The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1853-11-16

e vcuid have ~ y snd bat for that assnev
atss, - san BE fnjurs e -
= Enr ss.;n ~ - re nSnfs of thst ofhes -
ehs, wnen @ tns Le gsislare pledged ifseif ret -
.es Sns s,ay sss the s,hss sna sss.
one when sr;1} 1870 - sns e road a.
and Southern rouse tSe n .ss nm IMc1
that ths ~ ~ y a SHOWS c0neiusvelS
road. which ne ge.a,, gsesslsers onthsirs
sther rcsd shooId wss s i.sss "a 1'ass e no
brace the description Of fravrl nosr Sar y ems
don How, can the rss s Low unaeI sonsideIa-s
porting the cross trsvsIn ~ .sl y, ~ s.3s-
ety and the eshsr rs sss bstwssa Ihs oss
70 the road of the complanants by The mad ~ is
rsspsnden.s and would feacn k6us fos he roe
purpose Of crossing il In passns fyoTa We - ~ .ae
Or frotn West to East sach travel could net hsss
was not iifrende 10 Be recured,to ths sne
as travel that would pass over read which .
The only argument relied on by the essss,.;s..,.,
in supporF of their clairn to this rrayel = fbr c
ptehehsive eaiir they would rive 10 tie So,s
/ guarantee all travel that NAV sone sejr resa e
any quarter or be brought 30 II bv any 1reans ~ =
thusssaid to be esbefwsers sis an; e;tv nd -
other and therefore, nsses i,5; sS; Sny sna ~
thave already safdfkat vonIa fucf rive f6 s;~fs
word this controlling inaaence when NOT wssrsrte6
by the contexe or any sound mi of
lsonot think the couplananfs .s,t;tle =, sh< go.
travel. siG ssSI - -. - 49,. ..'s = =. =
e yUQ Inv IL
of the partie sinyoIyed in his y s 81
enquiry will be as to the re dress tis fsn,sys -
sstently with its opinion furnis far tbs n- "A
legged to have be en- sustained and ho,y n, y
terfcre to prevent those appre bended usr;s q.
pressed the opinion that the record pfesents ~
for the interference Of the Court m ressrs ~ ~ IN
sthroush traye and that the respondsnts have Re
the enquiry respeet;ns tbs .ns sross .
be cenfnedto the sway trayei1 siane M go
the dificulty il truly psrnier;ns n .t ato lssc
vef be attributed TO the Court but II = 5s
poratious without denins fbs;r - r., ;.s - oo.
leanesz An that the Court can So in
TO endeavor TO hsrmopizs thar co,F II: - ~ n
to- secnre to each ia ind elms slc
them, an, asked to REQUIRE the to re
/ tween the junction and the city Of Richmond,
ml me rsspondents road and TO enjoin the re-
;aon usihs tneiT read IN future for the
" Of opinion thai tufh th. l,ass nus. am des,dea
us Ptop ot Haye1 ana that the use OF their
L " ens Iesponeents ior the transportation OF
ot me compia,nants, yet do not see In the
2sesen. GGdnanon o. tne cause IN what form an or
asr G could bs framed that would secure the relief ask-
ca iof.-M hat inls way travel is! Within what terri
,SIal M o. otner me limits 1t exists and consequently what
GfaeI io5 an acconnt should embrace and the re-
act OF inanetion nor the proof in the cause dis
close. s true tnat IN previous part OF this opi-
ioi nave gwen aehnition to this term; but
ssn i1 ee yes i = mot
isJunetion. IL seems to me therefore chat before
any such order could be awarded it will be necessary
tain the nature and extent Of this dssenon ~ t1.,
VEL and how far the interests of the two companies
conflict in respect to ito And the epquiry may
embrace such other matters as the coufsef oh ef-
ther side may desire, consi tenty with the views
haye expressed 80, !. f5a 80
esa.s T.. add that ss @ sSs ss sss e
.cioasaess that have discharged my duty with Il.
tsnuon and ippartiaty, and from the reflection that
afsr the Efforts have used to understand the SUBJ
Ject and arrive alta right euson. have fallen into
sns I ss Of the county m have provided mod.
hrmltles OF my Judgment. sag's snfas tss
:. . ------------------ sa#
SMALL NoTE IssUE- Having heard an
o,;nion axnrsssed bt sonns ...
OF the ouashine Of The Information ~ I,rags No.
dlth in the late presentment case for issuios small
SMns 70 sUe n dns
Attorney we beg leave to correct that Impression.
and TO readers that the blame rests With
framed the Indictment for in that pstrnment syery
point was covered that the Ingenuity of man could
devise andyet the of the law was so ia
rha that the judge could do no less than he didyir
tuaiiy throw the Case out OF Court for want Of eaai
power to- reach it, II blame attacHes auv where if
belongs TO tbe Le sfsatnre and not n fhs fn,,,sos
wealth Attorney who Is an able and efficient ofoor
in every respect We make the correction, there.
FORE in Justice to him.
JyspLrAsasT 4rr,,p -liwn snaf, hoys
= .SAA4l>At sASJSt
Sna named James "a. EimoTe, aad tss other named
yesferdav hsvins besn can,nred on Monaev n;y1t
isst IN c,v .srssst ;ah sii,sss l-s ~ ,sJ ~ IA
roT in the;r nosss sscna h;cb ~ o,,(S - - ~.
n aon,,,,s - sf Eis.s - 80 ~ ~ s
- -, d ~ ,;,J ?, p ~ Nv .h - n III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ano
sS tt,or uau o pa5 H. u @ - lne iton.
kv M, RaiI;ei snd .hs. he ..a $3.50 ,, III. III
nIara of h;s aboJs nnrry 49, [sh ~ eie
r ~ - iiI III sJ 49, ~ Ss.i oaps 1vospy
io5 % y5d axs ~ r. M y ayuut INC INC
ts3v III in 49, a1 9S ut,. n.'
~ n ass s - ve Is r NUNS; nj paine,
~ pens h ~ iI' sne Soui. .a slat ne knew
hone u sns sep, paL sappossIp 90 taat E.tpoIe mishs
m hasg s..er u ~ uu. ~ Z ioo ~ npalne occupied
ny ; Ws.e gS os.ss9 9panllty eI
sapie Y lns suaea ss ven ~ 70 oues as pc ire
qurntiy passed through The building ira - ( :
Inc. slay9I gIeIssea taat tne evidence required
lia - send young fnoIe ep 10 another tribunal tor
slq ~ .sue wi Z" lc ny was ehaIsSoi ana
nun no pap tor ns appearance IN the sum
/ oi Is, S4vo ~ .s.. ~ sA 81 .si
~ -, S ~ sasS =. 1vIns o9sey, sinIe was no evt-
t;e ~ prose maj nS n1u g L1e tlans
'sS.9 Cd IL IL Ia any s o.nss ~ay y ah - aid young 11oles
Y ;s .ar+.irls .nh tsat ,ts,.s
not conssss HI. eath 81 afss arasr sS tis
his ela.gea @n Eha 9nsnse nsg .fs eas;oeJ u
/ Of b;sc.ng S ~ tbs E AZ rs 80 yyb.f sT stsh y,
/ bia, 3yo,n t,;ai Sesorstbe Hnssinss Con- Eas.
| are alfsz ents sf "a i,prsnsr esnSucf hshlx asn
s,gabI $; q ,yynrl o5nt sf Yisss -sont ~ sssain.
fo he cri,r,io.I Tbst fhs sccmsed inproperly soes
M 9h iron san Sc no ionbk baf we
are ,aai csrta Kat re svss moi ayars of X nTo
-f Sf't.J e - ac ~. f~