New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-01-28
SUPERIOR COURT Before Judge CAMPBELL.
Jared. J. Kirtlapd at Moses Wanzsr snd others.


in notes made Dy SctOnncH & DfOther III
hvsr Of wanzer Co iDd0rsed 70 Cromwell CO.. iby
bsu bdorsed plaintiff The defense s that the nskers
bsso ing embsrresssd sppe alton male By deendsnts
70 pisiDtf stating ts; defendants had opportunity
ssre themselves plaintiff would deliver EN- the note and
teSeTed h the amount but he did not II 70 them 1t
Sssended tia, such ODER absOyed the indorsesi aao
TAI tbere notice OF protest Verdict Tor plant h
~ a, subject 10 opinion Of Court
kntsneie L. Crawford sst The Mutual Ite Insurance Co
~ - ~. C,,,rd for ~ hps Of plsis In
6sfsnse IL alleged ta the policy obtained by Invalid
Assns In saying that Mr. g. vas not Shbced with any as
eese tending the shortening Of be tins being 18th
Nov, 1851 and calling 10Th Dec. and paying the pre-
aiu and receiving the policy concealed tie fact that he
ksr hand II vas contended that whatever said the
&AL Nov and hst tho agent on 18Th Dec GA
Esssg nc policy stated IN sn'wer Question: eas' MI
Il appeared that Mr. Crawford Who wa, leather dealer
- 8crrees was at store 10 Which az agent Of tbe CON-
saes 90 fh Nov is5 Mr. G, being a the time W robust
health the agent that he would have h life insured
united exs'nuation ss 20 he health The premium
cseS los ~ tse se9, "a DEC ~ and
70 70 70 tic office and pay the pre- mum (szi 90 Tor SIX
ontls) and take up the policy lie went and paid ths pre-
MUM and receipt but The sseut bad the policy with
him. Mr. g. called az ain IN about two hours, when the
agent had returned to The OH and the policy delivered
70 Ms Previous 10 lie delivery the Cashier remarked
that be Understood Mr. G. TO which Mr. s replied
that spPears he bad been attacked with an acute
bowel dsessc and died in about three hours after the poll
~ delyeTedhe being In dying state II contend
cd when the policy wss obtained
The Court charge, mere seemed d0uet
that everything had been fair AZ the time OF makns the
sgyeeDent 2h Nov, 70 insure and evidence that
Mr. o. did not intend IN tall faith carry II out aud when
called for the premium sent 20 the Office. Tae Com
DaAy not Obliged Their 10 raify the agreement
% far the law .concerned OF even 20 have delivered the
policy focci wing the preinr bat the hav
Ing been me time before whea Mr. c. was ia bellth
they sht have injured their reputation by refusing Amer
delivering the policy they could Get rid o. T. unless
they could show there had been aud II there hal been
any eoneesneut Path Nov, fraud might have been
made cut bot II win be for the Jury say whether there
bad been any Dec 10. II there the widow csuuOt
recover, Otherwise she Is entitled verdioiTe jury
without leaving their returned verdict Of plaintiff
Of ", rec, bcine principal aud interest
HaTfitt HARRISON ADM SC. ngt William aud Il chard
Lake
To recover sa0l. the amount Of premium gwen 20
the Pelican Insurance Company, VA 1871 for Insurance
yesf Tor eoooo sehf Sc Mary The defence ths the
pehcy contained clause that rendering the pro
amount time before the year shsud b. eaasd the
defendants rendered S2i2 aud demanded return OF the
noe but Il could not be given them, the Couptny had
pssd the note of 20 Jusice Hanson who Ia the
Dloymeut OF the company, nr previous debt aud that
Justice H. knew Of the circumstances The tired
before the Court, and Judgment reserved
Before Judge BoswoRfH.
Emil A Stern Marcus III. Lochcnsten and Y Finch.
Quantity OF isoss were levied upon by Oicer Fuch
execution fer sS8 against Joseph Folk dry goods store
occupied BY latter No l52 Aveuae A. Plaintiff claims
lave had mortgage the stock and 60 $500
the alleged value ~ gooda under the levy II sdeaied
that Mr. L. authorized the officer tske the soods and t
also tended that the mortgage not bona Ode Sealed
verdict