New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-04-04
COURT or APPEALS

COURT or APPEALS
Albany. Friday. April 1. 1855,
No. 1. A reserved cause.) Mss, respond
,nt, ssi Judsor appellant Rsargned Samuel A. Fe's
Tor spP~liant; Joshus A. spencer ior respondent
COURT or COMMON PLEAS GsssRAt rrs"-tS
DECIsToSS.
Barclay C.yds ara o-hers-
DAILY, ,Justlce-A quantlty of FURNITURE was
shuped with the defeGlSntsA Ns~York 70 b Co. a.
iAafeFhG Upon TIE sFIS4s q ne aeisnalnrs - -
=, PhiAdephiA they seut the furniture BY % ne
place designattd tsaf city, with the bu tsai and the
furniture was delivered % GO, they Psyn 10 Am 80
eish ana caItase, the plaintiff sab aruty i0nnd mag
the goocs damaged and brou ht their s'aon. He'd
thai the ABILITY the deudaas as eCnm9n carriers con
tinusd Until The furniture Was delivered 70 b 20.
Brady Durhrow.
WoODEvFT Justice Where the purchaser e hoass.
hv tie con-nt OF he ser -eta hands soo OF ne
purchase money snd app the the completion Of
build n, action oro1sht by Toe sell
~t such St a. purcase money due that pursuance of
.a,d asIeeusui the money has been expended such
expenditure b. deemed to al nten ment ~ such
due ofibe money and 70 uot regarded
Of mutual accounts OF which the Justices Count
bad d.con There toe rrport ~ ihe rsfres
thei only el- - - dus % paihh ara r'oalnnS ihP.a
def udant entitled and ifthe othe
rssrs difficult extraordinary the fsudanf have al
extra allowance IS pat VI such cost.
BrscherIusuu r. A. vs. MintrT .
DAILY. Justice - The owners OF . tract Of land called
Mount vernon, we,ches,sr County AEreci ua'Hely 20
slsd,ur Sue and avenues and thew authorized plaintiffs
enter nto contract their behalf for int purpose
occmple'e IN" ~"rk, The plaintiffs ca,d u,ltus OF Ae
own.rs which u was rrroyed e Il ~ additional sam
should ~ pad by each and smother contractor en
played 10 nnsa the WORK " c "as don' a. An slsona
eItetsc each owurr Of g . The Defendant y - 'ae
Of ihs ,sd 'ssss th I,.esst of nv. ss. ~
called b. the pabts and 1T the purpose tor when
ss He'd bu he did attend Held that h. wa 10 par
~ 10 the second contract and wss not liable Tor the add
BleeoLervs franklin
On sale Of real estate memorandum Of the conract
Of TIE requisites prescribed by the staute
fraud be- tie vendor or his authorized Agent
not eseutai 20 the validity Of e eoutrc' mat there
slso be memorandum IN writing subscribed by the puf
oteser
wh,n the terms Of sale made by missioner rerars
tbs, the Ices shall b- paid b. the purchaser,
the suctoeer msJ MAINTAIN an acton against such par
Camleyv JARVIS
WoonRUTs, Justice The plsluuf no the Court below
HAVING book N . no Kept no CLERK,
aud Al o BY ta' they had settled accounts
sd havnS ao proved that defendant Dad acsno Fieds.d
the the hoOs snd 10. CORRECTNESS n ws n-t er
ror for the Jucg- the July that the book
deuce de ndaut, Tar he had settled by & and
Acknowledge - correctness
Ia ths the del udant having si,cory escused
his default o. app-sraoce before the Justice, tnh
ordered payment OF costs OF sppa the defendant
having areaay P'ld he pllin'ins costs below nj.
Held that ahough the Court deem the ufiient
the plaintiff uud the period Of piyns costs 20
accept thr deudaa offer to the cost' below and con
.rt 10 a lev TRIAL
Dowhnsvs The Protection UaIon
DALY JNher' goods we're sold upon efefit OF 0O days
te Az action tor Goods so cannot until AZ
Ter the co days but II the demanded and the buyer
breach the and recovery had for tho value Of
the goods judgement reversed.
Echer vs. Gent
D,LY Judgment affirmed The evidence not onlysus-
nirns tie Judgment but would have warranted Juds
for frger amount
Paintd having cluuactrd sell and deliver % defend
sni s. CCU bncs on tie 4rth December from no, vessels
s0oCo AZ fot Of Cntou-s snd 80 90 a. Tot Of Sgh st
auded the q eco foot - Cfon.st AMI vas 'Sr want
o. room pr-vsA,ed from removing hs vs.sl % 3)h.it
h Ht 4
he would accept by Of the delay ne brkss d.
