Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1853-06-24
To DANIEL E.GaRDINER: Absence from the ci

TO DANIEL Il. GaRDISER: Absence from the city
from The % S S' G i " a1 Ire eafe H.
the you quote the Il c. Advocate referred to y"use
the quotation your stenen The point a. iae Is
he al e Intention % the meeting o s"nf,e ana onfrS AZ BROCK
church judgment her %c ~ aeY"'Mns ne hr MT
~, "' ,,efs", WHOLLY ia 4" supper,
hs: so me sct 81 The committee was real and
In. nua had left h Church, meeting was cal led and convened
m" ,i snos Chursn y Mr. Mcmillan Tat
sion the committee entered The caa,c TO return t. hlch
noud Without subject the meeting adjourned 10 the
I'm. sou OF that meeting and us Inject mat The
occurred between lou certainly expressed your
disagreement with The committee but i mol say or even intimate
hat the reaching meeting Intended 10 III IN Judgment on The
eIr The subject of conversation between US Af stated
above wa mater you told Il was the pnr"H" "i thu
aa,,Ie tn conser-and nothing Besides, stcnrt
hat ynn did regard Gy notify one personal
y YOU be credited that you ! no either i" TACT or
hss IS "me word in your ~h, except upon the
rSi" Yea " You your %@ tyo
Sc Now there was no solicitation" ~ The case as we
ca,i previously introduced and Continued IN The iraknr1
OF friendly Ibid solicit 1t: were not ayese to IT,
We h ore exciting occasion Wa natural o"out
first r,t!ng. to speak oi II
,n,s of the custom OF e Church ami 0! lie
Gpn,n the Committee TO the urgent wishes OF me parties most
~ l.. and results having yielded, Occasi0ned
mi that "nrfent invoked all TO remain
and signed the proceedings your indignation meeting
would made your side OF the affair as insignificant 10 the est
nation public contemplate 10 The Judgment OF the
although ostcnbiy designed 10 statement
which have united with Others
character ant destroy The uscinneaso christian min
ana contradiction 81 your opening disclaimer
- vru icS;sncdy ~roncci Any man or 81! nc
@ .rs the COMMITTEE Of Ministers WHO sat OIL his trial
ot who u. thu authority Of ample and satisfactory cTicnc.
him Prauof each OF these POINTS Ii
Of the testimony the i'm
nam, pns,Irripn OF winch common wrh others l,ece; ny
Iar hal been encouraged 1" can
you nus the Commits OF c"Gnarrc
have I. VIII
yn can nphing self. But will Tor the res, OF M
nmitire r4; IL my Judgment gentlemen end Christians,
ou only rrTaac2 b. those Who incapable o. apreci
ami manly who speak evil OF lhenI Bus nsith
thew nerd iefeEce against such asersn ne Euhic
appeal will make il eco on the head OF us author
Blu, Whether the Committee were NOT as impair
you and ohers, and quite competent 20 Jar
usioh OF them, quite VIKING 70 e set
Of ''te public" AMI as encouraging oau man - Cpi
evil cogse after denying that there any prov" o.
n public may decide whether me COMMITTEE
thus traJre lEeS ~ ao SUN 'e Ia
othcrs'' viii. whom you are associated
lLred ana uach.si!ah ttfe' l.
which have defended Rev Mr. MCMILLAN against dse charge
aud malignant pcrsecuto enough 10 say kheI whom has
IN deal With and the character Of the assault upon him. and In
ropms Will furnish the apology and the Justification Of III
IN yhi,h eecd attack which love OF virtue d
NJ, nrnn 81 no prerenscns excuse. When you
"crs' h,y. satisfied publlc of your devotion pro
,s o the and the subject shall be quite ready
his nd and others amends that religion
good breeding require
! Richmond, June %, 1888 LEROY NJ. LEE.