New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-12-22
DECISION.
T-hor,ss Mnihevil ast lanes MillwArd.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs-Beiore Judge DAILY
ACTION Dor DIVORCE.
Jnmes Pngh agt Ann Pugh.

Mr.. Cook opened yesterday for the defense.
He sad that Ms Push was formerly MIS- Leslie s sGe
1856 They were poor. Leslie vas in the habit OF nlem,
peranee His wife procured house IN GhsTty,s', ana
Al in the habit OF following the for hving came IN
1874 with his brother TO board with her Lsshe con
nued hig incorporate habits and enlisted III the Navy
Mr. Pub told Ter he knew circumstances IN regard TO
Ieshe bv which she could obtaIna divorce from MIN on
.he iob,ained a divorce from Leslie DIR. Push Dor
rCwed $50 500 and bought out the Daroon ana v'S
OF Mr. Rallcsn who has been mentioned IL tlis ase 40
who has coIil nally been an acqsIht1ncc " Us W..
Push tnd defendant, after the divorce rom Le.e VIZ
married They continued after her m s ~ basrJr
and she doing all the work with two gTs by me toh maui
~ of MrsP the business Of sailors ana yt
room being very profitable they eccuhnAt iD1
money boz ght the house IN which they iyed az mrs, shs
nlroftgase and paying Of sd extending aad imPrOVhs
n hotse "a a. 10 h. worth $500, and would ready le
f ccoayesr lie also purchased property at Fort Lee,
ard e worth some COO Soon atter their miFn'se ne
Ts;r rsiivs OF Wales aud she of Ireland he proposed
they should take trip TO Europe aud VISIT ,hei nien
which they did ringing with them her BROTHER wac
lad lost his wife and h' two ehildren one OF mem .nv
- e;J P's niece who has giyea ier testiuioty
Iere Fres-,tbius VEN on well between MI and MA
Push TIL his brother got morTee Jus WV Ne' r
b ia in her IDEAS, sud rather looked dowh gon ~ ~,
ENGAGED she always was IN the VEGA Oh hel hole -
While plaintiff asked his wife, the defendant NOT % come
to the table when the sister in law YVES there slbe
he cane 10 her with morgn-c on ttir reh ssAto oI h.I
10 en allsaiur as an excuse that u with view 70
borrow money loan his brother she would Ia sgulns M
sign her right OF DOVER she reinaeo say n3 YIN,
L lad already loaned money % his BROTHER and II mad Dse
lost He remarked, Oh, you woat he.-you ana win
be rwo7 lie had never found any tsat Wit e' 10,
her with mprOpuety 20 shy person NOT
lors after ths day Whale she and her sf we're prepar
Ing 70 up The dinner, SUMMONS v aS pIt "a nss als
for divorced and he told, subsequently, Dy
MIR p that sic must leave. On InqnnnG soe
was told By layer that sf n0S ., o1se her
which she told him, aud arrange iaent waS made
By which she 70 Tie house OF Af aud ls ralsr
hey boaIS Which wss ali that he allowed her The
mons aud sgreeably the rules in divorce re-
ouIed 10 be answered IN 20 days o. she "oui be coasd
tred having confessed 70 It's being tFue ohe We ol
swsre Of lie MODE Of proceeding aud no answer
was rat in on her behalf After dcfsnt Il was re-
s sps.,n 1 fr SesnSsnt Three witnesses two OF
them feipg the pertes whom Mn r. u s%s
testimony sor M Pugh and report was made SCANS
10 end Successful n setsns tne aeiaas ssi s -
and allowance % her Of Sso . bea out
In Igreedy ated Mr. &. commended that the testnhg1y
ytn Is improbable and way entitled % credit de
Barton Coates OF Mr. Rad can relative to whom me
have been made the stand lie sso 60 ma os
81 Inc witnessss tart0nl VINO testified asat As ruzh
r, Mr. Rucales Afterwards stated tina, the charges Is 70
hun were unfoun1ed and she is innocent woman
,rsnsstsd with Mr. and Mrs Pugh) called % me
sand behalf Of the eefense ne statte ,hh ~ ps
NJ an Mr. sweeny aequeintsnces at whose house they
were aid TO have met testified that they e'.I ~
,s "A sI lever knew anything improper in the conduct
OF Ms p Some other little testimony was ssen sa
closed both sides sefuirs a5tt.s- 80 - :
t Of divorce for indety dePriyes her o. any iDSs' VI
,isbt Of do,ysr d, her husbands real estate 49,.
TIL, case was given the jury. Sealed Verdie' 'ni'
forenoon.
corrRT OF GENERAL SEsSIoNs-Befsre the kE'
cczDxR and AID TWEED and Coas.LLin =,
Albert Lupert, indicted for grand larceny on
eor,nl.ipt OF Catherine Dowd. OF No. Il Anbesryst.
nerfrd guilty to Indictment aud was sentenced 70 inc
i,s. Wiisop indicted soT stealing gold coin jswerJ
I'D riofhine ftom Honora jenkins Of No 10 cherry 90
d. ieth OF October last tined and convicted Inc
Cont nced him the State PRISON tor Tour years and
VIM Megav.nsh indicted with Jas Mckinley for an 10
nil and robbery on the sht Of the 9Th OF Apn lat upon
h ner-ou OF Nathan Fsnders ct thar time reading No
"a xthav wa. tined and convicted Of ssszals and batte
onIy he was sentsrced 20 the Pcnteufiay for twelve
months -. ,,-. 4.
,auirr 800 rom Mrs. Kelly, vas tried but clearly
r-ovcd hi. inrocencc and acquitted aud discharged
The Court then sdjourned fsr the dsy.
1 COURT OF GENERAL sESSl0NS-Bsfore the Ne
ccrder and Aldermen TWEED and BARD
The case of VIM. M. Doty. indicted tor per
iury IN swearing fsley when sessfyns witness !.
Forrest Divorce Case ths mornIns called up tes ~
Counsei or the S.f-Ess, hox svsr. movsd 10