Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1852-1859, 1854-11-08

TII71lI Co1Fi- -i1IToelioa CO.

N Alp e.elns pt fof ~ leitdt4 wee Opened by
JUDE AeRnon, Who tpoks ct m5io than Two hoart
OF Moray ovtnlhSl Upon The general legol pro.
politinl involved 10 itia cause, he addressed
hin,oll ptIlianlafg o 40 construction Of The Law
Of Meleh. letIY1na he tonluelof July Gu, i9tJ
phoo % olUuea a. length utie Identical Ga lhHf
mganlnS, apd mat Tie contact meant bolhlul
,PpEpef lef lhindld the dpoftsth &c then
6ddteiled hlhsef % The dillntslbhoi lhe, aliega!
alton p iho lalt hat lhs proposed Eolt d Ben.
wood NaB an obaloellca l5lhs naygatioh OF ne
ohlp RlteE He argued thstan pafly, 70 s6Iitlo
itself to relief fiom such an obstruction 81 court
ofiequ',ys uuui alsSo cad ploVo oeiual inluI5irom
such eoh1tIueilon, ana that :tn inlay now % Be
el'npspiAled y damast' AMER arguing Other
propositions a length, aud ssyetbl hils aiiho 'les-
tspsd algnlly 81 The ely 81 Whsehng," q term
USED n The bilIl be concluded. We regret that
Oihtt ongagemsnll prevented Ne from doing Jus.
lice q tho lucid Argument Of Judge KounOn,
which W. have hset lils alluded 70 very yusue
ant incQmpfehenslye terms. The court thea ad-
jouTaed 70 3 O'Clock on Tuesday.
Tuesday morning, The augment was contn,
ned iol he defendants by 90. AadreW Hunter, Of
Jefferson, The regular council Of The Baltimore
and Ohio Rsiltoad, IN Virginia. We eau give
merely anoutline Of bis temnrks moi hoping to 90
common iutliee even 70 bis sl0bOtoleand able Of.
gumsnt &c commenced BY abiding 10 tie course
Of the counsel iuF The city not opening the case
fOI the city byGgumsht, and gave tho TsusOuswhY
the counsel for The company declined to Ole their
answer D, this Slhga Of The proceedings He then
- - III
Gled, rather differently from bis co.couhssl, we
ihooGhil thhttho cOaiI6el letseasl EolsI than in'
eIeoued The rights Of Tire city Of Wheeling, that II
wa ASalfshdet Of r6,Lts which she had uhderthe
law Of lstT, and that he clause ~ being the To-.
ionton Of the parties loihiJ conlIsct among other
lhingp to secure 10 jbe ely Of Wheeipgihe Prae
iicdibenthls Of the western TERMINUS Of The Balli
nore ana Ohio Railtoad, was INTENDED % explain.
atory. merely Of the general concessions Of the
CITY in that contract, end that was bad gtamlnut
ifpiaosd IL another position, HeaTsued atlenglh
TO show the general poWsts Of corporations TO
make connections branches, &ea undeE The 40. Of
1891, The act ofls41, and The Law Of July ist,
1850.
de argued 10 show lhotthe pteseht application
was ilriuased on The psTl Of Wheeling, as her
pusitieh ''aS The hub of system Of railroads "a.
dlaling ftom her as center, eonstilulsdhor dc.
lrpce dgppsl tie injurious efscls Of the piesenl
act Of the Baltimore and OHIO RailEoaI Company.
He orgued that under lhs law The RaiirOad had
theIigat 70 make LIsaehet, and 70 lake up freight
aud passengers al oil points, and that they had not
lieiled (hisrisht BY any sdbSequenlScl. That the
court bed no csSs whatever before L for tho in
junction prayed lot, and he confidently trusted
lhatthsibidncdon would be promptly refused BY
the opurl. Atabouti9 O'Clock 10 concluded his
argument. o6p or The most able ever delivered in
our, Court House, and one which did credit 10 It's
author, ana We think mole than justice to tile
slipPeiy eoTPOiotiOn which DO represents before
the oouH, We are slsdto soN however, not in
Hind. We sketch this from memory merely, aud
Of couIsb lmPstlectly. Althe close Of bis aIsu-
menl ME. Russell commenced the reply ior The
city, odd Wa speaking u late hour on yestst
day We shell alIud9 to hp fsmatks In our next.
M HanieI viii piobablyfeply tObiS prsumenl,
and II %, MI Russell will Of couite Eejoin, II
%, ihs case may not b. closed i'll noon today.
The nsSt oese win be onelof the railroad cases,
saltf W soHheolSu 70, the Company almilaE to
the LhGeHy ooas decided last term. The Court
HopHs wee Crowded during Yesterday byouF cid
ksno, aho deostedly unaffected their interest In
The hearing tihls case, SoiimpOIlaRt 10 The city
u wS dbnobiaia H. WsVIll publish tie opinion
o. the court when delivered, % will doubtless Ie
sabptnls, Rhaleysr the result.