New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-06-15
law IN7ELLIG E'NCE
SUPERIOR coURT-Befss. Juss- se.~s.r-

faelrr at.
plau,i,f il mn engrsyer He WIS employed by Mr. b.
ed pan,fs N prI afrs vita Others. engsvins. or vol esi' f
"a. lss ssw' pa II, Pr.nes Leslie il bas
foI, Tisy worked In lsrse room 70 n, I'm ~. ~
cor 20 ~, ace y found Ia thei' room psi ~
s9d @ 90 . ors q r. ,s, a p,sarrd hs ,,t.ncs
,eeTs. ard the vaest se''ia. ,,. f,es wa
'' on, t tS, The present e a. recover
dsmss for alleged assault and battery which d,nsa = en-
suted by the Ias'r.'sd s.
is no. s r,s M, F,ps Leslie and told
.ut.fu,h'y 's 10 y na ~ IL "a, s~,-IoT-r Mr. l.
was the habit OF employing the thai tny received
ter Tsey received money regularly every s,ady night For
@ he worked nne hur' per day beside. which tay
a M sn.r sasTy md b. h.s; had ~crsed at
% la ',iy f}sR' las 1Sf 6G
and q, ere.,sd and ey 1890 aons ~
tey would thereafter know no employer eai w rrsnt
Wins. be considered the to be Il the employment, Of Mr.
b. roon but did not WORK awaiting The OF
Ms..,, B. MI Henry Beach came first sad noned s men
R.b srw,ra came finally three Police oeers were
brought but they len on esn' IG1 ey Is ' som asn .e
wt greater HgIse' 2. PSfs . cane o hold Of plaintiff BY the
cost make him out winch was the assault ana battery
coz bSs other Witnesses examined to the general
rurort Is the One OF them Z was shown haa snee inc o.
eurieree earsd sui similar to tins IN the "'n' NO"-'
M baif If Ssfense we. stated that Mers were pro
rerpy and literally paid; and that there could be no
an r the MOVEMENT NJ l. except on the par OF f
few perhaps they could obtain more
hrtnh him otherwise. but that Messrs D. eoea o
ecoi1s their POSITION would make them responsible o n-
acts on Nj l. The liberty quit the employment
and refuse stated that the whole OF the men
ere-pt plaintiff and anoterl resumed their employment as asea
the following day. -,
some rte testimony that of the officers OF po
lice v no he'd beer called in by defense.
charge said Messrs Beach barnum were
the establishment they had xht direct the men
nrr the ccuusance leave and their refusal 20 eompe.
them 20 Do 90 using force for the purpose however than
Wa. The Jury being short lime returned
verdict ~ of defendants
NCB,MBsRs-Before Judge CAMPBELL.
CAsE or THOMAS DUNLAP.
eoums.isn recollecied granted few weeks
since 10 ngur into Of Mr. Dunp florist Broad
Sv md he Jury returned verdict that he unound mind
and Con appointed take charge OF his estate ne
L.jre placed the BOomingdae Ay.um List week ne ws
Judge writ OF ha0ess eorPns 81 arrhy
.,ed demanded the ground thai he not H.
sane ne stated thar afflicted With ntammatofy rheu
at while he Juror on the DE Corn tTa and
denied The Judge considered AZ the time that the pro
eeds irregular n there should De regular
.preson 70 the Supreme snnul the Judgment respect
10 Mr. d. He would reserve his decision or DAY
two rendered stating that the Judge did
not have iuiisdcon application be 70 the supreme
which had Jurisdiction Hsbeas corpus discharged
HABEAs CORPUS.
named Mccarthy who had essted in the army WAS
brow up application OF his father and hts discharge asseS
on The sr md OF minority Proof being shown IN support o. ne
writ be was returning his military eonin
Trv