The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-03-11

WTrHT55
was privileged from answering, the Court sust am
ed the objection, and refused to allow that cro-ex-
animation. Exception"
Court exclude that
Mr.. Evarts said he wished TO say that Tuesday
the 22d. was the earliest day he had any converse
ton with BURNETT.
o by MIR Cuitnc-How you able to TX that date
NOW? A-By the copy q a letter which wrote TO
Washington Q-Wil you produce that letter, A
No. o-nho was j ADDRESSED 10 Al decline to
% whom that letter was addressed [Book produced
nv the Dstric, Auorncyl-l have the memorandum be
fore me- C-Wil you show it9
The District Attorney objected unless counsel for IN,
cettndsnis would put Il in evidence
Mr. Cutting would not consent TO do until he saw il
snd he argued that the witness having refreshed hi
uomCry ~ memorandum they had right 10 see IL
The Court ruled that the defendant had right 4
see t.
The District Attorney waived his right. and nut the
beck into the hands u the counsel for the defendant
pcruse TINT particular communication Mr. Cutting
then 10y permission cf the District Attorney read the
letter -
SOUTHERN DrsrRIcr Nrw Yonx. !
u. S DlsTRicr ATroRNFY's OrfIcE April -. 1851
SIRJhe Marshal District has receiv inform
S Sf Of 5 % g s IN iSur
sS9 Of tgo sHs Fs 70 DEPART from , port in the
southern eosst TIE recise degree Of reliance which
mine ~ ,s notice e9nyeysd 70 the officers Of
e bearer wn ppc y ssnS par
@ Che sss a. aeSsa g sA. oPop an sfs s e. the
proceeding which can e taken arrest this expedition from
1e h 70 be dseTSed to ssm
here Il as gpga sch 1gthor conveyed to the District
was 20 Successfully ar-est.d in this port
trsasmd ~ telegraph message by that medium to the
% nn y setss So sutse
aicc r. may require to arrest the projected
eNpedu5n' have iEe honor % be
}. PRESCOTT HALL, U. :. Attorney.
Hon. DANIEL WErsrrR, Washington.
QWa4 the person referred TO in that letter BURNETT
iGhitcCd to nd rot admiited.l
AnnalC1 kal.0w rruGsian was SWORN and Ioui
Sonasschn w sworn interpreter in 2se he should
hould he required The witness spoke English little
aud only occasionally required the aid Of the interpreter
re deposcd- was acquainted with Louis Schlessnger
when he was in this country; have seen him write
he pspSr In ny hand i signed in the handwriting o
Louis Sclossinger, ! know Mr. 0'Suvan; | have re.
cetved letters from n the body Of this paper in MIR
Cross- xamncd--I am a prussian came TO this conn
Try IN May. 1871; then lodged at No Bayard street
when came 10 this country first was not acquainted
with schessinger, became acquainted with him in Feb
tuary, Jl don't remember receiving letters from him
lodged ia the same house with him 3sl Broadway
vas IN tbg export business down town. have seen Schlcs
singer wite IN the month of March in his room in some
books that were there paid attention 10 his writing
digers Employment believe introduced myself to Mr.
0suiliyan G-Nhcn was nc first time you saw Mr..
near tint could see it,
Q.-What do you by saying that the body of that
paper j. in hs handwriting, Al received letters from
o'Suliyan which OSu'au said We're his and have seen
letters in schlessngr possession which he (Schlessn
per) said were from ocuyan. and the handwriting is
Mr. Cuttng-And that's the only way YOU have Of
identifying IL submit TO the Court that this is not
proper identification.
Wine T. tie Court have received letters from Mr.
oSmh'ah don = Know now many, but three 1 have in
my pc.session
By Mr.. CUTTING don't know that showed O'SuIiyan
The letters received from him; I never saw him write
rxcep, 81 y,nh distance tbat co,ld ,ot 80 ,, ;,;
M ,,;,,,a.. =, -, ~" \ ..' =. ~ - "iitihs'
-. =, =, ~ t'" ii'E',h s,"teo. II answer 70
QUESTION ~ ar 'utung a. 70 now ne could prove those
letters came from Mr. oSuyan. when he him
write replied that OSuiyan told him the Letters would
be ADDRESSED TO Mr. Charles > nj The most oace 'N
Mir Cutting offered to prove hy witnesses that II was
NOT in tbc laY dvtiiiro ~ Mr. o.Suilivan ~ " ~
The Court-lou en- certainly have an onnort,p;ty nc
doing 20 rrd II win 80 IA thn inv =
Mr. Cutting offered now 10 produce the testimony in
this connection for lie ruruo.e If excudino the Manor
which i tempted 10 he sn,cqled in under the tast;
snony az man who never Jaw him write II was narov
a augsticr for tre Count a. IL ITO o,aar ~ MOOT
discussion IN which an the counsel toof nar ersrod
a. to Inc order in which the contradicorw tnstnnnv
should he admitted
The Court sad il would he purely question for the
iury Ia could no; undertake IA jacd ,ybetbar Il wso
or was ntf in tbe il, ,,l,,rifinr ~ ,ir o.s,;ynn 80
The pi.tfct Attorney road from s,a,kc on Ex;aonc.
u yoi uaqo 40 -
Nr CiffinS n ,rilnss l,.;,, vo, sy,or fiat 40 ,a
q. ira. rsrT * III tbc landvritng &c M o,Sn,I;San
-yas tbt+ II nv brIi,f a Is y9ur bacs az s,rona
/ % in1cc Won NJ wear thar ii i in his bandy,rtinr5