Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1854-07-14

;ar'' Ia lhcm'.
Spcak.!- "i 'i' va, '"', ,gmt'' " = ~ T
WIZ ''l NOR Ill.,. ,., L;I,.uro.
iEFt ~ II ,'ich "'-"' TT.,';,I ' i .,',
AMI w." .lrA.'": ~ n : =, . . ' I''
SION Is ~" SAM w. w, ~, NJ - ,r ,,,;,
n N"' ~; I-' a'' ,,',,,i h y.i, il, .i .a,,,rn
80 ,I ,,,I.-i D, ,y,. suu.,.r,. court v.t ri,.
" j, rrr n,.ior.:, Of ;i',, hail iluvr r,,y,r
=. ms a. law tor , administrator" ui ru-i,C' In sn'i
r,iriniy ich -hn mol b" .rlu-mut I" tA:. act. O ~!
=, ill The iH''; aid 'ols'!i|"m q in' ni,H
state" ~ no law .i"' %" p,,.r% ',n,'t.Hf Wi, W.
primary "' i''"i ri '"' ,' "' ~ %
r"!-'pH' ~ ,, ;;.i G.o,,l W., iII . low;
~ n,r n,.r,y Of non residents hc taxed higher ,auu
.. i.s ~ ,tlri pro"r,y u r-ii"l,s All tine w- s!nl
M ,n,rJ "a rIa GuItgr,., Of t,.. United Satc. anl
',,,, @ ,'..I -L,,ii.. mil ,ui ,o:d"
T Tr ~ IT, ,',.r oI,,Lrr Standardization 10 Com
~ " ,.,,,,. .,.r-i..ril ,.,,i.r,,,u,.. Srrrl,.
Gr's., liaGH"t 'tP'" "I'It"' 'S'T:n'W''S' 'h''!'
i"E'>IE!urcH Wi'" h,.'! Nv :" o''"''' '"''' r.
ScSH II ScnD!i'!Sc VI S'c'''-",' -No'IcN' "', ~.
hands III which ! w'e Er"P"sr', III pursuance "i Iy
"! pTccrd n:a, I" H:i"ei' IN" power -! tcrrN":"!
!c-l-a:iuu. I"r are those ~ -r|"Ti"r, Scc:eiury,
and i"ircs-"tficer- "l'" w'r' ev9Tf one to ne A.
poh'c' u!n co:hshse'o''d ~ ttc i'ea'r' '''d pau
o"' ~ Inc 'eh''n' ". ''.'I M ,,
Wtfost tr"i'e hh u P!'" '-'' mus ~
St'tnt"d r"n!d cacr'S" rGw": when - r.,'i'eniN
"Tr"S",-tne p""e:' hh'''I' !" !'f'". '' go;
niei''' WAN "'ea T. 'i''':' W ''''H''' va -" ~
S'i.er' ~ , !, ~ ,,, =, ,,, ,. H.;
IL ~ IA" 80, W. W.. ,''H " " i':., .' y"
F"''S -: ',1 .'" ",.' I" - @ ' IT,
J
LEAGUE Mr. MILLS" cn'' n'' n", 'c"s''' WI; We
should lsTuS' 'ne" Oh tH i"cS!ou' Ut '," ~ ic"'c
Il Ia 'hr''. vi L"!EG '!.' i!'"e 10 ,;,;
we" "' '''os "t' ,S"..'' ~ | I'm ''','', '.,.,
"hirb or ru!'H "''," me- "i'i i'mN''' t""'c
passage from a" t'E't cn',' III Mch 'Ie "i';'' T'
opnl"u I" the Court was 6clfcTrd ny me 'A!r' JUS
t!rr. quote 1t 10 slow TIC c"hrir'r su'y"'i'A '"
and 'i:p"Hdcncc upon Congress "' tcrfi'"f1! "rS"
niLntiuI III TIE cstinHiiOn "f me supreme 'r D!
III" Inlird States. II WI! he borne III hnH l''n M al
appeal I" TINT Court, III nl cases lnTGFii? u!!c I"
slavcs II provided III :Ee clrarcrt terms ny ne hHll.
sa:-Nrhnsha bill In Srrr aud i.ara" re-. nor ana
others, y tranch 13S, d"c!dci! IN ielo, We hh";
The. power Of governing me. of -..timc FOR terri.
