New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-06-27

ants ., keen their trains out Of the way some,hngto
ffst effect until these MATER settled a. poned out ny
lie defendants charter II clear that the conptnants
Eihoui sny fafe snc soeq nsi" remedy N ths PF 1N
less Il T. done the care before oy ioiunftlon
Tie IN 10 LDglgh ch. T. 49s Deere w. tues! J.,
cred ce-e IN point sRsinf gfaning nls mum non
d. 40 fhrl 80 last ers from thu n s-vrrt nv
tsra respects First The plaintiff hire sss mortgages
Who Was oui II possession a. The iime Of hhng hs o
S.eordly The tenant possession gave the defendanis
p4r.r iof 70 DO the acts complained 4 Thirdly Ia. de-
fndsnfs lla1ed right u possession from the morgagor
or reyisi0nsr FOurhly Deietdnis we're nof corpora
lion A. ing 10 sIogsf1n 81 n. corporate DoTsrs ven ~
sfatute Ii.:hy, de bas, the Court -aid compsie
fsuscv a. law Car Il be- true that mis- = -uch cse t1t
CouI Of law il able % do c'mpeie justice 70 ne pEI5'
AIS aG0fd tie complainant ssi-, Ger AIM 'nfrnt ale
& afe rgrnecs VII acton On the czs@ - 'pt-s con
tei Il doisncalis % TIA me complainant. aooa,
The mobt Of con p-Iston 70 o. made ana the lh ma
ukrH.r he defendants snail cr9s TIE complain +t 'oH
end WHISTLER shel be- ~ bridge Or ~. and by Dnigs
how shall Il - corstrnctedl vi either o. tess lions
o0npd The defendants 20 submit these qle ~ 10 ths
confederation d THEE commissioners a. prs-rb ~ AZ
II l. enough 10 state these questions without giving any
aLsweT fbereO. o. 81 The uit mt5ify ~ C"ti i
lev 70 sdut.sier q pr"2r Te9t ~ = - 'Aae in'DnS
sbCud h. done ard promptly t. sste Tho WHO'S dhc1ty
between The rars ia prder 70 serve r Or ect each
Of fbe yslfes the e ymeat u TER respective rights
and frnob.se and Afford some security 20 iie hn0 aud
proptriy to ibOis Who travel upon t6rss Iotds.
AN bOUld, i1tce 20 ihf complainant tu1 - ne pi0-
lie 10 give sfe Z the lsw which toe defend laS nave
r. o. sft 81 dff ince, nor ~ do 50 rganousy 50
to Dtsriie NTH IT, ~ gress # detsndants "3r@s or
rerf issues and profits nes they compel ne 70 d. 80 ~
by their conducin Ia premises Bat ~ take car
70 10 myself tie power Of dong So 10 Of1T tli'
insiice msy be done The Law prescroes the mode Of qe
term ming the matters in dispute where ms parties ctnnit
agree and advise prompt aud e'bcient act"A ID in5
msitr II this rot properly attended o snail On appI
cation Of complainant notice b. the defendant unie1
on sdav Of refusal and negligence direct The WIN o. IA
iun ~ be issued according 20 the prayer u me on
TIL then b all shaU bold tie Gaze over r iurPef cDsn
ate H. with ave or either rty to "frr farler proc" IN
The sttor if oey blink proper wiz iaks ms pe3 ,oI
a. "a hit 10 i o. liberty to wihOl rbs ju1-dct on
q Keep CUTpOrae UDQfS "tLu Liti
legitimate powers or from Outs'nppng the liF Defaas
greet their powers necessarily are 70 e"Aple nsm -
earry into eject tie great objects Of the Incorporation Do
do 90 beyond tie power given by laF and 10 mistaken
ex,ercise Of pos Wildly interfere JuuousJ WIN me
fhe property Of oLerr fsel oound %h'n gI'ed Upon
vopey 10 restrain them Bat mu-t 81 course ~ case
clearly gin the jurisdiction Of tue court OF equity ana
Tat sUcl company exceeding iis powers inunoasy or
lie Jssndsnts collectors having produced 20 ne the
stiuuisors hsreto annexed which being satisfactory the
motion Tor ID nj notion IS taken under a1vsemsnt.
COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Eo,bsn Iodsua Cbcago Railroad Company g. Illinois Cen
III RaiIosd Compauy-n Chaaceg. .
TIE motion for Injunction 10 the above entitled cause
having been aaIdby Hon b. 5 Morris Judge - me o5y-
9TH Judicial circuit at the suggestion OF the uft me
oceediog in said cause are suspended unit the uTher
er Of said Judge, upon the defendants eeung lnO Ie
81 T6at sad defendants will forthwith aud without uune
off-ay delay take all such lawful proceedings As may De
necessary ascertain the compensation 10 b. male U 'td
cor psinsn and tte points and ira nfrn wnch sa1 oe
fndants shall ne aoWtd 70 cross the track ~ me saii
cor painans ~ tle point named Ia me bI Of ComPH"
btd herein IN pu of scchDn eleven OF The ACT m
cooperating sao orrd0uis and wt1out delay prosecute
tucb proceedings final conclusion according % me pro-
visitors % said and that upon Tie de'ermn ipn OF me
commissioners ite sid dfrdauis ali FIR n~t and WITH
out unnfcessAry delay comply win any law ul DECISION
AID award of sac o. un.' ssiOn.ri.
cd Thsi until such 6La determination, or the further
order of said Jutg trains If cars passing boa ways upon
The road Of tie sd defendant shall keep ou oi me way NJ
trsirs passing Lpon The No.,nen Indiana ami Chicago
Rain adj ~ the Or mentioned "a e bill so iat tue
t,aiuf passing up'a le Northern Indiana and Cmesgo
Railroad shall II - times have the road ana tie Pr'ce.
dens in crossing which is to be exercised without any m
rasenabe cela, and that each train pas.ins upon the Hi
moi Ctura Road shall come 10 io stop a. sad crossing
and sepd the cuuGu fireman ou the track 80 as 10
ace fat tie same cear before proce siding. This resuA
n 10 Be m force and after the 25th day OF june d.
1853.
All of nIich 50 defendants hereby sdpua,s 10 do and
n1lo1n Dated 'hi, 18th day of june. \. l-.j
NJ BRfYgAN Solicitor Illinois Central Railroad Co.
BLacKwILL BEtKWiTH Of Counsel