The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-06-09
Supt rior Court.
PART FAR 4.
.nsara Hhf.f In9tt,a Only1ax


.IrNr T.-He1Hp Mason Is. JdcoJ n y. Cockroh-This
suit is brought to 81 ass 90 for -four sold
PENDANT the fail Of 1850 The defence by Messrs Bra
ny and Fogarty is that defendant i hour broker and
such purchased these goods the broker Of a Arm
then doing business in this city under the of
OConnar Purcell who have since failed and left tbs
country having first paid all Of paintGs bill except
S2s5 which they refused pay gronnl that part
OF the -four almost worthless and that plaintiff
seeks to Fl ON defendant who l. perfectly solvent
a bin due 10 HIM ty 0'Connor Purcell who Also
luteiy nsolyen The defendant also produced agree.
meni between plaintiff aud o'Connpr & Purcell leave
dispute in relation TO This flour g arhtraors and put
in evidence receipts OF plaintiff showing payments nv
draft on account e o'connor 4 Purcell The plaintiff
denies that sold the goods to fendant broker
that he had any knowledge Of 0'Connor 4 Purcell the
transaction, and also denied their payments account
Of the debt The Court charged The jury that il de.
ondani had iii closed The Of his principal before
delivery OF the -four as there was no memorandum
Sealed verdict this forenoon.
JuNr She jury brought in sealed verdict for the
plaintiff S317 o.
an alleged breach Of contract being osNY <lr Bene
act il. counsel for III plautiT sad .hss 49, settled
II was understood that the alleged br-s1 II contract
was rs 10 MI Haymonds claim 70 certain slare IN the
Cetrier and Enquirer which the defendant denied sep
aaton between the parties took pluce IN Consequence Of
hr Raymond froc soil artio written princip lily dur
inc The absence Of co. tbb IL the Court of Vienna
and tr. Raymond mnenced a suit to his right
part ownership or comp alton for the breach OF
covenant.
PART SECOND.
1cfore fon Judge SandfoId
ACTION FOR LIELL--IHE PRIVILEGE or REPORTING;
PROCEEDINGS or copPrs on rIsrrop
.It,Nr ,r,r.5oy p,,L.. v, Ii Go Jts f,,.
re Joroec G,,,,,, ,,5 I'o,s H. ,,J,1 't; r ,'
tion for alepea iihcl contained il, M c, nrhi,shaa :;
The ,,l,,, ~ Ma III, Ti "a ~ p''ne. =,
ON .usnic;on az RAID l,rensy - raa 49, -" 90
ruent at come, Il onrrar i ,iot ne lai,. nv 4; 80,
man under a,sr. hi t,tllnr i; >, tI ~, , ia ~
iairm,nfs oT1d ne,nJ,er az t'ai7,r,tia en-. 49, ~
LARGO family ana broraLt tbn,, M r.s,.,t,1 . -
them had b,a,, i1y,bg NJ ,h Npv VI 49, ~" ~
hold onnointmrnts Il, r,al;for,io od a., -; ~
decide ,botbrr IL, - 800, 49,; 80 ". ~. ~
r,tJ,r h.s rrcrab, - =. I. - IL 49,. - I, ~
Nm, l., a., ~. - 49,, w.. ''uts "tu pihoei
- 10 la ,r,,,o','sa .h5a, ~ ,y =, ~,
- ~, a - $50, -! 49, - N.l-,a' w
t h ~ NV Wv. :. ~, ne - ,uii' a. wen hs
- e 80, Sene - 'i''""sn 'ue "1Eiu. pne
, go = - " w., "a, ~ nlN. the p,lag
a sI,ifF 49,, So ~ - ~. va wy -. w VI
li,;ss 'Neh "g 'sel'uie Appe'Fe' thst ue
vs. q S'Ntee - n"l'cr r.I'fI "heh Two othk
. 1s 800 WeIt saa !, nave been so'eh and
81 y ias'S' .iAe "hefV w, complaint was
"i.i "ie'iins' counsel calle1 upon we jury
~ the aeEFlauoh OF the ohencc com
itt.o ~ tIe worn answers OF me defendants which re
tts. ane charge merely aitefing the amount OF money
800 ~ PlS2 souis't resu the libel ana put IL IN
'N,eehee Dut e''led no wines
MI Is Blunt on lebalf OF the defendants. submitted
mat the article was not Libel and he moved to
uhss inc conlpIdlnt There was no allegation in the
report o' "a' newspaper editor mad perfect right
~ pulhh ~ me uist place the article does not state
hat 'he pian stole the money; the allegation is that
ne wa arrested onsus picon-hat Is true and i Is adj
,t ~ y Wue in"' hs Went TO The store--t Is adj
hteuhd II Is aoinitted that Justice Osborne held him