New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-03-11

CIRCUIT coURr-Bsfsrr Jssse MlrcHs,l
o.osse stanley ast. Sssnas s,aayiss
10y freight and passenger broker against thS
SLss eeins thr-s ycars srIvees no iSs =. s., ps<
ninth IN PfOsurns pssseasess and fsss Coz s..i sss
rerfsucd for the Rpvaa winke D. S.ses ps-ssst~i 3.
now wcr1h g. COO yes ssi be ma 40 81. a ol .ss
voes all there lad hen dsasr meet IA r,.,a \.
letting the ofcs - smother Pessoa ysses tsS p,.aa
SUPREME C0URT-Srrcin rx,x-seSrs J~srs
RocssvELr.
Dscistoss.
In the matter OF George Doughty, said t.
have been = victim what CO led Sriatna R,ppsx~
Se. already rse red TO- Commission Of lHnsy oasr~i
names OF Comm to be designated 81 setsssai %
the order
Before Judge MIrcsstL.
Valentine Beoner sat ChNtcs JDrdsr
ana HoG.sOp-.t at Nr j. tenant Of OcespyisS a.
joining Premises No SIT Houstor-t ter eyed aapsacs
iRs the b1dins &c TSerr VA. sp,sl verdict ,tisa,n.
he reudsFsd by the Court The Jury ierd sEe hA
Teen no 1sisases but the building wss seak ~ the hos
the hoise concerned ard iha, esei patty pay As
ewn eors DSendani, asrecably set 10 paw plsnaa
IN CHAnSrss-Retar. Jaase EDwA.Ds.
HAsssscosPvs
Phiippna Ewala obtained orser recurns Asr s.,..
son Peter Ewsd to produce the pcr,en Of aes Jsa.s,r
Charlotte EwSlo, (le yesD Of ssel when is ws asese
tSro. tSst Mrs and Der husband .rrssS u Ssxyst
fruu Germany in 1870; in 1859 her hasssn. dea sss
eagsher 'hen went TO RESIDE with ecs step sO,hs tSs
fathers sou by former msrissel and has ccrnuel 10 re-
SIDE with him the d-stn OF her tker Whose ayus
request tbs, the SAID Peter Should give her Aoae
Ia his family which he has continued 70 30, tl, 1919
the sad plaintiff PhiPPin. lef her husband Aad iAasAs
Snd went to Philadelphia ami has resided ts
ss!d Charlotte not restrained OF her liberty Sc rhs
plaintiff not appearing, the writ was dismissed
SUPERIOR CouRT-SrRcIM TSRs-Beiare Judge
ATTACHMENT AGAINST rsE ALDskNsN
Report of kx-Judge Kent, 10 whom WAS re-
Trte ile question to suitable sum to be slowedSs
s fos dbu and suitable counsel rae report
was presented thus forenoon, IS follows;
The People OF the Sste OF NewYort rel Davies ssl
Palmer sst. Oscar W. Sturtsvant
To the Justices 81 the Superior Court rhs undery sscd
T,ieTvc appointed by order OF this Court IN tho sbovW
entitled enter the fh March. inst to report
wlst vrv the costs ard expenses Of the rl,ors d. p 10
hs matter iucluaing the Of the reference aaa
that the ATTORNEYS and OF the rrst :, hays .,ps.r1
before him. aud the counsel OF the deteudan
has taken testimony relson to the matter rvnrel =
h aud heard argument Of counsel thereon that IN mi
this report h. has taken INTO consideration tie psndsncy
twtntysx Other IN which motions for ait.chne.t
have been made, ard subsequent proceedings have beea
had similar 10 the proceeding in is and the aacssos
OF law eeins essentially the same in all and the srsunes
on Whch those questions decided having been made
tbs case and the referee has therefore proceeded tAs
principle OF sscetainng the aggregate amount Of aal
the expenses and counsel cs IN all the aud slcxsA
to each case an equal and proporonae share Of tbs sss
gate amount
following esrenses which should be reimbursed to thssa
Sc, sh.nh's tees IN The q cases being sls Is;
fuuutg tor printing the docu
CURED the use OF the bench, and In the OF the
legal proc. edipgs, sS2 IS
Heh,th.r 6rd. tha, the Of the PLAINTIFF lessily
taxable in the q amount to ESQ being 81, In saek
Cr nQuifng the amount OF reasonable counsel fss
TO be reported TO the Court in pursuance Of the ordcr tie
referee has exper creed difficulty passing upon services
TO which precise standard OF value 30 applied snA
which only he imTeuecty exhibited to him By tss-
mcuy The which reported below /. much Ices thAa
claimed IN behalf OF tho roaios for their counsel aaA
le. than the restcs prepared to pay and Ia dscs
ing the duty Of fixing the OF the counsel fee tho
referee states he has not adopted the usual ss whsh
between counsel and client would probably have boon free
y raid but tina, while considering the important character
OF the proc edug before the Court and the elaborate Mg1
uont OF counsel he has endeayosd To find what woad -
reasonable TO report IN an award on proceedings bst~ea
number OF counsel employed BY tho REALTORS W.
proved before him. and conceded that tho labor ed
occupation Of time had not besu equally borne by the gee
tcmsn who acted counsel The referee do-s fss1
usef called upon by the order to enter further the
subject nor to make any in the Zee ofhs cosss
lie reports a. IN HI, opinion ,sasonabe counsel ee Y
the q cases, The sgstosste sum Of 5000
The rtiee further reports the expenses Of tho resfeas
IN the n cases 10 be ESQ
further reports that the sum Of 90 ce /. an sdtos-
al Sheriff. he against the defendant Oscar w Sturtsvant
The items above mentioned for costs aud expenses sst
equally smors the y cases. aI,s he sum of s6 30 80
pcShe 70 each case To the last mentioned sam must 30
All OK which isrcsPectfully submitted.
M Bronson directed 20 the report as not allowing sat
hcient The Court 70 take tho MATER into
Tie Judge said the Court has decided that the plaintiffs
have shown 10 damage that can be included in ths mat
IT,
Nr Hilton read the testimony presented before the Re-
f,rt~, IN which Mr. IT, twlO 10 Of the Attornicsl
claimed counsel fee, Coz Mr. Brou 9; coo, Mr. We
Iurtn 81 SO Mr.. Gerard sT,1 Mr. Wood sr5O; ana Mr.
Whiting 500, (sl oouDsolf for plaintiff.
klr Hilton offered to read an affidavit showing ths Az
perses TO which tho plaintiff hays put but WA eb
ject'd 10 By Mesrs Y. ED and Jones aud ruled out
Ouu,o to Saturday ~hsn The judgment OF the Cont
viii lie gycn On The question OF contempt.