New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-01-02

lot tbxt Mr.. =. was 1uily peisuaoo1 "a ..,s nop
f. charge at Philadelphia thai Dis Charge VOC NV
I'll founced.
NJ. Cn,s conndered tina. it was against toe ss-
.h,;sssd nract,ce for party TO rea1 MS oM Tsa
Vt preparatory toreadDg ,nas % n,o5ucsd 10 his ewn
a~ n Mrs rs affidavit is read, anl any ,nnf =,
iaso., xhich will require explanation from A,. -
sMSayit, it may perhaps be gwen; ou, '"e
ein hceiu by reading Mrs rs aln1d'it: LII
mvss Vsn n eYcepted. Mr. Van b. salo ne "ouiu
EIxom The afidavi, Of Mrs +. (of 2Oin DEE, iooy'
81 nrblssed at the time in the report OF the p'o
ceediprs inTe alton 70 inJuncloh, ,ss whole az.
M OC. claimed that he must READ the "H'''' w
..ra q slight irrelevant reservation
Xr Van 3. did not propose 10 re@' Oh, at "a, read
re- Cow aid the rule is, that parry can ,oao
.,ch mart OF the affidavit as ne pteases t 81 esees
nte side can asrwa fesa a., ,hs noIe exccp. what
has been stated.
Mr.. Van u. replled' -. -. .o,.;5.ved after-
Ths Count sait the effect IS 10 De consioeieo a''''
-.,d n does not matter VINO reaas II. ~ ia :,
W ysn d. read part, in which MIS-. +; sat IA AZ
1850 IN what happened, he said saio ne n&o
Swavs been affeciionate. attentive ano
he has been 50 to within TWO years VI 'a' 0'"'N
as,,f. Mr. F. never found me standing pe
..ew The knses OF Mr.. JAMESON nor Win ms ndnuo
~ me neyson, nor In any indehcaie posEoh AesI
on N Jameson after Mr. F. found the Consueo
49, he never spoke 10 me about j. VIVA, MI :
ssSs as to M. j. and myself at Cincinnati OF eise
where, II untrue. ,,.. Az, 7 race;ved visits
Dom afer the Consueo letter there is TINS truth
hn, !, ,se saw J. at Cincinnati. and he promised,
in MI = "A presence, to bring me some music, "nen
he came 20 NewYOrk and ne callso on me IN 80
Il and treated him what ne consideIeo coo,y nc
,eyer called on me but once the hTst conversation
between Mr. H. and myself as TO the C0nsuelo lever
was later than January 10, lo49' 49,. 49,
xnarh,r never concealed the Consuelo letter, nor
aid Mr. +. find anything IN u TO snow conduc'-oe-
Com na4lN fefg~
Mr. Van b. proposed to Rad the statement as 70
the Corr ueo letter In Mr.. Forests affidavit as 10
the contents of the letter, aud the manner ana cir
cumstances under which Is was oiscoveI:o
Mr. orc contended that Mrs. FORESTS anoSvH
must first be disposed OF he parts Calculated
70 do Injustice and has not read yet 70 sho"
the necessity OF a reference TO Mr.; rs ain1ayH.
Mr.. Van b. said II was TO DC explanatory nc '''0u
eases to show ne was at liberty TO co SO; ,
The Court though. the affidavit oil Mrs r: must
srs no disposed of and that before any part is pro-
perry IN testimony. o..
whole Of 1t, although ne ueiieu the fieh' OF 'no 0
slde 10 require IT l.
Of 10 be excluded, and perhaps some other partS-he
~1 MI Vsn H. read Have not charged Mr.. F,
with in6dety that in another action, and he denied
particular dates, &C, but no. the iact
fave Mr. f. an opportunity to Tecede MS charges
AGAINST me have sand nothing against MI r OUT
xbat was necessary to the complaint ard 10 snow
INV own innocence; when prused Mr. F's anna
vii impugnng rue and my family 1t was necessary
fsr me to act he took me from my fathers hearth
and now seeks to cast me of the exravagaat
charges of Mr.. r. against me lead many to suppose
ne IS insane or mised, but is neither regretted
that the rules Of the Court would permit mr., +. 70
introduce in his affidavit about our controversy as 10
Mr. Macready, or to introduce matters about my
sister, who has stood by me during my uiai never
heard nything before against Mr.. Jameson, nor OF
ANYTHING IA regard to hlm and Mrs. Hunt Mr.. +.
