The daily union., 1852-10-28
The Trucking Of the Administration to the
Cuban Authorities.-rhe Ease uses OF an Or

u
gan.
We have come to the conclusion that the Republic
newspaper in whose hands we know not or its respon
sibe editor has been for several weeks detained in New
York by llness) is availng itself Of its position
The recognised organ OF Mr. Fmore's administration 10
put forth Statements if by authority, in relation to the
policy of the administration, which either destitute of
truth else coored to produce totally false i'm
preston, designed inure the benefit OF the Scott fac
ton OF the whg party In resorting TO such tricks the
Republic has exhibited form and degree of political
which is, so far we know, entirely unprece
denied in any Washington journal which has heretofore
been regarded speaking the sen,mentso of any admin
istration In other that we have ever heard OF
has any "organ" undertaken, il "by authority" to
attribute line OF policy TO the administration for which
il speaks which that administration at the very
moment plainly repudiaes and has not the courage TO
adopt or propose. We hold this unprecedented and
scandaous of The especial organ" up to the peo
pie the very climax of this whole "eanuass of frauds"
We desire the country TO mark the fact that has been
adopted simultaneously with Mr. Flmore's lecan,atlon
OF his Union policy and his unqualified surrender to the
Scott and Seward wing OF The whg party
Two or three days ago. two members OF the Demo-
cratic Central Committee, after the fullest inquiry and
upon the direct and reliable information, elegraphed
over their own signatures TO New Orleans the following
precise and clear statement OF the action of the admins
,raon in regard 10 the difficulty OF the steamer
Crescent City at Havana; showing plainly that the ad
minstraon, pursuance of IFS accustomed policy, has
backed Of its controversy with the Cuban authorities,
and conceded all that the nsoence OF Captain General Ca
nedo has dared demand, by taking 10 pre-
vent both the obnoxious ship and the obnoxious purser
who belongs 10 it from entering the port OF Havana:
Hos EMILE l.. SeRs; Lieutenant Porter has been
summoned Washington to explain his conduct at la-
Havana The s s es Gssssn G s gss. being sub
uied. This yields the point Smith, and is regarded
a backing OF government The charge
made In the Union of yesterday and denied by the In
telgencer or Republic of to-day
"a. O. PENN,
"JoHN w FoRNEY."
We affirm that every word OF the above statement OF
matter OF fact is strictly The yieding of the point
as TO Smith,. and "be backing out OF government"
stated matters Of inference and the inference is OBJ
viousIy irresistible. The entire statement so far as
goes is as perfectly accurate any statement can be-
We say, so far as it goes for affirm and will
prove, that the administration has backed out more CON-
pletey and more humbly, than is alleged in The
above cautiously worded despatch
The following statement Of the policy of the govern.
ment appeared in the New York Herald Of the 23d inst
and reached hi, city on the evening OF that day
Especial Correspondence OF York Herald
WASHINGTON, October %. 1852.
II Is understood that the government views the in
this light that have right to force Cuba admit
Mr. Smith Shore when their refusal to do Is evidently
founded the belief. wronginly rghuly that Il j.
necessary FOR the public prace ol the sand that all
peced persons should be excluded, and that Mr. Smith is
looked upon a disturbeT.
Lieutenant Pouer addressed the captain general as an
officer OF the United States navy, and government
ders itself directly called upon either endorse the
position he has taken or dtsavow Il
So long 8 peace with Span, IL IL contended
i is perfectly ridiculous TO pretend have right force
admit citizens II che thinks III 10 suspect they
hostile to her and places her refusal that ground
Whilst State OF the Union claims the right, and erer
,ises H. Of mprisonDg citizens Of other countries for fear
hey might d.iurb the public peace, government II is
argued hardly find fault with Spaa for simply refusing
o let suspected persons land on her shore.
This, understand from ample authority u the ground
AIKEN by the government whether IL Is in keeping with
public opinion remains to be
Lieutenant Porter has been for 10 be informed OF
hese We've and he will be expected govern himself
ordingly.
On its face this statement claims 10 be made on au.
hory" II is clear and precise in IFS terms II relates
o subject which the public mind greatly er-
ed when it appeared II purpors to state. in a con.
'OhSeN wow W kuNtiHineHt aS w
ase II that Lieutenant Porter had been sent for
be informed OF that view and that he sent for
md informed, is well known And OF this statement
comprehensive, minute, and important and protesting
rest upon sample authority, that neither OF
he whg organs in this city dared say one tcord Ia am
rddicfion Of if dnoer less cautious and less accurate
statement The subject appearing in the Herald two
sys before over diferen signature, and apparently
different source, promptly eonradicted by the
Vdtiorai Inteuigsncr Bat than this On The 25lh
nst the National TnteRigeneer repubsbed from New
FORK journal, with strong editorial approval exhibit.
ng due respect for International rights" elaborate
icle in defence OF the very policy attributed TO the ad
IN the above despatch, and illustrating that
olicy by the very reference the laws OF OF
he States Of this Union the admission OF free col
,ted persons into it's ports
Upon these facts, and upon other inconesable evil
ences within our knowledge, aver that on the 22d
Instant the policy OF the administration in this case was
he policy described in The above despatch under that
ate We entertain shadow Of doubt that upon that
lay, or the day following, that policy communca.
ed to Lieutenant Porter for his guidance We defy any
member Of the administration from the President down.
deny that the 22d the policy Of the govern
nent was that above described We aver that II is on