The Cadiz Democratic sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1854-1864, 1854-09-20

A''e Fl1Ffe-SI y E..s susaszrs-
Let klu. lin- lse.r,,s

- 20 i -fr.rt = = -
let tiv-i 5ia5 &s.Tale.:
! !. S1s,oa pkpefs oi ,hs ts-Lly have
al along claimed that ''Nebraskaf' is he
grea' question az issue, yet these sane pa
psrs take decided stand agains, ARDREw
tsrcAkf. The Democratic nominee for Con.
gfess v 10 voted against and did al in his
power 70 driest Il e measure" % which they
vlaim 10 be- 50 bi,crly hostile. Was there
even such giaring ineonsisIeucv-suchb bare.
hced hypnoriSyl Cannot every Democrat
Z every Free Soiler--eyery honest Wing,
from ihl> circumstance alone, see through
Tine trlcSvry ut the iu>Iun leaders? The r!a-
rms heohs!s'eney VI the greedy spoil seekes
nov siFnds ugl in bold rei!ei--nohe eaI bS
deceived,
F.! Tie toI'owing frop contemporarg, is to
the point, and iurcibly SHOW es The nypocrisv
and inconsistency OF the tpsionists:
These ami. Nebraska b, mocratic papers
tLSE regard the fusion movement in Ohio as
msry Poilica! game Tor the defeat of the
Democ!aey, aud ihe triutaph of a mixed up
mess Of pJaliciaps, receive daily eoutrma
I'm Of the opini n. The opposition agree on
one thing aud only onel--They all profess to
oe opposed 10 The ex ension Of slavery into
h1hsAs and Nebraska, And we know OF no
Papsr or party OF lndiyidual that prerends
anything else in Osio. IeI the iusionists
claim vr,hudcxy ON lhis point, and denounce
all opponents Cf fusion as unsound and un-
worthy. The coalition ranks at present
strange mixtuTe of opinions on the question
upon. va ca hey have agreed to unitel
Some memuers vi the fusion 60 head and
heels roI the repeal Of the hill while others
thiuk Ii cannot re repealed IA me, or before
tie people OF those territories settle the Ques.
On for themSelves-whlle another faction
geton The platform, (Vhi, neither propos.
OF opposes repeal, and merely exhibit dis
position for agitation without plan or design
for the future. The Wings and Free soilers
and vary few Democrats, united under the
coguomen Of Republican" and organized,
as they say, new parry. This new party
should have agreed TO be honest, and then
adhere 10 the agreement il possible. What
are the facts? The leading fusion journal"
at the capital, few days since shouted
(prematurely) over WING victory in North
Carolina. with full knowledge of the fact
that lie Wing candidate for whom he shou
led was strong Nebraska man! In all the
Democratic countes of the State the fusion
forces are striving to be unit--every mo-
vement and nomination is made under the
great rallylng cry of opposition to the Kan
sas Nebraska bi!i-WhgS and Free soilers
are mixed up in the local tickets and when
necessity requires, n Democrat is thrown in
10 make shure Of success. Such is the ac
ton Of fusion partizans in democratic local.
nes!-How is it in strong reliable Wing
counties-we believe there are few of that
sort left in the State,in counties where Wing
gerry can stand alone? Do they call anti
Nebraska conv antionse and prate about a
union ot all parties to put down Nebraska
i'm? No indeed! Wing conventions are
called as usual, and n,thing but genuine
| Wh!sS receive nominal ons. fhe syren song
of 'rhe people" is not sang In such strong
holds the State fusion Is partially endorsed
and occasionally rcpudiAted! Wbig meu
and Wing measures still exist where they
have the Strength TO back them up, This
course is honest and consistent!--it is based
npon the anti republican idea that call
/ 'hIhS A'N inii VII llOllLlCS.
1t is well known that but four members Of
the strong democratic delegation in Congress
from Ohio. supported the Kansas Nebraska
bill. OF the ioar, three have backed or re-
NAMED oil the ,ack No one Of The four. hu.
Mr.. ODDS, is willing 10 ask for re.plection.
Several OF those democrats Of the delegation
! "ho honestly aud strongly opposed ths Bill,
are candidates lol reelection, md upon The
/ ground Of their correct position on thus ques
ton, should receive the suppor: of these
anti-Nebraska partzans. What are the
tacts on this point? Why, in every instance,
the fnsronistS Sc. up a nsw man against the
anti Nebraska democrat. Now, ii anti Ne
braskasm is the leading principle Of tie
rev party, what shadow OF consistency or
honesty exists IN the repudiation Of these
men and the strong effort to defeat them?
ltis charged that the patronage and infu
1 ence Of the adminilratlon was brought 10 bear
| i'll carrying the measure through Congress
| Ii the charge be true, should not these men
be respected and supported for their adhe-
renee 10 the anil position and their resistance
of temptation? Are they not equally wor
thy and much more safe than untried men.
according to the protes sionS Of the leaders
of the new party? All honorable men will
concede the point. that if anti Nebraskaism
is the main idea ior which the fusionists strug
gle, they cannot consistently oppose demo-
cratic opponents OF the bill on the score Of
principle. The fact is evident, however,
that they do oppose them. and therein is the
exposure Of the clovenfoot, and develop
mens Of the hypocrlcy of such professions as
are made. The people will examine this
subject in due time, and Judge for th,n
selves without needing the dictalion OF men
who exhibit such glazing inconsistency.
The last Buckeye contains letter purnor |