New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-10-22
TRlru FOR IRIsuHEN.

Tie Lrish Aacric0R, which PROCESSES neutral
ity rs between the two great parties, is now
lending itself completely % the uses Of the
Slam Democracy. In other words, it is selling
out it's readers to the support Of PIERCE and
KnG, and the Editor viii claim office or jobs
Tor himself or Lis nominees as a reward for his
service in case PIERCE is elected. So much
lcr his false professions of Independence.
lie tries 10 excite prejudice among lrishmen
against the Wings aud Gen. ScoGr because
WV l.. RoGIssoN is not now a Wing nominee
for Congress, as he ought 10 have been, and
lcoaid have been but for an Irish Delegate in
the WHO Nominating Convention who went
against him When Mr.. RoBSsoS did hold an
Office under The Wing National Administration,
he was constantly reyiled and his counsel 10 his
countynen dccried by those whom The Irish
Amcric0n is now serving, because he held Office.
He might haze continued TO hold il so long az
die Wings shall be in power, ii ho had not
chosen 10 resign il so that he might give his
whole time and energies 70 the canvass for
Gen Scorr. Had he chosen TO solicit a nomi-
nation for Congress, as most men do who re-
cciyc nominations he would haze been the reg
ulor Wing candidate for Congress in his Dis
tIict. But he worked for the cause, while
Others worked for themselves, and with the
usual result. Ii the Wing voters Of the Dis.
s-ict we're to-day 10 indicate their several pref.
ereuces be would be declared their Candidate
by an Overwhelming majority. But never mind
Tie Aish american knows that as many
lri.lmcn are nominated for or appointed to Of.
fee IN tie Wig side a. on the other, in rro-
portion 10 the number usually attached to the
respective parties. YET it meanlg seeks to gain
Irish votes for PIERcr aud KNe because fewer
are nominated BY party which ms usually re-
ceiSed but fraction of the Irish vote thau by
ore ghich hes for years owed ell IT'S power 10
the great mass ol that vote
The Hish AnerioqR lends it, Editorial cd.
umns to an attack on TIE T.i5aae, Waer,oftie
following IS air specimen:
"Ihs TribHps the inpar-on. 'ion o. Protection
lf undo ads Che uueton l. ris.f. "a k,,,v i,
working IA effect a. home ard abroad l. elovs-.si B,
CoLtrtr 10 tie i-rt iEtU canon 81 the Whigc-c.t l.
does tn' ccguiZ~rt Of i;s uf- ursscocnfzsnf OF ~
ily. and cOgLz 1t Of Ire unrr t. i & nos y~ doc
t-ue, e-cspt - bogus Il l. tie - .c1.sor OF t a.
Nsss sld the horror Of hsir Administered IN Tho arr
nJ7 four years IL cce OF near r. ard Lhev n.ve i-r
arcct III for tn Ilod ica,ion Il the TcriF Tnev
would mt dare 70 70 co. lee. IL may be srcor-rd nc
IN about = s d cau,--hcsr scJioR on L The t7-h
TO these grossly untrue assertions. We On.
rose the following undeniable facts:
l. The only Congress (tho XXVIIth) Wbic
in both branches which We have had in more
than twenty years framed and passed Gin 1st2)
an unequiyocally Protective Tsrih-the ONLY
one that has been passed since Is23-a Tariff
which, in cur humble Judgment, was more bene.
fetal TO the country, and especially to its Free
Lsborers, than all the acts passed since that
time.
,. That Tariff was repealed (in Isi6) By the
first succeeding Congress that was Democratic
IN both branches, and the present syowedls
Free Trade Tariff enacted in its stead-uesrly