New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-05-31
LAW INTELLIGENCE.

SUPERIOR coURT-In Chsmbes-Bseos Judge DVEH
In the matter of Jane Trainer. htEe coiorod gid-A
ready referred To.
Judge Du rendered decision In this case on Monday
orenoon holding that he has power sitting asa saper
or Court Justice, 10 award the custody OF The chnd
either party All he could do Habeas Corpus, Was to
ascertain If the child imprisoned or Illegally retaasd
Of lis liberty aud on finding that not as la this csss
10 say go where pleased and the decision
IN ihe prerelt case must accordingly be TO that effect
The Judge cited several to show the action In this
State as to the custody Of children iiabsa Corpus TO
have been incorrect The only power authorized TO enter
tain jurisdiction the custody Of Children, tho sa
irene Court in General Terra, and that jurisdiction con
ferred, in this State, by special law
MIR Cuy. remarked that the writ of Hsbess Corpus hsd
been issued at the suggestion Of the Judge himself The
Judge replied he Of Il, but he had been mistaken
as 10 what he supposed to be the power Of tho Court In that
respect The Judge iDnated that be considered rrsnor
10 have been lrgimatey married to the mother OF Tho
child IEnug it, II in other way from co1seni OF the
owner fits mother lie suggested that the remedy OF
father TO obtain POSSESSION Of child Is proceeding In
equity.
some remarks were made the custody Of the child
Dir Brady aid Miss Porter willing to give 1t to the
tody Of Mr. Newhouse. Mr Culver objected, abiding 10
Mr. not being proper person hehas been galanting
Mis-. Porter &c.
The Judge said If he bad had power to award the
,ody of he child he would have ef il with the wonss.
nor given the father but placed in the care Of some
third party I1he child brought from an inner room.
and the Judge in alOw voice, asked IL several questions,
which appeared to be readily answered The Judge 70
marked the parties would consent TO place Ia his care
be would give it responsible third party who would
give security for ia care.
Dir. Brady said he would consult with Miss Porter ana
give an answer at o'clock.
The Court then adjourned, the child remaining In the
custody Of Miss Porter.
The Judge in presenting his views onthe question ofurs
diction referred the King agt Clarkson st Strange.
"a case IN same 57s a Ia I'd Strange the King
AIT Sir Francis DelevsD, Burowss case Ia 'th East
22o and others; sso, sections in the Revised Statutes
Ats o'clock Mr. Culver was present but Mr. Brady did
not appear We understood be had previously been and
minated that no arrangement could be made except pa
chg the child in the hands OF Mr. Benjamin T. Ne~hoase.
Nj Culver at o'clock aid he supposed no one would DO
present, but be thought he woud come up Mr. O. said no
was willing that the child should be placed In the care OF
| heClak.
The udge said he very much regretted that the parties
had not acceeded TO bis personal wishes in regard to the
deposition Of the child, and be thought Miss =. had been
badly advsfd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IsDIcTHssTs
The Grand Jury came into Court with three indictments
against Edward Wencke for entering falss invoices at the
! Custom House
Us CIRCUIT cOURT-Bsfore judge SrLsos
One the to contested patent In relation to the
manufacturing Of IDdaruDbsr goods was cOmmenced, and
/ 10 On
SUPERIOR COURT-OEEEEAL TsRH
/ Jcseph Ogden sgt Sun Natal IEsarsncs Company.
New trial ordered 10 abide event
/ Before Judge CANysILL.
Rosa Newms BY her friend ss Marcus H. Leeheassin
hire n is wire OF Joseph Newmsrk, Who prsylouslyto
/ Dec TO- 1884, had gone to California Mrs.. N. alleges
that being about to Join her husband she placed the
above day quantity Of household furniture on board
vessel bound for Francisco but that Mr. L. issued
attachment seized said property and took It t. auction
room and at she placed TO and expense
in getting back She claims $4,000 damage In dsfvn
Is said that said Joseph Newmark indebted to Mr..
l. the defendant considerable sum; that plaintiff Mrs.
N IN collision with her husband was about to remove
large quantity Of property whereupon he Q,l a. cred
iior csused said property 10 be sslzed att schment &C.
| IN giving bobd.
In reply Mrs n says the furniture did belong to NJ
NJ but her separate property the gin OF hsr aas
Verdict for plaintiff and assessing her damages " s'S
Before Judxs
| Issse Wnsow IT, sxt samuel Coenfsh m ~;.Hw n q
To recover damages tor alleged asadef' TSaS~