New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-08-05
THE GREAT PATENT CASE.

In consequence of the late hour at which our re-
porter forwarded the concluding portion Of Gov Sew
ards able argument in the Of Slckes and Others
against Corss and others before Judge Nelson in the
L 5 District Court We we're snable yesterday TO IN
sert the following 81 nopsis of Mr. Ames's speech Mr..
Ames opened for the d,fendan,s:
The pr sent being application to the discretion of the
Court NUT be grated or refused ccrdnZ to the car
Gun stances Of his No coubt wever certain els
n,1ts en,r into The rules by which Court o Equity Ars
guC in The exercise OF Their discretion upon such App
Gallons and The general rule IS that svahd patent ana
org exclusive posse son and uicngemen NJ when these
ste1hnvp giv, prtua f1cte ri ht to preliminary inanc
top and must be- displaced BY proof or some other equity
,hoen by The respondent in oreer successfully u resist 'he
APPLICATION
lst how Tar and for what eng'h OF time has there been
an ,xclusv- POSSESSION OF tte pateAt rgnt
3D. How the plaintiff proved, or the defendant sue
c,ceo in raising doub as to the novelty OF the alleged
LNeIuol
20 Hos far is there proof Of doubts as to, the in
fin cement IT The patent BY tie responoenis; and
81 " in al II uu, ,ion grated harm TO the re-
srorderi houd turn out that he VAs entitled t. uss
II tlg CLAN 90 TO be patented, than good - the pah
rn il II should turn tut that he ~as emitted 70 exclude IN
T., III ia, We of for IL vii. though the Chancellor
M il cre sCair. the defenden h. will refuse to en- nm
His oton 20 .Ijon u opposed on me three ss'e'a
grounds Of want ~ possession, novelty at INVENTION ana
raof Of fngeuent ano ihe an ground ~ 70 hssss
oure \ Gutter, whose business would b- broken lp-an
irirrN in TIE nature of frepsrt Die ri,c--t en ln-d
f using their engine whereas, u en'ilrd, the pitnt
vii have dhc y IN recovering i.om them tue ''tea
prce of bis ysteIt night , .
lie Tp,u Ferry Company Of New lork-a Company EN-
ulo>ng len stesub ss-h.d us.d openly and claiming 4
III if 10 use The uyenl'n OF Mr. h'sg o ths urn OF
E.rg & sntialy the sans con'rv tnee
retet ted by Sckes-w th his Sckles knowledge ana IN
open defiance oi biz clam ever since ms patent "-s issued
g. n aud that the Urn Of hogg DIANA. f-'ne i
he lost in p,rtaut AID resp table hfms ot -n<ine
Luild4rs 10 Nek i0rk-ha1 manufactured snd soi me
sane coItrivance from ihe time 80 their e1ence up ''
m. lreseif CAV rac,r ike or un-sn - lie a'o en-
oaVoreo 20 show that he verdict "banrd IN - u iAN'r
of the rafett.t IN the Circuit Court 10 ms Crclt gast
| John + Rodman obtained by Couu,i, d. h"i Oren
tlofd ID by ind -meit or e1-cnnon ana A ol ne
r-rs.r a. - coy.vt- ~ IN. pl.lutf % tue d-i uda
IN that acron 4 oueibid interest IN the p-tent Slt-tne
action ,.ire brought fer the mere purp"se IL dV
tie value OF The patent sI1 u giving the paoAo connaeto7
IL, produced record Of trial between tie same par
plsa,lH hit 49, parties L. ~ ti ne.'fv l.' ~
toVg ihtt ~ the june term ~ tn ,cu 'olri 'f 'ne
:, cir,pir l. tie vsry nroy-ry ~ ~ hearing IS
ted 90 my af-r pNaros 90 week til"i ana tl.l
H. inv, o.e need and commended IA such wi
dance of coub Of night anc % iTnz m-ut o"th o. "nlch
we're in cou'rVersy there 81 here orDse N'1I' Vl
Fquity 70 interfere ty injunction tte st taus SHOWN
/ tote doubtful bad been settled a l.w
lie next conteIo-o d Il = ze- upon ne constfas Q o'
Lie pa,tLi no Ella by bis council va not tle st IN
yrpr Of he tig paieft-d hui had b-eu an1,pt7d "
Nai n l.7c bs ItIIeu I'D l-3- and up Any c'n't-1-
ton Of lis patent. acing Numerous Al a'' ana do-1
mans p port .f THE q and Of c-f-rse hit - a. nc
J ipai4d by NJ Hogg from whom sro Bennett De A'd IN
7
~ cort.re.d io.fy tD-t ~ least even tn"1sn ne
Crr.tu. -.ftr.iu doubt of 'he move y 10; - 2-'
lrttF ,tttfa. h- iisrsy # lnv,uton IN tlis mater
vile. b. eaI .iroc d-ta. uP.'d w'iA 2 l--gl X u
lem ..i- 81, .l ie commented OF, clearly sh'R 81
g., D .r. Nus. o. United o. ne1- coI.pi 40 ~ ,i I5
,l.,l devices ,u1 p.r lsr foru Of Fa-r o.. o p''
81. f!.i. win such q colsru non u The pS-.r u =,
.rr fl4ffh rlsi- GO not infringe - lie catered
~ 5,tsltd comp ri-lu between Mr. Opr.s' .'-i'7
eo4ui-suo, snc >ickes fr the pu-pofe o' s''"is m "
f-, trtosrc ofr-ent ends and usvt crtrunt u as 90
aeon 3. - them. ...;.
M 4 fr.ns .ubu ttd TIA: upon sab mott - iai'
q .or va es far doubt ks. N ihl niil ~ ~
Ciafc-lo- vle,ler tn plaintiffs a-e en'tl-d or ne
.r'- fac .ruift % aDo that Il IT, 81 10 -i A--
,r -oubt he c.uc D., preiunary e. on &C -oirg q
r-',d o., ur.e 4 ~ q ~ 10 So b matter f1l 3
rt,r evoeace iefor, BIS Honor, be VI A.. might o'a
.iu ue o 3, ubt iron him As q th- -l- oi - l-'-
tfsaldt wroog The defendant but -.a' Ja 3D.
-rg su.tit.s Ga jlry, where 3, uu.t Co. ih- 2 i
uk-I b, :; o. t-i DC MS would be Tally 'i-c.i7- ?!
v,rQ..t IL her g., r.
F gf-rrx o. Try sHW FiYse ARrow-Ths ".'rp'' -aI
living Arrow .oi Bost 3D. Car, Treiwel s-r.vr- .r--f
day u,rr X from - Thomas. July 23d having PM ID
= e h..