The daily dispatch. [volume] (Richmond [Va.]) 1850-1884, 1852-02-14
THE CARDoF THBTaPoGRARsACAL
SOCIETY.

fnkU6 INV
an argument to contend with, when We heasJ
| ihak The body whose RaWs stands q the heado
I this article, had mer IN Soirmn runcfuvei ind
desspnined to, ,demolish the DisRalcbs for al
though not garticularly fond Of cosiFeseEsy.
we ale SIN fess find of lighting ssainstt non u
entities.7t Merhave been sadlyIdissPpoint
A beautiful Shrinking of ItaIicsst the never
failingsskstaqte lor brains, WHERE ,5lsss latter
are entirely wanting, is all that's VIC have been
""o"eW s9.lt.L 0.egth 3tli ,
liz npossIbaesfhere IS any peJseni So aeRoid
of in,elFsshse ,as not to see ,he difference be-
tween theiriposiiion and ours Miih regard TO
what we hate yeiy justly designated 'tdicta-
tom" ..NaihaYe On office, and We faye, Ger
tain rt4es inthae office. Individuals. apply for
work, knowing the existence HID = Hhaaft'ffe Of
those rules. dEthey do not like them, Eve do
not asktsSH ID fome into our offi ss
not only ida come in, however, hut sgsppded
on by This Society, they afterwards seek
to force. ~ j9ptp an abandohnsnt f6f our
ruless Isqh 10 dictaton, or is it notl1 iOhr dic-
,aiion consists simply in adhering to our rules,
in refusing to allow body which has NO Fight
to exeffiSss any authority overns, 20 prescribe
a course Of CONDUCT for US. HAZE VIE not the
right, 1as freemeatand as citizens, te,do'sDl
But lppr et4iaaey, Our dffsrihasS fhere's
the rub FIheaneonceivable obs,inacyt Of Anne
rican citizens in Regulating their own coeduct
by their,own sense of justice to themsslyes!-
Truly this isq,ite an imperialme,hed eftreat.
| ing the subject! The obstnacy OF man, IN
saying TO persons who choose 10 iinteriere IN
his affairs, '"we' DO not want your adviee" No
doubt the high and mighty contracting parties
would have acquitted us Of sueh'an unseemly
vice. rhad ,weaela them to walk into our office,
and freghiate matters according tedhein own
pleasure, Goea ;. .t o. sgr,e1
Could any thing more effectually prove the
tyranny exsisissd over rl,s minds Of ifs mem
bers, by this saciety, than fhe 'effset Mhch it
produest iqPoRT the mind Of the gentleman,
whose card we published two daysssi5ef? He
tells the public that he was opposed, "upon
principle u sf Coercion; .bat y He be-
lieved eeer6ienlnorally wrongs Yessattle bid
ding. Of HE, sYtiety, he perpetrates the very
thing whehsba7 believes to be, wong, Can
there bs "a more thorough tyranny .haa that
which maa attempts to exercise, h6Loger the
body, but over the mind, the conscience, the
soul Of bis felAaaw mani kft, ssk, is not the
Society cvusti,uted with the exaress view to
rendeI Il ahsi9sgument Of tyranhy! H.it.is not,
whysdees tas constitution PrgEide 10 method Of,
resignation? r. not this omission made solely
with lbeyisw AZ having the iniembef always in
itsSp8wefq cDf having, at hs1nd always, the
means TO- erash him. wheneser, ile may dare to
recollecta that he was born a8freemapI Can
therebe mpfsI effectual instrument OF tyrauny
than Socieiythus constituted tnos-t
Phey shave taken no action on thciqaestion
OF expeiliug OF employing negro ptsssmen."
We kn6w; thatipery well, and we. are just as
well convinced that after tie 'expusufeiw hich
we have madp, mo action will he taken, at least
for SOME Gnie55to come. Intefmeddiing between
the slave. md his employer is,ratber q delicate
business inttiis ave-holdingcommuaity even
for the + yaogTa phical Janto. But It j. not de;
MED that the thing has been, as we stated, in
cofftefnrlalion! s'"ss.s. GA IN
On tRes spIlsct of apprentices, The, Society,
uCCUiUtttt5 tO~tHo CCI-
tain regulations which they deem wise, and in
which ,tlrey: hope 10 have the cereperstion of
ffie aEdtofs:. Srhis places them'iii fae superior
position Of authors of rules for lie on ners of
Offices 10 t6a6perate in eassrcing. ,,tTAis still
maintains the high prerogative Of fife Sovereign
whoissses lasprocamatio andicalls upon all
his subjsGistq give their co;sopefadon in its en-
| forcesneBt. 1911 y7nes, f,osers
The WORTHY foreman of THIS effies was dis
charged heeapse we were iptormfd.By, hand
reluctantt6fe ave our empfeymeat Ishai he had
endessypred 70 induce him to leave, and offered
to oentribaIe tow ard his support, No96pe could
expects kis Tetention after that. We regarded
him sifssaaa the office-ethifss' Il showed him to
| beam euemysc 1st.,...A ar -. =
.The!cafl 4 the printers says: aEa1s'
"Thef Baltimore papers ceptaipiipg The tele-
graphic newsLof Saturday and Sunday do not
reach here until Monday evening about six
o'cibck; While the same news is1inonr papers
/ Of Monday morning" . -, "'o 80 '+.:
This is not the truth. The RichptoSn3d papers
of Monday morning, published as proposed by
aIlbatlbe Dispatch, miH not contain Sundays
TelegrhFhie: news. How the authors could
| have permitted such statement 10 go forth,
| We caaGot'amderstand Their very. argument
for closing HE paper Saturday nj sht gives the
contratliotian to their ASSERTION. How can a
| paper finished Saturday night rennn tele.
graphic HeWs of Sunday? 49,, ~. ~ s.,
We1e.asseft our proposition that she contest
isa aet betYeen the presses of Richmond, but
bestJeen .Ie,'Richmondvpresss and Idtat of the
North. s .a,,, na.a.-o. ..4r53
| Enlargement of the Dispatch on the SUBJ
work on Sunday, is not an
raw. -, nters, who evidently labored
.anatA . ssay than. they, ever did on
., . o'I'i4 one who ever saw Hewspa=
sa1aa. Va 19I sailors doe net ~ work on Sun
!. ' i hEsai.r ling chap}aind a away with
-. nj The chalTfaih iIll,}l Ind puide