New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-12-11
ENGLAND.

If any doubt existed after Mr.. Disraelis mo-
ton that the Derby Government would throw Protec-
ton overheard it set at by Lord Derby in the
House of Lords the 22d inst In TO question
from Lord Clanrcarde, Lord Derby stated that "the
object OF calling session Of the House prior to Christ
10 close for the controversy with regard
TO Protection and Free Trade The result of the late
election had convpced him that though large number
Of constituencies well disposed TO support the
Government they determined not TO assent 20 an
alteration in the recently adopted commercial policy,
and that any such attempt would be instantly negatved
by large majority Under these circumstance he had
felt 1t his duty to advise her Majesty 10 declare that the
principle OF unrestricted competition ought to be
After making this explicit statement Government
might have rested but il went further and announced
its budget for early day. from the details OF which
the country would be enabled judge of the sincerity
of the Government and the wisdom OF its policy.
Cheers. An attempt has been made In the lower
House to anticipate discussion by resolution to which
no member Of the Government can agree; but II would
be well if those who were about TO support the motion,
would consider not so much how TO overthrow tho
Government, but how il could form an Administration
after it overthrown." Cheers
On Tuesday evening Mr.. Villier's motion was
opprobrously referred by tho Earl OF Derby In the
Lords while in the Commons il was in debate Mr.
Viers declared he had brought forward his motion for
the purpose of placing record an unnstakabe de-
clarhton on the subject of Free Trade that men OF
business and the world might comprehend the maj de-
cison of England on this alimpsrtant question.
Mr. Disraeh in moving his amendment ingeniousiy
persisted in resolving Mr.. Viherss motion into an IN
quTy whether the Government had fuhed its pieuges
since il came into power. Following out this view ne
maintained that the Derby Administration was OF neces
si,y one OF compromise and Cancellation. ONCE was
thrust upon them when the former cabinet iei 10 pieces
from internal dscord, and they acceded 10 power by
| no motion connected with protection; consequently
they violated pledge by retaining Office with House
opposed to protection; and further, from the beginning
they never did intend TO repeal any OF the measures
| Of the tree trade acts.
MIR. Bright replied at length, in a speech
chiefly noticeable for the following passage
at the House maintained Mr. Vllier's motion, the
! United States where Free Trade President had Just
been returned by overwhelming majority, would also
know it, Hear IN the United states, Protection was
In the same helpless condition It was in this country,
and though well beaten the supporters OF that cause
still cling by in this country Laughter ana cheerr
But when President Pierce, in March next comes mo
power they might look forward to the RECIPROCITY Just
now much talked about there Therefore lei then pun
on the books Of the House resolution that nooouy
| could mistake" ~
Lord Palmerston skilfully smoothed over the
aperes OF both speeches and suggested, but ND not
| formally submit, some verbal amendments
The debate was then adjourned
Next day il was resumed by Sir James Ora
bsn, Mr. Gladstone Golden and others ana resulted IN
the withdrawal Of Mr.. Disraelrs amendment ana the
Offering Of the following by LORD faneis,on a5,iio
the opinion of this House that the improved condlaon
of the country and especially of the industrious
is mainly the result OF the recent legislation Nlicn na'
established the principle OF unrestricted eonpel'os,
snd ba abolished the taxes imposed for the purpose oil
-o,c,ion That il is the opinion OF this House that
! his policy followed maintained, and prGdeniy eA
tended win best enable the industry " the cohhtiy 20
bear its burdens and thereby Sssuredy pf9 s ,rs
,rcltare and con.entmeni Of the people. Ihst thls
Hopses ready to take into consideration any
consistent with these principle, which, Id pur ~
| Her Msjestys speech made oeiOre tnsin iii''
by her Msjes;ys Ministers. -, ,,,.;I r.;
The debate was further adjourned uhti I IL
day. when after another heightened aeoale, ahn ~
foTr1a division the House again divided ON lho
ment of Lord Pahmerston, when the nui,9eis ". ~
| For the amendment 46s against If, 81 Majority io'
the amendment, 4l5.
| The House then adjourned.
In the House of Lords. on the 2oth, III rePy
70 Lord Wharnchffe, the Earl of hslmesoury sta,sut
with reference TO the North American hsheres taal NJ
Webster's letter neither from the Go'etniss
placing new construction upon the Treasury oEuul
regulating the fisheries from the use OF nprope,
language in the negotiation. He did not know WhA'
Was the cause Of the letter being written unless 10
suited from circumstances which occurred 10 the AMER
car Government AZ the time Of the Presidential election
He must refuse produce the papers, IN the prsseH
peculiar state OF the negotiston but ne assured w
House that the friendly spirit prevailed between me
two Governments With the exception OF that one icy
FER everything tended most satisfactory concuS1oh
lie would produce the papers as soon as Po''oe'
StrnnC OPPOSITION is making by the shipping
interest against the grant Of charter 70 ths ne"
I;YeyrooI and London Trans Atlantic screw steam
! Din Comnapv A deputation from .shieids' sun
derlsnd Liverpool Glasgow. Leith sna otnsr pSSi Or
have demonstrated with the Board OF iTats ~ Y
ufs,ion comprised thirteen members u sh;n,sv &
with Others; aniOng them Aees's' D-N
| Co and Mr. Cunard. =.
In the suit brought against the steamship
Arctic for coming in collision with the sean''ug MOS
damages 10 the extent Of 1850, had DeeA a"a'"e"
against the Arctic.
Richard Brougham Bingham, late Secretary
10 The Lesston a. Naples. is appointed BRUSH |''A