New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-02-24
EUROPE.
r,,prHER NEWS BY THE CAMBRIA.

a.. morning We subjoin the interesting IN
.',r.,pee they contain
ENGLAND.
p.,l;ameat was opened on Tuesday, Feb
Lord Palmsrsion entered and took his seat un
,,,.d and was passed without recognition BY Lord
-, Rn,seIl and Sir Francis Barring After the a =
49,, had been moved by Sir WlLLrAm BULKELEY,
~. a.n;.mjn Hall said that he would not oppose
,oson. but az the hist ph 0ithe proposed
sSass referred 20 foreign affairs aud important
Ssss h.d taken place IN the mnis.ration OF our
torssr policy he took the eariiest opportunity of
asking Lord kusssI lOr an OF ,aese
ss ~ this course, quoted stfoug language used
Int stort time silce ~ Lord }. Russell III appro.
bst,on of Lord Pslmerstons policy and conduct,
md saving that ne would nOi refer 70 mere fumors,
800 horizon Of letter written at Vienna (under
che believed the direction OF the Austrian Govern
ment) announcing the res,.na'ion Of Lord Palmer
ston before the event took place.
foyd J. RUSSELL was TeaJy - answer the INQUIRY
Ne had ever shown, not IN words only, his sense Of
Lord PameIston's eminent abilities and services
and had in other days expressly recommended him
10 Lord Melbourne besides invariably including him
In any plan OF Coyenmelt formed by himself
But circumstances had occurTe- such as ia his mind,
had made ii impossible for him aay longer to con
tinus IN cooperation with Lord Palnerston. He
proceeded to make detailed statement OF the
which had led to Lord Palmerston's resignation.
Describing, frst what ne conceived to be the rela-
tive positions of Prime Minister and Foreign
Secretary, taking the definition Of the foVer from
the evidence OF Sir II. Peel before the Committee
on Salaries, he stated that ia August, 1880, letter
had been written to Lord PsImeIston. in which no
nected that the affairs of his department would be
carried Oh. o.
requires, FIRST that Lord Pe!merson will distinctly
state what he proposes IN given caee In order that
the Queen may know as distinctly to what shels
swing her royal sanction. Secondly, having once
siven her sanction to measure, that 1t be not arb
frsrily altered or modified by the Ministers Such
an act she must CONSIDER as falling In sincerity
toward the Crown, and justly TO be visited by the
exercise of her constitutional right OF dlsmissng
that Minister. She expects 70 DC Kept informed of
what passes between him and the Foreign Ministers
before important decisions are taken based upon
that Intercourse TO receive the foreign dispatches
10 good time and to have the drafts for her ap.
Drova sent to her in sufficient time 70 make herself
acquainted with their contents before they must be
sent off, The Queen thinks II best that Lord j. Rus
sell should show this letter to Lord Palmers:on"
Lord J. Russell did accordingly, and received
reply in which the noble lord SAID ~ have taken
a COPY of this memorandum Of the Queen, and will
not fail to attend to the directions which IL contains
Incidentally, the speaker also mentioned that Sir X
Peel, on leaving Office, had advised the Queen al
ways to consult him. Lerd John, on all foreign
questions lie then proceeded TO state certain events
OF last autumn, and said that there had been Caoi-
net meeting on the the Sd November, at which II was
agreed that the state of Europe was very critical,
and that behooved England to preserve the strctest
neutrality. Yet a shoit time aterward, Lord Pal.
