New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-01-01

Mr.. orc claimed that he mus, read the whole ex-
cept slight irrelevant reservation.
Mr.. Van B. did not propose to read all
The Court said the rule is, that party can rea
such part of the affidavit he pleases, and the oppo-
site sde atterwaId read such parts as he peases
Mr.. OC. said he called for the whole, except what
has been stated.
Mr.. Van b. replied
The Court said the effect is to be considered after
ward II does no, matter who reads It.
Mir. Van b. read part, in which Mrs. +: SAID IN
reference 10 what happened, he said SAID ne h41
always been afectonate attentive and indllgen'-
he has been so TO within two years Oh the Consu'io
letter
Another point. Mr.. F. never found me standing be-
tween the knees of Mr.. JAMESON nor WITH bus n inds
on my peis son, norm any lncecate posltloh never
wrote 70 Jameson after Mr. r. founQ tue Consueio
letter he never spoke to me about j. what MIR r.
says as to Mr. J. and myself at Cincinnati or else
where, is untrue.
another: As to the allegation that received visits
from j. after the Consueio letter there is this truth
about Il saw J. at Cincinnati, and he promised,
In Mr.. FPS prese nee, TO bring me some music wnen
he came TO Newly ork and he called on me IN I'D
ST., and treated him wha, he considered coolly ne
never called on me but once the hrst conversation
between Mr. F. and myself as to the Consuelo letter
was later than January Is. lsi9
Another: never concealed the Consuel0 letter, nor
did Mr. F. find anything In it TO show cOnduct-oe-
heve he found the Consueo ietfr after Is January
Mr. Van B. proposed to Rad the statement as 10
the Consuelo letter in Mr.. FORESTS alda'it as 20
the contents OF the letter. and the manner and cir
cUmstances under which It was discovered.
Mr.. orc. commended that Mrs. Forests affidavit
must first be disposed of he has read parts calculated
to do injustice and has not read anything yet 10 snow
the necessity Of a reference TO Mr. F.s affidavit
Mr. Van B. said il was to be explanatory. lie cited
cases TO show he was at liberty to 90 so:
The Court thought the affidavit OF Ars. Z lnusI
first be disposed of and that before any part is pro-
Mr.. an B. said ne would, then, go on and read the
whole of it, although ne denied the right OF the other
side 10 require It.
Mr. O'C. wished the irrelevant part already spoken
to be excluded. and perhaps some other parts-he
| would look over the affidavit.
MIR Van B. read Have not charged Mr.. +. now
with infdelity, that In another action and he denied
| particular dates, &c, but not the fact L
! gave Mr. +. an opportunity to recede MS charges
| against me have SAID nothing against MI. F. OUT
| what was necessary to the complaint ana 10 snow
| my own innocence when perused Mr.. F's aihia-
Wit Impugning me and my family 1t was necessary
! fer me to act he took me from my fathers hearth
! and now seeks TO cast me of the eXtravagaat
| charges of Mr. f. against me lead many TO suppose
he is insane or mlsied, but is neither regretted
that the rules of the Court would permit Mr.. r. to
introduce in his affidavit about controversy as TO
| Mr.. Macready, TO introduce matters about my
sister, who has stood By me during my trial never
heard anything before against MI: Jameson nor OF
| ANYTHING in regard to him ana Mrs. hunt Ny. r.
never spoke TO me as to anything IN regard 10 j. ne
did not say on finding the Consuelo letter, that any
vmtuous woman would have spurned IL, nor did Mr..
