New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-09-10
SrprRIoR CorRr-Before Jude Camp.

Hone
fined await trs charge Of felony The prisoner was
committed preparatory to his being sent back for trial
SUPERIOR CoURT-Before judge Camp
bel-Dufeh Reformed Church in Forsyhs.-In the mat
ter Of the Elder, Descons and Trustees OF said Church.
against Rev. Frederick Busche.-A temporary INJUNCTION
granted few days since restraining defendant from
preaching officiating pastor said Church; snd an order
10 show why the Injunction should not be ade
msnent The parties appeared yesterday by their re'pec-
MI B. in his affidavit that he has been pastor said
Church Tor SIX years snd IS aceepsof 70 uEs uitvy
FIST 1916 reelected in 1919 BY unanimous voe OF those
PRESENT ard performed his duties without any ssatisac
ton being evinced until December last at which I'M prop
osiii1n made amend the by Laws ~ the Church. AID
hc (Alr unwilling 70 continue pastor unless such
revision " ere made and the bylaws Ia teo IooV we're
amended BY section 3 article % OF said bylaws the pas
to he elected three years as before or
particular time but continue to De the pastor t ne or
the congregation become desirous Of change wen SIX
months Iotiee was to be gyep hat tand"S aa
bylaw, meeting was called hy me 'onseSsto ana ths
BY laws re,ciDded, and the old ones adopted Oat the
proceeding not represnted by mot 81 the cnngre-
saou that tho 3Ist May meeting of the congregation
called which ded "a election OF PASTOR and hr,
ceved the highest number Of votes bang 81 70 -
for Rev. Mr.. Wolfe, for Rev. Mr.; WaAer ana
for Mr.. Heine when he declared duly elected and
meeting He claims therefore, that he duly elected
This is seni,d on behalf OF the spPlcati9n.-Dec'on
Before Jud.e Paine
William Remoney agt. Rebe-eo RewoHey.--Dvorcs
granted
fore Judge EdwaIds-Richayd J'ykqG Receigsy Of D.
Boknap agt John {. Hayo.On clsim in which defend
spt there had been conspiracy bet Seen parties
named ard he arrested for false petenees and his business
broken up Green Bay DemuHs Overrdled with Ists,
with Liberty to plaintiff to move to stnke 1ui answer or re-
I'm H. B1,,cfs st Haymoa MrpelerMoaon 20 open de-
fault granted payment Of costs Of entering up Judgment
B-f1fe judge Mitchell
.rgcob Te Rop ast MT ~ IOc5a.-P Plaintiff in 1915,
placed his Thos Ots lie Roy in partnership vita de
ie1dsn who was manufacturer aod had pa'eL OF timed
lead o q
Especial partner putting e1Oo his share OF the capt
tai snd Mr LaNber la msch cry, debts due, NC including
81 81 in money! 50 GO Pantn bought lots Nos 15 snd
23 Wsers erected the tive story building sad
esried on there. Plaintiff alleges that MI l. gave hin
understand mskiug the agreement that the ,us1esi f
defendant prosperous bit that In April 1872 he n) led
plaintiff that the firm srraed, and 1880
would be necessary cary through which plaintiff
fused to sdvsecs, aud demanded ois,olution OF the
fIm end accepted offer ron Mr. l. by which II
dissolved Subsequsn'ly Mr L. (detendant) OBJ
tanned Judgment sinst plaintiff ia the supreme Court
in satisfaction 70. c,ins ale ged have been against
the firm for $500 Pl.inh then obtained temporary H.
