The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1853-03-19

u. u. I
os,p ssa o-cs.Ae i gst alseat Of Maryland
bss The work y undertaken, we may not get for year
rtwo.
Mf PEARCE The Legislature Of Maryland 10 now in
sessisn, sBn y ak ~ Oe fbr time.
MIR. B0RLANO. | think there - great deal OF force
peruneney Ia the rcnak s OF the &c aior Il m Iowa,
MIR DoDGg Ii Il senator from Virginia nte 0pted
10 get clear Of Inc 0bjes by sayng abdlt sm
qairBE Tna rue but apprehend that SO iar as con-
sututonal principle concerned, q may be i"so'sd 10
small az well atge We know ho@ earnes "
wss nsisl day when the Pacina railroad on
40 for consideration that could not expend money
gthin States ali, with or without lnrir
sssnt but muE be limited 10 the ef
rt)nsa If uniiea IL upon that very pom
hat that bill lnimoaled The same pr ncP'e would
expenditure of this money wltan the District OF
Juu nba and although you m'ght Obtain tue assent OF
Ma yaid, you would have lh ordng 10 thr doc
laid the other day, To expead one dollar ~ mak"g
, seryo.r, ythIg else necessary 10 nh'nn va
wi Tie llmts of Maryland did not admit the sound
that proposhn the her DAY but II does seem
lang that gen'l men who ni mast upon 10 INC
extent of defeating bill such importance az The Paihc
farad b s uld not at tast be Consistent now aha au-
1t small matter as water tor The DIS ret
OF Columbia.
Mir HUNTER Itis very -irsnge to me that the
from Arkansas difference between eldmifg
power District Of Columbia, which Is under
exclusive cono of the Congress the Uunsd States,
yth from I'D j,inng State, and the claim OF
uiae the railroad commerce OF that safe. II
of the proposition does sho the diff
ence will b. Impossible for do II by any course ~
eason But protest. this OF the session,
atlem that Old debate upon The PACT
nc ralr, ad question w have probably about one day TO
bill willing and ready To 90 into that
ea,e aud myself shall both be here al the
session, AMI that be revived but am moi
willing bring up this question here be eye we
bar y enough get tins ui through II The Senate
believe the Is sufficiently well guarded, lei
them i IT, the other hand they are Wiling
tins preliminary appropriation TO the discretion o.
the President Of Un Ell States, let them say Lei
have ison many other important subjects
are TO be considered this bill
Mr. BORLAND. The opponents Of this proposition
not responsible for introduction. The senator from
Virginia introduced IT, Ii II gives rise to discussion, those
VIII oppose it are responsible the discussion. Those
who Introduced responsible II II involves as think,
principe condemned by the Senate the other day. canno,
help The says there similarity IN the cases
may be dull of comprehensonperbaps am--blt can
the oiteren The point made was the expenui
of public money within State Tor purposes oil I'M
prOvement, with without lis consent That was the point
Wac her applies making rail- cad bring ng Waet
the Dsttict of Coumoia TO me II 10 the came
hing. Tnen, The proposition 10 run railroad iron,
tie Mississippi the Pacific ocean, hrohgh several
States ard through territory belonging 10 he Unisd States
several gentlemen said We wln. give money TOT
make road within The Territories, but WHEN You come 10
states caanol with Their eousen' execis me
power under the constitution, expend money IN re, out
restrict the expenditure To the ferrones Now,
seems 10 me that the principle ia the same ere ! rofo
sIon do WDatf 10 nBke condu Of W ier rom some
point the Potomac river, within the State OF Marytnh
the District OF Coumb,a Inch the territory of The
United States through the sovereign State OF MARI and
According the doctrine land the other day. yoa can
expend money within the territory of the United ars-
in this case District of Co unbia-but the moment you
get Of Maryland you cannot expsnd dollar
Of 1t II that the principle etire the same
There may be diff renee out | cannat see It,
Mr. BRlGHT. The senator from Virginia Introduced
the because he uIetted 10 do so by the
Committee finance In dung SO, he Is but perf,rmin-
duty. Tne amendment offered by the from Vir-
einia recommended, Believe, unsninou y Ivy III
Committee Finance | do prop maxim. any re-
Tho set. | Know the Srna aix loiA
vote tut the Why The COMMITTEE on Finance 'e-
commended ms be ooipus u every sest y
The puoc property entirely unprotected t'on lire
far eEa,ds the of water fhe,e .s not s'i en
quanu u w,ter 10 protest. the public buildings from nre
Wafer eJed every pont Of the ely aad tue obi CT"
The make irte, place the oi
selling water the HANDS If corp, ration Wnttuer tn
pesihr' Will Conclude 10 take water from Maryland %
Vnsnit, any other State Mt the quealon for u.s.
