New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-04-24
SupERIoR CouRr-SpeciaL Term-D G


cisi s-By Judge MITCHELL p Lee, Jy, sgt Rosoa-
feidDeendant brought up to be examined under
der in relation 10 his property He brought mp SINH
ton. examined and dismissed He 10 be dis
charged The Court held that in order to examine debsr
decson of facts must he shown from
those that formerly existed which the here
Order dismissed. but without costs.
Burnett agt BHydett Wessey-The allegations to tho
parties intending to leave for California avoidance Of credi
tors having property &C. not sustained Defendants must
Samud H. Jadson ast Clark & Uiqhimas Renyy. Sadie
bury, and othes-On claim or money alleged to have
been received from the Corporation assignments OF
tracts Motion for reference granted
Before Judge Edwards.
Elizabeth Harrington by her merit friend agt Fain9ton-
Harriet UTdy agt Mayk Wray-Diyorce granted
ARGUMENT TERM-Before judge Edwsris-Raassgs ast
Mc(ioiH and ohsTo 81 400 and interest being
onehaf the amount paid BY the estate OF the late Aid
ONe one of the suretie. Of Mr. Layden some years
of the surees and is contended he bound to pay
half The suit by the administrator of the late Aid ON
to hold AID ON harmless while on nth the part Of dssnse i
was said that Aid ON agreed To take the whole risk De-
Geo r. STANDBY ast james Watson Weob-Action or al
legged libel The case came up on demurrer Argument wss
heard Mr.. Ring for defense and Messrs J. Graham and
Evans for complainant. Decision reserved.
SUPERIOR CoURT-Before Judge Oak
eyHugh Ddrds and ioite against Judith Bogart-ThiS
case has been already referred to- MIS- Is grand niecs
married in 1859 she being then but !! or IL years OF ass
about months when he committed il was stated soma
oense against the laws and left and has not since been
heard o. In lga1 divorce rom hm was granted giant oy inc
marriage In lSi9 Mr. Davds offered for her hand but his
father required settlement for Mrs before he would give
his IL said Mr. James Bogart 10 Mrs 3
promise to pay the Of the child 900
year for life and Miss b. Doth of them very aged and
wealthy personsl similar promise to pay Mrs Siom
year life and the father OF Mr. Dsyids him like
promise aud also purchased country seat for them at acost
of$4ooo on the Delaware, in Pennsylvania, where Mr. and
Mrs d. now reside.
Mr. and Miss b, subsequently declined paying, alleging
there had been Misunderstanding &c Separate sns have
been brought 10 The present suit on the paper
given by Miss b. as follows:
received promise pay Helen Mas souberbsls
thousand dollars annually quarterly payments daring her
The instrument dated in November 1919:
The present suit $3.50 being for three quertera
Various detenses up Verdict for plaintiff with in
terest, 1913.
SUPERIOR COURT-GenerdL Term.--Ma-
agt Jones aThs appeal from adecsion ofJudge
Campbell directing ial by jury as to the validity OF tho
will of the late John Mason.
SUPREME COURT-JErFERsoN CoUNTV.
Hudson Rir~ Railroad %. agt Him. H. Sherman.-fhis
from the Hudson River Railroad Co by false and fraudulent
representations the extent OF the injuries received by
him at the collision ON their road near Croton, IN December
The Judge charged that on proved the plaintiffs
entitled recover and the Jury found verdict accor-
dinghy for the whole $3.50 obtained with costs
CIRCUIT CoURT-Before Judge Roose-
vet-ames Mccoy agt Chas GoveSut to test the owner
ship Of horse alleged have been bought OF plaintiff but
the conditions complied with and plaintiff took the horse
back into bis possession by giving bonds The horse
said had been bought by John Gore, and not Charles Yer
dict for defendant 49,
Benj Dpbed agt Irene Dfdd This is asut for divorce.
Plaintiff s a non-commssoned officer IN the United Ststea
NAVY About four wears ago. it was said he about
Join his ship in Pennsylvania and had been INDUCING In
drink Defendant and himself went to an Alderman IN Phil
sdepba and got married. and lived together for about four
months when he went The divorce on the ground
ofinfdelty Verdict tor plaintiff No defense wS offered
CIRcuIT COURT-Before Judge Rose
yet--Suocessfui plea Of Uswy-Ho,oen Chu,etmdn ayt
J3eardseu r. Lsacs and others.-To recover $loW tho
amount of draft already referred the detenas 20 which
was that Mr. c. in cashng deducted charged al the rate
of ~ Der cent per amum. Verdict for defendant