The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-04-09
ANnira In Albany.

GOV. HUNT AND THR CANAL LAw--rHE MANDAMHs
cAsr-THn COMMISSIONERS OF EMIGRATIoN-BAn-
ROAD ToLLs--THf WING CAUCUS, BTO
REspoSprecR HERALD.
ALBANY, April 8, 1852.
Governor Hum, hns sent message to tho Legislature
asking for law appoint special oounse appoar before
the Court Of Appeals to argue tho Mandamns In
support Of the conetltutlonaiity II tho Canal law The
commune alton referred In both houses the Com
mittec the Judiciary Law for tho purpose will no
doubt be introduced Tomorrow. This shows that his
Exccllcncy entcrtans fears that ths Law will be pro-
pounced unconstitutional. What stupendous avs
anche appears ready to tumble the State
resolution olored In the Assembly to ad-
journ wednesday but waslad the table That Is
the last Of the hundred days and member
PEELED to remain hour longer
The argument on the Auditor Mandamus will oom-
menco in the Court OF Appeals on Monday a. indicated
by Judge Gardiner to-day
ssners Of Emigration has sont communication to tho
Scnate stating that the clerk acted without their
clerk in hs letter to DR. Snow stated that he had posi-
tive instructions to refuse oxaminaton OF the books
Tho prompt action Of the senate in sending for
and papers. has had an excellent effect
bill was reported In tho Assembly by Mr.. Moss
(whg) repeal the law Of the last extra session aboshng
tolls railroads No has any faith tho sinoority
Cf this movement, at the heel of the session.
Tho whig members la caucus last evening, declared
unanimously sf General Scott This settles tho
question with 'our own dear Fillmore" W.
THE CANAL BILL AND THE GovERNoRs MRssAGR-
THE BAR IN THE HUDSON HTO.
FROM A REGULAR CORRESPONDENT
ALBANY, April 8, 1881
The special message Of tho Commissioners Of the Cana
Fund addressed to the Governor has made Its appear
1t states that the Commissioners who sign the
communication, having learned from tho Governors
message that In consequence Of the attendance
tho Attorney General to tho mandamus suits. he has
deemed Dccessary to apply to the Legislature for powor
to appoint counsel to watch tho ntoress tho State
They suggest Tint al difficulty may bc avoided by the
employment by the Commissioners Of such counsel as
may be dcs gnated by the Governor and they oor to
employ and pay them. Their power to do so will bc
found in section 3, title 2, chapter part !, Revised
Statues They further state that John g. Spencer has
been employed by tho Auditor to argue tho and Is
fully competent to do They do not believe additional
counsel be Of any essential service but they willing
that oyey facility shall be Afforded tho Governor pre-
senting his views to the court and therefore mako the
s. Chaeld and 5. Il. Church. the Commissioners Of the
Canal Fund.
Tho contractor for removing the bar In the river at
Cnstleton tacs that he will have nine feet water tho
channel for the passage Of boats by Saturday next and
further that ho will all tho distractions interior
ing with commercial purposes In fortnight
THE CANAL BILL sSCoNsTIrUTroNAL.
ALBANY, April 8, 1862
The 7aas has received adviccs that the Judges OF tho
Supreme Court of the Second district have unanimously
confirmed tho decision of Judge Brown, declaring the
Canal bill to lc unconstitutional
COURT OF APrnALs.
ALBANY. April g. 1852
Justice Gardner announced that in consequence Of the
absence Of Chief Justice Rugges the mandamus case
could not be argued till Monday next.
No. 5-R..sN drria'it against Pistor, implicated
spondeniSnbmtcd upon printed arguments and psints
Henry Hogebocm for appellant and NJ Schoonmaker for
respondent
No. 2s-BcH suror Sc respondents against Leggeu and
others Ears, GppeIantsSubmited upon printed argu-
ments and points. Howard Jr, counsel.
No H. Ca reserved cause ).-Waien .idm'r, &C., aud
others, eifeonts agaisf Murray and Others respondents
Argued. John II Reynolds for appellants and Murray
Hoffman for respondents
Nos 81, % and a3, called and passed.
No. A.-Iio,iCod, appellant against Nc Moho, &C., res
Tondens.-Judgment affirmed by default. N. Hill Jr,
council
No. a5, called and passed.
No. 96Erans. appellant agoinsf Root responden-Sub
mtted upon printed arguments and points N. Howard
Jr.. counsel
! Nus IL. NJ. 4. aud 100 ,isu aaa f.4- ed
80. iei. rCe.fca.
No being ready for argument the court adjourn
ID till tomorrow n,crnng at 10 o'clock.