New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-08-23
I've rnon The BIZ A, !, stands We are not I

-, Tni = 5o,ofthx, ssss of cases IN law IN which
W erd infringing ne srs bouuc 20 20 throcgh
TIE court, and ascertain where there any hc-ne ~ r-s
scr fcr defense Il enough FIR u 70 show oar snts-
positive absolute right ard that The d,-Ihs1s lonS
he at in coatrsvrnton II ihst right Snd 4 ens Is q
riunf u less ha shows upon he ie So- rNoue'
spooey or l-gs equitable shy ne should b. PER
mite - vers,t 10 doing { Up % that point daisl'9u
Go ssTd simply ini i0ging - thai Roin We nrN
rothirg kuo~ nothing al care no'h'ng OF Gooay.M
Goocyesr and his licenses psrfecilv iDmssrsL
fsve M 20 tbs point nothing 20 DO 9Th that par; o M
case We have uron orr BILL upon our shosing. ana
upon cur proofs ne, y conpesn, tils and mpe,s
made for IL uncii
Starting With this the only question then prop%Ftn as
cusssd here Is SINH yhSs sach defence been mt1e e-re
oeas this general sight Ehich Presented bF the BID
~ tie proofs and by the admission Ct he parties Ana
hat with great proIriety, wss your honors suon
authority The Court sid Esd yol not better VAT anf
"evtv the defendants say you rot entitled 20 this
rjurCt nsee Why - fron' ~ proofs Of the case
sde here. that yon are n J, eu'itled tot say Vas
avfry proper suggestion or ths sirpla reason lat 80
ssn6 IN the urt 9TH ordinary injunction case the
6-feucarfs ssy ycu c41rct have - And - ass Wy 10
They r.ven II a. bac.lse they bal hersa
from They do say ~as beo,u,e hey hti license
f. srd that Is the Issue UPON VIII propose SO "'ne
Vow + ,hev hsye license N CiATr-becsuse il they
took sry'hir from Ju',on they tJok i fon n a. TIE
aeert or attorney of ChssT-e claiming uud-r or directly
r., Ch. himself. s mu h 5 u ush Cast-a a nude
ard si- .j Tie Iso-r; lli by ol.in aoylisg from
Jr6soa icy clam IL from Chise simply t'ous Jutsen
say II e have any such license tn burden Of proof j.
u-cn them 70 show T. sui hey hive f..d suh.t'ntty
20 shoW and 20 rlse eQpy on this side ~ the case
then tbsr. no'hirg Stop modest OK original csss
~ sre eri'l, % sn r. IN, bon
The e.rersn ss,s in bis e. sing s-sun 'l that 'he &c,
ru. If re Courts az. that I trey st 'an5- sni
EEK teai II BY prcof the harden % proof i l'on
U.s. tecu.o should Rave ill ced IA our bi-hatf va
lave at ip-oVtnsn and bring 10 cur bill - enj'n tns
desrdt i Il reccsssry for "a 20 So cut the license m
fhe III arc alo tn Why the Court shotd e.;
aside thai en- the decision Of YOU honor
agrfe a. E. and VIII h Umon respect ihS Qua - al
g. uis s. n ference o. how might feel a. 10 tue L.
estv of H. + would be ny duty % dis us the osse A.
ih nh IreraTdei the decision p; Lex - Nad a. Aud
lave doah; upca tho ground upon vhi'h It Ta' us
cu.-t' 40 up, wh''. T. a. ms. A. q lte p'sa'' *
tff'o ii h i goes e !. T@rf ciY sinNe leS IT,
cilon Issy lave doubt oft Nrd canaot have. Tie
decision Understood 90 ~ this ira' 50 tl a. "a - ~
% cir tsyrc ser - i EMS unce- thId-e ~ thAt7-s
gent IS ocrcarl i n hsve So ur sn,l lc use. DO
~ W ear ;ut in sry U~oof 70 Old het ne must
fsve a.t gei 70 10 our agre- q i. Then CONES
reason phy did rot amend our bill l. ~as 81 ply b.
a. use did MT make any such Gao IS il made e'a W
ssri ia such sin ply because "ere DOT rSu
reii Nsheruy associate tNr Jenck.s cor gsetaous0t
W. were Addressing any su n case nor did your honor
CCisfsrlo. TIE ciii uly WA, they excl mel our an
D., upon the rurg 0f le Curt their hyp Thesis
Se cs-e II Is f.uit They assumed that wa had GER
tain ard Therefore our affidavit were ~, si1ssp!e
TIE Jorrt ued hat we had such th-y we're not
.cn's st" understood TIE rlirg q hs thA' ne -st'.
mo-, So 'i b. reie tec admitted he proofs IS the
putty " D. oIe-ed to introduce them q incl th.m.
