Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1854-07-14
20.

law ar regulation "lir may nav" N.-'tH pro- !' VIZ"
aC! II aIX -: March, .lccJ Hundred and iwcNE,
ether prn;rc;iug establishing, prohibiting "r "!IH!.-
Iul rinv"rN. In other ':u.s nut liza: I'll" .a"~ III
',u,-ti" -hni! n" h" ,yivcd, hu slmiv tia" -" "r
'il undertake /" r"Siv" them. ANY vhi1iy ar i"!''
"hirh mnv Hr inherent ~ them, :: !''i U9TphTr'-
and uu:"n"hcd. Il they int" br- GiIs,", H.
hi. w'ii and good. There l. mothin. /" ii..rG.r'.
with il!'I. We on" thGt W" viii not c"l.'rr.
t" n"=h;'"n "i rrrA''i;'on' MO u" affirmation ~
protection. W, do No; >mv thai The laws III ua~--
Hl shall ne! liN' again. or do 10. nov INr uIii we
-nv Ia,. living or dead. this bill lcavc> ih,n =
tlri~ them !; only dorr not rc-cnGc :hcm F"n@rr-e
,IDr- Not propose Ia lt3ssn'" up"r. "r d,stu'"
them. hut clear "t them, and urctlaes Iu mo-
lie w:;h them IN liz present ncii"u.
can but think that perhaps the difference Hotw"nn
my colleague iMr. MILrsoHl md myHri" ~ {" ti'"
i'ad.,r prnviso may t." traced :" Gi'irrcn"" IL "rr
;"ws as 10 the Missouri restriction |, b,hol ~ :
/, r wholly unconstitutional satisfied VIII! ;'a.
d.. .nrGtinu ni the !rf that II l. "in""r1tIN" Huh
void" Remembering tn" mnxim. 'eT R'hH" nj "i'
an! at much les, rnn the aJr"Sai"n "i nT.HE nr
the rarcn; "i my thing | an "i ""rGS" ""r"'"-- -'
reference - all sGch matters H. the pro'i-" 80 ar
considering. Ny colleague an ih" other hand, Ne.
ics ing, am inclined {" think he d"cs, IT." ce;t'''
liun constitutional aud operative, m", UrmH'I"ty j.!
cards :l- relation {" Laws, which existed anterior -
iia passag", III light very variant from that ~ "'h
:Aa: relation nppcGrB ~ me.
But i, may hc asked If the Missouri line br GH'o"
s;u.ulIL in"prr"':rc, aud null Hhd N"d. WY "" J
desire is repeal For many reasons. wish al" j..
.n,utc books uublrinishcd, BY any unjust, nid.
,lpl uduus enactment. ] would -iv" pcn"" I" ia.
l!gm ant; cm;i.i'ucc 10 the South. | ""',IG hiN''
the great question Of her ri-h's EuG"r ;n' t"n-i..a-
,,n,, ,urumhrrrI of ,Iyc;-r co,rcns iuuai =, uI,
and nv constituents aesurc, that any discriminate"
,u;,,.. ar ii.uatu,t Uuuu their RIGHT ~ cL',l ur
and enjoy the common property OF he '"'"'r - .r'
Iilaird by the Representatives of III" l''i"' - a.
ilr,, ,irrllr,d voiI-ayr. ~! void. ! must F.p,s'
Inn wnl for !o, in this comurN Nium. Il is M.
,ir ,n my yars' 10 hen. tho Missouri restriction pro-
uurucri, n, ,Lis bill prououurns il. "voiL."
I'm, .u,,,,,s.. were wrong in r ::;s. Why si.nW,t
we ,t;ck. about the Burgrr prnS!,". ia fac" -: IL"
i,,.i - truly anl ,rumphuu;lv dcClarcf, and dw,h
n, ~, h tw,, Of INV cnur;-ue- who have zone hc.r,
me in Til, discussion! mean oi Ill" iuc, ;t:
in ~. Stat. OF the Union h;, slavery lc, "a introduced
hy po,;iiyc rrisla;i0n but III every il ljH- h"u
pi,I,rd and grown, and tnurishcI, upon tiat N'rS
i,b,hi >a which, IN it, least favorable a,pcct for tie
South thir hill must b" admitted! "a -rcur". leA ~
not however, ot Il Icrri!ory's brLii- igb"" ,f'"'
when ;ir Consultation Is its Iaw. Call ratIhrn place.
where, every RIGHT OF every citizen nt every HtGir.