| F say 1t was reserved by Heaven as an instrument
| of my exposure isaid, on separation being spoken
| Of that the public would suppose improperly, and
4 ne thought Otherwise ne said he had no suspicion
of my purity signed paper, IN winch 0elleVe II
was not alleged that was innocent OF Improperly
| Mr.. F. never asked me to take an oath, and re-
| fused, as 70 my purity think the paper was ante
dated by Mr.. Forrest the paper signed was al
terward referred 10 in MIR. F'S affidavit never De-
fore our actual separation did ask for an Allowance
| he said before that he would provide for me De-
lieve when Mr.. came into possession ofthe Con-
| suelo letter he was seeking some ground to repud-
ate me, although he had not thought as TO inquiry
T. leo auphn lbs
ISOLATION: after Mr. +. had been Informed as 10 the
character of the book he did not consider 1t would
| answer any purpose he has declared ne had no
cause to suspect my purify TIL the discovery OF the
! Copseulo letter he sentenced me on the 18th jan
uarv to separation without any cause, and alter
ward said it at that time ne discovered me Con-
seulo letter, but think latter was afterward what
Mrs. Underwood said IN her affidavit to be sent
| by Mr.. F. TO the Pennsylvania Legislature ABOUT
| nv going to the drawers and making expla-
nation as to the letters being gone, is UNTRUE :
never asked Mr.. F. to be silent to my conduct
| no understanding was mad between rs that we
should occupy the same room TO prevent remarks
il was spoken OF as to our separation before ne ound
the COnsuelO letter Mr. +. would not go our TO par
ties but wished that should 90 so without him on
the separation asked Mr.. +. to request Mr. Lawson
| TO call on me, and he asked me what wanted OF
him | said he mad been friend OF my father, and
| wished him TO conduct me 10 Dir. Gndwlns ne
| said he would do so himself when M. +. spoke OF
getting a separation from the Legs AZURE Of Penn
syvanla he said it was on account OF inccmpatohl-
| accustomed TO lntOXlcdtiOn never vas SO IN my
tire II IS true Captain Calcrait, an old friend
mend once or twice vas up one night, all
npht. with my sister, Mrs Willis, and Richard
Willis, but under iustihable circumstances-aw whole
| night what Mrs. Underwood ana GalVey stated IN
their sfdayits is not true they never to it Ill
! a way that could be taken nonce oi--~hen tney 90
it en- be refuted 1t Is not true that the House was
| closed at 10 o'clock when Mr. +. was nome we
had always been accustomed to very late hours
| when went to l6thst IL was not finished Mr.. Ste
vens was the first who entered the bali he has act
| ed against me and my sisters and been Mr. rorres:s
| instrument the course Of Mr.. f. toward me was
| not that of an honorable man toward guilty wife
he made me in every way su0servlent 10 his plea
| sure and convenience as to NJ Magoon, CONSIDER
him a pure minded Christian. what he states as TO
nv SAYING Mr. + and myself lived as brother aud
sister was misunderstood did not suppose ne would
nave believed me capable o. so ImmodeSt and uDbe-
coming a communication which ne mas ATTRIBUTED 10
me | said TO Mr. NJ that sometimes Mr.. r. was mo-
| rose sometimes afectionate and frequently treated
me more like a sister than wife my present course
Of life is not pTodgal norreckless, nor do give ex-
pensiye entertainments to any persons Or receive or
entertain any person or persons OF loose or degraded
| character, as Mr.. Forrest unHuy alleges tno
charges Of keeping unworthy company, and OF evii
habits and character, made against my SISTER Marga-
ret by MIR. Forrest are wholly untrue she mas Deen
a chorister in one of the Episcopal churches for
Mir r. p. Willis was introduced 10 my acQuan.-
ance by Mr. Forrest, in ls3S, and the acquaintance
| continued thencetOrward. the most rieadly
relations appeared always TO subsst between Mr..
| Forrest and Mr. Willis never heard 4 murmur
against Mr.. W. from Mr. z. until the summer OF
! ls49, after our separation when M Forrest ex-
pressed to his dissatisfaction With some article
published By 4lr. W. IN his paper abou! the Asor-
place flo.s, and about Mr. Forests dispute with Mr.
| Macready | never heard that Mr.. :. sus-
pected or charged anv improperly between Mr..
| Willis and myself until eO, 1850. Mrs f. refers 10
the difficulty between Mr f. and Mr.. Macready, and
that it had been said she stated that TO be the cause
Of her separation she knows no cause OF the sepa-
ration except her contradlcng hlm IL regard to his
remark ABOUT her sister. I'VE certainly hac
serious dinerences about Mr. Forests conduct 20
ward Mr. Macready :" says she disapproyed OF ms
kissing Mr.. VI. at Edinburgh and dlsapproyed OF the
manner ne spoke of Mr.. NJ. prior TO NJ: arrival IN
this country IN lSls mad objected 10 MI Fs haolt
OF stating on all occasions his determination TO drive
Mr.. Vi. from the stage. MI +. became angry
with me about H. as he attributed II 10 my English
feeling | assured him 1t was not so: when, nov.
/ ever NJ. Macready made speech which conveyed