New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-09-18

them psSsn regions OF the earth or air. but they will
,hosr DO own exo,m, that notwithstanding
nuity or any inventions they have monOpozed the
of heat when applied IN rubber sod sulphur This claim
r,peat eoes much further than the alleged lsNvery Of
1874 IL holds 10 and patents the triple pound
acted upon by hest and according to their present avows
all kinds OF heat applied to comp Of
Of which sulphur sud rubber without lead may be com
poner parts Mr Cutting here read the specification othe
grant OF 1912, PAGE IS
1t will be observed that this very remarkable sp.cf-
cation 1t contains lone rubber ii. n.iurs state,
exploits call attention to its remarkable titl- after which
follows the natural history Of rubber and account Of
sssed e,ertiops Of Mr. Goodyear II is the longest most
cn involved and contradictory specification that
member to have een and sd maby adapted 10 conceal
beneath multitude Of words the extraordinary character Of
the claim Even snp rubber, when exposed 10 he, 10
within the inventor according this grant Of 1912 COW
er every portion OF tns Territory described 10 the original
PATENT and and above that wneu the application Of
steam has bees discovered and when has since been
found that other degrees and kinds o. heat may be used
when has been found that the dissolution OF water
steam equivalent produced; then In lsi9,
and not before they surrender their orig grant apply for
II with infinite wit drawn that may be deemed
claim as doe. in terms claim, the application ogenersl
heat TO the cmifg of rubber
But the learned gentlemen opposed say they do not
undsrsar this grant to be 20 large Il more exped
emit the, think 10 insist upon construction which
would shock Of the Court aud 81 the community
Trey mode the claim TO the application of dy heat TO
rub er mixed with sulphur with phur and aBy other
tubaucs But the OF phl be detected in
% or by any prosess In the shape OF hour or gas OF
sulphur thew insist 1t falls within thsr gIai and they
lor ger conne the the triple compound
II II be that the -four Of phur sulphur in
form nd sable the manufacture of faori: Of
rubbef you that aud admit the construction Of
be charged By the 9th side II n ths
grant of MONOPOLY of the whole ud. rubber m.nuftur
business at occupies the whole ee nent Of heat
IN Of any kind description known 70
be Known Gsiy the INGENUITY OF ire gentlemen on the
other side TO improvement for which future
patent be granted by tire Patent Once which will
be An Infringement. Any proce. which employs 10 any
degree the article ~ sulphur IN which Of any kind
be applied to rubbef viii be infringement this
p. patent Surely n At be 90 n NOR extensive Than
inv huaf
with examDaon OF these psteut st the requ., Of my
leaIred etd and associate intending hereafter submit
some other points Of law that necessarily arise upon Them
suc foI the uurposc Of drawing your HoGors attention with
more facility % the evidence.
will remark now. in regard to Hsyward's slpher pat
thst dog to the testimony It IS void for the want
orCvey but if otherwise will his patent,
tie pl4 compound as aSs0dore5 the public, by him
by Others. with his knowledge usins aud selling it be-
re hrs application for patent and fer the eVden;e OF
this is my ouy 10 refer your onors 70 the testimony
Then with regard t. ths patent OF S44 which is claimed
and the application OF heat THAT triple compound will
sift that acss validity because, upon ths evidence It
used by GOoovesr ana If that lacks validity well
Haywa'd's sulpher patent then the ensuinE branch
heat either TO the triple pound the patent OF
1874 the application Of heat generally to India Rubber
mixed With materials Of which sulphur shall be
pon,Dt art or oct nw when Goodyear alleges that be
invented It is mainly to thoie Questions OF fact that
shall apply the evidence AMI IL Will invoye 1voiga-
to IS to how far Mr. Hayward vas really as between hin
and cyea the reel olscovere rot oily OF the uss OF
sulphur but of'he triple compound and low SULPHUR
sps the application Ct atmospheric artificial heat u
Tateotahe; and how far rubber by Itself without any
otbtr Ingredient is substance capable Of tvng yual
lz'd-tnet pm fss pen lufoo ucso 10 lasr CAS- l3
Iurp OF ctaact rzne the pstsIt Of 1914 Ths pat
ofi84g submit is void, because, Upsu lis fac, as
arer - legal con trnctl2a goes lar any nFea-
that be gathered from the patent Of fi y ca res
win al that IA giant conferred sad add5 hesd the
Application OF feat generally rubber or 10 rubbr aud SUI
thur Being vastly eXts sve .laO the feA' invention
tom tsA This bjecou ty tie idea that the Of the
Con NE ret Of fsefts n issuing tie new eIa-t bnal
a. coIolove IL A. officer acting under epec!a and
ls.0e only vhee the paens is lucpcsee invai, By
reason q def Give or n ert dssc Upton Of the iusn
I'm ~ whsIe tarouR7 l-ao' anae or mistake, n ons
thing Sh he pa,-nt- In oot o. fact die lsefsd.
