New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-04-21

The tide and O. the Bank was Invested by the
sfx sae under the Nicholas en aud the purchasers had
me psssession The Trustees disseisor
- snsOaed by them with livery Of seisln And though
and sale be equivalent TO such teohnent yet
s1l.insr had peher possession tide sesn by riht
r-s bis deed could confer ea or estate whatsoever on
ssiscf Nj Gr, in surveying these lands giving the te'
whether in scsial or legal possession mere entry upon
l. rot by wrong and inary and the shtful
rsS expelled either by violence or some act which the Law
ssCuyssnt IN its elects Isoe Doe vs. Thompson Cowen
~ .s had therefore, seaen estate or freehold by sh
sss which release could operate by Of eaar
- loo. eNtnguE~eut lis vendor having neither
sIt could convey nothing him by his deed TIE time
e vas executed Nr aId hid estate coad
devise TAe conyeyancers Subsequent to the cocod
he land Then for the time became of the
~ ,rors ton devisees substanae
s eis N this esse must o. this That man who has purchas
~ who aerwsfd purchases from tho true and TINS be-
- and worthless title thai hs e.oppel decends to heir
good title becomes merged the bad one and In order 70
tbe devees as asanst the heir equity will the
by which grantee has sssen estate
be extnsuishment of an ouandng car or cloud On
Tins doctrine cannot be supported by an aAosy OF authority
Henri " "a give no such doctrine Fog where
OSio. % ar e release. The sat TO The abbot
Observed abbot being senee by livery Of sesn Of
eoaIs being by license sufficient the freehold
So hath The sh But his right Of entry being toied his re-
% which Of the bare nsh will BE- construed to only
70 eOuDiessl entry and eent by eea' Hence the distinction
10. and him. aid ea the dsseee the abbot
sh that the King lord for
b case, the Abbot being hmsef dsseiso by title
, Of the Of the dieisee .oed; his release
ss feoment with livery Of selsn and confers new free;
q the dsseisee which being without license forfeited
peed show that these from the
s S The proposition wS:b Defendants counsel are
IN order to success in the present case: The principle,
tbs Rswle $50 $50 coneusvey oyerne the positions
by defendants ana leave their case without foundation on
Il here decided the question whether after purchased land,
devise does depend the intention of the
That will species OF conveyance and operates only as
s,on nsoSpes as eSae his power over the to be-
the time That the act Of disposition must be complexion
cannot siye what be hss not and finally IT ,157s.a.
: are in 'nb'eyrienee 70 the 'ciA."
me which the title whatever and estate
"a odd under the Nicholson lien were conveyed til the
da As The latter the testor had az the time Of making his
m bare possession tenant at viii or sufance not 10 hostility
tie the sale This estate liable to be defeated
BY execution o. ae deed %hch you'd operate BY rs
title defeated and put end to the uncertain pOsseor
sra purchase fec simple devise has beeD
"a the object Of the WILL because the time of
Inv oI. the heir al lawn and has devised no actous
ope bar his claim against the pretended doubtful
TIE by the the verdict Jury be-
established by her Courts the motion for
ed and Judgment entered on the verdict.
The Stare Cdse-Ceciie Oliver ct. al Kaufman Weakey
kbIn October last the Jury rendered verdict this case
saDn Abraham Kaufman for s. 500 and not guilty to stephen
geskey and Philip Breckbll
motion trial the acquitted defendants made
% argued at the present Sessions. 49,
this delivered written opinion in which he
grounds upon which be granted trial Ste
ten Weakly refused Philip Breckb and suffered the
udct 0 remain Abraham Kaufman.
The following the gned upon which trial was
aned
s Because evidence contradict Henry
the plaintiffs whose deposition taken the
Of October 1851 the be lease from the said
Weakey the said Henry Stne although the defendants
xsmned the said Henry sne, asked him ques
~ in regard thereto
3D. discovery since the trial Of the
the of the said lease by the defendants fraud pacced on
Court jury that Thomas Weakey and Edward Weakey
falsely swearing that Henry Srne did not live in the tenant
nth and the sd Henry Stne did live the house of Stephen
eakey the 84 and 5i and moved from that house
e house of Robert Graham IN the spring OF l8f9
Arthur Spring the convicted murderer, has attempted
cheat the galOws of its due From the time of his
ntence Saturday until yesterday he refused to eat
ID drink and he reduced himself TO very feeble con-
ton by his course of abstinence twas also found that
had placed tobacco in his armpts and slept with 1t In
lat position, which has very prOstrating effect.
Yesterday he paTtO0k OF some food that was offered
m He eat sparingy, however, as though he had no
nquished his determination to destroy himself
The weather to-day is exceedingly disagreeable.