The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-12-23
United States Circuit Court.

united states CiT0Wne Court.
DECISIONS BY JUDGES NILSSON AND BETS.
[Conupued from the H-rald Of Wednesday
DUTIES Ros-nME NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. PRO-
Lemuei Goddard Hugh Marsosa.-This came BY
esorasf ire tie ceUr. Vt The State 70 th court
s sn . ps S.i .ss s'Ps
s rsa Ss sas' srs sn i
ped board the General Dunlop from Liverpool for New
sqSs H.
% :s e e. .aa III ps
above The .v.ss prices and shi. valuation having raised
psasy sssn,y per cent vas also imposed The pss
y nSsDs & II
duty end extra duties The protest is e1Sssdingly mul..
@ ss.is.. sss;:
%.: s1 June
Commission !. a =. s.saad p.a.ity ~. .hs
rrlsss Ii. invoice states the price At the tim. Of
March arc
ths IMPORTER sats bis entry the PRICE
Vie. to raise i % II: nsrae. value III: Court held tbs.
ket Liverpool time its shipment expectation
~ 1sspsf sssss
's . 4 s. r. no
thorred by his except the competency the
because BY Ms a dss not
sss,ns forth d..isey specifically the psrlisu.rs
siI Fl ss 3 ss:
the n wSaS
offered to to produced them Wherein particular
the
have been Hd arsher hat So protest
rot object to the allowance Of commission Of tive and hal.
such contributed the charging the ad
ssy OF % s: sns e s Of
ns ,gsh gnds. the tariff &.
alike whether NE importer avAis hmse Of the privilege
made upon the invoice IS originally made up Judgment
Joseph sadler and William Harrios vs Hugh Maroeu-
invoice dated London April ID. is
s a. = ~ s' sss
shs merchant spsl.i;sI valued y. GOD:
dutiet together With $40 apprsi.ers feet TIC Court
e: 9s n'psf' sas
pr s sd s, s5 an b. lie sp
chant ~, ,Sppr.:s go per cent and there s evidence
ssaa.iss sss only sl;ps:s IL 1s.ss!
the the sasn tho =. As i If x: If ss
right avoid the appraisal and back the
Il. that Ss Ta
Lis and direct
not enough to pss general exprssOas wnih may include
~ 1ps asss: s':l 81:
decided
aposs him e1aetl, vh. the is enable hin
s proper e HELD ssa ~ the SS,s
tor or srsumsnt hswsssr Logically d.ducsd fro the
si,s The Court sss.d.r: .h.. there MAJ, :ssl
s.1s.y hseauss 2; importer ax.y. know: wh.s /. shs
nsas the he
sSs a. az: nshi S.sP to be in @
ally through the Intentional sccid ntal
Jr dsmsnt for the defesdsns
ehs
Cd IN this acton with illegally sxac.sd an Of
n
e Hc Il
1851 and January 49, and of the invoices ad
q tie sssr on $
% sG ps hi Of @ TO sTs
writing tie several !.ipsoas Of the
rrsssss. printed fern used tn. .a:s IF
sonsdsisd tie printed pats Of the Protest d.fsstivs
and " ssp .% IN a
'ss Sa The to- IS
ed the ~ nm SO IN tie ap Or the
Hose eStSn. sxs'ps in the paraonlsr that an
The himself sd to the import price max
h The Court ned the Latter e,eoios not y be
aer,d for tie deie1 dant
Leanuti Beag Nathan Bonss Jr, and Andrs~ NJ lIeuin
e r MaaioH tile plaintiffs imported an Inv ice OF
pr AMI sddition. say IF tsery per
ies commenoea ~ them in snpreme Curt Of The
s7d S S eSssr 70 as Ts ~
'fe rlstfs to which they addnd in writing that the
hs . tie ss rss
TO sss m S %
prcs' that the sporasers were preud,ed or inc mgssn
when ne D.I;:.,r: s ;P
tia. the pan.s are not owners Of the Goods nor
That the owner: the and not the Of
Of Judamens for the desadan .n' '''' 400
Bale" and 6aneS "a
mt reduoson
% 70 h the
other nyeiss The csiso.sr allow sSs .sIs
alton sf the nsiSes The .etion va. bronThs TO
the sso had been showed This cours decided the genera.
E s s s h. ss , s r. ssn and
titled to rssv,r the paid to the Collector tho
interest, 70 sdgstee a the Custom House aOoordns to
Conrad rSsr %na op Ss ssg .. HUGH Mar
sS a Of ;s ps
sprr,ssrs :na rsaBpssT over ten per s Gent a aaa add
@ Nth TSs p
tee. was in the form employed in Goddards o,re -.h IA
addition In wriinr that the win imported for ex
portatisn and that pl.iLtif withdrew them from
bonded warehouse for that neither duty atty
be e1sotedn II latter point not raes the
the counsel both 81 the the
validity o'tbe protest as 10 the feaure in which
pOnded with The one dled in Goddad's The Court
oordpsy decided that the protest sufficient
able the pant fs 70 maintain their action Judgment for
TIRE defendant
surfciENcr PRoTEsr-A VALUATION APPRAISERS II
Theodore Hertz and Ldnig Godschidt Hugh Martoeu
This
the several of Westphaa veves
the year 1880 Protests filed various ads but
upon the Of tho all che protests aban
doned except tee against ire payment Of 10 cent sd
and The pensty therefore eorng vevets contain.
ed in the entries because fully satisfied that hsy
fully nvoiced by tho manufacturer" Ibe before
Court de oompate by the Of do uments
he'd to It, and testimony taken abroad mission
ard appears TO the Court that facts disclosed which,
had they been made rounds Of protest. might have entitled
tho plaintiffs to judgment such at th Plaintiffs
mapufactn the goods, and old them by
purchase and that the appraisers valued them Of the time
OF expectation, and not Of that Of the latter
mod. Of ownetp in under the tariff