New-York daily tribune., 1854-05-12

T.s P,r Brsn seels Old man incompetent
With h mind az 5 ae ssa h sexual passion. out m
que,ion he Futses 10 |'fa eeaA respect 10
ffst st.v,,.on h,d lrou.A, into with
hre sas.equ I'D him eese hA intercourse hsd
r,ty rc, hen aud hsi he was !" 'anss' OF proc
~ Es on. Of the defendants had ,sreed
belief the old mans Haa and create inc ~ '
Ths was ssrsed hOs ain The old man MO the
beef Fd she1d pleeE5e Deeh 70 isSa n % % et he .U
urou u.Ey te paid over 70 Stevens and fea 70 F ~ ~
Toses rIo-.outon. ..- u,,..i Il, ,ovn ak
e,pt Dr. F.s. fhee and s,svso.ou'. hotel aud
That The intimacy between Ped aud ~ hi. soist AID
September and imHs sdasy followed oS 'Ns P'Ny Wv
Tist, plot and carried ihe is Nov BY
m,de the old man for whish note o G 10
given Deeh the noney dvdedst" TO sevsn'on and Wv
TSs smother ro, W.. eoue,y,d loan him 600 more ,pd
70 aid N rang the money aud thai tins was carried ou on hs
Nevts a. Fields house and tha me money sis. $50
Lreheror s. and Deh 500 besides the share OF Wv on H
g. Thai on he isi December Judgment taken By DeeA
10; lie snount hand with injunction o. secrecy
u,ou Tie sulserbns wines 1reer i'e'sA' 'i'f '' ~
H. That .e h arrest ef stevenson New Yoit and while he
", tfss Of too bad bssn 'ss4 b.. TsS a me
NJ Rssder Length the evidence gwen 70 prove ,H s'
he three important days hxed o
s h Ssh November and vent over me enIis hs o.
ard y hOPus h.t the Jury ~O1d e3s & 20 Ss%
~ HE NJ Wednesday The Court then took
By the tine the Court had reassembIed the Court-ouse
as aeI.e sad during the Judges charge the mo pro
found attention manifested
We give the substance OF the charge, as ioho"s
JUDGES CHARGE.
The Hon. Judge Mccartney said ~
C. Yed Daniel Lanhcror Dech Jane: stsyenSn sad
isaeae PeIs. oT etsaSs 10 10 n,dd st~ the Jurv have
scced Isse Parker and remains 9i yoa % o.
Ihs dt the Indictment charges eosspTsy ssaesSly 90
h cunt charges conspiracy procure Bes Green 20 bor'
ro Dech -5o usuous interest me oat.n IS4a %
uurou interest The hh count ehsges conrmay 70 Pro pVSus
Btr Green 70 make Dech Judgment no'e or t'u .
cc.aeralu oi so advanced by Dech to bcJsmin or'e
Ihe seventh charge conspiracy 10 seea'e shn
M Lee b such accusation aud BY hr as Of exposure
nd na ~ cusion procure om BENZ Green the
i q So snd $500 Each Of ihese counts 1te the hI Al
.,ss ha. the eousPeey va S,Iid IA 'H'it G coz @ o
the Conspiracy tie overt se; the cheating '',ei' S ah
aan IS" VI In the nyeseaou Of this question. l5
wi-re.s have t,en eSanned Their testimony hAs been u
yorr Ireeuce, end II rot my Purpqse now 20 b t5 conn,
10Th ~ elth sud for the d"ien wan minute
the examination Of tbs e' nee thsii ses % * raced
and of them wnc appeared io me deiehse ~ ]
Iee n nc o T ,ev6 be vain WORK TO repeat
YOUR fesng shaI limit myself statement OF some
Of lie main questions and psentaon Of some OF he ru,s sp
View Of il Lay dhted The s OF conspiracy IN such eai
e. iAe resent = IN eAi@" eonspircy 20 cheat l. a.
