The Ottawa free trader. [volume] (Ottawa, Ill.) 1843-1916, 1853-07-16
Supreme Court .

- - "
"e''''
lac 'e'''' " " "''" u Wv ",'' ''"''
"''"o'' "'' 'U''' '''''''' '''' ". VI ''
N'> ''''' ''''' - .''''' Wv '''>N 80
'''''''
o''.u', -. 49,, 10 =" r',.a ,l',n''t
ss,.l 49, ,:,,.r.,.r.,-. ~ 80,
's.,I v.'lI- KAN, IL, 80
party 'H'"ei blf' Aid gate To- ~ erected
aCl ite u.a,a - pas, t,u"Uga dem and over nl'
l,nI f,r , time. Hrll. that thi. va. mere mat,
ter .r rance, ,n4 tIt he retained thc right To
f,rtil ,,-,h,t t, could a., b, Invested oC ri. le
.-,lr.-r ,.Hf,y,..i,. r,,se,..ar of hi. land
and m, nail. arrested with aa easement over IT,
Ulq-...jI,l f,.~ -s,,i,.I. ',fI ont and ,rt:,,.
i- a---sl AMI the DAMAGE, p,fl ar IN actual
aul ia.r' ID } waiver 3, him Of h.s night to claim
DAMAGE. Thn mot having been done. IA, rrh, to
hi, trem..s.. wa, unIoco.sd
NJ, =, w.,,,-.. o.. W., 81,
peal from j. DAVIES. 'orni,a his Trlnt. c J.
Jni.msn, affirmed Cook and Stevens ior an
pe""ni; hsi'' i'r appe"ee'.
motion 10 discharge Defendant on common
bail Is 'ld'es''I to the discretion OF the court he
low and ITS decision cannot be assigned tor srr'T
It IS to- late 10 W''hi''T Sc! oif al'ef the Jury
bad passed upon Tue evidence
Trustees Of Schools Of rs, y. r 10 f l,h P.
VI a. Villain o Chamberlain and L'''ru'
- d. 49, on, h Tsa, =
j. Judgment reversed ami c,use rcolandei NJ
7. Peters for pIain'is ~ error, Cook for defend
al. ~ error
''', "
"'N i'''' "i-'' went '''" e'''' WI o ~" VI AP''
1879 there v'' No limitation to actions OF Debt
on .iHp' Contract That act rrqrirei such nc.
ton. TO he commenced within i've wears after the
causes Of action accrued Tie act however was
intended to have prospective opeta,ion only.
The s,h section II the act. Of 5,h November ls4g
embraces thAsyesent case. and il still continues
in force. Aie pse Of action w. full7 barred on
the Sh o; Noyemhcr 1851 The act of the Eth
of February 1851, clearly repealed go much oi The
5fh Of November 1919. a. required causes Of &C.
t,n Ike the rre,ent 20 b. sued on within two
wears az pr it, p,,.,.e T. restored the Limitation
provided o, The ac, Of lo.1 February 1912 and
gave a creditor Eve year. from The time the act
went into o.-r,'ua within which 10 ts.ng hts ac-
,ila.
In IN actin Of daa'. verdict and Judgment in
dam'ga' only are clearly erroneous A. The ev'-
.sn,e i no; preserved IN the record W. cannot
Distinguish between he debt arl the d'mages
AMI therefore the proper judgment cannot he ea'
tered here.
john Clancy re Sa'nuel Elliott Appel from
Ntf'rF. opu"n BY treat = ). judgment 81
- F'' 49, "if-''''' -
.,....,......t-l...,-
,,..h,., h., -. 80. .,.....,., ~.
...,L.,, h...:. -. d..
ii. 49,, -.
-. -, -, =, 80. ~. =.
-, ., =, -, 3D.. go,
.,r. -;...,... ..u
-. ..,a....,......i.......l '......., -;.b .t...
,.,.,,,.., a.. I..lh.t hon.
..,..,r..sJ ,,,s.,. h., 81 ,t. p..-i...,
H., ii. ,,.,.,,,,';.,i d. ,r.., a.. .,l., ,-..
nd, ,.,,'.,,r.o - r--,. -, ..t.r r.ri, ill.,.
N. officer. N KIN. them were acting ~ tie Inv
...l....,
u us
The flnas 81 court Ines' % s.-t'Ne1' ''.7''
/, aai,.afiy.Iy s,p-,5s 10 te sffpnsCu.. Tie ls-
f.piln, being ia On. actual .,.sss..a 5fth land,
e.ai7.f0. ,h. sane uals-s eos,-,-. ,-l t-- sss.z
br.n, listed FIR taxi,ilrin ,I.ga4,e u, REM, -
,.r.g,.lIy rs,,.,,.l,. r., Ga. ~. .-.r-.,r
rr..,h, z,;,,., have l..-, ,-..,.,t.r.
To- rs-sycy them. or r,vr-.,. --.,r..yf.,.i..--
,r..,cs5 l,, .r...,,.-.,., Ia t-.,.,. Z,
MAJ -..l',,, ~. .I.,, o.. $500 ,F, ...,.;.. o.,
.a,,.,'lT 80. Nv b.,r-j =. ls., 4.7y,, l,.
tx. i,s,,r,,. ,.h.L,5 .,-..5 ~. NJ, NOD
title At future DIV r., J.s.nI.r, b-ir. nov.
,angUv l.,Lia 70 IL. state H., ,L. vs.. ,J,-rl
have p,iIiL,,, and l,,k.l TO H.. ,l,.,,isf, ,ts
aB,sg,.t TIM. .5,.,..i u.....rI ,,.,,..-,,., i,-,
,,s5., 80, ,b. Mt. ., - -. - ..
r,...t.....,.-,',;.t:
0"h wrong anu ne sA'r'I not DC permitted 70
plaintiff Case Of Vor;, e., TLoma, IL Illinois
s42, referred to.
III. p.o,l, T., 81 D.. p... ~,
~ G. Gotten County judge Petition Tor man.
dam1'. Opinion by Treat, &, j. Application for
i'A,,l,,,'u, ue"'sd a''ace o' ','"'''' ''''e'