The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1853-05-28

Ans Yes. alone at first afterwards be had part
ner by the name OF Segur. asa#
]" The CoArt How long afterwards q. ..I|E.
ANS. About year. suppose. don't know precise
"Mr Carlisle About year after you first knew
him'
The District Attorney. How long did he continue
Ans lie continued with Segur another year, which
makes the two years that knew Dr. Gardiner +s8E +"
ons. Stale to The jury what were his circumstances
"Mr, Bradley. State whether you had any personal
knowledge oi his means circumstances not what
I" The District Attorney. State his manner Of living
/" Mr, Bradley. lobject TO that.
"The Court. State what were his means.
Wines. The kno Wedge of his that had
was oil his being young with than he
could make BY his profession
Lieutenant Rowan, Of the United States navy. had
conversation with the defendant at Mazatlan "n the
Spring of 1916, in the month of May or June"
"Ques Do you remember any OF his conversation /?
Aus Nothing that distinctly recolleet, except that
be remarked 10 me that he exploring the country
search OF mines, That is what understood him to say
that he had something 10 do with mines"
80 Mr. losnos testimony is strictly concurrent with
That OF the other Witnesses that the defendants means
and style OF living those OF person practising dem
nsry Ia The year 1916, two years afterwards, we End
going, and when he told Lieut. Rowan thai he was eek
plorng the country in search of mines" This man. who
represents himself in the memorial having been en-
gagged in most extensive mining operations at Lagunilas
from the 2lh OF July, 1871, until the gath OF October,
1916, the lime when he said he was expelled by the Mex
ican authorities, tells Lieutenant Rowan in May June,
1916, not that he OF mines, and the
ducior OF great mining establishment, but that be
a seeker after mines. | stating the evidence OF
his means at the time he said he began his mining opera
tons Lagunas. Under lhe next head, shall show
you that he afterwards continued bis practice OF dentistry
at Guanajuao and Guadalaara II Isl then, clear from
the evidence that from the time when he entered the
public Of Mexico unit! The lime Of his pretended invest.
ment of thee hundred and thirty thousand three hundred
and ninety Two dollars in mines at Lagunlas, he was
Dentist and nothing else. There Is not particle OF evi-
dence that there was any source OF gain 10 him. except
the practice OF dentistry and the Morela experiment,
which miscarried There evidence that before the
year 1877 he acted physician al ALL except that Gen
Thompson says, in one two instances he admlns-
le-ed to me-" General Thompson arrived in Mexico,
minister from the United States on abou, the l6 of
April 1872 and remained IN the cty of Mexico till about
The 10Th of March, 1914. On the 25h OF April, 1912,
Gen. Thompson invited TO public dinner by a com
committee the defendant was chairman. and alter wards
became well acquainted with him. The following is part
OF the testimony of this witness;
"Mr, Carlisle. VIII you state whether DR.. Gardiner, al
any time, and when he called upon the American legation
there in relation his departure from Mexico. made any
application il so what that application was, its date and
"Witness. DR. Gardiner applied TO for letter.
don't remember the particular commander; !; think il was
TO any commander or officer OF an American ship there
directing him 10 give him passage directed Mr. Green
10 write letter, which he did, and gave TO Dr. Car
diner, which thing frequently did, AT Vera Cruz
sent home five or six persons, who were men OF
to the scarcity OF ships.
.'Ques Was ii an application for charity aid ?
''Ans. Not al all; IL simply letter OF introduce
ton 10 an American naval officer.
''Ques. Is this fact fixed upon your memory in any
way DO you recoeci any circumstance with regard TO
the framing OF the letter.
"Ans. | cannot say that | DO
"Ques. Do you Tecollect any corrections OF the
letter.
Ans There is an impression on my mind about some
alteration bnt j, is too indefinite for TO state. II
would be loo uncertain lor The court 10 act upon.
"Ques That was in the fall Of 1892
Ans. That was, the best OF my recollection, in
the autumn OF 1913. left there in March, 1871 never
DR.. Gardiner after he called for the letter, aud
passed every day--hree or four times day-by the
house occupied lie lived 10 the with me-
should say With regard 10 the streets in Mexico.
there is peculiarly Every square has name Penn
sylvania avenue, for rsance, would have sixteen
"Ques Understood that he took leave of you; that
he took this letter with the apparent intention oil going
away
Ans LIDO not remember ,ha, he did; bu, il was my
impression that he was gong Immediately. isaw hlm no
more.
"Ques State when you next saw him
"Ans II very late in December 1s4s, or IN jan
uary 1s49 ecollect Il, because II was at Mr. Gads-
bys, where sald and arrived there on the sth OF DE.
cember, 1910.
/" Cross examination,
"Ques. understand you were al his room more than
once
"Ans was there once do not remember whether
| was there more than once
"Ques. Wha, was his business at that time 30.
y Ans. lie was denusi,
"Quts Did he practise az pbyscIan e.i -
'.Ans | can only speak from recollection. There was
difficulty about getting license 10 practise medcine
know thai in one or instances he administered 10
me- as he has done since have returned to the United
States having very great confidence in his skill as
physician,
"Mr May You do not know that he pracused any
other professonl
'sAns | do not know that he did"
The testimony OF General Thompson does not in the
least help the effort 10 make physician of the defendant
before investments at La4uDlllas 30, here
eight Witnesses and of them witness for the
defence who proving 80 far asthe evidence IN
the goes that the Defendants were such as
resulted exclusively and solely IRON the practice oil den
tstry.
Now II is sought to mpeach some Of these witnesses
You are invited TO hesitate about Mr. Aochae testimony,
because he had claim against Mexico but shall not
tro lble YOU with repeating the answer which made
Yesterday to that OF objection. Because Mr Aocha
had claim against Mexico, and there is possibility
that Mexico may oil these days take II into her head
10 put forward pretenson, already repudaied in ad
vance by our government the surplus, or 10 the amount
of any claim already paid, which may, on investigation,
turn ont TO be fraudulent Mr.. Aocba il supposed to be
speaking under such bias ought 10 discredt him
with the Jury. Mr. Togno ~ assaied on the same
ground Your attention has been directed very
y to the history OF bis caimto his having asked for
much and having got but little and you are expected TO
suppose that his head running the hope tha, Mexco
may reclaim the money paid 10 Gardiner; that the Un
ted States may INIT The preenson, and may pay Iogno
OF the fund II s sought to Impeacb the fesumony
Of this witness on aneher ground tie tesnnsd ,nat IN
June, s3T be the defendant IN the cry OF eA.o
and this statement it will be cooended' n oontraa,cea
by several witnesses for tho defendant Let us look
at the testimony