The weekly Lancaster gazette. (Lancaster, Ohio) 1852-1855, 1853-01-27


Ono LEersIArURE--A5joUrnm sat.- Ion
Saturday last, the Senate resolutions 10 ad-
iourn, sfue de. on theshird Mondays Of Feb
ssmsAsfoss ne House. II aidp't meet
wi h much favor here, and the chance Of en-
adjournment at she time proposed does not
look very probable from the following dis
e~ussiol: 80.
Mr.. Means movcdlk references Of Il 10 81
select committee. r.. .y TfgsI
Mr.. Plumb opposed The motiohs. Expe-
Renee had shown the advantage Of sticking
down the stake and working up 70 y; This
body was soMewhat illusttious, and he thctl
we should add tothe lpttre already gained,
by passing this resolution. =
Mr.. LeBlohd also opposed the notion
The Senate and State Journal had under
taken to throw the responsibilities q long
session on the House. The Senate had
been working nine weeks OF, the school bill,
and not yet passed il. They had not pas
-sed the treasury bill, the code bill, and sev-
eral other important bills; andyetby passing
this resolution they had required the House
TO do in four weeks what the Senate hadn't
been able to accomplish. in twice that time.
Mr.. Means did net believe the House
would be ready 10 adjourn by the time set
and was therefore unwilling to Humeug the
people by adopting it, He was willing to
take the responsibility Of retaining II, TIL
we Duid see the way through. The Senate
commenced reading The code this moruiug.
and if it used the same diligence they had
used on the school BIZ they could not fin
ish it by the 2ist Of February. He was I'M
willing, after going to the expense Of an ex-
ira session, to adjo6rn's without either pas
sing the code or school bill. He had not
brass enough for that. We could not now
tell when we could adjourn.
Mr.. Cole said he was opposed to the re-
ference and in favor Of the passage Of the
resolution. II, thought that ifa diy was
fixed for adjournment we would 20 to work.
We have been in session over two months
and but little has been done. lie had moi
much confidence in any good coming out o.
this Legislature. We had been told wher
the new constitution was made and put il
the hands of its friends, that wc'were to have
great reforms. Well, we have tried the ex
ne imcni, and it was manifest that the PEG
pie were not satisfied. They had looked TO
one session Of the Legislature in two years
and he believed that the people, without dis
~tinction Of party, were dispIeased, and wish
ed an early adjournment, and he did not in
tend to disregard this feeling, without HI
saw some better reason for il than he ha,
yet been shown.
; Mr.. Smith, of Stark Ibelieyedi the objec
Of an early adjournment was to defeat tn
> passage Of the revised code, and hoped til
maturity would not be caught in the snare
lie computed the time it, would take to reaC
discuss, and engross the bill, and shove
the impossibility Of passing it in the tim
: mentioned in the resolution. +.
r Mr.. Shellabargar was in favor Of the re
f~eronoe, and hoped d report would be mad
= by The House and by the Senate, and whett
. or that business could be done in the tim
specified and let a vote be taken on the rcsc
/ luton in the form Of ih~ltreport,1 let il justiI
: our action. Much oftbe business on our tubl
= he thought might be o,Aitted. II was a mel
re-cnactmcnt Of our old laws, rs at pre-
h ent advised, he was in favor Of the time pr
posed. lie shopid move to commit, with
strpctiouS to reportlhe amount Of businc'
q before the House. l..a4ia s. .1t',4-.si
y Mr.. O'Ncil was not bne ofethosc Hl
we're ready to how 10 the beheals Of tt
OhioSennte. When he wished for prcc,
j. don't, for hisvaction, i,e SHOULD look to son
other source. Hr.was I'm tavor Of the n
e ference, BAT not in favor Of the instruction
I The code wa@.the greut business before u
Legislature. IL. dill mt bolirve the ST.
ate could pass tthc Cotle bill by thelst
o February. They had Worked uine wee
a on,hr Scboolibill, anDl tuvd not yet tinish'
10. There wnsnor a law yer IN either brnH,
VI that could fully understand the Code bill,-
900 pages, short of two WEEKS study.
That last remark. We will. not attempt
impcnch, The time might be'RrYldnged al
the speaker stTlP have truth on his side.
n was rather personal however, and the Hon
u took a recess. After rrcess, The motion
'e commit was adopted and Messrs. Near
y Shellabarger. Cockerill, O'Neil and RAJ
age appointed the committee. The rcpC
70 we take from tho Journal How is il, tn
y the "infernal printing law" is not blame
a. The Eagle should pen another "answer
? difficult questions" : The NEW CoNsTIT
SO TON Isis N hands oriTs FRIENDS"
G, ------ rH-
" THE Hoo CRoP OF Is52.--The Louisvi
~ Courier says the following remarks from t
10 ST. Louis Republican are, to the point in
Of ference to the hog product, and quite apple
e. BILE to the present condition Of the trade:
~ From information SO far obtained, t