New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-06

j. Aoo o4sls VI IuIafe arrAnsemcnt- rs utu ~ ~
ore word about agreeng 10 y after ~ hsi sesn n'
counsel Dr. Parker distinctly understood ta&i tae
paper Was b be published az I'D For not only y.
tns ploihins Of this ccrrepo1oencs or Of the Gso'
Tor WHICH Sss ,uoAttuie. the drit Of our Haoi 10
tervie~, and impiedir every stage Of but Dr. Par
ksr seemed 70 70 thlnk Irat they Ssrs 10 be pap
hshed inIns aisely, and stated to h that should
noipnoilsh them til Mrs Stowe had seeo the 4
lheie was but sngie qualification % D.. Psrkers
assent ana that vas that hs SCI should N 'ke
oplfenons TO TIE coTespond-Ice. told HIN tnAi
would 90 Immediately TO NJ. Butler and va n aisr
few miautts shook hands with bin and left, shd
sssin that should 40 al once g. Mr. Buffers or
and ADDED hat shou tell Mr. BlEsr from bin thai
he was saiisasd With n NF Blder Nss. aAt ~ all
professional! euqu, ne, man who employs counsel IS
bound 10 make 10 copclusive agreements without hrst
fully committing him, thee Il NJ DOUBT But Ia tails
case tue Whole effort Of bis counsel ha1 need y pro-
cure such settlement ibis and 70 snOg surprising
that one not veIsed in legal should regard sa:A
scodr'e % 10 here Indicated, With satisfaction Bat,
dshi OF wrong, my duty Is 20 stat, the ,sots ~ ID 20.
CURED ana Dot 10 account Tor d.. lsrlers treatment
OF his counsel
went straight 70 Mr. Butler, and read the original
card ard ihe correspondence. To the card "a 90.
jeetso, as wholly insufficient To tas pond ace.
ne stated - me- NJ particular o5ecdOn provided was
fsil,l-ctOry 70 Dr.. P6k-r hsve taken the liberty 70
ssk Mr.. Buffers attention n my statement Of tee re-
'uits uf M iG;ervisw wh him aud take pleasure In
complying With the rPquess to puoli,h bis letter.
LITER or D. ,. BUTLER rs.
Nrr.YosE. TUESDAY. Oct. + p52
you are about T. make ia eaol q the
Gently ps. hsd in the papers havns talsn place
betv bev Dr. Psrher and Ms Harriet 5secher Stose
yoa ssse 70 Tie lnte"le bad oetsea you saG m so GA
tie tn Of June aIS say 10 respect it, 70 the card No.
buNsr or -eec s. wholly isuHcent TO ths e1rrespood
cue ne a'co % ne 10 Partc" Ar % -con pIoFar0 II IS
satisfactory 70 DIR r4rkerr You requ 70 say, whether
t1e 's ement above quoted couons ny recollection
Notwihst ndns my professional reiaons 20 Or taster
eopsosr X my cay 70 an'Sei ina question; AID thee
fore slate In rspy 60 10 that - tsI as goes 3 90 Tess
Bat IS que 70 myself ~ say, that ala ao drsam zoe
rublesuon Of the proposed correspondence until tshoud
he first nly ssseD'ed - feed ard ssnf ~ the resPse.
psrties nor until after o. Pake s. RS rart 80
should have had the onoortrnirv # consulng his
counsel Tbs supposed ne would 10. while Won wer t1
Obtain n YOU could tine Mrs Stove
70 which, when my cee you pressed doabt
have no recollection that told me that Dt ftsksf
would n the sub sct but INV eXosstzr1n that
be would 90 the Necessary result OF the relations Il
client counsel e. isiins ustwesn MIN md mf'eli AID
therefore, reserved fr Or Psksrs private consultations
viii ny opini arc advice as 20 question he ant
hnk It nseded to propose me IN regard TO toe hna terms
Of the correspondence.
statement
l AN, very respectfully, your obedient servant
B. F. Butler.
Rev. HENRY WARD BEEcHER Brooklyn
inclosed the correspondence 70 Mrs. Stowe and
the following 20 accompany Is. whlch noEe
Is certainly not reversnt ii sdoud oe out Is shovs
the honorable inleatioaS | entertained toward Dr.
Parker.
After crincizing her card, b. az altsnpdog 20 do too
n any things /. = On that account failing G. produce
The impression which sbe desired proceeded TO say
When apy .psosy ' naas before the public it ousa.
