The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1852-04-07

u
takes issue with more than OglAs OF the wing parry u
the North on that question,
Mr. Hilyers resolution simply aihrms the a"a"s q
the Compromise Had that resolution depended on Tue
vote OF the northern .sgs sioa ID would have been ootsS
aovn 27 10 lothat u.s. by majority OF almost mrss 70
one, Sueh il the support which the policy OF President
Elmors nm the sectional receives from the Dhg
party o. The North!
Had Mr. HiIyers resolution depended on the vote oil
the northern democrats aoas il would have been sustained
by majority Of 80 10 20 that u.s. by almost ,oo TO
These facts give distinct and final answer to the
question: Which of the two great parties OF the North de-
serves the support and cooperation of southern men,
who mindful OF the constitutional rights and the most
important interests of their sectioni
We deem unnecessary, in regard TO the votes given
by both parties at the South upon the two resolutions to
do more than refer readers to the figures as they
stand aboveit being, conceive, al this time, fully
understood that party at the South proposes to disturb
the Compromise, the slavery agitation in Con-
gress long the compromise shall be faith
fully maintained and executed at the North
One other very important fact is shown by the votes
upon the two resolutions II will be that they were
both supported unanimously by The southern iohg pois, with
the single exception OF southern whig Mr. Cngman
OF North Carolina) who voted against them BOTH Thus
sustained by the unanimous ,og voce OF the South, MI
Jacksons resolution was dswn BY The h party The
House That party North and South, gave 81 votes in
favor OF the resolution, aud 81 votes against il. Mr.
HlIyer's resolution, in the hands OF the wing party,
lust escaped the same fac-rsccving 80 wing votes
in its favor, and 90 against it, Thus il appears that
all the wings Of the South, added 10 all the northern
wings who oppose the renewal Of the -savery aga
lion, by means majority OF the whg party IA
Congress. The antslavery agitation wings can at any
time vote them down the question OF renewing such
agitation in Congress This most significant and i'm
portan fact will appear still clearly if we con-
slider the number of northern wings who were ab.
did not pOts Suppose these absentees to have
voted and distributed their for and against the res
outons in the ratio Of the northern wing votes which are
recorded, and it is plain that the wings OF the House,
against the unanimous of the southern wings would
have defeated both the resolutions Much more will this
be the case if the mort ani-savery wings shall be
enabled force upon the country their preferred candi
date for the presidency aud shall thus up to the
next Congress strengthened by the elections OF sue
cessul presidential canvass and by the defnve over
throw Of the fnaly policy Of Mr. Fillmore To rescue
the South from this most perilous condition Of things in
the ranks of the wing party of the country now led
and organized il has become fully evidenced that there
is no other reliance than the Of the democratic
party planted on the faithful maintenance Of the Com
promise as final adjustment. That ground the democ
racy has taken in its State organizations, both at the
North and the South, and has eafmed its position
by it's congressional votes sustaining both the Compromise
resolutions BY a majority Of about That posi-
lion assuredly il will neither change abandon, either
in its national organization in its coming presidential
canvass. Upon its in that position now plainly
depends the safety of the South and the tranquility Of the
country
Suboinei is classified list OF the OF members
whose vo,es are recorded the above resolutions We
have not yet found time TO prepare similar list OF
those who were absent failed TO record their votes
This we purpose TO do. however, soon possible,
with view TO place fairly before readers the whole
record in the
Vote e question q ssaiss Mr. mays,. rson as a" a'e'd
sourprss Messrs Thos H. Bayy Beas eekin
s Chou aaa.sa HOWARD aessoa Johnson
Jones m,,es sm MsIp sno Stanton ons 81
s sssis, 6 s'1 w rsa%p.sa, .s .s 60
g ps1i., Dawson, Dunham, Fiekn Fitch roisnce, r. b
k kSs s :s %ss. s
ss .s sGsS. aSe9G'
hss n sss%
sI,ay s9,ssI WALSH Ward, watkins
M Fuller, Haws, Haven
w. Parker, and Shcermebom--R
sournsns prxocr,r-Mesrs Aiken, Ashe, Avsreti, o. J.
W. johnson, Mcqueen, Meade, Mn-on Orr Powell, Vensoe
Wallace woodw ard-I9.
pKxocpATsMessrs Babcock, Bartlett Buell. Cable
r. Campbell Doy Dukee EdEcion, Floyd, Gaylord,
Johnson, d. T. Jones, Preston King
Moony ods Rsntou Russell, Smart, r. Stevens, susion, and
sweetser-23.
NosTurnr waos.-Messrs. Allison, Bancre, Brenton L. d.
Csmpbc Conger, Fowler Goodenow Goodrich Harper
emon r.nmiman Perkins sscse snoocrsn seadder
Stanton Thompson, Tuck, Wabndge, Washoun, Wells and
Yaes-1.
Vote on Mr.. resoiuaion
.ruRssuvr.
sorrHras opArs.-Messrs. Bayiy, Bocock,
A. O. Brown Caske, Cobb, Daniel Edmund
son Fresman, w. r. Hail. Hamilton, Hammond Hiycr Hous
McMuln, Meade Nabcrs Penn Phelps Polk, Rid
de savage scuuy Smith, r. r. Stanton, X ~ Stanton siose
m. csoss w Alien Ba.sy ci.rs Curtis.
a. Davis Dawson Dunham Fckin, Fitch, Florence, r. J. d.
FULLER Gamble, Ha, Hendricks Hem, bbsrd Ingcr
soil, Kurts, Lockhsrt q Marshall Mccche Mcdonald Muir
ssymoar seymour A. r. Stevens, Stuart and Sutherland
sourmssr wHes.Mcs~rs Bowie, Cabell, Dochey, Ewing,
Faulkner Gently Cray Landry H. Marshall Miller Moore More
Outlaw, Walsh, Ward Watkins, Addison White,
neI White nad Wlliams-20
w. Appleton Brooks na~s, Haven,
Martin, Parker and scbermerborn-7.
sourpsps prsooR.rs-Messrs Aiken, hshc Aveeu, D. y.
Bailey, Holiday, Mson, Powell, Wallace, and
wosdwMd-i1.
Nosrnrss prxoon.rs-Me-srs Bartlett Buell., Cable, IT.
Campbell, Dean, Doy Durkee, Edgcrton Floyd, Gay
Grow, Ives, Jenkps, j. Johnson r. King Moo
nv, hantoul, Smart, strntton, and Sweetser-92
HouTWsRs wura-Mr Clngman-i.