New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-02-27

Court CALENDAR-Ihis Day. -SuPE-
RroR CouRr-Nos Sc, so, 426 49, ISL, 152, 80, 456,
457, 45s 46l 463, 465 467 46s 400 All 47s 473, 4,
476, All, AS $50 1896, an 3i 1914 o. 4os 40 4so,
4sl 1885, $685. 2ss 24 1856, 33 $685. 4so, 49, a5s, 439,
464 SIS
U. DISTRICT CoURr-Nos 30, 81, 80, 20, "a, s.,
SO, 81, 30, 3d.
SUPREME Court FEEL, Goodman and
Smth agt. Marshall o. Robsrts.-Three suits BY par
ties who engaged for passage With the Pacihc Mail
Steamship Company, OF which Mr. X. ~ Treasurer,
for passage TO California ~ recover damages Tor
alleged breach OF contract, in not afording proper
accommodations, &C., in the passage To ChAgres-
also Cefestion az Panama, III consequence oil which
plaintiffs had to return, &C., already referred TO.
The damages were laid In each case " -. go. The
case tined before referees, who have given Judg'
ment for plaintiff in each case for 1880
SUPERIOR CoURT-Before Judge Sand
foTd-RoJt f.. Latrnifz ast. Hamilton j. combes.-
Plaintiff executed some marble figures for the New
Hall of the Second Municipality OF New Orlesns-
an ilstallmeDt Of 81, l66 Go was about 10 become
DUE and he obtained 5000 on transfer OF the claim,
fwi Draft to coect) from Mr.. G. He claims that
Mr. c. after COLLECTION h was to I em s ,as sss,
and pro rata sum If not paid MI alter that time:
The present action Is TO recover the difference aud
il Is commended Mr.. Is not entitled TO the extra
charge, as it was usuIiOus.
In defense il is said that the 5000 was paid in fall
for the claim that the first draftwss not paid, ana
"a
difference Of interest," which was PAID.
On the part OF plaintiff, an agreement on the paU
Of plaintiff, dated same day with transfers, sssnS
forth that he had received draft, &C., and woaid
paw difference, deductiDg $50 &C. as stated In COM
plsint-but il COMMENDED that there was no PROOF
TO show this to DO the same TRANSACTION.
The Court charged that where two insfumepw
are shown bearing similar dates and relating 70 sne
same affair the law presufnes that they rese o .ho
tame transaction, unless the contrary Is snorh III
for the Jury 70 say whether the iatef was 'he case
or got Verdict for plaintin, SZJc IL.
Nsuton Dsuel sst. Rot Spence. and othrs-Tore
cover the amount Of two notes, for 500 and SOD,
made by SWEET & Tibos, Of Marlborough, Ulster
Co PAYABLE to snc Endorsed by Mr.. Spence, OF same
place snd claimed 10 have been. passed 70 joan
huxley, IT., and Deuel. for value, and assisneo3oy
Mr.. 3 70 plaintiff: .
indorsed Nv him for Mr.. ssett for accommodation OF
the firm, and only ore to be used-one was payaole
at the Highland Bank, and the otner at the BANK OF
NewbuYsb. One was 70 be offered for cisconn' a.
former and If they refused the other was to be Of
fered at latter, but they both refuset-afer wnich
The notes we're passed 70 b. & D.. one Of them of
that MT. B. nsa kno Wedge OF she facts Also snss
there was usury, IN per cent. month nasing ~.
chasseo. The points are cesied seaiso '''''''
WIZ Before Judge Oakley
Ktmp sgt Thomas CarnLsy, Sh,rf-To tem ~
ON stock Of goods IN Broadway, areaoy re.s,i :,
to Verdict for plaintiff, sa ~ sns c cSs
<o,yeD, Jr 49, an cAnykes Schsiz.-rla'n'n
I,iras .c,ion for sanoer He says ne " - cic N
he .tore OF M LsDkephas, Bowsry ~iss os,shs-
VIC the store ana 10 the presence OF MI ~:
ahL ehtI.s Cd id rec haired Dutcb tnief, "
eaneo pnusnce Of which, be saws, Mr.. L. discharged
liz la, his damages at 81 o00. In defense
said the words we're spoken they we're so N ~
S.st NJ px,soL, pIoyOkes oy the remarks oil plah"h
b.m,sn yerdict FOR plaintiff, 800.
NatAanief =. willis ast Eden forrest -fn.s ea,o,
by cousea. OF counsel, was ptstpOned 10 soh'"'
! Lert
SupRyuE CouaT-G eneral rem
~ ss.,n,t uoark--Ths case was cohc'a'e''
S.p,Ss cour, sGjourpee 70 the ON o. ns,ch a. n
Aansson % tAs Bar M oa naeIs asa Attorney
oil ne Term will be held on Monday oy Judge
poassysIr TIE Circuit Court WIN ss" "9oh W
| mnnS., before Judge Ropstyei