New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-12-05

,.,.a ~ so,ouop Simpson, when 10 Cincinnati,
Ssd not ssked him 10 induce defendant TO go 70
house OF illfame, and hs beng seen IN one "oae %
sue;cent in New-York 10 get divorce-aso say that
xopy brother and yoursef looked 80 much alike that
l. coud get any Of those lewd wOmen 10 swear tha'
Solomon had been in their house. The questions were
objected 10 and ruled out endeavOred TO reconeie
the plaintiff snd defendant after hearing OF ,no
yOrce, and took 30 strong part IN behalf Oh Pi"'
that / gave offense 10 my brother. 49,. -,
The witness was asked by Mr.. Graham anu
swered several questions as to the msnh h !" ,w;,h
witness and his brother wore Their "ns h IL, g.,
Viz. to tbs idea M their resembling each otnet' l9'
onion Childs the brother, was ., .,,e lur T.; 1bev
hind bis counsel be having recently come IN lucy
have strong family resemoishce ~ ha;n iargoIv
;rSebted IN Sew-York and could not come 10, after
hi, failure for fear OF arrest -. r,.
wi,n,ss was asked by Mr. Jordan If he did not near
n, Solomon l.. Simpson say that plaintiff and de-
fndsrt must and should be divorced, If s the house
NJ 4. H. Simpson & Sons had to swear In the ousl'
Mr.. Graham objected to the question, and said that
after Mr.. Solomon l.. Simpson saw defendant 10 me
house Of Bell Forrest, il was determined TO get
divorce and there could be no compromise then Mr..
Jordan replied that whether Mr. Simpson 30 saw de-
PENDANT would be question for the Jury.
Three etters, written by witness to Mr. simpson,
in 1881. were put in evdence-one Of them spoke OF
defendant having gone 10 neutrality-suspicious. ms
having gone TO Europe The other spoke OF the prop
position for divorce but expressed hope thst the
difficulty would be recoDcleO'
The witness had not concluded his testimony "heh
the Court adjourned.
SUPERIOR COURT-DEc. 4-Before Judge sLossoS.
DEEb OF PoPERTY TO WIFE.
Csustn Sherman ast. John Hker and Margaret nn whe.
Action Of eecment to obtain possession oftwo acres
and of land Wards Island Defendant M
he leased the property with the privilege 70 purchase wno
certain time Money loaned by Mr. Stevens COUNSELLOR
stl.w 20 bis wife who purchased the premises tsshs oeea
under the law Of 1898 following married woman 70 hod prop
,uy and giving Mr. Stevens mortgage on the properly oi
his 1ecurV Mr. Sherman creditor OF MI Hillker, ana
ATTAINED Judgment and receiver claims night 70 the proper
ty that H. could purchase and hold prop
ey by borrowing In this case the husband
In debt and brings the present suit conen1ng
that the belonged the husband under the purchase
and the claims against him the land having rise
ia value This denied By direction OF the Court verdict
wss rendered 10 favor defendant with liberty 70 plaintiff to
make case 10 be heard General Term For plaintiff,
Mes Sanford and Billings for defendants Messrs Stevens
stougbton and Harrington.
GENERAL TEkM.-DEcisIoNs.
Michael Brady sg Garry Dryer-Hugh Mcktteck sgt same.
To recover on purchase Of COWS. An answer that
the agreement purchasing was 10 psy part down. vine
wss done pay plaintiff when he able do So not
frivolous the present ability to pay mus. be
passed by Jury. Motion 10 strike out answer ana o'
Judgment, denied without costs ,.
Solomon Townsend agt- Philip L. Scare.
Order modified, no costs on appeal 10 elther party