New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-06-15

bns drawn toward the staten Island shore By .es referred
to- u so against the cargo and 500 against the vessel
IMPORTANT DECISION IN ADMIRALTY.
Samuel p Robinson The ship Medors
The bean sues TO recover compensation Tor services
agent in procuring freight and 'O the snip 'Oi
The hP wa. owned by George Trenholm others Charles,
The hP being in his port in 1852 the bein applied to the
CITY drawn dated September 3 1852 aud
sssd BY Caldwell Co to which the Oeian wA' the witness
By that agreement Caldwell Co agreed TO sell the ship 10 Mrs
uy her for paybe in 60 DAYS date the hP
should sail Caldwell Co were TO hold The shP uSt the money
the purchaser the ship be responsible therefor The Pu
chase money paid and the ship was lost on her voyage 20
Australia execution Of the contract John G. Fri pro-
S eonroi Of her, procured freight voyage employed
the leu and the lbeant Performed services
The respondents that the lbean, has claim against them
a. ell under n. Sc i ana DO i len a. All for sueh services
Eeuc him 10 .hp husband whose duty Is 70 perform such
of eyedore slowing freight after has been procured for
yhh as has been St ao h ess. bslsa Ss cas-
the steyedoe and the agent 10 procure iregh Inc
The former actually puts them board and receives ard slows
them. It would seem on principle that ths se %
ard by which brought ABOUT ought no TO be con
BuL The esse Of against the ship St Mary decided in this
on sPpss X the U1 o. s sofs oI' pe SG
freight contract made with the owner VIII se, 70
time Of performing the services and such Is therefore theia" Of hs
colit. .,, ,,. al ,or,;es.
the request OF who not would have len II tne
party the ship and having control er oT the 'oy
prohibited BY the from making such lien aad the party
the services prohibition the time OF ms
perform them, he cannot have lien against the
The contract may rood maritime sgains; the party
contracting. but would not give lien on the ship
the party who performed the services was nothed ha pc
persona responsibility OF The one with WHOM ne
has for their performance aud not 70 the hp-he cannot
the ship lie look the ship for security
when performs the services and unless he does lien At
He by have lien against the express pro
o the be Affected BY the lien
with John C. Erler to perform these "
vices amer the execution of the agreement Of sep and kooe
Caldwell deposes that about tat time ae
bean that whatever done for the snip 0y any Que
ms. Erers personal responsibility aud not on the credit OF
the ship or her owners ,,..--.....
received such notice he can have no lien o1 ms 'e
His rght to such lien has been waived.
The Caldwell is competent witness be-
vslae signed by Caldwell Co. Agents
for Trenholm Co" But the bond signed By Robert cad
BY and could therefore b- Dnnns
him within the authority 10 bind M y
executing stipulation unless ratified approved ~ me
other partner Caldwell being shown have done 40 not
hound stipulation therefore interested 10 the event
The ,uL
If E,r the execution OF tbs contract septen
her Of the ship she then do
r.iic vessel such lien admiralty law,
ard supplies Such services those rendered
surely Do entitled the higher eonsdera
ton.
Libel di.uissed with