10 IN as IN j.
did not cay finding the Consuelo letter, tnat any
vutuous woman would have spurned 1t. nor dld Mr..
T. say II was reserved by Heaven as an instrument
OF nay exposure Isaid, on separation being spoken
Of that the public would suppose improperly and
he thought Otherwise; he said he had no suspicion
OF my purity; signed paper, IN which believe 1t
was not alleged that was innocent OF improperly;
Mr. 7. never asked me TO take an oath, and re.
fused as to my purity think The paper was ante
dated by Mr.. Forrest the paper | signed was az
terward referred to in Mr.. F.'s affidavit never be-
fore actual separation DAD ask for an allowance
be said before that he would provide for me be-
heve when Mr.. L came into possession OF the Con-
meo letter he was seeking some ground to repudi-
ave me- although he had not thought as to lmpurlty
Consueio is French novel It's title signfylng CON
ISOLATION after Mr.. +. had been informed as 10 the
character of the book, he did not consider IT would
answer any purpose he has declared he had no
cause TO suspect my purify TIL the discovery OF the
Conseuio letter he sentenced me on the 18Th jan
uary to separation, without any cause, and after
ward said 1t at that time he discovered the Con-
seulo letter. but think latter was afterward; what
Mrs. Underwood sand IN her affidavit to be sent
BY Mr.. 4. 10 the Pennsylvania Legislature about
my going to the drawers and making eypla-
nation as to the letters being gone, is untrue
never asked Mr.. Z. to be silent as TO my conduct
no understanding was had between us that we
should occupy the same room to prevent remarks
was spoke~ OF as tn separation before he found
Ne Consueo letter MIR. F. would not 60 out 10 par
ties bu, wished that should DO SO without him on
the separation asked Mr. r. to request Mr.. Lawson
l., .l,Is hat fnd <.l
him | said he had been friend OF my father. and
wished him = conduct me 10 Mr Godwln's ne
said he ~ y so himself when Mr.. F. spike of
getting II btion from the Legislature OF Penn
ylvanA Iii was Oh account oil lncOmpatibili-
y OF ,eniy11Sfhe charge IS untrue as to my being
accustomed TO intoXlcatSon never was so IN my
HE IL is true Captain Caerat, an old friend
Of my faihcis, called al the house-Mr. Ray
mond once or twice, was up one night, all
night, with my sister, Mrs. Willis, and Richard
Willis, but under justifa0ie circumstances-a whole
night; what Mrs. Underwood aud Garvey stated In
their sidavs rs not true they never swore 10 In
away that could be taken notice oi--when they do
u can be fetuted II Is not true that the house was
closed at 10 O'Clock when Mr.. F. was home; we
had always been accustomed 20 very late hours
when went to 10th st 1t was no. finished Mr.. Ste
vens was the first who catered the hall he has act
Cd against ne and my sisters, and been Mr. FORESTS
instrument the course OF MIR. +. toward me was
hot that of an honorable man to ward guilty wife;
made me IN every way Suoservient 10 MS plea
seie anu CouNtultHCt az W MI udSoOH, NoHeiiSt
him pure minded Christian what he states as to
my saying Mr.. + and myself lived as brother aud
ssser was misunderstood; did not suppose he would
have believed me capable OF so immojest and unbe-
coming a communlcat alton which he has attributed TO
me said to Mr.. NJ that sometimes Mr.. +. was mo-
rose, sometimes afiecionate, and frequently treated
ne more like a sister than wife my present course
Of uie Is not prodga nor reckless, nor do give ex-
pensive entertainments 10 any persons or receive or
entertain any person persons OF loose or degraded
cnNacter, Ms Mr.. Forrest untruly alleges the
charges OF keeping unworthy company, and OF evil
haosis and chalac made against my sister Marga
Nt by Mi. Forrest, are wholly untrue sac has been
= ehonsier in one OF the Episcopal churches for
seven years past.
M. n, =. Willis was introduced TO my acquaint-
ance By Mr. Forrest, III 1888, and tue acQu iiaiance
cohtnaed thenceior~ard, the most friendly
relations appeared always TO suoslst between Mr..
foffest and MIR. Willis l never heard a murmur
against Mr.. W. from Mr. =. until the summer of
isis, after cur separation, when MIR Forrest ex-
pressed TO me his dissatisfaction with some article
published by Mr. w IN has paper about the Astor.
pace noss, and about Mr. FORESTS dispute with Mr..
hacrescy | never heard that Mr. +. sus-
P&cteI charged any lmnrODretv hetween Mr.