New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-08-03


| pay for one day
THIRD WARD.
ALEH.sDER CROssLrI- The respond4n Il charged with
dsobedience Of orders which ia subtsntsed BY the evil
dence The Of the respondents -nrely nsai 'en
anc therefore ordered and s1udgsd thS the respond
ens be and be hereby suspended from pay for three day,
FTFTH WARD.
JAWS G. BURSHAs-Tne respondent is charged with
not soing DUTY when aEOks by the doOrnsn IL II
sewn on the part Of the respondent that ~ OVERSIGHT MN
M tor about an bour and then and vent out % LOOK
after bis section that he taken sick and hsd 70 oe
brought back to the ststonbouse by policeman The
conduct Of the respondent, in not going out % duty Fasn
he~A Awakened cannot be justified. and fJr which NJ
should be severely rsprinanded We DO not deem II
necessary to continue the suspension and Il hereby re-
moved.
JERtHrAH FowLER-The respondent is charged with
not going bis beat on the 70 ult II ID evident from
the testimony fhl, the respondent did not understand the
order and that BE- acted under Misrepresentation This
complaint Is dismissed
sIxrH WARD.
DFNSIs MoCAULrr. the respondent. is charged with
neglect OF duty in not answering 10 his name ro bat
be has sho ths, he taken sick At the time aud
reported but the Lieutenant would not receive his excuse
This su' pension is removed
BFRStRD McPaRLIs. the respondent is charged with
neglect Of duty in taking twenty minutes to get mp and
attend FIRE The charge proved. aud shows that h.
exceedingly oisiory and therefore ordered and
that he be and be hereby suspended from pay
one day.
JAMS GtSGHAs ia charged with havisg abssntei him
self from his beat without leave which charge provs
and admitted by the respondent whose excuse is insult
and be is hereby suspended from pay for two days.
SEVENTH WARD.
BEsJANIS HOBBr-rhe respondent is charged in the
having sosented himself his beat without leave The
chas proved and the offered by the respondent
is insufficient It's therefore ordered add isdudg-d that
the respondent be and be hereby suspended TOR one day
EIGHTH WARD.
STEPHEs CHAsBERLAN The respondent is charged
with having shsented himself from Station )use DUTY for
the space three hours The charge proved and
h. has heretofore teen convicted OF neglect Of duty
awarded and sf1dged that he be and he hereby sus
pended from pay tor five days.
JOHS WiLDET-The respondent is charged with having
cohsbted with and enced away the daughter of Sarah
Brton. The charge founded the atiay made by
Sarah Briion in which is narrated series OF fcs Of the
uost atrOcous ana revotiog character, all OF which she
alleges under 10 be true On the part oftha respond
an attempt made imoeach the creioty Of the
complainant and irsdic the statement made and
fer this purpose the daughter Of the complains PLACED
the stand and although she ss-eut-d that OF the
statements inside BY her mother false yet she admit
ted that the respondent in the habit NJ cOhsb,iny with
her bih before Ard after the birth Of her child thus in
feet sustaining the main part II the hlrse sds by
moher The charge proved in all s substantial f-s
and shows that the respondent is NJ. worthy Of
place in the Department and It Is th-r-ore ordered and
sdudee that the respondent John Widely, De and he
hereby oi.missed from tn Police Department
NINTH WARD.
joins CrsICE-The respondent il charged with having
refused arrest persons in srpt % tbs 4h Of Ju
IT, and with having by his conduct encouraged th-m m
their rt.us and d,ord-ry conduct TIE testimony shows
hat man raised pis,i eyeled it though about to
fire in the crowd and h. the respondent Thsu called u0
refused 20 arrest him that a-rgard he arrested two
riot. ard took them the sdega ak AMI then let them 60
aud that serward he ia different parts Of the
crowd dong noihDR apparently toward suppressng th-
not On the part Of tn respondent IS snOwn taat ne
the sase the ime the rioters engaged in
hsar the driver and that owing 70 the Of ths
rioters Impossible for officer to m ke arrest,
thar he did make arrest and took ihs prsoa5r to the
u ie G. mt aud that NJ was sren enieavorny 10 keep
thu crowd back We have ven this most careful
con,id ration and have arrived At the conc u,on tina,
thou The respondent did d. s1me.hlng on the Gee Al
referred TO- yet that HI general clnfuc Vas u1i-c'iys
az that he exhibited indiposrn 70 -nter z-.ousyn.
to the combst he sho1l havs done ia the thiu DIS
charge his duties And while We do not dean nsc-s
afv init ~ extreme punish nent allowed ny law. vet
vetfik il case that .4ls for penalty /. Is
therefore ord tdaud a. that the respondent be- and
he i, hereby suspended from paw Tor thirty dsys.
