New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-01-22

on lne palI VI .a uiI ~, snv vlrtuods woman IS
itself Communication IeAs a., r,,t,og and speecn
subject 70 have made TO her Ia "iis.s 60 81 20
-, - - ,,snner only tnat Is the s1'JeC; ol e
aho ~ IL .io he matter goes farmer, an1 refef-
J. ance is made 10 declarations N"Iou 80, - - -
NO. IN hun then he > e.'hs' go s &, -,
1.1.sbood Bat you nave toiu me N~-u Vl "u-
Ialseb09 "a ,onr words create upQa my Sfa'eim
+ es-D mat you would not couos M. h4I nc
tad MIN so II she Dad no., ne Va 'ehe"is ~ ~,
- e.r,.t for her an Inspection, WithJut desire or
- rbst any Other human beng sHOIl ses u.s.
TsIerccd-a secret, confidential he 20 the only per
son that knew y to be a he. Ana NhN "o'i.
bs the inst4B! answer of a Flfinous woman II
such an Iuconcely1ble occurrence should tdAe
place such 4 maa must be crazy sac
would say" must be mad lie iofgess az y.
nlisrs PeseDilng me upon paper lie ls essOiipius
me a. making ayosals o. love. and rem ing He
Of the music upon MS grateful ear ~hen no slsa
thing occurred, ard ne means 70 cOmpio.ll'sS5 ny
beyond measuTe." " WITH these conSol 4Iiohs eesi-
est our aspiration, though painful. Slil not % IN
tndura1e' What vas the conso Axiom 70 "sl 80
Why, t1e reflection on their pas intercourse y" az
had been their past intercourse De'iaia IDls ~
love on ms mart srd the confidence OF love On -f'
would say more God knows NhAt ne collu ss5
more Ilauehlerl % throw aay ishi upon ms -
and why Mn FOmcy should "flte 20 say '1' - "i'I1>
or SOBER 10 get more said On inis suoyec1 'h"H0'
Wbsn you cone 70 speak Of admiration" aud
love THIS remark seems % me 10 reduce al
nlgation TO the level Of the lnea0est ctpt,isy
and however refined, Intellectual, and exalted H'ef-
ary people may be, the mode in Sncn tney .o'e
seems 20 me 10 be OHo very mlch reaeh lag -""
Of ordinary mortdls. Ciaspd tohsueiJ-
Ad,suf adieui when next mset,
NLIb0t al sacless then re-rt-i
A4f ylaic tae conquered -ne % D...s.
A1d sea. She uuu IA "l.h @ ass.
Wei. what did fhs sayl Suppressed 'las'.s'l
SIZE fas reminded 81 her CCciafttJus OF 4''c "a
i.rrs uart gv this man. she va begged 20 Ntne
Inn aia lell him that She Tas naopy. she vas ~
Otife0 Of whether, when she returned ant in6s mt
IN. their triumph was 90 be seAeA "t.h
blsr" Now Nhen Won c0me % ce eiara''9os oil love
and eyowais Of confidence, wnsa You come W
clas,iIg people ia yOlr Anus all seilA5 -ie
meeting DJ d klss, Jou come % mi % 80
~ mo1tals regard rs food for adultery. Now
urder clrcam.iances Of innocence Dut one tning
should have been done sac snoll nave IN
staluy hauCeC TINS c0mnunl atom u hl- J,ie'1
and sal1, " Sir, -1is man is cahy. iie q .haA..s
ayoWas OF love b. me, wrlfug OF hs alhift'. IA ,or
me and remind Nc me o. my confidence ia I'm. ne
is eyioeuily crazy. D. M take 4uY nOhse Oi II. l
begyOu MOI 20 30 So" WHAT vas hes course II is
10 mat which you attach importance, and lhe court
I must attach importance. she KEPT up me same OF
even greater intimacy gfer Sac received ihai 'e'5ei,
as beJoTe She sweaTs 70 TINS Ia her al1 tyl1 ana IL
does rot resi- upon any ter mOh} lltfoauce4 ~ US
ffiere Nh Van Buren, read from tle nuoslel -cs.4-
. IuCuy .
