New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-04-14
XXXIId CONGRESS-. ..FIRsr SESSION.
SENATE. :. .WAsHrn0roN, April -, 1854
Mr.. HUNTER moved that the Senats


Mr.. HUNTER moved that the Senate
axe up the joint resolution making appropriation ibr
he extension of the Capitol and that the Senate receds
from the amendment making provision for cotnpenaa-
ion the aborers for the time they have been out Il
employment which had been disagreed u by the Houss
Mr.. MANGUM said there was no hope
hat the amendment would ever be adopted by do
House. and he hoped the Senate would recede from In
amendment and suffer the appropriation tor The pulls
works to pass.
Mr.. BORLAND repeated his opposition TO
the bill The Senate then rcceded from the amend.
ment Yeas 30 Nays, 10.
Mr.. HALE introduced Joint resolutions
for the relief OF the aborcrs the Capitol being copy
OF the amendment just rejected
The bill granting the right of way over
the public Iands, to the Missouri Plank Road Company
read third time, and passed
After one or two reports from various
Committees
MIR. CLARKE moved that all other or
ders be postponed and the Senate take up joint res
olutons reafirmng the policy of Nonintervcniion 10
allow Mr.. Bell to speak on them
MIR. CAss said that this motion would
place his colleague In awkard postoncut him off h
the middle Of the speech commenced yesterday by him
on French Spoiations
Mr.. BADGER said he had been In that
situation for more than two years
Mr.. CAST hope the honorable Sena-
tor does not intend tina position be precedent for
ELL that should be no long matching an egg.
Mr.. BRADBURY opposed the motion, and
insisted upon finishing the French Spolation bin and
alter some remarks by Messrs Cas-, Shields Bell and
Others Mr.. Fetch said he would yield the floor cheer
fully to Mr. Bell
Mr.. CLARKE's motion was then agreed
TO- and the Noninteennon resolutions were then taken
taken up
Mr.. BELL then addressed the Senate to
the effect that while he agreed the general tone snd
and effect OF Mr.. Carkes Non-ntervention resousions
he objection to those proposed by Messrs Cas-
end Seward and while he would vote perhaps under ~
the circumstances for either of them he saw no pccefy
for passing any OF them In the particular language IN
which they now were coucied. He thought il of b2
little consequence whether expressed our conssrn
at or protested against the violation of National law By
Russia be did not intend 10 discuss those subjects N
but TO call the attention Of the Senate and Country dc
great American question, which was, how b b
effected by the present state OF affairs in Europet
He gave the history Of the overthrow Of Louis Phil
ppe, and the succeeding events which have taken pIscc
III France down to the present seeming zcquiescenrs
by the French people, ia the strong and arbitrary ne~
cures OF Louis Napoleon He traced the events wh'ea
followed the French revolution throughout Europe AL
the unsuccessful efforts for liberty and pointed ts
present almost triumphant position Of absolute powefs
and the consequent destruction Of all hopes for freedom
He cited the facts that the commercial and M an id IN
eress and the stock board by their confidence gave
ssurnncc that those powers abolute in their nation,
were 70 be relied upon hrm and nmovabls and ps-
ing better security 70 those interests than the temporary
uprsngs and triuInphs OF free governmental Eng
land too, which had been considered as the Aamsx
sword, at the gate Of the Eastern Eden Of Liberty hal
gwen in adherence and submission TO t... new stse
things. He read from debate Ina Parliament speeea
OF Lord John Russell to the effect that he hoped hbeFq
may YET at some future period appear again in Eurc
Personal and national freedom was n principle wh'ch
bad ever been struggling against power.
why was that struggle now at end In Europss
Why was 1t that absolute power domiszss snA
supreme among the substantial people of Europe, tcoe
who In this country would be regarded tine bone a.
fiEewf The commercial and financial interests had -
come sstished shat popular forms OF government did sa
AFFORD that profession to life properly morals sad ns
obligations Of society which be found under nors
arbitrary and despotic powers. What 4 that ~
produced this change in the minds Of these the tk:s
ing and, not taking people Of Europei II was the n
PRODUCTION and adoption by all the European fsnss
popular government Of the ultra Wild fancl theozies
modern philosophy calculated, when carried into pes
teal operation, to disturb all the prcexisnng nodone
property In all that moral social, and religion
the adoption of these theories by the republicans
Europe, together with the o. their leatsrHs
when occasionally successful which has frightened ~
tirnd, alarued the ca,os. and driven on The thinking
| and substautia from the OF freedom
Philosophy governed the actions and policy and iteas
| Of thofc engaged in popular movements IN Euoss
There IhiIosopherx wrsSA up entirely In the hcosss
their cwp schoo rieessd the sxisting goyerpmsssa
III 7. L