Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1853-09-23

History Of England .,,. ,.o az,
.c;, mn, ur,Iyrd 10 you tor itS number oi lie
Duort,,Jv Ltpep | cannot cay that il has shaken my
ninuu wonder, indeed, that so Ingenious person US
The reyewrr should think that his OBJECTIONS nave mace boy
impression the vast mass 81 thcuhs'dnn'a' e.He'le
which proves Francis been 'Junna Thai evidence
think dlte only 10 degree but IN KIND if"i hnY e''
d.nce which can adduced tor any olhef Claimant
"It secn. ~ me TOO that hall oil The arguments ol
The reviewer 10 answered by The other hall Fst, We are
old that Fra.cs did not write the letfeIs because Womb
have been sing ulay infamous 10 hlI |" "titc tr' heh
&c are Told tho, did write lcai because liz ao MOI
uYn them Surely this reasoning does nol hang well To-
seher IL strange that very p,oua nun SHOUTS ~!
ess wouId diegrace him! have oeiepea a'
FIsncs ken; slrnce because he well known 10 haze
received great benefits from persons "ho lie hau as 'u
Mus or a, .Velcian, abused with great malgnlty
al is odd that The reviewer should infer, from the mistake
about Drepes mali pay that junue could mol have be-
IN the Waothce talked that matter o'et tofc 'an .en
vears app when Secretary at War; with i0o OF The
abcsl and best informed gentlemen IN Inc department ano
we all three came conclusion Tile very opposite OF
that which the reviewer has arrived rtancs was tl,fl
clerk in The English office Everybody VINO drew haif
uay through tina, office made The declaration which Jun7
meptio1p But Diapers hafpay WAS On the lfs esisO-
Iishmet ana him the declaration was not required
Now m me and thuse whom consulted, il seemed the most
natural thing 10 The weird that Francis relying 90 MS
official knowledge and considering maj tiefe nghs
mr. difference between the practice al Dublin and The prac-
ice at Westminster should put that uh.cSy question "hich
gave Draper great advantage maze repeatedly
pointed this circumstance 10 men WIZ are EIse''ei'
Judges OF evidence and never found ono who dd NJ" agree
with
III ia not necessary for 70 cay anything about the new
theory which the reviewer has constructed loo Lytlei
uo Claims az. better Than those oil Burke or Barre and
onte AZ good az those Lord George SackVile or Single
su.ech Hamilton But The case against Francls, or u you
please in favor Of Fancis rests grounds oi very d*r
ant kind md on condolences such as would be sucient 10
convict murderer. =, go. !,
rhere H. however strong objection 10 The theory OF
The reviewer which strikes ht The hrsl eiace 1uh;s
whoever he as long letter To Geofge "lsnshe,
which was preserved Stowe many yea'r and Of when
have s.,n copy in Lord huhon's possession The iee
contans NO decisive indications oil inc writer's situH'oh
bu ON The whole il 10 be wen ny man moi very
h,ph in Tho rank fortune The lone though not oy any
abicc Is thai OF inferior. The authof declares
himself TO be The writer Of squb, then famous, caieo
rhe Grand Council He says that GrenVlc must soon De
Prime Minister. Till then wish to remain conctaru
even from YOU; then ! will make myself known anu eS-
ulan what ish you do tor me. quote from menu
r., but this is the substance The original have not seen;
but ap told lha is the handwriting OF Juniuss eiei
.Nuw this seems 10 me decisive aSa,ns'
prd t,ltou II. George Grenv!le's cousin The
Stowe family and the H7sy family
had during the atoms, been ex trcncy close
s il ptubabic urge Granville would have known
lylleIons hand Is possible that letter written BY
vtleton should lain Stowe eighty yeaia. and tina
none of the shoud have been struck BY tie VII
| ting Z
But In truth the strongest arguments against HE re-
viewers theory the arguments which, ~ my opinion
prove lba, Francis was The author Oi the letters
al have the honor 10 be, sir,
"iour faithful servant,
"'r b. MAcAUl.AY"