The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-03-01

hmnn9Deok allowing Calf rniA 70 locate her share Any
nslvsysd a.A unossupisd lsnds not having any niass
chArssess, which vN sdoped
nr. nAsos, (dsm Of Va PROPOSED to debate the bill
shs Pop snsa. Il The subject. and proposed 70 mai:
- sa tns special order for future day His motion
fhs ban was the. ordsrsi 70 be snsrosssd bat without
xsostng nnal action i further consdsraon was post
Yoaed, saa the Senate ,soh up
TIE NEBRASKA BILL.
Mr. BsoozzAD. (dsm) OF Pa, said that no made
upeeoh n favor Of the principles OF this bi six years
go a.d iasorsd for Il. sdoPos DC vas 70. :, ta maSn
hsd sesn the South uniting to elect yior 20 the
Pssdssoy, although he had refused 70 declare himself
opposed 70 the Wimot proviso He had also ieen dnos
ne 9Th haroh 1888 much willingness on tbs part
n Southern gentlemen upite Ia the administration Of
the political affairs Of the country With those Who mp
ported the wmot proviso and stood, Ia 1885, on the
Buaaio platform For these intended to have
: sa.rns postion, b. felt It inou1Ssas 8. him nim
10 express his views he spoke the entertain
meat Of the ssls ries nor for sentimental readers 1t
homebs desired only to pressB facts 10 his oonsusns
He . working member, and mot spsakiug one. he
did bsisvs, with his oolssgus thath nsssurs was
Che MINDS Of the Northern friends OF the a.
1850 desp feeling OF regret Of hostility Northern
would never BE- opposed to the sxtsndon Of the
right o. the people TO regulate their Thoss
who were opposed to tits bill those Who posed
% the annexation Of Texas and who voted always Tor the
Wilmot proviso. Tns measure vas not a his ooes
said was ircoDsstsnt With the legi.latiou OF 1850
but the prineplss of the Legislation 1850 we're wholly
inconsistent with the Missouri c'mpt mise, and had
Deem 20 declared BY vote Of three ourtha Of tho
ate He would show that 1t the peculiar advocates
OF tbs Wlmot proviso Who bad Annusd and rspudatsd
better for the the Aiseour line; under that
hne slavery was secure south OF It. II cheat.
Uns or this bin slavery not recognised either North
oc South OF the ns svd people fr adopt 10
not he regretted that ne AID his eo.sgus who repre-
se.tsd the great State dividing the North and South
aud Afro dvidr the fAnstcsm OF the North from the
uresp OF the SOUTH could agree upon this measure
He has hoped that Northefn whig at least
would have voted r the BILL and he would have rel
III or but he fant hat
even bis colleague h uld not vote With his southern party
friends shet that unless this bill passed, and forever
olosed all sectional aton there would be dissolution
Of the whig party formation of party with
a!tsr sectiosal feelings and jscts. Tho question in
Slavery could to the Nebraska Kansas Terrific
The soil and climate there adverse to
and soil and climate had more influence In introducing
excluding slavery than Congressional snsctents While
there was rich vacant lands In LouianA Texas Arkan
sas Missouri Mississippi and even chihuahua suitable
the production OF cotton rice and sugar. saveheers
would not attend cultvxs the pra-es and big
Of Nebraska The Senator from hassaohusst (Mr. Eve
rstt) admitted this sp.sch It was difficult
for The other Senator from that STATE Mr sumnsr) to
avoid the conoluion That other Senator had stated
thAt NebraskA the latitude Missouri, bat
he forgot 10 add that 1t also In the latitude
Pennsylvana, New York, and moss OF New England.
he avsrss to all sectional chickering's amongst
remember that the constitution re,oguzsd slavsry-t
recognized II In the provision relative rugtves and
Also n Glowing representation for SLAVES he Was op
we're Of slaves and they not to be set free
In eAy to st.Ivs, nor vas the world to Be sglatd
into the millennium In l8i7 nearly the whole Northern
members in Congress instructed to vote for
tae wnmot provho. He the only Northern
,.ou sa0 hi it, ya,:d s1s M
principle this bill he advocated the Missouri ccmpro.
