New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-06-28

f ,h., Coy.rpm.nts and Del Vale commenced the en-
G.tm.r and vet he was only tool OF Dillon. Dilons
rephip for Boubon may easily be accounted for The
latter il Young of progressing appearance and
address cultivated mind. He Is an editor Of rcpu
tntou bold and skilfu soldier, Count descended from
the roya family of the Bourbons and IN tne man who
mnk friends Of all with whom he comes IN contact and
whore IL s hard 20 ioresee And certainly no more
ure.umvtion lie against Dillon than against certain Fed
,ral oces who profess distinguished regard Tor GER
tain American ibusers Finally lng- assertion tha tne
Grand Jury brought the Indictment a; their own instance
and the ustigaion Of outside person u not True
L. that Grand jury emf aneed the witnesses ha
been called testify before them against Dillon
was at the instance Of the Grand Jury that the
Witnesses called. Gen. Wool said IN ms
xrination that be had prepared evidence for the case
Bat how can Gen Wool and Mr. Insc pretending be-
.ve that the Frenchmen Of the Challenge had enlisted in
tie Mclean army ard that Count Raouset would make
hl~iors Of them il he could them justify
for permitting the expedition depart. There
was quite a. much evidence against every on the
Challenge as against Del Vale. ka"u--et could 20 By
land wiilou, difficulty, and lie might yet. and he
doultedly would 90 If his schemes ami Dnon were ~
r. represented Bat Count RaOUsset i no; quite 80 Quxotc
A. o in, ae sonora the head If body OF unarmed
pledged in hone and honor 10 serve the Mexican Gov
eminent dislike TO say any thing against lngc, for ne
attends hi- business is in most respects good
District Attorney, don't NEEDLE win dirty political
sch. m~- k other Federal officers, does what he
does wiki al. MS might and has most refreshing supp
If bulldog courage and obrtnacy But let II be noted that
Mr. IDce the District Attorney who supposed io
have winked, during l. days, al aker from Jlst Sept
,s-9 when ia. Arrow was seized hy General Hchco cA
III; III. 18th October when the Caroline sailed. That dur
inc those DAYS Nakers projects were secret; that
hi~ ~ ns and gu munon found the Arrow; that
hi, men were cater-d around the city; that he i'm
uudet a. 10 sue Con Hitchcock $50 600 damages; and
here wa Mr. Ingcs zeal for the Neutrality Law then
here his indictments brought by Juries without III
scaton from persons outside Did not General Hitch
cock zeal against the fbusges directly indirectly
LEAD 20 a decided GOODNESS between himself and Inge
Pubic opinion here il almost unanimous in condemnng
tie pros highly mpoliic in national point Of
view and r. unjust toward Dillon. Fir.y, he is the
chief diplomatic and commercial agent with mags
eria Functions. Of The French in California who number
2 0OO understand little English, have many difficulties
with tie Americans and in all their faculties TO him.
lie possesses Tor these and on account OF his pru
don't character croa, influence He has not been very
popular because the most Of the French here are Demo-
Gratis bu; this affair has made friends for him OF all the
French. .>ocoHoiy. if Mr. Dillon violated the law he
communicated the facts freely to Gen. Wool, who ought TO
have stated the law and did not Besides, Mr. Dillon has
made no .eor, of his papers regard to the affair he
having published nearly all the documents used in eyi-
ience against him. Ih,,diy Mr. Dillon acted with proper
motives 70 break up Raoussets expedition. FoaTthy,
The expedition will have bad effects, or if II have the
United States officers may be- charg able for having per
miited TO depart FJtiy Because after me arrest and
conviction al Del Vale. there not apartce oi danger
o repetition of the oifC And, strhiy because the
prosecution bad feeling between the French
and Americans at time when It is highly Important to
both governments to be in harmony The motives OF tue
Trial generally SUPPOSED TO be spite on the part OF Wool
and Inge toward Dillon, for his victory i'll The aitachmen,
case and desire to disgrace him, 80 that The Amnsra-
ton could apologize for their III arosng HIN on
tia. OCCASION Thai apology il made would OF course oe
! q condemnation OF their course. Whether Dillon was
technically guilty depends the meaning given to his
quest 10 Chauvitcu s. Cavalier, to make the list OF men
who be told that they should We year in the
amy in Mexico. am inclined to think that he was gull
~ but doubt whether there intention TO bind any
Of those TO enter the army of Mexico Dillon never de-
MED that he looked upon the expedition and s departure
with favor He might have quashed the indictment but
! that would have injured his
In the midst of Inges closing argument a disgrecefu
scene occurred From the beginning OF the Footc
had made practice of jumping up at every pretext and
making speech. lnge said that the counsel for the de
ionse betrayed the weakness OF their cause by hgey and
! rEorksush anxiety. The word stuck litter passed
around the ROOM Foote demanded an explanation lnge
refused explain there and Foote struck him. and they
separated The Judge was weak enough to let them
off with apologies though Foote said that gentleman
could not act otherwise than he had done.
The fine OF l.500 on Watkins and Emory IS nullity
because the Judge had too much regard for them to i'm
prison them TILL paymen Walker Jarnigan and Snow
have been indicted for participation in the Caroline e1pe
ditinn