New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-11
li-tpkc Corrected.

To the Editor Of The ~ Y. Tribune.
am informed by Mrs Stowe that mistake
exists in the last letter Of hers in the published cores
pondence between her and DR.. PARKER, in The Int
prudent Of Oct z and aso in The Neo York Observer
The whole passage following should be LETT out:
MY DEAR SIR: There are some few things in this
matter, that you know perfectly well Tor N@0n tha you
were satisfied u them az the time had our interview
IN the first place that the remark rs published was pun
shed in no pcrsonal unkindness whateyer-that u was
published ~ sentiment 10 be replied To In dramatic
argument tor Everybody knows that that Is the cnarac
ter of the article And your gwen, SIMPLY US
the name Of n leading who was knOwntO nave pun
cly advanced that sentiment had no possible means
of knowing that the sentiment was not yours, ana me
very strongest evidence tor believing That II was since
Won had allowed Il IN silence 70 become historical
document You know, and know, that You have used
Language which. when placed side by side with "nat
quoted Is such TINT not one man IN ten can De male 20
see any difference ! hmm this, because nave tlti
enrresfy and sincerely 10 explain 10 sensible men wnh
YOU did mean by the ldnguace which you admit tls you
usad and II hss ailed 70 produce any Impression on
them except his, thst It T. esulcal cOhstflcDh oI
language ~ which either Of two opposite cen
be- caimed the writer's scntIm ents according 70 eeI
geHCiez.
Il can stil publi.h the facts Of the case Just "a
wlote theu-srst what you did net cay second, "hat
YOU did ssy; Miyd t4s sddeuce that you knc" ne con
.fucfiOn which tn world putflug upon your
laurlsce and yet that you dd not contradict r. Buf
crr-sny think that the whole matter s IN more cred
liable fOrMtO YOU now tAaLN sLCuil 90 30
have done what / consiicr 70 be perfectly honors
be srd fair 70 iEputltiJn ior winch you nave
glven too much occasion
"Y0u know perfectly vel, Mr. Parker ic. toh you
.-gIkiv thar / did not consider ny>eI 70 nave setf"
wroLg il TIN matter but amply to have iale9 mo
ruissse which your silence rendered uha'o4"eDie' 'tu
consider my-ei 10 have said ell that you Gun p'seDS
,7pect from me under the CIRCUMSTANCE
Mrs. STOWE gives the following explanation Oh the
WV in which the mistake occurred, end, although the
Letter ia mean. fer me- ard = coloqu-al prefer giHns
the correction il Mrs STOVES language:
in vou, a1po-e nv Last letter 70 Dr.. PARxEs has
one mistake which ocSIred ~ ms way Nr- HOOKER
c.isd n for NE and NJ STOWE looked l. over in the
NV WHICH was cent to D. PAEKEA He desired me 10
S,ye the inclosed omitted, be feared L might only
,e,d 10 produce unpleasant, feeling and On g0Od
Is.BgILA omitted them IL the copy sent 70 am and
,upo.ed erased them from my copy. Never expecting
10 have them published did not notice It very partci
lsry When you relegrtphed for the paper, | was IN
Brunswick; started next morning for AndOver, where
the pspers were; got there abou: half9tst one had
only few moments 10 collect the papers and be oil IN
the Cor Boston, AZ two o'clock and put them into
the afternoon mail had no time 70 revive them this
accoun. for the mistake Perhaps you had better in this
way pubish this correction Immediately
This leter sppears in the published correspondence
in Tie Nsc York ObserrT just as it was in The In
de1sndent The reason is, that DR.. PAEEEz having
mislad bis copy Of the Letter. applied to me for H. and
was furnbhed with il JUS, as !; had been sent to me
BY publishing ihis yoU viii perhaps save some miss
preheusicu. HEssT WAsp BEE:IIEs.