New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-20
srrpyRtnR onrRr-ssfore Judse DUE.


.,,r ron ,IIrGyp sLAsDER ASSAULT AND BATTERY,
r.rsr IMPRISONMENT AND cossPIRAcY-HEAvY
VERDICT.
lame, Ts,Or AT Leuuel Drsper and VIM C., George r.
'"A' and John L. Draper
NJ Ta,lor WA bookseller in this City. His wife,
Nrs T.. to whom he was married some years ago. is
daughter of defendant Lemue and sister of the other
aessndsts He brings suit to recover damages,
charging az above.
It appeared that on the 5h Of May last Mr.. Taylor
siied he keeping store at the time at No. II Annst,
and made an assignment for the benefit Of creditors
Mr.. Geo. w. Stillmsn beirg his assignee.
Mr.. T went to Cincinnati, bat returned-his wife
Ewing with her father and had been soforsix months.
X is said that defendants went down to the store be
tween and II O'Clock in the morning. aud asked the
assignee what time Mr.. Taylor would be in, and re-
auesed the assignee to vacae he premises and leave
fhem alone with Mr.. T. when he did come in-thus
eopspiring against him. When he came in, which
WAS after short time, the whole four, it is
said in language commenced a violent assault upon
bim charging him with. .aaving married into the
hmDy ana os..f tracing it, &c that they had got his
we way from him, and that they intended to keep
osr away.
He requested them not to communicate with him,
except by friend he did not wish TO have this con-
venetion. They insisted upon speaking when ne
tried TO get away but Of the sons 1t is said held
ne door thus impressing him. while the father took
him BY the coat-collar doing so several times, and
plaintiff irving to work himself away-duriDg which
fhey used toward him very violent language. Finally
he succeeded in getting out by back door. During
fhe remarks il s stated they said he should not live
IN New.York, they would drive him out, and would
make it too hot for him, &c.
Testimony was presented, Mr. Baniel Il. Taylor ap-
pearng on the part Of plaintiff. No defense was OIL
Tered The Jury gave verdict Tor palntif oil Ooo'
SUIT FOR ALLEGED Loss by FIRE.
Frederick Henry se the Liverpool and London FIRE and Lille
Insurance Co.
Guttavus Pepet was insured SO, 900 ON the stock
of furnshir In Fourth Broadway He says
occurred his store about 10 o'clock Ia the evening"
BY which be ost goods 10 the amount OF o ne assigned
% plaintiff for the benefit Of creditors who brings suit 10 re-
the amount In defense said that the loss was mot
$3.50 $3.50 The Jury verdict for plaintiff OF
alb For pitt Messrs Judah Dickinson. For defdt
NeDrs A. Hamilton & j. w. Gerard
HEAVY CLAIM.
Jean b. DorrAh John C. Leberthorn.
Plaintiff is q merchant at Paris, defendant Is also
merchant doing business In kewYork The suit to recover
said be due The question Is whether defendant
considered in law having bought the goods OF acted
assent Verdict for plaintiff $4,000 subject to the opinion
Of the General Term.
ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
Michael Hammell aEt. Christian Msthas
The parties were in a store on 18th January. They
rot nto words about suit brought against third party
when 1t said descendant severely beat the plaintiff causing
him some time be H. In defense is said the
psntis also assaed defendant Verdict for plaintiff cents
For plaintiff Mr. ChAs H. Smith and Mr. Clinton For defend
ant Mr. H. Il Morange.
John B. Becker sgt Third sv. Railroad Company.
To recover damages for death OF late John Decker,
already referred to- Verdict for plaintiff cents defendant
st,pulsiins to psy plaintiffs COSTS in the suit.