New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-07-04

r,c. nv ndsp,r m Ia.- the making Of shoes and
70 Ns~Y sihout PERMISSION and refused % rr'arn
THIS evidence does not describe person heia 20 SCI
vice or labor within The meaning of the 81 section 'th
article Of the Constitution Of the United StAeh and OF ms
acts Of Congress passed in 1853, sni ls5O. -.
The word person in the Constitution and N ne ssnse
used therein Synonymous w'h Stare and the Whole
scope and object Of that clause Of the Instrument IA my
indignant l. exhausted and answered IN It's sPphcson
Fugitive Slaves exclusive Of any and al other d-scPuoo
Of servants
In s3 this clause Of the Constitution WAS before the
Supr-ue Court Of the United states OF Priggs
The Commonwealth Of P-nusyvAnix and the opinion
delivered by Mr. Justice Story and tia; OF al the ndl
viduai member Of the Court occupying almost third
Of Is Peters Reports o. has reud,re Il mposs bl@
10 held other than that apprentices Are wholly excluded
from having been within thu intention Of the smers Of the
Constitution ant Of the acts Of Congress passed AIRY
the object Of thai cl.use-provding for the
covery Of from justice. and fugitive slaves DE-
scrhed a. held 70 service or labsr
Mr. Justice Story. also, ia il work upon the COnstu-
ton when commenting upon the various clauses whers
slaves are described persons in respect % their nig
ton Importation and scale Of presentation expresses in
the mos, unsQuvOcsl terms the concusloos now recog
p,zsd No judicial decision sppeArs 70 have bern made
directly upon the case of sppence by any Judge OF
United Court; But the decision referred a. gives
clear An intimation what the views OF tha toa
nal that would not becom- Commissioner tn in' 's
CONTRACTION hch would in truth be adding tO persons
'hed to service or lsbor The words including spPren
ices and all other servants.
The idea that apprentices &c, within the meaning
of the Constitution have been TAX mp ~ very
recent period up 81 vesge Of IT. existence mas
been found One two are believed t. have occur
red within few years where Commissioners IN other
States have delivered up apprentices but the only On nn
there raised WAS the validity OF the ndenture and the
question now presented raised Or passed upon
After as careful investigation Of the authorities cited
and the able argument Of the claimants counsel ~ the
time would allow. the evidence and law OF the case
in nv dgmen doe not warrant certificate authorizing
the clsmsni remove the alleged fugitive person back
10 the Safe from which he is SAID 10 have tied.
The apprentice John Van Orden therefore disch ged
Al "a Iul N Ia
re.uondent agt Wiletts Sheriff &c. Argued d. bud
lev Field for appellant. Asa Child for respondent.
No L. Wlism- and others, respondents sgt. Williams
and others APPELLANTS reserved case Argued. In
volying the doctrine of chsrtsbls uses George Wood
for appellants Marshall 5 Bidw-ll for respondents.
U.s. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE.
CHARGE FALSE INVOICES.
The principal OF German importing house doing ous
ness the lower part of Broadway and also, we oeleYe
bis book keeper arrested charge of swearing to
,rxic.s the Cl.tnrn u.nsa-nLds. n IS AlaEad