New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-06-05

woo,.r,1 H;ny 'ssi - :'s s2'as .s.
dosns The rraci tie purchaser a5 pay Tho psr
nerey % The VIII ths ssen y say bon, %.
.th q he .s'uf rpsisai q ssiy 81 Psi
iIoriss:s tbs. ;he fooa we. aee y he q .oa other
sou Tor ..le not such ps,5eai AID he pfafpA as owner
Al ssen sell goods hss ay pledge them 70 seeaf Al
% dyef II. & The 4 . ca T. s.ai sa &
them auction such recover their ao 70,
~Aiyr Tie t M ID. Of the goods nneh aoney
Hun. and Nelson sPoneents TIE oboSen Land Improvement
wooDRuFF JIn seiion 81 se owner. OF
the sneis Of snoihs boat oI n.s gT1fn. M
they miEh' have rd from rp rom Albany to whieh
their bosi bourd when injured BY ;he oolsioa
90, when sr stns s:.s oRs, 1. 70 % nah, o' t. .
,py wherever the two eo,i meet esh other whether
II. iSeis av Of n.visstioa -cscriss he same iss
the question Of sesis-ncs depends the particular
hs es.e sne net alone upon ne qsesr wn1 11Isd S
tuned Y he wIors direction.
hs I Es e' HAT SPssy
aer the Court viii aside the report Of referee uPon
a. upon p.p Ssy should have found ssrn an.
the .,1;i h. ns9s Of % s.rss . srs,y
mt -. q s eoIuption p'y OF some bad faa or
o'cqrnor. respondent, sg, B,,ley, sppell,n.
WOODRUFF IA judgment for the defendant, sct0n
contract ssn two who sought 10 be As Joint eoatrIs
70 an .; y he pn % r. .,,sS % S sSs, ere
ihe en- s ~ ts mr. go ~ woas b. eSnalt
defense the second suit then sich Judgment "oaa DC eoe'e
Parker Ie,Fesdaa' at g., R1Piasl appellant ant, ,
hss jurisdiction By The r''tenee Of ne where parties appear
xeusl occupation dunn. the tie which the seton
.us e. een Is er %onS Stie enable plain
til 10 Il. ,A iei a.. Mec aaey appellant
DAILY J-whee defendant has appeared in cause tas
'.ssH nsss S' Tie I..f Of
pend by default exists only in case where the
fned.
er be .S,a as iSa zen days ,ss,;
Raymond vs. Richardson.
TIE o~ Of -Jes uHss contain the srosnds Of appeal and 1t
In nei ea ne sfresl viii B. dismissed with cost,
Tho Mayor C - tIys,, ct a.
s =, ID Is At Of s sts. a.. Of Act
q H Lax 9a @ h' Of The Civ w Of !. De-
csTst and sde Punishable BY 9 or np,oasne1i
n n1 Or ss tie sh Of hs coPorsoa to prosecute
action for ard 10 recover such penalty % their own use
thn to her 5Sn S'e given by the Cy be
ssy s sy & G n sTsS enc he Law md
the rh Ordnance sand together the former does not repeal
When the dnds9 doe. On The t,, below ,n cos..
recisy WI il Dot claimed that injustice that
The appellant has any defense on the merits ,.
'.i-@ii san s s'I4fs
b. grcn adjoining premise. held be nal..aes
conflicting this
Court will fntins the Justice what
strictly queriOn Of fact Judgment affirmed
Wal ost HOase ~
pre 81 which referred TO that amount ~ the
existed a and the evidence wa: sufficient, pFm'
a Cook.
The holder Of mo:f.re on ps,soc' I ap under oh 1
for taking the property and
dpns the without proof Of demand of the defendant due
horsh he nter.t be subject to slevy sad
himsef liable wIong dOer. ,,,,
Van verdeH and Bsdg srreans a The Hudson River hN
DAILY JUne.. it clear that The injury By collision yh
Tsr should be left IS question for the Jury Judgment
Peters APPELLANT, sat. Dosy, respondent l..
Ia Plaintiff in Jue. Soe appb a. i, III, IN 1 PC S
nonsuf the ns If in bis udsment he fails upon ~. own
potency cheney Of the evidence and adgmen, Of non
Eu whether the the plaintiff submits non.
be the time when the case submitted 10
il The cause however submitted to Justice aud he takes
Plaintiff to submit to the Ja.ee it; and
4 the Justice sa IN sgeh pas ds%e.. ssooS sp
Je ,hoad 10Th when the summons ives Ietrrna
trial and the day which Judgment was rendered
Heyier vs. Onion.
wooDRuF IA competition deed executed by the plaintiff and
the defendant contained covenant accept 81
Per the defendants indebtedness in three nstalmen
.ueh payments should be in full .,ssciiOn
and n T of "a S S :Sas s HS
y provided Of the Defendants creditors
the signatures should be poeued and this was ADDED
rectvely would the defendant for
the sd debt manner modest him until the expiration Of
mer should operate absolute discharge Of all Os eomnuied
sn had the FIJI ped thu. limited within The
OF bis cred and that The ms nsnt was
defence action brought BY the aintH within the SIP
uaed time the inssmen's were paid as they became payable
BY the terms OF the composition deed
Bses spgeii.nt vs. Pierce respondent s =. v.,,
DAILY IA CLERK whose salary sntere at The END OF tae year
In hsI his at fixed,
upon tie previous year submitted
bis Pc n IN IN sd .ss Ds
that balance that his services were worth more M
ment for plaintiffs for SIS 3D.
ssnchey Fsulbery.
lection to the rroees. by which brought The
Which allowed .s smnd@s9, P % c before me sa,
cable the Marine Court ard under that SoIst have the power
take Held that such Il amendment could be made
Lyons Story. 1906 -.
the deenSsn. physician .houd certify by sick
mes, work further held that that ne should
e eos for what wo. hsa dome sa, that was
hey prepare and in the steamer to NewfOrs that they
Ebert. respondent. VS. Kelly appellant,
DAILY Jwhsre o. Islander, Of having charged the
psinaa with going Court .nd psung himself the SaIy found
proved in the most clear sasciory th, the plaintiff
deenSsnt swear to What The verdict and JUDGMENT
sde fassn; disregard Of evidence on the part OF the july
Buckingham ct 81 sst Oliver
TO s % a Of S R9 % '1d s
release OF dsehsrre either Of the joint obls.tors
Edwd solomon sst Holt ct al.
Woodruff Jwhen action brosshi upon case IN seaon
ant isi. to set hi. he must sh. the
s e.. s. h made R claim va. not both due and psys
police q the s..sn@en, Qse1s @hsss ;es ~. o. Iss
such attainment claim may be set OF which dd not Ell