New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-02-19
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
.,xur coIrpr oR THE UNITED STATES.

.rpRYME COURT OF THE UNITED siAiHo
UrpryspAY. Feb. 16, 1653-hoert w;
"a Hiram o. Alden, Esqs, Of Maine, were aan''''eN
.s~peysspd Counselors o. this Court ~ R.e
- 10 L. T. Stsinback et al sppellan'r VS. "a n NJ
xiThe argument Of this Cause was ~ NJ Badrer
ssiyieh for the sppelees snd concluded by MI '"e
H. 'Elshs Blooer appellant VI. Meonswsnsa By
.sezlaxs--The argument OF THIS cause Wa
z, Campbell for the appellant.
I6,oufned until to morrow at ID oelo.s Fsb IT, 1883
c.,,,r n Parks Esq. Of Illinois, was admit
"A n attorney and counsellor Of this court Meouenan
No ". Elisha BloorneI spellsnt W cSontiuued by Mr.
al Tho argument Of ih. csuse Wa 60 M Keller for
;snIop for the sppeIees, and confiD1ea W
y sp gumsd until tomorrow at II o'clock Al
coURToY CoMMoNPLEAs-Bs'DwrS, ' pasYs ~
w;In.,o u. Graz sss Ti.Do "; Reeve. 4. an
r mnns% 80 e . Comlnission Merchant $4OO,
AVicSooi ~ -, eopsirned tofim by plaintiff the
ss.,e 10 eh IL that o 90 account o. tae saes were
psd plaintiff bu. hs 10 s, nns fail on plaintiff already re.
ead n ~, point rsissd by plaintiff that In sale OF
srsg ne commission merchant IS matter Of custom,
so,, scepfop special agreement There was also
- slsf plaintiff minor at the time and that the
merchant ynnd no s !. 70 pessryss
M n,s srssraenf The question fos toe jury then was
tssSsr defsndsn as commission merchant had exer-
~ - sse care and caution IN making the sales that ne
"a Rave doue TO his business Verdict for defend
o. Before Judge DAILY.
u.,e Aeker against Thomas Carnley, Sheriff
r.. ,s~rvey AZ g. amount Of claim against Otis NJ. MOul
a. on he erod Of false return execution having been
- 10 The Sheriff and returned by him unsstised The
esI pont whether leves, in the case under execu.
- On sking possession under ehattel mortgage, had
reocdepee. TO be continued
SUPERIOR COURT-Before Judge PAINE.
carries Miller and Francisco Miller, his wife, against Hsr-
man Krose.
To recover damage for alleged assault and battery the
soo Of M NJ, she at the time being eaeea'e and hsz-
siss her injury The parties resided at house in
syeuioenth-st.
re dsnse is that plaintiff and his wife came to defend
- spsrtneDh during bis absence and beat bis wife and
81 sier be came home his wife began telling him what
n with stick, which he endeavored 20 take from
-snd thai defendant himself at the time assaulted
1nn Me- brother. Verdict for PLAINTIFF ss5.
Ernest X. Schermer agt. Lambert Suydarns
Te alleged injury while taking down building adoinins
sa occupied by plaintiff, already referred TO- Verdict
Before Judge OAKLEY
Nm Will nd others agains. the East River Insurance Co
forteoyer g. O0 insured for plaintiffs on their stock
one own, hed By them IN trust or
- contained in the brick building. with tin
,oof occupied az sorehouse situate on the north side Of
Bushwck L. T.. The store burnt with contents 10Th
October e The has already been tried two or three
The defense il that plaintiff contrary 70 clause Of the
policy and without permission OF the Company, also oceu.
ned part OF the for other purposes than intended
md which were extre hazardous, which is denied
On the last tal verdict given for plaintiffs, but il
vas set seide BY Court Of Appeals ara the present new
aisl allowed. TO be continued.
'es------z.. -