New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-09-25
SUPREME COURT-SPEcIaL TERs.-Beore Judge
RnnsENrLI.

DEcIsIoSs-TRUsr ESTATE
John Cger and cger lsssc Jones and others
Bill 10 determine the validity and construction or
marriage settlement u the late Mrs Cruger (wie OF painun,
her brother Mr. Jones defendant appointed Of
the The trust provides that hs rents and pr9hs Of
self and and education Of the children In suit.
sbe manner aud at his death accrue such children am
be- living AZ thence the grandchildren IS tho
Court suppeses One land the Pneips object OF
building purpOses-he power which the trustees are in
doubt The Cou ntmated that as the trust could only es
aps hs4 husband the SON. who Is the only child and
full entitled Sa Tee IN the estate and odns SUB
and his father eaeens mosass but Sy the term, 81 ne
The Cont thinks however arrangement ms be made.
law as to tusts not allowing deviation from the
where the parties do TO change H. whereby MI Crusr
estate over nants himself and children &c, being.
soy, to the value Of half the estate ,
perfect ard contradictory part providing that they shall es
lien and smother that ne property under . a sns no.
members Of the Legislature drew 1t up. -
ing for Messr requested the Court inter part Of thu
order when drawn up that Il law should be obtained
such deposition of 1t meets the approval OF ths
The Judge said he would be willing do and hs opinion
awsys has that the LEGISLATURE whchmakess law has
power Pss. another modas or CHANGING me ssner "a ~
expressed such opinion but has been criticised SONS
An order the Judge said will be entered by the Court -
requsted by COUNSEL
SUIT As TO PROPERTY IN nURRAY-sT
In the case of WagdeDfeld 1--WE thought the Court
said there house In Murays TO be kept for
the widow during her life and she TO live In It, her husband
location &c Of streets and the question the widow
live else Some Of these cases the Judge sad
idea that world stand s when does
not apply any rate this City The trustee IN doubt
whether the house be sold and the widow i've up
she live less and herself and her child
have able" the Judge said " 70 essnine the
mere petition . 5 sei , y made DsPss
Decision in the point reserved
Before Judge MITCHELL.
wIDEEIs0 wHrTEHALL-sr.
The argument on the motion in opposition to the
confirmation Of report Of the Commissoner' In this case.
Was called on The proposition l. to widen from State St e
t%S On behalf Mr. Le'sqr Nj Day appearing
Ped Mr. OVID; building SI The .9n1I o. snS:s :1s
IT, y ,ss y s sOd Ssps hsvrs ST.
coo ard the Commissioner have allowed him out mite over
Common Council in respponting the Comssoners 1893.
were Durnsthe argument Judge Mitchell sscer-
ns and therefore not at liberty under the law sdJadae
upon Judse Roosevelt Is also interested and could zoe
"a to te Prss nted before Judge Clerke. -
PLEA OF UsURY on A NOTE.
Henry J Davids art. Thomas W. Wheeler.
Mr. ID. bought of Mr. w. note Of 81 ,070 madeby
Henry DARN paying $50 in cash and giving hs note f~
si The present sui. on The 1Gts n,sa tn. ..s
81 GO 70 be good and eosctsbls yhsrs.. ysa
for the note from plaintiff bsving giving back smother check.
which Paid for go which was for the use oil saa n'n'J'
Psin excepted 10 the answer suscbed ~
h officer before whom verified and the
not contain the requisite staemen also that the pea VI sS
wss lad as between plaintiff and defendant ,..,,, Al.
order entered to ske out snS"sI %, "a an tea
deDE 70 plaintiff required By law and Witch "a NJ ~ 3
done the note claimed I. ee css gi f'i PAA~'
Lincoln; for defendant, Mr. C-Iraey.
SUIT FOR DIVORCE.
Frederick c. Paul sgt l "a q Iden Fan N 6v