New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-13
CANADA
The New Commercial Policy-Law ana Equity
Reform Telcgraphic Extension - "oi"
Wu-hipg-,

Corre,popdencc O! The y Y. 1uhrne.
ToRoxro Saturday, oct Q, 1882.
There is a rumor. 10 which but little clrcula-
lion seems vet to have been given that some eVen mas
occurred to postpone If not to cause the dehA'e aoah
donment Of the new commercial policy toward 'Ae
United states do no, voach for the enilre accuracy
Of the statement but | should not DC surirised Il
turned out true While the Government was sup
ported in iis policy by the Commercial Convention
lately held al Quohec. It encounters pArlla OPP sin,
from, the mercantile chs- IN Upper CauAdh Inc 4"
rorto BOARD of Trade although repr"-rnu NJ me cav"
Commercial Convention las I'd pea mem jrl 20 ~
G.yerutneui against tie uoW comm iclh pJ"'!. La.
argument 81 me memorial nsnn-t iht ihpo'N'o' "a
dlrcrcu,al duties '-'inf. me UlUeh SUI -
that tucL q JOh,y would o-c-E up nc cs'',1 =
relations of the Upper Cana,a merchants AMI MA
them dependent upon tire limited resources Ca MN
,r.i d ,bo. retaliation IN taqd bringing r" pr ny
would probably Lead - tie repeal Of ne Cl'e =
Bonding Act, winch cnah"- " To- H' %, Pl'S
through the United Sirtes g. tnsHni ~" g" ,"Y.
now Iolicy naturally more o5jc-tci - ~ l. puf -
i'm LIVER Cnradn. because an mcld'lt. cittt Ga u
would be to fsvor the trad" OF Qd"Dcc ana VI 'hie"
TIE press Of Upper Canada 4 diyidd on tle lu'Sl
but perhaps majority OF journals arc opp)sei 20 ul'-
entsl Guiie- or retaliation; "lli' s"'ns ''.'!
ucrr tic G. vcrrracrt policy mo- because l. s'o'"r a."
iiIabc in itscl. IN, because may result III me e'''
liehmeIt # a reciprocity OF trade
As eliminated some tim ago Ill4 ht be the case
the Government have come down w-h cjNpF'''h
,ye rnea,uIe o Law and Equity ,.J..L l. pioppc' -
abolish the Court az ChHntcy o. -epatHir touh'i
10 rr,fr,rn,ro me Courts of Qle"n- b'n'h' Appeals
and Equity ana confer On c-cn oi tlc JUG aii I'
powers thht now apicn o ,hc iAI,s Oh tA,'e "4it.-
am courts IL ahui.n". d. dt-uu u0n between 'nr
different forms OF cyil actions rn provide ih th''
,bal be- but one Kind OF action, which shall Dc cal'i
d" an action op the case TIE complainant u 70 aic
h. case a. best he MY. te impie-t rnsdHsr AMI
without unnecessary repetition. Iae drrnl-nt Is 10
answer ii Ice can. tie allegations o; me complain M
and all unanswered, ,tatemcnt- are to be tNnh - ifde
Il the an wcr contains new mattrr the conpinnin i
TO have twenty dave 70 prepare a reply hut a''-I
the time there be- reply to now matter c'h~lei III
the an. wrr and II .uch new matter commute
decne the defendant may sl-n nteriocutofy Judgment
and couiiuac ui damage may be Gsc Ell NJ the tsia d
the cnu,e io sIi,e the judgment OF the Cout o. ne
Judgment of the Count may b" hr-t obtenei amt hrn-
age. be subsequently .seod hy or'cr Of me Court
Uulcss Nv pcc pcrm ion a the Court there j. 20 of
no pleading but the complaint tne answer "ni t"'
reply" The pretsnt " TEN ci pleading l. ." "- en-
trcv Lhcl ted and entirely code % procc ,nre
e,tsblshed No -peciI pleading D. b. p'rinHt J. =
not intended a. pu-- the ih- -c-iOn but u "i-
low lime ,or the cxprc--ion of public opni"n upon H.
In connection with thu subject % Law Reform M ,lrr
iii ha- been introduced by the Attorney u 'Ach lor
conferring equity jurisdiction ON The County Court
The following telegraph lines are now IN
course Of con truction by Me.-rs. snow p"isrt