New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-06-28

blind supers,ious and ihst they would overthrow the
Repsbhc to agcrardize The Church. Here are some o
The charges No~. the large and liberal minds asoc'e'
them-utierly rspudsts them hsa OF generous mind'
overlook them and hope that II tue their tans VIII yea
to the Influence of edseaon of free intercourse oil "a
lghtsnnent and a more experienced appreciation o
Liberty Well VIA, have We in this review The most
distinct and emphatic proof that these are true-true 70
the letter The nan who writes It is no. thank God an
risbmap H. is no; Catholic. bu, ysgrsnt from urAi
ism and unbeef although he assumes u speak r tue
Church and ,uccesdsi in bsck-ning and believing her.
The sturdy POLICEMAN Of The Bris0ne Ga-,te lthus take
leave designate The Bosa Po said time ago that
bed shed his blood assuming suppose tia, be has blood
10 maintain the Republic What ofthst' Heres Higher
Law which proclans the said Republic be the fruitful
source OF mortal sin Yet the things are not irrecon
cilSble, is there mach anisgOnism may sup
pose Hereafter, should The Republcanism of The Plot
be svouched what easier for the reviewer than say
70 bis readers All blind people you do ne, know what
lis best for you The POttsugh you Submission and ale
glance vet because IL 6eicrcf your artl 6uf yosT
srisesf cosrss."
In this article the modern Apostle refers TO- and relies
an older one Of the kidney Whether he had sradus
ted in the school and gone through the same trans
mutations IS not isd. This Apostle D.. Ii Padre Gung
Jesuit Of the Roman College The father writes in this
wise:
We are bound by the natural lay and the divine posi-
tive law under the titles of loyalty and duty to reverence
snd obey our temporal supeois For IN me Temporal or
tie says Let every soul be subject to higher powers
fer there is p0rsr JEt from Got and "o'e nat are are
ordained Il God Therefore he that ressteh the power
r,sseih the ordinance of God And thy that resist par
chase 70 Gk,mSclrss danH0ttOH !''
As II is evident that human authority Is aerer to be
obeyed in those things which contrary 10 the law OF
God 20 it is that wicked rulers, il they
abuse The authority csnfded 10 them most sssuredy 80
BE- obeytd IN al things which are per- So lawisL'
end concludes thus, asking
whether may ever be lawful to rebel. NEvER!'
The father is blank positive II is never lawful to rebel
Nevertheless the logic of the conclusion is not so plain to
others Letus see Here are the premises.
Human authority is 10 be obeyed where il is con
irary 10 the law OF God SIC io9uifur Gary
And therefore" conclud-th he, IT lawful to
rebel Had Father Gary been in place Of the erudte
Irish sohoolmsster who pressed for definition Of
invasion he would have given wittier and prooundsr
answer than the puzzled Cet He would not have said
an invasion is-is-is-sn INVASION, and repeated i
thrice three times be would have settled the question at
once thus mayhsp in the latin tongue an invasion Is
not An invasion Human authority is never to BE- obey
3D. therefore human authority IS never to be dsooeyed
Very clear, conclusive and comcsl wthsl
Look at the above rst extract The text herein cited
and stranger one Give unto C@sar that which is Ce
sars were spoken when Nero reigned in Rome. fthey
made It never law ful TO rebel there would have been slim
account by thlt lit OF poor DToNunvhS AohpVt"f VI
indeed Spiritual Kingdom" But pas'aat wonder
cid the Instrument obey the higher power was the
French Republic power ordained and resistance to
H. resistance 10 the ordinance OF God or an oath Of ddei
~ to H. binding oath finally, whether Napoleon rros
las been presented with copy of the Fathers treatise, by
the Quarterly
But really this trash is too absurd to dwell on. How
ever the object to which IS made subserylent Is very
rspable 1t Is used to false and cowardy attack
II 1T f.a. urHav ha fhna in a
ducos:
4Scme enthusiastic Young men, impatient of peaceful
agaiion for egsave redress of grievances undertook
TO improvise Irish revolution, with what success Il IS
needless to say. In their movement the result Oh nmcn
the vord has Gen. they endeavOred TO make appear 70
rusn here and home that the Irish cause the ustics
Of which no one que ons differed in essential ptiou
lar from that OF the Continental Democrats
After this flourish which some wicked wag may be liz
elm ed TO test by crossreadng line thereof with the cele
brat.d Garys-never lawful rebel the reviewer says
A popular vote, the voice of baptized radical or an
article IN paper controlled by fallen Catholic, was re-
garded by some decision TO which the priest sent 10
preach and to eachhe bishop, sent by the Holy Ghes
TO rule over the tockthe Pope the very vicar OF Jess
Chtst-should submit The radical, who seldom heard
Mass and never 10 confession volunteered not only
10 instruct Int 10 raten the prsf and 10 tell him vha
docfrne h. shob not preach from me altar and rhdf d.
cistons he shouid not gre IN he cogtesst0HaL'
The above is not alone unreasonable and lOgcal-itis
distinctly emphaiicaly, entirely "JHy untrue No 10
ever uttered any such sentiments uttered sentiments
of the same or like or kindred meaning, or any sent
ments that could be tortured into such meaning. No
Protestant confederated with those Catholics did Upon
them ALL it is foul boodless hearess calamny lie says
further
"The radical who seldom heard Mass, and went
20 confession volunteered only instruct but TO threat
the pTes and ~ tell him what doctrines be should not
preach from the altar and what decisions he should not
give in the confessional The fallen Catholic it must be
admitted logical in his doctrine. His democratic prin
cpes urged him to he cODsisteDttO apply them univer
sally They we're Protestant, -atheistlcsl and they
were true in the street in the shop IN tue town hail. how
could they be iase wlthln the walls Oh the C@lhVic
mating hoEsc"
The italics are the reviewers The quotation is his lie
uses the quotation in direct reference to the Catholics Of
sis il Ireland He nsinuates that he read the quotation
in one Of their speeches Evasye and slippery be is
escape here impossible he has cooled this rope tor his
own neck Il he saw what he Affects to quote he can
produce Il be can point TO il DO can tell who used the
phrase when It WAS used and whore lie is hereby chal
epged dared 10 the proof Ii he cannot give he stands
convicted deliberate slanderer pe Ired wne against
the truth Judged out Of lis VA mouth.
The writer Of the foregoing does not sTov his name
The cau.e IS not fear WsI ~ shrink from respOnslO
ty For The par il is reply and for the most par!
deals ny with the reasons Of the reviewer and not with
himself A. far as the discussion confined 70 the subject
the arguments at either side would gan nothing by name.
But 10 apology IS due to who undertakes to adge
mans nsilyss, belle Their conduct ana steal he s0Jd
nsue-uen n HON he never knew, and Il would seem
not know Ii any hsrsh language DO used IN repelng
csiumuies OF them It Is his own iadit CATHOLICS
BROOKLYN ITEMS.
Covxoy CousclL I1ENs-The Board met las, evening,
Aid Rice ia the CHAR.