,lnvrholLinG and non-sav,oILug. Is filly a"cIr''
and uro,rctrd
UnI | tiluc [ should be- pleased to d;-cu-e "'ho.
yirw- which hav" been taken OF this subject. They
hny. however been so ably presented by iilus' ".'
i IVY ,,I u ,m, ,I,, I Lu,,v | can ,LrL un r,.,,
i ii'" l ,;m,, sin ,j,,. ,r. rirrrIa,iy... lhrv
; .i,,r,,,. ,,lI,. sur,.' I ruul,n i,,ri,,rr 4
=, ,i,,,, :, ,,;u.. ~, u,c,.,si,y h,. ,,ry I,f,-
; Vii IL, mn, hnIL ,hn, !, i, u,,.., .-y - l..l
~ ,,, i,I j., ,rIr =, ,y,.,iI law, uy,,g +; ,r,.
,; ~ ,lu. s,nu, rather irvccal tia;. with rur.l
ur;z IN view -. tia, which now gli'trr> hr"r" "r
',rosn uuy body should boryn about law, which p"r
IIy r,,t Inv. Iu, n ,,rhlr,l la; never a r!'tc .3
,,,;I, ,,,',r ,.i,I,r Nebraska -, kn,i,a~ WHY. 81.
hn,l c,ui.ruriou now -. ur,S>,~ uIu ;l,,-. ,riiu-
ri.. thu; their organization hn- h,-'nnr uI-lcr-n-
lilo W., W., have no kiuwiu,..s, 90 h =, ..l-cr "a.
- ,,. ,i,un nt either i;,. man ..r :.,ro llur, ~.
,. ,nr- T,.u.rj ,rulrr. ami such .i;,., a.. tn.
r,I;u ,r. ,,.,,,, Il Z, hu, Before, nIr pr'hHs,u %,
I,ni,,, ,l,ni " h,. +. .,nn w,- i,,.-t ..' ,r .-
r'r,,.,, = vill.;r.,, -Irmirlnlly but urrY r,r:..
,ii, ,r,.rr fin. ,.,niu,u of Flaic-vitirnr' r.,i,-
,rL ;,,la in,,. nr institutions. Ard. !"d,,d l. -
,',,.,,;,,,"J ,,m,i v,.r, r,r.u,ly.
.,,, ..d nn,lin. T., iir. a" Argument If the son
,,nr who moved iIr rroyi," Mr.. THd-'r.i "r TINT "i
my. friend from rrul.,>-,r iMr. Suiih.I which j.
I,ur H. il !, c,uri;,,iyr rinv sliuw tyuIld CuIr,-
y,r.y ry,u, ria r,nIun las, -."ii "A statute. y,rh
r,I ,,,Ir !; IT,, II r,,.,,L,j ;rr ar,l- ,hr ,ir-t
!; ,Lrly ryi,.,l ,yi,Irrf ;,l,,. formal word
'.. :; t,',,rI ,,,,,,, .I. u,,,, mr..
wa : , i i.l i;.,.,,;.' = ;',,. n,J ,,,,r,rl.L H..
@ W a., ;,,. rI, ,f,, ,,,,,ir.,.,
,'S S, ,Ii r.I..Ln,.,,. lin j. ,I au,. viii. 49,
;,L' ,i ,rnyi.n !. ,n.x and iu ,i.,II fer with.
,i,. ,Lr ,rry.o Inc bin contain, Il rln,t explicit *.
.; -. i, ..,rr. ;nf,,, mad ,ru,..'' ,,,.l j. t.,
Ln,,u, ,yi.n No p'ny'.. uI -. ;iug. 'i'rolrE.
