New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1853-12-17

.portaut foreign news, together with q great
variety Of literary and news msttes, editorials,
telegraphic intelligence, ctc. etc. The usual
full and reliable report Of the New Orleans
markets.. which render our Weekly 90 useful to
thess doing business with out city, occupies its
Appropriate place. Single copies done up in
neat wrappers to be had At the desk.
JUDGE COTTON ONCE MORE.
Our compassionate neighbors Of the Picayune
and Delta seem to think we have dealt rather
too hardly with the modern Dogberry; and they
come to his assistance. Nov, We cheerfully
yield TO them in all the charities that they may
choose to extend to demasogue judges,--to
maeistra tes who srs such 70 the overthrow Of
iii Justice. II ~ deal hardly with Dogberry,
70 docs Dorbsry with the law and We shall
certainly hold him not bit more sacred
than he holds i.
w have said that our neighbors, more benev-
elsns to him than to suitors, --onr neighbors who
sssm, On this occasion, to forget the sound max
n, 2 Be just before you are generous have
come to his assistance, kindly trying to crutch
aiong the lAmeness of his law, by lift of theirs
They do %, ~ follows: the Delta's article en-
- r:..v,r.,. a1 s
pr<s1ye1B 80 'o-y ~Ao
ms cyune refers to the decision in the case OF Grail
~ IN 1oes rot attach much Importance to Il, it 10
oey verdict Of Jury 1t is however, verdict render
q gnds! instFpctsons q the Judge
III kioAyune remaxks:
OoasidernF that he present Supreme Court have e.
pey Armsd H. coDstitntioaaliy Of the act Of 1851
s rdsd q he Slightest moment 70 ssy nothing Of the
wortniessneee OF the opniou OF jury on the
ss..S \, ~ o s,sh y. ~ s
" dseiio. Of any has bssn had tovt tho legal
4 81 ~ ~ M ~. y
t...s e ass.tion wss n.ds The tax upon which tbs
cnsscs sdopssa y sns police iury of Ars ana not
q &c city Of New Orleans ss is the case In the present
We cannot regard III. opinion Of jury upon /. mer.
question q a. Is ed 70 sny particular weight but
sixth District Court = impose upon The supreme Court
ne q ~ az me ,egs . o.
undsr ths act q 1854 The consttutonsty Of the act
Set sssr ~ Sovous Il hs ct SaV
~ r. ths assessment Of these taxes question
e passsd Il i IL view Of the decision which The su
pts.s Court nay reader upon this poi.t and upon the
irss il shs sixth District Court possesses an,
mRofss.es.
tion q o petition. that JUDGE cottous aushorty to
g, hs Judgment y this ssss in opposition to that o.
eips comes before judge @ in Inherent form from that
Prssssssd ~ the case By the supreme ooer
small paragraph appeared in our columns rsiscting on
We sns q Sudgs e rsndss this decision but i was
opinion vas il seen BY him Tse inferior judge must
spee "a ~ u :. 'is M Nv ~ snoaa re-
thy not take the form Of mandates and are in oppo
AIf
Now every one will see that this is nothing
sIse tha .,c1.3 - .,,r.J h,,4 -, s,.
m 49, - =.
~, svvh;.h IL 7;d ~ .4..-.4, -.
e ~ "i1 NY assc"P' " plAce himsel'
For, clearly, according to all the concuring
PtvoAs-sne eAoePuons taken py the counsel Tor
the city; the Judges charge as given by all
-s....---. !. .Alr - :,
WIN reporteu ~ the terms 81 the verdlct-this
new Cuiaa did not touch any ouestion NOV wac
-.
any uiaue before MN, OF the non-conf0rmlty OF
this ord;carca urdar ,vh;.h .ha -s,..;1
~ $500 "A MN 'no va was ie'ieu'
with the law: but stood solely on the uneon-
.x;..,.;a..,:.c ~. /,
clar.d srro.so,s ~ d..;s;s. = ~ 49, w
oourt. ,rul;no Tho contr.rv w. ~. s,pa eao
ststsd that tbs LEARNED J,,dr. a;a -. -.
b;s ;rs,ruc,;ons u -,,,;n. ,T;s esll11s
d.nca 4, him vh;oh :. d. - v p'u
Who hasn't al anoroh - 49,. -.
c;siops .bon,d ~ ,sas,hva "a, -,
them ~ far as bs c.n H.. ~ s,,,as, -, l ~
t;nc.s.t rsnor, Of h;s - ',s.
been able to nrocure i. Tho sollaw;na = ~ So
the Delta and 4 ,h,t wh;ch ~ ar;.,;,.,,, aa
in giving dine cslebritv i ,hs noah...;s 80
decision.
Judge Cotton charged the iurv that vb.n .a,.,s.,
snags y n doubt q to the legality Of decision Of the
the snprss tribunal as lie rsbt on. but rssn o.
~ MN opinion and convieon that that decision is
hAv Of 1852 he said ii direct With
sse,s y, q the th.taw being
stution Of 1852 The claim this case is not tax but
atsmpt IL Srsct ,o III ~ @ c0%P.Sss such
i spped and tapped tbs foundations Of our
tsnpted to force he ;n, ns has
nsrshp with tAs railroad companies which they no
the Of contract requires the ~ because
s hs az not hesitate to say that the law of 1852
Nav \. m.v a. nav -. :.
i3;n.ncs 4. ,os !, .onf,.ns;.,, 81 A. ' ', r.
the ord,ranca ~ ;,,ena1 81 ,a,,ah A.. -. -. 9. -
,ocbsrrv ~ 49, /. haa 80. y.
Ground. on;,s !, md run. 70 S,ass ~. sSpe'eA'
~ :, ~ ~. 80. s,,,,, ~,
~ co,st;,,,.;ons ~ c,,.,,... Cs.
M p;ca,,,n. - ~ ~.