New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-01

seem 90 abrurd and rdicuicus when ps,
forth BY Csrcy. Corwin and 0reeley. e.,
equally absurd when quite as broadly stated
by Gen. Jackson:
WASHINGTON CIrr. April %, IsA
- . Heaven smiled uvoa and gave ~ Liberty II
ipdeprdepce 1sss same Prcsiissee hes el's.sias
vhh The means OF Nsuond inaepcods acs end ssn Dsa
defense. II omis or refuss 70 ace tas suts y tss
be hss extended TO "a 80 Deserve NOT hs sossaOatss
al Uls bl-ssirs He h.z flied Justaiss sad yzf
uI.ias 9th nnerss-wilh led, rOa, sod cs2,-r-aaa
alyen us climate and coll for tae grOw's Of hes, .sA
wool These being The great mate Tale VI na ioas Ga
fs,.e fk,v o-rkf % kd,s eiesd,d 70 ~ s1sssss -
,,ct,os tbst our manufacturers and hDOsrs msy %
pIsccd in isir com essri with moo q psrops I'd
ihst We have stain our country - g mae Las
tnx srd Important articles o. esseosA - ~
| will ask whst 10 the reel <uytcs o. DE ariss-
tur,,t Where has the American f-sme market ~
M, surplus prddcei Ex.eJs for cou D. ne q" mel hsr
a foreign nor e home market Doss not ths ssesrty
prove shen there Ia market AZ tous OF Aotpsd tat
ihere 70 too much labor employed 10 A<ric c,ra
mon sense AZ once p1lbts oat ere iemeiy. fsk rec
agriculture IN IiS u lied &af-s SIR AhH3'ea "'ssssd
ns-, ~ r-eu Gfd children, and bns VIZ az Ssoe sNs
narA'f for brseds,s, teSa 81 hh'eps s'r 4rse~
~ In ,korf sir, nsv8 been TOO lObs sIol q 70 n
Iolicy Of brlusa erehants IL 10 time "a "a sssA
bee n q 1.-The mora Ane'icsuked' and ihsssdd
fecc paupers add lsboIers infnssnd. fred pse osN
policy, Ne shsll be renceTed psupors OF rselvea
Ii H. therefore. my oplbioa tia, careful ss5 az
eious e. III 10 much ~-uted 10 psy nsgoesi aeos
ard 10 afford Us the means Of that deesse sNin our
selves, whish toe ,scty Of try and liberty
depends and ssf, though MT l~ss give yro9u dis
pioutl &c our labor, Witch must prOvs bsa 4 al 10
the hapl iness ndeps udence and wealth Of the
nify.
ANDasw JAcKsoa-
One word only on Kindred topic which
Mr.. Doheny seems not 10 understand.
Let us at least have clear definitions. Dir.
ID. says:
"In connection with this question u P,s,ec.oa An
srsume Mt IL advanced which 10 NJ ones ssll4ay ada
falfet odd Froc Trade 10 called Eas1sh. Nis 90 mNa
rfprnsch STR it 1. noS Eogish. IL Is sIalseuty ~
English. Il 10 anti Englsi.'
All this may be true in the sense MIR. ID.
contemplates, or it may be untrue, with
out touching the real question. When wc
speak of 'Brtish Free Trade we mean
that ,ckich Britain conmends 10 other ss-
tiors under tie name Of Free Trade
namely, the sending of their raw staples
to England, for sale and consumption, and
buying Of her the greater part Of tho man
ulactures they may need in return. THIS
is what we understand as British Free
Trade, and to this we are utterly opposed.
We believe 1t has esse ntially conduced %
the ruin of Portugal, of Ireland, and Of
India we believe Il has diminished tho
prosperity and crippled the growth of our
own country we believe it has Involved
ma in several Commercial ReyuIsions, and
is now preparing The way for another BY
accommodating against us n heavy Foreign
Debt. We believe that there Is true oco-
nomy in making at home the greater portion
of the Wares and Fabrics we now buy
from Europe-that our wants would b
more cbenply supplied while our Labor
would be more steadily employedrnd more
amply rewarded under this system than
ut present. All this belief Of ours may DO
ever so childish, foolish, narrow minded;
but the fact nevertheless remains that MI.
ID. has not understood, or has not fairly
met, our objection to British Free Trade.
nor our reasons for giving il that desis-
nation.
So also on the subject Of Internal In
proyement. Mr.. Dsheny stoutly denies,
and in the same breath admits, that his
party Is hostile to such Improvement
Hear him
Democracy 10 not oppossd to Improvement %
the contrary, il favors and vpholdsi H. Demosrsoyb
opposed 20 your putting POUR hands into the pccks,d
enc an and tsking our The price Of anew eossis
sno,her;that 10 the Only dootoe II holds far Mt
ADow. Is will not bcauty tho ty Of Chlisso at tbs
expense Of Charleston . The economists ask
for road opening into hs mining regions OF Psansy
vania. These regions are owned by somebody. sndf
say that when you make the road you servo the 1t
the Of others and this Is all you do IL 10 tai
n ga shilling from each Of four men, and giving hsns
dollar TO tho diIh
Surely, no clear MINI can fail to per-
ceiye that the spirit here eyinced Is one Of
deadly hostility TO the policy of River and
Hmbor Improvements by the Federal
Government or Canal-making by the
States. What Is the cavil! That these
Improvements benefit some individuals in
greater measure than others. Well, can
you make Canal any wtere, or improve
any HarbOr, without meeting this objec-
ton! Certainly not. The Erie Canal hos
been and ever will be blessing to millions,
but it has specially benefited the Thousands
who owned lands alorg its borders, par
ticularly at Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse.
&c. And so Of every Harbor that ever
was Or ever viii be improved. The growl
of the dog in the manger menaces all
alike. Every dollar spent on the Harbor
of Chicago tends to benefit property-hold-