New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-18
3 MRS. STOVES LETTER To NE.
RRuSsN;ICk fulay Jul

Rev. Mr. PARKER Dear Si-As your letter, addressed
TO my husband, is that better tam he
shall reply by stating you briefly all know OF
the matter under consideration.
then and do still, suppose 10 be- iar aud Just en
poston OF the whole state OF the received letter
reply from my brother IN which he stated that ne had
rousy amended altered resrd to express until
you were brought degree of unaniiny upon IT,
My brother then TO that he sand 70 you, Nc
Parker the wording OF this does not exactly please ms a1d
think you viii give liberty ~ draw up orIn IN pro-
duCe that will give satisfaction 10 both sides he went
say that he this form, which, Il was
willing to accede to it and adopt as my language,
copy with handwriting and send 10 the care OF MI
William Harnsd who would 10 It's insertion IN The Era
Tyitune ana Independent
Of the opinion at the time that the card had sent
Just and fair expose OF the slbect and should
have much preferred its publication But thought II YOU
willing this Adjustment ought 10 D.
willing also upon consideration came TO the colcu
the best expression which could Dc gwen
dignity which becomes Christian OF honor aud ex-
pressed what sincerely feel pleasure in repairing any uo'
INTENTIONAL injury which might hsye done you
Nothing could have been more surprising than the receipt
your letter You will perceive at once that the cis es
tone OF hs letter 10 me, considered himself To e Schs
with all Kindness fairness and good faith ds Ne d"iys s
Ist think be viii be equally surprised VITA nyss, -
ar that you DO not consider yourself to have asnt7d 70
those Letters.
When my brother returns which VIII be SON. you will
Probably discus. fairy with him whatever strikes you as
Objectionable in his part Of the proceedings.
tSsnedl iour very truly H. b. STOWE.
LETTER OF D J. BUTLER, Esq, To MI BEEcHER
1okA, luc-dAy, OtL , loO<-
DEAR SIR; understand from you that il Statement
YOU ale about make relation the correspondence
eenty pubshed the newspapers, having place
between Rev. DIR. Parker and Mrs Harriet Bcher Stowe
you nde to the interview had between you and uyse
ne leth Of June and say in respect of ITO tho card
M Butler objected wholly insufficient TO tho
podence be stated to me no particular provided
was satisfactory 10 Df Psrkeg' iou request say
wether The statement shove quoted conforms reco
,seEon Notwithstanding professional relations to DR.
fMktL conceive Io be duty TO tins question:
and thrre state IN reply thst goes
, connect.
But due to rry-l to sy tia; did drsaa of the
fobhcAon u the eorrrepoudeDce until should be rst uiy
a'.d TO- seitsd aud ssnr by tho RESPECTIVE, pHnes;
until afer d. Parker las part shoad have MA
the Opportunity Of cunsnlrS WIKI his counsel TINS
supposed he would uo, whe taxing
obis3, coad, thea cent VI Mrs Stowe sa.ch
wien my once, yon expTs ssed doubt have no
recoeeion that you told that DR. Parker wcah consut
the subject but nv exPeetstca that b would d.
the rrsat Of the relations Of chca and
stl existing between hiD aid myself; and therefore
rved tor DR. Psrkcrs private consultation with me,
opinion and tdvce 70 GEy question he might tt'nk II
ne eds propoec regard 10 TIE final terms Of the
core spoacepce.
VIII you do the favor 10 publish this sot- vita y0rs
state nentt sn, very respectfully,
Your vbcdIest ssrvant
BIZ BgrLES
Rev Hrxsy Wud n-rSh-. BroukyR