The daily union., 1852-09-15
Another Misrepresentation Exposed.


The whg press is deter mined 10 carry out its game Of
duplcity The whg organization. j, now exists. is a
fraud 10 accomplish bad objects by unscupuous
The Republic the special Scott organ in This city. if
demorazed BY It's position repudiate the obli
cations vhich rest upon the organ OF party aspiring TO
control the government II plays its part with an APP
pearance OF willingness. in game having for It's ultimate
object the design to cheat portion of the Union OF its
franchise and in the performance OF the part assigned 10
IT, the Scott organ has attempted fasten on the demo
cratic candidate for the presidency an infamous libel
which conrovered by the whole history OF General
Perce's life. The great leading attempt to defraud one
entire section OF the Union OF its franchise does not stand
alone for it has its likeness in all the minute features Of
the whg tactics. Only few days ago we exposed the
Republic in an attempt TO palm of the notorious Amos
Tuck as democrat when il wished to use him a
witness to sustain the authors OF the New Boston libel
an attempt which followed some days after by the
admission that Mr. Tuck out warmly for Scott.
when the Scott organ wished TO diminish the number OF
those members OF Congress who had repudiaed the whg
nomination. The last instance in which the Republic
misrepesened the position of individual in the course
of it's party service. was when it stated few days
since that c. G. Greene, esq, editor OF the Boston
Post and democratic elector sustained the Massachu
setts coalition and its candidates for the Senate
Messrs Rantoul and Sumner--and claimed the triumph
n tho coalition triumph of the democratic party.
This affirmation is put forth in order to weaken the hold
which the democratic party of the North has upon the
southern people, and thus to prevent if possible the terri
BILE overthrow which threatens General Scott in the South
growing out of the intimate connexon which exists be-
tween him and the abolition element Of the whig party
under the lead OF Mr.. Seward The Republic, having
been founded the organ OF southern President would
naturally have larger southern than northern circula
tion and the war which Mr. Stewards followers waged
on Mr.. Fillmoe's administration had also tendency to
cripple its circulation in the North Hence its columns
have been selected as the medium through which the
southern people may be misled by New Boston bes
and misrepresentation OF northern democrats; while the
Scott committee in this city, acting in concert with it,
adopts the attack prepared by the National Era and
ters in pamphlet form throughout The North and North
to arouse the abolitoniss and array them against
Gen Pierce The following extract from the Boston Post
nails the Republics last counterfeit to the counter.
Since the Republic has commenced its recent effort to i'm.
pose southern creduty would ask it state its
southern readers the OF those northern whg presses
and politicians that have refused TO coalesce with abo
toniss or have advocated intervention or sustain.
ed Scott and the Compromise while the Compromise in
danger When that task has been accomplished would
invite the Republic to define its position the Will
mot provso; for unless memory is at fault il never
did while that question before the country, but
evaded it by every cunning conrvance il could resort
to:
"The Atlas contends at time that old
hunke and, in consequence, have lost all influence and
power with the coalition element Of the democratic party
In Massachusetts Again, says coalition, because
merely published the of the coalition
for in 1860 and 1851, while the coalition ora
tors and presses denounce a the enemy the
coalition has, and accuse Of design TO throw
the state government back into the hands the wings
by opposition to the coalition We opposed the
coalition In the first instance We labored with our
strength defeat the election of Charles Sumner We did
recommend the support OF coalition by sim ply
publishing their nominations for the publishing nomna
ton is its recommendation, its advocacy, in the
the Atlas implies. In 1851 refused publish
lon nominations regular nominations. We have never
hestated declare ourselves opposed the coalition and
individual in Massachusetts has more bitterly de-
Post and in Massachusetts is willing to re-
ceve their denunca alton. The assertion that the Post
claimed the triumph Of the coalition triumph of the
democratic party is also false We but lite, how
ever the OF the Atlas It's cause
desperate its game desperate It's is reckless
hence shall give ourselves great trouble about Its
serons."