The Camden weekly journal. [volume] (Camden, South-Carolina) 1853-1861, 1853-04-26
-s,.. - I1rslis, Camden Journal.
That Regular and BnsiIless-Fikc
- Statement.

=
I -1tr.s5 IEll11z7cn-I -Instle Lancaster Ledger of
tile I3til inst, find communication from Mr..
Nj. Boger,of the 4ateSfrm of Boger & Reese,
copied from the Salisbury Watchman, which is
in reply to my former remarks. II is only to
correct Nh" Boger iil some two ofthree wrong
statements, he5bas;made, that Iamjndueed to
write second time on this subject He has
not seen fit tostake etbes advice I5recoulmended
to hinrn. my first piece, ,&on;hc would have ill.,
formed hin sell better on several points before
he came out so boldly again. In the first
place, he states that sall their Philadelphia pur-
chases last fall, were consigned to Mr. p. L.
VilIepigue, Charleston;" this say is moi SO, for
Il have duplicate Lillofladins in mYpossession
showing tlrut the lG Packages pcrtlre schooner
WV. Fulton, were consigned to the Railroad
Agent.in Charleston. Now if Nj. Boger will
refer to his Bill Lading again, from which he
copied 50 extensiyelYaip in his reply to me, he
will find that Mr.. vilePigur's name does not
appear OH, it. Secondly, in trying, to prove
that they paid the expenses toeCharleston on
the l6 packages per schooner W.:aaIYss Fulton,
to Mr.. McNair, in sChVaW, goes onto men,
ton Several amounts for expenses in Charles.
ton, and then says, ""about ttis time Mr. Vile.
pigue answers that 1924 was fortl6 packa-
ges per H. Weston."p : Now, sMr. Bigger will
perceive that the l6 packages which Air yille-
pigue meptions.and received pay for: was by
different vessel altogether, and the anotset of
his Bill greatly over that Of mine for the l6
packages per schooner w. wv. Fulton; and
defy Mr. Boger to produce any document TO
show that he has ever paidthe Bill but once,
or to any other Agent but myself AS Mr..
Boger so insinuatinsly challenges Mr. Vile
,pigue or myself to make out a '.'regular-and
busihess;like statement, so that Messrs.; ;Boger
& Reese may know what all those Charleston
charges We're for" here goes for aeduplieate of
the Bill Which T furnished their Agent, Mr..
John Rosser, when T first delivered him That
Same "hhd. sugar" .,.4a.s i = n s,s
Messrs. Boger.& Reese,
1852. To South Carolina Rail Road Go. Dr..
August 2ad, for postagejon Bill Lading
-: =. from Philadelphia; a5
p: 27, forspnssage B.lL. from Phil. 05
Nov. g, for. freight, on l.hhd. Sugar
.@,.se4;,.s. -f;om Charleston, 2.s3
Sept "a, :" freight to Charleston onl6
: ,-y packages per WV Fulton 1855
9" !" !" Drayage >.5.<.: 2.13
8 Z" g.. {" Wharfage x ssz ! y. -. IS
." q :" -zss g postage on Bill Ladmg to
t. g. z Charleston &; ~ - 05
1855 Jan. IL, for; storage at Camden
on !. hid. Sugar, -l.so
:, - =, = =; - =, -, ~ sl5.4l
Received payment per John Rosser. Jan. IL,
1853, ..s.!...sa,. N. D.. BAXLEY, Agt
Twould here remark that I suppose Mr.. Ross.
er retained the original Bill as 4 voucher. In
Mr. Bogers reply to 3Justicc's" second com-
munication, which have not had the pleasure
of seeing, he speaks Of 'four or five wagons be-
ing sent from Charlotte to Camden for maehi-
nery," and that they were sent back empty,
aidsrequred to ''deposite five hundred dollars"
before the machinery could go, and of the trou-
bic they had in getting the Bill mSde' outs and
when they did, it turned out to be less than
tsthree hundred doliars;a and that this swell
regulated Company, or some person else, had
the use of several hundred dollars long enough
to make handsome speculation" Now this
is all news to me, for if my memory servesme
right, there has been no such Transaction here
since this has been Depot. Mr.. 'Boger's re-
marks on this subjeetare so general that am
at loss to known who he aims the blow at;
whether private Agent, the South Caroliua
Rail Road Company, or myself; but if'lie had
given the date and name of the manufacturing
company; would have been able to say some
thing more in my defence.
N. o.. BAxLEY, Agt.
0r1@ ID, .~,-