New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-02-08

sheh eiu,d ssy srias fSs Frr.ies, issd ID.
6 r.. 70 b." = s s..s %, u Toe
spon ss ssssy % a.
Ssss .s S. s s s S'e ss.s fsa
40 having .es .s psss, e .s uSsa ne re-
s. q s s:s y -. g. s' s.s s E
TIE Government Of this country r,eosasd sehvad
sct over the crime shsIses 20 ga - he hS -
uE,d 81, b. r,ss,,1s Goa ss "a We
seruire complaint und oath had been na
e. f. Q: a Ia fss .a ssi a' I. . s
Pspsn which purpota 70 b copies Of ex,a =. be-
TO this esso,y the oOl A Of his nssa
ss t.d IL, 70 .sI ssd h. sr.Isiisa sv.s ne e@s
chss,d he fac. slated 70 then wso, sss Issy
cen, 20 establish sSs fact only herr;
tie fuS,Ssr et. he A.d de,'On ~.
s S:. s perm. .r rs t y ssps s
Mutrsre berg sn proved ss,' ras.,' s,'Sn,H s.f,ss
s s rs S.s P' ss%sias him wish committed the
Of .O,s kSreon ss'''s Ss5n,;, Ss. Ssss
IN ,hs case OF ksias = Howard Pss; isl fs.;ss.
cenn.st Nelson 70 r0ve thai hAd committed the Slns Of
s md s.Tsst S sSSS s:s aad .. s sS, q
certain positions upon hh or.a. wu.ni Leados had
S.sS M 80 y .SS se the complaint on
OATH essee he said sasssreds. .aa s.ssss
n od .S the oSl, sSe5es Ses s o. snssy
a. SIS ss..s IN Of az sss apSa s..as
before Cen D'',OusI spoa The ,e'Sn % %, ssn -
read, shown that tie ssicn Of the upon
sacrdtd Ffoof a,sy MSsssroisc
Alderman .n Justice Ct the psee or the tJ q LnsSa sS sas
power 70 administer can, ts,Oiss And has sees
srs ssi ss.ss
IA ss ss,hori, oS them and ia fraud Of their rsh.
endorse ths .Od Of The h.ndw.s ofess
ms and da frO. the book amount aid BIN .os
in d,psor. tend 'uo prove and evdsnc, to
prove rhs. he osp.e 'srsee A. Sy the ,s'oI sse9 con-
Dispositions t.ksn in England copies OF such sostien
The thai OF the e,.e he should des4rded
the reason a. he alleges chs, the law 2, C,a;rss,
treaty unconstitutional the treaty Uai,e4 pa
10 sssSS tS e%s Of sey @ed IA Gs.
who should Hy 3. his country deliver ap g "a, .n.So.
With The crime hs' a. m;ht .se o Seysa G aS
the United States fOm ..kOs further sn.esnen che .hs,
0 Sss SI he .a Ss %. %
August u 1913 either spnes OF stre sny Of se o.
diet the eusgemeo'. o. The trs. and doe. nos spS
not oPposec 20 ny o. we % J,s". Bs when ,be 80
before him q. validity AM when the
before supreme Court Wahnsor the judge. there
.esnoyleessd blazing ore Inc law ms, % con
before ccmrioner prove that the crime Of rsery
shsses asnst the Ie,o was y na & ~ Ias
Nelson establish the charge TIA, he was called
ash charge that he erred when he found tia. she esdencew
deemed &
issued The question that present. isl this branch Of the
"a
opinion that he erred in judging evidence wsss
that the vide dee med BY him Sufficient esb
the change he called to invtsgste Commissioner
snthoffy matter OF this kind Judge Of
gate the charge right judgment the
by evidence deemed sufficient
him when there has been Legal Evidence
erc than should have to sit In judgment
lie have such given by tao Law;
and have disposition 10 exercise power TO discharge upon
attempt 10 exercise such power uno hw
tn to me BY The Of Congress the duties
and powers of the Commissioner provides that IL on such
0LsDs evidence be deemed sufficient BY him che comns
charge, under the OF the
shall other things BE- his duty 10 ssue his war
the accused TO swst the dtenna
the President whether no Will the evidence
the Commissioner Issue warrant OF exraditou
Whr there before the Commissioner esab
legal evidence deemed BY him sufficient
matt others deem insufficient and he snh
that commitments must stand aud no
disregard 10 render inefectnl a. least
not urtii the expiration calendar months after shall
have issued In such ce no enc can revise tho oPn
ion Of tie Commouer bat the President The President
Las that power II he should be Of tho opinion that the
evidence before tho Commsone the hearing not sab
G to sustain charge then would be h duty withhold
warrant exadou. II he should be Of the opinion that
Gent would be his duty such warrant Tue
therefore, do rogare that should express
of the eebes the hearing be-
fore The that evidence has been produced before
ne however will that In judgment was sufficient 70
lola the elsto 10 trial the determination OF the Con-
oper wss folly authorized and ushed H was bis duty TO de-
eide AZ be did will reasons for this opinion tor 40
sssp The esor trial Ills youth and simplicity
would induce aid 10 his acqus than TO aid In he Coz
yieton duty declare that no must
h. Mar hal uader tho Of commit
mens thereon ~. o. iNoIhS SAhf DSSe% S""s'