New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-24
ii, coruupi,r mu,, have discovered the lamsu,able

slvss ofrbs ueus1 ,eA ss living % heavily bon toe
s, q the CITY. II NJ Esbsn hld aitrnGsd hat meeting
b. ussr.y they oustt % brg IN y,iaici Of
paIy cam'se' Bot tie widely diIerent lis motive
sheh ese, vo.er ooUe-rned IN saich every moral
every decent VsH eereerasJ Mr. Barr ser>us could
l.. s,eci.oH Ne ,ueeeseed N b. eiseSa Hsd indsei.
.bu.sd asi before Al eetou We b. to that ms whs
Al The world soke we'll The Learned then prOceeced
m.sps We cannot follow bin tarsush ii. extended ard
e,ots comment. He va. particularly severe on MI Bax
iryey Mr. Erben did None out the loves,
M s .roter point in he testimony Of s.1er whieh led
him suppose s be BROUGHT the stand for TIE
pose OF proving sIrrs malice Baxter that part OF
hs, Etbes sad was how he makes bis BY
I'M from <s to 800 from poor en fer police sppontnsn
go th vcry ssssvstis clause From his
evidence he that every charge eanAnsd IN ne
be sold police sPpOnttnenS s1e ,he genera e9AIss q
sorTSp0n, oe ~ sbe ,sls % John B.nt and By the
sale to Alexander NJ c. smith They had placed
w,rs bound 10 stand or fall. He knew that it fearful
responsibility he proof OF such charges ou men "a
S1v ON dr. oers.ion however much he might regret IT,
demonstrate that the paihH IN ths case VS. suA Q. ~
complaint would be perfectly answered they proved the
nTts Ct ms charge Issy had 0aeTS C' ss The Ja
would remember what difficulty they had In getting A y
tendance George Smith He frs, an involuntary
witness and but for single thing that oceurre in the open
without any Testimony whsiever rule Of law that
the man who offered bnbe equally suis with the man
who received H. and could be eompeed to ernnsts
hn'et Ths was especially hs case IN the ex.n,aaos %
to testify, upon the convenient rule that the answer
msh tend cTiuinate the mseye. When Mr. Barr brought
testify before the Recorder that one hsd even refused
sworn he knew that Geo Smith va. bis friend and that he
rule Of exclude Mr. Erben from proving the truth
oaps Drought that George j. smith in Court only s.r.
motion fer st'sehms9t asan't him had been made Tbs
give you eviderce this occasion he had made up
when Willard made that fatal mistake Of opening ths
so essery and Improperly as 20 70 aetgo'
why then this compelled for the pfotecth Of hls
be in position than that ie which be wss
placed by hs intimate end ehoseS friend ey nj: own
For they bosom friends NJ c. Smith knew ths very
suence 10 his favor he exhausted all his had
exhausted the influence Of a.. his friends; recommendations
d men The pripcpe th. the ANGLE had promised 70 the
nephew. At last nr. A. Smith was informed BY the
and get my nephsw to write that may sPpOn,
you. then viii appoint YOU Gentlemen had heard Q,
beesuss his unc nephew bot TIA, uncle had
he mssIsd @ to nd sai'O os TO d Ss
t. naS" %a11 mae s%iR 70 show that
hat we're VII, did ey not produce the which
nephew to the uncle They would that ne
ind Nj smith snd that when Mr Sweeney sent for him
to h, oee and said 20 n 20 pom Tsn yos S MD .
.esmed 10 bin like deam-lke the recoll eson OF dresm
take and could Mr. Sweeney be put the stand could
prove be mistake !, was not many years since that
called iR upon the witness showed him the ssed
mine was the answer but don't think il
Oh don't reeOllee that wa. signed BY so.nd:op
think now" Why your father wa. present when it
DONE After hsIf dozen such be succeed
missioner of deeds proved it, execution aud il Pot upon
record Some alervsd il wa. proved that the witness
mind mind does not begin to be understood yet n mad
Geo Smith 70 show that the appointment made IN
sequence of the letter and not OF the money mean this thai
Mr. Sweeney being the attorney upon the record for M Barr
he have sent for witnesses NJ doubt be acted
Nj Brady here somewhat proudly interrupted the gentle
He need not make excuses They asked for no
Mr. Whiting would speak Of connected IN any
,wsy with he honestly believed that they ought TO
all in all places He would this, that to the
least Mr. Sweeney acted @pIuSs1t e sending os our wit
for the gentleman who hsd interrupted him. continued Mr.
a1s rs, s9SS s ss @ e ~ as S
Of his client neither fear his criticisms nor do fear
EVIDENCE Of the Smiths He succeeded in reducing their
statements 20 tolenbly straishtfo,wsrd conclusive
hand writing that Barr did I'll the check or all
es with Barr. & Neither Of these
could give description Of his hand they had no clear
of the CHEMICAL BsnI M Psou. had paid only three
weeks $1,000 forged check This W" Abe kind Of
writing The most positive witness admitted close resem
bsnee between Of the letters in Bars name 10 the Cling
the check and the letters In his gedged sig
nature But after all IL YVES matter Of little consequence and
opey Tn r,sst question was sd smith lie Fpowia.y and
Purposey lie he explained the seeming eontsde9n De,
Of Geo BY uppong that there other applicants
whom Mr. Barr did wish TO offend By direct refusal IL be-
esppont M Bsht as faithful and efficient lie
SSssnt when tai in connection with that portion Of M
Bsxers evidence Of what Mr. Erbeu said the meeting that
BsS iS e l ow did that lie
thought that there singular coincidence here proving
Mr. Bsnt paid eloquent tribute his talents and his viz
He proceeded to the consideration OF the evidence In
relation 20 Tie character Of George Smith 10 regard 10 the
testimony OF the Chief Mr. Mse and other members Of the
Police ho up to de.d smith, n he .a sS'
Wet the testimony Of policemen alone their
them unreliable witnesses Against the SIX witnesses how
who testified against Smiths character none Of whom
the ten who testified in bis favor, no, there were
bu, nine, bat M Bsr ". the tenth Yes, ne Sss
In destroying the reputation Of Mr.. Smith, i was only
much the for the Alderman, for vas in evidence
man by the company he keep va. true 81
ole remark Of one Of the witnesses W.T. kognsoo
TO r.lsnd He spoke with pleasure Of h Irish descent
The s.,oD. ipuepee Of that hierarchy which stood between
Ireland her libery-betweep Irshmen and their God
which the dominance Of su;h
hierarchy in own eounuy-s power which denied mans
which Il successful would involve the hbeeso oar nsnse
lard n final ruin With these remarks he would submit I
interests OF h client The consequences 10 Mr. Broen re
nothing; the consequences to the country were
yindiessn Of her interests duty when ne gu no
perform But 10 this the Interests OF ns
parallel with hers and he believed that they "oa'
veraict in bis favor.
Us CIRCUIT coURT-Before Judge BITS.
The Grand Jury Mr.. Sperry toremanl was sworn |
,nS received n. chsrT. Of the Court after which they
tired for deliberation-
COURT cALENDAR-rHD DAY 49,
CIRCUIT CoURr-Nos. go, f', III, so, siJ, |
7f, rs 1855 500 S6T, $50 TO 6a -. 40
SUPREME CorRr.-SpeeiR Tsrm-Nos. lis, %, |