New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-02-25

70 zach serce made by delivering yo1s csoy and AZ
t s-qe tine SLOWING 70 you tle slid Original isaHesJa
g. Were you present. At meeting o. tie Board Of Alisr.
th zsfh CAV o. deem her l35 maiJrty o.
al tne nemlsI. eeied TO said ard appeared AMI passed
CERTAIN r=so OF Grznt tOf .hch copy h-r-al-o
t2ntx nsfd - NJ the o6oetlon thsre.o
DID y U not ser III service Of sad iaizsctoa o-i.r
On VOC, ard a. such nE t1ssther With Orty o. all
tie ueInbes elected ~ said Beard OF Adsrn vote "a
yoT or and GSt IL the adoption ap rova and passage OF
SAD ressEioc. or Esit, G1sEthtandng tue ob-ctions
thereto OF The Mayor. and n1w hst-nng sad nj
s. Wa not ali grant resolution Of Dee q 1872
ytss and approved by sid Board Of Al1srmeu IL
stencipg ssid objection OF tae MAyOri
The answer of - % the inte-rogstor.es sled
sgsin-t him in this proceeding,
Ffi-To the frs, irterrOgasory he saith, that be
dGr1ns the last and ! Alderman o: tie CltT OF
New-I ort. for the = Ward.
SeoonG-He admits the service and in the u1aa--
ouitd Of; sueh Yas made the Cal5er OF the
Bosid Of Aldermen 81 t5eIr evening Session blt no Spy
Of any OF Of Any a9syItw served on him.
O. shown % LIN or seen By him.
ThiJd-To the third isterrogaiOry. be saith be v,A
F0uyhTO the fourth interr0z story, he saih Tht on
,;S - " I1s - .- -. -.
uehtd sno after me servee o. the M Junction . aooss
admitted Of tie Members of the B0Ia OF Aisrnen
Common Council mentioned IN TIE int-rrog l:oy the . ne
having BEEN returned y The Mayor With this ob-efio a.
That thereUpOn the President OF the Board declared ths
question TO be reeoLsderng and passing said resotoa
notwthssnciDg the objections Of tie Mayor. an or
eer,d the question 20 Re TAKEN By sye aad noes aud
directed the CLERK 20 cal the o ad tberoup01 The Clerk
called the roll Of members, and the Of his respon-
dent was called be did in the eormance Of ais alive
tnd public duties - nenber Of saa Board vote ay upon
sad resolution according to his indx and conscience
and that u tie only art done BY him relation -
the said resolution after the Issuing OF said injunction.
That he did then believe that tie sud injunction did not
purpot and did not mean to restrain bm from voting IA
favor OF the said resoutiuDhaf a. such mecng mao
nfy Of ell the members eeced to said Board OF Adsrmen
did vote in favor OF sale resolution.
FDn-TO the fifth ineuOgstory, be saith: That he Ell
cepts 10 lie sane and to al the Allegations relating 70 the
prexed the and in.is that
Be Il not bound to make any answer t1eTeo and that they
should b exIunged.
And this resTondent doth now deny an protest asn,;
the jurisdiction Of this Cot issue the liIncon. 70
peyeIt his voting in the discharge Of his alive euty or
10 call him account og upon the said resolution
And IN answering these iperIosaoe be does no! wave
any exceptions to the jurisdiction Of the Court bat denes
that he be held Herb to this Court for any vote or
act mentioned IL these answers
The answer OF the Assistant Alderman IL the same az
to the fret second and third nterrogatores, AMI the
protest the close The fourth and eth differ little.
as follows:
FotYfb-To TIE fourth nterrosa,ory he saith That
the seth day Of December last the meeting last
toned and after the OF the injunction above &
red he President of the Board in the ordinary iad usual
Of proceedings stated that the resolution inquired OF
had been passed by the Board Of dermen not~hs',ni
ing objections Of the Mayor and hreupon declare the
question to be reconsdeng and passing sad resollton
nOtwhsan ding the objeetors Of TIE Mayor and ordered
the question 20 be aiken by ayes and and directed tho
Clerk 70 call the rolls and theeupon the CLERK called the
roll OF members aud as the name OF thus respondent was
called he did in the performance Of hs legislative and pub
lie duties member Of said Board vote aid re-
solution according 20 his Judgment and and that
this was the only at done By him in relation the said
solution after the issuing Of the said injunction That he
did then believe and advised BY counsel that the
said injunction did puport aud did not 10 restrain
him from voting favor the said resolution that AZ sneh
meeting majority Of ell the members elected 70 said Board
Of Assistant Aldermen did vote in favor OF said resolution
F1h-To the fifth inteuosatory he saith lie doss not
know.
The protest as given above wac appended to the
swers OF the Assistant.