The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1853-02-09

ton in which there is OF self. SELF, SELF | am
the man! did az is the burden OF Mr.. Sanders's
theme
" Who killed Cock Robin
Twas |, said the Sparrow.
With my bow and arrow,
killed Cock Robin"
This production has not about II that which
makes the leaders OF the Review endurabewe It's
sashing wild. crazy mad eccenirices; for one likes to
read such productions, if it only for the novelty Of the
thing
We pleased to know that the Review does not
represent the ihousandh part OF the democratic party
In our large circle OF acquaintance have yet to come
across the first man. no, only of the democratic party,
but oil any party that approves OF the course OF this
publication Its articles agraran, politically lmmor-
all and disoIganlzng Their chief object appears to be TO
uproot the old landmarks OF the democratic party which
experience and sound tell its safe guides
the road of success and prosperity to lay the shelf
the sage counselors who have for years spoke words
OF truth and wisdom, whose patriotic hearts have al
ways been in the right place, and throbbed ever IN uni
son with judicious progress and felt with the people,
and up in their stead new uniried rash men, who,
in carrying out their foolish ideas OF goaheaditveness
would soon involve us in war with friendly nations,
or bring about widespread ruin, desolatng our fair
fields and beautiful cities, making true the predictions OF
the enemies of republican institutions, who said
that the republic of America was experiment, which
time would show to be an extreme folly"
The Review has not only attacked and endeavored to
bring down to its level the best OF the party, but
it has also grossly assaed the religious creed of great
body OF the rank and file of the democracy thus showing
the ncapacy OF its conductors. by their lack OF true
policy, TO control the pages OF The organ Of any party
cept The mad mouth-pece OF some unatc asylum.
Such work that of Mr.. Sanders cannot exist in the
estimation OF democratic organ. 1t is not
and can never be- at present conducted acceptable 10
1.-THE OF the party,
From the Richmond Enquirer of yesterday.
The MILK OF THE CoCoA-KUT."--The last number OF
the mlscalled Democratic Review" in its wild foray
only fires its scattering shot at Senator Mason and
other es,imable prominent, of the democracy, but
makes most furious onslaught upon the work on
Austria, published by VIM H. Stiles, esq., of Georgia,
the late able minister to that country and brother Of the
Rev Mr. Stiles few years since the eloquent and pop
ular Presbyterian minister in this city. Mr. Stiles is
openly denounced old fogy, as playing sycophant
10 royalty running with the hare and holding the
hounds, as misepresentlng facts and numbering the
Kings English. Every crime known 10 authorship
or diplomacy is charged upon him, in terms neither
the most delicate nor expressive. The Savannah Cour.
Ter crilcises this article evidently illiberal and
unjust" The intention OF the author is patent upon
face of the paper, and it is bn act of justice 10
expose the true motives Of the writer This arti-
Gle develops part of the history of the late Democratic
Convention al Baltimore, which ought TO be placed plain
y before the honest Of all parties We have moi
received the facts directly from Mr. Stiles, but stand
ready to subsantaie the following statements. They
explain the character OF the article, and the motives OF
the writer. Mr. Stiles of the Baltimore Demo
cratic Convention, in nominating the candidate OF the
party for the presidency. 1t will be remembered tina,
both wings OF the democratic party OF Georgia had dele
gates in ha, body viz the Union democrats, number.
ing II, and the southern rights. numbering 90 II 20
happened that of the southern rghts-pay there were
II who had expressed themselves favorable to Judge
Douglas their choice, with determination to support
his nomination. Mr. Stiles (who was OF the southern.
rights wing of the pary) was in favor of Mr.. Buchanan
as the nominee. The Union democrats were altogether
in favor of Mr. Buchanan. MIR. Stiles and two others
therefore, held the vote in their hands. 1t during
this period that the editor of the Democratic Review I'M
Outstanding the position OF the Georgia delegation APP
preached MI Stiles, and in the presence OF Major Lay
and Mr.. +. Doyle, of Washington, told Mr. Stiles that
he had written and published his work on Austria
that it Stiles would go for Douglas he would give
ii such favorable notice and criticism as would in
its entire but that if he persisted in the
support OF Buchanan, he would give him such skin
ming tina, would damn his work forever Mr. Stiles re-
piled to him by asking the prize his kinni.g which he
would freely pay, being satisfied that this sknnng would
do his book good than harm" This is the prom.
ised SHINING, and it is nice commentary upon the char
acter of the Review.
is proper that should add that we BY no mean.
design to be regarded endorsing the idea that the Dem
ocrac Review is the organ or exponent OF Senator Doug
las We have too much respect for the talents of tina
gentleman TO believe that he would thus peril his pot
ica fortunes by placing them in the keeping OF such
fanatic and rebrand whose support fatal TO any caus,
that it advocates.