The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-04-24

Superior Court-Part First.
Before Chief Justice Oakley,

ROMANCE OF REAL LIFE.
ArRu % and 23-Hugh Darids and judith his Wife, rs
judith BcgcT-This a suit marriage settlement
involving q considerable amount Of money. and some
peculiar circumstances, which are worthy of recital
From the opening statement Of Mr.. Henry A. Cram ON
te part Of the plaintiff II appeared that the defenda
and her brother both unmarried and passed the are of
eighty lived together IN Brooklyn in the receipt of an
enormous income some forty fifty thousand dollars
per snnum) of which they spent but few hundred dol
barr year that the plaintiff (Judth Dasiis) their
grand niece that her father (Mr Bradford) died in
1882 leaving widow and three children Mrs bradford
The female plaintiffs mother married a Mr. Bgelow in
scout year after the decease of her husband At the
dh OF Mr. Bradford the defendant adopted the plantG
Judith ~ her child supported her literally In
1907 Leon souberbeile. Frenchman who arrived in
TINS country with letters Of ndaton and repre-
senting himself as gentleman of good family and posi-
ton was married to the plaintiff Judith then only Is
years Of age and five months after the marriage Sorber
Dele committed some offence against the laws in conse-
Iuence of which he obliged to fly. aud did leave
e country and had been heard of since except
Wat he was reported 10 have died few months after the
ght of Soubcrbicllc. the plaintiff Judith gave birth
10 daughter living. In the winter of lS41i2 the
defendant and her brother James Bogcr DESTROYS
Of having divorce obtained for the plaintiff judith who
was still minor and was opposed to the project at the
urgent solicitation however of the defendant and her
brother the plaintiff consented. Eminent counsel wero
employed both in this city and in New Jersey where the
plaintiff Judith resided al the time: large sum of mo-
ney expended by James Bogcrt and an &C, Of the
Now Jersey Legislature passed at the solicitation CT
the defendant and her brother divorcing the plaintiff;
Judith from her FIRST husband Leon Soubarbiee From
that time the defendant continued 10 treat aud maintain
tie plaintiff her adopted child and James Dorcrt al
ap, NM; pun I'M, IN nn' aussf IN .hc YER 10 ~
- ~ i.;e- ~ nPtioo'ion - 'nc uoisHua,it
.'au .'e t'e'ii ouui.h' aue. On Wy iha.riare AIS
~ t " =, no ~, anu,'! - - wv anu pur-
~ Hos' "a co'iy s.'lr oh Tue QUA
49, 10" .at 10 "!loh ie s'S - .na ~ lac
,e I'M. ~ - :, sae 70 1ue li note iof
i p. III ~ = !. II, a'ii'ls ~ - asHeAts,
Lie plaintiff q similar note for the amount Tho
-, ,. '.e ~ -. ~. u'ae .iesc noIcs mere paa
~ apou' ~ i.oi ~ nail'se VI me Ta'hi
SN.n my u'iena's siu'u :. pay any more ana
~ - iee9Nei Sno =, NJ ins.anien's lant tnt
70 nov an tiia' previous 20
-, ~ -. -: seio~ va Tue cnih
80 iousn l-e oy =, Wy ,., anu icr
.,a -, ~, l :,, e ne. oaiui a,a' ne ues.
-, 49,: -, ,,;!, =; ~; - - lp, ati INV
~ ;. ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,a, iu =. y. sie' s innu
- - i;,;t, W. 80 ~ ~, .i i .i,i 'hs
M; - - Wy ~. NJ; ~ al ~ ., a :, anu
-; - ,h liza 49, ~ i;, " . .; p,sses
It'll, e,,a 10 ,i;n,ig ti,,p nr;, ~ an
; =, ~, Ia fa - !, - s. 80, =. 'i ~ tisas-