The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-07-10

denied. bsssu:s u. s.t haA bees.s ysss:S e nsss.s
- 4: -: ::Ss
q scsordinst che terra; .nd rsqursn'as' Of
s To s :ss :';
ssy isnsssS S.y Ssss. SAID psa:.
Ss .sd ses. nc Committee had sissrssa
had to sRs !, e Il
snd that aithoush The oAsr.a. q
and the prs.mSs and resoutons were carried threush
.d the facts collected or aeisersons BY said coma
thus appears that if the eomns.se had been afforded
have the ia The eyosnb
up ,s. which b, the rssolntisn are based:
Without any or s int ts'
ass ssys sas
the same, before had reached my once.
sherman and others to railroad Through
Hudson % Ea s q %
FIFTY fret street. the road to be continued the
Common Council and and fast said avenue is
Before the permission to take effect tho grantees
due execution Of the WORK RE Contract was mads and
contained provisions intended to b hshy beneficial
The grant also made with the provso that the road
to within ore ysar and rom
street TO Harlem river within three years from ths pAs
Tbs resolutions passed the fourth day Of Juns A.
Of september follow ing w NY ~
the contract was executed, It before
ana requiring that ;hov. se days
execute it, should &c deemed 70 hays waived and forfeited
seh peImsOn and that 1.-THE said permission should tax,
The original resolutions provided that I'll. Common
S an sheTa a he, ssqs s s BE- aasa
That in the event the recurring the
Corporation Of the cost Of the road Will. fsa per cent
What have thus stated appears from the records in
the ofh &c Of the Clerk Of the Common Goancil.
between
t. Tine @ Va M
and one of the present Common c0uncto ascertain vhe
grantees wise compiled With as q iaure to the
Esithsr ever Rsdsa repos. on .hesat-
ee although they were respectively ATTENDED BY the dis
discussed so%Mtsss ''c ''4s''aA'
Pstsrev t and associate, q aveaas
Rsrosd CGmPny than months since
fs5 for the purposes Of tho grant ha. they
which would be required to operate said rail-
S and about to with
months last the actual IF the
% Ss city sHs that
% III ne 3 mt t. tie
Of the road and actual and
dsIsT shss .hs
s SsSas
this this too s Sr he Of giving the sssn. s.xTd parties
neoton with the railroad have Tat can dis
have m so % sp ss vssse NIGHTS s @
The ground of forfeiture alleged Was tina. til. company
had not been Srsanizsd and the road commenced, within
Ss'z sf' as
.hTs month, from the eseeutisn unx
concluded as matter of fact and Law that forfeiture lad
mr. pszis: q The wen
IN the
matter and report which be communicated to tho Board
VA sd %sst 'RPstSSsa
aouS &c %
insist on forfeiture q the grantees actually
time and mode which tic grantees should oreshss was
ts sy O. MI sSs s S
full construction Of the work.
G gIsntSss only The only ssc . 10 seg,Tasd
duty oonpetion the road hat tho pubic might
sh new and s9nyeniep, heroue.srs il tie city and
ma1ner should have been aud should be- the only aim
for e eSe
snS iSIt q new set Of men t. pys them q @
cep measure rendered absolutely necessary for The
On the contrary perceive that large portion II the
nv ss'f Is'p
are placed on the streets. 70 be used in the work the
progress through Canal street and for some di.anS.
d asa sty .ssst
furnished to the eyes public that active risorous
nit SOONER tie oGtructioSs netesssly caused ~
ia SP ss hs T
Of our citizens the better interests
cn prevent that advantars must te deSiored nnsss
nded on some clear ard plainly established ressos Of
What are the assigned the preamble the
IrsThat the original grantees have been guilty Of such
to ras siassSa 10 sSfn 70
fy brst street, within the time prescribed by tho tcsou
the public the reservation
who arc able and willing to eonstrset Tie read
tst tho tatemen is true, but dating ear from
ssgtion Of the contract am decidedly sfeyIiep
ars street by the period deegastcd and the means SC
grant ana nov N sstual progress promise
Bat erwise then viewing the cause
assfned am utterly unable TO see how the public inter
| in the resolution Of June last.
Keeping in mind always that shoud look alone 70
IG'a sTsa Ave sfy sss.
one year from the passage q the new resolutions
gain !y sS Change me public ysod sip!ssy Ss
5s only Se an M arSrs4yp With
and 5cstowel q ggcq others mere rsEsi.ty
S,se pgse sensf bs
grant even if some delay has occurred ivs another BY
And fncereiy hope tiat your reflections may
Of tt result because wen satisfied that
constituency consider the completion Of the road R6aey
more important than the interest Of nd
yiauas who may lie struggling for the emolrments Of
making the road and there ground for dispute be-
tween any Of the original grantees in respect
orgauation, other questions likely prevent the
actual construction Of the road the rbur ais Of Justice
best adapted to the ascertainment aud determination Of
f9Sat dn nS PsftG sass hi
sion the original documents which he claims hold on
cally return certified copy, desiring to vii hhod up
prevail thereupon, and protesting against the action Of
AIdtrnsa Compton, in signing them, iegal and
| thsrized a. G. KIN GSLkSD, Mayor.
On motion, the conmu niesti0n accepted on SIC
o9utrna 70 lie entered lcnC. the minutes
Led in of the public newspapers ard priItod
| IN pamPhiet FORM IT beCLkNACDAS, Deputy Clerk.
| Nrw YoHK. July q 1862.
lI1hA HoNoRhsLE THE BOARD OF ASSISTANT ALDERMEN.
ms communication and petition Of Richard r.
1esigent " TIC Board OF Aldermen. respectfully staos
Ahst your petitioner has printed In the
Communication from bis honor the Mayor protesting 10
turr certified copy Of the resolutions tho Common
onnc granting the privilege Of contracting the LighLh
haroai 70 Gusttyus A. ConoFsr snd others, ia