New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-30

~
costs e referee ssssS IA iinE rs the costs %
zach o. he c.s TIE case "a ssden, cernae as'
nsni eoG6rnls report eIsept As 70 he sss laf1nsS
Cob at wess
Suit for work and labor In defense Il was said de
Her Church and Marry white ssesv-tios soDs
considers tse 'seemsu under The eruranees be vala
the Sot R.po S OF 70 sr 81 ~, III % w.
OI6srd.
Beirne at Dorel
This case was brought 10 recover damages on 81
s,srdsn ard eu 70 Se~os.S. -S.r. ,sy s go.
tanned the bales being opened be Inseh
The good, sold to plaintiff By .mp. On IN. s,, .
in hi. ccuI held the f,- il Eassad that .as
By sample implied w.rsntee and verdict gwen for
bed hat mere sal. BY sample Except IA the .,,e. Of
cotton unless their WI, an sosss. sseenen vas nO war
that there bad been 90 peene GUARANTEE and moreover the
I'll present. The complaint was dismissed and this appeal
Jsdse Duer remarked that although IL .s,iast the view.
ID BY Ills Court and the law in England the decision
OF the Court Of Appeals Of cosfse mast rule Judgment s
samuel s. Purple AIT the Hudson River Railroad Co.
This suit was TO recover damages for injury caused
getting and causing her to be thrown wA great
signed plaintiff demurrer was pat 10 BY eeendant con
ssrdrs that being matter Of eoatrset sut Of tort the
tsten ,, the Judge at Special Term and sppe. nsds Thi'
cOg hinl. the Jodss At Special Tern W. correct tSs s
claim i..mPy s.sp. debit the party sssisn, but
code than vas before. Judgment on demurrer confirmed
The Mayor OF New York &c ss stuyvesan Ct sl-Cooper
aSt same.
defendants theirs of n w stuyvesantl from interfering with
the property the junction Third and Fourth ana ssv
In lss5. the Court said Nicholas w. stuyvessnt sold
Robert l. Reed and Ss,s: Henry Hall a. large saOH1. Of
cutting deed Reed and Hall conveying this piece Of
sd ssS. the rent. and p FOR y s.s and Ssn
revert back to said w or his heirs unless should BY
be SsnoSn.tsS Shortly s.s%.S
M Mr. a and SS the eo5vyd
BIN conveyed the City the oe opened and kept
IL remsned in hi. way till 1880 when the Corporation
eluded open square, and obtained an act rom the
iron the proeeedins. before the suprss Court si
defendant, appeared ard took edings under the statute
giving notice the Corporation that they must assert their
This b was 6led to obtain an injunction prevent defend
ants from further interfering with the land Mr. Cooper had
possessed Of piece Of land directly the the north
%. . s s d for wa:
The Court THINKS that the original deed O. and
were good before the Revised statutes and they
sSDS Ss Corporation would Be sucen
evident that the o,sns Intention Va, 70 dsdc.. the
The of the and in the partition sferwsrd BY
the heirs laid down {. public square. and the map
stpesr have been made By sp the Court considers
conclusive ratification Of the deed Of the ancestor nots
heirs eoSelUaed By these facts By the decision Of the
Supreme Court which against them from interfering with
the property. Order Of perpetual injunction granted
Beirne sEt LipPncott
n OK , SO COPIES each Of two woris to
30 wTitisn and furnlshei The defense mainly prn
& wSI S S:n. to Be- ahmed
Cottre agt Coukln.
Claim on alleged guarantee OF notes. The defense
10 defendant only indorser The Court conders
the remedy must be as SUCH hsny There also claim
sl4Othat admitted He may take Judgment on terms
for latter amend, &c.
By the owner of Pier No. a. North River, against
the Captain vessel for dsm.ses alleged to hVe been done
the pier by the improper manner OF png upon Il par
t e.psip. p ths per to Sre sd down
The defense that the iron had been properly and rssu
who entered it, and that was replied IN the place
alluded after had been weighed By the Custom House
weshe The referee found that there was no fault on tho
part Of the vessel A.. ......... a..
that the facts did not Justify report and that the
weheT the agent Of the master and the latter response
The Court consider the f.c justified the decision Of the
referee There had been T delivery OF tss "a,
'en'e "'P''' Before Judge sLossoS
SUIT As TO ALLEGED PROPERTY OF GEORGE W.
NILES.
J. TOwn.hend sgt. Edward Ives and David wssson
s2 in Sept iSis the large store used .Oase 80 iOs
son side at sale by the Sheriff on jgdgmsnt
s a5' tbs. ~s not redeemed allowed
.s ss. 5 property the.
I've. wesson bold said and premises and refuse 90
awe them ups and the present Is suit Of ejeetment by the
purchaser said SHERIFF. sale to be put IN possession OF the
property.
defense it is said that the property never belonged to
George W. Niles bat had belonged 10 samuel Swawout thA
the latter mogsged TO certain paes the mortgage was
closed and the premises purchased by Mr. ives
| who let them TO Mr. Wesson
Mr. Niles IL wu said the property under distress war
rant usd by the United States 1877 for lleged deica
Of Mr. Swartw0ut while Collector OF the for
paying $500 therefor The property 10 said Is worth
6C6 existing upon Il of $1,000 az when M Nues
sot i'll eoneDd.d by defense that this was void pro-
ceedns On motion the complaint wa. d.missed FOR P.o'
til Mr. Townshend In person For defendant Mr. Asa Child