The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-01-26

idsB Of any OF but whether 1t contains anything Ia
the to her general position and tho preprety
OF her o you consider II would be verydsnger
matter 10 imply the guilt Of adultery against woman
enerains theorec notions about soccis life and
ations which may APPRECIATION of your views
Then attack has been made her truth whc Of
the counsel had perfect right to do because
her affidavit contained some contradiction OF her
own declarations and acts Now, you must not be
deceived to the effect Of this, It Is not evidence
against her, and cannot be used to her doriment.
The Corsuelo letter was next referred to by tho
Judge. Th he said, paper found In her drawer,
wh;ob any my, %apiea Nv Mr ssbs n. ,bt Of
Mr. George Jameson. Having no direction the Judge
raid 1t might well be considered addressed to
established before It could be allowed in evidences
1t will be remembered that a long struggle took place
between the counsel both sides abb the admission
Of this letter, but IL finally admitted, Mrs. For
rest acknowledged it In her deposition In nentiDs
upon the changes as to adultery with the parties men
toned by Mr. Forests witnesses the Judge said bs
regarded the abandoned as to Richard Willis Capt
Calcraft and Samuel Marsden Raymond and that Jet
remains to be considered only as to N Willis, Capt
Howard, and George Jameson The testimony OF
the pemings rs TO their seeing hr Willis and
Mrs Forrest the piazza Of the house in Twenty
tecond street, he said should be weighed against
the testimony OF Mr Willis denying any such
ansao,,on, and # that evidence satishes you
that he has fas6sd the truth you must pay no attea
tion to what he has stated The testimony OF darvin
has been subject to much crosse xaminatcn; and You
will whether is to be relied upon with regard to
the transactions which he to have through
the window. There L. discrepancy in his AFFIDAVIT,
whom compared with his testimony on the stand which
you must observe, and say whether what he states
shall outweigh the testimony Of Mr.. Wills 30 also Ia
regard TO the evidence Of John Kent who depoaes to
having been sent by Mr. Willis to MSs Forrest, with
letter; to her coming to Mr. Wilss house, her going
up to the room which had been assigned her. to HI,
come out OF her room, and hearing him cay, Good
night dear" The first inquiry is whether MIR. Willis
was really at the door of Mia, Forests room And hers
you have two occasions testified TO- on which IL said
Mrs Forrest was seen by the witness at the house OF
M those But there IS sS o. Win N
reconcile them and determine what credit Is to attach TO
them. Now, you have testimony this point OF ost
imposing charecterthat OF Mira Willis who states that
on two occasions which Mrs Forrest there. she
there at her request note having been writ
ten and the witness sent with it. She further says tina.
Mrs Forrest her stav ed AL night and went
away next morning On the other occasion she she
| was very ILL., and that Mrs Forrest also came again
These the only occasions that have any resemblance
to that testified by the witness aud his statement when
compared with that Of Mrs Willis, exhibits di,nre
pancy. The Judge advertei to the testimony OF Anna
| Flowers in relation to Captain Howard and Mr.
| Forrest, and went over briefly the fact, tci.id ID
to by her in relation to her being at Nr For1e Dr
Lees Mr. Dickinson and the House Refrge AMI also
the testimony Of other witnes esimpugniug her vecacy
Some of the persons vine she did live tded fayorby
OF her veracty but the facts slnted by Catherine
! Levns In her testimony to her being found with
Barney Mcoabe still remained Tbs jury were accord
perred against her. Alludin2 ths publication Of the
notice in the HERALD about Anna Flowers asking her to
call at the oce of Mr. sedgT the Ju lga said that
as 1t well known to Mr. seigwck she In the city
| this enotce he mad no doubt, most unworthy
transaction designed to answer some evil purpose al
| defendant Yet ;f anv attorney nv cnmnsoI had
v,;ttsn Il 10 would Isv. aans' .ha, whi.% yarI,
have J.oraced and randarsd MIN ~arthv of tha 49,
G..son WIN ths ax;dsncs os ~, om;n haf,
ror ancomnan;na ~ snei ,4;ra 10 = -, 80
nnon II for ths e.tab,;shm.nt ~ IN, 60 j.; y,oti y
Oantan Howard an5Vr. Enrra,, =. = = ae,rma,r. r.,
The I,,a.. ar; ar.a y. ,h ,, 90 ~ an y I'm, .e ~ ~.
cnmetancs. ssfanair ~ onn ~ .n ~ no.sa.i & o
Mr.. Forrsst,s condret in ,;n - ghnh b ;J
der similar crcmm1ancs m thn ~ nb,t,a ,n
to the Jury
nr,,pr,.r,o. =, ,,,, 4,.,,
Tho inv rst,,ad a. a. ~ -, -. ~ - =, ,,, 49,.
r,rmt.s =, ,.S .h 10 ~. 80 W 49,. -. w y.
soms so ny -, rt ~ . "hS &
rsadv IN rec.; 70 th.m mt thau d,d not nor.r - - NO
H. untn tss ..,.ntr. ,,s,I g o'cleck vhen ~
The Clerk OF the Court called over their nams. and
then called the plaintiff and defendant Mr. Forre,
and his counsel were in court ana Mr. o,Conor an
for Srr Forrest who with her friends had ett At