New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-06-09

,A. character and Description have T. SAY, IN ~hY 70
49,, rssae who telNs abcu, my speech y b,s'on, ny
.,,,l h,c hing hcrc ~ permit myself 10 DC oauet VI
hs's az whs, have said in The hall or elsewhere
49, M No, cot The power Though hers ser,N 10 u 10
sar, wha ehs say and whcrc shall speek lhavo peen
80 hee 70 ic Scnllpmon crack their whips over mo
~ ,,,.t nsl rs>ail Noemcn with language Ike that as
,hs.sA ,lsy view MT acquainted with their rights lie,
H. understood an here a. memeVr "' nus oony ny we
-ss Al ,s,A aud the favor Of my constituents. viii
,n.tn he rights of both. have mol HsNod projections
rssa 30 vii let this body know L. ash The House
..,ci s,lf and the purity and dignity ot the repro
nS,,,ys character. Ii rccllcct Alright my colleague
s,Asr ,cira 70 espel the reporter ct Ihf t"HSSs
H. holding p S"SssSs 90, 0,,, @ s 'U '
ana ha"l I viii say 10 the E,,nVv"tn
e," ,rsira, ,Mllscu the resolution is rearly IN rae
sssS hosesge uscd when eNpeL"s 'ss TP" y ne Demo
.r~sc lSrsy cf the Rouse As to The wpS1's s' %
ss,- Nncw NJ, who they are thcN may p' s"f h;
- ,,i h,,S mn an assassin Inc h,n who dy"rcs IN re
Isr. tAi. w,tring t. men ot the wHH, lN've
o. sVSVrd and lei rAS,orN kn'" ""V mcS d. crinton
man Who writes an article w SUI" , b,n, NOV
sal ~ war constituents ana N' ny" """ ho
s.spd it. lie may TsS mV ,,r va, hc !" No i"'
SsN.,wal Nave that power or authority Not expecting
y. =, c~upv the aocr, appeal to every 'ndNihuh
ee ~, ~ N tolerate man who writes soch articles
sos'"> y, h,h he had referred. IL has been suggested
-, n - r,s an editorial article. but 4 H. under another
80. shall rot argue the r~pNnslolhy OF editors Tor
- ,seV put firth The presumption Is that NJ: Nch-
-, -, The article under smother name to hide him
- MN che public. He has placed 1t before the country
~ ne Mouse and tr this le him be held Responsible
NJ JONES fT,nnA hcrc referred 10 the records oshow
~ rs,N,irrs expelling X tribune reporter for giving
. resrs description of The domestic habits M r' paw
W., sacA as eating sausages in the lo5hos ana coniend
In Inst case and tins were not analogous IN 'h' '"'
a. Is ~ psNlcre.
HE SrgAKER said The question Of privilege as enter
.SirS,; not based On what SglV"''" i" 4 I'd" ''' w
AZ The resolution itself. ,,,
Nj OipS, 10 not propose TO question: 'ue 'onuuo'"
nv c,ssue for What he mas o'.n nOss ~ :" w ar
-, HIM before this body. fer accusing me
az c,hsrs Of his colleagues gave 'hSr woes LOT
~ Nebraska hill under the nAueace OF bribery ana cor
,urt,,n Hu Slude 20 for the purpose OF showing
iAs tbs appeal for pTo'oSten does nor come ron nun
., s.,t ,;ty and there assassin like stab private rep
r,,,n IN the dark when his colleagues were not there TO
rSplv to him. When he made the accusation he must
49, lpvn in his heart false in conception and Ut
NJ SIppINGS-Does my colleague speak for himself
A. oIpS-Ahi do | speak for myself or for others I
,,ssk r myself ard others; aud speak to him and to
rSsrs What said did not say in the dark nor IN B's
far whese the Ahc6onisis could protect me IN what
,.s IKE my colleague. What is on the floor OF the
ArsrSn Congress and for him and Others TO near that
b. vho comes here and asks for protection has
70 rirat TO claim it when he can go away
AID sssaxin like stab his colleague and give
xtterSnce 10 what is false IN inception and mas no exist
CO. e,ctpt in his brain But my colleague says he
os Dot seek protection for fear OF personal Violence but
pSntS The House 10 take of its own dignity If
rvocec, right there memorable occasion when me
Uouse ala undertake preserve its dignty-when the
conduct of my colleague was such that under vote OF
eszsure he saw I'll resign his seat Ike the man who
Nas Kicked down stairs, he said he LETT before the row
eonrDenced daughter. pretty thing 10 preserve the
dignity Of the House How long was II preserved nave
ALREADY sad be who comes here to make accusations shou
core with clean hands and pure heart. Can he do so
n tho-e colleagues who voted with him on certain ques-
tors FELT an apprehension of personal violence, why do not
thew too claim protection, If they cannot protect them
kelves Have they been threatened Did not the organ
o certain party cal on ncendiares to apply the loren 10
the Capitol and destroy the inmates beneath ns eru
isrn say: Cassus NJ Clay advises that traitors be pun
iAed as an example for all future time. Every man, he
remarks who voted for the repeal of the Missouri Com
promise deserves death but he adds there is no way
al L fic;ing the penalty. SO thought Horace Greeley
Therefore he called the ncendiay to apply The torch 50
thinks Wendell Phillips and Theodore Parker-and So
think stToDg-mnded women of the Northand 1t Is ad-
yed that they may escape the halter shall be broken
hague undertakes to do. How BY branding his coll
LEAGUES being brbed, and making statements false IN
inception and utteranee Break them on the wheel OF
public opinion Let them create public opinion You
cannot reach them BY blows. They have not the courage
10 apply the torch the Capitol but they have the per
courage TO 90 Boston and stab reputation and cali
o. their hearers crush those who differ from them in
- an comes skulkng back and asks the expulsion
~ The public printer for giving the truth it relates to my
colleague feel that have done my colleague service
for every attack made him by lover OF the C0nstu'
tion and the fanaticsm of the party with when ne
scts only helps to build him up and return him to occupy
sea, in this Hall. Ny colleague talks about kicking
sOuberrers into some kind Of support OF rght measures on
this floor He knows what il is to be kicked Ny col
le.eue was always of peace and has consistently
voted against all If personal alteration
should occur would be coffee for two instead OF pistols
for two move the resolution be laid on the table
Mr.. GIDDINGS-I hope my colleague will Withdraw
that notion N
ton. =, 49,,
Several gentlemen called for the reading of both the res
olu.ion and tie communication. The question taken up
on having the resolution the tablet agains: 30 No
quorum. 80. , -
The House was then called, when 1874 members an
swered TO their Question again taken on laying
the resolution on the table No quorum-79 against 81.
The House. 80 against 81, refused TO adjourn. Another
call Of the House ordered. m
could not he said keep quorum here for five minutes
and could not therefore adjourn until Monday but when
they adjourn LEI it be the understanding adjournment Is
till Monday.
The House then adjourned amid much laughter