New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-01-12

fine Of eor,issna ~ T~sty pbste-p icfe, 80 :,
doc 70 tie party 6s, Ts,sse ~ s'ici trtac '-T',
% the Unled State ~, loe.sce~e9 p 49, ~ NJ
s}Tssada or the pfotcCtion 4 tfs fssst,. h~tN1
.ed that should The pipposiien - rsiecye =.
the United States q the lssi tnaoerss vsach ~ -
might secure 70 them, and confer ths 10Y = $500
beDs bfst among the nsious 10 couslu8 a - sfs
ment upon The government either ct Nfes = 80 y
France That either Of these govcrnnanf. wsa ssahsss
The offer cannot well be doubted beesuso fe des 20
peer 70 BE- any otb0r eaeetaal Of ecasi us ~
nations the advantage Of tss Important pAsssEo bsi te
iSs susishhy great commercial Pqwofs tssi 'sS
ahs world At stake are 20 important hat the
security OF tins passage between the two oceans
ssfions hch may arse among oieren; naons ne s1s
sess thst tbs Treaty with the Government OF Nicaragua be
have good 70 believe that France and Ras stand
yesay eecode 70 this Treaty and that no other great mari
vi calculated 10 dAuse blessinss % peaee eaeres
"a CIVILIZATION and 20 honorable al nstops which ma
eptsr into Tho engagement tsignsd) Il. TAYLOR.
WAsmseTox. April 2. 1850.
Mr. Csyton, writing 10 Sir Henry Bulwer April 9 1870
S..xs he presgmes from the nature of i-s
100 prepared 70 agn il. He informs nI,ser Tat in
s.tsubsr 1872 when no hope OF this Treaty wa enter
ssd 4 treaty made with the Government OF Siesr
xfieb before the Senate for its approval He sovs
yr,,sy now before the Senate who are the Presde,s
sr in the matter; He doesnot think the President win
s,ovsf snythng the Senate shall do IN the matter He
~ no Doubt the Senate ~ make the Treaty with the
.yssosn Government consistent IA terms with this. He
cssss 10 the happy results 70 Cow from the Treaty &c
IN Prlwer replies 70 Mr.. Clayton under date April
receipt Of the draft Of the treaty as pre-
~ MT Clayton for signature He calls attention 10
R potsnt deystOns IN 1t from the original text of
ssssf submtted 20 Lord Pslnerson for his approval,
4 important that IA the present sltust on Of the
pI no further time should be lost the conclusion
sEsn - to alterations have been adopted BY both
OLE e. various reasons, whc5 have appeared expedi
3oD he fanherance OF the objects which the treaty
ert " he was prepared 20 ign it. He expresses his
- - apy other treaty connected with the subject
fet occupied the Senate before this bat his conf
% IN tho Judgment and ability of the Senate end also in
rr<ntending wisdom OF the President assures him
, IN be ratified, that nothing will be Put INTO IT
s..,v 10 his understanding aud engagement with Nh
ssc He recprocates the cordial expectations % the
Sxt result from the treaty end expresses ms foica-
- n having been connected with Mr.. Clayton IN these
useeassons
a. senate May 8. 1880 the President transmits two
,s.,. between Csyon and BulWer, showing thar there
- no foundation for suppOsing Chathed had made any
800 vih Costa RIGA ia behalf the British Government,
"A bst The English Government had no intention Of max
ipr any fuch treaty -
'9P.,ed Two-thirds of the Senate eoncuTng that the
ssste DO sAvse and consent the racg OF the Con
ssnton between the United States Of Auerica and Her
Britannia Majesty concluded at the City of Washington
lprl 10, n D. 1850
~TE.s-Iiessrs Badger, Baldwin, Bell Beren, Butler,
ra Chase Clarke Clay, Cooper COrwiu, Davis Of Mas;
nsvsn DAYTON Dodge Wisconsin Dodge, Iowa Downs,
1skb Foote Miss; Green, r. l.; Hale H0ustOn Hunter,
1s,ss Iowa; King Mauguin, Mason, Miller, Morton Nor
- Pesrce Pratt Sebastian Seward Shields Smith, SOue,
Sr,nance Sturgeon Underwood, Wales, Webster-E.
SEIys-bfesrs Ateh SON. Borland, Bright. Clemens, Dl
Ma Miss; Dickinson Douglas, Torney, Walker WHIT
torh Yuee--H. 49,.
So he Convention was ralihed.