mise then secondary measure to the principle Of this
BILL He desate AND, with the Wilmot proviso he
borne down, and Mr. Csss defeated for Pfssi
dency But the wlmot proviso had boon put down. and
question which had to be met It would come up some
time and ought to be now settled upon constitutional
grounds. The North forth, were willing to meet and dis
approve OF the right Of popular suffrage The
friends OF the wimot provlso responsible
for tie repeal OF the Missouri compromise. 1t their
aot Jeferson's csim under acquisition Of Louis
ara, extended 10 the Pacific and the South ssas The
Missouri comProm.e line was intsndse BY those who
tended but so declared In their speeches Ban Hardin
IL bic speech on the compromise, advocated line
r prohibition north, and permission south Of It. Mr.
Syens, OF Connecticut four DAYS before its adoption
Ii. p.oias would not be- ysry sseiao ms.s1r 70
1t then understood TO extend to the Pacific
1t vas 80 understood In the Of Tsxas In lS45 II
IL Is4S the South offered Missouri us and he In
Speech ON IT. suppord he voted for It, and Only
from Nav York. voted for it. Thu advocates o, the
Xmot proviso then voted down. and inslsted
povso They abrossted annulsd repealed, and repudi
eted the Missouri compromise, by refusing aow
original prope sed extension TO the Pacific Ia 1885, among
hose voting for the wmot proviso ami against tho Mis-
souri, oomproms. were his colleague and all the orhs,s
W.. THOMPSON (dtm Of N. followed in support Of
the ball. he said thst no part Of the country had been
more devoted TO the constitution III New Jersey No
part OF the country had readily responded approx
fnsy 10 the eompromis measures OF so than New Jsr
sy Toe Democracy Of that State bad endorsed those
This bin In CO with the principles
OF the acts Of 1880 and Consequently In accordance
vas. mor.pyer ius rtrht and proDer u ts.S Il "a,
further rsot eDiton of the right OF the people
deter mine their laws institutions for themselves
III fnS . afrfrf
cpls he denied that the Missouri restriction was any
coupronise or compact The Missouri compromise
ISL which Va. ' compact '' with sn'o S'a.oua ~
d 1t she would pass any denying 10 the ctisen
Of other States the rights and immunuss possessed BY
Others within her lin its-snd the compromise was
Affected b. shis bill. The Missouri prohibition being
conss emit with the right Of self govsrnment
Je;ssy Fought 70 BY repeated. Mr. Thompsos pursued
subject mach further and when he closed Mr. Clayton
sot he aoor and the further consideration OF the bill
INVENTOR The SOLAR COMPASS
rhs bill compen satps the inventor OF the solar com
Pa. us.e 10 the Und States surveys was taken up do
On mooo the Senate won't into executive session. and
a,.srvArds cd Jurnsd.
House OF Representatives
WARRINGTON Feb. %, 1854
fan Pnmos AoArssr The RIGHT OF NIKE WALSH SEAT
THK HOUSE.
Mr. Ewuo, (whig) Of KY, said the Committee on Flee
tsoes, 10 which referred the petition of G,orse
Isaac sad Others contrasting the right Of Mr. Mike Walsh
10 seat In ths House. had come to the conclusion
port back ths petition, and asked to be discharged from
ih further confederation The petition 10 not oorrobo
rated BY any proof, ana accompanied BY the unprscs
dsnted request that commission be scat to Now York to
hks evidence.
The motion was Agreed to unanimously.
LANDS 10 wIsooSsS.
The HouIs resumed the eonsdsraAon Of the motion
refer 10 the Committee OF the whole the state OF the
Uaion the Senate bill granting lands to Wisconsin or
railroad purposes.
Nc BRsnL (den } OF III, said that the policy dates as
Tar back the oldest State formed out OF public
In Not oaly has Illinois but the general government
ard ,ettss OF that State have benefited By tbs grant
tbs great Central road and What Of tiAt work il
hue OF ell grants for similsr rurposes
Mr., CURING, (dsm of ~ Y, said he vas Yesterday
informed that read proposed 70 be built by the srg.
OF government lands exceed 600 acres
rsspso;s the branch road from Jauesvis to hsdsoo,