The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-06-28

this tresy settle forever at least IL hopei) thi
cloe all debateable ques ions. Mr Iri>t under Presi
dent Poi offered fit en- million. for the right Of way
We gel more than this for ten millions lie reeiis
to Mr. Benton DENYING that the priv leges the ous,
have teen invaded ~ the nego istion o. This treaty
j MIR. HAVEN, (whig) Il " Y, said he understood Mr.
| Jones tax ng ground others who proceed him
hsd that The House has tie constitutional right "a
men' and g. Cd sense, II for the of the oun
tn, That being so, he did not design Say a VOID
cheney and the only subject the tce az the treat
snd the brief message which the PreaAsot has thought
NJ 10 lay leiore tbe House We find IT an
teceoent treaties The treaty Of Guadaloupe Hago AMI
the treat, OF amy of 1881 With regard 10 the eleven, h
criticize tie construction put by the gentleman
fnnsylssnia, (Mr. fones) ana others, was that put
on by The last administration which he proceeded
TO SHOW He die not kno~ What he onght do with re-
gard 10 ills treaty He had heen told by learned gen
tlenen that the House has the right to withhold the
appropriation. That is question Of expedency and
good faith But only III g ha had 10 act on was the
simple test of the treaty lie would take that and be
satisfied II It stood there, and there alone. He ten al
uded 10 the rumors aoat concerning the move
mepts Freezing the negotiations Of the treay-not il
reIorf was true, creditab'e 10 all parties II was there
for due that the correspondence shou be laid before
MI AYIrY (vhie) OF Va. asked whether the gentle
man II ew of where the correspondence was pub
clu ngeds
Mr. HAVEN replied the gentleman had had more expe
risree thar he had and that he did not profess to
lrow. T. however, The pondence was aot given
they must oe III he dark.
Mr. BA,ia said tie treaty speaks for itself In con
nectop with diI lonacy with Mexico there was no
nted for the doer nenis.
Mr.. HArEE remarked that al The ton furnish
ea was he face OF The treaty He had according 70
the unent to vote yea Or nay but the right
to know he contents of the corresronpence He asked
Mr. Bayy whether IT, outside tue message of the Pre
mt, The treaty fraudulent aniadverse inter.
ests OF the country be would vote the appro ?ration
because the treaty sIole for itseliS
MIR. EAlLY sad, in the construction of legal instru-
ments, hi opinion they stand themselves. He
old not believe much 10 protocols explanations which
fhar,b NV mo danra
the arguments of counsel not affecting the judgment of
the When he had IL treaty tore him. and had
the anecedents, he should be very likely to have his
judf nj mt satisfied rs 70 its bearings and effect
Mr. HAVEN replied, he would too when he had the pre-.
treaty
Slr TAYLOR, (whie) of Ohio understood Mr. Jones' (of
La to assert that President more offered the Mexi.
can government Fix millions dollars to get rid of the
eleventh article in the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
BE asked Mr.. Haven whether be had any Information
official or otherwise, concerning that subject
MIR. HAVEN had hesitation in commun eating what
information he had So far he knew Of preceding
administration il had no kitchen cabinet: and no man
who prileged to enter and obtain information by
the tack door He had Eeard Of such a PROPOSE
ton berg made as that alluded to by the gentleman
from Ohio; did he believe it made. He re-
Ieaied he wished to know more Of what the gent
from Virginia (Mr. Ba,ly) calls the antecedents-the
Mr. PAyry, interruptng, sad-when he spoke Of ante.
cedents he did not aude t. the but he
meant the relations hch existed VIGOROUSLY and openly
between the two governments not diplomatic correspon
dence.
iADEN repeated, ne wanted to all the circum
stences There men able to vote without further
information, such his friend from Virginia He was
not Of the administration in its just purposes
He asked whether it was not duo 10 those at HE other
end Of the avenue that the changes TO which he had al
uced should be put to rest this treaty for retro
baed He had confidence however, that the CORE spon
dence. if produced, would put these to rest
Ar. PHILIPS (dem) of Ala, denied that this House
certain constitutional rights but We have no pyileees
the word is used relative TO the legislation of this
country, In the British authorities, lind that the
tS thn nfniu nf off,
He replied at length TO Mr Benton dissenting altogether
from The opinions Of that gentleman.
