Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1852-07-22
FRIDAY MORNING, JULY 10, 1859.
All the intelligence and pecency.

ISSUE Inc journal OF the lZtn nst, ueVoteS near TWO
columns in reply If anything definite, than the
well known principles of the Wing party, were neces.
sary to convince Of their of confidence in the
intelligence Of the people, the reckless disregard of his
tory manifested in that reply would suffice Falsehood
may consist of either the uttering Of untruth direct
s or Of language intended to convey afalse impression
The Journals reply abounds 10 both.
The Journal says that Washington was member Of
the first Federal party in the United States True. But
the Journal knew full well we referred to the Hartford
Federalsts. The FIRST Federal party ceased to exist
long before the Hartford Convention. Their object was
a CONFEDERATION of States under general government,
with certain powers defined and limited by national
constitution. This definitely accomplished, they become
merged in other political divisions The evident intent
est of the Journal article Is convey the impression
that the Federalisis of the days of Washington and
those the present day identical 10 principle This
transparent that DO not feel called upon to ex
pose it, When speak Of Federaists, in connection
with the Wing party, we to be understood as mean
Ing the disciples of the Hartford school. Dstrustng
the capacity Of the people to govern themselves they
desired strong government--a approximation
the British constitution. They forth their princi
pies In series of resolutions. The pill too bitter.
They gilded It, True to the instincts Of their neal
descendants the pesen, Wing party they appropriated
to themselves the popular name, Federalist But the
people learned discriminate between the genuine
and the counterfeit In consequence of the Hartford
Fcderalists burning bias lights signal the British
TO enable them to evade the embargo they
called in derision, "Bus Light Federalists To dis
tingui-h themselves from the masses and insignia Of
their superior intelligence the Hartford Federass
klcct coc[Gdoa Hanea Coolada
FeJeralsts" And when We use the term Federali.t In
partisan sense mean, unless otherwise explicitly
stated, the 'Bue Light Black Cockade Federalistsu
How do you like that name, Bro. Delrees3 We
are prepared to prove that the party to which you
now belong is nothing more than this Federal party
fused into Native Amercanism, and few other isms
depending entirely upon locality, and widely dssimar
in different latitudes.
The Blue Light Federaliss were In favor Of the su
premacy Of the fep over the mdns So are the Wings
of the present day. Take of the rich and they
will take care of the POOR is fundamental maxim of
each. They legisate for the exclusive benefit of cap
tai. Their national Baak and High Protective Tariffs
designed concentrate wealth in the hands Of few
Ia consummaiion which, if ever attained will ultimate
In the overthrow Of our free Institutions The "Blue
Lights" opposed the Of 1912 The Wings opposed
the recent with Mexico. Tom Corwin, leading
Wing u s. Senator from Ohio openly declared that the
Mexicans should welcome" brave soldiers with
bloody hands TO hospitabe graves" Greedy the
rous expectorator of the New York Tribune and his
"sneeze of the Journal, both Wings Of unquestioned
orthodoxy, denounced the war while it raging
Soma Democrats were, no doubt, originally Federasis
So many devout christians originally vile sinners
Conversion is the follower of repentance. Every day
Federalst repenis is converted and turns Demo.
Ii he brings forth fruit for repentance all
right. But it is not very remarkable that while those
Federasts, who have turned Democrats have acknow.
lodged their errors and asked eontrtely forgiveness
those who still adhere stsadasly the principles OF
Federalism jealous Wings. They couldn't be other.
wise. They bone Of their bone and flesh Of their
flesh" Mr. Webster, the great Whig expounder, open
y opposed the of 1919, and himself burned blue
lights. The New England Wings even now boldly pro-
claim their affinity Federalism. j. r. Ingersoll,
whom the Journal accuses Of Federalism, is bitter
Wing.
The Journal says that the election OF Mr.. Adams
gave great dissatisfaction to the friends OF the opposing
candidates. Messrs. Clay. Jackson, and Crawford, and
that hereupon coalition was formed" TO put down the
administration This "coalition" choose Gen. Jackson
their candidate and took the name Democrat, and
'sthen concocted lie" Mr. Clay whose friends ac.
cording the Journal. formed part of the coalition"
Ia the second specification Of is article the Journal
says tdat the Federal party opposed the war; and after.
wards changed their name to that of Democrat Now,
is not that nicei Was there anything persplcu
ous3 The Federal party apposed the deserving
Mr. Adams, also opposed to the war; forming "coai.
ton with the friends of Clay, Jackson and Crawford
and the 'hull on 'en" then 'concocting e' on Mr.
Clay their own friend! Gen. Jackson too who contrib
uted more than field ull Of such Generals as Scott to
bring that successful issue chosen the candidate
of the anti-war party! Ha! hal! hall Whggery out.
Winged! On with the soup! Let your mouths be
opened wide Defrees, by lucid syogism, proves Mr.
Clay Federaist, and Gen. Jackson his caaddate
Here are eistnct origins Of the Democratic party
given by the Journal. one only possibly be true
Which Is its We await response in dread suspense.
Does the Journal understand the Wing platform to re-
terate the advocated by the Wing party since
It's orgsnization3 Very well. The coalition" was
formed in opposition Mr.. Adams, you say. Was he
whigf The "old Man Eloquent" whose voice is
hushed in the stiffness of the grave openly avowed
himself a Federalist and Wing. Mr. Webster. an
acknowledged Federalist, was prominent Whg cand.
date in the recent convention at Baltimore Are the
Federal opinions Of these distinguished lights in Whg
gerry reteratedl Where are the Alien and sedition
Bank, Bankrupt, and High Protective proectsi Are
they eiterated7 They have been advocated by leading
Wings. The Journal, then, admits that these are all
reiterated Ia the platform. Good. So be IL.
The Journal says that one Of the chief differences
between the parties Is the policy ITO be pursued
toward foreigners" That's true. The whig party In
1919, were Ia favor Of servely covering before the