New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-06

The ara which s.st &c ny trothsr conts asa whs,
u supposed sne ds SUI suppose to - a ssd igs'
position o. the whole Of the cass rrs-lc leer
II reply, rm bothsr in wheA hs stated thai &c ksa
shown teaf cad 10 JoG that yoa 40 "a Ia tse q vat
ousy amended and attend ,aTsgaId T. - oyssoa uat
you 7ugh, 70 s-sree Il uasainty ur N 4, MT
bro'hsr the ~t ol % s'y tn be ais y5a- SIR Par
D.. the w1r1ine OF This does " rl-as. =,
a II you viii give M drs~ on torn .,a
produce that VIA give ssi'cas 70 esth siie, Tie
went on 10 say tte; he this brn whish n
uss willing d adopt lac sasge wss %
oopg viii ny hand wiring send - ia OF NJ
Ian H.n' who would see to rs nsezioaln The Era,
was Of ths opin.Ou At the ts shs' tie "er-S which
had more and fair eNp~se OF the subject
s1oi .houe have much p,e'erTea i,s pao.eae9a Ont
ihOught II wilirg 70 corseat - sns 30 as
meaS ought e ce w1lins as0, sna uloa
the eonclnsion that was the Best eNpsss'o@ "Sa
In il Jea were represented s,tnE viii ts eaaItssy ani
dEuty VII CD becomes Chrisisn m Al OF hon ssd AK
pressed what svesfely se'a pleasure IN re'anns saJ
uni.tsrtiouAl iniustr. which uisht have coue you
Nothing could hsve heen nor sI'p- 'ns tnsn sne pe
Of your You ~ perceive Il once thai the se ss
between yoa snd nv brother Henry who l1dGlns 20
trne OF his letter 10 me, cOnHdersc hus-i % oe &C ~
al kiLdneSs sirn and sOod alta as heaicass 90 90
thnl Le wl be equally surprised with lY,e 2 saa Iaa'
yu 90 . consider &c urse hAys 20 letters
by ie.r ST here fsw things Ia this ms',sr
that y know perfect well ur hnc thst loo y ss
rst pscs thst The remark published published IA
ps unkinduess whs-vsrtnst Z oabl md as
Sc TO 10 replied 10 l. o. an .Lie arg sot cor
hoGy sLO u Il Tat the charauer Of the Sgtice
And your slpy a q name " leafos
who vas known 70 haze PAD e,y sdvAcd hat sear
Tert lad a po' sibe ns4ui VI Aicwns nN re Ssns'
yours sud tie very srJngest evidence -
believing th.t il stree had ain sd 10 n'pee %
ttst have lar uch. wh-n Pscs SIDE ~
ride With what quoted such nat not not ooe nAa IN tee
can - sos see ciasIen;s SHoie taw oaSAas
haze ed .y aae sincerely 70 eNPlta 10 ssnaee
uea Ast 7sl mssa byte 1nsu1ss ~Aen J D. aa l
the except this that {. 10 Jssucal coa,rneoi OF
lgnguase b hcl either two o3pos 10 ass'a0s csn ~
elmsd g. the Writer'S s-nti' srts according to emsFsen'
sra publish the facts Of toe Just a, wrote
then-kysf, what did say seoorf what ysu ga
,sl th'd, tie evidence that you kHe~ the eon'Easuoa
which the world ws put,tse upon ar language Asd et
that cid contradict IL But certainly tck that
The Whole stier Is In more eredaos fern to you nov
have done what CONSIDER to be peri. y hou,rsSs aud
r to remove ga impusron for which you have given too
/ much cccssiou.
! Yoa Know perfectly well VI Parker. fos tod you
frankly inai did no consider myself g have acted wsns
in this matter but simply TO have alea into mistake,
which our silence rendered unavoidable aud CONSIDER
myself to have said all that you can possibly expect from
une@r the circumstances When my brother returns
which vii be soon yna wi eogsos discs rs ia' ~ ~ f
proceeding Yours very truly ups,
And now Il II aos 10 be G. ncesed tha. Or Psrxee AMI
I I stand before the public at UPON question OF
personal veracy. AHd those who Dc not tal upon she
convenient theory Of mutual Elsl HG0stdqdlqS nust
determine the hIue oy the personal On Tscier oil NE
parties. But sc cd Jus recess.ly &c th s9m4wnN
sllev.aed by eyeral consider idoas to which call 81
tsuhoD.
letters iadr adUi'smeGi, aad encouraged The expsc
tai N that with some mod ai0H, mlgnt tile Oh
by Sck rsts0d, (see letter OF Jule 81 u
| J. Oj,Srs', re- has fatally ennapped him Ill For
hsye II In ny p0usr 10 shaw that such slate nens
were morally impos'i6le.
