New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-11
SUPREME COURT-SrtciAL Tns-Def,re Judge MTcruL
DECISIONS
Lvnde AIT T. D. Cowenho,en. Smith & Knapp, and Sutton
Mitchell. JL
II is very nlain from the nraXer of the conn

plant which : that smith & Knapp may cnrnp-lei pay
,lesd To them $ X. had apparel
BEEN h"d "ra, them from ,Rs, tine Y, The pSntf had no sh
h, me bu only for such rent accrued after the acton
commenced The defendants night then N appearing snd
putting The plaintiff chose also To take reference
TO show that n yere "a aIrear Tor rent when IA. acton T'
udsnts therefore right attending the reference They
no claim ss hem event as e..ee Of h debtor and they being
ready either the Court mgh direct there no such
extraordinary litigation before the retire. a. to induce the Court to
how much Of the OF the reference caused by
matter. Sheh X succeeded and how much IN h'- IN which
they filled "a whether The ecfes found properly them or nn
when be- reported fact AGAINST them They should therefore have
deducted from the 10 be PAID by them They have been ery
low moving 10 amend the judgment a. 10 have their cost al
lowed 10 them and they make imperfect Tor IN" delay
but m he excuse sufficient seeing that the delay has caused no
7 u Covuho,en the principal debtor oppose, the confirmation
Of the referees the alleged ground that this u was seth"
adjusted sis and costs aud that hall Of
and son p yse and that about 800 ae
.@ay paid 20 The pan'h counsel by sutton one S h 81 ,n
sqi ,houd be secured y the confession OF judmn the defend
cost in can and hat the judgment stand
cuny that the judgment accordingly confessed BY ID ana
hd SKIS - paid To plaintiff counsel by S'"n the lessee h'
that The def udi Cownhoyrn had sven assurance, ih q n
"t p1 w. The costs. The pain,S say, tn. put an eni TO
Yet after i- the sSsi 80 Wa received from SUI
linn Th shows that Tie non~y va ,c'"v,i
part Performance Of the rsnal aTranemcn that So ~ houh
tIfoie I've a.o credited 10 r. d c a. My TO- ~. wh-ni
pad d-t aSto Snon gwen and the am t
reported ly due by r ID C. must be reduced accord
n PAINT, the judgment this acton w' to remain as
with the continuance OF the Agreement 20
psuf should with the re eenc~ m this act
the so without trlu' tnr thercn'ts ana
D. and M counsel should assent oih n"ri That TIE c'h
payucr; g. thus e obtained from H. II APPEARS
plant that har-h ceug IA
sren between pair counsel and the dctenitn l. u G.
Tbs NAV very naturally led mund-snHp c the
agreement parties ls dhcni to Reconcile the relation
Of the ss - aId OF The Judgment confessed 10y l. d. q ana ~ ms
only security for him with the emil rennnci
the settle A. however The
council understood ~ hs ahdv that h,
action be- ,oniaurd aud the agreement be- rnd may he
pr,pcr allow judgment To- BE- entered here d~doims
The plaintiff delivering the confession Of judgment and
proper release 10 J. ID and hs son therom and eerns
ON order that the sOutnued 90 suit and
taking relief : Ssan-i hun
Neither party have costs agan. the other on these mot ns
a. neither entirely ~ the nshi.
l,nd agL l. ID Covrnhoy~n. smith 4 knapp and sutton
hsdl debtor
croI-a judgment subsequently confessed hv ID" d-iOr ani NJ
SON 10 release sutton the the latter stH
2and and settlement Plaintiff claims that the
through which deued The Court considers hU
smith Knapp tenants entitled 20 Their n cUsal-o that
Of tn s - proof of ri-rnt ia sn'ut
my De- entered hous Nj and surety Tor balance deduct
ins The s5l g. Sc Noco>t, 20 orsn parties hesr motions
Richard Cowley ast. Mann Louisa Coslcy
suit Tor divorce ground o. nhdcy Divorce granted