New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-01-14


INPURSUANCE OF an order OF the Surrogate Of the
County Of EiS SSSS EssY S %
a 5 he a. Ss's' CHA T E
S + .rss., hksE4 NSa sHEasE
IN PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate of the
Of Sif Ss Gy ys s Of he Pc
York merchant dec sse to Pes, the 'as With & tess9'
nGtst in the CITY Of NewYOri before the
day January ne1Ded the day 0fJay'
1855 J SsEFhh JACKSON, a @.ss4s
IN PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate Of the
s 9oj s Ss'sy IKE
ne eS s s.nI =, me same with vouchers thereof
iss SUBSCRIBE at bis Office No Williams in so CITY Of New
Y, aS on sS Ssy S s f5'i
vi" iyIs LAWNS Executor Of Jesse Barker, deceased
IN PURSUANCE Of an order of the Surrogate of
h.1ns cisins sssr. MICHAEL DoUGhERTY late q the City of
subscriber h 'e.dnes No Sn's,y Il the o,s
York the sixth day January 1854 .,.,...,.,.
j iswsmssts MARYD DouGHEaTY, Adnlni.sra.r...
IN PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate of the
Claims sssns, JOSEPH HILL ls OF tho City Of Sew.YSIl
50 S sc 81, Of ysS
yorh on or esore the tS,,1G gay 3, nay
TIE '"en'S'n''" u'' Vi ANDREW WARD Administrator.
ne lsw6ms. ANN ELIZA HILL, AdmInistrstris.
IN PURSUANCE of an order of the Surrogate of the
ssS sn t sJ P cy Ss%
sI desasd to Tent the same With voucher.
sSI.rSer ode, No g cG.t IA the City q Ne~iYoGl
day f SsSs%S'F 1883 LEWIS wAE Exsss,or
IN PURSUANCE Of an order Of the Surrogate of the
County 1S1. hsEssy Ts s % % Of S s.,
. nIs he 70 rlrden % No. hs Guy New
S S Gn d OF S Of july ,af s HGH PESfz
JUS sw6us
MORTGAGE sALE.-Default having been made in
condition Of eerisp Tor'ss Se'rSs G1S the s ey 81 Ap
an. md state tS ON Of Sor. JoS cRAM wssIlI hs
County Of sstos snd State so5esd ~hs c sa Ss
sbs , eu Ss' Of 'SS' s Ms
rs S Sn. 'S ss.si PS %'ns s sa a9ss
n' Two Ssr s E,t ss s f~' . 81 Ward
NewYOrk Wa. h.t and betwesn the On qua a
iss fwsS wsra Of Nsv5sIIs made y a,orsss
Of the Rssr oth City and County Of ..s snpys
ard one ndIed and thirty nine $50 which sid log tsLsoio
shsr bounded described o. ss"a's S q point ?;
the from ts intersection With tue vest
s;I NH n Of th y fes 80 thence
sl with ssv Aforesaid one ha1dea re-, four az, s
o. ~ thence , yyS and & n ~'s the the Place q be-
sbrns whereas amount msd TO Be doe spor .ss
ss sS so, or proceeding law having nusS
debt secured BY the said %orsss OF 10y par
s aid SS sSsst eosss$ Which ;.S's
f CITY q S.sfS a9 81 18th J ~
NEW-YOHK SUPREME COURT.-PETER NE
~ FUs against ELIJAH HARRIS sunmgos iot MONEY
s herr BY summoned and required the complaint IN THE
which dsS IN the qss Of the CLERK o. .,s CITY aad oo21
70 the ssa on ne .osso 'r n ~
dst sr ri he service Of t6 you Ius
o,eh service sod fail to anwe. 81. said ysa
sss yOu three HUNDRED and gwen lss dollars
snG sh hatdd and bed: he cot: q sa 1Ga
Dt y t, Dfs ssi 100 Plaintiffs Attorneys
CUPREME COURT.-In the matter Of the aPplica.
q the MysI Adsrm.S s9S c:S o ss.
the acquiring Il land. Tor Reservoir in the si y est~ss.
1 and s.s:u 80. sa ne ce nh ana s
(: .s.as q .ss e s9 s
f R f a1 IL the c, Of sh 1855 .hI.s
s sf psS ssFr RSS
.IS Ss sc ca q s Of
y e % .. nd sS GfS s S 'ss
FSusry s opening Of ne Coat that day or .s.en
cssn;s =. r G ss % sn s a.
6s % ss' sn4 Ess sd: s
. hsrsSrs@snts and premises lie Ssh sud ssh
nc d. cd s ave. .dS 's sss "a q.
E'sISO a or .ss CITY s Z, Dsn o al. e Az
s Gf I'D 81 20 ;S o:a q % s
The City Of sew-YOrt and for oss5 p9po;s| 2a~sd
Course: to ,h Gors';,sn and the c0'on Aadae sS,ss
SUPREME COURT.-CHARLES g. PfNCKNEY
- against LOUISA 7. SMITH. Summons for money d:usad
seryedb To the above u nd
hereby and required answer the
thI which flied IN rbs oce OF the CLERK OF ae cy hs
County rew-YOrk al the Cy Hall 10 ad CITY saa 20
py youT the said complaint oa The ,.
tfee a. Nssnst NewYors. Within % days al ertss
tb sun mons Of the day Of such service
plsi M IN his scoD udxnent assiat 700 or a7
che hundred liney dollars wfh Interest hg,o t1'
e.nbtr 1855 tn Of this &C on D,ts. =
ls4 AUG T. KIM fiA'hNSS 70 aS~..a,,,,
jlf lsE6ws' s s-s- -,
& UPRFME COURT.-RALPH II. PlEksON and
- Isa HARRISON as.inEf DAVID bREEFE -sannons tef
demand on Com not served 40 ne es'.-
- sIve nsnsd You hereby nopes snd -
y . IN, HI thu scob, which vii De hisd tae o..; ~
H. cisrl az Ia City County Of Hewfok at tue ciy @
"a ~ ara "a serve snsssF 70 tat SAD co
On ~, nj .lsr At Office No los Broadway said eyer
wp ser the service OF h sun mons
rev Of he dsv Of sueh service. and you hn to
% 80 ~ - within the time Aforesaid the psnatn
b viii take judgment srsnst for the OF o1f ian
de- A. dollars with from the 18th day Of Asg
ere housns sht hDded and forty sx besides The eos 'n>
''''A PsiaifS Attorney, No Ios sroa4wsy, n. Y,
The complaint In this ion hed 10 sid CLERKS onse 90 90
Ish Dc, Of JapOsIy ISd jas -
SUPREME COURT-LEANDER GAhD 0edsn
- plaintiff sssrst LEWIS PACE and nelson "V"Vsv~<
the above deDdsn;s Yoe her saaoees
ihe compliant IN This action Which sd "a me ne
ofibt Cerk ofthe County ofCsaugus on the Shday
lfi3 aid copy VI Jour on 10. ~ -
County within twenty dsJs
ler,oi exclusive the day q srsh s'rfce ae - -
complaint sfor,sd th Plnt VA -
o. snr ~ ssTentvs eeE dollars ard - senf
f.alIs fls