New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1853-05-27
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SUPERIOR COURTS cGlNurns-Bofore Jpi


THE TRAINER CASE.
in the matter OF Jane Trainer whose custody claimed
by its father, &c.
various counsel and parties were presen-aso IS bsfre,
large number Of spectators fnR -
Judge D. on taking his seat ysaIked that he should be
compelled although Qgwillngly 10 postpone the to
Saturday aussaying been broughiup "Wednesday for
argum bslorc the General Term which viii occupy AT day
vest ay and part Of today, and which Is necessary To
LIS heard as the General Term viii s after 10 day
On Saturday he devote the day 10 this matter besides
which be is DESTROYS Of asking Miss Porter further
questions ms 10 facts in regard 10 which be IL not fully sa
fed Mr. Culver said in that they might desire also 20
question her. as facts may he brought up which
they should have opportunity Of answering nquirng
into Tie Judge said certainly any new facts are DIS
closed the counsel ON the other side would have fall right
to examine in regard to them and they please bring up
the testimony.
Mr. Booth said they might on her behalf also wish to
have her testimony IN chief The Judge said they might
they please take such testimony.
The then adjourned to Saturday.
HABEAs CORPUS.
Louisa Nichols sst. Thomas Eehola
BY the mother 10 obtain the custody of their two child
rem Louisa and Thomas about 10 and years Of age
in te custody Of the father Mr. and Mrs live separate
and she has brought action fer divorce. The present
proceeding 10 The custody OF the children The judge
said the law gives the custody Of the children to
equity branch Of the Supreme Court as Court In suit
for divorce the proper mode in relation 10 the custody 81
the children apply to The Court in which the action
Is brought affidavit. The Uabess Corpus was dis
Before Judge cANrHgLL.
Mary Cleveland tssiIst Abraham Basori.
To damages for alleged respsss in entering up
plaintiffs premises snd making alterations thereby
exposing and ajgrng her goods 10 already referred to-
Verdict for plaintiff sl75 with liberty 10 defendant within
10 days, to make case proceedrgs in the meantime, TO
be staye1.
James Eivood srsint merritt AID Langley.
Defendants are proprieors Of Dey 81 House gentle
man named FoOe put up there. 1t 3 alleged that while
he was in hs chamber asleep some person entered aud
took from lis pocket slg7 II Il alleged the landlords
liable for he l0ss, end action brough, the claim having
BEEN assigned TO plaintiff ia consideration Of $50 IL
testified by Fooe that be had the money early in the even
ing before and looked at his pocket book next morning
and asceTisned that the money was gone lie had been
Castle Garden in the evening" and had gone out before
be discovered his loss in the morning Ia defense, was
said that there bolt the inside OF the door wh,h
Foote should have fastened % well as turned the key
also notice that there safe IN which money or valns
bes would be deposited for safe keepng-and further that
he could Lot say he actually had the money before retiring
for the night. Verdict for defendant
evsdor JoeTh Costa b. Italian Stellar keeper
bordnshou ast the CAPTAIN Of the seian barn
Tie vessel lay at the wharf and the plaintiff went on
board but accosted by the captain and ordered away
II alleged he was going when the mate caught hold Of
with billet Of wood Action is brought 70 recover Dana
ges for assault and battery Amount laid At $500.
In defense it - said defendant apprehensive tbas
plaintiff seduce away his crew and that he SAID IN
reply TO question, that he would take them away ne
could get them that the captain took him oy the et arm
10 put him Ashore when plaintiff put his hand in his pocket
"A n 10 take ont knife when defendant struck him with
rs st on the shoulder and compelled him to 20 on shore.
Iwss denied there any attempt 20 dra" KNIFE 'er'
John MSsh I'd Msy lis vii. sr Fsnes Beesyer and Margaret
Bis Wif-
To recover damages for aiexed SANDER; The parties
reside ia the same house in Mub alleged that
Mrs B. aid Mrs McH met the usbsHe q ne former on
M. nocke ard took his money The utterng Of the wof
was denied Verdict for plaintiff ak cents.
SUPREME couRr-spEeIAt TEss-Before Juags Rsoszv1Lr
THE IssUscrIoS As TO Russ PAVEMENT.
This matter came up yesterday lbeing tic injunction
which has been granted restraining the Corporation c
giving contract to Messrs Russ Reed for paving Chat
ham 81 Bowery, &c,) motion is pending 20 Ansna e
plant Mr. Noyes appeared IN behalf OF me , ~
and Nr Willard for X g. X. The latter sssea s -. -
case be regularly placed the Calendar ana ~
in It's regular course. lie was opposed 20 VIZ q , ~
| - t. Ii "A