New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-07-16
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT or ApPEALs.'...-Alslsy July -. 1854

DECfsIOss JUNE rFRM 1888.
Judgment al rned-B H. respondent against Sweezsy
md oihers appellants Wood respondent, against Iiab
te and other. appel ans Livingston sppeis X sipst
Miller respondent Brs as'ed and alO,her Admlntrstors
Nc responde Il, sgsisrt khe Iarmers Loan and Trust
t0 APPELLANTS Nose respondent against Averell appel
ispt loss resp Ddent against Jud-on appellant n dges
refp ndent against the Tennessee rine and Fire Iasu
Co. APT eabis Bailey respondent ag Smith and
another appellants Emme, receiver, &C. appellant agt
Reed, resp0r dent The People * rel Scott d-s 10 or
r. sgt the Bosrd # Supervisors Of ChsnaDgD Co pitts
The People re- Humphrey. defrs in error
agt the Board Of Supervisors Of Chenango County pitts in
error; Price ..rV'r. &c. appellant, agt McGoEn re-
pOncert Purdy, respondent at Nermily, appellant
ktictUm Public Admir-, &c, respondent, sgt Miln ap-
ellaIt Wells and another, respondent agt the sean
Navigation Co sud other, appellants Fitch. resDond7rt
agt the New York and Ere Railroad Company appel
at; Wsdwor'b appellant ag sbarpstsen aud another.
Fxrs sc respondents Olnstead Survr &c, appellant.
sgi Webster impd &C. respondent; Butler respondent
against Stocking mrleaded &C. appellant Clson appel.
Isn't, against Corey respondent Ward respondent against
Whitney and Others appellants Potter and another appel
srts against Rowland AID Others respondents Coffin. ap
pelaut against TalmaD respondent Smith Supervisor.
g. respondent, against Lewis appellant Burrows. re-
ceIver, &C. appellant, against smith respondent Bur
rows receiver &c appellant against Herrick and W9,
re,ponoeuts Burrows receiver, sc, appellant against
swift and Wife respondents Barto, respondent against
Iimrod and another Trustees Sc appellants McC tier.
respondeut against Hooker and another, Administrator,
&C. Appellants Burrows receiver Sc appellant against
Toord respondent the Sun M1t1Al Insurance Company,
appellant. against the Mayor &C. Of the Cy Of New
Y,rb respondents.
DteDp.t rer>ysed md ttai oydsref-cOsf 10 aid.
ezf- Joyce and another appellants against Adams and
another rEspond.nts Spery, appellant znst Miller and
another respondents Ogden, appellant against Marsh Ill.
respordent Leeds appellant against the Mechanics Fire
Insurance Company OF the City Of Newark Respondents
Mon and ano6sr respondens against Palmer appellant
Coon re.pondent against KNAPP, appellant; Amos re-
soopdeut sgsir Peck and others appellants lie and
another respondents, against Church appellant Durham
and another respOndsI against Pettse and another ap
pelans TIT respondent, against Porter appellant
judgment reversed and special order made-A srin APP
pelsni, against Mccormick respondent.
DEGREES Of Supreme Court SGrrOg ate modGsd-Vsn
Dtusen and wife respondents against ROwey and another
administrators. &C. appellant
judgment reversed and bill dismissed with costs Of the
Court o-ow-BlOedgOcd Executor, &C. respondent zgt
biuen Executor &c, appellant, aud others
Cause struck from 'hs Csendar-HBL piantn IN error,
sgaiDst The People, defendants In error
Jud nspt Of Supreme Court reversed and thai OF Com
mon Pleas affirmed With eosts-hcDermou, respondent,
against Palmer, app. liant
DEGREES Of general and special terms reversed with sps
cial dIectons-NOrthrup appellant against Cross and
another respondebD
sgsiDst Elmer appellant
Hi .nnsllsnt against Perkins and others respondents
rever,ed, with costs-rhe People ex red Bah
ook and otbsrs defendants in against the conms
s~ers Of BEsbwayso Of tbs Town Of Cherry vssg, eAin
tifs in error
Ro.d CON pany respopdants AGAINST Doudus. appellant
nCsAss undesie ed fucker and c.hSrS sppeant sgast
Ths Rector Church WArdeas &c. ofS; Clements Clrsh