urc,.on restraining defendant fum proceeding und,r the
II ncttn permanent reopen t1s accounts THE firm
plaintiff ofthe nens maze TO him had
no teen conret-that The, Ots Ii Rog was yey S9uns
se ss gjyerled, q plaintiff wA' by the SAFE mems
Of MI Low her and that than the amount 81 the dg
in fact due plaintiffs, which ne seeks - Offset In1
Is denied BY Dir Lowber who ssy' that al h' staemsn's
bad been couect aud psiniif who is merchant and
Of business, bad constant s;;sss 20 the BOOKS and
were abied Judge for tlsmselses-thM plaintiffs had
originally asresd advance tbs $4,000 eNIa perma
meht ar to meet the extended business aud did 80 tenn
porsIy BY ncors ment but refused to rrnew-and urtner
that the whole matter underwent Investigation in the ta
/ IN Superior Court. The case Is on
Court OF COMMON PLEAs-BetOre
/ Judge Woodruff -Hchael MGrtiq agf Ptter MOTsOq-
For assault snd battery Pier No IL, Moth River,
already referred H. Verdict Tor plaintiff So, which
carries a like amount OF cost.
/ JGmts HG'rs sgt StpdsH B. Motrs, Carr & Brde",
Hi HgPpoek and Thos JACKSON Plaintiff claims % have
IUrch6ied Of Brooks & Hopkins toe public house
known the Excelsior In Nasssu-'t that SIR. Moers
and the other defendants sued separate sttachn 'ns
asslus, B. & II for DEBT aud levied upon halt pipe
Of brandy and five quarter casks Madeira wine Plain
III claims that be owned laid property, aud brings
separate ,u'ts against each for the value No defense
wks pnsTed. verdict BY direction 81 the Court was
rendered for plaintiff sgain.t The four defendants Tor
$500 e, CD
Po5ert Ts,lor sgt I'm Mrlst,der-Pisa Of U'Hry-
On rots inside BY plsintf In May 1850, at mo-, for
500 25 PAYABLE 20 his own order, aud indorsed oy
him TIE defer "a Is that the note was made for the
sccommo dslon Of John Jacobson, without consider
s,op who placed /. In the hands OF Mr. Beecher broker
for loan Of $40 for which 20 cents day Interest on
each 90 was charged-thst the transaction was, there
fore usurous and the note void. In reply was said
that defendant Informed Mr. Beecter, or authorized
him 10 be informed that It was valid business note
and that plaintiff in consequence, gave value Tor IL Inc
Ths Court charged that If M Beecher was employed
By Mr. Jackson as his agent and obtained me money 81
plaintiff without the latter being parry TO- OF
with the previous proceedings, and piaini1 charged ou
Der cent interest be plsnt end led to the amount
Of the note Verdict, for psinnf, ESQ. .,oo
Son,II G FY,ks sat Pster Ncou on note for slUV
made in ls45 90 days, to order OF VIM farley ana
II dorsed by latter The defense 10 tnat tne noso E
s,vep without value fer the accommodation OF Mr. r ar
ey and that latter Endorsed IL to Mr. sedgwcs 9rohs
Who became the owner Of 10 and brought sun 10 LSto
for the amount but judgment was rendered sg.lns.
him, that defendant had Previously paid me no'e i,s
plaintiff 10 not the owner, and iurtner tnA IIs -
barred by the statute Of Limitations The reply GENES
the allegations and says thai Il was DOT sccommodsuoa
BIZ, given for good and valuable eonsaersuon .Ia
action had been had that the statute does not Apply
To be continued this forenoon
CorRr OF GENERAL SESSIONS Wednes-
So,.-Before judge Beebe and Aid. Moore and Haley
Pisa Of GGy-Bush Gilmore nde.eos S 1 ss nao.r
In stealing watch Snd chain Easeo - $500 tr,is
n Mr. Rebt r James Of No. a shsriH pleased saiiJ
.rs v.s ,entenesd 10 the State Prison Tor two yea e.
Tri,I' for Gro11 Tayoenis -James enitn nsietes IH
,,eslipr So from John Torrepee, OF NO ls a T.
trsS and convicted The Court sentences mn % the
State Prison for two years . Ia .,d .,,vs..
sa i..1vi IN stealing 80 gold nngh valued at 100,
tcm he storc Of Mrs. d. A. wisksry, Ne I'D CsnaSs