New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-30
Law LNIE'ZLIGENC.E.

SUPREME CoURT-sPEeIu TERA-Before Judge koo'E'
DECISIONS.
John G. Helm agt. the Farmers Insurance Com
p.py Of Oneida CoMoon open default denied with 80
Casper c. Childs agt John Mousley and another
Order Tor appointment Of receiver and for continuance oil
the bSmnS sg Era CbspmsnMoon
TO continue the preliminary injunction denied without
Nathaniel $: GIswold agt. George T. Power ct al.
-Def.nlt opened, with liberty to defend and 80 costs
Mary NJ. DE Graw &c. agt. Jasper DE Graw.-
Order granted, referring back to referee
POINTS IN THE ABOVE.
Helm ast Fsrmen' Insurance Co. of Oneida Co.
This suit on policy on property destroyed
BY the ere in sPruee IN March s: P.uh resGysFed
and M q As gI SP the
tilted The PLAINTIFF clsm the motion open the default
obviously for delay and must therefore, be denied with 80
Chids .st. Mouseley Ell al
This was an order TO show cause why an Injunction
should not be granted and receiver appointed.
When debtors choose their gnee the Court
sa II H. es,s smoun. 70 .bou $1,000 The s..rnee
Young under years of age, and. IL alleged OF little or
nor esponsbe but assertion without proof su
feient said ths. Walter Mead the father wa. the In
but the word Junior appended 70 t. aud
w M JI, claims TO BE- assignee.
Independent. Of this the creditors wish for change and the
be attended To- Order for appointment Of receiver and the
H'uN'''" Dsning ast. Chapman.
Injunction TO compel defendant to keep secret
The plaintiff in July obtained temporary Injunction restrain
n selling teaching the art or Invention OF
marbpz IRON other articles he having obtained said
and an order granted 10 show cause, &c
The defendant reply say. that the Invention va. that Of
, nd he latter improperly gave 1t to Deming and
the latter right to his present suit against Chapman TO
Tn Diced that the art when revealed Williams.
oply in ts incpient state but william, diyuged
oply week serwsrd being perfect From this and other
the Cour, feels bound TO consider the invention
complete when KNOWLEDGE Of IL was obtained BY williams
rfsh edngO f n
the Judse thinks Harding ss,n,t Williams and others
But in the matter Of invention, the sE recognizes no ash
cure to psiene the sh to his invention for fourteen years
how proceeding Of hi. kind be enforced The
brought into Court The moment the investigation takes place
cr, nov. no way BY which plaintiff can redress.
he consider. himself ssseved bot by action at law Mo
GIiswold against Power
Where an inquest was alleged to have been irregu-
l,rly tsien. Defsult opened.
nay De Grsw against Desrsw.
In this case there has been an order for SALE Re
feued back
NJ Fdvd SANFORD Of the counsel and had p.ry
beer argued, psssed over TO the next calendar.
The apple alton by Pitt, liquor dealer in the Ninth
w,s for RanS.mu. against the Alderman Councilman Of
the Twenty ninth District was laid over to next Saturday
SUPERIOR COURr-GEsERsL TERN-DEcIsfoSs.
CASE OF ALEXANDER KYLE.
An appeal from the decision of Judge Oakley, some
time since denying the molten the order Of arrests
M which defendant Secretary Of Harlem Railroad Co..
held 10 bail In $1,000 and still in custody then brought
81 iT s.hdod for the co@p.ny Il eoateadea that
the defendant liable al only the parties holding the
alleged fraudulent s-ues Of stock and not the Company De
eson reserved =.
Appeal from order veeating an order OF arrest
The order had been granted affidavit setting up
that the debt h,d been audalsntly contracted and also
hs IN. defendant had made fraudulent distribution Of bis
nv BY sale On the motion before the Judge % yae.te
he order shown eoleusvely that the debt was not
re-. but il eonended that the Court sill bound TO
td that distribution fraudulent and the order OF
rest should be conferred
this Court 10 analogous this II there held
th.t the Court would b. governed alone By the tnten
~ nj. PAR really existed aud that IL not be in.
uut.d by construction Of law That deeision Ltno1sn
made BY dnse Judge ". approved By the whole and We
provon for example inserted IL requiring party 70 sell
on credit when perhaps the intention TO prevent
OF the property va. an evidence Of iraH Ice S" o. ~
yoiS bot should hold that evidence Of Trad
IN wu ct Up in the Original affidavit that the sse-whieb w
secret defendant .ns defendant continued
This also efuted, snd IL shown that me
ale m,se eonhdenti. eiss Of smother ksss-sho
.ery-who paid IS down and for he balance
and entered immediately into poss.0n The ALE va. n.d.
by The assent Of sever, eredo. who though pTaden;
| course Order vsearng ares, affirmed
| AAthevs AT Beach.
Motion to dismiss tie complaint because the case
rot ,D.ss b 70 L , Ssss T nsS. ' e1: '
| Cs<ks Az Underwood =,
This was acton for commissions. The defend
ant set up oasst loan Of ESQ PAnts Wished % -
s u deter ass TS he Jadss :. special term denied
sne sppesl q made JSdsnsHi Alarmed
| Dovs sst Perrin
| Oues.son A 10 form Of Judgment After decision o.
sensn terra Plaintiff contends shOad Include e's's Of -
] peal Latter sloved