The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-01-22

could
nvesd that Would an dss Of tie depth Of that
u eassy @
ne Write 70 S a aRd ss m s Dr.
lieye chat shall do the 70 bo worthy Of yonr
Not worthy Of winning ber-not worthy TO admire
her not worthy to be admired by herbnt worthy OF
what lie possessed, and which he struggling to
deferve -
Believe that shall do tbe utmost 10 he worthy Of your
loy. end now. God ble,s you tnopssnd tmcs own
byess and ,rsel patches Oh how hdoous hey look
lie would say pore. Goa kaows what hs could say
to throw any light this l do not know
why Mr Forney should write to anybody to talk to him
the subject, drunk sober, while Mr. Forrest had
ibis communication in hs possession
Atieu sdieu and when thou Or. gone,
M Sy ssal ss ss %sai Tis gp f!ys s'@s, charm
1hose haloyen hours when in my
When We GENE to speak cf admiration, this remark
seems to reduce the admiration TO the level of under
standings OF The meanest capacity However refined
intellectual and literary people may bs II seems that
the mode in which they make love resembles that of
ordinary mcrtaIs -
Adieu adieu. Bs thine each Joy
That earth can yield, without alloy.
a m be ,ho ins e Fl. ss sSs
sveet Coneuelo.
Adieu adicu When next meet,
Will not not All Y. eadness then ,. rets,at;
And seal Il trp%ph with akios-
What did she say foy 10 h That letter wa. received
by Mrs. Forrest before she went to Pi.tsbuyg In 1t
she Was reminded Ct her declaration oil love, in times
past to this man She was begged of to write to him
and tell him she was happy. She was inquired Of,
whether when she returned, and they met again their
triumph would be sealed with kiss. Now when you
ctme to declarations OF love when You to svowals
OF contdencewhen you to cas ping people in your
arms ard sealing meetings by kiss you come to what
with ordinary mortas is regarded as the evidence of
adultery and but thing have been possibly
proved by US and submit with great respect to you,
that even that letter that alone unless accom-
panied ly declaration oft from hrs Forrest to her
sufficient to stamp the guilt of the party You
cannotcose to the nferencec newt
on it's face that should BE- guilty Of injustice to you and
Offering an insult to your intelligence. in commenting
en- it, II Mrs Forreshad instantly handed this letter
to Mr. Forrest and had said to him sir this man is
crazy writing to me of interviews which never took
place, representing as making avowas OF indecent
lov. to BIN reminding of the attachment bear him
the man is evidently crazy do not take any notice
him This IL what virtuou, woman would have done
Ent what was Mrs. Forests course She concealed
rom ber hushanG kept up the came intimacy. or even
eeetcr with this afterwards than she did before
She Wears to this in her affidavit, and it does not rest
on any testimony which wCs introduced by us (Nr
Van Buren then read portions Of Mrs. For
rests affidavit with reference TO her connection With
Mr.. Jameson and the Consuelo letter, the whole
which has been heretofore pubshed She says she had
oDce expressed sufficient OF the Consuelo letter.
but are left to the power of diviuation to imagine
what size regarded sufficient censure Of II. sup
posc have but rule to Judge Of what do
hnowthat is by what we 90 know-I suppose she made
the same reply to this Gf the case admitted Of ~
hnra Fowers said she did to her, when she told Mrs
Forrest Of Captain Herard'e connection with her
Why, raid che, Anna. it's shame, and when see
e.
