New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-05-01

worked ~ various capacities
n 90 Wben were the fir. India rubber goods vuI
lE NJ factory or the first metallic ruoocr soooS
sssJe 20 your knowledgel
A thnk il was IN 1873 r IT'D cooaya,r
I,e,er also 70 the testimony OF Henry D. "oouJ0''
vol | Plaintiff = Ev old pare .lO
o., 90 Did YOU ever the defendant Horace n Day
MT Spsibgfeld have an interview VITA h t"e'e' "'
In the summer Of 1913 met Mr. Horace H. Day near
the door of the factory al Springfield a. ne came 10. ne
asked II be could have the prvese OF looking al the wolH
told him that against the rules OF the factory
He said that be was well acquainted with my I DIo nm
Charles and he there, that he woald 'e MN
40 through and examine the works toid MN ne wa
etairs and told him would call him down dio 90 anu
y brother cor veIsed with him sometime, but dd not sno
aim throueh the building. 49, Of
refer slso to the testimony Of Christopher Meyer "a
1pS yan ever Nors sor Horace IL Dayf A. did
3--Wben did you work for him n AZ ~ $3.50
I'm wbs, bns,pess was Day then engaged a In tue
manufacture Of cloth AID s9es o. Is AZ that time
did Day use any sulphur A. lie diu nol he Artificial
Sid be cure the goods 50 manufacturer " "''
MA he n.e White Iced or any other oxyd oflead or me-
tsic salts in such manufacture a; ne Si He dried
s~In what manner did he cure his soodS H. ii'
9~Do your as TO his mode Of ma a Theg d.
70 the whole time you were working ior MN Ia .lo hi,
IoDd Won ever hear Mr. Day, or any one ese sO % l
establishment while you were b IN the anufac:are of
goods 4. did not o.,.r ora If lead or metallic
that artificial had been used by him in the
,process of curing his goods A did not. 10 nav,
time in The year 1872 was it that you lett Days
employ1 A. In March, 1872 .-.;o,.s ~ the nro
XII any Of the ingredients above mentioned or ths pI
~ enrnr by artificial had been used by Day WINS
were in his employ would you have been hkey 70 Ano"
eweTe YOU acquainted with all the processes through
,xhcb tbe goods the manufacture, OF thal "eie ~
Sxvere NOT the goods so manufactured njurousy at
fected BY heat and cold 4. They were
o,es s~Was Day engaged in making experiments while
YOU were with him. in the manufacture Oh lhoia'nu"'
He answers-He was not, except what made.
refer now to the testimony of NJ f. WEBB, ram
shs Ev new, pege l24 In regard 10 another VI uooa
years workmen by the name OF Joseph w. harnan,
whom Day employed for the purpose OF hnding OUT
more OF GoOdyears secrets III, u,
HsImsn, in Days employ
Cd ' the hest Of your recollection did he first
Ter the employ OF Mr. Days and how long dd he remain IN
ans ps;i was in the summer Of 1873 and that he
refer again 70 the testimony of defendants witness
and former partner, George Eidrdge Vol w. DEFEND
one, 5l%po You recoect man by the fHarman
On Days employment
So When did he engage for Day to the best OF your re-
collection and belief
4. think it was in i8f5
81 Cen YOU be definite $500.
A. think it was in the fore part OF lot r.,
81 Did YOU learn where Hernan came from ,
/ haye heard that he from some OF the Eastern
Qsss' 80 sd you know Joseph w Harman whether o.
not he worked for Goodyear a. SPngeio 3d. WIZ" "'
where old he go from Springfield e,,.
