The southern press. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1850-1852, 1852-02-21

stsong) was maschina pAst. Tho edScer i'd
command saw the insulting demonstration, halt
ca his party, placed The peasant against Nh adj
joining wall, and then dsiiling his men in single
file, ordered them to apt in the mans face rs
they marched past
BAvARIA.-In . late sitting Of the second
chamber at Munich, NJ. Won IassauIx, in eiyinp
his vote for the military estimates, stated he did
| 80 the more readily, as the States of Germany
must be prepared for all eventualitiss, since the
| political power in France had been seized by
buccaneer (yflibustier.) The French minister
made a formal remonstrance to the President of
the ministry, N. Won der Pfordten, sgainst the
use Of such an expression by deputy Of the
chambers in reference to the chief of the French
government In the sitting Of the "a ID, NJ. Won
der Pfordten expressed his regret that M. Won
Lassauix should have used 30 injurious term.
Had no heard it, he should have requested that
the honorable deputy be called to order The
president Of the chamber also stated that he had
not heard the word-a declaration which the
chamber received with considerable "hiarity."
NJ Won Lassaulx did not withdraw the exlres-
sion. A bill is to be introduced withdrawing
the trial Of political offences from juries II i
to have retroactive effect.
France.
The testamentary executors Of LOUIS PHu.-
LIpE have addressed u protest to LOUIS BONA.
rARTE, against the sequesration of the property
of the Orleans family, in the frst paragraph OF
which, they say:
The testamentary ex, cutOrs Of the late King
Louis PHILIPPE, deem it their imperative duty to
protest against the decree Of the Odd of jam
AIRY, 1852, relative to the property of the house
OF Orleans That decree overturns from ton 10
bottom, not only the testaments which they were
til 10. - H. Al
tracts which have regulated and fixed the posi-
ton and the rights Of the varous members of
that august house. They come forward, there
fore. apart from all political prepossessions, to
appeal to the justice of the Prince President Of
the French republic and to point out the errors
in law on which the second decree entirely rests
Unless these errors are recognised and corrected.
they will inHict blow the most serious upon
the sacred rights Of the property of that family"
The protest goes on to examine and contest
the legal doctrines alleged in Justification of the
sequestratcn of the Orleans property, and hav-
ing done this, concludes with the following ex
posture of what it terms the great errors of fact
in the decree of the 22d Of January:
According to the decrees the family of Or
leans would possess 300O0O,CO0f of immoya-
bic property in France, and division being made
of the property of the donation more than 100.
000,000f. would remain to them. These figures
could not have been furnished but by persons
absolute strangers to the affairs of the family Of
Orleans.
The testnmentary executors of the late King
Louis Philippe, whose mission it was to inquire
thoroughly into the whole matter, are in a stu
alton to affirm that both the statements are
completely erroneous. Moreover, they attest
that the execution of the decree of January %.
1852, would almost be the complete ruin of the
heirs of the late King Louis Philippe. They
hope, then that they shall not have made vain
appeal to the justice and fair dealing of the
Prince President of the republic.
(Signed) "DUpIN.
"Duc de MONTMORENCY.
"Count de MONTALIVET.
"ESPLAGNE-BAR
SCRIBE.
"Paris JAM o."