New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-02-18
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPREME COURT SrscIAL rssM.
Before judge ROOSEVELT.

SUPREME COURT srscAL rssM
Before JEdse ROOSEVELT.
DECISIONS.
William V. Curtis sgt Edwin B. ssr'nse and Abbott b.
Strange.
There having been an express agreement IN
tieles of eoparnershp that on dissolution the effects
should possession of Msss s. and they wind up,
It pot pe,ent Tor the Court to appoint receiver UNI
tended former the allegation little than
whether certain should be inserted struck out Of
MED but Il plaintiff wishes security his share Of III,
sets, the order may he made to that effect
Caroline Dunbar AT John H. Dunbar
Before Judge MosRls
Chas. Wetmore ast John Mott
Mr. LAmher,son being no longer Mr. Ms attorney, no
tee should have been giveu 10 Mr. Mott, and the motion
rrst be denied do not believe even should the cause
he oo,neS that plsint could recover on the complaint
The husband be made hsbs for the costs OF the wis
except by oer OF tte Court or BY an sSpcss promise
SUPERIOR COURT-Before Judge OAxLgv
Mary Caughlip against Peter b. Amofy.
To recover damages for alleged false impris-
giving plaintiff into custody ofa policeman the
allegation defense being that she was causing the stono
wall belonging to the premises which she h,d hired from
Defendants mother to be bTostn up and soh already
fered II eontended the part OF plaintiff that
beng IN possession defendant had no rsht TO esass nsr
any had been committed by another mode Verdict for
plaintiff SEQ BY the law OF 1884, il % made felony TO 70.
move earth stones. any other article, from property
whether occupied or Otherwise unless BY permission Of
ownersrp party IN Ioseslont W., u..,..
To Slco tine amount OF note The note, ap-
pears los Mrs b. tes,ifyns chat 10 was IN purse
which she accidentally left table In her OF the
house where she boarded and in GONG back Tor y IN about
half an hour she having been out erand) discovered
that u was gone Her door locked but there were
keys belonging TO other doors which fitted t may have
been tskt before she opt she having et her room
for a fsw minutes aud tho door unlocked. Bcades the
there eonsids rabls money ia the Verdict
for plaintiff aud interest she TO give the security
defendant mot to DO called upon again for the motel
asreeably to statute.
To recover s.0 the amount OF nose, the defense To
which that the does not belong plaintiff but 10
John Bort the payee against whom Mr. ~ has gooa
defenfe.-veIdiet for defendant.
EmIa Dupgnae by her guardian AT Robert BrochelbAnk
aud Emma, his wife. .
Plaintiff is little girl about 10 years OF She and
her family lived the house with defendants ct York
vile. Tie action assaults and battery committed upon
her by Mrs the little sn II ssd havins been seat o.
erIand and 10 the front door and rang the BELL
when Mrs b. the door and told her she must 70 into
the gate as she had previously told her do The child
piled that her mother had forbidden her to do but told
her to come in at the ftoni door Mrs would not permit
her 10 do and shut the door The Little girl again
when MTs. b. IL alleged, AGAIN opened H. permitted tho
child to in step two when aha struck hsr violent
yet fully recovered and pushed her again out Of tho door
ss,er OF painh twho was standing at tho head OF the
stairs her family occupying the uppos part OF tie housed
testified the above Ia defense denied that Mrs
H. struck plaintiff stated and testimony produced 10
show that she thTse four days Afterwards and
appeared TO be perfectly we'll twas a sverred that the
family noisy and Troublesome, Of them ssmm!ng
the door when they came in, &C. (which dsned and
that Mrs b. had that day gwen uem aotce 10 quit The
parties In Court and seemed 20 be- both 10 plaintiff
ard defendants mild appearing people Verdict for plain
tf, $40 aud coats