New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-06

fc-Esr' ard addressed the meeting. H. deno1n 81 me
Mine Lsw ssoTyressive, snd said n Il US ope,aton
would rob the Of one-,nirr Ut their estates and
v.covs fud or, hsrs into ahject poverty tie t'u' "a
flsifbe hour would come when these schlsms Solii
lie betled and he heliey Il that This was ue IN Ios
il b. healed. He believed that seS molr ecuid u1V
n mfjoriy Of $50 in The City OF NeT-lofS' aND
u eeo them 10 ,sbor for that result
DAVID A WRIGHT then made speech consrash-
la;ing the meeting on the unanimiiy and enthusiasm
which prevailed in the Syracuse Conveniion- lie con-
sidered the action of that Convention 81 wise and
proper, and mentioned his considerable pat OF tue
r.riorrnanco While VI nav icrrecote the introdrc
lion of thc measure may also n oce tl,l thc pm
cirle il rccog iLes c-fab lib. IN tn territories. nc
r. u arked that MIR. nelavsa, the President OF Tue
State Temperance Society 81 TIE time u the veto. r.
know led I'd that Gov. Seymour ed from prircipl,
For ihi- he most violently attacked Ivy the NV.
YORK TRIBUST, and shamefnlly abused by thaf ano
other il strumen's Of Aholionism and Maine LAVISH
AfteT some further remarks this speaker closed by eH
messing his belief tina. the Democratic party was
'stourd 10 wiz. Which was greeted With cheers and
yell-.
ese5ed in a rather di.connectes manner 10 speak
again, ,be Maine Law aud the PRESS. He aso ap-
rToy ed of the act of Capt. Hoilins GI Greytown.
M /. PiyyEr then addressed the meeting, bu,
be VS. laborinc rnders severe cold and consequently
biz s1eech was rather short. IL characterized the
VIII party as fusion of all the sns OF the day. and
said their candidates had been fishing nook
.rd corner OF the State to get Conventions OF all
kinds and colors io adopt them as tneir cnamPlous
and invariably chspged their principles t. suit those
whom thew wished 10 eutTap. He reviewed the con-
duct Of the Wing candidate for Lieutenant Governor
in first sDstarr Governor Seymour veto, and then
con inc ont and stating thar he WIS IN favor OF pro
Libitofy law. He had heard greut many Of botl
parties saw that they would vote for Seymour ana
RAYMOND at FIST because their rights would be pre-
served: Int he would ask them what they would 10
row Would they vote for man who would deprive
them of their dearest rigbts Ii this law passed. we
sloud have the Grabsntes asking the Legislature 10
NESS y law that nOn. but Graham bTea1 shou a De
u,ed md they would have inst a. much right 10 leg,-
lat on ore subiec, the other. If snch law IA ID
10 nsss a. we NAV also make laws in regard 10 how
much nan shall eat and also wha religion he shall
rofes Such laws he said struck nj the root OF civil
nnd religious liberty, aud no, for one, would vote to
ureseivc his rights 10 spite of the sneers OF hls OPP
rorenis WHO characterized Ill who opposed the law
ruDmies.
Mr. A X. MAYyARD next addressed the meeting.
He said that this was the first time for about ali a
century tba. the rights Of the people had been men,
coed, and trusted that the attempt would meet with
the success which one of like nature received IN
the time OF the elder Adams, who, with clique OF
supporters, attempted TO suppress free speech ana
The freedom Of the press bat which they faIed 70
carry oct After few further remarks, he said that
they mis ht probably meet with defeat but they must
ItrseveIe and they sure TO succeed IN the end
and ben they did succeed then let their opponents
beware for they would sweep everything before them
No more speakers being on hand, the meeting ad-
;ourncd AZ lOl o'clock.