New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-07-29

thew attempted to push H. The door opened and
Peterson rushed In with his knife drawn rs II ne To-
,eoded IN st the Captain One Of the men struck the
Captain Nth behaving pin. Inc not was many
qured by the assistance OF the Captains Of TIC vessels
which lay near
In defense Il was stated that Dunn took NJ part 10
the difficulty but ttrove n keep Pa,erson VINO was in
oxicated quiet and that the captain caught hold OF him
and drsrpec him IN the hAtchway and II was tnen the
other advanced insisting that Dunn should be 70.
leased IL said that the prosecution was nov
comueu ced t the had brought suit for wages IN
the Marine Court The Jury found them guilty.. e.
There second Indictment against Peicr.on io r
asssulting the Captain with dangerous weaPVn'N w
which he was also tried. and found guilty. 4.
DEATH OF JUDGE sANDFoRD-Mr. Hall, pis'tic.
torney stated rhar the sad inteiiiRence mas l,r
that Judge Ssndiord has been cut nown uy s "a
hand of death 10 the midst Of bis career OF ~.
he has been summoned from these eaftny ,..
TO another aud higher sphere sn Io..-ar
column bs, been suddenly broken the oss.oy
@ IN Sis,bo,ced an arrow which no human
shield can re.ist As mark OF respect Iol 'Ie 49,
and as a mournful reccolec'ion oil 'n r 50 ~
,eeu cd and hOnored, move tnh the Noui' ""J'-"'
and the cause be eDtersd on tne mnWe" Ill ann
Indge Bets responded, 10 which ne PAD nigu 5on
,l;o.rtt the worth and character ol Judge An 'Io
Conf 3, adjourned and the proceedings oFderea0 %
entered on the minutes.
srpRy,r CoURT-Special Term-Be-
E,. yuoae EdwarSs-D tqth Of Judge S1ndi0rd-
. NJ r. beSt Emuet addressed the Court Tie sald
=, ~ @ rnesncboIv duty had deyoyed upon hn. %
sntouuce the demise of Mr. Justice saadiord
The information bad this moment reached hIh,
and he confessed that it hsd entirely oisaoei nin
from armour chg the sad event Ia the manner l.
/ oeserved Tue Bench and Bar have sus ansa
loss which cannot easily DC repaired "a" . 49, 80
sttepeed with painful circumstances. he oied away
from almost all his family ard AZ great distance rom
his bone One of his brothers, lEd"adi a uisiiu
! euished Member Of the Bar, between wnon shd tee
ceceaspd there existed the most act5 nate attach nf
! IL hos. IN Europe Mr. then paid high tdcute 70
The ability ord character Of Judge G and moved 81
marx Of respfct for his moy thc the Court a urn
| Nh Beni F. Butler seconded the motion. Eis voice
| treFnbed and be seemed affected even to tfafs. tie
said II only since be came into Court that ne hsu
heard the Intelligence Of bis fds death. IL mad been
mis- good fortune know the distinguished deceased
% befu7e he had seat on the bench. his gualhci
ions for that high office Uerc known 10 all he ~ou'd
ueDtop ore fact - show the estimation in whcn ne
! was h,ld held by his brethren IN the eencn "uen
he fret volume of Judge landlords Reports Chance'
~ art cared be MIR the late Cnan ellOr Kent,
az .aat great ust expressed 10 him the admiration he
felt on peIusng that wsIH and said the opinions were
the most mssteIly be bad ever read -
| JUDGE Edwards replied Judge SfndfOrd, he said,
was "A man whom we all knew, and tor whom we all en-
ertsined the hi regard tie ca ne to the Chancery
| bench when he was, comparatively speaking, young
| man and a. q time when there accumulation OF
business which would have inInidated almost any
oher nan and the satisfactory manner 10 which he dis
charged the duties Of that Court are known 10 ths bar
Judge alter other remarks ordered that The Court be
ADJOURNED
CoURT or COMMON PLEAs.-Spec i al
| Term- Before Judge y.-Death ofJadge Sanford
| @ Ellis Eco addressed the CCurt In remarks eulO
pis,ic ofthe Character Of Judge & and moved that the
Court out If respect t. bis memory, adjourn. The
motion seconded, in appropriate remark' by g. H.
Smith, Esq, responded to by Judge DAILY, and the
Court adjourned.
MARINE CouRr-Before Judge Lynch
Olirtr Ddri5O7 Bgt GeyGlntHa DORadL-This &C
fixtures Of No e3i Broadway and vas an action upon
| a covenant claiming the amount Of sl5J 10 due and
pay able in advance the let Nay, 1882
IL appeared that the defendant leased this furniture
and fixtures for five years and for the nOnpay ment OF
rent for the same the defendant cOveDanted with the
plaintiff that he failed TO pay the rent OF the furniture
| he might resume possession OF tho same, being In
value 80 3f The defendant ny this agreement bought
the furniture of the plaintiff in Nay s5, and agreed 70
pay monthly in advance one sixtieth part OF mo pur
chase money every month for five years, when full pay
mens would have amounted 70 the original cost OF the
furniture. Nj having paid the rent for May, 1882 the
plaintiff on the 10Th May took possession OF the furn
lure according the prOviOns OF the agreement be-
tween the parties Having done this. the defendant
answered in this action that the rent for the month Of
| May 1851, forfeited and could rot be recovered
II appears that the defendant left the house No 81
| Broadvay and went into house OF Broad.
way and Twentieth st., where he set mp new estao
shment, being that of French restaurant This was
the made out by the proofs between the parties
on trial The Judge having heard the cause gave udg
ment for the plaintiff for 81 10 according to the FOL
| lowing opinion
The acts Of the defendant su1unted 10 a consent that
plsutiti should possession of the property, and
by plaintiff act ia JesuDiDg the possession Thick he
put end to the contract and think IL would be no
uuabe for bin claim rent Che payment In advance)
after he had required full possession and whole control
Of the property From hGsy erdatad0H OF the subject
baye come 10 the conclusion that the rules applicable
10 the eviction of of real estate do not control
| the of personal estate Under the circumstances
of this case there must he Judgment for plaintiff for
81 TO- equal to half months rent for the use of the
| furniture up TO The time plaintiff took possession.
| AbyGhdm Mcbride act. PetGr Craa.ford.-An alleged
| balance due contract and extra work for building
Two bouses in hing st the price of which vas 81 400
Various defensGs set up Judgment for plaintiff
$50 90 being S3l on original contract and s2} 80 on
| eytra work