Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1852-02-12

the defendant sells intoxicating liquors; lost ayes IA,
noes %.
Mr. MckIe moved the previous question, which was
seconded.
| Mr. Reid moved to amend the amendment by adding
| the following additional section:
SEC. That hereafter il shall not be lawful for any
person persons by themselves agents. to barter
sell any kind Of intoxicating liquors whatever, in any
quantity less than quart at time, keep what
is commonly called tipping house, in which spirtuous
liquors either sold bartered, given away, to be
drunk in said house. oRthouse garden, yard appur
tenance thereto belonging and any person persons
shall violate any OF the provisions OF this section, every
such person shall DO fined for the first offence the sum
Of dollars, and for each and every subsequent VIOLA
ton hereof, in any sum not less than ten dollars
than hundred dollars which may be added
in the discretion of the jury court trying the same,
Imprisonment in the jail of the proper county
ceedlng 80 days. lost, ayes 16, noes 25.
Mr. Miiken moved amend by adding the following
additional section:
SEC That in all trials of cases for the violation
Of the second section Of this act it shall be sufficient in
the absence of direct testimony prove that the
accused keeps the usual implements OF tipping house,
part of Them that drunken persons frequent
ly about his her house that the witness
verify believes that article drank in his presence
intoxicating liquor. But the defendant shall have the
privilege of answering under oath affirmation IN all
these whether intoxicating liquor has been drank
IN about his house not and the credblIy thereo,
shall 6e taken into consideration by the jury
trying the case. Losi-ayes is, noes p.
Mr. Holloway moved TO amend by adding tho follow
ing additional section:
SECTION IA. That in all judgments under the pro-
visions Of this act against any person either for DANA
ges fine. all the property in the house in which the
liquor sold or given away shall he liable 10 execution
satisfy such Judgment and il enough personal
property be lound then real property in which
such liquor is sold shall be liable execution satisfy
such Judgments Prorided That real estate not belong
ing the offender sall be thus subject execution
for the first o1ensc either against the State lndvidu
ais. Lost
Mr. Dougherty moved to add an additional section to
repeal all laws prohibiting the sale Of intoxicating
! liquors >Lost-ayes, Messrs. Dougherty Kinnard,
Slack and Washburn-4 noes 80.
Mr. Eddy moved the previous question which was Sec
onded-ayes 49, mes I.
The main question was then ordered 10 be put which
was upon the amendment proposed by Mr.. Hester
Mr. Hester's amendment was not adopted.-ayes II,
noes 24
The question being upon the cngrossment the bill
amended (by laying the table the second section
prohibit selling giving away Of intoxicating liquors,
to he drank about the premises in which they sold
given away; and by striking out the fourteenth Sec
ton making the property in the house where the liquor
is sold Liable e taken executions under the law il
was decided in lie negative.
AvEs-Messrs Crawford, Dawson, Eddy, Holloway,
Marshall McCarty, Micke, Miken, OJe Reid. SAT-
fer, Teegarlen, thurman, and Washburn-14
NoEs-Messrs Alexander, Allen, Athon, Berry,
Brueh, Cravens, Davis. Deirces Doueherty. Dunn,
Goodman, Hanna, Henton. Hcst'r. Hickman, Hicks,
James, Kendall Knnard Miller. Niback Slack, Sleeh,
Spann, Walker, and Witherow.-26.
Mr. Truman, from the select committee that sub
ect returned the bill dividing the State into three dis
tricts for election of three Supreme Judges, with
amendment striking the bill from the enacting clause
and inserting substitute. The amendment not
concurred in.
Mr.. Dunn moved rc-commit the bill, with instruc-
tons to district the State with view to the election OF
four Supreme Judges.
Mr.. Cravens called for division of the question
which was ordered and the Senate decided
mit-ayes 81, noes IA
The question being upon the instructions proposed by
Mr.. Dunn divide State into four districts it was
decided in the afirmative-ayes p, noes II.
Mr. Dunn presented protest against the action of
the Senate Friday last, in amending the journal of
the previous day, by striking portion OF The protest
presented by Messrs Miller Dunn and Marshal against
the passage Of the House dstrictine bill.
Mr. Berry offered resolution ustlying the action Of
the Senate referred in Mr.. Dunns protest, assigning
the reasons for such action.
The question being upon the adoption of the resolu-
ton 10 voted in the affirmative and Is in the negative
not quorum.
Senate adjourned.