Worcester Msyor said to be of another stamp
has received the support Of the Order; but Ias
Amerieon Organ tells Us that these apparent
alterations in favor of Freedom are but the efsct
Of Old habits that cannot at once be eradicatet.
This same national organ Of the Oder soemaly
assures US also that "the question Of slavery is
"not to be discussed" that the American party
is formed son the basis Of sinking the question
"of slavery forever" and that sin the eon.un-
"mation of the present revolution, the men OF
New England, like their sires in the Revolution
"of 76, will stand by their brethren OF the South
"ss eo-uorksrs in a common cause" Is net this
evidence enough that the new party is pro-
slavery party
4. The first man in Congress to bring forward
that great American measure, the reform of
the naturalization laws, was Senator Adams of
Mississippi, and one of the reasons urged ia his
speech was that foreigners ranged themselves
with sbolitionisn. The proposed change is
required according to Mr.. Adams, 10 order to
avert the growth of that party in the free States
which il opposed to the extension Of Slavery and
the domination Of the slave power. lt is also
required, we will add, in order to avert the
growth of the free States Themselves in pOpula'
tion, wealth and power. No migrants, com
paratvely, resort to tue slave States and by stop
ping immigration it is supposed thai the unplea''
ant superiority Of the free States in the elements
Of national strength and respectability will be
checked. Hence the favor with which the neF
party is received at the South, where the indica'
tions seem to be that il will absorb the Whigr
and even break down the Democracy in may, if
not most of the States Wherever there's Slavery
we must naturally look for the same readiness to
exclude Foreigners, which was manifested BY
Southern men in the passage Of the Nebraska
bill, and which Mr.. Adams now hssteas to ex-
hibit anew. II is true that the great body of
foreigners in the country have not hitherto ju'ti-
fed this hostility of the slave olgarcby, tina!
institution having had no more ze.lous supporters
at the polls than the mass of Irish and German
blcckbeads; but the Germans especially are be-
ginning to distinguish between real and sham
Democracy and Mr.. Adams will do well to keep
them out if be can.
The Native American party intends to elect the
next President. For that purpose /! has placed
itsef on pro-savery ground. The attempt is
not Iovel one, and has not always succeeded.
We shall see bow it comes out now.