New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-06-12
- nr CoMMoN PLEAs.--Before


CoSss E.sac AlezaHdsr sgt Herman B'TnheimsT -
Jsdes ps damages for alleged violation IT agreement
70 sasnt should purchase, at Sderla SALE on
81 %s,op Of judgment BY pliinun 70 delsnasnt Nv
sso.L Of plaintiff contained ID DIS store "a %
t1 oez res,ore It 70 the possession Of planu' out
90 We after purchasing and getting possession
III ore i,-defeDdani denying any sucn az rec
r,'uto el,ining that what be purchased was ooua
psbf ia sale on the Judgment snd execution Al.
~. referred 10. Motion "Is s9o sua' 1ue
ray t.ed The Court considered that no such agree,
- heen proved but even II IL had been II would
rrerf hA "a "A The law would not recognize IT, II oe
se Dee" rope of other creditors. The complaint was
Snsssed
IT COMMISSIONER OFFICE-ChGrge
- v "a Make a RerolL-Sevcn seenen, part OF
eks n the bark Heicon, were arrested, charged oy
ns Id.m, Of the vessel with attempt at revolt while
Cs.s Isy at Havana, 2lst April last 1t Is said they
,dsea 70 do dutyI
Carr OF GENERAL FRIDAY
". ,he Recorder and Aid. DenmaR and Ward -
% h, Hiphaay RO6b1y-Peter Hollis and Hugh
IT, were placed on trial, charged with having, on
y. S,t t assaulted Mr.. Henry Holmes OF Troy while
he - TIE Five Points and having robbed him OF
seysslook containing 50. The evidence OF the guilt
Pssss .,i.oners was conclusive, they having been
@n sfew minutes after the commission OF the as
~ Officer McCauley of the Sixth Ward, and iden
fs 1870 M Holmes. The prisoners were convicted
r'so g,s,rsd 20 the State Prison for 10 years each
o. ss.s III Gpihg-Wm and Samuel Downing PLEADED
a. ~ one to stealing, the other 10 receiving gold
ss cb valued at $35, the property OF Joseph b Hen
80 The prisoners were remqnhed Tor sentence
a., fr FOrgay-Edwin Wilbar, young man OF
nse,.,le appearance, was placed on Lrlal, charged
~ hsvips forged and uttered check on the Chemical
W. va. h, geo Some testimony taken, but the
- ,.as uos concluded when the Court adjourned Tor
the day
FIRST DISTRICT CoURT-Before Judge
Green Important suits as Butchers and Olers-Ihe
Minor &C. against John Peters The Common Council,
n III April last adopted an ordinance giving enlarged
,osers 70 the City Inspector, 70 removal OF dead
ssusrak &c. The 4th section Is as iollows
sTbe contractor or contractors Tor removing the
,s,ssid dead animals, bones and other refuse sub
s.pees, sha furnish, from time 70 time, suitable
number Of carts to be licensed under the hand and seal
a The City Inspector, for the purpose OF Transporting
M removing said dead animals bones and other refuse
sbstanees in said City and no person shall transport
or remove any dead animals other refuse substances
rpless licensed aforesaid, under the penalty OF SO
Ior each oense, to be recovered from the person or
penoDs so removing, or the owner or owners OF the
ysbicles used for the purpose, seveTay and respec-
lively
Under this ordinance the Corporation has given
contract 10 the oHal, &c, to VIM b. Reynolds,
for YEAR, at 50 500 month. Dir. H. claims that the
section Of the ordinance includes all bones, dry Chose
having been boiled in cooking, &c) well as bones
from The butchers shops &c. and that he ia entitled to
them.
pesIed, BY Mr. Johnson, who has establishment at
with horse and cart, TO house In
Tbrdst Kew.York on 22d May, TO purchase quantity
of bones dry He purchased 10; at bushel, aud
while loading up his cart with the bones nc was arrested
BIZ police officer, and this suit Instituted.
Testimony taken.
m was said on the trial that much money can be
made by the bones skin &C. OF dead horses aud other
refuse matter which belong to the contractor.
twas shown the trial. that bones are an article OF
and that at least 100000 year are paid
for them In this City. They are not only used Ter man.
gactnriDg purposes such handles OF knives, &c but
for clarity ing sugar also used for medicine, and other
purposes IL also shown that green or fresh bones
rom the butchers shops and slaughterhOuses, bring
large prices as an article of food ia the preparation Of
soups, &c.
ever applied 10 take away the bones In question.
There were various points raised among them as 10
Inc right of the Corporation to pass such an ordnance
The Court considered the main point to be that the
orlinar &c merely applied to refuse bones, aud not
b bones which are an article of merchandi,e-that
these were not refuse bones but on the contrary has
been proved that they articles OF merchandise
and the Gaze clearly did not come within the ordinance
On this ground without any necessity OF looking 1T me
other points, judgment must be for defendant. Judg
ment accordingly.
IN, Manor &c ACT PentO-This was similar suit
only related 10 fresh, or green bones. Defendant
was employed 10 remove some bones from a butcher
shop In Frst ay and while doing was arrested by an
officer as In the other Similar points were raised
in the other suit and judgment also given in favor OF
defendant.
CouHT CALENpAR-This DGy-CouRT
on COMMON PLEAs-Part Nos Cos, liz Liz, l,lsl,
lls lle5 l,ls9 ll9l. ll93, Lbs, ~ Ivy, lSol
lsn ioO5 i.9O7 1900 f2ll, 2l3, 1,2l5, 12l7. Part
--Nos no 724, FAC 7GO 762 76l, 7GS, no az, 7'6,
rs, $50, 7ei, $50, Ts5, 100. -,
SUPREME CouRT "A Special Term for motions will
" held by Judge Roosevelt at II O'Clock, Ne soon