New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-11-23
Molten for rev trial denied. Inc defendAi
said has appealed 10 General Term
SUPREME CoURT-GESERAL Term.

DECISION.
BeGre the Hon judges MITCHELL (P -, ROOSEVELT and
CLERks.
We have already published abstracts OF the last de-
cisions Of this Court but the following OF suii-
Gent importance to give in detail;
INTERESTING oPiSIoN oS SUIT FOR AMOUNT OF
LIFE INSURANCE Foley.
Buekbee 6gt United States ln'ursree ANNUITY ana lTst
Company
CrrRKE. John c. Backbee the husband Of the
Insured life with The fsrdsIis 10 the sun OF one
ou.sno dollars benefit b. wife The Prsiam Of
tn dslsrs quarterly be paid in advance the i pay
cat on the 10Th March 1851 when the policy executed
provided that in case ts Psmuns should no Dc PAd
such esse may be renewed q spy tii'e % nc "
tfeo-y evidence 10 the health u the Insured and pay
Nv medical examiner Of the ComPany, "a me excuse
m tlc Insured tcuE Ia ell indispersaoie when
thsi, esy. ,hAii s eB tBs asv o. h thy fei
due. PROBABLY not in tay instanee-,i al events not
ps,sbe Cd the 10Th MATch 49, nos pAid nat he tla
Ami the second payable the ioh Jnoe w. not pad az
M the I7th Juy a5d Il stated in the wheo tae hid
va, paid The fourth and last able 90 ths ioth Dec ".
r.o On tie l6h suotbee cree on ne lsh Jan 1917 ht'ns
- Es,ed Tor nine with tub rcuou disease q the
,ouseh sra liver Which terminated IN his deah 5e vas
therefore far sevsoesd - ne a,sss .s h ~. - pr
10 ,ed In consequence OF the non payment OF TOE pre- al
,hs IStb 81 december when payable. The pssFt
90 rs.r Sc 6,s- Of the conditions tecoapzay Aad
form ma part Of the policy q dseiIts ~ SO u n
~ -. nei Cd bat is voa l. vii be borus Il Ind
that lie inuTsnces amer he ont.n a. up = -
and the contract eonsumnset th- in.at1 nss ,ts
q The policy ~hatevsI may haPpen 70 zoe n.Ata 81 "a
HE insured prOEasd ne insured to,-
i.s with n. conditions Of the contract 30 tnN tne
fr,iur In this csc hsd been psid on TIE Vta Of
he r.utH under obhgaiioH 10 say anytans 49, -
Husband. health Tor Whtther re Wss scs OF WEI 'ls ~
S 10 irrre AZ the rate steheo N the Poiey lie sees
p Therefore Is whether OMISSION 20 pay me PfealA
for sx dsys after il became eue required AaJ amer cor
81 conduct Der part very great - 5ille ~ - -. 80
OF tstueut j: VII Be seen Wa perIoitea " &c -
Win rrs.rd 70 The fc.mer p ens except one Au1 " es
that paid CT TIE cay 80 . -1
ard tutk believe very cuulDon, PeraHs nc --os-
rrsrtie- N iuurAnte companies The prmi1na q
I,rt.d upou the precise 6sy which u fall dle. ne pa
n - aryl.
80 rstrrsy ncueed the Vlsins suppose nat sIa
= rrsrcs ss 70 tie hour Gbd CAV Of psSm-h ~oue %
h. rsopir.d on this tbs former OCCASIONS LAZY A
IT. ran, rcou5isdy any time. 70 fefsra rs So
s.l,x deviation from the terms OF tns Sou-1e'f
- before they received payment OF PIE prsa---
- .ontrs evi4ence The health Of The nsared oat 10y
). veu dcutied vhether IL this case they eoaa
- sht without uctioe the pAnt- that hey l. osa 40
ir une,, evidence should &c produced 70 frS-7 e
50 r-euiur bo~ever accepted without OBJ
"a NJ o TIE evidence Of rhonpscn. not Sord
-, ~, ara the CeTk Uho received u solai
t,L II ,v.uts II received the Ion Deesa ~.
$3.50 r. ered, Of the pocy nd reesPf siF7n ~ -
- f.ei,. he pGrties nv opinion precisely 10 VS.
:. M, IS ps,4 OF the lorh when u sirliit-a 80.
,t,,svsr US the eondirion Of bueko-es heath u
sr.S IN ri force Urdsr the circumstances t-sA -
c ~ e-.Eered IS the esseIce 81 sneh eonuac.i =,
- ,sris no, 20 negotiable fnt-rprstsiinn ~
- raj hefve- rsisht been the previous pr.s -
- N vrxs.inr fs- Of the pre- niu rs -
--eS az. hiurelfo Of the irt1lEenee co7s.all
Irrsh N . = rch s1t th- BE tA 81 ne .
wT IA, IN TIE meantime the insurer. a.
,s,,ns.ss a he r,cszes ~tek tast< eva eSeaA-