The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-05-25
Superior Court.

plv'v 90, WINCH 'no u. . 1 'ss.S va" a., ;
me iaw anu ae ac. anu cone.ea , ny nr
s uy ~ 49, ~ Ita WJ,nsh Ne r. tIax var. mo-
was wii,ten by John mcIntosh nm .hoy wsre ny
, 1t 49, ~. !, IN, 81 ~; @ IRENE. Nv ths
I i,;% m,hoi, 70 In MIn,nh, Is a. tho vsr,ot
hp,d Nv ~ r. ni.;.;a. If - was no wr;ttsn ~,
49, a, Tio.h =. y. M az, Tion.s In h;s smthnrty
.uun ny @ " y ne 81 ~ ~ ~ tsSst vcr
a;t c i;y,T cr ,h f,, an,annt NJ note With in
t u..s :" a, I loo nm ga . " " ' ~
''i'''' e~i'' W. ""N 0V D.or,
p...u c,; az ,.;. o.L,ox
,1 ne g,,,, o ~ ,.,, E!""ch " cl,,k snS
MAY "'IIM .aW " M; ~ ~ Ill.,, - 49, .n" ~. ~. -
omns vs. ,saae ~ss "n "o'i'" y" n0so ~
nv" ao u i NJ ~ Tho. ..o rd.
A. nv .uuso, III nis I'M -, Nu ..". $3.50 ~ .
o usuiy -" ny uoiis.any 1ons " uo my ; "s
~. ~, au "u'oss, ."y ~ W. .p ~ =: H. ~ -
s,o's re ~ - iors 20 no u'y INV ~ go.
no ~nu ~ 70 .nv ou'y =. 'no oo,s Gnu Juiy W v
nv sSuIy aws 10 " ~ eAis.u III sSJ yva.e - IN
.n a s.au d a .as 60 a J $1,000 ~.
10y ~; -, L. ~. I,JI .ha,,.ht a. -. 80
s us p.p': 7. ~ ~. 'uIS1 ss.Os !. .t a.
d , .h ~ p,vs "G =, \; nv Spmh.. - ~
.,eeIy i,V. .AU Aioueyol ull. ~ 40 sAo 70 :,
tns ianu tnat note Ina1o IH .he purposI y. sS
money ~ useiess pieco VI p.Pe. 1nu wv a. y, UIu
~a t%s nav hn holds unIss. mnoasd mon nv mis-
anu .ne man VINO nolos ~ un,sss mpeu upon " Iii
P,, -: 800 ~. nvney. .o ~ ~
S NJ, ny - ~ ay . I'll 49,; @ -
~ ~ 'nI 90 ~ ayi AZ oIi "u ~. H. s -
-. - .n ~ ."oo -. .'Is ~ h,S - n
o ~ onren " NJ Ioom,s n% NO. M s y" NJ
was o no cohscquence Mr. LOOMS couo NOV cat On Mr-
Sisson or payment mr. LOOMS take, the bill OF &
T IA 80 di; ~ M !. N0 no"a ; - h -. :,
u ~ LII IN hin; .ma csnT.ya ~ ,hn So,n I Id n
to this COMPANY the DlnntT, they ded acting $50 for
the discount. There was no question hut there was
money enough taken constitute usury the
ton and il il Of Importance whether the plaintiffs
knew il an accommodation bill or not. The counsel
had pr perry said that il Mr. Garfield misreprescntod tho
circumstances to tho plaintiffs they would have right
to recover but that does not affect Ssson II the plain
ts lose their money they do because they did not
make proper enquiry The Court had no sympathy for
man who charges usury-it is immoral act-it Ii .
breach of the laws and holds oat bad example Such
man has no right to sympathy. II "A gets from "B'
valid note for 800 he may into the market and sell It
for 500 the law allows him to sell valid note for what
sum he likes. After further remarks his
Honor said that II the jury satisfied with the proof
In this case their verdict should be for tho defendant
not. they should find for the plaintiffs.
MAY 21-The jury, being unable to agree, dis
charged ut late hour last night
MAY 4-WUiam Wallace Stephen Chitendcn.--
Ihls Is an action Tor SANDER and libel II appears that
In September 1850 suit was brought in the Supreme
Court by Wallace against Chttenden, for erecting
steam engine in the basement and the smoke gas and
steam passed through into the store of the plaintiff and
injured his goods consisting OF cutlery &c. that after
the O. announcement Of that suit the defendant charged
he PlIutin with having sworn TO damned pack OF cs
IN I'iatloh 10 tnt SUM ana also IL appears that
ropDe,y was committed on the premises NO $50 Bowerys
ana mat properly was stolen from the plaintiff TO the