Plymouth banner. (Plymouth, Marshall County, Ind.) 1852-1855, 1854-09-14
FEOPLE'S TICKET.
SCHU iLER C0LFAA


Nix. En4TOR:- Is your paper Is the on
" organ in cur County FOR commgnita-
rlom. AMI as some papeiS fdyorin9 Tie Il
peal Of the Missouri Compronisc and thr
late measure Of he NehIa.aa :, Kansas
Bn.; hope yoa viii favor Us orpose,i t.
these views. with an occasions. pub.i
ration. The fdvOriies Of the Repeel are
tceming with loud acclamatious on their
opponents; styling them Disun:oni>ts.
Factionis;s. \ bO.itiOniSlS e. all &c. (D
As TO Disunionis;s. il IS vel. known aud
be ii remcm bered that the compromise
was made ana entered into for quieting
factions. and settling sectional Gifltreu-
res, and The late parry who called, for The
Repea. of ,hat COMPROMISE are the f5c-
zionist party for ha.ing lniJ their S4cra-
legious hands OF compromise. that had
for 81 years remained unmolesied-A 81
they are the Abolition Party on this no.
mentious controversy; they having com
plttely abolished tina; compromise, here
tofore holding sacred to freedom the Ter
ritories of Kansas * Nebraska. ~ anu
by the late Repeal i, becomes Liable to
Slavery jurisdiction. We have often
heard Of desire 10 abolish Slavery 10
Freedom but this doctrine q aso!isl,ins
free Territory and suhjcc.iug il 70 De
come slavery, IS rather u new feafur. Ia
the American Republic. have hsari Il
remarked By some that ;Ais late Bal
gave popular self governm NJ 10 she reo-
pie fully: las much as TO ssy sell GOV
crnmen. cannot be oomg!e;7 vi.'..., l.
Jhanca f.. s'avtiy.)
Au. furthermore. tley claim vonlrss
in favor Of said BIZ f0r having L.riG
cone away will c0nsres.i0Hl. latcTrcn.
ton in the territories. (.nl tra.y To-
have done wonderfully as !. Is the IL
io!ative authority of the territory - L.
vested, nor is legislature elected By the
people. but ii the .oyrrnment and leg
IsIatuGe. this Bill invests 'l.e governor
with legislative power equal II that OF
one third OF the msmb rs in eacl. branch
al tie Legislature his veto Or t.isapproyc
mert will arrest any act which eanno,
commend The sanction Of TIVE thirds %
each branch. aid IL this direct power
If Tie veto the influence which the pat
,onage and station o. ihe governor con
fers and i. is easily seen that few acts rb-
objectionable 10 him are likely 10 receive
legislative sanction.
Then also every act OF the legislature
has TO pass tie ordeal Of The juliciary.
srli must depend for its execution inp part
"a, court not Only upon the Gs.ernor, bu.
upon the Secretary the District AttogGey
and Marshall Now in this bill the al
vocaies II which profess 50 much respect
for the doctrine Of ellsoyernmeut one
would naturally expect their officers made
elections by the people, but instead
thereof the President. appoints the Gov
efnol also the Judges who determine the
constitutionallity Cr unconstitutional
OF all legislative acts. the President APP
points all the officers who must nccessa-
,ily exercise 50 important al influence
over the territorial districts. and 1t is %
be feared al his appointments will
favor Slavery propagation.
Those iavoring the repeal say it was
but an act OF congress, consequently. Il
able 10 repeal. tie ~. stands thus In
1920 after two or three ears Of sectional
difficulties the South proposed the com
promise and tie free States acquiesed.
the Sontl holds Missouri as their guar
anteed, aud that compromise from the
voters of it was to be perpetual.
1. What. saw the authorizes of Par
ley & Vstei. on the fullilment of cove
nants. compromises. agreements &c, they
say all such matters must be adjudged
and determined agreeable to the sense
aud meaning of the parties, when entered
into. hence the repealers have illegally
oyefthrown set at naugbt, compromise
entered into under good faith made a,
the insiigation of the Siaveholding States
Ell dconsented to by the Office for settling
sectional difficulties. to be and remain
perpetual. it is downright nonsense tn
pretend TO any other construction OF the
said compromise.
5. The opposite minority with sound
reasoning. manfully contended against
the repeal Compare the proclaimed log
ic use.l by them in Arguments against.
with TIE sophis,'caI reasoning of the
favofites Of the measure can the repeal
ers appear only as partial satellites s:rus'