New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-05-31

communicate with Brother Pease respecting certain ssPcr
] siors at his character.
Objected TO- and the witness directed h eop6ne hn,s
20 the dispute between the Quarterly Conference And Mr.
Pease.
A. That there were steps taken by the Presiding Elder to
settle that differ bet the Conersn y aud Brshsr
Peas As Committee Of three appointed a. an
by the Elders to wait Brother Pease and expl.a I, hi
tie ard have the matter settled At the subsequent
Quarterly Conference thy reported 10 the Pressnx 81
der snd presented written report, together With soaas
verbal statements and in the report they stated thsy
bad filled to adjust tho matter.
q Did the Presiding Elder state that was In error
A. No, be did not
O. III " could he suggest the appointment OF Commit
tee TO convince me Of my errori
A. The Quarterly Conference considered that there wa
an error In Che accounts the Elder did not say Brother
P,aSe as in error but the alleged in the
Of the Treasurer of the Board OF swArs mpntng error
and 10 communicate and explain the matter
O. Did YOU hear Brothsr Bangs in the Quarterly Con-
ference urge the brethren to settle The matter ancaby'
Brother Scudder again called.
Q Did Brother Bangs previous to ms presenting the
charge request of you Brother Pease and see this
affair could be settled amicably
lie did; he m.de the requsS. In the evening se re-
turned from the Quarter, Meeting Conference IN second
St. ard slso the morning he urged the matter agnn
ana raid he wished very much that cont os settled or
or that Brother Pass woud have to be broas 10 trial
Question by Dr. CGrryDid he advise you % tell Booth
tr Psase to given them all they asked
A. lie dd not nor did he suggest any mode II settle
ment
O. Did You not hear the Elder advise tho brethren 10
drop TIE matter where was, or to 20 and seisle
A. Ne. Sir
Nr Perry wished now to reply the charge of violating
the Discipline by allowing the prosecution to sum up last
=. Did brother LudlOs sLmup
A. No; he excused himself from speaking.
Brother Floyd was called
q Did brother Ladlow make any summing up
\ My recollection Is not very distinct; he said lew
words be made no speech-certaiply no argument.
Brother Nash was .hen called Leave was given brother
Luol. speak by te Presiding Elder but he excused
himself No means used by the Presiding Elder TO
hiss my mind against brother Pcsse previous to the inyes
igatoD
Brother Foyd asked the same question and respond
Cd in tie negative.
Dir Perry announced that he would not offer any mors
W mony but leave the in the bands of the Confer
ence lie offered the Charge of the Presiding Elder The
entire document argument prove that there could
IN Justice be only calculation made for the year IN all
ohuh5s and that should be the Conference year aud tho
practice should be uniform otherwise there would be great
injustice preachers would receive pay for twenty
five months IN two years and other preachers get but
twenty three This Charge admitted part of the evil
j, nee IN the
On the motion Of DR. Bangs the case was now laid
TIE table for the present and the Appointments taken up
The following announced as tie Com ntees FOE
Examination for 1854;
For Gist ycsr-Duriel Curry Biblo Doctrines, W.
SPOUT ys,,aue DsrYi I'ueen n Looms S"nao" h'ssa'
Henry u Latham, Competition tsaayf ocrnoie
ycdy Edward Gswod the Bible Sseaments John
NJ Reid System'e Divinity Noes Hill Chnreh Governments
TA6d ,ear Foy Bible History and ChronolosyI wm.
ucyt Systematic Divinity; Edsn Jones, History Robert NJ.
Hsitcd Composition Essays, sermons
Perry Divinity Moses L. Scudder Preaching Compost
Delivery Of sermons Thomas a. Osborn Biblical Critns
John Juskip, Composition. fssys and Sermons
The Conference here adjourned TO o'clock In the oven