New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-09-30

he
a., .ci IN The ,T,iuapy Of the witnesses bat they have
10 ests ate The distance by the eye They place her sap
stapfeiy in the middle Of The river We pu nt spaI
a.. middle of The river a. be aeeraned % tbs esr
Csc az sound Gd, mens ana observation Of hs net al
de tine. This h the unly means OF determining a. the
ale Worcester being course in violation of Law.
and A. one Of The consequences meeting tns slDop AMI
, "a, which Obliged her 10 slew and back and sheer TO
n RIGHT ard the bay State being neatly on line par
an. hi her IN the circle ia the midi " the dyer
fre vss matter Of cJurye INN date danger Of cJ
ison All that the latter bound TO do to exert
Ter .over and M Faithfully the Worcester from
the uftndiIg peril into which she had tuz brought her
seh 1bIs che old She slued aud parted Der hsim a.
soon AZ che sew the sheer Of tie Woreestr The tes.
neny Of the officers board vessel consider the bet
Ter evidence Of be taken, Ide a.
he time board their own vessel 1t Vie 20 az tha
abe could have stopped This she could not do short OF
tre times her length All that she could do was to sae
and part her helm aud doug that she oil that wa pro
csble in the emergency 70 rescue the Worcester from the
TeIf have afforded the testimony with great care
end the beanfs witnesses go to confirm the tesrn1ny
Of hose the part Of the cnmanf a. to many of th'
material facts.
strictly ed,4eed and II Is high time that the me- err 81
vessE should learn that they must obey H. or take INC
The fndsmfp,f difficulty in the Iibeiants case Is that
she Worcester was out Of the track prescribed y is.
vhis h led 10 the collision She was Obliged 70 saeot ~
avoid tie soop and tow boas that she iDe an' '"' 10
<ss,o sLe was n the fTbiddsn track
~ Rs e.ae Wa bound only to do al she could IN the
ud,t q lie peril 70 ayoid H. and having done ta she
Tb seepe 81 the late Judge JudsOn in the Court below
rsf therefore be reversed and the LIBEL dismissed with
<ests.
DECISIONS APPEAL.
Alexander Harrison sckf Sus.n Lodw1s
Decree of Court below affirmed by default.
sehr l. c. scranton az W.l.ansburgh ferry Company
Decree Of Court below ia favor of ferry boat reversed
COLLIsI0s CASE.
oxpsr, Of the schooner Emily John.0n hp Kate Hunter and
suit
To recover damages for collision of Barnegat Lighp
he a Cont
being eote hauled and the ship running free was the
Ant Of The sbp b. have kept out o the way OF the schOOn
or and that the hip lad privilege, rs III This case was
done 20 order the schooner 10 nf up and NOT cross nsr
bovs and IL the schooner by putting down her hein le
m pet before the collision brought hersen more IN Io
s1 ~ ne hin there was still blame impu'able 10 the
booner both because The danger Of being run down ex
sussd any attempt avoid the ship and because tne cap
TAIN Of The chip himself ordered the movement Decree
Was entered IN the District Court IN favor OF inc schooner
IN both cases Appeal Is made. This Court comedies IN
lie view taken by the District Court. Judgments al
6Imed.
SHIPMENT CALIFORNIA.
EHpssm Sutton tYpelnt agt Fr derrick henne snd hooper
Pro her oppelees. $500 -.
Suit brought in tie District Court TO recover Sl2sJ %,
baance OF freight legged TO be due on lumber sent IN
WIS 81 $50 TO- The lumber sold to pay ireign',
bringing but ll5O and the above balance WIS claimed
10 be due In dfenso il eid the lumber was worm
and was sold by the purchaser acrwafd Tor
$1,000 went a fairness, &C. relation t. the sale
Cor freight wae sc up in defense also that the Dill OF lo
ipg only Was sold and compreheEded the payment OF
f ioht Judge sudson. tic Dtrict Court, dismissed
the eOmllent, and aplca' was made Argument was
heard