The daily union., 1854-03-02
The New Hampshire Election and the Nationa
IntelliRencer.

is interesting 10 observe the alacrity with which the
National Intsgenee takes up the reckless trade Of is
new masters the abolition agiiaors OF the North II the
maturity OF It's servude Messrs Chase, Seward, Hale
Co. any degree the promise OF its youth, the
Intelgencer will be without rival in abolition hypoc-
risy. For many weeks past IFS columns have groaned
with speeches, communications, and editorials all es.
pousng with the views taken by abotons,s
OF the questions suggested by the bills for the oganza-
ton Of Nebraska and Kansas pending before Con-
gess. Our readers may remember that Tuesday last
we alluded 10 the coming election in New Hampshire,
and said
"The annual election in New Hampshire for governor,
railroad commissioner, State and Representatives
weeks from day. There many considera-
lions which conspire give IL unusual portance Upon
the legislature be chosen viii deyolve the election Of
United States senaorsa fact Of itself sufficient impart
extraordinary the This together with
the other fact that the ssue presented by the territorial bill
for the organization OF the Territories Of Kansas Ne
brsska, now pending before Congress, has been freely
promptly, and boldly accepted by tue democracy Of New
Hampshire, and adopted by its democratic press has cor
daily united the wings, the abotonisis the free-soers
the Maineaw and all the other deluded and anati-
cal elements Of the State in opposition 10 democracy"
The Inteigenor Of yesterday quotes ha, portion OF
remarks and ,hereupon inerposes the following:
The democracy has done no snch thing, but seem 10
take pleasure in rejecting THAT issue"
To subs,anste lis allegation it quotes asfollows from
the New Hampshire Patriot Of the 22d inst;
!" The abolition organ with its usual mendaeity says
the Patriot pocaims the Nebraska question 10 be rHE
issue in election deliberate lie never was Ut
ieredl"
And then, with unexampled eHron,ery, concludes its
article thus:
This Is the fs time in many years. believe,
democracy Of New Hampshire have hesItaed support
af I,,an tF.. ..E..s..
All candid men will once perceive that there is no
contradiction between the language and meaning Of our
own article and ,ha, of the Patriot The democracy Of
New Hampshire have with unanimy quite remarka-
bic, considering the nature OF The question: and the fact
that conventions had been holden authorized TO pro-
the views of the party since the introduction OF
Judge Douglass b accepted" their own The views
and doctrines contained in his bill before The
Senate. The democratic press Of the State has every
where, with but exception, we think adopted the
principles OF uon-inerventios, understood and pro-
claimed BY The friends OF the Nebraska bill.
On the other hand, il is equally true, as the New
Hampshire Patriot suggests that "lhe Nebraska ques-
ton be the in election the italics
are 10 the Patriots article, and copied by the Inte
geneer) is mot TO be THE issue" for many reasons
and chiefly because there has been no way since the
question arose. by which the party could
it issue. There has been no State con-
ven,ion holden since Judge Douglas reported his bill
But while that is true, !, is also true
ist That nearly every democratic paper in the State
has sppropsd and endorsed the b and every whg and
free soil paper has opposed and denounced it,
I'd That meeting against the bill has been called by
democrats OF any standing. while all The meetings in the
State have been originated by wings and free soers ad
dressed by them, and attended by them The follow
ing from the last number Of the New Hampshire Pa
irio will give readers just idea of these sutNe-
braska gatherings;
"we ask readers TO notice who the engaged
in getting up and managing these political revival meet
fngs Let them notice who the speakers. They will
find them sn whg and abolition politiciansnen
invariably found active in tanning every public question