The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1854-04-18

as anxious to have provision made for the
on of the custom-house Mobile any other gehtemaI
s to have provision made Tor his state but the represent
alive who has the matter especially in charge from tina
district understand, is opposed to putting th'
amendment into this bill He Is opposed to il now no
because he does the appropriation made not be
lie thinks that shall ultimately get the appro
priaon but because he has solemn and deliberate con
viction that If the amendment be adopted 10 this bill
cannot receive the sanction Of the House Of Representa-
tiyes.
In addition that understand that all the estimates
made by the distinguished gentleman who at the head o
the Treasury Department now Embodied IN general
appropriation bill which win probably find IT'S way into
this body in two three weeks Hence deem II my duty
to say, that in giving the vote that shall give 90 not
by any means intend to repudiae the appropriation which
Is intended 10 be made for the custom-house III the Guy o
Mobile but do from the deliberate conviction that the
most efectua way to obtain the appropriation Is not TO
prejudice il in the estmaton Of the Senate by attempting
to place ii in this bill and win say, further that It was
included in the amendment without my knowledge priyity
consent and believe may say the same for my col
league Mr. CLAY] know nothing Of The merits OF the
amendment presented by the senator from Maine And
say very frankly that when not fully informed upon
the subject inclined to support the amendment o the
senator from kentucky for took II TOR granted l1at an
the appropriations contained in it legitimate and that
they might perhaps with proprety be placed upon this
b but since have inquired into the matter and learned
the effect which will have upon the BILL and that may
ultimately TO extent affect the appropriations them
selves hen the matter properly before the Senate,
II deem it my duty to vote against IT,
Mr. BAYARD. desire 10 suggest to the honorable SEN
aor from Alabama that think he msapprehends the facts
of this case Every Of the cusom-houso appropriations
included in the amendment was separately sustained IN te
other branch of the legislature and the fact as to whether
the bin was broken down their account is mere mat
ter of conjecture There other amendments which
were considered Objectionable in the bill and the bill was
broken down ms whole have no remarks TO make on
the snguary of the proceeding Every OF the amend
mens adopted part Of the deficiency bill by de-
cided vote and cannot that there Is any reason 10
suppose that the House will reject this bill because they are
placed in it, allow say according the recommend
alton of the Secretary of the Treasury he evidently
CARDS these rs deficiencies If they not proper dei
ciences cannot understand the object and purpose Of
the bill They relate to precedent appropriations They
continue works for which precedent appropriations
have been made and which from unforeseen OF
cost Ii impossible go with under the former ap-
propriatons You must either suspend the works year.
for the whole building season. make the appropriations
now The question of time material as to these ap
preparations than any other appropriations IN the bill
If that is not sufficient ground for putting them IN de-
fciency bill If the appropriations are proper III themselves
loss what is This presents asingular fact
Here is democratic administration, with democratic
majority in the Senate and democratic majority IN the
House. and the Secretary of the Treasury recommends these
TO you as deficiencies and you propose reject the
mendaton without far as have heard solitary OBJ
lection being made rs to the proprety Of the appropra-
tons themselves indeed without reason being given
why they should go into this bill except that might
hazard the bill in the other house
As regards the Secretary of the Treasury allow me TO
say that differed from him certainly very widely IN the
course which he took in reference to the local disputes IN
New York regretted it. thought it an error OF Judg-
ment and was sorry that he involved the general gov
e"i " -, -, y.... :. M ~, ,,og, certainly os
s - :; "a "a SLna ~ Law in tho eynenditures from
regards reia aonelen'1 ~ @ =. .o ona ahramnt ~
lne treasury as .e nSahtoS ;nter;ty
Tue government iuna' as W. a. arota ., All tbe
anu a'enuoh non ~ T 1 nior ~ ,be e,oyernment
ouues oi nS I'M I'M 80 sI,. c,n,,ara and am not
ni.h w, i,ou ~ ", 49, 49, "a an,iroIv throy
aispoSeut W uiu a,i a. a ,atter' which he has had
ssiae % hs Ieeoinh'e t II " ~ " .h,b1y locked AZ and
n to meet which being made in this
aas c;a,,cr ihli bo has e,iven Won the reasons
aeneiency on ne ,l s sa. @ on me amendment 70 the
omsnapant 4st''i /, WAS agreed to.
% oas nd navs were then ordered on the amendment
NJ D0DGE of Iowa now move to amend the amend
at ~, ad5in,o tbe following.
~ = ~Nse -, sa,
To complete the marine hospitai ~ Oie'eiano oo go
VoV. -, !. :. "a. nt..orri
TO complete the marine nospilh AZ g. ho"i'' ' ,
siy,Vvo ,, H. in. bosritsI At Chicago Illinois IS
nod AZ Noinp'0'0 Wv
n oo,,p,at the marine hospita at Louisville Kentucky,
s,3 100
To complete the marine hospital at Paducah Kentucky,
81, 900.
To complete the marine hosptai at fvahsVe, ihohha,
So, 000 60.
To complete the marine hospita AZ San fFahcsoo' 1'
MIA, s4AooV . ,r,ti w,oor.in
10 eo eonple'e ui' "'"i0 "o'p "
IA n s,c, n, arina hos,ita. al Keokuk Burlington
al Duhnone Iowa st5 600
Nr. HUNTER Is that aInendnent IN oruer -,
The PRESIDING OFFICER lMr FOOT IN the cnair; 1,
That depends upon iac,s not IN the possessoh q .n
at this time onder the RUE y DC ,n o.uer = mus @ !.
either in pursuance oi estimate from department. " mus
be report from committee
Mr.. DODGE, OF Iowa wiz stae uat a,i W, piv,is 1f
ions contained IN u ehcep. nose ol M