New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-09-07
TRIAL OF BISHOP DOANE.

CaxprS, n j., Tuesday, sept 10, 1883
The Court Of Bishops reassembled at 10 clock
Prayer Offered by Bishop Polk.
Before the Court adjourned yesterday, after deciding
not tc admit the report Of the Diocese Committee, Bishop
BIoWpe OF tLose who voted in tie negative, as would
tptar tie ground that be deemed Illegal % admit
third party yet being willing 10 hear the Diocese moved
tlot he Couri hear the Diocese through respondent.
This motion the FIRST business in order his morning
Tie Court aCain excluded respondent and the present
ing Bishops while the motion was ccnsidertd-
The vote ytsie day on the lection of the motion to id
Isas-bhers kenreI oi WI. Mecokey Of Mich. Dsl,u,sy
WtsinrN y " ali IN haH Ma Cease y y JPio-i Ind G-eeu
NAls-Bhhers Bfowrei. q CenI H9Paas Of VI smith Of
LssH Mos Po.tsl 0. PA o.ey " Tenn Freeman Tex
In regard 10 he memorial signed by $50 persons sup
posed to be members OF the Diocese OF New Jersey, mot
N,vYork printed eli explanationis necessary.
Bishop Meade. in his speech Saturday alluded to the
memorial having mpcled him 20 make The presentment
Bishop Doane, in reply, sad be had heard Of II. bat
never lad been able to ascertain the names Ae
codugy be believed them 10 have been candestney OBJ
timed. lie demanded TO see the memorial as right.
Bishop Meade said he should have the bat the
Count meeting yesterday morning declined furnishing the
memorial on the ground thai Bishops burgess and Nell
vsine objected.
WhCn the presenting Bishops made their argument yes
teTdny ard submitted he legal opinion Of John C. Spen
Ger they did announce u the time the name OF the
author Tut read the opinion Of distinguished jurt
Bishop Doane demanded the name OF the author. The
yresenoIsr eiusCd to give H. Bishop Doane sPpeaedtO the
Count ard sustained The pres nors then announced
that Mr. Spencer the author. Bishop D0ane charged
them with having violated the canon which prohibits pre-
seniors from having counsel unless the respond- i al
lowed the advantage. The debate was continued
Until Ii i the general opinion that the motion 70 hear
the Diocese through 1e respondent Val pass. Bishop
Dcare VIII len Re permitted 70 read the report Of the
Committee Of hs DioCese in argument IN swi not settle
the c1se a. the Court viii still nave determine whether
Or Lot 10 ny he accused
The motion that he Diocese he heard through Bishop
Dodne was Withdrawn by the mover, Bishop BrOEnal-
hop JohIs then proposed order that Courl entirely
recognize tie right Of Bishop Doane - lay before TIE
Cont the result Of Investigation caused 10 be made By
Convention If New Jerey into the tTuih Of charges
ma &C in q former lECsenifnent ms was rejected
Bishop Elliott offered order that a. this any sub
seCueIi ss Of the proceedings the Couri VII cheerfay
hear from kepouenf tie results Of investigation b.
| CONVENTION Of SewJersoy into the charges Adopted
\ unsnimously.
B.shop Do.ne said While thankful Tor small favors be
REGARDED this all and considered TIE action al
together as rejection Of his Diocese Before proceeding
with he argument in the scond motion proposed BY him
,h.. The L. BE dismissed Bishop D0ane put the
question Is the Anng of the order just adopted that
Respcudsn then present 10 the Court the pspr pre-
unrsd bv The Committee Of his Diocese together with the
testimony and acts q the Co1veIticl and Ehzs sad
! ts7s VII b. entered On the Jorlual
Afes p1ya.s Gslbess.oa t. Co-i. Eel1.c la. Il