New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-01-30

Nd
IN the upper part ofthe same house. with Mr. Ehlers
that on 10th April, In the forenoon. she carried
letter into the store, directed as above, ana gave 10
10 Mr. Welsch 10 put stamp on II, and he did so,
and put In the box-aDd she carried another sini-
larry directed. in the afternoon, which vas stamped
and pun into the box BY w. and that on the 4h she
took IN another letter which was also put IN the bon
oy Mr. w. Mr. NcNalla was present, o'f took no
part. The letters never reached, she mas ressoa TO
believe, their destination. Complainant cs;ne here
irom Geneva, ONO, year ago.
M. faIland testified - have never received the
leiers so said 20 have been directed tn him.
william + Saar testified 10 being clers, al lae
ttofe OF Welsch & McNala. lie saw Miss IL Drag
IN Two letters on SUNDAY, The one IN the forenoon
ahc the other IN the afternoon, which were placed
IN the oex The letter.ca Old no: cali that "
he saw, SUBSEQUENTLY. Welscn take down the Post
Oce oox, carry Il into the back ROOM take ont the
letters, open, and read them. McNAIla being In the
room win him. reading the letters. They had the
coeT between the back room and the store shut, but
1t was glass door, through which witness couiS
see-saw Welscn take piece OF iron into the room
and break open the box. When they came out. wit
ness asked Welsch If he going 20 put The letters
back he replied TO- :hat ne would carry them 10 the
person TO whom they were addressed himself
hcNala vas present during the whole time OF
breaking open the box and opening the letters When
the ietiercarrier came Welsch told him there were
no letters IN the box w. offered me- (~i;aess) IN
June OF July IS II would 90 into the country and
not testify against him. After leaving their store,
went away and on returning, boarded al Mr. Ehlets
where Miss II did Do not knON whether Mr.. Far
land is a married man or not.
On motion OF Mr.. RicgHsy, Nc Malta vas com
mtted on the charge OF advising and assisting his
principal, Welscb. The punishment IS the same 10
either case being where there Is no money or article
of value IN the letter ne not exceeding $500, and
imprisonment not exceeding II months
Court OF COMMON PLEAs-Before Judge
Ingraham.-G George LorsH- agt. John Leonqrd.-ro
recover damages for assault and battery. painuh
having been Kicked severely SO IS 10 cause serious
injury. Plaintiff Was foreuau IN the work shop Ct
Nr shor,low, No. lis Fplton So. On 2Oth Mucb,
1851, he was returning through a passage Of The
Gsa2s f' s64 qI w S W SSsssssa
lie establishment, havir an al,sfcatl1n, ana u
Hcharged that without cause ttey turned upon nm,
and he almost Immediately atter~a'd refciVed ne
kick alluded 20, but ne dc L0s Ano" WHICH ol 'us
Inflicted Il.
The Court held that if three ndlvituais are seen
70 strike another and that nom one ~ men, a.
though the particular one l. unknown, ne receives
injury, either OF them Is liable to respond for the
injury. u IS also no excuse that the parIes nave
been drinkmg-ihst bat aesravates II. The jury
found verdict IN favor Of plaintiff FOR SOW oelhg
fun amount claimed.
SUPREME CoURr OF THE UNITED STATES.
Washington, Tuesday, Jan q, 1859 No. 96 an
ue DInsman plaintiff in error -. Chhles "ii.es.
This cause was argued by MeSsrs Addison and May
for the plaintiff in error and b. Mr.. Bradley for the
defeudan. I'm error No. %. Lessee OF John Mem
nedy's executors. A. r Beebe 81 al. ms cause
Was submitted to the consideration OF the touft on
tie record and printed argument ~ MI CAMPBELL
for the plaintiff IN error.
Court OF APPEALS ALBANY, Jan. rs
le52-No. 60 Warner and others, respondents, ag.'
Lee, President, &c, appellant. The eefault taken
in this cause on the 10Th inst opened by consent,
and cause argued James Edwards Tor appellant
y Hill Jr for respond Chapman, respoHdenl'
act White Receiver, &c, appellant. This cause
put upon the Calendar, and submitted. John IL
REYNOLDS for appellant Isaac iwards for respond
emf Hcne, Sc, appellant, agt. Kent executor,
the Calendar aud submitted by consent. \ HOW
ard. Jr counsel. No. 80. reserved case. Bulks-
lev, respondent agt Keeltas and others, appellants
Argued Samuel Beardsey for appellants "a "ald
Afternoon Session-The argument of cause No 9J
concluded al adjournment.