New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-07-18
SUPREME COURT-SFEcnL TrsN-B'fore Jdiss EowAao,-
DrCisIoN
J,rle, Matt llainst rchlLad Wat sc.

Onabli 6l,d 4s long ag0 s- I-tt To- forvolo'e mort
gage Of tl.5OJ0 ou 400 or 5000 lots ot nj ~ lire ~
,fasie, uudsr-tsnd on part 81 t"e district from t1e
Iisli, the The parties are br 1-r- james tni
~ fmiy are aud hav- been residents Of Scotland Aroh
laid r,side- Ner rk. aud citizen OF tbs United
states Archibald. SOM where between 1880 and 1855,
bought the lr prry qu--rI sud made trreu cement
uud rstsnd. sitn his brother jane, IN inDugh for
tie sittr O. aGysuc. 60 oOn ald ~ srdr - take me r.
C.g+ H. question: shich oOne. After thu rra non d
4 ATTY occurred and litigation common I'd hya bl tp'Ore
,ose which opposed and the matter n, been IN 'ut
r about D. years much the depression IS .ii ut ths
frouerv n tll &c sad has become injured m mnd in
COZ b. na t,r yet far from .-tfd In
et.rse % 49, couteudtd there covenant N the
IDrl ouid %" rrlra,rd ir 300 hmr To in-, On ptYty
sos lot o., . e. lana became rod. and that this plan
tuf,u-d four five year, t ths EAR for closure
HE pre-. NJ is NJ tion Dy 81 Lord, bhtf e plaintiff
Con m-soD Ia take hs stlmony 81 witnesses in Ed
hurgh Defendant seeks also ~ be permitted 10 examine
viu.ss.s IN the same Commission 1h- latter op.
posed C. uuisson ~ e'bed ior by plaintiff granted
Isaac Arianc- agt. Tax Com nissOuersh 'tOn by Mr..
Oft Tor sndamus requiring The Tax Cumms .
urn the uaOu Il piece OF property belonging T. Mr.
Ari,uce ~ Jonn,t At the valuation liked by tbs Ward
Asstssors the Tax Commbs Oners claiming tbs right ~
rase the vsluaii, 10000 (ilready referred Tn mo
ton for IN Argument was 0pposed by NJ Dillon corpor,
lion couu. a. On behalf II the Tax Commissioners EnO tA
TIA thst he Comm-s ,n-r were nor yetr-AGy M Mon
wi.bec the case 10 be disposed OF forthwith ts the Com
m s,orefs would mAke return 10 the Supervis)rs, arr
Vi Cd v, ud b. too late Mr. Dillon replied tia the law
REQUIRES he lax Con mis-ioners IN make return e. hs
i..r, who ,hau make IL 10 the Supervisory on or
bore LET July every year, SO that The Tar COmns ION
being se0l VIII nave n yer 20 IN
eree or tie amount aud that delay consequently
vii not eif-t the plaintiff Mr Mon ssd he thought II
urob.be the lax Commissioners continued although past
Il ,iuc 20 alter the books. 1r commended that tho
Ia Commissioner have right by Law T. increase val
non over that made by the s~Orn Asses-orsOf tina ward
and that the legislature would not have gwen them the
. ver 10 raise they claimed. the valuations they
p.ased their powers beng TO SEE that the v.d on' Ia
Ill the warc- sd- on the same standardpf ysue-t0
tx ay property hit has been omitted aud 10 take he az
hosys of payers plant # excess Of TAX on the
fhe ley re~ III,
ley cannot increase valuation Of tax made by the sworn
A-.-sors-ttat er having done So already has caused
much complaint tbs part VI tax payers who have tell
the burhen placed upon them already sufficiently hard 30
lie Court said It nice point and should be care
fully considered
in orau one 81 81 puld be given 20 have the case
fuly prepared. The argument WAS postponed.
Frederick Price against Henry B. Myer.
The parties partners tn manufacture Of drugs
and urdines having Establishments in this CITY ~ aO
ara limos II. nm, fr difficulty 80. Dissolved,
sit-r which Dir Price got out INJUNCTION Prohibiting Mr.
from lneTf ring gib th- firm properly being deposited
In bauk sId large quantity Of oruss &c, IN the hands OF
dealers and agents Not pursuing the sut motion vas
made on saturday ny Mr John Bsker, IN behalf Of de
I DAFT that tbe 10 Junction and c0mDlH ant b. dismissed
which was granted. aud references ordered 10 ASCERTAIN
the amount Of defendant damage by reason OF the dnc
ton. &c ~
10 obtain interest alleged TO b. due on mortgage gwen
by Nj chew - M Walker as par consIds r'toa Tor
fam Of 70 acres IN Nev J-r-eyon the 70 I'd from Wash
/, gton L. B.fderOVD, the ,rfgake being assigned %
taiaf Alr Chew defence, san he h.d Os-n deceived
n the repr~s 20 the srtba b. was N LOUIS
and i If wrote him that the farm advertised
f. .. and h. horned her o. buy H. giving her yer
at sfrerts,-ihst she gave 5000 fr fhe farm 800 ia
uorey g 600 morg ge AMI assumed previous % r
g,se hch existed fr, Mr. Walker 70 third parry "r
sgGohui the farm TUNED ont IN hsdy any rssps'
70 b. sisted q tit being aid % lufan z
b uss WI eT-a. il hsd on II but tl- cuapdAed hou'
two room.-ibai there 800 sppls trees on y rN
Their. were oUt 100, &c Also. that the conveyance
sier4d " TIE pane u Catherine W.ker AZ M VIZ u
ssd Peter Waller yherra. tn said q. -DdSh' y rs I
ION 10 /. i+ve that Sarah Walker OF man * .
,be real fe of said Peter and you'd o. e. wien 70 ur
In he went of HI. d. ih &c The sad l. cams aAufEes
in f.. tor the disparity hotoni j. mad i,r -lIuH
D, Nr K-,i sam strike on, paris OF tne sis"-r
- ,rgsleyant which opposed BY MI VIA D Sears Tor
defence D+cs OF reserved ~ OIL, c,t. A.;
ssnut,J Proper sg'. Henry sloan-ConplAlnt dis
missed by desut -. z,td;., s.,,,.,,
Ord If refeTeice.
49,. n-.,ue Co Of Lc4doa sgf VINO West and others
n,1~n by Nr Is. h. judah. lnjuncuOn u r7stfsin
a. n,s rem Luf.cf1rng wedding cards snVeiope
o.ner s. C. IN imitation Of that Of plaintiff or %
ming the name Of plaintiffs on covers &c' lyun'"'-
grsntsd -, -. J.os sloan,
a. p,,sa,nt &c Of the W. seh.ster County Bank ~ oa m
Notion tor Receiver Order posiponihg ". L. mt.
the meal time eBjOlning defendant from c""o0's
MOTIONS. xxxs
.S~.,n. Tax onnaAa0c>n o. re- af
Notion ,oc AAaeamss requraS tAs SSAAs'''A"' "