New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1854-10-02
COURT or COMMON PLFAs-sProuL TrRN-Befors
JUDGES INGR,HAw. Woodruff and DAILY.
DECISIONS.

f.i5.aadQf opiaioal made BY ae J.d0e. aea'cIs";l
Merchants Bank agsinsi Henry Mills aud WIN !. MeAhur
ISGRAHAN, j., first Judge An omission TO tle
security bv foreign corporation before commencing action
sufficient Cause to Get s'de Judgment obtained BY de-
~ defendant negccns move before Judgment Z to
be deem Cd ~ wbiyng the ngt 70 security Oder mohea
Harmon "a. 0unter appellant. against Simon Rosenbsum
respondent
IScRAH,v, j., FIRST Judge "A fraudulent repre-,
resrrstiop =, paid for the rent Of house. viii
not contract io hiring part Of the premises peeaed
Where vile &. de,gnad by the husband hi. agent in
the Of property during his absence admissions
ud Iromes 70 pay ts N 5csld 20 az premise, are n
~''h'u' ' E,in sLasd against
NoUuTrTT, Jan attorney who assumes to APP
near for rsrty in Justices Court II required prove
o,ev l. himself competent witns prove The proper
time require such proof o. authority upon the appearance.
before oins ssue and going 10 trial Judgment affirmed.
TLcas, p. Wl.on. aprellsp, against Richard J. slater
rssponden
IvGRlHtV Z J.-Whero an assignment OF persou.
PROPERTY - udorgrd upon agreement relating 10 IT, and
referee 10 III por{ a. nIooee snq Described m sss
admirable In evidence, although be-
dcr,d for r''.na tor 4ics S8 With eosi,
joseph W. Trust, appellant ag,nss Isaac C. De!iPiaine.
Ecn,uln, F.J-W6ere an su,tioneer, in selling
personal property bid. for h. and thereby enhances ths Pre-.
d pureba''r tho latter may on discovering such undsrbd
The Cour arpes limited 70 the return 70, tae facts oc
where specially provided by law. Judgment affirmed, With
Frederick A. IIclly agains. Frederick Gosslne
To recover commissions for negotiating loan for
Irdge Woodruff gsye an opinion length. lie held
that defendanf having accepted plaintiffs services not
low that be dd not originally employ hin, and refuse.
syon qf ground 10 mako him Just compensauon' JUG
affirmed. with costs.
Is C. schlesngor plaintiffs and appellants against Isaic
Bushnell dcf, ndant and respondent
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Michael Manning respondent seains william s. Humphreys.
appellant
TyCp " l.. ..-Nherc n person purchAse3 vari-
ou. sre ~ separate prices aud pays f0r them Of tho
articles sent 10 different from that IIrchased he may re-
turn such defective ard recover back the money PAID an1
need ell the other articles purchased st the same
time Judgment ofrmsd. With cost go
William smi'n against Bethel D0dd, et al
WOODBURY., 1.-The papers on which the nouon
,sss made ere not presented 10 the Court " mona
ee n.ed OF The motion made mere verbal saTn1nts
it n.ust have been py cOn''hi' snu n' ePP'" ~ ' ~ ~
Mh.sj F,prinr sssiu., Abm Lent and George Milford
10 recover damages tor injury % wagon Dy stage.
jude Woodruff opinion at some on.a ~ VS. eu1s
d and vet enter up Judgment sghins DOM ne "an poNo.
so fLconluarce he should have rendct.d Judsmsni
against Lent only and IN favor Of Ma0id WIN co-s oeI
49,, ccT.Serink whether appeal the Court has power
-, he iademenf correspond with the ipts9t0o
- a. shown By the return, there no evidence the
C .sfiaed sustain judgment against either defendant
Jud10sns Fs az george Hoysr and William Chapman.
iSGRAHlu, +. IA service Of notice OF appeal on
an sffofusg here party resides Ia the Cit q osehcisnt
pot of rssdence not made ont by an adsv ths me
srv fede In the City - the best Of ms sA0rosso
" here notice % appesl handed attorney who IN
6,red The appellant thal the party resided IN tho City
pfd paee ,hereIpon b. back tho notice and sac
be- you'd 20 and hunt him up, h was held NOT 70 o. s2oS
sse M the attorney The paper should have been et WIN
him Appeal dismissed with ? 10 costs