The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1852-04-06

YERs proposition as an addition 10 the original resolu
ton OF Mr.. JACKSON.
put BY Yeas and nays, and i was 80 orderedyeas 100
Mr. AyERErT again moved to lay the whole subject
Mr. POLK made point OF order, viz That this mo-
ton having twice failed il was not competent TO renew
II a. at this sn stage :, Of the proceedings
The SPEAKER ovefrnled this point OF order. and the
yeas and nays being next ordered the motion to lay
on the table, i was not agreed toyeas "a, nays loa
Mr., SACkETT said that being DESTROYS ito stop aga-
ton" he would move to adjourn which motion he
called the yeas and nays.
Mr.. 5. subsequently, withdrew the motion to adjourn.
On motion OF Mr. BEALE, the resolution and amend
ment were again read from the Clerks desk Tor the in
/ formation OF the House.
The yeas aud nays being called and ordered on agree
amid which Mr. ALLISON desired 10 ask question Of
Mr.. JACKSON. He wished to know whether, il this res
oution be adopted to-day, the same necessity for its
adoption would not arise. rttta
[feIe members SCALED to odere all over the halIl
The question being put on agreeing TO Mr.. HILLYER's
resolution as an addition TO that of Mr. JAcKsoss was
agreed to--yeas 1903. nays IA
The question next recurring agreeing to the resou
ton as amended, the yeas and nays ordered upon
| Mr.. MEADE demanded that the question be put upon
each Of the resolutions separately.
/ Mr.. CLlNGMAN desired TO have the resolution of
Mr. JACKSON also divdedo have separate questions put
on each branch OF that proposition.
The SPEAKER decided that this resolution was not
divisibe under the rule.
Mr. STANLY consnded that Mr.. JAcKsos's resola-
ton embraced two distinct propositions and that. there
fore. Mr.. CLINoMAss motion for It's division was in
order.
Mr. S. then appealed from the decision of the Chair
After much confusion and conversation, the Chair
planned his decision, and
Mr.. STANLY withdrew his appeal.
but called 10 order ali oysr bs ha was
Mr.. MARSHALL, OF Kentucky, contended that the
question could rghully be dividedone branch decla
ing that the constitution should be obeyed and the other
he n Gc n he m nta.
nance Of the fugitive slave law.
Tie SPEAKER remarked that he was ready to decide
the question: mooed by Mr.. M, whenever he would
point out precisely where he designed have the
Mr.. MARSHALL then proposed to divide the original
resolution at the end OF the word 'out"
The SPEAKER decided that there could be no reada
bic proposition in the balance Of the resolution if SO d.
Mr. MARSHALL appealed from this decision.
Mr.. JOHNSON, of Ark ansas, moved to lay the reso-
luton the table; which motion the yeas and nays
were called and ordered.
motion TO adjourn here made on which the yeas
and nays were called and ordered it was not agreed
yeas 81, nays 115.
Mr.. EDGERTON renewed the motion to lay the reso.
luton as amended on the table, which the yeas and
nays were called and ordered.
Mr.. GENTRY asked whether. il the House adjourned
at this time, this subject would be the first business in
The SPEAKER decided that it would be.
MIR. CLlNGMAN made, at this point. motion TO ad-
joum.
Mr. MARSHALL, OF Kentucky, contended that until
the motion 10 lay The table had been decided il would
no, be competent to put the question the motion to
adjourn.
Mr.. POLK was willing to adjourn il the gentleman
from North Carolina was DESTROYS OF marshang his
forces
Mr.. STANLY desired to know whether The gentleman
from Tennessee alluded TO him.
[tIere there arose cries OF order !" " order ~
The CHAIR next ovenuled the point of order made by
Mr.. MARSHALL, OF Kentucky.
The question was next put on ordering the yeas and
nays on the motion 10 adjourn.
Mr. CLINGMAN Withdrew the motion
Mr. FOWLER renewed it,
And the yeas and nays being ordered upon his motion,
II was not agreed to--yeas 81, nays 1903.
The question was next put on Mr.. EpoERToNs motion
10 lay on the table, and II was not agreed toyeas G5,
nays OF.
MIR. BUELL. moved that the House do now adjourn
On which motion the yeas and nays called and
ordered, when il was not agreed ioyeas 81, nays Sc
The question then recurring the adoption oil the first
branch OF the amended resolunon-that originally pro-
posed By Mr.. JAcrsosit agreed ,o-yeas ioi nays
Those voting in The affirmative were
YEAS-siessrs Allen, Appleton, Bayly Of Virginia, Bo-
cock. Bowie Bragg, Breckenridge Brook, Brown, Buby
Cabell, Caskie Clark Cobb, Curtis. Daniel Dlvs Das-
Ewing
German, Grey Hail. Hamil'onI HAMMOND Hart, Have,
aowsd nse aS Aud Hy' oha:oa
James Johnson Jones Of Tennessee, Kortz Landry,
McMuiIin Meade Miller Moore Of Loaisians. Morehead
Murray NabeI Ouiaw, fatker OF indiana Peasee, Penn,
Phelps Polk, Price, Richardson. Riddle, Robbins. Robin
Ross Savage Schermerhorn, Scurry, Seymour New
York, Seymour OF Connecticut, Smith, Stanton OF Tenne
see Stanton OF Kentucky, Stevens OF Nav York. Stone.
MIA, vensbe, Walsh, Ward, Watkins White OF Kentucky
White Of Alabama, Wilcox, and Wliams-loi
Those voting in the negative
NAYSsessrs. Aiken, Allison, Ashe Averett, Bailey OF
Georgia. Barrere, Bartlett Brenton, Brown Of New Jersey
Buell.. Cable, Campbell OF Ohio Campbell OF Ilinos
Chapman, Clingman, Conger, Dean, Doty, Durkee,
Eastman, Edgefton, Floyd, Fowler Gaylord, Goode-
Of Pennsylvanla, Ives Jenkins johnson OF Ohio Jones
Of New York, King of New York, Kubns, Manu. c(ueen
Mencham, Million, Miner Molony, Newton, Orr, Penni.
man, Perkins, Powell Rantoul, Sacket Schoolcaf Scud
son OF Massachusetts Tuck, Walbndge, Wallace, Wash
burn Wells, Woodward, and Yates-6t
Mr. HOUSTON moved 10 reconsider that VOTE and
then 10 lay that motion on the table which last motion
was agreed 10.
The question recurring on agreeing TO the second
branch oil the resolution, Mr.. HIILYER's amendment
rs added TO the original resolution,
Mr. MARSHALL, OF Kentucky, raised point OF order
amid much confusion. which was overruled.
MIR JENKINS moved that the House do now adjourn
not agreed to-
The yeas and nays then called on agreeing 10 the
remaining brsnch-Mr. HiLLyER's addition or amend
ment-and ], was agreed to-yeas 100. nays G5
YEAs-Ms.srs. Allen OF Illinois, Appleton OF Massachu-
seus. dairy Of Virginia, Bowie, Breckenridge, BfRg.
Brooks, Brown Of New Jersey, Busby, Cabel, Chan
der Clark, Cobb Curtis, Davis Of Indiana, Dawson
Dean, Dockery, Dunham Edmundson, Ewing, Faulkner
Fckn, Fitch. Florence, Freeman, Fuller OF Maine Gam
bic, Gentry. German, Grey, Hail. Hamilton, Ham
HiIlyer, Houston Howard ngerso Jackson Jolr son OF
Tennessee johnson OF Georgia. Jones OF Tennessee kuhn
Kurz, Landry. Letcher Lockhar Marshall OF California
Marshall Of Kentucky Martin, Mason, McCorhle, Melon