Semi-weekly North-Carolina standard. [volume] (Raleigh, N.C.) 1852-1853, 1852-08-04

son. Ahohas ], po,
Onslow-Edward w. Fonv;ue
G1ange-Cad. Jones, jr., D. A. Montoo,,.
Il. Durham, George Patterson gOmery, B
Pasquotank-George D. Pool
Perqnimons-Thomas Wilson
Person-C. S. Winstead
66NITaham J. BLOaO, M. Dickerson
RR:andoiPh-J: ThOrnburg, J. M 4. D,oL.
Rlchmond-Waher L. Steele, 'U"e'
Robeson-William McNeilI N NN,
Rockingham-Thos. Rufin, IT., Hor.,;e T..
nowan-H. II. CaL0oceH o. G. Foard -A0l'am.
Eutherford-J. B. Sloan, Cabin J, W:m
S eant" Herring, Jno. L. Boykin
Surry-James Sheek, Jos. Cocke,b.u
Lean. N0iHdln' J. R. Me-
Stokes-Allen Flynt, H. Marshall
Tyrrell-Joseph McCleese. - A. Waugh
ders, BurwelI Rollins R Ne"s0"' Romulus M. sauD
MaTen-Francis A. Thornton, VIM, E.,ou
Washington-Uriah w. Swanner. Ha'Oh' j.
Wilkes. B. Gordon, 4. M. Fost.r
Mayne-C. II. Brogden, John V. Sho,,,,
Yancey-Samuel Fleming. ''afu'
IS Democrats and So Wings. We b.r, ,
ed Mr. Erwin with the Wings, because bn wv ','s'
Southern Rights Wing but he is now fas ~ tuen
and King. By the way, we hope to ba, 'e,ee
high qualification of recording his election to th ns
Senate from the Buncombe District over tho S 'ue
Seward candidate, N. w. Woodfn. W. So
also placed Mr.. Brazier among the Who, k,. -1'e
he was elected as an independent Who tks1 N01e
he gave some good Democratic Votes dnrinn 3
last session. Messrs. Pope and Clanton we ba- o
also classed as Wings because they wera e,ao %s
as independent Wings, though they also pavs SOW,
good Democratic votes. They were and are both c.
Reid; and we think we are safe in SAVING thor ~
both for Pierce and King. Mr.. Ravner 10 w. NC
and is of course so classed, though we learn !, 5
not pleased with Mr.. Kerr's majority, Convenian
doctrines, and refuses to say whether he will Gym
port Scott.
We count, in this election, with absolute 70,
! tainty, on one Commoner from BIaden ono e..
Burke and Mcdowell, two from Caswell ono g."
Chatham, one from Cleaveland, one from CoIpm
bus, two from Cumberland one from CuritnoL
two from Duplin, two from Edgecombe, two fom
Franklin, two from Granville, one from HAYWOOD
two from Johnston, one from Lenoir, four horo
Lincoln, one from Martin, one from Moore tl,..
from Mecklenburg, one from Nash, two from New
Hanover, one from Onslow, three from Orapoe oro
from Person, two from Robson, two from Rock.
| ingham, two from Sampson, two from Surry. two
from Stokes, three from Wake, two from Warren
two from Wayne, making in all Sc we count with
nearly absolute certainty, one from Craven, one
from Greene, one more from Granville, one from
Jones, one from Northampton, one more from Orange
one from Perquimons, one more from Surrv one more
from Stokes and one from Yancey and We have GOOD
grounds for hoping for one more from Chatham,
one from Chowan, one from Halifax, one from Pitt.
one from Rowan, one from Rutherford, one from
Caldwell, one from Washington and one from
withdrawing Sc absolutely certain, 10 near
ly absolutely certain, and whose prospects are
good. In addition to this, the Democrats have
candidates in BERTHE, Carteret, Gates HEREFORD Ma
con, Pasquotank and Randolph with some hopes
of success; and the Southern Rights men, Demo
Gratis and Wings combined, have candidates in the
field in three or four other Counties
| The Senate consists of so members, and the
Commons of 12O. The last Senate stood 81 De-
mocrats to % Wings, and the House IS Demo
Gratis to SIS Whigs-making Democratic majority
of in the Senate, 10 in the House, and conse-
quently majority on joint ballot of IA. We may
concede a clear gain of to the Wings, and still
have majority of 2 on joint ballot; but we con-
cede nothing-if we lose at one point we shall gain
at another. Who supposes that the Wings can
make clear gain of in both Houses? And even
that gain would only make tie. Upon the whole,
we think it quite certain that the Democrats viii
have, in the next Assembly, majority on JOINT
ballot of not less than ten-an excellent aD2r67W
majority. 1t may be more, but we do not see how
! it can be less.