ex lar alton He had b. accused act for which,
were h" guilty, he would deserve TO be expelled. He
stree srIearec H. the New York Daily Times purporting
Ia be sent from ibis city
s.oundins f'aSa has g,.,een discovered BY Mo;:
Mr. richardson stated TO s soure that hi. sub
dayton provo when in fact lie haa ms ro oiaus pro
states shan o ssI vote S Ss Of as uS
the PRINCIPLES If the hill
Mr. C1yPrrrI, (free soiD Of Ohio, desired to say to
the spteman and the committed inasmuch his
name mentioned in the despatch, that in various
conversations this subject he said he regarded the
DOSAGE OF the Nebraska bill great fraud but he de-
sired soy to Mr. Richardson that at time did no
intend TO charge the gentleman with porpetrating wilt
ful fraud.
Mr. RrcHARnsoY-To / understand the gentleman to
say ever I,rretrated any fraud at aiS
Mr. C,MBEI replied, no. thought Che passage of the
bill was violation OF the rules. Some months ago,
when at one, received tslcgraphc despatch
urg ng me to return to Washington, as il believed
the friends Of tho Nebraska bill intended to take
| snap judgment the abseDters. Ny con
| stuepis became alarmed. and urged to
turn. I said TO them, ~ know the gentleman MR.
Richardson inca pablo of committing a sna % judg-
mert for my intercourse with him during tho pending OF
tie Intimate and persons and SO far from,
hay ng such design knew he would take such ad
vantage thought his had been open and frank,
Ierha much to the foes to the friends Of the
| bill and at no time could discover the of the
gentle man effort to take improper advantage. still
hold my opinion that the Nebraska bill passed in
4 violation of the rules
Mr. RIcHARDsoN-I am perfectly satisfied with the
gen,l' mans STATE ment it is clear and full salts
fed, the who sent tho dispatch had authority
| from i'm to make the charge desire here to brand
tie hors and endorsers Of the Dispatch whoever and
wherever they may be, as Infamous liars H. then pro-
ceeoed prove establish the Of his denial
ferrng to The card and saying he had merely restored
in the bill the words which MIR. Claytons amendment
| struck out
Mr. Kn1T, (dem.) of S. Co. made few observations in
support Of the pending bill and indicating Mr. Gdsden
in reply to Mr. Haven who afterwards rjoned, saying
4 justice
Mr. GHRRnr SMITH, ablition) of N. y, said he moi
troubled about The papers; they had right to them
whatever If The treaty has been approved BY the Mex
authorities and by the President and the Senate
is law IN the language of the constitution, part Of the
supr Law Of tie land. II is law whether not the
House approves it, and law which Mexico enforce
this nation and it is binding The nation 1t is
Law, and all have to do is to obey it, unless II is
y and violently wrong, and cannot in good conscience
be obeyed. He gave his views on liberty and State
would not consent to wait FIR Spain If this is hiibls
| ttrng male the most of it. (Laugh,cr) Will
| him 1t vas question of human rights and
philanthropy. He did not subscribe 10 the doctrn,
that the american people slaves Of the government
The OF $loO00,o0os 70 give for this trea
ty $1,000 COO Is largo f. looked the treaty
in the language Of the day. imperative and void for
| want Of the money U.aughter)
Ar. GiDIlNGs OBJ aimed the floor but yielded it to Mr.
Feclhs who sale II had been suggested by the gentle
man from Alstama that he not IN earnest ia calling
the President for the correspondence relative TO Tho
| treaty.
Mr.. Housroy denied that he said any such thing.
| Mr.. TFcFHAM replied the call made for the very
purpose stated in the resolution. He asked tho commit
tee 10 rise, in order that he might submit it to the
| House.
Mr.. Houston desired TO cay the resolution yesterday
| roJosed 10 be offered at no late period.
Mr.. rEcKBAM svid the correspondence had been lait
before the Senate and IL could be hero by tomorrow II
tin e for the five minutes debate
The commite rose.
Mr.. PEcEBAM asked leave TO offer his resolution There
being no quorum present Mr.. McMUES moved that thu
House adjourn.
NJ Lur, us aid NJ n, coud not tho infor