Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1853-05-13

T,t,sl u,
par'mrh ~ ~ d hrs, In advances the interests OF Rich
MAN.. AMI they take the liberty II Suggest ha u more tnh
n i apronttd The number siond pc a. a"eu az p"ssoe
% yr.rs,s incurred bv thu. committee IN me discharge
;, u,;rs oununr Ia the al SUD ob an account 0
which i, herewith submitted That sum 'as pee pu'1 upon
The ,ait al The Chairman ni the c"nihee un ie Cham
bcrIuin uu OF thr Sam at 5Ou appropriateness ' if''
and niadr SUBJECT {" snch dra't. -; o,, \, f.o,,.;
ni,s OF wo of the charts Of The river mace ny captain
Stansbury which were obtained ny s NM If ,h U' ,nn Wv,
Department Washington and PRIME" copy ~ 'e 'pp'
o Cant Srausbury appended to The pt"cae'sS VI me
Virginia CouImrrcls Conven"n hrln IN 'e'eue io'!
ma herewith re,ua ned 10 lie Council 10 hc hltd win iis
report they may be again seiVlceao'e " ' ~ '
of the Council on this subject
All which is respectfully submitted.
A STROKE OF POLICY.
We guess they are relieved o their regrets on UNI, score
by this time Judge Caske had spec,Hie" VI W. c
mans ability TO debate win hit ." ,a rh nain Inri,
line Cour that he will forget shortly. INC pam 'usa
farmer VII learn made the fur fly from me snulp IN
ddae and came oil with flying cnlors'-l h'''"0 rug
We Thin, with The Wing that is decidedly the best treat.
mrnt for Col Coleman lie needs patllng on inc oA'"'
little faery due modcum of harmless praise u"u '","
netting to get him out fairly upon the stump gu nm no
fights bravcly; that the Judge s n" matc' ' nm ~ ~
rr.mc,,o,cd wi, ana osc-read from fools cap on the
slump 10 The people, after smart nlon'h'" u
oroesta,ons of being pecdy called 10 address mem
,,r enoisbinp TO his antagonists; and he will venture
ou b,dly after while II The Wing papers VIII out gel
h Ine IN discuss the issues Of The canvass win MS
comp,or they may aud his efforts 10 the sevenlh heaven
FIR NIL the contradiction will make 10 them "r' "U' ou'
Of The bushes; pet him the stump lhats AL "e"u"'
--sssp--------
The Wig represented having stated tha co'- poS
"was brought gu, by Wings exclusively" We have mol
been able 10 find where when we ever hsen sue" "
rressiou or made such statement. If we have done SO
the publication in our columns OF the call upon DIR h'y'
BY citizens OF Pulaski, Montgomery and Wylhe among
Dan,
m,,t Among tho "Democrats' who made The call upon
cal Hoyh was Mr. Daniel II. Huge, OF whosc c"huuc' III
Thai re ard correspondent: Of the Wyteyillc hepnelca'
writes rs follows:
TO the Editors of the Republican
I'm oukin. over your last paper, my attention was u'"
10 a correspondence between Col lhos j. ooy" uld
nunbrr OF gentlemen from the counties OF Mon'got,y
Wythc and Pulaski in relation 10 Col hs anhounSs
himself GA nddae Tor The office vi Commissioner " W
lie Works amongst which observed, WIN eohsue'no'
urpr;sr rather pressing letter invitation from one W
Daniel IA Hoge This Mr.. lloge, il will he rcne,'prIe.
wps candidate for the Judseship and mol having oee ID
vI viii very hateripg ' from his constituents, mas
imagine ever that good hour been ON nc''es no. o,
with himself and good people OF The Cirrnll on' INST
The resi- Of mankind For mslake ho' S".
Ihen very Materially altered his yiews upon various CUES
Iiuns il has occurred upon reflection mar his SAINT
Mr. Hu.c was lrarmiy in favor OF making me
uli,nl contest but is opposed 10 elccng Coinmissoh
rr of Public Works upon those grounds HIS Is sln"s
and il Inconsistency Is ~ ior recoec'
there aust be something that hurts Mr. Hose' iee",
ask land II can inurln me please 10 SUI h"2 q"
onn.ed 10 The election Of The Nominee OF the late Lynch
'u's De"'0' 10" va INQUIRER
pS exc, edngy regretted seeing The name1 OF Messfs
Spence Yns Brow and Johnson accompanying Its cor
iespOndeucr. These gcnllcmei however oeing goou e
oc,as will trust before the 26lh sce-wh mat retufs
of conscience consequent upon repentance inc cnhsl
mate folly al opposing the election OF Mr Danle--"'o "
the choice oI their parIy
CONGRESSIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE ST
| COND DISTRICT.
