New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-12-05
Law LVI,ELLLG ENCE.
SUIT FOR DIVORCE.

CIRCUIT coURT-DEc 4-Before Judge BoossvsLr.
Frances Chd' BY Llsses " smp.oO it, her next friend.
sgt Solomon Chnds
This case continued.
William Chds swom-Is brother Of defendant;
our parents reside 10 Cincinnati defendant arrived AZ
Cincinnati with his wife, 10 June, 1886 no was taken
i'll with the cholera after bis return and d'd DOT ateod
10 businestil the following September he returned 10
NeW-YOr abOuth 18th September, plsintib had been
there ali the thu. from June Ia then; Sas acquainted
with plaintiff about month previous to their mar
rsge; the question OF residence had besn discussed;
sisted that they should reside at CINCINNATI plain
til remarked that she inoierent-that happiness
wa the chief aim; some hing was said about defend
ant taking tie house Of plaintiff atoer bat defeni-
ant did not conclude 10 take it, and said he would
prefer board afier ey got 10 Ciucinuats the ques-
lion Of residence az ain spoken II, plaintiff com.
paiL ed that there operas and ais &c, and
that .h- much preferred NewYofk; the defendant re-
piled that be had 10 be- guided BY circumstances that
HI. business WA in Cncinnsti, The living cost more
a. New.iOk, and be could not Afford II; every once
Ia " he these discussions woald take place; nvara-
Bis Mrs Cbilcs expressed herself dispeased and da.
and Unhappy, and that she wanted To live la New
Yorb tired in riding about, to reconcile her ~ I'm
cnr sti and Defendant alec proposed 70 rent house.
but that she obs saying she wsutei % 90 10
New-Y0Iki plant expressed love for the itniy;
defendant came here assin On IN porIshl oasnss' ~
September, 1850 he did not at hrst give cohsen, W
plaintiff coming on with him nntn Day or TWO Do
fore bis departure; che said she must come on W
New York TO see her folks, ana INA, II sue uio ny
persuhCe him 20 remain here me wD"iu io1un ~.
tim 10 Cincinnati; the principal objection defendant
tad in being p New Yoik Wa ths he couid not sup
TON k.r here he told her that u he brought her On
10 weold ma, return with him. They came on to-
ostbsr In e@rssqBsnoe Of the failure Of our house.
sss,nsrt wa, telesrsphed at New York on the 10th
20 s.,,a.sb.r and cane Immediately home, getting
90 % d. ID or I'd Of October; our vhoe-ase es-
as.bnsnt was stopped in January or February 1851,
onryssil store on the 18th 81 April knew Of his
ssSng wrirtsn letters TO plsint II; he was educated
- csImsDy and showed them 70 me 10 translate into
Fnol.b; Bel Forrest used 10 Wake purchases 81 our
refsl establishment; have been at her house; ~.s
not then married. never saw solomon Chids, de'end
ant there; defendant also Srots letter 10 piaatn
faiberi knew Of him seq ding dry good 70 PlsHtn
| never solomon Childs, the Defendant, ~
house Of III fame, az. never saw him IN company
with lewd or SUSPICIOUS womani the geoera on1so-
ter Of defendant Tor chastity Was excellent; l was
oHce il Bell FORESTS house, in Crosbyst sfter sns
| removed to THY. City; che ssked ne how came 70
| New York, ~ che thought could not come on l
told Der We were doing business and should 90 90 u
/ our own Dsmes soon again.
| The Wines was asked and answered 9uesfons -
10 the block in Cincinnati where solomon l. simpsoA.
In his testimony spoke Of seeing dsfeadsn, eoso
latter going. a. he ssid, TO Bel FORREST" no