The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-12-23
for remission Of The duties. JUG.

ment for the defendant
Peter z:rs SSs es. e asv Go M.
cs:, STAT: m .ia.ia. j. Sey:Ss;t
sss:S = s q.
,s.as Sh,rss under the rad and
y the 4. @ sss. as on
ah Vessels coming rsm the ssnd d Cuba or Porto sso
Sss1 II 1sss
dusy that would have bssn imposed the
h.a exported the Of a.y.ps A%erIp,n
With sarr which shall 8 directly Or isdressy
pay such further would payable for the
%: is1s
1t questioned that this vessel within terms
auth justify isiaa
ton that TAI o. duty shall be laid articles sspsrssd
from State Const art 81 does not apply to the
Of Si al fasss
our or s.ns n HIm n
and under such restriction may be regarded
ton q ~ III. respect The ts.ry q
70 & tho .. no
ko, hsvpg the power to impose duty on vessels tho
By the rata q The would bs sub esed 20
c oh rs sS OF a.: a I n
sells the capacity Of Inc yessl .ore would 10 the dis
THU judgment for defendant
Geo P: seAr 2. Hugh M.sseu Two invoice. Of long
at this port By bis and agents Aug ,ss l.
to equal 60 II. fests1 m.rs.
s!ps. ..tsi y, ne s;sd
hereby protest ss.1s the paymsns q
shawis nvoiced at their fair market
value in Vienna FORMS 4s CENTS the form We pay
x
value which the invoice made
ss.s sS K. as
1851 sec p Jut gment for tho defendant.
Duty on FRIGHT OF SILK FROM CHINA TO LONDON.
a's ts Va:
cargo q silk from China to London invoice mad:
the and or ats companys ssamer Lady Nary
sn 81
h as. x a.sn the X:
thirty esrssd asi.aa
tho Il Whole vi. n;
in due form against that imposed thS freight and
value Of silks in the country Of III
tssrd place the legal 90 sas R
do ter ne duabs value Of the goods and
that makes difference they to portage
from IL port Of shipment to port des
Ensnd .sr se OF
0nacn to ~. ss Emitted w the
renee, Hlsteh s4el judgment for the plaintiff; the
DUTIES sUGAR-rIMI vALUArIoN-cHARGEs AND
James Boorman and Others " Hugh MarseH action
hi bach g. amount Of duties
y The en- Of and Rsd
the Cour on complicated and mularious documents and
the Question imported 20 this port from
In tho
for m.rbet but hiding market there they WERE
,Ge @ rs i fer h: grF xhoss Q, au
III +. q /.
vessel & Which they came back and 'e ~
given y hs By the follow
turned can * nc valve the place Of
The cost a time the goods e,
ported from the place Of sro~th BY which they entered
sns
the css The t ar Peg ISL and the
the r ys Of ire in h,s
sna Inc
nsnue, ef'he TreAsury Department. the appraisers
orsss rom rom s-sssn OCT
he e and sss ns and they s
aees Of nhurg, and the cs pat
s Sp
S a hs %S
valuation adopted BY the appraisers authorized BY
under The Of a must
ysS further ah arr could
ss, aSeea tn the expense Of he sng,ss
e also enc VII VII
I snS
1879 for the plaintiffs assessment Of dute:
decision and the plaintiffs to tho paid with
Wiiq,a HoseIanS John Aspin,raH and Samuel ".
Comstoek ps Hugh MarDeu -Ikis action brought in
hy the under color q III. 70 witt
s IL % ss. ss ss.
M, to This court on he par. cert
s.ted is entered the day i NJ;
weshsrs 70 To amount sci we're
p sns Rsa sooS: % On s the 18th
House The plaintiffs Received from the in
had teen made The By his agents
value set in The ONE The first uvo stated
sas OF
any sss 81 s s raj
fret invoice prices BY sddias :: them exactly the differ
per cent The Collector imposed an sdd.onsi duty o.
o. sw.ny se.s ,TsuP;n Tae applied
ng rctfed and that thsy might allowed 70 eaIer the
goods ment Of les duties upon the corrected invoice
This application denied the paid
the dg les and penalties imposed BY the Coessor under
protest. In due form Of law against tho exacu Of the
atty On the argument Of the the question respecting
the weghers fees pressed and the pub
before TIE Court the right OF the Collie ,er
facts impose the additional duty of twenty The
Court decided hat the oath Of the
having made it their duty to make Collector
the second invoice received BY them in relation this
Custom House before action had been taken there the
e. ., In sss tho
claim that the valuation Of the
upon the corrected invoice and
Bad The Eoods been seized for fraudulent .dcr vauato
or had On appraisal been made the enty before the
Sestea yiee was produced, the question this point
might stand on different grounds But furcr held By
the Court that under sections sixteen and seventeen Of the
act Of 1872 actual appraisal Of purchased goods Of the
time Of purchase must be made at the Custom House.
authorize the levy of exrs additional duty OF twenty
per o.nt for an under valuation in their invoice the i'm
ptrtAon having been made prior to the sc Of March 1851
and that upon the proe these goods ported
producer and not BY purchaser In the foreign mstke
thereon.