New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-05-18
cED or NIT (. "-iRD.

~. ~. - b r.l,u
erSTt,,,l /, Ia. lbs 90, icu' n tn as'iee aud
msasu.nty OF tie Amer 80 E.STe, w0Iiu go, Syr
Stsgdo M a.. yorr o.cc. y, ',''' = - 60.
may well - cousocr,d p,cus. in the tni.od etses,
VIII rs y laws h-v. hitherto ccn respecIed ma ~""fe
the er' e iury hHs gained a. hh a." -.
nal ,ss',. Acquitted kou-i ill accnse' re, nyss
m r,r~ecV'cd, must app y, through the columns ..
~ pm 20 your generosity ard be- SUSPENSION i
orn.cu nnti dc evidence Ia my ga De land oe'e'~
Ic,n blame no ,." e,r feeling on. prejudice against
nm. or G exp ,sg .hc lo,ues. co nnslion Of that IN
fortunate tc-d Which has been drkly and inseulousy
eNa.gra'.i 10y cneuiss The rSbc have as yet seen
In, e dc .: this csse. end thu has been most nm
ser,,, u., u-, prseuou ~ those Eager for my blood
sr, ru.u have been acquitted by jury Of my peers:
r n r,ost cn~.S this ~,u6 be vin'oauou enough and
", IN ,i, case - rvcr1d cs has cecn my ecqux;al
.,eri q, icrat t.g1c pftsNni"v" =" iHy uineSeice,
sri. b 70 sdaeo IL, a',: hlSae 70 pAae an .ney
rs, \ -, ne the testimony r.t'1ttt ti my uiai. ihs
eul H., and >rit,y !, Is ti.a' Tor man 70 ask who
las rcoinv la;sin- subc' 20 - a'ci as nave dome.
ui erd m.srii, se'.' 81 ~, 'sSon. q. VIC es .s
hs 3D. ht .r. \ -. rhagcson, one OF the
- 49, ID ,,f'' .l lie, IA the West aad will
VIZ. ~ f,,n ,.. III Ne-srs. ID. Appleton &
Co N,v.losk. Ahou ia ei' 'e ..he't sonnaoaI' IN
Nj i,l.. as ability a'l iararislity YET wnen re-
,-,rI M y, f,n,ercour>, ct y enemies the -ecauuon
va, taken o hove he opo. a'ed oy svn
;,ren whose positions place them above even tue soaring
sc,t ssi;,i. oi ne Coar.c. - a.,
And; ak from YOU Gcntcmen q the Press silence
unI II r, mort can be pln,, before the public ana you
DO NOT hs discover better reason for my aelu'tn
than thc ccrrrrion OF the jury au Wiling 10 'aot ="
your urvogssl condemnation. have msde no previous
atom. ~ resist the designs of enVmt>-h'' ~ ncy
uosI falsely asis;o b.caUso had no deienee - maze
ht. cause rgncd with confidence on the Just aih""
tr.tnp tho OF o,uatrv. break t~' siehVo
now which tie better Judgment Of trends iothesiy nn-
posed ur, me- only because my 'cu'"rs seem !" nay"
los: all .sr,os for law and have constituted thcmsc'vea
li,l,r tribunal 70 tlo dec SION at ~! IcH'y
,mpsnu,l,d ~ .ho proper su.- ores ci the Sac
Once more appeal Ca the psty ~ the P'>' h tn~
coppr, and ,onUre every editor IN tie name o Ji''ice
and humanity "a read The report al nv a, w. "a wen
he testimony GA both sides aid thea declare 10 Tue w1fd
wLc,hcYt have 10: the r-h 20 snv hat injustice hach
in;rstce hs~ bc, done Aud n MANY agc csnN"'ed
~ the testimony ;ha; my -S,cutcrs nave no. been '~
aimed IN the c.sc which nc mud, out against me intYe
900 nu, confidence IN the Iaumity OF AN gcln ell
tor ~ doubt ha they vii eouics that they have oeen
n.,sd and viii eNposs the Unusifah.o means used ~ de-
,ei,o tLc,a ana - urc inc. be ju. he generous gen
ienen o ia, pres Read this c orr and CONSIDER closely
its couton.s. -,
u, I0r,.rRe Conie- his hoovc proposed 20 publish
my tl IA uauplo; form tut the gentleman who was
Ell, loved lv this paper l. no. senographer, AMI no Ie-
mont co. III Io he fun ad satisfactory IN all the details OF
Nstnuatou ii IN. u',e- fairly publisher
Mr. C,.y oud not knyw, make unfair report Tor any
consideration: but from p9st experience oudupehsnd
le al, within notes before they
,e thc Ilht make this gss,ion for his s1he as wen
n INV own II is fact worth noting too, that while MI
Co Was rrclurng this report ot The L0aisrt Courier,
he wrote letters to his pol-r Tie Crcnan G"set, IN
Will l.. .Npresscd an opinion that would be acquitted
which was based ON the evidence in the ease We may
b,r,flter hive an opportunity of comparing M Coles
orinion Of the testimony with tho veI son n, to"'p
nl ,',e ~ ;f MATT. I. WARD.