PATIi,E kfLIY.-- The rep nden i charged With hay
ing on ith of Ju last ouri riot. ordsrel two po
cuer who had arrested two dl-ord-ry p-r.ons y-d
IN the riot 20 1T their prisoners 90 And ht he a,er
ward took prisoner from policeman Bryan and f5chTg.
him from custody. Il shown by fhe testimony that
policeman L+ferts arrested rot-r and that ths resppn
dent ordered him 10 let the man % about his business
that policeman Faust arrested another o'sr and that the
respondent Told hun 10 LIT the prisoner gviag tn
ctman sshoye saying a the time tla he would not
have bis countrymrn beat That when policeman Bryan
about arrrsfing r0tsr, the po1d-nt vent up 10
him ana showed hin away ana when called upon - d. MS
duiy be- es.d he but did not take bim 20 the Pc
ce Court au1 that NJ W., aft.rgard sg4i in get
ting 2 r0.er out % the way, that h. could bs
rested On the part of the respondent snnwn that
wher the riot commenced he actively in
That he ac-utly rescued the
the mob sid drv his stage away Ihst NJ ~ nan OF
good char ,cr faithful In tn performance Ut h du y
We have carefully considered fh- evidence "a tn,
and athosg general rule, icentn does not 4ct
wisely make arrest when extensive riot j. going
or the expression made use OF by the r-spO0d@at
shows that he 4oiused sy other motives than faith.
fl discharge Of his duty when he directed hs policemen
q the prisoners 90 An officer wh-n engaged in the
discharge of hs duy should know friend, country
man b, should GEEK by al means u .naiu the uorel
Acy Of tbetE-. matter by whom dizzy ar- Vi t'-d We
esFsr III tn. IND he INF
f punishment take into consider III ~ the conn-nd.
condrc' Of the ponder AZ the Of the
riot l. = There ordered snd sdglg-d that the resoon
dent be- and be is hereby suspended from pay for thirty
days, and then hs be reduced to the ranks.
ELEVENTH WARD.
PkTRICK BARRY The RS DOud-ut j. charged with hay-
ing been nfoHica'-d while du'y The charge rests
tirs The evidence Of Capt sqpre who safes that "a
cOnversng u h the pOndebt, Who ~ the tune
ageo Arresting GisOTderly persons that ne
somewh.t urder The influence Of liquor On the part Of
The respOuc .h0gn ha' when he vent Oat duty
he hao eigns 81 liquor upon hun and that he
whe OF his beat that b. h-d signs II liquor HIM
- that tine We DO nor think t'' me charge - suoIn
ised b. the evidence, as The TX einen under WHICH the
r Dordent lab0nng vhen by Capt Sl1ires nay
ben caused in great degree by the attempt 70 arrest
The di.ordeTy Jndsr the crcunstance Of the
case he proof being sntcienty explicit tia,
pant must be dismissed bat 2dmOnsn The respondent
hat should similar charge b. sub.anystsd he will DO
dismissed IRON the department.
TwEIFrH WARD.
EDWARD Y. GRAHsM-rhe respondent. ia charged with !
rect ~ duty IN sbsentfg himself from duty rom
- 10 sunset without leave The respondent alleges tbs
be- urderstoOd from jor Dyckntn that the ,yoc had
gwen bin leave Of ah-ence BAT this positively proved
y the eyideuce the responds al applied th- Chief
oi Police, through Mj,r D. for leave Of absence ~hieh
vas uostvey refused The of-nss vas wiiiflly con-
nied ard the respondent deserving Of severe punish
nent this l. the third against him within
short space Of time II = ordered and ali dZed that the
spood-nt be ard he is hereby suspended from pay for
CnAEIIs HALlEcK-The respondent Is charged with