New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-06-22


MIR CABELL-I ask the gentleman TO proceed with
the ding and give explanations the latter clause
of the dispatch The statement Is TO the effect that ~
the admission of the New York Contestants fraud was
pracce< by this Convention, and that II Scots chouid
not be nominated the Delegation OF that state would re-
pCdiale the act OF the Convention.
MIR RkYMoND-You shall have II. In the first place 1t
Is entirely untrue aud Ia bold that the gentleman
from Florida should not have made the charge, that
FRAUD was charged ON this Convention Cries OF or
derl
Mr. CABLL-I cannot submit to language Of this kind
Sensation. Cries Of Order" Applause, &C. SIR Is
that language OF this kidd Is &c be INDUCED Ia
here elsewhere. Ire Chair may enforce the rules
but claim protection from this Convention; am
able TO- and sksn protect myself said understood
s the reading and hearing the stter stated that the
word fraud was used IL the last clause, or bad faith
MT RAYMoND-Ah!
MI CABELiI AK the gentleman 10 read IT,
MIR RAYMoND--There u another paper over there |
prefer 70 retain this. Cnes OF Good" Go on, and
"order.'l
TIC PRKsiprNr said he had heard no &c mark reaect
mg upon Mr. CABEIL personally.
Mr.. CANAL not 10 30 charged by implicaion
q making lslse statement did not any paper,
spoke irVm 10y recollection OF IL Character. under
| stood the gentleman u charge q fraud but he nov
! cbsrges breach Of faith WHAT'S tie ci0ereneet
Mr.. RAYMOND repeated what he had already said
that the gentleman should not Interfere in this
without beuer understanding OF the language watch
| the remark implied, and he (Mr. RAYMOND did not
the word frsud although the gentleman charged
and when the gentleman says than he will not submit
|
charges with what Is untrue he will submit to what
! ever may think IL necessary 10 ssy.
Mr. CABELL-I sdmit most cheerfay the right Of eve.
~ gentleman, when he is charged with u,ering false
hoed TO submit defend himself | have stated as
Understood the paper and asked the gentleman whether
Mwss So and was on that presumption that the ex.
| plsnaiion was made
Mr.. RAYMOND accept entirely satisfactory the
explanation as 10 the In which the gentleman
| understood the remarks, u win be noted tar me
words "breech Of tdth," were with reference IN shs
Platform. As 10 the protest Of the NewYork Del-vs
tiap that IL matter which In the rs. plse
nv own correctness in this inland Ia Inc pex,
place the New York Delegation alone In relation 10 ths
rst do not think il necessary 10 trouble the Conveu
ton with any attempted demonstration 70 whether
was correct or net IN the remark
Alter further proceedings, the resolution proposing tc
expel Mr. RAYMOND was laid on the table
The Convention proceeded 10 the fortyseventh vote
during which several gentlemen addressed the body ex
pressing their views 70 the relative candidates TheJ
Loudly spplauded and many bouquets were throws
| down 20 the speakers from the galleries.
There being choice, the Convention proceeded ID
1 the toriyeighih trial
The change In the vote Of Missouri 10 three for Scorr
called forth applause did also the loss Of vote
for FILLMORE, by division In hestucky.