,ury !, ti iu"i;tb" consequence q: :Er r.t acquire
n! 10 hold crr,ory Could i! poetic" be- r"ncst"d III"
Constitution oi the 'hd SIM'r' '"clnr'r r'n' ,o-'r'
,HaI h"' power I" "'!"'' VI u'' '"N' "'' 49, 49,
n:H r":n'o'. u" srEcor;u W wD ,ni
Cn',,.- r".....ipr nn ,xrrri,ing ihr Is,I," nni u
disputed power OF .ov r,.u r.d lrsislaue for Terri
tory OF Oricn- Con.r i. gi"c them .i,lS" M
cX.uv" Hmd !udicnry with -ucn powers ~ ms he1
their will 10 assign !" t"s" departments r"N"ciNrF
I; nuurar- "a mo that tine legal .n.iditv must hr
VERY r.at which can hesitate To commit The qurroi
T ..snuu,.,r .ny,rr;rntv" Ia tribunal which ha-
.rch = rnuc.,,ru f tI,.. r.ln,inn h,wcru CONGRESS
amd ,h, Territories; II j. lust, Simply and absolutely
;,-;,,l ti., ,l Srnr,,,,. Cn-rt ,,,u hnll tlnt II
rI ;.i,,,r,. ,,. ry,I,da y. - ,h,. Snut:,
., - ,- .,,, T.,r."Ln n,,J E,r.u. wL.u
I> " " >,',... "o ,,,L ,r,,yrr-,y',,n ~, .urh
no,,,r i, ,h, C,r', ',;.n.icrL,nI when, in the bill
80, (,.o. y,,r,I IL. ,,,I;,.,.. ,l,c ,,ro,l,. ui
,,, Trr;.nric. IN ,hc;r ,c.iuu an mrr ilIs;Itu
t;nu.~ - III. C,u.tiu;nu Let !, Lr lornr i. mind
thn, am unt nu,y ur,,sw with upt-uruvi-oists but
w;,b ,bn.a vii, o.Gr.r t,at th. Constitution giyrs
c,,r. -, r,,v,r f., ex.iu1 nuy citizen with his
! r,nu,.rtv fr,iu The Territories Of the lnon. The
! friend. of this bill arr. II uni; ia that belize.
Sir havc no iea-s fo: th result of the agreement,
,vh;rh This hill mike. upnn the QUESTION uf territorial
mowers TII stand she i,nxnr,!" no: u. '.,hc die,
h nf ;udrin ,Irr;Su on s,h an s~ur not only rCfi-
div lri; inyfuv Tie friends .. the bill who differ
.ii, me. viii Doubt nur do the -;.lnc. So "hr"i!-
r,., vju dwell tu,rcr in unifv: and ;ilp>r who hop"
m i,rrn,lucr ,Ii.curI a,uum. u ar, destined 10 find
! ,hu. ..tLry reckon without frl- host
Now n l,.w word, a. Ia the bahgrr Amendment. ]
understand III tcn; and effect I" be at fr rry jar
k5,>' than tl- precise anG formal 'l,ci"-
-a,on en- r. part of the. south. that III" Is willing
without the invocation u' ANY special !,s,a;umw hat
ever f., rest her r,im tn the ni:. Occupation ot Me-
/ hr,.ka and kals;s simply ami solely on the Cuiet
;u,oY. This is all ;la; can dp gns>lLLtq hr maiu
,,.r :, Tb. rrru,n.,rnr., ami ,uo,iy,, mi il, ru-
Lur,ion I understand ;o bc tlc.r: Th argument nrI
tr uhrorati,n nf TN. Missouri restriction had far pro-
~. ss.,l-alnusi to- Its cn,clu,ir. The friends OF the
m llud ppcaicd - the principles ana siar;iIItirs al
In, Constitutions n. boil! the. sword ami shield al ;GIur
u.r,", n,ul d,mnnd and no southern S>,.i;"r ha'i
ever in;iInn",! rclunc" an?tlliuS ''". In" vote
maud III the senate. wi"n u wi'~ mot "iir '"--
rscd. Int urged hai. III fact, iiie Hn'''.' inniH t'
court the protection al aId 0 certain iH'a "i Th!'cc
nr S,a!.r which hnl existed prior I" our acqu>:i"
uI lnui,iaa. The rur.l, o.. the ill eagerly seized
upon iii- wcapua ii assault. SvEc -! H. northern
friends were embarrassed, am '!!St tir''"d. WHAT
thrnl WHY, tie South simply rarl-tuls 'lhfiv lay
hr settled n once. our !urCrn friends relieved. ana
.ur urr lrru nnpn,.n> ,snr.:."; We arr. willing IL
put IN rrr,niu md unmi-:ak,.i la.gln." in the hll
Ii~.lc that which w,. hmv"s - often ,-scrt" and Insist
eel up"n in debate. Thu. .!mi.cac Unr sincerity,
:s; ;;,.;i tho ROAD 4, u;l: -; 0:i:,;. ]: !; D.
