The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-03-20

THE STREETS.
Of tlsiaw Itnow sves,rymsn Of Trinity Church but
cid not es Of any s1Sr 81 tss part or col
tie ssSrsa y s s la who% they
esrdsd the passage this dry the vosry Of
ills church had the daring to make these foul
brand upon bis venerable brow.
1t contains evidence that from them
sets forth Which were their sole possession
% R e as .y Sass been AND
heard nothing from ut PSSrp.n III, ;glsss
those who the power and shield q the
corporation Of Trinity Church. to calumnats and to crush
Who these yestrymen, and who, again ask ia Mr.
their bidding by reform Common counes II Is said Mr.
Norman Is not member of their church believe that
Mr. Norman is Presbyterian and although not of
He nonconfoImist to church domination in matters Of
whether i be exercised r9deE the Episcopal
is not the man who may be Justly assaed with npunity
asd 'Ss By & @
o. sspn n or moyes nor ~ the
whole church militant.
Church that he seeking what they aiIege
his overown wealth BY seregi0qsy disturbing the ashes
charities 70 his liberal endowmsnts Of institutions Aid
cured Institution Blind the land On which
to-day than ali Inc lands Norman Within the limits
Affected lie united with neighbors
to their properly and Els xnS 50 far Il
sss
81 sss witty to Ss ss moas Of lie
The ehaT5e that h. wanting pr respect for tho
means Of ten thousand dOars provide suitable
for 11s to E for Of %
inn ss in yn sai gSs
sr hs
of tl,s
exempt the claims public for their ue any
private in ju.s e thas which i
'ss s sns
The Common Council BY the vestry Trinity Church
tsey will for repeal tbs law The necessity Of
HE aestry Trinity Church. in their newspaper srti
.sr rsv as
large FELLOW citizens who have desired mod
o s
IT as % ali
the present vestrymen of Trinity Church From their
abroad Their predecessors know suddenly went q
sh
here r Emmett should have ventured to repeat yor
their impntston that the birth of Mr. Boorman happened
Mr. Boerman is English by lrth SO is the corporation
Mr. &
than nns e Of the nns Of a city lie Is
United States for almost half century And yet who
stanasse orsisnsr ana my
and most respected friend r Emmett by the instruction
Gentlemen Mr. James Norman was resident in this
When Justly eminent honsTes asSsr learned
friend first Get hs foot S on This soil Of hyng from
t.na4y esfassd tie e Trinity charsI and
is s%p ss liz am not my
S%s
to leyae while he has adorned that honorable cha
aerea BY others may Safely challenge doiamsrs
WITH other an than those e. which have
sSs Ss,sI,.s SSos s sssSs sgs
vetgy and the balance VIII not be found against him
@ the @
ordinary Who would
late the graves profane the ashes dead
ms IL our nsHas ny
WITH
submit that unbushing efrontery
y and 's the
a s shs
compose si, yestry to be inst l9noralis and liberal e
yduay one OF item would dare to east t such
tie resnse human Of their acts IN thai
they should pointedly condemned.
charge my duty to clients and hope to have conyince
the committee
First that the law asked to repeal originated in tn
wants Of the public felt often
will sulscrve private interests and greatly improve i'm
portant section Of the city, while 1t facilitates trade
commerce. and that reasons Of public policy, any
| Just entinents, call for its repeal.
Secondly that II IL he regarded question between the
very Of Trinity Church and Mr. James Boorman merits
on TIE part that body nor any dement's on the part OF
Mr. Doorman demand the interference of the Legislature
| TO change the existing law.
therefore hope that You will report adversely
to the petitions the repeal of the The win
determine the sovereignty of Trinity Church, the
| reignty of the people.