Richmond palladium. [volume] (Richmond, IA [i.e. Ind.]) 1839-1854, 1852-09-08

ouiy one vote for Catholic mancpation, nn.. W,
Go. NJ Dallas and his p.rty-hi~ head white ming
with blossoms for the grave, once Wee Pr-si~n OF th.
United States aud Preside. nj of the most distinguished
deliberate elective body ia the woridsiates that the
the -Arrt'"ns OF " party winch only Poi'rd one vote
of Il one OF % of their party vote 10,
the measure.
What chance has truth 1f ever rising again. when
crushed earth III, .urh nr,r-ss this
What "onGcr iha, letters forged for Con Scott.
which he wrote, wh-n
Falsrhood puts on ti- face Of simple truth.
And masks !" the h'b'' of plain honesty,
When sit. intends most vtli,ny.'
THENOTE AGAIN
Thr vote in the whole Stat. was. for Dinsmoor.
For SAWYER. Wing -, ,i3~
For Atwood, Free - a19
Atwood had been the regularly nominated Locofoco
candiat-; and the Two Locofoco> Carried 6i.i. II
majority of about i"o-ih'ris over the Whlg vots.-
A nd yet the vote On the Constitution
For Catholic Emhncif alton. 3.51'
Against IT. it...-.....-.t.... .2t.S
1t must be remarked that. in this vote. in 1882.
The great majority of those who voted Tor Catholic
Emancipation were Wings. Indeed the vote agai"s,
Caihoiic Emancipation Is just about the vote which
for Pctc-s candidate for Governor.
THE CONVENTION REASSEMBLES
The Convention rrasscmhed II the 9th Of april
l-.2,-and here we meet with more Locofoco forgery
and talsehood.
ISLANDER REFUTED.
Mr.. Chamb- Rain. the Wing candidate for Governor
aud friend Of Catholic Emancipation in
favor of having the Convention Iourn, and there
fore opposed the proposition TO submit any further
atnenoments 10 The people The people had become
exas,-raied with the Convention, and tired Of is
-lieraiions that Mr. Chanbe said il won Id ruin
tn. chance for Catholic Emanc patton for a century
owd il back upon the m them but this what the
Locooco party seemed TO want TO do up the bu.lnc
at forever to exclude other chances of fu
Lain thus spoke, h. has been accused OF opposing
Catholic Eanc patton" whereas he voted for it in all
its stages aud when Contrary to his advice the sub
ject forced npnn the people again. the erc
h- foretod, it voted dow iecciv-
town in which lac lived K--ne) did give single
' against it, bat gave 2I1 vote. for This
slanderers of Mr.. Chamber rain know. The Concord
fofrio', Of Jan. 3. 1881, says that IN erarr
q"esfion 'rheher Tie Conr~nti hare the nufhorfy
make further "d'e"'s nftr ose m~de shan
hnre bern ncfed Dpon by tie peopie." And they
abuse and siand"r Mr. Chamberlain Cor taking the
rect view of this grave question.
NEW DISCUSSION ON THE TEST
Well. the Convention was two days in session June
lG and l. aud n that time speech-. were made up
on this Catholic Emancipa,io bv M-s.rs. Smith
Chamberlain, Bell Eastman. Woodbury., &c, SC.
but not word did Franklin Pierce say during the
w hole time.
GOV. DINSMOOR'S MESSAGE
Nor is this all. In June 1851, the Legislature as
cnbled, and Pi-rc-s candidate being e-ct-G Cover
nor delivered his message TO the Legislature If
I rankin Pierce had asked hun to put a paragraph
expressing regret at the failure of the last trial
urging support iu the tria ordered he would un-
io"h'rdiy done -bu no, !" place of such ti.,ng
We have the following paragraph rejoicing the de-
feat of Catholic Emancipation, which was undoul,ed-
IS aud approved by Mr. Pierce b-for. i, was de-
vrrrti:
alt apra-en, from this decisive ex,r.ss;op save
.ov Din-mo"r] of the popular Will, the pr-sen.
constitution IS, IN iiie main. entirely satisfactory
arge majority Of the people. This result
'iso Indicates the Instructive lesson which may be
ul Tor guidance he r-aft~r that material or i'm.
'ortant am" nfm-nts TO the Constitution can be cxp-c
ed TO iind acceptance with the people, which is
hing mora than d~ciaratory or their known s-nti-
NE nsi and that II is al unsafe knowl-
'dge OF their opinions when they have h-en dis
n
nation and >cussi"n OF the principles and forms OF
he fundamental law not without their use. If
hey other purpose than to bring clearly
o view the great merits Of old and we'll tried
aud to give the people another oppotun
v TO re affirm ih-r strong and unabated attachmen
o IL" IDinsmoors Message. June. ISL
ii that is not direct approval of tn. people in re-
erttng Catholic Emancipation, then | ignorant Of
What linCuE- means.
LoCoFuco STATE CONVENTION.
In the same month, June, l-5,J the Locofoco. Of
<-~ Hampshire. held State Conv- uion d Concord,
. nominate candidates for State offices 10 be elected
h. following March. when the Anti Catholic test
o be- tired again This Convention passed a series of
esonons rejoicing in the feat OF Catholic Einano
'ation. Herr j. the first resolution:
Resored, That the r-prese the pc ople in
,onv-ntion assembled, congratulate sach other upon
he signal TRIUMPH Of the Democracy of New Harnp
hire all the forms and combinations, of hostile
otrs-, with ~hich they have been obliged TO contend
n the regent State election That W. b-Iuld wh
ride and joyful satisfaction the Democratic party
out from the midst OF the rs hich ~ncompass~d
victorious over the ennity Of open foes and the
r-aeh-ry Of supposed friends pg;h paired
Is CignIty unconpronised. its honor untarni-ted,
Is fundalns ntai doctrines unchan Eed
N0w here We have The whole Locofoco Pierce party
{ New Hampshire rer'eseut.d IN State Convention,
nd taking counsel Of franklin Pierce at Conco.l. inst
the defeat Of the Catholic E,n,ncpatiCa al IN.
revIous el-ciion ana Just after a OF amend
nts had ben ordered to be submitted people
the tame v he the ndIdat-s oud be voted
or and put IN their long string Of resolutions al
nost evsry subject th-v found room for single
'ord IN favor Of Catholic Emanc PATTON 6ut r-loced
nat their fuDdane ntal doctrines had been unchanged
THE DEMOCRAT ON PIERCE& Co
Indeed SO we'll known il that Frank iiu Pierce
nd h,' party were opposed to Catholic Emancipation,
7at the Concord Democrat. published his own city,
nc OF course read by him. in CONSPICUOUS editorial
u shed June D. l-5l, says:
The foiiaT. Of haf Conuen.ian dir,e,iz frac,oy.
tios> Hrnker LEADERS, PIERCE. Alieyton + ca .-ba
>er'ain>d that should >>r Be .ntr,,y sybs.rri
At to the'T partisan BE- caaf uas IN zbo--
on 1Aey saceeedsd. and 10 tk<r Ieloses The honor
NOTHING DONE
Well. from April 1881. to March 1872. Catholic
.rnanc pation was before the people ,h- State Yet
ufing that Ferod Of eleven months. FsAxKtrS PIERCE
ever opened hi- mouth IN favor Of the me asure Ee
'er ne nor his friends called public citing to nd
ocate Il They "a wthai i, lad bee voted down, t~o
one, the last election. and that therefore il n
umtent On every friend liberal -entine
very energy IN its favor During fha, time guam
lty Of resolutions we're drawn up and passed ab (