New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-11-30
Ian INTELLIGENCE.
slit FOR DIvOICE

SUIT FOR DIvORCE
THIRD nAY....WEDSEsoAy, Nov. y.
CIRCUIT COCRr-Beferr Judge RolssvsLr
Frsrce- l. Cards ~ L-scs n sirson Jr hr next f1end
81 solomon cAiiaA
Ths case was sO0tesef.
The deposition q Sarah Cross, 9 resident Of CIn-
cinnsti, VS. given in evidence snd rssd.
nan was inrocucei 10 ne BY Josephine Bates,
IL ls52, called solomon Cnlis rs cane to my
house several times Afterwards and inquired for
Josephine Bates, who was prostitute. He slways
with her.
Mr.. Grehsm resd letter f,on defendant to plain
tiff dated Nov. -, ls5O-says:
ter s.ar,ed 20 sod has % and ma nave concluded 20 20
to EuIoPe an 'e 70 cay eanno s"H5e Al me TINE yea
Ster ~sl viii 80 New YOrs T,E. ssrin the
to hOsrdwin h. botheI Se OF where II may suit her he
can ,.t from Ar BeruheinsF. Is sony he
sc "a aue ma before their departure Sends his love 10 al
he ,niiy tusirs 'hen) Your aHss,iossse hSsssed
Another. of Dec. IS, 1850:
DER FsSoEs ss.is with pleasure stsr nv return from
eeised the e,te. containing noeey ToeIs we're two
DE other half IN .nosh-r &c Speaks If having received
-rrr l. able when he can eoaie 90 SeS Jss
S.ppy sno rop,snird in Der home Regrets
respond 'tsuer with her brothers Sends his love TO AL sna
Another. 18th January, 1851, says he had the
pleasure on his return of receiving letter from her.
" slso from her brother. Wishes her happy New
Year, Nc
Another, 10th March, 1851. says: "Agsin he writes
4" her few lines. and hopes they are all in good
"besth. Is sory he CANNOT comply with her wishes
/" in sending her the goods she wished as the goods
of that lind we have sold ali out. Expects 10 90
Into the country and be gone four or five weeks.
Says their wholesale store is sold out and let.
GIVE his compliments 10 all the family. Speaks OF
going 300 miles into the country.
Another, cath March, says: a" He has not yet gone
Z" TO the country. SENDS 500. Compliments TO ali
" the family"
A Geographic Dispatch, dated Nov. 1880 was read;
few words in answer 10 one; another, Dec. g. says
she will board with her brother; another, sth Jan
ISL from William Child, says solomon is away from
Cincinnati another. Jane H. 1851, Cincinnati, also
from William says Solomon is in the country; latter
appeared 10 baye been IN answer 10 elegraph!c dis
patch addressed 10 him.
Mr.. Graham offered to putin evidence proceedings
in Cincinnati entered by defendant against plaintiff
for oeserop and that be intended TO shake his wife
OF Mr.. e.. said, when he let here, aud no did not
come back so that he might get res dence there q
three years in order to be enabled TO maintain suit
The testimony was objected to, and not considered
relevant by the Court.
Mr.. Graham said the case for plaintiff would here
rest.
Mr. Jordan wished that plaintiff should be COM
PEELED TO exhaust their testimony, except as TO rebuff
tai The Judge said that the rae, but was a
matter in the discretion Of the Court. MIR. Graham
SAID be knew the rule, and they were willing to take
the risk oil 1t.
DEFENSE.
Mr. Morange then opened tor the defense. He said
The plaintiff Il woman. and It Is natural TOR men 10
sympA,biZe with woman, 50 that defendant Is not
placed in an envable light. Mr.. Chhts nstwlth-
standing al that has been said, has lived life OF pu-
rity since his marriage vow. He has been pressed
into the trial and has come unprepared The case
was NAKED down by Judge Clarke, on Friday and
counsel for defendant dd not suppose lt wonid como
on this term. How could solomon Cbilds have been
here, when we supposed the case was down But he
- III be here before the case Is closed
MIR Childs long before rhe marriage, and to the
present Gay has been resident OF Cincinnati ms
wife chose to come 10 New-fork 10 live with her
father in splendOur rather than in Cincinnati, humble
with her husband. We shall deal with plaintiff the
some as with other plaintiffs, and when show the
nsduous conduct OF herself bee brothers and father,
toward Mr. CHILD we will ask the Jury 10 throw by
that sympstby which they would naturally feel on
account OF her being woman. Nothing has been
spared 20 get up this case. -Four or FIVE brothers
have been engaged ia it-and not only them but the
attorney Mr.. Amoreaux) on the other side, lett has
business here to ge 10 Cincinnati to get testimony
As 10 the child il has been sad that II has never
received its fathers smile. IL hos been stated that
Mr. Child left New York in September or October,
1850 and the child was born June, 1881. Mr. Child 5
place OF residence CinciDn it. He had no place
Of business here but occupied part of the establish
nent Of Mr. Bernhemer. Before, and at the time OF
the marriage, he was a wealthy merchant, although
the broiLer has stated that he dd not know what Kidd
OF man she married. lie was OF uODOunlel Cfedlt
! lie saw Frances II. simpson, and thought he saw in
her woman who would not only be friend IN pros
Uerty but friend also in adversely; but when mis-
iortuI laid Der hsnd upon hm this lovely aud sweet
womap es she bss been called, forgot her marriage
vow 10 cling 10 hun through veal and woe, aud left
him. After their marriage they went TO Cincinnati to
reside; whether the family thought Otherwise or not
we 90 not care. About August or September, 1850,
through series Of embarressfaen's he failed HIS
creditors were mostly in New-fOrk aud be came on
4 baooad IN with him and ha narmttsi
her T. do So and she went to her fathers AID refused
70 return again to Cincinnati with hm, and has ever
~ CO reiu ed and adds TO il by this proceeding.
Mr.. Moiapge then referred 20 tde complaint In the
case, ard The large plumber Of women (unknoWD) de-
fendaLt was alleged to have been in company with,
and TIE l'le proof they have addured. he SAID II
will be shown that the witnesses whose dispositions
have been read not entitled 70 belief, and he con-
tended that they had been procured for the purpose.
TIE late Mr.. Sanford the counsel said, was origin
ally engaged in the case for defense, aud his place
suppl.d by Mr. Jorcan. Mr.. NJ. said he SUI.
Irsed from the great amount stated in the pleadings,
that 20 little testimony bad been presented lie r.
viewed the deposition Of Bell Forrest and her 81 We
uent that defendant had been Of her regular aod
best customers for long time but she never knew
he was married man. She said he went 10 stairs
with Emily Moore, Josephine Bates and Safe'i
Cross. Mr.. Morapge said Mr.. Child was present
when their dispositions were taken, and they
stated that Solomon Childs had never visited
them, and they had never seen him, but a man
calling himself Solomon Childs had been at the house
The counsel i. ;imated that ms1 had been procured
to Witt the house and cal himself Solomon Childs.
Bell Fonest in her deposition, stated that solomon
Chlds had yisited her house in Crosbyst after she
came here, in company with two gentlemea-ths
woman, who has swOrn that she herself was ViftaOus
in the midst of vice. that she went went to bed early
and went TO market three times week. 1t VIII De
shown that William Childs, and not solomon, went 70
her house here in CrOsbyst. accompanied oy gen
Il. men--sDd that William and solomon much resenn-
bic each ether The counsel referred 10 the testmo-
ny, on the part Of defense, which he would present
George Hoadley Jr., Judge,l called by defen'e az
10 the locality Of Bell Forests house IN incnnati,