Weekly national intelligencer. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1841-1869, 1853-01-22

With eoua truth freedom and the rights of man IN Epro
nean vassalaoe He saws rather svlv that tba ayian
Sue access;ons ,nada n French and Eno;sb dom;non
s.hava crsated no ,,naasnsss I'm tba Un;tad S,ass d
that he With dnlomatc donbt
u ,;,or,, ,rha ealIor;n,, 49,
n "a, nc q ca,sd No ,reas;nes 20 ,he asst ~ pr
@ pawars WelI dona NJ Fvsrett wsi dr.
pean ppJI;, .oaId 40 La nanoaad ma atnrt s;.h Js
n huu'oA =; hns ;, e ; .S -S'S -S'S' "'N-
nunoi, LOT - n'Pp'l an, sean - -.s.o.
-. : - ~ 1890 .;o, ~ a.;as 80. W WI s ,h 49,
sassa. ss sas " ,,rt;, ,at shn;,,d - tbs Tnitsd
pa posuoa ivI .P ~ uasay. hI:as - - I. =. ,a ~
o'alcs Nv IN nsA .ae ys ys.o' .L p 80
a1oep.. ~, 49,. - - I ~: -. - 1 - 80 -1 !, sS.. - -
49,. ny a sad !, - - , ,h, sh o ,a he
. pasy.S. ""; ;.aJ Tn ali as.sd ~ - , ,;o;
P1IenP.oriy Icysoeu M 10y ~ unue issaA ~ ~ p,o
pies Ia anu ~ Il s \. " 49, -
.he .yy a.n a In rasr.. - Gr. a..
aSs S ar.s LEV oan m'n $500. saa snas
h Ja.a 49, sAo''s - ~ t 'A's'SS'' - 80 S1N'
''numo. NM "a. -,
/. 80 L wy -. - ,d -, as W WI, -: - ~ 40.
~ ,~s;o.sl tsh;,. ;nan;rw abcs. go san
{SSE NJ. I'M &Sss IN | m. sSssssss hll
take our uwm cosse sfh rsspsct Is <nfs. Ws H
asked your particpation 10 the measures necessary
It's security and yoa have seclined TO oin u.s. We are
fee to act as we please We have given you warning
thnt we do not recognise your right to ACQUIRE that
that YOU NAV make to obtain possession Of it, This dec
laraton is explicitly made BY the French Government
and the same view is easily deducibs from the letter
of Mr. Crampon wheye he speaks of there being some-
thing eauiyoca in the declaration of the United States
in consequence Of the juxtaposton o the words Eu-
An0 n
our intention ever to obtain possession sf Cnba This,
of course he neither got nor expected to get.
Thus then stands this matter: France and England
have assumed the right to decide upon the destiny of
Cuba and have asked the concurrence Of the United
States in their This has been de-
clined and the two upon their own principles
free regulate the whole subject far they
agree in their nocv If thew cannot do that each Of
them viii probably await the chapter Of accidents pro-
testing or seizng as one or the other may be in the as
cendant-proyided however we sit still and phlanthro-
Nor sir have endeayored to show why these resolu-
tons should pass have endeavored to show both our
right and our duty to adopt them and also that their
adontop vonld have powerfu operation in checking
nroecs Of ACKNOWLEDGEMENT which without our influence
will 20 ON TO their consummatien do not presume to
saw that tb. solemn proceeding alone viii under all cir
cumstance, secure our immunity from these dangers
But do saw it will be heard and not UNDECIDED and pro-
iects which without il would be- and perhaps promptly
carried into effect win be- if not abandoned at least de-
layed till more convenient will
when nns;l,an;miv guides the councils Of our country
and not till then Why then not saw what we mean and
do as we saw Gentlemen opposed to this course while
thew ayow their indisposton to act acknowledge also
that our policy must be enforced by war if necessary
should the effort be made to thwar it and to endanper
our safety
highly estmable member of the House of Represen-
tatiyes for whom have much regard has recently re-
marked that .he was not willing TO sustain the resolu-
t;or - He was opposed 10 serving John Doe and
Richard Roe notice to the world though he aYowed his
determination to act by force If European colonization
maritime nation taking Cuba Then why not say sor
The declaration NAV do good and can do no harm No
American Nr President has the right TO undervalue his
country hy Saving that the ayovn az firm resolution on
her mart to resist an unjust policy deeply affecting us will
he received in Europe with Indifference or lightly regard
ed No. il is not so and without the fear any impu-
tation of selfexaation we may estimate influence by
higher standard than that IT. indeed we do nothing
bv our own differences and discussions to cast suspicion
unon our ultimate course leading the politicians of Eu-
rome 10 believe that when the trial comes the record
containing our words will never be inscribed with our
deeds far better is to do nothing thus prove
creant repeat sir why not saw in good faith what in
of fred course of policy in certain be
foreseen or apprehended are common in
intercourse of nations and therefore be decided
der existing circumstances. Why not John Doe
and Richard Roe notice to the worldi Passing by the
sneer in which join, upon the clumsy contrivances Of
the law, by puerile 6cons to do indirectly what
should be done directly and looking the object and not
any form Of expression though rendered unpaa
able by its associations the serving of that notice pre-
do q wise nation, and what it becomes to do as
frank and republican nation.
Did not our fathers issue John Doe and Richard Roe
notice to world on the 4th Of July 1776 when
sumed place among its independent communities; and
did they then certain great principles fun
damenal articles of political faths And did not the
Emperor also his John Doe
and Richard Roe notice. in the form Of Muscovte de-
cree proclamng Christendom that nations should not
be contrary his pleasure for such is the
meaning of that memorable State paper when dvested Of
its diplomatic redundancy And is not modern history
full Of these declarations less just unjust,
well less grave, down to the blockading Of
port even, which is made known by the same process
So much for these two old pillars Of the common law,
al ortad dinton law