The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1852-11-05
Car Relations with Cuba.
TIA VIEWS o. THK SPANISH GOVERNMENT
TREATY WIN SPAIN.


TREATY Win SPAIN.
ia n lie DsriO DE la Marina Oct. %
4Ne compete exactDess 1t which we aim in all
~. seeIti0rs. as necessary condition Of the re-
fffcs vhiob ~ owe 10 Ourselves, and as a part Of
Zoe c9tt8eEce Shch we pretend TO inspire, induces
40 y revert 20 sentence In first article in yes
tTosy paper, and explain what may, perhaps, lead
To a nissypIcheusioD When We stated that the
Crescent City remained in our port, en- her return
from New Orleans without holding any com nnni-
patton Whatever, we must be underst God az speak
bg IN reference to the facility Of disembarking or
Pointing passengers sno correspondence, or enjoy
ing the slightest CON mercisl franchise. OF course,
the CON mubica, lions which could be had. through
the ceIdescension Of the authorities and the agency
al the Captain Of the Port, must not be included in
what We said
qhb being understood we ratify all that We wrote
In regard 10 this matter yesterday, as beiog faith
ful relation Of all that occurred
We are not ignorant of the fact that the very I'M
FUNDED ueteBtions 81 some orators Of the United
States, urged with a view 10 limit the indsputabe
power Which We maintained belonged TO Spain by
virtue " the Law OF nations, are founded on the
treaty cenclu1ed between the two nations on the
17tk DAY Of Osiober lbs We conceoe that there
may be cA<es in which a nation, or is Goyonm emit
aud repre- sentative, may implicitly renounce part
q the privileges Conferred upon II by international
law but there must be no doubt whatever resting
ppou the remuneration, aud IL must be clearly and
erTFtstly stated, aud not implied merely II, then,
there exgt 10 tbs treaty Of 1895 clause Of such
character, would have TO abide By IL, though IL
could Dot bot be matter oi wonder for all persons,
kssrlns In mind The relative position Of Spain and
The lnited States, TIA, our nation should have al
bowed hdttlf 20 be debated ~ by that new born
reyUblie, vbich 10 our fsvors and those Of France
lsed its very existence.
Par di6srsnt hon this, however does the case
sssrd, and propose nOs 10 prove. taking the
said treaty q ban lldefon,s a. q D.sls, AMI con.
stfung literally and reasonably, tha--Firstly ID in
no vsy calls Ia question the right Of sovereignty
property, and dominion u spain. within ker o~n
legitimate territory and, secondly, that the said
fusi never mad ard never could have reference 10
the ultrsms-ins provinces Of the monarchy The
enonstrAtop Il sitasr Ct tbcse points l. In itself
oscisre. ard the weight which both united exer-
&C IN tie matter 20 settles the question a. 10
sKriude for ever al cspiious reasoning or pgcrile
eariNirr To proceed with method, We shall begin
w. ue8 inG a the constFueticn 20 be given 10 the
isras = the treaty above referred 70, granting for
&c rnt. for the sske 81 Argansnt, that Il em
49, al islspd sd that ~ prorisi0ns ars % be
tfe - C@es i y nsfer > grateful task 20 "
~ astf fteeurst - he fubtstage q avoiding the
IL - ests isns 90 tstns. 90 - sh4nBlag
- a. estsfsrf. NEVER aa ieftat a tn
Ell 0st.f sHteei #eax tsiiy Coz.
$50 II y. ui1ie 49, v - $500, - s...-s