New Orleans daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1851-1866, 1852-12-07
DAILY CRESC CENT.
4 As " OFFICIAL JOURNAL y,si
n EHE e0NsoLIDATBp o1TY on NEW ORLEANS.


- ss=
nrrTrrhT rnrpnAr
Al5aN ~ ~ = = ~ A
. ---1 o',N y p. - : - :. -r
--.-1,.---..
E ..ssss. e -, ,r - & Aa..5
contracts yesterday adjudicated by the Comptro
0n 0reatmen street 70 Patrick Carmody nt W per rum
I'VE WI Jss :, e,,,,,
erson sa nm 1hssps ~ S,vss sssts x Jor
Purees nj II a. = - - ssr,,ss u
FoY psypr round the e,rnd a. f,I.tbofrs nreet
each snperfeiai ward n rnnn nrvfng aaieenta
each spegcial yard q curb sud stcns ir1.bsd
til taIxsY, M And rs,,ts n Jsres i,nckev
aPor layidv BRICK sdevsiks Il, Common street 70 A /
For numbering earts and drsys the Flint District
James q Bsyan AZ iii cets e:rS Ssond District IL
VI 6s.9ss. i ssas sss TSra SssI,ss IL n:
Npiano At q cents essS s - =
The rarEets were Iafnaed ont for year, commencing
on the 1st day Of Jannary ss At TIE T,,ovna r.tss
ST. Marys Mar Tirst pstsict n III no,i Il xsi
Mrst NJ sykst rnrd nv " sss, ~ s;sa, II IA sf
ysssbs Marks sseona ptyic II ~
At s4O5 IRENE Market Second District Ii Frxuciscs
Perryras at Sl505o Port and Washington Market Third
District 10 n Eorot sa1. MsgasiSs steeet Marked
Ilisrfct ID forrad t4ais ~ SI7o1 Tassyvtte
Market Fourth Di.tssssto stephen Iss L $500 ssd
ii soO0 80 Tsssi.Sf - u .Tegfi
lspA ;r,,,n o ~, ,,,,y N, n. q
,hs Assesso, 81 ~ aoO,sn ;st MN:
coDpaeted his roll thesoliowing is rerapitSntion
value q real estate belonging TO Iesaents " ~
80 non-residents,. 2sN sCo
Horses, mares mules, etc.. 2tS00
Vehicles. lI6oo
Capital rested in traffic, seeo0
= eei,, gss.a sstss e7E 80, .---., -
Total value Of property S7aoisloo
in trades and professions is one hundred and
SJrpRENE CouR1F - fg0,tdsnsed Decisions. -
eorge Bischfr ans,Isa rs s,,re,
xp1eal from the Ft striet Of Ma t1riasns Rost
Judge The defendant being sued on three prouissary
notes made bv h,m nayahls 70 bs rrn order pissied n
nas is ss al sxceptos, te pendency 81 another soit
Jt se the ysrtiss ma N tIa q n action
Il %
Nv the co,sft bs,a Had that IN h;.trct JSos s,s
n sysrnIino III arsantinn raysyssS srd ~,
IT tit;on aismIsss1 -A- ~
Cisiss 4Iv;roy. snnalisrf ~ xSs,ch a,,ts, ~.
Comnanv AnSaai rom H. second Dfstrict Cont #
NewDrisans Enss q j For I'D r.asons sssSned ~
~ ~ q, ~
A. sn,silant - 1sorye Iscenre - annei
n,is aga S'rs ~
To,ye /. patsisor arnsists1 rge,.o, N ri,
aaneIIats Anneai from Tird I;s,;ct 1,on,t n
si;S -
i,,d.nens rsnderss for tbs dsS,ssnt
costs IN both courts - -'.
james a. Adams, appellant ps b. f. Hastings Co.,
n,.p 1,s Ui s Sos - Wv
as oupsIs'11s nn S ~,
r argass y fro INC To,t nt
Court Of NsworIsans Dnnbar Judge. Jue@ept rsyersed
ana snas tners os sa1s1 5ne
aa. Mal aa ~ f ~ " a M pan -, s
M I y "a toyt ;.3 ~ ~
ht,s " No. Csts = - = 20, M 0oes' =
W.es ootu vourss' = =, ..u.n. - = .t.saa-
neees Apneai rom the eenn Dtrict Cont of Nev
Orieons sden Judge. Judgment atirnsas
- = ~ ~ VI sv , 80 s.I
stret dor of ss ~
4 amrmeo ~. = : - -. !, :. -, -, :, ).
., nass - 1nraa, fpm If Hnhsr I,s -
he arisr of annea has heen n TN sa On H.
- Aae LEI ~ @ sas ~ w "
H. ~ a,d ~ ad ~ s
bond vtbout the authority Of her husbsfd Appesl ala
The City Of New Orleans appellant IS Miller appellee
Appeal from tho First Justice III the Peace Of tie Pa.
rish Of Orleans Eustis j. This suit instituted for the
recovery 1f penalty Of one hundred dollars for the yio-
ao AZ an Ordinance Of the late sscond Muncipality
New Orleans passed on the 10th Of Noyember 1915 The
appeal is taken 81 the City from the decision * one Of the
lie decided that the ordinance under which tls penalty
vas claimed was null and void that tho act for which
was sought to beenorced was an offence under the penal
laws of the State and that the municipal powers IL ths
city had no authority to impose penalty On that which
laws State made punishable as al, offence
The ordinance provides that it shall not be LAWFUL L
keep within limits of the city game games called
kino oo any other gambling of hazard
| premises, under penalty of SlO0 = i9 =.
1T evident tho other parts Of the ordinance
from the construction which it has always received that
the effect of the ordinance was to be the Suppression o
gaming in this FORM the playing Of the games men
toned. for money HF is'l " II ssS'# Ftle As7s
Our impression is that the offence Of keeping the
of kno punishable under the Act Of March IA 1885
titled san Act to prevent gambingp That act evidently
purports prevent and punish the keeping of gaming
n houses The terms used in it. of banking game,,
banking house present difficulty Whatever as TO its
s canta ~
tbe capital ia owned or furnished by the hose or made
M by the PLAYERS the evil ID tie sae and tie offence Il
the same 7s ~ s. Eaa ,3ll q 7i373'lil = 10
This of iuo we understand To be,f the latter d.
serption 1t is consequently within the statue Of 1895
The Judgment q the court below is therefore will
COSTS. MA ~
n SECOND DISTRICT C0URT-Judge LeG--J1u'
l saseo vs Csmslal Lank e Neg , Is
ana spa nf ala. ~ hax
hasr snsta;ned bn th On a"cns,ns ns sS fs,ra
~ f,yn;h y IN - aontraat @
Tbs niain asaas that he Is tba n,onistor af hath
ing At SO Conde street. in building and
Improvement of which he has laid out large sums Of mo
ney In order to carry on said establishment IN man
nee % 'ne p pnnmc anu % 70 e M
n,t s'nn ~ s,ficiant fo,tha rants ~ s.;S
bsbmapf haa alvavs naia ths nFfra 6omandsd ID,
said whilst ON tbe coptrary Tia hss fo
long time past failed to comply with part Of the
tract to furnish water in sufficient quantities Th
the part Of the company It is averred has beer
from year to We from is4t up TO the pre-
sent Time the supply OF water decreasing
~ sad nd @
answsred said comnlants Nv s5nittns fhef
and making promises for the fntlre Petitioner aepe