Wheeling daily intelligencer. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1852-1859, 1854-10-19

luntT.'l ,dan, Haohel Qoning r. Kew
4 The PAIIe ollelpondeai 81 ihe NeR York TIL
snt tommupl1Dlo1 TIE nl'1 ti1f ilsWs OF news.
gAau, Thni ID, SEPT 90, 1851.
4 various olalcmeno laqln 1nr cred IN the ioul'
nails concerning lh6 ObIqolol lll Soule'1 visit %
Parlsllihg moment On ablo 20 say That I ives
not lemRndedb by any opeoaI object. Alg, 6oulU
was IerFealing few weeks with he family q
theig farm In the south al France, and leorning
that Mt. Dudley Mann WIS ID Pans, he selaed
lup0n that opportunity 10 un up to Inv city lot
fortnight 10 counsel with hn diplomatic brethren
on the various qusaIlon9 which arc now undei
negoliallon Ct the seHe5ai lions o. ihg mopsnt
4 Ienfesenled 10 Paris. rho only piece Of inlelh'
/ genue OF any importance Which I can give you as
The result Of Ne. B0uleo vgll, y tie report that
Spain, R,owing convinced Of; no Impending danger
l OF w6Fwilh the United States, and naleIhlly
desiring 10 avoid 80 dangelons d crisis, now nAni,
iesIs gppIet willingnes. % ssllle apieably aud
4 Reasonably tho Black WAluor difficulty, AlT
Soule will coon return 20 hi1 ihhily, bot believe
the time Of his return 10 Aladfid Is not fixed,
The end, the sin, the 6bleol OF alI. SiOkleSs
secret mission TO SPAIN hos dominated In Wild
boar hunt Va the PYgeueei mounlaipHl AileI .
vast amount Of preparation IL Paris, dttes haylag
| Satded the public mind Of tie IMPOTENCE 81 bio
nit,l0n, nndhu'g prepared y iOs loBhoomlug ereuls
andunel having engaged Inc iuvulnoble 1sIylcsl
OF GeoTgs Digs, tie buck diplomat tue patty
len Pens in perfect blaze Of amllgamaled glory.
Arrived ia the Ariege Of temporary IeSldenoS OF
MI. Soule, and ADeEhavlng Joined thus genlleanm
In temporary hunt IN llls mountains, he returned
10 Paris With Ne Soule, aud having SET In one OF
two diplomatic councils At tue Legation IN This
oily, passed on 10 London. Various eoniecluTea
axe In calculation os 10 The cause OF The abrupt
Termination Of this impOllnnl mission into Spuinl
whether II was that the "Secfel Service Fund"
gave out, OF that Tie chief Of the mission lost cos
I q L. - a.mn a al
sio itself was only ChineIiCal, Is not known. ~
| is thought by some, since Dggs hos not yst made
his apneaEaics In Paris, that the chief, fearing TO
trust himself too laf away from The tlapqniliGink
influence VI The cashier OF The "BuFOpeun PE,si'
dental League, has given full nuweE to his
COOged BXCsllency TO execute The mission alonsi
so that the Government may mol, alter all, Oe dee
piived Of The important object which II sought.
Il has been OIlel stated, aud % often denied, lhpl
Madame Raohelinlendoto nuke professional tour
in the United States aileE the close VI her present
and Anal engagement al tho Theatre FfancaiS. ]
am now authorized 10 state BY Madame Rachel
herself that her agent will sail IN few days 70
New York to make arrangements lof her appear
unce lhiS winter h tile gleat ohaIacleIs who'll have
placed her at the head Of living Waslc actresses.
AS SHE plays entirely Ia French, she Intends u
take a complete company itOm PsIis win h'b
and owing 10 The enormous expense attending such
m enterprise, and tie comparatively lew terIesen-
luklOud WHICH sue VIII uo NVlu 70 klNg w elH wv
on account Of the tongue, several lntUenllal PETS
sons hIve endeavOTed 10 discourage her from The
attempt, hut her mind seems hxsl, aud she cou-
linUes her preparations for The journey.
