New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-11-14
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPREME coURT-GISERAL Tenn.
DECISIONS.
Jacob lie Roy sgt Il. W. Lowber
Indictment reversed, with coats of appeal end of


DECISIONS.
Jacob lie Roy ACT X. W. Lowber .
Judgment reversed, with coats Of appear snd Of
Court below end perpetual 10 junction granted
JrpGsFNI AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS, VIZ:
Weed sgt. Pendleton; Brewer end Cram at. Pea
tcS ce.; Niche kes:u '.s sat A BsTss. Ba:tsss
sSd Trust Co Chsdbourne Byrss; Wells sat Oates car
yoOh. Baxter wssIys A. a.. ET.t J rD.s T..
o Cha S1'sG aSi. 1 sS:s ,s J. R.osd
Transportation Co; Miin sst s Bar K.lloss
judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs TO
s''0s Phpie, Executor eat Pursy add vsrisn-
Indictment 10 be modified SO that Mrs. Vsrian have
other esstee' in the re'due-e0' TO be PAID from
ssbo.ra ard RospoEe Railroad Co .s wsrd-order sp
pealea from affirmed with costs. 81,
Indictment Of reversal and for new trial-costs 10
.d event. trial to be hsd before jury unless reference
ces,d at Legoux Judgment for defendant affirmed with
AIT spedksr-osder sPPeAled from reversed with
Lane .st Bssm-ordsI .airmsd: with costs
Judgment reversed. with costs OF appeal and oil
Court below and perpetual injunction granted
ABSTRACTS Oh THE DECISIONS IN ABOVE As PREPARED
BY THE JUDGES THEMSELVES
ROYAL Houghion sgt Peter C. Adami
Where an Exchange Broker purchases bank notes
Of another the Ordinary discount Of money
sDe he Ist s.s seus stopped psymen the day
but the purchase made In such case the "A"
~ .ot nd and tsken under mutual mais Broksa
tstL notes By ndessndios, are different Con-
"0ei'' nun sSuiih Eiy at Gsor.e Cool. ct al
An assignment made by debtor for the equal
ssnss o. ~ 9 n m III. upu. shall Be
10 the debtor II the debtor however, were, sad hnew
much hi: creditors; :, to gGes: sn;s 70.
and therefore sgsiDs creditors frsud9lep and void
ROYAL Houehton sst Peter C. Aesn.
oh hrok nurpha.Q-
Of another State s the ordinary discount Of uneurent money
ind turn. out that the b4ns without either party ne
TINE hsf, ~. Purchase wa. made IN .aeL
law implied PSon.s and s en,o,es u. n.
tsie BroIsn hank notes BY understanding are
different conn Sdi,y from u1e9 .sr.. coos
An assignment made by debtor for the equal ben
eft al It's creditors. Is not void merely because rroslss
-. ssbSf II he ssStor however and knew him
self be- perfectly solvent At the ne and me ~ We
prompt sales such s.snment sht f!y se considered a.
I made for ID. Us. e. the psiy maxim, .sa i %. sane
| Jacob lie Roy sst w Loweer
When a written agreement for the dissolution OF
NopSs, following eeTis1 machinery By the terms Of Il
to one q bs parties. Ssser The ess TO-, ne
discovered in the .ry BY both parties 'hs; s u ~ en-
the m'ste and that =. .ho. 70
tie u.ehney accordingly delivered to me othsi ps
,srx,s brsusht On the orra.l for the sv.
ofthe " court CT equity even after ta and acs
er; p The court l.x viii perpetus Injunction %
,,y The further prosecution Ct such suit, snd Will Eake d
cree 10 compel The party return he wriSen eonnst sne
10 p.rfcrr %. efeay the implied p,rol agreement Suose
euentiy mad. By him % DO The verde, sn1 Jud
sveh es-h squ lbe defense not having eeeu allowed
1 H. court Of law vii be estoppel
fhoms, j Carter &c. at b Hsnmest, lie: .
| Where a person not the original lessee in the wrt
ter lease occa rirs sasshod premises urter verbal sSn
uert from the lore u the entire interest," ne respoasO
hat Of bis under tenant; bat H. nstesd OF urcerecht
sssn rns BY psol the entire Interest 70 saosne az
cher an not he i'm rediste sssgnor responoe tof ~
sabseqsent occupancy The liability. IN sIeh case 'e'-N
| ton possession and no. from express contract -, M
Crsy Receiver OF the M.tfsws1 Coupsny ssst ps'a Os
The defendant having. in bis answer. expressly pa
raittsd IN irisbteslss Of 81 so (esint eio nss