New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-03-28
Ro,r C,rsnrn.-Yesteriay silernoou pes.
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
CIRCUIT COURr-Before judge M,vwsll.
lhArlra u C.rp-nter at John DE forrest


To recover damages, amt. laid nc $4,000. Tor
alleged malicious. prosecution Mr. Csr-oter 10 issa ss'-
20 Of Mr. D. FORREST Broadway,
il Is sad aud wished purchase farutsr- . crsfA
four monthA giving TO the clsrs r.-rvnce and selt
the srtcr-, which subsequently delvercd 20 ths
smcunt o. slaS Mr. De y. talins Mr. G g note.
Mr. C. sI.srsthat Mr. De r. some three or four vsekssk
srd entered complaint ss.ir him 81 the Police o.
fee and warrant vi. sued on hch he ws arrested. al
pref,uns Ga defence he ssht have un trial
OF the he made defence before the magistrate ssk
committed on the charse-snd Considering als, thse
the would h- tried he custody he did
cot eu,er soy hail consequently placed pusos
hut he unable 10 have bis brought 10 TRIAL and w
detained consequently some weess I'll chnged By the
Court on his personal recognizsnce some time ssr
wards nclle prosequi WAS entered by the Dssriet
Auo'pe, lie br,ns' the Preses,, sst'on % recover
IL vss understood the time that Mr. Carpenter obts ncA
the furniture that he bad taken house with y.ev -
keepuga boNdiuE house ia Ninhst He alleges thai he
abandoned the idea OF keeping boarding house account
the OF has we. health he ls The hou.o 20 l.1y
naned Elliot and sold her pui OF the furniture, and ssA
the ether part 20 Mrs Mech whose husband beiisv
wss one OF the references Mr. De eadeayOrd shss~ssd
TO get back the furniture and succeeded besve bate
suit was entered against hun by Mr. Mrs ech or
pas- and verdict gwen against him Mr. G. aver shat
w.srefusd The counsel 10 .psnna s.d the Kidd Com
RI @P'i. asa" n had insas need Mr. Dc
In det avprred the part OF Mr. Do forrest tho
he had reasonable and probable cause for making the
plsint-,hs indictment found, and the aos pvossss
entered without his procurement or consent Tho case "os
COURT OF APPEALS.
ALBANY, Friday, March IS. Iss1
No IL. Emmett, Receiver, &c. appellant,
sgt. Reed respondent Argued. Anthony l. kobsrs<sa.
courssl fer appellant samuel Sherwood council foe
sCopdent
No IA The Peopl. ~ rel Scott, defendants tn ssrs
sst the Board OF Supervisors Of Chensnso Co. PLAINTIFF n
error Submitted Henry r Mygatt counsel.
No ~. The People eS rel Humphrey. Defendants 10
error the Board VI Supervisors Of Chenanzo Co. PLAZA
un. IN submitted Henry r. Mysatt counsel
No u Martin, appellant, agt Mccormick TsspoDAsat
Argued E6gsr Van Wrinkle counsel for appellant Jse
7 Brady counsel for respondent
No ~. Speuy, appellant sgt. Miller and another 20.
spondens Submitted Howard, Dr., counsel
Nos H. 10 100, 100 H. 100 i5i and 59 struck ed under
the rule
No ls Price survivor &c. appellant AFT Mc(lown 70.
spondeut Argued. james 4. Brady, counsel os sppsi.
liant Edwad Sanford and n Hl. yr. council fes TO-
spoudent Albany Evening Josrssl
SATURDAY, March ~, isD
The argument in No H. commenced yester-
DAY cos secluded.
No l6 Reserved 10 March 81. No 10. Reserved ssss-
rally No " Res@ryed 20 March ~
Aigued. NJ BIdwsll, counsel for appellant DANIEL
Lord couDs.l for respondent
Nos a - 49, 81 ia rs is3. isI and $50 struck ffos
the Calpud,r under the rule.
No ~ Andrews add others respondents agt The Nov
Yok Bible and Coamen Psy.r Book Society add othsss
appellants Argued Murray Hoffman. counsel fos appsL
B-tjsmin w BOonsy counsel for fespoadsatS Ma
concluded at adjournment