New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-10-19
Ia " INTELLIGENCE.
u : CIRCUIT COURr-Befors Judge INGERsoLL.
NURSING oT sIEAMaoAr MENRY CLAY.


The trial of Thomas Colyer, John +. Tallmsn ,Iohn
osrsr tdwd HoSs.d jaime. l. Je.p JAMES E I'm :Ss
c:In tDsnssI Of 9s ss%SG. e,%S ..
Me.:T, 4 L Jordan McIssen .ns h. wss;ioa
tor for Mr. Germain. end Nj Mcmahon for The Others.
2h july the hudson River s4d cOlyer &c
peondSt rsSec and the naitenton Of COyer
Tauan in their dates and several and respective
En- 4bshsm cT,t A j. Downins r whock Jaiia Hoy,
aud whose names ara to the Juro unknown to
Motion va. r.ds bv Mr. Bes that Mr. Coysr have separate
trial INC the other defendants He hiss been charged having
man w. ii the time deyoed upon another ofthe
officer. ~,
Mr. Mcmahon counsel for =. the defendants e5esp MesI. Col
from that Of NJ Coyer and also from that o. Mr. me
Mr. Coliyer by
:i e.. H. S" i . sf @
sbe justice said five defndsnts TO proceed wi'h the
Hall with an understanding that time should Afforded
ssSnons 81 whom Mr. Myss lying .ct 10 Dcis coan.y
Se sh'1f, ih s on board thai bs. MOI been
keep public house in Buffalo but on sending for hin
O and viii Be bsL f.I week Nc eating WHO had been
SssssG s Eafops Ssss sPpsd :d sr ms an
sy to TIRE, o.. obtain one 1 Pie ,S .. S
affidavit Of his physician wiDs bis ON impaired state Of health
CoysT first afford time the said become pre-
pared trial that the whole OF the trials be posp0ned
Mr. Hail behalf the prosecution, objected tho separation
Ofthe he said joint osens in witch each pa' eore
a the time With Armenia heated such degree that .hs
iced lie opposed 70 a.sPsrsiion q che trial..
M oT a,s o Sa sas
aen board from that Of another and the defense Of
Nf Hal replied aud Mr. concluded behalf of the
shi .yHT aRI viii the dead dealing with the vas
sL@ thy ar .SS % lie s1s he ID 20 p s
Of that Ne happened that day 70 b. passenger on
would . .a 5 a. likely ssa be should have Sess
board the AT' or he Reindesr If had noe %
ID he
ntt y, persons liable who we're employed on board
m as % he d not % s an a. The
law eeEu plated and he YVES employed he did not s1t as cap
ss.s L. se PIogss have acted a. e1Pn ssdi y rs1
ssss ss omit AID cannot be red osshsT Ihee hss Sssn
Ia ~ ne .seung oS b s i..',p sua b5 h. s 60
defendant When jointly with other defendants right 20
separate M snd leder courts are oen'nss influenced BY tas
state laws t been the practice in this court to grant separate
' II wa, cone 70 n case o. RAE ef BOZ no
Of Mir HsveHs and recently on an Indictment against Capt No
n m remarked that respect gSs %SSe 70 ,sg.T
separate tho other denied and Judge Nelson aief~vd
stated that if he had been aware Of The se eeasa joint act he
he The PGa "; gIoeSssns We went press
Judge lrgerso deciding motion said the law Of conres
state. that every person employed on board as "a
tie OF the eodefendsn, the defense Of he
jointly A first the Supreme Court Of the Uai,sd
sat-. h decided that testimony Of on th
slis indictment fr murder There a" ia Virginia "a
sSIre@s Court Eed iAt in Se Court, Of the United
H. rial Ia not have IA. east desired IA IA s second pat
hat iIal could obtained { ihy tried Ointly h.
shown ,ei Instance hi. will have been,
..d The Jass that M cuuS had Seen Tss.nss ony By M
cOyss bat that understood and expected be would . ss
EsiT hsvns sHtasos motion for
Mr. seM.son then renewed bis motion . . po.tpoosTsn. o.
.,polen % point salsssd th.t
y. ss re- r M':sIs coye est 9s,nsns nes.y st VIZ
that the .enee Of winess there wo1d ,. ~
ss ~He..s. Soad nos ss b.snt could Be
ving amer the empaneins Of jury to sdjoun TIL son'f-
the having prsou. called a.. whom sa'xsd
M sI sss zee s ss sss d he
The following reEtsnsn were sfer ersTinsioa " to "H'sh
Ta ss B.ssr ~. G.rias VIM r. JsAa B",i
bert wILe Jshn HARNESS Aasussus H. C. hap' ''aA
Two eh. .bo.. s te h.4 been p.s@ sp'gr
has heard them 'ps.t ofths o. o. me sa e ~ de
esse ~i,ioai bias The s verdict thsS he ws an
~. - hs inseuen being for ua.nszshsr VIII proceed
thls forenoon
CIRCUIT coURT-B.Ga.. Ja4,s M'Is s..s,,-,
To recover sss2 alleged to have been pad Tor ireen'
ard easss barrels Mutton H'Ss !. ~, 81 o Sss,sS a
i I ca, s SSss g r.. ,:l ss 70
sdssss. Pc Sse, s1rss DsssGsas claim s2' for ss's
Sea ed verdict.
SUPERIOR coURT-B.Srs Jsdss oIELEr
ch.y,,. NJ Human az; Isaac Newton
ros, AGO the value OF goods ALLEGED to have been
80 !. bard o.. steamboat bel'nsns 2 Nr n IN tAs AZ
q So ysrdieT for plaintiff slsi being
'1e 1h rsonss NJ Parrdse SCI 0sorTs ssdrwkt
Ria charged that plaintiff IL 10 entrusted defendant
-rs MO rssrorrky Of Bxekey TAsuaA Of Detroit
I'd ,vss Of their ss,ss cogntsrsa sss
1 t,sy . as. q a,. :. good ss, -ss: as,