Anti-slavery bugle. [volume] (New-Lisbon, Ohio) 1845-1861, 1854-06-17
CONGRESSIONAL.


.,
IhE MAsniNcToN NioN ANp TnE AN1ESLhVEhf
Mis- ~ CuNGurss On tie Sth inst. Mr. Gildings.
as II rriyicgcJ question. Br,usLt To- tLe attention
" 'o'e"' '"0
" ''o itouSe Oh hepreaeniau,t'' ''e insulting ana
threatening language ui tue Washington MON, IN
reference to Messrs. Smith, Gidlings and others.
The editor of ihat poncr was the prirter 10 the
tIopso ora ,1,,,o, - ,1,i IA
4 ""N nus 0"' VI 40 o'"'ei'' ,'o "0u'u i,"V
an extract as a specimen Of what 1t had published
Tor the last ten days. The extract read is as fol-
4 follows
II ar,
=" 1n' W.ru proloeuon ana obedience are re-
~ ,;,; ai 9nu i9sePafa,,"' ana tn9sc VINO i'he tue
apoiilio" HlV,hU'aflca, smith, u!uainS5 ana oshGrs
He Hre ihcessantIy procaiming their hostility to the
"s H"s ana tue C9ISutution' and SVmulatinE men,
women ana children TO revolt as q sacred duty
III our OPINION they have no claim to the protection
.. 'n9se Jaws or that Constitution They arc the
- W Sc1i''.h Ni'ience ana mnfecr' 'heS uIc
iihe ana snould be treated rs wii beasts 81 re
rHcs'S' i'}S' hhoWlhg no law oi restraint but ueiF
! WIN un9o'e'hlble instincts, and like dastardly
%mlGnSHl % Pr9Wicrs alter firing the train, sneak to
ther holes leaving their wrctcled dupes to become
tie victims OF the acts which they themselves
nave nave SunuI"i%i' Is there no law that can reach
u ucSc lG"MG'y inccn"iariss' who after throwing
~ h'e pI"1u' skuS away IN '"rNhes. to ehJoy the
p'a"e' AHH are these who, on the floor OF both
no"SeS y, Nu.gfcNS' openly declare their disahec
f. = ''''N''' my H"'S sN"'H " SUI Il'.t :
''iI n naintah' worthy oi scat In the sacred Hall
IL i'sla!u'o"' wheh any act should emehate from
u.. source lueae are questions lhat must be
, n"e,e m" e,eu sooner or later, ana the sooner the
e noe,,, ,ri.,..,.. ,.,.
A. DocoeS wished to know how this subject came
: before tie House ~
j ine "peuNer rrpIIed that the genueman from
! 0'ro nv presented IL rs question OF pnyi'ege'
l. i"rny', not ha'ihg read the article wished to
, UT ; whether II mentioned names OF members oi
''% Mi liC,Sr; C.I ~
u x WIS &C. IAN II mentioned hls name
c uSs'"rli3n comes from an oihcer OF TINS BODY
# NJ: " '0'C!' "!e peEohu inc paico oi Protectoil'
# t ~ u" iiPio9t'oh 'hht persons may "Ssassato
''t'u use E'oIehee ne haI prepared reSo-
-, p"' ficI'IIcu u lc"'e inc SUBJECT 10 inc
/ "'IjI,'1 ~, VI inc Rouse
Il, o"s ! want the resolution read perhaps may
r oHI' ''' "'nemuhcht'
=. Jones OF Tenn Without intending to take part
IN 'ne controversy; submit there is nothing IN
1t the matter winch the practice of the House would
authorize as question of privilege. If the editor
gl " It newspaper has assailed member OF this
H.use' mat Is III capacity different from another
on,ter OF the House d"d IN that OF private ihdi-
: NHua"
s me npcaRer sustained that view, butncvertheess
- 'houg"1 Mr. tlGdngs had right to present q
Hnestloh OF privilege IN tie form OF resolution:
Alter consderabie debate ON this point, Mr.. Gid
= uing submitted the following:
+ hereas, o. L. Nicholson. printer to this body,
hn !; liz ",u %, te n;,hihs5on onioi'
Il ~ i,'' tt'is or'l"s, published an article
y non,lnr, W ~ W 'u rioie,'t oiI
,i;i y; 10 O""s t"0,y'ose itSoiNr" 't.t'
$ NV NV fvu l1"'is"i, "u al, o'crs GohhGc'eu win
c Wau iTa " '"'oi' De eAPclic1 from TINS
J., ii" NJ, o,,. ,,
:. to H,,.s H.CF5anu n.y.; my co.eaSno 70 ask
Or,oJ U u.'S irGI Ie l"J5 ne Is
d 'i slileI'eneo lpI"rna''y WIN violence Perhaps
Of NV r9", odc in NY T9st" 'e T'e m, 're ~
but in it he clearly iptmotes he Is nfo;J Of he;n
assailed for tho course oF n5licv Lo bas n,frsn"j
in relation TO certain measures InC,rc tLis IJonso