true i,,i,l what so,,:hcrli"f d"Glhs ~ iat the
Constitution drcs recognize "T. slave pE"i"riy,
nnl gives us equal rights. in and 10 tho com
lilon possessions oi III" Union. with our north
,ri Erfhr"n i! We linv" Ln ni--Iriu-- aH |" ih'Tt
prr,osr.rs is 40, the bill it !"nlS nj! wr can .i,
! Sire Evrn il We m;9ht find >oIa. muunrH ~ ti!'
in the old French or Spanish law. or nny o;!"r sp'
cal .ur .trcI,t WHY mike question G!u1t IL II. IL
decd the Constitution he that :iiprc.nnc iur!rcs'
~, c,,r H.. which w. ho,.n nlwlys rIn;inc,i that il
is It- ,yd,. rn,rs nr,. on, ned IT, lls by this bill
, When invited within IT, strong walls WAY rI"n!u We
care inr mud r.poubis of French or Spanish OF ici,
rifnral laws pr,-unl" ;h"rui. u" man. WI" w"'i'
not prefer - hn! Gud enjoy his property T rlr''r I"
the plain ro"r"ns ana lofty guarantees I" 'he '?h'
-iutrn nf his own country, rather than resort 10 III
r': and nuh;iu! 'llsl'E;ata"D: Hs 10 !Ii, '"9"IE''
ton Of foreign tcyr;"ria Iaws. wh1ch nave sum
np:cd, for generation at least. TN hi"ih"f bral'n
81; rhc srtJ-t have pointrd out tuni The 'lHy,nl
cn,nrromtr was supported hy almost .ir whole s"nh
prn representation IN Congress, led on ~ Old john
Calhoun, whose wisdom nnd devotion lneir MN
very touch s;on" o; III" "acrt upon 'he s"u,n' I"
I every plcasurc on which hi. mind was brought Il
bear. That compromise as we hnvc seen, let TO th'
Courts the settlement ui thr rights III the south undc
the Consu in tac whole territory acquired iron
Mexico wit! Mexican r,,ti-slnvcry laws unrrpcnicd
into hr bargain.
Nothing can be- NOR" unqualified anI complete Thar
the rcliancc which, in 1873 southern statesmen ace'
"n the Constitution Tor the Eccurt% "' sI"'c lr""rl
III Territories. Mexico had passed law- t"hb,i!ii.
the institution o; slavery in California and New acA
ic". and Congress had refused 10 REPEAL them lc
Calhoun AMI his assoriatc. were n" o:s!y w!!i!' on
eager !" tthl 'heir 't.cn"I"'';s '''''''"''''' '>
armed WIN 'hr ,"h7't"i"i H:i'. s,:,,,. r,r ~,
ihr! III" ''''' "'H''u9' AZ @ =; ,t .,c -, ,n,cr
maintenance nt "nr r!gii:' even III ~ '".r w L',
"r Giver-e lc:stn"il. N"sF - n, !n'' " y lro..
(" 0rS IrY"''. we hlect ~ ...j T",'' "', -; C,r
ka and Kansas, NJ was T., m DC en- IS ,h tr,r,
MIA ailt New N'tNc". ,r, ,,,,t .y,. rim, of th,
| Territories hH '"i'i"'c'i ".' I,.,I 1;L.r.,o,..