us TO mule anchor IA I.s PoP.i aS such conted
eesy en'l as Goaey to % Si,s sIs to be- i4 from al
ne % 80 ~ rsrticulsr result he who aids in the per
VIII yl'w TO 81 ~ et. in order to bring about result
Kt~rr whsi he Object have the intention 70 ehecu'ts
have the same dssu in fact an ssIeesn o,wre1 @ mum num-
srd them lis criminal u'en not 10 be dsnsusho on. NOS
who ht iemed the Plan oi IA. which the Jary can fairly
Ibe Commonwealth occupied several aays m Prodae,us
endins max ehalse &
Tby 4n rlGuced who tsed IN dHe terms - the
Gete aud Ascun OF conspiracy TINS eseh.' % !, h "S,
erg and by adGreins ohst ts'Dny 20 on
,se n ne s',s amen @ .d % n pesTsd io business
md brought by Stevenson luto
Cshsrrc Lee Il not deried hat Greene we qua & HI
fr n. money ud rom him jud n NJ Tor -t.< -
Ihat grent entered record IL no d.nd nat par VI
LES pdod gaiy 70 he charge 9ous % b mean. Of
he .icu Benz Greene OF his relations with Sahaue
Lee L,, Zen Gc Ttfscns whom he asked witness it, Further.
90 IN 4ie L: wss io9nd ~ s' chss al an Tb deoy.ry
M to0 was the anonymous letters The bank ae
@ h. on he Iih and enbe 1855 sums OF money
which would sns @ s two 20 hosnd five S1aded dollars The
Judgment e,scu.sd At Fields Office BEN Hs7qs aPphs :,
re with them and other, equally
arf. The vh the relative position ne parties eSa @
~ 81 h rcy charged Dech stands close upon side
Of in eeu Stevenson close the other Is there any
e.teett OF eouon with steyensoa either directly
Whai do yoG tds nm 'ne ,b o hoP aonu of d lGji
tsssd by cobnaon or collision win yenson or
eye o he evidence upon his point. This last question Of fact
arises of the Indictment l. Tor conspiracy 70
cheat Ben the Of usurous Interest Had Deeh
money 10 osnl Where the money paid IN hptecsng ns
Isaor n.- T hsl 9ilfi ssT TS ae 50 fGsir Kill testify
e,ey The Of their story with isei and win 9'nsf
H. fetq teir attention had aspect
he controversy And their contradictions BY opposi- e
These he plain and obvious test. oy wneh IN me
con 1n a IL M {1 G jury should see how far the whole
sSS be S Be- d eeaS nf e1S1 % usa aS
ss~os ~e.y sj:iGnl hsh saaet fi,ea~,aatsat 'qcy %
sccuu from different wnes'es generally
of the understanding TO reject the o.
n related One winter the New Testament puts the CTuelhNon
sah hour u the day another at the the tha hoH let no
rejected the main sct of me CruchHon
n fr vitf on reh subject in the timing OF such
may expected the testimony the lso witnesses that have
examined IN the preu: casei The care OF Jurors 70 recon
paucis ~ least not permit them 70 operate IN an
uuessolste Thus the testimony OF the ooy, Ololoh
Field Edwd RI hre OF teIfJke ond eager ABOUT e occur
r, the llL November e appear and ia
tbns. eeorcAbe Is Necessary to decide that one or
ecf. sed ~ hem may b though not how
.n,rey if e.'nS M sIsnd 81 O,her, vii daer in respect 20
dry when the deadatoh Dr. Fields house "ss pu on
tlu dshoutsy Where ysrancss cannot be 0nc led aud
~ n G coure dive credit that witness whose testimony has
Get Of be uas truths about Asan the particular thing 70
m rrrseiAtug testimony Of this example found IN the
t.ry Equ Buck in respect to he posion OF me etter
ssrOs r-sy directed to tie size Of The opening N he
ede By the letter he have overlooked me extension
Ccosy Tie iumsn mind views one nam obect al e aHh
nsso,s ccuHstsrees on which IL ntion . nor ny
d or rroyec engfhen aud s nconstency win e
h other omitted o. proved ises wesssns u w ~ 10
IT, 70 testify tsseJl Is aiee or H1Ie
cvele i to BE- taken altogether not piece BY piece When
L r 1tr nr;ed Thu the view Of evidence upon which
q