The Texas Republican. [volume] (Marshall, Tex.) 1849-1869, 1852-10-23

II 49,. k1,,k.1 in the
"he" ! VIZ ~, a, :, n.ue,',
ra'i'o' W '''' =, H., ,..+,
'n,NeP'',' -. .,,,,.h Aid
'H'"s"'N,l VI -. 49, .,.s;,y
hot 'n'"" ''"'' en-. I.d.,to,,
OF "H''"S aga" "a
the course "hich' '""H' w
winch AnPi''N'" "o """'"' '"0' '.''.'.'.'..
escape" Tue "'''e'", :" 49, fr.,,;nn,
~ the newspaper ~ nm.
WAS 10 procure q, wv "',''' ~
justice to zen i'e'c'' ~ gins "''
correct his u,J's' "",' A. L..
Judge hN"ns S!e''" "',
mus, hho" 'lht u" "e''''''''
that speech ~ l'AS' W we paw
IN my letter 'hinh ! "'l oe n",' W $40
very plainly an" w. !" W." ~
bN al 'hAi ne "us" '""''''S W nav
ifa'lfd Tue hilsft 'tse"''',''' ,,
he error III '''e "'''o' 40
Judge ttan' ann,'"e' ''l"' "1" ,'''' "''I
said he lohlht' uh' 'us'uN' s'"'o ''" '"
that he feVol'en Al 'l' giving Wy VI
before iakiug up Tue evidence ""'o" VI,
Patn"t u.eH furnishes against us ''F'"'|
viii say, That since t'' ias' ISSUE W ''''
paper, have conFefs"d win some ol NY
wing trends "h' were P'e'e"' ana ',''"',
ed well TO that speech, ana ,heN say ''' "o
mission Was not made bn' '"''e Is "
my mud, ~ the report hseii' 'eiutauoh
complete OF The fatflo' 8 statement anu III
the very paragraph containing the n'sre
presentation, We are '"ini tn ,ne report
that Cot WINS asked the 'uuee WHY n'
had dwelt 50 murh upon inc at'''hs n''"e
upon Tea. ~ zee Tor ms We" 'o''""
speech aud iurlher u he rom" Nolr 'of
Ten Piefr" y he hdd sHld all ne had o'tn
charged with saving on That occasion
The Judge, according I" the Patriot, hao
admitted the truth OF the charge against
ten Pierce II this vera 80, would Col
Mills have asked the question stated II
seems To me, that under the circumstances
the question would have been very dill
ierent one. llcfc then, think the report
plaioly contradIcts ITSELF
Bat. IN his remarks upon my letter ~
the last Patriot. the editor both b'gs aud
jgaJs he question. How much aircr II
Wnnd have been IN him to have arhuoVl.
edged the error, and made " the necessary
correction. Tie does not defend his r'
port, but seeks 10 esadr, both that aud my
letter, BY asking, 1T did not hear the
conversation between the orators OF the
day, ma, 4 not b" Inferred that there were
other things that escaped NY hearing De
admission. II made al 'ii' was "'hue curing
Tue judge speech al" NOT u u" c"''''
salon between The speakers, ana h'nc'' u'e
above ,h't' at escape does not sustain 'h'
report hu' Is d"'fhf circumstance against
IT. Now am "ll'As To aunt 'l"' 'hoeh
mat WIS uhiihpor'ant III 'he sp'eehes' may
nave escaped my ""'l'"' pu' VIII tel '"t
editor That an admission so interesting dna
i"p'r'd" 10 u" No"h could not VIII tell
him more, mat u he WI show me fespec
table proof 81 ten Fierce : ever having
uttered sald language, or, Il he VIII prove
by the MAJORITY al those wa" h"afh JUG"
IN question, VII not support Gen flrrcr.
80 iar from not wishing to near snch an
admlssloh, II be true mat 'en. iiefce
sa'd what Is charged "ould IKE l" "noW
IT, but lei " proceed lie says AS
had, Ike ten. Pierce met ms report by a
general negative, 'hough thought IL ifoi't
a'fec' ana poaH'vr'j y" W,"''n l" h"p" o.
me what 'ueH' Evans o'' 'e'u A"u 'uh'',
&C ana 'heh pfoceeu' 10 give ~ 1t ""uid
SEEM what stated N'w' Tue language
gwen IA the last fatr'o' as that Tfad 10y
Judge evans ana coming "'"' me- Is, !
think, me language OF w. speech USED Nv