New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-04-28
SUPERIOR coURr-Befors Judge Boswosr"'

Action for alleged seduction OF daughter o' P'''""''
already rei yGGs M S sat the Hudson Co m
The Company insured, ON l7thJ lcoS 80, 'a.. IA
Gerry stoc liquors and fixtures Of Garson DESTROY
IL Christopher St ON goth April the property was ssys
cd by fire claim was made the Company Tor go
%, the smount Of alleged loss The COMPANY a ;,n
ed hy Hennngs to plaintiff. The prnciPai po"" ~ ~
Tense is that by clause in the policy the use Vi ~
wss prohibited in the store but that liennngs was
constant habit Of using camphene as ight anu '
used the night of the fire. which rendered tue poy
void Verdict tor plaintiff SOFA being amount win in's.
subject the opinion Of the Court As to the clause
relation 10 camphene.
Isnahu. DebFoveuja AL. Jacob wednst. ~,
To damages for alleged malicious prosec""o"'
already referred to. Verdict for plaintiff $3.50
Antoine Boutels sst N. U. Tompkns
Defendant hired TO plaintiff in 1850 ON lease ,or n'us
years, public house known as The Magnet Az soVV Syc4
Plaintiff intended altering small building IN connecuon os
the purpose of oyster saloon but he alleges ns de'e
ant suggested he should cree, instead three story ooH
building and he would extend the lease 10 years further
pay plaintiff for the building. new agreement was drawn
up with the renewal mentioned and defendant u y ~
legged said all right but did not execute 1t Plsinun
went on and erected the building but he says def snant
afterwards declined to extend the lease or pay Tor he oa
ing, and action is brought -,
In defense the making of the orignalless was sdm"ed.
but Mr. T. the defendant says there was stipulation fT
plaintiff TO the small building He denies that he ever
agreed to renew or to pay for erecting new puus LII"
case is on.
Before JUDGE OAKLEY.
Herman r. Tmme and Eliza bis wife, ast j" Biser a.
For alleged assault and battery. the person OF MS
T. Ii is said defendant and three other men, came TO tho
jewely store of plaintiff No 1852 Bowery on 2oth OF jane
1852 and while there assaulted Mrs L. Action is brought
TO recover 6 900 damages.
defense said that defendant is officer OF POLICE.
detailed jefferson Market Court that quantity OF jew
ery had been stolen from j. C. Mckinney Brooklyn by
lad named ---, and there reason to believe II
had been sold to plaintiff otherwise came TO his posses
sion and warrant placed in defendants hand to pro-
coed 10 plaintiffs store and ascertain the fact and that
Mrs T. vile he there nerfered with defendant in HE
duty and he her out of the store he had Alright TO do
II also avered that most ot the owey was recovered
witness stated that defendant took hold of Mrs. i.
pushed her of the store into the back ROOM where she
fell upon chairs. There dispute, II would
about paying plaintiff back what he had paid for the
jcwelry Verdict for plaintiff $50, which carries costs
VIM A. Wheeler and Thos ID Doubleday John Ne~bouh
To s26l4 amount of securities placed ny plsin
tfp together with time check for s2O00l in the hands ~
jeremiah otchkss in security for loan OF $1,000 which
loans and securities placed by lotchkss in the hands
of def ndant Its alleged that Mr. III charged plaintiffs
s7G for said loan for ~ days being ~ per day They claim
that the whole transaction. therefore usurious and
void and seek back the said checks and s~cur
ties or that is allowed the amount of the difference
on the securities
In defense was said that Mr. HOtchkss applied de-
ierdaD broker OF plaintiff for the loan, and made
him the pledge of the check and the securities that
the check protested for and after due
ce and offer to return the securities the payment Of
the loan, the sold II Is denied that there
any usury exercised the part of defendant To be
tnued