New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-04-27

She accordingly arrived here in the early plr Of La. o
er stated defendants deserton Of her. and asked and oh
Ahed the pr election Of her uncle The unce aro5 q,
ne authon ties and proceedings taken T. compel de-
endan to support the child and prevent IL becoming
burden on the City Defendant subsequently, came To the
Cy and WIS arrested by the authorities and required 70
enter INTO surenes for the maintenance ofthe child PA
u SEM 10 me uncle MIR Tucker power Of attorney au-
horzne him TO institute the present suit and was
accordingly.
CoroitNe r. Thomas, sworn-Is daughter Of plaintiff
knows Joseph McBarron he Is present first became ac-
quainted with him two years ago in Posyls he visited
me sutton have child it IS little boy he was born
in this City in June last Joseph McBarron father Of il
witness now between Il and 70 years Of age lived with
my father at the time | became encente
Cross ined-I first met him at Mr. Murphys don't
recolect that the first time ever spoke hun in
street III company with another young and saying to
the other young and take my brother and
that Joseph would take of me- don't remember hay
ing met him al gate late hour night and asking
him 10 90 in during the first four months Of acquant-
with him previous to that resided at my sister
Mnersyle about five miles from Pottsvile attended the
shop for my sister left ny sister the spring and returned
TO my fathers
The for plaintiff here rested
Mr.. White then opened the case for defense He said
that defendant is Young man under age. There no
promise OF marriage between him and the young LADY
Difficulty, oOubt, occurred between them POttsve
and the ingenuity of her friends has cOnrved
this suit from Posvie, where the parties known TO
this place If the friends Of the lady had consulted their
respecabty they would not have brought this mat
ter into court and compel the friends defendant to make
expose which they had desire 10 make 1heythOught
they had settled the with plaintiff at Pott5yile hay
iny made him offer pay all the costs which have been
incurred but the friends Of Miss T. have forced the
hoping get damages from person other but
certainly from defendant who has nothing and the de
tense driven to show circumstances calculated to throw
deep dscredt upon Miss T. and that there seduc
ton in the case the advances not made by him
The testimony of some witnesses at Philadelphia and
other places in Pennsylvania, taken by commission, was
read In relation to the conduct of Miss L. 1t appeared,
however that the statements were based upon her
sions They were objected and ruled the COur:
would not allow her declarations the suit being not
her own behalf but that of her father The Court said
would allow testimony of general char tcter The counsel
excepted.
The testimony of James McBaon, brother of defendant
was then read by Mr.. w Witness knew Miss T. since the
year was invited by her occasion to go to her
room and did So and remained there till l. o'clock she
blew ont the light and and sat down; her mother
came into the room and insisted that the lamp should be lit
again; after her mother she put the lamp under
table and said it strange her mother watched
her so close that night that when Henry Meyers called TO
see her he always put the and her mother OBJ
eced met her one occasion at the gate OF her father
house in Potsvle; asked her why She was not in the
house she said her sister within and that she and her
sister could never agree they went into the country, and
she sat with him till ~ o'clock at night among the bushes
her general character for chastity Is not good.
The witness in his examination As well as beng
brother of the defendant wedged being his attorney
in hunting up witnesses ut POtsvilc.
Some Other testimony then offered but objected TO- az
before and ruled out as being the declarations of Miss
Il Some other little testimony, Of but slight moment was
given and the case for defense rested.
Plaintiff counsel then read rebutng testimony, in favor
of the character Of Miss l. Ii consisted of testimony OF
Mrs Evans, Rev. Mr. Lowering, Baptist minister the
brotherin law and sister nlaw Of Miss l.. and Others
They all testified that the general character of Miss
good before the difficulty with defendant Adjourned to
this forenoon.