The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-11-05
GUTrA PERCHA.


MANUFACTURERS OF vULcANIzED GUrrA PER
Is Sa ss sa
he discusses and only one because he does nc
naSs rssa both as
pos w ihnsns 'Es ass
ss essSe aIf g or rs!en.
qualification sake the arsaeps aamisss
n.ns good deal considering Dr. Page treats Of quit
san % u ssss
almost Identical with Of eaoutohoucn That the ana
ss sss
me NOS eou I yn srsa f
themselves have always erred to then
states tley have previous lis word
There has been an shat suta
last material might be applied to the sreasnens o
Nct andng this proceeded the admission q
same or Identical and laid down the following propositions
which Mr. Rider has not even attempted to answer and cor
r That Rider uses Goodyears patented process Of
That er something to
years patented process in vuloanng gut
ag Trra right TO use ,GGodye ars process;
as to the great dsmay in constitution and character
tween the two Mr. Rider and the
aS a. pnser @ that ssy are
eded this very point the application Of Rider for this
first proposition stands uncontradcted and we sha
mott therefore, retae the proofs by which established
viii iis But %T Legal
denied because Mr. Rider says rubber and gutta
thing principle aaeip ass5hsd
a9 s IN this very an
india rubber to use the Same in vulcansng quit
Mr. Rider does mot deny that the Commissioner of Paen
he 10
would be use the words of them
ns sH'e n e Ind
n il ssi % to
they need not be the identical and such undou
Mr. Rider ntunates that he shall dispute the validity
Coz dyesIs patent
chemists questions Of law before legal tribunal may
for the newspapsrs. but hardly for the court
not quite clear then, that Mr. Rider willing
really the Of IT. and perhaps he
that he himself but of the fact that
which all Of them hat Goodyear was the inventor
that me- Rider Will noS to or a.seps
prove the Of what he has swo
DO And if reminding him Of this which he had prof.
Ply orgoiten when he made his threat has saved him E
But what hatterng prospect does Mr. Rider hold out
the stockholders of his company
sss Of % M ~ which has
which has been carried with energy and
lis
Mr. Rider means to expspt the money Of his st0
pirate to himself for his patent. NV Afp
:ass SSsy u RI
xs l.
htissiion with GeodyeaT mors sensible g Z
eating patent. and of will be absorbed
But DO the ssoeEhoider. Of Mr. Riders company KIN
what John Rider claims to be his inventons
they tnow whether John Rider in his apple alton
procured patent for entirely different thing '
Ties: s1s .E asss s'f
design offers for sale tights o mauuaot
under RIDERS patent and guarantees their enjoyment aga
Now there three objections to this guarantee assum
The hst is that Rider does not s eu purob.
agains. recovery Of damages by Goodyear against
The second is, that Mr. Rider does not agree to pay
The that Riders patent q "aasy os 9s
and that as good an article be made nrng
this last objection will be the subject another commu
regard to the responsibility Of the stockholders in
Enema sssm hsy MAXI no.s and no
org and expensive lii .tion which Mr. Ri prspar
them and for which they personally and ,di
published. Why not If there truth in our
foundation for charges and the publ are satis
with Mr. iders deesce, the publication their names
not iDure their credit But there any truth Sta
ments and the public bell charges have been prov
ten Their credit, we admit, will be i'm paired; aud
Rider keeps the stockholders Of his company In his web
long as he nsnuates he SHALL slthough they NAV keen
making notes, time will como wh.n they will sto psy
them. " - -
Fer who does mot that they are miserable dunes
Rider for the privilege Of disputng the validity Of DO
years patet at their expense Who does not see In
while Mr. Rider is benefited by sales Of this stock in
event Of the stock in any oi
Lose Goodyesrs patent is ayed because the eb
better business than their will be thrown open to
public (snd il yet be proved that there is any
the manufacture of vulcanizsd gutta percha os ift
should succeed in their claim . right to use Goodyea
process For then the public will have the right TO manu
ture gutts percha and all that paid
litigation. "
DO they this II be that these
ers induced to purchase the under the belief
Rider had patent for the exclusive right vulcan
gutta percbal
Has Mr. Rider made any such representation If he
then they back the money they have
for the stock for the Patent refused to grant John
der patent for canized gutta percha they refu
others Ions before When Goodyears patent ia out Of
way, anybody and everybody can make vulcanized GU
If the stockholders in Mr. Riders company ever had the
that as good vulcanzed gutts percha DO made
not be made without interfering with Riders patent
sooner they make the investigation the better
as>Re ell as their purses. WILLIAM JUDSON,
Attorney for Charles Goodyear
TRAvRLLERs' GUIDE.