Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1852-07-29

-Fyom tie Maxckesker Democrat
! The General Thea proceeded to sneak Of his
. father and mother as riding horseback over
thai "a We been mad. vsi,hin few YEAR. r..
| referred TO the Con.t;fution 81 the coun,rv md
+ in q ,iou. strain of THOUGHT reeovn;zrd the
, higher law. and chat mower above ali con.ti-
I,pfi,ns" HI. nos;,;on here ,v.. az ,,ne,,,;vo.
cal. Ina, The Rev NJ Foxs s,rmerlv clergy.
man sf ,h;s town. coul, h., accent IN !, q. smf.
fcien,Iv ..fana,;cal" m .,,;.fv ,ba mos, mira
.bol;,;on;.,s
s 49, -.
!. "TJc .penlcr ,outool y,,z. .ub;-rf Mt ,Zare-
ry III .o;J !, ,,Ie oreu,c., tro,Ic of Le
conxtruoud II ,,o, N yrsor7,dI, Wa,l;.rtos.
i A, 6r h;m,e115c .,crcS sou a 5,mo. Ir;se +.
bondage ,cithom feeling his heart rerolf at it
S/drery Is contrary TO tile Consfuutsoa IN some
'esPeets-a mora 0,o 1pcm &c cA1rn''o ~ nc
""f'o"' DA' I" car - oe metpe0. iAI '''ee"
10 me great peru IN WHEN 'he on'on Ia" Ds'"
p'dceu. Oo"e' anu a"iohs '"e"' ie"1' "
Caro'ina' openly avo"ed disnmo n; ana Jon"
iaie ndo 80 'ar lu" p :" me '"JI e".. -
~ .;a.A NJ lo"ss Wiz ~ A"e' a:'u 80
..p."s = VI "n H. ~ an - 20.
~ II' ~. ~, J.S,a ~
nsonl.. b. w.,,,d a. t. e ,,a Ir;nn w..,o
i,e J;s.nIvsJmanI .,;.s.,1v.; !, NM, ,r,b.. Com
,,s,,..,;sa -. III ~. -,
eth. ;o,,,;,v ,h. nal, .Do VIM, 49,
gard the G.a,ures of ,b,. Fugitive SIav,. Law
as con .isteni will, common law?"
Grn. Pieyce-"WELL IF | MUST ANSWER.
No. DO NOT. IHAvE BEEN ASKED n / LIKED
i"'s ruGir"E SLAVE Law ANSWERED. NO
cy,xo ,ir nr I ,.vr. INV Ern,r,v, S,.xr
Law rs orpos,n tn pry,x,rv fHr.r sour
ONE INQUIRED. is NOT OPPOSED TO n tGHry"l
YES. IT is OPPOSED T" MORAL RIGHT. But
or mr. '..hers made the compact and We must
UNI, .i. =" IaS no'hi"e o, me "uiia" y % ~
:,
run ''P''. ., same :" '''
'"u.Pen'e''' democrat o""cor'' ~
ia '"asyman Mn" was present sa'o '.a,
liz ~ ,,,L,, ON -, N ,,,,, ,o,or ,,,..
fugitive slave law as copsis,eu, with CON mn
law r.
General Pierce Immediately replied ~
mas' a"s~eF me preston say no. 40 no.
'"'e Ger" oS"e" . Anhe anS Jes"n S'"0'
NO., xoro,";~a e.,;m ~, -, H. a;r;no un or n
sIarc tze lo,c ;y amused 10 Lumnn;,u.''
Here Mr.. Foss inquired. "Ifn was not
| opposed to right. as we'll as humanity" Gen
moT~ r'gh''
IL mas been denied t'a' ueneral r'erce 'nsue
INC ms "e,e a',.'o''eo 10 ''." VI ~ '"'
a".s SP'eo" a' an at we" "os'o' !" :, hia' up
''''e' NO" nc observer "'a'' 'ne'e WV
'oPo''S 'PP'a'eu eo'e"P'ra"oousy :" '""
PaPers-one published IN Manchester "" ere
"e mao sPohth IN November looo' ana ine
o.he' a' oohcoru. MS ON" pace OF res'uehce
IT, as 'he "ePuphcah says 'he hrs' sPeec" Is
'he true speech winch Is prhessed 10 De re
ported !" these TWO papers, can 1t be pos 81
Die 'hat inc manchester paper would have
sta'eo 10 nave peen deiVercu al view do =
'oh' on the second ol January 1907 ~heh III
ldct IL was oehVereu at Manchester Inc Soth 'oi
NoVemher'looo AND Is IL al all probahie tina I
paper Pnoashed al Inc place oil Fierce o~i'
feS'dehce' Whatever may nave oeen It's CHAR
acter shonid have attributed to him remarks
which he did not make and The delivery OF
speech at place when he did not speak ! If
these New Hampshire papers lave he'd on
flerce' weshouid IKE TO see the co-cmPorane-
Gus denial oil ia DENIAL OF 1t now would come
too late. But we think the Manchester speech
furnishes very strong evidence OF the correct
ness oil the reports OF the New Boston speech
The one Is but the sequel OF the other He
who at Manchester hated and depfoFed adrery
as much as the abohuonists who wanted to dis
solve The Union, was prepared to regard 1t az
"a moral bfot upon the character Of the nation,
and to 'foaMe the tusi'ive slave law, aud have
'reeo'f'nS feehng at Meg'r'ng sPotd stare
at New Boston, Taking II for granted then,
that Pierce delivered both these speeches
we again ask every candid man TO compare
his views OF slavery with those Of General
Scott, and answer the question 10 his own
ieart-"hch Is most likely TO prove true TO
the rights OF the South and the obligations of
the Constitution under all circumstancesl-
We think there can be but one response. tits
true that, at Manchester, Pierce was advoca-
ting acquiescence in the Compromise, sud at
New Boston submission to the Fugitive q ave
law. But why! Not because he had such
| affection fnr the riuhfs oF The Sn1,h I,uf