have been ia her Judgment sufficient cepsnre for the
offence. What che would have deemed sufficient
cure for the intimacy itself it is difficult to imagine IL
you believe the statement to be true she participated in
this intimacy and did not permit their friendship to be
interrupted by this letter Now, the other hand If
YOU believe tie statement OF Mrs Underwood to the
in which the letter discovered and her
duct at the time Of missing it. then her entire of
it. bad es it actually is, is far short of the truth
that Mrs. Forrest went to the drawer, and found
that This letter was missing. She immediately
fool you have been" That ebe had kept letter
ceslod, ehe admits. She kept it from May, 1913. to
Jenaary lS4s when he discovered it. Mrs Underwoods
testimony shows that when she went to the drawer and
discovered tna gone she spoke Of 1t being missing
and went to drawer st the other side at the head ofhe
bod and opened it. and took cut letters and said II
glad he didn't nd these ttc. and the.e she burned
she subsequently aid TO Mrs Underwood "Mr Forrest
ia determined to separate from me never saw him 90
serious in mis- Ue and she then stated the discovery Of
this letter. Now, gentlemen, do not know what evil
deuce may be required in an ordnsry case, to prove
the CON emission OF adultery between two parties but it
TO b. utterly incredible that with this letter in
evidence and these facts admitted II Mr Jameson fails
70 appear las ohe, persons who honld be examined in
this ceute have also tailed to appear in nsances
1.-THE only one who could explain this transaction who
thown to be. or offered to be shown to be living, when
lie could ctme this stand and deny the aduterou,in
tcIcoursa II 1t s not true; and yet in view OF all this
in view of all these factsn OF these avowals OF love
.n view her preserving and ,ecreng the letter con-
tanning then.-N view Of her afterwards entertain
ing and receiving the man who had written it,
ara keeping up the same intimacy with him, writing
letters 10 her husband regIetng his absesce H. say,
the man who could explain ali this fails 10 appear
the fails present. himself asa witneSs to deny
the Truth of these statements explain them il the
case sduits Of explanation how Is il possible II put IL
&c YOU with great Iespect-how ia IL possible to evoid
the infsrepces which thsss facts inevitably force the
mind. Of the quilt OF the party But geLtlemen
not eft entirely 10 inference this SUBJECT nd now
cs your attention TO the testimony furnished by some
letters written to Mrn Forrest by Mr. Forrest and her
replies and, before doing 90 it TO be proper to
read the explanation Of this respondence because
her eyIlana on Of all these matters is worthy ef being
Of the care (Mr Van Buren read that portion OF Mrs
Forests affidavit wherein she says that Mr. Forrest
tried TO eXtort fcm her confession Of pablity as
well as his letter Of oath of December 1912 hers OF tho
same date in reply and hers Of the 19n OF Decembcr
sl heretofore pubih and by comparing cages "a
tbe,s documents cndeavortd show that sirs estate
men wherein she alleges he had charged herwh
ipadt,y till the date OF that letter untrue Mr.
Van Buren proceeded-1 have thus gentlemen, called
your steDtn the correspondence between these par
ties ard the eyide which in my Judgment Y affords Of
the guilt OF Mrs Fotrestbe fact that 1t produced the
same impression Sir. Forests I'nd as II must pro-
duoe yours-thst be charged her the 2ith of De-
,mber with guilt, when sho omitted TO deny 4 and
lat sulstqueDty by way n after thought, made this
statement TO which have referred. have thus gore
through with the evidence in this case, moerfecty, Ne
aware and wish before closing NV rem6rks. and
thsnlpg you for the and which you have
betowes on them to call your attention to some Of the
general subjects connected with the Gaze and among the
most untftunstc- amongst the most crue features n
hF c9se as regard itis tie fast that ibe silence o
hr ionut in rerect to the charge Tor leu or eleven
hohtih atei ne nal come 70 ki3NlF0kc ~ suiis
ina sugls instance, Tor considerable tne after he
bad hid reason to suspect hcr ~ urged Improperly
tgaintt him evidence tire absence of truth in
what he nov charges ths Hgny iioeraiy and kind
ness which he ex.Edd 70 her n shielding her from
&amo while he lad The evidence il his possession which
YOU VII ray was most conclusive Not man in that
ury box Vi he tbould Gd such letter written to his
wife and kep by her for that leneth Of ne Nho would
not ssy That, not satisfactory evidence of her guilt
u fmnifbed ~ all events gre unds OF sspciOl such
sswtul1 require full explanation. And yet that know
ledge Nr Forrest bad carly a. Janusry lsi9 With this
kut wleoRe, but without the conviction tina. his wife
committed AZ other offence, he wunng that this
single act OF guit-proyidDg no sttempt made to
hect upon lin after sepsis;iug--shoud not be Used
TO her entire Disgrace. Ney more Ap abundant, libc-
~. gnetouf allowance fosde 10 her by him Of 500
per yer which conrrsted With the proofs given tohs
proa.fty shows thst quite hsf OF bis cntns
soecme Bo isy ~ the testpcay In this osss socs, 6s