Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1852-10-22

+, BRIEF NOTICE BY THE PRESENTING BISHOPS or Tur
ACTION OF TIE COURT ASSEMBLED FOR TIE TRIAL
The undersigned the 30th Of March last under crcum
stances which tie -hurcl the public la general are
IacGuand signed Prescnimen u the Right Rev. Bishop
| Dourc OF New Jersey.
This document contained charges, NOT merely, many
n.y lave supposed, OF reelessness cxrfs scc;
oiIry matters but az crimes aEd iEmurtes
oil, m" <alc which ini!snan'iy IioJairt ~ ell IN
right men,
.;r9 Bishop Tor The 2iA o JHUc.
Before ii ddy va rntnn, engaged coHnsc ir Bi.ho,
,n uapi.d though not IN tnat character IDr pus none
men, Of The rIi: declaring the behalf If Bishop Doaae
Ia liz wnEi! take no advantage q !c posponernen On
this representation without III" knowledge aud much against
the FISHES Of the undersigned rosponenrnt till the Nh
pi October granted by The lac venerable Pr, siding
| Bishop
Tie undersigned subsequently aPprised that seor.
doubts entertained BY several 81 tbs bishops, whether
this illegal II has been proved by the r..
ait mai the "'c ctioa would have teen fatal to ic Present.
ment.
oder ,ll.s founded apprehension The undersigned,
another p>cn!men called The I'D OF JUL, and
INCLUDING all thu 1T III" first with additional
soec!cei winch had been omitted either nccdcnay
,r from doubts OF availability nt IT." evidence The f
Present ut not formally Withdrawn; and The trial
The second was fixed also the 1h 81 October 10 both
instances the place appointed was Camden.
The Court assembled, rorsS'n. .. Bishops Hopkins
Smith kempcr McCnsky, DE iaHcc. Nottingham Lee
Johns Easburn Chase Potter CPioIi Green Ru,!cta-
The attendance six "tnc: R!ahoP- prevented sid.
their PERSONS their !amt 7d seven had btth
ready atcni II" lime first appointed: tut :yHHd in.
possible 20 make second l4Inry Three othors
ltscnt
On tie representa- Jh u Bishop Doane ina M,
ea! witnesses could ocfws: attend, ihe Court al
oufned On lie tz DAY rem Camden to burlington ne
place oi his residence.
Nicn The Cont neSt met an application ysi
'roma COMMITTEE ." TIE Convention Of tie Diocese OF New
Jersey permission: rc3 written representation
h,if .; .int Convention g., m nrily % one vote me
IJuH ganirt t.- implication; and Immediately after he
reading ~ the pSCsr offered by iIc nndtTSiShe which
The second, tia Committee wrf" admitted, and rra, al
lr-umr or itc Say II al rfihe: proceedings. lhn ID
r.c ground wa that between III" dates OF ne inst and
rond Prcscutmrris the Convention lid Insulated en- rGG
~ and satisfied III .r Innocence AMI integrity Of IL
Bishop THIS inquiry which vas c0ncn'td 0! seven lay
nI,n The II scr".!y hny OF TIE wiIresse.
IN evidence Pro entncn rested "Gd 81 none o.
hc most import at nht without cToss ANIMATION, Wa
cGni,scdy iIar:e pTactuirg II ""s without !'e1
force Or moral value md us The Committee hai no pcwt
% ry their had Q. hs weight OF an acGuittah
The Undersigned prosecuted written reply TO ihs "tcu
,nrnr Llu Documents before Tho public, sn "l he
oud also in The printed Journal OF the Court which win
speedily appear
CONSEQUENCE inquiry thrs naie ~ the Convention o.
Yew j,rsy B.. fore the al tn second preseincn the
caurl sluu! caa called 10 proceed further
gh charges witch had been made previously 10 nat IN
qiry; ami tiet The Convention had nccGri Srt! & IN
nir, jr, nny oltaT- Spoca! Convention had ttch
called yah reference h"sc which had been -gbsequn
| made these also shouG be dismissed
Against his action, ~. As against no admission ~
.nv Application from tdy unknown as Parry l. he 'l.
~. undersigned and argued WIN lfnesne,-
/
Bi..ep MAS repeatedly Ereut and urged "i, se!lNere
n.,n,c IN. thu -r"u gcr" 10 t!e pfr;"' u TIC CON.
mrre un,i dismiss The rrra,n''Hcn' "ith'"; mat
On the seventh iar ~ is the court came 10 'e
ri.ijr Ei.ht Ei.hD;s gas" IL opinions IN ilHot The
r-ou,,on ojrsniss tir gesent'nrn dni sN against r.
! The opniDi@ favor WEI" tlus %! Bishops h mpe
Slct'oskry D. Lancsy, Nh,rehnn;, Chase, l9'of Green
ana Ru'ictgc against It those oi Bishops Ho,h'ns
Smith. Lee Jotns, Eastbarn and Potter,
A. H.. ir4iy u IT," pUsifonemrrt hal bt,n Skinned BY
foyr nrcc Of me BISHOPS whose opIaoGs were ey,Hin
favor Of the smi--4! III" Undersigned n1w though ght
10 uii,r The first prcsenI.rn'. Thl- rejected.
Iit H. therefore that whl'e the chhr2rS, made IA
srict WIKI can"a- have been hisinzei y
Ia without The slightest consideration o. irr merits
they boon reini they have not been 'rI"i sud
! huy are Tu' rC!fac'tG.
ont !tvor o. i.ar and al their ability rely Nth
confidence on moral !r,n nn correct Nt1"mrn 81 n
church the approval ul Ghf cOnlnct Rae remaining
responsibility rests upon their brc'hrru
/ Nun.M tirAUE.
CHARLEs =. MclLvtiSE
GEORGE Burgess.
| rnlLAuElrn., oc!. II 1852.
| PENNSYLVANIA ELEcllON.-We publish the fs
recent election ~ this State t3 Judge "i TIE
upclr Csl and Canal Cunms si1nr su tar As received
They nir Gp from The official returns ant other r"Lt
Tie sources j. will br that tnc majority Tor Judge
WontwHl 20 ;ar is II eco and dat q! Mr iorSi1s
over Is COO The countries Bedford, Butler Clarion
Cear!irl! Elk Indiana, Junata Jefferson, Monroe Nc
kcuu. Sullivan TIu@a am! WyOmn@ set "a hear IRON
These coumrirs the sectiono 1851, gave moJ,n u
about ; 300 Governor hGirr they voted n tit same
way election TUESDAY last. and tie pr'tlh!Sl'
that III" rr,ue- ahty INCREASED ~, majority
in tl- Shi. wi ," coo pretty good tay5 work
! Tor rrnnsy wants Pennsylvania, oct. ~
INDIANA ELECTION
4 Cl.cl%Ha. Ocr Ia. Seventy i've counties hear! rom
gisc Wight Dem, lrr Governor, Is so Gh nit, wins:
democratic gain 81 the ol32, compared iin tie vote
( of 1919