Ieve he w not apply The money proposed to oe ap
poo aIed property we ou-ht nor 10 give At; but NC De-
he aii may WITH The hypoth sis tr h.
vail uut violate any Jaw of Mary la"d or Virginia HINGE
mink unatet airy 10 discuss uhht polut
MIR RUSh. I sla iur tbs amendment of the sem
dtor un Mary land, because ttnA proper d. not
link thai The Unit d Il u risU to 80 and
ter FRI STA Il Mary laid her .nse,t bs-
tnpy Interfere very much ~uh the terna nprgvs-
u..nls OF Al hugh, remarkably snxi u
uf dnent a originally proposed, without that 81
the na1r from Maryland viii be to c.rum CT be I e
Resident and compel huu Ike ~atr pac wher'
gertiemrn say htre a suii lent suppy, apne
u,nd that wr pre'e I'd thai the Pr,sJe Of The urd
States cou go, hnut the cut OF MARY laid aud TAX
supry If ~ae, frum that State
H. Il c'intihoe, 10 70
he III cusson OF the Prncpie IN reference "a Tue Pche
nlroud hill which up other day. There l., how
DIS incton betwe that sppr priation ami th-
wich IL senat fiom wa AID Arkansas VI, ssrs.
ID pcG and BosLANp1 did uraw. That eppro-
praon Tor naona and general objec III winch The wno'
Unnci States Concerned TINS pr pration fur
sp cal local otjeci, which bu small Cal
c.rned. II the prlnepie good u exsoae
rational oleci, cetuin oush tn be good enough l.,
GUIDE NIL one. But had no difficulty tn sbjrct,
AMI therefore have difficulty tns shail sot. io
the amendment
MIR. roUCEY. There is proposition here that hos
reference only the District of Colu ubs There nothing
the Appropriated that refers the State OF Mar
the of Virginia There rs, Therefore, occa-
for the provio the President of the United Saus
shall not do what he has no poaer TO do. There
legislation here proposing into the State of MARY land
tntero with the urs lcuon of that State You might
well introduce clause here that the President should
template think the proviso, therefore, is entirely
cali-u for
Gentlemen have alluded what took place the Other
day upon the Pacific railroad bill Sir that propos,-
10 build road within Sate, and appropriate money
for that purpose direct interference with the
of the State upon the face OF the bill ITSELF Il very s-
proprine therefore, and such the judgment Of the
Senate that that part Of the ball should be stricken out
but there noh'ng of that kind ia the proposition now
under consideration The provso Just as
as my Other that might be imagined.
| Mr.. BDRLAND. 1 would ask the senator from Com
nccucut Mr.. fouoHr question. Does the orig
amendment necessarily propose that these
shall he constructed ~ part IN the State Of Maryland No
believes that the work be done the District
Columbia All admit that a part of tn. money must be ex
pended IN the State OF Maryland bocsnse whether the
be dra from Rock creek he Potomac,
that Stas The provision Of The amend nent q tn amend
ments thstf in the execution Of this lew necessity shall