We learn that after session OF two days aud se'eal Oh'
Iongs Tins body Nominated yesterday, MIR "h " oo"p'
@, Mrkrhurp as the democratic candidate Tor the Secon
DISTINCT The nomination, after The last 0aNou"s
was mad. unanimous We Learn that the umSs
good feeling pc, The convention dufng It's whole s''
ling and nomination was cordially eoncuHedin an
will be universally sustained by the party We congfaln
LATE r Guod uEOn and have no doEh' lu' |!
vill carry The election with 80 insy II be.
The Democratic Vigilance. committee Of Monroe Ward
viii m, e, Tins cycin" o'clock, al the Shockoc I'LL
Tavern; ami the Democratic Vislnce committee Of Maii
son Wand will meet Ihr Enquirer office. We earnestly
appeal behalf lnsl cause and our noble leader judge
Caskle who every way worthy Of warnest aud mos
Jealous sutori that full attendance may he present
| and Thai l,rr cgunssls and deliberations may be &"
verneL by concord prudence aud wisdom, S" rs 10 NEE
our willy enemy the Wings, tmo work through the se'fe
agency o Wig club fair uni equal TERMS on inc -oti
If this mouth And lei il be remembered until lie Jay
election by The Democrats this city th, Richmond ma,
The battlefield where The victory may be LOST OF won.
the NEGRO SAILOR CASE IN CHARLESTON.
The decision in the United Stucs Circuit Court in the
District in the OF Reuben Roberts vs. Iere
mIah D. Yates H. VIVA. every familiar with The prnc
pies Of international Law had reason 10 expect The appeal
10 the Supreme Court will probably result in confirmation
Of the decision below Indeed, if we are not mistaken 'h
principle The aw has been already recognized on severa
distinct occasions hy the Supreme Bench lie question
simply u.s. whether State has right to order It's nierna
affairs In accordance with it's views o It's own interests
or whether liz municipal legislation and protective policy
must changed accord with The caprices OF other States
modified suit foreign powers IL has frequently beer
established ly the British Courts and admitted in The lgi
Court Of Parliament that such legislation Is entirely within
the domestic sphere o each Governments, anu lha' oe'
have M right 10 Interfere.
We believe that The present suit is brought really by TIN
g,l,ish Cn,enment against tie State Of South Carolina.
They ale the real parties the Reuben Roberts
cuorr, man. and jeremiah D. Yates, sheriff Of Charleston
only the John Doe and Richard Roe in the Tn
object vi the action is 10 the question u The validity
legality South Carolina law which prcscrbes that al
cnloed entering the port of Charleston board
any vessel other than vessels belonging to the State shaI
be- l0dp e gau immediately Their ARRIVAL anu there de
tanned until The departure Of the vessel from whicn they may
have been taken. OF Tie consutiunaly Of this law I
hav doubt South Carolina il free, sovereign and indie
pendent State and may regulate her internal pulley in sIcl
manner size deems requisite for the protection Of her
Interests and for the preservation al her safety
tranquility. OF the policy vi the law may reasonably
doub AMI perhaps il would be Iudicnus abrogatc
ifs it, after having obtained final decision in her favor
which there is every every reason To anticipate.
The law in dispute has excited much discussion agitation
and opposition since its passage II has often been al
lurd aud frequently denounced in the English Paia
| ment Tile British Government hus persisted in efforts
accomplish its nbrognton. Much correspondence the
subject has iranspircd between The British Consul al
Charleston and the Governors Of South Carolina without
results and The institution Of the present suit is the ultimate
action in Some years ago the Legislature OF Mas
sachsetls dcspa ched the Hon. Mr. Huare 10 South Carroll
ma and Hon. Mr. Hubbard IouisinnH Try in The Uni
ted States Courts Of those Districts the validity OF the
but this direct and presumpuous intervention OF another
State tolerated 10y neither The emissares at Mussa
chus-Ils waited upon by gentlemen OF Charleston aud
New Orleans In aivanrr Of the action OF The Governments