The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-12-27
MosDAY, Dec. 26, 1853,

AO TN uO1xOB OF 1Hu NEW xOkA n1nALDs
MosDAY. Dec. 2o, 1861
SM-Havpg In your yesterday edition pubshsd the
sngthy appeal Of NJ Max Marstssb public sympathy
that In fAssss you vim give equal publicity
few lines In from meter limit myself appealing
70 the justice Of the publi with The dignity Of and
tbs credit Of artist who Tor twenty years has bssa
favorably received BY the public OF both Hemisphere
The little tattls scandal, and personal abuse Of Mr.
Marstzek, again declare that win not eondsss>nd to
notice. leave him to the uneisturbsd enjoyment Of al
those paragraphs.
Respecting the accusation that refused to sns for Mr.
MarstEsk's benefit. That bessat, It was ON Monday
sverDs, tleth) decided, in perfectly amoabIs manner
should b. given the subsequent Wednesday, (2oh) to
which rAnssment Mr. Karetxsk did not adhere whsther
rot becauss the receipts merely pay certain
debts he alone can tell On the evening Of that very
Monday, after he had without my having tho rsmotss
suspicion Of such thing, written for alton In the
Daily Times the letter OF accusation agAinst me, no
used towards sll the outward appearances Of friend
And it further angsd between u.s. (As Imagining,
perhaps, that ahoud not take offence 1t his sttsr)
that Tshould leave New York in company with him, on
together to Tor the purpose Of engaging tue
theatre there for two three weeks returning directly
shsr On m.I
theatre there for four ak weeks commence after
the PHILADELPHIA engssenent should . finished M.
two sIesgements (Which he considered would Be
sdeabs shoula be devoted to qudats the due
to the artists.
Respecting the $500 requested him 10 let me have on
the lsib, asked for that sum account Of heavier
sum which was due to me on the 9th Dec ! distinctly
inform ed him that II he would let the $500
account, AZ wished, he could PhAd-lpha settle
balance ogether with the S6So which would fall due
that day, Q9th There nothing cry harsh In the
propof ition OF mine. Mr. AaIstzek In his appeal de-
clArsd he could have paid me- but did rot choose to
do so.
Respecting tie losses which Mr. Marstzek prstsuds to
have suffered In his operatic management have Z few
words to say.
Upon the principle that cannot lore what he has
not ceny that Mr. MAretzek has been loser. He has
apita in music, 6ressea, DO which he hsd mot
when no began. moreover declare enphstiosliy my
belief that his operato campaign after the payment Of
the charges thsreunto appsrtAniDg have not lett de-
felt.
Were Mr.. Msrstssk really . loser, OF were he In the
habit OF willingly paying his employees when able to do
So then neither d brother artists would be
rigorous in dem ands upon him. Bnt when hs lives
IN style of luxury seldom met with here having Though
In his stable his unpaid artists hsve to be
dtspatit fed and d.strustfal.
When Mr. hsrefzsk has season In which loss oan b.
with senblance Of probability asserted 10 exist
the artists and his creditors to bear the brunt Of It,
while, the other hand, when he has good he
to pocket all the fruits without the
due In 1t surprisins that artists shoud such
c.rcumstanoes prefer entering into mutual engage
msnt profit ard loss with the manager2
HaviDg replied to the ehsrgss preferred against
ready to enter upon the discussion Of tho Hna
cia part Of the question whenever Mr. Marstssk Is
pared. Respectfully yours, LORENZO 5ALvI