H. either OF these tsnee the Commissioner Of Patents
rPCn srcn evidence as ,ls oe saa--Vy 10 MN, ara OF
y lch he tn sole gdg e. the mistakes OF the
oo afeur and Issue grant Neither OF these cases
exist. Was there Ary ambiguity In express, On "1ich req
dered tie tatent OF 1854 iooprrayc iuysil That will
be Pretended The - su ot g. 10 a. much more ais
IN tLhso for clesues OF expression and - much eer
from al iguity than that OF ~ light Of the 10
brtteT hsu that reflected by the moon The enc Is re-
marEabe for its persJcuty and freedom tom obscuntg
the other have most sedIous effort - Or
thu some indefinite nera, ana infans'be i'sn WIN
tat clear distinct patent Of lSii before age
been able resist the custp, a there was moro in
gcnU ty moe effort aud more study expended upon the
pat, NJ of IS49 10 discover words t) mysy ans mise4d
than OF actual intelligence ability aud research IN the lnVen
Tpon lis face IL bears the ma ka Of deliberate and ul
intent the part Of those who framed it. to monopozs
than the invention Of lsif The Pl'n'ir however
that he hes supple evidence Ia this that sod
wear WAS not only the inventor OF the t"e FOUND,
Which is the CHIEF sue Of the petent Of 1874 bat as1 that
he od invent all that tbs patent Of 8f9 gives hun II it
were granted that Mr. Osy is concluded By
Coponer Of Paens from the exist, nee OF any error IN
ths fist pateut or II an, omission mistake; still insist
Ist the ps'entee himself undertakes place before the
Court OF alleged error or mistake II Il then
cunpete p for the defendant, avail himself Of lis sdve
sr proof 10 shog thst dsproves his pfetensons Ii
Was the SIDE thai due " the paentee 70
,ccspIt in some way for the remarkable difference in
lsrgusge documents ana TO attempt to show that
Go d was n fact the Inventor Of all tnat granted 6y
the pa OF $40 Have they cone It Fer from IT, By
Nj
page 40 aud OIL who wesrs to the handwriting OF letter
written by Goodyear Dr. Jones and which the only
cySence adducec by the complainant On his point
Honors will see hos 'sraily they hsve failed
srriserulD Dec Is. lsis.
DS Tros, JeNs'-D.ar W Il ,. - T,t ,o% nis, Will Won
heats Iad Rubbrr whether Hsauacur-d o. not IN
oven OF Sc room with gehs IT, or 'apn.'u, g. pre- s1
the oor by potash Sc n not 50 p.r'alaf about prefer that
hk Tor an amendu ept ut future time Please wne ne al tbs
Ila,e Yours respectfully, CBiR-Es GOODMAN.
E.Hprr IN No s." on PItr or Pl.sruT, c. w. HEvros,
W.,rr>oros Dec y. lsls
Ism m when you wish to have claimed heating
Der ~hseeI mar " P P". ~ az o''n ~ s c ~
eesbns the spec6caop' which - not done 80 FAR
uIea sum concerned aud ~itout soe s1plana
ton hom cannot understand H. BY unannactured iods
Rubber should 'er,iaud the b,tes, % impaired
Are these heated Why Have
rh ~th AL the particular hat insert The thing nIte'
patents Remember that any matter be
months cone Should you Mr. GAy please
say tt have ns either n the
obn patsn You may at your cOnyeriese remit me
! hundred dollars. account of services
Yours. respectfully, THOMAS 2. JONES.
on the back Of the eer black blue aud red nh tie
following:
Of 18Th reed incl de the sulphur got. Do
heating ctured sum r-nt further description "
In the margins ~n,ien IN dihefeut hand, David Hal
Bisck nik. Blue 1k. I Red nh
This ref ned by my learned friend and brother
(Nr Bracyl opening This The first criticism that
ae- whether not the evi@ence III reference 10 the au
the Hioity Of tins letter satisfactory think II Is not be-
cause hle the exists Of establishing its senuinenea
indispuiab and when witnesses In battsons have been
examined and otheTs the brothers Of Cody ear and
lis snd licensees and Others familiar with mis-
Handwriting Il reserved for member Of the har who
him write, and who had had hut verv slight
qantance with him. BY Independence and
who partner Of one OF the counsel In this cssn 10 prove