Held that tme specified IA the coatris for
the delivery the panuh haa reasou-be rns Tor tha'
pnfTo and that delay 81 day caused By adverse wind,
ana bot smoupt on 'te part OF 4aiuh 70 breach Of te
not accept the 5000 biok pautt was "a liberty to sell
theu TO whom he pleased and the defendant having
away tie = 0c0 the hfst parcel was liable 20 the plaintiff
q cir iull msiLet value
Lock Rode
Where the defendant employed he pknt'h condition
ts, tbs work should be PAID BY ysbcauon Of
sdye-t.sss 10 b. furnished By the punui - defendant
ior To ruT 50 The pnnua Iust $40" tast deieaa.at
publish tue A., rtsenent before be eau
"a recover symsut IN money for the SofS done b.
hu IA oder BY tie def udant 70 give note aad 'sits
nor pt,l lstsu tie lsg xhts VI 500 parties
tbsn.A "a Which, ~ feasn " couhietng eyi
desc - rGubt respecting hose uglt IN An 01or
BIZ Sy e ''-'-'' .a'' 'n' ''''','-' vs." ''-''' '
Mo.lArfI ! 10 "a action Tor ssinlt ard battery
brought Ia thrre dents IL does lao vita
he 10 TIE County 20 obrc' % tie gnsdc-
'on OF ths Court Tor wan VI service uPoE ne other psr
before motion % compel Gueontnuance &C. Of tho
IL b. in The power Of the p.a.oufto serve ne
he Other tei-naufs and f be do not he 'J
r,c.LtI them any beiOfe ls ta! AID may
Iuoeeo 70 several judsH ent 'sain't The after
Ma'hsw.ys rnrs.tl. e. rex.
WoosuFF J-ln an act on '1r. tOftiJas innry per
tous property committed b. ths site It being AR sole act
hT husband act being present aor a-sntnE Ineha'oand
properly joned d-Srndan's Although 90
u,-rc animals found tespa.ng the land q another
awful 4 The owner % ths ald % All them BY
o. the sprral be disoOsed u Material
qrssu0n 0uchEs ihs a N 80 SKY Of egde1cs The sass
WA oTl'ied 10 'tsrs o,si III /" iar,hst isisfn'
DAILY Jusies Upon the cal Of he Calendar The paiatH
aftA,a std colten' sLefed o. tie AAlho COlft
Rssst-f bar no stac randan u tae oei ~, made a.
thr frsctce uFon The CslantSf The Calendar "s AGAIN
cad snd ~ defendant sFgslreo. ard ne Je'tee 1ainl
te Ca-Ddsr suffered the defendant ~
fsss the actob the pisutit not being asn
~ CoIrt tie rlurii Aad ned that defendant aad
len and the Jusrce dag that he had Ociy entered
comp ant q Owed t-n % pTcy~ aB AID him
jed sueLf TIE defer, tlL Tie appeal h'-d n i1a't
lsesngtta ts -ae sooi dei-ncs-asiG taa jaig-
NIT eFToL~0us; Tat the csfsuabt emitted 20
-ef AZ 70 have the IudEu srt set sfe
O'Conusr q Bszlsy 80
~ -, ,tvi1Ify be- s.,e a. ,ses.-s,s ,hs GO q
be- owl rame tie b D 1gas n1lds OuE hH. ala b
10 o,seoas !, ilo SOW iat in-rs: 10 Bi.ey, ss44s-
ans ucfevss n,css,sr Ian zoe oss and -ft tesr-
rofJ UPoD ~A.sa sGBesa relied Jg1snsst affGsd WIKI
ysrusEchl v, Pr,z, ct a.
judgment AHMED sita clsts
DsLY Just o,-Wbrn ID. cetsrr.n-E 90 CT cgescon
nishf sld gon tbs oFiIo en sned - tas il'tce
a. ~ crrguty psrf Wtassa -lr DolFt WI hs
1T. Ifrf- with fftng lpgu sppen Ia conn4ct o.
tssfaouy prcssncs tn Wines 80 sAa4 H5l'
Is alone q upsftL O. pas upon the question % cgedGlty
s1ydsr - GoOircl.
To acr0E Doss cu-sd 4 me Diiict IOGrls 70
Ite ~ 81 YER w5->e The Pln-tf DOR eis1,f " -
cseraaEfs within thr district to J1ssice 30 j.
Ti-dct.0u RE nd~r y4ha JGtElert s01sa ths
paEte. spps4T and 20 70 tral 90 tn h@rs "thoat OF
sciS1 The declares the Js.-l.lf 70 B. utterly
Fyid.
SchusubeGE Wts-lA
Asesklan stJCaled f.oD BfcJsn % New Jtt and
tack Brsmr ths language VI ne arSss 20 sny
oLsr which az D. o. our f1rthor
v.ve.- a.r.ctet TIE vesss. ss~-f0rE then %
- syres r-tmrbed " Newton 81 @1s sooa,
- eeed BGsuos y-ss He'd that 80 deterIiHaDs
l. poo 90 BGslos AsTes scep-rrEfe Vheh -
st~cts he pgs end % tn- voyage nd ma: he
rs siseh4rs kc. He'd fguhsE ths "a
scv.se %. 20 u re oa<csT Tue
RAJ could tLis ~ ols SGzea tnQEsh b. ats
szIs,d By liz ,h ppitE srre-s for Az
eCuE,ry oElF nfatiua