The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-10-29
GUTTA PERCHA.

% sa %S,l... s.,,s
Company published the ilh instant il reply card
in the statement made in that card Tho first
that purchasers stock Of company So, viii
is worked without the Of Goody. ars BY this
aS&, Soodysa4. patented presses ynis.nia.sos
s a a. WAS Tor snt india SssT and
rs sutt psrcha patensed BY
not Goodyears be;.uss he adds
would DO useless in the yuloanaton Of gutta
because he has made addition to, Improvement on,
Goodyear and procured patent for it, he
the 'Sssa
Of a' ri h
INT Rider BY the second Proposition assumes the broad
directly contrary 20 the fact stated in Riders specification
in these Words claim inventor the
curing of caoutchouc India Rubber by subecng it to
the action Of high degree Of artificial heat substantially as
Mr. Rider probably means therefore by statement that
ton that he not Goodysars process is
r yueanpg Cutta Psrcha which first proposition
THAT his % 5 r9% %o seT sss
right Goodyears il chose because Good
peroha ha: the two are not the same or al
led" That they chemically mechanically alike
or his IN We Will s%r
say hfs Dr. Page in an article published by him in sill
Of gutta percha as modification Of caoutchouo and
that yields distllaon similar products to
and Professor Slman in the ourns the chem
cal relations Of gntta pereha almost identical with those
from the accompanying resins by alcohol and ether
and submitted to ANALYSIS it saye according to soaberain
SsrTaday
has % shs
cpon that gutta identical in constitution and
process Of yulesDns this last named might
applied to the treatment Of guta persha We the a
percb are not the same or adensca either chemically
an o
for our purpose that they are anaiog or similar sub
he o.hsr and difference whether oaoa,chouo
IT. so sns sna I'd s int
with some patents have been aksa out for
act that su.ia pereha known time Good.
Of s Il .. sS and e:
Patent .ace 50 decided on this very application Of
. Pis mr. a ss's The sfty th Of
Of sn :'fn IF sss Of
Riter inquiries why don't Goodyear sue tho
sss
its corporate capacity We shall It's officers
tho or s~o weeks
have not hoard the responsible
stockholder in the Company, and now know of but
Of the most responsible Of them.
But all that the Company have done (except what they
have done rs nfringers Goodyears Patent in
India Rubber to perfect the of vucanzed ut
Percha, and to render profitable business which will
require the expenditure Of much time and money it
perfected Gas the with vuoanized India Rubber
ts for Mr. Goodyears bepeht.
the end of about FIVE years the termination Of the
Goodyears title to this property expires aud it will then
belong to the public Mr. Rider at the ond that period
prove his title to tho particular for which
he has patent he will then be entitled to enjoy the exolu
sive benefit OF them till his title expires
But Mr. Goodyear does not mean to render hnsef OBJ
noxous to the charge of having silently stood by and
asserting his rights Mr. Rider cannot certainly
Of Mr. Goodyear silence whatever innocent
with notice do for Rider has profed
make sales Of the stock Of the They
he cannot Their money, much of
in paying for this patent will suppose be expended
defending for infringement But IL it should
decided that what the had done
aware the position which they will then
leave this to their Investigations at least for the
sent At mother time and alotber OCCASION we tell
them shall close th, with single
statement of Mr. Ryders which that all tho stock
that the company desire dispose of R sold The company
seems place higher value the stock than IL has been
or c be sold for This have no doubt Will DO gaaify
Ing intelligence TO the Of the stock and the
company viii not be regardless Of It's interests ~ not
purchase the stock such stockholders as may be viii
ling TO part with their shares FOR e than they gave for
them, and much less than their actual value
WILLIAM JUDSON, Attorney for Charles Goodyear.