Daily American telegraph. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1851-1852, 1852-08-30
[yrom the National 1ntslligsnesr Of August 81

We received yesterday, from a gentleman in
Maryland, the letter which we give below. 1t
/ was written nearly ten years ago, and was first
| published in the Danvle (Virginia) Reporter,
and thence transferred to the /" Maryland Colo
nization Journal, }" from which journal it is now
copied. Our correspondent is of opinion that
General Scotts views on the delicate question of
slavery have been misrepresented, and therefore
desires to see this letter, in which they are fully
and automatically set forth, inserted in the Intel
| ligencer
| The views expressed by the General appear to
| us TO eynce wise and Comprehensive statesman
ship, as well as a characteristic philanthropy,
and we therefore, with pleasure, give the letter a
| place in our columns:
WASHINGTON, February s, l843.
MY DEAR SIR: have been waiting for an
evenings leisure to answer your letter before me,
and, after an unreasonable delay, am at last
obliged to reply in the midst of official occupations
That ever have been named in connexion
with the Presidency of the United States has not,
| | can assure you, the son Of an ancient neighbor
and friend, been by any contrivance or desire
of mine and certainly shall never be in the
field for that high Office unless placed there BIZ
regular nomination. Not, then, being a candi-
date, and seeing no near prospect of being made
one, ought, perhaps, to decline troubling you
OF others with my humble opinions on great
principles of State rights and federal admins
tration but as | cannot plead ignorance of the
Partially of a few friends, in several parts of
the Union, who may by possibility, in certain
event, succeed in bringing me within the field
from which Wing candidate is to- be selected
| prefer to err on the side Of frankness and can
dor, rather than, by silence, to allow any stran-
| ger unwittingly to commit himself to my support
Your inquiries open the whole question Of do
nestle slavery, which has in different ferns, for
q number of years. agitated Congress and the
country.
Promising that yeu are the first person who has
Intercepted me on the subject, give you the
basis of what would be my reply in greater de-
tail, if time allowed and the contingency alluded
to above were less remote.
In boyhood, Mt William and Mary College, and
in common with most if not all, of my compan-
ions, became deeply impressed with the views
| given by Mr.. Jefferson, in his "Notes on Virgin
ia," and by Judge Tucker, in the Appendix to
| his edition Of Blackstone's Commentaries, in ia
vor Of n gradual emancipation of slaves That
Appendix / have not seen in thirty odd years,
and, in the same period have read scarcely any
thing on the subject; but my early impressions
are fresh and unchanged Hence, if had had
the honor of seat in the Virginia legislature in
the winter of 1922, when bill was brought
forward to carry out those views, should GER
tainly have given it my hearty support.
| suppose | scarcely need say that, in my
opinion, Congress has no color Of authority under
the constitution for touching the relation of mas
| ter and slave in State.
| / hold the opposite opinion in relation to the
District of Columbia Here, with the consent Of
the owners or on the payment of "jast compen-
sation," Congress may legislate at its discretion.
But my conviction is equally strong that, unless
it be step by step with the legislatures of Virginia
and Maryland, it would be dangerous to both
races in those States to touch the relation be-
tween master and slave in this District.
! / have from the first been of opinion that Con-
gress was bound by the constitution to receive,
to refer, and to report upon petitions relating to
domestic slavery, as in the case Of all petitions ;
but have not failed to see and to regret the I'M
'avoidable irritation which the former have pro-
duced in the Southern States, with the conse-
quent peril to the two colors, whereby the adop-
ton Of any plan of emancipation has everywhere
among US been greatly retarded.
! own myself, no slave; but never have at
tached blame to masters for not liberating their
slaves well knowing that liberation, without the
means Of sending them in comfort to some posi-
ton favorable to "the pursuit Of happiness"
would in most cases be highly injurious to all
around rs well as to the manumitted families
themselves, unless the operation were general,
and under the auspices Of prudent legislation
But am persuaded that it is high moral obi
cation Of masters and savehodng States to
employ all means, not incompatible with the
safety Of both colors to meliorate slavery to exter
mination.
1t is gratifying to know that general meliora-
ton has been great and is still progressing, not
withstanding the disturbing causes alluded to
above. The more direct process of emancipation
may, no doubt, be earlier commenced and quick
ened in some communities than in others. EACH
| do not question, has the right TO Judge for
itself, both as to time and means; and l consider
interference or aid from without, except on in
vitaton from authority within, to be rs hurtfu
| to the sure progress Of melioration as il may be
| fatal to the lives Of vast multtudes of all ages
sexes, and colors. The work Of liberation cannot
be forced without such horrid results. Christian
philanthropy is ever mild and considerate. Hence
all violence ought to he deprecated by the friends
of religion and humanity. Their persuasions
cannot fail at the right time to free the master
from the slave, and the slave from the master /;
perhaps before the latter shall have found out
and acknowledged that the relation between the
parties had long been mutually prejudicial to
their worldly interests.
There is, IN the order Of Providence, no sua with.
ont some compromising benefit The bleeding Atri-
can 'cas torn from has savage home By his ferocioHs
neghbors, sold in slarery and cast upon this cont
nent. Here IN the mild South, the race has gConder-
fully multiplied, compared isHh anything erer kaown
IN Jarbdrous hs. The descendants Of few
thousands have become many millions and all,
from the first, made acquainted with the arts Of
civilization, and, above all, brought under the
light Of the Gospel.
From the promise made TO Abraham, some two
thousand years elapsed before the advent of our
Saviour; and the Israelites, the chosen people of
God, were for wise purposes suffered to remain
| in bondage longer than Africans have been on
our shores. This race has already experienced
the resulting compensation alluded to and as
the white missionary has never been able to pen
citrate the dark regions of Africa or to establish
himself in its Interior it may be within the