New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-11-29
SUPERIOR coURT-Befcr. Juds. HorrnAS.
DIVORCE CASE.


This case was Continued. Further testimony was
sdduced in relston TO the health Of defendant Mr..
G.. bad formerly kept the st. Charles Hotel, and
more recently when be left his house in June, 1859
he end Mrs. G.. kept a boardisg. house AZ No ia
Leonardst. A number CT questions also were asked
as to defendant and his acquaintance with LADY
named Robinson who was said 80 have kept drink.
ing saloon opposite Pinteaus in Broadway, but
nothing material shown TO prove such acquaintance.
Defendant had taken the witness there, previously
telling him be would take him where he could get a
first rate cigar.
The plaintiff having rested, Mr. Brady opened for
defense. He contended tina: tho proof was wholly
insufficient regarded tho state OF health Of plain
tT or defendant to show improperly. He slso con.
tended that there was testimony proving an &C.
ouaintance, by plaintiff with any other woman and
also he said, It would be shown even if Mrs. g. had
had cause for blame as to Dir. g., that she had for
given T. as they resided as and wife up 10 the
period Of Mr. G. leaving bis home (which he did out
Of Unsatisfactory and the suit for divorce therefore
cannot lie maintained.
young woman, named Catharine Riley who
lived as domestic in the house, then gave testimony
.ss to Mr. and Mrs. G. living together she stated that
I'D 10 near the time Mr. g. left the houSe she had
them in their room and in bed.
The counsel cross-questOned 10 whether they
were undressed or not 7 She did not she said turn
the clothes to see saw them come from their room
together once when robbers had got into the house.
i To be continued.
SUIT FOR DEATH ny LOCOMOTIVE.
Msrsaret Conway sgt The Harlem Railroad Company.
BY plain tiiT under the statute, as administrators Of
ker son Ihouts Conway, decesscd. who dremsl be-
longing the Company. While Of the engines In the
under hesd OF steam he got undcrle
for he purpose get drink The engine a. the none az
stated 10 go An5 lie eG5eayored jump outside betSeen the
drvDs wheel ard the trsetwhee but be was s:rucx hs
back broken. ard be we. instantly kied
The def ndans moved thst the complaint be dsn.sd
ground that the principals no liable Tor the esfs
negligence OF the agents OF the Company Tsgsdd
thoSe sin liar mpoyment; aud that th deceased hirs
guilty Of negligence ia placing him.. n danger The
motion dmhs granted FOR pi NTH. MessTs Bueed
and Wilson ur defendants Gen sanford ard Mr. Biinge
Before judge CAMPBELL.
RoACHEs IL DWELLINGS, &C.-UNsUCcEssTCL SUIT
FOR RENT
Gsoree D. siekes sat John o. Robinson.
Action 10 recover quarter rent OF property No.
12I Barrow Il The defense 6au3uIent Representation
the condition Of the house having been represented by o4n
srs Robinson in every respect good dwelling az
In found by moving in 20 D.
greatly infested By roEeAes much to get lsae
evenings they sat In the and also that the
cellar damp and Unhealthy. MI Robinson moved ont
occupying months ard refused rent and
oi 10 bTor ght the ssse hch for On the part
iustrument prevail while for defense T. eoutended
that there being fraud in the representation a. TO the hpns
the void particularly Mr. sckels bad pcoFonsy
lived II the house bnseh and knew what The Court
left question 10 the Jury whether there had been
ep-esentsoDs fthcre hsd been plaintiff coad
cover The jay after few minutes absence returned
dict for defendant For plaintiff Mr. Wm NJ Allen; oE de-
f.rdau, Neprs Hdrrcnis, and Frye Robinson.
SPECIAL 1EsN-Befo-e Judge DukR-
DECISIONS.
Adolphus Oechs sgt. j. and j. W. Cook-New trial
.r,nt,d on payment OF coats NJ. Hsekan and wife
FawEd OConroI-ComplEnt dismissed. Edward Bradford
sft J. MeGewAn-New triAl denied, with costs