The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-01-01


Of his country" The extract commenced with the
words" The great rule Of conduct s to have little
political connection a possible With foreign nations
Mr. Campbell desired to know whether his colleague de-
signed to advocate the doctrine Of Intervention
planned by Kossuth In his various speeches?
The time to which the debate was limited now expired
The CHArsMAN having made decision on point pre-
sented appeal was taken from his decision.
quorum-the opponents Of the Kossuth resolution
fusing to vote; and much time was consumed In oang
The resolution being (ssvsn oclsck fairly before
Mr. CHuncHLL (dem.), Of Tenn, offered provso to
does not depart from its long doctrine
Intervention and does not endorse the doctrine OF
suth-f by that doctrine he meant direct
with foreign powers. He said that when have OK.
tended the hand Of friendship to brother who has
been long absent, and give him hearty welcome, he
ought not to expect any thing more
Mr.. B.ssrLL (dsm OF H.. could not vots tor ths
amendment. Itwas too indefinite Hsinteniei Co vots
fer the resolution nddesIed the declaration
with his vote that he meant to do nothing enan
extend an act OF courtss- tea distinguished iniviiua
He believed in the right this government act pre-
cisey as Kossuth assumed to desire He wiling
when the time arrives to make 1t that 60
vernment should make the declaration viii Oh Kossuth
suggests; but that time has not come
Mr.. HARRIS (dem OF Tenn proposed. as a substitute
for the amendment If his colleague Mr. Churc 1ilL
follows =" and that said committee inform Kos
suth that the etted policy OF this government rie
chip with ell nations and entangng aiau,ss
nops.' Be said- the object,f the House
dOree kocsuths principles. they would vote down hi
amendment To ths last extremity would hs re,ii
every attempt to commit the government to prin,pls
contrary to those which have beeE cherished from tn
earliest period Of our history up to the present hour
MIR. CARTIER protested against intervention o.1 .
coupled with the resolution
The amendment Of Mr.. Harris was adopted, and then
In connection with another amendment, rejected,
One gentleman was Ia favor Of including the exled
associates of Kossuth In the resolution He was for
specting the knapsacks well as the epaulettes.
Mr. NApoRs (dem.) Of Miss, warmly advocated the
resolution.
Mr. DEAN (dem y Of N. Y, spoke of tho miserable
arrangements attending Kossuths reception at the
in this city and Of the influences At work outside the
House to defeat the resolu,ion and said he would vote
for the resolution because he instructed to do
Mr.. WILLIAMS opposed intervention, and predicted that
this would be element in the next Presidential elec
Mr.. BAYLY, (dem of Va, offered an amendment
which was rejected shat nothing in the resolution
shall be construed expressvs of design to involve
ourselves in enangng alliances with European powers
and he enforced this in strong language
Mr.. swEETzER, (dem of Ohio, advocated Intervention
giles. He said hundred Thousand people of Ohio
prepared to act up to this
MIR BrANToN, (dem of Tenn, was for the resolution
but against any expression of opinion Two miiors of
armed men in Europe now hold in check three hundred
millions Of people, and the time may when can
and will Assist in securing liberty to the oppressed
Mr. VEsAslE (dem of g., dissented from the doc.
triDe advanced by Messrs Bsse and Stanton aad said
that such interference would involve our country in
Mr. TAYLOR whg) of Ohio opposed the resolution and
for adheriDg to the old established policy Of Wash
lngIou
Mr. GlpDIScs, (free soil) of Ohio, exposed what he
called the Inconsistencies Messrs Taylor venabs,
and Bsyly who voted for resolution pathizng
with the down-t trodden people of Europe.
Mr. CHURCHILL offered amendment that the resolu-
tion is meant compliment only, and opposed the
resolution predicting that before the session closet
resolution viii be introduced pedging this government
to intervention.
Mr.. McMu,IxS denied that Kossuth is the nation 8
guest, and condemned Intervention
Mr. APPLETON OF Maine, contendsd that the resolution
was merely one Of courtesy, and spoke favoraby of
Kossuih.
Mr.. GRow defended the attacks made on Kossuth.
Mr. Stanton of Ky. moved to amend by inserting the
three resolutions knewn kossuths platform. Kejec
ted -
Mr. gayley addressed the committee against intervsa-
ton, and the consequences involved
Mr. RICHARDSON offered aHerdrleas that the
ebesker request the committee to report whether in
their opinion, the resolution inviting Father Mathew
TO seat in the hall, committed the members Of Con
gress and the government to the OF temperance
(Received with shouts Of laugLter.)
Mr.. YATES in favor OF the original resolution.
Copgress should not bc behind the people, but give him
adherence of Austrian and Russian tyranny then he
for it,
Mr. GsAy in favor of the original resolution and
opposed to amendments OF any kind.
Various amendments were moved. No quorum voted
although there present and the roll ma to be
called repeatedly to nste absentees Neither the
mics Of the resolution nor its friends would give in
Motions made and voted down. that the com nit.
tee rise. Tbs committee finally, without quorum
rose and Mr. STANLEY meved adjourn uent.-Negs-
tiYed by yea and nay vote.
Finally the contest given by the friends Of tbs
resolution. ard without voting on it, the House ad
joprned till Friday