The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1854-01-24

49,
comproaiss Of 1850 The enan made Ia ine 70 sss
s the qaesuon by scaeri4lx Coo psonss H.
IA y allied Tho sssiesasat nasly xS.As .
qlnrple Of compromise. The esass In sosuovsssy csas
1ss essential lag redient ia ha lsozss Wa
eai compromises merely ended spsAy ssuisory
4 uiah sAd New Mexico Was Il insesasd 10 b : nnai
etlemenl 81 the sasery agitation la whal d,A
1sa n.sn who participated IN thai ssstsmsns yssAgs
Asif taish 10 abide ~ ss14ns Ma naasss4y 49,
poFsy adjustment. naai sstiexns1,i La wAs1
'snss ala TIE aeaoeate patty unise ~ Bxitsxs psas
as s iaiL 70 adhere .biae By Cosapsoaiss II
ieSu and 10 resist all alhsr agitation slavery Quesr
on ~hef1r 40 Congress OF Was tkas
Intended 10 be temporary AID partial pssp~<ual SD
universal The Nebraska bill os tbs vtiocau. f
he Conpronse Of 1850 IL leaves people Il ts Tsxsi-
ory unramnsled by congressional a.
nounoes 10 them the principle OF selxossnrnena
when they ask admission STATE" asta
The Journal Of Commerce. in commenting upon lAsss
remarks OF ours, said
There is escaping from the reasoning Of the Union
when II that II Mr. Douglass ban violates The Mo
souri, Com PROMISE equally 50 did the Compounds OF I6Go
which applied exactly the clause portion Of
Louisiana territory which Is proposed 70 be applied
10 The remainder q under the Of Nebrasks Tbs
crime. II II be has already committed In kind
thoneh not In degree. The Unions idea appears h.
ha Inc Compronise of 1850 mod hcation Of the ME-
sour Com promise by the power that enacted it--
ny The two houses Of Congress, sanctioned by the Exsca
tive and thus, thar what remained nnnihed oil tbs Mis-
1880 which intended. and be received - $50
seiiiemsnt OF the slavery dissensionaA
bul whist our own construction of the Compromise Il
$780, and OF s principles applied the NsArasha III.
| rendered the Missouri Compromise inoperative. M
opened the territory to immigration. unsabarrAssed by
Tie restrictions OF that Compromise and whilst we aaw
that our contemporaries generally concaed in this con-
struction yet there some disposed to doubt on
Inc subject We expressed our willingness to see al
doubt removed. On ihls subject said nsad
The bin reported by Mr. Douglas challenges the sap
port OF every democrat ground
enaos FIND reaiirns the principles the Compromise
u iooo IL assumes that that Compromise designed
70 be final and permanent in its operation. II assumcs
Whit cannot be that great principles of
me Com promise of 1885, far question Of slavery
territories involved, the recognition Of ths
doctrine of congressional non-nteTyention. This prnc
pie necessarily leaves the question the decision Of those
inhabing the territory and necessarily IN
citizens the right to cmigrae such territory
their rights, whether OF properly. nnsbas
rassed by congrcssrnal prohibtons This
being the effective and vital principle Of Compromise
Of 1885, must be apparent that its Introduction Into the
Nebraska bill is no more than giving permanency and
perpeiuation that Compromise We understand this
| principle be Incorporated into Mr.. Donyas's bin,
| and because have understood it have given
to 1t d ready and cordial support. But If there can
| be doubt raised this point, it is due ths mo-
Of the THAI such doubt shA -
removed TINS be done STRICT accordance with the
Com Of 1850 and is the ground that the prn-
cipes of that Compromise be that
for miscons should be left BY the CSmprc-
mise of 1850 Territories OF Utah and New Mexico
free and open emigration. and the rights of psrson
aud ,per subject only to the restrictions and ii
taons posed by constitution OF the United Ssss
and the giving TO these Terrnorss Ths
provision made in Mr. Douglass bill for Neb aaka
Or il is doubnl whether provision made,
every democrat VIII readily that faithful adhs
C,npromse 1851 req thai should -
made. The staad firmly unitsd upoa ~
4 M rule softn kv "A,
we avoid tue agitation which enemies willing
onent On this gronnd believe their hopes Of sowing
d,seord and dssension in ranks viii be sgnay
1 disappointed" 4s
The amendment proposed by Mr.. Douglas on yestsr-
day was Intended 10 ali io doubt 10 The
true msaang and ,eraion Of The Compromise of 1852
IL declares thsis by the principles II sAst Conpsoas.
the Missouri Compromise was superseded, and shsss-
FORE that the Of those principles in the Ne
brsska bill readers the Missouri Compromise aops-
raiive- IL is designed. therefore, carry out in coed
faith Inc principles Of The Compromise Of 1859; and =
sueh it canno. fail to command Inc sappon OF al ds.e-,
cEats ~ho standing faithfully sad sincerely spoc fAe
Compromise OF 1880 fnsl and permanent ssslsDsnt
OF the slavery question. We regard the poll
CIV Of the administration directly involved thu quss-
hon That policy looks fidelity the Cempronise al
1850 essential requisite democratic orthodoxy
The proposition OF Mr. Douglas i. practical execution
OF the principles OF that Compromise, and therefore
not bat be regarded BY the administration ie~t Of
democratic orthodoxy. The union Of the democracy
this proposition will disspaie forever the charges Of rse-
soil mpsihies reckessy and pertuaciousy asUsd
agans, the administration by wing opponents; wAaaa
At will take from dlsa6ection ia ranks The lat
vestge of rxe,ext for It's opposition.
The NebrAska Delegate. as
As the subject OF Nebraska is attracting much Of The
pusc attention. ii not be amss for express the
Qualification have derived in The acqusinaaos Of The
Hon Thomas johnson. the delegate 70 ConSzsas from