New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-07-28

", suptItunon' which haunt him from the cradle Il
oOIu's ~" Ieer OF pain, snd inspir-. di.ddu of
feHih Dives,iDg II Of it, t-rror, N c,r,a. -, -
hHnrys eih cncture Of spakes aod he raIeed hv tn
crles ct tIHaroo, but besuutl "a Hyp.rion ltb bIs
OioH WIN 90 ininlortAlst star, and his summons i.
That toio the lDoiah .les were near
To the woT q. seeking G-nDe.-
| When be iapo- vino from woods OF calm
| And ofaf az groves. ara fields ~ BALM
| Blew over the Hay tian seas"
LOUD and continued cheers Mr. Mesgher concluded
by cung the following passage OF Washlnsons Fare.
! we'll Addre,s:
"rrofourdly penetrated with this idea shall carry it
18th 70 the strong tndueemsnt TO unceanns
hst Heaven continue the choicest
Of It's beneence that your union and oothery affection
msy be perp tua; that the tree Constitution, which Is
the work Of your banc may se sacrsdJ maintained that
~ son lrisrsiUn IN every DEPARTMENT mag BE- stamped
with voom snd virtue; that, in fine the hsprinei OF the
people Of there States uldur the of Dsrty may
BE- mace complete by careful preservation ana 50 pTa-
cent OF this blessing wiz acquire to them the
glory OF recommending 1t to the applause, the stecto
ard the adoption Of every nation which yet stranger
| tot"
veheuent cheering greeted the conclusion Of the ad
dress, and the company dispersed.
EIGHTH-AyENUE RAILROAD Superior
! C0itt-specisl Term-Before Judge Bo.worth
Judges Oskley and Duer also being pres mt The par
ties In the motion, side 30 perpetuats the To-
functions restraining action against Messrs Patterson
sherman and others the rigns grantees in the
resolutions OF the Common Council In favor of Messrs
CoDovtr and Others, up yesterday pursuanso ad
jourpment Mr. Brsdy OF the counsel for the plain
us ssltd tia. leave bad been given to plaintiffs 10 pre-
sent additional ahdavits IN support of those already
given but hey have not yet been able swing to the
absence Of some Of the parties and the indsp Jston
her yet ob,siD them. He ssked for further ad
journn ent 10 ensbe them to do In support of his
uoton oflidsy was read by Mr. made by Mr. 5her.
nSr, one OF the plaintiffs, which is as follows
kEw-NoSK 81 PRkIOK CoURT-.,0da Petti1rer ar3
obT., og0iH.t The Manor Aldermen and COnm0Hdlty Of
ME On 81 NtU lOrb, and Others-Clty County OF
New iCTk.ss ECnuno r Sherman one OF the painutts
et.ve famed being duly sworn SAITH that Oliver Casr
LICK spc Geo Law aeria vi ness, for the plaintiff
ME sct -, and of great nOortsrca TO the
plaintiffs have ire dispositions of said CharlIck and
Law on the Igumeni Of the motion to continue the In
junction herein
That Opponent has reason TO believe and does be.
lieve that the plaintiffs III be able establish by the
dispositions of said Charok and Law, that Richard T.
| Compton, The President OF The Board OF Aldermen, sp
piled TO said Chsrick 10 loan procure money 10 pur
chase votes in the Common Council of the City of New
York. to revoke the grant OF the Eishh-av Railroad
give The same to Messs COnOver and other, a
| the same ina ~ done In said Common Council
asO that said Compton directly intsr estsd In the
ssio q ant aud had been engaged for long period
OF time In angling financial matters to the pas
| SAGE Of the san grant in the Common Council
slso That ssid Compton ruptd certain members of
the c. nmon Council whose votes were instrumental In
curirg passage of the sRid graft also that
SAD Compton acted corrupy in the which he
10 said new grant, In his whole eXefuOns that
eno snd IN his hDa attempt complete said by his
usmpston Of the tihce OF Mayor, the 18th day of
June las also that upon surprise being manifested
said COmpt u az he could nc ompish the proposed
act OUty that be ssed that be could have aus thing
he pleased passed through the Common Cou lcii tor
money, even "a resolution TO have man hung from
! OF The trees in the Park
That this deponent has ade dieent search for said
Charch ara repeated application at his residence, to
ascertain hs Whereabouts, and has been informed aud
believes that ssd ChsTck H. ana has been since Thurs
Gay morning l6st absent from the city Tnat deponent
o0 notknOw until several days after his departure from
the city that be absent that be Intended ~
shsept from the lily.
