The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1854-04-08
Northern sentiment In favor Of the Nebraska
Bill.

Prom the Potsyile (ra) Register.
Nothing is more certain than that The questions nvolv;
ed in the organization OF Nebraska cannot be overlooked
or ovelaug he'd Year after year The mailer VIII come
before Congress and in more pressing shape each Tune
Nebraska will knock for admission with more perunaci-
" after every refusal; and however we may postpone
the 10 her prayer, there must come cay "heh
that answer can no longer be delay ea :, =.
Nor il il less clearly written in The book OF tate that
that ans wer 10 be final, must be IN exact accordance
with the sacred principles of The constitution men
the msts OF prejudice have been cleared away, aud the
first impulse Of angry passions Gained all parties VIII
that the question involved - not one oil slavery OF
anti slavery The moral iniquiy charged upon The one
and The superior claimed for the Other are 6o1b as
foreign to The question the crime OF stealing OF the ex
cellence OF honesty. Ills probable that The geographical
poson the physical character and The climate OF we
braska will ia point OF fact, exclude slave labor from ~
soil but this has nothing 10 do with the point N dts
pue. That point involves one OF me most important
principles oil our consituionone OF tie ehei corner
stones on whish this Union resslhe question whether
citzens OF the United States, IN new Territory or
State have under the constitution, the same night 70 de-
ermne and regulate their own social institutions ss ne
people Of New York any other State North or South
IRON the Lowell CNass) Daily Advertiser
We that The opponents Of tbs b preedd to
make distinction between Utah and New MeIico abd
Nebraska and Kansas upon the ground mat TIE tormtr
Territories acquired from Missouri while lhe slicr
part OF The Louisiana purchase 70 wheh the Mis-
sour Compromise line applied. But hls distinction ~
wholly uaayaiinea suberfuge-ior Utah includes
within is boundaries part Of the same Louisiana pur-
chase But then hey say Utah contains only lew bou.
SAID ceres OF it Well, grant it--whai iheni 81 what
principle you justify supporting or "aoquitseins M
that takes few thousand acres ~ ne Louis
lana purchase which does not equally justify your sup
potng or "acquescng IN" measure taking lew more
thousand scresl II IL j. wrong 70 orgapizs Nebraska
upon the principle OF TIE rBit OF he people because e-
braces part oi the territory 10 which the Missouri Com
promise applicable. must have been equally wrong 70
bave ogsnlzed Uah upon that principle Tor thal aso en-
baced part OF The OLD Louisiana purchase 70 which
the same Missouri Conpfomse applied.
And nov, IN conclusion, we would cay 70 our wig
friends, and 10 democratic friends sso you are de
termined TO oppose The Nebraska bill ius Say oandidJ
and honestly tbal YOU have changed, repened; that You
10 iongsr believe IN, will support, nor acquesee 10
he Sompromise OF 30 else. that sou never DID sup
Porl nor acqnesce in it, and that you were playing
NE hypocrte when you gave public pledges That ycu
would do 80.
Prom the Albany IN, W Argus.
NKsRasrA-lhe more the question is eanvassed dis
assonsiey, the more generally the Of all parties
petome convinced OF the bOiawness Of HE clanf which
VIZ agiiaofs bare attempted to raise against he Nebraska
WIZ and on the soondness Oh The principle which
Hh based u may be regarded fixed fact that what
ever elect NOISY and faHatcal aa Nebfoska denunca
Won msy have had uron weak neryes and weaker pFn-
eHes ai The outset, has led IN al other quarters
more thorough Examination Of me merits Of the real
Question involved W the Nebraska bin and the result has
as we have saed,s vey general convection among
speeung men, WITHOUT regard party, that lie great re-
shce Tor The ptaee and stability the Union npon the
hueily with which the national Congress shall adhere to
meprlnople recognised in the compromise legislation Of