The Democratic sentinel and Harrison County farmer. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 1851-1852, 1852-07-28

paper SO, lhaI nc raises 4 hO"II SeIS Hlau'
and commences abusing a private citizen of
Cadiz in the same article. Isn'the spunky?
He ought to spit upon it, provided he feels
in the splitting humor just now.
No. is headed, "The Wing Resolutions.
They are obliged to us for publishing the
resolutions Of their convention. You are
welcome, gentlemen, to all the good we done
you by SO doing. We did not object to the
9Th resolution as adopted by that convention.
so far as the resolution itself is concerned,
but to show the inconsistency Of publishing
such language, while at the same time they
uphold Gen. Scott, and the 9th resolution OF
:he whig platform. If it will be any salts
faction to ye, Richard, We will just tell you,
that the democracy of this county stand
where they have always stood, and their
principles every one knows who has been in
the county for the last twelve months. Don't
trouble yourself, Richard, about the democ-
racy of this county; they know their own bu-
slness, and they will attend to it.
No. talks about some person who goes
by the name of Judge Mcfarland" What
a Judge! What we said about his honor in
a former number of our paper we know to
be true; and whenever his honor replies to
us over his own signature, and he produces
an affidavit that he wrote it himself, and
that his reply has not been rewritten, alter
ed, or corrected by any person, save himself,
and that the language in his reply was not
dictated to him by any person whatever,
then we will attend to his case, and prove
what we have said 10 be true, and not be-
fore. We are thus particular, because we
dislike the idea of replying to some one else
over another mans signature, as We had to
10 last spring in the case of one Marshall
Mccall five have to reply to the son we
will do it, but we dislike the idea of reply
) ing to the father and son over the same sig
nature.
Ne, is something about an arti lie we
copied from the Chicago Tribune, stating
that Senator Chase intended to support Pierce
) and King. We gave our authority and
thought at tie time that it was correct, but
have found out since that the Tribune as
well as us were mistaken. That's ALL
No. 5 is about Hon. W. f. Hunter not in
tending to vote for Scott. The editor of the
Republican does not know that he will vote
for Scot, but ehopes he will, and he thought
it would be we'll enough to deny what the
Sentinel said about it, We want YOU to
prove, Richard, that he will vote for Scott.
We say he will not.
No. ISLANDERS gentlemen of this place,
in friend Hatton's usual style of doing such
things. Richard is attended to in commu-
nication which will be found in another col
umn.
No. I is about an article that appeared in
the Sentinel some three or four weeks since,
about Gen. Scott writing letter on Sunday
June Goth, to Gov. Jones for him to read to
the whig national convention. The dispatch
we copied from the State Journal was no
error, as friend IIatton says, buttrue. We
will admit that he sent another dispatch on
, Monday, after he was nominated. There
is considerable difference, Richard, between
being a candidate and being the nominee.
No. is about the Hon. w. +. Hunter
again. Rcha. d says he has eycrbeen at his
post representing the whig and free soil SEN
timent of this district. We know that Mr..
Hunter has been home on several different
occasions, during the sessions of Congress
that he has been a member of. And we
) have always thought he forgot those demo-
Gratis that were foolish enough to help 10 e.
lect him.
!, We will say in conclusion to our friend
: Hatton, that we copy just such articles rs
: we please, without being directed by him Or
: any of his clan, And any article that ap-
!. pears in the Sentinel you are welcome to
S copy or extract from, you think it will be
? lof any ADVANTAGE TO Won or your marty