menton received Populations with addresses, In
which the most dsrespectf1l language was applied
to the sOvereigns OF foreign nations. But though in
this matter LOTd Palmerston had not exercised
due caution he lord J. Russel) had been willing
consider 1t an nadvetence, and to take his share
Of the responsibility But after that occurrence he had
expected even increased faBkness from Lord Pal
merst0n, and that he would certainly not make any
to foreign Governments without
giving him (Lord j. Russell) the opportunity Of ex-
Another case, however, soon arose, which this
noble lord thus described He said, the next trans
action to which shall refer-snd 1t is that by which
The whole OF this unfortunate result was produced
related to the events which occurred in Paris the
ID of December. There was meeting of the Cab
met on the Sd, and question was considered with
regard to request OF the Marquis OF Normandy ask
ing TO be furnished with Instructions with respect to
The continuance OF diplomatic relations with Paris
and the Government OF the President OF the French
Republic, and 1t was the general opinion that those
Citations should continue, but with respect to any
hing further, that We had nothing to do but to aD
stain from any interference In the internal affairs of
that county. Hear, hear My noble friend cor
rectly reported TO Lord Normandy the views we en-
lertaned, and which received the sanction Oh her
Majesty in the following dispatch:
FOREIGN OFFICE. Dec G. 1851
Ny LoRD-I have received and LAID before the Queen
susstns furnished for guidance
~ her Majesty TO instruct your Ex,elency to make
change your Telatisrs with the French Government
4 her
al Pans which would wear the appearance Of
N Interference OF any kns In 'hs in' pMrssTos
france. i am. nc rAb"1"'''''
This was the solemn decision OF the Government,
owed by her Majesty, conveyed TO our Amoassa.
ior ut Paris, and poiRiing out the line OF conduct
which would be pursued oy the Government mere
md by its representative In Paris-a dIait OF TINS
lispatch was sent 70 the Queen on the 4th, II came
back on the 5ih, and was sent to Paris. rev days
after among the Foreign Office dispatches which
came to my hands was one dated In Pafs on inc oth
and which was received ON tue SIN, anu WHICH was
as follows NJ. ,,s
nv LORD this morning received your Lordsnips aus
patch No 6O0 Of YESTERDAY date, and aferward caeu
on Tueot aud informed him that had received her
Majesty commands TO say ina, need make no change IN
Of what had passed added that there had bean some
Little delay in making tins communcsto - arose ron h
with doubt on the
subject M Turgot said that delay had been OF less nm
portsDce as he had two days since heard from m wal
entire appreciation OF the act Of the President, aud
your conviction that he could not have acted Otherwise
such communication and no Instructions osyotd our nva-
rsble rule TO do nothing which shou have the sppe
France but that had often had an opportunity OIL snow
Ing under varied ances that whatever misns
be tie attached the utmost Importance
anicable relaoDs between the 1--WE couh
tres added. that was sure hadthe Government knoSn
OF the the OF the rosues at tue
time had heard from them should have been commls-
sonsd to add then 10 mine have thouss'
II necessary to mention what was stated ABOUT nt
waewsks dispatch because two OF my colleagues mere
mentioned TO II the dspsich containing expressions
precisely TO that effect had been read to them 10 10
show the decided opinion which EE gland had pronounced
ihaye &c NORMANDY
On receiving this dispatch, Lord John Russen
wrote to Lord Palmeston To ask for an explanation
Of this inconsistency On the 18Th Lord John (beins
then At WObuIn Abbey received communication
from Her Majesty, making inquiries respecting the
dispatch OF December o, and asking TOT an expiaha
ton On this Lord John wrote 10 Lord Pamerston,
on the l4th December informing him that the queen
had asksd him for an explanation, but received
no answer, either that day or on the 18th. On the
10th he wrote again, stating that silence was not
respectful to Her Majesty, and asking for re-
ply. Still "ths same oiscainiul silence" was oo,
the two following dispatches, the first addressed
BY Lord Normandy to Lord Palmerston, the second
BY Lord Palmerston to Lord Normandy Lord John
Russell said The inquiry OF the Queen, as 20 wnai
was the meaning OF the alleged conversation between
her Foreign Secretary and The Ambassador OF ior-
eisn country, was LETT entirely unnotlced But on
the morning of the 18th received copies OF TWO ols
M S~<.. -. ~ Nar t.0T