A hAln Of events bs.inung with Dr. Parkers c'uu'
scl, and NOT 9th as, had ed q several pr 40 lnier
Jews; had satisfied Mrs stowe OF her error had SET
tied her determination 20 make public repsrauon sno
ard Dr. Parker could net agreo 40 10 the jyTn. sac
weDtIo New HAye t. resi- aud there ,my 10 review
The whole ground aud settle VII herself whe' stfs
/ Sho tha atat anna q.
cafed IL 10 be uldmBiun gave ms hu9riy 70 chtngs
the phrsseolosy but she spi OF the thng aod Dc
cares: / am well pleased with It'll 70 AL " d'-u
be Sol have tbie vii publish Il and he may 90 waaI
be Hkes" Mos let II b. consldersd whether this 10
The language (or tust OF the letter which wrote a1et'
ward VI persons VINO feared suit v no Tsse neSoh'
aps n avoid one, or whether 7;goHsHon 81 an sort
was nv erraud 10 Dr. Parser
Twas sent To re him a card that was TO be published
whether ne liked II rot sod whch "a' 60 es cAslSsi
only as 20 phraieolcsy. / not sent 10 ak oil n
/ Wheeler he would take such and such apology In
/ leu q $4,000 dsmBges Instead wss TO cay inls
70 b he substantially published at any rate but We ~sn
Cur own sense Of what II Il ight for us do AZ my
suggestion spd biz urgen, request a substitute was
wr,ittn in eps Dlary form. NV Dr. Parker does not
tay thai be asked lme 10 consider "nlcn OF the 10
paplTE he he'd rsber have published (nay ne hai "la'
held IN any letter that there card ~ al ana %
has once entened 10 either of four letters tnst
/ the leIlers wItien In ole own study ddrias
friendly coBferenoe besw9en u.s. 6d' M says tan ue
Or mis- rake these letters NH6,r odrtsfent rus
his with inverscty FOR dill
not come 10 AJAX for settlement | came to make
card which be published at any rae, az sgrae
able 70 bim could be- cons'ieuty with ia substantial
averInerU Had be Their fore made the remark which
be says. or any remark Of the stnt, my answer
must have beer. " DR.. Parker, | did lot ask you
wheeler you you'd con'en. 20 have these pu9i'hed-
bus simply whether you had rather should publish
Mrs Stoves apology In the shape OF this card, or In
the shape Of this correspondence
- Aside from tho lat'ins'c eyidepce, thers happens
70 be esUin SIC circun'tance bearing upon h was
a.. t. frNf. III. n1ah had a nm
nitiec by Mrf Stowe the mai dsposIlon o tots afsir
Nbs,sv did must DO dOns ~ opce. hNto Dc sup.
posed that should have been put OF to an uuap oted
sbo Indefinite settlement and not notice Iha factt Coud
fsil Tsply to Dr. Parker that such Thing sas I'm
possible that mad no tins for further coof1r-ncsl
Tte pub ic wl require a word Of eSplanston {" 10
nv reason FIR going Ihence 10 Mr Batter. Wnen Mr..
Builder applied take thls case, sod had seen inc
documentary evidence such vas BIZ conide ice 10 Mrs
Stoves ptegrly ana Chrs'n honor and susn was aus
conviction tina, there was evidence thar sne IA, sre
presented DR. p that he was confident thar priysse
settlement might be had II Ira stowe could out DO
riahJy approached bad M erstood at my iotsrSie"
with Mr. Barney thst when Dr. Parker applied Tor coun'
eel Sir Batter made II ndiiOn OF nis undertaking
The case that DR. Parker should take Ia ths mat
ter vhbout nr.t cop,uitiog him. may nave Deco
snshty inaccurate as 90 his ont; but ~h-thsr ~" or
noy that pas my understanding When De Parker SAID
thar he was satisfied with the correspondence provided
bis counsel sssented. ssw tho reason snd lnstony
AID, " Then viii 20 immediately - hr buusd. ~
was not 10 obtain any suihors u n nm Paon'has
the letters nor OBTAIN hts sgresmeni that be would
not bt suit bat 20 make DR. Psrkers approx OF ce
letters eeciua bv obtaining bis counselr consent iof
him 10 act thus 10 the settlement Of the matter, II no
Wisted 49, -,
3 B.ttherels another suggestion which vii satlsiy
a business man that DR. Parkers story 70 nsrn'cslif
absurd,
His statement 10 that be bad obtained counsel TO brng
sol, for go eco damsges that "FoRCED letters as
set,iemeul Of that sun and published lhsn In the daily
papers without his kpowedgs or eonsent! And all
this was doLe also without obtsioing written fen-
osf nnen Of clsn for damages should be yet enoose
to being sui DID mortal man ever before dresm o.
uubnsbed forgery a. a pscifcstion Of angry lid
CANT or OF forger publish ng MS &C. that tue az
! grieved parties would iufariby find IL outtb next
morning end doing In way TOO, that iett tue door
ofesdeo ard NOS only eft t open 20 hin, but heaped
by sucb provocsdon fresh fuel upon biz zeal as prose
crtor Had done such crazy deed ougat 90, 70