A. knew bin; he worked for Goodyear at Springfield n
1913 or 1874 understood from linn he went from Springfield
20 New-Jersey 10 work for Horace IA. Day. 49,
Also 10 the agreement itself between Day and Hartman
in Days own handwriting. Bishops testimony piani
EXMlBiT, L. No. 10, the par, Of complainant :.
have this day contracted with J. W. Hanan to employ
him my India Rubber Factory for one year from tins Gate
20 the India Rubber and Patent Leather manuactory bust
hess exclusively 10 the benefit Of my establishment and %
employ himself the most advantageous way tor workman
20 serve us and agree pay him The OF two dollars per
day for every days work he does
SAMUEL r. Syms Signature torn ohl
New-York Sept. a. 1913 $50
January lei3 he exploring sources from which he
could learn a secret. secret which he swears he
possessed In all its particulars eleven months before
Well what does he meant What is il he says in that
letter which he Day, wrote and asked Cutler to return
10 him-aDd 1t returned to him, rs Cutler swears
Now have called upon Mr. Day to produce that letter.
and he does not produce IL. We with TO see IL and he
will not let us see H. We with to be taken from his
folio and placed the files of this Court He will not
permit IT, Long ago, may IL please your Hones, sitting
as student Outside the bar, heard that eminent man,
Tbeophius Parsons in case OF this kind, with terse
and strength, which your Honors know, belonged
% everything he sad and wrote to the jury Gentle
men, tell you matter OF sense, and justice and law
that everything shall be taken most strongly against him
who show, and wont show That Is true.
Now / have concluded The evidence winch propose
60 submit to the Court contradict the statement In the
answer, which | read at the commencement OF my
observations. submit 1t to the most candid and most
charitable and most ndugent Judgment OF this Court
And | invoke the pronunciation of that most can
did, moot charitable, and most indugent considera
sion Of this Court, upon the question whether that
averment In this answer-direct, positive, material
In the highest degree, not entirely overthrown by
numerous witnesses, and some OF them Days own.
Overthrown too by his own correspondence not to be
denied and byhis own course of conduct for months
nd fhs vh wholly Incapable
would leave all that, but have a passage or two
more. In Harlows testimony plsnur s proof, old
page, sol, conversation occurs between Mr. Harlow
and man by the name of Armstrong.
"Qucs is. Did you ever hear conversation between
Samuel T. Armstrong aud Horace Day respecting any i'm
provemen of Mr. Goodyess IN India Rubber, and yea
what It. where, aud when
FMS did hear conversation between Mr. Armstrong
and Mr. Day. in Roxbury the particular words that were
uscd cannot remember but the substance Of them was
that Mr. Day said he had heard that Mr. Goodyear had made
new Improvements IN heating India Rubber bat thai
It would like ali the Of his improvements that
Ia worthless Mr.. Armstrong replied he guessed Mr. Good
year would get tired Of building castles IN the air after
awhile There other things said at the time but
nothing else respecting heating Rubbe This conversation
TOOK place Roxbury India Rubber Factory the time
che Company sold out their effects which wss-I am moi
Ssssiou T" sas in the XII Of IS is4o :'' '' ~
And In this connection, wish to present another moi
unmporaht part of the evidence in this cause in
The testimony OF Jacob g. Jackson page 999, in plain
tif's old proofs question ~.
ue Have you ever heard Day say anything about Good
years suits against him. what he would do Goodyear
prevailed in them'
sns Ihaye hear him cav il would not stop him if Good
year did beat him, which he did think would be one
chance million He said that he could put his factories
Unto the hands OF friends and they could run them"
That In exact symphony with what he told Cutler,
when Cutler said to him, you may expose yourself to
be sued" al viii see to that"
hold this up unlawful in the United States Court,
and In any Court In the world l shoad be glad TO
know what persons among all the respectable and de-
cent part of mankind, would unite confederates
nay, may II please your Honors legal language,
~ wOut Horace Ill.
Judgment and the process Of this Court
There Is q criminal side 10 this Court Connected
with this tribunal there is Grand Jary who ndct
for crime, and among the rest for conspiracy against
che Government Of the United States for the obstruc
ton Of its laws, thwarng the execution of the judy
ment of its Judicial tribunals. There is known TO the