Now - disY I AT this tab. allow me- ~ axe me
ri.frCfou - ieh maxi y, and whcl think puts "a
r.s,~ rrf,,.l, stfs. We never fI and ~ 60 not
claim p ,ffv have rcen-- from IN ife or anybody else
having right 20 giant ore set = aside this trial We
oi1 roe ~ these sfhcsys ard do nor nov oG r them
ut,r any ground .htt they rebut or stack ny License SCI
NJ by ftfm. Why oot Why nj w. trans oar oal -
Hey ,ls'm shorldl Because We deny that any such
F.ei - r,tr .xsied % IL claim W si1t ana meet
lfin q TIE threshold bi- cas-, Aba -av GaHenen
nynu have no such lceuse you never bad - you .lrf
.f,-e A. mere NAKED common nfr'agers only Then
WHIT an. svits fr why do you cfsr tbs tesi
nops they nay SEX This Is our answer We admit
thi On certain ccc9son urdsr cert in frau Iet lain
Of Judson, made power OF attorney 20 hm 10 E'nt
rc,usss We said that. Bat We say tbst in b,hlt ot
his de'erdut, or these d-fsni'Ds Or apy o'1er' he
frd-nnl ta8 never eXrCrted t1t por@- r0r EAad any
license rffrt We fhAi though he porer NAV have
been originally binding upon a. ~ certain faults aud
2'eos fs part ne 50 paced himself tAA1 oeofs ne
ear Oh Ger /. hsd p,wcr 0 revoke that p9 YER aud did
revoke 2 Then Ne are not here with bil clNncg on
or side that Ley have got license under rs ald having
such h being obliged 10 sne I'd i 70 70 along WIN our
eases hG' here denying "a - any uc9nss ~ he
fefnf anfs -, ing Simply that did on certain oces
sion ule power 20 Jud ON 70 grant csns@s 20 those de-
f-t danfs hr that neither lie nor they ever saw Il, - at
under H. 70 LICENCES granted and va revoked orr
rover II attorney before any act could arise under Il Thh
N'u.d mi re- OK ~ ct anybody else. lac geuuehen
you'd not p-tsrd for q moment that We have not sg1t
o. revoke That pog,r II = license has been granted
urdar hat power IF the power was good and valid ori
,,llv ana license his been granted under Il, then
iiat ut stand against u.s. uJGaion was mads or A.
tfrs, ~ erstt lcsu-'s and Licenses we're granted 10
iht.e 4. atts erds our Add WAS surprised
-tef-ufu Of The ali ~ and learning ofths counsel on
tie Other sfe did Lot yak directly up 20 THIS int IN the
cae ~. met f ~ men and as llw,ers Why tas ddg
Ing and ID IL talking about equi3 p!eAtngs we knoT
srfff ~ Honor oftquty proceedings on one SIDE
cffie case WY III this smutlns tie lse over IN ret-
ton 60 ruerd-1 tiis Come 1fecy 10 Che lint Nth u.s.
ST. ludseu cid hgvs authority 20 grant Licenses ton
Cf4c,e We agree q th.t fact hut say he
f ouf- ihat authority IN his ii that he never did
vecuf. H. sad tieref The granite OF that pDSer does
not ane u.s. We say thing further: ittley attempt
e. st is up a. power Of attorney - 1t9solsn n,
stsndus power Ct att rneywe simply SAINT these aida
W.. IN reply to II without alleging it in the bill Judscn'
is rtify IN this case, O need NOT be-
Vow what | hive sa'i thus Jar wiI be sun i-nt an
cr.atd u ~ ihs TAX he part OF the ce.enss.
an rot -re ssyirg that show 10 This clss that there
l. 10 such cer ST. that they do not shoE tht h-re ~
Int srpy 20 have my case on tbs P.nt va, ta7.s s'a
license or ia. 'ier- not lsay t-r, ny bA 10 81 /
vented ano if Dad ndsd I gou.f b ave aneniei
u7self Cuf f Cont. lay ut our proc ar5 III want
T. r. p.r'rfty imnatrral for The purposes 81 THIS tih
vi-briif lower of attorney IS r.yo k-d not unless
d. Las oti.d Hrdtr T. Suppose ~ s1oV my common
n III yer u be- rlunty .ud be- bow thsf ira good con
Iteration L er y has the lo".r - grant nc,nses.
Tt-r.zt question The e. mt asks l. Has b. granted you
o.ef b BE- Pas ra sou ere coGin'n lItn1g-r II ne
VS. ,ir ne party hls claim agal. yJu' tryol ar
al-ir urctr nis Fiiy. That Is his Then We
III y h the gentlemen The O'aer .id- - beg the
question nd .rgue ~ 70 H. UT . meet q a4l ~ "hen7r
tiffa wss lr was not lcsrss. AID 'Asy ara too
y. cd la4,cr. % deny that tao tWdtn 81 proof %
ui,nt and upon nooo ior Pf-Ih.i. ~ w NOUN
va, have lro,f am ware ih 80 M ~ Ater D. ~ rt'el %
H. souId discretion II IT, Court bat a. cuad l1S 40
crftcr = covered by ucc rgI ina equtio7 rules
s.f., In fh. h..h ro,iteu WHOM your Honor ocolpesi
,,ucr cuy lLd fate BY hs rules Of ag kno IN to the
ueagt. sra practices Il Courts Of JuSeCe and you must
Small ~ IT, ordinary WY, e. viz; By PROOFS In tie
cs.e. are d p tt-d 70 an in incuon ~
TIE rroOf " make the her ice can, or can not sue
o.ssy defend tie Application upon tie Yr9osthsy 70 re.
We siaii 10 any sher tribunal upon ne n OF sny
ese hen having case 1din2' md pr0oiin every
r1liru D. hey enswer us by s.ying "e nave h'else
tf..r,ra They mu.t uroye THE burden IS upon
fsr, 'I.tra can b. p colbt of T. They say that
made rover ofai,omey % Juts1n, and 10y say that
Jc ID lated them license by viE,ae q ihis pox ger Of