The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1854-08-03

N
% IN contribute welfare and prosperity OF the town
ts 70 mi. measure was individuals the whole
the United States property at 81 hs viii
b. evident stated that the whole OF Harpers Ferry
Belongs Of 70 ns wheh remained ii the hand.
the original owners, OF those holding under theh
BE part on account Of the proximity Of the buildings upon
shops, endangerng their safety or Tor other par
enough 10 cndeayor 10 own houses compelled to be
ycnd limit of the United States property 70 DO So Inc
drspated habits although aordng every facility to those
seemed DESTROYS to amend brought about an improve
couraring of fifty sixty houses erected in the latter
wears of nv command the confines of government prop
er the greater part were put up by those IN
viii now proceed notice particulars in the testi
miller and Hobbs To ali that contained in this evidence
relative to the time OF piece refer to the shop
nothing required of piece-workmen not essentially
necessary il welreguated manufactures 1t may De re-
orkmen being permitted work before day and
in another of the difficulty Of getting there BY bell
morning. did the inspectors attend to see that the reg
uIaons were observeda With the opinions Of Mr. Moore
the late armorer armory matters have nothing
10 Of his facts must notice The hundred dozen
files which he says cost Va 90 the Dozen ana wnen were
ntendency, bought was told while Mr. Moore was master
them to be
practicable in the armory and when removing them from
all that could be used for any purpose selected the
mander nvenored for two three years as being Of
interior quality, WIN inc reeoenaaaom aas 5 @
successfully exchange them with our dealers and they
were finally according to reguaon Inspected oy the nm m
fault fault there Mas consisted in rs9evng Gaa M
NOW ior Mr. lillian H. MGore ,h ~" t , s Of WY
mems wages because they making too much Evidence
Of similar character to this given by Mr. khueman mr.
aggeraon have already explained the principles on which
the prices ior were anu W." ~
IN nina that every cnange anu ~, ~ =
py increang .ne isu . o f t;ua and s
S0r @sen therefore, the
new macnnery WAS grealy acltasg ne ops .hs
changes in the price would be made and the
inspectors were airec.ea " .nS sne % h 20, If
days hours on particular by striking the
average aar price ior me " az. ~
was supposed the workmen had reason 70 expect
price 1t may nave happened IN inc menoneo
the evidence that they d NOT expec. the price
borne in the was reduced except in conformity to
was 70 communicate 70 the inspector from cotnpa anus
however being made to me by workmen that they knew
aog ~ ns aeuuIon ~ tne Roc a' des oau " ;
ceive their pay RUE was adopted that an price
should De made known IN ns month preceding that IN which
they were to take effect the change was to
the price took elect IN the beginning the current month
II the part Of the
owing to the not to use harsher word OF the
inspector. ms rule, my recollection serves me- must
have been IN orce some as much as two years
before Mr. Moorss dismissal and during the remainder OF
and M ocers could hardly ard no
81 x BE- showing that men eoueov
two dollars day for high
as two ana nan settle the point as TO their Pc
mers evidence The story of the forging Of the cocks in
which the name Of the workman udcousy withheld, is
instance nee ,,.ou.,. -
In Mr. Moore ne speaks OF the habit of workmen
citang them from pursuing their trades elsewhere This is
measuraby true and the conviction that the effect was in