New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1852-08-19

NAV have been risht-thst, by the iniuence OF
all that was unknown, in respect To the Hun
garian cnestion, they might be able tue easier
to make vibrate the benum0ed strings OF tue
English population, but little sympathz,ng win
apv 6,reign question. Thus, as often happens,
thev used the thought truly Expressed oy
Tacitus: Quod iynotKm pro maga!heo em. Inc
HUNGARIAN question was but a catchword IN DC.
half of their exposed popularity. IL was, az i
think have already said, maneuver OF reI,eaV
on the part Of English Professionalism, Liberalism
and Radicalism, ashamed OF having sa'd o,
done nothing in the revolution OF 1913 IN behah Oh
their own principles and brethren. -,
"Is the faith which does not act a sincere one
saws Racine. | am far from believing aud aifIm-
Ing that Mr. Golden and his friends, some fine day
resolutely and syst-matically took seats around
table and there decided that, to mask their blun-
ders .hey should organize a political comedy,
which would serve at least deludIng purpose.
The tardy instinct OF preserving their own popu-
lasity prompted them, without perhaps being con-
scious of the true spirit OF their acts. But such
is the truth at the bottom, as every sensible man
must and will see.
Even now, when the presence OF kossuth IN
Z London has brought them nearer to action. the
speech makers have disappeared in part and there
is not even one Of them left to share in the
Concersaztone of MaZzini.
ConpeTsdzioRe COnrerSGzi0Re! Such will be
the answer of English Professionalism, Liberalism
and Radicalism to the energetic appeal for action
addressed TO them by Alazzini. Socialism alone
can respond to il, but Socialism is like the mon
ster Of the tragedy.
'The which bears il shrinks back aarishted."
Socialism is an unrbe fruit of Professionalism,
Liberalism and Radicalism. they shrink before
the logic Of their own principle. They refuse to
acknowledge their child, and others will perhaps
adopt him. But at any rate, the child must SUBJ
NIT TO educate himself, and not reckon upon the
friendship he favored with before his birth.
His friends have become enemies, peTceiving they
have made him greater aDd stronger than them
selves. Socialism isthe watch.woId of the Eu
Topean revolution of 1919. Neither Mazzni nor
kossuth, nor Ledru Rollin can helpt. 1t is tor
them the coat of Nessus.
That the introduction Of this new principle in
the affairs Of the world has unsettled all other
combinations. cannot deny. But il is an irresst-
ible fact and the RevolutOnists can win nothing
by lodging it they sh0nd submit, and not
treat it as the old General Melas did Napoleohs
victories when he affirmed that he did not hight
according to the rules.
Professionalism, Liberalism and Rsdlcah5m are
dead eren in ERgidnd, by the triumph OF the aD-
soutist reiction throughout Europe. Inc reVO-
luton bresthes only in Socialism; the consequent
Revolutionists are only those who signed the an
swer of the French Socialists to Mazznl. But
does the future belong to them. that is TO say, to
the revolutionary Socialists This is what nave
to discuss now with those who signed the anti
Mazzinian manifesto. As to the Revolutlomsts
called pnTc, they now stricken from the stage
Of the world. They eau reappear only TO engeh-
der, by some temeTity OF speech upon the
efficacy of GCfiOn, obstacles TO the ascending
movement Of the creative idea.
JULES LECHEyALIER.