The Democratic sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1852-1853, 1853-03-09
''Look out for the Locomotive
when the Bell Rings

The contract Tor the grading and mason
ry of the Cadiz Branch of the Steubenville
and Indiana Railroad, has been awarded to
hessH. d. C. d o. n. Salisbury. who are
to have it completed by the first Of Scptem-
Der next. The Messrs. Salisbury are push
ing, energetic meu, and will, without doubt,
have their contract finished againstthat time,
and perhaps before. We are glad that the
WORK has fallen into such able hands. We
suppose then, that We may calculate on
having the cars running to Cadiz by the LIST
of October. What do you say, Mr.. Prcsi-
dent and Directors of the Steubenville and
Indiana railroad? Shall it be done?
1t will be seen by an advertisement Of the
company, which may be found in another
column, that those who have subscribed stock
10 the railroad, land we wish there were
double the number, and double the amount
of stock subscribed will be required to pay
the first instalment by the lst of April next.
We hope that the stock holders will be
prompt in paying their instalments, as the
company will stand in need of all ihe funds
they can procure to push the work rapidly,
and have it completed early.
Eg"The following decision of the Supreme
Court viii be interesting to,a large portion
of our readers.
Monday, February 28th, 1853.
Jremiah Woo ford, as. Tie State Of Ohio.
Error to Harrison Common Pleas.
CALDWELL. j., Held
/. That where the clerk Of the Court has
placed on tie margin opposite the several
counts the numbers, one, two, and so on,
and by mistake or otherwise, has commenced
the numbering on the second count, and the
SAINT error has been continued through the
whole Of the counts, and the jWy haze re.
turned II verdict Of guilty on the seventh
and eighth counts, as marked, it is an error
for the court 10 sen ence the defendant, on
the seventh and eighth counts of the indict.
ment, being the sixth and seventh counts a,
mar ct.
IL That where the court have passed sep.
arate sentences on the defendant on tive
counts of an Indictment, on one of which
counts he has been found guilty, and on The
other of which he has been acquitted, and
have llade the sentence on which he was
convicted, to commence at the expiration o
lis term ON the count on which he was no
convicted, the whole Judgment must be re.
versed.
Ill. That where an offence forms but one
transaction, and the Indictment containing
several count on which the. jury have re,
turned IL virdict of guilty, it is error in tho
court TO sentence on each count separately
Judgment reversed aAd cause remind d.
Mr.. Woodford was On Saturday last adj.
mitCel to bail in the sum of $500 by the
Probate Court Of this county, for his appear
ance before the Common Pleas Court OF
yesterday.
Eg" The March number Of the U. States
Review is on our table. This periodical i,
published monthly in the city Of New York.
by Theodore A. Foster, and is deyo.eI tc
the exposition and defence of Democratic
principles. Its articles, both political and
literary, are characterized By unusual abili.
ty and force. A highly digniticd tone per.
yadeS the entire work. We deem the work
Indispensable to every democrat who wishe:
to keep up with the accelerated movements
of the day, and who would be fully and firm
ly grounded and established in the faith.
Address Theodore \. Foster, U. States
Review Office, 25l Broadway, New York
The work Is published at $500 per annum.
in advance, and is sent free Of postcge.
We should be pleased to receive the Jan.
uary number, as it never came to hand.
The following letter of Mr.. Foster to the
Richmond Enquirer, will explain itself.
To tile Editors Of tile Eoquirer.
NIcnMoND, February 70, 1858.
Dear Sirs:-Rcpor.s having been ~circula.
ted that the United States Review, publish
ed IN New York, was a. mere continuation OIL
the Democratic Review of Sanders, l,eiIle Y
& Co., | avail myself of the columns Of YOU,
paper to refute all such assertions, and State
Il few plain facts.
The United States Review is an entirely
new publication, and is independent of all
other journals. 1t was projected and start
ed by me. | am aided in the various de-
partments of the work by gentlemen o.
known ability, to whose articles in the mum
bcrs already published | am not ashamed to
call public attention.
The United States Review was not estab-
lisled to oppose the Democratic Review, but
rather to till a space made vacant by tie
strange and erralic course pursued by the
last named periodical, by means of which i
lost the confidence and support Of the great
masses OF the democracy, and became the
organ of ID small and inefficient clique. Had
the Democratic Review maintained the es-
tlblished principles Of the party, the United
States Review would never have existed
There would have been no need of its exist
encc. 1t is not my intention to seek a quar-
rel with the proprietors of the old Democrat
lc Review, but TO conduct my own in such a
manner as to make it a reflex Of the opin-
ions and an advocate of the sentiments Of
that great party, whose teachers were JEFF
fcrson and jackson, and whose actions have
at all times rejected lustre upon our com
mon country. 1t shall appeal to no section
al ~prejudices, and advocate 10 f~actious fanat-
icism; but, be based upon the broadest prin-
ciples Of nationality legitimate Dcmocra-