Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1852-06-08

..,,s-hi, was given TO him by tho resolution OF
h as n,ee Of courts OF justice. mr W. pfeierIea "
he conns Of The ninoritybut the House have adopted
substitute and forced him to vote upon then In
he e s resolution Of the committee. He should vote
's a. the original message IN ms opnion' aa contain
~ erroneous, and certainly, wihon, inc eH
Ns"s W." might be productive OF mischief. Mr. W. would
an, from the reading Of the record OF Hatcher case
:ss",h Of murder-the Governor IN MS eSe" y,
he thought otherwise Testimony VIII stEiSs
me different ninds and while Mr. W. dlllefeu from te
dlefs in lis ACT committing the punishment oil dacii-
, in sheer justice he asserted from his opportunities OF
,,sring his opinions that there was not hrme souheer
W. within the broad limits of the commonwealth, IN MS
10 the relations of and slave, than the Gov
and this correspondent with the record OF ms past HE
ss he Mr. w. should vote tor the resolutions OF the mno-
w he could not vote for the preamble. laccomphshed no
banta good and was fraugh with mischief as piece.
DENT If this house can make judicial review OF any isolated
na.don BY the Governc in case oil may In case
# white man; and If the design be- as the preamble IN Inc
case asserts influence the Executive oy the opn
inns Of the law makers and thus the Executive ~
~. discharge of its duty, it is emnently improper i
legislative, executive and judicial departments OF '
srnment are BY Constitution made separate ana
Aya;n-whe Mr W. agreed in the legal views eAp e,,o;n
Inc preamble in parts it written IN ~ nsnIt
Of rony calculated TO wound the feelings ~ mari Tho
The Governor. II this Mr.. W. could nave oph,ed roht
people in their .mary ines,ng hy NAV think proper re-
on n the acts of Their public servants nu. VIC
ire shoud act with entire courteTy, md de,iv;na s
spar.men, ., Common fountain of authority with itself
Mr. w could orbear references 70 o ~ ~
toe &c While the democratic party have been divided,
rt hi nsr,v with one exception, (Mr. MOORE of Haui
- have come the rescue In SOLID phalanx aud nave
S ,,ined the report Of the minority OF the committee.
FREE SEaRoEs, &c.
a. RDowS of Stafford moved that 1000 extra copies OF
:. S ION its second reading) time ago reported,
s ,, The committee slaves and free negroes be printed
'S W. Ri RoRssox of Norfolk, opposed said motion
n. DuLARp moved 10 amend Mr. BRowss motion by |
.os.,utiog in lieu of 1000" 5000" Rejected
TIE question REQUIRED the motion OF MIR. bRo%S 10
mini 600 copies of said bill.
II, B. supported his motion: 49,
" hoped The House wond print the extra copies OF this
Lii Tie existence of The free negro population in this Stale
W.. great and growing evil. Their number IS already
49,. and is growing at .npd pace He had iaoored TO
,1s a remedy and The bill under consideration was tho
!, :; his cuieayors. H did regard it harsh
na hu; rather measure OF kindness 10 The free ne
s They incapable of taking proper care OF them
I've, End this bill places them under safe guardianship
49,; ,hcy could sufficient 10 transport them 10
s location more suitable for them than this State. But
wss otherwise the welfare Of the whites would DC an
lining consideration with him. He came here to egis
~. ~ me whites and for the blacks. He would seek
:. r.cmo;e the welfare of his own constituents.
IN hs, c asked of the House, was 10 print the bill 30
"a, cold be circulated in the recess and public opinion
liza. u,nn the subject and made known to gentlemen
nh,n hey return here next wlner
N. RICE OF Wssmorelanj having complained of Mr.
ps,ws and others, for moving, subsequent day, the
w. Bs,wS said ,ha, the gentleman from Wesmoeland
~ C,npaned u himself and others for calling the previ
- rss.ion In Ieplv he would address q remark two
" ~, ro,anan He dill not wish have the time of the
usas tasted in itc and useless discussion BY moving
=. ..yous question: he put stop to speeches from the
nsman AM which he considered unnecessary and
.ori;ae He saved the lime OF the House, and by saving
lime he saved money. This was what his constituents wan
MI Those nf the gentleman from Westmoreland did not
The gentleman thought that the previous question ought
M 10 teaypsd TO prevent gentlemen from deriving
,aiumaon from de5aers who could inform them. MIR.
savs did not regard ibis school TO teach gentlemen
n, SUBJECT OF their debate He did here
IN, lea lessons from others. He should call the prevl-
whenever he thought time could be saved and
he would close b. calling it on the pending question.