New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1852-08-17
TUESDAY MORNING. AUGUST II, 1852
THE cajMP.aIGN REPUBLIC.

TUESDAY MORNING. AUGUST II, 1852
essSs THE CAMPAIGN REPUBLIC.
When the paper, the name of which heads this
article, was first established, we had strong
presentiment that it would be certain to create
trouble in the wing ranks. Its nominal editors
name was a sufficient Warrant for this expecta-
7 ton. Ever since his editorial labors have beer
begun in the Parish Of Jefferson, he has noto.
riously kept the wings Of that parish divided
and in perpetual hot water. With the capacity
Of two-penny whistle he has sought to raise
the clamor of q war-trumpet, and feverishly
ambitious Of notoriety, he knows Of no other
way to ensure it than by attempting to provoke
controversy in the ranks Of the very party
he processes to serve. If it were not for his pre-
tensions totally unsupported by facts) to official
sr9anship, we should waste no time in noticing
attacks in the columns Of his journal. As it is,
ne shall briefly state facts in reply to his edito-
y rial of the 18th inst.
First-When the editor of this paper was well
known to be SO involved, that every sense Of
gentlemanly feeling and manly fairness should
have suggested the forbearance Of delay. the
Campaign Republic of the 10th ult. published a
X most abusive and offensive editorial paragraph
4 referring to the Crescent.
Secondly IT is entirely untrue, as has again
and again been announced in our editorial col
umns, that the Crescent is a sc professedly neu-
\ trail " or in any way g neutral" paper. We
abjure all such humbug; but we do not think it
necessary to swear recklessly, through thick
and thin. to abusive personalities against
Pierce and King. The editor can ask of the
Chairman and chief members of the Wing Cen
trail Executive Committee what full and unso-
hcited testimony they have borne in behalf of
our efficient services to the wing cause: they
will hardly say half as much for the Campaign
Republic, unless their courtesy be extraordi-
narily liberal.
Thirdly-It is entirely untrue that we have
been in the habit Of attacking prominent wings
I'VE doubt if the Campaign Republic could
name one whig whom we have attacked-unless
it instance complacently its own distinguished
conductors. On the contrary. to our agency,
more than any other, is, we believe, due the
closing up Of the widest breach ever known in
the wing party of NewOrleans. But some par
ties may owe us no thanks for that.
Fourthly-1f the editor of the Campaign Re-
public permitted himselfto be deceived by pub
aioa'ion VI cer'aln wings as uelioora's' WHICH
slipped into our columns during our absence,
and now wishes to throw the burden of response
bility on our shoulders, we are very willing to
receive it: he has already on his own more than
~ oan oaiiy
rnenis-As ior ori'io.slng ele oampaign ne
paoilO Wi'noue readlng ~ We lei' nee 70 40 So
Nneu esefy person leauins ~ answered our M
4uiy sefy coolly on' 'hefe s Is mourning nucn
~ ~ -.
!, 1's " tie e o. l's An.eioouree WIN
~ AiSmoeis =. ene oensiai oonllii'tee' we can
assure nini' ~ rs AhoWn e Y 70 De- IN every re-
speo'' sefy slenuef' VIZ never Knew MN 10 De
pios0no ~ any neeeing "a 'ne COMMUNISTS anu
PAoes ' ~ ae1i'' .n0mo'is y, - 'eii us i'e
~. nas na,e aiso neaiu . arg nulhoer
= sne '''' n,.nipefs say liey KNOW h'.ie OF
1'o'ls y 'ne eoi'oi " ms aPer-acNiio"ieuge
w oi'iio'--'n" aie anoyee al
- ra-'.s:s.a.,s p' ~ ass' por,.oa ''s
4 ~. Gs'.'ely u
~. - 'i-1' w $50
I, 90 - ~, -' N i1ep''o ~
,a;4.. .,,,..a; r -. g ~. r A,
"s p0ss.ssi " "ns ~ ",e ss'ie.' y '"e
oe-A',a1 r''sss.' ile 0'i '''niS n'' ~ III Nv
90. se 70 - ~. Ii.- e., i.
y 'io oen'i.'i oolinii.''e 0io en-
6'aeec dnythsng 81 the edato'' and only as they
WORLD endorse any paper which stood IN need
from the Indifferent courtesy Of gentlemen
r:..L.l,-- M r,.-...-p =