Weekly national intelligencer. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1841-1869, 1854-11-04

scale shrssxA enc q ss saa. Va ssers,sssss sI
40 tbs osessiens
Pa Al "a msmsns -.s sb..s "a ..,a va. IA. ,.,,..
&ss 80 ne hssss y rsssss ths visit 81 Msssr p aud
sight hzss is.rusl on thsss rsnslsms. sh.f ~aa 80
sh - Fnss q .hiss lad dc sghsst idea, but a
ss = s az saEs shish reading my
sstsass ~ Pea iar that papess have eonvnesd
ns' astkssx has bsss hssxa from your intention
ssas = sAs Dssre Rss1a 10 sspsessns ,IIs
~ s1sy ssa - stAks 10 pea the satisfaction which
,s = ssalsx removed the motives wAish might have
&1 sssss.s~his terra ~ csnueversy. You win CON-
ksssssa - As stnssn shicA alstaisd sny letter aad
80 4, sg1esss-ss nsAs lastisa
ne parie kEAasi shsssa pakiIsh ysar ls,s.y psy ~ 80,
Aa.s m.. ss ssf1es V Az has wlsh As asssn, II Hose
s, 1870 sss sssa assA "a. 4 shall Be yea wlo az
sheald rsan - NE s&sxssy II psivsss ~
whsshsr sAs shasasss a apahs aslasat I 3 = mrsr,sd
IAsss sAs Asaer pisss myself a yssr o,a,r, and A.,
yoar vbsdisnt servant. ss''' sou 'h
Well the Representatives Mr. ssul. 49,. ,-...,...,
10 us the resolution u that geasisman NJ so.ls -.
ss. "a hs paoneAuon e. his istisr Tbs rascns which
ne assigns for this decision do not convince ma IA 49,
eges right which have NOT denied him; bur ~ saie
no notice OF the eogent reasons for pursuing dsrers
course which We have Indicated above and which COM
sssd little prudence In this matter He astonshsd
that We should not already have published his letter
without seeing that his departure ought necessarily IA
have delayed the realization Of his desire Conforming
however, strictly 10 the aniscedents Of this affair We
publish to-day the aforementioned letter because II vss
50 agreed upon but have thought ID right 70 give al
the same time minute account Of the at
tending H. since nothing Is essentatin delicate mat
tsrs Of this sort as eearnsss as esperia when they
There is incidchr connected With this matter hill.
We ought not TO pass over In silence insuch as II com
pietes the history Of s different phases The Messger
OF Bayonne published In Its number or the 9th Of this
month copy Of Mr.. Soues letter sent to Ii BY its
Madrid correspondent Although IL Is evident that from
the moment Mr. Soulss letter appeared at Bayonne Il
was open 70 us to give TO the public here relation Of the
facts and the documents which passed between us we
have absaned from doing In order TO carry out 10 the
letter the formay which required us TO await the an
swer Of Mr. Soue We have the assurance that the re-
spectacle persons who interviewed In the matter have had
no part In that publication. But let the cause be what
II may In virtue Of which the publication took place nj
Bayonnc, II Is unquestionabe that II Is our right and
even our duty to claim equal publicity for oil the de-
tails Of the and with this object tho editor
Of the Daro Espanol copy Of his reply to the ed
tor OF the Mesager accompanied by the following letter
addressed to the same journal
MADRID, SEPTEMBER II, 1854
10 the Editor Of the Messenger Of Bayonne.
Dear Sir and Esteemed Colleague have lust read in the
number OF your estmabe journal Of the 9th Of this month
the letter which the Hon Pierre soule Of the
ultimo
However the publication Of the said letter. 10
you by your correspondent may seem independent OF the
will Of this gentleman, could but feel surprised at its
appearance inasmuch its publication was postponed in
Madrid by agreement with the representative Of Mr. Soule
until the latter gentleman, after the receipt Of my repy
should come TO decision the matter M his
which took place two hours after his letter reached me- made
any immediate on the subject impossible What
your correspondent says therefore, respecting the why
the letter OF Mr. Soue did not appear in the Dario Epano
is not correct.
the public in your periodical while have not received
either directly indirectly the reply Of Mr. Soule have
right 70 request you to insert in the columns Of the Mesag
with the present letter. that which, the 3s Of August
copy Of which adoined addressed to the repre-
sentative of the United States In reply his own.
In this reply you will indicated the facts which have
given rise to my controversy with the Hon. Mr. souc and
their perusal will enable you comprehend the unanimous
made during the last few days by the press Of
Madrid not against the representative of still friendly Pow
or and towards whom for that reason, observe the
spect due to his position; still less against him in his
private capacity SINCE thank God, civilization permits
respectable in our ayersares and even
in enemcs but against tho influence whichwh or With
out reason as this has nothing to do with the matter and
tion-aganst innSanse which rabs opinion attributes to
that parsonage in last internal dturbances and which
the arrangement of differences with tho faissd stats
beg that will have the goodness vail yourelf Of
extensive relations in order that which
may contribute to clear up question destined psSsn. \,
have very serious results be repubshcd by the onas
Of your country in the hope that they will extend the pr~i
ege of publicity to that which Mr. Soue addressed 10 me
and to which you have given insertion In your journal
feel that ask this favor from the courtesy spirit Of
mpartiaity which have always distinguished your Journal
have the honor to remain, &C.
MANUEL R.scEs vmLasuEvA,
Editor Of the Diario Espanof.
We cannot and ought not to conclude without making
one very important observation, which justices the mi
nuteness with which we have detailed the incidents Of
our controversy with the representative Of the United
States In the actual state Of relations with that
country when there are grave questions to be resolved
between the two Governments, the most insignificant
circumstance, events the most Indifferent in other stua-
tons may have il enormously interpreted transcend
ant Importance.
The correspondence that has passed between Mr.
Soue and the Diario Espano and the animated dscus-
sion to which the greater part Of the Madrid press has
recently devoted ITSELF would be in that case Of the high
est Importance II the origin Of the present controversy
were not clearly determined In this question the Espa-
mol, equally with the Novedades the Sigo, as we'll AZ
the Epocajournals which, in conjunction with u.s. have
lately devoted much attention TO the Cuban question
in all its phaseshave been impsled to that by
public opinion, profoundly alarmed and theoretically
pronounced upon determinate events Let the facts Of
the case therefore, be clearly ascerned whatever may
be the result lest what may be merely personal
patiby should arrive at more important proportions
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL.
We are glad to find from the subjoincd paragraph that