The miners' express. (Dubuque, Iowa) 1849-1854, 1853-04-27

q No lG7 Bridget Michigan. Henry Nc.
sGuigan; divorce divorce decrced and property
Edivided.
q No l09 Charles Stafford, Barbara Pio.zer,
Net al, petition for partition; decree by consent
i No 100 Frederick Remh, v Walpenge Rcmh;
divorce continued.
No ITO Israel Scroggy,v Estate of Missouri
Dickson suit for services rendered Missouri
f Dickson while he was sick in California, 7C
days at S. per day; trial by jury; verdict FOL
1920 for plaintiff; judgment on verdict.
NoIil Patrick Mclean James Turner
appeal trial by jury verdict for plaintiff fo
#$l4; judgment on verdict.
No lie Jacob Martin Piffner, George "
starr; appeal from justice of the peace judg-
ment below affirmed.
No 1l3 Samuel Shearer, Smith Acker, ad
administrator, &c, Of Vanderburg, dec !; aPpea
from County Court. This was note given b.
vanderburg, in California, to one Logan, draw
ing interest at per cent month, in March
H1552. The administrator paid 500 on the note
Yin December afterwards, Shearer to whom thu
mote was assigned, presented it to the Count.
ECourt for allowance, which Court allowed onl.
5 six per cent per annum interest from the pay
ment of S65 in March the District Court he'll
this to be erroneous, and gave judgment for tn
Eamount due on the note, reckoning interest a
@five per cent month according to the contract
Elf the administrator wanted to stop the interes
Hhe should have paid the note. Judgment to
Eplaintiff for $1,000, and costs.
No ia Dwight Eaton, Dubuque an
f3Keokuk Rail Road Company, North; suit fe
Ebalance Of account; judgment of nil dlcit
Efavor of plaintiff for $4,000.
d NoIl5 II w Sanford, L A Thomas; ap
Hpeal judgment below affirmed.
3 No ll6 Jane B O'Ferrall, Thomas q c.
7stantine O'Donnell dover.
n NolI7 Same b Halloran; dover
mol I5 Same Seth Clark Herman, &c; d.
No1l9 Same John Smplot dover.
ID No 100 Same Timothy Davis, 9 cases, d.
q In Nos 1l6, III, 1l3 and 1l9, the defent
Ewas that the complainant had conveyed ava
-Eher right by joining in the execution and a.
Acknowledge of the deeds for the several lot
EAouI lHdt the JusliCe oi-httSu ~ SSi''J go -
2H facts in his certificate Of acknowledgement, ar
,;Rdefendants prayed to have the certificates pc
,tafected. The plaintiff demurred to the answe
Efor several reasons the Court overruled Il
-Edemurrers, and judgm mt was entered in fav
BOT defendants. The cases will go the Supren
aEaCourt.
dA In No 100, most of the lots were entered
he. M. Bissell, who conveyed to Dav
ION prescriptions granted to OFerra
: Ithe plaintiff had not in any way conveyed aw;
uSher rights, and judgment was rendered in h
uEavor for one third Of the real estate in fee sir
Eple, L X O'Ferrall having died after the COZ
A,ook effect; appeal taken to Supreme Court.
"a No l2l NJ B Cox, v VIM Wghtman al
: Others Injunction petition dismissed at plat
81 ifs costs
n No 122 Granvill Roser, G r West a
aNpeal from justice of the peace ; judgment belo
-Maflirmed
.H No 1913 Cole NJ Crea, Abel Hawley m,
Etion for new trial overruled.
H No 124 Stlas Foster A Wood !; suit on
-Enote defence partial failure of consideration
sMjudgment for plaintiff for $53,75, and costs.
u Nod, 5, 8, %, 90, "a. %, 81, 33, 81, 49, 5
, E64, Is and 80, were dismissed by the respect
.N plaintiffs.