Dtpunel riher sath that as he Il Informed and be.
heve Sir Law s also absent from the ely, and is
tXpcctd for several days aud that laid Char.
lick expected TO return to the city during the course
| Of ne present week f. r. SHERMAN
sworn 10 nef,re me, this Goth day of July, 1854
JANIS NJ SwEkNY, Cpmmis,oner OF Deeds
The following AFFIDAVIT was alsO on behalf OF plain
ti1s:
n !. SUFEMOR CoURr.-Joln Pet'tgyelc and Others
aLsin.t tn, GIoyOT, aldermen and CODmOHdly n The
Gig Of Ntlc- Ink and outrsCity County Of Ne
YORK, Peter b. sweeney OF said city, being duly
ssth that the ls day of July inst order
we G Hs II NE 81 e Essd " OH sd a9f
L. asr his position vuluurarily Tnat said Edwards
sttenoro under sald order with ais counsel Mr. Sckes
OIL Ne 90 day Of July inst and deppnent proceeded 70
examine him the port the plaintiff that during tns
o. the examination oepunent put to said Ed
wards the following question
"Do you know Of any money being paid 10 any mem.
Der Of The Common Council during the month of June
last for his vote to- pass any measure through that
/ body =
That said Edwards declnrd TO answer sail question,
ana his council sId depOi attended before Nc JUS
tct swOrth obtain his decsi 10 the Obligation
OF Edwards said question but in consequence
of said Edeards BIO boos tue Office of Inspector Of
vessels having been summoned to attend the Board OF
H.sh Oh the day at the examination, adj Jurnnent
- ID H.N.r
obtained
Th.i he examination continued to 26:h instant,
but said EdWsrcs bbseLtn nsequence OF sed
illness and sid exauiU alton was for that reason post
poned uhul ri. d,y DeponeDt further saith that ne
verify b. rves rom remarks MADE by said Ed wards In
The bearing Opponent hat ifaid EdWaros required
10 sp.H er said estiC be will do 10 the Affirmative
PETER SwEENY.
Sworn Def me this 9TH day OF June, 1852.
JAMES ". SwLENY, CoAniAsioner Of Deeds
The adjourn inert opposed by Messrs Dodge aud
O'Couor who, with MessIs. Van buren, and Isaac n.
Fowler appear as counsel for Messrs Conover & Co.
M orc conlended that Court cannot review, In
contest bewt en- individuals TO grant of that body,
the action OF motives Of legislative body, and quoted
the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall, Of tne Supreme
Couyt riteo stses in Of Fletcher sAd Peck 9TH
Graz ch to that effect The point denied by Mssss
Cutting end Brady
Asugsestion wss made by Henry T.. Dayies, Esq,
Counsel ~ the Corporation, whether II wOu not %
beer to adjourn the I'LL after Monday next to see
If any action would then be taken by the Board of As
srsLis As The matter stands now, ii Is not proper for
bin 10 take any part il regard 70 it,
The aoj urnment objected TO by Mr. oConor. 1t
was gesfd whether would not be proper 70 mOdi
fy the irjure,i n Tb, WAS opposed by Mr. Cutting
He sio tbs, the two bodies Of men who nave begun
working from the extreme points Of the road, have
nearly met and the road 10 almost completed to Fifty
sr,t.streeL If ib- Injunction Is modified, 1t will ony
sford some opportunity for the defendants 70 come IN
ard interfere with Messrs PetHPrew & Sherman, &C.
MI Brady 10 his remarks sii that tne reservations
in the grAp, dd not auth rize the Common Council 70
take the road from the grantees stth view, directly
remotely. 10 give II 70 another body Of men
L.L- ~ L.. .kcrt El-.,n