The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-02-18

v1o1400I n
rossts the guarantee OF trssiom 10 N-brssba
There II still another and not sss serious aim ,uity
You call the slavery laws Of 1850 compounds
the slavsholdjpg Esd slavehodiRs 6stcs For the
pusposes II this arsumeOt let 1t b. gesntsd that thsy
were such . compromise It vas, Deverthslsss,
hon Mexen Esd BY the letter Of he cornproiss II sx-
sesded further Can nov, sct which Is not
niss bet. cen tbs '.%s pntiss bat mare ord
OF that mpromiss OF 1850 rgiops ory excluded
IRON It, but absolutely protected from your intervention
and ins.st.d With s.ssaty .esrosy interior to that
which hallows the ooDautution tusltf
Can sbe coDpronise Of 1850, by ordinary sct Of
IessIatios BE- sxssdsd bey nd the plain known axsd
tept end Of the parties 1t the time that
contract was %.ds and ,s be binding ON th: parties to
you absogste compromise BY passing Law Of less
dignity thas compromiss II 70 Of what value II Any
thsss bills violate both Of hs oompromsss-n,t more
thst OF 1920 than that OF 1850
VIII ysu maintain In rsunsnt tina. Is understood
BY the parties interested throughout the country BY
either Of them BY any repressnta i've Of either, 10
sh~ houss Of Congress that the principle then ssta
bhed should extend boy opd the limits Of the territories
acquired from Mexico into the territories acquired nearly
Atty before from Frame and losing undsr
Senator'S may vote, but do know what they win
say. spPssl 70 the hrorabls Senator from Michigan,
Ssr. Css. } than whom meme performed NOR: dis
tpguished part IN sstsbsbiDg the promise Of $780,
whether he no intended understood appeal to the
honorable and distinguished senator senior rspresen
trguished par also DID he understand the eompro-
niss Of 1862 appeal to that worry c,tnguishsd-nsy
iu.trons man. the senator from Missouri who lsd this
Opposition here to the compromise Of 1850 Did nm.
c-rstAnd that that mpioniss in oysrrsachsd
impaired the compromise Of la20 Sir, that distn.
euthec persop, while opposing the combination OF
vsrsl laws the subject Of California and tho territories
ard slavery tgetEsr, In bill. to ituss
compror iss. Dsvertbesss voted fer OF
h severslly end In that way and that way only thsy
Of them asbsd and impaired the Missouri oomprs
mice We all know he would have psrshed before hs
would bavs given II his support
suhor OF both of the comp omises 10 question from his
bonosd though YET scarcely grass covered grave and
chAll any advocate Of this confront
'mperious shAds ard that In making promise
OF 1850 be htesced dreamed that he subvsrdns
~oii Il 1880 Sir Il that earle spirit Is vet ,,nssrieg
hero over the scene Of his mortal lsbors and
heart Is now moved With more than hu man insea.uon
.s.inst those .ho are psrvsrtng his last pubic act
from its legitimate sses, n t merely to subvers tho
column but ~Yench from its very bed the base Of the
cepmn that perpetuates hts fame.
Apd that other proud and dominating Senator Who,
sscrifcipg himself the aid vi bout which the
promise 1850 osuld not have been sstabshei the
ssesman OF New England, and the orator OF Ameriss
thor bis unettsrsd spt may be- wandering ia Spheres
far hence thai he intended to abrogsts dreamed tn
BY virtue OF 10 conssqu Of that rsnsacon the
stsfcur comp omEe would coult be aSrogAted
The portion q The Missouri omise you propose to
.srogsts ,he ordinance Of 1857 extended to EsoAka
Hear whst Daniel Webster said Of that ordinance ITSELF In
1880 10 this very pla,e 10 reply one who had under
valued 1t snd ih "a hor -
I sp,te dr. Of ths srdin.res Of IT'S, which prohisi.
sure ~i.ssn and iorshsusht .ad which ha'
qlenoes.