20 20 80 Il a. ST 10 gain tor the maze! TIE ced
OF honesty. fsnknels snd honor aud ea IL aersard you
have sugbt 70 say it will be kindly taken, 49,
Nevertheless toos 70 Joel He made wry faces we
ukrTed little will aud in tins shape hs az .sd
g lett 60 But felt bad sbous II SAID to nlm' MI
Parker don't ike the whole thing II you will give ms
pen and Ink ard lsage ms alone Will write one to inI
mine Sc wrote ths inclosed two 'eters as ron nj
tom you an satisfied toat these will make
good impression.
other controversy. mis- tlink lou
Beside am cutie sstsed that hs h1s been msrspesented
In that regad That bsiOg ths case much uue-
quvOcsl statement on that point Then the Statement OF
the way which you got hold OF the t0ias VIII nave nIee
both exeupae you sud 10 shoR 1at he Thought the In
If you approve hi. send coOy in yopr Handwriting to
he viii see 70 sinssTon in bH', Era, ana lndpenfeaf
TIaly yogn, tsisnsd) Hw'''
ieaye for indians Monday
This letter IL decisive Of my fee lngs aud Infections
toward Dr. Parker. and my only hesitation about pub
nahlng IL H. les, Il -houd seem that was TOO severe
With HrF Stowe But our disagreement was never tor
mon ent % 10 the fact of puoic rep rator nor 40 "
,ota should be 'he, Iep4rahoni but simply rs % ho~
much OF how ftle CO lsieTa exp nation had boxer oe
Given. Mn. stowe never inchaed, as DR. PA'ser
Savs "to iuar upOn adding the ssIns other mat
,e relating 20 what she considered my position 10 reSpec
10 the subject Of slavery All tna, Mrs $50 Ie wish "a
on this point 10 show exactly Whist Dr. Parker
position and argument on the subject OF slavery naa
been 81 tie 0rigilel ocnr0rGsy, from ~hcn the isn'
Qusge quoted Ia her book supposed 70 be derived
and where the drin Of his argu gave very differ
fnt construction his words from Whist th6y would
have standing alone.
or his personal relations n slavery. Another difficulty
was, that Or Parker though, she ought while she
thought she ought not 70 ke blame TO herself 10 aoy
card 90 be published. ,htfd emosrfassment snf the
only other hons frankly q ersct In regard 20 the
Language uied IN the controversy h0W posis1siy de-
cln,ipR what ,hs would No. declare tnas Or. Parker
hsd ztrer used such language q that attributed % MIN
Her letter u explicit on that subject
Here my sgspcy In Tits TRANSACTION closed len !or
the West On my way home, finding tho correspond
enee in a copy Of III, Tribune, Ia Cincinnati, ! then
fut learned Mrs. Stoves decision ard schoo In .hs
matter On reaching Brooklyn, csnoot tell ~heFher
anazement or indignation was the stroneest on reaf'
Ing the folio vlng from Or Parker 10 Prof Stowe
which had been sent to ne BY Mrs Stowe
Da. FAaEEa TO PROV. STOWE.
'''i Nav YoRy. June So 1851
Rtv.C.E. stowe, D. D-Np Dear SIR. Are you aware
Of tie fact that the letters published ia The ib0ns and
llirc 1L purFoTus " have oeeo written oy myself,
were not tyiitcl, nor signed, nor TONED By
They were drawn 70 by Rev. d. ". Bsechsr and when
read by expressed the idea that they ~ ht 7m soHe
DoGfc1f'on lead 50 he sstrmens OF ne dhc atty Pre-
posec that Mr. Beec should show IT, % my counsel
hr Butler ard that they should be made the subject OF
This was the undersisndiI when re separated mean
Mr. Rescher 81 myself have heTd nothl'g rom Mr.,
learned that thes sstsri lad BEEN puoed without moal
fcsiion. ei7'ou ny ha9irlfsse o, o., onset =.
rot have mad repeated eHOts 10 see MIR Butler since
my return or have been abs ut But he ha, been Ous OF
town sDd have vet learned nothing from him
t has apps ETed un~s 70 come nut aud 1sny pup
hcly authorship Of the letter tioed 70 Toy may
has, got the press ~ some mistake OF t1Td pefyG %
whom th az have bsen entrusted tor esno9t yet be-
Heye at either Beechsr MIS- 5o would intention.
ally suhole publ ation, aud pfeisrAat 80 mud
has the psy, Of paln IL mistake rAhsf han tna!
,he oud appear n have thing oeNtrs rdinary sso
pueh letters oven ny without either my Signature
or consent.
IL has seemed 10 all along. that il would have been
well Tor you to have abou tins burness
cannot stand be gje puOil soliciting
10 favor from Mrs stowe % Be- sht before hs p1o-
ic wish her herself right IN rsspec 10 what she
mas done In relation 10 ! an not tmpsuent allow
time Bot Il Is not matter fer cimpromi'e a. i There ere
wforg both s,des CO rot wish 70 a'ct Mrs. Stove,
would not knowingly consent 70 her dong aoyning on
my account that would BE- idsr the crcan sancs the
very best hins for her character and Ter reputation
CbTsan Had not better come on and ses me
have had my full share Ct trouble so1ut the business aud
in ny 70 settle the matter smicaby hays
borne much more thsn my hiends thins ought to have
done have no dc abt and could settle the whole