The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1854-02-04
THIRTY-THIRD CONGRESS-.
FIRST SESSION.


= Senate.
WASHINGTON, Feb. 8, 1864
GRsAr axunAKSr-GAILxRIno CROWDED.
Tho galleries and Hobbies crowded, and women,
against al rus and propriety, allowed to occupy
nearly N the seats In tho ports gallery where above
AL other places, silence ought to bs maintained.
RnuF BILLS. ETC.
Tbs private calendar was taken up
Ths folowfne bills passed without objsction-Fof
the rssf ct Albert HART Of Lavris Taylor; Of Allan g.
Johnson Of Adam D. Stuart; Of william g. FAetor; Of
Richard Fitzpatrick; Of Dan JaAn Domereq Of James w.
Low and Others for the capture Of the British pva
teer Ann duriSg the last Also number Of others
At O'Clock Mr.. DOUGLAS, (dsm.) Of III moved to
postPoas ba private eAsndsr which was agreed TO- and
rnu SHBRAsKA BILL
Mr.. OAAsa, (frss sof) Of Ohio, moved 10 amend the
sourte section Of the bill By striking out the words
ssdsd b the paepss Of the aes q 1880 known ss the
eompromise ssS He said that Tuesday last he had
Senator non linois he had nov much to strike out
from the bill BE brought no IN tserg into the cous'
dsIstioa q ths question ss 'ooisd ~ ,h me
Iobbss the unusual at dAnce Of ssnators, we're not
the result Of any psrsuar dssrs TO bear him out bat
satsrtassd in this question. At the comm snssmsnt OF
this Congrsss there was no exctement no agitation on
s%s sssss. sSs iass "a. here rad from tS. mssssss
NV D Oussres doubted tho accuracy Of this statement
ssvsry fhsy Who doubled tDis declaration Gid not BE-
Hsvs for the reason tina. they though. tbs only psrma
return % the aucIsnt policy Of confnDg slavery to the
limits o the States whore IL cxisted and securing the
iursdstion Of the general government. But They who
thought thus were but small minority, by some 70.
sa.ssS :. fasoni, By SON. Is asi.s0r, and sh, y al =
tlias y: quiet A. tn. eye turned % the heavens.
HAncy Of the Armament; but AL at onoe there was
ehinse: rattling thunder was hoard from the skies
sysb1qs Yvooul Ifrtcus Aye, sir, Greer prooss Afri-
eu NE south Wind was thick with storm. Who WAS
vno Ssd bs.n dsoOunoea ss I. stions had not rsnsvsd
shs vsxsd Territorial sg tation. Who ther did renew t
Who alsd the south Wind With hs storm but the faction
Yssouons he'd declared that the subject for ever
had declared that they wo1k pport man
And Wig Il rsnsweef Il bseause aAysry again
wants room-becauis SLAYER again wants terrory-ee
rest which had again the agitatioa and again
disturbed the quet Of the people, And what was that
was nov dsr audeds Il tsat sacred compA,t should
es rssoinded-shat compact shich had endured during
vhols gsnsrstion Of men, aad has for long period
been bald sacred and bond Of plighted faith
b. y. ~ssh Il. hsd resolved 70 .Sds Sss
70 be st aside forever rspsslsd. Some pro
ts1t had bssn dcossi By the senator sson Illinois, Who
In his speech OF Tuesdy last informed the Senate and
mise had S.sn superseded By the act Of 1850 Who had
ever bsfss that time supposss or though. Of or heard
OF that dsaf No 1t had remained for the Senator
20 make known tbs discovery TIE Senator had invoked
the spirit Of the dead to snstan i'm In tb idea he had
resrd to the statesman wbo had reported the compro
mise Of 1850 but that great statesman In his report In
his speeches. in his sons out of committee,
had never hntsd that the Missouri promise
supsrssdsd. Never Not word or line to that effect
from that Ssnator could be shown. Did any msu from
the North hs South duIng the long debate those
acts Of 1850, sess that they would superssds or
repeal the Missouri CON premise Not one. The oom
promise aots passed In 1850, They dsnDunosa at
The North and denounced at the South. DID spy do.
fsndsr q thsn :her North Or souta pa! hs vindlca
Of the nesoan compromise Not one. Did any obeotor
% thea either at the North ~ ths southplAss his
Missouri ssmpromissS Net one. No man, sithsr North
a South DEFENDER or olpenant OF the compromise OF
90 stood daring The CopgIsss The senator from II
linois then reported bin for Nshraska with pro-
sioa the subjsct OF slAysry and NO pr, vision do
Of 1850 Tos Senator his speeches urging the pas.
sage Of that BILL SSH word then upon the sab
jset. II was then well understeod that the Missouri
somproIss did apply 10 Nsbraks and no one thought
that had been repealed by the comproe Of 1860 Tue
Presdsnt OF The Senate In speech on the last days
last session. asserted that he had always dasp proved OF
the Missouri csmpromise anc had ardentJ wsnsd ib 70
yea snd that oecasion used these words + 10 svi
80 far that question Ia concerned We rnisht as we'll
agree 10 The sdison OF hs territory next year,
% %s nys or o se yssrs h hsncs.n This .a;honty he or
Southern man bad thought svsn then that the Missouri
scmPronise had ssen .nd JET the Senate had
peAsd thee years go re Senator from Missouri
vbo was dseply Interested ia tho question, had com.
su compromiss and had advised that It Be rub mttsd
TO; Jet the Senator & en Illinois Informed ths
nss tss. Bat tss ssr nsouIi ,r ,ecmrremi's had sssa
Msscnn nsds his speech The bill then pesdiDs, and
vhish hsd also bean reported by ths Senator from Illinois
pronts supsrssded nor had any one At that time auv
sasA uat had On the 4la Of January 1854 the ssAa