New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-11-13

reason Of yariou. srcryuou. Communications, a.
srbutcd 20 the plain tif paPhsssd in different Jour
mails. They show . contest "; no little bitterness
going on between ps.ties engaged in the work Of
Publishing the Holy Scriptures according TO fcrnr
or different version. II is sufficient 10 cay mat
there could % no Involvement, in court Of justice,
10 ipfamc controversy connected with 50 sacred Q
subject. The sfhdsvits raise other poiat Of de-
fence.
The Judge said ne adhered to the opinion be hsd
expr. seed, but the Chancellor Of the sac has
q, cioed the Law 10 be otherwise be would DO, set sp
his Judge HI private opinion agaiDs; the Sc. sion
But he was authorised 20 have the question detsg-
mined at the General Term, shere the decision Of
the Chancellor could be treaed with Difference, but
not reg e. ded a. the law
Ihe Injunction was ordered by Judge II. 10 be dis
sol,ej, unless plaintiff gave security to carry the
case 70 tho General Term, which Is Done, and mo
matter came before the full BEECH On Ssidrdsy Nj.
L. ID Culver appearing for plaintiffs, and Mr. Wn-
Niles f"- tftndapts. -
he Is attached He has taken no part
rnyetsy but has contributed toward the
Of each. lie regretted, be said, 70 see tne
Of feeling which the controversy appears 10 nave
elected He CONT nded however, ihai the letter was
sprivate communication 70 third party sad no pes-
son has sh 10 pos himself OF II and puo,ish IL.
Mr.. c. cited various authorities.
Mr.. Niles for defendant, con,eniej thst IL was not
apvate e.ter, anc, AZ any rate not processing any
peeubisry valne as literary compos,ton OF other
right TO injunction to prevent the publication. tie
contended that the revision OF the Boe was proper,
and offered remarks at considerable length.
The Judges asked explanation as to certain points
OF the decisions, &c. Decisions reserved.
DECISIONS.
ALLEGED FRAUDULENT STOCK IssvES.
Harlem Bsisoad Company AT Alex snder Kyle, il.
Appeal from an order denying motion 10 aeate or
ro.d Co sued clam for l.se soAsty Of stock alleged
n IN tha
Of dl Sates in opposition 10 the motion to
tror III issues prob, bity tha, the co
IsDy will have 10 assume she whole Of u -,
denied that defendant fantGlenty lsasd sad soea,
and says be ost the By gambling 10 soet, 10 Wall
sOne,hps Of the hind III DOS not deny ma "a, M
stock any that bring suh asAisst him, and NOT TIE
Frdm he fact the Judge sid ALLEGED that viii DO In
possible disin suish he snduen from the genuine stok
The probability sst The Company gill have % assume ne
whole of ia In which they will he Obliged piooahy 20
retire ,tOk to bring them within h- limit Of
Their charter but 9, th point =, Ssor and On H. nod
shape will probably come before Us ,oon me O2a wa
siept re ia ,Se pre.-u, Prceescps .sss We sSias
css /. safee5y n,de ont % hod the d'icassa, .nd
order accordingly denied
PLEADNGs IN SUITS by NEXT or KIN.
Charles Stafford sgt Dr.~ & Newton
Suit under the act, against the owners " steam
boat recover dsDsses the loss Of the q psnia al
sed have been all Cd BY the negligence Of the agents or
sompiains i Sefsetvs as Il do. not aver that psu
I'm Of deeead that be aust ned any ;aoi. d,msas
be- set forth IN The complaint Order appealed from saainins
the demurrer affirmed costs to abide event. PIsatHto hsvs
liberty to amend
RESTITUTION FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES on APPEALS.
Cornelius Karouse plaintiff Ia as John NJ Martin ds-
feD5snt In error
IL is discretionary with the Court whether, on APP
pes they will order restitution for expenses &C. or leave
perry bis remedy By suit Motion 10 compel restitution de-
MED but without costa -
In the appeal the Court Of Appeals Mr. ksncase va
himself TO blame % he should, that Court decided havs
the U Circuit cOu Nj Mar,ns .espos'ibe and
sdent. while Sir KAi ouso 10 nehes and Mr. Martin says
Mr.. Kauouss him lsTse OF money II 10 proper,
her the shosld make order 20 compel Mr.
NJ Mr. but leave latter 20 his remedy staw
Charles Bath ast Lewis g Wslthsr
The cOnders there blame on ths part OF psn-
til as TO the notice. Motion denied, without coats
SUPREME COURT-SrgciAL rERN-DEcIsoNs.
49,. = tyil,.,,, n 49, .n,no.ed innstic