The daily union., 1852-12-11
The Message upon Non-nteryention.


la hrs notice OF the message OF the President We
remarked thai the passages lis close ia relation TO
Intervention did not appear TO TO be called for by the
existing state of public feeling in the country BY the
position Of any considerable party in regard to that
topic We might have added this remark the state
meni of The fact that the Presidents rebuke was
rather directed at the avowed policy of certain
portion OF his own party than at any doctrine upon
the subject eoun,enanced by the democracy 1t is well
known that what was wild and impraecable n the dec
araions of Kossub in regard to measures OF neryen-
ton by the United Staes found its chief if not its only
support and encouragement in the columns OF such wbg
journals the New York Tribune and Times. The lat
of these journals will be remembered proposed the
unqualified adoption of those propositions Of Kossuth al
the bar banquet in New York, programme Of the
true policy Of this conntry in regard to European
nations. And these propositions which. as is well
known. this journal wholly disapproved and dis
countenanced, did undoubtedly involve active and
armed OF intervention by this government II
is not surprising. therefore, that the two leading ,0hg
journals TO which we have referred should now take
the lead in denouncng the Intervention doctrines oi
OF President Fillmore The Boston Courier quotes and
comments upon their language as follows:
"The Presidents non-inervenlion policy has excited the
WTatn OF the new paper, In It's
view of the recen. message Of Mr. Fillmore, saysi
"Mr. Fillmore has perfect right oppose the Kossulh
doctrine of intervention in behalf of nonnerventoD
he has right present ityet he does No one
has seriously contended that ought nation
bark in general crusade in behalf OF people struggling
against desposm What maintained by Kossuth ana
still is by many thou sands sihs that the laws
all nations pdrtisstha they have
hagrnny violating those laws Gas Nicholas violate
them in sending his armies crush independent Hungary
which had assaed nor harmed him) ought be
nv a fpe nu a he n,
ulteor If necessary Why does the Presiden
meet the actual case or let 1t alone
''The New York Tribune has perfect right to dissen
from the President with regard his foreign policy bu
II 'has right right to misrepresen him. yet 1t does.
The Tribune says no has siousiy contended thar
ought nation to embark in general crusade in beha
Of people struggling againt despotism' Then Kossutt
must been joking when, the bar banquet in New
York, he said
"But / may be answered, .Weu, ir we (the United
Sales) make such declaration OF admission Of the
interference of Russia in Hungary (because that is the
practical meaning of the word will deny) and Russis
will respect declaration, then might have
20 war And there is the rub. Well, am the
TO decline the consequences OF my principles. will
steal into your sympathy by slipping evasion Yes gentle
confess, should Russia respect such decara
OF your county, then you obliged, literally obliged
go war; else be prepared TO be before
| mankind from your dignity.
"The New York Times. in the face Of Kossuths decara
ton, also assaiIs the President 1t remarks that
sThe President devotes large potion Of the CLOSING
| part Of his message 10 the demolition of an imaginary
party, which is endeavoring to persuade governmen
interfere between contendng soveregns and their
iecis for the purpose Of oveTthrowing the monarches
Europe establishing their place republican ins,itu
tons He argues length and with great cogency ha
we ought involve ourselves in these wars OF Eu
rope = and nobody disputes the position, eve
commended for the conay doctrine presume the vie
tory iii remain with him