she had once xpres Cd sufficient c0asnre' Of she
Coz sueo letter. WHAT was TINS "sllicienl cen
. sure ' That Is lei. 20 the POKER oil inislAtlJl -
/ decide. We may not know Hnh Sae Ic5a!-el rs
. sufficient ceLsuIe.' suppose, since Ne nave 5t,
one fue to ulge Ol What Ne DO not knO =, ana NV
is by what we 10 know, We must here Apply inS
rule Perhaps she made the same reply 70 the iet'ef
as she did 10 Anna Flower way, sdld shej
Anna 1t j. shame, and when see MN a5llu
viii give hin a good ScOlln5.' lbtuSh.ti
That might have been, IN her lulSmch., SUI
lclert censure' Now, on the other hand, II
YOU believe the statements Of Mrs underwood as
10 the Inauptr ia which this letter vas discovered
aC her entire account bad AS tla account Is, IS ldi
short Of the truth IN thus case. td,re Nj taa
NOods affidavit, pp 20 ana III Now, gentlemen,
/ DO not know what M ght be TequTedin al ordinary
oso to prove an acs OF adultery ou. u seem, 20 ue
incredible, with these facts ADMITTED, II jameson
fails to appear-tne one Who could explain this
transacton-who IS shown to be lvmg-Or was
I offered 10 be shown 10 be- lNlng-~ho could cone
upon the stand and deny tbs adu.teT0us lnTrcOufse,
If IL n0t true Yet, Ia view OF these facts, IN
view OF these ayOwas OF love- Cherishing entertain
| Ing and croing them. Keeping up the same ih'l-
macy aiteINdTd. and WrltlnB All the WINE the WlsI
enthusiastic letters 10 her husband, II tue man VINO
could explain them fails 70 appear upon the stand
fails to present himself as witness, to deny or give
explanation, Al the case admits Of eXplandlJu nov
/ rs II possible, say, 10 avoid the inference wnich
these facts inevitably force upon the minds OF the
guilt Of the party But, gentlemen, We are nor leit
entirely 10 inference upon tglS slOJect, ana VIII
now call your attention 10 the testimony ilrmsled
by some letters written 10 Mrs Forrest by Mr.. For
rest, and her replies but before doing So, IL seems
TO NE proper TO READ YOU her explanations OF these
/ matters She says that Mr.. Forrest tired TO extOft
from her confession, for he, too has been engaged
plots for the first time ms llfe and late IN ne,
too. She gives TINS account OF ~ ana Is Import 4lt
al least IL her judgment. MI '. b. read % 20 53l
On the 24tn OF December last he sent lester by the
hands Of AnsTeW stevens Nov, alter the folio wing
preamble OF the plO, ~ take advantage Of her mex
peIiclce. She goes on - snoS It cl1 not amount to
uytang after all Therefore The pioif hled according
/ 10 her own account Now. gentlemen, lei MS fetu
/ this cOneslortetce. You Will remember that hel
theory Is that the charge of laAdcIty was arulily
concealed and MAS so dTaSn that she might overlook
that charge. tMr. y. u. read me coue>p prudence,
ID 46 To 40 Now, before | real nCr reply want
YOU 10 bear N mind that She S~eaIS that that letter
Was the first lntimaton she ever received ihat Mr.
Forrest suspected her lAr. '. read Mrs.. Forests
affidavit 10 that eiieCtl NOW that he charges her
with guilt FIVE times that II reminds her that TINS
guilt the cause OF her separation, that reminds
her that II vas 10 conceal her nom shame, H Is ne
Cessay TO repeat the statements OF TINS letter. NOV
ask YOU TO consider whether she states the tEuth
when she asserts that 1t Is the first time that she
knew OF the charge Of inicehty. II Il hal been So
what would she have done she would nave
tainted on the spot-0een utterly iowcrieSs AID
helpless from mere amazemsHt. wouldn't she
she would have gone 10 some acquaintance ana
poured out hcf sfieiS. She would have compliance L.
"lnhC cty guilt ls The cause of ms estrange meat,
AID TIE subject Ot his charge aid Il the first time
have htaro 20. and ne now IeQTOtChe> me Nth wan
a. silence Wouldn't she Inevitably h we done "a Al
before answering at ali ana wouldn't she nave SUB
United that answer 10 that SympithlGug acIuttW
vance Now Mat does she Answer has.en 20 LAY 4
ttoTey 0u. II IS by no means hasiy CON nllic alton
Mir Il Tcadpp 5Ut0 81 las All mission .arO1g a.
out Itis iaIlUro 20 deny lhose n1astroIs charges
an omission 10 repel them a eithCr neN or Jude
served butitlsaSimpe express on Of fegretthat ane
remaining silent iot months she should have ~ last
been compelled - speak. Nota soTO u denial, moi
an expression % surprise AZ the charges, ont merely
that tie tone oi the letter lds her dee Ply, ana
q ccurse having agreed 20 shield her from Same
she regretted tlat ne had consented 90 change hl
course but oaN shat Re changed as course Ia speak
irs OF ,he " tone II our letter
Well, / DOM know Nhat effect evidence u t1il
klno produces upon the Mmd " comes uD3a my
mlnc With tae most stunning effect ana u is inQ2s
sOle Tor ,ne 70 believe th4l tne charges We're lr,
mtmaiee 10 hog iu the manner sac sNears. Nov
amer I've CAPE ano Ca consultation ~llh friend
Sht teen saw ltS Importance Of cpntrlNIns story
which should 10 'utc these charges tNr. Van 3
toSd her 'et % De- e9l sne allied ms attention
totne tone oi his Ic;C. she says cannot tllna VIZ
you should now seem consider foolish au1 aROny
nous letter IS al evidence Of guilt Wen, # ila
MAS foolish letter. Il presents - me very curious
notion % What a ioo.sl lSUcr IS bat II p. a.
AlolN nous .eittT IA Tie sense lal ~ ana re
tenn. itls new JeLpi'lul Mr. torres "a ' HE
nsp Who had written T., although MS name no,
signed - u That IS a. i1geIloas explauati> N.rl