-------.-ss---.--------- 55
LABulTY or RAuLwAT UonrAMEs 40 CAR-
aiEas. w Q publish Tie case reported below fOr
The benefit u merchants and Others forwarding
goods frcm lie Enst The law as Rendered in this
case is doubtless correct, but the practice Of met
chants Is founded on different constructions Of
the liability Of Ourtlers. The exact extent Of tie:
sponsibihty Of carriers ought 10 be known and the
Practice made to conform TO IL;
In the Marine Court Of New York, Sept. %.
befvIe Judge Phillipsb was tired the case Of An.
ton Fine VS.. The New York nnd Bite Railroad
Company This action Is brought TO recover the
valnU Of box or trunk containing Jugueneoyps
apparatus and clothing, delivered 10 delvanls 10
be transported, as Is alleged 10 Cincinnati. The
lIunk was taken TO tile ConpanYS depot Of the foot
lDfDuDhe street. aud the following ticket gwen 10
The person who leiIit, being copYo Of tie adde's
on the box;
Anton Arns c nennau Ohio, care Of Mr.. Riasi ne
Sycamore street, one chest luggage ,,,
Mey 6stS54. BROWN.
The defendants produced their tally cetk at
Dunkirk, who proved That on the 18Th Of Muy last
a box having the above mark was received by him
from the cars at DuEkiFk, aud by him shipped the
same day by Tie boat for Cleveland, Ohio, That be-
| ing tho usual route 10 Cincinnati. The plaintiff
claims that the defendants, as COMMON cAUlets
undertook TO deliver the box nqueslion Of Cipcin-
natl, as per direction, and tha they are liable l0l
their lailUIein dOinR so.
| Judge Phillins-rhe dLfandants are an incoI.
pOt0led company Tor the transportation OF freight
and passengers lion New York TO DunkiEk aud
| TO tile extent of their line they uEe 10 DO deemed
/ caFr.ro Ia nF,lpF In mnka them linbiP
beyond the terminus OF their line hs common cat.
reFs, on eTprss agreement to onily must DO
shown. This tile plaintiff contends is 10 hs inlef'
red from the receipt given by the cOlnpanYs ngent
at New York. When box oil goods Is delivered
| to O common carrier, marked IN d particular inaIl-
ner, without any directions except such as may be
| inferred from the maEks Themselves, The carrier
has right TO presume that HE Conslgnee Of The
goods ends tie Garner shall tanspOTlAnd dispose
Of them in the usual way; aud II the OwneEol Tie
goods nesleots TO make the necessary agreement as
the uange OF custom OF the business OF 10 gvedi'
EectiOns as to tic disposal Of tho goods, II Is hug
own fault, Ond Tue loss, II any, aItsT the cafIitt
| Ins perforated HE duty according TO The ordinary
course Of his trade and business, should lall upon
such owner aud not upon The common carrier.
| (Van SaIlVOoTd VS.. st. John, Hill, lbS.) TIE
evidence In this case shows that the box, mi
the due cOuIse, wng received at DuhkEki
was checked upon The way bill by The tally leTki
aud in pursuance OF their usual custom placed IN
the boat for Cleveland en- route for Cincinnati.
So laT as common carriers, The delesdhnis seem 10
have performed their dnty. Is there, then, any
| sRreelnent ny which the defendants con.
Itactedlo transport tile goods beyond the line Of
their route. There certainly is nothing inlhe
language ofthe receipt TO make the company spe
i cially liable, further than they would have beenif
no such receipt had been gveni and the delivery
9th box by the tally clerk gu board The steamer
ut Cleveland, marked in that manner, Is cleuTy
proved. II lie simple acknowledgment by the
clerk OF nRent at The depot that he hOd received
box o! luggage with particular mark thereon,
which, so fsT as giving The receipt WIS concerned,
was mere mark OF Identity (vun SaItVooTd vs..
81. John, 6 Till, 1919 Tie rule Of Low winch
now seems 10 be established 10, that common cot.
Iies ATE moi liable for the safety Of goods beyond
the route on which they are caTuersl aud there
fore can only treat the defendants as iOtwutdeTs
beyond DunkiIk (Aokley vs. Kelley, 8 CUwen,
226) Judgments Tor defnndan's will costs.