New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-08-02

4
| a----. -. ~ Tho clause 81 ,he Ccns,itauor
snnne~ ~ ~ seA iS,o ~ slaves lnNt snnS
Nss,,,r ~ the Asmers ut tNe 'Nns',""u" -,
49, Isssrs, AssN iiN% hNe 49,, - "a mat .n,,
,rede ~. ,r'nS Understandings @ sac provision '''
=! wv e.u,ss cf the Constitution had Thought r.
W." sSersss mtrludN peIs'oS ooanl 80 oor,ons
SeNs'W t..pA that Vs. Spprn.ic.s am'nS we, 49,,
tswt" y y. ether hand III Nes Ncfk sn''ndsu r",
Save -, and SO eA NA,l had deemrd ne's, - -,
50 .,,,xpi them tNm being in'ene" =" a.,
| y esSS As,a O. service ot labor 'Nee
sw =, same construction hsd been placed upon ','
49,, al rr,,y,sNn IN JAcs Vs. hNr'n' - "euu' -.
"a ~ spd IN lohoss" vs. E'm@,s,Saer. lnser.,.
~ - 49, S,aV,M ~ aud u~tAht
NNh" -. ,,,,s appreuiic,s 60 he wis'in the m'An'ng
ssS % ,s| Cxnnissioner Morton. N. w. has
Nstyer De- ea 80, -, valid In ,hi, Court bec,u,o rs
,,sn,,, ,Asy hsd been imphed'y rsiihsd by the
- '" hD,Sn.A wh,ihcr ratified or not. they we're
- - t,e 90 ~ sNsfftfss (>tory Conh l., 81
49, t.1 a ~ scc los. y 1871
$50 Nv th~ apprentice argued That this was not
uNsrs ne Commissioner Was authorized H. issue TIE
,rt q, srrsi neither the CrnsiHoi'n nor the acts Of
- -, AZ hcng intended ~ ahcOi any other thsn
- n Ss,ry Ccr>t seq 81. I'LL II sec. s05 S-rg.
So lsx 1T 81. Sc. SIS III Mad. Papers. ~ !;
~ "A RarnS. ls rc;. on ei sell and that TINS was
tNss .rs,iVri, Nv the tact there sdui'c Ned
se.sted spgre n',oeS % be within the Cons
.-,. ,se G. 81 i-2S Sud $50
,tiNp slaves were unahla 20 make valid cOn.
rsS lsleea Y tlres'S. johns, O., Conn. v Griffith.
- IN ms hOy Il hrou1 III into ghc same category
80 rxs. s>c b. held incapable Of validity binding him.
yeAe SSmSaS sud therefore the father right Wa sa-
swEr. .,-.
.n.,a Il i6s l2s On the subject
fTs,, s,sA the father c these indentures OF
- Ne AssuS never surrendered hS rghts over the boy
.ysks. { / 10. $50 I ) and X gu; , w. and ;.
: tsOihrir Murray, Watts, SOC Commonwealth W.
s,xx,ie> M am ), $50
- fr TIE csimSnf. sss not heard.
~ IL have hSd my attention ssled TO the clause
.ls Constitution. sni the Al % tongr-'s OF l'S and
ii nv, Ss for the rendition 81 p-rs rs held a. labor,
4 ts uoes u cong very often aud hs result o; tao
ts heretofore bc>tow ~ ana thu sinpe nSidre OF ths
-ss.sa 70 be decided induce me - give my decision
- Tskirc gh- woris ot The c~dse IT The Constitution,
- tA,.e e ;ae A.; of 1850 alof t. there can 0s dt
,,Ae words are persons held 10 service or labor
-. SS'e uud,r the las thereof Nos know of no
,,-< ia. could more Gle y cade apprentices than
very eeu@rr 81 apprenticeship are 20 hold the party to
<-vs an could g beyond The words OF the Act "
'usrtsS Snd those o. the article OF the Con iiuilon
Aoc v hSt every consideration OF policy wOul1 iicaie
= because 10 a.. iiv the contrary would
s 70 eistsrge every apprentice Ia Pennsylvania that
- 10 crss DvNSzrr Soo Every one elseEhere thai
s,i- "a his State and refused 20 return 10 hi, duty
- = S,or created oy Al ind-uture OF apprsnceshPis
sroh lSrsCteS that minors AID OTphaas lnote.d y
szSining gaorani and unprotected become acquainted
h The AT. Aud sciences sud htted tor the duties o
- al e1ifsdnon should De applied IL il true that no
Sse hks been ci'ed IL which taied States Court or
ssge Is. decided this very qu.s ~ but perhaps IS
the n,ser has enforced his rights Oy seizog his
5rrsu.ic- ard cpnve log nm h1n~ that this a8, aud
II o 80 IA. Dot been res0red and the want OF u'e
ror-Ess "a, NJ Wtlence upon the construction of
sin expr-- seo stsiuie
1, Is equally clear tina, though Judge in considering
= case Il fugitive slave in crnrexion with he Hut7,
isA spesk only Of slaves wihin It's parview, and an-
Ia case Ike the present, might speak only o: aP
snices vt each might with proQdety use th7 words,
rtrSoa hell 10 labor L. is ca lY ID be Obser sed
:; tie words Of The constitution apply only 10 slaves
h; eertziI Is this lad is held by budng under )ct
needing. within the authority OF any State 10 OvGe
Z HEREBY - affect persons wihiu her lin IS aud su1sct
~ jurisdiction. The m4rrag- Of a mOOr IN De.s.r-
y by the aW Of that State, would be good every
= Now OF The Objects OF apprenticeship Is 10 pre-
- psV pesisn sid child who's parents ara in smother
< distant al, snd Sh have de-ert-d m is pau
soiE star cling the fact OF his having Ia gfd protect
sbo Let osclsrge their duty 10 him. and the sp0
"a OF BIN unOer municipal regulations of the Stte
yhch he IS deserted, IS bihGlng ON him aud his |
Vs1s toe j. cannot however. Dr. sad, that IN this
- til biudiig wss agNn.t the fathers viii, |
,rt iu prof before me that w,h the 81
sft-5 who sent his to DolAwtre GA tr.l to bs
sro he Tx q, ana sent n back TO that STATE At
Be uuC, ~h-r, on- ertsi ~ he had abscOnd-
lts on. s'iuu, therefor IS between the father and
str q, fai. proof aud il c.Inot b., that tue father
~ aud SEE bis soa bonrd IN another 81 Ie T.
GIVE and nurture, snd ist when no bs.O mes
lssb'e to = master, 70 t.ke hd. ag~y such ooar,e
oslo sucnri 20 positive fraud. Ine consent IS so ie
hat J, not gong too far To cay, th.t slave should
re heIs With his master consent and olnd himself az
snhce o. ben. here, SHOULD :" bud himself wth tns
siers ccussn il the drst oAst 10 would not b rut
e slave within the meaning of th- act OF Congress anI
TIE second the master would no be- allowed 60 question
validity ~ the in1rLtIre Tn therefore, returns
The Commissioner FIR adjudication, he being pos
sion Of ny on the subject
2sAor rvinsndec to the custody " the Marshal.