New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-07-28
LAW INTELLIGENCE
coukr OF COMMON rLElSGtNsEAt TsSN-Bsae judges
WV" - nAtN sad Woopsvfr.

TIE following are points in some Of the decisions aread!


TIE allowing points in some Of the decisions already
KAul rysPsnd,nt AT. the Mayor SC. -,-.-..o
arr,Sl fs,sn Y, rdic n; Marine Court, where plaintiff
ch,s,rta $50 tu injury from wat % No 100 lhry mrs.
St 0sWE 10th. gutter beng booked up IN mANng lhlr'
.i,h The contract not being shown on tue AP
p<ai this Court whether Casey the CONTRACTOR
sN,roising such independent emPI ymeat IS %
hrY he case the decision of Pack Sgt the Mayor
IUc1u.ti SthrO,d
I.pA w,a ast John and Jacob Rehardt appellants
ga sul Astge Court "a oOtNiu Ia Va ue "l ui~
ard CIV tents taken emgran boarding house No 10,
WISH ps,vI snd icst jHdgmeti was gwen Tor P'n'u
of SlsS Srd costs. AppeSl Is msde. -
TITS Court considers that dsieudauts hsspig nouse
for The reception aud entertainment OF 81 con-rs ou'
sst.is> the accommodation ufmug they were I'm.
ltvges so ise Tor the side kv Pns Of baggage pa ed
IN tttr lanes; ara especially were they IN 's case as
they % sgreed 10 Keep the trunk sep tS'e io O"'
JuG1n eat affirmed
RislAr5 Hart sst Owen O'Conoor.
Suit under the IL law tor Sork on oaldns eo,ner WI
ham snd Frankfort tried IN Second District Coar Ia
~hict i've gnent given for plaintiff OF 81 90 ana sP
ms Court considers ,ba, the is equally liable al
though the may have assigned hs contract to
third person Judgment affirmed
Mary Aan MeDousa AIT IaAe Newton
To recover the value Of portion OF baggage OF ". l.
BorNud - passenger Albany, thence to Cinc'nnt Al
ksrd 10 have been lost and csin assigned To pNatin
osusni given Tor plaintiff in Marine Court i)r elOo
nd appeal is made b. exchanged ms nctet ~ hotny
.pd Aso Al Cincinnati The Court considers doaotul
m such case whther the original party can be liable but
Any rate is TO NJ presumed mat the o,gstgs vas all
lr. Beard ss- John Trigger.
Sui, IN TIE Marine T. uri Tor goods sold TO Elizabeth
Tlisr on Of defendant her aiher, ano Jadg nsn
ri~sn f,r plaintiff tor s2Ce %. Appeal Is MADE TINS
Copr that the father giving to the dtus her gen
srs suti % purchase Oi ARaT Co. did not IN IKE
hr battle purchases made by her else where judy
jonathan Schulz .st Edwaid Mills
SUIT IN Marine G. 10 recover damages Tor detention az
C.gres after puchasiLg there ticket for New YORK by
steamer Broth. Jonsthsn, which Judgment was gwen
for glsiniif OF $3.50 and appeal made
In. Court that before the defendant could be
hed re yOusbe for representations made by H,cnres
sou Co. II should have been shown thst they were ms
Igeuis or AZ least that they had authority to make con
t.e;s for tn sae Of tickets Toe handful sho WAS not
sufficient Judgment reversed.
Wa Auter r.penden the Hudson River Railroad Company
SUIT AsTiIe CoUt Tor lry 'rse and cart Of plan
tf % the rsro track in Ibis city verdict given for
paint Il Of So. Appeal Is made This Court considers
;ha the Juole, trial, n, ud have charged that
th-Ie negligence on the part OF the driver oil the
car that ysIn eOud not recover also, ina there was
error IL tn Judge refusing charge that the ear had
night On the LEI, hand TRACK Judg reversed
Allen, respondent, Carnan.
On suit sgsn.i under tbs lien laF IN which
veroicf vas given for plaintiff Appeal is made. Inis
Court bersto hello that owner cannot required
tact Tie Judge, the trial erred 10 not permitting tue
o. lumber due by Smith the contractor 10 defend
ant 10 be taken the account judgment reversed
Dunn agt. Comsock.
Suit in the Marine Coar by SEAMAN of the steamship
Baltic for wsges. the defense WAS that plaintiff went
..hoIe, with others, at Liverpool without leave
remaining some tune and forfeited his wages. Toe
Judge the three days provided by act OF Con
gress and gave judgment for plaintiff for balance lne
present l. al appeal There clause Ia the shipping
srtloles thai i, seaman shore without leave, and
remain I'd four bOurs BIS wages would Oe forfeited to that
time This Court does not II the special CLAUSE nis
been inserted IN good faith win knowledge OF the
men Why it should not be binding Plaintiff therefore Is
entitled only from the day Of sailing from Liver
pool from s23 So paid for him sto b. deducted
1shurst sgt. the Harlem Railroad Company.
For the value OF a killed the track. Appeal The
Judge erred to the question Of real estate which ques
tion was 10, involved IN the Judg nent reversed
Three or four argued in March have not yet been
lid