The Yazoo City weekly Whig. (Yazoo City, Miss.) 18??-1855, 1854-09-22


In nkVH kEtcE We en- heartily
second 6 wish 81 eur colen porasy q ne
Baltimore American lbnl tie country pos.
aesssd some statesman elevated q paifiol
a1a commanding & influence Nhoss
oia6 could Sc heard throughout she land
rallyine d is bid tie cons fgatire maje.
IS 81 sections md bidding northern fanat-
a1ism and southern ulltaism Frsesoil ag
ession ard pro-slavery agitation can BE-
l We are tired 81 this everlasting COM
notion shout neerodom the southern peo-
10 are tired ST ST and they want peace and
Wet lit can be obtained Withont Tie sac
riho. of their inalisnable.
i When lhe question IF tie repeal q she
llissos Compromise vas presented % them
Iby No bern ssnasosslhey naturally took
sides ID lasos 8 shat repeal. IA s1islance
vas I'd odio and unjust discrimination
against lie sou ara when the opportunity
vas afforded i moYe that discrimination
tie great mass d &c southern people ielt
lit duty they owed d themselves and e
their institutions ID cooperate Il effscling
Its removal. Whether ssnlled e any
practicaI dyanpge 70 them q pot var PCT
much matter q considel Ion g vas
lie population Of j principle unia snd az
ld.Repo hlican. they only asked Ct slslr
Northern Brethren % p adnisled on equal
.efms With them into ne territories q y
Uniled sta common properly of Ell.
IThey congressional legislation
mailing itories slave states bu'
lthey did and bad right to ask for ihe re-
peal II such cor ressiOnal Legislation e
made shem free ststes
Was this demanding too mucn of the
Northa Isit iail lhatour Northern breth-
zen should insist upon ne interposition Of
Federal power 10 aid them II making free
states out DC public domain By prohibiting
die citizens 81 ne South from Al equal par
tieipalion shrein North would never
recognize the power of Congress e inter-
and rlalxe sla states then - ga
les. lit has Gil i the oae case
has in the other JET tho Norsh would RI
sist Is the last the exercise Of am such pow
81 IS tie former instance vii hey ask
for Il themselves hat which they refuse otis
ers and to which others have as much right
IS lie have? The whole question has been
forcibIy illustrated by showing that the peor
BE 81 the territories are as much entitled
70 the right 81 disposing Of he subject Of
slavery Of in other words their domestic n.
stitusions az tie lime Of admission Is state
4 any soveaeign state Modern Of sOuth>
ern has; and IBIS IS al shat IS requir-
ed.
Having obtained Dis ID reference 70 the
territories 81 Kan and Nebraska the
South S content as q tie existance q
slavery IN those territories it IS matter
that must b decided 81 the natural course
81 events. The South has taken % steps 70
I'll up those territories with slave Holding
emigrants 81 theaid Of emigrant societies
81 % enter into any sort Of 4 scramble for
The ascendency there She IS content with
The right for southern emigrants to remove
into Kansas 81 Nebraska with their slaves
and that right she intends % maintain
whether her people choose to Sc there q
not
The J, Courier IS right when / says
ID late Issue ofthat paper that; II Ne
are e judge 81 ne general silence Of their
Journals The people ofthe south take lit-
tie concern ii the struggle which has been
going on for The control fthe tWonew ter
riiories. Having essayed 70 assert prin-
eiiple b Wiping tic Missouri compromise
line Of SO. so. out Of ezlention farther Ii
the Nortn gain tie practical advantage n
tie snd 81 Kansas and Hebraska coming Is
as Free States let them have L. While
hey gain thai advantage By the free and
nntiamelea q sion Of DE people of hose
territories tie South WilI never object but
let them gain It IL thai way not seek
q con Tie Federal Cove snt into 8
machine for manufacturing Zee territory
Or into "a instrument for destroying Gle
rights and privileges q The people Of any
portion q &c conIsdeac
They hoas nov that they I'LL gain every
adHansge Is Gle end that Kansas and
Nebraska mus rid VII BE lree Then
Why longer continue Eiong Why seel