Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1853-07-22

the specific grievance complained Of with reference 10 the
Holy Flscss actually removed, by the admission OF
Prince Aerchc himself before these Interior demands
put forth all To assert that "al the means by
which the Just claims Of Russia could be peaceahy adjust
ed have been tried in van Is direct violation OF the
truth. for In far the claims OF Prince Aenschikou
just tangible they adjusted to his own
satisfaction and with the concurrence u our own Ambas
sador.
'rhe stubbOrnness Porto" courteous express
sion towards Power with which the Emperor Nicholas
still PROCESSES not 70 be at but in this Instance What
he pleased call the "stubbornness OF the Porte
other than the deliberate conviction Of every statesman in
Europe and tho concurrent opinion of every Power n
GLIDING Austria which has not hestAted to express
that conviction with energy and ccnsfancy that does
her honor The Danubian provinces to be occupied
pledge for the re-estabhment Of the rights Of Rus
is, under any circumstances whatever. But where has
Russia shown OF her have been verthrowns
She talks Of binding the Porte to observe soemnly the
iuvioabty Of the orthodox church. But how has any
immunity Of that church been violated threatened with
violation We weared by the attempt to thrash this
chat Tor argument fact when contains neither
the the other, and reduced afler ALL to
differences drawn altogether from the absence
OF reason But let any one compare the arrogant and
utterly unfounded language of this document with the
temperate and almost submissive OF Redschd Psshas
last the Russian Cabinet in to its demands
and will be impossible doubt that when the Emperor
Nicholas talks going forth fight for the orthodox aith
because Turkey In her blindness and stubbornnes desires
to Cypress il, he either words without meaning,
he eontempates actions which none Of his allegations
justify.
The important consideration attached to the manifesto
is not however, its effect the OF Europe, but
the subject Of the Russian Crown and the members OF the
Russian Church, to whom Is directly, not exclusively
addressed There lies, fear its chief danger To
people and priesthood like the Russian arguments and
proofs of public Law Of small value in support Of the
Traditional desire and their claims spiritual ascendancy
with full in the Of the Almighty shall
20 forth 6ght for the orthodox faith, tho words Of
this manifesto, which will resound through the Empire
IL IL the cry of crusade raised among people who
still OF the age Of the crusaders 1t is appeal
timcnts which rational Government would excite
less it is prepared TO give them amount of satisfaction
which, in this instance, Rrsis command until she
has dictated terms only the Porte, but every in
dependent State in Europe We assured by compc-
witnesses shat already the feelings OF the Russian
public iufamed that ST. Petersburg the Govern
and surprise has been expressed the articles OF Ian
guage still employed to temper and qualify the publish
ed declarations OF the Government But the opinion Of
the pubs in Russia is very much what the Government
allows it wishes it to be- and conceive
Seghty and grevous responsibility than that Of throwing
fresh fuel on this smouderug IRE.
Paris July 5.-The BHlotin de Parifof yesterday
ming notwithstanding to dispatch received to day, the
Journal De CoHsaninops declares that the of
the Russians into the prncipaies be considered
declason Of in Turkey II that truly the opin-
ion of the Sultan and Of the Ottoman Empire the ques-
lion decided in the Of war for Turkey alone has
right decide II that invasion is bsiii and in
that case her allies bound to give, certain cond
tions aid against the enemy This declaration o; the
osrta! dc Consdntiaopis, has not however produced
any great effect, because IL required TO be verified"