New-York daily tribune., 1854-05-12

ess in such certificates. viii inseres, h,r'ca. At sae
Ash sHesesns aye ~ Pss sss ss. s.,s ne san ah Of s
~siu'r' = the entire bill, emitting only the nano
-he" claimants; and our readers can Sc
oi most u '> does not provide for the sppr'ise
"he'AeI II uo'' y ell as damages By reasOn Of th'
men' 'i oenCH's aS IL which Messrs. Kempshall
oSn@'s' iN's 20. he Legislature, sud cam
L9 ~, 'uv'",'' -. ~, ough the Legislature
True, it was somewhat modified -. -,
it passed that branch (72 to 22;) but', ;,a,.
of Messrs. Kcmpsha, Ely & Co.. who, - -.
of what the Legislature should do are embo>
original bill, as quoted above. -,
We have tried TO obtain the bill as it finally p,>
the House, but have thus far been disappointed W.
believe the principle of sided estimate was not
overruled BY the amendments. And to show that our
objections (Which had conceivable sinister impulse
as we did not know who the elaimants) we're not
singular nor baseless, submit the following ex-
tracts from the remarks in opposition 10 the bill of the
Hon. F. A. Conkling. most intelligent, capable and
faithful Member from this City:
Sir the proposition present form msuey
unourd ard onedsd that would fH hope th. Committee win
rsue reflect that will afefu serune ee 'ee ana me
I,e ee1 w0hs' '''-'A bill n u'a 'A'' before '''' Is
& there truth connected with the LEGALITY in which the scene
unusually s.r gard them The City Of Rochester has
ne CIV Of Rochester and il, neshborbood destined indefinitely
IN & 5e ioe whh the sste sustained at the hands
counted almost by millions long before the Erie Canal was
HE pck which nature ssked and graded for tbs, canal ran
selected srd ssd upon BY authors Of that work
woud carried r from the homes aud the Interests OF these
Mr. c here dwell; length upon the O5nsly
of he which would for the detection
% es and S G Sosd Il. iS' n d 3 S
loss constantly sustained BY all engaged in the nsvan OF the Ee
els ioekToIt lie had
being Jrouht 70 hcT doors transaction. Sac sold he
oss Tor the profit and she did no., wise Wisely y - h ,,.m.r,
submitted nor in he srsumen, Of the cgeSs' can shy s,s %
i believe I'm safe in saying wihn two hundred aol na dollars
other been able give the subject has put
q e' Oeas a90H M ias question % . OF sO ssiu5 o. rs ,
In the next place Sir tbs bl admits and will hereafter be
parroe maintaining that the gentlemen therein
named end all hoe who hereafter sep INTO heI places has
STATE uron which he awards now contemplated Gre bu an install
thing open tor repetition again and again Tor al taaF'
expres, the LEGISLATURE sds to preudss all qee,
lions and 10 decide them IN favor o. me ca 'po ~
ehf pntes corporations representatives, ana sl s ony e
% N, s 10 ~ eson Of the diversion Of
1bsi al these rare. damnd during these year. he
bill Is made 10 .eie concusyey determines aud then with
eonaar tue ayessa,Ga 70 ANY sosPGa & pPs % M Cana Az
dreeisd to say how much tes 1se & n o.
from sch diversion Amer reading carefully an elaborate
submitted OF me
Cana Arissr, Mr. ell Cayuga County and other IN
believe that each and ot ihese ca
all by Of the Canals On the
Contrary think gentleman who reads Mr tornwets report
will m from It's impressed with the belief that some OF He
who appear petitioners have been great gamers ~ point
II there other
~ ,ddicate absolutely advance that Of these hy
ht individuals each las valid claim upon the sae i0t u@
go -, A. . ..,u.,, o., al vbo
will keen Up show manufacturing or OF mining whth hee
~ no facilities with the direct and eN
psciaon the State, the shape OF damages all
that will inceasing In the a essr
age. profits long the state does not o
iuso.ytnt'
We might pile proof upon proof of the injustice
and dangerous character of this Rochester caim but
who needs it Let it be sanctioned, and we may bid
a long farewell to the Canal Enlargement, and never
again hope to the bottom of our State Treasury
covered. But we do not think it can be carried.