New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-07-11

the prtssn, rSfs OF emigration continues is cultivation
must undergo the same transfer
Here AZ least The lines has the truth British Par-
lament does not interfere hen the worked
cut old system terminating IN the common ruin. both
Of the thrifty landlord aud the needy tenant the former
being knocked down by the hammer Of the Easaaber,i
Esafs Commission. and the latter expelled by eompal.
soy emigration This reminds US Of the Old Sultan Of
Morocco Whenever there sas case pending between
two parties he knew OF more " potent agency for
settling their controversy than by Killing both parties
Nothing ooad ,eud concludes Ia f'afs WITH regard
to Tenant Right to greater confusion than .uch eons
slni,tic di,fr gfi0s y oreship The only person With
sr, right in ihe lard Is the landlord -
TIE Times seems 20 have been the sleeping Epme-
hides of the past hall century ard never 10 have heard
of the hot controversy going during all that time upon
the claims If the landlord not among social reiormers
and Comm uniss but smoug the very political eecn0
usts Of the British mi3ileclaSs Rlcario, the creator
If modern political economy IN Great Britain, did
not coutrovert the right OF the landlord rs no
vas quite convinced that their claims were based upon
fact aniIo; right, and that political economy In gen
eral had nothing DO with questions of right bu, he
attacked the land monopoly in more unaSsuming yet
more scientific and therefore more dangerous mtnaer
lie proved that private prOpletorsp IN ad 81 dls,in
guSbed from the respective claims OF the aborer and oil
the farmer. was a relation quite snperllous TO- and in
coherent With the whole framework of modern produc-
ton that the economical expression Of that relation
ship sid the rent Of land might with great advantage be-
appropriated by he Safe and finally that the interest
classes Of modern society Ii would be tedious 10 emu
merae 81 the conclusions drawn from these premises by
the RicartO School against the landed monopoly For
uy end il will suffice 60 quote three OF the most recent
economical authorities of Great Britain.
The London ECONOMIST whose chief editor Mr.. J.
Wilson. is not only Free Irade-Oracebut Wing one,
too and not Only Wing but also inevitable rreasu-
ryappeudage in every Wing composite ministry, has
contendCd in different articles that exactly speaking
there can exist no title authorizing any inddial any
IN fh.
torsbip in the soil of u nation
Mr. Newman, In his Lectures on Political Economy,
London ISL prOfessedly written for the purpose Of
refuting Socialism, tells US:
No man has have natural right 10 idad except
long he occupies in person His right Is 20 tbs use.
and o. the only All other right i he creation of
artificial law lor parliamentary enactmen,s as The
Time. would call il III At any tine land becomes
needed 70 lire aPoq the right of private possessors to
Withhold Il comes 10 an end"
This is eNsctly the case in Ireland and Mr. Newman
expressly confirms the claims of the Irish tenantry, and
in lectures held before the most select audiences ct tho
British aristocracy
In conclusion let me quote passages from Mr..
Herbert Spencer's work. Social States, London.
l-5l" also purpOting 10 be- complete refutation III
Communism, and acknowledged as the most elaborate
development of the Free Trade doctrines of modern
England.
No one may the earth in such way rs 10 prevent
the rest from similarly using IT, Equity. therefore, does
not permit property in land, the rest would live
might equitaby be- expelled from the earth altogether
... IL can he pretended that the existing titles
such property are legitimate. Should any think
let him To, in the Chronicles The Original deeds
written with the sword. rather than with the pen Not
lawyers but sold the conveyancers blows
the current coin given in payment aud for seals blood
wasused in preference 90 Could valid claims bs thus
constituted Hardly. AID if not. what becomes OF tho
preteu IF all subsequent holders Of estates obtain
I'd Does sale OF bquest generate right where DID not
previously exist II one act of transfer can give no
title, can many ... At what rate per annum DO nvL
id claims bee, me valid ..... The right 0f mankind a
large 10 the earth is still valid all deeds customs
and laws notwithstanding IL il impossible 20 discover
any mode in which land can become private property.
We daily deny landlordism by our egsstiO Is
acsns railway, aturnpike road to be made We DO
not scrupe to just many may be requisite
We do not wait for consent . The change required
would simply be \ change Of landlords. . Instead OF
being in the possession Of ind yiduss the country would
be held by the great corporate bodysociety Instead OF
leasing his from isolated proprietor the former
would lease them from the nation Instead of payng his
rent the agent Of SIR John His Grace he will pay to
an agent deputy agent Of the community Stewarts
would be public officials instead Of private ones and ten
aniry the only land tenure. Pushed % ~ ultimate
consequences claim 20 exclusive possession Of the soil
involves land wing despoiism'
Thus from the very point Of view Of modern Eng
ish political economists, il is not the usurping English
landlord but the Irish tenants and laborers who have
the only right in the soil Of their native country and
The 7imes, in opposing the demands of the Irish peo-
pie places itself into direct anagOnsm 90 British mid
dle-cass science. MARK hAkx.
The Past India % II frI-fory nd Re.uIf.-