New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-09-12
TRIAL OF BISHOP DOANE.


Tie Court was opened yesterday Saturday morning
chutctls
Or Friday, Bishop Dome made the following points the
main ground upon which he based his argument the
ton 10 quesh the ITeseniinent
l. The Court in October 1872 efFectually and fnayby
order and decree disposed OF and dismissed the sc
ii The third prosenneni is identical with the second
and therefore in lis dismissal the presennent before
tie COur il dismissed.
not IN the second they bound by the Interpretation
given by item the Canon last year allow the Diocese
TO which before they referred the then unnvesgated char
The sroocb OF Bishop Doane was powerful effort, and
his argument managed with great ingenuity and
Alter the responding Bishop had concluded bis argument
in favor Of dism sing the pesonment the Court took
The Court having reassembled Bishop McIlvaiue from
the presenting Bishops took the floor for tae purpose Of re-
plying to tie argument Of the respondent.
After adverng 10 something contained in tho address
previously read hy Bishop DOane from the Convention of
New Jersey a. IL assertion that the Presiding Bishop had
concluded TO make the pending presennent the day
nfcr the adjournment Of the last which, he SAID had
OF pre- xnaon to the truth and to the attack upon the
four la.n whose complaints the presenters lnyestSat
ed in which notice he expressed the entire confidence of
tie presenCrs in their suicency in point OF Standing Tor
the places they had occupied compliments tothe present
crsnaintanng that the question OF Their character had
ven no bearing on the present lssne as the pre'eniera
kere the accuseIs before this Court.
The Bishop divided his argument into three heals, but
only got through withhs remarks upon the first point the
time Of the adjournment.
The action the last Court stated being urgei
IN lar Of further action He showed the consequence OF
admitting that position in the future discipline of the
Church since that action claimed as final consrac
ton ihe laval admitting the e1vQl right of all Do
Conventions equal 10 that Of Court Of Bishops ID
lie showed the difference between a jadgmsnt of n
Court after plea and inquiry into the writs, aud given
oordng TO the canon and new order OF Court without
any such prev ions action.
order of the last Contributing in more than ira OF the
% ncns of the Court TO that effect while two of the
eight who voted for it in their opinion expressly sai new
pes, ought To be made and tried AMI third had
entered on the record his protest against the whole action o.
the Court null That there was not majority for that
action is conclusive
lie aruod thai twas not IN The power Of nch action t.
b, the Court because il was not Jadg@sai there was NJ
fcI orlloa 1.-THE accused or inquiry into the merits
BE contonded was uncon tuiona beennse the ON ar
ice Of the Constitution provided that the General Goa
vtior ar ne should provide the mode OF trying Bshop
and tie Convention OF Ne" Jersey ia lii moi
of lis own and ousted the mode Of tn General SOnyen
tio and because the General Convention provided that
nc but Bishops should try Bishop and here PfesDyer.
and laymen lad tried Bishop ana cam 'ha' 'hef al
Bishop Mcliyain resumed his argument on the remain
i, two ,oint this morning, and was stu speaking when
we IN Camden. Bishop noane viii reply t. Il m ana the
,ed oue>o, e trial or NJ trial VIII then b. decided by
vote OF The Court. 1t is not likely this consummaon
vil be reached before Monday.
a. lc,e is variety Of opinions in reference to the mo
tive. Of the presenting Bishops we copy from Bishop bur
cess address 10 the Convention OF the Doce'e oil Name
VIC sdsy DE h Friday he 18th of October was in
.r1ar m
n ana az sars G Burlington for te -Ta4 oi ine "a Rev
ior 10 ne Of Ntv-cTs. under pfesn .h M ,y ths
ir , Bshops OF rgns and Mel aine OF Oio TO
wi founded upon IN beoe e nf Ger
80 of pccc1e OF NcwJersty y "as called 20 ac "a
lca ohraoer 81 hop OF this fch aud not oly IA in
IN .i,lry place he upon record bl d No
rr,r Il with deioera los In naet %
o-,te myself o
ccuc ion. 70 which ih spp35 OF my b,l
~ ,a ef3 a. az. strength which could 20 b. Ieve d by
heir dsaprfog The cOsng Oiipnr cen m Ap u-I
Cd hv ,c ghI thai was no. under ts n S
called the chire Is ooC''l
tes Oh oiscretion leaving uEdec ded the iEuh OF a
and establishing ced rf OF ~ mo-
onseruerces could not In jude ael Ions ana - nm
t,of cdi1g more necessary
uent been; and accordingly conc ~ "a "a
rfIr nj the ta on which appointed ~ oesH On -Na
l., 0i Sci tclhcL'