New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-08-03


official neglect &c The decisions all signed by the
Board
FIRST WARD.
joins w. BLAcK-Ths respondent is charged with
sening himself from bis beat without leave o. the
Of the ponGent shown that he msO0k the direct
Of the Lieut. aud another beat which he tai hfly
pstreled This complaint is therefore dismissed
J0HN HUNrHREY.-lhe respondent u charged wi'h
benz intoxicated the morning o Juy ,, ur wnl-
duty 4 number Of witnesses examined. AMI .' or
tho. who personally Witnessed and noticed hs c,niu =
and acton the occasion in the opinion thai
was Intoxicated The proof is decidedly aga ns hin aat
as be comes directly within the rule he cannot bs r-Ie
il the Department, II is therefore ordered ana
that John Humphrey be aud he is hereby dismissed on
the Police Yep srtuent
WV II Smith The respondent is charged With .bssnt
ing himself from his oe Il aud going - his h0u,a HIS
excuse cannot be received and j. therefore AZ ed th
The r.po' dent be aad he hereby Suspended from
for three days.
.JoHN W BLAck-The respondent i charged with an
terDg place where Ncaiug drinks were sold contrary
to the Iu-s and regulations Ca the part OF the r-spon
dent shown tn. be went into the place 10 the discharge
Of his duty and while there drank glass OF beer Ii
oro.ed and ndudged that the suspension Of the respon
dent from pay be continued for one day.
JANIS klATING-The respondent Is charged win VIC
ent conc uct and conduct u1becomlng Policeman IL
is shown tina; the respondent went 10 arouse persons ~
ing the grass the Battery. aud q accomplish his
he took BY the hair 81 the head eld raised h
I'D and kicked him that the comp ,'nar excla nsd nst
his brutality and then demanded bis name, when he
rested the complainant and took him - the Sti0nholse
and thence TO the Police Court Several witnesses w-rs
the conduct OF the respondent The Respondent very
yio ut in his conduct and especially 50 t0sard NJ 1is
who gave Rim Of oense, End We cAnn)t saf-r 70
20 psss by without punishment az the sane m- Sc you'd
RdmCnish the respondent that repetition OF tn Ohsase
will secure his speedy dismissal from the department 4
is Ordert snd sducsed that t1e resp ndeni BE- aHd ne il
hereb suspended from pay for diteen days
SIMEON SrYLEs-The respondent - charged with in,oHi
cation which : posively sworn 20 BY three credible vii
nesses is shown by he test nony that oe NE nsl Of
JAY 18th the b. went in ihe Ston House ant sa
down upon chair and went 10 sleep that ST. nDs were
made w4keh by ~ least three persons but mont 81
feet lis. two ofthe Policemen hScd M d and placed
niece of Newspaper in his mDu h about loo. i-nz'1
for the purpose pracicng iokes upon him thst a. -
O'Clock. when he sWose tie men, the elects ~ ms lIor
sd. upon him. causing hin 10 stlg.eT, a3d TIA. ~
unable to awske the men. and Policeman htI
to perform part Of that duty On mis- Art sf ih-
sponoeut witnesses Introduced . prove tat h.
hSbiiualy very sound sl-ep~g' and ina Thsn s'u
asleep almost anything could BE- done - h. aud
nov thai when D. aEoss the m-n A. u clock D. q
not sgser Sad they saw signs Of liquor MIN. The
sler the charge proved W. you'd b- 4g mi sc-.
however TO the Department did not embrace tais o2
portuniiy condemn the mi unsu aud or1A coadl'; Of
the WhO Tar forgot tb-T manhood p Yrfttr-
such ol,re puisble msclrd Jokes upon old Ens
n sst- Of uneon.ciousues- dsnccIi, fpr f-'u--
rtu stained With crimes Of deepest dye-Ini % ace
them OF an old man, hsd done them wrong
nm AMY a. i cgrace.ll N the perpetrators All,
while compelled - c0uvi tie Tsp 'ncsg: % the
charge mace agsrs' hn W. mast esteem AbJvs ilos7
who could practice such disrac-ll tras Uo,n him TIE
having been convicted of tls charge Il :
therefore ordered ard 90 liged TIA; he and hs n5eby
dish IS, from the Police D@plrtme
The decision not concurTcd in by the Records his
signature nos being appended
JoHN CowAN-rhe respondent is charged with condgct
policeman While sc:inx II the st-sn5 -,
from Newport L. appears rDG he evidence OF the CON
psinau that the respondent unnecessarily harsh 10
bis restGen Of the complainant and did Ia n
gentlenes. and determined highly necessary il
officer both 10 command respect and obedience
There no necessity of his drawing his club or King
any such hostile demonstration il shown be did make
on the occasion We DO deem il necessary 70 impose
any specific punishment in this case. but tie
spopdent 10 discharge his duties in rsspec,fd
ner. hereafter. This suspension is removed
SECOND WARD.
THOMAS MoRoNEY, SERGEASr-JANEs CARMODY. Pc
respondent Moroney is charged with
fusng give bis when required and the ondent
Caruody With coarse and insoeni language 10 Mar
tin We do not think either specification prove and
this case is dismissed.
WALTER JofcE.-The respondent is charged with
glecsipg to arrest persons at Fulton Msketslp who were