The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1853-03-03

vor ,,eesec = letters on your r. other in 1a. lsaSs
esns objection. :ne rsh.g Ss.ilss questions were put
where you in July 1882 Objected 70; obestoo
over u)ed and exception taken A. In Rochester
Do you remember What occurred IN that Ooatnr s4scs
exception taken) A. don't think Of any thing O.
bd you darh that month"; receive any ette from any
cannot ,ay sir @ Do you remember anything that oc
CURED during the month Of July, 1s42s Collected 10
sne objection sustained Q Where were you in June
ls4lf A. / WAS at my hon g. in Rochester; am sure
was. Q lurins the whole nonth9 A. thick was,
sir Q. Are You sure' think am Q DO you re,
member anything that occurred In that month"; A.
don't think Of any particular circumstance; could
not ,ay. Q Had you any visits from any frendsS A.
think he VAS could say all the month; could not
say received any letters 9 Where were you during
month Of
not all the month, but nearly If memory serve
right left at the latter part Of the month, and
two brothers my father remained at Rochester. o. Do
remember that you received any letters that month
think received letter lsttsrs-f did one was
from my sister that is all remember; may have re
ceived one from my brother tine defendant When dd
you those lettsrsY A. About year ego, during the
your letters togstherf A. Yes Q When did you sspa-
rate the you produced ON Friday from the
sspsrst. ~ A. received despatch from New YORK
atkipg me to send such letters or papers es could
70 h1 the date when my brother ne came tho, home
could not tell think it was from my brother Q. When
did YOU receive tH A. could not tell the date without
You q New York; A. Yes. q Had Your brOshe- been
at the time you received the depatehS Corrected
TO matter the witness could not have snewn Of aer
taken) A. did not know. @ Do you know now
whether he hadf OBJECTED to for same reason.obee
timonv in the paper after received the despatch cannot
say whether 1t was before left Burlington not. q
Was there not paper sent to you or any member o.
your family containing that testimony, or the test
mopy In ony FORM which you before you left Bur
lngonY Have you the letters from which you sepa
A. believe have; think have not the inside Of
them. O. Don't you know whether you have or nor 4.
think have not g After receiving the teegTsPhis
despatch how did you to New York; A. Think
started from Burlington the same day received the dos
patch and brought those letters with me; witness con
days and three nights after she left Burlington when
she arrived in New York and stopped at her brothers.
He was at home and she gave him the letters and con
your brother recalledf
Objected to- assuming that she knew when her bro
ther examined. Collection sustaincd)
Was your brother 70 examined on that trial after
you arrived In Now York. and after you had shown him
those letters, Objected leading hearay evidence
only. collection over-ruled and exception taken. A.
If recollect right don't think he went on the stand
after came to New York think It was in January left
Burlington for New York with the letters cannot give
the year without seeing the despatch Did you see
any Testimony Of your brother In the In which he
corrected the date from 1843 to 1844f A. mean,
sir did any report Of his testimony in the paper
Mr. Chatfeld required direct answer ana the defeA-
dants counsel objected to repetition OF the question
contendng it assumed he had corrected his testimony,
which not shown, and that moreover 1t had been
The Court over ruled the objection, and noted the
ceptien.
brother when he corrected the date from 1s43 to Sf
A. have II in the newspapers. O. Was that aftsr
you came to New York; A.. Yes. Q While You wore at
youI brothersf H. think saw the examination IN the
papers, but can't say when where saw them first g.
How long did you remain in New York at that inef A.
thai going on after you Gamer A. think saw some
thing about in the papers after came Witness con-
tnuedDd not 60 in 70 hear it thought her brother
was 1T home part Of the time she here when they
came 70 New Yos. in ls4. they lived in the Sixth ave
written by her brother to her, and Was genuine one
when she said penny post, she meant the express.
Mr. @ ss :." r.
One Of lettcr from her sister in August and
another from her brother in July The family lived In
after their removal Rochester three years ago.
that they movedto Burlington when she said she Was
two ns ena ,hs soas iii the thew
hut she could remember the precise cause she had
come down during this trial and got here In daystart
ed in the morning and arrived 1t night.
Calista Lofty, another sister Of the defendant ex-
leaving Rochester for the FIRST time
and as rot here sunday morning be. eldest
(Wham) came with her; he wrote the letter produced
on the following day T. her sister the last wit
duced the one 1t dated 9Th Of August 1874 her
brother then lived at q Aaedougsl street.
the day your brother got TO Rochester A. think IL
was after the Goth. Q. Il that matter Of memory A.
ness continued attending . lecture with
her sister the 18th Of July had never seen her brother
until he TO Rochester at the latter end Of had
recollection Of anything particular occurring during
the month of July in other years. 1s4s and 1872 did
not know where her brother during those years.
never received letter from him before 1914 to
New York year ago with her sister to the Forrest trial
case; was not at home when the teegraphc despatch
came her sister came for her 70 wangford where she
was staying SINCE Saturday she had not seen the
telegraph they proceeded Monday by tyAh from Rut
land and were detained on the heights BY now drifts
Va. about he second OF third week in January she
didut know when but she thought the trial ended on
Monday, and they arrived on Tuesday morning. thought
M. Oark-The verdict was given Monday morning.
January 49,
graphic despatch; did not know late IS 70 the
9Th, but knew IL was the day after the trial
verdict but her idea was the whole was concluded.
Robert NJ NdTidge-was o Hshmonger in Washington
market knew Mr. Doy for seven or eight years 30 far rs
lie knew, his general character WAS good
Cross examned-Meant he Was good man-an honest
man; judged from his knowledge and what he had
had heard Capt upper speak q him a. good and
mic steward had heard several other persons spesk OF
The hour Of adjournment having arrived the Court
I'LL Tuesday morning
TWELFTH DAY.
MARCH 1One Of the counsel employed for the defence
having detained at the surrogates Office this
Ing delay occurred In resuming the proceeding
On the arrival OF that genssn the hrst witness called
was
Mr.. Alfred c. Smith, tailor who Examined by Mr.
Clark deposed-that be knew Mr. Doty and had known
him fifteen years; his general character was rood.
Cross examined by Mr.. Chat6eld-Had known him all
TIE time sew brn, except when be was awsy South; be
went away In and returned home again ne
about 1914 he came on here In the time that
In 1Ell. IA nu6f have been late in the summer
early In the fall O. What has been the character Of Mr.
Doty since the trial OF the Forrest divorce suitS
Objected to the ground that the question was the
character at the time Of the commission Of the alleged
offence. man might be charged with crime and test
ony enough manufactured 10 six months 10 bscken the
fairest char aeter ever presented
Question allowed, with view of testing The witness
accuracy. Exception taken
A. The opinions Of people 10 Dotys character
.isce then seemed 70 be Influenced by their prcudce In
the Forrest usft.
Horace whitehorne-Was engaged In the clothing busi
and had lived In New York twenty two years had
known Doty twenty six years knew him In the country
heard anything against his character till that trial