New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-01-13


week, to be heard on Monday or "Wednesday
SUPERIOR COURT-Before judge Boswosru.
Hall Brothers as Oliver and Thomas johnson and d B.
Besse.
To recover value OF claim, aud interest, ON
bail bond conditioned that Mr. Bse would not break tbs
limits but went of TO California already rosenedto. YER
dict for plaintiff, Sl,23l -.
Edwin Peck assignee Of James s Davis ast JJV West
eryelt late Sheriff.
To the value OF large quantity OF heaIcs cos
tue and fancy dresses contained in building NO d Prince
ST. assigned plaintiff but taken on confession OF luds
mtnt By former owners, Mr. John g. Taylor, costuner to
John Green. 1t said Mr. Davis merchant here as,
sed debts OF the party and placed possession and
asssned for value TO plaintiff. IL isaleged that MsssFs
AZ suction alleged not to have been bona tide lhayns n-
demned the Sherf and have had Il as alleged ever saee
1t alleged to have been WORTH from SoooO 70 800 io
iran occurred in lS9 In deenss It Is said tue prop
erty WIS taken different executions Tine case 40 urea
about wear ago. when the Jury did not agree To be con
uuued.
John Curran AIT. Patrick and Michael Treacy. 49,,
To recover damages, amount lald at o3,OOO,
Oct 1851, while defendants digging and eAcayans
between Tenth and Eley nthay said injury
(treakDg OF windows, se having been caused by nesi,
pey In defence denied that there
any but mat every peeant9a was nsen tha.
there damege, was incidental to the wo;k ana
tley arr not liable also thai an aIOAion aaa ose sub
are ready TO pay. The cass IA on.
SCLdder AIT. Hoe.
To recover for alleged OF card already referred
Verdict for plaintiff $50 and costs.
William lie Roy sg Sarah Hurley and William Thompson
Plaintiff is President OF the e. ;. Protective EmlgrAnt
Society He claims 800 for articles Of funitdre alleged
have been invsdly taken fsom tho Office. la defense t
wss SAID that the premises hired Vt Mrs Hurley by
Rotert Noyes and that the furniture his that be owed
quarters and Mrs H. sued out attach nen from
the Marine Court which was served by Officer T. IL
denied tnat MN owned the furniture. verdict tor pain
nh S5l 90
~ .uebr mt Hufa Itga and
To s alleged " have been agreed 10 be pad IN
l9i9 Pratt for inserting Tor Mesr,
H. Co in =" The Farmers aud Business Directory which
work gned 10 plaintiff In defense II sad tue
agreement 20 publish advertisement and drawing IN
heard Of IT'S being published except ntwo OF the New Eng
land States which the advertisement did not, the Al
lege, apIear To be continued
CIRCUIT CoURT-Before Judge ROOSEVELT
ThE MASON WILL cAsE.
A very large audience, including number OF
ladies' present Tuesday 10 hear the summing up
Mr. Cutting concluded and was followed By Mf. Hof nan,
who vii resume s unent aier when the summing up
will be closed by Mr. Lord, IN support OF the wlll.
In feyr OF the wall s sud that vas drawn up accord
ing 20 the directions Of Mr. Mason and read 70 him ~
Ar sens me eonne. o h9 par ana ,h 80 Pr Us
c0nsde bes, that Mr. NJ shOud make viii % save the
necessity OF the herr giving heayy oona
Mr. NJ. desired thai be wished TO leave the properly 70
his son. Jones' &C, az he did n annues ra,hef thtn
giving them Gbsoue that he was not pleased Al tn-
marriage OF one OF them &c. l. eOntended on the part OF
Messrs James and others the executors sons nsw OF
Mr. that everything had been done BY direction OF Nj
NJ and wiih his iul knowledge. On the other hand,
was con.uded that Mr. NJ did not intend TO maze will
that lie rad been heard say the law made very good
Will; that he alluded the fact Of the Loiard viii hay
ng been broken and commented upon that undue niin
eIce was exercised by the Mrs Joness s daughters % IN
duee hun make the Will he dld that he did 50 when
be YVES the last stage Of Illness ami his mind and memory
uusuted make viii that its reading was burned over
10 him necessarily from his situation AID hat the VIII 10
invalid az void The points denied BY the other side
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-Before Judge Wsoo-
RugF
A Fisher sgt. Charles sloan and Wm. s. Consnt, ls
signee. &C.
Plaintiff alleges that ar. :. obtained from him
about $40 worth Of furniture, doing under incorrect
siarne n and not intending the pay for 10 and
he sferwsrd passed il 20 Ny CoHsnt without coz.
deTaton lie took back part the furniture and SUE
10 test the validity Of he paTchase The aiegaaJns are
denied Erd on the part Of Mr &. . sad that M sloan
assigned him for the beas t Of Creators ana tnAt ts
proJerty Ia question was part Of the assignment Inc ny
scansd Mr. c. and found in favor Of platntn asais M
s. for SIS Sl2 OF beng the portion go oAeH H0' H
lind