The Texas Republican. [volume] (Marshall, Tex.) 1849-1869, 1853-08-13


..o h.. .>.r advocated, which Is not 'tiie'
I, d, ,ceordance with the drmocra'ic 'A''"
-. ,.,, il ha. condemned that IS moi d'
rec,ly contrary to 1t. We spoke o, v
" a.hugtons having read from Tue WV
T.lseraph. aarbled extracts hoa the wa
ting. Il Mr. Madison, Nj Monroe 'enef6'
lack on. and Vi Calhoun these eN
,,..,.vrfe intended to show that these dis
tineurhed men advocated the poiley o. ]"
tefnal improvement. IN the s'a'''' ne
,,f.,s,ce Ia be drawn from them as pre-
septes b, the Telegraph aud e. Washing
ton. vas. that the Government had the Az
,h,,,t, hy the constitution, to construct
internal Improvements. ia other words u
construct roads, aud dig canals, ana TO eA
orei.. authority and ownership over 'hem
AL Of the statesmen above named held e''
tirei, different opinions. Gen Jackson, 10
Ia. ytto OF the Naysylle road OH, sass mat
Congress csnno, construct works oi inter-
nal improvements in the states, even OF
u,,ioaal chafacter, when It would neeessa
ri, nil, the ownership or authority over
tn. .cl which the, might traverse, but al
the an. ,n. they might grant monty to
,..i.,in such work. / be- Inference Is vs.
~ plain why thes. extracts we're tins gar
bl.d They werr intended, oi eoufsc To
snrpet Gen Ru-k'- bull, and 10 s"t mp III"
defence that he had not departed from the
democratic faith. We were only surprised
that cur IyIer friend htd not quoted tom
that sac Of the Telegraph, "a which l'm
ncnY. ~ defending ten Russ'- bill. ono,
ed the reasoning oi thief Justice Marshall
ia support ol thu tonstitutionalty o' the
[ ) Banh Both o; these questions ean
only t.e sustained hy the same logic. But,
he .s,, ,ha, b. ), opposed to the ,ucorpora~
tion -atnre in Gen Ru.k'> bill HIS oppo
.iitor 10 n hls speech here was very Zee
bic, sad be treated Il as matter ct 10
consequence. As Gen. Eu-k had sah he
did ut care a snap Of h,. finger Tor tins
rLu4. be ua- satisfied There are other
equally objectionable features IN thi. bill
to which he offered 40 sort Of opposition
Indeed. II III. sprach was not intended for
defence of the bill in question, we can
sa,l, assert that it had SO intention what
ever
WY our Tyler friend should have thought
proper to lng in the name of VI. : | Wig
tall. h. card. we are al loss to divine.
Mr. v as he wells knows, has not now
nor never had, any connection, either d.
rectly or indirectly. with tins paper. Nheth
er VI WiglaIl Will notice the remarks OF
&. Washington, We do not know but As
he hss sent ia no communication, we pre-
sumo not. &. Washington mentions bot
one point in Mr. VS. speech, and takr,
occasion to Irisrepresent that bis We
attribute to his bad recollection Of ee9ts
dufas hi. stay IN Marshall What W uu
.,....,.l II, Vn,c.lI. .,y,a nm. that
a.. ~ ,.u,.,,o .,,d. tho ,,,.rr.J inn
provemeut report, rs Secretary OF war, to
IL. A. ,.'.t......o.,,,4 ,,,., ,.,...,,,,,i,r
.,..,l... ....l...,o.j /, ,.,oI,.J
..'.....,..... ......,,.,,, s,,. ,h,,t.s,,,
,l.,.,.,.,,,u, me- that he N,r vs. himself
,,,s mara .,,,abl. of deciding "A. To the
con.,itntionali,y of question Of thi, kind,
than lir Calhoun was when he made that
reper, rhc re,.oo was this. when that
renpri WAS written. the Journals aud debates
ot the convection that framed the ronstiiu.
t;nu. ,yer. a scaled book. |, WAS not until
l,,,, ,f,or tbat,i,ne that thcy were publ.h.
ed When they appeared many provisions
which were previously obscure. were rem
derad plnin. and uo one could longer doubt
A. n the mowers which we're Intended to bp
cor6lad Ia the General Governmoni. It
womb he seen hv reference to the debates
that il had beef proposed to give the Gene
raj Government the power to dig canals
AID Open roads, aud the same Arguments
were then hseh III favor 81 e'"n'"s wv
power a. are now advanced 10y TIE federal
g. u a. Of