New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-10-28
Jnoia Rubber Goods.
vrO MANUFACTURERS of INDIA

vINO MANUFACTURERS of INDIA RUBBER and
Il GUlTA rERCHA- Mr. William Rider m Cad ssnsd by
hs A met in ,'g to G1a 81 S sy ess5T
noocysai tLiea In - -. - ~ 49, =,
that Cerd The dsi T. thar 20 such representation has been
Isny wiz seue the Tihi to GSodyea patsnied pro
'1esnilao but on the contrary they say Riders pa
rs tbs statement Nh Rider meers one oftiree hios,'
on that process for vulcaDzns Indis Rubber and
As H.. IN anrs Gua Peha Rider does not use the pro-
cos PAT. ~ Goojy ,ulcalz India Ruboer or
he sdds Ting to Goodyear. process without which addition
Coodyes would be uaes in the ySlean1sion OF oaa
Now MI Rider BY The third proposition tha because
procured atnt for b. be esn ss GoodyeiTs paad
Iioeess in connection VITA DIS own Iateneq 9o
Their he against one Of the pnest principles 81 a
that be does pate aIed Proc eyea IN on9ec on
with BIS 9Hr aienea aFro' nj = : .ey eon'b 70 a
rbur il the Of Gufta rereha and eaa.e, e
4 in de- words. Wha claim . M the
q q InS t: na.Ss dti5 70 he C.. ion
Nj Rider probably esn bcsore By The nat h ne
does not ss because Goodyear process T. a. ne says iOr
mat this lis msaning sppes from oher ode
BY him. viz: That Company would have clear rght se
Goodyssf II chose se:as9 o2ays's Ps,e1t oay 5'
the allied" THAT they not chemically
now n5 cur pro,e III time show the n,o-essne's
Of 'hsse beesgse ihe ed'11 o. Their coz
though IL passing w Elg y that D. P.ss IN an ar,
sei. ofCqfs Perehs g OF aou 1ut
and Yields 6y tion sn proiuct aJutcholc
% Of C-rs Pereh are s1os, identical with Cloutchoge
slssed s HPa'es By boz water and from the aeeo a.
according soutssfn. carben 81 ss HyiroseH u lit9,
ohs hiHse stas in the sPeciel.oa %
caits fsiehs identical coHs and ehaaeer ~h Gan
lat material might be applied to the treatment Of Gu''a
Itshs are 30, e ' a. 3D.. 5e,e ,a.s an ,etoa FOX
thy ae analogous similar substances and that the DO
hts Sors Ia is seTer and modiae9oas ,s
squi,s' are claimed IN 50 ,a1aE oTa' IN ne spsele~a @
iss eaoueboue oTnot Tns g- eject tne same si .as &c.
:. \ ~ 49, 81. pseut Oes 50 dsded on this sery ap-
tuescn OF Ksfs or patent Does sr Rider deny this Cal
BE- 6ce ID oI him 70 dny he Liability Of paIea.'rts o. sns
NJ EaeI lsse, wiz 1out Goodyear DE upsny Seem
o. IL reasol y conuend NJ Ri
The Company IT, corporate capacity We sah aever
:so.bs for iss iairiSs s psred d uaa ~hia Two
1ssls Ess heard Of sias rssP.a.ibs
,oeELedsr the Col and q bur Perhaps
M Rider s 10, object to give Is he Ian e o. some q Tie fs
Bu al st he cOmpsuy have done sIesp they
Ieei 10 usnufscsre atta Pslea and reader
profitable a. buins whieh VIII TeqsiIe no 2,
sslssalssd India Rubber for Mr. GsOdyssr. ben-s,
.h 1ey s sS s 1S zee : ss s p .9Ssi5 -:
tile to @ properly EXPIRES and gil then os'ns g the public
the Of that period h Il 70 he
which be has be viii then BE-
tc eujoy the ercls benrt. Of them TIL his TILE expes
Bot Mr. GOcdyssr does rot rsn 70 r,ds hiaas oosoxous %
ihe chsfe " hl silently By snd Witnessed improvements
pfcrry without 1srtlrz "a risns r Rde cannot
certainly rir Of Mr. Gcodycsrs ssoe ~hasEe innocent
for kider has prte1 BY
mslss sales Of the stock Of the Company They lose
Their much o. Il absorbed 10
g th q vii sgppoe D e1peated II dei-ndng prose
srisrs for irfrlnEenent.
Bar be decided that what the Company bad l0ae
soan q Goooyears patent stockhdsr Of tns
CoHpsny Of the Ts on In which hey vii then sand We
sncther time and o. snOthsr tel them
this <h sst1ge remark state
Mr. Hcss Which al sock tia. the Copzny
desire dispose Of sod" The Company place hg her
value Jpn the Eok than has teen be sod E Th
hsve dostt S b gratifying 70 OF hs o~Esrs
the cek and the Company will regardless Of ia
.v1 tLesclyes Opportunity b o.
srcAsse the from such ho1ers s viii
with tbeg shares thr aad
- thar thar astazl yalEe. WILLIAM LUDsON,
Attorney for Charles Goodyear