Ar hssr what he said here, when advocating the
compromise Of 1850: -
Esiff 5
until Il syerhrown chat thro Is mot a this
s.1 sSsi; a Z:
asss
ton az this government
What irrsps.nse law or What Law Of any kind. axsi
the character Of Nebraka free territory OK
espt the Missouri compromise .ct2
And no~ hear what Daniel Webster said when vindi
eating the com promise of 1850, 1t Buffalo, Ia 1851:
My OPINION Yemsin unehangsd WAS not within the
s.snh .sops Or ass.e Of sas constitution y sdmi.
ans 's
81 n.a.s SCcid consent and never have
beyond VIA, tho old thirteen States had At the time Of the
show hi. face 70 m. sud s.y he osu prov.
,hs. ever S;ps,.ss from sh.s d:s:ns would
sd z l.
That compromise was forced upon the slaveholdipg
States ane upon the slavehoidng States mutual
exchange Of equvalsD The equivalents scesrats
defined aed carefully scrutnised and weighed by ths
The squivaents offered the non states
ton Of the pubic trade in District Of Columbia
Toese, and these only, the boom erei TO them
r.rs required to max. The waiver Of the Wimos pro
viso n he Of Esw ke1ioo and Utah
.lavs law w.re the only boons proposed to
The savsholdpg Snt~s and the only saorhce sxsoted OF
We. them .s.s.d .,ospt those hitch @s.. IN Z.
OF SLAVE territory the Of the BOUNDARY
between Texas and New Mexico By line that was a. last
tories to the respective parties hsr rss peeti shares Q,
fee so and slave soil according tho articles Of annex
10 ave opsr bleeding In the federal System
scd no more vhos needed surgery, and to which the
eSp,d%i's o,issS T.s to b. sS.sspi.:m. W, I'll know
District Of oou%bi. diahoncrsa and the rendition Of
this catalogue Of national Ills And now sir did the
Nashville Convention o. aecsss ,nsts understand that be
ess the enumerated Blooms offered tn, slavehoeiDs
States they to have also the obsrAtion tbs Mis-
souri, ccmpromtss line of la2ts they did Why did they
set ard .orn and ,esut q the cempromtss Of ls5o'
nonstrapess understand that Nebraska v. an Additional
d., Why did they oms to against the
Of that too, well Of the other Eve BY the cAlapm
had hsa ss.s Missouri DOM
tbe ompromae Of 1857 what representative nom non
Not What Senator from slavshoaing slate would
have voted for it9 Not So sntirsls was it then IN
Missouri premise lice Of 50 deg so min In ths region
qufed from France that half Of that long debate
on 10 %1s Il from
y
III new territory We had acquired recently from Mex
TO- until 1t shoull osappeAr 10 the Of the Pacific
Ocean 10 SEXUAL federation o. slavery in oil
OF this territory thai should BE- south Of that line
ard there propositions we're resisted srsnuousy
csssuly to the last BY the representatives OF tn NON
ala vsh rs States, In order II II possible save
The whole Of these regions Ter the theatre OF free
admit that thess are only negative proofs although
they ensnt With senvicton Bat hs,s whios
10 not Only affirmative, bat positive and not more eosvs
tbsn sopclutive:-
In fifth section Of the Texas boun larry BILL one Of
The acts constituting the compounds Of 1850 tnsss
~oidt:-
divided, That nothing herein contained shall be con
70 npsr or quality snythins contained ia ths third
lie IL the second - on Of the Joint resolution
nsng fexts to che United Ssats approved March 1876
her rsgards ,h' numss- OF states hcrssr
fsue ed out OF the state If Iexas oths swiss
what that third article Of the second section OF
hs joint resolution for annsxing Texssf Here It Ia
New STATES OF sveni mt size NOT exoeedtng four in
rumser addition =, said State Of Texas bsvag
ppiop mty hereafter BY the csBsett Of said state
tte TERRITORY thereSf which shall entitled
ss'or der the provide, Of tae feder,l oonstu
Ard spch stses IS he formed cut Of hat portion
sad territory ny south OF 30 deg ~ min nsrih latitude