The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1852-03-26

The presents principal deuy and proceed
The dis question depends the construction 70 be
Tue the plainln contend, place,
actual shows that oodwo discovered that BY psss.
saaes q inc board a. point while The board passes ni@an
ration panns aud that the patent for such invention OF aus
place, commended that as the specification
aned directions which show the Of carriage OF bed aanst
allowed it, the paen,ss is clearly
lied 10 cover all the effects which follow from these directions
that's, that the patent for idea all
msenan o carrying e mo practical effect Or for result and
The h question u.s. WHISTLER such woad be valid The
general rule thar patent must be NOT for principle result
but for Tie mechanical by which the principle carried into
Without however undertaking TO
dcover Of new and important truth secure 70 himself all the me
which he clearly claims such truth 20 be
his discovery and exclusive right Has this been done by the pat
In The patent Of oas The specification mentions the result Of re-
eontended and The claim does either and IL hsd
would be that had ascertaned
2 be no o. us p" o more so % s re-
describe The real invention the pans case must rest
What claimed therein as the invention William Wood.
such herein described in continuation WIN rollers or any a.aio.
when cutting upwards Or rom le reduced pned TO s un-
The effect Of the pressure rollers these operations beng
10 Keep boards steady prevent
ing the boards toward the centre Of the cutter wheels whilst
Of The plane T. q liz The boards directly up against the
zion oceaoned BY The pressure Of the rollers ,,
M from claiming inc ass OF s
or suggest either OF them.
neSion specheaion drawings the whole instrument
ss bu are 70 s
Is begins saying full sss
Ing plank William Woodwork deceased"
ns sas sasa asauess
after d s on the n"Ss ss as
Con separate they may % placed on % against
sy ass blaming
preferred carriage plank board be ope
rated may be moved forward BY means Of rack and pno
Tie devices wen known advancing carriage
aa cssd ss sp %oa a o
on @ sS 90 Dan 1 % aa Or
contrary that i which 4 made The
with its surface and made 70 Gu, upwards from The reduced
injury by gritty natter the board plank
and better paned than when moved in the reverse d
There afterwards reference aud explanation Of the draw
pscvs pinsps operating parts o. The ma
a ne 40 Auu a. be CAPABLE Of two
time the axis of the planning wheel being placed
again. The roller. & which stand vertically to ss
thus prevent cutters drawing me plank up
from it. bed eTs Om % or sy
mschin In single horizontal machines The horizon
ABOVE 's ,hen is 70 feed 1s board
ps describing and
A. c q s leu
% sS s sa r o. sso
thickness and correctly tongued and groovea"
To nee, the different plank boards the
bearing Of the shat. Of The may BE- made s
made 50 as to raise the board or plank up the
parts the specification pertinent to The
the sids q he Soac m,ihes from The plane al parts
plane III. ma ne Of be-. board ss 70
ohem msnoned ifhy existed IN the mind Of
sn.m which he respect claim
act be enlarged BY 70 The ard ing hu
some MECHANISM.
Another view presented by the pars is this
patent organized mncne containing performing certain
and and a t.su
Infringement although have rotary cutter pressure roller
on cannot Be mainmined The claim clearly
sa . ss nys s Of William
s Of roary sueh ys ~
The boards from being drawn by the planes when cutting up
se .sGi q from "' 'aa''' . p'''' '''''
eondsrsdas claim for ecmenaiion Here are
be used conncxon with the residue Of the a.
combination The rotary cutters pressure residue
Of ne machine thu. fse ooao0 o mah my
cutter plate bedplae in this inquiry the most
be treated a third elomen, in the continuation
Here advert to The HIN machine The plaintiff CON On
venon secondly, taby the true construction Q, The plaintiff
not Is imms,ea and fully BY the experts
n latter proposition be then !. is no, only mn
OF priority bu, also reference to the question q 70.
machine then equally aid US In ascertsinng
from whether Invented before or ahe the
however, looked upon this point, and am
satisfied establishes the priority Of the Hill INVENTION and inc
| pre-e1istenee of his machine. go,
The then Noross the PLAINTIFF combine
uon rotary similar To the panuhs bedpae
which towards The axis Of the cut
ter and which the board down
upon the plaintiffs machine the pressure roller has two
Ist Preventing being drawn up by the cutter.
3D. Pressing the board down upon the bed
that the defendanu machine, wnat
is called the performs OF these functions and he pea ne
other both being performed BY these two elements al
though differently distributed, tits the painih combination Du
Hin machine there roller and bed neee wnen
Offices but by the same
the bed the board being drawn 20
Of and the roller presses e acwn
the bed. then, the PLAINTIFF patent covers every m
would cover me MN mach"e- "s
construction therefore, cannot be admitted
The panhs witnesses, when asked In what part o. me asena
machine they panufs' pressure roer are divided In
bed because that prevents
being drawn into me axis o me cumer
of the pantns roller omers ma
board
upon the Hin machine The roller performed inc same
bed the ONCE OF
vaa,;nr Of
machine contained the plaini
had also bed piece and rotary cutter would
maintained The truth is that amer the Hill
machine make
Of the clemenstha is some new mode Of
invention be regarded Improvement upon
this Improvement, then he nnnges, wns
may add with whatever invention he
II he does This Improvement, he does NOT mummy,
work the ultimate esu,
Whr them the improvement which Woodwork msoe On va
Hill mnchne2 He took the rotating cylinder when W. ays ~.
bed only change arrangement Of inc hrce ere
mcns But transferred to the pressure oe na ~.