.nn, To- lryi,air slavery mi" amy Territory az >i""
no. tn cxciuG" it thcrrir"m.
M"c"nvcr. Mr. Chairman. seems |" me- N'iN r""i'
that Is tu territory aCir,! rrI France, &S NrlTt'
ha ami kans:s wcrc the rul" "t III" civi, nnd moi
.IIut of the common law governs the gC .ii"n W. a
NJ rr,s,I, rnr,rd, r!?-. There Is .u n"'--"ry r.-
r,,,n Int,,.rru tiii, government ii hr cU!U!mH
I, J ,L,r ,,nr,,u,, az crr ns -,-.i,i,> ui.i, N"Gr
";ynd from, En.,rmd, the rnnmon law iurnirh,- tire
,,.; ~ am, iuri.rrd.ur,. Bui III" civ.l law -;,'
in the same relation To- territory which n,u!r~t
..u,u Frur.r that the c,il.iuu law dno r. thar vj,I
.y. wan from, Er,la,d Now huih iAr S'Iht"r-
.r,, ,,isuu iI,.nrrd ~ ,lcY aIr ~ the civil inv
,n ~ rim; tb.. common law ruiz" in rr.,r"nrr ia.
rt.rt ni IA. rcpcnl of It requesting statute. '"'~ no
u!,:uu in the civil law. In that lnw II "r''~ u" y
;,..I En;,hr rc those senator. has niii objection
=, ,In rryi., Both r.,ar.i i, n. cnrr.v n,n, .l..
f yi,, ,,r :,
U,t IN finn, sur; ni .yun,cnl >',rci which Da'
.fnrr r,r,' confirms me- | can h~l,.iv touch li,-"
pn;p,s and invite, attention l." them. II ANY ""r %
,L,,, h >II nixon -l.r, i. IN end To- t, o.o,."a-
,J .,,.,;,., ,Io ,rnyi-n au.l We NAV yory -. {,
dismiss ilrm from further consideration.
After all, with mr, it is sufficient that l" bill Civ.
us in the vast and rich d"nriin n Nrhrnsk mmd Ia
sa. ,h Constitution OF or country in cxcuu, toy 'h'
Missouri restriction. lh"r"-ur"n III" Constitution
an w!lnC ~ r. IN" rights nud hr Interests {" lnNs'Ii
md those r,.prcscrt' Through MI IL" timc--pHu
wells Of ingenious critirstn which lee tmrc'u
around ;is subject there Will lcru out. the gran
fact. that at Inst l" question il between In" Msr"rg
-esricton which ins:l;s ih" Suuib, and forever -
cludrs her from Nrbra-ka nmi KRnsa-, aud 'hc '"
~:iiution which rccognIrs "rr "Grniy, tut np''r
them iuly and freely 10 our occupation.
Mr.. Chairman as n Southern man. my heart ,raj-
a, the thought Of abroca'ing to,'"'r tla "ccur''':
! tigi!b sCc,IOR.' which d"c!arc- uS inii"!' h''n.-
T... III. Hi and ,,r one sAGll draw Il deeper art
-n- lrr,,b ,hnn ever before; ir ~Es born nude .ir
~ IN, tr;c,in, ,,, ,nl, when il j.. reno, r ,nu
=: ,,,f n,d ~, co,-,,urnr. tl, admitted ,,:r.i.
'c'' m''r' 80 49, :. ,I .,,,,r,. lVLn rai won.
! o' "'' ",''' ''!.' D ~; 81 i,;,:.,.;.r, ,,lii,. =.
der at thc Gitr TVS! P'"-'' VI : ,.
t"ngrc; si"nin :n'" - ~, '''''', ;,:, ,',
Your -iatu:" Ob"", D"i is '""'' gu ''' ,''ir
mise. II j. not s:raiG" TINT innH'WN 'hlIr I'i '..'
! rtjou of rlnyc institutions while Jagrgah |"..
INV, ,,nI,.r :, ham.
~ H. b. .f-..f. .