The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-11-16
Marine Court.
Before Hi. Honor Juc w Ms earthly

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
Nov. i5-Henry Ecr@n rs. John c. Ofsrnan.-This
was suit br lught by plaintiff, assgnor of Iaman
to recover note made by deen liant 1872 Defendant
pleaded the statute Of limitations Plaintiff claimed that
payment OF So made the note about year sgo
which took the out of the statute. t. assgnor
was sworn and testified to the payment which he en-
dorssd on The note The defendant was then called .ad
contradiced the first witness, alleging that the IS had
no Inference to the note. fgmens for defendant.
AcMohon and Witew Foulhss and Wife This was an
action tor assault and battery she parties lived in the
same house, and the females related few weeks
ago. after const cradle family arrlDg Defendants It L.
alleged, assaulted and bes The plaintiffs WIFE, who 10
their ne;e The parties fruit nders each keeping
apple stands the Battery. The Judge considered
both parties to blame but considered that some unneoes
sary force was used against plaintiff and rendered judg
ment Of 81 to he the wounds.
IMPORTANT TO CONsTABLEs AND OFFICERS.
Watts rs. Clacldnd-rhls q suit by a constable
against warehouse man fer defeating levy, and tho
facts the trial that the 10th of Sep
TEN Der last Watts such constable had execution
from tie Marine Curt In favor of Bsrnheimsr Bros
against Mr. Weiss. Plaintiff to defendants ware
house. inquired whether they had any goods there be-
longing to Weiss to the amount of the execution, and
was answered in the affirmative, and Mr. c. being in
formed Of the execution said that he would keep the
goods for the officer unless Weiss him. Plain.
till made mxmors ndum his execution that he had
evie on Weisss interest ia the goods In defendants
store. Another party who claimed the soods indsmni
b bsn .h gave up to HIM the
having distinctly informed plaintiff that he would give
up the goods to ei,s II Unidentified, ASTON could bel
maintained against him. and rendered judgment for
defendant
McGocan rs. Coyle.-This action for trsspass.
The plaintiff alleges that he In the quiet possession
of certain premises in Twenty eighth street. the 9th
Of September last that the defendant IL the OF
said prem es and uuaWfully let and rented the sas
premises to another party who entered into and kept
possession hence this acti for damages On motion o
defendants counsel II Judge nonsuied the plaintiff on
the ground that action could maintained against
the landlord by the original for his letting
The action should be against he party who evicted him.
the evidence did not convict with act going
TO shov that he participated in the eviction.
RCgdlinO Scott and P7rr-Ths action was brought te
$500 damages from defendants for driving over
plaintiffs chile last September with cracker wagon. It
app ared in evi ience that the wagon which driver
over the child, had rame psnten the sides and
der 1t the words From Scott " PARIS Bakery, Mot
street" but that the wagon did not belong to them
had they any ntrol the same, of the horse
driver. Verdict for defendants.
Windnts TnderhiN This o suit to thu
value OF 200 loads of sent Dr. Underhi at Gro
ton Point some, two years ago The suit is contested
he ground that much ess quantity received thar
harged. Judgment for plaintiff, $1l6.
Court CaIendar--T Day.
uxrD SfArrs DnnKIm CouRr--Nos ~ to IT,
euPRnK C0uRT-Urcut.-Nos 81, 420, A78, 484, A8e
467, 400, AL, Ss2, 4S2 48q, 49l to 494.
SUPREME COuRT-Spedal Tsrm-Nos. 10, 1874, IA, As
90, 1873. l43
SUPERIOR Couar--Two Branches Mos 1Oa, 325 40e f
66T 483 81s 103, 148 49, IA, 2S, g. 222 2s8 asa 2
6O7 b13 90 100 lOl 102 $40 b44 6i8 $40 $50 554 $50
20, a96, 2,t 43s, 4s1 $50. 2o3, $685. 70, 81, 90, g.