New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-07-17

entirely within the settled definition of forgery The
fraudulent making Of any writing prejuacia 10 snoh
ers rights, (Backst neD and the making OF false in
strument with intent to deceive Buler Justice) and a
false signature with intent to deceive Baron Eyre) and
the false making Of an instrument with intent defraud
(Gross Justice and the false making Of any ntrument
for the purpose of fraud and deceit (Mr East the
false making of writing with intent to defraud another
(ChitiyD forgeries at common law; and II TO
guard against all cayi on the subject the Legislature Of
ttk State provides that any person, who with intent
to Djure deraud, shall falsely make any instrument
in writing purportipg to be the act of another, by
which any person may be injured or affected 10 hk
rights property, shall be adudged guilty of forgse,
1t is sufficiently apparent for all purposes of my duty
that these letters made where they purport to
have BEEN and that they are the subjects of forgery
The prisoner must answer to the charge OF forging
them.
MARINE CoURT-Before Judge Lynch
Leach agt. BtidiHg-To recover the value Of a
steer, already referred to. Verdict for the deten-
dant.
Thomas $. Oiire agt. Henry BiShop-TO re-
cover value Ofsome sugar and flour, levied upon by
Constable Bishop on executions against Hamilton
Waddell, at grocery and bakery in Sixteenth-st.,
near Avenue A., and claimed by plaintiff, as having
DOugnL out tine STOCK ana gOOQ Will OF W duutu
Judgment for plaintiff sos.
Edirard Gridiey agt. William Rowload-To
recover $2I6 on contract and extra for carpenters
work on house No. ~ Twenty -secOnd-st., which
was built by defendant for MIR. Weeks. The de-
Defense principally, was that the work should
have been finished by the lst of February, 1852,
whereas, it was not so till May and defendant
Was damaged thereby. There were other points,
among them that the extra work WAS included in
the contract. Judgment for plaintiff, sos 10.
WnrtiR LGughrGH assignee OF Nm. WcG0uLd-
rick ogt. Peter and Patrick Oiirer-lt is alleged
tina, Messrs. l.. and 1lcG. (droyers) sold to deien
dau's at Bulls Head, five steers, for S3l0 that
orc half the amount was paid 20 plaintiff Me-
GouidIich md he assigned the other halt 90 plain
I'll. II is charged that defendants, who are butch
err. were partners, and that the cattle were
dIiytu to thciT daughter house. The partnership
was denied the cattle, il is said, having been pur
chased by Patrick alone and that he compromised
with McGOudIick. by-giviDg hun SlJ3 IN fall. The
points were denied. Judgment for plsIntif, slJj.
Before Judge COwles
MichGel Dy0H agt. AieraRder FT0ser-Fo re-
cover for services as a bOOk-keeper. Defendant
had a claim against a large mercantile house,
against which he had commenced en- action and
plaintiff was especially employed to examine the
books OF account of SAID mercantile house. lie
attended from day to day for some weeks, but did
not always have the books. 1t was shown that
the value of bOok-keeper's services was % 20 -
per day. In Defense it was said that plaintiff was
employed but fourteen days, and was paid for 1t,
The Court considered he was entitled to be PAID
for three weeks more, Mt So per day. Judgment
for plaintiff, S6j
MARINE CoURT-Before Judge Lynch.
JOHN Sttoart agt. Charles StGnLyTo recover dam.
agee, 10y one of the crew OF the snip L)chsbar, OF
blaine against the mate for assault and battery AZ sea
It lie charged that oD the 7th of February, while the
ship was going up the Gulf of Venice the mate called
the him and struck bin severe bio Ia tae face
Plsnuf then complain to the captain, bat it was
,aid got satisfaction and rs he resdrnng the
again attacked him, Knocked him down, and KICK
ed him in the side, that the man was compelled to
go 10 the hospital the arrival Of the vessel at Trieste
Judgment for plaintiff, $50 and costs.
John SOrer agt g. DOReue-To recover for years
service seged be due foreman or supervisor OF the
hotel of Mr. ID No ga Broadway 1t Yves snoSn that Ine
services in such office worth So m )n,h and
board 10 defense the claim was deni-t. II was said
he was employed as bOokkeeper at Sl2l2 GER month
and board but BOT giving salisacd to MI d. IN taat
be engaged, after two months, as bar keeper at =
per month, that their were balanced and
500 due % plaintiff, which teBGerod To hlm, out he
refuse to accept it. After the taking of,esmony plain
t Withdrew he suit in order, II was said, to obtain
further proof
John Dlryen and Thomas miller act. The HUDSON R'rT
Railroad COmpGHy-TO recover damage i~T Injury to
horse and cart of plaintiffs driven by person their
employ ment and struck by a Ice motive aud train oil
while crossing on lh April last The LeVen'h aV
at 1biTtyunth b. Inc cart WAS knJ kfi u peCcs di
the horse and driver injured IL was charged hat the
locomotive running az an unusual rate OF speed
that the conductor gave notice OF his approach, AMI
that the collision cEused by careesness On toe part
Of the conductor TINS denied the accident IL ne
ipr averred having been caused by the negligence OF
the person driving the hor5e aud cart tina. the rarod
was lot bound 10 tny particular rate Of srss;d above
Thityfrsts', but only bound 10 give notice OF their
approach, which they did, the whistle having been
blown az Fifty f0uuh-St and also al FOrytairdst and
that the diver Of the heard the last aud the
II aawHaa IA tran ar n IN
doing so wss unavo.da5ly struck 1t aAo said that
the locomotive MT going nj more than the usual
speed and il vas commended, Lhatlt there was tut o.
want # care on the part Of the driver Of the cr tn
Plaintiffs could not recOger The Court helt this 10 b
therue The Jury could notegree and we're nschsrge1
Count OF COMMON PLEAs-Speclat
Ternl-Before Judge Woodruff -PdtricF ran
HiHg against Rose Pennington motion OF NJ.
Van lIosenburgh, plaintiffs attorney, aud upon
fling the report Of the referee and the testimony
taken in the cause, judgment was given Tor PLAN.
tiff against defendant for divorce from bed ana
board forever and the sole custody of the two
surviving children Of the parties was given to
plaintiff.
COMMON PLEAs-Speciat Ierm-Betore
Judee Northumberland FduRiRg agt. Roe Tanning
on motion of Martin Van Hovenberg Plaintifs Ator'
ney and upon filing the report OF the Referee and the
testimony taken in the cause, judement was given r
pautf Of divorce from bed and board from defendant
ior EVER and the sole custody OF the two surviving
children Of the parties was decreed to plaintiff
BROOKLYN ITEMS.