New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-12-04

ihe--f,r r.-.a-AAl>.-.->~A-~~--s
therefor rae p.svsOu.7 this re.psc. ssss
deprive eIeditor Of h Sy ns I've astoe
fore the nOts due aihossh esanOt be enforced al .<-
Hepry SofTe, respondent sgt Joseph p Gallagher
arc Jaoss Frsl sppeiiszu oOa az When upoa ssis
q ss' r Ss III ss1 ri sse . yysSs ~
sse sthossA The pp'e5ai ndos.t the sore .ass s,ss
ussssi ospsr SUSPECT the rsh and hsb. DOLLY to the
Fen.b is o. 'uoh 40 ndSrsst Ana ss vsndes essSos s
noss A. oreFs Surrender l. on tAe triI
,.T,s srhsr psrty to produce further tssi@Oayi
Iifs,d PeN appellant. ads. John Hsnnay. adnr. a
s.4 uel Hannsv Gee Intrshsm J. surety sssiast vhoo
usseni bad Teen recovered set up rsecsery q ssss
judgment defense action eroash' By bis Prae'ps
ussnsst nodifeS sioups amount reported aue 90 jsss-
inert Up By defendant In his answers 20 costs In tAs sss
Noah Morris, respondent sgt l.. Fargo, spPellsat
40 me .sos ss0 az
furnish The sindOw csr and the latter agrees to Do %
sry,sr. b15Ds erected that ihs cas. posa
theretf and i, uade aud Of vsisss
ri n he walls. tom sa2s n an scion s1SssS, .s.s.ss
him or tue soIt labor and Iaeras sa'ts6s dsdsuss -
seens he caps necessarily acceptance Of sAs
wo.t tail psTt9rmsnes Of toe .sreenrnt Tue msrss
esvest eDpe soe 70 sales OF GOODS does not spry 70
such case. JsdsHsst'e sNs
William II. VSaesfu respondent, sgt Dudley
wseSs arrssr. that he ~ Sir,s ~ - agent sSs
signed esse under sea ~ao hns be- psro sathorty.
l6, that ss ass Sss
norwthsts noins authority execute the ss
under zeal rot shown Jndsmtnt reduced to &S2l.
Robert T. Russell agt Elisha Ruckm,u-whers .
sheriff levs. under ssrsnt attachment urpn che pcvy
che pianH srd note which the plantf has 81 hs
time the Of prosecution such levy cannot be
h The defer dsnt In supplemental answer defense 70 the
Plaintiffs The scion he continued By the ShS
IN the the ps nd orthe Sheriff may BE- substeuex
plaintiff a. his election ts,ment 10 the shrf seems.
nay be coed tense Whether upplemensal answer an
be Z cd in = Jusiiee sSoaTt-gsery
Henry Beekman, respondent sgt. Herman Boz
sppe liant tpsrshsm, = J-Nhen tenant sess -
subtepen property articles which part %
purchaser damages or brrach cOrtgact tbs
sse account Of he failure Of the yendeTs s The sub
lease 20 the oisn landlord does dscha the liability u
Il vtndsr
Christopher Keyes, plaintiff respondent, sgaiast
Charles Dew in daht app isrt Wood NJ -On
snch moon the Court msy ryrw s tho had
the trial ard consider alleged rulings though
ton Ia the charge to the Jur which the Court perceive
have wrought njusice, The Court wonid order trial
Judgment he hearing thereon s like the former review
BY wiki 81 std the rulings the tIis aud
the charge 20 the JurJ, are only open 70 ex.nnsssa
thew excepted 20. general exception 70 the
whole charge ans 70 every part thereof where the charge
bsccs many propositions improper ard vii not "
entertained In scfion for sssAu and battery u
mediate danger Of assault from the plaintiff aud
that sefdeense required force repel such assault tast Ne
defendant nom yfndc've exemplary dsmsg-s
The eases of the Fire Department ACT. Wright ~
Noble Philadelphia Insurance
mics and sIoes Of State Insurance company having sses
New York per the premuws earned by
said sgercies beue6t Of the Fire Depamet
fund sfeeab, 20 The Law Ofls9 In opposition 70 the els'@,
agents the lsW i unconstitutional Tho Court hsH
dat il 8. rot uucor ,tutoss AMI confirmed the vseic.
favor Cf The the DEPARTING at