New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-05-21
SUPERIOR COURr-Before Judge CAMPBELL.
Lee Clahin ast the c0mmercia Insurance Company.

= a. ~ ~ cor,r.e,ci. TnssSsree Co1nr,rv
On L Socy of insurance for $500 made IN favor of
Nicholas X 0aley on goods held commission other
wise at No 81 Nassaust and No So Lbertys communi-
eating with No q Nassau ST. The property was destroyed
by fire sd july ej3 and the loss of Mr. Oatley it al
legged s355sJ O. lie assigned his interest in the policy in
question to plaintiff In defense the Company deny that
ar Oatey from the time Of the policy was interested in
the property the TO amount greater than insured
al deny the loss being 10 the extent claimed and deny
notice And further defense that there is clause IN
the policy which causes forfeiture the insurance in the
event of exaggerated statement OF loss &c. The is
William H. cleary sst Edward Kent and Richard Doughery
To damages from builders for injury by falling
into an unprotected in West Broadway already
f,rTed to. Verdict for plaintiff, $500.
IL CHAMBERs-Beoe Judge DuER.
In the matter Of Jane Trainer, little coored girl, al
ready referred TO- Miss Porter and the child appeared yes.
terdsy forenoon and the case was adjourned TO- tie after
noon when Mr. Booth of the counsel for Miss Porter
Mr. Culver Mr.. Tappan and number of speotatOrs-as
also Miss Porter and the child present Mr.. Brady
being engaged in another Court some delay ensued.
Mr. Culver said if the is ready to surrender the
ibid we will receive il, and give good bonds.
Mr. Booth remarked that that is not the matter now be-
fore the Court
The Judge said she made such offer the other day and
persons of undoubed responsibility ready nov to take
H. should she be in the same mind
Mr. Booth sad she made the offer under trying circum-
stances but she determined to contest the question
as TO a right TO the child.
The return was called for, but said Mr. Brady had
Il with him The Judge looked the copy OF the petit
lion handed and saio il did not contain averment that
Mr. Tappan had authority 10 act for the father which
In the original Mr. Culver said It in the original
and enough had been forth in the petition 20 authorize
The Court 10 issue the warrant ana habeas corpus.
The Judge said that testimony must be presented on the
present proceeding that Mr. 1appan had right 70 ac for
the alleged father also that the latter IS entitled to the
MIR BRADY not having come into Court and It being IN
oersood III testimony the return, would have 70 be
taken and an adjournment become necessary Mr. Culver
re1uesd that the Court would adjourn sufficiently long
enable them to send fora person Irainer 10 place where
Il will take 10 hours 90, and l6 hours to return.
Mr. Booth and the Judge thought it nigh! have been
Mr Culver replied that after the child was taken away
on Wednesday they in doubt whether Il could be
got again and consequently did not send Tor the father to
come Mr. Tappsn has had three communications from
him all urging Mr.. T. TO continue his efforts 10 get the
child We propose said Mr.. { 90 send man to where
No suppose he t. and II he is not here after proper time at
ihe adjournment, will not think il proper 70 press the
The Judge finally said they would adjourn to Monday at
N- Booth said hey would deny the right of lIr Tappsn
70 act or Iranor The her anu slso deny the right Of
the latter TO the child.
Hr Tappan sad he had authority from the father to act
for HIM and he demanded OF the Miss Porter
10 give him the custody OF the child
The Judge said he would no. interfere.
Mr. Culver said he had had abundant verbal author
nv c N the father for him. and he requested
nat the child be placed in he custody Of Mr. Tappan
The Judge repeated that lie would not interfere that she
and the child should both remain n the custody Of tie
officer; bit ia What mode be would keep them be The
JUDGE could point 0u out ne mus. have thsln here
~ MONDAY. Adjourned.
8 DISTRICT cOUBT-Besors Jadss IxstzseLL.
In the case of Hamilton T. Boone, motion made 20
ouash nd.nen. fo- forgery lin relation we believe % pa
pers rs 10 land warrants the ground that the statute OF
limitations had interviewed, and more than two years bad
elapsed between the commission VI the offence and the &C
tual finding the indictments. In reply i said that
proceedings had teen neDced long before the eEpT4
bon q he years Judge Ingerso said he had had
cssion 20 look the subject Connecticut and felt that
TIE motion 70 quSsh was proper, and L was granted.
Motion then made as 70 ind cments ag1lrs Thomas
4. Hsss Tor alleged Fmllar frauds on me Government
The motion Was opposed by Mr. Dunning, the Assist
ant strictAtforney, bn; allowed
motion also made II the case ofDr. Christian he'd
a. witness IN the OF Capt Haloney, indicted Tor mus
der 70 reduce his bail from - 600 70 500. The motion
opposed by NJ E.dgway the part o! the Govern
ment. l. l4sLy so1fta-Ie- Gat SaEE&nt Was OFT
duplicating Or. G. party in the murders, and ne was
he'd.
JoLI FcseTt and others sst Steamboat John Jay.
As 20 the mortgage an Admiralty Court only Feg1rc
the legal tie Court IN Equity might 90 otAeTSise De
cree for claimant, with costs.
John A Ha5rs az S;eeztott PrcInesAe1f
Collision with schooner. Decree foE damages against
steamboat with costs
BnsJ b Iurt at wn Il. Merrill. ct Al
Is 20 the mortgage the claimants remedy = OIL 70
redeem Application denied
v Aierro az s.eszbos. NAssrs-
Il the duty Of the brig 20 have sheered tne nEg upon
her cable while az sschor. he COLLISION vas caused oy
neglect in thAtrespect Libel dismissed, with costs
Pz;rick Dempsey sgr Steamboat Johr q Asszy
LbeGn could cancel tbs note gwen As security iof nis
wages and recover against the steamboat Decree for
"'N-'' AN White at eansltost Am Srbor.
Decree opened. Costs 70 abide event.