The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-12-20
Superior Court.

sPresent-Chief Justice oakley ana Hon. judges Dusr
Campbell, Paine. Bosworth, and Bmust
Dec. 18.-DEcIMoNs.-Ihoma Muivehai respondent.
James MSirard sppeusnt Motion for trial denied,
and judgment affirmed. with costs
Samuel Roosevelt re- John BroGn.-Judgment for plaintiff
on verdict
scoo Hayssn respondent ps Theodore W. Bayard appel
liant Order appealed from affirmed with liberty to de
fepdsnt to anfwer In ten days payment Of costs and
on spulating that the whole Issues may be referred
sole referee.
SPECIAL TERN
Before Hon Judge Duer.
James Linden Us. Mary finn GrahGn.-Demurrer over
ruled, with costs.
tions OF David seden, Thomas vermilyes William @.
Noyes and Richard Ogden allowed and rehearng or
dered upon the points excepted to
Before Hon Judge Bosworth.
.9mss Tenney Joseph IT, Robbins Order striking out
fourth count as irrelevant and redundant and also that
days, OF be stricken out as irrelevant, &c.
Law IatelIigence.
SUPREME CovRT THE UNITED STATES -DKcBMssR
O-ko. l1-Jsseph Wisusu plaintiff IN error EAwrd
Hal u. si-Ths GGunsut Of this causs vas continued
in error ard sonesaed BY Governor Seward the plata
tiff N srrsr. Adjourned.
DrcEnsrR n No 4l-.,Jsh~ .aspder's .fdminisratsrs
e. a., cs. Matthias Aspdtns yddminisfyasrs, e aiAP
pss iron the Circuit Court Of tho United States for East
srn Pennsylvania. The decree Of the Circuit Court in
this caats was aknruasA with costs.
Ne IL -Samnel Ssmpie e. q sppsis.ts. ShaSrecA
Barnss This submitted to the Court ths
record and printed Argument BY MT v 4. Howard, for
Ne ia WNisw II Rsvwend's Lane ylsisfif N srrsr
Us Nicholas LorgwcM This sauss was argued by Mr.
Chase for the plalatn in error, and submitted on q
printed argument by Mr. 6tanbsIy for the dsfG in
error
The United States sppeusnss o. tie CAiftmseAes H.
dams OF 81 This cause argued by Mr. Attorney
General Crittsnden for the sppelants and submitted
printed argument by Messr Taylor and Jsnn fer the
appeses Adjourned
Dec Is p. D. vroom. Esq Of NswJersey was I'd.
mitted an attorney and counseRer Of this Court.
No q The United States, sspssNs W. The Chstimap-
shes Indans ct al This appeal from thu Circuit Court
United states for Louisiana was dismissed
Nos, % and 23 ID n Hvmsn, plaintiff n eysr, %
Jsmes Phaien.-The Argued BY Mesrs Allen
and O. Y. Johnston for the defendant In error
No. a. George RsndeH e a. pL1s3ifs in errsy cs The
DtispHe and Rsrifsn Canal Compsnv THIS cause was
gusd by Mr. Read for the defendant error and Submit
ted on . printed argument by Messrs. AdAmsad and
vroom for the plaintiffs 10 error. Acjourned
DC 10 james w. Gerard, Jr Esq, Of New York
was admitted attorney and councillor OF this court
No Is ID. LAvieri e. 81, plaintiff 70 evrsr W. j. n
snd J Walker This causs srgued By Mr. Chase for
the defendants In and submitted prnted argu
nent BY hessrs Grosbeck nox, and Walker for the de-
fsndsntS In error.
No rs. r. o. LEROY ct a.. plaintiffs ia ever, vs. Ts-
ham Bsofhs.srhe argument Of this caused was CON.
nsseed by Mr.. Gilstt for the paintns In srror-Ad-
Drc. IL Richard J. Bowie, Esq. OF Maryland aud
Plrt Smith Esq of lows admitted attorneys and
counseiors Of this court
No I2oSs,s,<i Paek,rsod plaintiff In error rs John
Whe ct al On the motion OF MIR. Crit,cudcn, this vr
Of 10 tho Circuit court OF the United States for Lou
hisns visa docksted and dismissed with costs under IN
4ed rule of court.