New-York daily tribune., 1854-03-27
SUPERIOR COURT ssscIAL TKxn
DrcIgOSs-Narch IS.

TSan.. NIssols ~. Louis. P. S,eAsIis
DvER. j. The application Of the wife; the paiani.
eoHrsn hsd deliver nsi esia.a %
Gaze ssd etoAT Tpsa iis decree and spoa .asv
Ss s MAJ ss ss s ssI SnSs 90 % s
viii he SesIsa Cat ,As
s ss i.s ssss s 70 % t.sS 5: Soss q
nsht ss Oe ae 81, s M S. er.,eS G ,ad ss. "a, as
sra.n tk remedy ,, So ssseausa sssas the Pssa
:'.h s.lrss: sl'a g "a (. -0ad ''
settled wSs nd % Wa J.ssp sst osOrss cA.ps,,
Mo,on Gu re r,s PsiaI ot eo nssa . Eol.as g
STe the ceDsr. It p.Tsa ,e,, -. s.sss ssa sss. e.
us 'r 'Ss 3s nis 2 ss s. @s.
IN lie esa,Os sspsrsd trou1 except Ssast vey
..;s,i S,s s... 'as ..nS 4s Here css;
Dsi seIdsa v, samuel Lent sad others .s,.
Faeepcns Report Of Referee everuled kees coanaeS
u" ''' NiIH-u, Ceoke ss.rst Asnsoa II. Casss
bad od dsa &c 3ssaa.as ssss,,a sssiSs
Of s e: xSa a. .1Ssn % ne PSs s, :.. sh:s s css
had eu acquired % dwelling HOUSES % a,
5s d S' 81. 81: o. q Ss Saa.aI sS ss g: "a
tst CT Of HssA thereof TSss ss :Sps g S.. ,s as
The cr Of demurrer that several eaa'ss OF scsion aa
He'd thst hsd The demurrer been Hasd those p,r Of
the complaint which esfsd 20 the len aud esd assigned me
& ss have Sesn sa Sas Ss' s sSSssI The
nIo aoe no 'ses te.n s ieevyss
the judeon the Court there osc.oa the form f
complaint and esrsEy such improper juespq u dineA
s of action ,iss,a veusfler Sssasa wih fibea
Su IA sat, dass sowea ,6lnba hs demurrer aass
sIi0s .ls ssOns rcevs 20 'h saoa a'aai
se 10 day. thsreai slsvsd Ss,sa5sa 80 sa,wsr
The complaint that the Saia hsa bArsanei aud sod to
6epdsn aud his sPecs Iesuss lad delivered 70 oes sre
sooe eehssdhe ard bRees nsies o. se Sslo Of sS s.d
that there s remained due them thereon the ,sm Of se
r which wiss Interest the, las t,lss,as
but the only Esd ssas the eoE.n, dit act aver
cn,tcn Held that osy neessy whsn tho
bt Of the plaintiff. 20 rsnAa hs seten deends apon tas
prsr.hp bot without being pataon shy mSd Grove sns
oat contract ara rron sass proof oe entitled
recover the ebsetioo wa ase a. as Ss,s
DsmuIreT oyeuled aSd jujsnen. Ss olsinas v a
The object OF the eonpiso compel the OF ~
puty alleged have been bo1assthsd 90 the pAna ,, ae VII %
tate OF tho le.ser Upon an ada, sta ns tas Anes o%sss
rsseed the STATE Of oao application was se for ca order
dreens service he her by pnoet'n ue
sy .r,sd wSp tho City the sctoa bns ths ovsy
iossrest in real P;o?esy
real estate witha Cy Application denied
@ Clerk sp Wa Farley
Motion that the should be made defu % and cor
.in The complains Sy,sd that TIE dsfendsa vas asasssa g
upon reqo.ss toward the bulldog Of no Ia rsah
snd from money found due from the deenta to As Plann
not stating With sufficient osaty whether the paoh .oosht to
one two % se'oa and u apoa Two s
granted but Psntia Sss psrai"ed g amsad without costs
Defendant had obtsaed th,s III. paaG should Al, q,
euiiy for show on the % Of Ap s.ns ptosssa
sasVi Of a.seaon BY the surety served copy se
sds, upon dsfsndaus attorney aud upon an ahs,
o. o. sbo"ss Ss Ss words Of the stu.s R h Es h
been literally followed sc tn,sa,on hid b,ea sy
sTsnted ,e..
ts,ilst EsFme,s Fire Insurance Conpsay
eSs CounyTo policy Of Insurance sesdf re-
fsrree TO- Tao case 'sttlsd and withdrawn.