The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-08-24

The SHssrrEoDR CyR0ULAES-rHH EAsrznN oUys.
TIoN TO BIZ DIsCUssED--Ar ExTRA0RbISRY TRIAL
--0EEAT NAVAL REVIEW AT SpITHEAD-ANO
TIER NEGRO Observation-Disclosures INTELLI.
GENcE--GENSEAL ITEMS. ETC., ETC.
In Parliament Mr. Peel mentioned that proposals
were made to the late government to send out two
keep the Car frontier in check. but further steps
had been taken in the matter. The bill to CONSOLE.
date into one the numerous acts relating to the
Customs duties, was read third time in the
Offices was likewise read third time and passed.
great many other bills were forwarded stage, pre-
parntory to closing the session.
On Friday evening, August L. the Earl Of Mains.
bury moved for TRANSACTIONS OF Nejclrodes circu-
lars, they appeared in the ST. Petersburg Ga -ee.
The object OF tho motion was clearly to bring on
discussion the state OF negotiations, but as usual
the government eyaded any direct statement The
EsIl Of Aberdeen, however, said that no believed
the dispute would be arllcsby adjusted, thanks to
tho good understanding that subsisted between
France and England. Lord John Russell, in the
Lever House said on Monday, 18th, he would fix a
Cay FOR discussion OF the whole question.
An extraordinary cGsc had been on trial In the
courts as Gloucester. It's features are curious a.
anything to be found in the records Of the CGasss
Cei5jaeS. A man calling himself Sir Richard Hugh
Snyth aged Sc. brought ON action OF ciectnient to
recover the estates III Gloucesterhirc. which were
formerly the property Of Sir Hugh Snyth, bsronct,
deceaaed; those estates having descended, in due
course, TO Sir John Smyth the dsccaseds brother, as
legal heir. Il lie ueceaeSu, Sir hGFn, was Known 10
have been twice married, and to have had no issue
Ia either case The plaintiff claimed that Sir Hugh
bad contracted t.,iJd marriage In Ireland in tho
year l196, with Jene, daughter Of Count Wander
burg, which marriage was kept secret and that the
Indy died Ia giving birth to him, tho plaintiff.
The plaintiff asserted that he was sent abroad,
aud that his father Sir Hugh was informed that
be had died in infancy. The documents put for.
ward in support Of the plaintiffs case were a re-
glitter Of the alleged marriage, from an old fa-
nily Bible; register of baptism nom Che
same sonrcc, letter from Sir Hugh 70 the lady Just
before her acco,vohment, calling ncr his wife, aud
variety Of deeds Pure0rtina 10 havo beeo made by
Sir Hugh IN favor OF The plaintiff. when the former
wsS made acquainted With the existence Of hIs gon
,the plalntifl whom he had believed to BIO dead.
Besides these there were several family roll 3ts,
~ moaning rings, cages d amour seals, and trim
kets inscribed with family names and notices.
There were also portraits Of Sir Hugh, of tho lady,
his alleged wife, and Of the plaintiff claiming to Sc
their son. inscriptions Che portraits testified to
tho relation the parties stood In towards each other.
The evidence Of the plaintiff was remarkably minute
In his remembrance OK events that lad occurred In
bis childhood. The names Of noble families with
whom be asserted pc had resided. aud been patron
lied by, were freely stated AL! tho details ot his
education and entry AZ college were given with a
minuteness that certainly bcrc tho look OF truth.
And be stated that his leaving college, where DIR.
GODDARD was bus tutor tho MarcbioHess OF Bath and
Lady lsabola Thyme, who had been accustomed
70 visit bin when ut s,b00i, communicated TO hin1
that re was The son o. Sir Hugh snyth, and handed
nun the SUM OF 81 500 sterling. that had belonged
V h's mother. ANec iris be aent abroad met with
Holl AID hsreaster, assumed Che profess ION OK a
Lecturer C CGGcasion az Brussels is Tire GOc OF
Waterloo, and cBlY rece oily determined 70 prosecute
lbs slosus u TIC HDvb nstafrs Tn fRAa hH nssa*